Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/06/08 - Agenda Packet/0701-02 o 6-8-88 PC Agenda l of 4
ru CgCn'4��r
MY OF
MON
Y a AG'
? 1977 WEI�NESD ky
"c
TAO PiRii' ��*4At iN CENT=
9161 R 14 ;,
R"CI3O COC.dlM'ONGA, CAWOYtN A
L Ple(w of A isncf
It -UGH Cau
Commissioner Blakesley. "Commissioner Bmerick
Commissioner Chttiea. Comanissioner McNiel
ComipWonor Tolstoyl
EL Amumneeme: is
r
May 25' 198a _ I
V. (r'Dnt
.n c
the ' lfowir► CoMSe »t C[tlen �p t« � o ex iected to tss rr �ttiAO and
non�cpretversiui. Whey wftfxk�td ors iry the Cammssfort'at' one-
time wftttAttt discussion. I1�rdP�� ^n�e.��s co6cern oven any item, ft= �
should be �trtoved for discussiot4;` ` '
;� tl. IattYiRC AI�YIENTAii A83rSS�VIEi+t * i {OR I)EVEI.OPRgENT REVIEW 41
8x07 - SitTA N I'f?Q - 'T:veIopment o ,2 acre intrial
Master Plan consisting of t industrial buildings end hp I
n s development consisting of ,s 1,409 sq are foot_ building t a
contractor's office, yard, warehouse usw on 0.5 .acres of .land y
in the General lY�ivatr�el �t�triotn nth 13 of the Industrial
Specific. Plans 1004tedcin theieast side of Rochester Avenue, south,,
of 6th. Street APN: 229-283-03.
YL Fubli�� H
}le ollO fIi items �tre t
f qv y pubttc heaMn fn whf..�lx condeMed Wividuala
! , Malt vofde their opinion of the related pro f�t.- P'iea3s wait tip i e �
reaogtptxed by the Cizatrrran . and ti dress the Ccttnrrk"wlon by stat
( Yom' nom a and address. ti scch o�iaions shall he liMited $0 5 rr incr�
per bulividual; for ikzzch 44v , c
$. E YiIit3l€t�FEI+I *'� z#$$ESShI T wily LtitYi i`Tti}AAL USE
° P Mi'C Ii"Li' E f. RO EC ON DISTJUCT --A,
;, w'queat to the lustaRatiott a a tee tporaryl mom st seture
to serve✓.as a multi p
�aciiity 0 be located in tip iftdium ,
P i3ersity hesideatfal istciat (8-14 dwelling units Per ire), located
at 6627 Amethy ist end APNr 202 - 101 -1.1. Catttinued men
AP 13 1968
Z
C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ` VESTING 'PENS
TRACT 13 0 - ACACIA r A' resident #al subdivision and design
j .r review of4 06 single family lotillon & roxI late{y 40 aer of Is
°
they Low- Medium (4- 9,dwell#ng utit�s r , krel d 14Ied it (8-14
dwelling emits per afire) Res#deneYa: f3istrio ' �a fed :t the' north
; ° 4 side of''HigWAnd< Avenue, sout:1 of Banyen west of beer
• taS$e�t channel.- APNt 20f �k2 and Lot 110%
D. ENVIROVM1�I�lTAL ASSESSMENT ,AND CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT MERCY AM- BULANCE - Ttle,request to establish
sw: mbulnnee sere #se substation Ri A leased space of 2,000 square
f'et within an existing, ttsuit #- tens�t industrial party on 5.22 acres
of in the General Industrial -- nistriGt (Subarea 1 ), located
�• south 4f Arrow Route, on the west side of.V#neyard ,� K: 207 -
j 262 -rig.
H. ENMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ORAL USE
'r �t P ^E�il�tllT $ I PACIFIC PHYSICIAN §g3ac`, H �ftie'�equesi ;La
° estabisst edical Offices In a leased space r;: "1,856 ware feet
within an existing industrial
"on 1.57 acres, of iagnd iri Ybe
Industrial: Park District (Suba 7), located at 1091Z Laurel
�trset - AM 209-351-57.
F irA�`4 O gM11 `NTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE
4 dACH ON - The request to establish a heir salon
,des e ace o ,1 square feet within an exi
\� st#aig multi -
�etraatt iti+tl iM iii park. on 7.63 aeret cif land #n , e Industria: Park
L trlet, lie ad on tae northeast cornef of haven .Avenue and .
aria Street APA1: 209- 401 -01�
VI6L Old
G. �1�lwA'NDA EYkCIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02 - CITY
RANCHO C�UC IMONGA - ,fi regciest to' amend a EtiWanfa
Speed ic` Plait toles ablsh a community; Equestrian Trail on tlt
West side of Easttivenue from a'point roughly 1,400 feet north o�
ghland Avenue to 24th at.
H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMEi7T REVIEW
'DIVE.it IFI - The development o �s, axe° ice,
neighborhood commercial shopping center consis ',hv of two retail
buildings totaling 14,800 .square feet on JM96 acres of Land within
r' an approved shopping tenter In the Neigi:borbood Commercial
District,, located at L'ae northeast )corner of Haven and Highland
Avenues APN 201; 27f-6S and-71. (Continued front May 11,
. , 1988)
VUL NeW Bminew }
L DESIGN' E FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13566=: cARYN - mite
# design re iexr ' i Ming eleXStians gttd detailed site plan of $4
y s ,let °faznilyV lots f prea! %usly approved tentat0i, tract -map
9 „ consist lr of 154 le !rutty lots an 67.85 acres ot'land lit the
LOW Ddrzsity_ lei ntiai istriet (2-4 dw
" , ellitrlj units per acre),
"j aced art tide south side t►f i 4th trea east of Wardman Bullock
load - •.A�Na 2�6- xi1-G2
w
L
OR, DEVP 0P-4 ENT AEVIEW '�87 -61, '' - 4fx3RRIOT
O- RPORATION - An appeal of staff's decision .to deny a
M0d1jfi cation of the building eleutions of an existing .restaurant
;
wi ,i40e < Nei,T33borhood Commercia District located on ttae
northwest corner 'of 19th Street and Carnelian Street - APN. 231-
811 " ad.
G IX.
I1ire -Aw R"Ort
%
K AA,., N;AMEN3}MF.1gT TO `T-ig VMTING TENTATAIV, MAP SECTION
CF THE CITY N ORDINANCE TO, INCLUDE THE
RilGsitLA`TfttN OF NON-RESIDENTIAL SU DIIVISF NS,
Bmthmm
XL
Mae ,Comments
i
This is Liza tfrrae dtt,i place for the general public to address 69
CommUsimu itards . tar bo discussed 3¢ere am those Which pia.. not
already appear an this agenda«
77ae PL -Hnwg i `gm'musion befs adopted Adinin strai ve Rog4lad that
set an 11 p.m.'a4l40nment time. If items 90 beyond that tfine, ttaey
shalt b heard criiy with the consent 4,'the` Commission.
j
Le �
r; J
;0._
z.
}
pt,ANNil% C�1ISSI0M STAFF REPORT"
DeveIopmeejt Review 88:07 Swan 'Pools
dune 8, 1.9118
page 2 .
H. ANALYSIS "_
A. Banc round: The protect (CUP 84-$0? was _prIeviously approved by !
zning Commission on,,- February 23 ((1985K The Condi=tional
<` Use Permit was necessary" at 0ai` time;. because of the,
significant amount of ' office use #n the ,tbexzanine of each,'
buildings an February 15,1;.1987' this p�p3eet expired and
.- subsequently the developer ,z6 ubmittedr,a meW. application for
the same protect:; j
4F `
The level apex ,is requestin9 for an entilrormiental,assessrent 1 av-
the construction: of phase I t4eve700ment consis -i'tiq of a 7,400
square foot bull-ding for .a ,contractors' office
D yard, a .d
d n
warehousing use. Upon approval of a Negave Declaration, the
City Pla ner will grant approval of the pr634ct'based upon the
recommended ,conditions :Of= approval front the, Design., and
Technical Renew Committees.
B. Design Review - Committee The Design Review'Comittee (Mc1(iel,
Toil V, o man rev ewed this projtct on two ocassions
April 21,. 1988 and May 1, 19„8c'i, and recommended approval with
the following. condition-.
c I. The col or of 1Ehl-
PrQof shall be of a subtle shada and
samples shall'' be submitted for Design Review
Committee r New and approval prior to issuance of.
building pev it.
C. Environmental \sesw. .nt: �� SiAff has completed the
Environmental ec, s an ,has determin�`t.�at no significant
adverse impact woulii -�pe_u IL' a result of this oroject. if the
Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaeation would be
appropriate,
III. �RE -OMEND TIaN: Staff reeonmknds issuance of a Negative
Bell artat-lion for Develgfnnt Review 88-07,
(Respect subm , ted,
Brad BU71 v 1
City Planner
Attachments., Exhibit "A" Location Map
Exhibit "8" - Detailed Site plan
Exhibit "C °' - Conceptual Grading
Exhibit "!J" - Conceptual Landscaping
Exhibit ''E° - Elevations
Exhibit "F" -�'F'loor Plan
to :3
Q
(36.
AV-15
Ul
SU B1i-ilRI EIE �
»
i=ti1
i
kr
Ilif i�
N
CIRCULATION
Y,
120' R.O.W,
�
100, R.O.W.
I.' SR' or less R.O.W.
• •
i
aa'
th
RAIL SERVICE
Sobers
- r-s- -r- -�- existing
'-+++ +++ Proposed
TRAILS/ROUTES
Q O Pedestrian
0000 Bicycle
�+
, :•
multti°tisis swib .
Special Streets" pe/
* Landscaping'
.. «:7...:..M. Power Line/
4- Utility Easement
t
Access Points
j
�; aubaree �
NORTH
_ RANCHO .1� AMONGA
"dip
P]�ANMING bI i
TITLE
pS A(
RR
EXHIBIT.
9+Cu�L�.
.
anr.o_ ttetb �'rrawv�ea �
1 tli.1l9K9bi.9�K- +iu:wri.sw .''� t 1
49oee avri.,`
,s -
�
• �F.c..r1s.L c�c a �� � � �d 1``� c _�f � �..,.. � .
L l
ca
�r-
i
,
8
11110 ifs" x j
«►tam; � r— F� � �i�9�,�����I����i
:. iqy�°• �. ♦Mar.• � }��
L; a
RTH
t
CITY O
"RANCHO CUC
Tol
M
a
SDITYO'F
UCAMONPA T'
1 , I IO
EXI
I,
6 ,
IIT. L SCALE:... ..,
a
--�-- `- ---- -- - CITX OF RANCHO CLtCAMONGA
�`STAFF RE
f) ATE dune_8, 1488
,. TO: "ChaiMnan an Mier, of the Planning Comnissi�,
FROM; ,` Brad Buller, City 'Planner, � `s
BY: Cindy ,ilorris, Assistant klantlar
SUBJECT; GON`s2ZT CHAt, RISE PERMIT T37-36 - FGOTHIL FIRE DiSfiI} tT_-,A
reques a s OW a ns• a s on a s emporary mo ulrai
stF4 ^tUre to serve as it' multi-pur ase facility to be
loeatrd in the liedium- Density Residential Oist,:*ict (8 -I4
dwelling units per acre) AtVG627 Amethyst Avenue' w APN:
202 - 101 -I1. `ls
1� - � PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIP
A, °Action Requested: ' Approval of d- 11M.4onstr�tction Conditional LI
se er5n r
Ask
S. Surrounding LandIlse and Zoning:
r
vacant; Residential {844 dwelling
units per acrd)
South - 'Office /ComercialoCenter; Office /Professional
East -� P+ lti- Family Residential; Wi 'ium Density (4�14 °
Willing units perw,ac,re)
West -
Multi Family Residential.; V3dium De itty ResUmIti4l ?i
(8-14 dwe'ilin9 iiRits, per acre) �
G: General Plan Desi 0ati6nse
1�ro, ec te - "T+edi- ty'Resotial (8- 14:defling,.an its
per acre)
North - Medium Density,.;Re'sidentialji( 1,4 duelling, uc►_3ts per
acre)
;
South t- `Office /Professional..
East . - Med %um Density Residential:($ 1� dwelling units per
acre)
West - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dw ling units per
.acre) . „ .
D.-- Site Characteristics: *gect site is 'a. pre -a sting�'non-
con orm nQ s e a h been developed :�itkt an existing
station house„'and an -idK nistrative office building _The
P. roporty to the north is Currently vacantrand�^� the east is a
recently constructed M6,) ipl0 family :proji�ct.
0
r
PLANNING C"ISSIi3h STAFF REPORT
oz's_
Page 2
t' C;` iicable Re uiattons; The Qevelopment Code permits the "'us6f
r l
or tempoavy s ryEures for use as 'interim Offices subject to a
CUP process.
F. parking, g,Calculat ons-
Nober k- � MI, er �'
type' care pas-king Spaces Spaces,
nit' Use 1oCa4e Rti'o '
Rat, iied;� Provi ftl
Office 2 700 1/260 .. 11
Ass ly� _ 594��z 1 %35 17
Total $ .7r r_r
Number, of spaces to be added ;- g
11. dmYSISz " NI
r, A Geh rat• As a result of Code Enforcement a � 4he Ft�� �iZ1
'
re s riot is requesting approval fat- an ex�nt,918
�..
square
- foot modular unit which is located at, thoi.r i7 s=trict faci'iity
on Amethyst Ai6nue. The it
_
u provides an �t ii?tit work 33ut
area as tell as additional ci�assroomia�id
conference spate.' the
arpiicpnt proposes to have tt:e; unit air the site far - period of
`years.*
two at which time station No. 4 should be constrVilk.
The unit is 1o�ated approximately 85 feet from the curb.face
t1d' # ippar tfsi�y- ;screened by an existing four .t4) , foot block
71�e a Jkant,wfll have adequate parsing avoilable,on-
;tee
. pith addition of 8' parking spaces.
8. Cesi/n Review C ittee.'a ll
The project was reviewed by -the Design RQView Camwgtee on June .,
1988 0- outilY E",rick, Chitiea).
The Committee- ,recommended
appro}Cal subject to the followitig co€id #bans:
(1) 'That if Possibli3, tall ,1i—%;- obscuring lardscapingy, s� cFr as
the Ptalian cypress, he 1 t. the
�
rD
ad rear of ti;` ex sty;:
storage units in order to sc een`�*eWs ;iato the site,,,
addition, landscaping should be added" around the sic3 � r4.
to the front of the storage units and should include fast
= U
.g�►awing .evergreen trees and shrubb- in a permanent
'
p�,anto area ,ar large brixocontainers..�
Eft landscaping be added '�74�'1out`least �orn�, of
,tQ< -iihiv
(� site ;tc screen 'viWS f+ "the existing multijfaatily
= 'project to
the eiist. 114 landscaping should °include_.
ct
PLANNING COMMISSI IN °STt+PF CSPORi
CUP 8746 fi'_11re District
3une 8 ,_198$
rowin95:2vergreen trees, planted a minimum of 16, feet
aft" Center, arzd' shxubbe►~f. _ ?1anter wells should be added
around each of 'the trees rotect.- them from sand` -which
may '_be places in thin area.
<� (3) That the 1;'pdscaping with:,, the" front sAback area be
upgraded, cailsistant with Cfty,StandarO to include street
trees, the Jagz6ese Zelk&& Olantee: ' feat center fore
a toil of to! � ree
(4) n addition to street trees, jandscaping.j.zhall ,be added to
the area north "of the, soLq,t:' 1yy drives >ais e, a .astFOU1d
include ��lditiona7 .,.?4 tp('86 ifid box size trees 'for
sc►eeniny= gurposes fast rowingrt, evbr raen 'shxtlbbe r and
appropriate groundcover. Tf, thi!7south -of the drive:- aisle,.
additional finds aping should fie. ad'dad,, adjacent to the
existing wall. The -landocap ng which is iadded for..
G i reeding purposes should `bs <> planted in a , vc* dense
l dFnner.
(6) KAdeck with. -a decorative railing '=sh(Uid b'added "'to ti:e
south and West,,41evatf6ns; of the modul *r unit. In
addition, a trs1lis structure should be added to the west'
ee
eleww n wMt plimbing,vines added for further Scroeni.ng,
(6') potted 1-an4scaping should be added on or adjacent,ta the
deck which should include trees,hhmbs AM climbing *nes.
(7) The trailer should Won si%e for a period not to- excaeu
two years otherwise the, trailer malt.be s4k3ect to 1or..thEr
design a rodi'fications.
(a) The trailer, should be painted to match the .existing
buildings on -site and a darker color bard, be added in('a
manner Similar to; the existing ;trailer.
C. Environmental Review: U,00n "-vfea ef° part_*k of the Initial,
u au_ co!mPie an of Part Ii of the Environmental Checklist
staff., 4is, found no significant environmental Tracts as a
resull.of 'this proNosal.:
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: ?hAt the prapasod use is in accordance;_ -wit,5
4e Hera xn� a o0ectivps ,,df the Dxvelopmefit code, atid the ,,
purposes of the District in which it is located, 4s evidenced by
the Cnnditiona7 'Use, Ptnait prt�visis �: €or a fl► station, YhaiK the
proposed use, together with ;ate conditions applicable Oweto, :Will
not be detrimental to the publir health, safety: er'welf'ara ry'�r
materially. in uric +as_, tp tide properties or improve Ots,Irf, the ,
` mzm6.RANDUM
TO. Board of Directors -
FROM: Training & 0perations`ti 'ti
$UBc7EC s Temporary >rlasbtoom Lease or Purchase < Y'
f' DATE: October 2f 1986
With the reeds of`:An expanded fire safety division movi.ng into
the existing classroom, it htts become.neces.sary for ,staff to
n 1pok for a replacements
several opt orss were fionsi eyed. (1) leasing "apace- in tGjj
industrial area (2) 'using 'existing .c tunity facilitiew, (3)
i obtaining a.,• "modular unit and placing it on nistri^t property..
`r leasing space in the industrial, area prove to<,be toot. ex ensive.
Mcst facilities offered were o n iRtuch to y► urge a scaler for oar
needs or budget, There was little ac
oz for the
parking
o fire apparatus in the smaller facilities.
F7eing existing facilities will do until this' sit- ation'.; is
resolved.. There are often 'sohedu2.ijjg conflicts wl- gthiar' growls
and the security for app
arlktua partied in ihesp , areas is cot
the most desirable.
gbtaining a modular, unfit and lociating it on 'bistict property
seems to be the moat satisfactory approach tc.this problem: sta-
tion I appears to bjr the most sutpable 41a 8- for 'a ciassr" I in: „
multi - company drillsr boazd meeting,%,. meetings with the, develop-
ment community and even ,in- k�s~w��' , physical training would `be
well suited at this location,
_ i
i
Enclosed is a proposed site plan. The need ifrs t his temporary
facility would exist until station IV could be constructed with„
a classroom cn site, This would be approXimately two yoars..
These moi�lar units are.available th ough either lease or outright
purchase. There is no buy ba "rk option.. Enclosed with. `the site
plan are the bids. One written bid is still ffoithc4riirzgr and
fell into the 5600 + range, At this time, staff xe�ommenes,
lease with the lowest bid,. The advantage Of "the iT,0.ae is
if the ongoing ;maintenance protection inolude4 in the lease,
Purchased units are - -un an "as -is" /� as3a.' There: wall, die ,pictures
available for your review at the b rdleGiYrc� -_
i
1
+�
S7
r
I?f)+A7 AVFNUF, P i6
1
2Gr tsAa uoec
�
u Pay 1
ua/t .,
i ass -c i
aLk
r+, 101
KJ. YA3 Aa �r n • rf,
,y�r�^
It
At y
47
►A24449
2
6
Par, 2
�,
I
1'
i�
I OFD
NOOT
ITEM:
CAMONGA
^'. M ?'i
. i J 1• i i
II
1
i` ADMINISTRATION &
STATION S
_a. PROPOSED SITE
AMETHYST AVE. ;
NEW LANUCAPP Q NEW PARKING
hfa' o'N 1**24' 0.04 -)
7f 0 0.^- ---•
30, 0_, 24 0 +. w �I
29!0.3
r � nag ufir "1 ii 34, o, -1a
30' 0'-1'� 25. 0•
ST O` i� ANETNYST 1�
AbMINI5TRATl N
� 45' 0•OFFICE
m ( resat
�A/ANYST ta• 0.
STATIMON 1
20' 0•
95` 0' a
UINtV ut.
NL tai
56 1. J to NS F
ti 4 Nti V
tit�Cw
NWCAP
06 a4N Pi14iKMKi
e {
125' 0•
STORAGE I
BUILDINGS i " j UMPST
PAOPEPTY LINE f a E
I r. 192` 0•
f Ty c,
OF
I ITEANC M..
40 CUC, AA TITLE:
;r EXHIBIT:
_.r ..
_ .. —
I— .....I ADMINISTRATICYii' 3
t— .J STATION Y
I Cc' PRRPOD£D 61TE
AMETHYST AVE,
NEW
9
N�Vf E,gNey,�ma�
PARKING
ft ►9' 0•N f,24` 01-01
t r a•
2w p• 24' d•
S!
_
s t
GAS ro'av
•�si 0 �,
f
37 Q•
6623
AOWNt57RATT3
GOT
4b a'
N
OFFICI
JIMSTH109Y,
sYx�aw �
p,
20. O*bi
010.
r
3B 6"
I
.a
125`
a-
c`f
- NEW E�t/t)��/
Ne
.•
rr
► � r
I'
1
StYgNOW
iIfUlLOiflOi
r a r
i; 8
" PWFURTK
OF
ITEM
AMONGA i M
�'1�MRwwswy�.
E0.PLi
a M yVDI ( SI qqq
t
°' < XHIBIT.,,.Z!_�. GALE: �•.•.•.....:.....s
i!
n
REsow.ION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING tONO,TIONAk,. USE PERMIT "NO. 87 -36 FOR THE
FOOTHILL FIRE OXSTRICT LOCATED NORTH OF 19TH STREET,, EAST
OF AMETHYST IN THE MEDIUM s ?EiiSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
A. Recitals.
(i) a Foothill Fire district has filed an application for the
issuance of the r,. ditianal Used ermit No. 87.36 as describein the title of
this Resolution. 's reinafter i5 is Resolution, the subjec. Conditional Use
Permit request is :thgth red to a; �_the;applicatian "r
(ii) On of dune, 1988, the Planning Co mission the City.
of Rancho Cucamonga �(iucted a .duly,naticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said �eaj ng on that-date.,
A11�06's'i1 prerequisites to the ;
have occurred. lion of this Resolution
G
B. Resolution. � -
t11
NOW � THEREFORE, it is hereby found „ - determined and resolved be
Planning Coasxission of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: ,..
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds thatoail jaf the facts
set forth in the Recit�is,
Pa .A, of thfs.Resvaution at* true and correct.
2.., caked -A1 an su4stantial' evidence presented to this Com�p4 sign
during the above referenced 'public hWj,1n;_,on June S. 1988, including Outten
and oral staff reports, t4`3Other with °� I 0 testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as foi ows
(a) The application applies to property located at„,6627
Amethyst Avenue with a street frontage of 19$.46 feet and lot depth of 229
fee #,and is presently 'mproved with parking lot and a fire station and
(b) The proper�4 =tfie north of the! subject site is Medium•
Density Residential ($ -14 dwel %;,rcnits per acre), the property to the south
of the. site consists of Office /Professional, the property to the east, is
Medium Density Resideaisi Q8-14 dwelling units per acre), and tae property''to
the hest is Medium, Pensity Residential (8 -14 duelling units per acre); and
fc) That there is suffYc ent parking available bn site for the
proposed use.
3„ Based upon the substantial evidence presented-to this Comkission
during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the spe;1MI ind'Ings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this CoimaisSion'erei finds and
�� concludes as 'fellows:
a ;
PLANNIN' coi�insim REsoLUTioN No,�'
CUR 87- 6 - Foothill Fire District
June 8,119$8
Page 2 I
tai -,That the proposed use is in accord with the C°
Gi 8eneral Plfin, the objectives of the Development
Aode, and the purposes of the district in whisk
the site +s located.
(b) That the proposed use, together WO-h the
conditionsiplicable thereto, will n`Z be
detria the public health, safety, or
welfare, ff �,Jtotfirlally injurious � prope n s or iapravea is in the vicinity.
I `��
(c) That lire, prop( ed use complies with ear ;of e
applicable provisions of the Development Code.
4. This Co!mwi4ion hereby finds and certifies they the project has
__beenevfend and considered in compliance with the °Califoreio Environmental
Quality ,Act of 1974 and, further, this Commission bore" issues a Dative
Declaration,
S. Based upon e findings and toncl'asio set forth%in paragraph„
!, 2 and 3 above, this CoWssion hereby approves IOU �a application subject to
each and every condition set forth below and 'the attached' Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein reference,
Planning Division n
1? Restripe the parking lot consistent with City Standards to
provide thk additional 8 spaces needed ort site.
Z) if passible, _tall, view obscuring landscaping, such as the
Italian cypress shall be added td,the rear of the existing
stcrag# units in ordaro to screen views into the site,
3) `In addition, landscapinoL shall be added around the sib -Jand to
the front of the storage units which shalt inclx de festgrowing
evergreen trees and shrubbery in a permanent pienter area or '
large box containers,
4) Landscaping she'll be added. to the soufheas� corner of L the site
Which shall include fastgrowing evergreen trees planted a
minimum Of 15 feet on center and shrubbery. planter yells shall
be added around each Of the trees to pretect them, from sand
Which may bt, placed in this ,ar a.
5) That landscaping within the front setback area shall be upgraded
consistent with City tandards to include stt trees -the u
Japanese Zelkova planted 20 feet oft -.enter for a total 4f 10
trees,
� W
PLANNING COMMISSIOM RESOLUTION NO,
CUP 87.36 - t<oothill Fire District 1
June ' 19$A
3
Page 3
In addition to street trees,. landscaping shall be added to the
area north'of the southerly drive aisle to include additional 24
to 36 inch I)ox size trees for Screening purposes, fastgrowinq�,
evergreen shrubbery and appropriate groundcover. To the iouth
of the drive aisle additional landscaping -shall_ be added
ad$acent to the wall. Landscaping which is added for :cr�ening
purposes shall be p7ante4 in a dense manner.
7) A deck with decorative railing shatll'be added to the south and
u nest elevations of the modular unit. In addition �a trellis
spupture shall be added to the west elevation with climbing
vines added for further screening.
e a
8) Potted landscaping shalt be added on or adjacent to the deck and
should include trees, shrubs and climbing vines. `
9) Revised elevations shall be subject to review and approval 11\1
the City Planner.
101 The trailer shall be painted to match the existing buildings on- {�
site and a darker color band added in a.aanner similar to the j
existing trailer, �s
11) Landscape and i"rigation plans shall be submitted to the City
Planner for review and approval prior flo the 4ssuance of Any
Permits or Within 30 days frost the date of approval. All
landscaping shall be installed within 3 months from the date Of
approval.
123 :,`may atodificatfon, .eximnsion, �OP other change in the use�r�' Qf the
site shalt -require a revision to the Conditional Use P. -ftit.
13) fie 0-A unit shall be removed within 2 years from the date
of a val of this application, subject to extension.- if an
exten
on is requested, the trailer will he subject to further
design ifications.
Engineering Division
1) 4
The . ect is located within a`Floodd(lHazard Zone. --fiaerefore,
fioo± . p The Measures shall be 4:- ,)y1d0d as certified by a
registered Civil rginoer per the 4� y of Rancho Cucamonga
Ordinance No 329 and approved by the City Eaig veer,
Building_& Safet, division
i Provide access for the physically handicapped in accordance with
California Administrative Code, Title 24` .
o'
o
¢n
PLAmshNa G ISSF{ g RESOLUTION N4. }
CUP 87-35 = ,anthill Fire `District
irune 9, 1988
Page
rl 2? Provide state approved plans for installation of the modular
building At this facility.
3) Obtain "permits and in.pections for installation of "the�m6dular
�i bui 70ng.
O. The Doputy Secreiary to th is ''ommission shall certify to the
adoption of this Ret6>tlom
PROVED; W AWPTED THIS iiil'i DAY OF j-URE, 1988.
PLANNING COWJISSION OF _THE CITY 'bF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
OY:
arry T. mcgial rrnan r,
ATTEST: ("
o .13rau
Isul er, Deputy re ax3r
, Brad Bulled, Deputy Secro'4arj of #e Planning Oooisaion of the City- of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certg 'l foregoing °Resolution eras duly and
regularly .introduced, passed, a adopte4 by the Planning Coniston of the
City of Rancho ,Cucamonga, at a regal -ar meeting of the Planning COMISSSon held
on the 8th day of dune,. 3988, by fhe fo lcwipq vote -to -grit
AYES: CGPT�iISSIOa�E
. CSFONERS:
A3EN!': Ct1FM4I�$IIl1€OS:
-
Ali};
.T
-
�_ ssi-, 411 xq- .Ti g
lZ
IV
in v
W T
gyp' tl «�� iii
S .,..
