No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/10/24 - Agenda PacketM D m cI) z �c v D r a � 3 9 A 1 m 'v --i r D i Z 2 Q N �Q Q r'� C rY OF RANCHO CUCAMO \GA PLAINNLNG c0,�/li\/lissD ,NT AGENDA WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 24, 1984 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LENS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUWORNIA A C T I O N L Pledge of Allegiance EL Roll Call Commissioner Barker X Commissioner ChitieaX Commissioner McNie1X Ir F, IV. Ar ^PROVED AS AVEMED 4 -0 -0 -I APPROVED-5-0 V. Approval of Wmutes September 12, 1984 September 26, 1984 >,.. Commissioner Rempel X _ Commissioner Stout X The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- cantroversiai. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it shouai be removed for discussion. APPROVED 5 -0 A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-24 - HANRICH - The development of a 13,000 square foot warehouse-of ice addition on 12 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) category located at 11266 Jersey Boulevard, west of Milliken Avenue - APN 209 - 142 -03. 0 --- awa,. ✓L•z.YVriw:ai�1 vV111r[ln& — Azle development o a 349710 square oot ind:- trialJwarehouse building on 1.63 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 10) located at the northwest corner of 7th Street and Toronto - APN 209 - 401 -08. CONSENT CALENDAR,CONTD.C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT Approved 5 -O REVIEW 84-37 - FORHAN - The development o a 2 -story industrial building totaling 65,256 square feet on 5.33 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 14) category located at the end of Hyssop Drive, east of the Devore Freeway - APN 229 - 283 -60. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR - 'rne oevetooment of a square foot industrial warehouse building on 3.09 acres of land in the industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located at the southwest corner of 7th Street and Utica - APN 209 -411 -3 and 4. E. TENTATIVE TRACT 11928 - DAVIS - Design revisions to an approved tract, the Highland Villas project, to be located on Highland Avenue, near Ramona Avenue. F. TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - Reapplication for Design Review of site plan and architectural changes for 121 condominiums on 6.1 acres of land, located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill. G. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-32 - BARMAKIAN - Planning Commission review of building elevations. VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by sating your name and address. All such opinions shall be Iimi, :d to 5 minutes per individual for each project. APPROVED 4 -0 -0 -1 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE Barker Abstained) PERMIT 84-22 - HIGHLAND COMMUNITY COVENANT with deletion of CHURCH - The proposed master plan or the development o Planning Division lti- a 6400 square foot church and two multi-purpose accessory Condition #5. buildings on 3.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 du/ac) located at the southwest corner of Carnelian and Highland - APN 201 - 214 -08. APPROVED 4 -0 -0 -1 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8785 - (Barker Abstained) HIGHLAND COMMUNIT Y COVENANT CHURCH - A division of 7.7 acres into 2 parcels in the Low 2-4 ac Residential Development District located on the south side of Highland, between Carnelian Avenue and Jasper Avenue - APN 201- 214-08. APPROVED 5 -0 J. with amendments to Standard Conditions. APPROVED 3 -2 With removal wind- K' rows & replacement with appropriate variety & changes to Opal and 14andarin street designs. L. L. COM41SSION PROVIDED FURTHER DIRECTION TO STAFF ON DRAFT ORDINANCE. CONTINUED TO 11 -14 -84 M. 5 -0 CONTINUED TO 11 -14 -84 N. 5 -0 CONTINUED TO 11 -14 -84 5 -0 8578- a:.aa aav•uwane. A yVtill"O %.L — h ULVLb1Un oL 131.02 acres into 14 parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial area (Subarea 9) located on the south side of Arrow Route, east and west of Milliken Avenue - APN 229 - 111 -23. szaoa - unzu c ttni x - A residenuai subdivision of 96 lots on 32.3 acres of land in the Low Residential (2-4 dulae) District located at the southeast corner of Banyan and Carnelian - APN 1062- 361 -01; 1062 - 371 -01. MENT W v liwLn a 1. W L nLV L — rLLUCLUig %,ommission review oI public comments and recommendations the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue, between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. a,1u LLU�,L - m uenerai rLan amendment trom Office to Industrial Park for approximately 46 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208 - 341 -01. ii uevelopment Liswict Amendment from OP (Office/Professional) to ISP (Industrial Specific Plan) for approximately 40 L.eres of land located on the west side cf Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208- 341-OL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIPL SPECIFIC PLAN AMBNnMFNT Ad-nt - RAVFN AVVMTTu v a.asa�n a vau L nab, L — nu ainenument to me inaustrial Specific Plan to expand the boundary of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208- 341-01. VII.. New Business APPROVED 5 -0 P. APPROVED 5 -0 Q, with amendments to Resolution regarding finished floor area and retaining wail. xZVLr,Vr e4--411 - xvnnt;t t - me aeveiopnsert oz a z-Stor; office building totaling 4,340 square feet can 0.5 acres of land in the Office Professional District, generally located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of Basle Line Road - APN 208 - 431 -29. of two manufacturing buildings totaling 41,245 net sq. ft. on 2.26 acres of land located in the General industria/Rail Served District (Subarea 10) generally located at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Milliken Avenue - APN 229- 261 -70. VWL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to to discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. 11 :50 p.m. UL A40uument The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. '• aTY OF a RANTMO CUC iMO_ NGA VzLlur''�TNL G Ca"WvIISSION z f GENDA 1977 WEDNESDAY QCTOBER 24, 1984 7:00 p.m. IIONS PARK C MMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNI6 II. 3Q11 Cali Commissioner Barker Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel- III. AnNnIneements< IV. ARxvval of Minutes September 12, 1984 September 26, 198 V. Ca sent Caladfti� Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The following Consent Ca?endar items are expected to be routine and non- controverstaL They will be acted on by t;ia Commission at one time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be rem-ved ° ^r disruss ?on. C ,.. REVIEW F4-Z4 - HANRICH - The development of a 13,000 square a_c ware.hce addition on 12 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) category located at 11266 3er�ey Boulevard, west of Milliken Avenue - APN 209- 142.03. building on 1.63 acres of lend in the General Industrial cat*gory (Subarea 10) located at the northwest corner of 7th Stre_t and Toronto - APN 209401 -08. X. li V C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-37 - FORHAN - The development of a 2 -story industrial building totaling 65,256 square feet on 5.33 acres of land in the CP.nerai Industrial (Subarea 14) category located at the end of Hyssop Drive, east of the Devore Freeway - APN 229 - 283 -60. D. REviE W a4-sii - kuti m - 'i-ne oevelopment of a ba,uuu square foot industrisl/warehouse building on 3.09 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located at the southwest corner of 7th Street and Utica - APN 209 -411 -3 and 4. E. TENTATIVE TRACT 11528 - DAVIS-- Design revisions to an approved tract, the Highland Villas project, to be located on Highland Avenue, near Ramona Avenue. F. TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - Reapplication for Design Review of site and architectural changes for 121 condominiums on 6.1 acres of land, located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill. G. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-32 - BARMAKIAN - Planning Commission review aV, building elevations. .. The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. H. unuasc.L% - ine proposes master pan, scar ule aevexoprnenL UL e. 64CO square foot church and two multi- purpose accessory buildings on 3.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 du/ac) located at the southwest earner of Carnelian and Highland - APN 201 - 214 -08. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8785 - HIGHLAND COMMUN -IM COVENANT CHURCH -A division 0 7.7 acres into 2 parcels in the Low (2-4 du/ac) Residential Development District located on the south side of Highland, between Carnelian Avenue and Jasper Avenue - APN 201- 214-08. L J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8578 - SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY - A division of 131.02 acres into 14 parcels ui the Min mum Impact Heavy Industrial area (Subarea 9) located on the south side of Arrow Route, east and west of Milliken Avenue - APN 229 - 111-23. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12801 - DEER MEEK - A residential subdLvision of 96 lo:,s on 32.3 acres of land in t Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) District located at the southeast corner of Banyan and Carnelian - APN 1062- 361 -01; 1062 - 371 -01. L_ M. N. O. vvnai.al LJL7LLLLL.1 - rLammng a.ommia3evn review of puouc comments and recommendations the Interim Development Policies for Haven Avenue, between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. AND um t nl, i - rl uenerai Tian Amenamem crom voice to industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208 - 341 -01. LL'I L=%,I - H LOWWA -opmem ijibuun tuawnumenT Lrom 'Jr O ice /Professional) to LSP (Industrial Specific Plan) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the wrest side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -019 12, 13, and 208 -341 -0L Arr.(iLPLI.- rij iLN ADihNgmt;rc ' a4-uL - nAvWN AvhNI'r; OVERLAY DW CT - An amendment to the Industri ei Specific Plan to expand the boundary of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -011 129 13 and 208- 341-01. a j VIL New Businew P. 16svian ok-w4 - rurmua,ur - -ine oeveiopment of a 2 -story office building totaling 4,340 square feet on 0.5 acres of land in the Office Professional District, generally located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN 203 - 431 -29. Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT navinvv o-s- -JO - vuvtrrnl:i,Llutuvntirn - me aeveiopment of two man acturing buildings totaling 41,245 net sq. ft. on 2.26 acres of land located in the General Industria/Rail Served District (Subarea 10) generally located at the northeast corner of 7th Street wid Milliken Avenue - APN 229- 261 -70. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IX. Adjournment The 2>lanning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. N o, 1 �6_ 0 OwlAYro MT94MAnaw.a AM"Pr r. • F • F • f M I N U T E S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 12, 1984 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, held at the Lions Park Community Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, was called to order by Chairman Stout at 7 p.m. He tLen led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: STAFF "EMBERS PRESENT: ANNOUNCEMENTS David Barker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, Dennis Stout He.-man Rempel Dan Coleman, Associate Planner; Linda Daniels, Associate Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward A. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Curt Johnston, Associate Planner; Joan. Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Paul Rogeau, Senior Civil Engineer City Planner, Rick Gomez, advises there would be a tour of Rancho Cucamonga for the Commissioners on September 29 that would begin at 8:30 a.m. The group will return at noon for lunch and discussion critique of what has been viewed. Mr. Gomez advises that the Bentsen appeal to the City Council has been returned to staff for preparation of an additional traffic analysis relative to capacity and density of the site. Chairman Stout asks that alternatives to all traffic going out Lemon and dumping on Haven be examined; the elimination of Bentsen's mitigation measure of a temporary solution on a second method of egress southward; and exploring the possibility of continuing Lemon past Day Creek with the thought that permanent solution towards the south be found. Mr. Gomez advises that R. J. Investments has withdrawn its appeal to the City Council and has submitted a new site plan for the apartment_ proposal at Baker south of Foothill which will be a townhouse proposal similar to Acacia with a lower density. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Chittiea requested that the minutes of August 8, 1984 be corrected to show meandering sidewalks in front of the Christmas House, Item 8, Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 84 -15 - IlslRy and Toews. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to a,7prove the Minutes of the August 8, 1984 meeting ds corrected. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Barker requests that Item D be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Chairman Stout requests that item F be removed frcm the Consent Calendar and discussed under Director Reports later in the agenda. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to adopt Items A, B, C, E and G of the Consent Calendar. A. TIME - LOCatea on the south side of bth Stre iken Avenues - APN 210 - 082 -6, 28, 29, 30. eve B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAPS 6962 - KEY - Located on the north side Vicara Drive at Jasper Street - AP T561- 141 -06. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10210 - FORECAST MORTGAGE CORPORATION - A custom lot residential subdivision of 46 acres 'into _ 7 37 lots in the Hillside Residential District, generally located on the north side of Almond, between Sapphire and Turquoise - APN 200- 061-12, 200- 051 - 06,07, 1061 - 172- ^3. E. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACTS 11625 AND 11781 - DALY - Reapplication for Design Review of architectural changes for condaniniums on 13.7 acres of land located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa. G. GRADING MODIFICATIONS TO TRACT 12238 - CITATION BUILDERS Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 12, 1984 D. TIME TENT subdivis,on of L+ rocs District, located south APN 201- 251 -63 & 64. ATIVE TRACT 10076 - LIGHTNER - A residential .on acres of land in the Low Residential of Banyon Street, east of Archibald Avenue - Commissioner Barker requested clarification that Banyan would be brought up and continued. Following discussion it was determined that Banyan would be continued and that the applicant would be notified that a General Plan amendment is not contemplated; Mandarin does not exist as a street; therefore, a temporary cul -de -sac is unnecessary. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to adept Resolution No. 82 -SIA approving a time extension for Tentative Tract 10076. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. ENVIRONMENTAL A division Residential and northwest corner .E acres of land into 3 parcels in the 0/P (Office /Professional) districts of Haven Avenue and Arrow Highway - AFN Raul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviews the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. AMUSEMENT - A H Me ium High) located on the 208 - 344 - 01,04. Mr. Richard Avent, 930 Redding Way, Upland, representing Sero Amusement, states his concurrence with the staff report and advises he would answer any questions. He further states his agreement to the requirement for a master plan for this site. Mr. John Fehn, vic president of Lincoln Properties, 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Los Angeles, states his agreement with all conditions of the parcei map with the exception of items 11 and 12 which need clarification. Following Mr. Rougeau's explanation of item 11, the applicant states agreement and asks that item 12, requirement for a master plan, parcels 2 and 3,be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to their development. Further, that item 2 refer!ncing a lien agreement be amended to provide subordination by the City in oroir for them to obtain a construction loan. Following discussion and clarification of the subordination agreement to be included in the lien agreement and development of a master plan for this parcel, it is moved by Barker, seconded by Chitiea, carried unanimously, to Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 12, 1984 adopt Resolution No. 84 -93, with the addition of Section 4 to rescind the previous map and replace it with this map and an addition to condition 11 that otherwise all mrefer map requirements in these conditions r only to the parcel being developed. i. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12621 - RICHWOOD - A residential development o townhouse units on . acres o and in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du /ac) located on the south side of Arrow between Madrune and Baker - APN 207 - 261 -97. Chairman Stout states a letter has been received from the applicant indicating the owner's withdrawal of his objections to this project. Mr. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, advises that if the property owner has withdrawn his objections, the Commission could proceed with the hearing. Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviews the staff report. Chairman Stout opens the public hearing. Mr. Chris Adams, 304 Mar Vista, Pasadena, CA indicates he has reviewed the conditions of approval and can comply but asked for modification to Condition No. 18 to allow installation of a concrete ribbon drain that would be built to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Mr. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, replies that accommodations can be made and yet insure that the City's concerns are met. There being no further comments, the public hearing is closed. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Chitiea, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -94, approving Tentative Tract 12621, issuing a negative declaration with modification to Condition No. 18 to allow a concrete ribbon drain. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE T The development of singe family etas in the Low- Medium residential District between Ramona and Turner, approximately APN 1077- 032- 1,2,3,4. :CT 12772- MORRIS & SEARLES - cuses on acres o and 4 -8 du /ac) generally located .000 feet south of Baseline - Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 12, 1984 Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviews the staff report. He advises that a letter in opposition to the project has been received; however, it does no': point out anything specific. Chairman Stout opens the public hearing. The applicant states he has no objections to the conditions of approval. Mrs. Rose Ann Covman, 7494 Turner asks if there will be any type of retaining wall on the back of these homes. Mr. Coleman replies there are none indicated on the grading plan. Mr. Jim Cayman, a resident on Turner raises concerns regarding drainage and asks applicant if there will be a partitioning of property between existing homes and new homes. Applicant replies they will probably construct a wood fence, although that is not a condition, and asks if owner would like to share in its cost. Applicant indicates that is an offer. Mr. Coyman replies with concern that a wood Fence will not hold up. Mr. Richard Black, Ramona Street resident, asks if parcels are owned by same person. Mr. Coleman replies that they are. There being no further comments, `=he public hearing is closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -95 approving Tentative Tract 12772. with the issuance of a negative declaration. K. ENVIRUNMENTAL ASStSSMtNO A74U ULINUIiLIM- uZ,c rLKI --'f oa -ru - race: SPANISH ASSEMKY OF GOD CHURCH - The development of 24,475 square foot church facility and a request to operate a preschool on 4.29 acres of land in the Low Residential district (2 -4 du /ac) located on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Calaveras and Sierra Madre Avenue - APN 207 - 342 -12. Planning Commission Minutes -5- 1. September 12, 1984 Linda Daniels, Associate Planner, reviews the staff report. Rick Gomez, City Planner, states that one verbal comment has been received at the City Planning Counter in opposition to the project. Chairman Stout opens the public hearing. Mr. K. Nakana, architectural firm representing the applicant, expresses concern with the requirement for fencing just discussed by the Commission. He indicates that his meetings with Design Review have resulted in a better project. Following clarification that small children cannot be dropped off at preschool, the public hearing is closed. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt with modification requiring fencing in compliance with State law, Resolution No. 84 -96/, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -20 with issuance of a negative declaration. 8:15 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:30 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. L. ENVIRONMEi,TAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12726 - A -M COMPANY - A residential subdivision o lots on approximately T.28 acres in the Low Medium Development District (4 -8 du /ac) located west of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street - APN 202 - 032 -22 and 25. M. ENVIRONEMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12727- A -M COMPANY - A residential subdivision creating 21 single family residential Tots and one open space lot already developed, on 2.6 acres in the Low Medium Development District, located west of Beryl Avenue and south of Hamilton Street - APN 202 - 032 -69, 70 and 71. Linda Daniels, Associate Planner, reviews the staff reports. Commissioner Barker asks how tracts 12414, 12726 and 12727 can be legally bound together so that conditions imposed on one tract can be placed upon another. Planning Commission Minutes -6- September 12, 1984 a• Mr. Hopson explains the procedure of annexation into a homeowners association that would satisfy the Commission's concerns for adherence to conditions of approval. Chairman Stout opens the public hearing. Mr. Gary Mitchell, resident of Hamilton Ranch, advises that the conditions of approval are acceptable to his client. Mr. John Sauer, representing the A -M Company, advises that they have prepared a document for the annexation into the homeowners association in compliance with the State Department of Land and Real Estate. Mr. Bill Blanchard, 8890 Avalon, owner of lot 28, speaking for some residents, asks for density transition and a buffer zone; vehicle access to eliminate traffic congestion; fencing and the elimination of a proposed no man's land between existing and proposed tracts and reduction of two story houses so they do not look into existing homes. Michael Vairin, 6981 Opal, expresses concern with lack of transition and non- conformity to General Plan and City Codes. Others who spoke regarding increased traffic and inability to get out on Avalon Street, limited space on driveways that could hamper parking, grading, placement of a retaining wall and turning radius were: Richard Penny, 8811 Avalon G. T. Williams, 8821 Avalon Karen Osmondsen, 8850 Avalon Mr. Gary Mitchell explains their planning and design concepts. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker expresses concern with private streets bordering public streets; and overall design as far as total area and access to Beryl without putting Avalon through permanently. Commissioner McNiei cites problems with access discussed during Design Review and states that there must be secondary access. He indicates he was inclined to leave Avalon as the secondary access but it invites problems later on if that is done. Commissioner Chitiea suggests removal of lot 20 to give more space to lot 19 which would help in providing access. Planning Commission Minutes -7- September 12, 1984 Linda Daniels replies this cannot be done because it is necessary to connect an existing water line at this location.. Chairman. Stout states that the transition of density is one of degree rather than one of philosophy and cites the difference between a large apartment complex next to single family homes as opposed to single family homes next to single family homes. On the issue of circulation on Avaion, Chairman Stout states that secondary access must be provided in the event of accidents or flooding. Motion: Moved by Barker that the proposed site Tract 12726, be annexed to the current tracts; given that part of the proposal is that Avalon be turned into a cul -de -sac, lot 20 be eliminated; using the alternate plan distributed by the developer that fire and public utility easements be put through to Avalon cul-de -sac and designed for pedestrian access; north /south street be moved slightly to the east; advantage of the house placement be taken and Avalon access be designed into some park like structure that would allow children to walk throuah. Commissioner Chitiea seconded the motion. Commissioner McNiel and Chairman Stout dissented and the motion failed. Following further discussion, it is moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, carried to adopt Resolution No. 84 -97, approving Tentative Tract 12726 with modification to conditions that Avalon be a connecter that ties the two tracts together; the existing homeowners association annex the twe new tracts; elimination of one lot along the west edge to provide an additional 250 square feet per lot; and the issuance of a negative declaration. Commissioner Barker dissented. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel carried to adopt Resolution No. 84 -98 approving Tentative Tract 12727 with issuance of a negative declaration. N. HAVEN AVENUE STUDY Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, reviews the staff report and resolution. Chairman Stout advises the resolution will have interim standards until the overlay district is in effect and will not have the same force and effect of an ordinance. Planning Commission Minutes -8- September 12, 1984 Chairman Stout asks for input. Mr. James Barton, 552 Canistel, Rancho Cucamonga, asks what the second s-ntence in No. 1 of Section 8 in the Resolution means as he felt tilt -up buildings could be done in such a way as to be very successful. Mr. Johnston replies that the intent is to eliminate sterile components that are poured in place. Mr. Barton advises that the City is in a unique position because Haven is a major entrance to the airport and a major arterial to create what will ultimately happen with this property. Mr. Dan Richards, 9333 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, states that retention of Haven Avenue as a high quality corridor is critical to the growth of the City. He feels that the problem which needs to be addressed is that of the thirty percent_ of net lot area landscaping requirement for those owners with smaller parcels. He also expresses concern with restrictions on architecture type and its application to restaurants. Mr. Larry Bliss, 6634 Carnelian Avenue, developer, compliments staff on report and development of high quality standards for Haven Avenue. He advises it is important not to let a McDonald's or other fast food chain develop on the street. Mr. Henry Reiter, Newport Beach developer, agrees with what has been said: however, expresses need for research and development types of single story buildings, as well as office professional that are multiple stories. Mr. Jeff Sceranka, 6211 Pnillips Way, Rancho Cucamonga, addresses sections within the Resolution such as Section 2, No. 2, and restriction that 20% of floor area shall not be used for :ommercial and business support service uses. He feels this restriction should be examined for buildings rather than projects as it may be possible for a large project to dedicate an entire building for such use and still fit in with the 20 percent limit. He reinforces Mr. Richards comments on use of pads or small lots as there will be pads for single story structures which can be used for banks, restaurants, etc. He feels clarification is needed on where they will be allowed. Mr. Sceranka requests clarification that public meeting halls should be a permitted use along Haven Avenue. Mr. Sceranka emphasizes that the discussion of landscape should allow for a hardscape definition as part of the 30% landscape areas. Further, future irrigation systems should consider deep watering because of the shallow rooting of trees that are significantly damaged during wind and rain storms. Planning Commission Minutes -9- September 12, 1,984 Mr. Sceranka asks that in the overlay district, the area between Foothill and Arrow west of Haven be included. Mr. Sceranka points out that at the off ramp of the San Bernardino freeway at Vineyard there is an In and Out Burger which, he states, is the kind of concern that must be addressed here as these incompatible land uses will set the tone of Haven Avenue. He encourages the City to follow through on this kind of study. Mr. Lloyd Michael, representing Cucamonga County Water District, expresses concern on water usage within City and requests consideration of landscaping using substantially less water than is currently being used at such companies as K -Mar, and Coca Cola. He advises that future water will be scarce and costly and every effort must now be made to save this scarce commodity. Chairman Stout closes further discussion from the audience. Following discussion it is consensus of the Commission to add words long -range in Section 1: Goals Statement to "ead "Encourage long -ranee master planned development Section 2: Land Use Policies. It is the consensus of the Commission to modify Iteni 2 to read "Select ancillary commercial and business support service uses, strike currently permitted by the Industrial Specific Plan, Subareas 6 and 7, continue with shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any project. Change wora over-concentration to concentration. Jr is the consensus of the Commission that Section 3: Master Plan Developments is all right. Section 4: Site Orientation: Consensus of Commission that Item 1, word "limited" be changed to read 'avoided unless unusual circumstances" and Item 6 strike 'wish roll -up doors ". Section Streetscape and Landscaping. Consensus of Commission is that this section be rewritten to include use of hardscape areas as part of percentage of net lot area requiring landscaping, credit toward required landscapefhardscape coverage if public art is provided, guidelines regarding watering and watering conservation; treatment of gateway!entrance to Haven Avenue, use of building pads to improve views of buildings. Section 6: Open Space /Pedestrian - Environment. - Consensus of Commission that Item 2 have covered walkways added. Section ': Architecture - Consensus of Commission that another item be added to define architectural style and types of construction that considers ancillary use of buildings and retains high quality of office professional. Planning Commission Minutes -10- September 12, 1984 Section 8: Urban Centers - Consensus of Commission that Item 1 language be refined to define desired architectural components. The consensus of the Commission is that language be added to provide credit for public art. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 84 -99 as amended. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to continue the meeting beyond 11:00 p.m. 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -30 - REITER - The development of 4 industrial buildings totaling 76,M square feet on 5.68 acres of land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 6) located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 7th Street. Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviews the staff report. Discussion ensues regarding the raising of building pads to achieve added building height. Mr. James Barton asks if one and two stories will be built as part of this project. Mr. Reiter replies affirmatively. Mr. Barton states that a minimum of tw: stories is a must along Haven Avenue for this type of building and that this project should be turned down because of the guidelines just adopted by the Commission. Mr. Larry Bliss states that this is exactly the type of project he does not want to see on Haven Avenue. Mr. Reiter indicated he has tried to make an attempt to enhance this project. The Commission discusses elevation of pads to raise buildings approximately 1- 2 feet. Commissioner McNeil asks developers what is objectionable about the building. Mr. Barton states that the rectangular shape of building is objectionable and creates a sterile looking site. I. Planning Commission Minutes -11- September 12, 1984 Mr. Bliss states that this project does not convey corporate image and feels this is --heap construction. Mr. Bliss suggests that parking should be away from building. Mr. Sceranka states that Commission has just adopted a resolution setting guidelines for Haven Avenue requiring an overlay district and feels that this project is in conflict with the resolution just passed. He indicates that the Commission must determine whether there will be an exception to the resolution and whether this building will be totally consistent with the resolution. Mr. Reiter states that he has put everything into the project that has been requested. Chairmar. Stoat states he does not think this meets the guidelines of the resolution totally but does meet it in a lot of respects. He indicates that no one in the audience has seen all of the design changes that this project has gone through bu* there have been a lot of significant changes. Chairman Stout states that there comes a time when there is an equitable issue and this project is a straw person for the guidelines developed for Haven Avenue and it has changed to meet some of the guidelines they wart for Haven Avenue. He further states that he is not an architect and as a consequence may not know what a beautiful project might be for Haven Avenue. Chairman Stout indicates that this project has been important in the development of the guidelines because it has pointed out some of the things that they do not wish to have but there comes a time for equitable considerations when the project has been through the system and you have to draw the line somewhere. Commissioner Barker states that the modifications of the project were an attempt to make it something that it is not. He indicates that it does not project the image that is wanted for Haven Avenue. Further, the modifications were not substantial enough to change the project as only an overhaul would do that. The Commission discusses two areas: whether the project meets the intent of resolutic.a just passed, and whether the applicant has a right to expect that his project will be approved because of the many changes it has gone through in the Design Review process. Mr. Hopson states that the Commission cannot stop someone from planning a project as this is a risk that everyone takes in any city. Further, that no one gains a vested right that backs the Commission into a corner, legally. Courts have taken great pains to defend cities that say the rules of the game are what th =_ pity says is final and the applicant does not have a right to depend on anything the city sa- intil the city approves what the applicant is Planning Commission Minutes -12- September 12.. 1984 doing, but you have no'` spent an which the project is located. California law, it is not what is property owner, the Commission is for a city of 125,000 that will will be alive. inconsiderable amount improving the land on That, he says, is the general tenor of fair to the individual or what is fair to a supposed to be observing and trying to plan stand for longer than some of the Commission Mr. Hopson states that the Commission cannot be carried away with what is fair because if the Commission changes its focus of what is fair for the City or what is fair for the next 30 years, they will get a different conclusion. Commissioner McNiel states for clarification, that Design Review and Mr. Reiter did riot design the buildings; suggestions were made for changes in the building materials, footprint, and lay out. He indicates that in Design Review they are thrashed for letting some people continue as well as not allowing some people to continue and he positions himself for denial. Commissioner Barker states that this project is wrong for the City and he would deny it. Motion: Moved by Barker, secor:ded by McNiel, to deny the project because of its inconsistency with the recently adopted Resolution setting standards for Haven Avenue. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS P. POLICY DECISION ON THE LOCATION OF PORTABLE RECYCLING CENTERS Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviews staff report on mobile uses presented to the Commission. Mr. Darwyn Harder, representing Goodwill Industries, indicates they will not locate a mobile unit on Haven Avenue and there will not be a proliferation of these units because there must be at least a five mite radius between them. Ron Choice, operator of Garden State Paper company, Inc., advises of benefits of recycling and fe,.orable impact on environment. Discussion ensues and the Commission advises that they are not against recycling. The issue is whether this kind of solution is acceptable. The Commission expresses concern with aesthetics, location, landscaping and Planning Commission Minutes -13- September 12. 1984 allowing private concerns to be able to do that sort of thing without incurring cost associated with establishing a business even though they are helping the environment. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to affirm the existing requirements of the Development Code. Chairman Stout states there may be some other solution which may be presented at some other time. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to continue beyond 11 p.m. CONSENT CALENDAR F. PERIMETER WALL DETAILS - TRACTS 12316, 12316 -1, AND 12317 - LEWIS HOMES City Planner, Rick Gomez reviews the staff report. Stan Bell, architect representing the applicant, showed pictures to the Commission of the various textures, design and treatments of walls. Mr. Gomez asks the Commission to make a determination on the percentage of mix between vine treatment, and a finished stucco wall. Following discussion, it is consensus of Commission that the walls be 50 percent vines. Walls should be offset58" slumpstone cap should be used on top of wall which extends approximately 2 inches;vroaght iron fencing at cul -de- sacs; curved slump stone at entrances with planters. Percentage of vine to be examined over a period of time to determine whether it sufficiently covers the perimater walls. Planning Commission Minutes -14- September 12, 1984 ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimousiy, to adjourn. 1:15 a.m. the Planning Commission adjourns. Respect`ulll submitted, Rick Gomez, De ^aty Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -15- September 12, 1984 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting September 26, 1984 Chairman Dennis Stout called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Stout then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: ANNOUNCEMENTS David Barker, Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout None Tim Beedle, Senior Planner; Dan Coleman, Associate Planner; Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner; Robert Dougherty, City Attorney; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Curt Johnston, Associate Planner; Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner; Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner; Janice Reynolds, Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer City Planner, Rick Gomez, announced that the Planning Commission would adjourn to September 29, 1984 for a City tour of recently developed projects. Mr. Gomez suggested several workshop dates for the Commission's consideration to discuss the area development plan for the next phases of Terra Vista. It was the consensus of the Commission that October 15, 1584 be set as the workshop date. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to approve the Minutes of the July 25, 1984 Planning Commission meeting. Ir CONSjNT CALENDAR A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACTS 11804 AND 11805 - ALLEN - A development of 76 condominiums on 11.Z acres of land located at the aerth-.4est corner of Highland and Haven Avenues. B. F.i 83 -01 - CAL14ARK - An agreement to provide access from Heritage Park to the shopping center. ENVIRONMENTAL FSSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT RE ",EW 84 -43 - BARTON - The development of two 2 -story and one 3 -story office building totaling 65,000 square feet on 4.1 acres of land in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) District located on the west side of Utica between Aspen Street and Civic Center Drive - APN 208 - 351 -21. D. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11853 - BARRATT_ IRVINE DIVISION - A total development of 72 condominiums on 5.71 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 du /ac) located on the north side of 19th Street at Ramona Avenue - APN 202 - 171 -41. Commissioner Rempel requested that item "B" be removed for discussion. Commissioner Rempel stated that the 21 -inch gate opening proposed for the Heritage Park access was not wide enough and may cause problems Commissioner Barker agreed and stated that it sho -•'.d be widened to allow handicapped access. Commissioner Rempel replied that 36- inches is the normal width for gates to provide handicapped access. Chairman Stout agreed that the exhibit should be attached to the agreement and should reflect a 36 -inch gate opening. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to adopt the consent cale4dar with the recommendation that the gate opening for PD 83 -01, Calmark, be increased to 36- inches. * * * * vc PUBLIC 9EARINGS Chairman Stout announced that the following two items would be heard concurrently. E. VARIANCE 84 -03 - AMERICAN SENTINEL SELF - STORAGE. INC. - A request to reduce the front yard setback of 35 feet to a minimum of 20 feet along 8th Street for a 45,546 square foot self- storage facility on 2.45 acres of land located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Baker Avenue - APN 207 - 271 -01. Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 26, 1984 F. CONDITIONAL USE i•:.RMIT 84 -17 - AMERICAN SENTINEL SELF - STORAGE INC. - The development of a 45,546 square foot self - storage facility and 1040 sq. ft. caretaker's quarters on 2.45 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 1) category, located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Baker Avenue - APN 207 - 271 -01. Linda Daniels, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Robert O'Learv, representing the applicant addressed the Commission, stating agreement with the staff report, Resolution and Conditions of Approval. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was close. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution approving Variance 84 -03. Motion: Moved by McNiei, seconded by Rempel, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 84 -17. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -27 - BARMAKIAN - The total development of five multi - tenant industrial buildings totaling 60,000 square feet, a 70,300 square foot mini- warehouse facility, and a gas station on 11.03 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 1) category located on the west side of Vineyard, between Arrow and 9th Street - APN 207- 262 -44. Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairran Stout opened the public hearing. Andrew Barmakian, applicant, addressed tht. Commission stating conceal with Planning Divisior: number 4 of the Resolution regarding the use of split face block along the tap band of the buildings and split face vertically fluted block along the bottom of the buildings. Mr. Barmakian proposed that on the mini- storage facility instead of the tilt -up material, vertical fluted split face block be allowed. He further proposed that all of the project walls which carry the b,!rming and landscaping, the walls between the buildings, and the accent wa:is around the corner area of the project be constructed with vertical split face block. Chairman Stout asked which of the alternatives the applicant was proposing to use for the gas station and pointed out that one elevation tailed for a tilt up light sandblasted finish and the other proposed vertical fluted grey split face block. He stated his concern was that a third material was being introduced i,to the design. Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 26: : '4 Mr. Barmakian replied that in order to-tie the project together, whatever material is used on the columns will dictate what material is used on the building itself. Further that he would prefer to have the option of using either the sandblasted concrete block or vertical fluted block on the columns. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout stated either of the two options were agreeable as long as there is a consistency in theme. Commissioner Rempel suggested that the elevations be attached to the Resolution and that approval is granted subject to consistency with the elevations. Dan Coleman, Associate Planter, sugges ed that condition number 4 could be modified to meet the Commission's intent by eliminating staff's proposed language at the end of the Resolution Wid substituting the language "consistent with the attached elevations ". Motion: Moved by Rempei, seconded by Chitiea, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adept the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 84 -27 with amendments to Planning Division condition number 4 to add "consistent with the attached elevations ". AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8587 - PREVITI - A division of 1.04 acres into 2 parcels in the Very Low 2 du /ac Development District located on the southeast corner of Mayberry Avenue and Rancho Street - APN 201- 111 -35. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Jim Previti, 10313 Rancho, Rancho Cucamonga, California, addressed the Commission stating concerns with the requirement that the bridle trail be installed before parcel B is recorded. He suggested that the trail be bends be posted. Mr. Rougeau replied that bonds would be acceptable. Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 25, 1984 Gary Sanderson, Linville /Sanderson Engineers, addressed the Commission and stated that the applicant was also concerned regarding the clarity that the equestrian trail is proposed to run north and south between the two parcels and objects to the trail running south of parcel number one. Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, replied that the map depicts the trail running along the sout:: boundary of parcel number one. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Harker, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 8587 with an amendment to the stan&rd conditions to reflect the bonding for trails. AYES: NOES: ASSENT: CONMIS`JOHERS: REMPEL, SARKER, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, STOUT COMMIS:.,IONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried i. ENYIRONWNTAL ASSESSM'_NT AND PARCEL MAP 8680 - MORRIS & SEARLES - A division of 3.177 acres of land into 3 parcels within the Low Medium o4 -8 du/ac) Development r ?istrict located on the east side of Ramon? Avenue, south of Base Line Foad - APN 1077 - 031 -3. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, rfviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Ed Greer, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission stating agreement with the staff report, Resolution and Conditions. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Rempel, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 8680. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS MCNIEL, REMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, STOUT NONE NONE - carried Planning Commission Minutes _5_ September 26, 1984 J. AL COMFANY - A division of IUU.ib acres oT land into it lots within the terra Vista Manned Community for City park purposes, located on the north side of Base Line Road, between Milliken Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel - APN 202- 221 -142, 25. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Stan Bell, representing Lewis Development Company, addressed the Commission stating agreement with the staff report and Resolution. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Robert Dougherty, City Attorney, advised that since all of the off -site improvements would be done by the City, the words "conditionally" should be stricken from the Resolution and it should simply state "approving". Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Rempei, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Tentative Tract 12809 with amendments to the Resolution to remove the language "conditionally approving" and the substation of "approving ". AYES: NOES: ABSENT: K. ENVIRONMENTAL C0MMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEL, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT COMMISSIONERS: NONE COMMISSIONERS: NCNE - carried 84 -03 -A - H & H INVESTMENTS - A request to amend the venerat Flan Lana use reap Tram Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) on 13.55 acres of land, located on the south side of Ferran Boulevard, between Turner and Ramona - APN 209- 385 -02, 03, 14. Otto Kroutii, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report which recommended that the Commission consider an Environmental Impact Report for this project. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. John Hawkins, H & H Investments, presented a letter to the Commission which outlined the appicant's intentions for this project. Mr. Harkins indicated that if the Commission so desired, the applicant was wilting to have an EIR prepared for this project. Terry Christensen, TAC Development, addressed the Commission in support of the project and urged the Commission's consideration of a focused Environmental Planning Commission Minutes -6- September 26, 1984 Impact Report to expedite the process. Nacho Gracia, 10364 Humboldt, Rancho Cucamonga, Town residents had met with the developers and felt the trade -offs were too high. He stated envisioned a gore centrally located park site has too many problems. He additionally voiced proposed for the project. stated that ),e and other North while the project looks nice, that the North Town residents and that tr,is particular site concern with the high density Mr. Ayala, Rancho Cucamonga resident, asked whether the units would be owner occupied or rental units. Rick Gomez, City Planner, replied that they would be rental units. Chair -.an Stout asked if there are Community development Block Grart funds allo.dted for a park in the North Town area. Bil. Holley, Ca-rmunity Se-vices Director, replied that the City Council's apF-oved allocation of Block Grant Funds this year include the selection of a committee to select and purchase a park site in North Town. He further stated that the land purchase would be completed this year, with development ho;:2iully occurring the following year. Thee were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Rick Gomez, City Planner, advised that if the Commission's intent was to require an Environmental Impact Report, tney may wish to consider the inclusion of the issue of the park site and its impacts. Commissioner Rempel stated concerns with the density of the project. He stated that it doesn't fit in with the area and that there are other uses for that piece of property. He additionally stated that he could not see a need to prepare an EIR and that the best course of action for the community would be denial of the General Plan amendment. Commissioner Barker stated that if the Commission does require an EIR, he would suggest that the impacts of various densities be addressed along with the impacts of traffic on Turner. Commissioner McNiei stated agreement with the comments of the other Commissioners and advised that he would agree with Commissioner Rempel that the General Plan amendment be denied. Commissioner Chitiea stated that along with the issues of density and traffic, the hydrolgy and storm problems should be addressed. Chairman Stout stated that if an EIR is required that other densities such as 4 -8, 8 -14 and 14 -24 should be explored. He stated that if it is economically feasible for the applicant to have an Environmental Impact Report prepared, he would suggest that, in addition to those areas suggested by staff, land use alternatives be explored such as the no project alternative, lower densities, Planning Commission Minutes -7- September 26, 1984 hydrology, and tra °fic. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by MCNiel, to deny the General Plan Amendment. Motion failed 2 -3. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, to require the applicant to prepare an Environmental Impact Report focusing on the areas of hydrology; population; socio- economic factors; land use and planning considerations; traffic; recreation; health, safety and nuisance factors; utilities and public services; appropriateness of the park site and its location; and that the land use alternatives be expanded to include densities at 4 -8, 8 -14, and 14 -24 dwelling units per acre. Commissioner Rempej requested an amendment to Chairman Stout's motion that the possibility might be explored of having a plaza with shops substituted for tF- park. Chairman Stout and Commissioner Barker accepted this amendment to the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 8:15 p.m. - Planning Commission recessed 8:30 p.m. - Planning Commission reconvened * * * * t Chairman Stout announced that the following items would be heard concurrently. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -03 -C - VOLSEDA - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Low Density Residential (2-4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) on 4.78 acres of land located on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Sierra Madre and Comet - APN 207- 222 -08. M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT R4 -03 - VVLDLUh - n request Lo amenu zne ueveiopmenL uistrict Map Prom ^L" ;2 -4 du /ac to "LM" (4-8 du /ac) for 4.78 acres of land genrally located on the south side of Arrow Highway between Cornet and Sierra Madre - APH 207 -222- 08. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Pete Volbeda, applicant, addressed the Commission stating that the density requested is not a large increase from what currently exists at the site. He further stated that the project proposed would be similar to Orchard Creek and would be 1 -story units. Planning Commission Minutes -8- September 26, 1984 Rod Cable, 8680 Edwin, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if Edwin Street would continued or if it would remain a dead -end street. He additionally opposed the increase in density and would stated a preference to see the densities lowered. Chairman Stout advised that the design and street issues would be addressed when the project is submitted to the Commission for review and explained that the items before the Commission this evening are amendments to the General Plan and Development District Maps only. Hans Crolapp, 8289 Arrow Route, opposed the high densities and stated they bring property values down. Mr. Jordan, Rancho Cucamonga resident, stated concerns with the rock pile which exists on the site and asked that it be removed. Mike Chrisian, 8616 Edwin, Rancho Cucamonga, opposed the high densities and opposed the continuation of Edwin Street. Don VaVerka, representing the Orchard Creek project, urged approval of the project. Dale Hubbell, 8281 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga, expressed concerns with the rock dwelling which exists on the site and suggested that it be considered for preservation as a landmark. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout asked if the rock dwelling had been reviewed by the Historical ?reservation Commission. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, advised that the dwelling is not on the City's list of historical structures. He further stated that the possibility of incorporating the structure into the development might be explored by the developer at a later date. Commissioner MCNial stated that the project density is not much of an increase from what currently exists and would not be opposed to approval of the Resolution. Commissioner Chitiea stated that she would support the Resolution of approval and that the rock dwelling could be considered in the future when the project is submitted. Mr. Vaverka indicated that he would be willing to examine the issue of the rock dwelling. Commissioner Barker stated the issues raises by the surrounding property owners would be brought back before the Commission during the public hearing for the project. He further stated that the density as proposed would be between 5 znd 6 dwelling units per acre, therefore he would support the Resolution. Planning Commission Minutes -9- September 26, 1984 Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt_ the !.esolution recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 84 -03 -C to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Sierra Madre and Comet. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution recommending to the City Council approval Development District Amendment 84 -03 -C to amend the Development Districts Mop from "L" (2 -4 du /ac) to "LM" (4 -8 du /ac) on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Sierra Madre and Comet. Chair -man Stcut advised that the following items would be heard concurrently. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL F RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend t Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) Park on 18.8 acres of land located on Baker - APN 207 - 271 -04 through 10, 17 th 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT he beneral Plan Land use Map from General Industrial to Industrial the south side of 9th Street and •ough 20, 35, 37, 38, 43, 44. 84 -03 -B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development District Map from "M" 8 -14 du /ac and Industrial Specific Plan (General Industrial Subarea 1) to Industrial Specific Plan (Industrial Park) for 18.8 acres of land located at the south side of 9th Street and Baker - APN 207 - 271 -04 through 10, 17 through 20, 35, 37, 38, 43, and 44. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Kroutil advised that staff received a letter of opposition from Olan Mills Company, one of the property owners affected by these amendments. Chairman Stcut opened the public hearing. Don Wilson, 8893 Jasper Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated concerns with impacts on traffic and lower property values as a result of the amendments. He asked what types of uses are permitted under this categorv. Chairman Stout explained that uses permitted under the industrial Park category are quite different fror: those permitted in the General Industrial designation in that Industrial Park uses include very light research and development and offices with heavier landscaping than that required by the General Industrial uses. Jeff Sceranka, Rancho Cucamonga resident, suggested the possibility that certain photo processing plants might be allowed in the Industrial Park category in instances where a retail outlet is located in the front and processing is done in the back; therefore, Olan Mills may be able to locate their plant in that location. Planning Commission Minutes -10- September 26, 1984 Chairman Stout advised that the processing operation proposed by the Olan mm s Company is on a much larger scale and that their retail outlets are typically at another location. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated concerns with the compatibility of placing the Industriall Park category or. lots 9 and 10 when the surrounding lots have not yet gone in. Mr. Gomez pointed out that nonconforming uses will still exist and that the master plan requirement would be the method used to look at the uses to assure neighborhoou compatibility. Otto Kroutii, Senior Planner, advised that action taken by the Commission this evening would change basically the zoning of the General Plan and Development District Maps. Additionally, modifications to the industrial Specific Plan would be brought back to the Commission with recommendations for either an amendment to the subarea or the creation of a new subarea, and suggested that Commissioner Renpel's concerns with Lots 9 and 10 could be addressed at that time. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval to the City Council of General Plan Amendment 84 -03 -Bt to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) /General Industrial to industrial Park on the south side of 9th Street and Baker. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval to the City Council of Development Distric. Amendment 84 -03 -B to amend the Development District Map from "M" (8- 14 eo -'ac) and Industrial Specific Plan (General Industrial Subarea 1) to ic::ustrial Specific Plan (Industrial Park) on the south side of 9th Street and Baker. P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 84 -03 -D - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) on 15.8 acres of land located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, south of 7th Street - APN 209- 161 -04, 16, 23 and 210 - 341 -72. Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. Larry DeCrono, area property owner, requested that this area be compatible with surrounding properties. He additionally expressed concerns that this designation may hold a property owner at 4, 6, or 8 dwelling units per acre and would not like to be prohibited from coming in with a site plan at 10 Planning Commission Minutes -11- September 26, 1984 units per acre. There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Chairman Stout stated that in terms of proper mixture and what the adjacent Ontario area is designated, 2 -4 is probably what this area should be designated; hwoever, 4 -8 is a resonable compromise to assure economic viability. Commissioner Barker stated that capping the density off at 8 units per acre is liberal and still compatible with the surrounding area. Commissioner Chitiea stated agreement that 4 -8 is a consistent range. Commissioner McNiel stated that this area is a unique situation and did not believe that 4 -8 would negatively affect the property owners. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, unanimously carried, to adopt the Resoluticn recommending to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 84 -03 -D to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) on 15.8 acres of land located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, south of 7th Street. NEW BUSINESS Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -34 - O'DONNELL - The development of a 91,700 square foot warehouse /distribution building on 4.5 acres of land in the General Industrial (Subarea 11) category located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Pittsburgh - APN 229 - 261 -44. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the staff report. Jim Westling, applicant, addressed the Commission stating agreement with the Resolution and Conditions of approval. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, unanimously carried, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the Resolution approving Development Review 84 -34. * * s * * PUBLIC COMMENTS Commissioner Barker requested that the Commissioners and staff take into consideration an interim design review team to handle the heavy volume of projects scheduled for design review. He suggested the pcssibility of dividing the Design Review Committee into residential and commercial review committees. Planning Commission Minutes -i2- September 26, 1984 1 Commissioner Barker additionally requested that staff lock into a north -south stop sign for the intersection of Hillside and Beryl. AD30URNMENF Motion: Moved by Rempel, :.econded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adjourn. 9:40 p.m. - Planning Commission Adjourned Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez Deputy Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -13- September 26, 1984 0 11 D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DR 84 -24 - HANRICH - The development of a 1S,UUU square foot warehouse /office addition on 12 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy - Industrial category (subarea 9) located at 11266 Jersey Boulevard, west of Milliken Avenue, APN -•209- 142 -03. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re ea Issuance of a Negative Declaration for Q opment Review 84 -24. B. Pur ose: Development of a 13,000 square foot warehouse /office a �tion C. Location: 11266 Jersey Boulevard D. Parcel Size:12 acres overall, 4.5 acres improved site. E. Existing Zoning:Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 9). F. Existing Land Use_ Manufacturing Industry G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 9) South - Manufacturing; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 9) East - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 9) West - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 9) ITEM A Page #2 H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Heavy Industrial North - Heavy Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East - Heavy Industrial West - Heavy Industrial I. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The subject property is 12 acres andan irregular shaped lot. Only the west 4.5 acres are improved. This area contains a 16,000 square foot manufacturing building and a storage yard on the east side of the building, This property is also rail served. The project is proposed within the improved site. II. ANALYSIS. General: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessmt.L and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. RECOMMENDATIONS: Issue a Negative Declaration for Development Review 84-24 based upon site analysis and the Initial Study which indicates that the Proposed project will not cause significant adverse impacts to the environment. tted, City Planner RG: DP: cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "S" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Initial Study, Part I 0 I I .i I 0 i 0 E I 1 i 1 /9-3 9 0 L� � h z ^O y, � z Y Li H I Y .5 iI .1 ' 'r 1 I t IC T I NJJ L �I �i 1 I I 1 t � 5c�yp 7�yC I •fi[����YY s� 1 6aX 11 • f� I i 1 I t J � a I — � � T r h r O z 6 U �O G CU z E J04 ICJ =:Y OF RzUiCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT IN ORMATION SHEET - Tc, be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this for- must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Studv. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report shot ?d be supp'ied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the propcsed project. PROJECT TITLE: L..o W" L LATEIA MIC-14.L CZW - NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE CONCERNING THI-S PROJECT: PROJECT (STREET_ ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Z -1 PRUJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 10 coo 45q).FT CHW45d. "01710I ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSE B" ILDINGS, IF ANY: 2.45 fo . . AAA . 102A-18- DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY .^, XISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SFEETS): Is the project part of a larger -project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant enviror=en + :: impact? E 1-2 t4-s WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO ?C 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? iC 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? k 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? Y% S. Remove any existing trees? How many? R 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as tonic substances, flammables or explosives? is Explanation of any YES answers above: 11 IMPORWONT: If the project ir_volves the construction of residential units, comp_2te the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the DeftlopCtNxit Revi_Cjr""mmittee. Date &Pr 1d' 54_Signa Title I -3 /1 E 11 Ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1934 T0: Chairmar, and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrina, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DESIGN REVIEW 34 -33 - R.L.R. D V LO M M M ANY - fie deve opment of a 34,710 square foot industrial /warehouse building on 1.63 acres of land in the general industrial category (subarea 10) located at the northwest corner of 7th Street and Toronto Avenue, APH- 209 -401 -8 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action P.equested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration for Development Review 84 -33. B. Purpose: Development of a 34,710 square foot industrial /warehouse building. C. Location: Norti+west corner of 7th Street and Toronto Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 1.63 acres E. Existino Zoning: Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 10) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning: North - vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 10) South - Multi Tenant Warehouse; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 11) East - Manufacturing; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 10) West - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 10) ITEM B Page #2 H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial /Rail Served North - General Industrial /Rail Served South - General Industrial East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - General Industrial /Rail Served I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is an irregular shaped corner lot, due to the angular design of 7th Street (see site plan), and slopes gradually downward from north to south. E Ii. ANALYSIS: General: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no CA significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. 1II. RECOMMENDATION: Issue a Negative Declaration for Development Review 84-33 based upon site analysis and the Initial Study which indicates that the proposed project will not cause significant adverse impacts to the environment. tted, I K..X, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:DP:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "S" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Initial Study, Part I E •,,OL fI i a .1, T 3 I' /eG/v n /Lm JL 2] A�r. CITY OF RANCHO CL'CATMONGA n- kNTNLNG DIVLS aN ✓5�- NORTH ITEM: m— 54 - 3-S _ TITLE: LOCa4-r OISA MAP F_XHIBiT: ° A.' SCALE: a kdLe 8 -3 t- 1 }- Til {lTi 1 IICLK /G a .1, T 3 I' /eG/v n /Lm JL 2] A�r. CITY OF RANCHO CL'CATMONGA n- kNTNLNG DIVLS aN ✓5�- NORTH ITEM: m— 54 - 3-S _ TITLE: LOCa4-r OISA MAP F_XHIBiT: ° A.' SCALE: a kdLe 8 -3 �9 - "J - t'1 I I tYi)'1 1 1 I i1 CONCEPTUAL. SITE PLAN 7TN S -ME-E LANDSCAPE CITY OF RANCHO CUCATVIONG.k PLANNING MISION 11 W d O crF- z O E ITEM.- 7\�- '- 3 _ 0 TITLEE: 5as AkAp L,a.,q FLeA e,..t EXHlBCt Eton CSCALE- -.t S� El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Envirormmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Stud,... The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee Vill make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will hatwe a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further infor -a- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: R.L.R. DEVELOPM NT COrroANY APPLICANT'S N;LME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: R.L.R Development Co. 3838 Carson Street, Suite 311 Torrance, CA NA.`! E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCEILNING THIS PROJECT: Randv Jepson - 3505 Cadi_: Bldq. L -5, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714/549 -0544 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL ':J.) N/W Corner of 7th & Toronto Parcel 12 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: N/A I- I 09-'5 PROJECT DESCRIPT'10' DES construction of 34,710 sc.ft. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ARTY: 1.63 acres (vacant)-proposed building size 34,714 sq-ft. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMP.LS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF P.NY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Site is essential void of any landscape eatures_ Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No- r-71 1-2 / _6 ® WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing - noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create charges in the existing zoning or _ general plan designations? _ X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal cf _ potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTxNT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the b :!st of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my krowledae z i belief. I -further understand that additional infor=nacion may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the DevelgQment Review Committee. Date 7/20/84 Signature Title Prc-ject Manager 0 11 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the P anning Commission. FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR Dcs'.GN REVIEW 84 -37 - FORHAN The eve opment o a two s'.ory in ustria ii ding totaling 65,256 equare `,eet on 5.33 acres of land in the General Industrial Category ( subarea 14) located at the end of the cul -de -sac on Hvs,.op Drive, east of the Devore Freeway (I -15), APN- 229 - 283 -60 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: issuance of a Negative Decsarati.on for Development Review 84-37. B. Purpose: Development of a 65,256 square foot two-story industrial building. C. Location: South end of Hyssop Drive, east of the Devore Freeway 7l 15). D. Parcel Size: 5.33 acres E. Existinq Zoning: Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 14) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 14) South - Vacant, City of Ontario East - Vacant, Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 14) West - Devore Freeway (1 -15), industrial Specific Plan (subarea 13) ITEM C H. General Plan, Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - General Industrial South - City of Ontario E ?st - General Industry West - General Industry I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is an irregular shaped lot situated along the Devore Freeway, at the end of Hyssop Drive cul -de -sac, and adjacent to 4th Street. The Devore Freeway is at a higher elevation than this property. The south portion of the property contains a retention basin to be maintained. II. ANALYSIS• General: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. RECOMMENDATION: Issue a Negative Declaration for Development Review 84-37 ased upon site analysis and the Inital Study which indicates that the proposed project will not cause significant adverse impacts to the environment. tted, icli Gb"f ity Planner RG: DP: cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Initial Study, ?art I c -a 11 M- El. I s i i1 1 f I r 3 iyi i , C5,�� NORTH CITY OF A —3`a RANCHO CUCAINIONGA iTLE= L %A-p 1 M PLAINNING DINMON EXHIBM t� a SCALE, iie'T T4 �c�i,E:_ C -3 1 ,r1 o•. o•, j 7 ; i i 3 _ z s 1 . ! kr- 4 C -%1 i t i CJ C z 6 U 0 C u� C c:1 l co CJ C z 6 U 0 C u� C V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGz INITIAL STUDY PART I - P --OJECT INFORYLATION SHEET - To be completes by applicant Environmental. Assessment Review Fee: $67.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where tom_ project application is made. Upon receipt of this ar,:ication, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part IT_ of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determ inatlons: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Irapact Report w?I1 be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be suppli.d by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: APPLICAN -TVS N4ILLF ADDRESS, TE NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON i.7 BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJZs T: rv-, F-crha = f LOCA TION OF PROJECT (STREET ",DDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THPIAGENCY ISSiJING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 '-5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, _TF ANY: FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND A, � <' z s DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION OK TOPOGPAPHY, PLANTS ;TREES), ANIMALS, ANY f`ULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSAi:: SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which aithc.:gh individually small, nav as : whole have significant environmental ,Lapact? /Iv - I -2 C- �o 1 .11 L 11 WIL•Li THIS YROJEC ^_ : YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Crea':e a substantial change in existinc noise or vibratjDn? 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existint :on-;ng or general piar- designations? _! 5. Remove any existing trees? How manv? 6. Create tie need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flar=ables or explosives? Explanation of an-v YES IMPORTANT: If the project involves the ^onstruction �f residential units, complete tre form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certifv that the state.-nents furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of :ry knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Developm2r_t Review Committee. Date Signat r�i e Title z4e-.cv 7--_ 1- 3 11 E L'A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STASF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIkDNMENTAt ASSESSMENT FOR DcSIGN REVIt 54 -3U - ruru•f - Tie developmert of a 63,000 square foot industrial/ warehouse building on 3.09 acrd- of land in the Industrial Park Category (subarea 6) loci. -!d at the southwest corner of 7TH Street and Utica Avenue, APN 209 -411- : and 4. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration for Development Review 84 -38. B. Purpose: Development of a 633,000 square foot industrial /warehouse tuilding. C. Location: Southwest cor;,r_•r of 7th Street and Utica Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 3.09 acres E. Existinq Zoning: Industrial Specific Plan ( subarea 6) F. rxisting Land Oise: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: North - Warehouse; Industrial Specific Plan ( subarea b) South - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 6) East - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 10) West - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (subarea 6) ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 84 -38 October 24, 1984 Page 2 H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park. North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - General Industrial /Rail Served West - Industrial Park I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is an irregular shaped comer lot, due to the angular design of 7th Street (s =e site plan), and slopes gradually downward from north to south. The west property.line is approximately 550 feet from the center line of Haven Avenue. This property is not within the Haven Avenue Corridor Overlay District. II. ANALYSIS: General: Part of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has corppleted Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. RECOMMENDATION: Issue a Negative Declaration for Development Review 84 -38 Eased upon site analysis and the Initial Study which indicates that the proposed project will not cause significant adverse impacts to the environment. tied, City Planner RG:DP :cv Rttachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial "Au usa "C" UDu Stu - Location Map - Site Plan - Landcape Plan - Elevations dy, Part I D -a �J 11 E El G� NORTH CITY OF li �_ 3 RANCHO CUCA10 \GA � �, g T E ���,, _ PL,k,NNdwNC DIVLS[Oi`d EXHIBIT- B•' SCALE- tioT Ta m 4 -y If . .f. 1 .i 1 : J+ • (l• 1 •,i: � .1 r � E CITY OF R. NCHG CUCyMONGA T \IT -AT OTTT�%' PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environ- rental review, this form must be ccmpleted and sub - .fitted to the Development Review cc ittee thro::ch the department where the project application is maca. upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analvsis staff will prepare Fart II of the initial Studv. The Development Review C= -.itt_e will =,eet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public maeti. ^.c at which ti-,e the project is to be heard. The Ccr= ittee will make one of three deter- 'nations: 1) The p' :oject will have no sicai- ficant envircn.-ental im.pact and a Negative Declaration wi3.'_ be filed, 2) The project will have a significant e:: :•fir ..-ertai i -:pact and a Environ mental 1-pact Report will be pre_ared: cr 3) An additional in= or ^ation report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion con cerning the proposed project. PY:IZZCT TITLE: Forem Investments APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: ForPm InvPCrmontc 265 San Angelo Drive, Claremont CA 91711 (7i4) 624 -526R NAIL, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON n.) 5E CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Pete McCormi j<__=_2665 San Angoln nnc.,P Claremont CA 91711 - (714) 624 -5868 LOCATION OF PRC .7ECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) I.W. Corner 7th and Utica Parcel 3 E 4 of Parcel ;619L LIST OTHER PEP_ %1ITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDEF.AL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -1 PROJ -CT 1pC`LTJTTnC D= SCRIP ^I01. OF ?ROJ Concrete tilt Industrial /Warehouse/ F C OF PROJ °_C= AR?A ::ND SQU RE FOOTAGE OF -' r•0 �` =D 3 : - 'G • -F Y - 3.09 acres - New Building to be 63 000 sq.ft. ✓�`� _ -_.. _. _ _� _. nL C_T^ -XG OF THE: P:.C,: �C. .OPOG'r-,P4Y, PL ?N_S (TREES' r_c:*__ - ,IS- ORiCA. OR SCE" ASiCC:S, CS O_ __.E'_'_.; I_cG ? =O? 3?3 ?L S %GD T_F.S DESC3I ?" IO\ OF i3 ::G ._3JCS r�I _.. T'S= (ATTACH NzCSSS -r' S - =I S). El _The subject project has historically been agricultural property. This p rperty and the surrounding property are and have trarsitionPd into industrial warehouse buildings. At this time there are no existing structures on the subject property. e is the project pa=t of ,a larger project, one of a series Of r:u:%lat_ve a.-ticns, which although individually small, nay as a whole have significant environmental impact? An individual parcel on approved property within an area zoned and planned for future industrial development. r1 % -2 tk-& ' t_:_LL THIS ?ROJ =CT YES NO XX 1. Create a substantial char= e in grcund contours? XX 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? XX 3_ Create a substantial change in de -any for n_ iDal services (police, =ire, rater, sew ace, etc.) ? XX �. Create chances in the exist_nc zenir.g or c-- eneral Dian desicnatio -s? :;X 5. Remove any existing trees? ow XX 6. Create the . need for use or disposal of -- =entially hazardous matt- _'ials s :_ch as ..C`:_c sU.^stances, fla=ables or E= •== lC�i'.•e5? ExDlar.at:iCn of any YES answers above: IMPORT-=NT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the stateme.ts furnished above and in the attached exhibits present :he data and infor-mation required foz this initial evaluation to t_le best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information -,av be required to be subm" d etbr a equate evaluation can be made by the Devel me Review Commi ee_ Date /p /y _Signature Title General Partner T-3 �� l 11 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dina Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 11928 - DAVIS - Design revisions to an approved tract, the nigh grid Villas project, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, East of Archibald Avenue. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Elevation design revisions. B. Purpose: Cost Reduction. C. Location: North sine of Highland Avenue approximately 800 feet east of Archibald Avenue. D. Parcel Size: 5.85 acres E. Existing Zorina: Medium Residential II._ ANALYSIS• A. General: The applicant s requesting design revisions to the approved elevations (Oc?cber 14, 1981) for Tentative Tract 11928. The Design Review Committee has evaluated tha proposed revisions and Rakes the following recommendations: 1. Projected (Pop -out) windows. '. Decorative cap on all walls. 3. The use of eyebrow roof p::ljection.; above windows and any bare wall areas. 4. Tile on chimney stacks in 3ach unit cluster to continue consistent color and form. 5. The uze of dark anodized window frames on all windows. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 11928 October 24, 1984 Page 2 lne Committee reco�wends approval in conjunction with the above design recommendations. The applicant has confurmed to the above recommedations. iII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed design revisions for Tent�tive Tract 11928 based on the Development Review Committee Conditions of Approval. Respectfully submitted, 1RiCR Gomez City Planner i RG:DP:cv Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhib=t - Elevations Initial St:idy Part 1 S, a 11 D R3i21 I 4142-T ! Ri42 T f 18112 T R112 -T R11Z VACANT I VACANT I C Cft RANCH jl�NT V�.T I r.UVT R110T K PROJECT, .SITEW1. R185T Nul iii R185T R185 -T R185 -T IR=,�f� 1 ❑ R185 T I R185 -T vAtANT rweT rACUni i�pLl I vatANT • vAUnv VV CITY RANCHO CL�XI0\TGA PLANNING DrlrblQN VICLMTY MAP ro scan AvAr� ITEM- T7- 11928 TITLE-. L- omrios+ MAP EXHIBIT: SCALE ADT NORTH NORTH CITY OF ITEM: T T i I cl? R- CHO CCAMOiNGA Trlu: 1 SITE Tel PLAINTNiNG 1DRrNaN EYHI,I,iT= a `� SG11E:4-1cTTv';�LE 0 0 E F' F 19 ii J F-- l 0 z s� �" � z e w■ as ■ no sass, rots ..Z also i �rss an an n /raa ■v ■as rral \■ra ■: • r■n a � •rrr �r awn i t � n ;' 14 "1 1711 D Ell E E Z a i Q W J lu z cc ;57- a 0 �i CD J_ m .Z w e Z O Q F- N L n 0 �oI i J n VI w!� r h U O U O u � L_ � Z E 2 O 1= cv J O L 0 LU L•' E- L � J U C� U rot 0 f � V i F 6 G z G :; 0 11 11 I- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF F R ' PORT DATE: October 24, 1984 TO: Chairn;an and Me -bees of the Planning Coen:ission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 12490 - AMERICAN NATIONAL - Reapplication for design review of site plan and architectural changes for 121 condominiums on 6.1 acres of land, located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a review and approval of new architectural design and sate plan for 121 condominiums. Tentative Tract 12490 was originally approved on January 25, 1984. The original Conditions of Approval and minutes of the January 25, 1984 Planning Commission meeting are attached for your review and consideration. II. ANALYSIS: A. ons a the proposes to change the architectural style to a Mediterranean theme incorporating a tile roof which has been consistently used throughout the neighborhood along Foothill Boulevard and surrounding projects, as shown -in Exhibit "E ". The previously approved elevations were approved conditionally subject to providing additional architectural treatment on the ends of each building such as a nip roof, false windows, and /or horizontal siding, and window pop -outs on corner windows and /or selective use of planter boxes on the upper story front elevations. Changes to the floor plans have resulted in an overall reduction in the building footprint size which increases open space areas and shifts the location of some buildings, as shown in Exhibit "C ". ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12490 - American National October 24, 1984 Page 2 B. Design Review Co ittee: The Committee reviewed the new elevations and site plan and recommended approval subject to: - Orienting end units to the side by relocating entrances to sides. - Pairing garage door detailing to emphasize identity of individual units. Colored renderings will be available at the Planning Commission Meeting. III. RECOMMENDAT.'_�ON: The Design Review Committee recommends approval of The site plan and architectural changes. Attachment-: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Approved Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Approved Elevations Exhibit "E" - Proposed Elevations Exhibit "F" - Example of Mediterranean Style Resolution No.. 84 -10 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - January 25, 1984 Resolution Approving Design Review E u i�J t 0 SITS; :5JN „v;AF2-! - i o, Boo S. F- la.eso iv C [P- 05WE -D AapA oily) o� c.f 12'10 S � �!geGERrGy ?ARKING SumHAFf am %PK+s spur- P�t.;.n n • sec ...n . -. t voo CITY OF RANMO CUCAMONGA R A I TENG D1Vt DN :Se K .T fnV- S.- o NORTH ITF1\ I: 71 -- TrrU: EXHIBIT: �_ SCAI,E: F -4 0 �WEi4 '.P i%:i 17 Jfftit�� to a�.,..T _•• i ._�• X2.9 %e 'Rtcer+f t ewz Gor..:teE �7o.at 90 A ref —T °4 C O.i :'a.uyi,•s) i o, Boo S. F- la.eso iv C [P- 05WE -D AapA oily) o� c.f 12'10 S � �!geGERrGy ?ARKING SumHAFf am %PK+s spur- P�t.;.n n • sec ...n . -. t voo CITY OF RANMO CUCAMONGA R A I TENG D1Vt DN :Se K .T fnV- S.- o NORTH ITF1\ I: 71 -- TrrU: EXHIBIT: �_ SCAI,E: F -4 0 0 0 1 O � 1 '1 f L, _rte I I l/ v NURT•H CITY OF ITEM: RAANNCHO tCUCAMO \'GA TmLE: _ PL ANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: CI SCALE: _ F-S 3 i > 3 i o �i 4 ;r F 1 L ill Y ' d 8 i ,1 r Mill..�pty Z V y CITY OF r mxl. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE= PLANNING DIVISIQV EXHIBIT :- SCALE= F —b f I i 1 � � � I li 1 I V: 1. 1 1 �, �•; / / ./ � 1 vp 1 ♦/ 1 • .I.'. • ITEM: •• PLANNING DIVISION " C RESOLUTION NO. 84 -10 C A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI7YY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12490 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12490, hereinafter "Map" submitted by ,%meritan National Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision for condominium purposes of 6.1 acres of land located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Foothill into 2 lots, agularly came before the Planning Cormission for public hearing and action on January 25, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, ''_'he Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: tSECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12490 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e; The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts Gn the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. F - lb t 5 SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Mao yo. 12490, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Additional architectural treatment shall be provided on the end of each building such as, a hip roof, false windows, and /or horizontal siding. Also, window Dop -outs on corner windows and /or selective use of planter boxes shall be provided on the upper story front elevations. Revised elevations shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review prior to issuance building permits. 2. Permanent easement for secondary (emergency) access from adjacent property owner shall be required prior to recordation. Said access shall be provided in accordance with Foothil. Fire Protection District standards. 3. Dwelling units shall have a minimum 150 square foot private open space. 4. Project shall provide recreation area /facility and energy conservation features as required by the Development Code. Details shall be included in construction plans and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The tot lot shall be relocated adjacent to the swimming pool. 6. Details of the carports, recreation building, tot lot, and laundry building snall be included in the construction plans and approved by the city Planner prior to issuance of building permits. - 7. Perimeter fence on the sout%erly tract boundary shall not exceed eight (5) feet, as measured on the south side. Any fencing above eight (8) feet in height shall be constructed of wrought iron or tubular steel that is non -view obstructing. Enaineerinq Livision: 1. Vineyard Avenue pavement shall be reconstructed to conform to existing City standards for a secondary highway on both sides of centerline. The structural section shall be determined by a soils report prior to final approval fo the improvement plans. The west side of Vineyard shall be widened as necessary to accomlodate four lanes of traffic with a left mourn lane. 2. A drainage pipe may be required to be installed in Vineyard to accc=odate flows from site to daylight downstream with an outlet structure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. c 3. The applicant shall be required to acquire a private drainage easement through the adjoining property to the east prior to issuance of any permit for development.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25th DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNIVG COMMISSION OF T-U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis LJ� /S�to�u�t, ) rmlann ATTEST: RicK ,Gomel; Deputy Secretary I, Rick; Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cacam. nga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE F-lo a y V d t z 0 0 i 0 a V x g O 0 0 O G N • � O u •W9 < R� 1 fyj N ( J V' b9� N dC d9N C N -T• 9o:•,w P 9acc eto n'a° c c� �b o_c c�c �o� nO N T O O r T p N d L O L •-' "• i N c C i� yq Lv_ y r. r .di .T. 6 it N L Nr` L°_ Nr Ned ^P yY N O P d T ` O° V '• r C F —� 6 V � b � .f L N C C T O L Y d O _ J L y r q C 2 9 • Y V q C V_ N = N 6 �• z� V 7 d r' r 9 T O O T 6 Vim.` Y L2:, V J d y C O d bQ cc, „ d v•_•Oi OL— a s.� VC GeCJ n N^ C d d Nc� � O .0. T R C C N —61 =° n.no 9T sd �a O rO d TV Nd Or N.^-. iL_ � qrV T1 O Ord vC0 'N ^T LLB d ^•�L- � V mOw 'L L y jOr. rC '�_ NVNU n J P M N r O tW 1]n - E O O T '� N r L O a• C d Y r 0 r _ VCfyL J[ V _ Li ty rT` CnNr =6� 09 9J - 9 � c n m q G G l E l O C r 9 q_ VI r_ x O i. N JC �1 I to o. s — d L8 mb < O c` O \N I z 0 0 i 0 a V x g O 0 0 O G N • � O u •W9 < R� 1 fyj N ( J F — v, N V' b9� N dC d9N C N -T• V y d O - r?F C i� yq Lv_ uN °cc ugq aq L Nr` L°_ Nr Ned ^P yY N -C_ LN z� 9 nHO qo Vim.` _ bQ cc, d d Nc� qo n —61 =° n.no 9T sd �a MO NC tW 1]n - E C Nq J[ V nC N» C� COV 9C rI � V� c VI r_ x O i. N JC �1 I to o. s < c` F — v, N N F- %a C a..-. DO ^r0 S <O, O O j J-J wy C_N3 3 a?_CS 0 ni G O• .n N] v OS �O .-� a S° • O 'J` 9 N3 N L wj o = O N ro O OR�IpO O.m - o .A 17- ; 6 n o r a 00 O _J N YO�w O °G�6��`-r3 7 .Gq 7i O�w a es r G�O N • 7 rop b , > 9 CJ3 3. y �� u b1 NCO 0G Ar -•6ro a J 3Sq ON F _ Sr+6 OiN` n�G 'yJ NUJ � q�0a SGZ_^ pa o- I O o^ J OWN° G� G 6NN ^pro SGT C6 .P P Oyb N C, SM O.:zr,aw _r b w 2,2 � O a p w w S r N O_ 1 w O ^fro G O W 6 j d p.On p.iOi iu nr a i` 0'%I O O pct 9i° 6w PA .i Ti Iqt \� 0 1 o u ¢ P u - O P O Op r -1 :!5z O O y'r < O 0.1M� N CqP ^Nr 006 ^N = J Ow M P." Ow0- 6Sg1... �O� � C 60ro il0 <�JO 7 JSJOi^ ^ Jp non � �? y _pp r O= r w r N��� g n ro o g N R N q � O• j n 4 � =O 0 +�� Onro aOn� �� '�Jd>fG_i= r G•. O. 6 M C q � GN 1ti ^C ?rq OS °r u�n w] l O a O1f0 w� O 6G'- r O'N ru sebi0 nr ir06i r 1 n N Y J p o3J 0 0?° 0.r = , O•° 7. 8 . x r 9=— uqi 6 N W O° 9 _ S^ a r. �� ���6 ^ O rn O� —or O lOOrp r S6 N qv ;q �° d]OC M1O On� Oro < Ain g6A1O_ - nr0 6rS °N�y�n 'JN TSn r1N� O O ^O V]C< r N r =-J y e_ ^ o w ^ 0.-� Jp °O°q ^ 4 OfwOn Y� 9Sy��00 nO�G '^ y^30n yN J ^N J�ZN L.�j r�nN �n Of w�j^ X000 S .�. r;00, mJ ro q w f10 .� r3N l^..gro fnPR °w7j GZ Zoo SG r� SO 1p3 O ` 3 p n O 0D.. 6 O m 7 b C Z ^O 'J`p -•6 ^JUSN (>�O °aOO �NfD O ^J PO rot i N N�6 �Ot,D O 6r b� rSw1AOY N rP�gOZ Cfy f9 AC- NO'NP s p Qa r0._ ^rSS_r °p SrwO rw ir9 w N q; 0 000�Ogn< nn 1PC Y Sw �O Ow w6y� °r J ^Y ni Sri 6 O `� ° .1w n ° q 0 y• ° � 0 w ac iai „ <�in� = ^ ^gnmw 0o,- dv$ niq. 0 r f04 CY .TO ABM `C 0.100 11wW w,D.O lr. zfD fD O�i F- %a cn o�sP - -L - -LT G� Nr aT- Nc°a r • 7 n L J E 6 J � C y N c` 2- r �•J� uC VC- SCN .�� 49 V C _V p TVCVI L °� �p°iT Jl n JDr Cl nfd H` L 9 C OP Vgo i ^' 9NL> jO � L a .+ V � S� °O^ G ° rI G r G V ." n.• i „ _ O T 3NP d y N C � P < <" •+ O D C G N J G N S N _ C V O p i TroN _ p r C C � Q.L.. V Cl. L U � O � Z D• te ! T w y 9 . 9 .e L° r 4` L C 9 N� V N V °- W U V a^ G P G G .• .. -J •.r " > 2 C o Gw 6_y C fi� � ...Ld•J •Ova L �'. .� N L = Oa GN =O r N L L �• N P V .� T = _ _J L Q N N r L N` PO aT2 GJ pC yp V L6 =Tp�V G G aMC > yN =7 ^J �pL >N 00� L't P -Z d L � L C N: r j N °p r O C M O C L V 9 C> p N ^ C M C N C �r_LC Nr Cy CDpVO 4Lr �rH _Lyq _Nf C LC °�P LCr 'C =r? Ly T N-• 9D O N6r LT., .Vw GOT7 �TcYq ° QO ^C d °�jr nTf -J C`C •e ° 94C Pry a 6 O`= n� T OL L T� C r y L TD C - c i � G e J� i a t .• w C r r C� .� W C o p •9 E L> py Tp T TJ T L C ° L C- C ^ O- G P 9 O C= •O 9. L N V D u C =�� 9 C. V- y^ v O L C O C C V L 9 V - C a 4 9 -O �dO rNa ••10 pNC 0l 6` 6 N 0 4 'V� 6a 00. tv ar D Vr N o 3�-O+ JLC� �A�e� C10 OaO.r NI \� VI =CP •t6 r6•_4C brrl PL V 90 _ cO� OD �OLq DO�00 CO r GCPp.p opOC a 6C C y r p • ° N Y 9Q C 6N -J N^ C� G p r•L' VnLO g y 0 a 0 4 ` N � V _+ r dr C V r p-• G � T S V N L • a b C 2 .s p..r •� N Y r L° L L :. D O o O 69p w0 w9L9 P4O °y O � SWwPP £� T N LN9a C NC +=VCti S4 p S r TrC VO rna+_ C L C q^ `- y C F •bi V �OrO =Nf�N N w p n--7 pN o.°_ -.� Lac i�G .... e° .:q °t C 6 a r NGL O C G 6 P U O N C y E� V LV O jJ ?��N °L N 4qN °jG ..0 MCT ZC C� r � L`LNa -CT LLN r^ na N r V M T C L`-I r=Ec 4 4 a PNw oG cO.Z c; v C�6r- O C d CN L N r MO.L..LVV LV Nr F N prvV°tl °: eYP 4 Ju` LSO 6 -r _> L �C ON_9 C 6 6° W4NO p3N�N°N LNG <D 6NjNVY 7 NI N I N L F -13 cn a •N C 7. J � : p 9 N +I �j d �� 1' S 7� 0 9 J O< 1 Z. 3; D 3 i^.. 'J •Ja O' D .O ^6O •� ?J 7�� 1 ' I � A4�N � �3-.- ...J J� .i 70 � b �• I^ w�v� vn ea N ow�� ° +'v .°.'.n o7� —J moo. � Ic AJ•n ^� ^ 1J1 ooN.��nr .��= .e o'. J _ �-' �?. .J. .N J � •J O 1 - e C A A^ � s a t 16 ��v' '�• A� I n:M� �Y ^i s^ 9AO pzy :=" � a °•. Y S a I d 7 O � N -O � r3•. a � jJA � <N n � A ov J sN Jn' aP v cA w ~a a °,a33 No A N o O N A ^< 6 I ncoo 6r.p 6�.• -w Y �C N O•+nY n.Oa aZV GCi �^S Oo!1 a6OT C ^'O Pi �_O Ar•0 AO J'�•�O. NT OON O�.N 'A< 1f' � 6•�awl O �•�O C r C �O w O A w ro.Jp 6' 6 C /� d •i .9 w O 6 6^ G r �� �� 9• 1 .: 6 ^ A C p 6 AZl O J � � w° q� S C J w J O_ N`fAl� 6S Y�'b rr Sr � CS 0 6jA0 � .•.j. �•`,•C N w_ N ' o r•C'•C 90 i° .°i. n p n A C P p G r n A O 7 m Sa i�° n 3 iG < f' J•L6 ��jb pJ A rn• i °- w � 4 ISp ^wJ DCO 7 P J ° A 6 o 6A0 �y 96 6 i � _6O a nv O =J AA10 J ID ONO YY G NS 6 ESN SS NO J ww�Y J.Ap C_rZ R pup w9 n o A^ �.n p _ -it Iry 'o. ? �nJ � '� ° —^ No � �°•re+ J� —r Q J S J J O P J J JM •� S l 0 •D � •��l OI9C J 7 V. A.OA .O .G l .96 .O Ss F -1y t C3 Y CO •� �wG C� i �n P � E 1 V..