Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/02/24 - Agenda Packet/0701-02 0 2 -24 -88 PC Agenda Of 4 ary, 0P r v t .,J PM KING, CO 9 E- c GET TEA WE, bi mAY F,EBRUAX'i,,'4, 1988 7.01) p.M.. ... Li .. , PAM COMA[ 1iI` Y Caw��R 10161 Sm 14M mwftV icuq" c.dSaoi aj 1`fJiiVA� J. P-Ifte of Allqome Commissioner Htske4ey w, Commissioner -Emeriek Commissioner Chide. Commissianer\h istel Commissioner Announeemaists ff. I' A6mvaj of `dAfatittaa � Febrmy 10, 1988 �'. Comet Ling The fb v* Co�€ ent Calendar o r items are expected to be roatine ;and non - controversial, They 1tl be acted on by the Commission at one time without xifs��tssion. .� anyone has concern over any m,, it u should be,removed for discusston. �5 A. RJ� 90LIJTION UP APPROVAL 'RELATIVE TO SP't SACK REDUCTION FO3 EH 1RONMI ARUINCE TAL ASSHSSMENiT APiD 7-15 BARMA;fIAAN - A reougst to reuce'te f required 65- foot Iandseape setback arA the requirrdr,45 foot Ian6aaile io 45 feet a1001; Arrow route setback to 85 feet aibng Vineyard Avenue € f approved Tiaet 11784 consisting of 98 ; tOwi;�onses on 8.5 acres of land!,; hi the .-dedium ResiOnt;W r District , (8 -14 4welitV units per 46re),;1ocat t the tnor'tfswes�t 4' CornEV,af Arrow Route and Vineyarri Avenue 4PN-. - ,2117.198 -01 through 88. gift p t+ p B. REWLU K TION:0 DENIAL X2: E TO THE GUEST PARK PACE RE -MMIM request to, fewkw " 913 -eat lug'.. aw, t to 20 paWrldng spac6N%mw Tract 117M townhouses on 8.5 #"orss� d pooskt* m� moillum AWL&W -ilygelung t Ita r"Ce" Wa,��sd at ttt� poreq 64 CIC f Arm Route and Vtoeygrd. Avenue AM. 2"17-1$241 til �;'Ihom w SNYMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Pon I)EVELbPMENT REVIEW VelOPT116at �oftft 2 6 square feet on 8.4.1 Of ei' It DiStrict, S&erea 8 of the tr* WW on tb� west side of 24-4 f4k ItMet, betwaft Jarbey 8QU*.vj" and MOM C&trtt - AP14 20944244. V1, pole A;�, The folfov*4iterps k-�x "jq'h0dri%-s in which oontelmd kdNIdmA t*'Qy'�Vce the the related i t. �l it be rei6 flad, by the 01a i'r-aO, n, and address_ the Cbm� t�n,byj�u Mid Ciddroft Ah �ach Ofn -Mll be l(m(t#d to S mimtes per Indh for ea Ct. t 1). MOPIPMA110M 010MONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL 0-W MSSMAGM --A-" VA 31, PARCI� �m to I ,the Cond rov _R�U_16M_thel t ._i Street for ) to -development t) of an Indillstr related Parcel, Maps JnAhe general Wal i trIct 2) located on, tha,nRizsast odiner of Vineyard'Avstiiva Street -- APN: 20"1211T, 24A 21-1 E, QONDITIONAI, USE 8845 - CALVARY CHAPEL - A r u at to e bj:a efg4jih- of flee and Sun4y SaiRf -Ma jeeso�j et within an park on 4.9,1a 0 e space of 1,280 fe Io Ge ral lm',IuAtrial District (Ummea 4) loeate(I aeres of land in no at the oUth sdde.of 7th fteet,'eA3t of Archbald Averue -API�; 20.0-211-36 and 41' . F� ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDMONAI _�e on via P�� Street G. x ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMnNT AND CONDITIONAL USE PE 1VI�- post to estAbi�► a �chi�°�rsetie ciitt' in a lensed space o 6, J1 Square feet within a multi-tenant industrial center in the Industrial Park Dlitrict (Subarea 6) located at $628 Utica Avenue �APN: 209 - 145 -18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSMMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE Pi itM'l ii - TRADITIONAL A` M Ri QA9 KARATE Tfie request to estabilij a karate wbbol in a Iea" space, oif 3,$46 -square Feet within an eu# ting multi - tenant ind,,Wrial center in the enaral Industrial Mitrict (Subarea 2) located at 9667 Arrow , �ot*te = APN; �QB- p1Zri9r I. ENVIAONMENTAL ASSF,MSP,fENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAT tAAd NDm 1 - CITY 65 Ii C_ 0 CUCAMO GA -- ;; A?ropoaal to amend tha viotori& Community text to require a Conditiojfak Use Permit for shopping centers and certain commercial uses. J. ENMONMEN`l"AL ASSESSMENT AND TEiti%A VISTA " CLtd4MtTNiTY LiN1iYI - GICTX`�J RAIiCIi(3 CUCAMONGA - AID m to am #o atner€d r� Vist�,CprttmunIV -a Ia�s text-to require Condit! U Pe for ahc�i� ce�4ers and rertaain c?mmeroia,l 'uses. 1C K. ETR18'P NA 4E CHANGES FOR TERRA VISTA PARK ANTI ,L NU - A prop03R1 to Yie8i nsya jtrm Ista war �81!+ West and Tarr ►vista Parkways East and to designate 1cst l i Avenue for a k �4i,ior arterial 4W a eoUaotolr street: respectively, within the FAannedZommunityr. Terra 4k'sta +CI3aiE Bushwo L. 'TME EXTENSION E;)P. TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - CRISTIANO 1 custom lc t residential stab Ivision of 16, ,lbts on epprt x4it*_elyr ` 35 acres of land In the Very Lave Residential Mtriot (leas than 2 n 'dwelling units per acref, located on the east side of Haven .: `north avenue, off,tho, HBJside Drainage Channel �- APN: 201 -'121-\ a. ` eentint2d f *t3 aanureryr 27,1688 VOL Ifew , V. ENVIRONMENTAL AS`3IM&MENT ANTI DEVELO MlaI7'1` REVIEW, . 8 �5 - EitiJi?:7N L ! TMAN - We devela* ment o " ,ive (SY f ' InOUsi ' triu1%dist i . tion bull tote 423,827 s square feet on 22 acres of land in the General Industrial district ( ven U) located at the southeast oorner of 6th Street and Wffn_ Ia ",Av6wA* AIL APNs" 220-,263-10 through lit }PPRAY, OF TREE R.gMOVAL pl?,itMrr 88-03- PRA R, -An � ' I al of r C3} '�tery hors itesideatial. #iisi�i�s° �"��tt i.c� #i� ,� �� ;��az ae�} ics��ed r tl. Isi�VET.bIPME�V"i` RE f 8f-45 F.it313lifi+uA^FCyN - C4.1PF33i - A Ya mify►a 7ition o� �tiraih� Fiat's .zt of an rn- &ezt £aa or the mute ��F:d c 1 d of exist -C overhead utilities alo Beryl �r�t � �;` i�pod medical o#fiez huildh* at the soaa eat �rr�0r �t � Zc}�e stow and Beryl Street: - lmx. 208 -� 3 ',x0. -M, SON' XTAI, AS F`SMEN A..40 ftE'VET40I*ENT kBViEN "3 = 'off iF_ �Vllopmdnt �a arc " t aRi'iC8it3C I Fs]srct turd adminiatrativebuil bW on. I.�.�4 t SCk4J6 fl taaad' iR Heavy I1ad[astrial District* &*arsa is, located �JI at the soot% Sid i Arrow RM4 , east of 1-15 AM �28-12, -3g. Q. ij E IWSON Tp yA,'. .,._ R� RM j6l R.: POTENTIAL Pdt�bIE+IO �iTTtyNB 'O THE r�AN�D USE . t}'�I3��lNS U`B TH 1�ITaII R L_ _EC. I,As: U 13 _ARqA S. TRAh S COM�11 "ElIR 3it2!1dIN aATIYS l&a.0 ; iTE 3N ,Q .�.� T. IFSB DETEkMIKATIOR 89-01 - F1,AXft -e)P1 - 0, x t to deierin that the per, use, Mann adtoi*, of 6last4c bottles, be clsssiffed as light jnacatafaetur aag. �p 1+i6117{N1A1:mai /+i"4LiRrt - C� %••` ,•�� i cs. � �. �xKc �amlrs�i'ha This ;.is file UM0 0114 thie,gonprar public is address the Commfssion. ItOrs to, be dis&wed here are the which do not already appear on afs agenda. M Ad„jwnx in"t T7ae plarm in# C�iirami zso t adopted Admit istratiwe Regulations that _ set a;*a ,' I p.m. Odjouerament Wne. Ip items go beyond Jiaat timer they shalt be hezrd y twr-,% the �clNuent or the CommlWon. i � ,a � TM C-TUSTIANOICOMPANY Ftbruary 24, 1988 Mr. Brad Bu2-1,qw City of Rancho Cttcamonga 9340-C Baseline Road Rancho Cucazongal, Ch. -41730 SUBJECT-, Time'Extension for Tentative Tract-1283k Dear fir. Buller- Upon receipt of '' yory staff report of F@bruary 24*,,U�68 rega;ding the lubject, matter and pursuant,7+10 our telephone conversation regardinGr stAffOsi requirement f&- an additional Um (2) weeks of tibie needed for "review, -wti�beteby concur with ycur opinion and"adree �bat th*gl addition4l time vhoul&- be provided to staff,. If we can be 6f eziy further ass! ance -or help to c�arify" any matters, pl4r,�se fe--1 free to cont t me. sincerely, TILE CRISTIANO COMPANY Robert G om r DOC; 151-A.,Buller/T1m6 Ut. 4),(7&0101 4 t, Mluin��d�. "Office SoxS2i0,Xmpqtt BeAch,CWhmta(�,�658 0 Q CITY OF RANCUO CUCAMONGA STAFF, REPORT f� - DATE., Februarys 24 098& 46 iz T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission W7 �� FROM: Brad Buller,, City planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL RELATIVE 10 $. MACK REDUCTIONS FCR } r- !I request re ce a required toot setback to . feet along Arrow Route and the reouired 45 foot landscape setback to 35 feet along Vineyard Avenw fur t approved 'tract 11734 consisting of 98 townhouses of. 8.5 � acres of laid in the Medium Fesidential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest .corner` of Arrow Route and` Vineyard Avenue_,- AFN 201-192-01 thr^LCJt" 92� EZWittAWN PUK WYMUMNTAL A55"MENT AND YIAIAKE 67+19 BARKWI AN BAR req►ias o . re uce a fiec�u rp guest par ng spares try 0 parking spaces to approved Tract ' 11734 "' consisting y9$ townhouses an 8.6 acres � land in the Medium Res�c#ential District CS 14 dWalling idnits per acrel- Li.ated at the northwest corner'cf Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue - APN 307 -192 01 through-98. I. BACKGROUND: Lin February 10, 1988, the Planning Commiss!on con uc e s p blic heariv -9 to receive input on the proposed setback ' and parking variances associated with Tract 11.734. Upon concluding the public hearing, the Planning Commission determined that there was justification to allow a reduction In tte building :setbacks to that which was originally permitted v e't the prrrject was approved in 1981. However, the Planning Commission could not support the tari,ance for the guest parking spaces based upon co wns expz -essed by existing homeowners. As a result, the planning Commission ;directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval for the setback !variance and a Resolution of Denial for the parking variance. II. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Commission adopt the a ac to espliutions. Re a fullyuomit: City ,.niter B9:SM:te Attachments:. Resolution of Approval for Sel,back Reduction Resolution off Denial for, Guest Parking Space Reduction �i�� C ITEMS r & $ RESOLUTI[rtt iav:= n A RESOLUTION QF, THE RA WCNO Ci��,�;�GA PLANN)NG Ci?MISSION � APPROVING A PMfION OF VARIANCtE NCB, 87 -1,9 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 55 FOOT LAiYDSCAPE SFT4AC� , TO 45 FEET ON ARROV ROUTE AND THE REQUIRED Ors FOOD SETBACK TO 35 FEE* ON sI f. VINEYARD' AVENUE foR AppROYED TRACT 1175.4 CONSISTING OF 98 TiiTe MUSES ON $.5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MMIUR RESIDENTI& DISTRICT (8-1 DWELLIM UNITS PER ACRE) :'LOCATED AT THE NORTWEST CORNER 'OF &IROW ROUTE AND VINEYARD AVENUE APN: 207 - 19241 THRoLiMi 95. A. Recitals. (i) Andrew Barmakian has 'fled an application for the issaance`of the Variance No. 87 -19 as describEtl In the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance regy*st ix referred to as the�`appi icat {,on , (10 On FebruarY 10. 1988, the Planning Commission of 0 C4ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice* public hgaring,on the application and concluded raid hearing on.thaj..date. ha All leyal,:prerequisit )8 to the adoption�'of this Resolution ve occurred. B. Resolution. NOii, THOEFORE," It, is hereby found, determined and resolved by ttre Planning Canrpission of the City Of Rancho Cucarnpnga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that�all of ther facts set f?rth yin the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented tc -',-4 s Commission during the above- referenced public ,hearing on February IO ��?� Including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speCificaily finds as follows; (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corned of Arrow t?oute and Vineyard Avenue which is presently partially improved with tor+nhome units; and (b) The propertj. c the north, east and west art designated for multi- family residential uskis.- The property to the north and east are developed with a townhome and condominium project respectively. The'property to the west is vacant, The properx *y to the south is designated for industrial h uses and it deveogped with a multi - tenant industrial "park; and d i':'NMIMG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. V41MCE 87-19 SETBACK REDUCTION., SARMAKIAN -February 24., 198$ Page R ,f (c3' The application is designed to facilitate the completion Of a 88 omit townhome project on 84 acres of land previously approved under Tentative Tract 1173#, Such an action as conte�rgatedQ irr aq;yur�etlgn with the applications, tonfom to the General Plait of the City of Rancho Cuca>agnga and IS a per6itted use within the 140dium Residential Oistr;ct* and. NJ The application has been submitted to allow a reductinl!in the streetscape setbacks within said Tract 11734 contrary, to the requireaents Of Section 17.08.040 of the city of Rancho Cucamonga' pevelopmant Code G requiring a streetscape setback of 55 meet along special boulevards (Arrow -' Route) and a streetscape setback of 45 feet along secondary arterials (Vineyard Avenue); and (e) The variance as specified in the application will not contradict the - .goals or objectives of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan vi, Development Co% and will not promote a detrimental condition to the persons o,,.> property in the immediate vicinity of the subject site for the reasons as t follows: adoption of the City of Rancho, Cucamonga Tract Develop was approved Friar tc the g Development ;ode; and , .. { } The preWously darveloped pertinn of the site., has streetscape setbacks of 45 feet Along Arrow Route which is the saw r;-that being requested by the applicant; and (3) There are existing street improvemenii Within the - northern and -eastern portions of the site that were inst4jled based upon the previously approved Site Plan. These improvements, in their prtsent location, restrict design alternatives to rtet the current Code requirekOts, :evidence 3. Based upon the nbstantial presented %o this Commission during the aboveareferencod A�° ,#gearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragragf 1 and 2 abova, this COMMI01-nn hereby finds and concludes as follows (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enfgrt, tent of the specified regulation wi"pld result in practical difficulty or vnoacessaiy physical bardshf� Inconsistent with the objectives of the Development code (b) That there are exceptional or extrsordinar circumstances or conditions applicable to property involved or to the intended cse of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same districts (c) That strict or literal itterpretation and enforcement of the spp�:Yifitd regulation would deprive the applicant of by pa•ivileges en gyed the owners of other properties in the sash district. A - ".t Pl,f�1�NC C ISSIDN RESCtI.i�TIQN No. VARIANCE � 49 SMACK RECUCTIUN - 1AKIAN . 1 a �ehruary, 2988 Page, 3 'i d} that thA, gra'ntIng of, the' Varie ce w11 1; not 11 constitute a grant of special privilege inconsisij�nt, '-. fft' with the lt3itatiohs w')ther properties ciAssif1w a 1 ✓' ` in the SiA* district. e1 at thi ;granting 4f the Variance will i�not 'ba etrimental to the_ ;public health, safety, or wotfart, Or Mate4al'l� injurious to properties or Impeov tints in the vicinity. #. Based upon the findings tend coclusipns set forth in ;paragraph 1, 2 and - 3 above, ` this -o issiors h reby r Oproyes ;the application subj�t to each and every condition set forth bslow.,f S. The Deputy Secretary to this commission shall certify to the adoption of V*. '� Resolution. AP uco NO ADOPTED THIS 24T1t DAY OF FEBRUARY,'1988, PLANNING Ct1FklISSIUN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWJN4l4 BYE Carry T. HERR, rflairman ATTd�. I, Brad Buller, Deputy /Secretary of. the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fRregoing Resolt� ion was duly, and regularly Introduced. pa;f�ed, and adopted by the- Planning Cowession oi:' the City of Rancho Cucam ga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Eommissf'on held on the 24th day of Febria y, 1988, by the following Vote-to-wit., AYES. Cl>M1FlISSIPA' RS. NOES: CDFfiISSiF�BRS. ABSENT: CtiMISSIDNE -M. RESOLUTION NO. `1 -r "r A RESOLUTION OP THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING comNISSltiN ci a DE%iYING' A PORTIOM ,OF VAPIANCE NO. 87-19 TO 9EOUCE THE { RE -UIRED 24 GOEST PARKIN SPACES Tip 20 PARKING SPACES .FOR APPROVED TRACT 11734 COWSISTM- OF 98 TOWNHOUSES ON 8 5"- ` 3i ACRES OF LAW) IN THE MEDIUM 1 MENTIAL DISTRICT (2iN" I DWELLINf '.JilITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARRO14 ROUTE' AND ,MkNEYA APN- 207-192-01 THROMH 9Q, ,i A. Recitals. tip Andrew RarmaRian has Filed an appltuat�c issuance of the Variance W�oN :7419 as described itt tho title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Atsolution, the subject Variance request is rci�erred to as "the application" �I (ii) on February 'lo, 1988, the Planning'Commmissionoof the C14 of Rancho Cucamong2conducted a duly noticed publie.earing cn the application and concluded said hearing on "at dote,- (iii) All legal, prergquisites to the adoption of this , es#r tiwn have gccureed, NOW, THEREFORE, %fit is hereby found, determined and resolved by the plannimg Commission of the Ci1Or of Rancho C,�camanga as follows: � 14 This C,s ission herb 's; C g4 11y finds that .aft of the facts set forth fin the Rccltals, Part A, of this Re�'Igt;on are true and correct,. 2. presented to tvs sson t 4 during the above- referbiced , ublia hearing cp- February 1% 1988, including written and oral "staff reports, together ,.with public testimo this Commission hereby specifirt:lly finds es i'oilows� ' a (a) The application applies ko property located at the" northwest corner of .Arrow Route and Vineyderd` Avenue which' is presently Partially 1wroved with tOMY,6me units; and (b) The Property to the north, east and west are designated }. for multi- family residential uses. The property to the north and east'ar,e developed with a townhome Bind condomir.ium project respectivei . Thi property to the „west is vacant. The property to the south is designated for industrial uses and is developed ~loth a multi -te,,q >� industrial part:; and tt T ___ 7 ..� PLANNING G"ISSION RESOLb`CION NO. VA 87 -19 PARKIK SP'ACEJEDUCTION a 3AMIAN February 24, 1988 r` Rage 2 \\ (c) The application is designed- to facil�iata: theat+pletion Of a 98 unit townharme project ort 8.6 acres of land previously approved un Tentative Tract 11734 ;. and €d} ae ailglication hds been submitted to allow a roeuctioo in the number of open .rest pa +�' Ing spLces within said Craft I173+E contrary to` the requirements =aiF Sectiomi 11.12,640 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requiring one west for parking space every fouh units- and te1 1e vafiance as specified In the application will contt-adfct the goals or ob44ctives of the Rancho Cucamonga General plan and Development Code and will promote a detrimental cond,tion to the persons or property in the i+eaediate 'vicinity of the subject site for the reasons -� follows: as " (2) The demelopment was approved with 26(('foot ~aide private ` s trsets, the minimtam width allowed tq,�,_Asure emergency vehicle access. With this street width, no on- street perkikils pormitted. If ad* ate oft-street parkirig is not provided, residents and Vests my pai in thielrivate strRets which would inhibit the ability of emergency vehicles to serve the sate. t2) The maajarity of the `:units proposed do ,not have driveways Tong enough to allow vehicles to park ccmplete,, ly t of the street. Without sufficient off - street parking, residents and /4uestsy try to park in the driveways r+esixltirg in vehicle; extending into the street Impeding the circulation (including emtargeuc� access) within the develo sent. (3) ` Existing homem ners testified that the Parking within the developed phase J$r currently impacted. 3.,. Based upon the sybstantial evidtnce presented to his Commission during the above - referenced public hearing at <d upon the specific - findings of masts set forth -in paragraphh.4 ang 2 above, this Commission here finds and concludes as follows: (a) inat stri or literal interpretation and enforcemerrc of the specified regulation would not result in practical diffic al-Cy or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives i Of the Development Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary Circumstances or conditions applicable to the . { property involved or to the intendod use of the property that do not apply generally- to other properties in the same district. cc) That strict or literal Mtvpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileg �_;e�joy by °the owners Of tauter `ease 0 properties in the `i rict. i1 .$1..- " -..... 1. gp „. .' PLlWNINfi GOMMISSIfllC RESOLUTION NO. VA 87 -14 PAPAUG SPACE REDUCTION a BlMMIAN February 24, 1988 Pap (d) That to vanttng of the, Yk�riance will constit ite ,a grant of spacial privii inconsistent , with the limi'tAti s or gather propawties '41assified in the same dlnc t. V i) That the granting of the Variance will' be detrimental to the publ health, safety, or welfare, or Materially in4l IOUs to properties. or e; , improvements in toe vicinitya #< Based upon the findirr;A and conclusions set forth in paragraph �tby 1, 2 and 3 above, this Connpission'herapprove$ the applic4 400 subject to Each and every cordition set forth blow. S.: The Deputy Secret�,�Vy toy, this C ission $hall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APr?ROYEO AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968. PLANNING COMMISSION 6 " K CITY Or RAi! W CUCAMOWA BY: army +� , a rstara ATTEST: ra u er, Au y re ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretar of the Planning Commission "of the Ci ty of 1 Rancho Cucancnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing'= Resolutlon was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by Planning Comaission of the ..the` City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular m"tingg of the Planning Commission held ca the 24th day of February, 1988, by the «following vote- to-wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: A,gSENT, COMMISSIONERS:, C � gp „. tµ CITY OF II.g1.NCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM 1577 DATE: February 24, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning C.=' Ission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BV: Mncy Fong" Assoc ate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROM*KTAL ASSESSMENT FOP. DEVELOP R61EW 87.60 e cleVelopMen 0offf— I indastriaT buildings otaaTi'n9 125,260 square f *et on SA3 acres of land in the General IndustriI District, Subarea 8 of the Industrial ' Specific Ruin, located on the west side of iced Oak Street, between Jersey Boulevard anti Edison Court - RQN: 2Og -I42= I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION.- . - . --.... A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative, Declaration. S. Surroundin2 Land Use, and Zan-Ing. -Nor acanz ; benerat IndustrIOT, District Subarea 8 South - Orly completed Jndustrfii building; Coneral . Industrial District Subarea 8 East - Industrial buildings under construction-, General industrial District Subarea 8 West - Vacant; General. Industrial District SuLrd�2a 8 C. General Plan Designations: ?fi ec"i S e - General Paustrial North - General Industrial South > General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General _ Industrial D. Site Characteristics. The sift -'s -vacant with no signifizant vegetation. . zr I ITEM k ° PLANpo coma IN �TAP'P REPORT DR 8740 - amplum Fe bruary 24, 1438 Page 2�� Y E. Parking Calculations �� Number of Number of hype.. c, 5c -,I Parking Spaces Spaces 1' of use Pa ca it atia fiequired Provided- -°--`- ' Building Light ltd. 8,966 1600 14, 19 ` L; Building _2'A 9 n Light In .;6,335 ip 24 24 , I ,.'vilding 3 418- 717- Light Ind., 8,SW 1 /Eta 13- lli 11 Buildfnq 4,A,'7 .- . „fight Ind. 8,364 1/690 17 Building's - 0 " I din Innd. 81298. 1/600 BeLi M , t -Ind. P kB t in :L 23 � ' c: Building 101i Light Ind. 6,0',8 6 1 {800 11a" Bulldirig it _ Light Ind. r3,8ZB`` 1/500 28 33I' II. 1W� IS , A. Genoral; The site i5 --tOrtQZ:7� Phase III 'of the previous s, approved Master Plan A spawn -in Exhibit "B":'!'At „present, "while = '" Phase I is complete Phase 11 is under conrtr4cti6n. ;iris phased developmrdnt has sddcessfully completed the Technical and Design Review Coma„ ttee's review. Upon Approval JIf the Negative 'Declaration, the City Planner- will gran 1 final,; approval -af the project batsed'an conditions recr+ ended the Design Review and Technical Review #itteese. B. Design Review Comtttee ti The Committee IMcNiel, Wstav;`,, J o M_6_n re"1ewe 'ifi'e proposed project and -,commended approval" With the foll9wing conditions: 1. Ground - mounted ergipment such as tran6farmer should not be "` placed within pla area. A Additional articulation to the building p?ehe of 8uildIng "1I" should be provided, especially at t. office entry. The building accent colors should utilize the same, ones 'revised r ., within the_ business park, th 0evation- should bOF reviewed andl approved by the esign„ ev%ew Cotgtittee �5rior" to plan check. �;� �, Ptft(�dit CiiIS;Ul1 fil�oORi _Sf4F ��1' ©F- l Febr ;any 24 118$_ Page, r 3. The accent 010-t for s,,dl4ing% "I"' and!4� should be reviewed acrd ;l'pproved by the Opp ign RevieOeti amMee prior to issuance of building p". sit,` 4. , The concrete bl ock wall with stucco -Finish is ° acce table. Stucco finish should be as rlosg to the surfase-of tilt up y concrete_ as pasif?hla for those wall with public street , a:eeled. S. For the futdre ¢tYa ;e area in Building *IV with tempos y ; ( outO;tdi� storage, located at the southeast ?ortion of Phase !t-bf U1 o,� Master Plan N, ' >t a screen wdll would lye provided to the.pa t whore fdture building, will, q occur. Crain l ink fence v� iM woo&"Slats may be used to r= � contirue , from the screen WT, If Phase V of the tiaster Pian.did not receive building permits within one year from the date of this rase 11,1 approval, tijis portion of ,, chain link fiancee with ,Wood, ,slats should be romGved and should be repl iced ylith a per*anent. screen wait. 6. additional bix foot slide planter fingers should. be'j &ovided along the no proaerty boundary for Building 'i!O � C. Environmental sesswent,,-, Staff t 'i\s completO the Fav�traisme ai"�Iie'c4"tls and determined teat no significaA.t irzffact would res+a irons the development of .;his. proiect. IIE. PACTS FOR Fl. DINGS �'� pryorssed use . is coy`lstent with - the General an an n t. fiic plat. � Tile building design and.. ; G Site- Plan together w� , t �ded -sondi bons of approval are in compliance, %itt the , dial , S MJific Plan and ail o#;her applicable City Standards'r 1i IV. PECUl'�lENDATIOR: Stafs . ;r55nw; ds " that the Planning,, C", ission issue a: ega' a Declaration for Deveiopment Review 87 -60. Res fal i City annex BB:t1F=vc Attachments: Exhibit "0 - Site liap "a" Exhibit - Approved Msster plan \ Exhibit "G" - Dataaled ^Sfte Plan °> 4�'xhibit "D" - Con cehtual landscape Plat Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Pi an -hibit ' li F Elevations;: c, - oa e .. +f�' ,M iGlf ~ �� r IYyT4N * 'rM • �'. tN�M Y , ^_ �{ ftt s {t tt t.t3� t tt,fli t � "'••'"� (1 .''� tt':ft ��ti�i�i ►t'lri. "mss' Ar ice....... � • � , { . . ' ,a F � � � #-\. • .ate r 3 may. �..,k MV i """•••"^,.. ___... LLL � + •sue'. 4.:f. �.. s• �r �4 .k+.r+ .lt.*rr �, �� • Y . �• . a b A� yVIS �i�_ �.a ubri s y�t• rh 3� #lot ' Am vow saw 44 t t t • jut—.•^ f ''� BaRf Mi61I � SST � �i { • miff CITY OF i� pc*w r.. woerer TnU1 . »t` ,' iN NG EXVFAM = rl F,XRIBIT _._.e..._ SCALE-�. ram- c+ �� F c 1l v t,5 c D w 0 ca F F c 1l v t,5 c D w 0 ca -:, �� , r> I •Iff- 3 Ing of X10=, I ENE _EM ow" W, t'sm - ! , ME, I 1, 11 - aft. 1.. All A LA rmr-. Imor L416 'KAI n AFE WA w Arm "m - CITX_ OF RANC�iQ I VQAMONGt1 t 7 REPORT Yn 1 DATE: February 24, 1986 T0: Chairm ± and Members of the i CU!i q C0". sstgrt FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil En, ea i. BY: Joe St0f4,'Jr*, Associate Civil Eniineer SUBJFCT: Modification to'Conditions of 4D r�`al,fo� Parcel Map 9637' arce a an � =a 'roues o stto y ,an ans- -o ` 1. }prova re IUiring they unai grounding of utilities along 9th Street far the k 4ave opmens: of an Wdustrial Park and related Parcel Mi ,ps in the general Industrial located on ` 'the northeast corner of Yineyar'ci .end- 9th Street. f (APN 209 "012- 17,2+1 Be 211 f I. RBSTFi &: �J The Developer :is requesting a reduction i�the length of utility i undergrounding along 9th Street required by three separate approvals, ors: the property,:,. II. BAC.,KGROUND: - ,Parcel Map 9537, approved on March 26, 1085, subdivided" an C " shaped parcel into .a small 1,4; 5 acresJ,,iiparcal rin tfte grner of Y�ityard Avenue and 9th Street and a Targer� (20;9 acrO- parcel extendir, frtm 9th Street to .Arrow Route (E:ahibit "B "). OR 56 -13, approved on July 23, 1986, consisted of an Industrial Parr art (1 Parcel t of Parcel Map '9537 ( Exhibit "G").:;?�'Parcel Map 9972V approved on October 22, 1986, subdivided DR 64-13 into 3 parcels (Exhibit "O "). ?'he first project approved, Parcel Map '9537, required that the utilities be undergrounded along the entire 9th Street frontage with tha development gf either Parcel l or 2. DR 86 -1,3 was the first of cthe two parcels. to be - developed; therefore it was cont<t! .ked to under round thel +entire ~frontage as required by Parcel.Map $�;.i. Suteuu61 . the same conditimn was + imposed on Parcel Map`110922'. The Developer has Solt 1rar�s'l a of Parcel Map 9637, and, it iv' Il currently undeveloped, r ti iTB�4`D - .EtANNINH COMMISSIC,M, STAFF REFDR1` ,,��""��i 9537, PM, 591 D U, -13 »Messenger i;'ebruary, 2, 1t 1 Page 2� , The Qeveloper's lettek,Ooquesting the conditipli, modff ication is attaghesi as Exhibit "E": Copies of the conditions in quastion ftr' each project are snt,wn 4p El hSbit "F ". the wording on each is somewhat, different, buZ the � leilgt4 of undergrounding ,and when it is to be°_ oVleted is consistent. The utilities in relation to th ;,ar,ugerty ar hoaat oti_�:Exhibit LIL ANALYSI�I• There were three bas c reasons xhy thy- entt' -e frontage was required -, to be undergrounded'oth the first parcel to'be dovge )ad: 1. The D�sO_loper had given staff the ftpressior,, 't par, el 2 `df � PM 9537 would be developed .fist, Also,, Par��r��ras 6 times _ larger khan 'Parcel 1; ,therefore it, appeared reasonable 'sca` require the additional under'groundi,nl3 fr°unting Parcel 1 16 . - order to spread the cost to thy „lartjest area possible. - 2. It would clean Up the entire frontage at one timeu 3. It would reduce the ch&s of the future Developer of Parcal' 1 ,;”' ; claiming the,_ fairly parcel because he `hardship, would have.,utility, undergrounding on both the Vineyard Avenue and 9th Street f�lontagas. The Developer i'S,\, requesting the condition modification 'for the folle"ng reasdnx:� 1. Ne- states thab�he misuYiderstood the condition. He f 4 hat it actually meant -to uridergriiut d the portion fronting ihcb Parcel `s as it developed, which is the usual pract�� a `= 0 2. He did,- not budget sufficient_Junds to complete the tnt #re_ length of •undergrounuing, because of his misitttoersi anding, ?, 3. He is nearing comple ion of the project' And needs to obtain occupancy clearance. Staff's response'to the aboyv is as follows. 1. The limits' of required undergroutid ng were clearly stated'in each approval. Also, staff - ,members remember discussing the issue with the novel oper`s c�epresentatives. r PL` NnNG cfemISSFON "STAFF RF -PORT PM ,•9537,, Pit 9472 and OR 96 -13 d Messenger;o fetrary Page 3 a. G 2. and Both of these are crose4aences of= 8 the Wt'i alleged misuedersi,artYtnge Staff ` f0 • that- 'there were - sound s; Ana for re.