Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984/09/12 - Agenda PacketI ::> c M:l m :Z;, C-) 1 to 00 c .=- 3 1. ACTIONS 4 -0 -1 as Corrected Approved 4 -0 -1 Approved 4 -0 -1 Approved 4 -0 -1 ls' QTY Or RANCHO CUCVNIONGA PLAITNLNG LO:t"EMISSiONT AGENDA, WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 12, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS P_k " OMMIINITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roll Call Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Chitiea X Commissioner McNiel X III. Announcements *P, C. P. C IV. Approval of Minutes August 8, 1984 V. Consent Calendar Commissioner Rempel A Commissioner Stout X Tour 9/29, City Council determinations on appeals The following :onsent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- contreversial. They will be acted on by the C- mmission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. APX 310-082 -6, 28, 29, 30. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL Located on the north side of Vicars APN 1061 - 141 -06. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENT Re,noved for discussion D. Approved 4-0 -1 with cla- rification that Banyan be brought up and continued. fJ 4U01-6 AlNla IUOL -a - - Located on the south and Mil]iken Avenues - - ,., r v�a l 4VAMA L UIttar. %. V rLr V lta l lur! - A cuSiom iol residential subdivision of 46 acres into 33 lots in the Hillside Residential District, generally located on the north side of Almond, between Sapphire and Turquo:se - APN 200 -061 -12; 200-051 -06, 07; 1061 - 172 -03. TIME Liunlrinx - A resldentlai su=vlsion of 19 lots on 6.0 acres of land in the Low Residential District, located south of Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue - APP£ 201 - 251 -63 & 64. Approved 4 -0 -1 E. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACTS 11625 AND 11781 - DALY - 178 condominiums on 13.7 acres of land located on the northwest corner of 14th Street and Hermosa. Removed to D.R. for F. PERIMETER WALL DET discussion. Approved 4 -0 -1 12317 - LEWIS HOMES to have 500' of walls covered with vines and to hav Approve? 4 -0 -1 G. GRADING iv ODIFICATI, BUILDERS VL Public Hearings Approved 4 -0 -1 to in- clude addendum on page 5. stucco finish on walls. 3S TO TRACT 12238 - CITATION The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. H. ENVIRON Approved 4 -0 -1 with L modification to Condition #,18 regarding concrete ribbon drain. Approved 4 -0 -1 J. Approved 4 -0 -1 with K. amendment to require fencing in conformance to State law for day care ctrs. Approved 3 -1 -1 to have L, Avalon connect; require an- nexation to existing Home- owner's Assn. and eliminate pL one lot along west edge. corner of Haven 208 - 344 -01, 04. 1SSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8345 - - A division of 37 acres of land into 3 (Medium High Residential and O/P districts located on the northwest Avenue and Arrow Highway - APN AL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE n. rivvvvu - ti resiaenuai oeveiopment of uu townhouse units on 7.85 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du/ac) located on the south side of Arrow between Madrone and Baiter - APN 207 - 261 -07. AND v�•u�rf :� ��.�e�ar.� :a w�� iamuy detached houses ou 15.2 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 du /ac) generally located between Ramona and Turner, approximately 1000 feet south of Baseline - APN 1077 - 032 -11 2, 3, 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT R3 -9.n - kiucT gParimi7 AeQV%9=T v nr n v"%,n - ine ceveiopment of a 24,475 square toot church facility and a request to operate a preschool on 4.29 acres of land in the Low Residential district (2-4 dulac) located on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Calaveras and Sierra Madre Avenue - APN 207 - 342 -12. Gv�4:1r� sal =r.•�.� - n -u vy tvlc rLmi -h resiuenuai suDeivision of i4 lots on approximately 4.28 acres La the Low Medium Development District (4-8 dulae) located west of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street - APN 202 -032 -22 and 25. ,,.'6114 .. Approved 4 -0 -1 M. ENVIRONMt 41AL- E1AJL�= ��L1_�L : >f,u .L.,._-.. - ._. 12727 - A -M COMPANY --A residential subdivision creating 21 single family residential lots and one open space lot already developed, on 2.6 acres in the Low Medium Development District, located west of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street - APN 202 - 032 -69, 10, and 71. i :, . Approved 4 -0 -1 as amend N• HAVEN AVENUE STUDY Denied 4 -0 -1 because O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT of inconsistency with Haven REVIEW - 84 -30 REITER - The development of 4 industrial Avenue Design policies. buildings totaling 76,120 square feet on 5.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street. n , ..;rte Approved 4 -0 -1 to affirm?. POLICY DECISION ON THE LOCATION OF PORTA13LE existing requirements of RECYCLING CENTERS -Oral Report Development Code and refer back to staff. T%. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the n Commissio Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IL Adjoumment 1:15 a.m., Thursday 4/13/84 The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. --- --+ Y =f 4, cuO. +GaG.- GV.ST, Couar. aEGloa.t ..i. / 0WAX10 INTEaN.710N11 .O Vr - septymw 12, 198+ ?LANN046 COMMissioi.! CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAA%3#-A t1. JAC•iir— &A �! c`j Cfi 4' OF RAINCHO CT CkNIO GA PI_. NT'v'I: \�Cs CQ;�'I��IISSTJN . AGENT -i .. 19.. WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 12, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNfA L Pledge of Allegiance U- Roll Can Commissioner Barker Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel IV_ Approval of Minutes August 8, 1984 V. Consent Calendar Commissioner Rempel_ Commissioner Stout The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. C3 C. APN 210 -082 -S, 28, 29, 30. Located on the nc APN 1061- 141 -06. -2 - Located on the south and Milliken Avenues - PARCEL .MAPS 6962 - KEY - of Vicara Drive at Jasper Street - TRACT 10210 - r - n mmt,..,, t.,r resiaentiai submvision of 46 acres into 33 lots in the Hillside Residential District, generally located on the north side of Almond, between Sapphire and Turquoise - APN 200 - 061 -12; 200 -051 -06, 07; 1061 - 172 -03. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10076 - IG T ER - A residential subdivision of 19 lots on 6.9 acres o din the Low Residential District, located south of Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue. APN 201 - 251-63 & 64. E. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACTS 11625 AF's 11781 - DALY - 178 condominiums on 13.7 acres of land located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa. F. PERIMETER WALL DETAILS - TRACTS 12316,12316-1 AND 19317 - i.FWM unnrtrc G. GRADiI\TG i ODIFiCATIONS TO TRACT 12230 - CITATION BUILDERS VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. PIease wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to S minutes per individual for each project. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL I;AP 8345 - onnv -,a aivision of si acres of iana into s parcels in the 11H (Medium High Residential and O/P (Office /Professional) districts located on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Highway - APN 208 - 344 -019 04. L ENV iRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT J. i.zozl - ;uunlvuuv - a resiaentiai aevelopment of 9u townhouse units on 7.85 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du/ac) located on the south side of Arrow between Madrone and Baker - APN 207 - 261 -07. �11M rc9 �. �. W -V=Nw� family detached houses on 15.2 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4-8 du /ac) generally located between Ramona and Turner, approximately 1000 feet south of Baseline - APN 1077 -032 -1, 2, 3, 4. & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL a a.usrua 00 —Lu — r&1 l Jrt lNlan LilaziVIDLI Vr tsuv CHURCH -The development of a 24,475 square FqZt church facility and a request to operate a preschool on 4.29 acres of land in the Low Residential district (2-4 du/ac) located or. the south side of Arrow Highway, between Calaveras and Sierra :Madre Avenue - APN 207- 342 -12. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1 979% - A -N r.n%11 AM --A r.ir on approximately 4.28 acres in the Low Medium Development District (4-8 du/ac) located west of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street - APN 202 -032 -22 and 25. 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12727 - A -M COMPANY - A residential subdivision creating 21 single family residential lots and one open space lot already developed, on 2.6 acres in the Low Medium Development District, located west of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street - APN 202- 032 -69, 70, and 71. VII. New Business N. HAVEN AVENUE STUDY O. nr.vtnw nr;nrnK - ine oeveropment of 4 inaustrrat buildings totaling 76,120 square feet on 5.68 acres of land in Cie Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street. VIIL Director's Reports P. I L Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Admiristritive Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go b?yond that time, they shaII be heard only with *he consent of the Commission. k;1: T r CUC!✓Ow .!- f:ulFr COUwf♦ NEGrON! •. -N / WARM Mrt *NlrlCNl6 AWfOAT- Sq*ember m, 198+ PLANNW& COMMIS5f0►J t1TY OF RQNCHO CUCAN OW.4 I . MINUTES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 8, 1984 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman Stout led in the pledge of allegiance. # $ # # # ROLL CALL PRESENT: David Barker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner; Dan Coleman, Senior Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward A. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer ANNOUNCEMENTS City Planner, Rick Gomez, introduced Dino Putrino, new Assistant Planner, to the Commission. # # # # # CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to approve the Consent Calendar. A. THEME PARK - LEWIS HOMES - A 10,000 square foot theme park located on the southeast corner of Haven and Base Line. PUBL'ir- NFGRTN(jS B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-15 - TOEWS - The establishment of a 4- bedroom Bed and Breakfast Inn within the Christmas House historic landmark on .89 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and north of 6th Street in the Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) designation. Senior Planner, Tim Beedle, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Jay Iisley, co- aplicant, indicated he has read the staff report and has expressed concern with street tree and garage requirements. Mr. Art Bridges, Alta Loma resident, supported the bed and breakfast inn concept indicating it will be an asset to the community. There were no further comments and Chairman Stout closed the public hearing. There was Commission discussion an use of the house for small wedding receptions, landscaping and tree types, requirements for a garage, who the reviewing body should be, and meandering sidewalk. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Chitiea, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -75, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -15 with a delay of 4 -5 years in the requirement for a garage subject to review by the Design Review Committee, limitation to wedding receptions based on the number of available parking spaces, crape myrtle trees to be integrated into landscaping, use of meandering sidewalk, and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Chairman Stout cautioned Mr. Ilsley that if there are problems resulting from receptions, the Conditional Use Permit would be subject to review by the Commission. * f 6 i f C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -14 - VFW - A request to operate a meeting hall and to serve alcoholic beverages in an existing building with a lease space of 5,000 square feet on 3.47 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 3) category located at 8751 Industrial Lane - APN 209- 031 -74. Senior Planner, Tim Beedle, reviewed the staff report. The Commission, requested investigation of conformance with ABC requirements and whether business closing times had been reviewed. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Gene Barnes, 6123 7th Street, Junior Vice Commander of Upland- Cucamonga Post 8680, advised they have an approved ABC license and that only VFd members and their guests are allowed. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 August 8, 1984 Mr. Barnes requested reconsideration; of time restrictions set in the resolution. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Following brief discussion on parking space availability and possible conflict Yho rnndii -innal 11¢0 pprmiY hp brought back for Commission review. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -76 approving Conditional Use Per-.It 84 -14, with the deletion of Condition 2 in Section 2 of the resolution :-Pla: ing to time limitations, and direction to staff to bring this item back to the Commission for review twelve (12) months from this approval D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8653 - GOLSTEIN AND MAC BETH - A division of 5.717 acres into 2 District (Subarea 3) located at Archibald Avenue - APN 209 - 031043. parcels within the General Industrial the southwest corner of 9th Street and Associate Civil Engineer, Shintu Bose, reviewed tha staff report and replied to Chairman Stout's question relative to the division of parcels at this time. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitiea, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -77, approving Parcel Map 8653 with issuance of a Negative Declaration. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 84 -02 - Amendments to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Sections 17.02.110, 17.06.090, 17.07.050, and 17. 02.020, Title 17 of the Municipal Code, in relation to time extensions, public hearing notification, transition of density, neighborhood compatibility (side plan design, landscaping, open space, grading, architecture), and preservation of viewshed. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout questioned the lack of provision for r_oti£ication language to govern single family detached housing in large projects as it relates to infill. hL . Gomez explained how this category would be covered within the proposed amendwz.t. Commissioner Rempel questioned conflicts between the General Plan and the proposed amendments to the Development Code as it relates to affordable housing and whether this has been reviewed by the City Attorney to be sure there are no conflicts. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 August 8, 1984 Mr. Hopson replied he has not gone through the Development Code or the General Plan section by section but did not envision that there are any conflicts because usually notice requirements or ether references are deferred back to the Development Code. Mr. Gomez indicated that staff has gone over both and it does not appear there is any apparent internal conflict but is seen as further implementation of eoliet and statement_ Additionally, it is thnucht to ho consioten� i„ hc,.ssng and land use with the existing language, but does discourage dissimilar product types that would promote incompatibility. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Mr. Rick Dixon, 16152 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, California, asked about density transition; however, did not feel it should be addressed here. He further advised that absolute policies are addressed in the zoning map and the General Plan. Ther> was discussion regarding density raage and sensitivity and Chairman Stout defined the concept as having two parts: the law, and the Planning Commission which is charged with interpreting what the law means. Further, the Planning Commission does set preced.::,ts .nd compatibility and sensitivity are subjective with decisions regarding these issues made on a case by case basis. There were no further comments and Chairman Stout closed the public hearing. Discussion ensued regarding the permissive nature of language cintained within the proposed Development Code notification section as well as the notifiction process itself. Further questions were asked regarding usable open space, h•.iman scale, and the change in language tenor of the proposed ordinance from positive to negative. Follo -Ting consensus on language changes, it was moved by McNiel, seccnded by Barker, to adopt Resolution No. 64 -79 approving Development Code Amendment No. 84 -C2 with modifications to page F -12, section 4, that street pavement width for the 2 -8 du /ac category be changed to 36 feet standard with the rest of the description deleted; insertion of section 4, page 12, into ordinance on page F -16; language changes on page F -15, slope planting, for clarification; the word all to be deleted from section R, page F -3 relative to visitor parking; provision cf homeowners associations under certain circumstances: addition of language, "may be permitted" to F -17, architecture relating to L -M density; deletion of permissive language within the proposed notification section as ..Cll as the notification process itself; change in language tenor of the proposed ordinance which runs from positive to negative, to be consistently positive; and, recommendation for approval of the enacting ordinance by the City Council. Commissioner Rempel asked that the proposed amendment be checked for inconsistency with the General Plan or, be brought back to make the General Plan consistent with what has just been done. Commissioner Barker asked if an amendment could procedurally be made. Mr. Hopson replied there would not be a problem. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 August 8, 1984 Commissioner McNiel stated he would accept the amendment in order tc be consistent with the mntion. M Gomez advi -d that the Commission would be limited in time constraints in forwarding the ordinance to the City Council if an amendment is required. After brief discussion, Mr. Hopson advised tlat the Commission has already found that the Development Code is consistent with the General Plan and Commissioner Hempel`s argument is on a philosophical plane. He further stated that hie office can look at this to be sure there are no technical inconsistenc_es. Tba motion then carried, with Commissioner Rempel dissenting, citing his belief that there are inconsistencies between the General Plan and the Development Code amendments. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, carried, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -78 approving amendment to tentative map time extensions and recommending its approval by the City Council. �t �t aye 8:35 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:45 p.m. The Planning Comission reconvened. f ■ c f � F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 84 -03 - An amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Coce, Title 17 of the Aunicipal Code, amending Chapter 17.08, Residential Districts, regarding residential development standards and, in particular, amendments to the Low - Medium residential development standards. Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report. He requested that street pavement width for the 2 -8 du /ac category on page F -12, section 4, be changed to 36 feet standard and that the remainder of the description be deleted. He further requested that section 4 be added to the ordinance on page F -16, which had inadvertently been left out and suggested language changes on page F -15, slope planting for clarification purposes. C ,)mmissioner Hempel questioned setback requirements shown in Exhibit A in 5,000 - 6,000 square foot lots. Following discussion by the Commission and staff, the Commission concurred that variations might be precluded and asked that those standards be examined to see if there is adequate space for variations. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public_ hearing was closed. PLANNING COMMISSIC-1 MINUTES E August 8, 1984 Following brief discussion by the Commission, Mr. Gomez stated that based on the direction given by Commissioner Rempel, setback standards can be looked at during time Design Review Comm=ittee meetin .-s and if any problems come forward, they will be referred back to the Commission. Chairman Stout objectea and indicated if there are problems, this should be reviewed and brought back to the next meeting. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -80 approving amendment 84 -03 of the Development Code with modifications regarding street width as presented by Mr. Coleman with the addition of rural character and 2B standards to 2C, including rural character; transition of visitor parking and language change under slope plantings; provision of homeowners associations under certain cicumstances; material in F -16 added which had been left out; F -17 to add the language, "may be permitted"; and, deletion of item E in exhibits A and B because garag s less than 18 feet are no longer allowed. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, carried un- nimously, tc adopt Resolution 84 -53A, with modifications to 36 -foot width street standards and rural character. DRAFT EIR FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12376 - FORECAST - A custom lot subdivision of 16 lots on 20.9 acres and a conceptual master plan for 94 acres of adjacent land in the Hillside Residential and Open Space Districts, located north of Almond Street, generally west of Sapphire Street. Chairman Stout advised that a public hearir.3 had inadvertently been advertised for this item to be heard at this meeting; however, the scheduled date for Planning Commission review is actually August 22, 1984. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by M_-Niel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to continue this item to the August 22, 1984 meeting. Commissioner Rempel stated that he, Mr. the construction_ superir_tendert of the Hellman met and discussed grading and the fcr this project. He asked that because at this site, more definitive criteria developed. Rougeau, Mr. Beedle, Mr. Grant, and apartment complex at Foothill and wall on the south side of the street of final grading and other problems for changes to approved projects be Following brief discussion, Chairman Stout requested that Commissioners Rempel and Chitiea comprise a subcommittee to work with staff to resolve these issue° and bring their findings and suggestions back to the Commission. i ■ i 4 i PLANNLNG COMMISSION MINUTES 6 August 8, 1984 ADjOURiZONT Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adjourn. 9 :3e p.m. The ?lancing Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez Deputy Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION MINU:'Es 7 August 8, 1984 E I] E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT DF.TE: September 12, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krail, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 7061 -2 AND 7061 -3 - 1977 ,, - w�a�uu uli Luc wuim niue ui oLn �Lree and Milliken Avenues - APN 210 - 082 -6, 23, 29, 30 Kaiser Development Company, developer of Parcel Map 7061 -2 and 7061 -3, is requesting an extension of time due to present economic conditions. These Maps were tentatively approved by Planning Commission on September 9, 1931 as Parcel Map 7061 to divide 78 acres into 45 parcels (4 phases) in the Industrial Development District. The first phase, Parcel Map 7061 -1 has recorded. An extension of time was granted on July 27, 1983. This extension expires on September 9, 1984. Tentative Parcel Maps are currently valid for a maximum of four years with appropriate extensions per the Subdivision Map Act. Since the initial approval for the subject Maps was 24 months and a one -year extension was granted, an additional one -year extension may be granted at this time. The approved tentative map and conditions of approval are attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a 12 -month extension be granted Parcel Maps 7061-2 7061 -3 with the expiration date being September 9, 1985. This is the final extension that can be granted. lly subl,�itted, :jaa Attachments ITEM A ' i -�I t i I -� ��• . zX Is � O ill.G +�i�ia all YM I. ,� �^:x "i I; F l I I. 1 =si sl j "i ABC Fb1—' I � P CT • \$ I. �O e ham+ I' �I i = MQ A M E I.0 F l I ABC Fb1—' I � P CT • \$ I. �O e ham+ I' �I i = MQ A M E I.0 (L "•.J E 0 a CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,�tO \'CA A c: 6z ENGINEERING DIVISION a �� VICINITY NIAP title; I f - y N I page K�1p5Ed4 ®EVELOPNIErJr can47PA1Vr INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SOUTHWEST August 14, 1984 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Barbara Krall Community Develcpment Department Engineering Division Re: Time Extension for Parcel Map 7061 -2 and 7061 -3 Dear Ms. Krall: In reference to ou- conversation on August 10, 1984, and Mr. Paul A. Rougeau's letter of July 30, 1984, which noted that the subject parcel maps would expire or. September 9, 1984. To avoid expiration of our approved parcel mars, we wish to apply for an extension. Because of the present economic conditic t has made the development of the property noted in the parcel maps would not be feasible at the present time. For this reason, we wish to apply for a time extension of 12 montL•s for parcel map 7061 -2 and 7061 -3. Encloaed is our check #2117 in the amount of $124.00 for the extension fee. We appreciate your cooperation in this matter, and if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, E. Woodward, Jr. Manager of Engineering andlConstruction /tlf A wha:y OwrwO Suoaraury oI Ka.S r Aluminum 6 Cho ,Cr J CO=OrallOrl C 11 2121 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. SUITE 201. P.O. BOX 308. CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 9200& -0080 TELEPHONE: (619)43 8-2838 7�oC^UFOP ACArw�vr KM. MVKAWMCW4TM CAKNrMO. CXVOUSTfO�LI C011�,ErM'rgl CYpO[ TRIES -w S,ENNST►TVSALAME�l,ti1/rm'�NM l�FliiLiAT[iACL.TC3- M6'Y..JWIO[ A - -y RESGL'JTI ON NO. 31- Iv2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C01'MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP DUMBER 7061 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7061) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND CLEVELAND AVENUE. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap Number 7061, submitted by Kacor Development Company and consisting of 45 parcels, located at the south- east corner of 6th Street and Cleveland Avenue, being a division of Lot 17, 18, 23 and north 1!2 of Lots 24 and 26 as recorded Map Book 4, page 9, San BernE..iino County was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; anal. WHEREAS, on July 16, 1981, a fornzl application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. NO1.4, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the foiloaing findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on September 9, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7061 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1981. ® PLANNING COMMi ISSION OF THE CIT`( OF RANCHO CUCAn"'ONGA A-.5 Resolution No. Page 2 BY: UUc/ .� l ' vnzz,;/ Ucr- a r, ng, c•rair-Yan / X/ AA-ST: Secretary of the Planning CDnF Sslon I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planniing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting o the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of September, 1981, by the following Vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONL °S: Remnei, Dahl, Tolstov, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COT-41ISSIONERS: None ABSTAINED: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka LI 0 (C C CITY Or ^';CHO CL'CX-110I7GA CITY ENMIEER'S REPORT FILED BY: R. C. Land Co. TENTATIVE MAP NO.PM 7051 LOCATION: South side of 6th Street between Cleveland DATE FILED: 7116/81 and Milliken NUMBER OF LOTS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 17, 18, 23 and N 112 of RECEIPT NUMBER: 12155 Lots 24 & 26 as recorded !B 4 Page 9 FEE: S250.00 ZONE: M -2 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Derbish & Guerra GROSS ACREAGE: ADDRESS: 124 East "F" Street, Suite_12 MINIMUM LOT AREA: Ontario CA 91764 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ® RECORD OWNER(S) R. C. Land 380 W. Foothill, Suite C ADDRESS Rialto. CA 92376 PHONE r REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications X 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on �,ie tentative map. X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 14 additional feet on Cleveland Avenue 30 additional feet on 6th Street additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other X 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be dedicated alona lots 6 -11 contiguous to 6`ciSt except two 50' openings centered on property lines betty n 1ntg 7 R & 10. _ 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: �i 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 Iq -7 � t TEN ;:ATIvE MAP NO. 7061 Page Improvements (Sonding -is requirea prior to X__� Recording forphases 1,2, S 3 1 Building permit for pnase 4 X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, ona drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. (sidewalk on one side in separate easement) X 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *including landscaping and irrigation on meter STREET i lA; NE 6th St. Cleveland Milliken I GUTTER GUTTER X X X I . VMT. X X X WALK X X X APPR. X X X TREES X X X j LIGHTS x X __��- X ISLLAND *� x X OTHER I El X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric potirer, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to he underground. XX 17. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County.Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative Poles with underground service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C_ overlay: 17. The r"o owing specific dimensions, i.e., cu -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: __ 18. The ro owing ex streets are substandard: They will require Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval X San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other ties involved. Approval of the final. map will he subject to that may Le received from them. , RCE 20 r from CALTRANS/ interested agen- any requirements �? c TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7061 Page 3 X 2i. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: _ B_ City: X C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: X E. Cucamonga County Water District: slier and water F. Other: Mao Control X 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way -_.affic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The fcllowi;c lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area ,rt shoo:_ be corrected on the final map: = :i corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located .26. The boundary of the Tentative flap needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. ® Parcel Mao waiver 28_ Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) ❑ Building permit for ) X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. _ 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line ray be required to div?rt sheet_ runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. 1' water surface is above top of curb, 30" wails shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will be required to, assess impact or increased runoff. X 34. Installation of a portion of the Master Planned Storm Grain No. 7E may be required at the discretion of the City Engineer. TheTextent of the improve- ment shall be as determined by the City Engineer and to be coordinated with Assessment District 79 -1 project. RCE 20 C� TENIATIVE '(AP NO. _2D l ;c Page 4 144scellanerus X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. X 36. noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. _ 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 33. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimerita tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for.the follow- - ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Civision. X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision flap Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public.entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final 0 map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At the time of Final Flap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Conceptual grading plan shall be approved by the Building Official prior to recordation of Parcel Map. X 46. A Lot Line Adjustment modifying the shape of Parcel 1 of 7061 -2 shall be recorded prior to recording of any final map. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER �j By: RCE 20 li -/0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAPS 7061 -2 AND 7061 -3 WHEREAS, a request has been ':Ied for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2 of krdinance 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described tentative parcel maps on September 9, 1981. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following inaings: A. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time. B. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. C. That there has been no significant changes to the character of the area in which the project is located that would cause the project to become nonconforming or inconsistent with current standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time ext=_nsior: Parcel Map Applicant Expiration 7061 -2 Kaiser Development Co. September 9, 1985 7061 -3 Kaiser Development Co. September 9, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary 1 f�-�% I, Rick .Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f} - %oZ T. t '15 L] El _J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krali, Engineering Technician 1977 SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCE!_ MAP 6962 - KEY - Located on the north side of Vicara Drive at : Sper Street - APN 1051- 141 -06 Parcel Map 6962 was approved by Planning Commission on August 26, 1981 for the division of 2.07 acres of land into 4 parcels in the VL (2 du /ac) Residential Development District located on the north side of Vicara Drive, west of Jasper Street. Conditions of approval are attached for your review. A one -year extension was Sranted on August 26, 1983. This extension expires on August 26, 1984. Larry Key, owner, is now requesting an additional year extension. This extension, allowing a total period of 4 years, will be the last extension that can be granted. RECOMUMENDATION: It is recommended that a 12 -month extension be granted for Parcel Map 6952. The extension date will be August 26, 1985. This is the last_ extension that can be granted. lly su4nitted, :jaa Attachments ITEM 8 x i WANO10 Cuu 4 Ga, MU for s<s, ersn.rtpl, S i•T ••, TENTATIVE MAP PARCEL MAP N° 6962 ,.i�. DCYi\Tp4� .YLLLSD..•pCp- wi,ML ;SG2.. .4 e! 6DCD ,Y OaD<'l7�MCS G \u,D<26n .<¢<tL �^<. ,C«CDa O. S.Y bCwp,YG m\w\t"�i, <R aFC4yOPW. .niw..aD �v= MGY\ 191 w•w.•ae.o¢- ��y-�A ui��ngCW.e•w pTK IiGO \Jf.LLK40 <VL. Gl, <1 �O \GSM y CY \MO- CKwMYr Mtq ,T 41 <2 M1S I xo-•�: . 1. G<YYY,M1U rus/ O<YMT 1t,.04,T.r q Y.•1YU:f.O•K Y.W�C: CC�O i l� �.41:1r.C.�r•i J.v. W� L Vfw„ fsM�Lt: M cK Ctr N..n,O \Yr\• � 4ri1i �, .�Mi Y,MI W «(r•„ti AniY ••,n <rn.<f� w •fm•rw.i. ytr �N.�n FYG t,N�•y� 34� O.l. 22 1�� top Alm ZZ-12 jo is is, �� -aim- _ .�n.4.._: ��T- -�•i.- .3 4 < I t p�, .NL•la -4t0 p—� E 11 Ll OF RANCHO CUC- k%10 \GA ENGINEERING DIN71SION VICINITY INIaP i li� 'T title; P 1 11 j Pag` BARBARA KRALL • , .. .� . .� I would like ar. extension on my tentative map, As Iam not ready to build at this time. Tare already PAID the FEE as of aug 12, 1984 ORLIALLY,iY-OURS LARRY KEY i C El E n RESOLUTION NO. 31 -9:5 A RESOLUTION OF THE 9L4r1.41NG CO".FI.ISSIO N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6962 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6962) LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF VICARA AT JASPER STREET. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map `Dumber 6962, submitted by Larry Key and consisting of 4 parcels, located NiS Vicara at Jasper Street, being a division of parcel 3 of Parcel Map 3342 recorded in Book 33, Pages 61 and 62; and, WHEREAS, on June 24, 1981, a formal application was submitt ' requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 1981, the Planning Cowission held a duly advertised public hearing '_ `he above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: I. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements wil' not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project wil' not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on August 26, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Nap Nlo. 6962 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTEU FHIS 26Th DAY OF AUGUST, 1981. PLANViNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Resolution No- al( Page 2 i I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co-mission held on the 26th day of August, 1981, by the following vote - t0 -wi t: AYES: COrVISSIONERS NOES: CO'MISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS Dahl, Tolstoy, Remnpel, Sceranka, King None None El. 11 E r CITY OF RANCHO of CITY ENGLIEER`S.REPCRT i FILED BY: Larry Key TENTATIVE t ?AP NO. 6962 LOCATION: North side of Vicara at Jasper Street DATE FILED: 6124/81 NUMBER OF LOTS: 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 3 of Parcel MaD 3342 RECEIPT NUtiBER: 11839 recorded in Book 33. pages 61 and 62 FEE: 5250.00 ZONE: P,- 1,20,000 TE'VATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Jerry Wilson GROSS ACREAGE: 2.06 ADDRESS: 387 N_ 2nd Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: Upland. CA 91786 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RCE 20 .4 -7 ® RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE Larry Key 12601 Jaleneno Avenue 714/527 -4479 _ Chino, CA 91710 REPORT OF THE CITY Ei�GI`�EER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easerents as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 30 additional feet or. Vicara various widths on Jasper additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other _ 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as folloti•1s: 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: _ 6. The follotirirg perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 .4 -7 T7 %TATIVE r4A.P r10. -fia2 Page 2 Aaft Ir!n rpl'e ^:.ent5 rn ) toonding is reauired prior toZIRecordina for Vicara El Building permit for Jasper ) 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter. A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street sights) on all interior streets. x_ S. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *inrIutiirn 7inric ron <..n e'A STREET 'rAr'E CURB & I GJTTER A.C_ i PVr•.T_ SIDE- I KALv -J •v•• DRIVE APPP,_ -- '�1111G I STREET TREES STREET I { LIGHTS I MEDIAN I ISLA:D *I OTKER Vicara X I X r X i i i I I 1 I 9. Construct all story: drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. _X_ 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, oas, telephone and cable television. conduit. All utilities are to be underground. X_ 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. V.12. install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer- )c 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. _X_ 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _x 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. i6. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 37. The ro owing specific dimensions, i.e., cup -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The following existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 TENITATIVE MAP NO. 6462 Page 3 x_ 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follo:•:s: _ A. Caltrans, for: _ B. City: _ C. County Dust Abatement District: _ D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: _ E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control _ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first pha;a .: ubdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shall be sho:•rn to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. ® Parcel "gap Waiver 23. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to 0 Recording for 0 Building permit for } 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under side -Walks through culverts. 31. If water surface is above tor) of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: _ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will be required to, assess iripact or increased runoff. X 34. The site shall be rough graded per conceptual grading plan,prior to recordation of map. RCE 20 ,R_ U t TENTATIVE MAP 1410. 6462 i Page 4 Miscellaneous _ 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. _ 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. _ 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 33. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: y_ 34. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta -' tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for th^ follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division.. --y — 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. 1.1hen building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County 1-later District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. . --.X._ 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66435(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in w:ritina of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X_ 43. At the time of Final Flap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Local and Master Plasm ed Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City equestrian trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA7.10NGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: . 1 RCE 20 /4 -/n RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 6962 WHEREAS, a. request ha: been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2 of Ordinance 28 -8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described tentative parcel map on August 26, 1981. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following endings: A. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time. S. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. C. That there has been no significant changes to the character of the are, in which the project is located that would cause the project to become nonconforming or inconsistent with current standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Parcel Mao Applicant Expiration 6962 Larry Key August 26, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary Ll // I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretar., of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga., do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution.was duly and ®, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA22VIONGA STAFF REPORT F :J li DATE: September 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Patrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10210 - FORECAST MORTGAGE CORFORATION - A custom lot residential subdivision of 16 acres intq 33 lots i❑ the iiiiiside Residential District, generally located on the north side of Almond, between 2apphire and Turquoise - APN 200 -061- 12; 200 - 051 -06, 07; 1061 - 172 -03. I. BACKGROU140: The applicant is requesting a time extension for Tentative Tract 10210, as described above. This is the second request for a time extension. On August 10, 1983, the Planning Commission approved the time extension for Tentative Tract 10210 for a twelve (12) month period. Thus, the current expiration date is September 23, 1984. II. ANALYSIS: Tentative tracts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are valid for a maximum of four years, with appropriate extensions per the Subdivision Map Act. The subject tract was originally approved for twenty -four (24) months and given an extension for twelve (12) months, thus a twelve (12) month extension period remains. The applicant has stated that he expects final execution of requisite easements from the Los Angeles City Department of Water and Power within the next sixty (60) days (October). A review of Resolu':ion No. 81 -106. conditionally approving Tentative Tract Map 102210, indicates that the Planning Commission finding: conform to the current development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. A twelve - -month extension appears to be sufficient time in order to achieve the above. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Time Extension for TT 10210 - Forecast Page 2 II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a twelve -month extension for Tentative Tract 10210 to expire September 23, 1985. 1 W submitted, V R ck 13d itv ,P1 :DP:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tract Map Exhibit "C' - LeUt!r from Applicant Resolution of Approval E 11 � -a C O R i 0 R A T 1 ON Construction /Development August 8, 1984 Citv of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline, Suite "C" P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Attention: Curt Johnston Dear Curt: We would like to request an extention of Tentative Tract Map rl0210. All final engineering on tai s subdivision has been completed and approved by your city. We are, however, awaiting final execution of requisite easements by the Los Angeles City Derartment of Water and Power. We have been waiting 15 months for these easements and expect the receipt of them within 60 days. Please call me at (619) 729 -1238 if you have a.-iv questions or comments regarding this request. Sincerely, Bart Lefferdink Vice President, Development BLIC-w 9333 Baseline Road • Suite 290 • Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 71-:- 987 -7788 C-3 s E (2—# \ORTI i CI'II y i)F RA NCHTO C C- ( 1. ]` lJ- 'A TITI _r i.' C TI Q(s PL:t\ \L \C, DIVISION EX:IIBIT: " A To Sf{K� SC I, E:h�+aT (2—# C E NO �AT /O NFL FO 3 I BEST M—e 1 K n 1 `1a a 1n • ')J r .N I 7 » > 1c iM p � v r • Of:+t bPit(c .Z1 T ` 1 \ • Y tJ Lf • ` .L •4 M < 2w • � � ) .< M � uL V •a I 1 LSL1 N— at Li M-1 V A G% N T 1 V 4GAr. T SL ZD 7 OPt:N 4 /4LE LOT A G A N T K -1 -207x! f:N6LC F^M\L.`f CLL\OCNCE rta -7z CIT Y OF irrm- Zt O RANCHO CUCAMONGA T,,E: PL INTINIl \G DIVISION F- XHIFitT- '%F� scku- is or -ro Serf- �'s RESOLUTION NO. 81 -1060A 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCANMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION" APPROVING THE EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10210, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALMOND, BETWEEN SAPPHIRE AND TURQUOISE WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -3, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described Tentative Tract Map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the Tract at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: TRACT APPLICANT EXPIRATION 10210 Forecast Mortgage September 23, 1984 APPROVED AND ADOIrTED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1983. COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dennis L. )toy• na,Traau ATTEST: -= ®► Secretary of the Planning L11fT:STr C —& Resolution No. 81 -106PF Page 2 C ti I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Lommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of August, 19S3, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, REh1PEL, JUAREZ, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: CO'rMISSIONERS: NONNE ABSENT: C014MISSIONERS: NONE u RESOLUTION NO. 31 -I06 C A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIiiG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. COIDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10210 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10210, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lawlor Enterprises, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San. Bernardino, State of California, described as approximately 46 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Sapphire and Almond and being divided for singe famiiy use into 37 lots, regularly came aefore the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on September 23, 1981; and I.IHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject_ to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planninq Commission of the City of Rancho CCucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Trac` No. 10210 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvemen w of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of develop- ment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the pr000sed subdivision. C r ;1 CJ M Resolution No. 21� ^6 Pdqe 2 (g) That this project aill not create adverse irvoacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10210, a copy of which is attached 'hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the folloti:inq_ conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All necessary easements for cross lot drainage shall be shown on final map and grading plan. 2. All requirements of the Foothill Fire Protection District such as, but not limited to, fifty foot clearance of flamable material around all units, fire retardant building materials, appropriate water supply and fire lane to Turquoise, shall be met. In the removal of flammable material, inflammable material should be planted. 3. Construction of a new forest service road shall be done in conformance with conditions set forth by the Forest Seraice. 4. Full compliance with the State Alquist - Priolo Act is required for construction and placement of dwellings. 5. Full compliance with the Cucamonga County Water District for construction of the water system, is required. 6. The forest service easement shall be extended to the eastern edge of the property, north and adjacent to this tract. 7. Equestrian access to open spaces s ^all be provided where feasible. 3. The applicant shall work with the utility companies having easements over the subject property, to develop the easement areas for useable open space, such as an equestrian staging area. A detailed plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to recordation of map. ENGINEERING DIVISION 9. Installation of an adequate concrete lined interceptor drain across the southeasterly project area as shown on the tentative map shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The drain shall be extended south- westerly to connect to the existing Almond interceptor drain. The storm drain fees for the project shall be credited towards the cost of this drain. Lr' I CI I I Pagc 3 {r i 10. All required on -site and off -site ease -en, for the drain shall be dedicated to the City. The easement shall be extended northeasterly along the Edison easement line to the easterlymost tract boundary. 11. A flood protection berm and /or a channel shall be pro- vided along the north lot lines of Juts i6, 17, 18, 30, 31, 32, 33 and 34, diverting storm runoff to a safe disposal area. 12. Construction of Almond Street improvements with curb, gutter, 25' wide asphalt concrete pavement, A.C. berm along south side, and street lights within a dedicated easement shall be required from the east tract boundary to Sapphire Street. 13. Emergency access road per Foothill Fire District's requirements shall be provided along Almond Street to Turquoise Street. 14. All conditions contained in the lette by the Forest United States 5460 Schulhr,DedatedeJuno22, 'Agriculture shall be complied with. The existing Big Tree Road shall be vacated prior to recordation of the map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, '981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI 01' RANCHO CUCAMONGA lI [•ICI ATT9 T.-•`J L � /I L I Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resol;.tion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning ComnmiSsion held on the 23rd day of September, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: L C -/o Resolution No. 21 ��6 Paae 4 +DES= COINMiSSIO"ERS: Sceran;;a, cnl , Rempel NOES: COM.".1ISSIONERS: Tolstoy ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAINED: CO'DIISSIONERS: King m l.� `•f f _ 4 _ 4 u R •• V - C J ` ' n U :ov u ✓ 2 ` G _ C L 4 7 V r � q u • G �= _� r. C G .n.. � C� V _ C _ _ J r✓ C U ' ✓ N J _ r VV6 CO 7 — �Gn n` CO C O'er u O'JC C 7 j� „ r OOip C -✓ O }� C O G V y — U O O C •1 C .+ � i _V V r L4.J 17 CO D� 9 r ^ q u O L V V Gu �r- 4 ✓ ._L P.,,. O'• r O r q ` L = P 'V G _ r v 6 U T_ 6 O W �.• D % V P r �• U l ' a �V �_� S 4 POLO O �. u.L. 4 E ° O•_i•_t .• q — cGOC v•L .L..li o4 6. —o =l o oL aY G mLir JOE L aco 7tU Oa ~•C �— M� N L ?+N'�U L`Ep y uP ..N.O F l O C O L O r • t� C V✓ 1_ JS O C V CG y O O 6� O = • C VUL' C C eV .—.• Cu C.O..r� ✓C C� L•�+V 7 `V O y— U r 9 O T.n NI O V r u� O VGU O M� 66 •_ rV`uyu ¢I C—T .n? ?9 L L r R C d � v _ C 2 - C N V C C 9 r G d � y l L G N n •j 4 C �� w F L O= G U 5 C V O V V q �_ C •CjG 9 r.,7 rn r V J L �.V.r P e — •O+O N Nd U✓ V rGDC L r— a prj 4r0 O- C 4017 =Ln N r 9 N .I Cw• Np Q9 �/Oi0 N GM u��2 �2 W� W�r 9�V rV NSu HOC r �VVL2 _I y N •y _ +i —I a! I o Ij o� cd �o arc co Ln� y L C j L �r OC I1 t N � �r V •'. t� O Z.5 u V •} C✓ d 9 4. G N q L .Lip P 4 C O 9 6 G V O = V L C L L. T � 4 En Y ✓— C � C� G r V G '-• ua r p =o Lo _� � °= >' _oN Y .L.P L..9c _'n cbi=• �_o 3 O 4 CO C N` P Y C L1 `E 'J 6 S N O O. p9 d d •> O l C p V V 9 6 r ` V N`� 9 b V C Y. O •L... �V 1 �C 6b 9C- u d� �N ✓P �V O =Cy VJ J a W V ZO II V NG Na L O O �_ � 2. > V C E 9i v> � GC j E ✓ 9 �.•�� E r CZ) j 1 ✓✓ V P_ ��4 Y O— C NV O �~^ qy �p .•N 9 c 69 CLd 9 O NOL •On _ v c y V _ nu C96 O d�cR a V� c� r.3r• uS L O r O � O 90. =T � � � fr O ` 9V C 9�� N6 c' ✓ �9V c •.� V t O O V O )`Y O �� w u L u_ t L V> `_ L V ✓ L O_ 4 6 r =. D G O C O E= V 0 � N V (S C I 0 0 L✓ M C r p 9 p r = N V_ V V � ' CI _ n G •yl Qi ` 9� C V l 6 N 9 4 D V O r O r L L V Q N u C C O ~� ♦ L I r0 y _ V _V V u 7� V .n G ` r t ~ C > O U - L n L i� e P> \ O O 2 _ ✓ �_ > p � y _ r V ' L N C �"� N v G d C O `� 4 r VAC '4 Lr - q y N L • p �I ur OC u C C'_ 49 u —q N� r]V u r S t N L O NAM F V� 6^ C L V 6 L •J L L N -J Y V 9 T C O OL �' ✓ 7 �L'GL. 4 e uy r q > N r L L C G CG• V J �al� 'O 9 (::> LLr O d a y C•Vi CuC WC w GN C l C� Cllfrl S rOr_ O ~O CL MY L' G rNb� w CI 1 �✓ > Y V ^_ rt D ._�-'� Nr "', I I — N.. C Nr q •J G L O: 1] •[ ✓w y' r >N 6V O Vd % =l L C •- C C ✓ y � _ V y r. r J` O r N n O N �p 0 P • O M I t i _ in> .°• __° __ ✓G "�` ° ° P L7 `o r'r'o` I o ._ ,-�u'o Ai •- .J uae � °c �v - ?^ v � „�I o° •A.A o I° IL .. °N N° .L/ V 4 ° ? '' C l d� r •- � � L� E V F O L` � 9 L _p r G O V � J✓ p M Uv9 � >N 'L OY w M r� °L�• �L, n � 4 ICOL OV O V A ..' N N> ._-�� u L •� V {li y C °. G A O � I T V <] - '� V° .• C J L > V c�: IrYJ dP•°. co ° �I i z BCD o Nn .•y I y o_;_ ✓Y-° .) = ___7 NL � =« ✓)= Y Y AC 7'J L P I '� <x f0�'Aq �M to nt✓ G emu._ •„ r7n a NI < <V v` ? WOj c ..r � _ = gun =PO c- �� .'-. °31 C_✓ ?N c IL �c '^ � `n v�o ��on �. .,.o c.V r N� .+•' ° - ° p`.: �r � S :c > °,:c c c�-o �- T or -_ A.-o` - <� j �� U V✓ T�� J A n N O CI V O� U L V C V V ° J V P h C r = -_ 6 V f✓ O � AI rSr -GA NO °�iVV S�.nn6 C � � W L O 9 E O •Ai a^ L O_ j i O T v n C d 'i VL � A q_r A•.CVLj ✓ey '� a• LV G�LgOn � N La Pr q`p -,n✓ A ' C.• C 7�L0✓O4V = =p Z-E q9 -L `L q 4_3N 2t c C4 12 C a 07 C= •_ ° L V ry - ' V U r M G V _0. •°L y L L L r p t V 1 4� N V N G l O Cy C� y �l �� G pN�rCEpa� 9VO •JN G. >n JOC+L TVA aL ,On 4j n Y --� �v�e r7 C�_L 4q p�L� lOV = 'P19C1✓L✓ A•.' r•Li t C y E n ? �V 7 S e. V O N r O n V✓ V a u v t V �• L_ C r O -- C V V 6 E E r O .n` -JC 6d L °n Y N A VC CG v�LO yTL CVV 04 9G V 9 r CA _ ✓O C� `w 6�Lr CN' dQ '-O � ? - nC Orroc.- V 0En m� hG~ 7 N ° ^�O 'O •)t 40V �•��_ Ca dH AV��LV E G✓ n9 r r Q _ _ �U 6 V jL _ O_. n,'�L•Jl Ar qr r r c •• - _J c c J 'J Y j L L B O C 1° ✓ - •Li c .-.. - u c' .°. O ✓• . ✓o o L °_ nu :• -_ °--'> .L: ,,, "c - _4 c -A NrdJ w_ °•°_. o -•'„°, o� ``.o - N p O � y N N C O j O •1 ° O j= y C -___ V C 9 _ C¢ A V r - � �> O V. � � >�l CCU .n .-..rr 6n1 L _ �O.• AG JNL CN ��N .LJO Viu L > •N.r ✓V '>a 4 _. J.°u Ll L -V•'O -O n� NLL VA✓�C 00„V -Jr L L- r_ ^ C ` V >. .f •J ✓^ N t N r 0 V G l' N o �° c n ^J q •. .L. ° i =° c u u^ o o `> v i 1a O J? r _ _° C Zr' C - C C c �uY VIM -� PO_� •_N�. -__± E 7 N� `✓ yOV�- -N� J•a. G-'NV G p P VVr LN a 9� _p� V uQC y• C = La'AY�T` CV - ._ no �� ✓r„� NYC e u e_.o �^ " _ate � °p ✓« < .:. o� < c o C i.°` �� o � e � �:. i.". m.`•�o �.J�3 a aT �= -d-°'� L - °_b �r _° [ C C NA M cwC. CO C;P6- nwt_OL CLOG 0 E E. u L � C L �EOr-J- .�% o o u u ^ -• O Y _ r ✓ O �� e• d n O ✓ V G j O ✓ E�vN ✓crop o =4-%o uN =pr �GnG -TN ^L -u LC =r4 G_ r O ✓ i y ^ L _ L ✓�> y C r= r ... yO C S r j C V O `tL4rr N Q C q + C 3>_ O A C ✓_ = r V L 2 J 7 y L Y .p x 1 O C � ✓ O G r c C C G C C G _ C V A N C N i L C r` �6 ` y V C C C T `J r TS Y c Y ? O n C O = C - = c > S V 7 G a ��N N C O F M C C 7 X � CO✓ t] VSN r V >L V A r PV •� J_ ✓ O N C .r � V '^ w O V. .r.• O o-u'vu mb CCW d � O O q V aoYGV u' ac� 9 ✓� 6 T SV r V= V C L`_V LOI NPN L._ `Y- q c C r V P J O a � L6rJ [= NI c V _ � c. uq� 0 7G of � °.' °'°.(N Y__ _ ✓c _ � a V cv NI V V C -s P l � � O _ - _i S _-• C A � A V V m • L __ _ _ � A C •� D V A_ > � � �.._ C_ O N C• C _ G __ G _ C r C V L N G "J N C C O✓ V V O O� wl rT DO ✓ j Oq0 ._. O�jO ��7 C��rE VUL� '`-N S N "i .J ✓ YN V O r✓ G O V ra N 6 � � _ ... �! NI _ .Nn O L V✓✓ C EL✓ N` C` � A C r 6 ✓ A�✓ X 0 0 q i�✓ A �_ D .3 V O V� ✓ G A✓ � S O N ^� O V N C C I =c L � C> t u Y� i ` = o V � •-lCv ✓ _ V � > N V N O .O+ < V O p 1r �• v r_ qr^ N•V" C. 7 A V JG�V < N .q ✓ V' Q A L V S d V=i .^ 0 0 c X� xj XI XI ✓a ul 1 _ u L � C L �EOr-J- .�% o o u u ^ -• O Y _ r ✓ O �� e• d n O ✓ V G j O ✓ E�vN ✓crop o =4-%o uN =pr �GnG -TN ^L -u LC =r4 G_ r O ✓ i y ^ L _ L ✓�> y C r= r ... yO C S r j C V O `tL4rr N Q C q + C 3>_ O A C ✓_ = r V L 2 J 7 y L Y .p x 1 O C � ✓ O G r c C C G C C G _ C V A N C N i L C r` �6 ` y V C C C T `J r TS Y c Y ? O n C O = C - = c > S V 7 G a ��N N C O F M C C 7 X � n r-. � v n V d G_ Vw 9- n N g T C O L L Ic q u O N 2= NO C N Ir u > Vr CG =OV v ✓ c r ✓r-J G ter+ J V � T ✓ Ov V C � � G JS Jf x� T ujQ M L 6 � r S 7 T6 2✓ a c c••'rq i N O V P ` IOdr 6 C P w S ✓ _ V C ' a a A j A "• V G. q V ✓ �u ✓ ✓-=vim O 9J J r a r _ CL u y6 s N r O d u v O C C q i E v 0 V v O A E N p ° r G •� NV F•L ; 1 i -J 1 J V O p O Y C i r✓ v _ S _ L > O U N N iV <q 4 O. N p 4 C� Cnr V CO r O C � O �V c 4 -J C 2 v _ C a�O A S L 00 S N O O cr � q O S ✓ cv� C OO 1 1 II 1 ` _ C J ^G P C r C � Z V A y L o-G•v Gro v PVC L � O N L u NS L r d d y > O O O n ¢y� O S V C V O O V A � C •�• CO T7 Cj VG 1 O A O r ✓ N P C `N OS o� V O 2 PN r SC GO Y V o _ C •s L 4 C S V y q r dN �✓ q « G e �o c a P z;f> N ✓ N C -/j M G V C z v� � m j E V ` O u� 4 c D A r O V N P uc V O. q v a c v n _ r u 2 N V W M CO✓ t] VSN r V >L V A r PV •� J_ ✓ O N C .r � V '^ w O V. .r.• O o-u'vu mb CCW d � O O q V aoYGV u' ac� 9 ✓� 6 T SV r V= V C L`_V LOI NPN L._ `Y- q C r V P J O a p`YC L6rJ [= NI V _ V cv NI n r-. � v n V d G_ Vw 9- n N g T C O L L Ic q u O N 2= NO C N Ir u > Vr CG =OV v ✓ c r ✓r-J G ter+ J V � T ✓ Ov V C � � G JS Jf x� T ujQ M L 6 � r S 7 T6 2✓ a c c••'rq i N O V P ` IOdr 6 C P w S ✓ _ V C ' a a A j A "• V G. q V ✓ �u ✓ ✓-=vim O 9J J r a r _ CL u y6 s N r O d u v O C C q i E v 0 V v O A E N p ° r G •� NV F•L ; 1 i -J 1 J V O p O Y C i r✓ v _ S _ L > O U N N iV <q 4 O. N p 4 C� Cnr V CO r O C � O �V c 4 -J C 2 v _ C a�O A S L 00 S N O O cr � q O S ✓ cv� C OO 1 1 II 1 ` _ C J ^G P C r C � Z V A y L o-G•v Gro v PVC L � O N L u NS L r d d y > O O O n ¢y� O S V C V O O V A � C •�• CO T7 Cj VG 1 O A O r ✓ N P C `N OS o� V O 2 PN r SC GO Y V o _ C •s L 4 C S V y q r dN �✓ q « G e �o c a P z;f> N ✓ N C -/j M G V C z v� � m j E V ` O u� 4 c D A r O V N P uc V O. q v a c v n _ r u 2 N V W M ti Cy VL Ga 21 zol 2 Z3 I CE cc; zg 2-4 2 ff 72 -Z' L uV ez" F- 77- a LO [n Cr9C 7-'1 —E 142 2! z 'a 2.t Z, Z ti Cy VL Ga ¢ 2 t z u G C r ~ L 9 V 4 ^ 9 L y V � � O 4 ri V O r C LL V �E[ u ^ T N N L L d r C C O •� 43 •� n�F G 4 _u c ` n- a � u 2 r 4 r H G uQ V Lu r _ c F V r r V U V rcc V L G r p C �I ..OrO ' C_ 4�¢ L "oL O� jd L C� O o ° c ° V C O 4a o 0 nCJ� v C ^ L VAN O ilXl� C -i Ln C r ~ L 9 V LVr y VO � � O 4 ri V O h n q ^ T N N L y C d r C C O •� d C G n L V n- a � r H G l r V r r V U ..OrO ' C_ L "oL O� jd NOVI C� r `� O 9 x`O ' n C ✓ C.V 1 L' TJJ C•V Y _GiJ 0 O � L` Oq� L OO TL �NOL LT. ✓ N .� u L V V= y V L .+ M t. 9 9 L L �[ L E r rJ C •" r L` C �I �! xl 1 C -i Ln ... a E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLA^;tiING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 1021C WHEREAS, a request has beep filed for a time extension for the above - described pro;;ect, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 or Ordinance 20 -, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Conanission contitionally approved *.ha above - described tentative tract map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 'las made the following findings: A. Th;` prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the tentative tract map at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of t;ie Development Code. ® D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental co the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially in,:urious to properties or 'improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2• time extension for: Tract 10210 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a ADOlicant Forecast Mortgage Expiration September 23, 1955 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING CO "ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NGA 6Y Dennis L. Sto>>t, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary `- L - Resolution No. Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning :ommission of the C;ty of Rancho -acamonga, do hereby certify that the forego=,ng Res�jluticn was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the P:a:-;,ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Col -lission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -V. wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSiOifERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �•J 11 E 11 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RAINC130 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 12, 1984 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, City Planner Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner TIME EXTENS DEVELOPMENT - A resident acres of land in the south of banyan Street, 201 - 251 -63 and 64. 1977, `flHI1YL IKHI.I 1VU14 - L1U1'771YLK ial subdivision of 1�' lots on 6.9 Luw Residential District located east of Archibald Avenue - APN I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a time extension for Tentative Tract 1007E as described above. The applicant has recently purchased the property and is requesting an extension to pursue completion. On August 25, 1982, the Planning Commission, approved Tract 10076 for a period of two years (expires August 25, 1984). II. ANALYSIS: The requested time extension. for Tract 10076 is the first extension requested for the tract map. Two items of concern relative to this time extension are: (1) conformance with current development standards; and (2) appropriate le,oith cf the time extension. A review of Resolution No. 82-8i, conditionally approving Tentative Tract ;dap 10076, indicates that the Planning Commission findings confo :'+a to the current development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. The City's policy is to allow a four appropriate extensions. The Commission m extension up to maximum eighteen months. owners require further time in order to map, a twelve (12) month time extension time in order to accomplish finalization. year approval with the ay grant any increment of Since the new property complete the final tract appears to be sufficient ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Time Extension for TT 10076 - Lightner Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a twelve (12) month time extension for Tentative Tract 10076 to expire August 25, 198C. submitted, DP:ns Attachments: Exnibit OW - Erhib it °B° - EExhibit "C" - Resolution of Locati ^r, Map Tract :.) Letter from Applicant Approval 00-� `- C 11 E U LIGH 17NI ER DEVELOPMENT & CONTRACTINIG- ; �.:.: August 21, 1984 Mr. Rick Gomez Plarning Director City of Rancho Cucamconga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Gomez: AU: _ nn Lightner Development is requesting an extention of time for Tentative Tract '10076. Our records indicate that the current expiration date is August 25, 1984_ We are requesting the extention of time because we have just recently purchased the property and are anxious to pursu= completion of it. Please contact me if you have any questions or naed further information. Thank you, r Geer � '" _ Lightner Lightner Develop:,ient GHLIao'c 1365 West Foothill Boulevard • Suite 6 • UplanC, California 91786 • (714) 9462617 COMM tic. Ho. 8329768 0-a ICI �yy O� :OI H ° ' r Q o '° z0 v O,(�• +: •� J1 L �T .r O G.r 7�N OCLN�Q.pINp �L000 GO�iT iioL ->. al lL'p DG .TY- JZ s,. x zowal, - ¢ Z.(=, 000 LOw DC S,TY �'•,� 'rte_ i is epo�i•'•'• � _ -- /� E'y� 1 O, Az p I - 0 o� c a NORTHV NORTH CITY OF imi: Tom. 1-007,_ RANCHO CL'Cr1N"ONGA TITLE: t—OCANDO -MAP PLANNING DIETISnN EXHIBIT: Q -y 11 I. t jII t I 11 Ir y BOC K 20•f'� -/ 0, yes ` 10o4i C? O h• C „ - J M CAP Y � 0 o� c a NORTHV NORTH CITY OF imi: Tom. 1-007,_ RANCHO CL'Cr1N"ONGA TITLE: t—OCANDO -MAP PLANNING DIETISnN EXHIBIT: Q -y 11 I. me ; 0 o� c a NORTHV NORTH CITY OF imi: Tom. 1-007,_ RANCHO CL'Cr1N"ONGA TITLE: t—OCANDO -MAP PLANNING DIETISnN EXHIBIT: Q -y 11 I. El 11 ttOTC Tayai.TK'4 SO .�C'•' L T 1 {� Y 5 14 V4i 'IT Or "GT 4YlI�M NLa. • MAP TRACT N210076- �cmitCf � " "i M4N pASi1NI )- •cr �. rw-_ l¢Y ?b+ear4 TCKT +a :,rzc � �. e•KOCa -, er s.. nc�Y ts.u, nor ne+ teerse m..oe) .«rz cwcYRYU re..waor GON4!v T7 v V .YO G04NA M. 9ONAN NO JALWILM- CIVIL ENGINEER rIM. . "r Al a.vp ql Y .,M1YYL `:NI M ^i.n: iMtAYO. C[ T1K j pLL)- le�zeew loF�pl AUGUST, IM 13 9 [pv�:�✓t, w6L 1 1 I 9 ttOTC Tayai.TK'4 SO .�C'•' L T 1 {� Y 5 1,y�7 r,r•.va I a � " "i M4N pASi1NI )- il< (rSeo: j (Kbul dc.cL� I loF�pl (O?"7 13 9 1 1 •d� 10 I 9 ttOTC Tayai.TK'4 SO .�C'•' L T 1 {� Y 5 i4 ' t5 !6 1 17 78 L,,,007 � (z9e) � V•.v�) � tYya. � (.iOpY) - pYw.:c unr.aY.r .a c.G u a �i • r �— Z \ 3 2p 1 M J al �• y u) 19 r'lia.YO �� \ L� V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: - --z. 10076 RA`('-HO CL.CANMU 'GA TITLE `i`T'4LT" MAC PL kNN NG DINTSION EXHIBIT: V13111 .. SCALE - AE�L-E ,0- s 1,y�7 r,r•.va I a � " "i M4N pASi1NI )- (rSeo: j (Kbul dc.cL� I loF�pl (O?"7 13 9 1 1 •d� 10 I 9 i4 ' t5 !6 1 17 78 L,,,007 � (z9e) � V•.v�) � tYya. � (.iOpY) - pYw.:c unr.aY.r .a c.G u a �i • r �— Z \ 3 2p 1 M J al �• y u) 19 r'lia.YO �� \ L� V NORTH CITY OF ITEM: - --z. 10076 RA`('-HO CL.CANMU 'GA TITLE `i`T'4LT" MAC PL kNN NG DINTSION EXHIBIT: V13111 .. SCALE - AE�L-E ,0- s RESOI UT . , .1 NO. °2 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION • ^.F THE CITY OF RANCH" CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, MIXITIONALLY APPROVITNG TENTATIVE TRA CT "" NO. 10073 , ,. D 11HEP.EAS, Tentative Traa f ;ap NO 10376, hereinafter "flap,, submitted by J..l_ Wilson. Civil Engineer, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City ;f Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential tract subdiv ;ion on 6.9 acres of land in *ha R -1- 20,000 zone (R- 1- iC,!00 pending), located south of Banyan Street, -ast of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 251 -63 and 64 into 19 lots, regularly came before the Plannina Commission for public hearing and action on August 25, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the ;;ao subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and IaHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. ::041, THEREFORE, the Planning Commissicn if the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECT.IO% 1: The Planning Commission; makes the following findings in regard tc Tea'_�tive Tract No. 10076 and the flap thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with 311 applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de- velopment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial envir:mmental damage and avoidable injur; to hunans and wi:dl'ife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is rot likely to cause serious public health prcb'ems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict witi, any easement acquired by the pcalzc at large, now of record, for access through or use bf.the property •<ithin the proposed subdivision. IM Reso 1 ut/ .10. 52 -31 Pare 2 (g) That this Project will not create adverse imnacts cn the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTIO': 2: Tentative Tract hap No. 10076, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the followino conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A minimum twelve (12) foot landscape rzrkway to ;rclude trees, shrubs, ground cover, and irri- gation shall be provided along the east side of Banyan Street through the PUD right -cf -way. ENGI ?JEERING DIVISION 2. Installation of an improved concrete channel for Alta Loma watercourse from the existing spillway structure to South tact boundary including outlet structures shat; :e required. The cost of the channel shall be credited to the storm c:rain fees for the oroject and a reimbursement agreement will be executed in conformance :•:ith the City Ordinance NO. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the amount of these fees. This requirement may be waived if and when Alta Lcma Channel Assessment District is formed. 3. A letter from Flood Control District accepting the design of the channel and ad?quacy of the- right-of-way width shall be obtained prior to recordation of the map. The applicant shall meet_ all the requirements of Vie Flood Control District for this channel construction. 4. Tic- portion of the existing Banyan Street shall be reconstructed to provide a smooth conr,�ction to London Avenue to the satisfaction rf the City Engineer. 5. The final design of Mandarin Street shall provide a four -foot parkway at the end of the temporary cul- de -sac. 6. If a General Plan Amendment is approved t) discontinue Banyan Street or to realign it to 'a diffe °ent location, the applicant shall redesign Mandarin Street to provide a standard, regular cul -de -sac. D -"-/ Tr IN Resolution No. 82 -81 Page 3 El A DROVIED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH. DAY OF AUGUST, 1482, PLANPiING CO?•iMISSiOi! OF THE CITY OF RINCHO CUCAMONGA BY: . uef °re, King, 3Chat Tan ATTEST: f ! 1 Y OT the PlarninF ?____ ?55jp;, I, SACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commis--ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution has duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reac'ar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of August, 1582, by the following vote to -wit: AYES_ CC "*:tIS5IONERS: Rempei, Stout, Barker, NcNiel, Ping NOES: CO:-7•tISSIC`E'RS: ']one ABSE:'iT: C0NA-11iSSIOi:EFS: None LC",0 J .-1 r V r V V v L• ° V — w V_ i - O L Jt CC L N CTy�V .nO � N r O �. _� •r - � � ^ —^ � _ � '� � V - w �u .<i1 �V S r_ J.�.n - <.•C -- O'J V 09N U CC ^ r _ LI _ C ` Y ] 7 L _ V 'O L Cry r _ •L ZZ Z� NLL Zq V _ L rc•.- �O � _ 7G Z O NN K 1 I I O I g = I.e C T _V V �•°• °w jv v �o Gd << q-J �° oG� c_c oy c r _.. y..c v- � -z' P rY =•-a 0. N'J.L r U_Up C p q r .—E •� . _ •r O G`L V Q Vr =—i � _ _ >Y. VCL C1 °^ L r-J MO O „LU � rt _JO S Ur =0 Z r •. _ _ _ � .n N V V d_ G�` �� L V [1 L '] •. w w O U T ti N ^� A N V L •/�� ."� V .G... M r� V`! JJii •J v �� „wG OPO 0= V�= O .. m T < S� Lrr _'y G L P V a � OL• -....i ___1 r � � cq �� ''� UI rr O~•a EV tG�N qG Vti � L L n 1qG •n: f .. V _I N.^ _O— <� a.>•n rOC Z� Gca �.� •/�`�rM 9 •_ ��. .-1 .I L J J - V ouq - L d .. �� oc`• a -L C � .o. = u o u �q i- o'- - - - c_L id-, -, 4 =- -�3 rL r•u y � 11 __ ou ° I to ',' � _. � -.. r, ``> cr r'_r Y -�- `� � C V � _ t� �L•� -JL� O I-1L 3 = � � -L =v OC> IV _V Cw bU0 O_ dL -Ji w :I L =G � O _. I.n _.. 4lrL �- °V• � � 1� `�' Cz G =r :.1 t � r�J -u +•3 r h� � _ %2r - c Fr _q. V•e .terry _c � rC LC -� � .c iS•.".= -.ow IC. r G SL <60 r 9 .i4 uJ. ,_V L _•'.� Y L _ O c W � L V O 4 2 V t _- •a 9 w C �i V r te? a w O �' G �- _ r r 2. - q w V E `G � ` O U L _ G i� 7 w L = y a. l� L L i � !� >. 4 9 C v -+• 4 G< r �� r_ 4 e c: _ ao or.�o� d oR •� _ c ._ eL _r. C• V -C - _r.r.. _ -4 N•'fC P .�� 9N L -FC d" r~ L O L[ _car 6. -Gco` 4 -J C ^ 9 � C q � N '1 d •` r .r. r q V V 7 r L I"• V >� O' C V 6 O Y L „] l_ 1_f L r V .--� -]• O r- G- r = n n = G .2 7 _ O F G j< ' q r �. C rrJ vqO -OEc9 G -- O 'J L L L~ 9 V > O r 9 C .n wGG - - O_ _~CO •'iG �y!�MC.O.rP = -_ -J iC � V "'.O J` =C- `_O 4 �? w L _a �P .••w4 ^O rOM ?c O Crr 4.n Y� - 7a >` -• - n w � - -_ =vu =c - - -b_� ___ C_ +ro —rx,. —o... cv_ cyd - l N • -_ � L. r � U _ � � - - � T r �' � C_1 O 4 q ' L. 4 ✓ C1 C C V q .>.� = ` �. L r_ _ w• V :. _ _ _ cr Lam_ »•' " __ y : ° ray q�.`o `_�-:- -r. !i Vim_ - � C S � ` V_ j r _ rr- .n �_ l� q C• i ` � n �_ �. I � I T S - ac_ c °_ rc. _ w_ , -_ i• �� OO P _ - __ y.c I _ u I •`J^ :7 •-i q L ` q V 4 .2: O _ 'J C r •, � C. C V L l _ .+ _ J N r l � !+ 1� r_ j '^v'> .oN q_- .°. V'� •_ c -n n v o wb� - � 3 _ � _ � �i [ a ° coo �'. -� 1 � lP` .�. .'. " - t ° d ° mo o r V c r e m _..o c �� !' u � � ` e -• u q L' � N GJ r_ JO L qrr Jq'• `'9L bqd � �G CI _U d V v � I I G� V V � � �- .O.r y ~ » � � l O � C r � _ O - O _ V V O • y � 4 _ _ � r .� -•'. y 3 ._ ... G � '' � +G•. O d CV+ G M '� r C. J i 4 �' .fI 7 _ L S t � 1! l u _ u. y O y S .J 4 u _'1Ca C' 9 t O Vw .V,^. L. L..1V G' •JET OUPj �q w. _` •j _ - G _ I V ` C- O V� Y� Y b rr � L Y S •- r L q T y V 'n 4 •• r' 3 G _ c � -> n✓ =_ mac:.: o c .r. q c _ro s �oq b 1 � q c � v = _ _ � c c =c �. c+ y.o i _ _�_cy _ .rr •o_ _q }V ov - "4 y? C.`� y _ O v T° y � _ ° r ? _ W• v S _J Y C •_ • Q 4 v •J C C '_Y G r .r..r _Or V' O u V .� � N S A G ? •j � fn < C+ N j V l C DOJO V ^ �O^Ci� = �'q r� Can' C VPdV r G rC `O ii =d :2 =4 _9 C7 j.__ CO.n q i fr rr C rJ o= ��•:yy y. .r2 Jac G =�^ c,oi-G -•°i4— ° o �d :G =c oc�te o c u_J,.:Y. °•a �. G a_� _�... _ _ o G `_� qo V. .G r <� _ m c �_a � =,�°r. .'.Do •r =- o��' .I GvJV � -� °_ �u °•�_ ` 4N •.' yq � %v �_ �£ -4 ' ` J.w r _ -_r.n •• ". J LG. J OC iGG 1. u < - - -C 4��n ..T � •< Zrc. :i0 .C.. _ � c a ��r0 00 -_' = = =b � _� 'r' �_ oc mi D< IG.Zr NN -Zyl i 9J LO7�U L7 J�V NTcCr .. �nC >� 6C _G LL= V CJV ; CV VwG. r� m oz -•i y T w ✓ p � q r r ✓ p ' .. � L u •n r ;,, � v.� e � L _ q ^ O [ q H i c L ✓ y _ r L r V j ✓ •� G C Ci 7 T W Q �� t_ C J y L T I� � � •J N C C r�� 4 N ✓- '_ C V LGl N� V, yI Tr q O✓p C V r A !pN o N Y qO d V r0 '0 t C i" fF � � � .� T n ` � c n M i+ ✓ _ �. o_ c G ✓ A .rI i =V C_` ✓y �.T. �d 8d J 1�VLC O G C -U p 0 C C✓ 9 L r 7 _ � O -V 6 ✓ N C C _ ELO L• .A r. c _= �c - �, V w L - � L L O � � Lr u� �•� ✓ ✓ _ C V .) C � IN l O .T• C V O 0 ` r t'..n jG L _ C .�. VI 4 N � ✓ 6`0 ✓1 y ✓ C L y- Lai, 7 c _ s w v .. c V c ' r � C 9� 6 L 4 ° r O V A A V M I O l J C L' o .1. V O O J ✓ \ L V L e� � C o ` 7 r V = _ v V c V q � C r C M — c y S ^ L I� V z " Ic..y. C O q O M`A 4 r A li r INU 2_ O c v ti a N C q AL I . P. S y V m ^I �I 1 I I I � _ I _ I 3J � a 1 = I I A V q i ` V I I ° I V 1 ✓ _ Q ✓ Ht I L YU I �r� PI t c Jr A v � L O. - O J` 0 n T V V C � r u `O 4 - l W J C l C O T C u � o N � 7 G O V � c O � c ly ti . �I >! SI E Thu r pWL � w _ L ✓.i ` u Lys ��` � r.u` ~ G= q r. 0 r � ✓a. C -COO `y '^JVC �_'• u c— b u N �Z i° L �l u 0 0 l W r✓ �_ U q d �� i L V' C 6 C � �j• •J I^ _ L 4✓ O 2 _ V _ T w C W r y r •� A yl _, •r 1 E E b -/3 +rte V•_ _ G a o •.. ' f O'er '. L ' y .0 eG c w= •.' T _ u C i L t D O r � •' .T. v � y i 4 L O V � 6 —_ - + ✓> 69 C G •g i 0 V O'er it y� � O O T u� 7 C+_O Y� V T C i 7 C G� � N V •J O_ ( C v, r _^ � _� G Gr7 'J • O_•9u � r_ �� UCH'.• u +p lJr.n lC� _C O _ _ ( `OG G >L r L VeyC y 4 —5 - �. t —1 =`= b -/3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10076 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time ex, .,,on for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -3, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described tentative tract map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commissior has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That current econumie, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the tentative tract map at this time. ® C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval !, regarding expiration would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tract Applicant Expiration, 10076 Lightner Development August 25, 1985 & Contracting APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary f(J ^A Resolution r;o. Page 2 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EJ 2 2 v DA E: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAIFP Ps, EP®P,T September 12, 1984 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Rick 4amez, City Planner Dan Coleman, Az sociate Planner 81 - DALY - Keapplication for Design Rc:'Iiew of architectural changes for 178 condominiums on 13.7 acres of land located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and uermosa. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a review and approval of new architectural design for 178 condominiums. Tract 11625 was originaily approved on January 28, 1981 and Tract 11781 was originally approved on April 22, 1981. Revised elevations and site plan for both tracts were approved by the Planning Commission on May 11, 1983. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The elevations have been redesigned with a Mediterranean architectural style incorporating Spanish lace stucco exteriors and red the roof material. The central units are two -story condominium floor plans and the end units are stacked flat condominiums. The buildings have been designed with a variety of roof heights, building planes, detailed patio walls, and window treatments. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the new elevations and recommended aporoval subject to final construction consistent with the level of architectural detail and exterior treatment shown on the plans. The Committee also reviewed and approved the proposed decorative perimeter wall treatment that includes slumpblock, pilasters, wrought iron and a brick cap. This treatment was recommended for approval by the Committee based upon the compatibility with the Mediterranean style architecture. ITEM E z Z G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Design Review for Tracts 11625 & 11781 September 12, 1984 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: It is the Design Review Committee's recommendation that the Pianning Commission approve the revised elevations through adoption of the attached resolution. R ck ty :ui::ns Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Approved Site Plans Exhibit "C" - Proposed Site Plans Exhibit "D" - Approved Elevations Exhibit "E" - Proposed Elevations Exhibit "F" - Perimeter Wail Elevation Exhibit "G" - Proposed Landscape Plans Resolution No. 81 -07 Resolution with Conditions L, I E CJ T! 1751 ,�17�DALA ww .-i.. 4.. waaa 131n1�i r...wf• a -a+wl 'r. a+f 11'a -r�l � c.wcrC pp � n..a.s ..m• c E ?I-!I%ZS SATE DATA \` • 1rr MR3 . �� w.e� +.�wr(wera) -as4 saga N�'��NY• I C�I.t M s.. �.