+ is «°- 'e cD 4 m <° v V .•-'c. �a ii`L".. �m c N� 1 �9 Zq VC ^_Ed 4�0 tr ^L c9V y � ^y f� LLN p�'sN .N.d YL G d V T OJ 1x� r V° S P q L L 0 •O •� j G M_ L° N N N « V P ~ .L'• u i U y '^ gi�a°id 0 =l S^ MEN «C aV C f i; p— O —p4 � _O N•q y9` CM Cryry `JN O `V 1 LO 1 Vr C9.. J =O r.Ln NVn.. Eb E� rP`Yn CG �� VV I 1 jt W�4ud 6pp U Lc Jd eL O Oqc O'- O I +! I I 1 p1`J roT L oq -« did oecPa -. o .� o coq •e dr or a- �o� coot t r c c ' � q` � c •e n -- r � d a EE d O JIE °C Gd °� To PVO d N c.°.•^ ..� oa y 115 O V E x+00 VO bJ < d r ^ � q' � c E `• - ° c. ° L c .L. u ari Li. q � � L 1 v L lrr er NL_ V v Oc V9rr� O.O .J —e Y O -J I qC.O O NOO C «CNN yqC' ~ 6• LN�` O= ^ OOU R L mq dr �e L an n�a ..•s — Lr ,5 9�` •.qq MNO` v O T « � n y u r .- r S 50- ° E � r C _ E O r M y V C N C 9 V r[ a ng 6c �.' PN -V� n,�.N. .d. vau •d•= N{ N.«i. a °^q N OqN N ^9 `uO dr CVO OL` C4N V d ^r .Nr =e P> a;ry oP�o �L � � cN'• E etr.— wN� O L l n 2 Q p N C> O M T n 0 �— +• Y _� C •r i t 4 � V .9 q VN !O <O �O —E —1 ILOda !OV OP•O O e �i V^ `^ O— C 9 • N� `I oI I I 1 r L c O O P L c P C C ^ Ln Em F -1b b m �^ J ^n n ^VJ J� O � 7�1 7 ••1w\J q O b_.K= 1SWKO O �.7 Pi qy �{ =� jK 60 gall .]KA Cdr 6i � q9d JoK � l uP �Da wJ '].O OQ r» Nu �T r_A QN 9 —74 �i •> 'J ^ C S'J J~ � O u C \'' 6 O a j SAN 1 n ^ j µ D � �Q j qr Lvi. 1 If 2 6 OYwC 6QObC !2O 40� n Nu D' KN $ ,tO!ZN 1u wJ.<A r J gnnq'11 K ^S w y O <H�S iry mr a a i'J \O'J'fl SSN O�.N'M � Ni0 n -. nfEN ^N wON J q .T.o Pi R =� �r ^ zz 0 p O n ��z J. n \L n .ur u 1 W n ^N rJ r ouC O J •< A f1 3• l 6 �. n� M 6 ^SDw � S w I — SCn00 P S 60 n ^? O �p,w SO SO'S O ` 6 �Y ^ r CN? .�.• rN� a � I A� S S r rdS. ^NI �.yJO i AA O Ny MC9 ooa AQA yy nA n��n ^ c K ^� Nq O.wJ -Jr K° K 66 q CO, Sb0 (Af rya 6C Iy O� O nAL �b `Sq n NCM q 6n l"f -! q \p n 1p 7 _..�` �� r n O 6 a O r w l n 17 nom, nA A A N? ^ do O 7 b PO • u^ 1 ail CTI 0 60 ^' d AN ro. d0 a O q L J A A q {Q p S J q D N ~n O P N AJ ^ O J_ F -1b A-- 1 n u u d cr 0 L d r p •O K � — Y_ o °G od n i L = C rY •.. yV `OQ Ilk .lW .OrV J OC q0 r V V O T a ^ C w O• y NQ V •.. y � — j u O CC a d r V N C G 2 V NG N'C �C Lqy O Oq CC ' rr G `vq •eMr r •`i.Y `V od d± d00 < dV y.r ... i— dqv o b b •-d t Q t o. e T— e,— q 1.1 N t b C O � qy� 2 � O e =— y a,o C q Oy M O O N V V ° N � G P q PG V •C 6 r C1— a �rC Y d Oq V� d C _ V q �• T a ju q .b ' y�c It c T F — ,1 c f � Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by McNiel, carried, to continue Item , C, and D to the February 8, 1984 meeting to determine if a consensu as been reached among the three applicants as to the preparation of a rket study. If no consensus has been reached by that meeting, appropriat action would be taken at that time to continue the items for four wee With direction to staff to prepare a site specific study. In that even , the Commission would then make a decision on each of the projects in four eeks. If a consensus is reached among the applicants, on February 8 th Commission would recommend continuance for eight weeks to allow a cons tant time to prepare a broad based study, after which the Commission wot then make a decision on each of the sites. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STO , MCNIEL, BARKER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: UAREZ, REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried • ■ f a � %. 10:45 - Planning Co ssion Recessed i 11:00 - Planning mmission Reconvened Motion: M ed by Barker, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to continue past the 1:00 p.m. adjournment time- E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 120 - AMERICAN NATIONAL The development of 121 condominium units on 6.1 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 du/ac) located on the east side of Vineyard, South of Foothill - APN 208 - 241 -11. Curt Johnston, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Staff recommended that condition 2 of the Resolution under Planning Division be revised to state that permanent easement rather than a letter of acceptance be required for secondary emergency access from the adjacent property owner. Additionally staff recommended that item i be amended to include revisions to the end elevations and the addition of treatment such as horizontal siding, false windows or hip roof treatment:- It was also recommended that the upper a story elevations be provided with treatments such as corner windows, pop -out windows, or shadow boxes to create a shadow line. Staff further recommended an additional Engineering condition to require the applicant to acquire a private drainage easement through the adjoining property to the east prior to the issuance of any permit for development. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. ?fanning Commission Minutes -9- January 25, 1984 F-18 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING, DESIGN REVIEW FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE PLAN CHANGES TO TRACT NO. 12490 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF VINEYARD, 3OUiH OF FOOTHILL IN THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 28th day of October, 1983, a complete application was filed by American National for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of January, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission conditionally approved Tentative Tract 12490 subject to revisions to the elevations; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of October, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider architectural and site plan changes to TT 12490. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as fol lows: SECTION 1: That the proposed architectural and site plan changes are consistent w- iith the original Conditions of Approval as contained in Resolution No. 84 -10. SECTION 2: That Design Review fer Tract 12490 is hereby approved. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: . Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy 'Secretary 11 F - lcj Resolution No. Page 2 I. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary cf' the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga., do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October, 1984, by the following vote- to -tvit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: F - ao u u CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1977 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 19, 1984 TO: Chairman and Member: of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Pli.nner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -32 - BUILDING ELEVATIONS The staff report and related exhibits will be delivered to the Commissioners on Monday, October 22. ITEM G a E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1954 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner ten SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84 -22 - HIGHLAND COMMUNITY COVENANT HURCH - The prop-c =cd master plan for the development of a 6,4UU sq. ft. church and two accessory multi - purpose buildings of 2,250 sq. ft. each on 3.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District located at the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Avenue - APN- 207 - 214 -08. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a conceptual master plan for future development and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: For the future development of a church facility with two accessory multi- purpose buildings. C. Location: The southwest corner of Carnelian Avenue and Highland Avenue. D. Parcr' Size: 3.5 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Low Pesidential (2 -4 du /ac). F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G . Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant, Low Residential (2 -4 & sac). South - Vacant, Low Residentiai (proposed Route 30 freeway) East - Vacant, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). West - Vacant, Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). H. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac North - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac). East - Low Residential (2 -4 duiac% West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac:. ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -22 - Highland Community Covenant Church October 24, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant with only weeds and wild grasses indigenous to the area. The full street width is improved on Carnelian Avenue but is lacking sidewalk and parkway improvements. No street improvements are existing on the south side of Highland Avenue. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The subject Conditional Use Permit application is for a conceptual Master Plan for the development of a church facility. No specific construction plans or building elevations have been submitted at this time. The applicant is requesting, rather, verification that a church facility is appropriate on the site and that the building footprints and their sizes are acceptable. At the present time there is one lot, totalling approximately 7.4 acres, on the south side of Highland Avenue between Carnelian Avenue and Jasper Avenue. Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 8735 proposes the splitting of this overall site into two lots. The east lot, parcel 1, would be for the development of the subject church facility. The remaining lot, parcel 2, s planned for a 16 lot single family subdivision. The -proposed parcel 1 appears to be adequate in size to acco;- nodate the development of the master planned church facility, the necessary parking spaces, and also meet the landscaping and setback requirements. Immediately to the south of the church is the prcoosed Route 30 Freeway Corridor. For this reason the Noise Element of the General Plan requires noise mitigation measures b incorporated into the design of the buildings. Because no :!tructural or elevation information has been submitted a t :o,dition is included ,.rich requires that the inside noise revels of the church buildings be reduced to approximately 65 dB. This level is approximately 13 dB less than the expected freeway noise ernittance level. Due to the fact that this is a conceptual Master Plan only, 't is required that the precise site plan, building elevations and conceptual landscape plan come before the Planning Commission as a public hearing. A condition to this effect has been includes; for the Commission's consideration. El E 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84 -22 - Highland Community Covenant Church October 24, 1984 Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed the master plan and has recommended approval subject to specific site design ;modifications. The DRC recommended that the present building layout be flipped so that the main sanctuary is the main focal point from Carnelian and Fighland Avenues. This would put the hardscape courtyard area facing the parking area which would allow for better pedestrian circulation and congregation. The Committee also felt that by flipping the present design a greater separation, could he achieved between the most southerly multi - purpose building and the proposed Route 30 freeway. Other recommendations of the Design Review Committee have been included as conditions in the attached Resolution. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the Master Plan proposal and has recommended its approval to the Planning Commission. The project, in conjunction with the Conditions of Approval, would be in compliance with all applicable requirements of the City and the Development Code. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been ® completed by the applicant. The Environmental Checklist has been completed by staff. Although no significant adverse impacts are expected as : result of this project it is necessary that mitigation measures be included into the design of the future buildings to reduce the freeway noise impacts. If the Commission concurs the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. The proposed conceptual Master Plan, in conjunction with the recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with all applicable City standards. In addition, the project will not be detrimental or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in The Qail Re port. newspaper. In addition, notices were sent out to aTi property owners within 300 feet and the subject property was posted. To date, no correspondence or public contact has been received regarding the project. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAj1O1 *GA PLANNING ©IVISON ITEM: COP 8 #- Z2 TITLE_ LAGArZON MAP uA i. EXHISM SCALE= �6/- y NORTH 0 I ji iiK LI lij PARCEL 2 i\URTH ® CITY OF rrev: Cup 8 #- 22 RANCHO CL'CAMQNGA TrrLE: cemcevl MASMA A-44f w pis PLANNING DIVISICXN EXHIBIT: SCALE. lilt �.. rr PARCEL e ro ARCE L t i .. ��� ... p+ ..... e 1 '1 pw+ra vaiw w ✓r'Mr: r - 3 I ti r r. �" .87BCLo -r -- ' -FiN U.�-,B . iit�9 d4✓iJ �� �, 2[WE: / -L5w r i S.c'/;°/M •rte ✓• -S SH:,FFi.L;; TitAGT I V NORTH CITY OF ULM: py-gz RANCHO O CLCAMO \GA TrrLE:�yM PLANNING DIwLSiaN ExHiBrr -. `G" ALE, W E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be ccmplet<?d by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $37. 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is nade. Upon receipt of this application, the Envi.ronmental.Analysis staff will prepare Part IT of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel "tat ? and CUP ' APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 987 -6434 Highland Community Covenat Church X9 _ Baseline Av mva tic_ 204 Rancho Cncaemon`a. Ca, 91701 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Rev. gilliam A. Enns _ 9330 'Rac l in Re- Ran ho Cucamonga, Ca. 91701 - 987 -6434 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Ascec o Parcel No. 201- 214 -04 Southwest corner of Carnelian and Highland Avenues LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -1 1561,07 l PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 2 Parcel lot split PPrCel_ 1 — HighlanA f`rnr�nini+ -. /OVB (�h rrl� Parr. 1 2 - Futures reci9er{-ial aP1n--1==Pnt ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: _Parcel 1 - AT-)proximately 1.1+ anrPS fir rh„rnh ai4o Parcel 2 - unroximately 4 5 aer a of future '^eciaontial DESCRIBE THE ENC7IRONV=- AL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): J Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. I -2 E c c WILL THIS FR0.3ECT: x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or '—` general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? Horn many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT. If the project involves the construction of residential units, ccmalete the form on the next page. -• CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and info_*•mation presented are true and correct to the best of rsy knowledge and belief. I further u:iderstand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Mw. ,2ST. J931= Sign m ature 4J g-, WTitle FW F 1-3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -22 FOR A MASTER PLAN FOR A CHURCH FACILITY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND CARNELIAN AVENUE IN 1HE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 20th day of September, 1984, a complete application was filed by Highland Community Covenant Church for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of October, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3 That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is issued on October 24, 1984. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -22 is approved subject to tn— eBlowing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The precise site plan, preliminary grading plan, conceptual landscape plan and final building elevations are required to be reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee, the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any permits. Resolution No. Page 2 2. The eventual building design shall be in keeping with the s_,rrounding residential environment in terms of building mass, style, colors and materials. 3. A sound attenuation study will need to be prepared, by a recognized acoustical expert-, to identify the expected noise impacts of the freeway on the church development prior to submitting any building elevation designs. The study shall identify, and the building elevations shall incorporate, the mitigation measures which are necessary in order to reduce the inside noise levels of the church building by 10 dB of the expected freeway noise emittance levels. 4. Prior to the issuance of any permits for the development of the site, Tentative Parcel Map 8785 must be recorded which establishes the legal status of the subject site. 5. The building locations shall be modifiea such that the main sanctuary is the most easterly building facing Carnelian Avenue, with the two accessory buildings and hardscape courtyard moved to the west, facing the parking area. E. Dense landscaping shall be provided along the south property line in order to provide a view buffer from the proposed freeway. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. A dedicated 12 foot easement shall be provided along the entire length of the south property line for storm drain and sewer purposes. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary i„ Ell E u Resolution No. Page 3 Ach 1p I. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary 'of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regu iarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 E H- of Z W Q L d =_uei °'�_ c o c -a c.°.�� °o � .d. s •° y n c �./. c�c c ccc L— M 6 O ��q 3 -VG d i O aCCC - ow Sr u a L W O i 9 6 V 4 g V — q L •O 4 G 0 L W r e O~° q� O � O. � r � 6 E C •i J. 6> V O G n A C C v �� y° q y L q O 4 � °6°�L_�r q =pPY G�yV�V .T° P�rq« Z�V yl�� y'COgi� °Cr9ubi O Q V 9 g p O n 6 IV E2 C« M = —2t; _ N 2 .n O O �O C p L •• C. � O° q V_ d N A N V C� d °- o�.riz��o.` P.�.� c• w- as'i c -MN_ -_` Eo= �`qy c °deco.'. d -4 o�N�N cq qN 6 pV vr^ •a dc-wgN =_ N �P -c °1O N q Ve r\ 9 C P L • -•AC oq od � r V d � F J r4N 991nC °�rV G .O.r O` q Tr q= `raa`i r° Pr. ir�N —wq d°r0 °a.a -aoun cr °.���= ••�• e.°4.�+ ° _om our �'a$ �� C `� _ 4 E C G O c E L U '. C r°i V � r N r r Oa >o_2Y- b pp« V d 4G N — qt M q •_ 9 r LaM �L° 1 ^O rC ? > Izi b 0 6 i N c 0 } O 6 V ¢O � S o i r S N 6 Gi Oil u N St �rC O C y dr PM L V N � � ° •i = L r E ° ° V. N V �• O °l N w J d °O C Cq � >C�VdGrL L b 4 L q V d t] N) C V✓ C l O Nor N L Or O � q — a O r 4�` P LV >•d Va uH J N t N 0 <! 9. C a C i f•L. Y• ..r •Y O ✓C L ^_VY.O b9 V✓ � q V 'JOB �bV daq N Q^ -PO�_Y � atya� aOM C LaV a \��y 06w r ( <r `V =`Gr O ••6 �'w � •� =� �Mf 9 l.ti .°. °CLA a^ = N ^� VAN ^�C .♦ gg069VY Oar l d�✓ .Lr._ w A _ ✓ G C O Q iq O^ L P N? I N✓ z-� O o Aed u.Y✓ `�" 9s =�� o a dy! yr N ° °� :cam ✓ A ,q Fo rL L do c °'•'^ _ +�„ °•'_ wY Y _ ✓� ✓°°. ^EO.L. j.L.r�N `o� J rLq NN ` °ta ^>, ` - oN qaa c d� c LL L�Lla_p�d« T�• a, i. OLS NN rodr >L-�L u��d ✓LrOd ` �'� V L MYL VO.Y^ JCV V 7t�r Y�L = O V VL r r C N E N r L q t L L q O r L `gib p q C C q�N d2Y V�O V ^� L rC �O . p NqM' S Pew Cq�3' cd q LCVrN J���'� -✓!Y ! q V Q.> dr 4°e °LC�a nonJ�° + L L� oE�we ^`C V E ci� V Ci •" N 1 a M Y• r L V Y N •� l L 4. �' Cl N V� L T✓ V ' r ' L M em C O OL E u C v P 1 n C L L ~� d = =✓ L� S � u C C O .T C w Q� q � L N r ✓NOON 9N MC.pLLT P= = °9 V� � VN �q ✓S WO O • 4� ^y a p d t V C^ V✓ L •' E i Ndw V ..' n .Vr. G M L 6 r •OO ° d �• ,M q aG CO ry y✓ =a =0q YbV �' = ^�pO�p C ^.�U_�L✓ZO ✓va ^VV Cr wu r.'pY P.° CYO Q'•rS ✓r OG . y' ! .. f��p tlN O.rAO LGN .Ni�d�O 4✓ J` ` Pr 4 • w✓ �yl < L r w O` C W V V y^ A C y V= M O C 9 L O 9 y p r 9u^ w L` G GY ~V.Or� V �`^ Lq 6>• °N >✓� d ^N 2O O•LnC iG`✓ r°' 9� w CLOD TCi C< r C V S Y j i� 1 4 C� O O. � M O` q r L V u V L `✓ g C✓ .°. ` 9 �O V 9✓ L Z C N C O� C r !- ` O V O w C u 1� N ! ✓ y> V V V V V N P V M !< p V ✓ O! N PL L q C .v ` N V! d✓^ O✓ O p1 ✓�= P L �L •.. � >•6y �P C �+ O- -p Oq✓6 nC ✓r OO C L✓.G^ id LOn� C _ r�Vgyd ^ •� EL Ol .OVE nib O l0 -d • VICY• C' M V P C O t` S L L •f 0 0= b N N 0 ` C= G r G•>°. �Y, .F�a d G 0�� ^VF- O t G .Zw yam. .0.. S OC 606U t✓ <.e r.m Y � N .•f V N .p U C N ]� y! +° a ! Q ✓ C Ol N Y 4 l' d N �r d >.L d O V P b^ v ° A V aL.^ y. `m off✓ ✓a rL� r� Luc ^ ✓r .o c^ � - u L c N uz- c ✓ ud •°.°.- Ncz �^ v ° -rte- cgLN ooLGO O10 C ° uGS � E✓ a b L nq Y °Z o Gael c sL nF.d.i °cr � E e• F"G�LE - •'�.N. gr'4GV ,,Y•,t d .° �V, G 0 G ° w .a ✓ L r � � N C C< C q � q ° VOi .LS x� M -.. roof A'^ ��Nw u ! cdV d °.` ✓� ^`•'c ✓A CJ _w a,�r VN 0 ... �G NL.rw NL`!Y QV�yr NC n C e0y a^ L _O L V NV y 07i t^ O C L y - V 9^ Pq C 6 V P G O ✓ n` J V r. a Y� N C` O a q C �_ r C C r w W P M °� ��✓ w y S G N° O L L Qi b G O C d ✓ C� r T d C N` O P O 9 l N✓ G ° F O 6 w t• V t! y C d �j �° r M d�� y v. V L C a V L° w n _V N O L E✓ ! G � O °Ga ° a.- i t °a A 6 ! T g P� ✓ sc � r t <� °r Tro�C ^f c bN orz o u VC -cc o `-• <: C c �,rc N uM �'yC C4✓ q 'iV 2 ✓L'ir•O .L.r .C,�L a L 9 ! Q n C G° 9 V d L^ •O V C V q O M R- 9 ° p N rl r A`p `J `ySl O1y >. d C aV P C g 6 U S � T t O✓ N X VV l p q O r C !^ ^ C G N T. P q N L O C N u > p J^ V S C L G ° t C G. R ✓_� .° G .� L� � d �� r . V_ r - w ' y � E c C t L c C C •' d� 0= rV 0 °r d C w CL Y O L - _nO iC V P Q G 9 r c<i HE V. •V'. C q V L = °* ✓.✓r.✓ C Vv.TF^C V` 4 °L U L P ^ANW ^L qZJ OpO� Ny - +Uy .y f.IV LZ �rLC ✓L_O✓ NO`r u q Z °L dYY V LV •'L...C•" V `PNrON nY TQ V O •n !- O Y 9 E V 9 ! Y V S C r 6` c .a C `' O O ° 2 '° C. F w L b c c ✓ o y J t c o' °° i c N e^ G c- y c! T o i >-n i c` 10 r J.L/q O.V SAP - ti✓JM° C S wt.� wE t .° k L Q✓ n G Nc -LL cTwY w _- D J b u q L✓ 2 °° A I O y V C O N c V n L_ G °'✓ OL N V ` � l L°` A = _q O ` y J Y Y L O V- V N ^ V q ✓ Z Y w r V c r� O oo a G A d✓d o�.L'.c_°= °_ �d`� T ° >s w i._WLOa o � - °aJV oi°^ C`v j�cq.,o =D "'bu � c v =` Lq✓ «wqe T✓ ° DL � cAd p a r Au e c —a b d Lq ✓ q c` G r j r � �• P✓ V r i p° Y � q N ✓ L°✓ j° AC �wA•+V q° L y6d VON° pd d N WA — O p — rL d°Da Y L ° y �j N✓ L^ L' y r O r O L a N L T p O -I C O ✓r0 W L . T. yneY NC✓ C i � A1r VN G1J Li d q ° w �LdY C .e C r C= V`✓ C P_ 9 i q C _ 'J �- r A _V w_ ° q L'a nMM 4A J`' qW Y• ^� °VN °L L ° � d� N��C 9J�dg0 d y b T. O V. ° V� V >• d C r .r w rD 1 � A C 4 ✓ L ° ^° C C C� TP4>.O.r =�rau W NNO « O N .� N✓ A O" r r L L S� V G � A L d „• S N O W � � L r q M �� ^.nr Y C n ^ C OdSrJ V° CV <� Ian b d 6A�06 6 V �OOpN Ny 3J- 2Z O.5 dw °C O�c L d r n w 10 w` O qn0= =E OL ALT C A� CO n r g C n C r p ° w y L N c V 0 L a=.5 O d M V y L` A C w L= 5 ✓ Y � $o N .y .✓ n.-o «a.r A�r i..ao Y cY o. �^ ^N of _c M ✓^ Eraew°o, o�N � � °°e e� a Mcr �° Ap C� �� LY. mN lyO� CWn ��C v A C/WCV'L ° r` q✓ N rj w LC DNY� ✓�° V 25 _ .L...9 L C AC M q D « N C> C r _ T Ge;C gOe9 «Ve Cyq ..Np r n 6 iyC V L O. ° V `ON v ° 12 V ✓ V O n `= C L Y 6• q r C C L L Y .Ln n L N V r = A ft t d L D P g c V V M O c n L L N L L C N^ r C iCL L Orq rCaC - W ° ✓VO Cnr -�� r pc <wC w� dV IT 9y L�Dr LTV `✓ Y q q° ✓_ c A n r v c O = c OL P✓ p G M d t^ �� y p L q° d — A V � tcj= l��Y q rOw AV YJO N l>.L.r CLO� AVN�. NtA TqY V' AV « q C. d C N O A r r A V L N N A 1O b O 6 °° c° « pN I O^ v A Y VOA +1A �>. °V° rd °^ L° ✓° 9 j � AVM la• 4w CVIY� rY Twd c VO C N pdL EC p L`M Lry lON L1 VL� .5yNY . r �M1 .� LY D �V G - q V N V L y oV 2 i d w a✓ ✓ E Y^ � D d r N L LG r J S El 0 cn d y/ � qV _rP V -I�>• q r0 9 �rC y VYG PqO _ C_OY Cn l'a CG S P— .4C � ^o4e °st 4 °co �c c O C O b�4 r •• V V O. � y O� V _c •� Vw O Q V VV Y r— � q � m 7g� Is Cc Ica Qib a r i�� 'n Oi V O S CI te r° O. d y y =! r V` F.0.0 Z q ha •• Up Q cP iOyEM qy C� • tiM �� Ely 0 00 C M °� C� 7�V L •~ O =q�` bG0 O O O 4 4 N t� V p j O 2 M Y q 1 u u r C O r q p °r ue �$� u i• r.-. o>y J -� a• u - -r'- W d Y v� i 'nC GTi L O p rSi 2 C —qFa+ TpN L .nM V C ` V d _ 9 � ��F a 4t yz ' V zcc' qL q6 .� Tp° y > �' ��a.•n" MF�y� PC u CO'C u ma V° ME d0. ^V' ^^ d G3^ =9O rye WW a 4 4 L C A C C L' OO.♦ r N �' • 'W r .n_' � a i 6G UUC L cC Pi L� �d °•>� O9 Od `^°N0. �wJi =i O l�Cml s =J ° NOS EO d4 o r� e^ ii :mod v�qm a, 4d _e C V '<:q E >= >.e�p a•Fa �� — .�x.�. =y uO .. a° o`Tn;s o Vic= Y "� en dE tt 21°V —..r Pq d�Y °U6J q e a qd � 61 r �£r °L 9 pppG O < V C G Q O. oV P UT Al p[ •p••bVW 7 Ors p. o Lp �� .P °q VO O � 6 m O � W W �Y � I V r C E 2 0 4 u V + ZE-5 _ 9 VC rq�6 L` W1 OCCU9 � ••'C 'nu yJ VVPV C9 va�rd- �� w -••- ao cp -� � -yyq` �S a dq�yV - v _e w i d •Tr =x Yi OVA e` O T' V EO L° `w 4.w C. w P'ry V b C qty C^ Ma ^ Y ^ G V>• • O d V} Cc 9 V° •n i q u r q r V V M O J L ° m 'n 9 -� � l q u N >�NW = y•O P dCC �iL Cu lw P`y� w a O -qy O VL -J -y OCUq y� •CE ` `_V rqQ q -VrJ V1N V O_ O m� r d y/ � qV _rP V -I�>• q r0 9 �rC y VYG _ C_OY Cn d •I O C O V V O. � y O� V = •� Vw O Q V VV Y r— 7g� Ica Qib a r i�� 'n Oi V O S CI te r° O. d y y =! r V` F.0.0 Z q q 0 yyO. S •• Up Q cP iOyEM qy C� • tiM �� Ely 0 00 _• °� C� 7�V L •~ O =q�` bG0 O O O 4 4 w 9� t� V °r ue �$� ': � r.-. o>y J -� a• - -r'- W au °co° v� i 'nC GTi �yi6 C rSi 2 � ✓ —qFa+ TpN L .nM ��F e_pcp` r4 zcc' •n q6 > �' ��a.•n" MF�y� a O O � � O a 4 4 L C A C C L' OO.♦ r N �' � r .n_' C li _T 4 q C cC Pi u i C °•>� C Od �Or ^r_a =i O l�Cml tOgO� NOS EO d4 o r� e^ ii O C V �- >= >.e�p a•Fa �� — .�x.�. uO .. a° o`Tn;s o Vic= Y "� en V 1 u G i 0. u O � r 4 O < V C G Q °` f iv� M L� L o O � 6 m O � W W > 4 O � I V r C E 2 0 4 u V + ZE-5 _ 9 E 0 Ln C C` T O Ol��y 4 qr �qV '• °p .CJ 6NC�y w Lp 4C L ° � • CAI r V qT =� LCN� Z�_V8 yYq ce �•'C9•yp aq o a i Mvo .4. e. ,� B 'n C � Vd^ in V yLrN �cadi= Z a WwE O V P � 9 Y�j J yV q Q O w C °•> PP v T�� PO L L = CSC e✓C� 9�y R 22 ViSr C °•r a E R v c co v2� aw _ •9 N L Mw�o a _ =y VY_Lr C L � 9= Opa CL_rLq r �• u4 q C O C 9 r ^ L T j r q 6 L q« � � y..p V t c T`rP hY vS d l «CV Le Y G� O LLT V VVr '�L O C =O VLL�� E C • J ^ 4ytL a v 40 .•4.S + •t -O�^ DvO... dr d em 0^ 4« r ° t w v L r CV � �,' �,�adi q CI Y L Cr l p° «VE t «iO�'. 6O �O G V p.9 ay T V C G 6 V Y O o o ° m = ? •. pC a�o� = .._Y.e� IL Ee q�yL < na�pP d° i ^ONgr° � Q.'i � LC . >O i•�p 9POj a 6 C q V C gOOL O L E 4 y E d q_ YzVjC 2� y c c NVVN— °,OY q dr V V6laV <OCC > YM VO Pq O Vim_ iT 9, 2:5° a '�= L TY± CO w�y �r C I « O• =�M yyC.—C I C C C C. d. r C — uV■ V r Od Y }OO =•Vj C NH ` ' drJ a i F.I` EI •'pPN Z_ Cr Vq�VE p L p < V.L.• W f V NpL L L N < M N E 0 Ln C C` T O Ol��y 4 qr �qV '• °p .CJ 6NC�y w Lp 4C L ° � • r V qT =� LCN� Z�_V8 yYq ce �•'C9•yp aq o a i Mvo .4. e. ,� B _Na`I�o G in A• Z2 �cadi= Z a WwE 4N m >.° V P V 9 ' P Yz G 4 p« Q O w C °•> PP v T�� PO L L = CSC e✓C� 9�y R 22 ViSr C •9 _ =y 0 V C L � 9= Opa CL_rLq r �• u4 q C O C 9 r ^ L T j r q 6 L q« � � y..p V t c T`rP hY vS d l «CV Le Y G� O LLT V VVr '�L O C =O VLL�� E C • J ^ 4ytL a v 40 .•4.S + •t -O�^ DvO... dr em 0^ 4« r ° t w v L r CV wN �,' �,�adi q err OU L Cr �p p° «VE t «iO�'. 6O �O G V p.9 ay T V C G 6 V Y = ? •. pC a�o� -'e�c .._Y.e� °LvOm_vc Ee < na�pP d° ^ONgr° � Q.'i � LC . >O i•�p 9POj a 6 C q V C gOOL O L E 4 y q_ YzVjC 2� y NVVN— °,OY q < OO Op —E ^L V6laV <OCC > YM VO Pq O Vim_ E 0 Ln C { 0 Z L v d O L 6 2 ILI �F V V L d4b .nd • Y Y �I L ° r V r >Vl ` -_ L L �• Z ✓ T° ° V Or- Y^ I w o P O 9a0 C• � L L 6 ^ V N ^ O• 6 �F6u u V a C C q L V 9 ♦l O ND✓ Q D N✓L u T ' Vy O q � ✓W d Wd� m W�us` ggOV u l a �• N � G G O ^ G _ 9 T 6L ° �vu ` ✓� CJ P 9 N 3 V W V 9Y i , ✓� G V G C ^` a> i � < Q C w i c - O >• p E 6 W at `� " LW OV <�i y � c V o.FO C i ^ a N• C = V NG C Z W G ✓O C � �I J R "� c n c P oo y M V•r V a zji� � EL N q ✓ S O ✓ 4 i O j_ N O G� .^.. g Y x 4 T C P✓ Y O V L � V T ✓° n a n T N 4 L R L C � _ pO. 4� C Y ✓pt Z C V V t -✓ q a J oL t° •'° to p� � V- ✓ r �' � ° Lv °a � V ✓� o 4 W N P r O _ L J _ E V r t^ c `��$5 a �— n� — W•°co a � °M cTu 2,Z:9 ✓ Vw �L -V V e �'N N L pOV 06 CJ L CE, q r� S✓ y STa _ G V� -4 � V 9 G � � y 6 t L � 4� L ✓ c • r V U i N V _ W ✓= g O �= E- V� V > ✓ Sy L P N V q M.- 9 N ° •p W _ W �_ __ V C T� Y L GGV6a � r � 6� W✓ G V i 6 V° C �° iC0 O O P ^ ✓ < .-• ._-• ✓ - .mow .N.. ✓ G L V E O �•� j•C��� 9 L r� °4 �° - u c n c i - v V E V c e V� V C d .nd wi�V Y Y �I L ° r V r L ` c L L O O O O ✓ ` .L.. L�° . ✓ I o O PV d T _ S L L 6 ^ V N ^ O• 6 �F6u u V a ° p O O V✓ M V 9 ♦l f✓ q d C D T ' Vy O I � ✓W d ggOV ✓ G G � YN T 6L ° �vu ` ✓� CJ P 9 N 3 W V 9Y i , ' LAN NL .°o � < Q c - O >• q P E 6 W at = � V u 4 V � c V •n C i y a y C = V C f C 4 W G ✓O C � �I n c � w oo y M V•r V a zji� � N q ✓ S O ✓ 4 i O j_ V C d .nd wi�V Y Y CWV L ° r V r L ` W V L L O O O O ✓ ` .L.. L�° . ✓ I V O PV d T _ S L L 6 ^ V N ^ O• �F6u � ° p O O V✓ M V 9 ♦l f✓ q d C D T ' Vy O I � ✓W d ggOV ✓ 9r� � YN T 6L ° �vu ` ✓� P 9 .✓.•DROP .j W OO 9Y LAN NL .°o � S C O >• q P E 6 W at ✓< � ✓ 4 V � c V •n C 06 ^✓ y O Z y C = V C f C 4 W G ✓O C � n c � w oo y M V•r V G q ✓ S O ✓ 4 i O j_ N O G� .^.. g Y x 4 T C P✓ Y O L � O T ✓° n V C d .nd wi�V I CWV L ° r r L � O O O O ✓ ` .L.. L�° . ✓ I V O PV d T _ S L L 6 ✓ C q• VCC✓ 6•� �F6u � � T ' Vy O I � ✓W d ggOV ✓ OCy ° C ` ✓� P 9 .✓.•DROP .j W OO 9Y LAN NL .°o � rY i L •n 06 ^✓ y V ✓� V T VLG•' ✓ 4 i O j_ N O G� .^.. g Y x 4 T C P✓ Y O L � O T ✓° n a n N 4 � pO. 4� C Y v r✓ q Y V Y V q q y O p� � V- ✓ r cTu 2,Z:9 Y L E U • Gz4 c • ° d O r > Q T.L.• V O n� GGV6a � iC0 O P P ✓ C G L V E O �•� j•C��� 9 L r� °4 �° - u c T• � -- � e - � o a� a ° ` Cc ✓ c i C V✓ s � �'� V> r 4 o V F LN- 6 V .`.ice -o NpW < D.• ��sc .L.r ° 6 .°. NO ✓.� N°L '• ^� ql �I it � y C-1 0 w V 1r A Lre r J 9 r ' r I mr6 d= z .. 1 •' T O Q S I I C 9 S- ` <} G cy ' oN.o i � C Y i L ac L 4 �wx = 6r a mm m O w J i _ L T a m • J c n � C-1 0 N ^PTV a q9 C rw 4 Yip Vet M = r- N° - V V -j w D, r •• M d ^ N ` N 4 V O ° r w 4 L v T V°• < a rY 0Y 9_C WIC q �> w0. =Y V ^� 40 4 O 'n °• o =w M DY Vr F O } j! OV < N� day E YP }d CSC �O^ NY Off' rY S'^ MN JV V� L9L r v K V 0.0 « DLO OL • <d ^ Y<l < O <w - V< f r V} W % 0 M' 4 < G • C-1 0 E L] CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1.984 - TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8785 - HIGHLAND COMMUNITY CHURCH - A division of 7. / acres into 2 parcels in the Low 2- duf ac Residential Development District located on the south side of Highland, between Carnelian and Jasper Avenue (APN 201 - 214 -08) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A- Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose: To divide 7.7 acres into 2 parcels. Parcel 1 is the site for the development of a church on tonight's agenda for approval as C.U.P. 84 -22. Parcel 2 is the future site of a tract development. C_ Location: South sida of Highland Avenue between Jasper and Carnelian Avenues. D- Parcel Size: Parcel 1 3.53 acres Parcel 2 4.17 acres total acreage E. Existing Zoning: Low (2 -4 du /AC) development district. F_ Existing Land Use: Vacant. G- Surrounding Land Use: North - Existing single family homes. South - Proposed freeway right of way and existing single family homes. East - Vacant land. West - Vacant land. H- AW'- u1 - LUB \L -'i UU /QL. South - Low (2 -4 du /ac East - Low (2-4 du /ac West - Low (2 -4 du /ac Development District. Development District. Development District. y ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcei Map 8785 October 24, I984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: This site is vacant, sloping approximately A southerly. II. ANALYSIS: Highland Community Covenant Church, owner of the site, is requesting a division of 7.7 .acres of land into 2 parcels. Parcel I is to be used for the church site which is on tonight's agenda as C.U.P. 84- 22. Parcel 2 is the site for a future residential tract. Off -site and drainage improvements are to be constructed at the time of individual parcel development. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field in-estigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMEENDATION: It is recoranended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 8785 and authorizing the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study X —12, 11 L E , t ` =alit I i et z t T o � ^ 1 ,t? 1•.E _ - _ - _ eE•�ege' iota. I: t •� 544 t t t tt • j 1 7'EItT1:T7VE >ampKZ �uGal ERCeREERtrG C0. __ "��y y- E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Revie. Com=ittee through the department where the project application i.s made_ Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff wail prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 13 The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel '_°fan R- ,,Wand CUP APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 9R7 -9414 Hiv_hlsnd Communitv Covenat Church Baseline 'Ave-n- 4in ono _ :tanrho ( „camonc a 91701 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Rev_ ••;; i; m a Enns _9130 Baseline Rd. Dancho Cur- nnonga. Ca 9170! - 987 -6414 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Assessor's Parcel No_'201- 214 -nA LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -1 -L` PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 2 Parcel lot sD1it �i`17rn1' Parc 1 7 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Parcel 1 - Annrcy .r at�1 3_5 4 Parcel 2 - Anoroximately 4•5 acre,; of f7,a, 11 ♦cci�- i DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORI;^.ATIO':d ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROP?SRTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTUAE5 AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) :_W rinimat lire is limited to rndents and corrnon1v Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. I -2 S -6 al E WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial chance in demand for municipal services (police, €ire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes i, the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? ® Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: I£ the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required fcr this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date1 9jtj Signature ® Title &,,,,-,,,, T-7 I -3 RESIDENTIAIL CONSTRUCTION provided to the ,f Rancho Cucamonga The following information should be p- of the school planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ab -Y district to accommodate the proposed residentia.'