�uirinq the j additionaVIec th Af` u"dergroutiding and 'that tt�e reguiremont arcs ' dearly arrittV. -, all three appv°ovai ,$. cl. �EC1Etit�lTTf� - ` S' aV r�(,onm4ds Idenia`l of the recP!ot for a canditinn .; rncdtfic�t� ion. a .I Respectfully submitted, r . Garrye R, Hanson Senior Civil Enginil.ier, t. BRH:JS:ssi M;achments: Vicinity Map' (Exhibit 04e') Parcel P4 9537 (txhihit OR 86 13 (Exhibit Parcel'Map '9973 (Ex�fhit -OR) tlevelcaer�'s lre;i er :[Exhibit "E ")'; Cone of Approval„ (Exhibit FR) G, 953x' ;�' Ji n M 9972 Utility Locations (Exhibit "G") v k� rI , FOR JWZV3T lab •1l2 comm"C44,- UCL ON%.*' 3estr f iat 'riuTATN/E ;., PARCEL. MAP NO. 9972 IN THE CM' CF RAN040 C.tlCANIC}t O !SSA y�am•• y}( ,� dY.wK•frMf,rrarPar s1'+r'eat '►ua1fJ't •i+�MOri.Ifnts �'f.7iAt -,r[ µ, fMUSSR�wt�wa�uwrrryn`w ¢L a�rrsaesa tto RgNRtK 9CGrf tJNb' c � eu,.eru.,� xets az p1 ..�'`I >DerccAbtcq •[Rff crfiB ran �� \_ /f>t.e s v'p, �Mt� AIKINIff.J W411:YS C► IICVINi.':N1M fR7e � 7CJ@saty rwWrry�.,y F ' 'i (trat lVi.t7W0 2fl t,1lV s!�'Mr[wfftrfML Nµ - ' .ya AVTM�i9Ch �{G4fRy OA4�l CS.:VrP liCilt ' tZ 2t - ♦ri+.++.[s� [ r�'.•'wr.. tapgyy. 4i: a; AICR.ullt <i[, ✓ i lteavJ .1JlR'W V � •. siwas � -- s .'rat •aww.. 6iXC94 l low .. v <• a. 41 ice» `"� * r 14 A (... '..'.. i7 £T ��ys� 'HG t DWI MEPINC IR INVE#TMENTft,#,pANY January 26� 1988 t, 3 4 "CCITY pLali Road Rancho CucAZonga, CA 91730 r Attention.- FCarsn 'Xissaa k Reference. Arro$r Business mark. Ninth Street Ltttderyrounai�ng Raqutixem*nt • PX 9537, PM 9972, Dik SOS., Dear Ms. Kissack: Messenger 3 AV*stm*nt Company roquqsts that this V,lafnnii, Commists'On grmnt modification of conditions of the folloWi,ng XJ Ph '=537. PX 99'72, DR 85 -�i3. The lass Ono of+et far this: g+te3aw are as �a3�ows: PM 9537 < '$207.00, P3+t 9972 ,� $2t�7.t?Q, is; r4vi w 2353..00, fol? a total of $665,00. -, A brief histzry Of the project and conditions is as follows: I- Parcel,` Map 9537 Prol"er':y Tito 2 (enclosed) divided the ekisting owner, and crux paxcela. 7Parcel i w to a different went partnorship purchased 118roe2 2. The condi'cion to underground the )t existing utilities on Ninth street par 0.3,b.. ('attached) required undergrounding prior to an occupancy permit for either Parcels l or 2. MIC Anterpreted this to aseah 'mat her entire fr- ontags (Paresels 3 & 2 Pei 953.7) "otl;d be undergrounded but that We VOuld be responsible fix° our PrOlOct frontage 2 PI: 5537) beeforw' any occupancy g (ParGeel A Y permits on Parcel 2 and tha Olin of Parcel 1 PM 9537 Would undOrground hi rroject frontage prior to an occupancy permit an his p �W Czsel. 2• DR 85-33; During this desi requested at plan for Marcell PH 953�� -tclbe included in our Master Plan. Since this property owned cooperated, We included his site in ouIr Master Phan. The DR 86-13 condition under "Engineering Division,, Paragraph 3,b. (attached) stated, cos did the condition for PM 5537, MC01K. 'OF CVY OF I'J',i - ` 537 k A&*)3 ` 4?' RANCHO CUCAM NGA . t 1 t �r>t. Rar6e31 T�isYeFe!CO;C rt' ! catx c? RMCHO c:ucAKax(;a aanuary n6, 1988 page Two that the amount of undargroundircg required, -was the entire frontage of Panels i a 2 of P2 9!532 HOwrevsr, it was understood that the timing would be in conjunction with the of each parcel.. HIC did not consider our Lndox4rounding requirement ; >t =be beyond the first pole cast &''west of our property lin#& (Marcel 9 'PM 9537) in accordance with your; undergrounding re quiireaients (Planning C4 aiusioz_ Resolution 27'0. 86 -77) . 3. Pascee :::NAP 9972 (attached ).o As lase was Progrtessi ng in our development (Parcel 3 $!t 953 r) , our su*n in Partners x�squirsd us to subdivide our project further J in crdsr to meet with their in- boUsee requirements. 24sc Proceeded to process Pti 9922 in a fast track process II because of the late requirement ispeastssd " MC by our financial partners. Tae undsrgrcunding conditie;- on this map under ".Special Condition" Paragraph 1.8. (attached) reefersss tc the "entire Pr=oject frontage" and-_ goes on to describe it as teeing from -the seat ed,'¢ Property line of Parcel 3 P 9992 to the west side c, Vineyard. In fact, the project frontage is only tr, r, the easterly property line of Parcel 3.•T 9972 to the weatearly prop arty liner of Parch 2 PM 9972 (approximately 500' Bast of Vineyard). The 'planning commissionon currant feaso"sution #87 »96 regarding undr :rgrounding Of asxisting utilitUS states that developers shall be responsible Zor undes:grounding all,- isscisting overhecd utility lines including the removal and 'relatod- su g pclan adjac�. ;t to and within thA limits Of that dayslop&%t%t Innour project, the lines are on the pra4 get side of thaw street and ec hay ; , accomplished the undsrgrounding radjitceent to a►nd within Zili limita of our development. by undergroundin along Parcel: 2 3 Of PM 9972 to tote first poi+! w;mmt of ou; Orojact acid the first poles west of our project lissia, -_ st i Logical to assure that can Pareel 1 of PH 9 07 is levee edged, theca C�itaud be requirements for thOM to undaas:gr_ound tine utilities adjacent i s and in front of their development: Your cure%;nt resolution on Undergrcunding does not address reimbursoama :it of the undergrounding ghat would be accomplished ss first of the Adjacent, parceals o:a the project side of the street, The pity, s currant agrpament for rtimbursement of. pullic imProvements and "(undexgroundinq of overheead ut lit as) also only indicaitex that reimbursement would come from the beetlafiting Parcels which are described only-- on the oPPosite side of the: \� MES5ENGi" NYF5rMiNrco�iMA1 �� Eat 2 O=-- -�..� Imo. xaren lc3.ssack -. - PITY or Ri1�iCtiQ Ct3C�w3.�iC,�4, Janua r . ' - - , ° . �. •��: 1.988 � _ Pago, T._sae ,r, straet, not an the pzaect of t�za street, It seeau8 t�tattttne intent of :ise- raquixexeait tor: undergrosa inq ;niili�:,mss is ,far t itr# henasfit of ate got t VLt ';he utility lint ar>t aidjtcani to anik within the liatit . of tire, devi$,lopatnt. Barry Renown a�' atct« rr iV City Engineer has stated that th "94 _ con4itiOnx (as plaac4d on those at t" first arscupancy permit b Use, he L"o) tit9bat erera triggered . V*rcels 1, a a 9 of W 997Z' could „bear tt a burden batter than parcel. 11 of Bpi 9g37. W+t feel' that this is, fair Barre ,Hanim,$n is i ailu 1� � sr9�+wrtt ar�E one in' ,Which. lei (ion.. , to evaaluate «: tinq tha ” Planning Cmws . iort nctt�v� Of ly -33, 199+6 in which: R ,,86 -,,3 was sevimvedy tturaa tmsesscuauri �regardins�, the,, requie�«e.�t° of une ��ding el00ta:ical_ lines along �tiniyard"=-and attaching oquiresents`to the dove lop nt on P"V is 1 or.) pX 9972. At that tis�r the panning r.�issior , rea�ogni�ted that. i was an unfair na't. tioaa`' to- the _.da iolapsent of fir . pro�a�t isn1.1 deleted Mr. Hanson *z aatio�rr f'or that conhi ' on to , DR 86-23. Ws feel that this saw or similar reason � applied -�C the everhO&d utilities °alanar Ninth Street outside caur l of davolopment. Messenger ln- ortsxent Company r ts iw the conditions 'for the above xgntioned Parcel Maps usd D«sf�Rey -rots be tied to .:the occupancies of the respacti"�'; sit" and `uot to the . ti:rat occupancy of anY property, along 71isi'th St.:aet. We look forward to hs tring °ycur decision an this matter, ,if Jja can be of any, a*sisttncs tO yoq or your sbtatf*f, please, do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yo OS . Pest or j Project Manager SEP /kbw 1 cc:3stf Gordon /MIi: 3 i MXSSI&'GtR INVIStMJNrCOM#ANy , two PN�' g537 9th Street » Existing overhead electric lines less than 66 KV, 'an ±e el_cOVeunicatiOft lines ar^ the north sic, of 9th Street from b" the first pole east of the easterly prope ft,, 11611 to the first pole west of Vineyard Avenue shall be placed underground prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for either Parcel 1 or " Parcel 2. OR 86.13 9th Street: Existing overhead electricals lines less that;, 65 ky and telecOMMunieations lines on j the north side of 9th Street frogs the first pope east of the easterly praperir line to the first pole crest of Vintyrard A0nue shall ,be placed underground prier--- to issuance of an occupancy permit for any devalopee3t. ii PM 9,972 " 9th SA VET - The ex•sting overhead utilities (ttleconarunications and e ectr rmaT) on the P °elect sid+- of 9th Street shall be undergcunded along thl! entire project frontage extending from the first pale east of the A,T. b S.F. Railroe Spur along the eagerly property line to the first pain west of Vineyard Avenue prior bd public improvement acceptance or occupancy for Paroal3 2 or 3, whichever occu =s first. ReiMbursiNnent of one -half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future davelgmnt as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is feasible from the presently undeveloped preptrties. f �.� t1 � o i v rrc ci',! tau 1�G � _ I Naf P-1.9 Aa i t�ahcad 1 77! Crff * ErT✓" O , DWI U o • CITY OF RANCHO CU &ON ��.►• A DAM February 24, 1988 �� -7�o. Chai7an� and f the Planning Commission �Rom-' 8rud�Buller, CPlan4r �BY Greg Gage, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: C0NMIDNAL USE PERMIT 88-05 CALVARY COPEL - P raquest iQ es�3T1'TK a c urcK a a"'�Sun�`5�i oUr in a 'leased space oil 1,280 square feet within an existing business'' park on 4.92 acres of 14nd in the General indpstrial District (subarea dl located at the ;rcuth side Cif' 7th Street, east of Archibald Menue - Aft., 20g- 211 -35 and 47. 1`. 'AWECT Alt9 SITE DESCRIMON: � A. Action Repuexted. Approval of a CanditfianzJ ilxe: rrit. I S. Surroundina Land Use and Zoning- 'En - vscan ; Suoarea South - Mul-;i- Tenant Industrial, Subarea 4 E<1St -, Indu4trial; Subarea 5_ West = Single Family Resfidzatial, Lure ( w4 d,ymI*pg uni per 'Acre) C. - General Plan Designations* " = ro„ect'S'iie = Zeneral ineuustrial Borth General Industrf ;�l South -,,General Industrial East - General Industrial West - tow Residential, (2-4 dwelling units. per acre) 0. Site Characteris�4ics• The site is a multi - tenant industrial park curren `1;, - occupied by a (deli, business tachine service company, a plastic b(ittle manufacturer, and various \other industrial type: uses. �- E. marking Calculations; Ru*ber of !lumber o5 , Type Square Parking Spaces �atles ° of use l, footage Ratio. 'Pty fred Proved Church Church 1,280 37 0 . IiEMk -E Ft iklW OWISSION alt CUP 8845 -,Cal vary G)v"l February 24 1988 Rage 2 AW - II. SACKGR0UNO: Calvary Baptist currently occupies 0 square fert i 1 of enar► sppa:.e (Suites SI?, ail, Up w ithir. .the §S�tpu Susiiress a Centev operating cinder Conditional U t se Perm ft was 11 i approved by the Planning Coarmissipn ofs Maur 27, 19$ , II. AHALYSIS: 9. A. General, ~ The Ca�yary Chapel 'is propo�ng to use au add;tiatl�i T; ware feet of taunt space (Suite 8071 to relocate Choir offices and provide additional spaca for children's activities•.' on Sundays. The church has indicated that ifhe addiionisl space is be61ng requeitod,,,to`' ;nsure- tha "ire( strict occepan requi►�an�ents are "t; L lodOr I , - log PV ,,2S. the current ,approaes ti.0 max. pereked accupa't , 7F►e ire pistri. the proposed ti Fn of the ctrUrcas line t B. Parkin;L As With outer proposals of this type, a xir '4-jary ii""'oncurre `the -of � is availabiloiti „ on- s'itV,�park ng. ��Se approx'Nately 230 parking sp4c6g located on the site, 65 so *' 4`s lI are located directly adjaye Ctz,tto the building occupied;py \the church. A total of 97 sp6es are°requir^ed for the eytst�hg 44d ' proposed church facilities. Tha businesses. Iodated within the suites surrounding., the church !•roil "sties typically operate between 8,509 A.M. and ..6 :00 P.14, on weekdays, and the church is not pF 4i :to deviate from � trc� approved hours of operation on we'erser.j and after 6 P.14. - ;OQ on ,,week night The tihurrrt off#cei typical 1.y operate, V`10 A.W. to 4:30 P.M. anday,ohrurg'A '= Friday. Accordingly, too parkfngg ;onflicts resulting from the proposed expansion are anticipiate In the event that, Such conflicts. do_oc4�r, a condition fay been included requiring Planning Conkissiur; revise if churct activities adversejf _ effect surroundtnViusin6sses< IV. >FACTS FOR FINDIIAS: The proposed Use is consistent "v�th vie Hera VTaH`—a-5a7iW6 Industrial, Area Specific Plan. :proposed use„ together with Jhe recommended conditions of approval, will not be, detrimertal to the publtc "health, safety,_ or welfare, or _materially injurious,,,, properties', or improvements in the vicinitv, ; Y. COROt Ptin?4SENCEz This item has been advertised 4'a $�`,Oublic hearing Th . a Y eport newspaper, property posted, and ni�V'.ces ,,sent to —owners all pr(rr ' wititin 300 feet of the site. ( l R'i'os` - Gal v 'Y Chapel , z' Fabrut qt 24, 19 - �t _ Page v V< MO- NDATION: Staff rrtc ends that th Planning, COMISslon - << �! R' ons r �a Pub i input on this au} ie *� ,. afteif� loch L., sider&Vgft, thc, Commission cap►, suPPO t the. rec Ai"da�)on of I apPro ai, 400tiorv"Of Vi� attached 3 esclet" h w�_r ditio� tas�tld bs Sdn asap r _ aespe ` ;;7y s B.....rte- ne E VC rs 1S Attachments: S £x;h it A °:yca� on map U �) IbI "B" - t Plan exhibit "C"lr Plan u ' KesalutiaP of kp�sr�va nWth Condition ar C:1 = os The City'Qf Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cemmisslon F.C.`Sox. $07 r' rr Rancho Oucamone's Ca. Co=ission kembe'ra Calvary Chapels xectuestfCtg a mnodifibation :'tc. an exi`sti - Condi.tiQna3 �e Pe -mit: Po. th.e puxToae f using ,suite #807 in r the Sole t� us ress Centex. ' It will. ba'' a od for of ioe end afti.n { istrat on. ' qi W,ra d 0 Srea of thy- building will. , to uamd irt' G assea4�ly areae • ! ., �, - The hours of. ap4katiozi4?br the 9:rfi.ce will, ba from 8 1 OS.m �'r{ t to 4s30p.m. Monday through Prlday. ", m}hye warehouse asemV1,y arek will be used On ftidaya mom 92 ��a.m� Calvary Chanej is applying at this location „beoause we at »�+essnt occupy three sui i s in: tare see business park, Gonsidera pion, -,for granting the ModifIcatioi� #;a the ex stir ( C.U.P. will enable us to ser`' a ,our congregataon,, ?mod those Wh6m 1 mWj came. to our followshi�l r�oxe erficientl.y. t� Ve F-` u1Y outs, d'iv, Orata:paetor 1 u. o JOf jao n ' I -z} r t7V Ah 5t. Sub #810 CWOMngm, CA 917 .. ry �e�ou uj sT PAR ?x4.36 -2G tu SITS AGM/L { aga 44; AC. V & (4420 AM IN /L ►- 1-016 17" "Sr 313'x711 1riO 12 77 1 +. •Pbr4: " J Pop, 12 i 3.04 AC. FAA - 3a •' yaisrtsetrr t t o t 9.9-' AC 11 Par. 1 v a �a 3,94 AM 4.93 AM '.C8 AC 41 1,tl7. 32llrAS T.C.A. i GJ9 (4 w Par. I Par. 2 Par. 5.307ACU /L 27 t,r,' 2.30ACM/E Qi t1r It[ i �'ar. 39 9 11 i co t 43 �d 1 4WA"• 4.47 3 948 A0. MIL �$ , CSW Q 2.28 AC 1.55AC I 2.49ACM& ail 1 1 tf /Y2 dfJrr i Irri 1 r, sm OF rrm: —Call P ��°• ANCI-L t - TITLE= cyrs�> J 1 i pct to SCALI: �l "t Al CHMALD AVE S'Aftr so_ T _ t t C Do 2,931 160 1,182 1 l t C t r'f E G 1.200 "} !E3lAtaAik6f 9 1,200 1,342 A 1.6 ; A a,0 DIS 8 � .80 c+� r 4 ._._. c r.na C1 �-7 st�sgc >Gt. 1r1f111111ft111 !� TTtx.l 1 t 1 It 6 Sr ,rm— s df ' ` ii � I � lnmpsTirtsl. arvrrs 11 . c A_ A TYPE 50. FT: ry r . h d 1,480 �I i A - IiR s 8 1.280 :C !02 A Ifi i 1 C - I'M D 2.176 Ic A >Ma t>- =s: i C !6Y A an ClW OF 1 Ei :emu; E ER bF AWL lop �i giv-11ce Race prI0 4 �i �t7 EXar° SiGAt Jt �1, A97 i CiCTitasitatJlU OA� $� '''Y �A abyotB1 .: W.EAR..I. t 21 1 • tp; _0 a CITY OF, "ITEM. RANUT.�Dlf.0 TITLE= stt�tS'e�,C�4�. PLANNUt C E CCt-ii LFW t 'A� �_.r" � a 1 RESOLUTION NO. _\ A RESaLu119N OF THE RAidCHa CiJGAwON6A PLANNING CONFtI "S).ON APPROVING ) 1TIONAL USE -?EMIT lip. BIOS FOR--, A CHURCH I OFFICE ANCt it MLY AREA LOCATM AT 2751 ARCHIBALD A'YENP5 (SUITE 84i',I ,'THE GENERAL 1NOtiMIAL DISTRICT A. Recita q. (� (1)- Calvary C' Por has filed'an application for the issuance -of Conditional Use Permit Nit. 88-05 as "descried in the title of ,,this Resoit!tion. Hereinafter- n this Resolution, i:he su(de+ct Conditional ' Use Permit request is',referred to as mthe application". (11) C the Z4 of February, 1588, the planning. ComGiss on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga- conducted a -Vy noticed public hearing, on the � application and concluded said hearing on that'da,,e, 'j (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution 7 have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, T�OEFORE, it is hereby' found, Wtirmined and resolved by the =1 Planning Comaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comissi,5re hereby speciffcaVy finds that all cf the facts set forth lathe Recitals-, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. � 2-1, Based upon substantial evidence presented to;, this Ccmmission i during the above-refereed public hearing on February 2*,�1988 including written and:, oral staff reports, `together with public ',,testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (al iho application applies to property ,t,ocated at 9767 7i¢r Street, Suite 80' a suite located in a multi- tenant indutriai complex wfih approximately 230 parking spaces, and �i (b} the suites surrounding the application are occupied by j tenants with operating hours tyolcally between 8.00 I +.Rd. and'S *.00 P.M. and weekdays and which are closed on weekends, and (c) Tlie applicant proposes to operate the church office between 8:30 A.M. and 4 :30 P.M. "and assembly for children's activities will be conducted on weekends and a ter'6:fltt P.M. on weeknights. i \ It 3. Based upon t` su4stsntial evidence presenti;1t to this Coaanission ✓ during the above-referenced publ % hearing and upon the i0kific findings of f;;�t5 set forth in p$rragra� f,11 and 2 "above, phis Commission hereby. finds and, Alk concludes as follows: 1 r PLANNING COWISSION RESOIUT.ON HO. CUP 88- 05•,.- Calvar, #shape February 24, i9 r Pale 2 =v� f `' (a) That the ,?roposed ijse ti in accord moth ttie General PTO, the objectiVes of the Industrial Area Spec fi; Plan;, and the purposes,,of the district in which the site is laaated. (:b) 'That the pri. csed use, together with the conditions ipplicible thereto, will not be detAmental to the ,public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvetsnts in thz vicinjty. (c'? *st the proposed use t*li:es with-each of the applicable provisions q� the Industrial- Area spwfic, Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and - certifie4 that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the CAIIforri� 6vironmentol Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this.Co�ission hereby iss4 ^s a idegstive Declaration. t /i 5. eased upon the findings and conclusions set f (th in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, tMS Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every, condition set fortth below and incorporated herein by thiso reference. Conditions: (1) Approval 'of this request shall not waive compliance with hll citions of approval for CUP 87-15. 7 (8) Approval of this request shaj�1 not waive tcapliance with alT . sections of the Ind�t`sirial Specific. P'Ula, and all other c, applicable City Ordinances. 13) The building shall not be occupied, until coii letion of all iwproveWift`V required by Building and Fire Codes to the 3atisfacd ion of the Opilding and Safety Division and Foothill ;! !' Fire Protection Distrt�t. _ Pr°ior to occupancy, plans" shall be li submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safely Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for COW11ance prior,--to occupancy. it (4) The building may be used for religious a5se bly and other large group (50+ persons) 'activities obly on Saturdays and Sundays and /l after S:OO p,m�n weeknights. (5) preschools or schools are not allowed y "this permit: however,, <,Y this shall . not nnim —In to u,.rmriec or Sunday Scl;ool Yu;.3rin thv " hours of religious 'itr group assembl 0 _ v , II R IHINF Ci'WISRION R aUTION w CUP 'B8 O"a » Calvary Ch'; I February ./24, 1988 _... - Page - _— �> �� Ail sigts proposed fiar ih�s Cen�.{gtianai Use,` ��!!ei °t; shall, ,be l designe�a in conformance Ntith >t'�e C "4 =j `5 5iyn trd(na:ne and the aporoverlatfrat Syn Pror; for t orbcctnd'hll require review ,and, approV$l by the Pl =_ aiag # ;4s:on, prior U l,j Sri J (7} If rho opp,ration of ties Condif�ionnl Use Peragit c�,u4es adverse effects to neighboring husines es, the 'Canditionai Use Permit I1 shall be brought before t ni ng CcA ti sior; far their review and possible termination 6. fie Deputy Secretary to this " C *wission Shall certify to the adoption of this `ticrolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THI� 24TH 1%Y OF FEBRU , , 19a. :PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCWC 11' UCAMDX,GA By: < Larry T. , M;` if, a rmaj ATTEST: er, Deputy are ary k f Brad Buller, Deputy +Zecretary of the Planning Cowa%sior� of the City of e. i ncho CueaoonjA, do hereby certify ".t) the foregging'Resot-lution was 'duly ane regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning :,COMission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of (thei Planning {;opaa.'ssi- ` 01r on the 24th day of February, MS, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: COMMISSIONERS: d ABSEKT: COMMISSIONERS: (r G ` r1 CITY STAFF REPORT— ` -7 n � . I, A-4a 1977 W!E: February 24, 1988 (� TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Emission FROK. : Buller, City � ?lanner k BY tda)j Gy Fong, A3sociate Planner (( SUBJECT. ENVIRMWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT' Sr,2D f" REMERN PROPERT-T17 - Tne aevetopme n Of a buslness pa consisting a s x u'fldings totaling 155 °r 029 square �fget on 12.9 acres of land within the Terra 'Vista Planned Community located,-at the norV cast corner of Elm Stet and Town Center Drive - APN 137e'- 421 -06, and 1077.- 051 -17y I. PROJECT AND SITE BES2P�TPTID�le i, V A. Action Requestod: .Approval of a bbsiness park, 0etailcd�)te _ an, a eva cns, aW issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Surroundin Lanz! Use and 2om3n r to _ par men s; Rol us Zens ity Residential District dwelling urtits p er acre "e South - Vaoint with Approved 'Town Center Project; Carnaur�lty. � Commercial District East - : Vacant- Nigh Density Residential D1� trfct (24-30 � dwel7.7"� units per acre) West - Virgfhf'a Dare Business Park, Brunswick /Deer Creek �\ Shopping Center; General commercial 01sVict C. General Plan Desi nations° , ro ec'E Site- = ar° North Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Community Comma -vial Districf East - High Density F_J dential'(24 -30 duelling units per acre) West - General Commerci ecistrict 0 Site CbA i cterstics: Tile site s vacant, regecation consists 0,111. cay ng-vineyar s, and It slopes from north t6-south at appraiiimafiAly Z'to 3 percent, v iTEV! F o PLANNING, COMMON STWF 'REKRT CUP 86-20 - WESTERN PRI)PERTIES - February 24, 1988 t E. Park calcutations 'uf Nuaiiar 1; Number of Type o Squaro Parking Spaces Spaces ). !' of Mije Footage Ratio Required Pruvvidet' - A 36,739 1/250 147 447__ B %1:0,642 1/250 43 '4` 17,864 1/250 71 71j,; D 3( 1 2 1/250 120 12 _ E 7 1/260 41 758 �iG 16 Totals 155,029 .. 620.E 62(v, F. Applicable Regulations: The estib�iahme171 a;f a Business Park -vet 'District requ Pes a CoCltionai Use Permit to be reviewed and approved by the Planning�Coaaaibsion. II. ANj4.YSIS• A. ' `NMck raundt' This proposed project was submitted in August, o cgn�urrentiy with the proposed Terra- Planned ra aVista 241 nit amendment (TYPi.A 85..02) to es, Business Park : =�laY Zonn.. The Planning �C issian,- on ,arch 25j, 1987, ` reviewed the proposed Businesso Fork Overlay District and determined At. to ee inconsistent with, the Community Plan, �anaral `Industrial Plamj,,,and the Spec4li°cPlan and racommended dei,ial toth6'City Council, The developer resubmitted another version of the Business Park Overlay Zone whliah was eaview�d.by the Commission on duly 22, I987. TAe -Commission reviewed this final vers1,gr,?.1TVPCA87 - -02) and recommended approval to the City Council. $ie' Planning Commission also recommended that the overlay z',ie '.only be allowed in the Office Paris District 1 r, located south of Town Center Drive and east of Haven Avenue.` On August 19, 1987, the !City,, Coutncil reviewed the proposed ' nendmen, anu rlpro4ed. it with tithe- ,;change that the Business �[ Park Overlay Zone be allowed only for the Of;ice Park District j/ located at this site. The developer.,resuba►itted this projsct for Committee review in August of 198f. Geireral, The,,proposed' Site Plan consists of s4yc uildirgs with V I' ol<ur"64 -them oriented towards the street front&gis. Three of thy, smaller buildings are on 'A, towards the interior of they with a, large �jaza are-,i6`-the middle, Continuous pfldestrian is nections)are provided throughout the;.site to link 1 to the major Olaxa area. The atchitecture is of a contemporary ' 5VOTe with such elements as towers arbors, gable ofs, avinings, concrete columns, drlvrt portico, etc, { G ,. 0 E' PLANNING COWlikON STAFF REPORT _ f^ CUP 86.20 - -WEST RN PROPERTIES February 24, 1988 Pane 3 C. Oesi p Review Qrcwmittee: P Committee 4Chitiea, 9lakesley, K'gytl"I y VMStri"iy" r ied'�his project on September 7, 1987 ana,raised concerns over'the lroposed architectural stye as it did not x �c�ide for c 'tib lity in building form, materials, and color to nearby re �'€den3at development, the Terra Yis Town Center,Aoaping ceni-project and the offici�r->ark. Other -1 concerns included the service driveway and the roll•up..door c that encourages industrial use1 -.� The developer revised their pl'`0a att4 rlesubmitted far Committee royiew on February 4, 19ft The Comittee reviswed the revised. -fens and recomWnded approva! with conditions as follows 1. Additional pedes4;ion amenities smch as additional benches and -fxee- standing, livht fixtures should be provided alorig the greenway trail on Elm Street. 2. Pedestrian conneciiins should be provided to the corners of Town Center Drive an:d Terra Vista Parkway, and Chunk Street and 'errs Vista Pai twat'. 3. (r The hgrizontal roof line for the reae elevation � should be broken up 41th'additianal architeotara elements subject t;p City Planner review and approval. 4. Special landscape treatment could to, provided to tO greenway ;;,ail subject W fty Okanner review a >) anayFproval. �C S. The landscape theme siivt1d tie in with the Offfce Park project and t�,e Town CenterprozNlct. 0. Environmental Assessment: Pal ^t I of the Iii ti at Study has been C omp e e y e app cant, 3)taff has completed Part i1 of the ;:nvironmental Checklist and ftund no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The projects is consistent with the )�encral Plan and 24fgiqf%Sta Community Plan. The projest,wil'; q# be C � detrimental tq the p�41is health ,or safety, or cause °nuisanc's or - significant adversenvironmentil. impacts. In addition, the proposer -base, building design, ,end Cite plan, together with' `hP recommended conditfOFO of approva;-;are in compliance with the Terra Vista Community Plan $d all tithe appjicable eevisions of thr Cit ° 7 standards. r y P- 0- 4NING COMMISSIO4 SOFY' AEPORf t�� - `864). CUP MPEAn- �S February 24, 1988 �. �> CU6tkESPOl6�ENGE. , � is firm has bett, advewtixed as a public , C, I f, The D- � Htt er 1 4 water +'M Pt�€c hgarvn tats eS rere Vent o all tr �€zn : e in feet of-the o•act s €t . the s €± has been Pasted for pubic hearing. In , 1t. ii�C d!Ei#GAtIt]I!s 8tafP,. recomwds uat the PU$ nfvlg Comi:ssion approvd and i071al, ,US& Petikitt, 86-20, and issas a i�ative �c'Caration, - gs full C€ d P1 rte 88• �Ip'ae Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site YUtiltxatiorr'Ma x � r Exhibit " - 1ltd Site Plan E Exhibit 's aWeptual' Undscapa Purr r ,� Exhibit "0' - CChcept:Aa I Grading Plan E Exhibit: "E* w Elaxatib�: Exhibit OF" - V1argemeats El ements, Exhibit cGr laxa'and • Eni$rge nt 01 P� Traiiway Resolution of AP srosai with Canditio nj � c , 11111 r � t' IJ i �ry} tt n �.r yyyyf Y��yy: Cam'N� y i It PAW PAW , w{�� P,,tp CITY CF: il"1.w'Ya"fANC D(*v?ISM SCALWE- cI ................. Jk A Sic a I wv a� �! I W, I ! „ 1 ff 711 .✓. ak 41 �o rl j 4 t I .�y d a ♦ a ,�' ,�. "�q�', 'r �, Y t -..� i � tNN��rrr ,j �yyp � � f i��y +. \ 1 fir.►+ ; / s g !} 1 nil ``� '�� 1 ,BSc..• � ��+�! ;� �t�Y' �_.1. .4`0 t1 i1La Qt I f 4 + ul !�[ �-.. ��,� }.. ,� t. _ V �_. •� yea � � r �f Mw� 71, 41 litl I p �4 , , I, . k "I M " li , I't co '27= wt C2 LO X7, W lk F7 — 7 Al A �j for, J' aw�4ax►k�� s. � ata+�+a�trwrotit a� �� 4xk'�t�!€MMS� 1�4j�R'161�GilAMF Ph1i►ai1111�TAi.AYry�$' `` LLLJ Y }� `\} �� ✓ TERRA VISTA. BUWNESS PARK wE &TER PROPMEs CITY OF MANNING DIVWN EXH ",F r \ �� . / d� Q }�( . �. % � t/ yam° \� \� � ��2 �� f 2 « �� \ ��\ �.\ / �� .� \\ _: �� \ : � � � \ ( ^� < � �: \� � - U � � � �, �Y-� i �, ��. :�,r f � _. i - - �. i r � AT / `�� 4' i' s �. �� ;� ram � \.M ��' r �S . � � � �". �, y` � _� 4 i \\ p a� t r �,.� � .• .. r �{ �� :� � `� it T' '�� ^r � �. L _ - u}.. \� �� - _ � �� :'.ti F 3 i .� �., c . � t t: 1; i ✓ 5p F � � � � � _ �� I. � � �' a e ,> > � � r � � � �, 'tom � �� ° � � i � �`'�`" � �; _-� „ �, r ?� i . .� ., ,; , .. i �� ,., ,. �16 t r k t CITY a PLANNaD DWG EXHI r =, ....._.. .. e. M ) WA �W- i� SLOPE ROOF AND INN' It 'TbWRR E ;'/.. POATW�rr- IJ y� Y CITY °q TITLE. maw RANCHO CUCA."MONGA pckNNNG DiV&UN EXHIBIT.- SCALE" fl 4 -- a a _. a A., Ott a 4 ,.maw. —. _,•`�° —• > � ��_..�_ ,.r .-�a`1 ��'�` , T 4 4 x 1 4a f nR lipr �1 Jt# till a � J MAIN TOWER AT BUILDING C r� CITY C' I. RAND C T f k lNU Awifg 4ocr __ I rd fu WATER MATURE 1 Cam" T -r i r- SEATIto WIEla * R 1 - S4 t 13' C� %iz,6 MAIN PLAZA AT SU tMG C z€11TttJf3E7.E#1�1i've •,p • �, � ', ,' oo AY q• - TERRA VISTA g("SI(IF-S6 FAR ` TCI•i.E , Al ` # E*V F EXHi& ' SCAM U L s (e.) `fie Terra Vista C nity Plan des} .nates at i!.Aa or C. eeh'a�e Ti'a type 8, along ithe tq hire Elft Stt *,et - fr7,nta_.e, and u r A RES01.lw'TIOU OF TitE €r i HO CUCAMOI uA PL,�4tN1 I CO4RMISSILM' APPOOVINe CONCIT AL USE PE J41 `'ftO. 86.20 FA4t Tait: DEVELOMENT 'OF Z ZUSINESS PAIN: DMIS'G'! , )+ Sftt `DUILDIMIS 11 ?ALIN3 1599 „9129 SW ARE FEET W 12.9 ACRES OF LAND, LOCA770 AT NC?P^THFJ,$`r CORNER hF E1Jt S`t'REET, -A* . TOO CF.NTEh DRIV IN tHE f),:FICE PARK pim ic,” Q, THE TEPRA VISTA PLANNED GOKi+%IMY c k0g: wC.77: +4Z1 -06, 1077- ' 041 *i7 R. Recitals. 11 Weste�-Ar Prcpe:-ties has Filed' an,aAj >lication for the isquartte o the Ust Peraiit No. 86 -20 as de2mlbed in Vhhe<stitl_e of 3 Usolctim.. l4areir: er in this Retolutior: that rubject Conditional lase Permit request is referred t6 ar;Nthe applicatg6r,.= {ii) On the 24th of Febrriary, 1998„ fete plann ng Coamaitsion•cf the C`ty Of Ratcho Cucamongw conducted a duly noticed., pahlic hexing o:'► the C application dad eonr:luded said heariq on that (late. (M Mil: legal prereldisi�cs to the adoption or this F"O''utior, °save 01.tmv ed. 8" Resolution. NOW, THER6701E, is is here4y+1 : foond, �dei� lined and rosollfz4 by the �1 Planning Ct�nmiss on rr the_City of Rindno Cucaatanga.As fcilcrol 1. il'd'�s`wa wissioar; €teEeby spec`ifio < ^.11y fends that z; f the facts a Earth in Vie Rec'044, Park , a , o 2, 8asr�j upos� sub tart 'I ) evidence preaeni ed to this CG. x sicn duriq the above- rrferencod tldb'iie htarlgj on February 24, 1938, i, *cTuditg wrilUn and cra: staff ra.potts, togetner With public'' testf�ony, this Coa��i,sion hereby *;puff call;j fin+os as follows: (a) T4ft+ fpplicatitin 3j -11es "to, pvope =ty b6i -pied hy-7erra ,7, Vista Parkway, Chug= h 5trce4, Tom '.t�. , : riv.