_ ~- ,¢
id 1
�bywa
3
- 11 !X
7CI art
IB
i
w
4131H � 1
w
»
M
All
Uri �.+_ �
fill
0
room
WHIT
µ. «L' '� .+W IT
Alftv-
If
Ti
Q t r =2 � a. R_ $'� ' mss _ : v. -1.8
e,.i K �6
His .. .:+`n. puP �'b �[ ♦l� '�s Y�g�
,a
i "All If
L 16
t °�•4a..': �i e" 1. w' �..
- $ a`• w" .,s,, Vr K a
kj
yL
a -a PM.AYl:. ^ y. 'iwnNa — P.ur OM
�[ twiG
All
KAZ
I 3
M +� a
€� Np ar m A6 = L • �i isWi
is
°
kYy -Are �j t A ss N i
! fit
azz vs,
' a A 17 s_';_. 7�
ou
�, i�c I ^gib
p X71 wPr �, @ Ow•a�!R !. @ a,�
��.�Qyi e =l!.._ t•j,�z,E.__c ■pN 2i s+�i a�i.
• }� +�cn a pypp S�4 q ((p�� . ^pC�.�4 �. ."~ ' w w ^��p+ 1 �Y Q y ��
ps _ 6y
uO�
Y V Z "Out �p
t� )
) c
`s.s w�i1#�fi« pN.,`is'
�I I i[ - N .
'rocs, oavnw Ll- C= to
Y', 4a$�
;;'Ti
^V4 j AC C tL CVRY
C � � 4 cif 'af Q' . �- G(C. -s 6 arS.0 � ~ ■ i�:�
O vp t�
m 1 w,. r q4O� g' r� ° L" f3
J wow u ♦� ugai * r�S twr'&.away ., u ♦„•+ °"C J
a.w ^a ;,t wo °•N•'a �� ts, -
41 u ip`9 �5L'• «YNN �" ��e'N`°o��Z'b�� '�' a .� ,�.. ru °..
�R wN Q�w yl �j `ww NN�Si1.A ►A '�' 1�' bN y�
+w! N X94 y a'V
y,MN.KgN'.y
r, 6A 041111 yl
�y�� � 8.x° ��
wM yap ~aP f1 W104'7 43
6V152 {„�� �M P'SN �6 R M• M w �f q« l�y"� V.'ygm'.�
M N
Qy,..ac�+Z' w4mA'r.^�g ��1..,`n IY9 spa. lgNp a�.
AKf6 rylrL: oM� , �-�_�
Q�NF G:7T- �q♦+�tpp Ls.i}. 77YYC'IyE �.
11 ups pp �y1f,ykk,,, SNt
a'1\1 ._
iry ♦a�^ min a°. CIDS s'wo
ig l
y 9 fq1 �1 Y p¢0 M y
p w '` c'L' a.t 4 a fff re
= U" Wyib : Ui M Y Rey O �i 0. M'C
� A �
y
my
� •_t ?�_ -"', TTP R,V �b „ ply p%w gam. ! _C6
gpN,N bcRWP B LA Y M g64'b Tfa yyW °r �w..C� _IT
y lM u
4.�� R IN - pf ptl 4n A _LM
G1fi CCC .•w LrN6 S 24 VV
3
p f wl NC YT
C b.4s Y •. .' MMM �� i
tai •♦N b au :+♦fig.° �w
y L
W YI♦r 'p Y +O %� wy u�u pY}y�H
D N ,Y C
mw ®1 y
'w �'n a� t°.1 ivi.
(} ■■ ..
x.�$ w a O�LUbw
:r41-3 ts �o AS
eCti 8 e te. i
J' `I+ilN .R °c��t�i.94.. (;,l
-
4 nhiC
Cam. -•. ,�.
�y r
r
q il�
1 !t �� 4 O� +.i,�yl,�' ttpi yam., L Y Wt:: � 6f tl •~ N Q ^"` \n.
r kf a, �¢$jM\ .�CqW O'k�' - n✓�iq -i� �• �w -St
s:.��' �g.� r�_
tiyy N
.915% VN
awo
ZI
lh 8 ,� '. V5aa
rq v ;, �NQ Y7
j4 r' , ICY
Uzi
f ' 110 R { e Ley •w szj! ii L ,C arty figs �9
P r R 4 asaa . � u N �^ s ue^ ��•» °s y1 = ft l�yFAl :✓
a it L�
alla"
bg
4s 3Y s. c
Sic,
fizz
XT a p
T'x S t j
aqz 6 g�s M_�
SIC yME aaw r a
12 u
y�yp w' Ny1+• G
It sit „4,e V �� k+~i r@w� M }w1 _w ��i VS+ �•sh G [k� C;
Y.4 1+ m4M T'" V3 1y V W L
wsi t$' " yy� 'y
O 31,ghn .� t. A a`ss4.
rr�r. w«r w$ Y
s,ayisu4gyV -- yq 4 w�ti• ~,
r"h+
1'�NO U C ♦M "L nN+J, A L �'.O.N L p �0 _11
NVr�p
t _ 7
r v�
PLANUM COMSSIOW STAFF RiPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 139913 " i r�
Soutwr � t� ,.air -1 died Density Residential' O "S dwelling units-
East ?� Flood ntrol /UtilIV canitor. �
test - Low- t3eatum and Medium High density _Residential ,
/The WE acre site'is prOsentl'y vacant and shapes uniformly to
` -the ,southwest at 8 to 6 percent. Vegetation ,or, the site is;
,v1
united to 04tive brash and 'grasses, vitf, anWl life
conxistinq,of rodentx and native birds II
,
IL ANALYSIS. .1 f
A. General : - The`'���applicaint is _ praosing �to develop " ir6 lots
�a
rang tag 3;rt xe front , S,357 to 1S,700 sgcrare feet 'Oth an '
Vt
averags net size; of 7,717 square feet-, four floor: =plans `
are being $roposed Faith each;:hovtog- ;three elevztibns, All of
`
the floor Plans *ill be" Pr vided with thm carjarages. Plan
A is Erovided 3g tides an is 1,605 square feet.'., ;Plant 8 is
Provided 33 times AM i,s_1,900 $quart feet. .Plan 0 i5 provided
49 times and is 2,1352 sgCtsre feet. ,Plan- 0 is p`}�ov ded 45 times
and i; 2,.1 &2 'two
ANk
squarerfieet. All -flaw plans are story exc0t
for Plan
A, which one story.((
On Tway 25 1988, the planning :C '�i s io�t approveQ Genera l Plan
Amendment W'10
A and Develbppe rr istric:Lt Amendment 88 -01
changing the 'area of, the pro3i.+ct sire south of Avenue
from Mediuk to Lew? Medium Otiosity.
At this nweting the' Plannirr oa iesiori voiced thei .c�rrcern
that the Lows Medium Density s itgle Family residential �.ttea be
screened and /orr, buffered froat the Mediurn-[iigh �idential' area
to the west.
3. Traits Advisory Cowwoittee. The Trails Advi "y Conniiitee
MY ewe the pro tic itrt : Aril" 2A, 1988 and, recooWnded, approval.
sub$ect to the following ,conditionb_ n
1. A fifty foot expanded parkway along t31e soUtF side 'iii'
Banyan at the 'east tract boundary should be. provided in
order tv sre easily, accommodate the CoNOUniiyr Trail, and
to provide a'smooth transition from the west tract boundary°
where a parkway of 62 feet "fat its, widest ppofntl has been
provided. P 'the expanded parkway Would also, be consistent
3 tip. with General °Plan policy which calla for the "preser*ttiair
"character" 'the
of open in areas surrounding Chaffey
fol ie9e.
n
PLANNING COK#YSMN STAFF; REPORT
June a 1988,
Page 4
2Y Material sa ples�� "gram �rsplitface# and 'flintstane ";a�
were d4pla if and approved for
tine elevations, -
34 TsWa- by4our�stu o, trtWaround sect►r�d a "r
ows pit all .
elevations. is ��
,well as ., a 2 - x � s elly
tucc billy band" was
provided. Qne ;story madels� were OoOded Frith stucco
detailing around the bay windows, ,sliding doors and windo�es
on the rear arA aide pl vatiarns.. .
Q A perimeter±%aso* rya #1 W4s a7sa 1'ii6brp4rated.
The applicant agreed 9 reed provf i;, Uoother, parkway
transition fron.'L,at ion teftil Avenue to. t multi - family
project to =the Est c►j± .changing the ; location of the
perimeter wall. It was agreed Ahat the rear tall of Lot L
. ;would be inset frorA <the property IIfie approximately 25 f
eet
E aAJ would ietO`rsect the corner side , an
yard wall at
approximate :30 +#agree angle. . Tire same toatmen wilTV be
f
provided on Lot R {across the st ei. from Lot I} in order'
to achieve consistency ,
The Comittee approved `the project with the above
modifications. Huttever, the applicant provided only a 23 'foot
JI
7
f inkway on Banyan which wWWOt, acceptable to the ,Comm! ttee ",
i�hich 'that
in turn! suggested this issue be, forwarded is ,the,
ful -l' Planning Commission for dfsrussian.
j
i
Finally; on Fgay lg, `3988` 09 Co ittii AChit €ea,'' neric9tF
Kroutil) reviewed a revised
i
nyan.Avenue parkway design. The
applicant provided'--o 36 foot expanded parkway for the eastern
portion of . 3ar►yatn AvenU4. ` the Co i ttee then approved' the .
project witWthis �eadifieatian.. "--� -- ,--- ^�-.�-
D. Grading Co+ap►itl " /
The)'project eras d iginaliy mieWd,by the Grading Cowittee on
April la, 1988. At that AF-V, the Co ittee 41d not recoffift"d '
approval due to lack of info ration aitd the a istenCe
of a. sump
condition at It" and "l" 5tredts,
A revised Grading Plan was then Submitted aatd °reviewed with
MembArs of theArading Cointittee and tha applicant on May 5,.
298$, This revised plan was not approved slue to- 1)
inadequate fiat drivable area over"i% storm drain pipe or the
suede yard of Lot 14, 2} substandard cul - &msac on Street %rw,
and,< a} lack of clarity as to the height cf walls and slope
t`
percentages aiitltg Leman Avenue, In a6dition, further
info.mattonI needed fn order to verify that dweilings.on,the
was
r
- .. 8.,... ... �,Irgre +wtrr IrilartY •..✓' r+
�•- !v+ 'Fast
�. Gcwarnw4 ..f +falirf �'.'.°"• ..'
/ 5
F "}r
'
Y;wtMflG bli f �. +wr'.
oS
i MTafW 4Y/iff f
` - (141 tff•1M .. _ �.
A Q �.`
,�' Y ~
F.
'i`
_.� �`
� fib......
wiviaw poor QUAut
y
W �+/r14.reN.� ✓.V4 RNi�IW. � yFI �4~ 6
�� '7/�.
jj� ` \.
„1
Rae.4R..fr ~ f.fr YlYgy ..
swi4D.awir(w
Mawrs..ypy�s <I+YY11rr�yyy{{��yy
Aa j(t
/
M1..ww 4Yarp�4r�slwrw.
!mow
}
-
�- f
CITY OF
L
T
ms tS
,yam - � ?� � � �•.� ♦ �
am
Im
Sao
� -40
A
•,`~� �' i 4w am
o Pon ST
r 1
,i%iF+il. SS
NOM
Crry ii'E.M= C138�t +
V�'"+ii �, EXHIRT= '" Sca "�
tt -
- { U..rerw.. -
t
h �
---
N.,
MY OF MEK
KA
EXH
1_....!
r--- -,
a
0 'Ell
tN
' � t
cl
TY
RANO
UC,► �, 1
, L
I
EXHIMTr-
' (-1 7-P Ix .x �
1
k
a
IFF
4t
aoer- „ --____ ..�
■ if I
_ 1
CI'`�
. C,' '
) }a
t ?
nQ
r�
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNINfv, COMMISSION OR THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAWAGA APPROVIW.• VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 13890 LOCATED SOUTH, OF BANYAN._1-JORTHOF HIGHLAND AND -
NEST OF. DEER CREEK C4, ANNEL IN UE "MCOM AND LOW -MEDIUM
RESIDENTIAL. DISTRICTS. - APH: 201 -271, 13, 14, 13, 34,
41, 42 AND`LOT "O"
A. Reci tat 9; <,
(11: ` Acecia Constructi'tn has filed an app'l;icatioW,for the approval
of Vesting Tentative Tract Mapla, 138,5`/e's described' in the title of this,
Resolution, hlareinafken in th►� Resolt:ti?3n tW)- subiecir Tentative Tract Map;.
request is referred td;as "the app7icait -on ".
l (ii) On the 8th 'of June 1988 the 'Manning Comission of A% ,4''City of
Rancyil1 Cucamonga conducted ,a duly notfted ablic hearing on the `��iplicatign
and concluded said hearing an that date. .
(iii) All legal ,prerequisites to the, of this Resolution'
haee occurred. \\
8. Resolution. 1
NOW, THEREFORE, f -j is he�by found' deterkined and i,*solved by the
Planning Commissitin of t
he-ti ty.,of�l�a.1cho Cu4.amonga as follows:
. • `this C'Omission hereby jspecific4l7y� fin(, 'that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, cf this Resolutioq re true and correct,
tt '
c. Based upon substantial evidence prey::,. 4d t to ,.this Coomission
during fihe'8bove- raferenced public hearing on.jupe 8 11,7 f4cluding written
and oral staff reports, t�gether with public c � �aemissian hereby
specifically finds as follgws:
(a)' The application applies to)�.?perty ,located on the south I
side of Banyan, north df Hirghland with a street f 1060 fleet alonj {
Banyan., and is presently vacant; and , =�
g property () The ra er to �lhtet� ice is vacant an t sltg is Chaffey
College the to he sow d is designated for
the Route 30 Freeway,: the nroparty to.,. the east 'is Geer Creek Channel .and the
property to ttuF. west �y,�designatcd for single tamily :residential in the
northern portion and mul'i- family residential aiongthe 'southern portion.,��
3. Based upon th,. substantial,; evidence prtsented''`to this"Coftission
during the a ve- referenced public hearing and upon -the jecifid'findingsj�f
facts set fo tr'in ,paragraph 1 end 2 above, ixfs CoraaissWon hereby finds Ai,,4
bncludes as follows* = :,
v. 71 V,
PS.AfdEi1�'B`'COt�Ft SZON RE`&OLUTYON NO � r
-- °}!E,SqTR��T3;N7.A'L�C tOCTv13890
Page` � e- a
(4) T *lt '+.entWve tract ?.s ronsisty. t w30h the
�,. e►� rat' PTrri,�_ Devi lo`- :.' .it Code`, a ` ,specific %
d,11%1� car+ �iAprovemetits ,: � ,"the - 'ten'_latfVe
t l t � -`;s OWUtent wit the Ameral Plan,
tin 1qp� nt ; dat, ,arid- #oc fic plans,; and �r
A r
�Ae site- �s p +Vsically i table for the type of .�
6 ZYfllo n\\ p rgposo and
60 le�ipn d 4,O 610division ?s not likely to', l
caOvd substaxial twit oA►aehtal dama, and
a , a i�ia�tle in r� !�f hu► { s:
ant- 1141 e or
tat" ,rK
Te) 'Tiae. ant YVe t► ►`<t n*t, yikely 1,,i cause
seti -iaas puheic heal tb ,probleat (; and
(f j of ft) ntative tra tti vill not''
conflict with any V*a tit" acouxreat by" the
r p.cbl 10 a$ >=irge, now 4F `'rri,cord21 'for GcCM
through otin 'Ui!P of �;0 Projertty %itliin vli
!; .1 proposal subdiwisiu'�t ;�' .
e, Thi>; C6iimi s for ert y e fO l certi fi e that—the project
been` reviewed arld _c6.1 iered in =cnmb ce 4,;th 'th. Ulifornia Eovimm_ -4 'i i
Quality Act =Cif= 1970,4 ;ac a;° iurth ►, th C ai �sia�t aerahy, issues -a Ne gatiNe
>aeclaratLlon n
5: Based -upon the hi dings,api coric'lua9on$ s4,� 'forthiih Tarots t
1, 2 and 3 above, thi- CaaissiOu bee-by &�rpripves' tiie a I l,efi en;: s� t `
each and= every condition set... forth be _ .> �,'1nd �tlt
`^ Conditions ettached hereto and incorporate t?? a�in bj tliis,a^dferen e.
_ Vesting Tentative Tract ,,Map, 13890 r" I
1. An= in lie;t „fee as contribution toy {It!id fut1� .iAQ$ergroundjrjg a
tF� eilsting, overheads l� �a. %sties a e4tr{:cal and
tell "nicatim) locatil : on tine northside a4� �4iyis��tnd avenut'
shad' be �t'atd to the .Cit prior to troproval", the Ihal map”,
The fee shah be one-haxi he c:t� ?opted urt�i<.sa�gount ti
lAe° thou
\ „ IenitiG f,the o$g t fro if�ge. ^.
„
2. `' TnrprOV nts Ito Le o,� Av*Mae ° &hall 'b provtdad to
j� �,sat� fatian of the.`C = E4 1i as` fol laws
;
a. Obtain nPe sary ,ri -way a c
ght hitrrj an �ruL' ' full icitii.
t , ° 'ImproQO-nts Oon - tip east ptoldct baulfary J I'ng, to ..
u , itgtvet4ue`. �� =
4'
bic' i�rleer `:shall tike ,� good% faith effort to - acg4i►T ,
�0, 6 t San Beroardina Court 14M ootr*l
Distrf ai a Cal trans ar<�d
o
f he 4hodld' fai to as the<
' T►.A kl G * F 1155 t RESQLli�t 'NA.
VEST14 IENTATIVE �ACT 12D I'
C n
devela r slt41`l +ConstrUCt retainia wads- at the
11ito,
`. 3.snyrt Street shA11 bw; constructed d�nd, ded� atediscl witn�
in61uding comjar;ity eq�� $triap tejil !
T►ae ", cesso ry dedi ti 0ns sno iMpro)Va is for Hi ghlah -Avenue
shall be provided - V the' OtisiCxlon ;of `'the City Engfne.er• as
fol °]nws:
r'eat itepr0+ral ents 'She 1 ' be, ca str4,•r d opt v the
fry the westj yract ;►�autiaarar . eastiy tsf <<tl
y r r bri eat r Creek Chan a.{ a
b. 1 Va truci a gh4,aid ,left�turO ,jane� at ukvn'AvenueK�, "\
C. The bridge 6'40 Daer,'UCreek Chanhei Id, nq to
G' tcRtiiaat ,�ldth >;., . 5yste s etiala ae }i r 'fees'. #^o� 't:Ke_c £eat
ky be_ cm,dited toward the�`cost of-, struction m so
a(t rove by, '' Ci ty Council x., �� �? ;, �
Corsi ruct c6b v gutter .and = fi So ,h side of
gighland Avonue 'acras 4rcel located mast of the
Deer Creek Channel (Arm. 4
X39 }.` 7.1* ,developer shall
= be eligible to enter ie , alab4rsr nt age;`ment �o �
recover ,"his Bost upon t ,, -1 opment, of sa�1 ,parcel
S. She f6at Sec`ali of the star>r draiA base r�`t `iv thtti Lot .14
,shall bi deteAwAid priorL to flytg [;ap Appraval , to the
satis�f��,rtion df by ity -ft neer base( Ut, Vp telto:,atign of the
r�hl7,✓ � onrttvd with ,TegtaVve Try t' f-3823 located tv�he
\ 6, Sl',Op¢e J,ae�d within` City Iandi6ape• easements along Lemon
- 4i4iie slisl'I be A,N of 3,i and shall be akdscaped to'tlk
Cl- ;at 'sfactiac "of the C ty Engineer
v
%. The ion,':of Na;ster- Plan stom Drain One-No. -be
cens-4vtted from A.eer Creek- Channel to the ',Ogto tractz
bw t a "y. A ebr"{ , basin 4h, 11 6g ° pro4idedc,at ttse:. westerly,
or S o
a herwisg, ap> 6,#vad �'� the' City' 6girleer. The -, �.
r�, nfev cli Me is urr rt'o "hire ,CO�rJ of
(= g�
1Ln''- ttY,:,pew irzty Orifinasice'Nn.5.,
�l
t shall W . protected fray'. iows,_)entarjag he
the norSh f pgerally; h3arn i th3; :pre icalmy 4 '"
a z 1r to t�� sati,,;h on of eer.�
g. prior t '.tial xap'approva%, k, deposit $hall �q posted rvS h ttte
City c t� +nag tide lsi�jp6tfted sest'ofapai^iior�il}S; tli assessment
35- 2,. ionD.,�'= J"�`�reated;;i.
PUANNING C", ISS104 RESOLUTION NO.
VESTIMG TERTATI J ACT 13890
June 8t 1988
10. A star dram' system shall be',�roaided: to convOr flaws /`hoo the_
Lem a1Y tnd:,kighland' Avenues tnte`rsec'iion -.to DeeKCreei✓lsttUnr'e1
The system stralrt be sued ;r� brcoMWodatf the ijlture;, /.le;eXop9 n+
izf the 'pan. Bernardino Wahij flood Conn l- ;.district propert f�� t
e t -
- -h eas.
- � :-
Design Reyiew
;i. The perimet{er` ara11 shat i ^' e 6patible a��t co�s3ster�„ °i�ith��att.
v 11873 to - the i s TPs s sfWl be �4ndicated o.1 the final '
landscape plan whi4.j shoo ire re ;iewedi4nd apprgyed by the ty
t.:
Planner. 't
2. The,rear ra0l of Lot .1 sha'1 l °be ii6t appr.cil ieatety 15 fret fr` "om+
the properly tine and shall intersect the corn ( :r side yard ra1T
at an 40oximat*: -34 degree angle. The sa_treatment st ab
apply to . Lot 52,4,' The ves;�'it� nt tridrguiar . d land edjace,, . td—
the' y+�rb shaliT yP+� annexed into a' landscape_ MaIpUQ ii
District. This son 'be indi�,aW,_on, the f #� 10314ndscape plgn
whizh!sha 1 "be reviewed and approved by the City Pla7mr,
?4 The Eimari Avenue parkway steal l be e*alked feet 4t the
eastern�tract boundary.
4. Architecteiral materlat utilized on frznt ,410_vatiors ,shall be
brick veneer,."�E1in* and granfte sptttace" as
smificdlly approvl�d by .xte esigW Roviet# Co tritfiee. This
tF, ll be ;fated on t4 #inat plans winch sEralil bo reviewed nd
L ; app ved by the City Planner. /�
t.., �i
S. 'Architectural detal"Ung'Aall be providtd on all elevatflonS.�and
shall consitt of the fb1.1'awinfr: two by fours stucco trim around
second. story °wjndow3 6F :fit eie atiors and a two by four stuccc-
*bell,y side 4nu�,'rear Elevatens of tim story models. C
-one story w4el s .,001 -be grovi dep *,J,fih stuaco detailing around
sliding �g, "' ,doors arrd windows ton `the rear; -sand sidg-
eieva -Manx, This shall be noted on fibe°,'fi -1 plans and ieviewed 3.
and. a proVed, by : the C t ia:ESea�.
4
C. The, °-,b,iilder 1 shil"k° construct hose plant 'approved with the
Yetting Tehtative Tract:�Mals'or a building type in substantiai
comp #ante to those plane as app:!oked by the Ryiew% -ry
Caa"i ttee. 4
7,, -=; The Deputy See, tar :ta this' � ssi�n shale_. cer�tif� #o the
a k.ptloft of Oft Resolui�$on.� ,
^ ^' lload' feQdpq exposed to p614c �iew sha lr.be ,tread r ed y th, x air«,
paint a3tr avatar siOvl.° = > _
Lots a�V'�e tsr� the Vkiu� high Raside��ttial pro eot"to the nest
`u" to bq �kr'ee` t f: om it clWith a dense "I nt~ingj ereergreen
v �4� trees ato`�g Yha asfiern sidc of; the .periraE;er, waf This, as, 1
o C p N l "l ® ty
.;aC{•py 0�04�r.��. S.�QM �`AT GM�•rCe d� �Y' .Y Y`Y
, ae4.L:�.e � -r �� ■ga�'Y_"`�s`° g>44 --. - - -
-V. q�CE a� a�6cA
4o Z w Y gx u Y
O _ � �a.V. +tea �w..�1 YVy �N p�� v °� �t ♦iV ��.V ice+ i4 V0r
$'� �i��MQ.y�{` YM!!•'�b '^�MVV fN.�YG � YyT,1�. y4
77Z X-I
V
y� P
p"�"+�yV!s y °P`i•��-a�5 .. RC yew ..l�(¢"yT� "' ye sA S,
goe
- ��4 °�RO LitV'•�� ^> jaM�C� ,��.il i��Y �� i�i79 *��j�.
�BV�:rl � °6 d� �D �iT pp ����. � ��MSV ii� . Y��� • :�w �� '�
• N. a
R
I- All
a}„ .a`,q S 7,M w + �i
��
°_7 e� _
L # _ °. a. b 4w
N w _
Y V Y
y°j$ . � Now fir.• S
MIR
Q Lu .rti =5 im .v Y�«aa
u 3 1
it's
Ab
Ed
yy.
�aoe
4i ,"
_ 4
S
©� J
�� ~�� �.�sal : ��s it a� ^My��NN 1~Vi�btlLF �N • �'EId'Y. Y ..
SrTp,y:
MN }��
i _� $�rc•t`y� JV.,Y•Y �
ZZ
lit
Wig
��"
. /'f' .$ .r8�x - yP'~% 'MM� ±•3 V b 4Ya y�4 ` .r 1'¢l ,'� ,n•$- ',112 N�
g Y
Y
��'ss �ry+ji � A���+�....
KSI. tA'S'.l)r© g r ^Rp Ni�6�
ws l�fv _ el R �r
R M
45p 111
„ ` Z�' : g+ • It y. '
ell ISO
Mjg
jj
ts
II
7wi e v Y� �Ti df4w
YYcY '�:.'�i` -�_9. �4Y ��,K �•. y�'. 'fw."� ���' ,�y@ y6�..�Pe�.� Q��b. �}..
y R JJy +IYL •1mitl�' 4r 6a1.l� V O dam.
tz
4iT,er•jgY Y iah f% Ni
i
do g" �$�' ® ~' ►� ; c g ' '� El 11N°
Mv 24 Jk- fa
:rip
P.
\ pr,iSFgJY18 wiq L..T0 �5Y', +ISIJ Jil ~qp .,�,.wr lY1!4 ^(�•a•y 7. i _
ap
�7
�t 1,
ffi
f�
VN�� �M d �pl` -•, Ji.� �tlV!^y}V.�w�i•fj�� p���ryY � w�� !/l �
ya.•.`�i. #.,q8 .csSwt'i3'� ,•, 1' '�::
NY �YP .�^L �• r U. Ji1['.y ^g 3yu `3' YLSN+• yCQ !
�•yA ajar �:m c «�, �� iw. N N.i4. �.lY �A r4 W �. � �,
ap ` � p�` '� �s g. oY' .'9Yar. a�e�. �g ''�. � "&g Aa .•. °�� S'�aA, L,
i � a4� a'` �' -�$ o� „�� �1$L $��l$ �l•ii ~S: �c �°di�� '
" � e ffi s � Y � '.f...e. • w P `�.. M g ~--' e'! g,� Y $ +� +�! y $,!� N, � ��
V�1 - eur°r �� ar�ii ��M wq FM V•Y��11iY �wai ,'�r�„��r v
Ear
•girds �r .W is • t� ±�a' 'NNE u P -41 .11J w.w. +. -
.�ca
OF
Zi lZi.•r .C..r...w �. svr;r� +Y ie® ,..ui• it �..P. �. Yi'y,
pw w OH^ �A� �.�b'w.. �y�r1� �y s.r � �µ+' qY rYi' N #�� ' r, �,. ww • .1tl�
M:+d �14,s ~i � WOR�ARJ
if
a4�
—tl y�►tli ���'�' l: g�YI Jj yi'Atl tly.
�� . `i� mss
d�,53 w it 7t � 4 ' ") 'a �
IL
Mpg ��°i' .... �1� w,� �n I� 'r °_',��i`Y ,.�y�i `�:,, �$' {j� "��• a!�'
Vrm
rag 3�
_ allots 1
i �°Ar • rqi .,".d w� y,,"� «r i`,a, n yw w �.
�p Y �Yg a�µS�tr ii4 egg °`ax�v
—Lot "m I's OV
'Jug rE6
At& U~ '�i �. air a.' «�.4a �lr. �' ir.� "s` �a•
4�1 w qs 11f w
�Gw 4y a 4+iy��'.W ?�'J`�{ .%1
3 .. R�t.$�F t tli
QU
44, - .- .- ._._._..._.,_- .7-
owl
1:0 jK
i : � ��" �'S' _.. �� Q ._....��'�- .� =°�.,� � � a�t � � � y Os y�i•ffi _ _ w Ad.�.��^ Vr- .•- ....•.....__.,.W:
$�Yj p �11ap M {s3� SW p : aPi w, w QCs`
wi LT US all P y L1L BC Iw 14T4 0.✓ L'�9 N N
,+y��GjC ��W+'4� �M +RM M. iW v�
'Ti':s�e gw.� fy 1 -4 ,NN �nw. N, M gals
fi pip
Ism 3,
Gi w� Yom. � \ y
.g�: r a
[ �5 o2g, ,
x`13 zu g ' `� I U '
L
43U,
.� f P+°M Y .f f it!.,
VY
x
®max . of / gs
I=a R, :r 7-.,;
tLA
JL
y+"g++fyryv �!,p' ►% d�'q��, x$60
y'�,> -�r (�_� ®WY ++'LM@ �b
WI at
c� iqur� t 4 i st
04
H 92 (
wa_ wM '. ,' , ti"'",a .s. `'^ waF 9� w `i�`ti''`• f,,aw a `.