. level - &melt. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: 1. Number of single fasily units: 2. .lumber of multiple :fa_,ni1y units: 3. Late proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: model # and # of Tentative 5. Bedo?� Price Rye ng,ASE I PHA S E 2 PHAS= 3 z -S I -4 PHAS 4 TOTAL 11 RESOLUTION NO. ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8785 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8785), LOCATED ON THE SOUTHSIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN CARNELIAN AND JASPER AVENUES WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6785, submitted by Highland Community Covenant Church and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the scuthside of Highland Avenue between Carnelian and Jasper Avenues, being a division of parcel 1 of Parcel Map 6761 recorded in Book 67, pages 91 & 92 of Parcel Maps, records of the County of San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, on August 10, 1984 a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on October 24, 1984 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent wit:? the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitatle for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued cn October 24, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8785 is approvad subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TlIS 24th DAY OF October 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Amok Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hareby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, Fussed, and adopted by the Pianr.;na Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamona,t, at a regular meeting of the Punning Gammission held on the 24th day of October 1984 by the following vote -i:r -wit: AYES: COMMI',SIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: X -iv 11 11 11 CITY IF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMEENDED COi!DITI (M OF APPROVAL LOCATION: South side of Highland TENTATIVE PARCEL 19AP: 0785 betwaen Jasper and Carnelian DATE FILED: August 10, 198.4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map NUMER OF LOTS:_ 2 6761 Recorded in Book 57, Pages 91 & 92 GROSS ACREAGE: 7.7 of San Bernardino County ASSESSOR PARCEL NL: ?11- 214-08 * �c�t*; ts�t*** r�4�t *,rt *irzt�- :t ***ic�nE�r�x,t ** xt # *r:ic&,t** +,F*atir�iriiiir�t pl : s N O. ENi= J%EERR /St9RVEYOR Highland Community Covenant Church Ana,.alE:gineering Co. P.O. Box 602 SAME 190') E. La Palma Ave.____ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Anaheim, CA 92803 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance Kith Title 16 of the Menicipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Acces: 1. Dedications shat- - made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessar; �-nents as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feat on additional feet on _ additional feet or 3. Corner propertj line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C.C.sR.s and shall De recorded concurrent with the map -1- i 6. All existinq easements lying withir future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineatea on the map per City Engineer's requireents. is 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be poster; and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to building permit issuance far individual parcels. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording va the map for the following: X 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -sit drainage fac'lite:; necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to issuance of building permit for individual parcels. Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may inter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordatijsi of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, br:_ not limited to, curb and gutrer, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive arproaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Pricr to building permit issuance for individual parcels. Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street A.C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other Carnelian X X X Hiahland X X X X X X Jaseer X X X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigatioi; on meter 9 -2- _7F_� -1'A- X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the C,ty Engineer's office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of an power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate str =et name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be reproved by the Southern California EOison Company and thi City of Ranchc Cucamonga. Lights ;hall be on decor..tive poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irritation plans shall be submitt =d to and approved by the Plaininj Division prior to the issuance of building permit. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Urder:idewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage any Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall bt required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map - 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the preperty from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project sh411 be submitted to the City EngineC.- fnr review. 5. R drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- - s -y3 Grading X i. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with i.ne approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report steal' be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for app -oval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals J. Permits from oti.cr agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans . -or San Bernardino County F1cod Control District X Cucamoi:,;. County Water District for sewer and water San P'!rnardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. 3. Provide all utility services to each iot including sewerage, water, elec'.ric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary -ewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from ali utilities and other interested agencies invol,!cd. Aporovai of the final mar, will he subject to any requirements that may be received from them. -4- = -;y X The filing of the tentative map or approval of sane does not guarantee that sewer treatwent capacity will be available at ' the time bui Ling permits are requested. When building permits ire request.., the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. S. Local and toaster Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deea. used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Prior to review of any development plans for Parcel 1 and 2, a sound attenuation study must be prepared by a recognized accoustical expert. Any mitigation measures required by the study which will reduce the inside building noise by 10 db of the expected freeway noise levels must be incorporated into the design and final development plans for Parcel 1 and 2. i( 12. A 12 foot wide easement along the south property line shall be dedicated to the City for storm drain purposes and to the Cucamonga County Water District for sewer purposes. X • 13. The curb to curb width required for Jasper Avenue shall be dependent upon the water carrying capacity needed to protect the future development from storm flows. CITY OF MHCHO CUCAlDKA LLOYD B. HLIBBS, CITY ENONEER by: -5- CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA STAFF R'EPCICT October 24, 1984 Planning Commission Lloyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician IMPROVEMENT COW-ANY- A division of 331.02 acres into i4 parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial area (Subarea 9) located on the south tide of Arrow Route, east and west of Milliken Avenue - APN 229 - 111 -23. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Retested: Approval of Parcel Map. B. Purpose To divide 131_02 acres into 14 parcels in the Minimum ;,matt Heavy Industrial Area (subarea No. 9). South side of Arrow Route, east and west of Milliken Avenue Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 6.2 acres Parcel 2 - 9.8 acres Parcel 3 - 15.4 acres Parcel 4 - 14.4 acres Existing Land Use: Parcel 5 - 6.8 acres Parcel 6 - 6.9 acres Parcel 7 - 6.9 acres Parcel 8 - 7.5 acres Parcel 9 - 8.9 acres Parcel 10 - 4.4 acres Pdreei 11 - 5.1 acres Parcel 12 - 9.6 acres Parcel 13 - 8.2 acres Parcel 14 - 8.2 acres Total iiet Acres 118.3 acres Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Area South - Vacant. East - Vacant. West - Existing industrial building and vacant. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8578 October 24, 1984 Page 2 H. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - General Industrial Plan (subarea No. 8). South - General Industrial /Rail Served Area (subarea No. 10). East - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (subarea No. 9). Nest - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (subarea No. 9). I. Site Characteristics: This site is vacant and slopes southerly approximately 2 . II. ANALYSIS: The owner of the site is requesting a division of 131 acres into 4 parcels in the General Industrial District (subarea No. 9). Specific development plans have not been submitted at this time. All parcels meet the minimum size established by the Industrial Area Specific Plan. In general, all streets shown on the reccrdation of the Parcel Map, except Blvd., which will be bonded by a 1 south of Jersey Blvd., which will be from Seventh Street to the railroad e project. It has not been decided whe the railroad, however, the developer f the worst case. tentative map v,�ll be improved upon: for the Street "A" north of Jersey ien agreement, and Milliken Avenue constructed along with the portion s a future city railroad separation ther Milliken will go under or over ias provided enough right of way for III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part li of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a fieid investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been complete-n. BE E 11 Ir PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 8578 October 24, 1984 Page 3 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommE ded that the Planning Coi:rnission adopt the attached resolution conditionally approving Tentative Parcel Map 8578 and authorizing the issuance of a Negative Declaration. lly submitted, LSH: Attachments: Map - Tentative & Vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study `�. 3 �rE�T�iT /VE Pa,¢C4C1. Me 8578 .N TNC-C /TV OF ,',�A.VCS/O �;/Cte+ONGI, COavTV pF .. /N BLJN /1C /NO_STI TA pa CILSpQ.v// LiarL /lJ/ (iLfl6q AOd.of..rual• zxjl"O /s Pw le'ca 490 _ /eases ii4LJ /MJONO40 SC:(wp �cyfGL7 /N6 �ia•�.; fvOLVllll 6vl (LVO J�:rN6x�1 car.>.v..: E•.,.� a rFa+.r/ YN Ow..•u /Suawrrura: Pi w.vim .W T.p u' nrt Oi' /b U.dyy� /,aN°p�aylri ESN �• �r�.� S /MI /L U.VO AM /IbY/./ /MTCSf M /LLIINJOY lM�IY>/Y/O Losf YLru Jne4 4^'•Y' mwra( /L <t �� LW1GL>JV6 f1q[ IMiWLLEf - .OUO UAIa JUa✓w vlaJ msr �frn/w. ,(�.we(uav 1 y, Y r•+' t. ry snr °`I NOTCS: li/frifo {lrrwv - /fonlrr,,•c I � � � I 2 OCwY {,{m lljfar y�.yrrJ ?rlwff .1MNA, �ayy�,fl LburLY/>iK Ak'v scsNS .o liar ai•nree..le m asr em•ermraY �.. i I S >kK•.fWIVV /AR 64fR /.Cf !' r IK� � /YL �r //LL F.1'L' I(C J /•_R.t✓aVl roOK• >.b'aflfJ 6�lJ!['dIIJZYNM r <C 4W]/GVD M /AM. JYHLV /Q.G'�- k � I d /f/w .[� 1 I ! fKwTOi wlr Cwp'RMwY.•T d ALL {d.aFlCP.� ABG AIYR�J/'Lb ar rfl CJtY CVFVCC.( I I --- -- ---'----- ---- -' L- --- I ------ ---- -- -- - - -n A2eow -----------------------=-- 1m U p!j zs I I fe•,.>�,. 1 � �x I - � � • SO I 4 v 5c I p a5 as I a. \ ,~•. I lnacrtP Iwrtei(e rteae W" >rs"71 d7 aef > ryac• atae: I 1 v 95 Y / N ~• I a - I I I I L'Clr i. 0 o'v PFRtc z .2 1 P11RC BD acs / ..= 11 • / ..mac •-.a�� / 25 _ I d d/ >LL //lN / (• 60. zz zz zz w• E E E ,/LI16r QLOVlfI/�p %' SrIC(�- .r/ w f/iu P/ ( �7 er "w ul NE FIV r 1•.� `.ewr• = PP.OLECT i rwN r 1 . 7P YYOwaY r wDWN t]' \TO F-. ITY OTr RAI�ICHO CCJCAII�NGA title; P.M. 8578 ENGINEERING DI-11SION VICINITY MAP � 5 ,L �I page rn ' I=' RO.w. 0000 MNYVwI L� 1-7 NMT ® tOR N.O.w. 000* iNYab /� 4 nKYN rOMY 80' a Mn> RQw. \ /V1.�eY�J MObt�et Y�C1 -Il.n Fp—i ♦ ran $CNVICr iNN4 SIIMKNa/ s + + fYY itaueel a T• NOIr OKYI YNf NC MN CN1quYlbm YIY alMlwn N NOb.YU1Nw MY. wDWN t]' \TO F-. ITY OTr RAI�ICHO CCJCAII�NGA title; P.M. 8578 ENGINEERING DI-11SION VICINITY MAP � 5 ,L �I page CMCUL.TION TNl45iNOlr,[i I=' RO.w. 0000 MNYVwI L� 1-7 NMT ® tOR N.O.w. 000* iNYab /� 4 nKYN rOMY 80' a Mn> RQw. \ /V1.�eY�J MObt�et Y�C1 -Il.n Fp—i r�l ran $CNVICr iNN4 SIIMKNa/ `r -i-�+ [.M1l�ni �wir�M L4�CKOwN fYY itaueel ++��•. RNNnU �.^�.r GNYY � Cnwwb T• NOIr OKYI YNf NC MN CN1quYlbm YIY alMlwn N NOb.YU1Nw MY. Tl.n VIN aNn�n nny rt,N M cv.wMN wIN! M N IM INalew M1Y woY411Y. Ti NYten CI ytn W N uaNHbw N n MalnctnN Wlvn �N 1!M tiI N NY�YriawYn WINt N Nr CNY d^aWK wDWN t]' \TO F-. ITY OTr RAI�ICHO CCJCAII�NGA title; P.M. 8578 ENGINEERING DI-11SION VICINITY MAP � 5 ,L �I page ( C CITY OF RANCHO CUC�.ONGA . INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring Environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. 17-Le Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10; da r before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 13 The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filer., 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further inforr,.a- t1on conce_rai ng the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel %tap No. 5578 -1l PPLICAN -iIS NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Santa Fe Land Improvement Company, 5200 E. Sheila Street Los An¢eles CP. 90040, Attn- Mr. Phi! Warrinoo mac. =- NAME, ADDRESS, CONCERNING THIS 17782 Slv perk Ri., TELEPHONE OF PER£C.N TO BE CONTACTED PROJECT: Williamson and Crhn{i LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND AS:.:SSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESS.kRY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Tentative Parcel Clap Approval I -1 11 11 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentatit•e Parcel `•tan to create !: -elc ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING ANT) PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: t;(1'_ +.crc <c tin h::i!din ^s on <i'c DESCRIBE TFX ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INC?•r7DING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY E.:.STING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The nrciect sitgy�_relati.vriy flnt. .niformly slnninm from North to Is the project past of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually s.-aall, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 51 �I}- 2 -7 W r WILL THIS PROJECT - YES NO Create a substantial charge in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial chance in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substance flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present tLe data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct_ to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development ReVSew Committee. Date Signature�ft, Title Rcbert C. Sundstrom I- 3 S RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The followin5 information should be provided to the Citv of Rancho Cucar,.onc_a Planning Division. in order to aid in assessirg the ability of the school district to accosmodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location. Of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PI-U S? 4 TCTAL 1. Nusber of single family units: 2. i4umber Of multiple family units: 3. hate proposed t.) begin. construction: 4. Earliest date of O:CUCancv_ Model 4 and a of Tentative 5. Bedroo=,s Price Rance 0 I -4 RESOLUTION NO. Aft A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER. 8578 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8578 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW FTE, EAST AND WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map `umber 8578 submitted by Santa Fe Land Development Company and consisting of 14 parcels, located south side of Arrow Route, east and west of Milliken Avenue, being a division of a portion of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 7, T.1-S., R.6.W., San Bernardino Merridan according to Government Survey; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 1984 a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tencatiive Map; and WHEREAS, on October 24, 1984 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, ThE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: 'that the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable *or the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environments impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on October 24, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8578 is approved subject to the recowen a onditions of Approval pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF October 1984 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman r1 LJ ATTEST Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary 1, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October 1984 by the following vote -to -wit: A'ES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COKMISSIUN =RS: O �� 11 El CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: South side of Arrow Highway TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: 8578 east at west of Milliken Avenue DATE FILED: May 14, 1984 Sante Fe Land Impry LEGAL. DESCRIPTION: A portion of the S.W NUMBER OF LOTS: 14 Los Angeles CA 1/4 of Secticn i T.1 S R.6.W. San GROSS ACREAGE: 131.02 Bernardino Merr dan According to Government ASSESSOR PARCEL N0: 229 - 111 -23 Survey. t* irsFx * *r*�HFirtt *1tir�'te� **ici��* k�tl t�tir**, tynt�t* irirl rlr#- h* �4** inFk ,tintfrint,ttA- k *ititiFic#,t *two *,t* k*�tir DEVELOPER MMER ENGINEEP, /SURVEYOR Sante Fe Land Impry Co. Williamson & Schmi,' 5200 E. Sheila Street SAME 11782 Skvpark Blvd. Los Angeles CA 90040 Irvine, CA 92714 Improveotent and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the limited Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular ACceSS X 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -cf -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: 20 additional feet on arrow Highway additional feet on additional feet on X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by C- C. &R.S and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -1- X 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X 1. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for the Parcel Map. X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: "A" Street north of Jersey Boulevard 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map andior building permit issuance. X 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and -cutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights or all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half- section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for the Parcel Map. Curb & A.L. Side- Drive treet Street A.C. Median Street Name Gutter Pvmt. Walk Appr. Trees Lights Overlay Island* Other Arrow X X X X X X X *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter CJ C X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment pernit. X 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other axisting public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lin ?s of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. L X 8. install appropriate street name signs, traffic contr-)l signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 2. Adequate provisions shall be siade for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. X 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer as shown on tentative rap, and provide appropriate easement. X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards constructed to detain increased runoff ;-Ifl -3- shall be Grading gift 1. Grading of the subject pr-perty shall be in accordance with the VW Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of gilding permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CaiTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Centro] District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water X San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C. &P..$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will swe be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. r� -4- X 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same doe•; not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be availer.le at the time building permits are requested. When building :ermits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recordation for and /or prior to building permit issuance for 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. 3.0. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse ca'culations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie r.,tes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Sufficient street right of way shat'. be dedicated for the Milliken Avenue /railroad crossing a:, approved by the City Engineer. In addition, a setback ar ?a may be required on the Final Map for a possible shoo -fly (railroad detour) in the event that an underpass is constructed. 12. Easements, 20' in width, shall be provided along the rail line shown on the tentative map and extending from that line to provide possible service to parcels 6, 7, 12, 13 and 14. _ 13. A pe-ci se plan for the alignment of Milliken Avenue from Arrow Higheiaz, to Foothill Blvd. shall be submitted to the City Ensin,eer for review and approval prior to recordation of the Final Map. Also, the Developer shall initiate a General Plan Amendment to reflect the modified alignment of Milliken Avenue prior to recordation of the Final Map. X 14. A drainage system and appropriate easement shall be provided for drainage from the south terminus of "A" Street. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMONGA LLOYD S. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: -5- 19) CITY GF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1984 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FR0M: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJFCT: ENVIRONMENTAL TENTATIVE TRACT 12801 - DEER CREEK - A residential subdivision of _ lots on 32.3 acres of land in the Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) District located at the southeast corner of Banyan Street and Carnelian Street - APN 1052 - 361 -01; 1062- 371 -01. I. PRCJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The division of land into 96 single family Iots B. Purpose: Provide single family dwellings C. Location: Southeast corner of Banyan Street and Carnelian try e D. Parcel Size: Site acreage 32.3 acres, Minimum lot size 8,150 E. Existing Zoning: Low Residential - F. Existing Land Use: Agricultural G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - Single Family Re— sntial, Very Low Residential South - Single Family Residential, Alta Loma Jr. High School, Low Residential East - Single Family Residential, Low Residential West - Single Family Residential, Low Residential H. General Plan Desi nations: roject ite - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) and proposed public school facility North - Very Low Residential (less than 2 du /ac) South - Low .;csidentiai (2 -4 du /ac) and public school facility East - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12801 /0eer Creek October 24, 1984 Page 2 11 I. Site Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular shaped parcel which maintains a continuous gradual downward slope from the northwest to the southeast. This property contains a lemon grove, which would be removed, and two Eucalyptus windrows. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Toe proposed project is designed with a range of lot sizes from approximately 8,150 square feet to 16,750 square feet. The average lot size is 10,592 square feet. The proposed northwest corner lot, at Banyan Street and Carnelian Street, is designed in accordance with the existing building layout (to remain), this lot would be approximately 37,500 square feet. The proposedi subdivision is proposed in three (3) phases each with approximately the same land area and number of lots. The first phase would begin at the east one -third portion of the subject property and continue west to the middle one -third portion, and end with the westernmost one -third portion (see Exhibit "B "). This phasing procedure appears to be a logical GO progression due to the natural drainage of the existing slopes of the property and the proposed grading, and ease of construction access. The proposed grading was designed with regards to the existing natural drainage patterns (south and east flow). This design requires some cross -lot drainage onto the proposed adjacent lots, with the proper easements. The cross -lot drainage plan has been conceptually approved by the Engineering Division. The windrows running through the subject property would be removed. The maintenance of the windrow along Banyan Street is subject to the roadway desin-n for the south lane. The applicant is requesting that the proposed curb be pieced at a distance of 16 feet from the centerline of Banyan, versus the standard 22 feet, in order to preserve the historical character of the existing Eucalyptus tree windrow. Construction of the curb at the standard distance of 22 feet would require the removal of these trees; however, they could be replaced with a cleaner ,•ariety of Eucalyptus tree. The 16 -foot design would preclude parking on the south side of Banyan which would require a restricted parking designation (i.e., red curb or posted signs). The proposed lots along Banyan do not front on Banyan; therefore on- street parking is not necessary. Ife- Z E E 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12801 /Deer Creek October 24, 1984 Page 3 It is the City Engineer's opinion that both alternatives (16 feet vs. 22 feet) will provide adequate street width for proper traffic circulation; however, some tree removal will be required near the street intersections for adequate traffic visibility. The City's tree preservation policy attempts to save trees whenever possible, but the necessity to remove a tree in order to improve conditions in the best interest of the public is understood. The major disadvantage to preservation of Blue Gum F-icalyptus in the City right -or -way is one of increased costs related to maintenance and liability. The policy issue therefore becomes one of -elative community values. Circulation: Street "C" of the proposed map is designed as a cul -de -sac and Street "D" is designed as a connector street. The roles of these two streets are to be exchanged due to the Technical Review Committee recommendation. This change permits a shorter access to Street "A" which allows for better police and fire access. C. Design Review Committee: The Committee recorrnended approval of the project subject to the following conditions: Architecture 1. The new portions of the west side property line wall should be a combination of rock pilasters, to match the City's surrounding historical rock structures, and block stucco between pilasters continuing the Carnelian wall theme from the south. Landscaping 1. The windrow along the south side of Banyan Street should be removed and replaced with a cleaner variety Eucalyptus tree in conjunction with the proposed Banyan Street design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Those trees which do not interfere with the street design and construction should be saved. 2. The California Sycamore tree should be planted and incorporated at the pedestrian and vehicular openings where the proposed cul -de -sac streets back up to and connecting streets intersect with Banyan Street. 3. Continue Carnelian east side parkway design theme. 10K_3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12801 /Deer Creek October 24, 1984 Page 4 Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and determined that with the recommended conditions of approval, this project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The applicant wilt be required to install all off-site and on -site improvements per City Standard Plans and Specifications, and subject to all conditions of the custom lot subdivision. Conditions of approval are provided in the attached Resolution for your consideration. E. C -ading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed and approved the conceptual grading plan subject to all of the conditions of the custom lot subdivision. Final grading plans are required io be approved by the Grading Committee prior to issuance of building permits, since precise designs and plotting have not been submitted for review at this time. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the development of the proposed subdivision. 40 III. FACi� FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are supported by the following facts: o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development and the proposed single family uses are in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. o The proposed site plan, in conjunction with the Conditions of Approval, is consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for public hearing and environmental review in The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Correspondence has been received from a property owner on Opal Street concerned with the increased water runoff onto Opal Street then to Lemon 4venue. The Planning and Engineering Divisions have determined t'-.at the increased water runoff from the proposed development would not cause significant adverse impacts. �J 10((- ff El 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tentative Tract 12801 /Deer Creek October 24, 1984 Page 5 V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a ?Negative Declaration for and approve Tentative Tract 12801 based on the findings and Conditinns of Approval as recoamended in the attached Resolution. In addition, should the Planning Commission concur with staff's recommendation, the Consnission should determine the appropriate street /roadway design alternative to be included as a Condition of Approval in the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:DP:jr Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Banyan Street Section Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions ��S x ( 1 1 ' S ) I� I l Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamo .ga 9340 Baseline, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 October 13, 1984 Subject: Approval of Tentative Tract 12801 Dear Commission Members: The Deer Creek Company is proposing located generally on the southeast believe that this property contains in a prime residential area of Alta signed the project to preserve some the quality of the neighborhood. to subdivide and build the 32.3 acres =orner of Banyan and Carnelian. We a lot of natural beauty and lies with - Loma. With this in mind, we have de- of that beauty and to further imurove We are presently working on the design of the homes and will be sLhmi:-- ting them for Design Review in approximately 30 days. We will have some graphics available at the October 24, 1984 Planning Commission raeeting to give you and other interested individuals some idea of the home de- signs. The surrounding homes, in the same zone, range in size from 800- 2600 square feet. We are designing homes to fit within `.his range. Realizing that this property must fit in with the surrounding nei"hbor- hood, we have surveyed conditions such as density, setbacks, grade, and dwelling unit size and sstyle. The density to the south equals 3.4 d.u./ ac and to the east 3.06 d.u. /ac. Our proposed density for tl:e total site equals 2.97 d.u. /ac. The rear yard setbacks for the exi;ti -ng hoes along the south range from 15 -32 feet and along the east 20 -29 'feet. :u(- ditionally, the grade of these existing lots were cut lower than the grade of our property. In response to these peririj. ;_er conditi .)ns, we have utilized specific mitigation measures to insure compatibalit• such as the following: 1. Xaintain existing grades along the south and east through utilization of a rear lot drainage design; 2. Create rear yard setbacks greater than the existing homes. Along the south, all but two units (33 & 35 ft.) will be setback in excess of 40 feet. Along the east, one unit is 33 feet and the remaining range from 37 -57 feet; and, i?iE DEER CREEK COMPANY PoSToFF ICE &VX488 A L IN L0KkCALIrORNR.A 91101 E (714) 989 -3323 4 Planning Commissi.,r. Page 2 ® 3. As an extra measure and in addition to the significa.t set- backs along the perimeter we plotted the one story unit and the two story unit that has no second story windows on the rear elevation, on the lots with the least amount of set- back. In addition to the measures above, we propose to preserve the most north- erly row of eucalyptus trees along Ba.ayan. This will require a modifi- cation oE street width on Banyan, hcwever, the street is already -our feet wider on the north side and the total modified width will still be two feet wider than a normal residential street. The City Engineer has indicated that this width is sufficient to carry the existing and pro- jected traffic. The preservation of the eucalyptus implements the Tree Preservation Ordinance and maintains the beauty and character of the property and neighborhood. This windrow has much historical value and has been exceptionally maintained by the property owner over the years. We anticipate that this project will be built in three phases. The first phase is tentatively planned to begin construction in the Spring or early Summer of 1985. We would appreciate the Commission's consi- deration and approval of this tract to allow us to continue forware. Sincerely, Michael D. Vairia Director of Administration and Planning MDV:pas %le' / ' _ _ I � __ —__ -' tea— � , C2•`' ice! - -J �!Yy �_ L ' •. I .I. --_ •�••• .