Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988/03/09 - Agenda Packet
i 07 1 -02. 3-9-88 P Agenda of 1 3 CITW; IN tsx: tl CR' - NESDAY 14� CR % 1986 7i4lti p m. ldORS 1-AIM CON1V W" cam am LiM R"CHO CUMA#Q)1dA, iwA1 RNU c9i`►t91k ' , If. ROU Cy¢B Comlrr*10AAr E! kosley Commialoner Emer ak I Commissicner Chides. _ Commianioner:;MoNieY Com misslomr;-Tblstoy FetsruM 24,1088 u V. Csa nt Cale"dor' - The following Omt M Chlgr4ar items) ran; .Ctp &ad to be routfn'6 and :., noii-ce trovemfaL .They will be acted on b55'b the Commiaaior6 atone time w thout dls=stom It an bne has rn over any item, it -� ��tt:Sk� " ; i�B'filtttt�id f01` tiS3Gtt�3ittn. r A. ' VR MTEI lOx FOR DRY LOPMZNT!�REVMPI 85-48 -TOWER e. velopmettt a s two4t t r a e e tei bs W totaltrg 21.,000 *tare_ feet wit..tin an sp ` "'�iveau integrates) bushAnn center fV Sinia ,) bi the General Crattz tterew Didriat located at the northwest quadri Bwothill Boulovoi i w+m Raven Avenue - AM 1077 - 861 -08. c B. TRACT 12643 DESIGN REVIEW - 1CAUFMAN AND BROAD - resew a alevat ons for a portion of m pmv ausly , approved treat reap wisMtg of 40 sole famf;j late °an 104 aerea pf land within tote Ceryn Plennet CoInmunity, lwattO t r tt of Highland Avenue on toes, 4tfit side) df ?Rochester Avenue - : t AP%,e 225--1,41, -6, 21, Atx 43 tmd 225`151,1, 8116 -17, µ v i I)4 Tice follow ~iitema 414 PlWblfe hoarfivi in ,Wck-, rerr��,edit, tvid a madr::voicei their +a tni n of thin relate€ proita t. `PiZ, w # to het` reca azsti IV the � �rdsir . the Cantu fWk, d,�, tv. Your atx -a t All aetch QpirtiCMMall be limitee� per ind84t"6* ecti4'h {pro ct. C. NODIVW0 LSNbI't ONS QP APPROVAL PflN ksA RCS% request a M o C i #`manna of UndergramdIrs of Woes *tow " Streapt 1( for the devetiwment of an Wustrw Perk and related Pared XXn ham# 8r v gacd en�e a d lit ;db�ee O i`it 200 - h 012 -11', 3+4, &. 21. (Contume►d bom.ltebrwy 24..1034) D. zBt °M} lRqN A AN M(l4 _�TBLPdI"I i�AitGjL+ Va o � � :A.wtsiG F � IZ- 1' ijstrj* ; oWuee.13, #e►d at bra Ja t coraaar of €tit set and Hnffa)WAvenue - z -2 1ti at2x 12 ow a, �1 2° 0N---I-- :. 7reai i tW su6dUv&kFn 3i r@Si ow i i n e Ill lotd10,a, IX aG4S! "i;° i�i11d In t#q Ie# idcatial wr ^t ` "i ilet�tiit t3 py¢t Aere); l 'atcd oorth,of 1o* St +t+ ;h east rf Vsr� Av , t tip northemAerminus of Drigae VIACt APHs 10142. ; +J IdTAL-ASSMSMBHT AND DEY'AMPURNT 1kI9VM W �3 o �� ate o -ant c�enc£er Of . c� mat m3iuis #ors heedih care facility aw `0,932. aqu�are feet of sxaedi sed dlfi so 10 acres of UM jL4 then Mixed iTso (MHO) `� ty, " c D3skr�t Wlth#.lq they terra Yista Planned Catnrttutsi located ai tt f theest COMM, at ia.aiiiketn Alenuo and 4;hur h Strut - APNv �{ �a2g� ?- rlrS�I.t•11t3,t,�i'�}. } _ tcsct�j��q�tth rt�ri r� lsr���y :� p+�r1r :,- t iil� i,�Ai�'4'efi'i�{i AL sa4"H7t1gs741EN ANr B ATI -,-x AR i.� E C, DUELO 1 acres of tY Und 3nta I pal's+& � itl�afia i�titiaci cr cbmmunityr lon-lited at "southeast "Mer of tmh Sentend DR iw!d *n Avenue AM 7 iSY i3, t4.: ?t#Iat €1711#: `R ail- # r ' VIL CW TIME"'exTENSIOX T _' R IS- INTATTY ACT X35 - CRL'1~�At�i? H. ` tttYB�gl t tTf I « ;� Std V on 40 151 l0' on ftpprQ;RlYfi6L '" 85 acres ,*f'UW InAhe fery Lox eAntlei Distriot (few than 2 E zlcaeiilr iu tffi far boaat8�' c #h* mt ante 0 `#anon Avequete troth of the Hillside Dr&it?ak� Chenod �, APINt 201 -121 94. (Conldnued f ti rsl rebruaty 24,1V40) Ix vM New , T� t4i�ErPtAL tF "I t: T3i3 1 8M SMN T';ti'+�t"xtl FOR ALTA L(,)MK AZA ` tea - � w�'��"" "" ra 00ndIUDU of Apprav l of nt are, lam' 1 roP i t>ij:�*W by-#e city Pii' mer to tie >uut x�lthita the Joliet 3Ecigza��'i ?t. Center iocattid at tote: ltuttte s �oiiwr of lath acrd _ tenon Street. " 1.'' _ �. M��'�w��SiViii•'� Si'.ri',.,,��`�... iE�1 'I'1isY.,,�:�11,��T�it?ldi'T'T tU T�Y �' �T��C� � "i4� T. MTbMUM UM SIZE �R � �� � i a t too u+3 #a rev �t� 3tr:'a�a regAttements or multi family dwellinp. 4J 4 - - Z+. +vOKiMUM&Y TRAIL P RC FFigr1[ tTT P8:OMV �I M. 1997 PESMN AWARD PTV)G -.IiM (OW Repo X" COMMIWAOU Thin is they tirho _'rnd place -for the pa> atxti p: Zis is rho *hRJ 1 COMMiMioa. stain$ td' Oo diswa *od here are thow which do rcpt utrecxiy app�srw tt�t txris agerdc. F, �, _ , ' no �P�l.(anting CGtt mia ton ifµ�tS'y �adK3�3 ,'tTd)fr�.�{yT�i- Ihfstmtfve .�.'aioyy x t?i1S "�tYt3rt set Il p.m. adjournment �R�e. If Items � that tmos tho$ Mall be board onbv,!Jth the owwont otiheCommtasiom o i k c, VICINITY MAP ",;: � Lao `� F R +ii ({iW�J 1 j 3 � �i tlY�ra_• V k �w iM 4 N_YilrRr, .. 4 / s J- Olt 6 L, W � K ii d� �ert�ifrk i"1 :1� `7' h. �vta� 'Piq 14FAV 'tE, >.. I afp6 s lot Ta _ik.renAa_r / . Vic Itt %P-A Lu t �►� M'' w 1nuNe�ie M • R , 'N� '� - -0 cm c thus +w>.. s • .. ®« r if M � _ �dA ■ yy A� �yrA �p yy i �k g��p{ CITY OF IV RANCHO ADUCAMON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF UEPORT �. DATC: Mail :h 91-:1186 ,. TO: Chairman 'Ind VAmbers of the planning Co"issnan 1977_ }; .FROW. Brad Buller, City P`ianner j� 8Y: Chris Wastman, Assistant Planner SUMT: THE EXTENSION FrA DEVELOPMENt REVMW 85-43 - TOWER PARTNERSHIP e ve y ;0 or `14 rs or y ce ra a u ng' totaling ; square feet within an approved integrated businas an er ivirginfa� ftre) in t*:c neroi Oo e^ Ia�1 Oistrf4flocated at the northwest o!adrant ei.TooUill Boulevard � and Haven avenue .Poi: 1077- 5141¢05. I» BACKGROUND: Bevel op nt ReviOt 85 -43 x43 originally approvod by the ann ng"r"Wssiort on Pabruary 12, 1966 for a two year per #4d. A, � condition Of that approval re' aced bask to the approval of the Ed�ards. � Cinema, DR 865 22. The condition str,ted that. should office building(s) be } proposed requiring more than 86,"f�' firg spaces, A detailed parking analysis would -be required to det� tr► if adequate parking abovo the 85 could be-provided fob operating and pr oposed uses. This project (DR $S_ 43) required 84 parking spaces calculated on 21,Qoq square r "-eet of building area. 'the project was approved .baq,�d' art'ially on its _ conformdnc� with Condition 3 of Resolution 8�1i? The applicant has submitted plans to the Buitdi�., and Safety Dfviston for plan check; ho�evor, will not he able to cs pleto tha process prior to the expiration data. xherefore, the applicant is requesting a are -year time extension. 11. MALYSIS: 'here have not been any chances to the ileveyopmeni Cb which woaat e, ect this pro4ect, therefore, the project is In conformance with j all current standards, I1,, RECOMMENpAT AN: Staff rec+ wends that the Fianning commisstin approve fE4e"°$T e""e'Kie sfnn for Development Review 8543 for one (1) year until J February 12, 1989, Re tful 4 mod► u Br e City P nner BS:CGi. Le Attachments:, Getter from Applicant Requesting -TIxe Extension Exhibit W . Site Ptah Exhibit 'IV a Elevations `Resolution No. 85 -112, Condition 3 Resolution No• 85-28 Resolutior, of Approval . %= ITEM R Building Department/ r i _ yandscepe Pans wit falso ha submitted wfthto' the next; 1g -14,, days z Thanks;;, for your notV ication )And patience. David Micheal 1/ Towter partner* t t r r 4'' 104 76 FOOTHILL BLM. SLATE 200 iRAN ffiG CLEF A#vSCtNCA, CA' t 130 (714) 989 6556 t Christi ''estxarx$ City of Nancho Cucuponga,, 5310 Baseline ad,, &te. {. Rrncha Cucaftongi, Ch 9 ,781 l ' Dear Chris, l This litter and check far, 06200 it to regc$�at ti$aa ert0n*tion fade DR 0$43; a foot ;l -story office building "t- thin th* 'V31410i* Dart Nivary Busiaeso C *Atre. ate antiCipkte pulling shortly rr 1 1 ire are icurr*ntlY In xggond submittal with "o f f f NOPI }2H CITY OF FLING DrMU , L i K *. r _under the axfrrent ;; s tired parking rgept, the �{ 60structlen of ff'ie- scrctcti =«�,Mri. _to th�ear insofar as the az r gflire more than '85 ParlcJng space ; s: i specifically approved byc a Modification,,.to the Conditional use -- _- i'erm?t for the site At %e tip^ arty such`10Mce structure is proposAd to be deveic*`ed, .the vplicant shall iUbMit &. detailed parking nnaivsis to dtermiiWz if there is adequate Parking f,)r a �'ev then operating and proposed uses.: This study shall be revierted by The pl#tnin4 issioa�« If a conflict exists betWe *A tht theater and other uses,. then the planning .. Commission shall consider a modification to the appli cable, on6ul to remaining office builldd ngs an amomou t�c$ +s rtat with the parki49 overlay, limit the hours of Operation of the cineata, or other appropriate ans of assuring `adequate Parking. This condition Shall. be, incorporateo in a document s ,approved by the City Attorney to be recorded tb provide ,!Eotice Of Condition to prospective Purchasers of the xu jec+ property prior to 'the is5ua4Ce Of a �bui ;ding peM1t far =`thk cinema. 4. A textured treatment shall be used in the pedestriah walkway underneath the arbor that rums throug%,,the sit , including across the parking tot., S. The ,arbcrs shall be planted with .vines, and creeping varieties of vines or ivy shall be utilized against Wall surfaces throughout the project re0oiscent of the original winery, 6. Adequate lighting shall be provided on all sites Gf building for the safety and security of theater pagans. i. Proper crowd control facilities and management shall be., provided for waiting lines to ensure that theater patrorts do` € not block access to adjsoe?t btiildingS or conflict with vshxCUlar circulation. Fr C 8. Grand opeif�ngs tend other special even "t3 sucn, as mvie premieres, shall require review and eppt'oval, of a T'emporaryE use Permit by the Planning division. 3. Trash enclosure /transformer location "-'shalt be, modified. to provide access to the satisfacti District. on of the Foothill Fire Enaineerinta filivision• r t. All pertinent conditions Of PM 8303 she 111 be adhered to, 2y A lot fine adjustment Shall be recorded to eliminate the lot "fle between the two P41'013` .:ontaining the theater prior to the issuance of buiidin4' #exiits. y Y I ; 4` FrB- ' A RESOLUTIOti OF THE WCHO CUO MO46A PLANNIK CO(ii7"N APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, -NO- 85 -43 FOR,_, AN OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED IN THE %ORT`Hl�ST QUADRANT 4F FOOTHILL BOULEVARO' AND HAV ff AVERUr IN VE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 21st day of fifovember, 19DS, a complete applicat ;on was filed by Christeson CoVany for review of the above - described project; and l WHEREAS, on the '8th dly of January, 1586, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning ComissiM held .a MeetiAg ts`considar the above - described - ,project dnd continued the mea February ng'to 1.2, 1986; and \i WHEREAS, on the 120 day of February, 19863 the Rancho Cuc&wnga Planning Cottmission held a merating to consider the above - described project. l NOW, THEREFORE, the Raccho Cacamcnga Plann*ct Coaraission resolved as foil .,S: , -, SECTION 1: That 'the following can be met; Te That the pt °oposed project~ -is consistent with th(A objectives of i_ilse General ftlan; and 2. ', Developmmt Code J objective the andrthewpur oses - of the disirict in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in coeglisnce with each of the applicable provisions Of the DeveloMoent Code; and 4.. Thnt'thr proposed use, togithor with the conditions appitcable thereto, will not be detrimental t-2 the public heslih, safety, or welfare, or materially, injurious to properties or Impmements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the envirormont an _at a Neagative Declaration was issued on June 8, 1983 fat-, the Piaster Plat?, CUP 83 -03. El SECTION 3• That Development Review No. 85 -43 is approved subject to the following cd tions end ittached Standard, Conditions: PLANNING NING DIVISiE3N % 1. ?ill pertinent conditions a`f CUP 83 -07* as contained: in Resolution 83- 79;71shall apply. o C 1 Resolution No. OR 85-43 - C'hristeson Company February 12, 198E —.- - Pa ? 2.. A texturized pedestrian connection shall be provided to the Bel Taca Restaurant to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. A texturized pedestrian walkway shalt be provided to connect tt- the northerly project -- the Deer Creek Shopping Center. The developers of both projects shall coordinate the to +tanon of this pedestrian walkway. Details shalt be included in the Landscape Plans to be submitted for Planning Division review and' approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. if a fence is to be built l' On the northern property boundary It shall be coordinated with this northerly developer and shall be of wrcught iron or Similar material. Details shall be included in the Landscape Plan to ba,submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building Permits. ` 5. The arbors shall be planted with vines. Further, creeping varieties of vines or ivy shall be planted against walled srarfacts throughout the project, reminiscent of the original winery. 5. Minimum 5- gallon size trees shall be provided In planters along east and north elevations to the satisfaction of the City Planner. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12Th DAY OF FERRWy, 1966. PLANK AVOWISSION OF TiiE CITY OFF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Br: s en s L. tout, a rmars ;! ATTEST; ra u er,' puty acretary ;J I. Brad Butler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cominissiort of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was -duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoptedd by the Planning Cor scion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning O.Mmission held AM on the 12th day of February, 1956, by the following vote- to -rWit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, Ci9ITIEA, tiCidEt, REMPEL, STOt1T NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COh1MI5S2t;`MERS: NONE llr.- _7 r BEiDLUTIOM N0. � Fi RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOMM PLANNINS COMMISUON, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95,43 FOR THE DEV OMUT 00 A TWO -54TikRY OFFICEJREML BUILD" TOTALING 21, �","' SQUAJ FELT WITHIN !!M APPRoVm ,INTMRATED BUSIA S5 CENTEk VIR6 NIA DARE? IN THE GENERAL COMERCIAL _ 1DISTR CT .1LOCATEO Al ;- NORTMEST QOADW OF - FOOTHILI ��OULEVAR�AND HAVEN AVENUE - APN 1077••661 -06 !I c1• 'WK-,SAS, I request has been filed for a time extension fo�- the above- described project, pursuant to 'Section 17 -02 -100. AREAS „a the Planning COWssion conditionally approved the above •,xscri ed project or,, February 12, 1986. U following-SECTION O The Rancho Cucamonga Planing C fission- has made the ra A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market clip4te for development of the �! project. „ B. That current economic, marketing, an4'�inv'e:!t4pry.�_ \\ conditions make it unreryaonable to deve/1p e project at this time. C. that strict enforceimnt of the conditions of!" regarding expirations would not be consistent with II the Intent of the Onvelopipent Code. f' 0. lliat tile granting of said time extension will not be detri� 07a ato the pudic health, Safety!, or welfare, or v� ia11y injurious to paropertiec or improvements in vicinity. i. SECTIOq 2: The Rancho tkucaaanga Planning Gomarission hereby grants a time extens of n-br; Project 1�I licant E %pi.ratiDH OR 85.43 Tower Partnership Feb�,"ary 12, 1989 l} Pi,#,RiXPP C "1SSION RESOLUTION W. M-ALOPNENT REVIEW 86 -.0) TOWER s4ar:h 9, Pao 2 IL, ",IRq)P ANA POOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF%will 1988. PLAT 114. COWEBSION of TK ifrr -W R HO cueAi OwU 8Y: arry mel,"i75 n j ATTG3 i s .. Ca' bid i I er°, miou7l R ary I, Brad,-3uiler, Vz -puty Secretary of the Planning Ca fission of the City of Rancho Cacamonga, do heroy certify that the for wing Resolution Was duly and regulaely introduced. PAsed, and adopted by the Planning• COMMission of the 3 Cikv of Ranch; CucaM 094 at a re I&r meeting of the Plarnin4l Comission, held on the 9th day of march, 1983, by the following vote -to -writ; I AWES: 4OKIISSIONERS: i i NOES: COWIWIONERSs { A85ENTZ COMMISSIONERS: 7 A �. ' 1r 'Cf q rte, jf '•1 --- --- -- -- - CITY OF ILANCHQ CUCAMONG , - W I� (J t3�i VC DATE: March 9, 4W 197 TO Chairvan and Members of the Planning omission fROhl: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TRXT 12643 DESIGN REVIE9 - KAUFMAN AND BROAD - Design r` eview of cu ding a eve on—$ er ,a IK =p on of a previously approved tract soap com,, rsting of 466 single family lots on 104 acres ..of,Umd within the Ca ryn Planned Community, located north ofAighland Avenue on the west side of Rochester avenue - APH: 225- 141 -8, 27, 411" 43 and 225 - 151 -3, 7, 10 -11 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval, o. building 'elevations and plot P ens. S. Surroundina Land Use and Zoning.., North - vacant an n e County sue•isdiction. South - Vacant land; Victoria PlanrA C unity. East - Vacant land within County jurist:,iction. West - single family residential, Caryn Planned Comunity, Phase 1. C. General Plan Designations: ra3e`ct --S E z E5 r�intiacl (2,4 dote'a Ar,0 units per acre). North -- Flood Control South - Low- Hediuoa Residential (4- 8`dwellino units per acre). East -- Loo': Residential (2.4 dwelling units per acre), West - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). It. ANALYSIS: A. Background: Do May 22, 1985, the Planning Comnoissloo approved en a ve"Tract 126443 with a subsecpent one-year ti%e extension approved ool May 27, 1987, This subdivision represents Phase It of the Carryn Planned Cm t+unity which was annexed Into the City In April, 1985. Tract 12643 is not yeat recorded, but is currently being rough graded, ` Phase I of the Planned C xnity (Tract 12642) consists of 472 lots and has nearly coeopl t t1 consto,4ction. t'TEM`R Mtkborou*i Developwent. Each developer is building one -half the 416 1otJ f<< fZ shown can Exhibit "A ". B. General:` The applicant Is proposing six (6) new- produci; types for portion of phase II 'of the Planned C"° attnity. 1, 3 ard: 4 will be used south of Vintage Drivo-:on lo ots that are I Pinimum 4,OOD s are feet. These units range in size from .1302 square feet to 524 ,srr feet featuring one siargle, story and two two -story products '40th three elevations each. Plans 2, 5 �\ and 6 will ba used north of Vintage Drive on? Sots that are MinfiRM 5,000 square feet. These units range it .�fze feox 1502 square "Yeet to 1424 square feet featuring also oiie sinete fitory and two -story units, The two st y units. have three car b garages. 1 ,w The render 'of Phase It will lie,, a"Ot eted ay }'srlbnraugi• Development = Exhibit "A "). They ka 'r bey utiili 1st °iht}r two' existing Ma�A saapl8zes to continue- horde - ijb*"; within the Planned Cowunity. Their unt! suss range ',.om 1G 5 square feet to 1671 square feet north of Vintage Dri46nd frow 1018 to 1478 square feet south 'of Vintage, Drive. C. Design Review Coai�,fttee• 'the Design Review Contittee (Chitiea, sr e , Rrou�3r",i' rx �° d the project or February,,49,. 1988 and recommended a.. val erect to the foil wing condi't:o;ss: 1. Trim ♦detail shall, be used ef; al siiyde or rear , ele"ations exposed flan viiw fa°a�r' -_a a;u,e l�� as ,�is dc► a throughout phase 1. 2. Provide windows on side of the garage orr ;.i4f unit, -. that have side garaga elevationz, exposed'ikt4, vie* ii frM a public street. 3. Natural stone should l)e.c►sed on thoseelevatfi�ns' featuring stone veneer r° Der th:,n the cultured. stone products. Applicant. submit alternatives „, . stone styles to the szt1afaction of the City' Ptah, r. the appl icani has agreed to use natur' ! stone with 'slight . modifications to the building elevations 4s show;? on _ \� ExhiWt "H ". Essentiall, ., the stone will be used as ... colwim ,details on Elevat�n C of etA unit.- r PLANNING COMMISSION STPF'F REWRT March, ,Page 2 i The entire Planned;CoMi0ity is being built by two developeri), . Kaufman and Broad, the applicant for ;ihis design revievf, lard PLAMIN�xql!rISSION STAFF REPORT Xt, T ,,W: OESlGM REVIEW " & ,arch; . se ,� __ _ - - — page i III. RECOMEM Staff r c?!w$ne that `k6e, Planning °Coamis� o► approve , f sign review 'Of';ract I9 "3 through adoption of the attached 40591Uian» RP.S ly 5 / Era r Y City Plna' Attachme(I .,. Exhibit MA* .- Caryn Phan 2 Cite Plan XI_ ' Exhibit "B" » 8uiia.ng Elevations - Plan �l Exhibit "C°I - Building Elevations =' PlAt? a E diibft " "`s Bur.4fro El�ationx - Plan S Exhibit "� Sustding-Elevaiions, Kam 4 �t ExMbiOF* - Building Elevation$t, man B !Exhibit "Sa „ Building Elevatiors - P'l 5 _ Exhibit "fi" modified -- Oevations 1 1� N'Off 1-H �.,.