- �4 p w-J 'q +`y tr ft >'"" ,iy i.
�6nRw �rn�a 116 Qb' fi f.Q
fill M,� r 9
I „ 7!
� 7 .Y��r N�~ et V 33 qq.
E$' .•»off
it '
MUM
Zu
F CC
PZ
ej
bsgig
tl
LL,
fig" If
as
a LM
4 w�
513
All_ Y
€, k° gip.
�c
Am
» ! NMV w�
it YEN '!�� w�. �r"R �. /••/±J� 'yam, {�yi,,lgyy .i�l,OlppL�
W e4la � �N ii 7�' M u » e f ;y C rte.
wE,. '� i y°z k 4
W H� w u .,3 `� i•° (��''.� � � -ate �S'�'� �,7 � u0 �a. �!.e say � a.•n "{,� -`aY °w
o N
0
ibu
C 1z
Zia
H�
- AM ° E ■{jam p ! ry�
Tt• V {. ° qV �'. y ®p .� L..¢N. O!��Y � - es f� �` �^y Y`�yg} • •� Qp y��Oy,.�Yg
fa
SIC
_ s+°
.,Sig
� ��..e N NYCY'r • y
WY Yy. M1L
N L. ��•� sa° Y 1.
M y�'1 • J3 {YN� � C jy^�e
v L N
A... 1j. yp -,e.i_"l
Eli
Al
TL 21
«.011
�� N� rye _ g�
q y •4 R
M"' b� �NTY '�NG' 444f '� _ ,��j^�,�.FjjF�� �C 1.i iy {pew h •j
H.Y. V `a y.- `w `• �1 \'S�� w;� �.�� Yh_M.
w l pp
If
C `���.CCCt_ �s `. a°" 9w°i ; ` �• .� !1 m�`�1�{ AQ.Y4y '�._� e � � t_ �
lJ � M N C,y 9• �_�� rii lM. �t p biwlL
O
it
IK-
s
tt I
i! f
t j S I4 i
f.'yYL 'a V ^� 1f �'Y '.. � Y pwt� I a' Qy�• \JAYY q. y�O
V s .gt.y� ww° ��g�ip 111{{iiii e i VaCC. o r ANN. IIVff a w �jY�
O » d1 T .� O V. , I , C 2` O �' ;p ^ -
z
all sR' a r
'S3 13
All 1-1 e
11 tvs 1,
'g .►�_ ^mow u�rN iyN6 MYN si�l Va.
M� qw .}p L 1.. A 4. sL 4.0 `N C
a� OU Q^ 0-0-
3 fig If alit
N Y V i
M _ OC L i M. ,j • C Tyr 3M p �yf� 0�1 V
4M ti�rl �01yp M: �� `}p ^i» wLi NY yam. Yl QNT� wY~ N'n���2j
K.Y Rbs 6yy'upp. _NL Yr.'U
h N Y +L'1LiG iQ{1a hAA
j v
s
-- - r—` ary Or RANCHO CUCAMONG�
DATE: tune -8;; 1988
TO 'Chairman and ers,of the Planning"Cowission
Ft(0 ;; Brad Buller, City Manner o �=
8Y: Cynthia Xft er' Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:_ WIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -2f;/= Y1�
,,- - Ine request,
` es s an u anc) 1
sere ce.su s a on in a lensed 'Space of 2, square'feet
within an existing multi tenant industriapar on 5.22
-� acres o; (Ind irs�he General Industrial Disl�ir. ��SUbarea
13 lodAte south of !grow Routi, ori, the west side of
dinej64d Avenue - APM; 207- g%2 -49.
S. PROJECT AM SITE DESCRIPTION:.
A. Action Requested; ;Approval of a non - construction Conditional Use
Permit to,. estabTish an ambulanco services; substation within an
existing multi- tenant industrial` park; located, at 8550 Vineyard
Avenue, Suite - 4084.
B. SuProunding Fand Ute and '3onin :.
or th Con n um-s. t !Ui-um Density Residential (8 -14
d�;+eiling units ,per acre)
South - Vacant; General Industrial _
East - Industrial Baildiag General ,Industrial
West - Vacant; Mood tontrol " Q
C. General Plan Designations:
Prrbject"Sive = e�neral Industrial
North Medium Density Residential' t8 -14 dwelling units per � c
acre?
South General industrial
East =, General Industrial
West c Flood Control
D. Site 'Characteristics: The proposed use is located within an' ` u
existing en i p industrial park which is p;rtiallY �t
occupied.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
a
CUP 88 -23 - MERCY, AMOULAKE
June 8, 088 4
Page, 2
41
E. Pnrkim,Calculations;
Number of Nunber cif,
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use S Foote Ratio Rewired- Penvfded '
---- f,-- -- n
CPA _ pt. „r
r� G40, 1/25o 'i 3
Nigh Spee( C'uit
Tec%haiogy�Inek ; 2,000 1/430
Dresselhau - ;Computer '
Products 2,000'' 1/400 5 5
Big Eagle fieal Estee E40 I /250
Cornerstone Fellowship 1 -,1
Genesis Counseling 640 1 100 2
Transtar Companru 2,000 T 400 5 5
Vacant 1,80 1/40p 5 5
Mercy Ambulance 2,10
* Proposed TOTALS 33 33
,
F. -Applicable R_ ulatioris. 'The, Ind�stjrial Specific Plan (`hsre��a�� �
a u �
um 'b`l'tic . e and Utiliti $ervices, sub�ect�J �h
(" approval of a Conditional Ilse ?ermit by "fihe pi^5ning Coea� 'lion. Adftk
II» ANALYSIS:
A. General: The propose opera t /24 hours
-��
a "�y, seven digs a':0ek. There will be Cwo aa6ujance 4ss ggnu \\
to this substation, ach being manned by two ftsld,pers 1 is"
Exhibit "A"); 4*:_
D Issues: one primary �- issues mai' tto lecA�,�ng t16o --We of'use
Vlthln an industrial setting W4 c mpatibility With surrounding
Ousinessss 'and parkiFig ,availability. There are .a=:,variety of
uses cur, ntly in t`a center and
compatibility probieh ;
associated r4itk an ambuirnaO SON= could be pa►.king and siren
noise.
The Development Code res ;res one arks sorr��d�� per, X50 sgnart'
feet of boil ding area, this resulis in, 'I far eight
parking spaces. The c+ri+ent on•si'i a pJrking-„� -.Zj fight S004 for=
this unit would therefore 'be ade ate to tccoi a v the use.
` M�wever, the aabulances are f wide and fees` ion x
., g.
sfrd parking sta d sd ze is 9 eat by L9 The 'an�iulances
th�rtifore aro 3 feet longer«th ;. thr�tauArd stab. Staff -
there €are reca ends Wt,,the Wli4anre-r� stripe two ov*rst d
parking star along the ,,rear.. of the buf4 ding, to adeoiate y S
accaamgdate thv�aebttldnceS�f4
j
PLARKIWV COMKISS109 STAFF REPORT V
MERCY AMBULANCE
l� �LL'. � 2986 f% i' Q ( _ •.
Pag+ R7 �� r
d onmd t oniStaff Mul e iigrt` se 'ached prchtb t sigh' _
use 4iih.in this igdus�trial park. the Foothiail Fire Pratection
District has revie+vad this a tplication and his no tome t T;
Exhibit "B"). ,
III. FACTS Fad FINDINq G
„1. The proposed use is< in accoHike 'nth :the tiene *41 `>
Plon„° thef, obdectty; , of the ejelop* n't*" C and
the pur#Dses of to Indu ;:rigi s"pecigic _�lan
Subarea In which tt!e,''site fq jeatted.
�1 p bt heir h osaf ty, for;. welfare � ateria �e _* `
inJurious ° to, properties - r ;; Wtrgj,' ents to the
vicinity4 o +
3. The proposed'. caeip'F:ies 'Witham ,4&ch of tlic
applicable uroviai4ns of thf - specific
��Pian.
Id: C4RRESPL'rlidF.fiCE� Shit" item has beerv,,"vertfsed_as a public heating
ri'—TFie Doi f newspaper, the praper posted; and notices sent
to all i?Prcer ore
rs within'3m,_feet of the prat.
Y. RECrMEkATIrN: Used un the ab a . llrsis of51'ac ertd findings,
s. _ recp ►as # y�� Punning ;' *4si4" �epprovC ��diti al Use
'trm 8 123 a th, ',��' h adop is 1 ��st olkition and
? issu ;pce o a. Negative Decia►ration ,--
GI
espe l�Engitt c=
�• J��. ' u = `� ``� ,mil CiG
Brad Suite,-U �
'City
8B•CK:te is
Attachments `, RxWbit NA' Lette lft�i Applicant
{ Exhihit "�- ;�ndur iron► Fod#i1i irict
'Exhibit ,. -Location gap 5 - = 0 c
- Exfsibit :" < Floor pl n�
Resolution of Approval" �°
7r
`
C
_
7Q �-42 � 6- -88 PC Agenda 2- of 4
.� o
_. _
aT'PL CATiCN FQR Ct? QNc�,i, LiSE
#�AIT P K1 T
PR0,7ECT DESCI#MON:
�1
This agrol icatl on x"or - ConditionWI\ -Use, Permit in X6 the re-
r' �
location of our.,ambulance sub- statiiln to the Vineyard hest
Bu inessnPark fa4 Vaueya8 ev<s<,ite ?ioS, 8aich6 ucamo a.
°=
ln_ February of .1. 66, „Conditional' tafse Permit 85-29 at ranted
an'',ambulanre station at 8 �o Foa;�h�;.11 Blvd„ "11%. Rancho
, i$gite
Guoamepga t8eru1h ttllage� « Sine, then, othill :''gvd. ,;has
become an inoreaslna2y heavily traveled. street. our statran
w
if
location has only mpe exit which it onto' the maan flow,, of tr21F1C
on Foothill )BIVd. :.,
T' , proposed location in the °vineyard iftst `Susiness Park' provides
access onto .two road thoroughf:jkres„ V n4lVard Avr,< -and Arrow
'
Route. Additionally, the busir�esmr park has foi3� ,passible exit
points ontAtthese t" streets.
'
'
This request, for Ithe are - location of ouzo ambulance cub 'stgtion is
,
to improved out accessibility t6 e4i.n str �tV ar►d facRx� ate *he
i:aee a» movement when resisondang to en►er «• *� Palk
J � � edlis
City of Rancho Cucamonga`.. This is in 46cr !,e �xth the city' 61~
Aar�»ho Cucamonga Ordinance Noe 269, Seot Cn 8.1� 0 20t61r
°
't'Fie rAj3C98e+C1� Location nips t4 be S36ed_ as >�` �T.'�J,it?5���.nce✓ station for
c
the puhposeM of assigning emergency'�ehirq, .ka�zfbt lances) tos
.re :spond to 0-Mer9enCX Cal' 8. '`he`2lL ojberl t+b f, i3 ?�1�3�r1ik44�� `'4iPS�1C�8iL'CZ -tG '
the' tatioa will -be two, each staffed tl ftrld persibnnel
,
(paramedic and BM ^s ) r tot,%,k personnel 'to be assigned to the
statl.on
gfou>t . ; Due to the natures of our business, the hours
of opperattx, n . is i;t
hours a`' day seven bays a. week.
� 1
U
�ti4
rr 4i
Alto& r
f � O
� � 1
:�
G�r•t
1� Q
4 or
1
,,iii
t(.,I
m
Milk ll,lli „�,8s',
�(ff1111Jfzll4�iiEri;;
`
1 It.AI ♦• (i la ,��F ! Irry
�,
jA ll.
i �1�!
�l:
l.lt
a 111♦
aWith
tr
Its Il�ttt 1. tl�l��ltii �t 1, If 1„
11
„fir
4tt,tratit
�TRCQ�
at,_
rr ,a,�
y
„�( It ,•fill , , ,lli ht „
��t+,(ti iii,rt��lf,ltt3rlltltii
fi,sntf��, � t�,��
��l
i�i
r���i��.if�
�.,��� dear
��3� •�� px,Q�`
tt ll,-
rlllkl� t. �(b�Ylt It
i I tills,,, xll,_ ". T „lii,f ti
iJ�� `r,�S ��
4
Ct�
; ii..cil
2`11b
, ,
• e•1
iii
t
tiit7t Itli.l,t,,,tti \ „e.,ttk „ir
1 ,�
,
,
,I
}
RESOLUTION Nq,
A RESOLUTION OF THE% ANCHO UCAMONGA,,PLAONI COM41fSSION
APPROVTNG CONDITIOr�1E, USE PERMYI "1dtf. "88 -23 FOR "AN
AMBULANCE SERVICE !WS- STATION LOCATED. PTT 8560 VINEYARO IN {{
THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DI YCT - APN 207-262-49 I
A. Recitals' ✓j �{ T
Ffercy Ambulance has fill -d acs application for, the issualcd'of the �
Canditional. ` use Pe it , Nts; 68 -23 as described in tki titli -, of this
Resolution. Here'nafte } in this ftSolutian, thiL, SUbiect ConditiAnal >.USe
Permit request iS r'tsferr to ,as "the application". i
(ill On. the S" June 1988,° the Pranriing Commission' of the
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public hearing on t.",,applicat art
and cong4Crd said: hearing on that''date
(M) Ail legal prerequisit4s to the adoption of this iesolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORC, it is hire by� found, deter mi � �ed and resol a+ed by the
Planning CMission `or' the ty of Rancho Cs�camongf AS f:�hloWs.
Ak 3 This ,to*isston hereby specifically fin That.; all of tote, facts'
set forth in the Recitals, Part A .of,, this 1lesolutiort' are true and coirecta
Z. ,`Based upon su starrtia3 evidetrce ppesontr,'� to this Commissioh
during the above- referenced public ilearing on -June �,, Wi,�-Includtw written
and oral staff' reports, together with public iestimq,4,•this Corm fission h e
specifically .finds'as follows,. (a) The application - applies -to property wctcated:at 8564 WYMY' and
is prespntl icproved with a m1t 46na t-- #0$trial park; and„
(b) The p pQrty to thto north"of the site is
condominiums, the proper; ,to the Sout�? of that site;Cansist , of vteant�laind,
the property to the! east ` is fndustrial buildings, and the property tar;tr cFt�t�s�t
is vacant. r ;
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above- referenced public hearing and upon"', the spr?cific.findi�rgs,of
foots set forth in parranaph 1 and 2 above, this CommisslOn btreby funds 0d
concludes ?s follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord L witri the
. General Plan, the objectiVes'of the Devolopment
Code, and the purposes of the''distr ct In which
W site i$ laoated
u �
41
PLAN�iT►�iG._CQ�lIS5TQM `RESQLt!'�I4Pl lJQ. rf .
'MERM
CUP 8323 - AMOULANCC 1 t
dune 8, i98A __._
Page
�z
ib ?~,That the proposed use, together` with the
'conditions
applicable thereto, =will not be
detrimental to the. public hcalths safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or i�srovnts: in .F`�r° vipinity.
(c) That the proposed use 'complies with each of the
`applicable provisions of the D,evelopme"t code,
4. ' tb'<. Commnis!4n hereby finds and certifies that the p:Oject 'has
been, reviewae, -and considered in compliance W—, ;,the 'California Environmental
Quality Ai*' '/'of 1g7A, and, further, this'' Commission her��y :issues a Negdtive,
i)eclarai,;,�t.. f�
S. 'Based upon the OW 6§s and. conctusions' -(set foirtS;
s[ O�+'_ .`i•HO¢�n!c�•J�iV/+�,'....i3i�%
R.—(.
jjj�. �s
DATE:
,i ,ie 8, 1986
TO:
Chairman and Members of tine Planning Ca�ffission,ti
.
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner,
Tom 'Grahn, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRWRENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDYTIWI&. USE PERMrt 88 -19
e request o es, a'tiS
erica I off ces I a a ease space of 16,856 'square feet
within an existing, [nd�astr{al fisark on 1,6: acres of Viand
"
in-,the Industrial Park District (Subarealllj located at
10837 Laurel'' Street • APN 208- 351 -57.
,l
Y. PROJECT ARO SITE DE SCRYPTYONu
A.
Action Requested* Approval of a Conditional Use Pevvit for a
+1;
med ca office, and the issuance ofll'�egative Declarat'On.
B.
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning.
cant, arry: s es*aur'ant, 1a u�t:•ial 3�aak
South - Vacant;. Industrial Park
East - ;`Vacant- Industrial Park ,
West - Coun Y Law and lusiioe Cantors Industrial Part:
.
General Plan Des_ gna tot�n�s,+:
Project e - n us. r aF" Park
North - industrial Park
South - Industrial'Park
East - Industrial Park
Meat Industrial Pare -
13.
Site Charaeteristicst 7110 proposed use is located within an
ex s ng office .Pa •. There are currently three, out of an
eventual six, one and two-story garden office buildings on the
�!
Project site. There are no other tenants, withid? is office
.
park at this time.
E.
Parking Calculations:
'Number of timber of
Type, Square , Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use FootaC'e Ratio Required Provided
Medical Office " 16x966 1/200
Office 16,$56 I /25O 68 68 .
r? _q1TEM Z
..
p 1�
P�IAMnzw_ °C06�iISSION STAFF REPORT ,.
C�P'BB�i - PACIFIC PHYSICIAN' SEt 2CES
June 8, 1988
t f
i F. Aificable Regulations- The Industrial Area Spncific Plan
con , ona�'ly perm s .. dical /Health :Care �er*1iceS '�sithin the
Indust _3a1. Park D1str1ct1(aub4r�ea 7),,, :
II. ANALYSTS:
A. General: Pacific Physician., Services is proposing to use one of
{
e rlree existing buildings (appr�ximatCly 16,S56,square filet)
within fire Laurel Aspen' Execu r e�Office' Park (see Exhibit ,
'The
proposed facili� ai k hotse . obstetricians ,`°
o pediatricians, faMily practitioners, I and 6iseveral other
specialties. The t tal number of employews will not exceed Q
persons and the hours of operation will be X;i, to '5:30
P.M., Monday through °Friday# however, after hours services can
be made by appointment only'.
In assessing the availability, of parking, a large discrepancy
;
was noted between the number df= parkin$,5paces required versus
the number of parking spaces provided ?hey" Laurel Aspen
Executive Dffice pkrk proposes a total of six one and two -story
.
garden-,office buildings and etas perked �GV office standards -at a"
ratio -of „one., space ,Per each 25D square ft of gross floor
area. Baled on a Roar area pf 16,S5S square feet; a total of.
68 parking spaces were„ rav4derl fo, �Ah; s tenant space. ,
The pro osed medical office requires a ratio of one space per.
200`sq, re,.feet of gross floor area, or
a OUT of,;85 space3,
thus leaving a discrepancy of 17 parkfing,�spaces., Staff is
concerned with this discrepancy. and to mitigate the potential
parking problems that may arise,
�
a condition has been included
1 in the Resolution that additional phases withJ4 this office
park will be decreased ,in floor area. equal in area to the
additional parking requiremenfi� for this use {
B.. Environmental Assessment'. Par -. I of the Initial'Study has been
completed uy We app '$'cant 'Stiff has completed Part 'II of the
ti
Environmentai.Checklist<,add has found eto significant impacts on
U6 environment as a result of this project.
4
III. FACTS Fr)R FINDINGSa
1. That the pro used use is in accordance with the
„ General Plan, the obj' Lives of the Development Code
,i
and the purposes o, ,ne Industrial Area Specific Plan
Subarea in which to site is located.
SERVICES wam ucan l4l. a:h
may is, 1988 '
44 2319,88
� L►irector of Planktig W n 14
City of !jncho Cucamonga
ar , Rancho CU4, cMo O , 4A 91734
Qn
RE: CUP Processing 168,57 Laurel Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91'T36
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to your request,, tbis letter is submitted in support of
the request of Apsen medical Ifuildingv for a CUP at this particular
location in order to utilize this previously constructed building,
for medic . purposes, The building at tbi: "ration is ideally
designee ad suited fox meditanl use&. It is unique, in ti #ate its
style ci_ Ears substantially from other office buildings in t'he.
areas and lends itself to "a more pleasing, relaxed nature aejo� ^
ciated with the medical prr 'ctice.
The facility will house Qbstetricians,,,, ed aa4'ns, farm /1 prac
p Patric l,
fiitioners, and 4everal btuar, specialties, le iar' antsciPitd that
the total number of empl-Yee$ shall, not be greatsr uthen. 35 40#re '!�
srd the .ass of operat:i'�atv*) will be 8:30 a.m. tO:5z3G p.m *, Mo tday
ttV ough Friday# with of r6"hours aevvLoes by appointment Only.
Also enclosed, per yot-z request, are floor plans for the first and
second floor of the; -- fa,oility for your revilw,
We look forward to VZtzentino our
project to you an dune 8, 1988,
at your next ,planailg meeting,. In, the vaantime,, should you;, have
any questions, pleases .feel' free to contact me di3'agtly.
Thank you for youtr consideration.
r
Very cordia y your
RO Losaett
_ RDLf
En urot 5 ;Copies of Floor plan
`
cc virginie, LaRosat
-Jack Corrigan
Lp c44aspen r
�� 12 North fifth Strew a itedtsndsY+&1(f*MJ& 9 13 a (714) M -4464
r 11
i
PARCEL. MAP' 40, 9lo3
M! TMIC CITY or, MdMCpp t {hpp34-
� ea t7ee foeMMuxI ,n �rtfn.e' fe re u � loas U .4 - o a ► all
fm u�lA! n° rfr�t"`e r r Y
�I. ..
eJMt qfA
t.0 two. wMtlMMe S�OWtat -R 1 t,
_ _._.i.__..� _.�� ee■c ewer
L..�. �.r .......o....« it (J n.
S
er
It
4 Q
Y
r0RTTkH
My OF
RANCHO CUCA GA TITLE,5
Bli
EXHI
;LL�-I- Scxw �......� i
I
!__.
zI,
y wf
�t
�t
J4
�s
CITE' OF 1: T 9 : --
�ANCHO, CUCAMTONGA Tz"TcL' 9:
PLANNING bIVISION * im
T_ ;r
1 T '
III I 1l yl� LA> '. y
-•. I f -- n,a •a
r A.
L-Y
Li
AML
19� OI •Si ,GI
�� �, •Ill u9 -.,� � L „s ® — �1 � a
O
4 ITEM..
' CU
CAMONGA TiTLIAL"
PLANNIN
OF
AA lit fin
Ex
SCA
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA+iOMCA PLAN4V4 .00WISSION
} APPROVA CONDITIONAL 'USE PERMIT RD" - FOR r1 MEDICAL
OFFICE LOCATE AT 10837 LAUREL. STREET .19 THE IWUSTRIAL
PAW OISfiRICT, SUBAREA 7: ApHs 208 - 351 -57 « �
Ncixa i_s
s ,
(i) Pacific Physician Services leas` filed an application for the
fissteamce of the Condit)anal i)se permit No 88.,.19 as described in the title of
this RESO.IutiQnb„ Hereinafter in this'Resolu on, the'subject Conditional Use
Permit request is :referred to as "the -. appl icaii4jO,, `
On, the, h of June, 1988, the "Planning "ComesSion of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga ydnducted 4 duly, noticed public hearing on h'a ?gplication
and concluded sai�hearing on that dat,Q �� a
Citi) tilt legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution 1
have ocomered. y
B Resolution;
I
NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, deternp .1ned and resolved by the
Planning Cauais inn of the City of Rancho Cuca*onga.as follow
1 This ComMssion hereby specifically finds, that "all of the facts
set forth- in, F the Rocitals, Part A of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upq-. , substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during tie oh or 4eferenc public hearing w4une 8, 19H8, includingi written
and oral start reports,, togew,4*r with public tif
estimonyi this Caraaiss qn hereby
specifically finds as follows:'"
(a) The application applies to 15,855 ie are` feet ot�Aeasable
space 0 property located.at 108317 Laurel Street. Se dlproperty is' developed
with three buildings and associated parking; and
rb) ilte .apFlicant proposes tc operate'a medical office Monday throug Friday frost. 8:30 X6.14. to 5:30 P.Xi . with ,!Mr, hours ,services by
appointwent only:
3. Based upon the substantiat i idec�se presented to £his' Comission
during the above - referenced public fearing and upon the specific findings, of
facts set,forth in :paragraph 1 and 2 above, this omission hereby finds and
concludes as followsa
to}
That the proposed use is in accord with the
General Plan, the objectives of the 0evedopment
Code, and theapurposes of the district finhich
the site is located.
r t,<
PLANHII'!G csxMlSsloN ii?riJ7`1oN
� CUP 8&49 PACIFIC PW . TCI� SERVICES
June 8, ig88 ,`
Page 2
(b) That the proposed uses together with the
f:
conditions applicable, thereto, will not be
detriviintE3 to., #e public health, safety, or ,
s,elfare, or mateFialiy injurious to propertf.
or° improvements in the vicinity,.r
(c) That the °proposed use complies with each o "the
ap licatfl� provisions of the Development Code,
4. This 'Cowtss an hereby, finds and cehifies ttat the project has
been reviewed" and considered in 0mAiance with the CaMfornia gnvironmental
Quality Act bf 1970, and,' further, this .Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
S. Based upon the finds "ngs and can+lu53ons.set forth in parag "aph
Y, 2.and 3 above, this ,_Commissi`on,hereby appro "s the application subject to
each and- every condition set` forth below and in the - ,attachedi St *ndard
,. Conditions attached hereto and incarporated herein by this reference.
(1) Arty modification, 'expansions or other change in''-
operation will require"a revision ta. the, Coodj;tfonal,;
Ilse
(2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance
with all sections "cf ills Industrial Area Speciflc
Plan, and all ott& City Crolinances. !�
(3) If the operatii»r of "the, facility causes adverse �
effe^ts upon adjacent bust nesAes, or uperations, the
GonditiaIal use Permit 'shall be. brought before the
planning4, Commission for,9the consideration and
possible "teminati6o of �4. use.
(4)` Occupancy of the facility shall not comnco'tntil
such time as all Uniform Building Codetand State
fire - *rhsal.l s regulations have been- complied
with. Prior to Occupancy;' plans shall be submitted
to the Foothill Fire Protection district and the
Building and' Safety Division Ito show compliance.
The building 'shall be inspected for cccflp lance prior
to occupancy,. °.
(5) AVW signs proposed for the facility shall Ve.,`'`
designed in con?'orw�nce with the -Comprehensive Sign
Ordinance, any Unifom Sign Progrank for the complex,
and shall require red few and approW by 'the
Planning Division prioT,PeMtt i �o instaTtatir —
(Y This Condition` "i's.' approved for , a
`r
maximum of forty ti)��ersonst
p ti
Pt,ANNING cOMISSIOR STAFF REPORT
CONOITIONAG USE PERA�CT fl8 2
June s, 4
SJ iSsB
° E. Parking Calculations: /
Number, of Number of
Type square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use . Faofiage 6tatGa Re uiro Provided;
IJ
Building A 24 000 1/250 96 _
Building '8
vacant 35,503 1/250 143.
Hair Salon 2,.Ig * g
L, Building C 24;000 " 11400 60
Building D 14,400 11400 36
* i space per beautician station: and
L space per barber chair -
F. Applicable Neghlationss The industrial Specific Alan (Haven
avenue xer is ), al`#ows Personal Services ;,sobldct to
the approvaj of a GO ditioval,; Vie Peraait by Planning
c: Commission. Hi thin "--the j)htaven " Avenue `Werlay District,
ancillhry uses such as sPersaOal Ser ves are not .to- exceed 20
percent of the °floor aria for-an y Master Planned ,Devel000ent.
i A� 'General ;r ' The proposed Bair talon wilt operate 4 days a, week'
4 r —AFi to 6 PH and 2 days a week ,from 4 M to a p" (see
r
Exhibit RA "). The business operation, will include hair cutting
; {
and coloringk nails and skin care,
B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this tyre of
use w thin an office park setting gyre cdatibili with
Surrounding businesses and parking—availability. The iaajority
of the center is currently vacant. Compatibility, with.
surrounding business, however, is not expected to be a problem
due to the na(t�lre of the .use'.
The . Deve1 opiae ;t Code requires 2 ,parking space. per barber chair
and 3 parking spaces per beautician station. The applicant
proposes to have 3 beautician stations 4nd`'8,ieanucurist /fashion
chairs. This results in a requirement for 15 parking spaces.
