HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/11/09 - Agenda Packet------------------
0701-02 0 11-9-88 PR.0 Agenda of 3
p
OF
t
RAU-10 CCMOMA
O r y`Nv OMM pV
� Z AG IA
Ci A
1977
WEDNESDAY November 9, 1988 7e00 P.M.
IJONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
91401 BASE LINE
RANCHO CUCAMO1iGA, CALIFORNIA
L fledge of Allegiance
IL Roll Cali
Commissioner Blakesley Commissionex Emerick
Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel
Commissioner Tolstoy
IiL Announcements
IV. ApprowA of Miautes
October 12,1988
October 28,1988
Adjouned Meeting of Octaber 20, 1980
V. Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please
wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission j
by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be
limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project.
I
A. VARIANCE 88 -24 - R k S INVESTMENT GROUP - A request
to allow iocal equestrian trails to be located in the front of
the lots within Vesting Tentative Tract 13851 on 38.87 acres
in the: the Very* Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling
unitsr "acre) located north.of Wilson, east of Canistel Avenue
and west of the Door Creek Channel - APN: 201- 121 -18 and
21.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN`1`• :1 ND CONDITIONAL-USE
E MIT U-43 - AI,MFTEAL - Vie--quest-to o establish a
moving and storage _business in a leased spaed of -1,000
square, feet within sin einsting multi - tenant industirlai park an
3.8 acres in the GenBi'AI industrial District (Sabarea • 4)
located at 5734 s -- 9740 oixth Street APN, 209- 211-32 and
3 W.
j
a
C.
:i' NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONIC -IONAL USE
PERMIT 88 -35 - HUGHES INVF,STME14TS - The'development
of a conceptual, Master Plan for 10 acre neighborhood
shopping center, specific approval of a 2.9 acre
Phase I consisting of two retail shop builditr s of 13,024
square feet and a service station of 2,187 square feet.on land
zoned "Village Commercial Center" located at tl,te, r%wcst
corner of Base Line and Victoria Park Lane - APh, ;:17 -111 -
28, 34,, 4id 35.
D.
ENVIRONMEFT2A7, ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP 11838 - FIt Pk.H.ES IR;VESTMSNTS - A subdivision of 2.9
acres of land into two :paree's in the Victoria Planned
Community, located on the ttorthwest corner of Base Line and
Victoria Park Lade - APN: 227-111-28, 34 and 35.
i E.
I NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A,ND TENTATIVE TRACT
13812 - PULSAR - A residential subdivision of 154 single
family lots zn 71,33 acres of land in the Very Low Residential
District (1-2 dwelling [snits per acre) of the Etiwar4a Specific
Plan and the f .5w Residential General Plan Des'' ;nation (2-4
dwelling units per .ore), located west of Etiwanda Avenue,
between Summit and Highland Avenues - APR- 225 - 161 -35,
36, 37, 38, 49, .53, 55, 61 and 225- 171 -01. 09, 10, 17�
(Referr,*d from City Council October 5, 1D88,)
F.
EN'/iRONMEN''TAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88-26 -
F(TLSA�R - A rewiest to reduce 'the mUdmum let depth from
100 fet�t to 94 &et and 95 feet for two lots in conjunction
'
with a residential subdivision of 154 single famuy lots on
71.33 Ceres of land located ;vest of Etiwanda Avenue,
between Summit and Highland Avenues - A,P11: 225-161-55,
3e, 37, .35, 49, 531 55, 61 and 225- 171 -01, 09, 10, 17.
(Refer -ed from C'itt, Council October 5, 1988.)
G.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
COLE AMENDMENT 88 -07 - CITY OF WAANvHO
CUC•AMONGA - An amendment to Title 11, Chapter 17,04ofof
the Sncho Cucamonga Municipal Code permitting the use of
on•- street parking for model home sales offices meeting
certain criteria. (Continued from October 26, 1988,)
VL New Business
H.
MODMICATION' TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -01 - SAN i
ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL - The develhpment of a
medical center consisting of s 39,938 square foot ambulatory
health care facility and 82,932 square feet of medical offices
on 10 acres of land `in the Mixed: Use (MHO) District within
the Terra Vista PL dined Community, located at the southeast
cl Mer of MMon e,,:fenue a5td Church Street w• APN; 227-
151 -13 and 14.
VII. Collned Referrals
L SAPPHIRE TRAM
1 IIL Die -. -toe's Reports
J. BIKE TRAIL ON VICTORIA AVENUE
I 1K. Commisdon &'!*ness
74 Publie Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to address the
f Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do; not
already appear on this agenda.
XL Adjournment
The PIanning Commission has adopted Administrstve Regulations
Mat set an 11 pm. adjournment time. If items go beyord that
time, they shall be heard only with the con3ent of the Commission.
°r
VICINITY"' MAP.
�
r`�
;
pppk
i
'1
lfJ.IdA
�
�.
tMYfen
. s
COLLEM 4, i .�.
CHIFFiY ��• -
_
20 ,
J
s.�..,
� G'i N
�i
19th
3a
9Y
�¢
yAl.
�>BiBC Pb�M im!•. '
mumv
,AI`■
�
y
B—LY. H
W
YAM
'YMANNNpt
X
LION
PAX
CITY
HALL
■
N
a
�ye
■
A6—
a • �
e
■
t
A
• a`
CUCANOHOA•GUASTi COU)A REGIONAL PAIIX
- OHtARM INT£AXAf1GXaC A/XPDXP
.A
pAll II ®i RANCHO OX.
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 9, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cindy N eris, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT:
VArANCE 88 -24 - R & S INVESTMENT GROUP - A reques
allow oca eques r an trails o + i-oca ed in hE iI--
of the lots within Vesting Tentat ve Tract 13851 on 38.87
acres in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2
dwelling unit3 per acre) located north of Wilson,, east of
Canistei Avenue and west of the Deer Creek Channel -
APN: 201- 121 -18 and 21.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of a Variance to allow local
eues— an tralls to be developed as front- lccded parkway
tra%t .
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
r - FTa-Go--nti�-dT -
South
- Proposed single family; Low Density Residential (2 -4
dwelling units per acre)
East - Flood Control
West - Existing and proposed single family; Very l.ow
Residential Density (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
C. General Plan Designations:
Project Site — very LOW Residential Density (less than 2
dwelling units per acre)
North - Flood Control
South - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre)
East - Flood Control
West - Very Low Residential Density (less than 2 dwelling
units per acre)
0. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant except; for scrub and
chaparral ve—ge-tation and has an approximate slope of 8% from
north to south. The site, is bordered to i,he west by the
existing and proposed Deer Creek Development, to the north and
east by the proposed Hillside and Deer Creek Flood Control
Channels and to the south by Wilson Avenue.
ITEM A
PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT
VA 88 -24 - R & S Investment Group
November 9, 1988
Page 2
S
II. ANALYSIS•
A. General: The proposed Vesting Tentative Tract ',%p 1,851, for
15T"7ois, was approved by the Piann.ng Commission on October 12,
1988 subject to approval of a Variance to allow front - loaded
local equestrian trail easements.
The applicant is proposing to locate 15 foot local equestrian
trail easements in the front of the lots to be developed as
landscaped greenway trails Consistent with those in the
existing Deer Creek development.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In reviewing the Variance request, the
Planning Commission may wish to consider the following facts which
support the mandatory findings:
1. The site is unique in that it is the last remaining, land
adjoining the Deer Creek development and is landlocked by
Hillside /Deer Creek Channel. Vesting Tentative Map 13851 forms
a logical geographic exte,esion of the street and trail system
of the Deer Creek deve%pment. It is not expected that this
system will be extender: beyond the Hillside /Deer Creek Channel.
2. Providing front- loaded local feeder parkway trails will allow a
continuation of the existing Deer Creek trail system and
streetscape character.
3. The continuation of a front-ioaded trail system should not
present a safety hazard as:
(a) Residents in the area are used to and are aware that
riders may be crossing the driveways.
(b) Vesting Tentative Tract 13851 has been conditioned to
require that all driveways be a maximum two car width
wherever possible.
(c) A texturized, non -skid surface may be used in driveways
where they cross trails.
4. The minimum area necessary to provide for a 12 foot parkway and
15 foot equestrian trail easement is 27 feet which can be
accommodated in all front and side yard situations. The
minimum front and corner side yard: setbacks provided are 37
feet and 32 feet respectively while the average setbacks
provided are 48.8 feet and 39.6 feet.
PLANNING CCAATSSION STAFF REPORT
VA 88 -24 - R & 5 Investment Group
November 9, 1988
Page S
I'V' CO"RESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily --R-eepport
newspaper as a Public Hearing, the property posted, and rintices
sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site.
V. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commisriion
Conauct. a public hearing to consider all input and elements of :the
project. After receiving all Infarmation, if the Planning
COMission can support the findings outlined in tl,e staff report,
staff recommends approval of this Variance through adoption of the
attached Resolution.
Re fully t ,
8 d8 e
Cit (anne
88 :CN:vc
Attachments: Applicant letter
Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit 484 - Trail Location Map
Exhibit "V - Equestrian Overlay Map
Exhibit "D" - Draft of Planning Cnsamission Minutes for
October 12, IM
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
ATTACHMENT TO APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 138,51
(REVISED)
This variance application seeks to enable the development of
Vesting Tentative Tvact•No. 13851 with equestrian trails located
and improved in the same manner as the equestrian trails in the
adjacent Deer Creek subdivisions.
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 13851 is the last undeveloped land
remaining in the geographic area bounded on the west by Haven
Avenue, on the north by Hillside Channel, on the east by Deer
Creek Channel, and on the south by Nilson Avenue. This area
contains approximately 335 acres, of which the subject property
occupies alsout 39 acres -- less
remaining than 12% of the total. 'the
DeerCreek88enjoys aheSystemyofeequestrianetrailshlocatedeatathe
fronts of the resid'ntial lots and improved with ground cover,
trees, and painted wood fences. This system was designed and
approved .before the adoption of the nor- prevailing development
standards for such trails, which require that local trails be
located at the backs of the lots and that all trails be improved
with decomposed granite surfacing and three -rail PVC.fences.
The Trails Committee has recommended the trails in Vesting
Tentative Tract No. 23851 be located and improved according to
current criteria. This recommendation, if implemented, would
deprive the eventual residents of the tract of a significant
Property right enjoyed by all O)ahnr properties within this
geographic area ° the right of privacy within the rear yards --
by locating the local, trails at the backs of the lt,ts.
Implemezitation of this recommendation would also deprive at
least 29 existing Deer Creek properties of rear yard privacy -
a right, already enjoyed by those 19 properties as well as by all
other properties in the Deer Creek development. Moreover, by
improving the trails to current standards, the residents of aU
;Properties within the area -- the 374 Deer Creek properties as
well as the 61, lots in tIae subject tract -
the physical and visual continuity that �vQu uld dbresultjifdthe
subject property -- the last 12% of the entire area -- could be
developed according to the unique standards already in place on
the other 88% of the area.
Approval of thie variance will have no adverse effects on the
General Plan, nor w3.11 the xaealth, safety, and well being of the
residents be impaired. Finally, because of the dominant
P"Ysical boundaries of the area and the fronc -oi -lot system
already in place, unique circumstances do exist here which are
not found elsewhere in they community -- hence approval of this
variance should not create a precedent for changes in rails in
other parts of the City. a ,
,,.Jv CC
CRf Or;.itv�» Giv C•aN rear
Ask
COT 3 (988
E
\µJ
` ,z
ANCHo r'
ITEM:
ZXHIBITL SCALE!
99;hIi
amp\
§kj
E
' Ir
§E� !
� <
� ■
(a
C I� �
TRANCIRO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIV'BION P-
»�)
o
. 2
\: 2
wj
f■
a
` 9 «
! f $ K
\ g \m
■ §
. w
@
CA
E
q
W6HO CUCAMONGA Tma..
■ S f
SEE SHEET- NO 4
. i i ,a ``�~ � \fie C� •` f \ � '. � � � i 1 1
I + �
i >
i• + ` `.< • .xo iii!
I�
SKET N, ,
Y
NORTlib
DIVIS1011i ► ,�
11
CITY OF Normilb
ANCH ► CUCA N(�,� ITEM
ION 7�
���►sv l��G icl s; y ,,
E
Op
Almon m
Ta 9TA •1
E1 SCALE:
The applica questioned if he had to pay full fees er for future
undergroundin of utilities on the project side of Hellman " nue.
Barrye Hanson,�enlcr Civil Engineer, clarified that would and that the
City Council had recently backed that practice. ,
Vice- Chairman Chit a indicated the applicant had t right to appeal the fees
to City Zouncil.
Hearing no further to imony, the public hear` R was closed.
Vice - Chairman Chitiea i icated the prof had undergone considerable desi i
changes to overcome the t hnical probl in the original desi97. g
Commissioner Blakesley sta' d he f it was a nice project and the would
support it.
Commissioner Emerick pointed that the decrease irl density fro,;i g to 4
would be better for the neig rh d.
Motion: Moved by B1ak 'a'iey, sec ded by Emerick to adopt Resolution
approving Environmental ssessment a Tentative 'Traci 14063. .ion carried
by the following vote,
AYES: COMMIS NERS: BLAKESLEY;, TTiEA, EMERICK
NOES: CO SIGNERS: NONE
ABSENT: K41SSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY - carried
C. ENVIRONMENTAL '$AUT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13851 - R & S
�` +C but Asa en la su -vjs on an eslgn revlaw o C
sing a ami ,y tot, on 33.92 acmes of land in the Very Low Density
Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located east
Of existing Tract 95CZ-1s west of Deer Creek Channel and north of Wilson_
Avenue - APH: 201 - 121 -13 and 21.
Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Emerick asked if Community trails were currently located in front
of lots in the current Deer Creak tract.
Dan CrIeman, Senior Planner, confirmed that trey were, and that a variance
would be needed to allow trails on this tract to be located in the front of
lots.
Commissioner Emerick asked if there was a difference in lot size between, Ae
proposed development and Deer Creek.
Planning Commission Minutes _g_
October 12, 198E
Y7/24P, 70
Ms. Norris indicated that the 10ts were similar in sze to Deer Creek.
Vice- Chairman Chitiea opened the public hearing.
Philip Nourafchan, Genr-ral PartnAr of N b S Investment Group, indicated the
only itm of concern aas the trails_ He stated this parcel was the only
property available between Haven and Deer Creek Channel. They had been asked
by surrounding homeowtrars and the City to keep the development in confolmnce
with Deer meek.. They had desi pned the trails to be in front of the houses
and cou'a .ot understand why stai'f was requiring them to be moved to the back
on V' 'mall tract. He stated that during a neigbbonccod meeting,
surrou „uing homeowners had opposed placing the trails fi,' back because of lack
Of visibility and the increased aikelihooc. of dumping on the trails. He
stated that staff had voiced concern with front- loaded trails because horses
have to cross over concrete, and they were willing to make the driveways as
narror. as possible so horses would not have to rroas much concrete.
Conviissioner Emerick asked if there was enough room in front of the lots to
provide for 10 foot trails.
Mr. Nourafchan responder that there was and they had designed Smaller houses
for the smaller lots.
Bruce Wilcox , Hillside Road, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he had seen - trails in
back of homes and they become dumping grounds. He rettera4ed that neighbors
would like to see continuity with Deer Greek and have the trails in front,
Mr. Melcher requested clarification that Tract Map Condition #8 would be
waived if the City Cou —mil did trot approve reimbursement from systams
development fees.
Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was dosed.
Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, suggested adding a statement to
Conditer, #S to waive the condition if reimbursement was not approved.
Vice- Chaiman Chitiea asked if the City Council did not agree to
reimbursement, how the bridge would be Constructed.
Mr. Hanson responded that a condition could be placed on a future project or
the bridge could be completed as a City project.
Commissioner Emerick st»dted that the Condition calied for one structure,
however the Traits ComtA ttee had requested two separate bridges.
Russ Maguire, City Engineer, respG-ded that the crossing would probably'ue a
box culvert rather than a bridge, and they would maintain the same separation
across the culvert as is on the street. He requested that thO Commission
soesify how much separation was needed.
Vice- Chairman Chitiea pointed out that flexibility would he good.
Planning Comfaission Minutes -9- October 12, 1988
Commissioner Slakesley pointed out that if the trait was placed in back cf the
lots, Current homeowners to the west_ would have trails both front and back.
He stated he would support having the trails in front in order to raainta %n
consistency.
Comissloner Em+erick felt that on smaller tots having the trails in front adds
aesthetically without detracting from the back,
Vice- Chalr-aan Chitiea felt the same aesthetic look could be achieved by adding
adOitionai landscaping to the front of the lots, She supported the Trails
Coiaeittee s desire to have the trails in back because of the frequency of
crossing driveways and the desire to have a rear yard service area for horse
trailers and feed deliveries. She further asked how a variance requesting
front - loaded trails should be handled.
fir. Coleman suggested adding a standard condition that approval of the. tract
etas granted subject to the approval of a variance to allow front-loaded
trails.
Commissioner Biakgsley Med tha idea because it would allow the Commission
another chance to look xr, the plans.
Vice - Chairmen Chitfea stated she would like the project conditioned to provide
for rear loa�acl trails and landscaping in the ?runt to be maintained by 3
hom°nwnert' association if the variance was not approved,
Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, responded that the tract map cannot be
approved without the variance.
