No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/01/13 - Agenda Packet-02 0 1 -13 -88 Planning Gomi ssi om o 1 Of- 4 alcAto cn-T OF Ah- k 4'pFt°',e4 �'✓�� � � •. �" tG' 4�icE-- ��w?ti.S'fr1C7C�'i.�C'T.___�,r .��L - .i� � _ r p� Z AGE� AMAS Ira, XJ*DJ* PAW COUK#Wff ox i ay. A� U i� C:atmw ift= 4t',t w�3n� to � r,�ct4�. � � yAU obit d nto d an by tw ' Commi tit S2y`i , �1i�rii, 1 *M Td AW t4tl trt�Md a w �rr OV DEMAL A" CC) Akwuffr 7 VE { 1 38�, 'l8 1tra �u ikft , an st 150 A:.a 4 ot lot (2-4 �Wg v �totat �i.. tw1�,s pbr = tint s�fda � Wit► t .c�#" Y Jltcset - AF�Nt Q4."�191 4 �f6ttod Wi tha da ;arlt to � �ireer ti►c: rt of fo' .. #) roature upm , (all 1 L 7 O � If D6 } l { ° ;� ✓ IL Ij XOR ,t x `«• •• � ewl -�3� to r t•} 1 of an I t M cad sloty to two stories Within X00 � feet of � lw r� i for a pr*txw 20 unit v{ (.` apsrtra t tyro a c }mot M, of is Md in Uib MWi€ M -lfth �ti� i xLet 1 2 unitz per semi, xouate3d at the termhuts" of Uerrra Madre Aw i Main et - AM 20- 251-22. nw- foUOWhW iterate iai4 p� tic lmrbW 61, which ognceriwd i�.di ds ;: their dpinton , the r�aiaud ptsor* -L - please 104t to be ,4CCjjVTiXe!d j� *�i 'I LpWtLWrost the Comm at Vatf � L� rf et jl� ` .4 u''� Qp�r4wM, aitalt be ittrtited to ` mifttsa per indtvtdtQ kll a t i ct= o fl T ANO, .T ATrq TRACT 135fi8 f 1� r �� c�aeLopcaeb2 �:amisr � �y �e� ++yy hi tba� �5,.t*Olm Rod4or,s,tyAW.. :District {0 fee 104ted on � 'aide of �ft Aid it e, 325T of trek m- AVWa 201- 4T 4 -;lg. froVn Uwe 25,10 , (( D. EF,"irY�Cll�iil�i '1 ` 1 +�.E M' .wD !'��iy�KTATM TRACT 13727 Orl In ' *ntf�i�+�t {�'-4 dwe aaa>7�ta. p r ad. 1 Yt� t wd�west r of aft t Street Od =11MM - Next 201- 214-Il 19orttine+ed ftm' O Decal 9 1Si$�i,. Zf r$ONPUt;PMAL AMMN'%j�+2tY "� AN�'Tt ii9Qi!'i'E6'E TRACT 12358 1�" its VWY Lnttr DttWty !Re d&OW �atdct (lea iota n 2 L QhV Per acre),` iraeatad on the east side of sti`set, sszutl7 0l' iitl2stcla4 � .� AFttt �d�6i�- 891 -8, i� ari11. \ I3o�t►'etei MM flktaemiar, 13157] RdlaWl Rifer 'tia:- iaatu+e 97- F. B VION ITAL. A8'3M811 Eiv AND VA(RUNC E all-if, -� ' muaianatnt av� , t'oct , xeeet ill to 2Y;3g7�-� feat in ages coat Mct$M With a attar qe� g�� located On tact a #At else of Ott, WO of ,;�f!%itirt i� - !idiot 2Q#1-681-14 °ate 11. (C€wt ittued from December 9, 1#m"; RGW04 pi%i, b Tentative Tract 1 385. I ilk U _71i T y., K. ViR —OM id'IFAL ASSOMENT Arii7 ItoknitF VA1P :cam ;mot tc" p'fvr�"s I�,.sti J" tot'ia Vineyards N&th -comm ct � �Ao� #� rtit trair'�rth �ticiet�f.�fot�sri�r � Tr. `';SBIVIRONY4tMAL I ASSMMEXT AA57F '4' I'IA'i`t R,'`T'�A-R�4I5I+'4 Faak i�evoiop f'( t out, 7 ap ` voma* stmt, W4 UU, 2� air- P& MMONMINTiV E'N'.I,'.A.�N TAI 'TRACT 13821 "view LOW o ' -9410 am is on „ of Umd th the I�tiai D14sw# th ;.;I %s .uDita 6t aere)� Ioosted ' At the orth± wrner oP m 'bra — Qd� - APM 201 IQt-�@ tad i i t is zmovet Permit S :,the` Mmtoyat as l 1, Matt Eo **Ptus tree$. `Rah►ted Flies Vaiamo+e 57 -17 r N. ENVII;CENMOTAL ASSFS3MIiI;`T A%Ti3 tA7 AY 8'f 7z - Nti . request to rodUee the eqAte-4 yed se "feat to 9 feet for are lot of se $eVln 10- d tsion on 5 a" of Tared In the V+a�ty Low VwldnCt li i` rAki4at (ie W, :*?M g dw6ufre wilts per A )", 10oated At th,e - morthesxf oorroer of Harms Avenue and t'iiiisWO ROW - AfTz 101-101444. Aelate4 FRat 7eatatiwa T met 13321 Muff -�i'rT _64 HAL D I - 1e de�FeiK18t3tglt. tle0l seta gat o . +mot oYt 2.27 acres of hs GerW4 "tait'iai Mdriat (Subam 103;, 3ocatea eat. ,3 sxsth t d"t, of 4th Str4ot (Ifr#ed3 end CIev6UAd. Av�tsa ECENVMO - IM A dHn Ax-D ilDTS� Trio' Li AN- AMEWbMRNT%- U44, > attet e11E tt �I10 A6!'ltt i�3lgiiZLt 4E€ �Ilttt Ft�C' t�18�f38'[� �ti ', " serific iftWOW 10 to OIIM nati CUVOIW Aventm, rra to J of 7th 5trftt, - APM 209 - 272 -82r '. (, BNVIROXMISHTALV ASS i` iiVEi, IMANT Co Or AMEND aenm �r1 ., o �� acct ._ I9avelopns nt C4dO lrtai ing to: puking 1-it and rP��P�i�}',aTr1L .�1'�1311.'i�ll�E r >�Eti$lt W3' pLAW �5 "di.S 1 i Y , ti �APk i�{1� �titll laF�w '{um R�s� 4,4-8 ' . �< V, 4z per t l P.W(w g (w 1 (� kyi x¢+ c �c3'ry�a� nr <A.iiS m# �s sf tta�p :- a y t�ytxyt acuth '7A4fR,O�itl JQ A#1��,%� Pwxdr vf i i of ��i4 M — AM" i s..;1Q'^� 31-,,� lt/ i�GAIRSCf :� 11 ASS?S!F �d \L+` �+�Tiatars ��� 10 SVNmd UA d�veii3r� � tusr act} ��t�I�d! rtiktt #ts�s �Ien#oe � #��c sl _ F�.strir�t {SY��""!s } tc�'t�s�;ae +�if��•tttr �r :fly aar tlt J[�ed* %i�'ir�i _ oii tbs �sida �� �i2d9er Lir1a 1, nest of � Arran p �8e1ai a+�= �e +'Jtd[$YiC � 1,l4t1 °�R �t'il► -° {`` c, !a�tlium iA93itl4i8�`'��°$ 2Atis for 1.$9 � a� � la�i ratr tii� s��t �i+s df 1�rchibeld >4.�eaues�' �i•�t%i� e'1 E?�e�"ttbs�',fly 1fl8'f} S+1R 9 0191 EN Y. AL Sei! • V AND - —ZV t .C11i1i11 J. rcceestto Ofq—tSF-lb- vtr. Ni�?Q- modium PAsicleAud E� tie (.cm. u Per 40W to oftiee = Imo; *a&si to a1 fas i.C+9 ae r r 2a tied an OW *+,� side of r� Val A ttb of Lb*';Ro:W -J It 20"31-17t ; 54), 56, 34 arxi 8 ;1 Cai►tirssttsci` hs r* ember 9 x,987) & 10BPiAB�p E8A2 87-02 r "4t?itE16iTfi e :�i�ten . ' o W4 TAC .D4Ye16; le: int d+ tiara fad the purgo* of provkft s Son* Hou0 -nr Ara t pj� a* reqdmmerlts,$ ft .% feria = UXstrigt (S "Um 1'F. fl.fl4i} of the Nvojo .at rt iaaciatf ,r�wir�rnage�,�2�T��'I} �1,7�,��Dp,�r�f, �taue�y iC:s t�ke� +a,�tytty:�e /yatn �LS� afik �t.�4Q •aM+F+•%i'�g -i i�.3 � �•i4fittlq(� "' �SA�3 +k}/iT`":!.. c� 3. Ei� 1+TbY'ERi, 14ii4tlil�i`�` �i'3 `f'bi1'!'1'4`11,'3,r Pint* k f a ti$ PR.fi s the watorla Pwvf:;�Ci G attittatiix t a iftated at .tile ar st# t earmr of fctinyw way ri..e�.... �.�a77 x.w77i-77• IS-7 O fp!f+(!�' 1L i r4 S', Helimari � 1- oaasTCaiafortt a flat. { {qworuez.;ADta i set- 44 SSw4C -04, t it Debra Meyer Ll;tSt of Rancho Guca�&-- Tit f.>3af 807 �*i 1 Rancho Cucamonga] lik �� 47141 9a9-1851 F - Ms. Meyer, am •rdgucsi.smg that the ,Plannii; Co"mssioit teeting oe reschet#.ded to Wed-mm-lays 3amary cos 29Ei3x , ;oG committees, first *.:.... tc, rAcL-E the Srad ,ng and Deeig> Rwvieri T4ankl, yact 'for your F_tieTit%. Rich.iwd P. Ayoub1 Sack fladsen Ray Brton j Pa`�r Lynch Fr 1. AL e _ ( J Gtl1'yCpp+f Ry,A`N#ppGFNryCtI[ *}}y��?i+ g' 4tlY�Py4 JAN`�1)I,r:Fi f V ti L - f/ "ill J i Nis 0 { C) its is J j 85441 ARCHFBAID, SUM 8, RAN �''rf 0 ClC CLsM�ICi ia. f � 41730 171a�� 9 0-22A a , r Q Ja xuary 13t, 1488 d ruTO Aij ` 3faixsos� t1 .. S�or Civil C$h of U}14 6 _cucai6 ;i d C B'rm- ., Steven Tord o i'rfaject; NfCcrtr3 a tswaards ?ortia Subject. Tentarl" Varcel trio 111¢96 = - Gear BarryQ: Pursuant to, our teleliphone convpxs4at-ion'earlier +tads re a diz 1` r sulr ec! ,' a accept t6 c,ondit'iout,,�''o! thIIa propoaad res6lution. T would eery mach a�rPreciUlf1i your i} i s convey,-;, �i -, ¢l+,ia . letter 'to t ea � 1 commisz:io,n at it's hiaetivg` a,pn$Sfit ,along viWh Our re�saest for thi j commission 's conditio _Aal apFroVaal Of the 5e�i��uC P n for Parcel lisp 11106. jf I Thank you very muck. ; ;car. jrour help regasdift this matc*:r:- .tpytfuxl) / s i teven Forth L Project Manager': 1 d ,, IN, � } Ad' '' � Ott � _:� . • � ��j�_ 19 MAP�1 904- 36•2.*e at �q is . POIR. PAN. 33 � par.. Eris ,Alts My milli I it MOXCIT SUE t P�A11 llMgll�' � A • ark wl.._, �. `I , .�:�. �cw�» }. wj a art ti_, 3313 Alr: tsa to ,. ft. 14 „ eR owl* t its NtfIG 4. ,l*1` r /at stake a� rom*. '.I w n �� REPOUCAKONGA ORT° 0 x January 13, '1980 Y x? + • Chairman ktd Members of th- M 1:c anning issiorr _ FROM ar�d 8016r, City Manner BY Scott Wrphy, Associate,.?] aftner $0040 "i: RESOLUTION OF DElIAL FOR EKYIRiMMMM AaSE3SNEXT M e era ok n o a sc ipoi arc "`f + of a itt,SM'square foot adsinittratipn building,, a 18,170 n square foot warehouse building, Od-a 1C#6W sure foot Lranspariatia;n,► aNainter nce building on 3.25 acres of lan4 In the Low Residential aistrigt (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) „,30rated on the' "east side of Beryl. Street, south of 19th Street - APR '2C- 0411tH and 42. Associated with the developtant is a Tree Removal Permit re01jesting the removal of four M nture trees, On December, 9, 1987, the pli'Wo.2 Comission d�ndugted a public hearing tq\1receNe all input and test1mogy on the proposed levolop t Ra't _ cobsideriing all pertinent y,,infbms tioo, the Planning Comissi`� dete.Oned that, the sc'naol.4ftltrict facility was not An appropriate uie in a t *sideotial area. P0, the Coeraissiora felt, that the architecture was not co+patible ati dire residential character of the area° its .a result, the Coals ion directed staff to prepare a,Resolution of Dental. Attached. for your miew and .adoption is the tkaiclation of Denial for CUP 87 -4ua Res, full*re 1 4, r ; f $Ba SN: to Attachwent -- Resolution of:l�tria�? `� r U al U%doLi)9.`Iov or m. plat 3l at c SItx or TM CXTY OF lA1S or A ctOMT,2103" TPSB 1'+SR' UT, t:`:2,ar ±c 1 19811✓ or J M AD* 13T3 TOW t!Ics, �ovex301110 xNa"' �t$]t1 3it? j guIyTyyeq m 81-DR 'y.py��y{��?�CxU�CyBl�dgtigla v�►�TaY��py►o�{ �r .mall A. M ,Alta, T-004 Schoot oistrict-;taz filed an -application z'equeaating t"he Usuancs of a cgnditiOMI? gees fttAit� VZO, 87-41 to UpprOve the d0kv#lQPWMt of a SCU001 i district facility " described alcove in thta title of t3,41s $1isolution. Hors. inafter in this Resolu'rion, thg iUbject conditit'hatl Us* remit ro gist shall, be xeferred to as a "Application" E (ii) on December 9, iS-87, the Planning commission of the city of 20,t0ho Cucamonga s,onducted a duly noticed public hearing on the, Application and said p4ibli r: hearing wren concluded Prior to the adoption of this R+esolu�:ian. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior, . tc tn` adoption of this Revolution have occurred. Now, TH9,0WORS, it is found, diterm neRd and resolved the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follcvs 1. In all ;reacts an set forth in the Recitals, c Part A, of this Resolution. Z. Based upon the substaratial evidence Presorted to the Plarnning commission during the abova-- re&e!anced public, hearing, i ncludAngr 'written and oral acts. f rapOrts, t0asther with Public testizo. v, this Comm !,4sion hereby, speoxx`ically f s as ,follows: The Applicattton, applies to_ approxiubte�,�35.25 acres oaf vacant land within the l,ou,32es ident ;al gia�riat lacaCeC3 on the east side of Betel Street, �sCast ^r`:t7 0, Nistaie?ih Sti¢est; "tit � _. _ -_ . _ .... _. .. _..,_ _ - _,_._.-• _ _ _ .. Resolution vio« - l' e 2 ' - n i' b. Thi�' property to the north °of the subject sits at Z,ow Reseidential District and is currently with' 'a de eloped developed with a wi,gtrch i`aesility. The property to the south of the subj40lsitEa iws owned by the Applicant Altaac Loma school District, it located within as,Low Raesidesatial District and is f currently vacant. The grope ty to the eaAt of the subject site is located war dirt =a 7acw Residential Diatriat and is currently being developed with strode family reaidenoea presently under construction« The property to the west of the subject site it within a TOW Resid *ntial District and "i# 'developed VJrrG%ftly with singl.a f-A'Ay residences rind certain vacant Property,- c« The Application has been aubm:Lttead to allow tale construction of a sahoO, district facility consisting of a 10,500 square foot a djkinisi�iaation office, as 16;':�715 square toot warehouse buil.d,£xzg, incluelinq Machine: and ca ah�'ga and ax" spray- paint booth as I5 600 s sportett guars foe�4: 'tra��sooxtt►tion/ maintenance building and Volatad parking and itoragrt areas. f School district facilities a3re permitted Within floe Yow Residential District iWith the j approval of a candle bnai trams permit; f I b Y d The Application ass coaatePplated would contradict the: goals and objectiv+as of both, the Car+eral plan � and Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and would Promote a dstriaeental condition to ;:he isrsons and properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject t site, for the reeasolts as follows: � - + ) f? 1z`e. pr6visions of the mineral Plan and Development Code �_ , -Alow the astablishment of school district facilitze3 within'(,/jow Ressidanti,al Districts pursuant to a conditi ©nal vse ;sseranit con:;emplatea the elavelopment of parssive and law intensi�.e facili::ie:ae such as classroom sites and = i administrative offices. That Appli(ation aft conteaapXsted , conflict* with suctc goals a" in p,:!licies and incompatible with the surrounding land uses by they requested inclusion of the more intensive industrial uses such as the transport6tion�xaj etenancs building, the machine and carpentry shop a-id the booth rp:Wy paint i Ths appl.i4aciott as conteanplated would be incons utent and incompatible, with the low Intensity residentI { and church facility uses•. imtediately surrounding he subject sites and would be raterially dear-Imental to l` .y ha ha lt(, safety° aamt :. welfare of those persons in the imma�lirx� h heo - a%ty of st zlnd- ecL site in the following respects- {1 }= lo "ration of the. vehicle i 2 , „ V. 'Resolution so. r, Paga 3 maintenarxoa raccii:4y, teagat h4r with the maot�1-ne and .:eoarpentry shop, wound ener as excessive noisii' and vibraticrc Lz i the area; (2) tyl spray paint booth would ganeratee _bobs' urs*rarrani #Oz odors and pcEeatial hazaxdous contaasination by airborne 'pray hint i partculants; , (3} necssesosary, security lighting' to protsat tthe proposed facility would .result: in excessive nighttivo glare to the surrounding reasidantial,,uses; and (4l evidence produced it the public hearincr de xonsttra -teed that the advertise 4lffects identified herein ,could not'be suuccesafully mitigaxted,by the inclusion of,./development conditions; (iii) hO Application as ccnte mplateed would increase heavy vehicle traffic” from trucks and buses oil, those neaxby, streets whioh are ,normally limiters to residential, traffic, thus. caatributing to excessive vehicle noises and vilsxation and li dangearous � nei. con. fusing traffic circulation pattiex� in the immediate vicir.; ty of the subject suite, the detri�enti effects` ' r of which cannot be Successfully mitigated; (iv) Thse proposed design of the f ad>zfn strative offic+el and warehouse building are aesthetically incompatible with the single family residential uses and church facility surrounding the subjessct mite. This administration building presents s long, massive and linear degsi (approximately 225 feet) tsahich is not compatible *ith the low residential, single fr1ily dwellings in the immediate vicinity. The warehouse building'is a pre-engineered metal vtructure which would only be allowed, it at all, in the heavy industrial areas of the City; M Substantial public 'tessss4timony, in opposition to thee Application was presented at the pub4p hearing by existing, residents in the Immediate vicinity of the subject site (both by oral testimony and signe `j�2tittiony) , dald such public opposition and the detrimental effey:ts identified herein will clu- MUlatively increase due to the fact that the immedi,,atea vicinity is continuing to develop with single family residences and the sate immediately to than south oe the proposed dsvelo ent (cwne'I by the Applicant Alta Lows School District) cannot be developed as a classroom school facility, thus requiri:tq the development~ of further single family residences or the expansion of the proposed uses onto such site. � 3. Based on they susbatan !Aasi''mv3dercea'presented to r this Comission during the *bove- referenced December S�, 1981 hearing and upon the specific findings of fact seat forth in 3 i Resolution No. Fade 4 paragraphs 1 and 2, above, t3ais,��'i�a {�s�i,o7 hereby finds a4a concludes as follower a. Tic Application sAw 1p)rr Vdaad is not,; it conforwnce with the goals OZ4C policieea�� off. the Gene al Plan ai1d Development codas of the C$,tsy of Rancho �.' T as Application as prqposed All be detrimental to tho public health, saf*ty g r v 1,r re and �*ix bos materially injurious to prolaelties arnl impko *eatdsnts in that immediate vicinity: and C. The evidaUce presented to this boxmission has identified substantial pistsntial. adverse ;efferts associated with - 0 the requoist specified ir. the application. 4. ` Based upon the 'findings and cariollasio is set ford in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, above, this "-!)Mission-heraby denies the application. b. The r1er ty Secretary of the'-p anning- Comm3sai«r of the City at Rancho Wca*anga 4�14-11 certify to., th+e adoption of this Resolu;3an. nr cf�vED AZW;,AWPTED tt is 13th clay, of .7anuary, 198(x. 37 PI NNTNC: CQMMTSSJON L?r THE or PANCU6 LUQ'f'-wON6A r - n Larry T. By. - Brad Buller, L*puty Sact*tary 1, BRAD BULLER, Depijty SacrjetAry of the Planning, Commission of the City of Rano Cucamangts, do hereby cartilfy that the foregoiztq Resolution was dc11y and regularly introduced, passed and adopted by this planning polimi,ssic n _,Of the City of ; _ Rancho Cucamonga,. a a ro;ml,ut matting of the FlEtnz3ing Cdl tis"s" Ion held on the 13th day of,JCa4uary, 1989, by the yoll.owing vote, to wit: U r k� �I n � _ f Resolution No. Page 5 NoBs: `tAwOT: COKKXS$XonRa: � t Cs _ n CITY OF RANCHO MQUIONGA. }Z DATA. January 13, 1987 zs TO: Cnairlian and wbera of the Plata n6 Comissioa FROM: Brad. 8c"11or9 t3ty; Planner BY Scott Wrphy, AssociatE Planner SUBJECT: eNVI90MMfk1L ASSTS MT M A iIACE 87-16 F DON - A ` M� requw't Im it ^reASj l e r from one ivtory to two = stories unit 100 feet of adjoining t single faq� aly resfd" *.ncas for a,, ;4 dosed 20 Emit apartment I project . 1.16 acres of 1ant in the Medium-.109h i Residents District (14-24 "Ung units'- per ,acre), { located at, the terminusegof Sierra lkdre. AtMue and Main Street - Avit 207 041 -22. z ,> 1. BlEC9Q 90ilfi6: On t3ec ►t►er'9, 5987, ,'the planning tomiss3oli Gonda ed a p u6l'i'Fiearirg to rersive �inpiyt and testi�sr on the propp red , variance, After , considering ail' per°tlnr!nt infomation, I; e al anning Ccxmission determined, that ,.24ieY`e iwer�' FSOt species circumstances rela`�l,ve to.thi; p,�pterty at would jt�tify approval o." the vaF�:anwe nest, As a result, the P%�nnttg �'oi5sit+n dprected'staff to Prepare r"I 'solution, of Denial, The applicant has Submft� t tan thet wo"Id not require -a variance.. Wowev r, stAff L ;�)a aF►- �pportu »i1:y to review the plan to uatertafae i'p it will r►,. J ' g�ivrm t'e� site constraints, and whether it cor[forgs to all Git Attached for your review jit �kdapttan is the Resolution of- Denial for Variance 87 -16.' It.. RECMUDATIOR: Staff reconmFeq _Ii Adoption of th-A attached- eso u on 3f'D`nial , 4ef FIr"Im ttea, a_ 'rents:' Exhibit A Remised Site P',an ;; h C` a EXhibit .*U" Prelims Cy Elevations 'r °' f CJ (? Resolution of Denial ✓r 111' +� � _•.� ,.J�!p � � '. �t �Y � , E M tiljf - IX �s _ ;•�•. 1 f A I �����, �J � 1 _ ,. i + if 1 1 9 ��+ �•' � , t l'tfttt }l :'.ti:y Y � 1 � ,r �Lt +s.: qt {{}} � 9 1� �l � �ti 1 ` 1 l{ iii �. '� �� ;� 'IYT�. i4 l �. t�T�� lI ��_�. ��,. � � �' � .� 1 r:.�e�- �� � �s t t 1 ft� �t� 'f3 � � ,� �yy�r �yy". °..Y` .JP,.",� '�� _ II - � �� � , ;•�•. 1 f A I �����, 1 _ i + if 1 1 9 ��+ �•' � , t l'tfttt }l :'.ti:y Y � 1 � ,r �Lt +s.: qt {{}} � 9 1� �l � �ti 1 ` 1 l{ iii �. 'IYT�. i4 l �. t�T�� lI ��_�. ��,. � � �' .� 1 r:.�e�- �� � t t 1 ft� �t� 'f3 �yy�r �yy". °..Y` .JP,.",� '�� _ II 1 1lli' dY�i i r .x•� }�1 � 1( ? 3`t ;fl �w.� ��,y�: a+l�rx� t� tj1• .�Yy1 � .� l� {tt{ i� ` Y ±' •Rl� i K ♦♦� !v t � -�f+. f.Jf�. � � � � � I ..I w 0 F;. _ I RESOLUTION Nlo. % E A RL OF Tf€E RloIS:HO CSC -00M PLANKIlep COMISSIQN DENYING VARIANCE W.9, 07- 16,4, 0 IfCR t E THE - HEIGHT OF AN APARTMENT BUILDIHG11ROM ONE "STORY „,*TWO STORIES WITHIN lO0 FEET OF ADJON,' 1tiE SINGLE FAWZY REPDERCES FOR A PROPOSED 20 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT Ott 1.16 ACRES Of LAND Ill THE INEDIUM4IGH RESIDENTIAL DIST2ICT (14-24 DWELLING UaIITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT 'ME'T£!R11NUSES OF SICRRA MADRE 4ENUE AND f?lA.IN'- STREET - APR 207- 251 -22 A. Recitals. 1 ti) Peter - SO 6 hes, filed an oppl Icati on f'cr the issuance of the ` 'variance No. -*' -18 as described in the title Of thil Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the 'ubje application ". Variance request is referred to as "the 00 101 December 9, 1987, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date, (iii) At,5 "legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resol�stinn have occurred. S. .4:isol ution. 1401f, it is hereb; found, determined' and resolved by the Planning CO=isSiOn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows-, I. This Coo� ssion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recit�C'1s;�Part A,, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Bated )lrpon substantial a�tidmce presented to this Commission during the above- re %-ff enced p0lic hea%inj ou December 9, 1,987, including written and oral reports, together roith public testimony, this' Cowission hereby sp�ewifically fin's as follfts« (a) , '� T1:e application applies to property located at the terminuses of Sier,�_Madre Avenue and Main Street with a street frontage Of 142 feet along S14rra Madre and a lot depth of 140 feet and is presently unimproved; and j (b) 1 . The property to the north. of the subject site is designated for mu ti- family uses 'nand is developed with a single family residence. The pr perty to the south is owned and operated by the Atchison To0eka and Santa R&Ilr0&A-f The property to the east is designated and eVveloped with single fijv, ,residences. The property to the west is designated for multi - family use and iri deva� _gped and with a condom' icua project; J MAiI�li COMIS'Si0Qt RESKUTION No. �! VARIt� 87 -16 -= BON rlalluary 13 i90 u Pale P ' i G (c) the applicatido has beOn SUbMltt {w to increase the height; of an apartment building fv'O *' eke StPry to two stortis within 100, feet of adjoining --single, :f6mii1� resit *6 contilary to the regfll�remenfs of, Se�ctiort" 17.08,640 -0 of the Rancho. u.c 94 DevelOoment Cc4; and (d) The var,al as, specified in the application would contradict the obJectives t�i',;,;�tte Ra=06 Cucamonga Devel0$*nt Cade and approval of the application Jf4ill d adversely effect the health, safety _and w1 fare are a persons living,in a+rf iiWSP1 _e vied{ ty for the f'ol l ow FAA reasons: ; (i) The . Co rtt,v rement limiting rauitIRfarrri'� ` develop,.eiits !to one etorr,�� in height within 10tl fWet of tht. L& Residerrtiaa. Distri;pts is Uten'*ily to provit%.' - dfnsity �Gr�ansiti+�"M area , from 'Me, s011910 iAally Ad the awrcti -fvdly .J (ii) ie ',;ode requirament limiting attached products OJacent to existing 'tine story, single foully &VOOptaants :.to on# ttWyi in height is intended U, provide greater privacy for sfny,a.fa*ily residences and general lant; use ceaatiirili - 3. Owed upon the Substantial evidence presented to this Czasissionl 6 during the above referenced public hearlhg and upon the specific, findings of fags set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above,; thit C is�ion .hereD� finds and concludes as folle (a) That strict or literal lnterpr•et&tiocr_ ' end enfora;eraent of the specified regulation would rangy\ result in .practical difficulty or unnecesssry'! physical hardship inconsliUnt with the objectivr�,��' of t;? Deve opmtrrt Code, �! (b) That them' art ot` a tionai or extraordinary circusstances con hens applicable to the pry WtV ir�v!l�v r� � the fAtended use ,,pf the prom qy Apt 40 not apply generally ttr'­�tther proper?i�4 in titer same district, a (c) That str �f or liter-al— lnterpreeaj ia+� � and enforcement of pecifie `'r ��la a» ' uld rot, deprive the.f pplleant of pr`itlilege4 en o� d by the owners of d#,,or properties in the s#are dish, t'ct. C% r. - (d) 7bat tics granbin of the Variance raid eonst tuts a grant of special privilege inconsistent: with the limitations ort dther properties, CUOMO in the ware district. � Y 41 ice" 1 r WIWI "v -16 - BB1l January J �J $a$ lbat� >, the grantinq of the varian�.'a `wiII detriioptal to the public health, °safety, or welfare; . or materially Injurious to properties or ` improvemer s in. the ,�gicinity. 4. Bas id upon`tht- 41ndirr�o and con,:losiorts set Earth in paragraph I, 2 and 3 above, this Coeetiss #..r± hererby denied the application subject-t--:) each and ever, oanditiibn set forth below; 5. #je Deputy secretary to this Coptissimi snail certify to tie j adoption of t#-,s Resolution. - APPROVED ADOPTED �zIS 1�kH't3AY OF lAibL Y, I988. PLMNING COC USION OF THE CITY OF RANCHtI OCAM,QN6l! BY Larry r e 3 a rrasat • r { t ATTESTS MIL qw Brac(guller, Uepuzy ray juryi,; « ...... ;� f 7, I, Srad, Buller, Deputy `'*- mlwetary, � «P "the plann, Coearissiion of `the City of Rancho Cucamonga' ::do he eby certify that the• fnwega�sng Rena" tion was duly and 4; resquTaErlY Introd6ce4, ..¢o"41 and adopted by ulta Planning Cc� ission'of tits City of Rancho Cuc �9 k at a reqular �eeiing of tha'FTanning ComOssion held � an the 13th, day of J4 ary„ 1g8$� by t�� f ®li�artrtg uate-tes -�#t� S: Ciki�l7�IL 1}ER � - NOES C LSSIMRRS.. ABSENT., Cm1 rssx6 i s: t. t> o �rd 1 e 11 crr of 'r?wmo cucAN CZNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1989 1s7x TO Chivican and Members of the Planning Ce ission FROM: Brad Buller, City PT4nnem1 BY; Debra Meier;, Associate Planer \� SUBUCT. ENVIRONP98NTi ASSESSM;:MT nip, TPUTAINUO "&^T "C"In't- AVAtI ="fit' i4 ,y red I H en E t` "t+WYWc f ccoA r ' ot 8 Its on 69 acres of 'land rlez the di pu es dential eastrict (F-14 dwellifig units per acre), r.�cated on the st side of Hellman Avenue„ $251 north of 19th Street, �,N. 201 - 474 -12� (Continued frm November 2S, 1987) o I. BACKGROUND: This item .loos been continued to various Planning omit ss on,_)r tings beol"ning witt,- fatober 114, 1987 (October 14, November (6Q, November 25, 1987 to January 13, 1988). The Commission has continued to express - Oncerns.-Ytgarding the density of the site, the ability to properly1andscape around the build ngs and the compatibility n7 the structuro bulk with existing single fami RE. TWATIVE TRACT 13679- AYOU{% January 13, 198$ page 2 11. RECONCI 7ION.. VOed upon com Tents of the toast recent 04sign ' 'PIM And the fact that the app's #.ant tseatt prepare a ccwlinai�; t deo bjwnt package: W14aftiq all site plan revisions, k staff wculd reeommod ;continuity this itw -to, allow `ode uaat tint for prspalratiod &ad review'of a revjsed package. ilritten ow verbal constnt from the applicant � t be ",ceded at "a n�+e::irg In order to allot the cttntirnaae« I�rrittera c r3.: tonssent is not received, ertaff woPI4 rec d th this prtki `fit den#ed sand that staff be directed to prepare a Ras ration of, ftniAl. r ( y Res fully s• it ,u l` ; $ ep City P� rnar - s° " 88 :D t:ko #itaGisaents.:: rAsign Review CSSNtiiets of August 6. * . oea#�n Roviw Comwnts of October 22, 1987 ' Design he at C sets of r, 17,E J "7 c arming kIssi''In X63su*,As, of akkc?�iF 14, 1907. Planning COMM 1sion Nil* f Nov r 10, %f F arming Cottarission M #nta4eXof ,,=r, 25„ 1 i-t �`�anning aeta$s #o! Staff Repor"f 0gtobtiA ,. 1987 i� 4 l 0 ENY'ROAMfAf7AL ASSESSNW AND TENTArIVE mil' 13579 L, AMIN A ml;lti� real i theibadi3mr Residential DixLrists (R 8- 14 of land ns enits per, a:re lt+rntedr on the east sit% of Hallman Avenue 325' north of 14th Stra+ t APN: 201- +674 -T2 Desige Panwaters• The PMJ*Ct site presently contains an existing ho(, 9 and detached accessory striotv_" which e�ill � removed. Alit, tw tr"S, ere dotachad 11 to be removed, a 2' dfmotor pine a0d a 2' dipmeter co tr, Both trees being located in ari±t where €�roposad strw would occur. The natural ground slopes` raynoet t to s $t at .aPProxieataly 3.5%. The site is tsw....,:,f -,co this ,u�: th send east b� �r i�ediuwe Iaensi Residential project (the Alta goods townho".