�f wn TC• �i1 } � asw ^d T r{ r... • 4�2 i aN1Y. NA 79th - .STREET CITY OF RA CHO CT'CA.10 \'GA PLnvNi�c Dp�rnoN 1TE.N 1: TITLE: I II� w L^I Y] S; •� V � rn� EXH113 . __Cc__ SCALE- �s I tII •'I i '� Y ✓Jti� •il{• "� 1 _. y, � _ r r `s � ♦ .�..". l 1 - � i rj�4 ah � isjE -. \ �T -4 � �I y ar _ t Y� y, i Fl .t � f � - ♦ . � � � � r t ' l.,l -:. �? rt'y -`., eU J'a i_�.f rig y - -. l� � _ � � o u. +�.z.'±•..i-- `C�..•i'= °'�.''"•— �f �� :a � t�� a 1� "_: rte% -- ... T[.. J � �]I, -' %4�� Lr �r%�iJ`Or+ /•�l>. .•�. ` � 1 "ht �' L�.�+ t f C : �;,� _— - -- •_sue, r. ^ ^" . LZ t'- J- All . IUj r Yir � t1 - t--♦ c +<'q' V� J r ^:i�. �I 1 • ",- S= :9 ! �Ylt� I � � ��I�I,� � ,i �� [ L. —^ �. 1�� '' JC�t r L f , I I _fir. 1 tl i>. -�' r.. A' I LL I / Il I 1 • 1 � � I I f _ r ^ �: - �x�. I I� i Il � }' �[�JC�i�I � *tq:. -I t_•.�.�__. -_ I ��1 ,..n ^_ , CITY OF RANJS-CHO CUCANION'GA P"MING DIE'ISIQV y.y� �� ° NURTH ITEM: j_L_�" TI'T'LE :_ FY EXlimrr l t SCALE: �--- -6 E. 11 I C=k-1 Tj--% - NURTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCATMONGA nnE j5xombdAm, PLANNING DIVISON EXHiBrr. scAip: 11 11 LEFT ELEVAMM 9 RIGHT ELEVAMON CITE' OF ® RANCHO .. •s i 1--D ITEM: CUCAN IO\GA. TITLE PUMNNING DIVISIOiN EltnF w NORT 4 WA 0 LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION RIG4T ELEVATION � NORTH CITY OF ITEM. RAINCHO C.'CATMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. SGLE° • -� X i�} 0 -, / CITY RANCHO CIUCALiN,10,NLGA PLANNING DIVISIO.N -Me- 9 IF L TITLE: LXI IIBIT: SCXLE- 11 zt } \\ Zt fj cc Q -A OL 3nw3AV VSOVdtjaH 0. -Me- 9 IF L TITLE: LXI IIBIT: SCXLE- 11 zt } \\ Zt fj cc Q 3nw3AV VSOVdtjaH -Me- 9 IF L TITLE: LXI IIBIT: SCXLE- 11 zt } \\ Zt fj cc Q r RFSOLUTION 110. 81 -07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11625. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11625, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Roberts Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue, consisting of 101 condominium dwelling units on 7.3 acres consisting of two (2) lots, and; WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract va. 11625 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans ano wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4 e /3 P, - rtesoiui,;on "0. dl -ui Page 2 l (9) This project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. Section, 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 11625, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division I. In conjunction with the development of Phase Z, all street landscaping and mounding shall be completed. 2. The use of any garden wails along the street landscaping shall incorporate alleuvial rock. 3. Interior landscape planters in front of garages shall be planted with trees. 4. Curvilinear sidewalks shall be provided along 19th Street. 5. The project shall be designed to retain Live Oak tree near the west property line and the live Oaks at the northeast corner of the site. A detailed tree plan shall be submitted which will indicate how such trees will be retained. Engineering Division 6. The street improvement plans `Or 19th Street shall be designed and constructed to meet any requirements of Caltrans. The plans shall be approved by Caltrans prior to recordation of t' - map. 7. Design and installatiin of improved channel facility for Alta Loma Channel from the northerly tract boundary to Hermosa Avenue shall be required per San. Bernardino County Flood Control District's Standards. All on -site and off -site required right -of -way shall be dedicated in fee to Flood Control District. The construction cost of the channel stall be credited to the stom drain fee, and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per section 8 of City Ordiranc., No. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the amount ,f these fees. 8. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas on north and northwest. 9. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quit claimed or delineated, as per City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 1V L E iiesoiution ;:o. 31 -07 Page 3 10. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalk. Under sidewalk drain shall be installed to City standards. 11. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvements, the developer shall contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the company the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company do--s not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Sur_h details shall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SY:�� Richard Dahl., Chairman retary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Plannina Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a ragular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMUMISSIONERS: Rempel, Sceranka, King, Tolstoy, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None .EPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject: TENIT4 1VC— 7 i I(&2Z Applicant: _Rci- G-ftl )`° Location:. NV46 fy tg1f4S Fr-%T i zt Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOI•:ING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. —Z 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all 1rts with adequate sideyard area for Recreato Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail bores, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant t;, City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof :materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _..L_. 9. All roof appurtenances, integrated, shielded fr and streets as required --Z10. Prior to any use of the thereon, all conditions the satisfaction of the including air conditioners, shall be architecturally )m view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties by the Planning and Building Divisions. project site or business activity being commenced of approval contained herein shall be completed to Director of Community Development. 6:f-16 . _Z11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Plann=ng Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shalt indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. no lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. --562. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. /_ 16. Siativatu patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. �16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices suchas window locks shah be installed on each unit. ® _y/ 19. All units within this development shall be prepiumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. KI 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. _ / 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. --22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. _ 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. _ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. x'=17 . r 25- This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building Permits and occupancy of the units. B. - Parking and Vehicular Access 1- All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. --It/-2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallor, size. _,/' 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. _/.4- Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements- _ 5- All parking spaces shall be double striped. _V 6- All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. _Z7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. —Z8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. —Zg. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulaticn aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C- & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. LandscaDina �1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved / by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. ✓ 2- Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. /S, n cr-I / _ Z 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the '".aster Plan. of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. _Z4. Street trees, a minimum o: 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' or, exterior streets. __Z5 - A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20V-24" box or larger, 70' ,'-15 gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. _Z6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and _Z7. are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. in the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. _ 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject tc approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted _ within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along 10-4iA aAAA jf�64 ® cr-I / D. Signs _%1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prier to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval Knd will require separate sign review and approval. Additional Approvals Required ?. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Penni t. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract lo./ E2 S is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change-L 4. 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract on , I have read the C.C. & R71-sand' understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. _Z6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or or to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the finai map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. O � ��O APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development ✓ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest_ adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other ap;licable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. ✓2. o �7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certifi.catiot: fr.:m the t/'0'3. affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilitie-1 are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have beer, issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to finai map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other 4. residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written, certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map _Z8. is not approved and recorded or building permits issued wher no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project /6. unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development ✓ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest_ adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other ap;licable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. ✓2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. t/'0'3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checr:ing Fees, and School Fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay deveiopment fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. /6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. s - 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. _ 3. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wc:od sidiro or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building considering use, area and fire- resistiveness 2. Existing building(s) shall be madE to comply Zoning regulations for the intended use or t 3. Eristirg sewage disposal facilities shall be to comply with appropriate grading practices Code for property line clearances of existing buildings. with current Building and he building shali be demolished. removed, filled and /or capped and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Gradinq __Z1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. __Z2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. V' 4. _ ``- grading plan shall be subject to review and a pproval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOIdING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access _ I. Dedications shat. be made by final map of all interior strL__ rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 1/ additional feet on Met -MCSS Allen I/ additional feet on /q' S r/� , V r&Weali4 cu //j Her *V5? flue per teni crap. A:0,=2 -�t- J. 0 11 �3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. _ 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as- fo11o:•!s: "5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas ; at; Y s b!! be teerrcled 6ulki 7qm /kw? 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. Street Improvements _ I. Construct full street 'r!provements incluc'ir,c. but :ot limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, side.•:e.iI. 'r', app -oaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. __!L 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURS & A. C. GUTTER PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE STREET APPR. I LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS BOTHER 1�Q� -r� ✓ I ✓�� i� � i i I i ✓ 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. — / 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all stye t i Hrovem n s, prier to issuance of an enc -oas dent pemit.FihO /Q /dirSOPIDjy+ !o[a{ialo�gn9-e� li-64 .CC!` tfid would QF�<<t cansfrrrcli�sf, 5. Surety shal -1 be p sted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing cou,pletion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 54 L P;. i 1 Drainage avid Flood Control ✓ 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer_ _ 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: _ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. f��lryUloc�g AO'�!!�° — 5. 1! r° "" shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street conncctsons, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. Utilities I. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. P/ 2, Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. ✓ 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. ►" 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CC'dD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. _Z6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies invoived. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. General Requirements and Approvals ✓ 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: ✓A. Cal trans for: _[j�fj Sf, B. County Dust Abatement required prior to issyan�e of a grading perm C. San Bernardino County Flood Control Distri.ct D. Other: E 11 11 Ii J 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeown ?rs Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this nap and a copy provided to the City. 3. prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shalt be borne by the developer. �/ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RA14CHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACTS 11625 AND 11781 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND HERMOSA IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 19th day of August, 1984, a complete application was filed by Daly Homes for review of new elevations for the above - described projects; and WHEREAS, on the '12th day of September, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described projects. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cuca,aonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in ® which the site is located; and ® 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tentative Tracts 11625 and 11781 is approved subject to the following conditions. 1. All conditions of approval for Tentative Tracts 11628 and 11781__ as listed in Resolutions 81 -07 and 81 -42, shall apply unless superseded by these conditions contained herein. 2. The revised elevations and perimeter wall treatment are approved subject to constro *_ion consistent with the architectural detailing and decorative wall treatment shown on the approved plans. Resolution Nc. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPEMBER, 1984, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Cha-rman ATI EST : Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary i, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adcpted by the = anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LJ U \' J CITY OF RANCHO CUCA, ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PERIMETER - Located in Terra vista, approximates) Avenue and Base Line Road I. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Lewis Homes, has proposed a design for the perimeter wall for single family residential tracts within the Terra Vista project. Specifically, this wall detail will occur along Haven Avenue and Bare Line Road within the tracts described above. The block will design concept is as follows: �. Use of a solid wall using three + ;�aterials (tan concrete block, tan slump stone block at entrances, and tan stucco) with the exception of wrought iron at side -on cul -de -sacs. 2. A substantial majority of the wall will use natural ivy cover over the concrete block. The expected time for full covering is five years. 3. Staggered 2 -foot setbacks will occur alternately between abuttino lot lines. 4. Wall elevation will change with the grade :levations independently along the project boundary. S. An 2 -inch block reveal will occur along the top of the entire block wail. The Terra Vista text provides examples of variations on all details within the Terra Vista plan including varied setbacks, meandering sidewalk, opportunities for ample landscaping ber:ning, and staggering of wails at varying heights. Examples of these are shown in Figure IV -9 of the text (see attached). Elements of these are provided in the concepts as shown by the applicant. The Design Review Committee considered this concept as one method for the perimeter wail design. Staff identified issues regarding the following: ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Perimeter Wall Design - Lewis Homes September 12, 1984 Page 2 1. The concern of the everpredominance of a natural landscape cover or, . the wail which was quite different from the wall concepts in the Terra Vista text. 2. A balance between the stucco and ivy. The Design Review Committee accepted the overall concept of the wall as proposed by Lewis Homes, but asked that the details be br -•ight to the Planning Commission for their approval. They re4uired that the material of the wail concept be used throughout all other tracts, but that future design details of the wall may be subject to modification in future projects consistent with the overall design concept as presented. II. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Design Review ommittee that the Planning Commission consider approval of the wall d —a' s•ibject to modification in future phases. ty TB:ns submitted, Example of Wall Detail, excerpt from Terra Vista Text, pages IV -7 and IV -8. 1 _QL 11 E 0 �o J C� G L I - Vf r C== C C W I Y •^ V i J O O � E L= ro TC j a N _Cv C C C: O Z U C O C L C y rs VC% to N U C V C L N •- L G� r tr O y Q y C W y J y G— rz ° n - L� c u c - G � C O� ^�G C J 7 Y C° 0 3 T� T > �Y N >. C C CJ E N � rC) aE<Er�: any .: tb 1 v � . C y .w v �,•r_ U U o C O •- > C O 3 v O T ^ G� C, v .— U c C C V •= N n r G - O G vL•- C> y y rI ro C@<? O Q N O fQ L _ «U. U L > tI1 G O G U w 5 V C : V C y •L N ?� G N C U y N G � G � "C � In L N N O y_ r,3 O CO U C L C.G.. C= L U n - G ✓ O G C -t�j rj U C C L U EE co O rJ N G t 7 J ty Y G v` - 7 r• 1 O c j � 6 T � m n n n Iri -- V 1-1 ti - is Z u r. U 1 N G U L i O c � O .J mr. y J _ MM O N J U U- C _ J c a ul ° rro - U U :J Y > :.L T YO L r y i C) L . L 1 rjI�YCJYOY. 1 1 L U C7 O G 0. L p L _ N1� . O O 7 r I 1 o V. t... U V 7 L•, N .� w Z) O n = _ O > O rz c r) o CJ r N L L V L C i w O � vl O U t3 r O U i ^ 7 C .y U N r G o rj 6) U L Q) C rJ U C n G L - 1 - J U y -Z O O "\.'1 m U O ` co = v N C c U _ C T.. _ .� G _ O L C C C O a N a l s- N C G O L C G C> ; GaN > CJQ.V as t-Llo- G L I - Vf r C== C C W I Y •^ V i J O O � E L= ro TC j a N _Cv C C C: O Z U C O C L C y rs VC% to N U C V C L N •- L G� r tr O y Q y C W y J y G— rz ° n - L� c u c - G � C O� ^�G C J 7 Y C° 0 3 T� T > �Y N >. C C CJ E N � rC) aE<Er�: any .: tb 1 v � . C y .w v �,•r_ U U o C O •- > C O 3 v O T ^ G� C, v .— U c C C V •= N n r G - O G vL•- C> y y rI ro C@<? O Q N O fQ L _ «U. U L > tI1 G O G U w 5 V C : V C y •L N ?� G N C U y N G � G � "C � In L N N O y_ r,3 O CO U C L C.G.. C= L U n - G ✓ O G C -t�j rj U C C L U EE co O rJ N G t 7 J ty Y G v` - 7 r• 1 O c j � 6 T � m n n n Iri -- V 1-1 ti - is Z u u � W 3-- 3 r. U 1 `c m L i O c � O .J mr. y a � N C y CJ U O N J U U- C _ J c a ul ° 0 � N M — ^_ ° o 7 YO • � � Tom. r y i C) L . L 1 rjI�YCJYOY. 1 1 < J G= �n p F— ^ r L CZ O G 0. L p L _ N1� . O O 7 r I 1 o V. t... U _'J i 1. C N c Y J _ z l [ C L w L Lj C; ^J, j t0 7 °!� O ` L E° E G ^ N CI r) o - kOY- -Uy +u1 u � W 3-- 3 Fifl m m Q `c m a u u O c � O 1 J u mr. E _ a � N m O m � O N t V a ul ° 0 � N M — ^_ ° o 7 OJ Fifl I I U 11 Ll 14 1, dl i-S 16'1 h. c =9 CG T O 0 C O U m a L u M � � W 7 c_ /y M rl 2 w W L o W a {L J w TV 0 El- SRI- 7 — � G O' G ZY C 4W I � N _ O a _ S L a m w cv w as U =iT UJ a T c' E c m G1� O.S Ell ' Q M a iz• F (7 � w Q W m N h. c =9 CG T O 0 C O U m a L u M � � W 7 c_ /y M rl 2 w W L o W a {L J w TV 0 El- O 0 O yL W _ S L a m w cv w as JI it J-7 ;.3 ,. "I � --5 I ii 4 r t !7� C., Cfi �N Em Iz. 7St '4 I r� nit f�r�-lA It 771-- w x -4-6 VL G VISIA Ttfli3l El r t !7� C., Cfi �N Em Iz. 7St '4 I r� nit f�r�-lA It 771-- w x -4-6 VL G P El 11 E r� c .` �°� u ' r, Lf � ` A � Y. .. -� tip',♦ I' � � � 1 IIA Ule 3Z-VIA.- 3,OC9119111 -N Ell _1 } _ O ' U o '� � •,�c ' _L .. '�w//Z` � is � i�r s 0 • � a / / � ��n j) E L - -- :,�_:_ •° �\ T� it , •) ;awi< asap T`' .. .,(�\ .: \�''• , -, �j z ••; '; �: �; "1 t � I• j < G o • -- z - I�VJ _I>awanr ware El E 0 w P < T 4L t . • . � - -+\` - 7]VTJ AS711] � - . - vTTie — u r ?' er u � f � ir• �y (()( 5-1 `v;l K 1i > el �. 1z t / \� •� n - I � a.. to � � �� . :nl'z ,I fL� - `\ Yr>dF /, J >F \• y • I, m M .T]V1J � ' VitOMf1M 4-i < T 4L t . • . � - -+\` - 7]VTJ AS711] � - . - vTTie — u r ?' er u � f � ir• �y (()( 5-1 `v;l K 1i > el �. 1z t / LJ E 11 CITY OF AFF CUCAMONGA ST REPORT DATE: September 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: GRADING MODIFICATIONS TO TRACT 12238 - CITATION BUILDERS - A residential subdivision of 74 lots on the north side of Church, between Hellman and Lion. I. BACKGROUND: This tract subdivision was approved by the Planning Commission on January 12, 1983. This project was not submitted as a total development package and must reapply for design review of elevations at a later date. The developer, Citation Builders, is requesting modification to the approved grading concept for some slope configurations to accommodate a larger usable pad area which would provide for future construction of additions or pools by the homebuyer. The original conditions of approval, minutes, and approved grading plan are attached for your review. ii. ANALYSIS: The developer is proposing to increase the flat usable yard area and eliminate some 4 -foot high retainin3 walls an lots in the northern portion of the tract. This is proposed to be accomplished as follows: I. Lowering the approved pad grades 6- inches to 2 -feet; and, Z. Providing 2:1 to 3:1 slope gradients instead of 3:1 to 16:1 slopes as originally proposed. By increasing the slope gradients and lowering pad grades, the overall slope height is kept the same or less than originally approved. To mitigate the increase in slope gradient, the conditions of approval require slope planting for all 2:1 slopes in excess of five (5) feet in vertical height. The Grading Committee has reviewed the proposed changes and determined that they will not alter the drainage of the project or individual lots. However, the Committee felt that it would be appropriate for the Commission to review and approve the new grading concept. ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Grading Modifications - Tract 12238 September 12, 1984 Page 2 D III. RECOMMENDATION- The Grading Committee recommends approval Of the proposed grading modifications through minute action. tek�ectf�> y ubmitted, n icl owawl City Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit ';B" - Aerial Photo Exhibit "C" - Approved Grading Plan Exhibit "E," - Proposed Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Section Resolution No. 83 -05 and Conditions Planning Commission Minutes - January 12, 1933 9 0 �' 1 Ll c CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,Z IQ \'GA PLANNING DI\,UON ITB I= 2C IZL'SB TITLE: VicAt4r1Y MW E \I DIGIT.- "A" SGNLE- G -3 - V NORTH t 1 ITB I= 2C IZL'SB TITLE: VicAt4r1Y MW E \I DIGIT.- "A" SGNLE- G -3 - V NORTH nl K � 1`•t J ! •. t r. L'�;'• � � rte. *�' '�{ .�_ t t,. ' 1j .. yS!dJ�rl:'f %r ','1,1 rz J t, rT ♦... t •' t�l".' 4r�(:J:: 4� •rVi i l li f t j i t � 1 �4•� �3y T Y� .,� rl .n1i1 � J �'f ter•. i'�i 1 ., .G.}t 1�+ .. l '. �� It aJ.�. ��.•!i � ?.� '{` Y3'i�;�ntf�♦({ r fir..', � �.� .. � Jilt � .i. ?.I ��1 .� i.' .iP la �_ �S �� .,:;. .�,"• -. 11A AT Aug i :. ' v'i J ems" t 11 ,-cal' �A } .-'• .^i AF. n " � F?' � • )" tt'Y•�.♦ is ��♦ 2*r- � �: 3h iG 11TT""� J� y +�i 1 "�j..♦ , a.. t r jai �r 1 ' �-�.11, -.� J l•i.� fr 4��A.S ♦.J 11; f fi�tjt`L! fi 4 ` �. -fA^ >T 'ti .:j t'.1�J 1�„`, 1��iJ >_ "w♦'...° - �7 i 71 1 '• !I 1 LI''I .'.T � I , I � I 'j0 \�. Iii Y•l47% J` �,�I �v �' �� 5� '- i' _� r } .I •'�',� 31 ^��f � � o~I it III INK I L Ci `may <ji"� o• �., A _ � .6 ^/ � '�, _�,�Y�1flD. � I- .Ts •iT�t '•'[. � c� , � 0 11 Lx ar ' r\Jl� rpS '\ °Q � • /i / /%j- � .� 1 i�! '�� +! p /�_ _ __ter —I � r~ / \ f -- •.� _mac.+ ! € —_ Eel =1 /� /� � �� ." � '� %{ _', _ \ � / . [_'_ - -• _ _ y IE s, a i+� t G-S .c 9 __ � < � j �� f �� ♦ Y IA`i 3x —ICI i E :. t" i � �♦ J`^e'"- /a / 1 / I )Y• •'. �C. �, / �- � V 'C ; ` 1 g'i, I � th Jill Ai —s. _ I _. a . 'I '+ £ , / • �� ! ' yet, ,{p � :� �1p{I R {' �'.�.. v 1 a ♦ i /: L��' . ~.I "/ . X44 �1TP� i" Sig- 41 I 1 � 1 I y ACC I Tai ^ _ AOL _ \ 71 ♦ ems• -. �' t/w f �i `� / / .,�•�. .y / //y f..- r:r ^�J`.,.q .�. Y ♦p. /i!'. - _ '°{ice N/\, • � � .. Y .fie• �- r 1 /� ;, tilt We 'IC'cp b�/ ca f ir f € {f CS nz E Z" 6' lam to 5 EE 7E.Tull -- m WX IT fl \_ _ A- �-- IL �GP�Dc" -ID T)RA M DIZ4 ? 3? 1% TYPICAL SECTION"p "• "p" INOP.TH CITY OF R A- CHO CUCANIO\GA TITLE44:2�1 c)`o P rVNINING DIVISION E\HIMT. 62 SCALE: t RESOLUTION NO. 83 -05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12238 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12238 hereinafter "Map" submitted by C.H.R., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a rP:,dential tract subdivision of 18.5 2cres of land in the R -1 zone, located on the north side of Church Street, between Hellman Avenue and Lion Street into 74 lots, regularly came before the Planning Cc,-,mission for public hearing and action, on January 12, 1983; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Co=ission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the foiloking findings in regard to .-�ntative Tract No. 12238 and the Map thereof: (a) Tne tentative tract applicable interim and pla "s; is consistent with all proposed general and specific (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) Ti:e tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for ar_ess through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. G -Y E 11 2 �- J 11 r Resolution No. 53 -05( Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. I. If this tract is recorded prior to Tentative Tract 9547, then Tentative Tract 9547 shall become null and void. If Tentative Tract 9547 is recorded prior to this tract, then this tract shall become nu'il and void. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract ?rap No. 12238, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Variable front yard building setbacks no less than 20' shall be recorded with the Final Tract Map, and shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division prior to recordation of the map. 2. Landscaping and irrigation must be provided by the developer at the ends of the two temporary cul -de- sacs, anc in the front yard of the flag lot, number 30, subje ^t to the review and approval of the Planning D ;!ision prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The street frontages of lots 7 and 9 must be increased to the minimum 40' required by the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Retaining walls must be provided on lots with side yard slopes exceeds-; 4' in height. Details must be provided with the final grading plans prior to issuance of building permits, and subject to the review and approval by the Building Official. 5. The final design of the perimeter wall on Heilman Avenue shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division prior to final approval and recordation of the map. construction techniques and choice of materials shall provide for low maintenance and long -time attractiveness. G -9 i Resolution Nd,-. 23 -n5 Page 3 6. A six foot (6') high block wall shall be provided at the terminus of the temporary cul -de -sacs. Said walls shall be constructed with expansion joints at the front yard building setback line of adj,;rent lots to permit easy removal of the wall when an:; if the street(s) is extended. ENGINEERING DIVISICN 7. All lot line adjustments necessary to form the project boundary shall be recorded prior to recording of Tract Map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1983. PLANNING CO,,%1MISSION Or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAt•IONGA 3erfjey K, g,%Chalrm / anning ommissior, I. JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of January, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COb1MISSIONERS: NOES: COT•74ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, STOUT, BARKER, MCNIEL, KING NONE NONE n LJ L_ J r dr d V9 r bC nF r� P �� A 96 -�9r9 �� OV r q � —� wJ•VC -O � �.LLa =r r O - V •/ � J L � U T L L a q� C a 9.� S O L E A NO'^O rr Ce�L VV Y LP6 aC � LW 3_- 2� `i.L q dq^ VV'JV G Ol 9G• N^ Vq GU OTr LqG q`NC ✓ r�q .Li��r 6F C�3 q�AO y _Z V y g L G � N d ... _ �. Y• N °r '��4 qEq 7vara rP VG rZ qor suV 9G �J_Sa.GO � O a �> C P � O x C O_ r r q T� 6 -• S a V V I ^ C W, G A r L O G i V N 9 N 9 L G N W J N 3 V V 9 p G P9 > C C N G L r G V N N S q V V d � G 6` r r N• A G_ O p • .i O O V'PL ^< � �G r N Nr_`Ur 9� C O r N L � N L q L b� C f Gj Gj L ✓ em u ` C C� x C G U 9 y V y g a r 9 9 y y> 9 C C C O C O G A g C a vb L4.y •iO�PU 6^•�9 O N� Z ^u C NCO iV A O Z L_` _ Y— y r r ' O A q •J A P q> r V 9 �_ ^ q t •+ T J 6 V C 6VC Qq'�Ld 6N6y 4A`.m 6a rnM �N6 FL NO ✓IqA QV Jry 6d qr 01 O 10 <O m P ` r> ... q L V V r q O ° E C E y Z L r C 9 L b O V L• r M� q Y 6 T! _ L W 9 0� q V � G> 9 C q• C S S� r I• fJ MGO 9y•..r 4Cq OC OAi 4NyE r0 G L L VV 4�0 y�<r9 dqG Y N S d 9 C r .1c y V N 9 O V ` W rGr PqC r r OC CJ7 CVrL xi O Ln V- L .C< Vq 9NN d�0 Or4 � O V >j� Or. OHO yy 9L� G.LwrO N -�• • V C O �I � Z L V L. r<r O.G q PN TiM rVgd C C q`9 LO G' ••' dC '-G CqG� VyCw T C. y C yl N rf p 6 J q y D L O r 6 i 6 � i � O 6 V� G •> ^' O V Z's g m •. r .. r = -� iI �t ) AW�ov vc `o�a_q �. i.r.'• -= ,G .^�^ 9 9 9c •- °- � Poe OT ^ xu °'�� a a�7r_',JV,? -o_ N tea•° _i' a NLSn ^= •p 6 _ C r O O n O Pr O V O . dC nr9 Gr 4t -' r �' � •'f N T 7 4 r C E O Gw V _ o =_ °' n_ _ F r G 9 4 o Pu • � .�. p v 7 Pa. � A c^ � d • d C G^ L uyiTLq 6 ° -�omw o_.. jiL .4>.^ _p q � Nm G°•, ° a'M ra U,- O .OyC F� v_ y9r �3 =L_ G G •`OOa 6G6� u�c9y6 oY rL2 y G C y 6 9 O. O d L a S pD� ^p V 9 p V a l M w p' �, r C d ¢ rr y S y _T • N C Yp. V rTq 22 90 ^N n C Pd9 p O CAS 9w 9�6 ^. 914 GrV 9C�j4UV .oi.�GOa Nq•L..r q• L` G9� �L N Cq N�rO drgp G.P'�a ^G lyL=L Y9 O.°rur y >r` Cr 0` ^.•+06TL, ' O N a r y0 V < 0 L 0✓ uni M� � G �Fd� 4jr -qy r= r C G ° g V O l Y• O = = P N G S O l y O w p v C r d y r � S O l Y C G N t N= T p V L _G' •u r 0. C q N O C T � q � •... 01 V y s C > p _• ^ � G ,V., �p G d ^x4r ^.>-O Yri dj9 dC �n Od VVYL• O N v. •_O O i^+ ^'v � � y V p CC y u O. N a N� G V L� _ C^ V ., NV _C 0^ '0 �9x L'ei �NN4 L Y 6VM L ^.O �• 6 6.9 rCIMOy _ 9 �V LLG v „>. 4N0.9 Wd 061 GI O C Q i� 1 V °' ' �{ o u 1 7 T 2 S! P _ V i i d P V N4•J q 7 j',� L �O OPIO �Oq NOCn''N O 4 4 .� PO• 6 ._. 90 r G c p .°.. �w�n pn. ^E,• ^.N.vs�.p�u n>.a- _r yQ n� L a4. o _ N 4L� Ftiri.x 4 V -0_`'aOCV� N � N19, `� V L� TO 4 �a 8° L G N o �'' i v 4 J5 tMV'gn = =o°y' 9° N f c•^ ... '^ yet°, 3 C� V IV'^.V.La V C��y>j y 90 0 ^ W •.n � 'v 7r ^ M O U T 4 C O G O _� N V 7p�� G�La9 Mi y2OOJ��O qCV „�r.0 V�c'O 6ZgV V` .n`p 9x0 > _C✓�i` 6`.4Yi 40Y E 000 °N��o C� C n GL� c G V_ O O N .L.+ G a` V N G •'� q 0 � c_ ! d i L a n_ a o > r u n '^ a..7T • 7 4 c c w r L u 6 J O O b 9 °� • G ^l, .O 'O 4, •O 0 4 N C O Q _ N. V T `� V u Y- Gq T0.�9V l`` Ou rVV�N_'V4V �_V7L -_ vl O PLr - -_ ny V'^ 6 =Vn9 V_' a �•��•°a �4 V u • .our � •” y �. 0 _ _ L . c � _ c N ^ •+ •Ji O � r � P C7 � J 6 O _ =4J CC GarL `. a4. GG .S ^JwoNL�^ �� BOA CO OCP66 � N CP• AP � — vv L �G�. co° do °v�,.'•c > Nn G v.re = � .°. °O� M Y G V v •- v� r N � V u p r N q q q N q N° C p C q Nn C�00 a ^� OG C C _dV P•. O `N 6 X00 NV TU Oe� G Or G^ 00 p G a� FPC OJ Vp UA b Pj NG pt I'aP b CgLI ._ .`e oz • °_� 3Z�� ^.y�. °9c aw• y dG.. .G. ''.� A•N.. 40 `� � .T.00b rO T7c A Q r iNG Ar ^ V aVT r i T V Y e— c roV��— G F n N G � U .G• N P� w. � d p T G' \• O n � .1 O �> O N N V ' L V V w. U i y • .a _ _ G _ _' 6 r Y C'V� F..r �.°+O N..•A CO \_6Y O 6LP Hi+� CGM b YM A. �� n `•9 OHO NC V VY ~�AV ` C N =C �v0 A L •L. c¢ o =_~ r •ter c°= vu u °� r^ GN Nr n �`�° lY b r• G q G i G6 VY M C YY p p OOOO i n •G..r OaVVVV PV° ° r�F V' —L Ni. OHO Lu MULG C'°]nO �S O .Ni�AC•�VV �Pqr� A9 �O d °Y, L9C ` 9 purl r40d \ -.a .rr NG bNV�p6 C_ar rVy b Goa NQ V Va .. Y _rU x1N �'LC� fo0 ri •pi> rUq rPM N'.N �O TV >C —W H V G V N G P O O E rOL i�w CE V up bGATC Vr Y_.ce Nv � p ^L GC• •� V •J t T G Y M O N N N N C' >= C � C `+ >' L N r C Y� p N � Q _ Fr �V N M —N wL N_ 6a <N iNVV A_Op <V : -y.p•• �N� V+NS 3uii 6^ JLH— O Iz C P O N p t (+1 � ° u �w. A (+S; � r •`• .°• �� o � i �, = Ara. 'L C •J } F - OL r G' p I `p7 G_C �100L Ur •A.y jL° � O r V A• N G A n �`O ' n� 6 K_r a— O L V LI`•.r Y C: V _ � 7 p� C •. 4 V r• - �. N � N I � C N - p � r u—j =� pL � � � C�� O p L A 1 O a q V .+ r' e p°. � ' � O C. > r ` C' o L �"' {l+f y p T9 Y Y •••V —O N= II b= ^ =N °S O. rGL G .. YC Op Or LN Fw• O q _ Y A pd y iYd P LYE _= > ^ •w � O V C.� N Y r .a C C N V G L` N y..r° L Y L r• G d — EPOS TC A QY wC P�`Yn K AN G__ CF O •O/u` N NOS —A ^_GO VO l O` Pi PLC O l N6V< N) G`f [ 9[ 1 C t k I II tiA��C i'6t0 °V C O C9 W� _ u Ei bC i1. dY = q ^ 66r 0. � ry + � N C� • N1 O\ \O\ \I'I \O BOA CO OCP66 � N CP• AP � — vv L �G�. co° do °v�,.'•c > Nn G v.re = � .°. °O� M Y G V v •- v� r N � V u p r N q q q N q N° C p C q Nn C�00 a ^� OG C C _dV P•. O `N 6 X00 NV TU Oe� G Or G^ 00 p G a� FPC OJ Vp UA b Pj NG pt I'aP b CgLI ._ .`e oz • °_� 3Z�� ^.y�. °9c aw• y dG.. .G. ''.� A•N.. 40 `� � .T.00b rO T7c A Q r iNG Ar ^ V aVT r i T V Y e— c roV��— G F n N G � U .G• N P� w. � d p T G' \• O n � .1 O �> O N N V ' L V V w. U i y • .a _ _ G _ _' 6 r Y C'V� F..r �.°+O N..•A CO \_6Y O 6LP Hi+� CGM b YM A. �� n `•9 OHO NC V VY ~�AV ` C N =C �v0 A L •L. c¢ o =_~ r •ter c°= vu u °� r^ GN Nr n �`�° lY b r• G q G i G6 VY M C YY p p OOOO i n •G..r OaVVVV PV° ° r�F V' —L Ni. OHO Lu MULG C'°]nO �S O .Ni�AC•�VV �Pqr� A9 �O d °Y, L9C ` 9 purl r40d \ -.a .rr NG bNV�p6 C_ar rVy b Goa NQ V Va .. Y _rU x1N �'LC� fo0 ri •pi> rUq rPM N'.N �O TV >C —W H V G V N G P O O E rOL i�w CE V up bGATC Vr Y_.ce Nv � p ^L GC• •� V •J t T G Y M O N N N N C' >= C � C `+ >' L N r C Y� p N � Q _ Fr �V N M —N wL N_ 6a <N iNVV A_Op <V : -y.p•• �N� V+NS 3uii 6^ JLH— O Iz C P O N p t (+1 a Lom Puc G+LV c. =oq ni•". or or.. � a v�cP�N R`�O � GC U6J U CTS <CN •O/C �- �'G L6 PVl T ^J T _ r7 ^) r _ .Y �'_' r• _6 Vr CC L � NC• 1 dY^ G. l N C� ^O O ^r Tp T L C L l 7 —V. v iJ L 4 C J j � R V U N O p 0 V y G o U �+ p a O � 4� �` ` q G r V v M^ O r .r •.... V \F. V � V W G O N j N U °y _ - C N L L `._ L C• D 4° 6 O r G • 9V _ O D c N r. V l d a d C _ ?` C 'Or 6•O..C� G �rL °N. 'PD\J y.` � �d ` L u. � E � 0 0..• U d 7 T y� N� P E c` `J U V G ° O� aV9> iV NOi•Y.n� "N L OL Off• C,r Y' y �� c`F� 'VO• \N N O N 6 g A p � pr E r U ` 4D 4 L W p D t C V O P T O CI')I p O p O 71 1 WI ��v —rN.n VNUm 2% G G d �✓ v m a P V y 2 u _ � O L O _ O O J— C O 4 0 V V r` aY W C 4 U' O• �r C d r V mot ._ O� r g N LO V T �uG, u N r.� o d G °� �•J ? VrY LN •� ^` O y V V L C q` a � E 4 V �+ 7 :5:L L • G N V U•. VL�.i - p 9l Oy L9a_ U crCU 4d _P 9 _ C'L G` �• 7 ' r � y= C r 7' C C� �� L � C P C_ .? •.r -^ ^J E .Vn O v y 6 C d O t O ^ o f N •� O. O •.. omN •a .`LO 6 � r....�Vvnr _ rTC 4 JI VC. PL_ P� 00 C L Jf G =i C. r V� L G G.:: W r• L'� � r Ll .n � 6 V i] W N'O u V= O O. V^ n 2 SI �II _ O �J E 1 I `�Na •— rte^ °`� y y __ M ` LT _ _ `ODD✓ •� ^ ^U V NL ✓ V— V - °� °+c -• Gu ° � aN ° ° v N poR rOi < MN — 1� — p er �- r-o — �� c C V L_ ro � G• 9 Y V r u a P N G Y C� I \I \i ,i I �- r0 69 TLL� C.y Or N m r l� r•Ce JJ C r l V � C� :• J C I �}CrC CA rr'J a.CL C V� C•- -,.aPN S CN •�LYr ° 4VP n�� °� `` L ^LTV u —_ I I � ;�l ° r -n« ni.yv r� P•aDrd r mV I� C —L r L -'r ��IL,I �I I c�cc+ � o'•r..ea 'r °r" �Q �`' i .•a_'d L `- 1 Ic U_ I� I \i I, I I'� N O.'n C .+ —? p V 6 6r• — •_ � u 17 ^ d l d GC T9d 7�9 —WGC EL L .Tr raJ Vl qL 9D Tr „rr .n O� L d N O u H •a rJ e�— � I I I I^ v` 'a G n D O q • r N O V R r° N. y S = 'ii•:Jy rvVq�1 r4�— W C CVr•l9uJ Tr C V lJ � � I P� ^ H O C r y n J ! •0 V V� C I U i /I I I N•,"rLr• Nyy NLV J t�- SC- frrd`� V OL v7 ` 6 V O N O r O ^ V 6 •^ N L V Y n V 9 _1 9 C \mI P \I \>I I 'I I U_ N y•J —C ° V C r ° •a G O G D V V N � •I �. C :� U I I 1 O � O O V c 4L+ P N N L c',Nq cS h c : o _ ZI •_ • ^ v _ � V 2 S P Y C C r r _ J..r C_c •-E O— �` av J -•� 1 L o � �. o - D cro �• _. L V — d9_6i Y O O C .•o c �_� a• yra _ C n _ 'Sat V C C ry 1 G u t C _�-s U ^ 2 J V C O ° J •O.r r N • D V V N J V i O O V c 4L+ P N N L c',Nq cS h c : o _ •_ • ^ v _ � V 2 S P Y C C r r _ J..r C_c •-E O— C _�-s 0 V O G I� L E w- C_ ^T J' GdG r - T ^ •^ L � V `SF n Gp N r M C a9� •O V .Vr j� _d P V � qN V P Zp O Lr - Vf P r •Gn � lV' d �• . C V [i u— c nd q ~u - v0 N V • 6 L t7 _ n O 6 U T C L J y q V S q O V W Q V L V L N V O d �� oT Ca O � N ' � f. V O O • 6 � � 01 4r G 6 n 6 J Gl L N L L c J c- _ .r c v ? ° • O O q .d. C r . P C O. q J O •P � q C + O V N • d` - N O i N O O 9v aJ efgy. q� ':° N V ° .[ N N q q L P •La _Ty Y d C E g n'• q •'i• J q N C I i q Fes- aL0 EL'j� •„ cc N' i .V.• —ZW 9 V C i N= F r •i q O 6 ^„ y C C U y P d L g C C • v O L r '� •Li - oa n �C «I � GLN T•�u ��G� � nV � ' VV .� �� ' V � d G n q` � C I, V �•• r V 7 J N L' C.r ? O I V J J 7 •r C V Cu S U r !� d = V C G•JG q�E O _T 1rI ! [_qit V I �L J �• _ __ C� .O r I �� iL O.N •'��L ��^" dd_ I Ld Or C r r I mi a► �I \ �i� i � � � t � �� I -� - G I� L E CONSE%T CALENDAR Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to approve the Consent Calendar. *A. E:VIPONMENTAL r.SSESS:]ENT FOR DEVELOP:rENT REVIEW 82 -22 - R C INDUSTRIAL - The deveiopment of two warehouse /distribution buildings of 345,500 square feet and 258,000 square feet on 73.55 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served zone (Subarea 10) , located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo - APN 229-261-26 and 28. *B. c<+VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82 -23 - SCHLOSSER - The development of two manufacturing /warehousing buildings of 21,600 square feet and 10,800 square feet on 19.4 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial zone (Subarea 9) to be located at 11711 Arrow Route - APN 229 - 111 -17 and 18.. *Project falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. a a ■ t is PUBLIC HEARINGS G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12238 - C.H.i;. - A residential subdivision of 74 lots on 18.5 acres of land in the R -1 zone, AM located on the north side of Church Street between Hellman Avenue and Lion Street - APN 208 - 011 -06, 208 - 291 -02, 11, 13, 19, 22 and 23. Chairman King advised that this item would be handled first on the agenda. Curt Johnston, Assistant :lanner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman King opened the public hearing. E Mr. Ronald Martin, P.O. Box 157, El Toro, California, the applicant, indicated that he had nothing to add concerning the conditions of approval but would answer any questions. Mr. John Hamilton, 7480 Hellman, asked about the flooding and drainage ditch, and whether, if they put up a retaining wall in conjunction with this project, he will be flooded out. Mr. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, replied that when the detailed review of the grading plan is made there will not be any ponkets of undrained cater that will be allowed to form and further, that they will be watching for any prohlens. .ars. Linda Beaulieu, 7510 Heilman, asked about the cul-de -sac at HE _,.man and under what conditions the street would be allowed to go through. Planning Commission Minutes -2- January 12, 1983 6 -/ 7 Mr. Rougeau replied that the street would go through only if the houses on the two lots affected were torn down and somebody wanted to subdivide into three more lots, or if another lot were created. Mr. Rougeau indicated that they would have to be sure that that street were not blocked off; however, if the people living in these houses continue to do so and do not try to further subdivide the property then the street will not go through and the propertv rights of the existing residents would prevail. Mrs. Beaulieu asked what this tract will provide to the school districts. 1.!r. lam repl.;_ed,with the requirements that are made of the developer to provide certification from the school districts stating that there is adequate space in the classrooms, fees which are paid through the building permit procedure, and the timeframes in which the certification is obtained. Mrs. Beaulieu asked if before this tract is finally appr >ved there will be a presentation such as the one made by the Lewis Developmer_t Company. Mr. Lam replied that the final approval of a map is ministerill. and must conform to whatever the Planning Commission has approved. therefore, the final map is placed on the consent calendar for City Council action which, in effect, finds that the map is in conformance with whatever had been presented to the Planning Commiss'on. It-. Lam stated that since this is the case a presentation like the -ewises would not be made. Mrs. Barbara Bond, owner of property in front of the proposed project, stated that a wooden fence would not serve the purpose at the cul-de -sac but w,.uld be an open run for children on the way to school. She stated that after a period of time this would then be considered public right -of -way and she did not want this to happen. She asked what the developer intends to do at this location. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, stated that what is shown on the tract map is a six -foot block wall and there is no mention of a wood fence at the cul-de -sac. Mrs. Bond stated that Mr. Martin indicated it would be a wood fence. Mr. Hamilton asked when they widen Hellman will there be four or five lots between Base Line and Palo Alto that are narrower and if they have to put in street improvements. Further, would it have to match the new street, and at ,,;hose expense. Mr. Rougeau replied that the approval of this tract, because of the large number of houses along Hellman, will really have no bearing or. how Soon Hellman is wizened. Mr. Rougeau stated that when home im,rovements are made the City requires that street improvements be made also, but this will net be done at this location for a long time and that perhaps in the long term this may be a Citv project but it would be a long way off. Mrs. Betty Burgess, resident at Church and Lion, asked if the design of these homes will be single or two story. Planning Commission Minutes -3- Janr.ary 12, 1983 6 -i � Mr. Johnston state' that at this 1, -- i^ ___e _nos project ect �s f0. re r ; p J subdivision of land cnly and the applicant is not the developer. fr. Johnston explained the growth management plan which necessitates the developer coming in .nd going thro+igh a point rating system at which tin. °_ the tract would be reviewed. M^. Johnston advise that if the residents wish to, they could provide staff with their names and addresses and when this design is finalized, they would be notified so that they could examine the design. Chairman King stated that given the interest sho-.m uy the residents, the City would make sure that their names get into the file so that they can be notified when this project comes before Design Review. :'here being ra fl.:rther comments, the public hearing was closed. Comxissione.^ Rempel stated that having sat on the Design Review committee and working with the applicant he 'rows that t._ applicant has been qu' diligent in bringing through a good project. Mr. -Re=pel further stated that the wall is a valid poir_t and that an expansion joint could be put in so that it could oe knocked our. if a street ever goes through the cul-de -sac area. Mr. Hopson stated that a tentative tract map on this property has already been approved and asked that the Commission place a condition on this tract map that when the firs;, tract map is final this cne :.a revised so that different lot nursers do not appear. Chairmen King asked if rather than revising this a condition could be o'U ced on tae nap which would void whatever =.ap was not final. Mr. Gomez, City Planner, stated that the applicant was present and asked if the Con =issicn could address this point to hi =. Mr. Martin replied that whatever records first would void the other. He indicated that there are three major property owners involved in this and he has 9 -1/2 acres upon_ which he holds an option that he does not wish to lose but he would consent to that condition. C=rn ssioner Mchie' asked if there is anything in the future that would say when something will be dore with Hellman. idr. Rougeau asked if DL M--Niel meant widening of the street. Mr. Mch'iel replied yes an:; stated this -ouid be below Base Line. Mr. Rougeau [Stated that there is nothing in the 5 -year capital improvement prog:a= to do any street wid.ring there; however, there is a project currently under de ;n to clean up the water caer the railroad tracks. ;L ^, = ougeau stated ti development along Hell= would tak car- of some street widening and if there are spots that are not widened, a City project will be needed tc clean up the rest of it within the next 15 -20 years. Mr. McRiel stated twat the plan before tae Co =fission does not address any of it with the exception of the 7 'Lots before ::urch Street. Planning ;�ion Minutes -4- Ja :uary 12 1983 Mr. Reugeuu replied that it will run under the n dra'a on the north side of the tracks. Further, lar; e puddles o:: the railroad tracks or north of explained the la.-ge basin south of vineyara Park property itself Will be carried to the street. silroad tracks to the storm tnat there will not be any the railr:,ad. Mr. Rougeau and that the water on the Motion: Moved by R--mpel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 62 -05, approv ng Tentative Tract No. 12238, issuing a negative declaration witn an amendment to the conditions of approval that t:.e first tract sap to final will void t ?,e other tentative m,p, and that the wall design be continuous and designed wit: a knock out for a future street. * i i 3 i •C. _rlVIRO'NMENTAL ASS SS'I: NT AND PARC -L MAP 77' industrial subdivision of 63.79 acres into side of 8th Street, approximately 440 feet the M -2 zone - APN 229- 261 -26, 28. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil F .ga.neer , pr_sented out a change to condition 10 regarding utility rec -ui e,rent on parcel .r,uater three. Chairman King opene,: the public hearing. 37 - R.C. ASSOCIATES, II - 3 parcels, located on the east of Pittsburgh Avenue the staff report and poin- bonding which would defer An south in ;ad this 11:`- Jim Nestling, applicant, asked that the Comaissi -n consider holding the requirem=ent for street fighting aLd street trees on lot three until it develops. Mr. kestling indicated that other than that recuest, he had read and understood all other conditions and there was no problem. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commis. ner Remoel stated that he agreed T,itn the applicant because from a practical standpoint there is a chance that the improver-nts will be dataged and would have to be replaced. Mr. Hopson, stated that there might also be further subdivision of this parcel. M^. Rougeau stated that it would be apprn;,__ate not to put in trees or street lights at this time. Commissioner Stout asked if underground electric would be put in at this time. Plann.ag Comaiss`.on Minutes January 12, 1983 t Mr. Rougeau replied that this is correct. Further, tnat the street would be narrow i„ front of the school. - Commissioner Stout stated that he agreed with Commissiorer Rem-„a1 on the condition for the block wall whica could be taken down if the strut goes t' „•ough. :ie asked where the water will go after improvements are male to the drai,age ditch. Mr. Reugeuu replied that it will run under the n dra'a on the north side of the tracks. Further, lar; e puddles o:: the railroad tracks or north of explained the la.-ge basin south of vineyara Park property itself Will be carried to the street. silroad tracks to the storm tnat there will not be any the railr:,ad. Mr. Rougeau and that the water on the Motion: Moved by R--mpel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 62 -05, approv ng Tentative Tract No. 12238, issuing a negative declaration witn an amendment to the conditions of approval that t:.e first tract sap to final will void t ?,e other tentative m,p, and that the wall design be continuous and designed wit: a knock out for a future street. * i i 3 i •C. _rlVIRO'NMENTAL ASS SS'I: NT AND PARC -L MAP 77' industrial subdivision of 63.79 acres into side of 8th Street, approximately 440 feet the M -2 zone - APN 229- 261 -26, 28. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil F .ga.neer , pr_sented out a change to condition 10 regarding utility rec -ui e,rent on parcel .r,uater three. Chairman King opene,: the public hearing. 37 - R.C. ASSOCIATES, II - 3 parcels, located on the east of Pittsburgh Avenue the staff report and poin- bonding which would defer An south in ;ad this 11:`- Jim Nestling, applicant, asked that the Comaissi -n consider holding the requirem=ent for street fighting aLd street trees on lot three until it develops. Mr. kestling indicated that other than that recuest, he had read and understood all other conditions and there was no problem. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commis. ner Remoel stated that he agreed T,itn the applicant because from a practical standpoint there is a chance that the improver-nts will be dataged and would have to be replaced. Mr. Hopson, stated that there might also be further subdivision of this parcel. M^. Rougeau stated that it would be apprn;,__ate not to put in trees or street lights at this time. Commissioner Stout asked if underground electric would be put in at this time. Plann.ag Comaiss`.on Minutes January 12, 1983 11 E_ .J — C1= OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1984 TO: Planning Commission Engineeri,sg Technician FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineeri,sg Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8345 - SERO AMUSEMENT COMPANY - A division of 37.00 acres in o 3 parce s in the MH (Medium High Residential and 0/P (Office /Professional) districts located on t'e northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow, Highway - APN 208 - 341 -01, 04 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Farcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 37 acres of land into 3 parcels, diviGing the me ium high (MH) residential district from the office /professional district. C. Location: The northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route. D. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 10.300 acres Parcel 2 - 16.082 acres Parcel 3 - 10.626 acres E. Existing Zoning: Parcel 1 - office /professional district Parcel 2 - medium high residential district Parc_1 3 - medium high residential district F. Existing Land Use: Vineyard. G. Surrounding Land Use: North - vacant South - unused golf course East - K -Mart Store Wiest - existing industrial uuilding. H. Surroundin Gencral Plan and Development. Code _-�i natians: Nort - o :ce /pro essiona 3strict /hiH res�dentaa South - industrial park, subarea 6 last - industrial park, subarea 6 'Vest - r .2dium high (") district IT=M H Environmental September 12, Page 2 Asp :ssment and Parcel Map 8.345 15 34 I. Site Characteristics: Project is a vineyard at the present time. This site slopes souther y at about II. ANALYSIS: This Parcel Map was tentatively approved as a 2 -lot parcel map on February 8, 1984 anc is now being resubmitted to divide 37 acres of land into 3 lots. Parcel 1 remains as before to separate the Office /Professional District from the Medium High Residential DisLrict per the Development District Map. Parcels 2 and 3 are the future sites for an apartment complex as shown on the attached conceptual site plan. The change to two apartment parcels is requested in order to facilitate phased purchase of the property. The Conditions of Approval for this map are the same as t' ,e for the previous map except for language changes to include the new parcel and Condition No. 5, Page 1 which is now necessary to insure a cohesive residenti -31 development and Condition No. 2, Page 2 which would be needed if the residential development is phased. In addition, if Parcel 2 or Parc =1 3 is developed prior to Parcel 1, the entire length of Arrow Rojte will be constructers. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review ani consideration is Part o t.e m tial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the enviro"ent ;.l checklist, and has conducted a field Investigation. upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRE';PONOENCE: Notices of Publ-,c Hearing have been sent to surrounding properly ,iwners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended th.t the Planning Commission consider all input anc; elements of the project. If, after such conside• lion, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of app.-, _.Al as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution 1.ould be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully submitted, 7 LEH ' :jaa Attachments: Hap Tentative & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study 7� El Ll t'sw��.y�, ��p . a wtwe .wor, DOW aIC Ale WE • s�aar � aN � uafn PAINCIL Nos 9345 wff i ■ rmfen ow f Doom" all Lon r B a. lMAM fl, 1� a .OY11a. •Qa�aau r�.9.c �¢c r sue, wmasaa� w nry afs y a�rM, Z no ■ate' mocmmn s � 46P afa m go" O. Mooms m W - I oommIs 0 CtiaCr. CJLaamlas. • S 1 faau: r,.asr - .. • v. tar : n l waa ra ...a .�+^ii'..'^w "~� __ _ _ ww •rr yr.n etcw •rqs - }` 1� • s..ian . � err i V / te••! w•4 � rla � L�.e+ �C.P'�ua.>•a.4G r iwi +.•o. �i w w iiw.c I rw•nYe ��r � �:� w s � c t 'T}4-• e..tann...e. �. r • _. II w,K I ,dz ftecEL i I i r 3'" � �; ,. ��, , � -�-�, -101 �s•: _ �f4 • e 4 f I um.cw..i Ir g' �� Q er.+r�u•e � .w.�.isa ero t w wiw� 'r " 1 I �w r• w� Z�s•r i -an 1�- lym+aw and l� 2 LRM wlf! wlwla>fewQ. _ c2'�1t7L: •RNpAO V: CMS >P/ P•O'� CO. • 7aN1 laM �rr� Q/ f�•W��tp CuG'..MO�.C•A O M �• T..:'d uJGJ 0.091 Cbe ... o�C 4e� Nw CO+.../ Ieoll..i) O /y. t /b.rn Aee S wtvatTy mop M K4f s �1 i M -.r •_ -- .4-. -5- T! 3_ FC ....... ..S.P ��5' ,F: G .......... ... tEaa%� ❑ Ll i �_42 Fc E3 z.l: 't i, E37 Co n ItPI 1..�... f � G D i =C� ilop iL.- GC: —J �— -lop s Ea P. M. :Q m J3 c_ D El M. � r7 r, Ba Future City Full IIIiC; CITY OF RANCHO CL;CA\ IC:�GA P. A ENGINEERING DIVII I ' _ z VICINITI I AP E", EI 19 IIIiC; CITY OF RANCHO CL;CA\ IC:�GA P. A ENGINEERING DIVII I ' _ z VICINITI I AP E", E - - - - - - - - - - - P,0JE it a & — I T �1_ i-k-1 I 11'Flr Lh I as I I I •1 I CIVIC C-7.. � - TY OF RANCHO CL CAN I Nc 'A title; P.M. ..A ENGINEERING Dl-%'ISION VICINITY MAP N page AJ HIP 4RRp�nt I I s r� CITY OF RANCHO CUC.= L,10 \'GA �i P.M. ENGI \EEiiING DI'0';SIQN . � ® VICINITY MAP N page ti CI ^Y OF P3NCr.6 CUC--•IONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the depart=ent where the Project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part Ii of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) she project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional infors.a,,-.icr report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. ® PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Par =e1 Map No. 3345 11 APPLICANT'S N;L%E, ADDTLSS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT:_ 1V1?1yp1_17 A ;W-7,�n LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS ARID ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Nor *.hwest Corner of Haven Ave. & Arror Rte.— tisse =sors ParZeI77 o- w - _, „ 0, LIST OTI' -ZR PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGEtdC': ISSUI'IG SUCH PERMITS: San Bernardino County Dust Control I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: it is oroposee; to :onsolidate th tour parcets e „YisLin� of .ano redivi c into tao. -- ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 40.35 Acres, gr -ss DESCRIBE THE ENGIRONMENT2,7, SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLA`3PS (TREES) AN"MALg, ANY CULTURAL, hISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AtiD THE DESCRIPTION; OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Project site is a .iTeyard at present time. true ing Lira is ocated co the west, another vineyard is on the north, is on c_ e) is side or Haven Ave. co the East and ! ,� nurse loot in user is co the south. a anzha Gulf ere are no cu turat, .,� ort_al or sent aspects of Is the project part o£ a larger project, one of a series °= cumulative actions, which althouch individually small, may as a whole have signiticai: environmental impact? I -2 I] 11 C1 I WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise ox vibration? _ 3. Create a subst -antial change in demand for -- municipal ser-rices (police, fire, water. sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan des i gnat: io.ls? 5. Remove any existing trees? How many' 6. Create the reed for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla.mables or exmlosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: s - _ IMPORTANT: if `the project - ,nvolves the construction of residential units, complete the forn on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached ax- hibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my abil-ity, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understana that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can oe made by the Development Review Cormittee. Date !!.� 4 !�; Signature �( %r /,Yf�l!y:�/ 1 t Title .-s• "Z `, , -_ 1-3 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date propccz�d to begin ccnstrLctior.: 4. Earliest date of cccupancy: Model and # of Tentative 5. Eedrooss PricPric =nQ,_ 1 -4 z it l E E RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCT 10\ The Following info rnation should'be provided t the City Planning g ivision i .7 n Omer to aid in Of Rancho Cuc_ -oaga district to acco- TOdat =_ the assessinc: `he abJ of the schcol proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No_: NA Specific Location Of project.: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOT ?.L 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date propccz�d to begin ccnstrLctior.: 4. Earliest date of cccupancy: Model and # of Tentative 5. Eedrooss PricPric =nQ,_ 1 -4 z it l E E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUm3ER 8345 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8345) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8345, submitted by Sero Amusement Company and consisting of 3 parcels, located on the northwest c'7-ner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route, being a division of Lots 15 and 16, Section 11, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, according to Map of Cucamonga Lands, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, Records of San Bernardino County, Caii'ornia; and WHEREAS, oil August 21, 1984, a formal application was subritted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on September 12, 1984, the Planning Coatmission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED Z Fm' OWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: ®I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physicaily suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivisi a and improvements w-"'! not cause substantial environmental damage, pub..,: healtn problems or have adverse Jfects on abutty, g property. AINk SECTION 2: ;hat this project will not create significant adverse environmental— Impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on September 12, 1984. SECTION 3: "ihat Tentative Parcel Map No. 8345 :s approved subject to t -,: recommend-!d Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. SECTION 4: Tentative Parcel Map 8345, approved on February 8, 1984, is hereby rescinded. H �1 APPROUEf AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stcct, Chairman ATTEST: Rick GoD:-_ Deputy Secretary i. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forecioirg Resolution was duly and regular'.y introduced, passed, and ad,pted � the. Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamo '-.y M nga, at a regular meeting of the Planning 00mmissicn held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1] Ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECMMDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: Northwest corner of Haven Avenue TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 140: 8345 and Arrow Route DATE FILED: 8/21/84 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A division of Lots 15 NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 and 16 Section 11 T1S R7W according GROSS ACREs.GE: 37 to T ^ap of Cucamon a Lards, as per let ASSESSOR PARCEL NO: 208- 341,01,04 recor in Book , Page ecor s o an erne: ^dino County re'*o r* e****#*! c** iric* ic** at*** int* ic** *iririt* * *at+ *ic** * * *.k * **tlnt DEVELOPER OWNER ENGINEER /SURVEYOR Sero Amusement Co. Lincoln Property Co. _ Associated Engineers and 7a fain Corp. At-7n-----P-au tau -eves 520 N. Euclid Avenue 10100 Santa Monica 316 East "E" Street uite Ontario. CA ;1761 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Ontario CA 91762 Improvemenc and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipp "t Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited ® to, the following: _Dedications and Vehicular Access X 1. infer of Dedication shall be made on the north side of the property for 1/2 width of Civic Center Drive. Offer must line up with existing centerline of Civic Center Drive. X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: 50 additional feet an Arrow Route additional feet on additional feet on X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards: 24 -foot radius at Haven Ave. and Arrow Rte. X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated on Haven Avenue and Arrow Route per Planning Commission Resolution No. 78 -29. X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensurina access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall,be provided by C.C.&R.s prior to building permit issuance. -1- t3 X 6. All existing easements lyino within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's is requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance (see Condition #11 on Page 5). X 2. A lien agreement m;tst be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: for 1/2 median island on Haven Avenue. X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completie: of all on -site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Diviscn prior to issuance of building permit. Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. I. Construct f: ;ll street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. X 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct the fallowing missing improvements: Prior to building permit issuance for Parcel 1, 2 and 3 (see Condition #11 on Page 5) Cur Street Name Gutter A.C. Pvmt. 1 e- Drive Walk �Appr. Street 5tr t I A. C. Fled ian Trees Lights (Overlay Island* Otheri Haven X X X X X X Lien Arrow X I X X X X j X Civic Center] X X X X X X - inciuues ianoscapirg and irrigation on meter -2- H 1�1 C X 4- Prior to ar,y work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from, the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5, Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6. Developer shall coortinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12K! or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9, Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative popes with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and ® approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall riot cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- Grading X I. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Euilding Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. x 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whicheier comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from ether agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Food Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans/ an Bernardino County Flood Control District. X b. Approvals have not been ;szured frog all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -4- X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. If Parcel 2 or 3 develops first, Arrow Route shall be constructed from the westerly property line to Haven Avenue. X 12. A Master Plan for all three parcels shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the development of any individual parcel. The Master Plan shall be processed concurrently with any development application and shall indicate possible building locations, circulation, reciprocal access, parking and drainage. CITY OF i2ANCHO CJCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: N-17 CITY OF RAINTCHO CUCAMONGA or MEMORANDUM 11 DATE: 'September 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner 197-1 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12621 - RICNUOOD - A residential development of 90 townhouse units on 7.85—acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -1,', du /ac' located on the south side of Arrow between Madrone and Baker - APN - 207 - 261 -07. BACKGROUND: Per the attached letter, the property owners for the above described project have withdrawn their consent for the applicant to process Tentative Tract 12621. As the Commission will recell, a similar situation arose regarding the K & B proposal within Victor a. The City Attorney's opinion at that time was that without the property owner's consent the City could not act to approve the project. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission has the following options: (1) continue this item to allow the owners and the applicant time :.o resolve this matter, or (2) deny the project without prejudice. Staff recommends that this item be continued to the next agenda of September 26, 1984. Jgspectiy;Jft submitted, R C RG:CC:ns Attachment: Letter from Applicant ITEM I �Z JACQUTA.5'\ S. 1101_2 C.C.1.M. >ta.g0: .tltl0 is September 6, 3984 Mr. Rick Gomez City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rarcho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7. T {•, ..i . QP RE: Processing of TT 12621 on 7.85 acres at the southwest corner of Arrow Highway and Madrone. Dear Mr. Gomez: The owners of the above described property, J. Alvin Musser, et al, previous- ly gave their consent for Richwood Development, Inc. of 265 N. San Gabriel Blvd., Pasadena, CA, to process a map on their property. 1, Jacquelyn B. Holz, as Agent representing the above referenced owners and acting on their behalf, do herein give notice to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the owners herewith withdraw their consent for the processing of TT 12621. I would greatly appreciate your immediate cooperation regarding this request. If I may be of assistance to ;,,u concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call. ,- spectfuily yours, % J�cquelyn B. golz v�CIM /GRI JBH :smb cc. Jack Lam, Director of Comnurity Devleopment Jon D. Mikels Marjorie E. Mikels J. Alvin Musser Hope I. Musser r-1 U s INVESTORS REALTY SERVICE 43A NO SECOND AVE. • UPLAND. CA 91766 CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1 T Z tm DATE: September 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12621 - RI MOOD - A residential development of 90 townhouse units on � acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du /ac) located on the south side of Arrow between Mad -one and Baker - APN 207 - 261 -07. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. ® B. Purpose: Development of 90 townhomes. C. Location: Southeast corner of Arrow and Baker (Exhibit "A "). D. Parcel Size: 7.85 acres of land. E. Project Density: 11.5 du /ac. F. Existino Zoning: Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). G. Exis':ing Land Use: Vacant. H. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: (Exhibit "B "). Nort', - Single family residences; Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac) . South - Single family residential; Low Medium Residential (4- 8 du /ac). East - Single family residences; Medium Residential (8 -14 du /ac). West - Single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). I. General Plan Designations: Pro -i-Ect Site - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac). North - Proposed park site. South - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac). East - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac). West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). _ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment &. TT 12621 - Richwood September 12, 1984 Page 2 11 J. Site Characteristics: The project site slopes to the southeast uniformly at approximately 2' grade. Vegetation is limited to indigenous shrubs and weeds. No structures exist on the property. K. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits townhomes in the Medium Residential District at 11.5 dulac under the Optional Development Standards. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project site ?Ian has been designed with primarily a four unit building configuration, however duplexes have been provided along the north side of Richwood Drive to provide transition of density and neighborhood compatibility with the existing duplexes on the south side of Richwood Drive. Floor plans have been arranged in two -story and s"ngle- story configurations with 798 square foot two - bedroom floor plans in the end units and 1,118 square foot three - bedroom floor plans in the middle units. Recreation facilities will include a pool, tot lot, spa, and open lawn area. Access to the project will be provided from both Madrone Avenue and Baker Avenue. B. Issues: The primary issue is neighbori1eod compatibility in Terms of architectural design; scale, bulk and building height, identity and ne ghborhood character, etc. The City's design guidelines require harmonious building style, form, size, color, material and roofiine with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed elevations are designed in a Mediterranean architectural style with expanses of unadorned stucco exteriors, and portions of flat roof treatment. Although this style is generally attractive, it contrasts with the character of `he surrounding neighborhood. The contrast will be greatest aiv3._- Richwood Drive and Baker Avenue. The duplexes on the south side of Richwood Drive are characterized by lap or shingle siding, pop -out windows, wood trim and stucco with wood plant -ons, see Exhibit "K ". These duplexes Were carefully designed to appear as a large single family detached residence. Therefore, staff recommends that the elevtions be redesigned to reflect the surrounding neighborhood character. The secondary issue is site planning and transition of ensity. The increased density ti l-5 dulac will be perceived most along Richwood Drive and Baker Avenue, see Exhibit "B ". The proposed townhomes are significantly larger in height and bulk than the adjacent one -story single family detached homes and duplexes that front onto Baker and Richwood, respectively. To address this concern, th% applicant has .1-1-11 ' 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment & TT 12621 - Richwood September 12, 1954 Page 3 prepred an alternative site plan with one -story duplexes along Richwood. Extensive landscaping will be providcl along Baker Avenue to mitigate the transition of density. C. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee felt that the Mediterranean style architecture and site plan were acceptable subject to the following: 1. Providing extensive landscaping treatment around the project perimeter and at project entries, including berming, specimen size trees, landscaped medians, and texturized paving to buffer the project from surrounding lower density residences. In addition, the Committee recommended that any perimeter walls receive a decorative treatment. 2. Provide contour grading and extensive landscaping along Richwooa Drive to help mitigate the slope height and appearance. 3. Shift pool location to provide a larger, open lawn is area in the center of the project. D. Development Review Committee: This Committee and the Grading Committee were concerned with flood protection along Arrow Route because of the existing natural drainage channel that drains perpendicular to Arrow to the north. Both Committees recommend that a two -foot high flood protection wall be provided along Arrow as shown in Exhibit "I ". Further, the Grading Committee expressed concern that the proposed duplexes along Richwood Drive will be 5 -E feet higher than the street. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and it is attached for your review. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed building design and site plan are consistent with the regulations of the Development Code and General Plan policies. Further, the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed and the construction of this project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has beer, advertised as a Public Hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. JL_ —S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RE ORT Environmental Assessment & TT 12621 - Richwood September 12, 1984 Page 4 U. RECOMMENDATION: It is recnmmended that the Planning Commission consider all material and elements of this project. If after such ccnsideration the Commission can support the Facts fc. Finding and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. ubmitted, Planner RG:DC:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit ' °F" - Lardscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Elevations Exhibit "H" - Phasing Plan Exhibit "I" - Arrow Section Exhibit "„" - Grading Detail Exhibit "K" - Tract 9658 - Elevations Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions � s 11 r 1 U L. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEE: -) be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment .: Fee: $67.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: t) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TRACT 12621 RICHWOOD TOWNH0MSS APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Richwood Development Co. 265 N_ San Gabriel Blvd, Pasadena CA 011(17 (818) 79S -c189 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Dick MacLeod 265 N. San Gabriel Blva. Pasadena, CA 91107 (818)795-5189 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) AP No. 2C7- 261 -07 South side Arrow =eetween Baker & Madrone LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Tentative Nap Approval PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 90 unit Townhome project to be develoned in 3 phases. Product rn ,.c omes and 3 bedr attached ara es. Buildings shall be two n — unit at-muct interiors Streets will a private and are to be maintained y Homewownersurp.s. Association. Footprint of building plus patio to be conveyed to homeowner. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 7.85 Acres 50 Units 798 sf t garage Units st + garage DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIl+.ALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The property is basically a bare site sloping at about 2 1/2/, from Arrow Street to the Sout a slue has no known evironmental sensitivc features Surrot•naing properties inciu e a church at the corner, Tract to the South, commercial to the SE, houses and bare land to the East, No:th�West. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? -6. % 1-2 '� D 1A, 0 r WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ h 1. Create a substantial change in ground ccntours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X _ 3. Create a substantial change in da:.and for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials slich as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits pr-"sr-rt the data and informati._,n required for this .nitial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submit-led before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date % fr ai/ Signaturec�.`�� Title 1-3 �� L RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to Planning Division in the City of Rancho Cucamonc_a order to aid in district to accommodate the assessing the ability of the school proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: 12621 Specific Location. of Project: PHASE i PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL I. Number of single family units: 60 2. Number of multiple family units: 30 32 8 ?" 90 3. Date proposed to begin construction: Jan. 1, 198; April 1.1985 Julyl5, 1985 4. Earliest date of April 15, July 15., Nov.!, occupancy: 1985 1985 1985 Model and # of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range 798 Sq.Ft. S63,900.00 1118 Sq.Ft. $73,900.00 I -4 10 y' 2!j m I=C m LM IL 1 ® - etc*%. GC CITY OF RANYCHO CUCAVIONGA PLANNING MM EN ITE\ I: 1 1t7 (� NK)RTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCATMONGA PLANNING DIVISION V NORTH E El 1TE.\1 -_ X12 62 TME-EXM AJMLlZATCt-,r �2 I M 1 t_f 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCATMONGA PLANNING DIVISION V NORTH E El 1TE.\1 -_ X12 62 TME-EXM AJMLlZATCt-,r �2 r u ic I ! f I II ARROW - flCJTE � � }_j� `�� rF',. ,l ', a`r�v i�, a��.I�Y��i'iv1a :�a�L�••L.l� at § r •_ I • � � wT R f � - -, L. A' Y Y ° Ait ••yam ��' {r_ P -- i "5!T= •RtCnWDOD' DIME CITE' OF meal: _ R ANCHO CUCA1. ONL GA TrrLE: PLANNING DIVOON EXHIPXr- l , / r 1' SCALE- -j�'IS L' ✓ V NORTH E. CITE' OF R.AllCHO C CANIONGA PLANNI \`r aria : j ^nN TI"iU. y, I A( NOM 0 0 l CITY Or RANCHO CUCANIONUA PLANNING DIXISKYN iTE\i: Etxirrr: Fe . scALE: ool i,1S NORTH rLl �•- ��..��..4 _ARROW Cb . I � -_ Iry I ` < `� : '° r ~�L�i• v �� r v!'� a I y; :, V f n I �. % i-•i� �. ,. ,� I C' I fI -=f•. "�'- so ,'i .•1 °. = I'E. '.is5ii j 1 {p, •I' I jT) u 1 nV �- �. 9 �, a I� I -o ° �l+ ` 1 a .y L.y JI i II�n i�Nu1 m8�71 ILI ... �� RxrWOOO omve I - Jl NIOE H CITY OF RAI'CHO GLTCA1101�G� TITLE. _ PLANNING DIVEKAN EXHIBIT= l SCALE: J, / % E CITY OF RANCHO Ct;CANION`GA PLANNING DIVLSMI ITE'P: ! oz TITP_E: SGALE: T -I � V� NORTH ARROW ROUTE F. } 1r I Q } _ 111_ �J , ICiI I I rJ} d r.G Cn✓ n tf i! WI u• CITY OF RANCHO CUCATMONGA PLANNING DIVISKIN — 1Q! 0 , G� NORT"ri ITEM: TTTLE: E\I3II3IT] SOLE. �_a8 LJ U 0 P_ ,,=Oc c ns :.