`� and Etas St-jet with a street frontage of 8,2DO "14-iii t and l at cs r, *, of approximatelyr ; 600' ,feet Wd i, presevV1 S'mnt; end )" e �H to ) t Si;opping center, < property ,to the east is .vdcant : nd the propprty';'o the � � wed�is the Virgi'hi,a Dare _Busi lers Park and ;zrunswkrii beee Ceti( dent"; and 0701-02 21-24-88 PC Agenda 2, of 4 G _ l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLW19);v W. Ct3� 'iii -20 - €hSTERR PAoPSR•hES _ Fet�r'uarSt ., (d) The is«npasad use, building des?'' n, and site pi an, together with the recommended con0tions of approval i are ca�lUtce with the .lerr3 Vista planned Cgcjwjnfty'and all 4-they' apISlicable provis,,ans rf the city standards. 1. Based upon 'the'su4stantial evidence presented to ihTs,r.0n T%;sion during the *bQye_referyan( :ed public hearing and upon the sp.acific findings of facts set forth in pat ag+o-aph, 1 and 2 abate„ Corniisslon hereby finds arid. ,this concludes as follows: (a) That the prop4sed use is in 'accord with tte Y Genevil Plan, - the objectives o•° the: Terry Vista 'Community, _5 PI ar., n.;d and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, c (b) That the proposed use,, AV,4ether with the conditlons� applicable thereto. Kill not be detrimental to the public health, sa €qty, or wet Fare, or cGaterially injurious {,o properties or improveime =Its zn ;hey,vicinity. (c) That the proposed use tom,,.lies with eaCt s " Jin apps cab "e provisions of the Developme)it +„tide and the `Terra Vista Planned Community,, `_: 4. ' Th s Com. ission hereby finds. and certif'ie:. lbtt. Olt project has been reviewed and considered in °compiiancw with the Caliti r.At fnylrormerixal Quality Act of 1974 and, further, this, ,ommis0on hereb; %- 3ues�,a Negative Declaration. 5. Based. 0 _t the fr`ndings and 'l,:onclusions set forth it paragraph 1. 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves fihe application sub*ecti to each and .e-40ry condition se'c, forth ()eiow and in the attached Standard Conditioins attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this reference. r, i ' planning Di+r9sian ,� (1) Additional pedestrian amenities., such as benches ar,d free- standing ;'lirht fixtures shall be provided along Elm Street for the,mrjor greenway trait. A detai4d design of this trail shall be subject to City planner review a64 approval prior to . issuance of ds °uildizig } ire "fits. (2), Pedestrian connections shall �e peovided to the corner's,. of 'gown Center Urine and .krra Vista Parkwa)r 1r and Chui" h Street and Terra Vista 141 ra +• " �, (3) The hariaonta1. rooaf, lend/, or the rear `elev ipn ato�4g the service drive shall`be broken up ',tith �ditional architectural elements, subject to City. Planner review and approval prior to issuance of,buil(' ng permits. F1 y PLMNi6, 4 31'SSION -AR �i.UTION NoI CJP �,0 -� �E WJ PROPERTIES February '24, �' 988 Page -:3 x - ------------ t4) 5pec%al landscape trey rrb shM be prlovided td ? — greet,tway, trail subject to City Planner- review and appivval prior ta,isso=6 of- ,building permits. t5i :The I, �cd�cafG th �� shay "tie' in ith the office park �rageit and the towia center prpiecd�. 16) The textured popment for walkways, and across circOation aisle;, shall be co�tai;ib)e to t awchiitioctural style and shall .have integral colon richness, subject' to i.ity Planner review and 1 appk�tr `1, A full aagzle of this textured pavement hall e submitted to the plar+ntng Division for review and appror31 prior to issuance,of building p¢rmits, (7) A uaf�arm hxrds�:a atid °str.a�' furniture treatment including trash rac��rr�+� `4es, uriic'hos, bike, ranks,, and S" etr., shall be uti +lii�ed,and designed to be cz±sp #tibles with��he -iroitedurif -i- tle. Detailel des%ns 9�agl, be s;t�ttit�ed for Planning'Divislon review and apprival "prior to issuance fof auilding ,permit 4` (8) The site shall he l �Avei� *3edy, and maintained art accordance wiich the ap ved si. Ian which includes architectural' elevati( s, nkte- 6r noterials and colors, lsn4scaping a gr;�ding ors y`ile with the Planning Division, the �eond'tions contained hei^eiii, Develop+aant -Cade regal a ions and L the To,ea Vista Planned Community.. v (gr Provisions for the fa4,_% 6q "design► features in 'the:," trash eaclo ure to The s tisfactirn of the City Planner• ao Architecturally integrated int6 the design of the project. C b. Separate pedestrian access that dries not require { opening the main doors to include self- closing pedestrian dcar. C. Large enpugh to6accoanodate two trash bit's, d. Trash bins with counterttsighted li, #s. e, _,Architecturally treated oveAfiad shatde, ( 0) Graffiti shal l be removed with ?n 72 houvos 6 1� RUNNING COPILSSIOR RESOWZION 1.10. Cli S -d0 �`� SSIERI PRCPERTIE� Febrwiry 24, 1988 page 14 (11,f The entire site',,shali be kept)'i-rae of trash and debris at all tines, 44d In ro eve�;i ;"01 ilrash and debris remain for Wre that twenty-four (24) Impurs. °Engineering Div'rsiorE (?) 3he _fal l owa ng s try cts shal'I bo constructed T wl l ' width For:,the sated limits except that oFt -site, sidewalks a anl� psrkrr ;Y landscaping .. be deferred until. del elpr r►. of the a0acent property,' a. Teem, Vista Parkway from Charch Street to Tuwn Certter'brivey b. Cht9rclh Street from ,haven Avenue to Elm Street; c. EIM avenue 'From ChurcS Street,to Town Center I .Drive, • and l d. Town Center Drive. from Haven Ever to Elm Avenue. " (2) Full ;construction` of trail type G s lip ro gents a < outlined in the Terra Vista Community Plan text, l (3) Only one median opening,,, cOntered R'3 dire proposed ' drivewaj, will he pemittfd along' 'the prcjeCt.; I frbntagas,of.ghurch Street and Terra Vista Parkway. (:4) A portion of tre Stara, drain system 3Tine 1 -3 from leer` Creel, C!&nnel to the intersection of Town Center Drive and Elm Avenue shall be ctnstructed In accordance with ` the approved Terra Vista, Master Plan of Storm Drains 1. prior to occupincy of any buildings. 5. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to adoption of iltis, R+bjution. the �\ APPROVED AND'IWOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY; 1885. E PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RAIICHO CUCAMONNGA 8Y• i tPry T 7M c le M , a-trman ATTEST: 4 �s ra u er, epu 'y ecre a' a r �; cq . _ �° tv,4r 41 b �t ;!s 14. f+; .T �ai t�r g '•s All Ya .. 11 ju rM FA,�'�j .'R..T i J 73 ,j { j�i.ri ig" , Lit Lap j w r $ qcs yy� st �r S w i Pl $ jt'l hit ° 9,11 MIX Z s sit g Z - tj Kta a� }yi ys tt Y gg.. !w .,.. ., .. n �:�. -�► ' fit' .. _« , ._. —, �. Orlq�vd Poor "Quo M r � "a Y i � a toll W 3-1 u Y j, Y q u1 e ll Qii p� r r- k k� � tl y vk tnp ww r Hs ( j, 6 a+ _� i� td e N IN Tr alts *Ila A I mz 7� r� g 'g r$$ 111 N_ Srw AY� rrpAIt ZZ Igw $,a r tz if ZZ 1, a N $- iQy1MYw VAVR 4 Y 6w lob ,sw y!%�V MewpL� ��{ Aya��'.u�.. to au bw.w.n <NU .iI Ms+t 4l.,R. rK .. s _rte•* J� :j i J%j its ,QS_sI As M " V + gal$ `' ` "�:•" its q 4 "atZ ✓�� Z. do w �� »�� "�: •�/r- pra$� "� ��M,l-� �.. j a $}. s ;s6 ° ✓' M _r E� C Il • i p N 12 4 Pax IP r ,Y `qpp � ..t �� ` e.. �.�lwr7� ■�`i�.Y� i r 'is �L�a Why i A N Frii ✓ Vl M pMit ✓sy a > caw "u�� r a 6N tr R. iir, or� a� sit 9 lL Ito ..�� •�.� � �� w `�� gam~. 8� ` }�� `�� J N fl , •�V 1i 9 Y SiT UP Lj sn M ^ sM V <{ d0 yWVf� "4 tN "Q iii R r 51 teyee••=_ I}W�— . t irwM ��{{ ia. i6♦y.: iris 'ss``.dZ i'ow ACal °s `a Mxa ;;ice .E °o < w3 $b '.i.°.•� T, 4s Q' N. 0lT b�Y�•�i. V�� I ,�C•�•S!. »,-`"Y =�� igl��y, oN MM6 JqO.. 4�6 ,�{y�jj :`C[".Y« .� «�5r4i tl a�iK f 1 m� , Zj i7 •..nfi �id NI "° wMq• `•QY YLLr ',\ Oil • 10 � «! Ypg7 r'YY�� ap M a 7 V J 4r�rY � ``« I! {► Yq Aslim� MAI7 A 's S, i M$ w z a. E ax g IL e u u Jj- i� j--. q w s> tY ' tau � N r its Drgaq Ict. c`g q" eN i�q L « U ^ �N •YR �� M0.t b� OY NS Al WAD bW►.v ilkg�.: "', s =$ 1 exr iv- ° = g ;,tg • '' o 1. g tz ;1 1. 1 ;; w 't '' IL Z4 SA �. HIM. a , x N ag :gig !as a' Val 3 ^ # fal r ot Y rs Ylr tic = � Is� µ ni ~ M N 4 Atka Z a3` 'Y I ° N a "pr"'�: Mw4t�� "� -4. lit Y - � � r 4110% Y, \, � 4!, V m ',... N , y� �9 •• i r r� Y N if M N rb t N ak �a •.? . #� g TZ -r It U Y lit �YO p Fie Y°t x ' �. V b W M.g IY ° id °1 �i31p �P b jlf Y N ff gi u V at V x f. Y 3 � VT �w 14 ,,1 a tt AK R da ` 11 �1��F _ti ZWWWW ♦ Y »li uN, Y iszt ' L 1u °V $ tit It -0$ qis� � %ggib_ y� ['In t•. �¢ Y.g w Y3.WY A► Gl.W t N ak �a •.? . #� g TZ -r It U Y lit �YO p Fie Y°t x ' �. V b W M.g IY ° id °1 �i31p �P b jlf Y N ff gi u V at V x f. Y 3 lip �s » W t a v Bi f "0 " � ; r 4 � » b T � VT �w 14 ,,1 a tt pp � R da ` 11 �1��F Y. ZWWWW ♦ Y »li uN, Y �qS 1 A► �Y+y a le.� lip �s » W t a v Bi f "0 " � ; r 4 � » b T � VT �w � e plp iCA� ` 11 O� Y �Y V' a a �m Jos s.: g �Y I a] i. w Y M bq j2 = i Zx bf It X Us rE a i_00 'a r bb N � J 12 er.. it r _ �w �6 �o ,w Y «« j 3 ZAM .N+ A R yy� (j DATE: To- FROM: BY. SUBJ"CT: ENVIROMi f�X ASSESSMENT A� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT W02 e r q u sl; to ep a [i fi' a c 1 r..tra` chic c n c in a k siia--�A pace of 6,011, square feet within a iwlti- tenrl't industrial dentg, r ini. the Industrial Paxk District (Ubar,ta 6) 1 ocate3 at`, 28',Utica Avenue 201- -342 - 1.8, v 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIC�NL n A. Action Requested: Approval of a non - construction Condit:ional Use ern o estahlish a chiropractic clinic wittki an U existing Industrial park located at 8666 Utica Avenue (Suite E. Surroundin2 Land Use snd 2onin or cn vacant, 'R'�FCt.r en.er; Industrial Park /Haven Avenue Overlay District South - Vacant, Inditstriall Industrial Park/Haven Avenue Overlay Dierict East - Vacant; General ndustrial " West - Vacant; Lrf ytr al Park�Haven Avenue Overlay District C. Genera. Aran Desi ations• FT-17-Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East General Industrial West" - Industrial'` Park- D. Site Characteristics: The proposed use is located within, an ex s ng n ustffaT --ark along which includes a varlmty of uses �} (see Exhibit "C ")A The site is not presently fully occupied. 0 Ci j J ITEM. G. i 1 i two additional parking spaces, ,, PLANNING MWISSION" STAFF REPORT CUP 88-02 - Otis February 24, 19 ;s8 Page 2 E. Parkin Calculations: ?4a 5 �` y, � - Number of. -, Number of Type % Square Parking a spaces ', .Spaces Use Footgg patio R$t 1red Provided Building 3: Hansen`s Yard Maintenance 2,450 ",'I /400 4 4 ', Banfill Drywall 1,8 ?5 111000 2 2 , *Proposed.Altis Chiroara4tic Clinic - 6,037j- 1/250 30 28 Total 36 34 F. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Specific Flan (Subarea ! l 6) Allows Icallhea th care facilities, subject to the � ~T approval Conditional Use Permit by, the @tannin Commission. 7 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The chiropractic clinic wil'have office hours Monday t5rough Saturday. in the .morning avid early afternoon and evenings Monday through Friday (see Exhibit "A"). Presently, the clinic,wili operyte with one doctor and one employee. The clinic may "expand to wo doctors and five employees. B. Issues. The primary issues related to locating this type of use hin an industrial park setting are co"atibility with surrounding businesses and park availability. availability.. Based upon the current occupancy within to cerster (see Exhibit; "C") compatibility conflicts are not expected. Based +s"'cn. the proposed square footage:_ of 6,037; the chiropractic clinic will require 30 parking spaces U space per 200 square feet). Building "3" provided one spade per 300 square feet, totaling 40 spates for the building. The drywall company and the yard maintenance shop require six pausing spaces. The natant 2,712 square feet of the building will also require six parking spaces. The chiropractic clinic is allocated 28 parki -;g spaces; however, 30 spaces are ?required. Therefore, staff recommends that the tenant be required to, cover a roll -up door and stripe the;exttr�or loading space for two additional parking spaces, ,, c �} LING C'OWISSIOW STAFF REPORT CUP 88-02'. Al tis Fibruary 2�, 1988 Page 3 _ Tire! Foothill Fire Protraction District has raviewitl this aPpllcatton',and find$, no problems with the estabYisha�it of a chiropractic facility (see Exhibit "ll!] "i. C. Env ronmtental Assessment: UpQ.q review of Part I of the Initial Study ana c mmp etitq "uy -part t j of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a chiropractic clinic Iodated within this ir4usviaL,center. III. FACTS FOR F1#DIWS: 6, 1. That the proposed use is in accordance writs$ -he &nerbl Plan, the objective of the De"lo Industrial specific Plan1uba tin vftiin ahem iss loca edd.. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or wterially °injurious to Properties or rovement in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with =each of the applicablo provisions of the Industrial Specific plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE., This item has bteg advertised as a public hearing tnR roe ,-,e rt newspaper. PropertY posted and notices sent to p p ,Y owners Xjthin 300 feet of the project. V. RECO161ENDATIONs Staff recommends appKAval of the Conditional Use Rmit an $_5MACe;,nf a egati've Declaration. Res li;f su tted iCfty r Pl ' nor BB:CK :vc Attachments Exhibit "P - Letter, from Applicant Exhibit "8" - Memorandum$ from F'oothil'l Fire lbiistrict„ Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" Floor plan Resolution of Approval with CWitions „1.,.3 1�ri x, commercial broker, Jari azy 14, VOSS C,: S:, C 'YANG; 0 w"[J t PLMING Le.�Zraad Rltcho '- UCWAOn9a. f Cif, 91730 To v'.6% it may_ C+onoomt { '.Tine l acAtiop is being leased for the cizira ,�aat:�.a *"It*. That 40ptr€�tion eorwjaa of one d tier " and p.se eo€;pltsyeaa at this �im�c. ?Stty e��a two do ors and fives {loye Individual bse� of . �apreati�. has I ix�aiBIISrld dfl81d & ry7; .sign will be1� @ ��foo �a� thG,;�,Fi�k:a i and tits i�ie wi+t :l ixiai itij rieas. ctf ;ti�a tzo tr , wi bea ft.- .+t Y, S .. 2. pmf. 4;30 10- .00p..',�'t "4..k%�4 am 12 PIA,, 3.3 i3 --. 20 pvt fWdrtssday � a� r� Z2 =jam, 3 t ' �+ tt� A4; ' Thursday - 8 am � Noon Saturday - a to i too pa,, p lr r= y a R William <; « ' Alt-3 �f 1 _ a t AAVf NVq ITEE2 'Rs NC�JOCCjC6Wi6p,4GsA,rQAt{FORNIA AN4 'ial9E ti l P:0. BOX 3$r 6 "3 AMffHYV St. ot" fi�K7 Ct "IMI jNGA'9MI =Z�IPJ1 i I February 8, tj8e _ Q i nt ji Cgrhia S. Ki r.'{ salstan4 .annex r ety or ft P40. @ox T Rancho Cucantongi, CA 'a1,'�30 RE: CUP S"i (AM's) Dear Ms. KIn' Yh+a Foot I Fire I3Fsit`3ct,lii�ds� s,, f,4! nt ,CWevt prowams with the jlox of tha° apxa ttr � { b it 8823.'' I Tha .iAtt;ic rrraazci be consil� rod a B -a' off c�jcuF>rn rr requiring FW)) peciat Stale Firs tiiarah8f 4odes i#trinti4n, Thank yes for alloviirg uii "8"sass lisis matt er. 1 Vera A. Arthur, 5$. Fins Praventian�ciati5t VAAlrb a v Attachment i 1 , `, iii r SOO NO o- H f , CITY tom' � �'► �' =� s; RANCH. CCAt: _ = PLANNING DIVA _ IR = � . L ScAa �--- � - ARRSORG'iIXON OF HE RANCHO CLPCM49W,,A PtAli�fli'4e C(Mlssff OVI"p�L';;, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 88-02 FOR CHIRGPRA�'i'IC. CLINIC LOCATED it 806 UT16tJS€iITE 800) IN THE INOUSTRIAL PKV DIVRICT (SUBAREk &) A. Recitals, d Y William Allis Sas filed an applicaLic j, y �surinGe of the 4onditiona�i Use permit 88-02 as described of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resol ratio no the st.�jec,t 6&mw+`�joval Use Permit re(West fis referred to as "the app11catl;6n'. I „ fil;1 On the 24th of February, Ig88,, the Plann ng Co aiss�`o � taf the 4: City of Rarcha Cuc",onga conducted a -duly noticed public hearing gtr,the Application and Concluded. said hearing on that date, All legal prerequisites to the adoption hags occurred. of thfi ,; , , ReAitiAn { t B. lie of irn, Ti�ili, 1lfER FORt, it is beraby found, det njn ,ned.,and resolved by the Planning Co nission of the City 6f Rapcho Cucaaaonga as f+o}lowsR Aft 1. bl Commission hereby .specifically 'finds fitat all of the facts set forth Ott the Recitils,, 'Part A, 61f this. Resolution are true and correct. c=ased upon substanval evidence t,L. ,, ��. . tkis GaMatissiQrr ' during the above- referenced public' hear' on Fabr�tary 2a, It�88,; including written anti oral staff reparta, �cgc er -%%&th public testimony,' this . Comaission hereby speciffically find; as ffbq?(ws (a) The application app le to propar "Y °dated at 8655 Utica (Suite 800p which is a suite located in ahk exisping i,iO i-tenarrt induxtriat building with 40 parking spaces; and t f (b) Toe property tai the north of the su',Ject site is vacant, the property to the south ' of that site = Consists of _indastrial building, the ;( prOPerty to the east fs vaca13, arnri the property-to she Nest is varrantr aid ; (c) 'the- droposed xae would,reguire 30 parking spaces; whereas, .only 28 spaces are ,available, 3. Based upon tht sub ;tantial evidence presented to thjs o is iori during the above - referenced public hearing any u et1 the, specific findings of facts set forth in ;paragraprr,I and 2 abov i e, thi COWS hereby finds and eoncldes as- follows;al i' . I ,. PUAMIN& COMFtISSION R OW1'ID i Flq� - ,; CUP, 88-02 -y. AltiS February 24, 19 .r i (a) lbk the proposed usg is, in �,Ct;arrf,. ►,t sf� site t,enera,r. Plan, `� ab�tives ai; too ji+dustrij2 `ir -'r Y Area: Spay #t?ic }lan --1110 the atympases of cite 1) disi:rF t in t+hJ.h the, Sf.'is 1�aldtec 01 Tae. the p11040sed t+ ther with the conditions apglicabtd N errtoi; will not be ! r#mental tp the tubl itn ttat!' f „fit, safety, ar �`ar8r Or sleatLri4l`t' frdoriot�s to properties or ikVrrJvCrXS in S£ Yi.inity. #oi *it the prtrpnsfed osO each 01 the applicable 'prorrta#'ons of •the,, Industrial' Area. �. sPecific. Plarr< f 4, This C faatart hr reby fi ds and sjr�jfies that the - project has been reviEwid and consfdetae;3 ill coeliac: wtl te alfurnf EWrow4entQt21 ity Act of 8tnd fortrerY al tilts t*omfs {,tan ilter� y ISSUE.$ ,a 14004t4ve J used u n fire f tndirrgtr and cork ust0"s set forth in paragraph i, 2 and 3 above, this CaWa..tan he:reb,f app fires the appli,cktton- su�eei ��: each and ev rz! ccndit�iun set forth b4ow vend #n the attathed Nect } Conditions a :ached hereto And Incorporated hzr.'sin by this ,raference� \ Coed ditio'rs, ,t 4I ?-; Approval at this t regtresr shall rtpt waive compliance with all . sections cf the Yndw; trial Ar*4 'Specific Plan, and all other^ City.ordinances. (2) I�tz tn� ap °r ation Of the „facil qty causes ddverss ' effet~ts upon a cent )usi,seswes or opoati a -Cup 68-02 AItis , Page -. 3, -V, V f8� Torta r %prqu(ftnts shall imludd pew anentl' covering' the roll-, up door on the interior and striping, Mile ei terror loadin? ';az *ea for two additto"O, gerk,ing spaces,,, 6. The dept;r Secretary tIo this Ca srjq� '�Irall ` certify tp adoption of this R €solution. AP ROVED AWI DOP5' Ii#I 24,114 DAY Or FEWWARY, PiAil NIN CC?rM ISSOJt,N iiIE CITY, OF MCI CUC#MGA farrw T, rr� B U eJ y pu y cre Fy {.„ i, A, Bra; �11er, Deputy Secretary of Plfnning Coaati�sia�te City of 1 Rancitib L�rc A, 'do leroby certify 'that. thi oregoing R ioluti"on was uu1y and, ( regularly ntr°oliuced, p�sui:t�, and adopu�d'it he= 1pn ' R Caa i'ssicn of :.. I City of Rancho Cucamattgaj at a reguTIO *eetjO4 �f the PI nfhg Cor�a#s ,$ion 6te`ld I bn the Roth- day of Febru it, d 1988, by the fol lowing Vote „ o•wft „> CT�?iS1O43WR$: 1 ROSS: ° �t tom. e y x ` -- - CITY OF 9 NCHO CF)CAfl+XONGA STAFF REi3ORT DATE., February 24, 1988 �, �� , z TO: chairman and Members of the Planning Comaission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: `'tynthia 'Kinser', Assistant Planner SUBJECTr EtNVIRO?XHTAL ASSESSW14T AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT a3-,04 -� TRADITfiSM WIC • a,reques o es a sin a 5—ra 'e sc oo n a ,ease space of 3;'m square feet within <5 an existing multi -- tenant fndustria4 center, in the Gener a' _ Industrial District (Subarea 2) located at 9057 Arrow Route,- APN 209- Q%2 -19'. ; I. PROJ5CT AN© SITE DESCRIPTION'" & Action '€a uesteft Approv*1 of a non-construction Codditional use to stablish, a karate SO-91 Withia an existing Oult,- tenant industrial - center locat.b -lat �i4Q57 arrow Route, Sultes 150 and 160. B. Surrounding—WO ltsa• and " ZoE paor B - n , eir , 7� � a ; pedi m Residential (8-14 diA0.r nq urns per acre) South Ya #nt, Industrial dui'Idings,; Generxj Industrial' East / /Vacant, Industrial Buildings; her;'.il Industrial West Industrial ,Bui'ld'ings; General Industrial C. Gene, a6lan Design atftns. _ ool` ., - snare n ustrial 'NorW' - Mediuta Density Residential (8-14, dwellIng units per acre) Seth - General Industrial E East Genera? Industrial West General Industrial U. Site Characteristics: The !oposed use is located within an 6; e s ng mu - e`r!ant Indus Ral tenter ;which is, primarily vacant, E. Parking C'a')culaticnt': � � Number of Number of Type Square marking Spaces Spaces of Use cotag Ratio . Required" Provided Flex Trim 2,400 11400 G Proposed Karate School --,3,084 113 students 1l instructor .__.._.__7 10 l:S ' H PLANNING COMISSIOR STUFF REPORT CUP 88-04 TRADITIONAL MERICAN KAftAM February 24, 1988 pa§o 2 F. .A� l_.icablo Re u`tations:' The-"InAusV,41 Specific Pti`an (Subatea recrea a"%i nTfacilftiea subwect to the approval`of,,a CiYnditiortal Use Permit by the Pla;nfng Commission. 11. ANALYSIS: U A. General: The proposed karate school will operate W*hday a5"uc "Friday from, la A.M. to J;SO P.M. and Saturdasys, 4 :R.M. to, & PX The nWori&,v of the instr-action will take place in the evening h6rs.and on, Saturdays. There willj�be a maximum of E 2 e�ployees and 15 students on the site at xnciva�t time (see Ex�:i:bllt W). [ ff, % Issues:' The primary issues ,slated to locating this tyre of j� use-Vthin 'an industrial setting are compatibility with surrOu -aJiny buxinesses and parking availability. The maiority of %-e center -is currently vacant. Pccasiopaliy, students will make- a short, but intense, yell to produce power when practicing punches, blocks or taking a puncl.. The building constrc:ction should provide a(kquate noise attenvation (see r� Conditions 2 and ral. The bulk oaf the idstructIbn 4ctivity within the proposed karate school is expected to occur +luring the evenings and or, weekends. Therefore, : ,.onflicti Ara not expectiM to <bccur. The karate school will have, two instructors and 15 students ,at any g•¢ven Mime The Development :Code requires, one parking space per :three students, plus one space per, inrttructor for commercial ,.schools. This results in a requirmeot for seven parking spaces. The current on -site parking of nine space for this Unit would therefore be adequate to accommodate she use. � The = btithill Fire Protection District has reviewed this applia :ation and requested additional information {sea Exhibit 1/ III. FACTS FOR FINDDINGS: 1. Thal, the proposed use is in accordance with the General Flan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan subarea in Which the site is located. 2. i'hat the proposed use will not be detrimental t6' the I!ublic health, safety, or welfare, or materially •anjgrious to properties or improvements in the 4ricinity. 1 'that proposed -use complies with ea ^h Of the - op pi icab �r ro\visi ons of the Industrial Specific Plan. a� r, PCANW1%-UO4lIS IOM STAFF REPORT CUP 68-04- TPA ITIONAL A{�iE3t�CAN k. RATE February 24, IS' Page la IV. ' CORRESPONDENCE: This item. has bees � dvirhised as a pwblic hearing ry a __ �AM��0,_��,II�'e art news�lper, the property posted, and notices sent to Mprowrry owners within 300 i'eet of the project. t V. Ri OPIF�fiNi3kTI0lt used . ut,on 'the above analysis and facts for a la 3n , s f � recomiierds the Planning . Commi,1sion, approve r Conditional Use Perot , _ 04 through issuance of a Wegative tM R �f claratia crid;n end adopt attazhed Resolution. f Res p lly submitted, „ \\ F r 1 r l Cityo PI onier 1� ✓� c: l 53•CK :te Attachments: Exh) bit "A" - .Letter ApRl icant ExWhit "B" - Mworan frog Foothill Fire District Exh ibit NC" - location Map s Exhibit k0" - Floor Plan Rest I ution of 1�pproyal o ,1:5 1 AuSSfNGO twvasrMENTCOnsPANY aanuaiy 27, 1988 Ms. Nancy Fong !' 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 -C Bastline�. Itd, P.C:- Box 907 Rancho cucamon I : a x, orn a `1730 RE: AxiROW Us mss PARK ` Dear Nancy: G Attached please find a Conditfpnal.Us* PerMit Applic tion for a tenant who would like �$ lccata wia,,hin the ' ow Business Park. We wish 'to allow Floyd Burke, ownf� of Traditional Amarican Karate, to locate; his# burliness within Building 6 of our protect. Under the conditionally permitted uses for sub Area 2, thin would fall under this category of recreation facilities. _ the tenant WOW, like to leases ar- PXOXimately 3,840 square feet within rl our pro j ect. As you can sea frO7, the attached tenant improvement plan, then improvements required are Crary; ;similar to those of a standardl light industrial cps=ir 4f Floyd Burke is a-ydixg time resident 6,:1 the. -city -of Rancho C%camonga a�'� has operated businesses within the City during the paGrz three years. The hours of operation for :pis Traditional Anerican Karate stadic are as follows; Monday through Fridays 10 :00 a.sn. - 9 :30 p.m. Saturday: 9 :00 a.z. - 5:00 p.m. Closed Sunday It is important,,to note that, due to the fact that thin is a classroom situation, the,�majsrity of the traffic to his business is in the evening hours and currently has a wxv4smi- s .— weekends. Floyd aneouv v. T a stu ends tend a young In age an therefore do not utilize tt� \sir own yehicies in order to attend classes. Appro imats ,� M of the studs! are [� / i! Ca 4P71,4 714,474.1300 - nninc 71,4 Ms. Hancy Ponq Pla Department partmeztt. - laruary 27, 1988 rage Tiro dropped off and pic%ed up by �rxants and /or carpools. Floyd. clogs not A064) any additionnl parking (OVer 1/400 sq, ft.) to operate Ais business. Floyd has chosen to ' "to in our project for a number of reasons. Primacrily, our location offers him close proximity to tli,a *lesidential lease of the City of Rar..cho Cucanonga. Secondly, the,sccess afforded ,_a 11insyird and Arrow Route are also necessary to his business. Additionally, rloyd'lfeels that that location #crass - from Bear Gulch Dark in conjunction with the alordability of the space and the quality of the davelaisaent are also reasons for lj►ca►tinq at the Arrow Business Parr. . have included the following items, with this letter for this Conditional, Use Permit Application Er your checklist: I. Uniform Application 2. ]dart I of the initial Study._ 3 Four (4) '- 8 1 /24 k li" sit* planes and four (4) 8 5./2" x 11" tenant improWniont: floor plans. 4. This letter 5. Five (5) sets of gummed labels for notification of applicants �• Three (3) 90ts of gummsd labels for public hearino�' notification, 3. A chuck in the amour`, of $485. 00 to oover the i filing fees for both tAo Conditional Use Permit and the Initial Study. Your assistance $,A prq�cosx g this Conditional Use Permit Application is greatly app ciateci, Should you have any questions or comments+ 'regarding this application please feel free t contact men directly. Cologiall y, 3o n E. Aschierf4B Director Acquisitions and Marketing , CC., Floyd BurksfTiaditional American Xazate Dougasll Agan /Stephan Daniels Cammeroial Brokerage MfSS(h6#)NVt5TMENiC0ft%NY " TnIW IMISTRY-7 P. O. SOX aS • "23 EME'FHYST St, • itaNCHO CUCA MONGA g170i 714i'�ki� -�33'� Pebvuary 8, 1981 r ° Cynthia S. Kinter, Atsistart Planner City of Rancho Cucat!vanga P.O. Box $07 Rancho CucamongaP CA 91r O RE, CUP'88- 04ITraditional American Karai4t Dear Ms. Kinsew: The proposed karate school3preftnts sonw tpeciat fire code row ,,tments, ?! j as it appears it may be a public assembly (A -Q +occc y , As specific dimes signs #ro not shown on tixt sit e�sv� mltted anti* yoU reiiva;t, detailed respirements cre not aivail+� hit time. however, special consitlM90n mast he given to California Administrative Code (T -19) reyeair ments far an A. -9 occupancy. Please requira the applicant o st*41t1i "teas to th,9 office prior to CUP app06vai and occupancy. y j Thank your* oppar to sss this matter, Sincerely, ; I Vera A. Arthur ,Fire Prevention Specialist VAAlrb Attachment Pit i 11 t 12 4 iSees� eoseeoeao fit fit tic A ps ty fit t 46OV4�zv, its ARROW BUSINESS PAnK •"5 �l14F =FO GYGIIMl10A. CA:t /OM�RA O�M�� ,�An�►Ci�[6AfiiiSi:lTiq�MNI.. 1 `_ ft' :` �\� UU�` '�'"'= Rb�-�° v �� ! � r ,�i .�,. _ .. RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTI'10N OF THE WCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING tomisSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PM IT NO. x8-04 FOR A MATE SCHOOL i:bE'tlei3 AT 9057 ARROW R09TE fISUXTES, 15C ANO 160) YN E GEN�i#AL 1iDU51i£IAw DISTRICT (S r�lBtEA ��. - AM- 209-012-19 A. Recitals. (i} F1oy Burke has filed all applicatibn fop tno issuance of the Conditional Use Pe.rMit No. ,86 -1)4 as deicriWl it tine 4�,fit-ie of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this, Re Ution, the s�i��Act Conditional Use Pamit request, is refirred to gas ="ihc application ", (ii) the 24th -of peb nary" 1958, brie i�7aat n CoMfssion of the City of Rancho ucmnga Cori t;ed a duly notiotd , On the application and concluded said heayking Ott that date, Mil All le §al prerequisites` to the adooVen 6 '' this Resoluf ion have wCCUrred. B. Resolution. Aft NOW, THEREFORE, It As fie by found, d6terWhed and rk;olved. by the Planaing Commission of the Oita 6V honcho, Cucamonga as fO17"ss i.. This-Commissi fl hereby specifically finis that. all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, part A, of tE }is Resolution are true -and correct. 2. Based capon sdbstmotial evidence presented to, this Cormss�Qen during the above- referenced public +- .earing on Mwuary 24, 1988, including wrfitten and Viral staff t'epor9ts,_ tdreth:er withl public* testimony, this Commission hereby cpecVMcally finds z:s - follows- (a) the av licatfon applies to property,., 70; ;�ted at 9057 Arrow Route (Suites 156 and 1601; and (b) The propakty to the north of the subject site is apartments-and hear. Gulch Park, the property to the south of that site consisty of industrial buildings and vacant land, and the properties td the east west are industrial buildingp 3. Based upon the yubstaatial evidence presented to this.zoma�issinn during the above•re erenced pubtrn -; earing and upan the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 4 .`above, this Gr�tnission hereby finds and concludes as follows. (a) That the propo is nAe- a in accord with the General Plan, the tMee ,yes of the Develop ent € Ode, and the ptirposes ,o "tha` district iflr-xeFiiCh �Q thesr� -? sated r . PLANNIM COMMISSION RMILVITON NO. CUP rB-04 • TPA ITIONAL AJIF41CM `KMTE PC`1 -54ry 24, 1VA, Page 2 (r3) drat tthe prvwel -use, together with the kivi condits, appliciblr% thereto, ti111 'not bt datritierntal 4.6 the public h heaT ,' safety; or. 1 w€alfa +°e�, or mater,ally.injurio�as'to propereties igarovements qrx in the vicinity. (c) That proposed use compIllet with each of- the aprplic4ble provisions of the,:Development Code. d. phis Cc i ss on hereby finds and certiffell that the: proiect':,,has III been reviewed and consil eyed in c xliance with the i a ornia (environmental if Quality ,;;t of 1 10 and further,, this Coa�ission � ��b� assures a .NagaIive' Declaration. 11 � 5. 