$), to t�fa south by single, residences also within the h iuer Density District, &W to the west by single family residences Within the L*V ;i�ansity District. fie applicant is PraPosfng to devel •,��, se units wing the Optional 6ev�elOOMt Standards at an Overall density of 13 units to the acre. Them will be to buildings, Each unit is actually three levels, but the - Ippearance from Hellman Avannre tdlT be that of two Storer buildings;' the eastern Portion of the develoPeent includes an arse for Pool and spa, tot lot, barbecut facilities, and a general open„ space turf area. Staff iroeIMtU: Site Plan 1. Planter antes Orr botz`a 01dts of the proUct -entry should be S'` minimum wide t* provide tl yea and shrubs to •emulate ostreet.�side" ,landscaping. 2. Trio Planter width at the end of the drive ;area at the north ProPerty line sh©uld also be S' einimrae to pnWida Sufficient ante. for planting trees. Architecture ttu The overall vis1a1 faal3 y of the Iown ""dings auld be eManced,,by ° the 1. provide variation fit roof height a ' ridge 9h +� placement. 2. The ,eP4try to Each tOl-*ouSS unit should have some de of individuality incorPOP ting differing Wndok or door �sa or by varying: trim and detail patterns, IT 13970 - � Augm$t 61 Z�. Page 2 3. 'the apo�jcant , is p ire c ittom thin le roofing. ��� it has ban Us polio d1 Planning is�ia� to ra�l'ti�e �s roof A&UvUl to concrete tile. WON amew, Ceeegi Members P- esent: SM0 FAVIck, Brad Buller, Dan Colwan ' Staff Planner: Ombra Beier The Comittee ddtow"' that Vas_ ar�it;ral �q�y prior y�p�'°j'�t r,�ui�reedy.�site j41ar� sand ^ mislon'$ fo W i�Yj# -pl "it�jftq 'm'C Cowssion. /!.'/riot lYS��pribelft n speciffC concerns AdIRlt 4+i k „ I. ?he sip aibsi is vhry ttv lt. It does "t allow sufficiot Perimeter lawsca"d arve a* adequate lard #ng sic" _ ends of the buildings. $Mss alternatives be to in aee aecees to the %"i through the Alt Moods oro '�t or mate a unit. 1 '2. Provide :an apProFrRate lar tpd� scram ai g the tact pfope It" to 46ieve screoniet for the pool area fmm the prvJact adjas "t. 3- n'a ends 4f each building need .additional ai°chitoctural ::regiment. Saeae� suggestions di�sed at the Meting included•. /j A. Ilse of siding aeterials n these alevations. = b. Gradiant CkarW in color frtf cpp+er and lower levels of building. c. Srifting tho b0conie Around the comers of the building. d. Son foF% of stucco triming details. 4. it %Mld also <be desirable to add intee st to the roof line with the in rid- locatlim. *r son, Vertical rdl k� such as bringing the roof lower at the ends of the buildir 5. ThO Planning Cowseission poligyr has been to Upgradre all ref ael,tarial to cOncrete tile. `,r th�I;S particular protect the swMstion was fiat black tit e. C DESIGN REVIEW G6MNTS 6:60 crehra October 22, 1987 E!lYIR"ENTAl. ASSESSilE4ii' AND T&TATIk TRACT 13673 AiollB - A, �rultA- lr� y res3il2q c r nq un on cres of land in the Aiediu►� Residential Distr et (8-14 d"Ilinqq `units,, par aZrel located on tha east side of Nellaaan Avonuee, 326 °ieitt n�)rtj of & th Street APN: 20t- 474.12. 2mba Realer Carnittm NPA*rs Present: Bruce EvNrick� Dan Colesan, 1rad Buller Staff Planner: Debra Meier This prol"t Has reviewed at tha October 14, 1987 Planning cc>rartssion, Meeting, at that hearing the Co+errissilon detererine d that the Present site design did not **at the - design gaols of the oevalopmmt Code cr-`"txe General Plan and contin"4 the hoeing to `Nov#Wer io, 1987 to, allow tiaee. for site design revisions. �� Thee Desig€r.Review Cosfitittee 'gxpresskl the specific conCerCes &9 f ;� 1. Although this project is in \�'W *diuee Res%d ntial District (&14 (�Mlltng units per re) tht dcamittse felt-that this particular site w1l; not tuitabet, duet is size and neighbor ,-,haractcr, fo)' Mxlim density of this Zane.' - - 2. The Ze story building at the StM,tscape is not compAtible to the surrounding single,�farril,y Character 4`01; 110111111" ANC-1-ma. 3. Because *f the *tensity Of the site there is a larg* percents of hsrdscape -and -fit adequate. areas for plhnting of signifarrt sued landscapky ;arials. The Comittee provided directiGfl to the appocant'for: the following recossoended revisions: 1. Delete NO unt- from the building facing Nellaran Avenuet,' In would bier tits density irM 13 duelling units par acre to 11.6 dwelling units par acre. 2. Scale drain the height of the Wilding acing Relletan Avenf�� to a nw'eiram 1% Story height. "lire building design reflect si�reflect a large S1491+t faeily ho". 3. To .often 04 appearance of thet. en>tr r SuVY4stcd using a hedge rather than the Mock Wil (p t _d4f the Patio arha.,, 4. The site dms`ign of the 'H*IIq Q AYerrue *rr °.*,ate should include ! l additional landscaping along the criveway ,aM at the north and sore"i building elevations, along nth t ber%ad„ landscaped streetscape. f A� it C -.5 ` 4� i I DESIOR REVIEW COi4!4I S 840 9.00 Debra Decewrer 17, 2887 ENlit AUES-W11° ND TEftl'ATIVE AvT 18670 A°lM - * ti- ra"�° gig - aeitza� ae�eiopmenw fib' :sE9 c s *f land in the "UK Resident<al District (6-I4 "UPC units r w— i, located 06 tie east side of Mellon Avenue, �2s' r+orter, of I9�StMee� - APFir 201- 474 -12. Newrised plans All be pensmW at a* w4ting, fop discs stf4a. F. Dull! RMOV CONNItteeikt OR: _ HGOMrs Pres*ntr Dan Woman, Drwm Eserick, Peter T61sW Staff Planner: Dabs Were Q) The applicant had provided a revised la a" plan sod miliow revisions for building exterior for review. Archit�.� _ Tie APplicant has proposo *1 ovations using a caabinatim of stucco aqd 000d siding. Thy COMB �� had no di1flulty, W th the estterlals. The issue of greater coax *m Ame -Ins the Cowtibili t, pf the westerly 1 building with exists sing-we �ly ft on ikllsstr Avenue. Previous suggestions included lowering str :L+nv i°a one and see -ta if st , creating tM appearar" of a 'large, � ngle -famil hoer. Add1,j onal suggest ons wOre to infant the end entries to the a de of building, etc. Site Plan The fire CHO has given clearancrt to aliatirAtt t ewtrgenCy aces � route as Iong as Oth banding includo firs ,sprinklers 'This alltxrs additional araa of ties ;its to provide laoywr try typos 4rr+ 411ow more � "teriais along the *i*, of the "starly senility. The Cmaittee wC414 prefer 1-71 at a►�Lh properlyI tka driveway; relocate the sifigle gtMt parking i6pn-,, to allow id la ra" focal point as ore entars the driveway. The Careittee did not have enough inforeation to raCO ;% pF 'ail. They suggestard additional Cowdtt*o mylim oft* the apprrp ate �l��ts wars prepared ante allow the Comittw m analyze the arctri toe toire,. site planning and yands.:aping &s.& whhole, , H. DIME E NS '� :1N0 `@ MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS OE' -' APPKOVAL "'tuk , 4 .: _ -. vision o`r'i'3i ' acres o \&-b In 10 ° , parse s w �h'in"' °liinicrupa Impact �!{e.�vy industrial barea 9),, located on the south side of p`arra�r Route, eastt of ,,Milliken Avenue - APlJ9-1II -3a Barrye Hanson, Sil Engi:ncer, presented the staff nepor} Chaireian McNiel public hearing. Mr. Robert Sandsps sntinq iliiliar and Schmidt, questioned, tht urdergrounding ones, Barrye Hanson, Svil E„ leer, clarified`�thaV he undergrounding of the 660 cns not reques d but the single strand communication wire for thL C6KY' line an be u rgrounded and this is what is being requested to be underirounded. _ Mr. Sandstrom staffed they will not die ree with file added `aidifirations of the conditions for the time ext�nsio Chairman W.Niel closed the public hearing. Col=fssioner Chitiea movoU to approve the \no M the approval . of the applicant *.o include the underg tire` utiliCoami,si. sr Eme rick seconded the motioncarri d by foli i owi egg vote: AYES: CHIT {:Ao EMERICK, 6LAKEStEY, %IE NOES. NONE ' ASSENT: !NON rried ° ;• ENVIRONMEktA t ASSESSMENT AN ENATx4'E TRCT 13Tg AYOUR - S A multi - am y res n - T- ve opmen cr rAs n o v un.� s on .6N acres of land in the Medium �sidenyiial Vistrict (8-14 duelling units pet, acre), located om, the pas t e of Hellman Avenue, SES t feet norti of 19th Street, APIJ 201_4lfas side Oebra Meier, Assaciate Planners presented"� staff report. I Commissioner Chitioa questioned whether cthe perimeter walls match the adjoining developments and if there is a' twivaorative finish on the front porch wa9l She did-not feel Cinder block in the front Baas„ not 11 appropriate, it. should have a matching stucco covet, and a cap and be consistent on the interior within the project, it$Olfi, She stated she is 6 Planning Cou XxJon .Ft #notes r6- October 14, .1991 ra particularly ca- merned. with the (rent ortion with aj decorative finish and feels that stucco would, be most appropriate. Chairman NOW opened the public hewing Mr. Richard Ayoub, owner of the pMoject, staffed 49..is ih# atrement with the staff rtaport: He- agreed with Commissioner Nftiea's, r$.T ndation about putting op cinder b1lock and.s�Cuccafng it. Chairman McNiel closed the publIv hearing. °- Commissioner hlakesley "ex reseed his'' concern about, this unt of hardscape and 41rive between the -two buildings and the sound attenvition. R&, was concerned there is very 'little root for Iandscaping. ; commissioner" Tolst4j stated that some language. °. be 'pat in the requirements so that the wall situation f taker] cawe -,,ors to the > > -- satisfaction of tote city Planner. In his opyrcian, fir., `Tt,6toy stated 6"j dfI not feel it-iwas a very gddd, project as the 0 ' 'fRpbr has tried r overdevelop !.Ps' pf ece of pr. operty. Comissioner Chitiea expressod her concernA- rzg_Ardii�g the nssive amount of hardscape in relation to the landsdi�c 1, 0d' tho balciAies extend rijht over the asphalt and this would oft seem ON ba appealing es the asphalt generates a great deal of beat. iiaissioner F.merick coC*r4ed on toe lack of landscapV - upright to the sky and thet.mxpanaivei orrcreta .w the $duo. He is also . concerned about thO timer nav fir= ictf,%s to the north which meant theiiC) will be no latrdscaping It that amess,._ It will-be open 'f r fire ;truck - access. ice would like, to sea intensityy 01 use drduh Rd a6d the de bga revic f`d ittr r% little more- iand3eaping. Commissioner Chitlea stayed the sit* plan and the lancilvtapfnb; nead5 to be readdrassed but th.# irasic concerns regarding the ar. bitectrral issues bade been met; Nrvd Buller, City Flaaner, " SQMrized the Wor cancer'ns . of the CoM'csidn stailfi the "aunt Of bardscape that abuts the property, especlotily t4 04 eouth acrd , long ft alleyway of tE* dri,vaway t4 the garagasQ ff old work with the appli�artt on increasing"-the width of the ply Hied areas o allot, some more sfgOifi rit landscaping. Comrnissiore° Tobs:oy aged pith Mr. duller and �i� ftawit� that theme Was Just too such project for the propart . Grad, Culler, City planner, stated the n0vth and so ur fnes of the t Yding cicsesb to t!t street as W011 as the Interior, aliemv y our UMS of the jlroj t could be softened through andscapftra ; � gSiisrs b �,tr s "o Cc bet 1$, M7 At� Mr. Richard Ayoub, appli6 nt, indirat:d he would agree' wi��h the continuance of this item. Chaiman McNiel r'eopenel the public heiteing.. Commissioner Emerick aos ed to continue this project to tie Xovembet•,10, 1957, 4 :60 pvm., and in the interim refer it to :Design Review `for fur0ar comment and m4iex. Commissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Hotion carried by the A lowing vote., AYES: C MISS ONERS . EMERICK, TOLSTOY, 1I ESLEY, CHITIEA, KNIEL NOES. COMMISSL)NERS: NONE ` ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. GONE, ied 6s07 P.M. Planning - Commission Recessed 8;21 P.E. -m Planning Commission Reconvened J. EIS ONMENTP. ASSESSMENT AND OF.VELOPW.NT CODE AMEMM 1' 87 42 » CITY An amen n . Development e of e y a anc a ucamonga. Ordinance 811, to revise Section 17.12.040 pertainin io upgrade of parking al6�;azion standards and to'reguire enclosed ga ges for al _1 apartment a4k;,candrmiolom• projects; aii, to revise Se.1 17.05.4 0 pertaining- to upgrade of General Design Guidelines fcr arking areas in multipic f;mlly developments; arid,` to revise Sect n 31 ,08.040 pertaining to upgrade of minimum residential units e� Alan Warren, Asscciate Pla ior, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the pub c hearing.' Mr. Stephen Ford, representative the William Lyon Cc ,)any, addressed the issue of the 1,000 msinimume are footage as proposed in the resolution. The 1,000 square fatiat mti mum is alpplicable to any single j family detached unit regardless of the land uft designation that it woul be constructed in. They have a s ng >oncern ebout the 1,000 square foot minimum in Low-Media or Me categories. Victoria Planned Coxwnity has a number of ;,Angle fa y projects in the Low- Medium and Medium category and a number, of praj s have been built well under, 1,400, square feet. Their best seliin home is 917 square feet. Setting the 1,000 squaM_ foots minimum ialcrNP costs ,6f a Single family detached home that could be on x'3,00square foot lot enough that it would. eliminate the opportunitat tY o€ home ownership which is most d €sirable to tl ~��This * uld Aft be inconsistent with the goals of good bousiif 0 c Planning Commissroi Minutes .$- Cctober 14, 1987 I; DIRECTOR'S REPORTS Q. MINIMUM IT SIZEtMINIMUNI LOT SIZE MAPUT STUDY- Van Coleman, Se or Planner, announced thy: market study would W ` t presented by Mark ith Peat Marwick Main A Co"anyo Brad Buller, City Pla erg, presented the backgr�rn:r leading up to the Market Study. Mr, Mark Smith, nepre,arlti Peat Marwick Win Co., presented a market study analysis it th4 ho Cus�nga housing: market. Mr, Smith - stated t`se purpose of the st and presented a summary document regarmdjnf4 . nifti -Ziat deHe'inpe� defines. Mr. South ;urthar staffed incaas {nt; 4hr mi,�imur$ unit. size fo, �Ingle- andlti "- faartly housing wi %l also increase housing costs and p �aibit artion# hcubuyers and renters from obtaining needed housing. The Comrission received the report and coati 4,d their review fo tills item to the November 25, 1987, =eting, Rrai3 IC IC EARINGS ! E.. Ek"r4IRONMEiii'AL ASSESSMENT AND IV_U ATlbl: TRACT 13579 - AY0JB- -, A multi-famfly rest. n a erre u nc compr s ng,or,rV u,c s ;sin .fs9 acres of land in the I2divar Residential District (8 -14 0011ing units per acre), located an the east"side of Heolean Avenue;, 325' north of 19th Streg� - APH 201- 4ir,.12. (Continued from October 14, 19871. Commissioner Tolstoyr moves[ to.. continue to the Bove her 25„ 1987 meeting at 4;00 p.m. by request from t'ho applicant, Comissioner Blakesley � seconded the motion, Motion carried by the following Vote, r w. AYES: CGMMISSION.S« 'TOLSTOY, BLAnESLEY, CHXTIEA. EMERICit { NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MORE ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS; KN1EL -- carried B. ENYIRON,MENTAr ; SMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13727 - JANSSENS - A rsiaeniiaal'sub' 10 -4o'f I'? single as y lots on Rr�es o land in the Low Rest tt�l Distrtij(2 -4 dwelling 'snits er acre; located at the souther of Carnelian Street Highland corner a. Avenue - APN 201- 214-11. � antinu�d from October 14, 1987.) Commissioner Emerick moved to cdt , a to the December' 9, -tgg7 meeting by request from the applicant.. C s$ioner lllakesloy seconded the motioT. Motion carriers by the folloWng te, o , 1AA FT F'0 7"S..':lI.�c;d..x�.t 7 Corporati for th* purpose of providing a Senior Housing - Project per thhe� uirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Sectidh 17. 00 of the Development Code, Ore-lnance 211) for 1701, apartuont uni;*y,ta by located on the south side of? Base Line Road, west of Art i�'.�-g venue APH: 218 -031- 10,19. (Continiled from October tai, �98�; } Commissioner Olakesley mov � OAUnue I % to 7e Decimberil9r 1987 meeting 41t request of the a Sant. Commis ;,�sner Chitiea secolded �he motion. ttiat was carried b ` following vute: I! AYES: COMSSIONFRS: `11AWESt, CHITIEA, MRICK, MCNIEL I NOES: COMISSIONERS: N it ABSENT: COMISSIONEPS: TOLSTOY ` * * * carried H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS IM TENTATIVE TRACT 13x79 AY'OUB - A �u1i �aae"'Ty ras en , awe open corayr 1199 oic ° 'unnRs on _ ��i9 .�) acres of land fit the Radius Residential District (8-.14 dioellin units per acre), 1a,;ated on the,vast side of Hellman Ar,=e, 32b�1. north of 19i:h Street - APH: 201- 47e -IZ. (Continued from Naiembe,�` 10, 1118`7.) , Debra Meerer, Associate Planner, pr*Kented the staff report. chairman McNiel opened the rublic hearing. Mr. :Peter, Lynch, 1973 Ariva Drive,, Monterey Pork, representingfi4e applicant, stated they are - trying to work, out the details re0 endations of the Design Revie4 Coiftitteo. The appl,icaiit arid' consultfAnts -,are working under the directiO.A f the Planning Comissi$n°s. objectives fAlowing the �tober 14, 19,8 R3anning Commission jv..•eting Mr. Frank Firestone Ake, 12001 Wilshire Blvd, Santa Monica, consulta ,t for the applicant, addreJksad several`'of the reco�endotions of ty� I Planning COamissien re(trding treatment of density;, iandscari1g, ttie design of the bu.il ding, ((atxi ha[rdseaping. i Chairman lkNiel recoraeen+ '4ed fh`t the applicant 9n back through Design I Review process with this project j Mr. Lynch stated they have appr cbed this project in a positive way to resolve the conflicts and mitiaate the,Planning Commission's concerns. 1 In response to Chairman McNiel!S ques:.ign'Jof how soon V* applicant would b* prepared to go; through th;rj0esign Review process,­ 14r. Ake stdte,� V4 applicant woold� like to go through as soon as possible. a �,; Planning C00issidn i'eeting `• Nutember 25 1987 ORA c FOR DISCdU ,9S(^N 1,*ai?rsr1r%C1w n tt Y . Q issioner Chitiea moved to refer thfs tV;ect to the Deslgn Review Committee, Commissioner lemerick seconded the lotion. Motion carried by the following Foote: , It AYES: COMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERXK, BLAKE5LEY, MCMI,',C NOES: COMNISSIONCRS: Now-,,: COMMISSIONERS,. TOLSTOY Commissioner Lverick moved to continue tear -N to Vhe January 13,, 1988 meeting, Commissioner Chitiea seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES; COMMISSIONER$ RICK. CHITIcA, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS -ft3NE ABSEN -T: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY * * * * -- carried N. NV1NCOlr� VbA ASSK"SSM ENT AND Cf_' i?IQNAL USE PERNIT 83 -05 -CKOSa 8 � u . a , square ray€ s� ui mg and a ,�,3fifq square foot "afffce and ciasva°ooaM boil ng and operate an extended day nurser, and. preshrool. on 5 acres land r,n the Very Low- ReSA,dential District '(less than 2 dwellina -Ai ts per acre) of the Etia�ndi Specific Phan, located at 8323 Eti►va. as Avenue APN: 227- 051 -533., Debra tRet.: , Assoc;' Plaarner, presented the'taff report. Commissioner Chitiea q stioned why the wood shingle roofing is allowed. Debra Meier, Associate Nnner stated. that In Design ,Review wood shingle roofing is �ecieferrr"�d to, in the Eti ndo Specific-) Plan, iiith that in�ain Review agreed to the wood shingle roofing in this pro!ect. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, clarii d that wood shingle roofing is one: of the materials encouraged by the tiwanda Specific Plata in keeping with the rustic, rural chararmgristics f EtiWafW 1..,, Chairman NeR el opened the public hearing\app William Runyan,_ designer, stated the apponcurs tA th most ` the conditions of the staff report. Thant did que�±3on t m possibility of the cul -do -sae and after _m wle neighbors of this project, they would not be supportive of curd_ -s ing off the street at this time. The applicani, YF ®poses to construrtsonry block wall on tfze praperr.�+ line (roar cornea to cnrner' on the east a nor. ` Planning Commission Meetin3 - 10 - Navemher 25, 194 r`--- —`-- -- ` d rIT OF JUNCHO CUCAMONGA CUCAA10 1, STAFF REPORT 0 O Z DATE: October 14, l,I�RB7 1477 TO: / tt chatru" anl!rl ers of the Planning Comei�.ision. FROM: Srad Bu'tler',' Cii,)! Planner K: Elebra Neior,.Associate Planner SUL'UECT: �1lVIRONMENTA -ASSES riT AND TENTATIVE tRAGT 1357b - AYMB a v resIddnPai otyelopeont coepr s ng . unit's on M69 acres of land in the N,*diux Residential District (3-14 dwelling units per acre) located on Ou' eazt tide of Hel lmm Avenue,' 326 feet nod p of 19th Street - 0;14a 2111- 474 -1t. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action ern Requested: Approval of 'the- subdivis on, asap, conceptual plot plan,, conc+r,Ptual grading plan, conceptual laftdscape plan, and b!jilrling elevations for �,thc development, 0 9 townhouse units, and issuance oe a Negative Declaeation. ff � B. , Project Den_ siityr_ 13.0 Mliing- units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning-. ROM stl `1aWN , s; thus Residential (8-14 dwelti�y :, 4 snits per acre South - Existing Single Fasily Residences; Kedi'um Residential l (8-14 dwelling units pur acre) Ea!,t d Existing "ownhoees; Medium Residential (8-14 duelling units per acre) kit - Existing Single Family Residences; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units acre) D. General Plan Designations: lF�oyec 51- e - um es dential ( 8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - ;tedium Residential (8✓14 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium: Residential (8-24 dwelling unito per acre) East; - Idedivas.Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) f West - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Site Characteristics; lose site slopes fry north to south�at ( approx ma e y a percent grade. The parcel contains an i %1,51 *4 single family residence and accessary structures which will b# removed. °Also,, two trees will be removed, a 24 inch diameterredxr and a 24 inch diameter pine-. Sc. Cp *eaning for the pool area frt the Alta Hood Elect > ': adjscent. 1' � li � j1 .r�9• PLANNING CONE MIL iiAEF REPORT 7SNt x ;'r. t 135/9 - AYOUB Cctolsar 14, 4987 (� . ;t Pago ; P.. park ingCalcul,ifiions� . P (J.� ka'xbt of Number ' ',PT ?Y'H . 9 three- bedroo`n units . (2.0 a 9) :18 18 enclosed - (0.25 x r r91 3 11. AI:ALYSIS: A. Gene " -;l The townhouses are designed in three levels, two Mr" ess of living spaca over.;ai� .car ga"rage.. The units area . provided mithin two buildings.-) Private open wca for each unit consists of otrance ±patio , and twd a arj Thal tmi¢s, 'On- 'Site amnitins are clu%Urid to the rear portion of the site, including Pool, spa, suit dodo, tot lot and opeirplay area _. S. Resign- Review WWttaez 'Mik project w ■ prestflt" to the � gn ev ew o tie :brick, Buller', Cohan% o on Agra sc , 1987- The Committee deterer1004 :that varidUS architectural and site plan ` were: : :> 1.1 Commi"'s : The, site design is-- very tight ' a d does not allow sgfficien$ perimeter landscaped area or 'adequate landscaping along the ends of the buildings,, Some si er ra #i9rex many, be to gai Unit. R Appliewt's Rasp=": 'the applicant did t6' to gain Weraincy access to the north onto the Alta *Aods tOwnh'ft P"J'Ct.r The Homeowner's Associat #orr .for the Project denied his request. Rather than delete a tinit, the applicant is tOncentrating on all the specific problems rela##ed to the, dons"n of the site as _described in item 2 and 3. The applicant ad&-d two E E Maple trees to each end cf the building adjacent to " "1 Raper However, the planter depth 3s too swill for trees and a tall growing shrub;; SUCN as Kldocarpus is 2. Corareittee a CWOM Provide an approkiriate, laodscape screen along the east property line: to achieve; rxvate, PCA4i M C (W( 7AFF REPORT TENTATIVE AYOi3B- October 14!_ I9�F -. Page : �e i APpli"Ws Respmse: The Tatdscape area along the � north � and- Est of = tite spool and. dect area noW contains a coin mucus serer► of trees. on * 16 fool:' r. `"centers„ The trees Proposed aye mplo. staff suggests using 4 species rare 'sdaptsltie to wr ,Liquid mbar or 'Sycaaore wmild provide °a sioilar , appear nce and are betteo Suited for drwght tolerance. 3. Committee,& C oc+aa°�:: The sendsl "'of each building, -need - additional arr$1tftturtl tr t. Spy sulpiilos discussed et the Ming if h W a. Use of siding nateritils on "age elevations. . b. Gradient cha€tfle in a:olor from uppetr and ?over levels of building. C. Bringing the balcoro� around the the building, d. Some form of stucco trtming dataiis. Applicant's Responon The applicant has provided veKtcal wood siding with a horizontal k x ,IQ trio >: piece at each floor level. TM .siding is painted. carr3r,4ng oux thO blt"reY color: range of the dasired Cape -Cod them of the project. -" 4. Committee's Cowww: It would also be desirable. to add interest to the roof lime with than ir% rfdge" , -; location= or so* vertical relief such as bringing <�ne roof lower at the ends of the buildings,; 1piic&Ws NOSPM01 lid W line of the` end units ; has been dropped 12 ilrAts helot# the aiddle portion of the building, f 5. C tue'z 4"cem.: The Planning Ceaitrrissioo_ polity has been to upgrade all roof material to concrete We. for this particular project jje suggestion was slate colored- 11r:at tile. APPIlCut's t 3WWWV ftvcf Material proposed is now concrete tile. t; C. Technical, Review CONNittee: The Comittee rsviewet the "' ° an .,� e n a die recorended sea nda►s�d cD:+i0'' tons of approval and tpeciAl ,cnndjt1grs as provided in the attached Resolution, the project is consistent with all 1.9plicable standards and'Ordinances. PLAMNIK Cmissit IAFF REPORT Tai ATIVE TRACT !W9 AYOUB - fGt4bsr 14, ho 4 Rfi�ri�41 _Ass0aw Af.- part I of tht Init4i Study hos beau �Zt04'� c att . , Staff has coePj'*t* ' Part II of the rRVTfvmwt41 Checklist and found no signifiCttnt" estvirot�ttnt �� � rasult� =?�i� ���eC�� M. r "�CiS FI3Ii.rw- the pt,i44t `I:, con>aistt ait# the tt1xtt;:tut . a �,. r: r . Plan, an Dili Oat be 40triattntal to adjacen+; pro traits, . ttr Cali matt iag►a�ci,SK die AMY ttit�isaad usa, ; br+mirtg # and si vision, tc+gtzhat, nth a3 1 caa �r contitionS or, a in c i4anco W� gpiiesb a regulatS of R*rtlapeett Cam. W. S CE: This has b ati"rtised As public'otrarit4 , n a „ aietr+sttt* pro"ny aoti p r a, lCX�l StR rs WfUl tof e :ths p eat site. N. R Staff r*06000aftft that tho "Flan og :oi t sssian i1 apPr tre eve IWCVt i g: sttb�etct to -the-- 4" of appreva3l th:�ttt atEopationa attach Ratsoiitaa i>Rti issu ---� i� _ of a Negetive Deciarittitrn. Res I.V s it.,x; Citsc a`Rner Attachnnts: Exhfbft - . 1.tiC'ztiaR F atp ENV it :01, _ ,5i to Fl arlll t amoval Plan � Exi�itxit V1 -' iravc. ,val Fat"git� Eaitit'ii 'iii"' ictic4� _ �5l taAndicsit Pion Exh#Oit 014 P,-3- li6 Py Oradfs ,,last �l F.xhii. v - V. ra .par nt C utatiaat , Wink 4' - 101ding Elevations Exhibit `H* - Ruor Pit" Resolution of .kpprova'i with ronditlont r� � o ij WCHLAno Xgvv . . R� t 500 PROJECT � lu c B`1insTSe nTN ' Rid r , N %I H R7,NCIL C-Q A'1%110NGA TITLS- i J Y Ili •q »C =p` Nd ;*OUT BOO '+re" � aoQ 1CV N�oytR ti i:S TK Wt 1 Fu -.. i ■4"wr Ora .. ......rrGU..r SITE PLAN tCT'YI' M�RMi ^J'4 --w ar•�a.,. -a.xu. ���" .c.. ,;- .r.s�te ..,,e�.to�ewwn �a�+ro �o+cn I, .attitf a.,aa7 sat 4Oa ,: -'a ; ,� a;,x,Y - aau.a.s3 w ev. Ya i•. •3 x.srr.a w+r Boa cw t.