Commissioner Blakerley asked about the trees. He stated he would be in favor
of maintaining consistency with the trees currently in deer Creek,
Motion: Movers by Blakesley, secoi0ed by Emerick, to adopt the Rezolution to
approve Vesting tentative Tract 0851 with the following modifications:
k approval shall not be considered final lentil an application for a variance fo,
front- loaded trails has been acted upon by the Planning Co=issio:,, that tree
plantings be consistent with the Deer Creek tract, and the wavier of the
condition to constrict the Wilson Avenue crossing of Fleur Greek it
reimbursement was reined by City Council, Motion carried by the following.
vote:
BYES COIMMISSIOH£RS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT, COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, TOLSTOY - carried
Planning Commission Minutes -10. October 12, 1888
�i
r-
11
0
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 88 -24 A REQUEST
TO ALLOW LOCAL - FEEDER TRAILS TO BE LOCATED IN THE FRONT
OF LOTS WITHIN VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13851 LOCATED
NORTH OF WILSON, EAST OF CANISTEL AVENUE, AND WEST OF THE
DEER CREEK CHANNEL IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 201- 121 -18
AND 21.
A. Recitals.
(1) Vesting Tentative Tract 13851, for 61 lots, was approved by the
Planning Commission on October 12, 1988 subject to approval of a Variance to
allow front - loaded local equestrian trail easements.
(ii) R & S Investment Group has filed an application for the
Issuance of the Variance No. 88 -24 as described in the title of, this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub e A Variance request is
,referred to as "the application ".
(M) On Rover: Qw 9, 1988, the Planning Comission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
occurred. (iv) All legal prereouisites to the adoption of this Resolution havo
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, eatermined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamronga as follows
set forthlin This Commission
Vitals, Part A hereby his Resolutionnare that a.1 true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing on November 9, 1988, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application appiies to property located north of
Wilson Avenue, east of Canistel Avenue, and west of Deer Creek Channel; and
(b). Vesting Tentative Map 13851 fortes a logical ge- graphic
extension of the street and trail system within_ the existing deer Creek
Develon. ent to the i{illside /Deer Creek Channels; and
PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VA 88 -24 - R & S Investment Group
November 9, 1988
Page 2
(c) ho Dyer Creek Development and Vesting Tentative Tract
13851 occupies apprcximattty 335 „_res of land which is bounded by Haven
Avenue to the west, Hillside Channel to the north and Deer Creek Channel to
the east. Vesting Tentative Tract 13851 encompasses approximately 39 acres;
and
(d) Residents of all properties in the area, the 374 Deer
Creek properties and the 61 lots within the subject tract, will be able to
enjoy the physical and visual continuity of the existing trail system; and
(e) The front loaded trail system within the Deer Creek
Development was originally approved prior to the adoption of the current trail
standards; any
(f) The provision of front loaded local feeder trails will not
presant a safety hazard as measures such as narrowing driveway widths and
providing a non -skid surface will be implemented; and
(g) There is adequate area available in both the front and
corner side yards to accommodate the 12 foot parkway and 15 foo4 local
equestrian trail easements, The minimum setback provided in the front and
corner sideyards are 37 feet and 32 feet, as measured from curb face,
respectively.
i
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during thew above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would result
in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the
Advelopment Code.
(b) That there are exceptional nr extraordinary
circumstances or conditions appijrable to the
property involved or to the intende use of the
property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
(c) that strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
i
owners of other properties in the same district.
That the granting of the Variance will not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
f with the limitations on other properties classified
in the same district.
I '
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VA 88 -24 - R & S Investment Group
November 9, 1988
Page 3.
(e) That the granting of the Variance will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially in7w.ious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approved the applcatior'i subject to
the conditions set forth below.
1) That a non -skid texturized paving surface shall be provided
where driveways cross any egi:estrian trail,
2) All pertinent conditions of approval for Vesting Tentative
Tract No. 13851, as .container•: in Resolution No. 88 -208,
shall apply.
5. The Secretary, to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
if this kesolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad u er, Secretary
I, Brad Culler, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, :passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th :lay 4f %vember, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS.
NOES:. COMiMiISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY 01F RANCHO CUCAMO.NGA
STAFF REPORT AMA
DATE: November 9, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -43
- request to es s. a moving an s oorage
bus in n a leased space of 10,000 square feet in an
existing multi tenant industrial park on 3.8 acres in the
General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at 9734
and 9740 6th Street. APR: 209- 211 -r32 and 33.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested. Approval or a non- construction Conditional
Use Fermi an . ssuance of a klegattve Declaration for a moving
and storage business.
B. Su�rroy.idin Land Use and Zoning:
oR -77 =r - enan_ Indust r ai, General Industrial
South - Multi- Tenant industrial, General Industrial
East - Multi- Tenant Industrial, General Industrial
West - Single Family Residential, Cow (2 -4 dwelling units
per acre)
C. General Plan Designations:
ro ec i�-- enera neustriai
North - General Industrial
South - General Industrial
East - General Industrial
West - Low Density ' Residential (2 -4 dwelling inits per acre)
D. Site Characteristics!` The proposed use is located within an
existing - enan 'Industri'al Park.
ITEM 8
PLANNING comis5ION STAFF REPORT
CUP 88-43 < OLMSTEAD
November 9, 1088
Page 2
E. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Sgt!are Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage —Ratio Required Provided
ided
Ardco Inc. 10,000 1/500 20 20
Atomic Energy
of Canada 4,000 I /Soo 8 8
Advanced Floor Co. 4,400 1ISoo 8 g
Vacant 5,,000 1/500 16 16
* Proposed moving
and storage lo,G00 1 /1,000 10 10
Total IT ZY
F. A licable ReReguiations: The Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea
caws- me�Lq4 wi'ioesesale storage and distribution, s0ject to
the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by We planning
Comission.
11. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed movj% and storage business will
pr nar y specialize in home moves. The warehous;: will be used
for storage of the customer household goods. the busirQss will
have five 26 foot bobtail truckfi which will be dispatched from
the warehouse location. Bustaess hours will be 3 A.M. to a
P.M. Monday through Saturday and closed on Sundays..
B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this type of
use w thin an industrial setting are compatibility with
surrounding business and parking availability. '?here are a
variety of uses within this center and compatibility problems
are not expected.
Based upon the proposed square footage of 10,000, the peiposed
moving and storage business will require 10 parking sraces for
employees (1 space per 1,000 square feet). Therefr.�-e, current
on -site parking of ten spaces is adequate to acs modate this
use. however, there are also five 26 foot trucks associated
with the business, whereat, there are only four truck parking
spaces. Further, there is only 63 feet between the two
buildings, which will not adequately accomkidate the truck
parking (see Exhibit "D ")). The trucks will obstruct the
required two -way circulation in this drive aisle.
2
QM
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF i.EPORT
CUP 88 -43 OLMSTEAD
November 9, 2988
Page 3
The Foothill Fire Protection District has reviewed this
application and would require sprinkler plans to be reviewed
prior to occupancy.
C. Environmental Ass
essmeat: Upon review of Part 1 of the Initial
u an comp a on or art 2 of the Environmental Checklist,
staff has fc"!nt no significant impacts related to a moving and
storage busineso, locating within this industrial center.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission Wzt make all the following
findings in or er o'kopprove this application. Staff cannot make
the following findings::
1. The proposed ust is in accordance with General Plan, the
objectives of the Development Codes and the purposes of the
Industrial 5pecif,,c Plan Subarea in which the si,-. is located.
2. That the proposed zise will not be detrimental to the public .
health, safety, or, welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements In the vicinity,
3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of ',,he Industrial Specific Plan,
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This itom.has peen advertised as a public hearing .
in tne j QMr=� t frawspaper, the p� operty posted, and notices
sent to a ppr`opeF Lwners within 300 feet of he project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the abovid analysis and Facts for
Condition r Use Permirecommends 8 -43 through n adoption of ithe dattached
Resolution,
Re L11 wZ'd,
ell
ad Bu e
Ci nn
BB:CK :mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Description from Applicant
Exhibit "6" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "D" Truck, Parking
Resolution of Denial
A Solely owned moring and storage company. Currently Dimas. T ty P.—r arily speciali.2e in hArna F _.._� _. y located in S� an
5 -
e
are
: U0 - 5:00 24on -
sl1
ITE . C. u? 8
Tm,z Rapti rarer
parr: —.A .,SCALE: . ,
LJI
Bi� : * -9 -
um
IL-NiNiffrt.
i'
ITEM.- UP �
IMF
CITY F ITEM[: CUP 81.
TPA -A
�PL&"INTG DIVISION Ex
�T�-- SCABS: _
E
UC MOM A
PLANNING DIVISION �
G:
�i
CUP Aia.ux
LE 1lids rt.1A ,`i
RESOLUTE;! NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING commiSSION OF THE CITY
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYIhqG' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-43
FOR A MOVING AND STORAGE USE IN LEASED SPACE OF 10,000
SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING MULTI- TENANT INDUSTRIAL
PARK ON 3.8 ACRES LOCATED AT 9734 AND 9740 SSIXTH STREET
IN THE GENERAL INOUSTRIAL DISTRYCT (SUBAREA 4) AND MAKING
FINoims IN SUPPORT THEREOF. - APN: 259- 211 -32 AND 33.
A. Recitals.
(i) Art Olmstead has filed an applicat.' t for the issuance of the
Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -43 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On the 9th of November, 1988, the Planni.:; Ct.,n" �n of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing : that data.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deter...'ned and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all �f the facts
set forth in the Recitals,. Part A, of this Resolution c, a true and ccrrect.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented 'to this Commission
during the above - referenced public heaving on November 9, 10r , including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission herR,by specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 9734 and
9740 Sixth Street with a street frontage of 619 feet and lot depth of 275 feet
and is presently improve' with a multi - tenant industrial center and 62
parking spaces of 9' x 19`; and
tenant industrial , the property o the south Hof that site consists of multi-
tenant industrial, the property to the east is multi- tenant industrial, and
the property to the west is multi-tenant industrial.
trucks; whereas cthe site a s not proposed
eveloped with sufficient itruck 1c d ngbspices
large enough to accommodate these bobtail trucks.
i
o�
No Pem8847 N p9'
p `49e z ee 9, 1988S�fl
aisle on
the
north sfd� at the bob
f ta;
facts set e.ab �O.e u Zb he buf7di ',.trucks would obstruct concludes esof t)oWe Aa ag hPsubl {�a hea47.evftlenc uct the cfrcu7at•
ion
(a) Cep era t the Are and 2 a6 ve,a hfspon he peto this Comrnfs
Co ) �7an t;� use is rte son he Ffn�9s C&
°ca ed nP7anh su -U @a°ses�e o f, f the p e th the and
(b) de d ohm pr °Po.Rer� In whf the ihelF,�{ � 7 fte t A
S
ble7 fay enta7 toPP "l fcab7e e, toget
or fmpr�'V ar %?rtethe Pub?fc thereto er °�fth t
fc) ements 'n ally f health wf7r he
That the �furf , saf ba
Of the Proposed use he fernftyus t0 g operafeO
1' 2 and 3 abo cased upgCfffC Plancabie Prc tStonSsot° cojqp)y wf
e n the f the th each
Of this Resd)u rne, Sec aa►arrfssIon hereb de tonc/uS�ro IndustrfaF
APPROVED on. ry to this Commas oRS a applicatfenth in para9ra h
p
E� a77 certf
PZANryINB C�ryISSIOry D AaOpTED
Ti. 9- H DAY QF fy to the adoption
aY. arr OF 1f CIS OF RANCF/0 C NCyBLR, 1988.
e
, a
AirfSr. rman
ra
�crearY
Ll
RESOLUTION NO,
CUP 88 -43 - 01,4S' EAo
November 9, £988
Page 2
e
(d) Thdt the bobtail trucks would obstruct the circulation
aisle on the north side of the building,
3, Based upon the s"bstantial evidence presented to this Commixsion
during the above- rei�,reraced pualrc heating and upon the s g
pecilfic findins of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That 4e proposed use is not in ;accord with the
General Plan, the obiactives of the Development
Code, and the purposes of the Industrial
Specific Plan subarea in which the sits
located..
(b) That the proposed use, together with thp,
conditions appittabie thereto;, will je
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in tC,e vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use does not comply with each
of the applicail-o t=rovisions of the Industrial
Specific Plan,
5. Based upo, the findings and conclusions set forth i±z paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Cois!�Ion hereby deaies the application.
6. The Secretary to this C.orsMission shall certify to the adoption
of this Reso.ution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTEn THIS DTH OAY OF N0VMgER, 1988.
PLAN41NG C". ISSION 05 THE CITY Oir RSsCHO CUCMONCX
BY;
aarry . ,c e , - rm.n
ATTEST-
Brad
" Bv er, ecre ry — --
RESQLU'T' l
3 CUP 84 -43 x OviS 'E U
Novi der g, 1988
Rage 3
I* Bran Buller, Secretaty of the Planning Commission
CuEa of the City of, Rancho
mc na. ft that the Of
Resolution was duly and
regular) introduced, passed, and adopted by the Kanning Commission o€ the
City of ' incho Cucamonga., at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on .he 9th day of jovem er, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit:
KES: Ca- SSIOHERSt
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
i
r
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCA;NONGA
. STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 09, 2988
TO: Chairman and Members of the banning Commission
FRO14: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Steven Hayes, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: E I INMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CGNDlTIONAL USE PERMIT 88-35
e efe op Tien o a oncep ua
master Plan 70-r-7-D acre neigi;borhood shopping center,
including specific approval of a 2.9 acre Phase I
consisting of two retail shop buildings of 13,024 square
feet and a service station of 2,187 squara feet on land
zoned "Village Cercial Center" located at the northwest
corner of Base 'ine Road and Victoria Park Lane - -APR.,
227- 1111-28,, 34, -5.
I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIC4:
A. Actlon Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to
esta s`t ' -wasti of a neighborhood cemmercial center and
Issuance of a Negative declaration.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning.
or tt" ` scan um. 13 'density Residential (14 -�24
dwelling units per acre).
South - Vacant; High Density Residential (24 -30 dwelling
units per acre).
East - Single-Family Residential and Nursery, Medium Density
Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre).
West - Vacant Medium High Density Residential (14-24
dwelling units per acre).
C. General Plan�Designaa4tons:
Project ite = Fe!'d`tum"fT girt Density Residential (14 -24 dwelling
units per acre),
North - Medium High Density Residential.
South - High Density Residential (24-30 dwelling units per
acre).
East - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per
acre) .
West - Medium High Density Residential.
ITEX C
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
CUP 88 -35 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
November 9, 1988
Page 2
0. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and covered with,
natiie vege a TbRK.—The easterly boundary of the site is the
fully landscaped and improved Vic ":aria Park Lane.
E. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Rotio Required Provided
Retail /Commercial 13,024 1/250 53 66
Service Station, 2,187 3 spaces 9 9
plus 2 per —
service bay
Total 15,211 62 75
F. A licable Reggu_lations: The Victoria Planned Community Village
ommercia ern e�Tone allows retail /commercial shopping
centers and service stations, subject to the approval -of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. General: Hughes Investments is proposing to use two of the
propose three buildings (approximately 13,024 square feet) for
retail /commercial uses and the other building (approximately
2,187 square Feet) for a Chevron gasoline /service station (see
Exhibit "B "). This project area is Phase I of a two phase
project. Phase I encompasses approximately 2.9 acres of an
eventual 16 acre shopping center (see Exhibit "C "). It should
be noted that the Conceptual Site Master Plan (Exhibi L , s
rove a or Informational ur oses on c• I us.,ra e ow ne
en ire 1 acres a cou iopear atoka u i1dout. `
Victoria Park Lane and Base tine Road will be fully signalized
to reduce the potentia" for accidents associated with increased
traffic flows.
Associated with this project is Parcel Map 11838, which is
being processed concurrently by the City's Engineering
Department.
The primary issues related to locating these types of uses
adjacent to existing and approved residences are screening,
parking availability and off -site circulation.
B. Screening: As shown in the Conceptual Master Plan, to the
nor s Tract :23873, an approved 124 unit condominium
11
11
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
CUP 88 -35 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
givember 9, 1988
Page 3
development. Most likely the condominiums will be constructed
before Phase 11 of the neighborhood center, hence, staff has
the that the additional c�buffer along and provide
estern boundaries of Phase Tof
neighborhood th i (ohpad RtbetweenTrac3873and Phase II also helps to scree,') the
loading dock area.
C. PPaar�i_ng The Development Code requires one parking space per
MO square feet of shopping center use. Service stations must
have three parking spaces plus two parking spaces per service
bay. Since the service station has three service bays, nine
parking stalks must be provided. Only Aeven parking spaces
surround the proposed service station. However, when
calculating the requirements for the rest of the Phase I
shopping center at th,, i space per 250 square foot ratio, 53
parking spaces are necessary. The site plan includes 66
parking stalls for this shopping center area, or 13 more than
required by the Development Code. BY utilizing two of the
extra 13 spaces provided, the service station will meet its
parking requirement of nine spaces.
D. Victoria Park Lane Median Location: The proposed design of
Iffis--p-r-o-je—CY-1-S—Te-pe—ndent —up—W relocation of the median
opening and the related driveway within Victoria Park Lane.-
Victoria Park Lane is a linear Planned Community received park c Victoria
credit, therefore, should not
be modified to merely facilitate adjacent development. The
deficiencies c in recently original street c eet design. Itewould certain
appear
that a Site Plan could be designed using the existing driveway
and preventing another disruption to Victoria Park Lane so soon
after the c.°ompletion of the City project. Not only will the
proposed work be disruptive to traffic, it will also destroy a
portion of the landscaping that is just now reaching maturity
including several large trees. For the above reasons, staff
cannot support the proposed work within Victoria Park Lane.
