No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/04/27 - Agenda Packet0701-02 ��..., 4-27-88 PC Agenda 11 of 5 A ti .t Pabliks r1 ., The foitowthg itoms -- -are 110110 hearjngs in which "r�gr,���;r ed clivv'zt°, ctatrs may voice their opinion gf the related project. ' Piaase it be i teognized b�+ the Ca afrrrfr?n,esnd a�ddresa the ,CorMrtaissiottt� 3raur MOW arxi c+dc'�r��., A It such opirdons shait be limited tes per fndtvk air orst�1c0oviect. ( C.. CQNDi'1 dNAL VSE i T 89-12 WEII�PE3i.T; � 9PE,TIEE - svlpne� at"xntega eoemunite e at o center consisting, of ' *} r M retail: building 9,000 sque►ca feet, mall &.%. * tota% 1 739 square t etr nine satellite retail building* totaling 43;550 feet, %vs�f satellite office ±t iTdtngs totality 27,325' *are feet, four restaurant pads, and a 30,000 a tare . faok, thenttsr, Conceptual approval for a 4 ; desip center coWsthV, sf ten buUdhW totaling "05,630 square feet. Alt an -71 °scams of ltrs4 in the Community toi�mercial Dhdriot of U a Y °orm th i'latt dd +Community, Jpeeate� ,it the 1 notaheas�t;corner of`lJ.�n Avenue I and Foothill Bo�rlava{ff A3'Al: 1077-4:31.05, 06 and 13. �Contintjedlfro In A i ii 13,1968} , �s D. ENVllti�l+7ME' TAL AASE TENT AND''lrEN2'ATi'�^R TRACT 3 743 : a 3'� . aPM T - A teecde tf .x s v ion and dew review � lele�atn�r lots on 14 aere4 of �Imtd „ut_ 'Medium lie liea�c� rc� Ustriet (4-8 diveif ,txdts per acre), Iota #ed .I of the west m of siren `Avenues of Banyan street _ - ` APIA: 20P S 17, 68k .(�'wtinue %?7t . riY 3S i988} E. ENVIRQ`iMEv AL ASSE3SMBNT Altl7 T)El!76I,(lP1VIFiNT ILLS CT A1 I�NDIV NT PULSAR DEVELOP A requc�t to pre -Zonr{�% a portion rnsrdino tY aninct, .,0fated area, ter ennexatlon purposes, J tti LOW Aesi hZisl, (0-4 dwrellin� units per acre),,Ioea�ted north b�`. Ilighianct' Avenue; south of Summit Avenge exte ion f , east o , the 4^reek �tt}iity Corridor, and west.of the CountrJ�Citybaundaa APN:, 2Z 161 -35, 36, 37, 38Y 49, 53, 55 Oc 61. t ENVIRONMENTAL !,�,SS1EWMENT AND. CONP)lfii®NAI, U SE, PERMIT6 -0 MOD: Ii A'� ro - UCAh't 3eTGi9 (iilfiI3 li ELL. 4.A eg4est to esceblifffadditI ml oL room t o as part of an exis€tiaig* gin in i leased spaoe of 2,064 Iquara feet r within t A existUrg alnOltrial park in the Gdiieral Industrjaj pjstrjet - 1 - 4SOubarea 4 }, located n: 0030 .Archibald Ave tiu� Y APII': 209 -171, ' G., E?t- 7IFLON iRIT'AL ASSESSMF,iiT AND Gt3NDIaigNAL USE PERM $ 15 -' WCAB `-� 'lire rcquest'to,establish eW az�ci tack sta re a leas 'sA r of 9,2200 square feet whin an existing, b t, nei3hborhocxi` 'otamerciaT cenfer' on Spit acres of, ituta��� ifi � Nbighborhocd cmWrclal .' Stritt, Alacated at the south_est cornet of C04,ilats 9treat tam e Lit. lto9 T ,-� ON: 2074,02Z�_, P Al r�. : ;, Px ,if t�' tl Aft- �1a E3NViRONMENTAL ' AUSESSMENT AND TENTATM PAR.Ct_ _dt NA1 Alb �i 1 - Ion of 1.1 , acrgs o laud t, into„ Far+ - 3s in 2ha t�th1i Specific Plaa$_i area 3; loxeatedcat the aouthwkact corner of Klusman Avn qye attd San Esarttttrslino Eto+sd - APR: '108- 151a -24. y J 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 'AN1t t, "ARs XCR SO41 'e. u i GD(. 3PTflA r,G DNt ESA EN ii i'2#IG`T - The request to reduee the r mitfinum lot Size of,. of,.S Acres to 0.218 acres Pareel 2 rind 6.0 aaa,es torFarcel 1 izt the J1i:aeE U4, dt7 . ,Distdat the :kvlw ili Boulevard Platt, I ed at the. tthwest` `etdino dornetot l�jusman San lioW,, r;A N;; 25945144, � , d. ;'rzMat �Nl'i'AY�'ASSESe E i'j xD TEfiiag , E TI%1CT 13643 S ^� 940- -'A residettA vWpn,: and doeip review b -1 S:r-'" -iiy lots on a acres, I land u� the Low idential ,. ' 13£sttlet'42 =4 dwelling "hlrep, units per lWoLW' rt the eQai side cif "Berryl Street; soutitof 18th Streit - ON: 212- K.'` B27Y1Ei0NVENTAL ASSESSMENT eA VIG' ORU .O ED ` COMRiTJ AU . DMEN $ G% OP 3AIdC O .a; i� G GAMOiiGA AnL am ;ndment to r. WO eVt areas into the Victoria Flamed Community - AM 17- 011-�;,thm 11; 221 -Bal - 4, 45, 227 ;46; - 49,1,.-,75.221 -01-01 28# 49,101 i2T -Gil I8 thjU 22x 25,49 227411-13, 3, 33¢ 227 -1'Tl 19; 227­16,1-10,24#25 and 227 f 111-27,$ 90 and 227 171 -21; 28;' 29,f,229 -0:4 48p,227- 21I,0� 30i. E,. EUMONiNFENTAL ASSESSMENT AND `` E%11Kuilk'1VCEN7' DMTRICT. AMEND _'+i�T-�8 =0 = C OB RANC O GDGAMONGA - An amendment to change Develolamo4t Diptriet designations as , they currently 'f exist to Vict4 `a 1'Ianned Oommutdty iV P4.),,for eleven alias within the Viet " , Manned CommunitK ,APR; 217- 011- 8,ihttt E227- 091 -4s i 6; 2 411-7f g 227- 001-9p 26, 49, 60; N7 -091 =. d thru 22, 25, 4�; 227-1 U _ i 1, 33, 38; 227 - 171191227- 151-10, 24,. K5 and 227 - 111-27, 30 and 1� 227171 -21; 227211 , 28, 38- 229 - 021 - 58;'227 211-8, M. CONDI'i'IONA;, USE PEi Urr 85- I91430DIFIGATION - Pe R60 - A . moth ication Wan apprlov site pFan or a ;foot ` i2 neighborhood retail cerlt�r located at. the southwest corner o� foothill Baulevar and Ramooa AAvenue in Suhar 3 �►i , Foothill Boulevard *elf ic 'Pthn, Contmtufi tp CaniMerciai, %on 3.245 ao es _t Im td - APR,- 208 -301 15,16,17. . s N. LiNVIRONNE AT ASS�ME.*T'I Alai IyisV1 C 51E iT 1' D.TS illG AMc DM l+fT'" 8-0.' ANMA1iSOAT'- A �gitest Lo c ° amend the Development 13�,s�i. map � {Plow Gt3attroil to "WW1 f low -Vedi tat taatic3entiisi, 4- dlvetling units der aerOYN! J ' a 1400 acre parcel,-` loea %d rtOrth of ilihlattd kvenu; west 'of . : y Aiiiiiken Avonue APt�t Portion. -6 20127145. W' • MIXOPDML PMM4T4w' "w ' `buW* ekv&tf0n3 of Ming 9kave builaih eta Eisttel i the gvtft ai vi-tbff'ida . � , r�tt hi, em# fide, t�' k�eTtri of sbo uft-.. �7 Q ; I�N PiR v % G ej 0Z fi'TC tD GiTc ,QNGA l.3cncro,�, DATE: April.-91"'."" 1988 U 197, is 70: Chairman and Members of the Pla:ining Casioa I' FROM,° Arad Betleri City Planner Br's Greg Gage, Asstst pt Planner j f! SUBJ.gCT: TIME E:�i'ENS1dM sm CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96, 2k ANEF PA ICEL , 9;°_°MASi --The devel.opment or a f%Stf.r P16 a' . a &re; ndustrigi park and the first pfsase�} of construction consisting of a 58,000, squa•e foot 4ini- storf*jge facility .Math a` caretaker's'' residance on -. acr,Es of land in the Industrial Park District ("Ubare��7�, loc�.ted at the - southwest corn it of Foothill Boulevaraii and Rochester Avenue e, APR: 229- 011:.10, 19,.,22, 26, 27,iand " I. BACKGROUNDi, At iU meeting of Mays" 28, 1986, the Planiting Tom ' citi ap; roved tEhe abovii0eferenced Conditional Use Pei it application ;and related Pa�Pl Map 9998. The applicant. is req�.3ting a One-year extension of time for the Conditional'�Use I Permit and Parcel Map to *(low additional time for recordation of the subdivision, II. ANALYSIS: The applicant N��s indicaged that his intent is', to proce with. ' final recordatt *n _ of —Ahe Parcel Liao, and• d +far .' development of the mini - warehouse portion of the Master Plan to a later date. In requesting extensions of time for both the-CUP and Parcel Map; the applicant would have the alternatives of compleffng <, the Master Plan as approved, or submitting a modified proposal in l the future, consistent, with the lot configurations established ;aWf) h this subdivision. Stiff is recommending a minor modification-4 Condition GAO of the Parcel Map. The condition requires that th'e building within Parcel 2 be removed by May 31, 1988, with thE� intention that this coincide with the original expiration date for',, the Parcel Map, That datoi should be changed to be consistent;�ithil the new Expiration date whie'ri will be May 28, 1989. III. FACTS FOR FXNDiNGS: The Planning Commission may grant time ex ens ons or.prp acts in 12 month increments (up to a maximum of 5 years)', if there have been, No significant changes in.the Land Use Element, Development Code, ar character of •an area within which a project is located that would cause the approved pr9j4tt to become ; inconsistent or non - conforming. 0 ITEM 8 PLAgi:c REPORT TIME . T R Swarm-STAFF cUP 8S��2IJPM 9908_ _ Mt The appft -Ved Mq'$ter ­Plxn is consistent with the Cknerai � Plan, and 'h ttie objectival and 'regatroonts of the Developent code and Industrial, Aran, - SWiflo Plans. sixth all dr ginal conditions 11 •Appl -fCaMe fw`tbo apprrivPd f1astav �r�n, the proposed use will,.. notbi be detri'montal' to, the public health, safety, or :Welfare nor wtI � it De ahaerfiaEy iu`�ious to Pfaperties or it ^Merit; irt'Yh ;k vicinity. i IV, RECt1t NDATIOA :i1 I Based p q the above facts ford findings, it is �l - reco n e # ca mason approve one -year base extensk din " s for ,Conditiana Use penat b�1,,.and Parcel Nap 9998 thrcug edoption or they kiac ed Resoluti 1 1 tRes p ally stCed,. ` <w �. o Bra erg city P ,aner �Jl i AttaikMents: Letter from Applicnn " Exhibit' "A" Locativoo Mp Exhibit »B« justes' ",Pl jn Exhibit "c" .a Parcel i'.ap,,9998 1, Exhibit 40 - Phase f `e plan „ Original Resolution Of Moroval - CUs" 85 -21 j 'Original Resolution of 4 rpval -. pm 9996 Resolution of Time Extensitty, cup 86,21 " Resolution of 7iee :Externs +fir, Pik 99" I f/ o � ; v �} � ,�s•®rrwjY ' :+c•F Bty'�.- `',...- - �'� :t� -'�4 -�lf ` �y�'�,(' fittttt[ iii f ) w ib U. itt jjI 46J..•-.. x ?n '(�r"'t.'k•sl•`° � r wz�� CITY DWISM r Q � \` `•lJ1cgGrsi � Nr. '�.S' �= �a1rr M�J•\ i y 3Altun$ !'rift lV it 4 �It' 41:ey f jjI 46J..•-.. x ?n '(�r"'t.'k•sl•`° � r wz�� CITY DWISM r Q � \` `•lJ1cgGrsi � Nr. '�.S' �= �a1rr M�J•\ i y A" we , iTi'ITiI27 "C-iz T L�€1 LLL .t I �# \V v "IN CUCANIaNGA >y t �q r}) 41 i 4- CITY OF RANCHO C AMQ1V�i xICAIM, ' 1 11 DATE: May 29, 1986, a tart 70: !r' Chairman and 'umbers of the Planning Commission a FROM: Brad Buller, cCity Planner BY: Bruce Cook; Associate Planner SOJECT: ,-ZNVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CORDITIONAL OSE PERMIT 85`!x 4 - e -aer opment o a an or a . "acre n3dus rial Para' and. this: f'irsk'p5aso of construction consisting of a 58 000 square foot mini- storage facility i I with a= coetakmr's residence on 2.95, acres of land °in the Industrial Park District Subarea 7j, ,Jocatt4 at the soutrwwest corner of Foothill 'Boulevard and Rochester Avc.Inje - APN: 229 - 01140, 19, 2I, 26, 27 an�i 2$. Related file :' Parccl Map 9998 t. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Actien Re uestedt Approval of Master Plan, Conditional use tTermir, or caretakers residence„ Phase I site putt:, and` Phase I elevations, ar4 issuance of Negative Declaration- S ,Surrounding tend Use and Z� oninyg North - Vacant land, 'TerraV.ista Planned ComrunitV South Vineyard; Industrr4l Specific Plan Subarea 8 East` Single family Residences, VineyardA,,bt' solai Specific Plan Subarea 7 West - Vineyard; Industrial Specific Plao Subarea 7 . C. General Plan Designations. Project Site - Industriai bark North - Medium Res14nt�,'al ( -14 du ac) South - General Industrial East Industrial Park West Industrial Park: [ 0. Site Characteristics: The siee is vacant ,land with tw exception Of two structures, a church and the Cowgirl theatre,, located at the intersection of Foothill and Rochester.= The),, site slopes gradually southward at 'an average gradient -of 2C« The site is abutted to the east, west, and south by vaca*tt 4" IT . CS ILANNN CWMISSJON,S . "F REPORT , iy `CUP 35 -21 • MAST U 1 ,'iiy 28" 1985 v _ Pn land, designated as Subarel' 7 /Industrial 64rk per the Industrial Speaffic 'Plan. Across Foothill to the north is � vacant land within the Foothill tom"refal Corridor of tho ?zrra Vista Manned Coam alty. A recently- ,adopted area development plan for the southeast quadrants of Terra Vist4 has designated this area -as Offipe /Medical /Auto /Commercial. Foothill Soulevord and Rochester Avenue are classified as "Special, Poulevar+is"� G II. ANALYSIS: J A. General; Master Plan: The intent of this Master Plan is to coordinate at the n31al stages of developmer►t A total - integrated design concept aver the entire planning area to maximize future? opportuniftles and -'to discourage piecemeall devalc ent which would preclude future devolopment of adjaneht' parcels in tlir . best way feasibTe.. The Master_. Plan $t a comept that will serve as a guider for future phases of developaWt through the establishment of criteria and standards- it- the arenas Of sfte Planning, circulation, drainage,, .architectural design, landscaping, and public works iaproveaeni;s,. Each phase �f devciopmeat would require separate df5cretionar� �apprQv:4 by the Pto nning ,_�5rt�ission through tin, Oppropriats '- review procedure. Thz developer har, submitted a pkrcei_,mj; igih this Master"-Plan which is also being considereC by, the Planning r- Commission, at,,th s meeting. A smiparate staff report has 'been.� f included for ya!ir review. The elements of the master•plan areas follows: 1. Land Use: The project site is located within the 0 user a Park category (Subarea.;?) within the industrial Specific Plans The objecti' a of the;,,Jndustnial Park., designation is•,tn develop a distinctive, ,attractive,, snd pleasant office park atmosphere in a campas -like sdting, with d high prestige identity. Further, per the „ Industrial Specific 11iin,.;this Site is "an important land use edge between the ; ty's Industrial -Area and comwnity oriented con- industrial ar:,a_ and is a gateway to tl e° City". Foothill Boulevard;; a�hich e!buts the pro�,ect,ite ° to the north, is classified as a Special `Boulevard, Ad"s it is the inf: nt of the Industrial Specific Plan to create A. stroetscapO environment employing" multi sVpry. bufldingz;r� L 4 that reflect a scalt, and proportion con ant with the importance of`;,Foothill as the (ity *s major eas t arterial:,. k n 6 such , the use nf. �Taz � and),cOurtyards., _ h� TT private open areiO` cbnnected s #hr the o \ .pj'j 11C. open spa;cs aloh' Foothill SM uleva;%'�to prqjide w''* gatewtay - .,the proJOCt .41 , ' LaniNcped olp � spaces �. 11 be si feifp t „� ex 4 vo i ika totti'” ip pa�t¢ec$ to pr01/i� a j r ? ?LAti�EIN6 OP1�iISSION � ,'�'tREPORT Ct}. 85 -215- MASI mo 28, 1986 77,7 Mm jt The Master plan seas been 'developed 416"g ��f�iree tiered : �sfeear�h at�i stratei Z Z. ` S yjsn ^y u int6nsive-i Ur�}a."t f'orM de'sir(A 1_baq Fr thin uTavard du; serve as the gateway into ' project. lfQ" , AIM Tafid -age plan trAnsiti€ns into � �tri of smaller pad, 1' � ;IngTe�sthr tea bture Fr61ected here irea .. " r rjiirigfc i:ti�ir+ `'e: , 'sh tia* fie anclir1 Insti utions, . I .that W �r; •. traetstfaeshs ��Y .�t1aa` the'Antetsiva urb* edt * pf tho Foothill s srr towards _ t -: gertaa�ol� . R R�i s uses Udh .aac light m11�jfacturinq.:relseardt a. s daYalop i i;� <:and atini st�Orage. . r . 2. Site .F1 1di_.�.�, .Orien ti u l t%gs have to an: 9 i�di l arc °ang`ttl },aFh eve ,one fp �j »g parainetersr l f a a But bays bealn r(us•teeO- *n .4Areai� ap oy *unities for courtyards Mid pt 1 b. Iuidfngs .and'.' landscaptra nave been Tvcai'id �`ad s ! s e jcereas n 4' s s a! ne cn c%rk3. t� :an circer atiaan An :integrat i - - - w a Y y a athi 'eYe the", - w Y a. Create an , PLANNING W14i5SION S �;F /'!EPORT „., cup 85 -21 �1;�11SI • Me e# 28j, 19$6 g ! ul c. A strong pedestrian c`ircuz "Atia" system will be provided to interconnect the GNen space network, li nking° places of work 4itt4 eating and d'rinkiog J establishments, and Other service: .uses, and minimfze, vehicularlpedaitrian conflicts - ?? d. Pedestrian - .structures 'A* fornitures•' such as � 1009ias,, celnrItades, gazebns, ', :benches, light`s ! stardar^11s kiosks, trash receptacles, etc., 4111 be inclu-4ek into tkt se a al'k `too treater a �►��' sense of prlace, and' to ponce t pearance and f6nctior of the system , 4. Architeture: the in of the industrial parj subarea. S t e creatiOA of a sophisticated, intensey land high ~^ prestige environment. the• arehitectural concept G Illustrated indicates Qrltip14Y1tory buildings along Foothill and RochW r,, that 'reflect the Otale and proportion .,consistent-�with the intensive, urban style: Sq ldin9 yles are Contempo rary in nature. employing. m varR- of° .ccAwiimentary fonts,: Mter�ials, colors and textures. Design elements suchb as ,a cent treatments, e:aellishwents,� and" ,�-frticulated building surfaces are, that ' rnarluded s nt 11- to .:ta the quality, of design. the a.treioper had sutrti:t3ed ah "Architertur4l Statement" (see Exhibit "I0) ''�i;serve.'as a' guideline for future`, development.- ,3 S. Circcrla tioi ,oar Pro nosed .circulation system a Closed ; uoP sytesr. pu,,dng internal site access only3 ee Exhibit i-%" for � aria -:street master plan) . "Three access`s Points to the site intAriln> are provided: txo on Foothill and one on Rochester. Fairtl*ill is to have a ,median ` island; a median -break will be provides only far .: the " westerly' streot access, „rnd, the easterly street access p5i6t, 111 be a right tviA,'cniy. Based an the~. projected building floor area"preposed with the &-ster,��an µr rface level parking provided is about 250 spaces sttart Q requlre -,, The devOmer has proposed': to. make tta this Short-fall by re!uiw ity, underground parking structures nor Parce '.. ' 2 -.and 3< However, as development of ' =the Master Plan proceeds, it wily -its necessary ta`meirtt n A'4-tight °acooukting of the amount: pf building in. area tie�ttiob to parking provided ?` 6. Gradig/Drar The raster grading�drairirge pxan't has.. .; epared a Z .p� to: es«ablish a xoardinated, integrated gradia coneept to ensure ttte provi 16n of ra e = z, facilities to Properly c+ra3ri.the sste r xr.r.; - •V `` 1 PLANNIVd COMMISSION S ,F'REPORT CUP 85 -21 - MA,SI May 28, 1336 Page 5 7, LandscaaRiagz Landscaping is the design element to K, used to create a'° c0sisteni;' design themws and to, unify the, entire proje #,. R- master landscape plan wouli be used to establish, -y usistert unifying desi element t rou heat the p ~oaa ��iihis could be accomplisied by specifying a °plant pallet of materials to be use4.-.. A Condition,, of �. 4proval has been added, to the Resolutlnn reauir;.� that a . master plan for landsca'pipg he sut��sit;ed., for review and approval .; ,3f the Design Review 'C ittee Orior to ;the issuance "'of `any, 04 Jjdinq peg -tits for the Phase I construction. 8. Phase IfConuitional use Permit: Phase 1 of the NastR� ` 000' sgr �are foot Mini - storage facility w1ttt a caretaker *s residence on 2.9 acres l� in the so"theasterly portldn of the site (ParceT 0. . Opilding mrientatian has all perimeter buildings boing't- f �.zry, with the interior buildings being single - story. This has the etf ct of restricting off -site lines of site =.` r canto the site irtierior from aujaces�t ,multi -story buildings: Street level v'ews into tGe site interior are restricted by the continuous �ayr rooter building except a",t the Rochester Street enteancer; Views into the site off oi' Rochester are mitigated ttrr6i6gh ,- the orientation of :the'\ wilding end directly in line with than access drive to \ ;, inhibit views into the site, and the provision of a landscape element at the building end to soft:+, its visual impact. The '`architecture proposed shows a style cansi tiant,With the intended sophisticattsd, high prestige, urban form style of ar,hite#ure presented with the Master Plan. i9ater als .include `sandbl%sted concrete ceOided with mirrored glass. Articulation of building surfacav is achieved through building recesses and embellishments are provided through the use of terraced planters. J 8. Design Review `Comittee :' The <_�Oesig0 Review Committee has "ihe�` revIewed pr`— o3ect sn Chas fosbd that the Master Plan, CUP; and ,Phase I of the development comply •pith the °Industrial } Specific Plan and are consistent with the design intent of tk.' Foothill Corridor- -in regard 6 site 1 Plt_,tsing, architectural design,' and. circulation. The Committee has recommended I I approval of the Master Plan, CUP, and Phase I of•develo anent. i C. Technical' Review Committees 'the Technical Review - Com+.'itee' _ revieee the protect anr! determined that, with the resnded S Conditions of Approval, the project 'is cansi; tent wztk, ail applicable standards and ordinances. - w ti. Crate t'omiti ttr se: The Grading Committee ee reviewed the .project and dett ;rrnined that, with 'the recommOnded-� Conditions of -Approval� the project is consistent with all applicable �. standards and ordinances. r if �s�_ PkANNING CO�JilrStGN $ F REFORi ' 'CUP 5541 M4 x Page G r E. Wderr rtundi�l 0 Existin Overhead tJ/tiiitieso i1v read ut,ii ties:fxist`a Ong sib of oc� 5wer vihue fronting the prejactftai'r retotsends that the lines a1 the praeo�s side of.the street 6'% una`prgrdunped and that additional fees be p31d. toward t)e future undergroonding of the lines on the opposite sids Sf the i-t eet. F. Envircn tal Assessment': Part I of the initial Study has burr � x=055 at t a" cant: Staff hat Completed Part II ,.af he Environmental* Cherkti -�,', and fraund no significant impacts on the enVirOnment as a,regult � f this P�ecto A copy, of Part 11 y of the Envira tal Che�kla� is ��>~ach for your review arty consideration€. Laura thp%ithe nsise lapels for the caratokerl3 res. ertce° �onfpr ii r:it at,�ftdeCds� a Condition of Approva'i hans bee:,, includes V flying tkrair.;;zn' aCOustical study be. co"ieted arscl1i j✓oa�+a��.v ntltigattoR;easurs� i��e incorporated prio��,' -'the itsuancvt of any buf1ding; er► it III. 'FACTS FOR Fn' )q '"ds p710ject is bneistent with the Senera'' Plan ,'noii5tria; 5pecifit Plan, e project, with the added Mitigation measures, till not cuase significant adverse environmental impa,ts Tn - "a diticsn,' th;�t proposed use., u, lding design anti site plan for Phase I and Mater i�lan, tugeth'r with r'ecorramendod tnnciitiod% �pf Apprevaal, are In t,"P iance with;.. the Industrial - Specific PUW4 d all Ather appliL, a provisions of the City Standards. IV,. Ct)RRESPDNDENCE• , This itam has been adpe t7 , as a public hearing in he Ran Orrt_ neuspaW� the property ;�edsted, and notices i site. V. sent to n� 5 Property akriari within �i feet of the project )�. V. RECOMMENDATION* Staff rYCotmvtnd's that the Piann.ing Cor nission � Cot15i era ', mat*r•ial an+d Input regardUg this project. If the a Con.;rission CRC`s with the findings, issuance. of a Negative Declaration anp approval of Conditional Use Permit 85 +21,,including the Master Plan, through the adop ion of,.-,the attached Resolution. and Conditions of Approval, would be in order, Resp tfully sub itted, Brad Huller Q City Planner 88,$C:cv 1 ll yf i 4 ill RESOC1iFICN tip THE Pk "K O� �5RA, Via` wy Y OP NI Rd ilo ClICAM MA, CALIFRIZ , ifr 0 pARC S. { R X9998 MNFRTIVE FARM` ,= �? r�#� �I!I,k, LOCATED Ar Tile AYE�tl ESa" ' 1 EER 0% FOOTHILL, � »i�A`AU Ago ROCHESTER r "i°ntative PArcel MP ; MOW 98 submitted by Masi `'a,r4 consisting,;Of S parcels, lactied at the sou st Zoo" Of foothill 8oulevat!d . y and k, c}:xsta` Aorerl� beir:'j a dill-for, re 4 c 11 1, ,,2' -and 3 of Marcel Map *6' , 5, id t .qty of RAMhu ICuC"On#��: COMP of San k rrtardinay Skate;, of n lifdo°hi�l, gas 0& ,�atv brdad �in Sao* - of Pa "T �pt�'^a 55 and '66, official tecorO-.6f Coon, And W* aao-t 41Z feat'of s�f the: Mai Qf Ract�est�ra in �� a City of € aktft) Cs OWWO a, I*�G9 of �rdino, 5tatar of alif srnia, a per plat recorded 14 Book � of Pi-MA Page 2a,- official reixrds of sa Cour#ty; R is . mtoll S on ,JPAY ' 16, 151864, fo l application was _ submit ,ted >' requesting rev..L. �Ghe n�vr,.ciase�ibee�. Tentative Map; and Ip'sR to Y� 28. 1986, tI* Planning Coamissf� he s4 a �s�y advertised zrabliw 1•4ijitag fmr a4te ab*sort ai ,Kri d #:cp.„ f FALL ©ifSa k1M,- THMEFORE, THE 9AtiCt"�Cift.;l 4f 1�Fl+I aSIi}Tl PIUMV0 'AS r SECi'Is3k1 -1: That the foli kia .findings have 1. That the MP AS an the en' �an. Z. n,%tL tau i�gir +taut 0 the proposed su!<�.riisipn is consistent with these ral-.91A6, That the site PtAfio -illy suitable,, for r !proposod,develo t. - ! '/I That the~prapo�eq subdivision and ft rov }nt;'fwill t , ;'not causi substvctial ,ghviromen damma , public ; ; "" health problems or have adverse of cts on abutti rig Property. MM, J. , DW 2 That this project will not create significant X86.e"' ; dmvira elz r%acts and a �ie'Ative Declaration is •issued t o #fiat' 2 , i i, ! ` SEC MIRC 3: That Tent4t,41 "t arcei flat the reco�aen onditions of M" val pertain woi ing ���98tes approved sty ect tt�, CITY OF RAKOO Ct6CAt9Qid6N ;'� REC Ltxraaw: Southwest corner of Footair1,1 Blvd.,IENTATIVE PARCEL w NO:. 999R,. ` and Rnchest_ eAeenue. l3lll'E FYLEti: Maw 15, 1586` LE. aESCRYPTIhii:Parcels %. cb3 of P 4485 [f„OTS. in the, of Rancho C'ucang ap Co of San GROSS 31.15 Bern. St. of Wif as Par `Eat recorded ASSES . ARCQ. t�0: 2_- Q ` 9 in o0 o arce a s s . 2 o icia record a ' ?�n� 4 $aid tip. en # east 2 feet of lot o . "', M Roc 0i n t o Ranc o ucanrsn a o. a#, San ern. O o a as er recor ed tt oaE a Na Maps. aae : o�1.,4 reWr�ooi•"".-' sago County , * *ats�� *,�,tt�t� *,�rx k+ �kh** ���t�r�r. ��, ti#��itek�r�` *�r�kkr�t�i��ti�te ��' ✓ DEVELIONA OiIRER - E[I�Il RASl iB Yt�Ff' Jack M. Masi SAFEE 7 . --�- -_ iota Gonsultittg Services P.O. Bo"4 P.O. Box 5531 ° Rancho Coca, C!1 9173 IS San Bernardino CA INproveaaent and dedi�xtion requireg"ts in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Cade of the City of Ran t hm GuraACxfiga 6qbut way not be limited ,. to, the following: A. DMications and Vehictilar kjj = s 1. Dedications s�iall be made of 'all interior street ri hts -of_w and all necessary! easements as shown an the tentative mto. X 2. ,Dedication shall be made of the following rights- taf -wal+ for, the w following streets ,\ (measured from street centerline); (Z� 60 feel; on Foothii1.81vd. ---ou - feet`iml OCh Stier_ Ave* feet 'on 3. Corner . property lint`: radius r Standards. will required per pity. ANIL " 4« All rights of vehicular trig` ss and egress shat] he dedicated AS follows: Foothill Blvd. Uand Rochester Ave. except far t" approved access points. „ _ a _ _— 5,_ ReciCr ell_ cues as aertis and main en -� '�ance agreemen;Is access to all parcels and joint maintenance,,fli srsurinq ry roads, drives or Parking areas shall`be Rrovidsd 4.� common C,c common ,. and shalt be recorded concurrent with the map. I 6. All existing easements lyin; _witiein future right-of �ay are to be ,quitclaimed r delineated on the map psr City nginear', v requirements. X 7 Easements for sidewalk for public use shall oe dedic ked td,the City where sidewalks meander through private propetrt"'4 �. Street ft Pursuant to tha City of Ranck, Cucasanga Municipal Code,( Title 14 Section 16.36.120, that IWbdivider may enter into, an agrtawt and' post si rity w1tw and /oity qua nnt��Ing the required construction prior to'reeordai�;an if the map g pkersait i $suaree. _ XX L Constru t full street improvements including ` but n Ij+}� lig0ted o, cur and gutter, A.C. p av�en , sider�ralicr� strive roe_ hes Y,, r:' ".� lM t f } u parkway trees and street lights 1M ael l -intek, tar $tree � . A minima of 26-foot" wide pavement Yithin a 4o'�ioot wide dedicated right -of way shall be trusted = section stxe€ets.- ,, _., . con far �t1 t�e1t.. o X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior' to building, permit issuance for a th oarcel. ur icee- r ve reel treet r Street Name Rutter pvmt. Walk °A r. Trees !.i hts Over ?a Ts ?'ud tither Foothill it X X �` 0 X X Rochester Ave. X X X X, *Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter ** Meandering. h X 4. Prior, to any work being pdrformed'in the public right- of•way, fees shall be paid and aka, encroachment permit shall l b ? obtained from the City gg neeIr s Office, in addition to, y other 4 permits Yequ reds `, X _ S. Street improvement plates shalt be A g' Prepared by � ��egistered -Civil Engineer and approved by tke .City Engineerlr Prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X 6 Developer shall coordinate, and where neeessar y� p� for =the relocation of any power utilities at necessary. - roles or other existi�jg public ', o 1, J 11' 7. Existing' lines of i2K`! or less fronting the property shall be . undgrounded. X " a, tnstaIl appropriate street name signs traffic control signs, striping and mariinui with igcatiors and types appra:ed.by.the City Eng�i ery x „ 9. Street ' N, t locatiaoos, -as `required, are tab n r e a` proved by the Souther alifornla Edis —oq C& any:.and the City_ of Rancho . Cucamon Lights r 3h,1) V ' be on .decorative -poles with undergr��,, id service. x 10. lands& �„,t `an4 irri atior lams " 9 p shall be Submitted to and approved by, the Planning ,Division prior to the 'issuance of building, perruit. , Concentrated ., drainage ;flogs shall not cross, sidewalks., Under"dewalk drains 'shall be installed to City Standards. C. x 1. surety '001 be pasted�' and an agreement e �' to ,die 4 p ; satisfaction of the MY Engineer and City Attarn guarartoeing, completion of the ,public improvements prior to building permit it�v de for eater parcel. 2. R lien agreement must be Pxecuted,OK6 to r�carding,of the for th6 failawing", map > x 3. Surety shall he pasted ani ah- agreement zXec4ted, guaranteeing compFetian oV all site drainage faCilites necessary -far dewy `ring all ^� to the satisfaction ete� the Rui'lding and Safe `)ivisan Prior o issuance of building: p; rMiUts for each parcel D. na- - aMood Contiwal d , o. X I, PriV a drainage easements for gross -Tot rains shall he required and sha11;.1se dOlneated or noticed an the final map. X 2. Adequate previsions shall be made for acceptance a,d d 1. -.010 sal of surface. drainage entering the .property from a, a4 C 3, The fallowing 5tocrm drain. `shall be insealled, Rio the satisfaction Of the City Enginleer �. 4. Prier to recordation q ' he moo, hyftlogir '-aan deal a e .,; stodge for the protect s all be SOmitaed to �tF City En gi r 3 for review.' i, 3 l o A AMnace detention basin per City Standards shall bErr' co'structed to detain increased runoff ° E„ Crd#nrt X 1< Grading'of the subject prLVerty shall,* III ag,:eraance g"•' Unifo" Nitdinci Code,, City Graedic►4 Standards- an 8ccarat�ed '' grading practices. The, linal grading plan Shall, be 11 sut_'Itantial conformance with, the approved., -concltual grad14 plan. 2. A soils report shall , � b �° prep °tired b3"' a qualified' > engineer licensed by the state of Catifortlja to' peerrom such; "!.�arle prier to issuance of btrildir�q pftrmit. 3. A g logical report shall bet prepared y a� qualifs� engineer" , 0 eulogist and submitted at thq til!k pf lieatiotl gradi ��k! nr,- � Plan the ; , o J Gq _.., 4. The final,gradi�� plan mall be subjiet't to rave and approval y the Grading-,, Comaitt(ae and shall be comp i<ec1 prior to recorditi6o of the .Final subdivision Qjp or issuance of building permit Aichaver flames first. _ X 5. Final grading pf6s for eaCb Parcel are `to be su6mi:tw .t the and 5af1E1y Oixisi4n for* approval ;PKit' to issuance of building perei t. , F: General Requir nts aWfwMvaia X I: Pernios �on other agencies will be �equ #red s follows: X Ca1Tra� for Foot'..All Blvd. Son Barh; rdi "no , ants afl� dun ret S� e��"t'�...'.�"""'"°' Ca car�,fnga bun£y Water District For se "r and wetter` � -- San ..�arnar ino County Dust Abatement (k equfi�edwap for -to.. issuance of a grading per'ait) .,,.,. Other 2. A copy of the Cove nants; Conditions and RestMetions'(C.G &R.S) approved by the Oty 1� ..Attorney is required prior to recordatton of ti;e tip.. �?i ==Provide alp �utillity so rti �s to each 16t including Sewerage,. water, /,Aectric tower, gas and telephone prior to tree constructon. X 4, r Sanitary Sevier and Hater systems $hall bo igned Lo Gucamo{:ga County Water Uistricto standar4,-, A 1�t required.,, r Of,att ptance is /f X T<t.is subdivision shall be SubJect to conditt bf '4ppro�;al irun CaiTrans. it -4. ARRt vai5 : isav� t7Aven secur -ed from ,all uti l it yes and 'osier ,agencies $veyived Approval of tai final maptY1. s be s b�ect',tO ary �eq�x Oents 'that may to recdiver3.from thO filiti` of the tentative ma " jpr � t f P= ��pprt val o, :am, sioel -but wart that seer:reaifient caPat �,;1, be aiatl'e -at �%sa timr biiildit�, e� "its are requested When b.iilbing permits F ar�' .. jaquestdd, the Cucamorigb ~panty mater D'Istrjc' , �±il�!be asked, v`:�e�^'ify, tht avdiiability of capacity. Permits viii . ,,not be fs,� unlesy 'said certification 3s received in'ri,ti+g< na-;��t°:ar c 140ned`_Va;Yls-_shalj ho ;r: d e a o;^dartoe 1, with __,,JMI Pan. � detail��traila: ia���.� ' i di,h -at inq widths, Maximo, et, Physical cdndit9ons, fj.nel �g an e,Weed control, in acc$rdrn�� �;j!h City trail standards shall be submitted to ,and, Aprbve3k � the+ igity. flan r prior. to ,_,reCvr4atidn for - a:`. �: .:,. .. s+> 1Pk6r to bu liliv g permit i i�s�sanc"' �'�'r �' _ ,a, PM-Or" to recording, ,a to shat l t be- ith tine City toyerinj the estimated Coit�rie�arr3ng; �i"` =s.nts e. u4ilerbAssessment Oxitrict ,804 -1 �� tjjj nhWly'�rea��? ���� 10. At 11tfie time of trial map s btsiitals a` f+ i7gwin� g 'shall he co��st of recorded RQO. rand U var.se; -Calt:utions °(sheets, , r a�i5,'teed at ��arencY: andro:^ showing origina3 land .4irision,'`tie notds yid ch marks mferented. � x.�..d 11., ' Notice 6f latent tai join th4 ` t�' � propottC�' A an � 4land 'Landsda i District s► rJ �, be +piled With the: tA_iy g recordattion of, ti?�e �i��aifa�a, 4 m. Special d�ditionxi X a. Any .struetert to be ctsnstr.UCtea thin 340 f thy' ce�eter.1iy of Rochostbr Avenue r kn to the c r.y p r _etio7 of, the ;D£�k Channel irspwovrxm t Pro .shall ` be °b Ided {tratectio l.measures ,based 4pow � aixr; 1.;V � , w� Aep4rx., �x 2. Any develoPnstnt to. occur within ttfe area west or,,- tr�et 'rigs prior to completion of Master Storer abr�tit� Plan l.