The unit is currently allocated g spaces, however,, there are 15
rf
extra parking spaces on the site of which the applicant could
I
utilize 6 spaces. ,based upon the adequate parking4' and
corapatibfliy of the use, staff steels that it is not necessary,-"
1,
j
to restrict the �rours of operation.
j
PLANNING COMISSION STAWTEAFORT _ �}
CONOITI�►NAL ,U5E #�i;RMIT �" -24 ,'
Page 3
The Foothf," Fire Protection .ai5tric- haste reviewed this
appiisat n has no ca�ent (see Exhibit "B" );
111. FACTS FOR FI DINGS' \
L That the 'proposed use,is in accordance' wAh the General Plan,
the Qbjectivos of the pevelop*ent code; and the purposes of the
Industrial Specific Plan Sub$res in which the site is located,.
Z. That tlt�le proposed use will not be detHmntal to the pubic
heatthi, saftty, welfare, or ek�fierially injurious to properties
or improvements in thel ac, -SF A
3. Thet,the prooso.ad use complfes with the e h of the applicable
1 provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. p
IV. GDRRESPONOENCE: This item has been advertised °ds a public hear g
n ae a ry-Re art new►spaprr, the property prsted, sand nati es
sent to a proper. y owners within $W'feet of the project. ,
W. RECOMENDlkTIOti: Based ; upon the above analysis of facts. 4or
zags, /s aff rec ds the Planning 'Cofission approve
Conditionally use Pern►iB�74 ihroggil issuance ,of a' Negative
o Declaration and adoption he attached R ®solution, h
R jspect . °i%� sutq d,
0grit u)ler J
City PXanner
8B- Ck;tng -
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter #'roes Applicant
Exhibit "DO - Memorandum from FQQthill Fi I)istrict
Exhibit "C" - Site Ptah
Exhibit "0, - Floor pl.a.
Resolution, of Approval
t,
1
t. t;
LL-, (�,;��aeC�k�' t35fr�gSS`��Y�3P.i'3t[i1i
iCC YJYb1A studio: will be a high tech, Professional hair salon.
The services are going to concentrate on total look, including
personalized hair cutting ;and hair cars separate coloring
department, nail department specializing in custom air brush art,
and possibly in the - future a skin care department. The salon will be
fully computerized. The owners intention is to provide an open,
airu, modern feel, rnai,� comparable to ,tharL-to the
r,
traditional image of tli�� beauty salon. The theme is perta6itity;
styling equipment will \s storedjggirlerl in movable work stations.
Each station is set off . the others, affording privacy and
preventing distraction .�dm the rest of the salon activities.
Adjustable, easef• Ilk:,, krors allow stylist end clients to judge
flair proportion td: the "�*fof the body and in rotation to the overall
"look"
The salon will empoy about 10 people, whet fixity operational.
The business hours will be front 9;00 AM to 6;OOPM four times a
week, and from 9,00 AM to 8 :00 PM two times .1'a week, Occasionally
"
the salon will be open on evenings and Sundays.
The rapidly ntoog ,Rancho CucaMonga area is highly sked to
this type of service given that it is a growing, upscale community.
This will provide an exc0lont pool o clients who value
their professional and personal appearance. Haven Executive Park is .'
perfectly suited for the high tech, modern salon described above, Clue
to its. unique architecture and location,
Ms. Krystyna Jackson bas over 15 years of experience' in the
beauty industry. Her credenti �—_,iiiclude t,2 years with Vidal $assoon
Beverly Hills , and *In .Francisco $alons, starting as an assistant and
marking her way up to the position of the Director. She was also
employed at the Vidal Sassoon Academy in Westwood as a manager.
Her experience includes work with models for T.V. shows, like Mery
,r`ffirt Shaw- AM C_ag Anct` I m an Eangisra, magazines like
lw=. *Qm2n gWwrw.Dai v, numerous fashion shows and
E �f lnternatlo-naI7 contests. In the last three years she has worked as, a
r consultant in advanced haircutting and business management.
ill �•ll T �i i
G1 G2 C-3 '
i t
f ° e
j . a
i $.2 i' C-4
f B -4 8,11 a w..
� 4 °
C.s
810
B-3:<.
C.7
¢ C-9
• sa
t i
' ♦ / ✓�'' // ° 11.3
@-4
1 0 0
1 . �
s
NORTH
eITY OF r ITRM CUP
$&Zq
RANCHO CUC `ONGA "UT LE:
r PLANNING DIVISION
EMBIT: so..,y
fire
exit _
'
staff
room
rest office
room
manicur t
entrance
nw-
changing rooms rout desk
shampoo /color' dept.
nutting
Proposed floorpian for unit BT area
10532 Acacia St
Rancho Cucamonga, -7
NORTH
CITY OF
i
IIANCIRO CU �.
EXHIBIT SCAM
RESOLUTION' NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING; COMt9ISSION
APPROVING CONbITIOW USE PERMIT NO.'8$ -24 FOR A }FAIR
SALON LOCATED AT 14532 ACACIA IN TK INDUSTRIAL:' PARK
DISTRICT APN: 201401.01
A. Recitals.
(1) Kryst a Jackson has filed an application for the issuante of
the Conditional Use Permit, No. 88.24 as described in the title of this
Resolution Heret..;Xter in this Resolution, the subJftt Conditional -Use
Permit rQest is referred to aso the application". r
(ii) On the Bth of June, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted A duly noticed public hearing.. an the application
and concluded said hearing ,44 that date.
(iii) All legal Oerequisites, to the adoption `of this Resolution
have occurred. /
C7 rtiL \L�
B. Resol'ution.�:
n �r
N4N� THEREFORE,,
it is hereby ,-ound, determined ants- resolved by the
AOL Planning'Camnr�ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission irr�e rfy iifificaily finds that all. of the facts,
set forth in the Recitals, Part, A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
Dase4 uppq,z;ubstantial 4�idence presented to this 6ommission
during theYabove- refe'ren'ced public heat 'ing on June 8y 1988, including written
,,#nd oral staf€ its together with 011lis testiWAY, this Commission hereby
h*ci €icaT w as follows
(a) applies to
The application a - p.- operty located at 10532'Acacia
is presently impf� ved with muliC - tenant industrial park; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject`sit, i s vacant, the°
property to the sourth of that sita consists of office building, the property �7y'
to the east tsJnddttriat buildings, and the property to the vast is vacant.
(c) The applicant proposes a beauty ,salon, including hair
cutting and coloring, nail and skin care"' A total of 3 beautician stations rl
and 3 manucuristlfashion stations whiChi'!wouU require 15 parking spaces.
There: are 15 parking spaces available for the leased space.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing and Upon the specific ffij- of
facts set forth -4p paragraph 1 and 2'above,,this Co ission berry €inds and ;,
concludes as folljwS.
T
Q, PLANNING, COMMISSION hEsdilLutiom No.
CONDITION& USE PEFMIT 88
June 8
(a) That the
proposed use is fvk' ascot` .eft '�je
*general , •P►au[, the objectives of the 66-i0opisent
Cole, and the purposes of the.eistrirt in which~
the $Ito ts.located. � r
(b) That the proposed Uia, together -With the'!
conditions applicable %*reto, -,jjtli n`ot be
detrir*ntrl to the . Ulic, ,health, safety, or;i,
welfare, or s,lateria" inj4urfious to prop er0e\� ",ji,
,.or *roveaem�s in t vicinity,
(c) That the proposed use x6WIi wi 1 oe`;h bf the( .,
applicable provi'si one of the vel went Code. ter`
4. This 01"iision h reby finds and''eartifies that the !oroject 'bas
been roviewed .eta,�onS**red II coa�lia. , with the California Environa�ental
@uaTi.ty Act of t;'�4: furo r, th 4 fission' hereby :issLes a negative
Declaration.
y v
S. 2 and 3 above, Based upon sigfriher�yand pra OS th ap0Iicatior sub ectqtopeaclt ,
and every condition sat forth below and in ihe,atta:ched StaMexdji Conditions,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this; refezence.
,1 (1) Approval of this request shall not valve compiian4e with all
sections of the Industrial Area Specific „Plan, and all other
City4rdinances.
IfF`the operation of the faEci`li'ty tausES ad4_-0Qe effects upon
adjacent businesses or AIoper-ations, : including, but not
limited to poise, ' the Conditignal Use 'Per i : >Shail: be
brought before t1WPlanning 6NWssibn Vor the -co"nsideration
and poss ble termination of the use.
(3) Signs proposed for the facility shalI be - desfgaoa to
conformance with the Oo"rehenSive Sign ordinancei any.
Unifor_ -.Sign Prograo for the complex, arIl ' V4611 regu.re
review ,4nd approval_ by the Planning 04isi�on prior to
inst�riatioli.
6. The Deputy Secretary to thi Comission;,shall cirtify to
adoption of this Resolution,_ c
Y
a .r,
1T \
ITS .
cu.010 rrT -_ .
STAFF REPORT p
DATE:
o
TO ;x Chairman and Ymbers of '-the Planning Commission `
FROM Brad 0 a I a City Planner`'.
,z
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ETIWAVDA SPZCIFIC FLAV fiHENDMENI 88,•02, CI` y OF RANCtN1
recites o:aRmen a E "�randa " p3 ecT ic�"1�i o
o. es sh a Co e0ity Tquestrfaii Trail on the west side
of East Avenue from a poet r ";,u�ghly,-,1'400 ffizet -north Of
Highland Avenue to E4th,5treet
1. BACKGROUND: On May la, 1988, the, -Pia6iwig Comsstsslgp considered` a
reques to establish a Community `Trail on the rest side df East :^
Avenue from a point 11,400 feel north of 1iighlaiid Avenue extending
north to 24th Street and to establish a cb'nsistent Wall design and
z setback for East Avenver ,After receiving all public, {nput on' °thy`
propom, the Planning Commission a pr'ovo, the Wall design, and
setback: for .East "`Avenue. The ; C �ission,' , orrelrer,'� expressed
reservations about a Coaerxtnity Tram on East .A nue., ^4ith ta)e
anticipated traffic reayhir4 "20,000 to RO,000 aaerage daily trips
by the year 2010, the Co:m nission expressed c6ncepri about irhe safety
of equestrians; ustiig.. the ",trail . ' As a result, tht, Comanissioti
referred this item to the Trails AdviSrry Committee to ;review
j possible alternative trail lWations.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Trails AdvfsorS- Y,- _go=fttee: on May 18, 1988, the Trails
ei a revieW proposed alternatim to a Community
Trail on East Avenue.. After considering the various
T options, the Coftittee recomended the following:
1. The preferred alignment for the north -south Comte unity
Trail is in ,the parktiay, aloegg-�_the west side of East
,Avenue,fsee Exhibit ". "8°j. the Committee felt'':th &t
the C
ounit Tra
it
%an Eas ,..
y t Avenue would not crLate
an unsafe sitl##ation: The Co mittee referenced the
cities of Fullerton' and, San Viraz where, &'Vestrian
trails; are located alo6q Moor arterial road The
fencing between the trails and the streets pr�Dided
adequate separation between the two uses; In order
o accommodate a tram: at this „ location, the f
trail/pmrkway design could be ��Modified - acioks the
�4
17
TEN S
1
.STA&
t�
pr"M88 0lXSSxON liPiRT
t, City of Ran,cha cuca�or�sa
u�cu; 1988
Page ,1!
„not a pact" TO of Tentative Tract 1!3808 to mini iza '
the impact "s On the existing residence, The par�(r�>7
could be designed with a °ten (10 foot trail ami
_ four (4) foot ,50rb adjacent si&Wafk'. Ibis would '
require ortiy,'twa (2� addit orjai,-fe #t of44pd1cation
2. If the 'al'lgnmefit of the Community. ,Tral 1, Nang east
Avenue is .not desired, an 4te rnative .would be.,
provided two: (2) ntnit Trai'ls,, one -on oaeh- side
L of East Mono, that wo(gi�# li�''located i nally with
{nte.
l .7 any, future dev: tit riir
,[. ,.
S. $Ta7 ! 4.oi�%nR., aIs As ryas noted at the prey %us Planning
; W 3r%g `staff had 'soap, n erns about the
CompatibIlIty dt,- a 0o unity Tx11l 41000 .govt Avenue,
With the:' anticipated txaific reaeh3%g s`hi;lr,as BtI,OTiO
average lafly trips and Yebicbi ,� s�Zaeds btt aet� 40� and
,
5tt miles ' perI hours a CoWj4i1t .j aiI' +ay not 6e
adPr ©priate.
r' In e'vaTuatis tl e' proposed paelkw d/` r�` fo the "not
part" `Tots staff -dotes that the City
��standaxd. for a curb-
" -adjacent sidewalk= calls for a `ig ni %isn. six .fd }; foot wide..
4not
J',
Z,
includir the, =curb).` This would ftH salt in
(iniMuO "Qarkway tedtlr "Of 16 feetP 1'1e situ (6) foot
_ ,
#dewalk, howover,, offers a very sma7't safety margin for
pedestrians. 'With the , anticipated i raffi�,, ; vo'lutrte and '
Speeds along Fast,Ave,,aes�'`a six, foot! lk could be
t�
Utilized if there f s. iarndscaped area drat could a used., '
tO avoid vehicles* this.t veht of -an rvency. with the-'
fires,- tail PVC fence at the flaI<
C of t4 ide al6.'s a
wnfWm eight (o foot W16-6 _sid��alk should be provided
i
adjacent to the curb to allow NO -4 "" omfort zone" for
Ij pedestrians (see Exhibit qt "i
111. BfC �'lElllbATii?!l: Staff rQC ni a,_ "� + "`'
0A the Planning Commission `
CGVa era a t SerrtS of, rihe pr9P T and provillQ Ore Gtidrt "
a
1'11t4
staff On the desired - Alto rnO ive`SO ��;. ro er advertisement of
the . srraft3r trail location tan be made<'` proper Will then
be schedu ted for f he,Tar�rr3rag �;ap�nsaian as .a` public heaping,
f5�7,(k li1lYwsi' C'
PUkNNIW COMISStOW STAB REF6E1 l I
? (� ESPJ 88 -A2 - City �f Rancho �ea�rs:�2�t w }.
`JyUO8 p
get ted;
rF_ c ti
c
aB:5�9;vc
AttachmWk Exhibit - "A" E.xfstM9 C pity Trail: Plan `7`r
Exhibit 2 000 ad C�nunit�y Twai1. Plan �.
f ;A1terAative ' -
'% Exh- ibir "� PrOp6 unit: Tram
At��natfve 2 �
�•.�, Exhibit "R" -.A opd�s - fit �v�r�0e`�caian.
Exhii "S" - "`t a Fart" Est Sec.tic #modifiedarkarz�r ,
�L
� v*
—ANAL Iwo
r,
0
a
r%
K
v
z
e"
fit....
-.
AMhL
r` PY
F
f
*�
f
LLI
MY OF RANCHO CUCA.MiONGA t
DATE; June it; 1988 .4 Y
TO :. :.` airman and liember, -M the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City P7°aane
BY: Nah�Y 6hq. Associate Planner
d SUBJECT: EIiVIRONFtENTAt, ASSESSMEMT AM DEVELOPMENT REVI(M. 68 -10
1}�r - e eve opMen o ase a
�ne g o out cc Mial shOP.0h4' center,, consisting of two
ratan : buildings to -talln 14,$00 ',squara feet on 12.96
acres'df land within an Approved shopping center in the
Neighborhood COMercial District located at the flortheast
corner of Haven ^and Highland Avenues' APN 201- 271 -65
and 71» c
1, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: = `
A. Action Re ested.' Approval ox Detailed Situ Plan a �.
e"9eva� qns, an ssuarce of Negative Declaoiti n
B. Surroundi g Land Use and Zonin .
"SiTngteyow Residential District (2 -4
dwelling units per acm-1,
South - Vacant! Low Residential 4istrict,(2 -4 dwelling� units
per acre),
East - Apartments; Medium -Nigh Resid%ntial District (14-24
dw��llin units per acre), .
West - Vacant,- Condominiums: Gas_tatien,'! Offic
Professional Mow -Medium Residential Dict (4 -8
c4aetling- t►riis ps�,acre), ,Meighborh Commercial. .
C. General Plan besi nations��
9 eC w 5604 Carrenercidt �-
North - Low:Density Residential (2 -4 felling units per acre)
South - Low - Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre)
East - NedicP-liigh Density Residential (14-24 dwelling units"
per acre)
Wes - Office Professional, Low,*dium Density Residential
(4- dwel I ing,unittper jCwe), Neighborhood,"
Crcial e
D. Site Characteristics: The site is rough graded with turf as
-eros on con ra » ; utih If the.,$roject site is the future `
Interchange of the propdsediFoothill FreewaY.
PLANNI14 MISSION STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT° RWEw 88 -1O - RvERSIFI_£6
June 8, 15$8 =
Rage 2 _
E. parking CA ulationsr
Type .s' Square Parking t;iberof Number of
Space., r Spaces
of Use n Footage s1. Ratio Required Provi &d
Retail No. 8 11,20+ 11250 - 45 46
Commercial Pad 3,600 1,!250 14 14
Existing Center
minus pro ed
�0onald `s 1,13J 50 444 ' 497 " LF
Union 75 27 3 per bay 11 . " 1_._ 1 _.,
�4 TOTAL 44 ra67
II. ANALYsis: I�
A. General'. The site is Phase 11�� of the Raven village Shopping
U emirs °On %ptember. 24, 1986 ,` the Rldnniing fission
conditionally approved this Phase�$I, r411 Conceptual Site
The 'developer is now requesting dign revie"r of the Detail` i
Site Plat :and elevations for °c two retail buildings as
shmi,,16 Exhibits "B" and 00% The `"fires (i�Donald's has
submitted a separate Conditional Use Pe "which will be
reviewed by the Planning 'eMmiss'iog at a la er date when the
project has completed she Technical and Desisrt' eview
process. The existing siggnalifaed driveway onto Haven�11
will be- wi'dened -with the future development of MCDonaId\I and
Unocal,
B� Design Review Colerittee: The Committee (HcW �) Tolstoy,
o eman ) revi_zW'Tffft_'ProJect on 'April 21, 1983 and Yecommended
approval subject to tWfollowing conditions:
1.o Continuous pedestrfarf, connections should be
provided from the west elevation around to the
east elevation for proposed Retail No. 3. The
same ciansistent textured material for tke W,
Pedestrian walkways should ; be
Pedestrian ameaties such as benches andf
standfnktrellitwork should be provided._
2. 11he storefront design for Retail No 3 should be
consistent °with the theme established in the
J center that is " " " w
" y *Pop outs and recesses...:
3. Additional architectural details such as river
rock 'treatament�, should be provided to the south
a, \
and-west elevations of the cercial pad.
Al PLANNING COMMIS
SION ON STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -I0 - DIVERSIFIED
June -B, 2988
Page 3 �\
low
4. Vint pockets should be prodded aionji the east
and north elevations of the commercial pad.
S. River rock treatment should V: provi4ed to the °
'south elevation of Retail No. .3,, ;
6v The landscaping work G& the °zaitransji r09h -of-
way should be completed prior, to issua;lce oV any
permits.
ii
Ca Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed Part �ill of e
nv ro-Men a ec s and found that wsigt .it adverse
environmeptni imrpac s will ocsfi� as result f th s.pro ect,
Further, a Negative Dec7aratfinn was issued fa the previously
approved Conditional use Permit fir this shopipirrg center on
April 24, 1986, i{
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The projgct ,ft consistent with the General
a e o ec vet of the Development Code, and lithe purpose of
the' district in which the site is located. The proposed use and
Site Plan, together with the conditions applicable t� —to will not
be detrimental to the pudic hea`�,tn,, safety, o 41fare or
materially injurious to prope�rtims or improves is ins the
vicinity. The proposed and Site hlani, tog �!'her with the
recommended conditio,s of approval„ are in comp iancl wftk each of
the ,,Applic�b7e provisigAz. of the Development Mde and City
stanZiids.
IV, .,REC.DMEMDATION: -Staff recownds the Planning Commission approve
ve oPmen Review 88-2D and issue a Negative Declaration.
Respec I IY /t ubmitcted,
Br• d'Bu ler
City Planner
BBaNF :te
AttactKents: Exhibit "A" = Previously Approved
Exhibit or - Detailed Site Plato
Exhibit "C°' - Landscape Pla.*_ ( :. -
Exhibit "D" Elevations d:
Exhibit "E" - F7o6r Plan ',f
Resolution of�Approval with Standard Conditl ns
01�
`J J
' �:�, � r �`�' .�' - ` "'_"— �' *•ate iw ", ,
'.- `llil� Aff-i
t
� �I•r i �" �l t �
rB —i E-1
IL
i
t
5
act i
A I w
Lb
, Z.
W o l-4
'f �t
Adak
mg
\ m a.>'rwr S. �!err�pmy✓�s. g�wmes.�a�aa�y' �`y= ^'., -+ — -
1 ae -per•. a-n. ••suca mac:— .s.;� _
Zr"- a� • "c+cv + f . y t
it
NORTH
w -s�M1Y 6 •.RM r1f ral ae�y. Mw� j' _
S rrnr _ .Al %R 1
— a.M (`� fa 't••.S4w'�t'+.y, �' ` _ '� iii. r.
S
4 ,
- tea /t..yp � - •� �.7• �— .a�arl.o���`%�a•�we� �'.�.�A � ar - N'!a•� l L..r •mow.-
_ITY
TITLE
' EXHBIT:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING :DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO, 88 -10 FWr WO RETAIL
WIWI- 5 TOTALING 14,800 SQUARE. FEET WITHIN 11 tiAVENd
VILLA SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER v
OF HAVEN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE IN ENE �NEIOHBORHOOD
COMRERCIAL DISTRICT - APN,. 2T;;.271 -55: AND 71
A. Recitals.
fi) Di'arsified - Properties fans filed .act applicdtion.-for the
approval of netie?:Amen"t Review Ito. 88-!C as described in :the bile of this
Resolution, Herei *i'(after 'In this Resolution, the Abject �evelopd,�efs� Review
request is referred)Nto as *the application*�
(ii') on e' 11th of Play,. 1988, :the`Planning �ommissiort i f the City,
of Rancho Cucamonga4 oiducted a meeting oil the appl ca ion and co9tinued the
project to the June ?.38 regular meeting at the request of a applicant..
�.
s (iii) 04 the 8th` of June, 1,996, the Planning Commission, of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the ;application and
concluded said hearing an that date.
(iv) Ail legal prerequisites to the adoption of toss Resolution have
occurred.
8. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by, the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga As folT�rsa
1. This Commission hereby specifically f14S that all I of, the, facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A,.of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. ' 8(se `dJaapon substantial evidence presented to this COWS ISion
during, the above�,�ferenced meeting ;on . 11, 1988r including writttljN and
oral staff reports, this Commission herWyj specifically finds s,,follows..
(a) The application applies to property located at the
northeast corner of Haven and.14ighland Avenues with .a street frontage of 830 .
feet and lot depth of 445 feet and is pYesently unproved with a 91,191:sQuare
foot shopping center; and;;'
fb) Thy property to the north of the'subject si,s{is single
family homes,: the property to the south of that site is vacant*, the property
to the east is apartwnts,.and tt property to'the west is vacant as -Well as
existing condominiums, and
�1
(c). The proposed Detailed Plan and elevations com p ly °with:
the Mastar Plan and architacturai theme established for this center..
PLANNING COMI$SION RESOLMON NO. °
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89.10 :- DIVERSIFIED
Page 2
. 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented`to this C fission.
during the above- reference, meeting and upon the specific findings of facts
r "t set forth in paragraph 1� and 2 aboxe,�th.is Commission herb 'Finds and
\Gconcludes as fol7&i ;,�
` Ja1 That h .,proposed project is consistent with
the objectives of the General Plan, and
l
t6J „That, the" proposed use is In accord with" the
1
6bject1ve of the Development Grade and ',the:
\�
p urposes of the district in which' the site �s
located; and
(c) That the proposed use is in compliance with ,y .
each of the applicable provisions of the
'
Development Cade; and
(d) That the proposed use, together faith the
conditions applicable the",to, will not be '.
detrimental to the 'publiC. healthy safety, or
welfar , or materi ly inju:Ious to properties. ;s
or is,p� +dements in�.h vicinity.
4: This Commission hereby
AOL
finds��and certifies that the: pro eeehas
`6een'vt- eviewed and considered in caapliance "Yi�th the CalfforniA f-, ironmental
Quality Act _of 1970 and, further, this Common_ h re - soes a Negative
Declaration.`
,
5.- Rased -upon the findings and conclusions set forth in oaragViph
1, 2 and 3 above, this, Commission he �+ approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forthIlotu and in'' the attached Siandard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference
j Pla_ nning Division` �1
r
U) Continuous pedestrian connections shall.be provided
that lead, from the west elevation to the south and
wrap around to the east elevation for the proposed
f Retail No. 3. Pedestrian amenities such as benches
and free standing trellis work shall be; provided
within this area. Detailed design shall be
Q
subjected to City Planner review and approval.
(2) The ,stare ,,front design for Retail No. �3 shall be
consistent with the i�neate ap rowed in the center,
'pop
i.e. outs* artd "�� esses"
i� (3) Additional architectural details such as river rock
treatment
shall" be prpvided to the south n west 4
elevations of the coiwr�rcial pad. "
tc
OLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION N0. �
CEVELO°MEWr RVIEW- 88-Iq DIVERSIFIED
June 8, 1988
i
ii
C>
(41 Vine pockets shall be provided along the east and
north elevations of the commercial pad.
(5) River rock- Areatmen'� -. all be pe.ovided, to the south
elevation of Retail No. 3._
i;(6• The landscaping work fur the Caltrans right -of -way
Shall be completed prior to issuance. q any permits.
171, All color and material used shall be the same as in
' the existing shopping center..,
(S) All future signs shall, confom to the 64or" sign
proa6im as e4tablished in tho Haven Vi age �opaing -;
Center.
(9) the site be d�jveldped and r;aintaini) irr`''
accordance with 'the aFR fed ite Puns Wch
includes architecturaI77 elevations, exterior
materials A�.d colas, ndscaping, and grading) on
file with t i Division, the conditions
contained herein, and D %Yelopment Code r�egulatipns,
. Ena3neering Division
(I? A traffic study and implementation o6 the study
shall;; >be - requ.red prior- to the issuance of any
building permjts for the 11,200 squire foot retail
building,, The ;study shall include, but not be;.
1imited. 'to _ the following. 11re appropriate widths3'
019ninent, �radfius, Mid right turn appro#ches for
both , ys on ",. a east , side of Wt #n Avenue
between Lemon, and Highland Avenues. In"' addition,
the drivoWay aisles shall be studied for sufficient
width and capacity.`
(2) Amin- lieu fee for one -half the cost of the future
11 cons:- action of the median island within Haven
Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Highland Avenue shall be
paid to the City prior, to the issuance of building
permits.
;.. (3) The easterly.Side of Haven Avenue shall'he improved
Southerly. to High -and Avenue.
t¢) '' The existing overhead Utilities ( iecommunica� ions
and electHtall on the protect side of Haven Avenue
Shall be undergrounded from the existing terminus
South of the southerly driveway,;te the first pule on
the south side of highland AvenueNprigr to public"
improvement acceptance , occupancy, whichever
occurs „first. The developer may request a'
s.
�t t`}f J
. i�L. ppNwM+2Q,yygMD�R
AMU
.'1C t1.°.AS•*'..ito�sv _a� 3Y�� ,`s"'a..° .`' fo rFwzN'
N dYw �� ,CM.M�V� N4 w'L•ry CY�Y ��y�r �i
■R'1+4 as qs vC
bt
�w •s,. a ' r tea• wQ S♦ yip '�° ., �$'+• 7r
Af v; jr JrVlj
s xl. � � � .
O � � �, iii�Ei � ■ `
L� .Ti g ,
7P
`i M
we
IL
T•• r � � � Mw �4 9Yw�.�y
10 Jr64. -1 - -
ild
1pP •yy � ��_vssl � C �' q � rp :,l�A �vN B�R �i•Y.r�.
j yrr J N, i9 ��•' 1fi.
i
<��
3'2uy:°I
...�._._.__.YL4 4ww..____ t:... R uw -�.�� "" _5 L._.__.dFxjg�:L-- .�•g•_ . 2 A-.:.._._
is
„mss -b
gaze
-u Y �% ".'...� � Ls 1 Nei
N y y
N Yp •
X y�,` ,��
�NM~
O O 6 tr, o��.r d
¢Yi1M 11.3a iV, .. L��` { Am
M4M. �1 N 3 q
to
Y 'q
.°."'K'p+�r'4�a
WyYy�ot -ax
c '
ir ��� � •' � 4�N8'��� {s.N ppl. 4 �1�;�y��
-'re' GS ,t$ '' ++
� `# Y i Ise 14 .5
Mimi ~® u ,Ya ^ q 4frz I�
12 RVAN
Iii` 11- 11 � ;b,
m a. s rig w�yyy 2y ;_p .31 il"� �
&V Gwx' Vs �y5 M �C VC �_ p� iA��/w., it rii7 �y+yp+y,Q
.ni...s� s .�; a.�,IJly mA '., i �g •�'4. ��w� w�'��Q$ a`
a 0
CY May «�NN.O ywNaI�S 1.