� , ■ ii,a k' r��i i11iRM tePk , ��e waL. 14 , Jill INS. t. , dtlast VA ws�eiy/r•e1YM .s a iteecx•��a � ';`ar.Y"MeF._'". � "`4%i;�t�. 1a#lrti'txakx x. .wr 11RiE %r1 yr, •. w!i it *t Y� #iWit.;, . "E7EfE# 1 °i r► !7 it *riaiJr'# f1411Hr�`ra Y• ek�a ar.#liJi ..;w `i ..+►r.d�.. "'2iR.t #tk sYtiit.trt Y�L!�^"^� :' �,.,._.. .*+"` ..:�....rc ,.r..o.�+.r , �, . :,#rr #dxtri «s i t�},.'• fir# �» t * #aRSe Wow :4 #awwrr %' x Y t 17 kil 1, RESOLUTION NO. ,11 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMIS -TON APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A PORTION, OF TRACT NO. 12645 FOR TVZ OEVELOPMENCT OF 283 SINGLE FAKLX HOKS WITHIN THE CARYN M-ANNED COFMUtdITY LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ON Till~ {TEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVEIPJE - APH: 225441 -8, 27, 41, 42 A1+R? 225. 151 -S, 7, 8, 10-17 A. Recitals. (i) Kaui -'fn and $road hai filed an application for the )ign Review for a portion o-f Tract No 226 � as described in the tle of this Resoluiion.c> Hereinafter, the sptbject'Design Review request is referred to as "the application", (ii} On March 9. %1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho- P__,.=or.gr_ held a maeetinq to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adopticn of�his Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. ANIL NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution arC true and correct, 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting an March 9, 1988, including written and oral staff rep s this Conmlission hereby specifically finds as follows. (1) 't7r the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (2) That the proposed design is in accord' with the Objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in Aich the site is locate4; and (3) That, the proposed design is in compliance with each , Of the applicable provisions of the Caryn Planned Community and Development Code, and (4) That the proposed design, together with the ° conditions applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvement \ the vicinity, L, r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. RE: DR for TR 12643,- K 6 B March 9' 2988 Page 2 ased n the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 aha , this corAission beleby approves the appIicatiOn, subject to each and every condMtion set forth bfl'ow and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (1) Alll)p °rtineat conditions of Tract 12543 approval as contained in ReSOIction '85-77 sh 11 apply. ` F� (2) Trim detail shall be used on all side or rear, e'evations exposed to view wrom a public street cansisteyet with Phtle 1• (3) WinOws. shall be added on the side of any garage that has an elevatlim exposed to public view. (4) Natural stone shall be used on those elevations featuring stone veneer rather than the cultured stone products. Applicant many submit alternative stone styles to the satisfaction of the City Plannar+ 4. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall rertify to ne adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1988. 1) PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: j Larry J ATTEST• i Brad Buller, wpw cre ate—' I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of_ rho Planning Commission of the City Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify taut the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the planning Commission ofi�the City of Rancho Cucamonga;, -�at a regular meeting of fire Planning C OMINission heist on the 9th day of March, 1988, by the following vote -to -wits AYES: COM9MISSION€RS: NOES: COMMISSIONER& _ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ✓ 'f S r f ` �YN 4•M�i V4 $ 4 �N�4� Yi ySy G7 ago uYY� A�,q#[•'"q!47 �4y�'F g'"gg iM�Yi ii•� 7N 4'`ri I `r M.. I It 'l I ` 0 -t It ax .. is J9. dx qtj .;•� YI � 'Oif.� r r 3', M ' Yy. %zj ar IS V ,. St J ti be'l 0.7 i If R vR'.�iii r l N M � l w s Jig Y N ! w �; ffi w Ka i K I 1 A c V O !,fl ! g YN `sVR1$ �R] s� Ri1r F• � Y a s za is or dg _seew I+�gnL +�= n' Nr Nn Is t[ ` �•`_ �N �� YO Aia as 4SO owr Y..L'NO 4 «vVi ai,`.i to.i'i'' _r y Pt. r Y � s4n K iY o :P' ',tit. !S� q lux, re s ji iq A w i i4 �L Pus ri N-a P L A 4$ v 4 I r�`� 1 gyp }•�_ �y ♦r o rr XZ 11 Y_ l_��� V �} " r. .. 1 M-w r 4: It low JIr � "nia E A —Z A 9 t.-x a R 1\ %I C 1' :1 Oak 4C� A 6uS D & *,G. ac Y Law�I.{M br{ pW yQ 4 �.(yr; YYY L Y I W *• x w C Y •� "'k �li�..o oM 7 w��E Y� �yb 'qi o�y� �pp�, C' N� L�qb b1�'5'.N ^GL� �riN �id�) Yp1 «4�NN �r i.1 Iye�N* ANN ?M�Y W { � Y �P6 ,ss ry Y✓ C09� i6 lit all AlO A yq Qwy may' N N,~.M9N �iM ^. .CN �i p.@ F•N tNY ^ HIM payy po�vC `P pw � p A • tf�' _ �Y _ gp X1$6. ' �Ng4gn is ell IM � a.Q yy iee s CM' q +S {r�. i O $`r yl3i� 9 �I�C. YO 'a «a: y,Y. 6` Qj Q Y O► MMff dS� ��0. - �y'� ��'^Ri S ��.. �Yi Y �^ OW.Ha �'�•�' ���•. � «NAM �; 04 L s C. Nip ls : •� � q B aai V `4 4 aiY �QNN91�Fo 71 «q N.�iMy j i •, wa. c ke$ �' �5��� -.,t `�y.M #dam,., aCyp. Q V A �� ~ p ± .;L g' C V C q,N -T'� qZ3 N yl o �Y i+ u � � rY �N �� 4`�j,l� WN� �f � �p •M N��^% !�i t,' 3' o Ji A L Wa88+° .Q 4"' 16 4 cu iW QQ i75 hp u� s S� a �g Ti Vc. ?4 N A N 6 N pl it gc $Pb accs.. ayyy���� 1 401 L��S ^2 �N S JAI x IM j J¢ ill I A oML Y�N y' rig «� Abr M a 3 $.m ea`a St pp„OLA.'yyi'u N � ad'' aY,, y a Mod .6L y rM•p•+N N 1w. a$ y�y�y� �11�r YY py==yM,,-Y K a�s�w6 C�R_'A fl ' rip ' a it p ' y YNYN LV _ erp w L t gu. �Y o � S xv �e�Tx a Y�� Y i L u Sri m Isla ej r v pp sf $ ai w y� � ��' .L. i'� tea• R�+:OOCCyffwll r�l.�n�6 LL`y�roN 91�r`NN q oLIM a� �� Sjh� I a g C aA a O/� : 9i RRR aY :'J LiNM � Vs- m�. YY.P`N n WOW obom:A*Wly. Yf, e I ps pOff N s�Q�B £"�P1.SY� W.$� �.N.'• p, .., L I g ui ^ + iL:L3 III �; *�r• Yy4y� .qy � q ■g /� n a ao i' -- A' gyp& ,h 2 slug P N C.�J -�l. '.�4 "7�µ..$'"' g (� Vg isle +f Faso. w'•+$,_ L. f�€' .: .q_ IJ , g d O ' 4 . A�.. `+tl.� C :�uR O �� tly7j, � `�• H Ml. t.�, i�A 7A LCf��.iCCN .- S L K s .. eid L.0 ViM av TL Till � 4 '-< $ TL 44 u N6 i� OI [�L � - {�.1Y'� {{yp� I•a S •.Yn y� .1 `�.''^ ����� .d L11 •d�L ..4.11 �f1� GN R fy� 4AI t. ! y y� � CI4q i 4yy YUip. INS e� a. -xhR ~. �H� 7ep yyYY��ypVyp � Np.AS pY V. T 6r sL Y�nT - 94 �+7 tiNCO aj - YjViSyV` ��y� `:� gd�si ;py �w �^ COQ'L �i`3��M . �tYy Y »l iiw 6 q Y `mot (� �y �'y T `p�G*+h 4. a` ypp tL �y` t+. � {yq� y� #.iC +yQY� 1. •C 6 y�i �y•ej. �� 4 yaN6'.O`C 4M pp.� .Ya �C" (✓ XO %. 4 i0 t! l.�. �u tY N 777 W V' 4y V' 4 S aC Y J% H i -CIS 145 a.8 IC � . IL V » M ZE D tie Y f C cam.. M as Cp °gip'p g}�« ,»ggt 8i a..i2�y; w i w .csr � � ute4:a La is $ s3+f x. � PO (� 'Hus ti a3 an 9 w ai,� w 4 i r fif � w Is 4P; go .yLc 14. Y i z; flu 14 1 .Yr V R is- all 1 lit tit c SITw �7lkl Z. 1rt w i w G u x w vii y tR x C9 4 TY N SA qw K _1 ;alp.. ti ,;; ,~ Q pN Y al Ar 6d v> y M _M �n .a� Vs �a �a s U -1 C.� i 9 y O r l �q 35 f e Y R yys t o gza- cc qY � a� 'ss0 6'gOr pyO. ti 6 > Y O 9 N V O w L Y Y I Od. w.'�p �i „?a st �'' a��. y°u �• m „ ^Y aQ gs Yx."� w� N =Np Lv NN.y. N �V �qC 1M CI y� Q� SY ~A. Oq s Oy 1YY L :JV iFI�. Mau �.. 2�.. E6 ~� 4riuL` �cCW h�Gi �___.. - __ .:__ ___ _. •,-,.4 ..._ ,�,.,.�.� =: �,11 1 ``'�1� ��,�Q�ir V�.rAl'`�D�E�i � _ .. _ , . STOF REPORT x S � IDATEz� / � March 9 1988 1I .r TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Con461on FROM: BafrYe R. Hap Senior Civil Enginn:6 �= BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., As ;acfate Civf1 yiner �) SUBJECT: Modification to Co fttans of Approval for ?arcel Mip 999337. arce a 9 n r•__ essen �r - ;r €aauesT UT undergroundf of utilities along 9t1t. developm`nt of an Industrial_ Park and,, el in the GLheral Industrial District 046ar the northeast corner of Vineyard" Ave rile the the Maps tAPN 209 >012 -17,20 Es kap I. LCCKGROINID: On February 24, 1938, / ho panning Commission conducted, a public nearing to' consider tU modtFication to Conditions of'Aplaroval for Parcel Mqp 9537, Parcel Mao 9972 and OR SG -13;; Fs a res-alt of the testimony, the Planning Con+miss�4on cantinued,.the public hearing and requested staff to complete tht,161lowing; it a. Prepare a Resolution of Denial, and b. Contact the�;owner„o€ Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 9537�fto determine his understanding of the condition to undergroland overhead utilities along ninth Street. II. ANALYSIS. 1, Staff has prepared the Resolutions of Denial as requested by the Planning Commission on R,bruary 24, 1988. `,,,An addition, staff has contacted and received i`letter (Exhibit "A") from the owner, of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 9537. He has agreed to relieve the Messenger 'Investment Company of the requirement to underground the Overhead utilities along thei?,_Ailinth Street frontage. A project is currently in the Development Review process for Parcel- 1 of Parcel Map 9537, Since the owner and f y'ture DeveyVer agree, to accept full responsibility for thei uZrgrounda`ny, of. thR overhead utilities° along the ninth Street frontage, staff could include the undergrounding requirement as a recommended Condition of Approval with the future project, STCN C 0 PLAN #INN - W1 (% STAFF REPORT-�} PM 95- 37, PH 072 ANT! DR 84-13 -' MESSENGER 14ARCK 9, 10,08 � "PAGE 2 r If the Planning,.Commiss 4 approved the ii°icatiofi.'`� the Conditions of proval,.then the MaTteri Rr Livestmtlnt Company wojld be permitted occupy tits i ecetttly 'ecinstr ;[ hui idings. 'as Staff has �tcluded a,. Resolution of A�; t'i�e,:l wall as the" requested R _olution of Denial +with the stiff re fkt* III. ; CONCLUSION: Since the owper and future Developer otparcel ' parcel Man, 953711" has accepted< the rei0onsibility to undergmgnd the ovWrhead 1! utilities along the,Nioth Street frentage -to Citli Standards, `staff, supports and recommends tiie modification to the Conditions of.' Approval, IV. RECOWINDATIDN_: Staff recommends that the Planning, Commission c,onsid -r. all input and elements and after, such " nsideration eitherr' 1. Adopt the attached Resolutions approving tho modificat for ion iII Conditions of Approval.. - 2. Deny the ,modificationL` for Conditions -of Approval by` adopting the attached Resolution of Denial. Respectfully submitted, v_ Barrye R. Hanson Senior Ci ii E v ngiteeer ,. Rkh.11SEsd Attachments; Letter from Owner Parcel 1. PM 9537 (Exhibit "A *)F4` „ Staff Report & Exhibits, dated February 24, 1988 Resolutions of Approval Resoluticm of Denial r iiifff � a ' a 23,20 R. ORAMZ MS?t' AMMUZ 1- AMIMI 1, ZA $ 08 {71$i _ 92-63 65 , (r February 2E,; ISMI lit. dos Stota City of Rancho -- Coca conga Engineering Departsont F.D. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: underground utilities On 9th -Stmt Jr � Dear Mr. - Stotru _ As per our phone conversation of February 25, 1*38, Highland, the owner of PARCEL #1 Parcel Yap #"37 in the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, and the futuro Dovelbper agree to install, underground utilities as per., the City of Cucaeonga Standard or a* planned along property line en Oth Street. We hereby r*lieve the l o;seoger Investment Company fr%n It's prior comeit'eeni for this Installation. c U - airRCe� Y Karl Sator U.S. Highland /Pros. ZXMIM a l� �. G1T= ---O -.. N.CH4 -AC C4.M4 NGA. STA►Ff, REPORT' DATE: FeGruary 24, 1958 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Modification to Conditions of Aoroval for Parcel Mao 9997 7sacee ap — and -OR t3G =�" sseo er �- Pt requos .4 Mo the and ons"• of pprova regviring,. tit undergrounding of sties along 9th Street for the development of ar. In vial Paa�,ard relaxed Parcel Maps . in the General industrial District (Subarek 2) located on the northeast corner of Vireyard Avenue, hnd 90 Street. (APN 209- 012 -17,20 & 21) tt I. ABSTRACT: The Developer is requesting _n g a reduction in the length of utilit� undergrounding along 9th Street regkdred by three sep4rate approvals on the property. II. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map 9537, approved on March 26,, .1986, subdivided an "L" _ shaped Parcel into a small (4.5 acre-,) Parcel an the, corner of Vineyard Avenue arid' 9th Street and a larger (20,9 acre) patcel extending from 9th Street to Arrow Route (cxhibft rB"), OR 66,13, approved on July 23, 1986, consisted of an Industrial Park an Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 9537 (Exhibit "C "). Parcel Map 9972, approved on October 22, 1'25, subdivided DR 86 -13 into 3 parcels (Exhibit "D"). The first project approved, Parcel Map 9537, required that the utilities be undergrounded along tly+ entire 90 Street frontage with the development of either Parcel 'l or 2. DR 86 -13 was the first of the two parcels to be developed;, therefore it :vas conditioned to underground the entire frontage n required by Parcel 'clap 9537. Subsequently, the sane condition,:was imposed on Parcel Map 9972. Sj The Developer has. sold Parcel 1 of Parcel tap 9537, and it is currently undeveloped. � PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' PM 9537,.PM 9972 and DR, 86.13 - Messeoger K. February 24, 1988 .i Page 2 The Developer's 7.2 er requesting the condition modification is attached as Exhibit "E ". Copies of the sondition.j in question for, each project are shoran on U "cxh b.it- "F1. The w0ding on each is sowAhat different, but the length of uadergroundin6> and when it is to be completed is consistent.. The r:�tilities in' relation to the property are shown on E h b14t "G% ,. I1I. 'ANALYSIS: There were three basic reasons why the entire srontage was required to be undergrounded with the first parcel to be de- toloped: 1. The Developer had given staff the impregsion they Parcel 2 of PM 9537 would'be developed first. Also,- Parcel 2(-ias 4.6 times larger, than.. Parcel 1, therefore . it appeared reasonable Ito require the ,additional undeegrounding fronting Parcr41--.1.,.in order to spread the test to the largest area possible,/ 2. It would Glean up the entire frontage at one time. 3. It would reduce the chances of the future,,Developer of Parcel 1 claiming the fairly common corner parcel hardship, because he would have utility undergrooWing on both the Vineyard Avenue and 9th Street frontages., The Developer is requesting thr- condition madific�tion for the following reasons: f s , 1. He states that he misunderstood the.tondition. He felt that•' actually meant to undergrod4d the portion fronting each pa &4i as it developed, Oich is the usual practice, 2. He did not budrei, & fficient ,.ids to complete the entire��" length of under�rqunding, becau�../of his misunderstartdidg 3. He is nearing completion of the project_. and needs to obtain occupancy clearance. ?'Staff's response to the above Js as follm. 1. The limits of,, required unaergrounding were clearly stated in each approval. - Alin, staff �meinbers,,rEtra*er discussing the ' issue with the Developer's representatives. PLANNNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT .:.,. .. PM- 9537, PAi_.9912.and DR-,K-43- , - t sspnger February 24,1988 Pagey` 2. and 3. Both of these are consequences of the initial a teged misunderstanding. _ 15 .0 IV. CONCLU USVM Staff feels that there were sound reasons for requiring the additional length of undergrounding and thaj, the requireirent was .. clearly written for all three approvals, ' ? Y. RECQMMENDA ?�e Staff r!�,,wwnds denial of the request fer a ' condition modification, Respectfully °subiM teed, ; f, .11 Barrye R. Hanson Senior C',� i e' Engineer BRH;JS:sd Attachments: Vicinity Ma��(Exhibit "A `) Parcel Map 4537 (Exhibit "B ") DR 86413 (Exhibit "'C "i Parcel Map 9972 (Z hibit "D ") Developer's Letter (Exhibit "E") Conditions_of Approval (Exhibit "F ") P�! 9537 DR 8b -13 Pitt .9972 Utility Locations `(Exhibit "+sn) i r� KI "ba 3 7 i �f A�Ciio rTCALMONGA 1'416 7 DR90.t., PM '9q72-' C'-7 `.. ArxUOW PARCEL MAP NO. 9 5 3 7 Arrow Roafo CITY OF GII+iM*i G DnqmoN l 1 m IF bF WMOITlaA/S N ARM MAPIAT -: C-8 1, co��o AMONGA �,U C ST B min FOR INDFt1Y'RLLL ANA COUMMA6 Uyt ONLY .. SYIri'fNl rF-NTA'iiY!`. PARCEL MAC' NO. 9972 MAY' ins tN CIT Y OF RANCHO aXAMONGA B .utaayto av ° ,MYltdOr4eed��fV,a 1RRfst,wr. •f 9{y irCn,OR 2?e sY A H cJ MVR,PMa3f HiR0 wRt;.,ac,,, l.t`filkYY" �w+++x.arresnrry n�N41RN /w „- toNRC6yCft - . •*tRYR40R!N1R -'t NRNr C- 9090R9a1 .0myCA th rRyiR- �'l`Jr r,� RyC T..xvn-P ata:OtOerN �wvtNR..,SVIR ♦2114 W52mf Il4ROaelC lSpf.9MR awe �i teal pq,�gtygp ... 2! 7M4. J*, &%CMRWti aRAMfc� tauty tR its ♦.t..�.�`''T3'�. ""n" <azc,. ii: �i t !''R.xarn4'. ,� do. I It S:41.2 Jn , '/p 'Q • +ti tips a. </ ':.m a �iZ In CIW r a l i IMF ME �''► r RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMSENOMINVIS M.ENiLO ANY January 26, 1988 CITY OF F_WCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 "C" Baseline Road Rancho Cvk—r.)Aga, CA 93,730 Attar>tiOn: Xaren Xissack Reference: arrow Business park Ninth Street vnde;rgrounding Reriuir&Mant PM 9537, Pit 9972, 6R 86 -13 Doar He. Xissack: Messenger investment Ce;ipany r.zeiuests that the Planning Commxasion grant mc.,Jfication of conditions of the following: PH 9537, 1% D972, DR 8a -13. The fear, of for this review are as Follows: pM 9537"- $207.00, PM X472 o $20'3,04}, 9R review $251.00, for a total of $66'.x.,00. A brief history of the project and conditionx is ao follows: 1• Parcel Map 9537 (muk -2losed) divided the °sxisinq property into 2 parcels. Parcel 1 went to s ad-�!fersnt owner and our gartneriftip purchased Parcel 2. cThe condition to underground the existing utilities o.:j. Ninth Street. Paragragsh G.3.b.. ( attrched) raquire.a underg.rounding prior to arc. OCcupsndyy_ permit for archer Parcel* 3 or;J. RIC interpreted .thiii7to wear. `L') %at the entire frontage (Parce:,s 1 a ,2 PH 9537) Would .,be undergrounded but that paren tage (Pal =01 mould be responsib3e ,xq any for our project ;cel 2 PM 4537) !!�f4 6 occupancy p �x$eita on Paa'cel 2 and the owner of Pai;cel 1 PX 9537 would underground his project froht.�ege; an occupancy pm it on his parcel. pr 'or to 2. DR 06 -13: Damming this design revieW, Planning reaUested a plM rer Parcel 1 PH 9537-to be :included in our Maaifier _omen. Since this property o�znsr ,-cooperated, we included his site irr` our Master Plan. The DR, 56-13 condition under t°Engine:ering Division" Paragraph 3.,b.' (attached) `stated,: as dial -,; *.he conditio for PM 9537, maarp ©r CONOITIONS a5 i aP. W t3 PM 99IL AtYVHo 'Mi.rCW'- ` *y4A tom: �Ia. aSareen Rissacit CrTY or p"Cgo WC to tat, January�5, 1998 Pane Two kI that ! hey gmQV: t`` cat undergrounding roe_xufrad was thee entire trea'rlt4 Y4 of Parc*lS 1 & 3 Of Phi 9537. Irovover, it was un deerz�tcOd that the t$ai� would be . Int conjunction with the davaiopeent of oawh Parcels MIC did not consider ruur ue d orgrourdizsg r+e�i reea:ent 'to be (Parcel the drat pole �+ast � Wees� or our Property line (�'aroel Phi 9!5371 in accox-da►rlcaa With Your undergr-oundinc r` *rr rsireserats { + nnini� Resolution no. 86.77) Cos aiss# +an 3. Parcel I&p . 9972 (ati4c «.%o ) : , AS RIC wa�sr' r cur devexi. Brat (Parool. 2 PM 353T P ogracsinq .-in Pare**:nerae, r+ecx ziredl us to kuLdijgde eau " our finanet3a�t in ardor to meet Frith their f. p.�ajem.:t further PZ -`%# #acid $Ct t 'hcus t Slit' it t �1 15» �SZC becai rea at t s� 'late requir"Ontt IRposed can MIC by�OW.r financial partaesi r, The underground„ing condition 04 this map under ff$p*0irl Condition*+ paragraph (atttached� refers to the '"entire project frontage" 4,;a 904s ass to describe it as being property line of Parcel 3 PM 9373ta Zvou the t3sot Tsai a or vineyard. In fact, the PrOJOct frontago is only from the easterly Property lire of Parcel 3 FM .+397 to tztse w+ee:tex3y property Tins or +'arcol 2 P t ( approximately too I Last oil vineyard) . _ . 9873 E The Planning Commission's current res *lut�an undergraunding arc existing utilities aetetaoa� that developer � a hen be resp bn sibls for 'ndesrgrounding all exiatin overhead utility lines .including the �eAoval and r*14tsd au nrtim to and within the limits of that aarvseic ,�e;.�p :E".