�t <e fZ , of thc� Terra vista planned Gas errity stall be �- be- 'd aina4e'. pry; _fit {oq measures base" upa4 an apprtr.:Oi Drainage iiepoA� X r,, 3. If the 04-site stom drain systun`is to be dPSlgned with 'a snrtp conditibrt as Frotro ed, the systems shall be designed for Q}C0 with 1.5 Q100 catclpt'basin da�acity. ;i _ 14. Two me` ns a# access , sha3 i `be ° Provided to " ebb phase of the deve -ionmo and shait,hjve,a minimum paved -idth, of-�-A within o a minimum dedicated,,width lag 40' ' 1t 'r,, The limits of street and, 5Drra grain i�tproverrnt� far*ch' n � width.. 4. The repnssary easements Y,or the drainage ditch shuwn.A ong the southerly property._lira� shall be provided ''0`1_k* satisiaotion_ of th.,e 9UiIding Official.,, ' U. l 5. All sit* drainage 'shall exit'throd4h approved drafnage devi`:es to the satt.faction of the Building Official and city Engineer, Engi n 1. Motice of Intention to -join the proposed rodian Q island landscape main 2enarce district sh I be filed,4ith the City Councilz prior to the` issi ante of wilding peemift <: 2. An easement r !`or drainage from the area . to the west 'shall be provided prfor�ta the issuance of building permit"` r. ` 3. If a praject iSr to be co"Stwucted prior to the completion f the Day Creek Channel Improvement Pro3nct, the be' provided with flood pPoject an measures based upon an approved final flood report. ca 4. parcel eta 999$ shall be r corded prior to the issuance of building g omits, ATI cond do of approval are tootin €ni:�i upon final recordation of parcel ap 9998. g 5. Existix,g overhead utiiities alonggochester bvenue« f� 'PLANNING COhffiUSSION .R LUTION NO, CUP 85 -21 - MA5i Page 2 2. A Raster Lan4sope Plan for the entirep, project area shall be submitted for the review and aperovai of the 4esigre Review � � Committee prior to the Imance` of building :per,Mits for the first <pha$e Of 06 devel.oMent. . 3. Public transit �facilities' such as bus :stops shall be provided*. Detailed plans far ;street furniture, such t7 hs the bus stop, shall be,,submittO for Design Review Comittee review, and approval pr^for to, issuance" Of buil'cJng peraits befog the first phasrt of construction. _ 1 M 1. The final scouaticai report to reduce the ,iinterlor noise ftr' r the "C'i %Y ' req ui re nts for the caretakei!l s residence # Rochester Avenue : shall be subsfi:tte& fog° rei?iew, a:Jd apprOVA� l prior to issuant"f building peraii s for phase 21 A rseans of ' mondary access : shal i be pr�jvided;. ter satisfaction of the Foothill fire pistript. 3. The Rochester ntmce driveway shall:, by a mini 35 feet irk i G PLAT E� o CUP may. Pagi SING Color 2SLV nkSOLU tO /F ryQ. 8, I9$ ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONI GA _ a n'. "C 2 ?, 1938. DATE: - Apra (( x U Chairman and Members of the Planning Cop%Idksion 1977: s, FROM; 8r5d BullertrVty Planner: f \ BY: windy Norris, Asstl an* Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION Fp( %TEWATIVE TRACT 231,14 - SCHULTZ,- A 21 cos an o su s an on n acres o anal n e :Low Density Reside ✓la! District (24''dwelifng units per ac:e) located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenw and Calle 0661 �Prado - APNr 208- 921 -03 and 04. 1. DACKGPOUND: On May 14, 1986, the Planning CoinisslMn reviewed and ' approve entative Tract 13114 for toe development of 21,Iots4 Due to oconcerns with grading on the stteda condition was placed on`the map requiring ::.what a total development /design - review �yubcaittal package, including a Gradtgr� elan, building, plac ,ent, building elevations, and buildlog col =, and 1slaaterlal samples for the entire subdivision, be appr`oli ier by the Planning Commission prior to AOL recordation '0 the final -. map, A design re4:iew application was =Submitted by G.P. Lange Engineers on October 28, 1987 but as o 4et has not been accepted as a compl(%te applicatibm The applicant has; -Tndicated, however, 'that they :o intend to continue with this apolfcation. SI. k,,;- -YSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension for connforraance with ht-the current Daveiopment Code. Based on this review, staff has determined that the project meets the standards for residential development ' for 'ire Low Density Residential District. In_, addition, the p is in compliance > with tg, objectives of the General Plan.. IIi. RECOWENDATION., Staff recommends that :the. Planning Co!hmission: grant a.I yeaF extension of Vine for TrntatiV<,Tract 13114 through (' adoption of the attached Resalutian. Re Fted, d S B Cit BB: Mae t Attachments : - Exhibit VA - Applicant Letter Exhibit 'W' Location �L*p i rte► Exhibit "C" - Tract Map ! Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Resaiutian ito, 86.51, Condition '--No. 1 Resolution of,Approvai 1`CEM s.: S -own asa �r wl w sde e :a lf�.l .x.•NN i� - ��� ,I .IrNRD N. t l� i Aft U Tract 1311 Page 2 r (g) That this project, with the inipleinentation -of the Initial Study Part II mitigating measures, will no-,_, '*adverse, qW create impacts on the 'environment and a Negative Declaration is issued." attached SCCItION 2.* Tentative Tract Map No.,. 13fi� � copy of 4ich is l�hereh� hereto, I s approved subject, to ail of the fJiowing conditions and the attached Standard Conditions,. !LANNING DIVISIOI.P. °- 1. A total development /design . review bmittal, including a grading 0evations, prlan, building placement, building and t ilding colors nor., a entire subdivision shall b! subraitiad and materiNa� samples��ial to, review (±, and rov by the` Planning Commission `prior to 3�, recordation tha f� 2. The devele?o shall be responsible to install and 1a�intain the perimeter landscape parkway, on Vineyard. Avarua and'.nl�tDee1 Prado Street prior to annexation into City's ''Landscrpe Mafotanu.ce= District. A " � 3. A detailed wall plan, for the north boundary line along Cat11ti � Del Prado Stmt shall 'be submitted for review and approval- b � the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits -, i I _ prior to final map approval. ; i 4. Sloiie banks five {5) feet` or greaten (�h vartutl ?night and of j 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 4:1 sigla, -shall be at i ed with appropriate F undcover _ for eg-osion control, b the ,de theiCiCy, Planner anaBuildinga- toper, td, Abe satisi' lion of Official prior to release•, -of= the grAd,ing bond, n S. Slope banks five (5) feet or greater in vertical; height and of 2:1 or greater S10pe,11hali he.landscaped by thi: j.� r e ty owner, prior to occupancy;�and irrigated for aros control to ,and soften their appearance as'fr�llaws: one a anon or' larger size tree per each 150. square feet of slope area,,one 1- gallon,- or larger size shrub foi; -each 100 4q�rare feat of slope are' a, - 1 and appropriat*% roundcovor. III, addition, slope banks., in excess of eight. ?8) feet ,vertical ly,`,and of 2;1 or greater, slope, shall, -also include one 5- 911lon er larger i'e tram p.r ' each 250 square feet of slope area. Trees and shr3s shh'11 be �i planted in stsggered�,clusters to soft A o q en and vary slope lane+ Slope land required b this condition shall include a permanent irrigation rSySteR to be installed by the property owner prior to occupancy, AMIL i RESOLUTION NO. I A RESOLUTION OF THE WHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIPA COMMISSION 1PPROVINe A TIME EXTENSION-FOR ; TENTATIVE TRAC NO. , 1.3114 2 - 921 -03 AND 04 Ij 1 .3 A. Recitals. (i) C.P. Lange Engineers has filed an appl ration for the extension of Tentative Tract No. 13114 as ascribed to the ti )e of this Resolution. Hereinafter In this Resolution, the, subject ilme ExtonI�on request is re erred. to as "the application", -� (ii) On; May 14, 1486, this ComOssion ad .#d its Resolution No. 85 -51, thereby approving, subject to specific condi ,Lets -and time limits, Tentative Tract No, 13114 MW All legal P "erequis s to the ado on of this Resolution `crave occurred. ,c B. Resolution. ,� Q Planning G NOW. iiE_ THEREFORE. of her ho Cuc deterine;E and, resolved by the g City R' a�nanga as fit Lows: - 1. This Commission here litspecifically .E,� at all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resoluti rr b true and correct. 3. ', Based upon `substanvtial. evidence presente� to this Commission, including yritten and oral staff reports, this Coamissio, hereby specifically finos�as foilows: previously approved Tentative Map is in ta) subsubstantial compliance with `the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances: Plans, Codes and Policies; and 1, e (b) The extension of the Tentative Flap will ►dot cause significant inconsi2tencies with the curr�n'E enoral Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans;, :odes and Policies; and_ Q (c) The extension of the Tentative Rao is not"ilikeiy to cause public health an safety problems �:ingr (d) The extension is within the time 1 1,hits p1 lI scribed by state taw and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclu� fins S4�� orth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Camntission hereby grants a T114 "Exteni iol for: l i, 4� "Traci " �Applicant a ; _ E ira4LI � 13114 chultx �y G F PIANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13114 - SCHULTZ April 27, 1988.,_, 4. ft .Deputy Snretrry to this �tssion . §halt certify the adoption of this splution. a �i _ APPROVED ADOPTEtj IS 27THDAl, OF APRIL, 1988. < PLANNING `C"ISS�, DX OF THE C{W,CF RANChO , CIMMMA ff BY;, Larry T. NEW e y a !'eft ATTEST. ra d DO Tor Deputy Wrag ry g, Sra` Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission g'� Ue` City of Rancho Cucamonga, do,h6reby certify that the foiegoing Resolutidn was 6ATy and j regularly introduced, pases^d* and adopted by the Plannlnq Omission �� the City of Rancho Cucapaonga, at �� regular meeting of the Planning Goodssign held on the 27th - day a Ap�Ki, 19$Fi, 'by thee foitowing vale- ta�rrSt: `o (! C ISSIONCRSi - , z> NOES: ClSSIONERS: l� � a \ Y ABSENT: CWSSIOSi `l Q v' % C1 I4 ol `. '4' IF ` o r _ . ---- -- - - CITY OF RAWCH4 CIJQ {3t:(,-,li REPORT 'fAi £s AprIl 21, �1'988 u � - TQ. ' Chairman and Nambers of the Pigs ruing Co"ission FROM: Brad Buller, snli 8Y; Debra Meier, Assnciate Planner MJEC7: CADITIONA,L Ok PERNIT M -12 _ e n cciair maun i PROPERTIES c nThe Ve + en n e consisting of fur aur gretait r bull tota`4ir;g 319,000 square feet, at oiling, IAa7I shops to 137,39 scrki�re feet, nine - satellite retail _buildings totaling 43,660 square feet, two satellite of ffirle buildings totaling $7,326 square feet, four restaura'trt pads, and A 300000 ' square feat theater,. - MOW Appraual for a design ; center cons isting of tern Mf ngs tOU'ling 196,660 square feet. 1437 an 71 acres of land in tN °GCmmMUnity Cofter'cial District ay the Terra WSU Plmned r4moity, iocated a % . the northeast corder of Y,, ven AvOue and Foot��dl3 'Boulevard ­WW. W. 1;077 4x1, , .�, and I.A. 4fiontirued from April la, 19 *)' T„ BACKGROUND. Tfri�,q i Len tray continued from the �- meeting.--W that time„ the applicant requested a, Carttir ancegin order to allow the lees tite to racexrch their sped, is tenant needs in regarrS lu apprtrpr gate- h-Surs of tW day €or V'Wing and unloading activities. Vhe results of the applicant's SLlrvey and anY changes to Planning Condit the Planning COaVtissiort IN! ttna ore Noy 23W will be presented at s In trdditirin, thi! Ce.-mrission had requested that an Erginearing D10vitn condiltion be added that clarif td the approved median. islanki opening% On Haven Avenue and Poothil3 Boulevard. That has been -added or ithrt attached Resolution as Engineering Condition Row 8, Res Zit ly wl te: e r- 8u City - a nee Attaviments: Resolution Of Approval with Conditinr�i � Y �u �✓w�..�r r,> --- 'art.' -�� �f R£SpLUTrom qF THE RANCHC CUCM.O9GA PLANK,', APPR6 ING CQ � ITIONAL _USE PggMIT ` DEVELOPMENT 6F AN INTESRAT COi9iUNL'1'o-' SHOPPING CENTER, COWSISTXN(� OF ` FOOR Wqp RETAA , MLOINRS TOTALIW -- 3;l9,OOO SQUARE FEET, As`.;t 11jr iO `BAs asHopS TOTALING V7,3 ,95 cSQUARE -,FMa SATELLITE "RETAIL 'BU DIf ` t. tALIt ,: 43,E O UA4t r r ET,, To - aATELLfvE °Y FarICE 5UILUXX65 TOTALIMq, 2 S2Sv. S4t1 RE FED, F RESTAURAt rr PADS, AfiO. A 30,000 W11AR E FWT THEATER. CO?dCEPttfAL ` APPROVAL FOR OES, 61i ti ER 'CONSISTIt F T SUILDIOGS 1gTALB " iSS,S O i 'ME REi� _:ALL 09 TI ACRES �r4Q� Off. L 19 `fs4 C[ X349 i ERCi ` DYVOCT OF ` 'M' TERRA �V13,1 A UP °� i OMMI LOCATED AT T9�S f3ClR� COR�CEtF OF VE 'AVER027 ANO FOOTRILL l� tLE`dARI4 APR: 1077-4214 5, - �i A. Recitals., (i ��as � :n,`Qperfie �i�as filed an,applic#tion f6�_-thei' ssu&!);e of tyre Conditional .Use 'remit- +s3o. ' -I2 as ddscrtbed in -,the` titlo of ;his Resolution. Her�einaft4r' "4n this -- Resolutfbnk the ?su6,ject: Conditigna7 -''U" , Permiit request is'rex� rid to as ��.�he app, lic�� #o:� ". J fill the 27th of April,,--1988, the Planning CMi�iston"of the City of Rb*tcho Cucamonga dondqctesd a" -,dul, Mt1ced publip Searing 0,V the application and - concl,o0d said, heat ng:.t�n L *hat Aatez' Mil A71 legal pr..ereg4lsi;bes to have occ4zt"d. the adop iof* of this Res,pj� i Ft #on b'. Resolution. NOW,` THEREFORE, "yt .is hereby found, determined and. resolved by the, Planning Comission of.i'+ qty, of Rancho CUCamooga as Foll •ts> 1. This Comnisticn her y specifi ++aXly, fines that all of the facts ' set forth, in the Recitals, Part A, pa this Resolution arm -true and corrects' Based upon suo;.tantial evidendtL presented to 'thfs. Co:nm"iAsior during the atovd- referenced public heiAring or April 27, I989' ?irc�lrtli written and oral staff repot�ts, together. with" 4hjic t2stf yri> this CmmlSsion hereby specifically. finds'as,folIowsa ELF = The �applicatioaaoplies� tai property locate at the northeast corner of, Haven Avenue afid K 4hill kouleVord with ,s street.,frootage Of 12700 feet and lot depth of ti-44o ¢ {mot and is presently unimprove4, apo l A �PLAMNINrx C ISSIC-9 RESOLUTItr;4 iii. �) AE: CUP E$ -12 a 4{ESTERN ISR(iP. ' April' 27, 1988 = Fqe Z , q< lI ?Ise property to U e north of the subject' site is_ Vacant Sand, the praper°ty t kr'A+e south Of that site: coAsis#, of s�, office coivlex, t, the property to th``west is ` entertaineentfoffice co i€a;'and the prt►perty to the r,�st �, giant land. r,� 3, °Dosed upO.,�,ie tub-ev3deL,2 pii3enteeC to this Ca aissian ` during then above - referenced ,public `hearing and upon z*e sP, ifiCafirsdittgs of facts set forth its parAgraph I -and, 2 above, this Co��fi0ian hereby finis and c0cludes as C rel Ttat #* 'Orepow project Is consistent with tht, Mectf;ris of e lGsA+neral Plan; sand (b) That _ °.I ragoserR" use p is pan accord v�ii�th the gb3ecive of the Developrrrdnt Cade4 the ; erra P Vista Community Platt and tht .ourposes o th.e district in which the sitar is T4'c *ted, 41* � € (c That the--,proposed use ft' in o*[Jac wi�'r C each -of .the •. applicabl;� °jxoifsiors% of Beenoappe��-1 Code and Tarry 17VIste� C S nitXy ' -a (d) That 'tie propesed .use, togethor `wftr the,- canditii4is appliq §Ie ;thereto, will ftot be ds�ii senta►t i o the :per lic hey'? Ch ",,, $afdtty, ar welfare, or Mcterial� irdurioses t o�wperties nor improvements irk the vic'init�. , —�\ ". 4. This 06estsission- hereby finds- and certifies : , it project has been reviewed and cdnsidereif. in carspa`%.an" with the'Ct&1irs a Environmental Quality Act of 197ri ate, fc harl�: a .NaS4t1t! De_(,z1aration was;, issued on December 93 17 _ 1� "( ? , 5. Baste upon ),Ae findits,and c4lods1 ons set forth In p'a�agrapW 1, S "and 3 ebove, this Casmaissica hereby. app�_tves the app�itation S�b4�t to,, j each and dvery, corer {i'tiort set forth- below ands in the attached Standard 1 =' Conditions attachedaereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plan ion t3 (1) Any, transformers, <service areas or ,'trash; enclosures located .near thh� setbacks of haven Avenue and, Foothill Boulevard shall only b 'i,z. �� s r- , `considered wbon �,rthoy are screened by usinq d ti~ coa,ivation= of walls,,$orms and lrndscaping. SAi8IW Ct 43SS1610 kEsoLatraN NO. t ,, CUP 88 -12 - wVS'iER)t nap. Apr�j l 27, 1;988 Page � ) - Proposed ;ts' shelters 9 Havert' Avenue and _ Foothill soul av& # shall - 61tt+er be install i with the street irtiprovement or ease "i ime as - agreed'- by they City-, Egtr�w` and City Planner,$,, and shall be B:tiaf-cecturally :compatible to'the center. Final dC�igns 0 the rf = bus shelter shall be submitted for:�i�y Plannerp' > � anti. approval prior tq issuance t)f build3np�. permit. ., `i _ }tth t3 J the "co, urtyaHs- on r side of iiajor .3 shall have sim'filak design details an�d_content as the. retail' °coin near , fors .1 and 'a11or� o _'iar - tihanjes in= `shy{ Af the actuAl courtard r. area, dlesign detailL t of �tfiaase eburtyards`shall �= >tre #nclud = € :,1-final `drawings; and revf+:wed `;the and approvea ,Citr Planner prior, to issuance of building °p'or"P m. (4 * " the r6 t le shall � be ` sub'stantia3ly the same as the rtterial., ample submitted arhl Installed c� In a ,rand'omly stacked mailner. (5) , ":, accent vausxoir s(rall be wise on the:arie5 to the magax� rtxtailers. Thq locators aW final material selection shall °h6,to the`satisf etion . of the`Design,:Review Crtiit =.' Spies shaatld . be :provided for reviert afi approval { Fpror c issuance or but pelmfis; a (S }''Narking along Haven Avenue and Foothill- Boplevard "Shall be screeate ty the use of #3 foot firms and /or low.'prof le wajly l and shrub' ._ ' (7)'r The, street tree theme along Foothill aoulevar&— shall include alternating 'drifts of Platanus racemosa and Platanus acerifolia -aid shall bo;, WfCa ed,VW the final laodsrapt> plan which�IV reviewed and approved by the Planning Division " � - priw to issuance of building' permits. ll) Tl;e promenade must be clearly distinguishable along its entire route thilaugh the center. {f Spch ateans ° as lighting, ' street furniture /�., sideway' color and : pAttern, land soap��' materials, etc. shall be consistent throdSh a the entire length of 'fr a promenade. 1 lg ill courtyard areas shall 'include the 'use of accent colors., iocluding'various potted plants `�� subject to Design RdvieW Committee rapprov 'i, ,1 X11) The prdpose�2-four satelliite'buildino pad. areas if are'i approved Jh concept Y. rl �uts:fr�f( r It d' i ent for esch building pa�k-4h611 b4r subjL to tyre iDoVelupr�nt Rewie dD sirnr .8evi # Process for P;annin r g iss�ton �.pprovnl, tE2) ate design of a Uni:.forra,Sign program snali :ompliraent the architectural program. ire sign, -'' ;( program sh$11- incltDde all" on-site, signap! r i`ncTUdi .morn t signs; tkater -e, t#atil 'signs, diree't -idnal signageb etc: . `rl ai "Wom sign Program shall he subject to approval of " the Plan"ng Comiss3an ..prior to - issp am of.' building Permits. t13) 4l1 future buiuing' pads shall be seeded and.- irrigated for, erosion: ccntrs'l, Details'3�alt be incl�oded -: #tt the; ,lands:aO4 'ard irrigat��,+an - plan appr� 64 ttg. the Planning Division„ the applicant wishes to exceed the maxim-„, light standard height;' they MV aDpl fbr a variance'`er a Derelont Cade � ent. t15) Ail =: sheet furniture, including drinDc ng fountains,, - benches, trasrh re`ceptaca)s, 'etc. shalt be reviewed and approved by_ the Desigy�j .; Rev,ew tomittee pri6r,,.to issuance of, permits. (16) If phasing is proposed,.a; phasing plan shall bs� sQect to. , approval cf lie'Planring Comitsior, ' pf"i'mr io issuance of building par its. „ vk7) Architectural detail; shall be reviewed by the r` Desiga Review-'Committee prior) "-1�16 `issuance of buildi ng? permit`s. (18) The to shall be developed and m8atained :in. ` accordagce with. tht: approved. site plan whin ' `y includes av;hitec*diial elevations, - exterior rteterials and Gdlors, landscapC'ing and �reding on fill .fth the Planning Division, the co�,ditiotDs ` contained herein and ! Devela nt - Cody regulations, � f5 PLANNING COW RESDCdiTIONt© RE; CUP SS=49 - .WESTERN PROP:' April 27`,,19$& t P Page 4 w il0 lire . .;pe'destrias colanades at 8uf ding and s " "Y" ",Ploy an important rbld" in. the function of �t the corner. treatment, , Ha, "'and oQ . Weeaver f feasible suer 4 eoldnade� alt ll be -` i dcor�aor Med atound� tfre 'iwo story ;+rtions. of 0149ngs '"X" Md "Y'l PLANNING COW, RtSfll� TIR RE: 'CUP 82 -12 WESTERN PROPr . April 27, 1988 t19} Pravisfon f security patrol of the shoppird center at, least. thrte times per evening, serr days per weet butwe:en the hours of ,10100 P "M. and 940 A' g., by< - >d licensed privpt� patrol operator. , (20) irashJui�llection,Shall occur betweap tire- h:5urs of ,100 A.M. and 10:04 P.�: t2i) Graffiti• Steil be rtwvcd within 7 b_Ogrs. a t221 -7_he ntirwsite �Itiall be keptC fv�ee'o# t end„ debr:$s at all times;; grid in 30'`ev� y eras and debris remain for more t+kk t l aestty, four (24) hourrs. - (23) All ope�atiogil etrd but nesses': sha7T be 1w conducted �•to: ,coolly 1 with the )'o1lowing ti stardards, wirs�h s�`rall be incorpordtedPto the else dgreemint of atlF tenants: � (a)�> Moise lave'ls. 411 er rcia acts v ties�� shall not create atr� noise fiat �rduf AD exceed ,an• exterior nt)fse level of 60 during the hours ' of ,;10 :00 R.N. to�i:60 A.M. and :OSMA aurin±j''the hours of "'1,7 :00 AiS> 'to IQ :00 P.M. (b),, Loading ;And Unldxidin�- p No ,use he toading, unloadiraig 7psin9a ' or!, other ,.handlingii of _ biaxes� n cr4a,es, containers, b�uildirryj mate�l,ials,. 'Qr t ; garbage Bans, similar obj'acts WjtwR r 1 the ►,iour�s of 10.00 p.Pl. Qnr4 7 00: A.f�., Unless otherwise specified fietein,li in a mar herJ which mould cause `e ', noisy 0sturWce to a,residedtial ara,a.' I (24) The Conditipnal' Use Permit shall be tise 10046 IM4 ddcUMent for the apptjr terra' � Rii' Vista Jown Center. Development RE Viequ 87 • ;9 sh.dlt be considered null and v t, MV neerin�=DiviSiott • 1) Th `) existfrt, � � +tvt*Fleald 1, lit iFies (telecommunicat44 and electrical, a Me t for m' the -86 KV electrical;) ,'an then. pro 'act side of '? Haven Avenua shall undergraunded 4rr3 , the first .pole on th� souther side Of .root ill ' ` =tl ulevward to tyhe f�st. poyl,.�- ef'_ sits, Port h of I ii}l!n 4r=t�Y' �rle'•� ps...iyr bQ•:rl� �pl�i1t., 4 !!! aCr$ptarac r /utrpariGy, which►ver ors .ci 1 t „_ ' t .1( 11 first­- Th !` development may., reques a 7. �i ?JtI �C: `� i�":._1J1 .V —.. J 1 - � ,/ c"''/• .(�•" " i '!. �f � I.SV A �10 OeR Jr V M PM yJ let' a g_ dg tf RIg$r &�ggiwg it ��i tp$lE3aI. virs- UL R s! g�g a y +� ,i� i:�sw,� ig4.N FSv'5.�> i p a tl ��Nei \IM ttO�tA II ~ In �N Oil r w N I ij fit Ut� yyl YII * Y R3 La W .6 qj7W b. V a i z p r 4191 ga � � ? S.. c� N M t ��W�.� ✓. u 1 .I_ _.fA .. y�y�!•- fqp��.. ,:. ay �w,QQ.y ����N�wie '��aee.'.,�T�� Y tl M fJR C� b P° WNRN � QYI i clualfty ail .6 �• u �. �_,�o a D a V d i, $ tl +� � O s p - tl � 4,� .1411 I .- roY sD s „ /�t,_ c��v]A M �. � �Mi' �lsM +� � tl 1'2 z Mco I M 1Yi � Ey os. a jjL r` q�5�: •, Vii' ~ al I NIB � yy a I I tj I ig i .: Ij p rG C 7 w. Y+ »�Y�.•!1w�.S a.•C�q C��qS �� ' ��4.. 9 'G• e4.� L f q 4 �`Q el.s: ya wa + tW2 �6�`ert Pw}YM PRp iv 'y «. ;a Nu a- As °a ill 14's r 7 _ C`-. ov w_..ri j4.EMY a< C�S 4 M as Elm IL +1i'=q Ga 0� N +iD�g4 a 9r.tlCs° atl� W Nut,CQ "a..ap YYw .i .�^ 9. ,�}a O�.pQ @^�.��`� . O g 4p 3 j g IHIM Orgy p ^i w MTis '(�. 44 py NYr ° Yt" q D L pD! A C.�'_n .0 ayj..L. DI V arm • ' Y i =' O F m 11� D O k � 1 t. �.✓ pµ ` ` � t e .' *���� �' "�4,x�Y:r.; J� III � _ C" i��J �Y ,. .:..�- L9w O... ,. cwtr�k,. ,�j P ��- ..��j.'4*_�a- 9.2.4. �.T. "t�t�, q`sJ- 'lR..�yF- .��,i_.. ��. L•-�br-lv:-»- _-��_ � ' l �QH a fi'` a y �yyy■� X N^ �� y � C t$g�g.�t u yy!I 31:x. C 0 61 sD H _.i �Y t�V^ �. ■0 yw.� O^ � `y1`Q�j� i1YM �wsy -��; to a� Tall 14; 1 fli. I'm si e .�r�, p�(�p((��t q!_ `` tl �sN�W'■a{�i. i;p,.��y°�i l5'. Yp jN�dt~0. }YM •TINA J•.. w662 �i .. ' �■Y r.�r1 s 1 ,o 1- °�� tl d Sol fi!_8 ;11 N�Y lit TiN n i^ .+0.�•i y� � - O N Y Y it a3. � "S�. �. pp: •".2Ei- E p$MN �.�g�� '� .�iy. Rw � sgv�,��'� ����y �!• �i it �g n�Y���ww ' to feiR1 qy�� ��q A. >�w Cpl V.Yi� = '��Y O��f$. Al" iL.o � ■f� � aYK "� ■iN�■`j ■ wg: a i _ r� c jG'Y�"J p'rgw ii ptr'y+++ffi���lll�. gel N . ,6 i, O'M��,s �� Qd Yy 'phi it of � � �!, K � � b V ra N � N d W mYi f � � •R V N � � Ya � � FYO �t,i Vii.. Y} poaayy + s +Y Va aQy �L sL �w YO ~` W i 4� .ys�y r• O Y. � .�J �.C. u '.' S ,� 'O M Ya !-::.v � y y rWiia y .�.+iT 2 I O L s rY• 3- W .: uy.r� �,. ¢¢ q +t1 ♦ a i e� yy 4 6 Y '� w L y 6� � 7 =8y u RCw u v aN �4I LTZV6K - ~,it� B.w..• Y +w 6i�Y�1 t. qa �' K O i. .+:_ w Y i y Q y Y W tl_ Vi K �'NO dal �.B ]+ ,K9N iV.�a L L•`.O CL Si Y V ALT 9 -.RO iirr c c L Wp. 1 6_0 a , NAS L �a ^ �,�, ._v 1 L 3.Q qN Lli �7� O V ; K$ 9d yiy� � 11.5 Ayigw Va 121 "� lei x; 4i Ar, ® Y r� ...yrt OV ~ P �Ft� N Q list Nw A ap7u�i rt� ,�Ne U�iL TL 1. A His I "I •�3� �. pi �.�ge� tq3i'�r"' Ma ` 0 01aq•g L tea. �.• it r °�.�i is $ ", *i tide ui, ww�C�,� �� eN ryMy�,� �y�1 yi 4�+7 �� ♦i'� Al -Y Y�L,. m u •�' �lp NM w `.ji «+Wa. Q.� MC AN �y �yY p W'0`y '� `b p y/ r OI,• v a.rt L' wiyves. •4 CSj ac *Qq ^g�,pA. �iy ywy b^. yam" 4�yRA •.•'b W �' O G7. � V. •t,' �O KG 5 M A5�lr YrN �.CG 'Zip • ,e."'cp'.yw p f Oa�34 �'Iw �QQ �eL4p r^ WO C p. C •�/ \ W 4 4M wrt y 7 M }' h _d c9 i !(�s. �o � ^•mil ; `+fir' L � \l q C p ,,. to 14 Wili jr gat ITL its .�_ Mal it] HIS all C0.3 d _ ' : q`—° `w t y �~ Na• °'� V+ 3� 1+ a� �f..- r Pike �.TYO4.. EE i j ,r, N�tl ,�Y�����!' A 4 C ew +� M 'nom w M..Yl ggqIr406�•7 'S ��� " a� rc �`Z �° ''gip �3• u «� � ..0� =� �'�� �eq iii «AFL }. t t + C l JJ 's =.r }9� pp 6 ~T � C vLloC.u.a A 44O.� 1 Lk'��_iu71 oR yp y Y - _� aj . ��rs`yx r'��J �' ��}yI u: ji xv eh t , [y '. ►i Cl a a 1 � its! TLx $„$ s � -a s h7 9 r ► =g owl x �. ea s ••,_ Atli au a 20 « i{ i,4 fN p L Q r•S."j `gj�i a SZ • ° °�FZ in \ p M i �6N.._ �. YNd H�• � .� .w v`.1� �aY 4�w �� ys �. t... a oil M' N Ky' 4t1 • `q �. I�t i9 9 `�+- •�x"sr fc ell CIO r y � a p N ,y..,y6[ N M ~ W N � �.'•. .�` YP Q C� � 4 �yY � yf p f t?� Wax M■ , .,� a� p y o y Y k a � �Mi M P7Y y. • �tT _ x�Mx..YY ^ .g.. O _a �•� .G y ax: I its! TLx $„$ s � -a s h7 9 r ► =g owl x �. ea s ••,_ Atli au a 20 « i{ i,4 fN p L Q r•S."j `gj�i a SZ • ° °�FZ in \ p M i �6N.._ �. YNd H�• � .� .w v`.1� �aY 4�w �� ys �. t... a oil M' N Ky' 4t1 • `q �. I�t i9 9 `�+- •�x"sr fc ell CIO r y � a p N ,y..,y6[ N M ~ W N � �.'•. .�` YP Q C� � 4 �yY � yf p f t?� Wax ti tip �c r" ;,. €1y ?r 1 � vp MY /� �r �f:fi' ♦ice a• ' gjn fib ��' �, ""$ '• '6 '� 1�q4 :r��1s:. �r�. +�+y tj fell °�5,',�r4 7 is`?y _�• u 3 � �awLy�'•t a�it s�.A G m``.�.nt � A� to t`� ,i•� � �`4p��4.�$ Q, t" ii CITY OF R"Cr��t Ci�CA1�t3NC� , , �, Uw 6AT Wnd erl- of tire" (4409 CPWAYI FRiI Brad i3{tii`a ity� !?abr�er•,, BY: Beverly 5issen, ,As Uant Pla r v rte; suga r- v� su. AS ssmw c"INDI 7 `. it E IN red err su 4 v s 'M a - je- �-- rep a sn fasirY Es �l dcfts C��`:��td�€ i�a ��N' LOW- medium ROsU ntial l ricY 14� . 'ling'�Vott per acre;, 1p ate�d, eta the wes ,z Of kve�t a north Of bat -yan st ,r AR9: O � � ,CITY OF RANCHO ;CU"f;APJit NG.A DATE:, Aprtl­ ii; ilia AW to . tiChaiciJ4lhrtd -r� t� tiha Planning +, vita , FIII Buller. _ C1 y Pl an er _ r BY: �euar�r ►I{ssen, Assstk}ti'Pi�>�rtet`. Y S�96JEC�� °tiitf t lIS SS EA i TMAlii'£ - tt4i9R 05�"@ }r+`,1.046i1i If J* ice$ "iianfial faor s �gtr t ated ;? ' aln ,rt ia ii-ttr t't . Cxe , in%Est 1 ya 201. 1. zz PR A. AdiGn S4fd.' oral ad the sucld irc.� czar nqx; one p � tia ftt q plak" 4nd u 8. 'Pra c c D a s � l9 dpi *8ng! C. sit us !r-Qf �1. �W> Dnxity Rexident�,ial (�i3 Ali Units " rr . a .San :84MA* A, Unj�y�.t t �r re nitiu ` > 'Flew `� roY East ; -' .Av�nu�e� �i�i: �id�a�tdal �4�t� 3t�+re ;9 peg arse, rc� a r R85 �nt: !4��srtlte�� UtFi1r t31 at antes t►s,ty Aisi # *nttal':C$r�ii UitIU per �065'4 ` ort - le�us ¢ee ef FiSTaa �:.fe South East - CivIclCoomunty, !test - Low 8ed�rm Density Resmtl ' units , oqr e - '.S ° ...�.A PLANNING C9PirtISSIOm F R,Fi1RT T €NUtIVE TRACT x;4' �` April 43, i98F� t. ,3 4 E, .Site L iEpprvt�c,. ! '-�" ty�'' is CGi r #lit #y 19dFC &Rgia slnpes.. r � �""�': ement r� ��oom south. 'ML pr�stt sit tingular, n ' h# a 8(td,iu '' p etation {s lieitg�l native„ weds . and 9 4 4,v� --wt se# #t'# L't•ws'�; Zrofttl ' A, fill slope exists 1111, the gbrther �4dgr of, the pra t s is r C1selto frog :4, r#d n� Mfr s;;tiart c..�^ �a►�h = �ro;��st to �h� R® � csonstrt�Gti� 0 Tract 0103„ pertain portions off'..., " .r tha laps a�i71 fi�h±fr''t o Wvtd or expanded t�iGii "a rersinissg W01, c0001110. 4d at the hots , rs" 3;i f rod ~.kt thf ro . p o0f1',j att�ls R oS ranging r D size ai feet. - eve-;age lot r�di'99 fIL'Rtil 7i`lree "iQQr , , t pl'anx #r b#ing{: rr�6 sec! fbr A x With 1��i'i�_i��.i� r E itl�rps # ?�R three eltvtti�tsl .. �z of the # etia*t!t ; �ipsiy �S��nn#i1N 1!1 "G4dr'G �" ° s #re ti60 and pis provide i< O tt �f3,isi�Te ��t� �hlt�&rt� � r U iu Kith, s #d, .$ a.'. ##� `ix" #rte iS r ded 71a" 3 . silo # $to►y !!i h Z, 3: s ct e� ,feet srti pt aided �� 28 tives. 1 ' s a. Trails Mrtis�ry itt a k ri `.�'#.ils Rdutsgry jtte+s t'ev a pro s Fto1C r� g X98 rid r amended approval suor *t to the 'f��fty n"I" Pr f sip eues�� rail alcgn� tl k• and d 4 5foi�t widel "14nd�r4ap p# w Sid; @, # sisndarc i; �. Thy Coam itY< 'rail locsted' the flood bintNl Cistiaict Weft . to the �sauth �7Jhould ��_ c�gtlet�� f w1th the tract. R"'Ml G�l^4 tM�4�< , u -ThL% Co"ftti R� R. d Y rep e► �d the proj&t on 1PC�G�WrillerT 2 7s 1987. rre tir+g. tht -Co i+ttag deUrmir�ed tlt t ate pfo �!C �. not'stceptWe in tt� ,i"ait`ozring arms, ' 1 I atn ex mnded � parkt�a + rat than tint , iFeat� ' proposed a �n9 AVVR' 'AW,0ue , a#:ouTd ;bo- 0ovidec The Com%it a in fc#ted .acid dike: to gee ° • r feet dlt�pg the ndrttiern '44 n f t1 Site, .but thpt,' 0-40 fset.might,he acsp�cple ion sdsef.r,, end . dUao -,site corxsCrainin . 33� thn den e. r d m ar( Ao ryT fo7 expand , wkw� c whi, 0 StAt , i r, Yte ff`" -i. ,- ' PLANNIl G COWMIS10K,'_ AA, RCO '7 � TEhTATIVE TRACT S .; XAX , April 13, 1988 Page 3 ' n r "pme� iti-'W of open character" nd zaVoidr% r cf'grstfiitg" in 'surrJI'dinq - sy :the cre .Chafrey C�legO and for, c�tir�u4tforr �6f the ;©pen. space of the �rthx6ods kinch pro��t = 2.' ;Prow de iw�°otiQi►�.< ira;s :, ing aril addItiunal_.> y' l� landscciing at the end of each of the,' ct11 -d * S sacs,, u . 3. `Protride an Alftobstructed disUnr"c of at 1easj 5- to feet'betwo" the =side ofr j &h. house ano si lot reining .uralis to the PImv*., Tire wRini f7,r�: hia .south sia of ,ho�s�e _,t�t'jthe,, - n';W top ` Wp `it d Cont. Slo.,' . �Y'r�S[" �{j �! t7� a, �,miarir;of fiv_fety _ t � 4. life t at eltxap the s,040 jot$:` P tp,pi�r�ti A, �refise gra eft s" the pjas Oaigt► R�ri` Coat tutee: 4s ftiM E eric;K, Krotitil,) jA Rtmh 30,- 19W." .T'hit t� proposal dscreas ;�;he n r ,cif 'lots 7rm 60 16, 86 std in host areas, mat the ' ..;.,- car urns the . Co�rnittee} t previous bsign Review 11,904 rt Jron fenein as ell' a ;5 aditionai tree j }slanting ' fi an'`expan4 a- a (16 �feew^ vs. 15 fe�`t originally proposed) has. rho 1 eer } ro Odd" at tine" end of 4acli o the cul de- sacs � ,4sa tsnaizstruc", +�i"stanco -of at l,eaast f Ye 's�xGi}Nhas been provided in a 1 si yards except, for (� ut '4 of: 80" iota. In iddiLisnti ,the s, IIxated on io ` tier of lots are pow set back ` 1€s' `foot frord the. -s utiier�Tn rather') .art .tGre 5 feet org$riail}r propo3ec$. IC ttee MOMi rdad a roval -of the ppojmt 0 rag Corir:S. ---- ---- -- ,,; ; Y. The applicant .shoszld revise,, tie' 'MV0, �Avenus cross section - t4 reflect Tram ranter than ucal t rn, .�t i1he applid::nt tras tlti in ehe r re ist'i. sij it ;_provided` 2. Upratfe o the south el ` ratiorr r` the dtitel�reg on Lot I and, -in - :. _ eneral S provide Soate ty� of AeChitriceural detailigg?ion ail eleVhtlz0!ls,, 3p_f� vide 5 @ j thu n7$in amt type A f Gexture$r entry �Jav rat on rt rater' g 'the project, tTho` � pliCaitt hds c1 #X 3 tai h$, ^;i ti &to CO rscepfiva Landscape, PJg6,l cu PLANNING rAgrsst6N "r''AFF REPORT ' I TEPTATIVE 'TRACT 13: » KAJIMA April 13, 1988 ye d. The per #roe r wall a'i Ong, Haile" Oanue should be consistent With the development i[aeedirzfiely to the ItArth Ad should curve where' it meets the south Orly psrieeier wall, 'Care = comittee recaended this be raved by tits full Cow #ssfon tThe : 4plicaRt h, 'is curved the southern portfnn (if tit lT where it, intersects the sdrttir a - Oster t ail . In addition, the wall at "e ors ry coher hg's been moved Westward 15 feet farther from'Raveo Avenue than -the original 1 fr. 'The Haven Avenue pao y has been xp�aoded to 0 toot north cif tae 9't end ahci ,feet s th of they project *try. This parkwav` MUMS a 12 foot dedicated Commit � Tail and a e foot sidewalk- $gvond} tho si'dawalet and tracl is a 30 foot landscape eases t . north of Eha' project entry. The portion< alt . '11aven, lvonuo c: south of,, the 003rd entry has been prsrvided With a 10 fist alandcape ease""t, flue to the si nifieance Of �iatve!a Avenue: and t4rd; rox � . obi a pr,( ecc s arse e m e e �� eu s'.` i � ✓I it. Grddirta Ctittee. 1'ha p jest was `gr# inaliy. reviewed by the !" bra ®tng — a on Dec or 1$s 1987. -At, that Zino, he ! Comnittae did rot Ird approval due to +the lack of required .ai lm:f, *alit In ON* yards, a esr4t of elevation change Pe re AQUent pads, and aes�.Iiecie' aonca'►ns along the Haven Avenue ztveetscape due to extensive tali: slopes, and . retaining !�aiis° The.. redesigned projett was presented to the Grading Comittee on 04,10 14, 1M. 