Therefore, staff would recommend that the Commission deny the if the P7 project
ommissions should "decide othatdthe work within Victoria anPark
attached approvall Resolutions requir ng that the work within on has been included in the
Victoria Park Lane be subject to City Council approval. The
reason being that the City Council has jurisdiction over City
Park reconstruction.
E. Desi n Review Committee: On October 6, 1988, the Committee
o s o��, Coleman) reviewed the project and recommended
D
Wa-
FLANNING DIVISION ;STAFF RrPORT
CUP 88 -35 - HUGHES INVESi,_,NTS
Wovember 9, 1988
"age 4
revisions. The Following issues: were discussed on the Phase 3
area site pies;
I. C2rculation conflicts in front of the proposed Chevron
Service Station.
2. Adequate tree planting witlin the main plaza area.
3. Project entry statements from Victoria Park Lane and Base
Line Road.
4. Architectural treatment of elevatioojs facing Base Line
Road/Victoria Park Lane.
5. Variation in roof height.
8. Proposed signage should be limited to 18 inch getter
height.
The Design Review Committee (McNeil, Tolstoy, Coleman) i
recommended approval at its October 20, 1988 meeting sub 4 to
the following conditions:
1) The Planning Commission shall review colored
renderings of the stare front areas indicating the
appearance of recessed and protruded areas and larger
caps on the pillars in front of the storzs.
C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been
completed--b-y--the applicant. Staff has completed Part I1 of the
Environmental Checklist and has found no sigWicant impacts on
the environment as a result of this project. The Foothill Fire
Protection District has reviewed this application and is
requiring that th developer participate in a Mello -Roos
Community Facilities District to aid in financing a new fire
station for the area.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS:
1. The proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the
Victoria Specific Plan in which the site is located.
2. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health,,
safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
AMk
."•CANNING DIVISIOU STAFF REPORT
CUP 88 -35 - HUGHES INVEMENTS
November 9, 1988
Page 5
3. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Victoria Specific Plan,
IV. CORRESPONDENCE; This -',;:m has been advertitsed as a pablic hearing
e a y e ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices
sent to a property owners within 300 feet of the project.
V. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission fiels the eyisting
median opening location in Victoria Park Lane is appropriate and
should nct be reconstructed, staff would recommamd continuance of
..he project to allow the applicant to redesign the proposal or
staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Denial to be
brought back at the next meeting.
If the Planning Commission is in favor of the proppsed median
opening location in Victoria Park Lane, staff recommends the
Planning Commission approve Conditional User Permit 58 -35 through
adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of ia Negati ^e
Declaration. Such approval would be contingent upon City Council
approval of changes to Victoria Park Lane modifications.
#Reqse,1W Litt
Attachments: Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
Exhibit "D"
Exhibit "E"
Exhibit "F`°
Exhibit "G"
Resolution
- Location Map
- Site P1ai (Phase 1)
- Site Master Plan
G ,Iceptual Lardscapa Plan
iseptual Grading Plan
- Building Ele —Mans
Building S- ins and Details
)f Approval
IT' OF
- Fo-ANC4
�� � k
PLANNING DIVISION
11
NORTH
ITEM :_._, CUP $9 -3S'
TITLE: _ Le.:a$ tan M- -
'�.
SCALE:
mom
N Rai
=41F. "r],
fioptt-H
CITY oF ITEM: CUP 2R- -2-V
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TME: M-,34t,, Pf"
PLANNING DIVISION, 6-8 F I--
,XHIBIT: SCALE:
CITY OF ITEM-CUP .�. *, ,C*
PLANNING DIiYISION •_ � t •,
M
I
STY OF
,RANCHO
TLANNING
Na
M
X.
CUCAMONGA
DIVISION C'l//
ITEM: 713- 351
TITLE:
Man:
b
r
Z
0
F
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
DIVISION
i I
ITEM. `' V
TITLE: �3,.�„ sic EIK e►Frons
EXHIBIT: SCALE:
�- A,
F
I
m
r-
i�
I O'
IRANCHO CUCAMONGA,
1PLJOINC DIVISION' C-45
I
ITEM � U P `t $- 33'
iTLE-
�i`., SCALE:
A
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9LANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 'NO. 88-35 FOR A
CONCEPTUAL MWER PLkN FOR A 10 ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD
SHOPPING CENTER, INCLUDING, SPECIFIC APPROVAL OF A 2.9
ACK PHASE I CONSISTING OF 13,024 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL
AND A 2,187 SQUARE FOOT SERVXE STATION ON LAND LOCATED
ON THE NORTHWEST CODER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND BASE
LINE R1AD IN THC VICTORIA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. - APN: 227- 111 -28, 34, 35.
A. Recitals.
(i) Hugh.:s Investments has filed an application for the issuance of
the Conditional Use Permit Na. 88-35 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Fermit request is referred to as "the application ".
(ii) On the 9th of November, 1988, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly tiIoticed public hearing rAi the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
R. Resolution.
Now, THEKEr-=°> it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. Thi- Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above - referenced public hearing on November 9, 1988, including
written and ora; staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road with a street
frontage of 743.73 feet and let depth of 350 feet; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property
to the east is residential and commercial and the property to the west is
Allk vacant,. and
6 -lq
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 88-35 - 4UGMES INVESTMENTS
November 9, 1988
Page 2
(c) The property is zoned "Village Commercial Center" by the
Victoria Community Plan.
I
3. Based upon the substantial evider":e presented to this Commission
during the above- referenced public hearing and upnn the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the
General Phan, the objectives of the Development
Code, and the purposes of the district in which
the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, sdfety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the 0evelbpnent Code.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered ins compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Coitgission hereby approves the application subject to
each and every condition set -forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planning Division
1. Approval of Conditional Use Permit 88 -35 is granted subject to
the approval by the City Council and the Parks and Recreation
Commission of the proposed work within Victoria Park Lane.
Further, should consideration be given to the proposed work
within Victoria Park Lane, it is the recommendation of the
Planning Commission that any loss of landscaped parkland be re-
established within the Victoria Planned Community. Location and
size subject to review and approval by the City Council. if the
City Council should deny the proposed work within Victoria Park
Lane, this approval shall W considered null and void.
2. Final landscape plans for Base Line Road shall be consistent
with the Base Line Road Master plan for landscaping.
I
LJ
NE
Cm-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 88 -35 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
November 9, 1988
Page 3
3. The Planning Commission shall review colored renderings of the
store rront areas indicating the appearance of recessed and
protruded creas and larger caps on the pillars in the front of
the stores.
4. A uniform hardscape and street furniture including seating
benches, trash receptacles, free- standing potted plants, bike
racks, light bollards, etc. shall be utilized and be compatible
with the architectural style. Detailed design shall be
submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to
issuance of building permits.
5. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with
the approved site plan which includes architectural elevations,
exterior materials and colors, landscaping and grading on file
with the Pianni7g Division, the conditions contained herein and
the Developmen} Code regulations, and Victoria - Planned
Community.
6. Provisions for the following design features in tha trash
enclosure to the satisfaction of the City Planner:
1. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping
center /the project`.
2. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the
opening of the mach doors and to include self- closing
pedestrian doors.
3. Large enough to acc:ammdate- two -trash bins.
4. Roll -up doors.
S. Trash bins with counter- weighted lids.
6. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis.
7. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out
of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view.
7. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 A.M. and 10
P.M. only.
8. Graffiti shalt be remorLid within 72 hours.
9. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all
times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more
than 24 hours.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 88-35 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
!November 9, 1989
Page 4 ARL
10. All operations and businesses shall be conducted'to comply with
the following standards which shall be incorporated into the
lease agreement of all tenants;
1. Noise level - Ali commercial activities shall not create
any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60
dB during the hours of 10 P.M. and 7 A.M., and 65 dB during
the hours of 7 A.M. and 10 P.M.
2. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading,
unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes,
crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or
other similar objects between the hours of 10 P.M. and 7
A.M.! unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which
would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area.
11. Textuved pavement shalt be pra ided across circulation aisle,
pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick /tile
pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete or a
combination of them.. Full sariples shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building
permit.
12. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural
program. It shall include the plaza area lfghting fixtures,
building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot Lighting
fixtures. The height of light standards shall not exceed
fifteen feet.
Engineering Division
The existing overhead utilities (telecoaaunications and
electrical) along the projects Base Line Road frontage shall be
undergrounded from the first pole on the weat side of the rul-
de -sac street along the project's westerly boundary to the
terminus pole off -site east of Victoria Park Lane, including the
portions crossing and on the south side of Base Line Road prior
to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs
first. ?he developer may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from
future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite
side of the street.
1.
2. Construct 1 -inch conduit with pull rope and pull boxes spaced
approximately 200 feet apart on the north side of Base Line Road
along the projects frontage for the future traffic signal
coordination.
3. The existing private easements (railroad spur, etc.,) along the
project'. westerly boundary shall be acquired in fee to be
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION HO.
CUP 8845 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
November 9, 1988
Page 5
incorporated into the project and to be used for the proposed
ctrl -d:; -sac street dedication. The street shall be dedicated and
improved full wi< :,tit upon Phase 11 development.
A. Base fine Road shall be constructed from Victoria Park Lane to
the project's westerly boundary including the -curb returns for
the cul -de -sac street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
as follows;
a. Full improvements for the north road bed, except that
parkway improvements along Phase. 11 may be deferred until
development of Phase II;.
b. Median island, including landscaping:
c. Minimum 26 foot pavement width for the south road bed;
d. Transitions to meet the existing roadway;
e. The improvements shall be coordinated, if possible, with
the City Base Line Road project; and
s f. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover the cost of the improvements south of the
k centerline from future development on the south side of the
f street.
5. The proposed traffic signal and all pertinent equipment for the
intersection tf Victoria Park Lcne and Base Line Road may
require, a143tional street dedication. Any additional right -of-
way shall be determined in the Plan CheCK process and dedicated
prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. The Victoria Plan Stormy Brain Line A -9 shall be constructed in
Base Line Road from Victoria Park Lane to the proposed cul -de-
sac street at the westerly boundary of the Villago Commercial
Center sites.
7. The developer shall not remove any existing -Zrees w, the
Victoria Park Lane, parkway, except as necessary to reldca ., the
medians and driveways if those modifications are approved by the
City Council.
8. The proposed work within Victoria park Lane shall be approved by
the City Council prior to the issuance of any permits (grading,
building, street, etc.) for the project,
6. The Secretary to this C- mission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
G - Ie
PLA -4ING CZMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CU 88 -35 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
NGvember 9, 1988
Page
APPROVED AND ADOPTED )'ZITS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988.
PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUWONGA
BY: l Ferry a ,fir a-n
ATTEST:
Brad ul er, rz ry
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Manning Csmnission of the City of Rancho
Cui;amenga, do hera-',�y certWj that the foregoing Resolution was, duly and
regularly introduced,, passed, and adopted by the Planning ComAission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning CoswiEsion held
on the 9th day of November, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit::
AYES: COWIcSIONER5
NCES: COP rSSIONEK"
PBSEXT: COMMISSIONERS:
b � Y �� � 9 O•� V pL
i M p Q V Y g
• rr®® VrY Yw �Vd
■arN .�o�Y ~.y�
v �T y4l�BF�M�C
» _ ■ C N �
gg �sli�agg
41:^ SAW
6bqI�Yda��N
1� Y� CM «r V�
E
ry
11
W y
h �
0'!$tn�! r Qua��lt3v
�ru qY �glt ¢ O VCMtN BY
mil
at AY.�VYY
M L q, i0 � l Y
y yy t. p CC
..1� p6�`CMC~ �sVY O.iM 9p aMa iG� N�•`�P
6.
Lp
vad C .c 4�a0 -- �i,�••
w M MM cc
+boa a• t3 `'��E Z +�
4 m �� 4
was
r
Y
i
nq
o
�• w L
M
`yp
R•
1,
�!
d
sa M V V
tt $ •� 1r
}• FA
_Z
ran.. ! yQ�
M Sx
44�OyV
N
yy
U
` -
� R'g'+�
va•
nq
1
Z
W
OrtgIv a r- or no-In v
lb
C Y M T O+ �yF1 YY■rca Y
R H aas Y ii +CY
{H� t `pC� f Gp
pS� YgN�� YYN�Y YOJ
o +
N4C•.. Cti yqj K pm —.1Oz.
RO y' ��My L `•lO C~ A
C N� K L'3 Z, ��M VYC O.CI�F O is
1N' G
Z+`,r� L
$$ wCC6B wy NA M
R Y Y r •�. •� lY�� Y Y
Oil HH.— 311 99T% �rh
! ! !
_3xa 4�
Y
rr� 6
•r O Y
$u g
+
G�
g
IdA
rrc3
r M cp
■C
tit
y,g
NY a
7 VR
r �Q
p �
i M N
V � yCy
1 ^:
+
u
a
i M
+.N
.3 gY&
g 21
gg
Si C[i O M
C y Y>
cc Y^•
i V i 11 W
3 OLN n yr
�►,R wi
M% i ihi V R�
Q _ rs M
O V y
r R yi r
oo N M H {�
14 � ~YO
� � 1ti�
:j`o
As
flf
igr
``�•'°...
`Of
R
C
$
1�
1+ •
!41
a
.
p•M
p�YYYV
1W,
Q V L
$:
r JE
Maw
L Y
yQ
cf
YO
L Y}
1,
•CM R `
�N
�. .•N•
-its
Y
tS••+i•tl
z3ol
Q.
as -gic
jpa
g�0�3y
g t-
4 � tt
��asa g
+ T
g N
w aeY� •p eri ^WHO
.4-4
Y S4YM' }L �•YV
it
M ace me
�I
rM
EN
Original Poor Quality
'^q- ` C Y$ ^Yq q Y » b f Z�+ei Una
y c ISO 4{ r V ^q�pv t{gyi� C ^L C..�e °r L _C eYY O`
R YOO NN Y i4. {A�' '•Q
.�SQ .`O 1 .01..o giOs 0.ue.Ec•'A� 6
cpY
23 %W4
U8y t!�- Ca�Yr��Uac a O � eqC3 �°tiC L
VA
all �X. 4 Z y C Y- Y « 0 ; =a. y�J°C�NN •EcnN � �15
Y iN C pN.h
qso p^ L Vy'V iN VN
IL
` ° °."'. ,. 'J1 kh
�N4L' � >P °� M(1q �° Y �l �Lp OY�V1•GM i�,Y � C °WIC
�pny� -•N N�q A4L C�+cY+gA� ^Y g ��K
,.W ar Lk �yy ^`v(± {�{11A' ,4N L.ceS-
13
i f, Ma MC uww
Y kNO OWN ~ N 3 aM yY N.N 9 T N Z4 Nr`�j
« ^L+ RN{i1h�`nL
yY
B � _�^ _� c. ray' 1q^ .lpc.�cYes�«L'
N M A N C M a.. .0 M N l3 ♦ 1� N CRY w•n 1. ?t r Y C• Y iL 4 V 11. O f 0 M
r 22. V i � "I -0
m,s a .r Zi s�zs 1% `Ygam'
N c _C Yom' O C •e
A Z
y1 Ni.. t1� Y
1.111'
o
qy All
yyC� h '�y rs
TZ
dCC a��u •e �� VpV Y�'Y$'$jj� �i L'O�. �p� �a�Rn+.E�y epV. YY.��ZY
� ^0 6�yY`Z �V Lw V 34 wx �� �V oa• N VO ^� °�i
• N
ail YSM-i Z • �r V '� N �M tZY �C �.'
a ^u�MM
UP s . 241, . g> -
-'d0 • .r M v SS
Ni.�,`R o
gm
�M � y.�X� L c R Z�� ac.� NF »c Mt'LN S• Z��N' �.y°�.�c ^P#
Q ycgp C B
d HZ. V9•c V +f � '41",
V �_ VYYY Vw VwY Y e
pV 40 Mf VyL`
� � < ►°�3 3 duz
NI
W
M
"O
�u ° lit Y Y ' 4
y •°= o � "� poi `•3s� � 's^ ��'��' 4�F�
� ."•.`y!t"� �`g •'slY Z,
rM�M O
all g- � .+�Y° �EY��
■ O
as-- v ate, ya
.Y� °_�i;
eye+ 'a os,cy �' y� vM y�p.{N.1s
q
app w O� Y i
A Y P V pn,. Nj M Yw Y r.J^ W Net! f 1�
Np � pqi «yj. ��NI�I.•Y` �Y�r � g84� ai�y. Y� 3�• � 84(4sNL
L y NO.Y Oi, i�Q • _MOFe Y. gY u1 �t� „N+ ^p 6. «�
F $ 5 .rt one �i u.i�� �v Rjmq H kill aifCf ul A
y N
s N W
1 Z.12 � w
s ■■ R € M O
im
Z7, PI
a'• ~ ,t
er g+ =- , —1--=z � - « —
�_ u�
a q = �.' $ _
1 X0 9 Oyu , i. y:iL y iii_ yV
yyy C
lit rtx�
Y$L £Nei. r_ a=r
Q (y, 1 p" {y1r 6 �1i.