✓ __` -L mil. ��F J ^�� - -_ -r . -i'. / I--' ' �' � q, •��� it '�� ji � � 1 , L O 7 •ji I'd 3Sr. I. i Iz I e` ra --- -- - - - -- _-- - - - - -- -- - -- - -- Ilk _ • ,;fir; Y �'��1,6 a 4 _ -- - -_ - -. _ :�: i�T \� I. ray.: :n..i , \.. �• a ___•� _ .. -- ________ -- -CZ�c i 5 I �I allV I Of IMI��=I pi i 0 v; V 11 E y _ wwa.•u as r:ma , ______:, _- ____________— • 3rto: ♦ -a { I =Ci33o _)i -CZ�c i 5 I �I allV I Of IMI��=I pi i 0 v; V 11 E � 1 \\ I F I� ' �j�j I I i •� I S I ° I '. it �/� t G �j Ill:] i � I Z I : �— � � ( � ' 1- '�•� - I!1 1 1 f i j f 16 =� •i: •' 1 I ' _ '`� 'I V I •sa ' >_I i1 I S •� s2i � 1 a i L aCf!i!i� .. 16� -^T3Tf :I i _ ' v s Y o— __ s -< _ �u ? � •. = ;• <, c. ?�I �!a'; ;,f°• 17M —lo I•'i. V I 'v I i.: i c .. I £ a =] i cy \�, - •ii' . - p I 1 711 4 1 s -777 M_ s '� .$ � araa '. s Gr l y� 1 ' �•:4 .. i a 1 •� 1 Y a 3 ' ' � - O° .133 O Q �� Q i., . i Q� - \] 4I � � `�' �•{ ti:: ° tna 1 ,. .�___j__:. —T �• - :•IL_ -� i ;_ {: tip.;; J J z U c Cv � � � E 111'\ r U iJ i 7 11 . J a tl- al 3•.j• _" J �.�V�.�� ' � � '�' - � II U. II. h. 1 1�^rl � ii[ i I � -ry •, \ . - - -- - - , � " �; ' =? '� � i l _ -- `+•i ��,� ,' vial ____• ^�.. ✓;_. _ —i. }-. /� S1f1� "i � i _ i � _ —dam_' �' I �••I 6 U G `J O J }.� Z Z r 1 E 11 it i a � C Ld -rise - - a 1 Y� I �••I 6 U G `J O J }.� Z Z r 1 E 11 Ll LI IJE �• 33' �/ EXIST. Ase tUG• TI?EE V) z Z r Q cy(. Ir 12' TRACT HWO 12601 MIM MURIM T T SCALE: HOM L = 1 - =10' VERT. 1'= 20' �\ NURTH CITY OF ITEM: 12801 RANCHO CL'C:AM©NGk Tnu: smeEr c= x- ic)A PLANNI\ 11 QkS `1�:AZ'ED 'G QR�"LSI�1 E'tiHIBT= �- SC.ALE�- E CITY OF RANCHO CUC1%MONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review, Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this a for must be completed and subr..itted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. 1� PROJECT TITLE:_ Tentative Tract 12801 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Deer Creek Comaanv 8480 Utica Ave. Rancho Cucamonea. CA 91730 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Michael D. Vairin, Director of Adninistratior. and Planning - Same as Above LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET .ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Southeast corner of Banvan & Carnelian APN 1062- 361 -01 6 1062 - 371 -01 LIST OTHER PERMITS riLC£SSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERP?, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -1 fr -1,2- 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 32.3 acres one existing single familv dwelling to remain to approximately 2,000 square feet. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): This site is currently farmed as a lemon grove. In addition to the citrus trees some eucalyptus windrows exist along Banyan and one northlsouth windrow. the site slopes Senerally in the southeast di at about a 4.5% slope. The site is bounded on the east by existine homes.=n- family the south by the Alta Loma Jr. High School and mot amily hoses and on the north by Banyan St. and west by Carnelian. northwest corner of the property there exists a sin¢le family dwell and some barns. There are no kro;.—n cultural, historical or biologi aspects of this site which could be sensitive, the site has been ue avr lir a, vMv nr fa=int. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which althcuah individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No I -2 U W! PROJECT: v YES NO X I. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? P rtions=ofus us eucalyptus X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or e:cplosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: All citrus will be removed. The Banyan Street windrowis planned to be Preserved if rhr c; r., 91 4.,e -_..._ IMPORTANT: I£ the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for. this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date �j /y2 G Signature Title Director of P Inning I- 3 y ,� 11 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order tc aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Deer Creek Co. - TT 12801 Specific Location of Project: section of Banyan /Carnelian ESTI`JATES ONLY 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to is begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and # of 5. Bedrooms u Tentative Price Range NONE AT THIS TIME PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 32 32 31 Spring Spring Spring 1985 1986 1987 Fall /Winter Fall /Winter Fall /Winter 1985 1985 1985 I -a J� PHASE 4 TOTAL RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12801, THE DEER CREEK COMPANY, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BANYAN A` " "RNELIAN STREETS - APN 1062- 361 -01 AND 1062 - 371 -01. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12801, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Deer Creek Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision on 32.3 acres into 96 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on October 24, 3.984; and WHEREAS, tie City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering ai:d Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NON, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ® Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12801 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) Th: design of the tentative tract will not conflict .&I. any easement acquired by the public at large, visw of record, for access through or use of the ® property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Tentative Tract 12801. Page 2 (g) That this project the environment issued. will not create adverse impacts on and a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12801, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Stanaara �onoirions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Prior to issuance of building permits precise designs, architecture and plot plans shall be submitted for design review and approval by the Planning Commission in order to assure architectural compatibility with the surrounding homes (i.e., exterior and roofing materials, and design theme). 2. The developer shall be responsible to install and maintain the perimeter landscape parkway an Carnelian Street and Banyan Street prior to annexation into the City's Landscape Maintenance District. 3. The appropriate drainage easements along the rear property lines and within Lots 7 through 12 and 78 through 82 shall be deeded prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Carnelian Street east side parkway design shall be continued. 5. The California Sycamore tree shall be planted and incorporated with the Eucalyptus windrow street trees at the pedestrian and vehicular openings where the proposed cul -de -sac streets back up to and where connecting streets intersect with Banyan Street. 5. The new portions of the west side property line wall shall be a combination of rock pilasters, to match the City's surrounding historical rock structures, and block stucco between pilasters continuing the Carnelian wall theme from the south. k-17 11 E 11 Resolution No. Tentative Tract 12801 Page 3 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. A. In order to preserve the existing windrow along Banyan Street, the curb on the south side of Banyan Street shall be located at 16 feet from the street centerline and the curb shall be painted red to restrict parking; or, B. the curb along the south side of Banyan Street shall be located at 22 feet from the street centerline w1d ch would require removal of the interferring street trees and incorporate a parking aisle. 2. Street "C" shall connect to Banyan Street and Street "D" shall be a cul -de -sac. 3. The proposed cross -lot drainage system shall be approved by the Grading Committee prior to Planning Commission approval. BY- Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATT EST; Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11r__/F APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION 07 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATT EST; Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11r__/F 0 v d O i d «CV�Tr�_LN �b NO L� ^>. •JO •C• N � =P OP ��• V V O V V >� > C C O •O ^ L C .• r - C C O G C L C r _' r •e c i O g q L O r � O O L 7 N r V 9 9� V N 06 J M y O ^_ V V 6 •) • O O n • t •J = T Y ^_ o _ _• P d V n O L• 9+ V L ? � V N n . •� V ygvr NL Y� q' nV GV Cd �p " =U r 0 omL. �.d^• .e ° N moon, _ ° r cc v .. v °r ._ -...r o L °�` 6 i '� •y q aTr l C n O C nL 9 M r L r V pp G g b � B+ Cr4 .O CV 6r L. -r LY6 PC"^ ^V VL CV y GT 'c• LLn b °`_-L• muc�a N`c y..0 c'''o ou `J'... ^� �'r ^Ld y V V n m g r r V« r C V V O 9 7 Y0. n 0 a V C V Er A�rd cy O ^u O'Vd rya r� q� +LT f'CN G 6 OlJ9 >LV�NJr'� CV«WL drV V9 PnO =nn IV dL O. gnNC C u g r L r r 2 q c _ C% T L_ u V r Q V •r•' q V- O r_ C J = y g Y O V r E E v r r M= q q t g y V O L r O r V �' L 6l O V •o N C 1 V M .+ V •^ •L t > C O n L �` G N X O ^'_ O N L t!•_ O JS I d OIOr q' y C= 0 N 9 q 0 n w N W~ ~ q N V L g J P q 4 q d „✓ N V 6 O r O O y V W q n` N r 0.� u b n• 9 N ri L� _ L :5 G P V Q T 9 q C O b C �� ^� q C P • N U n c ° N +� yr C N q L� VrJ N ...•OV QO O NqC •. V�� M OU A 6r� C ° JN r �V ^p rC'�G gG ar % L n= dr�ul• _W..i Or b0•�O q Or_'LL•.•r dv\VQ drL y.V nO,r Pr �._„ LGO+ ^LOL g0l0 N_ DO ` G r � L l t w• N L n o�� � N •Oa G V N S� E Y L I O+ a L L= �_ q�Owq•L T� N 9E rOP + °err` V V ••'�Jl E6; TV�6 c_3q uo cc o m+CA a'✓db� > ° °nc Ng J :r .: u m d ° •• o 4 •Le +S ^r._ +O YrL C� N_ ' +6 NV4`VL `CVO �LVNVV •'�`�Cb N L •J O sL+ 9 N�� ••O. V I V d N o Y C V + t M V •Vr O 6+ + 7 r^ T � P n d =.di 4 no i a is .L ova+ Fcuu i + =d.Ld• i S'`b •ne mJ .c-c° uL nu !q °oin �i 0 W_ J Y O O S 6 C O V O Q 0 V C cr:�o EF > n_ r Onood d Oq r O O A b OCd 'SN`u•.. j v �y L c O 4 n� L• G V •r V q �� C C•$� qG y2y�OV r0 .d.91 G LL ( 4. d C b L q r 9 L �1 I � e S� •..• yt L L +n •Lr• C� y 6 V> `� wO' T N 1 V N d ���•L.n O r b r r T n O l d ` l y O O V. N.• u •C G'-� 6 6 NV �M���y> N N YC 2 4 r q FL• q d+ f N g N L r r y .• L H S Z Z ZO F, `u •'a S = J ! r O � � J C n .•i 4 \ I � �n GJ R I I\ ! (V ► 1 V C 1 w.i v m O i d El d C g d P i Tv Y. _.r •u L' d L d d 9 ` r C+POy�OVFd •d..6L lld ACV S d °w pDC LUV J V C G C ^ 6 N^ O l P q � a D 0 Y �rIN .r C.SU UnNOVV Lu4.NdGpwq rD� d N�O =.Ln' CDCC u--J =� O••, =VOV VO y. u.G.. f^' 9 A .r. ANN O N�q� •, OL 9-.e Cq X40 90 du n Jq 9 NyNV tpY u ` � G PO L� J6 pb ydyM�N.Oi� VTONd 6�.'.O QC N•d+ TJ C d d�VC `NY•lL ^.. -:a r r =y.NN > ^= _• ^DD of ^TTT Ncn „oa• oN `c oI✓` `L.°.br O� i n,T �• V TdD <N' � _w° >d O' Y ov c y a d N� ✓ Vi y J d u h d P V^ r= V L d 9 L P nQ C > t J 4 Nc Cw NYE LL c L yjlr d v' T^ N ` C L r O A T d d s N •^ -J C n > N N `G� d qC E =r i.nC Y -�-� n °� =0� �N C� ✓S W`p aN CLq N ^u NC�� -NqN NC LIgC�E �p0 VT NaCOV N90 .^ :eiu NN =Lr „fie c.. -.Vd °r c,. 'O O= E,°.'> °•'gig P^ C�N C'C • z^u D0 CC oNU ^C _• CN�u l � NVJ� N r m_ � CyY .Ji. 9 V d _O O d` O V b .� _• __ J _' G L l u N .d- q l y L a L E` 6 T° P q Ubr u, d °uFy._ cb v p a ¢.1°.V do Nr.iJ. •.T.LE YwVV N{ Cv.Ti. 0�6 �� I OG 6�nV 6r O 6iVm C. u Y �r P V C - •. '- r r pC Our .wY VC 9 O N.C.dyfC�lN OL](JY �.O Cy C= O rNIO urON Lq ua Tr �M ySU vC0 6r C N�bi �VyLgl CCr � QV'O `•7yn °V�Q ^ ° °D NYO � n d. L E.°. •b. e_' y" M' O N<cQ Dp�q N O J c! Vd yP T. NV9Y VC �L- V >d� •Li.Lar 0>` DCp N�cO D6 N qW •N nOCV �C N. r =C)�l PL ^� ° =ro �av dP �' HdC�a'nO ^.oc Y cv N <c °6 coL,. "'e c,.�r Nco —° ac. cr.°.i =i °D WyC a`T 9C •.. CaYO Pa `ZUOa -Q yQ P�� r cN Q^ Yc o -xc NE> Y C_ E L L O q T d O > ✓� �' C q^ G a C n� N u n_ L .e b N M r> M O' l O Y. q L n g C L P C C a C N D C r �- C U •Ji. d C_ V� N a q V 7 C 6 N V L C p u d C .L.. � M== J r d q D O C V ` .O C_> G u� F S _. C C_ ^� • � °j � U -'� C q � G.'• M �� � E � Y P L Q ^ p c C p C O n L ^ b C Z. G CO C •C.. L L O^ C � C C= q V �. G u. V C V P L o •, -J O O r L u p N V T V, N r ' V L_ p� C O � T p d q W �` rT E L9 NLU CC atu y�V N N�� NC .C.. NTN a `C � rt d GO r�C-. dO' oN cG" N' �v 9T c= "i_ ^nom =ND 9Pa> PNdE 60L Dp NO�Nd Oy L• +L OL Vy na C'N VOrjn> O•NV Cr T J p d V 6 V d V L V V pr a q E �.'+9 G422P�t �.C+Y NC N �Gq<N 6 6 Er64 CJ D 2 u V Q L C C] 171 ur r e bn '�rN✓ m o '— o r4E �I o— w r =L� 00 �� �= O VI ITT° rGEVP anV ^ ` `✓L CP'E ° -cc GI au -mcy o' o� s ao �._ ,.o•a CZ Z r.0 Q= CT`✓ CObu r G` �7 �> -_ -q PF a✓ a. °c c__rL =W �'� a.gcq F .L.o ✓m pd rE aE F'Jrr >9 EC d tV'6t d4 V OII. C4V�a O -VV. =CGdV qaq > O _O Nn 4 COQ GV - a✓ V V C n _ a d W V r G a 3 p• CI 6y -_✓ r C� �. � -rpL L d ✓ �L V C n -_ 4 _ _ V S O ^ C =44 G.- a •O.. � ..rr�a OC '�Gn N` N✓ .P� tom! r -av✓i O�N�.O JG a✓ - F� Op r,. 7a �L- N`Ua C G ^ ✓��� Hs ^�� N nN G� a>. NA PVd N_ GWO o °cr"� W ? �N� clo Nv c.r `ooNa ao - �n 4 L•a'. �L.rn P' °� r c .r. L...vb o °gip ra aN E_� C _4 L.r..V c .°. ✓cep ^UWL ljna4N 6�q�p N it `I ✓ 6Vd N WNp WVV �n U=n.t L 6✓ ^I OI sl I I �I W VI m S L O ✓ .r.. 4 V .✓ C d N� 9 ✓� p ✓a c .F .G �L w d^aD O a Cq L ✓� O CC L r Q ✓ c � r d t✓ q l 4 u ^u emu° � ✓�i .. .d. o��a �� m.°. � O 4 Q 6 4 i V• 4 L i d S L V C a F M` O f `✓ � q _ P V V I C E D i N ✓ N 00 PR> > C P✓ r f d V a p N p .n n L d U d �✓ ✓ G V 4 a p C =. _ � F D r' ` w �^ y OL d Oi •` o i O a o q .-. V' U< V V � _ � ✓ G C W u � r 4 F ... C 4..ar. .... Q L V 6 C O G S Cy .T. � O L` M V ✓ = L ==-t ✓ V E 7 4 C O O r a N� �N �-.'o A✓ 4.°_ —4H ^� o° = =` � rL .'•�W L= o ✓ Qp^ nd E✓a ..a —c { <:u ao cam- q • Nd� " •' A `` ro .^4 4 0� t C>.0 c " _/J� CN✓ C �4 y. wa. Y_ rV V.. d.�C .� NF —> E !4 o N d O.. o a ." ✓ :�. _✓e ✓ o ��_ m L ' G � � L � NOQ � L yfV N OC Vn_ O44 NNr,_yVy `. .r. Uy � VCa cc�_ my rn6° so° °mI °w> `� Loco= WG L —om ver. .2 =gi} an Nca'.< —a.o L.o. Q6� OV WfE a E I ! ! ✓'v�4° �� WW OVrV �i'-4 rZ C 1 t ti A d .3 � N ^ t �!NII�;, �! �i _ �i m1 ! I i ri 7r- Z V O C •�V •Li CL Pd P ..vu.`..a q-`�9 Eve'. � q9'• o .°^ .6 cc q ._v .u+o 9Yi1 u_c_ON Eyi'` O c�Va �� rV N yPwO S V O � �`� �4T• O. o Z ° 2 9 V r O V 09 .Vi d �� C eQ rj r 4 a °u rco 6r��°'� „Nn- Nc p �`•".� � 6 ^VSaV I VO I ° V N q�° Pd` E4 L ~ j O q S M �.Vi L V V C V L ". 9 q -'r -82 Z q NN'q S7PP N q dim c °ac �NNry° ar ^N c° C i v ° - e 1 map v ayegr `e NVC� Y >r 4 _ r CJq °V die oO1 Nvr a °w eob' °c s.`. dNq 6L6 COeV ANC Ol C u tl V y N d^ 2'.5 NL ' vI q O 4 N L r N J ' 0 C '°i NLL v >�JC Gam°, rV4GV P y V y -i YC t- G N N 6 N q O 6 N -10 O � l G °t ��PC O° Pr NOr dL yw�T 6A. T 1L dPr_lC NqC r�� qr Nrrq PO QrC] C .°� Oi' 44 '.•tG ' O qN Cw. C dO.�`` SgCi> °C9J N� d cOT° L dqr l r »� OT4g0 V �I ZN.•. r aCO rPe '�S G �V�q CSC CM6'1` V,O = y o daC° N OLLLL N r a_ ` °7 X= NOV �C O C Oa N 4 W ^? OGCO .°i ^ r u V u r 1-2 G V �• O C C L r ti 4 N 2 4 d 6 g 06 6Y .LOF O.N NL] c i. 11 N. E 9Yi1 rV N N S Z ° 2 9 V r O V 09 .Vi d �� C eQ rj r 4 a °u rco 6r��°'� „Nn- Nc p �`•".� � 6 ^VSaV I VO I ° V N q�° Pd` E4 L ~ j O q S M �.Vi L V V C V L ". 9 q -'r •Vw #II q >� rr N q rL_ P r C �NNry° y9 L IC C e 1 map v ayegr `e NVC� Y >r 4 _ dNq 6L6 COeV ANC Ol C u tl V y N d^ 2'.5 NL ' vI q C N L r ' c c o ovro V �I ZN.•. r aCO rPe '�S G �V�q CSC CM6'1` V,O = y o daC° 1 °� 7Z: r a_ °7 X= -�: Go �c� ✓�N.° �.a ^G •� c N cy= r =""' La rK. y`c =q � Pq NM yj JP v Oq c qr V -J .^rG �6`c NV v" v v c 4 w J NL > j < O w r G N < U t O O r S < o• q C 6 u 4 N O I N �• N 6N— 3N0 r II 11 N. E O 2 V V Cj Q i d 0 - C 6' •. P S SOD O C r J =d C 0 d V I{ V r g ° °tyro. .• ° O Q O c IO r r L p V V L L< • ••' uy �p j O I S 'c 'c '- d ° r < N - w 'pi• ! y « C � Y r`e � w L Y zp. _� a ?_ cl•�_ wG e e � ° !°i _ �LO`� nc„ c � D I OS � _� 6'J -••'° rrr WW 2C y 6P$ OL br I I p L q O 0! 1{ t°AO _ <S p b ap P rd C•J �J�M °yI fj� ¢r °l6 <V- 69 <0'L WY tJaq r¢ 6L G � PLC V O 9 G O C.0 Y c O d c T r P� G L = a d --- ` C O O L V G yy V O 5V Y �r Cn _ d O 0 3 P C D D CT r ^ O D w� C- q T_Y V T C P N p L! Zr GOat ? q �yON_ 0'O d tiw i r, tl 5:. r^ C dv =ex to d wD QC vqm� 9 460 � r 4 v c 4L a V � T rq r p =L-'V ° r e S r L C M Yo r O r 4p1= d 9 n L c y O =O D +O O�qP- `00 CGL P.O+� r V Ga,P dL O V D - .° N V V V a i O L O O L O T z •J V Vr,>r LLD Vr?�L P O C L `jz cv j aPe -q c = r O v d U L O V ~ O M T O O• = 6 N E c r• � L W Z z p G°V V O P q a L ° mqf I' 4 L > c ^ C ^ O S C v Y O O L Faw T D N d V p T O r O 4 -u a c r q < p O = q T j v xo Ll l tC1 — N � •^ C L OuL w< q N � M I d-•s —N O � — • Nr q d L P+ R C 7 r .e Z - L ` C d Z l •R Y 4 � r R q S S S •-• e v a N C C u•V VQy N i - C p l'�wU � V V •�'± `G� C_ Ny u•°.. -•> CUU FO L -u. Q •' 9- C G rJ C C 6 O L ° .�.• C C C •• d q` G G q Mr I'Y O�� N V �C' -OJ C r� �� 9 I q r •IL T >L 'v- C O•L.• y�Ol•LU G ON V T I C�V �P NL jC C J LN�`C �= C'C = I) ur •ON - �� q `q` G _ b •a — N N ocd Yon cJ N q pM r S G 6 G -_ L y F r q L d OI ._ 4 � 6r O C_ � M P �• O W C OL 5 v 6 q N •' r l y C. = V V Y U C q u C I G' v- • ° C° C u 9 .°.• d ° L n NU •'° Vq rLCW CN p• = d = N •n r v _• �` J J T Y N u� W I q C L � G. 6 4 J Q q q d d C dL Ga_• C ��� O Cq Vq ` I 4�d ''�°.°• .d.L u q 6�r Gi Wr w.l lV SG V7 wl �7 - I ��.�•. 6GN i'N Jf O p, r ° of auc I L p• . t — W — o i P • ° i � c c T -- r I �' c V N ` C 1 •-`y a L c �- c `p _ q d 57? _ •-• o_� ` d Vu I\ ^ N I � a N° iq N7• 6 1•] CPC iS• �wr N W 1 � f I t C— ^— T � n �. • T r d C •Y V. • 1 C C- _ C L L C V 6 _ Hn W— � Z < u � E ��u .n nu n —° c o :• r .J.e.L.r .rn oL I O G U "7 O C 1 2 .�.. 2 0 t v v a O y+i d 4 C L C` 2 O e= 4 v C N a r V O 4 v d > P.� +c ` L� 0 S � V P Ptr o_ �u C Y Cr � z V S 4 Tt e 4 ° °c P 7 V o C u G ^ y 4 c O O 6 L V ]� c V 9 J � O e Y r O Q r O 4 C a c Y r = Z v °o. V U G Y V ^ p M L 0 Y � e w V ti > M D V �4 A e OZ _ O 2.2 +4^ � � r > J =vd� O p' P 9 7 v e d e � d� a N z + d q O p O O E L P ^ c L + d Sr Y + u J + P — c J � C t c - t eu v= dC C + W O > G- 4 V a4 'A O V. q F_ S w E r� r �J J m `o ^ V r a 0 c O L ` L M 4 �M V 4 4 + C J G � a.0 C V + c¢ �L O V O S ` V J � c � � 2 _ y L G w � c � v V + c i4 da o^ Q S 'e 6 A - + �O _ r i Q Y LD C G� J ^ O d f' yc ° E d L +q vo rc+ V V O e1 cra � r e O C e O 0 v L D. E e� OI r p. O 6 q O C d � we 9 O1 Y O ^� O U) e O L4 6 L e + U O Q v v O G V O L � 4 � a � t G �+ p C r' e ^ V C L i d V t p N! C ZGc I I ' i `uc = \rte I I ti u+ I s • �I cnc+ i ,c c L c •�?( ! I v ., c nu < d I - i I s C I 4CC° - I I 6 1 2 .�.. 2 0 t v v a O y+i d 4 C L C` 2 O e= 4 v C N a r V O 4 v d > P.� +c ` L� 0 S � V P Ptr o_ �u C Y Cr � z V S 4 Tt e 4 ° °c P 7 V o C u G ^ y 4 c O O 6 L V ]� c V 9 J � O e Y r O Q r O 4 C a c Y r = Z v °o. V U G Y V ^ p M L 0 Y � e w V ti > M D V �4 A e OZ _ O 2.2 +4^ � � r > J =vd� O p' P 9 7 v e d e � d� a N z + d q O p O O E L P ^ c L + d Sr Y + u J + P — c J � C t c - t eu v= dC C + W O > G- 4 V a4 'A O V. q F_ S w E r� r �J J m `o ^ V r a 0 c O L ` L M 4 �M V 4 4 + C J G � a.0 C V + c¢ �L O V O S ` V J � c � � 2 _ y L G w � c � v V + c i4 da o^ Q S 'e 6 A - + �O _ r i Q Y LD C G� J ^ O d f' yc ° E d L +q vo rc+ V V O e1 cra � r e O C e O 0 v L D. E e� OI r p. O 6 q O C d � we 9 O1 Y O ^� O U) e O L4 6 L e + U O Q v v O G V O L � 4 � a � t G �+ p C r' e ^ V C L i d V t p N! C E E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 24, 1934 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT -0 - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - Planning Commission- review rr public comments and recommendations from the Chamber of Commerce regarding the interim development policies for Haven Avenue, between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. I. BACKGROUND: This report is provided as a follow up from the previous meeting regarding the Haven Avenue Corridor Study. As the Commission will recall, the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Subcommittee made specific recommendations regarding the Interim Development Policies which must be addressed in order to complete the Overlay District stanoards and regulations. The Planning Commission should review the Subcommittee's comments as outlined in the following sections and provide Staff with specific direction. Regarding the property on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, Staff recommends that the public hearings for the General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment, and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment be continued until the Overlay District standards, regulations, and boundaries are resolved by the Planning Commission. II. ANALYSIS: A. Land Use Interim Policies: The land use policies establish office as the primary function of the corridor. Service and support commercial uses are limited to 20% of the floor area of any project. Subcommittee Comments: The Committee agreed with the 20% maximum of ancillary commercial and business support uses, but requested that special consideration be given for allowing rail service to light manufacturing uses adjacent to the railroad tracks at 8th Street. ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Industrial Amendment 84 -02 - Haven Avenue Overlay October 24, 1984 Page 2 Specific Plan District AnaiysisiRecommendation: The goal of the Haven Avenue policies is to promote intensive high quality office park development. Allowing exceptions Mill dilute the intent of the Overlay District and establish a precedent for future requests. S. Site Orientation Interim Policies: The vehicular circulation pedestrian circulation, and loading areas. The buildings closer to tt between buildings and parking areas. site orientation policies deal with and parking, building placement, and orientation of ancillary service intent of these policies is to group ie street with pedestrian courtyards perimeter vehicular circulation and Subcommittee Comments: The Committee had major concerns with eliminating a --parking from Haven Avenue and recommended that parking be allowed on up to 50% of the frontage on any lot. Analysis /Recommendation : The current interim policies discourage rather than preclude parking along Haven Avenue. Establishing a maximum percentage of linear frontage for streetside parking seems too rigid and in practice will not resolve the design concern or allow site planning flexibility where appropriate. Streetside parking is Lnly one aspect of an overall project design and is interrelated with building location and height. From an urban design perspective, buildings should be in scale with the width of the Haven Avenue right -of -way. Taller, four - plus story structures may impose on this baianca if located too near the street. The current standards cf the Industrial Specific Plan recognize this relationship and requires that for buildings exceeding two stories, or 35 feet in height, an additional 1 foot setback is required for each additional 1 foot in height up to a maximum 70 foot setback. For these reasons, site planning flexibility is desirable and rigid standards that set a percentage of linear frontage or prohibit all streetside parking are unnecessary. In practice, a 50% maximum is likely to become the standard. C. Streetscape and Landscaping Interim Policies: The most significant policy in this section is the increased landscape / hardscape coverage from 15% to 30%. The intent is to help create the campus -like image and a pleasant pedestrian environment. 11 11 r� L. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Industr4al Specific Plan Amendment 84 -02 - Haven Avenue Overlay District October 24, 1984 Page 3 Subcommittee Comments: The Committee recomrended that the andscape /hardscape percentage be reduced from 30% to 25 %, except in the urban centers where it should remain at 30%. The Committee also recommended that requirements for parkway street furniture be eliminated and that water conservation, landscape and irrigation techniques be eliminated. Analysis /Recommendation: Reduction of the landscape /hardscape coverage requirement seems appropriate in conjunction with more definitive guidelines regarding the design and location of pedestrian plazas and courtyards to provide more functional and attractive pedestrian areas. Regarding parkway street furniture, the Planning Division intends to develop a streetscape design theme with the assistance of a professional designer /landscape architect in the near future. Elements of the streetscape design will most likely include street furniture and signing, as well as landscaping. The requirements for water conservation landscape and irrigation techniques should remain also, and will be further defined with streetsca .-e design. is D. Open Space /Pedestrian Environment Interim Policies: These policies encourage centralized pedestrian courtyards or plazas between buildings separated from vehicular parking or circulation, Design elements of the plazas are also specified. E Subcommittee Comments: The Committee recommended that the design of pedestrian plazas not include kiosks or covered walkways, but that water features and public art are preferred. The Committee also recommended eliminating the term "benches" in reference to seating areas to provide greater flexibility for the use of raised planters or other types of seating. At the September 24, 1984 hearing, the Commission specifically added covered walkways. As mentioned previously, staff suggests the design elements of pedestrian plazas and courtyards be further clarified which will address the concern. Analysis /Recommendation: As mentioned in the above streetscape /Landscape section, staff suggests that the design and location of pedestrian areasbe more clearly defined. This should eliminate the Committee`s concerns regarding this issue. —,3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment_ and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 84 -02 - Haven Avenue Overlay District October 24, 1;0-4 Page 4 E. !!aster Plan Development The intent of these policies is to eliminate new subdivisions which create fragmented lot patterns. Master plans will be required for all development proposals and subdivisions. This will allow for integrated master planned developments with the use of reciprocal parking and access, and permit pedestrian and vehicular movement between parcels without_ interferring with traffic flow on Haven Avenue. Subcommittee Comments: The Committee recommended elimination of conceptua architecture for master plans. In their opinion, greater flexibility of architectural design is necessary. The Committee also recommended a minor word change to policies 3 and 4 regarding reciprocal parking and public transit. Analysis /Recomiendatiun: Conceptual architecture is a natural component of a Plaster Plan, intricately related to building configurations and site planning. In addition, requirements for conceptual architecture will facilitate discussion with applicants regarding the Haven Avenue design image early in the review process, thereby reducing future processing delays. Regarding design consistency within Master Plans, current Policy establishes that an interrelated group of buildings linked together with common parking, open space, and circulation, should have similar architectural elements to create a harmonious development. F. 8 chitecture Interim Policies: A progressive, sophisticated, and urban style OT arc titecture is identified to estabiiish a theme and distinguish Haven Avenue from other special boulevards in Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, the proposed architectural Policies are provided to respond to major design issues. The intent is to discourage typical multi - tenant buildings seen elsewhere in the City which may be low profile, linear, rectangular, and blocky with store front elevations, numerous roll -up docrs, and with architectural treatment limited to insignificant recesses and material changes. Subcommittee Comments: The Committee agreed with the progressive, sophisticated and urban style of development of Haven Avenue, but strongly recommended against prohibiting the use of certain architectural styles or exterior materials. The Committee's thought was that a variety of styles and exterior materials can be used effectively to achieve the Haven Avenue image. The Committee also recommended eliminating the Of-Y 1 •I C] E L, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 84 -02 - Haven Avenue Overlay District October 24, 1984 Page 5 prohibition of specific building forms such as low profile, linear, or block forms, since in their opinion, these types of architecture can be designed within the intent of the Overlay District. Analg is/Recommendation: A variety of architectural material can be used to achieve the Haven Avenue image. However, the design guidelines have been written to address certain specific problems along the Corridor, such as low profile linear buildings with storefront eievations. In addition, Staff does not believe that certain architectural styles, such as Spanish or Mediterranean, will be consistent with the Haven Avenue image. G. Urban Centers Interim Policies: This section deals with policies designed to distinguish development near the intersections of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard from the central areas of the Haven Corridor. Development near these key locations will be more intensive to create community focal points or "urban centers ". Subcommittee Comments: The Committee's comments centered around encouraging a variety of construction techniques to achieve the Haven Avenue image. The Committee agreed with requiring multiple story buildings, but recommended that the desirable structural components include steel and concrete (i.e., eliminate reference to "poured in place "). In addition, the Committee recommended eliminating the sentence which discourages wood frame structures. Anal sis /Recommendation: Staff suggests that the Overlay District standards discuss desirable building form and articulation versus the use of materials. In this way, the intent of the standards can be more clearly defined, providing direction to developer; and architects. Also, design flexibility will be allowed as requested by the Subcommittee, but within the bounds of the requirements for the highest quality architecture. /-.5 1,--- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Industrial Amendment 84 -02 - Haven Avenue Overlay October 24, 1984 Page 6 Specific Plan District III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Subcommittee and input from other interested parties, and provide Staff with specific direction in each topic area. The Public Hearing should then be continued to the November 14, 1984 meeting for consideration of the Draft Haven Avenue Overlay District provisions. This direction will be used to complete the Haven Avenue Overlay District standards and regulations to be presented to the Commission and Ch -amber of Commerce in the near future. Respectfully submitted, Pick Gomez City Planner RG:CJ:ns Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Chamber Revisions to Policies Exhibit "8" - interim Development Policies Planning Commission Resolution 84 -99 11 E ' A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COWY-- ISSICN ESTABLISHING A DESIGN GOAL AND ISISERIM DEVELOPMENT POLICIES FROM HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN 4TH STREET AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has expressed numerous concerns with development proposals recently submitted on Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish a design goal for Haven Avenue to guide future development; and WHEREAS, land use and developmen': policies are necessary to implement the design goal for Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, such design and development policies are needed to provide clear direction and guidance to developers and staff alike. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish interim policies for the development of Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard as follows: SECTION 1: Goal Statement. Considering the setting of Haven Avenue and combining the intent of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan, the goal of the Haven Avenue development and land use policies is to: Encourage long -range master planned development along the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the city, and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus -like setting with high prestige identity. SECTION 2: Land Use Policies. The intent of the following policies is to promote land uses and /or development that promotes the design goal for Haven Avenue and enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image: 1. The primary land use function along Haven Avenue is intended to be of an administrative, off* / and professional office nature. 2. Select ancillary commercial and business support service uses shall not exceed 20% of the floor area in any project. Cuncentration of such uses in ar_y building or along the street frontage is not permitted. yr�Y VS?,n: µ> Resolution no. 84 9y Page 2 >� • '• � J 1 �� ,:'_ Lam'. 3. Add provisions for allowing light manufacturing with railway access and loading doors for properties contiguous to railroad right -of -way. - - -' - -" _ 1111 r;an Leveloo eats_ To encourage and integratea N.aster Plan Development, the following policies are established: 1. Conceptual Master Plans shall be sabsitt ^d with all projects (i.e., any development proposals including subdivision applications). Master Plans shall indicate conceptual building pad locations points of ingress and egress, parking lot configurations, conceptual grading and drainage, landscape and plaza areas, pedestrian circulation, and signs_ 2. The Minimum parcel dimensions s? 300 feet wide and 225 feet deep except iz •ae of condominium lots or lots within cer when designed as an integral part of a N <_ter Plan development as defined in the above policy. 3. Vehicular access onto haven Avenue sl_ali be shared with adjacent parcels to promote smocth and efficient traffic circulation along the r- orridor. The minimum distance between drive approaches shall be 300 feet with 100 feet the minimum distance from the curb return u£ any intersection. Also, reciprocal parking and access easements shall be required wfiri_n"nanz; -ra in conjunction with any development proposal. 4_ Public transit facilities shall beAcon�;:o..e� within all Master Plans. Conv__ient pedestrian access shall be provided to designated transit facilities at m,'or intersections. SECTION 4: Site Orientation_ The following policies are intended to promote integrated, pedestrian orientated, office park developm -Lt in a campus -like setting. 1. Circulati-in aisles and parkingRadiacent Avenue sh:al [A "-,- sm: rA� r„ tnan -< th Sr. oor Fr_Q taa: Large parking lots must ® visible from the street, Provided arounu the rear site. 1P. C.. v be located in areas less and circulation shall be and side portions of a NAV&O AVii mW V LI Resolution No. 84 -9y Page 3., Site plans should incorporate the use of disbursed parking areas which reduce the necessity for large parking lots, yet provides conven_ent access to buildings, and does not interrupt interior pedestrian areas. C. Building placement at the streetscape setback is strongly encouraged within ail developments, particularly on c -:ner lots with high visibility. 5; Building arrangements must enhance safe and convenient pedestrian movement on site with Ac-oa i o +s landscaped courtyards, walkways, and seating areas between buiidint-.s. On site circulation for both pedestriaiis and vehicles shall consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian movement. 7. Ancillary service and loading areas shall be designed and located where least visible from public view or adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park ". SECTION 5= Streetscane and L:andscavina. The intent of the Following policies is to enhance the visual quality of the streetscape and provide an attactive and pleasant working environment in a campus -like setting. 1. A minimumkw_nty -Five (251 percent of net lot. area (excludes right -of -way dedications and private streets) shall be landscape areas and hardscape d, plazas or courtyards. r 050 2. Variation of landscape /hardscape coverage may be permitted for individual parcels within master planned developments when the master plan as a whole meets the required coverage and the deviation is consistent with the intent and purpose of the stated design goals for Haven Avenue. 3., A maximum five t5) percent credit toward the required landscape /hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is to be displayed in a setting which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. eA� - MAV&V AVS r.� raW, Resolution No. 84 -99 Adak ;;:�-..- "• ` ?age 4 , r•: 4. A consistent streetscape desiy: theme shall be provided along the Haven Avenue streetscape which incorporates intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rocksca_oe, mounding, and MEWhava meandering sidewalks. In additionA street name p signs are required at all intersections and shall �Oe be low profile, natural alluvial rock monument :. signs with letters indented in a sandblasted concrete face. mom 5. Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape, enhance building architecture, screen utilities and buffer views of automobiles, pavement, and service areas, and to define and enhance the pedestrian walkways and plazas. A -o WATIM _o__ On- street parking along Haven Avenue shall be ��,�.,.�� proh'bited. 7. A11 utilities, including electrical service less than 34.5 KV, shall be undergrounded. SECTION 6: Omen Saace /Pedestrian Environment. The intent of this section is to enhance opportunities for centralized pedestrian spaces separated and /or buffered from vehicular parking and circulation_ and to promote pedestrian_ circulation on and off site. 1. Building configuration and placement shall provide for pedestrian courtyards, plazas or open spaces between and /or adjacent to buildings. 2_ The design of pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall provide shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping. In additinnAwater features, public art,Ald are n_ "�r - ve 3. /\Light standards, trash receptacles, and other street furniture shall be provided in an attractive and comfortable setti_,g and shall be designed to enhance the appearance and function of a site and open space areas. 4_ Covenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. SK *AN _. Resolution No. B4 -9v Page 5 = SECTION 7: Architecture. The following policies are intended to promote a high quality office park image with high prestige_ identity. 1. Desirable architecture along Haven Avenue -:;hal1 8 project a progressive, sophisticated, and urban in style of development. A variations architectural Myles, i:onstruction methods, and materialAi ;couraced to achieve this image. 14 g 2. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass to be in scale and pr--)portion with the Haven Avenue right -of -way and streetscape setback are encouraged.& `, JFV~ "i 3. Buildings designed with retail type storefront elevations (linear configurations with multiple doorways), and numerous roll -up doors are considered to promote o:•erconcentrations of ancillary commercial and business support services and Ore therefore prohibited. 4. Building entrances shall be well articulated with -' variation of architectural planes end /or development of courtyards to project a formal entrance appearance. 5. Variation in depth and angle of architectural planes which create variety anC interest in the basic form and silhouette of a building is required. Structures with simplistic square, rectangular, or block forms areAfI_;vscouraaed, _ .. -, --- Ae�z .,,.A f„ +',m }, i rtY,PCf ,tan6ards oT desi an To articulate the surface of architectural elevations the use of opening and cavities ;which create texture and shadow patterns and interrupt the continuity of a building plane or surface is encouraged. Architectural treatment of buildings shall not be limited to variation in exterior texture, pattern, color, 7zad materials and /or shallow recesses or pro ectior_s. 7. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in cor_junctioa with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. AWM11 400 ,.,. Resolution �. Page 6 NO. 84 -99 8 Visibility of ancillary service ZZ and lcadiag areas from public view and adjoining properties must be limited to the extent possible to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. 9� Building wall signs sha31 consist of individual letters or scraot. Can signs are prohibited. The size, number and location of signs as a'nowed by t),= city Sign ordina ry shall be submitted with the Development Review application and reviewed in conjunction with a tuilding desig*,. SECTIONi 8: Urban Centers. The following policies shall apply to o,:vel;pment near the key intersections of 4th Street and Haven Avez.ue and Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. :he intent is to promote development at a level of activity and intensity sufficient to create community focal points or "urban centers ". 1_ Multiple story buildings of the highest office and professional design quality are required. Desirable structural co ^_ponents include stee3Aand powaso? concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spandrels and alass.1% v%4a Fr-AMIET _ S 2. The use of parking structures is encouraged to 0� promote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian plazas and courtyards. 3. Architecture, site pla_ ^..=.'r_g, and landscaping at the immediate corners or 4th Street and Haven Avenue shall create an intensive and prestigious gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. 4. The minimum parcel size shall ba tive (5) acres except in the case of condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Plan development. 5. A minimum 30% of net lot area shall be landscape areas and handscape plazas or courtyards. ] V �G. RESOLUTION NO. 84 -99 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCPOMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION ESTABLISHING A DESIGN GOAL AND INTERIM DEVELOPMENT POLICIES FOR HAVEN AVENUE BE74EEN 4TH STREET AND FOOTHILL 30ULEVARD MHEREAS, the Planning Commission has expressed numerous c3ncerns with developmen- proposals recently submitted on Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish a design goal for Haven Avenue to guide future development; and WHEREAS, lard use and development policies are necessary to implement the design goal for Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, such design and development policies are needed to provide clear direction and guidance to developers and staff alike. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish interim policies for the development of Haven Avenue between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard as follows: SECTION is Goal Statement. Considering the setting of Haven Avenue and combining the int4nnt of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan, the goal of the Haven Avenue . evelopment and land use policies is to: Encourage long -range master planned development along the Haven Avenue corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high quality gateway into the city, and by prompting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosohere in a campus -like setting with high prestige identity. SECTION 2: Land Use Policies. The inta,it of the following policies is to promote land uses and /or development that promotes the design goal for Haven Avenue and enhances Rancho Cucamorga's image: 1. The primary land use function along Haven Avenue is intended to be of an administ-ative and professional office nature. I 2. Select ancillary commercial and business support service uses shall not exceed 20: of the floor area in any project. Concentration of such uses in any building or along the street frontage is not permitted. SECTION 3: Master Plan Developments. To encourage integrated and ;taster Plan Development, the following policies are established: -� 3 PCP. , �• �� Resolution No. 84 -99 Pace 2 f PPG. ►A 1. Conceptual Master Plans shall be submitted with all projects (i.e., any development proposals including subdivision applications). Master Plans shall indicate conceptual building pad locations and architecture, points of ingress and egress, parking lot configurations, conceptual grading and drainage, landscape and plaza areas, pedestrian circulation, and signs. 2. The minimum parcel dimensions shall be 300 feet wide and 225 feet deep except in the case of condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an in`<gral part of a Master Plan development as defined in the above policy. 3. Vehicular access onto Haven Avenue shall be shared with adjacent parcels to promote smooth and efficient traffic circulation along the corridor. The minimum distance between drive approaches shall be 300 feet with 100 feet the minimum distance from the curb return of any intersection.. Also, reciprocal parking and access easements shall br required in conjunction with any development proposal. 4. Public transit facilities shall be designed within all Master Plans. Convenient pedestrian access sail be provided to designated transit facilities at major intersections. SECTION 4: Site Orientation. The following policies are intended to promote integrated, pedestrian orientated, office park development in a campus -like setting. 1. Circulation aisles and parking along street frontages and between buildings through the interior of a project shall be avoided unless there are unusual circumstances. Large parking lots must be located in areas less visible from the street, and circulation shall be provided around the rear and side portions of a site. 2. Site plans should incorporate the use of disbursed parking areas which reduce the necessity for large parking lots, yet provides convenient access to buildings, and does no'_ interrupt interior pedestrian areas. 3. t- uilding placement at the streetscape setback is strongly encouraged within all developments, particularly on corner lots with high visib'lity. 4. Building arrangements must enhance safe and convenient pedestrian movement on site with uninterrupted landscaped courtyards, walkways, and seating areas between buildings. ptco gas, l •J 11 Resolution No. 84 -99� Page 3 f PC. 5. On site circulation for both pedestrians and vehicles shall consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made where appropriate to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian. movement. E. Ancillary service and loading areas shall be designed and located where least visible from public view or adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park ". SECTION 5: Streetscape and Landscaoina. The intent of the following policies is to enhance the visual quality of the streetscape and provide an attractive and pleasant working environment in a campus -like setting. 1. A minimum thirty (30) percent of net lot area (excludes right -of -way dedications and private streets) shall be landscape areas and hardscape plazas or courtyards. 2. Variation of landscape /hardscape coverage may be permitted for individual parcels within master plan -ied developments when the master plan as a whole meets the required coverage and the deviation is consistent with the intent and purpose of the stated design goals for Haven Avenue. 3. A maximum five (5) percent credit toward the required landscape /hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is to be displayed in a seting which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. 4. A consistent streetscape design theme shall be provided along the Haven Avenue streetscape which incorporates intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rockscape, mounding, and meandering sidewalkr.. In addition, parkway street furniture of a co- : ,-Istent contemporary design shall be provided by all projects. Street name signs are required at all intersections and shall be low profile, natural alluvial rock monument signs with letters indented in a sandblasted concrete face. 5. Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape, enhance building architecture, screen utilities and buffer views of automobiles, pavement, and service areas, and to define and enhance the pedestrian walkways and plazas. Ma Of Resolution No. 84 -99,- Page 4 6. water conservation landscape techniques are required such as the use of drought tolerant plant species and irrigation systems which include drip emittevs, low volume steam rotors, deep watering of trees and shrubs, tensiometers to measure soil moisture, and automatic timers. 7. On- street parking along Haven Avenue shall be prohibited. 8. All utilities, including electrical service less than 34.5 KV, shall be undergrounded. SECTION 6: Open Space / Pedestriar. Environment The intent of this section is to enhance opportunities for centralized pedestrian spaces separated and /or buffered from vehicular parking and circulation and to promote pedestrian circulation on and off site. 1. Building configuration and placement shall provide for Pedestrian courtyards, plazas, or open, spaces between and /or adjacent to buildings. 2. The design of pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall Provide shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping and should include water features, public art, kiosks, and covered walkways. 3. Benches, light standards, trash receptacles, and other street furniture shall be provided in an attractive and cc- ` -)rtable setting and shall be designed to enhance the app- arance and function of a site and open space areas. 4. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. SECTION 7: Architecture. The following puiicies are intended to promote a high quality office park image with high prestige identity. i. Desirable architecture along Haven Avenue shall project a progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development. Spanish, Mediterranean, or traditional architecture with predominant use of stucco, wood siding, shake, or tile roofs is considered to be inappropriate. 2. Variations in architectural styles, construction methods, and materials for certain ancillary uses, such as restaurants and backs, may be approved in cases where a particular design is necessary and more appropriate considering the intended use of a building. � -l6 11 C E ,?�, ice. 8�•?y 11 Resolution No. 84 -9P— �• C . Page 5 ( {. 3. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass to be in scale and proportion with the Haven Avenue right -of -way and streetscape setback are encouraged. Low profile linear buildings constructed at the streetscape are discouraged. 4. Buildings desiqned with retail type storefront elevations (linear configurations with multiple doorways), and numerous roll -up doors are considered to promote overconcentrations of ancillary commercial and business support services and are therefore prohibited. 5. Building entrances shall be well articulated with variation of architectural planes and /or development of courtyards to project a formal entrance appearance. 6. Variation in depth and angle of architectural planes which create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of a building is required. Structures with simplistic square, rectangular, or block forms are prohibited. 7. To articulate the surfaces of architectural elevations the use of openings and cavities which create texture and shadow patterns and interrupt the continuity of a building plane or surface is encouraged. Architectural treatment of buildings shall not be limited to variation in exterior texture, pattern, color, and materials and /or shallow recesses or projections. 8. Accent treatment such as chances in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form giving elements of a structure. 9. Visibility of ancillary service and loading areas from public view and adjoining properties must be limited to the extent possible to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. 10. Building wall signs shall consist of individual letters. Can signs are prohibited. The size, number and location of signs shall be submitted with the Development Review application and reviewed in conjunction with a building design. SECTION 8: Urban renters. The following policies shall apply to development near the Key intersections of 4th Street and Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. The intent is to promote deve'opment at a level of activity and intensity sufficient to create community fuL ' points or "urban centers ". Resolution No. 54 -99 Page 6 { R C. 1. Multiple story buildings of the highest office and professional design quality are required. Desirable structural components include steel and poured in place concrete in conjunction with curtain wails, spandrels and glass. Wood frame structures are discouraged. 2. The use of parking structures is encouraged to promote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian plazas and courtyards. 3. Architecture, site planning, and landscaping at the immediate corners of 4th Street and Haven Avenue shall create an intensive and prestigious gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. 4. The minimum parcel size shall be five (5) acres except in the case of condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Plan development. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1 984. PLANK NC CO3 ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY /jp, Dennis L.. Stout, Crairtnan 1G %11�' ATTEST; / Ri . IGomez, Deputy Secretary I. Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ."Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1584, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL U 11 X—/F y 0411* P.C. AW54 of- it 11 C�1 Ll DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM 1977 October 24, 184 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission, Rick Gomez, City Planner Curt Johnston, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN !+MLNUMtNI 234 -U4A - HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - A General Plan Amendment from off ice to Industrial Park for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208- 341 -01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELUYMtNI u1 .>cK16A AMENDMENT — — HAV N V" NU L D — Deve opment District en ent from OP (Office /Professional) to ISP (Industrial Specific Plan) and MH (14 -24 du /ac) for approximately 40 acres of land located on the west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208- 331 -01, 12, 13, and 208- 341-01. XjEN-DMFNT 84 -01 - HAVEN AVENUt UYtKLAT Ui3eR1%,1 - Mo amendment to the In ustria pecific Plan to expand the boundaries of Subarea 7 (Industrial Park category) to include approximately 40 acres of land located on west side of Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Highway, in conjunction with the Haven Avenue Overlay District - APN 208 - 331 -01, 12, 13 and 208 - 341 -01. Staff recommends that these items be continued until the Overlay District Standard regulations and boundaries are resolved by the Planning Commission at a Future Public Hearing. CJ:cv ITEMS M, N, 0 E CJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 197: DATE: October 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Naadcy Fong, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84 -44 - FORECAST MORTGAGE CORP. - the development of a 2 -story office building totaling 4,340 square feet on 0.5 acre cf land in the Office /Professional District generally located on the east side of Hellman Avenue, south of Baseline Road APN- 208 - 431 -29 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan, and architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Construction cf a 2 -story office h_;lding totaling 4,340 square feet. C. Location: East side of Hellman Avenue, south of Baseline Road. D. Parcel Size: 0.5 acre. E. Existinq Zoning: Office /Professional District F. Existing Land Use: Vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and 7-nine: North - Office Professional, Residential, oas station; Office Professional Dic ±rict, Low Residential District. South - Railroad tracks, res;4ential; Low Residential District. West - Vacant, res dential construction; Office /Professional District, Medium Residential District, Low Residential district. .-ast - Railroad tracks, Residential; Low Residential District. H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Office Professional ITEM P PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -44 - Forecast Page 2 North - Office Professional, Low Residential 2 -4 du /ac. South - Low Resdiential 2 -4 du /ac East - Low Residential 2 -4 du /ac West - Office Professional, Low Residential 2 -4 du /ac, Medium Residential 4 -14 du /ac I. Site Characteristics: The project =ite is vacant and rough graded with no structures or signifir =;t vegetation. Along Hellman Avenue, there is an existing retaining wall approximately four feet high with asphalt berming that levels off at the rough graded building pad. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The proposed development is the last phase of the entire office complex planned for this triangular piece of land, at the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Baseline Road. The use of th;s proposed building is intended for a single tenant. The developer is continuing the same theme of architecture for this office building as in the existing one, which had received Planning Commission approval (DR 83 -25). The exterior materials included the use of cream color stucco, machine applied and red tile trimmings. Access to the site shall be from Hellman Avenue and Baseline Road. All parking areas on site are fully improved except for landscaping. However, along the southeasterly parking areas, within the Flood Control easement, landscaping has been installed. 8. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Ccmmittee reviewed the project and recommended several design and landscaping changes. These changes include: 1) the removal of the roll - up overhead door at the soiw' ' heast elevation, 2) providing extensive landscaping through special landscape treatment at key areas along Hellman Avenue and against the building to compliment the elevation, especially around the building angles. The Design Review Committee also requested that a final design of the pedestrian walkway with safety considerations, such as guard rail along Hellman Avenue as an interim sid^walk shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that with the recommended conditions of approval the project is consistent with applicable standards and ordinances. D. Environmental Assessment: The Grading Committee has also conceptually approved the grading plan subject to an approved P- a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -44 - Forecast Page 3 final grading plan prior to issuance of building permits. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project together with the mitigation measure. To avoid a potential pedestrian and circulation hazard, the developer is required to install a pedestrian sidewalk with protective rail along Hellman Avenue, until such time the City has installed the drainage improvements and the required street improvements for this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development Code an the General Plan. The proposed use, building design and site plan, tcgether with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable City standards. In addition, the project will not be d^trimentai to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impact. ® IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for Environmental Review in he Daily Report Newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission aproved DR 84 -44 and adopt the attached Resolution and Conditions pertaining to this proJect. Respectful l_,,;i-Wbmitted, ck Gomez ty Planner RG: NF: cv Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut "A" - Location Map /Site Utilization Map "B" - Conceptual Site Plan "C" - Detailed Site Plan "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan "E" - Grading Plan "F" - Elevations Study - Part I ions of Ar-liroval with Conditions P'3 M6M R trnn q. I Q a+a�= sl i rrrr i SITE UTILIZATION MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCA�IO.NGA PL % "NNILNc DI\rISIo\T n s. ✓ � JJ� 7-77 — i -lix ! 3 z El i NORM 1TL\ I: T1-1 U: LV i1GIT: ~ ee SCkLE= T�—T El E i 'f.4 6R�Yp�RM MAVICE STATION N" 4DIN0 I I 1 � � I I 1 e � V i SITE PLAN N EUSTP6 Ory TNICD�- CITY OF RANCHO CUANNIONGiN PLANNING DIt'LIO! ,0- S� i �Qt:TH 1 DETAILED SITE PLAN I N �v E PROJECT DATA s - •wr�r...0 ra.r u♦ Om . C5� \ORTH CITY OFF ITEM: -rlTU-1. PI kNINI .G DIVIS90N i_\I;II�T- m El E I� I! i I I a �a �I 1 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN FLAW SP -ECna+ us TPEES ya��tl 0 4I IYiP[ aGYr��YW ypr �CaY O1L aplY'�Y �►lln4PaC �alO �Y 2Ma5 CITY OF ITEM: _ 04:n4lj RANCHO CUC. -It O G.. TiTU.:.��i�t� t PLVNNING DID ;SIO\ AOL TV4L'R�a/2'aY rf� W Wa0 VbY�a�tla�w�N aaia� ra0I�6'I�� \�i ad NOYa�R� O�a�t�laM N aTM W� YAYa�O n�aa \Ok Yl�i� Wap(y�p� \OEtTH i . J I CONCEPTUA>! GRADIIIG PLAN NORTH 0 El CITY OF IrE\I:. W6 RANCHO CUCAX'IONOA PI. V�N[\G DR ISiON Exliffi r: 140-9 0 E 11 ILLUSTRATIVE BUILDING ELEVATIONS CITY Or R. -NCHO CUC AMONG.-, PL- VNNI \G DIVISKQ` TFTU": aodAf: —z s SCALE- ,019 NORTH C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMFTION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this worm must be completed and submitted to the Development Ra-view Committee through the department where the proiect application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Ce:=ittee will meet and take action no later than ten (10). days before the public meeting at which time the proect is to be heard. The Committee wil3 made one of three determinations: 1) The project wil:L have no Vigni- f1cant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact anei an Environmental =mpact Report be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: �PP�G,aST �-1C �3U /L /.2t} APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRE�- TELEPHONE: NA* "-£, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: �,,„�- C;0- e11730 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCE:.NO.) APP 4 %og -431 - Z' LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSA-Y FROM LOCAL, Rs GIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 10-/0 11 N I PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND.CQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BU3.LDIVGS, IF ANY: cis- �1a/g DESCRIBE THE ENVIRO .SAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, FL'PNTS (TREES). ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STIRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually sr..all, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? /s/ o 1-2 tow WILL THIS pROJECT YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ,C_ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? `c 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? ,x S. Remove any existing trees? E,7w many? 6. Create the :.eed for use or disposal of Potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: A/,ft. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. Ell CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, anr. information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional i-'zformation may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Corsnittee. ;sate_ 4iZ714A- Signature �„ r i �/ Z" Title RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -44, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASELINE ROAD, IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 17th day of September, 1384, a complete application was filed by Forecast Mortgage Corporation for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of October, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Cede and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 24, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -44 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: P—/3 ENGINEERING DIVISION 1• A final design of-the pedestrian walkway with safety considerations such as guard rail as a1 interim sidewalk along Hellman Avenue shall be submitt,:a to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Cross sections of pedestrian walkway to the City Engineer shall be included in the final design. PLANNING DIVISION 1. Separate Sign Permit shall t review and approval by the signs shall be designed to existing office complex. 