'The COM.Ittee ,did nqt Mowimend approval at this time and Rugg €. tWA thaf -Lott 37, %• 33, and $0 be l'G fired in drder to *Yirdnate falndSCape ftinte"ance difficulties, ors"tae slope adjacent to R #verwcad place. The coseaertts froh the 6radin , 'Comrsittae were Incarvrted into F 3��tet �ra5 a rpva can r €. fnvironmentsl 'Assessments Staff iraa cc rpleted the nv romm�n thec ` ST nd found 4 no significant, adver -se, eo-rvironmental impacts, As i �-. esult of Ois Ar`9je $. if the Plahning Co6mission c�ncur5, Qth these finding , issuance tsf a Aft tdegaive Declaration :rauld be appropriate, one tentati te. °, tract mdP �S'��pprovedk J ; r� �rt • mg� Je e � � �• � rl� �• �" � • � Y s 4 is is .P a ,'e a •� § i�' .� _ $ \ 1 gl 3 ► PLAN:N tip � � `� TITLE -fir EXHIBIT: , SCALE t z� �� aa�wr�ou a z- as ......... HA veil, slow Am: Mae 4� - .' itl�lil ��LRbNr+ We Ova ova a, f vet p��R�drof z o Imt 4 OF/cl A t GYIa ONGt r.'R.r ' T d' f� iCf ie E "j,} HEOT. LE, off Rgilr 4 f um i Y +G, • g 4�i 1xl yyy } CIS �}� !�A ♦j SIT, r: r y r xj - .STAVECY°. E dA_F9 ,Ate apis SUedECTTO' "A AMIREPORT PLAN, LIST Ti1EE It4Y0'/A MMAVA Sdd69AJW .EiUW,; VA 8l�rt�lJly�f y - .. � aaAMAwuue AdRIt.Y+N/i ✓'_ tK +- O�- Ti�E�Rt�t y l�tbt ROaAltt3 iYY. DAC Lp y MORAEA UVd 4s 9aliRlRRfy6F : Y RAF, tPg'JA=lV4 016tAi�46AMtP0�Af!a GFiOltNtp wlefts ta ' * :� QAEAMK'ICtNiS3laM6' �Ra�tMa+AA1'wut �1�,.�xtEo�c rutic a a T 3 STOW !'A4'i O AT SMIC ,�t3TR� � cif clam t. <� CF �i, iCtCtBjt Dl�O�f f�� If ?t • t f , � • t 1. �.. - s • _ _ '„ y a T : v�� 4i', 3`Yt�6� "IIY..r r 0701-02 � 4 -7�-8� PC �ae�da 2-of 5 . o o ,: r, � - ? d �; �� r i i� ti RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF;YHE PL!4NiNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlM09GA A.PP3tOVIN6 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.'13703, A RESIDENTIAL rXviV €SIGN AND DESIGN REVIEW V,,56 SiNC'E FAMILY LOTS ON Ii ACRES OF LAS V11 THE LOW: P15i RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE jL-r SIDE a "HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF BANYAN - APN; 201- 10-67 AND 58 A. Recitals. (i) Kajima Davelopatlnt has filed--an application for the approval of Tentative Bract Map No, 23703 as described in the title -" of this Resolution. Heroinsfter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Yap request is referrd to as 'the application1°. (ii) on, -the 13th of April, 1988, Otte Planning iCo�oission,4 the City of Rancho - Cucameongt conducted a duly noticed pub'iic hearing an the application and concluded said hearing on that data. j Ali legal pr+erecpisites to the adoption of this Resolution 11 have: occurred'. , D. Reso_ 1�ton, NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby nd, dsetermined. and resolved by the Planning Cor .sion of the City of Rd 0 Cucamonga as folio": I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that 411 of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of �hls Resolq ion are true and correct, 2. Based upon substantial e+ id__wz� presented to this Commission F during the above - referenced public hearing on April 13, 1988, 'including f written and oral staff reports, together with ;public testinuny, this. Cajimission hereby specifically finds as foitowse f (a) The applications afPplie3 to property located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north of Banyan with a street frontage of 630 feet along Haven ;Avenue and 795 feet along. the south tract boundary and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site, is designated for residential uses and is developed with single family . homes, the property to the south of that site consists of the San Bernardino County Flood Control retention basin, the property r to the east is Chaffey College, and the construction. property to the west is designated for single family residential and is under 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this, Ccmmissictt� during 'the abnve- referenced public hearing and upon tine specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph, 1 and 2 above} this Commission, hereby €9nds and concludes as foil ores: PLANNING COMISSION *ESOLUTION NO, TENTATIVE TWT 13. - KAJIMA April 13,. 198$ Page 2 (a) That tgntative tract is consistent with the nera? Plant,,, DevOUPO It :Code, and specOi plans; -and _ (b) The design or improvavents of the, tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific•Plan$;, and (c }. The site is P46ically suitable for the type of dMICIMent Proposed; and (d) 'The deign of the subdiv %ion is not likely to . cause substantial envOental damage and avoidable injury. -to humaans and. 'wildlife. or their habitat; and (e) The tentative ,tract is rant• likely to caus;a 1, serious public health probleo and (f) The design of the tontatfve , tract rtfTl. F,,not conflict'' with any oasamaent �icquired by the) Publfe at large, flow. of record, for access through or use of the 9roper�y within the ` proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby -finds and certifies that the project, has been reviewed and considered ire compliance with the CjTlfornfa Environmental Quality Act 1570 of and, further, this COWItSion hereby issue a Negative Declaration, S. Based upon the findings end conclusions set forth 'in" paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition sot forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein , byi thfs reference., Tract Map 13103 (1) A twelve foot dedicated Coamaunity Ecestrian Trail Shall be provided on the west side of Haven avenue and shall cennect with the trail provided by Tract_ 10027 -1 to the north. (2) The Cor mo ty Trait Tocated within the Flood.Control District 6asin to the south shall be colleted with this tract.. (3) An in -1 feu fee as tontribution,..to the future construction of the median.: islall within #aven , Avenue shall be paid to the,,-City prior to issuance of building permits br -�26ordation of the final- map, whichever occurs fir,�J, The amodot -of 'the feel Shall be the,;city. adopted unit amount for Phase IT2' times the ls! ear feet of Property fronting or, n „NaW rlveue 1t62g feet) A CAI ' _ �' PLANNING U ISSTU -'T LUTIUN N4. a TENTATIVE TRACT 137. • K'AJIMA II April 13, .199E C_ page 3 f (a) The portions of chipped curb and ev, #sting curb cuts along Haven Avenue shall be roved and- replaced with standard curb and gutter, (8) The `traffic signaii at the intersectioll of Haven Avemae and fter Lane shall bE upgraded as approved by eze City gngdneer. t` (G.) A:penhit s6i11 be obtained frwtl \the $an Wntrdino" Count; Flood Control District prior to construction i of the Comaani 794str#an Trail along the south Project boundary psi, the Cit ,S, Comm Usa Agr Bent" Alta Loma Baxira No, 2 j6htract no, 86341. (TI permZs #orr; shall also be obtained free: BCD to dit:harge Storm' drainago, to the existing outlet- steucture in the basin. -If, as detiminod by the tr final drainage study, the existing facilities a tb be removed and replaced, the _dtssi+� of tee facilities shall,bo approved by the FYood Control Dtstritt and the'City nginater. dim MY The Alta'J Loam Basin Iocat" i �iataly south of this site shall be excavated to provide suific:iont a store water reteAtion to Offset the aj fncreastd runoff generated by the developee. (9) -A =,andscaPQ .easement adfacent to the pudic street right. --* avaf shard be provided along Haven Avenue. (10) The off -site- ,portions of tots 38, 39, and 40 (Lot N of Tract 10821 =1} shall be acquired-- -,prior to approval of the final map.: Deli n Review (1) The south elevatfon Oi the dwelling on Lot 3 shall be upgraded with architectural detailing. (2) Additional arrhitt tuaal treatment, such as stucco Over wood, pi-6vided on'all elevations. (3) Textured entry pavement shall W,provided at the main entry to the Project.' The type and location of the pavement shall e: shown on the final. landscape Plans which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. The *iterial shall also be reviewed and approved by tfe City Engineer .,.,fore structural integrity prior to the issuance of building pemits., Vp �VV 4N' V F � - ,r. tl y till IS ao / i wyi r y '. nom. . Vy !'A ills 0'66Aii"ag cu is i 17!1 .,. j j, 2g j,! !,1.2 .1 .'�.'�"' jail vgi i .i 'rill MalM i U-1 r m 6pg... q� -a,w'- 91 /i1 iC "Yi �'��Y-� ..v ��' O�u��• V� 4II zfl - #= a ya Zril 'ram -H MIS 11.5 3 e a � a V s - 4, Ila 4 . 1% � Pi a -1 NEI y I is r k` as Pis e ? is .. M'"v_ I 211! k- • Y yy Y ".�y `� d��r 1iyjV -V fill" a Liz 15 4.1 rim° pig ;� �. a e > « ! �' ,� -0 th iv �ya8 wif �O�.ib - 6id i.p �°q01 C� -�, 43g -yam ps � _OAT ryY.O Lb 't V .64 �MC1 ai 4.4 C'�%CO `•w.ii .�. �ri -u��y i$y � 5.i •vw"` :uay� ,al�C awpe..�. � s �, a ri • .Y M5 ♦ r.1{ K 01. ag MR es XV Q � laR ) �iu Y« M1 y�liMpl., +�`byi �•N. *����d� �.� wy��y \j C�,rjsj 11 , M A, F 4!2.1 41".-Sul PSN It w A !tilt %="I r Io ilia -mg SIT Ild fit w r r' 1 18 _" Jt a IL v-1 St 19 4.1 Ash 3 i t 23 - � y. 2' � g_ 0 p.3 V 1 1- N 11; g yLA ♦Sy Yom{ ,iN �fY ,tl�@ ''Shea Y`14 (j yilsfiY layte 4 y y t( 1H9. i �lby� n}4 '�.'& • y a K 9ffi g w y •y et - LA 4 q mr.,» IV J Zgi' -..8 4 ; ;ru�`�s i *C 4w y N Wf V. �.• 4 �# N _IP �u M b • i� w y �v �` ii' ► !y� .•w N wa : T s ��c•Y, N d 9.Si V �Ii. qY. M +�•y S► 4 y�},C _iYY'Q aY$� em °v V= 4 �. V ■� 6 r Cti w� V C.N 3OI +p•. x�9 N MYA w C V'4�4. iw3NQ Hfi..® i ��y it i�. �q. +�Y +off Y��Y� ~rw �'•``' M��[.wwi 4CF�'y'L _ .�� a Wl � ;yGayi4w'Q �' V � M rx In 31. gal Ina 11A. A- N= ilzi C6 I -- F _ � w a 3r 88.2? - .w g 2^ c ", ^ f N PIi d� ^ Hal LUZ M:01 I I as sit fit I w girt f. Piaz sig TNT- RS gift _ y Y V mix Lip jall -air gels �:v a' a +i$ a'aa.� � �x�rs• �� e� iii a; '�'' w Q y Yp y1 ..Ni yo. p N ♦ L i1 ^ � '. t w �9 a■Qyy 4, g �MS ^54e Op �o Y t 6 }}.e J a�p�sV _. t �Ye+.QCV all Nw■ ryY. ^'tlM ^4 &,S i`Q ➢cep! 4 4 P Yis�.s1C p +if C'j p �Y V9 N Vw � � 4 Y IL .� �1l la. �7 ®�,. w _� MM;+d• SG. 'we NM p�N� +fV ag n O? Or.�. wi' WE N YC Y',�. 40— 4 -B f$ 4 C 0 � 6 O �a ■3 E4CY Y N Y O C Hit ' lr Qu Ns �.�.vW rYI 1 0.4a.v a w/l ., r �� i a� ft 66TT 4 4 u Ail hill M Y. f tl SA 'nt �wwa�y Y Vill I Its C � Ml y��g��p. ,yy�.� fib"'•. '� K`}��' � y, all r 1142! xA Lys 7.7 +�j ��,•. !� M�R4�� ¢ O s Y N 4 ! 4 MN.Y4 at t HAS -Z- m(Ly1W a » 'tlL' L di A l� y i Ay K ---, MS Y .J..K �Kh N�M j; O�v,a�l �7' •; �g i"iLL �+. t � L��� Wg.7t ref�� 1`ar ✓ Ia. N4 #L m,r.+" 6. C_f� W$m1[ Kw�i aa+iarat 116114 Jcw eft •- +' � �i 1h � i° .yyy} JI GO n Y r + W wGa �. wpw `y�O �c��r5,} y. h:.✓x �� �y 4• ._ 6 f• Ai �-- 9y AD iz i Maw+ Cw Ail allcl eayy ag } ppy, y a���yy}j y c7 .1 b j ry i� i� 4 IY p 4 �jl grit w �.. ri ■ ..lift, q t�jj ppi w Ail x ~ Z. e R : �r_y� ZZ gat �.. r"1 �, y'L Mw w�j myt O -,• r 9 � via Ito W f ; yyy «u raft s'ryV w `M 'n0.,4 gs'�*.at° tt � j O a _i '6 4 a. as � 6 ,..�- jsu AM lid qYiy�{ X1.7 y� 3V bL Iz Al Y a a4 i /r, P� std. Yt l Y V B` �L K yyy j( i yKL Y "s MM ( i '+paq of A �V rC �u WV V4 - aYa.i M pAie �� Zg� ,yt �� .. fj g4 BgKy YYN ��FF }}¢44 t1 qh � M p L N W'` y„No '��`.IL {.. f. �g. 41�{!(���y '��r■�.. Vy�`a .�,��� CWt}k.# 6 Ci.�4 V� 0. ?d Rb 411. bY4 i X . +rt e K 21 0 CITY, OF RANCTIO CUCAMONGA � 10 T t � 1, z DATE: April 27, 1988 70: Cha{ wd Hembers, of the Planning Cr�ission FROM: flew. City Planner r nine'Putrino, Assistant -Planner Q 1� SUBJECT: EIRIIRO?MENTAL ASSESMW -, iltd0 DEVELOPMENT 01$TRICT , ���"• ,� ti�'� 'E�r reques o per"rezow, arr p6ir o erne 4�n4, ount - ' unincorporated, area: (for ''anmxatipr i ppast Fdsesl to r.oa Residential 42.4 dwelling nits per'acra} ltacated slrWot Highland - Avenue,, -south (af- aft Avenue .extens�un; east .of Deer Creert� Utility rorridor, and asst oi- tho County / city boundary APPi; 225'=1 &1: -19 32, 33, 34, 35,x,'36, ��, '38, i, 49, 53, 5,_' and 61, I.' ` `PROJECT AND SITE,DtSCRIPTTQN q A. Location: North of tl.gFrt-Vid'Aven €mi south oof SM,itti � Avianue , ex ens oh, east of'•the Cveiltreek utility corridor, ardJ�Eiat of the County /City bnund4ry,!, B. Site Area: Project Site A.47 acres (gress2 Estterded Site 20.00 acres (grossl Total 51.47 acres ,(gross) €} l ` . Existing Zoning-4 San Be�hnrdino County. „Special; Development" esi en a , ngle,, amily.L D. Existin Land (Ise. Primarily vac6nt with tits excea*,t0" of one �Ifnglami;�fCb F,. E. Surraundfn2 Land Use and Zonin North FrImarl y aean , �� he EXception of and Exikting Cucamonga County Water V, ~trict Pump. atat` ion, agta Bernardino County,'Spe:,al 0ev41opn,,Itj' fps denxial, Single Family) South , Single Family; - Homes ;- '"ictoria, to Re `ident�al ,[2 � dweil-tng units' per acre; East Vacant; Et ?warda Spec4k, Pla6 "'Very Low Residet�i gal iless than,,2 dwelling unity per acref West Vacant; County of San Ber~rat°�ino "Special Cevelopneht" iResideotial, S ??igl em;lyp. Y ' f_ ci y PLl`NFiING GOriNIISSION PU AM AEV. > 6DA 88 -03 '(PRE%0NE) April 27 , 'I9C8 units F. General Plan per acre) e n ow es en ial t2- dweilin9 waits per afire) Desi nations: ro ec en Space dwelling per dens) ium Residential t -� units P Yep Low Residential U-2 dwelling per acre) dwelling units East W Low Residential (� -� ,vacant West rimari`fY he subject site rouse dfdthe site TH't G. Site C;raracteristics: one single �eiMajority �N ie excep of "7 o station. w l0i' year flood,hasin• b veg In within a a natural alluvial sera f ®othiil areas. In covered by also „found in the surrounare9 is also P vegetation i¢ adjacent: 1e family houses and adds'tion, the surrounding two ding with exception of station. undeveloped CountY.Wat° District P ®sed request for a a Gucamon9a yiie prop e � d $ rat � tha� i g Can, S with "the •., t%t ySIS• Stafif ha.. a not (pr- �� =aonsl II. SIS District neral Plan P1 th fs, dries' not General .1anf�.;o establish district Czaningi 4, re ��nu on annexation of property lire Purpose of a 4�A Qfge.:ti�fe only UP oi` Ranci��. Cucam shin regu l ati o hs rhos �a Oundari es f re gone of yrd, ertY ;., outside , s W4 of influence ”' jade in the Sam � rner for but with °tis : *-!fie sp is as ' pres V', p districts (zones) of an ordinatlye one or rndr. Same predural rerp=iremge erLY subject to the Git#f• llpon nation fur pr3p proper' the +,ot desi within re¢t�i >.... sho�f the establishing tf..e a pticdist "1Ct ,nap all be revisede motive upon Gity, LOo districts outside the „ rem 1S classificatian district or n in potential or p Shall idenwith theabel or 1°PiiE�0l5iit.G1 annexation; and lica?�le•, applicable to such p,opeCt signat�on �s maY be aPP the addition to such other m`zp request, merit Qi stri c�t' l- Mapena l i cati do (Ti is In addi #ion= toucesr�inq 1ap7entatiuersite Planning Omission -' City D) for this Project a licant is proposing a ! i38+,2p see Exbibit " 70 1988)• ,he ap conjunction with a tract ;F review scheduled :zn May, per acre consistent with the derv: of 3'.5 dwelling border drib which is alresdY within tit. adjacent. property owners General Plan. ate in and Of oolt� *ti n9 articip Staff has 'taken the liberty if they would ' e to p rte ect site- asking as part of the refiraperty`Owne ,tThe s the project ro erty once from one p their property' P to inc:uda their ir+clude City process We have mp received authorizing the (see at pro be Villiam Lyon rezonelanmeition p o erty and pronertY in this P This �' p location of this pr;, ext d both the prows tilet indicating the 11.extsnded'site and referred to referred to as „together shall be re port, p extended ;its h purpose s` throughout Lhis, P " for descrtPtion • site u O t t. 1 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DDA ,SS -O3 (PREZONE) - PUL$ AR OEV:- "{ i{ April 27, .;1935 t , !( Page, 3 AW The extended site is siOlar° to the initial 'project site. .However, the extended site encompasses, the, proposed,, Interstates�Highway 30 right- of -wsy and �a d ke.; This.,d = "ke was developed �o protect the development In the Victoria "Planned "Community 'from it 8100 gear flW.., thereby actingg� a;E a water diversion. - mP.chanfic It is, stsrt^`,s understanding that•, the dike will be relocated north of the Project site as a c4ndit 6 of the,Tentative Track Map!. r A. Surrouunnddim Land.,, Use �. Tire area "to the no -rth �Js- w #thin 'San Bernar4nno €roux y, cmpOsed of the same `hatl�ral kcohditionc as that of. thy" super site , and undeveloped aiith, the all exception c# an existing, Cucamonga County Water()0isfriet pump station. 'This area, -sA Well as the area to the Est, has been o Master planned with similar typy deveq•pt (+srts:v, of.4 S ` is that odtich is ysoposed for the "super s04 ". ri The area to the west is ,also within San airnardino County, It posed of the same natural conditions as th(it of the (`super Mte ", and encompasses two single family hem is ;.and the Southern Californfat,Edison Company corridor. AML -The .aNea to the south is par 'of the Victoria Pianned'Community whizh is developed with Lad Qensit,; (2 -4 (gelling units per acre,) single family homes. The undevelgeiQ area to the _east is KIthinr the Citty`s boundaries > ind ;incorporates se5erat hundre4'' Eucalyptus trees (windraws). This area is also a part..of the!:proppsed Tentative Tract:.Map 13812 1 r III, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff bas- completed' ,.*,'-ii:• Initial Study and rev.ewe the nv rormental Checklist, Part' ""II of the Initial Study, and has foond'no significant adverse environmental I impacts to occur as a result of the Proposed pre- zoning,, It is anticipated that any issue of vehicular impacts may be su(;cess €ugly mitigate• at the development prgiect level. IV. FACTS FOR FINOIWIlel. Deveiopmdnt District Amendment 88-03 will. not Se's£ men a co the adjacent properties or cause_ significant adverse environmental impacts. Should the Commission determine = that the amendment mould promote the land use (10als and purposes of the General Plan, the fofiMng findings must ge made for approval: A: That the subject" property is suitable for the .uses permitted in the proposed district ire terms of access, size, and compatibility with . stipq 1 and r use in the surrorilding areaF and r, and.,__,_ . Ar k B.. That the proposed district amendment uld not have a significant impact on the environ� nt nor the .;� surrou44ing properties; and v R r r I Nil 4 4 M. JO ��° "�°'� Sew' ® rSe�r aaOFGifO Fill'FIYA�. r g i <f r AMIJ AQW M Aw! - �� N .rte... f q .a o ZIP CODE 91739 �pe� P a su t p it ♦ •• r 4 a � _ pi� .r yr mwA ALL.IIR f f NORTH tilry - ITEM: DAL A ° 03 LAP PLANNKDTG DIVISION -�, yuTUTFP. _. } �' 43#�isBt /t •F 42 — r\ �•/ •H /C 3.19' AC WCMAt 4 n ♦� f PRad.�T SAM e ISAO. P1R. IAC I 4.85AC' Typ v r . 3 EX Et D 464 : -5 1IT jvr7 PfF •� ! _ ((f��fr� .. �y ni ay r aaq `6 oRm XITY OF g ITEM: - Ili ITT S T . SCALE. h1 ['13 SD- SD PROPFE RT X Y -3 FRWI RES - TO -- L OR /Lo; OENSiry .", FOftstIAL OF-VeLb TO IL-olwoj AM IT HIGHLAND AVE. L: LOW RESIDENTIAL NOATIL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT klTY OF ITEM: '- LI-A - 03 RANCHO CUCAM GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISIO N, SCALE: -LZ-s Li > 0 HIGHLAND AVE. L: LOW RESIDENTIAL NOATIL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT klTY OF ITEM: '- LI-A - 03 RANCHO CUCAM GA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISIO N, SCALE: -LZ-s 71 t 'I t Ave LL rac t Tract 138121> rrs ®!mss. �s �°� V •� ilii MVO ease mrz sdeQ aeo aac4 asa � ` -' Ufa 16M lrle l[1a eef i _ ®'!f5' WAD MON mW a� in � lase o� iL7 ale - m. mr / B 4 7 ut t i SYA. Cataf ae c ti a + 1a r .. iC CIfiE g i zi r • tProraeed Pant 1 z <�. i �'i ! �jint'HQ�. • ^ sr. a av r !"n.. CMUr ` P ° o >!! �n & t: a m a St. Lot C Ave 1 0 1 !ia a Vdfr eta CL Vict Oil �r 3" a '�M� —LC4Y , on d ci Y�tMYiC SGi uQeP itm'L q than Cr w. 4Cltld Or ZIP CODE 91739 I7 � ® P Y f PACIFIC <. ...✓ �, Rartro'p aoR a'�os,tRRd. in on � ,gyp p a St. �! G C q Rj A a 'A,` t Qalc S` �` K ��.fD EI A y 30 on g y4 Nice` p}�a i � �� • H Pf w�CdS1 19Mef ! Iron oj 191 ri LOO ° 'p)> r✓ 1� NORTEK CITY OF ., AQ RA 'C; i' t1�tC ITEM t�I�A X38 -0 i ��TLE6 PLANNING DIVISION 1. SCALP,:--9T5 ,T_RESOLUTiOW,NO _ ., ..._ A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT ° DISTRICT AMENDMENT' NO. 88 -03, REQUESTING A PRE- DISTRICT (PREZONE) DESIGNATION TO LOW RESIDENTIAL LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF SUMMIT AVENUE EJEMSION, EAST OF THE DAY CREEK UTILITY CORRIDOR, AND WEST OF 1HE COUNTY /CITY BOUNDARY APN: 225 -163 -19, 32, 33, 34 35, 36, 37, 38, 49 53, 55, AND 61 A. Recitals. (i) Pulsar Development Company )i ,js filed an a0lication for te Development District Aeendment No. 88 -03 as L�..Scribed in the title oi:,,chis Resolution. Herein&Ner in this Resolutinn, the subject Development Dfttrict Amendment requist'is referred to ;as "the applicationn. (10 On April 27, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucanan,;.m- m ductej a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. c- (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. ;. B. Resolution NOS[, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Tanning Comc ssiori of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as fol�.m : 1. This Cos�issios hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referrp�=raced public hearing` on April 27, 1908, including written and oral stair reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specificaHy finds as follows.,_,, (a) The application applies to approximately 51 acres of land, basically a sideways U .configuration, located, north of 'Highland Avenues south of Summit Avenue extlnsion, east of the Day Creek ,utility corridor, and west of the County /City boundary and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currentry designated as County of Sari Bernardino "Special Devel`i.pment" ,Residential, Single Family); and (b) The property to the north of the subject s,je is designated as County of San Fernardina "Special Development" (Residential, Single Family) and is primarily vacant with the exception of a small Cucamonga County Water District pump station. The property to the west is designated County of Sam. Bernardino "Special Development" (Residential, Single Family) (Multiple- Family Residential Distript),and is primarily vacant with the exception of two (21 single family\ houses. The property to the east is deagnated Very Low Residential' QEt&Zda Specific 'Plan) and is currently undeveloped. The property to the south ,is designateC, Low Residential (Victoria Planned Community) and is developed with single family homes; and , v PLANNING COMMISSION RCSOLUT%K NO. DDA 88 -03 - PULSAR DEVELOPMENT CO.: April 27, 1988 _ -Page-. (c) This prezontng vela provide for development within the > district in a manner consistent with =the General Plan and with related development; and (d) Thi4 prezohing is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code of the City of Rancho.Cucamongai and' r;. (e) This prezoning would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the s0roundin properties and that a Negative Declaration be Issued. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to�bhis Comission during the. abo�re- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth In paragraph 1 ,and 2: above* this Cowission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a! That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the` prcposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with exist-,tng land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed pre -zone would not have significant impact on the environment nor tha� surrounding properti -wit, and (c)_ That the proposed pre -zone is in corfo;:mance with the General Plan. 4 This Commission hereby finds and certifies +'fat the project has beer: reviewed and considered in �►wpgiance with the �Califci�n;a Environmental' -� Quality Act of 1970 a4d, further,- this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration% S. Eased upon 'the fina.ngs and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and .3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as folloits:. (a), That .� pursuant to Section 6C'S9 td 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning. Commission of the-Zity of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends appproval -on the 27th daffy of April, :1988, Development District Amenftnt No. 88 -03. (b) The Plan► >i:iy -Cormaission hereby recommends tl•:at the- City Council approve and adopt Development District Amendment`No. 88 -03 for that property described as the `protect site q and the "extended':sitek, and attached as part of this Resolution hered><,1�� (c) That a Certified Copy of this Reso4tio¢ w�related material hereby adopted by the Planning „Commission shall be faryarded to,the City Cou¢lciI. PLANIoNG C60ISSION OF 'ME CITY' & AWH CUCAl4ONGl1 ,. U r j o. sY« {arry T. 11 *1 OM mart —Brad Buller. 5W re ry ol, Brad 4jler, 'Q Uty Secretary of the Planning C �{ss o h Ciiy of Rancho CuenV009a, do hereby certItty that. the ""farego�t9t R�!utjon W&J,duly ,and regularly introdUced, passed, and adopttd by the planntog Cbmission of bite City. of Rancho Cuca a(at a tregular a�atingg oi� the alattn�ng C�ission held on the 27th da f l sril , 1;988, by the fallo+rF;o l o'� 40 -wit. AYES; COWIJSiONc,Rs: NOES: " Ci1ISSIQiiERS: ABSEkT: CaWISROMERS« : U o_ (. z _ _pLANNlje ,COWISSIQN RESOLtul6N No � ODA,8843 - PULSAR DE?� O MENT Co. # ': April 27, 1988" n G'7 I o a « Tyey �Oeputy S;cratary to this Comissidtt shall certify, to tghe ' APPROVEO'ANQ AOOPTEOITHIS 27TWOA1t'OF'APRIL, 1986« 0 W STAFF REI�9 AT DATE: April 27, 1988 TO; Ch3irMAO and Mmobers of the Pjan.,jjnj9 Cow►ission Brad Buller, City Planner Greg C-tge, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 19MROWEM� ASSESS W AND -PkiII40M USE PERMIT 87---, IFICATION M�70!;WWGA CHRISTM FEEMMM- X request to-Aistablish-40ditilan-il C an existing church In a Umsed af"Mce of 21 square feet within an existing industrial Park in the General Industrial District [Subarea I d rt 9030 h1b4ld : _ 209_171 Avenue APN _4 PRWECT AK SITE gESCRIPTION: A. .Action Requested: "Odification to an approved Conditional Use germ ft-to-ATTo—Wadditional classroom space. B. SurroupOing Land Use and Zonin Nor _fi7--- area W12-S-111-i-flessionel Center South Subarea 4,' Vacant East Subarea 4, Ctib Pump Station Rest -,�.ubizrea 4, r'IndustrIal Warehouse' C, General Plan Designations.- ilro3edf site - Fer-ATMTustrf al North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial Industrial. D. '-Site Char ,Ai-teris ties: The proposed use is located within- an exTiTTH-5 —MUM--fe—na-ht; industrijkl and war iousL-fq bwkiness eark. In addition to the existing church flMitles, �Building G' includes retail and restaurant uses, as a 4edical office See Exhibit I'D"). E. Parking Calculations- (See Exhibit #Eo) t E14 F., 11- a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP , 87 -08 -; CUCMONGA, CHRISTIAN "FELLOWSHIP -/ April 27, 1988 °. Page 2 �i II. TK NUNNO• At its meeting on July ,lo, 1285. trl� Planning syi' s°?onb approved Conditional Use Permit SS -16, est3bAshing a churciv tse within- an Ind- 6strial- .Park. located at the northwe t . corner of 7th Street and Archibald Avenue. The church subsequent Y requested approval 'of a second Conditional UserPermit (87 -08) to establish three classrooms and a multi- purpose room withfn tenant space near the i6in church facility. „The Plaanfng Commission approved the reCest at its April 22, 1587meetit,;►. The church has been operating within the center since that ti4e and h r continued to comply with 411 conditions of appraval, III. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Cucamnga ChKstiaA Fellowship is proposing to use an addiitional 2,000 square ,feet of tenant —y%pace 'within Building �B), ;G (see Exhibit. which has a total 1•to.w'_??2a of 25,;728 square feet. The proposal entails estnblisli��txo classrooms for educational and meeting, "ctivities :tc ­ioi1__ the three classrooms alizeidy boing used by the church 4�ithin the building. Use of the.new clan grooms 4ould�oscur during the ` weekend and during evening hours., a�' required by the conditions I of approval for the existing classro`zs. ` Sv, I The use of an additional 2,000 -quare feet of tenant space for classrooms is not expected to ilsignii'icantly� increase parking f demand on the site. Of ,the Wi parking spaces 1? 'aced within j I 250" feet of the dourch,unit, 46 spaces are` located along. the Archibald Avenue frontage. The amount of parking needed is based upon the sanctuary seating capaci4. The Derel'opmQnt Code requires that churches provide parking at &=ra !o of one (1) space per a5 square felt of grass floor area it thin the - main assembly area (when there' are no fixedse&ts). This standard includes parking for chum. . ancillary chuass such as-`` offices and , classrooms. No park ng conf1i „t5 between tl < - church and er uses within the center have been observed since the existing clasrroomss were -established. If future parking or other conflicts do arise, a condition included ill ' the original Resolution of approval requires that the matter be reviewed by the Planning Commission, for possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. The requested modification would” be subject to all original conditions for the existing classrooms. B. Environmental Assessment: Staff has determined the request to eTcategor ca y exempt (Class 1) from the provisions of tha California Environmental: Quality Act. III• FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is tonsiatent with the °c �w new lan an a Industrial Area Specific Plan. The proposedd ' use, together with the recommended coAditions of approval, will not °'' be detrimental to the pub'.1c hea�i�h, safety_ or-, welfare, ¢or mat£rially injurious to proper,-ti, a ,improvements in the vicini y. 1 ;4N�dTRG- COWISSION STAFF REPQRT- r CUP' 87 -08 T CUCAM N 'HRi TIAN FELLOWS , � � � HIP April ° 27, 1,988 rage >3 z; LL -= - _ t _. a ` 0 '- ^.:. r IV. 'CORRESPONDENCE:, This item ;za been advertilbA t►� ' pubIie ria: T' a ort news bpeM� t-e PVoper4' stela and .notices r' r sent p owners within 306 feet oP,the, project and , businesm. locate. in $uilftj "$": a ,111 _ V. °R��E��t tqf ATi N, .i Is reC n$ thr t,�the, isif -ba- considet a3; y!,t Pu �`. n � i, .�i t�iw�^M Y ' -� CAf to .' 1 {r C�nJ r�t iA, pp .it, , , id Comissior� .can' �u' art u stk p; ara¢ion of `a [Bice. of Exemption and .adoption of; the 4ttach d RZWutio t Woulai ,he appropriate. a Res p full ^ Ttted, �� Fj I� Z t - s d: aft nn AttacWe�ts Leiter frog Applihaett Exhibit, "A" Loc�ition Niap Exhibit IBI -- Si' e P1 &n Exhibit "C" =Floor Pian t1hibit "p" - Tenancy of sufi`dirs "G" Exhibit Eta, Psrking Analysis.'' sesolutiun of..Approval{ �a ru1 Jf ,� a 1 7 r, 4k lift IMF 3 nn T *� pzOpbsed3 rsi.te St 9o8' .xohii a fie' W3 ].X Rio usserls christisiz %Gi;?Cat� ss23 :os�sas't� that Csse -hristi x poll !*Ws4p. This sEit `va%�i kra5 p �i7q Et,Bi tr3ai, -. On Strztcit�S' moraiii, gs 4rsra B;30 B. Oprd x is �ti0 M-: n n a -•� to TOO Ito ba " �) �( S �� r normal besiness hr -,Url. 'i`B1Ot W l:L be ha " Ertlp5.0 '4:0$x. or 9'arkingr d4#1 to this f:i��s��r°f.�..'• .. '.h �. r #e need C.tfiY�''« at h -Syi} '{�qA..M�y�p.f� yqryry1y,p�pp aap/�y•'��_. a j{�.y. . is . "y�_$. ,icp [ �� %M7 ��+1`�/iA y,bbl ;.F �`�V -- 4•I••i5 .�Ae V' x141' �iky�KM�wi4F1 to our present oacxli��_ 1 _ i i �ffW7 t p Mom �itCtl r RxK Mt:I � �a5� �r��d AYiYiCbp' "�dntho CYlCitl14fi9A G'tz947s3f1'7!'�iSi9[55333 _ „ ° ° ' R a 0- �s l _ a o� o o �°° � o •c A7 7 N. V11 41 SlIILDII OW PLAJR!�IW MMYSIS arrC!re�� I of l @_ * " a v Ratio speces medicll Office 4,100 1/200 Restaurant 2,000, 1/100 20 Existing Retail 4,2W - 1/260 � 1/25a g6; j } Church 71100 Vacant Lease Space " 4.30 IAM (2) *Proposed Classrow _ Mlti- purpose Roos ' 4,0.26 ti /A 11 Total 25,7120 1/,267 average 96 1) . The church is , the use of 18 parking business hours per C.U.P. 85 -16. Additional spaUs spaces regular used #or church functions after 6:00 p.m. weekdays and cn weekends. 23 Aulti- tc-nint,industrial- use ratio per I.S.P.. 1 f CI S' r 67� rr.at: tl_P_ -ct f R� ;. PLAIN NM NVWM F D RESOLUTION r _ � 4 14:>RE50l.UTI3ti OF THE Ri(R£f 3 CUCAN ONGA PLAP91"G COMMISSION APPROVIN A MODIFICATION TO. CPNDI -T1OWL USE PERMIT $ ?- 08 FOR*TWO A0DITtEtW)CLAS,SWOOMS T-VALING 2,ODG SouARE , FEET Af 9?038 AWHIBAL0 AVEhT l$1,1HE GE'REM iNOCSSTftm r`---�`s DISTRICT - APRI 2G -i7 �1 A. Recittals. r; ' (I) The Cucamonga CWs+ iW Fellowship has filed in AppsLjation foci a modification of Conditional U e Permit No. 8,49 6s described in the.,title of this Resolution, Hereinaft� n tbix gesalart tin, the subject Gor.s}7tfional " Use Permit ,request is referred � s. "ttte ap�Iicat�on ", on the 27th of April,, 19881. the Planning 4a�i�ian of the 1� City of Rarscho Cucamonga conducted a,dily .noticed PuOic k►earipg on the -application and concluded said hearing or that Ott. (IM AiT Rego; p"rtiequisites to the adopti ar oil this Resolution have occurred,, -� � 1 B. Resolution. w, ' NOM, THE9EFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by they ,!