No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/01/25 - Agenda Packeta c. c� a z �c 0 ar a ni �z —t r a � z z cn n co O co 3 .n z CITY OF RAMHO C[;C NIO \GA AGENDA 1977 WEDNESDAY January 25, 1334 7:09 p.m. LIONS PARK CONINFJNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOliM A L P' ledge of Allegiance U. Roll Call Commissioner Barker_ Commissioner Juarez Commissioner VcNi.i M. Announcements IV. Approval of 'inmates December 14, 1983 Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be rouElne and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF F. NEW ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPE OF TRACT 12320 - TERRA -WEST PARTNERSHIP - 116 condominium units located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria Avenues - APN 202 - 181 -07. VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which crncerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each protect. !p PLAN AMENDh1ENT yaJ I:vlr vo Zn%% Ira%. - a requesx is amen Lne uenerau rain Land Use Map from Office to Low medium Residential (4 -8 du/ac) and a Development Districts amendment to change the Development Districts Map from OP to LM, all on 4.36 acres located on the nort: -_sst corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue - APN 202- 191 -13. 4W C. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84-01 B - LINCOLN PROPERTIES - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use :flap from Office to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du, lac) on 3.67 acres located on the northwest :orner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202- 101 -21. D. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -01 C - ACACIA - A Fe-quest to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) on 3.58 acres located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -33. E. ENVIRONMENTAL conaomimum units on e.l acres < Residential District (14 -24 du/ac) Vineyard, South of Foothill - APN ine aeveiopment of izt �f land in the Medium -High located on the east side of 208- 241 -11. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1257 7 - PILGRINIS - A custom lot residential subdivision of 16 lots on 4.24 acres of land in the "L" District !2-4 Du/Ac), located on the south side of 19th Street, west of Hellman Avenue - APN 202 - 041 -03 and 52. G. in the General Industrial/ located on the northwest Avenue - APN 209 - 261 -07. VHL Public Comments 1VIENT NT 123,540 sq. ft. on 8 acres of land fail Served category (Subarea 5) corner of 6th Street and Center This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. UL Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an II p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. r 0 IARIG WEINITIOMAI �OV►ORT- CPPY OF RANCHO CVCAW*IGA M I N U T E S CI-1Y OF Ri�NCriO C 'OI1Gn PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES December 14, 1983 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDQ Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho L:�Cr =nnTO ;nanri"T rn+micginn to order at % D.S. The meeting was held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Rase Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, CA Chairman Stout then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dave Barker, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Addie Juarez, Larry McNiel STAFF PRESENT: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer; Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward A. Hopson, Assistant ::ity Attorney; Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Michael 4airin, Senior Planner ANNOUNCEMNTS Rick Gomez, City Planner, wished everyone a Merry Christmas from the Community Development Department. MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the October 26, 1983 Planning Commission meeting, as corrected. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the November 9, 1983 meeting. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Barker asked, regarding Item A, if there will be a financial impact as a result of acquisition of the alleyway requested by the property owners in the form of increased taxes. Mr. Hopson replied that there could be an increased valuation of the real property portion of the property owner's tax bill but it would have a very small effect. Further, this would not cause a reassessment because the acquisition is not a remodeling, addition to the property or a sale thereof. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Harker, carried unanimously, to adopt the Consent Calendar. A. REQUEST FOR ALLEY VACATION - MARTINEZ - North /south alley located west of Center and south of 25th Street. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOP..kENT REVIDW 83 -38 — GABRIC — The development of two industrial manufacturing buildings totaling 130,272 square feet on 6.1 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located on the northwest corner of 7th Street and Utica Avenue - APN 209 - 401 -14 - 17. 0. E1vinvi�cianiAL AJJCJJI•iLl,l �vn ✓... - �-�i The development of a 37,000 sq. ft. ice cream bar manufacturing building on 5.8 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 10) located on the northeast corner of 7th Street and Toronto Avenue - APM 209 - 401 -o6. i 3 f f i PUBLIC FEARINGS D. EN:'- RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12530 - MARTIN - A Tract subdivison of 5 lots on 1.85 acres of lard in the R -1 zone, located on the west side of Hellman Avenue at Palo Alto - APN 208 - 021 -09. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout copened the public hearing. Mr. Ron M- :*tin, the applicant, stated that he was _familiar with the conditions of approval and they are acceptable. There being n- further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated that he would like to see this completed because this was a problem before. Commissioner Rempel questioned reopening the storm drain and %zh,,t the ir`•ent is because it is really plugged up. Mr. Rougeau replied that the intent is that with the addition of the larger tract as well as this one there will be walls in place along the railroad right -cf -way that will prohibit the water from overflowing the way it has beer.. Commissioner Rempel asked if it would be more practical to take that drair out to Hellman to the top lot. Planning Commission Minutes 2 December 14, 1983 tar. Rougeau replied that staff is looking at that possibility and also for the eas.cst way to maintain the drain- in the future so that it will stay -Pen - Commissioner Rempel stated tnat�vndergrounding the drain would cause a lot of problems. Mr. Rougeau replied that if a pipe is used, it will only plag up again. Further, that a concrete channel will be put into Beryl and Heilman. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -139, approving Tentative Tract No. 12530 and issuing a negative declaration. E. EA'IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12462 - JENSEN - A custom lot residential subdivision of 27 lots on 18.49 acres of land in the VL (Very Low Residential) district, located on the south side of Summit Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue - AP19 225- 181 -02 and 03. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Vairin further stated that he received from the applicant this evening a possible solution to the character considerations un Summit Avenue and showed this to the Commission on the overhead projector. The change combined the three lots to the north and increased the number of the lots below as they were large enough to support this change. Mr. Vairin stated that the Commision now has four options; 1) to approve the map as submitted tonight; 2) to approve with one less lot as described in the resolution of approval; 3) to approve as revised and shown on the screen tonight; or 4) to continue this item until all areas have been addressed per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Frank Williams of Associated Engieers, represent_r`g the applicant, stated that if this map is approved per the change presented this evening, he requests that condition one of the resolution be deleted. He indicated that they would accept condition one of the resolution if it does not mean that they would have to accept fewer lots and if the Commission wishes further study, they would request a continuance of this matter rather than denial of the project. Mr. Jensen, the applicant, stated that fe agreed with staff on the impact removal of the windrows would have on Summit Avenue. He indicated that his engineers feel this is an adequate project and meets the minimum requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He felt that this project should be approved. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Baker stated that Mr. Williams had alluded to a problem with the alternative. Mn. Williams replied that the steepness of the slope would be a problem and would be complicated by the removal of a lot along Summit because it would then create a split level condition rather than normal construction. Plan=ing Commission Minutes 3 December 14, 1983 Mr. Vairin stated that since staff only this evening received the new proposal concerning the lots, and if the Commission wishes to examine the proposal, he would recommend that this item be continued in order to determine if it meets the criteria of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and also the grading issue. Commissioner Rempel stated that he would like to have some discussion on whether the lots should be eliminated. Further, that when the Commission receives a request for subdivision he would like to see what the configuration of the property directly across the street to see what will happen there. He indicated that there will be another street there eventually and that it will have to be a street cut from the west side of the lot. He said that. u;don; ;t .. Out -- - - -p _ .... ,, , u�G uu� make IL match the street because the tots oAi either side ere .ot that much wider than the :uv feet. Mr. Vairin stated that the Design Review Committee felt that since those lots already have homes on them and would not be furth-,r developed, that the two streets would probably be aligned. Commissioner Rempel stated that eventually it will be a public street although now it is private with homes facing onto it, but it has no bearing on these lots. Further, the plan as proposed is adequate and he would like to see condition one of the resolution under the Planning section eliminated. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Harker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -140, approving Tentative Tract 121162, deleting condition one under the Planning section of the Resolution, and issuing a negative declaration. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 121133 - K & H - The development of 432 semi - attached single family manufactured homes on 115 acres of land within the Victoria Planned Community, designated Medium and Medium -?sigh Residential, located at the njrtheast cc -ner of Base Line Road and Milliken_ Avenue - a portion of- APN 227 - 081 -06. Commissioner Rempel stepped down from discussion of this item due t. a possible conflict of interest. Commissioner Barker asked if a quorum exists since Commissioner Rempel stepped down. Assistant City Attorney, Hopson, replied that the rules of the Planning Commission indicate that three members of the Commission constitute a majority; however the fact that the Commission started with a quorum and a member has now stepped down, would be a reasonable extension under the rules of 1978, that the rOyission is unable tc act. Mr. Hopson stated that he had anticipated the absence of one member of the Commission at tonight's meeting, but not two, with the possible disqualification of another member. He asked that he and Mr. Gomez be allowed to take a brief recess in order to study the questions. Planning Commission Minutes 4 December 113, 1983 7.29 p.m. The Assistant City Attorney and tor. Gomez left the table. Chairman Stout advised that the Commission would go on to the next agenda item. t f i i i G. ENVIRO.T.AENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12376 - FORECAST - A custom lot subdivision of 16 lots on 20.9 acres of land in the 8 -1- 20,000 zone (Hillside Residential pending), located north of Almond Street, generally west of Sapc ^ire Street - APN 200- 051 -06 and 07. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report and provided slides for viewing by the Commission of the subject property. Chairman Stout asked if someone could show the Commission where the large ravine is in relation to this property. Mr. Johnson pointed this out to the Commission. PL^. Vairin stated that the boundaries are essentially a bluff to the canyon. Chairman Stout asked if the EIR would be for the entire piece or just a part of it. Mr. Vairin replied that CEQA asks that cumulative impacts be studied and the entire site would be looked at. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim Previti, 9513 Business Center Drive, Rancho Cucamogna, the applicant stated they will develop 21 acres and the reason they applied for this is because the division they are seeking is within the Fire District's seven minute response time and is the only portion which can be developed under the regulations. Mr. Previti stated that he had spoken to staff and indicated that it would be an economic burden to do a full EIR rather than a focused EIR for the 16 lets involved. Further, that Mr. Vairin indicated tha there are 12 points which must be addressed relative to this piece of property and Mr. Previti felt that the City should allow this subdivision as the first phase because they could speak to he 12 points. He indicated that they have consulted with a geologist and civil engineer and could sufficiently address the issues. Mr. Joe Gorman, environmentalist, Claremont, stated that Mr. Previti is reluctant to do a complete environmental impact report because of the economic impact. Mr. Gorman agreed with the staff evaluation that the character of the land changes drastically from the southeast portion of 21 acres to the entire tract both in topography and hydrology as well as soil and would require a certain amount of cautious approach in developing it. Mr. Gorman went over Part II, the environmental checklist, indicating those areas with which he agreed and those with which he had questions. He stated that he felt the applicant should approach the EIR in a piecemeal fashion; Planning Commission Minutes 5 December 14, 1983 that the p:oblew -mz rcu'd be answered; the political mechanics which are a small p:�hlem could re Sork.•d out; and a document could be prepared that would sufficiently address tai°' concerns in terms of the structures that people would build. Mr. Gary Healy, Madol_-� Commission which he ha Part II of the Ir_itia: conditions, hydrolog;, Public services. z,ad �:sociates, distributed maps to he Planning 1 prepared that addressed items 1 -12 of the addendum to Stdy, 17dicating his disagreement with slope :a,id use and planning considerations, and utilities and Mr. Darwin Mark, land planner for the applicant, stated that the Commission :could be hard pressea to see what part of the applicant's land is being developed. Further, that ie-th the lc:r number of lots proposed for development, it emphasizes the applicant's concern for the sensitive nature of this property, Mr. Mark felt that the problems to the north of this piece of property could be addressed at a later time. Mr. Art Bridge, 8715 Banyan, owner of the adjacent piece of property to the south and southwest, stated that be is well acquainted with this piece and considers it to be extremely sensitive. Further, that an EIR is essential for the entire piece and should not be done on a piecemeal basis. Mr. Bridge stated that the Fire District is being very generous when they say tha the area being considered at this meeting, is within the seven minute response time, because there is a fire hazard which must be addressed. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker stated tha he was not satisfied with Dr. Gorman's comments that the environmental issues should be approached in a piecemeal fashion. He indicated tha it would make sense to address the entire area and asked that this be done. Chairman Stout stated his agreement with Commijsioner Barker's comments and indicated he felt the previous Planning Commission made a mistake in allowing the love. area to be developed without an EIR. Further, that because one mistake had been made should not mean this Commission must compound the error. Commissioner Hempel stated that there had been considerable study on this whole piece of property about four years ago and because of the lay cf the land and the flat land of the lower piece, it was felt that it was not essential. Commissioner Hempel stated that you cannot divide 't:is piece of Property from the rest and the entire picture must be looked at. He indicated that the drainage must be examined as well as what will happen to the east of this tract. Further, that the Commission is not being shown what is happening around and above the item in question. Planning Commission Minutes 6 Deccmber 14, 1983 Commissioner fiempel stated all of these areas must be addressed and the only way to address them is through a complete environmental study. Chairman Stout stated he sees this area as sensitive as that above Beryl. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, that staff be directed to prepare an environmental impact report tc study all of the issues involved as outlined in the initial study. Chairman_ .Stout - atatcd the Commission ....SIR t0 item F f ....... Fn.i... tal Assessment and Tentative: Tract 12133 — K & B. Mr. Hopson stated that the Planning Commission rules indicate that two members of the Commission or less than a quorum could be used to adopt minutes. However, to say that two members could perform the official act of adopting a tract map would be stretching the rules, in his opinion. Mr. Hopson stated he felt that less than a quorum should not approve something as significant as lard use determinations or a tract map, and this being the case, did not feel that this item could be considered this evening. �,r. Gomez stated the applicant has asked for a continuance of this item. Chairman Stout asked if testimony could be taken this evening without a quorum. Mr. Hopson replied that the problem is that t`_e purpose of a hearing is to have a quorum of the formal body hear the testimony and since they are not present, the testimony tonight would serve no purpose. Commissioner fiempel again left the Commission table. Mn. Frank Scardini, 11601 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, indicated they would not want to put anyone on a spot and asked for a continuance to a date certain. Chairman Stout asked if January 11, 1983 would be agreeable to them. Mr. Scardini replied it would. Motion. Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried, that this item be continued to January 11, 1984. : a • ■ � 8:15 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:25 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Planning Commission Minutes 7 December 14, 1983 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -17 - 84 LUMBER - The develupment of a 31,200 sq. ft. building for 84 Lumber on 2.55 acres in the lndc; atrial Park category (Subarea 6), located on the west side of Faven, south o: 8th Street - A_-N 209 - 251 -05. Assistant Planner, Curt Johnston, r,viewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked if Mr. Johnston had an overhead slide showing the detail of the driveway approach. Mr. Johnston showed the Commission the driveway approach for 84 Lumber and the adjacent property, KVL, on the overhead projector and explained the situation to them. Chairman Stout asked who owns the driveway approach that sides -or. to the driveway. M .Johnston replies that it is owned by KVL and the property is L- shaped or a flag lot. Mr. Johnston further stated that there is a MWD easement which precludes any building on any portion of the easement to the east of this and is one of the reasons that the street is shown on '_t. Mr. John Rickey, 293 Birchwood, Moraga, CA 94555, stated that he would answer any questions. Chairman Stout asked if any agreement had been worked on between the applicant and KVL. M.^. Rickey replied that he thought they had a preliminary agreement. M.^. Bob Kirkland, 8978 Haven, Rancho Cucamonga, read a letter dated December 7, 1983, addressed to Paul Rougeau, to the Commission which stated that no agreement had been reached between KVL and 84 Lumber. Further, that Mr. Bose stated to him that there would be a road whether one is needed or rot. Mr. Kirkland stated that he is Opposed to the 84 L.. -- <__� ..ar }iv�c�:� because of the access problem and they they will not provide access for the 84 Lumber Project. Further, Mr. Kirkland said that the road would reduce 6.12 acres to 3.2 and would destroy West Coast Netting by going through the property. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civi, Engineer, referred to Sub -area 6 and the Industrial Specific Plan. He indicated that the road in question is necessary to connect 8th Street with Haven when the railroad undercrossing goes in. Further. that when development of circulation for the Industrial Specific Plan was taking place, it appeared logical to have the road run along the north side of KVL property and turn to Acacia because that is the only place where It could cut into Haven Avenue due to the median island. Mr. Rougeau stated that this is not an essential requirement for Eighth Street because it could intersect at other places, and it has been explained to Mr. Kirkland that the only time the road would be obtained would be if he subdivided. Further, it Planning Commission Minutes 8 December 14, 1983 is vaguely possible that at some point in time the city could condemn the property to put in a road if it felt it was absolutely necessary for circulation in the area. M:-. Rougeau stated providing access to 84 Lumber will absolutely not affect the street going in or not going in. Chairman Stout stated that Mr. Rougeau indicated there will be a median cut in Acacia. He asked if another driveway is put in for 84 Lumber and the median cut was placed at that driveway could the driveway be closed off and could KVL be forced to use on1v the one driveway for 84 Lumber so that there will be only one opening to Haven_ Mr. Rougeau replied thzt this could be gone but it woui•i create a problem with the street across because the offset goes the other way and it would therefore not be aligned. Chairman Stout asked if there would have to be some legal technicalities worked out for the acces-- between 84 Lumber and KVL. Mr. Rougeau replied that is correct because there is no wav that the City can force them to provide the access. Chairman Stout asked Mr. Kirkland if it is his position that if he provided the access for 84 Lumber it would cause a road to be placed there. Mr. Kirkland replied that is is his feeling that his flag lot will be consumed by that road and not shared. Commissioner Rempel asked where the DWP easement is. Mr. Kirkland replied that their driveway is in the middle. Commissioner Rempel stated that the road Mr. Kirklar_.i is talking about that would affect his factory is 'he road that will go north and not this road. Chairman. Stout stated that it sounds like tte problem is a legal issue that should be settled by the two property owners involved. There was brief further discussion relative to the driveway tetween Mr. Kirkland and Chairman Stout. Mr. John Rickey stated Mr. Kirkland has thrown a curve to him tonight anc. it is his understanding that there will net be a curb cut or a left turn ap;iroach on Haven because if you go north :ou can turn north anyway. Mr. Rougeau replied this is not correct as there are median breaks at Tr`. Street z:id also at Acacia. Nr. Rickey stated that is not his understanding. Planning Commission Minutes 9 December 14, 1983 Mr. Rougeau stated looking at the circuldtion plan you have a major street at 6th Sheet. Mr. Gomez stated there are other, alternatives that can be considered, and if the Commission Lashes to have more information brought back to them, this item could be continued. Chairman Stout closed the public hearing. Chaiiman Stout stated he did not think the access problem is insurmountable a,nd asked if there is a plan for a street there at the presen'- time or not. Mr. Rcugcau replied that the current conditions of approval do not call for improvements for any future street, only Haven. Further, there are no plans to improve the north side of the driveway as a street. Mr. Rickey stated that he is at an impasse and he needs to :sow if they will be able to get into his property. Further, he and Mr. Kirkland need to kn_w what will happen. Commissioner Rempel stated that he cant.�� pee that the street will ever corns down from the north into the property. (�Ir . Kirkland suggested that the decision on this be put off until the next meeting. Commissioner Barker asked what role the Planning Commission will play in this if the applicant and Mr. Kirkland do not reach an agreemnt and whether the Commission could come up with an action. Further, he asked if the Commission could adopt a resolution contingent upon the two parties coming to an agreement and then this would not have to come back to the Commission. Mr. Gomez stated that if you allow an opportunity for an out there is always the possibiity that negotiations will not be continued in good faith. Mr. Stout stated that this is a civil issue that will have to be decided between the two parties. However, because of the Commission's thoughts and plans on how they want Haven to be, this is the only solution. if agreement is not reached, he stated, this can be brought back to the Commission. Mr. Hopson stated that he does not see a legal problem with this and is the only way it can be done. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -141 approving CUP No. 83 -17 and issuing a negative declaration contingent upon access agreement between the two parties. i i i t t Planning Commission Minutes 10 December 14, 1983 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12525 - TRUAX - A tonal development and subdivision of 16.5 acres into 123 lots, comprising 122 zero lot line units in the R -s /PD zone, generally located cn the west side of Center, between Arrow and 206th Street - APN 209 - 091 -10 Curt Joh- stun, Assistant Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked if the sLggested wall is contained within the resolution. Mr. Johnston. replied that there is a condition, for a wall and staff feels that it is adequately covered. Chai ^man Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Daryl Anderson, 145 Main Street, Tustin, CA, apprised the Commission of the housing product. Chairman Stout asked what the price range of these homes will be. Mr. Anderson replied between $89,000 - 100,000. There being no further questions, the public hearing was closed. Moticn: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -142, approving Tentative Tract 12525 and issuing a negative declaration.. J. ENVIRO.2VMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - An amendment to Title 14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 14.20.110 of Chapter 14.20, Signs, to change the maximum height limit for a wall sign on an industrial building from 20 feet to a height not to project ab..e the roofline. Michael Va_rin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked if the change in the ordinance would allow a sign to be placed between the six story buildings in the Barton Plaza. Mr. Vairin replied that this is not the type of use that will be affected by the change in the sigr_ ordinance as it will only affect industrial buildnns. Mr. Gomez stated that the change is dependent on the use and not the zone in which the building is located. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes i1 December 14, 1983 There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion- Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carrion unanimously, to adopt Resolution, No. 83 -143, recommending an amendment to the Sign Ordinance to Specify the maximum height limit for wall signs on industrial buildings. Chairman Stout stated that a request had been made by Mr. Jack Butler to address the Commission regarding his project, DR 83 -13, Pepperwood. Mr. Butler presented a letter to the Commission which asked for relief from coedit -4--,= ;-- O,°,ed. '-Pon Ms project by the C u— =.Jssion to reach agreement with the Vista del Verde development, adjacent to his project relative to drainage. He indicated that the owners of the Vista del Verde were asking an excessive amount for easement to be used for drainage which would be unworkable from their point of view. M_. Butler stated that they have met the requirement: of the Resolution and have designed something that would handle the drainage flows and asked that they be given the necessary permits in order to proceed with buildng. Chairman Stout asked if when the original Pepperwood proje.:t came through the drainage was to flow to the south and then bend to the east and flow through ironwood. Mr. Butler, replied yes and no. He indicated they were given two options and they would have to get an easement from the property :,caner. He further indicated that they elected to go south oecause it was in their best economic interest because of the shorter distance. However, that propeiy owner lives in Lebanon and they are unable to get to the fee aver in order to get the easement and therefore had to go to the east. Chairman Stout stated that the problem is that the other project was conditioned to take the water all the vay over to Heilman. He indicated that the water from Mr. Butler's project will dump into Eastwood, which is what they have been trying to prevent. Mr. Butler asked for a waiver of the condition as a temporary means to allow his project to more forward. Chairman Stout asked if what Mr. Butler is saying is he has no objection to eventually hooking up to a pipe that would take the water to Hellman. Mr. Butler replied that is correct. Mr. Butler stated for the record, that they are also willing to make an additional cash contribution as long as it is reasonable. Plan.-4-9 Commission Minutes i2 December 1$, 1983 Chairman Stout statec that this Commission promised the people livinf in the tract adjacent to his development that they would no allow water to go into their streets and he felt obligated to tell them the truth in that it was beyond their power to realize this problem at the time this was being considered. Mr. Sutler felt that the truth should be told. Chairman Stout stated tha since this is a public_ hearing pi ,ulem he did not know what official action to take. Mr F^ „pt,n ctat d .�t ther c is an aacil.ary pr oblc= to the rail Hopson stated this is not an unchangeable matter but the policy of the City in the past has been not to allow projects to pull permits on an incremental b�.:i:, bc: only when all conditions of the project have been received. He indicated that if a project is allowed to pull grading permits and then proceed with the grading, a significant :_ nvestment has been made which could affect the City's ability to deny approval later because of the substantial investment made in the improvement of the property. Mr. Hopson indicated that this is not a policy that is cast in con:rete but is an issue of sore than where the water is going. Mr. Hopson stated that there is another po.'