% g pales Adjacent lines area On then p _LM nrciect, the . Of aacc�tapl#mshee4 the under gez saszdi g adjacent to r**t a Within tithe limits of Our dayslopme nt by tder'grOundin elan Parcels QT PM 997$ t; the rfreet g g cels 3. & 3 Glee east Ot our pole west of our praja►at once thee First project lfm tes. It is, logiaai to assumes that when par"' 1 of PM 9'537 Is developed, there �rould be rer�iremtnts for them to undergs�aund the utilities adjacent be and in front Of their development. Your currant zesolut on its Undoralr'oundingr denies net address reimbursement Of the undergrounding that would bar araQmt iaddr in Thant o the ad j acent I aircels an the pro j+act 514 4 Of the striet. The e:it r - y r current agreement for reimbursement c! improvemenL•s and (ondergrgeandinet of Qvsrheeaict uti2itias public aij 4 only inzdiaatees that reimbursement, woule3 coerce from the boner itiq Parcels which are described only an the opposite side Qf the r, IViESS�PdGiRhItVEStMFhI ,e;QMFW�Y �."'��,""'. �� a,...w.,• ,t. � � .� o 1Kss. xatrei� �ieaaaack CITY or McHo cuawfuGfi rT2tYiit ofi, $981 p Wage lea streaet, nit qn the project aide. 04 the street. ?'t seat* that the intent ar tha rOquiremaust for une ayutuling utilities is for the benefit of the project that the utili`zy lines are adjacent �to, and within the l.imita of the development. Barry Haman past aactiiig City Engineer has, stated that tharse cogditiona (at,, pl,eced an these particulars res►iews3 Ftaere trigger ad at the first occupancy Permit; because hie Celt twat' rare 'tt 1, r d 3 of Phi 9973 could beat. the burden bert•r than p xcel � of -,pX 9537. We Niel that ' this is ate unfair airqum "anti one iii, which, 5ar2y Rarna*p is Slot. ,its a position to aava ate.. Darizig the Planning d a3.ss on aainu os Of ,l'h1.y 23p 19816 iar Vtsich DR 85 -13 was raeviewod, there was 0s01144i0n r09aa",is� the 1*aOquii arattant of. undergrbundi:�cf glectrica lines along "vi�leyaax� ■rid attaching theme xe tirtsm,ents to the si *)vOla°?+arient) On parcels 3 A ar 3 of Iii 9972. At ghat tiNg, th,6 Plcrsniri ' oiesa3saaitsn satcacpiixed that it vas an unfair: condition to the si+ave?t . del etod hr. xaansaui d s reecmRaandAttion for <af now r p�-es j eGt aEns�, > DR 86-13. WO 3�es that this alp or sirs t reason-J'»q applies to the overheard utilitiea along 1finth StrCat outwida of :cur limt��CSa of daavelox. �§At. Mescaenger Investment Company ' re ssv6 oe the' abcje mentioned parcel m maps a dDeign Itoiew bti*dto th \I occupancies of the respective sites and 5i+�t to the, first aocupancy of any property alcsnq Ninths and We look forward tee hearing your decision o�j this utter. I� we, can be of any assistZace to you or your stai'fi pleaes'c3if we hesitate to contact us. Wry truly ycuarf� f i i CAMPJt" ac tt`.1'eot or Project kl4m ages fr cc4,7eff Gordon /MIC Vf Yi1 f i ,,MfssFlya ��4Vf5tMrMTCw,4ANY PM 9531 9th Street - Existing ove -head electric lines Tess than 66 Kai, the fi,q awni ati of in6 an the norift side of 9th Street from - �( y property lineoto the :rst- pole west of Vineyard Avenue shall be placed underground prior to issuance of. an occupancy permit for either Parcel 1 or Parcel 2. OR 6G -13 9th Street: Existing overhead electrical lids less than $6 &v_an5V elecom inications lines on the north'-side of tth Street fray the first pole east of the easterly property line to the first pole west 'of Vineyard Avenue shall be placed underground prior to issuance of an - occupancy permit for any development." i P'i 9972 9th ST -The ex #stin4` "overhead :utilities (telecommunications and e eetr i ca T on the project side of 9th Street shall be undergounded along the entire project frontage extending from the first pole east of the A.T. & S.F. icailroad -Spur along the easterly property line o the first pole west of Vineyard Avenue prior to public, improvementt acceptanc! %or, occupancy for Parcels 2 ar 3, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one -half the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street it feasible from the presently undeveloped propertieS. r �� " UNIT OF M00A 0 F L"Cll4dtD TlL9iVS CI- 1 30 OF CITY *A�7,�jo CUCAMONGA NS D►xi RESOLUTION! NO. _..:.. _. A RE OLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A MODIFi%ATiON OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL, MAP 9537, A��$$UBDIVISION OFr,25.4 ACRES OF "-LAND IRTO 2 PARCELS, LOCATED l ; THE NORTHEAST �'ORNER OF VINEYARD AVEN12 AND NINTH STREET IN THE GENERA:. INIUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) WHEREAT, on the 25th day of January, 1988, a request for a modification of condit4yps was filed by Messenger Investment Company for the above : ;tated project. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1988, the Fancho Cucamonga Planning Commission considered the above- described condition modificaiA ono MOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION: RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 3': That Condition (G. -3b.) under Engineering Division of Resolution No. 5 shall be replaced to road as follows: Ninth Street - The existing overhead utilities (tel mkwunications and electrical) on the project side of Nint`,h street shall be undergrounded as follows: (1) Parcel' 2 .. along the entire Parcel 2 frontage extending to the first pole offsite (eas., and west), and (2) Parcel 1 - along the entire Parcel 1 frontage from tFie fi st pole east of the east boundary of Parcel 1 to the first pole west of Yinerard Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy for-each parcel, whichever occurs first,, The Developer may request a reimhursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for underarounding from Future development (redevelopment) it occurs on the opposite side of the street. APPROVEC AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: -� Larry T. McNial, Chairman ATTEST: Brad u er, Oeputy ecretary I, Brad Buller, D'eputy', Secretary of the Planning C: mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do h' eby certify that the fcregoin,7 Resolution was duly and { regularly it +troduced and adopted by the P1af�ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamo'ng �assed, "-at regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March \ by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERRS: NOES: COMiMISSIONERS. �$SENT: _ COWISSIONERS ,r - -RESOLUTION NO.- ,. A RESOLUTI11 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR OEVELCPMEMT 4 � REVIEW 8643, M INDUSTRIAL kV ON PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 5537, 'LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND NINTH STREET' IN THE =GENERAL ''= :;DUSTRIAL j DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) WHEREAS, .an 26th day of January-* 1988, a reiuest for a modification of conditions was filed by Messenger Investment Company for the above stated j project. - WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1583, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission considered the above- descri"d condition modification. NOW, THEREFORE, 'rte RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COM14ISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 3 That Condition 3,bQ`, under Enginzering Division of Resolution No:US?lO Shall be replaced to read as follows., Ninth Street: The existing overhead utilities, (telecommunications and electrTc—aTI—o-n-The project side of Ninth Street stiW be undergrounded along the entire project frontage (Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5537) extending to the first pole offsite (east a,^screst), prior to public improvement acceptance ar occupancy, whichever occurs first, The Developer ' may requ4p r r- reimbursement. agreement to recover one -half the City adotped cost' for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. APPROVED AND ADOPTED T?-IS 9TH 'DAY OF MARCH, IeB8. PLANNING COMMISSION Or THE CITY OF RAOCHO CUCAMONGA BY; Larry T. McNiel, a rman ATTEST: Brad u er, epu y 'Secre pry 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoptedy the Planning Commission of the City af_Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held, _. Ott thelth day of March,, 1986, bq_'-the following vote -to -Wit: AYES, 10MMI'S5IONERS, NOSS:; COP t SSiOPiER$ ABSENT: CowlSSIONERS•, i4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESkunoh OF THE I)LANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF A CONDITION OF; APP2OVAL FOR PARCEL MAP 9972, A SUBOSIVISION OF 21,4 ACI "S OF LAND INTO 3 PAFL'ELS, LOCATED ON THE NOR,YHEAST 1RNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND -NINTH MEET Iii' THE NERAI INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) WHEREAS, on tine 26th day; of January, 7.,83, a request for c modification of conditions was fileA $y Messenger Investment Company the above' stated project. 0 , WH!REA5, on the -9th da;t of March, 1988, the Rm .ho Cucamonga Planning Commission considered the above- described conditioo modification. OLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE 'XiNCHO CUCAMORM PLu � KNIHG COMMISS:ON RESOi VED AS - SECTZON 2: That Condition U.S.) under` Engineering Division of - Resolution No. 87- 64 shall be replaced to read as f6llaws: Ninth Street } The oxisting overhead u`ilities (telecommunications AOL and esec- ca on the project side of Ninth Street shall be, undergrounded along the entire project frontage exteadivq to the first pole of alts (east and vest ), ,,rior to public improvement acceptance tir occupancy for Parcels or 3, whichever occurs first,. The Developer may request ,A reimbursement agreement to recover one -half, the City adapted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelo}xdent) as it occurs on -the opposite side of the street. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF *Rca' 1488. a PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4 BY: Larry T. cPi man 1 ATTEST: a'�4 Buller, Deput y �6�r r�etary A—, i i :, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary, of the Planning Cax�anission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do hereby certify�thit the foregoing Resolution was daly and ° regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comission Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the planning Commission held on the. 9th day of March, 1988, by the following,,vata -td -writ; AYES: CO.MMISSIONERSz l NOES: COk4OSIONERS: '1 ABSENT: aOMRISSIONEt �1 r, ~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAN"�NG COMMISSION : DENYING A MODIFICATION OF A CONGITICtiJOF APPROVAL FOP. PARCEL, MAP 9537, A SUBDIVISION OF 26.4 ACS. OF t.AMt! itiTtl ;? PARCELS, LOCATED 09 THE #Oti #3EAS1 CflR; #ER "m VINEYARD AVENU£ AND ""NINTH STREZT IN THE `�ZENERAL INDUS' <! DISTR'CT (SUBAREA WHEREAS, on the;; 26th day of danueiry//---j!P,. a request for a modificatl,,n' of conditions°'was filed by Nassengqr Iwiestment Company for the above stag,' project," �< WHEREAS, on the 9th day of �Jareh, 1988, the Rancho Cucamb�oa Plarni:ng ,.y Commission considered the .AI�Fye- described condition r «;edification.. NOW,: THEREFORE,, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAIMIRG COMMISifbk RESOLVED AS' FOLLOWS; SECTION 1; That the. requested modification is not ow0stent with City Polixy. SECTIOii 2 - That the, requested modification of a Condition -of Approval 7Fr-7a—rceTr,4ap 9533 is denia APPROVED MiD ADOPTED THIS 9T, H DAY OF MARCH, 1488, PLAN DING COMMISSTON OF THE CITYOF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ?> 8y; 1 �� Lai , y cN a r, Chairman ATTEST: 1 ra Buller, ..Deputy ecre ory I, Brad Buller, Deratty..Secretary 4f the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby _cart ify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and: adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Panclio Cucamonga, at a regaiar„meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1988, by the folloy`jpg vote-to-wit.- AYES. COMMISSIONERS.- 0 NOES. COMMISSIONERS,. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: G - J RESOLUTION NO. \A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING MODIFICATION OF A CONDI710N OF APF,40W --�QR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW IX-13, AN, INDUSTRIAL PARK { l PAP, L 2 " OF` ,PARCEL KAP 1537, LOCATED ON ! THE NORTHEAST CM&j VINEYARD AVENUE AN�j NINTH STRIXT Ih THE GENERAL -INDUSTRIAL j DISrTRICr (SUBAREA 2) WHEREAS, on 1`�`fih day of January, 1983, et request t r a modification of cor' %itions wa,s fiTeld by Messt.nger Investment CgWany for t, above shed WHEREAS, on the 9th d4y of Aarch, 19&8; the fticho C�amenga Planning Com.ission considered the above-si� scribe condition.Mdificat on. Nom, THEREFORE,` THE RANCHO CII dMX131 t QUiNNIFG COWISSIOk RESOLVER ASI� FOLLOWS , SECTI0I1 1: That the requested modifiattion is not consistent with,', City pil i"cys , SEVION 2 - That tb! requested,, modification of a condition of Approti�j or- eve gpment Review 86 -13 is denied ' ,j�PPROV0 APO ADOPTED THIS 9Ef, DAY OF MARCH, 1988. -PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY .OF RANCK fVCAMONGA BY: - Larry T.�F --Ti l, air - ATTEST: rB3u er, putytcre ary %{ Y, Brad Buller, DeFv� Secretary of the 'Manning C*mniss` on of the riry of Rancho - Cucamonga, do,;h -dreby certify that the forego�flg Resolution was duiy and % regularly introduced, pacsed, and adapted by the Planning - Commission of the City of Rancho Cucanonga, at ,a regular meetffg of 0A Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 14$8, by the folltlwing Vote, to -wit: .,AYES: CW"-'--- ONERSa NOES: COMMiSTt7FlERS. ASSENT: j, i' COWT- STONERS :'' 2 t, RESOLUTION NO. A RESCLUT.T.ON OF THE PLANNING CQAMISSIOri DENYING A - F1iaDIFICATa alt OF !4 CONP-PON OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP 9972, A 'SUBDSIVIS i `aF 21.9 ACRES OF LAND 'INTO 3 PARCELS, LOCATED THE NORTNF. S1' CORNER -OF VINEYARD AVFF- AND NIN114 STREET IN., THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL'i DISTRICT (SUBAREA WHEREAS, on the 26th ¢'� of January, 1988, a; request for a J r dification of conditions «as .. fi , by Messenger Lcvestment Company the ahbve stated project. oie the 9t of March, 1998, the - Rancho Cucamonga Planning' Cc�rnissioWHEREAS, oday ed condition efbdification. 4 flow, THEREFORE, THE RANCFO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 That th- -equested modification is not consistent with City Policy, SECTION 2 - That the requeste4 modification of a Condition of Approval T_or_7a_r—c—eT Map 9972 is denied, _t APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'Larry T. McN reT. CFa- i^m r r ATTEST Brad Buller, J _ I, Brad Buller,_ Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City off' RanchG Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and requlav,ly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning ``�- emission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetingof the Planning,/ Concussion bead on the 9th day of Marcia, 1988, by the. following vote -to -wit: AYES: MMMISSICOEps: } NOES: COMMISSIQ�ERS: ABSENT: COMMISS� ERS: 4 7- -. , -- ITY+DF'R-0)+Cfl() DATE: ISArch ig, 1988 ; J T0; Chairman and Meirbers of the Planning Ca mission R9M: llarrYe R. "iiansgr4 Settgi*Civil Eninear� BY: Jive Stofa, Jr., ;A4sociat+e Civil Eogineer ' ' SUBJECTs:' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENY Air ; TENTATIVE PARCEL MR 'f1222 :. 1 tT3 N ' i 4. ire ►� s1on oSr-"�$;are' general ;moo' parcels ei Inrlustrt Distrir.t,,. Subarea 13, TacRatcd at the southeast corner of 6th S� t, and Buffalo Avenue. (APk: ?29- 243 -10, 11, 12 and 13) , L. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIONa r. > Q, A. Action Re uested, � cD- Approval. of the proposed Ten4ive Parcel Map as shownP en Exhi ;ilt � B. Parcel slue: �a Parcel I - 1C.9 Acres Parca 2, 2.5 Arras Parcel 3 _ I.8 Acres Parcel 4 - 2.1 Acres Parcel 5 .a Z;# Acres Parcel-6 4.2 Acres C. Existing Zoning: General Industrial Subarea 1i) I IVID r, c IT9M D PLAi-'3 0(,4' IiMISSIDN jTAA kEPQRT PM Zuoaz - oltmans /0'Nnnell March 9,--1988 ` Page 2 D. Surrounding Land Else. North Nursery South - Vacant East - Vacant "! West, - Vacant E. Surrounding Renerai ; Plan and '�dyelofttnto Code .Desn a inns; . north - ,-General Industry -."1 (S sarea I3 ) SoutF - General, Industrial (Subarea 13) ° J East - Geher&l f ustrial, (Subarea 13) i West - General in �strial {Subarea 11} F, Site Gharacterisr Gsn The sly is vacant w -Ah the tC n&- slops. -apps bximately 2% to the snutl IT. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Par s to � eate fr separate parcs"; i or t Industrial Buildings wh it ?were °' ppyved„ y' the Planning Commission as D" �� -53 on February 4, 1988 (E ibis The proposed "A* street, which connec '-Buffalo. Avenue with Rochestr" Avenue, will be constructed with #4l, pavement w,,dth upon recordation of tizn Final Map.., i Ili. ENVIRil�Wt,,TAL REVIEW - ' The aWinant completed Part I of the initial', .+Eduy. "'S ate, c' ory cted a flald in estigation 'and caMietea Part 11 of the Isiitix1 5t -•dy. ' No adverse U�Vacts uRon t1e environment are,-, anticipated as a result Of this p,oject. Therefinrt, issuance of Negative Declaration is.:aapropriate, _ Ji Pl.e NNINB U*r' S rION STAFF REFORC Page TV;. C0RRtS Q been X37 to sgroun�ing pxoP4IR c�r���r ; r�r ;: i aii ituPart 13 Paper. Pvsti:lp at the Siva has also h n leCr►d. � �,. .� «`r` V. REGOWE` OP1,.l ' ! k via t ► ^de�i X t i ',he Kenning CmIC -zsion consider, �i'te�ast� I�� )"p `110 �nri "4t �eRi:ativ Parci� Ma�L ,: If ,after^ such aor'J.sider; 9 id"t ;,ee* £�oOi�is�sxa ra eima�rtd �oyai� t, n the addpf.?on ,1 *f, W at,W4 nl,,, 4esolutlorc aad i�s�anca f a 0egativ.p. Decleratip wa_ald Re.:,Pgctf411Y �StIbmitt Bar rye q. Ranson' Senior ivi ineet' ;> cx A'Gtj Vi lst7itp trap (Exhiblt >,Mh) ' Ter 41 Vie I�iag, 4 Exhibi ,!am an �- �, xhifit ky "} �, g 57 -53 iii � 7 lxi;ion ind,' Reemended Conditiowof\� o,Val j c' it ti nl c e 1 r � M L Ol Cl WX } - u r If y��� o t; Ij 1[ , Op wl JR 40A *9 'i . 'Ai log It OL ,4 v Z �=.._ "'C •� i Gov- r i d 1 C j Ld `Y a CL r, uj ` Ul t kj low +l akT + Cr RESOLUTION— NO--- Z'. A RESOLUTION OF THEcilLARNINCZ. COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITION TENTATIve FARm MAP, NUMBER 11222 Pt�cel Ma EREAS at 11 p Nutober 11,222, sv�bMftt Me 0�tmdns/O'Don"elll ure, ap Plicant, for,;the purpose of sub., viding. into 6 parcels, thfr Sa , real prop0ty sttuateA in thh cf 1� of Rancho ri onga, Ci)unt f n Bernardino, State of, cgtfgnii, ldeinifi �s APN(s) 263-10, 11, 12* and 13, located �4t the south�k� corner of 6th Street 404 t,f� ala Avenve; and WHEREAS, on March ?r1#'q88 theplanning Commissi .) "I d a duly advertise&public hearing fo(,�,,Ae above-describe�j map. NOW, THERVORK,, �THE RANCHO-CUCAMONSA PLANNING COMMIsSION RE,5qLVEO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION i: That the follow�7 'g findings have been made; Thet the wap ;is tonsistent�41ith tb�_ GAe�!'al Plaq-4 E-.3t the impro"ment of the --prorfosed subdivision ccnsistent wit General Plan. 3. That the site s Physicalli',0tablk for th proposed deN�opment. . proposed 4. ��hat tile -subdivision I and improvements w'171 not cause substantial environmenta7 damage, public health problems o�-'-have adverse affActs "bn ab4ting property. SECTION 2: This Commission fi,nds;,,,&qd cer"ifies that the Project iiii—Se—enrevitwed and con.5ider�,,d in compli,*,,nce-- with the California Environmental Ofalit A t f,1970 and, further,�this c Commission hereby� issues i�%� egaytIV6 D:C�aratian \ SECTION 3: Tha� Ye'ntative ParcO� AaP, No. 11222 -Vs he,-eby approved subject t-a-W-A-Fached Standard, CanditiChs. atid the following Speed al, Conditions: OAII str-ae-*, shall be constructed full width exce�t that sidewalk an� parkway landscapi6g�aay b4*1 deferred unti elopment of-the adjacent property 1V et 1% �. RESOLUTION V ° PAGGE 2 p .' The po tion of the ,project ato!tg E; Chester Avenue is Toeated within a-Flood hazard zot�r, 0, here orcftood protection azures shall be prouf�( 11 o certifYGd "by a Registered Civil Engineer a approved bar the, City rngirlw. A public storm dralw4as t thf -b`igh th ; ite shall be ,required and delineated on thi Fipitl Mo ; APPROVED AND ADOPTEDITHIS DAY OF 298� { PLtrNN1C+e -C", YS0:1' —a OF r tITY OF RAPCND CUU*NGi!` Carry cN `tea r`_ > MTESTt I, Brad Buller, DOPyty StCretary�+of the. Planning Co issIbn of the Cat of ` Rancho Cucamonga, 6b" Mreby o* 'fl�y that t4lforegoing R00luticn 'b� r lu and regularly introduced paesedF an'e,dr*pted�`� 'r�hj Planning Caerlissjo� of :t,ie City of Rancho Cu QAa gu; i w �14� -? � i A P`fn MW • �^ .. r i$ e�C �♦ � 'gyp � S, q4, 1•ii W � i� F ACS PJ � ? '8�x Elul il -�M� J, 4A �._ � �wc -, a• �'dr`.Ek �' war ail is lY Q,,2 iyd Z34 t 1 � . -" ,� " 1 4a= Sw x j_ -s � Fri As .