9ased upon the i �dinns andtonplusion,4 set firs, In paragraph 1, Z and .3 above, W C owiss�on .herby approves the App li subject tsx Aed eacl. and eveiy cone, on sef' forth below and in the ' Standard 1 Conditions aitached. hereto and incorporated hetkin by this ce. (1) Approval of Chic request shall not waive cmipliance , with all sections of the Industrli.�- -Area Specific -; P1G:, and all other City ONInances. (2) if the ibperatfon of th facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent ,businesses or,: operati.�ns, Including, hut. not 71mi�)d �, �►cise, the Conditional li use Parboil all 'be brought before ti;* „'Planning COM14sic��Y for the consideratio'h and possible termination of the usc,. i (3) D=panq of . tlhis facil ity shall not commence until sucti time af;' Al Uniform Bulldilffig—'Code and Stater� ' Fire Ma.•shallrs .rergulitions have been complied_- with. .Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted = to the, oothill Fire Protcction Districf end the ; Building and Safety Division to show co`ia(iliance, ;. The Wilding shall be inspected ficir compl,ionce priayt^:, to occupancy. (4) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformane with the CosrprehensiYe Sign Ordinance, any uniform Sign Program for the comps °rx, and shall r6quire revs *w and approval by �he Planning Division prior' to installation.. (5)` the facility shall A6 operated, in with ,conformance °the performance standards fW Subarea 6 including} , but not limited top opise IQVeTs = X6)1' :Ibis Conditional Use Pet*it is� a0roved for a ma�cimura of two,' -.and &tudents at any. given time. „2? ``� . . ,r CITY OF VCuo CU9}'' -. Cam§ STAFF REP'0jrj,_j' t> lk I DATES Febhrjali I9BB 1977: TO Chaiman}-fand Members of 'the Planning Commissior, FROM: Brad 01.1ler City'. ��anner r° BY _ Bak Coleman, seniors Planner SUBJECT: C•'NVIROWIENilL ASSESSMENIT, AND VICTORIA CCO �UHITY PLAN eENil1 r proposa: o amen e Victoria upinunify Ran eiKt t!) require a Conditional psi: Permit for shopping centers and certain commercial uses. ENVIAANMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA CCi 1tDIITY PLA'k proposal I amenr a er��f v s o aamun y an ext ito require a n Conditional _Ilse' Permit for shopping centers and certain comma rcial Uses. { I. BACKGROUND. This amendment is the result of a P1anni,4rg Commission 1 an z Fv ouncil requests trl;1aqu re Conditional Use Permits for i shopping centers within ,yj foria and Terra Vista. The primary purpose is to bring the approval process for shopping centers within the two planned" comrwwnities into consistgncy with the Development Code requirement for a CUP process for sh'bpping centers which applies throughout the rest of the City. II. SCOPE OF AMEJIDMENT: Th1s arerdment "would: I. Require a CUP for' shopping centers within thQ• Victoria and Werra Vista Planne. Comities; and 2. %ke minor atrt� fcfJmentS' to certain use regulations �' gain internal consistency. III.ANALYSIS: j A. General Shopping cents � within Terra Vista altd V'Ictoria' are t su ec to tha DeveSopTT nt Bedew process. A Conditional Use Permit was not originpy required for shopping Centers in the two plar)ne'd communities because it t:as felt that the 1r�and use compati6iiity issues could be adequately addressee!' through the $'and use. planning of the Community Plans. ffb�iever, the City Council recently developed conditions of approvIl to govern the' operation of shopping centers and to mi,tigati% envirooilental ITEMS I, a .i /j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF?, RVORT ' VCPA 88-01 - City of Rancho Cucamonga,j TVCPA 8841 - City: of Ranchb'Cucanofija• February 24, 19ii8 :_„ A . Pagt 2 \ effects which . are desirable' to apply. to all shopping c gters wfthin the Ciitiy, Ilia scope and oatu►e of conditions WA ca r be applied under '',the Ponditignal , use Pe,,n�ait proces ,/ s g. greater than that allowed .law under the Deve'�o�� Fev�f process. 5. W_hy RagQirP. a CUP? - 'There �e several reasons wh a o�icn i io�ai�1sse" rm t / centers; process /i5 desiralale .nr shgpaing /, 1. Public Review A CU"as a noticed public hearin; as required -by state �Iaw� The Development Code states it bey t: Th.s# conditional Use Perafi� process is 1 Intended tct" afford an oppbrtunity for ;broad public revier: and evaluation of these " req,Irements and charactOistics, to provide" adequate miv -'stion of , any ' adverse impacts, and to ure that all site developwt /) ro,,:.�at;ons and perfornc standar:s are provided in compiianc;e Kith the Development Code, Staff reels that it is appropriate to "PeWir''e`a Conditional 31se : II Permit,prot74ss for projects with the scale and intensity of a shopping cuter Wclt can significantly impact the surrounding G neighbor'' qd. H 2. Ctinditions of Approval - The type of conditions that ran be, applied to. a Conditional Use °errjit, which is a discretionary action With. regard to Uk, Is much broader than 'those WIC , may be- applied o a Development Review application. The Planning Ceam14 si'on's discretion on a Gdvelopment Review application is generally,,, imited to matters "of - design. Durfi *,`their review ofF ,the NuWest shopping center, the City,tuuncil established" conditions of approval regulating ,�security, hours, maintenance or other characteristics "of operation which could not have ,;been Imposed on a Development (view application. j.,e 'Council indicated that these, conditions should be applied i,oOnsistentl,r on all "shopping .centers within the, City< 3. P� riodid' Review - The Cttit =- y �C. C fission authority I Process gives ��. Manning re i oke a CUP, "to periodically revie�ly sradiflr or lT+ pursuant to Development Code Section 4.Q30G. The tomaiiss =,- -an" may perio- dically' review any CUP. to ensure that it is being operated in Ua manner eon Ittent with condition$ of appproval or in of manner i is not detriment 1,10 the public health, safety, or ,� �. PLANNING COWISMOR STAFF REPORT _ LL VCPA 8841 - City, of Rrncho Cucamonga TVCPA 88-01 � Cityy f nchp_Cucamo Februaryr24, -4985, N) -..._ _ Page -s KI which is not detrimental tit the public health, safety; or welfare, or materially Qurious to prop roes in the vicinity, i the'Com*ission finds than the, CUP is not being cmrrmduc Rd 'in an a ropriate manner pots conclusion of a l;ublic earing, th n the ronessiom array modify the conditions approval or rev >ke the C The former Boar's Head.4as, An,axamaple of 'CUP which required review and modification as a result of problem with the operation of tote bar (i,-e. oise, toiteringt tirmg, littering, otC.k. Ili. APPLICABILITY: The ` ierva, Vista Commrm{inity #Mats designates one communi (TUD-regiona l3 shopping centy and two ridghborhood shoppin(,-, center sites. The Terr4y, Nitta Village neighborhood, shopping center,, located at HaVtt mnd Base Line,' is tinder construction. 14 addition, Terra Visl, has sev,&ii areas along, Foothill Boulevard designated for a mix of commmmetrelal, office .and residentiaT, usds, the VIctorU Coemnity Plan designates �hres neighborhood sho -pining center sites (called "Village Coi*ercial ") for which no application ` hake been submitted to„ �;te. The Victoria Gardens (� regional small is also located within d ictoria ar;d is required to i obtain -a 'Conditional Use Permit u±ft'l the terms of the ;'OE mer Pare` cipatip Agreement. 5urroundi gjhm mall are approximately 206'mres o Regionally Related commrct�l land. m neither the Terra Vista nor the Victorii Community Plans define a � shopping center;.,, hence, the Revelopo,�nt Code definition would apply« SHOPPING CENIER« A group�of comwreial establishments; planned, developed, owed, or -Rmnsoed as a unfit, with off- street parking provided an the cite. Therefore, the following districts are affected by this proposed - TERRA VISTA Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Commercial (C) Commmtmnity Commercial W,1) Recreational-Commercial (Re) Mixed Use Financial, Restaurants, Residential (MFC) Commmmercial, Office, Residential (MOC) lospita% & Related Facilities, Offices, Cosmnercial (MHO) PLANNING COMISSIOW ,'STAFF REPORT YCPA 88-01 - City 'of Rancho Cocamng$ February 24 -1Q38 Page 4' t VICTORIA , Village C rcial (Y) �. Region "elaied Office /comrciai (lap,) . Regioewrtenter (n) E This amendment wouletl, ;change the regulations for all of these districts JpJess otherwise. spK. tiled fa the ordinance,. this amendMen r i'he an, pro$ect for whith a Wilding per i has 0t been issued by ,he effective 'date of the ordinance to rktaf.n reviev And approval Of,a,Conditianal Use penait. -The following or similar language casild be inserted into the ordinance to exempt approved project The provisions of this ordinance shaiS not apply to any and all applications ,for shopping centers for which approval and issuance of building . permits " �- granted prior to the e effective date of this ordinance. t' V. 07flfiR MFNOR 14MEIMENT"S: This aiiendwent also proposes to modify, the use regu a ins or certain uses lete fraternal consistency among the planned communities, as xollgws: 1. Massdge parlors, -adult movie theaters and adult bookstores ww1d. he prohib ted within the planned communities, and 2. The foliox!ing uses would require" a CUP within neighborhood shopping centers. � o a Autonobiia servfce stations b. Canvenfen.e iarkits C. Fast-f000 restaurants d. 'Mine arrd ).iquor stores e. Restaurants ,'with'_entertainment and /or , serving of alco=holic beverages V- RECOMENDATIM. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ConaucT a pu 1'ic hearing, make any necessary modifications-to'the ordinance, and forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council. AReful ?tr led# -Z, er rr 8 BB :DG.*vc Attachments: Aesolutions Ordin6nces 1 G, rChL ors ht 90 K RESOLUTION OF,TOE RA tO► CUCAti4 W ftmNI�iC COWIssION RECO�INO APPROVAL OF VIeTM 0371E PLAN Itt9Et, f#I''�' Ole TO MODIFY THE ,C ITY",PLAN TEXT TO REQ UIRE "OWITiom usE PERMIT FOR SHOPFj%G CENTEPt:; A� CERTAIN U$ES IN THE C0190CIAL 49M7 WS SE&i` ON OF T r VICTO1wA Gtk MiTY PLAN of WHEREAS, on the 24th day of February, 1988,'-the Planning ommission held a duly advertised public he&Mnq= ptgn0ht 10 �3ect on 66853 of the California, 6oye► ent Code. StCTION I. The Rancho Cutaanga f ntiing.. OW3e icn' has miIde the ferira ing n n9s: 1. That the Ai4ndment will provide fog develwPoent of a r comprehensively PI&6 -ad urban cr �tity within, the � 4 � Oistrict that is superior to deseTopmeht otherwise allowable urAer alternate rtralatfons; and 2. That the"Amendeen't will �x)rpvi#e for t Within the District in a comer consistent wt the Aendral ;Plan and With relatjt dev #I sib and growth a anac ent licfes of . City; and � That .: he Aeendateeit will `'prov * ftr the const, ction, itpprovaoaettE,, or extension of tr'nspaVtation facilties, public utilitij.�s, And i pub'lic' services ,required by devaloNtit With the � District. SECTI9 The Rancho Mon� Planning Corm +4sism #a found that this pro ec wTTT7 tat create a significant adverse affect onvthe environment j and recommends to City CounciT the issuance of .a W04, %tive Decie�ati+rK on February 24, 1988. a I , THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED-. i I. ` That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65866 of the { California Sovernment Gads,. that ;Ae Planding { CcNWission of the City of Rancho Cecamonj& herft 1 recommends approval of 1Ffctoria Planhed COWWnity Amandmeftt 88-01. ?. The Planning Commission hereby recommend% tact the City Council' approve and adopt Victoria Planned Community Aretutment 88-Ul to modify the Cowes afty i Play per the attached OrAinance. E.1p41 ii 7�}�� jiO. ■�AT�np% y$ T, jiLn ��,b`TI/OR y Febraary 24, 19$it Page APPROV9� Aid AWEQ. TR "TH DAY OF FEBRU1AAY, �f1gdH. PI AMI#6 CO KISSION OF TM CITY OF RMM CUCAMKA t� 7 - �.arry4. ty it[tL4b'�`i�.�+�- .... -.w o G EST: - O But ter, D 1 ash ,• I, Brad Boller, a�2puty Secretary of We P1 amino 'Cowd ssifxr of the City of -hereby Rancho Cue4w"gr, certify ' that tine, forming Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passe4, and adopted by °t.he plaming ;Cowitsion of the City of Rancho Cucawi nga, at a regular meting of the Planning Cownission held on the 84th day February, the of 19M... by fol lmng rofi�- tt�art�t: AYES. Cowl SSIMRS., itOES. C"ISSIO ; ABSENT. CDWISSIONEA3; G - f RESt]�.UT�(0�►�NO. A IIESOt UTIOR OF THE RPACHO CUCAKRGA PtAKW NG CtkMUSSIC41 RECOINENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN MLVMENT 88-01, TO W)OIFY THE CM)NITY PLAN TEXT TO REQUIRE A CrMITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SWPPING CENTERS AW CEgTAIN UX4 IN ME CONNERCIAL STANDARDS SE4TI01 OF THE TERRA VISTK COMMITY P,AN Wl?BREAS, on the 24th day of February, 1938, the Planning Commission i held a My adveetised Public hearing pursuant to Section .65864 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1• anch'd /came, a Planning Commission has made the foliowing—MUM - f That then- Avendprent will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban corm li ty within the District that f� superior to devcicy*enZj otherwise !1 1 allowesbie tinder alternate *egulations; and ; 2. That the Amendment: will, provide for development Within the District in a alanner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth amanagement policies of the City. ai;d 3. Thdt the fimendeent will provide >fcyr the construction, improve"nt, or extinion of transportation faciltles, public utilities, and public services required by development with the District. SECTION 2s The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this Oro ec w not create a significant adverse effect plhe environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of:. a Negative`_aeclaratlon on February `'R4, 1988. 4 WN, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: v 1. That ^pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of he California Goverment Code, that the Planning 4x Commission 5f the City of Rancho., Cucamonga hereby recomends approval of Terr4 Vista Community FPa� Amendment 88-01. ,3 2. The "ann #ng Commission hereby retommends that the City Council approve and adopt Terra Vista Community , Plana Amendment 88»01 to modify the Community Plan per the attached Ordinante. jt a Pl.ANitINB COWIS61ON 'RESOUITION NO' T1h{PA 88-01 - kity of Ranasha Gucaeangr February 24, 1488 Pees 2 _ l06'VEa: AM ADOPTED THIS 24TH I.W OF FEBRvkgY, 1988. PLANNbNG COMINISSION OF 111E CITY OF PA N00 tJCMOWGA UYo Larry ATTEST: n � Via UU1 er, y B,, Bra "tiller, 'Paputy Secretary of. the planning.. $5 0" of the City of Rancho ahaatonga, dA heretsy CerL'y6t hat the fllrr b1n, itesolotion was dui and ar WT,rly intraduC�d: passed; atiRaptrct b y ;?'� Pli� ing t�o�aissi� of the Gity of Rancho Cucawgarga, at a lwting if Flannion the 24th day of Fetru�ary, 1588, ye the 4ollo+ring voate- to -Yaits C U AYES: COMMISSIONERS: WE 5. ` COMMISSIONERS: 1 ` ABSENT*, COMMISSIONERS; I r� s t ' ". O 17 �--� -- �- r-MY OF RANCHO CTJCAMOi3GA STAFF 1$Fk'ORT DATE: Februarp 24, 198tl 1; TO: Chairman, anj s„nmberr of the Planning Co�oissicn FROM: Brad Buller',!City PTann�r BY: Chris Wa4tman ,'AssistAt Planner SUBJECT: STREET MAW C14ANAP VM TrOD& vrarA GaDI1 iUzv run by A U > A propose! to- designate Teen a s a way es an Terra Vista Parkwry East and to design to Wes: Elm Avenue to a a4ior arterial and a collector 1$treet respectively within the Terra Vista Planned Communi i; I. ABSTRACT — request of Levis Homes, street name changes have' een -P-Mated for Terra Vista � arkway and Elm Avenue (see attached letter). Tif� street name changi:s are now before the Planning Ca- ruission for their review and consideration. The Planning Commission mast c6duct a publi' hearil',g and forward a recommetOa -lion to the City Council. , 11. BACKGROUND: As a° special; arterial, Terri-,`I Vista Parkway runs genera TTY east,and west as a loop read wi bin the Terra Vista Planned Community for approximately c oil es see Wihit "A "). A second special arterial, Church Street runs the entire length of the planned community from Haven Avenue westito Rochester Avenue." Terra `Vista Parkway intersects Church Street ih two locations. Elm Street, a ssalller cdllector loop road, al;o interiiects Church Street in two locations. The intentic>> is to lessen the confusion of the double intersections by renaming the streets withi the designations of "east" and "west ". III. ANALYSIS: By designating "east" and "west" sections of Terra yistn� Parkway-,- it will reduce the possibility o€ confusion due to the double intersections. - Staff has contacted several agencies and th6E general response has been that they are in favor 0 the street nape changes. A concern was LV ght up regarding L2e place�aent, of the designations of ''west" and "east ". Xt was felt that" often with directonal prefaces, they are not `referenced. If the designations follow' the:, alreadyt,,given street name versus preceding the given street name (e.g. Terra Vista Parkway West), it wlTl emphasize the designation, ` ITEWK 0 J 3 PMTCOk1lIS5ION STAFF REPORT � STREET N, a GliA'4E X88.01 February 24, 1968 Pxje 2, V.6ither street wi-11 have single family residential ,addresses. cwever,l+ at this time, thevi/�q�ar*,L\test thr*,*, apartment coprlaxes xith �Terra Y isle Pant. ;aay:.ddress a hool with a Terra Vista Parkt4y %street address. ? impaci be to those I r!will apartment dwellers. itpotential iwcts and issubs are outlined b0ow: Major Impacts. .� 1. There are tpproximately 50 residences Of the apartments which would be effected by— the name° chatage. Legal documents and ford of idehiification would have to include the "west" 40,iignatipn. Minor Impacts: the treet name signs w+ uld have to be ai,,k nded to i�aflect�� .. 2. Recorded pups would need, ame,%iment. _ ^; 3. Utility c ompanies, emergency services, and the postal service would have to revise their systems to t 11}7c6modate q name change. IV. FINDINGS: The proposed chards in accordwnce with �5ection S o rinance No. 144 and can be justified by the following findings: A. It is consistent with the goads, ° polici,96 � ' obJectives of the General plan. _. E. It is consistent with the adopted Circulation clement. C. It will not cause significant: adverse effect an the environment. D. It is deemed necessarjc' to pru tect the public hea%h. s4fety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. V. CORRESPONDENCE• This item has beep advA..'�Msed in The Daily � rt newspaper, es gnated areas were posted `�dong Terra Y si �a Pa'r ay and Church_ Avenue, and the apartment projects were posted at ktly areas! f Res, Ty S US 4 Bra r Ci4y � Attachwentsa ' Letter *r Le0S ji Exhibit W - Location Rap Ref5�l t ;i�c ' of Approval i3 cps - p ^ V ,l l r 0 i L o r . .'� +aG&.Gi .AAf�r iil�I'SfR' 4V± Paco � itT, PECK: �Qft. Staff mcommnds that c cue Plannin Cormmior - c coKW,: -77-p-MMic hearing and consider 4 441 the Uoects of t,hit < proposal. if Co ssian $boUl d Concur with gropo$&I� tz 1 1 Rosolution is attached for yottr cdnsideiatio'm. . .' 0 c .i RYA .rq.� � �� 81'1851; ik 9E6 C':.hNNINCi Ctu'BA:i � ,pg%1 1186Rcrxllou�wi�fa�Wk�PO. On 2a m chi-is WeE tma n� c.4 r Mr. Rlar:3h9 beparti, +non f' GxtY of Fta cho C�tCaman9a,_ - r ,5 p. sox a7 qt3�', j; ,�a.Wcho cuca""Onoa, Dear C,hrs we "taavig �xoticEd tha�ndeSIM .. Te a Vista. two Church fitrat't. in -hr :ins ®ur p�anr� for:. ;: that i5* ,have e. sec: %o �i rte= ViStia P`arkwa and Ct�ur�h' Ir two double' intQrser.tions, Avenue , tzr:i Guar, v A E'reet interts;= ..tiria Fire t3>strlt "way felt the matte=r with FQ� oniCity Staff., arttd "infest" will - ,. i�p have diSGUsed J`PCtionS „r)a5t ifi'S C�;:p�rt[net an 84,trr ?tl 5he�? �,ri�, Elm Street erases Faattt311 e the solutioxt I c 5 nl� Elm S.tre� where it starts a ' Churdh Street` \ i t twa's not wsprk in rocegds nort'.'a pas to th '\west gculevarC and; p t th r curves Aga" cor,fu: -1ncj to hQ. cur .e to the nortt^twe Mhat it would be Foothill" agreed by .tll .dart ei after erossxv V-011- ort,5 on "t lm street that I'm strer)t Ga the west o { tis<n driving - It Was Gu99e5tmd and retain the J� Ei,ulv-vard. a re -named West Elm 5tre€ t,s �ry glrude Avenui, G �1m street, r` $:t f$ Vista �) east of 5 „t -�_�Ce 4vt'nu -'as �'te t"a fl; ,�u o�e a d��'Yrrerit soluGinn for ill-,e to Church ``ata �e intersect. q f Mi 11' 'nn at) re-n' . 4 We would 13,0P t irit- a Parkw�sY and Chum west \ t of tia1111 ri that Te,'ra Vista %Par1kwi, rCidn �' Prooa5e �rkway µ�t� and that the Pa \` Terra t. is.ta F' 'P r"ay East, Term Vista a shcsv,tn9 out uroPaed t; pa_ re- nan5ed enclrised a map �,lltGlot' ti., le Fa' Your �nnvenienee. i 'Atia�ve our ideas ors + tii kn�tu what V a pctdurea the , stn_ Cna�gas. ?lease Aet us ,egilatiPns be acid &ti tta( there at "0 3ttiy 4i �r arr.. If there heeds Gu 1 'nail , to t2 C'' aware of, of, if for "t; ►ielch ?t. �c on1,r nee r Fesi free tri ti all 1 n. ?C•,a� �nrti, :Ai�IFCPMIFt r ucW IS tinMES O O g tai .ad�":ai'" -i` ,.../"°`°iaA'�i�"''►;.s et".�'"..s`iilUa�r�' i d l� f � I c; i W= PAN a � KMT R, CLJ IN111 TIT PLANNING DIVA EXHIBITI ._. .. LE- � 4a �s f v c r c r RESOLUTION WO. ;3 . A RESOLUTION OF THE RAiXHO CUCAM0*k?LANNING cOm1SSx" � RECM4ENQING APPROVAL OF STREET # CNA %E NO. 813-0] REQUESTING lr7t1M CHAME TO UESICN M TERRA VISTA PWRAY BEST AND TERRK MIST,&, PWWKf EAST, TO DESIGNATC MEs ELX AVENUE FOR A SPECIAL RRTERIAt A CfLL-ACTOR STREET RESPE:TIYELY WIT1411 TK TERRA -VISTA PLMNW C[>rNM1D#ITt' WNER Ss t+rt t}te 4th day of F'ebmiary, 1988, the Planning comission < held s duly advertised public hearing pursuant toil tion 65854 of the CalIforn'ia Gove+raeO* code; And !j WHEREAS, „fin the 20th day of �Mq, 1981, the ; j Council adopted Ordinance No. 444 establishing streyD Mw ng Policy ftr Ran��Cucan>iwpng4j and J u �, f 'UNEREAS, the Planning olv sign has prepared re .)rt discussing the r justification for the change„ ream WhOtiro a , replacegiint name and discussing the impact of the proposed dhar.ge NOW, THERIIiRE, the Planning COWSsiorn has lmde the fopowing ` findings: �o e, I, Tft . proposed change would not crea;;o ,sivafficant' adverse fmpdcts.on the t0fron rnt. 2. The prInposed change` • is consistent with trey goal S., Policies, and standards,oi` the General Plan„ 3. The prdoos4 change is consistent r> the adopted ctrtulation element. The street naft change io,, *emed oaCesi &ry in order to protect " <the Pub -U h0alth, Safety, cmfo.rt, conveni me, and general welfare; NDX, TMEF'ORE, 6Z IT RE OLVMI- ` �t Cil 1 pursuant' to Seotion 858x4. 85$55- of the California Covernment C, j the pl nrnting Gt issicln Of the City' of iRanchaC,-A 6jamongn hereby recd +ends .-approval on the 24th day of February, Yq88, of Street Name Change No. 88r01; � 2. That the Planning COOW;Ssion 144�,gby recongmer_ds -that, the City Council approve and {opt Street kame' Change No. 88-0%; and { ,S. That a tertif4ed --gopy of ;JiS iteso'€utiowan 'etlated y material hereb�+; of ty y the 'P_ nning Cd iSSion C� shall be '�arwarded to =;the, City Council,. `3 I , O PLA R COWI RESOLUTI61i NO. ITREEEI PAME,S CKAWE 88.0I ° Page 2 �! �� n � S VED AND .AMPTIM THIS 24TH DAY OF FEBRIJRRY, 1985. PLANNING Wi5SION OF T uITY OF RANCHO CCAI 7fi" 01, n. _ Larry T. mcmiet, as "—W .- ... —__. ATTEST: raf Mier. y ore ry I, B =ad 8urxair, Deputy Secretary of, .the planninS Coaeissigr� of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do h0eby, rertify t?, tine fpregaing Resolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adn4 by the .Planning Cowssivft of the City of "Rancho Cucaawnga, at a regular mmiting of the planning CoWs;ciar held on the 24th, day of F*bruaryy 1988, 6y the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COI!t3ISSIMERS; .'NOES: COWMI(WERS: ABSERT. � ' _ %VIMI ;SIDS: � C, a 't i1 �.1 4, .. - O. _ ftis TAFF REPORT F pg�y DATE: re4ruary 24, 1988 Mn TO: Chairman arid Members of the Planning Cow s�inn' �'FROM: Brad 84l7rr,, City planner BY: Scots Murphy, Associate Planner j SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION E6R. TENTATIVE TRACT 12332 - CRISTIAHO - A custom lat. ,xvsidentlal sub v s on - of-15 —%-t's' on approximately BS acres of land in the Very Low Residential f 01strict Mess than two dwelling units per acre), located r on the east s?de of Haven Avenue north of the NJ side Drainage Charnel APN 201- 121 -24. 1. BACKGROUND: On January 27, 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed Far egpes or a time extensiion for the above - referenced projeci.,. ng the meeting homeowners within the tract expresS:rl concern t three areas 0f the tentative tract designs t, I. Limited access to the tract; i 2. The width of the east -west collector streets, and 3. TW robed design of the street intersections, II. ANALYSIS: A. Accesii 1� The exist>i ✓g homeowners of the tract felt there was�in essence, onjy one point of access into the site. Because both street connections into the tract were off Haves G ; Avenue, the residents were concerned that if Haven Avenue was to be blocked, they would not be able to exit the t,lact and emergency ''vehicles would not obe able to le ve the residents, The residents felt that an access should be provided to the east, with, a bridge over the channel, to connect to the extension of Milliken Avenue. 1 B. Street Widths // The homeowners were also concerned about the width of the <t-ast -west streets that serve as collector streets for the tract. The Private streets xere originally approved with a Fi.11NNING COMMI"SIOWSTAFF REPOT � TIME EXTERSION FqR 'r A,?332 - C ISTl411 ti. February ?_4, 190 A 32 f'odct curb curb wi dth which only all c s parking on one side ipf the s et, The City Standard fdr pub`iic stree" Is 3E�t feat curd a purb Wh3chh A,) parking on both, sidg Of".1 0e :street, .�Ue � esi tents stt� id tisat };the pavement tvi t should inn# eased to the City tarcd:crd. rNeet C. Int0sectiOtt Desi_ > t The h&#ieowers sta that the assign of some of the intf.`rseeti M, particularly -the ` Whill sty*ets, did not • provfde adequate sight `distance visibility. €he downhill strqets had beep designed with 4 "hump" to prevent water fmit rdnning down the CuV de -sacx. With the roil in the n stri;et, visibility of oncoming t:-,t.j�j #c was difficult. The resY;dsnts 'pelt that a similar design should not be repeated within the remainder of tide :tract. _, 4-- ' iI_i. RECt1Ni :iBii�llflN: in order to dllOW the applicant land staff time to resiearc ese issues, tizi planning Commission caoginged this item for :four t4? weeks. On February, 12, JM, stafj,' receiYtcd ner, information from the a ppllct`��#�"but has not had ' sufficdlent me to ,I analyze the new terf4 7htWore, staff recomti:nds that this #em bN* continu#d for two (Z) additional weeks,,,, r yti Re lx $ t Br � t;ity;,Pl prier Atttachmen4;s; Exhibit "A" ` Let ew free satiated Engineers ' Exhibit "B" - Ler from Flooii CoAro . District Exhibit "C "'- Site;Utilizatian,pian Exhibit "0" - "Conceptual Gred 6q Flan Exhibit "E" • COWePtual Master plan T,. V' .Yn..1oM T�11rrrVV+�w1�•�' M1Yl1wiP.! - :IP.w�R4'l �- ....a..or . f� h r X10 ffi�C� <� `�iFiE s7 w SYN'�1iAit3. DKtli�tl�i �47i1�F " �: ��4�i 9i+� ��s COMM Isat • i, L4iLtk? �ALH1�: P.C1.�i1t6O+�fAtiYQ,Ir#1art�i't February li;, 988 " �`,� .- Mr. Brad Butler D irector of plennfng City of Ha *o a�-C)Iaavongo; 9340 ^C Easelin aload RaYtcho Cucamonga, C¢, 11730 RE: Tentative (Tact 1233 Extension:: i Planning oauRSisaian Coat me,' oce Sobwittal v, Dear Mr. Buller; � t Pursuant to our recent aeeting, regarding the, P�.annittg Commission '/�i CCnti� Snga of a consent calendar 'item for exteusion of leenr*ive Tract t 1332, Ut "hereby submit the following: 11I A. Four prints cC Tentative Tract Ho. 12332 revised to illustrate the` apprax j7ate lecstion. =of t pntas' of accessr Conditf6l of aplvovat' for Tr. Re 12332. solution�i S 85.23, Sectidn ?, Balnaerfng Item 3 ' requires an hccess Easement.. B. Four prints 6f,a masteV plan showing poteretiai development of th ad atcnt property to thet east osn td by ttie Bar: Earnay dzna County Flood, Ca xoi. District, 0 Prior to the develo itt of she oential: wcls' P� P plan, it moat be (;t determined if: - ✓ The Flood,Contrul District plant., to utilize the IPI\Loperty for its own _purpOett—ASee copy of letter from the Flood Control District l` detect 9 °22 ' rcluded herewith) 21 if the Flood Control District would offerthe property for 'salty; 3. If the ultimate ouster could obta =n : a Tentative Mao for e residential, development, hen?'the owner would :rave to eetermingix ifs a. He could obtain a+coas to Haven via Tract 12332 and Tract 17" ;124 via ar- joint. use of srvaaa (�ggreeotent, or; it i i )b. 1�fds in access to the east as south by development -f new '' and. bridge$. C.' your prints of the A.L.T.A. Survey play, married to °show the proposal location of an emergency Access to the c _t from Tentative Tract 12332 to Wilson Ave., via tho existiag h„ ,e and road''on Flood - v _ Control. District property. 'she e sement would, allay 'residents of xracti K 32932 and° 12932 -1, ,during as - emergency whist blocked the Rave; Ave exit, to drive zo the Wiest side of the channel, then north on the gravel *oad -to an exiitiag,pridge, then acroas' the bridge, tae" the channel east and ,south aloug� east iida of to Wilson Ave. The easement could 'also be used,,, by five au6 saiet7;;; personnel, to bring equipment to the tracts, We have been in cosrcs0n4ation with the Sap Heroardino County Flood Control. _. District, lot Angeles Department of wilier and Power and tba Southern' California Edison Company to, initiat$ tLo prone s of obtaining -the necsu`aary easements frors each agancyr In addition, we Bove requested :.a letter from each ageq� which indicates their position on this antter. At bas time, :rte have received can assurance t'.:ey will agree to the proposed -emergency access. lti ko C customary for each .agency t have a normal review period for this type of oasement of t j to four mon %s. -r' The Flood Contrs.`, District has i�formed us on easements such as we have , t requested, they'saill require the City of Rancho Mucsawnga to asauiae all liability which could arise from be use of thin road. b. Four prints of revised Site Utsl�ation Map, E. One print of. the Flood Contra ?: District Right of Way Hap "as information only for your 8ngineering Department, In response to Aarrys liausents request we offer the following Information: A. The reduced roadway widths specifically on Tackstem,Street, R.ingstem it Street, Calico Court and Bramble Court were approved by 'the c.Cmnission to transfer the normal area unloaded side parking gn „the to the landscaped area;, These streets should have been posted for no paxking'to accomplish this goal. If this has not been done, we are willing to ,assist the existing homeowners in poAting the existing., streets,. 1 t!. TW- seemingly exagerated humps at south running Cut - ode -Sacs was designed primarily as a drainage control to assure that tstarm flows _are directed where they are supposed to go. In steep areas runoff '�L-4 ti ti��UV� partigularly stheo mass: grading is not r *itlg propostd. ;G We undorscand prig gtenning CoMission's conch about sirfaty issues and trope that our respotaskx to your request, prove useful =i�satisfying Chose concerns. If y" have q46stfona pleesuDcall. r `- Sincercr Yr I \1 A3SOCI,1 E y lm- Villius ° E - Por; Cristitlio Parroara T §2 -66C c Cc Cristiana Partnert 1 Cl r 'Qr � j a , i U.. `? � z r rae 4,x nom• 24� A'1� .ee ; .