Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/04/13 - Agenda Packet0701-02 o 4-13-88 PC Agenda o 1 of 6 tt F� 0 tvi<bz A _AP* IS 1988 1:60 p.m. \� c LIONS tmm cSBpt`1iiEim'T cmiT UAZ �Mk CALIFORNIA L %0VW 11 c r IL 8631 can Cctmmtaeiotter �_,,, Commti" loner fsmgrtc coinmwaoza x�Clli �i Comt#ia�'MeNlol Commiolonet, *4toy _ IV. AWwralof March 23, IM,1 u .. V. d' ee�� A.. , ,{; ♦. nM '1+ - .yam, �.f "je. follo R.�Y{ 9 �t cl- '44i6�RNL� FMi i .alto sx� /Mod to b* r%tinP � nomvogtrov j� ',',i ` fey will be actod cn by Me Commimion at one time t+�i3hbcdc tra�rana 1f anyone 1w, concern aver, any item, should be remu O por 44 cuaaf-p. It- UMW - WILLIAK, LYON COMPANY - ar 34451 owrl o „ m as vatlo� tier site plah$and lot 11"; adjuertMont It�r a ptoviouay app6orad tract mop ow4stirW =of 218 airt8le family Iota ca 2#.& acres of land -fl l tho dtsa3%g lw L w-*ed m, 1eaid tial d�t (48 cgfMW sute pe aark3 within the 1110,xia ��ASmunity, boated at the iouthtiweat owner of Yictorh, Park and Itaoheator Aywwo ^ APN: 227- OU -10x it Rnc# 40 i`, W8'3N REVIEW - REPUBLIC 1113 IL 1��^ w da I ruv e � exevattma ana aeu ail _ glean toe A pttvkwly appeove4tract map oopWaft of 144 sftlo f y ' \ on 25,53 wree of Ian, f' the low Medfum DovAl r atdsr Dixtdot (4-4 ult:fs per �aore} wtthWn- iho ;;;,Nana Pied 3. Conti us t r ti>,a aouthasea ecrw 44, aura, st * AM 227 - I11-0:, O 4 ..__-IL..?+.:._ C. 1'F�tlt c I DESIGN RE VIEW WiI,LiAirl A13i(1N C 44tirllNY �; Design mvierr ofa[ bwdit>g aievattions, detailed site Plata, uir a 4 "prev,Giusly appzoved tract nlap calusisting of 1,0 single fetrsrily lots �? on 14.67 aa.IVe a of land in the 14W- Medium Dansitg. Residential Distrlat (4-8 dwr.0 q u is {per BA:ce) wi#hin he Yletotra Planr#ed 1 Community, lrtdated at the `northkvewt corner of Milliken Aveque WA Ylatorla v Lane. - API-1- 209-311-19 #M 14. l`C U Public,, r� "'A0 followitig itd w sire pub1 bi which concomod indivisiudIs may voice dheff opinion of t0d project. Pleases wait to be recogni -ad try i�e Chermdn o the Commission address by stitt(ng :your Hanle stud iadriress. � It such opinions anal! be Umited to &, 4inutes > per iteci#wldudi Pbs+each iO%r rec (` D. ENV%10Z [ENT y ENT AND GRUERA1: PLIi*4c•__„ ? - D PIT �- A reguesti o t Getreral- ! L amend {e Y,a Load Use Map from Liw- tediu„ Resideattlel {4.g dweitis unita per acre) to high Residential, �t v, 30 dwelling units per acre for 5,05 acres of land„ located ctCY (i oa-03 .8,19. (continued r m Marcia 223e198a8) �!ve ue j a nr. p \ L� ENY ONMEJiT'!`AL ASB'SS111ENT ° AND bk"LOPKENT IfL�'►c A� -t4 •- U 11 LO M request xo t0, end cite liana lopment , Distr ets map 1,ow- Medium (+4 dwellitgg >W its per acre) #o high: Residential (24-30 dwelung units 0irr acres) attached with the senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) to therbasa dUbiet for 5,48 acres of land, located on the youth side of lux dine :hoed, west of Areh 3 avenue - 1 AP s 20"31 - 14,19. (Coutint�sd ikattY March 23,198$) 17. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT $7=02 - NOURSE DEVELOPMENT 17eve%pment Agresemesnt, bietwe:" the - C: Of Rancho _ Cucamonga end Now" Ikva out for the pt►rpase of providing ( : 5 a Senior 3ruei Proaat per the regr►irentlsnts iot the Senior housing Overlay Dhstdet (section► 11.20.0,40 of th��Yelopment Cai+st Ord cue! ZIA) for 17,0 apartment units to be AIL, ated on the fr \�\ south siele of Base Lune .Road, want of Arobhtlral- Avenue - APN: 20"U-18, f0*t1nued , from March 23, 1689), J__ LOPMENT AGREEMENT 94 -02A - NOT7IisE DEVELOPM thxae -parr Development Agreement twesen the C iy of Rancho Cu�tnn6nge, No urs . Development and }West End' Invessttnents for tie purpose of providing a senior twgftl Project per "the regnirenneunts of the C�:xlor $ottsing k 1 iiverley+ D#striot (9esstt6ss 17.20.040 of the Denrelopmet�t Code, j c, +(kdina es '21P for 170 apartment units and office medical l -Comp!" to be located od the south side of loans 14ne toad, 'west 1 Of ArcMeld Avenue - APRs 209- 031-18,19. �; 1 V y� G. WhRONMENTAL AS,S �QE� AND GENE „ZtAL PL � N ? ; AM _ 87-04H - WEST,-- INVE �MhT�" %,, A reque$ o ti men the Land Vise Moment of the Gend �` from w " \Odium Residential 4 A 'dwelling iiriitas pei-0 l to-�� 4 IA9 acres of land, located on thb west sick, of Arehibe.ici kven��e, soup of Bans,• Lana Road - Ai'N; R08»b3 *_ 17, :54, 55,Gd 7. ;f V� (Continued from March 23, x:888) ENYY�RONMENTAL ASS ESSMENT, !)AND' P DEVELOP ME Tt ` $Ii1� A ND � N r" A request to 8016nd tfia Lwelopmeny Districts Map roe► Medi�wc � identia (4=8 duelling Uts per acre), to Off, e Professional for 1.88 acre$ of land, located an the West aide of Arehibold Avenue, south of Base Line, k�oad - AP$t 208- 031 -1 $4, 55, 58 and 57,. (-Oontinued "m Met�ch 23,,1988Y 1. ENVIRfiN 19NTAL kN386MENT AND DEVELOPMENT R9VU W r - vie development Of 170 se r �( <r lVartMInts o . acres o land in the Low Mediu�i'Resident �t s Dbtrict (4-8 4weiling units per am), located on th4 south side 3f ° Bd$e Lim Road, west of ,Arehibodd Avenue - APN: 208 -032 - S. 1.8, Assoclatod with the pro*i is Tree Removal Permit 88..;. 4. (Continuild from 1 arch 23, 1888) �. ChA3DMOOAL USE PERMn 8812 - `tiV -MERN li��JPBN ` f ate went of An tegrat. 03mmun ehopp cent r ing of four ajor retail buiklings totadiV 3 19, a e feed adjctini@g m " shops totaling 137,385 satellite tatail b inga tutaSw 4.'3,550 °t�� feet, ni square, foot, two aateili� a office buildings t sling 27,323 squere feet, four restaurant Pik W., a 30,900.1 �am foot theater. Conceptual approval for a ?dosign centee c i$ti[sg of tart, building$ totaling 185,880 m feet. All k ?1 40M bf land, to the co ." Cbtome District of tha�'etreVistg Ph n nod Como , located . i!l norxhsart �aatebr of_E iven Avenue Ond .,.&M.&wleva 1877- 4214.15t, 06r X13 K. ENVmoNMENTAL ASS98SMENT AND TENT. r"rg n AP l uwcI� re nti r avid d estr, #fie S n L`@��iV . tx r � .a $t. e; a !�$'Singw a�lots an 11 ass o .�tsl •i:+a 3)s Medium IIxY�sidantial Di$triet (4-8 ;• tr:.C` prn I , l aW It on the side" of even etl,i° APNz 201 _��8i7, 88.:; L. VACATNi �Y4 OV POS ACCEng B SMEMMIT M401" ET,N L A Ply y`J r _ ii? -lL1�t 314GA VRW493 a £1 11 S £ °L$31 abk s S 'dtlFi A�Y3"3 d l�$`��R° �3 3a1 ell Y`lS'a� >Yip iY$�iaa ri r: 'arR tCae aY dt!2r% sr Di. oi: (Su �R� g e fec3 Tn_` i; fi €cai�.YRU. #.6a as�a (50pu r ,!7f s eYa Avojiue Grid Aftf., c t ENVj 2r)HitiaRAi" AYt ASSViSI S%2i^ 3�1r 'C`�I i'sF �dCtiz� R� yE k c t nl' f��e t ea I2 3 T O�tTWti OC a temporary ra kir SU075hure to zav*o �' ar�e$iti�rsr��s �fsRCSE3iiy t� be ?tseaa'ed ba the Medii M I)PnAty RcAje:biyai of �aef t (3 rl�te3 rr t(hi# r a «x � 4ce t d E of 66?, T && .ef3Le st dtveS% s — AP14 2027101 7uor�cas gtie9 er4 �$$dTucat a t n r of tTti a Aers e d 93ti :+fire€ - _ P. irTYI JNi ?YII't'A2, faS3 S�ilE T AN ' ��. A! 0 ihiTi �O A& �ndr,�erat t �itafier 17 #c€!� •v %cr atrt Q_,,rtajn &volopme t r�540atlou& fo t ra Y i!I' V idQ*at� y1� AND g_yTERRA *�g�1 ```. a.ai'3x.9ixiRF4 !.'irl6.Ct%s!S°IJI ' i7E aue �� '"'. Adl uFi .5'� 5°°am°.,w,.`aa' . ':.:r'F$•.:gx��ac� "� :.A a'`�$�r�d�r:��t $ti �'�€� ' L`%'#S. Y�w� �°s�y�!a3i6�$@��wT�1' � E ¢+�i�iigi�y��iCab $Q ,2Y"t �IYK'.�'06a �' ^GBVtitSRci2� T�Y� Ir� t CEa YC d VE9I4`r "£iiP wFiP'°mc"6$wim =a EYf ow • y ' +�� ) d» '�f2ffi �.�RS �"? � YRYR�t'�' �� $tE47. it $!�c: "y • i�iYlC��i6 �� 4'.a�4 ..Gs��r.�aE+aa.� ��flv� Edi� es�.^�' �Qiiu�%i�� 1��.d�e1��s ' a p,*�°�'M'tt�3!�F:� �3'�"r�iL A9s .%M; ' t�l:ND �'41��PzaoasY„�a��$P� 23`i i£ �� P R�?d�3 h__ �Eeedie €xiu tiYsiitsg;3cr(3 +f f t; ^ nt!' t (�e��ra. P�:a t�Yrcd� ,� a.. ps^iis, i�td eaaa rrfi 00 ff$iiet�r° s�ni.a xiss �+R.R► a6ld F: t . L0 1 "d{��g0f air, S r c tri :.7 eAs's�;�� a�i3yi&SS4° $tii984afiai' itvP�iifiRi E'er n$t i a Qj r lu. FOOTHUJL FREEWA Y POLICV VIM W", swam 'i�'DESIQX- RRVMW -fl LIA" LY01., T V. TRACTit 13031, no _IL COMPAPY - visi—qn review of tievatioils and plot Plans roz tWO prAVI=Iy OpproVed ;-IonWet) of'�'C , � Jots located"iz 7.1aeres of in the L O"W Do nsf "Ustrict (2-4 dwelft,units per acre) 'Oi t RUW406a located. 0 Avenue, north of. *ie'Une Road and ifjUth Of Od "Avaquez-, APN; 227-49-53-56; 2.17-47-6"ft 'LC. RS & MFUIEK09 Wontinued from March 23z, PL-!6'4M'-VIWI*OX IWOR-9 PROOkiN Y. FAti FOQb STUbY - T* —M—Mity. ror IF "Urti rL Ihis is thp, VIM" id ptaca for the genoraZ iw' 1. t. addrew the COMMWOFiv T&-11 to, be - ii4k=ed here diost Atch 40 -not O�reaq-y'qppedr on this aftowa. rho Plartning Commimion has adopW Adri; 4*utttvc, Regulatlow that set an 11 pm. adjoup;imotit time. If items go beymW Mat timat they Mall be heard ont y with thecc�ent pt the CommfWw*- <; I i;TIt OF RAUNCHO CUCAAWNGA G!3cAMo STAFIFLREPORT- DATE: April 13, 1088, 5 i 3977' TO: Cha4man and tamers of the Planning Comission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 1 d BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 13445 DESIGN REYIEw - VILLIAN LYON COMPANY - Design review ot building elevations, - an, ar,4 lot line adjustment for a previously approved Tract Map consisting of 215 sirgle family lots on 284 acres of nd in the Low- Mediumt� Density, Residential District (48 dwelling units per acre) withip tho Victoria Planned Wvwnity located at the -southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue APR: 227r 0.81 -10, 11, and 40. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action ReguLksted': Approval of building elevations and ptot plans. B. Project Density; 7.53 dwelling units per,,' C' C. Surroundin Land Use and Zoning. 7iorth = acat3 ; Fu£ur 7_HTq-ff7Sahoo1 Site South Southern Pacific Railroad and Vacant; Medium, Density Residential (844 dwelling unitc, per acre) East - Vacant, Mediu Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acrel� West, - Vacant; Proposed Park and School Site and Low Density Rgidential. (24 dwelling units per acre) D. Ganeral Plan Designations: Project" -roppos -' d ark and Elementary School and Site Lots - Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North - Proposed - Junior Nigh School Site South Railroad and Low - Medium OPnsity Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) . East - Low7Medium Density Residential 44 -8 dwelling units per acre} 14eat - Low - Medium Wsity Residential t4 -8 dwelling 4tnit4,; per acres t �C ITEM A FUNNING C .,.ISSION STAFF REPORT TMI T 1„44M�I'GN kZVIEW - WN LYON April 13, 1988 Page 2 > II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: tentative Tract 13445 was reviewed by the Planning l:�ompisss oa on duly 22, 1987 and "s approval for Subdivision and conceptual grading. The applicant ft, now submitting the plot plan and building elevations for design review spproval in order to neoceed vt t coostrVctJ1vn of the,_hmes in the tract: t� B. General: ale applicant pro osed three (3) tlooc plans for the project, , each vi tit three elevations. All homes are two -story and-range in size from 1,215 to 1,632 sure feet in area. The homes (which have not, been built Pret"i2usly `#n� surer of ,areas' the Vict9ria Planned, Commnity) a.re designed to fii on the wide, shallow lots Ott which ti1Ey are placed. of fhR 215 lots 70 (32 percc.�t. of . the tract) have " parking. in - the sine or rear yard (39 "lol.3 With 10 foot grid side yard and 32 tots with :. drive -thru_ garages). C. Yssue: The Engineering Division has required that the r�oeras An X41, 52, 9', and 129 (Ali corner lots) take aeces5 from Tolentino Place, <Belluno Place, Tolentino Drive, *nd Gandino Drive, respectiOily (see Condition 6). The Division °s concern is with traffic safety. Drivers making right turns past these lots may not he clearly visible to homeowners backing out of .(heir driveways onto the streot. however, in girder to relocate . the driveways to the ad Acent, streets, the - Applicant wovid either have to develop a new product to fit the lots or rotate the units, causing rear yams to frar4 onto sides yards. This revision woeld also after the character of the streetscape. The Des( RevieW Committee discussed this :issue at their March mee .ng_ an recow -ends ed tha "mite" r vow s s au -6,y r -M, <ss propose_ e a cant. e Comm] ss on concurs w e?a the es gn ev ow—TUf a reccxnpaendation then Condition " No. 6 should be dele, d. The applicant alto proposes series of lot 'lino adjustments to accommedate the +snit plot Ing. The final tract map (which has °not bee recorded yet) will reflect these: proposed adjustments. C. Design RevfovCommittee: The Design Review Comittee {uhitiea, "l, er c , i,', rev owed the proposal on march 17, 1988 and recommended *r$�roval subject to thA following conditions, 1. The l -eft e7evatic6t of 'P7dn 3 should be revised. The siding above the wi,pdow should be removed and a fascia or band bcardk should extend toward the rear of the unit ft,bM the first story roof juncture with the tecood Story facade.. ,} I r7 PLANNING r•"ISSION STAFF RRpaRT TRACT 13445 DESIGN REVIEW WN! LYON April 13, 1988 r Page 3 2..,Natur,ul, ;tome, should be used fin those elevations featuring stone veneer rather than the t�y-Ithetic products„ Applicant mAy sut,�it alternative stone style to the sat.sfactiv4`0f,the City Planner. , ?h Front yard land%aling on Lot 53 should be 'enhanced. The rproposed` plan Should be reviewed by the City Plawftrer, • 111. FACTS F'OR F"1MJWJ5: The Pr0ect is consistent 'with the Victoria Planne c? un i:"" -40d the 06eral _Plan. The project will not be detri ntal to adjacent properties or cause ,.:significant environmental iop4 ts. In addition, the proposed use 'is in compliance with the appliciMe Prtrvisions Of • the Victoria 4omnity Plan, the 04velopmat Gwde, and City scan 'dards, Ill. REG.OaiF4EMAT'Ii3Nlt Staff recowwnds that the Ptanr#,% Coalssion j approile the desto MAview of Tract 13446 thr{#;t 40ption of the _ lattached Resolution rwixia con0 ,Jtior,$. m Resp AEL F ra ,� City P' Hite , DQti4 �: to , Attachment:;., Exhibit "A" _ Location Neap a Exhibit •9" - Landscape Exhibit Exhfbft to - Site;P ;an Exhibit V - Lot L�oe Adjustment i Exhibit 'E" - F= Suilding Elevations ,i ResOlution of Approval with Conditions { { 4 D a ,m, NORTH �`�� -Al QITY }� RANCHO UCrAMO GA AID 'PLANNING DIVISTOW VP *Vspom 1.1 Tom tam KV "ova" W Imm"oLvAli9 W-Mw lfw MlWtI1RRlf1t7 » 1'iCtlt�t /4iTM'P CC�ltlR OYW bt YM 4pltOf wci MlMRIIMI1w0 P®ln M Mr '. vxlruwsllriaYarm�iea ww aww.o+�srMOa �rtn� 1 '� � saw na wr lolatunro iul. ewc+aia �•"".-. "—A� 1 it ssa a." w at 4tIN -NM i ■R 14i ti d� 4LA.A. R—" n -fi n.. �u'"r. W LOT WK ""v W-1 un ua w AMLwlHlip.W. WIM,D I � 9 HE3uwmaxiw+u [[ iz i n........ IAWEIIIdClwml om � +l "� � 31.i111rtb 1CtlClC HETr1i'DY3IVRLL wrars�e�arwwr ' MAIL /ulm RV. ]$0R"l l CITY OF Q ITEM RANCHO CU0,k)40,NGA ..rr s ' TITLB, PLA NING IVISION � EXHIBIT -./ As ML gig �, } f f UP wt 61 �►�,' j� , try Ow mr We air fa .a t s i ,1� �` t to a '>r�'�"' —�• S t 111POPR --- Wr Lee AWL qq0 v.lt SaF'1Y 91 !U to ira ,Ile � 118 TUB ] eA 4f M 71 '13 tN� xr$ M. ur w „t' � , ., K eW °�a• $ y r< w k. ur ,r. �+ xq 1, ' f.- .�•_�" •'�'z4'_L" '° "o"_ .. _ ERitTCVC LOT L6'`E I A % ':a { �u .Y+ •# 1a 1ss ,a w 1a 10, �x °w- ''1'4 are lre _ ` Pr=S oLOTtrz^ ` 999m v 1ie LOT Ur- TMISITV4ASBA C =mss rk r �r� ,_xv, TCH NB t-o � d a �SS5' BA %%tt y 1 r s Iip 4 a 7• ar �� OV-TMLOT We Ffi:'pw.. GpT U7'E •• i LOV (*r_ TRAtGRXkV aai a C?F i � �� 4� c f 4,N$IN I I I �x � . �. A _ r_ _ e.� �' �. 'C1_ �` .+ f 1" �.as.._�'' -- i..l'k i•�k n ^ }A .. 1 - . w Z 'A !1K A. RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OP. °edit RANCHO, COMMA MA PJ ANNINO COWTStw APPROilK DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT .40. 13443 F J-hE DEVELOPMENT" OF.215 $1ME FAMILY LOTS 09 28.5 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUH 'AttIDENTIAL DI :tT (4--8 DWELLING UUI','S PER' ACNE) WITHIN.: THE VICTORIA �"MM COIMNITY LMITED AT Tit£ UTHWESt CORNER OF ROCHESTER AY£NUE AND VICTORIA PARK LA f'- - APN; 221- 051 -04, 10, AND 11 tals. �",\\fJ The 71liam iyon`Company NO filed 4P applto:(iion for jthe- Desi 3 Review of T-Act No. 13445 as described 1'h title of ��{$' Resoition.,; Hereinafter in this Reso'iution, the sutt)pc e=ric DevelapN Review request t>s -, ferred to is -"the applipAtio"U. „ Sid 4a t� of April 13, 158,9� the Planning Commission of the City of R nchaj ��uc�apon �.e d a meeting to ct;d,�der the application. , (4', legal preregati ;tes a,to the Adoption " of this Resole+ i J have occurreli�%''� NOW, iNEREF iRtf ft .4 1,reby �hund, deters ine ' and r�esotv�d by Sze Planning Come►fssion of tha City of �"cho Cucdmonga as follows: 1 ;i; This fommissi(M hereby specifically fin &1k than alt of tN! facts sit forti`.ri the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ,a tru .And -correct �s~,.pon s�i�giantial�idenee presibd to tuts Commission during the above•r€ferenced meeting on Apm 23, 1968* includirg writteti and oral staff reports, this Commissf, hereby spQtzfically ffrds -4K; follows: (a) That the proposed :PrOJCct it consiztent with the objeo: Ives of the "ral PlarA,--and (b) That # _._�r,Vaposed "design is 3r.,, As:,:rd with the obJectfVd of the Development;. Code and the purposes of the district in whitii the site is located; and (c) Thit. Og proposed design Is in compliance with each Co thy': applicable provisions of he Victoria Com uniV Plan and the Development tode�,,And (d) That the proposed design, t"agether )vith, th��, conditions applicable thereto, will ,`not b� v detrivrital to . the pobiic hea1*o;-, sefe'ty, or welfare, or maiirially Wurlous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. t A..- I I� z, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TRACT 13445 DESIGN REVIEW - WM LYON April 13, 19$8 3. Based upon the f ndings and conblu "Mons set forth in paragraphs v 1 and 2 above, this Cission hCreby approves the application subSoct to each and every condition set forth below and in tie attached Standard Conditions attached hereto ar:d Incorporated herein by this rs airence. (1) The left elevation of Plan 3 ohall be revised. `pia sidiKo above the window shall tea \removed and x fas i &or band board shall ext d tq"w d the rear of tke_`gmyc from the first story _ r eof Junittre with; the facade. socona story , (2) HaturW;l> tqx ..Shall be: used OW" thorn elevatiojrs feitu�ring #one vamr roa r -than -the SY"41et. c roduc%s. Applicant s` bmit alternative stone yles ;,c the satisfaction o,\' the City Planner.- • 1 (3) rite from yard landscaftg on Lot 53 shall be entranced. The propose' plan stl a be revi by the City Planner. (4) A► for to lssuaace of Wi,, ling peearits, a' final acoustical analysis s4,all�, be sabmittM detailing mitigatim measures nee sary to achievo noise_ levels, both inteMor and exterior, t cormi &Rt witiij Ctty standards tog; 'lots abutting. Rochester ue. (5), All pertinent conditions -of Resolotico ' /di -129 approving Tentative Tract 13445 shall apply. (6) The hmes on Lots 41, 52, 94, and 129, shall he revised to take access as follows; Lot � stral( ot�ess �' �� past. Lot 9n shall access from we east. Lot 94 shall access from ti��jh south. Lot 1299 shall access from the sou,':1, F 4. The Deputy Secretary to this CoWe1sion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. e �< APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13"M DAY OP -`,ML, 1988. € PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMW,3A i BY: arty ., I Cnal rman i ATTEST: /A -. E Brad Buller, epu Y ire ary D S Fr C"ISSION RgSOL TIO No. XT'13445 DESIGN REVIEW � MK ION Ap'ri l 13, 198$ Page 3 _ I, Brad Deputy Secootarry of the Planning Commission of 'the City of Rancho Cucasonit, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolueon ryas duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted b,*,rAhe Planning Commission of the ;) City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pidnnip Commission held on the 13th day of AprA , 1980, by the following VoPtw o>wit. AYES: CMSSIOKIRSt NOES: C"ISS1OKL -'S: ASSENT: C"ISSIaNERS:' . o - i _ `I t � J,.- 7 . W N ►� rte. � � u ME- g1 4 pi �" S _ ADM 9141 1A p »Ky Kr1,l lit R", flits IT i n — ,... ft i � 1� p'� ♦ MM IfF ' ;$ tit it's`°• _,•,e.*~. 1 IM y\ He' �u ' SZF an s EMI el !+ q IV I J., �' 4{ �.Iee P, .�yy Ak WAAA fqr 1r? 1 P y R i y PSI IL tit- cs i�M r!• id's M +•L i 4[�R N�(1' �tl ,�as��. r Y A0 �N q 91; 7S A i� ni_b� rr A` y +?�. g S ry yyyyyy FOtit! E'S iti.g Y• q M vizl y. it ¢ ' Ilia 1, . A112 i Am- • a 2RX 8 3 ST air ;C _ 1 ,al tail X4 T4 3 -w i�� m I I ye r g VVff wpr 4�NY, y�. • W Of YyI � 41' .N .„�7'.A NG! 7 fbr .ifYS <df aAt �A r aL HE fi ,Sr r 7•rNA+ �r� A+ 1►�p (`i: yfd Mp; ENE �' � Y� O+ b YW. Mafpp.• M 3 G 7 q !f '^ P r� jay' p Lf y l 'rS rr5 r•wl �pNSfpa9 IS !11 :1�QBC. Wit». ft 'ONNr.S q o.r °' �d�rI o .� wet e° X _ r+. a f! X '�--., r 1•.6 '•'~ r$NN •~r aN N ,2 .: R r l � �C6�n �r pp•11�r6 � O� ®��.� �Aa Ma- Alas in ma �SUP zat at I �p��Ti ��ItC Tf� •.h ■. �a''�r e rye~{ O3X'K N aM "'fir f! ar° ^ZS. A p�9f W 2 A N IR j F r ti b 4�A. 1yi R "$,�'.d'!f ~+ofr.'ww:K g! eN.!' wi wmvu'o � y in! d°.5. ►RA`�,n 'gig X +�.p9 . `bS 6 f�iw N 7 A tq Qy?e9��. fp[ N3 l;Np all Nr�,fA VA, T US �� rah 7'l mS a'Rg'� S'�aR�Spdg R A 'A grab �Viln � »f„�.., rp�$� °'°�rm TY'r"' $�� yi°.+ 4a r�X� Vs. T w p wpO.�mi �y iVT �SagpN�p'�• • Nr iWRi �Y p� fQl1 7c Rpm N W, rka9 yi N�'�V. }rr�pp� �9 '.1u�' INusNr f �� BN ±5f�•� 4 P=fD A N�a �Mf� QyQ 7K Y O M A iTi s '}�ji a x pC� �pgNr•Oz 13A A� G I �b.�1 �A�t. `39 Y� A a :e sx r n o P r �t 0 1;. rtl�01S S fSn� -'lam �n�, .ter' o,.• A a'., y�"� to ii C1 W N �R�r +tea �M 4'/y6� .u� ��ayyr� \�yi� �19.�'J�•1 ��p, A }� �f�kp� �'r �� t ■9'� NCR ®�'3� l'� ��•�.Ii,C, • �,. �° � � y7��^ r N is fil s ` �reJ.3 i n I N 0 N N y I TIC -i E ��' A� $ µ •* a qr w- Q 3w` s ' €g�prti nf�' rr. aK w 71B a e, a PF3 :2 0 P P t* 5r,—, . n n LRnra �e ! ,nl � g "N n. 44 6- .. I Ell Mir H! ,� Rr. � r ,~r,,,�NA NNr°s �. ..,�.« �3'tlio ,�•, rA R.. g�. �. r� l t Bill 4. m bb Sad IM " � ro ii t2�y a as <S� w"�i ti.O tf�.:� m �bT tS �<'lgby �o .z"„f. •wrx �t� y �,[s± IE RE N n RUM pNy ��33 ,� +w,�, vra� >,t cam'. �va X°•.��ysy ,�»+4'� %.a e� 1 NI! a�laA � y31# RU I pp 3 C pp E rn am' y . RUE {� eJb•b b EI ySG=4 vet � uv pf°: eM wyy '� tY ' %�YVN f m aagg��ryq�..' olse� f� {p.:w 2N Z-,V R d _ y� gf . li 38 GL mmN ©V ryyg�. pia n yL}i »`� 9•!A � ,q W'ti � j IE W, a��Y!!� "�4L 2 . h m ws. 1. Ft� W a atr "s 7P 3 ci 4.5,2---2 �$� n a Z, ... _. �'S ti w•• I fir R_. i 7 } �[. 4!'31! 1R W f1 t•Y tl� L I I I IN •r6 yfYa N'y r ii �. »N ~ °JNY jA O _ yy� {p 4'SNw Y of v It ° "�: WMMY p i$u[ f R 'its ar it's MJ s$�y�' air N i 1 Sri M ii a1Y r 3-=N 91 Cal i CLf +mow. d N FbOn n� @ R Y ,{I. d vin 1'. ♦, it �a♦ Ir / mf �I 2p' y .... M G! `I 'I`i�yf►'� S� :2f all r O's 2r 3an'� 'nom '�. .'$'_a $n ns°•R ryy Hu MGR S � �j pp •Tg�� yy� � a �, * pro �O� q r'� � j � e.SA•�'y`°7.g � p�N �n Y.�n o O i M�t) • y a � .. �XY w�' � If P'�s 3 V•} C� Sr_N » =A rti} r_ RN lei ,ate n�. R t • aw,p lJJ.: A`. x.+0.riM `mfr edit ' w'{y�� pT R� 'jai: �3r1� /� ~ �Rq .Si• � ~ya go tit {if t l �( n I w O J C r � R A .- ,_ rm R €p yyy M a --� CITY OF 3ANCHO CUC aNGA S T"F REPO, T r� DATE: April 13, 198$ 11 N7 TO: Chairman and Rz*ers Planning Comission FROM: Brad Buller; Cityanner`` ,1 BY: Brett Hornera`":s�stant Planner \ r %( T 13443 DESIGN REVIEW - REPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT - [assign SUBJECT; I,,� re" ew or ul lding' el'eva ions an, detaTred s pan, for . previously approv_ad tract map consisting of 144` single family lots on 25,53 acres of lard in the LoW- amodium Density Reiidential District (4-8 duelling units per,acre) within th(l Victoria Planned Community,, located at the southeast comer of. Milliken Avenue an1 llictorla Park Lane QN: 227 - 011 -01,, 02, 0) and 227 - 081 -31,4 I. PROJI:C7 AkT (3dTE DESCRIPTIOU. A. l tior ; n ested: Approval of building elevations and plot B. Proj3 n De-is: 5.64 dwelling unit: per acre. G. Surrounding tarid Usp and Zoning, F� �= vacant; Density Resi&d tial 6- M)dwelling units per acre) and Low- Mediui,Density Residential 0 -8 dwelling units per acre) South Vacant; Lowy Density ResidentiaV,(2 -4 dwelling units per acre). East Veca.rt; Low - Medium Density Residslhtial (4 -8 dwelling units per, acre) and Low Density P,lsidential 12 -4 dwtellio units per acre). West - Existing single family residential;. Medium Density !i Residential A -14 dwelling units or acre). D. General Plan Designations a3EC e�- L dT-um- Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per; acre) r North -r Low - Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). Sough' - Low - Medium Densi,,ty Residential (4- 3- dwelling units. ° per acre)., East - Low - Medium 6insity Residential (4 -8 .dwelling' units per acre),; West - Proposed park site and Low- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling 4nits peg'^ acre). y\ 1 1 ' ITFJt -G PLANNING COMh1ISSIO�`STAFF REPORT RE: TR 13443 DESIGN REVIEW April 13, 1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Bac�z�ro_un_d•< Tentative T act 13443 was reviewed by the Planning Martel sid'n: a;a April 8, + 987. The applicant at that time (-,he William Lyon Company) t!aceived approval of subdivision 'layout and conceptual gradirg. The current applicant (Republic Development) has acquired the Site and is now submitting plot plan and buiidinr, elevations for design review approval. B. General: ftunlic Development proposes a�/ggt�ew product of tk� ee T37-wo- story floor plans,, each will th4'ee elevation design schemes.. The homes range in size fMm 1,873 s�,guare f *et in area for ,Flan 1 to 2,163 square feet in area for'Plan 3. Plan 2 has 2422 square feet of living area.. All of the units gave three (3) bar garage7.. This product is similar to their Victoria Pointe project 'in Victoria,, Groves Village. The applicait -is providing the required number cf recreational vehicle storage spaces; 36 (25 %) of the 144 loth hava -a 10-feet wide side yard for RV storage. { C. Design Review Comittee: The Design Review Ccaw.ttea (Emerick, ea, ro�i rev awed the proposal on March 1 1985 and recommended approval suhject.to the following conditiof;: 1. The rear'and side elevations on all units should, be enhanced through the use of wend trim, stucco,detai'ling, G window planter boxes, or* similar arehitectUal eta ants. fie revised architectural ' plans should be reviewed by the City Planner, I1I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Victoria Planned 01=unii-°and the General P. � y lam. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant enviranmental impacts. Yh addition, the proposed use is in 'f compliance with the applicable provisions of the Vi(:toriaCnity Plan, the Developvnent Code and City, standards. i IV. RECOMNDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission f approve v; a design review of Tract 13443 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions P Re a ful bm- ted, i ' ad 8 er Gi an 88 :BH :ke ' Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" Site Plar, Exhibit "C i Building,11evations Resolution of Agprovai with Conditions �— `� s NORTH RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: SM67 PLAN O JTEM: 08 r_ a3 gL13 PLANNING DIVISION F'xkilBIT: 6- t� l NORTH RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: SM67 PLAN O JTEM: 08 r_ a3 gL13 PLANNING DIVISION F'xkilBIT: 6- `' ---------3t- PT f•} s w F�1 �`� 0o � �t` P s � • � ♦� \`l 1. -. riff' r ��.,r IT • C.v�♦ a C J�/�jpntlµ ISi � i •i. Vbj� caGnut�neAcf PEGiNO IIt �� •.. �i' . %. �41cAtNZ '�Y4uM1r. •�! �V alef NORTH C-1 TlY OF RANCHO WOAMOyGA TITLE: � PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT., 6-2- o °.a I a E CITY OF ITEM.. ,,- SXMBIT: CAI, : ., .�..r •�`l I LEFT ltd r _ •e. Tom• REAR CITY OF RTE: A CJf Lv CUCAMONGA T1 L . 51- EV *TIONS _ HIBIT...... - SCALE: D .r LJ T r fa nT ITUM: Pip, rX 13 W13 i v RANCHO CUC PLANNING DIVISION e f [ <.•r rat -i fit'' Yea, r. ♦a .t. ��.{� i t ° ud e j REAR amov '' ITEM. DR T 134, i N%dl G r ; )IVISIO EXHIBIT -9Z SCALE: : -+-' -" !. :. t'. �, �,° .. .fir +;'. El f,s}w ,,. +•moo, n ki • b �I ..rW py�til'y..•irM.. , �,is.. , r..• • w I �w .rte;, -,.., •.:�+, ' u WNW OF 1," >j RANCHO UC A TITLE: � �� i JVs 2A- PLANNING, DIVISU , sp a CITY OF ITEM: DR- _,,,,i.LANCHO CUCAMONGA' TITLE: Ej:E�-tMtq$ RAM INI DIVISION ,,.� EXHIlIiT. 1 1', T x t ji!z WOR 4 r I ITEM: TK J 3 q43 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: _ 7 d' EXT �A �I� \•� '�� +uriis}IIIw /11`i —r I f�al�yN. l a. 1 � ♦�. ''Yn M. M� riHW -. l� . Y4YUi■■An11.ar.■■ aY _ JY1 1 n�n■�.tl 1 i�irlil y .wl ■41. 1 r+ �/i�11. w ^�• 1' 441 N l t1F i R i R� aM 1 �IRt 1 ■tike.. I.■ � It 1lPtll. s c .* t (PIPI Y/lrgs:Ir�SiP \. 4ky!Ilk kl; kyti,��YM( �� jCC PIIPiitq ll�O'... 4�IIOL.1�{ 1rrI�1P IIII• y r ��. d��+1N Yi,tr.• ��0f' •PPP W it /Pr r♦iis•iPHI P" �Y. ril ,. v.r - .Y, ►I/f�,_ Sri ii i� ■ I� IFL r Balm OR ^ M y r fr` E r ` ZF J. RKW yy �f'V"t�t ti' �.i; a�, �. "lN'y1 n�y�'j.•� rl REAR 41CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � �: c.fYA�AfWS -� �v . PLANNINC DIVISION EXHIBIT r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOMM PLANNIKICOIMMISSIOlt '- APPROVI'' DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13443 FOR THE 0EVELOPin -T OF 141 SIWXE FAMILY COTS ON 25.53 ACRES OF LAND IN T,.,.�L t- €OiU!! RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 -8 DWELLIK � UNITS PEP. ) WITHIN M tJ�M�kl E VICTORIA PLANNED CNITY �UCATEO, AT T QUit AST CORNER OF` MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE'; APN 227- 011.01, 02, i}3 AM, 227 - 081 -0Y ; A. Recitals. Ia. 1 !}RP-public Development Co. has filed an application'tor Design Review of Tract W. 13443 as described in the title of this Resolution. I Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the appiicationa. , (ii) On April 13, 1988, the Planning Comfssion of the Ci'fiy of Rancho Cucamonga cc,,ducted'a meeting on the aoplication Ali' i al rere isites to the ad ti"on ar this Rosolution e9 F +'W op have occurred) 8. Resolution: `;.� NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved b y tHl� n Planning GSimission of the City. of Rancho Cucamonga as fo11'ows. 1. This Commission hereby specifi�4�ly Ands that all of the facts r `� set forth in the Recitals, Part,A, of this Resolut� � are true and Corr ;t. 2. Based upon substantial evide ce prese.z ted to this Comreis; ion during the above - referenced,- poeting on Aprfi 13, 1988., including written and ` °,al staff reports, this Comtiission hereby,speifical1y finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project Is �dnsistent with ';►R objectives of the General Plan; and' (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purpases of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is. in compliance with ear �t 0 the applicable provisf-nns of the , Victoria Community Alan and the Development Code; and (d) That' the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable , thereto, will not be n detr "mental to the publiz, health, safety, or welfare, or materially fnjurfous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: TR 13443 DOIGN REVIEW April 13, 1988 Page 2 3.. Based upon toe findings and conclusions4ez forth in- paragraph 1 y' apd 2 above, this COWssid*l hereby approves ti* app�,�lication vuj ect to each acrd every condition set form' below and in the atjached Standard Conditions :4ttached hereto and incorporated Urain by this ref4rence. (1) The rear and side elevations on all units shall be enhanced througl� the use of woad trim, stucco de'rail'ing, 41ndow planter boxes, of similar architectural, ,elements.. The revised: architectural plans sF)all be reviewed by t'rre , City Planner. 41a (2) All pertinent conditions of Resolution 87-50 approving Tentative Te4ct 13443 shall ilpply. (3) Prior t`u_i,ssuance of building permits;, a final acoustical " analysis shall be submittetr dealing with mitigation measures necessary to achieve noise levels, troth irsterior and oxterior, consistent with .13 Standards -for lots abutting Milliken Avenue. (4) The landscaping and grading on Let 99 shaf.',hot obstruct the 'line of sight which extends from the driveway on Lot 59 across the front ��nd side yards to Verona Drive. 4. The Deput)! -t cretary to. this Commission- shall c;\rtify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY"OF APRIL, 1598. PLANNING C"iSSION OF THE CI'(Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry . e , a 7man i ATTEST: Brad "Buller, epu r Secretavy j I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning- Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga -do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutson was duly and j regularly intro.,,, .; d; passed, and adopted by thy, Planning Commission of the k City of Raicho Cucamonga, at a regular maeti'ng of the Planning Commission held l on the 13th day of April, 1588, by the following vote -to -wit: c AYES: CORWSSIONERS: NOES: COMMtSS10": EN T: C MIONERS: 04 i ggforw c a Iry 4 'fps ; =ZwIE Ulu �,� IZ dm ra p� ffis flyyT 4 «� 29- fin_ w frill! irl, U-4 N „ Y M t� tj * = _ _ k `� -� aka Mi d N� I a + N Y V C —M�a¢r � qY M �a TL %a -� �gn _ o ow mar � fM Y Y a lul I ul 1 oG h ! � ' RM I! Y ` C yp. R Y N V4� 2 gT �qS l p $ o as u W * llp ` W �y [ I 3 34M Y NA «• Y; _ fix Y u ■ YwaN � �•~s5I� h +M � .' t•� �� O O •. y $mow s 3+• r° 4ESL N 1% • e " Y g .1ju `g 1533. w S M Y ta -.� 3 t y I� w L% 1-42 I` S a mR Asa a w` Nn'«c..w�i oy`.1'S QX a jai N S ° Mee a'x _ • �Y N �w . s?fN i psi QygQ� e c� N� a� �s 6wMk �� °Y• 79M N urµp ��nY• 8 gV �a`i its O 1`, J g1 w ° d O w =1J" 1 Lf. V rt��t yq„ b .Y I N Co a '� P• WI ``Y•�1 qp y y �Wa �Y .f V • .v% � �� `y 1n N �i it t u +t wii ►- a� 1N ps xi -fb Car M �~ TL Shy X p +' M M M IvO � awl V M 6 yrV�y i� ss lip T M r IF y ASY � r� h3t 1 Y C IL •� a N 4 T Y1 i� t: bu 3, F Z .x; ML V j1 PO Nro d� a> Y�Mq. cot 4 ui , N w ^.Y Na NMV. kt•'l'1 d4�� gYq� d yg` �µAj � 1N •+i�q. ��y�{V nyN gN tj }per y`yps �. ,g$yGt u� V Ly�yN�j. "like w ��'•• N�wM ��w�'S „r• 1R,��..� �.• 14, ARA in, N u Tim S,i � C'°'+i ,.o. �•- � � „°- i� � � c w� T a ii+e`�ea. � � a �� +aH"��' y� ,��iy:•i�° y� �pw. SO 9V QI �wi, wM., N,M y"ss. Ty, �p y�}:h u Y`: t.¢pyu .. '� 4° ii ! Hf� m�-0 2 � 1MpSS Aai vY' f °b� "�� '�,ny. Y! �' Vl ,�� iT� gJ ✓• � r.� a� www w ai F. w ;1_4 'glum uw�v.9 Sia°Q'i.CT a• _ s� ♦�`S3sfy�� °i %� are r�i3{ u�, y qN °i �� y�y. Y � •� _�f , n _� �•[Ti a:w. Nw� `''y1 q:L �i ,[yw• F a[0 U3 J E. a�yPw �: +ci�« 3a`�+catn ��,�., u ;J vil 4 2 -1 i� SIN „, s a ski ud�� {p a 1A, ! at5pt T 24 y fit tis€w 1 � , # -fill IV*” , N fill �kS Yf> = as 4+� -0-11 3i pt ^j�pz��! «�{.! q; s g Y C` Cali 1 m'ipn 3~j• i� s�r�� Cl �i� � 3i 5 QM- Iy7 ,, +-- w, Y 1 w y �.. ,may •� "Wiw l A "r I '4 q � `A� le }kYYi 71Y. IL J. y N L b R M F °" V. fit ~ EF M y�y' .1 g �� ~ y. -,i 3i S.4. ^� - n.� j) grit J1 fd MM .J t» Yom• M. �a d yr d iY as wt 'v� a .o-.• R �� ak !.R�$ 8� ~�� v :iJJ9✓�of # VP 5 7• ~� 4 f7fsr 4 � 61 �QF tl>6y A�. Nil N � �s QNq a iY ILL- ,..�._,_..,_ .x_._,.11, --- y, ------ s.. ASU .R » f ��1 �i�T; I. '• Q AjC� �; �. �w gp•4�V �� .. ic h _ vy �R9 t � �� i �' ��:�,��'��,, a�.�t.✓� its- ��iya�� , ' �� ! I� � �� j i �M^ �n 0 v ate Si Y Zs� NI 41, +. lEvti vazi yes y]� MR GG Al {tt`{`hh }]jq yy � I y 7 _i 1Yy• t i p6 N Mw NN f4. M tl M air I to 23.1 r ,.pg$pe�� p« � {i� /y «� q g9 � Lya +�'yYz oho �a GY Yw•YR. N w , G_ , may ^M. 4 � : ■ 6=1 tl .. F j fit l� y ♦p rm •u NY N..Y �� r7. {. Y� 1=w A!�R., ��Y ,j �,,' ��y Nq•. ��M Y�� ,. ��. q� ;.� M� rw�a61. �; �•Lp@ �ta� �.A:�i YL 6•!2 c -c � C. X,. ac a 4: 4.6. wK O..`iti.O ZqW 1�^"N�1 STAFF L PG' DATE: April 13, 2588 1977 TO: Chairman and Mambeljs of the Planning Commission FROM., Brat Buller, City Manner M.� BY. Brett Horner,, AssJj�taut plannar SWJECT: TRACT 13722 DESI rVIEii - WILLIO'_-LYON COMP.A�tY - Design ' r�eAvii eww o yy previously ,approvd e eva : ons e e si an, far �' trac" snap consisting of 120 single family lots on X4.67 a4res .of,, land in the towz;*dium Density Residential district (4.$ dmiling unitF,,0Lr acre) _ within`, the Victoria Planned 64mmnity 40cated st the northwest corner of Millikf�n ,Avenue and Victoria Park Lane APH: 202411.13 and 14. t } I. PRWTCT AW 141E DESCRIPTION: A. Ac�,,fion Requested: Approval cif. building elvations and Viot 'pTanS. B. Project Density: 4.$6 dwellling units per acre, C SuI I. 1i U t aiti,T LHtt)"A; 1 ". , Worth - as a'n "tare T Comasercial. South - Single FZily Residential; Medium Density Residential. (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). East - Single Family Residential; Low- Mediu* Density Residential t4a8 17 119 units per idre) and Medium Density Residential ( 14 dwelling units per acre). hest; - Vacant; Medium Denstly ti ,- ideniial .(8-14 dwelling units per acre). , D. General Plan Des i nations: Froj ec • A =. Me Densi ty Residential '(14 14 dwelling units per acre). Korth - neighborhood Commercial. South - Park Site. East - ic.Ddium -High 8en5i -y Residential (t4.94 dwelling Ufits.,; ' per acre)`arA Law - Medium Density Residential R -$ '. dwelling units per acre), West - Madium -kiyh ':aftlty P.esideiiiUal .14-24 dwelling; vnits per acre) and LOWJ Wiut Density Residential (44 dwelling units per acre). o� C �� PLAMING COMMISS109 STAFF AEPORT RE; TRACT 13722 DESICaW REVJ1 V Page 2 y Vp (' 11. AidRi_ YSIS: - A. Background: Tentative .Tract 13722 jtas reri d •;;:,the Planning o ar s"i"an on O.bar 14, 1987, aw ww,s app1wer;, for sr ^bdivis!an dt"stgn and COM tual grading. The applicant is now submitting V plot plan} and building elevations for design review approval in Order to proceed with ccastructign of the bmesf General: The applicant. proposios three (3) floor plans for the pro ec , each with thr o elevations. Plan 1 (1,700, square feet) is a orA *start' !grit, Obilt plans 2 (1,965 lint) .square and 3 {2,140" Muare fOW - are taro -story units. Of t N, 1$0 lots, 40 have .,recreational" vehlele storage area in the aide, yard, which ` Xceids tht ruiniMM Victorio C0101uhity Plan reguiroment. Also, 14 of the hopss ha' €' va three ca,,,, garages. C. teen; n Review Ca�ittee : The Design Review Ci)aa*ittee ( terick� " sir e , SOU re"'y e"d the` proposal On t itch 17, )E and reCOMended approval 4ubjgct;to the following C + }rafiifans: 1. The t ht -e : car gsrages; driveway, approacha4 shoo d 6d' 20 feet wide at the curb. ` Z. The enc7asr<d garige space for a 'Wed car or recreational vehicle in the �!Mes with three Car.garagos fj MMld be a -at 91q feet deep. 3. Natsrart stole should be used on otiose elevation„ feat!MAV: stone venae :rather than the synthetic preducts. Ap licant my submit altirnative -stone styles to that sari' ; fiorr of the ii' y Planner. 4. The ream and side `elavations on all ariU should be Onhanced through the vse of wood trim, stucco detailing, Window plantert bakes, Sr similar architectural el0;atents. The revised arct fii stural : plans should bC reviewed by the City Planner, 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS, The project i4 co:txdstent Frith the 'YictorI4 aI"nne Orteurrt: y and the ;general Plan. The praieCt Will trot e letrimental U 40ACL properties -:' or iau.,e ;; rigntficxnt environmental impacts. In addition, the proposer)'ose is ir. Compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria COMAunity Plan, ,rGhe Development code and City Standards. IV. R.EC41RDATION Staff re,., nus that the P /,' � ing Coftissl4n ' 3onrove -"� esign review of Tract 13722 through the t',doptloe, irf aitached Resotux Ion, With ConditiOnsf R 5. y pp �k`ti�N ' ,^, � , MIN AlAlccl�l 11, 1 gyp,. ` ti ;;� ��' �� c��y -: � —� :- �•,- __ �j I at x P 4 of OW xIIJ o r• ®' 'S `'a rQ�A4 WALL WTALS i ;� P; y 6 �.> .;'`i.''° I : � �}� � +! • } +.� a �a,"� �+ uwkuACw I.t -'+jW _,t1t x,!; ' dx • coa �ua¢uM aus.oacrw. C� -ojs� m +ori:Q+`i'J�etryL:�W i� P� t`�..�� 7; 0I. `t �� ice, i`:•ye +! � ..'. � ►z (`t x n j LU wt *f IN MAFt�i. f NORTH RAMIRO AMONQA TITLE. 51, 070T-02 0 4 -13 =8$ PC, Agenda � .2 of 6 lr=mm - =- - - — PESO UTION NO r j A RESO! 4iT "CN OF '`:t4:E RANCHO CUd:n�u i+ ...�; :o: ' C. ?�c�erast<< f APPROVING DESM"N REVIEW FOR wTRACT 1372- FOR ,ThC,' DEVELOPMENT OF 126 „SINGLE FAMILY, COTS ON E4.67 ACRES OF-) � LAW IN, THE LOW- NE01W RESIMPFRTIAL' DISTRICT f4 *1 DWKLINq UNITS PER ACRE) WIYHIM THE VICTORIA PLANNED C LAITY LOCAT O AT THE NORThVEST CORNO OF MILLIKEN., V WE ICT%TkPARK LANE APR: A. Rc7ltals. M ry William Lyoi Co, has i:1la,,an application for Design Review, of 1-, -ci fits 13722 as described in *; title ofothis Resolutibfi. Hereinafter' ii .his Resolutions- the subject DRxf Review request is referto& to as "the application ". (11) On April_ 13, 198.8, 'the Planning Comission of thole City of Rancho Cucamengal coructed a ieoif,4 oft: 06 application, All legal prerequisitra;�to the adoption of thiq! r� solution have occurred }� �', �_, B. Resolution Aftk i+C , THER ORE, It is; herofv, Fri. ;deterained and resolved by the Planning Commission of the cflwof` RaOlc.�.uc2 on4e as follows, �. This Comeission hereby sptCifiaally fl�ds that atll of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A' of this Re oluti�� ,a4fe true and correct. 2. Based 'upan substantial evidence p>- oted to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on April, 13, 1988, including yrritten and oral staff reports, this Commissionszoby speci:fically finds its fallo ?asst (a) That the proposed'46rojm,t is consistent with the obj--actives of the G6eral Plan; and 0) That the proposed design is in accord with the f objective of the Development Code and the pu�,00ses r of the district it] which the site is located; and E (c) That the proposed design:, is in'cwpliance with each I of the applicable, provisi *nz of the Victoria Comm pity Plan and the Development Codex and C (d) 'That the "proposed design, togother )Pith.. the conditions applicable thereto, wftl ''not-, `be detrimental to the ..public health, safety, or' welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c �J c xt PLANNING dWISSLON RESOLUTION NO. RE: TR 137, 2 DESIGN REVIEW , April 1.3, lleS Page 2 3� Based upon the findingk and conclurivrij set forth in paragraph 2 and 2 above, this Comois inpn ber-eby� proves the application subject to-each and surer; c ,dicion Set fdrth bels)Mr And In the attached Stat0ard Copdt ions attached hereto and incorporAted, herein by this ref.arence. (1) The three car gauge driveway apgroachn shalt: be 20 ,t feet wide at the curb. ' {2} The enclosed garage sp�e for a third car or recreaticnal' vaW le in the homes with three car garages s, aj be a minisum of 25 fc -st; deep. (1) Natural Moos shall be used on those(A ai ovations fz4turing stone veneer rather than the synthetic > -pro Aq —k, *4, Applicant my submit al ornative stone styles t� the7 satiss'«ction- of, the City Planner f> (4) - Mi'tcrear' -and side elevatiors 4 ,`��:I units sha l ye o nhanced through thj� use of " trim, rr stucca detailingt, i,adaw planter` boxes, or siaf t4� =. architectural - elements. 'the revised architecturaY E plans shall I be reviired by the City P ianner. (5) Prior to issua ce of building .permits, a final acoustictl analysis shall be s.b0itted ,detailing rniti9400 meas4res necassary ti achieve rioise,., levels, t-,)Zh interior and exterior, consistent with City Stanc'ards for lots abutting Milliken Avenue, (G) All ; pertinent conditions of Fasolution 87 -177 ll approving Ten»,ative Tract 13722 shall apply. 4. The Deputy Secretary to this Co mission shall- certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AM ADOPTEC 13T11 DAY' OF APRIL. 2988. PLANNING COM14ISSION OF THE t— OF RA NG CtirMONGN 8Y• arry�T;'Multi; cot rman ATTEST• Brad Wier, Deputy eGre�,:,,r _� . p py� y or d r. � M a Y O Y• A f g g an ry . +� y y" P¢e.� —AR, A _ �9g4� �`yL�+ J�Jis k" tb� .v VL CO Y w A Via OW w�az ^mac �wa - 1 9 th a 3�- "saq� Eli saw g - al- •R: Eli' g, Y� W (tilt w w a a ►► r��. gal ff t =" " `i Wag.bp� MM gw I, c--1- 1, •� K.... ..�y. i1 'rIi A si I,i! Ara u rSe -� is /f Ime 3-23M. Isd QZ g u° lis A Sir • ..0 lip ig axiv cal i n S.• .h;� °L' SAN I Jam I Lm MM `�� G � M'. k rgC -+f 1; a • N N4j• 5 JTI CfC Mme' wM Psi K v.pp y�iQi p Rw ^ N�M N pit IYC y "r. Y••♦ yrg Yi a� Mi •. �Ip'.. Y•a� i �1a y�4 ��• V. ploy 1 W t'� �plY. `.YK �4 y�iYNay Q1[Y {. tlVV t Y l2 k r; J Ip. o. : ° Q. Y. V _� � �� lo- �'n � .1Q�. 6 a �1�j{$i� I? 4 ay.yy� t �� C� .L1 �M •Y OP OYMw� �wk Z S q L r get i1 $� j �� O # 5 � - •� �g er r N A 8$ '1« �S ;"� o,.N' w'� � Y� v i:;F �6�� t; «rte w� ♦ VS isIII 7: +�i N N o. h ,y w. ter°•• It +� it w �Qr x�tFff� 'rES» Ya i93 « Till is yr +1. aTi ii w @ is a Itaj s �v� +Nip � H ` .L�LYy� ■�u.� - YF ��f ��(�i'�O'Y y Oi �� s � �yiar rte" is AYR iW i�T.1 ~. t f V r Zu t is Y Mx qY .- Z�as a PC toll *V jsuz gtj MIS RENE is +EY As - Cn��+r� is t v. 1 Su . V 9 p r j garw 4s � rN � a.aww K � r� . - GW S y J N KLl �9 r+ONwwcz w wX'mis7Sw.°. U i4 tam a Nis =i` � W N; rA 3 �$ J! =S ilt at121 Sir. NQ. v �. jtCa i FI a Y t WOl C C f^ i A 1 uY.eJJYU�Ct � fa{ � i a t Y o ag e�p4R qtl a.P N Vlo y qy.. TL a C' `,� M4`fi t yam{ ) f� s. yq c rY~ 1 \Y' mpy�'4 }ys ylr tea' q,�{M�pp® BYi1U? � �aF �a�i �� r "�ji ��' An a t �4 iii +"�wr R°e -an �.._ 4_ �"'itsi. � u� s.. ++f. b,iR v Y�c .uRyY N � Qy E i6 N 9-11 b=1 ��M{N1s/ {$y�� v C qL � NNW #ems 4 NQy,�'.�i tS °. r•Myi �0y" y� � �J[ dN C �� 1{1 N Yo �S iV�rt 1��9�` 'K �Lw�4�4 �R^i iti'N. iit sy6 y ■CM �� e Im n r 40 6 s s -- 4 gig ill ^say' c 4 _ R 123, s _ _ �s1 r ■e3 r� K r A 43i ill! ^ �g3 0011 1z^ j _s 3 24 yj Y a yy ` +y a` {� � i Yry p p11 y AC YY Nei A ! 4r iy µ ■4 ■� yM ` alb li. • � a � N{Y� N 4 4 ..� K! 1 -of,! iYY A 4 »Y U ^a�Tlw $�ii yro � py �M111 � V Y WNF WYti G r A 43i ill! ^ �g3 0011 1z^ j _s 3 24 yj Y a yy ` +y a` {� � i Yry p p11 y AC YY Nei A ! 4r iy µ ■4 ■� yM ` alb li. • � a � N{Y� N 4 4 ..� K! 1 -of,! iYY A 4 »Y U ^a�Tlw $�ii yro r A 43i ill! ^ �g3 0011 1z^ j _s 3 24 yj Y a yy ` +y a` {� � i Yry p p11 y AC YY Nei A ! 4r iy µ ■4 ■� yM ` alb li. • � a � N{Y� N 4 4 ..� K! 1 -of,! iYY A 4 »Y U r k I {� ,a Sir gyp' r M YY � is '"3 Ra y{�w 4 Ci � C *1 I tit 't « R 2. _7t u � � € ou ymlit9,4 <, 5X11 i Ji IN 3 --- x J4K 3 �a5 ,PF'r � ij*•� M _ fix #a 1 ,. b Y {i Y1 Y Q W M N A Y 1 V py a a a wA W vpi 4 OIW Y i W 1 \// in(Y J , U Y Q " wr 5c w� is l Ut a amp r a �iy u ypE y CAM x G E'er :�� ' u \✓ ��A r � t �;•« .�� d is IL IMI all ItZ 03- U2 x Cy Nw Yw It �VVM � m ` ^y'po y yyOI .T. t71 ; /M M O *~•�L �0 v V w i 1y.�q Kw� ` p�•�p`" d ' _Y � wZq w "+•A'4R K N. H NM 2tar 'C 4�i C�v�. •4Z A. ��R..„ !� i V K YM1 l++ce f�. app M C LLi i�w f%•w Z AM V 4 K Ni •p ri �• r� � :r ik Q 7 • r,y r.r 0 C _J ru: FROFt BY; SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONG STAFF REPORT April 13, INS Chainwatt and umbers of the Planning Cofti2sf Brad Buller, City Planner. Laren Handerson, Senior Planner iaV1ROtElJIAt ASSE !tl` AND G5 AI PLAN " �1� lei - A 1ti! l�a 4� Land, _ se k - Low- Medi`ium RoOdentW ! units per acre) to High Residential (".30 s� V.4 a v w# _;far 5.05 acres of land:. located side of Use Lint, Road, west of Archibald- A 208. 031 -It. IS, (Continued from Karth V3, 19 dwelling units p:kr aCre) atUchee(, iih- theTSn' Overlay District ISH(Ali to the -'bast distri' acres of land, located on the soutl: Biqa e Rind, west of Archibald Avenue - APN.- 2' (Continuod frog March 23, 1M) DEVELOPFIEW AGREEn -NT 87 -02 • fiatlLSL GENE and Nou ars bevel '� op�eent for t:;+e' purpose of Senior Housin Project per the ail ee c u 0 Housing Over ay ';listrict (Section 17.20.( Development Code, ordinance 211) for '170, gip& to be located on, t:Se south sido of hse tine R Archibald Avenue APH: 208- 031 -18, 111. (CO, March 23, 1988) t)£YELtIPFlEli3 AGREEMENT 87 -02A COURSE -DEVE ree -Par ve .npmen reeeen a ert Rancho Cucamonga, wourse Development and invest"'"ts for the purpose of prov dtng a Sell, Project pPr Ite reguir"nts of the Senior Hou,;J District (Sectin- 17.20.040 of the Dave'lal,! `Nfrrance 211r for 170--.apartment units and medical complex to be l ocat►d on the south Une R ad, west of Archibald Avenue APR: I9. � u ITEMS V PLANKING CIkMISS16! ST�WF RESPORT RE: NEST END A NOURSE - . April 13, 1988 Page 2 ENiF1RowEnAL A;�SESSMENT GENERAL Pim AMENDMENT 87-(Ali T`EI�"IlT9E - raga amand the Land tWe_ %, eme'ient Af -we- genera flan fr LOW- VAdium Residential (4 -8 d�;r)ing unite per acre) to Office for 8. ?^4Lrey of :. hd, aocated oil the west side of Archibald Avenues sotath of Base Line Road - APR: 208- 031 -17, 54, S9, 56 ,.,rd _67. ( Continued from March 23, 1988) EK'tl'1 ASSESSMENT AND DEYELOPM& DISTRICT STMOM A :•e`ques to seam a ve opaaaaa s r e s P froaR Ow um Residential (4 -8 dwelling units__' itr acre) to Office Professional for 1.69 acnis of Unom >, located on the west' sfde of Archibald Avenue, south oil, ,Dose Upo Read - APN: 20*43147,, $4, 55, 56 and 57. (Continued from March 23, 1988) 1. ENYIROf$MENTAL ASST. tdT AN) EIEYELOPMd6idT REVIEW 8733 'v'` c - The or seen or spar n s '66 K us ac is of Yand in the ')'.1rm- .Medium Residential District (4 -8 dhvIling units per acre), located on ,t!ae south side- of ease line road, west of Archibald Avenue - APO: 208 - 031_1€; 19. Associated with the project is Tree Removal ?emit U-14. (Continued from March 23, t988) Et�vIRONM €. A'- ASSiSSMENT Afro DEVELOPME U REVIEW 234 - TiEiT"'El�i- , TS"<"1n`rI devetopownt o a_2*t�4Ti i%juare of00 "c !pica ci buiid.1pq on 1.7 acres of lard ,"'( the Lar- Neditm Re nt�tal Di �:rict ((1e;aeral Plan hilendment t pending), locate¢ on the west side; of`Archibald Avenue, south ale @slag V a6 Road - APN, 2(*: 031 -t7, 54, 56, 66 and 57. Associaftd with the project is Tree Removal Pet-.it 98,14. ►y;.atinued from March 23, 1988) I. BAr:KGRMHO: These projects was reviewed by the Planning Commission et , e r meting of March 23, 1968. At that meeting, a decision was made U continue the public hearings to April 131, 1988, since _. j only three Planning Cor,:n3ssioners were present and additional information was desired by the Commission. In general, the Commission appeared to ije in favor of the senior housirg project, but was concerned over the proposal to re-designate the i- 6hibald portion of the site, to Office and to permit th* :ievel,ment of a medical offi:,ri, a�jcia'ityr. Specific fisues, were raised csncerninR both land asd a�.d the Development Agr0maent portions or., the ` project. A copy of *the prQvicus staff report dated March 23, °1988 Is included for information purposes as Exhibit "A ". The specific issues rklsed concerning the tkevelopment. Agreement ward as follows. : o The Cowlssion wanted Paragraph ld of the Rpvela ent Agreement to he changed ip indicate '•that 1-f the ftueralm sta d rd for determinint "1O income" was discontinued, "County of ;in 9ernardina , adn;,` t w "City of Rancho Cucaimnga" � ? rsA median ince would th�~v.,used as the new barns of determining qualified incor"e Tevers. o The proposed Devel�pment Agreement targets 3dst Sift ..�= ''the Prdposi_i units rei*ved as rentals restricted to gvC'ified persors of low and � mo�dtrate incomes. The COMissitir. "400d prefer to see a ,minimug of 75% of the units reserved for qualified persons,, and to consider the ;eossible Aeans for fee i waiver :. ✓cr reduCtions to then make this project eeon=ically s feasible. f_ r o PrPJect alternat:yer- a Thf Planning Cotmission was uncertain to their Wtend6i 1corsse of action regarding the office site'. i Three alternative% scerarisis are suggested. The first scenario would be to" approve h :h sites, fv- development, and subject to a ttjree - party 4ey;6.opmolt agreemen6 oet"en he City, ., Mourse ;`Dev�lopsper : and' West End Investments. This three Party agrettieKbas beer, developed by the City Attorney and is e„closc-i ts:: `review as Exhjhft "C ". However, this agreement --w3s not del iered to staff until April T, 1958 and therefoW coRwents by staff aed applitants wi11 have to be made at the Commission meeting. The purpose o► this three- agreement party I& to, extinct the parawl jrs of the development agreement to control the development d the office site development to`tnsure; A. It is developed concurrent with the senior housing project, and B. The site development is restricted to the &pproved development plan., per Development Review 87.34. Me second ,con -rrfo woad be that the Commission approve the were the this tcnec went conditions ditionQ orapprq at d ;seed to be included indicating the ;enter housing project Ate cannot be built until such tire as all neces�or;y drainage and access easements are obtainers ever the adjacont parcel. In addition, if "- t 1ecorsd scenario is chosen, the.. C omiss on i i1 ; indicated that th, / would like to see the 1.59 atl�?