` Planning Conmission of the City of'Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I This Cornaiissian hereby specifically finds that all of the facts 1 set forth in, the Recitals, Part .,,of this Resolutirn -are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this:;COMission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 27,, I988,, including written and oral staff reports, together with p public testimony, this Comissior, hereby sgocifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9038 S`, Archibald Avenue with a streew Iont-aee of 338 ie`et <and l�at depth ,of Rc "3 feet and is presently improved kith _1 inulti- tenant 'industrial building; and (b, :.The property to the ne�th of the subjecf; site is developed with office and similar uses, tthe property to the south of that site is vacant, the property to the east'is developed with a.water; district well and related equipment, and the ,property to the west is developed Litt an Industrial warehouse; and (c) There are 249 parking spices `.Iodated within 260 f et of, the churr,.h; and weekdays. (d) The church is limited to efface us4 afore 8C0 P.M. on u Fill 'PLANNING COWISS101i. RESOLUTIa No. CUP 87 -08 CUCAWWA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP April i , 1968 Pa qP Ji. F .4- 9aseld the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during tQ above- referenced public hearing and oon,t�e specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and .R above, 'this comeissiohereby minds and concludes as follows: (a) That the `-proposcKt modification is ri% aceard with the General Plan, the objectives of the Deveicent Code, end tho. p r u. oses of rehe ffstrict in which.the- site is 1aIgted. _T (b) Thai the proposed vicdification' together with -tho conditions applicable thereto ?0111 not be detrimental to the ubiic.' health.„ sa €eke; or welfare, or "materially injurious "to properties or i"provnts in the vicinity... tea That the proposed mods- fication complies with ehch of the_ applicable provtsions(-tof the 'Development Code, and the Industr4t'- Area e specific Plan. '- $. This Commission hereby firfds and certifies the the project has been - reviewed and considered in compliance Wlth,'the Califot�ilia Environmental Quality Act of 2970 and, further; this COWssion hereby ;issues a Negative Declaration. S. Used upon the findings and conclusions set forth inraarsCraph 2, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereon approves the application subject, tc each and every condition set forth below and in the attached- Stardat,4 Conditions attached hereto and %corpe°ated herein by thtr reference. i2I All conditions establlshed, for existing`' classrooms by Resolution W. 67 -59 S f apply fully f � to the;' requested niod fication�71ncluding all r conditions set forth for ConditYAal Use Permit 85 16. a' 1 6• The Deputi Secretary ta°_-44 Commission shall certify to tKe adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27 DAY OF APRIL 2988. e PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE CITY W RANCHO CUCAMON4GA 81: airy ,r a ,L rn�an t ATTEST: } �' r13 acT�u'J1erx epu , ecae y -y �` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �LC�s STAFF REPOT ��' DATE: April`, 1988 L9n C0: Chai rmarl and members of tta Planning Commismon„ FROM: iorad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynihra S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONM tiTAL ASSESSIENF -:;AND COkOITZi AL USE PERM 88,15 i'eged��'s`a e"`"`sab" s r �`' � an � are a spa0d of 3,ZO4=square f6it wi#in an existing or land Coeeterci l Center or, 6 acmes of . l snd fin the ohood ercilal Wstrict ra'tated at the southwest corner of Carnelian;, Street and 'Base Line Road , APN:207- 022 -03. e I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a non,- constructfon .Condi PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT "CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 08 -15 F. Parking Calculations: Type n Square Spaces Parking Use ;! Peet ; Reguirod Provided, Sunrt,ze- Center ' Restaurant Use 8,129 81 31 - Retail Uses - ,_ 87,645 351. 334 Total _432 365 Number of Member of Type of Square Parking Spaces 4,4c" Use Eqqt a a Ratio Required ;, Provided 1 Music \ 1/250 Alta 4,800 19 IS "_� SunriTe Coffee Shop 1,600 I /100 16 6 - ist Choice Video f` OO 1/250 6 6 M ,& W Cards $ Gems I,1 Hoover's I/250 6 6 Office 13bb = Detctl 1.600 r ti1/250 6 .4 C; Proposed Rancho Feed 3.,2 =q0 1/250 13 12 Total 72 6i =` II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The feed and 'tack store will operate from 9:00 a.m. oz µye., Monday through Saturday (see Exhibit A). -- B. Issues: The primary, iss:es relating to this type of use within a U-9fiborhood Comeercial Center setting our compatibility with surrounding businesses and `parking availability.,- Based upon the current occupancy within the cen ar, cdrapatibility conflicts are not expected. However, as part of'tha operation of the business, a truck with bails of hay will be parked along the rear of the due,ing business hours. Staff recommends the truck be replaced with a permanent store e structure or': s _rageo_ ny, there y jim ting ruc s presence a ver es� y The 'Foothill Fire Protection 64trict,,has reviewed this application (see Exhibit 8) and will have f;re code requirements for storage of hay eith«r Inside-or t, outside. PLANNING Ct)MiiSSTOH Si`dF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PEr,iitT 88-I5 ' a page 3 I „ J _ 1 'the Neighborhood Commercial Center <Sunrize Center) was " approved and prior to the City "t incorporati The r,t�unr. -axe C.n is currently deffcient 5 parking spuca��ee - `. parking cx1 1ST e%fdbs3 per tht, Cityls parkin staidard.. ,n: revfewing the approved site DN (see bit V) it fiaxs been noted "t th.•.plan indicates 514 parking spaces* however only 365 spaces art currently .,striped. This Neighborhood bhvpping, Center (Sunri Center) is` currently t}srked at » "space per 262 sqquuacre feet of building area. The City standaird is 1 space per 2S0 square f t.; ftstd upon t«* proposed square footage "of� 3,204: the •'feed end ta:k store will require 13 parlAn spaces. There are cbi ftntly 12 on�zit+t parki'nf spaces for this unit. The unit is therefor d9ficient by 1_ parrkin space. As a condition of approval�r staff ;recomdor that 6 additional, parking spaces ;be strfped..along '` south property lure to bring thW,_entirae centers parking up-- City standawd:. G. Env:'ronmental Asspsiant: ,Upooia review of Part of the Initial ` cosh a orr cMrf: -Ti Qttfk��,'4rviror Ks ,rttgl Checklist, staff has found ' no significant iist��'elatS qtd and tack store` located within,this ileighbo'rhoa C (x -III. FACTS F"J3t. FLIN6S ­„ - ��2 1. Thai the pro�o4e� us: s in acccrd , tfz the GeI Dan, the objective T�..he. Oeve'lop wit Code, and the pu. see of the Neighborf od wo arcial District inoafr #ch the site i,l located, 2. That the Oroposed use will not t$ detkmec�':al to the public health, "­safety or welfare, or materia113+ injurious to properLirt or improveeefts wftlifn the vicinity, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has'been advertised as a Public Hearing `in tlre�" _aa iX a port newspaper., the property posted, 4nd fia�,Hces sent to proper owne m,wfthin 300 feet of the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use erx _wT cGnditiions acrd issuance of a Megatime Cecleration, �`' �l At ItIB6 C 9T5SFOff ' lI F ROUT L'itrx rsf .Bans ho S v:: =' jn 33 &,Aaho re 9d �j t de'tobe 1988, presently+ in b 'i n+a rs in the Alta Idwa. Cc 'Village, t' expb ' 40 .it's uro'2duet -i ivad, serv�4aas into, the ".%unvlae shopping Rancho i�eed is dedicated to compiiaasi� � t%g rureu and J urtan atrso aphsra of- they Qity of tanaho- CuieamOj* t 'by " SU417ing .high ` usli� feEid4 and supplie,v for 4r>imals and .Isat, gat e pr�ella� � t� cry Rancho Peed worha to aselit the Ran*.h4" RtbeIa. ON. Club, t and -the Alts Zova Rldin$ Club, an41`oth%r Acv�i�Aties throughoutt the �a Rancho deed 's n,orsr:a,l b3,e14e99 hour are f;mm 9 :00 r *.Ii* �j 1 to 6.00 �yt� . i M ndRv, turfs 5atur4aayR Y/ �! iinrcho geed *s s ;aim presortly consists of (2) full— tirsat l errrloyees and �� gaxt� ithss et girta�tse�er - R. a� sunrise Shpz6inZ,Oenter is making ava&ble _td a s,),;'ace 14r�e %P-O t h,`tQ meet our needs, and the-refarfIi we argil t t' f° reqix*-Siing, aPPrOIIRI of, a Conditional Uee lre4tlt for .`t ro.?'tocatin ; in lq O pity ox Mancha Cuc non ag o M - it ( ! -hank you �t C `•.] `� :F1w -� ��` .ice° 0 �•..._O Of'o } •'" � C . , J d � r „%s s . K, � �,,,t �: �s" 1��. ,,�� � � * � . .::tom., . '�!` ..s. 1= 6 •r r x, e T N � � RS. '• .,2.E .._. a t Sffv zz Ata t � � e r• v o � 0 3 -- t . r � , a •i � fful� � g® �b,Qe � � f tea; •;� �r_ .�- tia a �.« -- •tea,- -.��,� � -- v�•- -°-; � ;. ,'`t a �' _.{AN,e+_�^— •-r.C. � ,"�= - � ... �y war. JI w '' �9 RESOLUTIORi N0. - A AFSOLUTi'09 OF THE RANCHO 'CUCAKOWxA PLANNING COMMISSION AP F OYIla CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NQ;` 08 -15 FOR A FEED AND TACK; STORE . LOCATED AT 8603 B;ASf_- LINE ROAD IN THE E NEIGHBORHOM C lERCIAL DISTRICT � `APR -. 207 - 4122 -�, A. Recitals. lij Glenn Nlocabee has filed an �,PpIication for the issuance of the Conditional Use . ermit -No. 88 -15 As flescribed in the title of this Resolution. Nerefnafter resolution the 'subJect Conditional Use Permit request is referred , `4 "the't- o- ,"c4tion ". On the 27th of April, 1988, the p}anning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pub hearing on the,._appli,cation and concluded said hearing on that date. I (fill All -legal prerequisites to 'thee adoption► 'of this Resolution ! have cscurred, a. Resolution. i NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca n9a as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds, . that all of the facts set fortPin, the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are tree and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission daring the abox -s- referenced public hearing on April. 27, 1988, including � written and oral staff reports, together , with` .public testimony, 'this Commissiolihereby Specifically finds as follows; (a) The application applies to property located at $603 Base Line Road which is located in an existing neighborhood Coo` mial shopping landscape center that is designated Neighborhood,Gommercial;Xv d W The property to the north of the. subject, site, is single family residence, the property to the South of that site consists of multi- family residences, the property to the east is an office building, acrd the property to the West is a flood control channel; and T.i J fc? The proposed - 'use,,would require 13 parking spaces , whereas, 12 space, are,ava fable, A toal of 432 parking spaces are required for the entire center, wh cas•365 spaces are available. 3. Based'upoh,the substantial evidence presented to-,,this C4s�assion ! 40ng the above - referenced public hearing and -upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1.:--and ? above, this Commission hereby finds and c'oncl ,Ides as follows, a n rrf PLANNING COWISSION �RE,%LjtTltM� Ct ■ L USSPEyO y r p ■.(K�4Qt APRIL 27, 108 � PAGE 2 la)tit� the Proposed Use is In accord with the ` Geneml��Plan, the objectives' of the Develo rt Code# apt, the IV purpose$ of the district in which the site Is T, ated. tbi haft th proposed use tyyether ; with the n. 'fit � ;ti; oondiiionsC` plfdabli., theeetd, wfljot not _ be �� detr a n l ti pps the <. ,.}?otslic heaith� srfetyk or Cr �` ;welfa're, Pr *erlally injurious .prapertieS or itwprdi►eR�tlirS itl�tOte #ty, = �Yicin (What th+r proposed use ctm plies with each of the ' applied #1e provision$ of the elopwt Dodo. E �l iM3 Coawtissiztnn hereby fib and `tertffies that the project has been ml and, cc%sidared in Ct�pliarce� with ths� California irlYfrorxae7►t81 Quality Act: of I97o,'and, further, this tssion �;reby Issues a getiYe Declarastion' . Based u pon ..the findings and tonclusians set forth--,in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, thi's Co"ISlirtrt' hereby approves thO' application ;subject to each and eve ry condition set ;forth be1w and in the attatho Standard Conditions dttlohed hereto and incorporated heroin by this reference., Condltions: ` II} Approval o7 £�atis request shall not ,Waive compliame with AIV sections of the. Development Code, and all other City o din4nces. If tho Operatiorz of the ` facil'4ty causes adverse � effectg upon adjacent businesses or;, operatiC41 the Conditional Use permit shall be brought bef the Planning Coawiissian for the considerdtfcl t and r ssf tile�teinatio�► of the, use. i `1 (3). fty signs progosod for the facility shall be 1 . designed in coniatrce with the Sign Ordinance and any Unifoi% Sign Program for, the ,complex, and shall requite review and approval by the Planning Division, prior to Installation. (4) Occupancy of Vie facility shalt not co�aende. e�rttil such tits as a�7 .Vnifbm Building Cade and State .; Fire ��arrhalI�`s -regulations have been co tiled J with. P� Or to accupdnsY, plans shall subtaftted �be to the othill Fire Protection: Dist and the Building a .d Safety Division to shod;, ,coappl lance , . the 2tuild� shalt be inspected far copl�anae pt^iar to oceup 4"0 e1 --� CITY OF RANCHO CUC.A,i41ONGA STAFF REPORT ld DATE: April 27, 1988;; T Chairman and Members of the P?`- lining Comission _ FROM. Barrye R. Hansun, Senior Civil Engineer � BY. Betty Miller, Assistant Civil ik)ineer a SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ' ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE, PARCEL MAP 11044 _ ` Navarette .* SuBdivisiGn of acres o - an :no. 2 parses in 110-70—O Bill Specific Plan subarea 3, located at the southwest corner of Klusman Avenue MO $An►,Bernardino Road. APN.206.151 =24 I. PROJECT AND SIT E DESCRIPTION : A. A•<ion,Requested Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel map as s 6R ..00x'Fii61 b B. Pars_ dl* Size. Parcel 1 6.24 ACv Parcel 2 0.89 AC Total 1.13 AC C. Existing_ Zoning .r Mixed Use; Subarea 3 of the anthill,Specf is Plan' D. Surrounding Land Use: - North - Single Family Residential v South - Cc4 mercial (BanK) East - Cucamonga County Water .District Offices West _-!, Single Family Residential and Preschool''` E. Surrounding General P11n and Development Code Designations: North - Mixed Use South - Mixed Use . AWL East - Utility West - .Mixed Use u p:ITER ;H ' :PLANNING COMMISe_6"A#XREPORT 'April -� 27, 1988 Pago'2 F. Site Characteristics: e existing single fiT.ily residenc &-�,_.. the; proposed Parcel l is a _deslanated Historic Landmark, Chinatown` 6so, with several :mature trees surrounding it. The proposed Pareeli 2 is vacant and slopes to +the south at a 2.5 percent grade. r II. ANALYSIS: Q A General:. c, ` The purpose of `th e Parcel` Map is to create,, two tIV separate parcels _so that the owner of the developed parcel. Pascal 1, can ttin sell vacant paxce! Parcel 2. The Cucamonga, County Water District (CCWD) is currently, ica escrow 'to, purchase Parcel 2 for future District use. ,There are na specific development plans at this time for Parcel> 2, although GCWD b3s indicated that the intended future use wuuld,be as a parking lot. ' A request for variance on nsinlmu�t Tot sites t on tonight's agenda as VAP 88 -01. The public strwets adjacent to �� parcel map are airea�r improved, p with the ; - ,exception of Parkway improvements on Klusman Avenue. Completion` w the parkway improvements on Parcel I wil}I be required with the ?Final Parcel flap.. Those on, Parcel 2 will be requj�ed upon development of Parcel B. Historic Preservation.' The existing Chinatown House on Parcel I Is t1 designate:: Historicr/ Landmark. -.,`- a Historic Preservation /1Comrmi,ssion c.;►ndittonally'' approved HS,..coric Landmark Alteration Permit 88 -0 M it's. << Februery d, 1988, meeting. °Tbw-e conditions hone been rept4ted gas Y 5pe ial Condition 5 afzthe attached Resolution. _. C. Proposed. Master Plan: F` The,�'arcel `Map is located Wthtn Subarea 3 ,cf the Fcotidl`l Specific Plan (Exhibit "C "). The site is!yin the Hel1m4-Klus wt, ?, }block, which is slated for 'i,rculatioi. i* dV4ments (Exhibit "p"), The Specific Plan requires: a circulation Master Plan, andca detailed traffic /circulation analylis For °any development propos within ,41s the block. The purposes of the Masten Plan are to det� mine the number and location `paints' of access On - Foothill Boulevard and San,,, Bernardino Road and the alignment of interior circulatYuet Within thrt block. A5 Exhibit "D" s'tows,= access to Klusman i�1venue �s " SPecifically required„ either off' public street, orate ��Street ar private driveway. _ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PtaY.ar tie =lM 11044 Page 3 The applicant has prepared a :circulation Ma''tOVIM (Fxhib.i "EN) for the eastern portion bf the Hellman- kiusmaWt,11ock, .,Since ,there 1} is.'no' development proposal at this time, the applir aht bay.) Pr6vided a 26 -foot wide reciprocal recess- easement; _d�;�Ferrt - ­the south Project boon , In consideration Of "future develo,"ent west of this site. tarf ` has agreed, to this' approac_;. � with the,, �tIM,- stand- 6iat the location and alignment" of `the IJ.sement may i be revised uPelir s4s mjssian of a detailed traffic/circulation study, at the, time of development review.. rwever,`' ,staff is coriceroed fl that all future access options, inelud %9 both publid and private streets, 'need to be preserved per the F athill,.$Pecific Plan.. �. Therefore the �a licant will_,! re aired I PP 4 to "provide ;Offet�,of Dedication for a- ,jriblic street {Spe`e af�`Cnn ition .8) on the Final Parcel Map. The City will not accept thi=,,4 fer at this time. ;r D. ;{� Future Parking, Chinatown House; The applicant provided a conceptual. site master plan for parcel 1 �r (Exhibit "F *) to demonstrate that - sufficient space would ,,be J'AavaiIable to provide parking on- site -if tha Chinatown House were 10 d adapted, for stun- resl0ential use,, such as ud ;museum. , Staff is 41ti0i -6 that an adequate number of parking,spacesGcan be provided presery.,im the stature trees' ;any future conversion of the Historic Landmark will re'quirrs «'Planning Cwrissioa approval, �through t,i development review °proGes. and anothe # alteration era,it fron 1,,he 'Historic Preservation" Lbmmissiott. -? E. ifutdre Parking, Parcel 2: - As-mention a Arevio"Iy, CCHD is acqu Ling this parcel for possible use as adZtiional employee Parking. The Development Code allows off -site i;arking within SM, feet of the structures or uses served, subject tQ City Planner approval. Since public utility ;'uses° are note permitted within. tale Mixee Use, Development District, employee ,. ;ar„in91s li .- ;� y ptiett Evadable,, to C akfD om phis parcel, When CCWD is r+eadyz,ta propose a parking lot, a Minor Development Review will be required. „ ,1 i iII ENVIRt iiENTAt. REVIEW; The applicant completed Part I of ther_Lnitlral Study. ta► cot! d%_ cted a field investigation and t feted •Part°i,I of the Iniet4,. Study. No aberse4 �10'ts upon the environment � are anticipptdd as a result of }is project, Therefore, issuance of'Nega ive Declaralopn is app,opriate,,, A�' 4 1 oV " STAFF REPORT ' 'PGANNIND Navarette - PM 11044 April 27, 1988, IY(;` CORPESPONDENCE: Notices df Ub fh i Hearing have been Senn to surrounding pry opery owners and placed i Dai -iy Report Newspaper, Pasting at' the [the site has alscz -:, n completed o Y. RECOMMENDATION., It is recoamended that the Planning Comtiissiatt consider all input an elements of th4i Ti" atige Parcel Map. If after such considerat%n, the 60iission van' �onm�end; approval, then the adoption of the attacited Resolution, and ,is�eance of 4 Negative Declaration would be aT opriate , . J` Respectfully submitted, it t3 �, Barrye Ra Hanson Senior Civil Engineer ✓, BRO RMcsd �t�t Map (Exhi "A,*) Attach14ks, Vicin� Foothil'1 tp.egific Plan Suhar'ea 3 (Exhibit "C") FSP Circulat gn,(Exhib4V4Da) ftster Plan (Exhibit -,'E ") ,' Parcel 1 Site Pl n (Fjhibit`�'F ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval ti �O r7 i 1 MIXM U" Fn F14E DID, if PART S v0T tO�.wr ^ I�?, y14, r �r zoia" { '! PARS' ! V _ it r i LCJdC 41 PA KLCU _ ,yt 7GUa Y ��•.1 ..4 C .,T ..ems, q _cl,' -RAN CUCAMON'�GA H IN`s D "ZO'�~ ,i — :> . 4.4 ' 4 s3 rl� w ,I yt IPA W" ► y:�� ! � �'.�"' _. 1U � ,�,� .1;72 � ,,i.:�, +M�`+, ��'� ci Ic L'f 7� Amt 1�i 175 n — 'r = ..._.41.._..tion - K3e�s__i�ioCk Lt�li �i t «-17 ccsgs Points _ ix—V aO , deioic¢ino Aeef�gs'e�l5nt A tircuiation., s^astar ..iah in cnnpunc*�tah tscntss!`;at points oppaWte axistict91W with z d ®taiiaod traffi ,et ouiatian an*IX!tjX roadwrtya or future traffic aic shall ho "d44_ato tl with any future dRVeiopment proposals for the sntirV' a in4 :rior` circulpalon, block' in order to datsrmirtm the follOwIng � su ¢st �r�xesr or cir�ilstion issues: V*t4.0 rat illustrated 61ya daahsd HAWS, {.? is pot they latent•. te< o A[;eass to i:an Birrnarding :i aqulre pubitn S%r"ts-,,but rath to �•, lC is the intent W *.his 5� Flank � '� Vow a conceptual 4AIgnmonz which to dizwuregs direr access and tat ,the 4mn 44 private thrrwgt�'non•reai iltigi >u from �ro ., � a dries and rtrosts. F thin on i k* i b Son. Sarm'-dirfor ROW, Tka ultj=taE efrculation master plan must shove " Ekli netcossity for *:easel;to, San eornsrdt to Ro" anti the ultimate ors r i} sites uirculation configuration `and improvB1P. ntl goo Ina W.V. VACIA 'I tit MIA- t:n.L... 4- 3 L- -, s, ',fie 46COGIR PC Ci \\ 19 ' 5 -C9 �RESOLUTION c NO.. I A RESOLUTION OF THE PIANNIM COMMISSION OF'TtIE.CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING ?ENTATIVE PARCEL CRAP WOOER 11044 t' WHEREAS, 'Testative, Parce,Map Number 11044, submitted � Are. and Navarette,,'cnplicants A r the purpose of subd?vidi'ng into pa cels, thelreal' ,2 property situated in tR�TCity of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Berpardiro, State of California# identified�as APN.206151 -24, located at th soeithwest corner of Klustnan Avenue and an 8rnard1no Road; and a WHEREAS, on April 27,`1988, the Planning Commission hej�i a duly advertiseu public hearing for thi above - described map. j 3 NOWT THEREFORE -THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNi0d C"ISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:: J t ' SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. that the iri4provement of the proposed subdivision is consistent w;th the General Plan, w o That othe site is physically suitaGFtle fo" the proposed developn °1nt. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements �a`il1 notilcayse substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2. This.Commission` finds and certifies that the project,.�has tiaen reviewe an considered in compliance with the California Environmental j Quality Act of ".1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative ParCdIL Map No, 110.4 is hereby approved - subject a 'to to ached Standard Conditions and the fol'owing'Special Conditions: 1. Storrs dr4inage facilities to Intercept cross -tot y; drainagO fr*6 Parcel 1 to Parcel 2 shall be bonded" for priors to r-eCordation of the Final Parcel map, or as otherwise approved by9 the Building Official." c> Said facile ties shall be installed upon ;either. _ 41 D( opment of Parcel- 2,, or b) Redevelopment of Parcel l , i�hidhever occurs f st. occurs first. ,.,The'Oet?�loper'Acy'raque reimburjeaten} ogre tents to reccver..an City adopted boar for trndergruustdi�ig, :i r,►deve%oment as;it occurs on the typpc .,r *hA r4 4, d td f 4-11- t south. b) Ant In-11 un0rgrt uti l,`f «if' f the p "J paid to ree ray . proper v W u fee , as cop tribzrtlan to the San half -the n future to side r to their: � Parce# Map." The fee shalt,.te the 'full City ; adapted unit, ;amount times the length frons tl;e, center w btu -man Avenue to the west,prolect 1 boundary (31011). Copies of _aroteetOt GovOants for Parcel,4 9 and 2,. approved :qty the City Attorn�',Y, shall bo required prior to recordation of the'Finai .Par -del Map. The protective covenants shall provide: a) That all mature trees on the .site .shali be retained, unless their ,removal is appeoved through the Design Revie4'P*Cocess and issuance fo a Tree Removal 'Permit, and-; RESOE.t TIP .. PAGE 2 ` 2. _The owner of the Not A Part parcel to the earth of. proposed Farce"[ shad be givent;?�oppartunity to acquirs the _0.39; x, 1.36.00' park Parcel s located adjacent to the west boundary,of Said Not .A Pant parcel, prior to recbrdaVott of the Final Parcel Map. ` lf,;sald p6riion of proposed Parcel 2, is sold to the owner 0 saaid.hO�i A Part Parcel, a lot t o`,adjusuint reflecting the land transfer wlll be re4ulred prior, t" recVdatidn of >, the FinAl Parcel Map, y. Ut lities under Iromtfng a) The existing ovekdad utilities (telec6i"unications and electri'z'dl) on the *i # .side of Klusman Avenue shall be , ` <: undergrourtded fbr,the entire l tgt ':longg W ,Klu n Averts bti'wawi Foothill Oaultvard and -. S°ara_ gerrtardina Road prior to Public ;mprwMaetW acceptance or occurincy `for Marcel '�,; *hichever occurs first. ,.,The'Oet?�loper'Acy'raque reimburjeaten} ogre tents to reccver..an City adopted boar for trndergruustdi�ig, :i r,►deve%oment as;it occurs on the typpc .,r *hA r4 4, d td f 4-11- t south. b) Ant In-11 un0rgrt uti l,`f «if' f the p "J paid to ree ray . proper v W u fee , as cop tribzrtlan to the San half -the n future to side r to their: � Parce# Map." The fee shalt,.te the 'full City ; adapted unit, ;amount times the length frons tl;e, center w btu -man Avenue to the west,prolect 1 boundary (31011). Copies of _aroteetOt GovOants for Parcel,4 9 and 2,. approved :qty the City Attorn�',Y, shall bo required prior to recordation of the'Finai .Par -del Map. The protective covenants shall provide: a) That all mature trees on the .site .shali be retained, unless their ,removal is appeoved through the Design Revie4'P*Cocess and issuance fo a Tree Removal 'Permit, and-; `R€SOLUTION v I( me h) That any sit pq,` or;; ed on 'Parcels 9 and 2 b erfu unatr the supervision of:San .. 6 a eolo�ist m 0� rovedt,by,�i ae, -City� for the < :. purWMesPdf- ,sd"ng alf valuable artifacts Oich mry be discoverdd during site devaioppen ':� . , w •s 5. The wording'-fa' tt�,�rediaracal'- access easement shati,� =; be revised to; ? ,, .Y" r a`a ProvIde access L tc�the entire block bounded -by Foothill 8ulevarc�. Sasn r ,Netla�a'AvJe� Bernardino Q0ad a�i{I kluisman Menus upon its 'development- and b) Eliminate the void uPO ea1n fee.. +Jre� et ` A reciprocal maildenanck, n+�nt :shaV.1 h Pravid d by GC&R's u in develop 4n� p any weptzwly pr`ojei: f- „ ` i. A "no parking* zo `requ�ried. on the Mast side of fronting Parcels I.arld 21 v S. Aa offer ofd ieetion,' shall, be,#iot'9ded along e t e saes h bouP¢�y Parcel 2 of fors pmsible; f `The��al public street.: t4ri"ht Steal l be, as app "ved by the City, En lin co. n. sidering the follri�► ng.. "4 a) Provi'`4e a 66` "fight -of =way att the wist pro�er� y ±, ,l ine`.df Parcel 2; and b) Curve southerly and easterly to align with Estacia Court. �,. I APPROVER A +? A O`M THIS Z�p- hAY OP APRIL 19M Y r . PLANNING CQMIS�t0't '00\,IHF CITY OF RANCNQ Cie t9 G1r BY: "_ G Carry T. McNI ; Chdi rman ,F. ATTEST: y ere Y 1 S 4 rt YC t ' t'�rd1, wi• �L w ��r, 4�•dj 1dyOr 6 i 22 ► ds Pk— JO ol 3tg� _ JIM a- t sip g • ..gyp WV- MAR Pal XPIII ' _ 1}l��wye N.. yR�..ytl V jrs Q, ZZI sw lll'ry � 9.. La'`tT �.'. 4' t.�.. �� �..�0 ���q Y'�. M �d1CaF�✓��� } � �� M O Aj x e a s orlowallow Qualms pp !! v O CC p O � s xs - 191 Z Az sWO¢y,. v°. g.Na It life- O? yd r` 11 N N H *i y � I TO f ----- , 'Cr.Y OF RAN WO C CAM&GA STz's' IEPORT 7 DATE: .Anvil 23, 1988 1' T0. Chairman and hers tit 31s »Wing Comission tsrr 1 W , FROM: Brad: Btkller, City Ptannie , BY; iw cy Fong, Assgciat* PI after ° c> SUBJECT. ENVIRQMMAL ASS €SStW.NT`A :,YAR'ANCEp8B -dL `- CUCAMOfGA ' " IiT" =°Tne Z- es • i¢'r Lce ► e regc; re n muse fl�z"e`'o` acres Ea t!,g acres for Farces; anal \—' I' 0.8g acmesibr Parcel 3, to th r x�tt ils� da�trict a� "tte � Foothit l 6.lbavard Specs# is Pa�tii oc� '^ °' ed at the so►ii~litrest cflrner of ktuse�an Avgnue and San e?errdin�a t8oad APN; 4�, .- 2ii3�t51 -24 r- - I 1. �I E. PRW!l I - j, �/- a A. Action; Re! ' r. -d ce;_ the � aa�o m n nujm�'or.i�'� 0 ff ��r Parcels s B. Surroundin Lana:�ise and Zoning.- �RflF ngie Fnm y- $ s ow D.aus-i't+y Residential District (2 -4 dwelling un ti, per acre) i South - ,Vineyard National ,Bank, Community Comsnercia: Distric1" p East - Cucamonga County tptbi.. District„ Ron-Conforming Single .1`0044; Utility District; Community " COMIM10 ,li;<tric�k - West. � Preschool, $fing,.e ,amity Roid2nce, °' Use District•-, o C. General Plan DeSi native,, ` - rfl ec�� Si a xe North -, iota D2n�tity,.,�esidentiat 424 durRtl 69 ±t403 per acreJ South - Comtwnitj�i Ca^attrCial �„ : East - �ti l i i y; Co�umuni ty Commercial ' Rest f<3ixe&`tt5e Cdr unity C W"rcial P. Site Character tl;ej . T China Mouse,. t Historic i:andmarkC ft� located a sou5Wast corner of Saar Serairdino Road and '. Klusman Avenu /N A si Viab'oe portion: �Of the site - towards the, ' south� nti: is vaca Setrora; mature trees Which ipalude a 48 inc.� rFiameter POPP;'r blee are located 1*ediately .,structure, south of the 4 �1 �% , n S -� A. Geneial: The China House wa% constructed in 1920 and used as, Inous no fof Chinese. agricultural workgrs as wo--1 ary c09Mercial store for themselve,;. it was 4signated as a Zit ✓r ofstoric Landmark bar a City C�ouneil on August 21 ,1985, v�Tihe pgrt #on aaf:e site idiately souttr ofe structure has in < - t E past yielded v ��abie artifacts of the Chinese labor force the% ;'yelp build the wteste�n raillroads and worked in tlhe { 'i f co�aunityr's�gr�ir►g agricu�lt�ral industry, � � '� j c 5, RadUCtiart of Lot S'zet' `the rainiswAr lot site ret�uir.ir: toe x se s r c�� " ffi's� inM lot .:s #ze #or p�pas� Arircel 1 an cres arcE,' El.89 &ccs respectively, the ot+ er tiirs. Mavarettel of this site. has requested to parcel off the Mi'm ffouse frog tb*, vacant port¢on of the property to rthe. South for the pur; se "of selling it. The Cucamonga county 4.4ter'n#atrict Is currently ire escrow wi firs. Wavarette to piirCiti{se this vacant p�►rxioi`1: CMo `have na plans for ImOrovellenf at this tirse. Mrs. Havarette will.Nretain ownership of :the Gina house As a residencg� And `v,as no intention of f0prOving the residence Qr the proporfy. ' In rearietieing the proposal, staff finds that the site is unique and different from -tire neighbar16g properties, The reason is G that the si cnnta ins-ah Hittot�ic Landmark - China House, By :creating a: }. rce� Parcel 14 for Chilwa House w4t� sufficient area, to, acc' date future Oarking spaces, it will have an , opportunity to - baoadapted tq a non-residential- use such as a ' museum. It will prctc-ct China House frzw being p( :- roached by a conflicting use. Parcel 2 is vacant anrt crucial' to the future­ -`` development of tree block be wee6 Heilman _Manue and Musman Avenue. The reason is,`,that the Foothill SoOlavard Specific Plan requires an interior east /west: circulation spire between the block of foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road so as to relieve traffic off these bm streets. By creating parcel 2, the site will facilitate development of this Parcer °.and the inte0or eas ;' st circulation. presently;: CC�fp intends to acquire _ '; �. 0decel for future panting needs, �wha ",ch would provide ci*patibility of use to the 'China Ho ae. given l.hough ; CCH! saav 0060 not to pursue- this proposal, they {could sell W the parcel`: It would they; allow developer to accaaire it and assemble all others parcels` in order to develop a Masi•er+ ° Plan that achieves thi'best use for the area, ;. s , v A {(k = .,PLANNIMG CbAM1 ON �tAPF R OgT VARIANCE M,-01 - ,CUCflMOW Ct�SIRiY WATER, DiST. April 27, 1988 ;, q q n L " "C 'PLANNXNG C"ISSION ST ;FF REPORT VARIANCE 88 -01 CUCAMONGA COUNiY HATER bIST. j' Am4l R7, 1988 _ > pr�,,, 3 - All I: C. Historic Preservationxission: ,The Commission reviewed the T. OR arce; g*—_-' ; wFa�ruary 4, 1988 and app�rave4_-the� Landmark Alteratic,,rPe!it subject to the follotiting`oondit%nst 0 1.. That a Rrotect ve covenant be recorded with Parcels. and 2-of Parcti " Map ,I1044'ta pravide'the,following: A That all mature frees ,on the site sha'l'r ;=Z; i , retained unless, the medal is approved through ,11 the Design} Review process and issuance of a Tree Removal Permit, and b. That any site wofk perfo d on Parcels 1 �7nd 2" be performed under thV.7�",L supervision of dn' ;` �,. arc ieologist approOd ;i the , City Poi the purpose of saving all- varlable oistoric artifacts'` ahiclh nsay ' be dissevered ,such _ site,, �( development.' \ The above conditions )rave :'been added to tine Reso'�*.iion of Approval for the Parcel ,Map,. 0 0. Environmental Assessment: ,Staff has completed-Part II of, the nv romm�neua ec & d determined that then -e will not be —� significant impacts as` a �' It *his proposed: Vkr'lange a�n the related Parcel Map.,/;-1f = the Ptacning - Cemission, concurs -­ with these findings, Iss6t'0% of a Ticg.tive Declaration would be appropriate.,. III. FACTS FOB :FINDINGS: In order for the `�+: °ao offing Commission to ` =Pi facts t6 tuppor'« the followira findings approyt�` -Y , ance smist bei)ndde: 1 7, That strict or l j � eral interpretAt -on and on orcement „ I of the specified `-regulation would rWu' -, i � ractical difficulty cr ,,unnecesnry physi al � hrjjhip . f inconsistent wfV"- he oh ,*coves of the do hill Boulevard Specific Plan ar'd"Developanent Code; gortitit. - f without the Variance, the site could' not, be su'WOded wheehi Parcel 1 Is needod to � protect the ;;H�oric Landdlsr *, China House, , 2. there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condition's a licable to the operty Involved or to the intended'),V.,e of the proper that ; �� r�l does snot, apply generally t' other „properties i�: tie same Dis' 'trice; in' that the site contas c Hi;�t is Landmark and reGnci -res sensitivity }rose a6#e - i,'�G re development around it; h' r t N0 �-t SIOh� FrAFFF REPORT r - ARIANCE 884 `­ CUCAWHGA , "011NTY MATER AI April 27, bm" Page L Ir _ That strict„ ow i iter�al 1.,&�rp Cation aha enforcement- the sp�ified reguiation xuu"td doprit a the applicant of privildges enjoyed ly -,the ownars of other properties in the SOM district; to that, without, the. yarianco the atpplicant could not subdivide the �3i io4 4. that the granting of the Vari'nCa WAIla not CClstit:tte _ _ grant of swial privtleg. irKons Cant, With..Othe J limitations on other proporttgs laisi ltd #t► the District,, ie that; . a' stir cts withihAbe b _Ta:k be�ren the 8ernargino a+idxidblt,of a"a Read and iC13� an a'.