—R o i�l�j ' jl uw I gi K. Tw, 1R E j �Y gyp: itgr$ _ 'g J,, ,.,,,..,, d n a • a Y�. -a alb p e a' u, E ` 1C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ►STAFF RE'FOR`M DATE: o March 4, 1488 1977 '1 TO Chairman and "ers of the Planning Co�m►i,,sfjn r, FROM " Brad BOler, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate P1al�r SUBJECT; ENVIRONMENTAL' ASSES ifT AP 78NTATI � TRACT 138261- MiKential sUbfflvision anl� rev or s x : ngle 4rO,7y lots(,�n 14 acres, a" iT •the -Low Residential 0strict (2 -4 dwelling ,;units per acre), located north '-sf 19th Street,, east of Hermosa Avenue, at tits terminus of Brissac Place - APR 202.391 -22. * Y, PSt imf AND SiT,� DESCRIPTION. A. Action�R�bquistedA, raval of Subdivi; -ion Map, Si" 'Pitn, ra r�^'P7in;lsrat4cns, aid issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project.02 i.t, 4.0 iwell'ing units per acre, C. Surrou0ing .and Use and -on in r acai ; ow , ns y esidential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single'`Fatpi Jay Residential under Construction; low- Nediu* Resi r ia) {4-8 dwelling units per acre Cant a SinnIn rAM41� ii. 4A.w4*11a1` Low Donsity Resideriial f- dwdl3inr units per acre) West - .Single Family�tesidertial; Law Density Rrzsident al (2 -4 tlling,,u"Its ans acre) D. General Plan 1 si nations �" J ro3eci`°Si : r cN Resi te'i4tial .(2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Frzeway, South - Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Lov,Residentien_, ;2 -4 dialling units per acre) West �.twr �esi:ential (2,4 &Alling.unit5 per acre) ' F.. Site Mancteris'fcs The site is currently vacant with an Wage s -ype o percent, fraaw northwest to sautheaSt. 0. : PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT TE4TATIVE TRACT 13826 - PAIlNON March 9, 19$8 , „ Path. 2 , • II. ANALYSIS: A. earkc round: On April 6, 1957, the Planning Cammisilon approved pn_a ve ract 13342. ire approval consisted of 72 detached units of which C units were being developed within a gated codvaunity and fOup unita were being 'developed under the basic standards i:t crder to finish off Heather Street and Ring "As Avenue. part of the Tract trap, a stub ,street was provided at the northeast portion of the site to allow access to a vacan� piece of proerty, General: _ B. General • The apps icatrt is now proposing to use that s *rest connec to develop six single family lots, The lots `range in size from 7,600 square feet to 11,600 square feet in area with an average lot .size of 9,367 Square feet in areto With the Subdivision Map, the applicant is proposing one basic floor plan with three elevations for the six, lots: To minimize the . perception of the same floor plan, a 'tiro -car garage with a bonus room is being proposed with two of the elevatjans ;and a three car gara4v is tieing proposed with..,tt�e thin! elevatic,n. The architectural si yle is anaistent rt�th � that appre cd for Tract 13342 to the stuth. C. Design Review Coilittee: The Committee (Chitiea, Emer ck , 11%, and e s88 prpAoln recommended aproval`s ttothefolowig cordtion 1. Window trim shoula be provided around alt window,. ` 2. Native st66z: should be used on the elevations Instead of stucco ,:torte. Recently, the Planning Coairtssion has expressed a desire to create a unlform wall design fol- the freeway corridor. Al a result, staff recommends that thz final design of the gall along the north ?rant boundary.be reviewed and approved bj,;the Planning Commission prior t\) the issuance of buili :ng permits. This action 'would be c(lnsistent with recent approials -, of other projects along the freeway corridor.}, j i D. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has �;c �.fete'ii part I I or e n a Study. Staff has Part II and identified one area of potential adverse J,41ict - noise. ;,Due to the proximity of the site to the futuit Foothill Freeway, C the:tratt wfll be(Q'expo -4ed to noise levels in excess of city f s~andar�ais. An acoustical anrlysis has been submitted to t submitted to address possible rittigation measures to reduce the noise'to a leka'1 6f a less th,i.s significant effect. Bed n the recommendations of the report, a six (6) foot h%, ',sound wall, M combination with the distance from the travf :lane, and the depressed building pads, would be necessary to reduce the noise level below 65 VIEL (the Gity maximum). l MtR�/ch 0, ista 1 Page 3 idith AM, iri lasic+rr 'of the recc,, ntVif6rs ^ � tr acolltual analysis, 'sufcf finds O"t .�prs pNif �a�w�i�:e� with", the *oaditian o aprft ►t►�t ,. � itav 4i,,5Q tt; nit Impact on . i"kit!"'o2iri/ ntw''{�.+'Zf tt/1�'(F��(t�y ��$ "ZiMoAynM�i}sss��`pi��Coro i*x ���r #GriCfl �./ t� l3egativa Dei':arattonitrdf#e tp�arlppriate x- ,• J .._� XYI. FACTS rt l iFS: tai':? jlrojeYt intent t '. atie an+ Kati " ;\ art an te we ' Vd*- The prow. X117-- not,btw a't4rmental to the PlrbT , i;kUk gr stee .Y. or OQ*qq,O nf*� nces or siqp#f .at�t adverse envirt ental eff�.. <; - jd&,irton,. the proposed �tMe xnd sits pion, togotLer, With thl roc +,td oorcdittons of ap rb;fal, , u are in aiq►li�anc lii9 app'li, abha tyro i iars o the tie }velopment We and City s-�c rds. r RIESPONDEWEs This item has bsr rt iaverlt #a itt The ?RaOu tiie pr" � RmPaper a$ a joublic bt4aff &n', llQi �1! _ p OK,"ta oo-*fier.4 Nith%t 3W f t of ttre si3a i / Y. ar"OOftwTION.. Staff rasctxasar da- that t v Kim" i:oaerltssion aaprOR erR #wa Tact 1W.1 'VI" Ot adoFtMOn Of R ReSOlU'49r};witir condi't =ofi3 aR� �,rr58, {� 3_ �!'t'�7�,� Dfi$ ".,�Sl`,�'"rwitZrf: €teSp lysn� rad e , City Pla er AttarhMents; wxbibit "A" Lana y' YA C Exhibit "B'° , Subdvision�tia . Exhibit x'10 ( - Si tCeradi nr pl An exhibit " ; }�``- �' " "t4irtg Ellvakioi ij Easolution of #roval;, ' h Wndit:'ons J01 o. �. J. � � •.ti�.i �.,�. •.\ � ppl�y;{ 4 { i �� i'� ►I[ Gp .a w • 1r LM MY p NC qty �•��_'_. • �s- > u LM Al CITY OF ir SCALL`; 1 � 'its oi i s '" icy � ,ei ••� p t fi � i�1 f L_z Ell w c d � � � o //�y.' 7aa, 1 C HO' CUCANIOMA i f f I . F r. IH{ilel'_ .�,. . EX a c If e F r; W CI�(•' Y l r v 1j► f� , t�* i ITENf , N �f PU NUNG DIVSM E:�i-omir- G K.ALE..,,.:fn�._.... � G 0701 -0? 0 3-9 -88 PC Agenda Q 2. of 3 i i It i r �i CITY C PL'ANNING I SM - - " 1C.", ;1 PLANNING Djv SM EXHIBIT, SCALE, a � Z 0 LL i, tA r tj N 1C.", ;1 PLANNING Djv SM EXHIBIT, SCALE, r f k �k CITY C PLANN ,� r r i x LL' I LL Q n LE { CITY (F T :`rE�Y: �� CUC, Ky t�L ti 'vG TITLE �-. } t 7A :J1 IL CITY OF �\ RANCHO Cl, A�NK) PLANNING D(,N,6,m j vF g DIN �C rn �s Y� CITY CF r y 0 E t I G CITY_ ITEM: ALL- i 0 �i y 0 E t I G CITY_ ITEM: ALL- i 0 RESOLUTION 40. A RESOLUno''k 4 THE PLANNW COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI"U APPROVING 1 - ,JTIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13825, A RESIOEMAL SUBDIVISION AM DESIGN REVIEW OF SIX (6) SINGLE FM;e' LOTS ON 115 ACRES OF LAND IN THE' LOW RESIDENTIAL - :STRICT (2 -4 OWELL FITS PER VRE), LOCATED NORTH OF 19TH STREET, EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, AT ;ITH NORTHERN TERMINUS OF BRISM PLACE - APR 202-191 -22 IJ c; A. Recitals. � (i) parinan Design and Development, Inc. has filed an application for the approval.,of Tentative Tract Nap No. 138 as described in the titl of this Resolution.-- Hereinafter irk this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract- Map request is referred to „as "the application”. iii) On the 9th of March, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appltatio r y} and concluded said t1ai,oing.on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of -this gesolution have occurred. 1 8. Resolution. NOV, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the 1 Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that dll ef`the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon sub_tantiai evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearin on March 9, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Coeatlssion hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The applicatior�alplies to property located north of 19th ! Streets east of Hermosa Avenue, at the northern terminus of Brissac Pace with a width-of 298 feet and a depth of 230 feet and is presently_vacant; and (b) The property to the south, east, and �st,is deesignated for residential uses and is developed with single famrtiy homes. The property to the north is designated for the future Foothill Freo.way;;and is presently vacant; and (c) The project, with the ret:, aded conditions of approgl -,complies, with all odniew development standards of the City -of Rancho r Cucamoonga; and f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NUJ. TENTATIVE TRXT 13825 4 PANNON March 5, 1988 I� Page 2 J (d) The development of 5 single family lots on 1,5 acres of General Plan land is consistent x'ith the Low Residential land use designation -of the . 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings -of i facts set forth in paragraph 3 anti 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and + concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Cods, and specific !' plans, and (b) The design or improvements of the tt*tQtive tract is consistent With, the General, Plan, l Development_ Code, and specif`f -c plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of j devel'opment proposed; and (d) lbe design of the subdivision is not lfktly to { cause substantial environeentAl damage" and avoidable Injury to humans and Oldlife or their habitat, and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problmi And (f) The design of the tentative tract will rnt conflict with any easesent acquired by the public at large, now of record, for• access through or use of the property wlt'yin the proposed subdivision. 4. ibis Commission hereby finds and certifies that ,'tc project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Qommission hereby Usues a negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in pai4sraph, i, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and ncorporateu'herein by this reference. i Trams. (1) The tract shall be annexed to the hqw er$s association for Tract 13x'142 and the CC A R's revised- y accordingly prior to the recordation of Tract 13825. (2) A lot line adju,%Uer>t between Parce -s "� ,and C of tl Parcel Hat to include the totafl area of Tract' 13825 within parcel I shall be recorded prior to recordation of the Tract 13826 final map. ° `� PLANNING C pISSION RESOLUTION 1Nt1. TENTAITVR 1'WT 13826 - PA NNON March 9, 1988 -. Pam 3 ; Dessf6n Review - (1) ,front yard iandseaping shall be provided to create a consistePt streetsdape throuctout the gated %' coraetni 11je landscaping shill i0cluded, -at `a. C'J { mieisarrar, ".�sri� 16-pallor; ,xtwey one -5- gallon tree, sheubs,') groundcover, and a .. perar dnt irrigation system. The plans, ;shall be rev andl;approved by the Cfty Planner prior to the issa won of >,bui1ding permits. (2) A sound teali shall b*\reauired i_Rn#, the north tract boxidary as recoftunded y ° ';'tea ac a5ticai " engi eep. The design of the WAIT Fha61 be re Cleared arid'approved by the Planning Cormission prior to the issuance of building permits. (3) Pri(Y'1'- io the issuance of building €its. a fiirai ecoui-Jca;! analysis: shall be scOv ttea to:• addre3s �Fonstrv!16ti 3'n techniques necessary ud redude iptgrior noise le i$ to less thsk 45 CNEL. _ Tbe. A, .g�;s4s shall also, address any changes in -fie des%,e, =cif the freeway. t4:) Native stone mall be used on '='tote building elevations 3n,; place of stucco stoaa. lbe ,,final plans shall t± roviewed and approved by the s.: rty Planner rit -r-io *te Issuance trf tui7 i p trg_ permits;; , A (5) Window detailing 'shall be provided around all wladoss.,ti the final `plans shall be Mierad anti ' approved'. by the City, Planner prior to they +Jsuance of building permits. 6 The = Deputy _Secretary to tnis cowlssi on s"II certify to .the ., adoption of this Resolution, APPROM APO ADOPTED THIS .9iN DAY OF MARC% 1988. PLANNING Ctk�3tI$SiON Or Ti-g CITY Off' RANCHO CMAMQNDA ii BV, ' arry . e , MIMED �.� J ATTEST: � r ra u er, epu y Se cre r q a �u 7 _..J! it _ . ..,: , . ... - :. � - -. • l +� c : 11 9 '�wy�1t 41A atlw M Ca4i'� �it�$TLOA�1 S! �y,�w� if � f ai +i 4fyl> ti y q{. y�{.rr V {Qy ' � U 3Fvf y�yyY®t �L �1MT y !j zug . • .! aSltl RR 4 ?s i �y g y,. re.' '. y +ym�+' i' X11 3 em u+• o i $•P V o) id .. 1 Min i PA r 4.t „` 0 ad ta �+ ad 1 SSn u � t� ru t3s'w�i .-s i 9M bL'1• :whit N4 rig SAM IG r o nq �i rt lie . ggazm ## why 41AR Poor , . 7 b-Air f � or 'awb:a. ��o +' ii.2LLITSfi S'�. In iiT ..M! . i ,{g"w ■pppy L�� �yyyy���� H% uyyy..a y p ji's w`yg ` 3 a # t�ao Y� JEN _l ^ yE w.",.. �w up$ � $ �}►.'�., w-3 a 4 ts wea >. � Si. ;. $'i N 't.1 S w w ..Y$ Y s "/µ1gry yr-c' ter -� r• �. 1�y�Ax fii Rf jj�il�� Ry. A K yt g +"M hS w i �p� If , I— ii cw.. "1 VN �iJB {� �{iaW w \' g'a ■ �^ G 1gy !f qM� w Y , hit �w �g� rm , j d. I iS ����. n� y�r �.''^ .�-°°. w 6 ..�? ij y yw, °. N o-waY• It i KBi� ryL aN pL�� (•p..��'. E`r� VVk M ,, 3 1. —f �FI.� YMw 3iMyv �pppp -j is ` s+ Al TL Is ig�v vs .: 1 7$ � N � q. .zH law -1 a y�� rte ��� � �sT U.! �� � �;��_ N [ N N W. RV.,_ i�i Y wi:hrs a•n �p ql iw AF�kj.0� '�. .y e�. t yv2F� M�iA� 'W Nn0 ^Jw iw rc. Ls'�LL�"1 J., ?Ij w Ii���.{.A o O M N Nye ® Y.V+ VU'Y a IS a pa V N O ply _may y �°�s�� lS. pR.- '•� A1. �4M i1�'�. �,S�1-11 y.y.p,P is f gg y �r ,Yy N�Q w N Ew v1�K ip ir.+++r j Y s ti i�� rnq xq p 4 e£$ ti a p Y 1 ` �p �1 t23 d �bi Y.... r V K tl L �• y0. titN p ( 1� s Y {, _N yy ubX, t K `�`, K N «o y''� ^akN i YN 1B t.�.•t °t}� y.�c `•Y'6 w�M Y 1N ! �K IRK YFjp//pAJ =�fi... • N �. a 4 +�w�5j[ .0„J�l y,xcM RXr ��~ r NGL. /. MV^ WT.�Y WP °�MNy9a{ R. y P!JS JAI nfit aai3 �M$St�^Y� 0 tai 4 o +» IV Ez .64 t t N ^MC s Yyy p s yamy�{ �{NVA jib t � K tl fi' y► M Y j��/(It �1 M « St YY ^ ~ N C � P « =[! 1 By y #t 7f r O►r O y C >i Vila rs Y O MyMp f.W [in_, %ry w q d;- Ni N Y" tl zti Kv re wr gA9yl iIJY iO P• q Y V M K y e i !fM �g K W t. �4 �t � i{+ tl+`� tya� y.�. w N �r MQ ■�s] p LK �1 ai C = �p E an w A'y y At� ♦t� iY1. K Kam. xY �E L IL C4 11Wt� L.. aa•• w�iL1 tI EI 8 :n y`Y a K a+ � r t OZ gay may¢ � b 'a 3 SfiN iBN �" i il $' *" yM t.�,F a.. M �. �' � � }� ."'' f... -y N "�f y . �S 1. J7 rfF t � iYHi MS LV �1(i;J C �N y* f�YA � app `$y to M: QQ ^ai «I p��++ K..' Y� p�s fit ?i. H 4 W .1 . V NVX sip Nilso Met Yg� xy PO 0i�pjNN IV :•��L^�'� ff "YYL11a� adi S Ipz '" «+: i+ °' 4.:E.3 art Lu da M q ai i4 ® M tl4 Y. Iil 1.3 was FT a it lit 1. Mp eptl 11 V.S. I � y� 4. sfN. yy'� p " tp�i „! g� mod" ��. — - Is! Nat t,. 1, � N� rIN � C pp fppas yq H •�� N C, �.iN 'd 4L! N® � l y'p� 9ftlow Pow owity 4 N9j sew N��i.l ��� �dH L Mp.w i �!!�� �$Y (tom! 1[{�� q.� .. N� YQe . �._•._�N _ _.$ ., NQ+- Iµ[��_._._..�_ - ��I ...-.. _..: K cCy R °$ W Pal 4 40 sit " i sit! 'gbill! «+"i ,.. rr�1wyy r4. 6O�gCy1 WY gs \� q���1 •' �M1 � CIF 4 i��Y YL �G '/ mx1! B'C!itV YiT -'O 4I y t I tt w.. ,IM IIM� Si ft - M ' �Q.• :e p ?gel ,6« .a. l v�ral y Y we rw. .k tea+ 4. � .�{. �4. • L� I T �.�+, - '� M r 4M N it 5. y,r r a9 4 3 Rtm . � #� s3x ,�, • � � ` � 1 Eggs. CC+�i yy mgr S.g..a is Ya NSfg}•.� r a(�� N N _N �i+fb YYi liy. T�� RVITL .r i � u J n� M ti 14 1 ilk I Y M HY gWy. YfSol Ras uai i1 mY.r�ii w'e Nz.Iy�+� i'}"° :o_ + �, Y•...Yt rii,IS �w 'SIa n�� LS «.nix's 3�§ �Cw I $ yg g #I I I I qw "C Y M 4M '',.i � d6'�j NI' ��L f1. � 3 6KA���9P'0.x �1 • y ��:..Y Yea �Y � L�M�Y N SIT qq� Qlp w+ 'j.. SR g8 � f L Ts Z. MT I y OOO'aa qRI► vial �YS ^YYY � 4YYKi �`����1II yyY,, M. � °i � -�.� �M,1 . .•'�'tY y Tj Ct its � N�. i� `� � � �'� � Oro S ., r� ilk I Y M HY gWy. YfSol Ras uai i1 mY.r�ii w'e Nz.Iy�+� i'}"° :o_ + �, Y•...Yt rii,IS �w 'SIa n�� LS «.nix's 3�§ �Cw I $ yg g #I I I I 1 U. u1 3A111 11 11 qw "C Y M 4M RW 044.�1JL CIO$ �IYN�IyyI pY1 � L�M�Y N SIT qq� Qlp w+ SR g8 � f L 2'6 6 Y I y OOO'aa qRI► �1 yL4y µNO- 'a 74 C .y�'1��C°pp y Tj lFa® Y•yw., r� etOjl ~ - if ` ��. L ye 25 ■Y ■eP $» if O M� of Y�R 41 N "i.�r. N Y ✓ L 4p° Q. a ll w eejyyj��O e OL^�� 24 t,,.�pL1 or Qa� L =CqCyy�y Git QCy M� I 41�Si L/ Avow ♦ f. l E�} i 1 U. u1 3A111 11 11 GIM-9 I t c�l c— _ ..'Li "M (-� _ qw 044.�1JL :Y j ai-1 pY1 rA�y9• YICCCCi �` L�M�Y N SIT qq� Qlp w+ SR Mg SS R em R OOO'aa yL4y µNO- 'a 74 all .y�'1��C°pp irE u Tj lFa® Y•yw., .2 8= Ji O=y etOjl ~ y=%u if ` r 25 :.I � $» if ._� q L 4p° Q. a ll w eejyyj��O e OL^�� 24 t,,.�pL1 or Qa� L =CqCyy�y Git QCy M� I 41�Si L/ 1A fLw R► C. GtaYi GIM-9 I t c�l c— _ ..'Li "M (-� _ FUf S $g� uy _ R - day �NY� Yai � pG e G O ,4 yAZi .s N L G O Mq�Yr�,, Aµ �^' N 9 i� ^O o v N fie GAO A 16. 614.� 1.r l 1� 1 L � tai Y N� 4r 44 " f N/ s a- g O is v. JNE war g �gE ..'� arms v; FUf S $g� uy _ R - day �NY� Yai � pG e G O ,4 yAZi .s N L G O Mq�Yr�,, Aµ �^' N 9 i� ^O o v N fie GAO A 16. 614.� 1.r l 1� 1 � tai Y a 4 1 N/ g �gE v; Y Y�g. 4�bt ` pp 4.rUi' M Mqp N,� sG.Y. aQ ytyy. 9Y 41 DATE: TO: FROM: 8X: SUBJECT: V,Trr�r�Act` Rt3t�i�i�4 1�.+� y po lurch 9, 1988 ChdiMan and Members of the Planning Comisr ion Brad Boller, City planner Debra Meier, ASAOclate Planner Me ca ce r er ca iri `""off . ti a +re a€r n a a 9 39,938 square foot ambulatory health Car \facility and 82,932 square. feet of med #cal offices an ii- ,40res of land iii the mixed Use (mm) District within the ta. a Vista Planned-Community, riity, located at the south€�ast 44), er of Milliken Avenue and Church Street - APR E47� -281' }� Ilnd 14. 9. sf; X. PROJECT A99 SITE DESCRiPTi4ii: A_ Action Requested: Approval of Site Plan, Grading Plan, are scape an "Elevations, projeht phasing and issuance of a Negative Declaration. 8. I Surroundin Land Use -and "ruin : or aP' cae `3.aE se aria site South - Vacant Lana; -Aixed Us c (Mill) District within the Tema Vista COM unity Irian East - Vacant Lana; nixes Ise tiSHO3 Di m „i t with,..., the r Terra Vista Commutti wy Plan West - Vacant Land; Mixed Use (WC) District within the Terra Vista Cetnity Plan C. General Plan Desi nations= +� d. e - '`at"Resfidential (8-14 dwelling units per et North 4 Low - Medium Resi:cent#al (448 4wel ling units per acre) South Medium - Rez dentiatl (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medi= Residential {8 14 dwelling units per ACre1 )test - M00um'Resideritial (8-14 dwelling units per acre) U, Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant with a ra �tra pers en s *Pe from north to se nth. The existing Eucalyptus rats near the hest site boundary has previously been alp +oved for r oval in connection with the *rnstructj�on of Aiill #key Avenua between Hountain View Drive »nd l:aotFril t Boulevard. Na other significant plants or animals exist on the situ. ITEM F PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT _ DR__8tk-9,-1-988 nl .t.fi0- _494i1_sut t{�ryrxaau air? . i!#S€�IIA4 - March Page 2 E. Parkins Calculations; Number of Number of Type Sgiare parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Patio Re.. Qufred Provided Medical. Office 122,870 1/200 615 616 F. Applicable Regulations: rn iMedical facility is located I tI the nor ies portionn- of a designated [� within th�y ,.b;iock Terra Vista Community Plan. , %is district it intent.�d to be,4 mixed use area comgsrised of th - t�ryspital facilities and of�e and cnmr�ercial uses related to tf�le medical center. 