¢ parcel .:'be shown with a master fop future plan developme t Q�� t i c� PLANNING COWLS SON VAffi'J�RPORT RE: WEST ;s b a NOURSE April ism A third project scen&rioa is that the COMM12sion consider the applications as one coeplete project and reco4wnd dtrnial of said dow4o nt to the 7ty Council. The spoclfic issues raised cahosrning, fart use were as follows: is �evelast Rarfer: Is3krs , 3 A. Traffic: With the potential change in land Use ed ationd, the t,Cc isslon expressed itorcern about Y additional traffic generated frog the into sites. The ij Present tow - edium,, Residential Distrit.t x'4-0 ciwaT7i�r� -_ l units ber etef*) would accs�odato roughly 39 single family units ,(Using the+ aid point of the doens ty range) ao!d ` generate abrOt 390 vehicle trips peer day. Th,� majority of these trips old "occur ;t'; -peak hours�,�? P.M.). The caafoi* apartment pNject W� ]G - ^rate 3.3 trips per ,la t or 941 traps �per,� 'day. it ft �:. :ted that - cnly about 5t oU the trips could he at peak hours. )the MOW offlce'would generate b*Uatn 900 and 1060 average daily trips with approximately 5 -10% of the r tripe anticipated dur:ag peak hours. Combtaed, the two projects would ganorate beftean 2,461 an 2,611 average daily trips- -with 73 to 133 entering t C`m oining streets at peak houl,s, 1n eval�oatin the 110pacts for a ArchihOd site �i�dical office locateon? anly,,a residential project of'tan single family units (asstxaing six dwelling units per acre) would generate roughly 100 a.eragd, daily trips. Tit: maJority of theSO trips would ''take place durioig peak; hours. As prt^+iously nip-itionad, the medical opffice building would generate between S0 and 1,060 avaiage daily trips. Approxiottely 5 - "Ot or 45 -105 trips could be expected durng_peak hours. mace: Due to the relatively small size of the "Ts, un soee members of the Coma,ission felt that 50 -65 square feet -of private open space Baas not sufficient, They felt tihnt the project should provide 1,50 square t`eet of private open space far the ground :floor units anal 100 square feet o" private Open space for the second and .toiird ficor units, to ^omparing this submittal with existing facilitiss,'the 50 -65 „square feet proposed is in excess of the private open space provided for .the., two existing senior apartment. projects, The Carmark projergt on i:oami �a Count does not,,provide any private ope P4a0 n end t'ie ` = r Rudol h F1endrickson project on AmeP��YSt 5troet provides ` _ roughly 43 square feet. �, ff PLANNING COF+ L,40H STAFF REPORT r RE: WEST END 8 -nom iSE April 13, 1980 Page ii C. Parkin !hers of the ccWmission expressed Concern a au . e parking provided for the senior apartment Project. The .parking is p used at we space per unit, The Calmar* project is park at 0.72 spaces per unit and the Rudolph,Hendriekson projett is parkwd at one space per unit. Based on site investigations conducted by staff; Wle parking is provided for both projects. D. blaster Plan: At the March -im Mating, the Planning i ss on requested that a master plan be prepared for the Archibald site Undicai office building locations Irdicating how the area Gould -be developed at the present Low- Medfum Residential designation. To date, no plan h been received. 18. ANALYSIS., Wtls staff is scheduled to net with the project proponent's a April 6, 3988. Therefore, additional information may �,, have to be presented orally to the Commission at their meting on April 13, 1988. Iii. EHVIROt NTAL ASSESSMENT: Part i of the EnviromentAt Checklist as been Mitt-e-c-Fb-y-1fie applicant. Staff has crleted part 11 of the Environmental Checklist. -Pon completion of the Initial Study, staff has found no adverse impacts on the enviror nt as a 4 result of the proposed projects, and repotmends the issuance. of a i Negative Declaration. IV. FACTS FOR FtNDIKS: Tn order for the Planning Commission to r.ecooimenti appr��ayTof thi�5e rojc;.ts, thV au ;st find the following: 1. That thg5e projects—are consistent with the land use palicias" of the General Plan, 2. That these projects would be in the best interest of the i health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho 1 Cuctmanga, and 3_ That these projects would not result in any - ,significant. adverse impacts to persons and property in the vicinity -- of the project site. V. CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advertised: in The Dail s —oir newspaper as a public hearing item, Olt' proper yes it i n 300 feet of the project site were sent direct mail public._ i( hearing notices, and the property was posted with a 4 x 8 foot' notification sign per the City "s supplemental noticing requirements (these items have been re- advertisers and re- noticed for the 14arch 23, 1988 public hearing). F r T �� PLANNING COFIMISSIOH STAFF REPOPi R €: WEST ENO A NOURSS: „.. ApriT 13, 1980 a Page 6 = - NMI \1 Yi. REP N."IN: Staff racoame4 t that the Flfirfi i� Cowsst' c+rwa f°ie 'City Council Res_ t�ftions" rerla ending approval the senior boast l�ro3 t (SPA y040 D lk 114S, and W87.42) for the reasons text ih ft Resolutions. ti ff alp recoamends t that the •io'm $$oft provide -• staff with dirccticsn` �tf to the appraprixte cou n 'action regarding tha medical office site (GPASZ -W� WX V-06"'. � Tutus for both approval and denial have t rt influx ,�f th Com9ission's review and con3.deration. with W%6 Onc �rr4Ace, ado0tim . of the applica�� attached wain th, appropriate. Respectfully aEfft eta r _ Brad Boiler city Planafr y Attachments: 8xhihtt "P -March 23, 1988 ' Staff Report Exhibit "8" P Oevelopment Agreement,.87 -02 Exhibit "C'" Development Agreement "87 -02A Resolution of approval for CPA 87 -G4G Resolution of Approval for,DDA 87 -06 9 'Resolutic- �s`� Approval for Oevelvpiment Agreement 67.02 Resolution, F Approval, for Development Agreet 87-Oc Resolution e,t Approval for GPA 87-04H Resolution -bf OertiAl fot GP4 $7 -049 Resolutiol? %'of Approval for BOA 87 -06 Resolution of Denial for iY€itl 87-06 I Resolution of Approval for OR 87 -33 Resolution of Approval for OR 87 -3 I tl '1l r-- M- -°~- -- ��_ CITY OF RANCH( ,O�iCAMONGA 7 l�W DATE: ;arch 23, 1988�y j T Chalmaah and (Members of the Planning Commission *77 FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook,, Associate R,anntr SUBJECT: REV1SE1) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 87.02 -'For a senior housing pro ec on }lie °sou s e o se. mine Road, west of Archibald Avenue. 1. BACKGROUND: On March 1, 198B, staff met with the developers of the senior easing project to discuss th4 terms -of the proposed Development Agreement for the senior housing project. At than meeting, staff and th?.k developer -mutually agreed to certain f' revisions in the Development Agi% - t document. These changes were incorporate into the docutt and sent out forging, However, gt; the lime of the Planning Camission pack *t distribption for the 4inda of Ngrch 23, 1988, this most 'rte;,. ni± Version of the Development Agreement had,not yet been completed. Since that time, the fi+lal v+rsion as reconasnded by staff hAs beeA, completed aWd is now available for the Commissions considoation. Attached is the recommended final version of the Developmuuat Agreement. Please note the changes from the document incl6ded in your agenda packet as follows. 1. The terms of agreement have been changed from a 30 to a 20 year period (see Paragraph 1 «G, gage 2 and Paragraph 6, Page, 4). This change has been made to make th4,.,s Development. Agreement consistent with the Tength of term. as approved for the two exf%tina senior housing Pr 6lJ ct$ i —G. P7E/'7T$ e g eiartiments on Archibald, north of ease Line, and the Rudolph Rendrick$pn Apartments on Amethyst, north of 19th Street: 2. The low income rental requirement has been changed from 103 percent participation to 0 percent of the rental units being reserved for residents of i�A w income ~" (Paragraph 8, Page 5). With the two previlus senior housing projects, the City offered direct financial contributions in terms gf fee reductions and fee waivers. No fee waives or reductions are being proposed as a part of this current project. As a result, the developer has requested, and staff is recommending, that the rental restrictions be applied to only 50 percent of the units as a means to make this project more economically tenable. f •' PlANNItd6 COMMISSIr' STAFF REPORT REYi, t3EVELOPME, AGREEMENT 37 =0 March 23, 1988 Page 3. The time "tenders given to to r9sp6nd to xurious , conditiOn' has b"n increased frog 30 to 60 bays (sue I Paragraphs 27 and 28e PAPIS 'a and ?2).. , 7his ebange has rflUlted from an indication that: loaders would be J unwilling to offer loans for develop"ylt of tbo project r under-11tise tarms. Most lenders twild be urn fling to make ,,:a decision required of ±! QTY OF RANCHO LjTCAM iiQA STAFF lli4DORT FFR March 23, 1988 ;iz Chairean. acid Members of the P7arii,COe+aissi4n� z l 1377 Brad Bulb City Planner � Associate Planner SUBJECT: ESN{VIRRp{�}` NTALVASSESSME€T AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMERT 87 -04G - 1RNJ`r•SL: ie '" reques. to aswAd the rvaneral ail. an se clap role Loan- tiediurl Residential A4-8 dwelling units Pei, acre) to high Residential i24 -30 4wellina units per acre) for 5,.05 acres of land, located on tW south side of Bass Line Road, west of Archibald Av4VFue -'APR: 208- 031 -10, 19. (� I ENdIROi 4E9-TAL - ASSESSMENT AND DLIE'EL Pl T QISiRICT AMENDMENT- 8 05 - - request `o : amend the Rev Erc 74 r c p rom Lcv-Mdium (4-8 d0lliing unit.., per c;re) to Nigh Residential (24 -30 dwelling units, per acre? attached,�ith the Senior Housin� Overlay District (SdDJ) to the tiaso distvict for $'.05 acres of land, located on the south side of 8 s Line K Road,, wst of Archibald Avenue . 208- 1333 -18, 16. XiELOPM €NT AGREEMENT WI -02 NOURSE DEYELOPMEN12.` - At eve o?"- It'? Agreement, between e y np a amonga and Nourse Development for the purpose of prokiding a Senior dousilig Pro3ect',par eie requirements of the Senior - dousing Overlay District iSKtion 17.20.040-"e the Development Coda, Ordinance 211) R r 170 apart* --.t units, to be located on the'touth side of- Ddst-Line Road, wev^ Archibald Avenue - APM: 208 - 031.23, 19. €t3VIRONNENTAL ASS €SSMERT AND GENERAL PLAN AREtt MENT 8744H request to amen the Lan se F-lement of e W-e—ral Plan from Low-MedfdW Resi xtiai (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to fic \for 1,89 acres of land, located on the west side of ArchOald Alvenue, south Of Base Line Road - AM 208- 031 -17, 54".9,:56 and 57. €NVIROt Mil'AL ASSESSMENT' AND D£TELOPMENT 01,M. ICF AMWKE 87- A requesIF to aMn'd a Deve opmea s r e s p 'ir-€MS Low - Medium d Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre).: to Office Professional. for 1.69 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south: of Base Line Road - APR. 208- 031 -17, 54, 55, 56 and 614 RELATED FIL €S: DEVELOPMENT R €YIi� 87 -33 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -34 , PLANNING COMMISS1 ^4 STAFF REPORT NEST END INVEST - -'S /Nt1tIRSE UVELOFME T March 23,, 4985 Page Ab,;5tR T• The applicants are 'proposirJ,a to develop the property a y to the West ana, to the Smith of the eq Ain - Robbins center locatad at tNe southwest corntea of Base i i �!e Road and A'chibald Avenue- with a senior housing apartment project and Aliacent aedical offiwe ,facility. The processing of ;th9s project I required Late s Wittal of seuen different appllGations. which are listed as follows I. A ameral Plain': Amendment to rW,. ;Jgnate the -senior housing site ; from Low- Wecdiurt Lea Nigh Density Re sidential, (Gph 87_M), 2. A DevelO nt 41sfrict "dmertt to reclassify the senior housing 'site frorst tOw•WOun to High Dernl,i Residentiax= :xxith a SF ove►qay, iDOA 8,,_M, 3. A Devol nt� Ji nt berms the City, cT1 :thy ser0or Deve.rog prOj�i' de4 <4oper as requirt,11 by the Develo t Grfiuts (DA J"2), 4. Development pr,�Jew 87 -33, the ditvelapatertt plans for, the senior housing Oroject site, S. Ai Unaral P "anf Amendment _ to aodeslrnate the medical office site'fron Low- eledium to Office, (GPA 87•04H), 6. A Development Dlztrict -0(kent. to ��classrfy the ,radfcal office site io - Medium Residential to Office /Professional %(DDA 87 -06), avid 7. Developmnt Review, ?87= 3fi;'`the development plans for the - medical pftiice fay liiy site. The Plannitag /, isston initially reviewed tht -r-,-nerai Plan and Develo nt t?.strict JMeendmc_�nts Orr &pt er 23. .1.987. At that time, the p7Aming Commission in &44Vt d that they wanted to rev all eleae,�r�s of i;ErL to?cal pr�3ect including the Development Age nt,md 'Development Reviews at a sing-�Te time. Therefore, the Comissi , has issued a number of COntinuffi'0 ` for "-ice amendments pending, sc Development Agreement and the �Devologment Reviews be4ng . ready is schicdule for r Wn- issicn review. At the previous public hearing* t; q- Manning Ctmftsion indisr ed Support for the senior hour4s ^g project, b ►Wt expressed 1414e 1 reservations with designating the Archibald site for = off ic04'` I, J develOp;,x.nt, The Development Agreement betwten the City and tilt senior housing project devejo jr has bean � � s �, is for a 20 ..e4r -� s preitaoed. =Thi � Agr��s� -�t _rind, restricts tenancy individuals defined as for jgenOa;y, people who Are fifths -fie (a,) years of age or plderY, desi"ates 59 percent of the rental units to be ' y r�� 1 r PLiw`;NING COMMISS --4 STA' P R,EKk WEST EW INVESTK. ,S /NOURSE DEVELOPMENT March 23, 5988 f Page 3 reserved for' houseWrW "VtMse - income _ qualifies at the "low tc moderaW income lev,227,, as defireG by the Development Code,. and t _ rerkttzk�' rates on these d:•signated units -are to be controlled at I level' determine3 as P,fforftble based on tents not to exceed 3L r pem4n of t4 Y .t tan income for Sao 8erl,a► i un*yt. the Develop went ojl!j�j- are U'Auded, as part of ' hio :flverall apP11c&tfnn package but these sWri1i6 proposals haft b *;¢n reviq d r and &6,tlyzed by staff under .segar..ti:e cover. Based on the suppa*t for j senior housing Predect indicated b the Planning Cosarission at` Sept�viser 23, T == eeetinq' staff has prepared PesoQtio9s recur ndiny`tb the City Council:approvat of SPA 8i -046, DD11 87 -03, ark �OA 87 -02. ��1 the other he, d, witic the 'Comisr ft,n "!�- expressel concern and lack, of consensus ��eg�trding the medical office sitzv" staff �jaR, �" bmitted P.4;:Cyutions recomeendIng both denial and - approved f* ;P- 87-01H and D 87- cab{ The Commission should consi� � rI I mater "11al ., and 4M regarding the area +.eel offtao site ��o thon nrne3a staff with direction as to the approprUte course�pf zi, n4 ` tf it i� th%n Commission's decisir: to' ;�.coaWanai apprcval �f ,;the office profesz1goal site, staff ' ho'atd be directed tq te}E3eRleiiCeer`?it stipatuttny that the seita,,,prR, of can °not' developed unless the office professiop4l prom -;f$ Archibald Avenue, is developed prior to or,concdrrent kth'3v* senior project. However, should the Orvo ?ssp rt District 'Awndeent for Office Professional designation be denied, the Development - recaenr should,' be, to stipulate that the senior proj.:x can not be developed q- nless . all required access any. ", itrainage easements for, the Senior tO�jact aye obtained. II. BACKGROUND. The original pn'oject aooi#eant was T.4C Ouvetopnrent. Prior o e January 13, t. }�01 is hearing, TAC -informed the ft that Mf-,W were transferring alai rights and interests in the project to Weolt ' .rid Investments. West End Investments has just recently informed the Ci ,;r that they are now tr,ansferr1r their ri ht °; and interest irr the Senior housing p^wlion aid the application BtGP 817 04G, DDiA 87 -05, DA 87 -02) to Hourse Development. Mest End will: remain as the project applicant fW tl P.40 a<I „office Site (GPA 87 -04H, ODA 87 -08). Though there are OW �tAt!"separate project aPPlicants, t+hV have informed the Citi that `-they would still prefect these it" to be cansidery-:; ifr conjunction with each otWtr, as a single comprehensive total. 44Velopientpackage. III. AUALYSiS :S A. Senior Housing Proi,t. I. "C�neral.. I n Amendment The - General Plan Amendment is �- to re es`� na ee'senior housing site (the_5.05 acres located on the south side of Base Line; Road, adjacent to the Est of the Bask n- Robbins center) from its tj t ALANRi OMM:SS' 5TAFF REPORT S /WYJRg, DFYEI.OPI�E {T �,, tiES7 E1 Ih 5llh ?. ,. Mar& 23, 'gas page 4 designati _ of 1,o• .Math Residentia? ' C44r`� .�iqh Residential t2nt Alan , adft unite 3� rna, seneral dwelt Gng units per acre . q,4 9R the siha = with Pw+Qr th�i� is ir, confrraiarO the Peneral Al�i6� it statee itt�n'civ�s, i.e. c; it, E <arm't.a€ { qi provide crctsin deveup.�� at ieast 25 �l s1aa� a.� !pjeCt ifl ara, sad r!esi ,.► ►iic heaRing perC�:tt`�or the unto, are` aysila'i+. >�rd r At the P : e.' i to"..ian indicated %usehoai7 . (' inrda , art ..�fng 23, , tw approve t;1J?� site for senior �\ a Cruse s ss supiw r, hods is..ta f "'iris re�asi< 2. bevel , +nt District + _ of the sine from its .°.�"" use zone i�6- -g Residential rep: afft a aijon of 1,,r,+,,MMadi �idential (20-30 cu-.rot des ecr31, to '' 13o rsi rl�ut Per dreiling units ran r acre) %ith a urs that thr1 drAiti .,units if 'yhe Omission �onc r rule, . = Stit1•Cneral �yneent #s aP op 'frog Otr. plan above -�tio , of the Develop" � District "Hig11. Residential would „ten the Reside tial` to i.o�r- 1�ad3;se to ►eafntain',tme.�conois�er�Sta esSary rsd y t also than be nes as is re li 'co,ener Foverla�Y -Additio,�is zoning i "S1i Law. w4lso' 'arid, use classifica1ony housing tO the fcr a senior added dye site bairig zoning WS xanaa preclude' the site and a senior ecessary prof t only:% �j , othr than developed with nY ,,,, D of .ham site � � Met K, '� Project. The Project preconditions required bytes that n�ust n= "r rRsee ab, Prere+Qu housing Develap+rt bode for the site tv "hu considered foodon 17.20 for copy project flea dttachatnts OY reeeent :J nt t <ent - Th e Deve.opree ro3ect the senior housing P the by and e e Y as required developer,_ has beer, Iii PDeveio "It Agreeftn� isthc nt Code. betwo, µ.the City contract i, letntation contractual agree�aen has �s its u d and do ies fc -'. developer that s aia of the required development A copy of the 'DeVeio *n» for the a senior housing praect. nc7udTheed' bnasjce d ��,chx�ents Arreexenit has been pints of the � � Coa its si on' _ nt are suwarari zed aS JO l Ows' Oeve'lopeaentenie . R1 i n: 1 Ak a. The dweVeleper will Xrovide 170 apartment. units far fiarget tenants , i.e. senior citizens who are 65 years of age or older, with certain excoptions ++'s contained within the Agreeant. b. Fifty pars vnt (60S) of the units -011 be �kargeted t r residents who "at the eif+i inewwa qualifications, i.e. tneir inco S do not exceed 60 percent of the median income for ,persons or couples within the County of San .Bernardino as._currently defined by the Fejerul Departaaant of fesusing'Urban DwelopwIt, C. gents on these target ursits will be restricted where the rents charged to residents will not x mreed i 30 "rcent of. this 8o percent I cue L d. The term of this ag twill be for a •.fir } period. After the opaaentre�ent expires, the property is no or bound If the, intent is to use the properiv for anything other than senior housing, a Development District Amendment would `first have 4,* be applied for as the inclusion, of "SHAD" in the zoning of the property5 restricts permitted u;es to that for senior housing only.,•, At the mutual consent of both the Ity and tho,; property ogler, the terms of the Development Agreement tarn be extended lh"ond t�fs 20 deer perio�+.l , In e:4hange for the developer providing this afford#ble housing for the targeted senior group, the City' agreed to provide the following development incentivest A. In orcer:,to maximize the net yield perK -acre, the City will permit an increased project density with a c0mbinatipn of Granting a change in the densf44 range (tire General Parr a -x Povelopment Distract Amendments), and a klensity bogus t allow a net yield Of $5.05 units to the acre resulting in a 16 percent densi ,V increase above the amnded General Plan designation, and a 338 perctA density increase ab-)Ve the current General Plan designation. aft I i PLANNING COMMIS�7`4 STAFF REPORT WEST END INY£S11►: : S /W)URSE DEVELOPMENT FArch 23, 1988 Page 6 i). A reduatic1 in the required on.§ite parking stondatrd will be granted tQ a ratio of Y non- covetti'd ,parking space per unit. No fee waivers or reductions or any other type of` j direct financial -:ontributton by the City in being proposed as a pars of thft D tvelopment Agreet`ant. a, Bevel tnt _pAvter Included as part of the total eve aop en ',,pac citge is the DevelopmeLt Review for the site develojmeFRt of the senfor hagsfnq srk!t (OR 87,j, 33). The approved Deval t Reviews wfill he incorporated by rrefemocae as an ex ibis, as part of the n= vslc�ttt Agreawt to tr*qufre ichst the site be developed to those spp, —+vsd ste'Adgpds 4he issue of CPO" space with site develop .1t of the seni:,r per tkt has been anlyaed by staff��as part of the Development Review staff report. The tOl mptt# revolAlon of this issue should= then bo incorporated intO the approiid development plans and /or C06 itiOns of approval. This element will theft aytaatt1�, .'ae cart of Cite Development Agreaawe as arts used DR 0-33 will be Incorporated by-- refemtt into the Development Agreement. 6. Red ical OffyceRe Site: 1. General Plan a r; Amendment Tee General Plan Amendment g a oposed aedical office site ( thie s 1.59 aces located on the w =)st side of Archibald adjacent to the. South of the aaskin- Robbins centerl from Low- Madium Residential �de8 Willing units per acre) to Office for a planned U400 square foot MQdical office facility., The F , caing CottagisSinn iiritially reviewed this ;�xquest at 'the September 23, 1987 public hearing, 111ough no Consensus was keached, the Planning Commission, at that time, expressed concern with designating additional offics use at the Archibald /Base Line interoection. The cooLl -*rns were that there was already sufficient aa�teeria3 and office s$e at this intersection and more Baas not needed, am that by increasing, intensity €�f 1and use At this site with the r�Asignati`cn from tRci¢e'htial to Office would,- :result in undesirable traffic • "pacts to the street cir6ulatiw system. In considera�Eion of the expressed traffic concerns, staff has consulted with Triffic Engineering in regards to Clis iasue. in r" r'cot*aring the 1.69 acre parcO developed with the proposed 22,400 square feet of medical cal office Stith residtntia aw011ing units that could be expected itner PUNNING COMMISS*" Miff REPORT WEST Eta INVEML. 4/NOPIRSE DE'VELOMENT Ma,vc 23, 1988 Paoli 7 present General Plan/Development District Classification, 90 ADT's would ba genaratft with the resfdertiatl use versus bwomn 400 aold 1,Gw` with the medical otrice develt'doMt. While the kedical office facilit' would Merate significantly more traffic; it f 1s txpectad that ", this traffic would be. distributed i throughout the course of the day and not �:onctjntrated at peak hours. 1herefort, it is not tree, Ad tw`tat the medical office facility would result it trafFiS: iVacts, i than would significantly altar or cimango ttte 'Tiew of traffic along Archibald Avenue. Sines no clear direction -was indicated by the Manning Cowaission at the first public hearing, staff ,hts prepared Resolutions recomending , both = danial and approval for the General Plan , RttAcent. The Commission should consida l material and •input, and then provide staff with d icin as tc,` the appropriate course of action. if thev,P anninngg'CommissjeNt concurs vr7th staff's fininga, tt:e� acptian of thttacJhad Resolution would be the a��ropriate course of action, if it it, the �,is?iat,(- s decision to recm*nd approval of the, ,:; Adical 'office sine, staff wn+ald recon w, d to ,Life Com; dssian to direct „ thgt the �! Devalopment Agreement be amended to include provisions rAstrikWng developmen: of the medical office site to 4pprO*W puns nnly end phase development such that the m medical office facility y only be constructed concurrent with or subsea cent to, but not prior tz, the tensor housing project, P. POLVOOPment Districts Amendment - This request is to rec ass fy°'ffie" an use son ny of the tite from its � current designation of Low- ldedion 'Residerstial (il=$ 4',; dwelling units per act*) to OfficelProfessief "al 4, -to 'V peratit development of the medical office facility. As with the above:- taentioned General Plan Amenda*nt, %taff jl has al$o prepared- two Resolutions for the Deveiopmert District Amendmeyt. one recoaaaending ,genial and one recow- ending approval. Whatever is the Comnissiots's direction regarding the faneral Plan rmendinn', should be the similar direction for the DDA to mAllit"ain Vie required consistency. `between the General -.Plan an6�= zoning.. Develo nt Review included as part of the total oeve oilmen packa a Is the Development Review for the, site develop "nt of the medical office facility (DR 8i.. 34). The Oelitlopment Review has been revie�,, and analyzed by stt,11f under separate cover. PGANIXIE ' rIS� "i STAFF" REPORT WEST EW VESTt� : (SAOURSE DEi "EtOPf t / l� March 23, ,2968 page 8 17. UVIRO�AI, AMS&ww.* Part I, of the En` irOtataF as .. n su c., y e spplicant. Stuff has completed Part :I of the Environmental Checklist-k ; "pto, r on of that Initial Stut(y, staff has found CO adverse te�act the environment Ls a, rtsuit of the proposed prosects! _.aT4 re i4s the issuance e'egative Declaration.' V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for tot Planning Fiss��. recom+se APPrOvAl Of these aro, .its, they elk it find the 1. That these protects are" coosist461t mill . a0 lain�� policies of the 8eneral plan, hose t projects wb,.id' be 2: p i 'l e "I t of i - fety, and Walfara of th cfi i tee oil 11 �Rcho C.QC&Wnga, and I 3. That these *jj cts would not result in a sigj ;cis nt adverse iWzcts t� persons an4,pr�er�y in tf.e vicinity of the project site. l AIRML ,J YI. CORRFSPONDENCE: These iteas have been -Advertised ;gin The flail 1 elIevo'r.._:ne►aspa°p4r as a, public he ;ring iteva, all prR�rerty owners wTf5Tn 300 feet of'the, project site were sent direct;, *ail puhli hearing notim, and` the property was postad with-* 4 x 8 foot notification sign per te:e City's $^Ipplmntal noticing 1,equirt nts & these 'revs have been re- advertised and re- naticed fat- the March 23, 1988 vublic hearing). VII. atC"ENDATTON: staff y*:oWnds that the planning ;omission i Torwara zo We City Council Resolutions recomaendingi a0provel of. the senior :housing project (GPA 87 -04G, DDA 87 -05,` and OA 87 -02)l __, for the reasons stated in the Resolutions. -Staff also reco0wnds that the Comissfon provide staff wit4 41rection- as' to the appropriate course f action regarding the radical office tits (GP'A 87 -048, ODA 87 -06). Resolutions for both approval and denial have been included for the Comission's review. and consideratlaq.° With Commission concurrence, adoption OP the applicable attached Resolutions would then be e, propriata. r� �, ` Ar i 44 PLANNING GOMTSS" rr STAFF AVORt WEST END :tEiiES�i4.. r S/1"ASE EYELOPMEN sL ;.Page Larch 23, 1988 . s erti., •+ bit anner 6�,8Co ter_ -Atchmnts: Exhibit "R'`; 'vicinity Kap E41bit , "8* - Existing Denera7 alatn(2Dning Exhibit a Ap Existing fang; 0341- Sanior dousing .. ExUbit :• Existing Land USe , ,aeiica3 Office Exhibit "B" - proposed Sim pipe Section 17.20.040 of the 06!?+.t :nt' Got J Planning Cowdssion Miou%es ai' Sep'te bor 23, "0,51 PTxnRi C fission Staff RayPart a SOPtehar 23, 1987 for Sehfor. wusing Planning tssion Staff Report i'if Septaser 23, 1987 for 14adictl Offito Resolution of Appm�q z GPA 87- Rex4iutton, of App t�sy -jjl `* bDA 2.7'.0rfi Resoluion of !RPrl DA 87 -CE With Attached V Derelo fern Agreement Resolution of App. -Ovel - 8PA 87 -040 Resolution of t#nial - GpA 87�(gfl Resolution of Approval - DoA 87, [ Resolution of N"ial - BOA 87 iG6 c _ i rnmiwftlWn:4�i`'- u•rrt.�`'�trr .�.�_.,_ —. __ . , Lrt* +,�rl ��` * ° ��` �'r f •f •e•A•4� 4 f °•.�;) °!tom °tt ' °'i,• °•t•t •s•eef•tr 6• - ••••t feif•r• ••••t 4Gk•At •fi•�f ,Asia °.� a•f•H••Tel °� ta4ae•etas• •i•- i••sw �;1�OOdM •s•TC• . • e 4 • A• i r�e�dd @�s� d d Q d • s a 4 4 s sir a °. �- re¢ ia`•a ti •:4 V• �•�•'. i:°° ask.' ARCHISALD Genera a 6 • • M ♦ • t • e Y • 4 • • W° MINE oT�+•4erse•• •w•ft•trt r.►, k• -a • °Y ° °t °` °• °'- 4at �e4, to a,.a iay 4•i sus °•Pe °• °.4 •e••a•• .. .: .. • °o° °e''sessseP• •e••art••.•asY •.•. • • a- e i it ••eak naTalse.ac ata °i. fr••ik °.•r•+ 1•a •4 a•afkt 0♦ e >;e►iososasrt a�2�• •tRa *v' a•T�eaae•a•ep: •ss•.r� s. r ♦ a••TSaes.asa•a ��ysloprr��eR ®1'Eekttc, i SAsE CITY OF aTEM;t � �" �.• RAN I Ci' 1I } ,'GA T►TL9,ti EXHIBIT-. SCALE. _ � ��'�; �7;` -r ��— ►� ( �.s �..t lay. •� �4 # "�'a SeCtion 17.20A40 `� J ♦ Tararalt PaaaulatitYra E1. The primary ra�sident popUhttioeogroup that is Intended to be served by the "alts co +�etructed. through use of inur:atives offered Fs part of the Senior iiuusirsg Overiay `District are senior CitLzena who meet ft following criteria: (a) For ttn�ata,, residents, 9� acecapapi=� who era, maa:,j to each other, k either spouse shalt be fifty -five t55) years of age or der. t (b) For indi:✓iduals who M, ea, each Inelviduel shall be fafi� r ve`' . . (65) years of age or 01C--- \\ (c) In addition to the xLro restrictions Gust forth in subparagraphs and b above, any individual or marcled couple who wLwh toQcdupy or residga in the Project shaait have mid maintain an annual income frown sill soure" equal to. or leas: than eighty parMt (80%) of than M" &R, \` ineoml for persons or couples aeithin than County Of San Bernardino as currently defined by the Federal Departmsnt of lYtataaitag sad Xrtaas ' Development. i D. Applicabil,112 7b* Senior Housing Overla y Distrat �aaquiree the Presence of ceri&ita conditions before it can be applied for er attached to a speeifte p+trael� of lend. In order to adequata'sy sand satisfactorfly ire the target populatiain theft this district has been axeateai to serves, any proposed. project .site must demonstrats the following condittoes and teruress I. Appropriate base district zoning. 2. Land asses in the immediate and surrounding areal, current and Projected, must be compatible with the living anviroi[marpt requiccd by se nior citizens quit must be free of health,' safety, or quite). nits praablems {i.e., area genegenerally ; 3. Area infrastructure must be in place or -- Onatruotod as pant of the project and capable of serving the Propoeeq p ?cject including; (psi streets W sidewalks (c) traffic/pedestrian signals 4. ProPo6ed site t op®grapi:y .must be Fairly level and (,$iiy tranve:rsa±d by Persons of limited mobility. 5. Prcyposed site must demonstrate proximity to o" nmmercial establishmeasts, service providers, and other amenities including: (a) food shopping (b) drug stores (a:) banks (d) medical and' dental facilities AM (e) public transit (main or frtouently served rout(M) W open spa ce /recreationaal facilities C, " �; E, pep Niki Bratt, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Coaatissioner Tolatay questioned the disposition of the aaeall triangular Piece next to bhe frfQwAY- Ns fel, }this could be a good "sign dement of the project. Scott Murphy, /)Lsuciate Planner, responded to the question stating thi& Is flood control. now and Itnve not tvteive3 a response from the district stating the disposition. Chairman *Niel opened the public heart". Mr. Cra,ig Page, 0*ft eserting Vinson. DeOlop ont, 2361 El Torro Road, El Torro, stated theft %'o was. o, corrsttion of the staff report. Clarified 090 are proposing the minimum lot size as 7206 square and not 76M square feet as stat —A in the staff report. They are stth"ist in agreement with Etta staff report avA- camnot respond is teem of the dispositior)of t1W triangular piece. Chairman Acmiel closed the public hearing.— Comeissicner Tolstoy saved to ,�ppro %a. the General plan m- andment , Commissioner @'fakir' secataied Uc Notion. motion Carried hy`t, following votes e��......,...,F 6W64aVT, MAAMtt, QUTiEA, EWRiCK, NCNYEG AU F j NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - ="- -- Cy�ried r Commissioner Chitiea goved to approve the pevelo nt �; District District Amends nt, Commissioner Tol$toy S,eao rd the emotion. Iopwi _d; by the following vow: AYES: COMMISSIONERRS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOV, "4SLE'Y, EMERICK, 14CNIEL NOES: COHNISSIONERS: NONE i ASSENT: CONNISSIONERS: NONE -- carried I. ENYIROWENTAL ASgSSME -TAM+ NERAL PUJI AMtii44ENT 87-040 TAC� OPMEE--w e6qut$ 4 amen nerad an`C&W -tl-e e R�+�'u� Residential (d-S dwelling units per acre) to High n 14 Intial )24 -30 dwelling units per acre) for S.O'S acres of lanctR 1(.- . c�ated on the South side,. of Sass Lino Road, west Of Archibald - APN 208- 031 -18$ 19. Planning h +`i. . Comsission ' itt5 3 "� Se�lteier 2. ik % ENVIR'OWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AKENDl NT 87 -05 - 11e reques a"na UK — Dev e opnen Ifistr si ts'p 1•rA\% Residential (44 dwel lin units per scm') ':o High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre attached with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) W the bate district for 5.05 Wres of la,' located " the south side of Dase LiRa Road, west of Archibald Avenue - AP9 2O&071.18r 19. J. ENVIa. NTAL ASSESSMENT Aids GENERAL PLAN AVE W 87 -04H TAC iiEO 7- 7—AriQua'�T "*n3te"C'a., se E anon of'tFie en:ra ' awn" r�"oss Zow-FitdiUM Resi.iantial 14-8 4wellinco units per acre) to 3ffirs f0r,,1.69 1cres of lawl, located on the vnest side of Archibald Avetlue, SODU Of Use Line Raod -- AN 209431 -1% 64, 56, 56 and 67. EWIROLNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DVSTRI�,T A!lEMMkT s7.os fats. A req"sr, ro..amene tnk v Wwn s Ict map roe _ov- 'tie"3iuoi` �esieential (4-8 daellina unfts, # ,-r acre) to Office Professional for 1.69 acres ,of 'land, located s�,., tfde west side of Archibald A"nue, NOUth of Base Line Roat App 2U"31-17, 6+i� 56, 56, and 57.x, Otto Krgu il, Deputy City ,P3anner;, presented the combined staff reports. Chairman MCKU1 oW04, the public hearing. uw U-aat.sw, Pitassi-Q&I ostu Architects, 9190 Haven X-tlua Rancho Cuc�nonga, stated they feel ths%y have set with staff reccmmi%ndatians and would like Commission's ctfttntje to complete the process. Mr. Henan Resqpel, 9505 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucav- nga, statad die did have a problem with the anior busing but d^as have a profiles pith the office coa�plex adjacent tq the SEiiar'uject if they of , i.ng to have a shared access. This will Cre;: s- iaffic problems. He" ,ry "' �'sta °fed his concerns with the 'ffic, CONViex being Or. Archibald. Mrs Dave Peters, W'< Archibald, Rancho Cupamonga, stated` his prop��rt '' i:' next U-1 thi P114j ect and his primary e;.ncern is what type of water flow and flood control provisions tre het «g pursued. Mr. Tin liismack, Civil Eengiatar for the project, verified that the drainage does exit Out onto Archibald Avewe- The prVerty gently JJJ drains over toward Archibald and they 4"t anticipate any big difference in grade between their site and Mr, Peters' prope��y. There could be a two foot difference in grade to acco►wOdate dris�ewayt. }k Mr. Pete Pitassi, Pitassi'- Dalmau Architects, 9190 Haven - Avenue, �anca Cucamonga, stated regarding the grading th`Iy anticipated lowerin,,the _. northern U- shaped building lower than Baseline ari then the rardll-t portion of the project. is 2 1 /,Z fret lawxr than that, and then t1;e southern 1l- shaped building an xdd�jipi>:al 2 1/2 fret lower than that. Planning Commission Minutes �- 2 ��} -$- September 23, 1987 ti r �-• �� J Miitr grading inalyift 'at7tilytis indicates there would approximately tymo fame of fill that would slope down the property line and thCdrainage would be handled with tither a Swale or a retaining wail in add4tio» to a garden wall that would separate the project from the property to the ' South. The intended use is a aedical office budding, 25,&4 square ' feet, and it is integral to the project au -a whole and compli4 4nts each other.. Traffic could puli into the property off Baseline 4fid exit onto' Archibald an.�i it is the intent to link the project not only -lifth pedestrian Ucsss but also with vehicular access. There will be a substantial grade point at the point too. Chairman Mcmiel closed the public hearing. CoMissioner Chitiea saw that the Altifor project is an appropriate one and the idea of having low rents aW14, le wou14 be appropriate. A medical facility adjacent is appropriate fso. both projects is important to discuss.; circulation throufh c0aaents, she questioned it Responding to Mr. Rempel s -- Coeraission c looking for or actually jj ":i 7 traffic through and whit would be the ra p.qreussions of doing so. I would like to sate ire specific inform"14n ra,..rk0ft9 the water flow down Archibald a� his location. Mr t:'4rs does have a legitimate concern as this would be a substantial am -^-f land draining o►rto his pr rty. Conceptually, she likes the idea- of ;)linking the two projects in sotae scanner. A senior project in this Trtatien Might be appropriate: Commissioner TotstO stated the water silt y A'lil�-'o» would have to be taken care of whet" they bring in the site plan for Design Review and thinks the senior project is a good one there. Ti* surrounding retail center, are there to serve people who are not able to drive and feels this is a Plod use for this piece of property. fie is 'concerned with the General Plan Amendiant which changes residential yw Sty try, office designation. _. C1i0'im7aan McNiel stated there are going to be mRaNy score applications for senior projects. AS20ciated with most senior projects, there will not 'Oe space for medical office and frow. his point- of -vtew, yomasissi0n should take a good look at what is being( prop&.te4,. Chairman MOM opened the public hearing, , Mr. Terry A. Ch-j'tensen, TAC Develo,=ent, stated that there is interest by a.rel) doctors to move inXo the iae:�.ical office complex. fie fe► t ; tht senior# would d0 better entering an,+ .exiting on 9aseli�e where the traffic is less. Mr. Herman Rempel, former Planning Cowissiont: , eta`eed there is a Head for SON type of facility for people who need medical care. driveway already back ups and s0 does the driveway on Archibald so that,: a left turn in to the project mould be -a problem,, A tonvales is a'good use to tie in with the senior housing project. cent bocce Ms. Wilma Brenner, speaking on behalf ��eni�a eitizet�s, stated a 1 convalescent home in this location wok t be appropriate. She I Planning Gtmaission 3 CF SeJUT�er, Z3,, 1947 KI O c. 4rented that a medical o"ict xomplox edUcent is appropriate to the 'senior housing project. Sumer Citizens like something Nose they can walk ta, and be close. Bore and more seniors are moving out this diraction from Los Angelft and Otynge County since there art some More freedoms- In this area. shf'- .�ttiy would be)�great to have adjacent to the senior housing proJiK . i� COMissio'her Chitiea stated she would like to see this project continue and thu possibility `if working out sass of the issues addressed in discussion. COMIssioner Blakeesley statedr.iIs concerns with the intq�, ,ity of uses in this area, all of the commerc.al and the traffic. This ooject a+iti tee traffic Arobta�es, ingress and egress, no Matte, what direwtion ft fa0s. The best use for this parcel, from -A. l"i ese point -of -view, wrid be residential. Commissioner Toistoy stated he could not support IteM: 3' since there is Just too much office. Commissioner I*rick questioned how Many seniors could pport rradiCat faciliir caeplex and tiPeis particular intersection ready has extremely heavy traffic congestion.. He fs*ls office generates nor, traffic congestion. airman NCNiei opened the public hearing. Camissianer Chides moved tcl continue I to the October 28, I9S meeting, Commissioner 8lakesltW seconded th* motion. Notion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, ,KESLEY, ENERICK,. NCNUq., TOLSTOY HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: W)NE -- carried Commissioner Chit%Z moved to continue Item J to the Octflper 29, 1987 meeting. Chairman Nckiet seconded the motion.- Nb�ia:t carrb by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS CHITIEA, MCNIEII, BLAKESLEY, iOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICY- ABSENT!, COMMISSIONERS :" NONE Commissioner Emerick clarified his no text. �te for she reasons stated in � � I�'�/`�'�T• -,� --carried � t�lanning 4ommission M� tee - ` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF-RE-PORT DATE: September 03, 3987 v , a wn i TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commisean PROM: Brad Butner, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt Assistant Planner SUBJECT: EMVIitONMEpITAE, ASS €SSENT ANC 6E9001t PLAII AMENDiEF[T 87 »040 °Ta'�- ifEisECO - rsequ o .t,term`Ti�ia ' ones n an se p roe Low" - Jut Residential, dwelling units per acre) to Hid 'Residential dxeiling units per acre) for 5.05 acres of It1ld located on thrW south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald APN: 2Q 031 -18, 19, DM IWX DISTRICT WNW- ' 27 ri DEVELOPMEmYT COR radp:as r e ve opemm NP s w c s 'Taw- Medlium Residentief (4..8 dwelling units per acre) to High Residential x24.30 dwelling units per acre) attached with the Senior fkrusing Overlay District (SHOD) to the base district for 5.05 acres of land located on the south s",, .'of Base line Road, welt of Archibald Avenue - APN: 20�.-- 331 -18, 19. ABSTRACT: The applicai�r't has submitted a development proposal under e n•or Housing Overlay District (SHOD) of the Development Code. The submittal package includes A r!y, -est for. a Development Agreement, for a General Plad Amendeen"4 :for a Development District Amendment, and an #Pplication for pmly, ,,t approval of a 170 unit senior housing project on 5.5 gross acres of land and approval of a related project, of an adjacent 8.150 square foot medical office building on 1.69 gross acres of lane. Because the General Plan land use change from Lott-Medium Density to High Density depends on the "t of the site for Senior Housing, approval of the Development Agreement must be concurrent with approval fov, the General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendments. At this time the Development Agreement has not ben finalized. Iklso, the project design and site plan are being reviewed. It is anticipated that the Development Agreement and project review will be completed by October 28, 1987. Therefore; the Planning Com�missicn is requested to hold`s public hearing for preliminary review and comment on the entire pe,,kige and to continue the public hearing to October 28,- 198'7 for i inal recommendation to the City Council. I. ,< t •eIl PLANNING COWISSi STAFF WORT GPA 87-04G & ODA 8f -05 - 1'AC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION September 23, !987 Page 2 II. BACKGOW: Tito applicant is ri4uesting a General Plan Amondp a _A veiy�nt, District hban*nt and approval of separ' app7ications-for the senior a"Moan pra3ect and an'gfficet teaadi, Project. The`:Yplicant is Fr is to bvr�ld afforziab7e hoes' under the Seajor NQUSing Overlay Distict (SiiOD). ,Thertforg,on, the tame: of tde SHM the applicant 71 enter i::to a Dtveiopae Agreaiant wifii� the City. The progact proposed is for I)O unite 5.5 grans acts of land. M. PROJECT AND SM DES'CRIPTION (Etthibi "A• Ord "C ") Appiicatil' or an man o r, an'rs' p o tplan and to 1 � Developaent District` Map hake bean made in �Juwtion with proposal for devalopent of a senior citizen projeet on the sub;11, site and relCmd radical offices on an adjacent sits to the •ast,; A. Action Requested: The applicant reques6 approval applicazions rm aewnd the Land Use Map of , e General Plan a� the Developetent Districts oaap frog `L04. adiurt Dens,' Residential to high Density Residential. O. Location Base Lint Road west of Archibald Avenge C. Parcel Size: 5.5 acres D. iurroundin. Land Use and Zoning: fto,rzn - Nei qhDo"16-04TO-mi-e—rcTal SO%�fh Vacant; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units oer acre) East - Neighboncced C rcial West - Single Wily, Resi0ntial; Low Density Residential (2.4 dwelling units Der acre) E. General Plan Des_ bQnetic�� (Exhibit W )- ro act bite esir art .a C�FB duelling unit; per a cre) North - Neighborhood C mercial South - Low Density Residential (2- 4.d►rsl ling u-�!,ts per ace East - neighborhood Camrcial and Low Density Residdentia7 Hest - (27-4 ow DeensitynResidential (2-4 dwelling units per ace;, , C' F. Site Characteristics 'tile site, co"'SiStjng of two orct l 6 s cues grs ua y o southeast. OR pne parcel there is J� older singe fa ita+ sfeence which has no historical, i cultural signific&rte and several smaller, storage "structure! The other parcel is Y4cant with a concentr;-,tion of "tre, adjacent to Base Line Road. i c' .provide affordable mousing for san!�Jr r�r � frz in In ar" which has a character unipuf;; to tht "04 Of serilar ditixefrs, ii *iudirrg: c apprtrpriate bass district 20.11"9 'J tocatio," in an arm which is r+kl t from health, safety* or t�ois+O",pro lwl�: �.�t and fr�s. c ,art# infrastructure in pacsbc4u�f #'r8 stt��4ts� 5i+fa xr s and tr Ffie st ais7 7!! i o site topow AMY whity� is fditly Bevel." located near t4 ctourcijil _ �!Stibli:heeerrts, service ` Provide"- and other Location: -1be proposed location on near rt a Avenue rgeetx the above e e Lire, Road ices including foots ShOPping :, drug stores, {�i^ ank s � republic banbcs and public ,. c &re'xedic if exist asiaa�nt to the site. An emergency ° \: c re' dial fae,iliiy exists' and the Wlicunt Is proposing j to trytrucs a vtadital office building so tha%)�dditio ►rat medical and dental services May be Provided. :Recreatianal fatuities rushed by bus or 9n Gtr transportation. The area is toll wafted to a senior ro�eci;�, M earlier project" the heritage Part Apartments, is located an Lowlita Court the NO Abarhood owerircial Center to the north. v yelt Zncentivas• -2n order to achieve an attractive an- r` 4MIC. a yso—vt senior develtpent ns;entiv, including roifcL'_ SHM offers, a pnduction in eftruired on -site parking to a minimum ratio of .1 nwa� covered spaces,Aer unit; o d)sns.ty Manus Or Increased land use density under the -r General Plan or both; and Fee waivers and reductions. y1t�. l C PLANNING COMISS1 +TIFF REWAT r GPA "'M"A ODA 81-0 TA£ OEVELOPMT'nRP~WI100 " r W &WVa 4 2987 �Y.-- ' t4. 09valo 11: Aort �rnt _!vi der fih S1 r >`�tay tN�u3ir► #}�terT x ..— ,w�purpose ,W tho - Senior Housings tror3ay - J _ - PLANNING COMISSI rAFF REPORT lr GPA 87 -04G & ODA g/Z105 rpz DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION September 23, 1987 Page,4 The applicant is requesting a change in the General' Plan Land Use Map from Low- Medium Density ("' dwelling units per acre) to- -litjh DensitY (24-30 dwelling units per acre). The 4901cant Is also' requesting a density bonus to,.,- allow an v*ra"- der�ity of 34 dwelling units per 4crri. The a ""f It dill provide One (1) non- covered paring space par unit. The applicant is not requesting waiver of fees. ataff recommends ','entering into a 30 Yogr Devela*mt Agreement with, the applicant under the terms of the SgM for affordable housing for Senior Citizens. For purposes Of tha agreement target tenants are persons who are SS years of age or older, a4 whose hot3 ,k*gld inco4aes do not exceed 8ft of median income for San bernardino<Cpunty as defined by the Federalc, Deparim t 09--- V49in4 emi Urban Development. Two and four person °o� _ `172es ail used respectively Co calculate;ellgrdablis ':> 0112 aria! two bedroom 4par�erit sis.s:_ Stiff recd J he fallnainq terms for the Development Ar?eement. ,� n f= o Approval, of a' three story 270 unit senior ; project. o Approval of the Generti( Plan Land Use and Development District limen*41a is plus 4 density bonus to allow a density of 34 dwelling units per, acre, r 0 Apl+roval of o;�,(i) parking space per uni~ Based on the pr.:3ent i4pilabil'ityW 344 existing units in two projects built undo, �S;W proyisi®ns using the two and four parson household rental formula, the need ,far this price range senfor apartment is close to being met. B. Existing and .nr ',osed _440 Use: The hoisting 12eneral Plan land use ' das `gd'; on s ON- bum i,.sity single family residential. The Low - Medium Density designation provides a buffer betweom the Neighborhood Co'.imercial and the �Ojacent single family residential neiftorhood. idith appropriate siting, landscape treatment and parking, a proposed senior project Would continue to provide such a buffer (Exhibit "D "). C. Density: Through the GenerO Plan Amendment - process, the,. aPcVnt is requesting an Increase in der-ft from Law >�I'd:,` Residential (4,8 dvellina units _,liar acre to ,Wish D nsity Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per ,acre). Additionally, ender the Development Agreement which will°be required by the SHOD, the applicant is requesting a density. _gilus tq._ allow an 4 of 'r h 6 41:v. PLANNING COWISSI "AFF REPORT" GPA 87 -04G A DDA .bl -05 - i'AC -DEYE1,OP ,eilf w�RpOtiATdl StPUMber 230 1987 slti=te densii ' Of 34 dwelling, units, per acre. Density seryes as an iccticato`of' intensi*y of osea !l senior project is a lower ihtensity use /,Oak, ctlwer �lu�° -family r�tsidiantial 4 Prodwi For of�pf rr;,� in a xantor If's there A" typttal ly ` s pradlo inaw a of apt ; rtf n housr ds opeerating "less titan me iet0mbiie par househol,k llw suit is a reduced demand on !r` infrssteucture and servi wis. ierefora a dmnsity of a n'for prolrt.t Mill hot sis"Ificantiy grease efts€ intensity 00and use. Y. ENYIiIOia�iil°AAL S IT., in prOparI ` tlh! ' nvirona n �'= ins- Mant" S a sted that the a 11 t s' i s traffic pp ran upp y 11 stU0. After the traffic infaM.Otion has Melvedr and revfe"4, Onvfrenwsental °cktarwwlinstfon tit VI bd. . 1 YI. iRESPONpfI:E; This item his be" advertis ed s. a plfi- lletrinu a e 3w a rt newspaper, noticas ,ware Sent to all k p ownters n ��+st of the�project uite� aftd` the property his,. ,l ".wan pwssed with a x W supplowntal notificatisft sign. YIL REM NEWATUN: Because the Davelopment gree t his mot' been j i inaTize an a Projoct- design and site plan reviews 'have not beery- cogleted, staff pajonl p9s'is ,. that the Planni"g Coaeeission G' review and comment on thb applittt -Jon for a change in land use and J Increase in density, for the purposes of provid Q a 170 unit senior housing project u7� ,�s fire SHOD and. coptinu the public `iteari_na until October 28, 1907. �y I QtSpL�4: fully submittedy Br ltr City annex BB:MB:vc Attachments: Exhibit 'A' � Vicinity /Lana llae Exhibit "g" - General plan,:Land U`5e kap Exlw bit'%" - Development Districts Map ;1 Exhibit "D" - Site plan r i _ r ----�- CITY Or, RANCHO CUCAmol.VGA AQ STAFF RPf�T'� _ DATE: September E3, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Plannip Commission FROM: Brad Buller, city Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Assi'stanU Planner SUBJECT., ERYIRQWa kkTAL ASSESWEN gsaes aENERAL P il�AMENDMENT #T 87-0411 a 40WRO Zne Land use o a "era an ir6m Lea- ftliura Residential (4-8 r3Zl i*qg units per acre) to Office for 1.69 acres of land located on the west side�of Archibald Avenue,. south of Base Line Read - APH: 208- 031 -17. $4. 