+ r 2• r i- 4:.ROS:i�PE I / bi "t SECTION A —A A�Fow CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIO \OA PLANNING DIX ISION Tula B- 3 ITE:N I: EXHIBIT: -= SCALE= i �9 FORTH F] .1l • � ^ tee Cie TO ' S9 68 67, 20i - �� - I3 9_ 15 45 17 f A. if I •\, ^•• R w �L 1 RIc14VV CB DR 6r EE 7 �j NORTH CITY OF ITE \I: _T I &Zo r RAI`:CI -IO CL'CAl IO \GA TITLE: Ri• NNI,NG DIVISION EXHIBIT: - SCALE: � - zo C Ll 2 ME 41- i) bo v MR - -- a G&.YylB('r �K� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12621. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12621 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Richwood Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision for townhome purposes on 7.85 acres of land located on the southeast corner of arrow and Baker into 93 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action or, Sepember 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: ® SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12621 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. C Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project the environment issued. will not create adverse impacts on and a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 72521, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved si+bject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Provide extensive landscaping around project perimeter including berming, specimen -size trees, and landscaped medians ano texturized pavement at project entrances. Any perimeter walls shall be decorative. 2. Provide dense landscaping adjacent to Wits 4 and 5, 3 and 9, and 90 and 71, to enhance the interior streetscape appearance. 3. Construct sidewalk connection from on -site to Baker Avenue between Units 84 and 85. Further, sidewalks at Baker and Madrone entrances shall wrap around to connect with interior sidewalk system. 4. A pedestrian corridor shall be provided with a continuous sidewalk from Baker Avenue to Richwood Drive along the southerly tract boundary. The final landscaping, grading, lighting and any fencing shall be designed to create an attractive, open pathway. Final design details shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5. interior sidewalks along front and sides of garages shall be replaced with landscaping. 6. Eliminate sidewalk on north side of Richwood Drive to accommodate contour grading and extensive landscaping to soften slope appearance. 7. The pool location shall be adjusted to provide a larger open lawn area. S. Slope banks ir excess of five (5) feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and soften their appearance as follows: one 15- gallon or larder size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, one 1- gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of eight (8) feet in vertical height and o7 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5- gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting shall include as .permanent '.rrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. I] E �1 LI Resolution No. Page 3 El 9. The 2 -foot flood protection wall and any perimeter wall along Arrow Highway shall be constructed with decorative block, pilasters and trim cap. The final design and construction details shall be submitted to Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. Phase I constru.tion shall include Richwood Drive street improvements, including street trees. Further, lots 5 -18 facing Richwood Drive shall have construction and landscaping priority and be completed within Phase I. 11. Detailed elevations of all sides of each building type (4- plex, duolex, etc.) shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. Particular attention shall be made to provide compatibility with surrounding neighborhood character. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 12. Madrone Avenue at the intersection with Arrow Route shall be constructed as a full width intersection, per City standards, including curb returns, cross gutter and proper transition on Arrow Route to the satisfaction of the Citv Engineer. 13. The existing excess pavement after the realignment of Madrone Avenue (east side) shall be removed. The street section shall be constructed on the east half of the street to match existing pavements south of the subject development. 14. The improvements on Baker Avenue shall include a pavement transition per City standard at Lne noi`.h et11 of the development. 15, Surplus lands on the east side of Madrone Avenue at Arrow Route shall be dedicated to eta City as street right -of- way for Madrone Avenue. 16. The final grading shall be prepared with the following revisions: a. Acceptan::e of drainage from adjacent properties to the northwest shall be provided. b. Arrow Route protection walls and landscape section shall incorporate a minimum 2 foot block deflection wall mounding and sidewalk combination to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17. Building pad grades along Baker Avenue shall be higher than top of curb for adequate flood protection. . Resolution No. Page 4 18. Interior c:riveways shall be constructed with a crown section and curb and gutter to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the °lanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMIMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: T. I E 1 N, O ® U O r« D �jL�T «LN N ^l T 70 •�_ N -w- •JP• ^iU 7P•r y c u° c o p qr qlT O-O r Z', -q�0 «u 'fNJ L.��a N� l 2 V L G N C O l V � _ ✓ ` ° G � O V O n r G O^ .� � •b.. d �� en�V rC� •�G 'J c Jew'.',. aL �e ` nT`T_ me o _ �� L^J• =_ =cu •✓ •nom � L e q S EC C2Vy � Zyj q�C'J CN�T ..n - ✓•.l Vp0'V QrG�- C �G L w...- rO�TOV'00 d_COVT VGA L= d. CVL 64:JV [ V 9 _ V jdd T i k N C V O ✓ _ .9 C'.. q V' � F . G u 0 .• ." - - E c r _ 1 r >.r u e V. 1 V VOi -VVga O_9gl`q Ou.Ti� c 7 o � C L � Jrd 0 I C` CC��SN�LT o CVy`p a �rFgeL rIO ••O :�� om' VjG�U�EO�'1aN ✓✓ CV9VO Z�V I -i+ �r0 �V'N ' �E.° ✓ ✓� O =qq t q 0` O G n ✓ G M N °� b O✓ U � V C .« C y. u'+ O N ✓ •J .j 6l O q 9 G6 V r br _� •C �> G O N C � N f 0 q -7 V 7Nr2Jr. a °� NNE p E=V_b G O�.GCi v•� c-° - - V -rte y" ^�=LO� ,•J 9,o`6Y .yq0 +¢qd j.nt O - p g p l U O G G L C ••Ca N r j Q J •>`' O L q N l P N rQ G O V T Q✓ M L _U C U q O NdV - C q C_ ✓ _ 6 V .✓n L n r J C- O P G N 9C ✓ N_ �♦ ��a >G 7rJ� Nq C P q.-. CEn CVjo N dr�V�O J ='N q6 C G 0� L n n0 r C r L r -�� PLC -�N r U CT ^J q -�'N °+✓ ••C L ` r C ^N U�^ - L � n0 q -`� VT d -L�U nd- N^ bT�O✓ G- rV9gy0 U 9 C� ✓��.- rL�UV. N�O G67 q. NV9.lVN G� M Or [.L N�VO Gjj°rN G >� p•rG Cy O'�COG r C� ra. rGtOJrG q✓ ... Of•+ q •qi Oar � ✓� � ^QEQ -_ O >Nt NOq r 6' �.�T OOV GN✓�V d iNb dL V_L OqN -J �� U N .dr V + q _- q r Z n V O C� U �✓ � O I V^ ✓ g q 9 V T V 0.= V r_ ✓ I .l. C M r 6 u O J V l 9 M - N �J O a V V S- w 6 �• •-a GD S N O+ - O O L ^• ¢ 6 •� d✓ V O g N � L O. r G V 6 q CS O. vI uI 1 I � 1 O Y W 6 J Y N 0 0 ^ O O Z LJ 25 O V ¢ O C r W N a N A, « s - � O u � � =� c Q7 6 V 0. O I J t 2 Uq Cr ..i c u° c o p •nom � L e q S G R gi n � q �. C - JOCrVUNC L w...- 9 _ V jdd T ' VN VOi -VVga • � �Or 4€ I C` CC��SN�LT o � —I a �rFgeL rIO ••O :�� om' I G H�� ✓ Oyu Cj -� 9 G L C N i.0 `. ✓jJ G� � q q6 MVC G'J ✓ O >✓ �06.r -Cr G O `O V'•J PG`O V u � 6C OV �•N..0 V ♦C✓ C•Vn J O•J^ O O {.q .�jCaLC "' q J - L d l l N L T M✓ F Cj � - G 6' v � N +•• a `+n' L t Pd> ]� a F�ao » W C V gOgTC ONN Nq L V VM,� •f JAN _ Gage �Nr •. .n= ^V OYr NOGr- q SN r C O LC T I ��CI °Or <.C�D �q-> OCN �FG OnL MCC s_ reru c• be�'NL LL ev:- -. �` e.ro .o Gq L u.. _">.� >dN vqb_ •� W C__ g L r L S V °> t G L U _4 T v W T Y n O 1°.t C j -.� C _ Oq _q C_yL —�"O 4C•C� WGr �— � C_JU G q`NC UVq r_N �qC .L 06 r� GdVN — L_Gd >CG r= 4r o —NV ^J'br ,< V°U, L S v g 6 C L' a...0 L C O 7 V V A G q GO^ —° •� °,GO rz nt N c 4 L � G cr yr "" LN Ear. �. �.°.:N�° O ,z °vu a� �o�r PAL .GO V.ur a �t N r Li >p <.• q Mi+� a rvN r n.°. �G c dar. r C V. W O` _d V X� � r d� N S .. C ` r d � N. 9 t L L C L ^.a •Ja G uN. G G C V>_ O u ^OVr•CN rV -C C� _J�t{• �q�G •nagG> O d V u_ V q � b V ` r i V° C >. O V q � J N d 2 C O• C W J V C gYiFv _�PE�r rr b —C > EN -3 CU 6�S•— Ord V O° > G y N � a� O V JJ p9p-aC N.ri.r V-J4V Ofj1 4 CgC9¢GQn'�= PV_W V VgCG n�wF� Yrq� 6uniVd. N.`. V°.wl ZtMd4° VI 2r3: °�C WCIIr dC ••PVC ._�Sa ._L £.C-. b � C N n _ C l M 6r C a qg� V q•CO °° y �� •Vr9Vyr M T qNC C< CNC Cr Lqi tG,i .L.. _r ��rorr 4NC ^„G�qN C n y T= S G G S V U6 `W _dgOe C_P C G° NrC G4° CO q Nr-/ G 6E C 6 G q V q y L0 N L L —L aVi .rGyE. 9S6 ri ✓V LL° v C` �� i VO `< L:2 C '° cr M 7 b r l C q V l C 6 C N q qv S� qa` �GVC PLO G > Cry' L L G q Fq r4C .r. 20 �C OS fj �' r4 c�q_q VOS C °r >LV qNW Nj N_r • C `N °.q a°iJS `.n':= OC 4P Vc0 _9C q0 rgGC GC °Cr° qi e C N P o t v 9 Y C- V V r> r_ C °> ' V P> N T V O w a qPq> rV L� V aL g0✓NUC O VJC�.nc 60 V � C rEE `• 4 q G 6 E. L G O .. r-, 6 C) o_ n aG n - aoc �� pc q='q sio4o co _ c Ny r0 N L �[ E n��✓ V pY r�y0 p ° 6 q� G •� G q G 4 4Gu L gJ�VV E 4 e. ° .Li• g V O U :u c= ._rte o C G - =c av O °^ 9J O api _ gY�W4 �•(�`,''^^� Cy OCO «G N N q- q- N � �b0 Tuoc J o L _ ^u� o =moo =n✓ pP7 w�yAE✓ �a'UO Ly V n' O� � N -r b 4 ¢ J�O- V a 90G O -d O 4 O C <' L ✓ `t O r C` _ g 0 O V O q U J C U-J q •n D E q .� L J �•_ "_ L O } �� L y N Y . Y S } C w' L2 •�.O a V __ ✓_ ^"'' r _ P O r a C G _ t. C V �_ cy�_\ C} p ^u• � �� O l ✓ d = q dTGa ' O��« C — N V �,b 1 ja ° i Ll b= {J O c q ✓ AV � O V -L. w. G � r u C G — n _ P � P .W.• q 'y C Cr L T— } = 6n. ^ � q j q G OCOL PnO ay.r__ U� «�jq 2 =0G V a COQ lV✓ e yu'"G --a ra V �L{ .-= O N•w 000 —C Cb OYr qUN Ty .v c r LJa'c G v c ✓� iia .v uy d 'O VTb a _ J1✓ q0 ac�y Ga �— O � y L py •" G =' •n <LC wOGd CVr+ —a O lCq E u Vp�N V «V _ q c q E- i n W E � a' � .n A yVy w p ✓ •-• L r� .J y «c _ y Y° ' G � L — P✓ b X 6 0 Y C .L.. t C `✓✓ L r GG6._Ji• G �9V1 96• ff`= C' q C r Y' ° 9y VJOL O ?_ O n Y° _ U V aLfa .Jn Yc ✓ N L ` �� o m N^ q L r« =L GV V P i °L� N•nN qc ^c�' CNL =�q�u tv NO - uvai N u v c Dui c-'bac ua o F 6 V •Lr. l q° G ✓ V - ✓� L p L C yVa6M � M �• y V �� O b} N L N Yb N N ^� O ✓ C`PL 6�L✓ Pq A O. T A Y q�dC G6�lG V q GC iV q V� «2 aE ✓L' C }T✓. O a ` « V a60 O GN O P✓« O O N O^ i y} ✓ q SO «cy r .• - qT ,°•.. �' G ca C o b v r PqP icbu ��'- c <c <NG r0' q LL OL Mt 09 � CV6�T 9 q L= bd � ri6 «_ q✓ V E O 0 4 O✓ q 0 "r le q O a o G p G O •°r } e` r =< v i� 9 O__ E e�`I — N 7 G tf < Y O ri p d V N« T c✓ a c i V « ✓Vd ✓ Y a b 0<0 r. T a C G q 1 UL N C 4 C --. y G qV L✓O O U < _MV «N N O M V� a ✓ y ✓� q a G u✓• W ` S 4 � ' r � O� y C a L i y C O C O` «« Y V V— O L n,Pb V J n q r O L -c - o_ _-•. V qu d p ✓ r l 9 P— ✓ ✓ q u^ PLC_ GOL rF Ur dOy U`� O rlt. C`C Llri ¢ O w P.OLa qOy— 4L 6d O —q _qV G`OL qi W r-, 6 C) o_ aG n - aoc �� pc q='q sio4o co _ c Ny r0 N L �[ E n��✓ V pY r�y0 p ° 6 q� G •� G q G 4 � L J[ O G .Li• g V O U N d� V `� ^ C G �• ✓ py O P L G N N q- N � �b0 V =n✓ p�0 w�yAE✓ �a'UO Ly V n' O� Gc G 4 L yyyN =Cr n Eq °v NFL -J��c} °'- � -�,�,• Kf "„ "_ 4� a v iuL> c OVVVVVV111111 �O N dTGa �,b 1 ja LO ObG �rcVi l✓NO i° ra V �L{ .-= O N•w 000 —C � °V OYr qUN r =V rb NC6y 7 <1 qN V = •n <LC <n 6� 6q CNgV pP O L POT p C O G N ��°' p O N yVy w Y^ «c N O t2 Y C C n c r GG6._Ji• G �9V1 96• :y Y' ° 9y VJOL y�Ca r_4 On v �c Yc G �a.d'. o m °'°•„r cq.e f Gm V a sL-•O w �cCO FjO.O�i °L �.•Y N Q V O C� ._j F 6 .� .`..L V u• U `J O u� G O J d � � G L G T^ ✓ FC 6�L✓ Pq A VV NVT C G Ca PC l .'O `- V q y d S l y C 6•� 6 O i - UJ q SO d i 9 q O N N T 41 Mt 6L0 � C0 cNON CI'pq � ri6 EO TO NOC VL �O O O U a q dT U i G✓ U E e�`I LC= Y Gu°• T -I C' c✓ a c a •... G ✓ Y a b 0<0 1 UL r00• --. qV L✓O U O O— _MV C� E NT' wi _�o c n,Pb M L -c - o_ _-•. V.gcC qu d \r, p vq GL q u^ PLC_ GOL rF Ur dOy U`� O rlt. C`C Llri ¢ O w P.OLa qOy— 4L 6d O —q _qV G`OL qi yc� YOq q yT " V Or PPV r0 FL -' V.if q''V .... u �N q OS c_ -y L.. GAG Gc � �a✓ r .`°_ ✓c Mir >v n °• u `Y u L° M -.L.00 uqb n b c N � -o'n LI rE .'• R o .-..�. r ai.w Loq a p ✓b o ° o a GV «� i J O•L. d.✓ °« >, c9: TLGN cu cvi o q ¢ Gq .: d.+o ns Sa• —i•o r � r,^ c..� � «s a Y I �j NI �I N) O Y u O E E �f - fur• ci_ r o0 0_. _= p `__ �� -_ c u° � " may`.. c^ M o ..= -� u•�.^. ° d a J 4 n l G ' r a= ^— V JG OVCn V J r 6aJQO Oj °I = �` •- O rO -JN VrV 7` U V``rd COnV� < - - =- �f i q�VN ,C _-_ 0... N ^9 O� rVWV C n J • SJ6pa.r Lrq�O �I Y� a: N 6VL WNy WVV Ez m cy C.aC i yr° . —O T•J Ut — r 6 C n V J l < q > V err V <O (1{1'rO� •�L V ° —° r • LVr do arq C V C V �C> O I` NVOZ VV �< a Et.n V.d.w V cr.L.. O ... o0 cS•. a V= ° c0 c 1 _ = == &Otl n9i -•C L NO NN VLn w 2 �C .�. rSFWq PcO 9�N emu` rO CY V C ' ar .n rd P� rL >.v N'L° `� O 6` T• q t_6 — o c i -_ dw— = Na'- `rC` c o;N :°.. r;C c V —�� d— V�{r mp cld GLrV JOr V ` C J•, PL PE it l• L u O— <nn q O n ^C r C• m V O l O a' i? OL n q N u� M ry�CO c�L.LLO r..rL , Yl Cqi+ aEaE= L4rV �q X004 � <6r d 1�1 6 � 113 1 NG.LOG E E i Y ®N) 1 � 1 � q O • p `yD O. v d r •� � I `� — � i0 4 g N o y 4 _U V LtrNi a 9 I C � T O O w •J r O "" � V p i G— c V _ •� � V ^D 2 d ` pod cr � M' d c .. �•i u c� V P q • y f � g G q' f O� I •�yL• OL — VO Kq OCR G V p N 1 \ b F] •LU• n � - j V c c c u u E D L a`4 L< a6 '=NO =� a c •O• G q L L 4 • r C N � •� OL V _ O > C O a+ Nr� Nr CD a_ aTC dC v.O.. Sc �vO L N L V a •a •Lr• V V � E � L V �' •• V 6 N Q Q t y y 0 [I Co��I E: L� ✓f� z: D N •` _ U O O r>•ZL ' 6�C u �• _q V r 6 r C V C C y,f L D O n a r O V -• < L r rcD V q � u y Q T rD It 2 C •f W V = `Lr Tr Cb7-�u O V q q r L- L T Ln m E ` V L r O C L •V•• r V _ G — O c C O �.q � u T a V V L NI u r 1 V l q� O C C u) b \1 u x 1 V G C S w O O v O G 2 'O C � E q w G ° C S � g_ ti T or � V E O c .• 6 t � L N' ttf =c u Ol�r LcN c u•V.•E C— -N — E n° .d•"• i `u`c °eve = T q dL o - .q••�L Q O � u�i ° 2° 4� V 6 '•uGNT �• O E .d/•pL'�� O r •- O >� cgou o„ .V•N VL O r9O� �O W L° CAL D.O.ra V yL` V° 2Jr q l V_C b DI'. p0 O�rV• sQ —r•q ° °"yr a.uirT ° - u2 °`.. c� aq a ` L < •'emu.. _ • dY� Loa. ` —J— o � •°`a Z oz 4_ ` •� =Y r G� � .V. V. -O � LSdO� •.O.O VCV.��•1 O e a} •• O• L O C O L N P- q N T V N C C _ °c `ol c -•_ T _ c �c vo. c;crc b. ._ .. S c p .i aJ T C M — O >• O r C •'n _ GN cn � C-•J V N C — Oq —C V °-JO DV T T L" •J g a w r V V J z T` T C t Ta = C P O L A C "rLCV g O O n O O u• O q c O •. •. O M g r S Vq E V PCP•+ pOC _dt O O v�•V.rr% tCn�O dOLN VwV —V•O'a 'J P� CO� O w�gTP _ r dM V V -- N•. O O V O` OP• vC V L E� JO4w 6VC> > •O qC q— C�a¢ _ ~G••.`lr " O V VV V n Q N r [I Co��I E: L� ✓f� z: D N •` _ U O O r>•ZL ' 6�C u �• _q V r 6 r C V C C y,f L D O n a r O V -• < L r rcD V q � u y Q T rD It 2 C •f W V = `Lr Tr Cb7-�u O V q q r L- L T Ln m E ` V L r O C L •V•• r V _ G — O c C O �.q � u T a V V L NI u r 1 V l q� O C C u) b \1 u x 1 V G C S w O O v O G 2 'O C � E q w G ° C S � g_ ti T or � V E O c .• 6 t � L N' ttf `v O Y V G 0 L d b u c < r c r� � E V- 1 a� s' NOb L S` `CLpy G ✓ ^O 6� ^i• C � q F ` Na >• �✓1• L c W CV CO_ ✓ "' ` V� CC. V �y� =` ` 11 0' �' V -n rL. nor a' `` - i --Gi - az• 1 ro ✓y °° ✓° c t u '• c� n- E r �� q n M r nqu Pa `- >e �� •� L V rh' C � u � ro Tr vu d •r _ - p C V V qc °n c= _ O° V O n c of S V O G r q 2 u nb q_W rC U Lq V Gi G C ^ ✓� Vi rn V; °r p� G O V O qy r G.. L I r ✓ C V7W P M _ `� I G i zz C O N G ti � r _ = • b u c < r c r� � E V- 1 O V ` L •q• u ° O v qcN t v O r O d C d G V _ °✓ N - O L T• 6 V G N w c d C V O O _r V r = V A o q d- •n V „ � •PO V V c N b r? d a� s' c ^O 6� C � q F ` Na >• W O V ` L •q• u ° O v qcN t v O r O d C d G V _ °✓ N - O L T• 6 V G N w c d C V O O _r V r = V A o q d- •n V „ � •PO V V c N b r? d C V 11 PV U b �t r �. i r> � q F ` Na >• W L ` CC. V �y� =` n✓ 11 0' �' V -n rL. nor a' `` � - i --Gi - az• ro °° ✓° c t u '• c� n- E r �� q n M r �� •� L u qc °n c= n cu o c of nb I G i zz C G G s O r N b r' •I o• 1 \ I � I � ' C V 11 O v v 0 L d El 6 q n� n9 V V 7 C y V + v E F L q n V PO C C I _ y Wy O d y � C \I Y O V 6 l V ` V O 6 2 r O t _ « ° qW tl V y E V 9 v � _ c _ V S M _ E d a o rL a .e « V 5 P q v d « V �M V P � I oGc �= o o'V � C C d _ ao d V �L✓ O M O q C Y P_ V ,CL 6 O Y ^ T 4 a V L M V p Op C. 6 y V a V w a 9 M V V 0 u v C r? V � 4 c vL � V q C P Ply r t _ TV a y < r Vi GP C � C l 2 y < C q T S C 4 TO q V r r y r q 6 i cq o E E G N C OO y P V V O d C --E + o a � L V «F w C O_ t C Y� q � O C_J y c � „ O V _ r Yu � S + °1 0 M 6 G N ' e= O q L O r _OV n Y G_ a y d L O 7 L T u « y _ 9 2 M r u V u ^Or D G � t w <+ Tr C O o v L a v+ N 0 L u V > L C C q O O ^ q 6 9 E E C a � w d q rL. W V «F L C V t r O O W C_J y « C _ d C O G + = M T y 4 O q L O r _OV Y « a y d M q Y d t E D G � t w <+ Q vd t yY o v L a v+ GE nL uaa - ca °1 Yc _ a � r V ^ V M i ' v p «C q O y � E � V V V y V O O L � L u V > L C q r O ^ q 6 9 E E C a N N q rL. W L V t jVV C �v « _ d q a O d 4 O q L O r _OV Y « a d O E D G � t w O O q u d moo- r a v+ s O C °1 Yc _ a � u L 4 T M i ' v q y � E � L � p C ¢tl i ^ N 0 LJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12772 - MORRIS & SEARLES - The development of 61 single family detached houses on 15.2 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential District (4 -8 du /ac) generally located between Ramona and Turner, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line - APN 1077 - 032 -1, 2, 3, 4. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, eleyations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of 81 single family detached houses. C. Location: Between Ramona and Turner, approximately 1,000 scuth of Base Line. D. Parcel Size: 15.2 acres. E. Project Density:_ 5.3 du /ac. F. Existing Zoning: Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). G. Existing Land Use: Single family residences, agricultural, and vacant. H. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: (Exhibit "B ") North - Single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). South - Single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East - Single family residential; Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) and Low Residential (2 -4 du /2c). West - Single family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12772 - Morris & Searles September 12, 1984 Page 2 El I. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). North - Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) and Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) and Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). J. Site Characteristics: The project site contains an older single family residence, abandoned chicken cages, aud citrus trees which will be removed. The remainder of the site is undeveloped and slopes to the southeast at approximately a 2% grade. K. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits single family detached dwellings in the Low Medium Residential District at 5.3 du /ac under the Basic Development Standards. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project expands upon the previously approved Tract 12601, as shown in Exhibit "C ". The proposed Tract 12772 is basically an extension of the same lot pattern and product type that the Planning Commission previously approved for Tract 12601 in early 1984. The protect has been designed with four different floor plans and a variety of exterior treatments. The 2- 3- and 4- bedroom floor plans range in size from 1,01:. square feet to 1,400 square feet. In addition, a variety of street setbacks have been provided with some lots incorporating side entry garages to help relieve monotony along the st- eetscape. B. Design Review Committee: rr,� Committee was concerned that the original project esign reflecti'-a some of the characteristics of Low Medium residential projects that the Commission has discouraged, such as: lack of variety, repetitive architecture, and domination of the stree"'�cape by garage doors. To mitigate these concerns, the Committer -er.ommended that the applicant explore design mitigation alternative= such as side entry garages, front yard landscaping, roof material variety, introduction of a two -story unit, zero lot line product, and greater undulation in the curvilinear streets. In response to these concerns, the applicant has prepared a revised site plan as shown in Exhibit "D ", which indicates nine lots with side entry garages. is -3-a 11 11 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12772 - Morris & Searles September 12, 1984 Page 3 C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant ani is attached for your review. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and determined that the construction of this project will not cause significant adverse envirormL�ntal impacts. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is consistent with the regulations of the Development Code and General Plan policies. Further, the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed and the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been adverf-�,ed as a Public Hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider all material and input on this project. If the Commission can support the Facts for Findings and Conditions of Approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval woald be appropriate. :DC:ns Attachments submitted, Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "8" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - E:chibit "F" - Exhibit "G" - Exhibit "H" - Initial Study, Resolution of Location Map Site Utilization Map Subdivision Map Detailed Site Plan Landscape Flan Grading Plan Phasing Plan Elevations Part I Approval J-i �; ',; �,A ..- 4 •�: ',.n .�L ; �_h I L. /'. �. r f � I ,' ��'�,,. '. �. � '. �' 1, ).'� • , . . y � .. .�4.. � � �' � r ip� _; ' \ , 1 '.f 1 1 ,� 1 1 1 1 1. f l 1 r \� � '�. a W � _ L � 1 � t 1' \ \ �•. .\ .S ��,�.. 1 ':. ` 4 � � t 1` _ l `' fi � C IA AL- 7-7 I� I I y+ � I r <Oib9G0 :GY��TUC T�� b IYTL C r I 4I t11 L S I f S • it i crryY OF T.,,- -Ir I Z.'77 Z RANCHO CUCANNIONGA T,-r- -: PLANNING DIS'ISIQN EXHlmT scALE: c [V� NOl� S [7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmmo 'GAS PL- vN,NI \G DiNruo` Y 0 TENTATIVE MAP TRACT N0. 12772 1.Z1 r -- TITU-: EXHIB[T= _ LE..- J -� V� \ORTH ILI J r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmmo 'GAS PL- vN,NI \G DiNruo` Y 0 TENTATIVE MAP TRACT N0. 12772 1.Z1 r -- TITU-: EXHIB[T= _ LE..- J -� V� \ORTH r -- TITU-: EXHIB[T= _ LE..- J -� V� \ORTH 0 .1 _ 1 '1'PG4 44YN J'KY.I ✓C4 e!ap!f i IrE rf ---------; i NORTH CITY OF ITEM 1- 7 RANCHO C TCANIO GA T=: t:AT& R PLUNNI TNI G DIVISION EXHIMT- SCALE- a"' �` J IrE rf NORTH CITY OF ITEM 1- 7 RANCHO C TCANIO GA T=: t:AT& R PLUNNI TNI G DIVISION EXHIMT- SCALE- a"' �` J E =�-,_ � � { Cam• I: --� ''• I(: I �,��I.ct�� 1 is 1 I t L IVI t I p LLI � lZil Lp Yi Lam, L ;fs �- t -c- F1 t � i I , I f ,' • �- 1 ' � { v I _�` ] I I� itI I_, �I.' �• V I�CZR1 ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAjjo.NL G.� TE: � 7 PL�:�I\G DIVOON EXHIBIT --- SCALE= f-F 11 ---- f.-'Zz 7 Ll 79 L 11 ifill I CITY of RAINCHO CUCANNIONUA PLANNING DIVISION ITENI:. TITLE: EXHIBIT= SCALE- NORTH .0 I � ` r I '•�� I r- n � .� J i • a ^` H•�r lj / /�J�� L CITY OF ITEX t: . PLtV'TNI. \G DiNrE N Fie rTr. SCALE: J -1c) FORTH 11 - Crr' t SCALE: J -1c) FORTH 11 - E F y 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.NLIO\GA PLANNING DIVISION ITE%I r I d EXHII3rI = Iff t SCALE- ••�- Sr. CITY OF RANCHO CUOMMO\GA TIT'S: i �55 AL PLC VN NG DlN'iStC?\ E.\liiBr : = Z SCALE: ••'� LJ CITY OF zLMiCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the propcsed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tract No. 12772 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Morris & Searles, 2950 Aiwiay Avenue, Suite B -1, Costa Mesa, CA 9zbZb 714/957- NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Ed Greer of Cal -Land, P. 0. Box 1376, Claremont, CA 91711 714/946- LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Undetermined at present. I -1 —%3 PROJECT DESCFIPTION Q un A develo went of 81 lots with public Y sing e story U= Lac ffen ome;, t.4o r'ii— an —ge r0111 lulb square por, r:, 0 ACREAGE PROPOSED OF PROJECT BUILDINGS, AREA AND, IF SQUARE FOOTAGE O. X contain a total of 140,322 ANY- so. f,,. 15.2 acres. Proposed uildingsAto DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT INCLUDING INFUP ATION ON TOPOGRApgy' pI,F,TJgS CT ITE "ALS. ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) Is the project of cum - ulative May as a whol e No Parr of a larger project, one of a series actions, which althnuch individually small, have significant environmental i-mpact? I -z s 2 E i WILL T?iIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X, 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan. designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? How many? ± 200 X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: The site pr.2sently rontainc a strove of citrus trees and some EUCd.yp us gees whiEn i IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date lv -ZV —P1 Signature Title Consultant I -3 J -1s RESIDENTIAL The following nforsnation should be Planning Division in order to aid in district'to accommodate the proposed CONSTRUCTION` Drovided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga assessing the ability of the school residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Morris & Searles, Tertative NO Specific Location of Project: East side of Ramona, west side of Turr:r, south of Baseline. PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 20 2. Number of multiple family units: None 3. Date proposed to begin construction: Fail '84 4. Earliest date of occupancy• Model 4 and # of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range 01, 2 BR 5851000 #2, 3 BR 56,000 #s, 3 BR 100,000 #4, 4 BR 105,000 15 16 None None 29 81 None None Winter '85 Spring '85 Summer '85 Fall '84 Winter '85 Sprina '85 Summer '85 I -4 s- Awlk qw 11 r L° Ll RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF i'HE CI.r OF RANCHO CUCAMON&", CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY AFPRGVING TENTATIVE TRACT VIAP NO. 12772 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12772, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Morris & Searles, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision on 15.2 acres of land located between Ramona and Turner, approximately 1,000 feet south of Base Line into 81 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearine and action on September 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Plafmin9 Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12772 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is nct likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large. now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. -� - !-7 (9) That this project will the environment and issued. not create adverse impacts on a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12772, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1• Front yard landscaping is required anC shall include, at a minimum, one 15- gallon size tree, one 5- gallon size tree, seeded ground cover and a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. This requirement shall be in addition to required street trees. 2. The combination retaining wall and screen wall along the south project boundary shall not exceed an overall combined height of nine (9) feet, as measured from the existing grade on the south side of the wall. 3. Provide 15 -foot minimu,r flat usable rear yard area per City grading standards. 4. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy systern. The easements may be contained in a declaration of restrictions for the subdivision, which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation., structures, fixtures, or any other object except for utility wires and similar objects pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060 -G- 2. 5. Tract shall provide at least two different colors of roofing material and /or two different types of roofino material for variety. The variation in roof materials /colors shall be plotted on a site plan and samples provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 6. Corner lots with side entry garages shall be reverse plotted with the garage and driveway located to the rear, and as far as possible from the intersection. 7. Slope banks in excess of five (5) feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and soften their appearance as follows: one 15- gallor or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, one 1- gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate J E LI Page 3 ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of eignt is (8) feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5- gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the develc9er prior to occupancy. ENGI'AEERING DIVISION: 8. Remove and replace Ramona Avemie to eliminate tilt section. A reimbursement agreement or fee credit shall be grantea to the applicant for construction work beyond centerline. 9. The existing pavement on Turner Avenue shall be removed and replaced (full width) with a minimum of six (5) inches of asphaltic concrete or native soil for the length of the project boundary. A reimbursement agreement or fee credit shall be granted to the applicant for construction work beyond centerline. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPIcMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: — Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST Rick Gomez, Deputy e-6retary 1, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissioli of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the foiiowinc vote -to -wit: AYES: COMb1T!7,SIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 ci .r) ci O L 0 E o �. v a.�•r zN -u T u c u- �; •� m .. L' -. n .e n Vn aMe-•r N E B ti ° Oar u�CfjG d d C S L r U L n C O l� r Vi• L a_ b .. 4 r r .�q G i � � r C > V`� jn�•OM NL V.. iG QTV_GV =�= aC.:��j Vr.. .n L r° — am IL�pLE - � rC•+ �EpNV r 7LCr U9rr V�9.'_^ y —'q Sy_ l.Ur O I Oc� p r G r� V�✓ d rF Y ^J °r.G. — G N G '..! n C .Vi. — c y c� � p� 7O� S NOn9 ?2 r rM ^ r =._ �VbrrD J• r rc'OEV __ Vr0 L V` N d ° 1 r V ° j `c�_ifp .`•V 6 >• �_� LAG' °T4> _L C (�`� °•nzs�ru G'' _ Day — �� .'• Eu —uy.� °. = °a t=z �� ^ I Y � F v O r O rSL ••• ^--' N Srr ° < icc � O c 4 J o� •'a C p V O � r [' � •y V V N V V y V O L 9 O � OG �L..♦VO rre S..O �P9 C �L C'EP VV.i6 OH�04 �Q — LOa y > GV?�0.°. J` M °r N p 2 IGG� ✓L `.r..N °� C � N T N 2 L r =� r9 ��d_�Nr �'P 9GV n0. Pr n —J..' �T � d• >rd GG— Cf•'O� — ^`bLVO �d49 .U_ __ 1p`d�•p a6 V�•r 9. •VCj VN _ M_LO _ .Li. `�> O P >. w O r J E ` r O 6 E O >♦P E q OC•r n•r U -�° C „rru•) 'LJ T .J ♦y OCrV f4d4 <" VC .� LOn VO CCp N O �° e O V b =L 9N G= O d y L 6 V d V - � P •y C r r_ .. d c> L� �_ V G w D 9� 4 4 V •w G� .... O -- e N G V O O> -r V` _ . C n.rr e N r� � j L G L— 4 i V 'O r C, —'J 4 W J O V° •r+ t[ 'rr > � V I OI N � r0 b x i N c 0 o 25 0 C O � 1 N L Q G C V m 6 y ` •� �[ O C° .G2 I � � .Gy G • �� N° N E B ti ° Oar u�CfjG ♦OC �r r ti Or N D •°i• 6 u N— O 9 ..5o o 7O� J• `dN V V � > LG OP�Gi n.r >r L r 4I .`•V 6 >• �_� LAG' °T4> G • C (�`� � 79 90w_ G Va V ^ I o Y � F v O r O rSL ••• ^--' N Srr ° < icc � O c i :� J o� •'a C p V O � r [' � •y V V N V V y V O L 9 O OG C i r T p L� L J V O r O O r F 09 V r O � y > •Oi• > • M N� N p 2 O 6 q °� C � N T N 2 L r v -a o k 11 s N E VSO ° P� a.L >. -- -✓ - c^ w t f E N O 9 y✓ ✓- 4 N 9 r> .e ✓ c .T r w L P I€'- `Gn Z 6ri� i 4G LMNr CM9 - VAN Der LS 'LY ram G<^ LNG 7�CN s ca °yq °U =c ✓v a N� N31 ✓:�.�v V. Q i c n.' �4 d.°.. =° « _� c n Sc�C. D. ^�9 V✓T✓ LGLL ��-> ✓ ['xn 0 1= NK L dC �,°.. LCD G NQ u v .'.vv or v .` Yr o 4 LE -.°.. ✓u _L « c -N Yy a o> _ N = _r >c>E °F > °J -�7 V N✓ i L O G _z- V � � G� .�.. L. T G V __ S _ V y n C aJ .,�•J c c u Y .�. N E •^_ c .e a_ P a _ _ nc _ n. o �^_•c r'.. -�::� _ =c c Nye =.. _- w z ....� ..o ir+ `J ✓7a J:_g Vr _ -•c °� ?G6 -�.N+a nEVY C .Q V[.✓ e.°..w Yr .9�0� m ^L ✓ .ri Lr` Ny d - Q' �`7rE == i- =c= D�� dd.� Lama ^c ✓c � or y,o .-NY d ✓e .✓..rV t9 VC✓ W C VOr�V gGn�E- v�r 9�uC r. t•J r -NN �v4 NVzc °� .J" ° G =t G✓ t N E -c' .� c C 9�` o r es .. O mo d q�° V M r V s E c V Q ✓ G' M - x ✓ r V 0 r` - V C P' � - v. __ C C C 9 r N CJ � ✓cvV - N O O C J 9�✓ �r VOQV O °JCS -�O G•' O P�G✓ v ✓d- Nor L�r✓ = ritq� �V °OL_V M >> >5T0 ✓_ Nd usWi a. <�6 o_a n� q M l �- w- i✓ q N C C y C O< V V D . j� G �� G q O G i V r D`✓ �'- N C% j M Y N ✓ P l d d l C _O VON _e pVPV neyc -L ✓N U :J Ce ` v c o iV ✓GO ..y- 4r �°d UTO'✓ Pd 71 on�L °C °q G nor ✓ - Ol�P i.d. °ems VGO r.`.i 'whir e'O° ry �J'c O yocy. $ C Ve C -• r_OT c O rPa _tF9 ^ LI N >� ea L; GFO o.a. c o-�r cr < ..< .T<.r .✓ G O b O e O r V L. r ° q S'rG VY C �� N� ( C. l M ✓6✓ 6G O t i� f d �OCOO �4 G u✓ O'er Zz - - > =T ✓ EON -C.L 092 Z. C ✓r R. N < L! C✓ >>� C 6 GV.d.� r c -`j T L E ✓ i Y �[ S V L O' C � C o N U_ O V =os ilY c �qE �r< do rc O c� �u cNFV - NVC c -J V V a y V_ L✓ L- - G� w J�' N C O c D N ✓ G 'e O ✓ c V -. a r r �- 9 -- i ° G y N V C � v ti J V O G- V ✓O �D` s0� r �CCOaG q CcC�J 0.4 O4r �O NCO OC ry0 -y =- ✓r00 N9CN ti M= w� NL q VC °V ua =V C� N J<D G xY�- 7x Gwc rV✓ L<i` �c V P - _c ✓u J. _eo `^c G.✓ __a °� o�..�c� v cs if Le.-c ✓..i r G C f y V w4 r V O c C' r- C• L S G_ _T L C n L C _C v __ L N r 6r Y` x i E✓ L c c C a -O< c a _ c O�• - rG'�'C_rG c iC`= = �OCr Gw N ue�= -�y -c_-a s_ �C G�'c�.✓n� yr aoo Gq= -Ee c ^i w�.a. e+. a`. ` N M O «� E � 4. N 4 e < V ✓ .-w L G 4 G.�i P� G r > C N L G q .✓. O r ^r• C 9 C .�... +[ k 11 s N E i c..�✓ � °r °c n N � :u c- "9 N c•q Y �9 c c � p° o a °c cJ- - °u c',o oc_ z L u_c_J'�•.NV ELLS` ° qa ✓n o V • °_ Y $••OOd a I -u }�_ O G^ P_ O - ✓ � T✓ r p V - O � y q D� O' .-`. c' - N O L V n_a •• aroma- � - i. N �aa cr L. I Z > c -c c =_ -° d✓ c -_ TALC• a•� y9u -r q S C C I __ L O FG N C _ O _ T.'- N '• S r r C D N •.T D ✓ a q O l G C C ° C ` •r• C ✓ T � q_ .� v' C' q_- c y ` O S L = � G � V 9 .� i •a q C ^G'r y •^J 4 ✓Lr.,^ LT ✓r c= 9MD= :iec+ _�- r�aGr g�Ga � V= rifC� °V ✓- `L�w ✓•J =�6�� Et ... ° •D-' m ✓ `L. -u0•GV `_ d o A 9 o v d j i vM+ N = c v_ ° - -N ° n •' o G _ >• _ '9 �N nu ✓� •r•dl` •-�� ` �r NOV` a 7 r.Y ✓� V V •'• N •r• e ' �✓ r a L rOn �. � E i N ` OGpa> c N N a O V O ur N GPI �JQ a:•N0✓ Gy y �y_r l C °P It T c' }. bO - ✓r0 O yC l q O NJq � �••La AO 6 J`> -J E' Vj9 N qT Di „N C qv 4G N 9Ly l G C C <C V� G T- O - 9 E�` •w T V ° 9 C C c_ ' OOr- -• 6✓_YOr q � •n r-w -� 2 9� _o �OrO �� TPrC� YV VG ` d grrGd CEO' -✓ LLL�� ^L}p^ `• - ✓rA V VSN�u V �O• _w ✓_ ✓r d NO-VZ - •., r V �_ 9_ q � ` V^ C O 9 r L a C -O• ✓ Cr.-. SVfUd <A�06 6V L _ '•Na � Gq� :r O9pM V� •n N q S-J� JLEC � \ a c drn be L cGCa - -c �d•-b9 mr`rL c✓ 9c D v n - oc e o•Z <aq aoAp �`o oc �_ r Y r p rn n L . c -E =c q -_ c• _ �•`.• °,r L ° ="< s^ rAn -r'rn <a qai qz Op es Lr P � ..c NL_p q C .. p��09N r76 � 6 P N bL..OQ� = O'P� Nln �.0.. ✓ N O- V OVrr •On °� u• � r O. � O N T ✓° E✓ '.V.� d O G� V d n. C� = L r r O •O.. N C y � 2 �} G✓ E J y G V C S r q MI y L ql EY tr 99 yOJ] NFL 6�LGror ^.N O•-ir G d A Q y q N rLe F- C11 G 2 � P ` • G L.r i L rLO ✓9q V C. O i N � } Jr6 _ _r O C ✓ 4v 9 r q- ° _ � G L •r• • � 9 N l C q G C = -J C d_ ✓ p d l �I �o r Ya Lr. e. °9 -� oon � _z'v,i -? o..� �_^• _z r =t NCE✓ �i V 9 ✓e0 NGIG pq C OI Lam• G� QN'•V YVU• N° ri dq ON L•-C dV Y.l• O✓ N qt Yr0° GL . OV= < x 6 O� L N V_ ✓ = M_ C^ v O L M i G p °� _� G✓ C L tV6O V ZI r= N G yC a r` NqL� O✓ a j0 o . c N o ` T c.✓ L =% 9 G= N d G° c c° - •^ o r° st r ✓00 ^pC i Ji fr V •J✓ � yVL,• -CT qV L�� aG d✓ QV q O 6 9• r 9 rOir � � O V � V q C q q S° �� U y `r ✓ ��•_..rq 9 C'� V�� •r• r Lf..00•rV ✓VO j0. - O� 9v t u'Vg VGCO CG `D G i UO 1 1. O' t r E� O L p �I O b r � C✓ Y � - C C M' l�. � G J y =C� N✓ V�l`c -• G y�y nI O 7_ gip_ NN Y _ N .ro �T L = uc_ mac- ter` _ i° ° c+a� V G✓ -VL N J M ✓ b } . G ”' } =p `- ✓i r �_ LI .-._q `q .. n• Jru .- - ou N Ec .L. `o . GON O.N <V G"J O q Gw6q - C uV OGS N 6N-Z SNO . -NL �I G4 v � N I•f < N r �• tV � cn V v i O y O O E L 7 � O i O ` L. O a L O r 6 9 C ° �°o u a O C 9 — L '^ c — V q r N O P� L O C � C N •' Y _ r < 6 O O V Ni f'1� 9 q C v° O • c7 00 - N G V N` f� O V C q O T u Y i O 6 r d rW u - q 4 i� O = a q0 ua d l qco V u c a c EYe C O p V V E Y °yC G y 9 � r V •�+ ;• 2 C v G� Yo- qN— Tp.L.. W o 0i a DES �I n N s OI 1 u O_qC O r 9 O r.— y�.0 d G y q y � a a —� E — a°i r c • "Ov ° WuN y U t O P `c "• L v O ° Y M c " y o Y V V O 9 6 6 V C 9 r N rei o° a N � E o y O V C V — 7 sc N T e b CY q ° O W ° � e .j.= > a W L 4 � c O� OTL c Pc y 4 6 v O T EV � n9 r co y q V O Gqr cq O � O L O SSTT r c t C V — C — _ V ` 2 r ]n � a _ u f 1: O � 6Ty On1'< >O V n q V• •1 �+ v m O C -_ J •- •O 9 L.V..O� r _ p Il N y CV i 9 N 9 N O i t q p ` 1 V V l r •. q O V J I•Er � dOr �O �Dy r '. � aVt C• - -i 1 Y � .e C O M �• d IG Mq— 0Q6 — V o'— —FUa °uY V D o`- -• o Y 1 G_Vr<7 (�� .°� Lr� �• a W e � —_ = N` d O L o e =_F Vim= .-. A C Y u _ O[ N O �O> C r •n r .� ra' - _•' i.� OrI � C _emu P _._ V � � J 5..�.Jn N •.r u M C O .f � N .a D CJ SVO Cr L Y` C •J � .`O LcVN � -r VO «« 'r• L D C • T. O V j N V V •j6 CiCa ^ " UC 6 iy SNP `N 2 ; L a l pi °tea ° La °r O1 o c ^ —•• rc� ., aL — �o Y — O q •• T C O° • E O V 2 N V C V q v 9 _� O cI ��i.. '^EZyEM r7G =p• i EV �— sV c� =�0 cu do °o_° Ni q= J= iN � `N" j 0 � `� Pte_ a•°• ° � =4 e a`e— .2. 7 w« corer —.n OI • LJDDyyuj 6— •,I p N SVa W••°•O WVV >° t»Sx <� GI T � GI GI •n 1. r• N PI ql i o� V v i O y O O E L 7 � O i O ` L. O a L O r 6 9 C ° �°o u a O C 9 — L '^ c — V q r N O P� L O C � C N •' Y _ r < 6 O O V Ni f'1� 9 q C v° O • c7 00 - N G V N` f� O V C q O T u Y i O 6 r d rW u - q 4 i� O = a q0 ua d l qco V u c a c EYe C O p V V E Y °yC G y 9 � r V •�+ ;• 2 C v G� Yo- qN— Tp.L.. W o 0i a DES �I n N s OI 1 u O_qC O r 9 O r.— y�.0 d G y q y � a a —� E — a°i r c • "Ov ° WuN y U t O P `c "• L v O ° Y M c " y o Y V V O 9 6 6 V C 9 r N rei o° a N � E o y O V C V — 7 sc N T e b CY q ° O W ° � e .j.= > a W L 4 � c O� OTL c Pc y 4 6 v O T EV � n9 r co y q V O Gqr cq O � O L O SSTT r c t C V — C — _ V ` 2 r ]n � a _ u f 1: O � 6Ty On1'< >O V n q V• O ` •, cl _i E •1 �+ v m O C -_ J •- •O 9 L.V..O� r _ p Il N y CV i 9 N 9 N O i t q p ` 1 V V l r •. q O V J I•Er � dOr �O �Dy r '. � aVt C• - -i 1 Y � .e C O M �• d IG Mq— 0Q6 — V W V D v Y 1 G_Vr<7 _ Nc cqc I Lr� O` ` •J N` d O L C' _ O[ N O �O> C r •n O ` •, cl _i E I In q_ q O rr r C I = m Awl EMIL < N n I � j I � Y I _ - Q W V 2 � N N c �' _ ✓ t L V ,;A L L OL ` I V U�d LL Cn•n ^r � ✓Lr° Q" I m c �`o D _ E ri O O O O IL C � �"Op V_ G =V `✓ Np � O w O G -42 ^ T IE v` _ L = •mL I L -7 V N N V cam N q N O q >. C � .d. O y. �n � � V V L C i L D C O �`✓ � �� .� �. O � C p " t f q _r 9^ t. E= M r N ✓ V� q d .n L O d q N f � �_ K q 4 C N C( `'� ✓ t p � I w � O •O• � t0J E 6 q Q -°• n L n C V O 6 c G C� Y 2 OI tC.J �! T N 6 C L I I Oq C` q Or ^� LOO ` rVq COC L PO VqN Ort r7nE C ✓ U C V T r d C�� C y V E r C✓ L N ° a ✓ Q L° � O C L 6 -J.T r� 0 V O U n Z r ti M _4 T .O Ol VP Z r 7V SENd ��CNQ �V.N` .0 iOV LO` dE V r PL06 d?PP .S�TIC � _PE p0 lV c _ q v E 0= e✓ v n q` ° c r oca N __ n g i C__ °!" T° L E`Y NY`ES 4 rG a4 4 P .gi�ir� C•q V� qp_k ✓Z_ qC VYNO n60� ___r uo � o oL L VC P do se .d.» N Lm_ L •w i -J = L_ L L C� P 6 U� V To 4ZM ��✓C � __ per..+ �D �r c Eq ` V• U O O_ y C_ V L qN O F p w O C O I C C .-ar � 4^ V ice. cY V.✓ L �. '^ V V rE O p v. Nc V r r�E .✓ CUL L Tr q o o� c_coo ...d N! ..on_._ ap C a r�CT 'OrL c r y Ct ?Y N'V•'C...V Y= di w 2 P DVr C C_ •.. '` r q V r .! Yom_ ° O'w ' O ✓ °u O = E LI M� q qq E ✓L -c C. Yr C'.. CO�Nr�L q OW 0. V QPV �✓ 6 S a V Z V iI qi pp' mI OI T .. u� � J I In I� O U C.i O i G 1 c C 22 2 q �J E ✓ i p .L r V � q V N N G r C 9 N q V N V � O d✓ V L q�• G •r �' ^J O L L r O ✓ .T U- `rr O✓ V O P V L F C x LL 9 °o � d p ✓rr u yc� O d F n E C O C L q N Y O pt_ V✓ Od 'N C" O C i ✓ O � C O • •` Q •VnC� VC 6q 22 �� Q O•w C S O Nd N.�o u W c ✓ 0 « o L 000 0 err r C. V y' r s G I ✓ C P V G S. e�� C Q >' V A C O ✓« O C r r 1 N p L d ✓ C t P 0 r I� � L W C = 9 V u T c U N ^ Q O C P C N N v L 4 O ✓ C `J y F _��`n N d I r triJ qV ' O C L•�i•l S C —O N d = N s "u A L L L L ✓ N n C I G c ^L 4 n N Ft r0.•CN _ C V C q _ ✓_ > N C �• C •i'y V �^ ✓L q O p� ° C y J u_ _ v X v u r ✓ C ° l � C l' c-o V t O V C✓ c � L O �•O^ � nd �G-m� C �' C � v.