`3a�a't f w NY �YO i Y YQt��N C..i. Y�g1Y zz .O "« � ~ \M
gr
&���..
ai crs� V � �N,�,s O�aC ii ��Y�ePe �"'}@� d"� � �'� .+u .Y•l
M'L'� V, M Sim J` ■�ra�� �r!s' �M Y0® /^t �V4T
«^ d V Nw V Ml iy {3� m Y���111 4
11
ri Orladnat Poor Quality
or a ZXS L e
$ o «a ea
f a
UZ
W yV ~wYW~ M�
w�V•C i_ p# y H w
8,T V^ C L y# 42 M
V •YN Nfj ` «Sj 4Ntl `'Y JC C�I LY
'° "'ML al Ni Oi i Y Nr.6 LC
YA O w Q JQ..�. V
au 4jn��°iyy; ..h A �•���i 1.v
N � � yp� � �y� � ~` y � � �.�F y ti C gr
4y O N +� F W y{t Hs
�.lA ` •�16 L RL M a Y iaL•, Z y YC•1Qy ;' VC.
OOOQQ q _ p G i y Y N' �r
Cwr. a�a «iH r +p'¢Y
la,
_y N•n< ! � �]! Al pa L
}g YwfNl pci LQ. �•y..
N4SL"'..0 AL
en I
° gap bx
340 17 .L gig',«.
g y �, �tl g e g ro4g 1x04 2°
yElkW i7 V
y,��$ I N +r
p q. M M
if az
p g # _
krpt Wq F _ N A N «3;
S If
LI
w �'�d
g
w�
{{��
ag
Ni4
O
O
�
w<
rw`
n
Cpl
y
M
ca
pprgp{��
L N
Yc y�j( Wy0 �4
en I
° gap bx
340 17 .L gig',«.
g y �, �tl g e g ro4g 1x04 2°
yElkW i7 V
y,��$ I N +r
p q. M M
if az
p g # _
krpt Wq F _ N A N «3;
S If
LI
w �'�d
�
01
wYY
N�OS4S 7.�
�ti C A A4i
Y$g
4[lGEi��S�mf1�Y ��Y`�0 ��3�tiry�'a
q
M
y
i
►'�w P.
It I
Qp
9
'�
ant
r y�q■
Fl,
9�y
C�Y•
tn'
O..�LLO
D
®�pJ~
C
o MY
is
�:YU
Q.�.
v
C
� �'ari
f
�t7 ioay'r.°
{� t '..
_
r
u
OL
Y..�
Yqt
rY
y 9
CO
M9�i
sq`
+i
�`
�1
da�
YyYL
LaAi �• �.
VP
uN
.0
u 9
yr Cr
ry.
N
1p •..
■■
..ACS
i�
V
y
E`
i
c
0=
C^
a,.•N
O
�
0
, +MG
KqA
LOp.
wL
yNO
OAR
�
Y
M J
C�YO�
pNiCCY
N
y
L,
�,�
v0
^•
7Nq
e.+
a
C�
3eeY
^
LN
w
N.
�'.i
C
=C
V�,Ey_
"I
4
COa
Y
C:!
�Y
Y/WCY
'^J LOV
YO
`�.
Y
1.5 .
YL
Lw1!_.c
�C1.
y
CVF
4i
4Y
Y
rC.W
jOl
OEx.
O L
?qbN
ss
'U
GC�
N
��
'
��y y0
O
�^
,y
Y•.
YP
'.
CQgV
�'•. �
�a
O N
SCOL
CL fa
'Cid
YYYY
ap
yrr
Ypp
pyt
c,C
$aa
'
��
a Oy
R.�
D •
mILT1
v�
q.Y'.
�
V
C
^•�q�
��
�;5
N'
yga.Y
Z -.gyp-
-5e
4.i
�
sL
$�
yyi�C
11 t.
.
vYSC
G
V
°�w+y
4�6C�y
Y`
NV
{ ®.
�VM
aYY�
b`N
Shytcq,'
�,^
ep�
yoe,.
4
pt
6�y"" �F
491•e
qr.L
ENE
O.
.CH
0C
WYMLLN
=
L�
nCd
'C
,,C9C
ISO
Y C
�NyW
n
� M
P•NA
m
IK
kl
n
01
wYY
N�OS4S 7.�
�ti C A A4i
Y$g
q
M
y
i
►'�w P.
It I
`�
9
ant
r y�q■
O
Y
x
arise
�'[y� y9
®�pJ~
o MY
is
NN■
C
� �'ari
f
�t7 ioay'r.°
{� t '..
_
r
u
r
Q
11CLIJ
y
r
y 9
CO
M9�i
sq`
�`
�1
da�
YyYL
LaAi �• �.
VP
uN
.0
u 9
yr Cr
ry.
N
1p •..
y \
as
V
V
i
a,.•N
V L
O
M J
C
y
� �
N♦
j
J
n
01
wYY
N�OS4S 7.�
�ti C A A4i
Y$g
q
i
►'�w P.
It I
`�
9
r y�q■
Y
x
arise
�'[y� y9
®�pJ~
o MY
is
NN■
C
� �'ari
f
�t7 ioay'r.°
{� t '..
_
r
u
Q
11CLIJ
y
r
y 9
`iCG
yC
OIL 2M
�O
O••
01
wYY
N�OS4S 7.�
�ti C A A4i
Y$g
q
It I
`�
C.2
r y�q■
Y
^
'
arise
�'[y� y9
®�pJ~
o MY
is
NN■
C
� �'ari
ga s
�t7 ioay'r.°
{� t '..
♦j
p
q N ~
y 9
`iCG
yC
OIL 2M
�`
�1
da�
YyYL
LaAi �• �.
VP
�X
.0
u 9
yr Cr
O
N
1p •..
Y
W
i
V
Lo-1
a
a
LI
L
O C p
n p
b Y b {�'►
qM Y
C L C4
C = M O L
O �qY
r
C N cOO
3 �
o � §a
0
l�6 CCCpy
♦" O w Y .... NM
d�w y =r
O Y 0
' M'! O
Ara YM t1
�3p t
m
°
Z
Y O
�
\yJ cc
6.S
+
JI
W Y
Va s O
q �
V Vgq
.ey�yQ�
tl
G
E ®V
O
L
u
S pw
h�,
y(�
_Z
6�w �
�u
■g FNF ql
}p
a.L
w
�j ^d
Q Ov
9tl Myy(
$ L y
qqp O3lfl
Y
S!
9 q
'•^
N 9
N
�
312
Q
� "I
OppV..M
YLS.
W
i6
L�NE
NpMMM�
b
pYL
Y
Y=
NO V
�iia
q
NC w
Y C V
g
=Exe
ti
�a
C
Dv
Pt r Q
a L
c
O
L M
L
•q
+o
8
Y�
•Y• a
�L
��
a a:$
�Yw�
GY
KN
72
�iS
C4i�V >npE
I�NY ��
iW r
al
y
1.
011016a1 Poor Quality
'n �i
4 b
`H
Y O
�
\yJ cc
6.S
+
JI
W Y
Va s O
a
��
i
M
G
E ®V
O
L
u
S pw
h�,
y(�
_Z
ONE
«�
}p
T
V
C L/
St
N
�
4u
I.
C j7
� "I
OppV..M
YLS.
W
0yY
`L
wY
b
pYL
Y
$i9v...
«1
q
4
=Exe
�a
�sO.
fey
O
L M
L
'
8
•�3jt
s¢
GY
72
i Ns.�. YI
al
y
1.
S
C
'n �i
4 b
`H
Y O
�
\yJ cc
6.S
+
JI
W Y
Va s O
G
��
YJ
G
E ®V
O
L
u
S pw
h�,
y(�
_Z
ONE
«�
}p
T
V
W
6 - �Gaa�y�(
4u
I.
C j7
� "I
";
4 =«
b
V,N K
z
i
O +
$i9v...
«1
aov� aT.H :it- oroo i.vo:I•I iooaHy nv �v ov�;u t
t
—RECUIVED-
AOL
MY OF VANCHO CUCAMONGA
]r3i7C INS MV'Fe1Q'B`BIE11 TS PLANNING DIVISION
MCLOP14CMT & ACOUISMON 0: COMMERCIA4 PROPERTICL Pi
d98N H. POTTER 71819110 1Ui1eilt2j '8l4l—)l6
November 8, 1088 4
'ilia Fax
Mr. Brad Duller
City Planner
8330 Baseline Road
Ranoho Cucamonga, Capfornia 01730
RE, Victoria Vill;ge Phase I
N'WC Basefte Road / Victoria nark lane
Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -3s
Dear Brad:
As a follow up to out-0 conversation today in regerd to our proposed
relocation of tha southerly median opening on Victoria: Park Maine, as
-- icv.saed it was not made clear to me until last Tuesday that staff's
oph- sitior to ol-,r relocation of the mesdian was based solaly on lost park
land which the Viatorl& Plan Community rea.ived credit for when the
landeoapo m*+&ns were oavasWueted. It was expressed to me by angineariag
! at the Design R;,dew and Technical Review Committees that there are no
technical reamns for TK retreating the median opening. kbving the opening
80 feet ft iher north p ovides a longer left hand turn stacking for oars
turning left, Aram Victoria ierkr Igne onto Baseline Road, As you known, we
are only talking about relocating the opening of the median which would be
accomplished at no d1sruption to the traffic movement oa Victoria Park rI.I %.e
and at no expense to the city. Additior.sly, none of tha large trees
existing in the north',rly median would bo lost, they would simply be
relavated to the eatended southerly medi&e..
I ha vas attached 'b? your drfoamati % and review a calculation prepared by I..
F. Davuldeou Associates, Inc. which describes the net loss of app.- oximately
1728 square feet of landscaped area as a result of our proposed ralioeatidn
of the median opening. Should the Planning Commissions support our
relocation of the exdsOng median opening, we would then pro-Rose as a
resolution to the lost .1728 square feet of landsoaped area the following
801tAtion :
Upon ommtruchon of thu Phase Two development we (Hugh Investments /The
Witham Lyr,�n Com- many) would agree W set "do 8000 square feat of park area
wWch Would be adjacent to the ft!ating linear park along victoria Perk Lane
a;cd cruld be incorporated into that mdating park land. I have attached a
site plan rn whioh I have designated the approximate ioo&*m where we would
agree to act aside the 2000 square feat for additional park land.
TWO CORPORATE PLAZA • SUITE 259 • NEWPORT BEACH. CA 02060 -7022
P.O. BOX &700- NEW"RT BWA.CH, CA 02658 -3700
17141 750- 94$31 ^ G% . PAX.17IAI 752 -olaa
SEr+ BY:A ;11- 8-88 1;48PM : 18884 714 987 6,499 ;# 3
Mr. Brad uller
Movem' wr s, 1956
Page k
r
{ I think you would have to agrse thA1t in addition to increasing the lost park
f land by 300 sq=n feet we are also ; ,providiing an am WhIbh will bs> far
usable by the residents of Victoria , hsn a landscape area in the center of
the atr4et median. I am certain the.A the ad;Jaoent residents would Strongly
support our proposal as well. W�, do understand that this proposed
relocation would be subject to 6ppf-o val by the City Council wbdo: has
jurisdiction over city parka.
We du hope that staff w9Jj strongly support ghat we have suggested aborm and
I look forward to working with -.Uff on the develogmant of this project. I
would appreciate the Piannk%g "Commissioners reviewing a copy of this letter
for tomorrow nights hearing.
Vary* truly yours,
IiUf3IiE8 IPtVEjB;d
, 6hn E. Potter
JBPInyc
Q�
ffi
.10
Plyl live vilooll.
188844 714 987 64991.#
SENT BY:A
4
II
s11- x-86 1:S0PM
18884- 714 93? 649-9;# 15
J.P. ®oovidson Ammociatem, lime$.
MOINEEMING PLANNING SURWIrtNe ARCNI1' CmfM LANt!;aGAP'c CtillecrtlRE
RECEIVED
NOV 4 igcc
Wdo 114VBTMWS
MENCAAIND"m
TO: John POtta,:. Hughes Snv(j +; ment8
FROM Don J. Edison, .:`.F, Davidooft ASSOCiatcsd Inc.
RE: Victoria village, Median Relocation
Victoria Park Lane
Dual November 3, 19,40
� ,r a tr � ,e � $ a a a r � is � � f � a � t i, t • s a e r a ,� t to
Change in Landscaped Median areas with relocation of Madjau
opaning.
Loss of 2864+ oquare feet of landscape area.
Gain of 1,13v+ aqua::e feet ^f landscape area.
Net change is a 1086 Of aFVxoximately 1,728+ :square feet of
landscape area.
Ddb: ci1A
73-06b EI PaC:xs, Suits 193
PNIM loan, CA 9226D
1619) 34&6691,
388;1 temm. &mg
P C. arc 493
11200 S, MI. Ylmon A".5unr "D"
F+1v@t k*CA92602
0040n, CA 92324
0141023.1082
1714)981W644
FAX 711418655it
73-06b EI PaC:xs, Suits 193
PNIM loan, CA 9226D
1619) 34&6691,
J-1
I
— - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 8, 1888
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM. Dart-ye R, Hans n, Senior Civil Engineer
BY: Jop Stofa, Jr. Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ENVTM4W-N?AJ errFrcucus AM
e0i,
INVLbMTSENTS - su v s on o _ _ "'"' nu�xn ►a
t e ctor a Planned Community. located on the northwest corner of
Baseline Road and Victoria Park Lane (APN 227- 111 - 28,34,35).
I. PROJECT AND SITE L'ESCRIPTIAN:
A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentst ve Parcel Kap as
s obi wn on xExWTt "D"
B. Parcel Size:
Narce .6 Acres
Parcel 2 1.3 Acres
C. Exi_- _sting Zon3n�;
t�i�'f age`�onraercial
D. Surrounding Land Use:
Wirth --Vac" ant
South - Vacant
East -- Uursery
Best - Vacant
E. Surrounding Genaral Plan and Dave4opment Code Je,ionatient-
or - es en a
South - Residential
East - Residential
Wiest - Residential
F. Site Characteristics:
e s to s vacant with the land sloping approximately 2 -7/2% to
the south.
3I. ANALYSIS:
The rctrpose of this Par ,-el Map is to create 2 separate parcels. A (�
commercial /retail center is plarned for Parcel 1 and a servico station
for Parcel 2. The remainder Parcei,will be developed -- a later date as
IIE.4 D
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PM 11838 - HUGHES INVESTPINTS
NOVEMBER 9, 1988
PAGE 2
Phase II of the Master Flan for the commercial enter. The proposed
projects for Parceli I and 2 are on tonight;, agenda as CUP 88-35, The
Parcel lines i>> relationship to the site Master Plan are shown on Exhibit
«CV.
Baseline Road street improvements from Victoria Park Lane to the future
cul -de -sac street will be completed with the first Phase of development.
As is discussed in the stiff ?'apotl for CUP 88 -35, staff toes not support
the proposed design of the developrsent for Parcel 1, because of the
required i r Commission hdeteeto deny CUP Vi$ 3S, or continue for redes gn,staff elstDat
this Parcel Flap should, also be continued or denied to make sure that the
Proposed parcel tines are compatible with the new project design.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW; The applicant corr4ftted Part I of the Initial
5u yc?`. "�af'�o"`ducied a field investigation and completed Part II of
the Initial Study, No adverse impacts upon the environment are
anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative
Declaration is appropriate.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Pub?ic Nearing have been sent to surrounding.
property Demers and graced in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the
site has also been completed.
V. RECOMENDATION. It is recommended true `' Planning Commission consider
aT au`t and elements of the ten;4,.ive Parcel Map. Upon such
consideration, the Planning Comission appears to have the following
options:'
I- If CUP 88 -35 is approved, th;n adoption of the attached resolution
and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. .
OR
2, If CUP 68-36 is deafed or continued, then this tentative Parcel Map
should be continued with tfra Developer's consent, or denied without
prejudice and a resOlution reflecting tfat action returned to the
next truing on the consent cvlendar.
Respectfully submitted,
eyL
Barre Nanson
Scour Civil Engineer
BRH :JS:Iy
Attachments,., Vicinity Map (Exhibit "All)
Tentative ?dap (Exhibit 118"')
Master Plan (Exhibit "C ")
Resolution and Rbco msended Conditions of Approval
�i s
1
s
E
t.
VACANT
,.,w
PrM-,, PMEEL MAP a 2 a i
T M a. - m N M- $ nj Y- 9- MMAA
� I
l
IMIM
1�r
i
`s �J
a1
•i. #h $ �.� . • !a % ' III
1j Y w K Y9 I
MY O 1
AJhRANCHO C (fie GA �•{�y1 --- -�•�sf ({�� }1��'�i.r
DWMON
RESOLUTION Nil.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA;iCHO
CUCA,MONGA. CALIFORNIA, CONDITIORALLY APPROVING TE.4TATIVE
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11838, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
BASELINE ROAD AND VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKiNG FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THE: �OF . APB =2? > 4? -2s3,, 34, 35
;INEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11838, submitted by Hughes
Investments, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing iato 2 parcels, the
real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 227 - X11_28 34 35
located on the northwest corner of Baseline Roa and i►fi toria_P.a,�e Lan" and ;
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1988, the Planning CormiIssion held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above - described map.
FOLLOWS, NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMON33A PLANNING COMMISSION PMSSOb xD AS
SECTION 1: 1-bat the following findings have burn made:
I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the prc,ased subdivision %
consistent with i e General Plan.
3. That the site is Physically suitable for the
propsed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial env':ronmentai d mage, public
health problems ov, have adverse affil on abutting
property.