63 66, and 5f. EMKItf itTAL ASSESSMENT Aki3 DEYELOPOW DISTRXT ve oilmen. S r C " e requ t linen e dwelling units a.ap � owdl+4ed, #uam Resident #al {�8 per to Office Professi"al for 1.69 ac►es of land, Tocate� on the crest `side ',if Archibald 4vWnj South Of:- Line TOd d APN. 2WO31 -17, 54, 65g � 57. S6 and I. AWVRAC ty The appi,icant is requesting a General Plan Amendment and ao:r' c note on 1.69 gross acres 9,f land in order to build an 8,150 square io ? >t medical office building as part of a dcvel.ment Package, aubeitted tinder the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) Of the Development Code. The package,,alsb includ*s the proposed C 170 unit, three story senior apartment complex, as well pis a General plan Amendment and zone crtange on the 6.6 grass ac es of land needed for the housing-.project and a Development Agr )lnt At this meeting the Planning Comar ssion is requested to rei Jana om cment on the office component of the package and to conti-(iki the ' public hearing to October 28, 1907 fer Planning Con0jiasion r'ecaandations Ito the City Copncil. II. BACiC6ROtAJrU: title Oenerrl "Plan Amendment and Developeftnt District n ee'�K —were initiated by TAG Development Corpration. The • property is boUc:ded on ;the north and east by commerC? PLAHNING�OOMMISSI AF'F_ REPORT GPA 87 -M A DOA ;bt -Lei - TAC DEVELOPMENT . Septeeber_?3, 190 gage 2 III. PROJECT AND.,SITE'DESCRIPTION: Applications for an aareridament to tho an se it n and to the Devel5pnent Dist° :ct un Yfth a proposal Vor d*v I4*nt n the subject site a :4 a seni�yr FMC-AO ltr<.to the west. =` :, - A. Action kequested. -,The applicant requosts approval` ,ot applications o aarerrd the Land Use Map of the General bias, - "and the Development Districts vAp frox LowllModium e4hsity Residential to Offlce Professional, E. Locate tion: Archibald Avenue south -of ft Line Road C. Parcel 1_,- Size: I.G acry D. SUrtqu Ilding Land Use ajd Zonin (Exh!. ,, ij *A*, Ind "c" )- loyal '. South - church; Lft ftneity► Residential- l "24 dwdling units per acre) East - Coeerercial and Singlre Fancily Residential Neighborhood Aaraeercial god Loaf Rensity,Restdenti-eI (2 -4 dwellirN,' nits,per,,*cra) West - Vacant and chr�straas TY4% l441, LOW- Mdiuer ° I Residential ( ,,a dwal' "�ng units per acre? E. General Plan- Deeinat 0ns'I(Exhibit xR "1; � a c , it- s entf -I `T4 4 dWel l iog units per acr*) North - Neighborhood Comorcial J South - Lora Density Residential (2-4 dwelling Unitz pvr acre) East - Neighborhood Colimkial and Low Density Residential movel dwelling r 1 Kest - w- Nedium R identiel(4 -9 dwelling units per A$tra) F. Site Characteristics: The topography of the site slopes Lserrtiy- o a sou eas , av ng about a 3% grado. Trtree single family ' residences with detached garages now ciccupy part of the site. These existing dwellings vraui1y,becaare non- conforering uses with I adoption of the amendments. 1`hese units wound be scheduled for darolitiaa with develoWent df the medical office site. ' one residence has a built�fil swivilinq pool. The southerly portion of the site is used for a Christmas tree farm. j IV. ANALY5I5: A. Com ariyon of Existing and Pro osed Land else: the applicant k f reques s a ertera an n n an zo►ae c ange frae'.Lew- Medium Residential designation to Offiee Profeiiional ' designation On 1.59 acres of land. The 'applicant has also submitted p=lans for project approval of a'�.8.,15a square foot .` medical office building (Exhibit "D"). PLANNUG COWISS, '-TACP RE RT fPA 87 -0411 s DDA yr -06 -� TAC DEVELOPMENT September 23, 1987 Page 3 The ptesent Low -Redt. Residential land use designatiaaa. serves as a buffer between the single Ep 1 residential Hens bborhood to tho ppath from the ti:oa�terciai areir adjacent to the ntersectibn of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Read to the north. The Proposed Office Professional use= coup Oita function as a si�lar buffer p ided .the s,te would be designed sensitive Ito the .issu ofatbac,``s, Parking/ circulation, landscaping, 4nd' build ng design to 'Haase that the medical Office use would be compatible with'`adjacent residential uses.. *0 chVrch d [rectly south Of the P �v is )' within the Low LEnsitar 00den�97, zone and also functions`ss f, Part Of the Medium intensity lana'use buffer zone. B. Circulation: As part of the eni�ira:>eeer4taleviaw, the ` app cis sated to submit 'additional TnforaAtion about' traffic which will be generated by the, rodect. This s information has not yet bears receivod. �. ENVIRONF1ENiAl ASSESSMENT: in preparing an Environmental `~ F acs _ r s a traff quested that the deverl r eivstud. After the traffic nfbaation I re I' Find reviewed, an environmental determination will be made. VI. CORRESPONDENM fits itaaq has been a4i'rertised as a public hearing H e a �q ort n,*wS a ry notices were sent to tli property,_ cranrr3 tiin`°�,aet pf proJV-'t site and the property ha �r been Posted with a 4 x 8 suppiawntal notification sign. Vii. RECOM NDATiON. Staff recommends that the Planeing Commit J) elvieeww and cUnent on the office component of the applicant"i propOSal to build a senior citizen project under the Senior iCou:in� Overlay District of the Development Cdde and continue the public hearing to October 28, 1987. Resp l ly' Su ft , 'a 1 r City PI Her.`, BB;14B, vc i ;(ctachmants Exhibit "A" -, Vicinity Map Exhibit "8" - Existing !,and Use Exhibit-IT" - Existing Genera"r Planticning Exhibit "Q" - 3i,te Plan PE� it J DBS SLOP9O�NT AGRXMQ rs NO. 0a -o.2 SENIOR CITZSdEHBr ho3TSYl[ffi THIS AetikEMLN'T" i8 entered into as Of the "Erie ctive Dateff set fcrth`herain by and between RZT Riff- ^.[CaMR, dba WOURSE DBVIILOFXUT CC)•, a Yole Vsaprieto=shig; (''Dev610per -) and the `CITY Cr C11O CUC3lYON". a munocipal corpoVation Organized ; and existing under the laws of �Tthe ¢stQQate Of California (�ci ticM) A. Reeitals. (i) Californir Government Code Ssct.jons 55864 et seq.." �! authorizes cities to enter i:ic binding development agreements with persons having legal Or squ3table interests in real property for the dciolopmektt of such ,property, (ii) California Gavernmeni Code Sectfon s�9a5 provides that a city mr"y, by agreement with a de* ✓r�lo bonus over ,that allowed b t. par, (rant a density development cede and lanai u�Eee element "Of � the g®snnel�allplan wkstae developer agrees to construct housing for lo-o incOii* senior f households. C a (iii) Developer has requebted City to consider the approval of a development agreement, with a density bonus, Pertaining to that real Property located entirely within City, the common ,and legal deascription c1 which is set forth in Exhibit "",',,.,attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and y.nreinafter is re¢erred to as "the Site," (iv) The site is now zoh,d High Residential with'a SeOior Housing Overlay District puiiwant -.to the provisions of City's Development; Coda, as amended tc date hereof. Developer and City desire to provides through this Development Agree,%ont more specific development controls on the Site hich wi11� provide for maximum efficient utilization of t+' the site in accordance With I sound planning principles. (v) The Developer proposes`to construct a senior housing residential project, includin g Jow income units, within, the City. .Said project contemplated by Developer will require an increase in the maximum density as currently proviaed in the Senior Housing Overlay District. NO It is the desire of City to encourage developments, . designed to provide affordable tQntal units for senior xesid8nt >s of the City. Zn furtherance Of that desire, the City is here�1y � r "� ;T7 36 willing to grant a density bonus to Developer as provided by the torus of this Agreement. (vii) on 1988, City adopted its ordinance fro. , thereby approving thin Development Agreement with Davaloper and said action was effective on x 1985. B. NOW, THERErORE, the parties he�jsto ogre, ,k as folloras: Z. Definiti=-&. in this Agreement, unless they 4aontefxt otherwise recq ,'ti *es, the: Sol:.oxjng terms shall "have the following a. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucaaonga.'' b. "Project" is the.dvftlopmsnt approved by city _comprised of one bundrod ,seventh (170) apartment unites, recreational and common area facilities, one hundred seventy (170) parking spaces and other amenities an the Site, all as set forth more geally in the site plan for Development Review 8lt-33 submitted by uetveflc per and approved by City, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by this reference. The site plan attached as Exhibit "Bli includes various conditions of which are ,approval net chat:gad, altered or modified by this Development k„ Agreement unless specifically not forth herein. The project also includes the records of the applications ' by DeVOloper, the proceedings before the Planning Commixi6an and City Council�,of City on file with the City and all such records and files in these matters are incorporated herein by this reference as though set r forth in full c. KQualifiedi Project Period" means the first day on which I the residential units in the development are first available for occupancy by Qualified Tenants and continuing for thirty (30) years. f �i f. d• "Qualified Tenants" shall mean persons or households who are at least fiacy -five (55) years or older and are senior citizens as defined in Section $1,3 of the California Civil Code as said sectlans are written as Of the effective date of this Agreement. KLow, Income Tenants" siha.11 mean Qualified Tenants who also also possess an Income equal. to or- -lesm than eighty percent (80) of the current County ''of ran Be nardino 2 IL LA median income as determined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Davalopasant pursuant to Section a of the United states Housi:fg Act of 3337. In the .)ant such federal determinations of area median income are discontinued, other means to determine the median income, can determined by the City, shill be establishrj for the County of San Besrnardine, at mighty percent (80 *) of the area median income, adjusted for family size and revised annually. e.; "Affordable Rents" shall mean those rents chargled to Los Income Qualified Tenants, which rent shall be on an annualized basis equal to @+r leas titan thirty percent (30 %) of the eighty percent ($04) of the c.'urrent '`mdian ' ' income a.` :!xtablished for such Qualified Tenants. For Purposes of this t)efin# -ion, X&Its charged for all one (1) bedroom units sha ?� be subject to computation based• on eighty percent (got) of the median income for aa-two (z) person household. Rents charged for all two (2) bedroom units hall be subject to cvrtputation based upon eighty percent (Soli) of the median income for all households for four (4) or more persons. f. "Effective Date" shall mean the 31st calendar clay following adoption of the ordinance aoproving this Agreement. by Cit ls City Council. 2. Bgcitais. The recitals are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced and enforcea%i a as any other provision of thin Agreement. 3. Interest p# PLQ]?j= • Developer „arrants and represents tnat it has entered into an escrow or an agreement by which it is to acquire full legal title io the real property of the Site and that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement. This Agreement shall not have any effeaC unless and until Developer acquires fees titles to the Site, which acquisition must occur an or before the Effective Date of this Agreement. Should !Developer not'. "quire fee title to the Site on or before the Effective Date, t1, `Aareement shall be deemed to be null, and void and of no force o,,, 'Fact. 4. Binding Effect at A ement, The Developer hereby subjects the development and the land described in Exhibit "k,`Iiereto to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth 'in this Agreement. The 'City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, ,reservations and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Developer's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Development. 3 j-4 Patch and every contract, deed or other instruli�,ant liirdi.naftor executed, covering at—convoying the development sir ally portion thereof shall conclusively be hold to have becz executed, delivered and accepted subect to the covenants, zeesary tionJand restrictions expressed in this jgreemsnt, rQgardlassa af� ionz, :a such covenants, reservations and xastr�ctfoasu are sat of'tsrth in Such Contract, deed; -or other inatrestrl City and. Developer hereby declare their underatareding li and intent that the burden df -the covenantsu, reWorvationa and restrictions set io: th heroin touch and concert the land in that t( the Developer's legal intarest,,in the devrrl aunt is rendered less valuable thereby. The City and DOVO : fir herby furtbftr declare their understanding and intent that tho benefit of ; _3ch covenants, touch and concern t44 land by ft-hAncinq and increasing E the enjoyuent and use zf °the >- Dovolopwant t`y Quslified Twtaerts, k the intended beneficiaries *f such covenant+b, tease t�d restrictions, and by furthers the ]public P �sh�r: which I this Agrsta,�eunt ia' adapte:l. - p'stttheer, the paxtiae hark o that such covenants,- resa:�arvations and restrictions benefit all c Other real property loca'�ed in the City of Rancho CucaMoAgta. 5. ReTationWV At P=Z - It is understood ti.at the contracti,, ti relationship between citir and Developer is stkr, that DeVGIOPer is an independent party ancr13,s ., t. the agent of Citgt x Purpose whatsoever And shall i'1ot liei considered to be the agent of City for any purp"a uhatsceyor, k &_V&tment. The term of thrt: Agreement shall goMmence on the effectiV #"date and shall 0.11ixe iJairty (Jo) years adi� the comwancemah._ �f the Qualified i+V00"% P*riod, so long es Developer ; .-emajns ;n material con pl'�a�x � ^� -A this Agreement, as frora time ;co time amended. Ltpon the cancl: =a;�:t� a the Qualigied Project Period, and the expiration of tt.—_! ewaerit; herein, the' 'Vroj*tt shall be made to t::yieform with all hens treed appliaab3Es I tvelopmont Cc�� - provisions. Thies Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated automatically if 17c�velopor obese not obtain a Cartificat* of Occupancy for the ez.tixaty of -the .Project within throe tD years of the effectives data. EWAtrietim gn a JN11,.tentnts, occupants, and re residents f apartment units in ,,;ate 1'�a;(act shall Ls QL ;.11fied Tenants. said apartment units S=ill, nos' lase =entsad, cC.ci?z�ied, ! leased or subleased to ocr_upants who are not 'QUalifii'd Te�*tants except as provided as follows: � a. A person or person who is not a Quali«iiad Tenant,'and is at least forty- -five (4S) gears of age, may 'oe --upy an apartment: unit if he or she oc9tpies an apart nt "nit with a present occupant who is a QUalifise Tenant,_ 4 j and w1p provides rime ' primary P y�sica5` or ecaizomic support to swdh Qualified Tenant, ti b• Apellson at least forty-five 45 the spouse of a Qualifod Tenant' Years PY a�unit with such Walifisd Tenant; and ' c. A person or Parsons under fifty -five (55) yeare of age may a..cupy apartment units as temporary tanant s for a period of time not to exceed three (3) rAnths during any calendar year. s. �p5t $t13►tg� R :gy al_rNm« During the Quaiifii�d Project`: Period save tv -!N. percent (75 *) of the units in th Protect shall be r0 tali, lasssssesi, or held available for a inco� Qualifi.~3 Tenants a nffcrdable rents, as defined sa herein.. Additionally, at 14int sixty (60) :lays prior to any increase in rental ratss, as c4puted by the terms of this AgreouentC the Developer shall provide written notice of such incrwase to tt: City and all affactod tenanta. 9. Mintam tiQ1 St1: P.gnUa .1izring the torn hereof, all apartment !.+nits in the Project shall remain rental units. No apartment uhf in the project szhaU be eligible for conversion from rental z�)its to co+1dominiums, tcWnhs. uses or ar other common intrarest *t divisicn 41thout consent of the City Council. lfl • 2'L-%L Manager : A .�Ull -time Auntgar shall he proyided on the 'Pro j e3ct aita. Tenant V=R ttaa. Reid dents shall hay ,* the . , 3 ht to establish a comztitts> a camped ad of tenants for the purpose of ' organizing social activitlei \and providing comments and suggestions to the Developer \regarding that operation and facilities of the Project. kIthing in this section shall tlei' deemed to restrict the rights of individuals to organ ce activities and provide comments to the Developer. 12. suh�m� }� 2f araterial s and &=MAI am-dm- Priam is occupancy, Developer shall submit to City tenant selertion procedures whict shall detail the methods Which Develo ,per shall use to advertise the availability `o:? ,apartments in the ! project and screening mechanisms 'ohich Developer intends to use to Ii - atit the occupancy of the apavtsents to Qualified -V ants and loci < Income Qualified Tenants. t On or before March 15 of each year following the, commencement of the Qualified Project Period, the.Dev*U'tper, sal its representative, shall file a certificate of cI"bntiriu,ing t) - � �1 Program comrliance with the City,. Each such report shall contai�rj such information as City may require including, but.•,not limited to, the following: es. R*"t schIdules then in effect including utility Charges cif any); ' b. A project Occupancy profile�'...hcludi:�g age,` reside-it and nuaber of autonobilss owned by Preside residents; A descripti.on'of all writton coNVIAi,-It reiid&atz r received from ^ met; ; d. A cartificatic+n that-low incme req[uirsasrtts have has e. A ? ist of substantial physical, detects in �ths i�sr' ct 4 Including a description of repai *ior aaintenance work undertaken during the reporti,nr ..�rea* ant! f. A descriptxv ofm physical canditian -and maintenance . Procedures for the .project including . anrtmsnt units, , _�ldscapiLg, walkways and recreational areas.- City shall be allowed' to cdoct5,,� ins ctio s o Project as, it shall deem n�±Cessa cps ✓ insPsetions do not unreasonably3 nte�rferadwith ':a narman f the operations of the jert and reasonable notice is psov��., The City shalt urti:or be allowed to conduct an flnn wl survey of, �\ residents in the Proyact in order to eS948Q senior needa. F 33. Tenon. s, l+ect�on nont�ac 3j I A= ,,,-,On receipt of._ ^n arplication rfor low Incose occu a shall date, ire the 0; �ibility oi' the �Occupancy Oc a , ` Developer Of this Bev.�opment Agteiement. verificatiart o tgnent the tersus -: el gib333ty shall include One or more of the following fac.�orsa a. Obtain an income verification form from the Security Administration &,%d/or tAi* californixi -� Department, of Social -qarvicss, if the applit'Anr. `1 raceiy^s L� Coz* from either or both agencies;,, b • Obta" 4n incomo tax "turn for tht, most recent tax year; C. C6ndu0t, a TRW or similar fi;nanciat scratch; do r,btsin an incnats verificatioli' from All current e oyers: and '? G 2', a. It the applicant in unemployed and has no tax ratukn, obtain another farm of indey*nde:nt viorificstion. Developer shall be entitled to rely on the information` contained in the application sworn to by the applicant. All agreements for rental of all apartment units in the Project shall be in writing. Tb's form of proposad rent or lease agreement shall be reviewed and approved by City prior to thsc commencement of the Qualified Paoject Period. such agratiumt shall inolude all rules and regulations governing tanazcy witiin the Project. and regulations shall include r j The rubs authorize the keeping of sxgl� peta,, :Vithi which specifically p g pets a thin all _ apartment unite. 14 Ri'. gUm iC Baal. R tenancy may be tarminaatad V0 the term :nation being daee=od ar, eviction t::.3er the follcVii, circumstances: h. 'Ti?a deats of than sole- tenant of the unit; b. By the tenant at the as=piration of the term of occupawecy oZ othea,•wJ sty upon thir.y (30) d. ys+ written notice; C. By abandcAAnt 6f the premises by the tenant: or d• By tailxire of at tenant to execute or renew a lease.. ; Any termination, of a tenancy other than 14hose listed above 3 thie paragraph 14 shall constiti :u an evicticn, Developer shall only evict in compliance with the provisions of California law and them only for material noncompliance with the r.*" of the rental agreement, 15, JA2" pes� �d*DZX- Residency pre *,fence shall be possible to applicants tc the Pr -Q6!, who have been regsidents where the City of Rancho Mcaamonga. kowaver, that factor shall not bey. given priority ovtr the other, elements of Qualified Tenant selection as st=ated herein, 16• H rand 1M%g once. Developer shall ko +p the Project and all Imprcrements thereon insured at all timer „�gei et lo or damage by fire or other risk COW:4. 2d by a l st;mdard extended coverage Endorsement and such other risksp perils or covara�fe, ass Developer i4- determine. During t1+ tarn heriao fT the Project *hail be` insured to its fold irisur�`t,;,e replacat;•it value. _ 7 _ 100 E. PCs J `t s7• i�t l�E L�r-- axts� *• DOV614por shall. (,amply Vith &1,t c#.t� Makintenancse Standard* enasntad from t izit to time;w Prot3tX r- The f l*wrirq ap+a =ific restrictiana thall apply l �. to the use of the Site pursu4mt to t.hi* Daveelopaent Ayz�+et>eteez�t !i a, only razidunt #al uses of then zeal propwrty shaell, b s. i Permitted in the Prof as.; . 9 b. The naximua 4WWity of reegjdow%tl k, dael:ii ng uxeita. itt i the Project 0-all j3+ewer •� at�e�. ��+aers 3�.0�. dwelling unites peer C=4e c• Th,x maximun height ra—'the high"t pjropoxod bui4dintl 44 the pxo ect shall !aa' fifty -fly s (as) fosti d. t110 maximuse Six* for all tbwg buildings WW sa;uarsa foatacie for *40h Of the apartment i� p�eeaee lWat' in the project *hall be as xSt forth in Exhibit wl;h attayhed hereto; and n• Us proviasions,tor rem *mv etion o *� dedication of ion; for public pttrPoeees are C*Atet- 2--Wdt' in the canditiono for approval, of mveloposlat 12aeVV V �kX33 9. DAYAL22X#= Z' um. ' hw -'amity wtil,l" "grant Devi icper following development incea�ttivat fiefr`da��reXapae�� of this pto��J' aa. TAO maxilAuft density peer ,sovee on the 81 t* shall be "r inoroastd to 33305 dwelling units per aecrel b. The maexiWU number Of required off - street parking aspac tx *ball be lowered to one (I) parking apace pe dweel.ling unit., and b, C. City r *quir*%onts fdx covered parking spaces th Waived in their entire, 24. 3 # E "a 'CJ31ZA"1 she p open space, buildingpt and individual uPartZentO. Shall W,:;,,, with physical amcnitias catering to the needs 4nd d *sir *s seni0 oitizon residents. In sddi_tion to those 04y�diti,on shall be sabstantial.ly includedsInott.e projectaioaa reeeetti a.' Eleeva.ar service, sha l ``bet provided to all upper apartzints; All units $hall be d4 sicJMed .for Oandicap acc*aaat� 4. 4. All units shall r- osatss ueoured entrywayz "d f a Commaz enclascdl hallway, d. Handrails shall be providsed in ail hallwaysr e. Building a,pscO shall be devoted tar Mstings; and f. Reacreational" azanitiesa shall includeej but not limite4 to, 'putting greans and 4?3 �Iffleboard courts. DOVOiopa� agrees is and gih 11 held City and its elected OiZicials, a 000.-s, agents and 4plovasx ' , haaemlens 'from li"il#Y f_Or Aasages oY shims fm, damaexe far Fersonal injuries, dixtain,g death, h04 claims for prbpe ,ty damage which may arise from they direacw or indiract operations aie NV5104r or ' hose of his contrac�r, aubcamtt�; :tar,;, �geng, ersployse or other person aectinc` - . i biee which ralate tr) the Project, Devolopear agrees to '�i 6;411,aer ono City and its e1e <.tgd officiarls, offiCOV5, agent* and "OX00 OMS with rWfact to i actions for d"agoe csused .or alleged ta'RaVQ bean -caWod by reason *f ZQvela;per'.a aotii-itjor. i;l ccrr.,1eation With t,I pzoja t. This 'sold y arx!QS% pr*ViniaA aplslitb to -fill drrmegea and :lai>as 7tGr daffia yAt suffered or ' 1*ged to USVi3 bean W113."a °�*FiYQE2i �► reason of the aperz t ore r�s.arzsd tb in t4is DSVGlO9*gQnt AAgx-ikere nt, regardless of whethaar `or• not th4 City prepared, auppl ied or approved Vat plans, specifications or other do- _=erxts for the. Project. 22. MrJA- This Agre *want may tae amended, or canceled, in whale or in parts only by rautaAal writt � kn conrJeAt of the parties and then in tho xa:-sncr providaed for in C�tliforris devernment Code Sections 65Es_ et soq. c; 23 • E f rceme r�, In the eve}.*7 S' r dcfalxit un3ar the provisions k this Agretasnt. by De:velcper, r_-It y shaU g#.va written notice to Developer (or ittA ,succesrrsar� at t:hkV.address o2 tha prx ojact, _and by regiate:rad or derrtif:�ed sail addressed to the address stated in this Agroataar•t, and it such viol :a;tion is r ?t: corrected to the reasonatle satisfac+ti011 of City within thirty vio) days after . such �,10tice ice given, or if not, corrected whit ai,n such reasonable time; as may be _--aquiLed to urc the breacb 01. defaea :. $f said brrat:h or defaPAl4 canr.Ot be OltrA within thirty, (3f��.. dayva. (proiricdeci that acts to -are z the bribach or,� ,draiault must, be comrdinG4hd VIth n said thirty (30} days And-must thereeft r be dilar ,tritly pursued by Developer)", then City xay, Without' further notice, dect.are a default undar *his Agreement and, npcn,any Bach declaration of defauit, City may bring any ebtion necessary 'zo r � AML spacair'cally► enforce th8 cbiigatit ' ; Of Dev*lcper growi'nq caul, of the operation of this Deve10Pment ?�aroement, apply to any c.;urt, ZS i .. 'e - state or edeeraX, for ir:jvnctit,a ralie,�-,agairst any v elation by Developer, of any. iarcvlaeio�,i, of dies 7kg'tee�l�ent, orml�wAgr far su�� , othar r.�,ief ass iexsy t+aa at}s crisp *_CiCat.* I 2q • , RAF 1t D"tAP r is in default vmdeir �-�b to Pe Agr�crtnt upon thee - ftagponir,4 of Otte �, .. crab, mor!a� of e�venta or canditions; g• Zf a material ��anty, , repr+s.eet�tati�n o _ #tatomesnt i�c madle or " -fit vis}sac3 bte velnP*r `to Clty` ljmdt ij a false r- jVrovyga�t� hav*A btxan falxe in any respdtsrt �`t �" t was wades 1�• Tf a fi�sd$Aj acid datersination As Saft by a, city � }i r iEsallowism, an annul cavity pur`uant t tagra h 2 -hero inab�Avo, .span tcte ?psis of st�st trial ovfpdesykge that t3ev ?�opar "h i e not =' c � i omipil,eI itx� gao+�k 'faith wi K Oy a i1„ t+ anci" costd pions ref this gxs eat aita , ;3atiia±_ a.- cpportmrit� to r tare as leogr@ � d ire PW''Ag 'aPh 23 utreinabc v*; ;r er e• d brassyh" Daveio Kl� �' oil any esf - tho provisions -wr tsr-as "I of * .Um A reeseuart;' after 1tti9��',ce and OppOxtunity i to ourd as �PrOvided in paragraph 2.1 4etailpabove. j , lCity rides r*t q71taivee anyy? a► of day --at in pegrfarmanc* by &6 Roper iA on pfA,fpiadic City rev j ewr does not arsfogca off, tesreainate� thin .�{raeermef;'. �'�ngseai'amance by Developer shall xfct. b,% b*c,Auses -tox- .AkXcum�4. pe81 aatic�s bix �valoPe�' of the oial,;gutlotss i-�srein containja wtoulcx unprofita)�la, difficu3;v., r" a :x�sonsiver, or bseoasuso ` Of a faillure of any :third `pa�rt3r, or esnticyF oth�sr.than City. All Oth0r ,'vgmeditls at let or let Qguity which ewer not oU11tsr .41se provided for in E.�is A,gre,.emsnt cr in City #* r4gulaations gaverrian� dgve:logreetnt agrtcem'ants? "axs av4il4bke to then partits tz pursue in thet, ovoht t ti1�r� i a broac'!t. of thins DOVelgply ent &grcc%*nt. Nar`Rtaisw,+„ Y pity of any breach or default tutc:4f { this Dovelopmoht- hg�ra ,�3an� ashasll ber tleeaeed to , a waiver of any i��er auPssw�guen'� /bzaracPa default haraundeir. thereof ( � 24 Shnulciz,44,valepe�+,' place or cause to be placed any *4� :uet� J a ,or lie r� t�A �'o ? €cti of any part,theoraac� f�, "a bete) <, Cie ro � s, enctkmb�,ance ar -iifan. incluan b #, l : it !i :. snc ar,. ? of said .. shall Have: t�* righi at any time,dt�ri�ng th44, teem q,t ik'as ages` .. A reasmtnt ,$ d 5 sti the X448'. nCe r - of eg dt tncut�kzzssc a ofn ,,lien toy w"�AtM 110 ..Y r.. i fie. (gyp y O ,. it, � it <W a. n � acw� cr thing retuirad of `S eg er un this, Ag atme ..'i4anrl any Bauch act or tlti do.�.s o ie fo=,Ad {� :bk• Swnd sins: 'be no m;�fsetive a�i�.:.r! done by Developer. { i self; b. Reaiixa on ciie t security eaffo dew= �•;:�� nc:um ixancs or lieu by enorc�lasing.fore0X proce edin §s or power of sale ox cat or r*%cdy afforded M 14kv or in equity the socVrO4 dOctuaemt avid�scsing : t � �ancumbxatnce or -L on (J�aroinalfter rafarrod,,to �e pb'he frogs. d�Red") c. Transfer, coiiv&y or a�iE !ir thl� tiff rc o3� tleveloger to th�i project to any*, pura�i &ser at � faracloy�ure :Nola, t�htatiiezr the for*4, osVro gale be conducted p�*ouazit =to court ardor fix'- puruant to a :fir of sale contained 7 ; in,-e ;.rush` di 1 .and i a. R�guire and cc to the �asrerat Or, Developer by virtue of a l+asuxa sa%; "Other the fors- coneRlcterl pUrs, to m curt csf er ail 0 or pursuant t:) ) a pWor saf salts ,se�ntairt its a , sntet deed. r• 27. Ncstices JAS• city akistll givas ta►s�t`tes!rt notice o any default or bra�ci; undsr thini Agreement bj �rc�pe y corner to• finder and afford,Zvnder tl,e� oppa�rtunity.,aft*ti, sIrvica of the notice, ta4. , -, tr a. cure the breach or dsfault !r,chin aixt� (60) daiyr ., after sarvic4� of said nOtic4F' WI-liro I:h!s &rlfau2 can be cured bl•x��s paaysnt a ��apney. t� b, cure the brasach or d otault wi � + r �_xty (s0D gays after service o;� tgaicl notlae t►� ,, _ the breach 1! default can be .;uzad 'bra washing other that tha >'� paYAsnt of money and can be cured within; that V time: or C. cnra the bttach or default In `such roasaoaxabje t%,Ms as may be required ateara sotseathikO�'-bther .t'laan� paynent of money is' i4quired tax cure the `breach or ditfsult `and cannot be � perfnrat�sd w.�thire �4air1'.y ` (60) days Aftia`Z< said notic;it,, provi.d4id .tk!p.t acts to curs the breach; or defsult ajjj� bo ssrtaect V'�thin ' o '' . A sixty (601 day period attar eerwicr< of Said notice of diatault, an L�t or by city and)are the;,,%after diligently contfnu�sl bY'tend€�r. GI 2 . twithvtandin4,, any. otho** provision o this eeaGent, a �-r may forostal3� .sny aacti*6 by City for a breach or dof t under tho -t+arsm ofd, a s ig a ►nt ' t4vejopor) by coatrs+e, ai - Unga to torecs� Asa it Al pneu absrande � r lion on thii iProjec�t.. `' + prac�resA%a� so Co ned -Uy be :For j1*r"lCs!!7 Of teas en ra=* by otdor of ao'a�rt Or fo;v foreclosure, a , 6 c branaeUv-deii� aa" power of x4l9r Cantalmod iU the instrn.�asat a 1 V,:'a 4 -,uwbr*;%c* or lien. , 246 prow odingaczha 1, not, howeber, 1.6re*t#en a sy such 8 --tPA by c'he City for the default or breach a3* povs3,cs a "� ►1ess. -' a. ar+a c0=W, &gKi Within, ei� (60) *�aR after �� \ a ice a3n Candler Of _,the not � deer heri 41L b. They aeave, astTtar havira lTSen 4r` � nOod -,' dili4e:nt (/i Pursued in a?he >~ Set ,*r'e4 iA.l IOU to ac"10 on; _ 1 and C. 2,terada 3taeet a ti !' e_q *z% € 41i of mare t�ermsR C ee! to Odt ii sAiti-esn% Of . this eeaa eht requiring , the pan or *xp#nditur* of >oes '.bg `.Davaelppger: \7 until the ioxec3 ±w* pa;oce+edings f re ss±sm#�laete or gr $char ;ltd by "}et :IlDn shat, Ofaction Qr ��• 8 j *~ons jeratioq r the isii x' i a heroin Provided, City ae reeae ti^ Ml shall n C, dt�r na; the ' 64 this Agreement, -taker any aC�ioAi, tbee #gfe*t _; at whi ff:: wild' Res to t a:oaxtrol, d4twirnine or a�fasct the �'�nt>as far -,thaaea low incoxib rental, units in the 'Projedt. 30.' Mgt%• Any notice k*Viiid to be, '4iVAh by Vie: terms of this Agreement shah .beR F �a r d hN, cc #aEied sail. 'Urn o receipt requaktod, axt the a :ddross of the► rss r specifiQd I�erIL4 or" at. any pertiv mrtiog. -as specified b the y *rot* such z�ddrars at y bee la4t,4r• y Parties hereto« ��: To DivOlopear ' N'c)Urelee °Develc� nt Cc. 101, Dover aDri�t_ ; suit* r10 �. _Ng wport beach ,�.Californiae g,:3rj 5j ht ea�ticsa: : Oetaer W_, ho;lrse , f, Adak n 6 12 iv C, , fi0 �Ci+sy: Citv Of Ranch* rlucaMOngat 9320 BOO Line, Suit* C it -P-0- $tilt &0 Ra*�hO Ctacanonga, <Mlifornia:93r saesaes'aa, ma agog 31, AttyrnM' FMM. xn any proceedings- ariosirg Irom the �i enforce*ant of this , ola nt nt or. baeca -e of am all+egod bsrea,� or dofai'tl: heron. oki than prov*jlinq laar�y ;Isbell �+ ;as untitled to recover its: cost and ito roavonab_j -d at ornsys+ i yl fees ncurrod during the p> oo4� ng aas busy be 'fixed , attO n ys , discV*tion of the court,;._- n • �7s3a 14grs�'4oxat ..mil isins�y the 'bonofitsa and barxdatss kaaereOf as2xa421 inuro,:ta o rospoct vo �xaartion horeto f and theiz 3 ogaE3 reproaentr ;�$vos, yyc+ lsaria � d>sina� tratorn, r�ataccessors :ani aazs t a, r a+slrovor a :a nt ' roqui :es ;fir a<dmita. graeautait o tm 3 2sa r�3istsmod `3n Calif ancg wtttY arat governed by lm ria'. a# : tho S ;to Or r Califc+x�aiit. s $h3 InKulidt tY• Tf any prolAsions Of thin 'ApTeatent shall be dateaard to be invalid," ill al, or unonforceabla, the volidity, .legal,ity or or,forceebility of the raraining *,�*i.ia'ions hereof shall not in an vayZ be :affoctudl or ilupairaed ttla�teby., c 35. Racordstion � �ktlo 4groement. shah,,' at the expense of c, Developer— be r4corded in :the 0 , f ici igl , Records of ,the County Ytecardor df the C4ttax y of San Bas anardin&,, 3:N i!FYMM" WHERLOF, thin Agreament has been executed by r — the pa 3:N and ash be effective on the offoctive dais, set forth pare inalf%ivo. , i l CITY OF RANCtjs9 CUCiAMON 4A Dated: _ D�nrt a L. Htcut� ' �atyar 1 ' Pznk �1 « 3�OL11�Z* " dba �E NOx.51�SE MntopmT Co.', a' �r�lo E�rogria�:prsYx:�p - Aat�aci: ' et r Via« Neau3°e, Baer CQEiM or BAW BEXAMINO ) on 04 Notary Pvus q tr aaila COUAtir and Stato, petmonaUY proves to arse an the baaio of aatiaiabtts* a+ aieixf+a toa agn�ac' xaout+u3 ,tix3 .. osar?acariatea aeasisti orsas±� ui�e3a�r tE3aa'ne eat! w�xa :4tste f yt�t, aasCt Acit4xcstitS.a�r3rrsd 'CC) �k�t � GI�`Y Qi�: ,�ai� 5 CUCA 000aa ex0c6i:;4Dd ty S'ATS a 1: coum or on s ��8�7 `�t�,2�:R mas,, tli/t •,xarac�arxig�±�d�a iiotftrY PubX � ,n _grid f6�I! i d Gt ?iutty and Sttti, ptreorially �atppeared yy. ffifF =.'4i ands ]&tl SfY3 taali +�sl:k3:. ii$�swl�ft!sS"CAki t9�1CiP: tt1t __wad persons Who . +exa��cai;+sd thf *�,44� truvont its ..,:.,. :. and i cif NOURSE E YW an t aokna ac3 asd to sus tha, 2aat such Qt4ic-lrs are Author zed to t execute or halt of *Uch corp,4ratiox',* Rotary Publ C In and for s_. _.t :rr � \� % \1,34 \DAtdC1VRSF. \Ro-C< 6.4' 14 m a a 8�s- 47- 0ti ON=,._ CZTY +� am iE1'i3i*kt oy ,,C�"L THIS i GRZMM! Is entqz;94 intaU � Date}" sat fo2'th hararin by and b svesrr , 1i eat Mks I m db*iva D3R�L.11BH' \`t ii.IfRL1S N iNitfyfS� r as sole Vzoptirtorshi �"x � Jrsa") r WRRT am Y ST sir Ls California uilt urtzershsyV ("hest tnd ") and the OZ27 a8 =� , a m micipel COVporation organized and oxisting'-�sadsr the le4s of t_;�e State o! .�lifornia "City" - 1.Aa a23-. l nt ,ticrvoras�axtlt /eod'a� ions; 6311684at-seq. i unathzirasaa oiti to Mentor i de�sl t a ` with Perao�n having, I " al o, is for he clevo�l r� 1�e near N6ts in real. xoperty ®p�satrt ds�prorl. f , fi,� C6xiSarie�,l �vezniian:�: Coda. Sa�tien R�391S �.rovidea j -_ that a Ci: r t by agrsazent With a developer, qra iit a density boors over at allowed, kV the ikam, daim itY established in the, dGvslOPA*nt Code axed land ' uss alea6aett -eat tea ' + ��hah a davQ3oper agrees to Construct housi` g for low income r or 1 hous�italds, I E fiiij Naurse has requested City. to consider that a►g `reva►1- F of a dav�slogment *9r4smer►t,. ,with a density bonus, per°„ai3ain Ito E that real pr ptiarty 1o<.atec) eA-tiroly within city, the oa acn 1'�:1d legal description of whjiih is set forth in-�hlbit "A 4tta6hed 4 hereto and incorporated heroin by this rafa1once and bsroinafterf is referred to as "the :armor Sint;" C1 _- (iv) West End has regUost d pity to - considc\r the approval of ,A t olapsemt 'A$rAOment pesrta tn#ni'{ to that zany prop,Qrty located st- tirsiy eri lsin the City; ,the ,,common and legal dpgnrigatiars og which i3) ref isrth in Exhibit a"aehe+i hereto �t and ifcorporatOd herein by this r*fOresnce and ha�`l3 attar (s referred to as i4the OiiJod;Aits." M Herzinai'ts in'-this, Agx%� Imasnt, Nuurs* and Wjkast E�nd - are sometimes caller;, iv el%r referred to as tho 'OVwVOl,cg0 ell rt��`" (vi) The `1niak Sit* is nQW Z&ned High Ra 'ic3ahtial a Senior Housing Ov cIa riiatriCt „pursc��;nt to the With �� proviaicans � i,ty''s Development Code,. as, amended to date araa , 'law (vii) Teaser a"fice Sits is now, aasaad Office Prof'6sssioraaa3 to chant to t a s pro viauiAnt of Citypss Develnp>4 nt ��dea, sew asaendad to date �i®rees!f,; (vi�ti) Hours* proposesa to connCraact � acassiar housing Said project project, i�luditnc� iav inedw— Unit3, Itithin the city. Said grojaot cant" �,sy 01a3pas: Will saa;saira en increase in the maxim m density as , antly Vrovided ,ire thc, senior �ous4ing Ovte lay .Diiiatrict. ;t (i9c) &lest Znd prop*oo& tA% ='AstrU t a - ,ctary building, 4PPXQXi3RtoIY 12,400 spa t-o i'aet davot+s?d"to X":cal `,i office Use$. � Development Davalope 4W "Cie dmasaire tea r �,r�, i through thiu roetetarit 7k0ft s At c develo - %control o an the SvAlcr site and,thoFra 4jito sip which aail.X. vr V3,elVat Ior ssax3,3M r affici+tsaft rsti3li�s t , of both tJ$j" ,Jetsior i3:tea of fiat a5�i �tita, in accordance With aauna� -Plh aning ,princivals. m - {xi) on �_. :, 1968 cit2' z4op ^1 its _ Ordir3aszsce Pt�i. y appxay.kW this U':vas xopsent Agre*xent wigs DP ere ca1aerss and said action 's c 1goctivt or. .. p 19Et8. td ®w. ` siFc12D, the ;aartiiti! '.�.a2•+ete9 b7 =* At follows-. 3. Da nWZUW In this Agro5seott' i2n �F �l11p� the canto. ctherr:isaa r®gtaia*s, ties fallosuzrag tarmst.<ll �sav�' the following meaanina : as "Ci Cy" in th-, City Qf t a�tchc Ou'4a morga. ftra3ect" is the :development 1�rovrtd by City c0sprissod of QAO #Phdresd seventy (vo) 3part'moe unit's, i� recI r:a3tiaraaal and cUumo a aro& fihli.tiea, o. '10 - hund:r*d l ea�renty 4 (iryty) parkinsy. Spaaar: aan2 other I Sttaicr Sita, all as ssaet forth U0;',6 fttlly '-in the site t. plan for 'n'GV&I')9.A6rt RoViaw 8'7., 3:,;aubltit ted' by Nourto -rnd approved by city, a cagey Of which iv. a'ttn--had 1 h0r4ta, Larked as Exhibit "C" aani as ircarpcu a ad herein by tie a ro oreertra. , `�'he s3 to plain : attached as J Eah,ibit "C�" 4,n:ludoisn va,*`° (Us GorVAItianaas -oaf $pprovaai which are not, charigaad#`41tacr�4 ;tr modifU'i by tkAis Dev*10psent Agr6emont unl ".ac,= Vpljcifica lly set iarV- heroin*.-, Thoa pre je_-t also ).chid* s' the �etarda or ttae 71- 'PP --iOns by NoLrsa. tsit proceedings b+efay.,a the a PlaPning c:nmissioft and Catty Council of City' 'On l a =� f U77 with the City and all such records and tiles in thesr. �\\ aeatters art inc6rpar4ted her *. -,a by this referenca at 4 tk.;aeegh set 'forth C. "Office Project" is the Bevelt�,�ent, a sit oos PpraVed bye 1' Frise� of a twin ty -two tha% sand: four hundra f �,4uQ�. +square foot aedic al 'as�Et� building, one hundred axut tsa :lve (11 I ;Arking `;sLaaaes and „gat2ser amenities he than Office Sits,. all, as ,set forth Aorta fs3llir in the S'�tai Plan for Davalr 87 °36, submitted by west &-A t Review Ho. W4 t- Wroved by ity, a copy of which is attach, hereto, sarkeesi as�C Exhibit "Y!" and is indar; 6kataed herein- by this reference. The Site Plan attach ed �sibit "Cry in.:ludes various conditions Of apprrrval,:which we not clanged, altered or sadified by thine_ Aewelopu*nt Ayreestr t unless speCSig�,cax ly Beet fcs".h herein. The c�gticaa project alSO includes vhe retards of t;he aPPlications by lust &ds the proceedings be Qts N1.e Planning CQR:Ii$2iom *-nd City C�nail "�f g'ity� �< on zfie with the a; ty and records aril files in _ thews a`atters are inccq*ratad herein by this reference as though "t, forth An gull. d. f°Qualified P= -*Jtct Pariod" (i) For the,Senior Project, the first day on which the residential units in the d*VAfirst d are" first availa?ale for~ occupanty by Quali�ie`1 Tenants anO cortintling fof, thirty (30) years. � (11.) ror the Office Project,, the date ofi issuance Of a certificate of acganoy for the first office spaca ins tti0 develOP.Ment and continuing for thirty t t3�3 ywa�aw. _ e- "QualifidA Tenants" shall sawn �a�rasonu or h ®usehnl�fs I v9to are at least, east 2'��ty ®five (5s) years OrL older and are senior cit#jas as ;,Iefined in Saaticn 51.3 ©f the California Civil C� a as salt# ssatio�n�s at��se wr ,tteri s of the Effective date of th4.s Agra sent. "Low income Qu&*t1led Tenants" stlall mean Qualif,�,ed T*nants who. also 'poss&ss an income equui to or Ieae; �tha eighty, percent (80%)' the current County of San F3+ssts�trda:sc median income ,ds detarmi-ned by the. Federrel„ Depnard Of Rousing and Urban Development purauant J, o ;S4tin�i0� S <� of the United fates Mousing het of 193_ in the ce�:tsnt sun',% fedeexal datermifiatiots of area Median interne are discontinu ed, or,har means to determines the' me iiarl " income, as determined b the City, $3L�'! 1 be estats�is?xad !or the f" ) �Jn:of San H6rnardi4o, at sighty percent (8at 0 area ttedian incoxv, adjust" for family size and revised annually. f. "Affordable lentsm shall mmsan those rants charged to LOS IncaM Qualified Tenants, which rent shall be an an annualized . basis eclnal 'to or:' isss than thirty percent. (308) Of the sij-u -t•y percent (808) of the current median incONO au 48tabl12fii%A- for a`uch Qualified Tenants. For purposes cs*°_this defitYition, roAts charged[ for all one (1) br r1ro - tits Wa4ll tt sahject to Computation based on eighty percent (&0 *) ag, tht mmwdion incomms for ae two ;2) per son household. Rant,,* Char'ge�d for all twt* (2) bedroom units shall be, subj'sct to corPutotion based upon eighty pa .-Cent (80) of the median incom+e for all households; for four (4). or ;Nose perl4at. g. " Effective Date" shall sass" the 316t cal#ndar day following adoption of the 4Vdinance approving this A9ra:sa41At by city's City CCAU%Cil. t- RWJJ &- Th* recitals are part of tits agreement ls> woen the parties and shall be enforced and enforceable as any other provision of this Aggaen*nt. k 1. intereaEt gg Frapc__ r _tv .: t P:. Atourse warrant x and reprasonts that it &tags .ntered , into an ewcrow or an n reement by which it is to acqui.rc full legal ti *_sea to the .real property of the senior Site and that it he,a full legal right to enter into this Agreement. This AgreeZ4 t shall not have any etfact unless and until hours: acquires. fee title to the senior site, whi0r'acquisi ion mmuut occur an or. before the Effective Bates Cr :.his Agroesont. Should Hours* not acquire fee title to the Ssxrtior Site on or before the Effective Date, this Agreement shall be dewed to be null and void and of no foxca or offact. void b. !fast End warrants and represents that it has full, legal: title to the office Sit*, that it has fu11 legal right to enter in;o this Agroerent and that the person executing this Agraament on behalf of West End has }Jaen author3led to do so. `t• D, = 9,1 2 Agreemacnt; The Developers h*reby subject the senior Project and the office Project and the land described in Exhibits -%6. and "gN her4to to the covenants, reservations and restrictions S`3et forth in this Agreement. The City and the Developers hereby declare their %pacific: intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as net forth herein` sha`l be deemed covenants running with the land ands shaxI (sass to ;• 4 . art 1 a .. arc be binding Upon the Dsvelopers' auccoxworas a►�t$ assigns in title or i..Jtereat. each and eves�r c #ssL�raset, dead a other Project hetrei�tafter a "citt"I ceava�rinq or e:os3v iztsd thrii enure Prajeot orR the OCflcaa Project or any portion thoroo C 4h4ll canrlusit oly be held to ha�ave t*&n exact tract, d+aelivasr�� aas #d' ~' accePt� subject to th coj�arnmayts, a`taraitod, del .e:d'reatrict :erns 4xpxr4s!3 ;tai this tian aye , rog&rdlei?i!s zsf xhcth# auch cavesta�atts, ree+trvatieJno reatrictions" "are set `i'r,: 3: in such contract, deed or oth. c{ttetruata " city and OI and ltitent that the rd of t, hereby c oranta s*e�ifv o t=d n� restrictionarr jai __to �aers` Ouvb.� and co ,,�; . the 3 evelc – th* lin..n in that topers serest iat.,Zend*r <,�t :sea valuable thaareby. Thom City aaina'x�svei elsy furtslr dew 1a� �er_theix understaW;bg aer..d inte;at th'a+t they benefit c!! soh +ogsvensnt: touch and cone; rn the 1 ,j s ahcit9q aaaed fir- asps! use at $�s! Presjiict by future t*Mints t_. e�'�e enjoyaenk bnna6iiciarfaas .abrd+id eat ssuckt casvctssant ai, retetVV_ic� and rostricticns, ed�ia+�t ig the public; purasaaaa for w irttj s a►9xment in i t contrae,tu�i`io�aa S ski li; It is understood that the S. �e Deve.�opersa are lhde stydertt between oitY d t4►elop*rx it such that for an p parties and are not the agents of :city a Y +urpcs+ae e�,k�0*40$ver and shall not be �nsidsxad to be the 1 guts o ,City %r +any purpo" act what;;joever. wit its. The term Of the Agr*esaant eshalt comma i err. the effective hate and shall expire thirty (sot seam comer l 4;hat coassenceseaant cis , the Qual3fieei jesct period, so long, at { tt+ave o* *rs remain in rial castplianre wit:; this Agie+waent,, as j from tlxo to tine a .h,, . has sxpi,xation n Project and the Officg project ash —,, ��a calculated fo the SZyios Pdepending err: the coMencesrnfe of tlt+a >kalified Fro et t. ` Upon the ro j ecti h �f thief �,gree�eht a= ,.Provided herein, %a–_h such Project eahrell be made to ccnfcrs yith all the than applicable Development Code provisions. If % he Cenios Project or office j Project does not obtain a certificate Of Occupancy for the 1 ent3 -eety at such project within these � � yfsrs of the effect v� data of thia Agreement, otitis Rgreeaaa;n_ asp' -, :ff a is such Prajact which has not reaceivsd such Certifica _,, accupancy, '1 stsali be deemed to, be terminated automatican ly. 7 • AMILK and rasidenta of a �t�. Ail tf 4nta, oc:clapants, p�:rtmtnt unit, in the 5ercio� 'Project shall bft Qualified fienantu< aaici ,aPart4*M' t ?nits s2>a1I net ec ranted, aacup ;,aid, leased or subleased to oc ,upants who arse not ,,�alifssd To N' sxCept as provided' as follows.. a- A person ar person xho is not a Qualified Tenant, attach is at least tarty -£ivs {45) years of ,ago, t ^y o«:rup}r an apart>Iaenl: unit if fie or she occupies an alMrtmant unit. with a present oc.'°upaent wh. is a qualified Tenatnt and jhO provides primary physical or sconaaaic support to;plGh 4 �ifisd Tenants b, as ] �-'XO mat least fotrtY-l.LV* (45) yearns of age who is the Spouse of a Qualified Tommt say occupy Z unit with suczt Qualified Tenant; and c, A person or persons tender fifty- five_ (Zd) years of algae say occupy aepartmant units as temporary tenants for a. poriod or time rant to exceed thr+eee, {3} months daring any calendar yeaer. n' B91Q . DUrinq the Qualified Project Period saevr"ty -five paa =sett (73%) of the v. Ki ra in the 'r Pro Ict shall be ranted, leased or half aavaailak+la . f' vita Income f Qualified Tenants at aefford*11*10 rents, 40 dcfitted a ra>in,� Additionally, at least sixty (6t?) days pr ft to any - nc>reas* in rental rates, as computed by the tern: of this Agreement, gourse shall provide taritt4r,, no::Wcr affected tenants. , of attcSuch increase o the City and all ll it C. M,sint-- a-mWA 5th &ar&x*AU a& Rtad"• During -the term 1 hereof, all apartment units in the Senior Project shall remain rental units. lq.anpartaent unit in the Senior Project shaall be townhals for cany rsion froz rental units to condominiums, townhouses or any other common ,interest subdivision without consent of the City council. D. qJLtLttJk Baer. A full -time >Panager snall be provided on the Senior Project. 1 E. 'Ce. mmiCteP Residents shall havar thae right to - I establish a committee composed of tenants for the purports of organizing social activities and providing con ,monts aai4 suggestions regardir_j the operation and fac rlities of Jye Scets cxr Project. Nothing in this section <` -4hail be deemed to ree,!trict the rights of individuals to organize activities and grovida \,,commonti , on the Senior Pro act operation. P_ubmias�o'�Iaterial�V occu aac AiLY11i" R2111s. Pria to Y : Ndursie shall submit tQ City t4nant 'Sale.ction G Pncceduri "Aich shall detail the methods which �tagttrsae shas� 1 use. to ad�sertisa? t1�e' $vailab*' 4ty of apartments in tl:e SOniot Project o q and screenirW,,;?mechrnis xa whici' MOursre intends to ruse to limit the occupancy of thft SPa,rtseeants to Qualified Teat*Ats tend Low Income Gualitied Tenants. an or Afore xatr4� '15"' .hf eac' S year tollOW431% tthe cox ,ncoment of �.be Qtaaliti �d i►r eet "i9er+ tad reprerers4cwiwae, stall file a certif3 tote of OI nuinq or COMPliance Mth the City. Each such report shall contain such infomati.on aaa vity v requ re including, but rat liWitmd to, th* following: as<. Rest seriulee Then effact, includiv, utility ct��tsgs� fi.f �,►�t) � 8. A project o0 4� ncy g` Mile, inclvidi4ng '49e, resident profile aW s'_r of elutoex►biles owX#d by project . residents; C. A�ldescriptian of aX3 written coseplaeintsa r iivwd rxa I d. lication ,hat lost ' nc zoq;4irostients h*v,% '44 n I mot; list-Of Substantial ftysical defeat* fsn the project Encluclk�g a descriptic�ril of repair or naintransnce work Undertakanna,- duri�ig: hex ri)port:.rq .yoas�a and f. k 46scription of the physical \ e andit:ien and Sao ta,t nce prccedsru;s for the Project, includir4 %�partm+ant unitxc, landsoaping, walkways and re�oreetiona %reap.. '- City shall set Allowed to conduct physical inspections of the Senior Project &Z it shall deem nc=sssary, provided that said inspections do not "MUsonably interfere with the normal, operations of the senior o Proiuct f >idreason reasonable notice is sQ z f , conduct � snmal ury :yot resident i the Senior praict in to rdrtsoniur roedo. sssc s 1 Cv. TAridnt afiallstjQ , Colitt3"aCter } or receipt of an. appflicastijn for low, � 041 �ta,�, � g„ shat? l det;armino the eligf.iility ref tlhe tics ipaa+��= ' >apsder the ��s Ot phis C+gvologsnent A reement. VAa r tiic*iion of tenant eligibility shall includes .w•ne or ns Nre, of the following tact9rs ecurxt inCors . �. ��otsta3n an i.s4co g v>erifaatizsh f�rrm from tYs6 Social. , J Nation arid/or t'x�ee ca►i ifoinnin ?� aartment qP Social SerVIcas, if thm ,ilplicantl` motives inCOrte frosa eit6dr -o W both atgerzcieso (/ P yy�. , V �a 'e.acl.i� �! iii �.r i �t`- r b. Obtain an incowe tax return for the most xacezi tax year; Cl Conduct a TRW of similar financial search; d. Obtain am inco m for fication from all cu=en employers; and s. If the appli-oant is unemaloyod %nd has tte, tax return, obtain another form of independent verification'# Nourse shall be entitled to, rely on the inror"ti agreements eifalioor rental ,all aRp&rtnient units iA�the S Wj;, Project shall be in watt . h The form of proposed neat or lea$ee agre"ent i reviewed and approved by Cfty prior to the c 6dGMMt Qualified. PV*Jgc:t Per cmi. Such agr#0WnE sM1l im, u&a and regulations governing tans within the 34mior- ;, E ` rules .and regulatio -na shall inc"* rOW41 <tions irhiclt specifically autnorlke tiara keeping of small tats within apartment units. H. Zereeireat. m as ri ftnaTLts. A tenpz,l terz- .nated, without the +0rMinat4on facing deemed, an ev3ci the t011owing circumsta)MC:* ; a. The dvat t of the sole tOpant of tj unf,t3 b. BY the tenant at the #rtion of the tern 09. occupancy or otherwise aeon thirty (le) days; writf n notict; C. By abandoment of the pranines cyt the tea, d. �i 8y failure of a tenant to execute or renew a ; anf,tsrminatiom of a tenancy other than +,those listi in ttAs paragraph 1.4 shall cnnst:tuta un ev-, A t3on. ��y shall box" in comp iarico wi'tY< the provisions of California then a4:1y for mate icl noncompliance a:nce with the to za rif 1 agreere, ,t. t• &ble Re y - h sid�c• i .sidonay preferenc sha 1 her possible appliQanes, tto `tha See6tor P o3ca t., who l residents of the City of Ranchm cucamo Aga►, However, th, shall not be,�givan grtority dver,,th a other elements at I Tenant ,s }�lectiom' as stated herein. n - i 0701 -0 4-13-88 PC Acienda 3 of 6 IQ . '71 1 �nsusauo Th" SOnlOr Project' ar all g . rove"nts thereaon +shall bO thoured at all tilms againat loss or damage by fire Or ,Daher ris4 acvQred by as standard extended coverage ondorsement `ar4 such other ricks, perils or Cava ••_ ".q+t as. shall e i sure determine. Duria�{ _,,,the ho, the senior orojecr shall be insured-to ,its t"I naurance replaceenseaat value. Hourse shall aomplls 'With all city Saint ad, f time to tip. i,. _�tandn��rclas 89lmti�y��san �� eft �►�a�?.�� 5th � 88.1 �9 X' The following 8peeitic restrictions !pp�hall Agreement: he senior 8i %e pursuant to,,this oevilopaont pply to tribes use. of t a• C -11Y residential uses of t.ha` real laroperty shall be permitted in the Senior Project; b. Tea nasix" density of res1lential das41,tinq units in the Senior P'rajeoa*t shall never be �, e gras��r than 35�gh dwelling unt:. ; Var, acre; C. The maxi 'Iml ght for the highest proposed buildIng in the Se Project ast al,l bass fifty -fives (55) feet: c!. The ataximu for all, the brzibdbigs undl the proposed square foo «„ r each 4Dt the upartmsnt t }•Pas located in the 5enat r Fro pect shall be as sat forth in Exhibit „l "0 attached haret4; and Q. The prGvisionss for reussrvation os dedication of land for public purpcsOes are contained in the conditions for approval of Developaent Review 87-13. M. divsl�, u�esxst �yisRI13l . The City �ti11 s�rarat Nourse file Project.- dlaveYz�pterxnt irecentivi� for dasvelcpstcent of the .Senior Prajact: a• The maximum density per acre on the site Shall bw increased to ,35,05 dwelling units per acrai b. 'the mastiMUM nmember of rAquired off - street parking spaacnes shall be lowered to one (1) parking spmae parer dwelling Unit; ',,7d c• City* riquirements for Cov°er+ed parking spaced shall be waiv,i,4 in their entirety. � � s_i+sn i nib saw QWZM, The Seenior Project OPT A 304r:re, buildings an individur.l apa.rtmtnts r� - r,. f ahall be *siVn*d with physical a mnities caioerinq to the newts f $nd desire, of the senior citiz` those conditions set foarta�� to E� ir]W. idonts• In addition t� I Physical amenities shall use subsj�s�� ZY�► ine3udiadtin �helawineg f FrojGjt: - f a. ?