No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/06/27 - Agenda Packet ._ : , r. .:O'^ D � i. 1;�'� r !t��; �� I j7. t r <152. f !\�i ?,4 �:.� "�, . r, f ,� `_ ,. , _ ��, .� eF . a .;4' h, �i �i •H f ',fI { Y t t �•, � ... _. � ' _ �,��. .. ' ♦:"<'� . ` -. Y "�.'� •' [[[ _'. .. .. ._.,1,.. .. �i. . f.. c% ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCINIONGA i ' AGENT D.'k L7: WEDNESDAY June 27, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARS CON UNITY CENTER. SISI BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.LIFORMA ACTION L Piedge of Anegiance IL City Clerk Beverly Authelet wDl administer the oath of office to Commissioners Chitiea, McNiel, and Stout. 111. Ron can Commissioner Barker x Commissioner Rempel x_ Commissioner C hitieax Commissioner Stout _X Commissioner IficNiel x IV. Amouncements Y. Consent Calenda.- The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine aril non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. APPROVED 5-0 A. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMTr 81-18 - ASKA - The development of a building contractor's of '_ce and yard with two buildings totaling 12,795 square feet on 3.5 acres of land in the General Industrial/Rail Served category located at 9460 Lucas Ranch Road -APN 210-013-02. B. TI.13E EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7441 - TAC KETT - Locsted on the south side of La Grande, west of Amethyst Avenue - APN 202-081-13, 14. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7326 - KOBACKER COMPANY - Located on the southeast corner of Baker Avenue and Feron Boulevard. i VL Public Hearings ]he following items are public hearings =n which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recocnized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating you.:, name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 mianstes per individual for each project. APPROVED 5-0 D. EN'VIROKMENT9L ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8477 - STEPHEN N - A division of .49 acres into 2 parcels in the Low Residential District (2-4 du/ac) located on the north side of Lomi z Drive between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues - APN 201'..-081-35. APPROVED 3-2 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8506 - R.J. DiVF.ST:l+IENTS - A division of 9.028 acres into one parcel in the Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac) located on the west side of Baker Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard - APN 2C7-581-57 and 207-571-59. DENIED 5-0 F. ENVUtONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVP3W 84-08 - R.J. INVESTMENT - The development of a 26 .mit apartment complex on 9.03 acres nf ?and in the Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac) located cm the west side of Faker, south of Foothill - APN 207-581-57; 58, 20 7•-5 71-79. APPROVED 5-0 G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8583 - C,RPENTER - A division of 4.5 acres of land into 2 parcels in the General Industrial category (Subarea 3) located at the n 3rtheast corner of Hellman Avenue and 9th Street - APN 209-033-12. APPROVED 5-0 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12365 - WESTEfLN PROPERTIES - The development of 270 apartment units on 8 lots comprising 15 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway - APN 1077-091-01, 02. VIL hi.,w Basins$ APPROVED 5-0 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-21 -AJA -The development of three one and two story mdustrW park/office suites on 4.09 acres in the Industrial. Park category (Subarea 6), located on the west side of Haven between 6th and 7th Streets - APN 209-262-179 18, 19 and 20. w�Y..: VML Dkector s Reports J. Commission selected J. I9TH STREET :ORRIDOR STUDY - LAND USE sites for further AMENDMENTS study. K. staff directed to K. DESIGN REVIEW SUBCOM!VIPI"I'EE - Oral report by Rick reci eve commentsGomez, City Planner from the BIA. L. ETIWANDA AREA DRAINAGE POLICIES L. Commission PublicCommeats selected options IDL with direction to This is the time and place for the general public to address the staff to prcceed Commission Items to be discussed here are these which do not to City Council . already appear on this agenda. Adjourned - 11 :55 p.m. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that sc--r an 11 p.rr. adjournment.time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. s- '`y V"ItCOINITY MAP ri iIh.Y1. i,a•..e,r.i.�a..�..•c, COLLEO[ • e , B.Y Iw. IS� 4 Y +, � � • , ♦ l Iua.� .Iww urr'•uL • • - I _ • • %/ i N • 1 CJC6uC4GI-GUKTI GCUY•• vGWO.0 .uR aMJIF10 'N714-4-10v.L AUMO•J C77Y OF RANCHO A,�,, CniY OF ' RANCHO CLCGj%jO\GA ��" _ - o PL�h�'�T:�TIi\TG CG"vI�IISSI©:�T z AGEN 1977 WEDNESDAY June 27, 1984 7:00 p.m. IJONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALZFORNIA L _Pledge of Allegiance IL City Clerk Beverly Authelet will administer the meth of office to Commissioners Chitiea, McNiel, and Stout. IIL Roll Can Commissoner Barker _ Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Stout Commissioner rAcNiel IV. Announcements V. Commat Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controt.,ersiaL They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-18 - JASKA The development of a building contractor's office and yard with two buildings totaling 121795 square feet on &S acres of land.in the General IndustriaLiR.all Served category located at 9460 Lucas Ranch Road -AF N 210-013-02. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7441 - TACKETT - Located on the south side of La Grande, west of Amethyst Avenue -APN 202-081-13, 14. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7326 - KOBACKER COMPANY - Located or, the southeast corner of Baker Avenue and Feron Boalevard. �r L VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating you name and address. AL such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8477 - STEPHENSON - A division of .49 acres into 2 parcels in the Low Residential District (2-4 du/ac) located on the north side of Lomita Drive between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues - APN 202-081-35. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8506 - R . INVESTMENTS - A division of 9.028 acres into one parcel in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dulac) located on the west side of Baker Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-581-57 and 207-571-59, F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS:IIENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-08 - R.J. INVESTMENT - The development of a 126 unit apartment coniplex on 9.03 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac) located on the west side of Baker, south of Foothill - APN 207-581-57, 58, 207-571-79. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8583 - CARPENTER - A division of 4.5 acres of land into 2 parcels in the General Industrial. category (Subarea 3) located at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 9th Street - APN 209-033-12. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12365 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - The development of 270 apartment units on 8 lots comprising 15 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway - APN 1077-091-01, 02. VIL New Business Y. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-21 - AJA -The development of three one and two story industrial park/office suites on 4.09 acres in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6), located on tine west side of Haven between 6th and 7th Streets - APN 209-262-17, 18, 19 amd 20. 7�. L VE . Di er_tor°s Reparts J. 19TH STREET CORRIDOR STUDY - LAND LSE AMENDMENTS K. DESIGN REVIEW SUBCOINIMMEE - Oral report by Rick Gomez, City Planner L. ETIWANDA AREA DRAINAGE POLICIES EL Public Comments This is the time and place for ti:c general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. S. Adjournment .The Planning Commission has adopted Admi?istrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If iterr-.s go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commissiom 4,.ti; VICUTY MAP ----, : :� '.-.ter , . •-•—..._._J---- � ri , i c g 1 ,rota. a Nadi. CIMIKY RDq•,LI•Iq) r r i wrINN, • t � r• l ^-�ht CNICEEt , COLLEGE � �• .r a N IL IDN I�` Cl?t M.CI • • f Mon '74 tires a Pf n 1`e[ aie a • • reow • i • o CUCAMOUG.-DUISII COUN1t .10r0..1 IeJ. / �. ., DnuarO I.1E aal;rOnr1L uaao•r r. . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlu1C)N(`„q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c 3CAMO,� STAFF REPORT c' Io Fj Iz DATE: June 27, 1984 1977 i TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL ++cE PERMIT 01_10 _ ,ACVA � The development of a building contractor's office and yard with two buildings totaling 12,795 square feet on 3.5 acres of land, in the General Industrial/Rail Served category ;Subarea 5) located at 9460 Lucas Rancho Road - APN 210-013-02. I. BACKGROUND: wne applicant is requesting a time extension for Conditicna Use Permit 81-10., described above and shown on the attached exhibits. Tne pro ect was originally approved on ,'.anuary 13, 1982 for 18 months and subsequently was granted a 12••month extension. Due to the current economic conditions, the appli,:znt is requesting a one (1) year time extension consistent with the provisions of the Development 'Code. II. ANALYSIS: A review of the development plans indicates that the project is consistent with current development standards. In addition, the building elevations appear to meet current design standards. Regarding the length of the time extension, the current Development Code allows for a 4-year approval, with the appropriate extensions. Since eighteen months are left of the four year maximum for this project, it is suggested that a final extension be granted for the full eighteen (18) months. A copy of the original Resolution of Approval with conditions and the Planning Commission minutes of January 13, 1982 are attached for your review. III. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that a final extension of eig teen $ —months be granted for this project. The new expiration date would be January 13, 1986. Re *ectf y bmitted, it ck mez it P r RG:NF:jr 'r ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Conditional Use Permit 81-18/Jaska June 27, 1984 Page 2 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Letter from Applicant Requesting Time Extension Original Resolution of Approval with Conditions Planning Commission Minutes - January 13, 1982 Time Extension Resolution of Approval y. n h i. i' S 4 1}( r { { a,. � r i t AT SF M Sth AlIcs u+ LLI aloe Y. �A nth r 4thbr• 00000 • 00 • • • • • • +, Z,' • � Y • 1 CITY • PLANNING • ��N Ilk ,� _I � �_ �°_« •. ca _� Ira--.�. a• � t _� J [LCF 4•W?'•�4 �_ 1 - w 1 _K1K1 • Sr.L' �c M I: V f4: ;. NORTH CITY OF T f^i \V 1�v iTL\i Tin c�-- RCl lO CIiC-, ljNjV � TITLE: iaT= A!` PLAt1i�i\G DI�'LSIOV E\Ii1BCT- _SCALE: E!.a- 109 ) , A x acr.... ono._-�.._._.. ` ..+ nwLcM.s ��✓�'� .yea'rw�v.w/ .n4y' IW�h•M • T'w0 ht4rN• `•mec 4:.�i.{e II �i� iall � I li I- . I � �;:i I II� I�I �11•� II li � �. ie� I I �i��t . __ ._ ._. / �1� rl� o r•I ,I: ; ,,� t t. - .I . I I I P +i + III I 11 71 r' . s' i•- � bt; . '; .... _ r. ... .—•.ram.—. PoC'nai. .n.. 'wrnr_ • • _:.fir { . '�'.. _�•� :�.1 ! M : ,® CITY OF 1TE t:-fiomi� RANCHO CLCAVIO\G.A TITLE- PLANNING DIR'LSIOV E\IItrIT• �, td« -------------------- �O'LO �•J e' a •R F• - 1 • I � tl I �a I iJ I I :• ' � I L. I- � It � •-�... �r lr.l . , y l L I I;: _� '•� i•I � � 1. 1' � V. I of -ASM1:... )_-. _-Fi,,l� n '1 I {i'-i:• �r � •)t.�.; • �i I CITY OF � RAI CHO CL'C-�1i0\G� 'TTrT }: T PLANNING DINT ON EEXI-iIrTr: a' r+w �VM1 1 1�1 ic-� cicv�r� a.q.ry w�e� Llreal li �f ® CITY OF RE\I: �P- = \CHo Cuc- N IO\GA TITLE PI N -G DIX'LSIQ�' 1"Sr" G SCXLE: I r r r,l martin x F r jasirca , i c . GENERAL CONTRACTORS May 25 , 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 "& Basel'in, Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention : Nancy Fong Re: Larid Construction Co. Office & Warehouse Buildings Dear Nancy: For reasons beyond our control , we are forced to request an extension for our project above named and filed under f:C.U.P. 81-18 Lucas Ranch Road. Enclosed please find extension fee of $62 . 00 in order to avoid expiration of our approved project. We thank you for your cooperation in this request . Very truly yours , dB :ta N JASR_9, INC. Ba' t 3 "a, ger Ulf Q CON OUN)TO CITY Y RANCHO CU q6 0NGA DEVF�OP&7E;T DFPr. Enclosure AMMAY 2 g 1934 cc : Jimii Laird 7+81911a1131yrik2 PAI Laird Construction_ Co . , Inc. �3kt�1S 4661 Arrow H-;.ghway 3 Montclair, CA 91763 4761 ARROW HIGHWAY 0 (714) 626-2446 0 MONTCLAIR, CA 9 1 763-1 296 RESOLUTION NO. 82-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAN IONGA PLAN NIt:G CO!I?IISSIDN APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-18 FOP, A CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE AND YARD LOCATED AT 9460 LUCAS RANCH ROAD IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/RAIL SERVED ZONE WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1931, a complete application was filed b; N.artin Jaska, Inc. for review of the above-described project; and WHE --AS, on the 13th day of January, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. N0:4, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows : SECTIC71 1 : That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will - comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued '3n January 13, 1982. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81-18 is approved subject to the following conditions and the attached standard conditions: PLANNIRG DIVISION 1. Undulating turf mcti: nding shall abut the 8' high decorative block wall to reduce the visual impact of its height. Details of the roundinq shall be submitted with the landscape and irrigation plans subject to Planning Division approval , prior to issuance of building permits. �' esoiut.on ::o. bz-u5 Page 2 2. Details of the view obstructing sate at the entrance to the yard shall be reviewed and annroved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building remits. 3. The landscaped area along the street frontage shall be mounded and significantly landscaped. Consideration shall be given to a drought tolerant landscape design. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING CO'v ;ISSION OF E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: ., ! / Jefr ey/ E' I ng, i1paIrman/ !! rj'sI�ATTE Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Lucz.-onaa, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reeuiarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Citv of RancnG Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co-,=4ssion held on the i3t++ day of January, 1982, by the foilowing vote- to-wit: AYES: COMU SSIONERS: Rempel , Tclstoy, Dahl , Sceranka, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: None i f - ♦ 1 d = 9 � r D c b S ✓ C r C M C n _V-O �C� _ � e 4 � - O u p J v L ✓ .�. _ V O d r _ _ U _ _ = - V O �✓ - q q i ... - -V y' 9 ^� C ✓ 4 � C _ ] y ✓ G..� � O G v _✓ 7 u� �✓ 4 � � ._w rVi V ✓ G'r G 9 \L d V C C _ _ O .. _ � O ✓ _ O n - 9 _ ` 1 C c __ C_ y n ✓ C `� D � u S � � O __ _ - v r O c_.n W. C C - O C .w = � DO .JO O j .• C .Li _ � _ VLF -' O _ D V q` C 7 �. d C_ O l .� O y�� `v 6 q ♦ F _ .V � n q O_ o .. u E o c_ vq u w_ i= _ w .� O _✓� n 9- ? 2P� C_C ✓ C -_ o > Z dC V� .oC - ` 2 2 Cc L P.O.r9cr u0 6 �r _ ` -.rn ✓ '^+ C VAT r - i .> C i V d`.� ' -- •.7' O- =; = V r ZP V!C w V _ _ V ✓ 0 0✓ `` C �I r- V o.E .d.r - Y- vuo :.✓ r' c - _ r -_... .Yip ti �- .Lr.rl V 9u VO T rn ynuV J9 TO ACV=V ~� ` va.. vO� w ` r uG ` DV V r 2 ` .^ �< CC 9C � - ✓ rC CY- 9� rL .� C' OJ Li C✓ c.� .rnd <.ce �.o.o .., c .o. .:.a :s �i .`.� �`✓ ei : a� G'� " o %� .c- u� ccn ! -N _ t>. N N b✓ `� I h h 0 /� � C L .a... C T �9 ny OO i T-✓ c✓ J r j ?� O .Lr.✓ O L V � ri > �V � q .O f�.. 9 C tS- M c o v J , �• � �O 64 Pw <V ra .DJ V JV - ? O r O E O F - ` S✓ Cq i rV r r�jV � .Oi.^ a_: � _d � 9 _•' 49V O L O- �1 q qV bn 9 ✓✓ VO ✓ J L�� O �V s✓�` O � � C ✓ L .� V9 � Y a �r a✓� .V.. O 6 w-c3 o J� i ✓r v u_d-. OL _ ocq co c �_ vc _ �o c� G9 � G+o 4 o u yO �` O V✓ �p C.". 4 G d✓ C -..0.. � 91 ~ O L - � O D O L S :a C G .r GI q0 =r p.o OJ aq� 'O 24 V r -d 4 _ _� ✓ qV 9 W iO nG ucc n 'c.v oc _u or 2z w p y ..r q r i.a O V 4 _ _ C tc !�' � vd a c �_ ,.. "' a oPm _= m�Lo.� pn �o� +a on -�wa' � _ _� c✓✓ �I � ,r Y .'A �_ 7TP n � L�� -> �`N _' C✓ O VL_ � s7 OrC �A .i V `I V } O O O V _ C .a r C✓ L= v -_ C r 9 w�� V jr wOC 0...fj 9Y cl � o� V _ p _L _C✓ _ ' C N r� � N SAG ��✓ �C � > r t� 6�a Dr. �� r. cad CO .✓i.w .Oi. `Cd a.1.yI N N J at1i J I O C O L _ v C D - ! ��; c T �.r � O r C I a O < r � •f r C l _O �- M 1Y1 � y V r O.. = � i �Y L O y y G � G U•+� r � i no u -y _ _ _-" '� n ° r ; Ll.o .u• c F� �.' n Svc - 6o`0 ` -6 j '.�~, _i. � �= C V 1 r'y C � u.O; L L• l O�G U.�.. oe - ey - moo rS " ,.2, D � • �_ �=rr - Lr._ :. o L \z n 4` .a ` G 1 _ r'r C .•r L � I •. O C 6 �_ y i C� r i j C rC ... �vY 70= _l ET V � -�• T � ` I+t r _� - �.N. 4 C V L N rn.n _ Y N y S •J - I O } = 11 O I�: � C a - M_= G <� J� O J fr P ✓• O `r L � L — ' � O✓ C ,�. � I..n p L N r j O Gi• .gip i` _V Cr � 6G, � _OL •�•� a N 4 1 U �L C- J -'_• IN •• L > rV�rC _ -. if 2 � o � uoL P i- `o' ,<-_ " c Tr o-D J _ ��r T O _ 7 O �N cL � ..� �r_y -� � � - _ -� � I --J c. ..• - i q tea. LT ^-, E E Vu _ -_ Co No - -- Cs > I `-• c � +' < _ C - � � yP_ � Vo`W C •n >- O G 1.• 7 v ' - O J 4 P N .Gi J L C.• q O - CI NO LLrV S� •nOn h �I c N O C - 7 E u T V L _ i O l T U N O �• 7 < < P Q S 2 C L L O L P C O- L V O '.J r r `r• � T C� p _ _ •� 4 L_ < �J U O_ w� C j .n d _ c L � V V C T O_ _ L ti r v N O T J •T V O T�_ Tv 9r 9N6 .J.-.r 'u OL� < •� 21 _Cv �_ r r• Z C L > n C _ 3 d qY O V i � _ C r �L Y.� L •f � 'O u r� �•n q L 9 r0 Jn• O E�J T-N+ < O `L 'V SON T� aLLV T 4 r c v O •4i[ ur ��`. aC_.r� QCyC N� <_r• 00 T V l •aVrw >•V� =6 V O w a T C r `= ~r• i G T_ 9 V V N 4 6 d~ G O r y =r u 4= Q Q Y O <V Cr d= �� _._ '.Oii NN ` F p T C• y � = - •' V N� CN Z jQ C -Q < yr� E � ` � _ �6 Cq� E Mc .wi• O-= 4C - u0 • T <.G.•4JO Pc ry- �pn w=• < � O L r J N� �VVL q'^ yV.Gi• cn 4rl FL LV LOu NV- O V_ E Ea r � '•�' c .ec cu �-ec9.rt a •' � 79a �- OiV �.�.• _ u4 or d -� T N cT G�=� <- ••-u .4.nn cr _ r„ v `3 =� .-.v c' o L '"- u cc oP,tt`. r �� o -T•.e .N..e� uc� e > > LLB uo-. u� � e oo < c4 2 o 4u�.•- >nr" o ca.oi 7 O x q rr � PLL PO P�aOr N > E .'n V!!,2 _ T L °• - •^- u •,• o o G � .•.-. der L � _ zv-, •' 4 L _ r _ _ o G _. C - � ? ? d l L L V �r• _ �< �� L � O - g q T V v O L �_ _ 6 .L _ n L T•.Oi T N L T_ C V ? O ^ U 3_ O L r O a N > r O w O r C 4 ~ N U V r r n r.CN ya __ anOc �3R .n r•� ^•J V6 -L9c 60 ' ucaa� � 4-O ` > _ - _ -> 4Lr oP ..,:• u == � E :_ 4 .:e � - c- d uN .4.� cc- `emu Lc - ovY- To sro •:Lr oN •.-L co e d_ � c � � _ e _ N N�L V T r r P O M N Y 2 4 yr`• N O O P T C`L 9 S r L V ^l 0 O Z Q q V •' S 7 r < <' L r N d O 9 4 O S w 2 G i•4] T C r L N C C T V 2 L V u O a4r C4 O � Qli Y. 4VPr� 0 NNL. N 1T Y� '�O VY - .- EE 4N \' .I G r � u .LWi P C 1' n a V 9� _ ..• J C _ pi =i• V 6 l 0 -n O�q _ E O�-r_ O tJ J T 4 a G N V r O C CSC � 9C1 _ JV - -lLG COr -� C tt� C�OGtl Z •n O I I I _ _ I JJ L O p `r _ qu = 'o-P .u.3� 1`. -, ••'^ a -�. TrmC� 'c'�'- vc� J� = _ " .". f i L � 1 =_` -.. G <r J Y T C V - C G r -i ? G q O c ^ V N G L 1 .n I _ •.r _ tl P O_ L O P G-. r Ny Ca._ t'• O .�..CV _ JY C � il �_ f' CyS_ I C U `. '1 _ `:_ _ �I -� `• _' tl C4 ^ -) V O Y O nVw yV " V VNL 'J �r ._I T' •. � S V G tl- q d C � w L n N in� C r_ G W L�j C •a r .n 4 W' .7 '� J O .n L..• 0 9 �r •n C = q b C- v y 7.i G O r 4 6.+u r-� I .n I p 7 L �' a V �r 7 C M L O r P y O w 'r N n•O..-.. C N � i 1> O �L N.0..� � uI _ � L I{ N 9 l L..G, P� Lr `9 a— c � --•. o.'. -u c_ "nm »T y0 •-1.-.. 6q C �' _ — I I .� O V 9 T l V V r - O_V O � V O V 9 i�� t^ P` G � P--�J= V � ` N I l a •^ t n_ CCP NO OLa tlV •n y '�r �CO wNOOd rOVJ- C r '_"� _ I C O .. 4dw M ✓ _r C u '... _ T V _�OOr jr L N c BOO Vtl •y .r'J' C>.r r • O �C •Jv? O C=..� � CV 9- -a � VO- Va•L � rc G 46 � -'� c y. _ _ •r 2 O G_ V C i L O O y r r_ V d-a ry _L N O.M9V Obr _ GVV a r_ _Vr i C.� y•-J' - Gb _ u•'TC` r T4 _ �V - � � ti O q •^ -f P O u p N = j O V d d C V? _N _V V E a C C S G� 4 O, p C'-J -�LCVp^cJ .G'n �C Gy7O V WGV LVV G ` `C Cr_ Va P p G a.� V' d_O - S 9 r r O.r.r L�g tl 9 d � 6 6 -'r •n L P q� o f _ � tl X J a > C PC Q C.�•i O-a p V q V C y V CJf V y 'q d V O j C `Gt yQ.•'p N T 6 C-= 9 Q c �" i s •n C.n L i r O` G. V N p a C S C N T r U S a V V •J a •w = O >, q d C V ` 6 q G? V b y- •a .V. L G r G 9 - C � Pr u u p G O TM^•J __ cl r O � Q L^ c•-�...V .�-r � � r ._ E r� .na O� i 'Ctl- O CrJNC �J � � -a7 PO V• -l� V- rV� O Y it _ C rd N� _ C C C O m'C •...G q C 0 �I �G •n ^ _ �• -J r j G N L O � G r j L LrTr: c` -r.N.. .o. � � o •O � mvc eo .. b� a' �e -=J ....n - V C S M 9 � C -f T V C m {J W y •- • _ 4 r O W _ •n L tl .� EpVj rN _ tivrr G-L u -ar OVyN.. Pi9ryG Gvrr w � .. L..� 2 ` ^� r7 ` V �Vy jOC OQ .n9CC Oticr .--. LVV br 6n•, .r'il •n _ NggT = E C'._i W < +n O G� a w y. 6 u •n L_� V F ~fi r _U n� G G w O V b .'ni n a �� OG •N C 9 a r r o N c D u _+ e ` V c O o t-�O' '•' V E T C O F� _" �. c a r' N �tl 0 6 w.n a �i C• V G .n � -_ C_•'• OI O C r C ~ _ W 60p>O fr J9�V N GV C � O 0 F I i - _b N .O ^ yI N ) �c{ I! I 11 �i ILA 72:: ZZ 19 � U S_✓ nC cL� � t = I 1 ••.ter Oi gip.` C.<, i 1 � o� _ J -E � :\i� ..— o f 1 _✓ J _ =Vo L ✓ 7 C ` `.r q ' L J 0✓= J 1 cIq •'- .� __ •L .`a ..: yr c� c- I —� I 4 ✓ `• c .: Zli n ^ — =`.._�✓ —I = v GL « _ _ « c+ .>L3^i « C ^L " O V � v �� V « C• pC �.Ll n0 _«` ��(l( ✓ « r _ l TV � « P«y OI V V v OC•T _P�.r nJ G7 V c� � G"f u f 11•�1✓ JL _ _ ^ d -> Y-G• u'_do �' � � coc -a > s ' .. .`. of ='c ,' �:., I � " "u _ �' d0 u .: 2j u� < < = �I � dod ley :i � ♦ -ai IIf L` t O - ..� .�. P .. � V Y� � 1 ► 'I �j �=1 .i I � �I � � �i �� �;� J _ � Q C Y �« a G 44 _ TP _ 4« I~ � I � -Jl 9« P ✓ UO C G.v P� 4- N _ .� •+ l j= I - � 1 I I1 1 VCc •n C CYO « �7L G O� 4 C 6 r✓ 9 � 1 Ii11 1 � �r c dL V� r 4d r � �f.' l Y V�4 i'_ yV VT ✓ n `� J Vu 1 ` 011 �`✓ d y✓✓ « •• CL LOPO C. p � � Cv aL � >« Qom. r �C I YGl yO V- V9•. l d � 4 y0� rV =� � � wv =��• == V =. 