11. ANALIS:, A_ - Gene"-!: Tie area mastery plan of this block included in the p a-T package is intended for reference only - We are not considering a Master plan approval with the medical facility application. The master ,plan is provided to, indicate thot shared access as well as\.pedestrian and vehicular girculation are intended to be "tegra�ed with the medical facilahy and the overall site. The medical facility site plan will be built in two (2) phases. Phase One will include the basic ambulatory care center and one physician's office tourer, parking to accommodate this phase and major site monuw"entation. PhasC Two will include:.wo areas of expansion of the ambulatory care center and an additional physician's tower and expansion of the parking area. The site desigri includes an outdoor extension of the dining-;area an the south side of the east -w€st oriented office tom;, The patio includes decorative hardscapa, seating and accent`` andscaping for shade tld aesthetic enjoyment. Architc. tuTally, the project is located on a site that poses -, some interesting challenges. First, it is adjacent to parcels` that are intended for multi- fmmily residential development and must respect the residential character of these protects. Secondly, the project is part of an overall mixed use i4rcel intended for commercial /office development expected to occur within 2 and 3 story structures. Third, it is in a tremsition 1 zone from the higher intensity office uses along Foothill Boulevard and the residential areas within the 'terra Vista Community, as well as being visible fromt Foothill Boulevard. The applicant has strived to meet-these goals with the building design proposed. The basic building matoial is stucco accented by tinted grass and j standing seamy metal roof at the main entrance. Thw ptr c urem are setbac �!n ,ts3, of ltO0 fie t f time sir et o ede�strfansa and 6AorrTs s the�skreet� 6v over ee r n ate es �i �a PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-01 - SAN MTC 1IO COMMMITY - HUSPITAI March 9, 1988 Page 3 Profile of the facility <Ithe ambulatory care cener) is oriented to thc, north which is in-closest proximity to the residential uses, while the office, towers are oriented south and east t rd Fosthill and the outer office and comerEJal offices. souther exposure of the office towers disp ay iaMer AMOVEltc of the tinted glass to reflect the iwore D saphistitated - character of foothill C,,ulevurd. ? B. Design �i�Wii<teez _ The CoWittee (McNiel, Tolstoy, o eman ey a pr ec -on Fe_�ruary 18, 1999. The Committee made tht following comments end recommendations with respect to #e project: 1. <Final design of themanumentation /plaza at Ohuro- and Milliken shall be subject- to Design Review Committee approval prior to approval . of Landscape /Irrigation Plans. -AI 2. The metal roof screen shall be painted to match the building false. 3. fycreening of the CT Scanner and the MRI shall be accomplished through using a combination of berms, landscaping and a decorative fence /wall The screening should completely hide, the mobif� units from public view, 4. The parking along the north face of the phase One' =- _ Physicians Office Building should be ,eliminated (except" the hat�siicap spaces) to allow "sufficient area for lan .Gaping along the-building- face. The handicap pari,ing spaces on either side of the entry should,,,--Iii expo-sed aggregate concrete surface with�(a broom finish band to reflect an expansion of �te entry courtyard. In addition, the Committee discussed a desire to provide art " overhead canopy across one of th-,jertry drive aisles to provide greater protection to patients and handicapped persons on rainy days. Staff had a follow -up discussion with the Foothill Fire District and it seems that their need to circulate around the s drive aisles precludes the possibility of extended overhead canopies. The entry canopies will project from tho, bui dL;ng face to the curb only and will not extend over Vhe drive aisle. The Committee recommended approval of the _�pproject and the MWEtee coalmen ave en fic tided ass .o4 1tiorss or app` -" rovar in the aticacned Resolution. ii •� 1'i R A MIRO C lISa1ON STAFF REPORT OR 88-01 - SAN A* ONTO CAN! Y' HOSPiTA , �farcir=-S =163 m - Page a C. Technical Review Committee:. The Technical RevieK. Comi`�ee reviewed e p ec. on a ruary 16, 1988 and dde�.,Ilrmtned that with the attach�ci special conditions and mommonced standard conditions of approval, the project is consistent with applicable standards and ardina_ices. O. Environmental Assessmnt: 'Upon reviev of Part I of the Initial u y and c e on of'°Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has round no significant impacts related; to the develops �t of the proposed medical facility. o III. FXTS FOa FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the objectivas oT tne 6enerll Flan and is in accordance with the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community plan. In addition, the proposed use, together with recommended conditions will not be Aetrimental to the public health safety or weldare, or materially injurious to r- operties or' Improvements in the vicinity - r will it cause significant environmental its. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: tae to the significance of t4,p oposed far,itity spa "ed`tee�ned That it was ckesirable tr- adverbs "e a Notice of Public Hearing f�t� this Developm -%t Review application (Development Code %4ion 1.7.02.1108 ). Based on,that determination, this project nos been advertised as a pub's h6141ig in The Wily Report newspaper and notices have been posted in proximity, to e,, -pr ec- site. V. Staff fec' ds appr�-val of Development Review Mon of the attached Resolution and issuance of a city P1aPler BB:DM:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilizatic Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Referonce Exhibit "C" - Phase One Site 'Plan Exhibit 'O■ n Phase Two Siti Plan Exhibit "E" - Proposed Planting List Exhibit "F�.- Landscape 'Plan, Phase One Exhithit % "'�'* Landscape Plan, Phase Two s Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Exhibit "K" Exhibit "L" Landscape Det *il - Borth Entry Lanosp{aik Oot4il - South Entry J Building Elevations Site Cross Sections Description of, Use u YO \ ,.P" rra�.. ���'� �_��.�,,,,.�..- �- •+'''°`� -3`�� ��cn+ WIN 7FIf i!� �� (ynl�• � *41 pjhm S� • _ +� jai ;i�, � � "� � TA, � � tt �� t4 � � tw�ci+a. w�aeY'ia°� t wl t i�iM lltp � �Rlli .� S' i r t u ..., I OF ITEM. RP �sNILNG 1 v it �a. 1 p rLr�`> �•,r _ � y s 7 may, �tLL • 41M � �.yjrp It i i 7 • `MTH CITY (IF f, ; RANCHO C CLUANJaXGA K-tt • s r_ •• �\ d i t t LL- +b.11 ♦ ( Ire a= f - '~ 4 't {�4Y.M/f. a -- 1 w�KigMrw m�eru alsactt � �� - �'�''��1'i =---= t",•`:_. r 2 l ' . z r '3N i�aitx silR`.iT AllhkO 5 17 <yC ..�Y �. .•'4 .R/Y�I . 4Y'i�CiSE ............. 1i t:*[q.at 1I CITY CF CA CITA F '"k� TITLE, D(V xN- EX .;SALE: J v KANTNG UST - .. vote ly"MOLA wal-WGALMAMRIh CGMMOM MAMI} IMtt RAUMiMA VAAMflATA mods MOlif OACxIO 4Rtt oS 41AL SIMMAl"UM CAMOtlNRA.. CA.PH"'T71a/ tf,;AL COfOf MLW'WfA �9URRM AALM MUA Y rT SHOWN YRtMeM - G° �a+lfwl'A.YFf" C1101"MORA ' LRMON KtMT[Q`illll KOAL �\ - /S MG R1KUit.FTU$CAMALIMLfMSol :R894UM �(ofUly{�TtIkA,R�AMIMTA CIRM[1A FWSIf T'1ar 11 SAL a rY iM1ORARTROL:MUA liE01 CJ.. Mt.YM ORIFNS,LAYMLa AA. SAL /'`'� t� � 7 s.NImmm"* Sk*"Oetw wALt AL" - VURRUNQT filers. f^ L 3 i �' NfOw"*LTAww* *W"I* hot" 1119ALSTAMWRa `- `M +y, cAMarnat soa 4um*Y mvws aC7 1 e RAt - ���yL MIW~' &LRMlARA - P. FLCVi1RO0 SLAW i I L Low SAAMIIRIL► , . J6'tf MAfYtlRSt'QtR4. Ji17lC.1YA. US AGAR CAN SIALW APRO17TL}af1t O''TRIRfR OW&A 0 awrAl... ARC40TH*44. fALaRSJL^ CAM 1691F I/LATS * 6 R;tAMA SPLlw1fRS TSLUMS- ORAN"o )PLATS r Ilm'UM W`LJR irli�liRli IMINSIVT - FLATS f iv i+tNTl�lO.fwrAmm LILT DF TMf MILE 1 DAL StUC -1RUT- 11"Ou ,,Al iILSA 11113 PO.CA /YMRf -MMTRR %4AL WSl; ,. CQtO 16A4 4 c7� ,1 MKTfADCALLAli IULYA _ 1;DAV -. .. . ` JUMIRRRUS DWAAF T'YIPRl SDAL I. LJIMTAMA '- DWARF i !AL PPHMM�f�GOMRpTKA _�MfAVaMLY NYCwFO SEAL . ' MRR /UM aL1AMOtR "T111 1 `.\\ SSAL fITTOfFDRUM IDRMAVAMOGATA VAINRSA4RLt }K/CILrIRAMff SRAL �Mi[ 0411" AOH'LRA TSNRA LIN1tLIM 11"1142R2 m04x OR �\ t GAL y % MIMRlLSR! AwRlu� K1At LADY S SAL *APNMLTMS INOMCA CMMN+ITNM1 \� \� L*A4. f,l .. _ 4I LORgRNUr 3AlLRMWfaS STAR JAS"" LSAL VIMS INSPORMA V"KACffA- 4&%'TSYYOMA LAVfIM!!R TSIAAF6T VIR7 1:6AL. 4RUMAXVALLSA MIRfDC6LOR /.. " : f"L SMA pULlM O"NO4MM PAR VM46 1 OAL. LAM - TALL. P204 RI - ARwUAL R7R � "vanotYS 1. . `tlL.JlM IR CjFrV OF' IV A I" ..- � 1 :w J 6wT, 1 TG.Y6 TITLE s j. y 'L M� kIa ,,ALES' EXHiBM SCALE - 1. M- t, I srn.uswer aiawwaxt� �w 1 'akplirriMr �� �.., - .- +rwrtcwl. • hp '� f � ��� '* 1�/twR0 �VY1�lY v a j CITYICV- *ANC CUC-kvKXNGA TITLE.*. F. r; era.rlgry� r .,. 'omit ZEVAT109 (V** roar*OAWA Rta T � L r ,' 1+4k1nA ,r �.� ..,.w..�..�.�.� Ixld llxki�b�k.�xwuMYrVV•11 +. --..� -ten. ..�...� �,� � \r. I{ EMT R£8VA:M ' �... aa..s 4. 1 1 • '1JlFe1Y. \ % �i.M.�Y1 t.�- .•,.� -, • 9Nk Y. Y FhkClyk ' �f �� �. •` n _. _ .._.. _ �.�.�..n.��.._ Flx'eA•xiRYf ■faflFFFI ii ltrimlcEVfltioN i 4E Rte, i x� j �osY � F� � f ♦- � r.. .�. .� 1 � F �� f Y. E87 @.IYAICIFSt'1Y'NIlgYMLIQb1A1V �' S '_ � e F _ mat.twrnr�eaxr ►Ftr µ _ � k.iFx+ai .�- ....,..— r u�wk,ww � i CITY OF rum. _ i `T r ;-x �y k ,.,s �... s. LA t�' �• �r�rfi 7y�;;r`i.? � ..r.w . � . � w.e..w. r � s±emNwraes+m.- ;�.c.beoi+uuwasr w q. crrwrwur'i_ta�e. "ar"'�,.� >�,F— _. j.l sw�ebHrtic+a{1'pyee. Y t �� • — _ { e.'aMSdareaa�ac.Jrn u.a � f�� �. CITY +OF LE- i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY San Antonio Condnunity Hospital, the primary provider of health care services in the upland and Rancho Cucaiaoiga area, is pro- ceeding with plans for the development of a major health care facility located In Rancho Cucamonga, California. The facility represents the latest state- of-the -part thinking in how high quality health care services will be provided cost, effectively to new and growing communities for the balance of this century anti into the next. The faci3.-ity, to be named Rancho San Antonio 1` ;- Medie:al Center, isttte cul:iinat4n of efforts between Lewis Homes and San Antonio CCZ;nitf'Hospit!\l. The site aelecte for the facility was determined after exhaus- tive research which included physician practice analy ".s and considerable consumer --surveys of citizensn Rancho Cucamongal asking them of their specific health care needs and desires. Je Church Street and Milliken Ucation of the facility �(s determined based upon citizen desires for having convenient quality primary health care services close to home. Milliken aq� Church intersections represents the Center for popuiat , development in Rancho Cucamonga for the balance of this cenry and will be within ten minutes driving._t�pe fcw the new citi ens who will domicile on Rancho Cucamonga and in ,western Fontana. The site selected at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and a Church Street is approximately 10 acres. First phase of the development will include a 44,000 sq. ft. physicians' 'office building attached to a 25,000 sq. ft. ambulatory health care services facility. The architectural design of these buildings will blend naturally with the neighborhood charaal,-er. Extensive landscaping will be utilized to create a park -Dice setting for 1 the medical campu_. The physicians' office buildieng will be the permanent residence of approximately 30 high - quality primary care physicians, all with privileges to practice medicine at San Antonio Community Hospital, the area's highest quality medical facility. The ambulatory medical plaza will feature a varieti of consumer demanded services including emergency services, .staffed with hi# quality emergency trained physicians; holding beds to allow patients to stay for a short time for observation purposes precluding immediate admission to an area hospital; an ambulance staffed_�by paramedics, to assure quick response for Ranches Cucamonga /Fontana citizens and for patient transfers to impatient facilities when required; advanced, high technology imaging ` services including radiography, flouroscopy, ultrasound, CT 56 nn ng, mazrographyr for diagnosis of xauscular' skeleton in ties and dzeez ses t as lab6tattiry as an extension of the 'San J Ant is < - r: .4tdty Hospital laboratory for co aplete dlagnooltic �.�;= path cgyf an out- patient surgery facility for minor surgical _ ` procedures for patients who go home the same daye a sports medicine and physical therapy program for the ttreatment 4f sports related injuries; and a comprehensive education center providing o . the citizens of _ Rancho Cucamonga with the rpprartunity* to learn ways. in tfi'ch to maintain good i;aalth�- avoid future ailments. These services will be housed in a vory attt;rac,�)�v,efi warm, and l consumer friendly facility, very unlike, many of a,oday$s star le looking hospitals. i To allow for fu ure co gumer demondr, ties sits has been'planwad to = allow for the development of a ;Phase I$.`evelopment which Could be �,'nclusivb of an additional 44,CDQ•" ft,, physicians' -office - building and expansion of the ambu�'t ory''hea7;th care services by an additional 14,oOQ sq. ft. The t ads in health service `,Ovel -� opment in this , country are for ..sac health care, services,- ;�* be performed out of a hospital An- patient ssetti,ag and in an ambula- tory setting. This facility has began --designed fora one, growth of population in Rancho Cucamonga through the .balance of this i F century and into the next, and secondly to tak acdv�antage of the new trends in technological` advaz�ceriaen and i; Ong these flattest o technologies to the citizens of Rancho Cucamo�O in a state -of- the -art: facility. , C J AN Ms.; Debra l��ier City of Raur.lw Cuc iurr aga P.O. Box $07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ,1 San Antonio Coramunity Hospital Dear Ms. Meier; In respons a to your letter of January 22, ` 1988. c} am pl+ "Wt to offer the following information as requested. kacilit? when it is' full ' oP*Mtion. Mat of these! emplopsea Appro*Aately 77 us will be employed ai. the Ambulatory �auld present auxin sae day shift.., During the start -up poriod, tjii' staffing lev - bably be ablaut 40. When fully occupied, the Physidanl Office Hui ding will have `about 80 -1 physicians and 90 support stem'- ' rill occila[uacy may tape two ;'or tip peas and the number ,yf person8 " present will be iirectlp pro;aor�nal to the occupancy. This w ill also be a daytime op4 hztion. Hours of the operation of the Ambulatc.;y Care Facility will be +6.00 a.m. to 8:00 `,p.m., u seven days a week. = ,he Physicians Office Building will probably operate 'rom 8:00 a.m. tci 6;00 p,m., Monday, through Friday. Saturday and Sunday will be covered by a reduced. staff and outpatient surgery will not be open. if dema::d requires 'additional services, the hours of tl:e Ambulatory Care Facility, can be empan, d to is coven later evening hours. ,it is unlikely that the Physicians Office Building YAU be i'pperating on the weekends, although some physicians Zay open part days on Saturday and come in for emerpney purposes as needed. _ The facility has no holding beds of the type associated witb hospitals. Any holding beds indicated on the plan ox in the prograt refer to observation Beds in the urgent care area ,or prey *ost operative k eds in" the outpatient surgery. , No patients, win be kept ovei� ght. if extended hospitelization is required, such patients tired` be transported to San Antonio Community Hospttel, Phase 11 construction is not expected for three or more years. The exi;nnsior for the Ambulatory Care Facility and the Physicians Office Building may occur at IVerent times. ID t 929 Sall arnarC.I: AAno „/"�( ApPrnJ:dytste lcmtCemmLncxr�rs Sc'e5,a._r p r e , Fabruaxy s"1988 Page T�no V If YOU rt.qube any further? information, please do not hesitate to eta � or telephone me directly. r/ i7onalrl' l;err�san�i- �i� Pree3.�nt General SarvlosslPlAnning kiBiltd W. Ronald Sackett, SACH `r George Kixy&en3all, ! SACH Tntegreted Medical Ci=pus ltochlin Baran & Balbona I F - I r; r., �_j � RESOLUTION RM, F lei A RESOLUTION OF THE RANGH6 CUCAMMGA PLA mIWl cMISSIOi! APPROVING DEVELOPLT REVIEW NO.' 88-01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEDICAL CENtjt� CONSISTING, OF A 39,938 SQUARE FOOT AMBULATORY HEALTH CARE FACILITY AND 89,932 SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL OFFIh�,ES CSR IQ; ACRES (f -LAND INa Ti#� MIXED 1iSi: (MiitD4- OISTitICT ii THIk T 7ERR 4XStA PLANNM ' CORMITY LOCATED AT THE SOU 'fFiE7 i Pt NER . OF MILLIKEN6 - _�I RUE AND CFaiRCH STREET - APR*. 227 »1�. 13 AiXi 14 ti a, A. Recitals. V r.r �l (I) San Antonio Communit y Hospital' has filed an application for the approval of Development Review 96 88.01 as descr)ibed,in the tithe of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thin Res�zution^ the subJect-Development Ruview �r request ls, referred "to as "51 m application"� (ita On the Dth of March . 1988, he .Planning Commission of the City of Rancher Cuamo angs Conducted a eting on the application an4 concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal pretr risites tq 2he ado g, Hof this kesolutin�' .j have occurre�d. rrt.. B. Resolution. �! Now, THEREFORE, it U herft found, 0'to utined and resolved by., the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonge as follows: 'This Commission hereby. specifically finds that all`; the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pal" t At of this Resol ut gn are .true and" correct. 2. Based upon subatantyi�'j evidence presented to this ConmlissIgn during the above- rfareneed meeting 0. March 9, 1988, including written and oral staff repo~rts _VIS Co.k'Assion hereby specifically finds as follows: (l `~ 3hb application applies to an irregularly shaped parcel locate,'at Oe southeast corner of Milliken Avenue aP Church, Streit vrith a street frontage of-, S56 feet along Church Street a6 40 feet alat�_g i�i1 iKe� Avenue and is projently Unimproved, and (b) The proYosed medical facility, consistin# of the ambulatory--care center and the physician, offices, ; s located on a portion of a b%4k 11esl9nated MHO within the Terra Vista Cor 11,k Plan, The MD3a -gone is Intended to be a mixed use area comprised of mediW facilities rind related office and cammereiaVilses and t-01 SAN MTON10 COW)tITy HoSplTAL �77 V page Z ArChjteCtUrQjY,7�"tbe facility is dLj,-'4jqned to be. a trans'l 0.01T between the residential uses to the north and the Office/ uxes�,� to t , �ha South along poot.hill 1*0ulevard, Tat basic building JW-eriAl IS Stucco, accented with the use,ot 1,�jnted 'glass and starldi q sem metal roof at�:the Si4in"entrances* 7h*:StrWtq06s bre�-setback in ekcassnbf 100 -feet fro%'Ue street S�,. is-, not to Impos#-, tfie $1j,!t VnI61:410 of the Projs,,ct on the str(t�t5�4; 7.) The lowat profile ttiuctur_o 1_"rrienfe0--no the r,"SidentfAl 4�'*fs_ WhIle the nUj,tj_j'tory7�,d�"erj_eS ,,, rtherly toward are ated south and Zoward//FOothill and,,ithe office and caw-cfa) Nrt. The southern,-, exp6sure Of "the'Office towers 0splay Urger , I tj t-ed iho n glass, t Vaflect the wre sophisticated char;Acter of Foothill Boulevo to t�qix COW ng ind u 3*1 Based upo'n tho substantial evi Won fluvi or, + It !�findfnqi of facts et �Ofth f�' Paragraph 'I and,t Z abv�,O, PtWhC bereby finds And concludes as follows: (a) Tnc;t the rj"'Aposed psodect Is Consiste t with the OL-4115AYes of the General plan; and" !h proposed ase js�,',Jn accord with the 0 of the ettl 4 `2b`4 cl terra vft�.,* Comftfty� Map , Ot '07V ment 4) , and tW' rurposes;��Of the t dis in VIhich site: is located$, �7d (C) That 00 proposed- use is in coo 4:v;e with each of the applicable provisions,of lt��,�Terrzj Vista Cmaunity, Plar, and Develo nt, hat tht proposed ute,, toge (4) T, _ther wi�Z Ihe AdIflons Apptic4ble will no. be detrimental to the Public tjalth, Seitz ror welfare, .-Ir uterta7ly Injurftus to prpper*�j or improvements In the vicinity. 4. This Comissich' hereby finds Oe pro3tct �As been reviewed and... considered in co"pliance or a Envirown't'al with the r�ilif Qual i ty Act of 1470 and, furth�r, this Cowssio �reby i1sues A� Nogapive Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and Cor,-�usions set forth in Paragraph 2 and 3 above, this Comitsion hereby apprOves thq application subdect to each and every condition set forth below and r� the attached Standard C00ditions tttached hereto and incorporated herein by this reF6,reftce. �15 planning DIvision 0 design of the montr�-antaticqplpqa at Church `ItrtO� and Milliken Ave6ui- shzi-.J�, 60 subj4dt .to 1 Of tbO Design Revlew (,-�aftta# prior to oving the Landscape/Irrigati" plitns� Nl.A6lNIWI COWISSIOW AESQLUTIVJ No. Kist?i y March 9, 198% _ AL Page 4 , o _ + ;? J Thh ��� Willh s roof � ) hall be painted to match the 1) bun 13Tntat g face. 0i Screen91g, of the CT ;scanner arok the MRI snail be accomplished .,through using a co ination of berms, /t landscaping, and a decorptive . fRfte, or , vall The screening shall completely hides` the txitQ units from- #r. to � pub ,,rier� .htr $ faction of the City ; �'� <) a �'� (4) The pedestrian walkways throughoui� the ' project shall be rxposcd ,agggregate with smooth finish b ,ind y!Patterns inc lu I nj walk,"' acros,i dries aislssr> (5) The handicap parking paces on either side of the, 'entry, should be an exposed aggregate finish ' with6 _ �ot�_ ',)band concrete patterns to „effect (tn ,expanaim; of the,, entry courtyard. _ Engineering Division (I) 1 The., "protected" bits bay on, Church Street shall bG relocated' easterly outside of the curb- turn tare) _ to the satisfaction of the�Ci�y Engineer. „ N%` (2), -Pte median Island break &Tong Churett Street shall be , designed and constructed with an esrstbound left turn pocket. -� (3) The project,)is to drain to the currently uniprovei� J Dory t-4ek Channel; thi(refore, ° no construction, �� building ar grading pdritits shall -;* issued, until - � the Terra Vista Master plan Storm Drain Line S is constructed concurrently with„ phase III of the Day Creek Channel or an alternate <draintge disposal 1 system is provided to the of of the City Engineer,. r (4) The follfting streets' shall be constructed ,,full width ,far the stated limits except ,t at offsite J partway .