No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/09/28 - Agenda Packet/0701-02 9- X28 -88 PC Agenda o 1-of 5 a 1 CrIT OF RANCH(:) CL:CkN1S ` Pr,'1,Ng'Gt7- vI11�II55IN AGENDA WEDNESDAY SEPTEM,BRR 28,1988 7:00 P.M. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roix can Commissioner Blakesley Commissioner Emerick Commissioner Chitiea _ Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Toistoy IM Annoummments IV. ' Approval of Minutes September 14,19 88 Y. Cament Calendar: - The following Consent Calendar items are ,14)ectOd to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted an by the Commission at ore time without discussfon. If anyoae has concern ever any item, it should be removed for discussion, A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13442 - BAYWOOD DEVELOPMENT - The design review of building e'pvations and detaaed site Pla;l for 88 lots of a previousir,Approved tract map consisting of 152 single family lots on 14.8 acres of land in the Low- Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 I dwelling units per apre) within the Victoria Planned 1 Community located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way APN: 227-541 -58 to 67; 227-551-46 to 60, ?27 -581 -2 to 32, 59 to 76; 227 - 591 -23, 24. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW-88-28 DAMON DECROW - The y development of a 49 bed hospital tataiing 05,00 &'square feet ,on 1.9 acres in Vie Industrial Park District (subarea 7), located west of White Sink and at the termit us oY` -. nruce Avenue APH- 208 - 351- r C, TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 8578 SANTA -2E DEVELOPMENT COMPArY - A division of 131 acres of land into 14 parcels within tt,. lnimum Impact Heavy industrial Area (Subarea 9) located on the south side of Arrow Route, east and west of Milliken Avenue r APN: 229-111-23. D. ENVIRANMEN"',AL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPML`uP REVIEW 88 -2G- LEIdNON ARCHITECTS - The development Gf an office, manu�^ fa� cturinf�s an warehouse building totaling 29,860 square feet on i 3.5 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the lndustrial Area Specific Plan, located on the south side of Sharon Circle east of Hermosa Avenue - APN: 209- 261 -23. 2. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -33 BBARTON DEVELOPMENT - The request for a Master Conditional Use Permit to allow a combination of, specific office and wholesale uses within the Jersey Business Park, located north of 3'erley Boulevard and west of Red .Galt Avenue - APN: 209 -x -19,20,21. F. RESOLUTION .OF DENIAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT gg_2g gER.IiY - Thg development oP a 5,915 square foot retail buUaing on 0.52 acres of land within an existing shopping o *nter in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill 13pectile Plan, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard ands''A alaehite Avenue APN: 206- 251 -20. ' VL Public Hearings The following items are public hearing's in which concerned individuals may,abioe their opinion of the relnted project. Please wait to be recogk }zed by the ,:airman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. G. ENVIROXM: ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT $8 - 038 - QUINTESSENCE DEVELOPMENT - A request to amend the land use map of the General Plan from Park to Very Low Residential (less than two units per acre) for 3.85 acres located on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road- APN: 1061 - 691 -11. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL FLAN tl.MENi?21IENT NO. 88- 3C - UNITFX - A Tequest to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Very Low Density Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) to General commercial for 57.5+ acres of land located south of 24th Street between Cher.y Avenue and the I -15 Freeway, The Planning Commissio.- w:i J,consider other appropriate General Land Use categories (Nel; hborhood Commercial and Office) - APN: 226- 121 -08, 11, 17, and 226- 112 -03. 0 p L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ErIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88-05 - UNITEh - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan Map from 1NL1 (Very Low Density, Residential, 1 -2 'Welling units per acre) to "GC" (General Commercial) for 57.5+ acres of land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway; ` and from "PC" (Freeway Commercial) to JtGC" (General Commercial) for 5.5 acres of land at the westerly junction of Cherry Avenue and . yN% I -15 Freeway. The Planning Commission will consider the other appropriate Etiwanda Specific Plan land use estegories (Neighborhood Commercial, Convenience Commercial, Fix;eway- Related Commercial, Office /Professional) - APN: 226-121-C8,11,12 and 228.112- 0$. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLAN __GENERAL AMENDMENT 88-03E - WILLIAM LYL�N COMPANY - A request to amend two sites of the land we mep of the General Plan within the Victoria Groves (west of Milliken on 9.3 acres) and Victoria Vineyards (east of Milliken on 12.9 acres) Villages of the Victoria. Community Plan. The request proposes the switching of land use designations from Medium High Residential to Neighborhood ° - mmcrcial between the two sites - APN: 227- 011 -•22, 202 -2.1 x9. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COt'IibfUNITY PLAN AidENITM:ENT 88 -07 - NILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to amend the lend use designations within the Victoria Groves (weu of Milliken on 9.2 acres) and Victoria Vineyards (east of Milliken on 12,9 acres) Villages of the Victoria Community Plan. The request proposes the s witching of land use designations from Medium High Residential to Neighborhood Commercial between the two sites - APN: 227 - 011 -22, 202- 211-48. L. MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL A -'ESSMENT (MRA) AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT - REpORT EIR FOR THE RANCHO c.UCAIviONGA GENERAL PLAN TECHNICAL UPDATE - CIiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � A comprehensive study to Identify the environmental characteristics and constraints of the Generai Plan area. As an MEA, the document will provide a central source of current environmental information to assist in Identifying long range, areawide, and cumulative impacts of individual projects proposed in the General Plan area. M. GENERAL PLAIN TECHNICAL UPDATE -CITY OF RANCii€2 CUCAMONGA - The project is the prepriation., review, and adoption of :a Technical update of the General Plan consistiog Of statistical information and Implementation measures, and revisions to the Community Design section of the Land Use and Development, Element. l;` I N. ENVIR,ONMEW11 1 ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCFL MAP 105¢7 -- ,gESTERN PROPERTIES - A subdivision of 16,53 acres og And into Q parcels in the Terra Vista Planned Community Iodated on the southwest corner of Church Streit and Terra Vista ParkwLy - A.PN; 1077 - 421 -05, 09, 10. O. VA131ANCE 88-19 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to utilize rn-s %reet parkin► to meet the parking requirement for a model ii Mme sales complex located on the northeast corner of Victoria Park Lance and Fairmont Way in the Low- Medium Densi:i Residential Distriet within the Victoria I Planned Community - APN - 202-211-13, 14. P. VeyMANCE 88 -20 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to ut lize on- street parking to meet the parking requirement for a model home sales comN10X located on the west aide of Benevento Place in the Low- Mediur.''. Density Residential District Within the Victoria Community - APN: 227- 081 -04, 10 and 11 i Q. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 88 -01 - HARRY C M - A request to conduct Ii. ; comedy acts, sports c1 iebritles and ehees3; oaf promoting sports teams, lip -sync ,;ontests, hair and clothing fashion shows, Mi3s Hawaiian i'ro�.o Beauty Pageant and s request to continue "disc jocke3" doing vocals and playing records nightly in conjunction with a restaurant /night club, located at 10877 Foothill .',oulevard. R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12585 - O'BRIEN - A subdivision of 0.58 acres of land into 3 parcels in the Lour Residential Development District, located on the south sloe of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue M APN 208- 85149, 10. S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-8-2-10 --HILL—SIDS COMMUNITY CHURCH -- The _ development of a Master Plan for a church consisting of a sanetunry, adm *. istration b tildin i. , education/nursery t building, and family center on 8.5 acres of land in the Very Low Residential Distract located on the west side of Haven between Carrari Street and hillside Road - APN: 201-101-25. T. ENVIRO14 1,`,P',1TAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PEiiiYiIT 8 38 - HiT,LSIDE GOMP/fUNITY CHURCH -� A j request to install a modular building 40° i; 144' fok a church classroom (Sunday School) facility on 8.5 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District located on the west side of j Haven Avenue north of Hillside Road - APN: 202 - 113145. II U. EN MONMENTAL ASSESSTviENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13527 - MELCHER - A residential subdivision of 252 single family lots on 88 Beres of land in the Love Residential Designation (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Estiwanda Avenue & 24th Stmet - APR: 225 - 071 -05. VIL Old Busiq► V. r 'AIVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANL " DEVELOPMENT REJIEW 88-02 - ARCHITECTURE ONE -The development of an inc�jstrial complex compri efi of seven (7; building totaling 55,546 square feet on 9.13 agres of lard in the General Industrial Designation (4uoarea 5) of the Industrial Area speci£ie Man, located at the southeast corner of Fifth Street and Lucas Ranch Road - APR: 21f:- 071 -37, VLIL. Directory Reports W. STATUS REPORT -` PEDESTR;AN ACCESS EASEMENT LO(;A';EI) BETWEEN LA PAZ COURT A A ALON STREET TRACTS 12838 AND 127241 Ix. Commission BIness X. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the. Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not alrsudy appear on this agenda. XL Adjoemmen+i The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment tine. If items go ,beyond that time they shall be heard only with the con.P2nt of the Commission. i a;" 111 f �4IAfl1� th I1 RYa�1�.YAR AfPROPt CrrY OF RAnCHO CUC1. M M" CITY OF RIINCHO CUCAMONGA w. s STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of The Punning Commission FROM: Brad Bailer, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT. 13442 DESIGN REVIEW BAYWOOD DEVELOPMENT tie design review of u ng a eva ons an a af °ed site plan for 83 lots of a previously approved tract map consisting of 152 si�•agle family lots on 14.8 acres of land in the Low - Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Planned Community located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APN: 227- 541 -58 to 67; 227- 551 -46 to 60, 227 -581 -1 to 32, 59 to 76; 227 - 591 - 23,24. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and plot pTs. 3. Project Density. '5.6 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: ort - acan ; ropose sc oo site So sth - 'acant; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant; Low- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) West - Vitcant; Low- Medium.Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Desi nations: roaec Site - ow- rum ensity Residential North - Low- Medium Density Residential South - Low- Medium Density Residential East Low- Medium Density Residential West - Low- Medium Density Residential. ZEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 13442 - BAYWOOD DEVELOPMENT September 28, 1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS• A. Background: Tentative Tract 13442 was reviewed by the Planning osston an Flay 27, 1987. The .applicant at that time (the William Lyon Company) received approval of subdivision layout and conceptual grading. Baywood Development has acquired a Portion of the site (83 of the 152 total lots) and is now submitting plot plan and building elevations for design review approval, B. General: The three plan types proposed are two story snits ranging in size from 2,150 square feet to 2,575 square feet. All units include three car garages. Plan 2, however, proposes a two car opening with the third parking slot being tandem to one of the front two spaces. This third space is intended to accommcdate parking of such vehicles as boats , motorcycles, etc. There are three elevations proposed for each unit. The three themes are Spanish, Mediterranean and Ranch styles. The Spanish and Mediterranean styles include "s" -tile roof material and stucco facades. The Ranch style features flat roof tile with horizontal siding facade. Consistent with Planning Commission policy, the side and rear ANIL elevations of al units have additional architectural details. Details such as window trim, and changes in materials and /or color to create variety and interest to all sides of the homes have been provided. C. "Des Review Committee: The Design Review Committee a es ey� Ml- lea - o eman) reviewed the proposal on August 18, 1988 and recommended the following revis 'ons: 1.. All elevations are very similar in mass and form which creates a very consistent street scene. The Committee suggested that, for variety, one house plan and /or elevation could have a lowered or modified roof line over the living /dining area. 2. Decorative fencing should be provided between homes. No wood fen;ikt2 should be exposed to public view. 3. Replot the floorplan mix to avoid excessive repetition �I of same plan in a block. i I rr_ if 1� lu 1C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT 13442 - BAYho00 DEVELOPMENT September 28, 1988 Page 3 4. Wherever possible, pair garages to create larger areas o� front yard landscapirg` and to provide streetscape variety in the piacemant of garages and driveways. The Committee (Chitiea, Blakesley, Buller) reviewed and approved revised plans addressing the above concerns at their September 8, 1988 meeting. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent pith the victoria Planned omnun�y and the Oenepal Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause YA gnificant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use is in compliance with The applicable provisions of the Victoria Community Plen, the Development Code and,City Standards. IV. RFCOMMENOATION: Staff - recommends that the Planning Commission approve a design review of this portion of Tract 1,442 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Respectfully submitted, 4C Bra B ler City annex BB :BH:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Ma UNibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "0" - Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions CITY OF PLANNING DIVISION ] ITEM s Q- lA l3442 TITLE: L2.2,8110N MAP EXHIBIT: —.A-__. SCALE: none 11 RANCHO 0 (*Y OF _ A PLANNING .. rp A ITEM.- OR TPTJ daaaao TITLE: SITE tLaM EXHIBIT: --9_ SCALE:,." W] %SE TKXE 1"m E PHASE TWO ilium OL A /MALL wm N® H J.�A1�C�3'C� C�JCA�1Vi�i1�GA �����. ®� �� ����� I'IAhT�iING� DIVISION T�cLE: -� ��� �L� A _/ EXHIBIT: —.C—_ SOLE:. none 44 lmw"rrlf-n Elm .-M-110115 1. . �*, Fm µ� OF ANGifo CUC PLAN ING DIVISION mm.sm Fm l ITEM: _=2R- TR 13442 TITLE:. ELEVATIONS x. IIjlOpdgip. �`t�� • .■ crtr -2 awr we ITEM. — i)R TR — TITLES EXHIBIT.--Q& �n��e L a h RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION f APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A PORTION OF TRACT N0. 13442 LOCATED - 'WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND KENYON WAY IN THE LOW - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN: 227- 541 -58 THROUGH 67 227- 551 -46 THROUGH 69, 227 - 581-1 THROUGH 32, 59 THROUGH 76; 227 - 591 -23, 24. A. Recitals. f - (i) 6aywood Development has filed an application for the Design Review of a portion of Tract No. 13442 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinaftew, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 28, 1988, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuccimaonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resclution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby foulad, deternined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranch) Cm=anga as follows: 1. � This Commission Hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows- 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Alan; and 2. That the proposed design is in accord with the ob ntive of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed design is in compliance ttith each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed design, together with the � conditions applicable thereto, will not be f detrimental to the Rsk"r `wealth, safety, or welfaro, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. -13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 13442 BAYWOOD DEVELOPMENT September 28, 1988 Page 2 and 2 3. Based upon tee findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 oinstheeattachedtStandardeConditions and everyvcondition0set for thh below wand attached hereto and incorpor:fted herein by this reference. PLANNING DIVISION: (1) All conditions of Resolution No. 87 -84 approving Tentative Tract 13442 shall apply. (2) The develaper shall provide each prospective buyer with written nutice of the potential Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. design of iha siftya'rd`. fefitjogx inc#udiiiq :'gate, visible from the street shf7l consist of a decorative material, TN final der3gn of the fencing steall. be ,terci.ec anti approYed by. t h 0 Oily` ,71itom9r. ENGINEERING DIVISION:, ��.. A :lft line adjustment f0i- 'lots 1,2,' and 3 shall be completed prior to issuance of butldfhg guts., 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2hth DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHu CUCAMONGA BY:r rry c e , a rman ATTEST: ME oullers Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuclmonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Cite of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: :0MMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: N > qr cu d O N y � O CL' 0 m Q c�a W I] fift KP Orhlinw P... Qu ity sugQUQ tu�uo uil «i 6 c°cv � 'tea cSA.epp ° 'r 0 yrn.yy C N ?uNS 0 � y0'yepq N� 7614 CYO � N i C I ['b� _ g vay »a'$ $���'.�' Ti =..°. Kea YOONVw�rwL U �".CM N$... N 1► ;. 41.V iL4 �YN W. yC �.y e_■ Y``ttCC C +uy3 O ELY+f.. y N`YNVV.�!�OVY. w CNnN. T ae w G L gS % al -3�O yNC y y ° h 6�w si >p i ^^M yq 6 p oL� Ir Ip. «3 Vw fjt1V� +' - y sr'J a Cc Wg YO yY� V sGmZF.2g g$� w +es NNC 4 � Its; Du ay> wab'i.�Cld ww V YYN fi °wN Yw Y �O�p TyO Y pYw9 wCyi T�G� NO L IV TC izN pp$p�. N• 1 y y U a�i x w H Y a S� N CD M yy y {V!y p QQQQQQ s C L S pA� NO y� = rL a3 tJa9 Yy �' Q °o LLJ 4J O. a V r 0g 1 FL., m6 �4 ~YN .e yaGj N Gam. ice.. Ci !Mlit y iOt±�yy�''tt���Qy1'C I CO Z r �5� aZ w is ^�'.� §64veLfA ms �wl8161��y� y �Y• W6ffiC Y O O ;O �y ®.UNL �TaO • al3 � � yQ1 u 4 +w. u +C6 i 4se YaiV� ytly p6 m rU ��s �jpppp441 �~ N��N +Nl.Mw. H s U H 1 Cy O j.. W R 4�,d L V `' u y N v �t 4 Rag's .24-a 6 —� O p�� C d_s C N c�dL ^O O u O �iY qY u y L s¢ 9=31 t � Z,V Oy m. Y �O O N— - ya r N y • 1 fQEM ` y a ELM �5a N � y� `y aNV N i l�i1 } tl N F z «� O - N . v r u wZ MM: ' Vt i �3 r L y y 9 L u i9 a C �^ r, p� � C r�'€ y' L O � -s tl at A� a v »30 `rte ee b m0� y^ a� is E' -4E K— N� r � 4a gift r V a D r v NF bp' 2Y3 -Z$ as $ Y {aiY 6 Yp. L yVy N q Ivy Zia cic�oi+� GaN Y Q r y w1 L CZ p yy C ow^ L u N Y VOY�y�j Qq..O �Nrs YyN�! acs —Ail +��Y PCY �aLO�'� °�'. .°Ssa^$g.� gg ui O-Lp�j� Y GY. PCCC� ,� N a ^o �= =sad go qsy �Yp` �a'pppyyygq+ is ON C 6 6 C N~ g y��C�p�` ■eC O C Y G Y p G OA aUW _M YTY CC..i— fLi �may�yv �YY �® �� � 01— �y- ic °$.up. �yVGY �LU:sz$ YYy G� II�.c ®o`C OLY ``SyD V�> Y �i0Y e gs VO L Y C Y y C yYLN 1Y Y�fgd UFO! ^ O a G I I I1 1 4�,d L V `' u y N v �t 4 Rag's .24-a 6 —� O p�� C d_s C N c�dL ^O O u O �iY qY u y L s¢ 9=31 t � Z,V Oy m. Y �O O N— - ya r N y • 1 fQEM ` y a ELM �5a N � y� `y aNV N i l�i1 } tl N F z «� O - N . v r u wZ MM: ' Vt i �3 r L y y 9 L u i9 a C �^ r, p� � C r�'€ y' L O � -s tl at A� a v »30 `rte ee b m0� y^ a� is E' -4E K— N� r � 4a gift r V a D r v NF bp' 2Y3 -Z$ as $ Y {aiY 6 Yp. L yVy N q Ivy Y Y® V � Z 6 �f C a O g` N OI C V ar O L n'. r KV A C. �iiV ii MM yN Zia O i�O GaN Y Q r y w1 L CZ p yy C ^ �.yCMM tl yN { ,w.P O acs —Ail +��Y PCY ge5 ^*�Y C��•Y{��y ui O-Lp�j� Y GY. PCCC� ,� N a ^o �= =sad go ° j v CLiz '� 2. -L a g °f ! `T yOIO�OVVyNN v u�.a ssO'L � 6 ~ � � X5 aO' [Y a 2� u ` e gs VO L Y C Y y C fl3 ' UFO! ^ O a Q.a .A. CyN pp.7O CV `¢ii MN »ij''i �Stl ^� 2,11 LLCM V OI�rJ' >•j�y C4; P ^iY .9pp V rd yL HIM '4 p10 va 12,51 � 2CI as 6L.giVMS N6�. N Y Y® V � Z 6 �f C a O g` N OI C V ar O L n'. r KV A C. �iiV ii MM yN 6 L O i�O GaN Y Q r y Y O V nY Le — ~e yN { ,w.P O acs —Ail N 30 NNa ge5 ^*�Y O� ui O-Lp�j� Y GY. PCCC� ,� N a ^o �= =sad go V LYsH.y� app. y 4 � ii �C-s+^ � Y • ^ � K. C ='y. � � w y r — C YNyi�r« sy vNOVCQI�9 u�.a ssO'L yY ^O VOa C6 =app. C.CO sO� Of Cw� VYi�COp O. YAN tlC Yr y yam$ U. �7 Ni yS V w� ®O ypp+,^ Oby O 7 V G1L 0OO GY 7MM Fy H4� u. �,a NK 6L A I __14 JA A YJ 13 L] 11 Poor ouenty Yr GvL CR If s OppC.'pCCO OY�L >NL q� 1; 7LwO.��VO ~b b'1- b ^ °.S ' �ao� C p C 4 L CV4a VO. VW.nO �� U O(J «S tW yNf L4r�Y C;� v evbL CT V O ^y�aN a� a e•� SL ;�.". q. r3 a�roo°, �.� ��'rr��. `4 '� �a5rd j. L.�c� E�• `q4d� o_v+ 41[ M,.. +/ L _C A 11. y° glgw ^.P' =p aN t VN^VV 24 CL• Nu Cpryali yyV N� Y L Cq MN �yq �j �U =YY.�'.bQ� OCV L7 a � Cc'r N�V � � Y�NL�L Gp � nn ^ � �09� ! 0 � . Cotlld (tea C9l. N }, r y6y L 0 1 fJ�PNi' e .� Ce M � +q � g + °C p�wSb J ouc•Y� L � . �� 4�nyi yy w yO .4 y N aNu: dSVi{�?G N O ��HCy I's S. NOV w 1 "V cC .nsY4{zWWN1dYg!. n1e 4umin ;Y Q s"C Oz �s�ixfi f ; ! `Z tf z % -I zy �°S QN O{ y1 ^ M C°CN y I � ♦, O��L •u,C °aw Iy°+ ^.° d ;� RN6a�-q� �5 =� `f. gnLs YIL�Q 1 fll"pL' QVO! 1q��y �N[.LNiS &q Sy Lw�N 01 aws S'E 44i y~Lq®.Mnf.. M�yy' t N Lnq .7i'"gN. OYL n,nM,,. >c"_N 6" ° '0`'+'• CC .—Igo �byyYa'y `$ G` Ls�wa. N"yl iA O E, bL 7C Y°�e�....38 ; °'3... 4 N L L W T. L � � .a q.� Y � G► .� "' OI OI y w +rR� �.� �' P r...�. 'C Q. .het. a i u <A.•qi QN ?NO 1'••N� QN y��0�011MWY C 4 wt. �CnC'OrL V.9 <qw �. q VD ILG ZGW 1++ a r .0 f Gg r 'rti op' ws3 °e $ c a+ f - 0 oc AL pll u 0 � N gn■qN¢ ��v�y aA :•r. q �, aq•�r L.N. `�,G y�Y�;Y L u -a 6J3 YY{{ _� CO,pI ®� NC� X01 S M. q�n. N �. NS q M1L► ���C 3� g0.p0 yVV^`on �C . Oq q GY r —" T 93,; law vZa fall k8 $f w N N ns 0 v� � tt i3 1v s-. N n+oat a e p Y Ol -10 f lu M.qa 666 g4CC n �.p A L •mm M r `3 IGw VtyC °YM M LV .� .O^ 'LIE L �s•' �fM{. � .M Y9 °O ^bC l �Iw S i �N 4V `w �3j ]V yi L y�C V�^ CGluq V L u S <7C'N •' MF F y "VO O' '1YN L 6 1 w <a V M N <w ? 'vL Y A 4Vl YOfL �i �Kyno �w y C . q q pL. . N R'JI � SN iG V i4 • N'C U e YNY^ Vz < Lv z G R L fy ^y fy <IriG. x sw p0 ~ C W L �6M�MM. N M f Y1 q M t Oid, 0 �rV(w LyN VwO�?S q�eRL;; `CSCC a^ b LbL'' G■■CII pp% �V� GpCV R�M p "duo' CL�'jq� fuY1`q 6 ACC ^yam ,gl�YY jr ■u n- 1i JH ♦ q�w O)3°OISY 31p .yN N.. Cyr,Y NI uy3 al^ Y dY 6 �Vm G ■■ <C6R Z `T. ^ -3-- + p L u'Y'g �dsoyN�"' N. `{ �asq+l'• jig F y Q xLn T Vi yx�� + dVCO #� �i nro.. w w�awr C' {mow NY p Ld y Y y Y y. ebi $r d of 1511 r�.Od btR �ti ���C[[[,�l N� .O.V Q, �tiON �p'tlVV '�� ^ZV'ppA qd H.- Chi - qY Y(�IL Y L Y ^�N 4ttYS.tl aaq�yyv= 't'pgs oegS $a ytjb�C �o 6Y� ws= _\ N Y i Y AQJM V AN Vw Lyy W4d Y�i q9M+ ani QLrF�t� 9_... sub tea«: tt + Nei L pV .!.4w w�Q :it} use .. $ im +�aiLi eS.tirg, a. Y j p oy ``_ t 8i �3 . „N ¢ Y+QY^ •�T�.+.ti �N^A �'4 �. � LO • w t-1 _ o py L 2C3 ty. H �L1W YrJ w 6 7vtl Hf �O to i T ' wC«!�'n�$ _ �: fig. y��{� C • vp� ON� M VMS i�1' .� �eiL = a*'r vie �Qj pv Y G �a $,wi Ya It a's v A L M y q � V . .Q 9 Aw q ; q 43 v L ^TL •.. \.N.� ' � B�YO0 V p YO (yy0�� M ®N� N w >�4 CH ��P. jv VBE p4.� lit y 1 �•` '`�Yy� y ..A.i rr. 0 C01. O$ «... LC4 . - Vy ��� q'4 L3 �LCN .w $emu. ! y gi� ■q m s ]fit= y a i 0 :Z* E O y��� g� JA Yz V °oa''si « N _ e° caaiia p °'�`°pL °pL _may �.L,°'syL' 1p a C Y_pp! QN.�:W N_N -2 i4 `Cy °N C �NY 4ijX .rO cd LO `e •g Vag ZAz It'.. Oy 0th^ gyOY m� � aN a- fi N�1 .. U.8 y� � L' tl Y� �•I pr 5 Mal e3tl A� y.N^ sib Y Y � 7 + KI rNN Ki rV1 N CpVCr� V N s Y U=,r p�C y . ii`lw- Y w'O . ^¢4 J-H Se Nb • a�ytl� i Aq$ $ NQQ VV Y L F VCCq ■4 u A y > C f �1 Alp 11 Original Poor QUililty dy8 1l �+a�f1O 1 ` w�4• C gabp�a'� iS� � � � Y L�N1♦. Y $� .. $ v Y c K !C :11 �D■ �yyA �tsi 7�� C[Y�. $� OW Y qV LS �� p`� �.�or✓ ^a 'j N.., ,.Y � L! vY �e�o r'rJ 1 N cis y' fL• Y. M. .ai Y ^ � � � 0 � � Q w` y L C {�y ppy�y YY Y4, `yyyy� CY4 C 9� Y` 6 a Myz g zzv 9 H^`nY.L4w � V O ur 01R YT 4 ~ Y~ Y 1u ^a ��.r S A • � 1 a�VS. vA u'+333 couuo$i a +-g2�t 38 bst L� b� i w ��N ♦ g PTL vx Opp 'CYY C. ^Q �a +�oC .n Vv� 9(CSC�S 1 °ggo �`�' °°«� c °r Y.^.w" •S a f�y'11 °y♦Y *Y ;V 4-C is 2� $afg'' a+ 3x v °. 8 is .aYyyg�iu��. as 3 94 : Cl G Qr Aar A� �. 'p`+�8 � �� j i. yj�� MS o e , -js c& as ♦Y,e i a ~°a� 4= '2 y zoo, flu —a-Z.-z.i Is Z.Mov N CaP$$ „.� p♦. 6 M C QYa 1W» ma 1w � � +�f ^wQi� '•��; WNO WVY .T� Rf2 '- YdO; W4 AMU �` +�4a X63i^ 11 L S Y L C • W a. v O L _d L O �Y _e$ Y a 4 C C M (1 upG di M Y L 0 TO Yya 3 Ld m� Y L/ Y rs y e u' �i A N Q as a p S L 6 N N o^ N� N � yY W x b N V � • u >, 3&Z �� 3 Gip �i O y yy' fjO yy6 pOaf 'o,C L � n6- M 3u a was Nti✓ N! O L c � ✓ g "TV it GN + t 004' Lo, N ti� 4.9.2 -0 y0 �/ rY Oi - 4Y Poor \! ---2A ✓ ^ r ` qw S , hY L LOy r•�G> �WC L.Cy �. O N ait\i p^.'�Ct G C y� N$ O .• �tlY L Ny'G9 -.05 ty� p✓ �1 ^t6� �w�.Lp�T O N r7t ' O $p _ OL Z. M Vya NC ry LYa w✓ � O � G Y u O eC1^ w y` p aY yEa C uj �fN ei`Nd.t• .gi0 �ayLy ��.�. • ViV op'o eEa._. p. CCCC Y. VC&I NOW; Y Lt C ^y` o c ' 8 Q.5 Y L �a+Y o `wna 34 aj C �V - -YL9 Y qw •p C N Y g otV+ oC L 4` Y -' YN M: � ice. LO C L8-9 iv V �� °a dr�'e`a w 'a S. O■ G� .fry �yyNV�Y�Q �yyb ^ GLas� 0.�_VN G 9� `{y�� L 'OYy� M O. +. d1N �i� ° 'L �OS O `N Y Y\4 (� Yp $ �Y E Gi FNGQ gip, -egg. y '* L O� OY� , Y LS ~ D$pa^ C,Yp + ^W N yq�YOG S ar Y� �Lf"P r ✓Cww y `Rbw •- C3 = N da.+ wC P S'Nr�.✓. � 6a�Y c °u✓�p �c`� �� a •Y. �' yb� ^$°Y(6� y �OM4i �. y'" sYY� N� ►f`t !Y�� p� C �inr c 6 Yt' ,q9op � NV `'h t( 6{i 0 OI why CS 'N tl$Y3 dt EZ; ^ � H � ti .9 Y1 ! YYyym` F� ra mw�S YOY ~Q, FN yy7 AGM i L S Y L C • W a. v O L _d L O �Y _e$ Y a 4 C C M (1 upG di M Y L 0 TO Yya 3 Ld m� Y L/ Y rs y e u' �i A N Q as a p S L 6 N N o^ N� N � yY W x b N V � • u >, 3&Z �� 3 Gip �i O y yy' fjO yy6 pOaf 'o,C L � n6- M 3u a was Nti✓ N! O L c � ✓ g "TV it GN + t 004' Lo, N ti� 4.9.2 -0 y0 �/ rY Oi - 4Y �V ` a Y 4 a�i NGS10 ^_ gyp p +. p N$ qy7� {Md Ai all it Ck� y .. so— `JR. 31` —�- u.o � M Vya ao LLLL aV5 .2z 'q O w✓a ^~ ^ G Y u 4 j I nuY 5!= q eC1^ w qY ei`Nd.t• .gi0 �ayLy ��.�. • ViV O ^ f�. ♦✓ �Y p. CCCC Y. VC&I NOW; Y Lt C ^y` rC� yy r 3 —v= ' N ID G I N C r 11 t0 IA a sv �. C° °$ �� Sa a °.. x �� °sa a ... L W a HE M Y V 1c ^�Y aCY 6 C O r�^ ° gE N w ^ O �w YyY O MAY CAS y■C ° ` ti N L Y � � O + O� ° w Y b � ( I I cam^ YY pp SIN, Eva •.. °3 ^YY `EV s ^ ^� O.x QK YE dopy i N Z. ' C c4� w v CL �;E N iz - vpuo E& as IL 3 V w Ipv wo 2 Nc wLp .5 Y O Mid nG �f atit `V OI d 3 b K Y �• . .• �+E s±�a Ofy'i. 6aG p� CA yyggFA i�`11 `»L E ^ ^ep s �OW NNa YY YUY O a' ,' �•a u 4w YM w YyyY 6E ��.2148 ^ 0I e ...Od�p(1 Z ep N Y M i K C E NLYY'i• p YQ y LY O V L C V C �b C +a.�.. is Y L O a L 1 C 3 Z i ^K_1 G 4r Y aL L 4 A NYKY 1qqYY. S 'Y Y Y _� _uY GC� aY K ■�. V �� C� yyG `. L N W a t o �. I cam^ YY Eva •.. °3 ^YY `EV s ^ ^� O.x QK YE dopy i N Z. ' C c4� w v CL �;E N iz - vpuo E& as IL 3 V w Ipv wo 2 Nc wLp .5 Y O Mid nG �f atit `V OI d 3 b K Y �• . .• �+E s±�a Ofy'i. 6aG p� CA yyggFA i�`11 `»L �OW NNa NN E CITY OF RANCHO CUCA2WNGA STAFF REPORT ONSE: September 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Fianner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -.'.4 e aevelopme n o a '49 ge o pita1 iling�OH square feet on 1.9 acres of land in the Industrial Park District, Subarea 7, located west of White Oak and at the terminus of S ^ruce Avenue APN: 208 - 351 -78 and 79. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. ,'surrounding Land Use and zoning North Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) South - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) East - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) Nest - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics This site Is vacant without significant vege a ono er than grape vines. Curb and gutter have been installed along White Oak, howev�Ar, upiveways and parkway improvel*nts such as sidewalks hate not been completed. The site has a natural slope to the south. IN- j - 4 , TTrM 11 PLANNING commiSSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -28 DAMON CLC,':4 September 28, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Nu�iber of Tvoe S­iare Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Hospital 45,000 1.75 Be 156 per 5ed II. ANALYSIS: A. General The proposed hospital use was approved under on on al Use Permit 87 -17. Individual phases require Desi,n. Development Review. This Phase II developement varies free the master plan approval, however, significant environmental impacts have not been created by the changes. Plaster Plan revisions associated with -this Phase Ii development will be presented to the Planning Commission ofter Design Review consideration on September 22, 1988 After the Planning Commission acts on the environmental determination of this Phase I1 and approval of the modif' ^ation to the Piaster Plan Conditional Use Permit, final approval with conditions will be granted by the City Planner. B. Design__ Review Committee: The Design Review Committee !McKeii, To-Fs-td-y-, Coleman) rev awed the project on September 8, 1988 and mad= the following recommendations for conditions of approval. 1. Texturized pathways shculd be Included in the c -erall site plan to help direct pedestrian flow primarily to and from the parking areas. 2� Sufficient space for landscaping should be provided ad$acent to the building. The south faces of the building were of special concern to the Committee. A suggested minimum is 5 feet. All service areas must be screened from public circulation areas, both vehicular and pedestrian, through the use of a combination of landscape and architectural screen walls. 4. Special paving should be used for walkways and doctor /employee entrances as well as main entrances art: walks. 5. Sound and visual buffers should seprate the emergency and main hospital entries. PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT PEVIEW 88 -28 - DAMON DECROW September 28, 1988 Page 3 6. The Comittee has a great concern for the effects of strong winds, particularly at the northeasterly main entrance and emergency doors. Therefore, wind mitigation should be incorporated into the design of the building and /or site which will significantly reduce or eliminate wind impacts. 7. All roof and ground mounted equipment and storage containers should be architecturally screened. 8. Additional landscape should be provided within the ' "courtyards ". 9. Accent canopy trees, shrubs and 9roun1ccvar should be :,,traduced into the main plaza and 0coartyards ". The Cormittee reviewed the alternative of emergency access bisecting the main plaza for access to the south portion of the site; however, neither supported nor rejected the option. ;'gat issue will be reviewed by the Design P.eview Committee as pact of the Master Plan modification on September 22, 1988.. C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee revi „red the project aild Made recoarmen az ons zs follows: 1. The main north /south drive ai.le on Red Oak Street (extension of Spruce Avenue) stall be constructed full width including landscaping on the west side from Red oak Street to the plaza area as approved by the City Engineer and City planner. 2. A lot line adjustment to relocate or eliminate the lot line that crosses the proposed building shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The Parcel Map will be required if Phase II is to be an a separate parcel from the future Phase I11. D. Environmental Assessmant: Parts 1 and 2 of the Initial Study pave een ca_ .s4e and no significant environmental impacts have been determined as a cause of the proposed development. III. FACTS FOR FmINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the Hera an an n ustrial Specific Plan. The building der;gn and site plzer together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliacce with ttie Industrial Specific Plana PLANNING COMMISSION STARF.REPART DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -28.- DAMON DECROli 1ptember 28, 1988 Page 4 IV. RECOMENDA`eION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission issue a gaffve Declaration for aevelOament.Review 88 -18. Res uIT� tted, B Ei B r Cit anne 88 :CW :mlg AttachmEnts: Exhibit ''A - Location Map Exhibit "6" - Site Plan Exhibit " " ,,, Elevationr Exhibit w0" - Landscapes 'Plans wo i i t -: a Dim CO $ ' t 0 �TiT�11Z'tTT EE � � t t t tF - ;W46 �. 13°7 aT4 1 1 g i I It I I .. -I' t JN� z o. �u zap E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1988% TO: Chalmian and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 8578 SANTA FE DEVELOPMENT v s on of acres of an into 14 parcels wit n the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Area (subarea 9) located on the southside of Arrow Route, east and west of Milliken Avenue - (AJON 229- 111 -23). BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map 8578 as shown on Exhibit "B" was initially approved by the Planning Commission on October 24, 1984 for an initial two-year period until October 24, 1986. The second of a possible three one yHar time extensions was granted on October 14, 1987 exUnding the app"val period until October 24, 1988. The applicant is now requesting the third of the possible three one-year extensions. The letter of re(piest (Exhibit "C") is attached for your reference. - RECONWAMI i ION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution approving a final one-year time extension for Parcel Map 8578. The new expiration date would be October 24 1989. Respectfully submitted, � � lk� w Barrye Hanson Senior Civil 'engineer BRH:BY:jmb Attachment ITEM C A dd � �'•. - -err �tt,. �"` �...n Yaw,•, �� r- :e`i`'K',w' �It+��atn Iltli�nlutnt 4;, E. --------_-----_---j L-__------__-_--------_- ^ -L -------_-_` ��*=� ' ^'-'-��_ _-_--- -' CITY OF %ANCHO CUCAMONGA a I MAP &S Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corporation 3230 East Imperial Highway. wits 100 Brea. Califomia 728-21 Adftk 714/993.9000 August 31, 1988 DCA07123 City of Rancho Cucamonga City Engineer's Office 9320 Baseline Road, Suite Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTENTION: Ms. Barbara Krall Re: Parcei Map 8578, Time Extension Santa Fe Land Improvement Company Gentlemen: Parcel Map 8578 expires on October 24, 1988. We are very close to completing the engineering and processing necessary to record.-the fiiai map; however, we will not be prepared to record the map by October 24, 198P. Therefore, we respectfully request an extension of Parcel Map 8578 for one year to October 24, 1989. As agent for Santa Fe Land Improvement Company, we request the City process an extension of Parcel Map 8578 as quickly as possible. Thank you. Sincerely, �r P. S. Martinez Director of DevelopmLnt 27/1908s/6 cc: Dave Gunderr„ an is R !'r s t 11 Williamson and Schmid �� 1988 ILI IJI 17782 Sky Park Boulevard Irvine, CA 92714 CITY OF RANCHO Cut;AmGNGA ENGINEEP.ING DIVISION LA E 7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE M- NCHO CUCAMONGrA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL ,OAP 8578 (APN 229- 111 -23) I. Recitals. (1) Santa Fe Development Cnmpany has V!� -ad an application for the extension of Parcel Map No. 8578 as describes in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, to subject Time Extension request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On October 24, 1984 this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 84122, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Parcel Map No. b578. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. II. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commiseslea e the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: A. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in ,,he Recitals, Part I, of this Resolution are true and correct. B. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including a wrItten report, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: 1. The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and 2. The extension is within the time Limits prescribed by state law and local ordinance; and 3. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expiration would not be consistent 41th the intent of the Development Code. C. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs A and 8 above, this Commission hereby grants Time Extension for: Parcel Map Applicant 8578 Santa Fe Develogwnt Co. 01-5, Expiration October 24 1989 APPROVED ANa ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988. PLANNING C034ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chavqwn ATTEST: —Brad Vu er, Uepuv Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secrstary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that, the foregoing .Resolution was duly and regelarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planniisg Commission rk�ld on the 14th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -Wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: B ss: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ''''1 61 L3�I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT c DATE. September 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -25 LENNON - Ine development of an o ce, manufacturing and warehouse building totaling 29,860 square feet on 1.5 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the south ,,,ide of S(taron Circle, east of Hermosa Avenue - APN: &2? - 261 -23. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION; A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or _ - acan"iwe u area General Industrial) South - Vacant; Proposed multi- terant, Subarea 5 (General Industrial) East - Existinq warehouse building; Subarea 5 (General Indust 1) West - Vacant; rroposea multi- tenant, Subarea 5 (General Industrial) C. Genes 1 Plan Designations: ro ect Site - General 15 ustrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an approximate s ape o 2% from north to south. The site is bounded to the east by the Deer Creek Mood Control Channel while to the north, south and west is vacant land. However, a project for three multi- tenant industrial brildirgs CDR 87 -20) has been approved to the south and west while a single industrial building has been approved to the northwest of the subject parcel'. ITEM D PLANNING C "ISSION STAFF KEPQrtl` OR GS -25 - LSHMON ARCHITECTURE September 28, 1988 Page 2 i E. Park_.._, ilculations: i i Type Square parkin Nun, of Number of of Use Spaces Spaces i Footage Rating I'e mired Provided ffice 1.758 11,250 Afanufzctt:ti-ic�c 13,800 it 00 2g Warehouse 14,310 1 /1000 14 YT. MALYSIS: A. General: This project is to be deve €sued as are an ua r al bul7ding for a sign "Manufacturing co .M.1ny, lie pPtnased use and buitfng design arR consistent With the standards and requirements for Subarea 5. The roosed architectural treatment is consistent with the adjacent approved buildings 'which have tMilized a combination of sandblazt.,d concrete and paint-ad accent stripes. Following issuance Of a begot Declaration va - +he City Planner will issue approval sub?ect to the recmrmnaq,. As Committee. of th« design Review 8• Oesi (Jn Restiew Committees the CorA111'teG (t+kNiel, Tml,tay; ye n rEV ewe � project oil September 8, 1 988 and -- ,=vended approval su6jec+� to the following; 1) 'dent the trash enclosure at the northeast portion of the site be relocated iek order to provide landscape aresrtd the unit. screening 2) The trading door on the west elevation should be to match the adjacent walls. painted 3) The screenwalls around the employee _a:ttio area should he Of a consistent material and color as the adjacent wall. 4) Tall, fast gr"ng landscaping should be added to the planter finger north of the loading area on the west elevation to screen the area from view. 5) The tack -up fire lane on the easterly end of the north elevation should be composed of a turf 'block. t� PLANNING COMISS74OR STAFF REPORT DR 80-26 - LENNON ARCHITECTURE September 28, 1988 Page 3 C. Technical Review Committee:, The project was reviewed and con tionally approve d` rye Technical Review Cor�mittee on September &, 1988, L_ Environmental Assess�c -nt: iarz I and II of the Initial Stuev have een comp a WWa-n-d no significant impacts have be identified. III. REC-MMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission sue T"NegaTTve Declaration through minute action. Resnactfvlly submitted, rad Bul1e City ?i nner BB:CN:vc Ak Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization map Exhibit "B" - Sit -i Plan Exhibit "G" Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Patio and Entrance Dstails Exhibit "E" Elevations �i�i r� RODE i FLO—CO Cf� SITE UTI? IZAT30N�yt.--It -i scxe r.W s mere ro r°OO�urc '/ ii NEI' e it I I �. -- _ D-5 IL I I . �A �m Ell I I 41h4e rorKrl�— irOia hiBKifvTy,— ena rry4kce, priVa:'y Wall o+ d,Vhvftma PHN" Wall am FSM k me Lu rdh �=:*r �on �' CIW OF rrj cuc &N� Tnut OPASION EX'-dW'--2— SCAM, -D-7 fe I A-A Vlim REA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 198E TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT' RESOLUTION OF D-HIAt FGR CO ITFO t 14D NA_ USE PERmai oo -aa - e request for a 143s ter on ona se perm o allow, a combination of specific office and Wholesale rses with{;) the Jersey Business Park, located north of Jersi%v Boulevard and west of Red Oak Avenue - APit: 209 - 142 -19, 20, and 21. As directed by the Planning Commission at the Augu %t 24, 1988 meeting, a. Resolution of Denial has been prepared for Conditional Use Permit 88 -33.. Res ?anner su tted B d Cit P BB:CW•k o Attachments: Resolution of Denial KI RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -33 FOR MASTrS APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC OFFICE 93 WHOLESALE USES LOCATED IN THE JERSEY BUSINESS PARK "I THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT APN: 209- 142 -13, 2t, AND 21 A. Recitals. (i) Barton Development has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit Nu. 88-33 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the Ubject Conditional Use Permit request is referretl to as "the application ". (ii) On the 24th of August, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho. CucamongZt corducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded Bald hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites tor, the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. �. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, -Pt is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referent d public hearing on" August 24, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located in Subarea 8 of the Industrial Specific Plan at 10700 Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 530 feet and lot depth of 510 feet and is presently improved with seven industrial buildings. (b) The request is to consider master approval far: o Administrative and Office o Professional /Design Set -vices o Finapce, Insurance and Real Estate Services o Dry- Cleal)ers o Travel Aijencies o Photograp.'hy Studios I RESOLUTION NO. CONDIT$ONAL USE PERMIT 88-33 Sept °.aber 28, 1988 Page 2 L (c) The regvast is contrary to the purpose and intent of the Conditional Use Permit process which is intended to afford an opportunity for broad public review and evaluati o of site requirements and characteristics, to provide adequate mitigation of ac: adverse impacts, and to ensure that all site development regulations and perf,)MAnce standards are provided in compliance. activities and dto assure Subarea fo r a utransnti nJ areaifrom for General Industrial category located north of this subarea. (e) The proposed uses are considered ancillary; therefore, require Conditional Use Permit review on a case -by -case basis to consider compatibility with iirrounding uses. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) That the proposal is not in accord with the General Pla t, the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposal will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties r improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposal use does not compl!; with the intent of the appli.:able provisi,-ns of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of 'this Resolution. APPROVED Aha ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPSEMBEE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By. p ,a ►ryT1�i'e�' �FiaT"rman ,�i¢ ATTEST: ra h. r_, Secr e aFy RESOLUTION NO. CONOITIONAL.USE PERMIT 88 -33 September 28, 1988 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning - Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foOooing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted -by 1 :the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho,Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission.heid on the 28th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -tn -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: .n crry OF RANCHO CTJCAy.ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1988 TO: Chairmop 6,1 f4embers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad 4,iller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION 0 ;DENIAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-28 PERRY - Teve -ro—pment ot a 5,915- square foot retail FRYTTUIng on 0,52 acres of land within an existing shopping center in 'the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Specific Plan, locatee on the southwest corner of Foothill �ulevard and Malachite Avenue - APN: 206-261-20. I. BACKGROUND On September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission held a c u p M--fi— ' earing v or CUP 88-28 and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Denial for the project as proposed by t;-.e applicant. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recow-nds that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Use Permit 88-28 through adoption W- attac.lied Resolution. R4esvl ly SSWtted,, 'y u /Bra r I City P7 nner BB:BH:js Attachments: Resolution of Denial ITEM RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION r`NYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -28, AND DESIGN RtVIEW THEREOF, FOR A 5,195 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDIIG ADDITION WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CFNTER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MALACHITE AVENUE CORM- NITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT APH: 208 - 261 -20 A. Recitals. (ii Mr. Forrest Perry has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -28 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 28th day. of September 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cu.imonga conducted a duly noticed public hearirfg on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. jhave occurred? All legal prerequisites to the adoption of ',11s Resolution t � B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically 'inds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearirc on Scjtk giber 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, togeth:r with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue with a street frontage of 145 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property, to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of tha-' site consists of a single family residence, the property to the east is In existing office building and the property to the wrest is the existing Perry's Market Center. (c) That the project is inconsistent with design policies set forth in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan with regard to building facade articulation, storefront and window treatment, and building relationship to adjacent residential properties; and ._ C� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -28 - PERRY September 28, 1988 F14ge 2 (d) That the master plan submitted with the application does not adequately address the circulation, parking, and access issues for the parcel to the north of the proposed project; and (e) That the project is inconsistent with the City's goal of upgrading Foothill Boulevard properties and policy of requiring .ompliance with the community design guidolires in puns for expansion. 3. Based upon 'the s0stantial evidence presented to thi.. Ccrimission during the above- re fe,-enced, public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in pa- agrapaa 1 ar:d 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, tFp, objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is 1 . -ated. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be ditrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (-) That the proposed use does not com3)1y •with each 1f t),Ie applicable provisions of the Devel op=nt Code. 4. Based upon the findings and ::ncllisions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereti y denifs t'te appli ^atian. 5. The Secretary is this Commission sh411 certify to the adoption of this Resctution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20 t DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAMCES CUGR4'ONG1 BY • arrY T. McNi c , Ch d J iRan ATTEST: rad Liuller, Sec;� ,pry PLANNiNa, COWISS N Q REsOLIITION NO, CUP 88-28 - PDRY September 28, 198f3 Page S :r I» Brad Buller, Secretary Cucamonga, do hereby cetify the hat ith�in ores ink igps�lu�i n Cw�s d4;Rancho regularly in *.roduead, passed, and adopted by the Pianrt:.. Coaenission f the dnd City of Rancho Cucammonga,, at a regular meeicing of the Paanning Cogs iss on held on the 28th day of Septu�e, 1986} b.Y the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMISSICNERS: NOES: COMMtLICNERS: ABSENT: COMISSIC' RP'S: In DATE: TO: FRMI: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO UVCA_i`,1ONG:4 STAFF REPO RT _ October 5, 1988 Planning Commiissicn /City Council Jrad Buller, City Planner Jeff Gravel, A sistant planner EAVIRINMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERA. PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -OSB I - VU1n4GJ3iri6:t U -MLU!' MI - P request to amend the Land - se p of e enera Nian from park to Very Low Rek�fdential (less than ter, units per acre) for 3.85 acres located en the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road - MN: ICP1 ^691 -11. RELATED FILE: TiRTATIVE TRACT 133359 I. PW -JECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding .Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing Single Family Re_idential, zoned for 'lery Low Re :Odential, (2 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing Single Fa -mily Residential, zoned for Very Low Residential, (2 A -iiling units par acre) East Euisting School, St Etem_ntary School, Zones for Very Low Resi %in -Ma, (2 dwelling t-,Pits per acre liest - Existing Si,,,-",e family 4sidential, zoned. for Very Low Residential, (2 dog ':Ing units per acv -e) B. General Plan DeF :,.rations: Project Site - Park desigraticn, subject to the footnote indicate., at the bottom of the Land Use Map. North Va Low 2esidential, .less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South Vary *U -ew Residential, (less than 2 dwellinf, units per acre) East - its cal West - , ial, (less than 2 duelling units per acr< C. Site Characteristics, 3e is currently vacant, however, t s a aces, o "the "��rk El eme.:tary School on the east side. Surrounding the —st of the site is Single Family C CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPP Za-033 - QUITESSENC£ OEVELOPP'-NT October 5, 1988 Page 2 Residential. The frontage and access to the site is on Sapphire Street. The lot is a flag configuration with a frontage vi; Sapphire Street of 40 feet. In addition, the site has an approved 'tract Map 133594 II. E!4IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Initial Study and reviewed the Environmental ChArklist, Part Ii of the Initial Study, and has found no significant adverso., environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Arrsndment 88R03g. It is anticipated that any i%ue of vehicular traffic impacts may be successfully mitigated at the development project, lever. III. STAFF ANAL *ISIS,. The requested amendment will change toe site's designation from "Park" to "Very Lour Residential." The park's designation location is subject to change according to a footnote illustrEted below the Land Use Plan Map, of the Cane-al Plan. The footnote a3 shown on the General Plan Map indicates: "The sites shown may rut be AOL currently owned nor is the iocation site specific. The depiction of a site '., ..n indication of a projected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City and the School District develop." Furthermore, the Community Services Depart=nt acknowledged iri 2981 to Arlan Welton, tov %Pr owner %3f the site, see Exhibit C, that the City is not iratevestid in the subject location for a par:;. In addition, the City is currently not interested in the site for a park because -f its small size (3.35 acres) and limited access to the site. In conclusion, the Park will rema a a flcatint, designation because a park is needed in the general area of the .: ject site. If the amendment is approved, staff will reposition the designation at the intersection of Sapphire Street and Hillside Road on the General Plan's Land Use Map. This will provide for a park site in the general area without designating a specific site for its location. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: General Plan Amendment 88 -039 will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. Should the Planning Commission determine that the amendment would promote the land uto goals and purpcve of the General Playa, the fn lowing findings may be made for approval A. The subject p.',�per'ty is found to be suitable for the intended land use of the amendmer t. `.Z AV& CITY MUM11L StAFF REPORT (SPA 38-w03B - QUITESSENCE DEVELOPMENT October 5, 1980 Page 3 r. B. "Me intended land use is foUnd to be compatible with the surrounding areas in terms of access, vehicular/pedestrian circulation and Intensity, C. The proposed amendment will not have any adverse environmental i1nPacts that can not bm. mitigatt.— D. The amendment shall be in conformance with the goals ano- objective of the General Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This Item has been advertised as a public hearing newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to -aTT -property owners withi,-4 300 feet of the project site. vr. RECOMENDATION: Staff recormnds t�at the Planning CM I Mission adop eat shed Reso7ution recorriending approval of General Plan Amendment 88-038 to the City council and Issue a Negative Dec ?-.ration, ther6y allowing the designat,10n to change from "Park" to "Very Low Residentiali.'-u Respectfully Abudttpd, Brad Buller City Planner BB:JG:mlg AttaciNments: Exhibit V1 - General Plan Map Exhibit "011 - Site M•.; Exhibit "C" -- letter Resolution 17,3 Ur - A f � FigUre I11-'1 .AND USE PLAN RESIDENTIAL VERY LOW <2 DU'S /AC G: LOW 2.4 DU's /AC LOW - MEDIUM 4- 8DUWAC, MEDIUM 9-14 DU's /Ac 0 MEDIUM -HIGH 94 -24 air's /AC IIIIINIII HIGH 24- 30 oU81AC ED MASTER PLAN REQUIRED COMMERCIAL /OFFICE COMMERCIA L L� COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL CD NEIGHBORHOOD COM:M. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK EM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL M2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPA ;E (� HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL C� OPEN SPACE C! FLOOD CONTROL / UTILITY COF SPECIAL BOULEVARD PUBLIC FACILITIES E /J;H EXISTING SCHOOLS EEI PROPOSED SCHOOLS' �=1 PARKS'IEJUSTM PARKS SHOWN *P) [O CIVIC /CUIViMUNITY Cff V OF RANCHO CUCAt48IIONGA GENERAL PLAN Q. sow tn. w....R...r..�a<+w.k.=wa.sen. roen.,.er a.M•ta. e:ycm+ao�o ,a.71 A rH gio.•enw. a..•�.n.. eero weo w �•r r.aci.a aw us o w uir ... n• sws o.nM awr. rrE , GPA 88 - 088 QUINTESSENCE TITLE: GENERAL PLAN MAP EXHIBIT, A SCALE= HQNr 0, _!l r .xTE11+: Qg.A 88 -83S QUINTESSEPME Td ME: SITE MAP EXHIBIT, SCALE- -MY}iE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �'� „�'' y g.,.r PbiPLpi). Se6ioaur c j �= Iltthnr �. Midaa Jon D. Kkeh % O Jan" C. rraat P dombe C � .,v June - 17.1961 isn Arian Walton 56 -5 g,pphire Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 ee3r Mr. Walton: This letter is sent confirming disevasioP4 between yo%srself and tiffs writer regarding Gote�ltitl location of a par,& upon ydur property at and adjacent to 5675 Sapphire in Rancho Cucamonga. While the General Plan shows an ine- icxtion of a park uNan your property. this is merely symbdlie of locaaing it in that "general" area, Upon specific 0te analysis of your property when considering factors of: access, surrounding and directly adjacent land usesI -,and# mitigation to any adver a impacts possibl, created by the introdvcticilt of a park, i`F is felt that the use of your land for a neighborhood, park is untenable. We appreciLts your S"e "ous cooperation and offer to Felp the City in this undertak%c of pfoviding more 'park land for its residents, hour,. ever, we are not considering the purchase of your pa°1Ner?ty toward that end. Again, thank you for your consideration. Cor ially, W IIiam L. Hol ey, Wo-r- a Comm unity i'p ices Q art ant VLH:nm XIBI7 C 9_' �(�5 �FFRCisF3�l' `O v Run,_NciI4cUCA itINGA,CALIF ,ORNIA9173Q �+ (r1A1989e 851 r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION Or THE PLAN`IING COMMISSION OF (HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMdONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING A °:'ROYAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -038 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM PARK TO VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (2 DWELLING UNITS PEP. ACRE) ON 3.85 ACRES ON SHE CAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET, SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) quintessence Development has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 88 -038 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 28, 1988.. the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All lenal prerequisites to the adoption 6- this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. ' This Commission heresy specifically finds that all of thy: facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are trus and correcv. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission. during the: above - referenced public hearing or, "aeptember 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 3.55 er -.s of land, basically a flag covifiguration, located east side of Saponire, south of Hillside Road and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Park, however, ,;:Abject to footnote at bottom of Land Use Map of General Plan; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Very Low Residential (less than 2 drolling units per acr_) and is vacant. The property `.o tee West is designated Very -Low Residential (less than 2 d*elii:ig units per acre) and is developed Single Family Residential,. The property to the east is designated School and is an existing school site. The property to the south is designated Very -Law Residential (le.s than 2 dwelling units p:r acre) and is developed Single Family Homs. 6`7 PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION MO. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -038 Page 2 (c) This amendrent does not conflict witt t a Policies of the General plan and grill not provide for developoent within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related develo,¢xnent; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental tc the adjacent propertie, and would not have a significant impact on the enviornment nor the surrounding properties and that a V3gatiae Declaration be issued. 3. Jased upon the subs�antial evidence Presorted to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this ConvIssion hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding am'q and (b) That the proposed amendment would no, 'have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendmp,,it is in r Wormance with the General Plan. 4 This Coaasissidn hereby finds and certifies that the project nas been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1370 and, recormends Certification of a Negative Declaration to the City Countil. 5. Based upon the findings and coAclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 ab'We_ this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 55850 o 65855 of 142 California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rar.ho Cucamonga hereby approves on the day of 1588, General -Plan Amendment No. 6. The ,secretary to this Cc,-mission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution 6_q q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -038 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA0ONGA BY _ arry t e , a� z:an ATTEST: --VaTTU717er, ecru I, Brad Buller, Secretarrt of fy the Pl the nfaregoingi Re ®lutionC a duly rand Cucamonga, t hereby passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of th% regularly introduced, City of Rancho Cucamonga, atS regular �e �Comaission held on the _ day�f IB� bythOTla ingvate�towit; KIES ComMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONjRS: ARgrNTt CoMmISSIONERS: Gf ;a i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1VIORANDI1 , Date: September 28 1988 , To: Chairman and Memtet=- of Planairg Commission. From: Jeff Gravel, Assistant P1an.ier7 Subject: Letter of conce a regarding CPA 88 -038 1 received a letter on Monday, Sep;`ember 26, 1968 regarding water pressure in the area of the subject site. The letter was received after the agenda aacWs were cow lete.a anti therefore it is forwarded to you at this time. JG:js 1/ u September 23, 79C.x City of Rancho Cucamonga c -a , { Planning Div%siorr, Unit B 9340 Base Dine.Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Sirs; reference is made to yoNr naticO OF a public hearing, dated 2�ptember 16, 7988, concerning on Environmental Assessment onO General Plan Amendment, No. ee -03B - Quintessence DevelopmQtst, We residents of Orchard and Vinmar Streets, rho are located ,just north of the 3.79 acres on Sapphire Street now being considered for amendment from park to very low residential, strongly object to such an amendment • -- UNLESS the Cucamonga County Water Distria^ can assure you that t!2d water to be supplied to these new homes will come from a source other than the line nr',w supplying Vinmar, a small section of Sapphire, and Orchard Street eest of Sapphire. This area has been identifiea as having extremely low water pressure. This extremaly low water pressu('b has been the subje(,t of several recent discussions by the undersigned re ^dents with BOTH the Cucamonga County Water Hoard and with the City .Council of Rancho Cucamonga. The undersigneJ residents will not object to the above amendment to the General Plan Map if the Cucamonga County hater District FIRST ensures you, in writing, that the water will be supplied from Q source other than Vat which row serves the residents of Orchard and Vinmar Streets. ��""�rnette Po y u{ Donald Heinz T 8326 rchard 5605 Vinmar Dennis Cole Frank Bolonciefer Orchard Street Orchard Street Marc r=re endbIl Hale Orchard Street Orchard Street CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONG.t STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1988 TO: Chairman Tnd Membirs of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner $Y: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AM- ENDMENT ?M. requeVIE ro amena the sera an arrf use ap rom ery Low Density Residential (1 -2 dwalling units per acre) to General Commercial for 57,15+ acres of nand located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway. The Planning Commission will consider Other appropriate General land use categories Neighborhood Commercial and DFfice) - APR: 22C- x41•,08, 11, 12 and 226- 112.03. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT_ AND BTIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ft -4tr mtm sv. w -vj - urrt �kA - A request to amerli tree wan a Specific ZF ap rom "VL" (Vera Low Der ;sity Residential, 1 -2 dwelling units, per acre) to "GC' ( General Commercial) fbr 5 7.5+ acres of land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -16 Freeway; and from "FC' (Fieewby Commercial) to "GC" SGererai Commercial) for 6<a acres of land at the westerly juration of Cherry Avenue and the 1 -15 Freeway. The Plann ng Commission will consider the other appropriate r¢iwanda Specific Plan land use categories (Ness.,00rhood Commercial, Convenience Commercial, Freeway- Related Commercial, Office /Professional) - APN: 226 - 121 -08= 11, 12, and 226- 112 -03. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Z fin North Undeveloped; 11unter's Ridge Specific Plan desfgration R -1 4500 (City or Fontana). South 1 -15 Freeway. East - I-15 Freeway. West - Undeveloped; Flood Control Corridor; Etiwanda Specific Plan Designation 009en Space ZO, '41. ITEti Rj PLANNI!:G CMISSICH STAFF REPORT GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX Septembe 98, 1988 Page 2 11 $, General Plan Desi nations: Project Site - Very Low Residential (Tess than 2 dwelling units NOrthcre) Very CL�eResidential Bess than 2 dwelling units per acre) (Rancho Cucamonga General Plar). South - Freeway. East - Freeway. West Flood Controljittilty Corridor. . C. Site Characteristics, The site is currently y304nt and the lan s"d 'To -ies grtici a 7Y' to the southwest at about 4 %. Portions Of the site are currently cultivated with vineyards, The Hawker Crawford Channel, partially improved, traverses the site carrying storm water fma the north to San Sevaine Spreading Basins. Surrounding lard uses are primaily vacant grass lands. To the west exists the San Sevaine Spreading Basins 41ch ire used for storm water uetentior+ and ground water recharge. The property to the north is in the City of Fontana and it is zoned for r* °esidential use and a housing project (Hunter's Wjge) has recently beer, approved. II. ENVIRONME'gTAL ASSESSNEUT: Staff" has reviewed the Initial Study, ar "an comp e e e Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found np si4hlfitant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of xhe 'roposed General: *Ian ftndment and Etiwanda Specific Plan °idment 88 -05, III, LAND 04 ANALYSIS; 8a.k rounds The existing General Man (GP} (.and Use Desianatian re ec s n he Etiwanda an City's policies to limit residentiAl density Win the d foothill areas. During the development of tha reviewee yeFific Alan (ESP) areas of special significa,ice wcre revirrrec a land use decisions were specifically detevmined. All other p ,:; qencral7y received the Very Low (VL) aesignatdon. Na analysis tins spade on this specific site and therefore YL was determ appropriate ropriate due to the above - mentioned policy. Discu-- on: Analysis of the request shall 7 revvg around the 5T'tBWi'4ig -ssues o'1 A. MrOPrlateness of the existin VL des i nctiAn - 'Fhe si is a rr r angu ar area a an Darr e and or )0 Fiooc� Control Spreading Grounds ;Sant SevcIne Wash the 1-15 Freeway =. Nith the noise and air pallutron from the . eeway and trai!ic on Cherry and 24th, the site tines not lard tself to creating a quirt rural attasphere desired f ,br a 112 acre single family esilential subdivision. The appropriateness sr" the 0xistisg land use and other more intense /0,701-02 0 9 -28 -88 PC Aa2Clda 2, of 5 PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88 -03C - L'NITEX September 28, 1988 Page 3 residential uses in� close proximity to the freeway should therefore be questioned. Partial reduction of the residential designation on the site is questionable due to the narrowness of the site between the freeway and Cherry Avenue. Deletion of residential uses only along the freeway frontage would result in a narrow residential strip along Cherry Avenue. B. Need and viability of commercial uses in the area The applicati—on-Tias provided an economic s u a e area which focuses on the potential for commercial development on the site. The study conclusions indicate the following: 1. The site has excellent locational characteristics because of its freeway access and visibility, its scale (property), and its relative immunity from potentially competitive developments planned to the north of the site. 2. Projection scenarios identify a wir?low od opportunity in 1994 for the development of a 124:,000 square foot neighborhood shopping center anchored by a supermarket and drug store or variety/home imprc !Lment :;tore. 3. An analysis of the potential of a more ambitious community -scale center (up to 50 aclvs) indicates that there will be adequate untapped demand to support such a center.. 4. "o,ected absorption potential for garden office space (two -story with a density of about 17,000 square feet /acre) in the near term is likely to be fairly minimal at one or two acres per year. 5. A shortfall of 900,000 :square feet of retail /service ,categories can be expected within a four mile trade area radius around the site at the horizon population level. Conformance with the General Plan (GP) and Etiwanda Specific an - e zn e. nes Wneral Commercial as a a-n-d use category characterized by a broader range M use ;tivities than any other commercial designation. It includes vocal commercial, community shopping /office complexes, and commercial uses surrounding the regional center. Further, the GP states that in relation to the local commercial type, future commercial activities shall be organized into planned, group concentrations as opposed to activities organized in linear strip commercial fashion. The site in its triangular configuration next to the freeway and bordered by arterial roads provides easy opportunity to concentrate commercial activity. PUNNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 68 -03C - UNITEX September 28, 1988 Page 4 The ESP provides the following objectives for Commei-0 0 .Services: Sec. 3.52.100 Prevent future commercial areas and associated traffic from adversely impacting the character of the community. Sec. 3.52.20 - Prevent future commercial areas and associated traffic from adversely impacting the established core, including Etiwanda, and Victoria Avenues. Sec. 3.52.300 - Provide future shopping and other commercial facilities to adequately serve Etiwanda residents' every day needs with minimum disruption of the quality of the residential environment. Sec. 3.52.400 - Where appropriate and feasible without undue disruption of residential areas, provide the commercial facilities to serve the community as a whole. The location of the site on the periphery of the Etiwanda community is ideal to satisfy the above objectives. D. Traffic and air qualily im lications of the land use change - Me Engineering ser •port has determmEi'neo t.,at� roadway geometries around ure site w„l accommodate a Commercial designation for the site. This determination is tho result of review of the applicant — submitted traffic study and the recently completed design work for the designation of Cherry Avenue as a major arterial street to accommodate the Hunter's Ridge development in Fontana. The access control for a commercial development will be provided by the addition of landscaped median islands in 24th Street, the Loop Road and Cherry Avenue. Recognizing thzt a major part of the area's air qualify concerns relate to motor vehicle emissions, the applicant has provided an analyr,is based on the traffic forecasts of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report MR). The traffic study indicates that there will be fewer combined trips for the total proposed project area than listed in the EIR.. This is the result of significa�itiy higher estimates in the EIR than the recent traffic &aal M s has identified. The conclusion is that since the trips for the area have been reduced, air quality is not significantly changed from when the EIP r.s provided and therefore the original EIP. is adequate for this area. #7 - t-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 86 -03C - UNITEX' September 28, 1988 Page 5 E. Consideration of alternative Land uses - Other potential commerc�a y re a e esTgna ohs inc u e the following; 1. GP - Neighborhood Cotmic-r--;al ESP - Neighborhood Commercial; Freeway - Related Services; Convenience Commercial These categories include shopping centers and convenience commercial clusters that provide essential retail goods and services to residents or occupants in the immediate area. The ESP Further defines the Neighborhood Commercial as meeting the needs of neighborhoods with a total population of 8,000 to 10,000 residents and that the primary use within the center should be a supermarket ranging from 30,000 to 100,000 square feet. Additional recammendations include that the site should be easily accessible by bicycle or foov, neighborhood centers should be not closer than one mile t another, and their location should not encourage vehicular . affic in established residential areas or on Etiwanda Avenue. Freeway- Related Services designation is intended to serve both local and through traffic residents. A typical facility would include a service station, fast food and other businesses which desire freeway exposure within a neighborhood center. This site would be able to satisfy the location criteria, for both uses, but at 64 acres only a portion of the site should be considered for neighborhood commercial activities. Convenience Commercial establishments are small, localized retail and /or service businesses thPt provide goods and merchandise to the immediate surt,,unding land uses. Convenience facilities primary function is to provide a convenient place to buy groceries, but eating and drinking establishments, food and beverage sates, limited personal, medical, and retail sales may also be included. Sites should be about 2 -3 acres in size and within convenient walking distance or bike ride from the intended users. Again, due to the large size of the site, only a portion of the properties in question should be alternatively considered for this designation. 2. GP - Office ESP - Offices The GP and ESP discourage the proliferation of individual isolated offices. Instead, these designations encourage t dejeiopment clusters where office uses and support commercial makeiethe can tee an4ac eptable office site sfrom azland fuse perspective. The limited office demand in the orea, however, would raise viability concerns for this site now and in the +iq foreseeable future,!�— PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88 -03C - UNITEv September 28, 1988 Page S 3. ESP - Master Plan The ESP allows for the establishment of Master Plan areas. Because of the size of tie site and the economic analysis indicating development, potential at various times in the future, staff believes ft would be appropriate to consider a master plan designation. This woulu result in the requirement of an approved master p'-an, with a phasing program, prior to any development taking place. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based upon the conclusions listed above, staff believes a anning Commission can make the following findings regarding this application. 1. The property is suitable for the uses peniitted in the proposed land designation and Aistrict in terms of access, as determined by the Engineering Section's analysis of the traffic study and proposed area roadway improvements; size, as re0lected by smaller area requirements For potential alternative,.-'stmercial designations; ant ?- ,oepatibility with existing land rise n the surrounding area as evidenced by generar lack of 0veiop;,ent and compatibility with bordering arterial roads and freeway; and 2. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Environmental Study; and 3. The proposed _ amendments are in ccnfomance with the GP and ESP as evidenced by the ability of the ' proposed land use designations to satisfy the commercial policies and objectives of the GP and ESP; and 4. That a plaster Plan designation is needed to erasure the proper coordination of a phased development of the site. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The 0 a y Report newsnauer, the property posted, and notices sent to at property owner <, kithin 300 feet of the project site. 11p -G 14M PLANNING CGwISSION STAFF" REPORT GPA 83-030 UNITEX- September 28 1988 Page 7 VI. RECOMMENGATIOU: It is recotcmended that the Planning Commission recommen �o 'the City Council the approval of General Plan Amendment No, 88 -03C and Ftiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No.. 88 -05 with a Master Plan designation by the adoption of the attached draft Resolutions. Re c ully tt d% d Bu r Cit nner B3:AW:ko itttachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Location Maps Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C� Development District (ESP) Amendment Map Exhibit D Hunters Ridge Plan Draft Resolution GPA 88 -03C 4 Draft Resolution ESPA 88 -05 4 I f f • SU MM VEM LOW aawjvAc LOW 2.4WWAC LOW- IY,Df{JA/ 4•i017wt4 i=ce MEDREM i•N OIla'PC L.T! MEOEJM -MIGN wacO we ® MM U- 30WWr0 7 � r anw. PUKM R M EXOSrM SC11O" PPpRopom e.-m 8' M-1 cNialcommovy ITAN.T. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: "Am . SCALE: .!P "v r • UJ � rl/ w 0 NS CITY OF s RANCHO CUCAMONGA O r`s n / o 0 P: F- $ > 0 •��3 N bs e� a tW 1 4 t �t HIM ux W s }.. Z � anti z w i CL Q+ > t i.L.i n N p pOfN V1 ri Nip g;f O s m A g W m a ON POP i OhW MM hMn no m W W Vf.N e'i @(Ny NiII ei: �O {�. tR'10t0'Ih 0�1Or7N(�nQNQy �-1��7 ahfOel- Neh"1Oapne}DVf N `r g st O Yi N VJ O O V7 ( 1 ui 4 o C� 4 i 1q°+ q 9 o wo0Fp ,3 r1h A. d fV 7a I�:iOMi'1 V10O i i 4400M at N M ri d'MN M M RR P7 RR N! O.aN 4 N4NC1Otp ei VJ MN1�= �[V.r",mq� N OtlSOqq ONei V7 •'/�ON�O ViM000:1��i0 affil i i 09 R Q m N N M W@ 7 h �` N `4• R h V e V1 m T.NV1Nxi��JXVi VI ?. G1 Li NSLy m CITY OF ITEM: _'SPA 88-03C & tESPA 88 -05 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISIO Y, a -l0 P.YuvimT ,P. "co r . BM LEON LtES)OENTiAL t OF 0!f NLrr ACRES RURAL PESlDEl6t{AL [] RB•30000 24 25.6 ATE' RESIDEN17AL. E E4T RE'10000 I 26 8.5 I FAWE.Y RESM&MAL [3 � RL1 -7204 273 79.8 � (l1 -5omO 7CO 139.9 RI-45M 438 71.5 ARLTI MALY RESM MTIAL r M -2500 (TOWWOUSE) 360 23.1 Q R3 -1800 (APARTMEMPS) 230 10.8 SUB -TOTAL 2.121 359.2 INO@�- RESIDEN;�, COMMERCIAL, (C) ' [] FWOO COWADMIAL 5.5 PUMUC (P) PAW 20.1 0 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 10.0 OPEN (0) p BVMOVE9 21.5 Q UN7AMOVED 117.4 STREET 0 7lwx 93.9 SUS -TOTAL 209.4 YOTAL 567.6 PL&4W$0 Urdr AMA DATA KANNNO � — A/A6�LETTEN Rt 4EDD —Z0NM JMTRar 4&4 AC —NET ACM 262 DU,YA264UN Pvwm7ED DWELLLV6.ma, ■+�.�nwr.�srss wa.r..� �ae�neanrr.; am..ariauua. ropy 9. jug 9 F'MSBTK PREIMM FOR THE WY OF FONtANA oa *�asraaswt+wuroe d-a �, i�°°� •LTA iRKt M •7MIT.l4M \IgOR AL. hnY °L.R4A {AMO�7MTi YG Imo' OF RANCHO CUCAMONG"Al PLAITING DIVISION,Y i-, N V RTIH ITEM GPA 88 -03C & E ;pA 88-05 TITLE: Hunter's Ridge Plan EXHIEW: �"D" SCALE: - -- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C", ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03C, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAR LAND USE MAP FROM VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 57.5+ ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND THE I -15 FREEWAY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 226- 121 -08, 11, AND 12. A. Recitals. (i) Unitex has filed an application on behalf of INTER Corporation for approval of General Plan Amendment No. 88 -03C as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amer ant is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 28, 1988, the Planning Commission .f t" r cy c7 Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pubic hearing on the applicdtion. ('ii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Reso'tution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: l This a i S iP hereby h1 t the forth in the A its art A, of is Resolution true and 2. Based upon substantial eiridence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 57.5 acres of land, basically a narrow triangular - configuration, located on the south side of 24th Street, between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway and is presently 1JVLU; and undeveloped, Said property is currently designated as Very Low Residential designated Veryb Low "VL' he " (Ranchor ucaogaeGeneral P an)handsis3 undeveloped. The property to the west is designated rreod control /Utility Corridor and is undeveloped. The property to the east and south is designated Freeway and is developed with 1 -15 Freeway. RESOLUTION NO. UNITEX - GPA 88 -03C September 28, 1988 Page 2 (c) 'This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Elements; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration he issued, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings facts of set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is suitable for the u &es permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area: and (b) That the proposed amendment would net have significant impacts an the environment., -,or the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Wality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65859 to 65855 of the .California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby rec =ends approval on the 28th day of September, 1988, General Plan Amendment No. 88e03C. 6. The Secreta.y to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RESOLUTION N0. UNITEX VA 88 -03G September 28, 1988 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSI3N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: I� arry T. UtNiel, a rman kl ATTEST: — ra u .er, cre ry I, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho I Cucamonga, do hercby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and I regularly introduced, passe; and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the'Planning omission held L on the 28th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. Ar A gmurIom OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 11HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL.,"4RNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL C ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLM AMENDMENT 88 -05, TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM "VL" (VERY LOW DENSI-i-,2ESIDENTIAL (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO "GC" GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 57.5+ ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SpUTH OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND THE 1 -15 FREEWAY; AND FROM "FC" (FREEWAY COMMERCIAL) TO "GC" (GENERAL COMiMERCIAL) FOR 6.5 ACRES OF LAND AT THE WESTERLY CONJUNCTION OF CHERRY AVENUE AND THE 1 -15 FREEWAY, RANCHO CULAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MiAXE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 22;- 121 -08, 11, 12 Atu'g 226- 112 -03. A. Recitals. (i) Uoitex'has filed an application on behalf of INTER Corporatin for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 88 -05 as described in the titl'. t F this Resolutk' ±i. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwai1da Specific PlCi Amendment is referred tows "the application". (ii) On September 28, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Is Rancho Cucamonga cond3cted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. iiii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolutions have occurred. d. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission heresy specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 64 acres of land, basically a narrow triangular configuration, located on the south side of 24th Street, between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway; and at the westerly conjunction of Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway and is presently undeveloped. Said properties are currently designated as "VL" (Very Low Residents and 'FC" (Freeway C=Aercial); and RESOLUTION NO. UNITEX - ESPA 88 -05 September 28, 19:38 Page 2 designated Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan the R-1 4500 (City of subject Fotana)s and is undeveloped. The property to the west is designated "OP" (Open Space) and is undeveloped flood control area. The property to the east and south is designated Freeway and is developed as I -15 Freeway. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Etiwanda Specific Plan ,::SP) and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and with related 4evplopment; and (d) This amendment does Famote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and e) This amen detrimental to ( the adjacent p operties and would not ha ee a significant ificant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration br issued.. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use'in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (d) That a Master Plan Designation is needed to ensure the proper coordination of a phased development of Lhe site. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 1, 2 and53 above this Comissionnhe hereby resolves nthattpur pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government. Code, that the Planning C^.nmist ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of September, 1988 Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendrmnt No. 88 -05 and with *he incorporation of a Mater Plan Do�signatio. RESOLUTION NO. UNITEX -.ESPA 88 -05 September 28, 198 Page 3 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND .)OPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ..airy T. Wai-el, j, a rman ATTEST'. Brad Buller, Wretafy I, Brad Buller, S, xetary of the Planning Commission` of the City 4 -f Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby c�rtify that the foreac ng Resolution, was, duly and regularly introduced, pe .sed, and adopted by the Plan -ift, :�amnis',on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetng of the Plannio2j Commission meld on the 28th day of September, €988, by the following vote -to -wilt: AYES: COWISSIONERS; NGES: COWI`SSIONERS: ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 28, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, 88- ti3E - WILLrXR -L`VW ! rr,nr - '4 r -ales to amend No site o e an use mart. o the General Plan within the Victoria Groves (west of Milliken on 9.3 acres) .iRi Victoria Vineyards (east of Milliken on 12.9 acres) Villages of the Victoria Community Plan The 'request proposes the switching of Medium High Residerfiial to Neighborhood Camercia, between the two sites. ENVIRONMENTa,i ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY is -A4 MENEW- 88. -LYON CO. - qu nees o amend Me an use deg gna ons; wi+4—.,t5 the Victoria Groves (west of Milliken on 4,3 acres) and Victoria Vineyards (east of Milliken on 12.9 acres) Villages of the Victoria Community Pian.. The request proposes the switching of land uzes designations from Medium High Residential to Neigdtbr,'�.oud Soimercial between the two sites APN:227- 011 -22 -1 -21" 48. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Existing Highland Avenue, future Foothill freeway corridor South - Existing vacant land zoned for Low !Medium Residential, (4«S dwelling units per acres, to the west of Milliken and Medium Residential, (M4 awalling units per acre) to the east 'ast - Existing vacant land zoned for Nedivn Residential, (8 -14 dwelling units per acre),Corrnunity facility West Existing Sang -le Family Residential, Low Medium PLANNING commisSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88 -03E - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY September 28, 1988 Page 2 B. General Plan Designations: Praject.cite - Neighborhood commercial, a 9.3 acre site to the west - Flliken Avenue and Medi :m High Residential 12.9 acres (14 _ fling units per acre) to thdi east. North - Foothill Freeway corridor, just north of Highi -sid Avenue South - Medfin, Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Medium Pesidential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium ° ;idential (8 -14 dwelling units per ecre) C. Site Characteristics The p� -oject sites are currently �racagt and so are v surrounding parcels except to *,he west where single family dwelling units have been developed. ath sites have frontage on Highlend and Milliken Avenues. According to the Victoria Community Plan, both sites will have street right of ways on all sides. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff ha:: completed the Initial Study and rev ewe e n m mntal Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant adyovse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment 88 -03E and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88 -07. It is anticipated mitigated &t the develo menthproject level. may be successfully III. STAFF ANALYSIS: The requested General Plan Amendment will only sw ch an use designations between the two parcels. However, the proposed Neighborhood Commercial site will slightly increase the intensity of the traffic circulation in the area, approximately 22 percent or 1750 trips.. This increase is insignificant to the total number of trips generated by the two sites according to the City's Traffic Engineering Division. Therefore, staff feels that it is unnecessary for the applicant to conduct a trip generation traffic study. The following analysis summary shows potential outcomes of the General Plan Amendment ve ^sus existing land use desie , ions: Medium High Residential Existing 12.9 ac. 11245 dwelling units 14 -24 DU's Requested 9,3 ac. *177 dwelling units per acre *NOTE Assumes an average 19 dwelling units per acre. x P Jo A- PLANNING COM?+LISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88 -03E - WILLIAM LYON CMIPAW. September 28, 1988 Page 3 Neighborhood Commercial )existing 9.3 ac. *93,000 sq. ft. Leasable area Requested 12.9 ac.. *130,000 sq. ft. *NOTE: Assumes approximately 23 percent site coverage As shown in the previous summary analysis the potential residential development will be decreased allowing the commercial leasable area to increase and become more marketable for development, according to the applicant. Furthermore, it is a generally accepted land use principle that a Multiple family Residential lesignation is a less intensive land use than most Commercials In a (,G,r'cending order of land use intensity a Medium Nigh Residential designation would be more: compatible, than commercial, adja ent to a Low Medium Residential designation. On Tuesaay, September 20, 1988, 7,00 p.m. at the Neighborhood Community Center, a community meeting was conducted by staff and attended by representatives of the William Lyon Company. The ati ?ndance was good with approximately c ^A residents present. All residents snake in opposition of the General Plan Amendment. Their main concern was the potential of apartment development being located cltser to their neighborhood. and the problems such as related crime, school impacts and traffic circulation. Residents in Victoria Groves and some in the survounding area have signed a petition containing 472 signatures all of which oppose tine requested amendment (See Exhibit "C "). Following the community meeting, William Lyon Company stated that they are willing to reduce the residential density from Medium Nigh (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Meditn (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). According to the Victoria Community Plan, flexibility in managing the plan allows the land uses to be redesigned by one degree of intensity, whether increased or decreased. Any and all variations shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. Also, the applicant has indicated that the site will be developed with for sale townhouse condominiums and not rental apartments. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: General Plan Amencinent 88 -03E and Victoria CoNUS y an endment 88 -07 will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. Should the Commission determine that the amendment would promote the land use goals and purpose of the General Plan, the Aft following findings may be made for approval: k° *ITY OF RANCID CUCAMONGA ITEM: GPA 66.03E WILLIAM LYON CO. TITLE;SLTE N3QP PLANNIN EYHIBIT- A- SCALE: ALONE ti P €TITIAN -. llt:F7 _ 0-Unal Poor Q11011ty We the reC dents of Victoria Groves --a masrer planned (single family dwelling )community , adamantly oppose the petition by William Lyon Companv for a general plan amendment regarding a change in land use designation; specifically the proposed multi- dwelling apartment site at or near the south- east corner of the intersection of Fairmont Way and Highland Avenue. We cite problems concerning the overcrowding of this residential area, over taxation of city servicbs( fire and shexiff's dept.), traffic congestion, the possibility of increased crime due to the nature of non - permanent residents (non- property owners), •,school overcrowding and a possibility of a depreciation of existing home values in :Bictoria Groves. ' The aforementioned problems already exist in the community. Allowing this proposed amendment for apartment dwellings in a residential neighborhood will already compound the results. 