6« C VPLC fd? L v L•J `.V`• Jr «✓ Y O ✓4 y ���� ! I C✓n C ` Cr0 d CCCY O «� �a•y✓ `Z u Eve e c 2✓ � ja.r G� P C i�� 1 I � u 9 u' eMo� 2 cu`+=L� — � �W cy < c 4 S L ` C _P L O > V 9 > V « _< • a' L _.J ` ` V✓` � S G C .'J O O ✓ O P -« G � O �� �r O T O ? •• I� O L n `.. .Ji. uyi✓ V -r V ` Q V 7•.• N _ V U7 l r �J rV � 'FYI C 60C nv�« _ .'�✓ «� My C` CN� Jr ✓ ✓ SC, C 3 I i CC ' _' t' CL O � l -:5 v`I a 'e d5 = < ' �¢� cG _ r _ cam we 3Lic. �✓ G ` 41d2:5 ,,, u u.� n t ✓ ` _ .arr_ cV o uv uoc o` � T c P4 `� -rd •..« d I¢cI + I � 1 e s. ' Gu Gam..=.. ue•-- on c�-' `✓�= c = i a� L -?- =.c. L.J. u •'•$ �, �_� = _�= =� � � Y red �� �= =�► nJ ! f ; � _=_��_ �z9_� ��« _�a �_ �_:�_ ZZ2 ¢ Y ._ 9 f. 0 •.. S �I VVr E- UE - \ � C O_ LgOwV Vr�y «� i « W V > 4 �„ • � ^i ml PI NI i N� 1 N �� C /I � � ` 0 P '1 u•� 1T 9 e��•o 10 _ u Io w _� o.T+c o o c cc �V 2 `3 2 1� n �.�9 V � � J •f M— `ri I•o+ YY � � ^ T ` < �G r_� • Y 4 L � y r � 7v� �_�� U Iv 011 y V LL C •a— U l— v J �j �I •�� ••yy�� - i y �.� N � V u •VU MKT OI C ��I GV � 9C �O r �'" to � eo_ � � .n ocL. — n� a•J__ c mo To ON S M E- EL%7IR0 %TE.:TAL ASSESSMZ L A\'D C0`;DITIC"AL USF PER`:IT '70. 81-18 - JAS�A - The development of a contractor's sere' ice -ard iucludine t o buildinIs rotal_n� 1'_ -o� ire : _ et ojt 3 j acres of land in the General Industrial1RailJSerr.ed cntegorv, located at 9560 Lucas Ranch Road - APN 210-013-02. Mir. Vairin reviewed the staff report. Chairman bring opened the public hearing. `fr. Juan Baires, contractor, stated that he eras willing to answer any questions. There being none or anv further co=..,ent, the public hearing was closed. Motion: 'Moved by Rempel, seconded b_; Tolstov, carried unani-ouslc, tc adopt Resolution NO. 82-05 approving Conditional Use Permit No. 81-13 in concurrence with the findings for this project. ENVI'ONVE` fAL ASSESS''ENT A%M PARCEL `LaP 7244An industrial subdivision o_ 4.56 acres into 13 lots located on the South side of Foothill, east of `:apl�. Place - AP% 208-351-03. Mir. Paul . ouoeau reviewed the staff report. Mr. Hopson asked about lot 9 described in the staff report, stating that it appeared, to front about 300 feet; �-hereas, let 13 appears tc have less than 100'\et and might have as little as 90 feet of frontage. Mr. Vairin stated that or piirposes of this item, lot 9 had to be included. Commissioner Rempel stated C at if that assumption is used, lot 11 should a'-so be included. Mr. Rougeau replied that since lot 1 is an interici street, it need not be included. Further, that the i. tent is to provide for lots with smaller frontages. Commissioner Ping asked the Commission what their ideas were relative to access on lot 13. Mr. Vairin replied that speaking for the Planning ff, he did not see the necessity for shared access on lot 13. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranica, carried unanimsouly, to adopt Resolution No. S2-06, with the issuance of a negative declaratio. arproving Parcel ?map No. 7244. Planning `;om^�issior+ Minutes -4- Jam.ar­ 13_ 198'' RESOLUTION NO. 82-05B A RESOLUTION OF T,;E RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TINE EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-18 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100 of the Development Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission previously approved the above-described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time; C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental t; the public health, safety, ur welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Project Apolicant Expirizion CUP 81-18 JASKA JANUARY 13, 1986 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF JUNE, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: ® Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary i Resolution 82-058 Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intrcduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of P,an:ho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASS=NT: COMMISSIONERS: _ N7 �0 CITY OF "CHO CUCAMONGA CVCAM2 STAFF REPORT pr pi O ! U�l ^� I; DATE: June 27, 1984 1977 TO: Planning Comnission FROM: Lloyd B_ Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krell, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EV M-ION FOR PARCEL MAP 7441 - TACKETT - located on the south side or La Grande, west of Amethyst Avenue --- APN 202-081-13,14 The above subject project was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on June 9, 1982 for the division of 0.91 acre of land into 4 parcels in the Low (2-4 dulac) Development District. Tentative parcel maps are currently valid for a period of 48 months with appropriate extensions. Parcel Map 7441 was approved for a period of 24 ® months, leaving a period of 24 months for time extensions. This Parcel Map has been reviewed regarding its conformance with the General Plan and has beer found to be in conformance. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Planning Commission grant a 12--nonth extension for Parcel Map 7441. The expiration date will be June 9, 1985. Respectfully subrytitted, I � !I LBH�� :jaa v Attachments E ITEM 8 i .2 .LT }ti10T.GYSMN \I1.2 ,rdt T&Vi-4MT AMP PARCEL MAP .7441 II% THE C'.TY CF •Rar%CefQ CVCAmorZA :Jiy Np lam_.>•]f.R-4.[ 1.,+_ 9-hQ 6 AE=R$ X\ E.Em- Ci(OTS 1]2 OF T. =T 2M :.2.nc .] l v ecssn 1 we 2310 I y1..q.ppSiy 2:1�' .] I L'J.et.sinl c a a c1 :Slit\ wvGLm sG .C1>aliLi I f TRACT NO 123287 v ti i . ]am2tc e { TJ 1 ]3 ' 1 f- - - .-.a«l.•.. is ......<Ra...... _ �.�.=..t.1...!e_G....1I.•v L-A—GRAtVDE ✓ 65.E 67.5 � � 4 N a n � a _ -ss .ASS LO•e['Q g DRIVE 3 I - � J GS c. . —3 i i 1 6 � If-B y_ ?ROJECT — rr SITElilt � � i I•� u — � 1 'i 771 J,EL r T I Ll pp I : Rz' 1 I C,-cc-"io . title CITY OF RANCHO CUCA��10\'GA ' 5'`'� � - T441 ¢;,v?;�y - AAA ?; ENGINEERING DIViSlON F I' `;----.�' VICINi"i'Y MAP page ® CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Donald Tackett TENTATIVE MAP NO. P.M. 7441 LOCATION:_- North side of Lomita Drive DATE FILED: 4-13-82 321 '_ west of Amethyst NUMBER OF LOTS:_ 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 2 of Tract 2190, M.B. RECEIPT NUMBER: 31 , Page 69, San Bernardino Co. FEE 5273 ZONE: R-1 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: J. Richard Newton GROSS ACREAGE: .91 ADDRESS:_624 West "I" Street MINIP•UM LOT AREA: Ontario, California 91762 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD 0::7•1ER(S) ADDRESS PHONE Don Tackett _ 335 East McKinley 629-1549 Pomona, Ca. 91767 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications I . Dedication by final map of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights-of-way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additionai feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other 3. Rights of vehicular access snali be limited as follows• 4. Street vacation required for: _ 5. feaster Plan of Streets revision required for:_ 6. The f0l1OWing per*zter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7441 Ima_ rovements page (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for 7. Construct full street improvements (includinEuild,ng permit ) —� sidewalk, cn2 drive approach per lot g curb and interior streets. parkway trees and gutter. A.C. pavement, 8 $• Construct the following Missingi street lights) on a17 *includin landscaping and irrigation a meter mprovements on the following streets: CURB TT & A.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET STREET c STREET NArgE GJTTER PVhii. Lomita WA1 K J Ap?q. TREES LIGHT] i MEDIAN X X X i X X ! X SLAND OTHER La Grande v n X —,X X X X i a i X 9- Construct all Storm drain. and drainanstructure,.; map, or as required by the Cit a � as shnwn on the tentative X 10. provide all utility services to each lotincludingsanit ' electric are to bmune Power. gas, telephone and cable televisin.conduit. s qj�s' water, X 11. p underground. Develo er shah coordinate utilities any power poles or other existing pubere necessary, pay for the relocation of 12. tiOns Install appropriate street name sipns7andutilitiescas necessary. X 1S- Developer types approved by the City Engineer.F S with locz- provements- Provide a37 construction plans for drainage and scree X 14 Sanitar Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. t �m warer systems A letter shall be designed District standards• leter to Cucamonga X 75. Street light locations, as required, is required_ County hater California Edison Company and ured, arerto be approved by the Southern Poles with underground service. he City o' Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative 15- The following existing streets being A.C. overlay: g torn up by new services will require an __ 37. The ro owing speci 7r dir.�sions widths) are not a pp. oYed: -e- , cu -de-sac r: gi, street section, ]8. The to owing existing Streets ire They will require: substandard : ADorovals and Fees _ This subdivision shall be subject San Bernardino County Flood Contro�ADisnd conditions of a X_ 20. pproval from CALTRANS/ Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen ties in have Approval that may be receved ' of the final map will be subject ram them. to any requirements RUE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7441 Page 3 _ 21 . Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: B. City: C. County CusL Abatement District: _ D. D. I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 1' deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: _ F. Other: Mao Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two-way traffic and parking on all affec d streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. Al corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of-wayline in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Ma� shall ra:�rdad prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrt :ognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. ® Parcel Man Waiver _ 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map CertifiCdte, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. (Bonding is required prior to ER Recording for All Parcels i DRAINAGE 0 Building permit for 1 _ 29. Pr000sed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to-the provisions of that program and Ordnarce No. 24. 3D. A drainage channel and/cr flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go ender sidewalks through culverts. 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following loc"-tiorts: 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies wit be reeuireo to assess ess impact or increased X 34. Provide ?rivate drainage easement and concrete "V" gutter on the south property line on Parcel 2 and the east property line of Parcel 3 for the drainage of Parcel 1 S 2. These easements will be delineated on the map. RICE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. — Page Miscellaneous _ 35. Just abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 30. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37 . This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation, 32- All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: _ 39. Proper grading and erosion control , inciudi the tion or damage to offsite PrevenLation of sedimenta- 40 A property shall benA rovided for as required. preliminary Soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. 41 . The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. _ 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1 ) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise Of any public entity or public utility right-of-way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section.43_ At the time of Final Clap submittal , the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets) , copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. 14ultiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. CITY OF Rk4CHO CUUMNGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: RCE 20 y n. .5. Y� � • I o: ... _ _ 1 0it RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7441 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2(b) of Ordinance No. 28.-B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described tentative parcel map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following inndiings. - A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension or: Parcel Map Applicant Expiration 7741 Don Tackett June 9, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary _ 4 iiiiiiiiiiiiiij I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resclutior. was duly and an regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 198n, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOI GA -,X)C Xf0 STAFF REPORT ��° "��. cj - o i z U I> DATE: June 27, 1984 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kral!, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7326 - KOBACKER - located on the southeast corner of Saker Avenue and Feron Bou evard - APN 207-271-31 The above subject project was tentativeiy approved by Planning Commission on July 14, 1982 for the division. of 12.54 acres of land into 2 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1.1 . Tentative parcel maps are currently valid for a period of 48 months with appropriate extensions. Parcel flap 7326 was approved for a period of 24 months, leaving a period of 24 months for '- ime extensions. This Parcel Map has been reviewV regarding its conformance with the General Plan and has been found to be in conformance. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Planning Commission grant a 12-month extension for-Parcel Map 7326. The expiration date will be July 14, 1985. Respectfully submitted, LBH: jaa Attachments <' ITEM C ra • :� I • . � I•t : i•:a`+t�,!..'$ ...✓ew I , •°' .. a�� I i, '�I —� .. ? I � r _ _ i I' . r I illlilp:;rl � lctll1....".•. -_i •i I.. -� ��.� _ 6 .fir ti :� ;# ..I I III � •_ •� q :: I � d' :'' i . ` —'� � a€ Y'= � � •'II � I ilk -r''� � ��'; a � p'= •`F 3 I cQ� � , III '• 4i I' 1+' 11 � � OZ - e - ':f_ is ". : I, _i.- tl 1 'i ., Ip _ •>•, � � I `h - + �__� ` 1 '_ - _jI' :`r is � ���•- ±: •+:`=: '.' F � 1 � �_ Vic: - etc , �� _ ' ` '-. . � • _ '-:i t.•: • �Y bra- a - 3: i 7 F 32 all :.I .. ...� 1 . ♦ : II I -- a_•f_i_{: w� "r 71lM3AI •rr• •fT•a—+ �r•Y7J J!! — •_ t ® III ! I II IFEE PROJECT SITE J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi%iONGA tetle; � w9 P.M. 7326 ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY 1Ir\I' �m page THE KOEACKER COMPANY June 4, 1934 • is ,_ .•� Ms. Barbara Krall Community Development Department Engineering Division 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 Re: Time Extension for Parcel Map 7326 Dear Pis. Krall; Enclosed please find the $62.G0 extrtnsion fee which you requested. In January of 1983 we sold our California operation to Volume Shoe Corporation and did not anticipate doing further business :'.n the State of California. If such had been the c.;se, we more than likely wculd have sold the entire parcel without reques: ;ag a lot split. Hovever, we have again commenced doing business in California and our warehouse is again operational. We are presently reassessing our position concerning the lot split and will inform you as soon as a decision is made. If you have any further questions, please contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, THE KOBACF:cR COPLPANL Y o I George j. Arnold, Corporate Secretary & Legal Counsel GJA:lam Enclosure 0 -4 66M TUSVNG RD..P.O. BOX 16751,COLUMBUS.OH 43216.8751 • (614)864.7700 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME: EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7326 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2(b) of Ordinance No. 28.-S, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described tentative parcel map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings:. A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious tc properties Gr improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension or: Parcel Map Applicant Expiration 7326 The Kobacker Co. July 14, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CJ .Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST:_ Riccl— omez, Deputy Secretary s � -y I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the P1?rning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly anti regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of th_ City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day o:` June, 1984, by the following vcte-to-dit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGMEER`S REPORT FILED BY: Kobacker Stores Inc. TENTATIVE MAP uo. 7326 LOCATION: SEC of Baker and Feror Blvd. DATE FILED- June 7, 1982 NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lot 31 lying north of theZECEIPT NUA'SER- right of way of the So. Calif. R.R. Co. , Section 9, FEE:— $273 T1S, R7W, Co. of San Bernardino as reccrded in Book 4 cage o cvr-nr� •n tFo flfrnn of the ZONE: General Industrial - Subarea 3 north. 160 feet. TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Richard Newton GROSS ACREAGE: 12.54 ADDRESS: 624 West I Street MINIMUM LOT AREA Ontario, CA 91762 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: 40 RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE Kobacker Stores,inc. P. 0. Box 27935 (614) _ Columbus, Ohio 43227 864-7700 REPOPT OF THE CITY E'dGINEER Dedications 1 . Dedication by final map of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as -shown on the tentative map. x ?_ r1.edication by final map of the following missing rights-of-way on the followino Streets: _ 3i additional feet or. Feron Blvd. as an "Offer to Dedicate" additional feet on additicnal feet on Corner P/L radius required :r. Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows:_ 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required fcr: b. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7326 Face 40 Im^rovements (Bonding is required prior to ® Recording for Parcel 2 El Building permit for arce ) i 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C.Cpavement, Sidewalk, ona drive approach per lot, porkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. X 8. Construct the following missing improvements or, the followirg streets: *including landscap;r.g and irri ation on meter CURB A.C. SIDE- RIVE I STREts STREET PtEDIAN STREET PIAi•lE . GJTTER PVMT. WALK APPR. + TREEES LIGHTS ISLAND* OTHER Feror. j X X X X X X ( I 1 X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable tetevision.conduit_ All utilities are to be underground. X 11 . Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of aTl� power poles or other existing public utilities as neceszaryI X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and str ;7- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer_ X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is X 15- Street light locations, as required, are to be wired_ oved by the S California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamongashall obehern decorative Pol16. The following egexisting streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay- _ 77. The os owing specific dimensions, i.e. , cu,-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved:_ 18. Tha o; owing existing streets are substas:dara : T'nev will require: Aporovals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ ' San Bernardino County Flood Control District . X 20. ' Approvals have riot been secured from all utilities and other intere! ted agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map wi7. 1 be sub';act to any that may be received from them. eluiresrents RCE 20 TEPlTATIVE MAP fd0. 7326 Page 3 X 21 . Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans, for:B. City: x C. County Dust Abatement District: aC time or ui ing ermi Su n D. 0_1.5. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: x E. Cucamonga County Water District: Water and Sewer F. Other: Mao Control 22. If only a portion of this '.slap is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two-way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final ;nap: _ 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of-way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26 The boundary of the Tentative !•lap needs clarification as fol ows:_ 27. The bo:-der shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or ® title exDlanation required_ Parcel MaD Waiver _ 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to Ll Recurdirg . ,)r ) 0 Building. perm: fir i 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to- tire provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. _ 30. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. Iwater surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: 33. .Broadale hyhdrologic 5VJdies willa requir to assess Impact oT inc- =l ® runoff. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7326 Page Miscellaneous Y _ 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition. of issuance of the grading permit for this project. _Y 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. _ 37 . This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. _ 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown: as re- qui red: x 39. Pro-er grading and erosion control, includingthe tio� or damage preventation of sedimenta- _ 40. A preliminary�Soils freport pwi llrnot sbelrequil be redv for dthis site for as efor rthe ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Divisionw prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. x 41 . The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County 'dater District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. _y 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C) (1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the/ property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise® of any Public entity or public utility right-of-way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified Time limits of said Section. x 43. At the time of Final Map submittal , the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lialss. X 4:. Improvement Certificate for the construction of standard street improvem:7n.ts, including but not limited to: curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, dr4v�,approach, street trees and street lights, for Parcel 1 shall be noticed on the map X 46. Temporary private easement for access across Parcel 1 to Parcel 2 along the existing paved access shall be delineated on the final map. This easement ;hall remain in force until sucn time as the extension of Feron Blvd. to Baker Ave. is constructed. X 47. Tne existing paved access road shall be realigned at the east end to connect to the proposed Feron Blvd. X 48. Detailed landscape and irrigation, plans shall be approved by the Planning Divisior prior to recordation of the Parcel Mlap. Landscaping shall be bonded for prior to recordation of map. These plans must be coordinated with Street Improvement Plans. X 49. Any on-site utility lines that may cross parcel 1 to serve parcel 2 shall be located in private easements and delineated on the final map. X 50. An irrevocable offer of dedication of an easement for storm drainage purpose along the easterly parcel boundary shall be required. An improved drainage device satisfactory to the City Enyaneer shall be constructed along the easement to convey runoff from Feron Blvd. southerly to existing ditch at railroad right of way. RCE 20 e - TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7326 Page 5 X 51 . Uti'ity companies are to be contacted for any requirements for easements. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD S. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: 6�L� (9� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO�NGA GucwngpM STAFF REPORT �9. . NEI Z DATE: June 27, 1984 � TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONME14TAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8477 - STEPHENSON - A division o .49 acre into parcels in t E Low Res UaDis enttrict (2-4 'du/ac) located on the north side of Lomita Drive between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues - APN 202-081-35 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. ® B. Purpose: To divide .49 acre into 2 parcels. C. Location: North side of Lomita Drive between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 _24 acre - 10,454 sq. ft. Parcel 2 .25 acre - 10,890 sq. ft. Total acre E. Existing Zoning: Low (2-4 du/ac) Residential Development District. F. Exist ng Land Use: Parcel 1 - vacant Parcel 2 - existing single family residence. G. Surrounding Land Use: Nortn - existing apartments South - existing single family residence East - existing single family residence West - existing single family residence H. SL roundi, General Plan and Development Code Designations: or esiaentia I - du ac South - Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) East - Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) West - Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) a; ITEM 0 s PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcei Map 8477 June 27, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The property slopes to the south at approximately An existing single family house is located on Parcel 2. II. ANALYSIS: This parcel map divides .49 acre of land into 2 parcels in the Low Residential Development District (2-4 du/ac). The average lot size is 10,672 sq. ft. which is in conformance with the General Plan and Development Code designations. There is an existing single family residence on Parcel 2. Off-site improvements are required to be instalied at time of recordation of the parcel map. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper_ Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Plannino Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Corr:..:ssion can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully submjtted, i LEH:$' :jaa Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity Resclution City Engineer's Report Initial Study t✓-oC TENTATVE PARCEL MAP CVO. 8477 ...... - y IN<lia O YLt.O fl[IIYR.L l.- 1C46 L .qp' )y ir•r.rw 4r1.4Mwu �LrO..YcrY M i' I I>/. IYyR 1� � I �K I 1• ene.anLLVLL. mlrn. fill iI 1 b.N t L•�n avMr M1C L�ru Au. n4 t YL1Cn1La py � >Y-Li•lY 4p.lI YtM r Ip-aY'YL VICIMT7 MAP .pI 10 Y4 Q�01L EI[S. 1. Iw yyra.Y M 4 pAYY NY.u.Lr•(.4 L+.Y I Ip., 6•IY x�11 Y.•yrY•L.rx>N rLn�).py, ). ar wr.a.y lr.y la.yl.ryns..Lyytrl r I — 1. i.L yrtw•N>ati n l•-v.Yr rW I.•L• Lm m. S 33.aL y.N. l 'l I I ti �Q u aaume IS RIXT rl r TRACT TRACT Na 2190 '� 11j _ NO 219C I k LOT S y LOT 3 w� L -- ' \ �( 1.9WTJ1 V � ra Pr ' 0 -3 tvT` . a j �1 r U4� r-. LL- ~ t c F 77 1 ,t: I i i ' I�1 rr- rr title; CITY OF RANCHO cuc,,v 10\G� i� •: yK .:. A ��i_ R 4 7 7 ENGINEERING DIV;SION 1977 --�" VICINITY MAP pag� 111� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review .Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part 11 of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declarat?.on will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information zeport should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Fa r-c e f-477 APPLICANT°S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE, S1GC�. eYl� C141c G-1 n_d. Ci 17 ��- qqp - 5'Zo Co U N;I-ME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Ld h F �} G TO .-, I a ' LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) cf4-(U Lcw ; ,' c�p Ti- ivy _4pN 'Q7 — OF, / - 3S LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: G:..GAnACNGA Co�.N7Y yJl1Tc2 TD1sTkicT s f;r PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 2 I oT Pc; v-c e M a arse nC.j o dnfl Che t NA/ J / ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND FZUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: ro rA i- J E eT Q r e a i 5 oTCorc �C. �/Z Ac.rC i DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLFeNTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL„ HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR/USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : 717 . J Too �a�/ ;17' d/ r,� 2 />i. ,.-./.V •--S':ffng/� F�.nrr. /,/ /'7nmP5 /4 rI /nc� !cam +4 �/.o eN _� a N/�� � Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? o , I-2 (}_ / WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S.' Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: _ IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further unk3erstard that additional information may be required to be submitted before an a%equate evaluation can be made by Ile Development Review Committee. ® Date �- 3o Signatur. �, ��• / rF,n� Title Qn e r cam- cEq 1-3 , / RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be P -ovided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessir:g the ability o£ the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. : Specific Location of Project: PHASE -T PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin constriction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model and € of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range C I-4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOL:71ON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF T::E CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL RAP NUMBER 8477 {TENTATIVE PARCEL M,.--D NO. 8477) LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LOMITA BE174EEN HELLMAN AND X4ETHYST AVENUES WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Njmber 8477, submitted by David and Evelyn Stephenson and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the north side of Lomita between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues being a division of a portion of Lot 4, Tract No. 219C :s recorded in Book 31• gage 69 of Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, State of California; and WHEREAS, on May 4, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting -evil-N of the above-described T. -tative Map; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 1984, the ?lanning Cornnission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. Tnat the improvem•ert of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and ;mprovements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmenta—�mpacts ana a Negative Declaration is issued on June 27, 1984. SECTION 3: That the reco mne Tentative Parcel Map No. 8477 is approved subject to � a onditions of Approval pertaining *hereto. APPROVED AND ADCPTED THIS 27th DAY OF JUTE, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC,%MONGA 8Y Denn's L. Stout, Chairman ATTES'i : Stick fiomez, Deputy Secretary p-9 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, .do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co rumission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1984, tr the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: : VISSTONERS: ABSENT: CLIOMISS10NERS: ,D-10 r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ® RECOMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: North side of Lomita between TENTAT'VE PARCEL PAP NO: 8477 Hellman and Amethyst Avenues DATE FILED: May 4, 1984 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A division of a portion h11MBER OF LOTS: 2 of Lot 4, Tract 2190 as recorded in Book 31, GROSS ACREAGE: .49 Page 59 of Maps, Records of San BernarUino ASSESSOR PARCEL HO: 202-081-35 County, State of California DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR David & Evelyn Stephenson same Lane & Associates 9410 Lomita Drive 902 W. 9th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Upland, CA 9178E Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the ® Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the followir- streets: 4 additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights if vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as fol ows: S. Recipreral access easements and maintenance agreenents ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all commor: roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -1- i 6. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer-s requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to V e satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for all parcels. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the 4ollowing: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering al : parcels to �`c: satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and/or prior to issuance of buildino permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucaanonga Municipal Code, Title 15, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreemec,z and post security with the City guaranteeing the requir,:d construction prior to recordation of the map ad/or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. F�vement, sidewalk, drive approaches, Parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot vide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all h; if- section streets. 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for all parcels urb , A.C. Side- DrIvel trees Street I A.C. I Me ` an f Street Name Gutter I Pvmt. Walk 1Appr.) Trees ; Lights Overlay , Island* Other! Lomita Dr. X X—j x�- X X 1 X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter -2- X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _ X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. 8. install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to ana approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 21. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be instailed co City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final nap. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to th.d City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- _Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accord< nce with the Uniform Suilding . Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of ;:he final subdivision map or issuance of building permit v;M chever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. 1 copy of the Cavenants, Conditions and Restrictions tC.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sani` ry sew•ar and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptatice is required. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTranVSan Bernardino County Flood Control District. X o. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. _4 .4 a-off R X 7. The filing of the tentative map or aDprova7 of same does not b guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be avaiiahle at the time building permits -are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be f asked to certify the availability of capacity Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. fi. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plae. A detailed trail plan ind;cating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control , in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and/or prior to building permit issuance or 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Verification of the location of utility services (gas, sewer water) on individual parcels must be proviaed to the Building Department prior to building permit issuance. •f CITY OF RANCHO CUCARMEA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cgsamov STAFF REPORT °7 , . L- I z1 DATE: June 27, 1964 isr, I TO: Plann.ng Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician S0jECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8500 - R. J. INVESTMENTS - A ivision of . acres into one parcel in the Medium :.esidential District (8-14 du/ac) located on the west side of Baker Avenue, south of Foothill 2')ulevard - APN 207-581-57 and 107-571-59 (Ref. D.R. 84-08) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose. To combine 9.028 acre, of land into 1 parcel for the e o ve pment of an apartment complex on tonigh"s agenda as D. R. 84-08. C. Location: West side of Baker Avenue, south of Foothill Blvd. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 9.028 acres. E. Existing Zoning- Medium (8-14 du/ac) Development District. F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Use: Nort�t existing condo development and railroad right-of-wly South - existing single family residence East - existing condo developm?nt and single family residence West - existing single family residence Ei. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Design at:ons: North - medium - du/ac) Scuth - low (2-4 du/ac) East - medium (8-24 du/ac) and low (2-4 du/ac) Vest - low (2-4 du/ac) ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8506 June 27, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant with the exception of several foundation remnants and a variety of trees. Ar. unimproved storm drain channel runs through the property. II. ANALYSIS: R. J. Investments has submitted the attached parcel map to conD ne two existing parcels into one development of an apartment complex project that is on tonight's agenda as D. R. 84-08. As shown on the attached map, the Master Plan Storm Drain will be required as a condition of building permit issuance. This storm drain will eliminate the need for the existing drainage channel and will eliminate a flooding problem for properties to the south of the site. Net storm runoff onto Baker Avenue from the site will be unchanged under the present development plan due to the draining of minor flows tc the public streets on the west property line. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has co—pleted Part iI of the Initial Study, the a "ronmental checklist, and -s conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. iV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Pubiic Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Ne:aspaper. Postino at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Res ectfully submitted, LBz -SK:j as Attachments: Map - Tentatije & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report It.i ti al StuG,y � E ,yTA ' 1VE PARCEL MAP NO. 8506 ® \ 7N T'HE CITY ypO F.RANC[M[0,CUCA M0Nu4 �--j�- -T —71 I .i . 'mot. \t —z =^,_ }. •r�-, c IN it - �� \ •f J�� t r \-�`\ \ ��n'=�r t Imo• _ I I�- - -4Tla�I LA! 17 Iz �i`:.i�.�.r'-r! / �' 1 _. t.1 bJ♦.1/".•. .y: I, r_ ; / . / ,..i!' i � � � � 1�1�1�_ ri / J �OTT ''Jill - - -f ✓ ? � I� III I � I� • 1 r� !, j �A � I I 1 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.%lo.N title; C A A 4f � P.M. 8506 ENGINEERING DIVISiON — J 19—n VICINi rY AI.xP - - -� y,agc s- � ® FOOTHIL, \ \ BLVD PARCEL MAP NO. 850E f R.J. INVESTMENTS EXISTING I 'J EXISTING ID'x6' EXIST RANCHO CUCAMONGA APTS. SITE BOX CULVERT DEBRIS BAsit; O'0Os < I Q . 1 RICIRDO DR!- 1 PRO?OSE&% ! C I 60 R.C.P C I aPP GX. LCC.i Y i C � I I � � I EXIST.NATURAL ' ® V`CITCA FERNLEA' OR. In= I.9cfs J INLETS EXIST EXIST. CMP INLET SEALED ALTERNATE ..A l A o � I EXIST. C.M.P l i � n SEZLED I� I EXISTING 1 a IMPROVE[ n f a�DITCH xi \Im' \ 10` 1 y! ARROW ROUTE titie• CI i Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' PM 8506 ENGINEERINC DIVISION A 197�� DRAINAGE MAP � �'S page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGa ' INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - Tn be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form mast be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Commaittee will make one of three determinations: 13 The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Envirorn :ntal Impact Report will be prepay;-,'; or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: R. J. Investments Apartments APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: R. J. Investments, 1706? x1m=hy 4vc-nn- Trvinoe rA a-)-,14 71A/660-1Caa NANIE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTAi.TED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Hardv Strozier, c/o Urban Assist. lix. 3151 Airway Avenue. Bldg. A-2, Costa Mesa. CA 92626 714/SS6-9890 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ) 1/2 block south of Foothill on the west side of Baler. AP 20?-581- 57 #58-, S71-19 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS : None identified at this time. �'l0 7 PROJECT DESCRTFTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 126 apartment units on 9.0 acres . ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSE: BUILDINGS, IF AI,,Y: 9.0 acres. No existing structures on site. Proposed building coverag_ will be 66,6na sn. ft. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOPliATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, AN" CULTURAL, HISTORIC.3..T CR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND TEE DESCRIPTIO_a OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTPRES AND T1iETR U38 (aTT7eCH NECESSARY SHEETS) : The project site is vacant and has hi�ter',caily bcen utili=ed for agricultural operations. There exists several foundation remnants of these oast operations in the s w corner of the site. The site sicoes gently at o to the s/ on ccrsists of a variety of native anti introauced grasses. An .ntermittart riparian corridor traverses tRe site from north to sout;i several trees (Sycamore and Blue Gum ucaiyptus) exist along this riparian edge. The proiect site is surrounded on three sides by resl. ntial development of mixed use are density. On the northern edge. the _ Pacific Electric Rai-road exists with operations aver giro 5 ner week. A potential fault zone exists on site. zeneraliv located in the upper ' S of the site Units have been placed away from zone. � taA A expanded-bio.otL �sessmen� and geoloeical assessment 's _ attached to this initial study. The study identifies no significant _ biological communities on site. Is the project part cf a larcer project, or ._ c. a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO =' I-2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO x_ 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _x 2, create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? t 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 9 X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla_*mnables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: nine (9) --.xisting Blue Gum Eucalyptus inSycamores may be removed. Replacement trees will e i entiHe in the conceptual landscape plan. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. i Gv1 -/ / Date �3/23/6 Signature _. „ii Title�� 1-3 �' RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Develoner and Tentative Tract No. c R. J. Investments - TP;d 9506 Specific Location of Project: 1/2 block south of =oothill on the west side of Baker PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAT, 1. Number of sinale family units: r 2. Number of multiple family units: 126 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 9/1/84, 4. Earliest date of occupancy: 6/1/85 Model # and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range 32 1 Bdrm. S590/mo. 55 2 Bdrm. 650/mo. 39 3 Bd=:n. 67S/mo. I-4 .16 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8506 (TENTA.TIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8506) LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BAKER AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8506, submitted by R. J. Investments and consisting of 1 parcel , located on the east side of Baker Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, being a division of a portion of Lot 6, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 'West, San Bernardino Base and t-leridian and a portion of the 1/2, of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Lot 11, Section 9, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable_ for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create signi:icant adverse envirorsnenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on June 27, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8506 is approved subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. ® PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Cnairrman C -/d ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECO.`"ENDEO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: West side of Baker Ave. , south TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO: 8506 Foothill Blvd. DATE FILED: March 26, 1984 LEGJAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 6, NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 Section 9, T1S, R7W, S.B.M. and a portion.. of GROSS ACREAGE: 9.028 207-5d -57&58 of the 1/2 of the vest 1/2 of the EasL 1/2 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 207-571-79 of Lot _ , Section 9, TiS, R W, Co. of San Bndo, State of Caiifornia DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR R. J. Investments Frank A. Klaus L. D_ King, Inc. 17062 Murphy Ave. _ 17062 Murphy 517 N. Euclid Ave. _ Irvine, CA 92714 Irvine, CA 92714 Ontario, CA 91762 Improvement and dedication, requirements in rccordance with Title 16 of the ® Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall he made of the following rights-of-way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C-C.&R,s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -i- X 6. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City --engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidawalks meander through private property, Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance. 2. A lien agreement crust be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and/or prior to issuance of building permit Tor_ Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Rar,ch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.3L. 120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and/or building permit issuance, X _ 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of L6-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be -onstructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance. (( cur b i e- rive reet Street A. Median Modified Street Name i Gutter I Pvmt. I Walk Aopr. Trees Li hts Overla Island* Cul-d -sac Baker Ave. X X I X X X X Ricardo X Fern Leaf ( X Carrillo X *Tnr ii,riec 1 nd n:r.. nd i ®. a s a, a.. irrigation on meter -2- t: X 4. Prior to aoy work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. X 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: Master Plan Storm Drain (refer to Condition #12, Page 5). X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- C-�y Grading X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in -accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and acz oted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading pian. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. X 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. Cereral Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flocd Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) X Other: Southern Pacific Railroad 2. A copy of the r.ovenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructor. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans/San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 5. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -4- X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarant--e that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and/or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments r under Assessment District 82-1 among the newly created parcels. r X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/or z showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. A drainage easement 25 feet wide, as shown on the tentative map, shall be dedicated to the City. X 12. At the time of development of the parcel , the applicant shall be required to construct a portion of the Master Plan Storm Drain (Line 32B) from Southern Pacific Railroad to the existing CMP culvert across Baker Ave. (approximately 300 feet south of mao boundary) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Storm drainaaa fee for the project shall be credited towards the cost of the storm drain and a reimbursement agreement will be executed to cover the cost which exceeds the drainage fee. s 5: t. 4. CITY OF RANCY.O CUCAMONGA Y LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: � -5- Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF IRLPORT o�1c DATE: June 27, 1984 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84-08 - R. J. INVESTMENT - The development of a 126 unit apartment complex an 9.03 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 du/ac) located on the west side of Baker, south of Foothill Boulevard - APN 207-581-57, 58; 207-571-79. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of the site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of 126 apartment units. C. Location: West side of Baker, south of Foothill (Exhibit "A") . D. Parcel Size: 9.03 acres. E. Project Density: 13.96 dwelling units per acre. F. Existing Zoning: Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac). G. Existing Land Use: Vacant. H. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: (Exhibit "A") North - Townhouses; Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac). South - Single Family Residential ; Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac). East - Townhouses and Mobile Home Park; Medium and Low Medium Residential . West - Single Family Residential ; Low Residential (2-4 du/ac). I. General Plan Desi nations: roject Site - Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) North - Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) South - Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) East - Medium (4-14 du/ac) and Low Medium Residential (4-8 iu/ac) West - Low Residential (2-4 duiac) ITEM F PLAN,iING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84-08/R. J. Investments Page 2 J. Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant and slopes to the southeast at a 2 grade. The site is traversed from north to south by an intermittent stream and contains nine mature California Sycamore and Eucalyptus trees, as shown in Exhibit "B". A potentially active fault segment exists in the northwest corner, see Exhibit "C". K_ Applicable Regulations: The Development Code pernits multiple- fami ly dwellings in the Medium Residential District at 13.96 du/ac under the Optional Development Standards. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project includes '26 apartment units clustered around common open space areas. Typically, the units are stacked in two-story buildings with floorplans ranging ir. size from 893 sq. ft. to 1,104 sq. ft. Access to the project will be provided via Baker Avenue and Fernleaf Drive with gated fire access from Via. Carillo Lane through the existing tracts to the west. B. issues- The issues associated with this infill project which the Panning Commission must consider are: 1_ Does the proposed project meet the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the De•elopment Code? 2. Is the proposed project compatible with the surrounding neighborhood? In regards to the first issue, it is the intent of the Development Code to promote proper transitions of density and development compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. The Residential Growth Management Review System establishes a review process to accomplish this goal that utilizes A three- fold set of criteria: (I) Absolute Policies, (2) Development Standards, and (3) Design Guidelines. The Development Code has provisions which provide for Planning Commission review of a residential project to determine if it would be detrimental r` to the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Development Code. The General Plan designated tois site as Medium Residential with a density range of 4-14 lu/ac. The Development Code subsequently also designated this -,ite as Medium Residential ; however, the density range was furth,-- defined as 8-14 du/at'. The intent of the General Plan was to establish residential density categories with a range of building intensities that allow flexibility to deal with various site constraints and PLANNING COM+IISSION STAFF REPORT DR 34-08/R. J. Investments Page 3 opportunities. The range of housing Prnu. t may be all--:ed in the Medium Residential Land Use . y is shown in Exhibits "L" and "M". Multiple family i 3-story housing types are permitted subject to the discretionary review of the Planning Commission. The Medium Residential category was intended to provide for proper transition of density "as a buffer between load density residential areas and areas of higher density ... Building intensity at the lower end of the dens?ty range would be apprin-:ate adjacent to low and very low density residential areas. Housing types would still be characterized primarily by detached housing units", as stated in the General Plan. Specifically, it was the City's position to designate this site as Medium Residential to provide a transition of density between the low density single family detached tract to the wrest and the medium density townhouses to the east_ The proposed project density is 13.96 du/ac; whereas the single family tract to the west is 4-5 du/ac and the townhouses to the east are 8.75 du/ac. Therefore, this project represents a significant increase in density from the surrounding area which conflicts with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and the Development Code and the purpose of the Medium Residential District. The proposed apartment project may be more appropriate, as stated in the General Plan, adjacent to parks and other open spaces along transit routes and major and secondary thoroughfares, and near activity centers such as recreational centers, libraries, shopping centers and entertainment areas. Past Planning Commission action regarding infill projects has been to require proper transition of density between lower density residential areas and areas of higher density. Therefore a lower density project on this infill site would be consistent with past Planning Commission policy. The second issue relates to the impact to surrounding properties based upon the proposed project. This project is in conflict with the following policies and provisions of the Development Code: 1. The project must be consistent with the General Plan (Section 17.08.050 A.1) . The proposed density is at the upper end of the density range which conflicts with the intent of the Medium Residential category to provide building intensity at the lower end of the density range adjacent to the low density residential area to the west as a transition of density. �'3 PLANNING COMMiSSIO('! STAFF REPORT DR 84-08/R. J. Investments Page 4 2. The project must be compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment of the site and neighborhood (Section 17.08.050 8.1) . The proposed 2-story apartment product was reviewed by the Design Review Committee and determined to be incompatible with the adjacent 1-story single family neighborhood in terms of architectural design -- scale, bulk, building height and neighborhood character. 3. The project design must effectively mitigate the aesthetic conflict between the proposed development and surrounding land uses (Section 17.08.050 8.2) . The project design consists of large, 2-story apartment buildings that are significantly different from the surrounding neighborhood in terms of architectural design -- scale, bulk and building height. The Design Review Committee recommended that the project design does not adequately address this concern and could result in an aesthetically offensive site. 4. The project design should preserve mature vegetation as a design element (Section 17.08.090 C.1). The applicant proposes to remove seven of the nine Sycamore and Eucalyptus trees. 5. The mass and scale of the buildinas should be proportionate to the surrounding development (Section 17.08.090 0.3). As previously discussed, the proposed large, 2-story buildings are significantly greater in mass and scale than the adjacent single family detached homes. The Development Code established Optional Development Standards for residential projects such as this project which are filed up to the maximum density permitted by the density range. These standards were "intended to provide high standards for the development of projects of superior quality and compatibility ... to ensure proper transitions and buffers from lower intense residential uses." The ultimate density allowed is to be determined through review of the opportunities and constraints of each site and the public hearing process. The Planning Commission has the authority to reasonably condition any residential development to ensure proper transition and compatibility to adjacent residential developments. The project design consists of two-story 8-plex apartment buildings. These buildings have been set back at least 50 feet from the Low Residential District to the west, as required by the Development Code. The applicant proposes a heavily landscaped buffer along the west boundary (Exhibits "D" and "H") to screen the two-story apartments from the existing one- r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 84-08/R. J. Investments Page 5 story single family detached homes. Open space areas, parking areas and driveways are also proposed to provide separation and buffering between the different land uses. The architectural theme proposes a hip roof design with composition shingles, stucco and wood trim to reflect the materials used in the single family homes to the west. C. Design Review Committee: The Committee's eonsens_is was that e propose o-story apartments and project density may not be appropriate in terms of providing proper transition of density and neighborhood compatibility between the existing single detached homes to the west and the townhouses to the east. Further, the Committee felt that the proposed architecture did not adequately meet the intent of the General Plan and Development Code Absolute Policies regarding i,cighborhood compatibility in terms of scale, bulk and building height. The Committee recommended that the applicant prepare alternative design solutions that break up the large building mass along the west boundary for compatibility with the one- story single family neighborhood. Further, the Committee recommended that the architectural design be redesigned, emphasizing a single family character in terms of articulating each dwelling unit to provide individual identity per General Plan policy. The Committee recommended that the site plan be redesigned to preserve the five existing mature Sycamore trees in accordance with the Development Code site plan design guidelines. The applicant proposes to save two and remove three Sycamore trees, as shown in Exhibit "D". In response to the Committee recommendations, the applicant lowered the central roof peak line to help reduce the scale and bulk of the buildings. Further, a densely landscaped buffer was provided along the west boundary to screen the two-story elevations from the existing single family neighborhood. These revisions were reviewed informally by the Committee and were considered to inadequately address their concerns. Therefore, the Committee does not recommend approval of the project design as proposed based upon inconsistencies with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Development Code. D. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Committee was concerned that adequate secondary emergency access be provided. Based upon the surrounding street pattern, the fire and Sheriff's Departments recommended that a fully paved street connection to Fernleaf Drive be prW ded to facilitate timely response of emergency vehicles. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84-08/R. J. Investments Page 6 E. Gradinq Committee: The Grading Committee approved the conceptual grading plan subject to provision for positive secondary surface drainage to Baker Street which is intended to prevent ponding in the parking areas near the south boundary. This project will include construction of a storm drain pipe from the railroad tracks south to Baker and into an existing channel on the east side of Baker (south of the mobile home park) . This storm drain is intended to alleviate historic flooding problems for property owners to the south. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist, visited the site, and reviewed the supplemental Fault Investigation and biological information. Based upon this review, Staff has determined that the project could have the following significant adverse environmental impacts: IMPACT: The site contains a potentially active fault segment which could expose people or property to geologic hazards. MITIGATION: A limited building setback of twenty feet is recommended by applicant's and Cty's geologic consultants. Further, the City's geologic consultant recommends that a new soil and foundation report be submitted prior to issuance of permits to address the issue of liquefaction in light of the possible significant rise in ground water levels. IMPACT: This project will result in removal of three mature y�camore trees (out of five) and all four Eucalyptus trees; therefore, only two of the nine existing specimen trees will be saved. MITIGATION: The proposed conceptual landscape plan indicates planting new tree varieties per City standards for number and size. Two Sycamore trees will be preserved. The Design Review Committee recommends preserving all five Sycamore trees which might be achieved through careful relocation of said trees (requires 1 to 2 years to safely transplant). IMPACT: The proposed project density of 13.96 du/ac is at the top of the Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac) density range. The General Plan policies state that "building intensity at the lower end of the density range would be appropriate adjacent to low and very low residential areas." The existing low density residential to the west is approximately 4-5 du/ac and the townhouses to the east is approximately 8-9 du/ac. Therefore, this project would represent a significant increase in density for the neighborhood which conflicts with the intent of the General Plan and Development Code policies. 's PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 34-03/R. J. Investments Page 7 MITIGATION: The project proposes a heavy landscape screer along the west boundary and 50' - 90' setbacks along the west and east boundaries to provide transition of density. The Design Review Committee recoiniends that the project be redesigned with a product type that reflects the neighboring single family :haracter and to provide a reduced density along the west boundary per General Plan policy for proper transition_ IMPACT: The proposed project consists of large, two-story apartment buildings that are significantly different in architectural design, scale, bulk and building height with the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, this project could create an aesthetically offensive site which is net compatible with and sensitive to the immediate environment. MITIGATION: See Design Review Committee recommendation previously discussed. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In consid=ring a Residential Development pr.;ject, the Planning Commission must make the findings listed in Exhibit "K". However, it is the recommendation of the Design Review Committee and staff that the proposed project does not meet these findings. Therefore, the findings listed in the attached Resol:ltion of Denial were supported by the following facts: 1. The proposed building design and site plan are inconsistent with the provisions, intent, and purpose of the Development Code, particularly with regard to neighborhood compatibility. 2. The proposed building design and site plan are inconsistent with the policies and intent of the General Plan, particularly with regard to proper transition of density. 3. The constructior, of ;:his project will have a significant impact in changing the number of existing trees by removing seven out of nine trees. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in the Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners withir. 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence ':as been received either for or against this project. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84-08/R. J. Investments Page 8 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the prGposed development due to inconsistencies related to the intent and provisions of the General Plan and Development Code. Respectf submitted, f� 1 � City Planner RG:DC:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Aerial Photograph Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit 'E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Elevations Exhibit "G" - Fioorplans E;_hibit "H" - Elevation - West Boundary Exhibit "I" - Existing Tree Locations Exhibit "J" - Tree Photoaraphs Exhibit "K" - 43ndatory Findings Exhibit "L" - Hcusing Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Denia. i xJ i < 2 \\ `2 D9 aClot II.00AC. U r • \^ hf4C, RESTARANT VACANT aqa (GC) 'a (CC) 3 00 COMMERCIAL �� �^ �� / , ._ — ... -w•r'1.. VACANT zc I I STORV RAGEGCI T�`- _ • •�'� ,' 1 WLTI FAYLLT:1REI$IpfNC£ IZE t AMS RES � _ .y� .• .\.i\ - -' l •u.°° _.:\ \ \\ : i. =� YGBiLf NO YE PARK `.\ Si m.E FAYO•T AESI_M� e_•_fT \ �.r�•-.w. ._n (L! - rd -� .• j._ t ® SINGLE FAMILY I M •i �� I t RES. - _ �.11 � ' i f64 e I ml I I 'jam' IE d VACANT / �'v f ram# SNGLE I d)ES K 140. eeieloelel •s E ' •` T ey I k a �e I � � pl��® e�..` .�......`_...+.a+,.•.__ ont-:.�,_�— .r. F.. , loth v� NOUH CI T Y OF ITEM: �/I�• ��=31�� RANCHO CUCr1.I0`.'GGA TITLE: 2.Ic -tte gp _ PLANNI NG DIVISION E-miur.SCALE: } /�yVt1�-•L14�i�w..- 1. .�.�.. •� I.v :.�. '^^^• .+. F 17n *fib � TY' � '�'Jt r�i�i j1' :.�� � 1 .. .. /�- !.L..: !•" G'�- � ate• �"� .0 „. 4j' Y�T C� .f A�f' �� . "•` XJ' y, f ..j,?SY _.. Tf.� .+w r.- �� �- L �r� 'per. Y ,; _�►' '�^ - ,�iy�ti,' ^ • :1 i '�. :�.>, a;a� 4 ��'�'. w1 9Y' ri •1 M l ., l I fl ..rf Ll '!t JOM14 / DATA G��E —•���� / - \ f3USTWO COfADMYiCUYS rrr JL Y r�MCAADO ORtYE r� TACF VJE OETTGMED TTO 1 •ai Y.u< LT K' FEAUIEAF DRIVE f`- z Wcn u Y r---T a+t¢ �K ,_rr_,ort,wrw �✓ V .r'is!uYa .as.nWy yTf EMTMG A-T.VU11 E I Z R" NX3R 'H CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMO\GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIMT. SCALE. W W W R w _ ujT Eat O ra ' �� V♦'� W.W. �J1) \ c1CI .jj,_ ly F Y i F�{ a♦n ; + LIT-" a..aos.a. !; I �`.�/( ♦ - . yLel II111� V I1 J I f SIX I�3 1 � Y..Y i I ; _• j r '�"'• `fir� � r, � ' � .