- tuprovements may be deferred until developwil of V<e adjacent property; (a) Milliken Avenue' from Mass Line Road\ to Foot#lll' Boulevard I f6cl:uding landscaped median, and (u) Church Street frosa Milliken venue to the east property boundary including landscaped O i J n u PtyC'MG CCOWIS §§ ON, �1`EMUTI No. OR 88.01 -_SAM /W ON110 COMMifMITY HOSPITAL -- _ Page 4 Vr, ireffic signal shall be constructed at the Williken Avenue-and Foo Oj Boulevard intersection Q prirlr to opening the. , no leg to traffic. The des'tgr, and constrAk#ion cast A&II be eligible for credit against the Developer's System Devolopment Foe .,) if so ap`oroved by the City Council, ; 6.. me Deputy Secretary to this Cowrlssioc s1hall certify to tFe ? adoption of ttgs Resolutions L�F w APPRdVEM AM ADORTE[i JMIS 9l E DAY OF MARC14, 'l," MB PLANNING CQSION OF THE CI; OF RANCHO CUC410" c BYE r n ` ` Carry T. WWI. a reran - "'..""" / ATTEST. rau But TV, WRY Wretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning CoWssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,'do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutior; was duly and- regularly introdctced;o passed, and adopted by „the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning CowAission held on the 9th day of PArch, 1988, by, the following vat -to -wit: AYES: COWISSIOMERS: MUS: Cowfssiows: ` ABSENT., COMMISSIOMEERS: `J 61 Cj r ` 0 _ l QA `��Y GY9 Y1►�� M a` a . zgrag r � a v T _ r j fr wV« +�iy«Op. _ 00 _ Q 1 P 7i� s. e yp Pit s4.. a..2 w «11 M: O « H � 1 f! jiv It X-9 41 His gg Y • ,'1 ya�.N .� i7S �1� fr.l4Y1Cii� "yZ neIt 00 C6 � w l+ 11 �1 21 Po 321 Ism b 9k JIB -f2 Y e x u S _ �= r My a�'�'.Ry gam S gr' vi _. an N3S=�_ « k •-7s ' Mr k list is v lax. I �T Y` 'Al a ps ��= _ rY�� Z. 41B, I APE w �4jgo C i i ',iii , i Sri RAR �R it CIS asi �C yy M4 Y M,v. � pW a Y w V ` Ogg jj et= ji r �r , Nit, u x V x gjg t y�YP ArQ� 6 OYO1I MF O aff {\ . I 6 N.ii N 9� K V C••F hi�� wE ���''' q y 4 �Ny feQ yr{ M tJ i•{y�y r O O w r_ p P 4 1Y % C V ii, iM1 ® C O va 'y 6tl#r s S H! 08`00` «._�,""L'aa s J. ._ flilb ji .mr g a R6 sS'm. y ^ ^':, rc1Yl�✓ `�i 31 °}eR';a,4•�a Pea p.N LL OOp eM yyY p: ^p "T+GOOppHY }yA �pL p41 LYM MS rM Mq y +.►Yn rN+NM91 }y� A 3 NI « `6eC. Tr¢ wM 6ia"7' a''* =T ores S�V� X�gvti���N$�f. il.� } is t 1 ^� N }Ir gLFMN �i N`�.•� ���Mf) �. �J••� 49 a C M yrj q^ 'N i°i i+ O o 5+ 00. O 3 S , epiY$L �TO•Y 4Q,N 'a•!'N ^ g�►i�� - .pp 3 ��•! Q .t � � }°�(!� •. Cs � �. yO1 y� � L � CO � O» _ "7000 ` �.. 1� ,� M r+'.C•M +yW f. �I PR' � � a .s 1CiV Y��iu 8 ^o..yei� sli is 21 j M n 11. $S eZe• r �1 ypHl cpL a r ®1 GI % e �• 3i b per r C y� 11Q}� V �+ y �' 4 �,gs. hi _ ce. O Ss u e r s N�e mad s _ it jsl- $$ o'nr $F� C } L II N - Q NAs �a$ �qv .Qgq�e P.}},-��' �i7�ia .Y{•�Y yap ��$TuG6•'g. +w� ����j}S Q �� NTa y'�•T iwyL� '�0 a-ij A^ 'O ►eN µ N all y�y qy .L� �1 y_ Q��41 Sy1 YyYY'y LNq• �Y � y }'p =NON =lG� Q L% p 1. 41 L; � �� L ��� $$ Aag r. �:•t�° y ,� a .rw .ca ^"i Y.'$ �all '�c �_sai«Lo q Y � � � ^ y qp EE 6 i R� � r.•7 i6tlq ,p i/ j q lr 1"w31 �WV tt p �� N i Ls1 �1 4 OL. fL+Y6� t .. ^��� r�fyR �tl�- M �� 6i��L14 w yr}FY¢ M�py.�w6 R�L .i(.$. N e <`w s �' 7� l Y L a i• .YL Y:O e.L', " }�. 71 +y?Z =yay u wx �. � K 1"CkN iV iQ i- H PiN �r W i LLi NSM° ~� S w , 6 n V rr�y (�L w r�M � pay R gib; Sgt RKL +p Y.`t,S°$ll CdYri., 15•, �Y A�.q�,'.Y.R M.. �q Y N w w = f flit ;$l va Rai , > ;s �, L r ryyyG 0 2,4F ts: gill ~i � v Oil 1y , 9 Nom. l N BEM U_�V �l. �n� NrIY y`c��'• Cr Y C uNY Qi'�AC �. 10. ��w°ii M.N 16 ,S��S ��w ��.�ip.,� ACC. qY, 1C V 1 431-3 A -Ir IIFF77:: q� yF� ti. A GP �d V CIS ZM • vY.Aw�+t ♦ �n. yoYµ4 4 h�� �4�1 ?y4P4 tlY`� pp,tif Y it Y V.:.w'�@t 1 It P~ w Y 6. G OYi6. It a V NPO 27 2 izxa I t7 1 2T,s gas, IL U Is » rm..� " LT.. `$` $ �r� �a� i »^ �"3' 'limp b a • M 'w w wit t R � Lal +4 - 11 1 is 1XV1 am r fi 'O wi S a. Tk if1^� N O a' 'p�0 YID M. 8 .woo 6 � O 4 6' a1 `m� f■ w L L � v we.a— ap � ayL ~ W N. a 11 C L' � M K (r L C 4 b �i' W 12.* Lar.Ct L M ^44 r t e ! i .. p• y V 'Y�� q S{ Ulf - µs y NRI N i p � d � � �� ,•.t. Y r � i t f � �� i• Y��Y Y� �� � ��R 44C GyL - +y La �Y N . r .a k - �� f wt Is L IM YY.Yt O QQL is N '! M�P 4CiM �bwi•. M '�� }Li M * �rY s1 N w JC'�1 . O 4 At � w fiNU r- � a ,4 Y ss vY 34 7i..aA ny � rs Y A 9 V rr go S iii L tom^` r it W! Yw a}YyW Y -Cp �.. gl�. yNy C V � L IM YY.Yt O QQL is N '! M�P 4CiM �bwi•. M '�� }Li M * �rY s1 N w JC'�1 . O 4 At � w fiNU r- � a ,4 wow gel td • Oyu � _:'... .. ^ � .. _ M •... S Z s„ �,r, t 4� �r•4 I .— lig � ,nYw .N. v q 4It 9�V�,..,q. Y �.Y� •e yY� 4 pr'N e4 at 'I \` i� �S« "��.,� .� �Y� a �►a c «� ilk ;x i Pal y', y$y.o «mot[ a = "� '�R(•,� A A. �� ✓: _. _ NY • ^" V. fix ? yi t. 4f Or L C N NL1Y• i�wk ra#i1 i1 �' 4■ �yi000 r SAE -3 4 7,7 1.2 4s qT R z Mll Y # L�. C y+� Y M I _ N c - CITY OF RA?kHO CUC,A,MONGA a STA, REPORT . _ _ . C (\ DATE: March 9, 1%8 TO: Chi man and Merbi s of the Planning Cc#mission II ,� FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Dior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa °Jr., Associat- 'Civil Engimier 10JECT: EKVIRO?I . TAL ASSESSME4, AND` TEKTATIVE' PARCEL MP 11341 - LEWIS E - s v s on,: of :. acres of an, (Into _ I'pkvice Terra. vitta; Planned Ccuamunity, located at the southeast corner of` Church street), and Milliken---., Avenue. (APN 227>151.13t14) a Rof. LIR 3801) a _ I. PROJECT AND; SITE DESCRI!XIA: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Proposed Tenta,viia Parcel Map ash, shown on. Exhibit B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 11.61 Acres C. Exis'z,n Zon -n l NO - ,-Hospital D. Surroundinj_ and User. North - Vacant,, CI South vacant East Vacant West - Vacant t E. Surrounding General Plan and Aevel0ment Code Designations: [ North Park' Site - planned Ce,,4munity - South - Medi6 Office Planned Community East Medical Office /Co�oer -tial - Planne_Ut -om mupity �- Re�.,iential (Hid Density) - Planned Community -lest ,' ,; PLANNING C"MION STAR ROORT E1 PARCEL P '13a't41 } LEWIS DIV, Chi ` , .., �I MARCH � ' _ � -,'�� PAGE 2 F Site Characteristics: o sawite is vacant with the land sloping app ra'xi eteiy t6" ' II. ANALYSIS; The purpose of the Parcel Map is to create a Tat for the 7 eve opm lit of a me'Oical complex, also on �Onigbtls agenda as DR 58-01s Milliken Avenue is raquirtd 1oobe construe* d full width tromOFoothill Boulevard tq Base t 4pe Road upon recordation of the Filial Map., ,Parcel, = Church Strait is rOuired to be constructed full width atong, the map` fr�ntap upon development. G III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The' appl,tcaht�orwileted Part 'I of VA Initial � u a Cori tad' a field inves{igati"d com °toted itrt II of the Initial Study. -No adverse impacts upon the anvirw"nt are anticipated as a result of this.-,project. Therefore,,issuAnce of Negntfve Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE• Notices oi" Public Nearing have,been seilt to —yam ' " .,rounding proper owners and °placed in he Daily Report newspaper, Posh 'fig at the site has also betty co feted. ` v, RECOe9MENDATION: It„ is rpen O"Jann rig Cows -Blinn consider atT inpu an +:ten�ents of the -iid4tiVO Parcel Map. if after {�s4 consideration, the COMIy lion Can recommerd approval, then the adopti of the attagbed Resolution and , issuance of a Negative Declaration woula,'� be appropriite• j ' Respectfully submitted, 3 Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engi?:#rer BRH:JS:sd AttaChmentst Vicinity Map ('Eihibit "A ") Tentative Map (,Exh'bit' "B") JI) Resolution anc! Recowande(I of - Appi•ovaf J r i r qrr V., !F' PARCEL MAP 11 RANCHO CUCA:"ZO ;A file_ �� �s1�i� ,fit Y' R►p ]�VWNIUI G DIYIWC N EXHmm. A '...."r+a� -.. �, �, �tiFJ RC- _>.._- STR�Ris°- • ".� "G`' =�-,. _,., _ � /. i _�`1 `_ - -•,�.. - fir`'.- s4 f�OTNiL6 ._. ` kk WY OF a PARCEL MAP 413 1 a -O FEsa.Uiaori A REGOLUTION' (IF THE.�;Ati.�(ING COtdI+ll$„SION. :_'THE CITY OF iiANCHO CUCAl GA CSi�;IFt�3M, CONDITI�AVILY APPROVING, 4 TENTATIVE PARCEL. WAP NUMaEA 11341: WHEREAS, Tentative F rcel Map ..Humber by �ecis A 5u mitted? Oevelepment Company, applicant, for t to ,purpose�,pf sub diviylt °�to 1 Marcel, the real property, situated in ihs drty bF `hk_ t �� ; a 0unty Of San Sernirdino, State of C41ifernia, I en t f1 ? X13 14 at the south-"t is t6rner of ChuOcb 'Street �� "ia<ci " Iodated W}tEREAS, on ?arch, 198&,, the FGanning stop herd a. du!}r, advertised ublic a Tina for .the move- descr',o ed rn �!- '' NON, THEREFORE, HE RAMCK CUCV" - ,- �LAk'4iti� Cii�ISSX�:i �ES(1iVEU AS FOLLORS SECTION 11: That the been made- 1, That tike ma, Is pMpsisttfmll- with the Oeneral Plan, 2, That the iigsrovemegt cf the praFnsad subdivision is,;= consistent *ith the Oeneral Fian. w 3, That tyre,.iisT 3s phYsica17y suii;:ablie 4.,. That Li o pr.9phsed subdivision and i inj}`"0v,ents wiil - not t�a%se sabstantia'i eijyironmert: al damage, public ,nalth Problems, ®r "have' aitvPr-,e affecis aajti -butting., , proPe,, ty. SECTION 2 -, This �^Gfi�ftt�.f8eds and certifies _ . ; that the h ee3 reviewe th th pan r3 e . J� California 1�nt-ironmenta: 4970 and, furtirfo,; this ` Cc--nission hpr-eby issues .a Negative G abort, SECiYQ1 3*,. UaV Tehtative 4 -col 'lrrap o� 113 is. -hereby apprt�ire sub acti to M attached Stans:arx•, dcodltiws And `the, fo ldwl'.1g 'Special Coadi 4Y?rES: -r 1= The ,project-,_-is to drain g b f this eurrelt ly . unit roved Oa, Creek' ( Oil; ` iPrtR a ne corjsti6ction, buil�iin� Q grilling permits •alZ be 'iSSue(f`,Vntit tKa Terra; :Vista t aste lap Stcrm Oxaio �i,iP--� IL c4. s;ugcur�e* ,;lye * want P64 i ICI df the ,bay CPS alternate .,drainage dispa�al sxste C ?is', . act {on of the City °Eng #'nder 2. The fml7 w l [gal Eas " °corrstr -act- d fuel vaidth far ~t z ? 'St ted.lTMits ehce t, 1 t4�.,, yfi t of�rs4te parkway impravements cimay he �c erred until der; ,ant of the ad�azer� P�'�iterFy. RESOLUTION I388 1 ASE 28; . a, Aiiliken Avenue from Base Line Road to Foothill Boulevard including l dscape,d median; and b. Church Street frost P ITiken Av, nn to the ,east; pr,cperty, . boundary including fandscapod inadaan. s 3: A traffic `signal shall be ctnstructed -at the "Milliken Avenue and _ Fo.4:lnill Buylevard � intersectlen prior to opening t;� .North leg to Traffic. The design and conWuctian cast :,all, be eligible ' for credit against the Developers Syst*m Beve16p ek Tees if so - _ approved by tho, City t9�,�ci l , I � %' • The "proto -04 bus bay en Chu" .Street, shall be relocated easterly outslide of the curb a * r; area to the s�atisfact;.bn of ' the Ginty Engthee - l;Median sT1nd break along Church Street shall be deigned a fcanstructe w,4t an eastbound left turn pocket � A►t easemnt, fo .a joint mt - dr jl. eway she'f l be provider prior to approval OV, the Final 'Map or' _issuance; of bui ?ding` perIf €s, whichever occurstfirst, for .Milliken Avetwe and Ghsarch Street,;.,, A?PRpVE!} AND ADOPtZD rHIS- 'DAY ('OF r PtAMNINU COMh tSSI 1" =1 }T SY ,r. RAHCfO CUCAMO6t6N =� BY: —Garr; etifi'a"'rn J'f ATTEST'. ,k ordu au 11 er, DepUty ecFF-cacy ` I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary b "" the Planning Comf'Wor, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cee-,tify,'that Vie foregoing Resolution waS• duly and -egularly, introducev'g .passel, 'sand adopted by the- Alaaring Czwission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a-regtt;dr meeting of the`PlaMing Commission held or?„4the 9th day of March, 19L�3, ►,ty�,the following vote- toowite COMMISSIONERS: NOES: iISSYOflERSW` 3 ABSENT; ice.,.. C? ��__ ... ..,. <' ' P; _. _ .• r} cis) , t If � 1 1 Vz Y •� r ��� j ~� yy $ '. VSV« N yy y I N all v z F s 311 b US XT11 M! In iv, 4 1 E_ • S° 3 ° $J 311 ° Y 4 -k N .. w itg » ®>. A b Aid V r ! IV!- as - I . A a >i via - L r` an ;.,m,+` _ y -_ k C r ( yy G yY. t •'1 . Y- g w 2 o J s 3 rE �L r Z I M� �� ♦�r M � ) y� pal' �� �� 8» �+ uu ra `r M �Y ` d�/n aN j. 12; a+YL .W.O G'Nf:O KY�9 6�j V� �N W pj, 0— "�� CITY OF RANC140 Ct`i;AMOYG,& STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 1988 r ` Tt;f: Chairman and i ers, of the p anning.Comission j FROM: 8arrye R_ Hanson, 3eni3r,.riais fneinwnr SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSI" FOfcJEN -ATIVE TRACT 12332 - 'C[tI3TlAtid - A �'istom' 3c1# re si�ri is " uTt3itTsian 7"' "on pa pr- nae t y, SS ages of land in the Very rzaw Residential Dittrict le';~. than two dwelling units per acre); `iacstad 01 tht east side of Maven Avenge north of the Hillside Drainage Channel + APN;ZJ1- 121.24 I. BACIfa ) �UNL -{ On January 27, 1988, the, PlAnning Cor Issie.n reviewed a request for a time extension, for the . obave- referenced project, burizg .the meeting# j- homeowne�rs within the tract expressed concern `:about 'thr^.e >.areas of the tentitWe tract designw A. The width of the ast -West collector streets, B. The ,humped dasign Vfr ,thd ski intersections, and C. timite'a access to the tract. , On Februar? 24, 1988 the Planning Cc "i.ssioc continued the, pr,oJect provide staff mo�� =. ;me to prepare,a re^pnhse to the- HoMeowners concerns. TIC MALYSIS: III A. Street Widths= The homeowners requestef;` that the rain collector streets wit'lin the Tract be increased froOl the appf lived width of 32,,„ feet to Um city 30rai streeir Standard of 36 Ease} The streets Which are 3Z fent, wide are shown by a dashed line on Ex4ibit W. `-All other stt-eets are ;36 «, feet wide., tj ' Trye streets which are "42'fnat wide and posted for no parking 5)0 boon � sifdes will provide for bette,4 traffic flow -than, a8, font'wi a streets wiiith parking, because their )is less "side "frie #ion" caused by the p�� ked tars. This parkina� *Strict ion should noa -; cause a perk ;n% detlicien':.;: -e- ecause no Iri front on th�k titre ts. _khe other streets anti sufficiently wide fir parkingl Aott s ides, and the is is ;ire= !� i ge with 16ng driveways J TZK ,H ti : �i dNRINS OMUON T#F REPORT I t - Cfl1STgAFlt3 COMPANY MARCII 9, 198i,? FADE, 2's� 6 8. B"ed Intersections- he h neownars expresxe concern for the appa' �tly exaggerated humps on the downhill Cleft of the streets intersecting with the maim Collector streets.: As stated by the Devel€rberls E�tgines�;�(letter ' . attached), these, htMs were In Inti �oktrti t ' 1 ' ...^ �.. . as.m oL l ,th �„loped Phase o f the Tract Tc 1.2312�. v. .i decided that .it •tyas a 90er And., more ecatomi`Cal 'design t4 contair drainage within the main streets and prev�.4 it frow entering the cul de sat Streets. The only way t6 accoMlish this wat t`6 rye the entrances to the cdl-,d 9,Aats,' Oich, in conjunction v-ith the steep i, street gr•a4as, res,,:l+el in the mmaggerated humps. Tft :t _ q - w.coacoptual of tha .0se this grading pla for the rp " design. ;I C. Access: The hoaeowrrers recst'that at¢ adstlitpnai access�f be provided from the easterly . portipe , of , tij jroposed Trait, c�annect irtg to some street other than Haven x irenue 1' firi the event that Haveh Avenue •, is made impasslb4e. ,r The proje;'e. C'zrrently `ttld fl "connection ,has potnts of t3 Havei,_,, there•c, Avenue a meets the . intent ,, of the DeVOo", int ,Code_. r 3gardi ng secondary accesi1, `"ese Ohnect.ipns provide adequate street capacity to serve time .t+affic from the 93 eMsting „ lots plus, the 161 lows . voposed by,t" rest of the development. The Staff reCIMgendation is that an addi4iohal access connection wi:li� not be necessary until development - zhe currently vacont triangular' property adjacent to time Tract north boundary and the `,r" sod Control District (SBUO) property adjacent to the Tract east boWary (refer tQ Exhibit PKO) , A. Caster plan showijjg 42 lot.- for to nartnerly p op?�rty is shown on�Exhibit A µ , and a master plan for the easterly prop rty showfng 52, lots is More on Exhihit "C', At'v *ss i r further develrpmer+t- beyond the bodnd( ,Jes of Tract 12332 _ =arc re ccompliShed by extending', streets ;rom this tract northerly,-to -the - triangular prcpertl+ and eaf�E�rly through the'SSdfiCo property, ` .hen southerly across a bridge: over"z Ji lsitie ; hannel for ejt;, Or - ,Hillside Road or W tson Av;thuio' as shown �on FxHbit - construction Of the access,. w�ll'be a requirement "of he �euelopme "of , >qt .the triangua�r and/or they $Ca rrt? rQP21ity, , Once constructed, this access Can serve `` pth Tracts iZ ,12- 1* %artd 12331„ �l a t CQt�4�5SI.t3N.S7A1__ -___ TE�TA"'� TR1RCl`- CRI5YIANO �OMPAPtY - - l MARCH 9, 1988 WE 3 j III« CONCLUSION- It . appears that 12 the Concerns expressed by thQ homeowners withinrract'' a 332 -I, ,wifil,'be ,addressed by the advr,nistVat ve clarification of conditions of'ap!araval :included 4A the attached resolution. r IV. RSCOhi,�tENOATIOM; `. Staff recammn& 'F at.. a yj --:3ir {.` =fs.x= `vatnsd�}i "ill iM�n+M tin# el nts on this smatter, If.; after such coh ideraticn, the Comissibn —�, cart' support the recommendation of : "approval,„ adoption oft the attached Resolution 10th clarification of conditions would 4e appropriates Respectfully sutssafitted, S r� Barrlre R. Hanson h 'Somior Civil Engineer Attachments. txhibit-_ "A"P - ,Narrow Strftt Locations Exhibit, "ti" Area Circulation play . -' Exhibit Vf'- 58CFW pr9perty Mather Pl in ! I Resoluti6n of Approval Prior Staff Riports " I r � , ' 1 , I � Ss- i ,!f,. tin ` ,a >t•. w� i _7.• w�.l�"l`� it � /I •� � ° .� �- - -i- '� ' � : �•�✓ � / �; ® �1 ! ,� �� � .l�d�� �ry � 1. _.•� /� �� 1 �$ X 41 tj - 4 .� a j •+ 'Qo ! �. raq �i rr 53 iffs w x !ti Adpbl J`' � �.` yam, � �'•ca,� 4' */ �, >�+� \ :► S . � y 1 W,;Srvm Ave LEOENO crry 0.7 i — 0 b. �P 24 - cents" al so log ne COUTROL t1CT 9C T T N aj,(1y i MPCT N. TTUR 17 r. 'h i 41 !/N' M A. /�j /}� �'�W \ \i UCMONid3.. gig �1 RESOI,UTXON MO. A RE UTtON OF ?!iE ,�,�i(!lCliO Ct�CAMQFIGA PLAkNIM6`'Ct i SSif�h' I APPR9�'G A-TlK Y,9109 -'FOR TENTATI}t TRACT.; No. 121? A Recital E. r r (i) The Cristiano GoWahy has {filed an application for the extension of l'ewtative Trrct,No. '12332,as, described In the title of :his Resolution. iHcreinaffar`, in this Resolution, the sub,�ect Time Ex� ion , request is ,referrer to as "tie .applicaition", (ii) `' On March R, 1986, th s Cimimiss on adopt editsJResolutic"'t .itq.. 86 -23, thereby approving, subdect t' specific conditions and time -. iii "ts, c, Tentative Tract.No. 124 32, All`-tiegal prerequisi- s to the ad6otion of ttiis Resolution ';ave occurred. B. Resolution, Ql ti(m THUEFORE, it_is �reby found, determi'd and r�'solved- by the ,- Planning Commission o thse"-ity of itancho Cucamonga a$$ fcjilc; "s: 1. This .Comm ission hereby spec,4fically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct: 2. Based upg7 substantial evidence presented to this Comission, including writtenA and oral`s'taff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fo. lows:- (a) The pre4iously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the Cityrs current General Flan, Specific- Pla s, Ordlinances, Plans, Codes and Policies;-64d _ (b) The time extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant intionsistencies with -the current . Generale Plan, Specific flans, Ordinances, 'Plans, Codes_And Policies} and (c) at -tfine extension of the Tentative Map }' is not ltkel�, to cause public health an safety ;)robleasl and c. (d) The fame extension is within the tima limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance. tl ' Q. ` PLANNING Cf44ISSION RESOLUTION No. TT 1233c'- Chriatiano Company ` January 27,;1988 'Page 2 _ sk 3. Based upon the findings and conclosions set forth iry paragnaph5 1 and 2 above, this CoMissf-n hereby grants a Time Extension for: Tract k2ir—at'1021 12332 Cri,tiano Compa,;y February 12, 1989 Subject to the fol'los►t`ng administrative clarification of the conditfmns of approval- The 32 foot wide streets shall be posted--"nor no parking cn both sic;esr. 2. The downwn ' legs of street intersections shall be designed to minimize the effect of rolling :the profile if mquired for dril3nage control. 