1p NA TE ------- -- ---- ---- nnnoccc --------------- --- ---------- - --- -- 96 5 1 A Odd inn . - - - -.- •----- - - - - -- " Py�. - -. -- - - -- - - - - - -- 9- --------- . Gi..:,I%7 !,n �� / . � /,.. to l.• __--- _- __-- 7E Z Z471t.Ner C /d1Yl/SeF:05 c 7i C171 /1 `3i4 96 z� a � rs r:.. `mot•! -dl b f 27 t _k 06411W 'poor PAGE , PETITION We the residents of Vint�,ria Groves -a master- planned (single family dwelling) community, adamantly oppose the petition by William Lyon company for a general plan amend- ment regarding a change in land use designation; specifically the proposed multi- dwelling apartment site at or near the southeast corner of the intersection of Fairmont Way and Highland Avenue. We cite problems concerning overcrow -�';,g of residential area, over taxation of city services, (fire, and sheriff's department) traffic congestion, possibility of increased crime, due '.co the nature or non- permanent residents, school over- crowding and possijle depreciation of existing home values in Victoria Groves. The aforemention problems already exist in this ANk community. Allowing this proposed amen1went for apartment Ip dwellings in a residential neighborhood will only compound the results. --------------- ^ - -- -- -DDRESS -- --- -- - -- - -- NAME ----------- PHONE# --- - - - - - -- - - °- - - - - -- r -�0 Re.. CAeII 56 _1 t 4, �a 1`7 :, T v Y0 I /701 9- SC�Z- l r 1 OHQ!nal omit, , ~"----------- - - - - -- •_*-- = - - - -- - - -- s' i rQ z' . - - --------- --------------- : ��" � 1 �'> ,�f ( l ill .aJ1 C•'.' i� [ �. � J h ? (J.{ - r 3 ' r f F; ' °tom �• ` ` -- J -.I l A lam, z� i rl 1 s rtP' r ,y # • s' i rQ z' 5b 57 58 �t lorivdqnN poor Oudity PMITION 11 ?ET�ITION !rlwA �Al5Jn q Original Poor C�tAI>fi� We the residents of Victoria Groves -a master Manned lsinyle .family dwelling )community , adamants opaose the petition by William Lyon Company Ear a general plan amendment re;ardir,,: a change in land use designation; specificall) the Proposed multi - dwelling apartment site at or near the south - east corner of the intersection of Fairmont [Jay and Highland 4,enue. We cite pro' .alems concerning the overcrowding of this residential area, over taxation of city services( fire and sheriff's dept.!, traffic congestion, the possibility of increased crime due Lo the nature of non - permanent residents (non - property owners), school overcrowding and a possibility of a depreciation of existing home values in Victoria Groves. The aforementioned problems already exist in the community. Allowing this proposed amendment for apartment dwellings in a residential neighborhood will already compound the res,_ .. tJ . - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- - - - ' ADDRESS___ __ _ _ _ ?HON,:; � • ^ ' � u' 11'11 � r' T -- ----- - -- - -- - _ a�rc�u S• 1 ee .. s� ., LZwL0VA t4 rte= f� it It lr it o �7 / .-S7-k 7, 1w if 19Y ll zfR r' �� _ f li-= -, low 7r47.3 V 20 ?l Z3 .Z4 a1, R7 as W 31 a3, ✓k N- 39 40 Afl y� '93 44: 11! 4 1- �3 �J FEi:TYOti OFST cue f t /py�q Vyd�9 fir✓ NAMfi ...--t-T+ l 11 A I^ i 11 r. � MRAWN AM .I��. , I 11 A I^ i 11 argonal POIDr 40 ma E We the resie'�?nts of Victcria Groves -a mdstet. r :nnr-•: (single family dwPllin, ) ccmmunity adamantly ar.;.osa -he petition by William Lyon Company tor a general plan amendment regarding a chance in land use designation; specif.iral N '-he proposeC multi - dwelling apartment site at or near the zouth- east .orner of the intersection of Fairmont Way and Highland Avenue.. We cite problems concerning the overcrowding oz this residential area, over taxation of city sFrvires( fire and shegiff's dept.), traffic congestion, the possibility of increased crime due to the nature of non - permanent residents (non- property owners), school overcrowding and a po.;sibility of a depreciation of existing home values in Victoria Groves. The aforementioned problems already exist in the community. Allowing this propos_, amendment for apartment, dwellings in a residential neign:)orhood will already compound the res"tc. ------------------------------- Y'- - - ° -- - - ADDRESS -- - - -- - - -- - -- ?Ii� - - b _ _ - __Lq 7- '4aq eop S gw 5 7 1z 13 ( ZG -13413 Iv f g Tz 17 ��ry.c � % j 1 vn� i t d 1 o �Cl1_ o w- �9 .�.t�t. if ✓� 1 /,� � � �.._'��� -g-- '� ��`' PAGE Poor ouatit PETTITIDN - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -H ----------------------- -- ------ - - - --' -- - -- ---- _D•• -•- R^Er55:�_� ` - - ^- -- ___ ^ C-- /Di �-- Y4.1 _ G •> :i4 27 l u -. Zb a-- -� )f , I :,C �, Z� i�rF•f!% i .i t. � ,,�,,,,,,_ � L � s=� 27 - y �,'h L� 7 ��i ?� 29 ---- i -3 e`- t 03 r. ,-� Sf _ Iq 14a _ ✓r t, ,11 "/� yf/ - ',;;�. '11`x, }, � �' fti"�.._•- �--` =' � nq it 5 55 5 All & r� (ol �3 69 b$ 70`, 7/ 7 73 7� 75 for LY -J-----_--- 3 ADDRESS_ - ---------------------- - 777 6 tV I � S Ste. q�_ t [�LaYIi.Sr•'_ f� � /.dam, l i n � � c7_ _ _ . �� .-� �l G 7S s 8 �a l� 83 ,� 8� •, 9 87 7;; 88 aq to e .. . 1-i v / ac o _s19 s, —. Z iG1ol St Ja�,6u� i Ob / Shaw xf /O '41,Z rn+sA +l /6P-77 Pri= 2MONT S7, rX r, 5;z 9 v 947 X44 -'?137 Cr 4e� -137 3a.7 XL -5-eo-77 'v- 9rfl ?r F -7`ia j h We the residents of Victoria Groves -a master planned (single family dwelling )community , adamantly oupose the petition by William Lyon Company for a general plan amendment regarding a change: in land use designation; specifically the proposed multi - dwelling apartment site at or near the south- east corner of the intersection of Fairmont Way and Highland Avenue. We cite problems concerning the overcrowding of this residential area, over taxation of city services( fire and shegiff*s d pt.), traffic congestion, the possibility of increased crime due to the nature of Aon- permaszent residents (non - property owners), school Overcrowding and a possibility of a deoreciation of existing home values inrvictoria Groves. The aforementioned problems already exist in the community. Allowing this proposed amendment for apartment dwellings in a residential neighborhood will already COMPLIzInd the results, _ ^_-------------- NAME S5 - - -- - - - - - -- _--- __ - PRONE# 1. 3. 5. N 3 dqd �3� u � %tom �. . qR J °$ 9� 96 R7 48 PETITION ��a$���$� to { 6 7" ` Pif . , f , -" --------- r - ------ -- - -- -- _ l , 6� n ��J E c i i is KA We the residents of (single family dwelling ictoria Groves -a master planned 9 )community , adamantly o Petition by William Lyon cam an AA °5e t}:e regarding Company for a general g a change in 1e_nd use des( Plan ,,Ily tent Proposed multi-dwelling designation; specific•-,,tly t!�e g partment site at ar near the south- east corner of the intersection of F<;Itmont Way and Highland Avenue, We cite problems concerning the overcrowding residential area, over of this taxation of cit she4iff's dept.), traffic coigestion Y sQrvxe2s( fire and increased crime due • the possibility of to the nature of non - permanent resident: (non - property ownex.), school Overcrowding Of a depreciation of existing and a possibility <3 home values in Victoria Groves, The aforementioned problems already exist community. Allowing this proposed am, ti7 in the e it far apartment the xcsults, dwellings in a residential neighbrrhood will already compound ----------------- - -- - _ -- 7 qcG NAAf£ "m�� -� •- _ _ s PETITION We the residents of Victoria Groves -a master planned (single family dwelling )community adamanciy �•, PFtition by William Lyon Company the regarning a for a genera— 1� amendment change in lard use designation; sper_i'ically the proposed multi - dwelling apartment site at or near the south- east corner of the intersection of Fairmont Way and Highland Avenue, We cite problems concerning the overcrowding of this residential area, over taxation of city services( fire and sheriff's dept.), traffic congestion, the possibility of increased crime due to the nature of non- permanent residents (non - property owners), school overcroudin and a Of s depreciation of existr•,, home _ g Possibility values in Victoria Groves. The aforementioned problems already exist in the community. Allowing this prOpc ed amendment, for apartment uVe dings in a residential ne'chborhood will already ccapound t:,c result,. ---- -- - - - - -- —__- :J JT K -& 1 7 /I2A. f 'IcsA ww a p • � - LEI j io1% ---------------- ADDRESS--- c"`4q- --- - - - - -- 1 =io7�' ---- - --•-- DRESS_ -___, �• 2.0 9i�ivt �i4— r- -�9��- 10 z� — 44. - 22 1 a 6, a7 140 ? l � - % D_[, - IOQz7 n1G�, as'icr Si- R.e- 9 y - /7QZ 3Q _ /1'9115 _yv`°` ^�R,�L �T Je.c. 9 q G,rsa 37 ANEUA �� logzti� ottrq �T 3 39 :31 tD ° 6� 7 /I2A. f 'IcsA ww a p • � 1 =io7�' �• 2.0 9i�ivt �i4— r- -�9��- 9914 %/z-r z� — I W ., PETITION --- - - - --- -__ 4� g7 gig cq 3DD&ES ------------ --------------- - - -- - - -- f=56 G 5 tt tt �t a 41 F too 101 107 l08 �41�t 5 4914115;--1 4/91z� Z d Z s lr0 III a 113 !.� i0 93 J%33 I- A4 g��-3a.a e�5 1. a� -- Z ,9 t I (,I -- - - - - ._ PST. ITl^ oN '04&-nd Poor Quality :. AME 5. �•1, C lc, ----------------------------------- ADD$ESS PHONE; _�LaY2 _�`, 2 A ►� ry f We the residents of !'' ictoria Groves -a master planned (single � family dwelling )community , adamantly oppose the petition by William Lyon Company for III a general plan amendment regarding a change in land use designation; specifically the proposed multi- dwelling apartment site at or near the south- east corner of the intersection of Fairmont Avenue, Way and Highland We cite problems concerning the avererowding of this resident ial j area, over to ation of city services( fire and sheriff's dept.), traffic congestion, the possibility of increased crime due to the nature of non - permanent_ residents (non - property owners), school overcrowding and a possibility of a depreciation of existing home values in Victoria Groves. The aforementioned problems already exist in the community. Allowing this proposed amendment for apartment dwellings in a residential neighborhood will already compound :c results. - -- - - -- :. AME 5. �•1, C lc, ----------------------------------- ADD$ESS PHONE; _�LaY2 _�`, 2 A ►� ry f PETMON NbUE__c:1wc.�_-=-- +--- BDDRE�.� ---- ----- .._a_ -�_ - - - -_ -- --- - - - - - -- ao, _ C f:►2. ' ; ti��T 1(. hu7.f ',,n, • -` = „ ;. r ,Y aai t' •+ • ?! � •1Pp� {,L i�1 ��+i ' . ' v.s ILI �. , _ 50 31 3.� � .:� +r � / 'C�'_1_'r'I .. ��,t � :_ L <tf! �.irr��`• [� _ f f D %��%z.� .. , ,l �'” `� / ../ �T- � �'. •rte f�J.7'ts�tt4�U Cj.%i F � [: tj, ,. 'i;. •y Y "_'T1r /. .f l!�' .Cw- • j I �•1iG.i , s7 � �5e•�. `' TT Y.` //� _ 7�K 11. T' •��.CN. •T_ :� 3. �i t' 'Z - (1/5 , / 4 1 J C l; • 'e- _ PLTITICN We the residents of 7' ictoria Groves-a master planned (single family dwelling )community , adamantlr�OSe the petition by William Lyon Company Eor a general plan amendment regarding a change in 2.aad use designation; specificall% the Proposed multi - dwelling apartment ::ite at or near the s' th- east corner rf the intersection. of Fairmont Way and Highland ou Avenue. We cite problems concerning he overcrowding of this residential area, over taxation she of city services( fire and iff's dept•), traffic congestion, the possibility of increased crime dupe to the nature of non- permanent residents (non - property owners), school overcrowding and a possibility of a depreciation of existing home values in Victoria Groves. The aforementioned problems already, exist in the community. Allowing this proposed amendment for apartment dwellings in a residential neighborhood will already compound the results. ----- - - - - -- NAME - - --- annor�� -- 71 J E -- - -- -- _ - . _ -------- -T pay_ _- - -_ -- - - - -- - - - - -- al. aa. a3 GW as. Q1.. 20 K] -- ��_ a4-: i t T F x I 110 7,13 +�SE4T gGJ 1 Suite Up 10140 rmneregco renter Drive H.ivrhn Utimi moga.G191130.5832 (7 14) 1144 798H 1.Hgt1 127 '1, { ASnlmharyol UM VW.-,tr-rn4SuWn9Sof Arizona rd D Whom I'. May CencernP I recently purchased a home in the victoria tract Jbf your city. Before I bought my hone, I spent a full year looking at homes and areas in which to raise my famil)t. I had previously live in.Rialto which was experiencing an upswing in crime and I despera:ly needed to find a family orientated neigi-bc,choud which also refl =tea pride of ownership. when I found the victoria tract I was very phrased - with the of planning the city had dic. Because I am a cautious. uiyer�fl alled the city to inquire z5out the city plans for the property south of Highland Ave. betwee=n Fi.11iken W. Fairmont. My final decision to buy at Victoria was based on the fact that no m.u1.ty family or apartment dwellings Were to be built on this site. I have racently learned that the William LI on Co. has requested a chanee Of i:heir original plan for low connercial to a large apartment complex. If this change should be approved we would all suffer from its ad k effects. The Proximity or apartments to my how and the over crowding of t:, — anentaty school is not something I had planned on. We would all feel the effect of increased traffic as well as ove- crowding of our park. I have lived in neighborhoods :;Ath apartment complexes suT6Tounding it and have never seen these areas have a pagitive growth effect or even rem-in the same. I intend to make Victoria my permanent home and hope that ycu will consider my concerns with the William Lyon proposal. Pleasa keep this area zoned as it is 4- low =tmerical. Sincerely, Nancy P. Rogo 11024 Shaw St. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 D CITY Cf G? _. r_�� oN1 SFp �2 0 1282 8177 � ! 7igygi +,�e�1��2tit�t3l�►�dfi' :, K ` Z- M✓flG�SGtlr:g 'iif�' i�3 '= .� "�;+c.�;�sy'.� f �t7 tZa-L COQlaa�LM Wo Aj 14 ILMO 4A, s �ivr�` s jj \ t Yc t4t(A,ck Ebw p \ f ��Qa�tsss`�� Oka V,. IL acl "'��n; 5 �j tl2a n.c.. ii � klttil t f t f C Poor n uty S trt�7 j `�l7C�I p 0'e 3 car o tto c ecc MAr. v�p � S 198 qy ,l I v 0" "A i e Dear Mayor Stout, i M y husband and I have been residents of Rancho Cucamonga for more then 7 years, We moved into the Victoria Groves Community for specific reasons anj now we find our interests are in jeopardy. We are strongly opposed to the proposed zoning change located on the south -east corner of Highland and Fairmont from low — volume commercial to high density apartments. If these apartments are allowed to be constructed the traffic will increase tremendously. The proposed proximity of this complex is within our school boundries and will further endanger the children who walk to and from school as traffic is already high in this community, we do not desire or need this extra burden. Right now over 95% of our children walk to school and an apartment complex will bring in several hundred more cars and a commercial site will not. We chose this community as the school is located within walking distance for our children with little traffic to contend with from our location but there are many more children who must cross-Fairmont and walk longer distances, it's these children whom i "m concerned .for. Let's stop a disaster before it happens. Our choice to stay in this city and live in this community was also based on living within single family homes only. The density of this community is 1iigh already apartments would only add to the problem. I do not desire to live near apartments, this is transit housing and for this reason people do not tend to take care of -he properties within and surrounding their apartments as they do not have a financial investment at risk. These apartments woulsi he surrounded by single family homes, would you pay $180,000.00 for a home to look out window with a view of an apartment complex? No, I can not imagineur anyc a making such a ahojes. NOW those of us that already live here and were expecting a small commercial site may now not have that choice. Believe me we would not have chosen to live near apartments, that is why ae chokes this location and not Terra Vista. Mayor Stout,we have sevz _j apartment complers already within the surrounding :area. Terra Vista has several, the are more behind Lucky Market with more being built there as I write this letter. Why should we be forced to have them constructed within Victoria Groves? This is a single family home community and thats why we as homeowners chose to invest ,here. There are many rersons we oppose would take an extremely Lengthy tr, butzll''minsureanen and it why we are asking for yours, the city council and the yplanning sdept. support on this issue. We will be attending the meeting sponsored by William Lyon and Hughes Development on the 20th of Sept, and the council meeting on the 28th. We hope to hear from you at these meetings with you supporting those of us in Victoria Groves. Respectfully,. Mr. and Mrs. John Fdastoa CITY OF RANCHO CUCAVIONCA ADVAMSTR• ilCN 9/18/88 SEP 191988 ho c.c. Planning Dept. 1 Brad Buller`g!ffiIu��13 4 6 Homorable Citr Council Dated September 21, I986 a' Brad B uller, r ;t., From, 7 Planner; Dennis S ' Cato Johnson tout, Mayer; Honorable Cx.tY council I a° oFAosed to the commerllilcen, e allowd apartment site at end cial Please designation. corner to r southwest that the etain its currentccrner of Highland Yon Comhave has nelghborhod tatives have ProAoscd I85 advised Lnits .t per y atingle adults hotearh yo Coi.any rentalacre site. Their County. Th Cnfortunately, ttieiapArximat,ly thirty represen- to circumstances r date" X three thousare geared live in a 4 which gathered at nd dollars LYan Coma tenants 0o square foot rental forte a sin I projects built will C Company will ental siw8 a adult at that i2t in Orange people whow wish not iniL a adumply 4010 a incom come by single_f to live nist in this Y homes with a neighborharacti.enaYro Prospective provided AAsrtmen; school. and traffic will introduce elementary Will increase,a new set problems school Y school. The addeF -O Of the will iO3 o Victoria Goves. Criee playgrou' compromise the current the park at an ahead use of that Park as hetschool's ei', entered MY husband Cid Park January of this Year, archasa went because Year We felt confident Victoria homes, Mediu'It is - located is a that our home es community in the charact densitye$ artmea prime Ito residential area q was Single-family invest to refuse er of pony s re sin Mower r 1 vet Lyon Com r Shbarhood and Groves Will g family Quest for a ;;one property values. 'y li'elY change change. i urge you Catalina M. Johnson 7053 Chicago Ct. Alta Lama, CA 91741 7- K7 ?3 s ?FP tl.iQr� TO = 6RAf� t3Ut..t�r Ci *zyt PChtvNe'2 Ot'rvNts SIc�uT, M�NO2 lfiDn 72A�6C CAT? COWNc{t_ t AMA WRInNfu TO C.ET �/t7c� MCNt? W SAT 1 I �1 ©r'Pc�SZ =A TO A FROFPD55en Z00JI JG C46UO66 R'r ,,-te SauTr�wes-t CORNeA OF PhC- Aga Pn1Li.tKa,v) rn-j T Ave V tcTZXto ,GROVeFs "W�ttNG 1-#W PROMAT4 Wfis. n Fpt2 CoMm, gcrgs_ nsvettspino-r', W(LLIA t L.VoN cu• t1�6tf v�- tx�1»E'r�F SeWK M C*ANGE t`t` T.oAtwr. oe =stG— NA no,N To mE VAI- WQ4 DeNs '+mil R Es(Oeiu17.KL TAtg2c -fay AL[ ac7rNCe ccn�sil2U&r?onx OF 18 5 ReNT,A-L ffPPAi L*jTs cn) 9.3 ACRE—. , THE GNITS 1/:OLtp 6E 5eiA,* L 15ivO1d5 cre OiVF ' AWO Two BEDR=Cl to P Tl{rS (S NCT' RCCEPi7R$(:E fia The - FOLLOWWr. Rt'"Xi50NG . t� T�iE LkA( -E tNtRft-ASE IN PopoL ro" WrLL pull- A FOAT1fcA --Tw ,N cDN oUJt Re . r K op-Nt ArN4 ALRt"xtD,t CAC"eO w z -TOR(A aROVeS SCHoO L . t v [/ P a Z/3 'zi Rc7v' FtL U,101TS ESPEC4Atd.4 T E SMAU010 AewtO Loo -.>Z GOe_ Gev(TS PA af10560 t WILL fVTVZ1- 01USAVOA4f TWs wru. CA-06E AN WCA(tSE 1a I, CRlri7(=- LLFVE?S, NWP-r PROPER-74 vALUCS ,4N7 DFrmA 77tE RNC5 Cek-h OF 00A NS/6 80AM 00 eF Oswna�- cact�.aP1� �(evG LE Fi1•+n1 Lw ttt�m�. S) TRA4;F(t (.�s tN 7l¢E AREA W(LL WCltMf6e, �l v(c� -aR1q c�2o�� PA(iK wry s�cam�' ovL�ecRo��, 5� i�t� R� ttvN(?rZsrr� aF f},PARTsafC*u�+ f+��OR GI tNG BU(L7� A, LONG rote h}agr+ sloe OF wr-t{cf ,eTLUmM!J ;4Auet' A,vo MILUK@r 04\)e'S, Atri /A34 m cJ` E uN X73 CC?c)c.o c.°ktiJS� fa+'+ f1'PI4RTn26� 6LtTt . T}1E B07-mm LINE 15 l:.LfoN co Oto \)clf- PL• -�) THE Use OF nfE St7B WELL. +ejO Now AS rcv 6-AEI -N AtZEZ lri b LMS AT The eXPSNSE of cv.0 (-�E`� �S77t$C- tSftEn r�1�ifBo�2 CtGt.� . oc.�.2 NE:(L —" eo ?•ttt�CD0 L p&t� , OE5(6cuc —'c3 W cTM CLrR�7'i-" Gi-PAclrtES . A Ltaw(+J6 TF¢E ZzwE Ca�A+vGE W c U. AINk Cfic`SE tRr�CPr}►L�3GE Osiwlf�Gc . 18�, rr W'7 mu �n�aG�soRs r44u� �st6n1c�0 q F ?JON SrrMA)Ca OU2 AIOA ItA, aP c on i t RsFc ° '• you p-" nd�v Tnr-- Ham' IV`t OPP�StT30/J �kAR6"SSE�, gY �� i M k NE7S(C;25 Ri.�+�� r i—H 2EyyN6 c+1� p I ,I Strom cegeL ly,.- { t f-ffi eL r ItsE#aNSp,�! i 7o6s L041A c fayi ap Poor Quality —7��ev_ tiz I 0 SEP 2u 1983 '44-nr /j/ faT T�7� ' 4k Ali feciL l(?/Mldi ..i /. � Jet C f� �d i- OOSC Cl 76vi t A- 4& 0-71 Art A4 t0 .5tc tZa q�c t� �. tilt.., U � � `C,,n _ _ iKcRaa,St irk J',. -lisle tOL JaC-1 1 J � (NA rLw o� el J � ` �p 5 Wad tv,nl k,-4t►e. s, 1C °37 11 U� 4iksal Poor Quality t v O4tJ]- ` rJL W lRL ,46 �1�4QN`e�c\ AO �4� t+ca Ryc�S IL i • � � i Rf 0 �f � ,�L 1 !'�Ir�' � its S• /� 0 r Nita 1 d h Ov ifZ. ot66�,iw I r I 4L,- l.a�e '004 • - - 64IL n cnL- OIL C1,S tr,SSef iL- ZW- 8540 ARCHIBA',11, SUITE B. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 . (714) 980-2244 September 22, 1988 BY MZSE1%,GM Mr. Brad Puller City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Buller: Reference is made ZZ our ,'Application dated July 14, 1988 for a General Plan Amen -ITK— t %;onoerning Highland and Milliken Neighborhood Commercial ercial ,and M Residential Properties.. P3-ase consider this letter as The William '.,yon CarPany's request that you modify the above mentioned application by changing the residential use designation from MH to M concerning the parcel located west of Milliken Avenue. The result of this modification .3f our proposal would be the elimination of appro>drtately 185 "rental" apartment its and instead provide for approximately 100 "for sale" tam1house /condominium residentiel homes, Clearly it is our desire to proceed with the modified amendment without delay. r� .. lrer truly t,1-5e LEA/ 'Jonas F+. Paily SEnior Vice Presi ent cc .john Markley, The vjill�Zm Lynn Canpany John Potter. RAghes Development a jK-gD REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 11 --V'IUUAM LYON tif�.3J�'if%F, JAMES ! * BAILEY seHtoarce rtssroerm Septeober 22, 19be Mr, Brad Buller City Plnmer City of Rancho Cucamonga 4320 Baseline Road u Hancho - %ramanga_ California 91730 Dear Brad: r Oclosed is %y request for mxiifying our proposed j� General Flan anm -4,ent as We discussed. k We ceri'.a_inly bea from the ccmukity loud end clear that they d__ not waat an apartment project locates within Groves oeighbonccod of `✓ictoria. T hope this chaige in aue proposal is seen as a strong indication that our caq= -ny sloes lister , ad is, very much concerned with the needs and desires o," t' o Vii -toria Camunity. ,Tames P. Bailey IWArchlba,dAv Mlu%6- ft-- ch aCuOOm4ngoOWL9MO(isd)92p-2 ?••4 RESOLUTION NO. to A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING C"IIsslod OF THE CITY OF RAWCHO CUCAiONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING Arpk:,,It OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03E, TO CHANGE THE LAND ;ISE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUI;�tIIGH RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHCI D COMMERCIAL FOR 12.9 ACRES OF LAND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORtF.R OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, AND FROM NEIGHBOR"PID C"ERCiAL TO MEDIUM- HIGH RESIDEh7IAL FOR 9_3 ACRE$ OF LAND AT TNT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ;;ILLIKEN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND Ai:NUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MAKING FINDINGS Iii SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The William Lcc Company has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 88 -�03E as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the suhJect General" Amendc�rent ie deferred to as "tke application", (ii) On September 28, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cvcamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. D. mesolut''an. "L, IVEREFORE, it is hereoy found, determinod and asolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho CucamGga as Follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finbs that all Of the Cacts set forth in the Recitals, part A, of this Resolution are true and corre! *. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September ' , 1988, inclu6 *,Iq written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically minds as follows: acres of land,( asically rectangular configurations, locatedelat thegsouthelst corner and southwest corner of Milliken and Highland Avenves; and is Presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Neighborhood Commercial to the west Lnd Medium -kYgh Residential to the east; and (b) The property' to the no-th of the subject site is designated Very Low (2 dwel?ing units per acre) and Low (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Re ^identiai; hcwever, bisected by the Fo`dhill Freeway covridor which is V -'.w' The property to the west ',, designated Low Medium Residential (4--8 dwelling cn:ts per acre) and is developed with Single Family Homes. The property to the east is designated Medium 9esidential (8..4 thglsouthuistdes gnated ?*di m R s denti -1, Facility 8 -14 dwells g inits� per acre) and Is vacant. PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NOo OPNERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03E VALE 2 AOL (c) This anendirent does not ct)nflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a ma,.oer consistent with the General Flan and with related development; and (d) Titus amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element: and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the enviornment and /nor the surrounding properties arc that a Negative Declaration be issued- 3. Based upon the evidence presented to this Commission itiring the above - referenced p. -lid heating and uron the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 as follows: above, this Commiasion hereby finds and concludes (a) That the subs ^ct property is suitable for the uses ,permitted in the proposed district in tem of access, size, and compatibility with existing land itse in the surrounding_ area; e ` (b) That tine proposed amendment would not : signifiCet4t impocts on the environment ;vt. surrougding, properties; and (c) 'fiat the proposed amenkent is in conformance with the Gene -al Plan. 4. This Co 'Oaission hereh} Finds and certifies that the project has i baen revie4ed and ecnsiderad .� :sOrlance witt,, the Caiifftrnia Environmental, ) Quality Act of 1970 and, rectarien,� (.trtiflc,i,ion of a Negative Declaration to the City Coun(:ii. 5. 3ased upon i,:rt findings and concli�si�ns set forth in paragraph 1, is and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 55855 of the California Go—)rcment Code, that the Planning Commission cf the City of Rancho Cucamonga tareby approves on the 28th day of September 1988, General Plan Amendx�„nt No. 88 -03E. 6. The " retary to this Cc :sraitsion shall cWtify to the adoption of this Resolutiei�. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION XD. a214£P.AI PLAN AMENOM1117 88 -OIE PAGE S Ar'PROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 0TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1983, FLANNINO e O hMISC?ON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC,'i.MONGA BY; arty T. Wcffiel, Chairman ATTEST: `�raa u er, ecre ary I, Brad Buller,, Speretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do iL. ey certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted to the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cur�mrpnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Ctmission held on the PSth day of September 1186, by the follor ng vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: NnEa: COWISSIONERSt ABSENT: C`.o'l j SIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. ank RANCHO LCUCOAMONGA,rHCALIFOR IAA RECCOMMENDINa FAPPROVING OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -07 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORH=D COMMERCIAL FOR 12.9 ACRES OF LAND AT THE SOUTHEAST' CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, ANn FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL FOR 9.3 ACRES OF LAND AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIY.EN AVENUE AND HIGHLAN:F� XNUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MAKING FINDINGS III SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The William Lyon Company has filed an application for a Vitoria Cow. unity Plan Amendment No. 38 -0? as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter to this Resolution, the subject Victoria Cc?ahuni' Plan Amendment is referred tows "the application ". Rancho Cucamonga 0conducted September duly noticed the public hearing onsthe application. B. Resol!ition. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City --f Rancho Cucamonga as follows: set forthlin the -this' Re taals, PartrR,,b his f4 soli tion are true and at the facts cot -ect. 2. lased upon substantia eviO =e presented to this CoMission during the above - referenced aiblic hearing on September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, togethe., with p, -blic testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: acres of land, (basics y eta gu1a; configura`,ioas, located approximately the 9southeast corner and southwest cerher of tiu iker and Highland. Avenues; and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium -Iligh Residential to the east and Neighborhood Commercial to the west; designated Very Low (22 dwelling property per acre)tar•i of Low (2-4 dwe site is per acre) Residential; however; bisected by the Foothill freeway corridor which is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low Kadium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with Singe Family Homes. The property tJ the east is designated tedium Residential (8 -14 i,�lling units P=r acre) Community Facility and is vacant. The property to the soy +th is designated Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and is vacant. PLANNING COfktISSION RESOLUTION NO. VICTORIA COMMUNIiY PLAN AMEND. 88 -07 Page 2 (c)- This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will Provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (dj This amendment promotes the goals aad objectives of the Lang' Use Element; and (e) nis amendment would n)t be mitterially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the enviornmant and /nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration be issued. 3. Based upon the evidence ^resnted to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject' property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, acid compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts . on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (and, further, this CoWission recommends a Nega?-i've Declaration to the City Council. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65bSO to 658 -5 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 28th day of September 1988, Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 88 -07. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolvtlo�.r. ILI- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VICTORIA:COMMUNIT( PLAN k4END. 88 -07 Page 3 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTF74BER 2988. PLiv,AIh'O COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF P.AHCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry i. Miel, Chatirian ATTEST: Buller, secretary' I, Brad Buyer, Secretary of, the Planning Conallssion of the. City of Rancho CRScamongz,, do he certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly 'introduced, passed,, end adopted by the Planning Cc%imission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular weting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of September 198413', by the following vote -to -Wit: .AYES: COWiSSIONERS'; NOES: COWfW ISSiONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONEiRS: y j )< 01 { i� M, 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SPA 88 -03E - WILLIPM LYON COMPANY September 28, 1988 Page 4 A. The subject properties have both been found suit ?b1P' for intended use proposed by the afaendment. 8. The intended used have been found compatible Ylth V - surrounding areas in terms of access, vehicle /q�sdestrian circulation, and intensity. C. The proposed amendment will not have any adverse environmental impacts that can not be mitigated. D. The amendment is in conformnce with the goals and objective of the General Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE; This item has been r',vertised as a pubifc hearing in tFe a�Ty epor�t newspaper, the property posted., and notices sent to a p�f roperty owners w1thin 300 fret of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff r:ecowepAs that the Planning Commission adopt a a- ached Resolution recsxavertding approval of the General Plan Amendment 88 -03E and Victoria Comity Plan A,rgend:nent 88T07 to the City Council and issue a Negative Declaration, therch allowing the d�,'ignations to swite, from Medium High Resido tial "Cc Neighborhood Commercial between the-two sites. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:JG:js Attachments Exhibit "A" - General Plan Map Exaibit "a" - Site Nap Exhibit °C" - Petition Exhibit "D" tethers Resolution of Approval for 6 neral P'an Amendment Resolution of Approval fo- Victoria Community Plan Amendment ' .y environmr.tal impacts which would result if the project were ITEi L — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT AMhk r DATE: September 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MASTER ENYIROMENTAL ASSESSMENT (MEA) AND EtNIROV.4ENTAL f IMPAC F REPORT' E C - A comprehensive study o er y e env ronmen c aracte-istics and constraints of the General Plan area. As an MEA, the document will provide a central source of curr6at environmental infor e.tion to assist in identifying long range, area wide, and cumulative impacts of individual projects prop:-red in the General Plan area. I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to consider the Draft Master Environr -ntal Assessment (MEA) and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Technical Update. This. report summarizes the environmental issues analyzed in the Draft MEApEIR and recommends cont;nuanre of the public hearing to allow for review of public crswE.,rts on the document. II. BACKGROUND: In 1987, the Planning Division began work on rn Tcecc r cTa-1 —and administrative update of the City's General Plan. The project would involve an update of the document to reflect a.i policy changes F'rd decisions made since its adoption in 1981, an(' removal of superfluous language. In addition, an update of the General Plan EIR was anticipated to give the City a more meaningful document which !ould serve as a :Master Environmental Assessment (MEA). The use of the document as a MEA would help eliminate the need for at east some future EIR`s associated with the individual projects or decisions, and would simplify the environmental review process in general. The p-opnsed General Plan Technical Update con,titates a "project" as defined by stale law and also requires c discretionary action by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is the "Lead Agency ". Because the City rust take a discretionary action to approve or deny the Update, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that the action be reviewed to det€:r ine the potential environmr.tal impacts which would result if the project were ITEi L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEA /EIR September 28, 1988 Page 2 carried out. The purpose of this EIR is to inform the public t,d decision makers about the nature of the General Plan, about the kinds and extent of impacts which the Plan ap:i its alternatives are expected to have on the environment. III. DISCUSSION: This Draft MEA /EA' will serve to update the City's exis ng eneral Plan EIR and Technical Appendices, and will address with particular emphasis the foliowing areas of impact as they „elate to the updated General Plan goals, policies, and objective;. LAND USE HOUSING POPULATION ECONOMIC "ZVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION PUBLIC FACILITIES NATURAL RESOURCES HFALTH AND SAFETY COWUNI'TY SERVICES With the exception of air quality • (NATURAL RESOURCES), all of the environmental impacts of the General Plan are either beneficial or can be mitigated so as not to be significantly adverse. Special study or constraint zones exist withir, the City 'due to concerns about geology (seismicity), topography (slopes), soils (windblown sand), and hydrology (flooding). A number of biological resources have been identified in the sphere area nc:th of the Cit1 limits which should be preserved. The futuri traffic circulation system in the City depends on the cons tuctian an a freeway /expressway in the proposed Foothill Freeway Corridor. ;'he most serious threat to City residences nnted in the report is the seasonal flooding along several unimproved creeks or cha,mels. Build out of this City to aLnosti 59,000 dwelling units will effectively double the level of urban infrastructure and service needed after the year 2010,. All utility and public service providers in the City should evaluate their expansion plans relative to this assessment. The provision of adequate libraries, parks, ,,rails and possibly schools may not keep pace Stith the development unless there is adequate long range planning. At ,,resent, most service expansion plans aproear a0aquate to accotmnodate growth if sufficient futtaing is provided. The City also has sigrificant scenic and cultural resources that should he protected as development occurs. E /i r 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEAIEIR September 28, I98B Page The composition in growth of population, housing, and employment within the City appears to be healthy and should remain so as the City builds out ac —rding to the General Plan. As the City grows traffic, noise, al, pollution, wash: water and solid waste will increase in amounts similar to other .southern California suburban communities of similar size aM deversity. the development of *he City's sphere of influence according to the:'1 General Plan, could acrd up to 8,500 units in this area, Th a level of development would place additional requirements on City utilities and services Which will be comparatively greater than the impacts of development within the City limits. This is due to such limiting factors as vehicular access, elevation, slopes, fiensitive biological resources, and other physical constraints. Several alternatives including "no project'' were examined. Development within the City is related to but does not , ctually cause growth- inducing impacts and will require the c=Jtment of irriversible and ivretrievable "esourceg, as well as produce many significant accrma ative ervirEt'mrental impacts. The environmental assessment matrix (see EIR txecutiv(t �u!►mary) sunasarixes the environmental impacts of the City's General Plan. As a result of the air quality impacts, a statement of overriding considerations will reed to be approved by the City at the time or the document certification. Draft document has been circulated to the state clew °ng mouse and Interested agencies for a Fs day review period. tslmrents from those agencies have been received and the project cttitasultant ss currently drafting appropriate responses and additions to the draft document. Ccaff will take the comments received fron the public testimony this evening far, inclusion into the draft environmental impact report. The aamended document will then be ready for Planning Cotrmissirn consideration to recommend certification by the City Council. PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT MWEIR September 28, 1988 Page 4 IV. REC ENDATION: It Is recomme�ided that after public testimony the pu c ,ear ng" br; continued tr the Octoba: 12, 1988 Planning Cormis.:ion meeting' Respe ly su/ d, a' ity Pla er BE :AW:mlg Attachments: Written Responses to Draft !_R Draft HEA /EIR (under sepa: --te coieer ADMINISTRATION Frank A. Cosca, Jr " d.D. tra, drool District District Superintendent �s School ! >bar Ingrid Vogel iffthill Blvd i Rancho Cucamonga. California 91,730 j (714) 989 -8541 AssirtantSuperintendent BusrnessSersices �r September 12, 1988 rJ Larry Henderson, Senior Plainer City of Rancho Cucamongr, _ Planning Department - P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Requested Revision to the Rancho MEA Planning Section III for the Central School Di,ltrict. Dear Mr. Henderson: I have reviewed the data relating to Central S .1:.ao1 District it. the Rancho MEA Plan and request that the following changes are made to reflect adequate information for our school district: PAGE 139 - Exhibit "A" to reflect correct design capacity for 1987 -88 including and/or excluding leased portables PAGE 143 - Exhibit "B" to refler..t curreWa enrollment of 3880 to agree with page 139 and projected enrollment forecast of 5616 for 1992 -3 PAGE 147 - Exhibit. "c" Central School District has very datailed student generation ratio and this information should be reflected and the note changed PAGE 148 - Exhibit "D" to reflect actual and projected enrollment for Central School District If you have any questions, please call me at 989 -8541. Si erely, Ingrid Vogel Assistant Superinterdent, Business Services J] Enclosures c: Lauren Wasserman Fran.'. Cosa;k BOARD OF YRUS.EES _ - - Henry L Stop _ ANonia L Rua.. Debbie Baker Ruth A. Musser Andrew 7silot A�esrdeni Clerk Alember - .Member Member TABLE III -R /B PRESENT ENROLLMENT AND CAPACITY OF CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 1'911 ;t" School Current Design and Location Enrollment Capa�:t2yl O�R'•#c�nj P' aa= ansa¢ a: saa��aavlc� ............... ;,......aesn Bear Gulch Elementary School 493 560 8355 Bear Gulch Place Central Elementary School $81 fib � +� 7W Archibald Avenue Coyote Canyon 421 0 � 11075 Terra Vista. Parkway PC.* f f Cucamonga Junior High School 1,101 0 ` 7611 Hellman Avenue Dona Merced Elementary School 723 8 S�� M7 10333 Palo :alto Street J Valle Vista Elementary School 66i -12 r.� 7727 Valle Vista Drive _ Total 3,880 389 'Design capacity does not include leased or rented portables 4 with r %rsa Poor Quaty .� The Central District nod a compiet4t Mast r Ptah pr ;pared by wOif- ng• Christopher in 1986. This district is situai;d in an %; "- -' ­,st corridor In th ^.:en! of the city and includes the ierrn Vista Planned Community/The Master Plar, id ant' es short - !arm (rive year) en.milmert trends and facilities need for all the schools in t , dn-trict, it is anticipated that enrollments will increase Croon isili at present to at some point beyond 1490. Thera are several proposals before the Board of Education that address stu- dent housing plans over a longer period of time The Coyote Canyon School in Terra Vista consists of all portable buildings and will house students from the planned community un- til a new. state - funded permanent Schott is constructed to lvMou nta_n View just west of Mil. liken. The Stiwanda School district occupies the northeantrn portion of the city, According to the district, an elementary school kiesigned to accammouate atxproximalety 300 students is currently under construction anti is tentatively schcduled to open in Pall 1988. A seAond elementary school is planned for construct on in Fall *K Than school. however, will be ideated in Pontnna. depending o!t this school`s enroltrns -nt rate and the ability or altern..te available schools within till, City schools to accorrAodate the stuucnt Population, students may be bussed Out Of the City to the FOlitana school site. The Edwanda School District is negotiating for the acquisition of adoitional school sites which have already been selected within Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. The Alta Lorna District is located in the northwest Dart of the city. School sires Car an ciementary and junior high school, located in the Vitoria Groves arcs and along Hermosa Averue respectively, have been purchased by the district. Construction of both schools has not been scheduled r;nce the State has not allocated the necessary rands to raranciec construction. ti'hii:. the construction or the junior high school has been d ':ya« duc to lac,. ur : undliq -. retocambic classrooms arm expected to be placed or ;h_ s ;t, r,., thz ekmentsry school. Cottscqu;nrly, this school is expected to operate as a temporary l`- acility until :finding is made available, This school will then undergo construction or a more Permanent stature. In tha sr;antime, plans to conr.rut;t an addltionrI rte::nentary school (the s :ts not yet purchased), are currently being formula+ -+. Aces °fig to the Cucalnanga School Distrit', the' proposed elementary School. Ontario C en _ r School, has been dengned to handle an estimated 600 students and open in 1990. The District k.as id4ntified two schot%ls, R2,4ctso COCart,onga Middle School sn:'. Cucamonga )lemcntstry School, as being heavily impacted by the growth occurring within the City. According to the Cucamonga District, a committee has been formed to constder enlarging Ranr%a Cucamonga Middle School by adding a wing. This will conserva- tively double the schdt 't present rapacity. The development stage has been provisivnalty targeted for 1994:. " ;i, supplemental portable classrooms were recently, added onto the -- camonga Elementir Scdoai, it is yet experiencing difficulty :in adequately ttrcommodat- Mg the student population. The District predicts that file need to allocate udditional port - t ble elhssrooms vriU only mitinat its the futrre, Rancho M�A- Section ill 1" Past-143 0701-02 o 9-28-88 PC Agenda 3 Of 5 - -7- TALE TIT -R /'V STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student School District Generationt aiaa aaa -ft -ft iaM- UMaaa9Qiaaaaaaa Alta Lomo Elementary (elementary K -6) 0.6 (junior high 7.8) 0.6 Central K- G . 33C1 CChaffey Union High (9 -12) 0.15 Cucamonga Elementary 0.6 Etiwanda Elementary (K -S) OAO (6-8) 0.0 City- -Wide Total' EIementnTy(K -8) 0AS High Schoo](9 -12) 0.17 TOTAL. 