� I' �T 3 3 3?: NORTH CITY OF ITEM- RANCHO C C-**, N,10`:GA Triu= PUM INING DI:rO-aN EXHIBIT- SCALE- •••� AE rip x�q.,... - l_l. I 4- -ft�7:d< SFCT-Yu ee I 1•- - a^ •�.! , �a ��, .�.s '1 ` ,•'A`- .. _ -"- _ @- 3 1..� sFarlom SECT'=d1 0.0 �`.-_ r..- _` . _ , .-�l.��C/r/'•./� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN'.'•ONGA TITLE:-���-��1�� PI.._,VNNI\O DIVISION EXHIMT � ---SCALE- •-- - MATERIALS .00rA co..wrw Awwu •ruc<o ♦w nu...� 1„f/� iVri, r �r^i(r-2 7C ---ry—`_=-r��-`•,K-�.-,�`�r��,�;,"�----;.c- :� �_—fir,• F� J`'���+Y = ��%'�Y � �_ " 7c RG r NORTH CITY OF 94�0% RAI CHO CUC_ANIONGA TITLE-. eLs PLANNING Mr SiON E.\1iIMT. SCALE: I Mori— ----------t L. i..e•" I AIL iJ R9w� L.I G . r y M aR r --� i 1 f 1 I i I ± ° 1 MBR 1 �i �t��rl•a� � 8 2 FIIBR 2 BA 960 SF A ^^ O� 1 �a.L�+ t b• JiL II III 10 IS �. •y d 1 CAImTR�; RCKEK O ZOO j I � ty' t •t..va1wuc. i L = JI 4 l of gR— c t _ 1 I C 3 SR 2 SA 1904 SF ..na.ca "�*"'•"'°" V V I��RTH � CITY or ITEM: �-�� RANCHO CUCANIO\GA TITLE- PLANNING DIVISION EXhIBIT- SCALE- ^� r rRv * 1 SSr �1,�' T,a St':'"•2 .1 7' � �I.'4.1M1 1�i�•I �il :u.,l'`>Mr .t• ^ t3rr �'P ��r n'{.-1 •�FI`1u Pdn•,,,.�lllll a�' :A.i.��:'��/!'�T � .:�,�'.a ' n t4 u°'TJI$J:''ytW. w UR CITY PULINNING • J PDT GEC P� `• N �� ur..r vtcv�MAP P �`+•G`ME �--ice ("'�- EAST q cO=DMRNIUYS \\( � 1_ r� 1L_ 1f RICARDO DRR!E SIMCS E iAi T 11 ' ■ F .oaa.ew � y i lk ILI FERRLEIF Owr RIYE j \ 1 71 uls+R.n"-+.Fvssme R-a FORTH CITY OF ITEM: 640-04 RANCHO CUCATMON%A TITLE: ii iuv'i�iiitiv jl'%-!Tm'X ' E4:iii3i- j.. SCALE- } I I a • I `y 1 Y ' tf .ate 1f��. '....���iY'./r Yti �..r!_`�. - �J•� 11Y� V.�- NETT.'' �"�•^..+ �t�.�-y 0�: AL • 'Y� •�j''yi i,./r•' fit- �:�.��.i.�( �{ � =.11 s yY• . -�J NORTH CITY OF n-Eai: RANCHO CUCANNIONGA n-ru- , � � PI.AtTNLNG DIVISION EXHII3[T- �"�' a \ S 1 O ri a . 1 ✓ter :+.,�l�i!7:•�ta� ac"t� r� �a�•fr� � .., x'1 {�C`w�.l, i}:ryy •Y•.. .t. 7• „r�r'i •4 _ � f ,ram •.(� ��r� r^1 •�� . y- Jl ,LL 1�- T s, 'ft : iyee i • aJ L- �r 7•' -•eI_aa's f NURTFI T' PLAINNING DIVE" } Section 17.05.030 D. Public Heaving 1. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on all Residential Development Projects. Subdivision Maps shall be heard simultaneously Upon completion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. If the Planning Commission denies the application, their decision shaU be final mess appealed to the City Council within ten (10) calendar days (sea Section 17.02.080). 2. The Planning Commission may alter the Development Plans and/or subdivision and impose such restrictions and conditions as it may deem necessary to ensure that the project will be in harmony with the intent and Purposes of this section and with the adopted plans and policies of the City and/or guidelines as an roved by the Planning Commission. E. Findings. The Planning Commisson shall make the following findings before approving a Residential Development Project. 1. The project is consistent with all applicable general and spe^_ific plans. 2. The design or improvements of the project are consistent with all applicable general and specific plans. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmeitai damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. S. The project is not likely to cause serious public- heat" problems. 6. The design of the project will not conflict n'th any easeme,�t acquired by the public at large, now of record, for arc..ss through or use ..f the property within the proposed project. 7. That this project x2u not create adverse impacts on the environment. FORTH CITY 0""F �1: 84-a8 R-�-Vo'CI-iC) CL'C NIrJNGA -R!f P'L1NING DIN S'lO\i ErH1B1T _SG�I r- TABLE 111-8 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE, DENSITY AND HOUSING TYPE MATRIX* r � o d U an l N S Li Li"0' E 8 o -'� T GL ` <L C L � O �y1 �Gross Density m a o a a 2 cc= c ` Residential Land Units/Acre o •� D o Use Category Min Max in C v` cn in < in < it Zn -5- �N= M Very Low 0.1 2 P3 — — — P — Low 2 4 P P D4 P Low Medium 5 8 P P P D D P Medium D D _ . ........ Medium-High 15 24 P P P P P P P P High 25 30 P P P P P P P P *General illustrations of these housing types are provided in Rsareltt--i-r. -M" 1. The overall density of each development proposal must by itself fall within the applicable density range. That is. a development which falls below the minimum density cannot be offset by another development which exceeds the maximum density. 2. Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials. 3. P -permitted by'riglifi. 4.__D= permitted subject to discretionary review. CITY OF ITEM: - ®� RANCHO CUCAMO`'GA TITLE: JA6061keq r: PLANNING DIVISION EXI MAT:—�..,�_SC-%LE r, r � C e • f ` µ .0 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.'dONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than Len (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make o,:e of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaraticn will be tiled, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report ® should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: R. J. Investments Apartments APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: R. 7. Investments, 17067 Wul iX AypmiP T=JnP re 01^l ! 714/f;6O-1CQQ NAbSE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING T::IS PROJECT: Hardv Strozier, c/o Urban assist. Inc. 3151 Airway Avenue. B1dz. A-2, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714/556-9890 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 1/2 block south of Foothill on the west side of Baker. AP bL2It- 20?-�EI- 57 V5E-. 571- 19 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PEMMITS: None identified at this time. I-1 F- .z PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 126 apartment units on 9. 0 acres. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 9.0 acres. No existing structures ^^ site.. Proposed building coverage will be 66.604 so. ft. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TFrcio) , ;Q;T ALLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC Az,:�7[TS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION Oi ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : The project site is vacant and has historically been utilized for agricultural operations. There exists several foundation remnants of these past operations in the s/w corner of the site. The site slopes gently at 2F6 to the s;e. Vegetation consists of a variety of native and introduced grasses. An intermittant riparian corridor traverses _ the site from north to south several trees (Sycamore and Blue Gum T Eucalyptus) exist along this riparian edge. The project site is surrounded on three sides by residential development of mixed use and densitv. On the northern ede_ the Pacific Electric Rairoad exists with operations averaging 5 per week. A potential fault zone exists on site. enerally located 22,9 n the upper 2 S of the site. Units have been placed away from zone. An expanded biological assessment and geolosvical assessment is attached to this initial studv. The atudv identifies no sianifiranr biological communities on site. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? N0 r" I-2 F �y WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contou, s? 2. Creatr a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Creat ! a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewagk etc. ) ? X 4. Create cna.---s :.he existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 9 _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: Nine (9) existing Blue Gum Eucalyptus ard—Sycamores may be removed. Replacement Tees will ge—adentitied in the conceptual landscape plan. IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential. units, complete the form on the next page. I CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation_ to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 5/-23/05f- _e'ynature Title / G I�as� RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. : R. J. Investments - TP%128506 Specific Location of Project: 1/2 block south of Foothill on the wesr side of [faker PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 126 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 9/1/84 4. Earliest date of occupancy: 6/1/85 Model # and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range 32 1 Bdrm. $590/mo. SS 2 Bdrm. 6SO/mo. 3S 3 Bdrm. 67S/mo. F'-� 6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84-08 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BAYER, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 30th day of March, 1984, a complete application was filed by R.J. Investments for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 27th day of June, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Development Review 84-08: 1. The proposed project is in conflict with the intent and purpose of the General Plan regarding the Medium Residential land use category in terms of providing a proper transition of density. ® 2. The proposed project is inconsistent with the Absolute Policies of the Development Code regarding neighborhood compatibility. 3. The project design is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood in terms of architectural design, scale, bulk, building height and neighborhood character. SECTION 2: Development Review 84-08 is hereby denied based on inconsistency with the provisions, intent and purpose of the Development Code, which was adopted to implement the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF DUNE, 1984. PLANKING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Dennis L_ Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at. a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: AML F-a � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ovoN STAFF DEPORT s E5 Iz DATE: June 27, 1984 U > 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8583 - CARPENTER - A division of acres of land into 2 parcels in the General Industrial category (Subarea 3) located at the northeast corner of Heilman Avenue and 9th Street - APN 209-033-12 i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel i4ap. B. Purpose: To divide 4.5 acres of land into 2 parcels. C. Location: Northeast corner of Hellman and Ninth Street. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 2 acres Parcel 2 - 2.5 acres Total 47 acres E. Existing Zoning: Gererai Industrial (Subarea 3). 1 F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use: Nor t - In ustria buildirg South - Industrial building East - Industrial building West - Industrial building H. Surroundin General Plan and Development Code Designations: Nort - enera Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial I. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes approximately 2%. ITEii G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmenal Assessment and Parcel Map 8583 June 27, 1584 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: This parcel map proposes to divide 4.5 acres of land into 2 parcels in the General Industrial Area (Subarea 0; ?=:ut��i at the northeast corner of Hellman and Ninth Street. No developmz:+t is proposed at this time. Due to the water carrying nature of Hellman Avenue, a condition has been placed on the map to widen the street along its entire frontage at the Udevelopment of either one of the parcels. This will eliminate any drainage and traffic problem that woula otherwise occur i. the improvement is done in phases. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Alsi attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommenced conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully sub 'tted, LSH:S jag Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study G-/ AmIlk "FOR INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERICAL PURPOSES ONLY" SHEET I OF 1- NA TENTATIVE PARR L MIAP NO. 8583 "IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " BEING A DMSION OF A PORTION OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-"RTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-OUARTER OF SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,RANGE T WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.STATE OF CALIFORNIA. LINVILLE-SANDERSON B ASSOCIATES CmI Englnems B. LMd Surreeyo S IARROW ROUTE Llr.�wNO Gam..-r t' I I' 2 tw Lr..• Oti. 1 i 1, PARCEL 1 } W�> 41 1 ,I ,An 1 EN PARCEL 2 wlll _ 1 e ) i SI� '• yi ullut�b 'Z 1 ' �Il I j l / � w•MI Q•.w.7p Or N I r S4 I1 1 ( - . - .._n` �j',l`e {� fw✓w.n h.. o.r..N TT ..►" � u�-- I y..elr. l�h...e nf.... f I - •`oun �� L MARTIA GUN RM.' ----- -- ms-1 — I L tawLaYe- Nus.l I ;�•L I J 1 — i NINTH - STREET RESTIR DEVELOP. ?�:94lIt:SdAAa del-8 i SFiLTa7?& SPAS Im. Nardrr Aw .n V _ ICI � i ' � r III .I �I .' 111 1 _ .rl�•�-. (y iI1 7 H I � I II rr Ir ( U Ir II 1 II I � CITY OF RANCHO C(TCA(\�Q\�CA title; P.M. 8583 ' != ENGINEERING DIV-ISION •z u VICINITY MAP N pah ' 3 CITY OF R},NCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFOPUSATIGN SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to ' be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi.- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report ® should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TENTATIVE P.ARCEd, MAP N0 RSR; APPLICANT°S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: r714r oRn- 1 i__ Li.n•ille-Sanderson 9 pccnriat-c _ 9587 Arrnw Rohe . Shire .R Ranrhn Cnrmmnnaa _ C4 91710 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Gpry T Sanddersnn (711) ORn_ 1111 Linville-Sanderson R Associates 9S97 Arrow Rmire Cnire 14 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ) Northeast corner of Ninth Stre?>; ancd Hellman 411en•io 4Sse550r ' c Nn ln9_n" LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Cucamnnga Cnnnty 1$arer nistri, t Southern California cdicnn ChirO Rosin 11yiniripil wntr r nicr=yE« Southern California r:ac rnmpnnr Foothill Fire District General Telephone Company �f t PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: To divide existing lot into two parcels ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING A-ND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Lot is 4 . 5 acres , no exisring buildings DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PRWECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : This DroDerty is at the northeast corner of Ninth srrppt - na Hellnan avenue . On the north side of site is mprrnnnllron Wire ExDan-sion. On the east side h�' i l 'iin0 n the sour side is Ninth Street . On the 1•resr ci �p ; c Facc9 . DU1_Din�. The site is va am and l,ac nn arnsrpnr r, lr-y -ni 6 ; 1-6a1- ---- or scenic asaecrs _ The animal life is r:;Z ecy•r�- _,S�_ . - d si-i-5-e— of shall bird rod-n c and rpnrilp�i ndig,E."n". � M ri.Q ..1 area. The land gently S1Oilpc frnm north to cnnr', ar 'QY3w.3++ wv°v . Is the project part of a larger project, o^,e of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noist or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S. ' Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the constrL _tion of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this .initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, a.1d information presented are true and correct t-- the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evai.,aticn can be made by the Development Review Cormittee. Date 3/21 /84 Signature , Title Tice Pr sident 1-3 �_ RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the sc'aool district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developar and Tentative Tract No. : Specific Locatica of Project: PHASE I PEASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. N+.amber of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: — 4. Earliest date of occupancy- Model # and # of Tentative 5. BeC-ooms Price Range r, Z-4 i� Oil S. J w Y l RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8583 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8383) LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AND NINTH STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8583, submitted by Eleanor Carpenter and Marjorie Stroup and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Hellman and Ninth Street being a division of a portion of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of section 10, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian, County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, on May 22, 1984, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above—described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development_ 4. Teat the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial enviroemeniai damage, public health problems or have a :ErSe affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environments icpacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on June 27, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8583 is approved sub ect to the reco,:n7en� Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Aen�s L. StTt,C�i^nan r ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary 64 i, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS- CITY OF RANCPO CUCAMONGA RECOMl9ENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Northeast corner oc Aellman TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0: 8583 Avenue and Ninth Street DATE FILED: May 22, 1984 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of the South NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast GROSS ACREAGE: 4.5 1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South, Ran a ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 209-033-13 west, San Bernardino Meridian -, County o San Bernardino, California DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER/SURVEYOR Eleanor Kirst Carpenter same Marjorie Kirst Stroup Linville-Sanderson & Assoc 2020 Lyons Drive 9587 Arrow Route, Ste H La Canada, CA 91011 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the following streets: additional _eet on additional ;eet on additional feet on rv- �` x 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. -twenty-four (24) foot radius at Hellman and Ninth. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and ecress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.&R.s and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. r` -1- X 6. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer s requirements. I - X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, uaranteeing completion. of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance (refer to Condition #11 on Page 5). X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: for future undergroundino of utility services. 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage f acilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and/or prior to issuance of building permit for ® Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider m2y enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and/or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance (refer to Condition #11 on Page 5). Curb & A.C. Side-IDrivelStreet 5treet A.C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. j Walk jAppr. 1 Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other Hellman 12" X X X X X X Ninth St. J X X X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter -2- X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an eicroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer snall coordinate, and whore necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. Existing lines of 12KV cr iess fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs. striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California cdison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be madrz for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff 6radiin �( 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted I,t the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shai' be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of th( final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Buildina and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District —)7- Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga Cnunty Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans/San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from tyem. -4- C�i3 ---=— 7• The filing of the tentative map or approval of the time buildthat o sewer treatment capacity will be same does not guarantee are requested, a Cucs are requested. Wizen building per at asked to certifythe Cavaila `bil County Watet 9 Permits not be issued unless sand certification Cc acete�vor;ct will be Y. Permits will ---- 8• Local and Masterd �n writing. with the T Planned Trails shall be pr"vided in rail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing in accordance with Cit g widths, and approved Y trail standards, shallnbewsubeed submitted to' for by the City Planner prior to srecordation prior to building permit 9. Prior orin o recording, a deposit shall be under covering the Assessment District cost of Posted with the City apportioning the 1 among the newly created-parcels, —`— 1D' At the time of final Parcels. submitted: Title map submittal, the followon copses of recorded m sport, Traverse calculationsg shall be Showingaps and deeds used as rEfe s (snpets), refereced.- al land division, tie notes and bench marks �_ T1. Improvement of entire frontage Hellman Avenue shall be rc•nstructed alo of Vie 9 of the nap at the time of development of ng the the time of devela mostruction of Ninth Street shall b either 1® P nt of Parcel 2, e done at X 12. Existing P.C.C. street shall be Pavement rem ved and lilan Avenue bewith Pavement beyondcenterline tof o ccnstructin the mumwester] of six inches thick. asphalt concrete towards S g the westerle cost of y half of the street shall hbe credited Cot System'- Developent Fee or other reimbursement b y. Y the } CITY X RANCNJ CUCAMaXr LLOYD B. NflBBS, CITY ENGINEER is -5- G-� V — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ctICAJ%701 ® STAFF REPORT �/ ; DATE: June 27, 1984 19" TO: Chairman and Mambers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12365 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - The development of 270 apartment units on ots comprising 15 acres of lard located at the southeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway - APN 1077-091-01, 02. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Subdivision Map, site plan, } elevations, and Negative Declaration. i B. Purpose: Development of 270 apartments. C. Location: Southeast corner of Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway D. Parcel Size: 15 acres E. Existing Zoning: PC 81-01 (Terra Vista) F. Existinq Land Use: Vineyard G. Project Density: 18 du/ac H. Surrounding Land Use and Zonino: North - Vineyard; PC - Terra Vista) South - Vineyard; PC C1-01 (Terra Vista) East - Vineyard; PC 81-01 (Terra Vista) West - Vineyard; PC 81-01 (Terra Vista) I. Terra Vista Corarnwrity Plan Land Use Des' nations: r oject Site - Medium High Residentia 4-24 du/ac) North - Medium High Residential (14-24 du/ac) South - Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) East - Park and School Site ® West - Medium Residential (4-14 du/ac) i yl� ITEM H if apt, 14ao5/western Properties June 27 I934 Page 2 J. Site Characteristics: A one slope, no structures or trees. percent to two percent southerly K. Applicable Regulations The Terra Vista Community Plan permits apartments on a one acre minimum site area in the Medium-High Residential designation. II. ANALYSIS: A. General : This project consists of 270 apartment units with four different building types consisting of 136 units in a "stacked" 8-plex arrangement with two bedroom floor plans; I34 units are "townhouse" st four yle with two and three bedroom floor unit an project plans arhas gebeer n designed with d as ix variety ofunit �ldin setbgs. The acks and confor.,.s with t.c Community Plan text. The major project entrance will be from Spruce Avenue with secondary entries from Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. Terra Vista Parkway will be constructed to Church Street to provide secondary access to the project from Haven Avenue (Exhibit "Lls). B- Design Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval subject tnr, full— o g evisions. o Construct adjacent trail concurrently with the project, inr.luding landscaping and irrigation. o The recreation area indicated on Lot 7 should be installed during Phase one construction. o Thick-butt architectural style Composition shingles should be used. In addition, the applicant has revised the site plans per Committee recommendations to provide additional usable open space areas and to link the project together with surrounding open space areas. TheLe changes are reflected in the attached exhibits and recommended Conditions of Approval. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study, as comp coed by the applicant i , Upon completion of s attached for your review. Based Part II of the Initial Study, staff has found that no signif7cant adverse impacts not addressed in the Environmental Impact Report will occur. F`: ..vu..a,a,a.v • .a n. . na_runl Tentative Tract 12365/Western Properties June 27, 1984 Page 3 III . FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Terra Vista Planned Community Plan and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design and subdivisions, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with the Develupme..t Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This °tem has been advertised for public hearing In The Dai :_Y Report. The project site is located in the heart of Terra Vista, therefore, there were no property owners to notify within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider a i material and Elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and Conditions of Approval, adoption of t.,e attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration w^uld be appropriate. Respe¢>fulTy bmitted, Ri k o. e C- y la er G:DC:jr ttachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Area Development Plan Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization/Natural Features Exhibit "D" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "-c" - Site Plan Exhibit "F" Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Grading Plan Exhibit "H" - Elevations - Townhouse Style Exhibit "1" - Elevations - Stacked Apartments Exhibit "J" - Elevations - Carports Exhibit "K" - Spruce Avenue Streetscaoe Exhibit "L" - Drainage Master Plan Initial Study, Part I Resolution. of Approval with Conditions i 'T" MAJOR GREENWAY L SYSTEM ••••• MAJOR TRAILS \� SCHOOLS Scale 5 o Iwo 15i500 v '. _ I KC l M IN i m y. I _ '. M PA «� ; � M Lit M �j !dC L11 e i MH `> ` Lm MH E SE e Al • v M LM .' Tea �' M �� • m l pP. LM op RC cc OP \. �. OP p� 1 NORTH CITY C�l` a ��I• � f l.��Q� �' RANCH PIANNI.NG DIVUQN-T E?CNI}7I- � ►w� SCALE- BASELINE - -_- - - - BGAD = _.—LI^ .�_� � � 7EtiTAT1Y£TRAG �� lam• I ��. - , • �1�z'� � Yam. /��' _- �. --^-�, '.�.�- �'v—� '' I L!�'_—_ _-_ > G, �' 34. -, 1✓�= -tiraA�� I l — - - 11 ,1, ` `�,1v-•-- - _ L ASN • I / 1FR lip CITY ©F I AINCHO CUCATMONGA -nTLE: Ama4 PLANNING DIVISION £.XHIr2T:— SCAU..= Tow" — J Y SITE UTILIZATION AND NATURAL FEATURES misp TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12565 IN TMLC:T"F-RANCHO CU_AMONGA COUNTY FO iAN ■ERNARDINO ST TC OF CAtIFORNIA '/ '!V/r/. IA:Y LNE IIOdD�//// ••••v•_Y+•Y,V OC703YR•, 2927ti - •}�•. 1r � I' ` ll✓✓_ C ham. ® 1 wtouNT.iv %I W / i ` I S �/ I.W MIS• '�..I�IO / L\'OizrH 't CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1y10.NGA - rn E= 4 PI.Ai�`I\G DIVUONT EXHIBT--�_SCALE TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12565 AM IR TMC CITY OF MAMCMO CDCAMONGA LODMTY OF SAM RERYARD7M0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ISA ACK, !LOT! 270 UMI!S OCTOSEE I!•S I.— TERRA VIlTA OARRWAY � `` ��r'e+ r- ao..n a...e.s.-' j.. � .��•�.�� !.a.:. '�s / �..��.. .. 2 pa.J -- „ yLOT 8 ton —A SfRDC AVEMOE I�M�� ��♦ MODTTAOI VIM Dwrt `��OR - CITY of nT-N1: �►r RANCHO�o CUC-INT IO GA Trr.F:COI 'fa i PL.AINNI UNG DIVISi(._NT EXHIBIT- SC-',LLE) amf '+ �;. �� � SiJ Qt ��� ,�''.!•�-. r,.� c lam^1,., : _' vol PAPK 1 s`.,�J i ES Y,✓ �li�;�� Y.'�^.+..I".^i>,..y_,�.y^'li' , LOTIN --{{ ,✓"ti• l�l j I•.1.t-71 11 LOT 8 A —�_YOlal7ap —� V \j NORTH � CITY ®F � RAl\CI�C) CL'CAi��I�t�,A PLXI\Ti TING DI`''ISION EXHIBIT. /'D i9.0iY1a�» � 9F�it'dlJTai iYt>LOC — -•--���•��� - MLLmMCJ ;Y > _! tJ� f>ll.�> \TIO.. WWCJ saR l� r � f w i • \ in to - LLLrrr > �\ \ � "ice �' " •;,yµ, cM-- —'�� r.u�—Y —. ( ��.-.`{ •tip, sa —J :f� ..+^. � ;�,,;.�: ; '."".�I I pis-' ZT- VAIK ot r uv - Sim__ l f c� rGr'•K� b_ .� .} - ,.., 1 � '�i.-•4/. �yi'�,� • r_ _� Imo•_ .::, _ _: � r:n� v- \Irk . , . ;1 _ ^_-• i .r ;!i.� 1 �''c �7 'M1 \'� 1.,yq 1_J y� � mow• �\ -� '� a- 1 rue, I J T� __- •- r.- - ' ''� I r ''� �'�••', . �[ �N}}•� _ .\' rti r �S I �, � I-�.1�fi. - _*I � � f.�• mat=' � ��: .i�S . i ) —i � 'I -,ter - � , '°;i ��\r•' b •` �j� rr 4,� _ y ` lOJI .nr LMTP NORTH H CITY O 1TG\1: RANCHO CUCAxIO\'GA Tm_E: PLANNING DYN'LSiON £tH€fi►T: _SCAU-_ •- w s: 'Q�+� i FRONT I'EVAnON SIX;UNIT BUfiDING 77 ..� �:.. .; .,-1...`�-yam.-^•• ` � �x21 ,4 r SIPE ELEVATION &MLAR ALL B=ING,, "- tiY/y'�f\� ir^ REAR ELEVATION pt;y t "It -Cr. _ t 7. I lit REAR S-EVATION FRONT ELEVATION FOM iABT BJLLDNG mem hvw.nisvo �onw gem+or NORTH L t NC14-0 C�T�la i1 �Csr� TCI ,,E PUVNNI\G DIN'M.N E`Ct- IMT. SCALE. •�� �• F SME ELEVATION i • 1 �_ I _ jj it FRONT ELEVATION exxW�"Temw �ML6 'L•fOnlit lAG - KYw wpm Ttl� SIDE ELEVATION All t t` x x t j MONT ELEVATION NORTH CITY OF IMM-RAN( CL'CA�10\'G� TrrLE: Pl �� ' • '--'.i>< DIVM\T EXHIBIT= _ALE, c _ 441 'CF Is t`/ v ' -1 O I r, is 1 o LE � c5 �1 t ' � I�� r i;�'- IY•�,y erg (J _0 Lz CITY OF aAi\'CHO CLT1Z10NCTA T, :� s � ►g� PLANNING DIVL�ION E.XIiiBrr.'LT — SCALE- •'••. �•f — 1 II i rA \` r �--'y= 7y}j w>,. ". tom ' `�' ♦ '% _`IC`- � .I -.I++-tea• l-+ a ✓}+�. i } `',.fit .fy� � 2 `X A CITY or, ITEM. RAI\TCHQ CUCATMONGA -,I-rLE: YLA1�I1tI\G DIi'ISIQV EX'HIBM. _SCALE: 4 i LI II—� � SFsfi LgaE k� M ' t. u m LM ✓ MQ �- I MH t iLM �\ O FL`^v.?CC✓^.OLY i ■� /�4/Zycf'.•O l2fif ` TPACT / 66- \c. m � [/4�c M OP LM \ \ OF E H SOP H J P ! �) pc OP �* --—J OP > i a �! TBLVD `JILIL 11ot; tine C:YTY OF RANCHO CUCA:1iONGA I a r FNGINEERING DIVISION 7_T �2365 --'Tm I3nAit�TAGE MAP page _�� CITY OF RANCFO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STI:DY tC t f pAR7• I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Cor,-,,Iittee thro-ugh the department where the project application is made. LTpon receipt of this application, the Environrier_tal Analysis staff will �,renare Part II of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, Y) The pro;--ct will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or :) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project_ PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract No. 12365 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE western Promerties 115G N. Mountain Avenue, P. O. Box 670, Upland, CA 917S6 'S14/98 -0 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CCNTACTED CONCEPUNING THIS PROJECT: Richard Lewis, address and phone given above I10CATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) APN 1077--091-01 and -02 , 10716 Base Line Road Prciect located at SE corner Spruce Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PER.*SITS: CCWD (sewer and water) Foothill Fire Protection Drol istrict, San p 'Bernardino Uoun y JV11> u1VJ+V,• anc, — (dust azatement - this pe-mit already issued) PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: _A 270-unit condominium project consistirc of eight lets, two of which are common recreation lots for t2ic project' ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF 7XISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 15.0 acres Existing buildings: None Proposed buildings: 252,365 sq. ft. DESCRIBE THE £NVIRONNN NTAL SETTING O"r TIM PROJECT SITE INCLUDING Jlv"rCR1�T7.ON ON TOPOGRAPiiY, PL_AY"ES (TREESI , ANIXALS, A>Y CULTURAL, FISTORICAL" OR SCENIC ASPECTS, LToE OF SUPROMLMING PROPERTIES , AND THE DESCRIPTION OF AIRY £XISTI_c G S"iRUCTURES AND TH MIR USE W_` CH VECE.SSARY S?i'ETSl north to scut::" Plants: The si`a has scattered grapevincs, no treNs_ -- surrouneMrg en use: V_neya- in al erections. Fxis:inq land u.e: Vineyard. �xi :ing structures: None. Animals, cultural, historical, scenic: Not applicable oer Terra Vista Cormimity Plan EIR. Is the project, part or a 'arger project, one of a series " of cumuiacive actions, "rich altnough individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. This project is a portion of the Terra Vista Planned CoLmunity or wnictt an i.. nas � re n _ie ii\ WILL THIS FROJECT: YES 2� x 1. Create a substantial change in g ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc_ ) '. x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove anv existing trees? How many? X b_ Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fiarmmables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page_ C£RTIFIC?,TIOti: I hereby certify that the statements furnished ' above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best o! my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand t1a t additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Lewis Development Co. an Western operties Co- Date auoust 12 . 19a3 Signature :z., /; _ _1 Title Autr.orized Agent ir3 • � '�� RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION r { The folloioing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential developmen4t. western properties Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. : Tentative Tract No. 12365 SpeCi£ice Location of Project: SE corner Spruce Avenue & Terra Vista Parkway PEASE I PIir.SE 2 PHASE 3 PRASE 4 TCrI;j, 1 . Number of single family units: o 3. Number of multiple family units: 270 _ 34DUate proposed to it/a3 begin. constr::ction: ;. Earliest date of 4/84 occupancy: "del and z of Tentative S. Bedroo-is Price Rance A - 2 ER All rents affordaLle per County bond issue standards. B - 2 BR C - 2 BR D - 3 BR T- 4 _ .a Y. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12365 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12365, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Western Properties, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision, for a total development of 120 apartments on 15 acres into 8 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on June 27, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Conmission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: ® SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12365 and the Map thereof: (a) the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at iarge, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12365, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Open fencing, such as wrought iron or tubular steel, shall be provided between buildings adjacent to the park site. A self-latching gate shall be provided as a connection to the trail . 2. Applicant shall contact the school district regarding the proper design and location of access to the school site. 3. Provide storage units thro-ghout the project to the satisfaction of the Citv Planner. Details shall be included in the construction plans. 4. Provide a 3-foot to 4-foot high retaining wall and densely landscaped berm to screen parking areas from public streets. 5. Lattice work or similar screening shall be provided on the end of the carports nearest public streets. 6. Cetails for carports shall be included in the construction plans for review and approval by the City Planner. 7. All trash enclosures shall be provided with a lattice overhead or similar shade structure to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 8. Whenever the regulations of the Terra Vista Community Plan differ from the standard conditions, the Community Plan regulations shall supersede those of the standard conditions. 9. Two (2) enclosed tot lot facilities with play equipment shall be provided. Details and locations shall be included in the final landscape plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Resolution No. Page 3 10. Construct adjacent trail concurrently oith the project, including landscaping and irrigation. 11. The recreation area indicated on Lot 7 shall be installed during Phase I construction. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. The applicant shall be required to construct a secondary access road of a minimum 26-foct wide R.C. Pavement within 40 feet of dedicated right-of-way from Spruce Street to Haven Avenue at Chu -ch Street, including a bridge across Deer Creek, as shown on the drainage map, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The cost of the bridge shall be credited towards the system development fee for Terra Vista development. 2. All drive approaches are to be constructed to City Standard No. 306. 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form and/or join landscape and and lighting districts, or other maintenance entity acceptable to the City Engineer, shall be filed with the City Council . The engineering costs involved in the formation of the district or other vehicle shall be borne by the developer. This shall include maintenance of perimeter landscape parkways and trails. 4. The applicant shall be required to construct a portion of the master planned storm drain along Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive, as shown on the drainage map. 5, Concurrent with the required parkland dedication for Tract 12365, the developer shall dedicate any road frontage contiguous to the proposed park site, per the Park Implementation Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF JUNE, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary p`/ Resolution No. Page 4 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMiMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS- ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f ., O�Gr • C� OC "u rLN V U^J9 ^ d ` j` OyP •_ � N—,L u? 1., _— O 9• 'V .Ln O V G n 4✓S w " �� �[Y�o d�a u ^ �l cC OV 9r6 r.j n;.°o r -✓ YL �o.cm c'o o. -__ Nc_ n � ^ N �N Dq•L. �.•.� - _. L P P 1 ��•" V q•>✓ VC 000✓ C = 6 ✓Dy HpG Q _PC 6(' r V o O O^` = G c F M { N S V O ✓_a G 9 > 'w L •' O J _O�q q V V N V� ` Y rl•O-. U ✓^ G C '"J C � ✓'J y U d✓ G J V i 9 V^ 00✓ _ _ •� U rj C J V r _ j i� 0 C � L <r� p y _ ^_ ON G W Z d 6 J � Q V ^l r✓ J u L ru G g fEi yr= = V O d! N r i. OY > re V 9 q ^` NV ✓ O✓ NLi gN•U'r 9pi `c SL= Npr yr_gw " q.".e c�•.a ar ..� a� ^ d O O ✓�.� N O q rn Z LO i q y 0� u G r r 0 . U� w D 4� 9 _ ✓_N _ N T d r D w 6L� p w 9 CCgd r Nd � A_ uq ✓9 yr ^ Or" E^ C19 • i0� L�LCr ^^ P✓ rnV yru r nd> LS d�.Lir GTG= vQnq PeN Noy � O nP✓O ✓ v �.< _ q2c � 6Or9 O'C Tw O9N J^ n O N O. Opp f. V L L O ✓� _O 6 P✓ G �✓ V r �✓.^ �• r Or C�7 l L•�w N •L .dr 6Z �' ro y� 0 L C y'• w �_ O.e 9 C �' 9 Z N G C✓ r 4 O Q C p U L U ^ d S V wFr .�_O �� > LO L✓ d l ` rEe'—r CTG^ OZ OCV y J Cq.oD^ '•' coE tl �Yv�it v� _ '^= E '�c> Pc sty ip Vi —Li c r Ley r n600w ON d6 r OD Zw LS C 0p<00 V, >VO GFa Z 9 `_d VyGOr - d ^ 'LrrO LpN V _ q d V r C E q>✓! t Y 9 u 6 U C 7_ a J Y d C^�. .^i.L G N Ny-JyN y �� OCV 9yyP06 lC_T _^ � Vy_ ^ raOc 9y 9=9 > d d L O L > 6 M� OV 6M 6Ogm 6YD <qO.t � 6 �6V L a 6 6 D'��O H6N O Tpy �y a2 =jam p W — OrY D'YZ V Z 00 � uL Cy v 3 Z d YJL jU C, pq N� yq � dG V �•V-. V qy O i V GC"' p T t C u 6 d a O✓W ~' l9 ^NA N V q V •O N V O r GY C G u G✓ N i C :;z vc E' adi PD S se F r y C P � K • N np q L q F d a U .n � � { .`e a ✓ p `� d c r � d cc Ey�� EGN o .c Z �� dGJ UO� _�� r �u A G N D• G D Z G w Cp q L •p• Y K` ` � C O •ram pFC^ Y x d y`O L Vq 9✓ F✓ Cq� O•"r NL g ^Z V y d 6 C Gp Q£ E C p V q O F L V C Y G d N O 6 •r• O t0J C V F V G V �6 y p O OI r O tY V� HMV\ yr � .Ce.q� `�7i06 DO NC--. CNCV � O Nq0^VO POq ry r .mac•. a n� 6 1 pV •r�>' y0 ✓ V COO l0 > dV tL qw.^ VL6 � O�y E n w d 9 F 2 l V O i. � e• N. .d..�`Jic T EE» Yo V >s� nc? Lr = `q� q'^' vygc E .a. �� ` � q L •—••' �^ice c= q dJ•i Yd1�o i ye�ao',J, p" Po.-" c e.� L q2 d � r 9 C U D I U 'J t D � O u u^ .J O 1` C C — J d >•— q N 2 COC` G'r..+— OC Vr^_ JV Vr C Lq VCN r_ c qin C O U wC0 l 'r_r ` G Ni Cn yrL`r.iS�1S NrG Nq �uV E 9d2. q. = d cL .rdQ V LJ.OiT CJ qw qC7 C c r ' uc n c�i Li• .E. - gEor.�L„ _ 2 Y^ _ � o c c e y'— '° q F N E O���L 6 V -"4+^n G d r N CV-r O L r n O O V 4 � n•• —C n_ a ic.` - c.T. °"' m� ¢c•j7v. `y Loq i,oy v a� w q H� r C L. � pL n ^i C V•O T N ^o �D p_ D E JCL r O L C d ' d Y 9 r C w. V� n r q�. �r y O. V•N S.� Y L O d 9 J Cq NV VN LL.L..r.Or^ qq LJ -9C Ei O�Wr^N-..iii V� q C 4J� NI V aL �^ a i N\v6V5C pC— Off• Qd n y06r�.N ��.y„ ..•0= Oi .. S rqL �`N O I�UCN Q•rOq . Tl . � GO C )y Jj yC .Li d .0 — OV NP`� O� •'�r� C'DbC > `` O COJ C S py G d A d C r C w r 9 r b V r b^r r G c 9O— _ lN C dq — >^TJC " O�rcej �rN OJr dy-JM^r` N r0 G � .On C c < E.L+p �L 6 0 l p 6 S- i .Ji.q»L.O✓� i�V T G 0 2 .rJ.i e G H�w i L �-_b •e � ri p c 0 <•r > G C b� C O G D u. y_ O O T d L V C O O N V O O •n q q J Q O q C O n n N 2 d 9t— n N1 y " s nr C L EVl to Cr L VNV�. V JV ?N Pp o St c W W t u i —c C E l C— O N 0d2 C P�P dz �_i �y �� r.L.'�eM V r`�'�a o �^a a •O .' � w �i LjaOs 9L SW _ Vq0 V GPC Q A� O d 6 r "ty tea... VA .N..- •i-y ��D ^ qc ....N c " Gq c a b nd � 0.2 q _ qC u2CCN qOd ALE w•^ C6 C� TU N VCN _ dyC Cdr 9C VVC Nnyr� .L.. -Z Z 9 >V A C n N .G O V —d 79 i O ^ r G E CNy Qq z0� 0 q0 �L L J GF p-j qOY V c.2 WO 9qN= .Li.y � V6 O rq Mp pr VV.. 0 _TdQ >..rC o` VV^ cCO nyc gcLV OCD ._S C d0 Ep� 9 •O C`� P C O.• w ..G�j .Nn O O�J i C ? P C p C' ^ C L p a J?y .^ TLUN uON .ram V�O— r d �r CVOd = r ON q V c Orq ` ma cy E' dyia—G ncW - J C»r o d 1OV a.r CGa ^^ J�rL O�y iY- dN nv y.n VrLr� �' —» J mo F •Jr.p N C� O Q TI CL Pd (� ^ L COLT C^ Nr VTV Ndr� Lr • r 7 a p V O �/•�� ` T�� y 0 L ��_ � nVa — V �•+ ALA O PI O Jr ^ T � � A .•—V G L L N O L r .�. •� d O e' L O L �' S N > d VI o c ri L cL T�_ c_ om ipPP ci� L _ � nv wn �A n C A r • Q q V V_^N q_ `u— N l 9 V L PVc •` —= _4 Gp T NTP 9C C�. GC dON� l^ CO �9 ?r� YV > �^^SO DNA M� • l �iC � 6r � P r ✓ .coio o N . aic � qnN Go.w c � anu o nn... Rio No c LNd•Oi .e f- N �— OT— —C VCV ` GVE OC.L.• A >. Pr rC 272 Ln y ` l A O d G d d Pr O O T C rLC q.r CL CL nAG dC^ P _n —�L A6 MT�A p=N FO 14 C O=.' C 9 G ^ T N^ A•Li P 'f A'J L P r. C C r V � T V C" C N D Cp L ggCL ` CL gyfc NEd � ,eOy.7 O AO �E Eo SUP "mac cAn ANUA— _ c q�- c_ c_��—�' LPP Lc _� �J Vq —_ C V O dO Cd •+9 � CP— do GN 7q— LC 6 q� 06 QV �-a.p• ti rlV� NNq 7. N� •/ l6C � 4� A— Qnp OV N M •..P V P ^ OC PO OG AyQ a0•oO afl CO do SUPi —rE 4^ � —c ams o •� M vvo�a ens .;.n� G>C Cd • C -OL gVOVL qd� ` r •+ V •/N A L 6 V G m i G r L .L.. O •^ � 6 a G m S LOi y 6r C � C — • V O r_L Gr G� O MT~AE + dOV tN O dCON�f ryi 9 pO rr�. OCr ErO✓ PV dNG � rO n •C NV 9 V l V a y A Q 7` C C 4y'.L•L O V b L V C V L qV > �� �Vn w Cdl � N V•.. rP.. � O � A O� L LVnq J•+ C =N '• 00�� =` L_ i10 � P Aq q P qr N = >`00 N ^rCcy Cu LEp OL• C r O_ P< N � •Li..Ni.Sv a�� O00 CV— T PL Od CV� Cq _ d ^ '^_ N•' gc .ce '^ L{ •� c �u.L.Ac+eo }r L A F C 6 6 6 N > O C N L 6�L V r U C ^ n N P 6 Ems. 9 .L..� � : L .+�—O f y G 9.. o y•' n C P ` i O a.o o e q C.'O l T� V:✓ L P � b CL�NUV^ C � OyN Y �•.. C? z— _NY G •� C .nON LOV LTV— l6jC_T^fir nC� O •NnAfO"� pta V� V O N N V NL S d p O r fn N N q r` V O E V G, Q• p V`O �L�— _PP iC trO Li�=5 V ^ P ONO = T L q C F O V V • > L r V M C � T_'• C N V L N N L6 n Ub Vw VLN drO � NP•' 6wVU GA ` YOB CG NOLLLL q C L ^ 6 V l A O V W M r n r C N% N NZ P—r ( A rJ Q nO b OTN— Q KL QN TV�bd C1 �! �I 4f � �y Ni � �� ~i � . • q � r >� > V l G C •C O O V_ W _ = i D N_ AdIlL • ��rNW YQ V �r `c i > 9 M A C V 4�• L C 7 qJ•.r•"' p 9� V - q yC� a q0 LAG Z. d C7 EOq W � pW y0 ha d r ^__O a\. ry q V LJ Lp C ~ D3 AN AZ y0 L9 V_ c D gc ea o .o .c.i N5 pTH nV ^J:: Vw'a.i a ^ u ' ry jV rE dE TN .Oevvi cu oop Oq N_TG =OL` dV .) aA E� � d QCJ LIPq� dt d0� D �r4 O' � r L C 6r" gY qa 7Cr Odd^ d J ^ d r' V' '13✓ r'O dq ' T�3W� 9 P� � i � O Lam• plp1 GJ c� 0 0� •� d O N • P pair V 9� �, q d O q A O� ._.� O•-. C N L. y A W q d N a V� C C O m N �_ p ^ C J > `NW � � Ei cl d �C � C Cr ODO pE VLNd �� augA �9A O lN^ l d OlC rC^ w • qN � J� ep r •O ��^ N ' g7dv ddq V r Od.•. •N� C `E N '�J 7 +Ci q� 9•L.•Md P�V L� Ca 6O ca W..+ p.