•.levatcr >aervice shall be r provided to all u story aPartments Ppur a<to f Y,. All units shall ` bs da,signod for handicap acc*ng,— C. All units sbali/ P088e.03 0scured OntzW&Yo off a cocoon enclosed hallvi j ` d. Handtraiia shall he f grl*4ded in all haalvoys; { !. e. Building *Pace shall bQ..: devoted for tenant qr+ meetings; and f. Recreational ;�jenitiea6 C limited to, Pstttinq sha11 include, but not gx -lVens and shuffleboard courts. ®. ROU 92nt . In consiftration for the liaitattions i►:" in Orovidedt, City agrees tPsat'. it shall not, during of This Agraemsnt, tat�ar any io>�n, the effact�af whi hill a tt) contra! i, determine or a! f f the eats for those low income rental ::nits loCa;ted i;s the project.' Enict e. Standards BFI t2 th b®v. aI1 W' apply to fit. R'he f�*llo�rin apply to the uss of istza,ffice wing \IP*cific restrictions shall Ac •eement: Pursuant to thit� Development a. All units within the Office Project shall be designed to accommodate medical ,Office users). uses within the Office project shall ba davi lopad inther conformance with those "office P,�cfossiovala uses as ` defined in Bastion 17.10.030 of G!'it } Devpment Code, as the same is "s 's *lc elo amended from time 'to saD b* The m8xin +.lag density, height, site and proposed total square Lootage for that buildfings on the Site, tonathor office pay °liniCfnlb for the reserv8tizn or dcdicwtiesl of land fev LA is Purptses, are contained in the c0nditiOns for approv of the Site in that site Plan attaches heratO as Rxhil4iz "DIl. 9. Dav*l ipment Aireement for th D int, tsiriasl annually We �y FF�yL p� y iisubia tieE«{t��4,.)� �jZit�4lbi. f'4��d q�ilY*� •. . y, Yi�� c i�nnGB _iii.tt4e termB of'this tpeve:'apment agreesent. west End shall 911 * :an annual .:report with the City indicating infQ=ation raga, -..':,ng compliance with the terms of this Devslopa®nt A,3rg4mo t than March is of each calendar year. a.;1a+ter 10 g Este -- mow -^s.� � •�ti$ 1? t11tt• Nest End hereby agrees to grant:seassmsnts across the oft: .a Site for amergamy secondary access and drainage as reflected in these Site plans attached hereto as Exhibits "C" and "Dw. 11. velostssn The Senior ftojesct and office Project may be developed in one or acre Phase* of construction; provided, that the Senior Project is deval aped concurrently, or prior to, granted office Project. U til a certificate of occupancy is ranted for the Senior Project, no certificate of Occupancy shall be granted for any use in the , office. Project. hold elect o Source and Next a hold City and its ed �sfficalsd officers aagents eto and shall eaaployees haralmtimm from liability for damage: or aims damage damage s z'ie :' including death, alTi4. - claeiuk for property g trisoe Excise, the direct or indir+e�t operations of such $arsty or t2a, as of his {{contractor, subcontractor, agent, employa•e or other perso ac,, ng on his behalf which relate to the re�apdetive Project. Soura ;t and waist End agree to and shall defend City an4 its elected,!offcials, gffirarsr agents and employees wits; v*spsct tts a �tions for damages caused o? alleged to have bean caused by reason of such partias,,4ictiivities in connection with this respective Pro sect provision applies to all damages anti. clam�t'orodamage suffered or alleged to have baest swAfferod by reason of the operations referred to in this Devmlopaaent Agreeaent regardless of whither or not the City prepared, supplied or approved tho plans, sPscifications or other !docuaenta. 13. . Thic :Agreement may bd anended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties aAd then in the spanner Provided for in California az Sections 53968 at seq. Overnment code 14. of this En±'e�rcams =. In the event Of a default under the provisions j Agr sum=. City shall defaialting part give mitten notice to the Project, and by registe! reduor�certifiedt mail d�addra�ssed�ito the address stated in this .4gteemsnt, and if such violatirn is not corrected to the rtaso►iable satisfaction of pity within thinty (30) ray after such notice ie given, or if not corrected within, such It if ;�.�sd time a3 may be required to Curd the breach .or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within t:hii'Ey (30) da a Y (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must: ', 1 be COU2enr ed within said thin diligently PUrSU*d by the defaulting days and meat be City uAtter without furtter notice, declare a d fau t unde this Agreement and, upon arty° such declaration of :.def&ult, City May bring. any action nwg2sxary to slsacificaliy vntorce the obligat°inns defaultiriq of tt�a pgrty q rcwing, out of the operation at thjs' Dave3.sypmaar.t Agreaaant, agply to any couae:tc, state or foderal; fq-_- {�:�unaative relief agaeinc� any violation by Deve1pper` of azly rjeavision eat tht,,W Agrecwont, or apply for coach otheear relief as, may be appropriate, J , Is � It . Yours>Ee or West . ' `a1 in default under this lagrc ement upon thsa happening of one or rt,.rraa of the ieylloi<rine� events or conditions: a6 xf a Material warranty, rep;esaantat -t6h or atat r, *, in aa4de or furbished tea City and 10 falsase or prazved to have tGOn false in any ma"rial, respect vier► it was made; b• if a finding And Aatetnirsatti4r3 is made by pity < following an annti i1 review on the basis of asubaa:tasn- tial evldcnce ,'that r Kcurs8 og West End bane not complied in goad« faith with nag* saatgoeIAZ terms ` conditiors h cZT� gengnt, After notice aan'A Opportunity to cure as de$scriT>atd in hereinabovo; a parase�aph s4 C. A breach by Nc% rseL..ar Rest End of any of the provi- sioni or tsrms of this Agreeataa nt, after notice and Opportunity tea Cure an provided in paragraph 14 hereinabove, 1e5' si� UAMd$e. City down not Waive any claim 0f defeat in periormasscs if can periodic review City does i not enforce or terminate fhi,s Agreement. Ptonpaartorsaana�a3 steal# uncross be ,'eat excut+ed able, nce of the Qbligations herein contained would be unpraf3 table, difficult Or expensive or "cause of a tailurt of any third party or entity, other than City. .a:11 other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise PAll th for a this Agreement or in City +sa regulations eyovemrning dove:opmeor agreements are available to glee parties try puasu* in the event th there is a breach of that 04VO.opment Agree!eliaent, No waiver Spy pity of ashy breach default or under this Development Agreeemeht shAll be deemed to be a waiver of any othIr subsequent breach thereof or' default hereundear. R'a'Z. eit P Under this Aageemen�, Should Nonuse or Waist Snd place i or cause to be placed any encumbrance or lien an the Projzct, or any part thereof, the beneficiary "Lender ") ( at 12 ANIL said encumbrance or lion, includin g mortgages, Shall, have th5a right aetany any during the term of this A9rseeaaao,nt and the exiStgnce of said ancualtbranca or lion to.- a. Drs any act or thii%q V6quired us:dear this A4riomsnt, and any such act Or thing dons, or performed by Lender Shall be as effective aet if done by the def,,ulti�$ Party its,eli'; b• haralize on the eracurity, a rfordud by the � ncumbrancee or l;ioai by oxe .x�eing forecic surs Proceedinejs or power e Baler or other V y" *f3'olddgd LA .law or ;lay equity or icy thee s *;''ity 4*0W sent evideeft *ice -that eAC' =brarice or Xisn (htreivafter rsjerrj4 toss nth* t�kii 4ead -1) C. Transfer, cobvey or agii!n thS tide 'of 'Btourss or Vast ]end t6 the respeetiVa ProJe� to any purchaser at any forocl Swart scale,, wh% ho r the foreciorr�sra sn "le tr'� be conducted pursuant to -Gurt -order or psur cyst td' 4 POwOr of sale conti►insd in a trust ,doodl and d• Acquire ana *ucessd i.o !theR interest by Virtue` opt any foroclosure s p y whe %Gr the rorercleasuree sale be eonducterd guy :a3afnt to a court order 'hr rnrsuart to a power of Salle contained In A truest deg :d. de e faul H1 t t� r* �f, City Shall! give written notice of any or broatch undeler this Agroo *nt by grOWL'tY owner to Lender and afford Lender th% opportunity after service of the notice toe a• Cure the breach or default w +thin Sixty (60) nave after sezvi,cs of said notice:, where the default can be cured by the payment of money; b• Cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days Afterr Service of said notice where the breach or daafaal.t can be cured by something other than the Payment of money and can be cured within that time; or C. Cure the broach or default in such reasonable titer as may be required where something other than Payment of msaatay is required to cure the broach or defaau,lt and cannot be performed within sixty (60) days wafter said notice, Provided that acts to cure the breach or dsfesult are commenced within a sixty (60) day period aftenr;,sprvice of said notice of dafau.lt on Lender by City and are thereafter diligently continue d by Lender, 13 beac r taus proceadingo tC4, C ings so cosmenal order of court o PoVer of, aalet q endunbrenca Or forestall any sul unless: J(, doz.,,, Notwithstanding any Other provision at Lepder say toreotall any aot3ol#:by City fos a wi1e� a terams o f thit ht by commencing ecs3o' its ancusbraen * Or li0n., The Proceed - for rczrscioasure Of UVA 004mibrance by toy Voroel"Urs Of the 40MAbraincs► urA*r a , seined, in b* Instnwwent croatinq the a. Vitae gioceadings shall c)t.# however, aretiot� by than City for U40 dlsfaultt • or breach ss w-my are,, cOMel4s*4 within *Ixty too) <1eeyo ,after ca on L n*�,r Or 'the i ds gybed ab�� hea'ein� u. ! n b' 10 �. y Ij*vjn, ;oon � diligtli e: PUd Lead in the s" or r*gjXj;r= b"t tx couple I at�i e. L+sAder I keeps and po7tf irw all at the torsi o Crenatse and Opndjt'Qxese s3' thisreeaernt'r fGhQ ern$ . or expera, inure 4"Lt �saP�tyr �' gevel,O�iri poi" until i�OreOlO,u�xras �rOCeeCltr arw ca�xlete are discharged joy redt,. pticn, sati,sgactisrnor � •i �R ^�ri�.` rt this �� ' e�rey notiNe raeg. od to ice' iv*n key the tuz* ; of shall be prOVi led ty ='�certi.fiac �reeae,ent ;,seal, rat s raceip. rec sut�td, at the ?Andress of Atha re sot a P� _pies as gPe -' ti epd bail,. or at any other Such at3dx:aas as say 'bc� l ,tat, sgreoigicd b! -- use parties hereto. To Nourse: Wourse DevolOpRe" Co. 9631 „Doves: Drive, s,aita 116 M**'PO t Beach, Cal:t?,Mmia "921563 Attention: Pater W. Upurss r TO Vest End: West End Invest s ents t 334 N. �clid Avenue 1 1 ontarjo,_ CaYifornia 91762 c Attention: Robert Dutt=, Qoneraj Partner eor AN fff I.._.:.:C._.. _ ._.... .. ! 1 3 �y �r r-a� ' � I l Vo city :, city of xancho Cuda�sangec, 9320 Bass .G, no, write C P.O. Box. 80 Rancho cucavomgk,�, Cozi;Carnift 9,19;730 i Affixation: tat =se -man, � 21- �tt�...arn :va ire any- procaa�iafrt�s s�i�a enforcement of this gDaVelopsent ' fromt the j al3.+eged breach or defa►u t Ixereuxe er' A tre b*O Q**a of an be entitled to reCOYrY its �.oas'h.s and its re►as sottsab aat��s r � Eras incurred dluririg the proeessding as may be fixed within tier discretion of the cOUrt. Thies t and burdeansF hereof shrill iri==*. ta, the reapeaa and benefits and heir 1 Dar"ti i* hereto legal s spratsesritaRti;�tess, executors, a+tinistrators, successors and assi, ns, Wherever then conte Xt jraas or ao" its 23. lka�ris ca2zle This AgreaUEnmt sh*Z1 be 00' :ax=ed in aceardanoas Stith and g0vernod by the laws of ° tha Stats of Calita ni,a. y qP 24. if any pravk# ions of this Agrees :than ty deemed to invalid, illegal or aznonforesabl� the val3dSty, legal3t ; or enforceability of "the reining provisions hereof shah, not in asny teag: br affected or inpaii4d thereby. 25. Reccrdatian. This Acj'rea�sesnt shall, it the *xpense Of DOvelaaer'� , bercorded in the "btf'ici&I Records of ,ttje Counter Recorder Of the County of . San BOVAardino:, IN WITNESS MRZOF, thisa rase nt has boon executed by the �Saheit t' and shs— i bt *ff� ctiV4 on the affective: date set forth hare.Snaabovo. , CITT OF *CRD CS7CA�IONCh Gated: By Damn s �.o�t a Mayor dba NOM Dated;, � , i (3 -- - IF / NESS` ]IND 6 Tu Partnrsra�ffip 1� Dateri:`� i a k CCUNIT Ofi SAN a=WARDXNO as. Notary n 1986w before aye, t5e �sndere�ie,�csE, a r c a. or maid Cogpty au�i $tat*, p*:rsonally natisred gr� od to iae,on tta�s basis of aav �hoo"`-"to` �af�i fide p 0wan a�ceeut+ixi tl�I6 - instruaent inlgtXUactory as itayor, of +� Cl Ct� �Wi, , a municipal corporation Ovi sti and a Aniataci 2aEws` of the r5tat� t+i' - California, and acjno�rledced to ne tksat.: the "CZTii tia liAKCNO ,. CUCAMONGA sxacuted it. C ?�Y' pesbT c" n an4d feF sac d State` STATE or COUNTY or } ss On 1988, before me, the undera�ig7ted, a Notary � c in tmA tar ssDd County and State, personae y appeared peter W. Nouraa, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who axecuted this Lastrument as dale proprietor and O"er of xoURSV DXVZL MNT do. �Auta �d c �'cknowlsdl;gd to e that thAt $uoh parson is authorized an behalf Of such ta, Notary Public in and fort skid State A RESOLUTI& O? THE i�'UCAMONGA %ANNIN6 CdWISSION RECAMNEWING APPROVAL WA REQMST TO :lMEDiD THE LAND USE MAP OF " TFNr x R�l4, PLAN, ;GPA 1 -046, FROM LQW -MIjM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWLIWJ UNIl PER ACRE) TO,- HIGH RESIDENTIAL (24-30 .LIN UNITS PER ) FOR 1l IDR � HOUSIM Pico= ON 5.06 ACI%S OF LAND LOCATED Ott Ttit SOUTH SIDE OF BASE. , LINE RWO, WEST OF ARCHTt9ALD AYEitIDE, RANCHO CUB, CALIFORNIA, AND MARE FINDIH6S' '•S�- ►PPtIRT THEkEOF A. Recitals. (11 N`aurst 001opmeat has filed an application for Genea� 1 Plan team roa►nt 8T- -046 as des d6sd in tM title of this ttesc� ution. lisratinaftaar in thin, Resolution, the bject General PlIft Amendex * i0n- red to as The Application."' (1f) On, April ii, IM. the planning caaaa�att� ion of the city of Rancho Cuc+eeonga eriduc a +duly notic+ad p�lf� and concluded saI'tl hRalriag on that 'ring as the Application gal 'Prerequisites," occurred. 44 option of this Usol6tion have f� B. Rssoolution, ! NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detemintd,;,�nd resolved by the I Planning COMMis5to9 of the City of Rancho CuGar�onga a# foTlaxs; C. set forth Zin the Rec Uls Par Ahereby Or i Resolution are that all Of rue and Torre fats ect. f. '' -1 2. Rimed upon Substanttiali avidairs*e pt °z this v xnis5ioh during the °gpOv2- :referenced public ht!ar q * +r t+ written and oral staff deports ' #�` ' ''oriI , 'test% including CO ission' hereby spoef �� liy fIW , �3 f� "11r, p' ' ,' this basically fat) The ��Pplication a'Oliars .ti# � r.� r5� ptreel Of ?and y d ulo;� in cda�figuration, It at2 an sRsi�� °id of Hass tine GRoad, west of Ar�hiCsald A?+ nue. Said property is "EF rrent•t r - acted .as ;;low- e-i ra Resid an 1 (4 -8 ciwtilfirg unfits per acrt) on a Map f the Ga feral Plan and �t,s caarently devaaloped with an olderp l fly, reside ace ., With v;ie ree3inder of the site vacant land with a -�;-dn tr On of trees adiace"t to Base Q zo Road, and Ji ' S'tAy1i �R�wSt3t}i11 £ No 1 designated tb! "the,, Property° to tree north of the subject site 13 �i arhood Coswretal on tk4 band U$s trap of Raeneral yep aid consists ref a narfghbwohood coeteercial sbcw. -ping canter, the y south of t.`,e subject site is designated Low Residtntiai he Property file Per wow t than n le ap y the geflera� Plan and consists of vacant land and tow Jensfty single fawiiiy rresidstttia the py to the elkst is designatrtd efghbr;rhooa6 Caw trcia`I opt the US# consists of a nrifghborhaoc, cow"rcial s t� Of the arul Plar and west is 4"igr�ated tour Residential t2-•4 i!°ticng cant P * �° the Use I4ap of 'the Banes, Flan and consists of low defer per " l e Ii1 rasi�dantiai; and ,. (c) The Application requests the �t of fire Sand {fsa� � of she General ,F1aei fra�at taw -idiwt Ctesidential4 -l; dwells .unit; pe +" acre to Nigh Rasiderntfal (;4�.3Q dwelling units Per Merat) for t! 3".05 tit re lkarc l Q and Element oft x rye is a rl be l ` in :#,arrt wit the la nd Use adverse i cts U perxms and �tially x tifiunt subject- site, and would bi in the tort is of theft* "c'�s! yl- the welfare of the citfuns of the City of Rattct�n Ct aroar health. a 3. Based upon thy! substantial evidence pre1e:4t0d to this Comission during the- abCWe..referenc*d paolic b"risrg and t the specific findings of fact set Earth in psragraplas 1 and 3 at+ova, this COMission hereby finds and concludes that the application would be consistent With the objectives o the Land IIS! anri Hostsirast "E1e+eents -, etf the Gr4Ytera1 'Flan, would be in they est interests a >f the City of RanChio C'^ a, and s�rould protect the heaii, safety: and Welfare- of the citjzens oluatcsnga, California. 4. In ciinjunction with That Application,, an Initial cStudy! Preliminary Environmental Assc- se"-vent, In conformity with the regu €reawentt with the California „Environwtal Quality Act,, has been:! prepared, The Csrr�ission has det"'ned that thfs Urejact would not have a Significant adverse effect on the enviro�tnt, and hereby rlcoMnds the finding of no significar►t infect ? and;tha issuanct of a negative Ceclaa~ation by the City Coungri.. . ,Rased upon t the findings and ccmcluSions Set forth in paragrap�,s p fc ion 3 oboes, this C iSSion hereb axppticatic+e erne directs iiratt a certified c i eGaereends approval of The material be forwarded to the City Council for this Reso ,deterarfna io and related o The ldlut y Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of thr's Hasdtutfon. i i PLANK ;�O� L%UrtTiaIG ON No. AERlL F'"T April ,I r � Page, 3i i - ��q �,�q.�. is�� pp}}�/ ��p� [� a�y�p. �1�y. y.� ygDfx. _ y r_- APP�1{M Y�IC f�Hy/"IG7�+ lHJS d5Ya�7. PAY til" f,M',Ri4�, 1 .. RMININg C"ISM9 OF TW crn OF airy � ... a rear A MST i L,, Brad Sullor, Rancho Cut $Y S Cary Olt thrt rits�tnis issfon of the riiy Of", ragul4riy ire � ed i 4y .Fartify that th# f*14W r-4 ftsolution gives duly and Catty of PA"Cho Cut ' ,'fps ,, and adb ►taxi by that i► iQal isslon of Ut on,,tha 13th day of� y 2 y chit OW iroll of the Manning r�rfssion klid n9 Vote —to *f t. Ai'�S CII�F'�Sx ,A NOES: t"IsSIomRS: ABSE T: COWISSIONERS: U i - - -ll o ��s A RESOLUTION OF THE rtAwkp CUCAVAKA Rl. "Im Ct1wrAx tj � RECOFNDLti6 APPROVAL -� A REw'llT T+1 Tip --DDA 1? DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Nom, t�.a FRW LOW -p Tkn C RESFDENTrAi. i4-8 DiILL14 UNIT; 'PER MAI TO !ilGi RESIDENTIAL (2444 DMLING UKITS ! ,QE) _ ATTACHED WlTtt. ' SENIOR MUSING OVULAY DISTRICT (SO) FOR `A S.OS ,. ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON Tfi SOUTH SIDE ,BASE l:19F ROAD WEST OF ANCHIFAW- AVENUE,-i RANCHO CUC ,CALK tNhA', '. AND MAKE FIND,lir6S' SfiPPORT THiREOF ., • Rec #tats.. 'went has filed are - application for Sener'aT plan Amendment 87 -00 as described in the title of this Ras�Tution, 1ilreinaftsr in this Resolution# the. subJtct General Plan: Avend�t to r�efarred to as "3h'a Application., i (it) On April 13 1 that pl Rancho Cuc ° Cdss# :±f the i�it�r of aawnga conducted a tduT,Y noticed hearing on The Application r andconcTuded said hearing-o that: date. �`�% " (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of_this Resolution hive occurred. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolver, by the Planning Coatnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows;. 1. This Coemissia:ar hereb,Y *pacifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitatls# Part A, Of this Resolution arc true and correct. 2. used upon substantifxi evidence resented { during the above referenced p o ttiis�J Conmifisian written and oral staff repo�ts,ict getharg on April 13, 1588, including C*missiorr het'eby spect3calTlr findt'ws follows. public LestimOnY this faf The Application applies to a 5.05, sere parcel of Lard basically rectangular in configuration, located an the s,;pth side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue. Said ;aroperty is Currently designated as Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling uniti,+ Per acre) Warr the Devel Map and is currently developed with alf olden single fastily resi st District remainder o the site vacant land with a concentration of trees adjacent to Bash Line Road; and V 9 I F r isvp ,;,ANNI;4 COWISSiON`'RESOLUTTGN Rv. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -05 Ap ' 1 13, I988 PaO 2 - W The property to the north of the subject site is designated Neighborhood, Commercial on the Doelopment District Mnp and consists of a' neighborhO d ;Oi msrciat shopping center, the property to the south of Vie subject site i designated LOW Re.iaential (2 -4 dwelling nits per acre) W, the Development District M®p � cons sts of vaGant,landnand low density single family residential, the property � the eas` is designated Neighborhood Commeroial on the tkvelopN*nt District Map and consists of a neighborhood commercial shop�ing cenftr, and the property to the x2s°t is designated Low Resideitiacl t2.4 dwelling units per acre) on the DeV#lopmant District Map and °consists of 'boa derlttty single family vesidential; and (c) The lbap'icatiart is the AmendmMrrt :of the.xtlopwment Di -trict Map frw1s-,� ium. Restdiotia (" dw0lin units per &dime) tai High Residential (24- 30, units , acre) attathed kith the Sen Housing ior overlay District (S") for th",Oacre „patrcel and , {dD Thy APPlic4ti_- would be consistent with thin Land Use Element of the General. -Plan, wouW� t:lt result in Potentially significant adverse impacts to persons aard Pr*irty JA the immediate vicinity of the subject site, would be in the-'rast r interest3 of the Health, satiety and welfare of the citizens , of 'the City of Rincho CucWonga, and is consistent with the necessary precorditions required by Section 17.20.0400 of thiAlk Developwnt Cods as Prer+equisitet that eruct be prssent for` the. site to be considered forma senior housing project.. _ 3, Based upon fine substantial ,Ividonce presented to this Commission during the above- referencest 'ii p c hearing and upon the specif r, findings of fact set forth in paragraphs and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes that the application mould be cassilterlt with the ab$ectives of the Land Use and Housing Elae#ents _of the Ofterpl Plan, would bo- in the best interests of the City of Ranch Cucaaanga, and would protect the htalth safety, and welfare of t.h citizens of Rancho Cucamongs, California. 4• In conyunction with The Application, an Initial Study/ Preliminary Environmental Assessment, in Conformity with the requirements with i the California Envivonmental Quality Act, has be::41 prepared. The Commission> has detervined that this PMJ0Ct NOuld not have -a significant adverse effect on the environ alt, and hereby rec mmnds the finding of x�o significant 'imp0 and the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. J 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recomponds` approval of The Applicat-ii:n and directs that ,a certified copy of this Resolution 40 related material be forwarded to the City Council for final determination, 6. the Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall 'certify to the adoption of this Resolution. II&ii1Ci10 Cttc a . " ' erg kr�+ of lanni Ctaa 3� Qp0 @ tlt� {`r sga, do haroy ca. -t#fy that. fart # Of mqu7ar'iy- iatm4uc4 --d 1, MISO. and a � UsolUt #an was duly"In:d ' City of Rancho Cuc , at a ' ad , )1n" in9 I'00i3slon Sgt the ate. �r amt #nn� a ICarnst #e19 4s #c+n hd1d c"), on the 83 t dAy df ,' I9", try talti rd v� #.o wjt.t AYES. Aak a48S,k`NlT: GOMMISSIONiiwRS. Ai A f i PLANNING POMHISSIO *: MOLUTWNt)�. ©UELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENOmENT 87.05 c 1968; a Apprai3l$, 1 PROM AND AWPTEV THIS 13TH v,'.v OF APRIL, 3966. <<, f PLANNING, COMMISSION ' T'k cirf OF �tl4ti�'}NO C CUC � ti. i ..Bra Miller, pu -- ry - I, Brad Sul le - RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUrrOK OF THE PLANNI C0M'ISSION OF THE CITY 1'F RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMEND N6 APPHCVAL OF THAT DOCW?,N ENTITLED "DEVELO6 L+; AGREEMENT mo. $1 -02',i SENIOR CITIZEN" HOUSING' CONCERNIN& THAT PRePERTY LOCAl1ID SOUS`; OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF ARPHIBALD. AVErZ; fir IN lliE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. Recitals. ti) California Gover[ wt U)de Section 65M now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature -rinds and declAres that:., "ta) i'he ,fack of carts-ini in the �Pprovat of development projacts can result in a waste of resources, escalate the Cost Of housing and other "' deve�OPWts to the cIMMOr, and discourage investment in ano comitment to com'"bonsive pl.enning which would make MAXIMUM efficient utilization of tasources at 0i least ece4iaaic cast to the public. "(b) Assurance to toe app�;Cant for a develop"nt.. project that Upon approval of the project, the; applicant. may , Proceed with the project in accordance with existing �ticies rules and regulation2, and subject =to condt(tie% -of approval, will strengthen the Public planning process, encourage private participation in Comprehensive planning, and reduce the ecoamc Costs of development." California rOvernprent Code °action 65565 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Any city ,- May enter into a development. agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in rear property for the development of such property as provided in this article... (ill) California avernr�ent Cod: ecti.n 6586'5,2 provides as follows: "A development agreement shall specify the duration oaf the agreement, the perinitted uses of the property, the 'density 0•r intensity Of USUF the maximum heiSht mnd, size of proposed building;, and provision for reservation d, .adication of land ; for public purposes. The development ag�iement mar, include J conditions, terms, restrictions , and regYiremehts f6r�� subsequent discretionary act'ons provided •hat such` conditions, terms, : " s�i,f;tvbns ' and rkq�sirementsf,- 'for r- �_ subsequent discretionary �r ohs shall not prevent development J Pl.�ar� STAFF �a. ct��sst� s�� r RE: OA 87-04 April i3, xgi3S Page `1\-Of t�s land for the efe< and to the density or intensity of apmert sat forth. in the a 9raftrtt , .. , ,'fva Caiifo r #a %varnra m Corte Sactios IS5SIS provides that a �f #,y ax+Y. by a9rtee�aaca� �dith � d &tai the maxim densit,�r established grant t9aaeaity, bonus over that alit'rM by of the ttera! Plfeh when a +itval . ar a MS t4 JCGftSttrdtct Mou►sit a P iet+aent income $0.nior households, -- 9 9 `t .r low to ittcorporatod hetrefat Ottkod as Fxhibit *Is and co"Cornia that tiffs eofa� *fte, i$ a Prww oevolopw.t Afire event 9 Arope�r40oca't" rally sduth of Baxo Lino tt$a4 and West of Archibald avenue, i , ths^'#;itlr , f r^ha , the tttach" 0 %e'=opet flaw ms' Thai < oribed in t. kreffi f er in this Rosuiutil" that agr�etaxnt att ached h ere a� Ext:�bi t "�` ft sMafar : to as Atha Uvel ap"Ot Rgreeraent." M) Co;mctt , lkvelop�ttt Agr i �ait)t thfs Resolution rscc ndi"I a�", '1l of . �^ Uo Planning ✓ f ton :lSas aairsP '' Rasolut r�a� rec=wndfftg approval for bath the General Platt Classif�c�tiott for after pr erty front Low-�liu% ltasidontial to Higiti Ptosi till ate; tiNr lihe e`t pistrict ofassificatfon 9 ° or- se�h a11' from c, a . L+- 4tedfuat hasi t�iial District td a ltigft Residetatiael pistr ct eith a Senior 00 -ling Overlay. Cuii) On April �, 1980, the Plaringr Coissfc�re o the Rancno Cucamonga held a d4ly noticer �o ic;neergng cQ3sio» tog the -city 0c velapment'Agrement and 00t {0uded said hearfhg 03, that tints. 1; iv M All lsrgal ,prerequisites priar to s�� adoption of, this t Resolution have occurr@. 8. Reno„ lotion NOW, THEREFORE; it hereby �$ ordaine6 b ¢ the City of Rano,* Cu Amopga * faltt�S y the Planning Cam lssf�n of l i L In all r"spects as set forth in Mo Recita11, Part A, of this a i Resolutf"'. i Z, In conju"ctfon with thi'l Agretartent,, ari Initial Study /PrOliilfttaty Envifonr�nt-jl Assessa nt, in conforaaity with the requires' -has with the Caiifgrnfa Envfroalsantal &reRared. The Ca+sa+fission has doterntined the; this pro# Quality, would. rot Waveen finding ant adverse effect on the envfro nt, and -har-tby rtCq nps the finding o? rho signific4nt impact and the i}aanse of ,: ldectafafvo Oec':laratian by the City Councitr '7bis Commission specifically finds "that: (a) 'the locatior3, les.:gn and proposed .uses set forth 3n tn� ear= lopment gre se!xt arq MVatible Frith the cltacracter of existing I tbF" Qesrelop ertt t the viclrlity; PLANRINii' COMMISSION STAFF REPORT �? RE; DA 0-02 April 13t 1998 Page 3 (b) The Uvelopmsnt Asre nt +aii1 produce Internally an environ.mt of stable and desirable charact4r, and not tend to cause any traffic congestion on surrounding or access str"ts. setting-, G) The proposa+id d"alc� ant wlli be moll integrated into its s and (d) The DevaI*Mnt AlTrOakant conforms U1 the General Plan or' the City of Rancho Cucaa►ongs. �. It is expressly fiutnd that the public Wessi.ty, gtn �,l welfare and good zoning practice require the aipM,�Ial of the Deaelo*ent Nree nt. S. It is fur ar found t:h,Witl* 10cm 'in uni. density to 36..OS dxMinq units per acre is to the O'S i�rtt Utsc 01 the pudic health, safety and welfare since the project �s con P1Qtm will -W Wupied by senior kcsuseh*Ms of log income, in confavange with the provisions of Ca3ifornia 1 ma st Code ,iftttaa 6S91,S. 6. This CoiiiisitOrt h0rdbv, r�eeo df ap royal ' f the Development 1' / Agreewnt attached hereto as Exhibit'x 1 , and directs that a certified coot' of this Resolution and wslated storifal be f'4rarded to the City Council for final determination. 7• The Deputy i`Secrgtary to this COMOtssion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTM THIS 13TH OAy "OF APRIL, 19E8. ` PLANNING C TSSIOR OF TiiE CTW OF RAt HO CUC- AiMA,, f : BY: I larry T. WW i'&"Ci arman .._.. ATTEST: 7-Fifflulle QG $� 1G;Ti' ad'y i - f I, Brad ou114Fr, De the, �1, Deputy SrarretaNy of Plapnfing; woasaission of the, City of Rancho CucaMolrga, do herety certify that the foregming Resolution Was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Corot Lion of the C City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular me ting of the Plantsing Ca iissiort an the Iith day of April, 1983, 'by the fo Lowing vote -to -unit: AFES: CWSSIONERS; ROES: CQF1b1ISSIONEAS: ABSENT: CfMMISSIONERSt buildings, and provision • a servtion ors- iedication of land for pWIJ - purposes. The de velo J candititF.►s� terns, restrictions andgN+r �n y incYude subsequent discretionary actions, provided"- ,':th�; such conditions; terms, �restrict,idns and Mega %r irs' for : ate' r ''y , r RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE iLANNIR�IClO C CUCANONG6 RECaENG C ,YTITLEO "aEYELOptewr AGREDtE#iT Na. 87 02A SENIOR`- CITI2EINS° HOUSING AND t�£dICAL OFpl%o PRi?1ECT` C643;ERMING THAT PROPERTY LOCATED SOUP}( #F *jAa LYF� ROB, !i£5T OF ARCHIRALD AVENUE, tii THE CITY: OF R RANCHO , A. Recitals: M California Gavernimnt Coda, Section 6S now provides, i in "Thiv Legislature Yinds and declares that': "(a) The lack of certainty in, the approval of wh€ developnt projects can result in -a ssaste o of resources escalate the cost of hop$i% and other Ovelop�ents to the consumer, and discourage invest ant in a and coffivitwent to cssrprehensive planning which, Would asilta maxiuw 01`1011"t utilization of r resources at the least etwomic cost to tht, public. "(b) A:.surance to the applicant for 'i devel nt project Liaai L ;a tppeovill of the project, the applicant way proceed with file project in accordance with existing policies, a les and regulations, d subject to conditions,.of a approval, Will strengthen the c planning process, encourage private participation in comprehdnsive . .planning, a v i California Government Code Section 65866 provides, i in with aAny city may enter, into a development agreement j j property for p this article. . ." j j follows: California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides a as "A development agreement shall sj",ecif_ the duration of � � density or intensity of use, the Maximum he /' 7\ ;d Size of proposed for r re PLANNING CGtWISSIQM STAFF REPORT RE: DA 87-02A Apr1l 1998 \11 ' l subsegw1mt discretionary actions $'hail not prevent development of the i1find for the uses and to the density or intensity of devaloplient set forth in the.,agrooment.. ." :`iv? California Goverment Code Section 65915 prwvidas that a city nay; by agreement with a developer, grunt a density bonus over that allowed by the WxImW density established in the DevelopMt Code and Land Use €leftnt of the General Plan when a devatloper aMes se to ddierstruct housing for lave irt6me senior households. tvi Attached to this Resalu%ion, Marked as Exhibit "1- and incorPoratod herein by this +referonc ; is n proposed Developnrerrt Agreement concerning that Pr%*7 V located generally south of 9W lift Road and wrest of Archibald evonue, in fins City of Rancho Cuc o and au 1 the attached Uevsl �ogoilY described. in opa�erit Agreereent. Hereinafter fn thl- Resolmtion, that agreement attached hereto as Exhibit !,�1* is referred _lei as " -� il�ralop!�trt Agrea wt." (VI) Concurrtnt with this Resolutt" reccp�endi, approval o� this Development Agnc ,nt, the planning.. CoMicsian hoe adopted , this recarrmending appeal for° &Ith the G*64r t Plan classification for the Progeny fraae L0W4%d#uM iirsidential t6 High ftsidentiol and *-h°_ Dave; gent District- classification for s.ak s;,pe fratat s lour- lAe<!isga Res #sleniiai District to a Hi h Residential uistrict Wth a Senior }lousing Overlay ;�- For the Senior Housing porti" of the project, a. 6ener*al Plan . classificat"d,r from project, Reeiclant_41 to Office for the Adieal office portion of the it proj'eCt< On April 13, 1988, the Planning Come#ssion of r the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed Public hearing concerning the proposed Development Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date. i (v iii) -All legal priee isites Resalut #on have occurred. prier to the adoption of this 8. Resoiut,� ion 1 MM, TOSREFORE, it he y is ordained by the Planning C issiu,r of r' the City of Rancho Cucamonga is follows: 1. In alt respects as set fortih in the Rentals, Part A, of this � Resolution. 2. In conJunction with this Development Agreement, an Initial i StudylPrelinlinary Environmental Assessment, Irr conformity with the requirements with the California Environmental Prepared. The CoMission has determined that this roject would.not have a signifiCant adverse effect on, the environment, and hereby reiCOmrnends tw: finding of no significant impact and the issuantse of a MegatfvL- oslamat#on v1 the City Council. t, 3. This Commission on specifically finds that: ;, PLA.WNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT RE: DA 87-02A April 13, 1988 _7k..... Page _3 11 ?� (a) The location, design and proposed uses set forth in the Development k�cewwnt are compatible with the character of Existing developaw:t in t.fta vicinity; (b) The Development Agreement will produce internally an enviroment of stable and desirable Character. and not tend to cause any traffic congestion on surrounding, or access. a:��^jjts,, (c). The proposed development will bO wall integrated into itg setting; and I (d) The , Develop�aent Agreearent confor n to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cuc� ��onga. r 4. It is exprl.'-ssly found that the public iacessity, general welf0e and good zoning practicat)reWirat the approval of the "lopment Agreement, '> S. It is fur°thtr found that the Increase in unit density to 3S.05 dwelling units per acre is In the best in.terasts of Uw public health, safety and welfare since the protect as contamplated will. s'.e occupied -by Zaniorr, households of low income, in conformance with the' provisions of California Govornment Code Section 6591S. 6. kris Comwis{. "m hereby recommends approval of the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 1.•,,;and directs that a certified copy of this Resolution and related material �e forwarded to the City Council for final determination. 7. The Deputy Secretary to this Co mission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND''ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL s 1981. PLANNING C"ISSlON Op THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC"MGA BY: harry MC lei-,- a clean ATTEST: ra u er, epu acre wry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucanonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introdstced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga+ at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of April, 2988, by the following vote -to -Tait: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COWISSIONERS:, 8 v ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ni )4 XT _ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIOW-aW Tfk'1iANCHO �UCM ONGA PLANNING C"ISSION RECOPWNDria APPROVX(OF A REQUEST To MEND THE LAND USE 14AP OF THE GENERAL PLAN, GPA 87 -04H, FROM L0W.KOIUK RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 WELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO OFFICE FOR A 1.69 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCKBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE Rai, RANCHO, C1.T.4WNGA, i CALIFORNIA, Al!,,,NAKT FINDINGS IN `PPORT THEREOF A. Recitals, (t) Me3t End Irtvesti sts has filed art-application for General *Ian Airendment 87 -04H as described in the title of this Reesolution. FNtreina #ter in this Resolution, the subject 6arQral :Plan Amendwit is referred to "as "The , Application.* (iii on April 19„ IM. tie Plamning °Coemission of ttie pity of Rancho Cucai mga conducted !:= duly noticed 'public hearing on The �Ipplication ;t and concluded said hearing on that date. ( �_'.) All legal prerequft1tes to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. t 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Comrisissidr., of the City of Rancho GMtaiaonga as follows: i' 1. This Commission hereby specifically ftCds that all lof the facts. j set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correg 2. Bzsed upon substantial evider4e presented to this Coarmeission written land abora�l'restaffc reports, together withpep 13, esti including Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: public testimony, this (a} The Application applies to a 1.69 acre parcel o� land on, basjtally rectangular in configurati located on the west side of ANh bald Avelue, south of Base Line Rnad. Said property is currently designated as Lovr,lMediusl Residential (4 -8 - de4elling units per acre) on ttie Land Use Map of the General Plan and is curr'fsttly developed with an . older silgl a family residence and several smaller storage structures, and b desi mated Neighborhood The to the north of the subject site is g g ommrciai on the land Use Nap of General plan and consist$ of a neighborhood commercial shopping center, the property to the south of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling unit`s Auk Per acre) on the Land Use Map of the General Plan end consists of low density single family residential, the oroperty to the east is designated as Ueighborhood'"Commercial and Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre} _ sir{ the Lard Use Map of the General plan and consists of a neighborhood commercial PLANNIN& COWIS.�IOM RESOLUTION No. r „ f— A-If fT 13, 1M# Page 2 shopping center and Tow dismi'�ty Ingle faaily rasidential, ar!d tN�+! prop y to e �wast is designated _ i= ihisidential t dwelling units pPr arrdy t the Lind .Lis* NeaP Of the General Pan and consists of vacant la�rsu, and on of the Sc$ The ApPlication "WOSts the AWOUnit of the Land US.* Mal) o theGeneral acrean fraar Law~ diva4 Residential # -G dwelling UAIts per acraN parcel to t and ETaaent of thed Gsner Plano WOW d not result n,Potentti,4111 significant adverse impacts to "per sons &” P" "Pty in the in wilatt vicinity of the subject site, and ;4d be in the best fAterests of , safety, and the h"Ith, welfare of the ,�nS of the cfty�"6f Ranc�a'#uc e. ;, , 3. Bas*d upon the substontim7 ovfdma PrestMod to this Commissi6n during the abova- referenc ed public,,hearing and the Specific finds s of fact set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2,, t%e, this i3aforn he concludes that the application old be consistent th the o hereby ir.4f i.ha Land Use ETeereni< of tier i rreraa NO, mmld b* i the blts�, interaafts of '%e City of Rancho Cucaa a, `and n Id protect tha 1� oaf , aria Volfara, of the citiasrns of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4. In eoniu.action with The , Preliminary Envirommmtaal Assessaent, in confc�l� Application. Initial Z_.9dy b the California Environatentar t y requirements with Uuelity Act, has bnNen prapared The Comission has determined that this PMJ*ct would not have � Significant adverse effect on the environmrint, and hereby recowds the finding of no significant im;,act and the issuenoe of a Negative Declaration by the City Conrtc��. Based uPon`the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 abo , this COWISSion hereby recoa"nds' APProual of Tie Application and diracts thatr,& coart1fied and r iatetl a of this 't€eSOiutientn ' material be forwarded to the City Council f�� ffinal detarminaticn. 6. The adoption of this Rest oll. eta4y to t IS COmission Shall certify to the l APPROVED AND AWPTED THIS 13 I'll, OF APRIL,!, 1988. � PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF t3 160 CUCAMOtiGA BY airy e a rnran ATTEST. ra 8'u1'TTr epu y. ecr4 Dry w FLF,�lNIfa(s COWtSSIOA RESCLUTIO.4 No,�7 _ -April 13 Ina — Page J 1, ardd w4r, rn ►ty Secrawy of the Planning Ca issiah of fire city Ra�nc:ta CilGtslali4rl,.:�ta hereby C+erti!y teat tk4 fort�,�ing R aTnt4�rt was skrl� ara regulariY ;fa�tradtrct�l, pxsseee, and a+ tod .bi w,a RAM.rg Comission of the O ft t of iRaft Cup: . 4t * rWlaf *4tin9 Of aria PIUMag COWSSion held Oft the 13th dqy at e, 198, by the follow Ag va*a!to- itx AYES: CfiTSStS; . t j 1705S: COMISMms: i 1 { 1 ! j O 1 RESOLUTIOA:-jr. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COM MION REC04KNOING DENIAL OF A -REQUEST TO AMEND THE LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS 87-NN, ) TO OFFICE R A 1.69 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST $' BE OF ARCHIPA! D AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD. RANCHO CUC*ftd. CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINOINSS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Pe,. als. (i) hest End Invessjwts h )filed an application for General Flan Amendment 87 -04H as described in the,- tie of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this ReseNtion, the subject Gen*!il an A�mend"nt is refer He to as "The Application." Cucamonga canted La , duly noti ed Planning � ssiOn tl0 City en and concluded said hearing on that date. App3icatin (iii) All 1 al re - have occurred. p "isites to the adoption of this Resolution B. Resolution. fib W4, THEREFORE. it is 'hereby found, deteMined. and resolved by the Planning Commmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission - Hereby specifical'iy finds that all of the facff i set forth n the Recitals, Part w, of this Resolution are true and correct, 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refsrenced public hearing on April 13, 1988 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: basically rectangularlin onf guationaplocatedoon a 1.69 the wvestrside oflArchibald Avenue, South of Base Line Road. Said property is currently designated as Low-Med.ua Residential (4 -8 dwelling units Or acre) on the Land Us^- Map of the General Plan and is curreWy developed with an older single family residence and several smaller storage structures, and designated NeighborhoodC rcial onothe Land Useotiap the of General site is consists, of a neighborhood commercial shopping center, the property to the south of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) on the Land Use heap of the General Plan and consists of lot, dGhsity single family residential, the property to the east yeighborhood is designated as Commercial and Low Residential (2 4 dr.,rlling units per acre) on the,Land Use Map of the General plan and consists 'A a neighborhood commercial stopping center and low 62nsity single family re�identiai,;and the property to L i; PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION N0. GENERAL PLAN AmEmt9m-87 -041 Page 2 1' the nest is designated k.ow- Medium Residential (4 -8 d:all±ng units per acre) on the Land Use ftp of the General Plan and consists of vacant land; and (c) The Application roquests the Amen nt of the Land Use f+lep of the General Plan'frc* Low-Radius Aesidential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) for the 1.69 acre parcel to Office; and J c� (d) The Plication would not be consistent with the Land Use Element of the C'neral Plan, and would not be in the best interests of the health, safety, ad welfare of the citizens c1f the City of Rancho Cucamonga by further oxtendinp undesirable non - residential uses into an axisting and established s:,,idential neighborhood. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during thg above-refenwed public hearing and upon tr* specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Cc� ssion here4y�4inds and concludes that the application would not be c;onsistentlaith the obfeciI- of the Land Use Element of the Gentral Plan, would not be in e s ioi, sa of the City of Rancho Cucaaaaaoatga, and would Hot protect the heaal �y,� sager, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, rlifornia, •4. Based upon the findinqu and conclasiGns set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, dad 3 above ' Commission hereby recommends denial of The Application and directs that a certified Cory, of +this Resolution and related material be forwarded to the City Council fo`r ',►final detenatnatton. S. The Deputy Secretary td this Coaeaission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL,'8988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0: ATTEST: Brad Buller, _epu y Secre Pry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify thfit the foregoing Resolution was dul.•and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by 'fie Planning Commission of"/the - City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cnnamission' held on the 13th day of April, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COWISSIONERSt NOES: t"ISSIONERS: ABSENT: C&XISSIONERS ` A RESOLUTION OF THE RAMHO CUCAMW,4., PLANNING CWISSION RECD MI'ENDIM APPROVAL OF A REQUEST` TO lEtE! THE DEMOPMENT DIST€cIC? 9KAP. I 8i -fiE, FTO14 LON-DlEDTHE RESIDEPfi7AL i4-8 tlNc�.f.YNC UNITS M ACM) TO OFFICE/ PROPESSIOMPa. FOR A 1.69 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBAW AVENUE, SOUTH OF WE LINE ROAD, RAMCHD CUCJIE , CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT A. Rec. �itais. District (Amendment 187-06 ass described jad the titllsc of this Resolution. R Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Oevelo�raent: District Amendme it referred: to as "The Application." (if) Oil April 13, IM, the Planning Coftission of-tht City of Rancho Cucamnga cory:;zted a duly noticed public hearing ,�ytpiitatioc� and con;.luded said h�V�ring on thaF dtte. an Th red All have ooccurred. . legal Prerequisites to the adoption or this, Resolution B. Resolution. Planning ,.THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deferm#ned, and resolved by the CoOissinn of the City of Rancho CucaMonga as follows: forth 1 i This Commfssion hereby specifically finds: that all of the facts set n tihe Recita!*. Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. the 2. Based up ;n substantial evidence presented to this Commission during oral astaff resa ts, public hearing cub prIT limo 1988, including written and specifically finds as follows: n, this COMMission b by (a) The Application applieso a I..69 acre parcel of land bsica1ly rectangular in configuration, located art the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, Said property is currently designated as Lore - Medium r Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) On the Development Mstrict Map and is currently developed wits, an older single :family residence and siveral smaller storage structures; and (b) ' The property to the north of thr, subsect site is desi Hated Neighborhood . Co+Mrcfal on the 6evelopment Dis_t'r tjec and tansies g a d neighborhood commercial shopping center, +�" sUbiect site fs designated Low Residential (2 -4 odwellingoun the- South of the #ts per acre) on the Deve1opmetrt District Ma dwelling ark r'Consists of low density single family residential, the property to the east is designated as Neighborhood Cormme°tial and Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) fn the Development District PLANNING CbR ISSION RESOLUTION 4 j. April is, I93E pagt 2 . PAP and easy is of aE 7ighborhW4 40 rcla t shopping center and lcv+v density single 1"aaril *�sidtnt at; aim tp '• to tike 46st is designated Residet4tel ( [l 4np Wirt* C Low - 10"t a oepwnt District iap an d consists of e j Ofstrict M f T1±te PST #cation rs*I s t±t ps�t° e¢ tiiNr O+evtlr rit P t r�lied10* Residential I+k,•t3 d�rettty0 Chits per Acre) to Off iCe/°rdfosional for tile, 1 >A9 acre par:arl a'td of the General 4n,�*Wld not it,. Aar ti fs ant E ;ant 3 !o cts to persons and ero y -30 i adverse and KouId be in the t> ,"Url4;:tt of t Vicinity of t �3 apct rite, citi�;tns ox the Cite of kgcho tuhaa a. the 3. 6estd upon the- suhstantfaal tvidw i.4 p tttd to this €si+in during abevt,. rw4d Public hearing amt �a tt2!! s iffo , fact set tcrth ia4,p agray�hs $ 4" 2 &bo o. this �:o*i;Tsiot hi ,irldii�gs (if Land ltdt3 ti`ali: thlr '44AMM iwld W consistent with ' Qiiti f�S inds Of t the Land testit�cent of the Cameral flan, itwld ,:6e in the bust intev of The City ai Ranciw Cuciw�cr:ga: and amulet ppra�;Oct the hwlt�h, iMotYx an9 reelfare of the citiatns of Rancho CucamOM, Csiiforniad a. In conjunction 'wi3 h. The Enviraniartrttal sessaaent ti. c nfoywias LWith # $� Y;..�icrctyl !�relin�inar�r California Environmental y ' i is °' With the determined t;3at this �` ' ,�, ten PreA� red, The Com�iaissiorr has Pct would nog have a significant aAVerse effect on ",e eneriraninent and hart# roc `i?dS the finding of nq Significant impact and the issuance of a RkWivt Declaration by the :ity Cou,"C I. 5• tfasad upon the findin % tad dnclustcns sit fat�th in paragraphs 1, 2, and agave, trafs Coiission hereby recctnds appr,�va3 of The +�Aplicatfon and directs that a cer4ifitd copy 'If this Rasolu"Oh Od re'tattd material be forwarded io the Ciftyy &t�znci i \for final datermfnation, adoptt n cf'this'R Oept tip -etary to this Canissfan shall Certify to the APPRQY£tt AM AMPTED TItIS I?T" Qti Of':;riPM, 1988. PLANNING C"ISSIO# Of Tft CITY O a Nil; Cie"! (3liQA A1_ESTt eCr ��ry PLANNING COWISSTON RESOLUTION go, 74 OEVELOWENT Im OrSi ICT A WMENT 87 -06 S a' jl Brad ,mot 1 Nmuv S=rsury 'of the R1 Ptn t-ne%o Mi y 4=04 isn of the City of �Raetnttx - hrrN co ';�hn the T� I at tiara}' - 1 } MY of R4"C"O Cuc , A* 6t a r adopt" by fi►mnning Ca�fitf9 a t➢sr i3t€e y' * �tpt� ryguTyar pq yt± of V* Planning q �, fJ W. -O i7._, 1;M, ,d� "1� l/y +y�y{�. y��Y ,,,,.t "issi n ht ABsEr M ssaaNE ; 1 l J RESOLUTION No. A RESd3LUTZDN 4N" THE RAWHO CUCAMONeA PLANNING Ct ZSSZON RECOWINDINQ OF,NIAL OF A REQ(EV TO AMEND 'niE DE6'Ei,+7�P1�4£Kt AZSi`EIC� 1�', t}DA 87�, t"RdP4 LONpt�tilU�! REEIIi£NZ'Il1l: f� -8 DNEi.LIt� tJiip'i5 �R ACRE1 Tfl t1FFICEf PRaF£sGYa. Ft36� A6 1 d9 ACRD t�RitCE�. LOCCA�ED ON TH£ BEST 5It3E !3F ARt:HI81&D AV18, wed Ofi 8A5!; LIriE RtJ, RAi6CH0 f:UCAt�t}ta CALIFORNIA„ Aft �E F'ZNitINGS Zit SUPPt?RT �REOF A. Recce. #fast End Investments F.as mid an wpp[itation for Devel District Amendment 87 -06 as described in the tittat of Ws Resolr n. Hereinafter in this Resolutiar,, the sub$"t Dievelop nt Digtrfct ecsdment is referred to as ThQ AppT r�tias. tit) April 13,, _ 19", the Planar izrrian of the try off- Rancho Cucamonga caftdi c%d ar early noticed public °leering on 7be App'iic�t', aad canCluded said honing trot date. r Ion (red. i) All i.r gal prtisraquisites have occurred. to the adoption ;s- this -Ift"Ilution 9. Resdiutibn. ,< WW, THEREFORE,, it is hereby found, determined, and re9o,',0d by the Planning Coa�ission of the City of Rancho CUca"nga ss folla}d i I; This Comission tereby specifie;A %iy finds that all of the facts set forth Yn the Recitals, Part A, of this Aesgiutian ark true and correct. �. Eased upon substantial evidence presented the above- referenced public hearing n p n ed to this CarrmFissian during, oral staff reports, together rtrith� Publicrttestimo y, this Cdi 4ssionthereby specifically finds as follow: r` tai The Application appligs to a 1.69 acre pamt! of land aaesicalfiy rectangular in configuration, located o >r n the west 'Side Archibald Avenue, south of Base Luce Road. Sad property is Currently designated as Low-RediLim Residential t4 -8 dwelling units per acre? on the Devctapn+ent District Map and is currently develop .