�S_24,
,p Yy yW. GGGGG R L. � yw�6y C $ 4\
��. tv a -vc» ���x i {1Gy� ..0 s..�v U6•°. '].may, 6 '� a'a�a
�+ y
s °jai
r : j,
U
QWjty
c°..c►rig�r+.ti
r�a5 c.h N i acS ,tm&S~Liw'�3�Sr'��►y,. u'a�a C Cy a
1 ~
Sq RµJ = �'"`«YE3Q 8 !lam
V wN N S yY6 V` #�•„y.V It aesQ wu:fpyT'.�:.�µ
{ir .'sH.=�6 k-f� 4`♦p'•iL = Vpp vNN Mytl
YO rfYYYYY=��t l�p11M N. >_ MY S M(�VY r Y' M.N. ^M Cam+
Jt
a C• ■N 1� ®Ili O� .YS V� M .1a Y•t'OgGMMlY E y NY^!'s
IN Y� ~{ lv 1.. •,�, Cai LN
_ °per r3i^� aX P $ .�'��� r �� $��
1-6 y pp M�me. 2 j�j� yp N .OpYp y.
12,
Y. Q-��i, ^P �� Y�,�y�•j CN.�,
E�4i l�ry 0. � • ✓� r;u 'q .2 �' � ~I^ i
r] .per a+a ►ylN L''♦aN ma,:Fl�w
^`$tom
o +�� os care. Yi 'wZ� ?�iL.�Iej". 1�'i ffi
arV 11Yy LK :M Y�`f 5���peyiLMy,; X`wy.♦ l�p� fl y•' !+�
YsYYa«pS};O ■L �!' f4 Nyy @ley, `$OPL�'��� Tr'•12cai
LNf.
RYSw - •+CL R+C� y Oc �g $CY
Hw.NOM ale Nr <N �M +D hiri �7V4�PN•���V14 �. x 'C iw � f•E' ���OM
'!
A' TS +c
cam" cc
Y Op Or •may It N Y ¢aa j�j I R¢ L,Pa+
E L w Y y
KN�E a-s p.y •
g¢ L s a_
�� Fv M��.
+q �
(I 8I $'rY. r. s N L �� � e-
12!
aiS CC a � yw
JS
tT yY� 46��r,1.
y (E[ ' ;b 0
3— e a'I,��`qY
.G�!if •. p .uU yy -Fla
S�
w+ N � V b> /N� }ra� }gip 1♦�C
Va Yp�w Y N� ♦ I N :', �Pmi 04rfwN• .t 5} C^ tt. I{/i4M T
ae Y."� ape c$.:... '^qo yal � ti, �"�� "("' �r- `•.�L'N., .+��a�af��
`N9
@EO `. r�R'y V6� �y1' Yk Gi µ '40 i9ywy ML �!s 6
k• Ji w• y. y 'O. N MV ACS ~rM EM Yy NWT
N `teaa NyO , TCa yya NL'� •Y�Oi+. _.+�V.# Xy ai1i
Y K4 L C Y N~ b4i4 yE1 bN".� K
O•SpN Y� gppp4t +T mr 6
O!c'�+yw. ;
.R yy[�. ys
+`4
.�` �}f }�w.. »yN,4piy Li
yN kC. 6iT: .FQ0•.ei +ii .ft 13 W'4
'y�i iY ■¢�tY`� !!es._.,
�■c'O�
ti-A
.5. uri` � Y.}�� LL flYYC.•.YC. �. ��a� y! YWr4 Lx�� � �� _
(.i w-i3 TiY Gi�G LZ`� � � Lr�Y4K� V�Ay���il�r1 ,YY yY.
its
Y.YoM air C.M� -YjH �w � i tar/• M��"n. rMr f$4 �.x .r
.�`yQ��S 1 3H 1Wir Tj Ua+ .1 vs2z'i
ad
F am �j :sr � rR. M dry Te � x"�c"�.. 101�.,.1 �d•
r
�;p wee g
all Alm
p_
dg LeW g N V':M • ,....W i� Y�
TN •A i tipr+�4 M.PI
�Yy �Yg= �•�j3�3�}{
V �' `• � Gy �Y% ��CIM. �� r. i71 ��1". Y ey��a.K� �.ly Gyj'+i�. � � �.Y�l
Y
atilt
is
Aft
I � s
6 Y.
'!`3 t Y
YVi/ Yp f O� N 1Jq Y
�O
r�rC
qq
� � _~ Y US
a COS
tit
' '�^ �' � �' i4 +��y�� •Yi3 �. ��� �,,, �.yr rum ;;M �. �`�`.
"K .11
LA' Ass
EPA iN 8 1-N .{DIY e iY ,y i[ 3y,u $- •.
.-
r_tYMu.,.� r YN ^'6 +:+ �� -O �A� ^ 01�Cy4 ■y
y
S u
M
a
U
f w
w i "mil
Y
ui'D t
ab
s y yVa Y L Y N
L N V US
ii F"a Y� yy• C ��`� V Y # N •
4 o�M NwDaTi aw$i ) µ, wr yn.
FR g'..:. o" L
m`° = ° "far i
o$��.,M'$ S �A
o�_M>> °bpi e q _nag
-cwt VNw Y•�.� �� �M �': -�
E Vi��• Q
051 34$ :yayy�� F N 1J, Z
W O S N •i
411y. S
31 L
jr
me- tag
.1 bra
IL
1
4 � i 2a
2C »'
4S Ox
i 7 w y'. 1C U:�. rLQy/.pM al
M. tsl.RL i� i� y �q[ psis
• r
�+ ySii% `1.Nii wqw ^• ,91
,✓fit
L�'�fDpi•,,�_S \��0�
.. WN
ILI
Lo
o
�o °i L t reel
o +
t L ® ju
p �
��� Y ssn! �� CMYY Qt 1lyQ
J $i .ao .x.5716 Y f i iw
S.- L. N yc N ,5 Q{WWWWW mi
" 1.- O Y, �M VN ti M i i i>r
40
awl
ri
LA 28—
to f. �> �y.N �� 1�LxSt ',� � ®'J�,�,m•'�r "«' 9 a+�'-` _� ,its s�' e _
^a � Ag � �,<: 1.r'L M, ���� s "` N #�,� c'f•,° �.`m. o - ���e�r^�'•3 1
wia
y
MV � 17 M
fig$
fl
Y L w Ki fi . N .: gyroµ. �
N. M ,@� � A q � - Jf yy Yr
y y vy
I if'�✓tli`;
why,; I -TI
`L LL15
i �
v
r
L a
ST q
e�M. yVyy
r YYV
2 Yp ®M s �
C '
r
ar ,o.ar y4
p Y � ry. .O O M 7 Cf y > 'A Co � � gCr• {�
H v o s Al > o -Z
g z C fl f p
ya V K A f
qI�
„Y�,� N WE
-it � --s �.,.a
4'qL 6L' °, a • Q�,y�5 �. z fi
YM'1 �' .1R QO !yqM
VYY., +�� -• Lam' Yl�i, mp F
Zw `u $uy c ►y a „ l°y0. Jw�
Nom, �Au �i'41 3' �� E ,'a t�7 /w4� -p•
S +i� ate,, Y 11
tt
Ir
c. R E c.: '�'.', j.. U
W Caw
. �i } _" •Ci H:.'yi l.. �Ca .:^ s�3'a :.ac irA
- t
:• SQ' M A 1
,
- Q VIC OF RAItiG�� ©�o�ICAIiiOONGA L -� ✓ ��
ns
DATE: Jpne 6, 1988 -:
TO Chairman .ard Ft fibers of the tPlanning rq6 ssfon f ,
n r _
PROM: _ _BrrLd''4ulle.r, City Planvfr f .
SY: Cir;ty' Harris, ; Assistant Planhe`r' j
SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW .FOR ."FENT4IVE TPJkC.T�'566 -: CAftYN -� The ~ «y
et sign review, o u , l gw eleevation fist -an - W a � d ;a "tte
Pla,-O` of W sin r6�' ily -'ptt Qf .a previously �ioproved
tentative; tiract� map Ms $ Wka 6VA4 single f. ily: lots
on 7:e -6 acres, o land in 1'tih Loa trensity R dential''
I District (t- 4;fdt�elling unite Per. acrL)�,�yncatod' on the
r
south side �i24th Street, i of` .4irtzifi Sullocie Road -
F 226 -ZII: Z,
J R�LJ�ETEQ FIDE` Tree R�mvali. ennit `B8•S4
4 I. PROJECT AND SITE DMP'tPT:ION: <
A. Action Requested: Arporval of building elevations, tiftLeptuai
gra ne,an �p o fplais_arid issuance of a tret'.removal permit.
B. Pro3ect Gen, Sity `x.27 ellin unff2f per acre
C Sur cur in` Laltd Use and zonin .
rt.'!',. "- acaa oun y !UT 5a n err,ardi`no 4,'Qent a'f 2,,
Re entior, Basin,, , open Space
Easy, ?Retention Basins, *dr Space
Ne ' - 'Vacant; Low Density_#esictlnti64 (24 dwelIIng units
';per acre)
D... General. PlanDesignations a -_-
ro ec —S a - "scow= uf, nsity, i,.dsfdentiall,(2-4, dwelifn'l unfits per
Aceg) /
L North - .very Row Donsity, Resi Chtial (Less than 2 dwert ng
units per,A,6re'a
South - Flood :Bontriol
East flood C trll,.
Kest Low Denxiiy Resident ial (2 4 *sdling units per acre)
r'
Site Characteristies, "The ite�, is 'currently+ aaiant with an
avert+je slope o ;�"rom norf eta sQUt°� There j an, existing,
windrow+ .on the north properk 1ine"'Opd a .cord o oiiY� t
along tt9tr =a l �p rtv 1ina,.` Th 'proje is bo ded I t om
rtclrt[l r y R" rar J it -' Stme , to the 04# and soutfs by _5an l
$ernardir�� .�nnEy ;i-'Toad Control dr.straicV'�etention basjjts and
j to- the `roast „by a Eucal�(+¢.aat wtidrnx and vacant property; ) ° Y
4 �TM
#,
.z?a i7 . .
p A4 ` KG�� 4iS I0M SiAFE ItCPOIIi } « , C7" , C
3 - £aryA f
'
�'8, , 19$$
°
IT
ANALYSIS.,
7,1 Plz
A Beak rotirtd: Ten tiv �fira N � 1356ti on - �
r+s oriinatly approved by
� a VIA a Cs1oniss�on onx'guly 2�, 188 as a cunt�sr,' lot �r
su6divi for 261 single ¢aiai.lr lots. „ In order` to achieve
tht min and ,average„ lot sizes reg4lred >for this) district, °
r( <P?F' the; Conditions of approval, ilje applicant has reduced e
"total "huOtber of lots .,to I 154 ereby ,reducing, the pro +. t
« c�� �6en,sity fvw 2,4 to ��.27' dwey_ . units per acre. ?.ot sizes
for tract tange'in sf2i ft 9m 10,067 to 31474 sgdare. feet w1th,
an average size of 15„027 t.'
s.. Setierar the applicant is PC ,00n a total;` o $ floor p an ` <
�.tilu8es t^evers pfans'� eachfyhvatio »s..,�.ihe
unit design Is_ fair
jy ;. contemporary ° 0th,,. xter1or, "ct$�ta Ling
.reswhling , 4` basic architpcturalli, styles: Country ° Esiate,
v C liforni 'Ranch, Bungalow, .and- l�itctorlan. `Plans 1 and ;1 are
single story,�antf plans '3 and 4 t!re`66 story...- *floor plans
range tai size from^ 2,35Q,s�u M fee'b td 2,945 Sq4, re feet.,t:. 1 �_.
Dust n Review Comkittee: 6n Ja nary 21 19813 C7olstoy, �_
r "auk an'Aprl ,rick, ,Chiiea, �
Kroutil ) -the Design Reviear .Cm r .rt wed the, project and
rpc\ ensted auprpval t5u r`t to ttte fall ngf
L Th aw the _ 11p of ica r"�t", sut pit a ieiter' to, . the Pl a »ni�ng %�
,C si n �`confira�%n that verification of ''the =high dater �!
Tavel ,, i` O : adlAcent to then eastern property 'line is
required prior to recd, '4ation ,�.�f the aka and further -:
confi rming tisa t h: eye t-mf a deviation the property
will require red �hi As 3 and K}.
2. �; Th �{ae� a `� h�� � ' {� r� pp alt shcull?� an arborist s �e port r
prepahed o.19vestigate t 'f4asibilitysof relocating the
existinq '014ve .,ruts -along the east pre erty line, _to the,°
upper` sl0k.of th+a, -flood eon�7, t levy *,, as „prdpQSed.
Note • After` a '&v +ew AF the 'tir'ee. arboriit`s reports
subMhted A�� ,'Faul�'< `A:- pagers'��4 �Y -Palyf and, ;�ls$=iaktes
(EAlbit � ; staff recc, nds ti�at of tl�s” fees be
preserved end transolantem,(trose lasted In'Vroups i -and ZD
2)' and thaat. the raining 2g trees ,be' removed. Staff ,,.
"suggests that those trees which arr "wad _ sltoulcl be
replaced with 15- 94110n size olive U,4s.on a:i -to-41 basis
and that their shct04 be planted on t�e roost_ slope of tt:�
flood "Control
ittdt d off -siie e4sojn s _jequtre4 €r6A .flood, control
_; st aid be obtatined prior tQ recordati ► of the final vap.
U
O.`�r
PLANNING C4AUION WAPf REPO;ZT f
TT 13566. - Caryn �
June 8,19�a—•
4. That the we.a let r of authorization from the property owner to
st 7-41`11d be received prior, to sch dating, for the '
Planning. Com'rission and ; sho"O"d' state .a prokai of the
proposed 'slope - easement,, potential main epance of the
slope and tide yaj of any tF'ies (Exh a i Li
In addition; the Committee expressed can rn' with regard
to the maintenance of the Of-site elope cement. Staff
suggexts that the slope be Olanted for erosion control artid
ghat the developer maintain a t nrkiy it� igi�ttion of the .
slope f #r period of 6 months coclsi tent w3tir the
standard requirement for °slope' planti�e or custom Tat
subdivisions..
S. ` Thp Committee, found the idea -or an,, ante treatment on
Susmit AvenuO attractive but eat ressed cc n regarding
maintenance (Exhibit H). The following rec', �hdations
were lade subject ta,,the Planning Coi►iaission r ew:-
a. That this area be included_ its part ,of thk* City's J
Landscape and X31ftt nano,pi rictl and ,
b. If a portal .design is `to be d
use the treatment should .
be consistent on both sides of the "�9trekt (PBk)
including sidewalks; and
c. That C4 natural' rock Werial be ed rather than
manufactured -stone veneer;_ andt�,It similar
decorative treatment be provided th l lower loop
intersection. ,
Staff su est� that if a � � r
gg n Pntyrtreatmen>~��.Tecended '
by the PlannrIng Ommission that a canditiOn be" add#, such
that., the design of the entry.-monuments be suba2ct to
review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior a�
to issuance of building permits. )
6. That a permanent wall treat* (rasher than 46W fencing f -
should be utilized along the western property line- unless
a map has been approved :ors the adjacent 06stern' property 1J
at the time this praiect is to constructed, in,.Aio`t case
a'
% ;w¢od fence mq be 'utilized. ' Re wooe4gnging�would thous -
reVeive a consistent paint or stain treaialt, : o
T. The Committee r?Sorwended that a naturIIl�sip..e be #ilizedv
for MY fieldstone veneer. _kktwever, fair, 'other typed of
' St�ne, m3nufaetured veneers may be cc sidered subject to
furtherl( design �revie�i prior to iss ance of building f
permtt%,
Ix
~
C
ILAtlIaENG,C iTSSE �4 SiRF REPORT
�
TT 135 Car ai'
June., 1888
Page' 4 t.
4 8. That color;. sehme #3 should t13� revieayet�fi by the �ia3ign
jj Review Co mitten prior to issuartte of building'pe!rmit .
9. Perin *ter walls tin4luding wAls' along Street anci_
of
r{ = cor�ser sideyard walls shoal be required and should be
} designed witlV`deora3ve tre�ni<.;
i0. That w_4150 architectural d6taflini, shall be rov4ded ott a2i.
sidend�;raari ele�itioss. �'1
il. arplysl4# on type probl, o�y a3 c�nyfii>rts
}TThatp % >tyhe
;yap�a
,0¢a�t }(. 4-10,
with �Vi; � �i 3 7'�;IF i/5 't kn4S1 7 91n � ®A yltli�
°'arr The #Hvemys shall, not exceed a dt�ki of &� tftrough' the ^
.public: right -wrdr ,, o ,
0. Tee-, foal .ReVi �caWttee: ft, - 'aIuar, 19, M and Aprii .5
1988-
F was reY ,,wec# by the Techzaical (R€vi , Comg a ttp�
approved c e, iP iiffpiftioai, listed im the'
Resolutio if Ln n
�
E. gratiia °. Cottee The plan was' rwwed by -thewadis9,
u s¢vera l: asiota i nuary 1 1388 Nbruany '1�,
19hls, February, 88x�Ana`fl w., 3988M Z, 193 :and Zip
1988) aFpraKed 44 ect 'the
t4, cap ditlons li tesi an >he,,'
ResoluVP .
F. ira.ls tiso f o t et �. ebrii r 1r; #.985, the jrails
HFi4� Q k:Q li reviewed Oe� proposed $1'$� ea Et ��3t1�' bi* r
A,r . �l'I,tt tisiei! Oe applicant ,, prA %ted ihl ormati oW
,
redentl,y 6btai�� " frm a 5�,ftrur4,46 C'oi �nty .rood Cont-1. .
`the helet,,.df �tl 'ttigli'wttt suI:el irL) Otfin 'the 4 F_�*vire Spreading 8asint phi 00 edC "
"the
house .pads Xlk= -to -, tke raSt 'Property line hav AT fe be
raised .
'
. appraximatejy S�1Q fret ,,&Oat .nntlaral padii« This
MUM Mel tV4 rOmval of v the exiosting alive trees and
'
le ie -- %ei g to a ilae# control
wy vrhicbcal7ows for a:.leael trail s +;:'dace,
Y.
4, The apt�licant'ls Propos ng t� F'�4r_t� s Eucai tut, within
YF
„)Ondrow
the ,trail easnt Adjacent tq 2tae Fer,�aeter, waft fob bh
the, Reuel -lea and easterlyy equeSti'iere traiis, Atiditdnal
lanlSCa#atsag;, °
a
will also tfe adder�i ta. the west side of the food
$rol
„ ,r
co levy.
ilro 4 a ittee rq`r tided aFpr y E of Elie trs 'E ` sign :part
y ttia the � i ,cif the.:trali,;'taidsc�apin9� C 0 r`�tUj#4,j x1�apet
aft ' iith taaadard
sat,� 35et_ wid h -hoo d be, a
ajn n ;f 17' free anid cletr
,
c °3 t�
tib o-
PLANKING CQIN USI0N`,#AFF REPORT
TT 136666. - Caryn
June 8, 14$5
Page 5 _±
G., Tree Removal. st.a re =ui of the offs .te slope ;:'easement
Propose a ang the west p'ropel'ty line portians {of thez`eff -sfke_
Eucalyptus taindroi ,144y have. to Fe reMoved. Hors "ter, the exact
`
deign and extant 'df this slope easentnt .is su sett to change.
the flood zone dgs gnatien' on� the FUM
We eral Este; envy :j,
Mana9ement Agent?, p is' - changed, and the 'flood
redesigned. Thlrrefor? Staff retbon6nds that a .condition be
added thaV-the� e��plise�stybe °required to submit
a ttYee'_irdmoval , �,
permit te,, recordaziono of thP`, fina7i {vip in -ordp to:
address the. proposed, remo�i �] Of any portion tit'`this windioi al'd
any replacement plartiietg; t
�tA Landscapi'�Pursuant - to the requr_�e�t ,of ,the�c'ti�r�nda '
p� c an, t. ke applicant, , required 61i%$ ilI street:; side
landscaping, which is defined; as,��;;,landae, ping in .tk�e Front
andfor sidr~yrds abutting' a street* `, ard� shall include" at a
minimum one 15- 901017 Vze trf*, one o6-gall on size tree � seeded
groundcover .,and' a peter nt irri�itien' system, Ihis
reguiremern applies ifi` al 2Qfi h6 dfstricts ex cept tho
estate
residential (ER) f D
The inteni Itehfihd' ttee; >requirement :for, street, Side: 1'andsi: pin el
is evidenced ; ,n .the policies of the; £tiwivtda 5pecificjr- laa; ,r
t�iFtich indca that in order td reinforce c pity.. idNttitit�^l; '~
k
and: to cr, a+e a -sense a #, coq
tipltity with,n as ar a, - approp�iate .
landscaping should e utilized.'- shogld pr9mote
and enhance �ther rural 'character of the, £tlWanda aria
contrf'bute= to a i .fit, gjatity e;tvirot meet /
TFter; apirligant .its$ expressed conFerr with_ this ;� gwirement'at,7d
has asked th4if the. Planning %tx fission' c6irsIder removing it !fur
some of the, fuliowing reasons,
That lots
within., .thfJdiatrict average 15,000 squareee� \t"
!stih a taint t of 10,000 square feet and that prov dfpg
lar� ,cr�pfing for ?,xis of this "size or. 1 -Irgar Weald present
w� anf ? t 1y, large' 4xpense �
>
tta'!�',;atest hemeeowners whEx puttchape lots uf' tart$ size,wou2d
tt
prefer install',.their own land,i apit;g, ,
3. That the landscaping �,Oequire o' is, rjot censistet t ;with
�Jhe Dovelo}xae1tt Code;arhich r quirts frbnt,yard landscapSnr ,
only ynder Site tionai sta7d'ards for the' .ow, Lovr- Xodiu;o, ;
dAedium tKedium -1 `ghn and, High RPst`c nteal Dist?
the ` way`
Of bticdtgrouttd, s fi siou d l i ke`` to ; hole that the
orig,nal draft of the .£ti�hda ` an called ,for` J
�rSpecifit# P;
streetsfde landscapingi° undei+ the Cpt4�jnal 'Standafdsr tlnjy,. , nd
that the lancisr,; rpquir�eme0i for, projects developed =under h �
MIL.,r
WIT
t. r,
PLANNING - CtiMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 18566 ` Caryn
June 8, 1988
" Basic Standards was added `ands adopted at the recd ��3i, off ;the
Penning Gotnission.
Shauld the Pta Commission. Teel "that street side
:a lap Icapint is not appropriate within t�lis district,; an
amen ent to the;Etiwanda Specfic'Plan would bn necessary.
:FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This Project � s 4vns ten x� th the.
�= C ve opmen" ' a n tine General Plan. This pru oCt .0 It not be .4
detrimental to, the adjacent - properties or , ;cause significant
envirnr ntal impactsR Ir±` additioft, the proposed -use and si ;plan
- together Faith the recomended coriditions ,a 'approval-, are in 11
compliance Wth the applidtole .previsions -af the UE�elspment taode
and City Standards.. _ n
V. ' REOMENNDATION., Staff rec nds
S;�ne hat 'the P9inning CorQssiori _
j approve, es gn revieW of the tt<il&i g elevatiotNs and pla Alerts
9fo the'" lots I through the adoptien of the attached -Resolution mod,
L'on�ite r of Approval.
`R sage lye° u6it ;d� Jf
. BradAu er
Cit,} Fxaner' o
'At
tachmed�s.� &'xhiblt "9" 41te apiaa�ttt�€, map
F_
�5y . Vxh bft °C" ' Subdi0sion NO
94hibit 9V Landsc-jAs n b'
tx'kibit "E" Gradinga'Plan „ , r
'jExhibIV "F - El e`tatf ons
Exhibit "b - Floor P74ns.
-hibit "it" - Eh# P t t sign
Fxhib.i" Estr art Detai'�Jrt ProPerty�ine
Exhibit "J" - Letter fkw ,Applicant y
Exhibit; ;l�" - ,:Totter 000 bvf t0-er> ,
Exflbit "L" ;.�, Lettee from ProperWTuners to .he W05t
E iibi €o -W Tr4'Reatovil h iQPlah,
E�thi &tea �tio�#t i2e[5oe ^tS a y `� f,�
*Solution' and ont itions of Appr&,ai
I �U i
woo�ad Ex nC I 'Af, 1.
µwori0u• h rd
.EXISTING CASIN. No.1
�.1•!m ' ,L. 1 - -�•( / ` ,: ISTINO.®A81N - No. 2
• : :4.
_.:-•. .
1 "' •• _ v ti5 \�: (.......... �' —� J. FX12Tlt4G BASIN No. .3
1 P »HMIs -1 � .••
}. -� 222/// \ \\ — .. ` ���..���� • � .7 TiA.q ,
extarA
f ri
ts' ~
�`�" �• /' �`' t'' J'"'a"r `~ �. � 1
" /f' � � 1 , !!- ✓' � _ �' � .�. -��'; ` it
�YAPMA I SAN m"
AAIMM AREA ST1J0�{
' r
(E.• ,:. y ' ...� � t+ S.IdTUaE' &N6Ag9�MiNY Df iASiN No.y6
a _ TITLE'
PLANXI�NG DIVISION
6. Re11 ,Ui' i:!t
lot
t NORTH
CITY
ITEM..-
:$ ,le. . y
v
..r
L r�
r
(t u
-n
Ace=
{ _•rte ���/
{r ip J�
rY }
_ <f.St"� -.. � li .'ate' s� r "� q• Ali jY ut'.. +1
ee,p °�"r� __ +� _,a.,,.�„ '�� .� pry f �•� n
ev
�•y i Jii +oC= 5 y`°'o"� - ..^ "i'..w�,+yr'� ♦�'�g41
Awordo �ew.rayt. y ID �
i
X04 -H
TEE r.
`H M"C A TITLE:
c
IaJi*: ALE; :,
r
�� �... }
ggro r%;{
diTym _tom r
l � � d2 ie'�Prif
N CAMONGA _ 'TITLE. � r
rn n- w
sm
t9 0
SO
r
fill.,
P a
O'
RANCHO �CV�Am?
ITEM.
__ 0701-02 a 6-8-88 PC Agenda a. of 4
Jq-
left
NORTH
MY
CUCA IV �
ITEM,
TrrL E-
DIVISION,
EXHIBIT-SCALE:
t
R > eiP Y calIl. .yP' 1 ni��'.
4.
3
ado � �f ��' � • } k �� �� � z �
_ ;
i
a
V
r
II
�� ate•
�
� �.... ��
C
� �
CA t
{ e
,.
❑
❑
E�
- I
> 1f
i
rw t<• ''
r
i
All
j R" p
pn�,
OP
nn
OLi M
tv
IT Y OF
MANCHO
ITEM
CUCAMONGA,,
TITLE: -- 9 jQV1 � �'
PLANNING DI14SION.
EXHIBIT'-
t �
�
6'
_
r
Ei
CITY OF
ITEM.,
' c . tt} ONG..�
TITLE.-
_
y+f�
r
t
L`
`'i if �: �' •r.,•.. 7tiSr�— , �� +.
AMMk
J. ` U,
i
ri
T .
Jam-
. is
r
A `
s�_ s
.Ia
f'ATXYCPH�0 ITEM
c..�
TITLE:.�.,,.� D'�E7'
�'PLANNING DIVISION,
N ,, ".: EXHIBIT , 'l�SCALBtr
k
t
rm; t �.� � -•� Wit; � �
qq 4i
of r-•.:_• � ,
i=
i � .e •+7f � .mow � � _�� t:
CITY OF
MHO W , r. A TIMM. .1-81-L-i W5
HIM SCAL& .......:.�,.,
I �
I -
� 3
$�lt:':t...
se �
i � J
i � usMeCAnfYr
(
k1l (c tr,jh'V�lt 3) U P. �c AItjk
RANCHO CUQAIWONGA
IJ
G4
I
I
it
1 �
pit t"t M0 7 !f !►�oI[�1 �
�
it Ili Vil' It�141lrII
I` O
-
CT
WCAMONG A
ITEM:
TITLE:
LINDGREN r.T s.ldT �,
�� , ..
may 27, 1988 (d ?t f
it
C4ty Rancho Cucamonga r '
Planning Commission
-9520 ,Aaselihe
kancho Cucamonga, California.` 51730
$ubject`9 FFaA ,�er Level forrIthe San Sevaine Spreading`
;� dIn East. of `Tract N"o. 13566
Gentlemen:
Tract Na. 1356.6 has., bee,�;36deg foot above the ' preliminazy =°
high water level. (H L) 61f the fan Seva�ne Spreading; Basins as
�yi31anssocates
calculat8dl
The' firm of. Fuscde, .Williauls, Lindgren 5 short J (RTES ).`o in rassoci .4. z r.
with 9i11 bland & Associates is c_ Brent -l.y vetifying the high water
level to t?te�atisfactiRr�of the sari Bernardino County Flood `Cantrcrl '
District." verification &Z the high water level will occur, prior to
recordation ,.i,» _ order to satisfy �h6 cbnditi�on of approval. Tn
the event there is � major deviation from the previouslu cal.cq)Lated,;
high water, level kiie site ;(w, ll be-redesiSned to the satisfaction
of the c14, Eng,ineer.