SECTION 2: ''ris Commission finds and certifies that the project has
been rev 'Fe . an considered in compliance with the California Er yip ntal
Qualify Ac` of 1970 and, further, this Comrnissjua terea; ics;�es a Negative
Declaration
SECTION J: That To _ative Panel Yap No, 11838 is bereby approve:i
subject to t _—"attacried .andard C09ditiosss and the following SpeL al
Conditions:
PI.ANNTNG CGWTSS JN RESOLUTION NO
pV 1I83B K- HUGHES IWE ENT$
NOVEMBER 91 2988
PASE 2
S, +he existing overhead utilities ttelecoffmnications and
electrical) slang the Project's 8:,seltfoe Road frontage shall be
urdergrnurtded From the first Peale on thk WA-St side of the future
cul -de -sac :street along the Project's tmsterly baund&Vy to the
terminus Pale offsite cast of Victoria Park Lane, including the
Portions crossing and on the south ide of Baseline Road prior
to Public ^,40ruvement acceptance or Occupancy, whichever occurs
first for any Parcel. The Developer may request a reimbursmnt
agreement .4 recover* one -half the City adopted cost far
undergrau,,Iing from futut'e dovetcPnfent (redevelopment? as it
occurs o; the aPPasite side of the street,
2. Construct Wt-'Ch conduit with pull rope and Pull boxes spaced
upproxiruttdly 200 feet aWt cn the north side of Baseline Road
sung the Project's frontago for the future traffic signals
:aanrdinatian.
S. Baseline Road shall be constructed from Victoria Park Lane to
the Project'$ wasterly boundary including the curb returns for
the futuru cul-de-sac street to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer upon development of aw parcel as follows:
a. Full improvements for the north roadbed, except that Parkway
improvements along the remainder parcel may be deferred until
development of the remainder Parcel;
b. Median Island, including landscaping;
c. Minimum 26' Parr %anent width For the south roadbed=
d'. 'transition$ t- •V*s the exlsti ,. roadway;
e. The improvements shah be coordinated, if pGSSible, with the
City ftseline toad imject; and
The Developer may request a refilbuesement agreement to
refrocove
st fur the cost if the *"Ovements south of the centerline
ture development oa the south side of the street.
4. The Proposed traffic signal aitd all P :rtinent equipment fay- the
intersection of Victoria Pa,•k We and Baseline Road W require
additional drined sin dedication. Plaro.�n ch ck process nand idedicatio s $made
accordingly.
6. 'the Proposed madlficati ^.,,s to Victuals Park Lame associated with
the developpmWent of CUP Q -vg are s�tject to spproval by the rifer
Council. inerefore, the final PaNA', Ma Shah dod
until the design for Cop 89 -35 hat been coq�leted. h tsa�rt
parest lines shall coorespacd to tie final taProved design for
CUP 8E -36.
Moe
07t'1 -0 2 0 11-9 -88 PC Agenda 2- of 3
lu
P
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO
PM 11838 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
NOVEMBER 9, 1986
PAGE 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF ROV£MBER 1988,
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOW
BY:
Larry T. McKiel-,—Cfi-aj—rmaj,
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoirg Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission herd
on the 9th day of November, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
HOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONEMS:
6
E
a.
b
S
�Y
i=
A
Cri91nal Poor Quad'
I
Em
0
4
it
11 r
w
—. sy
Mg
S
8 i
p
`
k
it3
a
Yf
l
-
_N
v
a
n Y
O
yy
a:
—
� s
�
a
- is
�`
S
z
i
s
O�
�^�yy Y
p0.
mom`
a
V
is$
y
fs—s
i
.3 3-
a
a
y
11 NO
�
�
ry
6n
■
Y S
1'
Q A.
tl
u
r N
^
r
�«
{ x{ D --V
na-
sit
��oa
$i
's
«
6.1
PZ
1
I
Em
0
it
11 r
—. sy
Mg
S
8 i
p
`
k
it3
a
#
l
-
_N
v
a
` -
•
;$a
a
p
2 W
d$
�
w
3r hi.s
i
�2 co
0-
y
fs—s
�� � Y s• a Y
i
.3 3-
a
a
y
11 NO
�
�
ry
■
Y S
1'
Q A.
tl
u
r N
^
r
y
{ x{ D --V
I
Em
0
Mg
S
8 i
p
`
k
it3
a
l
-
_N
v
a
i�
;$a
a
p
. s
d$
w
3r hi.s
i
�2 co
0-
r
I
Em
0
v
a
y�
h
tl V4�
w=�
y N ♦
O y
� �`.
r x A
v. WaPr4. t
Rs
M
�
Q
y
aK
S r
g�
=.q
Y` b
y
fit
3-.!,
O
a $
«
11f
eV
H
r N RI
oa,
Jf + y
e$.%
�
M
V
Y
rc
�yy�
G W
v' 'Y
pc
i'- s
^ L V
=- ZZ
A
` sit*
s
b'g
i[NY i
x
A�
g
4
b a S
x=
r x A
v. WaPr4. t
Rs
M
�
Q
y
aK
S r
g�
•-,, nw
E9
Vic° ¢_8
a $
L
r N RI
oa,
Jf + y
. �b ;b
sp
lil
15 W
N R
Is a
W
q � t
O y
s p
! yf
f
Original Poor Q "au
^9
1 P
242
hi•�
v. WaPr4. t
Rs
M
�
Q
y
aK
S r
y
V
y 4
� �
Nil
e$.%
�
M
+I
�
v. WaPr4. t
M
�
Q
y
aK
S r
y
qN
y 4
+Y
i
v. WaPr4. t
i
UAaE:
TO,
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA
STAFF REPORT
November 9, ')88
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Scott MWAY, Associate Planner
Di strict (1 -2 dwei y in units ... �. � -c -' `"'° KrIb l ueac-1 a l
Specific ? g per acre) of the Etiwanda
designation l(2- 4�dwelli the Low Residential g units per acre), located �west lof
rtiwanda Avenue between Summit and kfighland Avenues -
APN: 225- 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 555, 61, and 225 -171-
Q1, Ong, 10, and 17,
ENVIRONMLaTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 8P -16 - PULSAR - A
reques co re uce e m n ram eet t3
94
esidee tial$subdivisionAof 174 single fasi,n!y ices on 77,33
acres of land located west of Etiwandi Avenue between
Summit and Highland Avenues. - APN-, 22.'x- 1r-1 -3y, 36, a7,
38, 49, 53, 55, 61, and 225-171.2, 09, 10, and 17.
I. BACKGROUND: On August 24, 1988, the Pianring Commission reviewad
ind unan mausly approved '_'entative Tract 13812 and Variance Be-
16. Following the planning Commi'ision meeting, two appeals were
filed with the City Council by area residents. The first appeal
wzs filed by tue owners of the e'tf `.irg house to he preserved on
Lot 76 within the suhdivisisn as it rolated to the location of "F
Street between Cot 76 and Lots 105 and 106 (see Exhibit "C" of
August 24, 1988 planning Commission report). The second appeal was
filed by the homeowners of the existing house located at tha
southwest corner of "C° Street and "G" Street regarding the amcurt
of dedication required for "C" Street and the lack of a requirement
for a block mall along the south side of "C" Street to protect
their house.
On October 5, 1g8 , the City Council conducted a public hearing to
receive input on thc- two appeals. In reviewing the first appeal
regarding the locatica of "F" Street, the City Council noted that
the Planning CC'afssion had not addressed this issue because the
item was not raised as a concern during the Planning Commission
meeting. As a rreccit, the Cit. Council referred the location of
'IF" C +5004 ;vim _
ITEMS E b F
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 13812 & vA 88 -16 - Pulsar
k3vember 9, 1988
Page 2
In considering the second appeal, the City Council felt that, whine
the amount of dedication proposed was significantly more than what
would usually be accepted, the safety of the existing homeowners
was a concern due to the collector status of "C" Street. The
Council therefore reccmmended that the item also be referred bacfc'
to e ann-` omm ss an w 1!,:! Zrec on o ursue e
oss 1f a an scaape and s` ew8 easemen_a Non. a sou
side o _ ree ano LnaL a bloc wajl be col7SCt'!JG
H. ANALYSIS: Following the City Council meeting, the applicant has
een wcr ing to revise plans to address both concerns raised in the
letters of appeal. "F" Street, between "A" and "K" Streets, has
been relocated to the east side of the existing residence on Lot
104 (see Exhibit "A ") . By doing this, the owners of the house on
Lot 104 will be able to retain V a area west of their home in its
present condition.
In redesigning the subdivision, the applicant has also relocated
"C" Street six feet to the north, thus providing tN* entire 66 foot
dedication on their property. The parkway improvements on the
south fide of "C" Street adjacent to the existing residence can be
completed and a block wall can now be constructed.
With the*modificatio;is made by the applicant, it appears that the
concerns of the residents have been addressed. Staff has been in
contact with the residents and they have indicated their agreement
to the concept submitted by the applicant. The residents have
indicated, however, that a few minor details are being worked on
with the applicant.
With the modifications to the tract map, all of the lots conform to
the development standards within the Low Density designation of the
Development Code.. Therefore, the variance requested for the lot
depths is no longer necessary.
III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve a revised design for, Tentative Tract 13812 through
adoption ?f the attached Resolution with conditions.
c.i zy- ryanner�
88:SM.vc
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
TT 13812 & VA 88 -16 - Pulsar
November 9, 1988
Page 3
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Revised Tract 'Map
City Council Staff Report of October 5, 198k
Planning Commission Staff Report of August 24, 1988
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
CITE' CF ITM.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Affr ,
PLAIVN[I/M," HIB1T:— e#—_S�CALE:
1
-`
D
NMTH
� M
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 5 1988
TO Mayor and Flembers of the City Council
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13312 - PULSAR -
residential subdivision ofl 54 single famlly lotspoon7171g.33
acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-.2
dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific plan and
the Low Residential General Plan Designation (2 -4 dwelling
units per acre), located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between
Summit and Highland Avenues - APN: 225- 161 -35, 36, 37, 38,
49, 53, 55, 061 and 225 - 171 -01, 09, 10, 17.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88 -16 - PULSAR - Appeal
of e Planning Commission's decision approving a request to
reduce the minimum lot depth from 100 feet to 94 feet and 95
feet to twa lots in conjunction with a residential
subdivision of 154 single family lots on 71.33 acres of land
located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland
Avenues - APN: 225- 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, 61 and
225 - 171 -01, 09, 10, 17.
I. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a
public hearing and receive all testimony on the project. After
receiving all input, staff recommends that the City Council deny
the appeal requesting the relocation of "C" Street 6 feet to the
north, and uphold the appeal regarding "F" Street and direct the
applicant to relocate "F" Street to the east _'de of the existing
residence, and connect "K" Street with Summit Avenue, subject to
Planning Commission review and approval. In addition, staff
recommends that a carditirn be added to the project requiring the
applicant to join a Mello -Roos District for fire protection.
II. BACKGROUND: On August 24, 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed
and unan mously 1,ppfcved Tentative Tract 13812 and Variance 88-
16. In reviewinr, the proposal, the Planning Commission noted that
the collector scrc-:!+l cutting through the project, C Street, was
originally propf,sed through the middle of an existing lot along the
western portio,j of the site (see Exhibit "D" of the Planning
Commission staff report) . After working with the property owners
and staff, thr applicant subsequently revised the alignment of "C"
Street to run along the northern boundary of the existing residence
(see Exhibit C of the Planning Commission staff report). The
Commission felt this would make for a more logical development of
the existinij lot at some point in the future.
F,-,5
CITY COUNCIL STAFF , ORT
RE: TT 13812 & VA 88 -16 PULSAR
October 5, 1988
Page 2
E
Following the Planning Commission meeting, two appeals were filed
with the City Council by area residents. The first appeal was
filed by the owners of the existing house to be preserved on Lot 76
within the subdivision. It was their feeling that "F" Street
should not be located along the west side of their res•-dence due to
the larga number of trees planted in that area and their desire to
retain the property encompassing Lots 76, 105, and 106 (see Exhibit
"C" of the Planning Commission staff report). They feel that
alternative designs are possible that would relocate "F" Street aid
preserve the laid they wish to retain in its present condition.
The second appeal was filed by the homeowners of the existing house
located at the southwest corner of "C" Street and "G" Street
regarding the safety of a street close to their house and the lack
of a block wall requirement. As proposed by the applicant, 60 feet
of dedication will be provided within the tract boundaries for the
construction of "C" Street. As a collector street, 66 feet
dedication is normally required. The existing residents feel t.
"C" Street should be located entirely within the tract boundaries
and that they should not have to provide an additional 6 feet of
dedication when they decide to develop in the future.
III. ANALYSIS:
A. "F Street"- During the Planning Commission meeting, no
3iscussion took place regarding the possible relocation of "F"
Street, between "A" Street and "K" Street, to the east side of
the existing residence on Lot 76. As a result, no input is
available at this time from the Planning Commission. The
applicant, however, has been working with the homeowners to
provide alternatives to the approved alignment. These
alternatives have been included in your packets for reference
(see Exhibits "B -1" and "B -2 "). if the City Council feels that
additional review of the appeal request is warranted, the
Council may wish to refer this Item back to the Planning
Commission for consideration, Staff can support either
alternative alignment.
B. "C Street": In discussing whether "C" Street should be
re ocafe—d-9 feet to the north to provide the entire right-of-
way within the tract, the Planning Commission noted that, under
most circumstances, the applicant would only be required to
dedicate and install a half street along the property
boundary. With the development of the adjacent property, the
entire right -of -way would then oe dedicated and the road would
be improved to its ultimate width. The Planning Commission
felt that the 60 feet of dedication provided by the applicant,
in conjunction with the road being fully improved from curb to Affilk
curb, was acceptable. The Commission further noted that this qV
arrangement benefited the Rusted's property by 1) r- °,. —iring
significantly less dedication and 2) full street impr,jements
e-F
CITY COU"IL STAFF ► ORT
QE: TT 13812 & VA 88 -16 - PULSAR
October 5, 1988
Page 3
from curb -to -curb. lie parkway could be finished off when the
adjacent parcel is subdivideti. The issue is further
complicated by the fact that the appellant's property is
located in the County; hence, the right -of -way cannot be
dedicated to the City. This would prevent placing the parkway
in the usual landscape maintenance district.
C. "K" Street: There was no discussion at the Commission hearing
regarding—connecting "K" Street to Summit Avenue (see Exhibit
"C"). The appellant has indicated to staff that they are
requesting this connection to provide future residents with a
second access to Summit. There appears to be sufficient
distance for the connection; however, the precise location of
this connection would have to be carefully rev4ewed by the
Engineering Division to insure proper spacing of intersections
along Summit consistent with the City's access control
policies. Condition 2, as presently drafted, only requires the
construction of Summit from the intersection of ' °M" Street
easterly to the intersection of Etiwanda. The portion of
Summit Avenue west a "M" Street was r.;►t needed at this tim6 " <;
service the tract as proposed; therefore, in -lieu fees were
re, 7ired by Condition Sa. If "V Street is connected to
Suwait, then the conditions of approval should be modified to
require that the fulls length of Sundt Avenue be construction.
D. Mello -Raos District: During the preparation of the Planning
emmission Res°sr n, -a condition requiring the applicant to
Join. a Mello -poos Benefit Assessment District for fire
protection *cs inadvertantly omitted. Therefore, regardless of
the action taken by the City Council on the two appeals, staff
recommends that a condition of approval be added to the project
that reads as follows:
"Developer shall commerce, participate in and consummate,
or cause to be commenced, participated in, or
consummated, a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District
(CFD) for the Foothill Fire Protection District to
finance a fire station to serve the envelopment,
including Tand facilicies, equipment and operations and
maintenance. the station snafu be located, designed and
built to all specifications of the Foothill Fire
Protection District, and shall become the District's
property upon completion. The equipment shall be
selected by the District in accordance with its needs.
In any building of the station, the developer shall
comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFO
shall be formed by the District and the developer by the
time of recordation of the final map."
CITY couNc1L STAFF 6, JRT
RE: TT 13812 & YR 88 -16 " PULSAR
October 5, 1988
Page 4
Res c uliy su ed,
ra uli
city an er
BB :SM:ko
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter! of Appeal
Exhibit "B" - "F " :Street Alternatives
Planning Commission Minutes of August 24, 1988
Plz-,ning Commission Staff Report of August 24, 1988
Planning Commission Resolution of Approval
F
Aug. 301 i988
Rancho Cucamonga CItY Council;
We wish to appeal the Planning commissions decision approving
tenitive tract numker = 4=r^ -.
B Ilie.Blan hard
es I and ark
Etikandra/ Ca. 91739
t7l-4> 899 -1918
/- �•��"-
ale
y
h �4;'lP...1G �1f.lON
AUG 311,988
Ct y
T •. c••i
Mr. & Mrs- Andre Andre Rustad
12366 Highland Avenue
Etiwanda, CA 91739
APR' # 225-161-57,
September 2, 1988
Mr. (Mayor and CouncilmembPrs
We are herewith filing an appeal to the Planning Commission's de-
cission on Wednesday, August 24, 1988, approving item "F" Environ-
mental Assessment and Tentative Tract 13812 - Pusar.
As property owners end residents of the immediate area affected by
this development, we are Very worried about the construction of a
collector street appx. 14 feet from our house. Our biggest: concern
is the safety aspect such a street would impose so close tc otxr house,
and Without the benefit of a blockwall guarding us against speeders
and reckless drivers. We do not think a blockwall is too much uv_ _
ask for, since Avery house in this tract adjacent to this roadw,.,
be protected b i
y a blockwall. We realize there is na provision n the
law forcing the construction of blockwalls along colledtor•streets.