+ fii'd 317�.,Y "".4" CV. C(�UIN�"rY JIR! is TRAN FLOOD OLI� , The, Cm s4sw cap 1100yy*ia 3b. tt B Attn :.,.PoWt S. 3WIC 4 r., �1 -am, U Dow z IM Mstriotf* inveatilp tUR iota ' 1�katt to V � iiWli to a revoided th�t' t is ctisVdl sed by t1w Dlstrtat "3 Cr** i►�. � re r ont'i7P W wx •tt+AsUo no 1�" "tiea as Dw�s' ��yy S �ditia"& +owl; i ady��M r,.__1 �(3�io salle..y� �} y��e f,�� it7.:et wr toud �i.s 1! as?�SF �^M'r!'° �A. ��Piyi.i �i� or, Jintim iA i7M► de ..� �, attt to now ilk 1�" 1� Vii. tlt�ti7� Q pleti the" gtoMy H9M t,# rstWtod Or pq besin v If 3CU h*Vo Soy qt?,eeti:=, Duel `:. aontxat JWG Villi,W& At 107141 38i =2736. VW7 truly 1o" ex Y, 1�rsn A. l Yas-r# Dp3�„sa�iar.��ir�r jA.•yet,.. iiV � L`�V{I€ wd YN6l 0& 0 &V /lr ` <1 o n e l a r e u 4 iL 44- cu TiM.F. s. -ku -6 ,4r_ Jill r _ �_.,� -. ;_t � � � "� Y! y. ,' 2 rY X29 e• � x lip � IVA, IOA 3xt fit LI t w � <' e CITY 1 GA PxLA.'N.'4I,' IIAxXHIE3? -- SOLE y RANCHO n �+•�►. 1i. a TIT' € wel _Q �.+ FMA$'i ftA," show" G y. +a? ltitTlttS hlTttt OtTilMV;1iC4 N'TNt /11M'1l tOtTi11E :titT 4FMt t1NT ��R71ttYpi TtRtT Mt. itttt RANCHO n �+•�►. 1i. a TIT' € wel _Q r io ORT kid DATE: Feorua,'y 24, I,rtV3 t " TO., Ghairiw and temr {of th8'1,Plann1n4 Commission FROM: Drak��tul'ierr_City Pj.rnor - `' Chris Wos'twft tsi stant Planner.. h SUBJECT-. E![1{IRONM€NT 1. ASSESS14ENT ; l !a�CPWRT RENEW 87.5"' nnas.., _ s ri on u dial" tote iFig 23, A2,7, sc�sre feet --on 22 ayres of and do the General 3cdustrflav Uistrit f$t(area :. 13). 'loxat d at the ' sol the st -, corner, of 6tb' Street and Desffalavenur� :aW 2 2ti3.1t3 tnrnugh I3. ' I, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRI� ON* A. A tion _Requested: Ap�rovai of Sfte Plan and elevations, ' and tiif1- 97,van "�c� a Neg(4ive,Declaratidn'.. ---Z, a r;,zunding, Land Use and} 2onfn. ene ��tr3;al truth Vacant; ezleral I %stria', East Vacant; lenerai Wit, YaFnntenaral snds5trial f, C-1, Grner49 P340 Del nations: r r -da earTMe - On era nc'{GStri�a"I North - General Industria3 r ^ South - General Industrial _a East a Gener :,,.sue..` do letuaj�42'Yal We Et ,� neral� Industrial D« Site Cmracterrstfcs.- the side consist$ of three parley' which it are c4 ^ran y ac,��st- without any signiticmrt getation. 1 Existing v.trf-)ts,)run b0, the west, Ruffalo Avenue, and a portion u of Etit Streei and on ,tea emit_' (Old Rochest0, - Avenue3 .1'd'l arty ; 1 ` bouodsr�ies. A new street is, i �^r posed alc'� „the s th��Srop?rty <: boundary. S' e t Nmp: eee?es�ts4 -� „e been" comp etQd ,ll�rg Duffal i Avsnuf` . Pt 404eways. �FtZ; ester Avenue h"a,° rdt been fully cemgih ed «' Tfie :property' has. a fti i3t grade "frorA, the' ti north 'Cl Sisut 4, 1 fj DR 07-53 - O'DONWELL! ,7MA$ February 24, 19,%, 1 Page 2 - F. Parking cticuiaticA-. st 1. y Nuwber of Nw*er `6 � Type Square Parking Spies of Use "eali otage Rrztid R WarehoLS,�e 255m275 * � :' f iKanufa`;1 {tY'iog. If500 3?�,�•_ .-.,_ r . Teti 42,792 48 ~ 20,000 sq? q 111 '�re. feet tmQJ" f eD,ADA - 40,000 square feet - V 000 ` 40,000 sgvare fget fwd up :j4J00 r; �. �t Ii, MALYS1 S. A. aerera : The functiore'bf Subarti, 1311s to provide liffidusfrTaT,,- evelopment for thtsO-bustrt&5sei which have busifrss - Ctivities assoc tad wi 'll Subarea . Z the uses all-# # `r vri�aar'tly light `and, media inufactt r;n The It as p"opased is . consist6nt - with hese Tan 1 use a, 5 c' The ' _ Tsc6 iicatj arr l eaift Cmaittees have �r the .r , pro�ct a "dr�e��ded 4�ecifii`nnd3tia�s of app j4_11 _ t3.. Deli nn Review �t` ,rttce: TW6 OwiiVme' (Chi- B. McNi :17, L'a emn7 rs' Iewe'e ae pra ect fn ;anuary 21, 1958, � and made tho fotipwit; reCOMenditicds for corditifons of appr#a7: 1 *e` 'screen wall J,'rAh runs b, tween auildings 1811 sh6lErQ; 1'a 0 � i=*u r "A,6,r"ete Nhich ;Vetch tue x color ss` a t��ds" of the ;, prct buildings. . Tfte deeta {`i designof, areas should ha„ st+famitteri #er City P1,`�� A: rAvip+� „� i as�c' prav�tT prior to building ` er4,;fi; iysuanca. 1 ;3: Scion. [nd4ra,�e treatmart'* aspproved by-the GiCv:. Pla .ner _ shO'Oc. !Ye provid�id at the ini6rze tf�r e ' 4. aQor rurityWall proposed'an trd } j nor . ,o�aid be suh4�ected to De =ign Review\ ,� + and approval pr ; -p cronsixt rat iextu s er ing, repproVed gay sic City^ P¢aMTdr, , J s� a ld id throughout the pre rt. JncirAr�in .. intro Frrz . cular ,,n ress grid eares� �, ,.•� Yk�e wteHal for. �hr' textfc d'pad�ent sh�ulct-�tN; ct rpa ib3e_ tc th .6,- chitecturai s'tyl� and shbs ,# hoe nt4ftl color .for richhess. 1: r :1 / � x['11• RE wssm PORT RGbruary 24, - Page a C Enviromentai Asse6m; to Parts I and II o €< the 1"Ittai Studoy� i Fave` 'coee► •e an no s sofi`icant im 3ct have: beds f sad l !` - "retated ttkibe � onstru:t�ioo d this :proj'ect ;*:. FACTS ` FT IN$S. ,i The .Prop sed .-ime is corsispeot �dt;� the, a Hera, . in h i d�stria: Speclift Plan. ,,The bUildinq esign t ' and Site Plan: together with Cite re3ommfioed co�s-Aioos, of approval , artr)n crptce.rrithe I str4"`,;Sp;1fic Ptah bpd ai t other a�p� icabl a C�i ty sia�ar s. ( , r �, �m e � J M, RkOd -4 NDATI'&: fitaff mom*Ads thai Y �+�e PIanning GE fission approxe event Rtvisw 87.53 thra�3rrr �,�iogitdn a tha attch# f Res�oi.ut;on (if Approval with coaditi?��#s ;. am � e a Negative DectarOifon. ' Res annet,1 BB:CW:to Attact!Tents: 8,�� PO "A' 'Lora /ion Map V tbi't - � . Ex�itibit "0" nc� cdpn Pi an Q' ; c"1 Ile iotution of Approvalt With StapdarA Conditions y ) +�wp[ttVa •arrosrxa pMa +QY '�,r � .... .... r.w.. i w , � � •• ••• • IDtlhaR ;A tif1G[ y ti k J Mae tj io U � RESOLUTIOk -NO. A RESOOT ON OF THE RANCH ,, CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO*IS�JON ° APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW HO. S? -ft? LOCAT€1m = AT, Tt,E SOUTHEAST' CO{awcgW }.tR OF�y 6TH gSTREET ISO BUFc�t10 'A� "�NUE I# THE GENERAL itd?UPRIAL D1`aSTRICT, SUBAREA 13 OF THE INDUSTRIAL 'SPECIFIC FLAN APN 229- 263 -10 THROWS 13,, ai5 Y? A. Recital S. O'Donnell,IOltman has filed an application for the approval of ff .i` Development Review No. 87-53 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub4,t;ct'Development Review recriest is ,r refereed to as "the application ".. ° r (ii) On the of 24toi of February, 1988, the Plaoning(lowissiot of C the City of R,,&ncho Cucamonga conduzzel a meeti ,19 on the application and € concluded said meeting on that date. IU / f (III) All legal prereg`i sites f to the adoption of tbis tesbl uti o' h have occurred. B. F 11ol ut4 on. HOW, THEREFORE, it is herebli found„ determined and, resotved by the Planning Commission of the City.of Rancho Cucamonga as fellows. 1. This Cissittn Cierety ,spe+:ifidall, finds that all of thefts set fototh in the Recitals, Pars A,. of this Resolution are true and correct. �, 21 :`used upon substantial evidence presented to during the above- referenced meriting oO February 01, 1988, 14 iuding writit-11 and oral $ 'Ff reports, this CotigtAS!Jtt b&eb spa6fieally fltids as folly s; tai,. The application applies to property located the southeast corner of -Fth and Ouffalk and } (b) 1i.e property is cant and Is slit4�le,`:for industftal i N development. - Based upon the subs kaatial eiide��e presen rl t; thi: G aiSOok { during the above - referenced metl;ting and (1pon -the specific fiAdings of facts. set forth in naragraph,`l and 2 above, this Cana,xAsion hereby,;fin4 and concluded as 611ows; ' (a) raT theme- proposed , project � is consiste it ��, th� %r the obj*ctives o the.,Seneral PEan and,'!o fbi That proposr*d use is In accrd with,th i? a 4", of the uvelcpment Coe and .the A „ r as a triF the district itti iyhich• ]Se site is �? pU p e:r ',ate and PLANNING OWISSiON PESOLUTIOW No,., 1 aft 81 -53 - O'DONNELV',O!.'{i AN February,,24, 1988 Pa" 2 - '1 icy -That- the 'i roposed, use is in compliance with � each of the applicable provisions of the Oevelont Code.; and id2 ,this`' the proposed "414, to gi:6er with the con; pns loplicalble thereto, will not be detHmental to th public health, safety, or, WeMi re, or mater# ly rduriouc rc operties e+° im,°trovents in ti a vi�'t 11 4 This Commission hereby finds and �if _ that'the pro,ec� has been rev.e`eed 4nd ccrsi '; �r� n c pT i nee with to " li. arnia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 ",and, I�t fitf, this Cowissiori hereby Usuvs a Magative DecUration , 5. Basao. -.Upon t4 findligs and c0ftiusiuns sot forth in paragraph , 2 and 3 `asoae,, -this Commission hereby approves the appl" cation subject, gb each and every:, conditior, set forth felow and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by-this reference. Flanni�j divisiur , if ' (1� The screen wall which runs between Buildings � and E- -should be tilt -up concrete which match the color schemes and textures of the project buildings.' 42) The detailed designs of t'he plaza areasc ).should be ' submitOd for city - Planner review and appvoval prior, to buil`,Airig�oermft issuance, (3) Sreciai laradseppe treatment as approved by the city Ptannet, stibu be provided at the intersection of ,;�' Oth and Buffalo. t� (4) K�sy futuire screen or secuwity'wait proposed-on the (, nert'I property , }1 ine should be sabyected to Design ` 1 Rev* COWIttee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits,, n X51 A c- -insistent textured paving, approved by the -City E1;166er, should be" u�od throughout tie project including points io,' vei_,icular ingress end nress, The .mais,0,al for #,he textured pavement should be caapatible' to the architectural style aid; shoulr ;\ stave integr#1 color. for richness. .� 7 Enneeting II }" tA 'Street shall rte' contstructed furl -wid'th except o that, eff -site sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred Until- deve?opArertt of jthe adfa:rint property. f ,r nM. rt PLMkINa COWISSxQhf R E./.�} �yV ;{J� 24, 1986 {February ixty rtmauentad Assessment Parts r and 11 of �t he Inj ial h and n$ si ificar� been'fattnd relatted to the`�:� `_ °str�action of #frs prat. t; ,� a tfeput Secretary t! ih aran Shr} cer #ffy #+h adi ion of 0w; Resolution. 1. LIJ - o` APPROM AM AD6Px,1O „TffIs'g4Tfi DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1988. PLARNINS COWIS5ION OF TW C TY AMCW CifCA #fCA $Y; CAML� ffi a er, e � -X to Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of ibe Flaming C Ctr ' e of, Rangcho Cucamonga, d hereby ;ertify that'#ne foregoing ,esaltrti.an x x duly and re. Mari introduced, passed, �Ad adoptod by-, the Pla :n:ing Ctxmission of the City of Ranchd Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of thi, -011 t Ct�am3ssicrn held on the 24th day of February, ,1888, by the folTo$ging 6te ta,,,# t: . AYES: CtiDi?3SSICk'+ifai8s �,;,i� 47VCS: 'YY'H71.Tii - AOSEKT: ' C"ISSIONERS. �l ID i r. J If r App it IS In1 i.t3.. :y =fir k Ill If a Pho st 0 Hill stilt SN f.A 11w�e yV $s ,fir 'ryM�� rY��S l x- t.yyS x2 t _ �M 76 i l w p� hrx lsw�as 1 41 O 7r C Z k r3 s3 yf �. IL Ownty 0 a f— y L.i Pytf _ Y41 wY YY y fjRR' r�i, 1 ji M N� �i ry 3f' Qs.1��_.p •gip, a� ^ �. /� 1 ii �M L � Y is .. 111 g -4-01 lilt 7-51 4113 wo Q Orr Y N N i a—Zv a*, Rp its, A r • iy w k !all al N if--val M is JIV OL OL sw »` M •4r NT �.�, iP � �� Qe 1�� ■ a+ i; h « ak� 2 VT fry 41 i W� �v Jute 1 jj A y 11 SL I In �x ,i W L� «a o,t o ti � / l r poik Ail Mi IT r zta M� i+- �yy `` R 7, T as ant All X11 } l �iFFii P J •i �i@t f^q�"r �� a` s �p 01 M. St a� is r i 3yi 41 IT .« 4 i rr 1� it as • E 1� rC a ail ip w_ 'jJ 4.. ,A Fi f u a ;..=.. $ayTe�; tit all I _ all ju .a w KY�w V b Mai in H 1 � rr yy e'ItA'' w ii. =-s z .v *.Y4� Wit li' f VVM ii •� VGl 1d 4^ y� ;;pas �y r s fit _ 9 gig {� ts �rw 6 � i a M s }L ,pay is u tl. #�i Ma!ia L � J_ryjj k �.Y c� .SOT $1 MOT ox 41 s r.j i y H -F Fir lisp " f �i��# f a I I 41 rrraaarrr �. St � x� I _ all ju .a w KY�w V b Mai in H 1 � rr yy e'ItA'' w ii. =-s z .v *.Y4� Wit li' f VVM ii •� VGl 1d 4^ y� ;;pas �y r s fit _ 9 gig {� ts �rw 6 � i a M s }L ,pay is u tl. #�i Ma!ia L � J_ryjj k �.Y c� 0701 -02 �, 2 -24 -88 PC Agenda 3-of 4 F ! g � v wtie y S ICA IL b � O : � Z. wic 2 fir's dE _ . Y M �� -( tea. �• �� w r 3� F �� C� r:P•14 L.w s a s .3! 511 �d _521 Sena SN 1 Im T i v : +` I ;S I's t Y a4 at, y+s b Y i L i Ut Ri 4 AFB aC� AM 4+ IL 1� -1V KA poor Qww tl � # $""° >: its �ip 3 gag es 1-711M Its Kr g� xi� r+. • W pia. '�`. �r _s ev .�, ^ ffi \ t Y St r O L 0. Y Y :_ L �0 y` As gig 8s zj4 4— N V.�ae�PL }', a °� Se r�tg$ •C 1. u Ms E XA ^ g �P15 :,�; a s Z f J, �yk�;�M i av PiNe7 p y /p yr~.r a LO WU 1fm! r ,l w tt �.�e Nil Ms E XA ^ g �P15 :,�; a s Z f J, �yk�;�M i av PiNe7 p y /p yr~.r a LO WU 1fm! `+ 51 N yap ya yy y if a 3 r W Y 4y»„ jj 214, Y S yfa �4, 1.LA �t�.',, M Y} � aw K—i7e <; `0Ig K7► IBS M i V. tix p' CvK M- "FrSRt7 !!"r, e•`r nV� Y 31 NM+ Y,O i tom. V Q � '., 3 oa v � mit dk `+ 51 N yap ya yy y if a 3 r W Y 4y»„ jj 214, Y S yfa �4, 1.LA �t�.',, M Y} � aw K—i7e <; `0Ig K7► IBS M e•`r nV� Y 31 NM+ Y,O v � mit tl a 1v a:> e Kai .5 Y s- j �O.J ^g� t -Y MJI Y � aL4w ' N �Yrw� A p 4' Ilj4l� !4 !!yyi!pnn a �2 Opp44�� V.e. yY,�l. NM..e I Crry OF W40110 "UCANIONGA OATt. February 74, 110% 1937 y TG: ,`�Chairman'and Membsrs,,af r:ne Planning C0!!1aissi {', FRON: Brad Odllar, City Planner BY Chris iestman, Assistant Planrrer SUBJECT: APPEAL \11= TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88'-03'-' 03 • PRATHER:= An appeal oUT -staaf"i s ec sion o env ;;� remox" a of three (3) _1 gucalyptui ; trees "at the rear %',; a ;single family home within this Very Low'Residential District (E -4 dwelling units per acre) 1 oosted At 9200 Golden .� 'l4PN 1136"x- 221 -Cs9, I. BACKGROUND: An application for a Tre� Removal Permit was submitted ,Y m rasher on January 12, 1588 r �;esting permission to remove three Eucalyptus trees. A site inspdctiop was conducted and staff determined the trees to appear healthy, that the trees did not pose an immediate threat to any properties, ut4 ?ties, or persons, that 2 there was not any confli�:'t with pp`,,6 -q imprgvements, and that the trees are part of a' broken windrpw, there;,,y determining }that -the trees should not be removed. : However, it was recommended in a letter dated F0ruary I, 1958 that ` an option for reducing the risk of any tree branches causing feature, I damage would be through proper prAng practices (see Exhibit 11W). r . j II. ANALYSIS: in the past two years, the City has taken a considerably s' gong °ec^ stand on�tree preservation wit hin the ca nny. , Many i darae3 Tree Removal Permits have been appealed to :Mr. Planning Commission and several ' have' sWsequ�ently� been appealiM to the City Counr it , A recent - appeal to . the Cii;yv: Council wat upheld _which allowed a private property owner to remo -jP eleven Eucalyptuus. trees without the requirerent of replanting. The 4iscussidh of the City Coundi was that the policy of requiring' -teee preservation ort private property should be examined because of the financial burden upon the homeowner to maintain the tees. However, each case scenario is unique _, This request is "far the removal of three trees which are loca`�,a_)ithin an Equestrian Trail: eaceme,%t behind a six foot masonry block wall of tt(e rear of a 167 foot deep -lot, The Justi.rication for the tree remoil is stated as r a hazard to a new single family horse. There' does not appear to be the immediate pct ntial for hagitrd andlor property daisage. Tiierefore, staff fe.0,,� drat the -,lain is speculative and denied the application bated on. the request's inconsistencies with the ;Tree �reservatio�: Ordinance (see.;�xhibtt i'8 "}, `�,, ITEM N ..- .. -T i\ . STAFalryC_ f bLAN"r a CC1;\AMI SSY, Oat + X.M- TREE RENDYAL PERMIT 843 . PR14Tt R �i February 24, 1988 Page 2 IT In an eff)rt to comproOise, thy, >applisa�rt hay offered i rep ace.' 4 " the. ±? trees, sha�zici �+ey b a�3aweQ;,a be remoued,-with six 18- gatTOn trees of a sirailar specibs 11.4- 01yptur maculsta: or, silwilar), 1J II1. _R ION: Stkff has denied the tree- re"Val' aprAlcation ` Hasa on a strict interpretatie+q of the Try lessrvation ' rJrdinonce. It i &,, recomehded that the si)anning Co"I55ian review � ti►it; appeal ;and provide staff ,end tn��epplicont vith appropriate direction, J J. Res fully s bmi is 1 ,r City .P aptter Attachments Exhibi7, A ��. " . Tree �emaval Permit App7..,ptiarrt. J Exhibit "B" - Trek PresErya #ieh Ordi:tair RwwaT Exi',ihit "C" Si .e Plan Exhibit '4D' -'Utter of AWaT Exhi6t,'E : Lfttpr Dated ;Ianuary 31, 198 E�Rib3i 7 "' City- Appwora'! .uettV Hated Mar h E9, 14a4 1 Exhibit LC, „'t�dtt+�r t d ; ebrnur,Y � i, � 1988 1 '1 f +J � ,I 01 t ' F 0 f Tree Remov#1 Permit 0 GENERAL INFCV, T?iON LEN n1AN 5 TKRES OR 501 LPiEAR FeErOL -<9L WROWi' Ordinance Flo. 275, ,aert'aining to this presarvation~.it treat on private pragerty, requires th xt i,erton remove or relocate any woody plants 3h excess` of fifteen (15) feet in height 1p;d having, �*11 gle trunk circumference of fiftrren (15) inches or more and multi•trunka having a circiimferenii 6f thirty (30) incites or more (measufid twenty -four A24) inches frgm ground level), without first obtaining a Free 44 Removal Permit from file City. z Tip BE COMPLO`iEp 1Y PLtCAW: LOCATION OFISUBJEC- TSITE: r,ri��y. 0. NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OFAPPLICANT: ice' - °�'��°� --�9 / ✓i'..:F' �wwlrt>'f9� ,�, '��'� � ��y NAME. AD1'7RESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNIER (it otherthan applicant), r•,. REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary Meats): r }� PR0POSEDMETHODOFRti4 L: 'df CtFPL(CANT'SSIGNATURE' E `/•+¢� i (ADDITIONAL FILING >R berm .r This r pplication shall ineluds a plot plan indicating location oP a' i trees to be removed and retained. L. The species, number. and size of the trees to ba removed small bo)o desigrated. if a tree is diseased, then a written statement from a licensed arborist stating the nal'�re of the disease shall be required. ACTION —r ExNna orr of this apgtSoaWa is hasira on the f+erfiia',att tho rover a s►ki& C D APPROVER DENIED k By'. � Date: r The permit shall be valid for a period of ninety (W) days, untess an extension is requested fourteen Et a) z. ") ; days prior to the expiration of the permit. v+ NEW hjd I , Condition of the trees? 2 . Any Safety hazards to persons, adjacent Property or utility installations? ar 3 . Any conflict with proposed Improvements? ., 4 , �Proximity of other trees in the area? .� 5. Effe ^t of tree removal on the Rssthe1tfC3 of the aisa and the public health, Safety and welfare, 6. Are any of the trees required to be preserve by any Specific plan, condition of approval, or histc:,;C landmark designation?_ _ . r: l . Is an a rborist required? . ;1 �._ -- i ?s`� :" €= �f J t) cny 4F jw4ex ,GUCAMONGA Pon MAN &M W71 Clcuemxp, CAbMia 917VQ 4714) IM185 t l; January 19, :908 Jim Prather 64220 Klusman Rancho Cucmcanga, California 91703 VP SUBJECT: TREE REWYAL PERMIT W03 Dear Mr. Prather: The etlanning (iivision Pjas reviewed you? regu"t to remove S Eucsiyptus ?�; eag using tft� dwtter a astabltshed by the Trayt "servation Ordinancs, me. 276. saw "pap this review, the f 'lIowin� findings have beep grade: 1. r The trees are In a healthy condition ane do not appear to be diseased or in danger o collapse. 2. The t trees are located Wjthtn a pmivfii* equestrian `trail I east+aant which is separated five tht rest of the pM, -4rty by a � masonry wall,; Therefore, the areas are riot in proximity to the house, nor do they interf9re with , existi►tg or proposed i�provmaents.; Therefore, your removal request has been denied. There is a tan (10) day period beginning with ,the datt of t%is letter in which an appeal rAy f be filed with the planning.Commission Swreiary $ ld a so choose. The appeal must` -be in writing and accgtWnied by a $62.00 fii�2ng fee. Should you have any questians r rdin� this application, pleasg conta� Chris Westman of this office at 14) 1861. Sincerely, C Y BEVEL €P/6R t?ii" ING, EVIS " Dan Coleman Senior Planner - DC.te - I a Vow L9ebor N: H:AwA-' #ettrey King CIO V.++.t+, t De,nisL Surat CNUies# ugtlatr[ Pwula #.iYniht f,w"U W -..—.. i '.i8i:tta4l ��i�tj.�1'�(i � PSECI>xYf i�101�dum . YNr:E R=Y ' h a is rs4mt a�ua0i.r4t++iGi ! (; a ,m oml tar dswid,mcY YO n `• Arc .wcw slwac s teen , er 50 ie�esr east tP wisr(e+�ry pe3n� r�jt . 3 I a Nelsr b s.�DiiNk! � ,At1h! ,�S 1 ►1r4'MiE ps'aecss 1w SaN;Yise .. Maeien,e tx ! .1t.Qs:'C�t Sre34er 1l.eK.07gR �. k . i G A. private vi►ge • � a�tt" to.. a Tree k sad Permit is aw iirHwsr is tt a� w 74 2fic Mowing OWN.1w, is ber" extabujohW4 . �>a rMoOkA of tha N m, the city plamw psi a, hers atee dt* and . the rucP?r a on *"Of "a 1 a. This Cmat%► of the bVew with rcpt to �. � of anorMY�atfttr 4 5tltyto4" at {aURV, at �iwwe ms with Ut u mwwfear b. Ttw weenitg to tegwft a tree i4 Mder to �irct �m4wb[ Which a39 W ieoixan�ae a ftjt sm-t at table e. '!'be twteabpr o trees ast5tar4 to tile ,r**htfcc `"d .! Offect tha ramaw would f arse an tha estabUsied meter of tho Oft ad the prop" zt< telhather ar t1aL tt rbee rreger 1 tp eresm't►ec3 by $AY s�eioitic ptsn, eammuwty i f 0"ti 'oi►at, or deaigi>iated as at histarttt 1�dsaark. JUVB PRATIWS LANt SCALPI F,I a, INC. "20 KLUSMAN $1: ALTALOmA, CA lr.0 (714) "O -2S100 STATE !� WCEN$E 4491 16 City of Rancho Cucamcngffi o Conaunity Developnent Dept n • *, .rYa Chris iveatman, Planning Division 4320 Baseline Rd. Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, Co- 91730 Subdc -zt; Trte Removal Parmvt 88-W Dear Mr. Westman Regarding the request we had ti iireftve the tretw at our gtOperty at 9200 Golden Alta Loma* we re+:ieved a denial in the mail 7ester34, Fen. 2 fsow-xr. Dan Coleman. Wu harebq are appealing this ®arser Ond are enclos:69 our c ack for $62.00. Alao %wu are enclosing all prjpv3o,,4 �a esgiosadwnce "'With i�ur ag In x rence to the- letter asp recieeed 1+c tericAy from Sii'. CoTeman, he vot?,oned M Cit7`COunci,2 Meeting In Burch - .or_ce1*nins` the Tree l*reservsption^ ord :nand k� -'We w0ulw like to he noti ked of this meeting so that,We can at•tenaC. t Please advise on this uppx"al 4 the proceed3nga f:am ast„ we are agars at `oa this Matter, Tiank You for ;dour cooperation Sincerely, ,Tim Prather, j Pres G• it n � U. j To Whoa Xt May Concern, I submit this report as "URCM". Tl,,,.!-s co�4cqyAh, the E-,acala, *p #us trees located on our property at 92W mxbls 1tm. t t A Lot 11 Tract Na«' Rx. cel .No. 062- 221 -0�9 w.hii h havg? caused eater eve damage in the five' tai y@8 Ti o.J; o'Onership. / \ Several months aft"ving in the 1l fiat Tiamuge gcc ed' Za%ge -tree limbs 'stoke oft and damaged ouw Moe% waft. I iptaediately azllect this Citg�ef. Ranch,3 Cu=monga to report the <«amage. T1l city informed us the builder *ns respoz Bible and to cones him, -=Ch' we c3° dN %The builder told us the city could na J let him teach the trees. IieGeiv+ jaa /satlSZ,%atian from either pa?;ty, we nixed a tree tvismar, at our expens tog mad txus the trees. The following ye l y "tip oaa, "�; -eted the lards aping in our blWVarci, which tucluded a pool. Dur � s �.va ;rear period; 4e 'have hact peri!adical 12-ob- hems w:,th the trees : 'Dverirg our � I wit limbs and�Aiebrls, even though 4e spent stoney keeping 'mil a trees trimmed. past 3*ear(19$3) we contacted a tree,,ixim el` to top and; trim the Eucalyjitifls trees before th*a *iu£is started. The „entlei aM reported. back U us the city refused`us the right to top the tree*, he aa� d only trim them. The ixE;es again caused dasaage to our home,podln yap This -last wind stare (1984) has been the wojrst disaster. The C break3 .bg 1islos dest^oyed cvxblock wa�1 again, caused *e to our house and patio xoo."s,,, tore ofT our rain gutters ani nearly cage lthrough c= windo•r end glass patio dooW. our pool has to be We- plastered due Io stains caused "a the debr�\ _ f r At this point, we can not see where theso tj'Pees axe sertr. ng any ecological. purpose. It, has bscoze niothing but a dize.;tl7,inaa2cia,I burden to us, as hoxmeownera. � I Our requc_ U for an immediate xt.PTY would be,' gxeatly apprec i &! @ i, as the rebuilding of our block ox 21 (to conta3,g,au u s) and yoxd repa�4.rs axe cantingent upon yorz kppvAral« 1r•� r/ sin erely `lot= C) 0 _Q (�(jj CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. FK _. - 'p � ,,; �lpnr.Ttr�t ii. 21�Clit c• . 3d . you t� i s Reh a Y P, tiBip A; S e rq W77 March 29, 1984 i Mr. & Mrs. ,lack Robs o 9272 Golden Street Rancho Cucamonga, California 11701 Dear Mr. & Mrs,. Robb: The Planning Division has reviewed your application for the removal of five Eucalyptus trees Bridle Trail at the rear of your property. Field inspe..,mion Ki revealod the hazard the trees present to your ham. Therefore, the removal of these trees 19as: been approved. This is Subject to the condition that an equal number of Eucalyptus Maculata be planted to, replace the removed trees. { ;G- The replacement, trees must be installoa within ten (10) days after remove -..; If you have questions please, ontzct this office. Sincerely, i COMt3UNITY DEVELOP itNT DEPARTMENT PLANNI C DIV'ISIOtt Ap ohn R. Meyer r Planning Intern JRMCdas 4. o /Vf , � - 9420I AS LI.iwt: RoAP,S61TE c • pos'r OFFICE BOX $07 RAMIE CLCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA K"4 * (714, .aS•:. r. ["5t 44 'ANCHO CLLCAMONOA rmom"eee007 RU04 CKAWARM f:AUWWeS17^trr4)989-1152 c; February I, IJ88 Jim Prather 6420 Rlusaan R�1.00 Cuc ga, California 91701 UBJECT: THE REMOM PWgT 30103 rwar Mr. Prather: TNe Tree Preservation Ordlnarwe was adapted to implemiiA the goals and oE► actives of the City's 6er,eral Plan Which encourages the preservation of the Eucalyptus Cndrows ils '�An IMP3rUnt 114"t of the history- and character of the community., Xt the direction of the City Council,, the F Planning Division has scha�dnlsd a MOW of the Tree- Preservation Ordinance in our work prbgreae, It it tAticipat ed that a report on, tree om ,l preservation will be taken. to the City council setime in march. The report will discuss the i"act of than recent Eucalyptus barer beetle k i0estation and the issue of l.ree prese�mvation on ,Private proper `; y4p may be aware, the Eucalyptus windrows ware originally planted as windbreaks to prott�c�' orj.,tar* and vineyards frm the seasonal high ° winds common to this area. It IS enti'2vly possible that the removal of these trees could have resulted in greater dameg,^,. Proper pftning Practices can miniwize the'1Y�anch drop and litter associated with $he,:' glue Gus Eucalyptus tree (sea atuacW guidelines). Regarding the denial of YOU-, for a Tree Raswval Permt", the decision is final unless appealed in timely fashloh as stated `Ju cur previous letter. 7rely 01WITY EWLO OEPARWIIT PY MING YIAI O r l,rma "`e► - SeiRor Planner Jcct� 'Chris Weston I F G �. .te.et;:wiaFerf c �y srxr.• ikfx rth !V flrnwn Jeffrey K! "S . Oen�t +lf Sssws osete*l &oquoia PamritJ 4Vnyht Jaurrn4t Kaurfthan GENERAL SPECiIIICATIONS FOR Pr`cn`NING TREES Alden Kelley, Arborist The primary aim of pruning is to preser-vz "- health. beauty and longevity of tree::. pruning ; , this WPM will also make trees safer more functlotmi aad valuable. Practice-- such as stub cuts. ri.,�d+om, branch removal and topping (stubbing back the entire crownl defeat_*,e primary afro, create hazards. ; and drastically reduce the monetary vrlue of trees. 'therefore. such practices mush' not be employebl;£' The following 913'Odfications identify prf. ,no: g ari�ethods which will give maximum beoefits to �.th trees k; and people. 1. 'types of cuts I A. Removal of laterals Itouldai- cuts. The fine) r:uA in removing a. 1:, teeal branch should be immodiately beyond the br+andi- ark "Idgeg.. ,preserving the branch t osser. )0 not make stab gois (an inch or ;snore b•,yond the branch collar). Do not make finish cuts (thMgh the branch imilar). f Tripply t or any branch too large to be held while being, r.L-i:, remdv a bar megns Of the 1. Undercut the brands J O to inches beyond the bane. 2. Cut off- r'he branch beiLid he undercut e 3. Remove the remcning stab ieai a shoulder cut. as described albmriv. . a Removal of terminal; (tip thinning and drop crotchingi _ ThInWng. "lace out' terminal portions of branches by cutting terminals back to laterals. basal diameter of the mmaining lateral shai,*d be 113 the diameter, tbrc`tertndna9 baistig rtrrio, ed,i [remove numerous small terminals avd laterals rather than taking out ar few large ones. .size reduction. To take out.portlons�'O t — -Own for reducing height, at.mov� termt ials bzct' to laterals. Each lateral should ®4 suitably situated to state as 'Ahe rti�EV terminal units', establishing the crown at a lower level. The basal diameter of a lateral she -uld be & least 113 the basal diameter of the termtral being removed. (laterals srnailertha^i this cannot hinction effectsaely 0 new terminals. acid the effect. Is then similar to a stlib cv t.) Pruning functions Not all of the following Procedures will apply to any one tree. and two or M04 nay more or less simultaneously, in most c.ses, however, pruning, done in trill genex al eduer: a will be more efficient and will hel,P avoid unnecewrasry pruning. As a rule. not more than ;/d of the total foliage mass sho.tsld he removed at onj!,,pruning. Exceptions are: (1) extreme thinning of heavy crowns of brltOe trees, such as lawn-grown (irrigated, kaffirboom coral trees, and (2) severe thinning of crowns to prevent blew -drawn i<hen root laruning is done. A. Clearing. 1emove :branches as needed. and redirect new gF�sw�. � near pede�tria��a�:i vehicular traffic areas. buildings. outdoor lights. wails and other objects. as we l" as d � shrubs,, Do not make stub cuts. Do not cut termin& —h tk to very small laterals. i;`etain scref;n effe much as posslble. i3. Remover of dead, brokLin, diseased or rrrarkedly;unthrifty aarancbe, C. Removal of crossing branches rind thrs'e which will beerame crc sin,rC blanche , s .has suckers. water sprouts, and branches ju -cwln vigorously into tree frtera�r of rile os��r�ni,, '., u D iZt'tittlVail 8f sus w rid, r ed Miles lteniMb Most branches .a,, in less tE �n 0 �: , - r E ee cs ,t;. t:uca� ptu end r ^crsperm`vaisieir tt ac r, m i bitjjs:l -lea narr`cu- j angled branch need.q to be r1:�.,asined for the-sake ot farm. it sheuld be ' tighteRe'agin grow th to reduce darger of Mqd areakag o c3 restr,cte� I Remaysi of poraliel tsranchas if :w; inch0* within a Est or aaF eavta other run „parallel far several feet along 0e17 main sagas, h+s less dssiiikle ore sixes; ir4 fAken outw,`, R ' pfbnin� for balance and %rift. i, Tta rnaintalt Ratuf ai Siga if a tree grtws in antGtialanced manner+hict; is a ° ) unsttractiue, of which c a tyi h at (or ' �> Potential hass;rd las<srsay cur �vtth ai�la�o pisses, for = C, 1117W. remove such branchi'_o as'm 4yneed beeAminato to :estare More typical fcrm or to rninimire the perceived hazird, 2. To aittor nat&rai shape. Fo ir t s.