-d with-'an OT single family residence and several smaller storage structures* and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Neighborhood CoWercial on the D0velopme District t€ap and consists of a' neighborhood conererciai shopping center, the property P ands south of the the D subject site is designated Low Reside (? -4 dwelling units per acre) on the Ueveioprnent District %P and 6wisists 'of log density single farriiy residential, the property * the east ft" designated as Neighborhood f`''' and Lett Residential (24 6eiling units per acre; an the paverhoodnq srcfal �`ap aY, consists of a neighbar'hood 40mereial shopping renter and t, w "density Single farnii' rest ntiai, and the property to the rest is dosigzlated Lowe- PLANNING 0WISSIGH RESOLUTION 40. DEVELOPMENT 'DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -06 P Apilil 1908 Mali Residential (4-8 dwslTing whits per acre) on the Qbvetopment District Map and consists of yra;ant land, and (c) 'the. APplication requests the loodftent of the Developoo>ent District gap if= Low- ftdfurx Residential P-8 duelling digits par. acre)-,to, Office/Professional ?or the 1-ft acre parcfl, and (d) "he Application Wald not be ccnsi�starrt with the Land use Eleaoent of the General PYan, and would not he in the best Interests of ;:ha health, safeily, and "tlfare of tl* citIZ&F, of 00 City of Rancho Cucano3n9e By further extending y4Edesirable non- mi(Wtial uses into an exis$ieg ard. �,- established residentii l neighborhood. eturin � the ; xubstential emiden O prr,sen4d to. this Cmd5sion aferi�ncsd Public hearing and upon the sp+j#fic findings of iact fiat fat- -r"paragraph1V 1 and. 2 above, this �4aaeiasim hey i:oncludes the& the applietttoc� ►Id RQt be cOnSiStMt with the ob tt�gsa f the Lmnd Use Element of they jk^terai Plan: would_. not he in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ,_and would not r-bu wt � health, safety, and welft" of the Citixeos of Rancho CucaM Mo. CC'Vifornla' 4. Basal uptn the findiap mid conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, thin Corraoission hereby recoMWadf denial of The Application and directs that m Certified Cop)r of this Rexriiutiort,and related material be forwarded to the City Council far -final deterijaction., 6. 7h4- Deputy Secretary to this CooaaoiSsfon shall certify to the adopZlon of thus R�solutiaa. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13Th DAY Of APRIL, 1988. PLANNIMG ComrssI0M OF THE CI '; OF RWH'O CqCA4OWGA r BY; r Carry T. WN1677MMITAmd I C ATTEST: - f 1. grad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Coaoaoission of the City o.F Rancho Cucaeeonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutian was duly 4nd regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by tbe; Planning Commission of itne City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coarnission held on the 131;:`day of April, 1988, by thi €clJawing votebto -wit, AYES: CtL"'CNrRSr NOES: C SSIONERSs ABSENT:: COMWSSIONERS • l� A RESOLUTION OF THE RAWgA cLcAWWP1 p iIN6 FHlf3.iai?t! AFPRQFNB t?€{iELfPPP1EdiT ttEYFE�I N0. 8733, fNE �EYEI.flPIt QF 17o SENFOR ARAIiTliiiS OFr 4.85 ACkES ZN= IANE! aaa Ti?E Mr- AIEpI�i RESiUE1QiI+�i. `k?FSTR ?Cf ( [i�4iEi l:iAiG !i#iFiS t?ER :� ACRfi, aLM ON T Sgl)1'Fr SIi3E Oi BRSE LANE ROAD, ASi OF ARCHaBAtQ AVENl1E APRo 2QB- 03f -10 1 19�, n A. Rac� fs� f i j best end Investments has ft 1CI are application fir the approval of Osv OM-42 '.RQV4 w )ft. 87 -33 as described in the title: of this Resolution. Fkrseini�ft r in this RGS61utia'K, thee subject Uvolopant, gowlew regvaest is referred to ae °thee applicstionn. till at the 13th of ApM7, 1988, the Plenoiag Caweeiaezio es4 the City of Rancho Eucae _gat corduct4d a Meeting an the application and concluded said meeting on thRt "to. _ tred. All legal prerequisites to the �� Uon' of this"iiltalution have occurred.,, [[ B. Resolution. jFGF NOW, THEREFORE,_, it is #otreby �oUnO; detaertained and resolved by tht Planning Commission of the .fty of Rancho rwamooga As follr3ws; 1. This Cissiorn hereby specffi'cerll finds z� : set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Rtsol�tion area true a o(",. corn t 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented t4 this CCMISsion during the abovee- rteferenceed Meeting on April 13, 19881 inclLidi writtih and III oral staff reports,`this Comaission hereeby spqcificalrry finds as folloirs: l J Ca? The application applies to propperty, mated un the south side of Base Line Rand, west of Archibald Avenue with a i street f�iitage of 3�B � feet and lot depth of. 643 fee =t and is presently improved with a singY* fa�aily residence; and : fb2 The ,property, to the north is designated for cor."rr'ial uses and is developed with a stoppiseg center. The property to the` outs, and- west are designated for residential Uses and are developed with _Si►�g1e ra*ily residences. The! property to the east is desf4"ated fzlr c`E rcial and residential uses. The commercial piece is devoloF.ad xitf:: a sh,�ping center; and the residential piece is developed With sirgl`sePily residences; ati . "-" J% PLANNING ClOWISSTO' 9SOLUTION NO. OR a Mull. April 13, 19W 7—_ Page 2 cc) n*\,appl1ca6t has submitt ral plan Develpr~t *d k5i�Wt P-nd: District Aftndwnt to C:jAngs thft Und use d4sig"AtfOra from Low-, Residen%ijitj to High pASIdentig, and a '301or Ho4,, District. With the, appr ng Overlay Oval Of ttw��rAaera I Plan and-Aevolopwt 1)jstrjct�� A'P'On&ents, th* PrVJ4Ct Wil' be consistent with the U"r$l Plan and,,ftot the! InUct, and raqujusmts of DOWOOPMt Code. 3- _W the substantial evidence pres*nt".to this comiesio", during thO 4bOve"rOfk*nCOd Matting and woo the spftific findings of factj� Set forth in Pirilfraphr 1 and 2 jbqyQ Concludes as follows-. this Cc"-_ $Sion her*by. finds ano, (a) 'That", tw)i propow, proAct is consistent with' the obhctivas,of the 40"rol, Plan- MW (by That the P�op� ot Is in Occorls.-With the objaWw'-f-.0 of the f*014MAt 04 and the purposes Of the district in which is located; -,and' (C) That the pm,�W US& it "ift CW11anoe With each Of the - "I I able prmtsions of the Development Code; and That the proposed us#, together with -the Conditions applicablo theireto. will not be detrimental W the public h@4,th,, safefo, or welftre, or Otorially injuejous to prot)#rties orloprovepents f,., the vicinity. 4. This CoMISSIon hqri&y finds and Certifies that the 'Enproi t has been reviewed 4nd considered in C"pliance with the California vitL Quality Act of 1970 and, further.. f Declaration. WS Cc* stiOn htrft issues a ftga"ttiave Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth r in 2 and 3 above, this O�Wjssion (i) , paritgraph each and #very condition grOby approves the apPT1C&tiOA'su.bjtkt to set below `4nd in the attached iSt d�rd Conditions gtUched hereto and incorpora -an ted 4�refa by this ref#renceo Planning Division: (1) The following items shall be incorporated into th I e "final landscape plans wkich Sre Subject to tevi ev and approval by the, Cit! Planner prior to, the issuance of building pemit-S.- a) ExtensiveL landscaping shall be provided 'Around I the perimeter of the site. b) The driveway median shall be plarkted with materials 'satisfactory to the Foothill Fire District. 0 The driVeWayr'connection at the southeast corner of the site shall be turf block for gmepqency access only..; Q PuwNiNG Cowrssloii RESOLUTrON k0. RE. OR 87 -33 WEST END INVEST. � April 313.�ISi� d) The tress to be rmoved shall be 'Aplaced with tho largest speciaran- sias. evailable. (2) ireilis strtrr'aires�ir► be provided over the trash anclasures �tts plans sha reviewed and approved by the City Pli�r��rir to the isnCe +of .duildin9 pe,ii5. A decoratiVe..block <wall shall be ragoirad around.,the peri8etar r oo the site, axt:luding tare southern ports of the ea3t bou�sdary. , The M11 3h I bd installed to avol any d"bla wall situations: The plans 0411 bat Mftwrad rand approved, by the City Planner-prior to the ixsuence of grading pem t , (4) Approval of the project is contingent ' appF`�ipal oi' general Plan Aaend ent 8T-M, Development Dis �lb endgent 87 -lk5 and "elolant Agreeer 87 -02. (5) The ;naval of the 28 i6tu !trees sha11 require l aith`the la est'cru replacant j r9 rsery y,�`otatt tr"S.0 ilable, as deftrmin#d by ��fie City Planner, The applicant s411 submit t'plan °and list of the trey species, height and trunk CirCUMfarr:nCe as Wasured iwanty -four inches from ground level, for the 28 existing trees., (6) A fi.naT, acoustical analysis shall be submitted' to address n ®isrleee]s.acthef Bane Line road for interior and exterior City Pt nnt+r prior to the rt shall he i suanCa of Dui nand approved by the j 4 permits. Engineering Divisions (1) Stoup drain fACilities and private drainage'easements shall be obtai ed through the property to the east to drain the project - sbte to Archibald Avenue. (2) An nelergenpy access easaa#ent across the Property ta' this east to insure emergekTy ingress and egress to Archibald Avenue and the conszrUCtion 6.1 a mountable curb shell be obtained prior to Issuance of a. wilding permit. (3) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrnunding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) On the OPPO.51te side of Base Line Road alt be paid to the City prior to the i Xuance of building sha1T be one -Iyalf l -the City LIdopted unit amoutpti�essthe length of the project frontage. (4) Drainage from the site shall be Ootletted onto Archibald Avenue In such a manner to not cause ,damage to the property toy the south as approved by the Ci PLAMMIN4 COMISS104 RESOUTION RE: OR 87 -33 WEST Eta IAiY9.1 Paige 4 tS � fat, tote East Lift Road dr Iyerrk� sight lines shall be Plotted on the latndsc plans to msttut'e adequate Safe, unobstruct", stwirs 31 lt'dIatarttce as approved Or at City Engineer. � # bcMary to this Coaesisaion shall ca*rt-Ify, to thak _w1 l� adoption of this il�olutt APMED AW AOMM THIS„13M CAY tif' APRIi:, 19N., Pt. ItrE� CGR[il Itkrf W iM CITY 0 RAOM CIXCCI IC ar;� = �� Wry ! , r*ar «" Al EST:. r O U"uw-wc iv I, Brad Buller-j, Deputy Secretary of the Flaming ti"O pion of the city of Rancho Cue s, do hQr*bY certify that tore f4ra+gei lUtIon was d%ly and regularly nt ed Paused, and adopted pry the fCorratt st;iori f that? City of Rase , a#i a rl lar< �tatin� of that lala Ug COW.'rsSi* Whe�4 on the 13th day Of * I '. by the follMig vote -to- t: AYES: AS: Y P�QFS; GO�Is�SID1�RS. r ABSENT. co"ISSiM".. _ J f vt } RESOLUT111 . NO. A,RCSOLUTiION OF J.49 RANCHO, CUCANONGA PLANWING CMMrtsIQK AORROVING DEYaOPI &- T- >REVILit NO. 87-34, THE oEVELMiENT A 15.000 SQUARE FOOT, MEDICAL OFFICE BUILOINP ON 1.7 ACRES OF LAW IW THE LOW401tpjj� SfDENiIAL DISTRICT • PENDING). lot TED ON TK_ wESy:- (GEdiERi�L 'PLAN AFIE;.t SIDE OgF��ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SWTH�yQF BASE LTD{€ It�AO APN: 031471 54. K J f AND S Recitals. !t) West End Tnvestmients has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 81-34 as described in the title - of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this ResolutiOn, the subject Devel�ment Revise request is referred to as °the application".; (it) On the 13th of April. ice, the Planning Commission of tHQ. City of Rancho Cucaatonga conducted a Mating on the application and coe►cludad- said wetinq'fA1 that date. All legal "prerequisites to the adoption of this l�esolut*on have oFcurred. B. Resolution. NON, 'THEREFORE, it is hereby Planning Copmi$Sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as determined by the 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that rll of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. Of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presennted to this Coertisson during the above- referenced meeting On April 13, 1988 including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spectfically finds as follows: al Thar application applies to property located on thi'west side of Archibald Avenues sout�r f Base Line Road with a Street frontage of 260 feet and lot, <dopth of 283 feet and is presently improved family resd and with single M The dence.; designated for tomw�ercia] uses and sare developedhwith shop 'inf eta site ar properties to the south ad east are designated for residential uses and are developed with single faeiiy homes. (c) The applicant has Submtitited a General Plan Am�endme d Development District Amendment tb change the land' use designation fry tad Medium Residential to Office- professional. With the approval of the General Plan and Development District Amendments, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and meet the intent and requi rements ' Of the Develo ent Code. 11 „ - 9.3 ,� e PLliEMUS COWISSION PESMUTIOlt Vii, f; � DEVELOPMM REVIE W 87 -:34 M itE3'T Eta? > April 13, Y38£a - Pap BOW aapeo' the substar;tial ovidenca presarntsd to this C isxi~en during as steting and up" the npecific findings 4f facts sat iOro in r>Apr Ph 1 444 R a, this O*MSSfort taarreby finds and conclu0s s, fa awk .i tall_- '-'hat the nropa ' project it a~0411stont with the oblsttivos of V* sanarat'�+�; ad that 'that proposed use is in WXOV4 with, that OwscOv* of the Devoloomt icode, and , rite n,Puy" 1kS of 06 district 14 *M=h #CIE, ;Sit* is Iftateft and cI, That tom. Oroosm vto is in pwian# with Oach of the 40011 ia# i pvwisio c, o4, t'�rant Cn�r; and Ow tdg that the Propow os+e, then, with Uw ccxtditi rs APP11cabl* ihaer#te Will t be dotwimental to t* Public fQt1# saf *tY* ar was'ii`dr ;ter materially injurious to #t r;t1#S ' or 10provewts ire tho vicinity,,- _ a. J'hiS Coaaxi$Sfon horoby finds artd c� ffi *s that °the �r ,Oct bas bon revie"at :;and tanSidard in crrepliarac* with Mfftrnis vironme rtal Quality Act of 1470 and, fur r, ti#is ficaaareission hereb. 'issues a Negative Declaration'. 1 S. Based upon tha findings ,arid[ conclusions sat font, in' pa�+sy�raph . 1. 2 and 3 above, thfi CONJSSiart iterft *"royal tiro :pplJC4 n, ri-rnf to t edth and every ccmditiorr .$rat fa0% balow and rs �trrae tta�;hed 5tandar�f Conditions attached hi�r<retif and `ir aarpEoratad h Min by this reform*. Plsnnirlo bivigion _ The rust ace"t color *.,hall be changed to intaearatr with the existing MOMMal Centor to t#te nartA. The icalorr $hall be r<ra!viewwed and eppMved by the Desigxs EevieN Caraipaittes prior to the iSSaake of baildingr parsits, (2) The removal, Of the 6e , Mature trees shalt re(pire repiacewnt with tine latrgeSt nursery growrti trees available, as determined 'by the' C .Ity Planner. _,'That applicant shall submit a plant- and'.' , list of the tree Species, h0ght, and trunk circwxferenc,e as �Re:iura!d twrenty -fauw 'inches from ground` Ievol', for tht 64 existing tr+tps. ,., Ne applicant shat11 Submit' do rlanentatiaas Of;NOlacaftnti Including a plan, wo tine City Plaaanert, riorr to the r�wvail of the t�raes. a PLANNIWa C"ISSION RESDU OR mo, DCVEp.4P'FKN'i` REVIEW 87-34 -REST 00 � 13 3* 1988 R (3) A dacorati}ve black wall sMll bf required along the south boundar!r, 'Xht wall shall teMnatte far enough M back frog: ,Archibald Avenue to,,.avotd �r disru tion to tike cool' . system 0� the .. Carob Tract lit tho ' southeast Corner. The design of the wall slFall be shown on the f1na1 ire -1lding Plana aed stall be reviewed And apprdved.by the City plarsar V,rior to the ;is!ara,.1ct of greding parts U. (4) The drfveaasy at ir2ho $ _Itt comr of the site shall be tut-f block to provide acerge y access bettsean this site eqd the site to the kalst. 7h# U" -block $hall be 'i rated Into the fi4sl landscape lan which shall e'rrvieswed and by the CrIty Planner prior to the issuance of Wilding pmattc. inwkrrir� atvisforr ' !1$ A. 0Pfvat,4 drainage asawt ievor of the propsrt4 to the west shall be p I-Mg the southern pr'ooent' line. 1j (x) For the Archibald Avenvia driveway, sight lines syal1 the platted on the landscspe plans to assure adequate srlfe® urvobstructad stopping sight distance as aaipcaved by the,City Engineer. r a d3 "go Stopping Any Tina m z0fit Will be- rewired on Arehlbald Avenue. 1 R j4j (4) DrIft''age frog the:, sits shall "'t outletted ants Archibald`+ Avenu�!44rr such a fw' er to !rat cause gi to theyreperty to the smith as approved by - '' Weer`. nt outlet,, facility could = consisyr� a"kway drain or pipe �d catch basin suss letting south' Of 0.0 existin - driveway adJ40— $ to the south property line and a rolling Of said driveway if permission scan be obtained free the property owra'ers.„ (S) An enrgency access +�asetxent in favor of the property to the nest shall be providad to ensure ftergeney ir1ress and egress, tt� Archibald Avenue. �• The Deputy secretary to is Coaarission shad cartify to the adoption of this Resolution. 'XAMMING CO*r$SIG# RESOLLfTrOM No. OEYEL~ 4EEVIrW 87-34 « WEB EW AprleIZ, 1988 _ Pa AND AiiOPTO THIS 137H DAY APRIL„ 1988. PLAMMIta COWISSION'OR 7NE CITY OF RAbGEq C4iCAMi[IiliUt BY: um—T.–TWO-1. COMM- ATTEST: r oul lor, MOM g9rouff �f 1. �Brad Imlldra 0l" Siidt'f"YdrY Of the Pllwmiro8 CiWasion of the Ci of Raft4w Cuc 46 hereby certify that forajAq- Rrs�'IUti*n ewes + 1 an+i regularly ntrb&ctd, passed, grad adop the Flowing Comet n v"A ttv City of Rancho CucOmon a, a regular eertirtri�� 0, tit Ply n CoWssion held on the 13th "! of 1, 19m, by the follolrifl��fii�•rt�h�: AYES: CONNISSIONERS: NOES; CGFIIISSIOIRrRS" ,� r ABSENT: o t CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA ct r STAFF REPORT DATE: April 13, 1388 v y TO: Chairman and Members of thl1i' Planning Coruaissiort; FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Debra Meier, A!sacfate Planner SUBJECT: CON6ITi6NAL USE PERMIT 88012 WtSI'm PROPERTIES the evP -1,� n r4 cona1un s < p n center, consisting of fou.Yreajor retail buildings tota�Irrr[�g$19,i j square feet, ad$o 1irs�,wall situps totaling 137,34b" square feet, nine satedte :retail buildings totaling 43,550 square fegi satellite, office buildings totaling 27;325 ;� are feint, four restaurant pads, and "a 30,99 squor,. =foot theater. - Conceptual approval for a design c,,,ter consisting of ten: buildings totaling 195,560 square A�et. All on 71 acres of land in the Community Cwrwercial strict of the Terra Vista Planned c9mmunity, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - AFN: 1077 - 42145, 06, and 13. �- V-1 i. BACKGROUND: The proce!�;r14 of a Conditional Use Permit for Tern s a owan enter is in response to a recent Planned Cmmunity Text -Amendment which,,:row requires a Conditional U-Sc permit for all shopping center. Essentially, this Conditional Use Permit will replace the Development Town Center. Development Review (DR 87 Vista for Terra -39) as the approving document II. ANALYSIS: The attached resolution includes all conditions of� approve as included. in Developaent Review 67 -39. It also includes; some additional conditiW regarding site maintenance to be in accordance with appproved plans and conformance criteria pertaining to noise levels t�or loading and trash pick up activities Those:. conditions are being routinely placed on-all shopping centers per City Council direction. III. ENVIRONMENTAL - ASSESSMENT: As a result of the enviri en assessrAen prepare or Development Review 87 -37, a Regat e Declaration was issued for Terra Vista Town Center On December 1987. r� ,�� a PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT = RE: Up 88 -12 - WESTZU PROP. April 13, 1588' Page 2 a ` TV. PACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Prapased project is consistent ,with the e ec ves a Central Flan and the Terra Vista Car pity Flan. The p.03act wilt- not bt detrimental to ad$aEcent properties or cause significant envirorm*nttl ir4mcxs. The use and building design, together with all rcccamended c"dittons of approval, err in canfermnce ,fifth Applicable mwlat4� s of ttw w1ellopeent Cow and the Terra Plata COOmnity plan. V. CEIRRESPO"'W'* This itme has Fr9 m advertised as a public hearing € r1t newspaper, the property posted and not!"s sent UJIi"fT property vows within a 300 -foot radius. VI. RECL'�MATION: Staff r4cow"nft that the Planning, Commission aPpe0 +e �_arrdiii+�nAj Use Perritit 88 -12 to replace Dowelo ► � pMent f j Review 8741 for the approval of Terra VIstx Trxr Center. y G Rly t ra t Attachments; E It "A* site Plan /Locatipn of Ter, -a, Vista Toter ter i Resolution of Approval wits Conditions.\ t. VACAW ,V,tct "W Mrset pom "sr I "A YrrrrTTI CITY CF R AN M,C UC, kN K pG k Pinti Or IT T TrrLE. AJO EXHI A RESOLUTION OF 'UE "ou Cue PLANNING CWAISSION APPROVING ONDITIO USE PERMIT NO. 88-12 F4R 714E DEVELOPMENI(I OF AN INTEORATED C ITY I 20PPIA Wm CONSISTING OF FOUR MAJOR RVAIL BUIL6 NGs,'j` 'roTALING 319.OW, SQUARE- FEET -ADJOININGS PALL SW$ TOT&Y 137;395 SQUARE'�:FEET*��'INE UTELLITE RETAX OKLM TOTALING 43,550 CIVARE FEEt. 11WO SAULLITE OFFICE BUILDINGS TOT ' ALING,,- 7.325 SQUARE FEETj FOW XSTAU PADS, AND, , J�, P RW A 30,M SQUARE FOO irqKEPTUAL APPROVAL F) A DESIGN CEWMIZ OF TEM BUILDINGS TOTALING 1,95.60 SQUARE'7EET, K-uIX-1i ACRES OK LAW IN THE -CMNITY COWRCIAL PISTRICT CF TK 'URRA VIST)k PLANN-90 �j CO"N1.7y LOCAT90 AT THE. M, TREASr CORNW�- OF AVE!4UF FOOTHrLL ew�kYW Apm,- 1077.421-05, 06, 13. A. (I) Western Propfirtu�s bar filed an applicik"304 for"the issud e Of the Cond"14nal Use - PerNit No. 83-12 as described fi?, the title of Ws Resolution. HereinafU� Resolution, tht. SUM*) Cpnditfpnol 'Use Rqrmit,rPluest is refiz.-rAd 0 application". NO On, thou 13th of April, i4n, the pl4nnifig Commission of.-ithe City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a My notfeed public hearing on the application and COnC?Uded s4id hearing tin that date. All legal prerequlsites to the adoption of this Rasq1j;tion have occr,rred. Resolutift NOW, THEAFFORE, it is hereby found, deternihed and resolved by the q ComissionjOf the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows., J� 1. ) This Commission be.eeby t0eciftcal ly set forth in the Rtkitals, finds tMt Al I of the Part_J� of thffk, ResolutlOft are tMe and correct. 2. Based upon subStantial evidence presented to tilig Commissiod during tke above—referenced public hearing written and oraj On Irril 13, 1988, Including, staff re0orts, together with' p4blic tnstlmony, this COMMissiDn hereby specifically flnft as fol I ws (a) The applilcatJoh a*lft to property, �Iocated at the- northeast corner of Haven Ayclue and FootMll Boulevard with 4, street�frchtaqe- of WOO feet and lut depth of t144�1 feet and Is prfsently -.W, roved- and 0 PiittiNt?dG ISSYQi RE1TT �,` 7 • � � : ;�'� CUP � 2 WESTERN Pk 1 I for The property to the north of the subject site is vacant land, the property to south of that situ? consists of arr, office ,t lex, , the propel ty to the crest �s an et►tertzttrmentic� #fice �oalp�ex, add the property to the yeast is vecattt lad. i Based, uprn the ub anti i evidence presented try ws aatistion during. the above , fp> -, 4c hreax }ng and upon the iffic A, 3 ins of facts set forts it, paiigrpit and 2 ahovoy this �olsiort hand %) concludos as follM: i�' ! eb ,find s_ (a) That the proposed, (Project is consistent vi the objective of tht� rral plan;, acrd � 'j tbf 7hatc :the pro fuse is in acCorai with .the objective of the p"04wt code 00 Terra ` Vista cowj6iiy p1a111 and the purpc4s of the . distrtcf in which tfle site is located; and ;q tC) 'rNt the , proposed use is in ccipp3ince with each �'9f the applicable provisions" of the - itevelshnt Codes a�tty TeNra YisWa Cavity ialan,,,a n f F%l _ rd) . That the propagset� use � Ugt*or with 00 = conditions appliea:e the'rifp. will not -be detrimental to the public health, satiety, rrr U fare, or taatartattiy trdur ;ou;5 -to properptes or ipt'vttt7'i�f t7r;►ic`nfty. This Gomiti #lion hereby f %d; amd;,rArtiffes that the project has f Quart reviewed and canal coepltante the Caitforni Wittr �.Edvironmental Quality pct of 1970 and kfurther, a dative Declarasti� � �y JS'%Ued arty December 9, 1987 � ` S, Based upon the findino't: xatd con�c'{usions set forW- itt paragraph i, 2 and 8 above, this ct, etssiort ar(ere�ry the 'a �gproves glt Cation subject, esh and ever Condition setU T rth be)iorr arid. in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and ��t herein i?y? rrporat tames, ref -Mee. planning division tII Any transfartars, service areas or trash enclosuress lo6,,:ed, near the setbacks of Havers ..- Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall only be z considered tihen they are scroei by wing a COz*inat1,d of +rats, beets afa lafnuscaping. , u U PLANNING COWISSION REISOLUTION NO. RE: CUP 88 -12 - W4,YrERN PROP,r ; Page 3 ` - (2) P? osq � bus rhe`Rters on' lfavNh Avenue and v; Fo00811-i 80uleVard shall either be install with the street ivprovementj� or{I some time as a ed to by the City;, Engi der acrd City, P aiihar, , and shall `be arbhitecp,�,MT, compatible to the center. , Final designrr/of the Pius #helter shall be submitted for City plan ier PavT*O and approval prior to issuamm ' of jf/Ib:iilding permit. _ (3), The courtyards on either side of lajor 3 shall navel similar design, details and content as the reta l court near tiajors 1 and 2 allowing for changes in shcpe, of the actuei cour* yard area.: Design ;details of these courtyards shall be incluided in the ,fin l 'drawings. a reviewed and approved by the and reviewed Planner prior to F issuance of building (4) The roof the shall b substantiylly the srwe as the materip.l sample submitted and instazled in a randomly:ltacked Pinner. (5} An accent vr.ussoir shall be used on the entries to the major retAilera. "The location alai final materi9',selection shall be to the satisfaction:- - of thtr Design Revie%i.Committee. samples should be provided for rerkiew and app!,,, 1 1 prior, to Issuance of building permits. (6) Parking along Haven Aven" 'end Foothill Pooule&ard shall be screened. :y_ the use W t3 , foot berms and/or' low profile walls and shrub massing, (1) The street tree theme along- Toothi3l 1,jule 'eard shall ir.cie_de alternating drifts of Platanus racem5sa and Platanus acerifolia and shall be -' Indicated on the final landscape plan which is reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building pes�mits. (8) The promenade must be clearly, distinguishable � along its entire route through' the center. � SF,.6h items as lighting, street furniture, `sidewalk , color and patternp,i! landscape materials, etc; shall be consisteit throughout the entire length of the promenade. (9) All courtyard areas shall include the use of accent colors, including wahlous potted planti Svbj.±,ct to Design Review Committee approval. Z - *" 4 l PLRAING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE; CUP 88 -12 WESTERN PROP. April 13, 1988 v !4 ,-(10) The Pedestrian colonade at i " " `j "Y" play an important role i ntheifunctiono the corner treatment of- Haven and Foothill. \� Wherever feasible, such a colonede ' shall be incorporated around the two story portions of Buildings "X* and "YO. (11) The proposed four satellite building ,_ pad are s are approved in - concept only. Fut development for' each building oad shall be �I subject to the DMIapment Rejjrwtafisign iteView_ Process f0rfUnning Commission approvil,; „ {j (12) The -design of a Uniform Sign program shall i' ccWl,1meTrV the architectural program. Tr4 sign program shall Include all on -site signage including monument signs, theater �arqua, wall signs, diredtional signage, atc. The tts[ifom Sion Program shall bv1 subjecct to-approval of . the Planning CommissiWi prior to" issuance of building permits. (13) All future:. building pads shall., be seed and irrigated for erosion details control. shall be -included in the . lands cape and lrrigatiot ` plan approved by the P1arOng Division. (14) If -the applicant wished to exceed the e�axi t i1 light standard height,hey MV apply fora , varlanca or a Developmen Code Amendment. (is) 1411 street furniture, including drinking fountains, benches, trash receptacles, etc, 3hal7 be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Coekittee prior to issuance of bulling permits.. (16) -It Phasing is 'proposed, a phasing plan shall be subject to approval of the Planning Commission %r Prior to isscance of building permits. (17) Architectural details shall be ,reviewed by the Design Review C4=ittae prior to "issuance of ding permits. ; ; (18) The site shall, be developed and maintained in accordance with the approv�,d site plan,,-,which includes A�1chltectural eTevatidr:x, exterior' materials - and colors, landscaping and grading un file witel the Planning nivimion, the - conditions contained herein and Vevelopment Code regulations. - c PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: CUP S8' -12 = WESTERN' PROP. April 13� 1988 r/ (19) Provision for security patrol of the shopping center at lea1, three times per evening, seven days per i ek etween the hours of 10 :00 P.ti and 6 :00 A.1I., by a licensed private patrol` + perai or. y `f (20) Trash collection shay) occur between the "nours 'of 9:00 kM. And 10:00 P.M. daily. - t2l) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. (22) The entire site shall be kept free of trash and debris at all times,r and in no e7ent Oall ° trash and debris remain for more than tdanty. four J24) hours. /. (23) All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards, which shall be incorporated icto the lease agreement of all- +Auants: � ij (a) Eloise Levels. All All commercial act �" ies jl `hall not create any noise that id , f exceed an exterior noise lavel of AWBA during the hours of 10:00,P.m. to \�00 A.M. and 66d8A: during the Tours of 3 „O(Y A.M, to 10:00 P.& (b) LoadJng and Unloading. No person shall cause the loadikg, unloading, opening, eloskg, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or similar objects between the hours of 10 :00 P.M. and 7:W A.M., ;- unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a. noise disturbadce to.a residential area. ,- Id r (24) The Conditional Use .vermIt shall be the . governing document for the approval cf ,16ra Vista Town Center. Development Review $7,39 shall be considered null and void. Engineering Di•ision (1) The existing overhead utilities + teleconication and electrical, except for the. 65 KV electrical) on the project side of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Foothill Boulevard to the first pole off-site north of ; TOwp Center- Drive. prior to ptblic'Improvem+ent acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs ” first. The development may requeii�;- r / reimbursement agreemer,2 to cover one -half t ' i I{ differ en qq between th,%,undergrounded cost 0 ' \\ i PLANNING C'"ISSION AESOLUTIQN NO. RE: CUP 88 -12 - WESTERN PROP. april 13t 1988 C }, 1 ofethe street min" thos j (telec nications) s previously undergrounded on the opposite side of the street. l 'The (2) fwllotOg 4tians of the Master of _Plan 5to n Draihs shall,* be constructed h the development, L ;y ai line 1 -1 from beer Creek Channel to Spruce Street; b) Line 1-2 from Foothill. Boulevard to Town T Center Drive; and c) Llne 1-3 from Footthiil Boulevard to Town Nn_ter Drive (3) Drainage easements for the portions of the [ Master Plan of Storm Drains not located in public streets shall ,Pe rovidt'i prior to the issuance building of penafts. (4) Traffic signals shall be, constructed at the following locations with, the : ability to coordinate timings prior to occupancy of any buildings: ` a) Spruce .venue and Foothill Boulevard) b) Spruce Avenue and Town Winter Drive; c) Haven avenue and Town Center,,Drive; and M stain Entrande (opposite Aspen Street) and Foothill k\VAovard. (5) The entire expense of constructing the traffic signal at the Main Entrance (opposite Aspen- Street) and Foothill Boulevard shall be the responsibility of the developer. The developer shall receive credit and a reimbursement from the Systems Development Fee i.f approvrd barKthe % - __City Council for the other signals. > (G) The folle"ing streets shall be constructed full Width to include curb and gutter on both sides of the street. Sidewalk, street lights and . parkway landscaping beyond the project boundary be deferred AML may until development of the adJace-n-t -�property: a) ;spruce Avenue Lfrom Foothill 8oulcvard tu.LL'-✓` -_ Elm Avenue; and PLAUNINB C"ISSION "AES6LUTION NO. ! RE4- CUP 89.12 - iESTERN PROF. April 13,, '1988 - Page bi Town Center., Drive, from Haven AveWe- to C Spruce Avenue . t7? The apPropriategines of s g at ali`�driveways shaTl be platted an the landscape plans and the lan6ceping designed so that, clear, Gnobstructed lines of sight~ar,e presoot. to the, satisfaction of ''the City engineer ark City €, Planner. i3. the Deputy Secretary to this Comission si+ell certify to`the t adoption of this Resolution. i,. APPROVED fND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DRY OF APRIL, I98R. PLANNING C60ISSION OF THE CITY OF RAK14 C UCX4WA BY., T I rry T. VCMfeF,-Zh-a-i—rm&R 1! ATTEST: Brad a ir, ti I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by' the PlanolAg Coipes.gfian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at 0- Teguler ;oeeting of the;Planning Comkission held on the 13th day of April, 198b,,<V the following vote- to -witz AYES: COMISSIONERS. NOES; COl+iN9ISSICRS: ABSENT: COhMdISSIONERS: C _ , i Mp� O V 4 J •' D suit -- M. Y MM Vt- lot its- tial 10 f -1 .4 ItItiTL falz 11-1 f: �Zjjr d 96 Ly�� N yM 3'N itti� l... al�''� '�s�,L� �4 ��•, N P �iY �� VMY sp yg� 8�R j.EpppCY t o N.S Asia, wt b N M N y 4P _ Yi4' a M ..s W° *� a 11c's -a � �. YEN M 1�R jM�Nii M+en v. :gg $ ♦ get :. � $++L��" i$. q p.. M �ay� `iiti • K �C Mq. an li N) .1p� �9L �. ISE 34 w $" Of is :6= � S�� M a�.�?�� it IN- ~" u `"� y .. 1 i "SH) w ^�� M to - YL� A6Y NJS b.i •vA •. S W�� i] 4+�q�N{u list lit It MW a �pKaTi Q^y4 wT, Ib xG '" 31,51 —i% q�{yi � `xr K6'.� tCQ�M\`xb.. Y >+K� 44Oiq w '^ M 6 r.Yw.�C' ��°f°"'v„y' Y4 Rf'i ii. •4 rt 1` t1+riMN3}9 {ii wi M'64{.C.w. ��C1 y,N M iCG /i.6f4 V YK>r �.. #Mit YIK hw.K'f�4b 111 T—t Z. V d e a$ w�'� �i.�.: �Z a,rvsa �t �� ^SSX''''+v�. �.NN•a'� �YY�a e . �� +� �.'i ytiTl rsLL` ^ti►^�� .r oo�.wry v� + w N �^ f.MNYI�Y�9 as tp- J'� _{ # all F -�x9R� T� KM Vr+w C -' t utN �.f`�+C �� °. yY� site, 'C+`� <i�'°• ��. #(M4 ' a In..� it a/.pt, v 9 *ogS § C ^ .. +y Y' q.1[S ... �§ �, A0M _`f t N ch �V .# q K T f` 4� ! � V~ 6 ar � J� L ✓k �° C a t N�� N =�� „FRN 3 CK `M tl +�i� _Y iYa. Y Y1y qA Y � N �I lMi MYq J+ i M' aCY� Y Qm NM w L`rltq L'Yb �1ii� `, ^ `gyp Y _ rrt c: w az 6 `± lf. � a i 1, �QpTLbf 4�. eN 4 + i & M ~ N + Y cri N y'1' .31 ' + mk° 0 ��oc (q} s roN u. C5 $ I S^N Sl '.. L 4 �Yi f Y ic�'Q y3 +1 ~�� Cw+ Y y` + M�p.�+ C.0 .i6 Yw Il.y�� +� <��... 3pV LY 'X tt +G L Swgc, Y�w GI �4C�yyry LO C^, +YN V fV kY( L Y �e {,. Y yy to 4w D Ka+w Y. KOit weN G <C �O —7 �Q 4yrS iii. x��i�M�Yoq . ^t C V+R CSrfrt �Y.,. a+ ai us .. YR1� MyK]q .- MMYy. l ✓a 17,'r =..� �...a. ♦ ♦'� -wry; .:�H ta. S yz0 +yam YG 4 w Y _ i.$t U -ill 3 .9-19 ~w �H ^' O #I % $ Al ZZ RNA 11. is- w i ' Iwy, sJIM TecsQ a y ''pV Sk p0 yip$ µ k pp , W$ VV4Naav iY 3;j M - j .-2 'J IJ 56 1 4�4Y. KY4i L t7f L Baas �.. }? 'list M f v ^aa's Pat Div Add, �iZsw+7 HIM N Atha : I I' 318 1 as is H I. G x y0 �`". q jI w,w x g. t•'� YYd • i L ¢!,y L1 I..M 40.7 p „yrix: .�N go �7�C r++ Q %1 i/yi 4. y�ro ,, �' .. ~q�o� S �S� a _`� 1}�i #2iw YM YpMY r.sj„c 19tw �Cr �y3 f Y• ayPt FC'� N,G V ✓ vi N�+i J 6 ��':i�w #.,6,. .K4 ,G V K1KU t0.{.Y. oil 0 1 � �� Z cts d rFy R g lag CQ 3 '' yyey 4 NO 'ag� as b a fl? o $ y Y x °fig t NEIM. N N r Kra g� s � # a A' -- :fig& ; e w fur ung+' mg y�,a tea» y Y^ tt0 YC,y N ~Gw � 611 N _cc6 _p 4 f1px +� Cuj� p;4' "m qw IL " ~Y � ■y y 4��g`ggN CNCD ♦ dO n LCta.M wY L.' Q�. w HA 7 Q O Lo `•,: WAV WVV G t7a G= yirsm`L 7 P Ln �t ff`oa� V y�• M s �~ itp z� y 8 JI a- M $1 MM N q N �uu w. 7F c k K $ ti A6 r •! ii �t•�M� r+. r - —y f'it 4 w Mfi ��Y. KSi f'ds� L�� r �y. M sw U.i .. all Y 0 »O Si G 1Yw ; 6 v� KPRNW 4Z a- M K K i q N �uu w. 7F c k v ,Ai ti A6 r+. r - x I N It _ Y x� N it- t wM V+Rq K'A yr as `1 e= v .1 H �y. M sw U.i .. all Y 0 »O Si G 1Yw ; 6 v� KPRNW 4Z a- M K K i q N �uu w. 7F c k v ,Ai ti A6 r+. r - x I N It _ �y. M sw U.i .. all Y 0 »O Si G 1Yw ; 6 v� KPRNW 4Z a- M �qA yp� i✓ q , it vn c k A6 m� w� s r w 4 J!ry t „r. r R » Y Y %w fit a 4�M 4 � M y 3 W Y$ �V f » L�i ��V♦ W v I�Y� �� -.01— A L. Y V C �` NNN ii' �� • N M M S� t w i44p V�/ Cii y sp L ti q 6 vVp. ` »r•M I LJ JS. iG2f. M W; MY OF IUN (IF O CLrCAMOb MA � OCA DATE: April 13, 1988 � U c: 77 TO: Chairmn and erg, df.Ahe Planning tssfa.ft .Brad Sutler, City Planner wHissen. Assistant Planner llSJ£CT: 1RDFM£t31AL„ ASSESSMENT'` -- TENTATIVE TRAIT 13103 - M A71W UEYELUFRENT -re uWTVI °s on ata e,, 7ev ew or a sing family lots on 11 acres ttf Und in Wn- Medium ResidentIO. District (4.3, dwellingr:4j;j €ts pier' J'' = ` acre), ,1 uc ted, mi the west side: 3f E ,ven MnR4 north of Wyam Street - 'APN:' 201 -19157 aad Y Pt OMIUT iM SITE DESCRtPTIONc A. A.":tion Rsweste3i' Approval of the suhdivis pn map„ Site, Plan, f' e.e" evat on c �` - . teal_ grading Pian,,.afid t*smwe of N Negative - Declaration. " Y , 3. :pro act Densityc ' ,0� wel ;ing units per .acne. C. f� "su - O'u_ nd°i. vi Land Use and Zonina: sv nTriT y s dd L ,r -R urA ii nsitz- I Residential - units per, acre) frith $nl BernarIxna aunty Flood COntx "oi District retention sin; Mond Cnntroi East Haven ,Avenue ano 0, affey Coll L*-Madikm Density Resident:ll (4 -8 dwelling units pea acre) ", West - Single Family Residential, Low d'�ium (mnsity Residential t4�8 dwell-f- units per ray D. General Plan Designations: ro ee + nsi'ey Residential ,448` dwelling pp units per acre) J} Borth - Low - tedium C city Residential (4 -a dwelling units par acre) Sou<h - Parks East . r Civic /rom.unit, West Lox45aaittm Density Residenti;,,,"! (4- dwelIIng €lJt5 > pet` acre) a' w. ITEM K �. v CC I$3toN 1,ZtPw ?$ T G pEA iT J l y, V April I.., 1908 t Page 2 ) E Situ C' amracterfstics: 'Phe site is currently vacant 4114 gapes' 1 'prox eta e y pei a frost north ttr south. the proj�ct site s; a y �s IteUngu1sr, in ,sh, a end vegetati(m is Limittl to 'native " ed5 find gasses piths »tered �'hrsh,rrentsy, • ;tl s4op6 exists 'ion tire' ro Orn bmrIry df the Project �rlsich U r�.3ulted from gradfrg of the Northwcids X04 p►4ect to the north. tOo '- construction of 7ract '13703, certain portions of the sl4` * will:, either � removed or expanded with a retaining' wail coh,tructod st .'thg� A. Oenerai e p Jot :s 4roposlft to develop 5S'Ots ranging rr s ze £"roe X" Wroegh 11b468 square •feet. _ The avoige lot size within. iite �= ract will be 0,,Crtal C-71 a fast. Three floor plans "P :�of#�j Proposed for the f poptct with +!i_h of the #ton► pukes havt jig ' Mree' elevations. Each ,of the elivati4ns., is mediterranptaa id character. Plprt 1 {a ing�Ee et rs +yi#lt 1,668 s�:ara f tit attd is provided f �;e times ' ,.f ar, 'Is-'a :, n�story unit wii�.h'1,902 square feet and is\ptvy1ded=t3 ti;Ks. i'lan 3 is also, a 'try unit with,Z,237 's ar€ feet .:ktid is Provided 28 times+ B. Trails Advisor C ttteor j Advisot:V C ittee � rvi�are a project aria ±seconded app"oval,,subject to th foti L P.rovice a k2 foot w+de COestrian'*rail alpng hays Avendii in addition to a a' foot si ratx -,and � a 4 400`. wide Iand�!apn' parkway Ci.e.' a s=tandard 20 foot parkway ::aloi 4 lia *wen kr�n�e3. "A 1ity V07 ,locatred in the'F'locd 'Contr�at_ istr basin' °to , sAaaO shatcld_ be cimpleted tract. C. t design_ Keview dines: The CoWtter. iEmeri�,;� %tstoy r 77� aiTy revue d the pT W*ct on ,December 17, isg� At t4s #r, ! ee"tfng, •tlte Cmmittee deteratined that t:ne piroject was not acceptable in the fo'liowin'aease i L An g',lpaadsd parkway ;`.fan t "e 20 feet ; \\ l PTOP1 :4 4 aicng Haven A -le" a tt oulo be pr'avided, ,," �.. l =o ! oaai ite� tdiGated tf would Me to see 5o y ti N :mkt Al 0119 t northern and of the site bta ;that ' feet miq�t be acceptable alon th11;0 -ern f i r 1/ c l clue to 'site constraints., a :�xpafded }� ° r, 'was„ semi nded due to popsy $g ants:, t (3etkeraY ' t�lan {e which call fob the � F Year.>rw —Y ° s.rca, / r • %' �W VVVV'"'___��`__ 3�� .. �. 7 C Pta1NHUG C l' $SION STAFF RVOPT TENUTYVE TRACT 13703 -?KAJI April 13, .1933 E Page " "preservation of open 0aractee and "ayoida,� e of grading in fire areas surrmn4ing. ��ey College�nd forecon'inuation of the V er: sp /e pf f the ldorOwoods Rapth aroJect - 2. ProvidcO wrought iron fene, nor, and additional, nds'.ag ing at the end of eacO of the cul -&— - sacs. 3. Provide -an snobstructed distance of at least�,to 10 - feet b(tf.;-een .? • e Side of each i5ouse aryl slaer IQ_, ,. of reta#rr�4 �wa s to ,tire ( horth. TtWf utni t distance d °ro� the south side-'of the houee to the top of: ttr ^- diacent Siopj. should also be a �iniratnrr' wr�i•:�re fc;�t. *' .. �. the homes bleated along the southern flier of lots should be 0 feet frim the scree; -wall rather than the. -5 feet proposed. . ri revised pVo,iec,, was On °presented -te, thp, Design �,�evlew Coaerittee (Chittea j FACr?ck Kroutil) on Marbh 3, 1988, r this pri,pasal `decreased the ntb2�r >of lots from 60 to ,a6 andn most areas ' met. the eonctrns> of the,,, ;previc is Desion REview Conaittee. Wrought iron fencing agt -well au additional tree. piand:ng in'an expanded area (16 feet vs. 1t= *cet ori-ginalty proposed) has now been proposed at the end of each of the cul� 14-sac i. , An unobstructed distance of at ?east ,Il ve feet has been -provided a' l —r-* yardu except for 6 :out-!9f the 5 lots. In addition, the iwr; located on the southern tier of lots are now set back 10 'feet from the southerly pei!�neter wa11, rather than the 5 feet +brf? nalty proposed. p The ,. Comn;ittee "recomme'rded ar}provai of 11 ect SW W.' ' 1 11tQ apprica `,should revise the �.avery Avenue cr ass section ' to reflect an actual Cmmnity 7;�ail section rather than a` typical s�tion. apniicant has provided this in their revised- submittal). 2. Upgrade the south elevation of the dwelling on Lot 3 and in general provide some type of .; arch`ttecturat-Vetailing oft all elevations. 3. Provide,�some type of ,textured entry p ►e>Aent"on , the main �; riot enter,�g , the prr.Ject. (The, - apph &tt- has indicated This Cenceptual La.nd3cape Plan). \\A Pt AFEttING COW - ISrSIM STS � " REPORT � TEHi'ArIVE Ti%VT 1x)03 - KAJIMA r April 13 149b (7. j s Page 4 4. The perimeter wall a�logg Haven Avenue should be consistent with the development ;iqz°diately t� , > the nol *th and should curve wnepe, meets th ®i southerly ., pevtoeter. wall,. The '1Mitcee' f -i recommended this be reviewed b$' the ,full Commission. (The applicant has - -turved the southc-an portico of the will where it intersects the south perimeter wall.' in addition,:1ha wall at the '��try, corner has beep moT?ed westward 16 fee } = �._�tor from Haven Avenue than the' original proposal). j s. The Haven Avenue parkway has been expanded to s0: feet north of the project entry &n14 to 30 feet South of the pn+JO -� erstry. thi pee +ay contains a 1Z foot aedicattd Community Trail and a 4 foot sidewalk.. Beyond the stdtwalk and trail Is a 30 foot landscape easement north of use project 'entry. The portion along Haven Avenue south -.of thu project entry, hbs beep provided with a 10 feat landscape easement. _ Due- to the significance of Haven Avenue and t$ t rox m r ' ha rey � ,re v's . Of � e u ss i any B. Gradin�Co ittiie: The pf,Qject was or�;ginally review��it by tfi rla adY'�ig Z, "on .: eNdser 14, I981. At then time. th^ Committee did not recommend approval due to the lac of required retainlFg in walls side yards, amount of elevai ion change heti+ilen,;adjicent pads, and aesthetic concerns along the WA,_ Avenue 'street =ape .due to extensive -ull slopes and re:;ry� walls. 'Me redesfgno; prdwect was presented to the Gradinn- Committee on 1i kmh 14, 1$38, The Ct *ittee did not recommend approval at thin =time and suggested that Lots $7, W 3g,'and 40,.!e lowered in :ardor to ,p iandscape maintenance difftct� `tries n the Aope MJacent tc' :iirerwood Plate* The comments fret the Qradina Committee were incor orated into 4 the n, a redesign an �iie r�ro ec was approve on r Mr t _� E. Environmental Asses nt• Staff has completed , the nv ronmsn'a Tfi�s "'and ,ec" found no significant,,, adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project." If the 7. ?1.r.ining Commission concurs with these findings, iouance of a Mgc itive Declaration wain,, be approprike ff the tentative tract -map is approved. PGAN5IIN0 CO MISSION '=TAFF REPORT N sENTATIVE TRACT 13703 .. KAJIMA April 13, 1398 Page, 6 T III, FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project, is consistent with the General Pan Ana Xne. Ova .topment Code. 'The ro3ect, With the addeO mitigation measures, will net be detri*en to the public health or safety, or cause nuisance or signif ant environmental impacts. In addition,..the prorfsed use d Site Plan, together whir the recommended Conditions of App oval, are, in compliance With the applicable provisions of the De 7OPMent Code and.City standards. Id. CORRESPONDENCE: This step: has'een advertised af.; =) public 'k". n e +� , rt r►ewspakr a gotices were sent to all y' " "rty 4 owners w n _ eefof the pr Jt,;ct si, "te. V. RECCW[ENDATION: Staff reco;4ds that the Planning Coxatista: conduct a nu ic hewing to consider public input and' the ,;oven 1 Avenue parkway widih and perimeter wall design, If,z after such consideration, tha CotfSsion can support the required findings and t finds that parkway width and wall design' acceptable," then adoption of tha attached Resolution wxsuld be appropriate- If the Commission finds the parkway and wall design unacceptable, thi4.item should be; continued with the :applicant's ,cons@o,. Staff' should t�Yer be j directed to work with the applicalnt any retur% the p*43ect to the - Design Review Ccmmittee, .Should °ihe_appl,icant not consent:.-to this, staff should.; be° directed to 'prepare "A Resolution of Dermal to to ? brought back before the Planning Comission at their next Ming. IR ful Bul a r :te" Attachments Exhibit "A " - Tentative Tract/S' t£' 's1n Exhibit "6" - Conceptual Grading PldeF _ Exhibit "C" — Grading Plan Sections Exhibit "D ": Conceptual Landscape plan Exhibit "f" Building Elevations (j Resolution cf ,, ppro l with Conditions )J) / /if /. � � .••fin •' f ♦ 1 � � •T 1.1.�� Am IS`��.},rA, ;• .y t, �� I •C 'tJ.11, i,I 'rl (0 ' s �� j 1 �.�.k �� 9 � CITY, i C UC , INUNG EXVLS t rgAi r I] to" IWO 'aaO,iln x It 'I'� jlA.t '. yL/:/�N.' W� b1 /".Gvp •��r�1'd °"'.dsF WNW" CITY N-17Y CL u Trl TLA'�Nl, EXHIM�i, «tw 1 r,, a _ t ..�RSU+i1Aa AV {� u • RAL, Rue HtZ Kos es I •/ riw1s�� ►..w p,.wyyai•n Ir.�a �uu.� "w �v� 1 we raw WE fir, rAroua pw � I •v � ice/ '�,� � wYa�e.+•• �...+ ��, �4� E�� :..•.a, ate- N. CIT, + L-117? RANCHO CCU. Tie > 'v';vt txV 1 H . E ��;� `- L - SC ALE- 9 ___.,..ter -= ""�_-- __ -�,-• -<'" VO Lr WI it 1 jE s� Oil;; Uf Hill Nit 0111; OF iTF1= T �► P " (1, ;D "-L Models (3) E N,� STREETSCAPE LANDSCAFE SUBJECT To HAVEN AVE. REPORT PLANT LIST MOM SEAPATA SAWy1 ZILKOVA ` �uF1R'J8S l.6APANTM*$ AFR;ZANUS ULY- OF- 70116-NCE �± MWROCAWS W. DAY LLY 4AORAEA *V;O % fbRT"WiT ULY RRPHftSM'ACK RVPyd' woo" "Awl Ic GRCiM COVERS QAZANNA'5UNGLOW (7i�111N0CA2A" LANTANA S.MNTEVXXN$ 41 HYDROEEEWD Ttmw •- s, 891Cigi13.t *.W .MANT" 4 0,.0rejAii TIAI. 41 ACING l AM) WIMAI f a.'ii�,KWl1�r I z —TEXTURED BTREET PAV*4 AT ENTRY l 1 WIRY MO W '1mG , TYR CITY OF, t,, RI� C€,.Jd.+t'7�a'!'r r .. C l'` i 'i '1 1 ttl �t ttl Sfr tlx.# t" Tll1l� ttfF it 1 t �t1I ..•• „�� Iit11 "s y j! ,art r nt f# ►►�-,� iii i r ATE jA5v,JFU"7vm7A/!:; C OF L., r C pl 0701 -0 o4-13-88-PC Agenda ZLF of 6 K a 1 4 .n A11i1�'•� ': Wa � ' lkl!} all nar i ♦ti `r� {MM .,, r F' �t ik, T; mat no k i 1 � �� ' ,.91 i CY'.11Y.lix F! T€ E qi® FXHIB T. A774- SCALE, r r k �... p [A , P�m rile k 1 %fu, :c'ITY CF i RESOLUTION `W. . A RVOLUTION OF THE PLANNING . CtViMISSION OF 1"dE qT! QF FAHCHO CUCNOW APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 13703; A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. AND'OESIGN REVIEW OF 66 SI1Md FAMILY LOTS ON 11 ACES OF LAND IN THE LOW- MEDIUM (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, - LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEM AVENUE, NORTH OF BANYAN - A,PH: 201- 101 -67 AND 68 A. Recite .*'; f (i) Kajima 'Development has f174a' an application for the approval of Ter�tavive Tract Map No. 13703 , as described `in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Rem iuiior, the subject Tentative Tract Pap request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 13th of Apriy, 1988, the Plann3ng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga cn;tducted a duly noticed public hearing on the annlication and con hided id h . � y i; -cr s cw is u, � �aFiFl� VFI tliQt Rt1LCs (iii') All leg& ,prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by ti:2 Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. ' This Commission hereby specifically finds that, all of the facts aet forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 13, .1.988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the west side of Maven Avenue, north of Banyan w{th a street frontage of 630 feet along Haven Avenue and 796 feet along the south tract boundary and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated for residential uses and is 'developed with single family homes, the property to the south of that site consists of the San Bernardieio County Flood Control retention basin, the property to the east is Ghaffey College,,and the property to the west is designated fir single family residential and 1% under construction. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Ccmniision during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Con -rd ssiort heresy finds and concludes as follows: PLMMING- COWIS31ON RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13103 - KAJIMA April 13, 1988 Page 2 (a) That tentative tract is coktsistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvene `s 'of the tentative tract is tan istent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The side is Pkf'4ically suitah <e for the type of development proposed, and M The design of the subdivision is n t likely t ' cause substantial environmental;,, damage a avoidable injury to humans ani' wildlife or their habitat, and tel The tentabiue tract is nst-'likely to cause serious, public health problems; and ,.. M The design of the tentativ;j tract will not conflict with any easement acgpjret by the public At largr� now of record p fon° access through or use `,of the propemy within the subdivi9or. 4. This Comr4ision hereby finds and certifies that the .pra3ect has been reviewed and c�sidered in compliance with, California Eevironontal Quality Act of 197(( and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Ne live Declaration.' 1� ; S. Based- 4ion the f�,ndings and conclusions set forth iai garugrap#n i, 2 and 3 above, this o� -01on hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth helm and its the attached! Aandard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated he by this referne. Tract Map 1330,3 (1) A twelve foot dedicated Cunity Equestrian Trail shall be provided on the west side of iiaven Avenue and shall connect with the trail provided by Tract 10827 -1 to the north, (2) The COWO"ity, 'Trail located within the Flood Control District basin to the south shall be Completed with this tract. (3) Are in -lieu fee as contribution to the future construction of the medtan island witAin Raven Avenue shall be paid to the pity prior to ISC-- of building permits or recordatiah of tF,e final map, vat ic;tever Occurs first. The amount of the feel shall be the City adopted unit amOturt for Phase III times the linear feet of property fronting on p4w,%j Avenue (*629 feet).' (4) The portions of chipped curb and existing curb cuts along Haven Avenue shall be removed and replxicad with standard curb and gutter. (5) The traffic signal at the intersection of Haven Avenue and huber Lane shall be upgraded as approved by the City Engineer. A pemit shall be obtained from the San Beroardina COUntY Flood Control District prior to construiftfon of the Comunity Equestrian Trail alonar the south !roJect boundAry er the City's, Comm Use A reement Alta Lcma 190nz . 