(}lrNp� l�i�XY GRIM 41 A a,..si2o+*:rxx.Caacv.ww}* "� zY A! :'}f ?OQ - irasa�a:rs,y��t on 'o't`W iL•}D :# .]:F CY AWlWi1 tlli 9'.">o4v r ,llti " RANCM - r ( a M , �.. tit T -i ,.:,.. Removal Permit Cucamonga C) GENERAL INFORMATION OR MORE THAN 6 TREES ORSO 'LiNEAR FEET FW{NURLtV Ut Ordinance No. 1.76, pertaining to U1;4 preservation of trees on privatc property, requires that no person ° ret move or relocate amy woody plants in excess of fifteen (16) feet in height and Having a single trunk circumteronre of fifteen (!§)Anches or more and mul(krunks haviffy a circumfer$( ce of th4ty (31) ircnes or more (measureiYj(46ntyfour (24) Inches from ground level), without first otit0n3rig a Tree .� the Remov qty. Removal itfrom me Z �....�........ � TO OE COMpLETED 8Y AIaPii "CAt+IT; i f LOCATION OFSUBJECTSITE. 6644 Heilman live. NAME. ADDRESS,TELSPHONEOFAPPLiCANTt Rtchard Avoub. 6644 Hellman ,Ave Alta Loma .CA 17x1701 (714) 450 -1220 !' LLJ NAME, ADDRESS, TEt ?t'.vNE OF PROPERTY OWNER (1101herthaa appiicAnt): , SANE RE, 45QNSFCRf�C MOVAL(attachnecess?t,yshe- tsI Trees are fur the Proposed ? YAcation vf. build_ inA ids. (SEE TENTA1x3i 1RAt,T MAC') nROPOSED METHOD OF MMOV AL• Trim fra Ito- £gh� t then doziir APPLICANT'$ ADDITIONAL FILING REQUIUMENTS l This application shall include a plot plan indicating !ocatfon of all trees to be removed and retained. ` The species, number, and size of the trees to be r9mvied shall be so dc�qlgnated, if a tree is tfi3eased, then a written statement from a licensed arborist stating the natxire oC the disease shell he recurred. ACTION -- avaluatfarrof this appftaatfaa 11 bear l arts thil crilerirf an the f*VOrsa alda: Fr'- APPROVED 0 DENIED ! Cat�M, Nelifieation of application shall be given to p ]' prior to aPproval. If no appeal"f47ecelved, tf date of ac3io This approved tree removal parr � Y or boding pe'rMit .ssutince, whichever z;omes ` lay period, a nQ4 pzrrnn shall be rsrlui'6d, un _ expeatio:'s of th4 pe!mit, 000. EXHWrt 4 rr +.w�.�..�•.r�w�.r..M.rrrww..u. - �.l�i^ k- ^r++.+�s+�. --­7 7 4�4 rf�a �. ...,arrrsf 4rMS frwrtdt rrwrsaMf w. a+nwe �. .wws.0 se wrr.z. i ae, rw:.+w. any emw as nnwo r rR71./. ffri. liR. Y:11R0. -Yi7. �fP�lf ��. rCdJ a... i}iPfirlpMr� w� f..w...-rasrarr� S.'C;.'.aFi•wu�S�.,ao� .r. � � �. afsrwerw am, s+fasfanw ar�fw.GRGa '�• aw. Y:itlf1lLMMr ems. rrw. ,'+ . Yg ,Kw P119% r w�. af.lai�4rr. . r2rreinrsaa rM�r... _ - -mmkv ii *yW to, + cnyOF JA TMI PIANNW MVE . .r1 _ a t �.. 7 �. t t -- �•.- ,wo'..'"� � � it ! # .�• a. ' ~ `�� FJ 111 ...� J/��. yy�� pp��j�ryry pp pp�� � � .?� air y.a,zG .w••Yw:4 AGr la atC ^\tt'�MCGI. R& MM 7 �ki1� IT ",1st ✓ 1y — SCAM • t i 1 "�I� r. CF ��Nwll MOM a r. CF ��Nwll MOM � w y Vzo iI 0ARAGE ENTRY BUVA BtMDtStCi SECTION - A' r1 - �wwr 014T ENTRY S2.EVATiON 1 C , aa.i.Y:.d1'i SOM ELEVATIONS t n th aftwatims rciidlar t JJME i. ?' T�,1f 1 �_ a XNCHO .C.QGC i �' `i C1W OF RANCSO Cdr "�iyi0Ndl I MATE, ` Januoav 13a ,1588 t. W T0: Chair rid.hers of 6e ,�larsning &; vsfi si a3 FROM. £brad �)u�� Pity Plannell t BY. Scott *4r Ph I plr Aoocfate'P'tanner SUBJECT: ENVIR ►Nib L ° �lSSESSiEtiT AND °TEIRTI T1 TR.CY M389 l t� cus as o sa v on o•,. .7a #"ras o ° G an parcels A the very bow, Density �� �sidential Distrikclt-�tleis,than-2 dwelIJ69 units,�per achy ' Iocatind o� , vhe.eatit sib "df Sap�hipe,�t t, xouth of N)1)side Rand > APNs 11062 -4 1 -D, 10 and 13 Montinued f 196a) i( Related file. Variance 01-15 �r F {{ PiNIR I NTAL ASSMMENT AND VARIANCE 87 -16 1AALTOM •� A request o ,r a ire m n ft av Wa e -lots X ; r ,�Spii s squarer feet in area to 21,392 sjUplm feet 1n ar�-A jm conjuriction with a six 6Y1ot. s� 'd�risio� io�aa�ed,pr��'�e . epst aide of �taphire Street, south, of `Hit)'ide Road - to4 2Q61451 -I0 and- 11. (ContInued front; ecemkr 9, 1987) Relati�d Pile: Tentative Tract 13365. On 0%erf &r 9, 1907; the pYanning Comaeission received a letter fnorn� the uppl icanti xequestim; q th4t the .ahove�refe+ ced items i �r ontinuec to' allow 'a more thoy"000h analysis' of 7' 4� th �,'ainage true. A. revised { r, drainage report was wt:eived on Janu+try ,41988 Wressiog ,e drainag Of the tract dpwn TerY StreM- ' Stiff, 116w yer, does not, aay ; sufficient tip tR ade�ctstelyr re t+ :t. P'etiised diatnage repd�, piJor, tO the , Planning Ccasm � jiare e«1? �a�. ere;�or „, staff r6comwos I than* " :I e, Tentative Traci-map anw Variance be continued to the Jano 'ry 27, f.m3a Planning. C ission meeting. Co4ent of tote applIcon , Is mecewry. to " Continue the itm. Res p `ully'�su' itt d, t 8 er lI Cft1rnraa" I u i ; TTEMS r C) i Atta Scott Dear SIr: c G; pettaining.,to TT #ij359 ors ��zda � ��� e taxi a 41 u�t4 would liko !9,16Ixtend -thik Gs_e � +�fO�ux.��.._��`y Q, tract map ki c�{4+4 tul� �Ct Lsi# next vrf4iQ:`.§ _ \ A ►k '/� ^� Thmk YOU, 4:�M:�y ry.�iirqii`x' {✓ � PL�NIR'3 L7t�f:S;rlTi ry h t9.a' --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G�S�Ma, o stYs _ t. DATE�7anuary 13, 18 0 c_ ts7�' 7� -1' Tat: Chairman and Members of the P1ann,- Comeission FR04: Brad Buller, City Planner f 4, BY: Bruce Cook, Assalaiate planner SUBJECT: ENYIRSsl6R:NTAL ASSESSMENT �A 6EilERAL PLAN AMFADMENT 87,048 —an Se request-0 ,cYraNR wenera aa11 gyp "mss - "Low - Medium Residential, (4-8 dw:11; ng - u0ft per aC64 Nigh Residential (24-30 dwelling units w per acre) for S.i acres of `bind, located on the south side of Base. Line Road, wcat, of Archibald °- 'APN,' E08 -O31- IB, 19. (Contia:uetii`froae Decearber Sr, 187) ENYIRQW4gRTAL ASSESSMENT_ AW DEY@ OPMENT DISTRICT _ s1? c es o doer e r eve opmen , ls>r c s asap rclw ,.ow -Med3 Residential (4.s dwelling units -par acre} to` Nfigh kesidetttiAl (24-30 dscelTiriB units ,per acre) attachsxi with rthe Senior Housing Aft Overlay District (Sitt)D to tie base di;strict far 5.05 acres of land, located on the south side of Base,Line`:. ibad, west o€ Archibald - APN: 2W 031 -18, 19. (Continued from December 9,`1987) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A. GENERAL FLAN AMENDiSENT 87 -0�i{ a e io mw Te�enc ofi tine Bcne,X Plan from �&ow- Medium Residen ial (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office for 1.69 acres_af land, located on the west.,side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road APK: 208- 031 -I,7, 54, 55, 56 and, 57. (Continued from December 9, 1987) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT lk — , - mques o amend eve opmen s r e s a rop ow.44edium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per, acre). to Office Prof ssional €orr 1.59 acres of 1sad, located on the vast side of ArchibaldL Avenue, south of Base Line Road - APN; 208 - 031 -17, 54, 55, a6 endd 57. (Continued frowa,December % 1987) n DEVELOPMENT AGREEMEW a7 -M TAG DEVELOPMENT - A eve opmen reemen en e y anc o ucamonga and TAG Development Corporation for the purpote " Of providing a ,Senior Housing Proiect. per tne_ quirements of the Senior i(ausing overlay District. fi coon 17,20.04O of the Devploament Code, Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment units,to be located on'the, south side of Base Line Road: west of Archib&14, Avenue '- A.pH :7 20S-031 -18 and 19. (Continued from Dek, r 9, 198Y) �„ LT�P4S O.i2.I 6i647f,"rf F.RECV15, 1. gE 7AC DSO _ atrY 13, 39$1 f 1' .. 4[ Ask Iw SACKSRaI z >8evdlopment has su 1opment package: nC C r, 9MI Plan: A�end*nts* ctevelO"". DU tend ts, ' sign evir4# a lievel0 ant Agre nt ` to ,. Vejop a senior housing ,proett and adja*'f r%edical offiCe bull ir►g in the Vlcfnity Of the SOUtNut corner !�f We Line 9#a�` And Ar4hibald ' Avenue �e varioas A endments� and 00VdtdpmenY, _agreement were continbi -a� f� the planning Cpaetission ateetf,t of , :; r> t 19871 ° at time. l `A' � ..`cite iksi� �'tE�vi�ts were xti'i`i yet reacEv to t schedule' f Planning Ccarrtssio�i 'loo. .lhe C . issio" indicated that Otey nteu to iew the . +otal rr ect >a€t single ,time with ail tre ind#vidual 41 iikiuded. 1 "Wtz Thei4fo , t{; Commission' ConVinued too Fmj Ct to !"t the opportunity to resolve `IN- outataadi ng. 9 sifues. we :. ,, as of t"S dote, the apo Kant Stilt, , has not resolvooT the raining drainage issues per -the,::fir tiers C Me Engineering, Division. ; As a result, the aetign goviews `Itt'e Still not yet ready for P144100g Cools— "SA Sn review. Alsa plep slt Ao,* the t.00y,,of the &tt&, letter of Dere"bAr; j, ,h 1987 front d i'AC l3"07cwa mt ,�ttfor*%4 the City that they have withdrawn as applicants for the pr0ovt anChave assigned all rights dngi Tberefore,i{bkeSt inter *as , in the ' \Pry Est End 1nVeJ#at :�tsp End vest rrts wiil� hen projector ap�Ei nt„f `.> _ d%w RCCd 3€ 3lkTItl,Y# - S +Wf recommkods that the P?aboirg C issien r, non nueI=of the titled fteN A$ referenced `Tn the "beg ,.iFtin of this repdrt to the;► Meting of Fobruary fQ, 2588w U E ResP `uliy su ttt rad e ;iffy P XEnCr $S: nikti Attachments, `�#tar, of oec trr 21, 1987 from TAC DevehPutnc ,� L4tter of Dec eAd Ober 23, ?9&�/ from vest V,d laves otu Ell T A C DEVELOPMENT `t 9513 Business Center Dro,'Ste, f$;' l• ti \\ -1714) 949-1725 n Decens6,,' 22 1987 Mr. Bruce Cook* City of Rancho Cuaainonga 0. Box 807 ho :tartianr k Cep 130 r Dear Kr ('%Cooke: )' : lr This let- er ImPto advise you that TAC iasvelop"nt has a�slgned'� '`�Ights and at and;, Interest to the.r,teniors /Xed! "] Project located t, t 11�t Base" o mnd� �chaosld to West�'End invent esnts thl:t.'assionment. f rightss d ruttiest Includes ail, apollcaticns relative to he y. r+tras, r��Amndment,,H rW And Develbprmnt Design Amsn4ftwnt 4,7• -05. " 5 i nctre %eFry"GEaristensen President � 9 ' a r. WESTENID IINVESTMENT _ U - e7��tM4 �1+..i:�;1:1,'E�� .«r� iiViv. +..'��F•�,grQ �t''•Zv'y'F�i _ - - r. l G a ir+; : .: .`• -mow: `S. Decem,T,er 23, 1987 I. Mr. Bruce Cooke City of Ranahb Cucamonga P. o. pox ate? Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RSx �'' Seni Pr'sdi.�6.. +grje�*b I�as+e'13nse � Archi�ld � Dear Cooke.- , Due to the 4noomplst on of the d asinage- situdy as regApstQd by the Engineering D4part+mentr ws respactfully raquert the Planning CowAssi onv s zeview sghsdu�,ed for I ;*y 13, 1988 be continu$d .a• to , kvebru 1988. Tkilsa - cGgtinuance vi.11 also us an ,,A ortunity "to finish >) r' negotiations of, the bevelopten% Agreemiiit-.so that u complete :Package may be submitted for toZti.ew. ' 3ian:c you for your cons derat�,on of this r �t 8ineerely, eer7s, button Project Manager- ` HDD ks a� -- CITY OF RANCHO C6 AXONGi r STAFF REPORT . s �1 DAriE ' 4silivary 13, 1 8 TO: Chairman and Ff*p ers of the "Planning Cowdssion FROM: BaMe R. Ranson, Senior Civil Engineer South - Residential U ` East - ResidentiaT _ =' West - Residential` ITFM \i it o J BY; Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: EFIYFRONFJit. aSSSES` llElti AM TEFiiATIYE PA„. MAP 11105 k as on s va � s on o re rri"a into z Parcels e, Victoria Planned ComKint }+ located at tha southeast corner'of MAY" Wq and Woodruff Place - APR., 227- 011 -06,07 1J� 1 Y 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION'. - A. Action Requested., ApRro �l ofi�A4 loosed Tent ive Parcel -own "txhibit 'S' ai� O as xFo bn ±} S. Parcel Size: F Parcel 1 - 6.5 AG _ Parcel 2 - 7,52 AC { C. Existing zoninga.- r E Parcel,I - Residential f Parcel 2. - Residential D. Surrou ding taadd U_c worth - Rdsioeitial (Under cans :uctionr i South Rcai1 - ential (under. conSgruction) East - Residential iender lz►k�uction) liest - Vacant E. Surrounding General PlLn and 'Develo€! nt Code De�ignaticns: North Residential South - Residential U ` East - ResidentiaT _ =' West - Residential` ITFM \i it o J M iS WN SUIT ROM Pr P p t13CS January 13, 088 f page F. St Charitctnrfsti`sI .i This si-O is vacant and slopem(appmOmately Wto_ the scuth« - wh rise of phis ;ParcoT map "s,to 04ato two separate arcet.;, par r Pao site if.trf on+s� for° f &ictor�ia a ure schooi . sits, i'n the 'Vine yar -k rit?xth ft" 1nity F The -Comotfty $wrvices 06v DOW ms '"evj�rlied the pir'oposed Parcel Nap and found the-61i actepuble per <' tE Victoria Planned Cr�n(aity. �'arCel 2, tfr� uric Site is present. c exign rMsiie future bras �ns -the school site, nc> 3 ►edi _ t'tr,veloparep' , III, "!EMIrI )tMMIAR."EVIEbia The.apfliCant con aietaed P in °Y tier' ty a Initial ``�a`ir u cfid �fiatd investigation Cpl Ct>WIQ° pert II of 1W- Initial Stutz# :r#o\'' dversa irapactta tire. >e#rviroserent are anticipates a x6sult o "it project. That tforo, isstw,7te of Negative Dowlaration,, $ app riate. IV. CORRSPIIDEMCv'--�, Notions o\` Publ,tC,xlearf Lin peat to Burr w 'di`nrg ' -;1�6perty arrtrerJ and pfatCe i ct 'er Scarily k*port NevsF4pet. posting at the site hai also inn,,compl ttta< e V REC4"WATIGN: -It —fs recomendea + __ p � nis�g C4m'istton consider- - a �e � tfij " el pp�t of i 6ua4 0A?Arc*1 step. If - after such ,consickerai ion, the :�cawi t:n Can:•$ approval then the adoption of the attached: \\, i -tion and lisuance of a 1 i fgative 'BeCiaration orwld,.be apprcpl fete. RespectfOly �ssuLpittod, Yarry1 i{ansoa f. Senior Civil EAtjllnesr .Y SRHI.JSIJh _ 1 Attachftntst Vicfnj#, y t9a t rihi i *Jt`l '-Tent0 ve Kip (Exhibit 08 ") , Resolut ,'on ind. � Recoarend+ed Condo "� ; of Approval ;: - j ara u CL n `• 0 W,i '. a� �5 }. rY!t .�.f•+t 1� � sue+ /v� y: ``v.'+,i.•t" t� t ` ^* ! 'rte ��, f t,: f fh!''�i df�y �s t1 yy�tt, F7r I e ^r�q �^x �� • _5 ker `•.1 � biij`�a�, {r!q q r;e rEi}( .�,5� �(fi} � � ,''�r`f� J�,-. �..; 3 ..T �i' f (({ 1 Af� i[ !i._, 19 - it � t..'^} f JJ t F ( 4 f y % :Ri All p yt"'l.� r ij;i4 {tilt 4�Itr: . � �� iJCj( /� 7 � i,ti S7 � }!�!{ r` �a•i `a`y,¢ 1p�a� 4 -4� �? . :�tt S� �"' E` In FClr r d - ay \.' Sy t`,v ` \' , �hr^•t #r "C•,. t � " �'� ?!fr', ='i�llt}�t`ttivv �,.`,a, �� as�vt\ ��, hi;•I� >��i - •� � { { r � tiv ar v ..- r � •=r �fwr1' t �^, ' -}�Y'' \ a6' u.L'F•t- `� .i '^' •A`4 +�� tj � I"' \> t . �.a a t`' _ xJ ,r .a P °y+''♦�'�i Q ; '��Lal 1,'Fk �� w f'}jf IN ,• Ate( }` � Y ✓�I.it { °�i } ' "��+���A�� � 'Y 1f ��`�!P �x d � 1. t,"qi�. � `'�'9�".� -' �.`-k .y,v -e 'L•�7' �"' ♦ [^ '�'C � �� {�ra��� (! C i} ttii � �� �- ,e��o.- .:,,w,_ �lc�Y:. • �,,.= � LSD- •`�`J�l I A _ PcSFilop +ION O `18dE PLA MIW COMISSi4til+t 4 THE an, ACFN C0CAi � ',_ i,�--M ,z DITIOPA LY JPPtVIM TENTATWE PARM'*' Wdk.11105 1&�EfdE T t + parcef kip 'Nx rJ1106 &Vbvitta'd,by Vitif4W 146W_ rca ar , a pi is i t! Pur oxe sebdi l iia►g ita tw pv e,%, 0.0 n -ial ;�raat�r-�+`s'it'ur�te�" Yti th'�i�r of iianc�a �Gvra flaunts stf Sr":r',�ert wdis�; ' �ti` ' S+�a a� a�i crstt�ta ft t ti iad a�% l nisi 0 >7. X07, e°�,tadk -40 the � sa3utheast �or�r �� 1la�r�ti #� <� and &�dt"Gtfi�PfiB��er ��d � - � ►*4r ,TIM a OuTy adVertised rpnislic t�earing r'or t abovd4daxcribed asap. y lE: Tk i� �sr. i CUC ifiSA�r+LAt��di MAISSION RE%LVr A5 „ FO( ��.il1'i:. SECTION 1s ToAt tl .. ol'lowitiq: i'ifid'iro have beepi 4c0� � 1, Vii \ _mi s,,consisttnt wttk,,tr4 Gem; rai Plaiv, _ 2. That" � k 'im rcWw at of; tire, pr p eabdiY� inn is cossa�tnt - 3. That . the site is p�s��t s :ii AM� tl � for the \� fl'rspti�� dfv s, That the propos*d , ,ubdi4isvf*n j rd %0-0ov cents iii`' _ 6dt cause sD+snti�� anyironntara� public hea th�`p jr ',rnveradvsrse affects �r 3ttin proper t,y. �.- 1� SE IP� This 9*,Owission fields. amd cartiffs r that protect hat Seen ravieaed'' and i,vtNered $n - cnopl i �� � irit� 47ifor�nia Environeantsl Naliiy Act f 14101 ena# �'a�rtbir. thus 1� COMUsiait F0rdbg issues a 1.8"TIve Declaratim, 1 SECTION 3: That Fe€atative'Paircel gm No. 3,1146 is he" y u proved SUbject fb t i attacbed Standard ,Co6dittonm and the,_ iplIewiog phial C ?, ©�dttial.s. 1. Ail lrtinont coadit #ons of Tvita fve, Trar�, No. 13279 snarl pri atel fNaiitf'CiFitl '� suet U� o at! bit, The cn site stok Rift Ocilities far, �awcelS 'd a �nau �fi amt, shal ' i{�lil�td - the enroaoh",,nt•­ of , privn* -storm, *ath fit* I,he, r,• Cit', ' gttb�aTt ldra.. Earts., •' 21?e ` C.r 'ref ticca n s r,s b requi d d we .� stow4 ice• thi# �,5. °s se"mSeni, Area. hf, st4rx draft! ,Oetign 3rni ea3 i!9ixZt3 tr6 subJ ctjip f' V,,� O P i� Qf a. itrol shall be m At,.411 slopes an Parcel a to, � the setisi ctftart he Enainosr ad �;#� Building OffiQiat. E, 4 ,PPWRO ANO JMOPTED THIS L3'EH-DAY W dMil it.1 °;fir r PLmklm,a COWS.-; t�i. � IF�E CliYvtlP 6� Ht3 Cilr �t{ME '! �.. � arry T. sts ca rg , er,. _.y" seta I, Brad n7il( _aie utgw -z of ft P �dh in , wonutissi o the . i F.arlaho k*;u pl�a" do horebj t^tif the for�ofng .t#�sc� cation �4i/ cal del *O Ay . Intm bbd, ,: l4ssed; a �s d_ t Plmnn'rn�t, oa i n of the ! City of tahcho C4iCSi1lGric,��, �t a �¢gula. metih ��� Planfnq Ccaanission halts an ttta -13th dty of. Javicitry, 1 8 , by the fall vo'tjto -vii j DYES. Cti3�R+t15:»ii3t NOES: C YS;,IapNE ` rIBSElyr Ct S'vilalfEttS: r K3 ; . n 1, v .. 9 u,ya, 3 e +� Ms IS I Ft Hi w� � all a IN 311 1 i7ij M r' R4 +�! r � as ► $ ,5 d4'�i`j ygi V D� INS +� w �� FF Jill w3° " 3 ka x ,�y {....MK�� wV vit YN ZZ, If I S�� h srsyj .��. c, ► �"p,+� .i, �� ern ��� s a ai Alk w , f &i r mss? ,f V-11 .. .a As +p +1 +AM ii ny x xi DATE JOIu y 13, 1988 TO:' *, a and tamers of the "P`a`omfoo ,C��s�ssiars FROM: Barrye`R,.Peason, senior whi gy: E � ray Kral I, Assistant L i i U . ".� St YEGI s EttV `�,�I NTAE. ASSE�ttT AN4 TEEBTATII P;�i CEL � two 9.a�StS • Ti�.t IJ iiii�..� i "`� _" "ian ` n 0 \ o . rca tar sc u nci p s^'k acii ti v M& -:Vinfeyards, North C ur lty locaw IVA11 00 south t - et,:: .o KenyonVar. (APR 2027 - »0114) A. Action App-en of *ate pre a'l cc ;T-nta Neel Yap r c € >_ Pawl 6.4 $^red 11 i Pali �C l c L64 Totai - ,t �.1ii C. &I 4iil� zoning: Victoria YineyaHs Worth, Vf,:tt3,"►a P?C ed �:o wunity " o Surrounding Land il'se�'�1 North '�ow %dlt6 �, #« W/ r Cle/et� 11V l �. f. 1 mouth i opt dym X 1 4 w, "A o," Dotel 6pwn � bUtr east Low Kwull (4-8 UUM) Nest Low (Z II , "JAC) oevel op" -E, Sur: ar ndi" Generht. Pldin end iJevei nt Cod #}e i` ttai iarrs P 34hed CS}wwAJS /ft South Ictari \ \a I hinted �`t � � r I y , �� j71 PLANNING COR41SSION STAFF WORT � PM 1110 - The William yntt %4,0 Ma ny page 2 East Victoria Plarne4 Comm I Vest - Victoria A'isrnad tona�unifiy I F. S teuJ;ft racteristics< l i,...__. The project, °site is ,vacant and does not contain' any s19nifkcant [i tfegetatioN - o Ti if.YSIS: The purpose of this, -Oi~cel_ °Map .is to divide `14:I2 acres of T►��,`intn i parcels tO create separate parcels fur, a� school site and a city �.<ark site located within the\Mtoria Planme Comity. \ II Public I prove nts�,�iJiclU ing the,Z6rtgnWY ark, along the southerly boundary, are being .constructed with fi ►act ��274 The City park ft beinQ„ r designed at 'thi � _ I 'Ii, ERVIAORMUTAL ''9EVIe t-., The pplieant comb, "etsd " rt i of ,t1uA lnitiaT 1 to %W ecoffi6d a Meld• i'mVe9tfga'tfik�\, a cnapl4ted Part ti t4)f the Initial' Study, RS ad!re�e Impacts u00n the environvent_ are= aRticipafisd as ,_a resuli of this projecc�. Therefore, issuance of Negative C Qecl am. tion S appropriate. tY rnacrc�sutu,.: �►y *�f o,hy �� Jwnr• n i' "' �� have, h9ta cent t= �pkC , property sr+ra ; �te!- planed in the Daily Neport Me7tjpapersF Posting at the site�laas also ate co 6d V. �CdNrE�hQkTIi�9 � It t�'� r i' ti recd ndad that the Planning GnsMis. °l�or; Gon5ide: 'al npu :elea�r �s f . the T'anta►tia� ;Parcel. Hap. if_. after •r4ch cansi rations the � ir�issi i cal reed nu appI�iW, ,then the adoption of the attached RewoTutfon any issuance off:, a at',' 'Doclarstion• would- he appropriate. kspectfully submitted, 41Z44 W) Barvye R. Haqs4n 9 Senior Ctvil 091neet' ) BRH:Bk:sd C/ iuinf ty tag ( xhibit "�4s` ) �� �;. Tentatij!e �shi ix fesol t't-an and, Recorded Candit1O:1O_ Of Jpproval 'i c. 6 . °; QA it O pit �� Pf � .v^ 1. V ♦ i[ 1 -�'". - ,� lit �t,� x t at , �f_� n �• � tt �,. per, W� ��a e �� �P..' r � 1 4`�L `j-., � a �►r�i +yap n€ r 1 t t h *{ kA ``� � r i i t _ 9 ails, f �. � Y�s. -. ��., ` �..� �•4 �. t \ \t ( 4> � i• At = r r .+f .t t ,�}. �� �A Fi`R �� � .� S 1i '° '!� —�.`''r,�1+ � t ♦j \� \�\.� t �.1 �'.n !f L�i �� +yy�e.� �l CI 1 .pry 4 . \ t {r 1 \ ♦'- C. St`{♦ ♦\ '�Ptt b t i}-tt'� 4 S t�r, {��i �" l. :,�; ?r� l �S`in � .�. ri Qli S ♦t, 1 • }1 {ttit :��� i. iii �,,.•einv {'� Ti..l � � t All `' - � i wt J'}'i � ` ♦♦ ;�1, tsr � fs'+{� i i � t` ���� `I� � �, ��� - {�" 11� �. .� I �.+•` i`Y i. i .it. iii a pa$ 1i♦ if, . t t c. .5. �+'`,= t R Y )y�y{ �.aiC� i� A((Y ♦� ♦4 'it i� f i'.� -t'� �'� itti tl\ �Lj F•.��y \. ` s`1 '. 4f ♦ l S! �rrfi SfC J 1\ ,A/V{!lMR C' t 1. 1i; w'. 5' {. t•'' •'� iZ. `J. f '�` 1' �t tt' �, k/ t i `tir lt,� i;,� .r♦ l'�M�"6( r,.'y? .. � f A� �V..S�Q' r�� S fix e i i 1 ti k i SQjf aI i s �Y 4' IZ.�,1 3� $tt i it ' J! — .r�.�d. *. `..�_.,+ *^+��T.,+�>mi �� a 4! t r ,y,.r,,,�•t q� �' .r _.r'a..� .;,�« �t �l f.' U• 4,44. o- l i _ r v � � A RESOLtTIC4 .OF TPE PIING MIS .F J� RANCHO, C �� t�t'..',�" 1{IA. TEKAME PARCEL d+�" , ER Ill _ WHEREAS;, Tentative, Parc0, ftp Mumbor 11106, aubm�iti :'d by'The Grill'1 Lypn Company, applicant, "fe', tht parpose _Of zub&vldln� C:3 z parcels, tht reUt_,property situated ,i a �= Ott€ �of Rancho Cucamn�a esiyrtaf Sas Bernardino, State of C li or'nia, identified'ap APK(s' �67MJ1-t. , located en the soetl side of Victoria- Aark1- ane, we keno tiny; and VNEREAS, on danatary 13, 15 , :bra Planning eissign held a.dUly adver used'publit grin fpr'th a vo- described map�� ROV, THEREFORE. THE RAKlfh CUCMOWSA PLANUM COMMON RESOLVED AS ��_FOLLOWSe , SE &ION t: That tics ibtZaainy findin �`f�ave'b �':saade: k ✓ I,, l'hat the map fs consistent, with the &ner-al Flan. That the improvement of tit* - �ooposed subdivision is consa'stent with tit Seoeratl P7an.`' qP k S. Thst the si is physically suitable for t'. proposed development. 4. TS at the posed subdivision an4 mprovekttts W1 �> not cause sabttifi.ia3 anvi: ��- d t, "aublio e ` health problepsvr baOe i terse efccts on abi4tting property.�Vr SECTION 2 ThWUmmistiost f4'nds and c rtifies that the l project ties been ,reviewed and considered i compliant with the `J California Environmental Quality ftcWgf 19 fund,, furth*r, this Commission hereby issues a Negative t WAW' tion. r l a PCCTION S: That Tentative Para`;:`}` Mop Rio. 11196 is b ruby t g,, ved sc .it3ect fio fie sft"ached „Staoditrd Conditiont and the following Sp`ecda9 Conditions. = J 1, The on -site stow idrarxlt �acflltiis for Nvipi�'f��l,: shall be a privatey *aintalh, syataaa 2nd alf be designed to miniC,1;e the encmI O tnt of t% private stogy dr4;in syst raft the Cft r Pork'Wte. EasWnie ft:d” 'ti0: n 11 nea7F/..C►s k�1re! ° - ' C /'1 r - - � - .... J 1: a 2 ,rti {t8l C,II�1tk"0� Ec �i lie r*qufreii, a1! " tsapes 6tt f i P cl6l to the s ' ��t,�41 of Ut city �nglotest ° J rr 3, Ali . tlbet�.1t coil 5tions of Tentative Fiact 13279 } sha`l'l' 1f ta 0 APPo W(ED 1gs:MMI' THIS lAY fP vim» & LI lNIN6 Qi Is E CI PARCHO, CMAMMK!� Lar ry We` r en 5 \. c� ATTEST" Brad u era ptty r�taXy 1, Brad 6►ui?er, Deputi ,t1ec {�€ t **'f hii i Ee �xSDOi1 tiF tf�! Cry i1 Rancho Cucamonga, do h*r* qer:* v -at #� �csroring R totion teas duiy and - rrgutarly introduced, goo d, and adopted by `,he 'lanMftq, iasiott' of the Ci..ty of,'PA"cho Cuc npi at a rej*1ar wet#rt §,.of, P3aking �0�!'Usi�on �� d on the 13th day of J sivary, 3 , by the totloxirtg Vit WtO -CMI AYES.- COMISSFMRS., NOES: COMMONERS: SEt% F '`OWISSIOWERS. c TS s Lit �I Itz _ «e'�e M = Gi �e _ --' yu x s its B"Lit s 3 1 L: 01 ) ' 41- OV if s r yy jay/ �l 3gI Y•� � M,.y y ♦ w Lj y 1 4l < via lot I ZJL it 4 1! AI 3N Go 7.4f It tz zil !I IRS , cl. /0701-02 1-13 -88 PC Agenda -- �? _ -e_ _�_ �_- , of 4 r OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- uz" , DATE January 13, 1088 TO: Chairmn. and "ars of tip Planning�rmwission PWOM. same Hanson, SeAlor Civil-, Ergivaer BY. Betty Miller, Assittart Civil Ergin'imr'` SUBJECT: ENVINNMWAL ASSES NT ARD TENTATIVE PARCEL 14AP 11236 - BARTON l E ­A s ±e s rin o r s acres or a n :tars parcel s miustrial Park Development District, subarea 7, bounded by Spruce Avenue, Red Oak Street, and Laarel Shat (AP$ 208- 351 -23) z 1X I. PROJECT AP SUE DESCRIPTION., A. AkAton do Requested. wBAppraval bf the proposed Tentative �'r {a���el yelp as s. uxrr x S Parcels5 Size: , Parcel I I1 . �rcel 2„ s TOTAL T.W C. Existina 2 nin (, Industrial Parke Subarea 7 of the Irzdustrial,Specific Pisa` f �f D. Surroun diptig@ Llse;: South Vacant. East - ;Yacant wost Ovf1ce Buildings E. ASugrnundigg General Plan and Develoomt Code Desigrrationsa , N rth - 1� atrial Park, '.qubarea 7: Food + South I� ` atria?, Park, Subarea 7: Hospital Offisi�park East - Ihbustrfal Park, Subarea ?., Food -_f&v ' West Industrial Park9 Subarea 7: Offirw�ari& jj r y a r ITEM L PLANNING COMESS & STAW WORTS TENt. PARCEL l#AP 12,:35 ;s ,JANUARY 363, 1988 i � PAGE 2 F. S,irt Chtractiris'tics: li I J This site Is-,vacant and slopop gently, tiwa` South. t J� The purposq of this Parcel',Kep is to crate $ (t) separate parcels to be developed individually. Develoinoant review procedures have., bftn initiated for 0 restaurant on Parcel i. That application has( of yet i} been d ;40 and therefore has not burr scheduled or' any,,. deveU wnt or, staff review aktieti0gs. Should changes ` be ref ired for toe' restaurant site daring tht <, review pr�K _s5, there Would ,\ e, greater oppor%n'i'y to coordinate the two, applicattioba .If they were pKtessed concurrently, Stuff hat recomandW that the parcel rip and the Oevelopm of Review be b ght t4 the Planniog Covaission a�� tho ,. same time. Howevgr, the applica � has spe�Yficelly � requested that the parcel leap precodc �elopmt-,rzl1 ��. for efiier pircaf,� Tl public s *.reef, ars aunt the pax =cel +aaa a<r a1 a y is s 6Otred; with „pon devetoon of .parker it srova nts wrhich are gaairr:d ti be completed the exCepti The appl ;cant is e?tpatGted -tg take1��te witf�taff's recoandation that n4 drivewray access gSlowrad on Red t3a:Lreat t5peclal C^ndition i). According to It al of P1an� ng „C aaisSiora R xolutioh No. 7G -89 (copy attacned), e100- atccess to 41 \ a or rnc# stcondary thoroughfares shall be dedicated 'to the City whe wuita6le arltstrrtattive access can be developed frow 'local or go1'lec streets. There is an existing delvew *y on Spruce Avenue and a pr J sad; ds�iv yon Laurel. Ste cart. bira► coaribino4 cap4dtlr of thea'e two drier4+s is beiireen 1,600 and 2,00Q trips per hour: Cstiaaated traffic , volumes were calculated assuming a restaurant similar to -Harry C's On Parcel 2 and a smaller one on Parcel li per the preliminary review ail \site plans vet to be rtsubmitted. The combined per*,; femur traffic. fqr these t restaurants will be approximately 400 trips. This' is well within the capacity of the drivet"s on Spruce Avenue and Laurel' greet, r 7 The intersection of Spruce Aven”, and tied Oak Ste , t includes sfree right turn lane ,'fer southbourv, tt5 wes�und traffic. -This will eroate,a speed differential between through 4rA4 111'c Woking the turn and traffic slowing for the driveway- (refer§ to "l 01bit *C"). With', frontrio on Red Oak Street less'than 300 Y-44t in length,, this is a safety concern. r j PLANNING C"ISSEOR STAFF REPORT TENT. PARCEL MAP 11236 , JANUARY 13, 1988 PAGE 3 Stafir,hiRs recowended,,that'an in -View fief a-�contributicn to tha cost of construction of tt* median on Foothill vaulevard be paid. prior to. recordation of the Final iAap (Special Condition 9). The Developer has expressed a preference to defer the fee payment which is ,currently secured by a lien agreement. Staff fc�,%is that the po nt, _of felts is appropriate because construction of the median is anticipated in the near future and staff has experienced, some, difficulty collecting on ,lien ^` agreements. It is noted' that the Commission ands a `,determination in October 11*7 `het fee payments were preferred to .lien r agreements, for utility undergrounding. y � Similar, requirements (no driveways on Red Oak and wredian fees) were placed on ,Parcel Map 710617 located to the east (refer to Exhibit *A11) which was approved by the Planning Commission on Koveirbgr 10, 1987: r, III. ENYIRONME TAL REVIEW: The 'lappiicant compl eted' Part I of the Initial. Study. _ conna`cted a field investigation and completed Part IF' of the Initial Study. - No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore,,issuance'of Negative Declaration is appropriate. �} IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public He ring ha�c� been, sent: to nurroundf g i�x property owners and placed the Dairy Report Newspaper. Posting at,/Ae site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is Otcommended that the Planning Coammission consider all 1,npUK7a_M elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such`- consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the at:achrd ResOution and issuance of as Negative Declaration �rould La appropriate. Respectfully submitted,, ; - 8arrye R. Hanson �a Senior Civil Engineer OR€i;BM;dlar Attachments; Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (ExAibit "8 ") Driveway W44 (Exhibit V) f, ResoFutiail . 