_icy, that of school letters, which may or may not be forthcoming. Mr. Butler indicated that he would be picking up a school letter the following day. Commissioner Barker stated that the concern is that there would be a substantial investment of money with some changes made to the property which may create a problem that would be unable to be adjusted. ILr. Butler stated that they would not alter the propert, and drainage pattern significantly. Mr. Gomez stated that if the Commission agrees with what has been presented details can be worked out with specific actions that would be triggered by certain dates so that it is not a temporary sol::tion that will be for a long term. Chairman Stout stated that for some reason it appears that these two developments cannot get along and he asked, if this is the case, how will the problem get solved. Mr. Hopson stated that the problem must be solved. Mr. Vairin stated that the condition states that water must be received from all adjacent properties. Commissioner Rempel stated that this property must drain into this street or another street into the tract. Planning Commission Minutes 13 December 7$, 1983 Chairman Stout stated that it can't get to the development through the pipe. Mr. Butler stated that trey can give the easement they purchased to the v=ty, because if the City owns the easement and the drainage system that is installed, there is no way to prevent the owner of the other property from hooking it up. Chairman. Stour, stated he would find it hard to believe that the City would accept that. Following brief discussion, Mr. Hopson stated that it would be possible to leave the final decision for specific approval to the Grading Committee. Mr. t:at t 1n days of nulling their permits. stated staed - - Commissioner Rempel stated that is why it has been left up to the City Attorney to work out the language. Mr. Gomez stated that the letter from the school district plays a very important part in this. Jim Frost, Councilmember, asked if he 5.s led to assume that the developer will purchase a school letter as opposed to another process. It% Hooson stated that all the Planning Commission did was impose a condition that the school district issue a letter. Outside of that, the City has stayed out of how an autonomous public entity will see whether they will issue a letter or not. He indicated that he has been surprised by what he has read in the newspaper. Further, that if someone provides a school letter and the signature or. it is not a forgery, the condition that the Planning Commission has set is satisfied. Commissioner Hempel stated that since this is a condition imposed by the Council, we would be hard pressed to ask how the letter was obtained. a a ■ t Chairman Stout stated that he had asked Mr. Gomez for a brief overview of what has been going on as far as projects are concerned and what was presented to the Commission at this meeting was a brief newsletter which has been very informative. He indicated that he would like to move it up on the agenda the next time so that more people will benefit from it. Commissioner Barker questioned whether there will be a quorum for the fourth Wednesday of the month. The consensus of the Commission was that there will not be a quorum. Planning Commission Minutes 14 December 14, 1983 Motion: Moved by Rempel, seonded by Barker, carried unanimcusly, to adjourn to the January 11, 1934 Planning Commission meeting- ADJOURNMENT 9:40 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes 15 December 14, 1983 u 11 11 CITY OF 1UNCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 'Y: Frank Oreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A NEW ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPE tOR TRACT _2, - TERRA WEST PARTNERSHIP - 116 Condominium units located on the southwest corner of Archibald and Victoria Avenues - APN 202- 181 -07. BACKGROUND: The Terra West Parnership is requesting a change in product type for a previously approved condominium development located on the southwest corner of Archibald and Victoria Avenues. The Design Review Committee has determined that the new architectural product adequately conforms to the basic design standards of the City and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: The Design Review Committee found that the new architectural product for Tract 12320 will be compatible with surrounding land uses and recommends approval. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Proposed Elevations Exhibit "B" - Previously Approved Elevations Exhibit "C" - Site Plan /Location Map ITEM A c� _j RA -NCHO CUC-�.NiO\GA PLANNING DI\rISDNT c� �J 1 �.1 U EXHIBIT: _ .4,\ SCALE C F] 11 RANCHO Ci;CI- MO GA PLAir\ING DIVISION EXHIBIT- SAS -1 SCINLE. f `� �At J:i- •tr' -lS v,_-- tires.,. �-rr. -c .�,.St -�-.7 a7 L ..Y 4t.A • � rG'.�:: L 1- Yr F� �J.7� 1 . :Tt � ..1 rt � w' ti.E ve�•.ty -�jtx .......... M •.1rt- •- �yt:Yi. ti M s� _ ter.► -- � ��� r ' I •.. it� , ~ ••r' -=( r --- - «{.'i%•'_' :fir'..::: -- ri • • i i � 7��. i.c -w.. _ �– .� •X -ice• –. —^ � S�� .'�_ � .... .e. ._ . 1 � 9 I,Y r -`� —_ �jCl- n._.�r..•,iS' -... .ems _ .. _ _ I I i .I I t u L. all I �I — T 9..r :.y I i E i I • I I c r. I- r+o•��rr ry FORTE-{ CITY OR !Tr--'.I: Is RANCHO CLCAN10\G:-k TITLE: PLANNI \G DIN °ISIO\ E \HIl3IT: C-� SCALE: A- s .v.+rl •u. 4 • �rsY. .r ..✓1 r. I- r+o•��rr ry FORTE-{ CITY OR !Tr--'.I: Is RANCHO CLCAN10\G:-k TITLE: PLANNI \G DIN °ISIO\ E \HIl3IT: C-� SCALE: A- s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendments January 25, 1984 Page 2 1 As illustrated on the General Plan Land Use Map, office /professional uses act as a buffer to transition intensities from one use to another along major arterials. In addition, office /professional uses have been used in the development of the General Plan as compromises between the City's need to establish a land use community design pattern and an applicant's or property owner's need to expand his land into what he may consider its highest and best use, which in most cases is commercial. Also, the Development_ Code has permitted a quasi - commercial development pattern to occur within the OP category. This is illustrated by the use tat',s within the Development Code (see attached) which show the expanded commercial and support commercial uses within the permitted and conditionally permitted land uses, Pie land use pattern context of certain areas throughout the City was intended to provide urban centers such as those along Base Line and at the intersection of Archibald and Base Line. These urban centers were intended to have a neighborhuod orientation to commercial and office /professional uses. Those commercial and office /professional uses located near the corners of Foothill and Haven and along the regional center at Foothill and I -15 were intended to provide more of a regional orientation. Another area that provides office /professional uses are those within the Industrial Specific Plan which are under the category of Industrial Park. Industrial Park categories are planned, group concentrations of industrial and research and development offices. They are typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees per acre is high. The Plan states that these uses shall be organized along major thoroughfares, especially along 4th Street, Haven, and Foothill Eoulevarc along the periphery of the industrial areas and when convenient access to public transit. ANALYSIS: The description of the office land use policy in the General Plan definitely lacks sufficient detail or. neighborhood, regional, and locational criteria. Within the past six months the City has received five requests for amendments from office /professional to some other land use. Besides these current three, you will recall that Acacia also applied with the last cycle in 1983 and was denied by the Planning Commission due to the lack of evidence demonstrating the need for such a change. Also in that group was Jack larr's request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map for the intersection of Base Line and Archibald from office /professional use to neiahborhood commercial which was denied by the Planning Commission, appealed by the applicant and approved by the City Council. With these new requests for change, an overvie-a analysis of the office /pi ,ifessional needs prior to making a final decision on these site - specific requests is needed. An analysis of the office /professional is needed not only from the General Plan policy aspect of neighborhood versus regional office nee�s and from an urban forms policy viewpoint, but also from the short and long -term market Biel AD u IU: FROM: SUBJECT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT flm C4� z 1977 (;nalrman and Members of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, City Planner 0 84 -01 A AND DEVELOPMENT AMtNUMtN1 64 -UZ - OLYMPU PACIFIC - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) and a development district amendment to change the Development Districts Map from OP to LM, all on 4.36 acres located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue - APN 202- 191 -13. 84 -01 8 - LINCOLN PROPERTIES - A request to amena the General Plan Land Use Map from Office to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) on 3.67 acres located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 101 -21. o GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8 amend the General Plan Medium -High Residential located on the west approximately 500 feet 202 - 151 -33. 4 -01 C Land l (14 -24 side north - ACACIA - A reauest to Ise Map fr,)m Office to du /ac) on x.58 acres of Archibald Aver-ue, of Base Line - AWN ABSTRACT: The intent of this report is to aggregate these three Gener .-1 Plan amendmcnt applications requesting an amendment from Office to various classifications of Multi - Family Residential. In order to review the major issues of Office /Professional uses within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, this report will look at the office /professional use as a buffer land use and a transitional land use, as well as a quasi - commercial land use as developed in the General Plan and Development Code. BACKGROUND: The General Plan intent of office land use is to prevent the proliferation of individual isolated offices with integrated complexes where related support office uses can be located. Commercial uses permitted within the office category include administrative and professional offices, business support services, financial, insurance, real estate, and services which support commercial uses such as restaurant and medical services. The General Plan states that office complexes along Base Line are to be locally oriented while those offices near the regional centzr should be oriented to the region. ITEMS B, C, AND 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendments January 25, 1984 Page 3 11 demand aspect. A market analysis by a private consultant cculd give the Planning Commission the information necessary to determine the short and long -term demands for office /professional uses. Such a study co :jld determine the amount of land which should be reserved for office /professional uses based upon poten`•_ial market support in addition to key locations for future officeiprofessional development and a forecast. RECOMMENDATION: It is staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission direct the Planning Division staff to pursue one of two options: (1) prepare an overview analysis of the market demand for office /professional uses with the aid of a consultant who would delineate the primary and competitive market areas for office professional uses in Rancho Cucamonga and estimate the overall demand C or office /professional uses in the competitive market area in order to determine the proper amount of office /professional uses and identify those key locations within the City for the appropriate office /professional. developments. The cost of such study, which is estimated at between $5,000 and $10,000, and would be proportionately shared am:ng the current applicants requesting the modification at the estimated t'me frame of eight weeks; or, (2) direct staff to prepare an analysis a, each individual site from just a General Plan /Urban form policy standpoint without the benefit of an overview of office /pref:.-sional uses as described in option. (I.). I would caution that this approach would only allow the Commission to look at the site specific re,aests and not answer the overall question regarding office /profesiAonal land uses in the City. Resp6ctfully °ubmitted, '7 Rick Gomez City planner ,RG /jr i -3- CHAPTER 17.10 COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS Section 17.1.0.01.0 Purposes and General Plan Consistency A. The following objectives have been formulated for the commercial and office districts for the implementation of the General Plan goals and objectives. 1. Provide appropriately located areas for office uses, retail stores and service establishments to meet the needs of the community. 2. Promote and encourage Office and Cc- Mcrciai locations and designs to be conveniently accessible by bicycle and foot, as well as by automobile. 3. Promote and encourage office and commercial uses to be designed in centers or like groups for the convenience of the public and to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. 4. Use and promote open spaces and landscaping to create a visually pleasing environment, as well as to distinguish city and neighborhood boundaries. 5. Intensified or regional - related commercial uses shall be organized and designed to promote maximum opportunity for transit usage. 5. It is intended that commercial /office uses and developments will promote social interaction and minimize adverse environmental impacts and resource consumption. 7. Commercial and office developments shall exhibit the highest standards of site planning, architecture and landscape design. Section 17.10.020 Commercial Office Districts These districts have beer, created for implementation of the goals, objectives and land use designations of the G-caeral Plan. A. Office /Professional District (O-P). This district is intended primarily for the development of prof essional/administrative offices and personal services rather than commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. B. Neighborhood Commercial District (N -C). This district is intended to provide areas for immediate day - to-day convenience shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. E -97- St:ction 17.10.030 C. General Commercial District (GC): This district is intended for general commercial activities and services of amore intensive nature. These uses would be located primarily along major transportation routes and would include major shopping facilities, major service - oriented uses, major financial and coroorate headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole. Section 17.10.030 Use Rezulations Uses listed in Table 17.10.030 shall be allowab_a in one or more of the cummercial districts as indicated :n the columns beneath each commercial district. Where indicated with the letter "P ", the use shall be a permitted use iii that district. Where indicated with tl�e ictter *�`�� the t,:,qa shall tj° a ^ ^nr1it10nA1 use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. TABLE 17.10.030 -SE REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL /OFFICE DISTRICTS 115E OP NC GC A. Offices and Related Uses 1. Administrative and executive offices. P P P 2. Artist and photographic studios, not P P P including the sale of equipment or supplies. ® 3. Clerical and professional offices_ P P P 4. Financial services and institutions. P P P L-1 5. Medical, dental and related health P P services (non animal related) including laboratories a -id clinics; only the sale of articles clearly incidental to tte services provided shall be permitted. b. Prescription pharmacies, (also when P P P located within a building containing t:-e offices of 5 or more medical practitioners) 7. Public buildings (library, city. and county P P P bs .dings, special districts and post office). 8. Public utility service offices. P P P 9. Public safety facility (police, fire. C C C ambulance and paramedics). Zi D �. Sr n M, Section 17.10.030 OP NC GC P P P P P C C P P C P P C P P C P C C P P P C C C C C C C C C C f USE 10. 8elatcd commercial uses (5lueprinting, stationary, quick copy, etc.) :vhen incidental to an office building or complex. B. General Commercial uses 1. Antique shops 2- adult business (see special requirements per Section 17.10.n3n) 3. Animal Care Facility (animal hospital. veterinarian, commercial kennel, grooming). (a) Excluding exterior kennel, pens, or runs. (b) Including exterior kennel, per or runs. 4. Apparel stores. S. Art, music and phctographic studios and supply stores. 6. Appliance stores and repair. 7- Arcades (see special requirements per Section 17.10.036 F.) S- Athletic and Health Club, gyms and weight reducing clinics. 9. Automotive services (including motorcycles, boats, trailer and camper) (a) sales (b) rentals (c) repairs (major engine work, muffler shoos, painting, body work and upholstery) (d) Coin -op washing (e) Automatic :vashirg M, Section 17.10.030 OP NC GC P P P P P C C P P C P P C P P C P C C P P P C C C C C C C C C C f Section 17.10.030 -100- .7— USE OP ABC GC (f) Service or gasoline dispensing C C P stations (including minor repair such as tune -ups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers) (g) Parts and supplies - P P 10. Bakeries (retail only). - P P 11. Barber and beauty, chops. P P P 12. Bicycle shops. - P P P P P 13. Blueprint and photoccpy services 14. Boat and camper sales and services. - - C 15. Book. gift and stationary stores (other C P P than adult related material). 