0.62 IF 'AIl districts *neero- Seebal maintain records' or students per household for projection purposes. 'Averaged" values based on Citywide data compiled from all districts except Central. Rancho MEA- Section IIT 4/ 07 k ... '�'- Il�lllllla�liJs Page -147 i ( -:'W- 4,1111 t Utautct Enrolintettt FerecaTiv 1988 -1992 Page xi Student Generation Ratios by Housing Types P uM'1 N� �. N M G G u tNR 4 w I G !1 Q G C Ci D O 1 n v 1M M C C O a O Q¢ a 0 u o u I\ o a O �yy ii tlT tt. O O A D O O C O O g O P q HER q 6 n q 6 q P¢¢ P¢ R O Q q 6 P¢ O •� K p R �. " O Cl O Cf O O G O P u Q i C? Ci C] r 1 l M it O' n P tr a ococioad00 It a n oca n n . cy C O 6 p g O q in ti M N q' dRDOOacPO o n aDo Ca aoeiaeiCid 1{ ei cosi r n n Q O S •a. ` n r 1� O W ° onoao2; 8 3 O ri ii co u u z � o C IS :i. a C :i u o n ei o ei 0 Y �✓ i �GD CI is �. k2� r w y= o •O n .� n N r. p H O N n a A N !q G D µ iy O C O O O. O P O i 1 Q O 4 O ,.a. rr O O C} b' C1 . � CS Q P f� O ,� A O Q O N M. ✓ a v v u u n It b V s b N V M tG tin te�� N N i it nJ a lbw V ta +{ CO 0 N RC n Fca a u U n N o N Iu S �O � o C•p t Dp 1�{ qq p n n t1 V y tl f..Npl co tT M .M ~p M My v It p 4 Q O p. O O It Is M v O C Cl O 0 O O P D C; It O It a u it It It < p i ii G m O G u q UN. M o O O u0'. Ate. n N u M d C y it O a Q 0 Q' O C O n h u '1 t c Q a ¢ Q d Q CS ¢ o a Is It d N V 11 ;i It tf iA b b Ic Y O C It Y� N M Y rJ1 'O !. 4 u li tr Sd !L A It, g -8 v t s n 2 p 0 ii Q M p <' Gt N W 11 /:J q Ci P {:! V' • t7 V n r 11 h h ""�� IIt2tIIQ:tC210tt s m 51M. 11 2) fl TABLE III >R /G l'RC3ECTED SCHOOL ENROLLMENT IMPACTS Total A=11 r .1988 5989 1990 District Capacityt 1986 1987 ssrasmma�esusmasasaeseasaasecsasasmssmmsmmsRassmsmr rsssssmusmms Alta Lonna 6829 »3: 6042 t6�111�3 6503 6890 Central f 499,- Ntpt Cucamonga 2093. 1163 1482 1779 NA, NA IOTA Etiwanda 1732. 952 1349 1796 2460 3371 ChaPfev 7000 6870 7145 7350 7800 8251 Union' Elem:ntary 13.0.08 (K•8) High school$ 4,991 (9 -1'-) -P iTotai capacity may or may not include portable DlxusrooTm lependint an riirtiiat's mathod at calculating capacity only *:% or 600 students at Chaffey High ara from psaeha Cucamonga $only, counts students itt Chxffey District from Rancho Cucamonga NA - f1twes not prepared by diattict Rancho MEA- 5detian III 1 Ertrnllnr� nt Frr,•rcrlt � .14.1 ti,; y�_ lift Central School District Summary Di( xict Enrollment Histor ► and Forecast t �7 C P f• O N N Yf N5 Q V V b O O O O ` •O O ' 0 r . O P [p�.� m O V• D Q iD P � A � � D VAS W H:N N v SC VS ` f� .A•• ^ .O m V N � Q •O SO. N IM1 N N v N V M ry v O .- � +T� m K p0 V• VS �T V N. V wT �P M M N. V M O ^- M 4 M A V m V v V V V M M V A N b Y Y i0 k a O N SL N M 9 O V 2 P a 5 i M {, M MA1 M. M M M M. M M N N c U 2F yLy D M A p M M M N M M N M M p O q N m U V M M N N L y M M r� M M N M M N P V A m W o jj pCf � NH WL4 u A 1" iY % DJSInCt Sumta air v S-EF CITY OF UPLAND "Jim Cii of Cjracious .Going" 460 No. Euclid Ave. P.O. Box 460 Upland, California 91786 (714) 982.1352 September 6, 1988 Brad Buller, City r.anner Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, 'CA 91701 Dear Mr. Buller: REF: Response for the Master Environmental Assessment, General Plan Amendment a,,d Environmental Impact Report drab, The City of Upland has reviewed the Draft Master Environmental Assessment and offers the following comments: '. The relationships of development within Rancho Cucamonga and Upland is not addressed. The impact of buildout on the City of Rancho Cucamonga is ad- dressed, but no mention is made of the impacts on surrounding cities. 2. Mobile and point source emissions as based on build -out estimates represent a significant and adverse impact. Every attempt should be made to promote the specific mitigation measures as outlined on Page 107 of the Environmen- tal Assessment. The guidelines for pollution control should be based on South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Management Plan of 1988. 3. The analysis of the circulation element does not address the impacts on the City of Upland in either short term or cumulative long term impacts. The proposed cost for the proposed major traffic improvements is not addressed, for either city. The analysis of traffic circulation indicates that the 1986 General Plan understated the anticipated traffic impact by 25 %. In light of this find- ing the Draft Environmental Impact Report makes no reference to the antici- pated additional impact to t`.e City of Upland resulting from Rancho Cucamonga's continued development. No quantitative analysis is provided of the traffic growth on arterials as the traffic leaves the Rancho Cucamonga city limit. Consequently, no mitigation is recommended to allow these im- pacts to be alleviated. 11 sA E Mr. Brad Builer Page 2 4. The mitigation measures for traffic impacts of complete buildout are based on completion of the Foothill Freeway. It is stated that the traffic vo- lumes will have a significant ;,dverse and cumulative imp ^ct on Rancho Cucamonga if the expressway or freeway is not constructed. There needs to be a specific statement of the short term impacts of traffic volumes on Rancho Cucamonga and Upland until the freeway is constructed and also the impacts of traffic volumes in Rancho Cucamonga and Upland, ill buildout oc- curs prior to completion of the freeway. It is not clear in the Draft En- vironmental Impact Report what mitigation measures will be implemented in the short term, prior to a freeway, to assure that traffic continues to flow within and between the cities. If circulation and land use plans are based on the shift frc,u automobile use to alternate forms of transportation, what are the methods for im- plementing the alternative forms? Ho specific polici;..,s are proposed to assure that the goals for 17% alternative transportation are achieved. What are the significant adverse impacts which will result if this shift does not occur? 5. No coordination of traffic circulation between Rancho Cucamonga and Upland is identified. A system wide impact analysis should be conducted to an- alyze the impacts of traffic generated from Rancho Cucamonga to adjacent areas. 6. The long - term costs of operaV on to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Police and Fire protection should be addressed to assure the cities continued cost effective operations. The City of Upland is continuing its analysis of the Draft Environmental Impact Report. It is our intention to provide further comment during the public hear- ing process. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding our comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely yours, JeffrheyA Bloom, Planning Director Upland Planning Department JAB /JJZ;bjr September 6, 1988 C7:, City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Planning Division P. 0. F..Clx 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. Larry Henderson, Senior Planner Subject: Draft Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan Environmental Impact Report Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Draft Environmental. Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan Update. The District, by correspondence dated February 29, 1988 and March 1, 1988, submitted comments for incorporation intp the City's General Plan Update and the related Draft EIR. In our February 29, 1988, correspondenco the District presented a number of comments pertaining to the proposed general plan update. In this correspondence, the District had requested that the City address the consistency-of the existing general plan land use designation for our administrative site (8555 Archibald Avenue; APN's 209 -041 and 47) with the surrounding land uses -. At that time, it was the District's understanding that the land use designation For this site was lot>r density residential. The District questioned the consistency of the low density residential designation with the surrounding land uses which include existing commercial .and industrial business park uses. From our review of Figure II -4 of the Draft EIR, it appears that the District's existing administrative office site is actually designated for commercial development not low density residential. The District ).s requesting that the City provide clarification on what the actual Land use designation for our administrative site is. Also, in the February 29, 1983 correspondence, the District had requested that the City consider implementing the original general plan policy regarding the use of reclaimed water suppliers when available. This request was made in recognition of the District's plan to move forward with the construction of the proposed Regional Plant No„ 4 (RP -4) facility in southeastern Rancho Cucamonga. Scheduled to be operational in 1993, it is anticipated that approximately 20 million gallons per day (MGD) of high quality reclaimed water will be ultimately available for reuse purposes. 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - POST OFFICE BOX 89� RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 DWIGHT F. FRENCH GEORGE A. @UR @A y tllOHN L`ANDEt.SON AZ__/ � ---- `---_ Pneid�n! EDWARD A GIRARD Vla.tntidsn! Setrdery /Tnetursr A..r c .... ti.,.rr.._...... ANNE W. DUNIHUE Ell CHINO HABIN MUNICIPAL WATER OI6TRICT g555 ARCHIBALD AVENUE • P- O. BOX' 697 - CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA The availability of reclaimed water from RP -4 represents an alternative water supply source which could decrease demands upon both local and imported potable water supplies. The EIR should address the Potential benefits of implementation of the City,s existing general plan policy on the use of reclaimed water supplies. Reclaimed grater from the R2 -4 facility could have many beneficial uses within the City. Potential uses of the reclaimed, water include unrestricted landscape irrigation, rerreational lakes and industrial institutional reuse pur,,oses: and - In review of section III -W of the Draft EIR, a number of corrections regard:Ing the current capac -tty and the scheduling of the capacity expansions at our wastewater reclamation facilities require clarification. The Regional Plant xo. 1 (RP -1y facility in Ontario is currently rated at a capacity of 32 MGD. By a series of inter- related expansion projects, RP -1 will be expanded to a capacity of 36 MOD in early 1989 and to a capacity of 44 Nr7D in 1990. The proposed RP -4 facility is scheduled to be operational in 1393 with 'an initial capacity of 7.5 MGIp. f The District believes that the coumcs".ts presented above should be addressed and incorporated into the text of the Fiscal EIR, if you should have any questions or if the District can be of any assistance, please contact the undersigned. w�eAry truly yours, r� /lam Mark N. inse , Planning and Administr tive Services CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT MNR:sf STATE OF CALIFORNIA. CALIFORNIA REGIONAL VJATER QUALITY CONTROL HOARD GEORGEOEUKMEJIAN GorgnOF SANTA ANA REGION 6809 INDIANA AVENUE, SUITE 200 t +s RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92506 PHONE. (714) 782 -4130 CiTy 1100: August 25, 1988 EP 2 Larry Henderson Alan Warren City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 DEIR: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT GENERAL PLAN TECHNICAL UPDATE, SCH $88020115 Dear Messrs. Henderson and Warren: We have reviewed the subject document and have the fc%llowing concerns: 14ATER QUALITY We note (pp, 43 and 170) that 70% of the City of Rancho Cucamonga community water supply is obtained from 19 grou'ad water wells, with nitrate and dibromochloropropane concentrations exceeding drinking water allowable limits in wells as listed in Table III -F /D.. Since the district plans to use imported water for either recharge or direct distribution to meet projected lemaind'deficiencies (p,. 172), serious consideratiLY should be directed to use of water for recharge in areas where the ground water shows unacceptable contamination /high nitrogen levels.. An effort should be made to reclaim the wells now abandoned because of contamination /high nitrates. If the loss of wells because of unacceptable water quality reduces the available drinking water supply, an effort should be made to moderate growth in this region to maintain an adequate water supply for present /futrre: population. Colorado River water has been noted as being of negligible value as an auxiliary source of water for this area, and imported water supplies from Northern California present not only problems of blending, but also of limitations due to overall ^emulative growth demands in San Bernardino and Riverside counties. In addition, we may note that current activities of the State Water Resources Control Board to review the water rights decision which relates to use of the State Water Project make it unwise to assume that imported water supplies will be available to support all of the projected growth in this region. This subject should be given very careful consideration in the DEIR and in any general plan Policies/programs now being considered by the City. J7_ /6 SEWER We are concerned that sep., c systems, which currently 3ervico 25% i. of the population of this area (r. 173), present potential for contamination of the ground water supply. Tte predominantly good water quality of the Chino Basin in the Rancho Cucamonga area could be degraded by either nutrients or bacteria. We strongly recommend that every effort be made to provide sewer 'service to repl,ce the present septic systems, especially in areas with soil limitations, and that future growth be accompanied by ability to serve with full Sewer service. We suggest that "Mitigation Measures" (p. 175) ae amended to incorporate a•iolicy that all new development must hook up to a sewer system. WASTEWATER Chino Basin Municipal Water District (CCBMWO) provides the wastewater treatement for this area (p. 173) at RP1. However, it is r understanding that the plant provides tertiary service to the <.cancho Cucamonga area. we concur with the C t" of Rancho Cucamonga that coordin;Ati,n water supply, wastewater services, -"rid construction ct needed improvements should precede development. sincerely, Anne Knight Environmental ,Sriciali.st cc: John Keene, State Clearinghouse w/ SCH form x:2275 state of ccfi omk Memorandum Ta Dr. Gordon F. Snow Assistant Secretary for Thr AESMICES AC-84" OF CidtFAi NIA Larry Henderson and Alan Warrern: City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road SC1' 03 Rancho Cucamonga, CF 91701 From pepaam*nt of of the Diuxtev'i'. , CREA�ti:G!•''�t = AUG 2 9 1988 Draft EIR for Master Env. P.ssessment and General Plan Update, SCH #$$020115 The Department of Conservation has reviewed the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City's ,­star Environmental Assessment and General Plan Update, SCH#88020115, and has the following comments to offer. As you know, the State Mining and Geology Board transmitted a copy of a report designating regionally significant construction aggregate resources in the San Beinardino and Claremont- Upland Production-Consumption (P -C) Regions to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in April 1987. in accordance with the provisions of, the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA), Section 2762, the City is required to establish mineral resource management policies in its General Plan that will: (1) recognize the mineral information transmitted by the Board; (2) assist in the management of land use in designation areas; and (3) emphasize the conservation and development of identified mineral deposits. The City's -Draft EIR includes information on the aggregate extraction resource areas, but it is not clear if -:, Bement policies have been established that will accomplish the objectives of SMARA section 2762. SMARA Section 2762(b) requires that proposed mineral resource management policies be submitted to the State Mining and Geology Board for review and comment prior to adoption. The Department of conservation would, therefore, recommend that the City's proposed mineral policies be formally submitted to the attention of Ms. Deborah Herrmann, special Representative, State Mining and Geology Board, 1416 9th Street, Room 1326 -2, Sacramento, California 958'_4, telephone (916) 322 -1082. The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR. If I can be of any assistance, please feel free to call me at (916) 322 -5873. Dennis J. O'Bryant Environmental Program Coordinator cc: Deborah L. Herrmann Special Representative State Mining and Geology Board State sf California Memorandum 1. Projects Coordinator Resources Agency y� 2. City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road 3 SAP ° �� • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 From De partment of Fnh and G mma The Rosource3 Agency t 24, 1988 -r Subject: ` Master En,.zronmental Assessment and General Plan Environmental Impact Report (MEA /DEIR): City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County - SCH 88020115 we have reviewed the MEA /DEIR for the CiLy of Rancho Cucamnngars General Plan update. This document was prepared to serve as a baseline of information which developers and agencies can incorporate by reference into other planniz,t and environmental documents. The project area includes over 30,000 acres, including 22,737 acres within the City limits and 7,704 acres within the City's sphere of influence to the north. The project area is largely developed but includes several resources of significant interest to the Depai -ment of Fish and Game. These include riparian wetlands and chaparral habitats that may be mountain sheep wintering ranges, and a unique wetland (identified in the MEA /DEIR as a "sage marsh ") at the confluence of Lay Creek and East Etiwanda Canyon. That area includes the state- and federally- endangered slender- horned spineflower (Chorizanthe le toceras) and the state- endangered Nevin's barbery (Hei errs neylnll ), The MEA /DEIR provides only a cursory analysis of the biotic resources within thG planning area. In order to be useful to future analysA , specific mapping of sensitive wildlife habitats should have '--en provided.: Also, the MEA /DEIR is incorrect in its inferences r>_garding legally protected species as discussed on page 32. Tie California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15380 indicates clearly that species meeting the criteria established in the definitions of "rare" and "endangered" are rare or endangered pursuant to CEQA requirements whether or not they are formally listed. Thus, species listed by the California Native Plant Society, candidates for federal or state listing, and other rare and locally unique species should be considered as rare or endangered for purp-+ses of CEQA compliance. Impacts to these species or their habite "+'s in addition to impacts to state - or federally - listed species are significant adverse impacts pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15065. Streamside woodland wetlands are ,extremely valuable wildlife habitats. It is the Department's policy to oppose projects which would result in a net loss of elthec wetland acreage or wetland habitat values. The City should desipate all wetland areas as L -l�l lZ -2- natural open space and should encourage the conservation of this resource. The loss of any wetlands which cannot be feasibly protected sr44uld be compensated through the creation of wetlands of no less acreage and of no less habitat value than those wetlands which would be lost. While we agree that counties generally attempt to consider local agency planning efforts, we must point out the large difference between the 8,500 dwel'ing units which the City proposes within its sphere of influence and the 1,000 dwelling units currently allowed under the County's west Valley Foothill Community Plan (page 10). Our recommendation for this area is to accept the County's planned densities to allow a buffer between the C ty and the Angeles National Forest. We are particularly concs?:ner, about proposed use changes in the Day Canyon area, and we rec;x4aaend that C11 of the areas of actual and potential mountain sheep habitat be designated Resource Conservation. if this dctument is to serve as' a useful tool in planning for . future growth within the City's sphere of influence, the MEA /DEIR should contain accurate and detailed information regarding the location of, and fish and wildlife values associated with, . important fish, wildlife, and sensitive plant species habitat. Such information is of extreme importance in planning for growth in areas where impacts to fish and wildlife resources may be minimized. For these reasons, we recommend against certification of the MEA /DEIR at this time; and we recommend that the MEA /DEIR to substantially upgraded to provide a firm foundation upon which to plan for the mature growth of the City of Rancho Cucamonga while minimizing adverse environmental impacts associated with that growth. We emphasize that the MEA/DEIR lacks sufficient detail to allow either the Department or the City to assess the effects of proposed development, and, for this reason, the MEA /DEIR lacks sufficient detail to comply with CEQA requirements. Department personnel are available to provide the City with information regarding the sensitive nature of portions of the more than 30,000 acres contained within the planning area, and to provide recommendations regarding the long -term protection of these areas. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions, please contact ,Fred Worthley, Regional Manager of Region 5, at 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50, Long Beach, CA 90802 or by telephone, at (213) 590 -5113. Pete Bontadelli Director La2D ' —4:r Dc: CAL 7PAtis sB �1 —.t33y t - Sratp cf Cel3fetnia ✓B D.' _ - _ Business. 4ronsperral;en and Nowning Agency 46 omoratidum To State Clearinghouse data September 1, 1988 Office of tolgnning & Research -- 2800 meat Street jl-�-I t-t rte\ i;tcNo.: 06- See -I5- 3.0,/8.6 Sacramento, CA 95614 `• SCH# 88020115 Attention: john Xeene It t From - OVARTMEW OF TRANSPOR4ATiON District 8 �, y 5ubt -4. Rancho Cucamonga GcneraZ Wr hmvr rPvirvfA thr athnsrr— mnntinnM prnjArt inn(, havr. thF FnlZnwznr� comments, In regard tC the Traffic study, we request the following: o An analysis Of fall buildout which includes a forecast of futuce traffic on the State highways o A regional study of the traffic effects to the state highway WAft system. This would include a study that woul Vallay. d show Rancho Cucamonga's contribution to regional traffic in the West a On page 944 the current huitcinufi i$; 25 perrenl- lefts than the previous estimates, therefore the generated trigs should be 25 percent higher. °o On Table Ili -1 /$ the figures are deflated by 2S percent are used for Volume Capacity ratios B"�l Level of Service calcula- tions where the higher number would be more appropriate. o analysis of the circulation system with and without the proposed Route 30 freeway,. In regard to the State highways the following should be implemented: • Prohibition Of Parking on state highways. • The planned intercbzng* at Interstate 15 and 7th Street does not meet federal spacing requirements of interchanges on a freeway. In the 8ydrology section of the General Pianr on page 49, the flood control projects refer to 3980 and 2982, this should-be up -dAte-0 to reflect the current system. It is a Caltrans policy to support economic growth and order.y land use developmarttt however, new development that significantly impacts State highway facilities should have mitigation measutos addressed. Fr o a PL T'RAfIS Sg -43£8 45' State clearinghouse September 1, 1988 In vi eW of the f4c. that Capra s Infrastructure n has no Cucamonga take the leaden nt r We e funds available for ► recommend that the city O.f Rancho developers would hic�hwa system. participate a fund na faiximprovement, mechanism in Wh state e Th ee r � ate -Ity should consider a da,,aand future corridor plan► that plan would mitigate along with th? reduce demand on the Stake hi hwa, gate the effan of Y syster�r growth and In addition, through facility mitigatins the mcisM the state the City shopping center and industrial areas highway awatam for tae rega,onax adjacent'ta Interstate a io al YOU haVo any �Ueet<*�ns, gleage eon2act. Niclaard 'F4'axaco ff at (719) GUY G. VISBAL Chief► Transportatioaz Planning RM -. km c ^f GSmith, Plan Coard Unit, DoTp WHenderson, Of Rancho Larry City of .RanchoaCucamo nga 8776 Archibald.,4.znue Rancho Cucamonga California 91730-4698 (714) 987-8942 September 6, 1988 tj �, "Y", BOARDOF'MOSTEES F�SNNETHBRADSHAW Luis GONZALES DAVID ORTEGA LORAINE M;IV.Ut I EN JULIAN RINCON JOHN F. COSTELLO, ED Supedatendda Larry Henderson Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 "C" BaSe Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mr. Renders-sn. Attached is a revised en.rollment and capacity report zor the Cuca=,nga School District. TMt information that I presented should replace the information on your !rable III-R/C of your Master Environmertal Assessment and General Plan. If there are dny questions regarding this, please don't hesitate td , mtact me. sipqerely" S*uCostello, Ed.D. perintendent Attachment Where Successfd Feaming Happens N-Ifif -.11 U,A10N �EP 06 1988 Cturrviht Design and Location Enrollment Ca achy L Italo X. Bernt Srk --;,1 129 2230 E. Fourth Street 120 C Cucamonga Elemeatary School 780 765 f 8677 Archibald Avenue 1 Guasti Elementary School 137 735 520 North Turner Avenue Los Amigos >lacrentary School 468 48'7 8646 Baker Avenues i Rancho Cucamonga Middle ackool 334 385 10022 Peron Boulevard' l Total. 1,848 1,885 j IDesigii capacity includes permanent and I port able facilities 2Capacity at Rancho includes lab classrooms for computers, Woodshop, runic, Homemaking and Art. These classroomv are not utilized at 100% capacity throughout the day. State of California Memorandum o State Clearinghouse Office of Planning & Research 1400 10th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attention: John Keene From : DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District 8 Subject; Rancho Cucamonga General Flan Bu-' -as, TransporlarZ- and Housing Agency Date ; September 1. 1988 Cif? i State Clearinghouse Page 2 September 1, 1988 In view of the fact that Caltrans has no funds available for j infrastructure improvements, we recommend that the City o'; Rancho C►:ramonga take the lead in developing a fair -share mechanism ,;m which 6evelopers would participate to fund needed improvements to the State highway system. The City should consider a demand management plan along with tae future corridor plao, that would mitigate the effects of growth and reduce demand on the State highway system. In addition, through the fair -share mechanism the City should provide facility mitigations to the state highway system for the regional shopping center and industrial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. If you have any questions, please contact Richard Malacoff at 1714) S81- 4550 bLb I GUY G. V'ISBAL Chief, Transportation Planning Branch RH:km cc: GSmith, Plan Coord Unit, DOTP Alan Warren, City of Rancho Cucamorga Larry Henderson, City of Rancho L-ucamonga j 2-h ��, BAST "B" STREET ONTA RIO �� �G• ` +o,rra`+ CAL1 ORNIA 91764.4196 (714) 986 -1151 August 10, 1988 Mr. Larry Henderson Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucam ,3nga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Henderson= Thank you for the opportunity to review your draft general plan. My staff has read tho document with a Eye toward areas of concern for the City of Ontario. We have identified the following issues. 1. The y:•oposed County jail, in the•southeast corner of Rancho Cucamonga, is not mentioned in the draft. We would like to gee the compsf!.bility of this and surrounding uses analyzed. 2. We questior, tho appropriateness of the General Industrial designation for the property on the north side of Fout•th Street, across from the Guasti Regional Park, a facility which lies in the City of Ontario, but which is probably used as much by Rancho Cucamonga residents as by Ontario residents. - 3. We would like to see the likely effects of County proposals to recharge the upper Chino and Cucamonga groundwater basins addressed in your section on groundwater. 4. We 'think that your ultimate build.-out scenrrios ought to be analyzed in terjs of SCAG *s proposed growth management proposals, especially in the area of jobs and housing balance. 5. Thar industrial designations on the north side of F�nrth Street are likely to require deliveries by large trucks which wouli need to traverse our hotel and commercial areas within the Ontario Center. This situation is less tk.an desirable from our standpoint. Furthermore, the likely development of Ontario Mills, south of Fourth, leads us to conclude that property owners on.the Ranci;o Cucamonga side of that street will probably want to develop their properties in commercial uses in any case. tae suggest that you would be well advised to anticipate this occurrence and have your general plan reflect the likely commercial development of this area. Moreover, commercial development would be more compatible with our general n' - ,t an the south side of Fourth, and, one would assume, be in line with Rancho Cucamonga's community goals. Z•° z? Larry Henderson August 10, '€98! Page No. 2 IF you have any questions please call rr P .e or' Austin .Su 1 _ Sullivan at X99 250br Sincerely, ONTARIO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Zi✓' J4ce I. Babicz ., City Planner JIB:AES;da TRANSPORTATION /FLO j CONTROL COUMY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPARTMENT 1 /J/ ENVIRONMENTAL �e'N /9 PIiELIF 1Y8RKi AGENCY _f est lrhtrd otPlh An B Mwfto, CA 92415 -0835 • (714) 387.2840 'ii �t KE Diroct 'LER August 4, 1988 " .. .9 File:. 1- 4 C!l! '00/4.00 i_( City of .Rancho Cucamonga AM f ,. - n12 Post Office Box $07 41► Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Zone 1 - City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Larry Henderson General Plan Environmental Senior Planner Impact Report The following, comments pertain to the referenced report submitted for review by Your letter dated July 22, 1988. 1, Page 46 - "Flooding" Paragraph 6: The Flood Control Dkstristt is charged with providing flood control and water conservation facilities only within its funding capabilities and limitations. The District's jurisdiction L is limited to those facilities and /cr water course:, where right— of-way has been aaquired. l 2. Figure III - G/1 Flood Control Map, Existing System k a) the map shows debris basins and other drainage facilities that do not exist (i.e. Henderson and Etiwanda Debris Basins, Etiwanda Channel between Interstate 10 and Foothill Blvd, and the unnamed channel between Day and Etiwanda Creeks). b) The map does not show some facilities that do exist { (i.e. Alta Loma Debris Basin and Day Creek Basins). c) The legend infers ril the basins shown are debris basins. Many of t''b basins are used for water conservation or ilow attenuation purposes, not debris retention. d) Alta Loma Storm Drain is an open channel not an enclosed drain. e) A map is attached showing existing and proposed District facilities and known major drainage { proposals by others. rr I City of Rancho Cucmmga August, 4. i�E6 Page 2 f) It is suggested a figure be included in the reptrt showing all proposed emasterplan and drainage improvements. 3• Figure III — T/1, Open Space Plan I Some of the Flood Control lands shown between Deer Creek and Day 7 Creek Channels may be surplus to District needs and be sold for 1 future Oevelopment. 4. Figure III — Tf2, Mavternlon of Trzlis Many of the proposed trails follow District right of way. Their I design should be such that their use does not conflict with the operation and maintenance of the District facilities. Any proposed use should be coordinated with the Flood Control District, Field Engineering Division, Permit Section. The above comments pertain to Flood Control ,District facilities only. The Report has been forwarded to the Transportation Dep(irtment for their comments. !i Should you have any questions ar wish additional information, please contact me at (714) 387 -2525. Very truly yours, 'ROBERT W. CORCHERO, Chief Flood Control Planning Division RWC:alc Attachment i r^: Lou Gamache r. d 0 G3 m �w 0 � ��p f i w ` C7 C6 ;*e W LL w 0 C/) c 0 o w 0- w Cl) z i" 0 ^fit x W- 0 Cf) w-_.I WW 1.- V <0o Wz Z z :aG lw w I if Q,�� w� f. Zi o < <o >w w 0 w wC) =�. -ww=�Q cyocn...�_r�c�ao w � z �J z 0 xz w 0 w � � � w 0;; -1 o ® 3 o w 0 o �M 0 a 3 --� >-o F- z z --� < o!r o v zoz Lu Q z V co C Lj fi X1 w O ( ! t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN 'TECHNICAL UPDATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOrRiA The project is the prPpara on, review, ans adoption of a Technical update of the General Plan consisting of statistical information and imple -aentation measures, and revisions to the Community Design section of the Land Use and Development Element. I. ABSTRACT: The Planning Conmission will hold a public hearing to cons der the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Technical Up /ate. This report outlines the administrative, technical . and statistical updates proposed for the General Plan, as well as significant changes to the Community. Design Element. The Planning Commission should consider input from the public and after deliberation, direct staff on any desired plan modifications. II. BACKGROUND: The technical and administrative updates to the City General an were first discussed in 1986 and were included as a high priority tem in the 1987/88 Planning Division ;pork program. The objectives of the update were as follows: A. To produce. a document to reflect all applicable legislative actions and all policy changes and decisions pertaining to the General Plan since adoption of the document in 1981. B. To remove superfluous language and provide an overall clean up of the document to make it reflective of the community as of 1907 conditions. C. To include a significant revision of the design section to reflect the substantial expansion of the communities` development standards. Also, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), amendments to tha General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) were made in the form of a Master Environmental Assessment ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN TECHNICAL UPDATE September 28, 1988 Page 2 (MEA). Such an update to a MEA would simplify the environmental review process and could eliminate the need for at least some future EIR's associated with individual projects. III. DISCUSSION: The update of the General Plan text can be divided into " l o areas. First is the technical administrative cleaning !!p process which involves no major policy changes except as required by state law. Second is the revision to the Community Design element which does contain significant modifications based on existing Planning Commission _policies and further staff reconnmendatians. This report will divide the discussion between these two areas. The changes have been indicated in the draft update as stp4keeu #s for deletions and bold type for additions with brief explanation notes in the margins. The original text format has been used for the draft, but staff is planning a complete re formatting for the final document. A. Highlights of the Technical /Administrative portions are as o ows: 1. Format consistency has been improved.. Provisions of some sections did not follow the format of the majority of the document. Goals, policies and objectives were not easily evident in some sections and rephrasing and "wording was needed to clarify the text. 2. The Summary was expanded to include some pt..11cies not previously included from the main body of the plan. 3. All maps and charts were updated with the latest available statistics and information. 4. Out of da,,a information, programs and policies (City and other agencies) were deleted. S. fie expansion of Chapter IV, Land Resources section included the addition :;f the identification and protection of aggregate resources for potential future mining. The inclusion of this item is required by the State dining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) which resulted in the following staff recommendations: o The following Objective is added to the Land Resources section (pg. IV -7): "Insure the efficient utilization and conservation of the communities` natural land resources to provide for the health;, safety, and economic welfare of the EA PLANNING C01011SSION STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN TECHNICAL UPDATE September 28, 1988 Page 3 citizens. This may include future mineral extraction in those areas designated by CDMG (Cali'fornia Division of Mines and Geology) as potential sites for aggregate deposits." o The following Policies are added to Land Resources section (pg. IV -11): "Insure the proper management of the flood plains through continued cooperation with the County Flood Control District." "Establish development standards for mining operation sites and adjacent land uses to provide adequate buffers between potential non- cormpatib%- activities." "The City shall require, by recu.- :cation, on property titles with new land subdivision in the affected mineral resource areas, a notice identifying the presence of ide.itified mineral deposits." These policies will be implemanted by an amendment �o the City's subdivision ordinance (refer to Chapter IV, Implementation section). 6. The State requires the amendir,3 of the Housing Element is by the middle of 1989. As a result, staff determined it would be more appropriate to withhold any changes to this section y,atil the full amendment process later in this fis ^al yew% %. The Public Facilities section contains revisions requested by the Parks and Recreation Commission as a result of recent policy determinations. 6. Community Design - The most significant charges to the City's eve opmen. p iTosophy have been in the area of design. As the Community matures, it's goals and aspirations for it's future character have expanded to reflect a high quality theme. With this in mind, staff has formulated numerous changes to the design element for the ComMissica's consideration which are as follows: 1. General Design Principals have been added (pg, III -125) to provide non- specific guidance for "quality design." 2. The Natural Environment section (pgs. III -"-J, 131) contair :d policies on "clearly defined edges" u.,ich staff felt were in conflict with other design policies which encourage the natural blending and softening of the planted 0�1 -3 PLANNING c"rsSIOu STAFF ''PORT GENERAL PLAN TECHNICAL UPDATE September 28, 3988 Page 4 11 landscape. As a vesult, much of these Puilcies were replaced with ones which encourage natural transitions between design elements. 3. The design features of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan were incorporated into various sections to reflect activity center and special landscaping gOncepts. 4. General planting criteria tas included (pg. Ii1-1521 to give guidance on the appropriate use of plant materials and what should be taken into consideration in Kv it selection. Also, the use of drought tolerant p`'rnnt material has been encouraged (pg. I11-137). 5. A special! plan for "old town" Alta Lorca is called for (pg. I,, 161) with reccarmendations far features to be Considered in such a plan. This pr- wisien follows through on a SSggggestion for such a plan which is in the present document pg. III -159 of the draft update). 6. Provisions for "vista points" in the foothills are included (pg. III -174). 7. "Centers" concepts for Haven Avenues -the regional mall, and activity center intersections are included in the Pattern and Scale of Building Forms section (pg. III -178). 8. Res.dentW policies used by the Planning Commission in design review process are included throughout the element. 9. Signing criteria is introduced into the General Plan (pgs. III -189, 190) with design policies already provided in the Sign Ordinance. 10. Som;-e design standards were det4rminzd to be too specific for the General Plan. These included the plant materials list (Pg• M"135) and tree planting guidelines and standards which were deleted. Staff recommends that a design guidebook be developed for these and other specific developr,.Ant standards. In addition, it is recommended 'i.'tat work on the guidebook begin immediately after approval of the General Plan Update. A portion of the Community Design Element work was to include expaneid graphics, but staff felt it would be more appropriate to hold Off graphic p°'oduction Until the guidebook coordination work would u for the of upgradinitiated. ics n bo;hdocments is Ai PLANNING CISSIt}N STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN TECi1NICAz. UPDATE September 28, 1988 Page 5 IV. RECOMMENDATIOu: It is recommended that after puflic tFSi mo t, pu Ic ear Ag be cantinued to. the October 22, .i9g� Pia Pine Commission meeting, do .seer for the Corr�mission to have sufficient time i review the document and evaluate the testimony that has been given. Resp fully it:te d le City P anner I. 86 :LN:mlg Attachments: Draft General Plan Technical Update (under a f cover) separate CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE:. September 28, 1968 0• Chafi—r anJ members, of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofe, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SOdJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10547 WESTERN e- —subdivision of acres, ot7-Vand Into 4 parcels in e errl- Vista Planned Community located on the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista ParkwaLr (AFN 1077- 421-06, 09, 10) I. PROJEC' AND SITE _DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as s aeon on x I1xtt °B° B. Parcel Site: Parcel 1 - 5.15 Acres w Parcel 2 - 3.21 Acres l Parcel 3 - 2.E0 Acre3 Parcel 4 - 5.42 Acres C. Existing Zoning; Planned. Community - Office Park D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Residential South = Vacant East - Vacant West Commercial Center E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations. North - Reaideatial South - Community Commercial East - Office Park West - Commercial Center �1. 0�10 ITEM N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 20547 - Western Properties September 28, 1988 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes approximately 2% to the south. I1. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel M.ap is to create four (4) separate parcel s: for the four (4) office buildings which were pre3iously approved as DR 87 -08 (Exhibit "C "). The public: streets adjacent to.the site will be constructed full width to City Stardards upon the first development on the site. In addition, staff is recommending street iWrovP°-- is and landscaping for the small triangular parcel on the southear' xner of Haven Avenue and Church Street, which is conditioned to bey- ! a portion of either Parcel 1 or 2 for maintenance of the landscaping. II. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW., The ar)licant completed Part I of the Initial to . t"aff" co-du'cted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of bublic Hearing have been sent to surrounding property ownews and placed in the 001y Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is reccmnx:nded that the Planning Commission consider all iinput and � elemAnts of the 'Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recam*nd approval, then the adoption of the attached Re;oiution and issuance of a Negative Declar Lion would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, '& A)./ Barrye A. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:aS•cd Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Site Plan - DR 07 -08 (Exhibit "C ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Annroval lu rr L'��BPN d6JYJG I /�s� q� M �I- v/ s J^ G% • AAwCEL MAD i ICJ °3 MUM R CUY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENODMUM0 i. . , -Z-5, --s ,I: r� SC TENT. Fti a�:, X787 V+STA TOWN- CENT_R] rrmb PAQ.0 -F-` ft ao Mss Tn=. TENTA- 04E MAD A10Y 1 a � !�L I r Ls�� is r ,d > � s k, • 'f' r i� i CIO, a / 7 SITE PLAN [V N C- RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA., CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP NUMBER 10647 (APN 1077- 421 -06, 09, Properties, applicant, tforvthe purpose of suubbdivid 10541, submitted 4fiparcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 1077 - 421 -06, 09,10, located in the southwest corner Of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway and WHEREAS, on September 28, 1588, the Planning Commission ,held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED! AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: I. That the crap is consistent with the General Plan., 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision its consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Co- wissior, finds and certifies that the project has been revie,—we-a and considered in compliance with the California Environmental! Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Oecl ar..ti on. subject FTi" We`atta hed Standard Conditions and 10547 the following approved Conditions: 1. The existing overhead utilities (communications and olectrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the Project side: of Haven Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Town Center Drive to the first poke north of Church Street, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request a Al-6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION MO. Parcel Map 10547 September 28, 19:8 Page 2 2. 3. 4. 5. 2 reimbursement agreement to recover one -halt the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it or.curs on the opposite side of the street. The following streets shall be constructed full width for the stated limi`es upon the development of any parcel except that offs%te sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property: a. Town Center Drive from Haven Avenue to Terra Vista Parkway; b. Terra Vista Parkway from Church Street to Town Center Drive; c. Church Street from Haven Avenue to Terra Vista Parkway, including landscape madian; and d. Haven Avenue from Church Street to Town Center Drive. A master plan for the landscaping of the median within Church Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue shall be completed and approved by the City 'prior to submittal of the improvement plans to the City for review. Drainage control devices such as paved ditches,,A.C. berms or curbs shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer along Haven Avenue from Town Center Drive to the portion of the Terra Vista Master Plan Storm D,•ain tine 1 at Foothill Boulevard. The triangular parcel (APN 1077- 421 -09) on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street shall be included within either Parcel 1 or 2 and landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. Landscaping along the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel shall !e completed to the satisfaction of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, City Engineer and City Planner. 