76 -29 Resolution and ^ qW Aecom ende Co,yditians of Approval„ ' fy �y cr. it I I - _ • 7 10, eC� �°' '� �,. 'a r° raM Oaf '�+' r f rr _ �• ` �` l� ell+ �• . r r �,• fY r .. tae► I aa` �� w rI r1 `A lot, 4 r' r L RESOLUT M NO9 7S =19 A REMUTIOR Oi THi 4Lt1,NNZNG CONKSSION OF TU ClIrr Esl+' MS0 (TCA194'RIGA ESTAAtUU1 , ACCE`3;5 POLICt Pori :! :ifA�:iii�,Faft3 � �HCgttti�t3f"'�1Rg# ,, - WS cg, the Planning Cotmiission` of^t'he Qity of �* cho Cues- monga recognises than to aaaintain capacity, eff tie %y alid the e*i aty of traffic flow on major And Secondary thavoomilar", it is nacessgry to 114it and control access; and �t WWFAIS, it is necds=ry to establish policy gaideliaea to allow property ovners fronting an said streets to, p�;operly an the use ., of their 174"and. � l HQ 1, �' 8ziT.jmS 3Ly= Amb, iAB,it� titan for d+sv+r2op,. anent of propertics fronting on all imejbr and rtetc+1SW3ar!r thoroushf�trew the foilowin& ltriteria _ mWl be yibse.-74d In relation to secesaa coa le . `,' Z , Son access to all'kajor and secv�davy tbououghfasrea�sh& be dedicated to the CIty vhavevar suitable alternaxly* *csss may bat do4aloped f=n lovAl cr crsllecto# streets. l) .. 2. Wnare access M-it be granted to la wjor or "concir�7y thorough- fares said accesat shall be liasite:i�ts oas pests: for;; 340 fast of frontage at one Point per parcel with less i6an 300 fast of fiOntaga. It is the intent of the ;policy to establish a minimum 300 feet appicint -�bat> *en d;4vewaya. 3. cot+b�ncd access to uslor Land sliicondary tboroqhfares betweea adjaae` r, properties shali be encourag d wherevow 'Ossible to „reduce thee, numWr of cncroachmetit.3. 4. Accesai points shall wherever ! ssiblga be locamk a m1nimum of one hundred c1QQ) feet !Tote the and of Curb rak�a a Ott` .ngsszcCions On 4 lane or w1d jr h!ghways. \ " 5. Where otherwise compatible with this policy access shall be located;appos; , e:- existing or planned access pa nt* of the opposite sija aof the Streit.. C Variations from these policies viii require approval of the Community Devel6g*a tt Director of the City: of Rancho Cucamonga subioct to appeals to the Plataning Comsti.aaiot,. , j�1 J y, 4 i n U c S'tT ti APPROvta AM ADO= TSI'S 8T8 bAY of mml 197�f. PLONING COMISSIOX tilt THE CXTr or eta. o CiTT€.`AMltGA By. r ,t- kissasu ` &s�pati, Cbgtitst+sp, _ , ATTES?S' Aj ; Set re:eary ml 'tlta Pik C+aweti #�iC�' I. JAC! %A?ir f "r rS Sa +rtaa ttm Pl*mlt4 Cosnia #on of -flaa City of :la=ho Cuca m*&, Oj� i� voy caettifY 'that th* for" Ra OUition was ,duly and ragsal+etrly ittt8oduc04 ;P44", Ara tad by t4*-4' annitt� comix-45mion j I th* `"tY of 1�r atria CU' aMc#t sd at, a zoxnlaz "at"s oklibe4plaanin Ca itFaxion elwith tbi 2 Ad, day lof . �S7�kby this followini vu,ter " AYES: COMMISSIONW -t 'TC VM, GwrA,, DAM,� _ ~ NOES: C�iifiIS529tiR3': ttt7ltE ` ,4 ASSENT. CoxsszOl NM (i �V �I l u. J b 0 RES YTION NO. J A RESOLUTION of THE PLk*I COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C CALIFWMI C- OWPITI N ALLY APPROVIING TENTATLYE�rlIAP t!Ule3f,R 11236-, 7 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel lapp Witter 11235, submitte by gart�rt Development Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, '.*"real property situated in the G #tY of ttanCho ucaaton' County of Sant Be ardloo, ,; of California, identified as - 353, -23� bounded by. tate Spr ;ce Avenue, Red OTC Street and Laurel Streets. and . WHEREAS, on January 13, 1988, tint Planning' Commission a duly advertised public hearing for the, above-described 40 Now, THERerm, m tmcHo CUCAAIm Pt.%-m-Mt ?i& Coi missiom,'REsoLvEa As;,,t FOLLOWS., ti) SECT ON I: That The following findings "6ve been made: 1. That the asap is consistent with t14 general Plans. 2. That the °improvement -of the proposed subdivision isO consistent with the teneral Plan. 3. That the site is physically, suAAble for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed sub (d Ision and imprt vements vt-11, t not cause substantial envirdAhntal daa&ge,- public. health problems or have adverse affects on abutt6j' property. - -: SEcnow 2: This Cdwission finds and certifies that the project has � been revi an considered in compliance with tKW California Environ- mental Du.lity Act of 1970 and, further, this Com fission tzreby issues a Negatfve Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11236 is hereby+ approved s0lect tat a ached Standard Crsndlttons and the following Special Conditions: 1. to driveway access will be allowed onto Rkd Oak Street. I, "`q � ..,�..� -;t • ���• ,.. a _.., _ -.- iYTiO�i ^� kZ PAGE 2 j Lo. 10 -liar ffe +as'santrib4tion to the future-' - ' � = onstructfon sh shall f* tto !t1w within to dw anct of uilcing pes its or approval or the Fietai i�A ,uei i±4g. -0ijN' 4r- ccurs firs The ((' alc4nt d 'th`s -fee shall be probated, on ' . er acre ° basis frog the -total fj*,- _attfi�lutabie too *rcei Rap No. 10444. `. `hat total f` shall .bre one half the cost of 14W, 7'tedfan (currently estiriated at $0 per- .� lirear foot) 41*�% the length 0 fhe foothill Boulevard fext'G itz"Im" a ors ecty� of the 4esielrly l right -or" -way lim for Aspect 55treet to & projection' _ J0 u of the eees"terly right -of -way iir t for,Spruce Avenue. !, APPROVED x"' 1401TEo vis DAY OF viBs. ; .�, PLANNING COMMISSION OF,THE 'CITY O RANCHO CJ� GA BY: 3` J arry� WRie ATTEST: 01 ra Bd Su'ler, u ecre!tary r, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Pl nnning Coauissit�t the` City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resoiutietn wAs, dulyf and regularly introduced, passed, a<a pteg platRngVtion Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a .i taipr meeting of the Planning toWxsion hel� on the * day'of *, 1986, by tNe following votel >eit., DYES: f•P"tRISSIOFRS; NOES: COIFlI BSiktBRSe... • ABSENT: COW1S I09ERS. rJ 1 1 17j a' _vYr Xt . n -R-�i� k -115 is Sl ..- � € s All zl*g I '04 I Ila ii, IL I Mi I 4a lit s f a x j 22 W .� _ � ' ■� �`i � �i 1I Y ' #1� Rol �� �aK � �� ���@� „ . I l_ "",v ' ark J G n s f OA It It > - Y ,J i, 4 11 b� t. @ !If s _ _ r/ Hit xz� _444 i C 9 • �i: Y� 07 Eg` w �+ re y aY q� ►X 33_p3 223 i .2 lit a _ _ lap, , y - 4"Zk Y V pg_M "ItC jilt K bwV K7 ��� isffi� ��49 o h i I O k q ♦_ lw9 e ' $ K tuck, 31 AAft fg� vim. e J V a Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT J DATE: January, 13, ;E ^Ez ;U: Chairman ands ers of the Planning Ctweission 1977 FROM: Brad Butler, Cfty Planner r BY: ie verly Nissen„ Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENViR NtFIdTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13621 �j - A residential subdivision apa des gn re"'iv ew-7 s ng e family 'Pots on 6 4,cres of land in the Very4 Low � Residential nDlstrict (less -than 2 dwelling units" per acre), J%ated at the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Hillside Road - APN 201- 101 -04. Associated with the tract is- Tree Removal P40wit 87 -93 requesting the removal of four (4) mature Eucalyptus trees. RELATED FILE Variance 87 -17 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIDN: it j A. Action Requestede Approval of subdivision design, conceptual grading pan, u icing ;elevations, pilot plans, Tree Removal Permit 87 -93, and issuance of a Negative Decla;retiion. B. Project Densit : 1,68 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Lwad Use and- onin . or vacant ;a�>�e ng e� amily Dwelling; Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant and Chicken Ranch; Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant, One Single Family Residence and Chicken Coops; Very Lew Residential (less than 2 dwelling j units per acre) West - Vacant and One Single Family Residence; Very Low, Residential (less than 2 dwelling units -per acre) D. General Plan resignations: Project size - very Low Residentiai (less than 4( d"Tfle(' wits per acre) S North Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling uf-r s per acre) C South Very Low Residept #al (less than 2 dwelling unx4s per acre) ,� East - Very Low Residential (less thaa� 2 aweiling units per acre) West - �trt Low Residential (loss than 2 dwelling units per acre) 1iEPi H PLAWIV WkSSIC STAFF REPORT TENTi�T, TACT 13621 - NORDIC JdtSuP.rY 13, 198f. paE 2 U - - A E. Site Chang teristics: Tts site slopes frost northeast xo sou'iTiwrs - pp `o Three "mately 8 percent. rvidenges and chicken "I currently OCCUPY the site. The Nib -dwelling is to remain as i6 the second re anal, accessory b ailui1g. The third dwelling on the site, which ris slated for demolition, went before the Historic Preservation.;�oteaaissiom on December 3, 1987? It was determined that wire research needed to be 1 completed on the structure ftnown `as the Schewalter Hauser and was reschftWIed to the danwAry 7, 1968 PAStoric- Preservation Commission, seating. An _ oral pr+esentatioP of the Historic, Preservation Comxissior,`s action will be given at the meeting.`,-, II. ANALYSIS. 1 A, Generals The applicant is proprsi,V�,to d3vetop seven lot$ ranging in size from kV,080 square feet to 33,000 scivatw feet in area. The a,Kei< 9e lot -size within the tract will be 23,269 square feet in free. Tito applicant is proposing +6 utilize the smelt floor plans, e16vationz, colors and aaaterf"als as were previously pproved or Tracts 12902 and '13644. lH 1natii 7 of Model ° , 2650 and 2200 will be utilized. ° Eech of the proposed�loor plans have three elevations. There are two- existing singqle family dwellingscon whe sit6, 1) a 3,000 square feet �siAenc+e, and 2) a 1, 350 simare feet residence._, The xatailer dwelling aatap+ remain on ti*}sits'as a legal nonwconformfng ,4se. The applicant has tndica aid that the owner may bo converting it to q gar e. S. Deesi n_Rev awJ Committee The Design Review Co"ittea ('col ;stoY, Eee— ROC c, coTeman )—AWN ew-nd Oe proposal on December 17, 1987 and rscoawtended approval subject to t`­ modifications: 1. She decorative, block wall to be constructed 41c:g Hillside Road shi utd continue north along HerAosa Avenue to a point just` south of the existing second dwelling unit. The wall is to be constructed of alumpstor,a to match existing,, or � approved walls. 2. A revised conceptual ,gr�4ing plan which` reduce the difference i'r o-leviition be it gads Was presented to the Coe itta; and approved by theaai. 3. The Committee indicated they would prefor, „to gage a four font sidewalk on the east side of Himo;aa �_• venue rather than t#a''interin eqqs trian wail i rcaoltd by the irs � Advi” ry Ciralt Ottee. '' A 20 foot dedicated equestrian trait c w eventuallY be loceted on the west side Of t PLANNING COMISSIO:J STEF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13621 � ORDIC Jarsuary 43y,1%8 Page 3 Hermosa wh�4 that parcel is developed. The Cowittee fell it would be preferable to abtaf ; ili «hQ sidewalk -and !andscaping on the east side. of' ` Hermosa now rather than constmicti%q it at the> City 'i ; expense in the future when the :nr its Trai -the side- t sCt;d;` c�ap'b'dte'd� If the. Commission decides t!,�ey would prefer to have tte four foot sidewalk on theitaast side of Hem - osa constructed at this . time, they Wst delete or mod6fy-NUnditidn W) 2 for Tentative Tract 13622 in ,iiii 4t0c6d Resoluttnn ar4d Condition No. L.3 uocdep "91opering in the - Standard Ccnditions, C. Trails Advisory C�oWMees The Ct itteg' revtwed t; )roject `\ o Move;We 1 n3— recce nded app"�val su0ject' to the � fol l ovr ngry`�ndi t. ons c E I, A _20 f�: t Cowuni ty Trail Is tole pr�avido d .11 ng the norti side of Hillside Road. -. 2. A 12 foot CoLmmunity -T ail ion ,i atent xit -the trail la4ated,;to the north shoild Ae provided on 6 the east side of Harmosa Avenue. This would' serve as an;fnterim trail connectia � until tip 20 t foot - trails` is, �pleted on the west side _of 114ihwo5a. - �` . 3. A 15 foot local trail is to tie provided west of l lots !' 5 and 6. J is 4. A 12 foot local; trail is to be provided along the.: east tract boundary, D. Free Removal Permit, „ As4ociated with the deveijpment 0 the rac—'t, app t° ,* cant-' h4s submitted- a trap Koval yer jt requesting the removal of four i4) mature Eucalyptus trees located - along the northern project boundar}. Tile remain6g Eucalyptus trees (approximately 10 along the north properi; line and 25 atjong the east property boundary) ark tc� _be f' retained as pal` of the s0division. " L Enviror ntal Assesmaente Staff -gas completed the nvl~"i onm�t;n a ec is and found n significant aciversq,n �� envirow,,nta? impacts as aresult of, his project. i`,f i -. AIMk % Planning Commission concurs�It stir these findings, Issuance of``at Negative Declaration 'if tare r, w: e appropriaie Yentati�fe tract map is approvedf ; „ 4 f ,INING Cm6sros STAPF REPORT Page 4 illw FACTS FOR FIND! W `"tha profect is caWsten tirith the General an 554,M " it rr'�tY p t r it pmjik i, with tha Odds& Mitigation * &&SUM will F.�t b41,4trimntai to the public health or safety, or�causa nuisag,4es b!�'si grit fftani adverse envirsxssientall Al i►spacts. dOtion; j propwmd ase and site plan °tog�tr'�or ` _ with the r naed cod, ittons o, approval, are i11ocn"'6Aaitca rrith the applic pr�io�ts oil 4e'. Oevelopo Code and City - sfandards. �� J � i♦ c IV. 'iGaRRESPQ x.W yrit w, itesG has .' advertised as a ' pubs : ltaarP4 n neat pa►� and' �ahticeaJ re. cent to at property r; own @: i it n eet of t1ice . �g RECOMMATION Staff that ihm Flennting Cow,�si�:; aee Trs�t 1 approve :4n w adoption of, the attached Resolution of Approval * th conditions, I Rmr a3 Permit 87-93f and issue a mega Res ul ly �i City F nnex . 1 i Attachments.\ EXh�bi ~n�Y�i� tior. !ia ,/tiaster Flan , act tiap Exhihitj ..itras" Finn Exhibii'#''� r, lElevatipils�� Exhit►it " :� Crags kovai Resolutfwn if Aiprovai_,wtth Conditions PP!r a r. atr if E.. vim,.... -G �,..,.�,�.�. .....o�y., .....tn.,+.ar.. �. olL emomw mim of vL [ t a y oars *a visas+ $ � � R�� E� l � I Pt s R 'P5 4 �.+►1r�r fa.e -�� qt t r � I Pt s R -amc ied-' Amok sAffstv 40041, Till, Re" NOV VV arm' W PP, 4*4 no Lp . lw it rt. Via' 704% Maw Z's —Am CITYCF TME- - RANINIONG LWZqCN At,,E 7 fy� -t� .N .e w Tit swa.ov, 48199 SO J, cn d <Ja,- ,l%' nTki f S Te EXHttT 4 r �ilOf�t..•i�QM1$xlie� K \� �pi r' .N .e w Tit swa.ov, 48199 SO J, cn d <Ja,- ,l%' nTki f S Te EXHttT 4 \ it i {{FFSS wP/fwt Cu I SCI_ I RANCTD CUCAMONGA tit _ Hoy i } F -XHIW= � SbLE, .�_. .. _ _ ,. .. _rlMfil� "� #rtjw�► rwe� J ii s, :xis i st:'. .'. � #���t � y r% xlsayt k" '"` , ate` � ,�.,_ "!C �+'d �� w C, riitYll:l l'.N /� i �+�•..►„`� i [all Crff € \T,L� RAINNING ME W, o lxr�e�r� � Q� ���• ��11` ewe t ar.� ' Ltt.L.�LeA. r 22000 ,. i 9 G{ 1 w \r �r r _ k _ 1 Y r j J ` ' r.T TrrE: MC `� r/�(. 1 wr* 000 V • ••~ � L.J` ' Y. �i"h'�A it � � S Ul" Nisi WJVA710N IM�Mt 010[ CLlVATICN ID ED" t* i. PAM VAVA"M ` w'��s.ul a st- •�...�.�._.. .�-..- ....r ^mw • ,..., ItOGP R.AAI vn rQ ..a.w. F1k'JWILWA i0 , NMM CITY C TnU. PLANNL EXHINT: .#` " f e• yyy� LiN EMI s OM oi—I MM Elm LEFT 14101E nevA- 10N FEtONT ELEVhTi@N =- LIDI L ! j'D MONT 14104 EUVAM.4 :.. - `� .• ,t.% —.; E!t:,141 EriIVATtOR r _ r N UH 'im CIT AV CF OLAN i r Dix Q ! -'• _ [ X gpM � �. r "l RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLA90ING C0194ISSION APPROVI6'�- ?:VF1TIVE TRACT MAP NO, 13621, K RESIDENTIA-1 SUBDIMIbit AND JOESIGH REVIEW OF 7 SINGLE WILY LOTS ON 5 ACRES W LANG. IN THE VERY. LOW RESIOENTIrZ OISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORMAST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND HER#40SA. STREET AP� 9101- 101 -04 A. Recitals. (;) Nordtc Development has fii$d an application for the approval of Tentative Tract VAp No, 13621 and Desfgn Review thereof as .described In the title of this Resolution: Hereinafter in this ,,Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Hko request Is referred`to as "the ai plic?;,,19 "`. C (ii) On ;the 38th of January, 1988, the Planning CorAwis,14on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly„ noticed public hearing on the application and conclude( "aid hearing on that date. iii, l) All legal prerequisites to t1he adoption of this Resolution - have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it i;­`; ereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning CcmIssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as folluws:, 1. Ibis'towlssion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in ttre Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct." 2^ Based upon ,substantial evidence presented to this. C i'ssion, during the above- referenced public hearing on January 13, 1988, in quding written aid oral sta f reports, togeti•er with public, testimony; this Commission hereby speci� cally finds as follows: (a) a application applies to property located at the northeast corner of III side Road and Hermosa Street with a C et frontage of 630 feet along Hillside Road and 280 feet along Hermon Street and is presently improved wiles ­�igle fasrily dwellings and chicken coops; ana (b) The prop 1rty, to the north is designated for residential . uses and developed with one s ngle family dwelling, the pr perty to the youth is designated for residenti uses and developed with a chicken ranch, the property to the east is de gnated for residential uses and dwaloped with one single family dwelling and chfckerr ,. coop3, and the property to the west is designated for residential uses and is developed with ane single family cal ling; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of ,approval, t, complies with all minimum development _,standards of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga; an PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13621 - NORDIC' sanuary 13, 1987 Page 2 - ., (d). The propbsal is In". compliance 'iYith the faster Plan of 0 1 Trails and the ebjogives of the Equestrian Overlay Oistrfv*' and ie) ;e Bevel �~ o;*nt of 7 single family, on X11 of. Viand is cons;stent witit the Very M,aw Resident at `s design "the General Plan. 3. eased upon the substantial `evidence presented to this Cemmissidh ` during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific f ndings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission herebj!4in4s and concludes as follows; I (a) That th�tentative tract inconsistent with the General Plan, the ob,4ectibes of the Development Code., and specific pl. ,4ns;and 1"1 (b)` The design or improvements of the tentativt tract is consistent Wits the General Pram Development Coder; ' specific plans; and (c) The site is p*s c ii ly suitable for the type of deVel opment i hposed; and (d) 7iie design of tihe scthJivisfan is not likely to cause :ssvbstantial �Mranmental daage.- and avoidable injury to hWans and wildlife or their habitat; and i (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public healtZbf probleaR, and (f) The design of the tative tract will not c6zflict with any s nt acquired by the ? r public at large„ n of record,for access through or usp of the grope within the iI proposed subdi�tilpian. �;� 4. This .Commission ibere0y finds and certifies that the project has been revs wed and considered in compliannce with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 ands further, Wi- Cowaission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. �. S. 3ased.0 on the findings and canclusidns„ -set forth paragraph 1, a and 3 above* this Commission hereby approves the pplicatio� subject_to each and every conditipn "set forf~h below and in the rattached Standard Conditions attached her' et *,and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMIS$109 RESOt.VTION No, ; TENTATIVE TWT 1362',- Wft1C January 13J) 1567 Page 3 K a Z ts- bract Hain 13621 t1) A 20 °foo, "1aar, unobtructedy�i ttt ommunity ' Equestria XItaii Shad " be provided Gong the north side of aside—Road. !S'� (2) A 12, root :Clair, unobstructed ed Comun# } Trail shall rbe provided' consi .ste pt� with the trail I 1Ocated tO the north' of Tna�ci� �2td a�is�nq�� lie easy side of ilerftsa ,Avenue. (3) A 15 foot 1 clear, unobstructed lfkal <, trail s0alI ba ,. provided west of lots 4b 6 and 6., The existing. block mall to -01e Wst of Lat^ which 11oald obstruct the. If', ia foot jequestrn trail shay be r*aavedn (41,-k- 12 � f "t clear, -unobstructed lbocal,J trail is to fi e�l � .. -p►4avided along the east tract b%ndary, t5X underground Utilities; �> . a, Hillside Roao - ThceAistiii overhead utilities (telecommunication and ill ectricAl) on the 1 y; project slik af,; tiills'ide Road shtIT be, undergounded. frW the first pole on t46 west Side of Hermosa. Avenue to the first, pale offsite east of the protect's east boundary;s „prior ,_to puIMC - IMPPOVelaent acceptance or occupancy, Wchnvrtt ctms first The developeriwy request a r0mburse t agr eament to recover ne -half the City adopted cost for undeegrounding `from future, development (redeiilopoent) as it occuti -s op the opposi side of the street. b, Net osa Avenue - The, Cx1sting overhead utilities (teleca" icat�ior And electrical) on the project std HOYAOse `Ave * shall be undergounded frog[ thr' first pale tin tho south `> side W Hillside Road to the fii°st pule offs,te north of the project's nortt boundary, prior to public -Improvement acceptance or "Occupancy, — whichever caws first. The davelct r Y t request `a reimbursement agreeoo ".;ix,' t* vet one -half the . City adopttd ''cost = jor uiidergrounding from future t!?n►?� { c, (redevelop,''), as it occurs on the opposite side of t na- 4treet. " C j� PLANNING COMISSiON KSCLUT14N Wok % V) � TENTATIY& TRACT 13621 - WMIC 2} ,. Januarv, 13, 1987 Page 6 - 11 - - - - - (6) Thar. Alta Loma Basin, locate ti the SolltTf cif the site shall be omavated to provide sufficient storm water-, : retention to offset the increase runof terarated by ,` the developMent prior to occupancy of it'r buildings, Design Reviear' shall "ar6und 'windows -Detailing be provided oil on all — el erati AS (2) A decorative sluapstano block tall shall be constrruCW along Hillside Road and along: Hermaso Street to a point just south of the existing second dwelling unit., -The design and location of the walls Shall ba shown on the la cape plans which shall be reviewed and appproved► Planner taithe ,City prior j issuance of building pits, 1 6. The Di'iputy Sacrettry to this Comissioh shall '�certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1987, PLANNINS COMrSSION OF "THE CITY OF `fLt,4CHO CUCMDGA BY: ar�^y e_�, agrazn ATTEST: rad 'Rpu y secretary 1 -I, Brad Buller,, Deputy, Secretary of the,Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga', -do ie mby certify that'the foregoing Resolution was duly an+ U regularly intrslouced, p.hssdd, and adopted by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho CucaaK;a on held �;, at a regttlar,mtetfng of, the Planning Co�aisSt on the 13th day of Januery, 1987, by the vdte -to -wit: , i AYES:,CgtIISSIWiIERS» NOGSf COWISSIONERS.: a c� so 7 y x r 1 � � UPS I At aft x Y � Y I's= w �r a • . Rge , � . ~ ~_+d �� N tit {y^� Y {y iy. ��g E Nall M HIS R. a� Y, is �I M 1� l MM e�N° On 1,3Y j Y Y � _ ilk �g S al �'•� qM�A Kiw '.y is •ry p M;• ���• C�_ N�� i �+� Yp�ii! NS�kq Y'�• y¢R �i' 1� 3 �s gasse in V x M r = q Y � is !pas d Sal # Nr3w i � Lwo l� � +YY�L�L iwAp ff sif 3 NIB Nit !.n! _ «.." 6 l MM e�N° On 1,3Y j Y Y � _ ilk �g S al �'•� qM�A Kiw '.y is •ry p M;• ���• C�_ N�� i �+� Yp�ii! NS�kq Y'�• y¢R �i' 1� 3 �s gasse in V x M r = q Y � is !pas d Sal # Nr3w i � Lwo 1,vvs' YS Se Y$aK `i. R �i .+iq. yig�w �M1F a;4XIM'ii @V VH VQ V9Y y 3G ME q s- 99 rN 1ay" � y4,8 y ¢mi `1 16 I air.. N H Gk's ass 1CCIA µ' try x9-4' 14.2.$!j _ '^g 1, ^ 1.: 'I za It •. y ^ e g O Liz =� rt s �I «V "'' > "Q as a� �« ill'- 4¢y AGM{ «G � Ho _ B t.3"i s-0� ! Z.2 cyr+ IIa YiNq 6j 6pN y$1' g�i 3fi x r �« �4 9 ii4a� C "zi 4wp .r. +'y k!! Y Iv. 1*111 V3 zza y N s v Y at a1v W 13 figs y N+y+ v. �g YYFF'lNu v 0 $H91 f� vv 4 s, av� 6. O Y W 7� M N owl r_ �P a. tit •t 2 lip fill ut SA In �$� s = Sin �. g. las Al t 2i YYi a M �M r ji .;es w N �a00ia ;I w Y' N y�y4` MN � n � +iii p Y N f Y V VV Y�Q iY a Y� yy i L T VA yq x ® C{ �d Ij}+•__ �3 r } x 6 yys{ r• M ��'Ae. M �wLir L'Y Yf��� Y �Yy iY s3 pdW � V tom.. � 11 ySi� 4• y. +I• If Ls �'���� H 1 a Z-03 O� V r is I.,�'� ` �Y► w. r YY{.�Y Y$ w41'. al >N jMC 4 Yi1 y�a11 oo ii yy Y ■al 2 `Y �, V 1+.. ll '•! a '.: 3Jf O ��F• EY Pa _ N .S g ;Sr° i, IL �A5 # JI N M Npp �y rL'M ri Its ; s�MMMM _ paF s� `y 4�, -,�� iY ® �:a �► 5. ` : ,.�r� . ��w� �+• ;�«: r is �':. ,�t �� �� � �t_��« �`�a'��� •• \ \ _ is g. °�� '�' v.. `.t. a'�ii x:t L a. �y.�i .,s �N�� aawa 5...�'�.�. - \._ .rii�,r`� 4~i .i i fit 4 4 -Let N S� ' hit i �R 17YY` �. ONO std" Nr■ s ++ u er s � a x pis •'� »� N.'� sa r1 Liz; � war it F� �~ w a tyR�� N M Ito } r itV s Is it N T 1i K Y � t N AN r 8 � ^ N yp� v�M N �~ w a tyR�� N M Ito } r itV s Is it N T 1i K Y � t N AN r al 67" r o � o ,�r spa yyyY �. r �® wel � t -1 �s t sic �3E NON a;" '_ " a w N Q w � � Y Y a Ei6 ` Mwww pn. dY N.a iRYq LQ 7 ?...° 3Y a,(C Y w. YYY • -;r�i 'r MYp .mow ,ty 8�•r�, »!. i..�. Hpp .