2 ( OT Contract!bo, 86489,. (7) Permfsslan shall also be obtafted frow -=RD to dischargla storm drainage to ther extstfig *utlet' ' 'as structure in the basin. if, deterAined by the final dulinage study, the,existing facilitiet are to be rezoved ind replaced, "-th* d6igii of these facilities shall be approved by the nood-Ctnt�uj District and the Ot Engineer. (8) The Alta "Loma Bas,4n, IMAP,5 immediately south of J titis site shall be exctvAtiii to provide sufficient storm�,water, retentioa to offset the increased rinoff gener�ted by the, dtvelopment. (9) A landscap6;easement adjacent to the pcblic street riqht-of-�Ay shall be, provided alonj Haven Avenue. (10) The off�lite portiont of Lots, 38, 39, and 40 (Lot "No of Tract 10827-1) shall be acquired prior to, appvoval of-the timal map. ,Desiun Review (1) The south elevation of Atte dwelling on Lot 3 shall, be upgraded with architectural detailing- (2) Additional architectural treatment-,, such as stucco river wood, shall be provid�d on all elevations. (3) Textured entry pavew.n*, -shall be prbvf(Wd at the main entry to1he pro,�dct. 'Ibe type and'Yocation of the pavement shall b4� shown' en the:final landscape 'be plarts, which shall reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the 'Issuance of bu,, ding Pernits. The miatelIal shall also be revieiied and X, 'by approved the City Engineer for structural intelrity prior to the issuance of building permitg, a y �g ttt •y I x 3 f 3 its a ' •� N .fir, ��A A � y4 NAW:IA�°y��"4 Y N vz �• � f� � •Y �r. � to �A' L p R W N i+ -�f. VA S ..�:. K4t � 1. f. � t. � • rl�� f /rte-' ... � r� -'�•_ Cam j� �Y • • ` � `Y �S •�� ' US X. HE W25 e" _ 444 ti ZZ rkg r °S YMy.11 ail us W m Ct N ar 6 pp � L w•6� ra aM� �!q I CC ffM11 g ` CC M i lit H • u wl l�, C�p 'r� 6 F �■ � �wp+ �r.,y N6 wytl eQ{' LIRE. +Np M1 ° �5�� It IL 4,11 SIR I m aw=ei Pr a ° °° v im w ft 16231 231 • r V c W �aV gj.� :' Yp� �y«t° gJ,�jr ty,. �y. L.i•wNM�••w +0 ��^C�ff�� +�q^,a y°� tl d 6 • eQyNy � 4 C� ,yiC� V`Q 1� .6 �ApaE p1r sij_ 7yi!!� 'b1S ��Mgt NQayy� vpM�i $?ate �g #QC ,. e4 • a.r`�`.« �. Na,,. CB.4a"'.'4. - a +-- R $ 9L�/'jWdwr �LN WFj.r •L YYrY �C_,s AU I•A it 4 ire to, E g !J 2.4 S�+N Nrk �U .,{M4M+wChY rG y V a 6~i d ollu#r . Quality coo �^a••�R�o•y°N•^oL"ib'd� lei y� ••� •0 Yw � •�iw Tp SA � a .O W ps N � �� N•N� Y' �� Ka��v p.. V�QO �� pQ �w C��aN• ^M�� „` L M IC. AY �i^N• V kN a AN V w al �A �N • � � V� y pw Od�4 g' 9I g C �j •w I Cr. ;�t�•,� .•. � Y � Yr� y iN4 F a .<7i � Vl 4 Y•• 1 ! HIS 5 s � ` w N s w _g Zw ww A w MIN, ti A� ( i HIS ,lei 16 C 10,4 T-,e -ii wC "w v V('IV UYY t�9 Y � j' P�0.�. �I yl'•'� �� i! '�� ;•N ^9�� Y �c ,•cam{. �� O.N ,,¢f r ��t V y F1� � w any � ®'a Y R. Ow N0 •� M~ yy Q.4 L1� lls qlpi ezu a ^�'•�. VC; w - w _1YC Yi spLif , >` a�ry•4. +.�.CYr Y.ec.A -K'ON P'•GN <V ¢49 Ke CNV.A 4 '(� ail Q.w .Ryq •^YV• � �qw CC a O w�a y N _ �tj YyyLa �fi •`gq�;j �r_w {MMY pY w t. • 6p 4 C bV�! p O C.•. N If Q♦b Mw• HIS 5 s � ` w N s w _g Zw ww A w MIN, ti A� ( i HIS ,lei 16 C 10,4 T-,e -ii wC "w v V('IV UYY t�9 Y � j' P�0.�. �I yl'•'� �� i! '�� ;•N ^9�� Y �c ,•cam{. �� O.N ,,¢f r ��t V y F1� � w any � ®'a Y R. Ow N0 •� M~ yy Q.4 L1� lls qlpi ezu a ^�'•�. VC; w - w _1YC Yi spLif , >` a�ry•4. +.�.CYr Y.ec.A -K'ON P'•GN <V ¢49 Ke CNV.A 4 '(� ail 0 n I N� y ti iS g r C 3�Ve1 �Y+jC y6 y AY _.N ^x� O raa l �w Tit M V. � x M _ i r ,!ppu�rc miss ,,, Ili!, an, S' ra ±�$ e: N` !i° „'^i N Sa 'i ,:eR 3 ro -D -ts 4pC lip m- 154 .{�y� y pV •4.L .j Yt,O. 'G �Wy'.4 sa. �'�w• 3, � �e aaa�` N.Q�yd p, .�a ~Gq L�N7'w ��a �e g ■�. 6��p 7-i 4 L Nit .. v S �►1e' Nr�.a 4 r C RL �i1t�e V. C CiR y! MMM IAi�• Kam.` �) �� IC� wC•. �i � �y pw �' «�6P � ��. �ipf icy Yi. a.A N� ',dy�� N �a �y �6cC! {y�� r 12 45 i, MM C ^' =M .�i :.., SGaMR L._ d(� �1 kG LZ fI ), _ M � st r=. T i �= - Ea 12 YM `` 6N■ N bite a Y M ' Sit .�'i7 V a? g' O{.3 w r N f m a¢� A3 L� M w tw Ng o s 2-1 i0 .w ti wl m p Y AO A d L11r M Gn N� QM {{bb yyggee C b y V 'Y Sall 3 u sill F, ag—T �' w O -202 9 Ij ��ii M ilgg % 6� `� w� � lit Fpp1tl1 i L'ra ■Y sr 1 Ito S AP• '($y`t�,tN^ �r het Q y i w 3" lKs g µ pp piy+{i pp 4 '� NN �.Yy v$ir 4rJ r.liwu <.dsu «�-.N. Qi i a u l l � ,yyW N� 0 ZA bll M r� �84w ss��yy5� s:2 1 Sall 3 u sill F, ag—T �' w O -202 9 Ij ��ii M ilgg % 6� `� w� � lit Fpp1tl1 i L'ra ■Y sr 1 Ito S AP• '($y`t�,tN^ �r het Q y i w 3" lKs g µ pp piy+{i pp 4 '� NN �.Yy v$ir 4rJ r.liwu <.dsu «�-.N. Qi i a u It "it as 111 gun w 0 Is lit -t sipx w N ,.Ray# zsa~ Tfl'�1n sg g i,. i►ia �. Al us M .tom. g 'CA" lb 96 « +- a . issr w Lo _w qj rl„ CH I -, � -li j !*r i =- � ; oa � sit 1 t ko I N gs Y Y �Y Y i N N Niti tTj � 4Q Y Wl 4 pp Tfl'�1n sg g i,. i►ia �. Al us M .tom. g 'CA" lb 96 « +- a . issr w Lo _w qj rl„ CH I -, � -li j !*r i =- � ; oa � sit 1 t ko I N ._ t w � r q N we Lys' a$� s4 O� - J 9 Y f w ow o g` Lwl gv " C4 3 »�, ECM WW 16wsl a yy C e i M 4 L. C0 syL M �Ii� psG eg *r o r« H \iV. *: i iL� N�yL �ytll: OL Y,�,u NL 2w .1 N 3� rL Y� A N 1 ^CSe �Q y�y � LC w v w °l►�i 4. i =-. a Z. >� . Lu•a. 8 a a °- �t vase H•! �.,M �1uw a�w y n{NLi w Y4,� yII yIO!�gg +N'.�ii r!e RCN. NM )� 4W.GP VIL i1 dNvN i- V S196 j.vas V ~C. GAS a�uodw.'�, a. & it o P I ` I ! 11 14, Chairman and W-vk ors of the Planning Commission FROM, William Silva, 01puty City Engineer CYs Walt Stickney, 4scoiato Civil Engineer ,y• 4 SUBJECT: Vacation of Pedestian Access Easement Request located-, between La Paz Court and Avalon Street, ('Tra &ts 12930 a�tb 1272E3 ' -- 1 I. BACKGROUND: Seven property owners residing,on La -Paz Court and La Mancha Drills (Exhibit )V) .have requested tkw City vacate t� pedestrian `ecc"' s portion of a 2f f� t;)wide eorgency vehicular' access, pedestri'm access a . drainage 4�tiseMent which ,;etas dedicated to the City wits, Tract XR 36. The easement is located at the northh' end of °tht, La Paz Court zul -de -sac and aligns with a privately owned lot in the Hamilton Ranch subdivision (Tract 12726) over which an basement for evergency vehicular /+scw, pedestrian access: and ��inage was reserved ky the owners unto Oemselves. On September 12, 1984, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tray* 42796 which .ailed for a connection from the proposed i.-tct to ¢x4s`'ng Avalon Street on the west project boundary. This woi► _v �e %, two deans of primary access to and from the 1 devb._ r one °ai Beryl Street to the east and one to Carnelian Street" w Ahe west via the Avalon Street connection. During'�,the Septembukr 12, 1984, meeting, the Planning' Commission reviewed alterrativeg,:to the the proposed connection to Avalon Street, One alternative provided a annectioo to &::future tract to the south. Another was to provide a connection leading from the tratt by way of Mignooette Street to the north. After reviewing these alternativcrrihe Commission determined that °a permanent means of access was Necessary and that tL%_,mst logical and beneficial eboica Wis to connect with Avalon Streea VA he west,,, On September SO. 1994, an appeal of he Planning Comeiss #ot},' approval was filed by an adjacent property owner on Avalon Strcpt: Among otkzr< things, the appeal was based on cance ms of traffic flow, parkim) and pedestrian safety �n Avalon Street, On November 7, 1994, staff ret °ended to the City Council � the E0 tentative tract be approved a&id the 4ppeal denied. flo" r, by ,, MR L - l� { PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT Vacation of Pedestrian Access 400"At P.equest. _ .. ._ _.... -April- Page 2 memorandum t *be Cf - Council at that tame meeting staff reported that aftonr 6 rmeeting be n thae anpellanti developer and staff, all opposition to the project wouU -be eliminated if„ among other things, the primary ac;.rss point qr. Avalon Street be eliminated and only emergency vehicular, access ee permitted, Council. approved Tentative Tract 1272f;, provided that, 1) a. fire lane, with no pedestrian access be iravided to the `existing ANitlon Straet, and, 2) a separate pedestriar easeererot be -provitind whidh. conn.K.ts the tract to the property ty: the sou�4, -"Inew known is La Paz Court). _ On December 14, 1984, Planning Cow!ssion reviewed Tentative Tract 12830 in >. addition to an alternative ;to thy, nae-ed fire lane and pedestrian a.:cess e0seewnt fit, :3ugritfdn, 7M aiteMative relocated the fire lane in zF nzrth!sorrtti direction a.nd it Frith tilt+ pedestrian access vas to La Paz tl b. This alternar; Ie was I approved with the Tontativa Tract by the Planning Commission. The Tenta�i" Ti4Act 12726 condition itgardt.g the emmergency v ;icmAZ access location was revised to the above -alternative -b7 City 7 Council on January 1a, 1985. , II. AKALYZISa The applicants he -ire expressed concern With the existance of the pedestrian aca;ss. way at the north end of, La Paz Court. 11A their request to the City for the vacation of ;14 access, they reported numermtus accounts of vandalism, from overtnrnod trash cans and> j other littering to theft, distruction 0 private property and . verbal abuse. According to the applicants, the above accourttp are . attributed to the pedestrian traffic, through -the access wry. The applicants' request also states that. the acc"s Day provides a "shortcut" j to schools in the area. The applicants stated that 1`- Hamilton Ranch has an access way oil Beryl Street which has been closed eft by a "crash gate". The. applicants reque a cloture C.f all pedestrian traffic through the access way in gtiNtian. Residents of Hamilton Ranch have IrstwIledf a 'locking gate across f the access tray. They stated that reason for this, action was to comply with. a requirement establfshe4i by the school district. ' involving 'he busing of school children to Carnelian Elementary School. With the access gray left open or riot locked, time 4i;strict would not grcv de busing for students. l'f thmr access had a locking gate or was closed G_lf completely, the district would bu3 the children frmm a buS stop lotatea on Beryl Street. In addition, the Hamilton Ranch residopts have, expressed a desire to maintain a r pedestrian 4"ess za and from Alta ._Loma lii�hk School which would avoid unimproved Beryl Street. Upon review and approve' in IM of Tentative Tract 12726 (l)'aniltnn Ranch), the Planning commission imposed a " oodition to provide q wondary access Co and frolt the southwest. pc, lion of the } PLi4NNIV& OWISSION STAFF REPORT r 'Vacation of Pedestrian Aocess Easement Request aevelo This requlmm"nt was stnet "dif'ied b city Council to Provide a pedestrian access and eule X�CY acce� � � the south RA PAX Court).. Sam residents of Tract 12MO now fad's that � the pedastrfan,: access should be 61101atc . 111. �BEGOs NEHDATIOIts Staff recoe nds that the coaesission hold a public" hey my aril Ptak* a &taT*tMtion �s to the Confortsity of the ,proposal vacation to UM ,General Plain. NI 14 If the P7,4nninq Commission finds canfb r the vacatio est still b* Presented tO the Cit,, CouncIVb.� a path3it army. � i . '-'� bt Planning Condssion finds that t:* apse 4t should L u4inQ4, no further "action will `"be taken t4 City Cc � U4 ass the`- wpl #tartts wish to apps? ::ate plannIny C- Owission s decision. . z, Respectta�i 1 j �SuLwti ed. !Foot,, William J. Silva, P.E. Deputy Ci �;nganeer `1 a Attachment rs .t n 1 �"'F M 441 ol t t K� c n. �;� is Cl f OF 'RANCHO CUCAIV ONGA - DATEv February 22, 1988- TO: File - �• W7 FROM: William J. Silva, Deputy City, Engineer �n , SUBJECT: La Paz Court - Property Owners request 4 abandoned Pedestrian Easement: Summary,of.Property Owners Meting At 6:00 p.m. on Monday, February 22, 1989 City Engineering Staff members, William S#lvA, Deputy City Engineer and alt Stickney, Associate Civi? Engineer co6u5cted are informal meeting wit'�cwnors of property on La Paz court. The Pur,:ose of the meting was to .rovide a for 'for discussion (1) the /,gasement Of Process for abandoning the pedes:Ian access at the north •and of ; ;, � Paz Court, (2) the Issues and eoncernsh of the :property C owners, and 6y1he Reco6andations of the homMeowner$. This am po summarizes the discussions and notes- recorded at that meeting. The disctissilon regarding the abandon p 'Procedures included at description of review by the Planning Commisa'rconsistency with the General Plan relative to vacating and abandoning the pedestrian acess between the H#ilgate subdivision (La Paz Court) and the'�Y?amilton Ranch i subdivision to the north. The City Council hearing process which mould follow the Planning Commission hearing was 'described including the open hearing process, discussion at Council level, and the final decision of the City Council. Staff also explained that advanced notice will be provideds,to all property owners in the vicinity of the pedestrian easement fir hearings before the Planning Comission and the City Council. Staff also l advised the property owners that if the Planning Commission does not agree with the proposed abandonment,, an appeal would have to be processed ;{ to the Ci_tv;. Council. Staff identified the March 23, I98$ . Planning Commmission meei:ing as the tentative schedule for presentation pf.a report ;> regard rnee,_tOgSO /'proceedings. i V4 following briefly summarizes the issues and comments made�by the Property owners: 1. IS this a "one -way street''? Only = he portion of public easement within the Hillside subdivision is open to public access. North of tract boundary the land is owned by the Hamilton Ranch Homeowners Association and is not a pubic easement. 3 `� r 4� COURT '!RY 22, 1988 r , 2. ErrarOncy fthicls 414est A gate is parrsitt }d. The gate would have td be 011 the private peoporty<, gortim of ttm Access easowt ;tal d could bis opened, by Fire District vslae�es � eaatrg�iCy, , 3. ayes N>raitton RiAch taan the public dasevint7 (,They say 'they bought it.) #o, the public ea4s�aarent on the iitllsis'ie f subdivision is & City- easffmt. a - 4. Numbers of p+t'apta affected. Concern that H*J'1't4g Ranch property owii4rs have free across to La 'Paz court whereas property oynt s to the south: do rw t, hay* the sari c p�ivitag�., - 5. Parking -" HaraitU Ranch has , 6t' ox fight pa3;king. Coarplain'G that visions the iiie4iltfn l-Ch subdi" sly use to Paz, court and this str"t$ to the sleuth for _ a�',ci�. 6. Concern over vandalis4' (lit: respect fw - DMvate property.) „ Reports of�'b�d?�eraiI frost boxes, trash and litter" deposited in tf � st"a+►'t art" - and reports of ee th%fts. Pr*Wty owners indicat9d that they cauld, provide.` a c'rpies of police .reports rega;rdifig _soee of these aeidents. f) ?. The liability is of pedestrians. using the public easement as it relatss to the earners of the adjacent 4 property. 8. Could the Nare�lton Ranch Pr opio'ty Viers r+sques,�', abandonment? Yes, they Could apply, for and request the abandonment proceedings. The sme._Pmblic hearings and 1 notice to adjacent property ownOrs would be followed 9 ; If the easomt % ab4ndone4* who Closes it off? jWho does I the work?) Pfti teas identified by City' staff as an item Which would r Uire a dit;ira of budget funds and attomplishment d work by the City, ,(Council Approve . L LA PAZ COURT FEBRUARY 22, 1'88 a AAA► The following rocomi4`tions were Presented k, 'tha property owners relative tO the 00sure o1 . this Pedestrian a#+inwat. 1e Close it off. 2, pen the gate from Hamilton Ranch to Beryl t>ranua. l'. 3. Use the school bins stop on °Beryl Avenue instead of al lfeing` sehodl children to ust' the pedestrian access to La Paz Cot rt, Other. discussion at the Ming in` the nead to w4intain a drainage eas nt thrdugh tho area, of eXi n9l pldt ;t: Batt SAHMahts. The property ownership of the, land szross which the vASANNOt lies is-a public eeatf�nt i { and not a dedle -atod, right-of.-way. Tharefor+t, the ae ,scent p �t , taxes the 041amt Zed' Llrm'e"'�nt Procedures qu estioft he cost of tit pro ii gs and the uses of the Pr�essin praparatidn of yar reports and g �� '� a� .'for publication and preparation of Various noticts .r informtion for hearings. WJSsdlw cc: Russell fl. Maguire Walt .Stickney r- Otto hroutil Scott Murphy v ti � Dr*mber T, 1985► Citation guilders 17'x'31 Irvine Soutward, Suite 201 Tustin, California 92680 RE: Nillgsts Development As residence of is 'Rar Cox, rrt wE am extremely cbncemed with *.he situation in this s5 called Crldesac. \ Wo all paid additionsi mahey i live on a cutee%ac, n*t s nvdn tfwqughfars for eYSry' q- dy in the Area. As stated in the M1lntemationa! Dictionary Wagrall a cutclesac is: � i � onary of 00 English LWWXI a by :Funk Cc! px open only RICO 1E end. You can only drive into it. one �, however, tFte foot trr'fio c0 %n- in both dirsctiom through tha,street None of us were Jnforrrtsd a& t` this fine app that t s „our di I the community behind us, N'' torF iirxrch. illy fral that thisvat a brae `�ri*h lip ml . tatics on the part of Citation 9uittrars. Zf fess this situation is resolved in short �or,, yet may become ! raecessery to take otlher action. Not only is this f"iM accts Wiry A coRsr;arrt source of descemfiats e all that reside here, fart it will greatly affect the value of our properties w k.n we r�cic'.d � sell. . o As You can sae by tl attschee� mama+ there, have i mr numerous problems as a "Wit of this fire access way. c ` / Additicnal money w+es pa: sf fnr a cgi.ieww and thy cutds , , it stands to date we do not reside on a sac, but mearty o deed and street With excessive foot tratfic. Your immediate attention with regard to this matter will be read ' � Y aARt+eciAted. Il pp XH1731 ! [� r ,I 1 i The following is a state nerat'froan the resiiicnce of the Hilt of this complaint pamlins to the fairing of this deve gait Housing QNreiMrtrsent. The thrust �pmant 1 Hamilton Ranch via the Leto with the PRrV'ATF- community of Court cutdessc, This jolninq of the too communities by �� arxe� way is csusi \� gnutnera?uus P ms with the residence of Hill". 7'tse fgltawrrrg is sit' 1 *cc e* of what has fawt traffic using thus fire actalss yr r, mtf! as ratuuit f"tw constarit ' —Numerous type s t►f v aradattadr -: ��Y�}itt tifit ovgr.ttjmod onti? �Ireet fft0�lt porQhes ard into back — l?ltlel residlatee vd "ftlty used when q bards confrcntin tine char lelft behind on a tar g dual; causing She vlisrrt � basis Small chrw ren threatens,*f and asked to give up their toys' —docks twirled at nail Wxft and parkild Kcles -M&il boxes vandalW and m4'kjtoleo (police re- „rt filed,, — Motorcycle type enshicias ridinj -on 'L sidew lks to het to fins wiy :Qogn, go coming into that Community arid relieving our lawns Ives an private propff Parking in Niflgate on La Paz Court to access parties ai Hamilton ��ch, �d then using the front lawns, of the raddenco to urinata 1pgfrt� report fjtedl NOTE: : Hermitian Ranch Akan no facit ties for over night parkjWfor tenants or guestt At tease two ranant, have been verbally abused by re3idanCe of Hamilton .tiaeach whm taking a simple wall', thro igh their PRlV'ATe community ("Got the Hell out”) —As a result': the "O's "If for the fires ACCOM way kids find both ands of the fire access way a great peace to juanf► with their bikes and skatebva:ds We feel wog no lira accts way it the � y cause of a tremendous amouct of pmbtems inval%h v-iloth communities, Note that a majodw of the foot traffic J comes from Hamilton lea, .through Hmitgate, a: short cut to schools: W(I are requesting a closure of this fire aCea s 'r t r manner that YAN;ld discourage say and alt foot traffic. Humiitcn Ranch have another access %-ay located off of Beryl Street, however, this road has bea;ru etostd off b1! a crash date. Since Hamilton Ranch is da not PtiIVATi~ a wish other communities into their community, this would RI a mac better fire ;nd they tK aiko they v`rs'V than the one currently connecting the two communities. liopefcrily this would solve a majority of the problem$ mentioned in this memo. Yarr assistarsce in this matter is featly appreciated. t e E I s r. X�vH0- CrUt'Tts1iS0NGA -._. ._.. - -. 13TAFF REPORT DATE: April 13, 196 1a�7 TO: p Chaivman and Members of'tha Planning Coee�sxion FROM: �i Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tca Grahn, Assistans :-Planner SUBJECT: YIRONMENTAL ASSESSi ENT. AND CONDiTIOM. USE PERMIT 3$41 IRFi7ii FRIERM chmR - . S es aSf�sTi, a square foot c umffln an existing 11,j strial Park in the., Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue a acacia Street- APR-.209-401 -01 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. REM �ues "ad- pprovaI of a Conditional Ilse, Pirsit for a cure. B.' Surround�inng_Land;Use and Zoning: ° fio Ubanz "A'i �'45F R`allroad; Industrial Park Aistrict (ban !4 !Maven Avenue Qver'aj District South - Office Building, Industrial rk 04trict (Subarea, 6), Haven Avenue Overlay Disrict r. East - Warehouse /Distribution Buildings; Ihdustral Park District (Subarea 6) c !- WKst - Vacant; Industrial Park: Districi< (Subarea 6); Haven Avenue Overlay District, U C. General Alan Designations: Project MTA - Inaustrial Park, Haven Avenue Overlay District North % Industrial Park, Haven Avenue overlay District South Industrial Park, Haven Avenue Over;,ay District East Industrial Park. West - Industrial .Park, Haven Avenue Overlay District D. Site Characteristics: The proposed use is located within an 2xls xn- multi—tenant industrial complex. E. Parking Calculations: Namber Of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ram '— Vr Pr e C uFufi Sanctuary o ITEM M s Staff Report CUP 8U.07 -, tsar h unity Fri eNs Church April 13, 1983 IL _M&ISIS: A. €general: This ty of use is fairly Common for industrial AIMS Ind the or `0r10'orn is parking availability, The, 101ount ..of `';parking Davallable, will be • determined by the ;surroundi,Fg uses and their, hours of operation -. in reference to r% the propo3ed. church's twurs of operation, Rancho. Community Friends Church is propostng, along with-,the, Rancho Cucamonga Sowenth- VV— Adventist$ Church and 'tht ;Grace Fellowship. Foursquara.. Church, to use 3,6K square feet of Buflding "C" units:_ C -7 and C -8). The proposal IiVludes a 1,632 square foot sanctuary, thma'childrens classroo", and,a nursery. The Pours of operation are as follows: Rancho Co rniN-, - -10:30,.ari:Iz:00 Pm SuMa r Friends Church ``` 1:00 pre - Si,00 pm Tuesday pat - 8+;30 pa Wednesday gu'hcho Cucatsonga '�cventh -Day 9:30 an - 12:410' pia Sa urdi�yv Adventists Church Grace FellaMship -?. => 8:30 an - 10x00 am Sunda;i Foursquare Church 6:00. pa - 8:00 pay Sunday r? !' The V-Rtman Business Park was developed with total 344 parking 248 of which were based on a ratio of 1/250 for the offici) uses in Buildings A and, 0, and were based on a ratio .06 of 1/00 for the P�vlti- tenant industrial uses in Buildings c and 0. Therefore, the 3,664 square foot urea proportd be ,to leased by the churchs would have 9 parking spaces ,•available , (3,664 + 400) during daytime hours on weekdiays, to reviewing -; the application it was determined that based upon 1„632 square fft.t of" sanctuary area, 47 parking spaces would be rQquired. The parking requirnts far exceed the spaces designated for these suites; however, "his is not anticipatatd to be a problem i; as the hours of operation far:: =the church do not cenforz to= normal business hours. The church will be used. on twro`,, wo3 knights and on weekends. There will he no weekdkv activity c except for limited offlce activity uses. >t , Staff Report CUP 88 -07 r Rancho CommUnity Friends Church April 13, 1988 Paga 3 .ate In assessing the availability ur parkiqc -�hontld be no" ed that no ,other tenants exist. within the a ., , ,s. Therefors,' a condition has be" i'hcluded in the Resolution of Approval requiring the CorWtional Ust Permit to be braarght bof3r*,7t. f * Planning Commission in two (2)° ears to dattaMIA c atibilit;± with adjacent rases and to assess any potew;lal parking ccnflicts.' B. Environmental Assesmant .- _Pgrt I of the Initial study has been . camp e y app a `Siaff'has completed part 11 of ti.* Enviromental Cheeklist aiW found no sf9nif$ca�Rt,'imepalcts or the envirorsant as a result of this,praj�eet, III. FACYS FOR FINDINGS: v 1. That the proposed use is in occoruance with the VAneral Plain, the objectives of the Devel nt Cade, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific 'Plan ��aroa� fo which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the fwb4ie )j health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the prcpertles or leproveoents in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with. , each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific: Plan, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public (nearing .ti e a e ort newspaper, the property posted and no,�Jces sent t AV, property owners within 3DQ Leo t of fine project. V. RECORMENDATIION: Staff recommends, that the Planning Commission Conditional 88-07. at a lr a ch Negative on nd adoption o ht attached Resolution. Resp W fly s tec`, Br -Be Ci cy ne iz 88 :iG:js Attachments: Letter from Appiicane, _ Exhibit 'IV - Location Map E;ihibit "B" - Site pi a.1 `r Exhibit "C" - Floor "Plan 1 Re erlut on of Appr6yal with Conditions _.� 0 41'r Q 40a' X00' 760d N�tae i��re4i fmois afid tot confi/ ratmfls bra a ay /awoxknat" only. 1m* nrstr t aurt� Qty nay is *s weeat'" side qi toc c. The do�tion of a sits ia. an kxtication +� s o�c+ct+s a resgf tityt ma be a6 P-rd ovar as tiea.,f.Iity d*vaiops ! I ra, f �f, a '+" a � a ♦ ` WS a � •Tl#'�i ��'�f �`'^ d Z N $ ♦ .w,a 1 •� ... y • � `` � .� :�� • ice' a ' 1 �; a`R• Q 40a' X00' 760d N�tae i��re4i fmois afid tot confi/ ratmfls bra a ay /awoxknat" only. 1m* nrstr t aurt� Qty nay is *s weeat'" side qi toc c. The do�tion of a sits ia. an kxtication +� s o�c+ct+s a resgf tityt ma be a6 P-rd ovar as tiea.,f.Iity d*vaiops ! :.t ? f y (Item A) PROJECT VOCNIFTION for conditiocal Use 11ara9t _ RANCHO COMMUNITY- FRIENDS m�UZCEf :, Raneito Comeaafty Friends �huxthrmpoarss to offer worship a,sd study sekvicou in` an eeUtina building ori.ginihv deagined for officee, re#eorch & 4eve4rp�jlsftle►tf and light � industrial use. The building is now itat3 has net beeac ! previously occupied. Proposed useis fora total o 3664 l squwte feet with '1632 (square feet for" ctee w4csbip area fast 1263.5 square feet for clavaropaill..apd nursery. Woilbip services will -b� �x,'d &, (k by atds,inad win stars. Study and ahildr�nps rovt�ts' being coauuttedjby one or two adult leaders for.,. ell4arta .of, 6 to iS chil.drea. Scheduled operating Yiu s: r •; 6'ai to 1.2 noon an Seturdays;,,8:30 AM to 12. noon -tnd' 0 :706 PFi to a.-OO FM on ' 1 St aBysA :00 flf: tct 13.00 PH 0,t' T14esd.sya.1 arid, 700 to 5:36 PH %t on Wednoedays. There maay b' ad ti.onnal business andlaz pray&r meetinge of fewer than :n person& ,held at othg�r } times. These- additional mee•t3a s are caZZed as required and are not scheduled. Auk ` The facility will le operated by Rancho romlaunity Frionds Church and will shore the `faci.lit;tes Faith the Rancho. 4 ` Cucamonga. Seventh -Day Advpntiste Chur r and the Grace i Fellowship Foursquare Church., All of )the churche',s meet at different dotes .but 't<otal assemblies by all of ttCm -are scheduled for a total of less ghan twelve Yours per wets -£C 's >. shorn above. r. We are r"- qugstirg a ConA,ltional Use Permit at this,, location because this ' building and loeastion provide a comfortable, ¢11easant eaviroaiment fall our meetiaRs and mare traditional chbvch property is not ;available for rent in tole area. We feel that our services V13:1 -Aot tO!tf1i.ct wtth commercial activity on "tbe site because are cervices are -` conducted at a;:her than normal business hour$. ii fi - ��' Q; ARV IW4. asap s �y +L g /i' Siam FrA FAT 2 �CQN�L S (rNCCa ti�4a-Faerdl a 2 -SYR OUT F'OYE'R 6—IZYR OLDS W!f241 1V X 27' s �� A la YlOr�C: fii' NURSERY— 31`x!Iy2' + ?J'x 6,`m x � r G.4t7 sS. AREA' = 3164 0 4, 2 -4- +� " F,,I e RANCHO COM M UN I rY )eRli5NDS C 14U C H FEB. 0i - t RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF' -THE RANCHO,.,CU .AMG%GA PLANNING COMMISSION, f APPROVING•CONDI'IONAL USE ARMIT 00. 88 -07 FOR RANCHO COMMUNITY FRIENDS CKdRCH,,. "WHO CUCAMONGA SEVENTH -DAY ADVENTISTS CHURCH, AND 'GaRACF FELLOWSW. !FOURSQUARE 4 CHURCH LOCATED AT 10572 ACACIA STREET, SUITES C -7 AND G -B IN TtrE INGUSTRIAL PAP-". DISTRICT, SUBAREA 6 AAA: f' ;i!- 401 -01. A. Recitals. `} M Rancho Community Friends Church, Rancho Cucaewnga Seventh -Day Adventists Church,,knd Grace F*114wship Foursquare Church have filed an application for the issurncL of th& Conditional Use' Permit No.. 88 -07 as- described in they title of this ResoiuL3K „y�; Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subJect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to , as "the application”. On the 13th of April, 1986, the Planning Camission _pf the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed.public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All leagal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. `\ B. Resolution r—, NOW, 'THEREFORE, it i3 hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of'the City of, Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitais,,'Part A, of this Resolutioh-'are true and correct. 2f Based upor, "substantial evidence p �e,Aed to this Commission during t above-refereneed public hearing on April 13, 1888, including i written Fd oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this COWS , hereby specifically finds ,as follows:, - (� ta) The application applies to property located at 10572 Acacia Street,�a:fs - -.0 -7 and C -8, Uliaan Executive Park, which is a Kul i- tenant industrial comply with 344 parking spaces; and fbjj The applicants proposed to operate a church on Satur&4 and Sunday and on P. sday and Wednesday evenings; and 40 Presently' there are no ether tenants within the Complex; however, anticipated hours of operation are Monday through Friday 8 :00 am. to 5:00 p.m. with no weekend activity. PLANNtit CUP ;_as- SION RESOLUTION NO. April -1.s, ivtw Page 2 —_ 3. Base #upon the substantial a fdence presented to this C� fission during the above referenced ,public hearing hand upon "the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 noov , tKk commission hereby finds and conclude$`as f€lltmse � (a) That the proposed'us� �s, An. accord v th the Genera Plan, the o Jec fes of the Dev opment Code, the purposes the District i which the ,is located. " tl� (b`f mat floe proposed ° us�li, togethi er with the conditions, applicable herato, will not be i, welfare, or materially nju fou to s rop , or p ernes or impro;#waents in the v,�cinity. ic? That the proposed use compliet with each of the applicable provisions of; the Developmenttode._ 4. This Couais'^" hereby fiends nd certifies that the project hks been reviewed and co i' in compliance, with the California Environmental Quality ,Act of 1p74 nd gurther, this Qpeesission hereby issues a:egative„ Declaration. - 5. Based upon the; �' i di:�gs and ipnnclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 :above, this Commission hereby 9pproves the application subject to. eeyh and every cor". tion- -set forth bell*- _ (1) Any modification, expansion,' or other change in operation, including day 4�re, will require a revision to the Conditional Uire Permit (fir` Approval of th s, request shall not waive compliance with all sects ns of the Industrial Specific lean, all other applicable City, Ordinances 'and any comDuni or specific plans,tiik effect at the time of occupancj <<} (3) All sip, - proposed for this Conditional Use Permit shallot be desig d in confot� are with the City's Sign �rdinanci "Y 'shall require review and approval ,. by the Planning Division.prioi, to igstallaiion. (4) If the operation of this C Oditional i1se Permit causes adverse effects td rk ", iboring tisinessec, the Conditional Use Permit sllal t be , brought before the Planning Commission for their review and possible termination of the'uSie v PLANNIVS COMMISSION RESQL*10,N'NO. CUP St 07 RANCHO COMMUNITY FRIENDS CHURrH -- - Page 3 (5) Plans shall be abaaitfied to and approved by the Foothill fire Department and Building aio. Safety DIVisipn for their review, and approval prior tc the issuance of building permits, Said plans shall includea> !� � (a) A seating diagram fo` r the sanctuary with the type of seating illustrated. (b) Thy prWsed use for each rooms including ages t !1 of children using each rom. (6) The building shall not hits occupied until ,completion of >all improvements required by Building and .Firer Codes to Pik satisfaction of the Building Sind Safety Division and Foothill fire Protection District. (7) Preschools or schools are not allowd by thfs permit; however, this shall not precludw Anurseries or,, Sunday School during the hours of religious or group assembly. (8) This Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commissiort in two (2) years to !, determine;;, cWatibility kith adjacent uses and assess any potential ,parking conflicts. (9) Operating hours shall be limited to .vieekends and after S:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. (10) There shall be no weekday activity except for church off;ye uses provided the activity does not exceed the suites designated nine parking spaces. Fes;, 6. Thee O"uty 104cretart to this Cowiss on shall certify to the adoption of thrs ;Aesolution. APOROVED AND ADW -7ili THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY., iF ry T. Mc- e a vnan ATTEST: , -Secretary �- 1, `i TIN PLANNING COWISSIO1 R£SOi:IFt°ION NO. CUP 88 -07 R H6 Cakmi Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Steretary of the Plarninrg Co*lssi�,r of � City of -Rancho CucAWnga, do hereby certify that t r,for�egoiny Resod" � Qn W9 s duly. and f rp9u1arly introduced, passed, and adopted the Planning "isskon.o l<�. MY Of Ran`ha CuCawrtga w, at a regular meetthe of the Plannit✓ co ssion Wld on the 13th day of April tom„ by tt* tolIowing +rt ta�ta -pit: AYES. Ci�SSSI4N£RS: ;; ,, NOES: COWISSiONERS: ABS�MT: COti ISSIMRS: a J i o o , 0 ;I e - - Dl o ►STAFF REPORT DATE: April 13, 19,68 » TO: Chafri an aid Mt rs of the Planntog Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Civ plenner BY: Cindy Norris, assistant Planner - r> SUBJECT COWDITIOKV 1 E PERMIT 87 -36 » FOOTHILL FIRE. DI , ., CT - ,A request to allow allowl, InstalfaLtI011 o - a +or&v lar structum to (",t4rvu as at rault,i- purpose facility be located in tlr odium iv' itasioentiel District E11-14 dwelling units per acre) at 6627 Aott.Vst Avenue wO2m1D1�lI , Staff requests that this application bi continued to the June 8, 1988 Planning Corr ss on meetin" order, to schedule this Application for review by the Technical and Designee committees for items, ir.%ludinR availability Of parking, Ae _..,tics` and site improvements, per Development Code Section 17.10.030.4. The applicant has been informed of this matter and agrees to the continuance. i'Re spec fill Xubmitt d, Brad Bugler ' Z. C11v PX'anner BB:Ckjs G s T H� J �1 c e . &d y DATE: April 13, 1988 ~� z TO: 6i1;4man and Members of the Alareping Comission FROM: Brad Ruller, City Planner. BY: Tom Grahn;. Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONSiTMU11. USE PERFIIT 80 16 OIL - The reques t o e , s a ram ng cen er in a"i-easid space of 6y790 squaft feet Kttin an existing industrial park in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) located at the northeast corner of tltica Avenue and Sixth street - APR 2094V -17. L PROJECT Ala) SITE DESCRIPTION. A. Action Re ested: Approval Of &rConditional Use Permit for a regional tr0ning center and the i$sua =_ce of a Negative Decl &r7ttion. B. Surrounding Lard Use and Zoning; WR - acan ; GonerAT nc us r•isl (Subarea 1'� } South - General Dynamics; te^lerai Industrial (Subarea 11) East, - Vacant; raeneral Industrial (Subarea 11) West - Coca -Cola Facility; Industrial Park (Subarea 5) C. General Alan,zi.gg nations: ro, ecl"ST£e - enera Rustrial North - General Industrial S &1uth Gencral Industrial East - General Industrial West - In6ustrial Park {�{ � I D. Site Characteristics: The proposed use is located ;hthin an exist ng nxe Tt 775—naffi-f industrial/ complex. Building 4 includes fourteen tend `- su.tes, fr' �9, /' which are currently occup'v4d by such usesfas,a leasing [-` a temporary employment firmo a deli, and an interior de' erg Approximately fifty percent of the tenant suites it Buildings I and 2 are occupied and'uv.s include a church and various industrial and quasi4ndustrlil uses; bath tenant suites in Building 3 are occupied by quasi- industrial uses (See Exhibit "ell), E, Parking Calculations- Number of � Wmber of � Type Sgaare Parking Spaces Spaces Of Use F��on��tagge�� Ratio Required �, provided ra n ng center 6,7 1 s went capacky �l Iii facility __ _ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 88 -16 » MOBIL OIL April 13, 1988 �.e ag , F. A licable uul�„ a s: The industrial Specific plan c6 oina :', perm a training facilities as a "Personal Service* use 4tthin Subarea 11, It. ANALYSIS A. (*neral: The Mobil Oil Corporation, is proposing to use appro`xi�arately 5,790 sgaarer;feet of tenant space within Building 1 a 4, which has a total floor area of 30,440 square feet 4see Exhibit V). The proposed use entails the establisheent of a western regional 'training center for the purpose of teaching nw, owners and tanagers day- to-day operations of a service sWlon. Tht"tenall space is divided up into four classrooms, three offices, a rafeption area, and a break -roam. Operation of the facility consists of conducting two indivi:ival classes .. each week. The hoUas of operation are ;ondaiy through Friday from 8 :00 A.M. to 4:06 P.M. The 80,000 square foot multi - tenant 1ndustrf-,1,, coaaplex was , developed with a total of 230 parking spaces; onl�i 200 parking spaces were required at the .parking ratio of 1/400. A;tYpical tenant leasing 6,790 square feet and parked at a ra:tio:�'_lf 1/404 '! would require seventeen parking spaces, The region:�r� raining '`; centers requirements are one parking space for 4c# three � student capacity of each classroom plus one parking sate for 1 each faculty member or .e!!ploye�. Based upc th; parking ratio, a total! of eighteen parking spates are> required. Although this exceeds the parking designatmd for this tenant space, the complex is-,over parked by thirty spaces, Therefore, sufficient parking will be available to support the proposed user , A. Environmental Assessment: Part'l of the Initial Study has been C OW 2 ° y e can app « Staff has completed Part II of the Enviromental Checklist and has fcu�i no significant iapapts on the environment as a result of ails *oJect. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the general Plan, the objectives of the Development Cade, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be ietriwntal to the public hearth, safety, or welfare, or materially injurioi s to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of rho applicable slm provisions of the industrial 5pecific..Paan. i1 PLANNING A�,'OMMISSXWSIA", REPORT o RE: CUP 88-16 - NOBIL `OIL April 13, 1488 I \\ IV. GC t MERCE-t Thies ew ' as been advertised aj a public hearing newspaper, ,thd property posted and notices ,ent :. to alT proper w owners within 3W feet of the ptoject site. V. RECOFNEIR,rATION: Staff recoiatnds that the lanning ;omeission approve anoMonal 'list Perm-it 88-16 , throe " issaanco of a Negative Uclaration and adoption of the aitachod Roolution. o ?Isp .,Y sAtitted, i or Su r C1 n - BD :TO:jr Atiac ants: from -L �atiaon Map Exhibit - Site Plan/Tenancy of Bui{! dingf 1, 2, 1 4 4 Exhibit *CO - floor Flan Resolution of Approval f - i I�r Maroh Z'S, 19as CxTr Or raj fcioo CUCA*DM* 9320 KC" A'ks•aline Reed Rancho CudAmongat, C&)9I, -730 ` RE: I OS L ct .: t ° is c .f ? ffi+GZ G 8 85 Vast This letter vill o+trire 'as notice to thw- type of uss's .eagarcding, the proposed training oenter, at the RancUo Paq'iric Business PArk.' Kobil tail corporation chat year* agar tatFablishad a Western regional training ,Centor for the purpose at ta%ohing ne,4 service station o'"noraS aid xa nagsrxxs day to day Operations.. The vntArio /Rancho Cucsmoatja- market was sale+eted p%-ir►arIly drs to its sace»y socasa:'.to ae *ajar airport and itss prfi xinl,ty to rasa Mqol**. 'I%is derision prompted the saxisti b; Ontario facility ssix Years ago within the Dal, Rio Xnduvt -1. a , Park. as tiara continued, the choice; i'or relocation at Raua 'O Pacific ftolness park was one' of a more prozesssional envir6nmatnt' an4 amenities the park had to after. The operation 0t� Zhja facility Consists "L conducting two individual classes each vao: aanh cl :Is consisting of a to iG individual*. The dtsigxs �s� a fcaur classroom tenant %prove sent is thaat to conduct di a -tou unotibn in each zccm: Recounting and geginni*j Personal,', Campttex, 3a109 and Product information; EgttipX$At and Rep&irs and Personal and legal Isesuag. The majority of these 20 VO*klf Students lily into Ontario and arse,. xot , by neighboring hojels and shuttled to a<nd from t„ho site ja ch day. This operation is maintained by th* roast fsll,l -dear $mplc�rees: a nanagor, two lultructorsa and a receptionist.' } 1._ 1. Maroh Z'S, 19as CxTr Or raj fcioo CUCA*DM* 9320 KC" A'ks•aline Reed Rancho CudAmongat, C&)9I, -730 ` RE: I OS L ct .: t ° is c .f ? ffi+GZ G 8 85 Vast This letter vill o+trire 'as notice to thw- type of uss's .eagarcding, the proposed training oenter, at the RancUo Paq'iric Business PArk.' Kobil tail corporation chat year* agar tatFablishad a Western regional training ,Centor for the purpose at ta%ohing ne,4 service station o'"noraS aid xa nagsrxxs day to day Operations.. The vntArio /Rancho Cucsmoatja- market was sale+eted p%-ir►arIly drs to its sace»y socasa:'.to ae *ajar airport and itss prfi xinl,ty to rasa Mqol**. 'I%is derision prompted the saxisti b; Ontario facility ssix Years ago within the Dal, Rio Xnduvt -1. a , Park. as tiara continued, the choice; i'or relocation at Raua 'O Pacific ftolness park was one' of a more prozesssional envir6nmatnt' an4 amenities the park had to after. The operation 0t� Zhja facility Consists "L conducting two individual classes each vao: aanh cl :Is consisting of a to iG individual*. The dtsigxs �s� a fcaur classroom tenant %prove sent is thaat to conduct di a -tou unotibn in each zccm: Recounting and geginni*j Personal,', Campttex, 3a109 and Product information; EgttipX$At and Rep&irs and Personal and legal Isesuag. The majority of these 20 VO*klf Students lily into Ontario and arse,. xot , by neighboring hojels and shuttled to a<nd from t„ho site ja ch day. This operation is maintained by th* roast fsll,l -dear $mplc�rees: a nanagor, two lultructorsa and a receptionist.' } 1._ �Y PWRMNW a h i ! lilt, 3i 3i td q a $ VIA tug 4 r � 111 m PI !{ SI _ 3 t i 4:t;ca Avenue , —��_ ._ . - • -- �-�--- - ._, to � � � � } 106 ,229' Mercury a,T �'� IZ.li o$Gtit ;e, i J x'130 ls.�a .aj, --+' t rW= f 138 &n2N. Itf I40 1632 ��' �;t f��) 140 '736 ,% Birc�hwso��d 1 '1632 { j0 a dr ct� R 1 1560 Club �;�j -- -—°—� -� o 1195 19'2 • - �`� lts" _ t v ;`t T ,� Z 160 10 :, 2 • 7 170 ! -'2' Er 7 is tu:v y er t 4 1; G 4A. D t03 Y,•.Al ri_ Et+.n t'.♦ U+ C-e .. �`_. 13301 r, f _. a r c "� ' �" <.zx� .. "'T r•�. :,.i � �r� ----_ �;�� . . , • . ��h� • � jib J ' .. .. w F 7_ t r: t t � •toss_ s.. r. • �� $ r , IF ,- . •� . �� N w. iii • - w ti 2 6� h �. •' r wow : , •4f . V It o Q�• aYs` foe rus O ! xE C i ip fd 0 M rr b rr 10 a � R. w a y= 4 Fi `fi a � r• d r• o 01 r - d 0 0tdQ0W N rr nnnn � W Bz ED 0 B1 "i J d rr t6 rr R7 Y.S. RaR{/tlRt II #[t R •f Htl /'M a,tF1: iR.S iKORw lit MSt.� %. } r AACIYIC SCCNC, INC. BUILDvtING i`,zftg`��+ i k i Htt/,Yp 'i01C ItgU5lPilt I'm 1 4 :.: f .\ a..aCM C.'4.K+0.. C.. i.4...t♦ �. �'.J �. j ,RESOLUTION R6;. A RC;OLU'TiOR OF THE RANCHO CUCAN10.g ik PLANNING coMIsSION j APPROVING COMITIONAL USE PMMIT NO. -88- ' 6 FOR A j REGIONAL TRAINI!((, CENTER FOR M601i:.:DIL nXnrigATl'.,'rt LOC ^TD, A 926V- r FYCA AVME, SUITE 100 Its -ME GEMER'2 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 11 APR 209- 41 -17 A. Reatals. •_ Ii J (I) Pac fi`6 Scene. Inc. has Medan application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Pemit No. W-16 as described in the tide of this Resolution. Hereinafter 1� this Resolution, the subject donditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (11) Oif)the 13th of April, 1988, the lacsning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a fitly noticed'pu llc hearing an the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All 1egal prerequisites to tfio' adoption; of this Resolution have occurred. 0. �6solutfon. r ,;4 THEREFORE,, it is hereby found,. determined and l relolved by the Planning Commission of the city- of.Rancho Cucamonga as follow; I. This Commission hereby specifically finds teat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution art-,itrue.ane correct. 2. .Based upon substantial evidence press ted. t6 tms tomniszion during the above -rel1arenced - public hearing an Apra'. 1�„ 1988, 'including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follorfs. j (a) The application applias to prop%rrty located. at 9269 Utica Avenue, Suits 100, within a fui,ly,_ developed site consisting of four. .multi tenant industrial buildings and 230'parking spaces; and (b) The applicant proposes to operate a regional training center Monday through Friday from 8 :00 AA to 5;00 P.M. with no weeknight or weekend activity; and (e) The complex pro9ided 230 parking spaces when only 200 were required; therefore, adeg0te parking will be available for the use 3. Basel upon the substantial evidence presente4,to this Commission th during the, above-referenced public hearing and upon e specific findings -of facts set forth in paragraph l and 2 above, this C,- mmission hereby finds ao u concludes as follows; I PLAWING tOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, RE: CUP 38.16 — MOBIL OIL J ° April 13, 1988 Page C (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the Benerpl Plan, the objectives of the Development \� "d_we; tl:a �ri Yrs # the district in which the site is located, - (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental tl the public health, safety, or 0 ° W41fare, or materially in j.urious to proprties or improvements in the vfQ4ty. (c) That the prrstgposed # cowlles'w' h� each ofd the �� If applicable provisions of the tiaY opment Code. N 4, This Co"'Ission hiieby finds and certf Pies that the project has been revifte1 and tonsi.ered In compliance with th C Acµ of 1ga0 i , further„ thf Ox"t si eby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the fiasd n3s and conclusijins set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3' "above, this COWS510« hereby application ,approves lithe sub ec. to each and every condition set forth belw: '11) Any modification,- explosion, or !" � change in operation �ftj�ision will require a to the Conditional Use Permit." 8 (2) Approval of this request shall not- wjive 4 compliance with'all sections of:lhe industrial r Area Specific Plans and_.- --s'r1 � ot.her ;City Ordinances.. (3) If,the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses oe operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the 3e. _. AQ Occupancy of the facility shall not 60MVnce I until such time, -as all Unifoeam; Buu ding GodW and Stele Fire Marshall's regulations have been compTied -;;-jth. Prior to occupancy, plans shell be tubmitt�,4 to the Foothill `ire profecti f District and the Building and Safety Divisifrt to show compliance. ' The building shall be Inspected for t* lance prior to o4tupancy. I, =i r PLANNING COMMISSION RESQl UTION N4. RE: CUP -16 MOBIL bIL Aprilo 13, 1986 J C5i Any signs, propposed for the facility shall, be designed in Mor+aanr,) with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, any Uniform Sign Program for the colex, and shall' require review and approvaS' by the PlaroNng Division,, prior t® installation. W This Conditional:, Use Permit, is approved for a i ara�ci as of four employees ` {one 'manager, two instructors, and one rsceptioni'sty and twenty, students per, week. _ 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Cission shalt i�6rtif� to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROSh1AND ADOPT% THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988. PLRf WINO COMISS10i OF THE CITY OF RW_H€3 CUC MOtjr1A G BY; j- �r a '1:` e a man 4 ATTEST Urad Buller_,%pu1rSec-re7Ury i I: Brad 8uTler putt' Secretary o! the lannin Coaaaission of tine City of ` Rancho Cucaraon\� ga�'an� ereby ca ^Cify t9��t' the foregoing itesolut#on was duly and regularly introduced, Passed, and a 0r)pted rky the :Planning Commission of, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting if a planning Commission holds on the 13th dal >of April, 188, by O.e fallowing voterto� wit: AYE COMMISSIONERS` t � HOES: COMMISSIONERS: f ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: I C" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOItiGA, STEP REPORT 4 DATE: April 13, 1988 0o� I- Z TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission a 1977 FROM: Brad Bu11Qr, City Piannei•;; v BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: WIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AM DEV'ELOP14ENT CODE AMENDMENT 13 a i _ Wr amenNint E5 chapter I7 -'-'.p a ere opmgn Code modifying certain tit_ *I, �jent regulations for Lowy diuu lesident +al . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND V'ICTORM COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88-03 - CITY, %Wdft - An amenment to 0e V FOR* n art ex ifying certain development r( ulations for tow - Medium and Medim Residential: ENVMONRENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISA COMMUNITY PLAN amen n o The lerra. vista community an text madifying certain development regulations for Low- Medium and Medium Residential. 1. BACKGROUND: During recent years, the City has seen an increase in eve opment of single family ,detached subdivisions in the Low Medium' Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre; District, particularly in the 6 -8 dwelling units per acre density range. In reviewing these proposals, the Planning Commission has consistently raised concern regarding neighborhood appearance, usable yard area, and design quality. The City Council has directed the Planning Commission to re-examine the tow- Medium rational standards, with emphasis on strengthening the devel'opfert standards to address these critical issues, On September 17, 1986, the Director of Community Development presented to the City Council a slide presentation, on the issue of minimum lot sizes and minimum dwelling unit sizes. Fallowing that presentation, the Council accepted ' BIA's offer to fund a stuffy of housing and marketing c.7nditions in reidtion to the lot size /unit size options presented by staff to the Council. The, study was commissioned` as a factual survey to provide data foie -;t{ne Council to use in the decision Raking process. The,' primary objective of the stud was to analyze what impact the proposed or any increase in lot -Size/unit size would have on th6 housing market in Rancho CucamoroA. The completed study was presented to the Co, Ission and 'council, in November of ,1987. The Lowtr4 lion received the study as a factual document and concluded no :further staff an'ilysis was necessary. f` c - r ITEMS P. 4, R PLANNING Ct1 ISSION STAFF REPORT OCA 88 -03, VCPA 88 -03, TVCPA 88-0.3 J April 13;'1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: n A. Oevelo R R "' -it „Code. 6n pebruary IO, 1988; the Planning � oars ss o0-72-v-f"eW , nd considered options for development standards to add4ss the critical concerns of small lot dellelopmant. The Planning Commission directed staff to proceed with the necessary awndetnts based on Option 2 for both, center X plat and innovative product: CENTER PLOT (LOW- MEDIUR OPTIONAL STt ARDs) "--0 22 5,000 sq. ft. Minim= Lot Area► 5,500 sq. ft. Average Lot Area 5/10 ft. Side'*ard Minimm Setback 25 ft. Front Yard Average Setback 20 ft. Front Yard,KnImum Setback t' J 15 ft. Rear Yard 50 ft. Lot Minimum Width INNOVATIVE PRODUCT (LOW- MEDIUM OPTIONAL STANDARDS) OPTION 22 3,500 sq t. Wftli w Lot Area 4 000,.,sq.'4. Average Lot Area ` 0 /10 ft., Side Yard 20 ft. Front Yard ; 25 ft. Rear Yard 45 ft. Lot Minimum Width 8u Planned Conuunitieso Within the Terra Vista and Victoria anne osMun, ies, a number -of amenities are ,provided `as a tirade -off for smaller lots. The planned cowunities feature extensive trails systems and other = design, unities which, in itself, is a fora of inn6vation o; s the City _encourages. Therefore, .'staff would reend that innovation continue to be encouraged within the pl(,jned camtnunities by not increasing setbacks and lot width, 6�:ept for traditional tenter plot homes. The following standards are recommended: n i _PLAUNING`tOWISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 89 »03, VCPA 88 -03, TVCPA 88 -03 April 13, 1988 h J Page 3` «_ I CENTER PLOT PRMUCT 4ti�F-tiEE�}TtAWAdEDIIN RESIDENTIAL) il -5,000 sq. ft. Wh Lot k a 5 :3 sq. Average tat Area 5/19' ft. Side Yard ItIalow Setback 25 ft. Front Yard Afarage Setback 20 ft. Front Yard Wf,,ir r Setbactc 15 h. Rear Yard §0 ft. Lot Minima ktdtft INIOVA14IVE PAMUCT tZl3i -2 IWHEO RES,jDENTiAL 3,5W'". ft. ;Xfni fLot Area R_ $q. ft. Averi� 1e Lotirea 700 sq. ft. Private Open, Space Minima The addition of a standard for private open space is necessary to ensure that adegr!ate outdoor space is "y vided beca +use of varying sine or reap yard setivck conditions. ' Bar Planne01 COMnItY text% currently contain separaie standards, for "cor!ventianxl" add "cluster" development. ConventiOftl housing it Terra Vista fn4Udet si;rgle family detached ci4ter plat; j lot tine and single family attache units. Zero lot link` "2" lot line,; and duV5ex /triplex styi4, hates are i�rnavatIVO design techniques that should be distinguished from traditional center plot housing types. Staff r, amends that conventional be renamed "center- plot". tnd all* the other innowativd'forms of housing under cluster/ inrtovatiVe standards. Cluster housing generally, means a pro3edi--vhere the hn6es are clustered together on a single, building) ite aria usually, around a common open space system. This i§ eh innovative site planning concept which is one fora of a "Manned ijnit bevelopment" or POD. Staff recommends that the cluster development Standards be expanded to include trthe types of innovative :sousing previously mentioned. 