However the City has always made the construction of such Protector
walls a stipulation at 1
p arming meetings, as a review of other simi-
lar streets in Victoria and other tracts will show.
We reel that unfamiliarity of the law concerning city vs. county
property compelled the Planning Commission to dis-4 —%a our request
a.r vote in favor of the developer. A simple solution to this prob
leL�. in our opinion, could be to move the collector street an addi-
tional six feet to the north, so it is totally on city property.
"fie would keep our proper setbacks (propane tank etc.) as county law
stipulates, and be able to enjoy the protection of a blockwall. The
City would receive a finished roadside rather than 6' X 330° of brush
h
ding sites 9111through developer
18 all would xceed, the min mumedepth of 100 b feet.
Ile respectfully ask, that our appeal he granted for the above men-
tioned reasons.
Sincerely,
� P 77Z
:r r. & s. Andre Rustad
x, , , Az
102 b! I00 I 33 98 } 9T 96 45 34 93 ` I r .r jY
Na:'�K ��sF�7: c. �r��. er€, �>< r�.:! ��r�ewsr�MRa +r�ecesc►�sr,aw�v..,.x «'�tasr rt� „�..� : .� •S �...
]
If" 67 .r. •y t 1 yM( V�.•1.
104
atmsr T% jr ? U04?- ltta+r' azxssr tate+i +YU r ' a}r.+a taM.•t Ns.r at,I.
77 TB 79, !0 t!1 N2 53 84 t35 8i ®7 5s I
m x `a ♦a y . _f 77 _ >s u
! :c,anu t
75 74 73 7z 71 i4 69 S7 !1
76 g,7osfr Dt+osr tyfcR(w 4I2Saf tRQ1cr 7tw+f 65zos{ j"t � �olySQ� ►�, 4
106
M'a49N1 4? ,
*agar r.xr, a a
P 107 p
QWt -4 w.w't t
o vae vurr u�� a` - ! r i I
`o I oRw4f tla2� 1744 a+yX "(+met. 45ro+,f aaK %{ ei V 14tf�t i� osp lOxyi 'hew, 1. i - x 57•, 53 sir wo $fi 6z e3- -R+ 45 of . ; �' ` - 40 r
N » r�
50 49 40 ' 47 1 46, rr 45 ,
r 5S S4 .r 53 O tr xx° 11 srasr rieaze� 7,xsr ]bw 77NOP t
*.ware ataxy
110
R7i^^Sr " V IVa
unx,s, naa, 119. '" !; +eaea•;< �'` --�
tiff %" 2roQ � rl5 221 t
•19f7 K + a+7Q } w •� "W 4P * •]d'J051 - 7r2R iY' R SA f ' 4 6%— ]r
112 113 114 113 NIS 117 118
r u . � 12� •.t j 1� a ....t��tt
J E r 1 ;a Jar
ST- s- ,' '-'�... Y� �) . 122 ° zQ•sr.�+
l
a«t.. -es- •+Its.._ �' i !23 S 134
-
xA cwt hv: , II _ �
• -' li �I '� 71 :. 235, ., 4
NORTH
CITY CF rrEM: — `- �a7�� 1W4 A? xgt
RA.N UD Cam. TITLE=
M ANNM DIVSKN EXHIBIT: 4'r /f ,
W MYA-; �
VtkKA&E Ow
s�
NORTH
CITY CF rr = 9 . Z %v.* T
'1'n' . ; "' 49 ,,9 , is
4.+r--
e
C7 1-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA- ONG
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
August si, ;.988 °"�• -�
TO:
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM:
Brad Buller, City Planner
B1':
Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
ENVIRO)MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13812
PEW= X residential subdivision or sang a am y
iai:s'on 71.33 acres of land in the Very Low Residential
District (1 -2 dwel)'118 U-Alt.- rcr acre) of the Etiwanda
Specific Plan and 0o Low Residential General Plan
Designation (2 -4 dwe ?ling units per acre), located west of
Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highlan1 ,Avetaues -
APN: 225- 161 -35, 36, 37, 38, 49, a"3, 55, 61, and 225 -171-
01, 09, 10, 17,
ENVIRONMENT", ASSESSkIEN P.i� YrRIANCE vv -1i: P:;LSA`�' ,
reques ore uce e m n' m� u'l:'a'e`p' r rom ;o
ear
94 feet and 95 feet for' 2 Tots ;n conjunction with a
residential subdivision of 154 ssyle family lots on 71.33
acres of land located west of Etiwanda Avenue, betwee„
Strmnit and yighland Avenues - APN: 225 - 261 -35, 36, 37
38, 49. 53, 55, 61, and 225 - 171 -Qi, 09, 10, 17.
I. PROJECT AND S71' SCRI- 7ION:
A. _�F_w_ti__�on�__EeGo, . Appro. l of the subdivision map and Variance
anan aat ..e Negative Declaration.
8. Project Density; Overall - 2.16 dwelling units per acre..
as ern por ion - 1.58 dwelling units per acre..
Western portion - 3,5 dwelling units per acre.
C. Surrounding Land 114• !_and Loning�
North - Vacant Very Low Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per
acre) and County Residential 3
South - Vacant; Very Low Residential G -2 duelling units per
acre) and County Residential 3
East - Vacant, uPry Low Residential (1.2 dwelling units per
acre)
West - Vacant a.id single family residential, County
Residential 3
ITEM E $ F
PLANNING i;"ISSIC TrAFh REPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 13at2 - PULSA4
August 24, 1988
Page 2
11
D. General Plan_Desie- ations:
Project Site - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre and
very low residential less than 2 dwelling units
per acre)
V- - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre) and Open Space
South - Freeway
East - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per
acre)
test - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and
Open Space
E. Site Characteristics: The site is located on the north side of
g.11ind Avenue across frog: the Windrows Village of the
Victoria Planned Community - The project is bounded an the
south by the future foothill Freeway and the north by Summit
Avenue. The property slopes roughly 4 percent from north to
south. There is an existing single family residence located at
the northwest corner of the site that will be incorporated Into
the design of the subdivision,
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Background•
The development of this property is unique in that the eastern
portion of the site presently fQl'ls under the Very Low
Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) designation of the
Etiwanda Specific Plan. The western portion of the project is
presently located outside the City limits within the City's
PlanrasoLownResidential t(2 is 4 designated
wel ingdunits the per City's butrs
currently under the jurisdiction of the County of San
Bernardino. ThL- applicant has, however, processed a pre -zone
application for a Lour Density Residential District which Was
approved by the City Council on June 1, 19;>8. The application
for annexation wily be heard by the Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFC0 on September 21, 1988.
The original plan, submitted by the applicant consisted of 151:
single family rots on 64.82 a'rG of land. The western portion
Of the site was designed in much the same manner as the current
submittal. The eastern portion of the site, however, was
designed using the optional standards of the Very Low
Residential District, providing smaller lot sizes and two park
sites of 3.34 and 3.71 acres. Upon review by the DeLign Review AIRL
l
r
PLANNING COMMISSIO )TAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - PULSAR
August 24, 1988
Page 3
Committee, it was felt that the configuration of the site and
the collector street bisecting the site was not conductive to
the optional standards.
Subsequently, the applicant redesigned the eastern portion of
the site to provide 44 single family lots, using the basic
standards, averaging 27,581 square feet in area. In addition,
the applicant was able to acquire a parcel of land at the
northwest corner of the site resulting in the addition of 28
additional sir�ale family lots (see Exhibit "D " ). Following the
review of the revised plans, Staff met with the property owners
of the existing single family houses located adjacent to west
tract boundary. The rp.idents expressed concern about the
collector street bisecting one lot and being close to the other
single family house. As a result, the applicant has redesigned
the plans to sh;.HZ the collector road to the north of the
second single family;idence.
B. General- The current proposal submitted by the applicant
Tn ia£es lots ranging in size from 7,210 square feet to 56,500
!�:;uare feet in area. The western po -tion of the lot, under the
Low Residential designation, has an average lot size of 9,435
square feet in area. The eastern portion of the site, under
the Very Low designation of the Etiwanda Spec'.fic Plan, has an
average lot sine of 27,581 square feet in area. To provide a
transition between the two density ranges, those lots that
front -on or rear -on to the eastern half of the site have been
enlarged to mc.,e rlosely assimioate the larger lots.
C. Design Review Committee: On May 19, 1988, the Design Review
C0111m•. tec i- Troutil ) recommended approval of the
project subject to the "L" Street connection to the "C" Street
connection being resolved prior to scheduling this item for
Planning Commission consideration. This item has since been
resolved between the applicant and staff and is depicted on the
current proposal (see Exhibit "C " ).
D. Technical Review Committee: nn July 19, 1988, the Technical
Review ommY °ee rev ewe , e proposal for consistency with all
current City standards. The major issue with the development
of the site was the provision for permanent access.
Ultimately, the site will take access both from Etiwanda and
Day Creek Boulevard via Summit Avenue and the extensions of "C"
Street, A temporary access has been provided across the future
Route 30 Freeway and is being allowed at the Locust /Highland
Avenue intersection. This access will be removed and the land
will revert to the underlying lot upon construction of the
freeway.
PLANNING COK41SSIC STAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 13o12 - PULSAR
August 24, 1388
Page 4
Over the past several months, however, much discussion has
centered around whether or not adequate dedications exist to
construct Summit Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue. Based upon
information provided by County surveyors office, examination of
title and deed reports, and the location of structures in line
with what was assumed to be precise alignment, it appears that
sufficient dedication for Sur..wit Avenue is not available. Oa
August 17, 1988, the City Council approved the possible future
use of condemnation action to obtain the necessary off -site
rights -of -way for the construction of Summit Avenue from the
project site to Etiwanda Avenue.
E. Traits Advisory Committee: On May 18, 1988; the Trails
713v sort' COMMIttee—Re7vi—e-w-e-a the proposed development, At that
time, the Committee recommended approval subject to the
following conditions:
1. The lot lines and equestrian trail between lots 9, 17 and
18 should be realigned to the west to provided a' crossing
to the northwest �rrner of the intersection of "C" and "0"
Streets.
2. The local trail on the north side of lot 18 should b�i
eliminated.
3. A local trail should be provided along the south side of
lot 23.
4. A local trail should be provided on thr, south side of lots
19 and 20.
5. A local trail should be provided on the wrest side of lot
1. With the removal of the "L" Street connection to
Highland Avenue this trail should be relocated to the west
tract boundary.
8. A Imal trail should be provided along the south side or
lot 13.
7. The local trail along the east tract boundary need only be
10 feet in width.
F. Variance Request: In conjunction with the subdivision
app ca ion, tWe—appiicant is requesting a Variance to reduce
the minimum lot depth on lots 104 and 105. A Development Code
s requires that lots be 100 feet in tAeoth. Lots 104 and 105 are
95 and 94 feet in depth, respec _.. -4. The Variance request
Ill
r� 6
PLANNING CWISSIO* MAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 13b,2 - PULSAR
August 24, 1988
Page 5
i
stems from the shtftinp of "F" Street further to the west in j
order to preserve;, the exi�;ting garage located on the east side it
of "F" Street. Rs proposhd, both lots 104 and 105 far exceed
the City's requirements fir lot width and lot size, The Lots,
however, could be brought into conformance with the Development
ccrY by relocating the garage and shifting "F" Street to the
was4. Therefore, direction from the Planning Commission is
requested to determine if the Variance should be granted or if
the garage shoul4 be relocated and "F" Street be shifted to
provide lots. 104 and 105 with the minimum required lot depth.
G. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental
ec s , , a as entified two items that potentially
could have adverse impacts on the project - flooding and
noise. With the land north and west of the project being
primarily vacant, staff is concerned that the _project may be
subject to flooding during extreme storms. As a result, a
condition has been added that flood protection shall be
provided along the northern tier lots within the tract or that
easements be obtained to provide the necessary flood protectiv"ti
on the properties north of the project.
With the south boundary being located adjacent to the future
freeway right -of -way, the site may be impactel by noise levels
in excess of City Standards. An acoustical analysis has been
preparev for the project which Indicates that an 8 foot high
barrier, located along the south tract boundary, will reduce
the noise levels to within the acceptable City range.
With the addition of these two mitigation measures included in
the Conditions of Approval, staff 4eels that a Negative
Declaration can be issued for the project.
III. FACTS FOR FINDIFSS: In order for the Planning Commissior, to
approvit the ar ance and the subdivision, facts to support the
following findings must be made:
A. Wriance•
1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a
specified regulation w^ald ,-esult in practical difficulty
or unnecessary physical hardship in consistent with the
objectives of this ,ode; and
2`. That there are excepi,',nnal or extraordinary circuv— Lances
or conditions applicable <<, the property involved or the
intc.. ` d use of the property that do not generally apply
to other properties in the same zone; and
PLANNING CC'MMISSIO` ;TAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 13br2 - PULSAR
August 24, 1988
Page 6
3. That strict or literal Interpretation or enforcement of
the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of
pr Mleges enjoyea by the owners of other properties in
the
same zone; and
4. That the granting of the Variance wound not constitute of
I
special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of
other properties classified in the same zone; and
S. That the granting of the Variance w "1 not be detrimental
to the public health, safety or w6 fare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicf-4 ty.
8. Tentative Trace:
1. That the t•,ntative Tract is consistent with the General
Plan, Development Cu.e, and Specific plans; and
2. The de,isn or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and
Specific Plans; and
3. The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed; and
4. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to
humans and wildlife or the habitat; and
5. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public
health problems; and
6. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with
any easements acquired by the public at large, now of
rece-rd, fdr access through or use of the property within
the proposed subdivision.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE: The item has been advertised in the Daily Report
nc—w pdper as a public hearing, the site has been pose , an
notices were sent to all
property owners within 300 feet.
V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
consider all public input. After hearing all testimony,
the
Commission has the following options:
A. Approve Tentative Tract 13812 and Variance 88 -16 and issue a
Negative Declaration; or
Aft
PLANNING GOMMISSIC STAFF REPORT
TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 PULW
August 24, 1988
Page 7
B. Approve Tentative Tract 13812, isws,_a Negative Declaration,
deny Variance 88 -16 and add a condition: on the Tract Map that
the garage structure shall be relocated a),cf "F" Street shall be
shifted to provide the minimum lot depth of ,100 feet.
Res ly submy
B ^a L
City Pla er
BB:SM:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "Q" - Conceptual Master plan
Exhibit "C" - Subdivision K-
Exhibit "D" - Previous Subdlivisiop Map
Resolution of Approval for lariance 88 -16
Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 13886
�`r
CITY[ CITYOF ITB1: —4f jjZOZ
-rtTLF: �r.�✓,��nv
PLANNING DJX'b7M
SC ALE
J
G
'
/
!�
r
•
Y RES •
�i
• /
•
CITY[ CITYOF ITB1: —4f jjZOZ
-rtTLF: �r.�✓,��nv
PLANNING DJX'b7M
SC ALE
J
G
t �
Ak
- ;
I
• C/►74 ?
MA d nd i
r
t u �
i
CITY OF ITEM:
Pi,-k NI.VG L3f`'ISk7f`►,' '_
f -
F-
R
T
CITY OF ITEM:
RANCHO CL'C :A:1 jO.:c TiTt.E =*//w/S /dsri .tea
Pi.A.tiNi'tiG LL7IvISIUId` EtHiE3�T:
J rod — SCALE:
DI
CITY OF. rrF-Nl-
RANCHO CUC-\,N
,10
,NGA TITLE:
DWISM
3 EXHIPAT-t- --- SCALL---_
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13812,
A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 164 SIhrGLE FAMI3:Y LOTS ON
71.33 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECJF3C
PLAN
DWELLINGEUN TS RESIDENTIAL
ACRE) GENERAL TED WEST O
F AETIIWANDA
AVENUE, BETWEEN SUMMIT AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225.161 -35, 36, 37,
38, 49, 53, 55 AND 51, AND 225- 171 -01, 09, 10, AND 17
A. Recitals.
(i) Pulsar Development has filed an application for the apprcval
of Tentative Tract Map No. 13812 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map
regza.;t is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On the 24th of August, 1988, the Plac"kin;, Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed puniic hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that datr. After considering all
public testimony, the Planning Commission, approved said application.
(iii) On the 5th of October, 198-9= the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pu,,lic hearing to hear two appeals
on the application. Aftev concluding said hearing, the City Council referred
the item back to the Planning Commission for furthe^ review.
(iv) On the 9th of November, 1988, the Planning Condission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application 1 conclude 'said hearing on that dater
occurred. (v) All legal prerequisites to th3 adoption of this Resolution have
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the C:ty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
l This ta hereby finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above- referenced public hearing on November 9, 1988, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specificsily finds as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - PULSAR
November 9, 1988
Page 2
(a) The application applies to property located West
of Etiwanda Avenue, between Su►nmit and Highland
Avenues, with street frontages of 1,646 feet
along Summit Avenue and 559 feet along Highland
Avenue depth h t. property
is eloped with a single -family
residence; and
(b) Tile property to the north and east is vacant, and
is designated for residential uses. the property
to the South is vacant and is desi "nated for the
future Foothill Freeway. The property to the
west is vacant and developed with single family
residences and is designated for residential
uses; and
(c) The project, with the recommended conditions of
approval, complies with all minimum development
standards of the City of Rancho CucAlwnga; and
(d) The develo meat of 110 single family lots on the
western 31.47 acres of the site is consistent
with the Low Residential land use designation of
the General Plan; and
(e) T« development of 44 single family lots an the
easv.ern 27.86 acres of the site is consistent
with the Very Low Residential land use
designation of th�,General plan; and
ff) The proposal, with the recommended Conditions of
Approval, is in compliance with the Master Plan
of Traits and the obJectives of the Equestrian
Overlay District.