�i�'�y a � Wrly OF RkNC O CUCLTAO NG REPORT a o,3 alp DAr January 13, 1936 ' if ,z 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of tt * nnins.. Ctsa+ossion FR% Brad Buller, City Planner _ BY. Beverly 9 ,s sen. Assistant i lartn r r SUWECT: ENVIRt3 ltTAL_ A55ESSWN ' • VARIWE 37 »7,7 - 140901C - A ��. regttes re t.. e-risi ire rear yar , se ac roto 30 fret 9 fkeN for 'one.lot of a seven lot subdivision on "5 acres -0 :laced in the, Very Lnw residential 1 District Eless thaneVdwelling units per acre), located o' the northeast corner of Hemaaa Auerive and Hill��de tfoS {d Aft* 201 - ;�l Relati d ;lea /. Te%tatiY6 Tract 13621 I. PROJECT AND 'SITE i ESCRIPfiog: j A. motion Requesfidr � Approval,,') of Varlarce and Issuance of a i ega ve ec Ara on: i Pura ott -nd+n tend, Use and c _ or acarr an 'one s ng a �4elling; Very -LQ kosidential (less than 2 dwalli ' un•lts"jPqr acre-" South Vacant : and chicken ranch, Veri�__Imfi'q_and, ` ResidtdtiAl i'`cks / t� =ah s duelling units per aor `N Exist - Vacant and me single family Aicken - coops; *i7 tow Residential (less than 2 dwell!na units per acre) West - Vacant and one single famiv dwelling, V�rV `i tint Residential !less than z dwelrite %fits peltrcre) C. General,,, Plan Desi natirns: o ec `15T ` "very W l esidenti'al (less than 2 ruling u6jts /� � per acre). !forth - Very Low Residential ties: than 2.4relling units per acre) South a Very Low Residential Mess than a, wel'3irsg units per- acre :, i• East b Very tow Res,�entiai.. (less tan i dwelling units bier acre) We$t - Very Low Residential ( ,,ss -thca 2 +dwelling units: par acre) JL- _ r ITEO N 4� i KANiiM WOUS&IOR STVF REPORT variance 87 =17 a NoWic " January 13, 1988u Page. AMIN. 11. ANALiSfi: A. General- The applicant is proposinj� to.,develop an :existing_ ve =ro parcel into seven lots with-an .an average lot size. of 23,289 square feet. Threp residences and chicken chops - currently exist qn Me site. The gain restdence; which- is approximately 3,00 square On . i15'' h sec6nd smaller ds lling F which is` apps =tOately 1,30 ,xq fare set are to t°eaain, it e third dwelling, located on the riortheaft corner,of Hermosa. and Hillside load Is siated for removal. At *e tim of approval_, for 'the existing dwelling -it met al r thetAisimuat, requi'ramants fol rear a�ndG,.�ide yard setbacks. At `f'or the time of" prior approval construction of the housa� °the line Hermosa ' propel ty parallel to Avenue was conii&re; the trait Tot line, whilt',the property line patrallei to FiK }"'side Road ;vas con1dered the side lot line. With the proposed subdivision of the parcel, tbe.,twc exiting dwellings will be located on a� lot 33,000—Auare fee in size. Also, with the proposed .subdivision the properk< line parallel to. Hillside Road would become the f'r�nt lot l n'e for the existing dwelling according to the definitimi of "corner front lot line"' in the Developt%,nt Coti t(SS+ection 17.02.14G). <> This seetioa, defines at ,corner front TW -'tine as "the tshorter line abutting a street.R The rear lot, line by definition then becomes the northernmost property line parallel to' the front tat line As "ired for the subdivision of residential i property, the Development Coda) (Section 17..08.04(2) specie *fa i that the mf1himum rear yard setback shfll be 30 feet. ' TheI:.. E applicant is regUestin% to' reduce *W required rear yard setback too' nine feet in order to scc2imodate 'the existing dwelling u0t, The—owner of the property currently_ Tes1des in the exi i aeg d�11 ing and to itinue living., -after unit wishes co there five acre parcel is subdivided. The design of the subdi ii'A't took this factor into tonsiiieration. 1r f. the alternatives to granting the vaolance include: demolition of 1-4 str"ture; or 2) relocating the s,tructaire an ` the newly Configured lot to as to conform to the current standards in the Developaft Codl� k $'. Environmental Assessment: Staff has ` completed the r nvi R ec s and : determined that the Variance request`'aill not, have any significant environmental impacts, Alhhw if the Planning Gommmissian cogcurs, issuance of :a Uegati9. Declaration wovild be Appropriate if the project is appeOved. PLANNING CEWiSSION STAFF REPORT Variance 87 -17 - Nordic January 13, 1988 - III. FACTS EU —FINDINGS: Tte DertO pment Code requires that- the ann ng commission make certaih"'findings before the .Variance can be 9rarted. Based on tha following facts, staff believes chat them is sufficient justification to make the necessary findings of approval: 1. At- the time of original approval tW existing single family =" dwslling met the'side and rear yard setbacks of the,.0svelopwnt <<. Code, 2. With the new subdl� sion proposal, it is om, by virtue of the strict, literal inlprp.retmtion of the Development Gone that the existing dwelling unit does not meet Ite a4ni um► required rear yard setback. The planning Commission must make the following`'i`indings based on the information presented, in order to approve the Variancse L. That the strict or literal interpWootica of enforcement of the ;pecifie.d regulation would result in practical- difficulty or unnecessary- physical hardship Jnconsi'stent th the objectives of :the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or,, conditions applicable to the property involved or to the Intendsd u3e of the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the same districts 3. That strict or literalz, interpretation of the specifitid reguUtions would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by Owners of other properties in the save district. a. That the granting of a, variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege ''__inconsistent with the limitation of other properties classified in this saw district. 5. that, the granting of &- .variance will not be detrimental vo the health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to j properties or improvements in the vicinit�+r. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised n The Daily Report II neaspapF� as a public hearing „_ the \property pos and;-' a ices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet o, � the` roject 1 site. V. RECDMIgENDATIIN: Staff recommends that _the Planning Commission T” 41 con uc a pu .$c heaving, o, consider public inp4� and elements of this project,' if, after such consideration, the Cclmmission can support the ra Or etf 'sindings, ' -then adoption' of the „atteshed f 1 Re*glution Of Approval would be appropriate. -75 �� � E C> 711 V f S F A G R 0 V� S F R f E 7 T- ri tL 3 '74 _ 1 � -t - NMTH CMY CF r P�- I iV EXHIBIT` -q/ , ALE- � .: 4 �i i J I 1 i 1 �� 1 ��.� y.�6p r � �l 4"'A ! � } 13' _ /• EXISt. HOUSE Yet II IN j 1 fJ e TO I!f' !Ij rl LW 12" COMD UMTY TRAIL a(I� t fn I BAN ( } j� sa i` tdEOtCATP 1°flR c: E Ell ►�r1R403E3 u � !` LIJ I IS' LOCAL EOUCSTRIAAI j _ TRAIL. ! DRAINAGE (► ®64 - _ EXIST. 1 N01,13E 70 BE RE QVEO i` NOM SIT OF j[///} r, t1 KA `�y,��,��"�yM+����;'�;J��G' 1107 l` ��� FLi'ii'!ONI SIG � i� i lJl.Y , r� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING .f- N"ISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 87 -17 TO �ILOW RFOUCTI(ek OF THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TC 9 FEET 10CATE4 AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD -J HERMOSA IN `fHE VERY LOW RESIOEkTIAL DISTRICT - APN: 26 10140 A. Recitals. (i) Nordic Developaoen"� s filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 87 -17 as describod',ire the . title' of this -,,Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance erp�est is rafi -tired to as *the applications. (ii) On January 13, 19&x, the Planping Commission of the City -:of Rancho Cucamonga conducted ^a duty notfced put�ic nearing �n the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (II) All legal prerequisites to they �d'option of this Resolution - { have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is heraby found,: determined and resolved by the Planning. mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as' follows. 1,' This Commission 'hereby specifically finds that al1v of the facts set forth in the Recitals,, Part A, of this Resolution lire true and correct. 2. Based upon sub"antial evidence presented to this Cd miission during the above - referenced public hearingrl on January 13 1988, including written and oral "staff 'reports, together with public testimony, I nis Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a3 The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Hermosa and Hillside with a street frontage of 630 -feet along Hillside Road and 280 feet along Hermosa Street and is prase7tly improved with 3 single family dwellings and chicken coops; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site designated for residential uses and developed with one single family dwelling;, the property to the sou *;h of that site is designated for residential 'uses and \-J is developed with a chicken randh, the property to the east is designated for residential uses and is developed with one single family dwelling and chicken coops, and the property to the west is designated.for residential usos and is developed with one single family dwelling; and �f •.. Dt WYTl�,./�Ai6R °CCf[.Ili[_.CiCCA�:F�{F .iXt ;' Variance 87r;17 - Nordic January 13)r 1 "G�:. _ page (c) A the time off' approval for construction of the existing dwelling it met all the mfni:?requirements for rear and side yard setbuw -U. At tE is times the property line parallel to Hermosa Avenue "i"s considered the rout lot nine, while the property line parallel to Hillside Road was considered the side lot line.. Wit!- the proposed subdivision the property line parallel to Hillside Road w%e dkbecome the front lot line for the elling according to the definition 'of �g-M front line" in the Develop�ent Code (Sect „on 17.02.140). it is only due, to the strict int�erpre`,ation of the &finitfon of front l�t line "that the rear ietback (nine fe�)tj becomes deficient.. 1 c 3. Based upon to substantial evidence presented to this Com6lsgion during the above - referees!. d public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, th {s Co rlssion fierclry finds aEtd I concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation end' � e %fieicewit of the specified regulation kould result in practical ,difficulty or unnecessary, physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives o7 the ” Deve►oppent Codo:� 1' _ U (b) That *,.here are er2ceptional or extraordinary c1rcumstances or conditions applfcahle to the property involved or to the intended use of the € {property that do not apply generally to otil -rp properties in the same district. - (c) Triat strict or literal nterpretatiorr,. and enforcement of the specified regulation w-ald i deprixp the applicant; of privilf , es enjoyed_hilthe owns ;;of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting or the variance will not const±tute a grant Of special privilege inconsistent with'ths limitations on other properties classified in the s' district. (e) That the granting„ o� the Variance will not- be detrimentO to the vubl`. z, Ilealth, safety, or welfare, or rarteri ll ,1njuri.ous to properties or improvements i — vicinity. 4. Based upon the findfi.Ls and conclusions set forth in paragraph Is 2 and 3 above, this CaWssion hereby approved the application subject to each and every condition set forth below.., �a? All applicable conditions of Tentative Tract 13.'B21 shall - apply • ; 5. the Deputy Secretary to this COMis`sion shall / certify ts) the adoption of this Resolution. P PLANNIUS -COMISSION RESPLUTION NO. January tS,; Ma \�- - s Page 3 1 f, APPROVED. AND ADOPTED TliiS 3TN DAY iE J Y. iSSB'. _ PLANNING CIOWISSIW30F THE CITY OF RANCHO Ca*kA d (; 3Y, arry Ti r1c e , ; Ban Brad 94115F. pu y WG ra' T, brad Bullcr, 'Deputy ,Secretary of tie eta -,ing ission bf-, the Ft+ty oil % .Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify Resalution was duly A ._' equl grly introdwed, "passed, -and sdoptee by #ha, Plaming Cowassio" of tit City I►f Rancho Cucwnga, at a regular **-*tin g of tha Planning Comission held' on 130 day, car ",January, 1W!, by the fbil ingry ot to -wit'. I' AYES: Co"ISSIOms: NQESa �1 COWiSSIONERS' i�4 f `ABSE* COW,1S 1MERSa" - is r C — . -.:__ __ _ ___._.- _____ Tti1S1- .11LL4 ♦- S7.TTJh t1TTXa -x _sa .air ry!�}{? h} ' 7txS�, TiV��tJyrV '.t".:}i[LilS�I6TT� —�� "'— "�:�C'•7C7t� ;`, 1T, 1Z _ DATE: Jandary 13, 1 � 1977 TO: ' hairwan and i era of the Planning Commission PROM: Brad Buller, City lannor DT: Greg Gage, Assistanf­ Anrter 41BJECT, ENVININE AL ASSESSt iiT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT V-42 tiY�"= ne devevopment of are e. s zlon or zu, sure feet on 2,27 acrex of land in the General Indnst- al District (Stkirea 10) locates- at 5 thirisoutheast corner of ath Street tvac.i,�ted; and Cleveland Ave we AP9 209-27Z-02. .. Related Files., ISPA 87 -04: St"at Vacation go. 069. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: � ' (, A. Action R_equtW: Approval of CondfOonal Use Permit 87� and issuance oar a Negaiiv!Jeciaratfon« 1 B. ,Surrounding Land Use and Zoning : Worm . a roar ; reh E"_ /industrial, Minimum { Impact Heavy Industrial Sul, 1 South b Yacant�,- General Indus: dial 10j East Vacarro; General indps_ a1 (Subarea 1O) West - Oflict! Suil&"ng /Vacanit,,general Industrial (Subarea C. General Plan Deii naiffons: ro ec' 'f%'�"Itenerd n: strial Ad Served North - Heavy Industrial South,, - General Industrial East - General industrial - Rail Served West - General Industrial - Rail Served lI D. Site Charac,eri The project site is presently a part( --f ` a`"farge v'i'r �yar "'w�fzh extends to 1�t4 east and s6vth. project is bL`r-ded on the north by 8th Street (vacated) and the Santa Fe Railroad 1 ine, and on the west by the rema r- i,ng half '--df Clevela ,Avenue, Which is`now being vacated, r I T." 0 - f. PLANNING COMMISSIQ►!,&111FF REPORT .- COMW4099 - -- January 13, 1985 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: { ' Number of Nomber of Type Squ¢re ParkintR, spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratite Re red Provided Substation 28,800 _ 2 II. ANALYSIS; A. General:, The intent of the proposal is to--Drovide electrtW "se' rvice for the General Dynamics fUilt -is south of the substation site. No structyres art proposed for the project, although the facil`ty wi1T be enclosed with a masonry wall eight t8} feet in . height' Development of t.-te propert tes surrounding the prtject site is exrsecte,] to ` begin within � e next year, when General _ ti -Dynamics coi�tle.�s its master plan , rr the area. Access and circulation iWr Mdmkiats for the € , a south and east of the proiect site will occur with developmv�tt, -, and further dedicatio:is for streets may be required at�ai_ tine. Though normally required for review, no conceptual landscape `" l plan was submitted for the facility, as General Dynamics h -Nd Intended to provide all landscaping with future developments adjacen`'�to the substation._ A condition has been included in the attached Resolution which --equines that a detailed landscape and irrigaticn plan be submitted for review prier t issuance of building permits. 112ilarly, a condition requ rA 1, , detailed plans-for all utility 'equipment witKA, the enclosure has been included, which also provides for revies:`by the Design Review Caiaittee prior to issuance of building permits. In addition to riling m application for a Conditional lls� Permit, General Dynamics has tiled an' industrial Area Spe<;iflc Plan Amendment -37 -041 and a Street Vacation Request (No, 069). 1P.9se applications are intendeif to coKplete the vacation of Cleveland Avenue north of 7th Street, which was begun ,3n,, 1981 %ton t)`e western half oti;,the street was vacated. B. Design I Review .Committee: --'she Committee (Chitiea, Krouiil) rev ewe a el ppro etc on ecPmber I 19A�� and da- ,curssed the issues of iandscap g around the prc�osa.� substation, and design of the ma sony wall which would encldse the facility, Although General, Dynamics requested that iandi, aping around the > facility be provided with futi'4evelopment surrounding the, r ' substation, the , the Z*ftitt� r i r mine# that planting sho0d occur Project. 9 y,? 'ttee recommended approval of the Facility sub; ^ct to the following conditions: �! c. a C" PLAn Page 3 a. JJ VXX Z. ih four: sides of tha proposed block wall �rzosure should be provided treatment to,creata", 0 additiobal interest and break ups long exppaa4�rses of wall < the � enclosure wall sdoal d be intermittcntly ("Cesstd three (3) feet or more in depth so thafi a ic'3_level planter could oe added. :foot ,andsotpe strip Jhould be, provided otr -,tha hors',, east od weft sides of the ansnee that, ipwt in excess of V I � feet in eight w i7 bt effi6tivJ14 scrzenel. and to soften the ae_'hetfc impact of. the *1 and ec ripaAent *1th1p. andscaping should`incl spowen -size tr.�s, vergroon tr!ts, shrt� ur.4glating maupding, gy, .�ndcover,, A* ice Te hri a `review I Femi, tee: The Uchni6al' Review Committee, rev;'ewod 'Me pro . a zS meeting or wamber 15, 1907.. At �3hat times the iss of required landscaping was discussed. ,• 'The ISp requires d nimum of 12 parcent of the net s� a area oust be devot*4 to l� escaping. Since' the .project sites part o. a 37.3 f r'e � pa ei, it was metered ed that tardsc3p�e quirmnts Would � sas'edl4o� *ti sin i the project site 42, 27. B "s) &S oppos to tt�. enti re , te: i; siace only a sialy-- oetion of the p�C perty i ta�7he 441oped. The 10 foot landscape strip recoaaatnckd by the USIS Review, C eittet would equate to 7 6 percent landsca, � y , , ,',"ha " rema K -erg 4.5 percent landscaping "would be req A at othe time of � development of the surrounding T ��_Pendin,�- ;cowletion of Its master pla fsr the area. se„� D requ �ested that Ian dscaping for the acfility" inside t f velop kt .�f surrounding properties.' O. Cnvironmcatal Assessment: tfpan review- Of Parr I of the Initial ; 4=1 upon Cowletion of Part 0 of the "naironmental Chedxli$*�-, Ataff has f I nd no slgnific t e&j, ro *s�,tal impacts related fo`the dev i nt "6f this prefect, III. FATS FOR' Fig , This prtaeect is censl`rtent kith the In4strial Area p'4zc'il3t. an and the - General Plan,---,' The pr ojoti t wa'l not be detrimental tb adjacent properties"' or caute significant environmental ,ivpact. , In addition, the prtposal,- tether w1th *-he recomssended -conditions, will 'comply with the = lcrdus,�zial �irea Uer4fic Plan and all applicable City st %wards. �. V_ ryN, �p��I }� i� �+T 1PCF jay, T danEiar,� �G� �i99� CD X RMWIEN iATIM, It is ra QWmwpd the a fxsiaif, n C +n All y��hs►ti Ai.. lat to iiii1rt �. 'can {idar 4�C �.�i4�7 carasi -on ion,; 6 C t;,sion sup,"rt' r '�,3yest„ adttpt #�tt a� Res full t d, Sr city anger , t> ' zt ^r Attack"nts: Wibit " � Vicinft ltatp i� A; e,�,,,}y,,p e S _ gyp .y�.° e,c i i x� s T Oaf (gip &a4, 3 J .80t (0 Approval C,� _ r G' - ����` Ai i CI' is ITEM; \+�i HOP4e ' A - aC - PLAHAYRA °L t.+ a sir MI. srs• Aa�. It'` �'•�� —'^ tie -�,G- ���-•'-----. Jj..-•`= �u-- rl- _,�`�_.ir-- 'i- .-- ...« --,- spl,'�.'�''•. -e.-� tit-- -��'^- - /Co8� iii✓ „,T. t— ,t,�'�'�,��, owp i � 9 _-Civ4le,, I Li _ cniOF j i !i r 1 ( � At tl " K r' {5�'rv- ` M,0541.,# C :L 1 i. I MAN EX „ 1 r; 8s9l,.Ui'IN NO•f A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA NING COMMISSION, , APPROVING CONDITIONAL ilSE PERMIT NO. 87-42 FOR 'AN ELESTRYCAL SU09ATMN LOCATO AT 1HE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF M STREET (WATED) AA0 CLEVELAND AVENUE / 4 MEAEMAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT XPH 43� -€f8 /! s j A. ll (1) General Dynamics Arai filed an piicatii�h for the issuanao "of the Conditional Use l�erari 610, P 87 -42 as described in the tlt'.e of this Resolution.; Hereinafter fu this Msolution, the Subject, Conditions) Use Permit request is referred to as "thr-•'appticationk. v 'tln the 13th >of doeluary, 2988, the planning 00"Isston of the City of Ranoft C >lgaixpn a con*& -ted a duly noticed; f Olic hearing on -the application aad coll,luded sake hearing on that date. (iii) All legal' prerequisites to .the adoption of this Resolution have occurr#3. B. Resolution. l M NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determit�ed and resolved by the ; Planning Cowilssi,on of the City of Rambo Cucar4onga as fall�ws: I: This Comi`ssion hereby spetifically finds tillt all of the facts set forth in the Jecitels, Part 4 of this,ResoiutIon are trut and corr%t. n; � 2. Based upo�r substantial evidence presented i.-a i;hi3 «amfs�an during the abovsw referenced public tea irtg on January 33, 2588, including written and oral 1 staff. reports,, tog er with public .tebtimony, this = Comission hereby spedificaily finds as follows.­ ! (a) the' application applies to prOpt -,ty located at the L southwest corner of 8th Street;ivacated; and Cleveland Avenue with a,. street frontage of 240 feet and Act depth of 2166 feet and,i,s presently uacant;'and (b) The property to the north of the sljbjs�t ,siia,• #s the AT. r fr S.F. rtailroad right -of -way, the. pro pert to the 'l�uth of tlwat sits -(3s the vacant, property �� the seal is" developed with �� o3, ice use, _ 3. Based upon the substantial evidance presented to this Cowlision :referenced during the above. public hearing and upon the specific " � nos of facts set forth in I 2 paragr.iph and abova, tl#is Caaarission hbreb ds and conclud4� as f. ?llows; � c' (a) That the proposed use is in accoed with the C�*,neral plan, jf" `�,*Ne, objectives the tiexelopment Cede, end the purposes of the diStrist,.1n which a the site is located. ") r, 6 PLANNING C+a'_g ISSION RE $DLUTIOA ND. C9OyNOTTlaNki - USSEE PERMIt 87 -42 - GENERAL DTNMI Page 2 (lsi, Qat, the proposed use, together `with" the Conditions applicable 'ther1to, will not be c� detrimentO to the public health, safety, or "welfare, or rr<aterially injurious to propeftjgs _ or iarprov As i4 :tbe vicinity= y (e) 'drat the Ooposed use complies with =* of the np €li =able prauisions of the Development ;ode ", ' 4. This t; fission hereby firtdt and certifies that the "project,.has been reviewed and con4ldeved in co�gr Gt lian with 'the, liforhia Enviromental Quality Act of 1970 and,, further .'- this Commission hereby, issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon ihwa 1'rn ;n^� j con -'e, unions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this C+ issiotr r;� fi1,5y approves the appticot#on stbject tl �_ each and every., condition sat ,fortk'f be';�w "aid irk ,;the c1ttached Standard Conditions attached h0eto °and incorpora=*ld''narain liy'this kferende. t` Plahniho r ?; -4sion; (1) InteWttet•,recesse5 shal'f' be provided :ta the block wall,'--to be at Uast it wee (3) feet in � 1 depth. Revised plans reflsct,4 such,- �cesses shall be submitted fa: the mt�ew..and �p.proYal of the, City Planh+mr p��i gr�- is�ao of 1 building permits. t� ,fit Un- (10) foot - lshdscipt strip shrill be provided ry h0 eiorttI ee ; -f and West sides of _ the eD re. Detaai lA 'cape attrd irri a�t� --plans shall ,b Saabnrii� to the P1anrgri!'4 Division for review �r�rl ; r-?lral prior ; to It e isssranne of building Permits. ,an ca #pg shall include specs` a -size treis, 1 everVten trees, shr "bs, undulating m&und11!;, groundcover} etc. j C ? Detailed plans far 111 ut�ill equipment.'to (ibe installed Within the. endlusure lball be submitted for review acid approval by the Design ; R- !Vide ,CoqAittee prior .tl iss*4aftc of' building 7 Wt5. (1) 'the vacation of Glevel d Avenue fros, the bro, side of ?th,; Street to epro ec, {� � boundary shaft, be to buildir' t Permit issuance l si'Sfa'i�: CONDITIONX USr PERMIT 87Z;2 > GENERAL. DYNAMICS January 13L, 98 Page i21 An offar of dedication. (aq feet in width) f�', the north half o: 7th Strad' along tfie pF° e� t frontage shall be required and shall, 41igit �dth the eni.sting, effir of dedication of 1th Street. (31' the existing overhead utdlities ,(communications line for the 66 G electrical and the %rallrcad camunicatil m .11ne) shoal. , be undergeo ended along tdia rr entire north project umcndaryy. ektendinB to "the first nal'e dfFIvie *iesfF and east ­7 Ute pro$ect; boundary upon Urthe.. devel6P[ent car subd;visiort of this pareej (APR: ;�U*9-272 -02) A surety acceptable to the City £ €Weer and City Axtgrney to,gearaptee the future uqdet�gropnding shaai be coglett.d prior ta,,the issuance of .building- parmi#. ALA. the time of co3pletion of the undergroundina,:; the daveleper may request a reimbburseme�rt agre nt to Lover one -half "Oe City :;,Optod cast for under rounding freR futuKe de�elap rt (red6r*,ld�ent) as it occurs on the m;- sfdR of the A.T. d S.F. Rail road. f % 6. The Deputy 'S+r c -exary to this Ccm� isSion shall certiflr to the adoption of this Resolution. k APPROVED AMD ADOPTED THIS 13tH DAY OF dAMM, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CW4M0N0A f BY: G airy TT-Mmtlel, wimmun I ATTEST: MARI Oil 9er acre ary ff I, Brad Buller, Deputy .Secretary of t4;e Plslnninr t au „ion of the P.1t of Ranct.o Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing ResolutiGn Was...dUl,­, and ragulariv introduced, passed, and adogttd by the Plannitig Cr�izsfoci o. ..the City of Rancho Cucamorga, at a regularW*tins of the ,olanninq Cm m%rAon held, on the 10th day of asnuary, 1948„ by the fC.Mowing vote =tR -wit+. s- AYES;_ CWISSIONERS: ` NOES MBSBt+ T: cowl p�;tr�lERS 0 I {, - w _ b l • Ywys M N� ya ` 6yY ,ICY W '.t Y E O '4W NSit .' V�.aMO n ;, So wuM °.ig3S►'�g ffiL" 114.5; ` � 2 jr 'W"Nal V-69 W3 ra « .taaay�r�4`( %��w �.r� tlh�yVµ� s a � � y' '. d •- hit hi 92— Zj Mesa ��� a �. 1� :_ '- 8• iN i�..Y � 1a M Q .. '.Tr. fax cl q 4 Iq n .t! s_. 011s N HE ISE 111Z r. fN N all 3 t, It « e ills CA «� N6 K N DDy N Q fry p J ¢ pnN uY W�4•iN �ng M Y V.Pw i �� $ �. Z.+ r'.i +fin. ��- . �. x'� I- - ii ate+ .` �N 9 4:00 �g�r ^gr LEM _imN,� �_•��� o ` ajSiY ►V AS I _ Yn _ u 116 w��� ~^ ��iy��u CI F�j awl w, (t�� '�. '?;�%. 6�, •AN Ci�Yr � ~. NY s wi� f.OY ��a t'l`'•• ��. �f�� N.Nq ! � w µ a! qli,! N j «ego.. ary�N sw�,+g� n+_' A. 1s, ion. �sw t y� y }� lE f Mi�Q M »Q� 3i.'y .,y �` Yom. N F�, N"9 It ep ��yy 1 fF gg �y � � +iii 1t•� �/y Whii 4— V • ° Y 1� ° y IL 1 A Iw IL �...{TQ�O.�Itft4 i'•YVjj'� . =ME M Lai a � ew�� rw tl�ypy4N -veal 5 N. - ^I ` °` °'wart Qa,y pi i'I. e. sQ +1^ ww.{oNi+o^. =iiSEw ypMX,* �: �; yam,' ' jx -$, ++ 3 � . sy au m �r�TfT�.q�yO.j. aFQ�QY �wa ��i p���� �i.i ye a� q1�L tV `r Y4y1 f M��f{y YT 4Ybi �MPiLMt M 3 hl I M y In Sir ' i r N e. s . 9 y. N ` $ y �*y` y,t,u�`� � At Iq f ul ste -sit r rl� ae gM i ✓ M _ �Y .+� � iiYe N. NM °y rt i. Yrr.rob 44M 9 �ggai xx� s�7i+ �3 ,wp! NxGee. +Zn „C +C.''�:i� 6i iCee _ t _ A• r 1g §fug' v °V rt fit 2v POP lb x ail TZ iv jI W Ip Y PHI 119A. +v��. �f ���3333 ���'��wii�..wR -ii � 8� F:�iw•� 'L�Z��t� ��uw�a:��' N �� ��'� o. � C- Hit e g `it N � 141 v EI f,gat' a �.x� y`,`''w Nip n \1 ` RN 1 4e ►. , N+ � !j 1�.{7r 3 3 h t1 " 7�, i 1 N CC � a N �, N.. u $ LU yQ1 a N MA M �,..a 1— Ill 4Y M � Yd t.'. � ii n i1r � . c u r tlA a Ou L r V cgs '(Ny'.'� �Y �y i- "a'3R/irTi ..N° Oy r }t r`N �J� �!✓•' i "IY Y M AiTYw� fib I a 31 it Ire 111 c i M Lt�.i : 5r a WTI 011,111, Z-3 Al 'beas el tlpY .3 M ~ pptc y� a�. iTV � �� • : A ge TY��' R3 Si 11 oil Nt. 4� 99 {�. i �^ja`� ,Yt i, y�+'�• �i q ST(rrL� .4 Its J .+ r i. nr. w Y �G$ x 1161, �v Ai. A� N � WJ+'1 WVV y7i` K .! <il�L j1 _ 0— ! !i Zo lf, s q' Mf M Y` �- 1s s � N Lk 3 tp Elk f Mrs e i cam• i$. a. y MO r.a'�� •r� �"�.�. �� i.