1 �4:! 1 PLANNING COMMISSION S F REPORT DCA 88-03, WP&M-03'/�/Wtf ,4' TVCPA 98-03 Aoril 13, 1988 Page 4 The /*dfum Residential land Us�' d4sigftaUoWJn boil Victoria and�"Terra Vistit Ccmnity p7ans,,4S a dqnsitv range �of 4 to j4 dyiAlltng Uniti PC- acre. This, followed the Madiox density rAW Of the tity' original Geniral plan. Ht**ver, the City ,.�as amended its L. jraj Plan to,,-Oliplipatt ' a overlap of 'rdenWy that fOMV4 existed between L4W- fun (44 Mg dwelil Units per acy�t , ) and Medium (4-14 dwel I i units, per OcrOR) bY chAlnging the 4ensity range of tuha% ulp Resi M7 land us 8 to 14 4"lling Unit$ pet, acre Staff would rec*=Mt tbt sw change be made for vicioha and Term, VistA for, the s*e r9i.asons. 111. REMMENDATION: Staff recomads that the planning Commission Mauct the public hearings. . If the ordiftft*$ are accept i able as drafted. �,therk, , of the attacW ,,adoption approval to the Vty Ce-mor.,0111 wouldbe Appropriate. If there arq any necessary oodificatf t4 the . OMMMOS,- staff should be df ' and bring the revisions back to tije�� Planning Comission. "o-I Resp 11 1,s tted Brad Buller, City Planner BD.-DC:te AttdChMentS: Resolutjons'�, Ordinances A RESOLUTION OF THE - PLANNING COMMISSION OF THF�ITY OF RANCHO NGA RECOMlEIdIING APPROVAL OF DEVE,QPidENT CODE j E NT NO. 88 -03, AMENDING SECTION 17.00.040 PERTAI ING ? DEVELOPfitW STANDARDS FOR THE LOW- MEDIUM' RESIDENTIAL OCT WHEREAS, on the 13th dq of April, 1988, the Planning Commissiorirheid a duly advertised public hea,!in pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code, �r SECTION 1:, The Pinch � Cucamonga Planning CoWssion has found that this project will n�t create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recosiMends issuance of a negative Declaration on April 13& 1988. tales, THEREFORE, `8E IT P,ESOLYM: ,. 1. That pvrs'uant to Section 66850 to 66856 of the Califorij�a Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga_her6y recomme66's that the City Council approve and adc-,kt the attrched Ordinance amending Title 17 of tree Roncho,Cucamonga Municipal Code. E. That a of this "olutiorw and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the Cftl Cauncil. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL, --_,— T, ",PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LWHO C 'JGA Larry T. Fc_M—eV-,CF-%1f%Fn—,— °_`"° ` ATTEST: �Pira u er, pu y : ccrx ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Sicretary of -the Flanninv, Commission of the City. of Rancho Cucc- nga, do hereby c6rtify that the foregoing Resolution was duly = end regularly introduced, passed, and adopted byjthe Planning Commission of the City of Rancha= 't=amonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hold on the 13th day of April, 1988, by the followtpg vote -to -wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: - NOES: COMMISS<ONERS: :ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �Zw5 I Lys I i „ AN oRDINli iCE of Tf CxT , WwIL OF THE CITY RANCHO Ci}CA�1t, CALIFoamI , g"w,'ofVt;LttFi NT i E AMENDMENT NO. 86 -�03, ANENDINty SECTION 17 .08. d PERTAINING To DE aopmrr., T STARS 1•C`Z THE LOW- 410ILM > � RESIDENTIAL DIin, x T f - MEREAS, on the 13th day of April, f 88, the kirRning CORNIssion hold a duly advertised public h-ear ng purrP. +ant to Section 65W4 of,the palifornia 6ovemant Code.,and re(:om wded to the City Council .adoption ,)�f De'relopwt� Code Amendment No..WG3; and ' WHERCAS, on tNe 44 of ; 1984 tht!'�Uty Council held` a duly advertised public HUM ag pursuan to Wtion 65864 01� the California Government Coda to consider Development Code Axendment. SECTION 1: Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga�nicipal ?`ode is hereby+ amended by adding Table, 17.08.040-C and Table 17,08. C as attZ� ed hereto and incorporated by reference, 1 SECTIt1N 2: T i` 17 of the Rrachi Cucamonga Nu nicioal Codes is hereby, tl aiv.lded by adding Table 17.Oa-PAO-C1 and -Table 17.08.040 -C2'as attad ed hereto ai-1 incorporated by reference. SECTION 3! This Carrtcil hereby finds and certifies that the oject h- been reviewed in compliance with the California. Environmental Y�;e 'i Act df 1970 and hereby concurs with the Negative Declaration posted with re ect �-to she project. c. Thy rlyor sh311 sign this'1rdinsnce and the City Clerk shall cause the same to > be published within fifteen (16) rte, after its passage at least once in`The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general =circulation Published in the City of lintar o ,awifornia, and cfrculited in the City of Rancho Cucamolrga. u CITY Gh7UUCIL�ORDlttA T NO. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMELWENT 88-03 The following tables supplement those standards set forth in the previous tn4Mes, for devm'ppment of a Law- Medium Residential product. TAKE 17.08,P40 ' ' L�. '- i+fA PNM i ro�iw�i �cM�EA�%ItMM��G�iyE��Ni17:R I .�.� ��l�iM DEVE Aid WIS Fl tAt Am: C Minimum ii Average §,500 `f Minim= Mkt 5,008 it t 01mieesim Minimum Width ' , !iik r (at rec,'ared` front _ seek) Setbacks: kF!'ant Yard Averse 5 `� t Front Yard Minimum EO Interior Side Yard SAO Rear `hard i5 , Projects may al:o be filed under the °Low - Medium Innovative Product Optional Development Staf, a provided ,y the foija pa rbiectives fo innovation: I. Provide high design quality throughout tte pro3ecta and G� 2. Provide creative design solutions which address the ceitical Concerns of neighborhood compatibility, density tri4z Lion, and design quality; and, 3. Promote an attractive strentscape and di'Acoueage f%- toi�us streets neatnated by asphalticoncret&;� gas- ages, tncfcarst 4. Creete well - designed space, particularl,/ useble yard space. CITY' CCylNCIC ORQINANCE NO.' EVEi.OPMENT CODE,00+ ANT 88-03 T^ XE I7 1*.04 -CB LOR-MuM IMN;1' ATIm � O Y +TIiJiE11t .Op'l1�E 5T Lot Areas Mia mum list Aygrage 4,000 Minimum Pet, 3.5001 \ wat Lot Dim"sion -, J� Minimum Width f.. tat required, �a 45 s front setback) Setbacks: J `i Front Yard Hinirim 20 I Int�ior'S�� arsY� 0�1�= Rear Yard I5 r - yr -- r ; Section 1,1 0$ 0�14 R. Basic beveigoment Stanndards�` The following Gable, Table 17.0$.040 -B sets fiith AL minimum development standirds fot residential development projects filed up to wrl the mid -point of the Wmitted density range. TABLE 17.08.04" BASIC 6M$ W iK$1F1T STANDAI ` a adB -.i (Rat a Not LtpiijM y. _ yi, 15 15 U - (Owetttng Unfit. Hit Lot Arear dYtnimuei Nc. Awne 22,500. a Reeidenttd S Wding k XUPmvm+4c. ta!s .� ^.0,000 U2 if, c 5,006 ;UX wit ) - (Aat'mltladgr'x.4 en sJ Up to : 67bto 19 43{ at :C N( Mni 0*9u F 't swe n�Yi,gif itmit >-4e �. *�Q dwK,r%- sonig. tea Dlsgedeear -_ i1 Ctt i 1rM0Mt4A tj M ntmum Width *Avg. vary_E0 i� s€ tt/R aaetauwredfrrnt Vin. eorner tot wide - too }" bP ?" r / N/E Minimum depth Nin(m ISO • " NJR } r i front Propettrifnc! 90 (g 30 x If f1t Mn. flag (at frontage ( ('?nt property line) 30 }' . f " .I $lR fr _- Front Yarde•e 42AV i,X 'Sat 3 NtR CarneaSR+e Yard 2' urryxs S � tnterte:StCtYar4 10115 a adB -.i All tnterf6t 1 i 1 15 15 U - (Owetttng Unfit. Aceeswrytiteg.) t Reeidenttd S Wding sepersttemu Front to Front N/R ' ; J '{tgL 25 S SM z zo 30 j Other Min Mt. > 10. height Lite(tatfa w �, 7S 21 35 4 43{ at - ttoe Coverage ` Section 1 I°_ 040 C, Qptional Bevelupmefat Standards: i, -the foio(ving tasls - `Pabie 17.08,040 -C sets forth minimum development standerds for residential deve ?optnent projects filedo dp loAhe maximum density permitted by, the density range. < _ �T TABLE 17.1s.04.0-C OMONAL DEVkLOPMENT V AHIIAI�S wf Cl -1 1 3. (RIA Sot i LM + tl�Ytm 8dll ANN { SAC '. Hin r loot Acda i HP$ (tGlttimJm net) " � U0 to - (per1rit paraeeel � V �ta l� _ - '. Meireuta DI.SUL* tI+(t %ae � 4t family dm{6rticd dwlellin-4 isitaM66Z Fir, ! at Dittsaiiat� ` l a i Minimum wtd LR (t3 required mt S N[8. trtbacW % Minimpin ne th rt !GTR Sotlta63rnD toot`$!cMei �� G:4v8Pij,' private s {+ it or a t ver; :4 ycq Drivewe�+ ISat'$ - sa"', ` s. tvatl��k' vary £3 Come. Side Yard. Ylt'a' _ Joe interitr Side Yato Nlkf tt (ntextp. SG. : s l Yg iF '- 2od /3d Site :�.lirdary (Dwelling Chit/ - - A,19-_-Acry al,-C.) lteafde"tw Bunditig 8aparatiana - Front to Front 81 25 ltl WR t+ othar NIX W Haliht LL�itati e� i&_ 35 404 $54 Open sPace It"itree: - - - _ Private Open Space - 111011 Si ii: 4001150 ' , ( � ' � ISOltoo Wrgiilid F100.1 tf01de8 . Uppar St2ry Units ... - Common open spocte 414 100 (minimum %) �qMs 15% Usable opri $pace° ✓ 16 454 M!i io9¢ (Private and eommon) lasaraat ttt AxulPacility /B Baquired l t is Section 19,OO.tS(b�0' ' > P* Req*td rzomW,� Ia 'Section t§rxtt lCat� i aendrp� g Slab d1 rt fagi�tAnt to .ftetiad EI.CR Ir Pr,2rgy Ccrsarvstian NIX Required '17.Ct Gb?wwAt to steno•," t WU ®' a. lSxciueln(# l;nd ubessatn tc, seCJGCL *' Ty Slrlk t> jnd aPCerlalS• D ASS. Yewe� drool vlumate curb Sept un puDlic or.pttvate streets, n tail .o Table 1: J8.o47 -tI far xd5(tic.7al stttlack anfrxtrbtton.. t t i C �imtt StGEy :rttYhin Ltiti 'cat a{ Y't, or L BlsezleC Q:.? .ntiltip a taintty dwelhn t d cd to feet al nciacent xp vL. L or LM district. Les; ty nla feet `'i 1 . r tom CacL1+1f sidewalk witP.4 eond6mti3i,7m Mwnhgtiet or 6pertment CCgttare, a�to ^,ere gernge aa) `.EanL. ,¢rage setbq rx is IV mvntmum of title f eatr; garage, used,Ptr Dect,on 1..07 i.#U L w r-1 sinO;t• ja:nliy detefit! ^d `S =" iii- detaMed development. t Aar, meter err s's J!g'ai:it ihtetiae strelt treat= f g a s.ng a farht0 .+�tecRpd d�elltd�. iesz 4.iyt ?OD oGUe,rB {eat s�ui require tt:e x�ptavil of s c rdu.c ak't5A axrit act Sea':�aa ES.GidJ30.Q - 4 ., R S a WJ"Mr 41vealn s - g pt�rmitt� jtr section I2 uff.J4rf•r�, Rt(ar ib fib' E;.OLOaOC1 ! r ;able 17 Gi,O4t �, 1� �1 A R5W U` ION OF TE9E :R�'�:d� _` t1C?1�MiNrA PCANHiid�c CQI�FES5d6�# sMF Si -W-03, TO CMFY THE LOW M Mk IUM � RES2�7RI�? Xfu. 8'�ELflPi;� #T STARB�# @S „ - M'HERclMS;'on the 13th day of,= ; r AtANtIWC4 q ` YICTCRIA CUMNN,i t Art 1 3 ; „ 1tM�Ni ��Ea -TJ3 Yom: P x 1�� .. 2 Aj A??RDVCD "!'sW AW'rfA T IS IST" BAY, APRIL. 198$. , 11 r/ fr Ell.: RH;E+Ka vOFl�IiSSIiI�! ` -TfIE ��IiY,� Edit l:b � ,° �`: , BY: eputyr, -.:J' Butter, M,Auta Secretary Oj the planning comp4isfgn�af the ii ;Of fi�.rscha Luc Tanga d+� -,roby certify that the fdre"i" bsolt�� tan rats duly and vegu zrlf intrQced, passed, a;,s aduptodC qty a I+ h, f a [ City ofen�:lr6 Cur t n# =.,,�aaa€ssfi�nf the,' ! ga, ai a' =�tgm r o4t of 'tip iYat�t�p C'OMISsion,,t- —' an ,A 13th day of Apr�i3, 19SE e fpil fit+ 3tgtta «"�:+a�i t" r NOBS, _ tComot rohi , A85E:N ; CCif ISSIWgRS: C r; i AN ORDINUCC OF TAE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MW L I CUCA3NOReA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTIMlS VICTORIA COMIMUiiITY Ah� AMENDMENT 8&03, 10 MOD$FY TNE'LOW MEDIUM AND MEDILIM , RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1 The City Council Of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION I: The City Council hereby finds and determines the-, following: I A. That the PlaPing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hv; -ing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends that 1 Community Man text, amendmeat 'hereinafter described, and this Ci�.Countil has held a public hearing in j she 000, are "manr;� ' prescribed by law and dttly heard and considired said recommendation. B. Thair- this C=Wnity Plan text amendment is , consistent with the 1eneral Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. - 1 C. That ' this Community plaft ,text arnendeent is j consistent with We Develojx, Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. i 0. -this Cowiniti! Plan text amendment will have no sign111.c4n envirromental Impact as provided in the Negatj-�t - ggclaratton filed herein. SECTION ? Tlx: Vitoria rimmunity Man test, Bart III, Section 1, hegulations and Standards for levelopment, diagrams "Typical Garage Setbacks" on Page 244, is hereby amended, in part, i;: mad in tent and graphics as s, attached. MTFiN 3: Th. ViCtoriai- mimunity Plan. text, Part III, Section I, Regulations an.:3 Standards for Dkv jopent, subsection "Residential Develc^. nt Standards Law &diem Density Residential" comencIng on page 212, is hereby amended, in port, to read as attached. SECTION 4: The Victoria Community Plan text, Part III,.. Section I, Regulations and Standards for DeveloMIt, subsection "gesidential cevelopment Standards Medium Density Residential ", on Page 224, is hereby amended, in part, to read as attached. The Mayor shall sign this Ordina;ice and the Zlity Clerk shdil cvise the some to be kublished within fifteen (IE) days after its pasaage,at least once in The Oafily Re__ Ca-ra�, a newspaper of general eircul& -lion p0l�ished :in,the City off' bn'fi�o ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cu ;lmonga, Galifornis. T1 t, RESYD €WI DF tt?DM S 4 r AitQ ... ttt ad ._ , 3« oar -A Sziu� ten.sity, Res�Oential. { "LW Land Use Plan Oesigna�tio Land desi hated �as 'Loatciuta !tensity t�5identtdl is "intendeA` for residential developmen that has a renge of four to eigE,t.o'ac��Tinga per ad,usted gross acre. The fo ?;loping regulations ark Wilicable to these area.; a. Uses `Peraitted: detached 4i attached residentidi r ellings not exceeding eight duet ,Ings `per adjusted gross acre, •1a.- luding: \, but not 1 united to: ; - (1) SM21e family attache,dwdllfings . (2) Single family ai'Sbfied dr�llin$s; including, but not limited to, duplC.,49 and tripiexes [ (3,) Cluster Mousirg f f c (4) "Zara lot line" homes (5)':� CoMMunt -V Facil.tties as'specified op pg. 241. f� - b Accessory Mies Pergritted;. any . Af that fallawi�°g uses`r;Erd y� p ;l.) ,Garages and carports, fin coiilian�dv With the sfit �1110M o�<.* ztandards provided ` herein (2) Fences valls, ar;( trellises (3) S imming ppols with a tainfolum 5 foot high Fence enclosing piral Aceessoa1 uses and structia ►eC - necessary or customarily incid €ntai- to a principal use as p� rv— tied by 2the Rancho Cacam< -094 7dning Ordinance. G« Sate Develop!�nt Standards; (1) Sing] e'Famll CiiiUr Plot dwellings (a) Building site area: 5000 square ,feet minimusa, 5�5t30 square feet ovorse< (b) Bull di rg site width; SO fee, miniAM, it is intended that site Widths will -vary aceordin4 to.lot s(xe. > {d) Suiiding site caverage: varfie '-,dcco-rding �to lot j1 see +,pi al lot: I ;Ia , ply+ 214 -- 223« `` 1 (d) '8uibdingi -setba s: " viries s4c0rding to "lnt =airs, see typici) - lot p5anscaridd �fiable. v I a � e I ell t � �'� ` � ✓' jF `yam+` Y roe uv cc t lT t h 112 w JL N l� viu An ae uwA ai y 4� ye vA S.0 k. 'A 0 `L l - (e) Building height- 35 feel m xfiin[ (2) Cluster ha using (a) Building site area: 2 acres minim= (b) Building site covi�A,gt, '50% maxi (c) B(IfIdIng setbacks: See diagrams for typical building setbaiiks, pp. 214 - 223, (d) Building separations 'See 6 agram for t;71cal building ration di5tanes' Pp. 2 � w 223. (e) Buildings hp#ght :;� 35 feet, maxi"4 (f) Siiidin9 site width and dapthx- As paWt d by reap�f r� setbatks. (g) Privates o Fdn space: M sgmare meek *inimeaa. (3) Innmtive t"Si v (4) ,Building site _.ar"5.; , sgaare feet; wiftfun, COM s ue irot�t aVerage. (b) building ,site cam: ` As peWttld bV regtired semis an4 Private e. 0 Suf din3 setbacks: $00 dia &ao for t*fca:l� ,bui' dins setbackst, pp. amid - 223, - _- (d) wildlij heightz 3�1 feet wa-ki (e) SuilOng site i41� and d=pth As �"rsftted by ' t (fl ovate oW she: 700,sqlare ,.fftt e.nj*, ar r Tree above Std development 3tar+dar* WO!,y.; proletts 04zc are 4'432ed y Innovative. Innovation in single famil y dev4 �Y(11 i�tlNS vi!iing creati.,# design soTntIOns -:Nhfch address the crfWal -taco s '!Of . "AghboncOad caapatibility, dentft tr ri3ltimn, aM{ d i l Yp fnnova$ive 9miects are ch4racteriaed,�-�n atS�'t�S 1� r i^�!`1G CB 4 i Get is _ t,?stous, nor is the strie'k =Ole dow"dw bq' asp(Sa1t /coatic !, gaaa&s; and cars. IRnouat#Vq dasfU -?I Ouns finAity Sr°eaeive1s crate Berl- deigstad sv:; parbfc�ta��4y �tSaitTercE i s I p ' N a° A CC re�i' � 4• cif i jJ 4A R �• r w u jf+ w iti t +� !! 1n !71 � <tr a et a N �.' t � � r Vk 0 0 N ail. IV u f to It a�:, 31 p N GWC Q12I`'G{k1 ca x , Is . r. Ny o a w v u w ta: v es .• y,,.,, t.,. L. I v of c c ni a `� tL .i yi �.. ti'f Y i {.i LL L w f C ate• 'w ;g' M w{x ' t • 1 Js• JA 1% 4 w ;.I 4 i si V .� -- n+w+r rtr: *us: 15 + 1�40ikr,# J,�.:i 1C o; ► �Yplc+Mi dkr+sriAlom O xiC tdtt ti. 9n +w� ,on '' �rswLc, ow �rroa � u ... ' t Ganye: raa,,,g�rpsc rtr3gw� anadc '�'� -cats` P � t r rcrz c � ` '�' f{c;�!a�;!► �°�IQ � �^dn �', � ��,6w� m axt��g ta�� s�ze•._l 1 ,' pt r� Z4 U 1 S� $000 -6000 sx.`il:T center plot q v -. s n v - � ' '- •sue ��° ° I � r M4 {aQ�'R fIC: i�e�' G�ip'sStl� �9fc�iYe.tlJVrM�rigli �-? - o /� 215 "LW LAN13 U - tY*�sl _ 4S .X it. _ I , � � frer� ��wraw� cw dc� "� ` r ",` • � .� rap4it,cro �� p�1rx c, - - �ticm►fs� � _ -_ ; I �+�rs+fcr.w�crn , -i,! ,mot —�" •'_""� i ,I 7. _ �esr%�r' t� �' CtFC�'siE�iaS� a+�nG�tct+tx •zcro�ot•trart'dtrtia ;vws'ui,; ms4 crnmt a Ix 1dt ;- :�� na14s o� fh�C�"•.`ti kilt ixrizcvs ,aswlabJt u�rbk opt z.� o - �? �' � dFtt/�`t�{ »uisixp�x. �.5 �s qtr lot�t.9�ttLst;c), �li yam: su ruprcut Gars satr.�i� sraeudr sl4eyasi., oft; . ta, bktyva^r 4wZ4)S L19 i U 6,-S i F, LOT l,/ " HMO #.nfao�a�?l =•;� ,� �= r3ft�xt'ruwr.C�irr'�r r�arz�,�+i�3w�rnpnx�iE;w,< °C r J, v l -2 _ endo 701 0 o. 4 -13 PC �g a o . r �. »If ilL'i6G[li 1. ya i:ur. . 7. ±iii{i'{!{'Lil�7- _.- ,IRCClS4L[ �.-.- .•.-.r� {i'{+-,— '`^V—�,. -. -._° -:. .�.,..� m.- ,•�....- ._...,71_r—_ 4. MedFum Density- Residential• (y Land Use P lan dPSionatior� }r P,and ;desinated 'Medium %Asity IMMen�tiai '. is ; intendeC-' for res1denVA1 devel6*k* th�t.•ranges frc to 14 vel'inq- ;unfts f' per ad u� d roso ache. ThiP, following regulations 04,app7itabla for these areas. 3. Q d } A. uses Permitted, de=,c ed or attached residentiae i tnys not exrteedirrg fou�^taett drreg'I ings,pe adjusteai gross 'r%re it7l ding, iut not li*ited to. _ t1). 5fngie `faMilYfte1l ngs - Atached or detadbo, including,�� f but not limited to townhouses, tri0ex4`$a fourplexess,. 64 J condomini+ r c 1 f' (a Clus'tee housing Mc Comounitt facilities,, pg. 24.` �t 5. Site vet ,ib SUrAards; Cil Citts:,�r• h�si'ng ; � r (al, Wilding site a4a: 3 acres Iminfi6. J (b) IkOdIq site ca mge-. setbmki and private Open �ei ^F ati'_`dinq szOwks :, .See bieildi09 � diagrams an l fi� fymrlYo�t'tng. ��`'�►Pfcal sera;s, � °' yt separ V buii nqs 3S feet or less in height" 11) ;,"t atie�fa�. �9. buildings Over 35...fe'at in height, 16'Sfle *t minima. (e) ,N NMI" !Semi 40 feet imaxiW . M Building Wf d� andi d + t+r4 ! ' pu tted by �siter tiei. bar ds. R g D Private s �� f�fi eimh�. { C2) Tnfiovaljiue 5ingl a family hakt Sng `'4 , s r.r., f yet i $,00 yt &idir bite api ° rJ s : quat!"feet dVed ti u UTp ``srypy►}} WKK 1! rxs A RE30 OTION OF THE RAWHO Ci1CAWNGA PLANNING CfISSroh R6C €£E IN& A6VAL OF '71 RA VIVA C"WNITY ` PLAN AMEN M $$42" TO'--' M£DIFt THE - L(M- MjW AM 10tlp RESIDENTIAL ,OtjEj(kPMENT STA Atdpg RC4S, on toe 1 . day of tr €T, 1988s the �'lartninq It id a dUly adY2riiseti ' pti4lic hearing Api;rstaant j-0 Section -66064 of the ;mil €forgia Governmat �de. SFCTXdii it Rancho Ctac ingt FIacnn €O' C MIssion has xa4� th4 t 1 'mat'th,� 1 rrclaien �r €il p,,ov €de for development of), co npPenensik "e' y planned urban coomn €ter Vith €a i to 8fstr €ct thV 1 , superior tO 1. aveld wnt other ist< alYcirable u:ia�°7`erate,_ , „ r�gy78f��jst�Sa and. 2, That- the n*ent will vi do f`dr development within tW District in a lanner conSist0ht Vothh the t, UnerAl Plan and with related dexelopt tt and grit nagW2nt'pglfc €+es Of the, Cd de to 3. That sire Amen*** will o construction, Provide ijo the j � €tl*t€'tF�Cettt, �t3� e3tt$n�;`�oT�' of transRortation` fac€'Jftfes, Public, gtilities :6 and Public services required by dgvdlaptgent within the i District. � SECT104 2a The Rancho of!caponga plannfng Co issfon "I'tas found that this prd°iiT'rtot create a signi. €cant adverse effect ctrl tha env €rntacnt and recotwnds to the City Council the €sseanc ef`b gat ve tdcParaApril 13, 1988, t €or nn -, f tow THEREFOR , RE I RE I. That pursuant to, section 6680 to 65856. 6 the Califolmia Goverment Code, Lt the, P1a�trting Corms €ss €on of the MY of; Rancho Cuca Conga Thereby recowends "approyv l of Terra Vista• Canity =Plan Amendment 80-02, ,, t�ttt The Planning Comics €on 'hereby recoeupe d5 that the City 'Caunci +• approve; and adapt Terwa Vita Costmunity, Plan Mendmedt 88-62 to modify the ,Comity Klan per the aU40ed ordinance a r. { e � Ijt•#wryif� V, . I� PLANNING CO MISSION R2SUUiTION NJ. TYCPA 88 -02 "-, CITY £1P RANCHO CUCAi WA Page 2 AWL (`AND APPROVED AD€1PTED TOS 13TH BAY' DP APRII;, 1588. PLANNING CMSSiO OF'THE CITY''I PF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " s BY �r Larr 4 o ATTEST' I; Brach Belie►;, 1 n, of the �4ty o�a � P � afar , Cs�)aeango,. d,& hereby certify that the forego%q ftsolution was duly; and ' r�ularly intmApeed, Passed. 64 adopted by:,tihd Planning CQWjss,ion of the City, Coca" ' .r of Rancho a,; at a rdoglar misting of the Pl nning'Comission held on the 13th day„ of AW 1, 1588, by the following vote-td-wit: AYES, QflF1�fISSTQNERS.a .:= n NOES, ,. ,, CtlbiFiISSI�FiEB ;� _ ■t ..pp��11FFl!��YY �+ pp�� pptt _ •y oABSENS;. bUMISSIONERSi t] �� I v� AOL d.sr.•s,. i .i ,, i .. .�. .. 1' LJ �� 1i i. 4 a. .,_...,. n �ORDINWiw NOS AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ©F -3 Ht�' COCARDWA, CALIFORNIA. AIVI TIC TERRA VISTA t;(lHdAlNII Y PLAN, MOMENT 88.02 TO M4 UIFY�JHE LOW -MEDIW AND 14MIUM RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a` f. i'ha City Council of t14 City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as r! follows: SECTION I The City. Council hereby finds and determines the foliowing: 111 A. lh;; the'Mainning Caaruis ion of'the .City of Rancho Cucaarow4a,, following a public hearing °held to they = c tine and manner prescribed by Batt, reepnds thaV r . t the_Co u:Sity Plan text'amendmeAt,&eroinafttry described, and this City Ccuncil has held <a public hearing in the time and�imnr4er nrescribe� ,*' law and duly heard and considered said recommendmtion. E. That this CoRpunity plan text amn*ent is consistent With the C,ener4t Plan of the City of P'?!ncho Cucamonga,. C. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the Development rode of the City of Rancho Cucama6ga: (� D. This Cammuhity;�,PTan� text amen will have no significant eavlrevental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filea,herein. SECTIO9=2: The Terra Vista Covits P?an ,tpt Parry, "Resr.dential Develop;war'3ia"n3ardx, Low- AiPdiu� Density+ Reidarrtial,� commencing ot� :page V- is fie +weby amended ; t, to read as &ttdchtdp, SECTION 3: to Terra Vista Community Plan ie"it, Part V, "Residential Developmeni�3 n jrds, Medium Density Residential," cornaenciq on, Page V 5, is hereby amended, in`part, to read as attached. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cater the same to be pubTfshed within fifteen (ia),days after its pasaage at Ieast once in The _D�aii�lyy__kd��ort, a newspaper of general circulation published "in the 09ty of ntaria ,`C'aTifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. i � RL _ ^r\ Af ,, v 'fir Zit -0 ' cm t d CCC4iiil�g o 44 44 -MCP ii . N L 1 L, i- ,. r ��. �. ,. � +-' i�► $ tom. �.' - � � r) d 4A,1 uR 6 C �� $ �p S. N Lq d cm 41 q.LOQ qpwt� 4 y IM @! - ,y Ll f�.f"Efk. "wd. g�:a'Ri 11 �i" f(( ►�}� N �' Zt RS)t -. p 3� N hy4i; d 9) C.9� N di-0 "(G _` !' eA p a) N oV $ L:- 1 r MI Z; C h1( r R) N 9) Q C l . id i� �, G- �: �F�► Q•` d `II S+ *a, } ,r $ d $ N w t�.yL O " dg � ®m ` C�'e Cy l O Rt 's)f'+ q► . � � A � v y cu +� �► ro 'riac�iau):vvf� rzc to ttl a 4J d m -40 x C" .r , � to er �`'i °y cr � +s► � � �` r� �, i.% Rf +�f. N U 1_ ar Q4 � I"-L' lF ttf r+ L s. - ♦ A r'C7f C7 9 Y7 C L.0 r to 7S ti7 tC 41 W N '+. HV ►r i O +F+ C 2�. tlE L i� b 67 Cf. CS+ "� `h etl t9= tU• z= 4..aG.�yat,�Ni�' lMasJt trssr 7 %. �L'ames f�.T++r•WN }- a ,� •� q,r-. qt 4+f Q w p, 4 oa a . Neat �t q}F W. i. iTa 4w ` 4t IM u W i .Fa 9f N Od tr ft Q *s: OD 61 } } y 40 W iF• 'ti of -. Y,'' 6t LC.• .0 pp. �, .IG pair V Y Q eN 67h ss" - a 1" d� .r y W pf H ' '... :'.Ril da'4 • p. g i• ii a+r� Q +,n..rw W N 76i O *Fr G b 6°.. �} 4�.p. Gi N C - tj ♦ Q US _ W. 6 �• C O SSS.....rrrrrr W, t 4vY . 7"+� O A O 0 ,p O N .ytF a +w �. CQP Qs� • Q/ C71. li? d O fe 4A � it ��tk 4.6 'Z N w r b 1 a� to •LI �� r r. n• f'$ . '��' .F►. =i. � .L C 71; Lp 0 fW .I OVe CO G S! w t A i Ct 3S 't 9,98000 S tO yf gg I' = 4.1 00 CC M 4A 41 Qi fp . yT� d f71� !�{ Qi 42 N y:.:i, O L4Ji Cf �'s' 111.CL =. eq_ N R ;5 p y� Yf d 4:? '' 44 "CS . j. L F.0 to .r. .G` U u1.i,Q3 O. ti S4 d qQy 'C4' .br. QZ W m 'K Ra C i♦p zpu�- Leb�:OPN \ \v��+ cam. ro V. (� H d0.\ r0 N Lw� �tT Q1 4) 9 y 4,71► 6i L ♦ r r0 Q:,,,„ * i GT. N ttt OY 7• ,a �. � fa m N a. fn •� of �" a tt � i + a 4} ♦p..0 Of+f N Of tl7 L• :3 Cif73 A + tfi' Of �^' +• W N r itl Mi•C C.M.�-� O � Q1��,0i C•+.Y 4 , C C QI d� f'v. �. +. �[ Ol 40 C M+ • 16 Of Rf L L L Ct b ap b,'tf <e• 1'L++ 'C7 rr'tf 'L7 b ttyy Rt E" Q O �.^ •r s+- r 43 .: } ,1 'r '} 1 r r` r 'Ct L L .C' ",'y dire. N .N .►• ..• b tll Q L f7' k+ Z r� -,1"L' •r.. ti. ' Xc " d �I .. 40 . L SR O di di '� 3 •r .iii - 0 :3.4. S Q _jj L C cs hr• v Rf +Q:O L N ;L°} .4] N fk., O• $9 GL 'ta Q CCi. Sf }�iY N,l� rw Pali t9 _ 1 - t � k Al- A.2 4! 43 Ell w 9 N 40 4% t7i ��.1yG1w. Ks'�'" !1! tf! lS d1 qt N O _i. f r Gam? N O. M ,r .,. ° �. to `-►x Js;.> 7y G.2 "' n a, 4z 4A 13 41 N4Y+� et1N cry+C .R R?1- � vim ow :61 „ 1 16 7C im rA A ;s .. G 161 �q O! {q3 !LQ Ilx ap �7 1' f - O 44 j b; a v- a M a tCD a a RAE 31 1 T Lp o LLL xv of cm aim rt r1. ey N. N;W, c", m In Ln : - '� rd O . tt1 i;S. CS art V to r. ItL L 4 ��> � GR ti' �• ILL S2S: a� � H w N A y •��1 , ,m iX to O � � cwS.l d '? y idy is ti. a 9 CC C. V N I M r N CA �� 3e ti o • • � �.. �,•t �... �,ii• LN to N to M 7D 03 / a ;aL N tV M M M W O aZ In p' O M m C r O a Vi'tQt M m 41 r* M°` iL3 �y cm da a Q CJ+� /6A CL Gt 44 .aC �y Lam+L q sue. lL t ' p"" '+�► 'C8 "- C 0 " U #. 0 3 %A" d h. •r• ;,' y.^� ftrt,��6 -1CV.A G L r 4s t% vL t. " a ' m . IWO It €: ` b t�ii N C fibux bf±n, o to _ 1 11 , ia CA Aa, vt 4A.0 4J C �� 'ectci a► a m. ar 44 .. fQ L. rt� U ds p, a i ay w ►s QO q Sf tQRy ` M � 9? L QqWff Im th, r? ,G C. *"4 G G #G-A C* A.1 C GS l C 1Y 4.1 i ,' W L W 4- 1rt K1 t{7 t? O M+ a' 11 f; � M1. 7 L. it S' RR11 ra Lppa. N N d?`.1 i+,. wt G: Wl ilt Ci A;.._iN . � Cam. t�j"O tM slim fU N s. as '. i* , t ,' Mi Q] . � N •e., a, M,, s w ,c}, N. fh• $ � � 'A� � s °' ""''a• �6 � /'� �` c tom' � IV St" ,fNp C/s IF yt l+ =O 'ja to eNrt" b�, sec aL+en id c a�a °®,m bt u �F �; t101 ay •H � 59, 1 U f LLitS y'�'e' L 3+ 'o ,.' s of ° ( L {p� xd. P��i.:'ir �1 �,�,^•�rp� ado r s.+ L PYCI,� ,g,t a7: '�. 4w - V 6A JAR k�3 -j . %... tS iiO.� aM �\ CM C 16 g�, U+lkNY7 V} 4� L '>h• L N RF ih t>' `� N! At = °t') i •�. to la CL .0 v" i 4„7., ,a'^ o: �s tea° .y tom• C •.A 1 ". -0 � ,o. A - 4 'A y' tea r- & rv. �- �. ,e,, e • t et at lu X 40 t: i �! it _ b C N t7Y- 'ni+!SC 1q N ,.5 O Ov0.,,CLO O"a, C Z 0 l #- t, .�0 o � s ", , E � atoa b V1 4.3 ,r 4 19� 't9 ®7 tom.. � � � •t+ � �. 4�i ,O �� N 41 fJ'1 N.. •r r S. L {�� ,4W q,1 tQ nw L T = 1 67 "'� :{n ko . C W .Y vH at Iv _ a 4w 4o . !e w cAl L9) to cm Lei tlw* LV. C9 cam' ji LCD t9 W .0 :+0 2E N O • •c 0 �; a -2 T W o u .4 V-1 A `iyL`Ti LCS too aid 7A . At'44! 71 h•1 Ad M '( �,. Lfl A N ,- n �. C W 4R a.► N � La co p ~ CA ur . .7y. ►a i CL N ti- a sr i a a® a i °J 4) W o L7i m M / C.di R aa u7 �I N c '�' a > V 03 y% cn =W= i '". , was Cl 4-1 e car CL U a 0 44 i e' n �x* « r LJ !j� i L 1 ! ..t lfe a: �• -� �.. �" �. A� � i rr 'f .,k:..: -- Ya= YMP`+":A.�- r,.. _` � � • ri^� . r�i X ,i� yr ,� _, 40 43 wt Cl C U44 p. A( S, C *ia. ��'g'" ` •n � ' gl �, 61 .�w - s��,Dq ° L�rr ' 5' '104 r 44.1. L.i r f +rs lip �s ar • *ro ►9 4W l�.'i tR b q ti. C CF L tC y� .,4 ��'�rig1 ;R 4"1al*�, � a C � ,,�h p.G 4• � wK3 ` 4t �I'w'y1w?�S • �' 61 :ie SO � �t vo i+r Ti f .. ILI yyy s :/4+51 +f +� ,^ 13� Qlv�gwk9 ,..;t(� • ,,, Cg1f W y �•� 'x !6i � �`+4� r+'�� 1 � �Me6�G as wF-� 0'� is M+ M will }� rw %441 Sq � � �! �'a�! • ryw �`! , p3� {i ,�f � AggB' Gk lY Gi .Uk 1j1' � � "C1 '►+ rJ iiJ' .'t'1� �: rt+ +�► '�. w.+A it� `a �t, � �� C � Q w�. 'tOtO ��a �� C: iK. �+� �. �.. U �. wN is y I , �� ,.9 9 �i_ - W 1 W X.'y!•r �i/! � L tlf� dJ O' t�''�0�}}? QJ� Cf - ,�...� of Q�.P`# �� L s �j H 6►�" % �'� N L�'CyA V Ste. �Cg %h'� O �.aa �,t� eP,, yl .� •As ' � � th � - � � eLp` ,rs � � - yam+ e � da �y IM44 CL �4A 11,1 p, C KS tU 'S: V.CS. yyr Qj tF `t.s R ill ul f.ly�_ 'tl .0 ii�� 1lFi g ty: fe -ld W W,�g :'%`� /C9 � �:W p7 4t9 rtf U irCf _ _ ii! :5.. "n to Sa y W W L L Cis � � r � � �. a t"rrA.0 ,p '� !1 N V R1 N.W lA.;r W W L CyBq�`}yaG^}'Cij R! .G �'e�^ W qr�}y tS► a c as�seWis`x.clgr�Wgr�a �W �,.;$ 16. - G7 a+ O to, A r.. W A .0 1114++ O. � 7. �O 0.++ W � Ko " ?; V as vy�i a f' O N r' g 5 J Ln r,+eC- �d •L 't t9+ �e- All, tl[ to i,Ri • Zi jo, &'o ,L4 .� RS per' �j my, tCV u i r t ,� ,1� ' �r F t-tLb .•t c w.1yC � �C u b a"!W QtCa J rO " •� Ot} 6O L O ► LiL r ' �iQ _ 'NO yy a O d COL 40 !O ' QO C qG � _ w.iC�J ! { '. rr - {O L �di l� '�rL ryi i1 •M 4•vfLG - � d r '61 tl dJ • . .[^ pC� . N iQN d } ? GO ! V .M. $ .r } C 06 . .I.iQC C i.% + y r O 0 � � Wo � p yL 'C b t 90 3 tj c ,� 4; Q _ : rT^ d" 6i 1 , .1 I 1I ' ,p yy c' ,p r yL 47L Ot9 N $ N •ca.�� a RY atws.� =,, 1 S. to iJ ,a. � •O'aG <O- C N S"Y y 0... •w CT . OZ.= qj t c ay .aNf. 4t C iJ. aY @! `. T°i k � � 4 4. qM1 �, 81 y CS. C tJ S! M �M :ii CiI Laj� O d tw1 M M! d V tLf M% M M Q gr� .a j C. > �A. 'Ina . d. + g� eg�H. Y�•�' _ M -4 Q3 = +M V 9.. two -0 fL d :_ c'J 6�j+�6' �I w .-.�+.4 L 'C� «- G ys..a w- .t. ;.y�.<i+: ,Q„. C tq. •F? ¢> %t to O aa �{L ID CO ? S9 y VA 17� 6L+ ti9 i/1: - ffiL .8 y - flF y N O FA O o k5w =0 Id�i A f"I mw ".0 a L...�s.4 >rs.r�s ro +.> auJ �� y � C 4�:t�. w'Oa�N tr Ru LA r nbO y A. iJ M �O tit 1(�iff+!l A Cl 49` O ter- ,G i G iii ti•- N 4A #► Off" M 76 t? iJ iJ LJ t3 iJ r N y. R•% C ti 16 hL 6S r0 ej q- t ��1 ..�. • S �` �Ii 4t LU ,C OP d i G:`1 47 67 d n'f� �,1��r X W.� CJf O c'rt.t -• LJ r"''E, jII7FY, n CN �� tnnL�' 4 gow M E 4 >� M ",-. C L g► Q *� t" C Sip 4 Nf - °•Q'rJ I "- e 7 Cam! �} y O1y w� M t+•• .� -92.r+ M19 L1 rr _ i. N 4- _ N O. I7t tGr7! -•t-w tt f9 L. O 9L �` L9.t*� w C I r d {�w "a y cn QJ. �y ,O, y 5w C.1 fQ L� : C7.rM► a•-• O. - N C'•+F� �_ U� 04 Q C dJ •6gJt— C6 p th V w°'"` +' d yM, Ct1 t'�T y, 'S 1.6 'G '+�T u7' �ay� Rt N in tai �J o. yam. s Co J,J O 79 L Lh� @., 1l! '�'t IAN 6.:. w �. •N� ti`s d 67 L° wd Q! O M w- N O O9 L .} �O O/Lw.fSa 4!`'S1 i/f LL' .., N 7•�G':. : L e to K y w 4 w dJ c}t w C` , aL �,-.:: •• y, .R^ S <•. Iti. 6633 rtl 'fL�• y ; •r- ' N L � e :.c �'Pw a iya5 m +04 CU air' Y �c u RLR9 L. .n.ii +t?,pi iU'�'a v -.e+ Ct�a Ql tai 40, -CI. L.3t C6. �{M CF-'Ci N►. 61 Lb 7w .'9 �r a Z p°. 4j R e „'� a . rskr i , C(� N IV }r � QS M 17 w• i.t. a d.O Q! iO 0 ;^„ 'L! C N " a j •C 13 c nL I �n STAFF REPORT DATE: t`:�ri l 13, 1 � U 1977 70: Chairman and timbers of the Plann '3ig Commission PROM: 3,ad Buller, City planner tiBY: Dan Coleoin, Senior, Planner SUBJECT: EIdY' ASSMl6w Awn SIB mn?uAtiC tiA&tENOFtE�iT `88• ar ous gn Hance ,.rage ng neon sigoi - ndorr signs, and temporary signs for .City, sponsored softiAl ev(Mts. I. AB This report presents certain changes to the Sign r nanse as directed by the City Couw -il in 'response to recoomendations from the Chamber of Coerce. II. r�,AUGROUND: The Sign Ordinance prohibits signs 'with .exposed much as neon .signs. in resp a to the ,ping proliferation of these signs, the Alannin9 tviiAoat conducted a surveyr in June of' 1987 and determined that iffy ,ititij .businesses had illegal neon[ signs. Most "of these si s we,rie small signs advertising "open ", "Coors" "Pizza", e that' hung in the storefront window. Letters ''were sent out to�orming these businesses of the violation and the need to comply �Ath the sign regulations. Commerce. Several businesses contacted, the `,Chamber of The Chamber of Commerce created a task force to review the City's , Sign Ordinance and to make recommendations for possible #angel in the Ordinance. The City Plantiner and staff participated in several meetings with the task force between July, 1987 and October, 1987. The Chamber of Commerce re�commmmendatiors were prestilted to time P ?tning Commission on January 27, 1988, The Chamber's reel %mmendationx, together with the comments of the Plannin/ Co fission, were presented to the City,,Council for direction 0 FebNuary 17, 1988. The City Council directed staff to'prepare alternatives to the Chamber recommendations and highlight sedtions of the Sign Ordinance that may warrant changes. Staff presented concepts to allow neon signs and modify the winnow sign regulations., for the City Council -'s considerations on Knith 1d,� 1983, `t'he Dity Council concurred with staff's recoinmendAians and "directed staff to Prepare this amendment accordingly. T ANIL �— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM4ONGA I �.iro J ST"F R Ott %° DATE: March 16, 1946 - ;, TO: mayor and tl r�, of the city C it t FROM: brad 6ullerF, City Planner By \ ; "` SUQJECII SICti 'OBCYfi+NCBt�i$ec ai rhan9 ia protosad by Chawftr of� ~' Gamrco Hued frolo februery'17, 1*4) t� RECQiWNUT10,t.. Stiff "COMMMdS thet the City CoUr4i1 arie Mod CORIT er "alternatives discussed in this report and provW direotio" $* sUff try pi Part eiaary a!�l411ont9 to the Sign l Cawl was s sea+ aed +t3 th the. t:aa Aak �rer s . reco a inns 4!Arding n=on signs ,and afRft Aftns at their :aeet ng of FehruaFYV 1.70 ,19". The tomil raised the following 6014��i`ns; 1. Sig-lip Shgjd ralat4 to the land use /zane. i Z. It +ao,resiribtivo, Sign regulations can hurt business. 3. CofQrs, teri,�ls, aid Maintenanc of window signs should 00'. addressed. After consider°ab1 " "e �"°rscr �sfi®a+. #hs Csty tpounc4l �ontimad this ire to allow tht comncf - #ie t0 rexi taxi OOnsidur the infn�tion A sent+sd. �rhe ouneiJ &I f4 duetted staffi to highlight Sastions \� of the Sign OrdhAace that my ner# aaWaftnt. : III,. AMU6YStra: _;; A. rouha This ree rt ,� presents alternative Solutions to , a ress the City Council's concerns and the recoMndation , I Of tht .Chafttr of UmmarCer r1garding neon signs and rincia Signs. ` The solution to the ssuss is tm_fold, 1, Education - A Reagotive apbroach is needed to educate -fho usb°" ni' e�ss owner, of the City`s sign r+agulations and advertising op&Vrtunitie3; CITY CQt{NCL;S't,Kr E; SION QROWNCE March ld, 1988 Pa9s g a, The 11 kilmest Guido being prepred by the Cheer cif ,Coaaarca axPlains the City °.s 4ign Process and thould be iM da available to their 1*0vshipt particul0V new ambers.; The City C"ncil covild increase s fft parzit fear by 42,00 in 00r to prGtiide a CWr of the Sign Ardinanco to aRlt bull nesset"Otth their apPticattah package. br center asa,a wed the Cha*w it Co morct s! d :eta ae Ara tine approach in educating their hers /tena►�►rts 'opor#y, INN— ers conterning Promotional cawpacgns and :advertising the Practices to let rosidentf, knew of their` goWg and servicos and wheys o find 0100 A shopping deter Omar Wand /or "andfar sold` words with his t ats fn develaPin J01% adrartiMng and sWiael sates sir prat #era . events - ail' the tenants war a together, amns w?ii advertising beftfit At Mrrni cost. Skiff W€Natd recom "d that Z Cos UOUS apProauh be taken in ending V w Sign► Ordintrxe. Chtnges r 1 the Ordinance sh®uld be considered as "fins"`. -Ingo j rather than a - major overhasl "r Aesthetics «'the ; issues rotative„ to tjpes of 4110W.06- STI-H-3—aw Of stimi,irds f'ar $Ut and design are bsst f addressed by tbking a Cautious approach.' Sfaff =' raca+�tocts that 5t is changes to ti4 5i n Ordinance be attOWted first Gat results aaonitbre to if see the changes address Ida:= cdnCerns of the Gomil and she Tho, section of this ar . report highlights areas of the 910 ordiam"es Vhors changes my be � tgprespr #sect. S. potential ndeentss g Ut $ Now st s nding tlx sign' Ordinance to aa`ntttt It no a ti IQ Gutter of 'rifting the bat Oft, new►n. ltasre are two .or concerns r0garding . ,-the use of +eased noo►i tubing: 11 at$thetics an,4 2i safaty� ti Staff be, oves that %t ae :thaetics or `quality* ` quail ty of nron signs can be :de cuftely cgntrblied through the ` sign <, permit process, as are tither typos of pamm"ont signs, and by adapting design guidelines, The issues of Safety ace relevant to winder or other neon signs suspand�rc�n Midair, interior w,tY7- eaunxsd, and neon signs with open, expoiO4 tubing. Generally speaking,; expcsrd tubes are '�. fragile and can be broken by high winds or physical contact. rmpeoper, installation can also result in fa rd " 4 r (�. 9 =� CITY tOUNCIL STAFF R .RT page - .. t ntial, The issue of safety is discussed' at iongth fer j the mach" sift the city of Wt'k Covina (sere E001 t "P), ,,. 1, Staff r+eCOlallerFd3 `' t the fallowing standards be � coes td:ersd for ax�Carnai r08 signs,. ° , a. l,04 their use to nerve intense coeesrctal ,zones, such a's: i fi '' nal Rel d rtfal J Regic"I Co ore t1 ht b• wir9e totally am loud ifttallshfin a. Mithin sPwppfng Mtors, alloer as a P", t of a Udfform Sfg�t py��- , d, ° Suathess tftftti ffcaf ci� only Irr'.er+aosf 1 �f apt SEM loca"d in the Ste" nr'm vas Issues: relative to aesthetics <; Safety I4s ae "PRIl ntdtd nron sighs. OR to ddEtiOR there is` ct micera t�itfd the r of signs, . content, and st ". 5 sold t ft=vdn4 thst faliorving standards be ctnsfdsr#d for neon -- window signs; a.'�' Lfmf t,the9r use r. '(' Mfel i"i as, GAY = t. ReqUt'4 tctal?y enclosed,inattallatiian �. ft sf Vb sq. tt Oft st P ct=aq e11000— or Wsimess naves enut be ganerr c,} ssashl s "Olar� dr NOW* = 3. Vir Sign Ordinance recognizes tt nd for W , hd" signs for cer'tafn dverlEse s ial 'selej`� the t,rit of wines es to �sixi vioiaetitlras ate= regarding the (61 � f'vont might` limiumo: M the currofit reg�alMOns whiCh the Chaaeb*.r orooaxos to +elintnaU, in addition - Cot:nci ,: snd IoW" ion have expr+tssld concern with the aesthetics of wirer signs and the length of time they are displayed. lft Partftulsr� there "try oh,�eCtions � fterusCen� , ColOrt used in painted eir4ft" signs and the 1aCic nt- ►"a4u ations governing hOw long thly say be ""'played. oak 4 St>tff mould reC 1� end that the ; #allorfng standard �rb0 ° considered for window signs.„ a . . CITY MINCaL S r REPORT � RE. SIGN ORATNAKE 47 ` = t torch -lt , -I page 4 T a.` Limit their use to,, retaij q �ql Wrles only s ' tfexfee�o Tbejgi % 1i[eif * 20 fast v Allow or t6trV d�'�t /wren 4 t /S�+l��° Colors must be-r tibl,# bu 7+iing daesi tatdrs Pew signs shGal� ple4djo, famik spat rs9wf r City A nn*r � - � zo; F Die cko Attachments: Exhihit W' - lktst COViM4, YAM StV4Y C�� Exhibit 420 - Nam stir Exhibit "C" Wij*w $#rW ° Exhibit 400 - 1p ot, Comp#ivi #,i Zp*,s „ Exhibit "E" • Sj ,j"4rc,e 0 0 4 _ of 5 f„ AN ORDIKANCE.OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROM Ho CUCAt9W. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING Staff ORDINANCE AMENDMENT' 88 -0i f A MINS UTLE 14 OF THE R- ANCefr2 CUCMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MOOMt, REGULATIONS FOR REON AND W.rN4lm SIGNS` AWADDING PROVISION LQR iQMPORAtiY SIGNS FOFt CITY SPONSORED SpEcr& EVENTS -w The sitar COUncil.'of'the City of Rancho Cvcamonp'does ordain as fol l ows, r, SECTION 1e Section 144.08.030 of Chapter 14.08, is amend0d to tread as follows, '�$h yordi And graphics: 14A1.0 Area of sigh. , "A -ea of sign "' $hAYH be como�ated :tiy nclt3dfi�ig' n e" re area ' ° n a'Single, continuctu5, jvoilirea4r pp;�faieter of not a re than eight straight lines, or a circle or an ellipse, enclosing the extrt limits of tine pritin , r reseDtatfidn g ep emblem, or ®then dis l�r, � } together with &W material or color forming an fategrai hart of the bac Ground of the display: or used to diff'ereritiate the site: Ma the backdrop of structure against which it )s; placed, but not indludinj';anac supportir 4 framework or bracing t}ta ,s 0430Y incidental to the display itse'ifi� In.. the 1 case of a tyro - sided, multi - Sued, or three 'dimensional zi r, '+ t "i be � � . the �re4 =sR,�t computed as includi.pg the maximum single dfsplaty surface Which 14 sri5161e from any ground, - Position at One time. fta At" '®MallOmffi`if A.1NrliiDi Mwq!:' C>ipiYT � 1Cna{®IMYI r f Oign Are *# CITY COUNCIL ORnlONCE CIO. RE: ORR. Mew, 88-01 Page 2 r 5EC7IOSi Section 14.omso of Chapter 14.08 is rtded to rea& as I4y0$',030 3iin r ►t, "�lindoar ai n" means a sign PaintedA attached gluedm'or o erg sea st a rains#oa op iocatod within ibra , feet of +; interior - sidefe ;udecr or 0th ;. se= .sit, ,risi4le $rora :tlst exterior of the building. l SECTION 3; "Section 14,10020- srabsectiAn i3, Of Caap�r 14,1 i5 amended to rsa3"apllorr, , ti. Signs in Che �►ullic rl= ht -of except Where required by 4 ., governsincar age�;cy or,,oi Ise ; pa it tit7e;u " SECiIi}�! 4. on b4 "670 is add(xd to Ct1ap#er 1+�,Tbftct read as fol loans• ---- w-. -. - G.r 4. r 1 * //9�TT�Y but within, `i 24s16.yl Si Ong r ht,af'+�a •. a� e use #'� temporary flags . r� banner g, s gnS, an pennon sCr?0 lrrs"��ie following provisions;.3 A. ti %ited is special ev±nto sponsored - -by the MY of Rancho CucJeanga; 8. .,The PIaciment shall net create pote�itidl public safety hazard; The signs must comply With the California %liicle i , Code; D. The approval Of the pity Enggir�eer*os� his designee required prior* to installation, SECT201? 5: " '�—° follows.- Section U.2b.042 ,is added to Chapter 14.20 to read as A,20442 Window uparary �irda�.si ns " si . y be'approMrons and thoso cenUU64in Section 14.ZOd� .' JJ fj o. vasubject r r A. Pesittact In rsial zones'onlyp f3. Colors rsuast be coq ble with buildlog architecture," C. Window s #gas shall b limited to 30 days Ptr. sales event; Four such so, s events shall be Permitted each calendar year. Paper signs are entauraed,to be Mounted in hanging frames for a more permanent appearance. WWI .' �uo.' CITY COR► & ORQIItAHcE R €: SIGN ORD, ANEND. BB -01 _ Page 3 SBCTIOA -t Section 14.20.0701110f ChsPter 14.20 is aMended to read as„ �f fo,Iows: 14.20.070 ikon SS s exterior. ,Neon tubing way be perr,,fA? as a ?` Si n eater a ex r or mo VXF s c , fo� lowing provisions: ° C,�s and wall signs subjec�o t A. Peraitted only in tyre -ire in se coftercial zones« Communiky Commercial // Regional= Related CapnArldal Regional, CrciaT, y B� E'xfosed. tubing `is pro %"ibited. Neon tubing" shai2, be fWlY enclosed in a metal frame, and cohered Vth plexigla�i:: , C. Within shoppin cGnterS, neon signs r at Y"b* Allowed 4 only as part o c�,Uniform -sign ProgrMW 0. Such s,tgn5 shall be lia►ite3 k,iness 'iderti icatio flnTY, ant! may fc. nude graphic symbols. SECTION 7; Sfttior ar 14.20 071 is added to Chapter 14.20 to read,,as follows:. -`.� _ 14 20.171 l�on si ns interior Neon tobin r-ign mater "a g aK1Y be permitted as a 4, n er or win ow s gns subject to the fallowing provisions; ; A. Permitted in coRerwial zones °only ;, R. Exposed tubing I� Prohibited. gion "fling Shall be fully ,enclosed in a metal frame a cdVered with plexiglass. . {d C. No more than one neon wind* sign shalt be permitted Per business. D. ITVr sign area shalt not I.. eefl two square feet and shall not exceed 20 €ee in height,above finished grade. ; E. Srch signs shall be limited to generic m$r ages, such 'OPE ", as or, "PIZZA". 96 product advd "rtistag) M business. identificatijan is allowed. it S1-C7iux 8. 5ectiorf �d.20AW of Chapter 14.20 "� amended to read follows: as 14-20, 080 Rermitted si inns_- _�_Resid�ntaal Zones. The f los�irrq� signs may be pe a e res en a xot nes su' ec lie o pro ix ans listed: (Chart remains uhChanged) Fes. ='� ...a._a_.. � ........ .... .�,_. G Qua* o � � TS l� of. fl, Iar—it - if gig i_ �r ,l S �.. gill 911 1 - x4 .I IS lei i4 c „ fib, Jill al p - g ii s r} �a s s s ,f , ? L ■ 'All Ir el 5 Vi :L _ v: CITY OF RANCHO CUC ONGA k-UREP0 April 13, 1t0 ts�7 f " TO: Chairman &V ars of 04 Planning Cowission FPM: Brad Boiler, City Manner t BY: Dan Col+mian, Senior planner, f �� na1r, :rrr.rr�a�.a`a'a41aL 'xaaY- t_D11K[. I. BACXGRdUNb• on F&ruary 10, 1+088,, the Planting Caiission direoted M $-prepare an interin policy to eta a consistent treatment along) tha Foothill Fri rri CodoK'D This policy direc�fiio0 Was based up" Previous-Ascussion by the C fission (1 \� consgrninq the need to strength t14 iWe and identity of Rancho " ? Cuaasaarega.k Specifically, the.Cowission fxpressed dissatisfaction with the *11tworla wail appearance along that corridor, that is being pirpatu4ted in newer projects n RC" £ia€TAIC: Staff recon that the Pl nt�ta Cograissttttt a op rra"athed policy Resolutio:" ca'r7cerninga`W lls along the T `erothill Freeway corrid4C. Res lly submitted, Or S r City, nner� 88*.DC•te Attachment: Resolution ell r A 'RESOLUTION OF THE PV _1NING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WHO POLICY �£ l•�� WALLS ALONG THEE FOOTHILL IFREEWAY� J CliIPIDOR, WHEREAS, the Planning Ctwission finds it desiarable to promote a consistent wall appearance along the ForW11 Pre"ay corridor to strengthen the image -and ident ty ref Rancho Cucamonga ;_and ER's, the PTanaing ,Ca"ission finds this Resolut,�* necessary to give property owners and developers notice of this"Policy. � N(N TNERV- E, BE LT RESOLVED, that the'Plari4Mng Co"Iss on of, the City of Rancho C.u;cacoilga does hereby declare their p;;4tcyt' wise d. That a consistent visual a;Ip'rirAnce shall be provided along the future Footh '1 Frees corridor (Route $01, through coordination 5 malt treatments. 2. that all l new developm eft adjacent to the future Foothill Freeway corridor (Route 80) shall design their wall tr'ea"t abutting the corridor ll be compatible with fire su;roundIng area. = APPROVED AND ADOPTED 'HriI i= 'DAY OF APRIL, 1988. PLANNING C TSSIO(+' 4F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA l BY: Larry r. 19FUNI, a rman XMST: Brad Duller, Deputy ecre ry I, Brad Buller, Deputy. Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plannin C, is$ a of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planting Caission held on the 13th day of April, 1988, by the following vote -to-wit; AYES; COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; r ABSENT; Cti35Slfl�ii5: ' .; n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FDATE. April 13, 1988 thatrman and Me*ers of the Planning Mission Brad Bullet, City Planner Cindy R orris, assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 11401471 13059 DESIGN REVIEV - WILLIAM LYON 1%s g v or- oul id%a eldvation$ an,, pct plans for two, previously approved tracts consisting of 16 the fait ly Tests > T`�ated on '7.1 acres of land In the �ov density dent x district [3 -4 dwellings units per acre) la a..ad Meese of EtiMrM110 Avenue,, north of Base Liao Road and south of Highland Avenue and associated with the project is Tree Removalt FtrMtt 88 -08 - AP* 227- 49- 53 -56, 1227 -47- 61-66, 227- 48 -66« I. PROTECT � siTE DESCRIPTION: . A. Actigsn Reg�kestedr +�p:oi+'al of building elevations and plot ans. B.• rpjoct_ Uensity� 2.1 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding t.and Use and:2onin z ROM g an revue; ng e Family Residential, Very ;Low - Density Residential J1 -2 dwellings per acre) South Proposed Mixed -Use Conmrercial /Res denttal; Community Service East - Scattered existing Single P'antl,y and Church; Very Low Residential Density (14 dwelling units per acre), Loan Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), Lot- Medium Density Residential (44 dwelling units per acre) West - Sin 1e Family Residenial; Low Density Residential (2- dwelling units per acre3 c; O, General Plan Designation: ro, eci i•te , ow DensTV Residential� 42 -4 dwelling units pMr acre) F North - very Low Density R, Odenttal (l--k dwelling units per acre) r^uth - Low Medium R041dential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) tieightrorhoa4+ Loa�erciaT East Very Lowe Dens'ity Residential (1-4 dw*lling units per acre) Low Density Residential (2 -4 ` dwelling units,, E 4 per atre), Medium Density Residential t4 -8 dwelling units per acrel _ West - Low Density lesidential42 -4 dwelling units per acre ~ k MIA U A s C�{flyiSSTON REPORT P „ANNING TR 13027 b 13052 `DESIGN R£YIE41 - i[k1 LYt1!! April 13, 1508 Page Z E. Site Characteristics: the site is currently �► man South �eThe r prox awa e y o three percent free Norm, pads have been rough ggraded and the cpunfity trail to the rear !of lotj; 145 a^ad 157 already improved. II. &LYSIS. l/ AliSack round- 'tie subdivision design and grad': for the 15 lots WaVI revIlrb�sly wpR►'ov Zsa approved etas par of 1 tentative ining lots were 13052. lots Gry and I3, 1985, while txte re�a e� 11, 1955: Tract 13052 on NOV e+aber approved as part of Tentative Tract 1?427 on Doc n B. General. The is proposing a► total of four floor a 48?,,, ,squ re p ans .acluding. reverse plans) g* n.si:�e ffrbi« e1erratidit . The homes are all two story o �� Tanga rafK hay only ,fide sntry feet to 3,130 square R Flan garages. while Plan 2 has only front, sntry Oawages.�, e Ocsign Review C. Gesi n Review Goa+ei2teeR 0n t3si^cch 17$ ,1958, ,o ect and mm e rou t! i;Tiiiea, EerickY revi�endations: found it acceptable based on th"foil�riP9 1. The Comitiee recoMended that a fenti alo E w� 9d the use of equestrian style Avenue. Tht, apPlic3nt has expressed a desire V) use Ord r !�hite p.v.c. co�nmunityr equestrian fencingtoian -b ;�he define the prbPosad hom s fog raarketirg* here, Howevt architecture and to vide a rural at +sp estri'0 staff is concerne+< a the use of the standard equ fencing for the f�liowing reasons: a. This fencing has been consistently used onl,,L in This with the develoPent of CrJXhity his -ice Equestraan trails throughout the City 9res the consistent with City's General Flan ahih regcl development of a standard trail design a fragment early delineate coMMUnity trails and to prevent inconsistent trail pat+ —*M. b. With titP 7 a °° ��;ue bike n trail its intersection yt tihact�tie r\ to Etiwand theme use of _ CO-IwMni ty Equestrian try -, a Highland,, Et wn a of d be standard equestrian fend >.9 g —. misleading, iving rise to 'Potential use conflicts; and, c. The Etiwanda Soecific p3an design quidelines call, for a and o not unified a s f ncin`g P 5j ent to the the COMUnity a Trail show, any (although peen fPncin9 less than 4 feet in��heignt,� ; permitted). a _ tJ v 1,' V PLANNING�COM ISSION STAFF REPORT TR 13027 it 13052 RESIGk REVIEW - WA LYON April 13, 1988 d ��: The fencing may - interfere with `Jive- af�site mi ibfity at driveway. M : a result,_ staff suggests that either fencing sufff0entry AYfferent f dm a standard otr l design be pro vi�, or that ifis use slang the V1 trail be elimina�pd al6,91thtr. 2., The Comittie found the use of eirsutan drives a ccep able With the possible exception of the northern mist lot,,'Whi ;h "requires a haimrhead driveway due to drainage cornstrVnts: f� a 3. _Archiitecturii ele!Lalts -C�.e. door,Tirind- .4 detail s, etc.Y:�, ' should be modified 'sligOtily on Oach Chg` -1S Uril s in order to create a custom home feel to tfid, pro4ect. 4. Native idoe should be used rai or than ►aanukfactsared st6e veneer. 