Based during the.ab ve- referenced public presented to
the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) Treat tentative tract is consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code, and Specifir
Plans; and
(b) The design or improvcisnents of the tentative tract
is co«:ist;nt with the General Plan, Development
Cade, ani ', —ific Plans; and
(c) The site 'ally suitable for the type of
developme;- as;+d; and
PLANNING comrSSiON RESOLUTION N0.
TENTATIVE TRArT 13812 - PULSAR ?
November 9, 1988
Page 3
(d) The design of the subdivision is -lot 'likely to
cause systantial environmental damage and
avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their
habitat; and
(e) fie tentative tract is not likely to cause
serious public health problems, and
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not
conflict with any easement acquired by the public
at large, r.ow of record, for access through or
use of the property, xithin the proposed
subdivision.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies than: the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with tha CIlifora�a Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and,. further, this Co.Wission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and Conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby ,i.)roves the, application subject to
each and evens condition set fort's bel-. , and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
A. Tentative Tract
1. - Undergrourding of Existing Overhead Utilities
A. The existing overhead � ?tiiities
(telecommunications and electrical) in the
project side of Highland Avenue shall be
undergreunded from the first pole cff -site east
of the xast project boundary to the first pole
riff -site west of the west project boundary. The
developer may request a reimbursement agre€merat
to recover one -half the City adopted cost for
undergrounding from future development
'(redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side
of Highland Avenue.
B. An in -11pu fee er contribution to the future
undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities
(telecommunications and electrical) along tike
west project boundary shall be paid to the City
prior to recordation oc' the Final Map,. The fee
shall be one -half the City adopted unit am.c;nt
times the length from the southwest corner o tot
144 to the southeast corner of the intersectior
of Streets "C" and "G" (0et feet).
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - PULSAR
November 9,
1588
Page 4
C. The existing overhead utilities
(telecommunications and electrical) to the
existing house on proposed lot 104 shall be
removed from lot ..34 to the first pole south of
"C" Street upon installation of underground
utilities on -site to serve lot 104.
2.
Summit Avenue shall be constructed full width, excluding
off -site parkway Improvements, from the intersection with
" °M" Street easterly to the intersection with Stiwanda
Avenue, with Phase I development. The developer may
request reimbursement agreements to recover the costs of
off -site improvements frw future development.
3.
Two means of access shall be provided to each phase of the
development. Both shall be public; streets constructed
full width curb -to -curb.
4.
Perimeter streets which are located on -site shall be
constructed full width curb -to-curb. Parkway improvements
fronting "not a part" properties on "L " and "GH St °eets
may be deferred until development of those properties.
Parkway improvements shall be constructed on both sides of
"C" Street.
5.
`
In -lieu fees for the future co-ostruction of frontage
streets which are not currently needed shall b^ paid to
i
the City prier, to approval of the Final' Map as follows;
a. The south one -:half of Summit Avenue west of I'M"
Street to the centerline of the Southern
California Edison right -of -way, including
k
landscaping around the Cucamonga County Waiter
District pump station; and
`
b. The north one -half of C Street west of the west
project boundary to the centerline of the
Southern California Edison right -of -Way.
6.
Temporary access across the future Route 30 Freeway right-
of-Way will be allowed as follows:
a. "L" Street between, "E" Street and Highland Avenue
shall be constructed 28 feet wide with concrete
curbs only (no gutters). The curb returns at IT'
Street shall have 15 foot radii. 'There shall be
no sidewalk south of "E " Street; and
I
PLANNING CCMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
TENTATIVE TRACT IS812 - PULSAR,
November 9, 1988
Page 5
b. Tttz intersection of "t," Street and Highland
Avenue rhall be upgraded to provide right and
left turn lanes for both the north and south
movements. Transition tapers on Highland Avenue
shall be designed for a 55 mph design speed. The
pavement for the turning lanes shall be provided
without disturbing the existing improvements on
the south side of Highland Avenue, and
c. A fee for the future removal of the temporary
access road and the transition tapers on Highland
Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to
approval of the :inal Map.
7. Tara portion of site west of "f';" and "L" Streets is
subject to fioodi+g from Day Creek Channel. Therefore,
final plans will not be accepted for review and no permits
(improvements, building, grading, etc.) will be issued
until Phase IY of the Dad Creek Channel is sufficiently
completed to provide necessary flood protectiob as
approved by the City Engineer.
8. Interim drainage protection facilities shall be provided
along tF- north project boundary. The design rhall be
Justified by the final drainage study and a;- ,)roved by the
City Engineer, A iaintenance Agreement shall be executed
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance of the drainage
protection facility but providing the City with the right
of access to maintain the facility if private maintenance
is insufficient, and allowing the City to assess those
costs to the developer.
9. The main storm drain line within "N" and "L " Streets shall
be sized for a Q100. The pipe shall be extendV southerly
and westerly within a street or public easement to the
existing inlet on the north side of Highland Avenue.
10. The design of storm drainage facilities for the portion of
the site east of "M" and `L" Streets shall be coordinated
with the developer of the adjacent property to the east.
Pipeline crossings of the future Poute 30 Freeway shall be
held to a rainimum.
ii. Construct the portion of i~�F City Master Plan Storm Drain
i located within Summit Avenue as justified by the final
drainage study and approved by the City Engineer.
Standard drainage f- , 'or the site shall be credited to
the cost of the facility and the developer shall' be
eligible for reimbursemeht of costs in excess of the fees
in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75.
l
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLf1TION N0.
TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - PULSAR
November 9, 1988
Page 6
12. Written verification shall be obtained from Caltrans that
sufficient freeway right -of -way has been provided prior to
,
j
approval of the Final Mdp.
13. The developer shall make a good faith effort to a`q °ire
the required off -site property interests necessary to
construct the required street improvements for Summit
Avenue. If he should Fail to do sot the developer shall,
at least 120 days prior to submittal of the Final Map for
approval, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at
such time as the city acquires the property interests
required for the improvements. Such agreement shall'
provide for payment by thG developer of all costs incurred
by the City to acquire the off -site property interests
required in connection with the subdivision. Security for
a portion of these costs shall be in the form, of a cash
deposit in the amount givan in an appraisal report
obtained by the developer at the developer's expense. The
appraiser shall be approved by the City pridr to
comm,encemen -c of the appraisal.
14.. The easement for ingress and egrmss and n:.tintenance of
public utilities along the western portion of the site
shall be quit claimed prior to approval of the Final Map.
15: Local equestrian trail easements shall be provided on the
Final Map as follows:
a.. The trail easement and property line between lots
9, 17 and 18 shall be shifted to the west to line
up with the northwest corner of "C" and "0"
streets.
b. A 15 foot wide trail on the south side of lots
19, 20 and 23.
c. A 15 foot wide trail on the south side of lot 13.
d. A 15 foot wide trail on the west side of lot 1.
This trail shall be shifted to the west tract
boundary upon removal of the access road to
Highland Avenue.
e. A 15 foot wide; trail along the south tract
boundary.
f. a 10 foot wide trail along the east tract
boundary.
MW
r
fi
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ND,
TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 PULSAR
November 9, 1988
Page 7
16. Heavy broom finish concrete crossing shall be proviurd
where trails cross public streets. The crossing shall be
sr,�Dwn on the street improvement plans and shall be
s ?proved by the City Engineer and City Planner prior to
approval of the Final Map.
17. The final " ,trading Plan s�.-jll be reviewed and approved by
the iradi .;'Committee prior to approval of the Final Map.
18. The developer shall cwAence, participate in and
consummate, or cause to be commenced, participated in, or
cansurtmated a Mello -Roos. Community Facilities District
iCFD) for the Foothill Fire Protection District to finance
a fire station to serve the envelopment, including
facilities, equipment and operations, and maintenance.
The station shall be located, designed, and built to all
specifications of the Foothill Fire Protection District,
and shall become the District's property upon
completion. The equipment shall be selected by the
District in accordance with its needs. In any building of
the station, the developer shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. The Co shall be farmed
ASK by the District and the developer by the time of
recordation of the final map.
B. Design Review
1, A sound wall, as required by the acoustical analysis,
shall be installed along the south tract boundary. The
final design of the wall shall be reviewed and approved by
the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of building
permits.
2. A final acoustical dnalysis shall be required to identify
necessary mitigation measures to reduce the noise levels
within the residences below 45 CNEL. The report shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Planer prior to the
issuance of building permits.
3. A decorative perimeter block wall shall be required around
the western portion of the tract (Low Residential), along
Summit'Avenue, along both sides of "C" Street, and along all corner side yard areas. The design and location of
the wall shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
i
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
TENTATIVE TRACT 13812 - PULSAR'
November 9, 1988
Page 8
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONG!,'
BY:
Larry -=
c �e airman
ATTEST;
Brad u er, cre airy
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of :rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty, and
regulaKy introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on ttse 9th day of November, 1988, by the foilowing,,vote -to -wit;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSI NER,:
ABSENT: UMMISSIONERS:
P
L;'
9
O? IglnaA Poor Quatty
gOrWi °'c "'gym w�. RTy4u.
.,'ny yv�A4R Uyy MMYL� 4'p 40ORL �y 0.6CiCCiA
4wSUV3L�Y �+yyyLry 4V� Lw�e� Oq� "�'H`q,C g4L?U?i�
gN�N�tt 8lt�i 4i3 y,q49 C K� d OV L6
»�4� }4Y ab '�pxtl�4 �� CnpY ^yam �y�� uud ^q y�LrL CCq�/
+} VY4y QY N. Y. � aV� 'L l.NA> CWY QxY
YM
.9a
aMr�YYOw 4NV
y
��y1 �i.:ppYL..��iopa i yY. .� ,aa33ggu Lw.� q•-::a +n e� »�o
`4NL.YN_u �p.up RCVy GC� AN N�q, qtq
�$,aYq »�ipy� 9 Chi' NN q .Y 1i C�+Nt'q
un
I�rPUn.,..i
IRS
�4yy
c a+ L a
�AL
wlpa2a }.tj Iy NL a «. $�. q °+i..ae
uuL�L ®�YVNYr..A a. YWYji: i.yY�n.w •"�Y ttY >Y`nG,
a Vy g4kNa.Qiw O {{113 YCyan �iB Y� pa�6s. sM ►rr�q
GQ �IfiVM CMa �i22 Mi�3ray
i
M i
1 i
.4.t
s y
a
E
C•�
49
I
r
�
UA Z
Ld'Hp!p
� c
L
$
M
JSN
rte.
gq91
Qr
CCY
Yy�
b
w'
CM
Y.ra
}?+
M
w
tl
�r
a
u
_
F
�ppq
��
'•'!�
N
fR
r'
ISf
49
I
r
t
43
�i
d
04diubt Poor Qualls!
Ca O
O y
rp C4
O^ O +^ N V C O M M G
ad
G N '.
O yy h ail. = C
-0 0 C
^ = 1L- O g
e ®Q ^; ZVL�1�„ LS
7 O C� wa°i V� Y ^VMM #MX
S+'os 3Cfii.a"'
1Y a gYb.C+ - NQtl•�N4N
c�°�' +V•a�.Ci. VO� y Ow &s8
QI M iqw�.• �Y
ti
«n�a
� N
°N
a o ui
C V
gvi
G
O
.S
O+ u D
L V
GV 01
yw
Ate'
`N�
V
a
N O w
a 3
6�
LL_LGY
C
!J 3
V
Z~w
4
^pe
7�
Y
w0.
$.0
3�r
X �
=
L
is
y
Y
NQ V
ar
q
6
^_ _.
L`y007
`iyS
Yt O
L.e
S8=
Rt
TRU
NV
�S o
wa+ON
yL
VQA
p
aq�
N L
^Y.
M L
Tip
LC
ZZ
yCS.SY~
L. YC
yob
yea
w�'N
y) C C In
OC
u 0
.w
sg4ss
§t
-1
12
Yw�
��pu
bA
O�
^OOH it
N�QV
pN� �yVO
YL
t.22
14=3
N�
hj�
VV-'s
x :83
,V'�
VC~
IN
�•�
O V it *QK
yy�1� V 6
U�V�N
� N QNCC� ux
�CVY3LLY
�OQypU
yuN1�� V�N�d
Li�V�•IO'
4 C A 010
m w� ^si
N �
O # ^�G
erJ ^awo
M
V V 6M� y
11
M.
11
L Y O N
y
v
C
-2 +
N��
Yy
�G�tV
N��•���O «14
Y
w0.
C
_Y
Gd
0.$�rrMO
O^
Y
NQ V
ar
q
6
^_ _.
L`y007
`iyS
Yt O
L.e
!*
C GGii
c c
yY� ++
N L
O N
` g l
L O V
y.
-S
Z
H
-1
12
Yw�
��pu
bA
O�
^OOH it
N�QV
pN� �yVO
YL
V. CJO
LL
^ ^O
rte $
uA9
w` O
oe
��
7W�
i=u� «qq u:.2
yC�M.
`= e5
N.�V
L
OM••�j�•W4i
°N
Oq
+1w4N
V=
9Cy
b40N
wf W
���
tB O./
�f L6�
��L}
L�`Q
VVwM is�p
V V +�
V °�U
�vyY3
�•
N�y*
N a 4
O° q�
OI G N
�9
iNN
e�.ya4
' O°YV
V`g L
g ®v`0O4
aL7
N
b y °
rV °d
Y
^�L�'
s
w
aNY ±M'XVC
!°N■yS
` C
O
Z—
-L ea
O
°
jui
e
s
VY
'. $Y+«A~1�� yi
+{
M«_ .
-OO Yy
q '"
v >NyyM�wiyy
��LO
. 8 5 7
�440O'G
C V
!p y V C.0 P• A� C
^? C�
q w ib O NN
V °p
�C-y 010
pV �
CNg�11
Ly. >
ruu
0O/ti y�y
KH 6C.°
^ 4
A•�.NQ
<r Nii
47.9 .
iV
�p �'V G^C� ■LG
Ja-3t A�Nww
_ tY1y^4� Vj y1
P`��VI
�j
O V it *QK
yy�1� V 6
U�V�N
� N QNCC� ux
�CVY3LLY
�OQypU
yuN1�� V�N�d
Li�V�•IO'
4 C A 010
m w� ^si
N �
O # ^�G
erJ ^awo
M
V V 6M� y
11
M.
11
oinal poor o t�y
Y U..Y L pL yy CC' C .! Siva
V.L �j V C o00+... Y/Y LY.y k•
O i0
Y Y
r
m R. Y p• N A A C C Y Y
le
i era°�
+uy !4N$$ei °�.'`!y
o.�.w }ig� C -V w�aY '.L S�n.A
W »vcY �u� Is
t ■a � r# L v a {6� c a
^O�' 16t1 yam. 'NIt Q'y^'NOgt Tyy' Cy NCM pW ^y.
d7SY N��I �Yt40 �p9 C;. -- Yt "'_rC4 »�C+.L' _G VA ROYY
LM° «a 1dg L W ^N 6�qNS.dNQ.�PM �u�tN L1��
0
3-3 7 N .22 L 9 ar o y h Y a.Yt r'
c�4i Yp�rS 'rsv Yq6 °w �« Nc�ty 4y�g: aLeta a
YNr.�vynui ^4w c'a�� sue. � N
+ '+rMM Q 4p Y 2,
LbpO Yp6.yp:N QsY DpG 3. dbV��
; 2 R r w.. ■f�4f�u[1i F, RMN 8 4 .. 4' ~L
g$� oqp' QuYt .9a"a. �h a +Q" «L : 9y w"If
` ^N' �p rc'.jy u`Y.- as mot. mss, '�',�
•- 'o$L$N L+.0 a: ,c ;tt ° � ' i•-��i °r.
ey
til�NRw. !r^ <N +a rwc' !N «.- wN�i"rnpNWy R .- ��%aq�i
4u tt. Rtx, N
.i
gs
Y■
q ^ N
R p°
C
� YG
4g� c • Y� A �� qu w � v V oR i� s� auO +vt �+
e.TL tca i�+n aka nv
Rtti� Gpbyr� � '�~ LU m oa;i uaYiSC or a4 w ra`¢�=$�
N NLLY �rtl rte. 'i �S VY
5-3 o N $w
ie N �� N� � �.� N OA � i� d� Y R 4 ^_ ^■ V S r+ ..
Y�Q GVN
^f 0 t O V
S �MLVL
V Y o 6 Y��
ate.° `�ti::$ � oM qrr _N t°: $a ^° °_'"'� L«p'LQ
�yq R4�y�t «C R Q.c _Y CV�R N^ RCYysG atiN 3sCG�s{
G'� M `w "�M � RY L ~4 M a A bCYOpL � �A3�t N ^p^ � U �].•
LpC �l�.a eq�. Qt N.�R V 0>•3~ ONiO VY^NV LdCNNR:�tr.
yR� 7w^iMw yy �� at O�1r qO ++N �rV NwCO l`.J a6L t��r{tPY Np Oprf N
pd°
O Mme^ OV++ff 01 7 Lll +n N{°y�V i Y ^1 Gfl�y L�R^ �.N YO�MAV
l�pRw^ Q.H.. LVN *N C
• � : .am
1=6 i a
i.