°a rsOue or rorma�eiiectss leg.. egmlless, beev$. nred 1 (� spedMtns or "I garden styiesr, .runly 10 a +mantes and freque6q, appropriate :to the lntene.;,a'rff G. pruning to reduce wind re3sistanci (Ncft : titre u -\ b�. few trees. such as biter ro+shet I h+► ice. i -im4'kaffirboom cord l awl ict # z �teci wf s t sl re ults�:a shallow rooted sp�ra� with excess ly +tall. heavily Wfa�, d tri these are SUscvUbte to blow -clown or limb brekkage in high winds. This annual thirin& it does �of call for toppinW beheading tall cr dense treew -ulo. their asRti vitality; arse! fntensifles `.. wine€ haa�ardsIq sebsequent yes l This fi �� t tYl �`` 9nhtng s1 ul;�j dptae trik eecttovlttg a large nummt'ei of sit; 9 branches rather than a fevl lac r nc !, r' he end +aff s ttaukl lnEe.rt rtc�se ate dse c rigid l form but wslh a I Easy opxnness. � -, hI. Pruning for size reduction (bate: xrany, -trees are fin' )Wr ttes where i6p! ndtor roots at < j Maturity will far exceed the ay S�tb!- spa, , Unless the t ree, a 49f:60onal sralua !whether monetary or Si6timantalj. itshou) ro laced with a esiet. aving a sulow rr,mii Tiiazure l size.i $ If a tree's value warrant sl cia -y it usulty hoeds to t trimmed once'tar twice a year in soutijarrtaiElraocr. rbquire cyan tzio:`$ fr t Naturat Wuntng. To rarain t�acs.:�. �O � � n� p!�snin$ . .,^s - ` sa: trictin . riuinoly. IMOnereus small teraninars ansi laterals try llrtt!"41 e-1 arcirl €fr. if the: tree has bten a'lowed tea +�vaWow the sic :, ends ► recguires racb e r duceipn, thz graces should tw done in stag Ves ss��r, a two to fear yt-ar period. 2. Sheadne. For fs3'rr 1 appotarance. o `i restrlct t and root rorr�ttt o €areas rt' iarkl limited a mz% shesr tkv tc� four t#m s` i� wally. g y One criterion o� quality pruning that a Properly, triditr:ed tree seldom looks pruned to jhe untr�ineci c. 1r it is very obvious that tree has just been ptuned. it has probably be+eer pruned irscortroctl�+- %i” ov ol it �r;.' :1 :,• `' 1 \. ' ,pal, ,�� - NOW TO SPECIFY AND RECOGNIZE NIZE QUALITY P'3i;[lNRO Alden Kelley, Arborlst L Basic essentlafs a, No topping and no stubs,, b, Remove numerous sMigil btQRches rather.,thaf► a few' large .ryes, c. Remove any k,!`K� ck to a lateral ait least 113 the diameter of the cut d Remove any laterafibaclt to the stem from which Itlar ryes;. e. Remover .sat more than 114 of the foitcse at arty ores pruning. J a, Types cf cuts a. Lateral branch. The final cut on lae brbno zh(uid bei 31mw lejr cna.) ,fists is a cyst which leaves the swollen or,wrinkled bare of tale braz;,ch, A stub cut: leave -, more than the bratt:ch sltesuit rd A flush lh cu: Ia smooth ecrtiiig thn WS, *f to-the base of the brarchl cutsrthrough the shoulder, vmaging the trees defense nrrd recovery system. b. T�, ral wck to .The f ?:sal cut on a terminal branch should have these feigures: E bads to a lateral hav n}l a basil dlameter �s least 113 the diameter of," the cur made, �. Ins: cut should be close to the top of the lateral, but not &0 close as to cut into the sh der or the lateral. 3. The slant of the cut should be or,a It a with the angle of the lateral. 3. Kinds of branches to be removed - 4 Clear walks, traffiMays. buildings and other ma -Made structures. Clear s other trees, plants as needed; b. Bead- b:Vkear, d4ramd or wait brancrts, (Also stabs left by p ;�avious tsrsrrsers) j) C. Cro j r} r branches This includes potentially cro- ssing branches, so shoots !water sproutsl and vidcrtlus. interior- di.-elct,-ad brar:ches should go. d. Narmw crokh -ample braKcka For rest kinds of trees, brarwhes with a crotch angle narro*es than 34 degree$ should be removed. e, ;?arallel 6FOrlrfia. Branches less than a ,fact apart which run parallel for ;several feet may even- i tually damage each other. The less desirable one sivuld go. f, Wind - breakage dsk - crowns that are Yea high art4lor too de,%e- should be thinned, and sometimes,30wered to suitible lataral&� Redurjng wised resistance by thinroing out, many small branches is safer and is better car the arse than talring out sev =rat large ttr1€. g Branches enepal branching left disru ,tee« (arm: Excess►�ely vi gora��s branches, or tits;; whlsh -un a ai is anchirs g net.n gati,rn. should be <rirnsned'fpre±ter balarr�.e and shad' . !This does n ' mean the tree !must be made perfectly slrmmetr cal: ym,netry as sett .�r n bit both attract and safes r' `', 4. Ri'40 iZin i3n g proper nettltia+g Thest features Characterize a well - trimmest tree: d. No stubs. b. Numerous small curs: few or no cuts +aver, 2 Inches In diameter, c. in general. riot ;more than ilk of the foliage rernoved. d. No apparen4 ,crassing branches. e. Pew or no narrswaangles crotghes arising from the main trunk. A natural- Pacski -ltig Shope. with #nest brandies (.rowing reawly tpI'edominantly outward and and upward. g. The tree should not loon "Wail; eOe% Like a good haircut, It shoOd not be obvious that it hits been trimmed. if it is conspicuisus that the tree has been pruned, it has probably been d:,ne incorrectly. *In cor►'aIn high wind-hazard *rim, and in ca df heavy root prutjip,�9, it may be appropriate f to remove Ili to 112 of the f011agt= . i . !Vote: if you are not certain whseh;er A tree trt- Anntr,wljP prune to these 5pecifls tlAns, ti left at she very feast have hire sitar t h paYment for the service is conditioned on no Popping and no sttga at �J the pruning 5. EffeCU of topping Topping latw called b.,- Kling, hars*11 -19. p01ler41'110 coe-lsists of cutting the major branch systr:rn bade to stub, andfor % lery s iaij laterals. j Thla pracdce is on the .increase, and because mast 'professionals do it Most the tune, rso, professionals accept; it pis being all rlgb p f•Poweve r, here are some of the results of tof pine: ti a. Branch stubs or.entire trees Bari die from the shack f b. When the stub -lives. usually many,heGv shoots are 040duced lust below the cut. f c. New branches in the r#Vowth after stubbing are charac�sized lay; I being too a103e together, I Illi being weakly at heck r f having very narrow crotch sin,gi : growing too fast: and then' ftre,being weak and bfi>,tle. d. Unless connective pruning Is do, the ;+rind breakage hazard can ,soon become greater than it was before topping. I e. T axe tree Is Mom suscepftle to disease. f The tree's life expectancy is reduced. l g. The tr 's natural form is destroyed, Ev�bn with CaTchil, � tanePr-lual corrective prunir-lt i'here- afire +r. the tree can never attain its origirial pote -iVal for beauty, usefulness. safeness or S property value: h. the real estate value of the tree Ps reduced by about 20% to 100%. It takes s5-l:ist t,"�4s Vears just to come back to their pre - topping value. i . In the long run, a topped tree can readily become a hazardous liability. The corrects Ir. tr:o. needed to avoid this often costs more than - wality Pruning over the same period. --- Cd° QFRAN(NiO+ua1CAMG?NGA Ah STAFF REPORT DAM February Z4, 1988 z TO, Chairman an6 Merbers of Planning Cex 4,ssior PROM: Bzrr Nan$ort, Senior Civil,Enginc-er By, Be iy Miller; Assistart' Civil Engineer SUBJECT: QErVE1,t1FfRCPiT R €ltlEbi 0-46 >y43DifiC`ATljit4 b CD{f#rEfi - A request tts" m5clify a can oi` approv -4 Tequrr,.ng ' t `atymetrt a an 4n- lieu ` lieu Fee for the future underrrounding of 'existin%,;..pverhead , utilities al 004 Beryl Street for a proposed Metal of'f'ice , building at the southwest corner. of Sass* Line Road And Beryl Street APW 208 - -93-10 pro? c" was approved by the Planning Commission in October 28, cd 1987, st[WeCt to a nditioar to fray an in -lieu fee for (+ne -half the c63t, Of "I undergraundinq of utxiitiespalang Beryl Street. The iopoission waived the requirement for fee 00y4-ent for utilities 'undergrounding along Base ! ia0"Road. The Developer is pow requesting that he be relieved of the fee payment requirement for BQyi; Street undergrounding as v?oll. mr, ri-,quest 'letter is attached as Exhibit "G" f `l The limits of the frontagd used to *t$rmfne undergrqufiding fee, are Shawn an Exhibit "C ". Tire Developer contc�rrids thyw. zty�t,..rpplicatierr of the Utilities Underground Policy imposes an excessive hardship upon this property for tht a ree.ons. First, he contends brat off -site inteoroven, tints, including the undergrounding ,of utiliti-is, were done when,,Tract 9423 (which included this site) was develoged and th &t' the owners of this Iai* have alrezdy paid heir snare di that tract's development costs, l 'ract X3423 i4s recorded in 1950, and, with- the exception of this lot, is fully baitt. Current policy does_. not specifically exenpt a lsroject' from undergraunding requirassents because improvements adOacefft to he site r: alreadyl;, exist. 10 -fact, this concept . was discussed dur ing the formulation of the exempt, proieet list acid `rat dtzcided that it would not ., be lncauded, Rya, st'af'f ftals than it is unlikely th #t the ori�tna' t r Tract 9421 cgntrib�tted to tyre undergrounding of aksy ex =np overheb , utilities, ; �j �i�...� S �. ITEM 0 J� c jj C5 i.% PLANNING crossra STAFF REPORT DR 87 -45 - cooper Modification. February 2,�n 1988 �a c Raga 2 7 Secondly, the Devei per-, sug ,, sts t61a, C singe prope4ie:. on the east side of Beryl' Street aWq Ghe north say,. of Base Vne Road are already 1 developed, the possibility of uneirri- ounding is' remote. in the near future. Discussion of this issue at, ihs approya hearing assumed that t", o, property on the east side of Jhryl Street - would be redeveloped "in thr future (parcels 16, 18 and S5`on Exhibit "A°ll.. The property hat" a current Development District Oesignation -of "!. "! which would yield a maximudi 04 6 R , cels, and probably' less,,, because ;;access limitations ti , Base Line Road taay require land for an additional street. It wo,uld"'� appear UnecontmEical to ,remove -2 misting residerk)res to construct 5 or less new, ones 'considering the cast of street;.iacbrdvavents and utility undergrounding,, The Developer's third &;,iq is thrt the ratio oftperimeter frontage, gip" area is unusually high for this lot, cAs, a rasg1t, , the undergroust.iing fee is S,�cessive pn a per acre basis. The fee anc► cost per acre "nugyirs presenter fl Orly the applicant are Orly accurate (si,aff copulates $Q�' 6 and 372 ,,225 per acre respealve yli. Mr Hanson does not r4call'tel' {`i tht applicant that the average cost for projecti, is $2OjMO per acre; In fact, i�, would be iteartiy impossible to deterrp, ne an 6erage cost per .acFa. fgr.t rojects. Perhaps a Wnent was �e to the- effect that (i (i06 $2, } per acre is fai 3y comn}aki.- The applicant als states thi�t a of A located project: similar size mid -block wnuldq pay t ss'than 1/4 the fee iharcyed this pjrcel. Apparently use is cr pal "ing the Base Line Road frontage to the teng_h required along Seryl treet (94 + 321 - 0.29). ` This snag Indicate that he is wilting to pay a fee Based upon the Base Line Road instead of the Beryl Street frontage. 111. t�LUS12t: At the appro t hearing, 0.0 Plan,p ing comm 3tsloq acknowledged that the requirement utility fees for boo the Base Lite Road an"ery,-S,;rpet frontages di impose a Wardship on the project and consequently detet�d 0,-',Road . the Base Li Road frontage. The Beryl Street fronta�� was�retairRd because it that there was a reasonable, 4haGnce forl�'°±� laiknent of the prflp ^t 'on the east side of the street, As ntat,4"ihis now appears Is.; likely.; Therefore, it 'is perhaps, as reasonable and ,:z ��.,e equitable ;requ1re a fee payment for the c�shoFter ( less costly) Base q Line Road outage (1241) instQad of the,,,4rren�,Beryl Street frontage,> ,l � r � _. ..,,X. PLC .`itdtti& COMMISSION STAFF REPORT \\ DR 87 -45 Coopwmodification February 24, 1988 it It is ftcommend44 th t the Planning COWssioil relieve thie "teve . er of the condition to pay an ire -lieu ffe,� for future undergr�unIfig of utilities" 'On Heryl Streets while reinstating the in -lieu fee for Base C`� Line road. If zfter consideration of 191 inpct, the Planning Comissisn concurs with this reco0*ndati6n, adoption of the atl chect Resolution would be appropr0te, Respectfully submitted; } �' t 1104' r r BH:BMcsjm ' �l\ Attachments:_ Locatiowmao (Exhibit ° "A "j - Request Letter (Exhibit Utility Locations (Exhibit _"01,) . Original Approval Re."Tuti� Minutes of October 28, 1987, :+fleeting ` Amended Approval Resolution I 0,• � y r 1(� S Il I � i 7Q ZIP ar 4 ZA *0 t sit. . Lu- 0) tiff s / i F F� �i j1� 3 �4 b.4 ;2n,iE ;sS �f l f M1 Y ANI Jaanuary 2s, 107 City of kanchb� cucaftiongaa Planning on44+s tsssian `9320 Baseline Paa d IUM p o gucaYor'121e, A 91. 7 q M DIR.7 -45a . 1f.lao Buildings at the southwestt corner, of S- a80114' s and Beryl toar Pl a finqi �\ �xti:�sriorasaxss; �.` lax wri i.ng this hotter too request Your reconsideration regaardiAl the► 04rrQAt f'VndlP619rOuX1dih9 Of Utilities" C1rdinanco i as it; aa9plie34 to Out propoxtstd construction of a.' profesAionaal offico 'wild «.iaq. ' x rovrovont 4 looaal doctor sand his wife who are &in* residents Of Rancbc Cup,'OXOn0 who hove desired to via]6e ;� hubstantiaGl- o %t meat in yours, sand tfi eir comity', T* tor, has desired to build a madical office buildin - ° thrt ia3giaess>Ft gu:l fn"OOM'-sti-OD ty, b0th in atchitectuwa , desion rs quality of mat* ialsbs. ',c"�vise desires woos astu�sd by has striot application and of your "Undsrgrounding of utilitieso u crdi{ aver as it aojjts to tho lot chosen which is located at i t$im 019 carw)r of ,Baseline 4W beryl. As we have ' � p .,rooAe&sd into wer, 3Cing drawings, we, haV ft come to realize the Ooctor'4 dassiras for such as high quality office bui ing whiswh +pl.oys such ex"nalve .exterior materials co Rod with, tt;,aesa: extraordinary high fe*s has thrown the construction budget for that protect beyorkAd what the building would be apPrai;s>�d, for, thus maaki:1g than construction and financing of tbQ prcJect most isapractical., This property i,s a residual lot that fallas within a 'off {ce- 1 profustiOnasal" z;Ofi* that was wart of ai Previously built out residential tract. The lot is Also an infill, lot surrounded by existing devirlopmItts and has unust4 &11,r :.ong� sand !Boom t. �hxL"eot::"Mt jc.a:i� a The strict appl,icat.lan of your Ordinance-, therefore, imposes an excessive hatardship upon this propasstty that would not exist _ i1 on many other properties throughout the City. was would, / therefore, ask.youat consideration of the following circum- stances that btvs ,all come to4 r on this aw pr*porty. As was stated earlier, this 10t is & pairt of l/ an earlier devol,ap nt tract in which. all Can and Offsito improvements, including the undorgrounding of utilities, was done at the time the roast of the tract was developed,. The current owners at that time paid for their g!+ #eRFr Iw'3 3� a� 13" �MI S -.n v ,full and cmpleto share of underga;ounding all utilities w MIB 1.001 t5HA�. No�� they mush pals 50% of the coat to rz °nderq. "ae:ru3 the utilities acmes th* street. This truly sefsars to be n tctail --- =03_eanahie .bur - ier -4 r -t ea - - -- - 4 _ r �roFer"tY, . ......� _ ' 2. anothat practical observetian wi would desire the C9mmissicr.srss to muss is that the properties &czoaa SaX0.1inO and 301, 3 , are OxiXtitig "tablisheed developments and the jkizsibi,l�. ty and/or feasibility of these utility servip6es beeiM7 undergrounded any - ' wilars in the neur future is very re te. 3. Because oft the 10t9 k\ Ong ar;A1 narroW dimnsionS, the ratio of the per star disc est to, the lotlx area is unusually high;� Sven ='Zoa tho fiontaga +gin Baseline same waived at he last Planning Goomi,asion Meeting, the frontage . Beryl when +extended to the center 1112e of Sareli " still rocults is a feet of approxi-etely 4 0" This is pea ti discunxion ! with Barry xtso 'yotl Dior Civil. Bngimwr. Since w,a have a�prosaeeat>~ely ��2 act* parcel., this i u%jXfl result in at feee cf ov44� A w ca hich is an incra+iibli en oc� at LOA �I Whereas leaf the ante six*, if lncat n e middle o the black,' _%Vuld only be charged lass than one�Wi;out -:h # of .;ice fee that this lot must bear. Mr. Banscn, in our diacusaion, told us that on an avaeraxgs thr Cae has been runhitag ' $20,,000 per acre. The Doctor is, therefore, fL.c*4,)'wit�h the decivioh of aeot aaey modifying the en*nsive, hL)O!' tiitr'sacterior treatment ssf the buil'tinq in order to comply with w at seen t' box an ettL�irme�ly un:air burden that he is be,'Mg ask to bear'lift' ord*r to develop property ,theft bat alrSady borne tote *Xrmnss of ardor.. gzoundin utilatias:. Therefore, in cuff,„ fusion, in revlawiaq the abovfe circumstances that have all come together tO heavily impact this one in. -fill lot, we would ask your reasonable consid6rar on as to what could be a more fair and equitable appl: on of the city" s ordinance as it recites to this *pacific - property. If you should have any further, 4uaationa,,planks@ do not hesitate ,t* * contact me at '(73.4) '591 -3961. Si j/a sly, Jc-1 C. Cooper � . �t lu _ BASED r4u*�4 �.�. 94, 6- �l r a I ird � j r!M RESOLUTION NO. 87.i92 A RESOLUTION OF TRZ RANCHO 1,UCAMOw0j PLANwmG CowISS3:oN APPROVING DEYE".OPMUT REVIE NO. ,, $;1 »45 FOR A VGySMRY OFFICE BUILDINS TOTALING 6,234 WARE FE'ST 09 0.6 ACRES OF LANCE LOCATED AT THE SOUWC:ST CORNER OF 9ERYL STREET AND BASE LINE ROA( IN THE OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT c A. Recitals. _. (i) Joel trooper `has filed an applica^ ion for the approval of DeveloPent Review No. 87 »45 aR 4es0fbed in the title of V14s Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Developw*nt Review requipst is referred to as the application*. (ii) On the of 2M Of October, 1987, the Plsnni'39 Comistion (►f the City Of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a A►eeting an the applic.►tion and concluded said melting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this p:* k+lutian have occurred. B. Resolution, ( NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby 'found, 48tarmined and resolved by the f Planning COmaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 0 I 1. This Commission hereby specifically inds than 1 Y 4 all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of '0111s Resolution are tlw;e and correct. 2. Based upon su stanti I !pvidenpe presented ta) this Commission during the above- referenced meeting r�i,tober 28, 1987, including written and oral staff reports, this Co+�missi er0bY specifically find:; as follows: (a) The applica n ;applies to property located at the southwest corner of Beryl Street d Base Line Road with a street frontage of 94 feet and lot depth of 261 feet and i;; presently vacant; and (b) The property to thie north Of the subject site is single family residential, the property to time sou;►t' of that site is single family residential, the property to the east is single family residential, and the property to the west is office anfsing►e family residential; and (c) The proposed proje, ;t complies with the Design Guidelines of the Development Code for the Office/'Professional District,, 3. Based upon the substantial =vidence presenteo to this Comission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: rl_ PLiw18tING COMIISStON rt�•._?l:11TI0H Flo. DEVE1.LtE' NT REVIU 87-46 - COOPER _ October 28, 1987 Page 2 C iai -lhat the proposed prajet,ct is 'g.,fttsistanx wit:1 the objoctivos +cf the 8anet el Plan; and M goat the propatAd -use is in atccord with the Objective of -110 004lopment Cade and the tht=iistgct in which the site its 1ocraoses and (c) 1114C thl' ProPcsed uxe is in compliance with ° each Of the aPPlicable oprovisions of the i Dev_tatoPmant Co4*;,an<1 (d) That tho pro o use -with the 1tiriance 87 -10, th the conditions appl.rcabtje to, will not bet dktritaentel to the Public health, safety, or welfare, or` i rially Injurious to properti i or 1;;rovei i is in tho, vicittit , 4. This Commissioe Jtereby flnds .and certires thatt the pre$ act has been ravlewed and consider d in, coaPlianc� with the California En+aironmental `further, j Quality Act of 170 and, this Coeaef I �treby i3s tee a l�gatiue Declaration. S. Based u00n #yet findipp and conclusions get" forth in paragraph° 1, 2 and 3 ahove�„ this Commission h r y approves *he application subject to each and every -ca lckl �~dit , set fo.'�tlor and 4n the attached Standard Conditions attasched�eretb and-,incorporated herein by this references. E trj The appro &I Of thin; project is grimed S0J*ct� tt.. the r-pProval of Variance 87 -1El. i2? The existin retaining wall, at the westerly and souther Prwperty boundaries shall be upgra"M with materials that provide compatibility to the brick buildfng. (3), The trash enclosure area at the t4atheely boundary stall be relocated to the scuthwasts f Side of the building. (4) The two foot wide plant" in the► middle of =` the! parkin rea shall lac eliminated and the planter f)ger at the entry drive shall be expanded to four feet wift l '` (5) Additioul landswaping such as `Sycamore , street trees mall be Provided betweatr 'ihec ° sideErtalk and the curb alg the Base tine `' ,. Road frontage, AMI (6) A COWW'ion of oars #n , hedgerow an4,�ar. a r low level screen vAll $3411 he provided within the landscape setback area ,ts *crten the parkia�g spaces feom Itryi Sheet. - < ib} - EnOnnear i Ivisinn f 13 ovArmad UtIl itiea on feryl . `,An in. lieu fee as contribu +;ion tF* 'furore undergrounding of tht existing overhead--,,j utilities (telscolmnivattats,, , and,, electrical ) on - he opp► lit& fade ofi�fltry Strut shall ,be paid -to the City prior to the issuance of buildlog permit. The ism shalt be ont »half the City adoptad unit amount times the, length from _ canter of ease Line' (toad to the mouth projs ct boundary: (2) No Stopping Anytime* zone shalt be provided on 8tryr Stviett and Base Line frantages, 61 The Deputy Secretary 3.a this Commission shill certify to the adoption 01 t ilu',Ressolution. APPROVEn AND AOc TTED THIS 48TH DRY OF OCTOSEk, 10M, rr PLANNING CW- '.SSION OF THE CITY OF RAIiCHO CJCAMOl R e Ow , cnal Haan G ra-� " U r'`,.a T 4 �y�, �Iy i R�tE5�li.U' ION ii . k October'��, 1987., �: ! Page 4 3r:ad 811lI rg ar" ty ;*retary -of tine Pttnnio# ttmWiSion of'thF Citr� of 3� ,rl artiry that t � f r 901IN o'�otion s.#0t7 Iknd gul Oly lntroduc*d, *Md. tnq' Ado te4' ?hv Ahe 114n►vtngr COWIW w' of the t:iEzy of Rancho Ctk:#M*fW' dl t, I%lVVler aMftivl Of ths'PlAn0ift9 �Caa ethos hold f E 1� an the V th of Octotor, M7, bi the follmM9 Trots- to -w#.- L RYES: � C i� iOii�S" CHt',,yER, TOL�STW.'V' ALAKESLEY, '&ERK � MCNIEL'- jll i Si -� CI II5 2 1EAJS`: NONE � ABSEItT# r Rs E _ rr _ {la `J!!!f - ` 1, Ow {p{ {��t`.Y u6y at 1 Ulf its g 4 q� x r Avg oil jut 1,51 1 O ,x PM 1 ve is it 1, J11 d. r _ !Rf. 6�F1 FRq l :➢iN ~ZgoJi°` iS i 4 v E Dy y gel R1 5 �� Fq t all - +id ( as p. _ s 1111 „ am YPytl�...gj iFegs .�2 i. »dig Zia if tv lit j's za; h a 19 -1 t"rj -11 1 j I; Isis ve if 1-1 +.� i w eti 1 g' t. av J_ : y -) 's uC rryygq�ff`4 N 'Mi M N far Eli N x� $ °_ � Apr -ate mJ CN JC 4r'Vw. 6�N/.9. N +� t� .JM16JR Cif any ly.. 4 ,'L.1 4 �i #;, wF A e x .. j�.. � a aw y Oy. `P t xh °tea =ur s: ®Nid 1 X T ��r „Ibn w� t�3 p 3 al �� V Ny L 4pti :4y1It •�y'°� j�M �fY its �y ^,. hC iF `pe�wXr 1�N JS it �: if �.. �LQ y��pww�ur�Lp ay ♦�� 4��( a �Pww. �� k i l NQq. QMr `yl[N® ►:Y� iiM��.. i'�� ti '� ra � s qqgg y ,j gi n- gI ilp - a.'S v� e�yxSY •� Y y w Sew Gs d �y0 yi�Y� �_. �� 'D .' e. ♦►Y eN ��N. �� +014 �Py y`•r +�M °1,♦,w fbu i LP� 41 YJ �.�i QeP `+y*u �G` ��" 4' w�lYs� Aeya �. ♦. g� a � R � _�y µ 6� Y »�Af a4s f� �N �'O� R�� M $ "''� �• b. w V ��' M yr i y N, +17i,. f ISO a+ o i N �T � e . yHai". � ®�•rqi ��i p��y s fie a°. NQ � ewe w�rJ� !�I w�b.� aLS��Y gf y {, Nal t•''7 i' Y rV *. wL V y♦y * wIMt3L. c � wG'N4� t tee„ "♦ N. }iq 4 u4 d sa c. M t j,j—,d !.Ili -- ,am 1 $" slit Zjjv 1-..1 .. ` ^, I P`° 1� fill all N-H S A yE ` e iY� $get I!* aill I fTkL 2 -. & ,q ®ice '. VA.'S 3 L' a $ y Iffa o. ' Iasi f Ra N� I� P 'I �7i •6a+ a°a�r � lS�� ^�, s,u "��$ ■`'"o ate'. , M V V N Y M fig V ft V��Y.._ iVV ::11 QQ N 7 ti lit r tip* $ z ER _2 Ssya Z 3 Pik y $ ♦ Na HIM Wlt ItsIQ yw .�5 « _ "Mt La- 1Nwl,. Y.p�rlr w �){ � 1 p -V)=— yy y AL Nk Z Ai UL M 4j� �� A_w �� Al I�giJ �♦ N�r � �..�P � N� -. �'��li�fl��»� N M v. w C V, wN. H 9M.�@ ;... a�i ra V f.� N ayYy4yN.. Wi y� 6 r i Y.J bit �� i� �c� ;O ie �. � Y � ♦'� �'�N bPi '!C: fillN P V i M g II l4 b ` Ix acs s �� J1 •i _s -60 fit If To ink AS zi W f� 11♦Y « �aw « q�eo iSasn :s 3i Xe it As gin lit SE - Us lit w YID r V « aw �' �y • 8SJ « ` g1 �1 ;0.: ♦� LAG ,� +� w ^� «� LIE «� «,� �s � ♦� 414 g�Y �� «s, �.� .�1 Im .A .. .« k3 i a. « « t —. s "a �W «` 6 b y WRwN`t N%J+'P� iiMW p a a _ , o$ ;, V gag s� gwc ��I1I V so It 1� i! �1 I y' W o A V ••i 3 iii.. �y yaks » `�p � 4 " fI*/d'e MY Y w 6• �rM M ■Y M ell irk! M�O l[.1, .CYy w� T.M.. apY Yw W 4s i. 1D D 1 4 v M. CONOII°Ia;.. / U PER141T s7��B MAm, OF CHRIST - A request as s a urc n sere ee, a an ex sting industrial complex locaitd;,at' 9223 AmbibAld .Avenut, Suites J" and R' in the General Inddstrfai, AMU. Subarea 4,, of ti# I *1srrial Sptcifi`c Plan District -APM 209- 2i3 -32.- s a presen, r" Chris Wastean A"JatanL Dinner tee tt* staff report. Chaimun 14044 opened the public hearing Sir. Ted NoW, r*PresentatiV* of #hit, church, stated there were no Coewsents at this tie* regarding 'the stiff roport. Chairean WNW :questioned and raistd � ;once w"itht he compatibility of t4--proposed use witht he adjacent resta0nrar�\ Mr. MOM stated there should not be any Baer problem with 'the church and the restaurant. Chairman Wool closed the public Bearing. Coea}issioner Tolstoy Stated the 4WIt parking lot needs to *I` de r convenient for tha congregation* exMt+erk_,ta park,c the church itself should be designed to encourage the use Of the eastorly parkin iot. The easterly ingressfegress areas of the church should I,hot be used q for storage area. f Brad Buller, City ,planner, stated a condition could . ;ire; put in the I resolution a addres this concern. Comissioner Ehitiea moved to , (�pprova the rvesol �.+�� on with the modification that the church designate and design the easterly entrances as the main entrance to the ChOPCh. Coamissiorer T4lsto;,; seconded the motion. Motion carried oy the falrigWi „g vote. AYES: COFMiISSIONERS. CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, 6LAXESLEY, EMERICK, MCKEL NOES; COlMlISSIONERS. NONE ASSENT: CONNISSIONERS. NONE 1 -carried N. ENVIRM. NTAL ASSESSMENT AND VAR14WCE 87.10 - COOPER - A request to re uce, tne average a seep ng roe ee IZ—V feet and the required parking sett ick from 25 feet to 17 feQt along a street frontage Of 130 feet, for a two-story Project n Restin the Office /Professional Distric,coated a the southwest t corner of Beryl Street acid base line Road - APH 208 - 593.10. Planning Ccmeission Minutes -.9 Octobers 198 lj _ / �. map 87.45 t OtiRER . lIEVELOtNi "*;;0'7 EiEc^ and ! fcN1R0NS:NEttl cis arN! bQ "0f gland in °' the a on south+�e5t corner of ;) U. eve 200 office- bd'�fiiikn9 d at uses d File- Aff es 0 fassicil District. 1ocA APN 209 539.10• Relate Beryl Stroot a� �ASe Line Road 87 -'10. ff report. o �arnanee resented ..� stet cia� Ri'anner= � , Nancy Fong. �lssaned thv Public hearing. for t� dol�io Chairman McNia1 opened Chi :consul ri q fir t_oEasf do Drive, t? ing tlme undarirrous►ding of Cooper, 4091 Rive dit e, applicant is y Joel stag `,messed the issue oCc,Vd. Mr. is the aPPlint, wing who Cotiper also- t was d3uble directly awross f isw.ilding: felt the aPF the proper"�Y dire toff► der "Mities and x'273 �eMl» �r of and tY,a etfec ttw Parking siifa'� coningt1d in.rnase or Ms. LOr0tta usstio�►ed soon the street, 3r et,�' vistrtvPASO fry► •. tb* property ►ter 91 stated re aas a zondntloe or a red> FtYnMre` stated stopping as WLYtit* Nana Fong. ASS 9ate , ires a° street• actio,,to the cuO Qn the Pr 3 t of has no obi of thk i tt...tsiad +a�ta1 iha t king` 7353 Q,arne elevation, the Mr. Gt°rdut �e-ja the a+ the exteriori cfnthe aauntains and prol+ic si'i 1 V-cess, buildings stated �uhat everyone has lost their v 1'2t. rimafy concert. that i�« total :•�ig�'" of the thi y i s a P - P1 anner, stated Fong: As,sociaro nd is 25 feat• pith staff 4P the Nancy fro* I j he 9 building applicsnt would ;+ork the toaoPer si;ated th6t tAr. �, _ lighting issue. public hearing, ,a* %,%n4d proltct and Chairman McKiel closed t a vary We'll ' 1, stated this is to neighborhood. rgrourKitng issue CoMissioneld�betan asset and quoted felt it neor }, ,�asad !It coated Hier Civil Engi sus und any existing Barry* Ive the applicanVIhat t ''t did not nr� and inforQed articular P ro$� are la++. Shin p as %sad' for the ut3tiites•,:� the applicant is being- lIA the far* of in- del clarifi that Base ae and aw Chairman Mc, fifty percents r undergroundnng, lieu fees. October, 28+ 1987 -, 10 Plan "�nS Ciss tun Minsctes ; � JS Comisrsioner Chitiea stated she felt in this particularly case she would T suppoat the request of vxemptioA. Barry* Hans% Senior Civil Engineer, stated this is 1 Corner parcel. Comissfonar Torlsta ,agresed with Cowixstiiontr Cbitiet. regarding the in* lieu undergrouding foss Barry* tiansus w Sanipr Civil kngtwe, 'stated the probability of the Overhead tines on fuss fine going underground is iow with developer contribution. Conmissioner ]mIwrick stated wince they have already underground$d tha utilities once, the Cam iWsion _ shc!;d 0A 'tic the, fn-lfeu fogs. Coeeaissi4ner BiakitslaY cokzarrre4_*ith Ct 4ssiomr toarick. Barry* Hanson, Sontier _, vil Eisgin r, ; RESOLQTION NO,. \\ t RESO1.UTxON OF TAE P,ANCHO CUCAN)NGA FLA, ING COMMISSION iPR0�3IK A MiODIFICATION OF A CONDITION `OF "-APPROVAL F' - i, �XELGPMENT REVIEW NO. BY -46 FORA TWO -STORY OFFICE tl I B' LOING TOTALING 5,234 SQUARE FOET.ON 0.6 ACRE': OF .AND I> L OOTED AT THE $0MT rST CORN..R. R BERYL: STREET ARD SASE _ IN "00 IN JHE OFFICE PROFESSUVAL DISTRICT.` -' WHEREAS, on the 1st day of FNbruaFy, 1988, a request fora o modification of conditions was filed -,by Mr 3. C. Cooper for the above stated project. WHEREAS, thaw 24th day of Fehr vary, 1988, the Rancho Cu,.aWk�'Myga Planning Commission considered tiu� above - described condition modific -I, FOLLOWS: NOW. THEREFORE, THE RANC.4O _rCUCAW4GA PLANNING COMMISSION RES VED=AS SECTION 1: That Condition (1) under Engirteering.Zvi ision of W7_ ut on Na. 87 -192 shall be eNodifieda� i�`"�fows: "he words "Beryl Street" do the first line?�hall be replaced with "Base Line Road." And the 'fast 4 ;entente sti ll read, "The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Beryl Street to the west project boundary. Aft APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ,24TH CAY Ol= FEBRUARY, 1988, r- t PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF kANCHO CUCAMtONGA � BY: r arry, . ATTEST: ra u er, Depu y ecre"ry I, Brad:Auller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cow issiGn of the City of Rancho tiiramonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing P.esalution was duly and regularly' introduced, passed, and adoged' lay the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of February; 19:38, by the following Vote -to -wit: c AYES: COMMISSIONER$: NOES. COMMISSIONERS: J ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. \` a In U oo �, %0 G a • :: oe �� iSStQn 2�+ 190 the �,ad�ta9 ary rs �� .: -� e 4 , �• ai'�'ae d pity pta eY�ner: -- �fi ri��1' 1.dt �rEc'�+ e �,5 d Better. tart pta /ks aEy ' r tape bpi 'Dist qp. era Ga4es Assts egS e..ee np Q'1a'�'�e d gy : eNV1 PP� i7 to ECis ied gJ tj�p5 � r eaH � ge Fit-f •. � ` IOUt &jv%(4 e(eva e ?N, Qvattar� fan. m. ,yea 151 ti eGt Pe esta�,i�e �eubaY �Sbarea �Ce ;' F qoa Re ce o a ; d 1Qnt u T'`at � s rtat t `Seba �$ SSV.an a ' heavy ,' aestr Hera Syr (R`� : Heavy y in yrre�na �1 �9 � a uffie ur'�ag e• � He ivy �'a �,�titY �? �`, , 'Y east r Gn�tN �1est 151 atinres rtat pest n us SO Herat Pta 4 014, ,in� va�a�ard 4i nd er "Corr ddust tat Yentty dens s a Yndva't t is Y� ateaead to ate 9• ndc. si th ye eth �t 1 e 6f of rem ads ate Gad' vas •. wavy tt�S: istt ,lera u #d slt (O�t "' ISO y(es asteris a 01% te, trees aid h th Ghat ve9e, aU the ie9 d vm he P tart take t {cc ID. es 9^ anr3 AQ of , trees{c estpera trees tmar�d str it q,$-O Stogy s far�reeaPpvar fo he Gr tt6�1 p Ye; ded 0 ,,.. l - t 'f KMNING COMMISSION, STMF REPORT DR 87-51 - fontaft 'Stsel, Inc. February 24, 1468 .. Page 2 f E.AParking fia7culationst ( Number of lknr of f 11 TY 'r � 5oare rkin� Spates., Spaces of Office Foo..._.