2. Trash enclosure shall be Standards. e required, subjected to Planning Division. The be compatible with the provided per the City 3. A legal document authorizing the use of the Flood Control Easement for landscaping and parking shall he submitted to Planning Division prior to issuance of Building permits. 4. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees and intensified landscaping shall be required along Hellman Avenue. APPROVEO AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCT03ER 1984, PLANNING COMMISSIf,'N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. stout, Chairman ATTEST: Rick Gomez, Deputy ecretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, anc adopted ny the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: A:SENT: COMMISSIONERS: 10—/(/ Qi Q i C El u •°•�� ^T4 4N Iz d Cog -a `JO -' c N- _.n .du ••P_ ^ 4 4- q ••°r 9 G T O C r i� r � 0 ° Y - J C N_ .' •. . J ,> u .`..Vi. O� U O °u9 u ddNU aq o c ...��k 4jr `r ``oc' s3 °e Pid -e «° Y•+T «a`c N 4 iVT.r rn - G� ^V VC9 90-r 0 •O C �_'_ .T.`4� OC6 C `Ol` ��nNO« d PTUUT CY� 'ON .H :' 'lpr V'VN LO^1T o... S u ¢• IG � -�m•y PQ- «�9yb rr`p0 yO P""_P P� N�U`EC J r .. jOgC� IVY. q.^ly -T V ^. -VOir Or G =.V�i C Ij� �• 6Y•C Or ew ao b`�e4 -r Gtr ^_ c °S 4wu; sY� _ ro �^. Mcr°va eS- o r Y.VC �•�.n .G V. Or 440V qN�° 9- L..'6lO�q U.. O o C � C..O. CGN�O 9 N O� V` N O.r ` V V d r G- w N_ C O- V -4 ° V P'C) C !•� e V �• `_ O l CC 4 V .� r � .. r N -�i •... y f -^ l T T O q a s V ... yy 4 V PO •<i. 9 U T •� a O P q P C C 6 0 N 9 V > O^ C C N r= C' -. y C 9_ _ • ] V° C N 4 .n l= d =aG a > 9C Op_ 0 ' -V� La". Pr6 =FN `r.�rw _PV.] O VP -O °•� t °�•• :g. 4� 4 d. >.� nq> c r -�� _= ^`9q fir' u Ny � 4 o�`..r - O ••• rb c >d u.`° ei y£G.$ ° Y d V M aCi b �•-c9n �TNX qV ��w�n �t . TGVrY SOP r.O�.J o L V LE. rT64<� r Pv 1 5 f .gOn ° 9 O .. a N .r b O 6 4 l J V_ L '• - 9 N r � V r � C N l .G. ` N � N 9 _ M Ppr °407 = _P �yV969jN1 ZC T rppy.�i. 4: « <NNCF'L -b �OJ 4V 60�d1 6 6 `O m L4L =P d O O .J- O GZ p¢ o a § 0 V � Q O Z N C u � § Q J � Y CCC N < � V C M O ^ i O ••°r 9 G T O ° i « d 90-r 0 C W q N S ¢• C �• eS- o 4 O � O. � V � p - O ••• - G V ° Y d V M aCi b r Pv 1 5 f .gOn N G 1 0 Z ♦•a v ci .O L d C—J q 4 o qra o n. 2^ c b_ vq ✓ q ✓ C ✓ Y •J P V 3 r L C O 9 4 — ✓.Vnq .• C � rn Jq C L C� q G 4 O ✓ _ 4 L C •^ q b J q 6 rVi• ° o < ^� C Cq V_ v V _ •^e r C V S C •O _ O i V ✓ u d ✓ G= b rI n G< 2 A a •- N q a < z a O V G d q q r d _ I G r c_ r q q 7 ✓ T � L L 6' ry c � v a C _ C q D V M G Na4y.E rS�M`d � a T o � +VOyi ar p N U r V O r V•O u p P O O p V✓ a_ 9 G a O q y y = r q w .ra J V 4 L n L i D G w � C 9✓ p a j 4 C d y c c N E E a J N T M d V y rw v G ✓ ° O N4 V C NCL- -Ny LI NOn6 ^ ^vr �'a2O v - b J C qVr V5a L Py L O �N ire C w•wv�9 V ✓ _w P r -_ u e ^ ✓ n T q V ° r N JL = 6r U 4 a G `r P � b n a a _ r O q Q Y oa 2 .err L > 4 � a r< L ^ w d r°n Lq r. _ c ^ r y j O ni u .`r•N . v c r E n o r 9.+ 4 T - ° V NAY q t �qE ✓ O O oq -d. C �? c 0 L j V N L O N C �so LaI uca rra to TVO b C _ r c O J O cc v �<4 P P q V _ ` E wl m, \,l Q a iy o d - a L ✓ b O. _ v C p C L aw�6.TE° a t ELr ,5E- 3 7;:S ac G r 9 V O C N O ✓•pa L G U M N j V dam'' rYc G ✓ O r L N 2=.5 G _q Td9 •I Cv•)r•�Y�CV FpJ+t _ 6 <1 m, V ar r. o.• a a�c� G d a c D 4 b 4 C aNN �Ia V d O y C q C o .r• q d f ^ V r p L C _ � ✓ C' C O L L O _ p d c�r°n y j E ay u v r YC 4 r �� N•.r aY CO •= V M L — v q O V - -� d y q 2 'J M_ L 2 C P1� C • L O O +• L E 4 nua�L rO 00 �6 w � I C1 c 6 J nV N » t • C V _ C _ V GR C c c� €a LOCei o-a zs �_ _ ~`` L G V L C C ET— 7 °erC e C V r C� V C • t 6 _— tlF O.a i Q_ G rVr 2 r• L rC O) w N N �r � �Cq <CO 4t. L PLC ^V :C •�ia�q y_cD�C ° C N r C V CU <.• C_ __ nt C�fC C q V C q r .7t r L 7 V+ C< C C) N q 9 < V -J ✓ V 6 V! P�� � r� M C T O = �dV 4OC P N �a•�y_ L o L a L- T� >_` - as orn c4 �c 9 O> y 2 L P q P L• N 4 roc ^. Va r � Eu4 r+0 q a a ✓Vy �3: 0• • C V LO qv ° C N 6MO C C V UO sC �.Jrr0 <re r-fJJ M u 2� � a t G < .••r n M C L < N V Q ra _ yr L r `•C' O E r Pa6 � V P ✓ M ` � L U L Lc. � c c ° C{- V N )[ P L C c cam c r C r d N O V� V rV i � Or Gy c ^ Tp C C O nr E p L C p✓ T O V P rr.taC a C� Or y CL L V.bi� r O ° -q—Vv q E o N c n•+ qw C O q L M L V O � L < = L 6 q _q C c -° c r -N c _ N E > N � O P q c $ L V V arrP O iC q � 1 N 1yi V G = P C M <E�+np E E EV` • R�:� N u y O Ci. E 11 u o y L ^ V 7 S •O.• •Li _ d t - C J L O ^ Y= T a L P c = G O V grYf P6 n �MoQ. G N d O C •r d ^ u 1 d G L G N A 11 n Y V « l d Q P N N N NGr - c a`ay- D N 6 P O p O NON N t�• ^ cL P4 V C - tld�rc tl C C � C J�� V E � b O C p V .Or O G V A � Y a'- C d _ rtl V^ � q q VLD M� 4 r 4 a _ c }•r o N_ DD �✓ N =9 wy V n G ✓ C •� ✓ q V LPq�U ^ C yy c O w•L•• •n O C C A Y O L 6 O•r> 4 0 LLLL Ni -jc r ^�• tlVq < •O S V• V V 6 A� 0 6 c C L C N tl� co q O c S L a � Ltl N V Y q E" « C � O O Q V V P O J L O P r G E 4 q q r } t^ N G c c O v `• q q V N ntl� q � PO_ y C C L � r ° c ^ -dE4 < E w 4 C a d ^ o V L L N = P N c O 9 yC C =y V• N O c v 4 r� ✓ G N tl 6 � b L A q y O _ y O ✓ C y NL t O P V ° y ` r O O •a O e J r 4 ✓ > y O A H D •r°• C L + w O 4 i n r d q u wN 9 P q .tl G✓ < u �`t9 O +LT G ^• ` q�va u p V � W V dqa� y T + + tlyJ .QOe 'e A q -rca +q o• c^aM "`'vvc c A �.G. •.• °LCq O^ yG L c N P M u d tl e L P••• !Z7; M Q o Z CL T N T c�6" y c } qy L O O Tl; r V^ T 4 6 A- o «".c., ° °�° 4 c O1 7 NAB +� V •ce V N O L L -J TP6yr C-. �uP ` y N `dp +t G9 C4 V O� � a� oo °y l A pO 2 9 9 9 � yo a 40 L �tl f C 9 � d v` o� p D � M J y 4 b c T o ` o i C q N p b p q L � 4 O•= .L.• N „ALE 4 V - � P S tl N M M ! V r N c L c 7 y 4 q V N 4 rrj• r L N y y i L e o0 O C � A O V c+ O � t V N C y O _ G ` O V O V ` V N f CM +q �C 6 ice= Coq O G 6 � O V C M+ O O C r S « L O.6 - b p = r Tc� 9 C✓ 0 ✓gz— S J V do v L q c VY.'O y y q C r d .0 N q °r A O � G « P q G �iJ G j6 JT•J NO b� c i tlL �• a.-u �e.� C S y M y 9 7 y V L I J• N OL l L 4 � •� V _ G q fj C_T_ r-n� ✓�'O L C V L V r ocry vr✓ N> 4 v q Via- �An > r r L c Wrr,O` "00 - NL 4 �Eca S P A uy.cp NONtl N N c r r L L O C Gryi. V POVi N O r P O y� 9 T •� S C •00 c yL c r - w4D4 c1r'� c C tl w0 G b �O� d q0+ q•rcV C +��•ra L+ P r✓ N` y^ A « q t �� ✓LF.� rem 4� L d +4p O a Y'c. •ca S� t 6 6�p�tlN L g V L l 2: 6.0. V w N T q E fitl =� � Vg •rV.•O V L ogrY. N . } +•Ju N c + ^ = C OOOGA F gwN2d f O G •ca L 6 C V •L..• q O.> n T b � p C •-n NO L Or d d O qq l O• C• V LO d c C � V � O O ` Y•V «06f 0.i W P-17 u •` A L a O O A+ c t nr 4 � ND PZ =� � V M+ O q cue P N4F� 9 y L ` O V O•V Oy q�r ^ c C K ov Y-o L O Eo •r0 Eca+ GNV b t G y y s V A V � . a V' N V O• �tl =rl . V ✓ L q L rcr +y N + N N O C C O � Oil 4� wlO 0 M �RR• c b� W P u n N rxl 0 P C L =tl 0 S n `n tl c y O P 4 c ✓ O C P V � p d � O q ✓r .Os �y q G q �N tl� C p� q � 0 N < ^ G o � O + «O ^ O• C r L Y ^ `2M PL C � L q f O P C qtl r � ✓a u� V O < u q� s q 4 V + p L O ° A � 4 y q C C p tl� u .4• •wa` aq P p• 4 q p en T � u• V N d E d .L � ✓4 ✓ E H P L 4� p• 7� 4 L N en Z V -i i P� S P— •Py L d t • _ N 1: _ _ c a vo .. ° �G ii •- r oo mP ct .CNy iuL U CP^ Q `> La VS O�� CJY 2 NV qr ^ C SN b F C sC y d^J`Q uuV —� BON`P v G` yJ „E b0 rN =y CI uE y —yu� T S OS � t'O. n6 qS Lu L4 i< dV VO�EY 7 Ec rc y6 Og �Cw�C+ Tel d q —OL �Crm r V 6 l Y��d W r �D _9 Y b q�• rO. 6 P 9 i eZ _ °. "•+°� � ^caE r c.e NN �f OL �u_v so` N c o r 6 N P C uLbC —�c— N >�JL V E.2 L• N (L r E S= V ` p(c V — V� p i r�— y �_ U 2—( °r Lr a T•r QTb ` VP Pl'N Py OG °pN aio 9 w N O UW 6OazWN pr9 0 N StiS WYV `r b N � I � _ 1 WI � N� �� PI i1 • N1 S r d v y 9 d i O Y yC r � V E C b O Q d d Y v O r u S � r 9 � C 1 V c e L q 9 C V p � •„• d y l— d _ q t Eco. "� TW Tom t C ^r yO a,l O'L PEW �_� • C V UO Cr < 6 m O V VI W W y E 2 C` N n I d O � r O ° C r ° E � Nn p 9 r — e N W v � r V � o E W u M o ff...60 N G ✓ = J � 6 Cc _ V c b D - _ cc f! U Ngry NT n VyG <' ^_Od To V V G N C d y J OG6 VS••'= c4V €vim ° Iy o 90 c� o O CO C L O CS q Q U C t 6 L C ` a co V r_ b I— C v C C J G T I G� V_ _ c T^ C L G ^_ -if o G L Gleam N r ` rL PN �.C�TL BCD r i �C Or p I I � SSW Vf6 �qq b m NI I ^I •� I 0 Q� p I I d n ^ •I P•L C C~ so -2 i I u^p `� .Ni.aM f �- "-� L a r .. ° L � dWyL —Gt -- C N� •=-C nO fc N q � Y .� � r C _ M V u • L l u —� d .rw CCGU CO ^C `—. 6CgC 9C o C G C T C a C r -N�p N.ce` .._ a NN '" •yam n. O d l �cc ` •� ` O O C C ° < 2 q d O � L ay b += V Lq <Oi Z OLI VSTNC 6t 09 � '• c: c� nar O�•e �� d` OC CPON N M4�.d. � X00 �OGOCw jp dC ° �TCw LCNJ C dE rpi0u L �` H P f� C a�0 mob C L C P V J C V WP d M G6 dJ P Sr TS� rp V` W�L72 �y�r CwNOr G_° �dL„Op N9 L w ' J e � °ro v•etla jaPi -. =z e > e ao n o Lw J r Z . v Cc Le r P dc�+•° O.G °1 °9Nw� 9G_L `V 9 ^L QU b G 9 C L• N b L V P O t � O 5` 4 =gYE L `6J�� n o 4 C T r•'• GP 7 OTGGP VCp� • -C."C o P. wduwC p_°; OLV .�. N ✓NL V <��° = OVC` �w, 6 O V V O P V rJ = \Y J 0 Z V d O 1 a d — O N r i o M y .. ✓ c a N« w1°.2. C� ` �_ G P N ✓ C N C L.. `'na Ly� PFY lr_ Nr O °C U _ �'�r u✓ J L rV O l O C:V O p TY 5� 2 q U P —7Z Nu NW V� CV LCU Tr CN OI GP V U f r « V v O y Y N u C l V 31 V9 �Q 0 C a 4 e C G c E 1 V v P L a =�✓ - y _ 4 a J - J U r N r a a J N c c N L n L C 9 N i M u E E y yL G. N p r v L L^ G 4 p V l r G 4 r d CW V E E p ii t• W D r V v P L OI y a =�✓ - y _ 4 a J - J U r N r a a J N c c N L n L C 9 N M u E E y yL G. N p r v L L^ G 4 p V l r G 4 r d CW V E E p t• W D r N T a a V C •W W C Otr W OW qu 9 N V C C C V O� V• C Cr n O C P > es OI y a =�✓ - y _ 4 a J - J U r N r V 4 c c cL" C 4 Nom° u E E y yL G. N p r v L L^ G 4 p V l r G 4 r d CW V E E p _ O 4• Y c q_~ r 4 cy pr V, � c J' °•� I O _ t � e t O O O O L W ' « u !Q l V q E u � W �t L v N Y > c C • O ` Q t ° G g r q « Y • r m� O• Tr iO O.r r C G w q u r J t Y r l Ho- W.v C p t � e t O O O O L W ' « u !Q l V q E u � W �t L v N Y > c C • O ` Q t ° G g r q « Y • r m� O• Tr iO O.r r C G w q u r J t Y r l Ho- W.v C p o � i 3__ � it•. ks o �e ^I -- _o - 9 `Ld• 9 ` � e - 2� =r s -9 �.• Nw aj?•'.b a � v d` "-' L ^� °e' .°` L 9 La E N pc V•i dz w LE C j N .� 6 d d E V V N N: C E cL+ I U> > � L• a b = L� � V f ^ U • d l r r C ^ d .'t' � L < C N L NV C _ — L� _ -- y •V V yy yW � IMr T— a . 5i.r �� 6M�J —9v �L— >> Cif O -N� Iz \`I■ 111 Cy 1 `./� -a 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN ONGA STAFF REPORT PATE: October 24, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning C:.,mmission FROM: Rack Gomez, City Planner BY: Linda D. Daniels, Associate Planner 1977 SUBJECT: ENV IRONMFNTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 84-35 - �DJNhELL SF19HAM - The deve.opment of 2 manufacturing buildings totalling 41,245 net square feet on 2.25 acres of land located in a General Industrial /Rail served (subarea 10) District generally located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and 7th Street. - APN- 229 -251- 70. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site plan and architectural design and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. E. Purpose: Development of two industrial manufactcring buildings totaling 41,245 net square feet. C. Location: The northeast corner of Milliken Avenuc and 7th Ttr�' eet. 0. Parcel Size: 2.25 acres E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial /Rail Served F. Existinq Land Use: Vacant G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoning. North - Vacant and Industrial Develrpment, General Industrial /Rail Served. South - Industrial Development, General Industrial East - Vacant, General Industrial /Rail Served West - Vacant, General Industrial /Rail Served ITEM Q PLANNING COMMISSIGN STAFF REPORT OR 84 -35 October 24, 1984 Page 2 H. General Plan Desi Project Site - e North - General South - General East - General West - General naLions• nera r. ustrial /Rail Served Industrial /Rail Served Industrial Industrial / ?ail Served Industrial /Rail Served I. Site Characteristics: The site is predominantly vacant with mostly weeds and the remains of grape vines being indigenous to the area. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The subject site is locat ?d along Milliken Avenue which �s identified by `he Industrial Area Specific Plan as a special boulevard. For this reason special architectural design and landscaping techniques are required. The lot size appears adequate in size to accomnodata the proposed development with the required parking and landscaping. The Milliken Avenue frontage is not required to be improved at this time for the entire length of the west property line. The immediate intersection of Milliken Avenue and 7th Street will be improved, however, acditicnal improvements north on Milliken will be deferred until such time as the overpass is constructed. Due to the road nct being constructed it is not necessary to landscape the right- of -wav for the entire length or the west property frontage. Landscaping will be provided in the right -of -way and on -site so that the parking is shielded. North of the screened parking area the right -of -way will be landscaped for a distance of approximately 25 feet extending west of the building. B. Design Review Cc-- ittee: The Design Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed a proposal for development of the site,. During that proposal the Committee discussed several recommendations of approval dealing with architectural design, landscaping, setbacks and required screening. The applicant has revised his original building elevations to what is presented before you now in order to comply with the DRC's recommendations. It should be noted that the landscape plan submitted is a conceptual one only. A Final landscape plar, is required to be approved prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant has been made aware of the need for more appropriate landscape materials and locations along the west face of Buildings A and B and the Milliken Avenue right -of -way. 19L-a �J E J E 1J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 84 -35 October 24, 1984 Page 3 C. Development Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed the subject proposal and has recommended approval to the Commission. There are conditions included in the Resolution, which would ensure the compliance of all applicable requirements of the City. D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee has given conceptual approvai to the preliminary grading plan provided that the finished floor of Building 'A" be reduced to 10O's elevation and that a retaining wall be constructed along the west property line by Building "S ". Conditions reflecting these requirements have been included on the attached Resolution for your consideration. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been complete y the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a :Negative Declaration would be appropriate. I1I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. The proposed use, building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable City Standards. in addition, the project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV._ CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised far Environmental Review in The Daily Report Newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Cormission adopt the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval pertaining to this project. ty Planner RG:LD:cv itted, (�' -3 ,:.. '�' ;;`. i w:+ ', �'�; .; , . ;: ;� - �' :� �2 ^i `i ,'' �,`'! I �/, � !.: � �!, / � '. r If �r� (il ' �� ,'9 'Y.♦ :,..:� ab,l�. CITY Or RA":CHO Ct; ATIviOi NG , PLkNNING DIVE 0\1 a-- S ITE \I= P-9 S# -.45 TITLE= 46X,4t&-W 2W EXHIBIT- __ SC,XLE= NORTH ei 7• b / J a k F9 � Y tnaeao lsornc.se L - I _m a6■ ,� is.:c U. z98C - W aseoe D�ao? Z �Zawx Ji 0 z -? - -U �= z 2a.= Q zvee`= aaae On =faces a<t aec .x: r je Ni caC. CITY OF ITEM: ys RATNCH) CUCA INIONGA TITLE : P&.u. ]PLANNING QIVISICN EXHIBIT u � SCALE- "w ' V NORTH E i = L - I _m a6■ ,� is.:c U. z98C - W aseoe D�ao? Z �Zawx Ji 0 z -? - -U �= z 2a.= Q zvee`= aaae On =faces a<t aec .x: r je Ni caC. CITY OF ITEM: ys RATNCH) CUCA INIONGA TITLE : P&.u. ]PLANNING QIVISICN EXHIBIT u � SCALE- "w ' V NORTH E 0 El CITY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA PLANNING DIVGTON a_I ITIL\ 1= Del 00Y-246 TITLE: 6940/06 AM Et ilBIT: 'C' SCALE: C/` FORTH I r; m � i I �Y ALlvi �/r0 �A� f... l•.fL.(VC r-i w w �• _. .` �4.I� �� I :.r {4. � X4.7. •Ri�ey�"' •� ��-p- w :1��/�ri %16� J.. y��dv -+�• � .= � j^�_, -� A' '•yv,`'.� 6fr��y -�� •fc i 'u...cw+•c ew�a. EAST 1,; Md� 1 SOUTH s WEST L/ �l NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAVIONGA TITLE: £IAAAAM • Pda�- � PL\NNING DIVISIUN EXHIBIT: SG \LL-= OL 0 E W,N V�w�EE �I �J IIg i E E E m n 0 S s Q O O m y 5 i b ••$ � g�p ;�• k�i Y $_ NORTH CITY OF ITEM- A A RANCHO ��'CHD Ci,C.f1_V101 TITLE! t� l td�41 PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: __!fL u -SCALE.. 0.-to l) E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAT, STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Cc =ittee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental. Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the initial Stndy_. The Development Review committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: None APPLICANT'S NPME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 0'00nnell, Brigham & Partners 3505 Cadillac Avenue - 0 -110- fosta Macs rA q9f;9f; -- X714) 55F —gPA0 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: James R_ Wartling n'n,innal_j.,, P.rinFam LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) N /E /C Seventh Street & Milliken Avenue ^ A P N -229 - 261 -70 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PER"lITS: I -2 ��l PROJECT DESCRIrTION ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA JkND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Project Area: 2.26 Acres DESC?IBS THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLP.NTS (TREES), ANI97ALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCP.IPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Subiect site is part of the oricinal 75 acres nnrrh;;ePe in 1Q79 Dy R.C. Inaustrlal Company and subseou ntly tlevelone,i a- the Rancho Q:ramon a Distribution rcntar, w ;ijrh D Pnt hnc R r of occupied sozce in a master F)a e nnri �uc:t rinl develegnent PrQsently_ the Cito is rmeergei Iiat active arane vine- and hat no Other distinauishing features. r _ Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant envirormental impact? &-/:;L 1-2 E WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X i.. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services ( :cl.ice, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or ger`_eral plan designat -,o :s? _X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: (1) Transformation from an active_ vineyard irti, gra ed building pads inVOWTWT-Cut: a _the grades necaasACy to—prQvide for ground 1pyol and do k high capabilities. IMPORTANT: I£ the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I herelly certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information sav be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. I\ R.C. INDUSTRIAL COMPANY ® Date 7119/84 r ignature �_� na i -giant Title Authnrized Cionator I- 3 2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANC170 CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -35 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 7TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL /RAIL SERVED DISTRICT W'.iEREAS, on the 27th day of July 1984, a complete. application was filed by O'Donnell Brigham and Partners for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of October 1984, the Rancho Cucamonoa Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with Each of the applicable provisions of the Industriai Area Specific Plan and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on October 24, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -35 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: &' i q PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Dense landscaping shall be provided around the parking area in order to screen the area from Milliken Avenue. 2. A screen wall shall be provided between Building A and B. The material and design of the wall shall be consistent with the building elevations. 3. The finished floor area of Building A shall be no greater than 100± elevation in order to facilitate the drainage on the west side of the building to go to the south. 4. A retaining wall shall be constructed along the west property line by Building B. The exact length of the wall shall be determined during the final grading plan review. 5. Any roof screens that are necessary shall be architecurally integrated with the building design. ENGINEERING DIVISION: 1. Due to the existing Metropolitan Water District easements on the site letters from the District are needed showing their ap)roval of the plans prior to any permits being issued. 2. Driveways must be completed prior to occupancy. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1984, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST:_ Rack Gomez, Deputy Secretary I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify t'tat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r a -)S N .°n C u r ✓ •r L N . i N < l _ _ T 'J = < _ C C ` = P _ d 4 •J 01 . >•i. .V. T.n�� 0� Vy� G C OT p T � O9O p G �GL C C G� ` +w CG�MD +UL -2 cc T e`!� _ Ar TN rr a9VV ocr' >• ?r q�. Q i g n O O V^ V y n � � ✓� C O = a i O� 4 y✓ ` L ✓° i T� V O _Ud _ YQ_ wJ ✓1' °.` � 00 C`fN T`✓ w..w L ✓` Q -y L_^ o.mr n vq on Gin G� CJ n a ✓ O •O ✓ l^ n O C O 9 E N LL. ✓ L O d q 9...L 4 _ T V •. w @� _Or _�N.e Q �NCr TQ VmO CV 9C�_n G G PG✓ J �d Q CV d?�T d C^ r✓ L p O V b 0= w L V O V _ l @ w.. V � U d n O V N �_ d V V G 4 y t r V O ✓ C O^ V O � C � n O OL �' C I �° L E N �' q �fi N��Nnr PO_c _ ✓''<.^.. i`U gT'Ln Ee �..� !/ . OV Z.- T J.`y _Tr UC•Ca Ow_ .wVO gC}LL P p�T O C •0 r V ✓ C V O L C d� 4 �� P n 0 4 q n <• i 4 •n � ^ L✓ O -cN �F ✓dc u .... = y iv v.L. � �6Nc V�d _ ✓r2 —M o' d so c+E c c c u, c c •. 22 � cdi a L• 9 � N •Nn V L V^ �✓ V G � V T<_ C _ O CNr NO�r ¢V yC 'O C� cpo C_w�C �_ 6o =bj0 n__P L V 3 L nNd dLL <G O✓ 6Gy d qL_ N�'Lr q • C yyEETM qT� avN NT - cq L. c >o c L. Lni �.✓�. o- TN n<_c .s 1.9 ^ L✓ .• V o O V n^ O L OO__J l0_dT_ pn bra nT= . na ` N T O n✓ d O> p V S O C 6 T� T V �� N O ^_ n G✓ L L 9 Oa may. T� Tr`�.'C SOP �OV✓`V f4J� rC <fi <^ OTN O —_ G G L ✓ y 9 N p'p C O V O N C G '� Y •� n° fiV O O b q a N d 6 4 O a �4�d.�nC wr.°. ✓ y �N4 Oq �E VL 4' _OqO� `9•nC � �_.4d L S- i U� -� C T .d+ i C I w= 0 N p d r_ ✓ q a d T V � 3 c y T✓ 0 4 r w. l •J S C_ - _J n N i u7i ` V v � w' _� r ✓ d >. d L C rn d `�Or. •.C� >Li d_ —O =� �I 4`4H4_ >_4 _ y _ _p ^ L n_ V L C r C V' 7 .—j• V✓ N C L L pn Q J L O O V_ + 4 d Y �6C3N 2j_ O� OOp tY <N_Vri CO m _t nL nV < 6tG pi 0 1 _ _ 2-..2 Nc'c NE-N. VJI� � N� } ncN ✓� N € Sg a 8 o`riVT�o�n ✓ tJ C n i L � V TCO C� 4 N O V Tn9 � AO u _ og =— N_.'�_ Is 4p � • 6 p O Oy O T I d J` _ ✓ L d� V_ q O L Y N � 'S � 6I � ✓ C O CnCoy N E W n l C y � 4�TO�OLn u I F V J P 9 L b p . ` ✓ '� LO`yONgQ `O QV✓ V —G�r \\ Z ��•J P O y V TG✓ G T A qp� NLVi��N 4`4 t d • ^f <' O JO � i � 1 � � E E u LS 9d C _ E �` .°. C a V e°= ':Z- cc Z dS_ML LML wdn> dr. q CqC 9rdiC —rdJ uP`y LL OCC N L° V >OC V eO Qi OTC° =D_d« ¢w =e. >.4S 4NN V ->f l V N N V Oc E C u u T u C r n L V L O v O L L G L ° CL D° 9 L V 2 w 0 L... C d N u '•' .J 7 ..r _ L N' \ _ O pp c ; d%L i -_�^ a �•�>. ^ud ca \• -\r L °� «dc4c r° «a'<o.�.• .op TrT'Z NpO Pzl wL..D.Yi.�fO «L ^1. _G 2t.; = cSWyy .J,._v` J C ° Lo d z t. L ° °W °d 9Y O^VM �9 PE ird SrN qA> LE 190.° `N�� OJr�P ai uW x ¢� dr -o =_i � °c ¢�•va, <LMO if «�mJ °c V L•Ta Oi- YVL i v PVC _V— Q � ` L L6 O ^LL `LL�Z C' VVrO E 'c V L e d L O r — i • L^ .. r N �. L t` p c• _ 4` c j —_ .r. f. ° t y _ _ " ^ S. O r O V° «�L .Si.ir ¢._ Boa ca 1� ° ° -L .`.svcc >, ui �N - < =` =_•e ... LP c= pr \ >4 E _ 9 �7 C ^�. 9d r�V L�•u 4` _VL^ <. C a O y drL q J c Tq \N.O >.NO >rC 9 4VC� pC.q 9'LV N Vd O L C 7 P C Z a° Y r_ c s 4 v C• c � q V G_ c v .. E V rj 4 L Q• d\ =_ P 6 r O N C V C 9 C C O Y > _ L °E,p3 q02 «4 W - -r.. a ° ^rn �L wO 1 00 �•� � c ¢�VViL New 6u �.L..0 Gm �-.P -� ��i N° rC�rEO zr Ve2 6 ;:5z d Q�17 E E u ^^ YJ — y . L L C G P d P V .-. G p 1••9 cq G V •I N'O d . 9 °l W J y l S P N_ V V C P -F. � J• .rr C V d t y° V ¢ O y` r fi° d Y � J N C o .Gn N O P y _ M.J' v L •V V '_°: °mme _6� °u .' • °T✓ =c.o.T � � end o_V° Q L P C .o. NJ° p y 9° D° vyo I d wQ g e r �•NL� .✓i•._V C 2 G- o !! G a L C O +7 `gbq_p °_ P 4 O d L< r dG NV ^� L �`.�_ - 2 O p r O G • _. "J l q C �. u q >iC O >• 0� V LO'CC y V yV.rU�q qGL V� 'NON ' ' V Gq1� JLVw r A9 Vp N O d d H C° .qi9 C q 1 C0 ✓ r p V C q S •G.. � V P N C V V p= •GO dCJbp9 N -prq qy O' ...r L.. ` wr °r°✓ q Et dgYV d q .G.. ✓r9 ✓ C V b .� Lr < G < � u �roO g d - w N N NOO L` Q L V •' N� l N� 0 - C q d _� •J - N •% n. ° W J we 4� V, O vd..=n 9< d = L G � N q u..,p..L. -° r O O r .- C O C r N O l r >' G L < q 'G O G ° <" w ✓ N C✓_' = L w r V �i y e CGq O d e a ` 7_ P -Ldd T dP- G Y L� w �.. G e e r ° y _ C N C T P_ � P S q i. O r � •p0 �\ Y 9 w ` N i C d q O v_ 9 E O' ` ✓ Y u - n P � .gyp C C° e o P0_yp Q - ^_ ^o O_9yC <.O- TPO'�r ��'•1uP V w9� C -O?r NOVrvy N NLd �2 O gprC4 r _6C .r ✓ V l_� r✓✓ OV- �Jqq _ CyVyq �V lV'°CO L� V9NCQi 4 9 r_L CP {.Oi dpV pN SJ- Li- d P d a O _Cc y -_ r r y C N q T - q p •� - NS V p✓ OY ♦pL 6 l Val N �v r0 cC J w u 6r Pr � d 0 _ l p !y •o` `w o- r J D u a°Y �'•-�— o e -E` O qq q qG✓ P60 S6 -d� I Ve 9 N PN r 1 LTO.0 °yp =y =q�` Lr < C! �• 1r �d =� q0 D GN O ✓9N 9r �I L• r Pu Or °� p; _O C O< 9yh V `1 i N W N O ` (r� l C C 9 V 6p w C N y G n •O ~ Vf .'V.. `+J "' �- N O V6 O° ..O +� O NL rdOC pppN d ^q L w w C d p C o C V< l N V C O 2,5 °_ I 9 y l q i N r G_ CL• d 7;.s y V t I O II s• N 9 V � S a M 9 r �✓ O O L V D _ p w� r ¢ C S C L= C d y N T M 1 C � O �' -V 6 aw v G•'n0 rV C N dp O _✓ ° _< ✓ O M a� q _✓ c d C 9 C [.1 C q= ' Ey 1 roe+ M �� � w9 N.n g?v ^J Y_ j°. = ✓^ '" �-. q✓ ` P V .-i� C 2 1 u L` O q p� J �.O C NI ° L �� _ uNi q` V C r V-i• g P Cd d � V v1' �r nJ 6l` ° NCwL �g dG NN ..•� L PLP 4 O �� r` V N r C - J V O Y �V�q r P✓ ` `9u w 9 V e - y`O rO PPd JG qL 4 > G ��.r.Y EN p:+p wYD _ V p C- = oy V• > -` .W..G ✓d r Li r .J. a y p T i V L V- L OL G O Y d 1 V 9 C N O •� Z J d w Y � < O w � p yp. < 1..f < � r M � V O w_ w p w C W 4 O 6 I N✓ N i w < w� 3 M O � N Z r ' � •'^ h !q f M �� V � N n • C C7 env c a- .4y cq'gc 4s - oc 4 v4 LP a 4m4 -OI GCq cc cc �� 00 r_L J =q NL rr Vy b AOL YN qN ^ ✓ Y• ^ Tq E V = V r 6 4 -`> L q- V= P -� dON �G `J y Y• a a Cu` Y.L 0.L N ✓L 1J L DV C La v yqe a .� v q b Vq �•• L Z F°o c � qi 4 W o `D Sr:.: �c .e ... ✓� o✓n Scd 'c° Onl '-' = TO' � �. = = V T S `� Y ••• ` a • CNN {ni S V r Cn tY N P4 Si VO a -VC r� - Q q� V M ` ✓ Y d V - O d � C O V n L� C i r -C�= P y Gb C3 =✓ GOR.bP ✓ CI` V LQ Lp rN 9u C a TENE O-EY r LG ffjj rydgd6 GC C=✓•.L `q 44 bu VE b d �OdE b rV �E wN•oL rq Nd Cg4�V q CL � qp r� �i IUD✓ gVdV > nJ'nP ipr y V•sL V0. ? Crr 4 - LV r.7 �C 6�Cr n. yOi Od .Cd `6 pr 4 F V -✓ Cr ✓ G � n ru V V`r O V C T 9 G r q � P V u V C OG,TLr � L L w✓ ^_ r V- P 4 V nu JL V _L er OgYbr q r^ j0g0 .L 4 V G• .1 _ _� >/ Q�pVI VC aC �O y S� ^CS V ' ✓, Te 0 G w Y C V N^ V C V V N Y J N y= Ppap O� fJ ��rt ✓ O COOL f MFf �9L pO L tV O q V N r C✓ C N N �� V k' V p n _ P• LVO � GP O L =` O Lrl ✓�✓ TVPp '� VdY O OG a•q L✓ r _O �r ^�Li„ q i G✓ �Gw YL q ie C'q� =iN PE r✓ N .r- l.N -.Oq Yy6L 4 r oib uP- Y PN =C -r � VbU -q✓4L �VWi C6V9 d O� CP -pb M O_ -`� V O� 0.Jp�GrN -q�0 N N• 6Vy Wry W ULO,I En CI NI 1 Q ' V ✓ qV .uP V YT q -fib TV V y 2 r N O � y�- r` q O q` ✓ b _ b -- ' �O l � er Vie y CP 1 r=L_S CVV 1 < y V � �4 ly •L V C V CO r- d •n Ems' 4 N yNtVE HOC Y O n 9 ` N cCCL d✓ q 1��`pon' O e= 6f,� O N V� V V � O F E L iV Fq S p` El VN O VCA J r Chi V- dC9 b V O 0. C O C •` V 6 r C r S e . y C ✓ d C O �} � Id 4 Q NTH V �S bYW E-'n� N^ vC` G CSC � y. LVC 0 V -> ` �rV a rC LO UOS _ {•r✓F O L 'N O Y N a V ^ P• O r V G. u ��`` l ! Cp> •� E �C• � C H Y `V c0 v0 Dew r- - q� r O ME -VN �Sn L= L C Tyr N 20 O d _b L i Y _ 40Y N L C S v •n C C N✓ C O< `. V r 4 � � y C V .. r • y M F V <^�E �O vyio in erg r✓ c.. p �Cbm d_ �C•acp •� .o- ^, G N r CY ��� `b PE l Orp w MprG m l- O` J^ rl VC Cr rrfai Vp -TC <• \ � { I rCrC+ Yrp C6O _ O V W'E �I Z • S c v ^ Q_ tai u .. O O. I? •� O I 9 a r O V r C V 4 C M � O V L T T C N C J = C P L Z M g mG -'ur O F T •�D L_G j11 QL c 1 i'- 5.2 C O C O O y p M G U C V 5.1 c C C f C O 9 N O L G L r C o yu I O N c J C a a i i N a, ^ O p � r C V L r "z °u Vim- CL � 1� + 4S CV r� Vt�v PVG i �i O' d1 �_NNVN Eq x�°r 1 .N °L 1 uo 6n OSd ¢r OIL q a - SL O Q09 1 nLU (Vr 6Vi ..�5 V 9Na[ KL E Q 1f1 OJ O. O s L C S L 6, O V r C ... C L N w V m L G P N> e! L V G r < a �O 9 V N .°.. C V N L90d Oo r E V VO.N P pO V i o u D E =° o icu_ Lr aq e L d.c .� °COQ aO cL —r N9 <C r.pD .V+4 Lr_ O' -j C9 rW'L"' r9Z uTCNCV J 4 dp Q O r Z q P ` 4 O O r i 9 N C 5 CO P O � l C •-i = 4 O O c V E .n C r° e c° P r%-. a V N p - r = .- V •U. c L L L P p^ C C ^ N d N O t S L � 0 i n Y rf " , N r ° VN rV � c t . aU o = o= T a I.E — l z O � N C 6 q N 7-0 V L7 O r r � • d D qrE PO 6 OQ »C PLO 0 PO -0, 2' c t� N 9 ^ 4 W �. G y _ O O T� n V Y O 2-_ C r r� O LN -V -6 --JOO (per NO - -� n �'°E C�E.Vr L �' pq rC V OOE \A 6q wr M190 = 4 i C O O OI o{ 1 1 a C� C O C O P C v r r V l � �e u 1 C C � N ai ��Ga � `o a V u Tr C C a ^ n `l c opt p o✓ _ — .` C N N CV 6 O O T P J O C r C L> > N L E V V C C r O E ` •^ - V � W V •� u u O r ^• r Vf] ao ` naN _ o � iOOV a� caTr ^ r r _ C C �V ` PV N •Li• .. u L C �' C G g a 2 r O 9 r C a �V O •.r C L N!1 V G✓ M G L 0 � .� rnd ^a V q iV V_ N u ✓ q C '° V P I Y C' t 6r .°i � t V V q F t V •Gi• C C C V L O` t T r V T G ✓ V 4 Ou•.r � Vi CVJ9 6 q V q •-n✓ ..N 6L u V O• G N b� d V O _1 1 � 4 1• L C � .� C 9` q O C C _ 9 N V V O V a q O q 8Y E y r a ✓ `V qy rnTa✓L MV Cd yl Wy dG Cr .L O L ✓ r°y 9 ^ C � � V S V 00 °N l_ T O -2a I � E r`r q 0 C L� P N u Y• COC ` � G a. V. � - I ✓✓ L E U 6 E � d 9 'O ` M •0 C N t a rpr O N C- O V 9 r q N t S T L d C v C •+ N H � V R O l V C ECI. d rT.IJ• i Va r^ V IN tM l v C•aP q�u �L..b d }w°ii 04 ya r� N� Vq ✓0= N9 d •] V` 6 N� C - q ✓q 4> =rr �r V�� ° ea 6 ib V P u_ P ° V O• L M e r r G r. P_• ° E a`ri•u .n d r ` p •I PI � 6a� VDT' C 6V 6� Wr NV Ly :26 VV C' �'V C ra✓ C G N t M S p `N a C� C O C O P C v r r V l � �e C u 1 C C � N ai ��Ga ' a V u Tr C C a ^ `l `G p CV 6 C a ' V V C C � W O r r Vf] C ` N C ai ��Ga a Tr `l `G V .. u G U _ 1 _u`1`Y ` ✓ O 9 uCL 6^ V ' °N °P I � Y ^c GO C •+ N H � V R O l V C d c M O E M l u •] G f V y C C r V V�° P N a ._ L r V = 6 � nlGr °e ° e E a`ri•u .n •I PI � C C 1 a 0 Z -Y1 U C7 i d 11 P^ c g O r O u y O O i 1 $ > N P� 2 � ¢ r gLOV o c p q V L V q N z d � R O a``oNU a a _ g C V L n M r M a V f o.Nq v` L' E n�J ` � d a G r C = r0 `� ml �i O Op O L O 4 .L.. b J . Md d > Y c � O � q C Y C L �u L Y .I l L r V L L V `•�Z E- Y aV u^ O P u!,• v Y C qr N q r ^^ w ae L L 9 V r •°n V °1 V E C v°. Su O� yW a� 04 O P^ c g O r O u y O O i 1 $ > N P� 2 � ¢ r gLOV o c p q V L V q N z d � R O a``oNU a a _ g C V L n M r M a V f o.Nq v` L' E n�J ` � d a G r C = r0 `� ml �i O Op O L O 4 .L.. b J . Md d > Y c � O � q C Y C L �u L Y .I l d L L O 9 4 qc qe e q � i q O O E s i IRA V pq <e J V Q w L a L g_ P V l i C N d w i w ! V 6• n C 7 O y 9 O N a > v a N w r M v � e _ v e y N u y _ O V M �n S O O w o - E V P ` o i O ° v qeC N O C — q V d q E Y Y � G � V n J y w l V J L I i n l L r V L L V Y aV u^ O P u!,• v Y C qr N q r ^^ w L L 9 V r •°n V °1 V E C v°. Su O� yW O • n 4 d E V N L > LT GY q^ Cr C q l V r V V J Yr r V �2 �F Li.q _rrA j rJ NN � V^ �aei— J� O� OVq !VJ V^ Y y— J l d L L O 9 4 qc qe e q � i q O O E s i IRA V pq <e J V Q w L a L g_ P V l i C N d w i w ! V 6• n C 7 O y 9 O N a > v a N w r M v � e _ v e y N u y _ O V M �n S O O w o - E V P ` o i O ° v qeC N O C — q V d q E Y Y � G � V n J y w l V J L I i n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w>Jon D. Mikeb ChaAft L Bugwt R leffrer King FtidardbLDaW Pamela j. Wright THIS I9 TO CERTIFY that the aicrophotographs appearing on thus Film -File are true, accurate and camFleta reproductions of the re- cords of the City of Rancho Cacsmoaga, a msaicipal co- poration, as delivered to and in custody and control of the City Clerk. It is farther certified that tha a ttcrophotographic processes were accomplished in a Samar and on film which meets with the require- meats of the National Bureau of Standards for permanent aicrophotographic copy. Date photographed:_ $ �'— e-7 Camera Operator: City 9928 BASUM ROAD. SUITE C i`OST OFFICE BOX 997 • SANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALWOBNIA 91730 • (714) 98S -:e5t