16. Candy stores and confectionaries. - P P 17. Catering establisliments. - �j ® 19. Cleaning and pressing establishments. C P P 19. Carpenter shop or cabinet shop. - P 20. Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment. (a) Operated independent of a C - C restaurant (b) Accessory to a restaurant C C C 21. Commercial recreation facilities. (a) Indoor arses such as bowling, C C P theaters, t, ;I a rds, (b) Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis. C C C basketball, baseball, trampolines, etc. 22. Contractor vards (screening of outdoor - - C storage required). 23. Dairy product stores. - P P -100- .7— Section 17.10.030 -101- USE OP NC GC 24. Department stores. - - p 25. Drive -in businesses, including theaters. - C C (other than fast food restaurants) 26. Druo stores and pharmacies. - p p 27. Equipment rental yards. - - C 28. Fast -food restaurants. C C P 29. Feed /Tack stores - C F 30. Florist shops. ? p p 31. Food stores and supermarkets. - p p 32. Furniture stores, repair and upholstery. - ? p 33. General retail stores. - P p 34. Hardware stores. - p P 35. Home improvement centers. (a) Material stored and sold wit;:in - P P enclosed buildings (b) Outdoor storage of material such as lumber cc buildin.- materials 36. Hotels and Motels. C - p 37. lee Machines (outdoor). - C C 38. Janitoral services and supplies. C p p 39. Jewelry stores. - p p 40. Laundry -sel: - service. - p p 41. Liquor stores. - p v 42. K;osks for key shops, film drops, etc. in - C C parking lots. 43. Locksmith shop. - o p 44. Mini-storage for public use (no outdoor - - C storage). -101- Section 17 .10.030 USE OP NC GC 45. Mortuaries and cemeteries. C C C 46. Motorevele sales and service. - C 47. Newspaper and magazine stores, printing - C P and publishing. 48. Nurseries and garden supply stores, - P P provided, in the C -1 district. all equipment, snonlies and material are kept within an enclosed area. 49. Office and business mac hive stores. P P 50. Parking facilities (commercial) where fees C - P are charged. 51. Political or philanthropic headquarters. C C P 52. Pet shad. - P P 53. Plumbing shop and supplies. - - P 54. Photocopy P P P ® 55. Printing shops. - P 56. Restaurants (other than fast food). (a) With entertainment and /or serving C C P of alcoholic beverages (b) Incidental serving of beer and wine P P P but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment or dancing 57_ Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. C C C 58. Shoe stores, sales and repair. - P P 59. Second - 'nand stores and pawn shops. - - P 60. Shopping Center subject to provisons in - C C Section 17.10.030 -II.5. al. Spiritualist readings or astrolo- - - P is ^ecasting. 62. Sporting goods stores_ - P P 63. Stamp and coin shops. - P P -1C2- -103- OP P C Section 17.10.030 NC P P P P P C GC P P P p C P P C - - C P P - C C USE 64. SwimMing pool supplies. 65. Tailor. 66. Taxidermists. 67. Television, radio sales and service. 68. Tire sales and service. 03. Toy stores. 70. Travel agencies. 71. Transportaticn facilities (train and 'bus. C taxi depots). 72. Truck and trailer rental, sales and service. 73. Varietv stores. 74. Vehicular storage yard and tossing service. C. Public and semi - public uses 1. Day Care Facilities 2. Ccnvalescent facilities and hospitals. 3. Private and public clubs and lodges, including YMCA, YWCA and similar youth group uses. 4. Educational institutions, parochial, private (including colleges and universities). 5. Libraries & museums, public or private. 6. Parks and recreation facilities, public or private. 7. Public utility instaP.ations. 8. Vocational or business trade schools. 9. Churches, convents, monasteries and other reizgia— institutions. -103- OP P C Section 17.10.030 NC P P P P P C GC P P P p C P P C - - C P P - C C C C C - C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C -10- E Section 17.10.030 USE OP NC GC D. Accessory Uses 1. Acessory structures and uses customarily P P P incidental to a permitted use and contained on the same site. 2. Accessory structures and uses customarily C C C incidental to a conditional use and contained on the same site. 3. Caretakers residence C C P 4. Amusement Devices, per Section - P P 17.10.030 -F. E. Temporary Uses 1. Temporary uses as prescribed in Section P P P 17.04.070 and subject to those provisions. 2. Temporary office modules, subject to C C C proVIsions in Section 17.10.030 -17.4. Section 17.10_030 Use Regulations for Commercial/Office Districts (Continued) 0 F. Soecial Use ReMulations 1. Adult Businesses. in consideration of approval of any adult business, as defined in Chapter 17.02, a Conditional Use Permit shall be approved for an adult business in the GC District subject to all the standard development requirements unless: (a) Such business is located within 1,000 feet of a college or university, a public or private educational facility, a church, a park or recreational facility, a. library, a post office, or a governmental insdtution. (b) Such business is located less than 1,000 feet of any other adult business. (c) Such business is located less than 1,000 feet from any property in a residential zone or within 1,000 feet of any group of 5 or more d::ellings in any other zone. 2. Amusement Devices. The use of amusement devices, as defined in Chapter 17.02, as an accessory use to a permitted use, shall be regulated based on the following criteria. (a) No more than three (3) devices, but not to exceed five percent (5%) of the public floor area, may be permitted per business without approval of a conditional use permit. Each machine and playing area occupies a minimum of ten (10) square feet. -104- .It- C3 C3 AV5 s bvENu;-: — rn I> rn m - m ;Z:z i n -ta- E OLYMPUS PACIFIC CORPORATION 2110 East Katella Avenue a F.O. Box 3490 a Anaheim. California 92803 a (714) 6344741 November 15, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga P_0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 We are applying for a General Plan Amendment and rezoning of the parcel at the northeast corner of 19th & Hermosa. This action w)uld change the use of this property from professional office to low to medi,:.n density residential. Our proposal for the site is to develop it at a density of approximately 7 to 8 per acre as a quality townhome development. The parcel adjacent immediately to the north, which is also part of our project, is already zoned low to medium density residential. The site across Hermosa to the west is zoned medium density residential and has an approved tentative tract map for 175 condominium ur.its, at a density of 12.8 per acre. Approximately 114 mile further to the west develop- ments of even higher densities are currently under construction. The site is not appropriate for an office use for two reasons. First, it is surrounded by various densities of residential uses ranging from single family detached to attached units of approximately 12.8 per acre. Second, the site lacks visibility from any major arterials, a major requirement for success of this type of project. we are, therefore, requesting that you approve a change of the General Plan and rezoning for this site from OP to LM for development as a high quality townhome project. If I can be of any further assistance, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. DPK:ds Sincerely, OLYMPUS PACIFIC CORPORATION Donald P. Kiely Executive Vice Preside rt 174 N 0 Z i I i n 1'" I Y D i a .. r� �O t•i m -7 u I C. I {4 c 6: i 'lam'` � -• ' I r — +e• ce x.�_Yicr ��••�' tee \: t�'j`i. r 1 =�rrc - • -_ �__- � � a W r 1 y,. 0.4' - 1 a� a` •ry —': a� L• i r a ct+- n 1 q " C n n tin I Ir C!', OR lam• ' (IDS 46 n rn 2i MI n r 2 r� �O C!', OR lam• ' (IDS 46 n rn 2i MI n N r 2 N Cushman & Wakefield of California, hr - 3-W No. Vineyard P.ve., Suite 100 HWM & Ontan(o. CA 991764 � �� .,WL®� 111 JVJJLW November 10, 1983 Mr. Rick Dickason LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY 16152 Beach Blvd. Suite 160 East Huntington Beach. CA 92647 Dear Rick: Thank you for your shone call inquirinz about the state of the office soac.e market in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Currently there is over 750.000 square feet of office space clanned for construction, in Rancho Cucamonga. Barton Development Company has approximately 500.000 square feet planned at the southeast intersection of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The Christeson Company is planning to build 150,000 square feet at the northwest corner of Haven & Foothill. Vista Investment Prooerties is planning aogroximately 60,000 square feet at the intersection of Ramona Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. A couple of smaller projects are also in the works. Currently, of the eight buildings identified as strictly office buildings, there is a 58% vacancv factor. Absorption rates of office space in Rancho Cucamonga have been approximately 35.000 to 40,000 square feet per year. F: ith 124,800 square feet of space in those buildings now available for lease. it will take three years for them to become fully leased. This projection does not take into account previously mentioned new office projects that will come onto the market in the next few years. 1 hope this information is helpful. Sincerely. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF CALIFORNIA, INC. r Scott Davis SD /sm Enclosure GF(A qjq -m No van_ -M a reptesentaW , eq"u or imp9rd Is Made as to the • _curacy of the nfrnmaaon contnmed he . and same a vrDm4rcd wbject to ertora. omdl&- R chwW d prim entaf or odm condf . wandn`.w wnho.a nonce. and to r special 4sting eonahons. imposed by o.a prmcrpals. C ..� 11F11\ s a c _o Z n z D O c a m h cn to `009 01 S 9`c2? y 9@ , fF, SG y0 9y d 0 A� Fy F �F 49 \ \ �yC r. o i 3 z [ 6 p p= iL7 A Z n z O C r, A O Z A M A OR* C 3 -rs D G D r D m r m O n _T n m CA ci D m m L qqoLlz-et E 9 o _ ^ A �= �'n Z f7 d O -n•Ji p nX j7 a n .J�.. � p m rD > w y J^ (D m w a N 3S < o = > v o n y r? y 7 c A H -O. rJ N O '0 C J i T ` N N N _ _ O O O O N O ° N p O O Cl O CD O° O O O N r� O O ° O V O N O O CD O p Cl O O O O O O O W O V V &0 00 O V a V p d C ? O O t c p O ri Cl. p o v c D _ rD N _ D �� � G• S C = C w fD CD (D d .O•.. "7 Z ; Z oC p -3 CD C O " -3 3 _��� O p n] J ri -T« VO O V JC X m �. d N a w cfD n p a � sc H O C CD ro 9ac Ori H N V H O 11F11\ s a c _o Z n z D O c a m h cn to `009 01 S 9`c2? y 9@ , fF, SG y0 9y d 0 A� Fy F �F 49 \ \ �yC r. o i 3 z [ 6 p p= iL7 A Z n z O C r, A O Z A M A OR* C 3 -rs D G D r D m r m O n _T n m CA ci D m m L qqoLlz-et E 9 o _ ^ 11 11 U THE SST GROUP November 23, 1983 83140 Mr. Richard Gomez City Plattner City of Rancho Cucanonga 9320 Baseline Road Pan--!* Ca:cae:onga, CA 9173 Re: G.P.A. Application '830 Z.C. Application #830 Dear Mr. Gomez: CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING Mr. Richard Dickason, Lincoln Procerty Company, applicant for the above noted stbmissions recruests that this supplei;ental economic justification letter be included as part of the above noted files. The applicant proposes to develop 292 condominiun units on a 15.4+ acre parcel located in the NW corner of Archibald Ave. and 19th St. Approximately 21.6+ acres are presently designated P.H. and the remaining 3.6+ acres are designated OF. The above noted applications reflect the a:�plicants desire to change the existing OP designation to MH. If the above noted ZC and GPA are approved the appl4 -ant proposes to proceed with the deveopnent of the 292 condominiun Ir,its. In the en that approval is not €orthcoming the applicant will be compell ed to reduce the size of the proposed parcel by 25% to 219 units. Linder no foreseeable circumstance will the applicant develop offices. Below is Table 1 reflecting estimated fees to the City associated with the development of a 292 unit compared to a 219 unit development. Table 1 Estimated Fees Associated with Development of 292 Condominium Units Compared to 219 units Type of Fee Tract Map Drainage Fee, 15+ Acre x $4050 On /Off Site Signes Building Permit, $11.5 MM - 20 Bldgs PI a.. Check Park Fee, 292 unit x $541 System Fee, 14 x $11.5 MM Beauti fication, 20¢ x 230 M sq. ft. School Fees, $850 x 292 units .14. .R11'.. 11801 West Olympic Boulevard • Total : 292 units 219 units 3,000 60,700 1,000 26,000 16,500 158'000 115,000 46,000 248,000 3,000 45,600 1,000 19,500 12,300 120,000 86,000 34,500 186,000 $674,400 $507, 90O West Las Angeles, Oa.90064 • (213)477 -1901 1�7 -'" -' SW " F T -n LAND DEVELOME. PLANNING It is apparent that reduction in the size of the proposed development to 219 units will result in a reduction of fees to the City of approximately $166,500. It should be noted that an estimated $111,500 of the $136,500 will never be realized by the City, since if the subject 3.6t acres presently designated OP is developed as office the City does not realize -Beautification, Park, and School Fees. The prepos�d development contains plans to develop 114 one bedroom units in the planned 292 unit development. It can reasonably be anticipated ttat demand in City services for one bedroom units, particularly in schools, will be far less than an equivalent number of larger units. In addition to fee intone associated with the develo��cent of the propo :d project, the City can anticipate income the general fund as noted below as the units are cccupied. Table 2 below reflects a project of anticipated income. Tabl e 2 Projected Recurring income to the City From a Coirpleted Condominium Development Source 292 units 219 units Business License 200 150 Property Tax 1,200 1 900 Sales Tax 25,600 2- 19,200 Total : $27,000 $20,250 1 Based on 2 projected appriased value of $15,000,000 Based on estimated total development population of Soo in 292 units. Per capita sales tax income to the City per capita is estimated at $32.00. It will be noted that reducing the size of the proposed project will result in an estimated reduction of recurring income of $6,:50 per year_ It is riot the appl i, anl' s intent to develop to the maximum density permitted ceder the MH designation. L she GPA and ZC application are approved it should be noted that more than 10 acres of open space will be available for parking, passive and active recreation. While the City does not directly participate in fees required by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) it is not unreasonable to infer that non -cash benefits accrue to the City from such fees. Table 3 below reflects projected fees to the CCWO for the proposed 292 unit development and a reduced 219 unit development. 