3. Tho cul-de-sac si,reat (Court H) at "thi southeast`s corner of the Tract;, shi-Il be' designed with both a'' turnaround "and access Zo 1wr'��erty.,to ,z the, east \\ as approved by tho City Engineer «, !_ 4. The deputy Secretary to trtiJCaraaixsion sha"11 certify to the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1933. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGd BY, Larry f�cN'i el-,-Cha rma — s ATT:S7• Brad Buller, eRuu '3ecre ary I, Brad Sullen, Deputy Secretary of the Planning COW -iss'1on of the City off" R;.hcho Cuc&nOJtga, -,P hereby certify that the foregoing Re %siution._was. duly and m,,ilarly intr d�iue 1�, pissed, and adopted b� the i'lsnni, Co�ni -was ul and the City of Rancho Cuemnongay: at a regular meeting of the Panning Carmissor[ heid on the 9th day of March, 1996, by the rollowinq vote.•to -grit. r h AYES. COMMISSIONERS.- NOES: COWISSIDNCRS. i� ti -`W: CORMISSIONERS. , p e!i' ME o CITY CF,RANCHO CUCI&MOh`t'A G STAFF REPOORT DAi'F: ° February 24, 2988 -, ten TO: Chairvian akd,Me*ers of the Plantlnj comission FROM: Brad Buller, City plaPner BY: Scott Murphy, AssociatN, planner =s SUBJECT: TIME EXTUSIOW FOR TENTATIVC Tk� r 123ag r.RISTIANO A, cus a"' - ti`1G'i'ois o�z appraxiMwxtily ab 4Cre-s or lard fn, -the Yery 'i7ow Residential t District Mess ttaan two duelling „unisr per acre ?, located OR the east, sida' Of haven Ave"Oe'° north of the Hillside Drainage Channel - 1P!i 2OI =12Y -2a. 3ACXGRVN6: On JdnUary 27, 1;'188, the Planning Comei,sion revi�+wed I,, reque5i"or a tips extensio s for the 'abave�:�eferered prcert, U6, ring the ai►+etsi ,homeowners within the tract e:ipressed cont�rn about three areas of the tentative trdCt design: I. Limited arses to the tract, 2. The width. of the easfi -wet,: %lAa;tar Ptreet ,, ,,, nd_ The rolled design of the street fnt&seeticns. II. ANALYSI�r' ` A. Access The exit "ing homeowner . or thek tract felt there was, in essence, `Oy cre point of accrsy into the site. Oet;aLjc bi t cOnections 14'to the tract sere ` off Haven A"eh0v ° ,he residents were .-concerned tfil is haven Avenue was to be bi they WOUlid not be ebie U exit,Xho- tr ", and Berg €R4Y vehicles would :tot be ab`re to ..: er the resin. fats. Th^ residents felt that an access � hr;ld be proviii d to the, east, with a bridge a,<r the Chat r } to connect to the 2xtensirr. of Milliken Avenue € 8. Street Widths The °hotxeowi�+-•,were also coq�er;�ed about tsteI width of the -� st,west t t*s that serves es collector ttreets for the, tr Gt, E F +vat *" streets were ari P all a . pp "oved with j�- -- M1 070'1-02 0 3 -9 -88 PC Agenda 3- of 3 papticui�rly' the dopaihxll streets, did net Proeide, adequate sight distanic visibility. That downhill $treets had beeno designed with �'u Ohua�pk' to prevent raster from running ,ci f► the cul- debsacso <, th the -roll in the streets visibility of onc,00ing traffi etas difficult. The i residents felt that a similar desiWAOuld not be repeated` within the remainder of the tract. III. RECONNEWATIOli: In order► to allow the applicant and staff time reseaRN Wiese isz res, > the Planning 'C*Wssion *%',•nu *d this item for' four (4) weeks. On February 12, lk'4 »tiff t. receive new Infomation froar the" applicant but Wdas, ,t dad sufficient tf* to analy ;e the nett aeaterlal. Ther staff rec ids i;is this c,i Ce be continued for two weeks. Re .cly x t 8r "�Cl ty P7 nar « �, ea•s4i:�e,, h Attachzients:. Exhibit "a" • Letter from Associated Engineers Exhibit "8" -- Letter, from. Flom# „Control Listrict Exhibit "CO site Utilixatior' Plan Exhibit 101 •- Conceptual Grading Plan” Exhibit "E'," Conceptual Master Plan a , PIANNIiA CC* -OSION sTAffr�REPORT Try EXTER,'sl�4 FOR IT 12`�3j - cRISTIANf . . Fa ruary 24 1888 C 'Age, 39 foot curb to curt width VhIA only sii�l 'qws park 1,ng"gn one side of the street. T'nw,City standard for puitTIt streets Is 36 fear curb to curb which ,all, po' king on both sides of the strMet. The resid:n#s t tats iliac the am pen width shouTd be increased to not the City sttin6ard, C. IlWlsection DeSITI TEie hONeowe;ers �6tated OMt the design of xo of the 1 1 1� (1 a 0 n C- 214 FASt f MENt n (MIAM, CAW "M A!17# r tTf4► N4 i11S #n r`J MAIW' t4At$ E: ist� ,:Ri! %Oti�'i0#iT�Sri�.T�64774't �1 , r,�bruary 12, 1V088 Mr.r3rad Huller Dirdator of Planning City of Rancho Cucaaotlga i 93 40 -C Baseline load Rancho Cgcamongo, CA 91730 (? RE: Ten(`tive Traei`'13732 Extensian Pla:iping COWNixgion Cnetinuance Submittal d ;i Dear Mr. Bdllar: � .s rursuant t. ,;our recent meetinS "ve3�r>i�x?,�� the' Pl nning C iasion, ��4n� xnaanca Of a conBdnC' calends it** foe *:"* 2� _.', of Tentative Tract 'ii'3 12 t, !hereby submit the folloving � A: four prints of Tentative 'Tr ",�t Ito. 123321kevised to ill p 'r:tt�t, th* approximate toca tion of tzao; - cif access. Condition og lapprovat for Tr. 12332. Raaolation No.'�6 °23j ;rjdction 2, X- ag4ine �R Item 3 rero(irfs an Access $ssement. S. four prints of a matter plan showing poteutiat devel.opmd�q�d ;; of the adjacent property to the east ` awned by the San,H :rnardind! County Flood Controt District. 'if, i Prior to the devela ant of c6a ' determined fe poxeritaal water plans pU t be,, I. The Flood Control l7isttri plans to. '' til,iae the propertAIEar i bs o purpvHes; 4See copy o letter frt4 =`the Flood Control 1,14 tr�t dated 4 -22 -$7 included hersvith3 0 2. if the Flood Control District would offer the property for se"te; 3. if the ultj%ote oWP'er., could obtain a Tentative map V4or residential dev'lopment, then the Owner would have to, det /,,,rmine a. ,He :osald obtain access tra He via Tract 1;,332 ar/eI Tra..4 12332 -1 via at joint use of aocese;,agreemcnts ar, / C "�� — .�ir....s.. a xl,�aetr - r�.esu�•.�. :tf- - «,,.... «.,.._.� ,: ,i _ - . �iccss`s tia�i -the east or south by development of now roads and bridges. C. Four priuts of the A.L.T.A. Survey iiat-,marked to show the proposed itIM-stion. of an emargenCy ACCa''56 tq� "� east from Tentative Tract 12332 to Wilson Ave. via the existing bridge, and road on Flood Control District property. The easement would allow resideats of Tr�oct* 12331 and 12332-1, during an emergency which blocked the Ha"ven Ave exitp to drive to,the'Weat side of the channel, thety north an ths gravel road to an existing beidget then cast across the bridge, and south along �the east side of the channel to Wilson Ave. The easement could also be used, by fire and , safety personnel, to bring equipment to the t;rtct&., Wo have been in cdownictition with the San Bernardino County Flood ControV District, Los Angeles DePartzment of Water and Powit and the-Southern California Edison Comp� any to initiate the Process of obtaining the necessary easementafraa each I �gtnoy. in addition, we have requested a letter from each agency w4ich indicates their position ad thl's matter. At this c1mej, wa have received no assurance they will agree to the . proposed eftsrget:;;� access. It is customary for each zZoacy to have a normal review pert' -Xor this type df easement of �;w* to four tonths. e `IY AML The Flood Control District has informed us on"easaments 'Such as we �'��e , requested, they will requive the City of Rancho Cucamonga to assume,,,/ell liability which could arise from the use of this roa�!,. 6 6 D. Four prints of,ravisea��Site' Utilization Map. E. 'One print of the Flood Control District Right of Way Hop as informa�ion only for your Engineering Department. In response to Barrye Hansaula request we offer-_ the followin�_Information.� A. The reduced roa4yay vidthg specifically on Tacksto-m Street# Ringstem Street, Calico,ij�Court and Brarble Court were approved,,by the Commission to tt*ns'�'er thti normal parking area an the unloaded side to the landscaped' areas. These streets should have been posted for no parking to accomplish this goal. If this htls� iiot been done, we are willing to assist the existing homeowners in posting the existiug streets. 5. The seemingly exagerated humps, 'at south running tul-de-Sac3 was designed primarily As drainage 'thati, a control to a4sute atom fVows are di 11 rected'whtre, they are, supposed t4 go. In steep �,�eea I . run off cf-, 714 ;733 •$fP 7Atit?t CQ. OEMTME T o� , E c_^� rr tare, F U" WOW Aovw ON OWN � 2sE; ifs�A So tl� � �a�Rr�nat&id. GIA #R�ti- 4�3fl`)� t9S�1 tt7Y2�Si ,r `* , MiCHAEt "'''O WAWA soptV bor 2at 1987 Filet 1-5wa"Pa �- Tt�c�'s�4sCirrnsa Taira �' 1100 gain 3t. 00ita H r�S Irvine,. U714. Attn. Robert J. Szolmayer � e :r: � p� tweet �f• iatiale ieosss�� D+r ice. 9tala,ayas -, WI.a Distri6t'* i4VOUSOU00. iitti YOUr rOQUOt W P, `tY revested, that it`, is troorYw by tam Di ri '.fie � Cro* . aw to 4onditl that haet FdemUy ta,x 4t 40a M prortiss ass era tairg t>c i�sr � ' u�tli� igi,, 7b ro W0,04WIty sett ewe )* 4ors, 1W t; heat Dis�t�riat and the :'U.3. p4 4e 44440408, � U* .0,�Ar m*w �t'ati�C Project to t31e" mirsa� `YaOs�d to ltttt�2l+1d4`�Ir �jk+lit9 1>ta �'w � . lrtina at " stt1d -*s t t* W"rty asst be rotained star Smsibla baski Z ung If you ht", any questicne, plow"- Pontact Kin Villiwo at (7141 387427S$} l M Iwo Ant.. JDirs'►tor'.. Permit, i �1'���r4tatioN� Uonir i€�Gr�t,Ff1sY r ;t r 1 , I ! � j11 .. t F ''l � iR irrYi[Pr• Y a z CITY OF " » .� ClU . ,%, PL kNNI\'C D(VSM EXHIPAT o- _ r r , t .r PI ev F CITY OF } CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT O I DATE: January 27, 1988 1977 t 1Y,} TO: r Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner, BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT' 12332 - CRISTIANO cuszom lot residential sUbdivision o i'o s anon approximately 85 acres of land in the Very tow Residential District (less than two k1elling units per acre), located on-the east side of Haven Avenue north of the Hillside Drainage Chanel APN: 201- 121 -24, z I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 12332 (204 lots on 141 acres) wiar orrg na y approved by The Planning Commission on May 11, 1983. The applicant recorded Phase I '(53 Tots). Subsequer►tly, the applicant received a new approval for the remaining 1-31 lots on February 12, 1985, which is due „to expire an February 12,, According to the Subdivision Map Act, a tentative ('ract map may be extended up to five years from the d 1e of approval. Therefore, the applicant- -may request two additional time extensions, in one year imrements, extending the map until Febraary 12. 1991. The applicant is requesting a one yeae ttme extension to expire an February 12, 1989. il. ANALYSIS: Staff ha �analyied the proposed 6me extension and has compare the proposA with the development criteria outlined ift the City's Development Code. Based upon this review, the project meets the Basic Residential Development Standards of t1i0_0evelopment Code for the Verl bow Residential District except -for the required minis" lot frontage of 50 feet at the frnnt, property line. This:- project shows 19 lots of the total 151 that have a lot frontage, ranging from 40 to 43 feet. However, these $9 cul- ad.4;Jc lots average 31,516 square feet, over 8,400 square €pet larger than the average size of the remaining lots within" the tract. This inconsistency is not considered to be significant by stuff and would not significantly 'alter the development`Zii the project. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that, tho VPlanning Commission approve to time extension then j th doptior� O is Resolution. PLANNIttfi,iU.�9�iMON STAFF REPORT TT 12332 � 1 Christiano Company January 2t. 198 } T J Page E r r. Resptctjuly Submitted, /Ity r P ner !r B3:TG:vc Attachments Letters €roM Applicant Exhibit. W - Location Map Exhibit *86 - Tract flap 'C* Exhibit - Equestrian Trails and Landscape Concept CCU i Resolutio�6 -c�,, 61 ; ' Time Extensftgf ReSl "jution of App -sirl , •r l I '.V iV riff 1 J r' 1 THE CRISTLANO COMPANY December 2, 1981 Mr. Brad. Buller Director of Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 -C Baselina=Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: Requ6 -%jt for one -year extension on Tentative, Tract 12332 Dear Mr. Bullere WO have dust acquired the unimproved, portion at Tentative Tract 22332, and have contacted ate', n9inearing company, to complete the required work to record a °final t%sp. In addition, %W& have begun our market research efforts to determine the t�T* of product most suitable for the pro36ct, which. we believe will. bye vary 'compatible with the existing development in the tract. Since we have been _ informed by our consultants that there is 3nsufficjf�nt time to • Complete the above- Work be #ors expiration of fF:� 1 Tentative Tract Map, we herebv, request Cdpsideratian in extending '�ertativo -Tract Mapr12332Gfor ones year in ordar for us to ck)mplrte our work.' Encipsed is our $62.0C), tLl3ng fee required for the Tentative Tract P4;.�p extenscion request. kease,file this request today in order to be pla4od o 1988 agenda. n the January 27, If i you have any qurstlons, phrase eel free to cortact me at anytime, Sincerely. i THE " / L STIANO DOMpAny ' C. RoberVJ. $Zmloyer -�� 1 RJSicJs Enclosure DOC' :SOBS.- Extension - Rancho Cucamonga , nn �Vi�ac}}. tgg� �`qq. 4J I G I l i ers - SNSJl.T4NPa C' tV{C. Et�it3lPlEkti� SAN BEFINAi6INO OFFICE 166 W. HOSPITALITY LAN,0, SLATE IS SAN BERNARDINO, SEA. 92409 � 11 December 15, 1987 Dir?ctor of Planning J c, �I' City of R&ncha Cuwamnnga 6i f IidQ ` 934t? fusel ne Rom; Alt Alta Loma« CA 94 1; i n Re: TenyAtive Tract 12332 w Havenviatt 3:stata; Dear Mr. Buller: %/' (� a We hereby request an extention of tl,* ,approval Of Tentative Tract 22332 - HavenaieW Estates wh his due to {expire in Febru ;pry. Please notify me if ther* is anything which would prevent t granting of this first extention. Thank you for your considerat un this matter., C very truly yours,, r( ASSQCIATED ENGINEERS, INC. f l Philip IV% Douglas, P.E. (_ PMD:sI c/ j ca: Mr. Walter H. LabaM, '- WHO. Corp. Mr, Robert Szoiomayer - The Christiasio ao. ,fir. Frank Williams - Associated Xnginters'(Ontario) � J.N. 82 -66 p ( r` l MAIN OFFICE: 316 EAST E STREET ;, QNTARIO, GA. 91764 . (714) $�i.5818 CItY OF .C► .,' ,: =- , SCALE- : ;c- Ct.... _,.. ..1 A. •.iw�• n �, NMr +ta.R,MV•w.wr Rx Moo wb _ E NT.ANVE V ACT 12332 . `lc 1 H CITY OF 61JCi.1.tJ' 4.Ca 6o..PiN TITLE. PLANNING DIVISK>N, t dq$ con er,'evi the _ Engineering rnd Planning ' ision s reports and` °has 4orss3d��- ed,other evidence presented at the public he;A. -ing. NOW, THEREFORE, the `"Tanning Commission bi i the C=¢i ..r' Rancho Cucamonga does resolv6 as foiT�aws, SECTION 1: The Planning COMAssion makes`'the fo' towing findings in regard to Teniat ve Tract N0,12332 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract..a j c6tt %.tent with the General Plan, DevelOPMefit Cosh, and ,specific plans: ? �: (b) The design or in}arov", nts of the tentative tract is,; censistent with'Ae General Plan, Development Code,i and specific plans; (c) The site is ;physically suitable for the type of development Proposed; (d) The design Of the subdivision is not litieiy to cause substanti,I environmental damage and avoidable _ injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; ., (e) The tentative is not ;likely to cause serious J public health prdhlems; (fi The design of the tentative tract will not —conflict with any ease_nt acquired by-the public at large, ' now of recurd, for access Trough or;," Of the <, s property within the proposed subdivision. AWL '17` " J 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 8023 j A RESOLUTION -=OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RARCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CGHBITIONALLY APPROVING i i f S f f% the r".1 property situated in the City. of Rancho Cucamonga, County of $an 8evn'ardin6, State of California, described a as a 12, 1986; and , WHEREAS, the City planner ha;•, "recommended approval of the Map to all conditions set forth in r report*; t UHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read t N If � 1 �, �[�-� - %� it � t • s = z / t � , /L —'t_• � ?;` � � i S # tr, •mss i � i• R ?� � s OF q(� !TESL - I MIT � `ten _ tL Page 2' ; Cg) That this project will not create adverse impacta on the environftnt ,and a NeCative, oeclaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentrtivt Tract Map Ns. 12332, a;-copy of which is attached here o, s hereby approved subject tp�,all of the ##Vowing conditions and the attached Standard Condition_:, r.. PLANNING 7FI�ir3Ya►i I. A signature "sign -off" snail be qonte�ed 'kx'thift the indi. °idual hO"ftr+ * CC &� Z's. dttigMA 'to alert, the bu iv as to the r�dquill0 t, for stroidt ' tr,,eas, including ma:3nt%tta6i.*,. priors to occup cYw +jtraut � trees and slope plantings �onr)Individuai- puxceNs mutt- be intVtcted and approved by the City« 2. Parkstrip landscapin; and - str°aat trees, with appr-opriatt iirigation systmas shall be required along streets "M and "C". The required lands'cxping and str;At trees f uy be added with each prase of street construction. _ 3. Rooted gvround cover is required for slope bank erasion control where, squired by standard conditions. Hydrosgadlnl` `shall not _be allowed because of rocky soi ENGINEERING 1. 4edication of ingress and egress and maintenance easan4nts overall. interior streets shall be deditated on tho rinal Map to the City of Rancho Cvx.?ssonge Engineering and Public Works Divisions; iho C,uczMnga County Plater District; the San EernardiHo County Flood Control District; Southern California Gas Company; Southern California Edison Company. 2. Tb* northeasterly porgy on of tht pr6ject area �Flctd Control District Easawt) 3'rall be made a part of the tract maap. The CC & R's for this tract sh *',: make provisions to incorporate, this area into tF Homeowner's Association opte this area is develiped. 3. An access easO"ent . by sapaMte instrument _0471 b provider; to the properly ly%9 east ,af the *"Ject area (owned by San Sernardino County Fl"- d Controt,� District). The docu ant 3�411 'bo Proplired to thR o satisfactiop of the .District.` This condition shalt be waived jf the access is not required by the Flood 1. Control District. a C Page 9 ,, , 4Q The HoRftwners Assnclation established shall provide 'Spec ii"tcal ly , for adequate funding for. the fu£urp i maintenance of the priy�jte roadw8ys the Haven Avenue "landscaping. . u l _ APPROVED AND `lAUCPI'ER THIS 12'101 TAY W FEBRUARY, 1486 . Pip! CENtSSIOf1 �F THE CiiY OF rZl#1i4H1f C 1CAPtl1Nq f BY• r n x trsu _ , a rmat AFTESTe Via•' I, Brad euller, ggp'i ty 5 Ptahsytn `` is ian of thR city- Rancho Cucaraongs, ao hereby �rtif' >f y -of= - regularly introduced Y �a" tie i`®fa OU9 Resarlw'ticni duly and and a eds amd . adbot_� by the Pla nI.Iq Camissioh City of Rancho �'-c ; ;a rent. 4v, mgeti of the Plannin '0 on the 12th d rr g Ccxnmiffision held ` y r hrtta ya 1 Bb, bar t1m4 f6 owing vote-to -grit: AYES: CO MISSIONERS: CHMEA, MCNIEL, BARKER, RF E,L, ST011T HOES. COMFtISSiONERS: NpN t ABSENT; COMMMION €RL- �` Nos 5 J /f r; t` r �.l Ciro OF 1CtIEYGPtO f lbAAfCSHS3.E ftiO4COW i, w 401.11730. III (7143 �Wlost tttt January 2S,, IBS , Robert C/o Tfr Cristian Co"arol 4400 MlaCli6^etbur 8iW.► $41,to 790 f k"rt IMaeh, rA 92WO SUWECT: T;AE EXTEIA4IOM FOK TENTATIVE MW I2M, ISTItFA� Tba Planning CoWssjon rgViswd the descri�td ' oCt at t� oir� raeafing oftanuxlr 27, 190.► i�laCa fission °j� no actio�� aft° iris ,;tirN�, t inst+Ra� CoRtinw� his '' i i ii* I it p 'oF F �a:cs > 24r r ' a tirnrgg be 1 J will hold nt t� �€a�'a C"a� , iii c+erlta�.t� Icci d iC $16 "soli nt load, � i he Coca ga arNd o+iQ i begin at I:9) pCi� If y oy have w- q�wsti#s��,; p�+���+e �+��'' fry tali ou,�r;oFiico at any; Sincerely, COMMMITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION area C. Kissack � Planning Comissioo S4tj4tary k 7A �� oowa ,` V drown s«rwrlwe�ira L1 Ntmi5 L. Swot rfft � �. .