•L. gIO N � 6da WMr WV4Oj 'JC6 fo Ci6iQr YPV GiOJ� O N � Y Q r r A C C r d r q C A V O O r r N N •O.. � ql M ���� �� -18 V y Vq Zu LTA d WV 0 V o c c.`.^ t' �SLc '^ m •dam E 'co V A `O '�dq � yrr t.VrOf jV 0 > d °' (' � o c r•'o a p L tN N QpQj� O N ONVF O^ V r• > WV �.r..�CO, d _ CC'�.. A � O TCgp A64d L ' '• O�r q VO O ^ C�.•. V N aq 9NW `r p= qQ Y a V NTd d� 6 q N d g C y C 6 J C •.'L 2 I E T I p c O i U w J _ N V c J C I N O v O 9 N °d ird d � I EV 2^ VA _ � NN9 NI •' ``� �d o= =^n .T. rr e � m � Mwge rEdL 'ji 0 L 4N NNiO C V� wOFTi ..`�'V C=� d O O W L C V.di d_V 2 T O C 9` agi r V N O C C a. q O y � O » C^ Ce0 wyA� 0.�. Or � � • • _ ` a l0 C7 `MMMI V OCO N py PEJW 1d0� AO `pd4 � 60 V0 VpOVr = y ± S 36 a O Cu —eV �•<S a6 TOG C � ;L O c�I t' Y Ci � 4 L' O Ems' V 4ri. —, VO `�, q C War WE2 6dJV Hq �6' 0� 6 � � I3lW�16 �� O r4�wL L V NI dI r.. ✓ NOG v ` CO Z V I L .�'•` q o 4 r V • � a � � O 1 I .•--p d71`���Vy - L �dn o` � = c c� o c u 1 Lr� CCTa =r✓ 00 = 0 Y ylV Cw. ¢lJ r ^ n 3 O V� r d � 6 ✓ C Oau 4 V � N J Py� _ [ o✓ � Lu tea. .- no` c- nc G I `di 1 xl�i ��� C CC -/ O l.' VA � C • � I V =�� '. - Sa cA.`.y Nr ca v ✓ > oo - u o ¢_ �I XI xi Gl a•a � 72 =I w N L L ^ a b_ A N Pam ti A Q� � NNc N�LJJ��V�•1y1y�1' ,a ` � V b O C R A a �9 i �� •fir L.•I O •T• 9 rT A 'V 2 n� u V= r� d NO NI ✓ dV Q T ram• tl6' i 9 V•�� O C••` � .`i„ .A. V dN vl LJN 7 Cp• VrI J � I /\ � C LO� O•�'- l— 79n A bi^ t' V F- rP Y_ C✓ — VV •- v AyVF cCi � �v _- OS ` a s c-�ovu 1"Lcn cE I 6sN1 ¢.O. nin QV� C•La 6o'y ui O iJOAN¢ 6i t0+— � ' I � I � a.• � w v C O 2 r b✓ U r . V•` V C CO C C i N • b �( � ]l ✓ C •• _ O r A_ P� �O✓ � � N � R a � C E i r e r =✓ L✓ d o ✓ O O=C L4 m r u A ✓ >.rn cv^i — b 6 .O+V N L o C � n � N c L c •Nr• =OV q y O V 4 Cb`. V V y O c'O a E T a i 4 PVSO yd 2_ �1C ✓'O _O•o� n0 l> S � � = A � C a�• d PL C �yq Q9 EO_ =V�`V o N9 O ' N N i L cam- N "_ ✓ A ✓ ' oa i r •� i .>. c Var 'a � COdy N_Oc y•✓aE c_ V �ry ✓ � v r Q ✓ q�L `�C T.O.y IY �QC VA t �� /• N n l �— P 2 PCAO p� C OdOVU VLO N -cLc• nN ` OOO CLO L s Vb74 �•`a t_q 6�a ��On EA b �d� •Or.� S � C .r.• V Mqw CU`� L V=n L �:✓ '• Cr ✓ _ CL ` C `� ` l r_ Fnr O_ dNE OG u`iYd ^ y.d cC•C 2N — ✓ 22.2 r 2 rCC >v f. Vv >� N 4 O -V' p�r ON ninon "C1.... wOPE4q VV O CTC OT p ` C �' Oy rn N T UMC O C a• E •C yt.N ` A � 6r it .0.. r��C �� � LCV ',cei N• Es n L N r- O 'a� VIE ACCVT CCE CLa_C �-� c <� �C r C� �O Nr�O 'rCVC .`C. OV VPP GO✓ �uV ^� A Nr OC b ` n A C� � ` ^ > _O 7 N N n✓� L �� � V � C A O.N uV9 > ON ^Ac N FC� I.`. t'• I VG P NV C9 A� CLN d 7 rOO� b � i. AY O L IVOaa < OV VO PA C• VT VO 1 >r_ d— A oO 6 •v C V 9 YI �! � O O O.Or 1 �N V u• T{I •� \I '- V Lv I voc .-•L. rq i qa`v y � a cq :::Y-;-.. . O .,u •ru.. I o.�v =r e � L N v— c o � a'a �.., i LT Ny� uG >o I n V L j o —J ^ •"f � rl E O O I dV IE V U « d J •�_ O q T` l un � � q _ _ a c .^.a.. c mad➢ � T o P '..'' • .rL v ya O � � ` V+ O CIO nlN .cu 77S COI Od V + Sd n9 � G =VV W L u—_ P LL ✓ A/l'' q L �.9 • _ V E . O d q � d O= 9`Q �� r 0 S I a d_ V V � TU f•V..� J � L O u Y r r I Q r y n•' — G d J Qr N 0 q 0 rc _ V V� PLu Odr •ri.t y� 11µ`C✓ NCO `N `yam � dV6LN s y •� � o E •ce oa` N_ � � ry n v ran aN� �• L DQN u0✓ x d Ylr_ _ S u„" y G61 L ` q >N d _ « O t 6!„� u O L O— • �{uC �J W 6' � O r� N O V 0� M s•- T a a � � 6� nPJn nPl Ero. o" �V 00 9 GV NO Cu VV PW O.-. y CO6 VN �V �uu N «d L t C r �1+uE y C 0 � — n` �q u °1 G \• d l 9 U� � �r y g C l r d O r y � OC+ �� Q4.Ti AV9 PTOy KP ayq VT .�` PN Y CN ^ I P 60L4 -•`IV Vy '.Gei w'V—OT .Nd 'LVC —n uu TgLUL a �V C c•ca= nN v`.. v ` 72 ` No ra o `• c o 4� aadd V a `N'om uc i—' c« .r ra i `o Ed e= `r: d fir.. a O1 V Qu nN V+ 2 — Ve .• �u QnC S10NV dTN qy O. t V q C C' l ` — N L ,C q 0 q� L t �N IO l—W rlCGy 'a n� ya Jr « C yN� ly u_V C VO� C + yH W G G 7Z q <u r+ LCGO «a•q y+� `V� ON NT r a N Y C./ NOuO NNy 6�� QU 6� Wr Mtt d GO V 36 Vv N 0 y V O .r, O L G. — y > C r V n V O�.ui V P ` L T d 4 E A p 6 9•w I r 9W `tJ r d— I 1 VV u� a m d E orn c 4 I �o.oi P c u v q q p ^ n q PT c c N O I N l 9 N r � • L ..c• q T~ T ovCa wcw �•J 9 O C—N 9�M � 4 p 6 p r C � 16 J 1.OJ a `' p CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gvcanra"v STAFF REPORT < n z� 1 , 44' r .. i, y ;V Fj Z U`- > DATE: June 27, 1984 197 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-21 - AJA - e deve opmert of three one and two story industrial park/office suites on 4.09 acres in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6), located on the west side of Haven Avenue between 6th & 7th Streets - APN 209- 262-171 18, 19 and 20. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of the industrial project described above. B. Purpose: Te create three industrial park/office suites. C. Location: West side of Haven Avenue, between 6th & 7th trek ets. D. Parcel Size: 4.09 acres E. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 6) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant Parcel G. Surroundin ner land Use and Zoning. Nort - a n ustrta ; zoned Industrial Park South - Vacant parcel; zoned Industrial Park East - Vacant parcel ; zoned Industrial Park West - Warehouse/distribution; zoned Industrial Park H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - In ustria Park (Subarea 6) North - Industrial Park (Subarea 6) South - Industrial Park (Subarea 6) East - Industrial Park (Subarea 6) West - Industrial Park (Subarea 6) ITEM I PLANNING :OMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Revoew 84-21/Aja Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of two vacant parcels which slope gently at a two percent grade in a north/south direction. Currently, the site contains a variety of ind;genous field grasses and native plant materials. In addition, no structures are located on the site and street improvements including curb and gutter are existing. II. ANALYSIS: A. General- The proposed office park complex is designed to m accomo ate Office/Professional uses and ancillary support commercial/retail uses (Exhibit A) . Typically, the complex will consist of three structures composed of single and two- story units. The structures will consist of smooth texturized plaster elevations with a ribbed metal roof. Entrance canopies and frames are also provided to enhance the appearances of the structures. Access to the project will be provided via Haven Avenue and 6th Street. Please note that this project was originally parceled into four lots when the SDC project, located directly to the west (Exhibit "E"), went before the Planning Commission on November 9, 1983. As you may recall, any future structures to be located along Haven Avenue were to be exceptionally well designed to screen the large SDC structures while projecting a high quality office park image. B. Backgro=,: 7ie previous submittal (Exhibit "D") was denied by t e P anning Commission due to building configurations and site designs which fostered a strip commercial image, as viewed from Haven Avenue. In the past, the Commission has voiced concern regarding the negative implications of establishing strip commercial building designs and uses within the Industrial Park category of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and has directed staff to prepare design and development guidelines which address the following topics: (a) building configurations and site design; (b) architecture; and (c) permitted uses within the Industrial Park category. In the interim, however, staff has prepared the following analysis designed to acquaint the Commission with the issues described above as they relate to the nee Aja submittal . s . PLANNING COM,v!ISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 84-•21/Aja Page 3 C. Project Analysis: Architecture: The architecture of the proposed industrial complex has been well designed by providing recesses, reveals, layering of materials, and pedestrian oriented amenities. Site Plan/Building Orientation: As illustrated on Exhibit B, the applicant has revised the site plan to project a more office park oriented development. Note that the new design mitigates previous concerns regarding strip commercial building orientations by providing two 2-story office structures (Building 2 a 3) adjacent to Haven Avenue- in addition, various entry plazas and courtyards have been provided in an effort to break the linear (commercial ) appearance of the previous submittal (Exhibit 0) while proje:tirg a more office oriented environment. Future Phases: As illustrated on Exhibit "A", Phase 2 of the Haven Plaza za complex will consist of a mirror i:iage of the Phase 1 proposal. Specific site plans and building elevations will be required for ?hale 2, which is only being approved in concept at this time. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Comnittee was generally pleased with the new Aja submittal , but recommended ti,i following design improvements: 1. Expand the entrance frame/trellis the entire length of building 1, contiguous to the east facing elevation., designed to provide added 'i visual interest. 2. Provide additional windows, or other design elements to east facing building 1 elevations, in order to provide additional building relief and visual interests. 3. Provide a "passive recreation" area south of building 3, contiguous to the property, between the proposed development and future development to the south. E. Grading Committee: Conceptual grading approval has been granted for the above-described project, subject to the Conditions of Approval found an the attached Resoluticn. V' 1. -3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 64-21/Aja Page 4 F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental imp -ts related to the construction of the project. If the Co,.. :ssion concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III . FACTS FOR FINDlNGS: The findings listed in the attached Resolution were supporte y t e following facts: o The project provides adequate setbacks, landscaping, and improvements which make it compatible with surrounding land uses. o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development and the proposed .ises are in accordance with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and General Plan. o The proposed building design and site plan, in conjunction with the Conditions of Approval., are consistent with the current development standards and architectural design policies of the industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental review in The Daily Report newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a put;ic hearing and receive all public input on this matter. Further, it is recom. ended that the Planning Conmissicn approve the project and adopt the Resolution of Approval with Condition�s. on Resp ctf, 1 ry submitted, R' k o e C ty Planner . G:FD:ns ttachnents: Exhibit "A" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "B' - Detailed Site Plan _ Exhibit °C" - Elevations Exhibit °D" - Previous Site Plan Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval 1_Ld T t SEYBRN STREET ' '7 r `¢Z LLI 0 W<J Q r U ! r'., �'•� sic CCO r -I I �z0 w< o {{ + I U !1 i r i CIL\ i r W i i � L 1 I rK)RTK - �4 CrrY OF rrcv: RAiZCIh(-; CUC.AMONGA TrrLE-�� ��� r �►„� sE i'1�„.� PLAII1NLNIG DIVLSI N EXHIBIT`- 1 SOLE- I i �.---•�- ---, - Asa II9 ; � • f a _ �I LIJ co t= ' `o to =_ Z �T 1 j Z i i � f �--�— _ NORTH CITY OF , E� RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tnu:� : -�� Fla►� PLAININLNG DIVISKIN EXHIBIT: SCALE, •�\mil i � Y�y W LLI z ------'^--- 'c le S' i� Ley g f - c c c - ���'• I 0.`C1 g r. NORTH CITY OF ITE.NI= PUNT NUNG DIVMN EXHIBIT- G SCALE- -- _ S- 'y _SEVENTHLU = u �o►� N cc CID Q w LU�U O ilk Cc V cc r Rn i r' f E C` NOXM CITY OF - RAINCHO CUCAY MIX ITL�I: PL U NNING DIN ISOON E\t3IBIT- l7 SCALE------. r C C=-!,v CT RA:z:HO CUCAMOtiGA INITIFT. ST:JDy PART I - PRC,�SC: IK'CFt'f=T:ON Sh"T To be completed by applicant ze�-en.al Assessment Review Fee: 587. OD For all projects :requiring environmental review, this for-, nLst be conpieted and submitted to the Development Review Co.--ittee through the department where the pzcject application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Envirc=,,ental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review C=-ittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Cormmiitee will make one of three deter^.:_inations: 1) The project will have no sicni- ficant environmental inpact .:nd a Negative Declaration- will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant envircm-mental impact and an Environ-rental Irpact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report shauld be supp: ied by the applicant giving furthez irfor-a- ® tion concerning the proposed project. PR ,ZZCT TITLE: Haven Plaza A.?PLICFtiT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TET.EPHOA'E: Gilbert Aja Fa Associates , AzChitects Tnc - 25117 P2a-a Pointe Drive suite 100 Lapzu�a Hills . CA alb» f714, 770 2829 ADD?ZSS. TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONT.CTED CONCERAGING THIS PROJECT: Lorinda Mc[allev 'Ci3beTt A_j & Arc . 23117 Plaza Pointe Drive. Suite 100- - >>na u;� ls _ C� o7f,;S (714) 770- 2829 -- LOCATION OF PRWECT (STREET ADDRESS A'QD ASSESSOR PARCEL JO. ) r` )Go street address at this time. APIN 209- 262-17-18-19-20 LIST OTHER PERMITS hTCEcsARy FRO!! LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES XND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I-1 — PRir:7= DESCRY_?II01 i i 'DESCP.IPT:ON OF PP.O_r" . One an3 txo-sto ry Office/ GETden Indu ACRE GE OF PROCT r1 tic i D SQ',;A.R FOOTAGE OF EXISTING A!:D PROPOSED BUILDINGS. IF Ati'Y: 178,160 SO FT 4.00 -ACRES PROPCSED BIDG . 60,670 SQ. F . fDESCR:3r THE Eti ti'IrZJ::y=1T�y SETTING Or' THE PRW-.ncT SITE INCLUDING ON TOPOGv,?:— PLANS (TREES) , FitiIY.L�S, ANY CULTUR^-L, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC F.S;BCTS, USE OF SUFROU'N�ING PRD'zrRTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF A'�'Y EXISTING STRUCTU'rzS AND THEIR USA (AT.-ACE NFrESBARY SHEETS) : THE SITE IS GENTLY SLOPING (LESS THAN 2g11 TO THE SOUTH h EDS W-K SHP.UBS TYPICAL TD THE Ar-f+- SI t 1 ART 0 A PREVIOUSLY MASTER PLANNED SITE I Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of c--ulative actiors, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO 2-2 - =-Ip YES SO X 1. Create a substantial change in grc::nd conto-zrs? X 2. Create a substantial chance in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial charge in demand for =-znicipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. ) ? % 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Reaove any existing trees? Bow zany? % b. Create t`:e need for use or disposal of pcte.tially hazardous a+aterials such as tcxic substances, flaraables or explosives? ® Explanation of any YES answers above: IY?OR.ANT: I_f the project involves t_%e construction of residential units, corplete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATIO'J: I hereby certify that the statements f;:r::isted above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor-atzon required for this initial evaluation to the best of ay ability, and that the facts, statements, and irforraation presented are true and correct to the best of ray knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional infcr ,ation may be required to be submitted before an adeq_ate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Cor._-aittee. Date / igrature " Title 1-3 .�-! RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO C'UCAMONGA PLANNING COPTilISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO, 84-21 LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN 6TH AND 7TH STREETS IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 12th day of June, 1984, a complete application was filed by Aja & Associates for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 27th day of June, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the followina can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes 0 of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of th- applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment awn —that a Negative Declaration is issued on June 27th, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development ReviL-m No. 84-21 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The entrance frame/trellis located at the southern end of the Building One courtyard, shall be extended the entire length of the east elevation, or other architectural structures provided, designed to add variety and visual interest. The final solution shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Resolution No. Page 2 2. Circular windows or other architectural ornamentation shall be added to east facing Building One elevations, to zhe satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. A "passive recreation" area shall be provided contiguous to Building Three south elevations, designed to provide an outdoor patio area which will accommodate tables and seating. 4. A ininimum of 25% of the trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees. 5. Approval of the southerly parcel (Phase 2) does not constitute approval of any ,oecific designs, but shall be approved in concept only. Specific site plans and building elevations shall be required for each future structure or phase of this parcel . 6. Sixteen-inch high sandblasted concrete planters with seating shall be provided in Building 1 entry plazas, and adjacent to Buildings 2 & 3 entrance areas. 7. Building elevations shall be of a uniform, smooth textured, plaster finish. Heavy troweled stucco shall not be allowed. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, a lot line merger shall be required to eliminate lot line through buildings. 2. A gunite or F.C.C. drainage structure shall be provided to 6th Street. The gunite or P.C.C. structure shail be illustrated on the final grading plan. 3. A drainage easement shall be provided for the gunite or P.C.C. drainage structure. IL Resoluti-in No. Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF JUNE, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSTON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: ® AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � Ci� Tr l. iN =C .UU 901 . c+ r4irO end>�c.r�' c ..W. � gLpird o D—�YY r� lu e•` nG cu cv m 4� Gdd.Lr l.u.Li O « 9L^O � qSN pTVTV ^ C.L,. qq` _OW V rV 6� �9 •�� 0= ¢01 Oslo L• r� EL ."Oq Y_p..lq ` Vq 'c E r ^' r CDu q d q PV O�C a r C t w q •n udi I 'U'/A d•^ p O T •` nL_ ¢o Ay rc� Yc �^u o � v� poi do To Y � u vt nC « O aro— rL•' O— ��Y eC P.'O G' LD vrLir@ «�+s ont ` Qo oy a:r ucca•.. =ao �gcgcl ^_ I cY? P a_yY O O 4 W✓ L 0 O d n p ` N� p _slDr ' old °c o.L.�rY c� N $ � ,a_u3 Ili � iaYYn :rogq YD a� L'Y 000nc V .tm4 �•° « uL W= o.L. 0 cvuAc c.r..�o v_e n .grr � L. nr'ry ryA .'+ rqo t= o•� �. L 4gdjd � OO.A.• pO� Vd CC� Y_nr N L+ « q0 YCN_J CPZq « WCN � Sw iC^� p qCa • « s Or _ _ .' o d P o «'^ a 'e e u C .�«`«' c—D LcuDY cQo LZa.= l C' TN ¢c— C [1.0. Q a'o^^•^`— �-�.z ca W�T'M p�> -wq� �` wc� ^ i9.co i� Ndpo c " Y o vva c yy V O N` —r d L C��u` �j I •r d v p N d N t V u d Y.-+ �r d T d i P 6— y g p9 2 N l A j C Or F O O D •Lrr Q V r 6«— W�L 6 0 A 0 I d G _1 `� NI 1 V � O •O •C O Y i o 0 .. u p+ H V g - P S T i q Q 6 n M o•`....�q C O O COY^ O r O A O i N O O Fd 4 O C U O T IV d CrEO L — � q �L� Vr..O ad. S ry � war— w O O_ q FOR qM ee� e -� yq O O q � V .Or•M .-. S YV � •^eV l�00r pq Q Cam. � V f_ L ` 8 C_dN jr L W O M J O y <� WE L nc c._ nyD T — ` O V V C u •r r A O p t O N d C rr V� r � d J1 V ACr G i pP VO��rr Y J 09C O VC q•VY ? CDLC N N M L y f p 4 q LL L N t N A N A ^ .. .• a V• = 1� A L— I L r..� _ N ~I ^I ¢ G A 4 J 60 <u _L J C q d C1i TW >• .l G q�.� C,r c�OjNOrC Y UTV da U✓ 9 ✓ LV C N.' A L G� � LL•-'U« ;e L.`..q _ .Oi�i a ✓.. L' )• y- ,O•. 'r q r ir.. o ` i c 3A u zM-'• u4 � L= -ai• u=- L= .' o«c c ". N or N" �•` u •_'�' rr o- 9 i L N a racq L •O=J dr - OG✓O 'o yr== c _ q e ✓-� o' d« N c-n ✓ _✓r Ot q99 V.�.. C✓ [✓[.... GO d� �_ NM COS C_ 1_ l �Np �w Z O O G l C✓ >•r G O�r q�'.U [+= C Z 7 '_ c O L V.� /J = '` p l� g O �L �7 �P U 7 F C� Y C✓ 9 W q' r N 6 O G�9 = c+ VE •1 E✓ 'S L > L'J_ _ . U N M q^J G _ V p i O V i V G « V q` C O- d N aN= J ?.VO ` � V�_ V F._ •"• �A �� L NL pL W « T dL JVU .r C• YiG ` VO yi7g Oc✓'.. q n' cNE NFU iq p ,LQ aCiVq ^.E .2 � � •r L✓CV ' N ` c i � \. A✓r A _ VL �✓ VZC ` �� Gse.= m9 C✓ �« � 9 GL�O L� ����. J E _9 q V C O G O•` q✓E `L ^v O•v A q f�j q r L a W N✓a =- J^ sir > > T- OVV Lr C _TC p J drNO - L dl - N✓ CL NL d OCe r-✓N7VH .nCN .V.r9 •eLLgG� CO ? CO= - YyC 9D �9 q jg vV N- =rLO yV.• N�Vtr JCS � GN •. VN r y� -�' �9 '�•_ N.']= oo r9 � E cr�'O N gOr9L p� Od L Ap ed > Ciq=�. r C �� d_-O _2 O P�-M C'W q Y v - E ~�0 0 P�O C �✓o q P � L� q_ rt q]w -✓ NV� O �� � P=ar -yp N <•` V O O �` G �y^ V C N Y J L c L C 4« N d U g I L `9 q e 6�a U O V V✓ C V q � V L L=✓ G C N O q 0� N L 2 r « q L ,v� ✓ Aw. V 9 .�.riJ C^=E NCOy V r Pa Y •. 0 GM y� C3�a ` M V c C g q c w N�� v 9 � r L •- 6 L -� V L - V L c y s J p d- N O N UTi V I i n GJ V fNv l a� r a d«L ` W E E✓ o � p-^ _' - C r � G � L < O p V 6� e 0 6 e•r o u 1 �S o�c o-•M cc " 9< N�9�9 ry < dN N G V g O... 9 r t r •r•• C G9 •O«z A J Z V p �j O e-L Y t/ N L L r y " YY- u� 9_ L� r G w d ` C ` r G6 N=>✓ E V 6� C� � « O O P C y« 2 V`J V :5 - -_ E✓ r M L N r A M 6 C € V L O y g f Our 32 C✓ u T G V J` 9 E �L d A coca Lco,n d^ G ✓O d�� `.O r r H i`•r L G✓ c ^E^- 9? g o y d A r ^ a N O L t> L c .L E _-•9 !•'o e ` p V N E d A^ C y O a V �.s O V A V V 1,y r •d V✓ u - ' • CCC VC J L O_C r > L . 4 l N 7✓ N C L N V A E N N <n VqO rP` V ^ L NL _ wJ 9O _ yr y LPp A� C � NJ �PZ C_ L•rV0 0 vP9N4 O d 9 V Gam �y =� N� acc -�Mj q e r i r N C o f i n q r% 'cc-r C h u c pp V 0 2'O L- - a p O G.L.. dt V� SOL_ CV _A 9✓Y JG N CU _LV Cf �L � •nN L<_O C- V - 7Y.�i• ��� 4G! � C Gd Y_ Na«__]. L UOpN C�rJ A i i l J t V T- J P C r w O_ L V N N W a q=•'� G r d a V 9✓f F 9 _J W g A C C l CV+ •w +7 • C V 9 N N o 9 i o c r O J L Lod >•GL >�. c 9' - c"- Guq c^ . " N N�c` ., �c l G C V C �'L N V r ✓ A L O .Li. w V N .� > r P O L. q l V C �C �O ..]•= C-._ O n' V O• l� A.L.. N ' VJq dTu 6Cr V- cViII CCV�9 udCaN eiYOC ri .�Y.� ariV _V✓ •cE 9 •n- g .a}dq " _ C - C! _ .,.Li-- � V tiC ....� VG ' ✓ Vq CN-Z P Cdq- pG C Gt O.Ti � � a' 9 ✓ O O `- N C N d U t.