Very truly your,=,}
"USS"OE, WILLIAM t GRV &`r SHORT.
Raymond All d, , P.E ,4,
Project Manage b l
Div cc: Joe Diloz of -The Caryn i 4tmpany
Tim Ung2 , Rc5dkfield_ iv opt;,ei°t
i3i11 Mare , Bi�kj Manz �, A'st0ciates
Jess -dar fib, Land /Plan/ Des's n, Group.
Cindy No-rit, City of Rancho CjsasmUga,.Planning Department h
- G
v
�, ..r• l:" fz 1, A'ttex•xdc
grfvl,.� /f JLwrrly "t`101Ot0W.1�/
gg;;
o
n
2
1
` O
F
C 47
City of Rancho Cuoamq...
f
9320 Baseline 'Road y
~
Rancho; Cua;aytionga, 091ifornia 917.x'0
.Atitentitz Air n�,�1\nose
Engi.neering,,Depg - tt ent
Subject: Grading•Agreement, Tentative Tract'Na 135 6=.
Dear Sir: ^x:,
Please be advised tnat� 1 hereby Consent 'to and agree 'to perm.1t
the necessary gradi,xnq, tree rempval, sIC` Cohsti'uct an and laid-
-
s�ape installation and maintenance ove atfOortioa of my property
adjacent t9 the t
,abnYe refcrena'ed projec -,.as shown on�,the Grading
Plan prepared by Fuscoe,'Will4rist Lindgren & Short, Inc.
At a future dj f ,
:gab %lam- semgnt for the fnreVitg imptovements
and maintenante„pt� �c c ill Lie
i,
.� prepared, �Xecuted .and recorded,
said easement s hA ii cord concurresttly r�r th the ;approval o f the
Grading Plan.
Please .f t free to Oontacey either Mr. Joe Dilorio or myself
if you have• y questions.,
4 er truly yours r
>„
i'ctL M- 'JGHNSON7i Owner
o
Zucam
City of � t� � a Tr s emovatlf `,?Iermlt
EVELOPMEN
Nx
Ordinance No. 276, pertaining to the preservat(6n d0rees on'j9rivate property, requires that no person
remove or relocato any woody plants in excess of fifteen (18) feet In height and having a single trunk
circumference of fift,vn (15) finches or more and mufti- trunks having a circumference of thirty (30)
'Inches or more ( rhe4,iced4,taentyfour` +24) nc, -;e zar�r grvurra [eves), wlthaut first obtaining a Tree
Removal Permit from the City.
�nrr�a,m®
LOCATIONOFSUBJECTSITE: South o/ Sumit Ave !24th Street? East of Ntardmanl8uJlock ltd.
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OFAPPi_ICANT, Land /Pl gn Grouts
230 N u,port C n +mow grim 5uiite.200 NewQOrt�eaGh, CA 92560 f714) 7204198
NAME,ADORESS% fELEPHON90 PROPERTYOWNER (itotherthanapplicant): The_Carvn Company
'I
�1
—'Ry4 T.Qr= Road aguna Beach CA 9 651 x714) 494-7597
REA r; NSFOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sheets): bite (flee +;�•+e ra���ired to meet «"
F1nnd Untralrmen'tc n naaci+a+ r moyal
PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL
-Cut, hill doze and t- em'ova fUlivPC may 6sr boned and
relocated, but will be removed if relocation is not
feasible.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: PATE: A!?i1 4. X88
This application shalt include a plot plan Indicating locatiion of all trees t7 be removed and re 'led,
The species, number, and size of the trees to be removed shall be so desigipated. if a tree is di ,eased,
then a written statement from a licensed arborist stating the nature of tht
,,disease shall be/equired.
CTION
❑ APPROVED
By: 0 DENIED
� t _
Rea ions,
-
Y Date:
Zz 1&tification of application shall be given to property owners Within a three hyndred toot radius ten days
prior to approval. If no appeals kre received, then the permit shall becf me effective ten (10) days from ;the
�? date of action. This approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days from the date of final map te�orda?sn
or building permit lssuari� whichever comes_first. Should applicant fail to rer>tovu "t °t;I Withih dab" 7
expiraton period, f new permit shai �+r.��requfred, unless. an extension is requested fourten (14y days prior td the
expiration of the permit.
Nag ?. .1988 1,
/S IAA
TAX
c
. Steve Kelly
Land Plan Design Group
230 Newport Center Drive
Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 926$'0\ A
Dear Steve: Q 1tiJ �
Re; T.T. 13566 - Olive Trees
As you and the C uca' mcnga have \requested,, X reinspected the
above trees recently with respect to selecting those Olives that would be
candidates for transplanting. The resules'of that inspection fallow.
There are currently 57 olive trees on the tern border o the pxbperjy.
The approach r took an ;his napect�Ean eras to "select only the best treks
Of this group that could be transplanted_ This selection was based On
trees' health, appearance, and the t'easibility of such a transplant. `
As a consequence, I;#ound 34 trees that are possible candidates for trans -
plantCv. I have grouped thew in priority of transplant, as follows:
GROUP l - These trees are, the best candidates :for transplanting as tti*y
are in pood c04 -'tion and appearance, and their trunks are not
tOO''2ar9e; Nos. 12, 22, 13, 240 22, 24, 25 29, 30, X42, 42,
and 43. -
GROUP 2 The follows ( c
n9 tfi ' are your :next best randidat;es for trans-
planting: Nos, 4 '` 22, 26, 28, 32, 32,� 34, 35r and 49.
GROUP 3 -The trees in :1218 group are not as good as the others In
appearance or health, Or they have the large basal woody
( growth (burlvi that would limit the =rasibil3ty of transplant,
- :
3ng them, as Vidanced by the ,enclnsed two pictures of tree #38, �?
which has a basal burl of at ,twat 8 .feet. The trees in GioupC.)
are numbers 1, 2, 3, 9, 48, 27, 37, 38, 39, 40, 30, and 52.
Shculd there be any questions on this report, please give me a c423.
e ,
Sincerely, a
`Paul A. Rogers
Yembar Amexican Society of onsulting arborist
con #ulting Arborists
Land 1 Pla � I Design Group
C �F sea, �o C
Of ANNiNQ X"-Mu
TRANSMITTAL
The City a Ran .h , a nga
a�tl Rae ine Roams
_..$anch_�I��i2mcin�a o- �`81?S
L ,
ATTNr C7ndV MGYMs.
_ o I
fir Tract 13566 j
--- ,,--.- .— Job No. : , ETW 741
iii one Photo of tree #3
•
�r
o
�1A ' y
Mr. Steve xell'u
L404 Plan esi n r �
Ctti a`0 Newport Center brive
Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
boar Steve,
Ide: T-1"-13S66 olive Tree Trans ZaKts
In accordance IhIith Jour reque�st, T am submitting ` {'foe fs+Zicsm,-
ing data as i,6 the ,, oasibilit . Of *runs ',he sahe a the j
alive trees,,"'* the above site. ,
1
$i: -led upon saw report a `^
which we locat�ct in � Apr S, l�is � count 9
, #Z ive tr. et s
summary of this you easterly row on the,zrt`y,
group o trees shawl the Xotix,wingi--:%fiorusation:
t trees ors, gossibte Band£ dates for trarasptantire
'O'th 22 of these treys in better—, rza a g'
J
appearance or conditi" ca C+ i xn ai?�b
9 etter).
df #Y "esa, 22 trees there are l2zJas.
21, 22-* 24, 39 42, t#2: "$�; cxncF S2? Zl, 1�2, Z3� 14�
[ the fs of chaises for rranslstkrctsta i`Tko wc+uid be
10 tr` ~4sp cal �,au 5�* lfte a°smaini>tg
canal-- ,�, have tavereag& in appearance ax
gin, ar � grfe+th "Ift tar - basal burls 6,
card arge auaa -, try nks, is n consequent$, this
condition caould strEcxa:sZg tfee''praspeots o f
tranaptarttincf these,'
SAau::d you be desirous Of trarss
these 12 tre+ese l mould theta p�'atttihy mare. than
consider the x� s,ggot that you
than 4-era
,j`oi- wuring S trees which are siaa less
ge condition, but do 'It appear to osa, have.
and 49). transplant probltm
Zn order to aexlita# this transplant operatona ,waecld
recammetta that au
e2araider the falleauii>ng apractns.
pre-dig the hem i'acatan
prepare the selected f'ra4:s 'or transplanting by r
Out their dead wood and "rdxwingi exstitagcslia n`nc v
one - third. Also, pre,sacsFrnn �
prior to trans�+xnt would rtr�Ipthttse trees? „tac)€s
ENVii ME4 D CAPE CONSidt.7`AN'� : # - OJAI _
t! Steve X&I t 2 5:+ April I+,, 198's
J trans plant the 'triles immooiatetV tip thesir aawt
location:
✓ place . natarinq berms arourtd the base v,f runt
_the
ball area an, soak- isiaasdF titTs « Subsac�t ;�ertt aaccterRte�rs'
- sh4� ut4 fie on is wecklq bays -fj.
H` be sure thero is a4wquate dxair�a .t on 4,j ft tzees as
olive trees do hot Ti*4 a to7j, of nst at their;s
= base* �'Vou matj want to plant them on a�quadta becu��e
of,thi :'
«
Hopefully, this letter will 'satis,fy sour t**za qte T&etls
Please -, oall sae " if the ro are any � t :s'tions on 2aise` °
f "`�� ' Siztcarslyti<
haul A. Rogers
,> � �on�ttEirty .�rlior:afi
a
Member., American Socie:+y G�
y
Gon,sutting A�LSt3 c
P,AR; eb G
1;
4y
^a -
C/I
c U
U
Mr.. Steve Gard$ r
�"
gg
Land Elan De d;r91s Grout
'30 N. Center Dr., Suite 200
h�wport- 8eacii, Cep 92660 F
H1E #�2' 3fi 11C8�LypiG 1ss Trees c
Dear Steve: x i
c
r1S you requested, Z did iaq�c at a wadro' of trees of fire tIV£✓
ulesterlu side of tis s propexty a
ttiy fzndings Were .as� follows;
�
fete are approximately 250 trees it1 tha.s �tindrow w�.tn`'Clue tj= '
a «,c ed cum eu alypCtis most dominant. The ;trees arI. not part =
cs' ar' 1, tail and a °aeral,l a ppie, t0 rte These tz'ees ac;:aa�Iv
haxse han._:they ,axe as their fo].ic�q�� 3:s y�.itE T� i:t due, � tv r
-' -r.~ wind aaae$a. I7r
��
ii
"for to :rake t,"i],s w%ndYOW Sa'Qee -I, see A,
_ ;` 4ead treks (very few) egad tops a
need fcs tar reTeva`k
d thaw ..roes fret
s 'e as a�' regrowth : £zom st —.,Ps Lthe�e
at
ttter trees .exist
ost southerly, e d Of the windrow)
Pr.
_ h,= w 1� be n a
o :_ _
te 1ea
r�
_ .. ainformatxa:
re an u st tars a i
f
Paid ews
y:
U
f
ry s
5 1, T�i
ASSs i.►TESr "�. Acil a, 1987
IV
f
N.r. Steve Garcia
Land Plan Design Group
2110 N; 'Center Drive, suite 200
No�port Beach
CA 32660
T.T p,
}�
wl
Dear Steve:�rt'
F' 1
In accordance with o"rrngetnents,
X have just dompleted 'St suc3y of the tree
situation at the above Rancho Cucamoaiga etc. ,fly report, a map showin the tree
locations,
1
f.
and some tree Lorms are enclosed �s,{:djalow, g
A total Of 16 trees were evaivated 1#11 of Chess hav � e "been numbered
trunks,
o their
as indicated.on,the tree map. ThP,tre�4,S &eoiea q�tecl were S2
large olives (olea eurcpaea), 22 blue -gum
euca2yptua (Eucalyptus glzshu�h�� =,
and i Texas umbrella tree _'JAf,, iia Az.ederach ).
Overall, =y found these trees �o
be in less Than ay.arage condition, ' Tn paiticular,
many bf trta,r�iive :,trees had
some 'upper strurtueal iranch damage which;ap� ears to be the result of some
heavy recent.- -,dsids.
�'
1 hort. culturally inspected; all of. :these gees with ,:expect to selecting card -
I g
datES for preservatio °rt as gall. As`_those tries that "'be
a >Ld bes=t retpo
for health and szfary reasons.. The re- Its cE that iovesfajation.follpw.,
KOVALS - I am recommending that 9 of the 16 treesstrdl be retroued
health or
\'
for
safety reasons. The cause for removal,
detail of each tree ie ".shown in
-on the enclosed tree "
'it
xe:tjvei form.:`" A summary Of Giiil shed,:: that .3
trees are but regrowth £rom, �- stumps while 4 f4tea, are haxgrdoU_. �
kieca e a heavy
trunk damage or cavities. The remaining. 2 'Rees do nod haVe`anp
valxe�,as are
u% the=n is broken midway up 'its trunk while the Other 'free" has been 'uprooted,
and lays on the
-
ground. All of these trees have had 'X's pa nted'on' their.,
trunks atd are so identified on the tree
map, T' believe that; the cause faz -
these removaas is evident, but would be pleased to answer
any auestion�'o"
them Should they arise =:" rx_
C1P;:,'CnTts
'
Etizl r`e2E& 84n Vr,:J -. The remaining 67,,trees c' d be core idy,rt . 7
s a ai date s for rescruati3.tailis on all of these
'
trees are shoo
F alll, three r� "ims,,have ;� *ice 5;,
j
•� ? v l AM. 7
:sue _ `�� •�e rata . ^s �r vdlu'z .�;: '•'-�•`
tl \ nt.4.
`�
�
r
vt
Ino NV31�
1
t i
_
r_
—
SJ 53sw l / . mmall
O
3AOI
t '::qtr*
?v
•'
j t
I
� '�ev�i
,
,>..
♦
'�
4
..
'
jjjjt
� z
�cie�X
3S'm'IS H9d ..
�.;4ti'a
� t.k
1
�_
ii3mC1'� - 9At�9i'3k1
�
mtIft
O 34*.t
u
fi 3= *U
c
e
t
•
r
-to
5
r ,
C7 Q �
39tti'tilG '3b 4
O. 4J
i Aat111:0
r
N W
O8£ifBlPiAGi
°
LtJ: r
1
mss
��
C17
1
�n� _
Si_
•. �.
s �
'�t
!'iV
�
•.
321!1! ?N iitkt
Q
.•
�`.�.'..,
��y �►-
r
.�Yi�
::
��y`N
��, ��`
r
„����
N��
cam. �
@ @
CL
Lnn
LN ?i
.
F ' Z L.J
Li M
S U V .�
j..
_�
SS 33SN t J.if3M3
l
`r
i .3ZY"1�
= 1 -
`"
39M Ntt310
�� 5
,C ` -t.
+�..
n 4:
211
, v►i
!
civno 0j, a
6 4 M
ti
®Fq't
*
t4lil
y
tl
ma
W
CX3q
4 4 a 4 r
t 4
e
3rACNi!/ IP
e i
If
C
11 _
S* v CD
H,'jv3H
f ,`
r
39MhryCr �rarl,!
4 W F--
03ClAlC U
YC
G �.
�
�1PtsIYp
Li
"mac.
'�
;+
} "r AVD
~ ,
LU
r.
W*"S 10
CIO
�
r,•
�13CWCS9S
iaJ
t C
e#g3.�tC!
j;
hNCti i JfQc 3
cw3wjs
Ambism
fir
NI; if.,
CC
Ln
i
Zj
I .
{
,1
•a
i 4SL S333SUt 4V341 t
tt n a
r u 32V91 NY3.`i3
t j j
i f p UsA44Y 3ACKcA;i
Li :�orr�
� 10
o CV302AMIGH
Ov3O SAM ,. 8 e S Q S
CD 4a
� 3HQN t
-,
(� r U r }
t ` 3lanw o mils
All
et3a�oa��
n o
cc t�is u �II3sY35 r q f,.5 -+-
� G� �llpi�p9t4?
O L�1 uj
eor
O.
v is M" Now �
2¢# tI3CYti INO - -L•r
3X44 Haltlit3. {t3 Ile
a k
wt..t4J
a.
\ > \\
_ 01" stasHe zv� £1 j 1 3
t a
rAtn' 3AOWMI
JnA V-1
a r r r t
idol t a
p k CV30 U01am PA.
I t •
i! OW20 _1A011%i!1 � • C p C i � � i � R
i
i
SO 7a`33Y
v c)
r �
• � s�asu t, _
�" a�aasoaa ti
i4
Li
CiS uj 03SV3510 77 1
C> w LLI
a t d" C"Q
Li I HIH3 r
MCA "Ood
u twee 'g9a15.3K *
i
v
yr
Mme . C L"1 1 Ln
Z w �•
uj
x
r
f If
�^
Alf
9#vwl Ino MY31*
r
�xSfoal
a
i
S.RQ3SN 1 .tv3k l
-b
3H t N,
E
l's u
3$" l+11r'3'10
Uh
b3AO T 3AMOU
s -
'0
iSE
d!� oY3N
aNno m Q.L, nD1
M
s
o
r; +-
avzo mom
Q.
4- i
a
♦
f
♦
A,
i
k
I1
t
CY30 3A�1ia
,
!
•
•
1�
3NOa
�yv3o-�
3 e'']
}
i
3aviVYa 3ut#
\�
... u
51a3s#1
r
a
3�inWp
.
+Lt 1 AW*
UJ A_
g3sv3sla
r'
� fib n
Q11oaQ16fi'+
O LiJ
E
�
twos
A
�ilmd
It
AM .mats -3No
't7Y3 -ds
<
"'<
♦
r
CL
W Z
V
Va
�— u
J
tiL
l
In
Z � ,t iJ
"Li
l yn✓
kLi
A RESOLUTION OF -THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA P,RKING COMISSION'
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATI9" TRACT NO, 13566
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STRt EAST OF WAROM
SUttOCI, AI€)AD IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTJ^ -4
DWELL r, UNITS PER ACRE)
'i A. Recitals.
fi) Caryr(- --Nvelopment has, filed an application for the Design
Review of Tentative Tres.;t No. 13S&6 as described in the title of this .
Resolution. Hereinafter, JAet subject Design Revtkw request is referred to as 1
"the application" j
'
> (ii) ,On June 8, 68,8', v the Planning Commission of.,the City of Rancho
i, Cuca ;nga head a zoeting to' consider the application.
{iii} All legal pYerequisites to the adoption of this Resiplutionr
have occurred. r,� v
i
B. Resolution,,
it
NOW, THEREFORE, t-ft h reby found, determined and' resoly by the
Planning Commission Zaf$,�it'w th ity o Ran
c,�o Cu monga as follows.
1,' , �tiris hereby 5pLt ificall finds that_ali'of a fcs
set forth in the Recitaisr; Part A, of this Resalut n are true'and �c�rrect.
during the above - referenced�.�ea
. Based ,upon spbstantia3 evidence prey ted "':7 Commission `,'
ting on June 8, 1688, - -,� acting written and
oral staff reports, this CoaNr`ission hereby spectf�ca�ily finds as follows.
1: That the proposed project, is consistent with ,the
objectin of 1the,General Plan; and �J
2. Than the proposed desi i, is in accord with the
objective af. the DevP:loparent C;01 and Etiwanda
Specific Plan !and the purposes o6 the district in
which the S00131 tocate4,ri and'
3. That the propoi�eo design is in compliance, with each ]
of the appli+cab provisions of the Develo;aent Code
and Efiiwanda Sp',eoific Plan, and
4, -Th at thl', ro used design, together with the
conditions %splicable ,thereto, will not be ;
detrimenW twr the public health, 'safety,, or
welfare, or materially injurious to ,properties or
improvements iri ttt'nty. F
ll _ a
s
PLANNING CdwUssra RuownoH, No. 11
TT 13556 - Caryn Development
June 8, 1988
Page 2
L~
Based upon the f+4ndings and conclusions set forth in
paragraph 1? and 2 above, thy$ Commission hereby, approves the
�:+
i appL.�at. sub3ect to each and every condition set, forth below
�
and�� `� the attached Stan++a Conditions attached' hereto and .�.
ir1 or�porated, hereik bye this' reeference.
?�
Planning Division J=
1) i4rification 6f the high water• level (HWU of the Can
Sevaiczo spreading Basins adjacent to the0east property
boundary is required prior to recordation of the final
,
map. rn the event there is A major deviation from the
Previously ealsnlated high water level, the site sha?T be
redesigned to the satisfe.eL4on of Zity Planner and
_the
City Engineer,
JV
2) That r off -site easements required frna'County flood
Control shall be obtained prior to recorda tion. of 'the
r#a
fina p• f\
�4
3} The off -site slope ease'ent adJaceht to thp��'western
property line shall be planted for ei4sion Control and
that a temporary irrigation system shall ,be maintm ed__.�t
K fora period of at least 6 months by the develo �an'd consistent with the standard requirement for
plantfng for tustom, lot subdivisions. A landscape
irrigation plan shall be rewiewed and appro�Ad x ht
by
���
Cifij� Planner prior--t issuance of any permiU. t7
4) That 22 '+ f the exis'hini Olive trees are -i o °be
preserve:
and transplanted to tie western slope Of�,the flood
control Levy adjacent to the Community 'Trail. The
remaining 30 trees shall be rMoved, and replaced with IS-
gallon size replacement trees -4;t 4 o(ra- t0-1ne basis to he
i
,
planted ,ors the . we st side of the flood control levy. A
landscape and irrigation Tan illustrating tree
relocation
and replacement shall be reviewed and approved
by the t ty Planner and City Engineer prior to
rgcordatirns of the final mad. All Planting on the levee
is SubJec't.to approval-by the San Demardino, Countv'Plood
Control.4istric,c.
? 5) Tile, applicent shall submit: .tie removal permit to
address 19*'Oroposed remonal of my part of the off -site
windrow �'Uacent to the western property line, prior to
recordat'on of the final mag.
-(
61 The design of the -traot's entry rrt6nuientatio1v s'ia -be
.subiect to review, and approval by the Desi ,,r,Revtev
_ C�v Itta a and CfVy Inginta,, to issuance- building
,prior of
pemits.
to
7- o �.
r Tr 13so caryn 'pevelcPment M.�.
Page 3 {.
7)L That ''a permanent wail•° treatment shall , 't u iliaed -along
ll the western property line unless,a map ,has teen approved
on the ad3acen°t property , t tie time this project is to
be constructed, in whia` case a wood fence may be
c utilized, subject to the 'City., PlannWs approval, The
wood fencing shall' then receive a C's sistent paint or
stain tmatme?►t,
A-) A natural stonie shall be utiiize�'� for any fie tone
uener. However, other, hypes. of : stand ; Mantured
veneer, may be. cons1deM,1 subject ti, further tAgn
reVied, prior to issuance of building permits.
9) That' perimeter galls (ificluding walls-.
11 Ong, street "T)
and corner sideyard wales shall'ro, requ,ed avo 11✓_be
designed °r,� +h a.; decorative treat, '�nr Final. dejn of
the wall 'Weaticlit along S v'�Avenge 001 be subject
to review by the Desjgn fdView`',CeMittee prior' . to
uance of buil'ding�it5.
101 That 36Go` architectural detailing +shPi")1 be prvi`eed on
all side and rear,Alevations`wig an anhar,ced treattAent
provided lOr those'i� is whichlit4-g *on to Sunni Avenue
or the Csxa�unityt�1'
11) Driveways snaliaf neat exceed -4, Width ' of 16' "through the
public right- of, -w&y,.
12) Final. design of the equestrian trails Uenrfrlq,
-- ,airdxcaping, aradino "nil an equestrian trails dart l hilo
reviewed end-- aoprovesd by the Vty�hlanne� prior to
recordation. of the final map, The trail +"idth shall be a ,,
miaiodo of 12' free and` �lear,and slopes adga^ent to the
trail shall not exceed a s 1 ratio.-
143) Add tlonal -Nand doing, including ground covers shrubs
and addi ,.3na1 traes Shall be added to the west slop% of
the flood control libiv3D, Oxtails shall Le-provided, on
final landscape and irrigation peons and ail he subjett,
to review :by the Gity planner and City �ideer prior to
re: ordtian of the final map. - .All planting on the levee
Is subject to approval by the San Bernardino County Road
Control District, f
l'll Lots 90 and 91 shall be 'meet the_ minia�i width'
requfremen, of 8' as measured . at the required 'front',
setback.,
Afti
it
PLA�i�lINQ C 'Fa��tQiS ESO UTIou X.
IT 13566T�--- @tatyn Developiqent.. ;
Page 4
15) Fifty' percent Wof all .of., he hoaxes shall 'have , side -in
B Eight additional units shall be have"�side -on
stages,
garages for, a total of 42.
ii
7f` 6) The unit, on lot #46 shall be raver-4_in order to prevent
car Iighte from shining ,in " the'liv;ing;raco areas.
unity equestrian trafxsJ T con5truc�te and r
improvf 3 at the time of street constru ^t3o7,
18) Anal design of the grading and drainage for the western
1 propeety "Vne shall be ,resolved °prior to recordn ;of
the Final 3p. wo .
Yg) , X71 -condf'03nsj ' from the, previous tentative . tINIct 'Map.
�ap roval sham - Apply,,'
F�f
Engineering Division
y 1) "All;off - site easements and agrents for the maintenance
of t!he Ce+aewdM4 Trail 'shall W'-- stained from , the Sat:
i Bernardino. rnu ty. Flood` Control Dino ict prior ,io final
f _ mar approval.
2) Final design M.3, #,he, portals- locaied within thii public
right -of -wV shall be, subjeci to .approval of the Design
Review Cosmittee and the City Engineer.
3) Driveway locatloos shall be revised at Mows:
a; Lott shall access as close -to VW west property
line'7as passible.
T
b, Lot 57 shall access from Streeet "B'
4) A 12' aide, s' twat drsin easement to (.the Cit *t of R�gta ja i a
Cucamn§a shall be provided on lot 27. � t�
5) Communii,� Equestrian .rail . t:pra}r' eat Plzn's shat) be 1<
c. subjectsU the approval bf the Cil� Engineer.
4. The Deput", Secretary „ta this CoAeoi ,stun shad certify: 'to
the adoption of this Resolutiorb , 4
AP"r”" AND AbOPTC6 TH S STH DAY OF JUNE, 1M,
ISSION OTHE CI PLkNNIWG COW r Y Ri4tdCi$D CtiCANkfi A c=
AML
gyp _
r 1%
arry► T. M a rpsan r,
5 f ^ ✓� - — �.-- y
} I
v
O
p. fir' ��r�it
Q pp yy y
+ �
o+.�- ':-__.. _
r __'-_._"_'- '-.' � , , i;,; wY "Cb` • _ . {spy ° b }tea �`uN. 'n; �+ ,a� Y .+ r� ,s M Eli
U" 'S p Ti� C tVa
�... �� 'a,; �.�
N-2 .`f Ca r'a
O Lw M 6E I� iikk ,�pw
Y
• .i,';xC Na'�,r Y�q 'a« �. �t,p y$di pit �{
kit 09-11-30 Z" a
1 N�Or.�=.���'� TM y"f�� p�Q ff.�Y �!•� Ii�q�ai 'ffi ��Y �:O ��
V,,-, J Z EN i
tJ G P I �b iI
1
AAL
r.
tNU Y
a ta��.
ois
¢$ § °x
$
V.
5" p b N om. Mme+ a i' S A -.R
Al
VI
N
� . �s ,_ � -� � '- ; � a �� a �,•
c, �i � .fir L 'A ^"rtl y •. .q p,eNi
w
f �E ff
YS y1 �p 0•yY ' m
RIC, ■ yi s C Vt'
�• a ,e. U IC Q Yom— •'" Yr oil .....1
rOL q ii p-.N 1t• ML�Y �/►
J_44 uat 16 �G M�.i sR blpq G� C R'QYt� �y 4� M �M Q, Lw
:1 All
!J J=s
Im ix
7
`,[+6 AUY
g. VAT �a� ��K� Li��N+U��� �� � �� xi'�•� Lett
N i
°lot =mss 's r� (rS,
Ham.. sEll -I� �� Aa ISIT N <1
Zf
N
�i
Z1 4 '4a %is
p U� YWy 1043 '.. 5
13 11
4 fix �'trw�
or
zz
R- vto
it, 3 Nib
lin
a n wa ye p
C p
ph ': oS yY 7� V• N u 'm v 71 ,,. �4p QI N
i "s _° `- "Not
d g�w�a�„w 4p+v ,�� agr,.•u
/t� J _ Yg g �•«+i .Sr. ii.:!�. $ s+$,•'. ,,� :.fr�+`v«L. '«�'i *" N+-�
4��� +aHwvna+. �i.Ec.►yq.,'�a°Y"�"gj. wO�Qa�
NQ 'S.w'N Yf Y i tl" qq M' 4 y igipw,c
N 4N 'E y,+4 K IL
rti 4 �
4` C
a�%4. O C=
C NK,�t 000W4 4 MTri t
�y` L a• V V'yCYj� L\oG+'•'A A yC M
.
b tl !T {Y� V '
V LA Vb. Y'OI> s.