� e,,v wo, ow L"h3a�i.'f 7 �; L tr �+WyaP� TI 1 R�1t�141 Warcch 7, 1968 ,U - Dlrecior Cf ,Manning City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 "selin6l. Drive P.O. Box 847!' l � Aancha Luca t4oga, Cat, 91734 L', o :, ' Dear ' Sire On behalf, of the Do. -I Taco °store at 6799 Carnelian,, was wouId li% e 'to to withdraw me appeal the planning 06M- iissioh which is Scheduled to be heard o4 March 7. We will change the signs II bank to tho original within}° appr;* iMa.Gcj - `^ i thirty days. Yatrrs, tra3.y, � Stewart Brown Engineering Bepartmen� S8; sc , RFIi1�� EQ1 . Y -CA M4 wo At Suss tow I$ND#��{ ti�A E] ii t fro DATE: March 9, 1988 ivn TO: Chairman ane Ymbers of the Planning Co"iss on PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: APPEM. ,QP THE UNIFORM SIGH pRQGgM FOP ALTA`•LW PLAZA SHO '5R e aa o cot ns o o approva o a- ppe n ores ign Program fwposdf'Yb the City Planner for t4 tenants within the Alta'= avow'' Plaza Shopping Center 'located at the southeast eor -r of 19th Street and Csonelian Street. I. 9ACK640VIEO: on Maro 9, 1974, the Director of Community � eve opa►en approved Director Review 79-19, a Uniform Sign Program for the Alta Loma Plaza Shopping Center., Two of the cotrditioas of approval required by the sign program were to establ "far�own- lett -m and create - background colors for all signs wrttiin the cent, !- Existing deviation from the sign program for the major anchor" tenants occured through two separate director reviews* DR 79 -08 Alpha Beta and DR 79-35 (United California Bank) First Interstate Bank, II, ANALYSIS•_. on January 29, 1988, a representative of Del Taco su T applications to replace the sign Color on two of r the three Dal Taco restaurants within the city, after the nfWr signs had been installed. The reason for the new c0,10r is Del Taco in changing the signs on all stores to the near corROn=�te blue. The sign permit aPplicaV3ans_wer�e for the Del Taco res`tdurants at the northeast corner r gasetne,Raad and Archibald Avenue and &t the t southeast corner,'�f 19th ireet and Carnelian Street.. The Dell :Tats sign at the northeast cornea of Base Line Rczd and 4 Archibald Avenue (1243 Archibald) was approved as the new colors are in substantial confotAance with the .approved Colors for the Sycamore Investoents Uniform Sign Program. The view sign is identical in size and letter style to the original sign approval � for Del Taco and was approved as the sign prograM pereatts a blue sign cosy. Staff determined that although the new sign varies slightly in 'We shade of blue there is conformance with the Uniform Sign Program, and it would not detract from ti{€ uniformity of color for the centAr. i J ITEM ! PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Appaal of the Uniform Sign, Prcgraar { March 9, 1988 Tne< Del Taco sign at the Southeast corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Street (6799 Carnelian)„ was denied as the new color's do not conform to the Uniform Sign Program. the building is a free- standing pad facing Carnelian; howavei�, [del Taco is not a major anchor fcf= the center. The existing blue- backgroun and white - letter sign does not conform to the required creme- background and brown- letter colors of the sign program. The previous Del Paco sign was not in total conformance with the sign program as the colors were white - background and brow-letter; hcwever these colors) did tie:into the uniformity of the center., The intent of a Uniform Sign Program is to create a sense of uniformity, a recognizable Theme between all signs within a center, regardless of the number of parcels, structures, or uses rlthin the center. A uniformity of color allows for signs to relate tone another and also to the building. This center is a small sevei2 (7) acre commercial center where too much color- variation could take away from the architecture with the signage } Ong the most dominant element. The architecture of the buildingT- Mo, ,Id be the major identity and not the variation in the sign'ioTor. The Unifom, Sign Program does not give tenants any flexibility in the Osage of colors throughout this center. II. PRECEDENT: A prey- 41�s appeal before the Planning Commission set en tomijOs prece or decision: o In J8nuary�.` 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed an appeal from The ;Wherehouse in Cucamonga Village Shopping Center appealing/ a staff decision denying an amendment to the ' previous ?y approved Uniform Sign Program in the areas of letter size, color, height of sign placement, neon lights, extraneous infoW%Tfunil wall signs and the design of the monument sign. The t4ajcr issue in The Wherehouse appeal that relates to the Del Taco appeal is the issue of color. If the rase of The Wherehouse, the proposed sign/ color was blue when the established sign criteria for e center was red. (with Del Taco, the proposed colors are �hite and blue with an orange logo when the established sign 6Hteria for the center are the uniform colors of brown and cream/). In The Wherehouse appeal the Planning Commission upheld 'the City Planner's decision and denied the request. 3t was the consensus of the Planning Co+maission that the color- of a Uniform sign Program should be uniform. It should .be note;( that the decision of the Planning Commission, ,was appealed to the City Council where the decision was over -ruled and a compromise was worked out to allow for the blue sign based upon The Wherehouse being the major anchor terant, r. j PLANNING COWIISSIION STAFF REPORT; AQpeal of "the Uni forw, Sign. Program March S, ISM 111. OPTIIONgo. 1,'Me follorting ogtien$ bn�`eonsiderld by the P14nnin4 2- Approve the sign appeal as regnneSted; (� 2. Approve the sign appeal, but direst +he applicant aAd Ower of the -Alta LOW Flaze to- juWt a revised Uniform Sign Program -, n , 3. �en ; ,the sign appeal hs inconsistent ski th � `�ni Font S1 ogras and requir'e.,returning to the ap , i( "tolcrrr for the _enter. IIYo �RE�C_�, MDA ON: Staff recowends that the Pla<nni:tg Cowission,, "P -ATrur- e,io-n-ditiors of approval imposed by the City Planner for Sign Frogram for Alta Lan Plaza Stopping Canter and f R R lTy tted, Brad Bullar,,, City plaftr�en• BBr'fG f vc Attachments:: Letters of Appeal Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" r Site Plan Exhibit wC" Locations of All Other Neighborhood Shopping Centers Within,the City Exhibit "p - Approved Uniform Sign Program Or c 9 ara. rnaara ox s r� H 9r .ar acaa tia, CA~ r (,"3j a Am February 8,, 1988 Wsector of Planning \ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl1 9320 Baseline Drive. P: . Sox >807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 � Dean Sire '1 On behalf of Del Taco stare a' 6799 Carzw uen, we would like to file an appeal of the decision to return the logo colors back to the Ptlginal. Del Tacu is changing all it`s: -'corporate blue. shores °c.olcrs to the new o Yours truly, Rol Paterson `J RP /sG 4 ara. rnaara ox s r� H 9r .ar acaa tia, CA~ r (,"3j a Am lu CITY CF ITEM. RANCW CLUAMONGA TrrLE.* ji ' I i--r C , r joy Z Id co 7 Qf,•LU'.1F71 Mf l G1 t* 17VfL to all iiw 11 II � '�+~ . •a '� � �waM.oM r�waNM MwwwY i —^^ -� .tea ° �� ��-- -,�- -w '-.✓' a $' Y � �� . .-yl. s $ _ � .) •' _, r�,,.A ice* —*i+ .���� _•� �1� \RSA Hwyg: is Y. t}3 rL f93 "AWN 25 MR-1 :nil' J.I.i • �� .wwi w4nYwfY�r �� Y 61 City of Rancho .-Sign Per"mit Cucamonga. Aoplicat!Ti z "i. Date Name of establishment, 55 i9ki 'I�K , Address to, V arne - 1" Applicant% N Address RECOGNIZED—'* Owner's Name Signature Address Ph V o"___ iL SIGN DESCRI Number and type of sign(e): 'Z:�'_Temporary LWall� Monu t -Canopy -Subdivision -Wind(.,- ----Pedestrian Other LU Size: Length Width Depth OveraliKeight Sq.Ft. bldg. Face Sq. FL Sign 1. :5 0• Sign 2. U.1 Sign 3. > Sign 4. too Sign 5. Sign 6. It temporary or su6n vislon,dateoflnsta0stion If temporary or subdivision, date of expiration Cash deposit amount Indicate sign copy, size, color andmaterists ar. plan U_ ACTION pr v _Al�D.Injj�*'" ' 11 e&D z BT LLJ Date: Comments- ILE NO, AT RECPTED By. iz i RE �0 o m Ch 44 lul 11 g. cc vi 40 a ci ej r� or v ss �s tj ca ca '� � � � � t+ c'�,,, �y •��s w w � .,a YNY�� trn tin, N w q IV tN� C a Gd s A rF a!�f w{ A 6Q 9S ID CQ {,b, —Ch I �1 Cfl 64 t� GfiF ! � tom, * O O N x co i N ow 0. y� $ L : � del -46 a 'V (ff 4, A 02 USS V 69 A �" w A *C. Ste. l IV •,c a �c cG' v, n K ! u? -7.. `v' 08 UIL 7' Y4 ti CI% Ei G�i: fao ca _ Ca % v 371 pf r ' q 7. +F su 571. 44 6fr. 4�a m C% of tw cc c f. L 24 1' 1, xs c Y J ` TCU �i `;'; Ilk it ixx' t° � .�' t�if•�� _� yL E 11 J$E ;i 82�� =.Y t#s .Eii #ao aj O' T 4u a ar w c`s Afth a & z 45 Q' y g s LQ is A4; =' tr CITY, STAFF REPORT u_z DATE: March 91 1988 i9n ' Tae Chairman and Membe"ft of the Planning CogmissiQn FROM. Brad Butler' City planner 4 y r� BY: Debra Meier, Asscciate Planner SUBJECT: LTITFAMILY SETBACKS-WITH IN PLANNE } QF�i+g3� NITres I. BACKGROUND: As reque4ted by the Pla"'Ong �Caatissi'Q °staff has orepaare a attached ilchart comparing setbacks ti- family hand use's ' 31n Vict-,'ria! (Exhibit N7!_*) and Terra -" (Exhibit, "G "l with �dse of ,the Development' Code. It "backs are delineated by street classification ' °(i.e. Localx Collector,,. Secondary Arterial and Mayor lArteria�� for° a Medivaae Medium -HI h" and Nigh Residential land use desigration� There aN2 significant differences en setback �-44uirer nts between�t the Planned Co nities and the Devaloptgent Code. The'two, planned communities are faintly co)'ISO cant with each others eXcePt `,)n major.. arterials. Exhibits ".B" a C" .r;phicall_y f1'iustrata the setback comparisons for Maj,r and �condarl► Arterials and Collectors. Re a fully fitted, B 7e Cf ty anner ; BB: DMko Attachments: Exhibit "A" C*aratice-Setback Chart 1 . Exhibit "O" - Graphic RepresentationslMalor Arterials Exhibit '"CII' - Graphic Represen'tationsj$�condary Arterials - Collectors Exhibit "D" - Undeveloped Parcels' of M, MH, H Withfn Victoria, Exhibit " >" w Undeveloped Parcels of M, M14, H Within Terra Vistdt r :,l CSttba>~ks given - Are in feet frpi i4 iel ,N > p Gurbl i a*1ing Garage/ aarkfng Unit CArslort Lot Oyellfn7, liar €ge / parking Unit J CEVpprt L01: Owalling Garage/ ktrktng Unit cargwt,'i "to; Aft War Rot 41 " -- Terra Vista 32' - V1040de4r5 �`' '28' L9f 3b� 26' L4` WWI, „ 22, 22i Or ea11,Y6we1 " 32' 32. - _ Oavelopw•t CdCft SS` Sp 34' 53` f� (Avg.. kind. seapc 5W) * n-r. WGtot° Ee 17• GditlsoUt' 22° " 2Z" F,11, wle si 32' 32r - -., tlevdtoslsent CO3tr (RVg« %and+ 85' 4S' a5' 25' 85' Of 2i` scAra 45') YiCtorrae�. LOdE$' (Avg. Land.., 4F 1 2S'Ajr. e5' 25' ,fir ° X05 +fiT ' a sttpte 4S' j 1 G , ;i Terra Vista Victoria '101 15" i -LO' 15e 10. r ' -0txetC�pntlnL r 1'� W Code. . i2 a2' 2, 1« Rdditfd10 letWks rfouired for s4ructur" of 3.1tories or Mire= �. 2. Addttiodlt setb&cks'raqut -d for Church Street and Tfrrt Vista arha�y and for st`vtturEs of }stows or XOI*. .. . 3. OfMensiona 0OW are An A'lerOJO YetnaCk using 'Optionat" dtKeloptient lum arils. R 37 -Foot ererAge satbd:k is per7ltttt4 psing "Iasi o" 3tandaras in tha *0* destgratikn. ti 4. D1eEnstwii shays EssuMe ► typtcp1 12' 001ft ptrkwly, The width of the puoltC garkaay 6003 vary under eirtain ao"Oltio4s (1Zr -14 °1< 'I'torio Park kane Shthicks Ere stores two` aicA sytt4d¢ka ' uhf of- rJr y "asured frba rgh t. - 'two. ' . o y si ngl e story, IS. ThE tyDiCl sfbG;trot tyro fact is abo Ui 75': t1 o M rr Y7— xLl� f f If �A T-q m . Y iY Y7 s i K \ 6fi � o i YA (�C tai dRpQ I gMMMM ^:$R`3 lilt .._+,�',t y s All i 3 `.�j,..# x I 'q2Y.- jjw iL ,, �c `"r$, °•:2i#Ct -. +'fir. } Rx =• 4k I ._...�..,:.,,`tX� O "'^ �T< .bF4 +•r�(s �4 ,4�t ;;� fe•...fK�: g • a � t.4 Gt4 • aiNH M � }.M}ai 4f1f t! . .r t � c5 ., AL ui a I i�!- I t A lu IL Lj,— rL1j_l�jL Ul x x 0,31 a t 4, cc Z2 2 as c w 40 at c' r a dc 233 �;' �' :Q Ti ;, a. w N ti 1B n V q isi m M N N N N .°. s4o. - d .0 io ua 3 p - a ta c > N c": I, L ^.Y O CO u r. to O L L LL ��L 0.® y ytS L O w L N L N •r us 6 to.N M SAM �~/,XM� M.I. vl M tC Q t3 ieo g� sCLc� ur. z .�i' U �e 20 Ul ra ta St . L 1. C. .L L C6 0 . . , , t rt 1 i c ( _„ q a N n s !" : . l i J• lu - CITY OF RANCHO GTdCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 9, 19$8 TO: Chairman and Me-bars of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ` BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: MINIMUM rIUNIT SIZE; FOR AULTI- FAMILY DWELLINGS City ounc tnit'i'a ed/,s u o review Me Ye requirements for multi4amily.;- *ellingt, I. BACKGROUND: Recently0he Riannin:, Ca►s'ission t scussed a requ6i rly ifieZ:Tty Council to review various deve'l'opment standards in the k City, including minimum unit sizes nor multi - family dwellings, The Commission requested additional direction frmi the City Council o:r the unit size issue. On February 17,, staff asked the City Council for clarification of the prob'. ai. Staff indicated that the Co" ssion. needed a better understanding of the Council's perceptidd' of.', "e problewt and presentaid three options for Council consideratioAt A. If the problem is that some 'units are too small for their type, resulting in small rooms and 'a lack of adequate living space, mirimum sizes can be developed for each unit, type. B. If the problem is overconcentration of sr 11 , units, criteria can be developed for an appropr'�te mix of units, with the number of smaller dwelingslimited to a certain! percentage. C. If the problem is a crowded appearance of some multi- 'Family proects, perhaps it is not the unit size, but setback or open spate requirements that ;need modification. II. COUNCIL DIRECTION: �, The Council indicated that oil three potential: pro ems no a eserve to be addressed, and that the Commission should look at the Issue as a combination of these factors.. It was also;-,noted that in order to deal with this question effe4tively, infomation on the number, type, and size of multi - family dwellings built over the last several years should be provided arld analyzed. -j PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT MINIMUK LIMIT SIZE - HULTi- fFAAILY DWELLINGS _ . March S.. 199E _ Page ,2 ( (f III. t\i� "'°USSION: In staff's experience', multi -fmily unft sizes in this 1111V are mores affected by unit type °and they rA*tr of bedroom thA?x by the 'density category, although higher density Area,i generally tend to have somewhat s"ller units. The table below cvVines unit size ranges CypiCA1 of recent projects in the Cityy. Unit Tya IXL* Rangeo 1- Hedro4m 530. 750 stat1 J feet 2- 0edroom 8OQ - 12W square feet 3- Bedroom 10131! w 1420 share feet ) The question of appropriate minimm unit size .Js very s ''jective. riate Oft size cannot h' date atned pur��y t►y tech�tical ` - CIA Al'. As ' ria«� requested, staff will dekel4 ; -- ist of projects a ?rovod and ConstMCted in the City oger,. # last several years, and prepare an. Analysis of. the results. ,�•z My also be appropriate at that time is field schedule a trip #` {(r the Coy dssio" o see an actual proje# ,first hand, with some picot units available for c inspection. 1 fV. RECOMMF.NDATIOR: Staff intends to develop the inf4matisn requested °thTs a nd'°�ar -h-q issue. back to the Comission on April 13, 1988. Direction is needed As to the fold trip so her appropriate arr�agpments Can be amda. L �,"< 1 Res u'iv su 3 tad, Bra T City Pla er BB:'JK , € i ,.. !t 1] DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJEC' : CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVlONGA STAFF REPORT March S, 1988 " 5 1977 Chairman an4,Mwbers of the Planning Commission 1;' Brad ry l er,Ri City PlannQr, . and Chairman of the Trai`is Dan Coleman, Senior Planner COMMITY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES Y. ASSTWT:. � The Trails Advisory COO aittee has reviewed the Master a v'irails in �tjy Citjr'3 general Plan and recaen's fear Community trail S -*' targeted for improvement.- 1) Almond, 2) Beech — „,1V� -,W 3 Sapphire and 4) Hillside. II. ANALYSIS; A. General: The City's Gerrral Plan Trails Alan objective is to 7o ov a an interconnected sS040 of riding, bicycling and hiking trails. . ,” through " a three- tiered heirarachy of trails. The Cunity Trails a intended to unify the existing disjointed system of Local T Eder Trails. B. Selection Criteria: These four trails were selected by the rays v3soa�V- C&rraittee with one goal in 'ml-id - establish a. usable trail network as envisioned by the General Plan, They following crljteria were used by the Committee in staking their recommendation: 1. The trail ;: location is critical to the overall functioning of the trail network. 2. The trail Would provide taaximaK recreational benefits with a minimum of improvement. S• A relatively small section'/ of trail acquisitioit and Improvement is neespd compared to the length of unable 'hail created. C. Budd: Implement;,tion of the trail system involves three components: 1) acq('lsition of necessary right -of -way: 21 design and engineering, and 3) improvement. There is currently $50,000 in the Community Services Department budget allocated Advisory TGOwittea that additional fundingnbeoallocat dafor ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF WORT fJ RE: COMMUNITY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT March 9, 1988 Page 2 trail 'implementation in the Fiscal 88/89 work program and b dget. The budgetary process for next year has alrego started. / Ihj. TRAIL' PRIORITIES: The following report sOnm;arixes t�e existing raf-1:4a :n ons, reasons for improvesent, and a brief-, description of any nec"sary :dedications or improvements. I. ALMOND TRAILo Trail section between D(mens Crean „1 regional trail (top of Amethyst) and Archibald. The Corps of Englnesrs' P„ase i pr*ztt will complete the Oeftns Channel '.regional trail. Therefore, this section of trail will provide ar#cess to the regional trail and Heritage Park for residents in northeast Arta Loma. This section of the Almond trail- passes a6ross unimproved Flood Control land, and along. an 0i;ting local feeder trail easement '4t the north end of)�Tract 952�R. The nest end of this easement is blacked with,a �in link fence. the east end has a two -foot flood lrotection Wall :,that could be made into a "step -over• removing one course o blo . 2. BEECNNNODD/iiYLSQN l'RAILi ,J a) 'Missing link at 5706 Jasper Street resulted frrr �,, an oversight "by the County in not providing a con necil` g easement throug!.,,he side .yard on Lot 26 of Tra���,;. 9015. This section trail of would provide- continuous` { ,a trail from the western City limits to. Hellman. I Presently, trail user are forced orto the 'pave :ant of Jasper Street through the busy area the r at Stork Elementary School. Tram users west of Jasper would get a straight -shat trail to Heritage pork and the Demgs regional trail. J b) Trail section between Hellman and Amethysm consists of a citrus grove on the west and new residences, on the east. Lack of trail easeHents in the area forces .,trail users onto streets to get to Heritage park and Demers regional trail. Because W recent devtlapar nt 4�t the west side of smethyst, the t opportunity to obUin an easement is now during the di'Xis }ruction of the last one or Wo homes. Acquisition of an casement here and on Jasper would virtually "prnvide first complete east- west trail in the City of -:Rancho Cucamonga. Amok u !i PLANNING CC MISSIWSTAFF kE PORT RE; *W1UWITY TRAIL IMPROYMNT March 9, 1968 Pave 3 n 3. WPHIREa This section on the nest side of Sapp!fre from the HeeCh+�xaod Trail to H1110de is already developed with full street improvements,'' including sidewalks. *Tlierous local feeder trails spill out onto the Sapphire Street pavement. Because of the speed and inc> easing volume of traffic on 5opphlre: It is Important to provide a community trail la the parkway. it 64 preforabla to keep `the trail: � mute 'or the west side ° of Sapphire. Impra ements would inciui,!,t grading and clearing mite existing parkway for a trail, 1 andnssible driveway leodifications. 4. HILLSIDE; ihir seciTo'_fr r►Hellman to Amethyst is already developpeed w; A :} full s street i travel ip an east- west direction, riders must use streA; because of disconnected local feeder trails. The recwnt l completion' of the HilMde Wale- in¢,pro ect has made trail access Possible up to this *et,�, , iiip�tion of this section will P for property owners east of Amethyst. Improvements would include cutting path through grass parkway and 'possible drive m difications. SIn Lis t s 'l+ ♦ E ---rte. i` nMrrwrr� G !o cra +�si�ie �" VSG}WU3" �sro Emu ISMILSM (� C r Ci �. 0�_ j Y� Ul ERS uj 4 C •-- - 00 o ♦o +resrwsm w�wli jJ-Ao 9 t still Litt =