-e non- confoming 4iV, under S agesx.,, AnI A4 of thqq lots landlccked, `the ., are where Foothill, Soweval% 5'pe0fic Plan encourage lqt consolidation for_;maxiwA development potential. 5., ihatr a granting �Of , the Var-Ian6e_ -wilt" not be detrffioli to to ba publ is health, safjj_y welfare,, or -. F" "U.. inju,!ioa to paper ie or= itprovoe s.in the wonjty; r The appiicarit "Lus submitted' a 'letter praviding :,ertifioation for t`te Variance ; rsquest (sae attached), f i_ IV. COFREg- :�lu�ttCE: Thi;t 'Clem has beer .adr��`'� �«sd in 'ate DaO :, Re port .= newspaper as a hearing, ^tied, public the pr6,,A ,:y a' ni were.'sent •to .*. property within Soo owners ,: of the pro,4,ect V. BECONMENOATION: - St ii f recoaanonds that, ` ie `PT'arul'Ag Commission approve at' a ce 88-0I and lssuanc.e of �; Xegatjvt Declaration. a , Res 'frslly City P Roar �aC.NFzt Attach rents - Letter from Applicant PIVviding Justificatti Or Va�,�nce �� y ,. I:achibi't "AK LnCtfonp cbi + `Vi °T- OynceiPtual Master Plan R+� 3d��t scion �li � y t-� - -- �'t"�ro�ta � •� K, 0701 -02 0 4- 27-88 PC Agenda 3. of 5 c CCJCAMOhCaA COUNTY Y3ATl E PS!ts*jG7 .935 Nt`cd3tt/iEtA3FtCr l49R{T..• iCVCAMONCFA. CAk2a. 9/739 = pity o tt;snc�x� Cstcaonga' 4% Planni s Depart�let�t,r ' ? FROH Jamey 8- C1ihe, Jr. ) , kngineiiing Department Supervisor:",, RATE: J�nuary" ll, 11988 SaB•S paroel tiap flo 11044 for f variance front `Mi=Iiin sat sire 'The property owner is.desirous of obtaihjna; a Parcel reap an the 'Bubject property for purposes of selling that portion of ,property that the property owner,has determined to`k)* surplus to tIeir future need . The proposed parcel split will se�ai ate ou!b for fry €u use that ?r a portion oft property that contains a designated+3atwoicrx site. This will a?'low tbe `property► owner better Ilel'ibix:�g4� in the future, when hatld ng" this piece cf property, Although the' parcel map will be creating lots Ai fa goryr the 'burp U47`tfian de- signated for this `land use catelus 1 rented' is as lat 4e, if not larger, thatt _some,, existing lot s4 .4t ak.,Sui-erea 3 of the Foothill aodleVatd Specific plan. 14I40, by 6#taa1#ahing a separate lot, this will allow for ;gre'ater.fl,sxibility in, deter- mining future use end.com Atibilitf with similar lots directly . to the west that either have or Will have the same development requirements, 1X, �=; rte„ -ts,'" y�' -•:' s �-� il + '+^-- :..> . - z e$ iG �a'.� .� � {� .1 w. r e....r ,. w• � l 1 A p��gy�a ��.. qy i' YiVwweMlEw.uAd�il�i_d �y - �a• Itr WAT= S haa4 • tUt *AW ��wyyNO mimcwr"�*Olie zi TO. Zity of Rancho ,ucamo".nga �t Planning Department FROM: James a. Cline, Jr., , Engineering. Department '^upervisor -° n DATE: January ll, ,1988 SUBJECT-. Parcel Map Ito.; - Master plan Requir; ,Rent The Cucamonga County Water District, ats applicant of the above zefk�z*enced parcel map, has performed some research into the �pre- liminary site master plan as.subW,,tted by Dal a Architects �.Iod finds that the only vacant area nQ ? covklied by the site plaru'arei. the three parcels of lard between Klusman Avenue and the Dalmau k site plan. .These ,;three parcels, one of which is "'%Oarrette's property, were left out of {the,. site master plan because these x easterly three parcels csu,d :het be effectively incorporated -into the 22 acre master plan becw..We of their location with respect to !; other properties, I The District -agrees with that ;philoidphy and believes` the proposed access roads incarpe4rated in the Dalmau sire plan will r' be sufficient to serve the area. A weoterly extension of Estacia f from Flusman would seriously 8ffect the three. - properties im- L, mediately west of Klusman, would create an awkirar appearance along the south side of Etst( liar beca4u:.;> of tale -existing businesses that front Foothill So4levard and would impact the existing parking lot of the bank acrd /or create an undesirable offset intersection, Furthermore, if Estacia were to be connected to the master planned site to the west, the traffic flow generated would severely impact existing Estacia and xlusmatn Avenues, as-they are narrow streets designed strictly, for local residental use. The two properties to the west of the Navarrette property are currently being utilized For purposes other than resAdential and those uses do not require -any additional. access requtmentsp The only problem thait may occur in the future would hia. sto$.;M water runoff and the_nistrict would have no problem prbvi4ing an easement along the' south side cif Para4l 2 folr that ptirpose, In conclusion, the District feels that.. . the m29ster plan reiuire- ment should not be applicable bec&use df—the above referenced , concerns and `th4t this parcel map subnw- be conditioned based'' upon itself 6V,1 -'the two parcels to the west, rl f' RES'AMON -NO. A RESOLUTION QFrTHE RANCHO CUCAMONGA °PLANNING CMISSION c APPROVINti 1ARIANCE NO. 88-01 TO REDUCE THE MINIMUtd Lo SIZE OF :5 AC.�F` �0 0.29 ACRES OF LAND FOR PARCEL 1 AND , 0,89 ACR �3 0 i ft FOR PARCEL 2 LOCATED AT THE W �IsWEST R GQRNCR � KLUSMAN AVENUE AND SAN BEk �ROINO IN THE MIXED USE DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEdAkb SPECIFIC PLAN - kl!K: 208 151 -2 A. Necfitials. ��, Cy�camonia Cdunty_ Water District has filed an application, for the issuance of the Variance Ho. 88-..t l as described in i:he; tide of this Resoib�tion. Heratnafter in this Resolution, the subject Nsrithce retest is referred to as "toe application" (iii %Apr" ;27, 1988, the Planning COWAISsi li of the< -41ty of . Rancho Cucamonga IQnductedd a dull, noticed .public hearing are the application and concluded sa'10 hearing on that date, f1ii) All regale prerequisites to the adoption of this Resafl#wiion nave occurred._ f g. Resolution. AMk NGr TH�ItEFORE, it is herebI found, determined and resolved by the Planning Ccmissipn of the City of ancho Cucamonga as folToies: 1. This Commission herebt' specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recita'rss Part 91, o`�this Resolution are true.and correct. 2. Used upon; substantial 'evT o presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on April 27, 1988, including 1 written and ort'l staff reports, together with public testimony$ ;this Commission hereby specifically finds a follows:_ ca southwest cornet' of Klhusman A Avenue and ppSan Bernardino Road wth located a street frontage of 154 (feet and lot depth of 320 feet and is presently impr.,aved with a single family: home - the Chie House which is - designated as Historic Landmark: and (ail The property to the north. of the subject site• is single family` homes, t, a property to the south consists is:Vineyard National Bank, the property tn.the east is Cucamonga County Water District and single family homes, and the •property to the west is preschools and single fami,?y`h+ls, Vic? The creation of 1arcel'I is necessary to,,.protect the Chi>� House,,.a Histor;,`ic Landmark; and PLANNING COMISSIOt: RESOLUTION NO. VARIANCE 88 -tit - Ct11CAMON$A COUNTY WATER DIST. April 27, 198$ Page 2 (d) '` The- 'is unique as It contains a +iistor'Ic Landmark whewc sensitivity from future ddvelopment around it is required; and (e)` The °creation of Parcel 2 would allow for potential lot consolidation and facilitate east -west access for mazimi ;ing 'Future development:as enc(luraged by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.; 3., Based upon the substantial evidence presented to thi's Comission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specificl findings, of facts set -forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this ComalrissJon hereby hinds and concludes as folIoils, (a) That strict or literal interpretation ' a0li enforcement of the - specified regulation would result,) in ,practical difficulty or unnecessary physicalf hardship incanwistegt with the objectives of. the Foothill Boulevarr`d Specific Plan and the Dedela*ft Code..' (b) That; there are not exceptional or extraordinary/ circumstances or conditions applicable to thie property involved or to the 3ntendef'i use of the pro$lerty that do riot apply generally to rtheir pro�)erties in the saq!e district. (c) That strict ar literal interpretation and enf -cement of the specified regulation would nag' deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district, ' (d; That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent ` with the limitations on other properties classified' in the same district. t (e) That the granting of the Variance fill not be I detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in t'be vicinity, 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3- above, this Co mission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. (1) The approval of Variance 8 -0 Pp n $ 1 is va,nd with the approval of Parcel Map 11044, 5. The Deputy Secretary 'to this Commission shall certify, t:o� the adoption of this Resolution. - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C�,Icn ar4 a GATE: April 27, 1988 �z^ 19" TO: Chairman and Vambers of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad 001er, City ,Planner, BY: Scott Murphy,,Associate Planner, SUBJECT; ENV104M. FRL_ AS SESSMENTM TENt''ATIVE TRACT 13642 - WRELL w Are-st-dential- stun ae; es gn review or • ng a s family, lots on S. acres of land i;l f 7 he Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per: acre), I located on the east side of Ber71 Stroett South;tof loth l Street APM.6 2g2- 0,41 -15. i j I. PR(IECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: L- , A. Action Requested: Apj^x�,at of °tbe subdivislan m&p,'site ,p-Aq, c ncep at gra ng plan, b0lding411evations, and J( suance of a NegatWe Declaration.- Aft B. Project Density: 3.8 dwelling ,funits, per- acre. C Surroundin_g.,Land Use and Zonfn s North- �aca nnt-' 07w s� (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single Family. Residential, Law Residential (2 -4' "dwelling units per acre) East -, Single ;family Residential; Lox Restdar,_iai= (2 -4;, dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant and Single Family ResidWtfal, Loan- Medium Res ential (44•dwelling units per acre) ,� .. Generals Pi e. ✓,l tksi g nations o ec - ow iWq .en ial (2 -4 dwelling unfits peir acre) North =Y' Ursa Residential 12 -4 dwelling :units per acre) South - Low Residential '(2.4 dwelling units per acre) t� East - Low Residential (Z-4' dwelling units per, 'acr�,,:1v West Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling_units.gWr acre) E. bite Characteristics: The: site is currently developed with a s ng a am y residence and relate! structures. The property slopes roughly 2 to 3 percent from northwas to southeast: o F T Ltr - t, � 14 { PLANNIN I alQt STAG REPORT TEIdTATI [TRX'T 13642 - WORRELL �y �1 r I� \ ii II k r` A. Cknerals The applicant is proposing -to d slop 19 iOtS ranging, ze"''ircre ;20Q'squmra feet to 13,740 square feet in area! 1 Tfto �vera1e lot size Within the subdivision `hill be' 9,026 sllrare feet in f area. ;Th 4xisting fi hgle family, r sidennce w"Ill be retained, as parr-' f the subdivision. In con unction with the tract map, the 40plicant'is proposing one singly stony f'l`oor plan and two tyro -story *1oor..plans. Lb floor plarl will ht�ve' three el � tions. 'isle 'snits ranV in Side from l;a9?3 \ square feet t .178 square feet in area. B. 1 hnical_ - -Review Committee. ` iachriical Review - - 5 .CoNi6ite� tiY a or g na Propose o�l.Noveaber 3, 1981. At that tho design of the subdivision provided for i0a extensiain of I -inel avenue to 'ate north. t:rtct boULndary wi @re. � stcn� s _ htAi was t� ? be prorride+3 in "Vi aim this proposal, e ' %chr�ical Rev,7�+w Committee did not approve. the design dac `t —1- f ' tFe kceSsive le►`ggth. of, SPinsl Avenue lwithout -a second means of v access. Therefore, Uii+ echnical required the applicant % obtaia an emergency &tress e4semeni fret they% properly Winer to m rrnrth or to redesign the Sitete prrbYir%� ; c _ a street conne.tion,t :BerylaStreit. Suisse eently, the �ficaot redosigeed the' subdivision to proof% a knuckle on Spinel Avenge wxtfi a street connection out to Beryl.Stteet. C. Desi to ev ew Coiiitteei The Design Review C rtttee tfleerick, —re-YT&ed o acv, o amen.. the original sub.Oi4islon design on Novo er" , 1�r�); ,acrd rec nded approver, subject to the., following condition,; ; 1. t41 drive approach o-r tot 19 should be li i'zed to 22; feet in width. 2. The driveway on lot %9 _should 'b€ limited to 12 feet; in width for the first 35', jleet of the lot. 3. Greater variation should be provided �n the front setbacks Of the units along Beryl. i 4. Greater variations should be .provided In the use of brick and stone on the bui oIng facades« j * « 4 V .j3I 1 PLANNING COWSSIOU STAFF REPORT -r 13642 TENTATIVE Tw NORRELL Page The grading Of the tract should be revised to reduce the height of the, retaining wall,!, along the north and sq;tit boundaries. §Willer retalrdr,% walls could'be incorpo rated into,:�the intetfor lots to, �fnfmize the impact on 71,,the On April 7, 19$aj the Design "Rtview Committee (Emericks Chftiea, Xrout1l) reviewd tho revised subdivision desism;,'�With the extension to Beryl Street and'�ecmmnded approval. D. Enviromental Assessment*. Staff M s completed the Myrow,-ki CHWiW—and fo.s.44nd no signtficant adverse envirOnMeO'Cil ImPacts as a result of the project, If the Planning CONMssiOA Concurs, with these findings, issuance of 4 ative Declaration would be appropriate if tht Tentative Tract Map is approved. III. FACTS FOP. FINDI te ?*M.- The project- Is, consistent wit11V')thq General F14q and- the Devel ' opment Code. ThO PMfect, with the added m1tigation measures. will not be detrimental to Me public health or safety, or cause,nuisances or signIficant adverse enviranift ntal Impacts. In AMV�n$ theIrproposed 'Oso and site plan, together with the rf�cmaended Conditions of Approval, are, in compliance with thc�-, applicable provisions of the Development Code and City S tandards. 1�1 CORRESPONDENCt:: This,item'has beer, alvertised in The Dail R public hearIn th IV 0" newspaper as 4 e proporty posted, anNHOT %M—� have been sent to all property Owners within 300'feet- of"the site. V. �RECOMEWATIOM: ., taff rwommends that the Planning commission approve Tentativ6A Tract 13642 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions and Issue a Negative Declaration. Res, 11 1 ted, C City ity anner BB:SM.Js Attachments: Exhibit "A"-. Site Utilization f4ap Exhibit "V - Subdivision map Exhibit "C" - SIte/Grading Plan Exhibit 'D" - Building Elevations �ReSolution, of Approval with Conditions .ter AWIA v low SITIMIS ovi 11 ONO i", \ tF xexlYt � � m CITY EXHI T 3V�4 �� •w iS's� 4•J be a�9�1c��IV.�a Zn:'.1 �) � 'o ;til [, �tti� � , 4a r Fr '� � '^�.+'R!' +3 X11 � .*� +�e^a•. M _, r � ` � � ,i� •t `` — !a rr tint 3t �(��y,,_._\ k 1 t pniaa^ {•�'y' '�py� ��� S '�i�, 4 •'. ' � � �i ' � 39d - . .r•,r � .., � �, L' : �„ . w 4 .- w„'yt.- .°yam '� �� w' i 133�3LS.� ^.�...- ',� -�,,,- �.+K _��._.Y�. c :g k �'�•°�w: 7IC14'�'� r^ AOL IL JWL t ` ITY OF RANCHD �g Y A TJTi E SCALL J-5 F }J� • 1p X11: T4 - Ti IHI � ••�;�,- � ' 'YEA'„` ,�.,, � -rs�� Y r, r y z X ♦ � a • { ?pG'{Y t IiM !Y!lt � ;ii1,6 1 '{ f r � mm T li OR CITYOF TSM', c_ r. r ter � n -- _ ..�� ..._ W7 ..f� �.1 t S e 1 f t CITY OF RANCHO CUi� PLANNING Dj�,MU%#- TITi.E'.;�' EXHINT. RALL. `� ^>> t3 , f a L f , t i JET3 fY ! __11f ti ANC . N/b Ti I - f° PLANNING aN1 SCALL- = y Y ETA � t i i f i ti MMJ IL CITY CF Cr ram TM PLANNING Dj�,SM ITI LE: _ 4ZL&W E!CHIBIT - 4 ' \� ,.h• +� —.... — � sir. T f # i j[ E. CITY OF ITEM, PLANNINC $'SS+; EXHtINT -.. 11 0 ` A RFS UTION OF Tt;E PLANNING COMISSIAN OF THE CITY OF RAMC; QO CUCMOH6A APPRO�'M TENTATIVE MtT MAP NO, 13642 A 'RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AW ESIM REWIEV OF' 19 SINGLE, - FA14ILY LOTS 06t 5 ACRES OF LAW IN 4K LOW RESIDENTIA" t DIaSTRicr ,(2 -4 I�d`ELLINo UNITS PER ,ACRE}, LOCATED ON ME- f EAST ` SIDE OF SERYL - STIRM, SOUTH OF `STRE' C - APR: 202- 041 -IS. d. Recitals. (i) Petor Nora'rl has filed an application fol. the approval of Tentative Tract t+iup Mcr. 1$542 45 do scPIW in the title oy this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subJeCt Ta"UM4w. Tract Nttp :'request is referred to as Nth6applfcationa ti) DO the 27th of April, 19811, Planning CoeaZissi+ari of the -__ gg City of Rancho Cucamonn a condected a derly noticed -oyblic hcari =vii the application and concluded said hear3n4 on,that date. (fit) Ill legal prerequisites to have occurred, the adoption of this;FiesolOtion B. Resolution. - NOW THEREFORE, is is hereby found, dptai�xr.p_d aid resolved by the Planning Co isaion of the C,�tytiof Rancho Cucamaingb as foil: ! This CoWssion hereby specifrically i'i ds thZIt-411 of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of Nis R�r1,e1ution are true and correct. 2. Based upon sdcalntial fire den resented to this &osisstan during the above- referenced public „hearfnj on ��ppriT 27: 19SA including written and oral staff reports, togetheW with public t�estfmogq, this Co�nission tierPby 'a specifically finds as follows: (a) The app' €ication applies to prepe'rty located cat tie' east side of Beryl Street, sauth of 19th Street.with -'a street frontage of 330 feet and a depth of 660 feet and is presently develo residence; and ped with a single family (b) The property to the <south, eest,.and West is designated; for residential uses and is developed with single family hoes. The°'aAertl+ to the north is designated residential uses S,presorrtlY 1 ,for acrd vacant; avid j (c) The project, with the recommende,S tonditfons of approval, complies with all minimum development staKq %rds ,of the Cityaf Rancho { Cucamonga; and y� -� i PLANNING MISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TMCT 13542 - NORRELL April 27, 1988 ) �xqe 2 (d) Tho development of 19 single family 'rots 06, 5 acres of, land is corsistent with the Lori Residential land use designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comission during the above - referenced public heetting and upon th+a specific findit$3 of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as faliowat (a) That tentative te&6: is consistent with they; Ger041 Plat,. DeveloWent Cade, and specify (b) ' The design or improvewts of the tentative tract is consistentZ with the" General: Flan, Developeent'Code, and specific p`yans; and (c) The site is phi sically suitable fmo. the hype of develownt proposed; rind ! (d) The dtzign "of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environtal damage and avo..3able injuq. to humans and wildlife or their, habitat; wind (e) The tentative ;art is no' t likely to cause serious public health peoble*s; and (f) The design of the t Mtativ, `tract will not l conflict with any easeefent acquired by the Public ar Merge, now of _.record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4, This :omission hereby finds and certifies that the projtct has beeer'�reviewed and consider-.d in compliance with the California Environmental r QuaTriy Act of 1970 one ;, further, this Commissfn hereby issues a 4e9ative Declaration. S. Based upon the and conclusions set forte, in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this ComissiN hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth belort alhd in the attached 7,tandTTd Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference�i Tract Flap (1) A: drafrige swale and flood wall, shall be constructed along_, o t P to , recta offsite floras the north roject�' baun ary B_r l /Hellman drains a channel to thk -least as apprpved' Jby �reEe c wilding Official and Ci+,y Engineer, tx.�t #ry ove -heady utilit es (telec nitcAions=_'4nd e'lectrica�l} on the-- ect si a of bery�treet shaltc, be_ ° ' undergrlpuRled frorl the Virst pone off - ,ite south of the J `.r 'T t PLANNINS COMMISSION RESOLUTIOWNGte" •z' "' TENTATIVE TRACT 13642 = NORRELL April 27 1988 project boundary to the first pole off -site north of .,e ncrtN pr'"', ct. boundary prior to public improvement aced'eptani�e or octiupar,.t, whichever occurfrJirst. The Developer may request a reixburssarent agreement _to recover `onejhalf the City adopted �4` cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite -side ° of the street. Undergronding shall include any service lines ,hich cross Beryl Street. Design Review (1) The drive apprwch on Lot 19 shall be ►invited to 12 feet in width.. (2) The "driveways on Let 19 shall be limited toll feet in width for the first 35 feet of the. lot. (3) Greater variation in the use of brick ar4 stone shy be provided on the building facades. Tie revised plena revived and approved by the, ;Cli Planner`P jor to nce of building permits. (4) Decorative block walls shalt be provided on all corner side yards. The design and location of the walls shall be shown on the final landscape 'Glans which are subject to review- and approval by the City Planner prior (to thr..issuance of building permits. 6. The Deputy Secretary to th°;s Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DATOFAPRIL 10,88. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhJDM BY: �d T-0,14cNiel, Chairman `F. ATTEST: ara ,Suljer, Deputty SecreUry I, grad BulUr, Deputy Secretary of th'e Planning ConNission of the City of Rancho Cucamon ®x,, do,hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly ,httAiuced, passed, and adopted. by the Planning Commission or the n City of Rancho Cucamonga,.:at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission. a Id on the 27th day of April 1988 by the following vote- to.Wit: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: - !wIESt COMMISSIONERS: 1 r' ASSENT; Q iIS 10NEk5: O .... iie •••_NLq�sg[ �aa ^`FaL a b�iD psyY "w . _ d141p �• 4� "' �C� q�i ��w15iT —0.2 if ,.g.. ai, rra sal e6w 5N Y r W —119 P FIR will s�d IL 2 qi m IIIL-� m: itl�6 N 6 A' « 7 Y N n �C.YO 1 Y«wY M N q V G yau.^ jA¢ !••. �. 1q �• 1 if _ V wr p� e` � "i.• � O i �ra It � 1 �. � � Y i Y •lip I�si ��.' M �, ..{ • f r d�\ �7 t7 R '•jyj rN It 'A w n� —r I rr Orlat 1LN2p1 9«Z -. �A L «. tl t• � a4- O W 4 tl 7f W� 3� }[ @� if @MAN W y F 8,_� -R L.1 CY.Ii �� Nq Ell JS X16 r • W ^ L y 07 • •e• N � N 4 . St IC gam~ Fs. -wee $_5if° tgP x A�Or •� �Y_! �xW sW. y rt fd�.Y « ,M e.Rel� yy .. iY V6 at jo Y 1'a To EvIi 9gg Ge wig$ KsQ'.,.i AL.N� Nlpgq p.J i� aM -4a 77 L 8Y X41 gip& lrs 4. ��91� w?Evi- o_$ _ _ e'b} ggyy~W LpW %_ -. a NKNY p eN, I 4 r'0Y.D A g �^i.7S j{8p�6 �. tom« 2,Vy�SyN ox-2,; +O d!i W C YI9 _ y !s yy == e _ L� i {Y O N Y •r NZ— 1-M IN, �D. Gp yqi peV W3 .CL `Y LL1pN. QI �'t.'T�$�OgY i� Wp�N NrL W 1���i Y (1 4O .OYy 1f/°^�wY G611.!OW C lu qi MM1 VH.'Qr # O+D C« V 6q 64N GG ypc� g 'tl yy++i. y4y ppO,l 1ygbO �Q�X�Ot aI. OI iL C�� C. "N G1Y {1c WL L:�•C.4y• J` GR4i 99'aa .�.N h�f�NO < N.0 1A< C J.�4GL4q� 11r j. ..'1�.bY :Ca mVc.__ ?C� Vy .� KGf,, original K $ �1 Qy{��,, 6PM G• ge °AV ®wq 6..� ^YY�°1.�YQY4 w p�Tti (oi V�gyp ..e �p. bM yq V�••44.q �~aNsq �y. (•,pG i Cu ~q � �j tl�Nq � �Yw ��i J. ���O �Y N�IS NY $ ¢ � ii �.e.N �y.• y 4 •X M:II O q = iii = IFLi yMpVw �L Vy YS �` -..-mod C°';q Yip • _N y. %ggNU � 1- 0 g4CH .1 � �y�t ^py}�' ".a� `rj�'ri r"°''� �a�i �� L `j�°G�wn►;a ca. ®p$lj �,'� g ��a _ tu 1 } 41 Q$R a�Nl' AL K�w2 UYm K Nny+ Y.M SiR9 IN '�i'N NE igtN.RL� ..fig' u LOA T1 ry ky ['�� s.". � .Q °•i } y i4i ' ,�yK. y S _yg N b � °r it / ��b1Y a°� 's 2 is y MV M L s` �y vY QO y,�, i~. ragG p N 31, i. dye iYi9 6"2: y 11�0 g 5 ►..+D iC_e Qy l- q�wal{J1Eb� J ,a 42 1• yiS -02% q1 I ^C q4 N� > •C y ~_~ y.. ,� V N /,q Q e y Y � gC.oLiR� CCC �[ r C .( G. 9 L7V +tstH.r� A.�y itOY r�.. 'L. LL VB - r.rysG y'Y -Qi 40~ °Jaw HJ <V � Q'q^° 7 A4� C ivrt �1 _ W4 Ell • tt h `� � �. � �+ �l ti eq. •i yi .Q 7 • N ' ..G sF.V: �� ary e�� r 1aoea 2132 `o ip4l JF�ggr.,. Aa it ttb Rp fill ­ 718 Q -i W i JU Nil fie- JUE Rim v"v 1p V lilt q � • eM� '�rf � �� ML� Y �Y M� q .ZZ u T M "`,1 �jy L +^fc�as �CNqy,�u� o:� V�pj 5h �N V L 4 VN «a �Va :, �iM M ■ NNNE , 2 ii 1— y +�0'O N OO lgSi 5 LMY y P �N'61w ryK. -for ,.. L4 MIG Oyyyyy l N r S_ LT 4■ G L L' q .'S 4 ' S^ !'�,: :» N z'. y &Sy c+ -i�u 7 tye�o r L e466 ��"r"..+a 7 N�CG V Y S P walf^ � �CC ."off O N■n �?- MG S�r N�y.4C. kn w'' yC L ~ S'A Z. �t -♦'sr: M `t�'9^. ��CM 664 A� �Ya �p � 3�.9 W Y i�wr� _ ♦.rS agi�q ytl1 O uwRa �LOt d ~ C 9r� 7C a� Y6y 6N �1 Lss Y bq y{l� rpp�,��Y +AA UCH ti4 -4�0. OMMq Hat, �_ y R^ Guwe a I 3 y� rc Ss. w O 7 r1w a .. a `�$ s •� Via` ` �� � � � � l � Oal fa 42 TB u It CL i M w Y•SA M M�p�Si �l A 'Y �1 � b r eY .l:ily�Alr d ++•• �gi U ') Ib si 6 Q � 9 i t - -� ^ - j 31 l. III «. t i $ i � r -r: Y gall, kit a Cl! r 1 W as L 6s �i Y li _ ypa� gg Ift { �L'y pia Y Y�qN b.a .'3 y �ffi4 :��v^�,+ 2. af nii it 'Ea Q v l/ O of ssilt'sa. Aga$ �$py)s Hit r. A�� + pV My�4 .Xg O ll�. Iii �N� p aw • KO � 0�. VF -Y V `N a$ � .� Y® at. r 1p is; - e vfi i'c 4C�v�ye i+awf_g ikigia` A �'r i E i4� a A��,.� .�23`��, era$i 7 r Na Vtl 14 O ` liF 13 i pye'! G YgN�aY °eft. .N• ��T+^ �` r$w r`a ':gw�.a3 ro�.°,us N'^ Lt:c�xR og ` �y VSFaladai« v��.Y�i O r i N � p 777ddd ids V a V �D N �{ O �tl 7S� TL `h'' IT in� g r -g �,�, Z HS, 15 E : _ s o SIC let a it � a ss ; p� mot' � Y °4t '.A • �yi � ��, ����i} V tl. i =a a wa Or Sa U 28:: t-j! 's, I. ¢ �` ;fig 8 '� it i -.2 gIt: NIp W w Il 41� .N tl Y 9 M ,p r y a COO 1101 C.f /� 6jN pA�>!S� Niip� r.. dy. O !t n.`It O C Ll 4 ? C {, �y . 4 ail C. ti`y 4: N4W w... AW. N .� C o P , i+ r Das .4 $ ate. tl y"o DL, 9� u .; yI sppay :. -, bat 'egg �w; Y2K+@ " `otw b`V $u3bj.3♦ as o f NYC: a :� = ;-A f s sit .L, ♦N.r y"���{ °per i�Y • fy� $L • N L q�' s^S�' �. tlyyy'�6, is YY Z1y7� 4 46 - CpS tyf• a. V , i. 4FY a Ya{P�C�.I i i q Y L�YQ ♦L'N HNY� �1[W 6.6 fi `V �G. yV w~ TM _V Yyp _N6 W9.ti• 6Mi..N ppHtQNCq i5��pr Fppp� CIO � 21,198$ e'�S o� t Too w � �larre��arre� �ate o� r� � VN[� SO CA UP 6 °�2� •+� ��i. �' 4hre� 221 gJ��EG'� • '§' W+Wc, +qZj i �� D Ze��� �Q ` �8"�hgaB er�R�r' of "ate 11r aZ1 • As ° eye a IL�p j�O� pS� �e�� t r �Z.xr r ANo�,�t Nt. t, �tN ` e o 'oe t.a�,�e�e _ ta� tea ;�o e� �aeCe � tv-16 pt a r No, t q ie a s ' code tce ®A �r9 nor �' S trii�tto ot'`e� �e�r9 �$cre �e ire NOO 1 `5 to�,�a Gtner td r ,��ea 41�t�• s� yes aka �;�t qNt NCO! ref e�e''e DLO' tptG�sJ�otp��lt �G SN�; �e� Qo��a3a�fl�'��'�rj �Aa� ei • atNo ueti ra h ser�C�0# � a���5to� ��� cZ rlac� A' v��l �oerard v r {o9 rA avi �• a��in th _. Oe�e p�e� th ql r �, , l o,�- to Q n. � 2;,0* 9 1W � "ase ea'tp' d to Sa° U. @�� � co and. ocrc� ye*9 re aP #oC v g t b �pqo �� �,����V Ver�2 §the �er�e � ea ell 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Q�10616A STAPP REPORT,,, DATE: April 27, 1980 a � a 1877 TO Chairman and` tubers of the Planning commission ' r FROM: Brad Buller *r,'City ;planner 9Y: Debra Bier, Associate planner SUBJECT: £NVYft0MWAL !IS94ERT VICiORTA PLANNED CCMMCiNIIY - amen n o Annex el4v areas a c ianned.,Co( �+�c� r a inity - APR: 227 0 tt7 ,rib 11 227 - 09104, 45, 4S; 227- #11 -75p X27 - 14 9s: 6, 49, Stun 27 -01-18 through 22,. 25, 43; 227-11r4 lo 33, 38; 227 -'".7I -fig, 2 F- 161 -1D„ 24,E 26; 227- 111 -27, 30; 227-171 -21; 227211 -072 28, 39; 22g -0321- , ,} •I 68; and 227 - 21-1 X03, <a0. T� I. - BAGKGat3tliVE; The sutiet of annexing several parcels 10 and around e c or a: Community was initiated_'by the Planning C0WJSSJonL, during rtvjew of the Vineyards North,-Arta Develo t Plan, ilte Commission ha'a_ i fdAted ; that these parcels should annexed i"to Victoria to ii:xure that development of these parcels was consistent with Victoria Community Phan Standards, 7re',�tent a annexing sae a paroe7s into Victr�ria is that it xd2 e".00ura §e Master Planning, rather, that isolated "developments and `wall r4aintain f consistent des§gn standards. o IT, AfttAl \lam A. teneral: There are a total of eleven areas being considered dr annexation into the ,Vlctnria Cownity Plan. r got � parcel will be discussed individually, considering the :kxiattng Development Distrfct designation, surrounding land` ses and the Proposed land use designattort <within the victoria Community Plan. 1. Vineyards North Planning 4--a (Exhibit "A ") An: 227 - 011.8, 9, 10, 11 General Plan: Low- Medium (44 duiac) rr _ DevelOment 0,,:�$trictf Low- MediUm (4 -8 du /ac} Recommended Victoria Land Ute: Lori- Medium C(4 -8 du /acj Site Acreage: 80 acres this, parcel is currently vacant: bounded to the north by Highland Avenue, to the west by Proposed single 'family !" residential, to the south by Victoria Park Lane_and'to the east by Rochester Avenud and the .Oar C'ree% Basin for,;�an Fr { PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REOGRC' ^ "r VPCA 88 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCARONGA April 27,:988 Page 2 Bernardino County Fltlod Control, The southerly 40 acres - - ,Qf the is 00001 intended for a future high school and is armed by the Chaffey Joigt onion H1,-jh School District. Additfon�i access was provided to this parcel fromc, the Vineyards North Brea along the north,b000dary of the high school site. � o fiae proposed rest altial areas to tie west ak4 south are developed within the Low - Medium range, It)) would be - approp„ste to maintain the similar densities 4.Jtbfn this � parcel with the Low - Medium designatQ1. i 2. Vineyards SoutW Planning Area (Exhibit "A ") APR: -W- 091 -4,, 48, 45 - - General Plan. Medium (8 -14 du /acl Developnoent District: Plediium i,A -14 du /ac) Recomnded Yirtoria Land Use -, '-Medium (8 -14 du/ac) Site Acreage. "t23 acres A small portion of this parcel Is presently the exi�t,ng lumber yards the remainOer of the site is vineyards. The Parcel is bound tb thi: north by the Sourn Pacific Railroad tracks, to the west by Rochester ° ' sue, to the south by Base Line Road and to the east by t 2 corridor and Day Greek F'loo" patol Channel. There is an approved -single family tract—Imme-diately west of Rochester Avenue with_a product type in the Medium zone, with an actual - dens�*,iry of 7.40 dwelling units per acre. The wideveloped parcel north of Vie railroad 'track is also a Medium density, Inaediately south of Base Line Road is the existing Rochester Tract. . This subdivision of single family residences is UW density (9 -4 dwelling units per acre D, These homes. back Plato Base Une°Road, and the tract has no direct access to Ba>d'Line Road, It is appropriate to maintain the Medium density designation on this palcel.as it relates to the surrounding land uses, 3. Windrows4'Planning Area (Exhibit 18 ") APR: 227 - 411: -75 - ° c General. Flan: LW-Medium 1;4 -8 du /ac) Developient Di- trice: Lowi,- Medium (4 -8 du /ac) Recomnerded Victoria Land � Use tow- Medium (4 -8 du /ac or', Low (2 -4 du/ac} \ Site Acreage: t0.9 ages -' , PLANNING CtlNitiissm STAFF REPORT VPCA 88 -Oa\- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 27, 1988 Page 3 f This parcel is the site of the existing ,�isalleti Polka Palace. Surrounding development is Low density residential ject of single fai7y detached The Gardens. (�t th�r time.Of deveicpment a �u7 -de -sac we` s _ built - abut�ing the saut� parcel l��e to allow the Site t�?? eventua7l+ t(esre7 aL+ as a series of flag 1 ots accessinge c;el >de -sac. thelefar it would b4 npPropiate tb designate this parcel as Law density consistent with adjacent development or k� -�iiu[ density► consistent with the existing GengRra7 Plamsignatian. 4. Windrows Planning Area (Exhibit "8m) -APP: 227- 09I -9, 261i 49, 60 - Gengral Plan: Medium (8 -14 du/ac) ee�t n � ow�4 Rco ded District,., Lad Us m (-8 du /ac) ` ? or Medito (0-14 du /act Site Acreage., 07 ac -� This is a currently variant parcel ,bwind to the 'north, by o i Victoria Pau,k Lane, to;. the west by a Southern California ;Edison Corridor, io the th by thg::_ Southern Pacific 'Railroad tracks and to theasty Oaf _reek Boulevard. Within thy, Windrows Village imme( otely east of Oay Creek Boulevard and an Edison Corridor (4)roximately 500' total) yF is an existing single family attached product in the Lots- Medium -, density range. Thy undeveloped parcel north of Victoria Park''Lane is Radium density, while tine undeveloped ` parcel south of the railroad tracks is also currently being considered r annexatWir tc Victoria as either a Medium or te diuq -nigh 'density use (Paktel No. 5). This parcel woule) be appropriately designated either Low= Medium Or Medium Density o A Low - Medium Density designati x; woul'o consistent with the existing developoen past not Day Creek Boulevard and the Edison fi"orridor and is a,0 consis nt with the presed� devt1opment district l( 'designation. A Low - Medium designation -*ould necessitate a -SeneO Plan Amendment, from glum Density. to Low- Nedium Density,, o A 4ediiim Denny designation would be consistent,,with the current General Plan designation. The parcel has adcess t!t'two perimeter streets, Victoria Park Lane and Day Creek Boulevard; which woutjd lend itself to Medium Density,development. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VPCA 88 -07 CITY - =OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 27,, 1988 Dage 4 -} a�. The:. Lakes North Planning Area (Exhibit "C`") k'N: 227491 -18 through 22, 25, 43 i' General. Plan: Medium :4 du /a;;} Oevilor, "nt Wstrict Medium-High (14,�4,dulac) Recoreutnded ldictoria Land Vse: KedW, 13 -14 dulac) or Aedium -High (14 -24 du/ac) " Site Acreage: t�4 acres This parcel presently contains an existing fCre statute on the west portion of'the site. 7here,4s an approved 9 acre apartment project, OR 85 -42, located approximately 660 feet east of the Day Creed Channel, but %r the post park the parcel is still used As a. %eyard.. 'lie zite is bound to j the north by the railroad right ^.���, Js tlst ,tAst by the 00 Creek Channel /Edison worry, to the sodth by Base Line Road and to the east, by Oar Creak ftiIlavafd. .The property immediately ,north of the railroyapd�y� tracks is annexation parcel �qo. s with a recarseniW -1 , of either ' Lair - Medium or± Meditirt and the propperty` nediately south of Base Line Road is an urdeveloped` parcel within the Regionally Related ttfficelCbmarefal dfizig:Sat, *. f the Victoria Plan. This parcel could be approviately designated either 140i.um or Medium-High Dansity o A Medium designation would be consistent with'` \� Present GeneraFVtln designation .af NSediuma, and wo;.,�t also provide a -. -Tamer transition in 4ensity between the Low - Medium densities of Terra Vista and Victoria to the higher densities proposed within ''the Lakes Village. However, the approved project DR 85 -42 has =a proposed density of 18.6 dwelling units per acre which is within the Nedi% -High density range. o A Medium-High - designation would necessitat_- a 4eneral Plan Amendment for consfs�enty. The parcel has ;direct access te"both Base Line load and Day .Creek Boulevard and is In close' proximity_ to proposed cocmrciol development soutn of Base Une. along with the existence of the approvec`, DR 85 -42, a Mkdiu High designation would 81so'oe app` priate. E. The Lakes North Planning Area (Exhibit "G ") APH: 22781!1 -1, 33, 38 General Plo: Medium (8.•4.4 d#ac) r Developmeni District: ftdium (844 duJac) Recommended Victoria Land Ose: Low - Medium (4-8 du /ac) or Wdium i8 -14 dii/ac} Site Acreage: t5 acres +1 y. PLANN196~ OWWISSXGN STAFF AEPORT VPCA 8842 - CI.TY OF 13WOG CUCA14ONGA =' r, April 27, 1988 ' Page � This parcel is presently used for - single family�,residtnces and. as a landscape nuraeryi The site is bound -1 Victoria ' Park Lane on the west, Base Line Road- to thn�south and ; existing ,single famil± residential (The "ht r) to the j nortt Ihd.east. The.; adjacent residences ire the.0 'This parcel "'could be designated eith r LoW-Nedf ux or MW Density. o A Low - Medium designation would be cgg-Isisten` wifh�the existing de!vel,)*!ht.,,adjacent ' i6 thi.�, parcel-01069 the north and east- bdurf6vi -es. 'Phis lei' doe:±, rrresent certain constrai6is `on future dev�opmert,,,due to site size ac "d access. Exhibit tl" shows a p6ssiblA, street ati _ nt whic' coulc acco date .developsrenlr ton Lter- Med:um Density, whlch would be similae ta` density of the adjacent tract. o A Medium, Density d�s�gnation is '�os)s;x ``� w; th �hi: current Develd''pm ent'A strict designations 'Ll'Agaij *� dua,� to size of the site'!, an attaebed product woult� most likely be used to aitta,n density in tjr,a C 2 filling units per acre r -tinge: rim Change in pr'O' of typ lsand dtiensity adjacent to exixtirg single family resid�Pces r :� of {holy create confFtc. 7,. The :tikes P1:~Wng Area (E'xhibit V) APN. 227- 171 -19 General, Alan: Aeighbor.Wod Comm ial Developgtent;Aistrict drum (844 du /ac) Rec. wIlded Vicf, -: ,ia Lan& Use: Medium (8-14 du /ac) Site, Acreage:9 'zeta )lie parcel contains an existing house, and is�sted ion' the south side of Base "Line Road surrounded l,by va' xirt land. The Lakes Planning Area is currently in the eaR14 stages of land use stud>?2s. At this time staff' <� recontrendation is to adopt the current Development bistricil, s!sigUaw i- Medium and allow'this' parcel to be considered;-I,, as,part of the overall Master Planning of The Lakes area. j 8. T+re,Lake9 Plannivi,Area (Exhiblt AC "} APR: 227 - 111 -27, 30 227-161-10,,,24,"25 and' 227 - 171 -21 ;z General Plot; High (24-30 du/at) Development histrl'ct : High (24 - -30 du /ac) ?' 4 Recommended Victoria Land rise: High (24 -30 du /ac) Site Acreage. �, *14 acres ff _ 1v,` PLANNING C,OM tISSICN STAFF REPORT q YFCA 88.02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCNtONSA ; Aril `r7, 1988 Page 6 The westerly portion of this parcel cImtains an old winary facility that is now being used by, th(,iOel Monte Company to produce vinegar. There is also 4P existing.,. residence on the easterly portion of tle site, .1'he parcel is bounded by Base L,,Ipe road to the north ant., it-La thy,,, a surroaiitded by 1,"v'-dn,%1 and. Like parcel no. 7, :this is also related to { The',,, Lakes Planning Area being stu4jed ,1 -, , 5tjff's reco; ndation is to adopt the cdrrent Nigh density oohing designation and.allow this parcel also to be considered as part of the overall Mast3r Man for The Lakes area.. The-Lakes Planq;,ng.Area (Exhibit 9. APTZ' ,227- 211 -1,4 28, 39 (t14 acres) 10, APO ­ 922i�rO21 -58: 5 acres) General Man: Commerci,a,s' Development District: /z�General Comercial Recomended Vlcr ^r�. d Land Use: Regional Related Off =' i.ei" Comn�erciaP i - - These two parcele are presently vacant',landp_ bocaded by Interstate "15 along _the east boundary. Eventual develoP.Got of these parcels will must lo0ically,'�be an extension of the commercial ae, ivity around' the regional center. Therefore the, Regional Related Office /Comrcial' (RR) designation would be appropriate. Ii. r'ne Lakes Planning Area (Exhibit "C ") - APN: 27 211 -3,.30 General Plan:;,; Regional Come«cial aevelopsr4hr Mstrict: General Comnercial­�'. Recowse&ided Victoria Land Use: Regional. Center Site Acreage.' i4 acres This parcel -is presently vacant land bou6ihed by interstate 15 to the east. This property is actually a pjrt of tie " Regional Center site plan,_ - therefore the Regional Center (RC). designat.ionjs most approprfate. B. Environmental &sessment: Staff has ' completed the Fnvi ronflen-ta-T eMlst, and has found no +_<tgnificant ` environmental impacts related to annexing .these parcels into, the Victoria Cm. unity Plan. _ I1=. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order foi- the Planning Commission to > recommend appro'WaT o the annexations for these'dlevcn parcels into the Victoria Planned Community the following ` Wii'gs be mutt made: A. Provide for the .development of a comprehensively planned Urban � cq€�wpity with' District that is superyor-�to development otherwise a� �r=re under ernate regulations. " O I A RES0L0Ti"Oh.CF pe RANCHO WC-410 MA PLANNING COMIaSION RECl 't INd APPROVAL: DP VICTORIA PLIANNE0 CC*WNITY AME"ENT 0a' AN A"E iENT 'i'O ANNEX Et,EVEN (JI)L ARMS ti�f�t'y��i�:�spk 7TW VICCTORIA�y�yCO[�# NNITYy �AR�FA� pTOT 1'i'!}E �VyICi'1O91A rr PLANNED COWNZI *' ►53'A LQ7'aV i,"fJiT iP'isr.3FVFi i�' G4 •V '�' n O4, 4$, �2- 227 - 411 -75; 997 - 091 -09, �fii, �9, S ; 227 -�}91. tL3 '!` ROUGH 22, 25, X48; 227411-01, 33, 38; z27Ti7�- 1p 191 227- 161 -10_ 24, 25; 227- 111 -2Ty 3Qa 227.,171 -�21; 910 211 -7, 28# 5�; RZ9�A21 -5R; g ' 227- 211_,1, 30 blHEREAS ur the 27th ,day 'of April, 198fI , the Planning Commission held at duly advertised p>dblic hearing persuaftt �o S'ection 658% of the california Gover" ant Dade. fol1cwft97fTnW ring—S.- SECTION 1s 'lire rancho cucmronga Planting r€xsort has *tde the 1. That the hemleent will provide 4dr evela nt of a comprehensively planned Orben t.omunity taithitr the District that is superior to cleyelc nt other #te allawAbli under alternate reputations; and s ' That the ertdment will prqfode fir' devei �t Within tie District In a 1"nnfsr consistent wi� e Ceneral Plan and with related devaTopeent and gr tlr maanasm"t policies o � :e Clio -, and 3. fihat , »he Aeen*wt will provide 'for 00 construction, r in�prAVement' or, mriension of 4� transportation -- facilities, ,public utilities,: and apc+ is services required bj develops ft with the District.. SECTION 2s The Rancho, Cucamnga P3ents.ng �i lion has found that this prt� ec - w Tl" not create a signi ficarit adverse jmpc. ;t on the environ*nt- and re;otmends, issuance of a Negative Declaration on April 27, 1988, I> THEREPOREs BE IT RE SO ,. 1. That pursuant to . SectiorrF- +S6$5U to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Cs ission Of the City of Rancho Cucamnga Hereby recommends njpeoial of ys'ctoria Planned Wmunity Anendment 88 42. 2. The Planning CoMtssion lsrehy recomeends that the MY Council 'Approve and adopt. Victoria 'Planned rnn Counity Amendment No. 88 «q2 to modify the COmun ty PlaT'per, Exhibits "A% V, and i*rCrr 3y .„ ��. � � �.;' +. m � z`� I +� t OMT a R a IJ I to 14P 41 fTF t ti EXHIBd'i=. S \AGE L, E, �carryr.x - -- i. --- — CIx ECHO CxjCA ONGA ..,c�r�,ti OF rU ' onm ? O •^ t \ v V � 1977 � DATEt. April 27, 1988 Tot Chair=" and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller. City P`taner Debra Meier► Asl'a4te 'Planner BY. �,DY Et"1EIE1il SUBJECT: kj j &' WE1il'AL ASSESSMENT A10 DEVEI..rr�ENT n c aange eye Armen s r c efrgna ons as they currently exist, y Victoria planned Ccnity tV,p,C.) far eleven areas the Victoria planrie�! Commdn�i't�Y APM: `7 -011 08 withiD 46 46. 227 - 411 -76, 227 =01 -09, 26, through iii 227- 091.0P1. s 43, 227�-111� -01, 38„ 38. 227 - 091 -18 thr& ,h 22, 2 9 3, a 227 - 17141, 49, 5D, 227- 111 -27, 227- 171 -i9; 227 - "61x229- 21.58; and 227- 211 -08, (, 227- 211 -07, 28'� 3ft 1; RELATED FILE. VICTORIA PU Ctk NlNil`{ E '° "`' 88-82 This is an aaainistra -,ive actio,,1 necessitated by I, ABSTRACT: Iendment $6.02 whieh is intended: to c or�a planned Casmunity. annex. 11 .aut paw within the victoria area into the planned C Canv�unity. Conse 4nt ;Y a Cr. .1lopmeDt District designations as t th�Y current exist, see Exhlbitx. A ". would change to Victoria Planned Con�nunity tY,p.C. Exhibit d 1. o Victoria Planned' Community Pa related a 8 Y ?, EItVIROIMENTAL ASSESSMEPTt Staff has completed the Ena0`Wntal to c s w ti respe# 02 and found no significant environment?') impacts annexing eleven parcels into the Victoria Cxm =nit, Flan, III, FACTS FOR FINDIF1GSt Upon of a that ethis P aFosal the a amen n e enn rg G consistent with the objectives of �e Development Code, properties General plan, and will }got be detr' al to- ad3aining g p �r ali�� nearing IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item irs been advert.is sp- n e a e " of o!' yea h parcel ob¢ g nti�dera�C; to $roPerty `owners w ra 1 t IIEM L Imp=. d _ SW STAFF EpQRi�. 4! DDA 88,02 OF R ii, d4E b OHGA Aprils�l �._ ` IY. RECONERVATION1.4; Staff moxcnds that the Planri reeoram�e approvaN of fleeelaien gigxip�y ., l3ixtri. 4�G t 88-1) fi the > ;' City Council by adoption of the aiLitacbed Aesolution. Res filly, it H d . , er r, 1 pcf, %J13ni At4ac gents: Exhibit "A" ExIstIng b#Vela Wt 014stri t t1 Igignations - �xhlIM, '"ii'" , f = -, R Sod Victoria Pl4nned Ct} anity Boundary Chi s , ` tesaiutio Ric ing J pomat Cj U ' Ceti w �l::: ' )@YBIWUNITY EXHIW 6`:' :B — _# Hma Avenue 00-0 *soon l , SFRR , lu C. f V.P.C.s ase I any PC M' l l e r Avenue -� , U t fi t G! C R Both i l l Bou i eva: d UA � iPMENT DISTRICT MAP OEPICT ENO' THE OU OiN THE VI(70P.1 PLANNED COMMUNI ' Opp -. o L toW tl :, _ C J j uO A RESOLUTI6lt 00' THE RFlCHCi CUCAkHRiG1S PLAyiili{G COMMISSION V Rf Z °E�,1M OPROVAL OF REVElE '"ElET `DISiRiCT A�IEPiDMEh 1f :. 1dd3e r8 , A , REQUEST TO C. � DEVELOPMENT DISTIUCT iESlial T Oil " -1 THEY .ORREN`1'LY" EXIST. ` 0 VICTORIA P,l' MED i ` CONPA;lEfW iVP? FQR' ELEVEN AR WITHIN" 6!iE "VICTORIA PUNNED CONhlUtI APM: 227G11I,aJ THROLW 11; . 227 091- Oe3,`+ ? 227- 411x'75; •22;7 - 091 -00: - „26- 45, SAY � r; 2 7 -I8 THRO k` 22, ,55, a3I 227 - 111 -01, 33, 38; f'-27 -� Ian' -19; 227 - 161 -10, 24, 25,R27111�2 ?,° 30 22iwi71 21� 227- 211 -07, 28; 39,29RO2P -59D AM 2- 21 -Q3, 30 IJ ' WHERMS;; on'`'the 27th day° t5f April, I588, n t��yP $ fion was ,fi7di and r accapted on the abovo- dlescrib,_%& Ordect and WHERMA i od of 21 .$h iay "qf A ril 1988 the Planni�n Coews4ssion hold ,.. a a!iy advertised` putt` ”' r�Mng; pars fin _ tca Sectitxi 65854 of the California 1 ;Covd nt Code. . ' j 'C, SECTIOLI" 1: �n� `Eta"Cho Ciro iga .Planning CCAissirsn has madt ,the fol l owi arginii „ T"At thi, sub3ect prop$rtl#� f5 "sUIUMe� for the usis .. :. permitter In th"e, prop -*se&, %oWi 16 tears of access ► sire.. and patibf'fity tit a eXisting�� land use in the sur0 4_.e:,a area. 2. That; the ..;. ,,•, -. ,, strict change oy sie�rrif,c thenaironatentt norf...; sundprap�rts si_�. 4c� 3 That llo, Pt+� +used +�� strict change is in ronkvaitce witb;7the ineral Rlwv SE7p 2: The -Ra'nctio Cucamonga Plan ring Coigis `,- Eras found _ tati � s p Eject 1af .�'t not create a sfilnificant a44.e :al . impact on the envfronont an' reco end fisspAce t6f a Negative Dpclaratfe n an Aprft" 27, 1588 1 THEREFORE, BE Ii 1E- SaL,VEC, shat pUrsuant td Soctt-�>j 65950 to d5bS5 .*f the J California Government Code, ;,that •the Pllanatia}g ! Ccraaission of the City "of JRancho Cucatwnga hereby ! ree, nds s P oval 'o; L1i rIct Awrsneni No, 08 -i}2e �� zv h 2. Tt9e 'Pl nning Co on h reby r+ecOwnds that the ; s City-,CouncfC�:;approrr. and adopt i3ove� "apmant, Ai�tr.t Amendment No. 88, ' ds `�O,estribed fn tfie ti -1e, dnd indfcatecr. ial't�ir arched �1 77 CITY OF RANC$HpO CVCAMON -! DATE- April' 27, 198D > ' 1977 TO Chairman aid Member$ of the, PlanrWhq Commissio� t. FROG:` Brad Buller, City Flapper, BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner �� a SUBJECT: ENVIROMEkTAL MSkSS'M&T ANi1 4E1tfLOPMENT AKENDMENT recey a awn e� eve; up en m r c "d+�C 6EI�sNFCAntral! t6 ° • (� R �idimP eif ential, 4-8 dwelling t~'7 per care? for a „ acre;Aarcef locste:f no. of Highland Avenue, west of i?.,tken Pvenue ;I- APR" • A portion of 2411= 47� =��. Y. PROJECT MD 'SITE DrSCRIPTION- 4 A. �.-tion Requettet., ' 'Approval o #, Development Di#rirt Anleldment7l' and ssuance df' a `t A;Ptfve I1 'iei ration. R. surroundin Land Use and 2 `ring. oll' EST'"= `Dees^ nee arn�Ci "mooed C1•a1 South are)� Mast- :t divaY ResI*ntial(S -14 dwelling uraits,ner East _ )&csnt ;Cow- Medilua Residential (44dwetling ;units tier a: red f. West - peer - Creek Channel-, Mood Catitr+al C. General" Flan W4 na¢fi� z ro,c w " - owv mesidential (4 -0 dwelling uni acre) ts per, > North - Flood Control - JI South - Freew�r r East i,ow•Mddl m Residential dwelling units per afire) West - Flood Control II ARALYS1S: F A. General: On September 23, 1987, the Planning C�mt3ssfion Fe-vMqid thr General -Plan and - CevelopmInt Dist' .Amendmet�t3 4 Medium nga � e land use designationt rom Flood ControT� aAd Residential to Low�Medi:i liesiUntial. i=or_a tE# acr; t r parcel loca )d ate— southwest "'me, of Eaknkl, btre4t 4 tilhiken Anue, that timo. -the° Pla .ring 'Coisiu�rt expressed C n "ra �abo6t a small �triaDgular '; tiece� o� prape� w� 1 L LA y y.+...y..:..ry O 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 4 ' DDA 88-05 --'- A*MSON DEVE ONT T _ ;April 11, 198$ . ge. located at, he southwest"cbrne� of the site that:w s not nei -n9 considered with the am6dments , The 'on$ acre pa e ' jf Viand, had poif- been pcluded 161 the sm jjdRja9t1 "tequ6t for twa reasons; It was noir, known whe t►er the din Oernard3rro County F]abd -Control Ois'trict woolUdeclare the- ;, piece as °skirpj!s3, and 2. That the.`one icy gtaretl of ;land had,ndi been F' included in the" egai�descrbtf advertised ' and, ; as a result, 14Id nut' b ' acted u0on ttithont r, continuing ^che, Plani;ing, Coat jssio"__rte° 9 #soh .: taco and sto weeks .A*eadvertising i #clsadi thfi� S► ii' - pieece of property, .: n! l ` Asa result, the zone acre p�rce'! ,.Was nat part of the ppro ed amendments:' Then- General :> °`' . l �P�a and Di�01*sent k isi, et - Axcend ants Were,, bsegteh a � pored by ih6 Gity 'CCat�citi. "on October "Z967t r On Eiecamber v, W;n the planning CoNtIscibrt. 3pPkmeV a Tenta ivtz Tract 13748 iocat�g one, .the 64 acre C.pa #ol at the southwctt cornAr of Banyan �..f killikeff , �4s p4r., of 'the .�� oval;- thLe fl` . ultimata!rdesIgr,,,:.f thO subdittisior 16cUded the ohe,, cre OrceVl previously '- ossittad , fr, the General '`plan And',- Revel o t District Amendment o ? s a'auld allow, for the ­dem400ent 6f ` 232 singlv�toi y lob- t�jb addition, a : and Lion- was, 3nela}ded in the ResssluUon, thw ftipulated 14ot final, app roua�i for {', the. -232 lots, -ras contingent upon acquisitign-`of,th? -,cane t&re _ ,parcel and approval of,-A ',Development Dis", Ict Amendmik to ghange ,the j designation from Head Cantrol Low- Medium Residential. Tee = _appTicent has beefie ins ib�kvact with the San 8ernakino ' Cbunt�! ACM ��Control District' and �, - ip.. the prccess ' of acquiring tWit acre parcel`. The isdu'reusting : approval c. a E'rvelopinen$r DIttt�iat Amendsiptt t6­ zoning des ioti' fi°xsm Flood , oeit�al =�to,; La i4 .Medt€,% to allo�F r for t10 full:�^_belbpment of, the *3 ip25. 8: Environmental Assesimeni Staff ,has prepp- �d.ArC& r6mental n a fry u an a er fined. chat t evelopsent Distr ct AmendmikiL*ili not Create any signifi.�nt adverse, pacts upon —h'A �t the enviV0 - nt, xf the,_.O nning Comaiission'conrur &, WitK these `;. findings, ., issuac!ce of � °��� negative-. Drc1ayQtibn W Od ,fie appropriate, a PLANKNO C"ISS1Oti STAFF' pEPORT ' OOA $845 #t +tANSON DEVELOPMENT , AprQil U, 1988 4 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 3u order for the. Planning ek*issian to app'approve�tne TevelopQ"mt District A�nckae t,, fac'"} tits support the �} following findfnys t be madams c> A. Tire` subject `property is suitable For the, proposed `land use in � r% of access, sizes and compatibility with 691sting land uses in•,surround�ng areasr,� > c B. The proposed district "change will not time at significant Impact 66 "the envirpment,,,or s4rr ending }' r propert,es. o; r C. ` the proposed I�euala t � s ciy pin i '�� in�iaaerrt #s in - conforoaeiwe With the 6ereral Pi IY. CORRESPOMEkE.- "hfj. iteo h4js be" echrea�,tsed a�s ' f�ii,; kedr n e"i't `Re art nos paowne ,the property pas �.an natfres . were sun ., o a property +»raters, titt� h 3O feet o� 'the °pav',�cct site,D,: j . REC ATIQNi Steff r;bgnds'tha4ht~ Plannfrl, is on MR Al ap�rcvst of, DevelopMent District n+ nt r OS to `.� City Council through edoptfdn of the attached Rapolutleft and issue a Negative Declaration. Resp ltrf teed, i( y: CitY:. truer t` b z ,r r BD,SMste )df`� Attachments: Ar 11 Exhibit "ts "= troy fi±n Map ff - Resolution of Approval r , ; t�q 3 LM9 LM i:. PLAN 'Op. FL IN wRTqj-,,:j !_ LM FC Qp� A 07 3 o -MCI RANCHO CUCA.% ;1 `rIii l;- r70.sAL�.r ow � c�yMl►s�a'y'.�,wi�arr 4Sr'��ww.oi. Fa' FROM *FCa PROuse SAd'$Mi l Pr i irs'ii r v.; w ♦ r. mZ'j •� l ,`�L..+�'� ✓�l � i t j r y' °'c' i r - I ITYOC 7 k'S �.1 eyey.u�u��p■ EX IFI i REsvLUTION uo, ?�� .... . -.. A- RrSii £{li`MWt" �,�*..AEiCii4 CUCAMOWjA RL.ANEtI9dG. CO,i5Si0td ;a�/ APPROV190 DEVELOPMENT TC DISTRICT P'tENWENT NO - REQUESTING A CHANGS IN THE DISTRICT DESI.6kATI�i F`:4W CONTROL TO LOV-MEDIUM RESI0MW Orl !WELLrW, taRITS PER ACRE) FOR A 1x06 ACRE: PAAqE1A0CAT0 NORTH G HIGHLAND AVENUE,- WEB OF M��: T � RVEN"ec - Aft; An, -s PORTION O 201.227 5 A. Recitals, . (i) 1�`iatianson Development has filed an application for the ; Development District ftab r-,a►t No. 88 -4i5 .as s+escri¢ed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter In this Resolution, (,rho su6,Secat Oevelopaaent District Craange request is referre4. to f� s "the applicut3i�". = '� fii3 C April 27, 1998, the Planning Covwiia &ion of the City of l Rancho Cucamonga conducted '. a duly noticed public hep,rin�,on the aptlication and concluded said hearing on that date.: - , = (iii) All legal pr #requisites ta'rhe adaption of Wti Resolution have occurred. JNL B. Resolution. .. 0 ' NOW, THEREFORE, it is�\,hereby fourtid, Aetergined ans rcaolvad by the Planning. Commission o:' the Cfty of Rancho Uucamonga ss follows:` r I. -This Commission, hereby specifically finds that all of the factz set forth in the Recitals,: Part .A, of t jil, Resoluttion are true,-and correct, 2. Rased upon . substantial eA;idence presented to this ni-�!siin V during the above - referenced public heating on April. 27, 1988, includitsg wr; 4ten and oral staff report!, toge��her with pu`alic testimony, this Co.:nission hereby specifically finds is follows; V (a) The application app4ies to "a 1,06 parcel of a; ;triangularr : configuration, located north of Avenua West of KillIken "Avenue,. i ":d east of the Deer Creek Channel.,: c;id proge,-,ty is cuvrently deognated as "Flood Control" on the Development D tricts'46', and `.. (b) . The .property to the north and west of, the r ab -pct' sitar is G designated fOr Flood control purposes and is in►proved' iti► `the beer Greek Channel ti The proway to the east of that site is designated for*.aesidential uses under the Low- tedium R,�sidentialzj District stan/iards and is turrently, . ` vacant. The property the`ioutfi is designated ''far future -to the Foothill Freeway and is presently vacr;^t, and (c) 'entatfve,:,Tract 13749, approved by the Plaihning mission on December 9, 1987 incorporated, ' the triangular property into the design of the subdivfMoo to avoid p landlocked site, s c , RESOLtt ARNING C"ISSION m No, ' ODA 88 -05 - AliMUSON DEVELOPMENT April 27, 1088 r ;U, ' 0 " Page 2 3. the Commi4ilon hereby €indg and certifies -that the proaect,;'nas been revised and conside,�ted in compliance with the Cal0ornth En virm)mental Quality Acct of 19I0 and, further, this Commission hereby rec6maends issuance of a Negat'iveAeclaratior, 4. Used upon, the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2. and 3 above, this Commission h ":�eby resolves as follows: (a) T,1at,, pursuant to Section ��55850 to 55855 of the �' C�tiifomla Government Code, that than Planning n f Commiss%n of the City of _Rancho fucamoNga hereby)l ` vecommends approval on the 27th day of April, 1988,1; Development District Amendment Xo. 88 -05. (b) Tihe Planning Gwamission hereby recommends thaw the City Council approve and adopt Develnt District ,J Awndwnt NoW8Q -05 for that property se de'4cribed 08% in Exh4bits A and , and attached ,,s .part of i• tWis Resolution hereof, (c) Dat a Certified copy of this Resolution, and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 5. Tha Deputy ,Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AW AOOPTtO TxaIS 27TH DAY 9F APRIL, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO dCAMONGA 4Y; ` a ry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST; 13raa Suller, epu y § crs ary r I, Brad Butler, ,Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission,tf the Ci y of Rancho Cucamonga,,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly -and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 7th day of April;, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: 3 f AYES; COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS': 4 a\ "WENT: COMMs "SSION£R5t - o .� � Oeve�aparent,Dfsaren ent from Flood trict A Control 00 to Caw -1 iui Residential` "ilm) for 1.1 acres dascribed as follows- ^ r That portion of` the East_.hal�f o- the Southwest quarter of tk� Southeast quarter of CeC tRitl�^a5, toxic ki jp 1 Morth, Rangd f 7 %i ` San Bernardina VAridiasn, 'e .fi.abed as follows; / L - 84.ginni, .9g at a point in fie East line of-, said Southwest starter y Me Soaifiheast quarter ofection 2 said int being diitant,,-alona 'Said .Eaui, Time North 0 041 4 " test," 341.04 feet fly -the Soutfifti: char_ of said ,Southwest, garter of said southeast r IN ' ' garter of �ai�ri 25l f _ thet�e South 9go 06 r 420 c rest, ` 172.27 feat • thence Borth k2 04" 30" 45:x7 L`;�f eait� feet, thence ilartheastarly 71$.38'feet, along a Uhgent curve , concave Sdest rly having a:.retii�{s s of 2084.37`''frrtt and a cetttraw angle f 15 44° 49i " :;, to y, `infarection thareof with said Fast ^ling -+�f fhe of the`Seutfr�ast Qciarter of said. S tio�.+ Vii; SoutMaest'trltr et a aAl04 said East r f;tte South 0 18r 08" east, 73$.61 fit 1 th. ppint of seginnino: Containin 1.Oli ace (i g r. s laore �r iess� `' ; a 0 0 _ 4s o .:f 3 (f fJrt XI •� �_.� - G.Af11P lT CiQIl � � j YAp';giA+' 0 c dry p TO _ > i s VA =$r " ! `` f �! �� },� Y �� � O�.,i iii'• ...'���ii2i'�': \,� T. {, 1' N O� A �, —X /,0701-02 4-27-88 PC Agenda,. o �- .- _-- Gi'kYIT�CHiiCA.l4+ieiNG� c4�'C STAFF REPORT AOL 4 y. DATE: April- 97.. 1988 TO 1977 Chgk.irmn and Hers of the Plani ti., Coinmt s. an �; FROM: Brad, Bul`Ier City Planners ` BY: Cynttasa �5: Kinsert .:!lssistttt Planner, � SUNECT: MIN6R D6ELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -04 - sUORT - Ar appeal of Staff's �h Si on ' o any a m4::iiiationf materials for the buff; 1119 elevations of an �xistI office building within:. the Office1Professional, �district for etect on the east side of Hellman south of base Line - ON: X08- �i31«28. I. ANTRACi s An appeal of staff 's decig1 -:n, to deny a modifi`eati.An of le Mu ding elevations to include ue the and &Mifigs at 7333 Hellman Avenue, II. BACKGROUM On Februat? 9, 1988 ` the property a�ners filed Minor oeft Taps faevie+1 88 -05 rcquesaGing nrotfifications tier: building elevations. The applicant wishes to change the W. r . redaarange We trim to a blue ells 8.6 to add blue around the windorjs -, The proposed :modifications Vere referred to th`r a :Fc tk, Review' Committee by the City Planner,. On February 'is �� �e Desig ,� Review Committee r0iewed this application and recx��v „ded,a ruN color for the the sand awnings wh�ith would be more Cct vatl6le with the existing building elevations and stile. The Committee was also ` concerned whit.,th�E "tack on” insPllation method of the awnings which may not i ,scam, ,the strong winds of the city and coOd cause a safety herard: The applicant found the recommendations unacceptable and reque d §� the Minor RevilopMent Review be deniad ta'allow the applicantito ?roceed with an appeal to the Planning Commission. "- Iht Marc ti 23, 1988 the City Planner denied'fiinor Developme� J?a61ew. 00 -b6. in a letter dated. March 2 6, 1988, the applicant Ye ested that Minor ,Development, Review 86-05 be appealed to the Planning COWSSirn. ILI. A€tALvOI1, 17ie subject office building' was opigittall,y a spanich sTy—re =►tom€ that was converted into an office structure. Sr► 97 , the ),Ity ( ;rev;fewed an, application for a two story ge den office t building s'p the e;st and a gas station 1mne0ately toAhe r;arth. At that throe, the issue of compatibility"betleen the proposal gas ' station, and Office building in relatioq; � tho existing i4fic ; building arose,' €!s p Conditionn of approval � r!ew structures ate ` 'bring required to out .,bas' ic, felements of the'. "zfstinq Canve ens C lr r p PLANNING COiW, ISSIQ STAFF REPORT ` fitiR 8$ 45 S�FFE C' office, such as wood,,sfi�:tdS, whiiE fstucca pilasters artd rgd e. , The. gas station, x4ren lluilt, brought these elements "intro ts�l: design. A 2 story;- office builing was built, upQer Sep,.r�e,. approver, at a later date.. Thejoffiue building,hasl a white stiaL.:,o- =7t exterior and red channol �.$ ,s to relate to the original' Sparfl sh style brailding. Earlier this gear, the Design Review' Q Wmittee, reviewed tie proposed addition of btu , window awnings.. and the change from. n4- orange the to blue tiles. the Committee foji,'�d the ,proposal fncunsistP tt with:: -the existing , architecture . in th6. ' the, - color change would) create 1, are incompatible ;appearafiee between the structures: The Committee J therefore, , Y,�- rendeal'-.i;h t if a change were to occur, a ;rust color w ?nld be WO' cods bleu 1 #1�;;-was a furthu conzervr of the. CmAittee that the proposed aw4irg miierial and method of attac ;t Wrul�, not Wthstand the strong wires j of the area. The Lo nittee ttcet-efoa lreca n6d a ;more durable rust 1 co1Z�, material with a sturdier mounting. Minor Devel Vent - Review 887 Was .therefore dehied used on the following fin ingsa, �t I. That the proposed awns, \`ano' tip cover would not he` consristent with the or, -Onal cd� rs of �', `be building which .served to enhance the buildings atibaliiyr with 3urrpunding elements, . , 2. The proposed color cha t.e would not comply with the building design guidelines o�f `, the Development Code (Section 27. 0.080.2,G). which lecifies -that colors cJand ,materials should be poordinate,to achi total compatibility of design. Trey should alefid well with the suj�;ounding enviromnent and not c use abrupt changes. 3 The proposed arming mterial and mounting would not withstan the strong minds of the area, IMF: RECfiEtitiTION Staff' recommends the :Planning Coissirsn dotty this appea oo`r Development : Reviert 88.05 through adoption° of the „ + attached resolution. If hbWever, the Gommissioh datermines that the propcsdd' modificetiona are acceptable, then' direct staff to prepare 'a Resolution with findings for °adopt n at'`your next Meeting. } 1 IJ CITY OF RAMC AO CGI:AM0PTt3K` Port o.Tiea. sox 807, Rmdw Cuo'ata p, Calitomm 01730.(714)989.18S' Marcie 23, 19$8 ft Lawrence A. Seifert r 7433 Hallman Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917'.:' „,r j SUBJECT: MINOR PEVELO?JwENT REVIEW 88•45 Dear Mr. Seifert: The Planning Division, hereby ,denies your request for 'the reasons discussed herein. In order to approve the Minor Developm nt review request, ceviain findings in the - affirmative a�.it be substantiated by facts, to support those findings. The :iitding„'iht ude the fa lorwing; FINDIN&S I. That the proposed use is in accordance with the objectives of ` the Development; Code, the purpose of the district "in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use,, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the publicehealth, safety, or welfare.or r�atnrigliy injurious to properties or improvements ip the vicinity.: 3. 11at the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development coli" 4. That the proposed use is consistent with the objectives of the General plan. eased ,upon staff's review of the proposal, it has, been determined that the facts to support findings one and three cannot be made in the, positive for the following reasons: That the proposed awning :and.tile cover would not b6 consistent with the original colors of the building which �wve:to enhance_ the buildings compatibility with surrounding developments. 2. the .proposed' color change would not comply with the building desigh guidelines of the Development Cade (Section 17.1D.Q6D2C),, which specifies that colors and maters -Ts should be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. They should blend well With the surrounding environment and not,eause abrupt changaa. ' ,Jtr _ li RESOLUTION ND. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCp14ONOA;PLA14NIfd1 COMMISSION DENYING AN APPEAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT AEVIEW.90. 88 -QS DATED 7333 HELL14AN AVENUE IN THE OFFICE /PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT,, APN:.208- 431 -28, A. Recitals. (1) Lawrence Seifert has filed an'applicatidn for the approval of Minor Development Review lie. 88 -05 as described in the tiiie of this Resolution, liereinafter in this Re %elution, the subject Developr nt Review' inquest is referred to as "the application". ;a of Rancho(Cucamoga�co ducc!Kf a meieti g ontthe application and Commission concluded said meeting on that date, (iii) , All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. r B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined..and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as,_.foilows: 1. This Coprwission i,ereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part", Rf this Resolution are true and'correet.. 2. Based upon substantial) evidence presented to this ,Commission during the above- referenced meeting n April- 27, 1988 including written and oral .staff reports, this Commission �-reby specifically finds as follows. (a) The aao1ication �s61 i a to property located at 7333 Hellman Avenue with a street frontage of 100.82 feet and lot depth'of 121 feet and is presently improved with an office building; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site 4s gas station, the property to the south of that site consists of an office building, the property to the east is an office building,•and the property to the west is vacant. (c) That the proposed awning and tile ;over would not be consistent with the 'original colors of the building whic(t served to enhance the buildingws compatibility with surrounding elements. ,i (d) The proposed color change wood not comply with'�the ` building design guidelines of the Development Code (Section 17,i0.050.2;C), which specifies that colors and materials should be coordinated to achieve compatibility of 4esign, >, imental to the public healtitr : safety, or welfare or tWeAr x'iY _in urious to properties or improvements In the vicinity, (c) Th6t the prophW use does not comply with each of tht� applicable.provis'ions of the Developmeimt _ Gode. , id That the proposed use is :not consistent with the``obdectives of the General Plan. 4. Oased upon the findings and conclusions set -forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this�Coaamfssion hereby, approves *denies the application subject to, each and every, condition set fortis below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herei r�,;y this m^efereoce. 