Yy Jll�w .VC �NY'6 '
*ate wt ^QO Y�iCµaiY YPw
N or{ �id� SL ie�N «wwNN °Se'u � uratl`e y w
�' ft
t,, "pp`� Yom` � ; S �^� }mq w�yy�[w®�,�• � 8'"����ys:
VpnLO 0, -1 I-c q° "R N 'L'• a� •� 'd..
CM dtT �fw NLO
;Sc w� . wed o l ft. Sapp a�ty�4.Yp�y }�9o�ao»� p,
' Ltd �; { qp�,7
�fpy.�Lw p. M 4 C�Jt p1y.. yLN CMy
NAY �4 pir d IC4 d6. .�CGGP..I.LP
u.
T3. .r`y' Egg �i L� ►0..4�G' `�s�`' M�R *ro�
4 C b C VO
N 6P tf
g e.oa.
e '
a
m
Y���SSSiii aN 'r4s s+s.'�sL 7�rLrw
^' P =g1. r � L
T- r em 976 q �+ b H �a °y 6
C^ N1eg7 +►S tly. YN 3 �. 1�
Tu � ►� 4� C N� 6 y � p O r p. ` a P
at ' : Ertl
8o p P O • 9�` Ing
y CQ N p RG
IT
j w1; a ..ice }a�. Asa ua4+ to " a�am b.
lz in a«, till sg
4> MM� .. . a,43 iii Qm ` a.2 V. 16 L�b ~Z ieb�4
t o, w e c,..
O L l�z ;C{(Ly. Ns µ4 .4 1.L., �C 0� uw N V r wwr M��1 _�
1'4 Obi• V �d xi fj i't4w.. w,
R W t r
aY VvNO �+y11 °� f. eCS tJr y. \fP G{K� u YV �_, ;12" i6 sit.+
y
+6CM9 yq. i. LGT N:VV MYat' ai0 ►�fwQ® 7C. ,Y •+. OI. C:7 Va
y�^" y■ v a's.+ u°►awyi $..h x� u.��os �'"� - ry"� ^t� a ®.�^°,n a
.+'rAW �L4�y ay 'yr® '`KOrt Pa py NlOi'wq�,t1.
{�3wp '�tgwui } 6CN Ma.N 4ti:.�,CCaVI+c7a C tN.l�: Wlp.ViMV
.p
CT'�G
�y a
CS
Y Lp .O I• C O.� 4 4
gy(
A'si..�.�
(f
gY -ppot $�M§ yR,� {= allom^ 'A' ZF
� m`pa�r
.YT E ypf Y
H � yL — ":Ai . �YQp
Yi f �i47YiiM N ilk ID OidN � N Y
}Y r r
ox '19
�j0y
yea l - ey
Y
4
X11. ahl; .tC'511 5113, Z. 9. N � � E� w ��iii''�
H]
Jr-
His�7. ,rtoi �� �K �
6 iA L yyy �p$p' c. y9� 4 b •�.4t
T1 Y'b. y k yy. f M M.'ry' • 0 '\ V 8.
i 2,=74 � 11 Z
_Z ,3� if aC}
Igo
I i fa
S
fig" �£s'.
rarr t Li, y6 iR L} ti$ pgig H L Is
' La ^�sy r4 y�aL CN NS da asJO
IT
.',t w a^. -~� .+ Vie. ° i° '�t','�� &.--
� '�' E
dl'�I+ali Np oc 4 pqc My.h H ^.`I
av Z.=. Y. � � 4��� aCp�Y 7� y hm w� ��tB #•ys C�• yp tb ~ I irT.
» ~ O
'".. � v," ,^
_ .h r » ~i1f-AA
-11py —NfW aC S �NtxyY J ' ..� x iM � t' ,;�� C� M .'�'�.'c 6^i wYM.Z L �6 { ���Ppa= ��!. .s�w. ' y � � � r M ^ ��66trI' ,.\^ ii �SM cc N S=a4A{: +V$�'� ' �y�Sa � ��.M 1qM. C. . � �4 ��C .w GCGC�I. r .n� a■ r.. y , O y yy o ,Y o N y �' ' '�� !� _ � � 4�G�6�y 'I r �tlL W Q O '' - � 4 �4i8t ' N �µ"{iLff
i VF
a
1
Win 1 ..
ia
I p `ES C
r,J LU. aas�
r •R�p -Ma a ca
.BYO rF A s
gam' 12 ,1 a
.m�sw . I }j I �y a�. .N .2
alpq ;ar ( K �. �y. - p� �
� a gq � o:�$ a is' •�� >� ig�° 3.ri e
CC pp yL p • up
N
4�
u'x
f y A \r C
^ ✓VC .O �t�s ISN �- �1 Cam. p
C� •.� J R� yQg�! @M:GY 1•:� 0.
L p�
�ys. '6Y. Y CLYMC
Na i bN'r_TyY y ^Y'U' y. �'Y
pr�[', ry1C �Ge y� �C
$iQ!N �� .. a��{ $� �g1�
Lsi
yyRa4:tr
�1 { i� �p9 >CW aN tlH..�{Yj �pppAl���§ ■) wmy V �Yi y}rJ
b ',gam Y t~ Hsi B
`yi. • NYy. ��
s is
at! Ci$ a'Y ®. Nye 4 N 'M 16Y y._p
'; -abi 8° CaI Y
r 4 O Y�w
.CI YG CM
� B qa' ^�' M Y .C.,C4 i• Y N e1� OpN w. N �y;�n p p�J t pY {>rV 9 � 4G 4.p pY'r
. �Gg q./Ty� ®l+.pLy, pba �. 2 :rq .. l0 ai1i A. y, qil `Y CtOa iyn
�y {f� �pF,..*b�ay�^ gLggy,.gCCq 6ay�NSNµ
{ ply - T! L LY OI Y ^ A V f 1. Y � cl ,�.�..'p q � M
}� tl1 C E i d u y yyyy 'C ,3r •qY iM L1► Yt`Jppa S y
N� W`Y dm VY.q Sr Aka= CIgY 4 7 ��VfA� pi�? LN�l =y
�•.,; �. del Ftpi R LLl C l -S
w u
x x
'ScL §l two r� YgPt°Ti y g a +� a ° °•` ell
ii
$&N- `gip 1 p� "i's z��QCs T ; � � w5 � „ ..I '
C.a IS YC.c �yYCY L Ce Y °�.. VN
qq�l■ cc°O
MOYPg 2
°nWY Og. L g
a$' $7 a AMq
1 " r
C ffiffi Mgt' Y oO. Ofw. fib. ° +qV OM c `SM
#
gY 1,86
�p�
I� 4!
f'C
qq 6 ii
ZIP!
C.
b. Vl LVh O +llr '�A,yr `i
LG5,8 N1 °
yy
ta- e s`GV
25Z 115
n }.
I.a{ab.°FL
O.. ! "
�Sd.8� �' •� �_�� ��"� aO�YC +fir' � \�
yYt�G. NY u1 YYY ^:. N°n J9 i46�t LAS icy. da�i
Y A. ■Gy �4\t C „VjY� .�Y: 'V � ��� C,y Rp to4{ Qr lkV:yv
it e
: "'� Baca yowaR- cow
c sR?$
C.
t
NN
ILI
LU
CL
r - r
L ., 1
IIY,� yy st
LIP z
:3 .oS
Y. OyY u w°si�'a
P. lyr
H
Elio ya Y
m
q M -. fi ~S Y �Y A y¢ �'i LET i 6 ML p p � i
�YY.�Y� YO ��. 4i� '`�iL] s. w. Q � �■ AM'y0 My p.p UF
y1..MLO yM ` q1�1 {L1 NO tg C MC ■N i
a t L Y413
O N A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNO-.Q, z
q DATE: June 8, 198E \
\ TO. Chairman and Members of the Plarnin; Ce issi ?
_.FROM, grad' Buller, City Planner
f BYE Cynthia S.`Q-sers Assistant ,Planner
1 _ SUBJECT "MINOk DEVEL13PMENT REVIE6t 87.51 -- MARRIOTT CORPORATIO�)- An
dPpa • o s .alai -t dec s on o en as moc ifica ono the
buii'din 9 elevations :,of an .existing r4stauran °t within t,5e
Neighborhood Commercial District located,.pp the northwest
corner of 1St Street and Ca. "r.+elian Street APY.. 2qi-
811_ -55
�1 I, ABSTRACT: An appeal of staff`s, decision tai deny a modification of
0 the -Ming elevations to cover the upper windows on the east,
i,
west and so;ath elevations of an existing restaurant located at 8578
19th` street.
f I,', BACKSROND: bi, March 9, 1988, the a plicaht filed s modification
ian
o n::I_�Mevetopmert R ,-view 87 -61 requesting modifications to the
builiting elevations. The applicant ",-uses to cover the upper
windows on the east, w st and south elewilons,yefth '1111 siding _or,
i x 4 ljoritdntal l? siding painted to match �ZQ building cnlor•
The pacpozed modifications were referred to the Design Rev;ew
E Car�aittee by the City Planner. On March 19, 1988 the Design Review
Coamcittee reviewed .::this application and rcc nded'the windows
remain uncovere& ='The Cespittee found the proposed coverings
.: inconsistent with ,Wt existing architecture.
III. ANALYSIS: Earlier this year a greenhouse addition was added to the,
Ies auran . 3s m art of the building addition, the ceiling was
lowered to 8 15". ljh upper`windows on the east west and touth
elevations are now opep., inside to the attic. The applicant is
therefore requesting that the windows be cov;red,
f'-
t On May 19, 1988,` the Desir n Review Committee rr�riewmd another
rin
i material fcr, ;cov g the upper windows. The appiicat:�t proposedo
that the wiriQ4^ws be covered with sto. 1-I., ainted to match the colora,:�
Of the existing building. the Comml-�,_ ;gain Maintained that the �
? proposed modiffca,Jon ways]; inconsis�eftt with the existing
architedt;re in fi At the ,change would create an incompatible
apPeal6t or imateri�ls on the elevations The Committee therefore
:. recomme id'ed that thd7 windows remain,, uncovered. �
L 1 STEM J
y �PLAWXI , C i� tON Stl4Pfi REPORT
Ma iott corporation < '
E� Page 2 - - - a -
{ f ttCnQr eV pmenty Rgviewr 87y �� +aa therefore denied based ugon, the
followin'g fiRd�ta _
11 The proposed ateri:tl ch lw,e would not amply wifil�Jfi a building
design quf6lines of a aevelopmant Code- (Se Lion
'57 10.060C.E.(c)),which specify r t4i colors and• materials
should ba . coordinated to ve, total . fatibility of
design. fief. should bleP r ll
with tK( .,surrouoinq'
3 envirormerot and not ,cause aoru y c$an es.
zY. RE "`J staF roiafids tt Planning Camr deny this ;
appeat o minor Desrelopmeat, Revie�r 81-61,throug?h ad< tion of the
attached Resolutior�, If how Over `� ne �Cop�sa�ssion detersi "tot 04t th
proposed modificatjons are acoeptable,, then staff should b
f �.••� prep a Resolution with findings for,ado ttion at you!
t ;
espec ll sutrs'ttedS
*
Brad B4 � ep
City. l anti? rf >;
a BB'CRsvc
Attachments} Exhibit "A. - letter of Denial 1
'Exhibit "B" - Letter of Appeal
Exhibit 004'. Ong Etevatio} _
Resolution of Denial
oe�. ', 1
� n
i) • tidy / �)))� , � : �;' tt J C "+
1
•« 5 f
r a
tea,
tY
city of RANCHfo cuci oNoA Port offte Box Rol. Rsndre Cuomo Cstltaaia 901
April 6, 1988
Ne$ Litz"' er
Marriott Corporation
1111 Town and Country Road, Suite
Orange, CA p, " ;
SUBJECT;. MWIFICATIOW OF NIOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -61
Do 11
Dear Mir. Litzinger;
The Planning Division has revifted your request to modifiy Minor
Development Review 67 -61 to include covering the stained 13i3s windows,
at the gable ends and entry with painted harizonal lap siding.
The Planning Division hereby denier yours request for the' reasons �.
discussed herein. in order to approve the y w-'- exatOpment Review
request, certain findings in the affirmative must be substantiated by
facts to support those findings. The findings include the following.
Fi nps
1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the objectives of
ii the Development Code, the purpose of the district in which the
sits is located.
2. That the proposed use, together with renditions applicable
thereto, will not be detrimental to the paiblic health, safety,,
or welfare, or materitily injurous to pnpei tiez or improvements
in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use wii't comply with the apolicabla provisions `
of the Development Code.
4. That the proposed use is cpnsi tent "With the objectives of the
General plan,
On March 17, 1988 the Design Review Committee reviewed the above '
described project. The Committee f Jnd the prapOSed painted wood .sliding
Inconsistent with the building. elevations. ,.It was tl , Committee`3
Agcrh recoNT— ndation that the stained grass windows min ors ioh� � he w indawrs
to he replaced with spandrel glass S`af.,f, thet4fore, determip_d
that , --facts to Support finding 3 Ctfiiiot ba made in the;,posttive fors
the falTtwing reason.
` { T
o aa,a' [kDar N &pun ,Itffrey Kin; Ch V.M N
Ir" Dennis L Suwt ChArk�d
(itiQrtf.l Pu 11I' —U4 �....�_,.
r a
.April= 6�1
. " "I MDR 87 -b:
L�t-� --
V P,xge { ^�
L. Than' proposed material change would not ceeply wit ,the<�w
design
guideiins of the 0ewalo
pnt.S $ction p.10. 02C
specifiits:.
that color$a anti Matt4rials s-hauld k rood tt�t+tgd
to achieve total � co"at�bili q �rrsn.
well kith #ha � surround #rsie t►nriortMen nd not cause dhrupt ,
r chan9ts.
1„l pF
This decision will �e o* fi t �tltless ne at .;iS 31ed r�fihtn tan
flq ' calendar +;oys f tha Akt�;?,Of'tha. lattter. The 9�peitl 1:atSt be
filed with the IAignirr `Ctmdjsion secrattarr irt`�ri i
462.--appeal fee; ita you s#tould ravtt a furC� rte';. R
rU+
has3tai sioc 1rse dog,;
f � contact Cynthia kjns #r of thfj or" f, ca a� {7i4� Omit
pIYI �>
GI
ti..
BB`CKojs Q r�
^ v
r o O,
w, c
a CO#�tisik?�1Ci, �, t I �t tt�
AM
Z'Q t�i1'?gWfl.1lFY'iA`s'fi7troyROAd
:'a OMACC OFOCE
RE f Ctitlty4 Crtlif�Ya� yznte6 .�° � � ; c
Apps 14 9g
4 �;t
G � ii .�
CommUv.lity DVW!4rmetst fit. ' arttnent r�
ion
y >Ci r sxf 4 ticitii; '1.amc
i 432 Bageline
"S2a3T^cho CUCs31SICy3t ray `31£1i :��f & 1 1 �'/ �-
k `STENTr4 e` Ci Brad = Buljer
REF 7"I'Mu Bob! Big��oy ',�`�S�J '� � �`• �
CarueZ ,an M nue .Ra#ic�kt� :uc ittoriy�
to f ice V'bn of Ni. rn Deg vdo
�r
a �
v J .cl x
De 4i mr. e vall
In rasponse!,,,; .Your, fetter `of APr-1 .';61 I P f�zt. Mt'.
enclosed please find a chs(jX ;n ;fir ;� t amrturtt, 6
-- of ttne appeal xe� ' � a = �.
We ash tai' submit aFxothpr finish 'material
y ; altexnat ve thsat may be mutlktoL 1 sa4isffw�i
5incere'y,
� f���/p/^`/ � pew � ♦,` L `
HaPA' Se
cc* 2ck Powors
i»Bir o
o rvt
o
Ek
ART Y cT'ttCfl ►tY4:!}r;tt41a�`CS& 'jltFt! @7�AfSPAt��.». ,;,
<-) 31.wI.� li � • �, u . , pry".
!r .� k•. `fir ` i
P
r;
yr ,-
Yi'
UK
{5ippCCtTt," +
�0 1
J Am 71
r ;'-RcSt3itUTi6hS ir0' t S
' A RE SOW_T.ION OF THE RP4CH0 CJ%AMONOA" PLANNING :.Ot IISo ON
DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVI£N NQ: 87 -61 LOCAT�J1 AT �
THE NORTHEAST LOANER' OF 13TH STREET AND CA NELTA.Ll rf71EET;
�\
M, THE NEIGHBORHOOD COWEP ^1AL DISTRICT
Sfi
A. Recitals. ?.
an applica�i
�1e
Marriott 'Corporot, on has f�t o.� f��r the appr�al
of Minor Development Review 87 -01 as dcecribed in -th '�
Resolution..,,,) Hereinafter in thf� - esclutio the suh3eci;; -De el�atlent Rcviea
request is . >.ref�nre7 to as `the application ". "-
t On the`>`i,.f $tt't of dune, 298.5, the P7� nnihs Caaxrissidn ,�►f. �e
City of Rv:ncho Cucamnq�) conducted a rgeeting on the application and r:pncIt
slid meeting on that dam). _
All ��gal prerequisites to the addipt:ion of hi Resoict;ork
have ocrurrew.
i
B. Resrletion.
W)0 THEREFORE, it is hereby. - fotia'd, determined rend resolved k the
Planning Cowiasior of the City ,of Rancho Cvm sonsa s,.fallat�s
1:' - This Coamission hereby specii:ically ffncstiat all of tfie facts
set forth in the Recitals, .Bart A, of this Resolution, are t'r?tte and correct.
' 2, Based upon( svhn� t=ial eVidence'prasented to flits ,v ; is ion
dur ing the .above - referenced mee;Tj3g nn dung D, 1988$, includir rar it�en ".and
_
oral staff reports, this ii;"i.ssion 7�erebX specifically finds as f0 lows:
l
(a) The applicItIon applies, t6 property Tocatad' a 8.687 th
Street is presently improved Wfth a restaurant and,
Cbl Tiyr` p{ --rty to the north of tie subject sits is
Neighborhood Comnercial .Cehtdr -,i the praporty to the south "6f that,' s �ir
consists of Neigb orh000 Comertial Center, the prope�^ty„ to the easit i
R siGent a d Cor�_rcial, Center, and the property `to the west is Sid I Flat
- ;
ic) ihe..proposed materiaT change -,would not, (7,)uply riit#s tEe,
building guidelines of the Devel:opsnant Chile (SCtion
which spctifies that colors b,ld' materials shcuid be codrdlnated''to aChi eve
total Cosytatibi }ity af; design. °iTW shot —J blend wa11; pith the �urrtunding
environment acid not causc)abruft,.changes. ,
3.' < Based up tiie si stantiaT e�,Jden6e pretjlited :to J�h #s C0"Ission
deri tbi ,move- referenced meeting and upbA ;the specifid iitadin of ;acts
sap* or�:h fit paragraph '3 and ':above, this;rCow ssibn'hareby finds. and
vieS a$ follows;
o ��Y
PLANNING d�*ISSION RESOLUflON ''No. �
44ZtR,57 - Marriott
-61 Corporation
Ju'ttz B, 1988
,
�-
(4) ihdt ,the raposed '6
ff p^ pro�ecV' n6 43nsistent ylth the
3e�tives f�f the General Pian, ono \„
(b3''That the propcsed use 'is not ri aelord with the
obJPCtiue of. the Deve709ment Code and the eurpOses of
Y
�+ the distiict -in which the site is located -,, and '
(c) -'Tha* the proposed use is not in cpmf�� #ancpa avith each-
' G u�e applicable prgviiiorts of the Develop Coae;
and ).ent
(d) . That tY,e proposed use, tooethetctiith the conditions
!'applicable 'th6vtq,)'�ill be detrintdntai to she p✓hlic, _
health, tasety, ar welfare, 'or materially injurious
to '
peoperties,or improvements in -the vicinity.
4. This�Comnission hereby finds aid-'certifies that the project has
been reviewed and con 'tidered in compliance with Ca'
t`pe *"�rtia Envirpnmantal
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, ty,ts Cormrissiat r hgF`eby isAues a 3 eiegrY�ive
Declaration,
=S. Based upon, tl,e fipdings ;and, conclusions.• set) forth iit mnioriagh
I, 2 and`3.above, thia Ccw tstly;A hereby dciles` be
application,
6. roe, Peputy, Secretary to 'ibis,. Conmmission shall fertify `�a' .the
adoptl`on of this Re�rrlution.
APPROVED A .
<:, ADOPTED THIS �T ## DAY OF 3U� €, 3988
PLANNING COt !))S' ," 1i of THE ti i t OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
tit -
Bye
Urr�y ier;
�I ATnS7v
a u . erg ep _ re
1, Braio ' 3u`iler, Ie ut y Sc retary of the Pl annijg COWissi oi of---the Ctty} of, Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the il6re6oin4 Resdldtiart /was
i
��
duly and
regularly introduted, /;tasiedi and adopted by the �Plan�qing Coal ;,ss ;oii of the
ry„ City Of Rancho Cucamonga;; at a regtller Meeting Of the Planting
>
COMM S ion .held
an the 8th day of June, 13$8, by-the follovtng Rote -to -pit:
}
AYES: ti41A#ISSIONERS:
a
�r.�yy�k� G�y��y �+p
,r -Ci�'ih#ISSIInUM.
`ABSENT C0�#IS:�a'k1NE11$: J
yr
0 � n ,f
�
F'
uITY. c, �a cz o t
DATE: June a, 19e8 �
d.
ifl Chairman and,,Membera o, the Plaoning Commission
FROM: Barrye R L Hanson, Sen� or Civil Engineer
Suaj? T: AN AMENOk NT TO TQE VESTING TENTATIVE' MAP SECTION OF -THE
CITY- SUq(3IVISIQV OR INA�'CE TO INCLUDE ,THE REGUtATIOPi OF
NON- RESI'DENTIT SUOD I TONS
BACKGROUND-
The- City adopted its vesting tedfat ve map ordfldnce, (No. 280 Copy `
�ttachedt for residential., subdivisions on November -2C, ig88,. `to he in fe
effect by January .1,' W6„, as re. irdd by" $t a4 lase, State "Iaw now �
requires that Developers' be'aliond t;a`vfile` a vesting.�tentatfive map for
non- residential subdivisions, Therefore; staff has-prepare& the attached
ordinance which will .amend existing ordinance.; to govern the 11
processing of non- residentiai'in additiois tp Nrk1denflml subdivisips. `-
DISCUSSION; .
Bri.efly,� a westing tentati'Ve map`gives a subdiv1rner, the right to'oevelop
a subdivision in' accordance with the`'City TegOitldne in effect at the
time that.the vesting tentative' =map was approval!_ arid, no,inew or;thanged; i
' re °!rents can imposed by he City during tlfe approval perfod, „ In
addition, that same ;right exten 0 for ot;e year after recordation of the
final map.
As stated, this ordinance modlfiretio �� rel changes tIEOSr; .sections of
the previous ordinance that refer'ra,;, 0 residential_subdiviiiotis only to
include non- residential,uidiviSion;r, l
The existing ordinance °essentially restated the ;rte- quires! State law; J
Where the City was given options,, the most restrictive option wad' 1
f chosen. A listing of thole options'-teferenced ,,,by 'ordin nee section
number is as follows r
_ 16,49.060 (b) All discreiionAry it�ns shall be`i' 704 tip the «
vesting tentative reap versus at alaterdate asallld,by the State
law. 1
16.49.080 The vesting tentat0a, map inftitl approval shai.l'expiz ..,
,�. in two years, versusthe'"tft'rk�%.ayc ,"r opt�otf all �i by Mate daw
A.
t, s
� iN+�
� i3Pt .5 D�Z!MyCE �Oy? TRZ CITY colmCI ; Q{�" 'ni'n� ,
.c" MCJi' ollax F+ -q�, - SzC— z-zXON 7- lFt
CUCAXbMGk MVffZMPAL C , Ptkj( .L'4IXG To TIC; a '
`PRO SSING, d� #F�S'i'xAi#r !��NTATIyt
r 'caj it k �'M-
fii CITY $QU I , :F H CZxY c QB" Ci?
S�RLtl I2�" AS , XIOLL-Otid '' )
3 = SgGtiAtri�.4S.63L'��t) of the k a_ftho
Cucamonga Murt icipal Cade za ;herelb3r atmettdeci ,tn �* riy in t�ts�rd znd
figures, ,as fo�ovys: fir,
ilerteve '"R p e ovi�i o Of the ,scba; v on H
r. Irp .tact, as E#$t C#hd sup? s�tsriLed tfl► the
, Subd 'trisio:6 rdaQ4napp, �4a . of a fiiAA o7f a �r
k tentat3Lva map ,ar, te4- kktiva pmrce tap, U vest'lu 1>
tdotat�ve °fs�s �a�r =Pig" b fit in 'aeco i +z ce witia
15. 43,044 {a� of- the ��axncho /
C.upatonga Municioab rode" ,is , ereisy, t test ed u, ready in
figures s ati ft?3 } ota5
aii� .A tv�3��`SYitfil'.EE$.?Vti� RlXtf iihd T�lAtB�Ak
I ktftntti9G$. Ytl r
P
or a arai dar�t� �s�" -- * ?an- rasid�ritial
�u ivia on, sz d+aian rx a eu m- ssn ordiatn�e. f
arisl which is. thereafter VrQcdesed °in a
ordance vith` the. w i
WL+L.R. obaptaw'� JiF,
certify tO the a '
adep zAtt of th.;s Ordinance and tshall .Caus tine "Zo to
�VUblished wit �,'fifteen z15� days, after i�i�� 4 adoption a a:eas�
once s n 3t rt a nevapd1pe. of eh��at o' rCd I
pu�,lzsh ®d ,i�'teie City, o €,Ontarlo; and. c rcula est in they t f f l LJ
;;Rancho Con
Q
~ 988. PASSED ANa A' OMD Minis of
i yy
� =t1.._ � [•x�l`. �. a ['�3, .����� Gs+l1��P'�l V.��r f� 4�' jjl �
c a
ai
4.
Y
x
or�inxnce -stn, `
-I 8�`�MRLY A. 1�UTH9 +� F l� city C+Ir $ `'t7$ F city-
Rancho Cucagongar Rio hereby ceirtify that the fnroggin Or
a�tt
x�nhce
was intro at a regular mesti;tkgr:x�g the C ter C�su�a� i, tams=
=
or
City of Rancho Cucamonga heid on the day Qf `-
1988, and zias 91nall r
' paai�etl 3t . re�1a YdeSt�in�j n t2 City
4t
Council a the, ty a�f�: RaTi s 7aQ3� qa �e;d an- t
CU *a xta ^� ref
• .
_ .�
— 19$8,r by t1 s air n vita.
AYES: 1't
MUNCILUDOmp
i
dBS2;
*Rpm a ' rl
y NNdT AH�� :
♦ a .
t37NCIL ERS.
ay
ABS
IM.D tir aC i ERS�
1
'6.1iO tidy
°. ^d 4 ;4
Utah Cucaxanga
-
.
i
1 , a
-
-
t -.
i il.
Jj
ry
4
r
TOM P
AN ORD ANCF or %h Cxm Co cllI or T*L C2Tr Of Rmulld
ttTCn, y A� CALIF919�filie
APOW CHAP%IR 16.49 ` TO TR9
e. ,;� SU iPlSIOld Oi19I3iR7fC . tITLS 6 Or TsR . Cog cAXMA �
wNcIPA6 'COM Pilho l4C TO -#A
To$ CITj caOwc)L OP Tam iarg OP jApCgO Ct?CAl�oNGA ✓OOiS6 9RIlAAC AS
FOLtCSiS: �
au-
Ti Y4 o£ the Sasaho Cutsion;a Malt' :pal Code 44-_q da Cl i is- harebf
as +64. to hat tad,,, in vbrd* add fitutes: as Yolloutz
t
�.^krers�lLC +i9
r t�
1� �G ct ibfd:�ceYdsakfy v� ;„
# *+O Tarps* -404 #+at . n`
9 . bpplitsi�nm ciE1� @Zllra "
16.ia9: � Dsiia #bidaa. <,
14. 49.030 Cousiom, aitb;s #ty rsdabreiQas.
ld, 9.060 T.iiej aad- noaa:aisp.•
16.4t. Aftsi
�.�.ti 16.A�7.UE0 `'.3eP4Cai3�p54m. .>
!Q. &9 090 Pttbte forted on dAPtdssi of aoog.
16441-100 lac}raa�attisAr Vwl Soti,ftc;- Coa�EsUbeal appTOW4.