7 LZ Al- IM PLANNING �'Oi MISSION RESOLUTION NO. Parcel Ma�� 40547 September 1988 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAHCPO CUrAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman — ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secr e ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho CuCamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, ,passed, and ,dopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of +hja Planning Comission held on the 28th day of September., 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COKNISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COitlMISSIONERS: N'S ,vial POOT WOW ss-. &¢ f' iYw4 w t Nw r O�r I'd� « M✓. i V¢ K � S � k �.� 2 lot'; .+ y Y is L -% b R � im r =� w lv M M w. OcN I� Y w A 9Y[ p..�p4 w N }x 4yy 4 Y Sa1r � i }y Kf q a ✓ s z v y is PjO�7$� �pp F� Y O✓ ✓b u CN rppp Dr 4� a N; N�QE 4y� ✓g+p �� N 4 22a el � r ���► 8 tic po 4d- klL t burg Nu.. as i V `ia iC � CYWC�v� le it �✓ e av if a S.•` 4 yyy $. O� C N` '� o✓ let IOCA� $ fig O Yf N M ro ib Q W V C 1 tt •� aY �� uOiY CM � v.'$ i In C +C 1' * aG �! Mu epf O sp Y giQp���.gq �c`4 Va .`:�.oi�' �wX z'yy W ayC �R Y N E L31 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ONGA AW STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 298B j TO: Chairman and 'iemhers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT, VARIANCE 88 -19 .. WILLIAM LYON COMPANY A request to utilize ze on -s ree par ng o ees a Darkly;; requirement for a model home sales complex located on he northeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont Way in the Low - Medium Density Residential District within the Victoria Planned Community - AM 20Z-211-13 and 14.. I. ABSTRACT: The applicants is requesting a variance from the eve elo`pm`ent Code requirement for temporary off - street parking (Section 17.04.07AC7f). This section requires a minimum of two (2) off - street parking spaces per model hRare. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The requi.relment for off - street parking is consistent With f - at for any type of project (commercial, industrial, res dential, etc.) which has a demand: for parking. Although the model sales office Is a temporary use, off- street parking is still required until tine sales operation is closed in order to meet parking demand and to mitigate traffic circulation conflicts. Off - street parking also lessens the impact on future adjacent homeowners living or moving in near the sales office. B. Facts for Findin st The reasons cited by the applicant in the var once Fel xhibit "C") do not challenge the Development Code requirement for Doff- street parking. Rather, the request maintains that the proposal meets the intent of the Development Code requirement. The cost of providing the off- street parking facility is cited by the applicant as one of the main reasons for the variance request. Staff cannot make the required findings in the affirmative based upon the following facts: 1, There is ample space on surrounding lots, in particular Lots 4 or 8, that could be utilized to satisfy the requirement. ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VA88 -I9 - WILLIAM LYON =PANY September 28, 1988 Page 2 11 2. The property is similar to the other model home cample;Zes throughout the Victoria Planned Comrnunizy, including those built by the William Lyon Company, which have all fully complied -with the requirement for an off - street parking facility. For example, all four model home complexeS, bails by the William Lyon Company in the Windrows. Villagz (The Gardens, The Park, The County and The Meadows) were all built on cul -de -sac streets with no through traffic and provided: off- strtat parking. 3. No other developer has been allowed to use on- street parking within the Victoria Planned Conmaity. C. FFiin�dings; In order to approve this variance request, certain 7nf� -dings in the affirmative crust be made. Staff cannot make all of the following findings; I. That strict or literal, interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Dt- velopment Code. 2. That there are excepti ,4nal 4r~ extraordinary circumstances or cOnditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That *trice ar literal interpretatior; and znforcenent of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. a. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 5. That the granti -,g of the Variance will not be detrimental to-the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improve,;,ents in the vicinity, !_ 11 0—.2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VASa -19 - WILLIA14 LYON C0 4PANY September 28, 1988 Page 3 11 III, COMESPONDENCE: This iVA has been advertised in the Daily Report Re ort 0 p e p 1 c hc notices sG4t to al proper es within feet of subject site DA% ugg i d ie Planning ode IV. RECOME1 f theattachedResolutin. If r ehrah adoption o however* the Commission determines that the proposal is acceptable, then staff should be directed to prepare a Development Code Amd certain inent allow on street parking for model home complexes et AttachT4nts: Exhibit "A° Location Map Exhibit "D" Detailed Site Plan Exhibit AC° - Variance Request Letter Resolution of Denial September 01, 1988 Brett Rymer Planning Department City of Rancho Qicau mga P.G. Box 807 Rancho CUCanrnga, CA 91730 -11807 PROJf•=: Victrria Groves SUBJECT: K a:l Complex - Tract 13722 Dear Brett: Transmitted herewith are the requested exhibits, application and fee fon a variance for the cul-de—sac in front of the model complex for t,ae subject project to function as the model complex parking lot. As you can see fram the overall plan of the tract, as well as time actual model complex exhibit, this cul.de -sac is isolated from any through traffic. We plan to completely install the curb and gutrAV and the paving minus the crm -inch cap cn this cul-de -sac as wel as striping as irriicated for tuna required raraber of parking spaces. We feel that this arrangement more than meets tin intent of the Development requirement for "off street" parking for a sales operation from a tract development l model L.*,vlex. Tr, literally require a par!dng lot that would be off of the street front of this model estplex, caruld require re-grading of existing lots that would impose a ignJ.fieant additional, burden cf cost on this project. Additionally, there its remma te emporary pavement that would not only incur a cost for its placement, but Due to the isolated location of this model complex cul- de-sac within the project, we feel that it meets all the other necessary requirements for the findings you wi11 have to make for granting a - mriance. We will not be building houses on any other lots that front this cul- de-sac mnitil such time as we are endinp nor model complex operatics. Please understand that this does rot mean the sales o.::ratiom would be concluded, but that it would be in it's final stage which is typical to all our other sales operations where the parking lot is demolished to allow for construction of the homes in r-he model complex build -amt. We have very carefully ccnsidered the design of the model complexes and the layout of the parking lot in the cut- de-sae to best utilize thq resources of the project withhout dxtriumt to public health, safety, or welfare during our sales operation. The safety of our buyers and prospective buyers durum the sale: a quality presentation is always of operation as we'L1 as pes operations importance very The clearly ;yon Co,xnV. All of our previous model lax sales operations have very clearly derons�_?ced our cumdtment to quality at th�ghest level in cur marketing efforts. our temporary sales trailer complex at Milliken and Victoria Park lane is the most recent example of the importance we place on our sales p:wentation. We feel this is the best way to deal with the parking situation fox this sales eiPort and we l ook forward to staff support for this variance request. Please contact me for any additional information you require and to confirm a September lacaiing Commmissicn keae —g. ly, 7 lord Pro t Mies% r CUCAMONLT.ft DIVISIONj ITEMS eOA�a�id�E �8•'s TITU: REQU ST F R 1PA�OlA t:�` EXHIBIT: IT :_. C _ a E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA DRGA PLANNIW COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE NO. 88 -19 TO UTILIZE ON- STREET PARKING FOR A MODEL HOME SALES COMPLEX LOCATED ON VANDERBILT PLACE WITHIN TRACT 13722 IN ­E LOW- MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APN:, 202- 211 -33 and 14. A. Recitals. (i) Jilliam Lyon Company has filed an application fcr the issuance of the Variance No. 86 -19 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance realest is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 28, 1988 the Plannine Cor;nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolur.')n. AML NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the -facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing en September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on Vanderbilt Place, a cul -de -sac street of 13 lots. (b) The variance requests that the code requirement of six (6) off- street parking spaces be allow €, to be satisfied using on- street parking. (c) The property to the north of the subject site is future single family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of existing single family residential, the property to the east is future single family residential and the property to the west is the existing Victoria Groves Park. (d) There is ample space on surrounding) lots, in particular Lots 4 or 8, which are 6,962 square feet and 7,354 square feet in size, respectively, that could be utilised to satisfy the requirement for ofr- street parking. 0-7 PLANNING Cc'IkIMISSION RESOLUTION VA. 88 -19 - WILLIAM LYOU CO. September 28, 1988 Page 2 (e) The property is similar to the other model home complexes throughout the Vic';jria Planned Comisunity, including those built by the William Lyon Company, which have all fully complied with the requirement for an off - street parking facility.. All four model home comtplsxes built by the William Lyon Company in the Windrows Village (The Gardens, The Park, The Country and The Meadows) were all built on cul -de -sac streets with no through traffic and provided off - street parking. (f) No other developer has been allowed to use on- street parking within the Victoria Planned Community. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of '-'he specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting 67, the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitatir'..s on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies thr application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 0-59 PLANKING COMMISSIONI RESOLUTION VA, " ' :19 WILLIAMf LYOW CO, September 28, 198$ Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1988, PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry 7 cAieT° y a� rn�an ATTEST: —Tr—adl u er, ecre ary Is Brad Buller, Secretary of the ;;Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Manning Commission on the 28th day of September 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: held AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERSt ABSENT': U)MISSIONERS: I i V�� --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Septober 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the H anning Commission FROM: Brad Bulls.•, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 88 -20 - WILLI'AM LYON COMPANY - A request to utilize on-street parking to meet the parking requirement for a model home sales complex located on the west side of Benevento Place in the Low - Medium Density Residential District within the Victoria Community - APN: 227- 081 -04,, 10, and 11. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting a variance frum the Tiveevelpment Code requirement for temporary off - street parking (Section 17.04.07OC7f). This section requires a minimum of two (2) off- street parking spaces per model home. II. ANALYSIS A. General-: requirement for off - street parkin! is consistent wi �at for any type of project (commercial, industrial, residential, etc.) which has a demand for parkilig. Although the model sales office is a temporary .use, off- vI—eet parking is still required until the sales operation is closed in order to meet parking demand and to mitigate traific circulation conflicts. Off - street parking also lessens the impact on future adjacent homeowners living or moving in near the sales office. B. Facts for Findings: The reasons cited by the applicant in the variance request Exhibit "C ") do not challenge the Development Code requirement for off- street parking. Rather, the request maintains that the proposal meets the intent of the Development Code requirement. The cost of providing the off- street parking facility is cited by the applicant as one of the main reasons for the variance request. Staff cannot m;ke the required findings in the affirmative based upon the ibllowinu facts: 1. 7here is tople space on surrounding lots, in particular Lots 61, f.4 or 67 that could be utilized to satisfy the requirement. ITEM P PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT_ VA88 -20 - WILLIAM LYON C6MPANY September 28, 1988 Page 2 I s 2. The property is similar to the other model home complexes throughout the Victoria Planned Community, including those built by the William Lyon Company, which have all fully complied with the requirement for an off- street parking facility. For example, all four model home complexes built by the William Lyon Company in the Windrows Village 'The Gardens, The Park, The Country and The Meadows) were all guilt on cul -de -sac streets with no through traffic acid provided off - street parking. 3. No other developer has been allowed to use on -street parking within the Victoria Planned Community. C. Findings: In order to approve this variance request, certain findings in t a affirmative must be made. Staff onnot make all of the following findings: 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical' hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2. That' there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 5. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily Report newspaper an public hearing notices were sent to all properties within 300 feet of the subject site. /9" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VA88 -20 WILLIAM LYOM COMPANY September 28, 1988 Page 3 IV. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that th Planning Commission deny Far : ance`MT -'X- through adoption of the attached Resolution. If however, the Commission determines that the proposal is acceptable, then staff should be directed to prepare a Development Code Amendment to allow on street ,parking for model home complexes meeting certain criteria. Res idly tted, B d 8 ter %it anner BBtBH:ja Attacb�-ents: Exhibit AA" Location Map Exhibit. "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "c" _ Variance Request Letter Resolution of Denial P-3 September 01, 1988 Pratt Horner City of oWcamonga P.O. Boat 807 `'macho Q--F, CA 91730 -0807 Ptt1=: VicLvria Vineyards North SSIBJECI': Model Complex - Lracn 13445 Dear Bre,. . Transmitted hem ith are the requested exhibitor, application and fee fcr a vari" for the cul-de -sac. in front of tile model carplex for the subject Project to £ia�ctian as the model corplax parking lot. As you can see £rxn the overall plan of the tract, as well as the actual model ceaplex exhibit, this cul-de-sac is isolated from any through traffic. We plan to y -111-- lee -saw as 1L aad gutter and the paving minus the one -inch cap on this spaces. ping as indicated for the required number of parking We feel that this arrangement more than mes+ts the intent of Lhe Dev'elo t t Code requirement for "off street" parking for a sales operation from a tract develaMent model ctaplex. To literally require a parking Joe that would be off of the street in front of this model caaplex, would require re-grading of existing lots that would LTfos a Significant additional burden of cost on this project. Additionally, tiAre its rwnaoval�ttry PA t td�-- :rind not only imam a cost for its placement, but Dore to the isolated location of this model craplex cul- de-sac within the project, we fa°1 that it mecca all the other necessary ra 3irements for the firdi�s you will have to make for granting a variance. We will not be building louses on any tier lots that front this cul- de-sac until such Lime as We are anding our model operation. Please understand that this does not mean the sales complex concluded, but that it would be its ltls finals operation would of be sales operations wtrere the lot is demolis�h�d t allow foci constnection f then hones in the model coaaplex mw d-cut. We have very carefully considered the design of the model cottplexes and the layout of the parking lot in the col -de-me to best utilize the =-.•sans of the project Without detriment to public alth, safety, or telfare during our sales operation. The safety of our buyers and Prospective duye- iuricg the sales operation as we11 as a quality presentation el always of Paramount importance to The William Lyon Crnpany. All of our previars model lex sales operations have very clearly demonstrated our coccuitnent to quality at the igkn 4 le: :Tin ass marketing efforts. Out temporary sales trailer ccMlex at Milliken and Victoria Park lane, is the most recent example of the importance We place on our sales presentation. We feel this is the best way to deal with the n& situation fot this sales effort and we look forward to staff' support for the variance regjest. ?lease e Plat in for Hearing. fo=ti_n you require and to conti m a Se tenbe Plaraling �� Rect 11y, , Ford Pro act Manager I OF �� � -1t ITEM: VAR <ANCE 88 a,l PL ICHO C UCAMO G TITI.E: RE uESr FOB VARIANCE - NI C DIVISION P� EXHIBIT: --Q-- 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIC41 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DEN. 11..", VA,IIANCE NO. 88 -20 TO UTILIZE ON- STREET PAWING FOR A MODEL HOME SALES COMPLEX LOCATED ON BENEVENTO PLACE WITHIN TRACT 13446 IN THE LOW - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT - APR: 22 7-081 -4,10, and 11. A. Recitals. (i) William Lyon Company has filed an ®pplication for the issuance of the Variance No. 88 -20 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred tows "the application ". (ii) On September 28, 1988 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly aoticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing ,in that data. (iii) All legal prerequisites to he adoption of this esolution have occurred. 9. Rasolution. is NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved h, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc&ncnga as follows: 1. . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts . set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution e^e true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Comission during the above - referenced public hearing on SetemKgr 28, 1988, in:luding written and oral staff reports, together with ; blic testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application appiias to property located an Benevento Place, a cul-de-sac street of 11 lots. ;b) The variance requests that the code requirement of e;ght. (8) off - street parking spaces be allowed to be satisfied using on- street parking. (c) The property tea the north of the subject site is future a proposed high school site, the property to the south of that site consists of future single family residential, the property to the east is future single family residential and the groper +,y to the west is a proposed park site. (d) Thare is ample sp.se on surr4,inding Tots, in particular Lots 61, 66 or 67, which are 3,640 square feet, 4,744 square feet, and 4, 480 square feet in size, respectsaely, that could be utilized to satisfy the requirement for off- street parking. P -7 pL RNING C"I$sION RL:SOLuTIoN No, VA 88 -20, WILLIAM LYON CUPANY SeptembE, 28, 1988 Page 2 (e) The ;property is similar to the ether model home complexes throughout the Victoria Funned Community, including those built by the William Lyon Company, which have all fully complied with the requirement for an off - street parking facility. All four model home complexes built by the William Lyon Company in the Windrow8 'tillage (The Gardens, The Park The Country and The d)eadows) were all built on cul -de -sac streets with n) th_ rough traffic and provided off - street parking. (f} No other daveloner has been allowed to use on- street parking within the Victoria Flanncd Community. upon e hearing oohp to this the above-referenced public evidence andupn e efc fiingsof facts set forth °n paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds znd concludes as follows: (a) That strict or lip -ral interpretation and enforcement of the spec fied regulation would not result in practical O fficulty or unnecessa -y physical hardship inconsistent With the objectives of the bevel epment Code. (b! That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to ahe property involved or to the intended use of the property that Ito not apply generally to other properties in thtF same district. (c) ''hat strict �,-r literal intr. ° +retation and enforcement of the specified regulation tiould not r deprive the applicant of privtl r> Enjoyed by he owners of other properties in tha ,ume district. (d) That the granting of the Variance wi Z constitute a grant of special privilege incns;stent with the limitations on other proper "es classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will be dcrimental to the public health, saf;.ty, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. 8ase� Upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5, the Secretary to thi, Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. rl PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VA 88 -20 WILLIAM LYON COMPANY September 28, 1988 Page 3 APPR0VED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1988. PLANNING C?LKMiSSION OF THE CITY - OF RANCHO CUZIA!iONGA BY: ar�'i. KcNiel , Chai rman ATTEST- Brad e9rerce1ay` I, : Brad Buliel. Secretary of the Planning Commiss n¢i of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify th4t the foregoing Resolution. wai duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cormnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28t', day of Se,Z4ber 1988, by the following vote- to -ws':: AYES: COMMISSIORERS: NOES: COWISSIONERSc ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I 0 i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: !,OBJECT: cITY 0Y RANC0 CUCAMGNGA STAFF REPOR September 28, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Plann ^r Dan Col MV, senior Planner EHTERTAIWEAT PERMIT 88 -01 - HARRY C'S A request to col ive come ac s, spor s ce a .1 s and chperle, -sync contests, hai,' and clothing promoting sports teams, lip fashion shows, Miss Hawaiian Trop uoingavocalsgandtplaying request to continue "disc jockey located nightly iFooth 1 r 1 8ouleva h a restaurant /night ctub, T_ ABSTRACT: The applicant is applying for a new entertainment per"it a variety of entertainment uses not permitted under his cur ent permit. ii. BACKGROUND: Since 3,387, Harry C's has operated under . 4, iforna e'87 =01 rirtisb wss approved by the Planning Cc disc ,jockey doing vocals and playing records niglt&(Y from 8 :00 p.n till 2:00 a.m." Over several months: a number of problems, disturbances, and violations occcsrrra at harry cis which resulted in roview by both thA Public Safety �;flrtenission and she Planning Commission in June and July of 1988- to July 13, 1988, the ?:at?'1 g Commission held a hearing t. considL-r two requests: to 1, Recomma t'ion of the Comir oi keep nthe modify the conditions of app= scope of entertairtn -%t restricted; and R. Applicitior by Harry C's to allow an expansion of the scope cf entertainme-t. After a ngi.Ay d lberation, tho Planning Wmissicn etcii?ed to that the revoke tae entOrta µl _,, t ii,o ncontinueatiiedcurrentiy appro eci applicant r.• 120 days o demonstrate abili�y to enter �. tai +Ste conditions of approval and in a operate in coot yo the peace, health, sz.ety and manner that is ar.. The Comm ;ssion also added the general :�elfare of yf,. , foiloviing s�oaditions: _ -�- ITEM Q ALAUNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE! 1NTERTAINMENT PERMIT 88 -01 -IRRY C'S September 28, 1988 Page 2 _I i J J 1. No expansion of the entertainment permit is al l owee. ?• A minliaum of twa uniformed, licensed security guards. 8. A hearing, should be set 12C days later to further conside° modificatifJn, suspension, or revocation 7f Entertainsment Pormit 87 -01. 1'his decision was apaeal.�d to the City Cot:ncil by :bee F.pplicant. On August 17, 1988, the City Council conducted a hearing and uphel the Planning C•-. {ssion' J s action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission not con ° e3 r a'7w expansic;i of entertainment use until the 129 days is complete. Therefore, it is recommen,!ed that the Commission continue this item to November 23, 1888. ":,wever, should the Planning Commission find that the applicant has ,operated in Mr;formdnce with the conditions of approval of the original enter ,", Ament permit, and in a manner that is not contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public, the Commission .may reconsider its action to table this matter for 120 days and conf'der the ,oplicant °s "new" request at tr±is time.. Re %cly smab tted, � L Bra"Trl ler Cat} Planner BB:DC:ko Att&,hments: Resolution No. 89 -143 Planning f"or,7mission Minutes of July iS, 1988 i { City of Rancho a Cucamonga Uniform Application PART I APN FILE NO. j LOCATION OF PROJECT (ADDRES51��$7� RELATED FILES NAME OF PROPOSED PROJECT/ {�/ �Q� ,y � APPLICANT'SNAME h TELEPHONE i HariN CIS 'aurant ADDRESS 1 10877 E Foothll Blv. Rancho camoacra Ca. GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED t. OWNER'S NAME TELEPHONE -HW (. CIS Inc_ r v Fi Chan 17141 980 0799 AODHESS 1414 University_Ava Ric idp a 501 DEYE. DISTRICT GENERAL PLAN EXISTING LAND USE _ SITE ACREAGE EXISTING STPUC14JRESQUA9E FOOTAGE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SQUARE FOOTAGE REVIEW REQUESTED - -' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* G TECHNICAL/DESIGN REVIEW — R CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — ° COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL* NON CONSTRUCTION* L: TECHNICALIDESIGN REVIEW — D tEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT RESIDENTIAL* D (ZONE CH.-,.'GL; E TOTAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT = BASIC STANDARDS ! _� MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OPTIONAL. STANDARDS CUSTOM LOT /SUBDIVISION MINOR EXCEPTION ;= DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY REVIEW* )e ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT I It is mandatory to complete Part t & 11 0; he Uniform APPlIcation PROJECT DESCRIPTION ' FULL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT VTTACH ADDITION_ SHEE751✓ NECESSARY) Proposed Promotions- Sae attar' _ t OWNER CERTIFICATION I CERTIFY THAT l AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACI- ORATE. AGENT OF OWNER MUST ATTACH A LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FROM THE LEGAL OWNER. f i DATE__ B-21 88 SIGNATURE: rL PRINT NAME & TITLE: C A 1Nft s t �gs.�tveu nr rl., _ '— EES RECE�:e Yi tom" S T E A K ♦ 5 E A F Q O D O P R I M E R 1 �wmI i Harry C'S Rancho Cucumonga Proposed Protmtions Sunday -9:00 P.M. Live stand up comedy, two or three "professional comedians that perform live dialogue on stage, theso comedians have appeared such places as the Taff Stop candy St)re etfc. The show is set up thru a professional talent agcy call Farrah productions mat of Colton. Time of the shag is approximately 90 minutes. Monday -5:00 - 6 :00 p.m. start Monday Nite Fwtball,also we would t tie in halftime and after the game apcearances of sports celebrities or professional: football team cheerleader and college cheerleaders promoting their teams schedule. Tuesday 11 :30 P.14. A professional L1rp Sync Contrat, similiar to the nationally known T.V. show " Puttin on The tits ". Entertainers mock sing to their favorite music f Wednesday -8:00 P.M. start a fashion night. Harry O'S runs hair &id clothing fashion shows. CcmmmAty inxiolvement and teamwork is stressed on this evening as Harry C'S get local mer(- %an:.s involved sn pronoti.ng their business by supplying zodels and clothing. L Thursday- 11:30- Miss Hawaiin Tropic E -auty Pageant, tie -in with nationally known sun care and swimwear company. A professional, j- tactfully cc kiucted swimsuit contest that feature many professional s models. Grand prize to include placement in F'ace.4 17,ternational c( Talent and marketing magazineland also a six week commercial r- mode workshop. This pageant has appeal to females as well as males because they have a chance to see the latest swimsuit attire being modeied. V-s . 801 Trii City Center Drive - -I Redlands, California 92379 a 714 792.8160 r ! RESOLUTION No. 88 -143 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING commrs ION ev THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, P.WIFYING ENTERTAINMEMT PERMIT 87 -01 FOR HARRY C'S 3ESTAiRANT /NIGHTCLUB LOCATED AT 10877 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD A. Recitals. (i) On June 24, 1987, this Camit sion adopted its Resolution No. 87 102, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, vt�als for dancing in the Harry C's Restaurant on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue. A true and complete copy of said Resolution is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by this reference. On June 7, 1988, the Public Safety Eomission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga publicly conducted a hearing °o review the reports of law enforcement, fire safety, and related public safety problems and reports of expansion of the scope of gntertainment beyond that approved by this Gwmissis and recommended that additional conditions of operation be imposed on Entertainment Permit No. 8� -01. A true and complete copy of the Public Safety Commission findings are attaches+ hereto as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by this refc-rence. MO On June 24, 1988, Harry H. Chan applied for an annual renewal of the Entertainment Permit, as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 5.12.110, which included a request for expansion of the nature and scope of the entertalnmeZt. (iv) On July 13, 1988, this CorMission conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing to determine whether substantial evidence existed to support revocation, of Entertainment Permit No. 87 -01. occurred. (y) All legal prerequisites to the adopt on of this Resolution have B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planaing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucam aga as follows.- 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fortis in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence, including written staff reports and further testimonial Evidence presented by the Sheriff's Department and Fbothill Fire Protection District during the public hearing described in paragraph A. (iv), above, this Cammission specifically finds that violations o Macho Cucamonga s Municipal pal1CodeoSect;onn5 12 100, subsectioy.s0(21Yy(4)�� and (5), znd violations of Rancho Cucamaiga Munic'-31 Code Section 3.36.050 have occurrad since the edopticn of Planning CM., ission Resolution No. 87 -1'02 cantraq to the peace, hea—.-h. safety and general welfare of the public_ a E Ja1y 27, 1983 rage 2 3. Based upon violations identified above, this Commission declines to revolve Entertainment Permit ha. 87 -01 however, in order to insure future compliance with the conditions any City regulations identified in paragraph 2, above, this Commission hereby modifies Entertaiiment Permit No. 57-01 by adding the following conditions: a. The Secretary of this Commission is he -eby dirf.ted to set a public hearing for a regular meeting of the Commission, approxir.tely 1 %iS,days after the date of adoption of this Resolution, to further consider mod4fication, suspension, or revocation of Erntertainment Permio; No. 87-01• At sucli time, this Commission shall review the operation of ;hoe permittee's conditions of approval and all other City regula iong. d co ;tsistsnt with the b. No expansion of the entertainment permit is allowed. c. A minimum of two uniformed, duly licensed and regularly employed security guards from a reputable security firm shall be required to be on the premises from sunsa t until two hours after the cessation of any entertainment. At least, Dne of said guards to be and remair on duty in the parking and outside adjacent areas of the facility. 4. This Commission further finds that all conditions previously imposed by Entertainment Permit No. 87 -01, and Planning Commission Resolution. No. 87 -102, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", shall continue in all respects and with full force and effect. 5. The Secretary of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROViD AND ADOPTED THIS 2711H DAY Or JULY, 1988- PLANNING Comm SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCX-",uXGA BY: ATTEST: I, Brad Huller, Deputy Secretary of the Plannins Commission of 'the City of Rancho rucamonga, do hereby certify that L'oe foregoing Resolution bras duly and regula, -f introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ra;izho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cotnrission held on the 27th day of July, 1988, by the following vota -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: C"ISSIMNERS: ABSTAIN: COMMiSSYMERs: CHITIEA, HLAKESLEY NONE EMERI,K, TOLSTOY MMITFt i E. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -01 - HARRY C'S - A consideration to m °diiyj suspen or revo a an en �emr granted fa: ¢ disc jockey dgirg voce ?s, ect play, show, dance contest, band, iaauty contest in conjunction wfth a restaurant /nightclub, located at 10877 Foothill Boulevard. Otto Krnutil, Deputy City Planner, presented the staff report. He outlined the options available to the Commission. Vice - Chairman Chiti'ea opened the public hearing. Harry Histen, ?666 University Avenue, Riverside, Calif'cirnia, attorney for the applicant, presented a written report outlining the applicant's position on this matter. He advised that notice and receipt of the public Safety hearing was so short he was unable to properly prepare for th resting, He did not feel there was a real fire situation at the restaurant and stated that the applicant had done everything to comply with the wishes of the Fthe District. He. referred to the recent violations issued i the t=ire district and stated that he did not believe therA was a fire situation relative to the capopy erected Mother's Day since he t.4lieved the canopy was less that 200 feet. He stated that the other notice of violation was issued at 3:30 p.m. when the restaurant was closed and the cleaning crew had moved a table in front of the door to buff the floor. Dill Thaws, Fire Consultant based in San Diego, advised that ne Wls contacted by-Harr, Chan at the request -of Fire Department to resolve a problem a1 -4h t,€ number of exits and occupant load for Harr -,, C's. He stated he made a full I asses At of the restaurant and devised an exiting plan with four exits to meet the needs of the fire department and operational needs of Harry C`a. He stated that Harry Cs has twice the required number of exits legally req;�irtd for the occupancy load and believed all life safety concerns were more than adequately met. He considered the routine violations issued by the Fire District to be cormonplace in this type of business. Jim Barton, 10621 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, asked far an Opportunity to address the Commission at the eonclusian ar the Fire District's and Sheriff's Depariarent presentation. Ralph Crane, Foothill Fire District, presented an addendum 10 the Comnissior report which outlined recent violations. He noted that tt.e position of Une Fire District is not to shut down a profitable business In tf:e City but to ensure the saf_ty of the peopl° using the facility. He advised fihat the: Fire District would prepare a formal response to Mr. HisteHe dviied utter. He stated the Fire District's concern with Harry C's Is one of public safety and maintaining the built c rifle protection system. Slides were presented by the Fire District depicting violations at Harry C's. He advised they would not support zu expansion of the use until it's proven tha'. the management of Harry C's cat take care of the current situation. Ke suppL ,ted extension of the current perm. it t20 days to monitor the situation. t Plalnfrq Conanissior, e6_ July 13, 1 88 Commissioner Emerick questioned the additional amount of stff tUe to bran Harry C's into coda enforcement over a typical r restaurant that might be more t AOL in excess of what would be Vice4hairman Chitiea asked if more violations occurred in correlation w with Mr. Crane pointed out attract people. that the reason for the enta,�:ainment permit is to i i risk is highest. Commissioner Talsta (\)P9 V (T Vice-Chairman parking Chitiea asked king lot. if there were any problems after hours In the Aah .par Lt. Peppler advised that there were problems in the uniformed security guards now stay in the parking lot until P�st; however, the t clears out. � Mr. Chan referred to the Fire District's slide presentation aid stated that no of the large crowds. restaurant in the entire City would pass inspection for Mother's Day because Vice- Chitiea asked if taaere were not other places the items blocking a ;Its could have been stored away from the exits. Mr. Chan stated they could and would do a mr.ch better Job next year. Jim Barton stated that the fare life safety of this facility far surpasses any realistic fire code requirement of any facility in Rancho Cucamonga. He advised that Mr. Chan had cooperated fully with the :"ire Dfatrict. He referred to the instance of the ash tray size fire and stated the staff of Hart' C s is knowledgable of what to do in thAt situation, therefore, the situation was handled before the district had to be called. Mr. Thows re- emphasized that` the facility meets fire safety more- than adequately, but concurred that this systa must tQ maintained'. He advised that he would work with Mr. b'han on the maintervince of the system to assure that the instances reported vsuld not re,,`ccur. Hr. Hitten reviewed the criteria for denying an entertainment permit and did not feel any of those criteria could be established. There were no further comments, tht:refore the public hearing was closed. Coamissioner Emerick stated his original position was one b wever, it now seems '-here is a system tie pattern of noncng Oftttevofaa `l; of Sall problems. He believed most of the applicant's efforts as reactive :dm be wants something additional from the City and not one of compliance with Sment.andHe awas concerned with the amount of Fire District, Sheriff - expended .on, Harry,: C s.. - He supported the impleomb.tion of the uniformed security guards in the parking lot. He belied the hours of operation should reimin the same and not be limited. He did not support an expansion of the entertainment permit and suggested that the me be reviewed again by the Commissian in 6 months to assure, that the arrplica®t can Comply over a longer period of time. Comdcsiones Blakesley stated his greatest concern was public safety. If the only v1dation occurred at times Of heavy occupancy when there is the greatest risk, 1 considered it unpardmiable. He stated that if every \lime a situation of omcrawding occurs, exits are blocked then it doesn't matter how sophisticated the fire protection is if its defeated,. He was concerned that age00:2S seem to have to co far boyond what they s!iould in order to get ecvli=e !nd was concerried with the attitude ape -esponsiveness of the applicWt. He pointed out iii t the COL'nrission dis,;ussed uniformed security Plams2 Caa;ission Minutes -8- al July 13, 1988 !C" guards during the original review of this request, but ix� applicant was Ath convincing that the plain clothes guard approach Wild be just as effective. He concurred that the uniformed security guard is a ,yod solvtian. He did not consider limiting the hours of operation to be viah ?e and ,)elieved 120 drys would be long enough to get an idea of whether the ;tpplicEnt $ustifies public trust. gn response to Ar. Hastens coglaint eelat4ve to the short notice; of the hearing, he stated that the City has Laen worMg on rnis for Is months with notification to the applicant occurring all along. He concurred that the requested expansion of aria entertainwent pa,,wit should not be allowed Lntii the applicant addresses the pr.V ens that currently exist. He advised that an expansion w4 be considered at a later date, but not to the kxt nt requested. Commissioner Tolstoy, stated he was mainly concerned with public safety and fire and lc �en:orcement problems that have "furred. He agreed That fire safety violat.ons cannot be exCased. He felt that it: was unfortunate that it into revocation concurred the .ems to of the be a lack a ccope ationpanithe part of Harry C's staff. lie considered the two uniformmed security guards in the parking lot to be a necessary requireAeent. Ye felt the hours or should rr ain as currently permitted and agree4! the use should �- .,geed consideredlat a�later, date stated he would when Very cdens of of the, what kinds of activities will be expended: He was urtcowfortable ofth the range of items rewested in the expansion request. Vice- Chairman Chitiea concurred and felt the fire safety violation on Nother's Bay was a flagrant violation. She pointed out that it doesn't matter how good. the alarm system is if people cWt get out of the building. Z,e considered' the violence and disruption in the parking toy very serious, and if t'e situation could be brought into control with uniformed guards she Wt it was an appropriate requiremert as well as continuing non- uniformed enforcement inside the facility. Since neither the Fire District nor the Sheriff's Warteent considered the hours of operation as being a problem. she accepted the operating hours as currently allowed at this time unless a pattern establishes itself in the future. She stated she would not consider an expansion of uses until the current problems are resolved and con:.srred she k.jld be very careful of the range. of uses ftuich might be considered in the future.- She -felt-it was unfortunate that it. took the pressure of possihle revocation' to bring the landscaping and admission tax into: c mpliance. She supported the 123 day tic! period for review. Crissioder Slakesley asked f there -as a public safety iolai ;ion prior to the 120 day review period, -ould the tteM be broagimt defare the Commission sooner? Mr. Croutil advised that it could be brought back sooner than 120 days if obvious problems occur. 2 fPlaraing C0Wission Minutes -9- July 13, 1983 r t MotIOn: Moved by Blakesley seconded by Tolstoy, unanimously carried that a Minimum or t1O unfformed guard should be required, the hours of operation could remain as currently established, time permit should be reviewed aasin by the Coamis;.ion in 120 days, and that no expansion of the this time. Staff was directed to prepare a Resolution to be placed on the July 27, 1988 Plannin Ae fit be all;mwed at entertainment permit .irge toobbe$sidenticaldto those on inajly relative pproved, except as stated above. Commissioer Blakesley commented that in spite of his negative coarients on this issue, he is excited about having this establishment in Rancho Cucaru,rnga9 He felt if all iteAs were brought into compliance abl m and proanch maintained, Harry C's would F.e a welcomed addition to the an ** . OfflROOE"AL ASSESSlgE,iT AHD ETIWAHDA SPECIFIC PLAN MEWHUT 38-03 - CITY c a rPques o amen urt - n per g n o P inq to C e "wan ommunii<y Trails. fcott Murp Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Vice- Mairman Ch iea opened the public hearing. Patrick McGuire, Et nda resident, questioned the necessity o" trails on Etiwanda Anenu° and th acing of 400 yards to this new trail. He felt they should be placed in a one ile span. He believed that even though the t were designates Co aaunit iIs, they were actually horse trails const they ructed I for the use of a small minorit of citizens. There were no further. comments, th fore the public hearing was closed. Vice- Chairmn Chitiea Mspoitded the McGuire °s comments relative to the trails and explained they are carmunity its for use b walk or log as well as people who ride Fors Y People who like to C0111Mi-do6er Tolstoy stated he-always fei+ that trail along ast Avenue is a bad•idea because of the proj::cted traffic. He concerned with the trail crossing residential streets, and felt the crossing should receive special Pavement treatment as well as proper signing, partic rly where the trail crosses sidewalks. Commissioner Blakesley agrees and stated as long as this is and can be maintained by the City he would support the placement, nity train ComissSme# Emerick concurred with moving the trail off E t A s Avenue t wa apposed to replacing it with two alternate trails. Ne realized en erg was Of those silo favor more equestrian trails that it keeps the commulity open d gives CL-racter to the commudity; however, could not support replacement oche tl•.am on a one for one basis based on the actual number of trail users in the city. PlaWr'g Coornission Minutes 'I0° Jv•y 13, 1983 a-1 t — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC-A Svc n^t saw STAFF REPORT ��Ql 0 F� UI DATE: September 28, 198° 1977 TO: Chairman anu MW4ers of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY. Betty A. Miller, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: dHVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AAD TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11685 subdivision o acres o an nto parcels n `ne 'Lew Residential Devolopment District, located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue (APN 208 - 851 -09 and 10) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re guested: Approval of the -Nosed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on x t ` B" S. Par:-el Size: Parcel 1 - 8,816 S.F. Parcel 2 8,883 S.F. Parcel 3 7,770 S.F. 23;W; (0.58 acres) C. Existing Zoning:. Low Residential D. Surroundir. Land Use: orth- single Family Residential South - Multi- Ftoily Residential East - Vacant West - Single Fanily Resident 31 E. Surroundinq General Plan and Development C-36a Designations: �ur:r - oL w— Resiei aT-- South - Medium Residential ' East - Foothill Specific Plan, Subarea 3 Law - Medium Residential West -Low Residential ITEM R TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP 11685 0=:t ,))er S, 1988 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics. The site is vacant and slopes to the sOuth.. "It—T oounnds.1 by Devon Street on the north, which has no curb and gutter on the south si#G, There are existing block walls on the east and south property lines and a wood fence on the west. II. ANALYSIS: Tho purpose of this Parcel. Mrp is to create three (3) single famitiy residential lots. (Exhibit "8 "). The Parcel ft is a resubmittal of an expired Tecttative Parcel Map (TPM 7810 which was conditionally approved on March 9, 1983, it consists of the final two lots of Tract 9337 and the uniwiaroved portion of Ki77eck. Avenue south of Devon Street (Exhibit "A "T. The public street (Devon) adjacent to the parcel map is partially complote. This developer is required to r&construct the Devon and Kinlock intersection, so as to remove two existing crass gutters, and to complete the street and parkway improvements op the south side of ievon Street. The Parcel Map assumes the vacation of Kiniock Avenue south of Devon Street, sine it is not needed for access to completed Tract 12044 to the south. The developer is rgquK*d vlo extend end p6ssib7y upgrade the existing store ;train on the basil. -of,s final drainage '.tudy. III. ENVIRONn'SNTAL REVIEW: The applicant ccmp,etad Part I of the Ittit:al u a cone cted a field investie.40 n and completed Part II of the Stody. No adverse iMacts, Upon the environment, are anticipated as.