6 PA 11801 West Olympic Boulevard • West Los Angeles, (tea. 90004 • (213) 477 -1901 Vw LAND THE S GROUP LCrVIL AND IDEV EWP`3E SW � Ni PI1\` ING Table 3 Proposed Condoniniun Development Archibald Ave. and 19th St. Estimated Fees to Cucamonga County Water District Sour^e 292 units 219 units Wafer Flan Checks /Inspecticn, $8.40 ea. 2,500 1,850 Connection @ 572.50 /acre 8,790 6,600 Construction 1,000 750 Feter s @ $75.00 ea. 21,900 16,500 Sewer ?la,a Check /InspPCtion, $14.00 ea. 4,100 3,100 Connection g 715,00 /acre .11,000 8,20 FPCiiity @ $950.00 ea. 277,400 208,000 Panstr:rtion 1,000 750 Annexation. $200 per acre 3,000 2,250 Total : $330,600 $248,000 We respectfully submit that favorable consideration of the above noted fPA and ZC will benefit the City financially. As noted in Yr. Dickason's generation justification 1 etter dated November 14, 1963, we believe that the favoral'1 e financial impact vrill be achieved without any material negative impact on the City's overall development objectives. If %e can provide any additional infomation please noti fy me. Very truly yours, Ti`- S!d GROUP Kenneth Mulder cc: Mr. R_ Dickason Lincoln Property Company Pr-, Inc. 16152 Beach Blvd., Ste. 160 East Huntington Beach, CA 92647 11801 Wsst Olympic�Bcsalevard West Las Angeles, Ca 90064 • f213) 477 -1901 .442 — ) / 9 , � G January 18, 1984 Mr. Tim Beedle Senior Planner Community Development Department CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE- G.P.A. CASE #8305B Dear Mr. Beedle: Pursuant to our most recent discussion, it is my understanding that the City of Rancho Cuca.onga would like to conduct further studies in reference to three requests for a General Plan Amendment. Independent study would cause a delay in the aorrova 1 process of approximately 60 days and the cost of the study would be borne by the applicants. In. consideration of the above factors, we would like to ask that our request for General Plan Arendment be read for approval in the Planning Commission's Regular Meeting of January 25, 1984. At Lincoln Property Company, we feel that adequate justification has been presented for a favorable decision concerning our request for General Plan Amendment. Such studies and justification which have been submitted to :ne City of Rancho Cucamonga have included the following: Study on demand and absorption of office professional space in the Ci-v. EconoIL,i^ Justification Study. Results of our contacting abutting single family residents and businesses (presented as latt:rs of supports). E E In asking for 25th, it is Planning Commission suaport and app -.vc,l on January our honest intent tc provide th- City c° Rancho Cucamonga with a highly superior deve.opment which will ccmpiiment the City for many years to come. 6FA I? uIACL'Ldi FFAPtFIY C9AArdAY A.C. /RC. 181s2 BEACH 9Lvo. suITE -SC EAST "uN NG ON EIEACi OS 42647 [714;84,-,Z,9 ....1 { Mr. Tim Beedle January 18, 1984 Page 2 We stand readv to answer any quest'_ons you =v have and look forward to working with you in the future. Sincerely, LINCO/L PROPERTY COMPANY /N/ WILLIAM W. HIRSCH Partner ;YWH ::nn CC: Walt Ingalls Ken Moulder E -21- ma GOW M.R. �� - C -1 , e ' Existma Hardware Store 251D ITA i / }; -3 ....: vacant SUBJECT R -3 PRC3RcRTY Vacant 1 r - isting Shopping Center { Vacant t r44/r= Of Op _mss �G i ALAI. C. WEMICS, M.A.I. MEMBER REAL ESTATE APPRA;SER AND CONSULTANT AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF 2300 E. COLORADO aLVD.. SUITE 3GO REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS PASADENA, CAt-IFORNIA 81107 November 21, 1983 Planr:ing Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box SC7 Rancho Cucamonga, ^z)i_n=n i_ 91730 Attention: Rick Gomez, City Planner Re: Dcar M--- Gomez: OFFICE TELEPHONE )213) 796-3161 General Plan Amendment r "or 3.58 Acres on the west side of Archibald Avenue commencing 412 feet north of Baseline Road Parcels of Parcel map 5792 Assessor's Parcel 202 - 151 -33 On 5ov2mber 15, 1983, we filed an application for a General Plan amend - ment on this property, requesting a change from office to mediu.r., /high residential use (15 to 24 dwelling units per acre). Acacia Construc- tion, Inc., with Henry A. Fredricks and Rick Snyder as principal agents would participate in this project. They have many years of experience of buildinq good condominium /apartment projects. We- have been involved with them in other projects and know they will build a project the city will be proud of and a project which will add to the Spanish heritage of the community. As added background, we have owned this property for many years prior to incorporation. We held it with the thought to develop it with the use that best serves the needs of the community_ This letter is to present some of my personal reasons for this requested amendment. These are as follows: The initial draft General Plan by Sedway /Cooke in 1980 proposed a medium /high residential land use on *_his parcel. At a hearing on : November 17, 1980, I requested a neighborhood commercial use (the underlying zone) for consideration. This was denied and office professional was accepted. Accepting this future use is now con- sidered a mistake. The General Plan also added this office use on 5.4 acres directly across the street at a superior location in direct competition. 2. The General Plan designates five principal office uses; administra- tive, professional, business support services, financial, real estate, and insurance. Three of these uses; administrative, profes- sional and major financial, can attract customers and employment 0 from outside the residential aree.. To be consistent with the goals of the General Plan, these types of uses should be located along Foothill Boulevard or to the south, similar to the locat=ions of general commercial. A better location for most of the professional uses would be adjacent to a hospital. 3. The other office uses; real estate, insurance, some financial, some professional offices and some business support services serve the population by locating within a residential area. These uses do not need to locate adjacent to or be served by neighborhood com- mercial shvZp i.ng. 4. in the subject neighborhood, the best locations for offices are along Baseline, an established office area, and at major intersec- tions. Shown on a neighborhood map following, at seven locations indicated by number, there are vacant land areas or underdeveloped sites, designated for office use. The total area of these vacant land areas is approximately 2i to 25 acres, not including the sub- ject parcel or the parcel at the northeast corner of Nineteenth and Hermosa. This 21 to 25 acres appears more than adequate to provide future neighborhood office uses. 5. The neighborhood map also shows locations colored in blue of the medium to medium high density residential uses directly adjacent to other locations of neighborhood shopping centers. This appear to be good planning which reduces traffic and the need for parkinq. The Alpha Beta neighborhood center at the northwest corner of Archi- bald and Baseline, has only office uses directly adjacent. To this date, the Calmark project has not obtained direct access rignts to this retail center_ This factor seems to be an inconsistency in planning. Consistency with the General Plan Land Use policies would be medium high density residential as the best use for the subject property adjacent to a neighborhood center. 6. Medium high density for the subject property is compatible with the density of the 260 unit condominium project across the street to the east and the Cal-mark apartment project adjacent to the west at an inferior location._ A vice president at Calmark has indicated to me a multiple residential project on the subject property would not by an annovance to the Senior Citizen project on their property. in conclusion, more than adequate office land is nearby and vacant to serve the future needs of the neighborhood. All of this other office land is sunerior in location and would probably be developed before the subject property. As a multiaie residential project, the subject property can be developed very soon and provide good sidewalk access for persons walking between the Calmark project and the Alpha Beta shopping center. Medium /high residential use is consistent with the original draft of the present General Plan. r 71 L J 6 if S+_W 4 _Aq E T_ believe these factors mentioned above present some new material a:. da La for consideration. After a thorough study by the staff, I feel you will reach the same conclusion and recommend this change. Attacum„nt: Neighborhood Map cc: Acacia Construction, Inc_ 270 Laguna Road, Suite 1CO3 r uilc:rton, California 92635 r U u Yours sincerely, Alan C. Weirick, General Partner Weirick Properties Limited, Owner ,Q5- 1 �y e F3 C JY �4 li :'- 1 ice• 11 E Robert Charles Lesser& Co. SIANAGEMENTCONSULTING& MARKET RESEARCH TOR REAL ESTATE January 12, 1984 Mr. Pick Gomez City Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 P- 2617(22CM) SUBJECT:: Market Overview for Office - Professional Land Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Mr.. Gomez: Pursuant to our discussions, we are pleased to provide you with our general approach to performing the subject analysis. We hope this will be useful to you as you prepare your request for proposals. We understand that you are in the process of updating your general plan and that, F-s part of that process, you require an overview analysis of the potential .- demand for office - pruf- essional land uses. This has become a specific concern recently because of increasingly frequent inquiries related to the possibility of zoning changes from the office - professional designation to other designations. In view of this, the objectives of the market overview should be to estimate the potential demand and land requirements for office- professional lan,i uses; to identify key locations for office - professional developruer_t; and to indicate any relevant zoning, changes which should be SCVPE OF WORK To achieve the objectives discussed above, the following services shc:id be performed: 1. Physically inspect properties zoned for office professional uses in Rancho Cucamonga with respect to circulation, access, visibility, and social and environmental influences. 8394 Wilshire Blvd., Third Floor • Be.crly Hills. CA 902_11 • 12 t 1 t,5K.7MK1 A"7 Mr. Gomez January 12, 1984 P- 2617(220Ml Paae 2 2. '3elinea:e the primary and c- ompetitive market areas for Office- prof:assional space in Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Develon the demographic data base for the primary market area related to regional and community levels of population, employment, industrial growth trends, etc., as related to t`:e aemard for office - professional space. 4. Estimate the overall demand for office- profes. <ional space in the competitive market area (i.e., within Rancho Cucamonga, specifically) based upon a combinat: -)n of statistical and judgmental methodologies. 5. Identify and survey, with assistance from city planning staff, existing office - professional projects in the competi+.ive market area with respect to cccucarcy characteristics, project site and configuration, lease rates, and tenant characteristics. 6. Idertify and compile, with assistance from city planning staff, available marketinc data related to relevant planned and proposed office- professional projects in the competitive market area. 7. In light of the above, provide recom^iendations with respect to: Amount of land which should b,: reserved for office - professional uses based on nc%ertial market suppo-rt; Key locations for future office - professional development; Probable absorption rate(s); Zoning changes, to the extent necessary and appzrpr" ate. SCHEDULE AND FEES 'ihe above outlined scone of work could be acccmplished within four to six weeks from authorization to proceed.. Preparation of the final report typically would require an additional two to three weeks. 6 PA ED 11 C1 Mr. Gomez -January 12, 1984 P- 2617(220M) Page 3 N_ The fee for such services would be approximately $5,000 to $6,000, exclusive of direct expenses. Depending on the extent of planning staff assistance with the survey work, the fee would be increased as much as $2,000 to $3,000. Sincerely, ROBERT CHARLES T SSER & CO. Stanley Yon Senior Associate E GPA Ti-OM - aq ITEM E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G�Gns10 STAFF REPORT �?/ s U'I - i DAT=: January 25, 19L'4 19 TO: Chairiman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: E%1VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TEP ATIVE TRACT 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - The development of 121 condominium units on 6.1 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 du /ac) located on the east side of Vineyard, South of Foothill - APN 208- 241 -11. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations, and subdivision map j B. Puroose: Development of 121 condominium units C. Location: East side of Vineyard, south of Foothill (Exhibit "A— ) D. Parcel Size: 5.1 acres E. Existinq Zoning: Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Project Densitv: 19.8 du /ac H. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning• North - Commercial, single family residerce;General Commercial South - One single family residence, vacant; Medium Residential (8 -14 du/ac) East - Apartments; Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) West - Bank, vacant, single family residence; Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) I. General Plan Desiana *_ions: Project Site - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) North - Commercial South _ Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) East - Medium -Nigh Residential (14 -24 du/ac) West - Medium Residential ana Commercial ITEM E �ni. .aiu 1,UN'.11»1UR ZilAr: KCf UK1 TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 /AMERICAN NATIONAL January 25, 1984 Page 2 J. Site Characteristics: This site slopes moderately to the southeast at approximately a 2 to 3 percent grade and is vacant with the exception of mature Eucalyptus trees. K, Apalicable Reaulations: Medium -High Residential district permts condominiums with no minimum lot size and 1.8 parking spaces per unit plus one guest space for every four units. II. ANALYSTS: A. General: This project has been designed in accordance with the tieve opment Code regulations. Emergency secondary access will be provided through a connection with the Butler apartment project to the east. The conceptual grading plan has been designed to drain ttha westerly half of the project out to Vineyard Avenue, pursuant to the City's master plan of drainage. The easterly half of the project will drain on the surface through the southeast corner of the project site easterly through the Butler apartments and into a storm drain pipe at the southwest corner of the Sickels, Stampiey apartment project, as shown in Exhibit OI.,. B. Desi n Review Committee: The Committee has worked with the app icant to resolve concerns relative to the site plan layout, open space, Vineyard Avenue streetscape, and elevations. The project has been redesigned to provide a variety of setbacks from Vineyard Avenue, and the buildings staggered throughout the project to create usable open space areas. The Committee was concerned with the stark appearance of end elevations and suggested several possible revisions such as horizontal siding, false windows or a hip -roof treatment similar to that used in the Mulberry Place project built by American National on the northwest corner of Arrow and Vineyard. In addition, the Committee was also concerned that the upper story front elevations be provided with additional architectural treatments such as window pop -outs on corner windows and selective use of planter boxes to create a shadow line. C. Environmental Assessment: Part 1 of the Initial Study has been comD'.eted by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found that develuor,.ant of the project will increase the amount of surface water runoff and reduce absorption rates; however, the project will provide storm drains ar.i inlet structures to provide adequate drainage. t Ell 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 /AMERICAN NATIONAL January 25, 1984 Page 3 E III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS* This project is consistent with the Development Code and the Generai Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building and site plan, subdivision map, together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Oevelopment Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper. The property was posted and notices were sent to property owners within. 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this prriect. V. RECOMMENUATIGN: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and elements of iii_ project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attac,1ed Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be aopropriate. Respectfujly sub�nitted, Rick Gomer City,Planner RG:DC: jr .Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial "All O' B" 11 C" "Y "Ete "Fit "G" „y„ 111 11 Stu - Location Map - Site Pho *_os - Site Utilization Map - Subdivision Map - Site Plan - Landscape Plan - Grading Plan - Elevations - Drainage Map dy, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions 11 r -3 CI 1-T OF RAC CIHO CUCANIO\GA Fig \-NTNING DID OON NO,TZrH ITE- %1, _! LZ4 i o TIVU: "AMOhi !4&? EXHiRFr: _jA-_ SCAL.E= a -= AF -&I [J 11 El ..r 1 � I ..�Lr N.. L.�...[.r I /R!�r.���'�- ✓C.2':Y 1 MC • K_v.HUT f] we" ❑ Rutw JK_Vy...r 1 •F%157. ZON! K3 . \• .\ 1 E =1ST tl5F 'VACAH i \ v. c M 'i � v • C L I. � ,NORT-H CITY Of ITE.l is -- r l z 4 RANCHO CL:CA�e,,JO G.-�, TrrLz: PL-VNI ING DIX -NON EXHIBIT:- CIO IF- i. E ii reuiwaa. +Lao. •2 = �3�,�,� I:Ie.Z a.. �_ .- _�� 4# K.?3 a •• E'�n� ?,. `, •' �•tf l: a ._t,lt. w c.l _ 1� . S. u*. =c a �_ n.� �r ^ 1 L Al 3 4i• i ` e��_ef_ - ., i - vc-_._ -`V -- ;�•=r —: -�� —,cam - -'i \ n 1' . .!`i; el ••�` �'s[5`' iii^ - `�ti'.i .-ai: I. t \. �T SS n Z tom iyZ - Fi - , a �•sd I:. L k. n + � 5 1 1 I� ; 1 .�2 a . � > i � � 7 � C? � 'y: Jam. � • �� ��... �.w .... • iF '� Gs � � iL �r S i pp V NORTH CITY OF Ir m49 o �) RANCHO CUCAN IO\G -A TITLE: S yept y l 9U )W MAP PL NTNI• \G DIVISION EXHIBIT-_ 12 SCALE: JE -'7 _.�= a _ _* 'c, �7.tWS.i 2, S3 SF ( « —lamer A+'FA ouY) -ac G f. , -* St !trlG SuMMAef Q4'L 6 �M1iis a i.� CITY OF RA`CHO CIr;CAI•I® \GA PLAINT NK3 I3 -%rmN E ejlgCc Etirc Y Ann-64-151T. �I RC7. scleC6 � saCi . 