� ✓ C N L P C ✓n �' �` ' N � _ ✓ Vc P S C N O• qr C� l q T P y= i O c c c c i I _ c �` c = o c L �Vr rp r a a „v a C n Vy PF �' TO✓ C i Nq C L� C9•r N Y Y� Pr2EV0 > O OC V C O _ 4 L a E E n' E✓ = C L Py r o N O C= x M ✓^ 4 P. E O p 4 O 6 C« L Y 6 a 2 U C e n p � _ p y C� ✓ �D �V i 7a �I t •Lip C _ _Tq?OVL V L =� O C ✓ G ✓ Or✓ G_ P O ✓ d P d r n a VI M. y 9 nV. V N E C r 7 N T r C O`er 3 •rr Y � d G VV ✓ a•n O � U n W d q 6« QV 4� W r N L rV d 36 VO �j ql j 1 c C 22 2 q �J E ✓ i p .L r V � q V N N G r C 9 N q V N V � O d✓ V L q�• G •r �' ^J O L L r O ✓ .T U- `rr O✓ V O P V L F C x LL 9 °o � d p ✓rr u yc� O d F n E C O C L q N Y O pt_ V✓ Od 'N C" O C i ✓ O � C O • •` Q •VnC� VC 6q 22 �� Q O•w C S O Nd N.�o u W c ✓ 0 « o L 000 0 r C. V y' ✓ s G ✓ C P V G S. C Q >' V A C O W W r r 1 d ✓ C t P 0 r I� � L W C = 9 V u T c U N OCL Q O C P N N v L 4 O y F _��`n d I r triJ qV ' O C L•�i•l S C —O N d = N a "u A L L L L i c I G c ✓ V c o� _ ✓_ c N Z !x ✓ ✓L q O ° C y J u_ _ v X v u 2 ++ 1 � ^ c✓ c-o N 0 c � q= p r i E C �' C � V ✓ C N = P C �' �` ' 1 c C 22 2 q �J E ✓ i p .L r V � q V N N G r C 9 N q V N V � O d✓ V L q�• G •r �' ^J O L L r O ✓ .T U- `rr O✓ V O P V L F C x LL 9 °o � d p ✓rr u yc� O d F n E C O C L q N Y O pt_ V✓ Od 'N C" O C i ✓ O � C O • •` Q •VnC� VC 6q 22 �� Q O•w C S O Nd N.�o u c ✓ 0 « o L 000 oL r C. V y' ✓ L ✓ C P V >' V A C O a W r 1 d ✓ C t P 0 r I� � L W C = 9 T c U N OCL � C P N N v L 4 O y F _��`n d I r triJ qV ' O C L•�i•l S C —O N d = N a "u A L L L L i c ✓ V c _ ✓_ N I p ✓ C ✓ ✓L q O ° _ t L ^ c✓ c-o N \• V � E c � q= p r i E �' C � V ✓ C � p = P C �' �` ' N � _ c O• qr I P c P c c c c i I _ c �` c = o c L ✓ ` O C C _ 4 = C L x M ✓^ 4 P. E 4 n �_ C 1 c C 22 2 q �J E ✓ i p .L r V � q V N N G r C 9 N q V N V � O d✓ V L q�• G •r �' ^J O L L r O ✓ .T U- `rr O✓ V O P V L F C x LL 9 °o � d p ✓rr u yc� O d F n E C O C L q N Y O pt_ V✓ Od 'N C" O C i ✓ O � C O • •` Q •VnC� VC 6q 22 �� Q O•w C S O Nd N.�o u ✓ 0 000 oL r C. V y' ✓ L ✓ C P V >' V A C v W L d ✓ C t P W C T- ^✓ ° T c U N OCL ...•L✓T_P C P N N v L 4 T d✓ y F _��`n triJ qV ' O C L•�i•l S C —O N d = N ✓ "u A L L L L Ln40.+ V _ ✓_ L ✓ C ✓ ✓L q ^ c✓ c-o c � q= p �' C � V ✓ C C� °= = P C �' �` ' N _ _ C zo _ c O• qr 1 E� P c C•S _ �` c L x M ✓^ 4 P. E 4 n �_ C a r. U C e n ✓ � C p y C� j� t •Lip C _ V L =� r P = d r I C P `I I E m C X O a.� U G n 0 L d 11 �I el ` Luc �= o a G ` V r C G L v 1 ✓ L O v f � � � r Or r uV q I P a C Zy = V� L L n � N > uN F ✓- °✓ ° =N qv 9 v q � � c' Y— a i 49-v' r V �q L,— d I r o q I �I el O i 9 L N o .ae ° a N N r � V t 0 f O 4 Y r � � M p G ° e ° w 6 r E v n V O _ nr p j V V Y j O \1 V r p 6 p V� �I ` N u 0 r� 0 ` V r C G v T ✓ L O D r W L V..yl Or r uV D` P Y Zy = V� n F N q °✓ ° d P 9 C q � � a t' r V L,— E E�' N t � P N 7 ^ ,• O qD�° N aC b aG �a JV�• � � NO n N L� GAD V V q NI N ^I 0 O i 9 L N o .ae ° a N N r � V t 0 f O 4 Y r � � M p G ° e ° w 6 r E v n V O _ nr p j V V Y j O \1 V r p 6 p V� �I ` N u 0 r� 0 0 E CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1984 10: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVI -- pia E *3' - The develeplment of a 24,475 square toot cnurcn tac717ty and operation of a preschool on 4.29 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dulac), ioc:ated on the south sidL of Arrow Highway between Calaveras Avenue and Sierra Madre Avenue - APN 207 - 342 -12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. A•tion Requested: Develop the First Spanish Assembly of God •Cnurch and preschool /day care facilities B. Purpose: Prov4de church and preschool /day care facilities to the surrounding community. C. Location: South side of Arrow Highway between Calaveras Avenue and Sierra Madre Avenue D. Parcel Size: 4.29 acres (approxim.:tely 186,872 square feet) E. Existing Zoning: Low Residential District F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use and Zunin ort7 - Singe Fairily esi a iai, Low Resid •ntial District South - Single Family Residential, Low Residential District East - Single Family Residential, Low Residential District West - Single Famil- Residential, Low Residential District H. General Plan 1 roje ct Site North - Low South - Low East - Low West - Low )esignatioa• Low Resider Residential, Residential, Residential, Residential, ti,l, 2 -4 du /ac 2 -4 du /ac 2 -4 du /ac 2 -4 du /ac 2 -4 du /ac ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 83 -2C /Nakano September 12, 1984 Page 2 STAFF REPORT I. Site Characteristics: T„e subject property is basically a rectangular shaped lot which fronts on Arrow Highway and backs up to Vinmar Avenue right-of-way (a stub street) and single family residential properties. J. M-plicable Regulations: A Conditional Use Permit is required for construction of churches and preschool /day care facilities within the Low Residential District. II. ANALYSIS: A. Geri -ral: The proposed project, approximately 3 =,000 square We :c designed to be ccastructed in two (2) phases. Phas3 I (24,475 sq. ft.) includes: (1', fellowship /multi- pjrpose hall; (2) administrative offices; and, (3) two classror-i buildings. Phase II would consist of a 10,000 square foot sanctuary with a seating capacity of 900. Each ciassroom building would contain 10 classrooms, totaling 20 classrooms. Six classrooms, in the south building would be used for day care at a maximum of 12 children per room, or 72 children total. The remaining classrooms would be used for preschool students at a maximum of 16 children per classroom or 224 children. The maximum to :al children classroom capacity for both buildings would be 296 children. B. Circulation: The increased t•affic volume generated due to the proposed project would not be significant. The capacity of Arrow Highway is capable of handling this increased volume. C. resign Review Committee: Tne specific design review issues revolved around integrating the proposed use and architecture with the surrounding single family residential uses. These specific issues included: (1j the placement of structures on the site; (2) architectural integration of the proposed structures with the surrounding single family residences; and, (3) providing adequate buffers between the proposed structures and the surrounding residential area. These issues have been resolved by the applicant to the Committee's satisfaction and recommended conditions have been inco- porated into the attached Resolution. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee recommended full street improvements along Arrow Highway to include curb, gutter, pavement, sidewalk, drive approach, street lights, etc., and a cul -de -sac at the end of Vinmar Street. The Committee also recommended one driveway approach on Arrow Highway. In addition, the Committee recommended a 10 -foot wide dense landscape buffer adjacent to�the surrounding CJ E7 E 11 PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 83: -20 /Nakano September 12, 1984 Pcge 3 STAFF REPORT singl;: family residence:; along the perimeter property lines. These recommendations should be completed prior to issuance of occupancy of the first pnase. The conceptual grading plan has peen approved. E. Environmental Review- Past I of the Initial Study has been completed by the ap;ilicant and is attached `or your review. Staff `as completed Pcrt II of the environmental assessment and found no significant adr � erse en•oiron�ntal impacts related to the construction of the project or the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed in the attached Resolution are supported by the following facts: 1. The project provides setbacks, buffers, architectural elements, and improvements to make it compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 2. The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the d =veiopment and the proposed uses are in acco -dance with the objectives of the General Plan and Development C.de. 3. The proposed building design and _ite plan, in conjunction with the conditions of approval, are consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a H.4olic hearing in The Daily Re crt newspaper and notices were sent to property ownerwithin__ GO feet of the subject property. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 83 -20 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City P canner RG:DP:jr Attachments: Exhibit ' - Location Map Exhibit "S" - Site Pian Exhibit "C" - Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions ARROW 14 2 'cl 10 .° 9 42) a � 1 --'71 a i f 1 Fi `y� 19 el_20 777 2J 23 H 2 j 24 G G 30, 25 H �$ 0. 26 Ld t- 2T 'C t! W.112 LOT 2O 20 V u E J w 17 I °0 2 w� - •�� w'. .41 ro) I - o. T [, �:L LS .Vll�9 �'�.•� ®i 12♦ C % 0 so so c� NORrci CITY OF IMI: CUP 33 -Zo R '\'CHO CL'CA1I0 \GA 0 '-ITLE: _',QUcrlQtA - 6L4- - PLANNING DR'ISION EXHIBIT. " 17_ SCALE= to To . i/ 7 m E _ ARROW ROB _f !y r a I,�sw11 _ IJ� x a: r— NORTH CITY OF IT -L:�I: CUP '6-3-2.0 _ — ® RANCHO CLCAMONGA -nTLE- SI'T'E pLor.`t ,- PLrsuNNI \G Dit'LSiO\ EXHi13IT: � SCALE= h1cz Th Ge S 3 _f r a I —y � rNN. STi LOCATON PLAN I 1 ./a .:... illLI H HI 1 i lI I I ll U Z � I aas.NH � l' l �W lip,PLdF� SITE PLAN NORTH CITY OF IT -L:�I: CUP '6-3-2.0 _ — ® RANCHO CLCAMONGA -nTLE- SI'T'E pLor.`t ,- PLrsuNNI \G Dit'LSiO\ EXHi13IT: � SCALE= h1cz Th Ge S 3 i O W W 2 f Q O e i L � I CITY or- RAINC1 IC V VTCATMo\ VA PLANNING Dl'% S)N i_ �i 2 F i- is v z 0 1>il 3J3! S O 11 W —a a c 'Y NORTH V ! rrA►: r U l TITLE 1EELEt/4i tci&I_ EXHIBIT: u u $GALE :.h v cCPI E 0 is F � W Y � W z 0 1>il 3J3! S O 11 W —a a c 'Y NORTH V ! rrA►: r U l TITLE 1EELEt/4i tci&I_ EXHIBIT: u u $GALE :.h v cCPI E 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDI"iIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -20 FOR A CHURCH AND PRESCHOOL FACILITY LOCATED Oti THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW HIGHWAY BETaEEN CALAVERAS AVENUE AND SIERRA MADRE AVENUE IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 21st day of October, 1983, a complete application was Nakano Associates, Inc. for review of the above - described project; WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described the fol;owinr findings That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives n; the Development Code, and the purposes of the district ir which the site is located. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental :o the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious `o properties or improvements in the Vicinity. That the proposed use complies with each c applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this pro,e(t will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on teptember 12, 1984. SECTION 3: That Conditional to the following conditions: PLANNING DICISION A ten (10) foot dense landscap: buff -ir shall be provided adjacent to single family residences to the west, east and south along the perimeter property lines prior to occupancy of the first phase. Detail-, and phasrs shall be indicated on detailed lanascape plans. Resolution No. Page 2 2. The fire access area adjacent to Vinmar Avenue shall be turf - blocked to provide greenerv. 3. All laws and regulations of the State Department of Social Services relating to licensing of children's (educational) day care facilities shall be complied with prior to opening of tha school. 4. if the operation of this school causes adverse effects upon adjacent properties, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of such uses. 5. Operation of the school shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall's Regulations have been complied with. Plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. 6. Expansion of the preschool will require the approval of a modified Conditional Use Permit. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Rzsolut'on was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Fanning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 11 Related Files: Tract 12414 and Tentative Tract 12727 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval . of a subdivision, site Flan and building elevations B. Puroose: Development of 33 single family residential homes C. Location: West of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street D. Parcel Size: 4.28 acres E. Existing Zoning: Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) F. Existing Land lase: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: North - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Vacant, egg ranch, Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) East - Single family development under construction, Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) West - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) H. General Plan roject Site Worth - Low South - Low East - Loh West - Low )esignations: - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) Residential (2 -4 du /ac) Medium Residential (4 -8 da /ac) Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) Residential (2 -4 du /ac) ITEM L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT `�:C.,.%Jo L DATE: September 12, 1984 U — F -17 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12725 - A -M COMPANY - A residential subdivision of 3 lcts on approximately 4.28 acres of land in the Low Medium Development District (4 -8 du /ac) located west of Beryl Avenue and soutn of Hamilton Street - APN 202 - 032 -22 and 2`a. Related Files: Tract 12414 and Tentative Tract 12727 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval . of a subdivision, site Flan and building elevations B. Puroose: Development of 33 single family residential homes C. Location: West of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street D. Parcel Size: 4.28 acres E. Existing Zoning: Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) F. Existing Land lase: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: North - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) South - Vacant, egg ranch, Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) East - Single family development under construction, Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) West - Single family residences, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) H. General Plan roject Site Worth - Low South - Low East - Loh West - Low )esignations: - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) Residential (2 -4 du /ac) Medium Residential (4 -8 da /ac) Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) Residential (2 -4 du /ac) ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12726 - A -M Company September 12, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The existing 4 -ar_re site is predominantly vacant, with the exception of an existing home and ancillary shed buildings which are proposed to be removed with this development. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This project is an extension of the approved Tract 24 4 that is currently under construction to the east of this proposed tentative tract map. The proposed units are identical to those currently under construction. The subject map is also related to Tentative Tract 12727, also being reviewed at this evening's meeting. The circulation system of this tract will tie into the proposed streets of Mignonette and Avalon of Tract 12414. The proposed tract map identifies 33 residential lots on approximately 4.28 acres which equates to a density of 7.7 dwelling units to the acre. This is consistent with the proposed tract map to the east which is approximately at 7.6 dwelling units to the acre. Although this tract is a separate proposal from the already approved Tract 12414, the two could be considered as one development due to the integration of open space and the private street system. The applicant has opted to provide larger open space areas in more centralized locations rather than smaller passive areas throughout the 18 acre site (TT 12726, TT12727, and Tract 12414). While this map itself does not have any common open space, there are recreational areas in proximity to the tract that provide some form of credit to the open space that is required. An analysis of the open space is as follows: Tract Number Tract- L24 4 Tent. Tract 12726 Tent. Tract 12727 Overall Development (Tr:_ct 12414, TT 12726, TT 12727) Open Space Acre �e Provided % of Tract T acres .225 acres 7 711- 4.28 acres 0 0 2.6 acres .30 acres 11.54% 18.46 acres 1.55 acres 8.4% It was pointed out by staff that the project was being reviewed during a transition of reviewing the Low - Medium residential development standards. Currently, the Code requires that a minimum of 5% of the net area be provided in common recreational amenities. There is a proposed change to increase this to 10% of the total net site area. At th(L prgsent time a M 11 1 El PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12726 - A -V Company September 12, 1534 Page 3 total of 8.40 common open space is being provided by the three tracts. This was felt by the Committees to be acceptable due to the usable size of the areas and the easily accessible locations. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee discussed with the applicant the possibility of improving Avalon Street from the proposed tract to the existing Avalon Street on the west project boundary. The Committee felt that this was a viable alternative to the proposed fire lane ingress and egress point in that it would provide two means of primary access to and from the 6evelopment; one on Beryl Avenue and one to Carnelian Avenue through this Avalon Street connection. In accordance with the Design Review Committee's recommendation to continue Avalon, the applicant has revised the original submittal and now shows Avalon Street connecting to both tract maps. The Committee also commented that the same elevations and floor plans for the tract under construction to the east, Tract 12414, should be used in both this tract as well as Tract 12727 to insure compatibility and a comprehensive development in terms of design.. C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee members reviewed a subject tentative tract map proposal and found no major problems. Since this review a revised map was prepared addressing the Design Review Committee's request of connnecting Avalon Street. Although the Technical Review Committee did not have the privilege of reviewing this revised map, the Foothill Fire District was contacted for their opinion on the street connection. They indicated that either a fire lane used for temporary or emergency access purposes, or the proposed private street system connecting to the public street system to the west, would be satisfactory in meeting the Fire Department's access needs. Due to the Technical Review Committee not formally commenting on the revised submittal, it will be necessary for the applicant to make minor modifications and receive Technical Review Committee approval prior to the map's recordation. This is necessary due to staff concern over the ability to meet the required setbacks for the cul -c_ -sac lots per the Development Code. D. Environmental Review: Part I of completed by the applicant and review and consideration. Staff environmental assessment and has on the environment as a result of the Initial Study has been has been attached for your has completed Part II of the found no significant impacts this project., PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12726 - A -M Company September 12, 1984 Page 4 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Pian and Deveiopmert Code. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Developraent Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report as a public hearing and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution approving Tentative Tract 12726 and issue a Negative Declaration for the proposed project. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gom2iy^ Ciiry�?Yanner f RG:LD:jr Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut "A" - Location Map "8" - Subdivision Map "C" - Site Plan "D" - Landscape Plan "E" - Grading Pian Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions 1 C L� J C El E jr- I I JAI � ;Qi kCMLL pk ST WIG \\ O-E TE ST. I I w r 5T 1 I I I i i I nv Ck • I I I C 40.47 VISTA ST I � L —' wmin�F ST i j u v r¢ sT 9 a LIU CITY OF RANCHO CUC•AMO \TGzk PLANNING DIVLSO?N LOA LU Tk>GT k0. 12 LM 6G0' RAD:US UNI UA LM I °� i I I LH — L. � 1 _ I I i L ITE.N I: Tf 12'77 -& TITLE: LOG. +�T/OAI /SAP _ it EXHIBIT= ii -- SCALE. � V \QRTH I � -3 zacT 6849 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12726 -- /' L SUBDIVISION MAP XL �- e _ I z3 I Lill ✓�' fi i a �' zr�c 29 / 73 n � i f ?:.CT 6930 L 27 20 —7 1 zz \ORTti CITY ITE\ t- RA\Cl-i® CUCA�'10 \'Gr, TITLE: Syb�iytsia� 7f� PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- •. �� -� SCALE- l� C J r1 ... `�7 TACT 5214E I - - 7 I�! __ n CrTy OF +� RAINCHO CUC vvloj 'GA PLANNING DIVISION TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12726 DETAILED SITE PLAN C =_ ♦�aryy �lC CYCM5,0 l ITF_\I: Tr J2,17& TITLE: 5c:�2, PQldryv GYI-HIBIT: e.CG SCALE: ^' r NORTH I , �- ,� 3 :n �.6 ,I -- r1 ... `�7 TACT 5214E I - - 7 I�! __ n CrTy OF +� RAINCHO CUC vvloj 'GA PLANNING DIVISION TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12726 DETAILED SITE PLAN C =_ ♦�aryy �lC CYCM5,0 l ITF_\I: Tr J2,17& TITLE: 5c:�2, PQldryv GYI-HIBIT: e.CG SCALE: ^' r NORTH - -- "`r rJ45 TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 12726 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE _AN Ei 1J•' x•u r -.o' � e � ..n o„atR1 i - ♦s1 —: _t- 7 • J i 4 / 2s >j / T%s.CT G950 L — PROPOSED PLANT UST ssr wr.asi.su1w�.�.w .r C� NORTH E CITY OF ITEM- f f Rte \CHO CUGl '10 -'\GA TIT U.: PLANNING DIVISIO \1 GPI iII3IT- "Q„ gG��: i, N i. Ll f„ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12726 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ✓ V NORTH CITY OF ITENI: RANCI -10 C CT -kN'IONGA TITLE: �rL1L�i/a r�si6f�c� PLANNUNG DIVISION EXHIBIT:SC LE: 10000' I lJ � 2) '3 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12726 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ✓ V NORTH CITY OF ITENI: RANCI -10 C CT -kN'IONGA TITLE: �rL1L�i/a r�si6f�c� PLANNUNG DIVISION EXHIBIT:SC LE: 10000' I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development review Co:ynittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negativa Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TiSLE: Tentative Tra t a.;"2 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: A -M Comoanv 9513 Rucinccc rant-a, n.-;..,, C +_ 11r .' NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: P, -M Connany 714 qRn 19az _9513 Rucin cc Centor nr Sao °r^ v -nrhn fur ?,mDA9a_ CA 81710 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) West of Rervl and South of A _ _ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 T s , r� 0 E PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 29 Unit Plannea Development ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA ARID SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 4.1 Acres - 1 exist. house aoprox. 1500 S.F. Approx. 40.000 S.F. pr000sed DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) The project site .falls to the southeast at approx. 3 °' grade The site is currently vacant except for 1 house To the north are single family homes _ To the west are single family hanes To the saith is vacant _ To the east is Tract 12414 Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? rio I -2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many ?Approx. 10 _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: Trees scattered throughout the site IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and info=iation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date June 22, 1484 Signature Title Proiect Engineer 1 -3/.2 Y: 11 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The followi:ig information should he provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate -the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tez,,tative Tract No.: A -M Company TR 12727 Specific Location of Project: West of Bervl & Soath of Mianonette PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 1. Number of single family units: 29 2. Number of multiple family units: -0- 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 10 -'84 . Earliest date of occupancy: 4-'85 Model 4 and r of Tentative S. .Bedrooms Price Range C1 I -4 PHASE 4 TOTAL a G'Q- /3 E] 11 E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12726 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12726, hereinafter "Map" submitted by A -M Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a total development and subdivision of 4.28 acres into 33 lots, regularly cage before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on September 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public_ hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tent °tive Tract No. 12726 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable Injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public .t large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. V Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts o^ the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Nap No. 12725, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The proposed map and site plan (setbacks) shall be reviewed by the Technical Review Committee prior to map rECOrdation. 2. Due to the open space interrelationships, no building permit may be issued for any lot in this map without permits for Tentative Tract 12727 already being issued. 3. The proposed retaining wall saown on the east_ property line shall be deleted so that the existing slope bank on Tract 12414 is preserved. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. Avalon Street shall be reconstructed, as needed, for proposed connection to the private street portion to the satisfaction of the City Engit,ier. 2. Aesthe.ically appropriate signing shall be installed to d:.tinguish public from private streets at the affected intersections to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. .APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING ccM.MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY -- Dennis L. Stout, Chainnan ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary Resolution No. Page 3 11 I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: RYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ICJ pro E G C_ c � G s _G .. ✓LL =• c _oo -� j S u O G i 6�� q c✓� u J E ✓ vn7 ��• _ O O ✓ • _� N 44 •�C:_6 -GC ✓ .C.r i c c c -• ' I Cc. .' .o C� •s �- C n V � V_. ° u o 9 C . ._l G L 6 tV.r G O U ✓ 7 G` �� C r L�`.�S ] O r• - �79T OG-CpOC '� p c.U�.J 1 GCE c d -co = o o Q ems-' •e cayc - L , ✓ d ` L N r M1' ^rl vI �I 7 dl C - r•�00_UC G- CVC u�� I -_4TH Jc7 .� �� -_r�P L�>� __ _L y o -E-V mil �V S O-r �_ =- 7J0 t- 7H7✓ � aC�q Lp-i ? 4CV•a .o f01V _U_ > Or N -.IV L -J C_ L� f'CN� O f O� -_ O e �_ C v C_ � �� _ L U %• 4 ` M C P _- O L -_ N_ C q' V rJ T c 0 O ✓ C.•L _ O r G •Ge [s T 4✓ N L =1 T .0 V O 'C Op✓_L _40_ >� Q'L LOGS- r.C��_J6 _LO _ - °_ on uD --•ca t v -y c cou � __� - O i C � _ __ n V V V � 'n r F N V C - C C L G v P O' - C •' �N -Jrr NN�00� =�GPOc _Oar C C- � 4 L C f r L � ^ O � YG4 V �lr - C-[GO O F - O• r-n C � � n � V - [ G O O �� C� C V 6 •Ca C L p aI I y I i 0 E G C_ c � G s _G .. ✓LL =• c _oo -� j S u O G i 6�� q c✓� u J E ✓ vn7 ��• _ O O ✓ • _� N 44 •�C:_6 -GC ✓ .C.r i c c c -• ' I Cc. .' L -NC.d I� V_. ° u o 6 rN- > 0 G O U ✓ 7 G` �� C r ] O I 1 c d -co = o o Q ems-' •e cayc - L , ✓ d ` L N r M1' ^rl vI �I 7 dl C - I C01� .� MGM _ y o Vr G O_ G s _G .. ✓LL =• c _oo -� j �a= i 6�� q c✓� u � ✓ vn7 ��• _ O O ✓ • _� N 44 •�C:_6 -GC ✓ .C.r -• ' z.-i• Cc. .' L -NC.d V_. ✓SV_�C C G O U ✓ 7 G` �� C r ] O I 1 c d -co = o o Q ems-' •e cayc - L , ✓ d ` L N r M1' ^rl vI �I 7 1 Q v G O L d c v 4 d c n. f r [ r x r rq r r oob f ` 6 J E J CV r V Y ° L ° V 4 -• V � r L O G r L G Na�ov q C C q u 4• q c u,q q F L `GO V J J V 6 V C C r y . b Roi c�cc G d V f V S Rte; q L i Vr °4rriy d V. O n n l ° V —�rrEr � c ` o o rc c -e is V O'er-• ��m r L` VSO O i c a : _i a aa• _J n V � _• G 4 L r C C a i O C+ q L C ^9 caL V J Gr r C< G Y G11 a>� 1 ir i c u q o c C _ Ge '°$= un Oye preM - p-,c uz.- T L Mcz V T C q o'o •q U r C _ D G L U GZ q i C o r C. �. •.J r r O L = p Lr V -• � LCCC'L °LLx ' a i J O r T 0 V O ` CC L = C•COC nCC 7C r L N ��- 0 1186 qvC D. �= =0y�V0 C _,V - Od >C•r `GL Ley .cu x =N'oci uteri L,.,_c °` __q vc _ G ci L.� L Euo °Gq � r N 6 F 7 G g C V - O Cr CrV COVr O O qr `yp • °i E V r x D_ a 4 ar�o - r x O q o• > C Y �n i� C C u r , C r <. Y G • ` j C O a� L C` � •� O4 ✓9 .\aVN CD Lv�e L r.r H OC'aC °i•.rl v �q p_r� q� 0 0 H •^ C ¢ a a° C9l] 4 r 2 t Y c G'^ O~ V C. O ^ y N n Q • V � f •J � p i q J_ L O _" <C V V m R O r c c cra C � O V VD 6 y J O 4 4 r 9 C V N C O q -• w q t L y a o r G r r_ •^E T y O C 9 O O L � GC C � c -•J C r C E: 6p '61 11 C _ Ge '°$= un Oye preM - p-,c uz.- T L Mcz V T C q o'o •q U r L D a 6 > GZ lqo r r L = Lr C LCCC'L °LLx °-�Cx� -]� CC °� ��- 0 1186 qvC D. �= =0y�V0 C _,V - Od >C•r `GL Ley .cu x =N'oci uteri L,.,_c °` __q vc _ � r N 6 F 7 G g C V - c' 0 L_ V q L� S 4 O O ✓ M� L C T V r x D_ C V_ •e S - r x O q o• > C Y �n i� C C u r , C r <. Y G • ` j C O a� L C` � •� _ C E r.r H �� -1 CC's =C q_V V� VrL �Jy Cruu V C 0 0 H •^ C ¢ a a° C9l] 4 r 2 t Y c G'^ O~ V C. O ^ y V � f •J � p i q J_ L O _" <C V V P r q q 7 q J r � u. G O �� L •e G 4 V' C'_ C 7 C r< _ O O° 6D•9L L r� TL' OuF yCF � Gtl N ..n20 J�V9 VG ^G -` � OT t O•n L`°. - S GC r2r CV L �c4 `• � ^r _ LM- ZVT C �r C•Cr_ >r�`� CC C�rrG yD} _ CO-^4 n c c C C C C G CC. V V TCn V_LGE —rna rL NO G�Ma Nqq GV •J G4SrC °VLTV C_Vn.°..rLC .CrrL —._ wry rCq ��S6gf m R O r c c cra C � O V VD 6 y J O 4 4 r 9 C V N C O q -• w q t L y a o r G r r_ •^E T y O C 9 O O L � GC C � c -•J C r C E: 6p '61 11 I CL nV C'i •' 9 Z i d 7 C �. T O u c P N� d y A O 4 � O C _� C L V O I ��✓ � tt A J � ° � A L. C i � q i 6. CM V J N ✓I S VA V Ac�C -` `CV y✓l � � � ✓O .6 T OC r O A C.` GG r P J O U 4 V_ q .n G C E - j_ I C N_V 4 J G� A -• C� � C _ ' _ Y CJ A —_• — T_,_ P A c U �v 6 L P D V � L _ N O b 2 l O 6 C dr __Ad L A C N V✓ � } A C A �/ A O r6_'v, G,'.` T✓ O =- r q y p O C EAU C 9 '/ 06 _. T✓ _ gNLL CGIP � S � AC�r G -vim' t � LPG 4 yV G_ -C �.Vi•O� d LCDd N CC r ° rtr ` p � U N r �CCj L D ✓ L OC_ EL A rb _ ✓._+N � �i cv r��OA ��VCL �C.�` GC can � �00✓ rC Cd CNN- FC V. G �[ O 0 NOCq Fr 1. G A D U ` N "J C r i P L. V N _✓ � L U I C V N N G� 0= 0✓ N✓ y 0 U M N O g J 9 2 C a• ✓ N ✓ r`> V 6 i n P N dGC 0 AL ; 7Z C A O. Z P G c C C. w✓ ✓l O OT• v S ✓ rGgE O'nLgN C� y c O 0 P✓ N D U _ q C> l G T A t L O_ q �• _� .h C Y- V q A r A ✓ r. q✓ r G S ✓ l =. - q A✓ 0 ✓ S A q A �N _ C. -. U M D q P .Cp q C t rj C "" `CTNq� cvG��V A AC`s q` `� -'ecC• N� u Oi` N E - 4�q qow �- O a u T V g � O V ✓ V` LINO T" E 0 q TO qO q _ N o pp OCN_�p OrgCP TC.'�G�r ��I�P V Aqr Cr Or✓ NN Ar ° N NC 9 grCb ✓ � 4✓ Pier N O- N L� R C A _ W w VO�y r N ✓_ O= q L� r C C w l U N r q C N O V O C q` w N r- l i ✓ C ./I i ✓+ u V _ Q A � '.Z: _ G V �r 4 N a V N C O C. r N ._.• N y 3 J- �/ t E � o+ .00 C6 C+ O .~. U P Cs V l 4 O° Q _ C G d_ CI q 4 W✓ I. l C✓ GnL _ c— .ay r_V � S ACC rZ C7A rAG� •_rte` �L Pb O O 4� 6 G H O C 6 M G j O N „ d q .( r • G q P py � P� •O LG ti vI AS_ r a' i°.r A r Cdr df V OI Lr V q g� cc S c �N —J �qcN ✓V _s'^ zm O O r O .�. O L i V c = •i ` Nf A _"VOC 6yGj _ n G LOn °l. yG• _ DO rI O✓ A i r � N C �DVO GG r r < M' G� G C ` G U. C✓ V 4r .- G' C �. Ic V S> U � T✓ C O � V L N C L C C U r C ` _T C_ Cr G= ✓ A`VO Le�D V ��V✓ _ _- • A _ •CAL � >. i � 4° Lim r ` a' C C r �` P �`.. N C C ✓ C V r G` V C r y r G : Z GC` �), Gr VC �N _ r =C NF ✓G` 4✓GrU _ P U✓ V_6 Iz O r [ C V_ > � r G < V < S _ O •I C < N p e W d w O p s .n - r N C N D 2 N C r L ! •1 _1 G N� ^I ~I • �� i �1 6Il) I ri 1 n�� 3 0 v C.1 0 rM- P � l• C G o q 9 mu c E C'� 4 ve _ o u cq N i as o L V V J V � ° L j V E 2toi�" O V V - r V V V N � Y O n - of 4 rl I d � i p - r C u aN 4 D � 9 = 6 i a O N O n C 0 O � u'a ' x 9 � S ` Y y ^ 4 =d =n qu M w 4 Q L � c <•nr `GG TS C C y r < < ` O 4 n o p ti rn I l =_ = 6 9 u n 4 o P t ^N V < � P puq�i < �N G q V •T• V O _ 7r Vy�` ^Jr d q r V _ r F AOUV O O G •^ V 9 O L u c O 9 c O O � n L do° a`e i y < q O T v 0 0 O L d b N� Qy YI L O u.p. V Q� o L V i - �Y•. W �u Jd r r G q n u u 4 n N -_ jq pyc u - C Y L n O — +r C G V T 0 _ G L O M M v 4" L.G ` coo is I ��v •_- < Gq 9 iQ 2S N � jyrr C`V �c1: _ �L :x SWIG V 4 o o G J V G E N F t2 V O L N C = 6=2 u i _g.. = Y C O ✓w N V =4 L r <yq V 1 O 9Cr Gy. PLO P GqL �dLn < �—..• - S G � —VRw.0 GL _ N 6 d V x -' d •- 6� C C V W V O VG- Mz%- C 2,5�•� 5 r .-.. d _ _ u rnNO z PfW LV OO- 9G GqV -' < VO lOa•r G`> �CGr 6 13�uN G•. q ~ N 1 0 ao 11 0 V — O O L p O 9 .2 r 4 C a• C � C 6 -- 9 a V q Y o.n P Cy Nr C^L -� w� PT — Y u n O va„„ P DYa N °co ccH' ip Nt rnLa G Pu C O_Y V O •<a � P— P C E. Nd — q r L^ r G V �i.• O— r � o` . r c LYL •[N O _ 9r _ N W O WYV �p ppnx Qr c _ _ N 4" L.G ` coo is I ��v •_- < Gq 9 iQ 2S N � jyrr C`V �c1: _ �L :x SWIG V 4 o o G J V G E N F t2 V O L N C = 6=2 u i _g.. = Y C O ✓w N V =4 L r <yq V 1 O 9Cr Gy. PLO P GqL �dLn < �—..• - S G � —VRw.0 GL _ N 6 d V x -' d •- 6� C C V W V O VG- Mz%- C 2,5�•� 5 r .-.. d _ _ u rnNO z PfW LV OO- 9G GqV -' < VO lOa•r G`> �CGr 6 13�uN G•. q ~ N 1 0 ao 11 0 i ��iii O � n � -' ✓ C � O y 4 a u � m�a moo. dT J c U I GN r > I ._«°. a_.o —_ mV YG _ a L a�� nc • q_ ` uN• i'c uE: •o CJ d L �0 d V y d d N �• 0 r r l N C p ` t a C C T O — — — E m ,°� - aZ° o u W n•+ S G O1 G C C w... a � r a N�� C S -°• E u.r N — C y N t W N N V Ca O N S ° Gq L` _ c .e <'✓ _ t .+Pq .-. ar i L _q ` °v ` L ull O � O I l U +-J •Vr• C099 •°n E O• •. N 6+ G� G l p G V� L q 6 0 i W i °` v g C w OC 6 L C- ry t q O J •' C l a G ` C L r V T q O y' P+ = 0 G C C C Py N n u u ° r � a W ��✓ r g O O C j -✓' L L E u L— s 4 V� o r. r T� r L c •n r � `r W E Juq r�oa `c - ° qOO _ r °TWO. O p•q a �d� u rPE_nO `V PO• ' Nq Vv O. N CrO. C Nq•r- =r �• a� •r O. .-V. �G N q 9+ C C J N L C • O V C �' G ° N T✓ _ p S ✓ C u u• _ rt q d q S L a P °oq �9✓r� 0v6 �... r� qc c4idN o V` ✓ O � L A N C '� M � V P O O O L V ,- •^ ;E u� L P 6 C > q a c" ° ✓or mac`.. `o c:NC n �_ -<. -• '°—,�N - r G ✓ O.f O Y V ^O � ' a l� C •9Jn C O O i G� V n V V C C T 4 r< C •> C� - O T °•''•ou _ P•^ =V N V �• =0 •n V L `Oq_VN N.W.J •O�'TV 5 6C`E= =I VII q °P r JO •yN Qqa> N ^J O .N poi q O G' 0 2 a a < d > �o .G 0 0 r. v U •J LO S l F L ,Ni r -1 P c q C W t 7,5-E t d� oj rb ` r G- C, I r G s• u � V � C i u n �� n � T u� O O o_. •a q0 EP L47� C `L r a ' y 9 ° �; T« q n q u C v. r� •°r C 4 N ° C � y r_ V C y M � p orV .,'•' dq - rl °W ".c. pI nq � `ate _.rq � ✓ T E V d� T w c M O � G � c p c m O O` d r N u rd`s u..H - N a r o d E 2; o _ ff \ e U t u L. C Zm +_ Ll b ^ �! C _ • 0 P o� vv oG V L T b N E _ +sc� S � L O N y — _ a SIC � d i�y: c. is < -' 7 n— q j O C y 7 u c I T IM J J x mi 0 c L 7 C a r v r c P— = W Or V 4 r Pi w V i V `c T a r - � V c c 'a o S � e� cT c f u P {I CAW oy 1 bV T L d t � 0 dL . x x w 4 rb i y C 4 M � P- C a u V V C— r V ob S L 4 P a o n i V b -rte 4 -r b ! — O +' 0 V P _ c rs r c a ` V r J � — Y b d V c a c G V O V ^ O > Q w Y Y- y 4� v � V N d O L r n— r ^ r � i J b � be P C b r y c � d � L Y N � T J V V � O t 6� d C P 0 c- 2 - ^ C -J O t c d L C O _4 O u S + 4 P b ` O > 6- V V a c M T C 4 q L M E d� C 4 O O r O `o m� 4 � a V w N V ~ 4 O r i- O -� C �• r u Pb d T r OV c v. b W N T C — L � p V 4 ` a U c M� l i a s a o � O V O C O w a°, �3 L d a r o� S x ~ � F C � 7 d r L S + O V L + n r °u � e 7 u ° T d � o , V V sc � n T S + q .+ate > V V pCM + b C u C L G 11 E i,l J V b z C c= 4 9 4 4 �I — S w V 0 O y no b � O r � r• a � Q L C ^ O nr E a �J l V G t n Ni `0)��"i Aab V ' r •r• = i I I 6N I I �J <AU a c =cc - - 0 P o� vv oG V L T b N E _ +sc� S � L O N y — _ a SIC � d i�y: c. is < -' 7 n— q j O C y 7 u c I T IM J J x mi 0 c L 7 C a r v r c P— = W Or V 4 r Pi w V i V `c T a r - � V c c 'a o S � e� cT c f u P {I CAW oy 1 bV T L d t � 0 dL . x x w 4 rb i y C 4 M � P- C a u V V C— r V ob S L 4 P a o n i V b -rte 4 -r b ! — O +' 0 V P _ c rs r c a ` V r J � — Y b d V c a c G V O V ^ O > Q w Y Y- y 4� v � V N d O L r n— r ^ r � i J b � be P C b r y c � d � L Y N � T J V V � O t 6� d C P 0 c- 2 - ^ C -J O t c d L C O _4 O u S + 4 P b ` O > 6- V V a c M T C 4 q L M E d� C 4 O O r O `o m� 4 � a V w N V ~ 4 O r i- O -� C �• r u Pb d T r OV c v. b W N T C — L � p V 4 ` a U c M� l i a s a o � O V O C O w a°, �3 L d a r o� S x ~ � F C � 7 d r L S + O V L + n r °u � e 7 u ° T d � o , V V sc � n T S + q .+ate > V V pCM + b C u C L G 11 E i,l J V b z C c= 4 9 4 4 �I — S w V 0 O y no b � O r � r• a � Q L C ^ O nr E a �J l V G t n Ni 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAitilONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1984 70: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12727 - A -M COMPANY - A residential sus — ivision creating Z1 single family residential lc--s and one open space lot on 2.6 acres in the 'Dw Mecium Development District (4 -8 du /ac), to .esL of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street - APN 202- 032 -69, 70, and 71. Related File: Tract 12414, Tentative Tract 12726 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a site pl,.n, building elevations, and subdivision map B. Purpose: Development of 21 single family residential units C. Location: West of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street D. Parcel Size: 2.6 acres E. Existing Zoning: Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) F. Existing Land Use: The majority of the site is vacant, one existing single family house is developed but is proposed to be removed. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Low Medium Residential South - Single family residential under construction, Low Medium Residential East - Single family residential under construction, Low Medium Residential West - Single family residential under construction, Low Medium Residential ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 12727 - A -M COMPANY September 12, 1984 Page 2 H. General Plan Prnject Site North - Low South - Low East - Low West - Low )esignations- - Low Medium Reside Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential ntial (4 -8 du /ac) (4 -8 du /ac) (4 -8 du /ac) (4 -8 du /ac) (4 -8 du /ac) I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is presently developed with one single family residential home. The majority of the site remains vacant and grass and weeds are indigenous to the area. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: This project is an extension of the approved Tract 2414 that is currently under construction, surrounding the property. A minor portion of Tract 12414 is being incorporated into this map, but does not affect the function or design of the already approved map. The proposed units are identical to those presently under construction. The subject map is related to Tentative Tract 12726, also being reviewed at this evening's meeting. The subject map proposes a private street system that will connect into the private street system associated with Tract Map 12414. The common open space provided in this map will be maintained by a homeowners' association tnat will also be incorporated if, the homeowners' associations of Tract 12414 and Tentative Tract 12726. For these reasons, the three maps could be considered as one development in that the same association will provide maintenance for all three properties and the units in all three developments will be consistent with one another. The open space provided by this tract is approximately 13,100 square feet. This equates to 11.54% of the overall site. The following table shows an open space break down of what is being provided in Tentative Tract 12726, Tentative Tract 12727 and Tract Map 12414. Open Space Tract Number Acreage Provided ract 11.58 acres 1-T6 acres Tent. Tract 12726 4.28 acres 0 Tent. Tract 12727 2.6 acres .30 acres Overall Develcpment (Tract 12414, TT x2726, TT 12727) 18.46 acres 1.55 acres % of Tract hmg- 11.54% 8.4% M E E \J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 12727 - A -M COMPANY September 12, 1934 Page 3 As can be seen from the table, approximately 8.4% of the overall I8 -acre site is being provided in open space. This adequately meets the minimum 5% standard presently required by the Development Code. There are suggested amendments to the open space requirements of the Optional Standards of the Development Code changing the 5% minimum area to 10% minimum open space area. Due to the fact, however, that the majority of the open space being provided was in large, aggregate usable areas, both Committee's determined that the subject site was appropriate in meeting the intent of the Development Code in providing usable open space area. Lot "A" of this tract does not propose any active recreational facilities, but rather a passive recreational facility, one which could be used for informal soccer, football, or family types of play activities. The open space lot provided in Tract 12414, being developed to the soui.h, proposes active recreational facilities such as a pool area, picnic and barbecue area, as well as open space passive areas for informal family gatherings. In addition to the opera space being provided, the developer is proposing to landscape the front yards of each of the residential lots. This is in keeping with the Optional Standards of the Development Code. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed this project and felt that the overall design was consistent with the existing project under construction to the south, east and west. The Committee also felt that the project was compatible with the tentative tract map being proposed on the westerly boundary side of Tract 12414. The Committee recommended approval of the proFased subd'vision map, site plan, and elevations. They also reccTinended that a landscape easement maintained by the homeowners` associatio., be provided in Lots 13, 14, and 21 abutting Bear Creek Avenue. This was recommended due to the entrance and tfhs maintenance of the side yard area for the benefit of the tract and its residents. A condition to this effect has been provided in the attached Resolution for your consideration. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee recommended approval of-the subject site with its private street circulation system. Conditions regarding signing of the private street system and other related matters have been included as conditions in the attached Resolution. 7'yl -.3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 12727 - A -M COMPANY September 12, 1984 Page 4 E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed ty the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the environmental assessment and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause signficant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, building design and site Plan together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Report as a public hearing item and notices have been sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this subdivision map. V. RECOMMENCATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution and appropriate conditions approving the subdivision map, site plan, and building elevations, and issue a Negative Declaration for the project. ecty:,o%y submitted, RG:LD:jr Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut "A" - Location Map "B" - Subdivision Map "C" - Site Plan "D" - Landscape Plan "E." - Grading Plan Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions ?e)�J_/ E.I. E. ' Nrr ETON j j IWr� L LM 3 : LM 600 RADIUS LINE j Sr_, i !� 1 MIGNpMQTT[ ST J l - _ LM i 0.I ii V- I 1 j I rvcr .o. .z... "► LM -- LM ��` I ' ► � i I ��i I I 1 I i .OI+TE vl,.♦ Lp: i cici ^o r, SITE UTILIZATION MAP s't_ - - - - -- -- --- -- - - -- —; TENTATIVE TRACT 12727 \ORTH !CITY OF 1TEAi= Tr t27�.7 ►� RANCHO CUGUNIO\GA TI -PLE= >,rGA'110 s f4a? PLANNING DIVISION Ext31riT- 4A" SC;NLE: 7;71;7--5 'A.S. 17; Lm TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12727 d. SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAkx,,, to�NCxA PLANNING DIV Lq ON -'7" ITEM-. f L al aX7 41 TITLE: UW47.�ien Mup Gel iIii?T� / Z;, 17-60, r-� NNORT H �- I 11 LM i Z 77�1- LM 'A.S. 17; Lm TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12727 d. SUBDIVISION MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAkx,,, to�NCxA PLANNING DIV Lq ON -'7" ITEM-. f L al aX7 41 TITLE: UW47.�ien Mup Gel iIii?T� / Z;, 17-60, r-� NNORT H �- I 11 t., .C.rOn(T1L — STKLT MIS 171/:: - -7 pn TENTATIVE TRACT NC. 12727 DETAILED SITE PLAN Y J. T7DiC4l NOUS( pKNSrOM 15V FORTH CITY OF Imm: TT 197a7 RAINCI �O C;CANIONGA Tom: Slte P�C.r PLANNING DIVISION L\I-iI m "C' OALL-- xv � •7 7c..T-= -_0�.. V' ••=, PROPOSED PLANT UST TENTATIVE TRACT NQ. 12727 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN tl CITY or RANCHO CUCATMOINGA PL'UNNINC. DIVISION ITE M: TT 1a7427 TITLE: Gander EXHIBM 11'a sauu: IWI-7 V NORTH 0 U 1 rdO t n 1 No. 124:4 U3. M S4 -3i 1 LM. N TETATIVE TRACT N0. 12727 ® CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN t CITY OF RANCHO CUCA NIONCA, PLANNING DIVLS NT TEX 1_ -rT red -7a7 TME, I"CIdJ' c�F�1iJ E-XHI IT: ar C r SCA �= �� G� NORTH CITY OF FOLNCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STL'D'i PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects reguirinc environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Develop---- Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff gill prepare Part II of the Initial Stud-y. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which tine the Project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no sicni -- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a sicnificant environmental i-npact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. iX7,';L7 PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract , ;�.PPLICANV S N-ME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: A -M Company 9513 Business Center Drive, Ste "C`, KCjlu UuCdmanga, Uli Nr1,ti1E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: A_M Como,nv 714 -93 -19d3 9513 Rusinpcc Center Pr 4ta "C" Rancho Cucamonga A 91ZJQ. LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) p-,t of Rpry1 and Cnuth of Mignnnettp APN 202- 032 -69 70 & oorron of 71 LIST OTHER PERIMITS NECESSA ?Y FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL., STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: CurarnnQa rnuntV WAtpr n°Ctrirt Deoartme_r,_t of Real FStatp T. I -1 W-1d 0 E ul PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 22 Unit Planned Development AC ?£AGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 2.3 Ac ^a u s - 1 existing hosp apprnx I =M S F - Approx_ 98.nnp S.E. Proposed DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPFY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIP^ALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Tho nrnipnt site fails to the southeast at approx. 3% grade The site is Curran lv vacant except for -1 house To the north is a varant field —To the wact is Tra t 1 ?414 To the south is TrsICt 12414 To the east is Tract 12414 Is the project part o= a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? NO im S WILL THIS PROJECT., I] YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial chance in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create charges in the existing zoninq or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? Yinw many? Aporox. 10 _ - X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flam-nables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: I£ the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. E CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequare evaluation can be made by the Development Review Cormittee. Date June 22, 1984 Signature +• Title Project Engineer I -3 >W X4;L 6 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The follo:+ing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: A -M Comoanv TR 12726 Soecific Location of Project: West of Beryl & South of Mignonette 1. N=ber of single fa.:.ily units: 2. Nu -tuber of multiple family units: 3.: Date proposed to begin construction: Earnest date of occupancy: Model 4 nd = of Tentative S. edroor..s Price Range PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 in 10 -'84 4 -'85 1-4 TOTAL E E L] RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12727 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12727, hereinafter "Map" submitted by A -M Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of approximately 2.6 acres into 21 single famil., lots, and one co=on open space l;.t, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on September 12, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's r rts; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12727 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmentai damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serio;,s public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not co .nflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That tFis project the environment issued. will not create adverse impacts on and a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12727, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION Z. A landscape easement, :maintained by the vroposed Homeowners' Association, shall be created on the westerly property area of Lots 13, 14, and 21. 2. Prior to final map approval of this tentative tract, a lot line adjustment, or some other acceptable procedure, must be approved to modify Lots 5 and 6 of Tract 12414, which are affected by the property line design of this tentative tract. ENGINEERING DIVISION Z. Aesthetically appropriate signing shall be installed to distinguish public from private streets at affected intersections, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: _ J C 0 i N os V vo O O_ N C V r t = 6 O � J G 0 cc V V D N V e r- c� 0 W 3 G W �I CI mi ii sl V O T O V � •, n 6� { V c o Y r C C O P � T S O C L q N O 6 O p ii p O d 09 9 •o N L O � C• � c r � M V• O w C r _ C 6 D i =1 6 t. d P Y i �LLo o .o.v a4 Pr LO0 o N t = •�• O �vQ�Py0 Naor. v` 9q 00 C � �r OT O u G o'er i— Lc co °cn J:�tv� r O G D r C L V^ 6 OO NOd V'-CV O V w L C V r D V c N C O� r F P9 V r N D > > T l ti L O n - a? O r � � L t �. < �✓ -: V- I_ C .r c r` C Y L O L O <' O• `J V�> y C q O. l � = L - u` ✓ > S ~= c L p Y` o V O - L u O r rte-' :.i p p r V q G"' `- �✓ J O V C.i 6i .n..r `J '�� `C 4OC 07` E rC' ✓ l G �V.�n O � N -✓ n V U c J c c r .. G - C � V' =` i i. i V a ✓CO �O` -G?n -V OL 7V,G00 __C \09` w r CcnO.r l O r n r Ic.. op •e _c o•L-, Y.r °mom �p� c ^.L —_ P °o� � OV VO br0 'c .�PGO 0. idCVrrJ OC L VLM F >q - V G �•� - -� a U` C V T r = 2 I •' V 'u O� O - n ✓ p O n - L � G Q O` C ✓ V y V �✓ N C• � U C � u � � V O` L N V O d.r -J - .o uC4 V L DV 00. O n.'2 "r x� N =` G�`.✓ip c_ c' °e .�. -Ga Cd �j G - -„� 'o q� r. _ N `L' og c -- Co •a anN —_L N c`o✓ d —o� o o —_— r _ = —... qN — ✓dO7y,nCO f o n _ rpnV CP= �T O u,V b� -nr 9ntP dy On OM�U�- � C G��L GC' - ��'�D� - JNra pC`D✓ q0� Py rrr � VO. -O `L Op O< V >p -n DO.b ✓u O•q> O>�=O� �•� nLOgNO � j`- `OV gG��?Nr 4uJ ✓o ✓OP - OV.nrV -vi ✓O6EC- -e C V c d? O'a � V Mac 6 L O V a • V C - r Vwr d VFdV „y -OqP O .n -� n ✓GL.r L>_ VD Nr V O ` =GMD - ✓ rVOp n C b n V C O P V n✓ O n �J �n O7✓ �VibtpDO c, = �✓ c ✓` �d p VNIV� �T VKE o`- .disv`v s .',.L ei� o. �o�n' —�. cb <M�d °o.°om �c °a: `G i+ ccbu .°+ ✓i < <•°o 0 0 i N os V vo O O_ N C V r t = 6 O � J G 0 cc V V D N V e r- c� 0 W 3 G W �I CI mi ii sl V O T O V � •, n 6� { V c o Y r C C O P � T S O C L q N O 6 O p ii p O d 09 9 •o N L O � C• � c r � M V• O w C r _ C 6 D i =1 6 t. d P Y i �LLo o .o.v a4 Pr LO0 o N t = •�• O �vQ�Py0 Naor. v` 9q 00 C � �r OT O u G o'er i— Lc co °cn J:�tv� r O G D r C L V^ 6 OO NOd V'-CV O V w L C V r D V c N C O� r F P9 V r N D > > T r O O- u U �' ^v u •n V° �: U• C _ _U d O L l V D r` FF r u 7 O.' O u C C'1 n V -- _ r.• T °C V �C� •C S•°n n. GLq L LDCG rnr C - _ - LLn' r V O V_ O c _' - -r o � r t+ � V �°.• c. O. N_ .n. r. p ° °V+'+ °'i r _ fl6 d� CVY LOOT __ LL�•O -OV rNp - ^ 06i� 'w q ry dU.LiC qVy_ - O_�� C. j d V N y r V C C� e. �. �. � C q C i� C O✓ T O o O Er ✓° L 'r L °O °Q� q�N CL V C O:. q C e � N •� u- q P` .... L V d L _V _r C V � `� _ �� - OT u C V V O = � y 4 L 'J V L C E � p L r C. u v✓ •Li. d Y' pL^ Lpu �. UdU ✓ `.T.�G rL 7 d✓.n0 � -G =u -L"Oe' ._i-JC °✓ --..QP r �_ 4v do_ _�O CVO: -d i_L _L^ =L °pOC •N•o�`rc_. Yo -_ic°, °' � =�c a✓r' :•c u= °o °r .°. _ q - '- ""<.pw -TO ✓�� L � Psi c yo' ._nom✓ � yi° l cN .=/r '.J V ✓ p O G_ V. y V ._ .-• }oc U' N T =� -Lf '_ O V - q d � f E °qV G Yr G - - Cork ` -o.-` °° '✓'a i 4- 14 E - - = z u p c.°..ue.- u .Qi .. .T•�ai wr° o W V c c , Y Gf .'2- = - S C L � p G V ¢ r •n C ¢ q � 0 V C� V 7O Cr °1 dTM L- V C¢ TC -277 S.'27:5 u u p a b n J T G O > c o k� r- � N u tJ k. C� C a°.•� q✓ G V T C_ C6 N.- r F r °�°° � V= O L. yw rwq_ r °� L, G`T -..•F .' - r r d" 7 Er .p TqG -O L � C O > r - -E_ >�r V Y u N °� C ✓ i GC rN fj tcgr r O aq�gOV Vq CC..•a ¢V9�fTl CVO �N✓ l iL T U O r PV ✓� -• q C 7_ d P L n T N O � C � OL q s-c°•_ d r�a� g E �° E O. r0 Maw G0. VPOL q_SC ~r✓L VL CO O.d `°' °S OC _ Cn O.n O• =rrl •L•rLr CO °i =�> 6` qyr �s q d ✓ r u r =� T-r .0 u °-L qO Z-11 v07 k V C q C✓ r _ .,"-• S C U l • � C O C Y¢ - T -C ` °G•�~ �= ic.GO�° O` Y`: VCye r d -°<'N v Y >d or`� cd- _- cc ^rw .c ocr.c wic,° u__ ... ✓'°^ 7Z _ 2 i O aq rL U dG� > L C 0��1 -lC -L n O n D .nOTIL �O r C O {Y _ T C° °,4C rw r r L L C °_ • P �c�c ✓y q_c ; = °' ooL `c c °i = _LFC_ °_ ca.°•. q .-.T? d•°p r u5 ,-ate "L �$ -L = -' - °d °v •w r� �� °" _ L o w 2 r P : � c r i� V� ✓ r o� '^ c r ... T V G•- VO.n ?Oun -FaOC r°p' Cw �Ui -rG C UCVC = �OC`G -� Ta C - O ✓V E mcC rV C nr ��c.L� is +__ CO�c °- YceP. yea 4 a `. :•:s- v o _,: ,., °v nre�_✓ _ M O _P E � v° •l > ^ O ° �L _0 p' � u l r T� O G 4 °^ �� , O O > C rqqCC - G V V rCf 6 -wa vrq•Oe 4V ��t � 642�P�� rya �Cq �•�q¢q� -{n��V N 11 � ==,cis r "-e u o i _ �, i• <• - _ _v o V L Pr C •'f `<O.0 < O V a y. v y 7 T 9 V O r >� C u N C �. C Y C C� � y I V c ✓ p` T O L �- M �G��co °areN °,�a_ i:G'p .c .a O� c� C =d u• -✓.✓ � O r P✓ ` ✓ p er ^- L C � W H O C c°i iJ C V 6 � F L � ✓ n n O P U C O V y u u 7 l d V V L O N V 4N - V d yd�V NM ''� „JS C`°„- ✓ N6N 9 rL>� V yF C- y .°.. PU cpr QP 4N ✓_ry L O ^ MN�r ✓Q P_N =_O q l -1 -r =G ✓NS 9 ° C V V ',Cy •^^ V ' c�9 COTS p�� n L .��C`` V V•o •Vn t 'Y p.✓ n` .°.•T` CqO ° VZG O ^�� ✓�U < vco Dona dL 1�� pr.0 C � c• °.mom N ��C C29...• Ep0 = cn c° 'c'n�✓ `_ u co° d g o c d .' o..✓ c' r e _ NOYVV _^ NL'VC ✓ P r qOd ` •�P N✓u✓ p ✓NW NOy4:!V C� Z �! W V C 0 u y. A n j y e� O. 6 o N t= N .L+ N N y 3 0� ✓ L � � q C n W VV ^VO =L ✓L L Cr r._E N OY G C r N h 9 k: N L 6C0 d NT ✓9E L✓6i0 O cC� O c ° =�N ° ^+a i u•” r.o c� �o ` nn 6 L uo c ��no. ��'_ r ? N� �` �� Y i✓ N �O _ a^..n Mjp'.:o -oo r r0 C _ V ° < NCdC C ^`� ✓ dP -W qCN ;V _ '"✓ opcM -ce � ao ✓ycq d a ?�L ups •ce _ °r c• <a ^._ a <•o� LNr cc� c�u- qux v «4 JnL Y. -uoi y V C z r ; p✓ L u -•w °O c.. qt vi L C9Q0 =•.CL L ` 'Jd q °�N r-T q V ^n ` SGr O<" LC'.r VL ES�•"� _- 4GN -Z a ^ C� ✓ n d T < ` No p C; V d O ✓- � �� C J I Ll V ✓ ° Q y V w W N <. ^ y V r ^� d l G - r O C L G `.. v�-�� j E d � N au evN � n° au tvL � o.• a c•+ .. o.a V .:oi o pi - �- 6 NI �� Iz NI bl i �� I �I � 6' ✓�� /l 1 O W `�9 c E V o~ V •. i-r� ° 7a_ _• -OU C� D J - V9O py C °V'9 •7 -'ice �r �. � =_ r pL =� �_ - .�i =_ -`, �' _ a C S C -� i n ° •Vj � 7'I tI O � V C v n 0 c 's• ^- =y.J pNO Y-i.V �� j`C .�� 7 P•n PE VL u 6 nt]�N Lam^ -i�0 w• Y� 6Va v.�° y � ^� 9� V V; MI •I N _I ^ N =1 O� - r N e O ° u i- n E c° n � c •I °� u - -^ C ° O N •^ V V •• ° U p- r q Y C I �`' n Y _ r -_ .' :-�.= orP -• --^ °.r ��° ^ E . X0_:3° `Oo L 2 - E �° V V V •J - .=i. �- T .'• _ ° l u Y G Y L O T G_ y n E V PP c Vo m= PEA Vc9.= nO °nV r Q v0 °`OO_. r4 Q C o n v a! V W E C E c: 42 ar•. �cn c` I �Y�V+n wee V 7w-191 E Ll Kw 11 ^ ur � C V O (� v NI i� ° i G " c P q ry P 9 i � G O y V O V V L a G j n T M P O O � c - ua..Li c ° 0 p O c O 0 9 a 4 C G C T c= a ] CJ r O V ` v N51 I f G C r ( f °n GN9 t � i o rCe i I L J ? V = C1 = •:l = O � E i°� G. u i 6 i r9i• 9 W C == O 7 E Kw 11 ^ ur � C V O (� v NI i� ° i G " c P q ry P 9 i � G O y V O V V L a G j n T M P O O � c - ua..Li c ° 0 p O c O 0 9 a 4 C G C T c= a ] CJ r O V ` v N51 I >'yl -a 6 f ` L 4d =c °n GN9 r rCe � L r >CO ••O yi•4 r00�� -Cj •:l = O � E i°� C H M V p0 0� i 6 i r9i• 9 W C == > u 1 I � =o 00 nu C r 9 V •+ N� � i ufl� t -• - V ` U E O d � v p •fir = p � � G V >` L V �� l O C 4 v V n u C Ll>- V L ` •r''s rn ,- 4 0 J� _ C O C E q E °� °^ V 4 9 r^ VCn•Oi ° ^�.' VcV CG 'C �_ ' —tea _•- ° ° � �t —�i ".°. "p. '� � - I yl y _ COUr � u ^r Te °V ^P VI �9 V O .w •Oi ^yMU n �� n�� o GrV rn -• C i � � Y `-nn_ N 6ec� rOY C��•+ ^NIC�i� Q 00 4rn NVaNr 4 °O �O »>r Oor E�i 4I a rmav 60V28 Pr. zf GI -( N '_ rn N C ,O O ^ ' 9° °. w 9 d n u• -�-,P^ q ,n, t V V_ c r• � d d � F! —+r VV 6T � K-•1iG 6V� Gq SO't vZ ° 4°.ron rnC 6i r0 r0 p Q b N >'yl -a 6 f ` L 4d =c °n GN9 r rCe � L r >CO ••O yi•4 r00�� -Cj •:l = O � E i°� C H M V p0 0� i 6 i r9i• 9 W C == > w C r 9 r N� r_ L V C 4 v V n u C Ll>- V L ` •r''s rn ,- 4 0 J� _ C O C E q E °� °^ V 4 9 r^ VCn•Oi C ^�.' VcV CG 'C ^ Y O C VI yl y _ COUr � u ^r Te °V ^P VI �9 V O .w •Oi ^yMU n �� n�� o GrV rn -• C i � � Y `-nn_ N 6ec� rOY C��•+ ^NIC�i� Q 00 4rn NVaNr 4 °O �O »>r Oor E�i 4I a rmav 60V28 Pr. GI -( N w >'yl -a 6 f V .O G C G v c c ° C C a c c c e v V ✓ u � V A _. N ✓ y y u p ° � O T �. � w O _ •J t • '_ � _ � � •� j� O� •n W > O� `' L �� q T N� V >• d � V r •A.• � N r N l q I 1 W _ Ti L° d C w V 6 >� •G.• q° is � _ M os_ c = a c '•� � _ c cc ` •n d — _ C i _ _ ti •n q N t q✓ ✓ G V "L A �V�ir� �• l V f V n r C C' G d •rn> c C ✓ �� 6_ _ — w r r N O UO�V G r w •) C� V V•` 7 c C � c C T ^ c. .• V L _ I � 6 G A 7 V O V D O •J C O r O �Gj � C C\ P � q l ✓ <6 V_ u t •' � D � � C C q V _ _' rJ O � �` -Ci _V L V .uU• I O d ✓ L V V r U C VO w? V C V• O 6 \D �= a 6 W A` i 9 TDT Gt �v u9N 1 OL �_ c A v MG• Vr O•O•G'C A w9 V_ G � 7Gp V•n O} Vw t rC A O� OI tJI O ' r•G� dC dL V G d rr kfA C CE _u0 bwV r � trl _ L I G_O AV L •'f O. \ r � O_ V q U_ O d_ ° C U 6 W r •n l � V 3 2 V •.� 7� _ O O i s ✓ V A uI I •`u 6 6 •n C w .V•• 3 O N i C G v c c ° C C a c c c e v L I i �i •I �I El t r '_ i r• C c j� O� •n W > O� `' L �� q T N� V >• d � V r •A.• � N r N l q I 1 W _ Ti L° d C w V 6 >� •G.• q° c cc q✓ ✓ G V "L A �V�ir� �• AW t V f V n r C C' G d •rn> c C � c C T ^ c. .• V L _ I � 6 L I i �i •I �I El i 1 b-� U :1 O E 11 i •- n. u = V O -J C � c d � � C u u P7 4 2 O O r � O r n 1 C + O r V V O L V 6J V q Sr0 a. =_ Y 3 � l .coo° 4_ a y V N � r 9 C d r C V V 1? c o-. t q e (04r� V`T r O 4 IN V n mi C � v V Y ze 2 Q u + C L _cam y + y O 4 r ' . OC 1 L J ll� \v iI O 0 4 W v C a c E P � S y O T v V V_ 4 G r P� O.. v P? N O 0 6 .r V N v C � 0 C O PW O 9V r L t r O 0 o > n ru Y —v � y O O� r Ni r 4 i r Ov., p O cr OP Vy 4+ 9W r `lJ e� u L P 4 o c _r '� O 1 4 r O �� •n° q e E 9i� 4.7 0= ✓r �� py� L V O U L L « S Z v q ° O E ` q O a N w n r C � M r . d � � M V G C 1 7 =P qLo L'O q Gq V G C M ♦ 7 L� 0 d V 6 L C < 6 ti n i r LJ 11 CT Ty OF RANCHO CUCAM0NIGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1934 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY I. BACKGROUND: On July ii, 1984, the Commission directed staff to prepare Haven Avenue policies which provide clear direction to the development community as to the appropriate land uses and style of development for Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. To that end, a Resolution is attached to this staff report for Commission review and consideration. Following Commission input, staff will begin preparation of an Industrial Specific Plan amendment implementing a Haven Avenue overlay district. II. ANALYSIS: As discussed in the July 11, 1984 staff report attached , Haven Avenue provides a rare opportunity for the City to enhance its image by providing intensive, high quality office and professional development along a significant gateway into the community. Current market conditions, are conducive to development of low intensity, multi- tenant buildings fer commercial or lig;it industrial uses, and the high exposure along Haven Avenue is attractive to retail uses and strip commercial development. In addition, current land costs, particularly ainng the central portions of the corridor still justify single story, low intensity development. Expansion of these uses, however, will adversely affect the attractiveness of Haven Avenue for future high -end offiLl park development. The pressure to develop commercial or interim projects along Haven Avenue is, in part, created by the wide range of uses permitted by the Industrial Plan, suodivisions which create fragmented lot patterns, and lack of adopted development policies or design guidelines specifically for Haven Avenue. III. IMPLEMENTATION: To provide direction to the development community, the attached Resolution defines the City's design goals for Haven Avenue and provides interim development policies. These interim policies relate to land use, master planned developments, site orientation, streetscape and landscaping, open space /pedestrian environment, and architecture. The followinq is a summary of the policies: ITEM N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corridor Study September 12, 1984 Page E, A. Land Uses: The land use policies establish office as the primary function of the corridor. Service and support commercial uses are limited to 20% of the floor area of any project. B. Master Planned Developments: The intent of these policies is to eliminate new subdivisions which create fragmented lot patterns. Master plans will be required for all aevelopment proposals and subdivisions. This will allow for integrated master planned developments with the use of reciprocal parking and access, and permit pedestrian and vehicular movement between parcels without interferring with traffic flog on Haven Avenue. C. Site Orientation: The site orientation policies deal with vehicular circulation and parking, building placement, pedestrian circulation, and orientation of service and loading areas. The intent of these policies is to group buildings closer to the street with pedestrian courtyards between buildings and perimeter vehicular circulation and parking areas. The policies limit, rather than exclude, parking at the Aft streetscape setback to provide design flexibility and allow the front of buildings to face Haven Avenue. D. Streetscaoe and Landscaping: The most significant policy in this section is the increased landscape coverage from 15% to 30%. The intent is help create the campus -like image and a pleasant pedestrian environment. Also, the increased landscape coverage reduces the buildable area of the site, thereby encouraging multi -Story structures. E. Open Space;Pedestrian Environment: These policies encourage centralized pedestrian courtyards or plazas between buildings separated from vehicular parking or circulation. Design elements of the plazas are also specified. E. Architecture: The proposed architectural policies are provided TO respond to major design issues. The intent is to discourage typical multi- tenant buildings seen elsewhere in the City which may be low profile, linear, rectangular, and blocky with store front elevations, numerous roll -,p doors, and with architectural treatment limited to insignificant recesses and material changes. In addition, a progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of architecture is identified to establish a theme and distinguish Haven Avenue from o14er special boulevards in Rancho Cucamonga. ,;;r2— --;z' n U Haven Avenue Corridor Study September 12, 1984 Page 3 G. Urban Centers: This section deals with policies designed to distinguish development near the intersections of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard from the central areas of the Haven Corridor. Development near these key locations will be more intensive to create community focal points or "urban centers ". IV. OVERLAY DISTRICT: Following Commission review of the proposed interim policies, staff will begin preparation of a Haven Avenue Overlay District. The overlay district should be presented to the Commission at their October 10, 1984 meeting and will amend the Industrial Specific Plan and require review by the Planning Commission and City Council at advertised public hearings. The overlay district will permit adoption of a specific set of land uses for the Haven Avenue corridor, in addition to the interim development policies. V. RECo"MENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission r -ceive a'.7 public input and review and comment on the proposed intcrir, development policies for Haven Avenue. After such co ^�i_ar_t:on, the Commission may adopt the Resolution and give fi;a di.-action to staff to prepare the Haven Avenue Overlay Respectf,0 1t• submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:CJ:jr Attachments: July 11, 1984 Staff Re)ort Haven Avenue Resolution 72—,3 CIRCULATION i i 20' R.O.W. 100' R.O.W. 88' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE Existing Proposed TRA:LS /ROUTES 0 0 0 o Pedestrian 0000 Bicycle Regional Mufti -lase Special Streetscape/ Landscaping Power Line/ Utility Easement �•�� Creeks & Channels n Bridge + Access Points 1Park 0 Fire Station T //- 7 U 17 2 0 E- E C TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA v1O.NG A STAFF REPORT Chairman ana 'members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE CORRIDOR STUDY C i07 I. ABSTRACT: This report outlines the concerns and opportunities associated with development along Haven Avenue, and suggests a goal statement for the Haven Avenue corridor. In addition, several alternatives are presented for Commission review in the areas of land use, architecture and site planning. Staff is requesting policy direction relative to the goal statement and to each of the alternatives presented. II. BACKGROUND: Recently, significant concerns have been raised regarding the land use, building configuration, site planning, and style of architecture most appropriate and desirable for Haven Avenue. Two projects which were recently denied by the Planning Commission highlighted the need for more defined design goals, policies, and development regulations for Haven Avenue. The Commission dir,eted staff to prepare a Haven Avenue Study outlining the purpose of Haven Avenue, the desired image, and policy alternatives which the Commission may wish to pursue. The intent of the study is to provide clear direction to the development community as to the appropriate land uses and style of development for Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. III. SETTINS: Haven Avenue is located near the geographic center of the Ci +.y and will be the most significant gateway into Rancho Cucamo*iga. The importance of Haven Avenue is highlighted by future and planned development which includes the County Law and Justice Lenter, the future Civic Center, and Barton Plaza at the north end of the study area near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard. South of the City, on raven below 4th Street, the Ontario International Center is planned with a major hotel to be developed in the near future. In addition, Haven Avenue provides access to Chaffey College and will be a major entryway into Ontario International Airport. PLANNING COMMISSIOV - -TAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corrib_,• Study July 11, 1984 Page 2 Another important aspe:t is the distinctiveness of Haven Avenue in relation to other "Special Boulevards ". The four most significant corridors in the Cite include Foothill Boulevard, Archibald Avenue, Milliken Avenue, and Haven Avenue. Each corridor has a distinctive functicn and should ultimately project a different image. Haven Avenue has the potential for high -end office development with a unique combination of direct access to the airport and Chaffey College, a major travel route centrally located in the City, and planned and developing high -end projects to spur future development. Foothill Boulevard on the other hand is viewed as the hub of commercial activities with emphasis on shopping center development. The character of Archibald Avenue, for the most part, already has been established with a proliferation of low profile industrial buildings and a mix of office, commercial, and residential land uses. Development of Milliken Avenue will be influenced by the adjacent industrial land uses which include Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial, General Industrial, and General Industrialjnail Served land uses. Haven Avenue provides a rare opportunity for the City to enhance its image by providing intensive, high quality office and professional development along a significant gateway into the community. The General Plan affirms that travel routes are predominant elements of the community's image since people observe the City while moving through it. The General Plan also encourages the distinctiveness -)f individual districts and roadway corridors and states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image or the perception of a route. Language in the Industrial Specific Plan states that the Industrial Park category and Haven Avenue should be designed to project a "campus like image for firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment with high prestige value ". Typical uses include office and professional, research and development, light industrial, and business support services. IV. CONSTRAINTS: There are a number of current conditions which can seriou y hamper implementation of the design goal for Haven Avenue. The most significant constraints were epitomized by the design of the two projects recently denied. They include the following: 1. High exposure along the corridor is attractive to retail commercial busineses. 2. The linear street frontage is conducive to strip commercial. The proposed buildings were designed to maximize exposure and visibility of individual shops. W-6 C L' A PLANNING COMMTSSICV- STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue CorriR_r Study July 11, 1984 Page 3 3. Land costs along the Haven Avenue corridor require higher per square foot costs that other arias in the Industrial Plan. 4. The central portions of the corridor are not yet attractive to high -end office /professionzl. 5. Current market demanis. The above factors create pressures for development cf commercially oriented projects or projects of an interim nature such as lumber outlets, carwashes and similar uses. Expansion of the commercial activities, however, will adversely affect the attractiveness of Haven Avenue for high -and office park development and will preclude the implementation of any desiar. goals. Another concern is whether the desired character and quality of development can be maintained along the entire length of the corridor. Of particular concern is the area near 8th Street and the railroad tracks. This location is probably the least desirable on the corridor considering existing land uses and the limited access and visibility when the future railroad underpass is constructed. V. POSSIBLE CAUSES: The Pressures to develop commercial or interim <4— projects along Haven Avenue are, in part, created by the following factors which the City has the authority to regulate: 1. Wide interpretation of the types and extent of commercial uses permitted along the corridor. Listed uses in the Industrial Specific Plan pertain to all of Subareas 6 and 7, and no distinction is made for appropriate uses on Haven Avenue. 2. Subdivisions permitted and previously adopted along the corridor have generally created fragmented lot petterns which do not promote master planned development of office complexes or centers. Often the subdivider attempts to maximize the number of lots adjoining Haven Avenue for marketing purposes. 3. There currently are no adopted development policies or design guidelines specifically established for Haven Avenue. Current technical standards (parking, setbacks, design, etc.) do not provide clear cut direction as to the appropriate image or style of development. To alleviate the torrent ambiguity, development policies, land use regulations, and /or design standards which are intended to protect the corridor for high -end projects could be considered. The following section outlines alternatives for implementing the design goal for Haven Avenue. W^ PLANNING CommisSIOr -TAFF REPORT Haven Avenue CorriL.- Study July 11, 1984 Page 4 VI. 1MP "_ MENTATION: Considering the setting of Haven Avenue and combining the intent of the General Plan and industrial Specific Plan with input from the Commission, the following goal is suggested for your consideration: Encourage master planned development along the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the City and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus like setting with high prestige identity. This section provides alternatives ;which the Planning Commission may pursue to implement the design goal for Haven Avenue. The alternatives are categorized in three major topic areas: Lard Use, Architecture, and Site Planning. Under each topic area, three alternatives ranging from virtually no change to substantial change in current text are presented for the Commission's consideration: A. Land Use: The intent of the following alternatives is to promote land uses and /or development which enhances Haven Avenue's image. The Commission may pursue and one or coma ;nation of three basic alternatives outlined below: Alternative 1: No revisions to allowable land uses along the corridor. Instead, rely on specific design guidelines regulating architectural form and site planning. The success of this alternative will depend on the effectiveness of the design guidelines, since the style of a building inherently determines the type of business which can locate in it. (As an example, a multi -story office building would not be suitable for a lumber or hardware store.) There will, however, be conflicts if market pressures for support commercial continue. On the other hand, if the design guidelines are not effectively implemented, the current ambiguity as to type and style of development desirable on Haven Avenue will remain. Alternative 2: Establish a tangible floor area ratio which sets a maximum percentage of any building that may ue devoted to support commercial uses. 11 11 PLANNING COMMISSIOt STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corrit-.- Study July 11, 1984 Page 5 This alternative would provide clear direction as to the amount of each project or building which may be devoted to support commercial. Projects which are solely of a commercial nature would not be permitted. With this alternative, the Commission must establish the appropriate percentage of support commercial, such as 10% to 30 %. Alternative 3; Establish a set of permitted uses specifically for Haven Avenue. Haven Avenue is located within Subareas 6 and 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan. The listed uses apply throughout each of the Subareas and little direction is provided as to the types of uses that may be appropriate on Haven Avenue. The following table lists all of the permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subareas 6 and 7. To aid the discussion, a remark column is provided suggesting whether or not the current status of each use is appropriate on Haven Avenue. ALLOWABLE LAND USES - SUBAREAS 6 & 7 Permitted Uses 1. Custom Manufacturing (Jewelry, furniture, clothing, etc. �A th on site sale of goods produced) 2. Light Manufacturing (includes research & development, laboratories) 3. Light Wholesale Storage & Dist. (Includes mini - warehouses and rail served buildings) 4. Administrative and Office 5. Building Maintenance Services 6. Bus. Supply Retail Sales /Services 7. Business Support Services Remarks Consider CUP for on -site sales Appropriate Typical architectural style undesirable and loading dock areas difficult to screen. May be undesirable. Appropriate Outside storage of raintenance trucks and equipment may he undesirable. Appropriate Appropriate Haven Avenue Corr A_,• Study July 11, 1984 Page 6 o Eating & Drinking Establishments Appropriate 9. Financial, Insurance,Real Estate Serv. Appropriate 10. Hotel / ?Motel Appropriate 11. Medical. /Health Care Services Appropriate 12. Professional Services Appropriate 13. Administrative Civil Services Appropriate Conditionallv Permitted Uses 1. Automotive Rental Fleet storage would require large parking area. 2. Auto /Licht Truck Repair - Minor Unattractive storage of cars to be repaired, open service bays and noise. 3. Automotive Sales Large parking /display areas necessary, inconsistent with streetscaN� goals. 4. Automotive Service Station Typical architectural style inconsistent with high -end office. 5. Biilding Supplies & Sales Typical warehouse building form and unattractive loading and storage areas. 6. Convenience Sales & Services Appropriate with CUP (i.e. drug store, barber shop, cleaners) 7. Entertainment Appropriate with CUP (i.e. theaters, darice & meeting halls) 8. 7Fst Food Typical architectural form and drive - through aisle out of place with high -end office buildi -las. LI E 11 PL1kNN01G COM.MISSiO;' STAFF REPORT Hazen Avenue CorriE.,r Study July 11, 1984 Page 7 9. Food & Beverage Sales a. Mini - Markets Discouraged b. Liquor Stores Discouraged c. Sandwich /Ice Cream Shops Lould be p::rmitted with CUP ,ry Appropriate 10. Funeral & Crematory Services Undesirable 11. Personal Services a. Day Care Appropriate b. Travel Bureaus Could be Permitted w/o CUP c. Photography Studio Could be Permitted w/o CUP d. Driving Schools May be inappropriate 12. Recreation Facilities a. Skating Rinks & Bowling Alleys Large bulky architectural style may be inappropriate; ok w/CUP (2) b. Health Clubs Appropriate c. Golf Courses :ow Intensity 13. Cultural a. Museum Appropriate b. Art Galleries Appropriate c. Libraries Appropriate d. Observatories Appropriate ill. 15. 15. 17. 