- result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. CORRESPONFRi, - Notices of Public bearing have been sent to surrounding pr0Reri,, �,s and �%ced in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has ai been =ipleted. % -2_ 1] 0701 --02 ' o 9-28 -88 PG % aenda 4 of 5 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11685 October 5, 1988 Page 3 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Plarning Commission consider all input and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then t.3 adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, [ Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:BAM:jmb Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Conceptual •,rading Plan (Exhibit "C ") Resolution �s9'' Recotwmn4,d Conditions of Approval � R -3 a ' F X. �.� ®�Y as �T @•e 2e�3mLS�at'b'it 5ie ti {j.. MALVEAUV av a 4► Ei 3^ ati. �� '� .ryi ti. n h aw .. rraT � �•�s+ --r _t . $ al + !•ir V0 :•i Zi4'.=•y ,�' �J��. 4. : VI a R -y �3nN3+W ail A VEN pW m � O CL ,,fi�e• a s ~ ii• � a Jr z top a Q O A • Ul V J, a ' F X. �.� ®�Y as �T @•e 2e�3mLS�at'b'it 5ie ti {j.. MALVEAUV av a 4► Ei 3^ ati. �� '� .ryi ti. n h aw .. rraT � �•�s+ --r _t . $ al + !•ir V0 :•i Zi4'.=•y ,�' �J��. 4. : VI a R -y u ' q � Lill Pull O2QO �Q�y odd � CNy� •`�w�w++�to•✓� t-_ 2,a,u A""'_- -••,fir •tea ,oa nt r" tr.. �4 a ...t • o • ^Vt� l s f� Ai I1 el 4-H�7. e al 1 el R—� spow— - z 406. J w V 46) LN, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSICN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11685 hi.FREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11685, submitted by James O'Brien, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamongga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 208'- SIM-09 and 10, located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described crap. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECT.DN 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improver nt of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11685 is hereby approved subject to t attached Standard Conditions and the fallowing Special Conditions: 1. The Devon/Kinlock intersection shall be reconstructed to eliminate the existing north /south cross gutters, which will require the installation of catch basins on the north side of the intersection and the extention of the storm drain connector pipe, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. The existing storm drain serving the Devon /Kinlock intersection may require reconstruction depending upon the results of the Final Drainage Study. 1z�7 i i ` 3. The storm drainage easement within Parcel 2 shall be graded to direct overflows from the Devon /Kinlock intersection sump condition to existing overflow facilities along the —south property Tine. 4. Approval of the Final Map shall be contingent upon the y,ompletion 'of appropriate street vacation rocee nlock Avenue south of Devon Street to the north property line or of Tract 12040. IZ,,PROYED AND ADOPTED THIS 'DAY 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 198$, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDHGA BY: Larry T. Ofel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad u er, ecrerary I, Brad Buller, Secretary- of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was= duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted. by the Planning Connission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the P1;,nning L'oaassion held on the 28th day of September. 1988, by the _following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E E �i 0 a a. c u >o Q a i ° 0 v �y 1.1 "'�I _ C L �N �E N a0a' •• oe yg. i 5 CA nf .`$ YCr =yw L L. ur. '. O. Zi 'a w.s �� ° a c ° a& ° + `y°a. _ R= $� w= s a` =��$ w rb ti V •. .a • «.�� wp off VV u i q 360. e"r ri •�. .nom Ho •• qiS oY o 8,,, � o e, iw;Y b° g$ gS _ d pp g�` � Z S� a C �$. Y L Yd OZ p= O �• • y w s+ t L C w 8p S $ tiC V-s uip.� ■rCg9 ^•■ gV. ~^ L�kLia via `o O Y Ni Y a A iY 6 N V• h O � ti • A Y� I I �N �E N CA r ,X iz V� g L N iw;Y b° g$ gS pp � Z S� a C �$. • € V C L Yd OZ O �• L � gY � °L QQQ V = �. 8p S $ uip.� ■rCg9 ^•■ gV. ~^ O Y Ni Y A m • A Y� I I YL e9f L i` KV I V P� pM C �Z N cH w Oil 1 oil N Im QGO "S nor VQ�OU% ' ✓Y 9e zz t GJ p1 W V� 'LYL -oo na te Nis" a a$Y -_ NC YSI V 1 �CyG6 uu G M Y i 2.9 GA Ofd1 .y■ V wY� wb� ywL g r N C OO eue .570 Y W u V Y tC t S b 5,1 O.�}{ !+� ice« ..YG.N ;-.A A A -GYpp Y K c - S i If3 hLl+ �« C y-t N eye 30! iars m 1 dl V A I I y r •� O L Y � � C S y ' • Y V yy fl s =o by -« � -. oE C ^ 1� Y O Y +p pp i'I + x S �s C is o O� u au « �Y L� +Y ^ PY SLi A�g o • C •�� {y!` CAL Y b elC Om = p�� .ZC LG. �� � yyl $yy c Y ¢ML N CN y.4 OC YC— QCp� �, >O y �.. r2 pLL aS , �� 1� S �•- EL, fig« a g`o Sy� '�' °° LJyY e� �o �e� �� �_ �w a`, q • L =.V t� ep. ■p. �' 6 O ;t IYOL Dp u 1� L >�O� ■(r. C — ` NNC pr$e yQ` � .i ` tN. r � �u0 LL�6 K�PO 6=Y N C N 11• 4 N O' N Im CITY" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROK4ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERM 61, 40 1 1115 111 I eve oilmen o a s er an or a urc consisting of a sanctuary, achinistration building, education /nursery building, and Family Center on 8.5 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Carrari Street and Hillside Road, APP: 201 - 101 -25 RELATED FILE: CONDITIONAL USE 11IT 89 -38 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIrTION: A. Action Requested Approval of the Master Site Plan, Conceptual Wad ng a ,"'conceptual Landscape Man, building elevations and issu,nce of a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundin Land i and Zoning: North Vacant; Very Low Residential District (less than 2 South - SinglenFamily =Resident al; Very Low Residential East - Single Family Residential; Very Low $Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). West Vacant., Very Low Residential District (less than t dwelling units per acre). C. General Plan t nicians• Project Site - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). North - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). So:sth - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). East - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). ITEM S 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -10 - HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH September 28, 1988 Page 2 11 West - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). D. Site Characteristics: Currently existing on the site are three temporary mo u ar u ldings which occupy approximately 11,520 square feet and Parking Lot A, consisting of 100 spaces. The remaining portion of the site slopes at approximately 8 percent from north to south. E. Parking Calculations: Type Number of Parking Spaces Number of SE,dces of Use Ratio Required Provided Church (Existing) 1 per each 88 4 fixed seats 100 Modular- (350 seats to- Phase 1) Church "Proposed 1 per each 375 4 fixed 378 (upon *' (1,500 seats completion ria�l upon completion of Phase of Phase IV IV) II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The Hillside Community Church was previously approve y the Planning Commission on February 9, 1982 by Conditional Use Permit 82 -29. The project currently before the Commission is i4entical to that which was previously approved except for the design of the sanctuary. Currently existing on the site are three temporary modular buildings which occupy approximately 11,000 square feet and Parking Lot A consisting of 100 spaces. These buildings constitute a portion of Phase I which was granted approval by the previous Conditional Use Permit mentioned above. B. General: The project is proposed to be completed in four P ases see Exhibit "A"). Phase I has been completed as noted above except for the construction of the game fields in the southwestern portion of the site and the Family Center building. The existing temporary modular buildings are proposed to be remo,:d upon completion of the Family Center buildings. The g-- field area will also be the site of 125 unpaved parking spaces when completed. PLANN1? T,2i C"ISSIUN STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 88 -10 - H4LSIDE CDWUNITY CHURCH September 28, 1988 Page 3 Phase 11 will consist of the nursery, and one of the Christian Education buildings. Phase III will consist of the remaining Christian Education buildings and the Administration building. phase IV will consist of the se- ctuary and Pariing Lot 8 (125 spaces). (See Exhibit "A "). The sanctuary building will have a seating capacity of 1,500 and upon completion 375 parking spaces will be available. C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Kroutil, ea, mer cc "Tin Mally reviewed the project on duly 21, 1988. The original proposal reviewed by the Committee was identical to that which was approved by the plarging Commission on February 9, 1982. At this time, the Committee did not approve the project due to concerns regarding: 1.) Proposed seamed metal root material and its compatibility with Existing single family residential neighborhoods. 2.) The architectural design of the sanctuary. 3.) The height of the sanctuary (50 feet) and its relationship to existing single family residential neighborhoods. The applicant then revised the architecture of the sanctua�v building and reduced trm !"ssght of the roof to 35 feet. The Design proje:t on September 8,n1988aand approved it subject to he the following conditions which have been included in the attached Resolution. 1,) A tile roof material is to be provided. 2.) Staff was directed to work with the applicant regarding color selection of the roof tile, which is to be presented to the full Commission. D. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project culu determined a witn the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been COMP- e e y e app cent. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. ,t PLANNING COi MISSIOn+- 'STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -10 - KILLSIDE C"UNITY CHURCH September 28, 1988 Page 4 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development o e an he General Plan, and will not be detrlr,, -ntal to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use and building design, together with recommended conditions of approval,, are in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Development Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public ;tearing in the a e ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all proper y-owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATIOK: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve o- n- diianal Use Permit 88 -10, subject to all conditions of approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Da•;laration. ARes ly s ted, er BB:BN:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Master Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Building Elevations Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions r3l �A VI!5*rA m;wq§r_lL___rXNW® lit tit • 17 13,11� t&t, lk rVeWOAL OpAa'( 5 0 fhawl) i APmwitiMA11w (Vhat7an) CITY CF R A NU4_) C LrA M @ DNGA MWNING UVEM nTm. —C,,OQL? TnU: EXHiwr.--A SCALE- ---. .5-5 11, w KFIR "- Adminivtrai " CITY c JF 6i �-.WRXNCHo CLUAINIONGA MEM S'UY fop -(a TrrLE: EXHFTr.. `Z SCALE. S'7 s Y� Y 4. r•1 /aA '1�1����•� V •i �yrjnr� I n s Adminivtrai " CITY c JF 6i �-.WRXNCHo CLUAINIONGA MEM S'UY fop -(a TrrLE: EXHFTr.. `Z SCALE. S'7 n ` Id ial p till a�-r i 2 CITY •: RANCHO CLJCAIMO ' N.T.- (Alli!. r NORTH ITEM- TrIU: SCALE: DQ entiT iR:se wR a't•o M c.tt 4 lwbb a�wptic, WRT wfdpdi TKW;C¢W.. Pa4r -i , cA Z r. 0 fir -b ..Tr 4 -+ r *rm I E.ew.ew 1� C= ° n-4Ko. nst.pyg T4. wXT'C+.. A=4Ts; TRe: v..g vug ma:. -rd TRM ;RAN,, NL ev4 u.cbJ tfarls.+ Tmicft--me CM4 rc;%m OwR g4R1A6 —mT{ " TRL° Y Tug TuW' ....+ uPme.Vwb,tGO aur.ww .0 -W& Mw s-(F Ti o .--= gage cQ Jd, w.u.T 6tia.b w T � CITY •: RANCHO CLJCAIMO ' N.T.- (Alli!. r NORTH ITEM- TrIU: SCALE: n RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RA]MCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CCMMISSION p, "PR'OYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -10, AND DESIGN REVItEW THEREOF:, FOR HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN HILLSIDE AND CARRARI IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRES APN: 201- 101 -25 A. Recitals. (i) Hillside Community Church has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -10 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 28th of September, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) Al, legal prerequfsitee to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolve; by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing can September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff repot-;s, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 5354 Haven Avenue with a street fronZz^e of 660 feet and lot depth of 675 feet and is presently improved with 3 temporary bu=ldings, a parking lot and Community and local equestrian trails; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of single family residential dwellings, the property to the east is Haven Avenue, and single family residential beyond, and the property to the west is vacant and designated for single family residential. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds acid concludes as follow: -/Z RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 88 -20 r ptember 28. 2988 Page 2 11 {a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or Welfare. or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use Complies with edch of the applicaVie provisions of the Development Code. 4. This COmmissici hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and consideretl in compliance with the California Environmental Puality Act of 2970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 2, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and 3`•:orporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 2. 'file roof material shalt be provided. Revised elevations of all buildings shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. 2, All walls within public viers shall be constructed of a decorative masonry material. 3. The three existing modulars shall be removed within two years or upon completion of Phase I, whichever occurs first. 4. The proposed modular shall be removed within two years or upon issuance of building permits for the Administration building, whichever occurs first. Engineering Division 2. The existing Community Trail on Haven Avenue shall be reconstructed to current standards. Revised parkway improvement plans shall be required for review and tpproval by the City Engineer. 2. Parkway improvements along Haven Avenue shall conform to the results of the Haven Beautification Study. 3. The southern most drivewaayy on Haven Avenue shall have a 50 foot stacking depth to the first parking salt. RESOLUTION Nn_• CONDITIONIk USE PERMIT :.88 -10 September 28, 1988 Page 3. . 4. The northo: °n either: m03C Oriveway on Haven Avenue shall be removed and a.) reconstructed to align with Ridge Canyon Road, or b.) replaced with curb, gutter and parkway improvements• 6. adoption of th The R ep Deputy to this Commission' shall certify to the APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAticNO CUCAMONGA BY: WY . e 7 a rman ATTEST: -W-aaTUT5-r, cre .fir ?, Erad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the r ' Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution City duly nand regularly introduced, passed, and ad City of Rancho Cucamonga, ax- a regular meeting ofe the aPlanningiC�m Commission on the 28th clay of September, 1983, by the following vote -to -wits AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES C(AirssIONERS: ABSENT: COK41SSIONERS: l\ w LLA Qe �aiiiy roi Y yf iwo. ieieY t+ W Gi CpL i �YG�00Y ^YC C 4 i1� Ahy�q Ya LOae Y NQ je Y•� n.�ON R�,G�u C 4q C v � � Y.� y.Y � `■ O=CY ppq L,C Nty�7'f ^.tl Y„sbAL r �Yw. ^V �YY 10gM ` T��v'i Y3!ivoj; pgjr� joI�U.� y Y C O Y 7 Gp y M Y 6 U; N, O � N W 0 Z W O i 1 V yt J briainal Poor MOW sop °peei �a �.g�.°.v N�t�i Ya.YY YwK� Of CYQ �awnp�YY ty,� LY.� +L 76 L■ Yom^ OL LOG GM3 y Y r Y C L O u ��ivyY� �o� gl"4�.� . ■q��� �aavDi Z` OYN V PONY Msyl upp p 3VN` Oesi yO «� C•�' CS9ei'°^ W+ yyyrY�S�a eNaa w� oS a ^yey ■p N L Lz�3. �y pGSq- g 6 V`wg uqs �a ee ��u. `�ol°►vv'r► wry ea+Y�E N�� aP�uoES �Y1y� as��c �. <.- V �C. N 4 Y^ Y OC r 6 N V V= p Y a N Y N p V €'eSy'aCCa=Oayw� Cgw.y FLO. a'c$.Lnu O i Y w� O LY A ~ O r x �v 12 y q N � O a Y = 4' p@ �9 t � C Op a Y ^{ pup O S� al M - $ its 7. 1 O Y .S O O O p L . q 6 N Y� v O i Y w� O LY A ~ O r x �v 12 v 7 d 0 «6g cD «�s Y U V s nU sY a W Y ° C ° c^ U pCw p � act:O 2 P \`V�W ✓a p fQ Lir A o�ttZ;.5 ✓<�M4.i OU2.211-9 Q aauc�« U sg'a e " o � Ywyr O ;sr 0 t CL. ry OY v y pp G -x N C� L^ N p � i w sT �Zoc A VP C M d -Sir- 0 V � V r L H � p C � M M ^� U $� � B`�p ° N M v a�v« N M 4 Q Aa _C «6'v° Nr 6p ^ 9 w y >YSY L n V O. r <q C C >LICC Yy Odigc V Y O 61 qNy w^ uC A L P y C C Prs��� ^rsy ^ VV�11 ^�s ~ Y �Q N G y p 0 w C4 O � Pyogy� I- ml i 'tii g:s u77> Py Aye �yj� 61h p ttY V r, N�N Mri�i�V� y C �I ^ EiIll OQY, °� aow p LO�+e i. O•L Qom. N �.��wRw Gw LO.NLn COL CY�N� yqw V &YM '�. qY °�`^ ray.Q icy y v Ln nyyn, NydYLY C�Nry. lO�1�V.'O V�p r {`. r N' 21, 5 n 1w OM GYMy N ,C aa,GC ' A 1> G L�O1 VGIC «C >Y O V.-... PH; .G.$Y g■ ^P4V19 fwlr NP 8L • Ay �VTCG�A .dyu0 VAS cc yy K40. N.�Y swU.� fc� yl�'P Y )� � r^ ^L.�pp_ya L Gt GGyp .r i N i G JP 8f_.1L �t� '^A ' 1iaNY CO ^Y •e� ® n� ry >COV Oyer' py u o q Y L. r'C yD 7 � pyyyMp o� .�6 U E rAr S� $iO ML ',O Cl L r ar M iv a^o YwSC° G• 7x � i� i! G f Y Y ty°t N L` Y a3M ''� yrw V y'IT „O y ZZ E� 4'� Mau Gay Wa ^.�T �i Of L� NyN Vim' rQ� vV Cq VLy La��'Q N a _V � x{v� 4 �,G� 9 ^� A �■ L 7 w N� q G U CP � 4c� ■yy�.iSC N%;, A8 �L 'V Q�is {NYcuC 42f.D INN �.`+~A V CV py yO.CYy����yl Cw^ LL�C� Apyy y4y�yyC Pw� 4L.L NO i ^Ma N7� QY y�V 1�n���^ TUCVN Y ~ g�o�= ^��ao yy1°riw« CQ H uo LAIR v c�od'N L)Pr1 v C V A tl.M� > tV CLV Y a V it Ngv Q -O! p V p ddiidd� C P f �Qe M p $vices VC fi C� p a C w Y +O� V:C�CN1j OeC sYYL.yy�9 xdd q O' U9 99`` C o V O4y�Cr �sV A M ��OFNO y Y O L ^VyV �grOOO ACC nyL V H TUCVN Y ~ g�o�= ^��ao yy1°riw« CQ H uo LAIR v c�od'N L)Pr1 v C V A tl.M� > tV CLV Y a V it Ngv Q -O! p V p ddiidd� C P f �Qe M p $vices VC fi C� p a C w Y +O� V:C�CN1j OeC sYYL.yy�9 xdd q O' U9 99`` C o V O4y�Cr �sV A M ��OFNO y Y O L ^VyV �grOOO ACC nyL V H a�w0 COOx C iOC O` OpO CO O��VC/W L'ws Pt ■!O LC wY O• W ti �C w4 ^ ^tl�r ppyy CUL C �dr L GYY� RI w.��Jrr v � °rte. � � I. C1 C NVm` Y•yy**� ty w�N yy ►'�O ��MwY.3 Ny p�.�sN ' �{41 .,^ '. d. �a�N �Q� ��. �a� "gyp^p �$i��r `.e pu�L �•�nNw eypL S4 °.� `TYbj� »4M �� pw. �L `M4Y•.:NLN LII M' ^�i•M- VN t .X. sS oIL ua�rr tV +_9 5Z IL: �}g wss`Y rr`C Y01^ p{II�COw 4V NCO+ +Y Qq ^,AyN04'pY gyVw� i.� V�N�, y' YNYYV D'C�i `C ty Nfat 63tr°s°�! oa ~ILI�ru:! .N.•'�''w° Cs eS�CY���'4'nq� 9— g~ �L`oy`j�� Y3 ��m� �NN,S ` NJ.NNN 93 4g e L lit �i01 O L NwY al u oY A:a CuiL c^ G 4 Y^ NOQ LL 4�0NaC� V%�` Nw N 1, N•w. <N iq0 M"Ni iN Vo•� >�wN yy CcpL.�C! aY aw� d sY 4.�wO.N � w• Ifl tj !� i f`' w�^ Lam•_ N Y G y� Nv.�6 « N� Y 'y 4. y'«4 G� 4qi rCpy�L,i gyp! C! ^ ■!p�O. {°l jpl�. USE wYy N ` 4:t t. at ma. wL zo 5' Y:40 Y■ L �w�Q 3.5 ii 4ew.a g^ NN v saY € vY p oo ��e1l 4i IO ?�s awe 'a o2__ �r4� i �ss� �� grew g..�Clwyxa ' N.N 4�MYYY :T N^ wO v Yvl4 +Ys Q1 >. ` w bb� C N ""a C N$ w Y Sl $ $ = w N.. � 4 ®C f gwC& 1;U ew . +°.$ s$NUw r��C•a7: «o N�� C +w,�4 QCQ ^by�Y -y1 YGG abt V�JywCC } Lv_N 4N CAS lL OC LD OI m ^ i <n'O iws ,C4'qi�yl.. F�O,a• SV <VL �pwM.� iC C <N0. WeYo �s�a a W -"Y H L+.I 93s Yy= G� Y 0 o ^�y Yww0. �3« .i Y W N app d n� u�o C V v G v0 ^ C 6 !� Y r- wY■ °. dL 6 w' c ^ L A w +tea uNakki � �y 2 u + t a�� 6 M Y w N c ■�a, rte= Y� A 6C C > a N ca nttwp �,,GG oo J tT CP'rYV'f Y C N N Yv cY � w a vri N NA Y O rw• Cub C L G O a� Y u.�.. tl y K Y HW ;mO V �^ oGa C t�S : � O t� tY s ~ Y ^ay� W M L GLN G CCoin LXigina9 Paor Quality EtE Ac 1;R -:-;- w 1L�4 >U u2 wt7^ CL1A Y Y VIA.- o °g O LGIVN L�N Y V tl L V��q� ��Lt �W'. =MIAgue .sue N �.S 88 A. G Y >S o � NY Q ; IVES ? Sartle� Nob A2=01€ ;. N .p Hi c +e ^Yp ti 2.5 miu V.1L�1 0 e C� ppp�itip � p L Y � ^ Y?+r Y O N �� yCy qq ai jj,, +o r ��d� Gstl 2Vs'ri,'M �wV «Y° C p �a�allff N. N ° 4 S o °uu �y i O $V iu�Y dO«CI cca� wN.w+w Y� L.Y -•.N V+ �Y Y � �s�ya C Y{ -h z Y w P i C p M•Y � � .5ML �I 4 W n m Y a a a w u Yu w`I d et T d Qa L 6N L �G d °oN V +� C1 L C r � C q i 'G w d Y Y a c Y Y r C Z9wP y �y fll yG C m ",Z LN gCYN J. Y� S .0 ■ w � L V. 4 TL v=z a! +� ii +p�aN( `V� � Yg�g Jr■y+ � w. C. ,$ vw 6I� TL ki- C CC + N V � L N ��f {' w L �• Y��� � + ^ L� a � � +� Y NC` ,,,pii2 wM i�Y�• pa + 04 So. i�0 aY-Q V� a IO r L O C y 1 G Y + LL��b � �C]�w+ LM•N jMC�� VE CLY NII6 � CjAC yyY �q (c���Y ((,�} "Yw Oi Nbty C � u4� .53E rte CO LLLUUU ,psi rw� + 0140 wr- O . J 'y ip U�� +��C i Npyw^ �C� {Y�aqLq M+-2 ^ Y`L[► ON 5i� LCfiN w L.p L C Y N O Q O y h c. =�..L. �i. ■� .0 Fc w.c. �� t��. ouYN.N. Y t�tr r-5 c Y Q ZL u a1 Cr V V O w Y ^ a�wa µkw a T N■ WLLW N M YY y C �y yy6p L ~ $ Y V r L 6 �� p4 O� w p'� .HL wN gC1 e.Y A 6 x o - U ,4 4"� jr, b `7 QY�MQMQCp fuaa40 0 YnY.�lfO L.4L W VN�Yj YgNw t. i iaysf Qr t` >� Yam. � NV x NOM+;. Ly�tpO�t O �� �Ra AG >w LyyY..0 LMT GN ` G1� t. L V C 4,Oa C6 fi vn Ww� w '°a« at yta `LwT atK yCJ■ CS~ �G tew �x •� r$ �l N OV �'4 f` 1GI'V` qyw• �N9 {{S11 w v � N�(�}},+/f, lOC4C}wA�.v '■C! u C+�.Y y tty wV 4y q6 0 ob b A 2 �M y L' wr aV Ay«y Y u uL OOFNTSUw6 ;tw ii aet ;, ..COL V ^L Y N ur' 4. ads ftpuo } Pas ��,a g u 4 Fr ar„ N p e _b L� Y 3 AO m�8 aq w� N� � N C Y a �c � L N �Nq N b d oaf d .. of Y4 r 4 0 a V b O L L� xY t N AO v r � sCu L 'b u4 O q M' s� r a� w� 5,Q ILI L W Y M �A n N 6 N L � D .4 . V Cr yyV �v � a vv Y« M o � S y � N T d N N L w C R� qq CYi� 01 ja4� 5 V C3} SEAR R CLYrJ to LO c a d r yL C O V d 4 i O r. 4 L a.a ow q 4 a` U 0 n; w T N M K'S s T L a N w v L a a� T8 s M L a.r li c ag 'v c C hb. 4 O x V r 1 '4 'eq UP Lv €e gM ppN b�� 1r tw� V VAx Ll K y Y i tl LL�W �j Tom' M x V 1 T rur�o.S. rN N�4 C Y _� A V I G z V C � • VE51 L R F k A � La VQ m � T p�a ww �% 6 4 q00 �F fyY �u T N �N G w OIw O N < Of� s R[. A 4 C T 0 8 Y A i N C T 4� y �3 OI O Y �w g a -(:. w�. V _ye Y� b w M His � MM V 4�sY J! ¢gN N 2,51 .wrsU .r ..:: «ti's N sa v U Yp �Y i T 5 -If. N V M atft v� o +f w Y C d L t ■cso Y 4 Y Y C c� b„ s� 1° 4 Ao1 >t 1 . bat.= T� o6 IT Q A M�` � alQ�{.LYQpp p4 O,C `y • � 6Y p ~ tF.�T pObs {l�YUO G u ~ Ali •I JuNt QCA PL . C �.r`. i0 YV.a.t 13 Y `O�C �6w lr Y 11 10 •I x w iJ L Y O Y V A r,� s p iw O Lti' W ` Gg i8 3a Aye T V RM �c 4L NN b!o tF ab ca 87 E �i ��ff i C W W 6� f iy`�1+ Y V L M y � y} Y O a aw/Y nti r � � A I—to �� C F's 6 M L Y O Y b 4Y a a z °_ «p 19 w .,y K els L w ♦IYQ V fALt � 0490bal poor � w y 0 0 L L p°r,'r°� 6 u 2 2L q Ay s L A N�.s p. dU 94C tl b CCU^.+ N T' U SJ 54L +EA N ;;3 'a� AyT �b _ ■pi L L C L w��, � GG 4 N)+ N V a a s 0 Y C a, G i b.CJ v+ y „$OV VUD' araN yY NfiY U � CL z9 -+Cu C N ^ Oo a 4 S.w YLL fia NLqSq •nU V1 o.W A^ t4W fi 's"a '�L�aV A `u ".° ya•i+e L'e � a. � Ka• Y5 yrs!ga d 7A SA fyy�pQA �'Yqi Y M1` w � ccG �p b¢�4 rya CC�CC�C CLp`r9�. bra fitLs dA t��®��. �. VqN C� G. ON gatA 4w Vq M O �` L1 ZZ Qlt "Pi f CN V Gm Q raC0C1 '.�W oVpN LEI Ljwm L.�� .may Wti A� q�*".''".r53 QE -0CC +yV�// AL ip� E 6■Y1LV � � y al WO.N Cif A VitliV L .2's $ ,i 1T �..CyC y C VW N H aLy. x1 01 VV GN~ Ll Si"A y����y}11 ppp Ri E Y�,V LW Kw Ael Ay cw IJ Ot C q" O '1► b "tl' µ f A 1^VlSi tTr1V. yy ,,cc lAda+w��,. M/V OV r•Y d`.s wt7 4�1 R 4y Y w. *Y ��C11a�11 O~..t. tea'! V C y 6^ eQ+ i4 `l.` G ��" CYYC Lt App SNY ,`�5+ gi� K.�Oy� C! a1 a r'�.•a 44i .�. v L Y O Y V A r,� s p iw O Lti' W ` Gg i8 3a Aye T V RM �c 4L NN b!o tF ab ca 87 E �i ��ff i C W W 6� f iy`�1+ Y V L M y � y} Y O a aw/Y nti r � � A I—to �� C F's 6 M L Y O Y b 4Y a a z °_ «p 19 w .,y K els L w ♦IYQ V fALt � wzf 4U � w r>��s at p°r,'r°� 6 u 2 2L q Ay s L A ,p i V i. Y 'w 6.3+••' u 54L +EA -0-4! ktJ.p=u.Y. ;;3 'a� 5Ra A`li y� -V. T="4% w a, G i V~ yuois ."'v Al O _C N 4 S.w YLL fia NLqSq •nU V1 o.W A^ t4W AML lip fw 1 Ah u U V O O Vii' ng c7w �yJtl Ul a�u� ""..� gnu OC OL L' ° a C T 1ttJ cc sn W E� ± V^ ° d Y O � n LYH YOY CC A� L LL L w u Y Y ca Y�v Iv Oy0 iYa' E� q �'. H. O Y w O• - `' C +y O ;gas i0� b I AML lip fw 1 Ah gnu a (gut 25 cc sn ± QH y.Vbpp� ��QV Y W. � n LYH YOY CC iYa' E� �a `' 1 �° � Y qqY ogqvL o.N. .N.rn y u v.Y. M c a•U C� O d 1 L^� � � A ��C J O f L 6Y y O L L� 4 ytL.�CCBI = G °dn �y['�f L YL� ` pY i.Y i�9 �•OV i {v1OL1 VV{Y�u� N �� U�. erT °0• yY tpFO a �O�Y .yf O LpC H 6 CCz YY wa .LH ,CYG e� A C ^ 0 �^ wu N D L UZ T��yy M L w ,o }i y r s�'t NNu ; &gm � s � L: Y OV �C�D N4.V' VG 7.� ►7 ^y Q> C { ■pY��.. CT yYJ�.O M�j O. �oCn `T CY 'FIR L� a MCd y CY dVFi Y ^eY� YN i° ^UC ■C GG'�'.rT L9C11.A{d 1f 6 tl <n Fyw iW O` 6T <71 Y.�N YT eCQ YY �Tir V�L' Nom° AML lip fw 1 Ah �o CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMOI�Tr:A. STAFF REPORT DATE: Septembr -r 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROW4ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-38 - N T7-CR9Rr.Fr- We requesl7o install a mo u ar u6 i"TaTn -g (Silr x - <.4 or a church classroom (Sunday school) facility on 8.6 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District located on the west side of Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Road APN-. 201 - 101 -25. Related File: CUP 88 -10 Y. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested- Approval of the addition of one 8,640 square Too emporary modular building and issuaace of a Negative Declaration. S. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). South - Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East Single Family Residential; Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units oa;, acre). West - Vacant; Very Low Residential District ziess than 2 dwelling units per acre). C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). North - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). South Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). East - Very Low Resident..1 (less than 2 dwelling t;nIts per e acre). West - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units pe) acre). - - -- - ITEM T PLANNING CQWIXSSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 88 -38 ;,HILLSIDE CoM mUNITY CHURCH September 28, ig$8 Piige 2 0. Site Characteristics; Currently existing on the site are three emporary mo u ar ra ldings which ac-upy approximately 11,52A square feet and Parking Lot A, consisting of 100 spaces. The remaining portion of the site slopes at approximately 8% from north to south. i E. Parkinci Calculations: The site as currently developed with I i_"_ i`ree mo u ilc`lings and 3660 fixed seats f r worship services is required to be parked st 1 stall every 4 per seats (88 re-, %ed). However, 100 parking spaces have actually been Prowl I The addition of a 8,640 squar foot building for Surrct� School purposes does not require additional parking. II. ANAV SIS. A. General- The addition of an extra modulo building is to be Part-BT-Phase I construction. Three modular buildings totaling approximately 11,540 square feet currently exist on the site along with a parking lot consisting of 100 parking stalls. The existing .nodular structures are to be removed upon the completion of the family center building tend of Phase I). B. jDf8Si a Review Committee: the Design Review Committee (Chitiea, ���Ke$ eYzr rev ewed the project on September 8, 198$ and approved it with the following conditions: 1. Entry stairs facing Haven Avenue should be combined and a deck provided along the southern elevation in order to tie in with existing te. ;.Orary structures, 2. A trellis element, 11ith the 4vpp4rt1n9 posts extending above the roof 'tine, should be provided in order to tie -in to the existing mod0 ar units, F It was noted at the Committee meeting that landscaping was being provided and that the proposed modular would be ' painted to match the existing temporary buildings, C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been COMPTefed 5 y e app cant. Staff has completed Part 11 of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts the on environment as a result of this project. PLANNItHG COMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 88 -38 - HILLSIDE Cow"UNITY CHURCH September 28, 1988 Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This praaect is consistent with the eve oilmen c e an he General Plan, and will not be dFtrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, building design, together with recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Devel opg!ent Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing ink ga y -Re ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices senfTO a grope - owners within 300 feet of the project site. "J. RECOi�!ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approV—e—Co—n-d-fffonal Use Permit 88 -38 subject to all conditions or approval through the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Res p UllY s 'tted= Bra �1 er City P nnet BB :BN:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Building Elevations Exhibit "C" - Grading Elevations Exhibit "D Landscape Plan Resolution of Apr,.^oval with Conditions ti i. vi,51% vs 5f MODMAR5 -1 PA OF056D MOPOI-AF, 0'111, 1 rmml P TrrLE. EX.HiBrr. SCALE- L-Al E .lMON . yW r,5 art, Oft vll'uk Cam- a d,* provi &A 4di!j CITY Off' '"l ���... 4RAINCM CLTCA rrAi:�P, -3s TITLB:..t s! EXHIB[p A SCALE---. r� 1 I i j .lMON . yW r,5 art, Oft vll'uk Cam- a d,* provi &A 4di!j CITY Off' '"l ���... 4RAINCM CLTCA rrAi:�P, -3s TITLB:..t s! EXHIB[p A SCALE---. r� V V5 OV CLICI�l A Cl so - n... emirs .. halt 6eetr t+tFaisaa , ' 5+♦�W axe ��. Fc.�c , gat e�.wa � �rc a.• lia s.yr� ••+ r♦. ? • �y aa9SW. w •74r TN✓••�No�C7Wi. f�•�7(.nCR.. � �^m...I �"_'�:wtr��•!' • '' �i.� I I M I •c+�awL 1_ l *rot* COMA 64a rwlti5lflte tm�y, r_� NOM CITY OF ' g fi PLANNING 1 (VIS) EXHIBIT: RESOLUTION NO. Ask A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONi,�A PLANNING COMMISSION. APPROKNG CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -38, AND DE....GN REVIEW THEREOF, FOR HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH LOCATEL ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN HILLSIDE AND CARRARI IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DUELLING UNiTS PER ACRE) - APN: 201- 101 -25 A. Recitals. (il Hillside Community Church has filed an application for the issuance f the Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -38 as described in the title of this Reso.ution. Hefnlriafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as 'the application ". (ii) On the 28th of September, .888, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. Ask IV NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determir'I" and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as Tollows: i. - This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and cor'roct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September, 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: Avenue with a(street hfrontageaof 66 applies et ndplotedepth of 675 feet and is presently improved with 3 temporary buildings, a parking lot, and Community and Local equestr'an trails; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of Single Family Residential dwellings, the property to the east is H&ven Avenue and Single Family Residential beyond, and the property to the west is vacant and designated for Single Family Residential. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced pubic hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: r PLANNING MISSION RESO �TIOW No. RE: CUR 88 -38 HILLSIDE CMNITY CHURCH September 2$, 1983 Page 2 0 (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Ccde, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions aPDlic,ble thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvemer+ts in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use Complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the finding;, and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby 4pproves the application subject to each and every condition set forth helow and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporcited herein by this reference. Planning Divisior (1) Entry stairs facing Haven Avenue shall be combined and a deck provided along the scuthern elevation in order to tie in with the existing modular structures. {2} A trellis element, with ",e supporting posts extending above the roof lintr shall be provided in order to tie in with thr'; existing modular structures. (3) The area surrounding the modular unit shall be 18, ' ^cr :ped. (4) tructure. structure shall be painted to match the existing structure. (5) The proposed 60' x 1$4' modular building shall be removed upon the completion of the family center building or two years from the date of approval, whichever comes first. 1 E. PNINE COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. CUP 88-38 - HILLSIDE COMM. UNITf CHURCH September 28, 1988 Pace 3 Engineerinc Division (1) The existing Community Trail on Haven Avenue shall be reconstructed to current standards. Revised ! Parkway improvement plans shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer, (2) Parkway improvements along Haven Avenue shall conform to the results of the Haven BW'tification Study. (1) The southernmost driveway on Haven Avenue shall have a 50 -foot stacking depth to the first parking stall.. (4) The northernmost driveway oh Haven Avenge shall be removed and -either: a) reconstructed to align wit Ridge Ca or nyon Road, b) replaced with curb, gutter and parkway improvements. (5) Surety shall be posted and an agreement eXecttted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public street improvements, including removal or reconstruction of the northerly Haven drive approach and reconstruction of the Community Trail, within 18 months of approval of the Conditional Use Permit. do n. Secretary to to s Cor of this Reses olutiomission shall certify to the adoption APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4! "'A BY: a e , a rman ATTEST: —Pa —u er, ecre ary t 7i —z �M!ldIN6 C"ISSg4N R O September 28, 1 988 I LUTION No, RE: CUP' 88-$8 - hLLaIDB COMMUNITY CNURCN Page 4 Is Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission Gucamonga, do hereby certify that the fore mi ion of the City of Rancho regularly introduced, passed, and ar!opted by the PlanningtCoommwssioaulf the and City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission herd on the 28th day of September, 1988, by the fallowing vote -to -wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES:. COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONEP.S:` 12 3 ylginw. Poor Quality RI OI i W N r �1n �Nr N • .`i. �� i aNs_� ~3 ! N mom ~�3� �o yynr� � A NN rp 4 N r 9 C. MS A Y �.. OU,er OS O C rCr : ark €tea .; �-� 3 a= ~I � ��ce QQQ .NiN N$ ^ rp n"04 q NAa y x g qqi i gg� G r ro S ^r�1Oa m�Ap� 4a �� r +n pi'S one a � e n_t r 4 e �y w,�>e• ~may �MNyw SQL c-�: •N N_r rO r A o•=r�� wAro• ! N 4 0 $on L A v oa; n .e.. �S�ryE Nng^g r0 Ori ^t9 ON��� Nei 0 G�.A�m A �9 ?syroj.» �40 Ar��d. �� a9• r O.A�GiO A6w .��• �O. tP .. r0 r �s aN 1Z, pa r M z 0 I a <� RO nf10 N m. N1rM\S CITaU'' x c 1 1� 1 N I �v Yrr m d wo n q aaaaa b = V N ^r= g^�aAw _ 3$jj. m w nNp��Q� r� G ; • • r Sm^o$p� R R��Nr G m C = N yry4 o� 'v» M 3 1 jMwl ��f) t � r Q ua111 I I I I Ix ,I ' i .- I M%�C A Jar rm r' AS 99R i$o �y nr. YN. �ni b•Nr ''�i�eibM iy" =ilr +v o % °N in.'.m no °e w' � $p'�t�� r= ^p ° IZi�S J'w�^%`� $'!9 A �1 yNy�4 Y m :� arO"�f'f,p� '� � �.1 w ; � C � � 0+ Pj m w E N. a � � � ■ �G A � p Y it � p � p 7 i y 0.1 n tavrilG$ IIr �+ 1=O nova t•�1 'sa r rm nN apri.r.'°�ps, °r� 11 �n1 t%r� ^Mg S. prr ��Nn Erg.- Erg.- 'a =� one "Qp N o(pr1�� firfra -2 o EE ��R. Nti 9 =n wwN ON r _�4 FS �i 6 'err terra' ti4. �g Oa M' N�� b�_ �sM FG. nS ri m�ae� emi`N '�dt iu r do �{�r. emr �ft.. ' v a �A 4 �I �n Ems inoi'mg O_ ■. b� r � M1 r �j g A N�� 4 rrf C ' C t f M m. r r :+'ati m < °no a mood �g� arewt n� 4 m�$' �E••m��iv ' �n brm �? � %$ °��•N ?v im -;�� Q ��,ji sE o n i s No Mai Nph ax.. ° 4�". n po.g. a mm &= m�':Ps o r��s DRY `°` A O G 1G p r C .q m O p~ �O =� �✓ � Cw, 11.Gi�N.b 6.0.., ��Mrwls. lei• a�PSO a/OV;?rn=iw ;ern oc .'+V-1 :- +wa "ong 9m_r »»ri.wQ o,wTo� vk r4�woa apN CY �; �� • OAN ��4C PS S'FN Nm9M .N "'"J �iN `14 eaaaaQ�. omw` �;b"6 QZ.'.'mSs,� 9129�8{zcw .N.tRe �c �G�p�Taa� 'a r nir�u r. p''� IE- P-i,m1v n` a� ;, !, - `.ri 4iw r �^.. �Npo. � rc'�c-f rm�m� o q. 3'cR MNq v^�`wSV A� 'mono p•�SANS ��0� ~� NQ Oro 6r Y �.�� t0 L. R�� C7�M p1�pm 6MtG6 nm'�� n0 �r DO � w. N'� �YRy N�. w�+w_� (�r� mryOjr R�O• 72. rw a ?003'uR r w 7 wo% 0�+{m'Jry ■ On3a 7 MC3 p ^� Yw �.fmlm wrw m-m. ur r�. a b� mpg IOO tiNt7 p . wm �fJ fmJ.iD r; n�.O11 Mkt `10�C 1440 ��56� pt�D Oft J M CD Ll -1A a E N h ty 9 i 1 Y ^ r a t, IM n � N p nyjMn6 on O a pV Ono O _9, Y r pan 6a» sR rl° j 0�? ,r C n 3 � Dm R �sd G J Na Qaa Po �aN nY O +» ��z�dna Jnr �Cn 117 b, 10 T R b »9 Y�Id6 c�aoa�� N N.g p a Z � G a T nn O R � as pN° �t aNi• ? S _.wrY Oi 1@Y w^g0y° °c' m �T6a gbyp yY v 6: N'• N M �^ s r 6 N -• s rr a' T D L N n �» �O O Y Y a p sv D 1 d 'K Y n Y a� 2X uric �'n t n ffpY '•ontf 6 pa 6~'1 »aa ybY• t NON JN N 'a r fR o v n roN� t0 C1•�s O s Y N e�a3 N »I•� w rQ R er � 7 rrN a d b A boa f _ r » a N N r N .+ 6: r0 aQ ®a 6�� p m s n 6 i s a^ Rr N •• �rypO S >rP a .n..�'.. N r „O • r 9 N N n a n N b e N A 6 n �» N (i r pM 6� p i S r»x'° Cn� n O a 'a » eO N y r � w �r a �n H 7 � a .rs ��'1111111 �0° 6p p0 w 2. V dr.' y Y �n np im D r N a � N� R an 6 w. r 9 � o ■ ■R dC >� w At T Q9 n r ■■ e r », u @oo YC :� Nr.I °Y U2 •n rn d unjr0 � A N ..r p• N a. aM a'a W N6�a 6ai 1"�r , oar rn p �O'GA O �!s•R q e'rt',Naa era p as O'd T nam° C. piC.�..� A + R »�a pNb O r G r o� e IcZ,r.,'n6. .q M;r N rRS m ?y ri N N n 7 »p q� OY Y. » O� C s s' J N u n m: o � V N9 YO+. p�Y M4 la• .piV �p r� gyfpq Egg.r p.p . ypR �. Wpb YON lu-10p p= l9 �l..r •.N�.+,�rIC m �. ��1 NL�. O N p C N N_ iY W Y N r y t-" rw s- as fnY »OS i e , „.■ li!7 o. "C9 : n IN a`o<..„�Y,1�� °v IC �R O��.O d +; Oi ra? a6 N� N�T p7 �faf�G 'C +�N Rp arm oN »d�6O .lr a YRC 1 by a'• ? »NIOJ a.O rS.63A »�N Ra+ �pk »O' 06.yn YR 9," �R� 9� b �r�l 1 RRN �0 ,• g.6� w.s O .1-9 -1 ry0.In,pig j • �:1 R A��Y (. �• +. Gs ar �n~'{rS »� Y» Tani R�. i�WM ` !Y O j�» t Na naA1 r a� "ta1�7y Rtn^ �.(p A ✓g 7,�N ,Oe9 Off' mod. aye 7 t(pa�� L N W +Yr O N a �E. =b C6.»" Oya��•� CCt00 CTT »�. a10. Obi •l» °ro � +; w'�� O�1 C.O +d • MNR'�_ �c.Ne an.n �,p a�a A.'" '4 N-. o ���y »Na= s p GY» »6Ri tT J.� •c N6to ? ^Y•6.T 'p... » NNa''N'_ »»Rwy Rr 's o Q�.�R v �? RYl I o Y'1 + _ ne a� »�. 269." �.,, • , aN �n Tj a�,nr °r°urinN plan -'^ '"�+o mG '+ y�m ■ ■a •O �•C IwC mNN O� AVO ugr D� 6A N.^.A .o'..^'n »yQ� q 16.+ �. P » G r nR.�yY�O r peNMY TYa••�N R J O A4 »a N Y6�0 ' G rn C'J .� p z•, i O6 .iV n 0 +• �. K Y nRr �' N S.OjI n ry` G �• NCR Y ORC6 as 6 A^]nMCY O Om.OpRJJ b. rn »pR�p� C» �O a N. pr T �t G J t • w J' » +TG rr»i. a d G nni� pl. . J§ssrp �6}vIm °Yen »rte -gyp '§.." nM. M T Vi R6aS3 OYN ��qi i. �'OA �b Mj 4a 9 Y O D` R 2 `S »tit0 1 n ,U ti f r" P N i y N p ■A A<� : a tpl � ■t A N A B ®� i p r r �1 � ■ •y P � n a N_ • y 9•tl r r O � Ap A N ti P. Y L N C O 1!9 � ii {p O Tar r r = Y A A tP G A A 1. a,�! Q11 n _ fA N a- M s a r. r n 1p O L S G A A t! + rIK R O "� 'nom hC� myVi Y vwO Nes r�r '.,. �■ 6.�iW �.a �i r6Y� � �. n A r An^N r. �nQsg : �•,,$ s�. ���� �N� Ord ;n a �4 ?;� d ^R d � n ars'r�. r �pwr yN. Rapsr T+:i ' Ap�A r ^'ItlAF 1is r Aa�'aLA ivy N N i*O p .N.. r r 'QN 1Np� N L nOn + y C. i eA� P:. � [1 f`� VpjS � � 0. 'pO, !Y; O ar ■C M •.• C tC L 'rF fl'n � hb�^ Atp »•"• a,r. C� >T��A N 'rf �, P ai— 1 � p• ��.TR S 9 Yt 6A a vC r r. Y. O A` S O. Y A 2 SAN n� ryR pia s'$ r� 5. ^ns^ 5. N� •'JAY • Q�Ca,r ��_•y ` 'z`� C -s 4r 'y1�N O•Ci 1p Q �9 ' °Y.y 11p t_�1�11!0 G`il, p�INC irpa Gtr� J !'� pR Np ,ppCippf� F 6 Sri r�6 �F2 NbC OW A $�� F� Q�b1� � �fp+�p��F • O A �•A�� ~slP�. Aso 9 �y Arr ^ ^fl• • .w r tO R• Ar S fa ~ `RO OO mN O-cn -a Ib ap tC7�•G a I:• . O :V � to a �'O �.ff +@ C � D •M Y ..� SAO eennnn'ti �p.��y +N� � q S.IAC oal r r '1 Pl l'f A rp � O pA O r r N Y r y � 9 r r y� "t1 t'� 9C Y w A Y � C ♦ sr a� _ 6 6 6 @ O N A,CyA • V W j ! � �.•ir A 9 ACr N� Z fl� ryryj � R �'r� ��'yN�EN �N�r'M 0p 34A M n =i�R O.PflN. N= A A H !� Cpy�..,C i n r 0 Qr�Yw t i N r JOiTM Try >• 1On� �' ?dip S_. +3 � O a c A_ O G �o re.r 2.v KS�� B :. . ~R��O aY ���r H NrA $yA �r • �r r »O naN A Odr IDS @ 9 a r w r 'a i'g r n�i9 °n 9-r s1rA� �� Nm i• na�� �■+�i ap n ra ti� t s-s s C FEZ fs+ A r m ,*„'n ,.,a Y gg G .R. @@ {^, R� eWi PA� »a X97 DS t� -si p�m'yYr tL A�pAp 9i7a 6d@ e..e p ■�N 99 n` i >er a•o 9 @r M too now c9 am rn. 6R „omAa r� °�nr. a' .�9 WE rm M •� QQwo'+° `6M3 Ar1O C7. +9 AO D ��nL•�'1 e9q nA ?r�.N Y.1, f)r Rap b4 pr iC >y >yA n@r [Y9A �Ar� ��G � NA •w A CaFY� C @,ane`�meB• f29 �� sang +$r 5,:, o,°+.i s�..oOqA . J .2 � C . A 7 d� I ?N��. ,p S A D 6p �= p C �Pa n n @^ 9 n<� r.» � •'� R� 77� a5�� � j� A AIM y.•c N R• �p�'.ry. igi C_ oo� r +rlr •NNyrr Y r ;. y LRa�d�~ N @9 6 Original PGCW Qty &Ilify ( t 1� pp O •A iJ � N ■ ^ C r � N° �prjO' +M �G nhT NP.\ & 9_O Ob rby y� A{� r # N {sS� Y rp. �p•p .�..Jw M 00 G1YlO �cN1 if 'I��j�` C Ate. • 10� A7 Y 1A M{ saO M �{ ID n.N .JOi r06Aa N_ 11� n N !!ll�lilYY N° 9 A M fit ^ ^� b" n °.N O e•IC >' ooN sn 'og'� •�'a °eNg. re RR..O G o`•yE.°�.R o basic �• b� D. �'Na 2ism"° ffiffi p -•O 11�� 3 -• —IM YCr,°g t2l W ^~N YD` M .OU ^• O ON �Qf- 1 aT :pd R s- €ate �-11 ;o'N so- EEO HL a X�.ro T c YY nn nom f[a. bi Fia -°�{o •� �•°f SA103 g iggo gi. .e,o .rgn...ee IR w° an U, 43, N3 {'off R gp. ^ .ci �.ya 1,.1, b`R•cw"o'S -•°w�. Gmni�c.Y. Cb. .09i� JJJ •'� y �� 9r �. S^J r.^.. S.3 9pp- ®�®�w 7r b'mON A Sl 6 r N� f Yb V^... �'tsy �� t►^�J M �.If T°R' rtO flffO tiv19 FER °e °�. G,ng \ O i�f°• a �fD 'j Tr %u �e p■ 2'� {e i N O vo' feDD oy�O. K R T �ll 9 09 t O O' K �ia gw.� -v A C Y.S.w1=O s A b.y^i.A Ta� °p9 }ECG its c u°YN /•S {•moo oOra O m Ci 1 f � N r� f _> ��`�5 l�`�.=i \.➢Y� C�arel'a'fiy� �VI ��la �j'�. � ^ 1/T! ^r 1♦Ib 7` Rlb N " 9 A y � 1 to ne'a" r sso a s: q€ 7 9Cfo wA 'rR A.r.r d S N� 49 AaN 5' w si o" N c 2i vt! yy ^'n w O s�aq '0A.nS�•� �.�p � r M�k _rr @P �4.� •� �W -` °♦ � 1♦GIr 4 .rp= N � � �+ p� Nr M�h +T �.41¢��. �i� '4f Q� w4•N�w �n"w�a �Cry �N r H. N 'ter r O if�v��?g��nm �� LS.9e .. o a N In _ 1 91 an �a'A" � �•".. �. ~e°i a :° �♦r '�r' ,� �u I Vin. ���aa �op, $(iQay ��w•� �'�+o 9 ° �o �� T A p 6• 1" ti a. Y �Y t cNM m 'Lni n at IR to a K w� eL Q >,1K h A h t A 1 . Z f" �b Y FI n ♦y � r w q ��y. �ty0 'l. bf�► � .p6_r, ►$ 0pp0 .�+. ^nw''»tx ap�pl �. �`�i SA� 9n� .�i ?ri `4�1� I 6A5 AA`t•ro h 'r � +`� N� N� �'�A'� y� �r MN9 AA NmA S ±� � n:N nn ER n9 ♦►H. p�i.9 � Y'� NA b z.. y �A b • .� q�l 4 �. �. cv pR b�� tO r p � Sr mri GWo- t°O NO» F.S11 m� yn io �a� a � eaa S� � s^lf�e•. =m � n°'pp os �p�n � as 10 � � ,..Tr M1 � + �^C. .�.• D VAR NO .Ay C11i`1 r 2Z rK : G% gaY» b -T+♦�' o. !L n " � °ENO •�, ii E'es,r,..ep e�. " o� rn G �R �Ar � �' � N N N•aST'jhQMn ■�n■ fir, � �y1 �� w =RO '�' -MO • 10 Q Z4 f�•IN RO,F r 4 ♦C h o. A ♦ A R riC Q p O~ q N C �� w_ l I �o s O'Ny �rA �O= r vcpp7 f�qp O� yy A � Mro10D� O+ N ^h IG ryY +O �N.pN n~ y�O' »`•� ati A R��� CM.r lag N� rr �jyr� N. mri9 7� a y`. �roro'9. t1 •°I! 7�O � r7 Ar 6� � �i i AK p ��� N �pp�Oyn NA y^r�µ Nt�..s �•�[9� O..^..� Itr �taN.� p �. �y� M �M prp'pG a N1A O NE �pr� M ?yN —I �a progR G..n If •� QAQ r � � i A Mtp � 29 ate. ,�i�'i t +�rg_• 'fig °R °a nnvR m �.� RN ��.' UNp AN '�NO �'1"i�' y.. ��•ri.•.� �c1f7 =r Fok F, j� •• 9 'S ro t O f n�a � � S A ^ � A A A A! .. 4?� 6 a C 4' p. $ r w... A.rr pp EIS.' A.7 ReO�.fs^ �Oi r N + N �`r ~.. NQ 4•� »»■■QQ. f! a , Oro A N Sn n r Nr.- w' n w ff .' rGn ''V� eeeeettttt�� << n rot 0 i b N 6 !