'JD� �'lD 5< c0 ss.S I cro =m• /.•L; C-'5f NORTH 1T£\ 1: TL 1 EXH1131 : _e_._ SC.,LE= wm° _ E -S 11 u L"ll I, r T ra� � .u,+v.♦ ra ti..-ec � ..e..o m�e. e.._s: -e r' CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.,L\,IONO. -k PLANNING DIX'LSpaN TITLE- ExIiINT. SCALE-. ' Fr9 NORTH C] _�! I � `l ( /��� �> �' , i L 1. /\ 7 � �/ ��r' 4 I of ���!�-� + •ems,,;. -' �/III •�. 7 I � .} / -, �iI !t" _ III ,� I�� �'I •h:� • UJl li'1 I't'�I f�f��'•+1 S_— �7.' �.� I'M INAKY GiZA0ING`P1 AN=TIZAC1Ti'17490 \aRTH CITY OF ITL\ I: 77 1Z R.A \'CHO CL;C _k'N 10\G ,-L TITLE,- PLA PLANNING i. \G DR'LStON EXIURIT =_451_ SGXLE: JE - %o j AMON I s 3 � R Y 1 rt 4 t Z l t i , l i �1 a F 7Y C T Z 1 4 y a h a � s a J e� I i i Pte, ?ccc_� Al d - � i I + l • 111' -µ—, I I .ry. 1p JON S r ruu a-r � -ilalT I Pr<"J P05GD ?; °� °.�Tit4Gttl2E / .4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAkiG..NGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP NORTH HENI: IN qa 49 b T ,-t-E: jMAj Aja EM AA Ap iIBIT-_ SCALE_ eeV t -i2 C It Foo-rNiLL d . .- fib \�l i Pte, ?ccc_� Al d - � i I + l • 111' -µ—, I I .ry. 1p JON S r ruu a-r � -ilalT I Pr<"J P05GD ?; °� °.�Tit4Gttl2E / .4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAkiG..NGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP NORTH HENI: IN qa 49 b T ,-t-E: jMAj Aja EM AA Ap iIBIT-_ SCALE_ eeV t -i2 C 7K El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI•InNG_. INITITiL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fcrn.i must be completed and submitted to the Deve lop ^ent Review Co=ittee through the department where the prcject application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analvsis staff will prepare Par,. II of the Initial Studv. Tne Development Review Com-aittee will meet and take acticn no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Ccmmittee will make one of three determinations, 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and -a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further in`_orna- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Moll grPoy NT' APPLICAQT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Msrth, Crh ^4pdar, Am.ariran National Cnrnnratin„ 405 So. Beverly Drive 8everl v Hills �C,al * 00 7 2 ;�a3 g�i7 &?AP�CTED NAME, ADI�RSS, 'l LEA r?�iQ O_ PERSON Cr,NCERNING THIS PROJECT: "'ar'ha S�hrieders LOCATION ME PROD -=CT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PAR = NO.) LIST .OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL„ STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Nnt knr—ir I-1 JE —1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION i DESCRIFTIO N OF PROJECT: ,a i en :a commur,jty or _ 144 dmell91:0 unit'' an[ rorraa -irn are8 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF Aiv'Y: o acres or Droject. Aporoximateiy i-12,9H Z.UUaT_ 'If NeVj construction. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRC=:';ZNTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOPUATIOti ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANI- -LPALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): L L U K L a 0 " �ign of dnimal a '. tat701L. n known ru I Is the project Cart Of a larder ProjeCt, One Of a series of cu ^ulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant enuirormental i,zoact? No. 1-2 E- f4 11 WILL THIS PROJECT. YES NO _ _✓ 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ L/ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for _ municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? t/ 4. Cre "te changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? Change zoning to conform with general plan_ _ 5. Remove an existing trees? How many? see landscape plan_ 6. Create t_he need for use or disposal of potentivI ly hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamnables or explosives? Explanation of anv YES answers above: �- ra1 Plan designation_ -• uC CD to De •remove . ere wi.: e many otner IMPORTANT: If the proj( ;ct involves the construction of residential units, compiete the form or. the next page. CERTIPICAT'CN: I hereby certify that she statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infoi -mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the b,:,-:t of my knowiedge and belief. I furi�er understand that additional informazicn may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the D,,elopmant Review Co :rnittee. Date_ Z d j Signature A _ Title Virc Vroci inn I -3 E -m. RESIDENTI ;�L CONSTRUCTICN The following inforzat *ion should be provi'ed to the City o_` Rancho Cilcamonca Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the sch^ol district to acceri.^,.odate the proposed residential development. - �U4fQ Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. / • i � Specific Location of Project: ��JrvEY /J�CD QvE�+r�� 5 1. NL.ber of single family units: 2. Numher of multiple family units: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 �` fr 3. Date proposed to % _ --i begin construction: Z'" / 4. Earliest date of Occllpancv : Model " and 7 of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range TT `� -- Ac— -721 L L PHASE 4 TOTAL I -4 E -its i RESOLUTION NO. 0 A RESOLUTIONi OF THE PLANNING -OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. CONDITIONALLY 9PPROVING 1ENTATIVE TRACT XA? NO. 12490 �:yEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12490, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Pmcrican National Corporation, applicant, for ttp purpose of subdividir.g the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Cali °ornia, described as a residential subdivision for Condominium purposes of 5.1 acres of land located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill into 2 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on January 25, 1984; and WHEREAS, t,ie City Planner has reco.. vended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Enginee:•in.g and Planning Division's reports; and WY'cREAS, the Planninq Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division'- reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the P:ann.ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as foliows7 SEC [.'-ON 1: The Planning Commission makes t!ie follo:•+in5 findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12490 and the Van tt,ereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The desigi or imorovements of the tentative `-act is consistent wit': the General Plan and specific )tans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the typ, of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damaje and avoidaLle inju ^y to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) Toat this project will not create adverse impacts on is the en- ronment and a Nenative Declaration is issued. c -17 SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 124 90, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to ail of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planninq Division 1. Revised elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the DEsign Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Letter of acceptance of secondary (emergency) access from adjacent property owner shall be required prior to recordation. Said access shall be orovided in accordarrc ;,ith Foothill Fire Protection District standards. 3. Dwelling units shall have a minim,,um 150 square foot private open space. 4. Project shall provide recreation area /facility and eneroy conservation features as required by the Development Code_ Details shall be included in construction plans and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The tot lot shall be relocated adjacent to the swimming pool. 6. Details of the carports, recreation building, tot lot, and laundry building shall be included in the construction plans and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Perimeter fence.on the southerly tract boundary shall not exceed eight (8) feet, as measured on the south side. Any fencing above eight (8) feet in height shall be constructed of wrought iron or tubular steel that is non -view obstructing. Engineering Division: 1. Vineyard Avenue pavement shall be reconstructed to conform to existing City standards for a secondary highway on both sides of centerline. The structural section shall be determined by a soils report prior to final approval fo the improvement plans. The west side of Vineyard shall be widened as necessary to accommodate four lanes of traffic with a left mourn lane. 2. A drainage pipe may be required to be installed in Vineyard to accommodate_ flows from site to daylight downstream with an cutlet structure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. El &1Q APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF Jr%NUARY, 1934. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the Foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting cf the Planning Commission held on the 25 *_h day of January, 19 84, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 11 -IQ E-, O 0 5� u O C U E c 0 V V CID N O i a v ( J ,J dA,r ° UC d9N C -T 2 ✓gym °: o °^ " °� j: ° a q - ✓ LCm ✓i qG C q q =Lrn °n V� T v'� w ^�° ✓„_y 7 ^L_ W ���q jam' �C > ^ ,° °a G TG ��cN ✓ _ =y Ns G-, q✓ q 27J Macq Nu _ °' I =...q y-cJ yO.d fOn, ✓O'y ✓fy Va- � ^- - r�a T O G 0 n O O IS r✓ C 9 N 7 l �✓ T_ J 9 y C s r 4 V V G C` •", v, N q V a C O O _ n < V j N= 9 q? O ^ V O ✓J D E L - � G 3 - d _� .a a✓° � r r?✓ W] J ty a E q d W � S l N a ^_ L O � O �✓ - •�--1 D V � O O r d � O a a C O n L O V Oq O w. C d S 4 0 V - ✓✓ 1-20 Q q N O d q N V y q L ^ O f ^ L ✓ ° V G V..L.. G1 .G.' O' _ O '� c^ r yC r q ✓ '�. O ✓ ^` 7� a C ^ O i -'O` V N ✓C L N q � q J dL S A N C ✓ �� 4 d L^ L� _� L L P✓ O Q y r M N .-. ,Ln J d �' U Ci •..1 ¢ � � ✓ � O v J� G Y q � `dC�J VC T,Ji� O q N A r. N �- O O C L � -_ ✓ O .� O '�'.� � l 9� n6 -° O,✓0 L yr' N ' C G✓ .� N O I L .✓ 00 � 9 q d G L y O C Z N O 4 " q G ^N NOS OUr y,LLL L�ON J .y0 g dci .y�YV rpDO �Od O q> _^ -C,o E ✓ Tyr OrN t 9L.r� E N c f n°L J `O `. T, 23 L- .O _ ^Vi C✓ T inL.. -�„ ^L PG Gu Li p O G" O C �G� rl a v S 6 0 6 idr J 0 ` o✓ `J ✓�� y° Q N d r .n G U 0 ,.. m i u^ _ r V u r O O. O_ ^� q G 9 N V N >� v C F > r✓ t Q� = N ` r L qF ✓ —� 'J rno 4 —N : >oq qa C n °� ni . -rnq.T. -Tg- —u- = ; 6N�O COgO 6 p 6 6t6 6JSV KN6a Qe,rO 6a O-N -M{Y LNG E-, O 0 5� u O C U E c 0 V V CID N O i a v ( J ,J dA,r 'T UC d9N C -T 2 G_UO G G_ O q a - ✓ LCm ✓i qG C q q J T T V W �C > ^ 6 ✓ q G 0 J C " r✓ C 9 C 9 y a O N d G q C O l � O ✓` 7 ° 6 O � 4° U a✓° � r r?✓ W] ty a E q d � U L O � C �✓ P F C O f ^ L ✓ ° V G V..L.. G1 .G.' O' _ O '� c^ r yC r q ✓ '�. O ✓ ^` 7� a C ^ O i U Ci •..1 ¢ � � ✓ � O G � r O P 23 L- 4 C N C. E s��� ✓oa_rW ��^ e� °6 v ^ OL !ry LTL Vf OT V L up7'L_ _ C- ✓ � W n- N A C✓ n C C' p ^ - ✓ M VV° L F � � E O i ` ^_ � .n u O a L O i ✓ _ ✓�-'.- g V C C q A T p L ✓_ A aqN _ nnL qCw OV.>. a_ °VOPV Gym -N- dLUVN✓ E. �C n =-•.' A9 � _ ac N c�� � ° N- coo = =' _' -,,;✓ -- uu_�: °° v�o _- � F' c G r G= -• L r` - n � C r - ) V O r rn ^C C O r O � V �L O i� .. aC ✓. ✓�O -9 - iCp r- � L i Cu O L Gr rLr CU ✓ e° c �'^ > u u r o� -> d V E w� N U O- n m •7 � v q L N D c✓ .o T p a -. -_ .V+ - -� - E C� L Tr ✓ V L.n O r N J 9 n L C N= C L " rVi. V` t O U W � N O ` C C=i �. ✓. �( A O- >y VVif - -oyV A�gAy OV✓ L.�uq 0j =_ 'O�- ✓9 Vd0- ° 'r ✓ q V=C C� a ✓i -V VG -_- L..r LO A p � V' C = N F� [ O ✓ f a u n 9�- w. q 0 0 .°r ° V A °r r •V.. i .J. r o s. ( F C V L -. A A> M G+ O✓ O nt O E V L'. O L j` fvP L r O q W L � � O � V r r F✓ O N V l D D T A V rLir . E r c L C L n l °• � O g C V C? n W� r'O '_ -° - V � .-. N O I N O f S O V „ C n p V 6 L .O ti= q C) a p i✓ L P ,r y L G r° - r L O L= A d = W O > .r V O !' E ^ q f V✓ ° NI 7 P rn = �' 9 o � _✓ � L ✓ s � Pr � � O t w q V6 __ L r ` a r rn 6r N ° � ✓ u rr mI d V -j „ia � ..r O L � p = V T. � i O V � ... j dL �� TGN> ` M "•- JSQECN prr ��V��`� 90 Cam✓ VO -CVO Q =0 - _l jN 79 .1; V .� Va aw. O u� ��_Cr ✓ ✓ A Yv.O� ✓_ Ywr OA N� =_� °d N d V ..' - q T _PD � L -V r C V C N VJ t O?V ✓� LO V L 7 -� -• v ✓ w ' d A Nr O ONE j W -J - `� V O L A O N N✓ - - JO >rLN .- 4. .•- _ - �_ � - >� •-�� O V• LN N t M L✓ Y-L pOL G6 09 2 N L c S- L 6 C 6E ✓O- � O - IN C 9 ° P > C V S C Q O V O O N V. d✓ 9 � q S 6r v °4Nr -✓ Gr rL, - V WaL p• D O N n W i C 3 E✓ T F S V 9 W- q d P r E U L° O C ✓✓ L Y c Q 9 L l C C n A Q c V C O N - > -". A O ° y N y N ESE uc HN'.2c!✓ ^•E.l -rG NO Np r• O_ Q dC. N qq Vp au V✓Fq LQ q j rV Nl` u -y°r�V N d�M° ✓Cy �-- =1]> V Q 'A r OA ✓ � W c�9 V9 O•r C9U L .Lire W tj-- -PO N= o O c c 9 C' O q O � E j 9 C � o a q✓ � S O U VNO N6CN •-" c °° A L .'L.°- = A L - �- >ara dE.- •^ >•� r^ `^ - Gl c WV -YPC✓ > 4 ���qa... 'r^��L un N O E 0 O qi _vn - V g L ✓V• �n�_� C N..s 2 O`pCv -�O _ Cc A V L C C C L C � F C -� 7✓ q L- n °aye cLUG' ouL Lc _ �L = ✓�W _ `. O rC =N Vrr -LA CC- V' �' Tl 6r C O Q'�- N�� N •O 4 ^ Q L� A J d= -� t NS✓ C O ^� N O N PV �pC✓ rA N ~_ L N j L c q _` C°r C V✓ C' D 6 n c�= C d° O V O> r � N^ .." c Cd oO✓ N 0 0 ° C V C E C A O ✓l -- N � 6 p U G¢ I u° - .°ir O V Cn -� q ✓ .l O W -J A P L ✓ -_ c � a _T76V OW_ D Ar N� c� n� P -' ^ ✓tli r vi N C. E cn CG Td_ P L A�L>. Va N✓ .� � NUJ ^Ji V� dL ^J✓ V N9 6U yNnp ^1�{{L'I C 7 2 N n 9 .Oi• 6 EYULL A_ °� � CV rpD \_. O ^:LO >v �6Vr i1 .vGU Z oc „✓ Vv _ r Z °d D r 6' r ^ .Ui. V G n✓ C Ell, L j C a.V y fl'JOG OVA N 2' V✓ � v A y a' G' C> ..� ` d ' d n D d a T✓ O 7 n C J� mo p � q y C A N= S 6_ c V q O' i Qi �_ ✓ L > y ddr :� A.... j, Vi ✓_� _V ✓oo✓ vu _ c✓—c p ^V � E.. qA ✓r G� � C Lys �Cp F� T 4L Nu ✓ � _ _ v. i N C ✓nC .. PO Tj �OC G^ V6 `d Ne NO N •+ AO J 4 >, N qV�c G••OP r✓ 'n E >��✓ � V U 9 <�nN yCV CrV p'nc� O nN N 9l T• y M V✓ O_ O >, i 9 _ _ E .L• A >t P 0 V - a C C C PLC i y u A� CD 1_O dC� TuN ~^"aq NYO G • £_� u C ^ P N A< P A u A =N ' A ✓ t _ cY'J^ Ems^ uL n>�P �c0 VVC UN N C� °qr EO6 �O iPP ° ^v c. u' u q•rC C'•^L PAC �° iC Qar q °,. u w>o o�4 .°. F. aac sc ^— ..`.cv "2:,_ _'^r ✓.A.r °n« c^ so 'u cd "•d.c � UGC+ =° n �qr °�c a��O uv° <u u� ...A s.°•� —•' Fcc nc tam' oa°i. <e�oc tea.°+ L-na �.. O _ N ✓ T d d C P ^ C C d� V� t P L �' O V l Y q•�VC CO L^ OG9 O !.]OAO CO q CTGG N n Cq y C i Y _ A V� d� ^Ci d ` ✓ ✓ V� L 0✓ ° V✓ C r C ^6r ✓�✓V _J V C ` Q✓ M O .`. 6. S G G u ^. V V ° � C P C A L v q V O . d 6 M1 C V' Y N ✓� Q✓ P ✓ P A O n2' `a' °c ^. e ` c do ° 'oi —i �., ^c O P E' W d O_ r d V � c0 'S q✓ C L_ C 4 ^ A p Jf ^ q _ r` u'T^ N u V OVCNV `i `OF ACD ¢L''Q ✓ L<jN Chu V � �j0 °d T N p✓ _ i q t' N y L ✓ O s D r C° E O z L i is ✓D_ ._eVG �. Oyb M 4i V�r G H V.�i.�A�� _ C LTO ` c N V`� N u L ✓ ✓ C '`_° J T ^ C y= S L O C I U V G P `ten N V L`-.V ay �• ^ yL_t ✓nom COC��O v Cu C >NU „'yNV GL q.2 A� ^u `o c =r u✓ �nr c_.. oc DiduNN o .°..' � —` ... ^..� _L c G ° j c°! �Am ✓ V 6�r Z L9 �ON�A 0✓ 6N6A �.adN OnY�n�NAN 4N� Gr^ _ QN j�ndd � C! 4\ M cn — V (n O L V C• C'' P O C• i P Cn > L C C V d C L E C •r n •L.. O, GJ, C � U ax _ wO. fC,, OV L P^ uC•O. EF ' n ♦. V V O? P a r C n C u McNn d n 9 V 9 m G-'✓ — W ✓ i d f T 7 G 6✓ O O n C = V i. u — ✓ V n' C ^rry J O✓ O d C b r J d 9 V 7 `--0- '� i O >• N 4 0`� O N d� O w Jp c C 6 •'•, � J' ' L J P L r E ��� Oc Pn Cd _d COnW G�� M q_ O � N J U •> C P O O L °• i_ O u ' N' O N' >C'N� uCO, �I dCC �L.—i• =u OJ PF C•L Nd �y L�7•e iw� - On ^�LP7 . � >^`f� T✓ 1e° - -v, i n`i.. Wtivd 3c. .:4 °' L. vii ci�pic.`^ cmLi cfi�o � y E•L.�J � S d � U u p C ✓ G� O C_ C �c- N I o� � b¢3 � ��'•� �vcn yCi I -rOS _ dLV O O .� P I C l.✓ y� Pdi O =_ N - +r.,LV OHO dV �OV n CI CGb y `N _e•, LOUD .eN no`" = — ✓ p I G� � Y V¢C I y0� O ^V i U j � �Or v •n U S r C •" u d d S n '� Elu• ,n 00 P� � � C�•''u �`VN vN Expo N 'L'e n ` y I v•T• � dj c` -� � '° .C'.. u ~ O a• V i' r G_ V Q^ I 9 O — j C V � C .u+ [6 V V` ~ L-J I E 7I i V V✓_ _ NL— `r ?. G_'-.. QI ¢ I VOA ✓i �— C '—pL SOuC r�VC •- `C Nei O vL r C 'u V ii °C =_ CyjC VV C+NO � -C�.T� F� V` V rViO CL'C o m_ mS,°. cLd c°.n -� <o iac Lc$� n —✓ �� � �e uW c'u�� ri n� I I 1' CI ..EIEt .L•6 > I I Sip .nom .�' O ❑Vw.� � N �p • ' ✓I �( �f ` Uy'i cl _ y CI •� W., I � i Na a s m ✓ a I i II Z 1 °a �^ �� EPT^ - cd"G c- a ✓om,� ew �I :� I m�a✓N..o� °E LG dT o., �o N N I J I I I 6 t` i NO y p G C� �UVV ✓-�� ,✓ GO 6n C?ni n _ r I u I I QINI I O� 7i rY u0 � i 1 G�TO �` y ti� i� I r�V.' d VAN Cy.9 ✓V ^d d Z° GJ I I C ° ... "•c'cm >� �N c -_ ... i qd °' NV, r ui �1 i r�l __ S �a�ic �u � I -A9 - °.m o� ✓cc w No "' ES I I r Y 94 x NE ✓` m.- I ^.°. =._ I�/ I G9� 9 M iy' 1 a N C i� d > L N .y .W.r b V G V d G V w v V v, m> b ✓ E O C ✓c G° 7 1..1.1 ! Pvm Y ^cF� O O.�u «— I o Y• �� � « '+ y cam°,- r ✓r oa- r I N ja OPa qi� >C G G V d ` V`V do i ✓L9. 