� iu��e! ��►�} *r fir. r` i+ Y�, �� •W « � eel �� � Y�;� °. y/ �. A T ry` .8 M amo � 4 g -13 ry�8 O .R. V. ~ 1l �'y�. %�'- C. SCR 7'i 4w ui, r i rill {� all F 3 � w ^ H a If > k �i .,. xl't ndxM MK _ a _ _ y� QWY�4 vx -i W P Ral Aft t 1__, � ii y r:2 ��.,, yr ._. ♦ •�..w y1 � aad8 yT� � S lip gxr 1. , 0701 -02 o 1-13 -88 "PC Agenda o 3 --of 4 --- =-=- -- CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,STAFF REPORT iz ca , 'DATE. Jan;ary x ;x,1988 1977 T0: Chairman and IKem6ors of the Planning Commistion FROM., Br ��iiiier, Gity Planner BY dreg Gage. °Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 1-4v RQ NTAL. ASSESSMENT AND INDUSAIAL SPECIFIC PLN t1 7"i#7»tl n n o e case rcu a on an or a 11;istri,sa"l Area Specific Plan (Subar *a 101 to eliminate Cleveland Avenue, north of 7th Street - AM: 209*279 -02 Related Files; CanditioW� -Use Permit 87.42; Vacation Request 069 - 1 I. BAvKra OUND; Ire filing the above referenced Conditional' Vse Permit ,appficca on, the applicant requested approval ` vacate the (j remaining 30 foot right -of -way, for Cleveland A in%k, >,, uzorth of 7th Street (see Exhibit B"). In reviewing the ra"r{us =�, it was noted that =the western half of Cleveland Avenue h s�. ►*�� +D� previously vacnted `in 1981.'" Since the Industrial Specify < pla,, 114signates Cleveland Avenue as, a secondary arterial, it is s^. y ;r+ to amend the CirculatiOr Plan for the Industrial Area ".P ttt c Plan, by deleting Cleveland Avenue (norto of 7th Street) h;reu ,allowing the street vacation-.process to W co*pleted. - �� II. ANALYSIS; T1,e proposed amendeant would not restrict access or adverse affect cirtzulation for parcels in the vicinity. Properties west of Cleveland Avenue are provided access from Toronto Avenue, a cal- de-sec street (see Exhibit-"e). Proparties ^� east of Cleveland Avenue ire owned by the, applicant, and a ace�. � and circulation improvement3 will be tmaster `planned and comple#4id as the parcels are developed. Additional dedications for mature streets may be required at the time of such development, The City t Traffic Engineer :gas reviewed the request, and determined that the ` Proposed vacation would be appropriate -"No attached memorandum dated December 10, 1987). It approved, tNs apandment and related street vacation would ai'low the ao'klicant to pro;.eed with the development 'Jf $ utility substat�j;1 immediately east of the Cleveland: right -of "'war. ' 7 ITEM P ` UT jr�W .. . �EII. iSP E7 p if3C�� j " "ary is, 1"S sc Page Z TI 1 J RE:�tdt!lt�i0b} It$ rsco �ed that t�'e Pihitninq ssfon cans a %Ii4; Input and issues d, to y es . re7a e k after such cons�idera?i�n, , „the. Commissj,a” cam. $upga A' sr rdcawwser WOOn ccf ap roVall y adDolon of that, attached Resgt f 4} ° would s : ag�proprtate. Resp` �rl'l rl , v G ity P a�n r attach eats: Letters from Apgriicant - 4Zn 'C � " raff tr r lfrt ;ngineer -, Exhibit' A viefu Ty ftp :. Exhibit � � a`Str t vacAlon plan p RastA3 tior, ii ding, Approsai of IndUSirlal Area ' Specific ,Pl`n Mendmott 57 -04 an rtmeet Vacation Regties 069 �I Aft V 4 r, ;S _ , 1� ' KrMS ah0++4t! • ►r vans ♦ � '' �� �j $CltY/H1aQ isos.' di6lNy"+`I:rIFtItS�' _ '' 9 f'1Nrrin3M�111t 3KIke,' �,, , ,SaYt Ciai,,vi`�'�altfOmfa 9131 -242 � �-`y (619) AN&O226 1 Y tf#f��9yyt �}aStrRs�uq53ter TML LA. 40IN2 KSA ur f' ( /f Eng;�lc�aricxl Csrclalrt�:arrlt - r '.� n+ Rsj i 807 Rs )WV Qxw4rqi. CA '917-30 00N, strihw4n- r 5�,j91�t, �,'iM�11YiQ19 �!� C►aeSrdt'�t� �(� t rleraFF ffyllarrii 'stun tuft"" ice, vac-atiaet Jot CImome� r1 ttll3P�t, 1 +gtt; f rf a 7d tt{ '/fit lil pll, �'orasic 3a�ltlir i�t i98ii iroso R3g6;t°� 1'1►� 'ty soof,bt Clow, iQm X� o2G<, s C t[pF t rot t1� `V�t Cara►raP iY+,mmi t1wF"ia of�tetl by tt* vs i�iior, ThIsl. Ty is Ewa O'W'w Ct Torontca Avwv,*. btith gighih 34ng*+ Y tl1�: ?fib r i c"tiClt of C16tV ia�k! Av>ps�caft 5sry atz! art t is 4Rot _Slid €e`abi fgfr 9t 4,' at ervaibpol l at ?+h )1 adjacent oroftrtV4 A+tactwW lr thoi ooriaetl ff* Of .$125'0 P,�f' � t9� obi L. tiR`aA- *, Far idont /Pr!r4i* Fi Civi i "inW == 120 ��_� 1. � ., •. RkCiIVED w .0 . gwtw, a CIS - - - i' ANN NG SC A 116OLIMON QP THE f.*.Ho CMAi OWA - f!l,ARMIK COWIiSIOM R£ M APPIOVAL OF INOUSTRlAL AM SPECIFIC _PLAN (113.Pi) Ali JMMT 87 -04 X ELINIMAlt CLEVEL WO AVENUE NORTH W 7TH STREET A. Recitals. (f3 ciereral tiynaatics has filed am- application for an lttdustria? Specific Flan 4 nditAt W. 07 -04, as desckbed in the tttlt of this i3OSOution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the Subject Specific Plan Amndment request is referred to as "the applic tittn", M) On January i99$, the P1annips QCs fission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a caly noticed I blic hxarirg on th+e Applicatio:t and concluded said hearing on that date. { iitia All legal Preerequf�s�es to the have occurred. adoptfon of this Resolution B. Resolution. 10. "THEREFORE, 4t is hereby found, `de£trsined and resolved by the ` Planning Coaraissicq of tin City of Rancho Cu aaltonr as follows: L This Cowission hereby scrtcificAlly finds that all of the sects ' set forth in the Recitals, part A, of thises+�lutior are true and correct j Z'L Rased upon substantial evidence presented ta: this Co"Ission during the above =- referenced public hearing on January 13 29$6., including Writtod and oral 'staff reports, together with public test1w, "Iy, this Comission hereby* specifically` finds as follows; (a) The applicatioa applies to property located at` the southeast corner of 8th Street (vacated) and Cleveland Axenu+e, and it Presently vacant, and ra (b) The property to, the north of tkil Subject site is developed wrth industrial uses, and is FrovQed access fr(O Vincont Avenue, and (c3 The property tOL the south viii east Of the site is currently vacant„ is wed by applicant, and will have access and circulation patterns master planned,and.., camp! eted as develapmertt occurs;. and (dl The property to the west is partially developed with a manufacturing uses which is provided access from Toronto Avenue, a cut- de wsac street. l LANNIIMA OWtSaSI ESOLUTION PLO. _ a 6E GENERAL DYNAMICS .. { January 13x19¢8..._ Page 2 _ 3. eased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above = referenced pull c hearing and upon the specific,, findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and Z 96W/e, this Commission hereby finds and concludes a: follows: . tai That the subject p=roperty is suitable for, the >l apses permitted within the district in terms .,ofi access, size, and compatibility with existl l band uses In the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed ; ific Plan Amendment would" not have significant Impact on the environeent nor the surrounding properties, and (c) That the proposed Specific Plan Arendment °Is In conformance with the General Play►,. 4. This Commission hereby finds disc) certifies tot the proj4-*- -ltas been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Califbrni -4 Envirzso tal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recftinenda W,,`' -.e of a Negative Declaration. 5..- eased upon the findings 'and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, Z and 3 above, this Commission hereby c4soives as foila!,x<, [. (ai) That pursuant to Section 0850 to�65355 of the Califo }-niu Government Cod that thu Planning Commissio>t of 'the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby f recommends appro,ai or* the 13th day of January, 1988, Industrial Area` Specific Alan Akendwnt No. 83 -04. i E (b) The Plarr6ing Commission hereby rtcog ads that .'the city ;ouxil 'approve and autos itAdstrial rza A Specific Plan Amendment No. 87-04 1 <<, (c) That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related waterial hereby adopted by the = Planning Cowissioyr shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shai'i certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ISTH DAY OF JANUARY, 9988. PLANN Ma COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BX =; Larry T. McNief, ChaliWn .=.-°.-�.... ., i.)' ATTEST. . M-4 M eMrM — OPLANNING COWISSIOK RESOLUTION NO. --- _-- -_. -__ � L "I ISPA 87-04 - GENERAL DYNMICS r page S J J o I rq, Brad Suller, ut$ S ".Wary of the Planning a 31 1 of the City of ��1 Rancho Cucmnga,, do heroby carti,fy that the foregoing Resolut$orr was-, duly and regulcrly introduced, passod* OM aftoted by the Planning Cckwiissi%) of the C= Cit1+ Of Raacho Cucawaaga,; ait a regular creating of the, Planning :ortssion held !� on the � d,-ky of._�anuAry, ;M, by the follrvinth "to-ta -wit: AYES: t?mxSSIONAS: V NOES: C ISSIOI0S :' ... _ ASSENT: COFIROSIONERS :, _ � {1 _ c n v -- CITY OF RANCH€? CUCAMON'GK ISTAFF REPORT la _-A DATE, January 23, 1988 1977 TO: Chairman and -''ftembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor SUBJECT-. EHYIRD* E*TRL ASSCSSMENT AWj DEVELOi?M T CODE AMEmxNT - AMIMMM .. An amenment to v 3t %`oF`E�e"f ve upeter+ Code pertainidg to parking tit and sidewalk sales. - I. AWLYSIS: Staff has previously req+trsted dipection from tits Planning Commission to clarify the intent of parking lot sale regulations. Specifically, the use of individual business locations istorefronts3 a$ the basis of permit approvsl and when ,? meeting time limits oe 'Other criteria. LTh& planning Commission 0 determined that' the existing code was vague and could allow _ activiV which did nct sleet the intent of regulation. In order to clarify appropriate limitAtionsVfor this type of sales activity, the Planning Commitsion directed staff to` prepare! g Development Code Amendment.. Spec ific recommendations include& -� I. The linking ofApprovalsto: business locations) 2. Encuuragirs the involvement of multiple businesses within shopping `enters to .participate° in sales events by requiring one permitted sale per year t5 involve at least 50% of the businesses within a shopping center. 3. Reducing the minimum time perftd_, between sales from 90 days to 30 days; and 4. Limiting the total time for an approved sales event to three consecutive dAys. The following language is suggested to clarify the intent of "nulation for parking lot and sidewalk sales; including the Planning CoMission recommendations. IV kL0 obi ITEIA PLARN Rra CO MtSSIn STAFF F EP � REPORT sm� . Environmental A 'se ent r4 OCA' _ January 13, IWF� Page ., Section 17;10.03l3g Z. F_arkiog Lot and 1 ewalk'Sales. Parking lot and sidewalk 0 "` ,, sales may-- 4Z t-4- n" ccmeaer,,ciallretaii -areas of tip`itilt� inrludtrtg re aiilw5 le businesses located witOn frdus4rf a7 a x�a 's, in 4onnation with current en- s business' , s a's t to the approval' of a Tam pordry Use Permit as prOVidea in Section 17.04,070 and the ` folio i q cri Aria. a. Each sate is .limited to ' a maxima of three?} 'onsecutive days; _ :spa No sale for singEpie business tar any other businesses bated on the sat lot pr parcel, or within shopping center, shall be p$raitted within thirty g) days -e another sale; { c. A maxima ofL three Sir sales shall be .p�cittdd for each business during each calendar year; however, one (1) additional �alat Wray be permitted for ar ' business located within a shoppint canter provided that at c ~, least fifty percent (50%) of the businesses cupying the center participate concurrently in such d The applicant €a�r such sale iaust Obtain the written authorization Of the property owner and t provide proof of notifii:ation to all other busir4ssao on tt - samme lot or parcel, or within the so" shoppa-�jg Center, that a parking tot or sidewalk sale will bs conductO, the 16i4ts it will be conducted and Hiatt no other safe within thirty (30) days of such satle,will be perrr,4,k aer k? e� The �,im U,% bat sold shall be of the same type that ar,71 regularly displayed and sold at the business location; �„ f.. The activiV shah not present a to f J ,hazard pedestrians or encroach on a rvquiv^ed building exit-, g. Safe vehicle ingress and egress shall be provided at all hates; and h. Adequate parking shall be provided a,nd aaaintained during the course of the activity for both the business of UK. applicant and all other businesses on sawe lot or pRgcel or`-within the .same shopping the 11i COMdI5Si11 ST`S r �, fnvironnre 1968 daauaary 13+ Page leted Part ant Steff ha% tha the PrO� � i Vts• Cr F, RJR`' == 'ca�1 (` enviro ` EhVIRQlhT�. ec� {itaat �ersa�tive Declaration. in 1I, nvr1een` crew Winds iss,tia a pulslicha n+aen Would not staff r adyeCtised as Inc. tihes^Efare, was c.rrespa t ite date no CORRE O1iDE1tC'E • newspaper to i ssi an _ Iii, a art ?1anr�in9 ;, ounc e +s 1feccraeedndi a9 a e of i n ileti'$ c CONi -�d Resell tianndaient anc!„ issu 10 7 a.�op � the Proi; 0. E. peclaration• !' fully K l� Res ,•-^ -- - • nl Bra apitier � .. City + 1o.03 %? �\ nt Dade section 1 ?. ; AML Develap� gttacYnts� gsolutionaofprova J : .. GA��1 {aF.l SAN l � Excerpt froNi° the honcho Out *onga Development Cale � motion >ly.10.031 2. pa kfng Lo Air Sk'dwslk Wts. farkirg_ got and side_�lk sales or ,i 11 *a marK-st of operation m_y be ermftted in fi'n! coat rciaj di ttricts subj to U* approval - -, f a tcN�por br�r use permit ,As descriltd is Chapter 17.0.070 and the following criteria. a» The sale say not oxceisd thrnt ° tws, during any, three - month peg! "iod; b. The prospective merchant must obtair, *rttt#n � authorizition of, property owerj \. c» The actIvi tY shall not pretent , ,a hazard to ,. pedestriau or encroach on,* regired building exit; d. Safe vehV. -le inq:ess and egress sha10, be provNeo at all tip;; and _7 e» Adequate parkirra shall be pv -uided an(k Nraintained during the course!, of the actin: ; o . ------ CITY OP►WXCHO CTCi3MONliA ;. i3 R xx - INITIAL STOP -, BNVXRt��`k1R� CHECKLIST APP4I%.'''iai o.yGsF : ,r FZZ IYG b4� R ., ,.'tW MJ;'iix 1 PIZOJECT PRCJp�7; Lt3G.tTION: �iS;cr'•Grnl �' '� .� XJ'�*L...f,%�,..��..,. .,,,.° Ie ENt72ROl tEt:TAa`.. ZiyPACTS i +, r (Explanation of all ,ryea" and '"Msyoft" "xn wes1 sire required an attached sheets). Soils and GeoZo�,. Llils the raraposai :nave `�'�= "YES MAY N0 atigniriaasst resurta an: - x. Unstable 1S.roundc0nd'1ti6ns0r in changes is geologic relationships? „> b. iliaxuptiaetss, sYisplgrc[nitntstnnpaeaScpza or burial of the a. change in topogr phy -or groeni surface s/ _ contour intexvaa�?,Ji dr tie 4"tructidny,' covering ,air AiOdAfiCabt%aat of any unique geologic or phystr.al ieo e. Any p""t1al 1n40494 iN wind . :. - 0r water erosion of Soils, either on pr off site conottan�? f. Changes in otosign siltation, or deposition' ) $. gxpasure of people = property to gesslgi c hararcTs such as carthgvakesR, landslides, ata� elides, grouted failure, or similar haxnr4'. \, h. An increa %c in the rate of 4x-.raetion �ndlar uatt of 4Ay Zineralt tr+exaurca l� n > -rry sic � t�i &�G% ri Fill thx have c proposal signifiitatit ft*u .tt in: +w4 a. Changes in currents, 'or `IE5 MAYBE the csrarse of direction flowing otreamst, rivers, or ephemeral tre�m �h channels? h, changes in ab i. xpt aan M aces, drainage pattazAi' Or the rate anti amount of surfa6. water runoff? �p (' , c• Alterations to the course or flow of,flood Waters? d. Change in the aunt of surfsc r^ e waczr in anp body of wate? 3, Dipcharg�,+ I7gtt^ sue..Gar fitati , °,nr suet+ aFkeratidx of artrface water �� .city?" i`• Alteration of groundwater ch4racteristita? k a= change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through ad#itiong with- ' „+direct or drawa3s, ar thzougir interfare�ice with an �. aquifer? Quantity? h. l The reduction In the amount MV wiCter oiher• wise ava-Ushle for pq;,blic watipr suppliao i. c`cposure -of peo�la ,)r 1'ropert to water �l !ielated hazard sch tisloodittg or seicha`s2 Air results _ i ?: ,A sal sra��v: si$niafcant a. Constant or pet'X4di2 ;fird emi:z:aions from mobile Or Indiracv, H @sue +•.�,- 'f_ Stationary sources' 'n• Deterioration of ambien” air quality and /or . intarfarenaa with the &� ntltent of applicable air quality standards? c. Alterarsun of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or M- pertture? , `�. Flora. Will tFe ro p Prrua haver sign3f3aatst result$ Tn. Y \ Jl \ -` d Gran g_ in the clr$rxcteristics ;,)f apecies, /f' Ifs! < including divers ,. of cant' species of Y eti$tr±Wtinn, ar numbe - � „ _ �dts b• �ad�+ctiorr the Reber' 00 any__uzefgna, l gage 3 r.. IotT.oductiAn of Uv or disruptive speeisa of 1' . plants intA sra ='area? ,. � �• d.. $a$ucti9n .3n „the �;:� ".�atid7, , €fir aR +iaulzttral + -, Fauna; Will the ro osav hAvc ,� p i$ni£rS ant Ya ;ttiita itt: a. Chatigti �ha chaiactatristics o£ species, _ Sndludint diverait , ciistribsttit�a, distribution,/,,, oumbexs of xny,, peciea of �nimalt? J b. aductAon of the nuW6, irs- of goy 00 rare or ent�%ngored species of an Is? / c. Introduction of now or,disrup�5 a species ci.. •. an3anaXs 'into an ,area, or rasuflt ,in a barrier to the mZ$ratiori -or m6YamiC it gir anit-Alaa d. Deterioration of iamiWai wildlife, habitat? of existing fish or C f tfoi ar ation. Dill• 6w propa,gal have s4nif:,cant red ltts ins a. Will f the PrAposal elter tt F 1119cation, Aistr:t- bution, density, dtvea'si� *., as greet.1 rata of the human pog;tlatian a ai7.` area? { ° b. Will the propcsai affect existing housing Cr ' j create a demand for adclitj,oi31 housing? _ _ 6. Socio- Econacte pact', "Will the psaposal have sip gni Calg,rexults SZ. a. Change in local or rejgtanasl aocia- ascoi� is charactatfstiasj, i 'Alluding ecanwmic of commercial divat's ty, tax rata* and property values 9 b. will project coo4ts be e? 41tab .V dt stsihated among project bemexiciaries, 1.e.; tax Payers or ptaject.usus? A 7. Laid Use and Pldnrtzin'' CAnsf1 ar xtloris. Will On prrposal hove sigt:i€Icant results in? „ at. �4 substantial a13ie anon `- of the' Xeset►t or Planned land use of an area? b. A , conflict with any desionations,'objective*., a 3 Policies, or_edok.ted glans of any 64vf_rnmental entities? Impact upon the qulaty or qus�git= of sxitYting. ,:onaum ►tive o" non -conic mptivr W. recrsa4lciasa2 aeartuseef� ...' eatpldsion or r0lafft Of hazardous sub"O',"ea 4n the event of at &aj4. *`3ents d. Ara fua:reasa in the xtumsaar Of �rdivi�ual,s or apacles O,E Vector or'pathenoganic l ®r;;eraisms #k the UPOsure of peoplaa to such 1 ©; ganisms? 7 e: lncrsaa,� in a i.swtng n#�,,se levels? f. Expo snse of plapL3 to Potentially r t gerae noilke lavelss: ` • Thaa creation tx 0. JJQctinnab ;e odtars? °' h• „aainn or, *Z* iR� ISht or glart? Pages 4 $. Tr� ana�l�;•t�si�c�. #Ti$� thk psopasal have s U Y£S b Y1 No significant results; ins o a< 060ration of substantial additional vehicular'= . a *v4Mgnt? b• Ffarot s ex #s:t #ng g ' tragts, or demand for , ees mt >aat corertwct #as3:? s. 21festa OR existin deimaud for 8ar�Psing facilit.ea, or $e► perk#,..' d. Eubits ttial jmpsct : upp4 egi t1on syst¢ms aEt #tag tisnsperta- e< Altaras #oats to' pzRa;aa pa setae of circula- tion, 4wv+�ett, o. �., ox r f PQ*�% agdkor goods? r. �,ZteratloaaGrta>'nt: �'.; \` f' on present and ``patent�al grata a a# r E rfas j3�f, tra3�fi�ic hazards to motor vehicles, �1C�a7� "$t�' tar ��%k�estr #tn &? E . Q tea# Qu`,z�s, RIII the pro?fosal have A I a. A 'd#sturbatnce to th* 111tegrity of #reha►eolagicai, S :lsantolagical� ai?draor h3tar# r resources? ..__.� 10. Heaelth. g3fek�'�and InL`& �ffi6}.Ol"Sr ~�,1 t the proposa — a• creation 01c auy he litI2 hsazara sr patcntiit$ health hazardl ii. Exposure of paople, to .Fatantial` it>aa3 th hazards? a. A rash a;f E YI. Aesthetics, �ful the proposal have siftnificant YES rAB$E{ esuIta in: a. The'okstructi on or doaradItion of any. *conic rlstta or'view? b. The, creation of an site? aestheticaly5z „ off ems ive , < c, 'cbafliet with the 'rjcetive Of designated � or patent?al pacnic corrtdare, Z2. tttilitias and PubYic Sezv#cet. W'ili the proposal haves a s3LSnXXittsnt nsed for: `' rcew siyst"s, or c terAti+ma tho follawi -0g r a. Zlectrih Poor? fie. natural Orr ao� a'"° P $ ct tgaas .�.. E a. Gprmnussieat3o:�s aPs�+ea?a�? d. icer supply? c e. Rastewater facUitieas ?, pia rlood control, 1.!4 uc-t�i4es? f S. Solid s-asto fac$lities? h, fire protection? i. rolice protectioa? i� 3ahoois? k. Parks or othst fecr� Ytorta? faciYities ?, i. tfaiatsnetece of public facilities, 3nr1esd3n' `' toads and t:aod nQr.Iroi facilities? n. Other Rov+eQital ae:vicas? �..., 23. Enter and Saarca Reaurces. WaII hsys s, nifieaast result”" �, the propccsal: �. aE Ui "e of sub,stantia3 or excessive fuel'sr anergy? r t, b. 'Substaatia2 Increase in d sources energy? emand upon aistig .f en r a....' c. An Increase, &.1 � &ze d4mass�� for niv sources of "orgy -. �. .fit Inareesc�e ar Perpetuation of thss consrad�rtfa,n of n4a"rezzaw�s:ale'fOrMS of ertefigy► whgi3 " fsiesiblo, Vlonewable amp cues of suer 4x avail,ablol' ' t l t« ubstaaxtiatj dsplUtan fit any nGnYaenera ?�C�rxe It AM � scare. "ztat-aral � #51tYttY�a? � �j� � t 14. Mandalgox Fludit) 'as n 'Si •3 #ir, ; Tj '°'c a. ikieae :1crac� hsj6l'�5 Pof� ftia CTs degrade the ' ua3,ja 1 h sub #�tianxia lly ey seduce the hi, r.: s xstx ar CA-u*e 4 - -floh or wil #fie Rdw to spasCies, ; r»sn to hslbta self su�restnin Za:v'elts. Cott �"alsta2a �ta *11mUlatt as Plant or *n7tmt�i;� lei ty r iCadua:e th, numbor, ar_ Vastrict the r,%ngae of a rata or ±eastl��at$rer od qal t ot,, ,*a£msi or *lixioate gaxta t lltxt P2+ of tho'sajox uatriods of CA 2ii`arR u histo or P1*e1ti%taz7? n b. D048 hav* the`jat>Rnt$aei :to �C3Yiat#1i1 arcatfi- ttag t�s trtt agx azttege of 104.taraa, n az%�rixcsr atai $i #iar? `u Short -term pct an t:tzt 44*i�aOMQTM is ate rahich Occurs ixi a rojetively I?r #sfy dael�ia> tivs {Criod of tSae r t 3ar lr3a g '"eras atcta *iii a ure "it into the futu�ei. a. Do*& the project bavij j"&Qt#t which are r' iwdivfdu4:Ly� lUited, but cumulatively co"iderabla, Cumatl*tively Cold *rAbx,,* meain a, that the I &ramntacl tffectar of arn�, In prayacc are M6%idsrable wham vi *wed «. fn conai$ctjtan with thj effects of Peet �+t-0j @crag axz� #k0ba�sje .�utura. pVojtcts). j d./ hoes •t-fit project have #nvi>:asttel effects= wtai i ;taus* sub * »au: iiwi adversct: efiscts ;�`• on h,eia�at, either dfrea�tly ur istdirect�y? '" --^- -- II. TiISCVS$IL1 T sr VA £ttL"dLt. Lit `" the above ATitS13 £i.*.; r: atffiti�rr;aatzswars to r .' Q ` Sfi30ttts pxue at issnioct Cf ?srbas,ad ESiei$iRGian tsL4rps }. F off JI M1 _ ( l� rt on the basis of this initial en*xl tatiAn. i Alai the pra *Joct Coosa WT IIAV4 a si�ni£icant affect on the emixoxi�, ; ar.�di : 2rG'iTIVE DECLOA.TIC " will be prepared. I Eind that aithau�h the proposed pr*j t O'Uld` ihave a s*niticsnt8 effect bra the rnvirarmeent, thorn Wix1; a be 6 "sig>ti #icaa effect in Chit civS bMsa tiie *iGigatiaA ssite,sueres descrivoA on an , ' attached Sheet brYs boom a dad F4 thr, :?rrajaci:, �► 1�£GA xvr, DEGLAI� ION �tM sz Pp£k"1 . T Bind the pxe ironed pivj"t MAY have aipnifi.csnt sf:Act on the env:LU=nt*. &Ad "an EMYcO:4 =4T Bd ACT PJPORT is s`aequi r id Vat n Sipaatur - y 4{L� Or ZZ LY _ u i ��- �� A - HESOLUTiON Or THE PLANNINB COMMISSION OF THE CM, RANCHO CtaGA�h, CALIIt=ORNIA, RECt ,NOING APP7,a OFr i� DEVELOPMENT CODE AMEp iil' U-44 AMENDIWG SECTION 17.10.0306,.Z OF THE DEVELOPMENT 'CODE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCAtlfkOA, PERT�,iliiN& TO PARKING LOT AND SI[iEwAaa j SALES MiERM, on the 13th day of January, 1988, the Planning Gomi � #on Field a duly adVertisod public Waring pursuant to Section 65Zl5d of California Goverment Codes and rr v 1 dkREAS. the Planning CoWssiion finds it nectessary to clarlify and revise -tie Development Code regulations pertairsing to Patrking Lot, and Sidewalk Sales. SECTION is The Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Compiss %� finds 'Ghat the proposed ve opmen., Code A'aendteent 88-01` is an imPlementatian ok -,tt* General Plan goals and pOlicieg' and that the General Plan Environmental Impact report adequately covers any potential ''significant ad "rse i,�pects4, Further, the Planning Comerissiran f'indi` that nit subsequent `,,j s plt tnta1` envircnmeaial impact report isgequimd pursuant-to O+ivis #orFtiX3, Gh ter 6, section , 1166. of the Public. Reto6 -has Code, Specifically, the Plalrning CowlssV= finds: A. No substanti�, l ehanges are proposed in any goats or polities wtwth would require Major r:tvisions to the EIR. s'! B. No su tantial changes have occurred wit`t respect to the tircuestances under which the project is beinj urde aken. I �l C. NAf new information on the project has income ailable. it � - SECTION gc The Rancho Cucamonga Planning ;Commission has fo�ind that this riro . w, not creaite a sisnific� t adverse 'i�apact orr; Fora envtromant and recosmends issuance of a Ne=VEQ e D oration ort 3anu3ry 13, 1988. NOW `THEREFORE, 9 IT `l. Taut, pursuant to Sec #ion 65850 to 65$55 of the Calif6�nia Government Code, that the Planning Cftission of t the City, of Rancho Cucamonga fereby recnds Approval - of Aevenlo/ar�m�he�ntr� Conte A0endment 88.01 aRendjq Section` `? PLAN914G COMISSION RESOLUTION ti January 13, 198S, Fagg .r ;) Section V.10 cJ 2. Parking Lot and Sidewalk J- Fidrkiiig lot and sidewalk`s r res 4V lee p$rMAIM "irw ` rcial/retaii areas of �# city, iholuding retail7;tio�+esela businesses located within industrial areas, in connectlor: with current on.site businesses, suiw4.act. to the approval of a Temporary Use Permit as 'pwavideid in Section 17.04.070 and the follcwiwig criteria: a. Eac) sale is 'ties %fed to a maximum of thmee '(3) consecutive days; �i b. No sate for any single business other i businesses l4t., ted un 04. sa lour 4n"01 b or within 3 shopping center; shat be permitted withir. thirty (30) days of another sale c , A maxiwm of three (3) selo, shall b* pamitted for each business during each Calondar :yeas however., one (1) additional sale my be periaitted for arty business located within a shoppin center provided that -at least fifty percent (50%) of the businesses occupying the center participate concurrently in such stile; d: The applicant for such sale rust obtain the written authorization of the property owner and must provide proof of notification to all other businesses on the same lot,or parcel, or within the saAw shopping center, that ,a parking lot or 1 sidewalk sate will be conducted, the times it will be conducted and that no other sale within thirty (30), days of such sale will be permitted. e The items to be sold: shall be of the same ty p� that are regularly displayed and sold at thy. business location, f. The activity shall not present -a, hazard to pedestrians or encroach on a required building exit; g. Safe vehicle ingress and egress shall be provided at all time$ and h. Adequate parking shall be provided and maintained duM04 the' course of the activity for 4kth the business of the applicant and all other busi6iez as on the saahe lot or parcel or wfthin the sam+ ss .:aping center. o, PLAMIQ,_COWISSS Mi ,RESOLUTION - Development Ede AwwrAa3nt U-01 January 13, ass Yam 3 Z. _ Thit.. a Certifia4 Copy . f This Resolution and related liltertal My thy adopted by the Planniog. Commission shall be forwarfded- tb V* cit i Council., 4'. the :Planning Cox- issioti hereby recommands that the City 00041 appro %'e� and adaat iievelOPMAt Code„ Amwadment 88 -01 as stared;er+eq o APPROY6 ANO AWTED THIS 3TH DAY t V jawy. 1988. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OWFF H CUCAt it 1 Larry T. ATTEST o, ra c, T er, Pc I, Brad Salter, Deputy Secretary of: `the. Pyanaing. CoteEissioea of the City of Rancho Cuc&vnga, do hereby, cervu at than �oregoi�R q se;lutton �4 dully area. regularly introduced, passed, the P atr,rtq= Commisuion of the r" City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a- eting of 't*'PtA'nning omission held on vAe 13th day oq January, 1'k by theollaKing ve- -pit; AYES: -OWISSItN ERS: li NOES: COMISSIONBRSz ti - J ABSENT: COMISSIONERS. DATE: TO-, FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 13, IS98 Chairman 011' obers of the Planning Commission Brad 9u11+ar CitX Planner Cindy Norris, Assistant Planners a a -foot craneway o an eciti'Ing stt�tccture in the Heavy Industrial Land Use District ("Subarea 16) located at 12459 Arrow Highway » APF 17- 131 -33, i. BACKGROUND: On August 12,_ 1-987, the Planning Commission reviewed an appea of the conditions of approval for Minor Develo nt� Review 87 -24. Based up-on Additi*, Information ;resented by the applicant, the Planning ecwtsiion modified the ori�nal conditions, 4tich now include the d1 lowing: 1. That TAMCD shall obtain permission, and submit documentation to City of same, from the Southern California Edison Company, (SCE), to landscape'�that portion \,•f SCE's land which is adjacent to Arrow __ f Highway.