�' 1►10 • t � Rr anro a<r ( My3 R I of •OwrC G �r a R o� •YY C? OAS Syir rS rn le ze Ar o r p R ' ov mfr ji ' —"-- CITY OF RAxCHO CUC STAFF RL'P, �T cA DATE: T0: September 28, I98$ Chairman and FROM; Members Brad Buller, the Planning BY: City Co er, Planner omission Scott Murphy' phy' Associate Planner fanner _ ASSESSMENT o� on 88 rest en la AND TENTATIVE Designation acres of su v s70R ° TRACT 13527 _ northwest i2 "4 dwellin land in s n9 e ApN� 225_ corner of 9 units per the Low Residential 071 -55• Etiwanda Avenuea and at Street 1' PROJECT AND �_ SITE DESCRIPTION: A• Action Re ° nested: e9a ve Approval o B' ec aration• o: the subdivision ma proJ�ect Density: P and issuance C. Surroundin Z -86 dwells Land ng units per acre or Use and Ionin South scan ; oun - Vacant; en sal 3 East acre) Very LOW Residential - Cucamonga Count X1'2 dwelling facility; y Water District units per West Per acre) Very LOW Residential Water trea - Vacant; Utility (1-2 dwellitment D. General Plan y corridor 9 units ro ec Desi nations: North e - ow esi ential South Low Residential (2_ (2-4 dwell, Very Low Residential dWej]1 9 units Per Per East acre) (less acre.) Very Low Residential than 2 dwelling units per West acre) (Less Opel SPace than 2 dwellin E. Site Characteristics: 9 units per average southeast. ° aPP o imatelyis 6• ant Ca 1 i fornias olhe tract is currerfMly vac property, Edi'o Corridor ordered 7$ om with an Street Etiwanda As °n the west b northwest to will be ►•elo a ed apProximatelyntersect3 npm with nt of tithe 650 feet to he west ITEH u PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13527 Meicher September 28, 1988 Page 2 The purpose of this relocation is to deter traffic from usir►g Etiwanda Avenue, south of 24th Street, and retain the rural character of Etiwanda Avenue. It is anticipated that residents north of 24th Street will use tray Creek Boulevard (when constructed) and East Avenue to access the freeway and point's south. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The property is currently within the City's Sphere of- Influence under the jurisdiction of the County. On June 22, 1988, the Planning- Commission recommended approval of a Development District Amendment (pre -zone) to designate the site as Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acrd% On July 20, 1983, the City; Council approved the Low Residential Designation. The annexation of the property is tentatively scheduled for the September 21, 1988 LAFCO (Local Agency. Formation Corwiissioit) meeting. B. General: The applicant is proposing to create 252 single amp y ots ranging in size from 9,000 to 27,000 square feet in area. The average lot size within the subdivision is 11,7,82 square fc':t in area. At this time, the applicant is p►oposing to grade -'Nn1y those areas necessary for street and trail Improvement;. the plotting and grading for individual units will be reviewed upon submittal of a complete Design Review package. C. Design Review Committee: On September 8 1988, the Committee a es ey. —Cfil •ea, uller) reviewed the proposal and recommended the following: 1) A platy should be prepared for Planning Commission consideration that illustrates how drive approaches, -on- street parking, and parkway landscaping could be provided on the cul -de -sacs with flag lots to minimize the amount of concrete and create a more desirable streetscene (see Exhibit "C "). 2) Prior to recordation of the tract map, a complete Design Review package should', be submitted for review and approval. The plans should address the precise grading of the tv.,Ct and the streetscene around cul -de- sacs. 3) The applicant provided a revised plan showing lots 36 and 37 taking access off Street "F." and showingg lot 35 wider to allow safe ingress /egress (see Exhibit "B "). a PLANNING COFIMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13527 - 4elcher September 28, 1988 Page 3' 4) Lot 90 should be eliminated and no other lots should front onto Street "L" south of the "N" Street intersection. Any lot fronting on Street "L" should be located entirely north of the intersection (including curb return). D. Trails Committee: The Committee reviewed the proposal on July 15-.-MB-5-n -Fe-commended approval subject to the provision for a 20 foot wide Community Trail located along the east tract boundary. E. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental Checklist, staff as en afied that the site may be subject to significant adverse impacts as a result of a location of the Alquist- Priolo Special Study Zone for the R2d Hill Fault. The applicant his conducted a geologic investigation which located a fault trace along the east boundary of the project in the area of Strer-,t "Cu. With the fault trace being identified, a 50 foot building setback on either side of the fault has been established to indicate locations where buildings could be safety constructed. With the setback being included as part of the subdivision, staff feels that a Negative Declaration can be issued for the project.. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proje.:t is consistent with the General. FTar, and a eve opment Code. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will net be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed "use and site plan, together with the reccmended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. Iv. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Reeo_r-t newspaper as a public hearing, the site posted, an notices offices sew all property owners within 300 feet of the site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map 13527 and issue a Negative Declaration. Re tfully mit d, Bra le City anner BB:SM:vc (sC ' PLANNING Cowl2$SToN STAFF REPORT E TT 13527 - Melcher - September 28, 198$ Page 4 f i I Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "Q" - Tract Map. Exhibit "C" - Cul -De-Sac Oe3igns ! Resolution of Approval with Conditions i i i I i i 4 V 1 -!� ; `yam.: i s \ , x T � . •'s- �y�,�.,, � �. ' , r ■! 9\ of ' f -\ — I -- 1 • I t F IX Z r � t 1•i . ��/ r °� . a te °� .�i j r r 1 -!� ; `yam.: i s \ , x T � . •'s- �y�,�.,, � �. ' , r ■! 9\ of ' f -\ — I -- 1 • I t F IX Z 13 11 CI I OF PLANNING DiN.'LSM m TITLE; EXHIBIT. C ✓ SCALt: IQ--7 CITY OF MoNjGA PLANNE.% D(VISM lTE l: „ ' / fs27 EXHIBIT. G'-,�'�.. SCALES - -^ M" 11 N CITY ()F RA'aCM CCXAMo' , FLxNNING D( \,ISM ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT - SONLE. i' C$T-j PLA..'ti`�;t�.t� DiTtris TITLE: SC.:.\LE: It / Am RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANtirw comISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTITIVE TRACT MAP NO. 135 ?7, A RESIDEYTIAL SSUBDIVISION OF ?52 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 88 ACRES Or LAND IN THE LOW RESTDENTF1L DESIGNATION (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET APN: 225 - 071 -65. t A. Recitals (i) Terry Melcher nac filed nn applic tion for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13527 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sebdect Tentative Tract Nap request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 28th of September, 15$8, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noti..ed public hearing on the application and concluded said 'nearing on ti?at dte. (iii) All legal prerequisites .o the adoption of this Resolution have ocurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is avu,, found, determined and •esolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that ;all of the facts t set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission du,4gg thr above - referenced public hearing on September K, 1988, including writt4- rd or_: staff reports., together with public testimony, this Commission he,—.,y specifically finds as folloris: (a) The application applies to property located at the n�xthwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street with a %ngth of 3,640 feet any+ d lepth of 1,328 feet and is presently vacant; ah- (b) The property to the north, south and east is designated for residential use and is zurr�ently vacant. The property to the west is designated for open space uses and is presently vacant; and (c) minimum edevelopmentp =tandardse or on tine i City f »f pRancho and (d) The development of 252 single family units on 68 acres of land iy istent with the Low Residential land use designatica of the General and tk -,// PLANNING CGMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Ti 1;927 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 2 (e) The proposal, with the Coiraunity Trail along the east tract boundary, is in compliance with the Master ran of Trails and the 65jectives of the Equestrian Overlay Dis.rict. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- xoferenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commiscion hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific }'fans; and (b) The .design or improvLaent,% of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suiable for the type of development proposed ; 'and (d) The design of the s0division is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans -Td wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious piftlic health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will sat conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the propc•:d subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Qualit.r Act of 1910 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a r- %gative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph � 1, 2 and 3 above, this coy mission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attache(, hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. { A. Tee.tative T. act 1. The existing overhead utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of unimproved 24th Street shall be underground from the first pole on the east r.;de of Etiwanda Avenue to the first pole off -site west of the J a projects west boundary prior to public impr0ftent PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13527 - Melcher Septer'Jer 28, 1985 Page 3 acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. the developer may request a raii.bursement agreement to recover one -half of the City adojsted cost for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. The existing overhead utilities (electrical and telecow.unications) on the west side of the dirt road within the Cucamonga County Water District easement shall be underground from the first pole rin Vie south side of 24th Street to the first pole off -site north of the north project L ndary prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 3. Twenty- fourth Street shall be constructed full width (excert for parkway improvements along the south raadbed) from its intersection With Etiwanda Avenue (existing) to its intersection with "L" Street (proposed). The developer may request a reimbursement agre dent to recover the cost of constructing the south roadhed and one -half the cost of constructing thr median islands from fuVnR development as it occurs on the opposite side of the str-met.' 4. A permit from the Metropolitan Water District is required for work within its right -of -way. 5. If the 24th Street construction and undergrcunding of utilities are done by others, this developer shall honor any reimbursement ag,,eements in favor of those performing the work, 6. An in -lieu fee for the future construction of 24th Street west c.• "L" Street shall be paid to the City prior to ape,roval of any Final Map that includes any `lots west of L' Street/ The fee shall be one -half the estimated cost of constructing 24th Street, including the median, from "L" Street to the west: project boundary, 7. Etiwanda Avenue, between 24th Street and Highland Avenue, shall be upgraded, including surfacing and an adequase structural section 32 feet wide, to the satisfaction of the Cit,- engineer. 8, If the developer is unable to obtatu the necessary off -site dedication to construct Etiwanda Avenue north of the north property line to its convergence with the existing `. alignment, a temporary transition on -site will be allowed as follows: a) The design of the transition shati be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. �[ —13 PLANNING COWISSIOU RESOLUTION NO. Ti` 13527 -, Mel cher September 28, 1968 Page 4 b) A temporary road easement shall be provided on lot 11. c) A Tree for the future removal of the temporary transition and its replacement with ultimate street imp(•ovewnts shall be paid to the City prior to approoval of the Final Map. 9. Ir off -s4e dedication is obtained from the property owner to. the norrth: prior to approval of --the Final Map, then this developer'; shell construct the ultimate Etiwanda Avenue north' of ',the project site to its convc,raence with the existing alignment. It shall be constructed full width, excluding parkway improvements. The developer coreque�c a reimbursement agreement to recover the st-; of constructing off -site street improvements from future development as it occurs.north of this site. 10. Construct the City Master !Plan, Storm Orlin in 24th Street fran the project site to the 'Etiwanda Spreading Grounds. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be cred-�ted to that portion of the constructinn costs incurred in constructing:.�)ermanent drainage facilities specified on the City's Master P1arr of storm drains and the developer shall be eligible for reimbur-emenit of allowa5le costs in excess of the-fees in accordance with City policy. Any additional costs "'for over- sizing facilities for interim flood protectScr:, shall be borne by the developer. 11. Plans for tho 24th Street Master P `Ian Storm Drain shall be approved by the City Engineer and the Flood Control District prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building pemits, whichever nccurc first. 12. The storm drain system within the ,project shall be designed to accommodate flows r;cst the property to the north upon its future development in accordance with designated tributary areas for the 24th Street,'Maste; Plan storm drain. 13. A permanent flood protection fdcility shall be constructed along the 4rest property boundary as follows. a) A cincu-ete channel s :11 be constructed, ac justified by the final drainage study approved by the City Engineer, with sufficient capacity, to allow extension of the channel along the northwest property I -ne o;1 the property to the north. It shall be fenced per City Standards. NW b) rA 12 -foot wide paved access read shall be provided on PLANNING CLEWISSION RESOLUTION N0. TT 13527 Ilelcher September 28, 1988 Page 5 the east side of the channel for its entire length with access provided at both ends public Street. c) A permanent storm drainage easement shall encompass the channel, debris basin, service roads and feraes. d) The developer shall form or annex to a maintenance asses�rcent district for this `"Cility. 14. If Southern Califorlia Edison agrees to the placement of all or part of the permanent flood Protection facility within their easement, a permit from Southern California Edison W17 be required for work within their right -of -way. 15. Interim drainage protection facilities shall be provided along tho north project boundary. The drsign sha'41 be justified by the final drainage Study ar.J approved by the City Engineer. A maintenance am- eemenc shall be executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer exd the City Attorney guarantr?ing private maintenance of the drai;.a9e protection facility by a Homeowners Association, but providing the City with the right -of- access to maintain thq facility if private maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to access those costs to the Homeowners Association. 16. 7he project shall contribute to the future construction of the Etiwanda,'San Sevine regional drainage /flood control facilities by forming or annexing, to a benefit assessment or a can nunity facilities distvict or by the payment of regional drainage fees as established by the City Council. Formation or annexation or fee payment shall be prior to Final Map approval. 17. t6. Construct a 20 Coot aide Comnunity Equestrian Trail along the east project boundary. Landscape maintenance Ma ments shall be dedicated to the City for the area betweon the perimeter wail and the right - of -way on 24th Street, Etiwanda avenue., and 111 Street reef between 24th and h „ Streets: .9. Siopt; within landscape easements to be maintained by the City shall not exceed 3:1, unless approved by the City Engines. 0. "here streets are drained to storm drainage oipes (sump condition) in easements crossing private property, the easement shalt be graded to accept and cc ^.veer overflows from the street 11, the event of blockage in the pipe or catch basin. -45 PLANNING COIrS$ION RESOLUTION ND. TT 13527 Meicher September 28, 1963 Page ,S 21. Off-site improve5eents shall be provided for each phase of the dsv.eloame!it, as required q)y the City Engineer, to provide driin4ge pru*ection and two means of acves, for each phase. 22. The earthgvaka fault location and building setback shall be shown on �ti'te ,urinal map. In addition, a deed restriction she,I be att4ched to lots 24 thru 28 identifying the location of the fault, fault setb-)cks,, and building limitations as auprovedrby the City Planner. 23. The developer shall commence, participate in and consummate, or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Hello -Roos Community Facilliiies district for Foothill fire Protection District to finance a fire station to serve tAe enve-lopmfmt, including land facilities, equipment and operations and maintenance. The station stall be located, designed and built to all specifications of the Foothill Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's pra(erty upon completion. M e equipment shall be selected by W strict in accordance With its needs. In any buil'diag of the stations, developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations., The Coeenunity Facilities District shall be formed by District and developer by the tine of recordation of the final map. 24. The developer shall' Provide each prospective buyer written Wticp of the potential Fourth Street Rock Crusher project In a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. B. Design 'Review 1. Prior to recordation of the final map, a;completz, Design Ruview pZckage shall be submitted for review and approval by the Plana ng Connission. i. A comprehensive gra,ling plan shatr be sdbr -tted for review and approval Uy the Grading Committee prior to recordation of the final map. The plans shall ad(lress the following areas: a) The maximum rear yard splits shall not exceed eight (8) feet when unretained or 12 feet with the use of a four (4) foot retaining wadi. b) 'ibe maximum side yard splits shall not exceed four (4) feet. PLANNING COMMISSION ,0E GlkTili TT 13527 - Melcher September 28, 1988 Page 7 c) Split level pads, stem wails, and varying floor levels shail be incorporated to reduce grading. d) The maximum pad -.:o ground differential of external boundaries shall not exceed eight (8) feet. e) All cross -lot drainage shall be within private ease:nts and improved devices. 3. The cul -de -sac for Street "A adjacent to E,,iwanda Aver:�E shall be designed for emergency access to the satisfaction of the Foothill fire District. 4. Lots which front onto "L" Street berween "N" and "J" Streets shall have circular (preferrel) o:° hammerhead driveways. All drive approaches on lot 100 shall be north of a projection of the north right -or -Hay line for "N" Street. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. is APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH.DAY OF SEPTE;ISF.R, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: +�arry T- Ptt'*+�ti ��rnan ATTEST: Brad u er, ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Pianni -9 Commission of thy! City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify tht the foregeing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plenning Commission Lf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular greeting of the Pliiining Comnirsion iaeld un the 28ti day of Septe•:mber, 1988, by the follwjing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: O � IC 9 • {�� O O ° :3 "Y M C fA O °. C w p. � \ < N ry �',��C 9Y V�a NYrylw TQ Y!l° i yY� �„aL os GG3 g9� §A Yww e�.��C.N ,OL (fY LAN GGnC`�wY CM w7yL+•> p N d e�C — uJ Tg uY`�ewaw'P�� �Ds.'s. of as 5 z s^ 44.rs a -� �w a c 8 d OG�w$YYA g® Y Y A GNs- N9 e =aJ 9 Y Y Y bbYp to' Y��1 .LY N�_ ... j �M. 2LnSYG Y tS 4 'N:N ' YYy O aL Y �aQ Y� # VGGI o +�a'$ w N^`�lit: C it ­ soz gSr�yN .raNN� ��� cG°��w uw a N o 9a Y snS6 nu ^. �+ sta gy ��'Yi�i. a aQw &o WWWWWW .,µn r' ae r6 Op e.Y.!a•°vi 6�A V� M'Y N °C 6L� ~ _.y !fir py�4y. GN -G~ M Mpp CNCG ■ OA. .1 teQa wYp�O y C. �'{ WY u Y�.4 L Cwt NO r 01 L i�Etw�yri C N C.^ y N G 6.NNNN!!'YL'°Ge oo TSsa LN' iCCCC k. Y nm .� M YY MMyy yo OGi +. _Q igN.6 {Y� H$ a\ �/t.�� +`•_+tea CC O ! Oi � • 7, � ' N O I N ^Qq In wo GA i � "• ep �i'�, � Q °w � JN iV! � a L' 8 t'3 W LQ i joy _ lu a °LN Y of > i+ s E$eyi"Na is7U{{'���$,q� t``u1 as X Aii V :7 a� eN d • J Y^ y an i Y S OCI . Y _Y y4� yHy stY C yy Nv..` Y .07. C � � ISM �a 73N q��M}w• F �a 6 x W OrtOW1, Poor ot.milty HIS � ^•Yas "a ? @..L YY' ew L' _v CCL � A �' � V = ° t s� eee ■u H � A ^ L � O N ^S. C Vq.MO V� ^^ NY.a ^!•Y ®. G.�O TOL «9�w LqA V Y�L'JN V�r Z'S JI- C 624- Vy C.UC WN�p ^.L�. VCCM coi8 wk ro u YyNy yr..s .Zc.� « °c a'� qr .`S w idu a,^�u �y CC CC Y yyy Y p���111 L V q�O 1 C +1 ^gq�N��1yroN j M�MA rj �.�. • Mr ZOI.. Ly °C W4�CU yy���CY.N OhC1N �roVVVS�s� +.��C�• UL °�M� Nro. ¢¢C� ® �•V.�CCI L4OA �Ym'j iNO -,l i- M ^O.�M9S NUY pa +��.y ^°m F D1 r +�L� iL AM «+`•�jA�j Taj V�wMNVJ�Y�J Ol y +iP CV d t O NQ>, ro 'ror. ^ Q� N 5 �'.rr. �." -aT�■ �� jy. `" �+3 '" ° py � °'� o N �cw °� ��'+��+•.. y+ $ 64 you �YSffl;li c»<,, . qq:Y! �; Lae �yn� YHfi i s{h�a� .u� �'66y� O�L u io 3-y LYY.'L r'g� pr « ^ «td� y Vp o _pC _ °Y w6CiM lhl ^I NI 14I rl NI v �o� ^R � tiK ac�CQ�rR 42 9"M3�i NF` -s-, ^N La � � C';,,�w 7' Y�co. ^oR o yr o0o y! ^rb' w %LpY uu ",SV y` ro6 V«Q Mme« aVCMNM..•i ^«CY aa Z ro Zu ^6NC 4y•� NN« N1►�!° �^ �6 Cs.'C�tly.RVN NC�°•J « C�. p�p CCD�+ °i �.� L�C'S Nw Ig •pi � r qy N � yC W Oy �.�._ S Pea cQ ^C LC ppLV� �O� N,�iN+ 0-0 pC NI� 7a�N ^�■ {y�qA NC Np 6pa H L ^^ _V ^.Y C� C N.LCR CN MM{.O ^i� C CDT'. ■� C =(p� t YYT Lip ^CC O ro CC �C Y°08 ��Dq mlT 1i ��••LLYY S O. OI A �dR LR i C' VLOIn C Y .1^`l�` N :,6. p'^ ■■C` VL Q.i Capry�� NO{L �� 1 y> --s9 �+c+eoa ao>.LS. t ppM IC � C� CECq� NL O-+4�d .r CSX 1(yrjj y a^]«I T V .V�9 .V..�jie,LJ. NON •:� G�C� II � O C o�� ��ro OOIro A C'CY «.� yyr9 d v �s G� C�aL OJi. O L V N G L �O a N 4°• M V4 N N M 4 .ti .x s °t n! �I �I I N N _0 1- z rs 1053 3� ci cc U J. %cc IL SS- S�-ac. N1 Z, N-5 '0 tZE § - I Fla Za u ZOO.- V ta . v 9 , k;� . I r -1 v I -W, a . K .5-1K 1-6 .5 I I- . t. 9 E f- a 4: 0 R L, '&--m "gig 20, 2- CPC k, S-4.4 ;=Igo C"v <Y ILOg6M OL: if NY - - vrdc - Z -- iii t"t 1. i T; IS Zs IV T IL w pf ris At E I 3.5 WX si gm 3.-r % Q 10 7, is rO 9t n4: ru! a jr V C-I Is E- 5.8 Z., :a 93,21 al I bu g :"oz 5 p^6. E —,N -P 'GI , GUN I. i-si &° KiF a-.; a CC- 5 r RN j z 1.0 N^ 7 u A 2 K % Z; Z p.; Ow �m Is N'" ^Y7 LYN �G ^�� `C qQC C�Ytl1C LYa Y01 "` •� • p� Y d� u L `. L C r � C � O� Q V L s y C L V o^�'^ ���•: us M^ �CC VtI w '�°, _YY �r^ . � p OY : C•YOY �= W = W �S_ 1 V IJ ^CYL ' O� V . �. 0y^ iT : v N 55. U�L . Mal �Y ' ^Y �Y ^ Q 6 Y 0 ' Q A • W LO.p N � ya. W ;^ Y L.V Lrdw al 3g� }-lac cw� c oa ail vo ° '�-vl► CC3 'N�`N s +�aYYJ '�''a ayY a�• O m, VOID pLl U� yNN YPnC L� +MC W § � � V N µ =^ Y Y�CCO CVQ Uy�C p�CY +�._.�Y� $TNQ =� � Z a�p ON {��� � SH O:L �q Y•MO �ij �s�tl'��•rx�[j S tom+ wwV p Yom. N >wwN. y0& S p�a.� ^« 7 1fj 4• O.L ^p6 L' Mu $w MM ) vqS! .YwYcay A. �c%b Yleo _aa 0pp40yy �AVIY1! +�NES yWw � 4�.,Y.� P.aY �YY N1y. ■l ll{C � 4 bb 3Y YM tt+1. YVp 0` NG+Y1ryC Lam',�. �uu®`. a s ��Gil SVLC+O NYC. � iY�Yy�y L�YVVj\Ypni�pj 30Y^'Cj L V >�La lam.. D D .{LN�.��+ Y l�rjWi 4�SOLVA 3S'agn N h �Y3 N NEMY Y! 'V:M al'Y Wp1 {g6iN�` N C Ol� IMOC.® �yC{ s9 rN y UM LN'is.� ruy V V u 6 p.CLYL. Y V ' j qvq ii Y�L Ms +wC C Qw CNMY ^WSJ] L y �Yr CN e C ^ M ^Ne n Quw yy + oe aY+v 3 �ur°ee c n uou ^F 51 �� U C w a S U G y ~ C 14v- .05 ~ C d Y.LCG + =�Y p�qW YY L 9 �LY i'1 V L CV N O..LV L^ +L ^Y .i LdC = 4. •L•s}�j}: ••~N• N60.° w° ^N `■�L. UY CV Y N �YygCpY LaY Y M iY�.ea� wn0 Nj� 6 ^r CC�O LY O•G �t L UL ^ V OIY IOC r.. Y"'Tp LY. C �Oi NN UwW �Y`yp„ Y va y C y 9 L C � N M 4 fL,l i s N _ O� L P f N l� w �. a+ pYnw.' c M u'°, U,, v�y$ U. �+ $c i� rao °oN4i^Y ca O. O V wY.S r r cy� V qac e. we ■`e c +o�LCqq^� �o�L. c. T Y Y �Mda C COQ -N■GOff w.•�a NC A ~ r gYMww ACwV r T�LC'Yw VCe�.cs Yr. ayiOrp3 YV+ ��i� Y'SN...W NL' Lb01 {` Y� L N >�V� V_^ q C ^. CC 4`. lC ■Lp_V pVV CU y N Y eY+ L CQt�.Y ^ U0.�6N �M� _tiCCN YLO Lm� O.yY N N a Y L N tt COp ■Y __ V J '�. F O w J L� � C 2,1 B ' ±�M My° V C G G g I 4�L Y01 C O A "" �'}l � ■ VO �i t ■� y � ' V 6 JJ G ` \1{ �. F�OV yY. i)V4 +N` •y OIL Nd V Y' VYJ�Y. O N.g Yx04Y zw.91 C L Y E NV Y s M OVA �O O�Y fS t• {I v �4Lt� Ya_il°C�Oy � 1r ^ Y i � � �� ��y�yw IC EV,cY�� yV� �i. pp N OI ° "yl. Ii _ 4 C V. Y G :r. V C ,,,i p ■GC s�I cN w�y L+H $ � CP 1�■ r��004 V6Y a q -gs q�Cj y� ®°� fY�a�1 Cj.� Mill. -COVVO01! Ll y� V�iN UO ^ ikG i G� COw W Q4+�M ti0 iN GS���6 P�. L� Y 2• U ey �y Ca L Q v s uY g� •� 6 O iw O V G i r „ L M O "' gV z Y O ^V <e Oy C L M g u i a.•ra�QQI `�av4' os W N v W V V SS i099 p apVp"C� V @° tVu° v V Oy~L N N R ` Y OI 'C V A )4p a iN a Vfi �uI q, waga' V $q 01VY 'Ki Qi C. � � d1N� Y'. � ^a�� pq■ +D Y real v•°,"e cy �am .9 ki •8'.'rf t - amwH. ae dnu s o d m v a A Yea :5-.a o.5� aa3s6� ^� �xan g2- e C M'`v 4 2H L -PzR €va=` � °�t3yye it 1h MppY N.O ry C.6v CoC.y O.w y'.^ NY 4 o- M � L L °. 51 q g ® � ^OEM � Y"p.�9+• 'rp ��. es i+ CwC Yi.� L •nI A� ° 'NF g�Y 7�0 Vg I�O•�\ :ems �.Y-rw --a t— aN+ L�Y�Vfw iNwO rz 4 S Ki 0 Odom Pam Quaty vY. y y '(J� C p Y 0N R.N y p E 4 aYpp .YC O y.6 L y V A',i1 F N . CI A C F ^ O «pQ ®ry ,CO:N Y1` CC RL °ytSCM yci u3 .L.. `C O w }���V X. X$.VL« ' gh rw,a 44 ° �-9 k gQgp O.°r °.yV N G _ V N v I °E Y Ott V' } st Cy LY Y 2CN Y ^2 `s.w G \O 4 Ia.' 21 QQ.. N A GO Y C M ggoo L G 2 C 'c`xt U� .G ~r ^ �eml N $=y YY L T COL L^ LU w.Y Y `.q�Yy,r •Y �v F �.r �' rw= �OS7 er7� NO PJ <L) Y •� W.MNL4. LU �p yq « $ FV C Yom I - O C �H369 ,ps L 6 W Y.w td x �4 M1O 2$ ao G� 4� r U N L Y we Y L N N po i d "� V ■C YM �y w <tJL r� i 1 ,, aLd E Y« u S N N 4 pp Yw l yyS +, J D M q N GGGG FM 4 N ME p. Vw C Y � CC .piO � o M C- Q N fi O $ay c O W w L t �J 6 Y M Wig Y C a Q w � L r, O J 4C VL y t.• i A N N C^r 2> W uM 4 Nr�4 ca. y..s Ll X2 N o 1 Y LM M N 01. It T' E >O SY `' A NaO ^Qp yy C 4 �jpr CaC.�CiF y a�' ev44 i ®p T 6y 6 G $'bC W -7,1a +! zz V yr� L,�� tr tiLCyuy M,y.CCp y �uc NL C1 4NLt ulJW.wt.. <Q1W I l �l 1� 0701 -02 0 9-28--88 PC Agenda 5-of 5 r-- �I M H W X_2-Y ea.. ca;� PI�w YY cry _YO LuYu o� ®s C C e � °u N � ww o '8' 2 $Qw ApY Y C 0 /'.3 L �O.V COw l s L a' o OL ��a Mo V O p N.O N 5 c" n oo o 4O^ Ca VVSO Y^ C� ^� e=.0 O ►q as 3c� N-V A�'� rN LO �Y.VL pL JL.D • V OV!!q� 4 � Vex 4aC O t� G N O•.uI L/G a^+ C 20IL Yq ^ �NC v N *a 1 m Y' 7 C L a �o N� O cZ 4 N C �."t► YEN 06 'Y ytj ► L OYO V 6 Y« b riI Cl I Q yyg st ■Yu. p� u 6 .5 a M ; O L D. � V A apN v lel CC^Y�� ►GG � G p6 ►> �Y@J fCCfry'ry d Y C U yy W. ` a1� G O C i M L y a.E;o x a va giQt ��g 82 ryS`a ► 4 n N O p+ L4 4< 9 r ~ 0 y V L y� L V 66 �O a�yNC 41C rA ti y y ^� L z. �Nj�iY+�. ^~ teLV 9 4 ► 9U O.` ,�^ Y L Y^ oe ve C4 i d +YU a 960 @. Yyy V Y� ` N LU ^4. LC at O O A lob- 2! �� Q. .144 N 1CN Q ^► a Y `4 wwL� Cq�1L �L�.v LO ~ ■� aayy AVCV. NV C0 OR 1. NO 4� N^N 'O V Y � � 4 ► d N .. YL 4L.6�C � C G � 4 �. N ^y 4J ' {Y� V 'w `■ Y y `� a 2 :0 ►D1 0��'N 4.r L G.Y 4u Qp E+ �� K �NI � I �� ��•I �NI � ri iN I a o X_2-Y ea.. ca;� PI�w YY cry _YO LuYu L C QL�O C► Q O M C wYP11 C C e � °u w � ww o '8' 2 $Qw ApY Y C 0 /'.3 L �O.V COw l s Mo V O p N.O N 5 c" n oo o Ca VVSO Y^ C� ^� e=.0 O ►q pOeyGV L� N-V A�'� rN LO �Y.VL pL JL.D • V OV!!q� L4q Vex 4aC O t� G N O•.uI L/G a^+ C 20IL Yq ^ �NC 11 4 v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 281, 1988 TO: Chairmin and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Plaraer BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -02 MI.LIS I C {�1 UICC unG - me aevel opmen O aD n uS ri a comp ex comer se of seven (7) buildings totaling 55,546 in area 3.13 aes of la In the Geeral Industr altDesignati n n (Subarea 5) of the Industrial n Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner o1 Fifth Street and Lucas Rt..,ch Road - APN: 210 - 071 -37. I. SACKGROUND• On July 27, 1988, the Planning Commission originally revTe`'T -We site plan and -elevations for the proposed industrial complex. At that time, the Commission stated that, while the applicant was trying to achieve a "look different than the typical horizontal banding" for the complex, the architectural program proposed was not acceptable. The Commission suggested that less extensive angled banding be provided on the buildings. In addition, the Commission also expressed concern about patio and plaza area locations and requested that the applicant devote attention to those elements. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The lipplicant has revised the building elevations to provI e a more traditional horizontal emphasis. Buildings 1, 2, and 3 are designed using a fluted band and introducing a metal trellis that extends 4 -6 inches out from the building. Buildings 4, 5, 6, and 7 are also designed using the fluted band with additional horizontal elements provided adjacen� to the fluted band and at the top of the parapet. In addition,. semi- circle designs have been provided at key locations. The applicant is also providing new locations for the plaza areas for all buildings. On buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the plaza areas have been located within the parking areas totally separated from the entry to the buildings. On buildings 6 and 7, the plaza areas are loca -,2d in relatively the same location as the previous submittal !at the entries to the office areas have been relocated to provide greater separation between the plaza and entry areas. In all cases, a trellis has been introduced over the plaza areas. I TEN 1 , PLANNING ° CObI+lISSIOH STAFF REPORT OR 88 -02 Architecture One September 28, 1988 Page 2 B. Desi n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, o eman r vie ewe a revised plans on September 8, 1988 and recommended approvai. III. kECOWENDATION: Staff, recommends that the Planning Commission review the ' revised plans and, if deemed appropriate, approve Development Review 88 -02 and issue a Negative Declaration through adoption of the attached Resolution. Res'3ppe ewl lY a tt d Bra er City Planner BB:SM:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" Revised Site Plat Exhibit "B" - Revised Landscape Plan Exhibit "C' - Revised Building Elevations Exhibit "D" - Planning Commission Staff Report (July 27, 1-`38) Resolution of Approval with Conditions lu I I 'f an, RANC H CUCAN10 PL.-VN NI.NG DiX,iS " ITE`I TITLE- EXHIBIT- SCALE. V' 4�.y��a�T�1� I ,U )R DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1 July 27, 1938 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission I Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate ?lanner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -02 I - eve. 11114 4 an n us rta coipr s oeven buildings totalling 55,546 square feet on 3.13 acres of land in the General Designation (Suba Industrial. rea 5) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Fifth Street and Lucas Ranch Road. APN: 210 - 071 -37. RELATED FILE: PARCEL MAP 1IS10 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval rslan. of Site Plan, Conceptual Landscape oncep ivaT Grading Plan, Building Elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 5) South - Industrial buildings; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 5) East Industrial buildings; Industpiiai Specific Plan West - (Subarea 5) Industrial buildings; Industrial Specific Plan (Subare2. 5) C. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site - General Industrial North — Cenral Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial F .�� A 1 ' RCHITY6 C"ISSIOU STAFF" REPORT ARCHITECTURE ONE - OR 89 -02 July 27, 1983 Page 2 0. Site Characteristics. The site is presently develoPed with bangs ''_ nom,- " ea of about 1.5 percent from north to southora9e. The site sloes the north by Fifth. Street, ®n the west b Project is bounded on the south and on eas Lucas t by existing deYelopaFents. y cas �2anch.Road,. on E, Parkin Caicuiations. of Use a Square Parking FsSpace of YUber of O to a P$ces Spaces Ratio Re Bred Provided Building 1: Office 600 Manufacturing 30fl0 11250 2 Warehousing 3907 1 /500 6 2 1/1000 4 6 1- 4. Building 2: TZ Office 704 Manufacturing 3554 1/250 3 Warehousing 3131 1/500 1 3 1 /1000 3 a Building 3! I3' 77 Office 704 Manufacturing 3104 1/2511 3 Warehousing 3131 1/500 6 3 I /1000 3 b TF 3 Buildings 4 6 5; Office 600 Manufacturing 3500 1/250 2 Warehousing 2549 I /500 7 2 1 /1000 3 7 Tr 3 Buildings 6 a 7: T• Office 904 Manufacturing 3800 1/250 3 Warehousing I /500 3 3 5600 1/1000 7 7 II. Lr Y�_ T61 6 AHA A. General: The applicant is BTU s r•ai buiidin s proposing to develo Square feet to IO g of varying sizes P seven designed with r 204 square feet in area. I'll from 6,549 a plaza area near fia the Each building is entrance of she ��r r r E-A 13 PLANNInG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT fICHITECTURE ONE - on 88 -02 July 27, 1988 Page 3 11 building. As part of the develop rent of the site, a cul-de-sac be constructed to allow access to Buildings 4, 59-6 and 7, de -sae R. _o_e_s_in Review Committee; �81aes ey, o oe design Review Committee on June i6�gg � rec hdedginally reviewedalhb to address the fo►7awing concerns. proposal e revised: 1. A five foot building setback should be Provided on the east side of Building 3. 2. Additional landscaping should be provided along the east side of Building 2, the west side of Building 3, and at the Entries I:o Bufldfngs 6 and 7. Also, a 2 foot landscaped area should be Provided on Building I to incorporate vine pockets. the south side of 3• The zero setback acceptable on the south side of Building 7 was Providing the aRPtfcant worked � _ Property owner •.o the south to worked secure the 5 foot at between buildings. ea g. The COMnittea express ^i cence ^as about the inters ^elatfons of architectural recom a d& „R "r^�ased for the project. The C+�+ittee rtcoanmende� Prepared to better �$lustrate the building design. In desi,js the Comittee suggested that alternative desiysas may want to be explored by the applicant. On July, 7' 1988, the Design Review Committee lBlakesley, y, Coleman) reviewed tl*a perspectives and revised elevations submitted b Committee stated that a combinations of - two that lites Proposed eview COW ttee for eaddit nalnd resubmitted to the Design recw'"ended that the architecture view. Also, the Committee reviewed by the full Planning Co,,,ission program the site be The applicant is in the elevations and will be submitting sthdl revising review oq July 21, I988. g the building the Planning e results of the meeting will be presented to g Commis ;stn as an oral update to the project. C. En�liroremental env ronmen a Assessment: Staff nos completed the not have an c s and deterrmfned that the project { Alannin y sf Significant adverse environmental impacts. If the will g would be ppropriatecifcthe,Priss ctce oa 6 Nega"ve Declaration V-1 PLANNING COWISSION STAFF kcM ©RT ARCW:i`ECTURE ONE DR 88 -02 July 21, 1988 Page 4 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Thor project is consistent with the General an and cn us rial Area Specific Plan. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or 'significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Industrial. Area SPecific Plan and City standards, IV. RECt?PNDATIDM: Staff recommends that the Plannfng Commission «..a era nput relative to the architectural program and, if deemed appropriate, approved Development Negative Declaration. If the Coa�pissioroR fins the and unacceptable, then the protect should be sent back to Design Review Committee with specific direction for reviiion: Resp 1Ty su ttad e Bra' % City Fl. ner BB :SN:mig Attachments: Exhibit "A. = Site Utilization Map Exhibit B Parcel map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan X E i bit " Exhibit Exhibit "E" - tsndscapalpian Exhibit "i:" Original BuiidYng Elevations Exhibit "G" - Revised Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions e ?PEN RE 60 � CONST. PNp G y' 3 G p a—TRACT 13!81 • cc �. OPEN 5TORAre I W a Z r ' W ! ✓• lyil t �� 0 u NI ��110.ESIILE ! / w!'tt� SIN BERNAROIPIO -.••, AVE" -NX WTI RANCHO CUCA ti K), rre PL -k\ \ I.\C DWLS �PIT"d.E: ,_ ��i fit'• %•��! � EXHIFtIT. •---- K A *T CITY OF j PLA NNI.� Dtt`I$ TITLE: EXHIFIT SCALL - �w.1r�•� t = —=•a.� F1ETl+ ST7tCET ._.1 .� .,rte •4-- - -..s{ + �. c , A. p s.w • � �tqe+wa,eo avtWi K A *T CITY OF j PLA NNI.� Dtt`I$ TITLE: EXHIFIT SCALL '-- FIFTH STREET + —+ DG 9 BLJG. 2 ''-+e =j � BLDI�i 3 �., , .,� .•�. 1 t � r�� cc !J�FEL.Lu w t ./ ♦. ..fir ` !- I i � �` ; � t� ,fir y [ � •, 11.1 yy V 0 �M /w .r I 1 L a Y• i v bRy •.i �< BLgG. 4 so t--'�� —+ BLDG. d_ ' «.. ..• n�J � 1 t 1'T T .q. .. �•� , ..� I �I = NEW COURT + OL Y�V I '• i ', • a..,.c, .n.�a n I �I2 "�'�+...�. ' . 1 w ti w.., pa .. •. �.: .+ —'°'— t zo . " + 1 "A WTI CIT IF of RANCHO CUCk.,%lo PL.•�.ti `[�iG Did "I5IC� TtT1.E:: �_� t �'' ,�� EXHIF4T: V-13 FIFTH STREET ; a ;�- BLDG. 1 _DLCIG. "" " balk. �• I Is n 3) ff "f— • 1 � t o . Is BLDIG. 4 r. BLDQa �� ' NEW COURT BLMG sra� ter.-- :=-�•: _ - • _ ~ �" �'— �. t BLDG. 7 i oi( WT CITY ()F RANCHO CL.° ►A: , ' `A 1 'E°!t• - "Mg -dam EXHIP.I'T: If I y ^m— SPOW * a. . rfrreo ur ro t+taer rww�s. ►cM *WJ6W v,MV cZ+ta cr< f�` ww"6 ii! gill ,�{ c ■ NEW COURY K"d M-w nw sr ra Y. w 1 • i . Pro"tfea�N � 1 I. rV L W" M6n0M. II 1 1 i y imp+ :V(lftit 4'y'i d Y ()F ' RANCHO CUC-k.\lo uvsm E NiRiT: SCALE Ik CITY OF RANCHO CUC-�.Njo%A PUNNUNG DIN LSM, ITEM: °�ssw EXHIPAT': � -7 SCALE Ll E NOPT: ! ELEV. - BLDCti 1 C.'I'Q{ Y OF rrF-% TiTt.f.= V.-/7 P ^ OL4S& 8 RANCHO CUC-k.%Io% PL. -,LN, i.NG L x -sm, SST « ALD9, 9 tT m.- �. ' -dam TITLE EXHIBIT= SC ALL : v' -r� E 11 E n " u1W ww. r,-r miner •n.—' C.'ITI, cam' RANCHO CUC-k.NION, PUNNING DR I5�I`,' q wnr mLM s TITLE: EXHIBIT: d SCALE V.,, 7 • �' e� �•r �� .�....,,.. �� ® �� ev .ems �� v. -WAIM 1. Vie* � ♦ + 12 CITY CF RANCH() CUC-�.N 6 � PUNNING Di%,LSIO!`,` i TITLE: EXHiFAT- SCALE veto Ll CI' RA.Nk CtCjN joNGA PL.ktiti%; Ddi'LSM ITEM: TITLE- r,7rs � EXHIPAT a,A SCALE CITY (E h 0' T J • U •1 � 1 ,.i TITLE:, c�/sad £YHIFIwT: ALL V Z z'i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE WCHO CUCMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88 -02, THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX COMPRISED OF SEVEN (7) BUILDINGS TOTALING 55,546 St'jUARE FEET ON 3.13 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL iNOUSTRIAL DESIGL°ATION (SUBAREA 5) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FIFTH STREET AND LUCAS RANCH ROAD - APR: 210 - 071 -37. A. Recitals. (1) Architecture One has filed an application for thr approval of Development Review No. 88.02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thi9 Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "tha >Application ". (ii) On the of 28th day of September, !Gd8, the Planning Commission of the City of Ragtno Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meetin_'t on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Res&ution have occurred. Is S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and rssolved by the Planning Commisiilon 'if the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby *specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Fifth Str-.a.. and Lucas Ranch Road with a lot width of 324.01 feet and a lot depth of 480.02 feet and is presently improved with two structures and an outdoor storage area; and (b) The property to the south, east and west are designated for industrial uses and are developed with industrial buildings. The property to the north is designated for industrial uses and is presently vacant; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) The development of the industrial complex is consistent with the General Industrial Designatiort of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. Vo- Z3 PLANNING.CObrssrON RESOLUTION NO. OR 88 -02 Architecture One September 28, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission heresy finds and concludes as follows; (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the prop—esed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site iA located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and (d) That `he proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public heal'ch, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the pro,42ct has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Cua?ity Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. `. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and s above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set iarth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto cnd incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to contact the property owner to the south prior to Issuance of building permits about securing the five (5) foot area between the existing building and the proposed building 7. 2) Building accents shall be provided at the northwest corner of Buildings 1 and 5 and at the southwest corner of Building 4. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The roll -op doors shall be painted to match the primary color of the buildOg and shall not be accented. Engineering Division 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88 -02 - Architecture One September 28, 1988 Page 3 1) Overhead Utilities a. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Lucas Ranch Roza shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted chit amount times the length from the center of Fifth Street to the south project boundary. b. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication) on the opposite side of Fifth Street shalt be paid by the City prior to issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -halm the City adopted unit amount; times the length from the center of Lucas Ranch Road to the east project boundary. 2) The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire off -site property interest necessary to construct master planned stone drain line 7 -F. 3) The developer shall construct master planned storm drain line 7- F to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The cost of construction of the storm drain shall be credited to the storm drain fee for the project and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per City Ordinance No. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the fee amount. 8. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE my OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. airman ATTEST: Brad u er, Secretary i PLA- 14NING COGMISSMI RESOLUTION NO. E OR 80 -02 - Architeture One September 28, 1988 Page 4 I, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Planning Cc:-.-,jission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutiun was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIOMS: NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: !I- A At FAV Original ' u b ,. G L AY W.LN 4 " a ..A q •C Mx 40 .014Q A O °^ A� 9�4�Y �1° �C.5 ='►.two vim. uYg w�roNw° „GQ.� eIL L o� °Q��O ewM w Q n ! s C V rzuIIL y` ^+2 ~ 7L�Cj„q�ewvy�0 N`S V VS G' ■yC Opp Y iq yyCN e� VOMY VL� .Y.:y iYVYQA 6.1 C4 ®O .aa II Yy`d�err dgypl+c yN- QNO5yy G1 + Y V L Y. O.T G 6LOp, VC Vyw ►{N{11.N y{y� -4 Ypp-y F�CCE YY bd�4%a SQ/47 ~.O�tN 32w• C s GQN ■O 416 xY +�VNU� «1 +Qy 011Ay�l � ^�' GC��Y NBC �� ^�Mo XA6 5� N A� 4Cr 417s CCO��Y 6 M� fir.. it i E4C »bYrv. qQ 44 ®CVe`}. Y2-== .�iL,G JG �p Y p.. d ��VN J tLOA �r SHE YO HCY �. N yYpp{ SE aa�N{C{�1a LyY MY yyNNy� $C j�.. 4.4 Ire A C Q O 3-9Y .G.4Vg � C w^ MYi. NYy� YS S. Y om^ OG�Nya Ea I WCCCCi$� A 92-i A sN.u.Y1s; oil =s BYoi� cl Y W O G a a z S u u a� 2 N O 2 t:Y A- 2,-G1-p- M L D 1� uC �. �.. y1pyw y1 �'H�ug O1 y}6 H c ti f L L W CYD. 6 uC ryaOG�pN�. >�qq b awi cli {��p >��ariom a" y d Og 7{'u W go ON EGr ^ YYI. Yyt °��� u ffi� s tee 21 1gaxe R g C Y Y %! w C3 O Y A nM ^ •• �Ic i s ? e C.N. s N a a t a I (C1) 4�2 Y rIP s° �aii oah Lo�uo °LLn N 4C Z. Y C m5 mYYp'a OY.^p4 y Y . tl � N0qM V v ' V V N ^ p 4 L Y A' 9 ss V G � g $„C W Y� •y Y °- '• C � r a ^„C^� tGM a rw�Yb a 'LE y 6- E J N C y . Qsw b^r O . Oi Y N w a s t iL N°L V ` a°.Ya YruaCCi +' v+ .L WC '• 0. ti ^�YG i 6 C g N• O L N �, °I 0 4 Y N �► b M tQ�OON YL`S•G YJ.V L Y Cif L r =�.M� O1 � � O C {{`�� l Cd H aWi w O sCQvl L^ y Y« I V "� 'q�Q Ld�}g0 �p0�4�N�' L~D�d Ve �� YV� � • .A�C� N� `y. °a tg�c s.:pYO��w wai ��w.rv�`gv �oY�d c• pp C tNA �p rrii My_yi L y C _y y �+,GC�..�V Y p'C S-r p�NIStsi E'« NZ ^pyygty `Nr ° N L i'� N � ' � t` � � ^ C Y � Y4 Cp M b q q CC Y MMM111 CL� F tl _Fi M�Spy V�0.�yy �•�p+iw�"'r Oa�j�.0r.se. �� L t6 49 Cp Oi .. VL.6cv V'Ri '~ YNYN qi Npii °� V6{iq 011 qu.y � �6iu �e � a••.: �<ae _n��`c. {�Yi[ C.-K. p�p..+...y.L+�w `uy a°�ppi io�'Q.ai' (C',, �F ms �f L}J"'' C ���i �N� H�a Ntgf -5 dii 4 `,FN CIMa� GG. t`.RM� VSdY °c Cie app o.a0..c ��N° .=. vl '� 6ew..�iv �o)'. «YCLYx sYa•s< g 4 2 t 1. O w w �^ ` i•' C Y w 4' q l� = w tl 4 N id 6 O rJ u �.0� O.Y 7ytL tit i+ �d MY{i�ii rN�1yY�pi VNY.S.M �Y�L� Ld:5g1V d L q aN NL�O. p,q0 M'b' VC igg°•. WM .c re y w ■� q^ pp4CT ��. CYO Y O il.Yn Yw�i QM Yi•�. NL Lq.aR � re ~aLiiN,O�^ N3 : &{i,Sze yR�pp'^ >v ab e` Y _e ��Naa. }]• F3 QNb'gV igyE� ^ V 53- ~ Y p 0.q C1 w � YC � .. fi L a^ ` Y L-1 �j � uy f tq 6 V i Q ° _ q .934 O L 2v -p M rY + F �G C Yw L3� nQ YC(✓e C WO'�bNdN4y Q� +G ON CVAy�p .i ]G N6 w+ L CNN >Y C F;4 Y6 YCL COa61 $O CM Mr eIC C�p3 b + J -t V� qyC M� 36. C' L 9C dw rYY.aC M O'i° Lo M�'yy� 3a�V Y■ Lu4CN Vq ®' 9�CLgC �Ko-�pA p�OY VOYyfct E= OA�■ L` r�J (OLO.. yyiz .8. �p CwJ Np M.NY. L. �. L` �M. f• k4 ^a O.^ C YC 0��� yd =V O'MVYC�� ^0� CG NOC [�'•O �C & qr V�> 0v7 a °O C C �C 11LO'O ^.qr 000. °� A.°.. e-. C C YO 3.� OjY�M �.3 OY r {�. i N O Y L rpp V O � Cf N 01M V r■■ V L b L ))9 NOWr90 Li 4 V L pL6 b d'6GO Cqa 4:_4=i _> ..Y L G V Y f ®fi ^Ci. Uii IO.�V [iOpuL. YSY Yv1 W yV V OM+wy Q q C. 6 a�i N 131 1L" L N Ga :2 2 N ,i if � V -O C' ii. Bar � H Y. Y N C q I� am-,. . V'�� R-- V a Original Pw Quarry VIVYL IIV!f0 �1 }CO C. C OC O' po�Cp cw�y}V `.VO �Ye.V ' Ld LLU d, YQ d�W 6w US peY Y IO�YA p ILS egG LM4p 4N C� CC`idid °QdYL ^I��� O O� O^ CW C�y�^I�ymaLC'L ^Y OAOIC AN SGiI �4L ��1A ���/�O N oO~ I• $ qM Vr �Y/ tl`V'��1��aS.Od N ®��u1Y Lq 470i1� C�C9 �g014 N4 8y•�� Yur �� L1J�m LO 4 ya0 �V CV Y ^M .Y^� G IG �N00 _C �C CY"�� _ VWCi1 33 i, dN' DC \'4PY•d.N lb �r+Vp CLd 9VLG '�pN ^LCC. r-�VO �61 CV9 ♦�^J O/7 �y �GO/�NV`�wy�'Sl {31N� Or NO yL/��. =C CNN ^Qtl ^ �{� NdQ N�a A. dCN�N r'�^CC �OK Gy a� YYY. Y�yC dOlTff'Y y�4'p @QC Y L� yON -C�A4� NCp YCY ^q �J UMC 0 p� 00 c Y�NY^ 6�C4 �L N y 7V y�jw D�GIe�f� gSQ� 0.