� _.pAti ._ Ra irY j Pravi,ded l14,001 I /250 62 69 Manufacturing 36,250 WOO 73 69 Warehouse 32„640 WOOD 33 : � 34 To z . *Note: Adequate space, is available on the site to accommodate J j three adlitionax parking stalls, without advetely affecting cn -site circulation, The applicant hts Jrdicated that the three additional parking stalls will .be '.ovided Within tae auxiliary parking area,. II. AVALtSIS; \ I A. ;General: The Fontana Steep 'Corporatioa is i*questir, approval ,y to es a lish a steel fabrication shop, stce -49t .,rear, nad related: administration building immediately adjacdrii to 15,e existing "lama facility to the south and Ameron Steel Co. the east. The selection of this -site allows for fre'e', transfer of steel ' products betwee -A the aforemention�� industries and the Fontana Steel shop -. An access paint f4 this purpose is provided ",. he ,tutheast port►on of,,the site. \� Due to the proximity of the site to the I -16 fryeway to the �\ nest, views into the "large loading /ci,*culation areas at the southern portion of the site are of significant Accordingly, a condition has bean included to recmire dense 1 evcrgreer, plantings ire a Staggered format along the We9terr, side bturdary, B. pex n Review Cbm ' ttee: The Design Review Committee SChitfea, o mn ffVidd j the project on January 21, 1988, A primary Moncern voiced by 'Pe COiiOttee Was the type of metal material which would bi7 used for the buildings, due to,, the design constraihts and aesthetic probltros pr4vlously I encountered with metal buildings. y if a the general fq+ and design of the buildings Were deemed 4.,or'oorfate, an altei'nat:ve type of metal siding mraterial �sa5 r -'4u 4 red t.6 simulate a -flub appearance ". .A brochure illustrating the specific material selected by the Design Review Dtmrmittex -Will ba available for the CommTssioh tq'�revleNa The Design Review Committee recommended approval of th4 request to the P?},Mlin comimiss {_an, subJect to the following conditions; a t Pt:Ra` IG C+OM4IWON STAF7 REPORT OR 87 -a1 - Fontana .Stsel, Inc. Febraary g4, 1986,: paw ill i Site PI an 1. pedestrian connections from parking area ✓Ito building t. entries should be strenghened and s ould, be dearly delineated. t' PeA.'strid ,apts:nities within },-& outdoor pi-6d sh rilite to �',1e building relativ�Ao. textures�r colors,` nC1;, design. Also, pedestrian ameolties should be +fixed in position wherever possible, 3. A sit (S) foot screenwall should Wzprovi4d along e acatherO pdrti,cn of` t►e easternmast,pt;iiing to area scro views of the loadin fl and storage; :: u ties: 44aterlals and design of the wall should W consiste nt with the treettae rt provi'ded other�lls on the site includfpg" a decc�ative cap. D 4. 'Ma retaining wall bet4�ln the pat%and parks*�`'��r2as %' should be at least four "� 4) faet. in height to *Aure adequate screEning t+te ptatid frN "Jacent ;�raf`f, impacts {noise,; l dusk,' etcQ The material, fur the k �, retaining wall should be compatible to the` building ' r,...,' 11 !kj < material (e.g. split face 004 with decovi: iiYe cap'). - l S. The special pavement trey pit at the'main building entry , i .. }a axpanc#ed -a+�d ail iii�anal hardscape sjtould b used .: to,�rrrarge and articulate this' 'entry. c 1. The plantet along ttp eastern site boundary, should 'be '`r i approximately f t` in width and should, be provided E, staggered plcri ngs of evergreens (e.g.. 10 feet on center) to ensure.,adequate scre ainq of loading and star, ge areas ��roet Arrow Route,, a Special 8041eva, S . Orly, the planner along the western site 'boundary should be provided staggered eplantinga of tali evergreens to mitigate _ potential views of roll - 'j -p doors and loading Areas from _ the freeway right -,of -way; ^ \ . shrub - massing should "be used to f screen" par 1AS area articulate project and bgflding entries, acid imprpxe, the �creening and ,privacy of'the patio area. t, L. ;1 - -----J PLANNING CWSSIOU STAFF RE ?ORT, !i87 -41, - Fontana Steel ruao 24 s 340$' Page 4 r'I 3,- The landscape piapntor between the pailo and parking areas should be increased . in width by apf�oximate6y four f4l feet to ensure sufficient space fir suo plaittings, 4, Annual_ colon plantfngs should he 6trlfs L,�k.� -kways as well as anhan ing thd'p�tio area, S Twee{ wells should bo provided within the psio area to ai]orr for canopy tree plantings and to ensure adequatA shading. Architecture r. `hO'COMW a supported, the e►:eral form 00d, of the facility; h however, recommended that darts brawn agpeette textur-id metal panr�T f; use a rectilinear recess ve "us trapezoidal t�, pr,00 crisper dines and to look less like . . a rr.MtJii building'. 1� ,, 2,h The nrnnsard overhang /fascia area ni;Igrovided the east ` b building e4evation shorted ,alsa be utilized a]'dng the southern building 11tvation. 3, The proposed white siding' for the facility shA•Ad be replaced with a more subtle color which ral3tss to °�he <:r textured' portiai,;�. of thd structure' to minimize the - )� visibility of stlaint, weathering, etc ;;' _ mote: Raviswzt ;,building elev�sSJons have,Aeeri,` submitted` o, address the Comarttoels concerns relative to*_,{" architectural" program, L'. Technical Revieti Committee, The Technic;% Revi' -w C sit ezhas I I reviewed a pro xc. an determined that.( %frith rodommenV�d ; conditions of approval, the pr oaect is cofigiV;Ient applicable City Standards avid Ordinances, PLANNING COIM;MISSION STPF REPORT �1 OR 87 -ti - FbnUna., Steel ". Inc.l February 249 1980 RECOMM1ENDAiittSi' taff re6mmends approval 0, Development b vk 0f, UZ-51 "IF'- urr5' alaptftur of the atta ted Resoliw114; trine con pions and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res ul ly s 'bNa Cted. 1 Bra srI r City Pl ner BB: GG:vc A6ia hunts• Exhfb-t "A " °¢ Location map' � " tXr�b %r 611 , Site Platxt, ExhitfiL "C = Wrth & West Building Elevations `East. dElevatfipns Mi6it South & Exhi hi t "E" Tree Removal Plan Tree Removal Permit Application BF�-Oi ResaTutfian of Approv41 with Condfi_tfons- } 1` J C . r � ieJ. tOt I ;141 EIV /z2�7.9; t r23.r3 AAAFFF ! , t 'tysasn 103 _ y Aiw 27 tue F9y r.� �l t � � ,�r.�4 ra s.7' ,•.�' _- r:rr.e ey _ N 4 a �u aea ? z �gy�l1 � rtI Y4 .' �q�iS ss rsnzcwi, �... .174C rr w+•r�.ro ns. g p :r eai. 9 V2 Rk 1CS.0 WA4 so Au CITY ClA..iICALY 'G DIVM N EXHIBIT; SCALE-.t i Ct`�S^/ ct>;6ASrr. F`s„i.,NTie.� .a � �r •• � M . 7 iC7T}{ 'r3Y r`9� Cia4tt E fit FA3'��r,, r•-ra.cc,��rh +<rNG W � , ,t . �^ ' : x �_ y',! If Ira 'StR c t ,z Eza' Soa-1 -yam+ -a ce 3= W. » ' .�y�. --� � - 1�.��i •� �r �� ...r mss: .=.s.� s , r r � rM <�ry dr►b.►4 +�M�r Art. w A Lz �� •-- '= r�.'�.. u(� ' is } ia�j'irssGG��ED �^ � �� G.. vE.ttGSL EAt i*LA,, m NC. - FoFt 5.fi rLi..�.- NiNtee f'WtsF'dS�S �r f �, AtON_ia EI+�ST �' vYCs.S"C� L�+pruPii�liiE.�s t ii i (CITY OF A- "F+rI ref PI-ANNtNG D(YISM EXHIBIT. f � 1�1 4 _ t „z ,x If • t +a.�.11� ►.iY��lly lbry � CITY CF T.. A O CU .1 �'1 ��. *y♦4am WON '�— ri�ptyt sYni KNt .- ilIRR.LSSMMp(E� � � � MN OF ITEM: RAINUD L 1 l\ - 'EXHIBIT: �...- ar- ....+ -� SCALE% t, fac VY+l,K _eTt •�?t7 ltiQ �Ct1'�afs � 5 rrW!« eIrw' °v .�.R.++wa.+sewwp�.+ �.4�iMLn«n.nro+"f • «...L,w• �w?�e� 3w.e«MA�Hr 4 �' Ltd[` LoT - f ls{r�!ac�e6tt�rtn4. tiv1+6�`t' t�- �SD1f�yy1yy��yyMya��y[y�� ! • �1 �7}.'l5� K, -Alt �911F ijlj —`777— .. o -NOM CITY GF, rrEM: MANNING EXV �( ':._A__.__� ALE a ' x RESOLUTION N0. 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING ComissiON � APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO- ,87 -51, LOCATED ON 'THE SDUTHSIOE OF ARROW ROUTE, WeST ' O.r ET -UANDA AVENUE, AND EAST OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISL. f1TILITY EASEWENT IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT A. `� Recitals. O? Fontana Steel Inc. h1`pp),filed °an application for the approval of Developeent Review No. 87 -51 has describe& in the tttle off., this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request Is referred 'to As "the application ". (ii) On the of 24th of. -february, 1985, the Planning Co►ami'ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga „Gonduct4d ,a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that, date. E (ill) All legal prerequisites to the ad0 ,11on_,of this Resolution have occurred. B. Res�,•utian. � Co ' THEREFORE4 It is hereby `fot nd, determined and resolved by the Planning mRaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as °fcliows: n, 1._ "'Ibis Co fission hereby specifically fiends that all° of the facts j set forth in the Recitals,, Part A,, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presenteC to this Go=fistvon 11during the above- referenced meetinipon February�34, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds ars %�l]o,rs: (a) The application applies to property located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of EtiwAnda Avenue and east of the `Southern California Edison Utility Easement with a street frontage of 873 feet and lot 1 depth of 710 feet and is presently vacant; and 1 (b) The property to the north of the subdeot site`;is vacant, the property to the south of that site 'consists of Heavy Manufacturing Uses, the property to the east ix developed with Heavy Manufacturing Uses, and the Ff property to the west i3 vacant, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during *he above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts 't forth in paragraph ,I and 2 above, this Commission hereby -finds and `concludes as follows: (A) That the proposed project 1� r`A,sistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and 1 c PLMNING OMISSION RESOLtT V DR 81 «5I - Fontan tt,�1, ini February�F, 19r Page., 2 W that th objectiv =-, purposes 1 ocaed; �' a (c) Thai. thi .1W f4 ; � J o aposed u in accord with the r the Deve` nt Code and the the district'm ich:t'he s,te is oposed use is In r�iance with A AnrdiaAhift nwnv 9nne nF "_ That ate proposed use,v .tth Jr with the cgnditi ins gplisabYell the to Vill not be detrime itai o the pybl`ic health; safety, or i welfarei or egg rially injurious to properties or impr rve+aet�ts in iha vicinity. 4. This Commis lion hereby finds A certifies that the project has been reviewed and eonsida �ed in compliance .,it,'t the Ctlifornis Environmental Quality Act of 1970 _rand,] further, this Co ission hereby issues f 'Wagative Declaration, G. Based upoia -the findtneg' and onclusions sot forth in paragraph I, 2`and 3 above, this CJNmkission hereby pproves the applicatio . ubject) to each and every eonditidr, set forth below and in the attachW Standard k Conditions attachedL,heratj6 and incorporated herein by this reference. € Conditions, � , (2) F'edestMan connections from parking° area: to b ild~ , `mtrtes sherl.be strengthened, and` learly k0inea}ed- 12) Peden Irian amenities thin t,a outdoor } c shall rie r ,O to the building rel aUv - {to textures, col ors, and desEgw. Final plaza design shall be subject,te \eeview 6 and approval by the City Planner. (3) A Sfi.Y i6) foot strQenwall shall be provided 'along the sotii;hern gorti pn of the eastern parking area to . screen vievis of the -leading and storage activities, hall Mats,rials and dett4wshall be consistent wtth=the other waVis on the site,l and shad i�clude aAncorative i :,ap. (4) The retaining wal" between the patio and paring areas shall be kt east faun {4) feet in height to ensure adequate screening of the patio -4rce parking i�ea._ The wall material shall" be consistent With the building design (i.e. split -face block with brick ca.). 4) . Special paveat treatent at the ma bui nq entry shall be expanded through the provision of ditional bards epe tlement$. fr G, ,. 0 c� _ PLANNING e"ISS'MN RESMUTION No. DR 87-5I -'Fontana Steal, In!! a February 24,, 1988 Pa94 3 (6l the pGariter rtlong the, eS�tea^n ite boundary shah be approx9iaiata°ly' 15 Beet in Wi his ar¢�, shall be provided `' s. agcef %d plants of <evergreens (eRg. 10 feet +)n } nter'I to ensure adequate screening of ,1;4dinq a�,nd" Storage, areas from Arrow Route, a SKGial Boulevard. Similatirly, the pla,'nter:-alon#. the wasterm site; hNndary sh bi prt3vided staggered plantings of.W 7 evergreens to igate ,{ potentfi�tl views oftrll -up daRr and loading ireas ",front the freewayr right -of -way. t (7� Shrub massing shall be uA :to sciree n parking areas, articu111ate P olaktt and building +entries, and improve the GrQeA�ing ant! privacy of the patio, atrea,' = (8x The landscape planiaar,betweta „ r,` ¢atio and parting areas shahs : be increased iri ;afdth lhy' apr- toximately. four �4) feet to ensumisufficie -t space for such 01anfiogs, r. (9) Annual color plantings shall be used tb dellhote entries r and walkways„ &s well as enhancing the patio area. 60} 7ree w.11s shall , be p'MVgded (titte:fn the patio area to = ° 1 allow for caaacpy 'tree piontia %gs and to ensure adequate � 4 111) exttrtd exterior walF panels ("Rockwall "} 'by l:,sulaced Ea;gel Systems `ae shall ttom far. th9, faaetlfty, or e�.tivalent, material as approved by the Design Review comgittee: '62) Thf, tpansard averhing /fascia 'treatment provided the east +el evatibn shall t1 so "be utilized al ong the j ' soutti.ern bulldimg elevaltion. I ( 1 ^s) 'rite;iosed white siding for the, facility sl.►al be r a with a more suttle color which ztla!tes Uo.AKe ions of tha structure t4 „iniaaiXg tli'e 7tdi�ibimdtypoofnstaimp, Weathering, etc.` 4i+ 1 e removaV of 20 pine t ees -An cbr:jumo.,tion with 11`v�Ae Removal Pewit 88-01 shalt requii4 replacement of= �%e tnZeS with the 'largest nursery grower trees avatlablt))t Any `additional pine trees whfch may interfere wither tlte; troj :t dellopr of ,__A T--he preserved through- reloca tln :;ere dell ({ el t the site. N 5)- A Dotal of 162 parking spaces shall be provided Special cQnditfons:� �1\ Ci {1} 7h.A� stfing,, overhead ,ukilitio telectrical„ except._ for the _kV elettricalj or4,the project <side of grow ito� la �f t, she' 'be undergroiaeded ilonq the entire .project front1c e to %the f ►•stim pale off,site least anO aeatt`�, C t, ' f ` o ,. LANNING CO*ISSION RESOLUTION NO.'' DR 87-51 - Fontana Steel, Inc. February 24, 1188 Page 4 prf6" Zupl C 1,improvemenj,s acceptance or occi,ipan, to p whtchave urs first. 71;e developer my requesf. a reimburseme agreement to recoyer one-h*lf th,� City In L adopted for future deva�;optont cos I undergrounding from ;7j , f4�as it occurs on the op,,oslte side,zf,,0e' ,'redevel o':54 streot, (2) Juneberry Drive - (_�.) shall 'be vacate,$ as a pvo'lic street, but retaito as- an access' ind,.utlilfty (itsc*n_t - fcr the southerly pro,,�erty to., the satisf4tion of, the, Mr Engineer'. (3) Private drtinar, easements or acceptance agrements �'tiall br; required frW the site to an appro,,,ed, drainage 44,tlet as�approved by the Building Officials. (4) Storm Drain SYStJMX (a) A public storn dtq�tn catch,.basin' in Arrow Rcutii with a private draloige line -.xtending thro5o; - the devilopers prr,,jx*rty,, shall be ciinstrectt�d ! M, � acceptance agreeiienk of' public _4ate(�s fr;it,"the "to developer and the property the south, I fi-) ths develolper's .3hall be required prior t ;ce of any building permits. Toe materfil'for- thelprivate drainage line shall be to the saf, ctio�� 'bf the 'Building Offftlal; or (b) A port4on - of the M*��ter Fi-an Stem Drain 'Hhe in Arrow --Route shall A -\constructed' with the�,j limits being deteiWned bj' 4e City Engineer. The�l Hester I Plan Stoy-*,,�,,Drain Line Will be ellqibii,�, fOr reimburzem0t. - Arrow Route shall be congtructeewith 'a mthimum gt�de Of 0.4% with a smooth transition to the existin4 pavexprit. I 6. The,2eputy Secretary to this Commission shaq cort fy to� the adopzion of this Resolution. C� APPROVED AND ADOTt,D THIS 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARV� 19k` 77 CORMISSION" 'THE OF' C i4 OF ,'PLANKING .-A'N'CWCV0.AM0_NGA ST., %,�T'Tgu!'!T�F,7epUy S#criq 't �: � - -:, ,; .,. - *°;:"a..w,�t�,'�aih a �.� •. � .. � � . r. DR V.;Z -1:. Fontana St al, Inc. _ J; �:r' l+ebruaey 24, 19$8 Page a � I,. Brad Boller, it put;Sevttary or the Planning tmmission of ant City, 1 f Rancho tuc wa do bervby cartIfy.that the fora ing'Resplution was duly ark; Cif regularly Rancho Cu�s.,ed, passed, and adoptad by the Planr4ng CoWssiQn of #46 y da= ate a regulur:.meettng of VA Planning Commission held 7; on the 24th day, of Febru aCY, 198, by the following vote -to -wit !AYES: Cox! ISS MERS.- , NOES: CDi+MlISSIMERS:„ ABSENT. s COMF4ISSIOW ..S. tiJ rt ll �j „0 _ ��_ k .may s `` I Zvi v }}rr j^ u KS t---Zs - I .. 1 ". fit :as ,sip —S sub I Lis .. r ^ '�s a .. A 1; , Y All Sit ,.. ►. °'..` z -v I M-1 1r 13 r w 111 ;t @. ®`Ysr.M�. 416 fiM'l1rY �� 4 RVJ 1:�` Qgj "�JC fit a- `j B:r. ��t.a'•ai �'�,� ,- 11b. b r eal 31 7-1 13 It a �.. "ate 4 � ' �`` -: u iS js; llY •1�� ,a�iy Nww M4 �� ° ��y��= sill a� s , i�L• 5 Iq is ! aF INAA i ray g • �!i m.g$ w �xu � ISM dry ffi p ■} Two ILI . �A�� d• Z 1'M, Jd °w f _z- i" y °' viii oil ° Q L).. �:_. 1691 • i• +4. t3 L: '� . '. 4:J�SQ�i�£�p.�le""r,3''kr� �uw��ttifxl"'�7d• E) R ♦W�g yam` Y N4 �Jr i3 s .� sc..a 5a 5 Y 5'�'� �~y�S' p3Qa �* fps W r 1-1: i.. ~ jz'� �rM kit RN r N _i' Z1 K_ r, ~ wi Khq +R�fi! � ��.. �.QY:�s� ;Y _ - � a °,,, � � « +i R� �� °•fib � '� glop was Yq lap JjjPj s a !� ads • N p it ia _u rr y�r ��►. ! N.N wl.. tl�sP 112 ZfA. Sul W 7� Ir ' S° � � �� N del •�� 01b ��A 4�:QY�S , is =2414 I S eu - w { t' 1 M� I., ?,�� \ • •t Y� a yy x 8� XiYe7. all Is Via; w s ��r IN ' isle Y +o i i •,� s r w 4 i�4Y- VN Sir iA O e 9 d` r ,. o rs !E � jr+ lF ° i tic i h p M E tt}} 4i• i fix all SB al Er I I f i 1C.- r P Ili 'I= - ji sc fit s EEE � auk, « elF a yg� I� b yk., �, 1 is r - •` � .Y � Y _ t If fill jjv�jjf :41 tilge a -a' I I I z p.p ,. Al e�, AA !7 " OR 'p, " °e SM "R In y 4 • C< O t �a rs721.� C '. g g �w &gk� pit s g w C��e¢y�p( �� Q� �aF ¢�+ ��1`e�, Aa� �� a �Lp ♦R�« .wp R �i �N �,� � 'I[ _ w ^l� �ypsr � e�',s G8a' ♦` •$�` = ...$ �, 7,G7 a, FF�"p a Y.�Yp y�. MYy�i I� Na N6 y A VY/ s »or.��eee.Y �Np NrwlR. b �.w_!N AS a f nisi If« p$s 's 2 v 2 t Ilk a t V "I Is lw �� Is Au iN0 w y lit , � -= j t . sit 1z , i$ _ r � ..�^ �j alt Fiji!. GMs �yy t; r y I-. .,a l� �$ it Aft i fit 4 41. . Y wei SO th 9 "All �• ..yaw • '� M � �, NW ..LY ?� :4=1 Ili, t �q� A ` w y� y L �Y�.. rM tl _MMY�pd. OVp i�vji JA II � y rpd OYS •it N',R AM= i � Ti � � \ �� y� 111 - l�11 !•` K/ 4 , -- ---- -- CITYDF RANCHO CUC.MUNGA: STAFF ]REPORT DATE; February 2"F, ]4`_, r ;r TO; Chaim and 3emhers of the Planning Commi,sion FRO14: Brad Buller, City Planner > 1977 Dan Cclem+an, Senior Planner SUBJECT; EM N TRANSFOPAERS I. BACKGROUND: Staff has, received the attached letter from the Southern ial_fforT1Ta.7Edfson Company irdicatirig that, as of January 1, ISIS; all new Installations of electricdl tray "si%romers will be padmotmnted type (above ground). :n the past, these transfornmers We Placed ii underground vaults within single famil;! resident -la ;l— �ighbarhoocts.' Above ground, pad mounted transformers will eefinitOy'have,,�n impact on the streetscape of ' a typical single family neighbo("Pad. Si;aff has contacted SCE and asked them to i,,iattend ton.fght's, meeting to ,answer any uesti6�urs fihat .the Commission might have. `Staff does have ser cus concern. with this new policy -arid will be w6rkin with " Ed~son in reviewin this k possible alternatiirf•.�, 9 9 policy. and According to SSE, these types of transformers arp xyp call-_. , "located on {�'f �f private property, eight feet behind curb° and withl��threi:`,eet of the r (front) p'.7;�erty line." Scre;Mrg`is al`rowed subject 'to .440 'Is minimum distance requirements. The attached drawiOg irtiicat -ts nat "any wall, fence 'or lanasc;pe screen must'-be at leas! 18 inches away from the sides and rear of 0-'e transformer. � the`- most f ni` an t' restriction ion on screening is that no galls, fences or landscaping would be allowed within eight feet o-A'Ile front of the transformer. One of the di` ficuliies of atteurmiptiemb to deal with transformers is ghat their Hrial location is not determined until after th4 City's design review process has been completed. Edison approves the locations using their criteria which do not address the aesthetic of tW transformers. T,yp'cally the City h;a no input into transformer.loeations. however staff dues ittempt to screen then., as required by the standard conditions of approl4l, through the landscape plan cheL& process, H. RELOW NDATION. This ite'd has been brought to the Commission fur /-your j TRA -AV on any no action 1ls necessary, Howevar should, the Co fission feel strongly about this, " - item. ;,N-ur comments wil l be forwarded to the City Council and eventually- to Southern California Edison. R tfull �eci Or u qqr _4 City Pinnd'A"°i BB:DCtvc n ". l� 9J r > Attachments; I.�4te�, from SCE t 1 rrEM Sd,��ieirt �eelI�orre�a i��s� Comrutny i `' 1451 i.4RANC, 5 OTRF,ET ONInVUO. CALIFORNIA 9179,1 Jari:ary 23, 1388 o �1 Arad B3 iller PlanuingE Manger city of/fRanc zo cuco ng& F ,io vox 86'1 R>avchd/ Cucama.1tga:, d;A 91730 r� l Mr; 73ullezz << <' Per our canversatio ;4 on Janurtry 21, 988; this k"atter is to �J o no !Efy you that, a� o Jane -l; ..lfi, all- il new itxnilatt3ota �tf de�r--ouzo trarescrmtekSj� .a "e�3 >c+tia1sPl±a�tnnri1 i tt+ ° a type (*love OtouAd). ,, / These types of transfOrmers ,grill typically be located art 'pri'vate property, ,eight ;relit beh'iz7d curke atnd withintrxee' eet of the property , line i The .dcme"lFfna� f *z th.esi transformers are f , heiq�hL 4411, width`. 4211 , and- dopth 0 m Wiese i �sinsfcr rs�my Fse screened by a brick wad - " other r 1 c = types of ,�tndacap�,, an It as, tab's struct�lres ma�xt. minimum dEstance J ecqu? r'eMoxita (s� a ,,enclosu,,e A 1' Tf y4u have any c *xil .ons ijA v ,ards to the encicsad � inf©rmw t.$sn,, or it you )would like to feet with Ghcryj "'i " "..a.rnw,, 4-A myself, - ToleAxe *'oll tot . e:, at (73$) `947-A227. *' 7f C 1L, o ` �( i! icha C@r4�� » :� Yr i` e' l -Y- . Custtun 2%n.ner Mg .d W. N ICA Veil V i ' STAFF oe r Oil DATE: February 24, 1988 TD, Chairman and Misers or, 'the Planning Commission FKOK,, Brad -dl 1er, City Plannetti 31Ct Otto Kroutil #oDeputy City Planner %461ECT: POTENT AL MWIFICATIONS TO THE LAND USE PROVISIONS OF THE 1, I. BACKGROUND: Staff hat rec�tiv+ed r request from Messenger Investment ompany xh bit "A ") to consider so diiications to the Land Use Provisions of Subarea 2 of the Industrial Specific Plana Specifically, it is. requested that'Subaree 2 land uses, be broadened to allow uses corhMtly not permitted within Sooarea 2, but permitted in adjacent S66ireas 1 and V. Becausf," the - `request would affect the enti• subarea- Af. >155 acvg %s' nd not`;just thi; Messenger j property, staf', is rexoes�� g pr�'tim nary dlscLes on,; qi this issue. 14 ford a endment413 the 11wP and _a Iulfv,publi, hearing would, of course, be necessary prior to an�,rchartge in ,existing regulations, II. ISSUES'FOR CONSIDERAT1bU: Subareas 1, 2,`'ard 3 -are located in the wes.er y por on o a Industrial Specific P!s= and are all consideree-, General ` Indus�Irial in nature see \� hibit "B "), However, the provisions Cs ntrol x ing development whirl, Subarea 2 differ e t in that .iignificant emphasis is placed,. on manufacturing,. rehousing, and rail access. The ISP- outline:, the primary 6netion of Subarea 2 as follows: "The long range plan `or this subarea -4 to strengthen its `~ manufacturing and warehodsing activitfes,_compl "rated by r0l I access. Portions of this subarea have leadlspeT rail linss proposed to accomm4ate rail service needs a cindustrial uses, It is the City's policy to encourage the development of rail service facilities on parcels wjth strong rail development po,Ontial. Stendards have bPwn e tAb��so ` as part of the Specific Plat (Part III, Section 1VI is - require the; rail service development of all pareeLfl��ch adjoin exiting or ,Proposed lead /spur rail lines. This, subarea is hounded on the north. 'by Arrow Route, on � east by Hellman Avenuci on the south by 8th Street, and or?. nest ;by Vineyard Ave -,ue. Of the 165 acres in the subs; %rea approximately 80 a ,es are- occupied by exi- log industrial ° uses, Mont of wisicil acre served by ruff." f - s ITEM P - C J PM&DA COMMLi 109 <5 -1AFf REPORT, AMENDMENT TO SURA,*?EA 2 OF, ISR , o As a result of th.�s policy, the 11"wigs of curr,1ent;,y xfermiteed or conditionally permitted uses in Subarea is Vnificantly narrower than the Z4Jacen} Subareas I and 3 Tis wa ;; done 9(nter�tfona�llyf allowing adisinis..rative of'fiCft, deifgnr er'+(ieet, financial a $ ?intent with the of ericouraging',, draft i er��j in�this subarea., If gr- ;ited, the McIMA r~ re est th apwd el ireinate t,r differences , betwt;_er Subarea, where them' -3rL exfxting rail spurs, and Subatics I and 3 where' none axis, or are rilanned at this tine. The letter submitted to •;h Cemissign cditterids that the existing provisions wilt assume rail development potential in this subarea j art in error. W I etUr al to notes the countr,y's tendthcy to Lufacturing-ori evolve frtHa a �• r rtee econow ton service- triented I ectir+o r, and points out a yorrtl1 •drag to rail serilce needs, (please see the letter-, Exhibit', :fir Arrow Business Park: �e reasen for request to broader!_the an uses n e area is tyre rtts ent"Y taro Ate4i Arrcva ,business Par; by Messenger lnvestme"t Co�!'(Exhl�ft `�PhW' 1 of "the W04ect, f Ling Arrow Route consists of € « }'' acr.*,q; of multi- »tonant,, buildings+ phase 11, approXiamtely 13 acres, fa, approved for Aft ! larger industrial truild-0ngs, .true of which is in place at tffir, time. The Coonissj6n approved this project in IS86. In 1987, the Commission denied th,r, devt;' r's_ regUest tar a Master,-) Conditional Use pewit for 'the project, which Would have allowed certain conditional retail cnd serviere oriented uses in pj?.se 1 wfthout furtht=rr Commisl9on revlew, 'tire e:rd result of`this & ls3or+ is that individual CO,Jditiotral Use Pormits will continue wo be recAtired for conditfona'l uses. The current 'request would not Change tnic re c ,[r;. individuct Cor�dttionai'; Use Parmitt would still be ceded and conditional uses. However, tho range _ of uses wquld be broadened significant1t, per' exhibit ` A% fag -- fi. , . 111. DIRECTION REQUE- _i.;j: At th'e heart of this is4,ue is a c,0est� tan of a"�fre er or n `w "initra'. decision matte ir° i��i to ;r jte a clear distinction in Subarbs 2 ttr encourage rai' 1 service was valid, and if $o, *A Cher 'This approach is still valf� toda' There is no question, that the na %ionai and ,7ocai. etoso�ay is undergoing $ignifica�•� changes with mart~ i� hasis •.'on, .ser °vice- orien•�esi activities: Howcyer, staff woul& tt rel'uc'tant to reCOMmend that rail service in Phis area be urAten off, V�hfch would be 'a likely resulf'bf opening'' up_, tho entire subarea to a Wde vari:Kty of serviO� oriented user.-s. _ ii . 1 Pl AllNiNE �C MME ctt ! STAFF REPORT-, AMENiDMENt TO iUBAREA;kOF -ISP' _ Febeua -y 24, 1,99a Page 3 Staff al Messenger I1 vestment Company are seekfng//. ftitial direetitn� ram °tea C �.fssion4 Tlie options aye; „ 1, Instruct + ;off to initiate amendments to Subarea 2r, r.�tth, they intenti% of b.`oadening _ permitted ,W/ conditicinal7y poj, fitted uses,, for consi*ration b " the Co issi�pn in the nkar, future. ladicater ?tjj the developer that, based on existing infdrawtfiori, the _ C3wission does not see the wed >� ?or City-Initi tea chapges.. I' . this eve/ the f de,jaloper woul , be fre '� to °Pile a formal a! ndMent application for future "`Commission review ifche so deslredy( o ° 0 � As an alternat t,, commission ��,ou10, direct staff to cansiyler mgdificatiahs to the boundaries 4f subareas ; and 3 to allon�,the broader range Of uses ilong Arrow R'iheay frontage out encouraging non -r4iil -related uses in the �tainde,� of Suboreal, wi' Res 'ally submit*=4 = o' u Brad u� �e City P7bcner 1i \N\ , Bt*cOKcte Attachments: Exhibit `'A °,- Lettor Fran M C With Attachme4t 4 (Pages A -1 th''opgh; A-8) Exhibit ' "9" - Subare-as'l; 2,�and Exhibit 'C" - Arrow Swiness Park° 0 � a , \1 MiSSENOERINd ESf+1 ENT COMPANY jjANO DEZT�'RP•D February 2, 198A 1 i Members Of the Planning O'cl ission CITY OF RANCHO cU �I' ON;,A � 20 "CM Baseline Road Rane,,s Cucamonga, Cpl 917.30 Reference: Fropo3Ed.Amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Specific plan Ladies and Gentlemen; We hereby request your coraide�ation and subsQquon� ',approval of an amendment; to the -, city1v I'XnA,�.X zial Specific \ \Slang �� simple statement o tho inter Of the reggested:' aaq`*t ds lt, AWL Prior to the vcrbilge that would uxidoubtably be rsq��il ed. :by the actual dorumont, could be: - An amendment to the Industrial Specific Flan as pp� to Subarea 2, to silow additional usas as depigied ron Exhibit 1 (attao,*t%j) to tha jsxist.ing parmitia or conditionally POr,Attod uses, respeotivcly Subarea 2. , with,',.' It is intended; that this latter serve as written I Atificahion i for the amendment and that the and fi,adingo as presented will allow you to act U7 n ab3l► cah this request: Sui+arcU 2 of t<`ao Induatritzj Specific Flan is apprcxitaately 1S5 acres physically defined by Arrow R+sute to the !.,Orth, Hallman to the east, Sth S'.eet to the south. and uintiyard to the vast. The subarea is sut�vundsd by rasidential 4nd sit the worth resident. s y perk uses:* r " :,l and . ubarea :3 of thE;,,TSP to the south, ISF Subarea 1 tO �e U6P-R and IS.? Sub a� 3 tc the east. Subarea 2 is bisected' Fuji the middle" by a -1'ead :_track ` of the AT &SF iailw�ay. Three separate spur tracks eubse�uentl emanate to .various, parcels from this track, - ^see 'exhibit 2j ; F'acilit;i4it ; thin the subarea r icr from i1ii Otis', Elevator Building coti.�tructed soma 26 ysrztrs agte to t�'R recently completed Arrow Business .Park. Several other new projecta are "t currently in the Design/Revi4jw process. r 16912.q 4cr Karmtz- A.e e rr,,y�. CA 9211,; 71.,474-1300 ' n f p } Vebruary 2, 19es k 'sgc Two The primary Z=ctio_n of Subarea x, as dsfin*d within the Industrial specific: Plan dc€-q? t, La to "strengthen its m:>hufa5turing and warelaoua:n� fitiss, comp, smonted by rail selcvias (exhibit 3), The 1.,� o-f,x�i' continues to state city Policy which is Rtc ancdurage -ths 4gvelop"nt of ;;ail qsrvice facil3ti.as, one parcels with rail dc�valopment potential« and furtha�^ „to �alr rail servica� devolopmentt of all Parcels t911lh adjoin existing or - proposed lead /spur rail line &..x TAe ;tuthorA of the ti ust -.Ul SPOCIfir., Plan in 1950 -81 aftsreA tQ'this policy wbe2X- ,addressit1 the, permitted and conditionally permitted l3se9, allotrabl,e with'n the subarea. Subarea 2 pons�`�s*s the ' number (by acival Count) ' of dafins -d uses (bTNI, p±armittod and /or conditionally permitted) of an,� of the ISP pusrtareas. 