5. Architectural dotailing should be 'pro � on all elevations And ar y include-4indow treat nt� *,,. eta �1in11 a � or veneer where apprnpriiit6. erfng,$ o9� film: r:6 Sed� idi r and rear'elevatlons sf�al7 be pmide�' by the app ifdant to be viewed at the Planning Commissian. meeting.' Q. Tree Remp"J. Tle applicant is nappesting the removal of 7 ueasup u` Ius trees Five oV the trees are to be remised a%e to 0-"stealth and - fot0y/°while1 "`two are confl�cting driveway locations. Pursuant to ti�2 Etiwanda Specific Plan, the trees shall be replaced with M,\ Euculpytus. Camaldulenses (Red Gum) shall be gallon size. E. Equestrian Use: {�`r tlanta `to the Etiwanda Specific 'plan, equestrian use is permitted only in the Equestrian L Overlay District" or directly adjacent to ' a Com wL m;ty �Nu�p,strian trail. AS, Iots 22G and 221 do, not meet thesh criter;rland are less than 2h acres in size, equestrian ''use (I #e, horse`lseeping). u�il!` not be permuted. The remaining lots have a C"IMunity Equestrian trail to the rear. Y f F. ,,Fact,LI�F�= din s: This project is consistent with the ~4 flwtn a peci c an and the ,General Plan. The project will ! not be detrimental to adjacent .properties or cause significant environir,opnta! impacts: In addition, the proposed use and site r plan, together With the recommended Conditi6s of Approval;, are,' in ..compliance with the applicable provisions of thetiwandan apocirxc Plan, nevelopment Cade and City Standards, r ItIry CS� 1�P" .7: � r �,H�A � % ,�� j`�t+s'`� §!E • 1 �H -+ice+ t�� {� s. f� ! `� t � M�41i}7P/l4NCE v xYr.. h'Y. wa+pl+rnn,.n.nauvmn.! `61. � L, 4 +a ssoa al.Me,.,+vo.vu tu'.eaa * TRACT 13b2r tpTS. }<s • 1st TRACT 13052 LOTS 224.224 DETAILED SITE PLAN i THi iLYONOI4�[3NY P► u �.u®asr .n,r ETM4xNt t A 7} rl �w ♦, I yr,w CITY O r.� ITEM: RANCHO CUC-k,'lvjoNGA', _ E HlBlT- SCALE = -, ? xdt 0 Ordinance No. �, pertaining 10 ! greaerroatiort of tnirs ass r - no person NMI remQYe Or YeIDQ$te an private pr , rs4ukww that` - y woody. plan � in ewoetarcat lftemm ft" h) t�e4maind hem a single trunk Q circumference of fifteen (1E) lncho3l'7r more and muitl tnlakm havFlig $ ciMunlferert+re of thirty Inches or more (measured twentyfo1ul Inches from ground WW), vrltha% first ob�jainino a Treed . ' Removal Pormif from the city. LOCATION OF'SUBJECTSIT& It`�randa 1�4°Atl�$l�..:_f ; lie �Ot¢� 04 Hiah�.a i s t` NAMFf ADDREM TELEPHONE OFAPPLICANT: „ �M _ 8540 lrcltibeld Suite 8. ;Qh* Cnest w ' W NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPEMCjWNEl~ #f � REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary shoats): t?aea treear are to be removed either bacrataset, of nor ford or beaauaea then are aslreadr_ dead. Uj One tree i &_ in conflict with s dr vp ay locations. PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL i aawt z APFLICANrs SIGNATURE: DATfe: 41 N I (� This application shall include a plat plan Indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The species, n*nber, And size of the trees,to be removed shall be so designated. If a tree is diaeased, ® then a written �atement from a licensed irborist stating the nature of the iiiseasa shall be required, .. . W ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED °y` Reasons: cc Date: �l Notification of application shall be eve�'+ 9 c property owners within a three hundred foot radius ten dad UP prior to approval. If no appeals are received, then the permit shall bftortili effective ten (10) days From thk date of action. This approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days,frorntlte date of final map iEgprdatjt ' or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. Should applicanC fail to remove the trees wihtet this e > day period, a..new permit shall be required, unless an extension Is requestesd fourten ( 14) days prior to t ^� expiration of ti±e permit. j( f} r R2 ar1 e. 4'^R l�qq nt r. . . srrat�.1 i#4 iVSrJfd� -r _g. acTr•..r ores... Y, �,1„�.,,•�e.....�... _. CITV OF RA ."L-tix TITLE .b' AANNUZ �. EXilEii'. °�,.E F lqw sir} PM mus- CqYOF RAI op tv a • _ 4184 w i� 4-4 ATE Al �'�MyIYL� JIF.hYI - w�4+YM11WIY , t iRXjM (�i 1 HO CK�WNIUICA, 1 t #irs1� }! TtTLD i� 0,,.. ti A RESOLUTION OF mTRE RIB APPROVING' BESIW REYIE LOCATED WEST OF ETIWAN IN ThE LOW DENSITY (2 -4 A. ORect tali lil , At WiTION Ly,4 Design Review of. Tract,_Wos. 1- M, } CW.%y x PLANKING COMISSION 'tll� 'OR lT NO..13627 and 13.052 RVE;MM NL'RTH OF BRSE LINE ROAD ELLING PER ,ARE) DISTRICT Kl _r ".c pa rip fill? In �7.. 11 PLANING Ct*ISSI0K 1RESQL��TIOH No.,, ,' TRACTS 43027 8 130$2 i,yQrf Co. � �% < 11 �.�- "`"`: _.,�:��...�.�: 4. -pesed upon the,�indrngs arre onclal 1. s' et for paragpaph 2,. abova,, J.trps & ssir3n ... ; ��' appue e �_ i ap�f atifdn st�hyact ea r and 0sr 'coti�t #0 beiorr and in ft attached- Standard `'t6ntions u2lE��_ he incurporat'd hera #n by this refs` once. s ;t ?� P4annin D 'trfs#on: ca7+ tbba3us trees p OW fot;Jr oval # r ash! , 025 -ton 3 6 Wmlyptt pt i54 B of ate :,.T* #aanda �fffv P1 �117 Q iIs- R , J 1 dSG�d 4F, irr�5 fit aq p700n 4 Cage stti," €"€ b,& t r ` tr^tn rcanS r c,iort o ehst; windrows t* p ed A m# ean A iecti l su es outline i„ raa rysk - nonce 1.411 oe #�01 •any � 'shad he,` sped�too on t "O"t ial xa dscaR araQ t #rrfgatn fpians. �� r, t3 s astr �. us,, &e nnr e` C p ng °j i �tct ;'16 joU 22A and a21, tai .; suiiti?F't��," �hai"t• = `be ._ �t9#d tru�td „ per'' �e � � �� = recd; atit� sftti n ,�►`�ustf stud �rtke�oc� #ates� A finalcstai anai�rsis is re 9:°ed. priori " tp issuance ,of . txe�'idfihg ped�Ait�. �Sr The c,us o of Circular . 4 ewiys � is accdpiable. r ' VIM 61 exceptli", sif 'fot 145 which requi-res � J a h2rhea'��dnihra!�a,�. ,f j eftnts 1�i.e _zfor, xins ;� details, etc,l swi be ffied slig tly on e c 0f the f'#ft do unit's ji "or•dsr to crate a custom, hope ` feel to the > �rra�ect. °:r> „ 0 1 Sevotions small bo mvi , a , the' Cat �" _ ��;� �►�� p��v'�d�,by i/ °u the ' City, pr € °r tin +- i ssu�i�c� of cock shAlI 6 'fit '4' y u rf L t7). Native iid .ratt*er° '�h a w a _ manufactured stave. 4 V. ` Flu } ' r kmumQP�vf'LCIi yT'T�Qyi+! fX ��t'i:- OR 'C0- ee gridp d"'�°`'�� shy` lbe r v oil i s Bnc� hui , z� F��r+�i� Fri -o � n e.Et,t P$rytageti,� Wes) 01 aatr��rucd�� the , s Et# rout ;Sg sIvt Plan y�4 J 3 .y��{ �T�IrfE1 -t J• r',,bl 1x7.14. ► Pu r seo t r t6U 4 sh ��mru� dak` brr�,f` if Ose Jots., #.it egad:8atf tjt M ;� a ceaa I�#; iC40 l$flCe W;ri�itT. dli#i1�@ \131„; \it�S;: d2#i% � a }� fix' c+ ep rav ` � Px41 e6 c ats, Et -wande A,+�,s�tw ��, x'11 d re 9s tb th€ 4 4 i o X711 ids i� '? end',Aj2Z° 1 M t`ac ai)5? Vii.: treys #naicirs(Y`'; �� t4xx%ad k t J 1 i .1d l 9 1 Su it tb .ShA be ho -to fife <curb 4trFl.A �i !vorter \\ tit existing tux �sei:�t1s. c�a the s # sT z t�f Etix dot -kiegi.e bit eta . i itiand wenub ;sd , Ly `one u Ide i r shy tents w#p, fthe �►�'`ricy of „ EtiVOW l�;,tt�t� i s `�' add to the ?Uiure' u , � ll nK S.r/ y7. - ':4aS,�ii,1'sv4Y% ii 3K b:Y;14 ugyyy)�/j//�� Cylj'.l!yr. -ny k: 1 Qr#ir' 3 �r a t�� b'� w. p =. c c: ISS�Itd_}i�-i�RESQLLYOAO CO' A6 `x3, 196 M.. " thi wit, adaQ4d unit ao6unt time4 the l"q nark ,graetyiae Of ~ � ut►� auk Pror4r_ ' I P4 'Sat i } > e to l,Pad, -!rsus O VOrmlat dri e+�ay she X> =ate. provi(NV_ far lot l4a af, 3ra�i� #�34 � �` a 4. f " , �bo8 �ttY ` S�Cr ' ry ✓� D ht g., �coft -If �o i sited �Z� #fy to oft- a hts.it s ltltitstt� c.� , PPRwia3 , #C,h TM THIS 13V DAY, OF APRIL 1988, PLANNING COMISSTdg `ft 'C% Hf3 Cd#C MA ;� f J @Y .....a.77 ...... X #EV 'a. Br&d Bitll t~9 QeR�2ty4 tsina ' t aisaiomt 4'?�- th City a Ranca` Curtrt8a, dt► nare��e �.d "fdreg�ir�R. Resalu��ppalp,att ' tr�r i�g ba is as►� i ost -the of, Rancho a as an a� a 8 2 �isPatif t. th PI regularly nducad, a ae x th day 3 8 o �e�t�r sitf , d AYES: _ C9hs5aCilt:lr ° �_' G =�aE94i CiNttuFt}tiEpS ,: 0, Cf Yy (� r' if Oil J ITI r th 41 +aF1� A a 3 11 lip! . "$ irwit lit F13 c� lid ` ' = ` I AUT Titww ae a. w. ts- .k +� w � zayiv7y*�,�. sip aYi R C ! @i lY NNNiii 1A Qk lei ITS `,• �;, ��w.." �. " Ti- ' i49t l� u co Ah iP If Alf! 0!E Y : - v Y /^ AsoY B tl f6M tl ~ �r a »a°r w —i tl — �a N(b1� Syr —,: 8 P" (�" ! .040 tl 4 • .i i b w V ..� a »tl ��` .�1� to gad �_= »a�a�'s "i li" r� -g a@ MR �.Os� e —b QSWtl,. `ON ~mow 9_ tlOO6 C_M o—' DO��!. Ciy =�t.� W"s ces L 1 O Cb C N�}�(fir N: �.a Via- yy .�a1 (r.y� �1. 0 03��{�.. 7C-••6 yl�yf � yC R `L'�jyr°�" a (w�p� � 'O O - a b NL� +sN Rn44 H' NNr � ��tls: bryry4` t . � ray O ♦.N a � py � �y x <tl as i9 a�q Fi L(1 (I�yM Ad VgG'p oY'�`^r.acte Ste. Uric ja '� rfi i. Y t s �. Uzi W It 06 offs SIP 'IF vs a It si IS 7 i,p = IZ21 Ip jjgg pr !.. 31� � as 'g •* 4 lasx I . gyp' ' 281 Y Z. YW bmt �� ' N•i 4�y ::'"�� : 9i P y ��q i 4 e�y YN s: 1122 x.. Is �_e A'eE7,e a N A u e a 1 j �� wp u .mom0 7.:Qga .p Qg p w rte: ~ 1e ~ N ^� o Q r N m.� we a� a �. � �+. Nye. N:� $ �� `�� f.•o -ST yy a.,r y Yq M�pg5 ri p 1p+2�� tl OQ. Y w N� ► Z �t4 4 7 tl _ C _. Nw .V» .i �.• * wg' b, u{ 2,�Nw q1 C y K g �p1 R� A'�o' ��Y1�4 C.xra� uy ap7 wNr ®'.`~y.A�uBw . 1Z�., O.qir h' ID rQuaft SH ffr = I 8' f IV � w S AX '111 a MM yy� Y� � 1 }'� II r� 4Gx�A lk�(y Aep�qsc4myY�, �, l`-�• '$�iiir 1 Q ®v k _ µgou�ffi� 4 AM iw L Af- 11 41 "ZI • • gyyQ1 SkV Yb y �p 4 j 9-146 1 �i,ra, R'0 ffi�,.@@�lT lj7 w �� ipCt yy�," O— R y i7 Y.♦yC� y� � ``c�L y ■y■ i1.z O.. P's 3r -:C .�y fL1 w � C ^rY O� R a °b C'Ytiyu ° N6�+�� C.C9 y'.y C W =V 6.'Ljit 1 of s$s�_�� ==�� i'IM t � Y q s,,.. ire pX v, .v� alp S CA fill T $ ptl�1� ®4, g0, AJ A� �� w F � •Z��ts P~i�Y OH Mil`tr�' G'.��I� tgi;�r,8 �9� O M 1 y MM Sao ¢ i�` rl »= Ay ; N ..a �p 4 p l . as :°Q 1T th �.� ® S Ngya 4R i$�Y a.+i �p� as Hsi 4n�, MM411,-� 4�y yO�� a1 NU.N A �r �V.O� p♦ u ..;± V � . a � �• 7 s q ..i w y L C..� .:kg lS V V/w � Q tyw ■.Y�" ii. �4qy 7, 2- 4�. �° t`J 4.: y�: yN M'M DiL fi k2a�.9f i1 _ n 'y " 0 ILE • tttl�Yt GG v. ^ g � Y Y �1 3 M g OHy� s =Vars g La „ qi{ tl 1-4 J= 'fie` _ »t Na zz Yip t �$j�$+ - 'IS K� � aIVl tft:iL� �f a I N 'f °3L g �stv Ml Q aW, V Cry r�j W: -;M yp qqe X -,s a ••M �•: �j y$c� R. ri/7��Y" �r� �Itl i4"f �qp� IDEA irqLL CO af� w•C R rj6 zY y S. G. itli�q 1rp I� tl0i` mEY'Mit`.59. N L 1 A �n tl C yq a va OI a L 413 `�itlq T$ L totm aa• Sq i6 '� '^ f � � N L.. W q�b �I Q ^s'^ aYi 7 l`9 ♦ 4L y } Lt * W i I J T• ,� Y r '6 Y�yy ` Mrs - `fg r.. .414 » i. Ma.. ... ygg tit igb. Mr Y 4Vr� IL Pit � x� •i«.L` .4 �'�Y= "' „ Z� mow° X44 p( wab _8 Ypwi ry ii4 rv.Lk 44 4M. ..Y -+sW �YF�e N ALLb N a0 �, ,tl r. 4 vi r. g!_ ` ,.,� 1,c ��r'+� at Y �.L UO �-i +mow' {G�y� i 44 VE �r � Sway 4 ... ffIS.M AY � �... �.. iqq•> � 1p Y?d .:F' W�?r 4w sti. Ci'tYOF IWCHO iGjTCt010NC,*: C_CA '�'dd STAFF `REPOR � . C o ' a DATE: Apr i7 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and, Webers of Flanni�gyc�- issircR , FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY- Nancy. Fong,''4,miate;Pianner , SUBJECT: DIRECTOR REPOiT ON FAST FOOD <:,=y to can sider design s n ar s an gut a fi s ar r VI -M-rd facility. I. ABSTRACT: This is a follow -, � wor s op'on tfie Faso Food Stuff �' of the PlMning ,Commission Commis to consider the. the purpose is;sor the etPlhnning Proposed development stanaa�ds and desigi3 guidolines for land use with drive -that faciliti ;tf the Gommission'coneurs with the- proposed languages, `then d�ff to prepare an amiendmel. to'- the DeveTooinp Code _'to ad�i those standards and ;guideli'nes. II., BACKGROUND:- The P`dWng Comeissfan has long Eaeen concerned with s, us�inesses' with drive -thru facia] /ties,- ineiOddIngr bat not limited to fast food restaurants. The Oncerns are tzmatmifty of use, visual and :aesthati:c Appearancd;� Previous projvts have nc,, adequately addressed these concerrso especially in the screening of the drive -thru lane, according :to the Dommaission. tither concerns or problems perceived with these type: of businesses include increase in mime level from increased traffte aid from ordering, increased lettering, odor and litte;,ing, ?,oss of privacy for the adjacent residential areas and unattractivd buildings.' In dtxiewing these issues, the P a'"Isg Coilaission has 'Mcogniaed t that Rancho Cucamonga is one of the fastest`lgrowipg coimunities~in the Inland FMa re, and will continue to attract more of these ty6es of drive -thru facilities. TheWore tW Coamnirsion had diWted staff to. prepare a special study on th, subject, in an attempt to,,k better understand the problem and tf .' 'dveriz=Ampact on' the City and to estajllish development crttarfa , to address the unigae characteristics of drive -thru ,facilities such as fast food restaurants. On October 8, 1987, the Planning Commi:ssia.a conducte �a spade? workshop on this subject and dtkussed �Fose suggestcd'development criteria and guidelines at m4' mitigate:., the identified concerns.. The Planning .0 4c ,5ion then 4irected-stiaff to prepare an amendment to. the developmj ft Code in adding those criteritls as o~ discussed in the special workshop. Copies of the `actobar.8,'1,987 .fast fend special study report and minutes have °been attached fur Your referenc±. PLANNING 1SSION DIRECTOR "S REFJRT RE: Wf F060 STUDY Apri3.13�,,i9S Pt 2 111', kOPOSM REGULATIONS: Based r` the comments and feedback fr(6 the omm ss "'n vgr p, staff "reca sends that the following Oevelopnlent standards -and design guidelines be added to Section 1fi.10030, Sped ;l Use Re,alations in the: Ceeanerti:tal /Office District of the Devglopment Code: Section 17.10.WW Dave -Thru FaciWlei' -. �"Phe intent) of the guidelines i's to ass I s -*_7U4 sfgne_r-In Qndarstanding and -complying witF,- the City standards for building, and site design. IIIe 0081 is to provide 'hig1 quality design, cc�pntibility of use . and to mitigate environmental and aesthgmic,cpncerns that ;re created by this type of land use. The,ljfollowing desi'gn'standards and guidelines,;rshall apply to uses with drive -thru facilitiesz a. Location: Uses with drive -that facilities shall K� 300 feet away from any .intersection and from-another drfve- thro facility on the some side of the street except within a shopping tenter or master leis rtestararants with drive - thru facilities shall hs'4 4ihiaw, of 100 feet away frcm any residential "use or, district•boundary. Analysis: This proposed standard is based on a survey of T MTR-id Orange and San BRrnardino County and research on two other Northern Cnliibrnia cities (Pataluma and Hayward) on <, their deelopitent standards for drive =thru° facilities as shown Jq';Nhibit "D" The City of Redlands requires a 340 foot, City of iityward .requires a 500 foot while the''City of Petaluma ra quires a, 700 font distance separation. Requiring a separation between drive -thru -two 4 facilities would help dissipate. traffic congestion decrease the saturation of the same type of facilities and . improve the streetscape. By requiring a distance separation from .residential districts, it would help mitigate some of the environmental- concerns,. such as=,the increased traffic fr* truck, autos, noise, and glare. b. Site Area: Uses 1 I*UeOe -thru facilities shall minimum 1. acre net -fend :area. This minimum••land area MAY be modified when ttte d►;ive -thru facility is within ,a „. Master Plan `''or a 4` integrated shopping -. center through Design Review process, D Anal cis; At' the Fast,, Food, Workshop, the Conoission ra se 'typical concern wits? the small size of land "area 1. for all drive -thru facilities, the Is$ion stated that the land area should have sufficient size to address concerns of,-landscape bur*ering pedestrian orientat4on and plaza area, vehicle sckin`gapaci�ty sfff ;ient area o Pl�1f NIRG C"ISSION DIRECTOP ,< REPORT- RE: `, - %T FOM MUDY _mom }tri.l 13, 1966 ge to desfgr' drive -thru lane separate from other parking drive aisles and pedestrian connf.w-tion, etc:. survey of all existing restaurants aitft3 drive 0*3 facilities Wicate the net 'hand acres —; ranges „f�roaR a size �f ll.� 4Prc�kto 1-3 acne as she -ih 9'zh #bit -D” used -on the surveY,'tlre prapcesi ?ainiat�a Iding floor atrea �f 2,58D ' squ0;re,t, the setback �iren�antz, tine parc #nq� and landsca rrquvreta4iity t!tG:`a staff Fecoagends that the iain��tfA1 a'� area shtwld 6e at�rt?k `� c. 7M minfli f,:jalr area for drive+ . o thrtl;, f6,;,ility shill be �_ •` 2.500 square 41st. 7be winiWin floor' area for a delvo- thry faciliv other than a -7 st mood restaurant my l 00fied thrwgh the C asign Review pr MOO %, final sfsc Drive -thru facilities, es eci. ?ly restaurant, Terxave Mll " box" shape httildiaVs. ,-8y reWIring„a Minimum floor Area, it would allow f uffici� nt Grassing �j of the building to provide - grsat &, �possi Iftiqs. of creating a Onax #o and visuallyr. leas in ''► oaf. appearance. 7be i0evage. fi r area n fast fow, driver restaurants'-In Rancifa c iga is 2,136 scare,, r� t, 60th. Carl's Jr. R-estauroyits and McDona"s have in � excess of 2,SOi1`square feet. d. The maNimao site ° coverage shad l be - of the net let / area. ' The minims on -sit# iandi -aping .which includes r� T articulated plazas, courtyards, panes shall be 1ST of,. the � net Tot area ex(^Iusive of puiflic rat -of -way. '7 prapascid standards are ca�i �t €at with � � _ s . use nxvnc in the leootii4ll Specificla Moen the drive -thru fetf Iity isritl in an > it tegrate $hopping s center, tia�,�o standards ;�tiid apply to~ tt;e entire center, , e parkin g,, and drive -thru fare f, $aIl be setback cis feat fr :he Cur!, Ace. face. Gredter setback be require n 4s \ "* Boned in the Specific an and a d'e d neces 4,4,ef j'the Design Review prods 5 Uner 'current Code, rkin and `drive -tier Ta �z could 'encJV-`�linto thi land3cape setback to within f' 1 t. #et from cu a ' for a local street ae�d * feet ft co; a� cc;rb face for a rvajc� art}\rial... ByF;requiring a 45 foal set)aack �'egiedless of street .size, Aharo I sufficient area tq , jandsctpe and buffer VIP parki,'p4' and especiall the drfve'thru lane', PLANNING COi IISSION DIRECTOR'S R(PORT RE: FAST fOW STlJ I April 13 y Ian f. Site Pianning/Building Orientation: Future drivo -thrt facility in a Master Plan o, , shopping,, renter shall be r �denti':ed early in the review' ,proctss t�, avoid retrofittietg the uses at a `�ater:date. The Oto dEsi�n shall minimize_ pedestrian /vehicle conflicts and , >avolrl locating drven,�ys and service areas which interfet^e f .�iYth the flow oU the on -site ctrCulation. Building 7ztcemettt shall be dons in . a manner t6" create naw j:edastriw r spaces and ;laze area.` Buildings shall ozient 'thu public ' entrances towards the stre:rt., Building Tayout �)ruld be, r ` oriented to screen the drivR -thru tans'. Drive-thru. YA10 l ba screened through kj1ding orientation, the ,use f c I atlon;4f low = _ k screen wall v, heavy landscaping, tres lTs work. g. Stacking Distance/Parkings The drivoAhru last; shrill be sufficient lengt+tto accowdatt ta the k4cessaty scking,- cars;: The - staukii► distance shall be „determined- through'4 parking Studyy as `-stated in Sectim 17.1. Special Regviretaents of the Parking erdihance. Each drive- th;��a lane shall be separate from 'the cittulation route nrtessary for egress 4A egress from the ps*erty or �acME to any AarkrAg spaces within the site area., h. Parking: The parking 'requireme4s; drive -'hrii fact f-ttes shall be a wording to Stcti,.h;- 7.12 of .the Parkiag Or ifnance..- 'the ' gross floor arm ° or oqtdoor seating shall k s6ject_to the saw parking requ9re nt. F. Pedestrian Ori4� ¢ion. The.,, >'site plan shO71`'create Opportunitins forti' courtyards and Plazas'' -.and other landscape opyn space to promote safe' and convenient Reiestrian movement with contiguous 'landscape!�� pathway betties bufldin4s. T;:e design should” discourage a_need for `pedestrians to. `'eve to ..cross drive -;.,a wherever possible. , �. Architecture: St, k'ardiae -4 "Coepor.,rte_ - .architectural, si4vle associated fth a chain is rohibited. Drive- tfar«. }` facilities withif� ;,n idtegMted shopping center, or faster _ Alan oncost "have .,ititecUra. *, style consistent wit" the s Lhenre esiabl`rshed 'in the,. i:enter. Archttt~cture "'nwyt "provide+ compstibility -, to " ; � surrounding uses Iif, f,.oirni, materials, Cglors; ` scale, and etc, -,Building plans `sWl } nape : variation in -depth ano anjle' t crtdi variety ar,d i drE»t in its basil; =frtn and 3i]t�'ouette of ilia building "tiCUl &tiar-`of building ?rface' shalj be encouraged the► tBh tlt ts� i bf openings and recesrci,;�hich create tc;tsrr� ` ara��s'rtaduv,,:kpatterns Building a3r�trar,Ces shall bs well articulated and nrdJeCt a ford entrkPce < thc.agh r,variatian f architectural, ' plane, p}ttent� surface #reatment "[aritiscab #� to plaza.. o 6,h "q 4 n 0701-02 4-13-88 PC Agenda & of � k c YS$talc OYREr"rOR's REPORT r puaINING C RE: FAT FOCA S"')V ; r e aril a�, i4d$ -� Page a�i Yity within' ar. integratee s�� *rv' Al ` signs shall Canfor� with the Provisions ons of k, Sig priYa -Es i` with si t�.wirdiraanco� a taster plan Mst cQ�IY shoz%�ng centOr or �.eni+er. Unii:e Sigfi Qr3gra�e as establ ;eh in the ` e' standards for restaurants in a : fanner l . Epeci r� per ms .The use shall be oPer Uie of a�cining Ith tbru +es< the<,norpianner or the n,hich 46o t notfil�� h op fl on of the violated. thy" Q _ properties. paragraph arc .hn� 9 t provisions bf i nds for roue onditi n sl the conditions to coo,tro,� viotation3 shall be dg�addit NO.' AM' not pee�,dt herrings darda include. v�hi`'ch= _cohere vidUtion.` ,Perfofoanow stacopsiderationsg 1 1i�it. to, the iollowin9 rated as Coh;�'�tiona of late. be irso ed, b the Plann'ing appraP�', shal�le ermits as ,`defierxsi_; Y apprOVa in r ��i � hcil Coisx� *dr Brie shag not surer at the p ev11Y foun.� 5f bsck"ndb'nol fi y eic r,. fn ibe 1�res. ; and thf� oi„�ta'tar . df a't no Z: ite Prts� \des shaE1 ha kept clean. os�tecY`` r`, reasonable the u�eis deP shall r trash Qr -, Ater. ;orlpies,' 9 eoarate ^° =ash .`Ot nerpies�: For :drive -thru re on aceni px icagly generate ' h or other ti<las �itich �,a trash .COntainrs, .a" l tees . fitter, aiai,ner shall h' re the and "' to pi up trash o�� Ditto, the Gl daily . p C a d with A shall 'be 0 %, the site . � PO4 the site n o feet 4g th° rime ar off' -the property. 300 _All grafi' i ti sh�1€' be rV4OVC1d withi 3 ►9 72 boars. 4. 90 unjesirable ours shall be generated, an the stayer / The on-site mans ier of the us . assure a take Toe ordef ly steps are dee�c n°ceaatrans, and visitors an the cond"ct of employe es, p ,premises. ice 6. ; > copy of these pet f�?rBi i one Hof dapproval d shall i:nnditis_�al Use �lTfii GO bJSirnvSS.�iC @115e5 be posted along side�'tbe necessary gees. 4 and _fjs4ble at ail `t"eS tr. gyp= y Commis ion 5:. that 44' Tanning S� Staff reCO R$� n �� standards and Yv� REC(iATiO �osider +:her prdosfd deeln,.�te► the iarr►ing C +fission C Curb {1:ode}s heir direct �! _' S lidillnes. if ° staff to Prepare an aMendment to the Oevelo* z77 r, L7iQiltllarG"ISSION MINUTES .O--tober 8, 1987 4 'peti41 VOrkshop -s Fast Fjpd Study` 7TTES: Planning Ci5missjons Larry MKIel„ Susanne Ch #ties, Lavid Slakeslsy, Pet er Tdl'stoy Planning Staff: Brad Buller, Otto Kroutil, ?an 001 e0an, Nancy�:#�ong, Scott 4irphy, Greg Gahm ' Chris tlestraan, Tco 6rahn, Debra Meier,_ Bev *.rly Misselt, Cindy dorri s . _ Nancy Fongg, Associate planner, pre�entod staff repo.' including '� slide presentation. The folltr7aing is a spa Planning Cosanission: ry . of ik. cussion from the The Planning Cosssasiesion felt that it would be inapPrO Mate':sa prohibit drive -thru restaurants as they: & serve a large :si*ht, of pops,latio�s< _ To ensure thy* this, land uses would riot advsar$ely isopact e'chars;ts3r of the City, the Cquission felt that strong design guidelines are needed in the are4� of site planning, ardhitecctdre and ls� ' ;cap no. F A. Ldcational patt4,nn t ,. The Crnalsston was concerned with tNtp over conhentration drive of - thru facilities especially drive -thl, r restaurants at intersections or along a major artetialsg .creating :a feel#n, vV "fast' 'food estasarant row ". The Gsre ission would like staff to look into ways of distributing these• ty ds of land uses, such as, distribution .by service area. disianceparattcan, est;`�?ish the asaxi number of restaurants 'dt cerr$ain. corners, of!` V %Ubiish. criterii to tius_ter drive•- thru facilities at a food court. the COMisSion stated that a - r ma,;or element in any proposed criteria fqr fotatianai pit #e±rn is ' &o make- sure that the'drfive -thru fas.il'ity is a certain di.stel away from intersections. , ,Me. Planningi COW sSion also :geed xeith staff's,' suggestion that proposed integrated shszppinrg center, the develq�3r should designate U-trtain future pads f .huilding for drive -thru f4 11itiet to avotd retrofitting which could adver3sly- af0ect thd� ov ra11 drculatiarrl /pedestrian access. ` 8. Site Planning: The Co fission felt that the parcel stle or site area for this type of land use is typically inadequate. This pares;) ,siae constraint eesults in an area baling tote tig), t to allow for innovative ways in- designing the Site plan, 6u lding orientation and landscaping to - address L il"d mitigate their conors`s. ?ire Cossnissioh felt that -. criteria should be established in thi follow in911�' ; s; 's. � f r, L' For free - standing drift -thru 'faciiit)" a m niax . paNdi size should be established. 4,thin At: 1nt6rated shopping center the parcel size could be alittle bit wal'ler; hotaevet*, the CMissi90 stressed that the deveioOer should designate certain building pads for drive�thru facilities to avoid any retrofittf6g one to *i center. 2. provide minim percentage of landscaping to too net lot area. 3. Provide isiflir .` floor area. • t}} 4. Provide outdoor eating ,araag an4 plaza areas. S. Drive -thru lanes could occupy on (uoth St1ts of the bvildi'ng to' avoid Tong liaas of car statkinsg. ' 6. Malin building aniry~tray should not btu on the., $etae side as the ; drive -thru Suite. 7. Outdoor seating areas should bt counted as part of the V'd`os3 floor area For .calculating t,t ounber of parking �pac� ' qu S. greater setback fK»_ streets, grsatei, .Jrade differential betmaeen drive -thru lane :a:ld strea,t.._."d appropriate wending and; 'landscaping, extensive C. :%Agking Distance: The Commission agreed with staff that criteria should be established to reiterate the nlannitsg.Co ission past policies in deailtig with drive -thru lanes. Drive -thru, lanes should be screened through, building orientation, the use of cwbination low screen scrn walla: heavy landscaping, trelltis Work, atC. The Co ission also ag- to that thy= cosrrent Parking Ordinance Is sufficie4% it that 04f n3 spaceo witniH the drive -thru Cana may be countt!1 to satisf If $ustiftea by a study. The reasons boing that eith typegof� land use that required drive -thru faerlities is slightly different. for examples the stacking distance required for a drive -thr4 bank is different from the stacking distance required for a McDonald Pestaurant. ` 9 Farkin• The Commission agreed with staff that t,v.. existing parking ratio is adequate. E. Pedestrian Criedtati k < The Commission felt't�at hastor ;tally, drive -thru 'facilities °have �►at provided o ortunities for court } yards and Plata$,- and other landscape open 'space to VOmote safe and convenient` padeStrf"a'i r mavement' The COW,11S Oft agreed that such design criteria is needed In the #letdlapa:.t cod S`�.AFF REPORT FDATE: October 8, 1987 u 19" Chairman and Mem5ers of the 'Planning Cormnission FROM. Brad 801AW, City Planner BY: Special Project Feast:;.: Nancy Fong ,.Associate Plannar ,Oebra !Meter, Associate Planner; Chris leesiaaan, = Assistant Planner: Cindy Morris, Assistant Planner, Tpg Grahn, Assistant Planner- SUBJECT: EAST FOOD S'0 -0i' C% w T. ABSTRACT: The ; orpose of this workshop is to facilitate, scuss on between Manning comission and staff in regards -to' drive -thru facilities such as fast; food restaurants. I The scope of this special studyIncludes: o identifying the issuas and Problem to and created by ,;4tated drive- thrR�_ aeilities such as fast food restaurants; o examining the current City's applicable codes to see if they ate adequate or appropriate in�,mitigattng the identified problems; �1 o determining development standards afid design guidelines to mitigate these'identiffed problems; and o recommending to the Planning Commission for establishing and /or adding development and desatgn .standards criteria. II. BACKGROUND: The Planning commission has long b4len concerned with fast drive -thru restaurants. The concerntl, are compatibility j of use, and yinal and aesthetic appearance. � Previous projects have not adequately addressed these concernsil especially in the screening of the give -thru -lane, according to the Commission. Other concerns or problems perceived with this: type of businm' are the ixrease in noise lever front increased traffic and from ordering, increased loitering, odor and litteringg, 'lass of privacy for the adjacent residential areas and unattractive buildings. As one of the, fastest growing communities in the Ifiland - Esgpirea Rancho 'Cucamonga will Continue to attract morp..,,, of these types of drive -thru facilities. Therefore, the punning Commission directed staff to prepare, a special study on this subject, in 'an attempt to better understand the problem and the adverse impacts on the City and to establish development Criteria to address the I unique characteristics+ of fast food /drive`thru facilities. i PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT - _F FOOD STUDY_ __ t7ctober g,_ �58� AL Page R III. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: In understanding this type of business, we nee o exam na a design considerations unique to it and their potential adverse impact on the City as follows., - A. Locational Pattern Orivi,ig along any.major arterial, one can eas y sFo a as food restaurant with drive•thru facilities f as they are typically at the minimum setback, have their own monument sign, and frequently have *temporary," banners. 'this type of business hais show -r a strong tendency to cluster together either .around major Intersections or along major arterials. Wbit,'A" shows the location of all eXi:stinagi' xfast food drive -thru restaurants in the City and Exhibit "8 ,s a sUft&ry of their developmnt statistics. As they tend to serve the traveling ouj)IJ6, they are, sitMatad in areas where local and regional traff ft are At a a�xf regardless of similar businesses already ir; the vicinity. It especiCly amplifies the Southern, Claliforni'a lifestyle that is "auto - oriented ," on the ga to play tennis Or to the beach". This E locational pattern m&y, conflict with the, Ganer�,1 plan goals of the .City in it -e, "vision" to enhance the, quality, and on character of the c pity environment by discouragin�(and uses of ,a strip corcial nature that increase trips and turning movements that disrupt treffic,flow. D. Site an Orientation Since the iaajarity of the business rr�a Vie b—sYNOTTOWTs are based on customers' impulse, They need as much visibility front ,the street, frontage as possible.. The usually "box," buildings are oriented either along the street frontage or perpendicular to the, street frontage; with . the drive -thru land being the, east visible etnt of the building. Ono "of thP,istpacts created by drive -thru lanes is thi objectional vi it of a lt►Eag line of, cars stacked in it. `Another impact is the often' inadequate ar stacking distance within the drive -thru lane where the %b /verflow of cars could block the driveway of adjacent °parking, ;spaces, or worse, the public street. If poorly designed, the , concentration of these types of business establishments along any one major arterial can degrade!�,ths aesthetic appearance Of streetscape and co nity character. C. Parkinq. Due to the high volume of traffic, the number of prr`Krn,4,spaces required for fast food is 4i fier than regular { restaurants. 'Therefore, a sea of parkins, is generally_ a dominate element of fast food drive -thiv restaurants.' { Typical traffic related problems include sffle entrance and exit area congestfon, safety hatai,ds and time iielays for both u users and non- users, automobile stacking on ,adjacent street Intersections, vehicular.encirOachment, into pedestrian areas and the additional ped`,trian,traffic generated by this typi, f of establshment`'could 4ncrease the likelihuad of accidents. ,! MANNIN6 COMISSION' STAFF REPORT October 8, 1987 Page 3 f D, Architecture's Probably fast foods least redeeming teat i,,s pro o yp ca ,design; The repetition the wale building design or style of architecture - the corporate ` identi °ty. McDanald s for example, W look the seas in aril, Texas y. it does in Paris, - France. This saneness ln-- aearance tends= to break doiln individual and neighborhood 1Eh8recter and decreases: thoj, quality of the community, environment. Tina second _predominate design' characteristic to fmst fond d grea ly T in tteii at Past and corpotattons standard formula. fto are becoming mare sects IY. EXISTINO s Awfi [Rn-t dno n;err A. - Current Code Re shaped b 11ding. that is dictated by s and sWol site. Nearly all such rectangular, shaped with flat oir irs. vile possibilities of providing a no appearance with this buhane feria have not bee& very successful in than have been reluctant to vary frogs a Mr. soars national fast food Chains 1ve to the local cpetla$ , DW ORIVE-THRU REM�AiLS s The 4evel o 4, 'CAAt . > w wWRICs fast to r, ve- ru res aurnnts within the GeentOif Commercial District Ask under lets 11eve1opment Review process and conditionally permiis Within the Office Professional and Neighbo'ihood Commercial sistricts under the Conditional Use Permit Process. There are, also spee;ial raquiO memo in the _ Parking Ordinance related to all drive -thru facilities which includes not only` fast food. restaurants, bit, bariks� dairies, � etx. Yhe special criteria include rggdrdiaejti:s for a separate drive- t-a-,u iiiie rkwc 'dr0;ye aisle ��acont to Farling spaders. - Another critoria is ,a trdfflc suq dy twit ad�re� es the issues of time required' to sdryt a 'typftal, cusukir, , arrival rate of custowters, peft demand, etc (see; kxhibit-14cm) to be subieittasd for City Planner review in „order to, det�imine the stacking capacity, However, th4re are no special criteria in' the site plan and architectural guidelines to mssist applicants in designing drive -thru facilities to add�,oj,�,the concerns of the Planning COMMission. A review Of” the b�� recent projects within the City indicated that the;.Planning t+OvMssion has consistently stated that the site design. thou Id provide for visual connection and be consistent with the approve �J luster Pian if it. is within ' a center. The f rchitecture must be consistent; `I will; the theme architecture within the center or comspatible 1� to 3urtn�kanding land uses. ,F PLAWN6 COM11.41ON STAFF REPORT FAST fOOD STUDY B. AComparf son to 'Other Cities. As part of this sturdy, thirteen ?:' es were surveyed in order. to 'evaluate their, requirements, or drive -thru restaurants in relation to those- for -Ramho, Cucamonga as shown in Exhibit "Q". Of those surveyed, it was found that MO cities du not have specific design criteria other than minor locationai determinants In relation to residential- areas, (Chino, Fontana" and Upland), or basic parking andM, virculation requirements.. These include, generally, the sonditionse ` TK t the ;drive -thiv must be.indapendent frca'fa main Ingress or egress or from any parking areas, "(Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Aedlands Santa $ha aqd. San Bernardinu), That the drive -that* lane should be a specific length to allow for a safe stacking distance, „ The method for determining this stacking distance varied, with two ill cities stipulating the length threugh ordinance and six (6) cities requiring some ford, of traffic study. Yor - the rest;; the stacking distance is eased upon gen`tral po1'icy or ,is governed by thk particular``situatin Newport ` Beach sr:d Redlands were °tile only, commnities with additional guidelines for drive -ttru restaurants.. Redlands requires a 300 foot distance t tween establishments, and restricts drive -thru aFpess from vain arterials. - `Nwport Beach has designed a'Restaurant Ordinance (Exhibit "er') with specific guidelines which address areas ,such as setbacks, percentage of Iandtc&n andl'screening. On the whole, for most of the cities ey surved, doc0gn guidelines for,, drive -thru restaurants are based upon the underlying zone requirements and a case,by -case site analysis. This is similar to Rancho Cucamonga where specific design guideli,rres relate primarily to parking and circul rtiqpi for the drive -thru aisle while site design is based on _ihi base zone requirements and' policy, and tne' particUlar, situation. Parking ratios varied great.1y froep City to City; City- sow so were based on square footage and -some relate to the< number of seats. A survey of exi.1ting drive -thru faci4itie's in Rancho CWcamonga tndi'cates that there has been � 4ry little in the way of,specific policy guidelines for drive -thru restaurants (see Exhibit "B ").. 1A6st of the direction has been toward th0 elimination of corporate architecture and incorporating the ' % facility .into'tne-entir-e ,center. - Additional attention has, been given ,46 the screening of the drive -thru from,,public view, particular)� if the aisle is facing the s , {ie. Del Taco on HaveN. treet , _ , PLANING COWISSION, STAFF REPORT MST FOOD STUDY October 8, 1981 V. ,, pit. ":R ASPECTS RELATED it SpvcsAL STUDY apse` _wits )driv` -thru ffaeil • other than fast food: > Do all pYO emry a s� app y o.Yo er r va_thrus, such as banks, mini_"rk;4S,r auto service, dairies, 'photo Masks, etc? - ! TO a certain extent most of';Ohe .issues /�sabieets identified ' in tine previous sn orts apples: �sr these- yiypet'off;. uses,, such as banks, dairies, and ain\i- q�arkrtw pith drivewthru facilities. For eKaecples baanksi,or Phdtd kiosks would +olio desire ft locate in the most visible area-Within the shn ping center 0 on the street. ` Other concerns include bull ding . Va and drive -thru Tsne orirantatlon,, maneuvering areas ,. i overall circulaation. 70 a lasser degree, another concern: is corporate id =nttty 'Of architfture and signs. iimveri one may not�'have the sa>Aa perceived problem with a drive - tired bank the Frith .ifni- marketsi.alhn�iRiasks, as; the \` degree of the dric� ru i�eing used bee,leis frequent'and the corporate architectunr' air trot be as noticeable.' - B. Is this'probleg with faft` f nti rani a to Naven AvenueT As �vu aFL_.,a1ware, , ae par "" o avert ."" p senb'Z-7-0- su 1 of Foothill, It governed by th@ Heaven Avek0,;i' Overlay District which conditionally aT?nw's fast» food .r:extaurants only in "ting: conjunction with an axis building. 1 *ree- standing drive- restaurants are prohibited. Vith regards.,to'the portion of Haven Avenue above Foothill' Boulevard, there, as an existing Del Taco retauran, an El P011.0 Loto in the near future, and a' proposed Burger mini ;will be '�?nsidered within the Terra Vista Village shopping center hated at "the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Bate Line .;load.;; However, there are additional poteftial site", for drive thru fast food restaurants within this) portisr,0f Haven Avenue (Exhibit. "C "). For exasaplo, thar ,Tj rro Vista Town Center at { the northeast corner of Foothill _ and Haven, the vacant land At the Southeast,r,r+er of Haver Avenue and Highlands the Havers Vfllage- ShOppfnj Center -at the northeast corner Of wigl�land` and .Haven, and this, vacant land -on the west.' du ,i t+f iiavanr north of ..fie rat 1 read traejts d some --Of 'the sites may req! re General Plan Mendtont to accommodate this type of use). There are other major arterials and speaial;bo��levards wtithi~ c the City limit,,. such as Foothill Boulevard, Archibald Avenue, Milliken. Avenue, Base itrae Road, , VECtoa; 1, Parkwt�vr n etc. Along Foothill, Boulevard, t�'e recently adopted Foothill � SpeC'iflc Plan riaait the f .would ,. Sit.$ ,._W ="t, a�rantis cools be allowed. However, the °Foctiziil Spebific c✓ Plan does not affect the portion of .Foothill Soulevard east v r PLANNING CfJMMISSIOW,5 AFe REE 3tti FAST FOOD STUDY October 8, 3887 of Haven and west of the 1 =15 Frey. , Therefore, Haven Avenue is rrdt the only special Boulevard or Major arterial that has this related fast food restaurant problem. In sumury, soave of the Problems "Identified with fast food restaurants also apply to other uses, such as banks, dairies, Y. etc. There are many sites within the City that have the potential eto develop into a fast food restaurant or other . drivt4hru facilities. Thergfore, staff recaimwmts that,, the City should �'elop special criteria that could apply to all drive -thru 46111ties regardless of location and uses. VI. PROPOSED RESMATIONS: In the previous sections, wa, have exaiiined e un que oesign characteristics "of fast Jood drive thru restaurants and the adequacy of the current DeV010 ent�Zode in addressing them. This section of the �re*rt, lists ,ft identified Problems followed by a suggested des: n criteria and brief analysis. Ai blank space has been provide immediately below each identified ffrobleft for, ?.he Planning CaNSIssi0n to cosment /aritt on, AM A. LoaAmal Pattern =• prive -thru facilities, especially past a0 --r- n< o ocs"te and cluster along asfjor arterial and ct Ujor intersections or within the'Mo t visible free-standing, pad i.n a tie shopping ,center, .Ior convenience of `,th traveling public, thpscreating an impact to the streetscape. Su ested Design Criteria: Criteria` could be 'es a s red" x'10 require , � �"inil mum separatiton distance between drive -thru facilities 'along' any, ��r .arterial "and 'from reside rtfal district, As for the-, proposed development of dropping ,,centies, Triter of should be established to .encourage the; designation of certain free-standing building pads for drive -thru facilities. Taese building pads for future driva-thru facilities should be Oriented away from the major intersection and preferably within the interior, of the site.' Analysis: This required distance separation betmree; two r facilities ve- ru would. ,,help dissipate, traffic congestion, decrease the saturation Of the same type of facilities an,i improve the str•eetseaps. It also would -help maintain the social and econoMic stability and a" genga al welfare of the neighborhoods. By requiring a � distance separation from residential distr1eats, it would help; mitigate some of the envirbrampntal concerns, suet , as the greasy Odor, increase 'traffic fMA- .track,, autos and noise, light,from giaring: and privacy. -_, Tf:4,earlu ' -- s y - -- ,« - - -_--. a.alrgvads S ff :tr�i�i'e"' thro, facilities within, an in'te8rited shopping center - { Pl.RB1HrIWA 0WISSIOm STAFF REPORT FAST FCW STUDY Oct6 r 8, I981 Q I' could ovoid retrofitting one in that toul'd 46- arsely affect otj;ralj circulation, pedestrian acwess,. etc„ . Planning Commission Coments, z� r 8. Site Planning: fie, building fbi;m is usually a Iohx °boxy . 'Me shape Walle driva4hru lame oriented,,in the most kctsiblit; way, to street : frontage. Thfs site plan orientatir�► -it int�m�i: to serYe' the purpose of advertisiq their busIit4- 1 since tb& $ority of them are froaa impulse. 149945 t e Design Criteria: Criteria could be es a ;�sre ere u MTayout should be or9ented tn: scree,' the drive -thru Tana!„ where the public entrance of the building should be oriitnted: towards the street, thus inrrovfng the streetscilpe. Should then,drive -thru - lane I d`a:signed paral l! 'I, to or. perpendicular to t ? treets, criteria should -be established to riqut,re the combination of smtet�� setbacks frond streots, greater grade different = between drive -thru lane and street j apprcpriate mow, aging and ea'Met live landscaping. ' I nalysl s: -' As 1 mentioned- ; previously, fast food., 11 restaurants have certain uniip a characteristics that i create some design limitations. 'Mis is especially so with the orientation Of the drive -thru ;sane. in reviewIng _ the site planning of past projects and a � k roposed one, it shows that there are Only so many ways;- orient the drive -thru .lane. Typically, the' drire- thru lane may be parallel to the street frontage,ias show►R in EIpibit "FIN, whfch creates an adverse i iact ; of exposing the objectionable 'view of the drive -thru lane and the cars stacked in it. - This could be mJtIgated with a combination'of ways such ,as :creating a greater grade differential between tbq,,Mve�thru Tane 4ttreet, and the mounding and Iandscapi ng=e�png l ands tape setback;= areas and /or greater setback, \er street. a Another drive -thru lane orientations k-�s tra be ., Perpendicular to the street frontage as showy ink "FE ". ,Ihibit This site plan design ;appears tc- 1i1fi .ihe maintenance and immaturity of the plant material. } cl 1 PAST' FOOD STUDY (r exposure of % drive-thru lane as, alArs normlly exiting rrx�r it while fire stacking is ;behind the building. 7he %ird way is to arient the drive -thru larA 6ahind. the Y7 building AS Shown, n in Exhibit *F34. This depi�j creates. a "strVer� he* drive -thru that, appears difficult fori � � cats to maneuver in it. , Pla�r�Go#rrrdssion Ccoats.' / / ZI o ' C. Stacking Distance: d The,viW. of a long line of cars'staoked Within Ine r ve -thru lane is obJectional. Aliro, the- st:tckir distarO witbin the drixi; -thru lane may not 'be adequate %hereby it could create Q"e_fioK of cars that " "block the parked cars froK the drive aisle. y n Suggested Desi n trite r da_ -- Criteria' could' be estojli s sifwvT'to ke�qu�rs, 1 , screened through the bafiding orientation, the :dge of combination of loin screen wai +, heavy landscapiftg, trellis .work, etc. Tare current Parking tjrdinaance" requires that any drivewthru 'facilfty "would "Vi to submit a traffic study to determine the ade�my of the stacking. distance as approves -by, the Citp Planner. Staff believes that this criteria is sufficient in ensur4ng that the stacking d #tance will b4� met Used on factual study. = =. Anal sis- t The planning tommission in, view reing past i pro E`C s h have wor*ed effectively, especially in the screening of ' t the drive -thra lane. An exepaple Of; brit? Is Bel Taco a a altjng Haven AVvflue,,, north of Foothill boulevard. Ibis is due to ia,proper of planning of terials, i!aproper� c PLANNING CMISSOM STAFF AEMT FAST FOOD STUDY u¢ Page 9 tFt 1 Piannin Csiatit Garrssnts D. Parking PATOng 1*01rements for" rive•.tkr, faeili ie are',; Rare resvictive than regutar.r4t,011 uses, Suggosted Design Criteria Staff lie irie mront 7ig rd�o Park O per 73 $ iare feet, of rocs, floor area is sufficient. ,t PI'ann!m gEmission Ct nests E. Pedestrian Orientation: - Drive -thru facilities, simb, ai fast � TGOO res aurae .. nks or taini arket .4-, not! h;Deurage Pedestrian spates that compliment the uses 'by creati'g p%atxas and wider sidewalks. Su` steel Design Criteria, Criteria ceuld' be,, J es s o encourage s 1te" Planning that?, creatas opportunities for courtyards,; ;a ,plates and; atther landscape open space to promote' $afs and o;OnVei6e77 pedestrian movement with .continuousladscag4) pathways,; between buildings,_,_ Planning t''o tsion Com tentsc f, rPt� s��ypCri�/�` G tr 'Slag, $?vf- October 3, 1387 Pap 110 v C i t F. arehitedturl: drive ? faGf7 ti#e , tt t f! fist 'food* en ra acre; ,. r4otti ve loss ands "building v- St -le of arthitecture. the "b0im s�aa , .buildreg, type .'1 €afits the €w3sibi i ctl for Art vtding a s�yru aau aP,_visuatlat ZTeasi ty- '� aPPeararac� ��' 33ii41di>ti� fiE�rar. " e Iasi esion Itsria►; : =ithria evil d-, �; CI• , ! ` 44tasM TM-1 C9 Tj7G ambitecturAT, �!.' �1�� Ark sR9K ak. �LJ2 c° ( Stdara basi Spch Pi°CrlaS :cortstrsruc"'�itin �� x _ County, st4t* or ` natfor�ally: �rCh$tectkt'e Pr6vide C atibili to y 5urraunding u$ed -Jn Z 5,,, r ihiii7etc.tt'n ds{a►i�a�td sng3e io create aarfiat .;tnt in V* Wasic fors 64 silhouette' " of the butl4i � _ -1 iouia�i a� ��e building, surface should W encoraged tfrraau�it use of � f p 71 ngx and r'ecesSes. WWh dftete- terra and shadif " Patterns, Suil'dirg enta<sWeoutd sdeil articulated and project a f�s3r� dntrar lresra a u riat #rasa z�f, , r hitec ,; paveftr,t ur;aj ci e# trdatAn t and 1 F dft t ntLt fted�1 faCitft Vfthin an ih4ipf no iinier Must Tra Aikhi tecturaalttyle //"OnsjsYeJot k zaS," i witIV- t e hoe estab \�W center. a lY. Staff-404 nd #fat" ��lta4 i�antf�rtosCor[ rev e"' if gecial itu(� ; 6T s#f cusS on eA h of i!i►+ id�rrtfffed a ProbTats iioft6a the car' - suggesti tesisn" criteria. Dfrection."is <also nsea? krik "be. planntmijj C4#�11�sOoft 'to, the c +prehentirt @91ESS o N azif probcp .tho $do�UaiCy "a� suggPt ed de i rr sr ,, -,.fkrth2r stu �,fs Still needed. r RespeLtffully Subisftt Brad Bu ?ler n Attachments: ?,isting Locatlan of Fast VOM Drfve�m � Exhibit Sus mry Of Oelield nt Statist' €cs otr \_ �XiS'tifi�= �,3S�r�0`b� �rfve- 7hraa:� @S$atl�*dtr.�� Ekhf6f-= ell q Current �atrel`�y nt`Go4fe fb� r�tva �•�ru basil tti� ��jjj�� rr trtr Ci s Devalo rrt p ,y - X U 1t Ail sbri Q7' ty' 'fie d`i a.tfons t witsIea' fi �EXb� " �' s . fxt ,tE,l FsaSSf�Z3 ut he as ,P`o(Iti SitOj Ajot ° tausn ;z EXhO t "Fu Exa 1 e I0fJ)r0e -TbrM =i.ane u � ;r EXhif�it,��" � Mew�t E�xa� Res'�ErAsst Ors�f�asrc� ��"� VICINITY 1Y MAP is f Ll t ieo t $ N swsr: a �R a swag wrnaai9E� acas� a � it B%I SWAY ! , Wl r, a ` A !, t• W �, i e n�.a�1,•.�.p. lane VICT OIiA � oil Am 7� CD V( � cw e" t� a Qt • a ; 6 '.i•do.am��xeos e v W18i.�T�1' a a il. tBbq•sss _ - R " s s :; `rw 4801 t"ts it 6414 V C 114AtlWN Efi,ltlW Y EXHIBITis, S (Q LOCATION OF FASTFOOD RESTAURANT$ RANCHO WtrAMON `, 04 RANCHO MUMMY �t M) XIG ,; d:� la 1 Sjt c 16 y m Sg ' at H tm J t i '. c a iy iK t�lhr �' �O A iC V ON i1! � 1r, O ice► i�J! i� p t3frur. 6 17 0y ,5i 1* C .O t7f a� v- na a u w wr=a 4. 1 r. 1 fit•- . 3� ��. 7 _ r0 C: 4a i2 4.4 FE �e '.,OQ ¢¢s� ap, N 0 �.. Cia = 41 _ 4(Aj MO.' ik %. b Vo Y° Ct -. 6 eat l CA � C � L � .. 40 4. � YC � QJ 4+" C� O 9 L , E W a"fA G�7 C! Z�9! y � y..4 c Ci 1 wt +Ott Of Z* C . tt -) c = " l: to O y Glp CQ w C iA. C., p 0. - Cn L 'M q CL fa to 40 e i�- 4' � r.r cp 41 b. d V! ".►0...y t� \ �� Y° Nlr N G N D° 5 b4r' " O p�� . N Cr 43 p d0 1f5. EF Ab rOfhrr r v `4t" ',� 7 Mr.,, t� .�4 �.,,. ��+ � 'r. Vim• 9,00 Cq P n r.7 oM cm f 2t r e Mt ts Of s � N i N C3, �� .. �b ®r c Lo `. Nt ° ..-1 5 m a 1 a c3 u ._ 3 Cyi� G:Sty;. I. q°, J► fp1'r ,C9 ia+ O1 - V yam„ - ; p AA 0 L a:..ls'`i ^� it19 CSl9"7.Ci p .• ":i� _' CY CS •r- Q L •r» � y asp . 1. N N t'd A _ k 1„ gy .fit tier. KI .e u iJ - +t tl _ < v, J 5ectioh IMa"a30 �y (b) The,3`evleessh&U not tWruct or Vowd entries, exits, or aisles. ^ 4 (e) Adult supervision is required a,:d tha devices rr.ustIL ,placed i'- , area which is visible to the supovisor at an times. - 3. Ar ades. C`ha consideration of a reg0ost for an arcade, as defined °in Chiipter "ITWs, the following criteria , will be considered and application mater4l requested. - c (a} The Commission s,na11 consider, but -not be limited to, thejneed rbir adult supervision, hours of operation, proximityy, to achaole AM ether ,community uses, compatiisility with the Burro a W— heighborhoad and busir�a�ssses, noise attenuatlo% bicycle faciliti , and interlor� waiting 1 area,. r (b} The applicant shall submit with his application, threv4sts of typed gummed labels, listing this nafte and address of at businesses, within :a `^ shopping center afid all lat fawners within a 300 toot tedius of the shopping center or #reader (c) Eaeta application shall contain s description o � -ypes otmachines, aft plan, and urs of operation. Temporary Office Modules. (a) A ,master plan .for development of permanent Wildi'64M - -ball be ` ( submitta4in conjunction with such reque, IAN` �. t7N� (b) The design of the office modules shell ;came a look of permanence, as I +' , * �'•� much as pragicable. T�,s shall ineluda such things as screening temporary fd 3sti s , screening utility equipmer►t,, and using = c overhangs, waL':i+rays, Znd stepped roofs to mitigate fha iempormry° , Q- pearance. (2) The: Approval of temporary office- modules shall require- neeessary i street improvements, grading, drainage facilities and'landseaping. , ,IS� i6l — % Centers. To ensure that the goals and pq!icies of the General Plan are implement a Conditional Use Permit shall be r uired far shopping X 1 ,�OAI centers. In such a review, the fdUawiog criteria shall be considered: rL�l 11!�- tme( (a) The trans;,ifon from morg;sensitivtland uses tnc buffering methods to mitigate;