�i-i 9 M G O q ^` O i'O V A N u 61 r C C r 7_U r •w N O N r C}'� 0~ a«L. i. v V VAN . 90r �d� r T� V VCL- 6 C nC`. 0 G qr d > ` ` C J rJ CCO ? L ACfj- A P• VGC'✓ CV L j^ A L rJ N Pr d C ✓9 Y P^ V > C 9 > O j C> N O l V a i ✓V C J V L C g y V 6 d d d t U r V V ao. G rL NO C^Mp NAA tV 9a4 P�E �rYNCA ti�gr l •�L•��/ < Aa < Er6G r ^ `i: 1 O ' P n G - y C L c F L L u C•--`J O G � d� �'T^9.+ r C d o G G L ..,�e y J qr^D_ c ov�'o- c N�� i _ �J•o• ' HE q yr OL PpuN Gy � JOrp 2' -J' O 9� 4 . S ,S^ aa OC•J S' C uc oN ..�G ✓ .. .. = m � 4r .u,. ro r -: _ air -.� on .sue a vculoq - O `a y o - oy _ > •D`. - � Nc. � Mn y = ' •��CY3.''. vs _ri Q=-o Z >.y_ a,o LP ..v a^— � c ..- c iov_ — = 1 c_ a .•r g �. d r q V^.O- L •'.L N v _ 'r C D r > S a � = M r - ✓ 4 y q C L� C ` V 9- p d G O y N U r C -w L'✓W >� C •' 'O. P T O n V r � '•� G y S y 0 6 l q J C d d v u •�V •e p _^p aT_✓ t l -J PC Jp C CrV >yV _ u6 �- ....�Vi. O C - G- 4 � C 9 C.Oi r p V C q E ✓ � D ^•d O N - p� 5 Vcr `Oq Cu C � C i- ` E VO4w 9 .D.. 4 L" LL-✓ �r Or V UJ _ O� � -� • L jPNL p�6� C-� �`r9 �`O •-Durv- � � no qu c' . `'^ m- Gc --- - �- o' •^oJ 3 ca o eysC •C O.z E! P d pC a�L d- Nd� OC '••.L ✓ OTC C ' PG' ONrgM �?- coo P✓ uoL _ o O � - iy-' q�� qc✓ `d -� ._ a P.• a n - icy 9r-• u cam. cb6_. q _ �Li V j N^ C u = C CO � Td ly - JO9� 2` E GN .O T� 7C QO D .J NN 6 V_ _ y � 7M✓ TC C . TLC C6C C �o Nc ✓ •' a vogL aic <- ror Nam. N - o r v_' 4N SNV4 6n 06 < � ty 04 p.✓n ❑ Np aO.ri.. N r �o SJ— ✓ LE'r � oV e� m � O A u ^. uc y ... aGcP -c c. u^ uo a�-rL y c✓ - 9 C > 6 Q - Q 6 O C P O •� O D S i 9 L O <O C O = C P r L � O 7 L A C C .Lp r C Q O • q G 4 =O N t q 2 O 6 t= 6 U r L Y p C = p M p O O G d 4 4 a P 3 S a t d D O L L l O • - 'd O =r N N O^ rdp= UC` ✓p✓ 9 �✓ _U O UN d„ O� ✓ 4 a b t ✓L p O r L . d L C a _ Cy u-ic L OL V✓�- 2c- E =y Pd ar�� �•x Oi rL N� t c'cLc I - ow c� 01 p 4 �'SJ M �� d a� '+ 'C d p •L t 4 y ✓ 'L^� V V .0. C� G 40 V6C jr -�4✓� 0 p< r ✓ q` -I - ✓ 9 Ar P C rN>✓ O rqr L _C ✓ Cr OI L "V 9 E = JC _eG �9 yyCr`O CyOr `O�f. y �P V r Q ✓ r r y O 9 4 o p.Jn L c d 6• O U O .w C ' G J CC O= d .a rp YN r = CO tML 6D PV O_ v Ntu n�C pL SI 9C-O `r i_ Lr P9- s ay-•'V. a ! .e V Ti 4 _... 00 ly�M C6✓ Sy L pC L 9 SPC d✓ i GJ ~CO N L J 9LL .rq 4 `` V `a �O p_ Y c �� .Vi�N ptq N 00 OU-- yLOq Uri 6.y.. p Es�O CSC 40 � O C t.L n✓ C 4 6 q P V T 6� C 0 D C O C�r' C M V` r O ✓ O -E-V .oc oaa. N - <- v - 4 a da c u o.Q ` ra L•.^ .r. o" i -sur .`�✓ Ji✓ W=6.` - O� ` ` = Nd i Y C = W p r q ` � " �r — �— ••�A � T ` �.0.. PP4 O �r J N pl � M J' p r l p N r C j O V y� � > c c� d �c ✓-r 4✓ �• -L C r V ✓ J „ d- ufV 6T J> L' 1L14 6•q=0 -� Od d •O V .>pU CNb - 6 O r r? `V V .✓n r i E 4 P u4i r 4 J M C S.N O ti r L J OZ • I1 \�•L O.I \Yfv 4V 6.tt W i-17 rl V q N �✓ " N _— q� - V L V � — o c u c n N"c �n e u a o N _ _` p u✓ D, G q N6L FOB r. ` C l .J OO OL V✓ C O 6, CY `rL V CP '� O Y Lp pU7 N pqn �� LL 7 V u r N LL c iO✓r N C M V d C q q V 9 N d a O✓ 7 V y 7 ^` O q N ` L.yL J ✓q OLL V L ryN P p— a d . '" d� n _r"L—' ✓N m � >. v � as :>�n n 'e.L. Oz 1 ry V�mG O� C y 7 = ''' d6 ✓ G P a N SI ✓7VC' �GN C✓✓^L 9 � V �� ✓ � dE >agGC fC �• VOd COUrd ^oFVaC O '� C` �L. q = LOCL d0 �� V�q Apr apQ• Od G ✓ _ —✓ r ✓� 6�� q � ry y L C_ a.✓ LL C- a q M y V q 106 NN C 9 LO+{ ✓ E^C 4 O✓ E� j V==a M �? U T ` a.r V c— J i V— _ -'V^ M N uN''^•^ _ N — G ^ N- G _ > M q S` O NE OLY p,O ^Jq nt O Lc' r__ O . V V N L'✓ � N C G l f V � 2 O .✓.. "'� O G O O� L✓ U lL �J yN pP`J NV �� T CV n= V i N LL ✓ Q^ q L' d ^ d V O S j O C H V rl —o �/. i Lag+ E4 r qc c L V. ` M u' `G doCP ^✓ GL �e N L > .a9 NC ✓ b LN .gyp✓ 21 21 N' O� UW O. 7 CL LL✓1 6� O N NI p. VL WNd {yq0 O^ tLO�C2 Qr uI �I� � I I u1 •� N' vl G� `N�'}' oI = Q u� � b E r ��7 " VSN q Q✓=O` TO C 9 ? ✓ C d 6 C O EL T� G b M q d d V t Y 6 ✓O� 4' O C C = s G V l' E O 6 q �L o L • — '.� d G = ^_ d Q a 3✓� G L N L q b� y >✓= e L d � L ✓ ✓ — 6 Q i NLLq � 6 �V — O = y✓ �CjO L�j C t y N C M L Q O qFC OCO _ ca � �^ cn Lour iN dp i — a'N �1 a Oq E� Ld � N ti IP d% _ N ✓£ -mac d_o ice£ 0 > — ENE t✓rye N— i6 � d V I dTV� V CVV dy q ^N = b C O � Lp 9✓�� 4 PYG & Ott � ✓ > _ VD 1E I d Or u 0 'y0 y y L �d L G� ` C�` t L O V O ; — r✓ LL .'l. fJ v V V .> L N O M N q V C r G ✓ 2 C � q F� q q�w v� ✓ o = 2 nco ` b CC VO LrV .r 06 CnV N �E J eCl N ✓ V q r N q 0 � d N C C T'� y = � V� a• I q.:L1 � U C H q�V O ✓ q� MCV V 2✓ V -.6� e I J W r L ✓ l L P0 ✓� lV r20 O jt _`O TL 9 L � �VV O V � G L d N� _ L N a m a✓w � I d S C i 4= N V,r O C O y.6 i y L P q 9 — .. C J C q C L_✓Q C — O N V NO Jq— GN✓ NC 'Y= ` � L nu �� ` E O b d O^ N 9✓ y ✓_ eO L r N 6 N^ qN �� O aqi� ✓n O ✓ G4 U ✓� O it O aL t V g O L o L N N ✓ PNO aLILE 60, ' o c V Q L G y" i N <�_N y 0 �r L'^_ `C N' PY P� L6' O� C OV6 ✓ 6 VO LO dr Cq> <Cm GO b u0 ,YLr �L >ba �4 AGO I ✓ P� � rV V C I r V� �: S G V✓L C 6 r G � � ( ` d^ L �q q V' S I�LNC ( N Iq Q 5-14 r m N i d P � G A v i I I c m y e.� qo u p •oy_'u vu� • ^ � U I r C 7 N N d N O' l � '.' G � O O OL I l O ECT 'O Cp'�71 Y6 r C 'N6 ` P ci r COV —dV �'JLO i u rU! i� V u I I ��. ^� Mr � 7 N9 C L� xN O q O C CN N I 19r� Ef � L_ 9 - -• C iJ .. � vn A I E d _ N My0 iCT N d Eiq Y -rO- V qv L OO d O I yV.fCi GOT CU OHO `S JGr � OT v- .e lL _u rn'� OE vJ ` n > r � V i =I NPN N �-• o`er - uo 01 - o -vG c � cce' Ern N Lo ' ma`s � s -G.rn� Oy-a N GOO SGO� T-.7.. L C✓�� =`_ m E .0..m e L.n - 1 r L L _7 — - Pq nYdn roc 0• d N P Y o O. d d Y— C Jpp r Tr—_ o.O y V � O O 4Ci9 q=CP �jY9 -� L� �fi� UO Mr O '^Lq C T E K O + v q 92 2 1 6 E q O _ >9 C d V p r r -d., y do V.y T n J U ti O L C u q � 0 l O T d r O y � NJ y0 Vr� llt �'G LP nN VE O ` A jinn 1 '^Jin �nV p�� OO c 6q nJ d 9d yyV NO GONC y= — Q�' qN LN . . ..o. Nq ouE _ �Le uN.M rim E NT- 4 O V CO�� P - NT U« CO -V9 J d P 9 1 q n P d C 0 Y O L U— V C n�i,i Y• N-' -.a�.a .- NI u.Ni. =o -y 4 ' - aY CC P_ P N 3 L c_ L Or J S d�' L Lr�a I � PCS Qr� N-I AC V P E J �OV rS V� yr1 PN aOPi_ LO j_ .d.. I _ 20 ia M T Z c-.-J• C O O n- B- i Z m 2 C QaV 4- 6 q G V C O jJ q N O O e� r n Q N rI �� � • WI J Yar C C.,.uLu V r O ! V N w V y C 2 y> > NO •uC NSVp� N 4 iV � � � eL'+V W 4 d a C 2 ` V q ✓ •� � 6� � Y Y V u q O J N C V O V N y-J C V y O V u t T u V G V Q. V L.'.r T err ` VPN CN VV I C�V yP �. qn C .Or C c o �N •J d O V D q� J � O ; C� 6 O O a q� G y E P Cr c� 0 4 d q a Y u u � N yL•_ O✓ 1 7N EO i qEC r PN i rqq L � .` f n V O 6 C G `..r Q i�V a V O i � V Ca � _� � Cu N _ � p• d� d - q r u W C qr uN Or O'er OP> rq ' OV Cr V - r 4 q 1 6 N _! f .L.r O G/ YL Nr Ot L I L oco L _ 00 Ovi ON L O PLu 94i l VPi qU pz— C 6 q O Dry rOL 4'1 y Wy6V �,C aF` Vu r CND -2tt= � NJ G I CuC �W OO.` � P q NulG q u c C O u O 4 ID Y m N L y E r •J_.-•-� T q s � a_Td _T c< I �_ cr P noq �V�W� v 2 eVrO V o..., P l P u L 6r( y OV nN dC C U� Tq ♦ � q cc o ay� d � d t > v w u b j o� rd a I e ✓ C Y • o V V d uY I o cN r I i V ` N N d ✓Y C 2 O V L C C L 4 E y ' � cv q-+ P U nN oy bb rno aoi c_X�. T— a o q • 0-Jlja n � q { \ I � qY _P 9 p• U Pr• p y C O• N` i a ✓60 - i 4 V O ✓ T b t —O O �' N� �• M �y _ % i y � e 9 1 ` b L NC O� •eN � Y�O ��✓ T b e V V^ Y V _ d> ✓ e �_C T N C �. � i _— a O V � •y V�J .e.• C ✓ M y V t Y E L V OqL O ✓ d N✓ ' Q e L V U > V y N a � o co ✓•'� � o M c- ? aw b- c - L V c f V — 6 � O E b u N �•� C��' C v O• F e m ia, as " c �y r . NyOj J= E MI Y d V V e ' y v >•'J T 4 �e L q ` O L j � OI ~ a =d i e o IO i�j � I y C �✓ e O Z j Y 'J .n F w e M C L q e q d �q l e y O W O q N 9 4� � P W V I N l l N N N E �� y N ✓ Ey _O V C OVA �• ' r ` > V CITY OF RANCHO C TITCAi4fONGA GvCA STAFF REPORT zl�l j r c, - F-: � Z DATE: June 27, 1984 �' 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Somez, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner SUBJECT: 19TH STREET CORRIDOR STUDY ABSTRACT: This report outlines the development status of all vacant land in the 19th Street corridor and provides land use descriptions on a site-by-site basis. Staff will be requesting direction from the Commission to consider amendments in specific areas. BACKGROUND: Recently, the Planning Commission has considered several General Plan amendments for changes in land use along the 19th Street corridor. Staff reports and substantial public input at the meetings identified a number of issues dealing with lane use compatibility, ® increased traffic and design. As a result, the City Council formed a subcommittee consisting of two members each from the Planning Commission and City Council to study these issues in a comprehensive fashion. Based on public input and staff analysis, the subcommittee made a series of recommendations to amend the City's Development Code. These have been presented to the Planning Commission at the meeting of June 13, 1984. In addition, the subcommittee also directed staff to study land uses along the 19th Street corridor for presentation to the Planning Commission and to identify land in the following categories: 1. Vacant with no development proposed 2. Vacant with development proposals in process 3. Vacant with approved projects At the June 13, 1984 meeting, the Planning Commission also requested staff to extend the boundaries of the study eastward ::o Milliken along the north side of Route 30. All of these undeveloped areas identified in Figure 1 are presented in the following section of this report. �a? t : ITEM J 19th St Corridor Study Area :!R�a � p �lilr�Tr i _ . ._i"t�i �om.•� 8 1 It .31 4 � I� .25971 s I �� 74 E7 . t • - H ' •i "*ry� ii - 1 it ,d o 0 r_ Figwe 1 wwwmm Single Family Tract �i L = � a VACANT L O Single SET. Co Family L 14010 L 'Flood Cord S.F VACANT L L L 02 • i PLANN?NG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 19th Street Corridor Stu.iy June 27, 1984 Page 2 Area 1: South side of 19th, east of Sapphire Description: Size: ±5 acres General Plan: Low Density Residential Development District: "L" Surroundinq Land Uses: North: Single Family Residential/Low East: Single Family Residential/Low South: Flood Control West: Flood Control Status: Vacant with no development proposals Area 2: East side of Jasper, south of Hamilton Description: Size: ± 10 acres General Plan: Low Density Residential Development District: "L" ® Surroudinq Land Uses: North: Sing a Family Residential/Low East: Single Family Residential/Low South: Single Family Residential/Low West: Single Family Residential/Low Status- Vacant with no development proposals. Tentatively planned as an elementary school site. I Single Family 'Tract NC Comm. Condominiums L Single. c° E NH m Family 1 gth L = Vacant r o � L Si fe Farnily rac Vacant __ L 0 s Vacant LM 3 Area 3: West side of Beryl, south of Hamilton Description: Size ± 5 acres General Plan: Low Medium Residential Development District: LM Surrounding Land Uss: North: Singe Family Residential/L East: Vacant/L South: Approved small lot Single Family Residential/Low-Medium West: Single Family Residential/Low Status: Vacant with no development proposals r;' S Area 4: South side of 19th Street, west of Beryl Description: Size: ± 5 acres General Plan: Low Density Residential Development District: L Surrounding Land Use: North: Condominiums/MH cast: 1 Single Family Residence/Church/L South: Single Family Residential/L West: Single Family Residential/L Status: Vacant with no development proposals Area 5: West side of Beryl, ±660 feet nort%' of 19th Street Description: Size: ± 3 acres General Plan: Medium High Residential Development District: MH Surroundinq Land Uses: North: VacafRt Rt. 3U Freeway East: Single Family Residential/L South: Church West: Condominiums/MH Status: Vacant with no development proposals Area 6: South si'" of 19th Street, east of Bery_1_ Description: Size: ± 15 acres General Plan: Low Density/Residential Development District: L Surrounding Land Uses: Norht:,Sing a Family Residential/L East: Single Family Residential/L South: Single Family Residential,Vacant/L West: Single Family Residential, Vacant/L & LM Status: Vacant land with no development proposals, except for ±4 acres in the northwest portion of the site: Tentative Tract 12577 approved for 14 single family residences. Due to expire January 25, 1986, unless recorded. —J �l san9le Vacant M` O Family Tract ® F.S. Vary &F IM SF JE P-o• 12597 Op M , Faml79 Vacantl L Vacant_ in L O Fa Hy' : c L S.F.T. Homes L L Area 7: Bet,�reen Heilman and Amethyst ±660 feet so y*h of 19th Street Descr— ipt70n_ Size ± 10 acres General Plan: Low Density Residential Development District: L Surroundin Land Uses: North: Single Fami y Residential/L East: Single Family Residential/L South: Single Family Residential/L Status: Vacant with no development proposals ar •. Area 8: hest side of Wneth.rst, ±660 feet north of 19th Street Description: Size: ± 4.5 acres General Plan: Medium Density Residential Development District: M Surrounding'Land Uses: North: Vacant, proposed Rt. 30 freeway East: Fire station, Vacant, MH South: Res. care facility for the elderly/Single family residences West: Townhomes/M Status: Vacant with no development approvals. Preliminary discussions indicate property owners intent to file for a senior housing project cn this site. Area 9: North side of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archibald Description: Size: ± 18 Acres General Plan: Medium High Residential & Office Professional Development District: MH & OP Surrounding Land Uses! North: Vacant, proposed Rt. 30 Freeway East: Neighborhood Commercial/NC South: Single Family Residential , Vacant/L .; West: Offices, Fire Station Status: Vacant; Tract 12597 filed for most =. this site by Lincoln Property Company. The proposed project would consist of 200 multiple family units at about 18 du/ac, and is scheduled for Planning Commission review on July 11, 1964. Area 10: South side of 19th Street, east of Amethyst Description: Size: About 6.5 acres General Plan: Low Density Residential ? Development District: L Surrounding Land Uses: North: Vacant, MH East: Single Fanily Residential/L South: Mobile Hcmes/L West: Single Family Residential/L Status: Vacant with no deveio�wlent proposals. Ask rs fAC 11781 VACANT APT. OP ;i:- VACANT 4a L ,3 r . • 1 q, C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 19th Street Corridor Study June 27, 1984 Page 7 Area 11: North side of 19th, east of Ramona 0: motion: Size: About 30 acr^. General Plan: Medium Density Residential Development District: M Surrounding Land Uses: North: Vacant, proposed Rt. 30 Freeway East: Vacant, LLM & OP South: Single Fanily residential/L West: Apar`,ments/MH Status: Excepting a, church site at mid-block, this area is vacant. However, there are tentative tracts approved in this area, as follows: a. Tentative Tract 11625/Roberts This is a tract map for 02 condominiums approved by the City in 1981. The tentative map will expire January 28, 1984, unless recorded. b. Tentative Tract 11781/Roberts This is similar to the above; a tract map for 76 condominiums. A request for extension of this map was recently denied by the Planning Commission; however, following an appeal by the developer, the City Council has overturned the Commission and granted an extension of the tentative map to April 22, 1985. The map will expire on April 22, 1985, unlesr recorded by the developer. c. Tentative Tract 11853/Barrett Irvine This is a tentative map for 2�ominiums approved by the City in 1981. The proposed project has a density of ahout 14 du/ac, and is due to expire on October 28, 1984, unless recorded or extended by the Commission. These three approved projects contain a total of 250 dwellings, and their effect on the area is likely to be significant, especially in light of the existing low density development on the south side of 19th Street. However, the Barrett project (TT 11853) abuts even higher densities ;MH) on the west where the existing Fredrick's apartments are located. In addition, the site backs up to the Rt. 30 Freeway on the north. Finally, it must be noted that unless the developers let the maps expire (which is unlikely in the Roberts case) the maps will be recorded at the curre:stly approved densities. ,; , ,\ . .y,. �' • .�_ _ a �:_� ..,.,_ - . '� ,. ,. ;: =:: .a r� '..'r _ . , . �'�?u .. _, ` ._ . r Y .. �. �.�; '�;; � � -- .. u ` ;'. .� '," .',... .', �.. _ ...f-! L :J_! 1%: 1���..f.�f is 1-". � .'•' .. � .� .. , n ' �. � e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 2EPORT 19th Street Corridor Study June 27, 1984 Page 8 Area 12: North side of 19th Street, east side of Hermosa Description: Size: ± 13 acres General Plan: Off ice/Professional & Low Media;. Residential Development District: OP & LM Surroundin Land Uses: North: Vacant, Rt. 30 Freeway East: Single Family ResidentialJL South: vacant/L West: Vacant/M Status List: Vacant with no development proposals Area 13: South side of 19th Street east of Hermosa Description: Size: ± 11 acres General Plan: Low Density Residentiai Development District: L Surrounding Landnt Uses: North: Vacant/OP East: Single Family Residential/L South: Park site, Single Family Residential West- Single Family Resid.-ntial/L Status: Vacant with no development proposals. Area 14: North side of 19th Street, between Hermosa and Haves, Description: Size ±10 acres General Plan: Low Density Development District: L Surroundinc Land Uses: North: acant, t. Freeway East: Single Family Residential/L South: Single Family Residential/L West: Single Family Residential/L Status: Agricultural with no development proposals. A f t i y � n• •e - f 1f�1 a ' ► •' ih 111.anu � WIVIIZZiWIY ')IArr KCrVKI .9th Street Corridor Study June 27, 1984 Page 9 Area 15: North side of Hiahland, ±660 feet east of Haven Description: Size: ± 60 acres General Plan: Medium :sigh Residential Development District: MH Surrounding Land Uses: North: Vacant/L"O East: Vacant/LM South: Vacant, Rt. 30 Freeway West: Vacant, approved shopping center/NC Status: Vacant, with a 936-unit apartment project filed on about 50 acres. Review of the project brought out a number of concerns from both staff and community groups. Staff now is in the process of analyzing potential environmental impacts; likely to recozsend that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared to address the full range of environmental issues. ® Area 16: north side of Highland, west of Milliken. Description: Size: s70 acres General Plan: Medium Density Residential Development District: M Surrounding Land Uses: Korth: Vacant LM F ood Control East: Vacant/LM Proposed in County Souti:: Vacant/Proposed Rt. 30 Freeway West: Vacant/MH Status: Vacant, with no development proposals The issues affecting this area are different from those along the 19th Street corridor. Here, the question is not that of compatibility with existing low intensity development. Rather, at issue 7s a resolution of environmental problems such as drainage and flooding, provision of proper infrastructure, and application of appropriate development standards. -13 F:' ��• - z"L. t,orr100r 5tUdy June 27, 1984 Page 10 RECOMMENDATION: It is recormnended that the Co=ission discuss each area as outlined in this report and -irovide staff with direction in specific areas. If land use amendments are to be considered in specific areas, star will initiate the public notification and hearing process for Commission review at a future date. No foal action is necessary are tonight's meeting. Resp Ctfu 7 submitted, RiFk ez / C=t nn Yj r r. C CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1tiIONGA cvcAn1p STAFF REPORT Z_ UI a DATE: June 27, 1984 19-17 TO: Planninq Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: ETIWANDA AREA DRAINAGE POLICIES In recent weeks interest and actual development activity in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area has been on the increase (see attached exhibit). This increase in activity has raised concerns as to the adequacy of drainage facilities throughout the Etiwanda and Foothill Community Plan areas. At the current time, this area lacks a Master Plan. of Drainage which reflects the recently completed planning process and major changes in the Day, Etiwanda and San Sevaine Channels which are currently being considered for adoption by the County Fnntana D.^.+. ;- ^d �.. " jaStE- , .'.•� vur$c�•c�. n 1'IGD�ct r1 all YIIIi ut developed as a part cf 1984-85 budget in cooperation with the County. The plan will deal with the County area northerly of Etiwanda in the Foothills Community Plan. Because of the total lack of adequate regional and local drainage facilities in this area, it would be recommended that development phasing and implementation guidelines be included as a part of this study. In order to avoid problems more serious than those being experienced in the west=_rl; portion of the City, extensive use of detention- facilities will be necessary along with programmed drainage facility construction. The most serious concern related to the drainage issue is the disposition of development applications until adoption of the drainage and implementation plan has taken place. Three options were recently reviewed with the Advisory Commission: 1. Restrict development applications in the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area until adoption of the Drainage Plan. 2. Allow applications to be accepted and reviewed subject to individual environmental review and potential denial, postponement or conditional approval. 3. All development to continue unrestrained with extensive provision of temporary detention facilities to mitigate the impact of increased runoff. This alternative although potentially workable involves significant maintenance and liability concerns. It is their recommendation that Option 2 be implemented with the intention of only allowing those projects to proceed which have adequate downstreau facilities without extensive use of interim retention facilities. 7F�1 YTEM L U. ^• ` •" w °;+»Lu7 DIArr KtfUKI Etiwanda Area Drainage Policies June 27, 1984 Page 2 CONCLUSION: I" is rocommended that the Commission review the issue and consider a policy dire,tion for recommendation to the City Council. Staff would recommend adoption of a policy consistent with the Advisory Commission recommendation until such time as a phasing policy can be established as a part of the Etiwanda Drainage Plan. Respectfully subW tteedd, LBH: " a Att chment 0 l(fl2V59�i rrizvcz — � � • -��� •�•. tit:.br)M J yi-'.