— This should serve to screen a major view aecass from Arrow Highway into the project site. 2. The appligOli shall conduct a study to investigate the requfr nts necessary in order to plant a wi c l:'V ,:v of 0e reen trees along t�o western property line, r1ndl approval of the location, sire, and type of tree to be determined by the City Planner. II. ANALYSI5. The applicant is requesting to delete the second con on of approval requiring landscaping along the western property line. TANCO has demonstrated substantial conformance with the first condition, which ires landscaping along the portQ" of the Southern California Edson Company's property adjacent to, Arrow Highway through submittal of landscape plans for review. However, after additional investigation, TAKO :has indicated that they are unable to comply with the second condition for the following reasons: ZJ • There is a lO foot easement by the Chino Basin t nicipal Plater D s��rpict along TAMCO's western property line in witi+�'h an 8 foot sayer line is ITEM R 7 buried, precluding the planting all :large landscape materials. Shrubs and grouiiukover my be planted, but this will not .serve the intended purpose of screening th site from- views from- th, freeway. 2. The Southern Californila `Edison Com; -Lry f-SCE), which: r owns the property adjacent to TAMW i th+i west, has J�other� t,,-:e i trees or r creening materials within their right-of-way. r Staff reels that Wth the planting of fast- grot�in >:�ergr�srt -trays shrubbery along,$Ws rfght -of adjacent to Arrm li *Aky, that TANCO will have effectively screened any views ,into the site frow a . public rightrpf -way , . except for.,the freeway which is a winimm of 11270 foot 1frow T? CO's property. To that saints `AMCO izas - demonstrated that effective screening along '-the 'western party line would not be pas *ibje. III. RECOMMENDATION: "staff recommends that the Planning Commissloa "4,a UF".d sa amend inns of approval throw the adoption of the attached Resolution 0 idly s fitted, Q I Acity uer nnner ` Attachments: Exhibit "Air Site Plan Exhibit 8 - Lattor fry TAMCQ . Exhibit •q'R Exhibit pfM - Let er i;rom Soar ran California Edison Co. Let or frame Chino Basin Municipal stater Planning G Resolutionl ssial Staff Report of August 12,,,1987 of Approval o r r ti �'_yi) t,.; �e�rrtr�.o �• L toss tW CK7. A1B'CR[!f � s� "iil� i r'S /p� 1 t E ' fr ERR (a le Im CL de ow .y� op r CITY C i4 top- l i ors• + ' 9 � �It .(� PLANNM DIVEM EXH rr.- -A- ALE= T�AM C 0 �-- ' v POST Mich W7C : its. kmwAw>A. cwFc'wA it7'N iiuj w my -- f y " •, • �`•..sFf..♦ �. a :rarv.'...}a 4hi9 November 18, 1987 City of Rancho Cuoamoa4at Manning Div. P.O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, nA 9173Q Attu: Mrs Brad Buller Dear Mr. Buller: At the Planning Commiession Meeting of August ��r 1387, wa areere directed to investigate tbe`,planting of Imp � tt trees aloe our west y Y of 9 property line. ` ite wt,rer� to alto,-try to obtain permission from Edison to plant the Zvergre"As on their property. During-this time we also tie srmineci that we ,ceded to talk alea with daino Basin ft=ibipal Water District, who haft " a eaz+�atieztt 10' wide along aver west p�rspertK� ,.lines: � _ We have resceiveasf lack fY6ld bath Edison C,�ino Bassin letters ? stating that the wou'li not allow thick ti*�aes of planting, Y i:av,e enclose both lettesr, �, from Edison an4, Chin &asin. e Please advi ' as too ne*,. steps. 4' Thank itou, WilliaM J. al mm � Xan>�get* Energy & Ervirc5nmi� nbal Affairs CII 0 FFN �1 �,� r $*Uf qT -�',allfomla r'a�lls ;., Company FO "XS13 . fy'St ff. IR'AhCi5 STR31ET '1 : 9NTARS6. CAllF011lq{A �6t7mZ•33 {J �. J:, ��� itQlllEi'�C: SCXA3R3R - 1 � M 07iTA,CT N�M.GXk + � �Octobsr 23 1070 William j. Nelson Vnergy and Environmental Affaii:s � Tw-co r r P.: 0. Box 325 Etiw,anda, CA 91739 r SPAJECTa Middle Lugo -Kira ;14Ma 'S0( kvcT— /t VW Racytceaat for tandsc dcsnne alae 1 R/A lYile No. 0 - �it?�05i" Dear Mr. Nelson; � - T!- 'is is to confirm that the Southetrn Califoraa W Wison Company will grant Tamdo. a revocabl-1) li.c;enae for landscape i; purposes across the frontage of our subject to owned right of way on. the south aide of Arrow itoute. �f We ganh6t, h0W4ver# allow that planting of treen or ether screening within our property along'--the eastorc prof y line; �f adjrcent to your .plant. This "Old criiate : a. potential fiarasrd- tra our fcture transmission ling facilitiele, when the, ��sea apprdich maturity. It 'would: Also effectively reduce the „usaisle width of our, . right of way at ',­this this locakion. ( we would also like to,, ad"-, s ld the trees be pla?yti�ci =1 inside Tamco property, at' a, 3.�s ?� tlon. which wOulA 'result in over- , hang onto our proper t, we W;;�U d °e2c*rcise our iightss to trim said trees as necessary to eliminate any hazard to our facilities. _ Please let us know if you need additional irformati-::)n or assistance, i c SinCerel�y ae.e RCS--od 4i ib cc: K. R.' Cudgges lI L. Moffitt D. Ma S'tevensow -, , j S9ePtsmbor 20, l9s7 cFriONO 1B BA 41" MUNICIPAL [, .' ` T E Tamca DISTRICT T➢La.EA!HO:vi 4114 407.972 .� P. 0. B= $2s `fELECAPKtS iylati 40>3.0TD2 F-tivandat, Calitoz.da THea r. NOWAK Attt ti.ons Sill w son facts %atallatici�\ or TrAss in Cmm xa moment We havo r -sceivad gbur re � ftt �f Sa►gta�� �.cF° X2671 r'i�. plant, l:srgee (1'0' too '1001) trees eti�� ocr la F aaas0*ant rlom Che 4oti aid* �+f, tfag t Tame* property. As Brae ei tW4ed, ohr �,#� � s�a:as (.}\ Zr+���yssyes the g�Tama {prropo yyaet �d ,y j S *� t:(,* $g {�.1a�talplatfi�� "�a4 (-, \•+1 ARMRR�JN�,�lyay as 6spi�p i&y�( ^�. yls�gii� {, +f1iw�ip .li p y iyFµtl>�g�y?i�r:�' tl"� i��kpl�. yX�R�.y4yt�� ,y �3l�y�j our J1 easement aers ' ac ptatbls. ' 701 to 5.t 0 v` area q t , OU d"Crikss4 in your aarrasgeai d�ence ars ,u tcceep si�a as, asnach /�k�sf�- i+�ht and rood syett t cZU14$ ds !�qe our l+fpj+r IJU0. Tftl aXJ#tasue o C zc z tress near vw caYsoMant L wMld s p: line fi r, dittioul, it n0 i oaee3lalae =4 in a h ca it xra L V=jjj rya t7 * 4' rsmov G than iilt:srfmrintj trsas by the property, oWter. x, If rou eve any questimm, pl"z* can tho unaltr ii trcx� Very ' �► '+ off, � Theo T. i'f0V&k, diMo,�ael. llaqj1Fr BY: r` On Acabap o AYi w t'or It9aa;AVOKA. L'!i }iXt'�iNa& 11�74' G wMV V.-- v+aU.— tV-ta +Hrcimw rRw.ReM >q,..ii i irfWemt t+d��e J kMt i Aa+iOt!$ 9 $4WAIM a ,rat?'y$ aawfi.w i7u>., tV - 3YaYrf FI rS�f.xnr - A., So...ssr,eaf.1. G.... CITY _OF PAtdCH i DATE August ,12, 1937 t9r; TO Chairaan and- Kembers of the Punning Comission, FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cinoy Norris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL\ OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF MINOR UEVELOPMEHT ��' " e ProPASe a a ion a a o0 cran to an ex s ins structure in the HW.:� Industrial. Land Use Uistrict�,(Subarea 15), 1,°,catec at $2459 Arrow Highway - APH 225 -. �1. -33a I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION; �. Action Requested: Appeal of the Conditions of „Approval for minor evelopment Review 87 -24 B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: { - acan n -jas .r a ecific Plan, Subares «5 ` South - Industrial /Mahofacturirr Industrial„ Specific Plan, Subarea I$, Eaat - Ameran Steel &'i IM; lndustHal Specific Plan, SOarea'15 Nest - Southern Calivomia Edison Co,x Industrial Specific Plan, SuW4'a 15 C. OeWal,PSan 0esi_quations: Pr�oje" Sle - eavf nliustrial Worth - heavy, Industrial South - Heavy Industrial East: Heave tndustrial West " Heavy it ditstrial (( 0< Site Characteristics: The site contaiAs an exisiing steel 1 me ng ac nTy W outdoor storage of scrag materials located on approximately 30.12 acres of land. The subject Krcel is. located south of a 14 acre vacant parCel of land end. east of the Southern( aliforni4,5di'son right -of -way. r E, . Applitaola Re Uldtions: ,., ;Minor building additions, are `subject ti i" 0 0eve o - n review and approval by the Sity Planner. a t:S PLANNI9G COIISSIP STAFF REPORT - - - - MD 87-24 - TANCQ Page, 2, III 9ACKGRDUfet: Cn ,Iune,t, 1987, TAMCo surAjtted a pr¢rpos�Y1 to build a `W" square foot: addition to them existing alt shop Taufli °�JI. this eras a structural `�ddiLtfon of lass than 5p PA.-Coot-of :the ex existing floor area, the application was subject to, a,, W''nor oevelopeent,t2eview.. on duly 9, 1957, Wnor Development Review, d7 -" 24 was appr9yed by the Plannfftg Divfsfon 'used upon certain findings and s�.�biect to" several 4onditions. - lt'ce conditions tM06 €hosed in order bring ,the' site into conformarc`e w:th 'the rd5 and reOR -MUMs of the Industrial MAN). Specific Plan (641bit e Sunsequ tl . In a letter 'tad JUly U."1987, Mthibit "D "� aOeA ;hit cif the r : ired conditions of for, Approval fob liinor f oeveloc 3?t Review 87-24. ThOr reques�t°ed waf�'er is based on the following ie sons: f 1. Due to the high winds which occur in this area, TWO, frets that it 3vould he extr ly , dfffictAt U add solid fencing, along rn their aste pr rty l ine or to build a syructrl7,y roof =*W. ( y� 2: As a result of the extrwecheat ginerated from uth it smelting opera'Lions, p4�i�tiwg the exi_stifig building E Or root equipment wouid be difficult 1, C e'ost prohibitit a. 3. That the abcIss road on the eastarn side of the existing chafn link fence does not allows adequrte room for landscapin. 4. That views from the 1 -15 freawray will-,not be entirely `. blocked as a result 0 'the required screenf g measures iIA. ANALYSIS: The Industrial Specific Plan requi,'res that all outdoor, sc ar , lards shall be screened with solid, view obscurfn4 ferc;ing and manse landscaping, In addition, whenever possible, all; -roof equipment shall, 4e cowapletely scree!wed frame view. , upon further exact presented by However, based r►atian of the, site and additid"41 infarction applicant, staff feels that the required ronditfons W bib unreasonable for this site. Therefore, o + .-staff suggests ,thmt the fpllsingondii:ion away be,•more appropriate: , That lfto shall act t to o.btafn permission on frow tte Southern CWforrsia Edison Co. (SCE ) to @andscape that portion of SCE's land t�iwich is ad aMt to Arrow Highway,' r ` This VhOfild, serve to Strom # Wjw vitW access fftz Arrow Highjay into the project site. = i � � - �'�A j +�s��car { vfrylis �) � ® �4 _ �tw.:�ef.�e+.. -M •.- .�.,,`Y e- m..L�= i`.—.k ,v- +a..,.... �p...y� � ' � .-r j, l ` 't. .•, ' ..ice•; ��1 i ►AO►OfKti AYe.nraN r �;�,sF `� ANIL Aia• i tt 37 R u.R a 1+'•• � ,` 4r xra sf ,E ae. i R�tr. . :n';:5.3li+�0�;liliT6 r1t.ur:„ NQ( cay"CF 1 _ ntm1 F•ANNM DI 'e n dtE ry` t� i Q CnT OIF RANCH... CUCAMONGA _. Pm arcm tae ova, t saaw.Aa9173a, (7t +) sh -loos Ju1y 8, 1967 7,_ Gerald L. Telford 12459 Arrow. 141,q V-W-, P. 0. goy 32: — Rancho cucnm ga CA 91739 , SUBJECT: MINOR "AW RMEW 87.24 - PADPW :WITUN ON A 50 FOOT CONEDdR1' 14 SIN EXIS"M SUIL91N& Dear Rr. Telford.- The Ceyeiopment Review promss for the � dascribad project has been xucce3sfuliy conplieted aloe approval halt boeat�'Lgrented Etas soap the fa7iartng findings and conditions. 'Manic for yo* partidippa�. lots and cooperation during" review "frocees. � sincerely that thi8 recess• hits been a positive experience for all involved. This- decisioA sbail,ba eftjewtiva following a 10-� OPPW Period i minq with the d&t�of this lettom FINDINGS A. That the Proposed prodoct is cenxis t with the awral plan. B. That the propos project is in a�ordaMe wiW the objectives of the, Tndustmi �ific p18d, a purpose of the district in which the site is IeCrted C. That the Propm,J -projects tA"er with the cone Lions health. abl safth�ey " will not be detrieental to the // tblie i V Welfare 6r matorielly inju+��ou3 to Pr°ap�►W" or i�iprov is In the aicinitwy. U. That *we PA's peat will comely with each of the apyaicablo provisions of the Industrial Specific flan. This project 'is approved subject to t1he f0rl0wing conditions: � L All outdoor storage and yard &"as shall. be s: reenact froee view through a combination of V14W obscuring fencing and landscaping (Section IV f9e 9Zi. ampr' ifay'A1t Kim f r i _... - - L. ilfor( „ July 8, 1907 G , a$e�o ' If you Should ham Any 4Uestianm 4ndy Vorts at ifree to aunts& corl �arA{'rr�i3��i ease a a241 - Sincerely, CMWTY DEMO "C --EP TNW PL DIM C �' hAftr j covikc3tonr & S.e:s we , TLLLrMC1kC (7141092-0301 ATTORNCYS AT JM w - .. Mau i kt a cnv +aT..a POST O VIVICZ AOsi Reis •, MARpcc a *All N an 'C..". d.yTARIEi. C^UFCkRN1A a)i7Ga oco*dle o _%A j ROatRT t 00".GIt, OONA60 0 ASIAM gyp Rost"t, zcmAbk:R 3GWA .•. 7 ii �.I j I7V7 RRA-ofs9N y J'. ANMONT %wf, �yt J �' - t"t It ANOLRfON NANOARL J. 011Rj TRACY t.. V�pt��t�A�.y�7 ■1T '6tRAlQ R'QAT N F7Et7�RNIS TiAI+ViS. IYC�IM JA)-C% MCnik naCN - JUL 17 11987 RCiCM N Amen RtaeeeA MASa Planning Commission � x! lo City of Rancho Cucamnfiga � Post Offl,Z7a Box 807 \114 . Rancho Cuc&m0ijga, CA 91301 Res A ,cal Fro_ m City PlannerIn 0ec3.sion in MiMOr f Aeve o-" ent°Rev aww 87 Pro s ton to a C:anewa to an 1xistina Bus, na A�Sp cant_an :;iPzt ant: Tamccy� —` Dear Planning Commissionarz: Tam:co hereby appeals each and every condition imposed by the City Planner in connection wzth Mincer Development Review 87 -24. Thosq conditioas are contained in the City . Planner's letter dated July 8, 1987, addressed to Gerald Z. Tel4csd; a copy of which letteris attached hereto ,for reference, Tamco bases its appeal on the ground that each and every conditig�in set forth in the attaci ad letter is ax1i- teary and unre*tonable under the circumstances: r (1) T'he fencing condition„ The'goundat3ons r. (footings) of the present fence .are not designed to with- stand the added wind losdiny that would r ult from the addition of slats.. Winds ; n ", . -:1 Etiwa:nif rea routinely are in the 80-go miles per 11ou4, range. r - addition, thra addition of slats or tho iaplacsment of a existing.fonce With solid materrial# would not serve to obscure any par;:: of Tamco's operations from Ttiea0 from the I =15 freew&y because the freeway is elevated above Tamreses property. (2) The landscaping condition. Because of the elevated fre awe: , propoeed Landscaping along the westerly prcb*rty line would: also sot obscure Tamco's operations from view free the I -15 freeway. Also, the east sides of the fence (on TamcoIs property) is ;paralleled by s narrow access road whict separates the fence from the slag pile, leav rg no planting ajea available on that side. a. All lighting is to -be shieittad to confint light spread within the site bottix�ariees, f� Particular concern:, shall t* for lighting adjacent to residential areas,,,, Cquipetent 5crovising A.L the purm* of Equipment rcreetni SuAdar4s► shall be tee allow for the use of paiart while ys preserving the architece Ural cmrat.tetr And int i°ty of the, surraanding. anvironmient. �. Equipmt is deemed include exterior ��)cttanicata�r e1 tria�tipeea+t, sse a►s� AID itx�, �'�s° rky'"�+Gl9;�a bt�Q Rrtiuex� ortge nklt, a�taliite aite3h an�Ca� °rnae. '!"h� foil leg stgtt rg shall apply a�ccoriinq iZr � i and !Jse ca;e ory: _, a. x3► roof" aAll and sm nt+ed tquipm n►t- shall be smemld (�it a within ell I1 land use ; q'Cjgnrits, except MINN Impact, HuiW lndus�^ial and Weavy fridastrialc l �. iiFteereYeer *gibliis a1'e roof, wall -aead grexlrtd' � - as untad aqu #patent stall be screened on ell sides Withi hat�t _ nib Sit Heavy Indnsk iol#atd i�a,r�+,,ndostrf��l✓�atagories» v c. All s&"ing ` sal ` be architecturally iritteratta -VAO . the %oilaiing:. Zign and where pusible a roof paia�apv wall shall te= used, to str+ rcatf r wahll munted aegttipeeentr iihere roof- avunted Ietchatnital ewiOmt and/or ft, * projects i vee: ically thaw once and' "•half (I- I : -ifetet above the roof +r.,�t f�parap#t it shalt bee screened bar tin areltiftecturally deasignW erKtosurq. which Whits a pereranent riatare with -th* L)uildfr.g design MW is detailed 4onsiste:bt wilth twilding. " Where roef- mount{ wChanical tggipmovit,,��7 and/or ductwort projects one and, -half fR -iJE} feet,or less above the Mm or roof parapet it shall be painted consisttetnt with the color schattte 0 the building in All cases'. `tgr%ge irt4/SOreapMr4 —) A.6. The purposes eaf storm area ratgguulattioegs is to etlene for oat -site SUM* which is scMno-d f vie* fro* #leer Wif, right•of-wy aW froo land used in colelet- � lic vieeO.. —sand IS architecturally cw ati bTree with the si3a'rowd � \ enviroaeent. TIv* folloksin$� standards Mahn l apply according trt Land Use cktWryE ,"" ee #« Indaextrial Park cat*gery - No outdoor s a�t Shall b*p�t i tte d f ocapt f 6r fleet \� v*hf: os and light trucks (mt mooding 6 :I100 lbs. ). OutdW story* tav*$ toy bat emt4d at a height 1* ex"a 4, fr" i aGt f!"Ish qrie4, l: scrtrr"Od fr" a pualic view 'bY concr+U , O►stanry or other , a�iaRila(� �tt*r�s1sR ,_; ts• areal Industriaal � Or Gtnora l Industrial /Ull S*rvat c .� ;" . All materials, lf"V iii Rt aasd "oaa*ratirtg tr xks at l eer t o `sin a n asaclaxtd building or *YA public view. ere c. ' MMINIum I�c t tiO4YY Industrial sent Mmvy Indus al \` Utegories All eeat"i els, 1N4�1/Af raw su l a ipta*rat X--d gw-ratift trc shall be ttgr" vitmn an a�lox* twtr ks c - , °""`�►a, or as storage am. tt stars � ;fir :sa�awors rlltt! I?' Of a 3 frOU26 0411 be scraamd« d« kythfrr e' of th *�kv right -0. ! way sll }outd000r storm, s It .bat scz �ned •+ WAV iwsu w+ °sMatawwt fate lic 04v from +fit tom#' `e pri ftwy. 1 a a.+1t4 :rowing the Dervor* F � consider that us* or ca4abi►�ation a'k or aeasonr, I W611sr b6- 1109, dons* landmping, or building ass. � 0. Mthi:t sail Land Us* categw'-t4s OX Ctpt JieaYy wawanesM.�n Inda►:ttrial, all storage am, Kr**ning sha11 aie+�a �r�ess be architecturally ill /Wato With �r �.�.mr�.. stcnw"ietg buildings by tt* use of . _ • •s �• conear*t*, tasonry or' other xi rilar *materials fDotr h exceed a *Jot of 8` froea hii[h�-�� f. within the Heavy IrAtstrial cut* area scrowin s x y or g may ta�ia:�e ,raesonry or , ca." 't*: Wood, to=tal, or."d'airs , lies with ' WOW �#6t- �#. Storage of ARtorials or equipment steal! not aixa:e*ai 3cr`6sT wot Kithip 1.00' of st *gat frontiea 5crabtns. rnz - 21 G Pt SUBAREA 15 (�"tinuadi G Odor; Al's uses $hail be operated so as not to omit ar unpleasant r,*" which are perceptive to - e aCausing the gie perms ' beyond any l*t line of the tat MtAt rg such uses. . i Hoot, and Rt are; All uses Zieat l be oWated ` Ias Apr- -: uc dity, beat, glare or high- i Llnsity lllcjolaastian which is perceptib2e without i �trs�e►sts -by the °average p+ r3on white on any tat for I arted residential purposes or 40y industrial Prop" with, Class A or R Perforeearca standard �esition Speciri Considerations Areas within 6001 of Oevore Fr4w&y shall be required to >eomplottly scvoiz- outdoor storege fron view alr' �� 13evflre rte corridor. Heavy ufscturirm�� : jw;iw s adjae to' Subarea 8 Subarea and 14 are requq�ttrEd, tot+ r�op+er9`tId reN ,100`" building sotbaecV along O)ftting Where a Rai i Urvict 'Spur i3 nocessmry, aojamt to ' J {an" ,streer� fe gt, its,la pe sttbwk�` &y be ° Z nui r:6 no ss than 20 from Ul time face of curb, extendiry the Rant Service righi'ef-Ky asaintOmd- de th+;' landscep� setback. Thi t-andscap ng wi thin the � shall be designed in order to help ��.reen loading +�c. °i+ities. g Parcels which adjoin existing or,,propo" w" yead,�xpur� lints as indlcated on the Subarea are v*Q'Ared ,30 bee developed i faardame with Rain Servict Standards; if rt Iil, $Octan IV.G; APPOMIX 01, Scrap operations shall be re"fred to conforw t,O the foll�sin ,tas�desrds; r Fences and wells. '= All rations and storakge, inc U ng a equ pmt used in businesst;> shall be with an enclosed' buildin ,gar within an arau ,r Mlosed by a solid wall ,, so`ii view obscuritC-jence. All fences and Oils shall be of a unitom is Qht in relation to the ground '` which they stand and shall =_ be a Sinism of tight foot tG '! not to exced sixteen feet Clfr, -' in height. All yard gates shall bat solid view obivring and no less then tight feet t641 in height. t 1 21 1 str"t SkIl be cantruct" of sate. gar l All f� gor and walla r to viwt frog *t public All f walls still b* w0far* color &1.4 *i+g" tit a *orkok"likt 9&"* # Asa trtis '0011 = plantad' scr ,i mW4 Side rA mr prove-r4 '�01's I aid irk o l XV-91 -> t n 4J notr O"rA sox M C'nrWAk' cux�apex { c Gnq wmal -RI 01' iIVED -- Ju i y t98 cr7 O �q cuaAUOWA cur. {� ONISIorr ,U6,= �� 9'967- Afr � Brad Butler City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. not 407 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917r40 Dear Nr. Butter =' �andscoping Along' Arrow Via, rrr►�e�c n Eiz.closad is a oopy'of our July 2Q�.,1037 iii r? to 5outhe � :5\ ti4�+ Ca i i jrorn i s Edison Company request €aigr their-6 pprsava l of oee�*. Hi plant oleandeisl On Edi�Oa prr7 #rty alon tee #outh s >fds \` \cf Arirow j g yF .Edison has approved our proposal, as tadic'ated fin their tester or July 24, 1987, a copy of which is snclased. Also el*closed dpy of Tampora4 J� ntry Permit :which -our 44d, presid -4irt, Dwight- lorlow, has oiCaute& and whfoh -aft havi ret`isr .fig Edison. Ile understand that you fyjj l #end us f'k 'dad not i,f tadt iaan 6f the August 12th planning , most ing, which a •representat--fte of OW* Company will Very truly yours, W. K Vic* President Finance and Adminiatrat r"o:� W4Ls b tom..... � \_.... _. _ ./i�.��.- lM'���hl�-`S��w. vW`i'1�°`•'� .._ - . - MALY4. CAUFnRMX0237i � �� - RCil4 FaKaTi♦;Rtf�`[FArrTRsF,NT� ... =A Ju17 24, IM7 ftm 32.S' 9ttwKnds. CA 91733 � t< _.. ') Atterstit�ta. 29&c 4 . L: iixssill vl � _. Presidesnt Pi11a72�f luL doistration ,&a#nlf�tta^�ing �3cesiaC+�il`atl�Gfs'� VIP 06. l'#Q 47 1 V* bava reer,.eiVMA lc,�At. rsquosi ..tss� errsin& tom► hest iris of aeubjalt praF"Ity .or the placemat of old"der bush" "and sprinki- or s�. requ"t i°ar tho l ciiiivie e.jtwi a sent had b"a anraited. in v;-', Of the tiswc - liaaitations plated on thi ra"ortsry #nter z7sr ;it- is.; - attache for ant -.y to tha gwrrsperLj�. '1"bt linanam agr"M wt aaii5» a ltroceetaer3 . in ita,;nacasl manner end ini,ll bat torwaardtd `to TkkXW for exxi5vt c�. � about ninety (to) dsys: Ple asi :sots that our '3iaanse sa4s enes contain. a 40-da`p C*4tallAtiao ci to provide for 3a�aaach of to[.t t ar 'Mism's t6 noed Utilize dais pirop.^►srt , hosuaver, as a roAttical msittex* it vould'v* -extresl ly e� y�ta —Ca eol.,t tiesuss € except for non- empliatnc6, miany of our tonsats "fitssing eaallaod our �_40paarty Lhcttt interruption #$r , 3 years pry "re. Also, TAW* will brat V"Uir&d, to sseurs and lkesg its fdre*,,u $300,00 Inv s a ma policy, innlud �tilatti�n ft Califern ddison as sat i ticn*1 nsurad. The drivewy 14scss4.ian +rill bi :Provl448 by tdison at r, ltet aa : . onto ypur have been plats raviow*4 1A furtbQr sv a b P'4ase raxacuke the attse" piF *.t and return the eopj��arkerd "flit Copy- in 1 that oncloaad 'Welopia._ 8}svld you have any questions. please ?:& nttsct to at f�l�rJ a"�L' «Sile, Thinj you ler your aaagwxltion in this matter. F%rp truly YWIM, 6; �_ Bight of Way a$'V :,, o vatiq TEIIiA0�14-!!Y�1�t"Ai� P�pfMfT Tkim Er2iagn'ypn7ta€ytaaaNd on ¢4404,1tiddle loco -Mira Lauri kY 7/L 1i/W ad3acent fia Arm f Rout& as shestrrs on the attuc€€m lop. � t?uRi�a[: C�tattatian afr oieandtr�Mts�€ats,aad spritokt &r sgtoe+e. «� fAtc Cornmwxirg- as'a'.'_s 94* 1967 - ----- Zt Susx -OTT None .. ata aaRCO+ aa�It+ tt. rpntlfpo�. rtatiatlar�e .rtASr±rt,tight�mQtaiearcbn� a1'�Oat!!'.pf, r� AcarAaCTaC. }•1,j � , iwaEF€r,.A�;n�u� Pat€wktea; t+ pre€( ?.`rx ftwedt. +ra! for ra emd ttnir tegar�i C� tFnpuyan etad eny :� P"M Of p + ng u+der"Porm af, to,�"� cult indatsrify Ede; P os .m r►d eta, to ear oea ;«wwat tetdpedtlsrar • , in- .:s�n� �.w pcopq+tr= c€.F+Sio�ar. ice ea�scnoora ar,�E •eiNipr�, ,� He cr€d 1�t;na+Rt+w. . wnplo;eas. epar+ta,,� fir, t0d Parkes Qe a+hwY -U er death of peeeorw taeuili�l in wW ftw , c;tsay ar uktirk: crony uxr `�na�wx�w4a *mm" �&riti�+wx.H.ltek ies.a� may 1 �ww ifOnl ll; iCdVf�eRN#",�- ��AY�F$ia uii€eriyeaOY VIJ�.�pd:$bYpil4}fP$F G6�t€Oi kMO wARRAkM.- �l tasxp iy aeatraaod agxt r�seri stw FerrrattdiF itse €lea P ► ►p ir. a�ht IEcN� x� maheo : -. t�eoraeena'Ian,cowroeae. wan'+ n► y.« prarni�. urt�aiwid ►eeMAtt«erN�s;€nolad€aprr,owe ew a�n+ rt€ e�wsew�MC} dkeamKtPaeikae�tnGndane <+yaveYsreA�"",•a�awnaM.M:�rre FE! Th ewaboafeeat :' Eratie t -4.fyy irradwnoi;k suaeoC tl kN¢ ! AS$kQWIM., T* Pw n* WOW ft,** wo end pairAwpw a4 Pbrinifre. mrv� �osat bt aniq dr ttetxh"& Aq . ftemacfaQaaonwgrndetthigpe�t��t +Irat�on'aa€.aaeiloa.. 7ER�l�k?L "TIQH: Thk pstit€k M rNww�deAnmed€fdel�+ie �tt6 ee►le opS7psrytuf dkcregcr€ aP b�tn mud the leermttirec aGreKto peaa€eWXrxtfndetri�+pra+l�e�lr upwt rxlti�f ae«rddpnar+d L��Edteas ariti3wha�ni neprpeen�ve> AUTHMY- TI�gCpxrnkiiNiKMdwbjGdtOOt ?atfen➢'Ordw►Fla.O of th6Pahifc'u�MY�cibMrNweionef"S€ "Of clued wrrcYefiactira Jute iQ,1ON, rnoorperaMd rice _ 'f *& -A*^ penrnftrw agmee to campy *#I a fif - �ea.l e�rer. sitaf ..anafoceTtaN!.Mtlr&pttl�arrll. ' z. Perrtr#�ew apras that pay uead on €he tabl t poporty *W be t"d eo ae to maletmin a uk-tA eau cteerarsueat ;..3d�>�,.��yfisat ham! eiloYeAftc9a{ectriCitCOnkaisyan �prapeety'" � _' 2 Srgrmi'.tes that pVAft f w@h a*qu*4eooees to a® d &"M ,$ fea168r+s and ad no erne r NY c kr Cs any inttafKSaaeaikt lt>e f� �t �Ectiiior`e e�Plhct�iatl�a+eNr€e0e. �L a PetinZfKe wd ratpteh or rafuaf, nor ON"* to hay pNiaed a rodAh�l. ally vaf�p a► hid x* qte Itd ar&e. ftffA o k*w swage ra to st" a MP* art" fot vetides eat to Wk w vo w,w" t r y � o�orM�tt>��1 meta vahideo eilrwallY u�idetneetlt e€r wetf€kt teh (toj diet at �s dip etfe of s�- awei;,rAd eiwarr�aet Psm*tw awm a lack or does any €snag tK gaw ac of tE ,eatk day wd t ct the owvtf' ` k 5. Upali t1+W9� ttw pimti €kt 7nlil W raotan thb proiriiaee to a oondltlott ape } er potbie eq fttet�Htm .. r ts„ fkDd€ fidippt, ettucts€ ree,« et: CtXMJiatk9n�?ftarnmrbfeat�bntbuerigPot�eta !edh «eacploeh+ef<a�i+r/ Expnmitttdoat. aeidpropwtlr „ i j rave raad x+d +e+drrstand and Etta to c;+.wAh aN TAk xx- TjtW 5u&Visorr Proorcrtw M 12959 � g .