�Za '22 ^ YNf� V y NM g s 5 ro �� S O _CNV4 9^ YDN L'L KNM4L ^�Y.Qm 4x L ��ad pid�9 N' 6 qti Ol� sV vd 'G':nVffi��in��q L�Vt QA`s i� V 44v. °.v uio LG �Y ono�NM pp �fAf •p vLiii Sj �.1L CC-O 2-W 4 C NC �C4 uM V D y Vr YS47YGY L �N L V C dl4 _CY V n�wQ tf (� i4.awx p� NNL OLIY I.JA NO�LL J 4 C+�w. `' yMU >.0 q VccQ N° p�c1Cy1 t{ai� Lq�yppL��OV ACIpvOM L H'^k9N f.N^ KN iNQ 1"�Mi LN V��m�OIp ^ G d Y N Y eq• �LLV KOS ii: <V CGLY W tlA4N F1 1�1 0 Y V• C C N� 9 Y �.ridulcial.�s- G� a w LLU d, YQ d�W 6w US peY Y IO�YA p ILS egG VS C ^m «`uY°`� C Y. j�p�� .L3 W, GN VO S� 'a 0�0 V 4b ^O Y nalYN N •„ Y N^ a O } Y M" CO^ �s.yyeg �� Q C N Ga4.i -dw NO C.. O N d 9dG Y4O M013 Od.N G ^G 4 .r N y0 LY a9 D V� O. �,Y L y T ^ 7 L• LC X 4 �� ■ CN Nulgd Ol ■■4a. s a N« Y�Y^ NM 6 LC �� `a is Nv^ yMCCy vd ei °.v uio w= M., 4 22 9024 '=O L a ONd C 4`L, 4C� �. _ 1d'�! L� qyC �YS 9 G 4V 9'L.LG G q p 1y¢`1� g Y N Y eq• i 4` Z Sew M - C^ L L pL Cd t^ N^ N d O Y L Cd 6 Ntls 6C«+ LS�C 9 aSyt V yam° dYB wd1 A YA YyOY ■a .d. ^6"p Y aC^ dpN `4 CyyL p. <Mat Op■V■ ^�+ <il.m U a ^t�N :corn yJ� /-oN i'u ^ VYL 11 �v rol°n�4 F1 1�1 0 I I N d C 4 J f"f Y V• L 7� N� 9 Y �.ridulcial.�s- G� LLU d, YQ d�W 6w US peY Y IO�YA ILS a �6 qu Vp P «`uY°`� C Y. j�p�� .L3 W, GN VO S� 'a 0�0 V 4b ^O Y nalYN jies$�q �_ CO^ �s.yyeg �� Q C N Ga4.i -dw NO C.. ^ N^ 4LUw. 4YpiCp Y4O M013 Od.N G ^G q� IdY'1^ V C G'�IY O Ad Yq �% C 3 db t 1W.- d'C A 4 W.'U ^h^ 44 'x ;�Q .0 ell CCAaC f0 C 10447 WOU. Or VfS� I I N d C 4 J f"f w iilCi ��$ �L arc �r��� yr ,a.. y ,��s. ^; �•c. oN � u a•a � �L� �CC aY•yL `L� � m'R C~ �G.wj�CY 4CL .0 �N �M1!e� 94{Y arQ1�'� �NfOj � � CW� �~ =Y� LV��• GY• k4� x u0i.'4VC {.a' lyr..0 00 C y Y ,•'d.. 4 y .2 — Z a IJ O y C'. q Y 6 •M Uj o ^uG Y6 =om (°aj_GN_ Z+ "'v' pi eo sM3'X°CC'� Q• N %N Po 4ug4..M aea u.�;o ca+�dw. aCN y ■¢ � ��1a •b'r a;�. -a $W. p. ` Fa V6 buOV 5S wYO• ►M a-1 -.- w. Y © it A z C�9 4 ap w = Y MCC. G LL z Y V O C9 Z. BY $9N M y2t L�svI�CyAQ•1. utl CgC lfll N�T b� Cg0. y A ^ ®Y ®gdwV' YyaT'rx¢4 t' Y. �p _V $Y gL?YwY.D atY. ip. 8 8C +R d� &aa •a• �Of C.� ,p ^Cly P4A�yy p.nV �oi'K�. � •» 1�. S DaYyr p•y"4 A ai Y C>pq�wq r. �tA afa b T— C M ti w T t yLp� law's GC >L^ � H +�. CN iIU QLa:C 4 p Vw J v C' Etl�i � M W 9 q C 4i _N. iLyG Yw Q001 nw ai C 4 44 �NS NyT^ Hit qw Fc <o$ Iw�7i N LI�L. 4�b�kW Y•: �•s.ca N Y� al 4 Gw 00 CCyU C C�. wsAr� aa nC9 in a p �Lw in cEp ° �$•pg�' s i,''�. .�wv K p dp �ypi u 3•' y o ® °, s em _aYL a +pC�!• as X-5 ^.'� +4• C: V!f's CV Y 4Wi:.y Ny, �wr R y� YDr ;4`C b 4Y�V� yyO YtKA A^7 '` b' V TAM i`bl O1 Fy j C Qp Y yi6 wy. V ill.. q 4C4 p • YO�p ZH O Y Lw� SYw v V NtYC� ti �Y Y _3 r.0 zaa V q rMl. 64.GplL MR N d YAK 44VL a�Cd OG O Yb �jM NMN 4 tl� y4 O >• A.0 O ■ryG dLY L K *+CY7 U � � �p'V aa. �ara i wf CC� eYl� Z4A AK �KV C�yJ�a 4y 4aMA N M. 4 w^UY AL au 4 ;,d C.O N V Kw�UrT t-.. yYL `NAY V A.aA{ N w L•yyPy CKC {Y�H.�, KN� BE Y��`C � GF CpN£ q4 opOV � V ®NYp LL NLAd` 4 ^L C yNK R� >.� 0nrS LT tiaVCG VCn �T�V. �wy'b Yn _Q L vi ��w $w V ..~. V N9 C »Q�Y ; w AY q� }}• Hg a4VVM. ' �. ..Yi 7p+4 a7 C w �a0 Cg j% Nli 4Nn^_. �NiO KQ - v..'�yN1GM r v. N.q tR?LIII MS R �pO �G M+n OG�r OwM �' A� Aor3 c YCKLr G N KG Ya+ h N w ��.rLi. K w af6 nN 0a u N Y A's o 6 11Nw y gi-IN 1 \ •G •r y`S V -..30 1 c.. Lj 6fi 1 Poor Qua* (((y00 C Op Ceps' C �NO,pC L■ I pLG ■ O LA LM.i p ^:; �CyN p L y p L. q. 49. ,GN y ■4 7.L9 se PWydec °70y� CSY �►> y rJ 7 ^O� LG a p C ■ N` �� X t C' s b� V p+ � s4. � m Y. � 'y C' C A O � p. yam^ y� Y �+ Ypp a1 6 N' c4xa O VI N LO YI'�C146iw^ N� � ww p�G ii 'Od 4M9 R CC �`� y t�pV 19C�` f -C�y ^iYyt + �O YO � u Nwq Cp■ 4C 4 7O L 6• L N�� L G M +�� a+ G� Y Y M.b N �' p� L �i _N 34 C X�d VSy CY VLT�yn� Op: ^Op q�y q V Ly s N 6�1� M �y lve IL 9 YyA vs O py91�0 Qy.CLp..YYY U fat ySV 6N =�.. rL� �yyy4/ 6yy�i. y.B 12011 KOYO OIbT O 4C� py 3�N 3VO bL V' O YY� LC ¢�.. Q ^w�tVY O 4 y O O� wLi.� 4p10 �N �O'.�L6 0.y . (3� ^( �•i i �( �2p W at Cd OC .m tcaYy p� ORYy LO.� s 01La{� 2 Y 4� LOY N 1O OMCA 01a t.7pCp C Y <G� Wq Y ^ CS +y. L��ta• LC17 «'s... ^N Om d 'bC so0 � Op� y �V ~/{ 01�. ^ w��� 15"�� L �PV. YC 3o C11� Az1��11 4e4iH .. yL O 01 �V Yyy ■■■■�� VyIV.N Vo 0. Oycry LaoeC�pM Abp L9 O'er OA NA mx N AML 7 C C TY d � �.~..p� ^� �' �A ®� Aa GV ..� 7o �i' yLi44C. a�f1. ^ p ^'`NSA. wa�p .�3 L,Vp.�g� A^ G7 � V � C1�am: aY1 n1 d v0 OM N Ya^ OY�..:6 ua ■pp■y V O N J � 6• yQ� iEO O '� y .".^ L� L O O � � LMO O y� y� wV y6 rV NC�NYI f�C �'! �iyMC` $6yM O4v V yl. Y ^ C.iC � C�� 4+Vf� �ryV�� ■ C � � ' �. O F,L�9 �LN �pA Y. C. �.L ( 6�. rs b QaM L M4yN. C uhf L. d J^ Dy Wit§ YC CNIO `as4. qqQLO�1 4� wSO. {y�Q G NM ,.'M LLVp aOY.O NtJ ^'�. YQV BE ��No C c U YCi C C tlaC .a Lp ya�]]NSNiihY ��p N O O N� N� Y_9V 3 a7 NQ. Y —mail n9 d N G N V 6wL ^� .� Ccy� yyCCp'� ii"�os CI CYC NCC �L NO CJ ti16t4i �p N^y Cp C Op. per. y C7 OO? a'.,L wea a+Vyf7 cc ~y VwI C. ^ 1.2.2mrl Zw� COi @=y �6t pL V NO ��. b� O�Ny1' yV }YYC �`® VqY O1� O 44� 4y ✓ ypy LN by b YrrY O V LN � CI+ =..pQ� -.t0� C� OYC LCL.! JI O`�a NL4. ~y.'6� V ^at VyOyL V �YONw. i.A V.O OQ��s L ■�1MHO W�10 4JY1.) 06 V70.1 OD tN YCaG .� L; <01V LN Ira � q Q y 6fi 1 N a a W C uN a � a w oN tz V SYSF r.. �uN,F V C 4Yi `•L Ll r 1L'a��'iurl'�� y;�:; ��� {,� d « y a ;.� w 4 W p�p p «1.L 4Y L t STC �' O L W NA op«4 � q y rd A O N 54 N L p N� Ytl t �y G N YaL� �V1 N a • q qC. t1 �Q V... 'aw ■■QQ HQ�V aMe Or • b « �''O L W V `„. y Y Carl �tl IL N.^ w Nyo¢�f V�• "' v.Y $ Q X •�� ,q N b � p Y 46.N� q A � 1. 4 �^ �t G N G� h� V. � N � � q •.:.. Y p• C C � j+0+ N L■ Y�O «G V K N. � V4 N 611. 1GyV Y 4�L ~2 T �4C - f Cq. ^C . G�pN� t. yffia« .p y�j a fS4f q^ S OLC.t ■ �d�. fr .•({w,G? pa 9 L «y y•� pcg�a L_�` H-3 ^NY �C1 yY M q`yYO LV YY y 1 "MZ{ e Y YdI M. ll. N `� NN V Y tb4 L W y �Of if q V NC TQ�N LL m 4•rY 1iLM. Gcq�pyV $LaC� 140 y� „y V O cp�ff Y yS V> bL K: '�Y sSt Q �Y ia'!q� �w' ii Nob 4Y L� wV �LV aG« {G•O ' �S�L LO 4 Tdd L yw:0 L6V _CY �L ��� y4 C w ��^ yY3V• ^Y � yWgY q� µt�p - �a ~ ^w`S agN3 V V L M ea+_oagdryy bQ �=i CVyyy tee: C u Y Js tw_ aiq`_w 3. q C�_4 C^ V -fig g ^O w°� Mr CAN _Y V •rV. t� i UT, Y�Q$ «�d u" as- 'L�SnL iL V d 1 q � I l uN a � a w oN tz V SYSF V C 4Yi r M A by Q �M d « a V 6 Y �� gtuy4�« YaL� �V1 W C Op q yy aMe a.V NN a all v.Y wY OwYY �' ■e W CC NYyC 1p¢ y§ s 6! ,+^04�{0• CYw �vYe■^ 4 µ N lei i. ; G 5 R � V4 N 611. 1GyV 4p.,h�1.'~ 4�L L VF CbL*• T �4C 3a L ^C d« G�pN� t. yffia« .p y�j a fS4f q^ S OLC.t �II�i pcg�a H-3 aTi& $ a YL W NL:� N� NN p tN L L\ }S ri pq p W Y p Y q« V SYSF N ow�4 L �� gtuy4�« YaL� �V1 W C Op q yy aMe a.V NN all v.Y OwYY �' ■e te ,+^04�{0• CYw �vYe■^ 4 µ N lei i. ; G 5 R � V4 N 611. 1GyV 4p.,h�1.'~ 4�L L VF CbL*• T �4C q NV Q T V V Yu1V? �.w 4. �eN Lw.w `�+c w+ aLi° y Vy �rV fS4f q^ S OLC.t �Z •J V V SYSF LAII D N Yy W c.�J r i o= mV ndr original Poor ou"Ilt s t n� awa: � C C =, N d y y V o Y2` V 8 C 6y L. L GA V �N> N U C' Y � Y aL 0 Y C 6.2 � L C i10 C L 010 W C� 9 q, > O i va s E P ^�^ V+� �xa x�r • b- -via w� o is Y aYi S ��E VM GV` ON~ q Y� 0.JGi Ji, e ZGm rM2 Y f w Il �p NY an 009 wT`j ~ V n c= Yy W c.�J Y ° L Y- a 0- � C C =, N d y y Y2` V 8 C 6y L. L GA V �N> N U C' Y w L Y Y C 6.2 G L V 6Y N�M i10 C L 010 W C� 9 q, > O Y � •C JOdff�9 s E P ^�^ V+� �xa x�r • b- -via rciw L S ��E VM GV` ON~ q Y� 0.JGi Ji, e ZGm rM2 Y f qV 009 wT`j ~ V » Gp. wYYyW W wdq V YV L'�i 1' Y, CSCG^p r Gr N G Y L L `' � i. pw .°1•NUS�. �,Lw �.�9v ~V•rC 4 O�� L QY N Ly 9V �4 a�NY N�N� D Y ^` z z e L � Y. V r > Y V Y V CO LZ L �JO a `N Vy'yV CC " a Y 1yy YO aq. Y >> yy W y■ C. n C G O Q V. 6 C M D 6 Y GL yy O ^iD iG7 LL �'AQ� d ~ q4 ■ Ct q � Y L a —Z a� {��y� a J W 4+G. L Y L A �.• N L Y f d V t G. V L C � a C 3 O r I n c= Yy W c.�J Y ° L Y- a 0- � C C =, N d y y Y2` V 8 C 6y L. L GA V �N> L• N wca.•r. U C' w L Y Y C 6.2 G q C ° �ly7 GG q, MYyQ •C JOdff�9 WAN x�r y GGd 4 NECµ rciw L ��E oa ca(� q 0.JGi Ji, e ZGm rM2 M f L` �. �l DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA;;IONGA STAFF REPORT aepzemoer au, iv Chaii -man and Members of the Plaamng Commission Wiliam Silva,Deputy City Engineer Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer Status Report Pedestrian Acccess Easement located between La Paz Court and Avalon Street (Tracts 12830 and 12726) I. Background On April 13, 1988, the Commission heard a request by property €wners on La Paz Court (the Hillgate subdivision west of Beryl Street, see Exhibits "A" and "B ") to vacate a pedestrian access easement. The easement, located at the northerly end of LaPaz Court, serves as an access way for pedestrian traffic to and from the Hamilton Ranch. The residents of LaPaz Court ;reported accounts of vandalism and requested that the access easement be vacated so that a permanent fence could be constructed to block pedestrian traffic. The Commission concluded that the easement should remain open, and that the gate constructed by the homeowners association to the north (Hamilton Ranch) should reduce the apparent problems associated with the pedestrian access easement. The questions was to be reviewed and brought back to the commission in a report of how the instaallation of the gate was working. Il. Analysis On September 9, 1988, staaf met with Mrs. Mariza Navarro who resides on LaPaz Court, (spokesperson for the Hillgate residents) and who requested the vacation. Mrs. Navarro stated that there have been numerous accounts of children climbing over the fence while traveling to and from Hamilton Ranch. She has taken over 20 photographs of activities occurring at the gate from men working on the gate tc children climbing the gate. It has not been substantiated whether the children in the photos are residents of Hamilton Ranch, Hillgate, or some other development. Mrs. Navarro also stated that there have been accounts of littering and verbal abuse. Item W Planning Commission Staff Report Re. Pedestrian Access Casement at LaPaz court and Avalon street (Tracts 1283G and 12726) Se; :tuber 28, i988 Page 2 On September 21, 2908, staff spoke with Tracy Sherman who is a reve entative of the Hamilton Ranch Homeowners. Association. She stated that she is not aware of any reports 0 complaints to the association from either Hamilton Ranch or Hillgate residents about the gate. She did state that, on approximately three occasions, the dead bolt lock on the pedestrian gate had been stolen, Hamilton Ranch has had to replace the lock. each time, While tts. Sherman did not know wha tole the lock, she said that this only happened soon after the Commission meeting in April and that they have not had any prcblems since.. The gate continues to provide pedestrian access to and from Hamilton Ranch. As long as this access is to continue there remains a need for the Pedestrian Access Easement. There is no action required of the Commission on this matter. This report Is for information ;purposes only. RReessp7e'ctfully submitt d, William Silva, P.E. WS:WS :Jmb �%r Z 1 lu v O h Zjl �Q Cil X ``.` :'�a a a'• w 0 a 0 Eli 11 ,�;���a' Xune't5, 1988 Manning Commission Dept. Rancho Cucamonga, California Subject: Vacation of public access easement bet °aeen La Paz Court and Avalon Street (TR 121Z0 & 12726) i � t FX Elm M" ±f We are not tT,ying to hurt any one. We just want Liberty and Justice for all. I want a safe environment in which to live, work and play. It is very stressfull to live under these conditions. When the Hamilton Ranch kids are going by I take my children inside the house because they are harassed by the children passing by. Phis problem i- rubbing off on the children because they hear their parents talking abtkut Fillgate people and the children think just because of that they can harass the children from Hillgate. It's very hard to explain to a 6 yr old that he can't visit his class mates because he will be harassed by the children r and adults from Hamilton Ranch. I'am so worried that one day my children will get hurt. It feels like I live next to TISSR. My friend from Hamilton Rarch is putting her house on sale in June. She is .having a lot Of problems with the people and their attitude because she is friends with someone from Hillgate alsobher childrec have told her that -:he other kids don't want to play with them because they are friends with kids from Hillgate. People from Hamilton Ranch 12bel us as trouble makers. We have to take care of this problem once ane fot all. It am worried about the future of our children in this community„ Children from Hamilton Ranch don't have any respect for people that live in the Hillgate Community. I have been told by several of my neighbors. A hearing took place in ancember 1984, but we just found -rut about it in February 22, 1986. The decision was made when Hamilton Ranch and Hillgate were empty lots. We were not given the opporw tunity to vote or speak about the easement. AV N ~7 of the hearing here at the time that. were alf • Cai: had only the reside0 SPeaK in the�r a eh ghat the ail �er�eT�cyCCess' ortunity a by State and e the oPP ll Mr' a'r 1.'raS far Pedest been designed. to yjeari. t the public altern hid S on texna -- ve d wi {h that the al ganch)• ut the ,orke ilton s abO ted- gam hb °r 4jb Mr • Pagtj std ortherly tract ' a �sY Of my ne g °n xQmes. en K wer le,aent t it►fOrmed n Sher vE`s from Citati g we asked comp ei Y was never Qf the re,?'r tat -,ton gai.ch -pea-pie es, h stated' e s by any remOi'ed by ami Citati °n om at is a IacC Saw the fence bt oe gePresenta'ive to d° With them`n� T die asked p we wade, Sal anyth the drat Thr. 1srY We don,t have t working on a thing worry' are �'ls he stated „he sam to live in t e ash ivate Community+ t veral times and ,� you are 9Oint'; pri tiOn se to O�en ce, tihe ss,me goes is nOt going the sales offs e ,t worry it dis9laY at g of the Sam a)on on e a Cal de Sac' was nO blue Print re homes and piCt not vndersts"d ,.ISO there of minitu a e Print S exP ce. had a disvla'Y they show me blu training or erien they Only Also if th bale any mOneY- on the wall• doll i to s We pay cd extra read it beOau$e - r t to „lk because there hold to this ,Was a P ,t have We Were told Children don a mornix►g• a hearing All the elementary ,., in the the sign for om liar, 3. m 1 r ,. Picks the children yes than w days swing the are t%40 e Was install the gate is t-nere g on the door areas a 'the g �1oW that That g c osted' than area by 1 Set hurt• Also the kanc like to Plao t and someone Wi the xenCe everyda ate to dell ver d lso iumP Over the g r0 J.ems in an e TheY a umP having P ,�7e gat d. 88 p•m• and others we are still haste potential 9/ risZa man on 4 visit theix fr >ends tY►eir goods s or te .parking • �.� •.. g with h Wdim On November 7„ 1987 a . ign was posted f}lcina C s our Community with a message, "NO TRESPASSING' "VIOLATOI? WITZ PROSECUTED ". The illegal sign was taken down by the City Of Cucamonga on February 1988. The lock on the gate was changed on 4/21/88 and on 5/12/88:, 5/1/88. We can reduce potential financial ,losses to the City of Cucamonga anh in,4=ies to it,s ^itizens. Wbeax acc. 5nts happen everyone loses. I whish I could get more evidence but I cau't because I have to t take care of my children but when evcz passible Ir11 take Pictures. Please .reconsider Your decision. I feel I've been discriminate against. Thank you for looking into this mat'tcr. Sincer. � r -- CITY OF RAV x.110 CUCAMOWGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 13, 19 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Fie William Silva, Deputy ftty Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Civil Enginosr 2JtCT: Vacstion Of Pedestien P:ccess Easement ' Rvsst - 1o�ated between La Paz Court and Aveile s 8t met (Tracts 128; any 1272&) 1. BAiKG DUMD: Seven property okners residing on L-a Poz Court and La ' t4ancha Drive (Exhibit A" h-VE requested the City vucaU1 thcs pedestrian access portion of a 26 foot wide emergency vehicular access, pedestrian access And drainage easement which was dedicated to the City with Tract 12830. The ecsement is located at the north end of the l.a Paz Court cul -de -sac and Aligns with a privately owned lot in the Hamilton Ranch subdivision (Tract 12726) ova.r trhfch an ease went for emergency vehicular access, pedestran access and drain reserved by the owners unto tkmselves, age was On September 12, 1984, the Planning Commission app" � Tentative Tract 12726 which called for a connection from the 4sed tract to the - existing Avalon Street on the west project botirsctar This would provide two meaa,s of y• development; one on Beryl Street rto� h east and one n 0 Carnelian Stree� to the west via the Av on Strreet connection. During the SePU,aber 12, 1984, sleeting, tste planning Caftission reviekec' alternatives to the then proposed connection to Avalon Street. one alternative provided a connection to a future : tract to the south. Another was to provide a connection leading from the trar.t by tIay Of mignonette Street to the north. After reviewing these alternatives the Lommission determined that a permanent means of access was necessary and that the most logical and benet#-cial choice wAS to connect with Avalon Street to the west. On Se,stemoer 20, 1984, an appeal of the Planning COMiSsion's approval was filed by an adjacent property otmer on Avalon Street. Among other things, the appeal was based nn concerns of traffic flow, parking and pedestrian safety on Avalon Street. On November 7, 19844 Staff recos>iseoded to the City Council that the tentative tract be approved and tka appeal denied. however, by U) --/ 0 PLANNING Vacation April 13, Page 2 COMyISSivn STAFF REPORT Of Pedestrian Access Easement Request 1988 memorandum to fire City Council at that same meeting staff re 0rted that after a meeting between tho appellant, developer and staff, all opposition to the project would be eliminated if, among other things, the primary 11ccess point on Avalon Street be ellrainated and only emergency vehicular access be pormitted. Council approved Tentative Tract 12726 proviti'4� that, 1,° a fire lane, with .10 pedestrian access be provided to the existing Avalon Street; and, 2) a separate pedestrian easement be provided which connects the tract to the property to the so +.at#; (now kncwn as La Pax Court). On Decembrr 14, 1984, Platining Commission reviewe6 Tentative Tract 12830 'In addition to an alternative to the needed fire lane and pedestrian sccess easement in q►,,estion. This. alternative relocated the fire Tale in a north /south direction and combined it with the pedestrian access wa0r to La Paz Court. This alternative was approved with the Tentative Tract by the Planning Co+mrission. he Tentative Tract 12723 condition regarding the energancy vehicular access location was revised to the above alternative by City Council on +lanudey 16, 1985. II. ANALYSIS: The applicants have expressed concern with the existence of the pedestrian access way at the north end of La Paz Court. In their request to the City for thn vacation of the access, they reported numerous accounts of vandalise►, from overturned trash cans and other littering to th0t, distructioil of verbal abuse. According to the applicants, the iabove paccon;aIts are attributed to the pedestrian traffic through the access war. The applicants' request also states that the access w "shO"tcut" to schools in the area. Thv applicants stateL� that l�amil ton Ranch has an access way on Beryl Street whiE h has been closed off by a crash gate". rue applicants request a closure of all pedestrian traffic thra►lOh the wccess way in question. Residents of Hamilton Ranch have installed a locking gate across the access war. They stated that a reason for this action was to Comply with a requirement established by the school district involving the busing of school children to Carnelian Elementary School. With the access way left open or not locked, the district would not provide busing for students. If the access had a locking gate or was closed off co,npletely, the district would bus the Children felt~►;; a bus stop located an Beryl Street. 1n. addition, the Hamilton Ranch residents have expressed a desire to �asainta; ;t a pedestrian access to and from Alta Loma High School whi avoid unimproved Beryl Street, ch would Ranc :, the Planning review and approval Ranch in 1984 of Tentative Tract 12726 (Hamilton CO mmission imposed a condition to provide a secondary access to and from the southwest Portion of the -1 11 PLANNING COmmISS%m STAFF REPORT Vacation of Pedestrian Access Easement Request April 13, 198 Page 3 development. This requirement was since modified by City Council to provida a pedestrian access and eeergency access Tray to the south (La Paz Court). She residents of Tract 22830 now feel that the pedestrian aeceas WaYT Should be .eliminated. VII. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomencs that the Commisc' ion hold a pu the General Plan. blic hearing and make a determination a3 to the conformity of the, proposed vacation to I. If the Planning COMMission", Tinds conformity then the vecatfun request will be presented to the City Council by a public hearing. 2. If the Planning Commission finds that the easement should be gastaintd, no further action Brill be taken to City Council unless the applicants wish to aopeal the Planning Commission's decision. h. spectfully submitted, lei 11A-4 W*t- :Fo-v William J. Silva, P.E. Deputy ;ity Engineer WJS:US: jh Attachment -/ 2. �� 0 E�, � .'`r :�- ►�- „ � m rt m � � �� �� � � ° �`�' � �., �, � �; �. � � �: w ���� � �, � ���� w j �' .► . W ., I ,, = t �--- yt i _ . 3 IE ao ,d w � � v :a 0 Brad Bull-2r stated that if the Fire District -has no desire or intention to rse its he did not know %-by it should be upgraded, Comatissioner Tolstoy stated that if it were built to the proper 1 specifications, it flight be used. Com�tissionryr Tolstay moved to deny the vacation and that the Co► ission review it in d months due to the newness of the gate. Commissioner Frick seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following vot.^.: Commissioner Eoxrick stated he would also like to see additional information on try., insuramm on the open situation as opposed to a gated situation, Vice - Chairman Chitim stated that she was concerned about this also. She stated that she was concerned about the school children. She stated that she would lime to see it come back to the ConsissiQn sooner. AYES COMMISSIONERS., TOLMY, EMERICK, BLAKESLEY HOES: COHNISSIONERS: CHITIEA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WRIEL M. ENVIROtaWAL ASSESSMENT AM CORDITIOilAL USE PERMTT a8-07 - RANCHO t - re-ques to establisn n , square c urc n an ex s ng industrial park in the Lida' rial Park strict S,Uiaarea 6i, located at the northeast corner of kven Avenue and Acacia Street a APR: 209- 401 -01. Tae 8rahn,) Assistant Planner, presented the k�'nff report. Vice- Cha#rman Chitiea questioned on how staff` arrived at the two-year time. Tam 6rahn stated that there was no set ttoe, but felt two years was er,ugh time to allow the church to establish itself and let the tenants occupy the co"lex. Ralph PAnson stated that the Commission eo0d bring it back for review at any time. Vice- Chairman Chitiea opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes .I$,. AYES: C(M ISSIONERS: EMERICK, T*OLSTOY, CNITIEA, BLAKESLEY ROES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COFMUSIONERS: MCNIEL -- carried L. VACATION OF PUBLIC ACCESS; EASEMENT BETWEEN LA PAZ COURT AND AVALON Walter Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer, 9 Arssentes! the staff report. Camsaissioner Eterick questioned if there were any arguments for keeping It open. Walter SticknF„' stated that staff did not recommend it open. He stated th• ommend closure or keeping residents to keep it open tohmain received cceae X58 from Hamilton Ranch WY to the high school. Commissioner a Dirty stated thin there' are actually three uses for this access.; Wire District access, which is nVlonger valid from the Fire District Letter, 2) pedestri;ln right-of-way, and S) drainage. He westi6ned how the easement could be abandoned. Walter Stickney Sited that the Pedestrian abandoned and reserve the � portion only could be rg " -ncy vehicular and drainage. COMissioner Tolstoy questioned how it would be closed off. j .vplicants have expressed a desire to close it Walter Stickney stated' that needed to be datermined. th j off to prevent all Pedestrian access. He stated the City Still maintains the drainage Yice- Chairman Chitiea questioned if this was constructed with the ca^ constructed the standards. Fire access, if sa +�y was it not Walter Stickney stated that he did not know why installed or the higher curb to prevent fire vehicles urf block was t Yice - Chairman Chitiea opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minute - s -i2- April 13, 1998 W -� b Lou Parga, resident of 6956 La Paz Court, Rantho Cucamonga, stated that the public easement is a Problem because of a one -way easement providing all the benefits to the residents of Hamilton Ranch ? 'Id the problems for `,he residents of Hf7lgate homes on La Paz Court. He stated people +isiting residents of Hamilton Ranch use La Paz Court for a parking lot. He stated they bought 'their homes on a cul -de -sac for less 1root and car traffic and because of the casement, Ha they, h stated high school kids speed C-) La Paz to e opposite. He pick ave the or drop off friends. He stated kids frofrom mf7, Ranch can use the easement to go to school, but Hillgate kids cannot use it to go the Jr. high school. He stated Hamilton Rancho constructed a gate operated by them to use, and Hillgate is requested the same privilege, He ,tatted their suggestion is to vacate time public easement with a block wall across the easement. David Barnes, resident at 6942 La Paz Court, stated the access .takes 20 feet of his property. He stated he has been informed that he is liable stated he on the Pedestrian and Stateddhhiseinsurancesa agent informed him if claims beinn to come in, he would be put on a high risk. He stated he does not want to continue being responsible for a part of his property he is not allowed to pass through. He stated if the City does not close the accessway, 14e will responsibility. He stated he is cot, not accept any further rned about the children's safety. He stated mailboxes were vandalized an September 26, 1987. He stated much Of the mail was found Inside Hamilton Ranch. He stated he is not saying it is the residents of Hamilton Ranch, but the accessw+ay is an invitation k trouble. He seed mail has not been delivered because of cars parked in front of the mailboxes. He sta Hri3ilton Ranch, there is a minimal ted that within stated that between 10:00 P.M. and Provision A M', for guest parking. s�treeett parking. He -stated that there have been a number of times that they have parked La Paz Court and gone into Hamilton Ranch. He stated that neither coamnity is happy about the easement. He is concerned about residents feel thatl.arel being discriminated a ed ageinstoolHe sit ted the other entrance to Hamilton Ranch is closed off in posted saying it is a private directions. He stated that request is to close off the easement in both directions. Vice - Chairman Chities questioned if the gate is locked from one side with Hamilton Ranch residents having keys and Hillgate not. Mr. Barnes stated that was correct. Robert Navarro, resident of 6950 La Paz Court, stated that he has had aTot of problems in front of his property because Of pedestrian traffic. He stated that La Paz Court is the main street for students grirg to school. He states that after the students pass by, the residents are picking up trash. He stated that they have to make sure their properties are not vandalized and their children are not harassed because of the constant flow Oti traffic. He stated that because there Plansfag Comission Minutes -13` April 13, 1988 L.0 - t'7 rs no parking On the streets of Hamilton Ranch, their visitors park on La °a?::ourt and therefore, sonaetiraes they It seq. s mike it is a one -way street. 62 stated It is very str sfutto live under these circumstances that arise from their walkway. he feels everything is 'Nr Hamilton Ranch and not for illgHeestateedd stated the best solut€an would be close the walkway off completely. Andrew Baluchi, resident of SQQ la Paz Court stated that he is concerndd about the easement on is Mroperty and his liability. He questioned if could get any insurance of the City that if anybody was hurt it would not be his liability beca from the other side. use all of the traffic is coming Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that it is the same as having a sidewalk in front of him house< He stated that normally the City has Only an easement for the sidewalk, and the land owner has fee a City as singed that customaarify them adjoining land owner is not liable for a dangerous condition of the public property or the right -of-May unless they have contributed to a dangerous condition in which case, they are Jointly liable. He stated that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the primary liability source. Andrew Baluchi stated he would like to see the easement closed to prevent any liability on his part. Terry TrAvelsted, resident y of 6827 Chariaea ch iced into this with the (1t and the Fire Departatentt and they saidhit was fine. HO stated that now they are having these problems. He stated that the gate to the City street sidewalk is no more than 20 feet and the rest belongs to the Homeowner's Association of Hamilton Ranch. He stated that they tried their best to provide for tha'dr community and they did what they could. COmdssiOner Blakesley questioned why the one -waty access. It*- Tw We ed stated it was because of the insuranca liability. pe staff' %h - aro a homeowner`s association and if there was an injury, the homeowner's association would be sued, not the City. He stated they are not trying to offend anyone in Hillgate. He stated both are having problems. He stated somoa of the problems has stopped since the? gate went up. CNEissioner Emerick questioned what the view of hOW- Immerls association Ward a total closure of the gate. W. 7ravelsted stated that it would close them off from coming onto a City street and that thA tsids that are going to the high school will be bladed off ' He stated that the homeowner's association is against closing off the access. Pimdflg COmrsnission Minutes - 14- April 13, 1988 w °/ F Camcission r c��ty.s CCERI that doesi not allow ptki g trrma the streets in tee k A.M. Tra�elsted slated yes. betireen the hours of I0;00 p. t4. and 6:00 A.M., so part of the day you can park on t.e street. E 10:00sin th r evening slated that if ithena was a party that lasted past f iO:OQ in the evening then the visitor;; would park on le Pat. f ass Trani onted stated no, that they can get a pass fpm the homeownerts association beard to put on the car to park in the suet. } tared that when the .erring was there wfithout the gate, :'sere were Slot of kids frome Hillgate and other areas u.ting the Swimming root. that it cost than alot of coney to m+iintai�e o :and it can affect Sabred liability insurance. it E I Vice- Chairman Chitiea questioned how Mr. TrIvtlsted felt about the Jr. high students who creed to accost to the north. f N:-. Travelsted stated he could faro for thn, but that as a hamecwner's association, they look at the liabIlity, Debbie I!egras, resident of 6862 Rai►.ms place, Shst in November znd December she hnd spoken with the City Planning Marshall Board and received okay Department and Fire stated than the main reason wash thart Mr out up the gate. She Alta coma School District, told mere timat McMurtry, Superintendent of bussing and that the kindergarteners could wa k re' She stated their Vkat timme �illgats was not to'�,rtly finished and then state; that at acre. Sne stateid that Ntr. McNiWO& s they felt that was access, it quad be unsafe for the kind said that walk Sdown Ber- which has V sidewalks. She stated that fiha Hiligate residents are ra)rried about their ,Jr. high school starddents going up Beryl, She stated that she felt 13 and 34 year Olds would be a little Exit Beryl, responsible stated walking on Beryl than 5 and 6 year old She Stated that there is a lock on the , +ate with a non. duplicate 1. yard only. She stated she was surpriised by the letter the LhalFand Board bec,• °,ise it is oppasifiinn to what she was told in December. stated that she does not understanding the residents of tlillgate of rectiving email because of Hamrilton Rani:h s parked cars because there± 1s parking durie► 'Ltre day in Hamilton if::nch. She stated that they farl the gate should be left as is, Commissioner Tolstoy questioned as to how long the gate has been in place. Mr. ira;velsted stated two weeks. ."Mims COMIssfon Minutes 1 -15+ April 13, 1988 1 ! Pete Peterson, resident of 6880 Charlowm3 years ago, the Planning Commission spent aloe of t 1esearceh time time if this community needed two primary entmces either pedestrian or vehicular. He stated that it was determined that furls sues the best Place for one. He states+ that they we- that he too was surprised by the re yepar�nt keep $tAt� th stated turf bl ock needed to be put in for fire vehicles, he would not be opposed to that to rafntain the easement. homeowner's of HfiTgai;u should have bee, notified He stated . time of the at the purchase by Citation Builders that this ited easement existad. He sfis that he had written letters to the easement stating his v,Vws; He stated Gee would like iv keep his kindergartener on the bus. David Barneu stated that "s wife had talked with the today and asked therm abot . tl ds access. .t etementa ry school that if there was a gate, t'. 2n th stattd that they had sand students. He stated that theyy+ had le ked the uMi es elementary going the access an the Hamilton Ranch side going down to Beryl to the High the High nSchorand the ,$ through a rl°!m �;1�1d� Carnelian to Andrew Baluchi questioned that if this easement maintained Open, was it possibld for his name be taken off the property. Ralph Hanson stated tnat would involve deeding that property, to the City and it would be yap to the City to accept that deed. He stated it was possible, but cannot coeasit that the City Council would accept it. Yfee- Chairmn Chitiea closed the public hearing. CosNissioner Eimerick stated the Commission assuawes everytody knew there was an casement when they purchased the property even though they did not know the law imposes to look at their title report. He stated that it bothers hiss that the easement is being used above and beyond the Purposes I was want for, ie., People harking to the south and going f alleviate this situation Ranch. He if i wtass op n$ fklstatedgthfl atubothers him th,2t it does not wo&., both ways. WO- Chairman Chitiea �Pestioned if therti a.,:) Other streets or locations in Hamilton Ftencho. any other gates on ark, halter Stickney stated no, but there is a crash gate that i fence, s really a CoWssioner Tolsto y+ questioned if the crash gate has access to Ber9r7, Halter 5tickn* stated yes. Vice- ChtisTman Chdtiea stated that there was thEn open unobstructed Ames to their private streets. Planing Commission Minutes ilprfl 13, 1988 W -Z° Baiter Stickney stated that there was from the north on Migonette, Crataissioner Slakesley stated that he was confused about the open access from the north, but their liability Zays they have a problem having access to the south. He stated that he has an emotional reaction to their walk o o, their stree ties that somehow the walk community at large is not worthy to r, ts. He stated that he did see anything there that would support vandalism. He stated that h mwdlie t ea the emergency access upgraded so that it is usable and maintained. Ke stated that he feels the pedestrian acc,,ss is unacceptable as it is. Me stated that he feels it should either be closed off or opened up so that it works both wags. He stated that ha is uncomfortable having the CoMission put in the middle of a neighbo;itood dispute. He stated that he is a little disappointed that the Comnoission ts. Commaissioner Tolstoy agrees with Commissioner Slakesi ' the Planning Camaiusion has always upheld pedestrians bike s and horse traffic. He Stated that they have talked about the nice feeling that they ware trying to have in the City of ems asaryy spots in the City as Possible. He stag Pedestrian wratld not access ike to see .any pedestrian flow cut off. He stated tr 3t there was a pro6�laat and the Hamilton Ranch resNents addressed that problem the best the ,could he the construction of at gate. He staW that the ate has E :d by for a couple of creeks. He stated ht xandered what !would i gyve hap If the gate had been installed in the beginning. He stated that he wished the Commission could dalag a decision tam see if the gate would alleviate any of the problems 'if eith" AC= munity. Vice - Chairman Chitiea stated she was cn the Com,aission when the original decision was made in regards to the access to the community, where i�'. might be. etc. She stated it has always been the poadtion of the CMIssiV to provide for access throughout the communities, connecting neighborhoods together. She stated access from a pedestrian and zafetyr di igetibuilltt to the necessary Standards because fire safe was taajor concern. She stated that having :; gatt� cce n,ty closed. in one location and not in others does nvt and rap. Site stated th t 0.yvt part of the problem coats fros t.4e Alta Fowl School District and tiro :puling of bussing. She stated that a one -Nay+ access without reciprocal use is realty unacceptable. She stated sh,a would support leaving the eme.,gency WPing• Brad Buller stated that the only issue before the Comission tonight is the vacation. He stated th;tt the '- � fssian can take action on the ism or simply retain the easement as it exists now but reevaluate it agaie with 3 to months. This, 'would give the Commission anal staff more evidence as to how the new gate is working. CMissioner Blakesiev questioned if there was any way to upgrade the amKIMy access. PION" Commission Minutes 'YT April 13s 19$8 W 21 . CrIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMORANILTINq DATE: February 22, 1958 TO: File FROM: William J. Silva; Qe ut City q ^�' p Y nQl ►7s'r .� SUBJECT: 'La Paz Court � P•rwarty Ownsrs rerquest io&zbandoned Easement: Sur- of r*� qty Viers Meeting Pedestrian At 6;00 p.m. on ,aday, Feb ?uary 22, 14138. City Engineering Staff menisers Engineer Silva, Deputy City Cngineer and Wait Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer canduc�ad an inforr2l Meting with crners of rroperty on La. Paz eoe!rt. The Purpose of the r>---�ting was to provide P forum Far discussion Of (i) the Process for ;boor :sing the pede3tfan access easement at the north moan of La e Court, {�4 the Issues and concerns of the property owners. and (3j the Reca�endatfons of the home miners. This memo Meeting. The description o General Plan between the subdivision sur�ma►ites the discussions and disc4'ssion regarding the abendoraenteProceduresdinclud #d,a Of renity by the Planning Caeaission for rrinsistericy with the relatir� to vacating and abandoning tram pedestrian acess f "llgate subdivision (`a Paz Court) and the Hamilton Ranch tb the nWtN. The OM City Council het.Ping process wh' l would follow the Planning discussion hearing was described inciLaing the oPe! haarin discussion at Council level, and ;� final decision of g tpr�ocess, Council. Staff also explained that (advanced notice will be provided ito all property owners in the vt-+-; ty of the hearings before the Planning Co^+mfssfon a��d the City Irian l easement s f also advised the property Owners that if t" Planning Corx+fssyon does not to the City Council. Staff agree with the proposed abandorfeent, an appeal would have to be processed identified the March 23, 1488 Planning rommarissioding n these AGsed1 9s entative sc adule for presentation of a report me following briefly surssnarires the issues and comments made ty the property owners: I. Is Mfrs easement access. Hari 1 ton easement. a 10,1e-way street "? Only thQ portion of public within the Hillside subdivision is open to public North of tract boundary the land is armed by the Ranch Homeowners Association and is rent i __ w _Z2- LA PAZ COURT FEBRUARY 22, 1988 PAGE 2 2. Emergency vehicle acce,'? A gate is via :'witted. would have to be on the private pro +arty portion Tha e gate _of the access easanant and could be Opened by Fire District vehicles o amergeticy. 3. Does .HM,vltLOn Hunch own the Public easement? (may, say they bought it-) 'Ni, the public easemen subdivision is a City eas^oents t on the Hillside 4. Numbers ae pe2ple affected. Concern that Hasilton' Rancig Property srrrters have free 4ccas5 to La Paz Court whereas ,Property Owners to the south do not have the son 3. Parking Hamilton Ranch his none, no over- harking. Complaint that visters *,,:o t�* Hamilton Rana" ubdivisia use La Paz Court and *fie struea;:t to the south for parking. s. Concern over vandalism. (Ho respect for r i pr*;Vrty.) Reports of burned mail from boxes, traah� &td litter deposited in the street area, and reports of thefts. Property awnars indicated that they could prow #.de copies of police reports regarding ; of these incidents. 7. The liability issue of pedestrians using the public easement as it relates Property. to thu owrners Of t16- adjacent D. Could the Hamilton Ranch Property Gmer rx request abandonmentg Yes, they could apply for and request the abandd "t Proceedings. t SWA public hearings and notice to adjacent ,property owner -. mould be followed. 9. If the ea OWMt is Abindwned who cloves it off? fyiha does the erork" This was identified try L,ty staff as an item which c Juld r(40 re expenditurc Of' budget funds and acco"Ifsie t of work by the Cit,Y4Council Approval) LIN { LA PAZ COURT FEBRUARY 22, JJW E PAGE 3' Nab i I I The follc,wing recommenratioras were + d by the property owners Pr4sente relative to the closure of this pedestrian easement. 1. Close it off. i 2* open th* gate from Hamilton Ranth to Beryl Avenue. ` 3. Use the school bus stop on 8sryl Avenue instead tf E allowing schoal children to use the pedestrian access tr a Paz Court. t Other discussion at the Ming included the naed to maintain a drainage a G 6ASSNORt through the :rat of existing Pedestrian eas ts. The e re�rty ownership of ttr! land across which the eisamene lies is t public easement ;. and not a dedicated right -of wSy. owners 7herefara, the cu%sioni: property PetY tans and own the aasaebtnt Praparty. Otssuzsian about the I abandonment procedures included a qutstign rf the coat of tht Proceedings the and the use of the processing fee t» for p Waratipn Of various reports and publicatl(w and pr"gv atl o Of various notices and information for hearings. E WJs.dla cc; Russell N. Maguire Walt Stickney Otto Kroutil. Scott Murphy Shy DOCember 7, 1987 Citation 8uiidcrs 17731 Irvine Baulevprd, Suite 201 Tustin, California 9aBC RE: Hiligi;to Dwv�,pment As residence of La Par Court � am extromaly concart,ed with ; situation in aldessc. this so called "; s all Paid ydditiong m %V dw ams. As to live on o atdesac, not a main tl' o�;ghfgm for evil stated in the saw International O onI Dictionary of the Englitte La.'e�uaIIa �agnell a culdasac is; q paw rybody is3 however, the foot traffic continues in both It directions ��� ,al e�nly �° Funky, onl only drive into it era y,• Nona of us ware informed about this firs access the community behind us "gmilton way thsi cone our de the part of Citatic.,e Builders. Rte' " fuel �t this W a rinds wit necessary to take v �` Unless thiss situetiore is rasohred in groat misntPrmgtion or to all that nniu4 per action. Not only is this firs •^sss short oec►� I.r, m,Y became sell. • but it will greatly affect the value w4y a eonzgnt sxuca of discomfort r Prof W" when um decide to As you can no by the attached mamp there have been numerous probVrme as a fire access way. na,ii of this Additional money was Paid f :t a cull Ind the cuidasac, but masrly a dead and stmat Wth excftl� ootm�!° � We do not reside on a Your immediate aMntion with Ord to this matter %mll be greatly ePPrRCiatad. ol L.e'V -ice -'! b �- :r. � c'4i. .CE-tJ �xNir3lj' 'i�� Decem+b" 7, 1987 The following is a statement fdoro tt* residence of the Hlllgats Housing DOWeloPment. The thrust of this comolaint pertains to the joining of this derwlaprrYent with L'+e PRIVATE community of Hamilton Ranch via the La Paz Cou!3 culsiesec. This joining of the two communities by a fire otem way it causing r�urneroua problems with the re3= zee of Hitlgate. The following � an examrle of whet has oaaJmd ea a result of the I natant Wt traffic using thr^ firs acom way. — Nlunttraus W9 of vandalism Taxi fs overturned onto street: front P"mAW, and into back yards —Older residn" varba.ty abused whM coafrunting the individuals causing the vandalism —P8W wr+PPert left behind on a mWiar basis —Small children threatened a :d asked so give up tb.,Ir soya —Rcaks hurled at mail boxes and parked vehicles -,Mali tuxes vandalised and mail stolen (POIi:e report filed) — Motorcycle type vehicle riding on Sidewalks to get %a firs access way —Dogs, unlee- -eel, coming into the community and relieving themselvte ors Private propertl7. our lawns thv front —Parking t %%,ns f h !a Paz Court to gems parties at Usmilten Ranch, and than erring ties front lawns of the residence «) U"Nita (Prune report filed) NOTE: Hamilton Ranch hm no fad,'' '%Q for ov rr night isa:iting for tenants or guests. —At least two tansnts have been ierla.ey abUW, by residence of Hamilton Nanch when taking a simple walk through their PRIVATE t amr nunity 1,,Get the Hail our `j —As., exult of the driveway for tha fire aces way kids find both ands of the fine acct way a great fits= to jump with `mir billet and sktttboards We feel that the fire access way Is ft cause of a tramardous amourt of Probiams invoving both communities. .oils that a m=jorir{ of the fact traffic comes from H:rdilt,M Ranch through Hillgate, a s., ;r, �Jt to schools. WIN cm ,egvasting a closures of this firs acem way in a r, that wOuic � :x °:�ur:V any and ell foot traffic. annar Hamilton =7;.z-1ch %may have another access way lot =ted off of 6ery7 S� At, ho #r. oad er, r has bean c fsd oft by a cfath gate. Since Hamilton P =ch is a PRIVO�TE community do not w sh ether communities into their community, this %=Id by t much netw; fire ac�� y way tha.� the one currently eannecting t;je two commu!%itles. Hopafr ;y this war ld Salves a ma'oritY of the problems mantior �d in this memo. Your assistance in ;l"" matter is greatly �preciited, -716