10.49, id` +Rlssgtisas isssesistYet Vitk.Car; sat polio #es.,
o '2 a
to be agChorY r • 5�• Tbi* ChOptar it,GM ttad pdrsu�tlt~
c tg txaatid b7 ,ckoti ' >a t .�dtneisi�g3sQ with baocion 6649sa) oil
cta AuIl+taraih Cere[rn r CO�v i6a+rs i tAr Trat4tiTe ,MaP xt.!Ato. ,Al al A* cite r. a$ s:fwwt Aa to at esnbtasr.ivPee oL£bt i
04 patPose of" tb#o ebsptO ca
eserbt> D Rr4nree oxaas�aag # the aaeab�asctdC ai th7szoTsaasti�a
ltAp atatuea. Ytaevt the T tbi0" cbsPtar, A4 nthutina s+vt torn *a
for provisiaaa ,of tbim A- mbdlrisiea ;;;ird #aesde s shall applg _ d Tthe ; reatia
; .: � eaeeec #v4 aap.eredi�asnesn
I` It pal• -r.�_, iseilea "cb� �e��lSt; ` _ j� `,
s Tb1eM - ChAfter shalt .apply- csYT<, to *.*dish l dbCelcbpi�nCrt„
tibec9ssr a vicririos of the pd' d4itist„ iLp 4s�r as implsiantsd �
by ties a+vwxisibar tiayl3soseaE rstuirils the #;,lies of a to *ts £was"=
t4rF ss 'tert�tivrs pars,AX ORp #ar, A , Ottidsetia Ooolo"Mac► v .arss #i.e rr ptativre
i
p ,bgm,essi be ii in oclordsws w4tb the a��ir€aaa, siat.
.,
If
s sob,! #bi[der daps not sli thtt ci ;b,�'a coaf tt-r by this
C3QpteQt ,tbeOtbarar38Y aRV$iCabe PrOR'$s$,ORB Qi�' thM' Dfi� ,'Fa+F{oitA'tS�iRi�tAt * "1{hall
yPplg�:
t }� r. 'pie) 'vtasai crts�itis _IQs eslse'�i "
ta$idpsciirl svuadir #clan, IsQ of 4406(�fi )lb�..e�►�_V$ss �sdia�a�s� avail
t �bralr�a
V tidasr t *€ pra.+�ei ia•extatd rriab tflr
`� X5!5 " �}sa+ri�i`bas+i a�• whir tbaptar,
#rsepk e& SwAfqc&,A a i4tbu rtsbqz« s tpier in the a adiv ;ae & f aFa
I �t r,
sa �6 •ti�: C �,�a .. y, ,..�h+'l�i " %lF �'� Oi.I..%F M +.'"'"
�Ordinance Na. 2SO
File 2 i i-Pr •
l _ 6inw h
itibdivided cad dstrala
'^ S ;e��, lta Laa@ she ba
developed Put usnt Sa a,vaatidg tt tstiva asp for 407 plat t
S ahsah V"l4ucaasiateat . Vito the So r.,411 Pia4 az aay 3Pplieabla c.Psc :c plea nr
c*saani Plan " and vbiey f,a at petaittad by ebe davelapesnt�de as otbsr
aAAiicabla pzavzafoaa of :this calla.
A xsatids tsotarle cap.,sbaYl be
filed is tba eaMea fare 'asd ipave ^$a saaw cpnttats, act* i
report• .? sad shall be �`9t dlta mild
Pxotessad q _ the sawn :- iasoar ea set lattb is the
aubdivissbs ordinrn*e for a trt:tcsXXe <;at3V -tOPr .aa 4erain Star fravido
the.tiep a vesti!j 6eotstivR sad is fit ad it shall ''bava
Printed ccnrpi.u¢asly of #ss fats tho words wasting tentative sap.,
"(b) 33asitasyssc �iL4t. or prier for tCe tio; s Sdasbira, °tentativ6` eta 1'
it filed, -a subi?�xi€�ar -)s6sll as¢ply y` cmpleCalf. =px *ieaLiesa far; P
•eutio%4 'cause cntitSssatats aadessaey._for Me Preje i 3asibdisd. bxt not
U' :r Plea ox- • $era#ta, r, elavralapt gtldasigs Xsvitah, ao atq tc. the $*Data!'
a7 rPPYicable apaoiFie„ plan z�z "tc�ramity ,pisp a Changes,
ensadsatett3" to shy d, ratapnsrr �Cod*.� etC., tp�ot&ar
£i�farsatiat nr3grax7f xa � - 1 � aaooYeea
taceps„ as awl %til: t a beaa tre declaration or
droll , envixoseYescat 36v"zv . report purpu:�E CQ the Eexsa� of tie �als!*ssia
taviro M tsl Quality Act. ,
"Ct� ' k TP4 rid�r may ION** a cesplate aPplioqttioa for
a ba£Zdinf
pa`zait ae� he time ii3ioy� s gzyri+l+M4 ilk, this; rattle# ry►arairar�. yeller an
c,
aircueataaxsa_ehall aucb pervit, if #asued'. ,rate vaar #tyl ri�hsa - ar`;r10dar an
Apos �iI al vesting
z:+ subdi�id ^ ^ar 1l " tastctive a rP.. the
PaY h14 laid z u# eat tblE rfeoution of 'the city 04nocil
j
..fcr the fiki the proc :slap of ::= tentative i�p � -
^iss4.c veer y e` approval or comaitiotal a
vesting'testotivq !pap shall sap#taAv' Q (9) $ream from the! date of £ a adoption
by rtaplutitc lc +lasicuo of a -143W4 zoetativa asp s +ill ba anbjaet to Ebasa
Atotobaraa as tk* saf�dix -lam ctd ;rt,�,-�gq ' aPPlitablp , to the anttssion of 11 tentative crape
y '4
r h.
.. �~�n' �B�x1Pw swyww_ 3 e^�yti i'�v �t ==• ..
r
"(a) 2°Ma pPrcvai ax coodit#aasl tppxorat of a viespiq tsstttiva step
_ shall spatez a vd�;s9 right to pt'!xtew a#cmal ssl Csd
^" is aubpE�sar #aL t p p7oce" vit@ dnsimpewat;
aarpliaroa v ;tE the ordiraauad * r gl#&latb. , art9 .04r.Aa&d !j
+ieseriba+i im QaRytEa�iee faAe section
" + ..iE tsot:ios 6dAi�4: of the Covots"d %; ode is sapaslod the,
apCrcare% art towtlnsal approval . a! a VC- gIRS -tentative trap that' saefar A
+astsd r4it to pt;oaess a flat! ae@
roortiaorwoe -rid the isad ase ,rdiij aevs. 3 'tlt5t ri el�►p�yast iq a atantial'
the rive the vastiq ��stallve" �ta a Po er. aad "atsaisrds In aflett at
pprwai or eoaditiomilly approved.
'Pti� 3istvithaLatadi
`aatitlow"t we't ba Ajda�� ego "3tsars `ooir�daaiad$i E� ap hE aaseassioa.
�' detera#aads mil of tko tollatiK� at
"(tl 6
subdivisiou or. the i p L a' to o ap sjomtd }lace ihe, .,7gsir�aA,Eh a! . e"
5 their beslth at jUt%fy el aitp. qi bath. is a raaditiea deugaraua
"(z) s -COM41ties or.drmiA is rettrfi�
state or iadatal is order to
is;r.p
y
;l » `` Aedxnacta t a
U 3
ira
1
The T10ti re:svredE to fn iiiL
's section shall' cet>•ue only` st, Anti
at the tit*. a #£tx1 imp isaPprarsd hq Project. Soc3'tiIIhts referred to <
�i, S aapire sf as l rtal pis ot• approved &v£or,ta the ri,iciraq of'`
tine veoCirtr`'ckatatitea r►t ^+ Rj +rgvira 3 �3set£oa 26.4%0 §0,=',-
"t d? tf the f3ai1 Jiasp is �� psoya�t, ehrse ri hi MdMLI resurfa vested
fee the scilcoaii!a' Ffrr�ode a taster
r
An -itial 1ak£ae� Parsed of t�alwa _�Iai Wcrbe< where
s4zy1 r$. al, asp aT_t+saxtiisd ,�yn variav3i Phases q# kr> eject aoy!Qrad by a
a£ I 4s;ia 'ten aszva Sep. th34.. nitial tiaw Parted shall begin fee r-at
fiaa'i•,mP For -tbnt p4goe 1s 15ia aLe �j,
\ ✓. *CY ? The initial tLmt) pirie+ic}atte #oreh is ddl C2 ylaAt 6�
auxaeari.4ll . arrG�cd by aaf tiva sad for processing a comilata app igll ba >
#er -af Sr i pacait its got tae pn ov ar4biteetural raviar.- if $454� ctdsein$
asaaadr 30 ddTa# froaCvI)w data late ipplieatiox is #ilia
"CSI k urxbdigidtlr appl} to the $i Caacw t1 f /fc aaa -pear
sets mg it fit A y tip hafara eira jimitisl �iw AVIV not fovth( in (d) Elv
atPfros< (( =
Oft Oubdivi4or, ��rettioaapa p l.ie�eF e rio(10 for ) & bnildx of pa,44 durlrgz�,,tbe pariada a# ti6 s oes, ,
at rights- r read 'ta bomr-in nisi ee-eYt etatfll t6gyN.�iraeipa of
tear Paruit. o> aa�c1se of tta4t §exit
Ca ?; whersasrr a aubd�'itar file* a vsua4 ,�ltanq�atiwa map far a
I ` subdivision as iate"2t dew *at- In ixaaaaistie4t ` eii, the detralcpsegnt
( each ia, *4tacoa at that tPow that metatir..eebai 0,111 VVImotad aa"the .cap.
l3a pity sb 1I11 a14lj 4401k 0 vostiat toAtstive amwtai
approve 4-62 iiioaad an
the ®u6d e£dase ,1 as sir beer dasipe i.- lAkO i the r}Oars�etp p�ha is is the
devr�iopeaR�;na�e td ,e1 «:}64try the iac. ieta>r� Ff theiah�a is the
davelopaaat ndd4= is "ebtait d - the epPTW- at Or eoaditisa�sal$ v'hBPrcrcrd cresting
tantativa map shall o'ntaitbstatNi,og
V15 ,; to 'Process ,t #feel, sap grad PS kr; , he dasalopsdb �� anbat edtial
ces giawa vita t3Ga cla"k With Us cLamvx, i:t 6ba sleselopsaat 5.oda and eha >tiop.
erase«
f/ "Cb3' She rISbta ansdoraad bY' ebia seattea shaR.rl bt fee klbe tits
ptr�ods eat forth is beot3F� li.Z! <0l1Cd� l ? �
tn'11 "td.i %.di3�+�GaffiP_a - fazs�;�,e ""S nr� a
e$ataer[ n9 any provisrion # tbig cbApta-t. 4, 1! *WtY avant of his ar tear
ci�aibaag sad saw ppgrotaet.. ? >a
for davala� rat vhicb tjpast� fro* 'the
or�in4aFSa a 24iloit4 and ito tar#a iaaaribaN i '�Psttsoas > 16.+19. 30Cn) 4ndu`
49.100 Z ioc* �'Wi - �btamt tba:•g oPprovxla or iaaua ai9sae pstaita
,a the as 4ae. t8at stirs d�psitn•ah; reauti�os€iiad under aptlita►bla lev.
91EC�°tCla 2� xb`y pYSOriaset€f►' �q MaalYor A$ of SitU 16 shall bscort� lllVlll
oparatir ®w of. lan to 1. lf4. G
l4Qclw On. soft a
aaetian, the
(!it- C ktavissaa. ;,
P.rsgr4.yta ar ward, a# e�iA �i344da #a taodar4nt err declared
+ra3ia br" 4ay :iaay radars elate t 7 it <ae aa�tr`a sa# a
C. mask" of ems, �r`:av-ptewa lesi,ai4ems the to"-" r+'PrC Jurisdiction, coo or blr
par ra tea. sacasc6rr, awl.wearda a# this t7row, i y: a Dana..
r-
aadAaifist. +srglirr�vy1,.A r3� 3a Eel ferrca
ri
taa4itarp" 163. 240
The Q16T, shall situ tbin Qxdiaaatr sad eba Ci4y Ciaxk
%� ahsxl cauaa the- $laaa to be pubtisbiA xikbio fifteU 1151 days afkl�ite .pi�atar '
r at Is A
Omit 44 Us t lX Sraer
r +€ aeropaptr of toner al eizt'R %ub iobatd
is thPity of tatio. f a p
alifotaia. a e! oirculaeat',_ sa ebJ'! t, �'leaebo °
o. cuca"oss. Califorai t,
ry ,
�' lA83Rtk, A1'thGNsJI. 404 ADO"Im tbia kbth'�K:4 oa! movesbor;
OW ' _
W Nritbt. 94uaiet Kikolow 31ebl. tia=
y
ttClfs Note
Magic
f .,
26ikel rl. or
ATTUT-
Owrody'x twteelret, C t , C gilt
��
T, StrMT L It TK" cxn of thl• Cate± au #4 Gaaaueioafa,
Caiifoataiak do hera9y Catstify that t foresaiod iatsata t ea las';cdarai at a
ragular swear; of the Co4aail of the ity of use C, cif AMSasa'baW 'td oa tbik.6tib
dal of Woaasher, "1965, s;ad was fiaall a
f P3af� � at'e ra6aiex resa:irrR of the City
C4w4ail of the City of 14600 44ana4a aald as tk< _20;b day of jaeaubt2r. it$$
Caetiforar;JkOcuted WsO 23ae day, GL' 174raaber. 1933 at Rauh* !440aeaoalsit,
p i u
I y
awW Y A. "
tR0taPy 4tta y Cl
e:L
y
t TH ►5 .3 G"CrP3 %
•'i r tL 'Jj. a' qtr (: alp i4 i in
ALI
't
7h
city {,y cpl t p .•. r s -
BY; 4'r3 a ter
„
O ¢.
i
Ill
- -tv'�,tl�
�s�I�ICr
+� X14WKS"Qs 54,,.tf9w14•(916)848.5994
11!111
Ala
WOr4 TO�,Tffler
��iiii •
�•
IMPLEMENTATION INFORMATION ON SB 1664 (Montoya)
f iiE "VESTEI3 RIGHTS °' BILL., Chap. 1113, 1934 Statutes
f February 1 835
Senate Bill IASP (Montova ?,Chapter lri3 a# the lg7lr
in di , ana recomes ea eetdve January Stnxl.tes was O�acted by the Legislature
subdivision m *:�, called a "v s n tentative 1936. The 411 - creates a new worm of tenta��ivc
df provaer that he or s1iL wilt be ab ooced �s3h v+hieh, Wen approver', ,uarantew� a
approval _ �Ir�velopnseRt in aXarR' ,;ce with
nts paper addresses the most common
references are to the questions o1 d;o offie 813
C California Government Code unless otherwise noted SB 1 664. All
Sections 66424.5, 66423, 66452, 66432.$ and 664ta3.F
through 66493.8, mends
,and adds Sections 66413 d ,�+d' 65493..1
!. UESTION: TO tVFie rXiNDS OF DEVELOPMENTS 065 % THE 1,vESTING TENTA%' E
fAA " L W PPLYi AcdStZtERs R
66493. 7), esidential devedopme"s f� only (f;ovctnMent Code Sept.
r p UESTtON• BY \
You must s" TO nply ar D DATE UST TE "COMPL'Y aVdTH 1f N�
and ur►a;odiRed y January 1y 1936, but Y*u may dLAW? o ANSWER-
66498.s
F� sec. 10 the bill).
MA QUESTION: 1�HA'i° IS A "VESTING .,
ES TENTATIVE MA AND DOES ONE OF TFIESE
AN"f D1Fi =E2ENT €ROM AN ORDINARY TE(. TATIVE MA:�� .
"vesting tentative r,1ap" 13 ba3l all y tkr saaae us au: otdi�ti;� tentative m `ANSWER- A
diYferena:e the state law rRqulres is than' ken artrr tai these "vesting" ,naps is filed the city or, county, the map must have conspicuously *oft ;printed in " , facer fil words
"vesting tentative nia d with
P" (Sec-'L 6ir4i4.3 atndr 66132).
R UESTION: HOW DC+ES TI'1 31L'L AFFECT CITIES' AND COUNTIES, POWERS TO
RE ULA..r UBDIVISYO,
or deniel. Tither the bids 1itgAs— "�piEFty° to chanEC,.anditions after tiler • '
UP i'o the tim. the is approved
s• UESTION- point.
THE CHANGES MADE BY SE 4660 AFFECT t9RDIh�AY TENTATIVE
MA No. It is an oCternative>
6• UESTIC3N. 13 THE!t: ANY DIFFERENtE.tei THE PROCESSING OF .TH�.SE M
I'' A 113 i, AY TEN 1ATIVE MAPS? ANSrdE;�:
Gavecn.�ient Code Section 6641, does whic the bid -dots nLi amend, MAPS,
�ixnds on you;tocal ordnances,
design and improvement ;af
subdivisions in rouiil <andsrds.
*,',4,n encted by the 6+111,Irasvides i'1at "vetin€ tentative rasaps" "ate to t: cot�trss? of ate
a of supervisors. Sec. 56432;
saale as tentative maps, �xe as otherwise provided by state tasa� or local grdinance.
be P 3c�ged the
'. vl_ssroN: PRIaR a
DEV 'L 7,,l APPRov�wG A '`v
O SUr^P1.1t " �E37INM MAP, CAN AVE R`E4'JiRE 'A a
THAN WE typ ON AN ORDINARY Y �V�TH MO. DEY...
r►1LS ON A DEVELOPbii:hlT F
-require - or permits. MAp, 6,NSWIIP: 9'e \ i
your Local
or4linance sa a
r
SU 2 (Y� {K iGt1,Is O APP l0' o F A VZgh15,V, `fit:? AkS G THE i?tause the r, TO
_ ,- •�= .3. i•iAT 14lI�HT t CCU
p ien thrjlVG" Mckp AM5`.irERa Because the sgRts
• approvals m�* : be conaistCnt S Y lr'tc±i,oi lme, ages because subaequerst
tamin of the it tha Map as ap�ovtdr YOU msy wish to change the ,
3 procexsin ..sot i`tiost or alk dis<jre iota
s +rnultpnrsiy with rn�p approval. Conse�uentl t approvals occur before or
developer r supply 'With map Tnfirrr tatton ycKr may wish to e�xnaider (Miring the
determine the impact of tla3 that your city or county needs to
as: Ikoiect an your tty Or county over: a period of years, such
- height, size, and location of auldinga I
- sewer, water, starpi drain and road 4ctails,
_ - information on th i V3" to w;slch ft buid:g ag$ -.* t be put -
- : stalled grading plans
• geological studies r+
- flood control in€armataon
- arcNtectural plans
- any other studies yow city l S +r� rshmJly defer; s,d i tt;� ulldin
>I 140m% ,3 "
PR M,E TIONt ' ThVIN ` C�3L1i 0SSlGAI= RSV ,MW 6CCtIR �C1R`� '4�rST1NG" `1v1Ag
h or prior f'th (nay wyouro'toasider doing daslgr' revamw'sitnultanaousiy
with c prior $o d other disc maps Your Cliy'or cOmty should probably review the Order J
in which this and other dascTetaorary.- approvals 0", Wild c�g� tl:e ordrr �o mat some
discretionary approvals rrc p'Messed with or pt* do,,, the ma so that l
approved, the details of the � oiect arr iaiowm P when thtr map is
de .bF,t_T WHAT" 'RIGHTs DOES tolls SILI, viVl A OLr1�fR.O1EitR THAT THE
ClEV L ES-NOT HAVI U�.O'ER CURRENT LAO RN t tJn�`� the lairs `.
once the "v"'prig" map is approved, the Cleve►
development 16 substantial compliance with the ocd rsancM y genera;dy pro; eed wi;�
effect -a the t;n a developer tiled a complete, i Policies, sr►d sta �sGtrds ��,
Exceptions are rr11de Where oc YdjV5e Ith � 4 - Ration with the city or comty
.4 hzatth or Safety, or (!s) violate ��' 3 � 'Feder door t ` atnmr t dCQefe endtn
Sacsger woT i
i� 66,493.1, d6os 61.i;' -
j a} ME5TIONs iF
CIR'r� " y CY*S CAN H OUNTy ca,�2i y EM'i i6 t
A *V RL MAP R a Ii. MST`
! IaERAw': AN5 rdERt only vrh(tit It niti_S cio ito to prat#ct public health �r safe2yDIN o
tompl}r with i�±'i Qr hdiia11aw` ;Sacs. 6 Sg:1� mtt
!2. tll"S 1cFNz CAN A CIrt Olt' COUNTY
ANS l '' is ,"rCLELY L3.�1 HE MOUNQ THAT THE MAP � A 'NVE5 LIS+tC"TY �Rp�. `
c ANSWEl2sb1y'riot.
_9NS NOW i.6TVv WAS, TAjE "KES T INN" COI*i it E ONCE �'FT EN' #'TV
MA l5 A t 6VEZ, Ai S E1� ",
plus t'rr r: V. to ,'hrea car`s Tug n ie of tgherig t' s l W--;t l a oral 3»x
ccdanai, y p ; �rt►COtdtdt
extensions, in pri yetssih tarns ti-s pt'•ixTs« rig "ot! :loepl
dutirrs.4I;1ch tnaa'atkrT�( art to effect or 'law 44 (plus zhy tip
30hbdule% f } rr
0701 --02 o 6 -8.88 PC Aae da o. 4- of 4
i _
n
a) Atltentative maps,, including "vesting" maps last from,two to six yeses, depending on v?
1ocaTaru! Ances and gxteasions (Sec. 66452.6)f plus
b) depending on local o. »'aces, the develfppek has either ors or two. years after the
final map Is "recorded to apply for a building, perm it, and the county or city ,nisy extend
that 4rc one mo -e year to a total of three ye,prs= (5re• b6�i32.b(g)) and
C) if the developer has filed a' complete application for (. bc: (ding pernttt; the rl t.
continues through the life of the building peemit (usually six inonthz), plus only extensions
the city gives on she he tim permit, plu'F processing tune for architectural rsview or
grading permits, if the time for prtoccssing those permits „exceeds. 30, days (Sec.
tJE371ON: lffYkT HAPPENS IF ,,n► DEVELOPER` LETS Cr!�d Of THESE TIt4j&
fiERlt� S ?CFIRE? ANSWER: The devplo r is
+v.re an ordinary applicant t � hoot the;U ghts giventby they vest s a e me as if he or she
iS. QUESTION- Hi5>V f1t� 1'HE TIME PI:RIt7DS DESCRIBED M 6�i ai? (Sec." b6 #9$,1).
PHASED DEVELOPMENTS? ANSWE U The time peiathatQrunSafter a firsat /ma TO
66452.6( commence on each p a' Me why the final map far that � _ P is
{ 66aS2 b(g�). „ phaz4( girded (Sec.
SUP UESTION• SECTION bb #+fll,T: PRpV1I3ES \_
SUPER-ArMAY CONDITIO-NALLIf APPROVE AAVEOUNGL MAP BOARD AS
INCONSISTENT WITH `LOCAL i:ONING, AND MAKE THE
"VESTING"
MpA PItC1Vq �i
CONTINGENT,.UPON THE REZONIWG i)CCURRI G. }IOW WE THIS APi;ECT pL;
i C JRREIVT PRACTICES? ANSWEV: Probably rest at all, A few jurisdictions process
maps that WI& Inconsistent avi z,"uning, conditioning approval of the neap on a later
rezoning. This .provision was inserted to accommodate sinose jurisdictions.
1T. UESTION :OUR CITY t1
AFP' OtivCIL OR BOARD OF StlPritVISORS HAS DELEGATED
COMMITTEE!, BUT ZONING ORDINANCES AIiST BIESAPPROVµa BY�THE REVIEW s
E 80ARI� OF
SUPERVISORS OR COUNCIL. WILL ;THIS DILL REQUIRE Us TO CHAINGE? THAT-
Process URIr ?" t No, But since you may be u3Ing a d'sftertint - procedure to
Process vtstYnll snap, yov ensY wish to consider whether the caurcii or
not delegate approval of "vesthir maps. board Wishes to
►S. UESTION• HOW DOES THIS LAW RELATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMEh f
LAW? AN W R: This bill was Conceived as an alternativt to development t
l pnmar: y or emaller projects. Because it is no, s ctsntract, bocci agencies wi$rhaveCless
discretion to deny applications or extract comes c ns from deveiaenci Also, unlike a
C = development agreerrent, a vesting map is not ref.reenda4de,
19. tJESTY r CAN WE REQUIRE A DEVELOPER TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT`
ttEMr not. AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL !�F �► "VESTING-
Probably I�iAP? AYV�SWgf� «=
f
E ZcT. ` UESTYt�N: WE HAVE HAD tCl C4fANGE OUR DEVELOPMENT 5iAldb
CC)MPLY %Vl H CHANGES Ih! STATE OR FEDERAL I:At1t. IF WE STANDARDS llti
able to requ're redesigns, or you may need to stop th HAVE
TO DO THIS'
6b #9$.6ibl2i 0roject iSecs. "4983(c), and
ik
r��5ricl�a ''THIS t-N �TAf'� MANt3ATEq Gfi�4T«
:> NS Ira "IO wE ajk�r n u try
W . ti xi:'g, a uncod1fied Sac, lt, q;i tj4 btli C# c li a�!!'�,tt et
c ear cull �#o %, rV +s�;,�eloperx who �FxHe "v ttn " rfix *e � r��
Coyer the cost Of earaeting � iactil ,oe d,a a� tb �C ice: A � tt�«nt x:�£td�rer �t as
a+zd to �york,ta,it rcinst�trs�e:twed t �t with (, Y Wish $a 4attemintt; post CXfxt�,
first severaA builders M+ifp. 1• YAK ltsr�}�tiidttt 'ass iikittra air v ah the
22. r1ESTiar�r: UNDER 4t RftE1V t, ,oq ' VE�IV� sEi°: CODE SE , /
5594 'et g.R -. lLi ?- t i '�t 9' � dk �6TY i�iSus -s' UP LY t�p� � �S WITH
r R PE at tOpUtNT RAND MUST dl�P'L1i M +# � Y LLE phi �� DAYS SON
AN J3PPLIC!iT16aN 15 ,FILER ,1R1itil ft TtiAr At PLIC,+iz'4..t� IS COMPLETE. # ow,5 '
DOES THIS i�iiy,L� ,-AFF ,Cyi��`y T. I, itt+ N v Ittxdoa mi, iki3t yo zs w rs+�yrd c
Opdato yotx lo�d'ti. asgfi ij you, y � ��!{`�.ij i Wr y '# ;may m *'
23. K CsuES"iicii;Tx 1`i wS RNA CCy%1 , ICTIOUS 524 t I'd deli, p.goVIoj
�r n�°' � i x ► 'I ie� RA= A "V tAla r u a
OR SHE F`ILMS,�, "CC►ik�P►.EY��tt* t1AP1n1CAXRom POAI l�tl`lT.oit i+ P MIT °itl'tNIN .A.
CiwkThlN ,TIMM PERIOD AFTVR :,TH�_l�iNA**. MAP SS AP OVW,
cant-Okal RIGHTS REW4 Fixio'Wlvu T'HA'T S RMIT`'i5,1�� i� 1 M011 T+m
NOW D4 'S Ci T ,ittntt� WHETHER 44 e S S'i..YCA +# !4i iSL ktN 1 iNdi`x
„+ CPL 7E"7 ANSI his . Si law do" nat us lR r is
x fir* count , � cities to Sist „
„ whrr. ?s rat, irt:cR ar i4o ` P J* be ►p *, You y wish rear �
cit)eo or CoNum" 4i�t b 16d r, Por;
pass rtt►3t opliCation z i +trhima 4nd
;.
the rtecittirett#ttt, .fit itt tad Sbr eeltertt+r BSst of
b!' bo�ri � #t9f .atrd icy` jrmj:F, y
#. t1R:a ,I+lSttii �c$ IZE AC bAvZLoPtRT0 APPLY
EXPIRE, AND" � . 1� A, :OCAL AQZNCY itJJ :� � GR i* �45�
CHANGES. 9f# ,'E SiTION1� MAY '' E r�.'i"1'"�'4CWl ,, � Li A d1�'PL1��►Rit?i'st
ANA !rO4 *&y mirth' %a M41de Scarab atttatdar�3 WW oC
bppltcattartn,, P4tr'lutP ,sdIxtln1uW*j ,b#ty stA%tuat%igt j stn t
specifyirt ivhethet� t„ hart "SenXftn,or do r+ * 1ett tlttRSt And
23. tyStIrkw TNT VtZS E
CHARGE OMVELnptK5 ChtihaCE FROM 'TjMF�To TW14
130 N1l IditE 'Al•Io A11f 3 At S`. N WZ A�"1F�S' QVZ TI°iL° 1AAP SN A` -4 THi�T,
1ir1LL d►LLQ'iRt �,tS Tai >r�E TR�S PEES IN I:FI:C'd 4'S`HE T+llr i�� I
PIRMIT t5 l,� upao, RA'Tkk THAN *MEN THE M 1S APPRov i'47 ��t1�G
' ds, wi r rs axci far ?ihe �s of ' r,Saa' tee ! _ jffi- h
teohtaln a caoWltS+set * t t� 1ittT:9W1t t tC VW-
,,�taSe. Howlt�ee!",� ,?�tt At'tsb�xly ��,b� sdded�'t tlta,�buS��at �tS.ding i+e�i ~.
for public IfWth of xrfetig rem 10 ,amply WAll stttte
iit►9RI +1�C� +il1CI ��.� ?. Yi
C
1
0,