18. Public Assembly Apprcpriate Public Safety & Utility Services Appropriate Religou:; Assembly Appropriate Ball F:eids Appropriate Public fleeting Halls Undesirable PLANSI "S COMMISSTO" "STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Ccrrii._ Study July 11, 1984 Page 8 11 °. Architecture: The objective of this t�4�ctinn is to encourage intensiv— e high quality, and prestigous o�f:ce park development along Haven Avenue. The following are three nasic implementation alternatives: Alternative 1: Require 'high quality' projects but set no policies or standards for the theme or character of architecture. This alternative relies on the current Design Review process. In addition, a great deal of flexibility is provided far th individual designer. The fault of this system is that a cohesive style of architecture will most likely not occur over tame, and the Commission will have to take a strong stance relative to denying projectE which in its opinion do not meet the stated goal. Because of the subjective nature of design, it is unlikely tha, consistent approach can b maintained over an extended period of time. Alternative 2: Establish generalized policy statements which relate to the desirable architectural theme. This alternaive could reailce some of the current ambiguity as to the Ci:y's expectations for Haven Avenue. As an example, particular key words such as progressive, modern,, sophisticated, or urban, can be highlighted to help set the desired architectural tone. Also, the designer will be allowed flexibility, but only within the parameters of the stated theme. For example, if a progressive, high tech architectural theme is established, a spanish style or tradition ?i style building would clearly be inconsistent. Alternative 3: Establish more specific design guidelines which spell out tie desired architectural theme, Form and mass, and materials, texture, and signs. This approach would go beyond the second alternative and provide design guidelines for building height, bulk, office configuration, materials, texture and signs. As examples, the guidelines could encourage multiple story office buildings versus low profile linear or warehouse structures and incentives could be provided such as not increasing setbacks for buildings over 35 fE,t in height. This approach could go as far as to specify materials such as steel and glass or poured ir. -lace concrete with accent treatment and more traditional buildi materials such as wood siding and shake or the roofs could oe discouraged depending on desired theme. In addition, st�nda :3s for particular types of signs could be developed, such as prohibiting wall can signs. % I `l 2 2 11 PLANNING COMMISSIO' `GAFF REPORT Haven Avenue CorriS -,' Study July 11, 1984 Page 9 The above alternatives go in terms of defining wish to establish more a clear consensus while areas. are dependent on how. far the Commission can the Haven Avenue image. The Commission may specific guidelines in areas where there is providing more gene —al statements in other C. Site Plannin The objective of this section is to promote integrated and master planned developments, enhance the visual quality of the Haven Avenue streetscape, and provide an attractive and pleasant working environment in a campus like setting. As with the alternatives in the previous section, the Commission must determine how specific the design guidelines for this section s': ^uld be. The Commission may wish to: A:ternative 1: Regulate site planning through the Development Review process with no new policies or standards_ Alternative 2: Develop general performance standards which outline what site planning is expected to accomplish (i.e. intearated master pla:ied development, attractive working environment, etc.); and, Alternative 3: Establish specific design guidelines to regulate various aspects of site planning (such as lot configuration, building placement, and circulation). To implement the objectives of this section, four areas dewing with site planning have been identified and inciude master planned development, site orientation, streetscape /landscaping, and pedestrian, environment. Any one or combination of the a:.ove alternatives may be aoplie t_ o eacy of these areas as discussed below. A. Master Plarned Developments: To encourage integrated and master plan development, design guidelines could be developed which rew ^late the following: Lot pat�2rn Lot size Lot dimension Reciprocal parking and access easement Access to adjacent parcels Requirements for master plans As mentioned previously in this reoort, developers generally attempt to maximize the number of i `s adjacent to Haven Avenue. The current parcel size is two acres with a minimum width of 200 feet. To encourage integrated development, guidelines could be developed to increase the minimum lot size to five acres, unless a x` %-12 PLANNING CO'MIMISSIV -STAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corrid_.- Study 'Jly 11, 1934 Page 10 master plan is prepared which addresseb items such as building pad locations, parking, and circulation. Another means would be to increase the parcel width to 300 feet (consistent with current standard for separa*_icn of drive approaches) and require shared driveways with reciprocal parking and access easements. In addition, a standard for lot depth could be established (such as 225 feet to ensure the full 45 -foot streetscape setback). B. S"Le Orientation: Design guidelines which could be de eloped under this catagory include: Encourage building placement near the street setback Discourage linear building configurations Encourage smaller parking pods Restrict and combine access to Haven Avenue Ensure safe and convenie,.' pedestrian circ cation Encourage development of pedestrian plazas Policies and /or standards for site crieitation idhich could be Provided are all interrelated and must work in conjunction with the other policies in this section to M l; implement site planning objectives. C. Streetscape /Landscaping: Design guidelines in this category could: - Require all utilities uncerground Provide attractive and consistent street urniture /i.e. street lights, benches) Require changes in street oavement, color, anj texture at key intersections Limit visibility of parking areas from the street The City currently has standards for landscaping along street frontages and in parking lots. The intent is to expand upon those standards to foster a distinctive image for Haven Avenue as opposed to other special boulevards. E 11 11 f PLANNING COMISSIO"- -TAFF REPORT Haven Avenue Corri _.• Study July 11, 1984 Page 11 D. Pedestrian Environment: Design guidelines in this categoryy would help to define the elements which create a campus like setting. Guidelines which could be developed relate to the following: Pedestrian nodes or plazas Landscaped pedestrian areas with benchs Outdoor restaurants and e.tina areas Convenient pedestrian circulation on and off site Proximity to public transit stops The Industrial Specific Plan currently has design guidelines for open spaces. These guidelines, however, are too vague and need to be expanded to be more apps icable to the Industrial Park category in general and Haven Avenue. VII. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission provide direction to staff as to the appropriate alternatives for implementing the design goal for Haven Avenue. In order to pursue the study, staff will need policy direction in the fo'lowing areas: 1. Agreement and /or direction relative to th-_ goal statement for Maven Avenue. 2. Direction relative to land use (Alternatives 1 -3). 3. Direction relative to architecture (Alternatives 1 -3). 4. Direction relative to site planning (Alternatives 1 -3). Res�ectf4.11P submitted, Rick Semez /"City Planner RG:CJ:Jr i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA PLANNING COMMISSION ESTABLISHING A DESIGN GOAL AND Ili ERIM DEVELOPMENT POLICIES FOR HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN 4TH STREET AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the Planning Col ission has expressed numerous concerns with development proposals recently submitted on Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish a design goal for Haven Avenue to guide future development; and WHEREAS, land use and development policies are necessary to implement the design goal for Haven Av ^nue; and WHEREAS, such design and development policies are needed to provid-: clrar direction and guidance to developers and staff alike. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does herebv establish interim policies for the development of Haver. Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard as follows: SECTION 1: Goal Statement. Considering the setting of Haven Avenue and combining the intent of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan, ® the goal of the Haven Avenue development and land use policies is to: Encourage master planned development alonq the Haven Avenue carr:dor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the :ity, and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasat.,, office park atmosphere in a campus -like setting with high prestige identity. SECTION 2: Land Use Policies. The intent of the following policies is to promo,(.- land uses and /or development -chat promotes the design anal for Gaven Avenu enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image: 1. The ;rimary land use function along Haven Avenue is intended to be of an administrative and professional office nature. 2. Ancillary commercial and business support service uses currently permitted by the Industrial Specific Plan, Subareas 6 and 7, shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any project. Overconcentration of such uses in any building or along the street frontage is not permitted. SECTION 3: Master Plan Develooments. To encourage integrated and Master Plan Development, tiie following policies are established: 1. Conceptual Master Plans shall be submitted with all projects (i.e., any development proposals incl_ ding subdivision applications). Master Plans shall indicate building conceptual pad locations and architecture, points Of ingress and --gress, parking lot configurations, conceptual grading and drainage, landscape and plaza areas, pedestrian circulation, and signs. 2. The minimum parcel dimensions shall be 300 feet wide and 225 feet deep except in the case of condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Plan development as defined in the above policy. 3. Vehicular access onto Haven Avenue shall be shared with adjacent parcels to promote smooth and efficient traffic circulation alona the corridor. The minimum distance between drive approaches shall be 300 feet with 100 feet the minimum distance from the curb return of any intersection. Also, reciprocal parking and access easements shall be required in conjunction with any development proposal. 4. Public transit facilities shall be designed within all Master Plans. Convenient pedestrian access shall be provided to designated transit facilities at major intersections. SECTION 4: Site Orientation. The fullowina policies are intended tc prr,note integrated, pedestrian orientated, office park development in a AM ca-apus -like setting. I. Circulation aisles and parking along street frontages and between buildings through the interior of a project shall be limited. Large parking lots must be located in areas less visible from the street, and circulation shall be provided around the rear anc side portions of a site. 2. Site plans should incorporate the use of disbursed parking areas which reduce the necessity for larca parking lots, yet provides convenient access to buildings, and does not interrupt interior pedestrian areas. 3. Building placement at the streetscape setback is strongly encouraged within all developments, particularly on corner lots with high visibility. 4. Building arrangenents must enhance safe and convenient pedestrian movement on site w'th uninterrupted landscaped courtyards, walkways, and seeing areas between buildings. 5. On site circulation for both pedestrians and vehicias shall consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian movement. 7�7—1 z7 Ancillary service and loading areas with roll -up doors shall be designed and located -,•There least visible from public view or adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park ". SECTION 5: Streetscaoe and Landsr'!oirg. The intent c is to enhance the visual quality of the streetscape re and pleasant working environment in a campus -like se The minimum landscape coverage of net lot right -of -way dedications and private stre thirty percent (30%). Pedestrian plazas shall be credited toward landscape coverage. Landscaping and berr„ing shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape, enhance building architecture, screen utilities and buffer views of automobiles, pavement, and service areas, and to define and enhance the pedestrian walkways and plazas. prohibited. utilities, including elect -ical service less than 34 shall be undergrounled. 5: Open Saace /Pedestrian Environment. The intent enhance opportunities for centralized pedestrian buffered from vehicular parking and circulation i circulation on and off site. Building configurat4sa and placement shall provide for pedestrian courtyards, plazas, or open spaces between andlor adjacent to buildings. The design of pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall provide shaded seating areas with attr ?ctive landscaping and should include water features, public art, and /or a kiosk. Benches, light standards, trash receptacles, and o street fur:.iture shall be provided in an attractive comfortable setting and shall be designed to enhance appearance and function of a site and cper space areas Convenient pedestrian circulatio.: shall b throughout all projects to connect parking public tva,isit facilities with buildings and SECTION 7: Architecture. The following policies are in- a high quality office park image with high r•restige identity. Desirable z.. lecture along haven Avenue shall project a progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development. Spanish, Mediterranean, or traditional architecture with predominant use of stucco, wood siding, shake, or the roofs is considered to be inappropriate. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass to be in scale and proportion with the Haven Avenue right -of -way and streetscape setback are encouraged. Low profile linear buildings constructed at the strpetscape are discouraged. buildings designed with retail type storefront elevations (linear configuraticns with multiple docrwa;-s ), and numerous roil -up doors are considered to promote overconcentrations of a:icillary conmerci:,i and busin=_ss support services and are therefore prohibited. entry -!.:es shall be well articulated of architectural planes and /or development to project a formal entrance appearance. Variation in depth and angle of architectural planes create variety and interest in the b--sic form silhouette of a building is required. Structures simplistic square, rectangular, or block forms prohibited. io articulate the surfaces of architectural elevations the use of openings and cavities whi:h create texture and Shadow pat' ierns and interrupt the continuity of a building Plane or surface is encouraged. Architectural treatment Of buildings shall not be limited to variation in exterior texture, pattern, color, and materials and /or shallow recesses or projections. changes in exterior materials conjunction with variation in S Of a structure. Visibility of anc'llary service and loading areas from Public view and adjoining properties must be limited to the extent possible to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. Building wall signs shall Can signs are prohibited. Of signs shall be sabmit application and reviewed design_ consist of individual letters. l:le size, number and location 'led with the Development Review in conjunction with u building SECTION 8: Urban Centers. Tre following policies shall apply i:o development near the key intersections of 4th Street and Haven Avenue and Foothi.1 Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The intent is to promote development at a level of activity and intensity sufficient to create community focal points of "urban centers ". I. Multiple story buildings of the highest office and Professional design quality are required. Desirable structural components include steel and poured in place concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spandrels and glass. Tilt -up concrete, blcck, masonary, or wood frame structures are discouraged. 2. The use of parking structures s encouraged to promote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrial plazas and courtyards. 3. Architecture, site planning, and landscaping at the immediate corners of 4th Street and Haven Avenue shall create an intensive and prestigious gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. 4. The minimum parcel size shall be five (5) acres axcept in th^ case of condominium ;Its or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Plan development. ® APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCm40NGA BY: Dennis L. Stuart, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy ecretary I, Rick Comez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of `he City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commis >ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -tc -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COWISSIONERS7 ID ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L. �J 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1984 TO: Chairman and Vembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -30 - RE.TER - The deve?oament of 4 industrial buildings totalling 76,120 square feet on 5.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209- 401-13. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan elevations and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purncse• Development of 4 industrial buildings. C. 2cation- Northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street. D. Parcel Size: 5.63 acres of land. E. Existir,, ?oning:_ Industrial Park (Subarea 6). F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant. G. Surroundina Lard Use any? Zoning: North - vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea b). South - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 6). East - Light Wholesale /Distribution; Industrial Park ( SuLarea 6) West - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 6). Y,. General Plan Oesianations: Project Site - Industrial Park. North - Industrial Park. South - Industrial Park. East - Iodustrial Park. West - Industrial Park. I. Site Characteristics: Prcject site slopes to the south at approximately a 2- grade. This site is undeveloped and is covered by indigenous weeds with no structures. . ITEK 0 E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment & DR 84 -30 - Reiter September 12, 1984 Page 2 11 J. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Area Specific Plan Permits a range of light manufacturing office and wholesale storage and distribution uses, and related support uses in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 5). The project site is located in the Haven Avenue Corridor Study area and is the subject of a separate report on tonight's agenda. !I. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project consists of four speculative industrial buildings that could be used for office or manufacturing uses. The applicant has indicated his intention to lease buildings 1 and 2 along Haven Avenue for office users. As the Commission will recall, the Industrial Specific Plan encourages development along Haven Avenue that will provide for a high quality character associated with "Office Park" type development in a campus -like setting. The applicant is proposing two low- profile office buildings (1 and 2) and two 2 -story profile "R & a° type buildings (3 and 4) with office and warehouse space. The applicant's intent_ is to transition from Haven Avenue to the larger scale warehouse /distribution buildings to :.he east. The proposed architectural concept indicates the use of tilt -up concrete buildings with exten�i•,e areas of solarized bronze glass and rounded concrete :ln walls together witli a heavy fluted texture, as shown in Exhibit "E B. Issues: The issues associated with this project for the 77anning Commission considerations are: 1. Does the proposed architecture reflect the high quality office image desired for haven Avenue? 2, Does the proposed site plan arrangement in terms of building placement. landscaped open areas, and Parking areas, create a campus -like setting that reflects a high quality office park image? C. Desi n Review _Committee: The Committee reviewed the proposed site plan and elevations for conformance with City policies encn.:raaing a high quality offic^ park image. The Committee was :.orcerned that the originally proposed site plan _r;angement did not create an office park setting and recommended that the applicant revise the site plan to pull buildings up to Haven Avenue with parking in the rear. in eddition, the Ccmmittee recommended that stronger focal points be provided at the intersecti,,ns and that an on -site pedestrian oriented open space areas '.e provides' . jn terms of 0-:;>, E L 'J rol PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment & DR 84 -30 - Reiter September 12, 1584 Page 3 architecture, the Committee expressed concern that the low profile buildings along Haven Avenue should be provided with raised buiiding pads to give greater architectural presence and that the buildings he provided wit:, offset setbacks to avoid a linear appearance aiong Haven Avenue. In response to the Committee's concerns regarding the Haver. Avenue Corridor issues the applicant has pre :pared a revised site plan, Exhibit "B ", that relocates buildings 1 and 2 up to Haven Avenue with parking in the rear. Further, a linear Pedestrian element is provided from Haven Avenue to the east to link all four buildings together and provide a landscaped open space with pedestrian - oriented amenities. The revised grading plan, Exhibit "D", indicates that the southwe t corner of both buildings 1 and 2 basicaily match the street grades. However, the majority of both buildings are 2 -4 feet lower than the street grade. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and determined that no signficiant environmental impact will occur as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Th-:s project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed site and building designs, together with the recommended Conditions, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: I` is recommended that consider all material and input en this consideration the Commission can support t Conditions of Approval, adoption of the issuance of a Negative Declaration would h e fCit om i RG:DC:ns bmitted, the Planning Commission loject. If after such Facts for Findings and a .tacked Resolution and appropriate. ft 03 1 i3 �Z t � 1 Y _ ZU 00 CIRCULATION 120' RAW- 100' 900' R.O.W. 88' or less; R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE T ' Existing Proposed TRAILS /ROUTES 0 0 0 o Pedestrian o • o 0 Bicycle IZIIZI Multi-Use -a^�^ Special Streetscape/ Landscaping Power Linei Utility Easement •••� -- Creeks & Channels Bridge 4 Access Points '[Park ©Fare Station �t y a CITY OF ITEM- RAINCHO CUCAMO\GA I .: PLVNNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- SCALE= � -s J i 0 o: .ice C F E � 1 w�o� iior w� �-[e.f• dui d�is.rwr i /sw• NCStT H CITY OF FEN I: R =�� "CIAO CUCA \TONGA PLANNING Mr SIGN EXHIBIT- SCALE: 0 -( -: 'zt a I (D Jlu 1. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXIONGA PLANNING-, DIVISION Lol cyl) I r.1 E E F, RAH 11111 1 111111.0 I i � wo�, AA,. I m OWN A 0,17 NORTH �JI 1 I .I i'I'lll I 1 lilli � - _� �� ' i•�� J 11 I Y I I Ia =� a it I - # °• I' L 41' I I �' r f i t lit a II b +' i- -. &`f r lay -- -1 - -'I Ta I I I � I/ KI•.x 4r EJT•W 1 I I C= e.t3TN f I I l..O/^Iv- NT GMIVw ti"wl C" RY d Cuws NOM CITY OF ITE\ I: =_ BL LNCI �O CUCATIIO, T, : PLANNING Dl-% 9ON EXHIBIT - SCALE_ c� N?i' 'lul m L'.1 �"�• —: I'RY!� .LCC �! ^_T�_2 SS'!�Li� -ta LC_L:�'S —_. J 7rl ra _ .t /ryRTI/ [/ EvF_]T�/v.T C_UY•_vP ..e '..4 +e -.•C u I uu�n J 7rl ra _ .t /ryRTI/ [/ EvF_]T�/v.T C_UY•_vP ..e '..4 +e -.•C MIS rty orf r T✓ E rt h..�._aL�t�r �a •_'EL_:2_ ® CITY Or ITEM: _ RANCE-�O C.,'CANIO\GA TITLE: � PLANINL \G DlNrNON EXHIMT: SCALE: •"� o-/ ...Y•t.0 � a.J /RY rt. _�O•vf P w•f fOt. n.4( V N,OIZ FH u uu�n Hall 11,11;Illulill NOR MIS rty orf r T✓ E rt h..�._aL�t�r �a •_'EL_:2_ ® CITY Or ITEM: _ RANCE-�O C.,'CANIO\GA TITLE: � PLANINL \G DlNrNON EXHIMT: SCALE: •"� o-/ ...Y•t.0 � a.J /RY rt. _�O•vf P w•f fOt. n.4( V N,OIZ FH u uu�n MIS rty orf r T✓ E rt h..�._aL�t�r �a •_'EL_:2_ ® CITY Or ITEM: _ RANCE-�O C.,'CANIO\GA TITLE: � PLANINL \G DlNrNON EXHIMT: SCALE: •"� o-/ ...Y•t.0 � a.J /RY rt. _�O•vf P w•f fOt. n.4( V N,OIZ FH C= OF RANCMO cua�-VO%GA Tl,?IT y1�aL S1L ✓ ✓� PART I - PR:)JB.T S=--'-:"- - To be co letec ry _ ac- '.can. Ez:v`0=ental Assessme: t Review Fee: S6 .0: - F'0= all arojects re=—; inc e=.r:L O- S2IIe=tp- .^eVleli, th4 s must be Completed and s1:b^..ttee to t ne Deveic -z—= Review CO=ittee ti,.raucn the depa_:.men-. wnere the project application is Made. 'loon - ecei"a of =nis .. . 1 repa=e ap_ - ication, the Envi-- =e=t nzlss s t aw =I:= Z• Tne I12V210DLie1� R.eti2e4• Co.r,,.ittee w_11 meet a ^.. tcKe•action no 1F-' =e= tna_ =en (10) days be=o=e the Pccl == meeti== at w ^= =e the p_O- - i5 to be heard. The Co— =ttee w. -_ make one of three dete-: 4ations: 1) ^ne =Zojec= wi11 nave no sic ^.ifi cant env- 4-c =ental i=pact a ^.d a Negative Dec_c_a =-;t wi^ Oe filed, 2) The Drojeci: wil. i have a Signifi cant environT>?ntai intact and an LnvironT'2ntal impact ReDort wiii be •^.re=ared, or 3) An additional i nfOrnati on reDor; should be S uD: ; i ed by the aDD i i cant civinc further infornation concerning the pronoseC prcjeCt. PROJECT T=-LB: HAVEN COMMERCM CENTER APPLT -GAI=T MUMM, ADDR —S , T :Tr.PIIOI� : A.H. Reiter Deveiooment Co. 3188 Pullman. Costa mesa, CA 92626 714/751 -45-94 I -M-1=, ADDRESS, Tt -PMXE OF P ??.SON :.7 BE COI,7, AC=— CONL.t.Rd YG T=—LS PROJ—ZL--r: Auayst: H Reiter, ITT 3188 Pullman, Costa Mesa, Ca 92626 714/751 -4594 ZUC >TIGI OF PRO=:,CT (S:H=.` ,A:)I)P :SS :mot. ASS'SSOR PA NEC 7th and Haven, Parcel No. 209 - 401 -13 T•, ST OTC R PSR?.tr•rS Iv�C :SS. :RY FROM ZRAL AGENCT1..S AND VZ — -G :Nf'Y iSSUTi�v, SU.^H ^ Z wT'ES: ZR. None L - Z —t 0—/6 PROjE = D= SC9I=TION DESCRIPTION OF ?ROTC Four buildings desianed for uses within the Industrial Sc_ecific Plan of Sub area 6. AC? AG OF PROJE ^• AREA AIM SQUARE 'FOC_AGI 0= D}MS_ING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: None D_ESCR1S- T=... =-%- �.1 +�. r+w�_� �_..rtrwrl.^ �- T«✓ mNc:L7a_NG I:v —L7 •., =v\ C:�'I AKZMA.LS, 1 ITY 0= C ASP" ^S, UJ.^... OF SURRO UXG OF • :y EX-- S7:'-17G STRUCTU-L.S AIND T —x j.:S weeds - relatively flat, all OT�ci �m+n +nom +G have been-installed- is tine project, pa--t of a larger project, one of a seris-�s ai cumulative a--- 0'.1s, lame: altho::c incividuallF small, ~ may as a whole have si=i =icaat env:ro=m --ntal -pact? No environmental imcact. V:ILL THIS PRCv LL�T C YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in �—ound X 2. Create a substantial noise or vibrztio:.. g_ 3. C_ea_e a .substantial municipal serv-ces sewage, etc.) ? change in existinc chance in de. -and fox police, dire, crater, ce ^era: pier. :resignations:' x 5. Reracve an_ exiszinq t =ees? How many, x b. Create the need f..= use o= d'_snnsa/ c= m_ _ials suc: as toxic substar_ces, =la.. gables or ex_tlosives? Explanatic. of anv a_ ^_swers al-ove c I_M_aJ -• ^_ If th e przje involves the const= ction of residential i- -ii =s, cc=- let'e the :o_:., on tae neat race. CERTL ICATION: I hereby ce =tify that the statements fu =nisi above and in the attar -hed exhibits p =esent the data and information recui =ed for this i^_itial evaluation to the best of ny ability, and that the facts, statements, and ii�0^IS?tiCn p =esen_ed are t--,;e and co =recce to the best of Tay kno:rledce and be7.ief. _ -tier ;:nde= stand�t:at additional i.Lor�-. =t ion may be requ-4 -ed to be subsisted before an adecuate evaulatic -n can be made by the Develczment Review Co-. aittee. A.H. REITER DEV7ELMSNT CO. Date Sicnatu ;e August H. Reiter, III Title T--5 0 -/z RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -30 LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND 7TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the :9th day of July, 1984, a complete application was filed by A. H. Reiter for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of September, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurinus to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration: is issued on September 12, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -30 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The open space, /pedestrian plaza between the buiidinas shall be designed as a pedestrian oriented focal point and include an integrated sidewalk system, plaza areas with seating and shade structures, drinking fountains, and extensive landscaping. 2. Extensive landscape treatment shall be provided at both Haven Avenue intersections to emphasize the architectural image of a high quality office park. � , o -/3 Resolution No. Page 2 3. Elevate the building pads for Buildings 1 and 2 to provide greater architectural image!profile along Haven Avenue. 4. A combination of landscaping and berms shall be provided within iaiidscape setback to screen parking and loading areas. Berms shall be undulating with an average height of three foot and a maximum slope not to exceed 3 1/2:1. 5. '_ands aping shall be provided along building elevations, within parking lots, and within the landscape setback in accordance with Industrial Area Specific Plan requirements. 6. Twenty percent (20 %) of the required parking spaces shall be compact i8' x 16' with proper signing to so designate as for "Compact Cars Only ". APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1984. PLA' -1 NG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Scout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held oz. the 12th day of September, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L Q -i/ 11 �I N u u V L ^ Tr .r L •n . fj doo �� d C O �Vr p•ry •I 9�0_ �y�Vi MCO'�VV OCO n L t� � d N C 1.jp� y ` .rT N9 �ti `)V OL'V_ an MLVO =` r O J � ~ gi p `OVOa ✓ ✓ 9 -•f OA <.�i+u't"'Q �N t_ GTV V 9•+Y_Y L V � °y _t OYCp L�'� U`O U•L C � O�G� 06 Fro LOCV � o T T o c c= C o N E - n G O V 'O q �.. `•.rru - O ra•Va � L- C.o .�..• o r r ✓ � _ E n o.�vr� O `. .)gyp VQ VMn r L ]•.. O V r G� n r :- G 1 C £ C V� V � � Ora ._ � p i V L N N �a0 �. VVC�9Jrr Vy ✓_C VrU C`? OnOC �UC Iu T_On s l °Jq� J �V '�- eu n.O.r 7 dL.+70'np cu V r1 cJ_ im C�V S] rrY'�J 9 V l! L✓ C• f q O C 3 l= c •� ' L V N . k V +r n✓ Oro u C r y q = l 0 "' ✓ O N 9 •) O 9 I qV r= ✓ r _ •" • Svf� V� -I c U r 4 :•d- o�a °�`_o¢y- G C p F u V 4 WCr °Oq .", ... >�_.'+ L vN`eJ oo q c•c_< W°"r -'� =c4� N r °PC Q�u V ` O � u o - ^.a. V °N'no ✓,.v =" TbrN < -:•� � r � ✓ V � O`N =V �_ O yC�O J'J rTjC L..,V.O.r u'TC �6�CC J4GC i _t ^ 9 N ✓ 6-m r_ L P- N S 7 I N Pr ° _ _ V n 1 o p 'J V�� J G C� V O L 9 r v O t r u NuOpr a 6 V A C T J •Ca T N`r�06 c'V✓ C C9 ✓� ^-L°V�O drrG 9> .T �' � ^..- _ TL mp �~ O -NC na`oca.. VV� A6 FS� O•y.r't c _; as .u.o ar.c � •o� �> m _ �a . cc a •_ •Fo Ww'c N PV'a ✓V G'V `Jr Tdu'u• CI +•d V'6 nVVt �u'� b �'`�CV ` „� i =`reno nom• �A z= _� �`addr ¢�°sD - -b =t `d` b - qvu� aN rS Oq m .a-cO° 6V pV y' 6L 0. T• tll NI N�I N �` C O C O O O V 1 1 I H a O O V 6 C O O V 0 c c r N V V m ~ y< r� C7 �� d C O �Vr p•ry •I V J t� � C y L.^ � 6. � °y G� �'e 4rnc v ENEb O ra•Va ”. OC 7 O `. .)gyp �a0 GEr Vi.ay �. l �V •¢J QGV Q I qV .�� rL „J • Svf� V� -I c U r 4 ' G C p F u V 4 q G V ` O V NN c• r � ✓ V � qG O ✓NC i _ N�� '`C. ` 7 pro✓ N O'O C ✓V !! _ V rl T• O. 9 r � C` N �` C O C O O O V - V OMr F 0'�J ✓N V � 6�� 6 G .9L U c 6+ k N NL• `N O E� � M r� �• � L f S V L ! C° c � L C G N u b TL d = O v P "._ _r_ .o — cam`. �— a__. - oy ✓_✓,d _ c 'pc ,C .°.� yi y.G TO Oar <�ry - N_ u. VS- LV••_ ° n� OGa ✓VO L C �Cl�c< V. 9l. � COyV dyFU L C <V L°•O > C.�CF nMO T�� Ys yE�M L LO _6 GCT uCC L �CGO` Lr0 ¢_ r O j a u ° F O_ � O t v C C V C C _ G b C.✓ q✓ r M`r •n00 O� CC' _ O>.e .... •L.'GU Ny C•nG gOML _T r. Yom'.• dyC CC 'C� N 4C�Gy i iiCO <~ l�C`^ _ y L'? la GpV Gtr u` ySN =Ny ¢nVr V C<• <90 CN M NE- - •O V •n L r> V U G.. C y- C r� N C P L L f O y� L_L �uJL c•%,p n °.`. _v�_.c �.� od: LcO ° ^ca ..°. bu`� > ._ T� O fJ S G. r i _ ^ C > C F_ �. ✓ d C -- •4 C O L r. < ✓ d r. V - L � E C Y � _GL n =r C C � �' L' ._ � � _ n • t,/ � U _^ u i� c r c __�° E4 °�. L c -GY c °^ t - c' °L• Gz � y✓ 4 C> E O- N r C U C l L° ° S u ✓ t.. O L - y„ u - r r q C V ✓ r r - y u N N N N O N N L r l r Tt LO LOGP LCO -_c NCC �. O. i. �•�C. p �_ Cr Trj � � `EON Pgc•C r•C -y C• -V � PCL VL >NS• GOy>00 ICUP. uMJ •_HO G�m� to .es -` CN✓a•C Ly <cc 69 y.°n Gt°i Or°iG � q� f N L N r. � Q S 6 •4 C' r/ 1 C n \ P = 6 El 6 < C- Fvc. L- < rCL ay aCN a0i lac GV9 �' T N ocN = Gc 44 ~ — —•,� p< car � c.t„ NG•� '�= — °a =� — cr c.L..'o�D�c _ _ o _ r LL..r ra LQ •2 ^ -_ y L V_ ✓. d � G T O � y� <V C p L. o :.rte ✓ �° 6 O¢ L N O P Lcr C [L. tom+• q Vim _.[n -� L`n d� CO` LL O•GyM .e �GG�NL! tCG n_J y.l CGS^ < Z Ev G � b C G `^ L _. C< '� C. r 0 n C L u� ✓ >� .J r N � C C '•� J V ay G G _>r> L G cam: oN < o�c ci L =C J° G �_ E TE> Ei _= e Oc�Cb- Nr� C =.[.L UT v GY LG oVV Vj .N..�mE GCL iFT Gn LL C_yL `rC `C`rL -L � -�OC ACLV _uC n q C y ✓_ O '� t C C N 7 i t= C_ N '� Y r P> -_E oDY -Fi_ __'.' cf- c C yr• T = c•>NG •^ C.._ _ y q = C V N F �CCr L G' ✓ � .°. m C F V D ^.- 6 V u G V i y � NON �n� y.VC GC oG c• LGd Wiy NTJN ✓'CT _. -�✓r O~✓ -•.rN^ ° iVN' -'9 �� .� inn r� 'Z EOw tea^ ^ °OC Nei= c.:;�o N _or =s' c+•oG cr °,.n ¢.. a °Nb Z2 "�^ c= V; G'O� zo =eo ° =° °• 'o�t�i Y r _ ,L_� C✓ u. M V ✓ _E °off -°qrn` Vy t. _ V O y n S i �.- t O •n ✓ - v�� L G F_ -v •a N_ C_ LLV`✓_ � C V CCU+- C yl `� •C uCG• V ,r -•Or °CL.L VCCyVy V C�G` �O 9 Oqu Y °C V_O_Od ^� LC <Q �q`O y O j _qL N °�'JC y =^NT :..p Fd w w ✓ .'a ° 9qV S� •w O 4 V> 0 ✓ f. .U.. C N C< C - <LV'G �� G d y -✓ r u ✓ y L y = v �_ `� ^ C C - O Y Y d � d __ -J C <. C M C � •Gr9 •_ J L C O� C u J O d `• L n� �� r n Pa L L ° q O i b G� r O y V L U M O c C ¢ _ V c N .__ t°i C 9•�.Vr.o�i � _ n L f G u O r L O y. C Y L C T• V F L EF' � °� sydu° VI c�hwo°i�° c =Er VC -c�� r -d - O y V �• � L f S V L ! C° c � L C G N u b TL d = O v P "._ _r_ .o — cam`. �— a__. - oy ✓_✓,d _ c 'pc ,C .°.� yi y.G TO Oar <�ry - N_ u. VS- LV••_ ° n� OGa ✓VO L C �Cl�c< V. 9l. � COyV dyFU L C <V L°•O > C.�CF nMO T�� Ys yE�M L LO _6 GCT uCC L �CGO` Lr0 ¢_ r O j a u ° F O_ � O t v C C V C C _ G b C.✓ q✓ r M`r •n00 O� CC' _ O>.e .... •L.'GU Ny C•nG gOML _T r. Yom'.• dyC CC 'C� N 4C�Gy i iiCO <~ l�C`^ _ y L'? la GpV Gtr u` ySN =Ny ¢nVr V C<• <90 CN M NE- - •O V •n L r> V U G.. C y- C r� N C P L L f O y� L_L �uJL c•%,p n °.`. _v�_.c �.� od: LcO ° ^ca ..°. bu`� > ._ T� O fJ S G. r i _ ^ C > C F_ �. ✓ d C -- •4 C O L r. < ✓ d r. V - L � E C Y � _GL n =r C C � �' L' ._ � � _ n • t,/ � U _^ u i� c r c __�° E4 °�. L c -GY c °^ t - c' °L• Gz � y✓ 4 C> E O- N r C U C l L° ° S u ✓ t.. O L - y„ u - r r q C V ✓ r r - y u N N N N O N N L r l r Tt LO LOGP LCO -_c NCC �. O. i. �•�C. p �_ Cr Trj � � `EON Pgc•C r•C -y C• -V � PCL VL >NS• GOy>00 ICUP. uMJ •_HO G�m� to .es -` CN✓a•C Ly <cc 69 y.°n Gt°i Or°iG � q� f N L N r. � Q S 6 •4 C' r/ 1 C n \ P = 6 El 6 f C.Vi�V^ c_ FLU<cLr �.--pd c u UOV NO mo �C Oron �' .r p ^ -7 •-' 1Y y ^LJ✓ D�V LcS v' � c.°,m q..r " c' °v M'nL � �.co _ -.. ✓ o'c u, .G. y _°. .i E L ✓ q t •O V q L V✓ V~ O y „ V ° O - y r d -GU C u_ 0 D✓ V= Y D q Y= n S q 0 U V q C 7 N C V U q 40. G. � q_ -..V.• O� N= 9 C✓ ."r C = q l C 6 G ' d C N 4 N p � � 9F VrLgVr d` yr� O O>•� ^J ✓ N rL..o L - P -✓ G-' _ _ �r ✓c _ca .°ut� 2 NYC N � 4' L C' V L�' p <r � O a w ✓� V r w 9 Q i S 9� E p� V r C <O _ N �CO�Oa rgVP 9 C �PD✓r =Y.�� pr - V qO l Q�C O L Cr =�✓ o _ Vt ✓ .-. ✓ S P Nr.6� r C.. -.ql✓ „�W � � r✓✓✓ NOy�q -^ �- v - V q - C O Cr p L l V 9^ c V V d w < ✓'^ l O P .°+ G n 6 N Q V� Y Vr V C G T c O 6 6 V �r O g n N r � ^✓ L T O q! q T N D r v°i .n q \yIO O \,z \ q'I - \T1 1 o� ad � - Qao rnoE oa•L� oqo co c _ .°oc N °Y VC rnrV✓ r dpi O._ g C O; LO nG <L ��O V LOL9q C✓ q` 9 �� .. �L. = r ✓lC aV. Vr•'r�° L C C L2 ^✓ j P° roe. _V M q d ��O'O^ N -sr0.' rV..2 qr fe� ✓y._ �q v-.O d Ndg9 Cn OO�q° V.VOL VVP >C _ ..rF -.. -i.�f <`✓ -cQ:N C� C P �9VL q an o .n✓ N °.a 'y � Cn V6 �I � ” - ° Pao VLyr6� z c c � c qF Nd✓ ✓ = _qO-� L � q m ✓� rcc� c d gGGN Pq P ddT m -NrG •� a q c� ENO c L .� >.d i HN^ LL- 00 aG -• 4CM VI OC.._.^ ` Vr FTr _ _ q ✓UP �I .C. ..� VL .�...L E>LU c'V O. __NV _ _S• V!>.N qV` PVC UCL �.Nir -�V N CP =N �r r V U U - rnVP �q0 _� L O N r� C r �^ L ^• L O L ✓i d G� ,e .L. PO � .Ca ✓`V V .L.urJ�✓ V I ` L ^ V' a C c = C q V r V '� O L L C i L ia• d �r .. q�OOV q L T 9 j= t Or 'I ° C� r L J L• ` -` CVC.`.• t O - '- � O V r d `� q C C N C L .r.yN V G ^ ^9N � v � JrV 9.'+O6 Nc y_a NV'.N ✓l v =6 LyC u•drr V'J L --GS - O ^= `LN OG -^ i� c <M <v c9 n •¢rsq ...oNOGx .n qN cN+ x'v.o �rrrz -`o 0-/7 0 en r: �\\1 V+ r,t 0 V d 7 O i d Ll C' 11 tn.- C C — e• S _ S +J F qC Li✓1� LI �u. —O rrn` _V \4 C d q.nNN LEI O LV VH .n n.qp W __ = ✓_ ` u V F_i� -L 6G il�.G_ a j^ .°gN.JO qV J� •' L' —�O L P.GON - C -r V Ina =- G�� =ocZ r 7 V = G N 4 q • V 2.. v S S r. q O y �L.n LN4E� Lr me Yit N4 � °� ^tiWL i °�iur vc_oq o_,' ..? _nu v4 °o =•'� 76a1rN 6r.:j N q•_ .°..� i.TI � W W V .. _I d -' ti cr • q _ Oq C �c+yV iGLa NV .1[ a -.- aGin l� C rn Q C_�N qy. r_JC V • i uFF• I N. - r- vr° rG c• t-co 111111 - _ t Pq_ N a r z: L e-� a•ep tv r u0 cq wr` o.w< �I)1m• cqq i� LLOa r W Cc i i Ll C' 11 to ° ° `� r� �.., 7g 7 J ^ E c n i c V � �• C t r �f O t � `� c u e7Z Q j 1 L T r V d� � d v � = � �� • `V" h� �t y 0 °� c•° °N .Q — � �n a r.. v�nc u o P L =° V✓ = F 1 V� ' r • .s .� r Y` G'Ya� M dVl u `JLjr O ' n < N �O �i \• O P � 'I I L' al o°4rn— L°oo qo =�or r>=r is L d o g^ Q L V_ DcCS `O yr G C O - -y N' V 2- cam CL�C NL.`yS LOT `C ^= O n C PAC NL °e Vpr r y.+ pC _ 9E ,4i, �° u S-Z V. ^ 2 O t `� .nar q T LLL nr _V..r dpLr LP _moo PE tM 9GP >O dV ?f�Ojl LC °.p C ^ lj � r �L TROD q I F 2.g '-' ° a r o -� .� :.. E L �. .. L L P ac..• ^ O O V L .n D r G = U G 6 e G M y Y rO.n 'Z 2 OO' �� V nivT> TSC V�+1 NOSnr V•JN� 4 G Cpr E ^t — M a rCJV QOV VO P9 O� >I 9T O' �I 1 u to Y V (L 0 i a. U. e I O O O O L C T F L U c`• _o i:�r r L p= r- J ` Y LL O �dN u ' 6 G F 4C -O. r NS V N a V L 7:5 o 0 G C L C t Gy C O Cy ya ° G L r J rl G r r > 4 Y .z4S N Orr r L N O - j O T „ •., p �1 N c I =I C G 1 v` L - i C N � V N q d � ' L � �» C N` y p V.. C T . S .-r. ✓ C = C Y L C = c � _• oI 1 Cry C �L -4C � •^ rn C � d Ny �C r CC l yA I T rn.0+ r Y T V3 a CV r 1 6 CO =C = LT I TO ud l nG .- u T -= - _V ... l r U r tl u. ✓ N n y r� O _ C U I P -.Tr b L j q O C l C L _ L L ..G fi C C d T G O cc •oGO a J I -oq E o n _ `9 c. > CCLL .rL o2�YO a •O �L a -q� -� io c Z C V 's- O= V O •0.. C CVy �y OJ d ONV Tr �VJJT SN V� TL ` � pC0 Y`i -.T.. -- O L�.r✓ �pGb, C LLI - d pp lVE 7 y` - G O _I r•J I q �� <6N 9 J 2 O e I O O O O L C T F L U c`• _o i:�r r L p= r- J ` L LL O �dN u ' 6 G F 4C -O. r NS V N a V L 7:5 G C L C t Gy C O Cy ya ° G L r J rl G r r > 4 Y .z4S N Orr r L N O - j O T „ •., p �1 N c I =I C G 1 v` L - i C � V � C e I O O O O L C T F L U c`• _o i:�r r L p= r- J ` L LL O �dN u ' 6 G F 4C -O. r NS V N a V L 7:5 G C L C t Gy C O Cy ya ° G L r J rl G r r > 4 Y .z4S N Orr r L N O - j O T „ •., p �1 N c I C G 1 v` L - i C � V � C C = C Y L C = c _• oI 1 Cry C �L � •^ rn C � L Y < v C a I r Y T r 1 6 = e I O O O O L T F c`• _o i:�r r L p= r- J C CC LL O �dN u ' 6 G F 4C -O. r NS N a V L 7:5 G C L C t Gy C O Cy ya ° O r J rl G r r > 4 Y .z4S N Orr r L N O j O T „ •., p �1 � - C V C Y L C = _• 1 r �L � •^ rn C � L a I r Y T 6 e I \� P �G -a � 11 O O O O L T F c`• _o i:�r r L p= r- J C CC LL O �dN u G F 4C -O. r NS N a V L 7:5 G C L C t Gy C O Cy ya ° O r J rl G r r > 4 Y .z4S N Orr r L N O \� P �G -a � 11 V y U U O L d u L nl OI c_r u" I � cCi G V 6q Vr I o S N Ll Per q q C I -L` N O r O q y C S I I G V N — VC O G ay. rr — I P - V I q` I�qC � I TC CU nl OI c_r d o Y G � cCi G V 6q Vr I o S N Ll Per q q C V N O r O q y C p — VC O G ay. rr V q` I�qC � I TC CU I IQ d\ I I Vn TW r�C O-C. O- _ INr2 �r G ON_ N l I Cr Mr 0 0 P 7 EJ C • N q. c� dY D S C! q O V d � P �q x� r J JC I — P c L O a i V �T � J a G C d `o - q l a c G d ^ V u_u O r > V r O � ni .•u _ O r q d �n NE OIJ c oc N � C J` ` 4J ^ c D `u c� - T v. NC �yq d q C G 5 N va o� V T '0 6 E E ^ L E � d r — u q O v E 4 l O � � V � � T ?aE M C r ,N o c a c f C V l j d < G N o -:�I JO k, FM Planning Commission Meeting of q zt Z 140- RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN -UP SHEET While not a requirement., it wv,zld be appreciated if you would sign your name and address to th:s form for inclusion in the .Minutes of this meeting. NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM 2. A /i 7. Q! S; ?:>g� AAA 1156 k?. Mwoko A. S. 9. ItIp 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. — 29. — — 30. _ —