5. The Deputy Secretary to: this Commission shag C ,certify to the adoption of this Resolution. _ cr APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ,27TH .DAY OF APRj,,: 2988. ' PLANNING CQ lSSION OF THE CITY Ok=-'RA160 CUCAMONGA t ay arry T. WNiil, Diairman c ATTEST: ra utter, 0 epu y ecre ary RESOLUTION PLANNIta C"ISSION - - NOR 88-05 page 2 I I te The proposed wing material and: moumting` tx,uld not withstand the �tnng winds of the area. 3. ' Uased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon.* spetitoe finoinrgs of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, #his scion hereby finds and toncludes as follows: (a) Iliat the Proposed s not in accordance with t the objectives of the Dave'.o#sttt Code, 'the purpose of the district in; which, the site is Iccated� (b) shat #.eta; proposed use, together -" with` the, !1 : :ccnaitions applicable thereto,, will be m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAX.,0NGA ` DA ,. ` � ! April 27; igBB ' J: Chairman a;yd Members of the Planning Cewission FROM: Bt.Id $u1-Yer, City Planner L! BY: Dan Coleman, Senior,planiier, LL jj sUaam SIGH PROGRAM 87-109 - LYON Review of master sign _'program 1 or a �s a su v s on signs within „the Victoria Planned Community. I. BACKGROUND-. on Dctaber 21, i987, the City Council adopted rc nanc . 3094 establishing regulations o permit of subdivi in °signs within the planned.c0mMunities, Th;,� Ordinance requir , the developer of a planned COMMUMV to submit ,a sign progrz to the Planning Commission for review and kpprovel. H. ANALYSIS: The faster sign` rograM must ,nClgt; * the detailed design ana placement ilf each sign structure. TW'WIl'liaM [yon Ccxapany y" proposes. los styles of off -site signs: 1S a mini kiosk; dnd 2) a � regular kiosk. The mini kiosk-is four feet high and would be used where only a few sign pancTs are needed. The regular -kiosk is the maximu�r " Ight feet to aupoeohodate up to 'six panels: Both, kioskk designs meet till of the standards of Ordinance Na. 3D9 -A.; At this time, the idilZ,am Lyon Company is requesting approval of kiosk locations for only the Windrowsoand the Groves Villages, The kiosk locations have been carefully revfiwed by the Planning and Engineering Divisior'4teff to.ensure that the signs do not obstruct -,, traffic visibility, "All locations "are acceptible, except for kiosk #11 in the Groves Village. ' The Engine ring Division recommends that kiosk #11 be relocated behin the public - sideralk, approximately 48 feet from the intersection (see Exhibit "A "), III. RECOMMENDATION staff recow -mds appr_eval sub3ect to" the c'onc uns seed in the attached resolution. Re full ed, ra City P ntte BO:DC:kq 77J Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Kiosk #it Master Sign Program Resolution of Approval -' aular� T.t0s3C 'bstx7j�. _ I `Pagci' 3 us+r3 pf*tAjl Page +i `-victos3a Oroves bask Caatetat Page 5 Vi 4 - t x O 0 j r� DIDIEL Al --O--m .j w. �i. ...wr CK. t= UtCc`a rN1 Oz r n �J !� /Nckek ' �s�� ," < , #.:'f c�F� ��i�GV1 ? }�'Ctt�,S� a�, °`yr`•/ i IV h Ilk J G_ 1 o I ' -•yr` PAN SL t0iP " ': SIt71q L , tk?tr2 =:.C'Y RAllt:> DNA i'' lk4r ti.`4iY. O�j (irr -, si:4 istoo ( ?1 �., i�aiWFIZ ,rid c a 2r� 7-4 ':''• ••b p v t, A > • ; Z J" �s 'a ! d as �s.. ��n'� ;y .1 VICTORIA VaROVESN' VICTORIA 3ROVE" S' rK�I�O�S /0 LOCATION K 04 1� I I IN HIGHLAND AML im 1 AT { pry► c ko„ O Tl c © c •vf CaoRi.#. Gp6vEs KI I K PROGRAM Straisht arrow I� -LT artov O Left orrIMI ... u AT ArroW w'R4ht arrIft Y.r4�crtar "&[�il� c '°j�c$RS XXX7�SK7`1[3tX��7C V F,UM nated' 2. Mina victoria model. 3omU Taus LT arrow • 3. = Ragular S/F Fdailq`Ttee L7" arrow Victoria Paiata`' LT arrbv vlldw ood Grove LT arrow t $r aaade SA arrow, PimUstom Classic* LT acaoV _ e. RAguias SIS Paa;l�e T�es.ry !T arrow w a; ' °victoria its LT- mrrcna , s�isd�ad troves arrow s, Promensde TT a!=cv Fieldstone Classics LT 'arro>P -5. Mini Victoria M044 Hoak Tour LT arrow' ' A- 6, Regular 5JF` �r Famig Tree LT arrow Victoria Point& LT arrcwr Wildwood . LT arrow' Promenade LT arrow Fieldstone Classics PT 'arrow :. Regular DOF AS /r Fieldstone 01asaics SA arrow ,Victoria WIU4rov Yfodel Hama. Tour SA arrow Wild wood Graves 5A arrow Proatuade SA arrow Victoria Pointe SA arrow ry FAY Treys SA a=ow 8. Regular DfF NIP,u ' Wildwood Crovea sA axrora Pramesade $A arrow r. IL 'Victoria Pointe SA arrow Vittoria Windrows Model Tour SA arrow Fill4st0cie rlassies LT' arrow � ;, r VICTORM GROVES RICSK PROGSA *�,, . 7 1`Y _ 9. Regular SIB Wildwood Grove SA arrow Promenade 5A arrow t ghiiz Pointe SA aazrow :rr /fait ly Tree- SA azra4' Classics . eldstons , SA arrow r ' 10. SIP Victoria WiadrM H�3el Tour .gym RT arrow ! Thank you for lsiti'ng Victorfsi Groves 11. Regular DIF i WilAwood LT arrow Promeaude: LT arrow. >_ nctori#EM?oiiste SA arc jr Family Trao S& arson= W12dw000rl G roo Re! Mrrow w Promenade RT arrow 911414st," a Classic S3► arrow .. iegular'SIg l12. tfildwood Groves AT arrow, f o Promenade LT errofz la. Regular DIF $IS Ask Victoria Pointm Rt arr(�Y 'kamily Tree sA arrow ,s _ Wxldwavd Groves _, SA irro I Prom*x*de : SA arrow V {�oria 'Pointe ; LT arrow Ui atone Classics SA arro+o;' 14. Regular DIP it/ Family Tree., SA 'srost SIP W aduood Groves SA arL "cV Prttpemoa SA arrow !I Victoria Pointe. SA. st Fieldstone Classics SA, uro r 1S. tfi Victoria H6'dal HoaeB Tour LT � jzllow toi .. �'� Re`l"\ , --DIP` West Past Family Tree &r arrow East' Pact ' WiicCwood Groves SA arrow o, A Promenade SA arrow a Victoria Pointe SA arrow Family, T"a LT arrow Fieldstone Classics SA arrow �d ;S h c a E n FPM 4 f. p- a AIRAu.r,s Yicn*,A mc r Avg iAtRAfaW ,s e,eA&CSr&V 7 r •;;ice r•J � r `. 3f. r r� lix ,1�1, 1 •.. � + 4 i� •a ` :: r0.V �Ir /hly ,, his T/ b b 2 y1, a . 1'... i. T fti� L-l-, • `1 1 1 fir' ASt, sAar. �sai_�_ Tr I �.41kMONT Yp+eK` . "5vut'N F�q� '�'�►'!7,___. :SfX�TEdE�+}:�7" F�,__._� �r �� `� 60___ 1\ J VICTORIA, F1iNARQWS. Ri4SE Prd Straight arrow 'N 4r St it arrow l RT arrow i Right arrow I. Victoria Models 40 Country $A arrow' Gardens SA arrow Meadows iA arrow VictortaGrov� Modal Hone TTour U arrow Z. Victoria Ubdela _ Country SA arrow Gardens SA arrow Meadows SA arrow _ Vic4toria Groves Model Home Tour s.: arrows, 3. Victoria Models Lountry c'.RT arrow Gardens $AJarra�r Head= � arrow c, v Victoria Groves Model home Tour SA arrow 4,. Victoria Models = Gardena SA arrow _ Country SA arrow Meadows SA arrow r a Victoria Groves! Model Home Tour SA arr*e S. W ctoria Hodeis , Country IT arrow cardensr IT arrow Meadows Lt arrow Victoria Groves Model Home Tour ST arrow b. Victoria Models Gardens RT arrow Meadows RT arrow Country SA arrow Victoria Groves Modal $ome Tour IT arrow �\ 7. Victoria Modals Country IT arrow Gardena SA.arrow Meadows $A :Arrow 8. ,� / Eliminated �tiYYMi� {XXXXIS+�:�X7�37i]IY3tYi� 9. Victoria Models 1 Gardens IT arrow Country IT arrow Meadows ° IT arrow Victoria, Groves Mode; Home Tour LT arrow i' p_3 60___ 1\ Victoria, Groves Model Tour IT arrow 18. Victoria Models Victoria Groves. Modal Tour LT arrow A: 19. llcyoria Models W►,adowa SA arrow Gardens SL arrow;, Country SA, arrow 20 Victoria Models country LT arrow �Gardens �RpT arrow P.1 iterrldQwa , arrow 21. Vif:toris Models Victoria Groves Nodal Tours RT arrra.'w -- 22. Victoria tfodols country r,'= SA arrow Gardens SA atronr MeadOwrs 5A arrow Ip A tk VICTORIA WWROWS KIOSZ PROGRAM _ _ fI _ _.- :_ - 10. V Victoria Models .. Viotoria Groves Model Tests: S SA arrow ll.. V Victoria Models r Vfotoria Gtovss Model Tour S SA arrow 12. ( (fictorialmod*IL, Co untry ''arroa Gardens !l „ SA arrow ` f , foadows SA arrow , 1J� � II � ; Victoria Grove& Mk• "el Tour L �� ; r I 14. V Victoria Hodela j r C Country -IT arrow j Gardens AT arrow Mssdows IT a arrow 15. V Victoria Model Victoria Groves Modal Tour S SA Arrow 15. t tlictoiis Models Country Sal arrow Gardens SA arrow - - Meadows SA arrow fs� 1; 1 ?. V Victoria Models f ` x � Z f tY •� r d.' + i b H ,z r , �~ •ti n I b LLL i ¢ S •� r V ''� + .•f q v. . y .� 14 a K 1.: NI {YA _ PL • w . R :"do a= 7►. L , \lt x��tsr q ...t t,0 �•.:t 1r Tw a J ,t ^ AVC, I � t � � � s tr � My � s w p.� V_ f J ,t ^ AVC, I � t � � � s tr � My � s p t�.� A• j t r: c. o L ��G r 'S R I i W „ wj �4 °a l c sm VICTORIA "WINOR" f4 ,� SAO O VIC _ o'W� AA .f a, 1k j t1 ei •. at `ct 10- ff E; ;. two , o :s { J41 0100 �I � * + ' r- � P qrf VIC -Toy ; J, AKIG i r DRPWS Lo Oil �. r Rr — c RE ,r LUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAL, ING ' COMMI5�ION OF THE CITY OF;- RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING SIGN PERMIT 81409, A CASTER Si* PROGRAM FOR #F -SITe SUSDIVISlOW SIGNS k =THIS+ THE VICTORIA PLANNED - CONRLW lid _ N{Nf,'TORE QRE# ° BC ii RESOLVED that ihe. Planning Coyan#ssion of the " of Rancho Cut nga does hereby approve Sign Permit 877309 �ab�ert to the, - �o�cwing conditions of approvo L 1Ttfat kirisk flf fin the Victoria- Groves Village shall be. relocated bear #ndihp, public sidewalk to the satisfaction 4 � of the City Grgineeil 2.. That al l future off -site 'subdivisions signs uithisr, the „ Victoria Lakes ad Victoria _.Vifteds Villages be any I additional kiosk locations ri thjn the Victoria Windrows and Victoria Groves Villages shall, re ee review task approval by this :ccwssion. 3. All kiosk sign- ^shall ; co„ #:irm to ;`th1 provf3f� ns of; Ordinance. No, W �A APPROVED AND ADOPTEil THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL" 1988, it PLANNING MISSION OF THE CITY,�OF RANCHO CUCA#!ONGA BY: arry T. MENter, a man - a ATT"T grad u , er, Deputy Secretary J f I, Brad Buller, `Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission q, the City of z II poncho Coca ongac, du hereby certify that the for;sgoing ResolUtiaY' S duly alod regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning ;Cor ft >sion of the City of Rancho Ctcamonga, at a Iregular mating of the Planning Cci;;ion held on tine 97th day of April, `1986,'ay the followinq v to -to -wit• : = AYES- Ct ISSIOARS �� NOES: COWISSIdNERS: � Q ?3 ztv"I: q,,COWISSIOI&S; c i e r' ( -67 ri' 1i 0 �t Df, -rE: April E7, 1988 .` r �1 E3 1977 TO: Chairman eld Mem�frvT the Pl,.-nning commis Sio'n FROM: Brad .Buller, City Planner- By Otto kroutil, Deputy City Planner. a. SUBJECT: . PLANN ING DTYISI6 WORK PROGAAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988/8.9 time, all City year" about �'bepartnenta ire asked to;develo t4eir budget proposal for the upcomim;, fiscal mar 6eginninr July ;t As an integral part of the budgetary' proces�,\ the Planning' Division develops a work program which - outlines necess %\� staffing, ,resour . et, ,, and priorities. This pragran js urtfitrtate jr eseitted t��' Council, along with the budget., The report and the aft`60ments outline the status of thy,; fiscal years— work program, and preset a recommended work program ror the next fiscal year, The Commission %s requested to comment on the work progra jp and } IMMIL especially on the pr 'cities. " H0vever, 4se keep in, mind that the great majority of theVork program. it&is are pt °ogrmms gyer'Whig we have no discretion; when �tV project is filedt"' -we rust process it, when a complaint is receivai4 °we must deal with it, and when new. 5tate�(r Federal laws are passed, we must follow their, mandate. This means t`h'at ` only a relatively small portion of staff' time is available for City ' initiated projects. Because of its complexity, thj1 information is presented in �jt irate 1 attachments as follows: 0 Status of Fly 87/88 Prugrams - - , o Propi,sed FY-48/89 K arming 0ivisio�Wor;� Program.. Cur ��nt Planai'ng A�.xcace P1;mhing code Enforcement RECOMMENDATION- It is requested that the Com�lssiop rev ew acid .confirm the proposed-P-T'anning Division Work Program fqf siscai Year 19881,89, ' Re sjvhSpf ulIy s Ct ANIL a 1 lira er Cit�r P annex 88:Owr.jr i ��, ITEM PLANNING COWISSION $TAFF PEPCRF � Planning bivi Oon Woeklprog aih ,VY 198$/89 . kl L i _..- � :April =2TD 1,38 Rag e. � L1 At_ �c�mentss tat of 87/88 Pro r_m; '•ti Propdsed FY 88(89" PlanOih Sivt; -ion wofk `Prborasg ` Currant Planning advance Planning :• :a r,• Coda Enforcement a °' r' shy 6 tY y ` zO .a is o I i U b Evep, though 1986 was a recorC'breaking yaa'r in to Of vol4e`bf developrrent, in Rancho Cucamong 1987 Ind «, rrOdords- i t 3 i t as t'a,toe 6umber. of applicafitons protested. by she planning 0M lion. ! otxt d's�'1, 54 ti ►r. � I i aporicatirns z�are subodtted lah"'bi't "'An, In ad &titian, respgnsibilitie.^ for historical, preui4atibn were transfer,�ed to Piannfog. Planning now provides ..#aff to the Nist "icat Preservation Commission, and although a new ASSOCia0; Planner =wcs hireWfor this Purpose, �Y significant,, resour.,os aril Very feeeded%,. a fissure at smooth transition. ° L � Fianafng vas als6) recently s tr f iv respons #bittt� over tM.. _de b)pFment a. .they 4s ,Cit trait system, y Ih1 5 is a major rroJOW'Which will diawttd substantial .��fia;itra nt of SUM-timt There were also i number of owher•�Ysmatler proj�ts, Our Pot on worx pt4yram, that needed Me attention. These include median design !cork for Haven Avenue median; street*tp for 19th st et, 9ase t,inc, AEM and Pr, liibatd• oi`f�si subdivision ti , .' tx m a � Windoie Sign QrdinaWe rwit'lications, work on a video ioa for p =our Oes�..hpmjnt- review process amendments to planned Communitiest,;�.chd k'y' ProvisiG4; reviews of ;1 setbacks in Planned CooxnunIties; and numerous others."- Ig spite of t'rdditi,nnat warltload, wor , on M's year's, pro -rams is proceeding gall. In 6 arrt , j ost. PY<50rif , i end °,11. items ar 'either , completed, on 'tchedul�e, or not •unredsonahly,dal ap -,d. "xceptfans to this lrit I the "development aof'�tha. computerized Geographic InYorniaiicn System (GTSa, std the 611iside Cp r grading ,agerle � both of which i,pvolve :other pity departments, and the aeveloptpgat kk r * tes which ar. 44 months behintk:5chec rie�� "game =; I�Xer priority dOayed or orl. hold. .Way xnt cipated in the beg��:ning _of t?�e d�vyt,am ;Year in that `itvai ?abu stcff time did not match Projected needs. The 'tee; w6re includes sh60d there -be a,tempf�r y s��rnturre 0eve'h ent a .�ati,�ns which of coRtrse said not Y., � acccr. " Sates of ali ;!+to►�k ;.i°ugram igns is auttn -d or, the fo�owing p1 °c J 0 rl 6 07 1- 04-27-88 PC_ aendd of 5 J 1 a PROGRI� �. TAT6S PRIORITY, I Il__ �\ 1. development Frocess4nil ServiSes ongoing /As Scheduled ` 2.' Public Information Services Ongoing /As Sched'jled, 1 ) 3. Code Enforcement � OnOing /Rs Scheduled 4. Co►mauaity Development : 81oc� Ongoing /As Scheduled Grants S. Inter- governarental relations Ongoini,As $ct�_-duled 6. General Plan Land :Ust'AmeneaentsP Oogding /As Schlodulld 7 Devetopmerft`�Jistrict Amendmeni:s Ongoing /As 'Scheduled 8. Geograptlic information System _ An production, 'with �., pletian date `„ yet to _ be, anndun &,-4 One- AW complete, un4jrgo� Ze4ting. 9. Foothill Corridor Specific Plan Completed as 5citer. . and „EIR 10. Sphere of :.Influence Annexation Ongoing, with init;le'd work under -, Strategy way. , 11. General Plan Administrative Ongoing. completion scheduled this 4pdate summer. r� i Haven Parkway Landscape Plan Transferrer to Engineering. /� are to assistc'Engineering in w6l,king With consultant who, has just started inventory of field conditions.' c. 13. Minimum Lot Size /Unit Size Study 8'IA Market Study completed one year dater than expected.. Report presented to Com m,J�oWon �., and Ordinance revisions initiated. 1. 14. Hillside u�rading 0veriay On hold pen4ing'-8uiia4g Safety c District (lead dearnent) action tp „pursue. a L rl rc _ 7 =draft port coo P1 eted' I5 me v p': i0edti ofl Stual } 16. Treet'x',idinanee `Update l fn praductio". ker�ont urig4it disraussion rril'l i:hangc focus '--f PRIORITY II 17EMS {� ' °,. 17,,, Development Code Update ' Stal^ti�"6 last � , we are aooGt 4 to '6 o*nths behiigd schedule. Chapter 1 .'� fs complete, awaitin % %Attorney comments„ Chapter -2 is rafted. „ ' 18. Hazardous Matf,,kT is.Ordinance, V if " On schedule, Development��'- Code revisioeis needed to igiplopent Plan_ . 1 ucot � is Deuelopme it3Actid�itites `As pl.onnedR. IEW sc aac -led for M 26. Genera] rcacc Coss unit, . hecien Ohf 1chduile,, ,to` be Completed `his 21.-Design Criterie ,guideline �� Not. ted, bhl�t- of work to o occur FY 22. Co►tnty Planning 634.0 "g/As Schhdul ed 23, Design Excp]lence Awards L 4!nderay, scheduled for May 24. $MARA (State Mining; and ! Reclamation Act) Incorporated finta GeflPwaT Plan 1, update 25. Multiple Housing Parking and ;111 Comp]et�! on time Design Standards PRIORITY III ITEMS I I 26. Senior Hotisino Activities 0nga4nlAs Scheduled 27. Wwanda Specific Plan Amendment On Hold/Priority Ill ' 28.-TraiI Study On hold. Planing has been g :venr 0 lead responsibility. AWaitifng _ revised project scope to, u,gto back to founcil for approval 29 Annexation of Victoria Out in. Production } Parcels f a t {r 3Q. Billboard `tondemi'atfor y� ro ram 9 O Hold /Priority IV $I. Code Enforcement Community nqv Watch /community Awareness Program. 32« Street Naming Ordinance /Narde On Holt? riut*ity Iii Changes 33. San Sevaine Creek P1 an, �otlorio) Completed:. 'thr5ugh County, in negotistigps to annex. 34. Day CanyonJEtiwanda Heights Plan Under re e4`W. as Pledned. 35. Office"Mar�ial'Updater, On Hold/ iority IV , k 36. Etiwand3 5 ecif ;;. Plan Revisions Com ete ; as sciredu ed. 37. Land Use &;Remogra phi c 'Data Base Ins 1 nfi23a1 stages." Priority IV. 38. Community-D,ofile T � 39. Antennafgagul4,tlof Study Qn -Hold. Cc sion,a proved scope of ,work. To _start June 1988. Priority IV. r "'. 4.0,. ELandscape /Irrigation Guidelin�5 draft =house model home paicy implemented. 41 Entertainment Permits '' In in' Rene�vats shifted +� 11 Administrai<ive Services,,_, Ordinance changes ere:.propot%d. 42,. "Adult Business Zoning Controls ' Qn Hold. rt i'n June 1988. Prioefty IY, � 43. Trails Committe �� -rh Qngoing /As scheduled. Sercio Planner now ettegds all. meetings t" give greaten support to 'committee, 44. Sign, Ordinance Amendment completed through CoiamiSSiQlt. .cifiy Coufioil will 'review in Kay. 45. I.S.A. Executive Summary Completed, at prineer >. r ; 46« Special Projects ongoirg�activitya U Aft- v PRO MEW 9->P1. iNINS DIVISIOlt mx PROGRM The programs sumarized(- the following _pages are recommendedr for, tba upcoming fiscal year. ,�rojram priorities are based zr sevora-.l €ac`brs, including, legal mandate arO,4 past direction by theme &o Mis ion .,and City Council. 'Emphasis is also Placed on existing oVWIeaents,, with the iptent of _. completing ongoing projects be €ere npw ones'are'undertakan. The programs are organized in three separate sections, under Current planning, a Advance Planning,"and Code Enforceiaent, -, JIe grgapizational structure of the PTannirg Civision.� A _summary,,foR` each se,;t�-un is a?su included. Staff' resources necessary tc complete each program are expresvd,4ff person weeks:(p1WKS). As in.,previou5 years, there-'are more projects *,,a�; r a 4 WORX PRV6itLlY'1 SUWl9AV: CURP�tNr OL.dValING. _-- ---- p`� �R OGRAti ;STA i7S P /WKS 1. Development- Processing Services Ongoing` 357' n- 2. Public Information Services Ongoing 84 3. Geographic'Information System ongoing 20 4. Lot.aize /unit Size Study, "_ Finish 8/88 T" 5. 'free Ordinance Update, Meer -8/89 5. jjre is Study New 8'd/89 3A 7. Design Criteria Guidebook New 4; 09'J� x, 8c Office Minfial, Updake Nett 8$189" 1 _ 9. Interdepartmental Support ' Ongoing Id 10. Street Tree List update New 83/8g, 11. Special Projeets ongaing 31 TOTAL. PROJECTED "TOTAL 53q AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS 4�d PROJECTEV SHORTAGE* Ali P /WK:S' t A new Associate Planner position is bei6l regaes tsd to assist kith the program i 3 4 _ t Q O �1 _1g8R�89 �x PROGR,ikl 1 1. MirJ.OPNW PROCESSING SERVICES, 357 This function prov =i as or,the processing of- all 'itnt develo a licationg tracts, CUP'S pm. pp t fie• `; design review, variances,, etc.1, end tho- coor(linat;on of velo' ent/desi n review pm process ,!groin preliminary 'revic*f, tili,cluding required ;preliminary reviews requ -red for, projects on; Foothill Boulevard) to plan chec and coni tructiou inspection.i. Prior_ ity It jt 2. NBL1C INFORMATI09 SEXYILES: 04 This, sere ce ,tgrou provides reformation to the . public at that- counter and over th , telephone. £gin addition, ,rthis _grop, is resoinsihle for . A&, revieOng apprdOing niflor petmit, applications, O.e. room additions, signsj. 6 Priority.-6 3. SE6SRAPHI C 11dFOR!!�! Ti-� STEM: � 2q k Comp eta deppent of computerized information ' system for Development and Revenue; Assessment. Also includes try fining and development+ of _basic k operational routi'�es for all staff.. Priori: I '" 4 . SITE NIT SIZE STIMY. .1 E Comp Bete Judy of �I ni'mum lot sizes and minimum j unit sizes to addniss Planning Commissiop /City Council. Concerni'`� regarding, neigh66rhood appearance, usaMe yard are4, design quality within small lot- sub'divisl'on5, in p ,ocular in the Low-Medium Residential 6 dwelling units /acrit) optional density rangey.` s ' Priority-, I j; t µ A ".fiance. review of t a Tree Preservation Or Attention will focus on the impact,of`t IOil r beetle ter the Eucalyptus windrows, and Whether ! the trees should be saved 0, planted on ivate ,^ property. ?ti�1 Prior. ity J p I 6. TRAILS SMY, ZO A comprehensive study of trail implementation, including financial sources and maintenance/enforcement--Programs. 7 DESIGN CRITERIA GUIDEBOOK: � ii 1s. is n en ed to be a comprehensive design supplement coatalning extensive graphics to < communicate ^ommunity ems" goals: aM standards. Graphics would require consultant contract. Support staff to Advance Planning.' Prier. ity III ca ,rte: _ 8. OFFICE MANUAL UPDATE: Ask Revise manna as 'Aecesxary to, refEect current (, procedures for Planning Divisii'n. -y Priarity� IV 9. INTERDEPARTHENTAL SUPPORT: 10 This is an area o support to other City departments with their work program itens, such -> as, beautification studies, etc. Priority: IV ID'. DESIGNATED STREET 7°REE LtsTc Assist Engineering Divis on in the update of designated street trees as part of their street a tree inventory. Pr_ 'o�rit_v• IY D 11. SPECIAL PROJECTS: - 21 0 Priority: As Needed i gK. PROGRAM SU*AkY: ADVANCE PLANNING 4, �PROGRAM r STATUS P /WKS 1. Community Development Block Grants Ouraing 36 2. i.. inter - governmental Relations On�loing 7_ 3. General Plan Land Use Amendments Ongoing 7 4. Geographic - Information System Ongoing ; 7 3 S. Sphere of Influent ,Annexation Strategy Ongoing 1 6. General Plan Administrative Update Final text 3 Pub,11shing 7. Hazardous Materials Ordinance Finil text 4 PNblIshinq fF 8. Economic Development Activities Ongoing 10 �i 4 9. General Plan /Cotatinity, pesign Element 'Final text 2 Publishing 10. Design riteria Guidebook Ongoing 2c- 11. County Planning Ongoing 12. Se0,or Housing Activities Orgoing 4 13. Day Canyon /Etiwanda Hey hts Plan" 6_ 14. Land Use & Demographic Data Base Ongoing 5 15. Community Profile Update Ongoing 3 16. Special Projects Ongoing 40 17. Housing Element Update New 88/89 31 18. Advance Planning Data System Module New 88/89: 22 1 -19. Strategic Planning Program New 88/89 3 20. Historic Preservation Program New 46:' , 21. Hillsfde Grading Overlay Transfer from 2 Current Planning 22. Design Excellence Program - Tra fe, from 3_ `` Current planning a SI 2S. Street laming Ordinance Update Transfer f, om ) 5 Current Planning J 0 24. Street Name Changes 5 flew /Contr4Lt 6 � 25. Antenna' Regal a� Study Transfer i!rom 2 o ;urrent Planning 26. Landscape /Zrrigatiar�gui del inaV ' Transfer from 2 - C Current Planning 27. , Foothill %1-�15 Freeway 8eaa�tificaiion New /Contract 28. Development Code�Rdate Transfer fr." Current Plano 6 TOTAL PROJECTED TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR.PROJECTS, 3122 294 P"riECTED SHO'RTAGE cab P/WKS; s%�1 % ) r Y _ Y ; i n 1 ) ff - rS z 'ADMANCE PLANNING Aft o �d PROPOSED WORK P :GRIM FOR 1988= 1g.�;,.> J PRlt1�-�,,kAMS EajiiK 1. COMA9tiMITY1 MELt WNt BLOCK ARANTS: Rare o uF ca, ga's dun ng on FY 87j88 -is :expected to be approximately $4i7,Qao. This area will continue to entail; several I distinct sets of re ,1ponsibilities listed as follows: a. Block Grant /flannind - This,;nvolyes 8 ,-,,the ',,the process of assessing the community's needs, with other departments arid agencies, community 3,7,9ups and decision makers. Development of applicatlon to,HUD for CDBG funds for recommended profit. -s. Also entails development of technic' iiocwmentation including NEPA processing. portions of this task are to be contracted oat. b. Block Gratnt /A&Intstratiota - This component'Tnv eves it B w ' respons bpi es associated with on going administration and monitoring of., the COflG program to assure compliance with HUD requirements. Responsibilities include preparation of annual l Grantee Performance Reports, quarterly reports on contractor ;subcontractor activi ±4es„ and minority basiness activities, relocation, a-nd others. Also requires keeping abreast of constant changes in federal legislation and resulting changes in statutory regulations and maintaining working relationships with HUD at both local and federal levels. Includes maintenance of financial, technical and environmental files for monitoring by HUD for compliance with: Federal regulations and audits of financial records. Portions of this task are to be contracted out. t J l: , l 1 � r t PROGRAMS PAWKa C. Block Grant/pro �: __e__s��manaa ent - This 12 . component cons is S of work required to,implea:,int ` yr manage spacific programs funded through +Block Grants. This will include our Senior Repair o Program and,,Rehabilitation Loan Program as well " as programs to be selected by the City Council, Rehabilitation programs involve > working with the County Office of Community Development, monitoring of County's performance, negotiations, and resolving public grievances:' " (This is a time consuming activity, dealing "+ „:,' with "people” problems, has to be handled with sensitivity.) d. Qutreacb -o ResponsibilitfiUs I,nciude 4 outreac activities 'nsuch as— advertising, articles, flyers, etc.,oprov.. ejng itrrormation to the public. As a result df VUD comments, we .: will need to continue our efforts in this area, with particular emphasis on minority participation in our programs,. e. Housing Assistanca Plait - Our current A 4_ f new H P will be ,r— required by tU end. of September in Federal •"accordance with regulations. Priority: I _ - =TOTAL 316 2. INTER- GOVERNKEKt'AL RELATIONS: 'this area of T responsibi i -ty involves information gathering, coordination, analysis and" reports•to various public agencies. Examples include- work with'. SLAG (Regional Housing Allocation Model. Growth> Forecasts, 208 plans, etc.), - neighboring cities /county (Foothill Community Plan, Greenbelt Study), state agencies (Rt. 30 Freeway ' Study, Department of Finance) and numerous others. 'Priority: I 3. iaENEPAL PLAN LAND USE MENDl4ENTS. i Continuous; to respond toapp icationsand City -�" Planning Commission and City Council direction;.. 4 times per year, may include Elk's as required. (j Priority: 1 L , PROGRAM. �. P /WKS 4. bEt#MMIC'INFOMArl k Stiibi; `Compute �p 7 (, development '-of com puter nf`drmation system Tor'Vsvilopll and 'Revenue AcZessmept. Also. includes tr3i,�ing and" 46vetopnent of .`basic operational routines , a4* all` st iff. vR . Priority-" �a �:._.. S. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ANNEXATION. STRATE$y: \ •' 7 An approach needs" to be dOva - ope or in ,t stion ` r of future a$fiexationst�� dill " involve an assessment. of indivi4u;i 4as is teig► &f fis��:ati impact,, servicesr llabili*± , tAmi;ig `and i phasing, political imptiaations aFd feasi4i ;lity; w*.)rk [rith'`LAFC staffs- Cq.jnt�' -5¢cw+ R tstricti, ar'd land owners. c !r f Priority. 1 6, MORAL AWINIStRATIVE � t �'�E - Camp etes. final text (Tn - "asap ' qy sions and coordinate publication of the r' %Wised General plan and r18 , } , Priorfiwt I .� .-.- -- . P 7. FI �i p1ATERIa1LSiiliiiiA�E: Cotp�lete o fin F doRamestts� 7 ev a revi53��n�� in�,mder to implement�,Hazardosss {casts Plain `� A ] 8. ECONNIC WWELOPNEW ACT I` lrL ll assist iPl \ Community Geve Opment`wit9 tie preparation, and materials for `econom,k development conferences; 1! i.e., IEW Conf encc: r\ D Pri ori�Ey I I'll ' " 9. GENE GENE,rCMNSTY-4ES101, EJLEKEN - UPOATR: Complete __final text and` n4 ° revia oatc s and coordinate publicatton of the rek,4 d document. Pri6rity: I `l 10. DESI CRI r£RYI� WlIiDED3c�}A6C: 26 c This is ntvan ed to be a 20.4r ensive design supplement ,, cd atainins exteins$.v :,,graph] �s ,to . f communicete community " � ' goals and standards. Graphic "s wool d'reouire consul kant�- contract. Priority: I c, 0 11. CtDwE1, i PLAMIRR: Moni�ob* and comment 10 4 � on deve: opment- "proposals in tbei CkyY s sphere`if, ., influence, such as the Rock-,t.O'u04r;, to assure, consistency with City's poii°eies. dust be abae,: to respond to County' s�sr dole. Prlorit : it 12. SENIOR tWUSING I$9 riVITIES,. Review and' mopitar sensor pro ects un ev the Cityls.SHOQ 6 prwvisions. Monitoring aaidi reviewing new. Development Agreements, Priorft<(: 'II n 13. DAY. CWON dj.Q DHE2 � s _ 5 $ Continuous ,prccgss or, devetlopfrrg conreptval pl anni rg;. framewu�ik' for dbout 16ft acres between Day and Etiwan j #1 Creeks. D�velar, foHoat and climate for ftN re annexations Nowis,r McNay, Lyon, Dilorio, University of Crr- *aria). 14. LAND +USE'°AND O .c, PHIc �'- :%`'�,.., �* Digni for ng an aap a.1'ng tDa rs pro5raaa ' " nvol i es p( tiino,'.together in n organized fa �c:on all ; avai?�able information orr; laaad' use and` demographics. �o -1 Priority: T 15. COMMUNITY MFILE. Update brocr� re. Priority: IV `? ` o ,,7 -. Q t. 1 _r -rte �'{_":._.'..�. '`NOJ�CFS '5 1$. SPEOM, paajkrs.`' T IS,Ja, one 4rea 4a ^� '• r re"WS 2s ,' �� t.W., eludes 7 -;�O fic - -'a descr.iptiOn .an includes a iything acid -- u'erjrthifig 1 ,. drat doesn't fit anywhere-'< else. , Ekamples -data i_"elude 'nanagemgnt3, litigation, fina,ncial planning:, growth forrc-, 4th St4 .0 it . Rock Crusher,' th' Re icrr' g �' and responses to various brushfires, Pr #ori ., 7. F1MINS EL v lid V,,; This project Is mandate State aw' #or dop: �4 'evised y. xrr� ,housinq element, to include such new pr&isions��' such as emergency sheltersand trapsportatidn i8. ? PdWAING DATA S� )Ulu =;L D coeve� unct on wit a revenue , Assessmoii"siono u - cout+d III tP sysesa of Advan� , ng; data whicts c, rir a ��egaiai iy amd routt� fy .1, Fated for bath General Plan'' ,and, Spedjl Project utilization. Pririr�3ty. `1I r w�'` � 19 �TdTEGIC P1ARt XJWI PRtt"�i2Aid: 'Bevelais ak 'y4 ! i group °' i nforniati n sources which will monito "r" � � • ' related rational, state and laeai items in, order ' to igtl, io4te needed, cha�iges" to s existing planningor Bevel cerit amide pirovisi.9ns, �riOr 01;,` t i I 20. KISTGRIC P�'E5ER1� #TIli�4 PRil 4�: pti�s�tide " , � L „a F� staf nag for'`tie ; ii storis Preservation .Commission, In order ;,to keep the His.torfc l� �6 Preservation List current, research Landia�,,X and Alteration AWIcations and deve'l'op oducai idnral' materials and programs, U 1 b PROGRAMS � PIWKS *21. HELL WE Eli UG OVERLAY DISTRICT: Provide 2 support sery tes�t� : t e tiui iery Safety r, Division for the development of a C4de'Amendment to establish an overlay'�ohe fay^ areas with rl slope of 10 pevdent or grQater to_ oroVide U extensive grading policies for hillside areas. Priority. 11 *22. DESIGN( AURDS EXCELLENCE PAOQRF ; - Entails ' 3 > pubIkity, comps Ong a noM :not on ;; Est, taRino . p#otographs and work' with Cowis�ian Jurty to select recipients. , - Contract,- Avelco2rit 4 monitoring for name places .4rOard p'iagees { PRIORITY* I ; *23, SrREET,HAil1 weg1)Iw&,4&TE# Revise street nam ng. guidelines to r n with 911 Emergency, System Prioritye III I, 243 STREET NAkE CHUGES: Revisior,df approximately 12 existing or proposed- sti = *ets to - reduce similarily,- earned or tonfusing'sitrations, a which could afNctt public -safety .responses. 'ul�l `i�Jring These ` revisions invoivli , a } consultant to provide 5taiff ng for the public �- review and staffing pc-ocess. Priority 'IV t *25. ANTEM.A REWLATION STl Y A "study 2 regardinq,:the C fty s saga cite , isKt and antennas requlation� in response to various appeals for, Minor development Review and Varii.;ce applications. Priority. IV *26. La1liDSCAWIRRIGATION GUIDELINES: 2 �` Complete `findf draft from existing draft of,,(' landscape and irrigation design Standards to", implement water conservation. Final pro,4=t to be patterned after LandscapalIrrigation Guidebook for the County of Ventura. Priority: IV y �; — ._- - COQE ENFORE�tENi PROPOSER WORK PROGRAM FOR PROGRAMS P /WKS 'l PROPERTY IgAl il'E14&CUAESTHETICS 35 r` Activities MR at maintenance ann3 improvement of the aesthetic quality ref, the community. 