1 N 6 `ZyI1 c..c co �`-�.' o °° °o s ."o�✓. o - - �° � io^ aN ` c dr J V l •� Q Gr O^ � V_ C r NOr P —..n✓ Nom' N T - dI .7V ^ ✓ d c ^�.. _° 9 N y 9 9✓ C P O <� G I I V V � V L G�> r 9 O q a T _ w• I ° ^ u7i O� C d i . � � ^ N O 4 oe ` N ..aid �cvN ".n GCS i -. orn ! ed nN Nri =v d� >I n- V a+ 65 E^ c o W m a a < 0 0 0 ��� 0 ! .� c A �+I ^ I � -^ q rI 9I I I 1..N VO 1 GI OI WI J W., r a • .=o �. s i ^ °OC — F, I -- .�� Gtll L — c d A rn — 1= I O 6 o a •J P F° WaI �a I I _ Y P y � o N — — Y, u V q y 9 9 - q N G° q V = y c O V O w V W ♦•>`..�i L i°a O P c L =.. r �C> GVC OV C'n q -•T• —_ .V..v OLD a.T O 6nN Q.n Wy G 1Nr Y— rr 116i Gr° 6� �q..{i O I =i I a acv roc Nu N«.` a ... oy L c.`a as oo rr «c� c a ' w� ` �L `oaa� .�.• — c 4 zv, c° o C1V 75 F Nays i* J V N q W V d o °` I6 .+ N �/ F✓ V Y. G — N° L Y u c M N V V Oy� y N V° °V—JJ =O.r C•_L �� °a° VOO� VC L I fig` COOTr �L qV C Cr C° =W G= r�r1p••C a6tV V� O'•CL.Li a O+ L•: -, cvJ`4 L ✓� I r GtJ�I_r� �°c�V LCGw —Q CNLyr ° i;J — n ~lLr o � cE` o m °w a V t 6. _ N I� a •n �° O` F a 6 n O° G_ a G — �. P S '.N rLdvO qLa Ta �— uNU M��L c_- � n.L+ I O _au Cn —_ CcJ N t V�NW —fir LTW N =_Y `V PVq 6wV N6�q Gr NO.L+O NNV 6�.+Y -4V 6� WrNL 41' Z; 3n V•J QI i 0 V G .r7 O L C 6 `d o v °" °• ° cc o c N O w F �w° N d Q C � V O• O_ L p r d _° I d C q C L q n 4 d^ C C N I . C I O�C I yam^ yy plpdV =lI Gd C�.p.. � a 6 Ll E. 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12577 - PILGRIMS - A custom lot residential subdivision of 16 lots one acres of land in the "L" District (2 -4 du /ac), located on the south side of 19th Street, west of Hellman Avenue - APN 202- 0C1 -03 and 52. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Tentative Tract Map, and issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Purpose: Residential 'land subdivision into 16 lots C. Location: South side of 19th Street, between Hellman Avenue and aery� Street D. Parcel Size: 4.24 acres E. Existinq Zoning: "L" (2 -4 du /ac) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surroundino Land Use and Zonin : North - Single family subdivision, "L" District South - Vacant, "L" District East - Beryl /Hellman drainage wash, En Agape Church, "L" District West - Single family homes, "L" District H. General Plan Desiqnations: Project IIZ Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) 197; - Low SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12577 - PILGRIMS - A custom lot residential subdivision of 16 lots one acres of land in the "L" District (2 -4 du /ac), located on the south side of 19th Street, west of Hellman Avenue - APN 202- 0C1 -03 and 52. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Tentative Tract Map, and issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Purpose: Residential 'land subdivision into 16 lots C. Location: South side of 19th Street, between Hellman Avenue and aery� Street D. Parcel Size: 4.24 acres E. Existinq Zoning: "L" (2 -4 du /ac) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surroundino Land Use and Zonin : North - Single family subdivision, "L" District South - Vacant, "L" District East - Beryl /Hellman drainage wash, En Agape Church, "L" District West - Single family homes, "L" District H. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) North - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12577 January 25, 1984 Page 2 El I. Site Characteristics: The property is currently vacant and slopes to the south at approximately 4 percent. Vegetation on the site is limited to indigenous shrubs and weeds, except along 19th Street where a rew of Eucalyptus trees exist within the future right -of -way. II_ ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, Pilgrims Enterprises, Incorporated, is requesting approval of a 16 lot residential subdivision. The project is the first tract to be submitted and designed in accordance with the basic development standards of the "L" District. Typical lot widths vary between 60 and 70 feet, and variable front yard setbacks from 20 to 30 feet are shown on the map. The average lot size within the tract is approximateey 9400 square feet, well above the 8.000 minimum average. The Hellman /Beryl wash exists to the west of the site and an existing flood control easement crosses lots 9, 10, and 11. The width of this easement will be reduced with construction of the Hellman / Bervl drainage channel, so development will not be precluded on any lots. the channel is slated to begin construction this summer; :However, a condition of approval is provided to guarantee adequate flood protection for the subject property in the event the map records before the channel contract is awarded. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee recommended approves o� the project with the condition that variable front yard setbacks must be recorded on the final map. In addition, the Committee recommended that a slight bend be provided in the street to add greater interest and variety to the streetscape. In response to the Committee's concerns, the engineer redesigned the tract with a bend in the street and variable front yard setbacks, per Development Code standards. 0. Growth Man agement Committee: The Growth Management Committee recommended approval of the tract map with the conditions as specified on the Resolution of approval and standard conditions form. With development of the project, the developer will be responsible for installation of a catch basin on 19th Street and an outlet storm drain device to the proposed Beryi /Hellman drainage channel. Regarding the street design, the Engineering Division required that the cul -de -sac be designed to provide access to a parcel south of the tract map. In addition, the right -of -way for the new street must be expanded to 60 feet versus the 50 feet currently shown on the map. Conditions of approval: are provided on the attached Resolution for your consideration. F- Z r LJ E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12577 .January 23, 1984 Page 3 D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee approved the conceptual grading plan as shown on Exhibit "D ". Since unit designs and plotting have not been submitted at this time, grading for individual building pads was not permitted. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been compieted by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse impacts related to the development of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are supported by the following f:c:ts: The proposed subdivision, in conjunction with the conditions of approval, is consistent with the current development standards of the City. 2. The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed number of lots within the subdivision. 3. Adequate street and storm drain improvements will be provided to make the project compatible with the surrounding area and improve circulation and drainage in the vicinity. 4. The project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the basic development standards of the "L" District in which the site is located. Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 3�6 feet of the subject site. In addition, public hearing notices were posted of the property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. F- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12577 January 25, 1984 Page 4 RFCOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the P'.annin; Commission conduct a public hearing to cc:isider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respe47%. V s milted, Rick Ggqm�nez� Ciiy Pj3arner RG:CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "6" - General Plan and Development Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions Districts Map F— t� L1 C :] u RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C'JCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12577 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12577, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Pilgrims Enterprises, Incorporated, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision on 4.24 acres of land in the "L" District, located on the south side of 19th Street, west of Hellman Avenue - APN 202 - 041 -03 and 52 into lE lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action cn 25th day of January, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Pap subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga dces rc-solve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard tc Tentative Tract No. 12577 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. c_c Resoluticn No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on th.e environment and a i4e9ative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12577, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Plannina Division 1. Variable front yard setbacks, per the "L" District standards of the Development Code, shall be recorded on the Final Tract Map. 2. A minimum depth of 100 feet shall be provided on Lot 8 in accordance with Development Code requirements. Ercineering Division 3. The Final Tract Map shall be revised to provide a 50 -foot right -of -way for the interior street. 4. The developer shall be responsible for the installation of a catch basin on 19th Street and outlet storm drain devise to the proposed Beryl /Hellman storm drain.. The required easements will be the responsibility of the developer to obtain from the adjoining property owner. 5. The developer will be installation of adequa from the Beryl /Hellman City channel project construction by the recordation. responsible to bond for the to flood protection demises storm drain channel, if the has not been awarded for City Council prior to APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSIO1: OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary W-- _(. Resolution. No. Page 3 I, Rick Gomez , Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1934, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 `J e . 97 c _ c G T C _ v V - V L �..N _ _ v I ✓ n CV V °C6• Pa�O � �� _ - TEL Q ci q C ' O V O q -< ✓ N O T r .. f 7 - - 6. . 2 q O J NaE n N- � V � •� k q V � _ - ` T L qd _ _ - L P✓ q" cv c -_ qL nP9 O'C >•' Oq J�- NCO - ° CN C _- ' =C _O EC __VL ;�C O>�Nl 'J�J N�� iCT LL �O ✓T nnO J.n 00 ^6 .0 i^G -J •n LZ"J 'n6CL �OVO - �a _`\ C VV .VqC OVV _- qC = Cq C _r c0 A n „�O N O - -J ✓ C�j _' .J _ tf L c M=•v coq'o L a c4L.G ¢�nL. \¢1.�a a \¢`q�c I I 1 ( I I I I SE N G D..r -- � I ` y �.qO Cam_ GUO ✓G 2C T �L vo _- d✓ I = ". O V _ lV I V '-.� ._ M � n - _ - c � v -• - c i V im• o C ^- C -� O f-C - L Nu I y N G60 VEVE VGV -6LG =• n'•O 6 � S L - ✓I O� M I1 1+I \vj 6 C r h v Y V r, L G q - T O V_ d O.✓ - d i q O � _ V Fu0 OL ^,L OG r E � _ ✓ V ✓ b q- O G � E V O ✓ U V q �YVC,�C O�LL N E M E c.`. +-� L 4- N C r_ LC q0 40 Gp _VL =-sC �O 'S Oj o��C LP4 C+ O _ OC <F ✓6 _t GC�GG b O - _ O OWN v� v V u J ^ C W q _ i_rt GC P q r✓ C V Gq T'O q gO�rCL V-r - 4 - _ { c= 4 ✓ o -j.n NL ` L C T✓ W i N u �• O C � � j�NVi .n O�VL G lOi C V C._- -_ V✓nO PV - _ V 4 � `J G G N V✓ y' C _ _ _ n L ✓ _ci O�'r EU�gN C_ tr 6O�Vq N r J u L 0= V C f n_ G J TC j n- ar LP U M C O u p V l _•F O u.d- oM✓ �u= � -o ✓LO- 'J - G - O a -N -n ' - rdcu.n oo TU C _ coc d - J C oqy . C _ P � ayct t d L _ L G V C N c c c M q < c T � C - S > ACC .0 G q � V V V _ L- u V✓ C q N d L u d ✓ q L �-., n M` C V O 9 C V � 7 j T „} jq _T Cy =V N NCO LC CV - -__Onq N .6.r CLG V _P`5 z: q ✓� _ V G C � `7 q G __ � _j V v C GG i- L C �• C i j i .r 7 C i C - ✓Ln q �V ✓VOU Tr ^r 0.., r` _ 1C E -` C o`c is;. -� cc �v riid..cc ✓vd P�gL..cn,- we ✓I <��� Nqq �V Jr96d ru ��YNCS P� <6�6V N. J �V O � C L 4 C i W n O 7 � C n C G C d q � c 'Oo V G - q 4 _ U C S L O b = J p ✓ L O u C ^" O c o c Pov N � ✓ c ✓ � N l VI 4tI .91 �I bl a 0 o c F� q U - O N C O C N+. _ n c O p � � N... G 7 N E < v ✓.-N ✓ L C O .w C _ - J C oqy . C _ P � ayct t d L _ L G V C N c c c M q < c T � C - S > ACC V G CC V_'J C .VJ b jq _T Cy =V N I , M L n L 5: !� l✓ G N �! � L M? L C _ L N n j �� r N°L _]V� _- V rr ✓aV APP � � _^Jp ^] _T✓ !_ ¢L ¢L �� G__ OP �_ �_ Cam'+ _ _ GO Cn G✓ i U= N qvG Vl ✓7'^ �T Coo L _ =L .o _ V�GC _ "d. C"c' �•`O _ -_ -`_ - ' rte° �,. ✓' u i° L_ ` „o Ni nrn�. UC.r PO c¢_ GNLnN Uu -JV O OC._ O - ^F LO ✓_y= UO - S.r ✓ C V7� TAM G_/V NT _O G =L' -� =N VlO ` - r 6 C 2 r• O C 5 c ✓- °`o ucc ccc L S 4 ac _ _� •`t _ _ - - Nom -r F �V� CG_ V'J O _ S CO - O� L G ` L = �r Gj y G �� O a n ✓V y r'l O✓ u - �•L _L t _P6c U Q ° V n C> - S n✓ M �= G' V O 0 w C C C r`j C NLY °- HOC LN' -]N rL V p Suq S - �LG4 V Ld V ✓N d_6LL G yL ` 6r C p ^- -r ddy Vr� LLB 7 V �SV.V.�yt "'G_ VC` '_ q L rte- O C✓ ✓ '7 N L L L S O � a °o - E o�PU U _ H rN L G - NV V•� r o C __ C✓ , �- O G L 7 N d G L C - rn N L VTG�O = N _ N '• r LG. L � PTO' -- N _ L C� q C ti S o G 2 r ✓_ O° N ^ N V r ✓ - L S Q U O 9 ✓ p` C L^ °'GC L_"`N Vtz VrJ £ _ ✓ --Z r =P E dCV.O �iV N ^c U✓ TrT rn O _ CC�_ C ✓ r �' � C C_ 4 � ✓ C L _ V C �+ r O �✓ cc .. c - EV c _ 5:S . L G N) ^�� Q' I � � T•� I I II I I V. M n0 OC_C LE =` ai G ti G i i O C LOr L yr ya• ON °.•'c Lr �y, =� =gym � nY 1- io of oL LO` -o �`�o LC�rU .N' _ �.n jUrj .Oi•V O- �j`'�O yn l °�P V O N U O n r T G .•r.I 6• ✓ _ C C? O O N .r P O C CJ au U_ 6VS O =- -Ci -'- -ln LCL NL POV L<c 4D p JpL �✓. S -2�G N pYL Wv�j WVV 7p I.JCpF6- <P� GlOi r•� cv O N cl !•j "J y I Q •I r � O G ... fw O N 7. - 'J•�.'J S - G C C •a C .� N N Yom- y P i O dr >..r 9OV � r I LTV p L CL J� Q` E G W p G � •cc °. G O 9 p O °N cP Lc" E o — t _LOS od O O ^ � i - LPL n•C„iri DE � �^ � � i c� ° II •' o q `OV U i _ � i J C �. .� •' G G� C >n V� ._`C ..rV •OU 6L C_luC' n� vL� -C =� C n P.L.• �= y U C` T O G G. - Q 6f V C r p e ,°G. �: L, uss �:v2 au.u.•v •°e �c cr c i ! I 3i�.np — � rcmn I N \ •\N `Q N .O I , i G: Ni i c s - "n V � 1 V _ I i I I T �. - ✓ C P C 6i � ✓ I. C - u c • � � F T' C C C' 4J I I C ^^ n G ✓ Y ._ c d . Pd` y I V L C d � L' G n� ✓ U L r N✓ C 7 O L L I w^ i I U U U n � G Et � � ✓) L C G I V `✓ PY I -V^ E >� C uT n • I =•� C< �6 I 1 V aNL ✓o _N_ �� � `�G `` G L� I d — V T G V G RJ NV d =V aI]0 I V- UN >00 • c i 1 1 - 6 ✓ I G G ^ I. O V '= F- � q d' _.. 2 O �� � I ..s V �` O � Q W i � 1 q = V Y� ( 0721 Co ±EI <4 i ¢�nG�v � `• <bi cl «n nLC .°.z .°. .ee ¢� v -i i I I j ,u. v _ i _ � i a+ a o P ° ✓I �� ` I C P l_ Cl w ^✓ L y✓ � U - C C P OAS ate` C .O- Z&35 r y s N V L I- CC U I v N S` O - ✓ E T 1 L - - J V 9 � C G'e, C;� P..o' d •"• _. -a C �. °O �_ i �t•. ! T i.-. c TIC - Pte. =, {�•�)• i N MVC � C FC VUV�L= N O I� t , ✓C V u O 6 9 T U� 7 � e. > O �� �- �� 1 I� ✓ O U -_CE L O'l Off✓ n L I _ O�q C� T C S _ ✓ Gam- ✓ _ _ ° r c. = ✓_ _ - _✓ _ `gip f <.T c`i� '- �•'. -c_ ._ -_ - -- - _ � _ _.� r. O c G c: • C, k: � CSI !1 I II wl - "n ° U - - � ✓,_� _- d✓ � a ;<. � � fist Gi � ,.G ✓q � L -� L C CCU L _.nV Q a - I ✓ r n C N w e _ ^ I , F. C a �1 '` ` V-i P '- a "'p✓ -- cc vo c � y .L.0 E P•� qo TW q 1 ..'_ _ 1 oa — utT a_ qc Iv >° T.°. ml°. — ✓__� ✓_° yl = � II cep `y _ � i � ✓_« �— � o` =V= ..,- V G_ O V 9 p J C� ✓ b_ q IV �y`' �V _ Ct rC r..r✓ <GN Cw �S O IN �1- �� `'�`\'+ LL Ow V1 • ry r m o GI = o O _ i n ✓ O- i �l j✓ OVL i N IW rP0 `q yVE P �,°pIOLZ d `w cOi oO�Nd C rao u' °S� r _ y a .w Va GOG� ^ I 0✓E 9 u. N Fi -CC GIN 2 V ^ qr Oy % IG Ct_ q ✓N� t Cd LJq TV r I^ l GN.-.. rC V, G --i y Jam. 6j .� O ✓ r� •wC... G� N O r yFn iC� �C.n ✓O `i •w0 Lp� -± V O J oNV q L Iz __c✓ �c o.� ccc � ✓uN ^` °c— r q <' cu —�� ° y.°e ✓ �� _ n� � 4 n V< i F 2` y_ C . r O q� G C N - I O � =V�V� _ n T _ � •• - n Psa NV � P 4 O N " b � V n V ✓ C � ✓ L O � I j J C V n v � � G i � M ✓ S n N C r c` L ✓ V_ o r !V •IqC C� _V Y_�_� n -CC i - c <. `.'i6VG U CC __ Ny < IE o. u .n uuco —w n — L�� -- N — _ ❑S cq zo 71 6✓ .n0�0 . NV 6 <V p� Wr.ni �• l • l V Z G � n m P J V CJ O a C E ¢ o c - o I c n o : [: q � � L c ..• c ` � I _ O� �J •�.. � V C V•S � V G .� .n L _ _ ` I — �r•I I _ C v. \]y c 6 CITY OF RANCHO CIIM CAONGA Cv'C.4.ti\1 STAFF REPORT �•���=� DATE: January 25, 1984 1977 - T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -40 - BAP,MAKIAN - The development of 13 industrial buildings total23,540 sq. ft. on 8 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5) located on the northwest corner of 6th Street and Center Avenue - APN 209 - 261 -07. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and elevations B. Purpose: Development of industrial park complex C. Location: Northwest corner of 6th Street and Center Avenue D. Parcel Size: 8 acres E. Existino Zo�`..,g: General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) F. Existino Land Use: Vacant G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - vacant; General Industrial /Rail Served South - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 6) East - Vacant; General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) West - Deer Creek Channel; General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 5) General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial /Rail Served North - General Industrial /Rail Served South - Industrial Park East - General Industrial /:tail Served West - General Industrial /Rail Served r a . iote C6ara.�cr4s&jcs: The S-s 2 $lnu-�.e$ gradually to the south Sw 1V. iu at approximately percent grade and is vacant except for cultivated grape vines. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 83- 40 /BARMAKIAN January 25, 1984 Page 2 J. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan permits custom, light, and medium manufacturing uses within. Subarea 5. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project has teen designed in accordance ::ith the Industrial Area Specific Plan requirements. The conceptual grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the Grading Committee. A single point of access will be provided on 6th Street, approximately 420 feet from Center Avenue. This access will form an interior loop driveway that wi11 connect with Center Avenue. B. Desicn Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval, of the site plan and elevations subject to providing extensive landscaping and mounding along 6th Street and Center Avenue. In particular, the Committee recommends dense landscaping between buildings to screen loading and parking areas. C. Environmental Review: Based upon the Initial Study, staff has found that no significant adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. IIl. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and building design together with the recommended conditions are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all material and input on this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. R ,L!;e �tfulA submitted, ck Gomez ty Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit_ Exhibit Initial Resoiut "A" - Location Map 113" - Jite Photos "C" - Site Plan "D" - Elevations Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions 6- 2 11 u n 11 CiTy Or' RANCHO CL;CAMONGA PLANNING ©IVOON ITE- %I: TITLE: EXHIBIT: A SCALE: L�SUT TC V _ \J NORTH ,r-- �2 �1L�'lFJG E E «n =., .10 1 R 11 .ti gr II I!�I�il�l!II� li �I t if� 1 — ...a+� � �o. r. i I ...w� a �..T. -• 'a I = 2 .I W � W � �I n>wa fG rt. �I ♦. a�o� •A. R. W I r I, "-:_� •.w as rt. - �.In w rt. � u \ I SIXTH STREET p�NSE CfTN�CSFPfAfC 01!,- Ef Dlf:L\r DLYL'J+`� PICA I�j,5j9 L' a FT A.SI:IN4 R'GWRtl` i; }'t•11 FT :A�ACh FTSI(M �1ONRJ' 207 � ,T {f�VJXJJL NCEA ]]001 SP FT. d IICP C /• V ✓NORTH CITY OF ITEM: p 2;0�5- 4.0 RANCHO CUCA 'i0.`NGA TITLE *S9'fS.__ PLANNING DIN ISI0N EXHIBIT: (= sc, F. 6% -S \-'�: - �''C✓:. --.-- I Al 1 I.A►! �Q ?.� 11 =,-,( - lc> it CITE' Or ITEM: _ �3 -.p _y R CHO CUC -k1IO \G.3 TITLE= PL X\ \1. \G DlX'IjjQ\ EXHIBIT= _-t;-> SCXLE m- 55-�� '.FORTH 6 -(v CITY 0--F R_ CHO CUCA�MWMNGGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: SE7.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, tnis fora. must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department wliere the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Fnviro=ental Analysis staff will prepare Part T -I of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee gill meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of i three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration Will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further info ^a - tion concerning the proposed project. is PROJECT TITLE: DeBerard lydustrial APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: The Barmakizn Gomoanv 9575 Archibaid Avenue Suite 101, Rancho Cucamon;a, CA 91 730 96i-z,0641 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPIONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Scott J. Bac'Ker, sane address and phone as above LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AID ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Northwest corner of Sixth Street and Center Street. AP. 209- 261 -26 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND T..E AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None 11 I -1 6 -i A PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: consisting of i4 Tree star i A 1 -4,487 square foot industri-1 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: c- F1rUDUsCU btl iiiain,�5 � a:C 1JA,-•..• r SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND Proiect site is S acres and eet or � ;or area DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE IN:LUDING INFOR"LATZON ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLATS (TREES ) , ANIMALS, AMY CULTURAL, HISTORIC_zI. OR SCENIC ASPECTS, U`E OF SURROUNDING PROPE ?TIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF AN EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (F.TTACd NECESSARY SHEETS): The subject site is level and vacant with the exc T- o , , i- tLstea with ats and Is the project Part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, n:ay as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO 1-2 E 6 -$ IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CE2TIFICITION: I hereby certifv that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my krowledce and belief. I further understand that additional info�..tatien may be required tc be szinmitted re an adequate evaluation can be made b�" e- 7evelonmert Rfv Conmittee. Date 11 -18 -83 Si 9 Title 1-3 6 -4 WILL THIS PROJECT: Y-S NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground _ contcurs? X 2. Create a substantial chance in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial chanc,-! in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zcning or general plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? HOW many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic s=ubstances, fla=ables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CE2TIFICITION: I hereby certifv that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my krowledce and belief. I further understand that additional info�..tatien may be required tc be szinmitted re an adequate evaluation can be made b�" e- 7evelonmert Rfv Conmittee. Date 11 -18 -83 Si 9 Title 1-3 6 -4 RESOLUTION 7d0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -40 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND CENTER AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIALJRAIL SERVED DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December 1983, a complete application was filed by the 8armakian Company for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of January, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Rlanning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicabie provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 25, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83 -40 is approved subject to the following conc=tions and attached Standard Conditions: 1. Dense landscaping is required between buildings to screen loading and parking areas. 2. Plant creeping ivy along building faces. 3. Trees, minimum building face at elevation. 15- gallon size, shall be planted along the a rate of one (1) tree per 30 linear feet of L11 11 CJ 6 -10 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NGES: CQMMISSIOPIERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 11 H a u 0 a Cl K O _ 0 O G O N �I 2 U 7 m 6 7 6 N < O an I O 1 I C II`� --ryvJ O I o � u I ` q y O � 4 w O J V• V I P� d_ C V 9 N CO �• u ° '1 f ✓ r a C o w l co O•_ 7 P -✓ L d wow ^ d •` v •1 .� w u an a C q o ✓Nb c— gccc qro Dec �� 9 � y d G^ > N O •°`uc L L C v d q_ y D On 'o C L• N V Y O✓ r d L C^ N t- d _a O - N C^ 6 6 C -_ -• n T c e �. Nr N�! 'y r` V L _ _PJ � y _ �' M d ✓ N � M ern !J `J � °�q ZC L > d�. y�pV q r�� JN _VC Cdr _ _T _Vq C n T 7 ^ TC) pJy. P O ^ L Y F5 n O V d. •.d... 6' g 20 •Jn C M C d O ✓_ D G M = p n •a 4, � Vic ^.Yi• n_�.. -d Ew d6.°. _�° d_C o•uv ODE A� Vc °oq O c c� u�� n• a o r � L f w° d� L q _r `_ y ^ G•" °✓ yan F G .. d .".. ?OC .'� � �n _ Yor � u• a... ' r oLr _ �_ d n ��✓ ice= 9 C Li•c.d.• dqv cro c°�.,�D' w c = '^ra ^� p S u° `° E y GE �_ P V� ¢Ka O ✓ V ° C c N_ L L n 0! L^ L p• Vq � D n O � N N 0 G✓ C 0 r ° V O. C >✓ ° w � L .Lid q q q ` L 2 �". C V C •� 'e C O i0 ... V CyN ✓` M Oia d �Pqw .-. yr NdY -G .°ar �VN L^ y A ° � V ✓ C _ � _ � N nl ^ q G J q _ w= c N L N ✓ u v w r = C u• M N' V 6 c� r b q� V r N L_ _C 'r n6Y wT nq �r A C =0 r O qurO � 9✓n `E n2C' PC °9N =� •^r0 OCY. y _y0 r= C N `CPC �� ✓N LrJ_N Nd G'q L�0 a nYC NS E CC Py > Nit ✓ 6 _ rl 's Or �' q J NC ¢� w i V r V d '� ✓ T O a .j �p J <V waF � d 'CqC> 6tu Q r OTNG 7�� N >E p•C �•°rt °.00OM VC Trd VC O�w6 CD CN L 060a �r JdO FC'/ C y V•°n Nd r V C C L u N.°� .w v E L O ^ C T U V G L y 9 6 N 6 L 9 _>✓✓ Q 4 6 4 •` O 6 G h" G N ^ ^• n r L N O < N r O V Q O n m 6 V .p 6 S 6 L 6 C J 6 U N p 11 H a u 0 a Cl K O _ 0 O G O N �I 2 U 7 m 6 7 6 N < O an I O 1 I C II`� --ryvJ O I o � u I ` q y O � 4 w O J V• V I P� d_ C V 9 N CO r u ° y C r J a C q _ 9 � y d G^ > N O •o L L C v d q_ y On Nr L 9 F5 •a 4, � Vic ^.Yi• n_�.. -d Ew d6.°. _�° d_C o•uv ODE A� Vc °oq ✓ t F G .. g om✓ q_ q C O r n b C 9 C GE Qj ¢Ka '� L p• rl p. > C 2 �". C V C •� 'e C O i0 ... V O O N C O c N f dC Oy cr =L 00� Nt _C C N N 2 O E > <V ' < O P q v °PC 'dS -a• rnr L L � Try L�ri -c cc -v �c c.-. ^�u .°• -a No o -°•iL �.. ✓ o u cc q M qo•n jOO q ='� (J C OVV q ^2..[CT Lfj G ✓` - i E � Wit` - -� -'�_ ` Wj ru^ C✓ pJ'C 1u d'OE rLtE =� °•, -�. °SCOW ni {. N _ � Or G _� °nr c` E.°i m J r i "➢ c E E✓.. 2 `. C= ^_ - _- v V � •� nq L >, V.T. N °va r, V _P _� Oy �CCE mct °o cow � >,o v�� -° e•°„ _ as � ' pv.. c �. -'L c>,`L cNr. GgLCd.. c._ c oJ✓ ..r qT cm_•°o_N�c° GJ L n� �r C r G ' C O E G V?, j j V G .`.. O L J E M '^ r A C {� U •+ � C N U O J c c Cd L O - c C � V -✓�✓ L- C i d T- � -- n q L q .i. .- f V `J =0` O .- � O ` =NJI�� ✓C N9 C r c° -�jdy� FE S �.` r ..�rLy V`. E.� -Nri qC'J ^C ✓�✓ 4i g q L O" -V- O U V U V 7 L n J P O✓ O N S _ L f V✓ ~`C n ` fir` Q L _ C` �.. �r cxoL �� CW �r�dLr 'o N aC OTq N.Ln .•? E .Le COO 'N�o cy a •-t.. o.c NJrU irT 'o, qq qc° ^vL„ cnza a:5 ..0 Pp C -•Od 'GNU Nq ._+> _ °i CVL q�Er C�'Cga Tq O ✓q ➢ ➢L £ -_ u.= q O °� C C V nG�Ca O� ..0 F'- a•r VN q= 2 t OL NL O LC `Ld Qld > �C °CO >��� -. �V`n �' f.J✓ NI ✓ m �N� c✓ qj�0 „L.`...� yJ =i nm£E O`...�^ LO N Cr Cnt_ LO II r➢ 12•- - u. T�� _ 6 CN G_ �C .J -+° �< �° =c.` ucr rc W <l �a > .°oo$�N sT+�c �° JC ^gnyC Vy PCW d G a� O d OL •� d� C u Ur ✓ ✓ U V nI .v L__ P➢ Ce C .� P ��< N ... r r V� C C r✓ C C�` C�ZV� _`C.i PAC 'Y Crndc r�CL °�`J Sri JI LC_ �_ O N L N C O> N y V C N d L N 1-� C C n L 6 F u 6 r O O L O.O L G 6 0^ T N g N t u r G M C d� q CQ ��OWCI rdCVN � V � dr�rN _ q - °o dv L`o Lv C~ a q� c�✓ � - +' c q ° - p F >� L g O d 6 ° N C OL ^ �• u P V° .. V° V C '� °. 4 •.a N= g C G n C .- V n y> l __ V. N N 6 q ✓ P J .' V C E � r. N > 9° u. � C N L N° r T. nF d9 Cf1J]]ON V NQOq .N.� V qNC �O �P�wd L 4vC .Li.J .N 6�C PC C U 6 � UCV. VC_ W P O L J a O C 0 N C > V C r U O � VO O.j C 2 C q V q r -J C Y° O G f C- q V n✓ V p 9 C .aS Ci ^ -�� S =Q�N ✓�. £.r NF C'^ q- '£� -L n NN �J N N ✓ V� 9 d d j G✓ -> L G C �' 1 O ^ r C C P qLU aO�V C- VCr JG C Jrl .0 C+Civ L.--EC W ¢ d 2 c C r. C O y W C y g N 0^ C O C✓ L,,. C >.d. 'c °vo °�= n c L d r N .'. i- T�xoo �u - c -. .c cz s • once c L 2.2 •J _ V c 7 E 9 C d Q C- V C O V V C F N n T ^° - 9 r q .. C _ V U U C 6 C V 4' Cr •• G ° G � V r O C d L O- C O C .r L O fJ V N � 6' ? ✓�� 754 .2 ✓ C J� n E C C✓ d C O d O O a N° ^ C r C V jJ_ V O L Q a- C` C•> Cq- V P C6 °��� C C . V^ � � C, CV C C� O� q'r- r C d •n N L T � T �- L S YVUC. - rn L.P� -V TV pd TCUgV ci U ✓Lr� � Vt CquLO V T CC rC ^CL 4�`.Vi.J Nqq �y r.�..i ( V L Cd C- N C q 46r6U N� N 6.r ,C� C� N I1 l� f Ll N 0 M G '^' Lao c c ^°ncc oc s'NL n G L C O C � O •O V N ✓ q V .^ G 73- V C_ O q 9 d ^J G T r L LOG C 0 C G y n n ? y y V s pv i °� ?c C p C O T V L C o C u N 7 O y ✓ V V N O J d � G"._O ✓^JU T � f�C L n q q!» NL -r L d S �_ V L �' J r L V ✓ p er G` -` O N N� ,n° IO V gvVnC y_L LCd- �N�C �q V Py N G l a O J S y C a ' d? S = E V d L O G_ N N Q ✓ O C r d f j C 9 I ✓= n G q ✓ L a L r N C pr l P C p q N N C N LNL Odppn ✓� C nv CP O L Sr dndOf LLLG 'i ✓ ur q 3' � CC r C ^� P- n V ��J- ✓N q y ✓� n G =N ji vL C +°i c 9 C L ,cec j G u nozL vE�a b>,L _' cdregc = ° �o =i ,c. >•dV qiG civ- �O y d c_- .O 'V^� cc -acV° G -° Eoc JVT �O C pPP TC OrJ -'�•+P '9 bOCt r� Pn�'u L C � C V• q r � T p V- P E O ` - V= CW u.W.•7`�� �O`L �°. W_n pN OCR �o 4n�Op 6 � NL F'V n Gny OV N JLE O .:__ Q q T 7 6 �_ _r O V L G q d � V V✓ M '.O NL � � 9V dr P p _ P� VOV y GC r r V _ °dl P b_ _ _ V C �+ _� T✓ O N n L O L q L ✓ O C r 0 .n L ✓ 1[ C C° N� r L N E✓ O �. P V� c N G y �n�PC.c V O✓ C L � i -✓LN q ✓ 9� ryE __ P �"' _ O O L N Y j t l P y L..•� r � C L � N.> r C V O � C C° '." d M q'J c, 2 n cc EEn O� _ T. 6 OnL O ✓qU -= O W J C � v w n C n P q O ✓ _ O LLC a ` r E L L V L C Q I ✓4 L G q4 C C�rL aq�f A`V� •^C� �LN r - -C•J G L �`O CnnnN t.G` 6 Pay d ,r V`Vaj Vc?u C� - V V 0 0 � �• q i >, _• i n -' � E' .a TTT N L �' x d N ^v C O G p b q O �/ O ^ O ✓ U d T _ � N n V L N ✓ t L C .^ ✓ C V •r � - -_ .n V T. G O C V V P N N V � d � d� V N �- ��� I T L n •• 6. i� C= O d� N G� y O i= _Sn O ^� NC✓ ✓ LZ njVr -�� v. O Tdnr V N � NCB•` VG O • _N G O O _ C ,^ � N r� r V V p v d C C O d ` V ✓ l N N c. r d` °' arnw ✓L l L .^q dare v mc'r - EN N Eaa oPN��u' Ti = u l' i Lm m T -` .. ✓ _. .G. G N w Y.G. s w v .-n G = ✓` m m E Y a' v =� d °✓ s cv ow °+`, u.°, p L ua+.= o E - w .L- r✓ as.. u iN�✓n a a., spa r 1 W M O U O - G P� . ¢• O L d r - or.. l P cc �J G• ca �_ oc P d rn G T L^ - a G �• c a o_ t V• ^✓ Cl t UP � — — r �` �` b G V Q q p p•` C V �` E O c•d a - qa q C J — T V �.� Q o ✓.��. Z C L` O✓ -•J VVPUa� Nd� X.E .- O N CN 6✓ ✓ O C C L G c S T r� c` d N^ G — E •- j ^? N G u_ M�C� s��L uUi �O v C6 q' CV � GO�V CO�y NCr'.r VN �Vr CG d O.V -- LCD O O O -1 C P ryL ' �, c c c ° f'L_N °- co t J _ c o.r - o.✓., ACV POV Tu_dL —�J (xaq J� OG— — •J -J _q q —n✓ d C r i� C•raC �¢ ^G ^O Cn - r ✓ q O 6 q O - O O C - a a °�� .°. o c+ ate.- op,�y O✓„ CMrc.� N C P L O✓ M 9 N V d' ° d O 73 U I n El uN VP4 J C C'� d'� ✓_- N= - as r n v,°o d L o c � •a" •co �r r. aL+c �+ rowL o or c q " L I wo v .2; NGO -d C_.= N ¢.y C —L ^✓ q✓ =q —CO NNL� VI r _" -2 o- ^I cc au - •� OcNL-• VO = at�L `t c Lc o'o Pt L � ••' 4 d Nf 4 r 000. I I Q 3 A 4 0 G C •+ s Y d G — T O J .G.. C V' +I d O V Cn G a or a _ _ L • • • • OI Gi � Nl urn —o t uN aN.�c ° ✓ 4 . w u II � N L T✓ rVi `� t � ��, "�OV 1¢ u T moo;'✓ o N 1 tJ � i � .. N — a .. a ✓ J I ,I � i j E d C t d V V� S .+ V .yy u t L✓ � � I I I ^ I I C�n�M -NG CO ^V `u ¢C.� �� P 1 - 1 -I I • C A I� � �= S- � 1 d Q V u� �° ✓ 4' ` O - - I �✓ I -\ Y I 1 I j NN �V ¢G O^ N4C N. �I 'd'LY� FS ✓✓I �tW I ' � c I ^ 6A C 1 _P- i p -= V � v 0 0 � A � � N � p j r' r � O p a l 6 ✓_ I� %\ I 1 I _P L O G q �- ^ J 6 N V U^ � d lV. u P'� V- C✓ O 67Z V- d n N o L - �I I I I a r°i ^• t¢ V V u A f P M' V- L¢ I � q ONE � iI{ ~ V�V 4 P uc�C Lam- V)✓w V^ fT v II ' r• N A c c~ p L L✓ E o c _ 1 w E � Jcn .°.ny Cam✓ V .Li.A �—�.. L S d d G�y' Md VVL d> d LNU.r ^° y dd u— P G p_ c c c v cci .u" _ do ✓.� 6.°�ia = ac...._c Gq c, �..� 'o^a s •coo_` -.=,m niv` -- c, y C d✓ O N q � C O r L p^ `^ n� � __ C y ✓ .� l Oly a. VV VG` �f O ��� A N r O N O V` > .� .n „ L V I E T,Vn ✓ ..r ✓ A V O �V� G� -606 C L A _G � m 0✓ J-^ ✓ J °V. N .n .� +� V N C M I N �' I � ° q C I ° -c• '• =°.r o . ,a °m ^-eC ... N °dc a¢4c — NrN > .e ._ — NGr— u_I °4 o— A Q S C U 9 d TI CI 00 Oar � i ^L'• V9 C]I O �I ✓1 N `fv' w' J r t 1 U u .r, 0 L u 0 Ll O d T W C •'� C` CV • T O — �' 7 I O O 6."n O ^J W V p a Y c � ° °� o G L p� C T C •`` d O I � —�! i q N la oL v t On VC �.Jq •• V I ` Q i 9q� ...0 11I N O _ -- 37 Gu 6.. dl I .11 p N 0 I VGi G .n `C = =Ud is N`9 y Ll OOaa� L O 1= J ` o v D = yT•— O C V y d L L p O Z N WJC N N L G N C O W i 6 S L I U Pa r. C y u' J_ L a 6 N 9 ��• q i C N O O V C y y J LL. 9 o T « °N �a -a o «�. ••� qc a My d I r' JEq tu— CV VC ..s C JOEL •J Q CV q JE>CV IL C Q.°.r C C U Gi _ O � .O+ .O � � j� V G V� n l W n 7:2 0 aL. F++ iN Gc np— no u I� �(V 6'� WanNILV 36 VO �[y 6 V NCW 9� �J OJO N.nV 6�J u 0 Ll 0 T, .1 �I dMiLlf c ci 0 0 L C E j cr II n `at r I C`n I °d° � u � L � r O' 7 �J v� - -_ � - a r O w u N N d i r _ r u u -Z t _ OT .� aC NCL ,n 0Y �n n u O O C M i CI pL -� p0 n '� '✓ �� ar yr ¢y n j cr II n `at r I C`n I °d° � u � L � r O' 7 �J v