3ecause of this fact; in order to meet the stated i,Fal to strangthen the MnUfactusing and warehousing activit; '181 a n coraditioral, Use permit is required for medium induatria �. As `,an example., co1g. #ring this svyarea to Subar*4 11 we find, that Subarea it hm::�, a goal ai�►3lar to Subarea �e including V %i5 servo, *k4;ept that Subarea 11 also sezves an a transition` ,from the' industrial park and general industrial uses, Subarea 11 allows msdiwm "'tndustrial as a permitted use and aiso a? lot +: savel:al "omBer »ia2,/affice uses ; is Permitted or conditionally permitted, useW , 3exiziait lj . Subarea ll borders sithsr g6neral industrial oa* mask& trial pat V_ uses on all aides. This; contrasts tf;tL ..r %aroa 2 whin,; ' Berl res as �a transition with assidentialj�- l:,,raat {.en uses'- a4d gsn�iraa ndustrLr,3 uses, However, Subarea 2 'ises are restricted on both time :r� d;ux industrial .manes at, onn enrt of the spectrum and at' off'(, ,�coumerci4l ussFA at the ot�r et end of the spectrum, :.l of which Are allowed in S`35aiei. F . It is logical that the neidiui'. industrZal uses are conditianall -, permitted in '9ubarat 2 heca �. of rhs: sever *17 al tf3 mrs, howeivet, the Office /comt+asrcial ut;e � are severely : x, itsd'; (when t :ey would provide a logical rftrans,itatii ,Use,' idjar.ent,, to the residential areas), apparently b�scaur�s of tho z�sil sere rscp � r�tertr. An e�.tremely , �imitccd numbs r and ty'08 of users`, t:X, Ke �Qre qualify to exise . "(' a Subarea 2. the uPLO stun that! Subarea 2 parssesses �' -. devslo mane n \ ' ah F potential Is in error. ltaii s�trves< ;:�v today are generally very large in nits+ re. \ -40 advantages of using rail -jervi�u can only` ve ra ti transport oY rt w quantity or freight. The axis�,; size -.ad its3:ei - w tcpograptiwt nature , of the But pracluc `,, tho ahi ty o build a stra: zt a conducive Y. �4E5SENGER INVIS',10 t fQAt SiRiY economic od in the ng parcel sren both '%0 'modern }7Q -'o2 2 -4- PCaenda A of 4 i --- - , CITY OF RANCHO CUC'AMQ-%TrA r tt Februaiy 2, 1986 Page Three day rail usage. Rail aseraxice w$l7 always n(aed+sd ands in pact, eertatn 4reasicar Subarea.& are physically a e to handle rail sservec� structures (i.e. they are relatively flat). Tire , , Point is, firm stet ®want that thi:, -` subaarea ; s conducive to 8trona ral" service development potential6' is nog; Corr ®c . Seaver &i thousafnd aasear on the- east side of the city are m;aacde up of relat�.vely large, flat, rail oerved para*is. That axed t=ly possesses "Btrmng rail sore* potential". In 1960, Otis Elevator Cc0Pany purchased 36 acres on the southeast corner of vAncyard and Arrow, Their Waist. Coast Manufacturing plant was constructed on ' this ', site.,,- The structure exists today and has pans ed over to naveral" owners a.ne - /or usQs. Otis Elevator required- rail service, and a combination of private (Otis) and utility (Sarnta Fe failroad) efforts brought a. lead spur northerly from the main line that egoists mean 8th Street. This was the anlY industrial use (rail served or othaxwise) to exist in what hat since bsen designated az subaroa S. Sasvirail other fixrts OVWA* the yaws have taken advantage of the lead track and pullet aj; urs into their parcels, Most of those fins ,!,have; for = a v riaty of Ask reasons, left this area. In fact, ,si=a 1954, rail norvi- a to AM user in- Subarea 2, has been avenfiging I SLz. auawkarl y'his is a figure proTided key bath the r `4,1�" LY;: and umers within the s'ubarea� Our country has evolves! from '* zanufracturiw_,,'.proctictinn oriented natyan to za vast ®entice oriented "cisty. This xaa occurred sine& vhs sea- called baby bootie beginnings and continues today. Ohio fat°t iS -repeated over and ovar in the media and in text books. This is neither good nor bred in the overall e+coiaomic picture 1.sAut, :it; :is fact. Rail service is a d2tinite parallel to this trend as statistics show a contin .�l 3rsap in rail n rVice need s almost every year.- The above stated fah tcs are offerQ4 in An effo4t to amRand,'t<he spe,;ific. uses as do,2ined in Subarea 2. The raxcomzonded changes ap amore s closelga agree E7ith the 'changing. needs of our society and, -more 14portfAntlY the needs of the neighboring uses. The table of users aS 0hCwn on Exhibit 2 M -0 a y Adds uses presently ellovad or ccrt,ditie:nal?.y al"►:tiwed in Subareas, and 3 whirzh have similar residential bord rs. No attemist made to add '_ Sol suPsasc$as e users permitted i^ thoS4,Rdjoirinq t ,,4 Solely i s t4 - reetove the unfair burden p],acad on this Subarea 3iX91y because it is rail served anet Permit logical, A;4arn day user, as ctTa;;rdtl�aitted oii Abh r either side of it. y pe# ,;, y A4r:55Edd�ERtN�f��TldfNr Coli9fil►RP!" �� - 'f r, ," CITT 00 1 imC cuCAMONaPa February 2 1p#e ti Page Four r' ParecYi.� cuaUx anea in conu-idiireed by many to be a '�a " couaeunmen his cr�nvicloon in ,shared, by , those in �1 av:�"�r�� +I YfIDIt#Ei$� 63 � r :�'"� 14ical ?c'�a��.ilciilts, ti: v*lo�erz and' n t general, any on -tAty asked tc -� r2X8. Judgement. There are, 'Ot courses, th at cc,Jt ribvsta to this weloomed lab 1. MOM 1%" it), the abillty, t* idOAti4'jI' needs and }1seas of the i,,cu amun;Lty and *4 qurage their i lsemsntatiQn, �✓arzay °disst a +rts are a priers �'xAZPIe of U40ting a changing comamunityim needs. in that light, it �� kaapssd 14hat the plannie'q cemmig*1on recognize V� need. for this suns .�mant a d suP'Port, its ne t OteP, towards iVipltmentation. . !' Scott Rio der Will , be „ ' s '" pd sl�iblet for : communication t Pre4+ont:ation end .- .4jscnssions regarding this natter fro* thj, gairk :torward. it you veiAStiGI$9, plesaaa rA$t7C your phOnG calls to his dizeft hav e any c� 1 r�. v ry" yours, ."�.SSEPT �E TFt , s VT' CO"ANY �<< € e' Cordon, x cut &.V* Vic* President' 1� S �ocstt ,_ . pac�tte� � ' ` ' Pro act � Iranagear AAL L` 1 •} ~� - r MES ;EWc�,'tINVEVAt�t'�r�lyMPAN 0 TABEE 111 -1 .SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA ® PERMITTED USE # CONUITIONALLY PERMITTED U; E NOTE. Non - marked -Wes Not Permitted AMEM USE TYAi4Rw Land Use, qt Ga GI P,�OPO •. Gt R .. Subareas 4 ;! fJSES f 3 MANUFACTURING - • * 113*14dastrial Park CI- General industrial MI/HI- Mislimum IMPailt.';le+dvy Ind us�'I' HO -Haven Ave. Overlay district ' HI -Heavy indu6trial ,,� i , 7` ir' RA Custom a a 0 0 m m o e e • • 0 0 s s � + + ' "CE PROFESSIONAL DESIGN & RE9�ARC .siintatr$tive & Professional /Oaeign Services + M + + + + M + e -r 0 0 s s _ e Ppiblic Storage p p Ag"w'lurai/Surairy ftuppliwi 111 Animal Care { {. + + e e e Q e e� e + + • • a� �` e e #. . .} �, e 0- e a a � ® • • a e e a i i e a a ,� + + $ $ . e a a p p ,�. + + .1. , g + + " CIVIC ilr2:^ilnist•ativs Cleric Ssrvictls %;uitura! - - e e e e e 0 `- $ 0 ` "'- i + - • * 113*14dastrial Park CI- General industrial MI/HI- Mislimum IMPailt.';le+dvy Ind us�'I' HO -Haven Ave. Overlay district ' HI -Heavy indu6trial ,,� i , 7` ir' 0 3 CIRCULATION ATION TRAILSfRENiTE�' "` 12W R.O.W. 0000 P6 4ietrim aowes"Gma Creeks & Channels 100' R.OX, $000 Bicycle ` ae..e..r aw or Is!ia R.O.W. Sl � Rwgional " 'Parki muft "so c RAIL, SERVICE -f-s- �}--#- Existing ��1 ~'a'�''4iu Spa49s1 S4reatscapei Access RCinti U 41W 600', t 'The elks shoWn May not be WwW nwnac nor is the kallon stip sIF>:.Tits datkatt�tt s3 site is an None: parcel 14�et and lot cmntilra >`ana� ` are �It0M eO A,��'Qgir iakion only. Adkwgm of a ptojW#d Man need that may he ,. IV-22 3�1[ui;t ;d a+rer tKnts as the City develops. BXHIBIT 3 SUBAREA 2 a -. a Use Designatian WOO fndustriai Priteary Funeti,o The long�nrnga play f r this xubarea is itr+enBther its wnnOfac wring lrid.. taaretoc+usi g aGkiv ties,, comPl- entqd by rail' acres ; pq tf+brrs -of this Subarea have lead /spur r 1 prcpovd to aGG*Qdate Rail Service ne a 3� Q� ,iii :trial ?4bas. o It 0 .the' City's pal iry !! otrraga the - 'deialunt of .. pia ice ce i faail itias an partials wf tit = tron! developtaent potenti,�i. tandards _.ha+re _t een ,established, as a -par<t of t t, 3pecifiG'Plaa `t art pl�gII, Swactfin/�IVA I N Tch rFeef�Uf. re the 'the /Raiil r Ge +R lesl'pp�ent Cf, 4.1 ,parse:x Oich tdjoi�n exiis ng or prOoosad leidtskr rail lines. ' This subarea #3 bond 4 can the north by. Ar� Route, cut the +TkA"� R'ellPan Avenue, on i e south by Oth St ;.and on the west by Yiney rd i Avenue. W t 1S5 acros in the oubav a; I ap itiametely Gil acres. are r►ccupfaad ky exist ' g indu trial uses, awast of frith uaq,$� terved " y rtil. Partin tted UsGS— — Custom Marufactpring LTO "m mturing �� Re�arctf�r+vices . LiOt lWasale, Storage and Oistributicn Nedi(m ftle$aie, - Storage and QisVibution AgrkulturWRurSekr,+ Supplies and Services Eat *ng atttdtr^inkiisg. fstatl #s+ents Repair Services Florid ControVOtility Corridor Conditional' uses Fftdsaart t tnufactur ng Public Stor yg9�� Auto* tint /"fight vuck Repair Minor =- k0tomotive/'fruck Repair moor j wilding Contractor's Office R Yards Building/Light Equi nt Supplies and Sales business Support Sery ces Convenience Sales and Service's Food -and Saxerap sal e!c Heavy EQuipeent Sales and ILIntals f Recreation Facilities Public Safety and Ut31fiy 5ervies sY�SS _ �'� A ' n-l--- !®� liYV'f M�ir'Ii6lM YIRIgAiI � - eE i n j l• r � i i i !-1 I ", 1 CITY OF RANCH6 CUCAMONGA STAFF RED �q If BATE: February 24; 1988 � � 1977 �> TO: Chairman cni Meyers of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller Planner City � I BY° Oa P.1 n a ema1; Senior Planner SUBJECT: TRAILS C TTTEt AAMIUISTWIVE REGULATIONS 'I Y. ABSTRACT' Tdia r Wrt..i5 in response to direction fray; the l<"�iss" on for stay -to prepare a:,statement of the purpose, .duties and direction of thit Trails Advisory emmittee. - II. BACXC,ROUNB: In 1901. following the adoption of the General Plan ' ra s e !.it, thel,Planning Commission appointed a subcorpaitteeita adVi <,e the^_ Caaaais ;ion on trail matters, The Commission also 'adopted adpAthistra �ve regulations to govern the Committee, These regulations estab shed manbership wind reeponsibil44ties,; and general rules of oraler. Staff has draftedj,. a Resolution modifying these{' adrfnis'Lrative regulations for y1ur consideration tonight. The reasons for vpdwting the<,e regulations are: 1. The City Counr�il xoted in 1987 to no innger appoint 3 Council r presg0tati_y_to the Committee, and 2. The name Of tIM�' /cowit ee has changed f,*On Equestrian Advisory Committee to Trails Advisory Committee "to reflect the breader scope of trail issues, and 3. The terms'�of dppointment to the Committee i+ =_ve not been followed, and 4. The park and Rccreation Commission was created which alib Involves trail _issues thPdugh park sites, and 5. The meeting t,- s of the Committee have changed from those adopted in 1981, The attached Resolution is self- explanator_% III. RECOMMERIDATION• Staff recommends that the - Pianni'ng Corm+ti3'Won a op ' e attached, Resolution estW ishing, new administratyve regulattons for the, Trails Advisory Committee. r ITEM S t , El f RESOLUTION NO. �1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MODIFYING THE ADMINISTRATIVE RMULATIONS OF THE TRAILS ADVISORY COWITTEE WHEREAS, toe City's General Plan establishes an extensive network of hiking, hiking and horse riding trails as a recreational - element, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appointed a working subp committee to advise then on trail issues, And f WEREAS, -the Planning Commission finds it desirable to modify the regulations governing this sub - committee. NOW, THEREFL.)RE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby adopt the following administrat?ye regulations fnr the Trails Advisory Committee* SECTION is PURPOSES 1 M. *4'purpose of the Trails Advisory Committee (TX) shall be to assist the Planning Commission in implementing the trails system as envisionedi,by the City's General Plan, Therefore, the Trail- Advisory Cuittee shall have the following duties, respont,ibilities, and functions: I. To "view and make recommendations to the_ Plani� Commission with regard to trail locations and-��.� appitcatbgn of trail. &sign standard for development proposaf�, (i.o. tentative amps, specific plans,, parks) within the City and sphere of inAuence, including, but not limited to the equestrian OVtrlay District. 2. To review and *ace recommendations to the Commission regarding trail design standards. S. To assess the present an&' future need for trails and recommend to the Planning Commission plans and priorities for the deve74pment of trails and. related facilities. SECTION R. COMPOSITION M' AppOImmIT The Trails Advisory Committee shallzoonsist of six' (5) members", One shall be the City Planner or his designee. Two shall be members of the Planning Commission =appoi�ted by the Chairmen of the PlanpMq Commission, Two shall be members of the Park and Recr;�� Commission. One shall be a member -at -large appointed by -the Chaibo#n of the 'Planning Commission with recommendation from the Park a / Recreatiol Commission Chairman. 1 PLANNIWG COWIISSIONERESOLUTION ;�. �. A r TRAILS COMMITTEE REGULATIONS _ page Z SECTION 3. TERNS OF APPOINTM iiT All terms shall lie twi y�fot��•" twelve months;japart taw main Coaraittft wAy be rMoveit at an O, (�a�i iaonths and shall -be stagge,hed 0n :Continuity. Ary member of the timo by the appointing body. SECTIO� APPOINT.NT;OP CHA RMAN Th a _ Chairmaps of tke ;ails A&fsory CCftitwee shall be the City Planner or deSignatlid repr�sentadtitne, ,I z SECTIOF - - -STAFF _ Repre4;�nirtion at T�aill� but not 09 limited toil Advisory ,Comaitttee fteongs shall include, representatives of the Riannini,- Division, -^ Engineering Division, Builoingi A Safety iivision and Comaatnity Services DepawtMent. The,' Tinning. Division sh t halve primary responsibility for agenda p pad ^a ion and generai.a inistratio�i f the Trails Advisory Committee. { SECT. --.iON 6• MEETINGS AND ROLES O'o A. Meetings -the Trails Advisory Goaapittte shall mees oCe at;vonth , E or on special occasion as needed. The TAC shall a tablis`i the time and place of such meatIng. wane Chairman shall distribute 1 I an agenda for TAC meeting Required for meettngc. , At least `three day;, notice is B. Quorum . A quorum shall be three me*iers present. SECTION 7,. PROCEDUV,5 1 A. The appl& cant eaA 1 'jubmit the appropriate applfcatibn and plans to the Cod - ,_arty pevelooMint DepartmOnt. Once accepted as ee plete, ttk planning 'Diva,ion shall schedule the application ter the V,!st available Trails Adviyoraf Cowittee meeting, The Chairman 'shall di'stributt an;t least plans let a week urior to the meeting. B. The Trails Advisory Committee shall, meet to review and discuss, the proposed project. {ifhe Chairman shall '.farward the recommendations of the Cowdttee to the Planning mission. Such recommendation way be cbnsolidated as conditiiins for final g approval. The Chairman of the Committee shall give written notice= to,the applicant of sirch recomendations. C. If, after review by the IAC, the;, Cc4mittee feel s'�that, the project needs substantial r, ision, the project review by., the TAC afiay be continued by the AC to enable t.;e applicant to make revisions. The applicant r notice of such decision. �ritten Y PLANNING COMMISSI RESW UTYpN TRAILS CftTr*fE RRt ULATIONS 1 Page gak w APAROM AW AMPTERCIH S ;4'IFj DAY OF FEORUARY, If r8, PE.Afiiaii#O OMISSION OF THE PITY OF ?VXCHO BY: arry s WRIM, CUMn I, Brad Butler, Depty Secretary at the Plannt"OA Ca mission or"'the City of Rancho CUCOonga , d# hereby certify that the fht e+ ing Resat utiai� `yeas �tiy and regularly intrr�c ce , pissed, a�td meted by th� Planning Ca*afxs,O jj of the City of Rancher Cucamorlae, at a rear math of, the planning fiomission hold on the � h_ -4o,y of I~ebr�usry, 19,88, 55y the following �otarta�avit; AYES: COt3ISSiQ'RS: NOES: CAMliSbllN�RS. r � r ABSENT: CtiWSSIONERS: i7 r; Ci � a U A ha c LILY QF' RAl Itwnv "WUVJVXNWk- DATE: February 24, 1988 (0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cowtss -ton FROM: Brad Buller, fty ?lanner r BY: Raney Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: USE DETERMINATION 88»01 - PLAXICO0- A request to e�.� a e propose use,�acturing of"plastiq battles, be classified as light manufacturing. I. ABSTRACT: The appltcant ?s requesting that« -the Planning Comm #ssion c ass y the manu €a tr'u'ing of plastic bottles as light' manufacturing and Ught wholesale, storage and warehousing. II. ANALYSIS: A. Proposed Business: Plaxicon, the applicant, isvproposina to lease an unoccupied 150,080 square foot warehousing/ Manufactering, building loc4tcd at 105 60 Acaci# Street (see Exhibit W) . The proposed business is the manufacturing of plastic battles not exceeding a size of 1 glllon. The manufacturing process involves the use of purchased, "resins. being heated, liquified, and stretched blow moldirtg,. - No chemicals or hazardous materials will be used or produced as a by- product. ` All defective plastic bottles, are re",y able by being shredded for reuse as resins. Packaging of the battles is done around the manufacturing equipment as the ;product gees out. According to Mr. Vic gricco, of 31,aKicon, the manufacturing area would only take up 10 to 13 ieryen} 9,f the floor area. The remainder of the area it used for waveh6s €ng. B. Nature of operation: The operation of this busi'ne4;s includes ra rabic '#or'�s delivery of resin material. It would include small truck and nevi -truck traffic for the shippiztig of finished products to customers.: The manufacturing activity in conducted ?4 hours a day. They have currently 80 employees and project up to 100 in the futuw: -. ' According to Mr. Vic Cricco, the manufacturing process would ��,aquire the installation of two silos approximately 30 feet high, and ether ground mounted equipment such as a water cooler and: eompress^r, Based an a site visitation, this equipment does generate some exterior- noise of a lour humming. Attached for your, reference is a summary of the business operation from Plaxicon"and a letter J from Mr. Walt Chenoweth of Coldwell Banker representing Plaxicon. `l (J ;1 ITEM T . PLAa NIMG COWIS+DFOF ST+ ,iiEPQR Use Determination 80.01 � PIaxiCon �:. ISP Re u ions.- The,l�nd use typo definitions for tight ane ME "� "Wholesale, a��u asturiny and Light Storage, ' a , C. Distribution af*` attach$$ for Y0Qr information. Medi ?ianufact!tri3g specifically refers to "plastic products ° fro�x ptsrahase ,k°uh per, pi as or resie as being an a' IZM- :. uses FII. RECOt iENONtIlili: >:DUe to a tier constraint, the applicant -m-eds to S now a ou some of., the Planning C issioWs detemina�tion at tli,e earliest possible t4 ; therfore, this item rvax addedJ, to ttie February 24, 1988 eting. Staff is still in fire process oI analyzing the.*aterials and, fnfov�tion submitted and will be,,aale to wke an oral report on, our findings at the - r�bPuary'24, 1988 t meeting. ;Staff has also visited the 'existing pi4xi+ccn plant in;.the ' City of, Industry to. to the proposed use first hand, ' ,Staff recoi nds that the Plair:ing COWssfbn revfewo heo attached materials and following staff's p resentation at the February 24; 1188 meeting dieterai'ne tie category of the proposed use. Resp4etfully submitted, Brad oiler City Pianr er < 88zhF.te Atta cements: Exhibit *9 - Locaiion Map Nate of Operation for ialaxicon Letter from,Mr.. Chenimth, Leasing Brokerage Letter fr:Sierra Pacific, Property ``lwner Deffnitian of Light,& rpdium Manufact ing Defin'tion,of Liq1-;': *,tedium h"holesa"6e', Stora a5& Dist 'ribution •t�"lr J 0 � J V Fir z i Neighboring Crrniaxnies Inriude. General Dynamics Target Stores Warehouse _ Frito Lay K -Mart Warehouse ChryslerMotors Mervyn's Warehouse Toltai Nonistroms Warehouse CocaCola WiMton Tire eo Giorgio PIOIImports a 61ack & Decker Whirlpool I' /z miles from Onrarlo' International Airport - mile from New Ii;IGdn Motel 1 -2 miles from three lnalor fri:eways: San Bernardino (101, Devore (IS), and Pomona (60) t ..... , SIFPuRAPACIFIC FUND I & it 3w YNNM1'.ru td 'RS -4P 6•Pqjt ?'�<#t r� C ♦'M: A � F P,' Mtl,MFG' . 1 uC • t •.,, t �.jy1r)� 1 K — .• y- ,� ! +' HIGH QUALITY MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY : „ 'Alt �,�.•••, � ty ,4 ■ 26 ceiling Clear height s 60'X 64' column spacing a Large capacity sprinkler system .60/3000 square feet n 'Truck loading doors ( I819' X 10' Dock high (2, 20' X 14' - interior dock I , 20'X 14 - Grade level 2# 12'X 10'- Ramp 1 SAS BUMAADISO M MI , •C 1 l ants a rat sewl�e -. (7) 10'X 10' doors. rzcencr r ?-:tr serving r the 20'X 14' door a Site area 7.'e acres _ rfv,M� ■ 207 total parking spaces w 277 480 volt. 3 phase power - .... 2500 amp capacity ' t a up to 16.000 square feet ,-.)f l mezzanined offi{ es ' %,1MR4PACIFIC FUND r & It r Terry Etiv ns Dana tongs Graham Tingier Wait thenoweth t i81Si 81U•G4t �s "{M) 810.6405 (818}8i{3.G449 (818)'$10.6413 0 The following information has been assembled in order to provide those in concern a general understanditag oi; Plaxicon Company and its normal mode of operation. In ad dition, this information is generated for the purpose of ootaining a use permit For a ?articular structure located at 10660 Acacia St., Ranci:O Cucamonga:; 1.. Rail, Traffic - Depending o,a customer requirements, sail traffic, for resin Celivery on1;v, would dict-Ite three to five railcarg; per month. 2. Truck Traffic - Pick -up and delivery traffic Would Azc;txnt to approximstely 2S trucks per day ranging from small delivery truciss to w} actor `trailer com- binations. Keep in mind maximum load weight for our product would be 1Q,000 lbs. per truck. 3. ahe product and materials used to manufidt,.:urej}our product are all F.D.A. proved. Regarding noise,odor and vibration; A? Noise - i" rle exterior of building. Interior meats o.S.k.A. require - meats of '90 db or less, it` 8) Cdor, - None= C) Vibration. - None. 1 4. Hours riceoneravion - z'; F; ar4ary l0, 19Ii# CCWAMtA PMe$TATESERYICES 'TV0 CASTLET04 STREET. SUITE 100 . CITY OF IN004TRY. CAUFCEN iA W4&l ft f Mr. Brad Buller, City Planner . { City of Rancho cutamo6;sa { F.O, Box T? Rancho a , o4mongn, cai1forAim 411730 � Rlr; Use l9eternsinr:tion for Plaxil an 10660 f Acacia .15tr4 et { Dear Brad f On - kchalf Of FIaxicmtt and ac the building owners* (Sierra Pacific FArtn, representativ w ers) es I Only $IlCG t0 request.a t.TSe Aetermination from the City ' Planning t„ ommission.ii / — 4 P1aXicOn is inLN- rested In OccuPYing the abtSve- Tafiirenced buiidi' in ff ag the city of Ranctio CucamonV> currently loeated within Sub -rrea 6. We lire asking that we be classed undeeli light manufacturing use as defined by the Land Use Typa def$nitio`As withl0 Table II:I(2) of the City Industrial Specific Plan. Plaxicon is in the business of Plastic stretch blow molding of smai.1, clear food containers Of the 150 *03",squ9r. feet of building, the actual manufacturing area Wg4ld take up only 15,000 to 20,Q00 square feet (10% to 13%). The product which is produced is in its finished form and is ready For use by the general pu€ %,,jc, The product is directed triivards the wholesale market (see enclosed prtlduct brochure). Plaxicon will employ 75 to go p:opie at start-up, with futuraa � mployraent reaching 100, The business is'labor intensive. The producdcn process f3 extresnely clean, effici m and non - hazardous. The manufacturi49 activities do not produce any odors, vibrations, hazardous wa a materials or particulates ..which would adversely affect other uses on the sa site or in the general vir0nity. There is absolutely no noise ncticeable outside the facility and the noise level within the manufacturin$.area is approximately 70 decibels, with 'a maximum of 90 decibels directly ad a nt to one of the manufacturing machines. The- entire product Iine is Food and Drug Administration ()" D.A.) approv4;d and their existing plant is certific€i by the Interstate Milk Shippera Association which requires a very clean isnufacturing environment. u` I piaxi' ;-would be using the rail spurr behind the building on an infrequent basis wr`,ih approximately three to five rail cars per month, The existing rail spur is behind the buildingt and is not visible from any of the existing structures surrounding the facility. The tail spur was designed ta,be 'recessed blow grade level to help with screening of any rail cars which inay be nulled 040 the building. Plaxicon his track traffic of approximately 25 trucks per day, ran ;ing from antalLdelivery trucks to tractor�8raile�c combinations. or C, thos62;i picr -up or deUxe oPC :xtions to the £acalty in a single day perioti. i oply sbout five of the Yip ; xvould be with tractor - trailer combinations,_J The manufacturing equiproen 's ixtrewely M4)crt a;ad, to a certain extent, high -tcch, with each machine b "n; valued ',n excesr3 of $706,400.00. When Plaxiboa initially ocew,Pitrl this: iiity, they will have, approximately $7,000,000.00 of machinery an > ipaneat within the - building (tee a:uolosed photos). With the building be orth approximately $4.8 million, this total Value, should provide as2;exccl U!;€ tax Lase for the 'City of"Rincho C'ucaMq ;a As we renal the Use Definitioal Id seem to us that Plsxico ��uld fit within your light tpanufacturi speci>`it Lions. We feel tha this Cation is ti definitely a lighter manufacturin t�Me than some of the athepi'!t'ses hat have a been defined raithin the light Ma facturing area'« some of these heavier uss { within- tht light man�}facturing definition include st bottlinj plant, paperboard 1' container and box manufecturing anal mall €atrilated mctai products Plaxi,pon Peas chosen this location for its hightail and attractive appearance and would bops to be a future asset to tht !city Of Rancho Cucamonga;in this location. Piaxicoo has provided,,a� list of operational information which I have attached to this letter for your review and co "ideratian. T `bgsz ahould nfcd additional- information eort ;cr_ ling Nixicon -or wish 6.. tour their existing facility within the City of Ir!dustry, please crtact Mr, Vic.Cricco, Plant Manager, at (f M -961 -9377, Sincerely, Walt Chenowo& (818) 810.6413 cc: Mark Kenny, Si °rra Paci €fc i'artners Bernhard Wassink, P12xicon Jack Lamb, City of Rancho Cucamonga Enclosures wcBUL1.ER: 0 SlEf!f C:A L �� mac. 3 �,7,jr a , February 12, 1980 Mr. Jack Lam Director of Community Dwelopmen Mr. Brad Buller «'1 City PIanning I City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Ranch tr Cucamonga, Chi .917.0-1 Subject:. Use Determinxtiori for I4axicon A# _10660 Acacia Street Gentlemen; G I was unable, due to illne" , to attend the ' meeting Tuesday, February 8, in which the use \`sf our buil.iing at 1 ;660 acacia by Plaxicon was discussed. As the" owner of the huildi #q,, I cartainl.y wanted to,be present. c As - Z __,am aure_, yasx,.._knosv., .this_ bull ding_wav _ .developed,._ in., a joint.--0-.1 'venture in 1983, as -a light inanufacturing- ldistributi.on_.:.buil•-diaq..4 "There i4-exe•4no-~probl+ems— curing the--°desl:gzi 'arid ar =pezm t' process wit respect-to this p bj ect. Clearly,' with the depot of the building; 'the -ra l`spur - Awhich -was approved at that t,#%e), and the 'parking, this project had manufa'c- Luring as well as :QCs stribution capabilities... At the- meetiz.Cr,- -Bev � 1. - issues -suers f xrr.: should . have been discussed. First, your (ohm -City of Rancho Cucamonga)- land use, type -definite s have been -amended xded zI cep aur...DrigjzaL d te -development pla .. . " Second, - our building 'is obviously a single tenant type *for distribu- tion uses. fact,�3 . recently had_.a sin,31e_ tenant user, l'�S x?_w. - -• Save, which 'was_approvid -by . the, City— ..Yet, t2re_ n�s�iw us<ydc�f�hi�i ons w speak tc; a mximum..50.,.000.ox, less, for, .thjs_use» Third, `our `sub area'•is - designated as - dasig,- -- nation in our . set of use ddfinitior;s, a-I,- - it -is - in most, cities, attempts to clarify light vs medium manufacturing %by asking a number of questions: Cont d. — tl February 12, 198's Mr. Jack Lam Mr. Brad Buller City of Rancho Cucamonga Page Two f G (1) Does this, une proce noise " , odors Uumes), vihrntions, > or pixrtl6ula�tas itu which would, adversely affect surrroundinc usersT (2) Does tl�is use prod»ca� frelqueat heavy truck (semi- tractor trsilox typeh or heavy rail use? The answers to a4 parts of both questions (1) and (2) io NO for Plaxicon. They art a clean, cjtxiot ma,nufacturingld stributior. company. Only 10 -13% of the Natal space will " be light manufacturing. With only $ (average)- tractor- traitor trips .a day, and only 3 to 5 rail � spur deliveries per. month, thile is a light manufac,turii.q uses. \ Because Pla:eicon, and the brokers felt this was art „acceptable use, they have very little time to make a final decision,- Our building 1 was their first choic:et, and it Plax� con is . forced to go elseewhere, both the City of Rancho Cuca�aanga and my firm will lose millions in future revenues. Further, they, are very interested in besco"ng _ -an owner of , their otm facility- at 4ome-• future point,-which would make them a permanent asset to-the,Cixy�:- Please give this_ matter -7ptom# attt+ehtidd. ''Your comment&' at : the. ineeEin have= a .� g' PP�eny ^causee! = Pla�ricctn'�tcr look eiser-re (asp S understand, _"was . suggested, to_ thews . "}ay . _Mr."�'Srad: ' azl L during the j meeting)--'. - Tf yau, :have any -que;stiozL,-ragar^ding- the .building, please call rie _ s:iractly. I look forward to a• mutually satisfactory solution. Ver� my you _ (( President gm- cc: Mr. Dennis Stout, Mayor, City of Rancho Cuc&Aonga Mr.. Michael Joyce t Esg.,- Allen, Matkins ri. -..., .. _ Mr. Walt Cheenoweth, Coldweell Banker- Mr. Bernard Wassink, Plaxicon Mr. Peter. Coulti.s,..Sierra .Pacific: 0 'Ci O C w � � w N vr. f: •1+ C ��i J. I V M O V r � 3 L r w4r Q r� �LUS Y Q kS O� A p C i% c ow aµ_ Y. q N. C Q p 's Wit . a?!lea� �+N 27L► a L Y wq W �..G O�.Y ��.� � W• C -ar6® i GNfj6 bL C' 4=- a s V d C±, C Gam^ L q G i�r �.� Yi• 41 on 4h Z Z 44 '6 +►� Y � O L q, S. N IRS g�9q LLLL� q.0 y+ .0. :E a O- O CW!i$41r r s ca0- idi�Tr� a9 y. cNI O'V NNRlY Y q w MpN„i+�y^"'jY L'�CNNL� q C "� � �Y� O 40 N y r ►� Z N ii q O'er L q in a+ as t�10 Y9gL4A Qa -V w.V.y1 c3 ie!. i ° COL .c cY N. Y r9S go 42 c Y. f N 0 Yd a 4• 49 0.4C �.. .- ,X— " c N as x o r e . QJ3�C 7r � �O r V :i •► t �Y g«C- p�iL b � .-3 . o °6 N c? a C ImwA.f Y LYa Y L _Y It N 1-- '0 O �QUq q V 15� dHWes. eQwYy.ONHt�1 6q/ 43 N �'� yj C'T L V y�Y. f�ey 44 to 4& �QN .0 ng d� 0 j$QO�. � a. 84 qT4 "L,q 0 go � Y A� L. yj •j O. L S. "N r qp„ VT C •r •0 Q N Q•H L ii Y C S.4-0 O Y = iJ 4 b . S> +�.. • uupp � R iQ. +A 04 V 44 44 2 ZI Q0 �Q,. ft U3 %. L CI W p q LS N 1PD aq .0 S N N Y Q ul L O V O.Gt -.�pb ��bofL •c��Y� O � roYQ {•+ ,O Y r •k +;'v aN+ 1G ;�''.,�•, a V vS� Y. � RI � .w. Y -, 0_ a R? Y EP O Q4. CY LQr" L+' O V �r Y 41 ' .4 q ui aui + u •. ,GW Wfl r . N q O = - 4+ 1- C il p Yq�L.L 'A $01 a' Q. -{ oTJ. q+On O L dYi� 1t Ni W. w+ O L W fE O!> N 1.2 j qY ��'O QO'VVh "C 0 0.- s :i c� 41 pqj f :too. SSW' h N IV y ,T ILY *, �, •+�,: , o 40 43 LZv ,o w 41 h v O ~0� 4110 'C�f C& 4 76 qi M1 .t►,pL�. II L N i k ,O .s r.1=ZMe a G: aEV"' a aN. d L V. Yak 4f R a Z 6 �C�? NE +' Mme"'