'Includes dealing with trash and debris, problems of outside storage and screening, landscape '. maintenance,,,,,care of parking lots and trash enclosures, vacant _lots, etc. 2.. LAilil USE /ZMING ENFORCENW* Activ t e' es involving enforcement of the land use provisions of the Development Cods,, such as illegal use of property, mogitoring of non conforming uses_, use of lane without necessary permits,, monitoring of parking. provisions, modifications to approved conditions, etc.,, 3d SIGN REMOTION• / ' 37 r All activities r�Tated to 0 �'h'4 `City Sign Ordinance, Iptn , ip inspection, r, pyblicibusiness cont eA tion, removal of signs in the pub T.ic ri it it -way, enforcement. 4.. VEHICLE PARKIPiG � STOUGE /P91VATE PROi�'IERTY: 27 Activ tomes VEHICLE- og� � cont vate storage o l "s of n vien�aipice'ireastt..ovew n. ` ,,qehi cl es, vehi el /s for commercial us' a in residential area0,,,. oversize /overweight vehicles, recreational vehicles, lawn parking, commercial repairs in driveway /garage, painting /oversprey,,' etc. J 5.1' VEHICLE PAWING CONTROL PI LIC PROPERTY] v 8 Activities related to vehicle parking/storage, in public streets, easements and access areas.. Includes abandoned vehicles, recreational /commercial vehicles, unattached. , trailers; semis on residential streets,, use of vehicles for advertisement. Cooperation and . support of Sheriff's enforcement program. E, - n jj'I 6. PUBLIC RUTS HgM TH SAFETM WELFARE a d A;tiV t es aimed at* contra 1. ng aza�"dous conditiotls arid nuiancas, fire bazar, . Pool/water . Securyy. unsecured `Vjcai,t � structures, dumgali%;V blowing dust and sand?, noiselvibration /glaretodor problems, refuse.'< accumulation, etc. a. MIML REGUTIONA S Activities' 'related to animal problems., zoning violations., barking dugs, sanitation related ,` complaints, bee keepi gs location ',pf large animals n tat, excessi a nutSber of pe�4, .etc. a. PERNITS VELV MIT Actin t es r ate tt%parittiig' r�3q�airemots: satelli'ta dis Wantenna installations$ tkatebdard ramps, ille 1 tree res s1 s, screening of equip esrtit, tr gorary,`usesl's es facilities+- in traCtS, Special elAtSs recycling, ltd:. �r r, 9.. BUSINESS- 41PMTIONS: . Involves contro S on Homo Qccupatf,i,ns, roadside � vendors, .er to door. So`iciiors, etc, \ j 14. WEER ARh'IEMENTT'PPAVATE PROPERTY. 3 Ask j Contra service prove �� 'y ct dungy Department of Agriculture. Requites coordination`, with County, referrals and toAtract administration._ 11. VECTOR CONTROL., 2 This area s a"ind"f"ed through contract with West Valley hector Control District. Involves contract administration, coordination, ' and referrals. May require significant public contact during fly season. j, ji 12. CEi llliiIT1C IBStiiRENES5• / proactive progr°ara aimed at educating the public about the City's programs. Includes I articles, 1ighborhood meetings, participation in community] vents, correspondence, etc. f - If TOTAL CODE ENFORMNEhT 147 w i `? CM OF PAXCH() CUCAMONGA �►"` . a <? ,MEMORANDUM -,jF DATE: Feur ry 2, 1988 TO: Brad sulur' C1ty Planner FROR.* bast CstliNpan' Senior` Planno0e/ 5li6JEGT. 3987 DEVEL&NENT AGTIVIT: itE i 9�T 198T 8rak all previWt records for devt*o�ant ap althot the total building per t "S plication sub�sit is� /#400 .11, fr" 19$6. . t� Oti+icJ+ ep y roo 4rxJ 41Ni Jam` \. 20wo t 100 '. .. � 1 1974 Iva0 1981 10,ft ' W88 1"d 1998 too 1407 YEAR 1dA lGiit tyf}t Y �AL4 t'E �1 ' Tito attached ti$6ie indicates that a totAl of 1,254 applications were. submitted during 1987, twging frro #tae Occupation Permits to Genar-TI Plan Amendments, This represents a 48.21.inorease over 1986, it is f Significant to note by comparison that staffing levels only incressed by 14.2% for Current Planning} hence the corresponding workload crisis. l p i am EL a El W D ----- t3TY OF RANCHCI CMAMONGA �U Ago STAFF REPORT DATE: April 27, 1988 197 T0. ChairmaW And 46 ab�5 of the Planning Commission FROW Brad BulIer,;.:City Planner r� BY Alan Warren; A:p3ociate Planner SUBJECT:. FOOTHILL BOULEVARR DE!ftt1 r I. BACKGROUND: On S:pternber 16, 1981, the City Council approved 'the 00 `t1T- Bculevat, , Specific Ptah (FSP)- The FSP was a acted to Provide a unifieir 4evel6pajent scheme for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor thr4augh the coamwnfty. A. significant portion of this plan is the special streetscapa design provisions t4 tie xogether the visual aspects of this rsajor� coiftercial roMdWAY. The portion of Foothill Boulevard between ffavenk Avenue and the I -16 Freeway was not part of the Specific pla" study and therefore its provisions do not apply to the dwelopiaent of that portion of the corridor.. At the time of FSP approval„ the Planning Cc ission and City Cuur=,cil expressed tho desire to include siificant design provisions of she rest of the Bouleva t Thisrreport✓s *arfz6ssstaff's work to date on this item, and staff is requestin Commission guidance on the draft regulations. DIZUSStf1N• The implementations ?f the FSP Design Standards is pi^apose as amendments to the Terra Vista Planned ComOunity (TVPC) and the Industrial Area Specific �fl amendments (ISP). These will form art addend to U.e exist ,A` development pment standards of each plan. The amendments contain Lfie design standards which staff believes are essential `for continuation „of the design concepts- of the FSP, The amendments” contain the following provisions; 1. Activities Centers; The activity center concept is continued or e o ow ng ritersectta -rs a. haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard b. Future Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Because of its current significance in the comunte , Haven t Avenue intersection warrants an Activity Center designation. ` But, because two Of the Corners are fully developed and the northeast corner plan is approved, it is reco4mnded that only the activity Center improvements;within the public right-of-way,, apply to this intersection. This 'limited application of design . ITEM R . PLANNING CCWISS10N STAFF REPORT RE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DESIGN STANDARDS April 27, 1988 Page .2 r L _ standards permit the Haven Avenue intersection to exhibit; mny of the significant activity center femtures, such as em; *ached roadway and sidewalk paving, .,special. ^street, furniture,, and a formal double row of street trees. In addition, this intersection` would form the southerly approach to the suburban residential part of the City and the southerly approach td the Haven Overlay District. As a result, staff believes the development on t'te southwest corner should work in concert with the existing Barton P1L� as an entry into the overlay district. An awdwt to that" ISP, Overlay District is recommended to insure a similar site design rnncept Exhibit 0841. The future significance of Miillik "M Avenurt 3�est�ies the Activity Center designation and amen m�e`nts to the�G and ;Sp to incorporate Activity Center design standards is point. Oft feature of tike Milliken Avenue intersection whifth should set apart fM' other$ is -its present state of undevelopment. The F- used existing structuras along the Corr #doe as "ts°chitectural determinants" *p, `3skablish an intended character for each activity cenC4. Theiofore, staff believes ap architectural character should be established for this yet �,o ke developed intersection to -aide in an unified design tFAO-g." Because �e southr sib of Foothill Boulevard in this ' area . is primarily developt in a contemporary interratiohal/high -tech e, it is suggfsteel that this style be cont irr .qn aTl t._- o`lr ers Of the Nil liken loersection. N Provisions have been i'n:lude(I which wil.'t s, tablish a edeArian scale for all building features on the.ilower levels, while allowing for mid -rise development in a sto �_back building form. ", The intersections of Rochester Avenue anQ 06Y Creek Boulvard were also considered for incItMon into thipse amen tnts. But, because of their close proximity to the future regional ;mall' site, it was felt that the planning Of this part of Foothill Boulevard should wait until detailed development plan'-for the mall are initiated. 2,. Suburban .Parkway: The properties between '60, activity centers an eas er y boundary of the I'SP and VIR will follow FSP suburban parkway standards. The Bev Kant of the Suburban Parkway standards was Suiden,�by similar.dl� resulted sign concepts which An, the ISP anT- TVPC strel,tscape Therefore, the standards are very �� sipmiltr provisions, and. the FSP ,. Provisions are included to c0titnuity along the k0evard. PLANNING COMMISSION MFF REPORT RE: 'FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DESIGN STANDARDS April 27, 1988 Page S III.. RECOMM M ATION: Staff recomands that the Planning, CoKmission .. review a proposed rog lations and ,make eomments to t - appropriateness of this p=sai and direct stdff 'U schedule t _ ing " public,hear for their forial review. Tles uily %t f er n ner SB:AW:ko Attachments: Exhibit W - 1SP/TVPC amendments Exhibit "B" - ISP, Haven Overlay District hmendment t, - c; `iND-USTR Ah AREA SPECIFIC�P AN (ISP)pAKEkD ENT FOR FOOTHILL FDULEYF,W � �\ iERRIA VISTA PLANN� ilt kiN Y (TVPC) AMENDKERT FOR FY irH !.I_ 9DIi� Ylfkl$ „h' ” f On Septepber i6, 1' 987, C� council approved ~ eq Foothill Boulevard Specific, Plan (F$Pi the .. s , acied to jw vidd a unified development f g�► ! scheme far the poothill Rou eva iaordur fihrou tYta csonunity. Of prime importance in trie plan is t s T� l ,streetscape : design provision 0 "tie" together the visual aspects thiinaiorS,coaenercial 'r oadw$yr i} The p6r^ on of -Foothill Boulivirck tw"O.. Hav+ert` Avenue ar4, the 1415. FOe was not a part of the specific Trlaft Judy and therefore its p•�visioos id na% apply,, to :fine deveiapatec�t. of this s Lion. At''fihe tune, of P �r,r} sv 1, e Plannfhg Compission� and City ,Council pressed a desize to in ,{ode significant, design provisions of the, -p]a�n iii development of the" section.. This amendment the Industrial `Aria " S� ecif'ic Plan WiWer�rC, Vista �ntaoc� CoMnunity (TVPCl Is proposed to includ specific Stre %I-a design pexi��*n¢�. of the FSP in the develo P pion#, bf proper er pies adjacent to`IFoothill Boulevtt d. -_'-_Q," The following PraYis3ons =wi11 apply 'to all cl opertids DoAering Footh Boulevard within the ISP /TVPC Wfiiblt This amend n "augments the development regu,ations and, standards of tha ISP /'Pri'P?�, �thhen ats issue, condition; oh situation occurs whi0h is °not toveNed r � vided far in this " amend:-14nt or other portfodt of the0 ISP /TV'PC, the regulations, of 'the Development Code of the City of R4&ho 'i:ucaWnga that are most applicable, to the issue, col i't�oh, qr situation shall apply. T. OVERALL TATEMENT To create a dyn is cj "ncourse that., � t y R I i s at�`racti ivena c g qua Y_ with a "unit in n V design tmc*, reflective of com rtity heritjige and iusntity, prov`di#g an eco►Tionlicai`iy Liable settinV -for 'a balanced mixture of cd6jg6rcial rand_, net dential uses witkp s��n, effitie !gt,xcircuiation.and.actess.. tr, °11. COMMUNITY DESIGNr r� A. �G�oaJT Create -a cdmmunif4 image ,that expresses and enhaaces the un ; n i vgq'ie character and 1.4 j � of Cucae nga. B. Ob �!fiivest ' parelcp a streeU cape. system ithich reinforces 'ghe existing suhurbanparkways as vehicular areas and desfqnat�s�major street 101'rsections as pedestrian 2.tiuity ;-,Hier nodes thaoughout. her cRrrfv`Qt`. ,.;, rJ MISIT A yr , "ftffli building elevations which provide transition nip At,, ' 'estr an areas to `higher elevakiohs while rotevctigg w a�.�`oining residential neighborhoods. * Promato 'cont porary landscape treatments throul"out the coeri&v. particularly those that are °maintenance, drought resistant, and :Jblot to withstar;d hi,1 �o 9h rind 4ra ditiams and ,,,r intense urban conditions. * !Provide for vhe hli*!;ation of uisually objectionable views such as ssu door` °s'orage, and loading aWeaa thrau2h the use of .do6ign guidell des. C. Poles * De�relc�, consistent straetscape and archf4c ural� palettes Which are sensiltq to treating a "heritagfaA =st topont for .Foothill ticuievardr. * Require cool3ahce with :o�laelIty si�t�- 91i1�61Yi>ses in puns for now- devol'opment, *�pao$foa or redxvd1-o 1 6di hake co snIty ° I dsiryn a,, IAa;r consfieieratian iar .• site'' iah'vview and approval, 7 Utilfzct larscape Materials,lish dre Clean, safl•, wind resistbnt and relatively low inter 1106. Formal forte, configurations should be utilizad`,M activity cefLer nodes while f4rM01,1 suburban type t,conffga rations should be util ized F� ., elrnughaut tie pttrl"wo, links ih between, t; * Oes4gnate special landscape ar* architepturai f +eatures at major intersection locations, t' }:combining " tkwtie. plantings pith contemporary Architectural statements designed to pro= ' a rt distin6tive character,, for the acti;'gty cendsrs. Changes in paving *terials, lighting, signing; and siting of adjacent stru�tur s should occur at major intersectioels > to enhance their, disiinetiveness. ; 111 - DESIGN ,PROVISION5 A. Activity Center: Ac -tivity Centers are- points of intersection at Ago- s ree- `a ong thi Foothill Boulevard Corridor. -- As such, they a Pei 's of concentrated aetivity which qiVeL identity to the areas in which tky are loc#�eC The Activity Centers looted Ontigueus to the .Foothill Soul yard Corridoe within the f!WjTdPC are as follows: r Foothill B Haven tExhibit "A -1, ") Foothill 0 Milliken tExhibit "A -211) I _f n� Because titres cornersl'" t4f. Herren Avenud ipterspct�'or are tither a pleted or under d� elop, At, IM, - dsveto ent. lrovisions of t��� , tivity Center ; IIm. ted',. to the stroetsca�pe and;' tandsdape iwrov nts. 144, .of tC6 - stapdarfs therefores,�apprly only to .the �• t�illikeNc,ivitsy Center and ar; ;la ,Hated, Streetscape -' a. 'All building orientations twill relate to the,`footh 11 6) Soule and frontage .as arch :as,.p acticable. The building setback areas will 'be nriched ;podestrien Zones, with special Jftrdscape materials, formal landscape arrang nts, And pedestrian 1exeLlianting E lxit mtl�� "i. ' fl etscape olewarlts :,sueh, � boilaft., o�swalks, and �. rest furnittd should ��5 c4raCter f simi lar to the . € acti` cenr�s design' ,yle `andsw arer..e., ek `� high clt, aZea0, etc. , r The concept :w'ihtn theyetiviicenter is `!a,ncgrparate a formal, tigularly s,lcedt et trsae $ystem utilizing an inforaaalTy shapod,- colgfitl .true palette., d. ,Te activity centar/interseotion7c ncept ttrbar;,sretsfpc oesign shall extend the 'full length • of tht` d2sigr� !an priarit` 'areat along the Poothpl. Boulevard. frontage. i t the cross streets, thi design shall extend atdjea5t as eta ' as the: first drii6q - north. sod . =soutke -d!9 the c ss sets. The` - ex�,tent at ­` ;tom U6an � steestscalia ��ay be modified throngs �� he design r�;vi'ew Pro;ess _� order� he adjust for lo.41 publ;c right-Of way c0441ti6ns attcs ensu a F3 logical :rali"fn nt of similar features on opposing side of 'thei street.'' Planning > a. At activity centers place the buii: —ing At or a scen' tq .1j front setback Line to create more appealing, aciv�, s�tree�scspe. Front yard areas= with parking lots dosoina�ing' L_- the street scene are specifx� ally prohid�ite�.� �'t�317rken� Y-1 JJ ' b.. In the case of'multi- storied buildin s, hat they relate to the , edestrian. g ground `m rtant P ,�1Y grou�ld ;�.tory �Z�ci�des. .hall be designed to relate to the human sca4. This callrbe accomplished through - biPaking the facade into bays andi'the signage brogghb`down ,kn size and location, Further, his °= (( ,. EYlilBll''A �- ., . . d fan fin° acme cdi be esta fished thraugh the US4 ,d - - pedestrian arcades and awnings :which add horizontal articulation to facades? (Milliken only) c. Qesig4 'bui'ldings to be visually connected, ­n Orden to eliminate a fragmented strip .commercial appearance, Vfilli*�en only) d. Architectur,-- and outdoor space along foothill Soulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the i�. pedastri4n experience. The experience should be visually diversestimulatings amrd4 include activities that create a 'Pte Wvariety and interest, (Mflliken only) 0. Site''iruildings to ereatio :nom pedestrian spaces tt�t cool aept ..and exp*nd the existing 'ptdestrian rights *of -way along 'Foothill 'Boulevard. This is-,acco*rltshed by Creating plazbs end allowing wider: sidewalks on the boulevard. f. Site and d'asip buildings - to iinisize p0astrfamn /vehicle - conflicts, and ovoid locating 4riveways and. service areas which interfere with the .mFlow, of boulevard pedest cars:, movements. , gP Site and design structures to facilitate public Across across sues there iapartant pedestrian connectio�.?s.,occur. h. prientlscreen all 4ut�i related, facilities {i.e.,; c,Mrking bays; storage, a�tG. =i frunm p ublis view. i. ;Building entrances shall _ be orientand to%ards foofhi)l Boulevard as much as possiblf. 3. ArchitecturarConcept a, A diversity of architectural styles are alloweC within the y= Foothill Boulevard area rather than one specific . style, in a!, effort. to promote a richness of architectural claraeter. u b. A spec��fic archi'ttaral style i5 to be foltaraed ai Milliken Activity Center to provide continuity of design within the intersection. The following style has been designated: INTERMATIOWHI -TECH - Characterizad by flat roof tops, smooth and uniform wall surface, large' expanse of windows, and projecting or cantilevered balconies and upper,. floor: ,. Contemporary "{ii -Tech" variations are strongly encouraged 0 with use of color panels and enhancement "detaiiin� around ,. win:ow and entry frames. r EX MIIT A � .k Multiple storied buildings heated near the front setback— line st.auld exhibit a "step4ack", "stair -step" form at the Tour level, facing Foothill Bouievaro'a -lid Nil II ken, Avenue, 4. i.andsct ncept - The Activity Centers wil distinguis►� fro* suburban pllrkwax area by'the use of forsaatl n kin oriented tree plantings. These fp- .1 tree plantings will border ill activity r centers and will' One these areL� as beinj higher, intensity orb =anted d s Y ts, The Oantings Vill consist of offset eau Ta t4 of -tra"-rtle- :trees along ea 'iti rood frontage. B. Suburban!' parkvr s It is' recogni`xed that the, Foothill Boulevard or- OT 0o become a predominately pedestrian enviranmant, ` 'r Therefore; the activity - centem, ,will be 'linked#.igether , by "suburban parkway" tansitfian dress. 911 � 7 i. Streetscatpe N -1 a. The .parkways will be designed 'With' informal clustelhs of ' tress and 011ing turf bets with ae*gdering %undulasttng sidetalks which evoke pastoral, suburban oriented qualities. 4'.. 5treetscape elements such as light standards and street furnf, urat shall be„ identical in style and finish to those '}used. in the fsp, area. c. Io order,to nretvtdl-lr k gradual transition from uk4ban oriented activity` center 1-h-6 a suburban oriented parkw0s "parkway transitions sill be introduced along the corridor. Parkway transitions area designed to tranOtion formal ?bardscape +` elenpents found with the activity 'centers into informal landscape statements whfch incorporate rollingQ turf;berips, meinderingglunduliting -sidewalks;_ and irforepal tree plantings• Sptwificaliy, the'. parkeaV tr nsitioet ?s characferized by a 75- food`. �transitdon zone, d6mina4 r %* i' Flowering Plum accent treeso Refer to Exhibit "Ay 2. -. .5i -te Planning a. Along the suburban parkwayt it is encourage' to place U buil-dings on the forty -five, font t45'i front setback line and avoid large sections of parking lot frontagas at the, setback line, b, In situations where buildings, are highly - visibler`isa the ° 1 r side streets and/or adjacent parking areas, blank, w lis shell be prohibited„ and- speciii eptphasis placed "'On creating architectural inttrest. Offill r A 1 c. 'titili � the concept of "tuck urderx parkifig I screen >rking , frost roothi3l Boulevard or from an other site trees. 3. Architectural: Concept - The architectural charact�,yi:'ics shall 'be governed 4 existing standards of the gevela` n ode and 4. Landscape Concept The :p ntings wily consist of < 1aforR4 iirreat cnts� dostinated by L n plane, California Sycamore ak Purplo P1uo tracts. / „ o C. General Buidejines Parking Lots ��e .fit. "never possible, locate"'sitegontr #es on,., side'- streets ,.in order to minimize pe estri�11��ft,ehicular conflicts.. When this i nark possible, design tine foothill Boulev4r+ia i >> entry -pith appropriately patterned c9nerete otR pavers ;behind publ lc right- of=way9 to differediate it fry the $td elks: b. 'Parking access point , Low located =on Foothill Boulevard � qr side', streots,Gshqld �:o located as far as possible from- street fntersectioft 1 c. Design iirkirg areas so fihp:) pe &.strians -talk° parallel to . ing vdhicl+ s., inistize,' he need for the `pedestrian to c +cis parking aisle , d: Lank individual ;project parking areas with onNsite driveways which are early identifjed-, and. , easily as connectors. New development projects shall delineate, on il submittal, riJaas where vehicmlar'�Or iectian to adjacent site .are locate e. The applicant st =also demonstrate provisions for, access easeaknt for suchkkvehitular Movements to adjacent i` properties consistent with a6 approved aster -plan. l/ e. As° condition of app r a1, the app?:icant��-Aay be required to { comhine parking facia i `es and acoss to serve more than one s�} individual projecti)Z f. taitnin suburban p(rkways, cr sting areas should be designed in'a manner which links the building to the street xidewalk system, as an extension of the),.pedestrian environment.. -this {, cad, tug accomplished' by Usi�jg "desigli fi'tures s h as wal 4ways with enhanced paving, trel ti s1 structures, pd/or X .1 aildscape t.reataients. , J�EiIBiT A G 1 \ \\ -19 t7 a. All. poles,, rarest.. furniture`, light standards and similar , thar4ware withfw tern feet (101) -of tk Oublis rfght•af -way shall be painted- a color chosebi as the Foothill Corridor �I� Color;.: szIr r' ;faces :may' vain, and +Mich related rchitecture, b. fstabiish �a fUl. ° landscape edge at tease of bu €ldings. A -edge's at the, base of structures is prohibited. Rant ma}tar €als in Conoiners are' approprie�. t� landscaping should iesult in'a list, profile' image. i.e „� .use.. of blade grass in_latm Area;, 0446py, 'Oem\in parking use of hedges, and lose wail`s to scan write areas. d. 15 6rnal pedestrian systems, llnklrcg office ,cc loxes Frith- ' a neighboring c4ywerci4l or office develop"Ots, ist4uld, be located close to buildings and ba► part €ally tovered, e. Alan£tn:Jr clustcer$ should assume a Eton- unifor , arr4o9mat. ,, The ditrertity of, **$s €ng tYpes Should be great enough to, provide interest, t kept, to a level which evokes a`' relaxed, tatural ?eating to the observer. f: hater conserving irr €gation 1syste shall be used €tt all public and priVate landscaping. g: Add large (15 gal. to 24'; box) canopy areas to existing . landscapes consistent with.dity standards.. 3. Streetscape �3ghting a. It is the intent;;of streetscape l €ghting t4 add a } consistent, planned loop for Foothill ulevard during daylight and evening hours. Lighting cart have a dramtic� -affect, an the qualf, of strentscape design, b-,, All .lijhtfari � tuees in t1w publi�.right -of -way, s�ha I be' cQnn €tent and approved by tha C�i�ty n giireer following the reco> tadations of the rra, ong Coraission., Materials should be consistent” and in keeping with the desired theme. Luminaries, pbl+es aW support €ng <shardware should also be consistent! i =.s C.- Ail development areas:butside the public -right -a ilhal l use high pressure sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confided to the limits of the building J � ] �� s ` Adjacent to Exist- ing or Planned COwergiaa Dev. O'ice} `. Interior Size o v Property. Unez - Adjacent to Exist- ;< a ing or Plann _ itESiPteritfai$�/. *} %j 25'4 AdJacent to Exist- 4 i ing or Planned y' yam., Commirvial Bev. 5'N. Q) t *} Refer to ISP /TVPC for regulations in sub•.arban parkAy area. R`• 4l iilifutions+, �ctiYity Centers* tithin 50' of xtr et yard curb fees" ' n - Within 1000, of a single family residential distric 25' �TC�rers,' aniles, rotundas M Refer to I'SP /l`dPC regu�at on$ for the suburban, park^ areas. t k� Wp i igy ° Xb1 M1 r 9 r� ut IlkzR / all cc KR- IL IA Q 3VV i ' v't» wow x r� r J { pA4p91Y'Prl•or �� �,y� ...° �_ '�%+^�, 'I� ,� 1. t". r�i"q. . ,� ✓ .�".A;i�- . ^'. n R t i♦ YT aN, ♦ F M iF i Y 1 �R�\. 1, �. «a .r. r,.r rwrr1� is�� �- -`- iwrhX7' 1}�4aWA71M�'1rIDY'.f r,.a•n 1 K.vrr7 t PARKWAY TRAM SITION OMa j o VIM o ti I;'.s Part IV, Haven over?ayr, District, Section D sha19 be„ amiMed to �%cV4de the following: - �4 Building placement at or rear {4be .streetscape builAing� se'tp k is strongly encouraged vdithin nit, develo,pp� eits, particularly "on -corne i 'tots with hi visibility The bleilding oriontxtion ow= the ,iouthue� corm oil €oothill ,. Boulevard snit Haven shall bye c'p or*bl"* b1W tM t of the- buil41ng oq ltt st to earner. cnante e',unif%d "try stmtwnt ,=" an Haven Ave frW foothill Bo[itavard 'Jgt4 tlae ;Tien 'Merlsf 'Dist st: Multiple building planeeent should pra41#g veriab k,� treetscap0 ! , setbacks to reduca stria*av atony. ISP, 'Part IV Subarea 7, Special`' Consideration section sh4]1 he mended -to incl►tde the folioving: u For grot$eB !daring. Fo171 Haulevard, , refer I design# erp1 uiti prolOiSians' li3ted tip tl*r. "ISP F nt 1� for Ft3't"iralo�tard. t1!, l°°r e \� i Y 0 r EXHIOIT B t c �� �S r1 CITY OF RANCHQ,CUC AM0NGA ._ ';STAPP REPORT c a DATE: April' 27, 1988 TO: Chairman and NP:mbers of the Planning Commission 1977 FROM: B' ad Bulltir,.(ility Rl nner. BY: Scott Murphy„ Associate Planner k, SUBJECT: HORSE�CARTS /BUGGIES ON THE TRAILS SYSTEM I. BACKGROUND: EarMr this year, complaints were received by the ng neer ng DivisioA regarding the inability of horse carts/buggies to use the Demens Channel Regional Trail diWto n:xwr improvements that were installed. Following the receipt of:tnese complaints, th Engineering Division anductedr a field survey arid' verified than the eprovements that had been installed were in accordance with applicable ��Ity trail standards (see_Exhibitv,:4ff and "B"), II. ANALYSIS In rFlrfewing the 'possibility of providing for carts/buggy use, s ff has.:- •notod that non-standard, devices would have to be installed and exten -ive regrading and 'elandscapfag would be necessary in some areas. FuC-�krer, it may be difficult to develop trail standards to accommodate horse carts and buggfet' because of the wide range of types and sizes,. V4, ff feels that this is not in.line y1th current. City policy and that.`odditional policy direction is necessary, The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed this issue at, their March 16, 1988 meeting wind recommended;, that provisions be made for the ;9se of horse marts/buggies on the Regional Tr®l System. cjhe Committee reviewed numerous options including whether Community Trails should also have provisions for horse cart/buggy use. They also explored various options for securing and monitoring trail use by catts/buggies. Before exploring the various methods for trail control it was determined that a policy direction from the Commission was necessary: II, REC"ENDATIONr Staff recommends that the Planning Commission provide po cy reclTon to staff regarding the use of horse carts /buggies an the trafls" system and, if this use is desirable , instruct staff to review City standards and the physical impacts on existing facilities and rkiport back to the Trails Advisory Committee and Plannfing Commission. Re full � - d, B d _Bu er Cit an BB: ae Attachments: Exhihit "A° - Memorandum from,City Engineer. (February 29, 1988) Exhibit "B" - Memoranuum from, Maintenance' supervisor (January 21, 1988) ITEM <-S,, , ;r FDATE: CITY D ? {a cuoi IO�1la �tCSOP ruary.24y 1888 Q d 86ul ler. Ci tyr Planner �\ y S �y5(�l�iiL,J- 7 _- FR{it�i; gussell H. Maguire, city Engineer CIF1'aFnAn 0q�CAAICN ptgrra�r: trsst;t $OBJECT: T,,-ail System ldorse'"Cart�lBuggtes" Ali Originally Commissioner ChitieA referred a Plaint t8 •aii�d �a�er r : talked directlY to that person, regarding r concerns '. . (Ms, vici~i ( Jackson 987-1430)., BaSicallY„ hir aplainF ..as `that with the new work we hrd recently completed along the Demens Chan al Trails, ,She could no longer, drive her horse cart/buggy alcnglthat; ficilities_;because _cf the control barriers at the entrances. that of this, I asked, P,oh zetterberg to provide' a tjst'of the Mork hat we had comEzletecd and to double- che-ck At .for comtaliance 'with t applicable City Standards. Bcsta'.s, arrdurs is attached and iddioates drat Mork and also that the work'aldti the hOrseatrai is in actorciance With appli able City Standardt. F have to this in order to provide for hors carts/buggies, we would k have to inStall non- stand4rd.devi}es and, in Ad�ition, do see .extensive grading awl' landscaping tnodificatiorts in some, areas, X de not believe that this would be in accordance with current MY Policy and have concluded that Policy direction is needed. Therefore, at yaurr eariiest conAnience, I warsld aPpreeiate your taking this matter through the Trail_ rV. ittee and on to the t'3 nning Commission for a policy disc=siwn "�,sgardinq horse cartslbuggie',i' an the trail makes t. Should the Pianniho Commission wick to consider a pokicy which masses provisions fear^ horse tarWbuggies, it _ ;Aould- be referred back to staff with directions to }et,iew not onlyitY Standards but ai5o the physital impacts on the existing facilities.3 RHM:dlw Attachments J^C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi12QN0A \� MEMORANDUM DATA:- , January 21j ls�lP , TO. r 's ell a. �C\ /„ agu re, City sngineer ;1 7 FROhr` Iiob Zett'szbarrk Maint, Sins eets Storm praei�ts� v. SUBJECT, HorsotrAJ24 0. t�e,sens .- \ fn r-tspai %— ; to your i,Y i'r l y mtasur Abe bP��tings dnd the d stance$ the ween�eea�ChAKtii�� width between file saalktbrouOh Poata ;pare fauzct to +be�l8� �clTh between each pant as tr.,thO C*tY Standards #1006 & #2007. The following U704 rundown o the work, done on thy! Hors2fi; a3iz �� Demons Channel Corner -of an and Hili ads A. Gate was narrowed ' 41 to make o the g:7te 121 vide' , H• Walk hrough area cheated by removing racks and u trsin�ting trees {prier to this therm was 'to w&lkthrough area}. C. Posts insta] -Iea on the bike between ea- {t path se t at 24 u clear Pst to sop trucks and motorcycles. 2- Southwest corned of ser and Hills ide A• 8orsetrail received no walkthroutjfi clue to the ¢a t. c the trail is blocked oft at the are stem, H- dike Seth Posts r" I \_ pik , Posts at, 2+4 clear lsetr�een each • '` Northeast eorner of Wilsonr d Car.o gTian Rorge4 rail wm kthr0u Xis t44 g > Was constructed next to the gate several trees were trimmed and same ahru!)3x were removed to make a safe U horsic3. path foe the �r bike gatkt` received posts at 24" clean between.° j each post, �.v 4 _ `Il Horsetrails an bemez s (% °age 2 i 4.. Westside of carnelian' A5, 61$lkthrough pasts were insta l,sd 18" clear }�erweer, each ,post Frith no modifir ition to � =tht; M�ejst3,nq gate. P The bike path received posts &t124 cletak thbtwean, i each post, 4190 240 ports were insta�'Isd io block vehicl ,O� a ctesW to the 3 oganingc, S. Northeaat-cornet of Sapphire and klanyan ? n , A- 9xisting ho ail '�at� narrow&►. by 3.4 to make, r ;'Z' gate and help create a walkthrough area: POSts were inetailod at 78 ".:aapsart. 'Treeet haft to be trimmed and son' subs" rtmovec3. = .2. The big* path received posts at 24 -" clear between each post. M G. We also installed a - ,aGt 12 gat A�r the community trail system... 64 the southwest corner of Barya� Sapphire A� The horsetrail rec4 ved "t�sets ` posts at 1p, c a° eet� each post and some trees trimmed. S. The Spike path received posts at 24,, cleJAr between each post, /la 4. cc n;.+,e Hleains, Maint:,' Superii"nden,t n I Tji 1rY,. - J a r " , `¢OenMslta 6ewen: R+++tate- YIBAt $AN 9ERN*T1rV1 :9 no • CUGAN011i.A. td l7 1. qlj; 6;l8 • np sd-'S sda �'. + ?1A 9117.vsot J GHAltLt$ A. Wit' CJsO A. ki1DND LL R013EPT NEUM 0. NVIE K N v t April 26, 1988. City of Rancho Cuca-monga. Engineering Department, P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91.730 ' Attention: Betty Miller t Res Tentative'Parcel Map 11044" Owe " Gentlemen: --Due to time'constraints in addressing the staff reports that were received April 25, 1980, an associated mit1gating conditiflns with the property owner, the Dist itit hereby requests:.that you reschedule our tentative parcel map - application from tYhe April 27 1988, Planning.Commisaibn Meeting, to the next scheduled planning Comji,s sion Meetiizq, J "T If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the undersigned, r Yours truly, ' 'ti > CUCAMONGA CQU y Dr .'Jamu's H Cline, ! � I Engineering Depa tment Supervisor J JEiC:b a r ,t f CITY OF WQIIO t.ggAMOxGA - DATE: April 27, 198$ ., TO: Chairman and Members of tie P1annjng Commission 1� FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engine BY: Laura Psomas, Landsppe Designer r SUBJECT: Planning Commission Wor � ho p - City 6atc�ray �Sc,ur��nts > This is -to 3n OM r * that, a Planning Commission work4hap =has beery ' sebedoled' far- :?Thursaty, 'Ray 5,. 1988,, fallawinq B,R.C" m_Ming the V -at, Neighborhood Center, -The workshop w €li consist of a_. vie; of de`Yet and City proposals )for the MilIken. Avenue and haven A,cnue GattA 4,Y. ; J/ Monuments. RHM : LP: sd cc: Bekad Buller, City Planner �~ Dan Colman* Senior Planner`' : v F