� • Jer bMta Pr�sldant ,. -- """ -"`�'� Etiwar&; A 39 P tS:+ aoi�ftt,1 6 .C1 iIOGl1f ' Cl Atfagee �� {�'14i 98y 29Zi-�.r c, per. ��•� Ail ow KI 7Ctt etion RESOLUTION NO AftL A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CtEC14�:ONCA PLANNING COMtiISSION Apfl ROYJNG Mlka CEVELOPAENT REVIEW NO. 87 -24 LOCATED AT 12455 ARROW HIO AY - IN THE R,�YY INDUSTRIAL. DISTRICT - = APR: 229 - 131 -33 WHE€ M-)on the lZith day of Jame, 11987, a Complete application was filed by TAMCO for raaieM -,of the above- described project; and WHERL;AS, the Chat Planriir granted approval of Minor bevel opeant Review 87 -24 by letter dated July 8, 1987 subject to pertain specific . conditions st4ts4 therein; and WHEUU, the City P� anner °s approval of the application was timely appealed to U ds Commission oil July 17, 1987; and WHEdtEAS, on 12th dPy of, ,August, 1997, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hol a Stating to c�prsidor the aboxu- described proj:sc;t. NOW THEREFORE l tto Rancho Cucamonga Planning ConmissiO4" resolv�d ai follows:-, Skim 1 Tit t the followin:� can be miat> 1. at the proposed profit is consistent with the . Objectives of tt* General Plan; and - 2. That the proposed use is ` iW accord with the objective of the Industrial' Specific Plan and tine 1 purposes of the ,distri+rt in w-hi!;h the iita is located, a1 3, That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the appiic3ble provisions of the Industrial ;ipecific Ploit; and 4. That the proposed use, t0gett-*r with the conditions applicable thereto -diil not Abe detrimental to the ptablit health, salty, or welfare, or matewiall,y_ injurious to rproperties er improvements in ttj vicimtiity, � "' SECT ION 3: That Minor be'vei6`" ni Review No. 87 -24 1s approved subject to ''he" o owing" conditions: 1. That TAHCO shall obiain permissi,on Find su6it documentation to City of saw, from the Southetian 0 "' California Edison Co., (SCE }, to landscupe that n % portia� of SCE's-land which is adjacent to Ar"m H49 &. This (thould serve to screen a =jdr view access, from Ark4 Hf ow# into the pro4 t s#a. r o kWHI14 QMISSIT 'ESCsLUTION NO. �1 $7-4 TAWZ Page 2 2.: Thai applicant shall conduct a study to inves � ate' the requirements wessary in order to pl�t a ` windrow of evergreen trees along_ the western Ji of , property lino. Final approval off`,the location, 44ae ` and type of tract to be. determined by th&T"-tity 0 Planner. - r, o 3. A detailed landvApe land irrigation, plea shal -1 be submitted f r "review and approval by"the Planning Division prior to tha issuance of buil':11yrg "mits. 4. The site shall be 4eveloped -tee accordance, with the approved, site ,,plan$ oyn file in the Planning Division, the co ions - Contained haarein, and Daava :lopeerS Cade rii :jations. Prior to any use, of the project site 'or business activity being co+mmonced. thereon 01 conditi6el of approval $hails be coted to tree satisfaction of the City Planner. S. kpp val 'f 01 e is request shall waive ca fiance ?1 titans of the Dtvalopraen *� Cam, and all N her,' appl,,cablr City Ordinances. � applicable, coraawM +4, `Olsns or specific plait in effect at the , time 0 building permit Issuance. b. Approval shall expira; unless' extaer by the Planning %oaaasiss otr .: ifi baOildirri{ 10i t, are not issued. or appro,vaa- -� --A&s not t ry, €d within Owen %y�foa�r t24) moths from the date of approval. APPROVED AM ADOPTED THtSqM DAY OF AUMST, 1.287. P4Ad UING COMISSION OF CITY U RA' CJ�IOI KCHCU s _ ` Aar ATTEST. e re ry 77� W 0_ MAR or August 32, "3987 I, Brad BulYor, DiputY r^etary of the Planning COrission of •4 City of Rancho CUC4041.4' do hereby certify, "at the foregoing Resolution dul aad regula6 �Y' intr 4ctd, Passad, and adopt*d by the Plannit)g Coxtd$$ on of tht City of at a rsqular� mating of the planning CowisSton hold on the 12 -°h dAY of Auo.-st, 3987,_ by the fol lowing izote'- to -wi't: kyES. CC*ISSIf R3a BLAKESLEY tMERICif,"CNITIFA, MCM E ? 5\ NOES. + COWS "Slows St NONE t ASSENT: C0HNIS�jI0NER5 :T0LST&Y AD Q G V i i 3 n' c < RESOUTICS NO. 87 -146A A RE WTiON OF THE RANCHO CLICAMOKA PLANNING C0MNISS OP1 M DIFYI THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR HI � DEVELO T !REVIEW NO.: 07 - -24 L-OCAUD AT 12469 ARROW HIGHWAY 11TOE OEAVY INOUSTRJAL DISTRICT - APN 229 -1Q -33 A. Recitals. (I) TAKO K�lx filed an app0l of a cooditionn of approval of, Ntnor Developmeit Review fro. 81rU as described in the title of this Resolutr�.. ilG (ii) On the 13th, of January, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucixwonga; conducted a Meeting on the appeal and concluded said meeting on that dal.*- ,1111 A17 legal prerequisitaal to the adoption of thin; R�salution have occurred. B. Resolution, - N!} 6 Tf CREFOR2, it i§" hereby found= termined arty rbsolved by the Planning Cnxaeission of the City of Rancho Cuc. -ga as follows 4 a 1. This Commissioii hereby specifically finds that all of the facts I set forth in the Wltalt, Pam A, of this Resdlutior are true ant correct. 2. Based.,4WA substantial .evidence presented to this C fission during the above - referenced Ming or January 13, 1988, Includin,g written and oral st-iff reports, this CoWssion hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) , llte application applies to property located at 12459, Arrow. t; Highway with no street frontage and lot depth of 1550.88 feet and is presently improved with easermts natessary ror access along the eastern property, line and utility connections, along the nest and south prop-"'- lines; and �(b) The property to the north of the subject site Is Heavy Industrial, the property to 1 the south Of that site consists of Heavy Industrial, the property to -4.1e east is Heavy IndustriAl, and the property to the west is Heavy industrial: 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented td this Comission during the above-referanced,pceeting and upon the Speciff , findings of ftdts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commi$sian hereby finds and. concludes a3 follows; G i - _ (a) ThmtI the proposed project is .oh'istent with the t actives of the General Plan 'iOd _ 1, 1 '` ti PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,. MINOR DEVELOPMENT_ REf IEW _81-24 - TAMCO Page 2 r, c ' (b).. That the proposa�-�ase is in accord w3itW the objective of the industrial Specifi. Plan and the purposes 'of the district in the site Is located; and (c) That tlef "proposed use is'in coppliarce with each of the applicable provision;: of the ' Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) That the pror3ye use, Wither with the < conditidns apulia?fble tatreto, will not be detrimkotal to "tote public heal,", safety, or welfare, or w teeally injurious -to properties or rr:!rovements in the vicinity.` 4. BHsed upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Comnissidn hereby amends the condi66 s of approval as set forth in Resolution No. 87 -145 %rough, deletion of Condition Number Two (2) and the renumbering of.the remaining cooditionraccbrdingly. S. The- Deputy Secretary to this Commissi'wn shall certify to the adoption of VE40s Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY. 1988. <; PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCi NGA BY: arry T. HENRI, Mairman =. . WEST: Brad-FUTTer. upary re ry I, Bra d.'5uller, Deputy Secretar y of the Plannin g C owAissi r , of the City of Rancho 40�amonga, do herddyy certify that the foregoin Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the ` -1 City of Rancho Cuc ?ga, at a repitlar meeting of the Planning Commission held I on the 13th,.day of January, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit:. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES; COMw1ISSIONERS: ABSEOt COMMISUONE?TS: � i t t: CITY OF RANCHO _CUCANON TA. DATE. January 13, 1998 zsrr °:,, TO: Chdf man and Members of the Plc- ling Cwmission t ,FROM; Brat! @tiller,. Cit�7 Planner BY: Nancy Fotrg, Associate Planner o SOBJECT: APPS& OF THE AMENID`M1 #T To THE UNIFORM SIGN PROd5A FOR &AMILK- the request a appea s a s. s an n denying .'tfre proposed amendment to the previously sign program for ._ Cucmonga Village Shopping Centel-, located at the northeast conger of Foothill Boul,vard and Ramana Avenue .1 I, ABSTRACT: The developers Kanter- a Assoc,ate5, on behalf of the for, enant, The Wherehouse, is eopeal ng sta•af's, decision in +.anying a proposed amendment to the approved Uniform Sign Program in ,the areas of 'totter size, color, height of sign placement, neon lh.its, extraneous Informational wai3 signs and the design of the monument sign. Staff recaamrends that the Planning Commission uphoWi• the City Planner's denial. - II. BACKGROUND: On March 27, 1995, the Planning Cowission con one y approved Conditional Use Permit 65 -01 for a five acre shopping center. One of the conditions of approval rehired a Uniform Sign Program to �4stabiish crfteria for uniform size, placement, and color of signs for future tenants. On Novsr 24, 1986, staff approved the Uniform sign Program for this shopping center, as Shown in Exhibit "G1" through Exhibit "C111. On November 6, 1987, the developer requested an amendment to the approved Uniform Sign Program Ito 'vary the color, letter size, height and placement and to add an extraneous informational wall u sign Of "+ausic, video and software" fir the major tenant, and to � modify the design of the monument srrrgn. Staff determined the request as inconsi" tent with the Sig (Ordinance, the approved sign program and fire Foothill Boulevard 5p� ific Plans. Therefore, stuff denied the request. = III. RNI,YSIS A. Wall 1. Letter size, The Wherehouse :: =f proposir:g a 30 inch letter Size with the reason that they a,-7e the major tenant in --the shopping. center, � 1 STEM S I r, PLAlHNING COt�tIS�SR�{tt STAFF REPORT - RE: CUP 86-01r ,'APPEAL Page f The aximum letter size established in the sign criteria is 24 inches. \Ibe design standard cf <the Sign Ordinance stated that the dimeneot; of tithe sign, shall be proportionate to and uisuajly btjot ed with tire. size of the building. Staff believed th be 30 inch ie'tter size is out of proportion to the �l ding because the perception of $11,ze is Inver$ y proportionate to distance. F ®r,example( tits 3! i tatter would appear C( ` Much bigger ,-,z 178 fo* away from the sign as in this �Y case, versus feet `away as in the case of lucky sure at Haven Vf` - a Center. Itc other words, this `30 inch sign would oserpower the architecture and seen "gut -of_ �. scare" proportionately , w h the building size. f '. 2. Letter Color. The Wherehouse is proposing a btie : sign l ,py� new lights and a wtti to logo. Another established sign, criteria for the center is the unifo A color ca' Re Plexiglas go. 3383.1 Thist) uniformity in color aids for signs relatingo one another znd also to the building This center is a '�` small 5 acre strip commercial center where "too much. color variation could take away from the architecture wfth the signs being the most doatinartt elestent. The architecture of the building should be the sa—,zf idei►tity and not, the signs.. The LKiform Sign` Progra+� does give ,the *ajor to.nant the- flexibility tip v!te a __ different letter style fray the ,otb4r retail ten& 11 3. Neon/ ,The Sign Ordinance does tint hove provisia� to arT-Qw for neon lights. :Therefore, the proposed n ti light across the aign._ copy of The, WherehWse is inegnrrsteAt with the Sign Ordinance. This issue is currently being studied by Staff aVZdr the Chamber of Commerce aft will be discussed at length latei, < this month. 4. Extrareous Inf­,-mationa'T idagl'. Sic t. The l tarettottse has regttes a iR n on sec : as "music, ._video, software" signs ' lowed as part of Mite wall sign as Shown in Exhibit "DIA. The reason ,is to ptrjperlir identify the store. Ai;3 "er reason i s that Music Plus is a major ccmpetitor of The 'Wherehouse and they feel that they should allot•eii to advertise equably. The Sign Ordinance states that "Si jPtt copy shall °iiicYude atinImal information: only. The use of- :, subordinate information such -as teie ont„ numbers V. t f roducts, information, of produc , - .etc. are disQ;i &_I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: 'CUP 85-01 - APPEAL: January 13, 1.488 The name of the use or the bgbt�es�- shall be the dominant message on the-sign." the Foothill Boulevard j Spec`Ific Plan also has a design provision that prohibits material and product advertising. Therefore; the prroposed additional wall -signs would appeor to be extrafij�igs and not in compliance with the ihtent of the Sign Oi ?rvnance and the foothill Boulevard Spectfic Plan. Last JAugusb 1086, the Planning Commission reviewed a ' similar appeal from lucky r� ore at:: Haven Village Shopping Center, to allow, for extraneous informational wall signs of "Deli, L,i�tor, BakeCy". The,jelanning Ccmission upheld the Ci y P,lanner"t decision ah4— denied, the appeal. The Planning Comk"` ion decision tonight will ag,11n clarify this pr ,3vision bf the Sign Ordinance for future development, in: 'that, approval of these extraneous wall signs would set a precedent for all 'future shopping Deniers in the City. 5. Sign Placement at 22 Feet 'in Height. The Wherehouse,, i sign is placed at approx ma y 2,- feet from the finished grade. The Sio Ordinance stated that all signs cannot be placed above the roof ali #`n ao case be highet, that 20 fee?_: froaa the - finished grade. - _A�turvey,of all the signs within this shopping center indicated that all of the signs are placed within the 20 fewt height limitation except for three which is the Try -out Restaurant,'Beauty � Supply Store, and Merle Normar. Store. These three store frct,6 have a particular problem in that the design of I,r y the store, Trout and roof prohibits any placement of (� sans below 20 feet. (Color photos and /or slides will ? be available at the meeting for your review). B. Monument 5 ,6� Thw developer of this.,shopping center is proposing`°io 'revise the design for the monument sign as shown in Exhibit "D2`: After careful rev, staff dete n d� r nmi a that it is "�-, subs`3ntial'Ltompliance with the approved monument sign in areas of physicO dimensions specifically the width, the height, and the total sign area« However,... .4;�_ design of the sign dopy area appears to ire out ot)J balance visually compared to the one that �r%s approv .1 as shordn in Exhibit "Cle, in that, the area, for 'Ile future tenant sign phase including the large white Plexiglas background dominates the entire mmonumek\ sign. Further, ,t proposed blue sign! copy and red neon l��ht are �t inconsisten ,wf�th the Sign Ordinance and sign prograr. J .' 6-3 C — PLAN8M Ot 1ISSI011 STAFF RE061t -i �1 RE: CUP 85-81 - ,A1*PEAL Jaruary 13, 1988s o V _ IV. REi7lR7C�ri+1'YZ ti 00: J�.ii :�w WeeL(iL PI anni'qg CQi$5o1i e y Pianne a decision to' deny the proposed amendant to t "e f' 11n PrograX r Cuc Village Shopping Centrr Wand G direct s$atff to a Resolution Menial findiais for PrePa of with adoption a the next g.' l es u 8.-aii� er -Cnty P near sa :IIF ko c Attaclments: 'Letter frost Applicant ;s No,sOmber 23, _M? Latter'of Dental A, ,Exhibit V = ukation, PAP ..' Exhibit *BK - lotailed`;5ite Ptai��' Exhibit wC" �- roved Si 9 rn Pro" rat o Exhibit "D" - Proposc4 AM Idsents to thO Si, Progralk _ J I i i C � n AMOCIATES SF€QPPING d.d'N'EIOWEL EIS'€' November 24, 1987 Ms. Beverly Autheleg, City,,Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. o. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9,'i30 Re: 9950 'West Foothill Boulevard, Unit U -0 C.U.P. No. 35 -01 — o Dear Ma Autheleg: on behalf of our prospoc, hive tenant, Wherelious_e Snterta* ten t, , Inc., we hereby appeal the decision of your >slanning �`aff` regarding signage as stated in their le rt,_4 dated No.Yembe ,-t3, 1987 (copy attached). �{ "The Wherehouse"' has lease a 6790 square oot area a`, the above- referenced location, s a � ma o _-tertant 4ith over 210 E stores throughout CalifaZaia, 14x ` asiingtons Nevada and Colorado and has a registered trademark. Pursuant to Exhibit l A, Section 6, of the Rancho Cucamonga Village Sigh Criteria, ?; approved November 24, 1985, sae exercise our right to official review of "The-'w—,—rehouse" wail iign Enclosed is our check No. Oil in the account of $52.00 to c ver the appeal process fee. ,please inform us of the first availab e i date to be put on theme Planning Commission Agend! K -, Your assistance in this ° matter is greatly appreciated, aid we look forward to the acme pleasant working relatsoAship We have enjoyed throughout the development k-nd construction of our G shopping center. Should you require further information,,please feel free to bcntact mC%at M4) 592 - 4337,. Very truly .yours, S JArice M. Taylo Project Manager J JMT :jvs A� ,;�`c3osures A`) > `` cc: Bette Al.bala, Vi6rehcuse tntnrtainment, Inc. 6"3Vi Attf ry1 I4ye SAh1 v1 , f'A 'il% * (818) 914 -ASM * (714) M4337 � T 39 N i 7449 Scout Avewe , BMl Cao ' CaldbMin 802111 Ph�?nsi�r (2131 927 -4701. 773 -8 2 (714) 523•I S SP- Dec, ax 2 �. . City of Rancho Cucamonga- ctcii�.:- Cify,.PLimping Depart. .Flt , . G°7'Ir OF FA"FGHD C:tY.',w:viiCil:,: . P,.1). `Box gp7., r*,ichq Cucamonga, Ca ',.9173E .. Ants. , , N Dear hs. FR,-r= rJ This is a addendum to th , letter of appEeeallsub, ._tted on behalf of '"Thi Nherehouse ", by Kanter and, AssQcf +es. :r Rebuttal to city derittl 1. 24" vevsus 30" letterlt { ;end; prd will grant', e Wherahousa" an, exemption to 4he - - 240 height restricts ti because of their major Tenant r status and their larg sign band and extended sto:<s frontage.,' ? � 2, Red pIPV \faces Vti�rsu t blue pl)px faeear(1,-. Exhibit' `", ' :.n the city'--, kpproved center ign program e.:- c_iddes the major tenant Erbla both letters ��yV'e and the rec ple�x fad co, 3. additional Verbage - City- has'approVncl addit.ional,verbace in th4 pest and,,th, client feels it is esseirtial' in erly izfdentifing their store. Examples of other busiras with verba:ge are, Si^zler Stem House, (Steaks, _,SeafoC'--1.i Sa�ads) a and kusi,a +, (Vidso, ;o act Discs), special note ehqulci tie made that Music + is `-,c� major cbmppititor of *The Whep�4.oui;e ", and they _ _ feel' they should b"- loved to adve�:tise equally.' 4, Neon Bolt The bolt is a widely recognized logo and inborpo;:ated in all of "The Wiherehouse "a "_. print and° t+eleviwion a?vertising. Wherehouse feels th%%,, bolt is essent�,al In,, for proper s..vMe cn � Ms. Nanvy,:FoSr� _) •, 4 - ;� fly ?age` 2. p :December, 2, 1957 ,, } r Sho«n3.d tlere be any, mestions or coa n� glea�e�teeli(�, re to contact myse'l jam.. Camma .Marshall .. v � Gl � n. Sinderely, f f _ t r ! - 0 12 (51 Q �._ • u +mot :) _ i a. E.... ..... IV ^MY OF, RANCS'Q'C6CAMl?A!!'iA J movember -Z o J987 v Jan Taylor* E Kantor a Asioclates 628 yVeSt, Arrow �Fy�i�yrt+at�+ a' SUBk'T; PflOPOSM MWMT SYGk FOIL- C A1683 iil�t i. ,lt FUG UTPE 1 wEilt iSE" ICE1P Dear Ms. Ttytao-. rfar :16r OC'i- VOrSatiaR at::fe # 14finirrg GOUntRr On ter or . f 9�T 'fit `�VSS`" d ,.hderStsndfng that your prosges.,tir€j tancfit, *Z Khgrahwml Ch sips to gursut thG prdpaSOd o'ft 1kil s1p and atant#e � U SU itted orgy Number B, ����. t �# E Staff haS, deti�+ea� that'dgat� are`j�iS.t th fie.._ current �;r; s � ,gn Ordi eeanut rdpArarsai i4s! Itka�1 aS ows; ��. A. Montaen si rt;' - is Sly substtial cc►� ise �ritF fire apprarad F. �pn�ert S 9n i�ra areas ��", t��+SidS► di�n�it�s sf�icaY'iv, s ? �, ` width,., fi�yt, a►rs# thea ;f8�rea, e'.: the �feSin 1! of the , 111 caiZy ;arga, apl to .tie out of 'balance- ,vitugly; , co"ared t* Qua thl tt W43, a0p..., red,' in thati the rve� br � i"utur tetanir, fop 3rac�adf n0 tea , 1 arga ads§ ke r baclsqunti dorsr,�tes the,.r�s �adnentigr air prepared !' /� Sfgrr _�rp,� and tR� rud ;��,�n'- `'�i�SC at'� incar��ia�:�ri� +��'�i►� �r�tsJ�`..� , i�. Kale signs. _ �r ~ L. en'e res in iev r ",OZS IS M ve ", the prop "i % < ! a. The coiar of the' Sign . 42283 �erx�as ~tie #rrapased blue, 3. ;bra' "Musics Sofaa°e" �!idnrrt l/� eXtrcnea►..a info, �ticn rdr 4 are ±�$ r iity@4.; a�CCGCdi C the sir =`Ordi ri�il'�l. 4 y I�IS��gQ�b�F�:�i .. -,.�- Yerwq:. ? 'me TOO 4t411�, � Y 1 z �•• � _ - Ca4F[.GCfatilhyl� w i _ 9 o GCJ .. ` M i j G r1Pt ^till F • s "' _ 1C ti f "L { FEW t i� NOM Ali �PLA NN.�t�,t', yvtm, -'"---'---. r ! j Qtl�1k3N�h ANiNIiL)� \ L"t �; ! ;i { b9NQ IVon3 OHONVII asxvcaos�� a�sxseex cur _ `¢ I { fi/' � - � 1�_.._• Rai L � , 114 64 •bit oll �{ � l _ i _ FLANNINTG �xriIS:t I VIS O A9 J,ar OVAL 1 CtIY GF RAN RANCHO CUCAMONGA VILLAGE, 31 CRITERIA ,ti__ a . A. GENE r. rA is c w c u: n rs o is a AUK 06 1996 p' a g rRCt'ie Frowning Dwsion w dry �. Within l aav�' i� aj ! a�# ihi �l9 c�tfontenant Iii c rQ °�+nant shall submit or,�cause to be submittal t r approval, PrI tG fabrieatian, 49Ur (43, copiers of data led ` c drawine!e indiaztin% the IOCation, SI:O. IAlva�i�t. „ffiPeCificatlons and mstmod of �ittacnment. 2 Within 15 daces of -li;t Ord 's approval, tenant shall ubnit ar cause to bier submitted to the �Ci-tlr of Rancho CUcaman a P, fining Deaa&'.1ment.. for approval, oriOr ''ta fakrrication-: 2 copse of;, landlord s aasaraveSd Plan with all iifo:^matiton as no-cod Bove. v Alin permits for s20ns ono tnelr, instailat£ -mn ash ill e obtaineo by l icenssoO sign contr c;tor at the tenant%. *Rooms*. 111,11 4. All approvet4 signs shall .trig constructmd and` instaelll d a t 6he temmn'4 s ex"onse within 60 rays of tenant °s lease ,comfil't ceaIMont or receipt of .approvals which is,; latrar. f 5. All signs sh&il 4R rVViaie.ei xor Conftrmar:Cp With this criteria and Overall :design gctaRtty. L�of4armanCo with 'jhi3 si�3n 'criteria shall be riSaroutsly versfor!Ceed and an •; non -= conforming coigns wit) be removed at tona<nt's expeneat upon 1"[ oaysa priOr written nctice. 6. Tenant s.N911 be respt;+nsiblii for he snsttal2ation an maintenancs of tenant's" "sign by Iiee�ne,�;i sigax tNrh�fracta> ^., Shaul -d rr tenant s sigh require maintenance t;;r reasalni:r lanuaiorcl shall gii�e tenant 3t? day wri�tOn noticee to eeffect said maicstenancee a ree��ir•. Should tenant fa =1 to do sama%`�tardlard r►ay undrwta�rf ���p#irse ae�ri tea (10) da-cvs froaee, date of ir' cacm. tlus interest at -thaa maximum rate ailowchlsa. t U B. PFcIMARY SIGN ;7pSCIFICATIQNS (reference kttached get exhibits)` I. Tenant s'!gns shal'I tie individual roan channel Iette�v with solid metal backis and sides. Letters shall be constructed frzm 22 gauges oh E ;et :metal and.' shall be °i" deter. c, Ca Letter interior* shall o :'fit reflection. caanteo white enamel Oar eveh` light s ss 44. Letter a :ztersar•s tretrirns) !shall be P>i gted min.'�Z Goats `semi- gloss automotive acrylic +eraameel Over Primesr underccaet: Color , shall be Ditcltr 0376V cream (vellow —�-kge) or 7- 1746- C --eWam �..p {ormulaA no. 71�349iTbE; ,*. S. Letter retalners shall be 3/411 rind Jewg,lite( brand to -jm cam with 07 Phillip typm e"&1nz'ng sGreas pa,snted red ta;.nsats;h. :' amity of Rancho Sign Permit Cucamonga Ap , icatior GEMEMo: t0aw. rig 0 Name of ostablishmdnt Date' f 'dress .L°Sul Ee! sJi Applicant's Name Address Z c'3WNIMS C FICA ice; w '� Z Owner'a Name �ll'I�r�B �� °i' rgnatwe Q Addres `-? rrncle.� �. r Number and type n_f -sign {sl, Temporary . Wall MOnur ;yt Canopy Subdivision ' .endow _>r— Uniform Sign grogram Dlracdonai Pedestrian Z Z Other Uj Size: t _Length VIdth Depth Overall Height e�Sq.._F @ldg. Face $4, Ft. Sign FE n� __ t--� _ �R�_... •C l i Signor , LU Sign 3. U_ tltaila Sign d. 1Za. "M) k' Uj �- ® Sign S• ---- } Sign S. _ .r If wmporary or subdivision, date of installation If temporary or, ;bdivision, date of expiration 2 Cash depoilt amount 0 Indlcs o sign copy, stze, color and materlals an plans desedbed an the attached sheat4.. PHOTW Ap / Oenled I w Date: Carrowlentar rr Yde. ' FILE Nt. r I � s OVAL Cltl OF Rr I¢ r Rancho Cuce pn5a Vil lara Cr:ter�i [, {:.. C EO= R Rtc t!A ;JC %fitvNG A A 061986 ;;!,450 Contact' -•'3 Ptar."" :tj 0J.."S+ot1 at �\ 0714" 5cf3- t£ "5j . for frost tnSpeGpeit 0 '11�;a���lui�lll�a3(4l5 � Qnlq�as Letter facras sshal l o 1 /en 4iOno flat•' sur+acvx as manufaci;�red by Remm and Haas. or atpRroved 'ecu�4 7. Lot +.tar illunt,n*ti= shall.he 13 millimeter. CIO neotl'glas3s S "' on center Or lee# and 30 tas.11iar,4 . 5. 30 mat. high raaaser -Factor iraMviormers shall be used. r L; :nousangm wall be used +'rsr All neon tube sv*r_6M inscallit one. �z 1C. Ali;. sign %tatters ishall'3?R sracured,by Concealed +asst- veers. stmlhimss Steal or n cxel Or ca e. dlRi'e u a i�t ed and e in R aed r ''- the bagk9round 1/44, to allow water— runqeF. p '�_ rat < A� 11. NO exposed lames or t0bing will be permitted. ti 12. No audible", flashing, at, anim*ted ans will to oermi kted 13. Elkmtrical servile to all sags- +,c shill' be on tenant's meter. s 14. No exposed racewa3 +s, c eefaera~rs or COMB it will no permitted. 15. All Ponetratsrans c,c the building' ,structure reauirerd for sign installation shall un, walled t�! t# Water tight condition and small 3a paetehel match , djakcant- 4xrr.u4h. lh. No sign company lit �els avitx, be perfwittvd on the exposed sufaes of su "tans erespt" tho3e- r°equirad by Underaritker's,,�,.at awatariss W.L.I. which shall be pl;aced' in an location. C. DESIGN FtEQUIPteMIENTS i. %etter style aN:I1, -be a Choice of "Raleigh Rutra Bold " and,or "Souvenir G6mi —BOld" 'e—Mn l etrasfet. Exsa:0-1e is ae'C�atrh :d` hereto _ =• Letter size•; are s 'Followsz - a. Maxim 'n letter height` i* 241' � b. Minimum Idtiter height is 38 -" c. t�aa mum sir ' :dth 9ha.l 1 -lot oxcot rr: x'07, of ls{aste�t �. sF�.C�reTro;�t rvf'dCh, � Tinged szsrn1Y all qe restrscts�d to the vcttadliftheq, busirmcs S name atnd or`t Cluc�y 0,. �tre. »vac+s�� t9r€�y�dealr : N*,, fi��rMr�?�!i�g- -erne oroauci; grants will be,nermlrise. F:.amoles of 41acraptable tvpe bF+llnssas'r�rr "ea: fa$haons. "Otastic'Gne Hour, rC;ata r VAL. _ kanc'sua Cucamonq.a 5tillikse Sigh Criterlig By �T AA MA 1 Q "r r Y o Fe iq` �3 C t! C tit rah 4T Paed54 G � /� •5rnir(7 .i �.g,t�nad R. M„a�ior esmaAak sal Iialao over S,Wc= sau4re feet Of I*AK4e0. ,410*r area and is part of a5 chain e'wi'th 5- or more, sttsrwr locations ° arer examated froar_ the letter sttyl requira moat"nd4is sub$ ect to an ividual ravile ,bY c , y p ann ng s off. 6. In the event of a miniasu* storefront width where a "tenant - s name is long, and wif not' fit within minia`um site .guer deline as outlined herezo. The secondary .copy aiay ne two.,lime's in hoight. however. thee ,total copy height of thee lines shall measure °$„" from ` the tap of thee!'.fi:rsC lino to the ocsttCm #f o her 6,seeeond litreeALs'' �.1�" \ b. P.Aimary ppHus secondary Cif any) co,�y shacll.; bexcsgrt+ai* horizontally and'Vorticaally: in taenA6t'u sign .aareaissk. D. 14INDON AND DOOR STON SPECIFrCA FIONs For purposed of s<t49ra identi"ficatioet, hers of husin"t. eanaergmnc telepho ", aatc+ -= genant may ftlaa . 0 on ar►tr�ae� ace door (s# not M_o than ik+4 squaree- Y;che�e of, whits 4inyl- aiae-ii 't, gold Aaaef oi. application IWttawiA-. Ihdivi# al letter, hr.lgE►t 7!a ,fo$ ;ICY +trzepetse! . 2 ". Additional window Oraphirm *11 be sUb j,ect to landlord's G ' approval, E. DSSIGNA'TFD SItiRi !:O(+fiRe?CI`t7F'. I 1. In order: ro� � siirr+izee the cost of signing to the teesniujt' �� to insures safe a%ad�*Str gu i:ty WOr, rrahship and `pPiateer• ails, and i�Ci' t` i further provide �Qr t;,btfor*ity, tiaee *andlqrd has d�j�s igna&erci tttee 401lowin� sign coatih,jctor ws .ham ��o�egY �sgrs contr I:to. -: t' 'Superior ISkec�?� i eT' Advertising, tree . 1700 W. Anatba'im, St. Long Beach, 90813 ct f L fj 1' AFTNs Mark A.'krant, 37 995 -9356 r f Al ------- -- - r f R Y 1 Ic 10- c� I a i e ! <, :." = a �� y�V ; �.•. Ls�w , r _ .» G soft o LU 4c N s 4 Ic, J L o J A ti c .rG w�ili YaM •.s ;� \.. .ww..r �'a1`"{+ ^` �..Y i.�w�r+Y' ' p ao Ri�yli�r11 V r:+ 1� V Lu tL =jt(f ti V 111 I& Ark ti #owl AMU C%1. "N AIRL t Zet ARMI, t SIM rr j 0 :> + 2V•� �•L: .�i tags _1 t i C �t i F IC a -/0701-02 1 -13.88 PC Agenda 4, of 4 _, r+ i f4t-. { i; I � A ��. i s ` c� �r If, 1 z w j 1` � yu { • 7, (�-� �i�� K� = b �r two �� x 1� '+ i HM i `ff a,+% art '* ✓ Y g..,. � R"` tn Eza _ 1 �4'--—� Q t f t Y ► WA W-r NOM , x l tnus ' o u