1Sn°: $59t «w °O
e
C4
ti
ri
t
at 00 or
Ya p A� cec llf.. u4 LYQ
=dH s4 rSg c. �.is «°
■D Y O q �p{$ C� �^ O Y y �� ^ u�i
uLQ C~ � Vp: LL e-IYC VgtjpV V ■u ulG0. C �tx
jCjy..O�'. �`^M tt C�O� CN Mf�C 'VOO't9i w OM
�♦wlep 66-•V y°`j`� Yq d��V V,yryt dy CgpgN �a ■}! O yaYys
CNODLp.11 �w� � O��M. �H -•�^ wN♦�} ^}�� C pN
4�C V1e� CYtjYa CN6�
° O
g-111 v
p$p$.�
4aO ar�iy aueuM 'f'iyV .gp x"+ai�
yw N LS 0003111 Of 4 N, j GGG�
,E M V�
y y
u N N{~ w ^° w° N$ LY ■ Ya1 Y O Y/ p 9 T��1 Cw
Rp�,1 VO.^ YV~ ML� Y4pw �'r �36 k �N
i1 V p��.. �y:1 �' r � ai
Yp6 M _N aYi �.
HIP ��L I�.i C 6�L+ ;NtSiST���
L �O1 py L V gay }. L {- ` 9
Ypp1pV Hug
V��QQSS �C �V.► M `Wr^n
y Vri1L 6:]u41 �"wY.0 N N O•Va
N 1p
332! w .`. � .L°. � .n..� rt 'tt^ +�.Y..$ '° ' 4 s
OI N C B yy V Y y Nit L� Cgg w
`ay+L- S �pC ♦4 Y at' mp at « O Yak
YNIt Y ' q • 4 C Z ` � Y d Y per. �. G y 4 y.N Y
pp 1ay1 1� • Q O1A O MCC '� C. NN } ,01 w �I °9 C�
O Y O Q. Y Y LrY 1Y. y. V Y Y r.F.. 12 9 '9 C q' C M. Y
L�
^U w Oytwa�'l.. TL w
s Y i N C i a N A C c E Q O C C
IS
46Cf ?4 Z C 'NY U ~e4
C< ypS c9 Y 4y C .
y `l Y�� Mfig ��' �
Y yy
L� V ° >�
Y �Qy L 01 ' NGV
L
Or 1O6C
L ii9.•� j C b! CM ^pY ^lYiC dY R� VAC �A� `'
aV.. S�1�`► N `. Cl� O.w � N N�� ,VY {O��'
cO Odd. n Y OI' ..L.tivp� ^' N�$V� �� C�p �Qi NXCI ONa1�4
Lt i'y
VNV �. O,QO Q 9AytlyR0
,�W FccY� Nw ,Vp N YNC� G Y N �Y i NK . rW C 5Y [^�N44 L L� LJV A LyOOt� 1 H+wfC.MLY `Op Y . < � . aNC • spL•. ��G',YO� .°. OG1L �OY7M�0 pp C �c/1 � t�1a. vO �. G p
-
- . E I
VIR
is al 1 1
M1pi O Q O YyA M a L i O Y ■ _$qy Y Q r ' $l
N Y Y
B AsH4cN2 YY Y. ."SO
Yp°sw.A
�AS OFC�yy� Vpy p YYAYI�
Va
N q Y61� 11"♦' 4 Ypp MAR. C�DMp Va N,fC
a♦"�p �Cb
i w'I�iy °7F
�� w� Bri ViLl 6L Lf dig4q�IN Y i0i i N4y� 11Y.ia.
Mn �O��.
0 .MN �6' qqw,',ypp�O j O
Y� 4 �a
L 1 --till
5� 4+Y LC L� w taC >il aim �r3 -a "R
bb4 y ■ � °10 � L
SLµ 0, m0 O TY��y ■{ q ° (�N {y4}N b11
Eli Y C rs Y V qq� y
FaD
'age wu'O 3o s5ai <Sp a�ad+e °v <31s`i ji ti,w. 4 `3u .. a o iao� ai
ro
N Iti f _ yj 10
0
1
1
Original Poor QuatlW
N L
y
voac
ggiib�ee
Io.
$' ♦
v
(E!E!
a�0
Y.0 Y.OiQ
N0
LM
OIw� �
p
ti
�
w�Y=
N
41
�L'i
Y
yNSN+a
w. s
gs
°wrro
a�
uj
:.g OaLG
Y�t I
Lu
:f
M.0
i! a
V601 11-
A V,
.p °yu
C
O
Nf
1
z"k
bCO a
4i4 T.Yf
.
p
t
�IIY. 1t[
A
w
SLL&'
o w
1F
N .`i.
QGYR
sN
N'a
°w
MF!
_� »pOY��
y{W
C»
Op
WVp�
L
�
L
V�UV ON�tp�
�V
L a M'
°
�
L i9j
��qgr
p 1
J
9f
Y�
y
R^
4qNq
�r
yw�I
qyL
+ N
M
- . E I
VIR
is al 1 1
M1pi O Q O YyA M a L i O Y ■ _$qy Y Q r ' $l
N Y Y
B AsH4cN2 YY Y. ."SO
Yp°sw.A
�AS OFC�yy� Vpy p YYAYI�
Va
N q Y61� 11"♦' 4 Ypp MAR. C�DMp Va N,fC
a♦"�p �Cb
i w'I�iy °7F
�� w� Bri ViLl 6L Lf dig4q�IN Y i0i i N4y� 11Y.ia.
Mn �O��.
0 .MN �6' qqw,',ypp�O j O
Y� 4 �a
L 1 --till
5� 4+Y LC L� w taC >il aim �r3 -a "R
bb4 y ■ � °10 � L
SLµ 0, m0 O TY��y ■{ q ° (�N {y4}N b11
Eli Y C rs Y V qq� y
FaD
'age wu'O 3o s5ai <Sp a�ad+e °v <31s`i ji ti,w. 4 `3u .. a o iao� ai
ro
N Iti f _ yj 10
0
1
1
o M. -15
fnaw ^o0 LW CC.L D n YM N.GO S o C Cz� 'LO
NY w N�^ CL. CY UY 2 Q o ¢pY Yy�.
� ric�Lf 'LL� ��= Y ' itri« '^ �. ja` Uw
=i _42 y 6M a �' 01 If p.= Y A CY O A� }. 21.y
Y "1 N Y O g
uie ZS iFV IS M j• L y0� � .L =M
Z A a a eC p`+p� '� Z �L'�
a Y C Q p L O fr CCL YCC. p {�
CO�� �� 9=8a �. 4V yYY^Y
a....� C V, I. y
s N y ps c uS Sit LC S ^� w i " O1 2+
�M{t4�[.Y ■'O p M�u`O�CNc CN YY Y W PLQ
CLiNY f:.l ti w0 �Pr�.O ���SSS �. s6
-2:5 LO X,
N a� S
��nY ego c t'a isYY� C.Y
Y}.. �4
z vie `a
L L
o�� � . a,YN, �wo� 9'
8 gg�� `Epp' ` be. 2
ryu.�
E= 'L't3. N2. °uY O$� . s _ yea �Y
MY y +4Ya c� cu ^$i^ "'S rg s �+ Yari_ii� +xL
�yn. y��yy + {yYy�
L- Y Y L L ` 0 ttY n. YN N L My , ^t N Y' x s
J-
¢y t
Y 1 C L . V+ b 5.5 t H
L Y pp C L N 4 N« O 6 C 1..
$$ . v u$ nil
'`.�`, v "Y'n eii % � Va o¢a ro•NN•�u ago
. g E $ gEeI
V 43.1 -HIE C N
c 2C� as Y.= E 1� 'i'�a 'y>`wcw Qy.
C a w ^ti ya 6V� O.
pp Cb
941 ^�Y
�A
--i INr tfin g�
�pyOM `Ow �.e r, YwEv $iYN Y M^ 7YiL
N T 5C n M M Y` YYy 4° N�� DDG Yay CY I y :=. P a yL
vY L C e C u, y^c' UO C �L ryVry �� �wwJ� pVp $1
y' y o eeN > =Y± N /sA \` L W Y Y C Yy 6L1 L.
K�C W� E V w �S L1r V.�•. y.tw e L
NL/ A E.5 w.-
ai d
0
�4
L�
4!
Ax
L
ws�
!Z
q
yy
L
i.yi
a
= L
w C
w�
c a
OLV
Y�Yp
Y O b
11111 ±�'
611
0.N L
;yyG
+t
vtiQ
S O 1
N q
C
O CgCaTi
� 820!
>y
o �1M °yyy +111
G� 11.Y_?�yv
M.
�S
Sp
C3
1G+
~
64
'�
ifV
dyrY, qL CQO
4V ►VVO
!lNff�ia
���
,M
�
tV�yVN
i. 41 ��
�{�yy
a LG
'L�
�
�
Y(1�
C,y1
�p
LMO
ap4
}c�M.LN
1"pAwg
AY 'z�
rrZ
N
.QOy
w C1
+�YV yyG
V`C
9�1r
VN
'C
Gb \
Vy4L�y
N .b
ge
x
q
�'n
GL wGNG.
�
^
~w„
tl
�L
k
w
u
Y
LL
py
Eby
V1Q1
Q~
=C 4PY»
p.. wcwv
\
s� 4.�
'r
��..ba
�cwil
P�
!Cf
.4 :-
M.b
■a
ws
eY
w�
�'LOa.. i.A�G
YMq
C
w
N
L
C4 b
p
G
2
Vqw
t4 �WaR
ku�
Yti
L4yyV!
»WS�
C
1�
■�
�~
w�a
Mya
wt
1"�i{
jar 4i
<N M
� dpG M
��
{Xy3r
�.�
-as
1
9.
ti
y B f
4
sk
d JH
i:Glir
+R.R
cd
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA &,' NGA
STAFF EEPOFT
DPsE: November 9. 2988 �.
ro: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM; Brad Buller, Ci*,4 Planner
BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner
SUBJFCT: EW7RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEWLOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
amen n u e
Chapter o e anc o Cucamonga Municipal Code
permitting the use of ort» street parking for model home
sales offices meeting certain criteria.
BACKGROUND: On October 25, 2988, the Planning Commission directed
Staff I reaise a proposed Development Code A"nraaent regarding the
use of on- street parking at modal tome sales offices. The
Commission directed staff to address the followipg issues:
I.. Landscaping within the cul -de -sac street drd off - street
overflow parking area,
2. Location of the models in ret•+ion to adjacent 'omen;
3. The provision of decorative fencing to secure the street at
night; and
4. Location Of the off - street overflow parking area.
Based, on the Commission's direction outlined abovo, staff wou',d
recommend that Sections 17.04.07OG7(f) and (g) be revised to read
as follows (changes are shown in hold):
Section I7.04.07007
lTT_�'i:ree�p'rovements and temporary parking at a rate of two
(2) spaces per model shad be completed to the
satisfaction of the :city Engineer and City planner prior
to commencement of sales activities or the display of
rnN±0 homes. The parking spaces shall be located within .
an Off-street facility, except on- street parking my be
peraitted subject to the follfting condition;
ti) The sales t.ffice, models, and on- street parking spaces
shall be hated at the end of a cul -de -sac street and
coordinated with construction phasing such that there are
no resident homeowners on the street who have street
PLANNING COMMASSION'STAFF REPORT
DCA 88 -07 - C'TY OF RANCHO CUCJh6NGA
November 9, 1988
Page 2
E
parking spacer, in front of their homes striped for use by
model home safes office visitors.
(2) The parking stalls shall ;e adequately striped and shall
conform to City standards.
(3) The model home sales office, includina on- street parking,
shall be secured with d decorative `,.-ce and gate across
the street _at is kepi' locked auring non- operating
business hours.
(4) An area for overflow parking shall be provided off - street
Planner. sSaidf parF ng area shallitbE located d adja entito
the model home r,? -•s offico, outside the secured area,
appropriately signed, and provided aita a drive approach
constructed to City standards.
(5) Parking sha11 be permitted only within and on the project
ortprivat )i shall along f adjacent
ed to satisfy the model home
sales parking rer irement.
(6) Temporary landscaping, including minimum 48 inch box
trees, shall be provided within the on- street parking area
(cul -de -sac. Temporary landscaping shall also be
provided within a planter area surrounding the overflow
parking area.
(g) All fences proposed in conjunction with the model homes
and sales offic, shall be located outside of -the public
right -of -way, rffzept where approved bar the City Planner
and City Engineer for security.
The City Planner and City Engineer may also impose other conditions as
necessary to ensure traffic safety and circulation, security, and
neighborhood compatibility.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff has completed the enclosed initial
Study anU_Re—nTTfTeT no adverse environmental impacts which could
result from this Amendment. Therefore, the issuance of a Negative
Declaration is recommended.
III. REC"iNDATION: The Commission should conduct a public herring and
consider public comments. Adoption of the attached Resolution
recommending approval of the Development Code Amendment to the City
council is recommended.
&_�'_L
PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPC'RT �.
OCA 88 -07 - CITY OF RANCHO, CUCAMI)I
November 9, 1983
Page 3
f�
QResful ly itt
* ne
BB:AH:ml
Attactents: Staff Report of October 26, 1988
Resolution of Approval
Draft Ordinance
K]
j
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAPF REPORT
DATE: OctobE 26, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, r ty Planner
BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMLNT
EIYY-"G�AAM6� amen en o e
ap er o e ana o Cucamonga Municipal Code
permitting the use of on- street parking for model home
sales offices meeting certain criteria.
I. BACKGROUND: On September 28, 1988, the Planning Commission
dire- a staff to prepare a Development Code ,- wadment which would
permit the use of on- street parking at model come sales offices.
The request for the amendment stemmed from a Variance application
which was filed by a developer proposing to use on- street parking
on a cul -de -sac to satisfy the requirement of two parking spaces
per model home. The Commission could not 1eake the necessary
findings to grant the Variance but concluded that in certain
situations, on- street parking -ould be acceptable for model home
sales offices. The Commission .:oncluded that the Development Code
should be amended.
II. ANALYSIS: The Commission recommended establishing the fallowing
r(qu7r� �ements for use of on- street parking at model hwe sales
offices:
1. A cul -de -sac location. Throuah street and stub
street locations were not deemed acceptable because
Of potential conflicts between parking movements and
through traffic.
2. Appropriate striping of parking stalls to conform to
City standards.
3. Provision of a parking ovdrflow area should a buyer
camp -out situatiaa exist.
4. )there appropriate, security fencing may be required.
A
kG i
`� u..
PLANNING C" issr0N STAFF REPORT
0VA 88 -07 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 26, 1988
Page 2
In order to permit the use of off - street parking,, Aevelopment Code
Section 17.04.07OC7(f) and (g) must be revised. Based on the
Commission's direction, staff would recommend that these sections
be revised to read as follows (changes are shown in bold);
Section 17.04,07007
(f) Street improvements and temporary parking at a rate of two
(2) spaces per model shall La completed to tha
satisfcction of the City Engineer and City Planner prior
to commencement of sales ,tivities or the display of
model domes. 'the parking spaces shall be located within
an off- street facility, except on- street parking may be
peruitted subject to tie following conditions:
(1) lief: sales office, aodels, and on- street parking
spaces shall be located on a cul-de -sac street.
(2) The parking stalls shall be adequately striped
and shall conform to City standards.'
(3) An area for excess parking shall be provided
off - street to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Planner.
(4) Parking shall bp, permitted only within and on
the project site. Parking along adjacent or
Perimeter streets (public or private) shall not
be- used to satisfy the model hose sales parking
requirement.
(g) Al fences proposed in conjunction with the model homes
and sales office shall be located outside of the nublic
rig[A -of way, except where approved by tNe City planner
and City Engineer for security.
The City Planner and City Engineer may also impose other conditions
as necessary to ensure such things as traffic safety and
circulation, security, and neighborhood compatibility.
Of major concern to the Commission is the compatibility of the
sales office with the surrounding homes. Ideally, the models
should be located in an area designated as the last phase or phases
of development, thu, eliminating a situation in which homebuykrs
are parking in front of a new reside'nt's home. Through the
Temporary Use Permit process, the City Planner verifies that the
models are properly sited.
C r
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
OCA 88-07 - �ZITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA
October 26,1988
Page 3
II. ENVIROWZ','!TAL REVIEW: Staff has compl�ted the enclosed Initial
Study and identifieif no adverse environmental impacts which could
result from this Amendment. Therefore, the issuance of a Negative
Declaration is recommended.
III. REC"ENDATION:�' The Commission should conduct a public hearing and
consideF—p-uMc comments. Adoption of the-attached Resolution
recommending approval of the Development Code Amendment to the City
Council is recommended.
fu I I y j sy. b WIV� �t ed ,
AResa
);)anner
Bra 13 e
ity
C I
BB:BH:te
Attachments: Initial Study, Part 11
Alf,
Resolution of Approval
Draft Ordinance
RESOLUTI07 NO.
st A RESOLUTION OF' THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
AN 17, TCAMONGAMUN CIPA CODE PERMITTING THE USE OF T14E RANCHO
OFF ON- STREET
PARKING FOR MODEL HOME SALES OFFICES MEETING CERTAIN
CRITERIA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
WHEREAS, on the 26th day of October, 1988, the Planning
Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section
65864 of tho California C-overnment code and continued said public
hearing to November 9, 1988.
found tha
SECTION �s`amendment will otcreate as significant Sadverse
effect on the environment and recommends to City Council the
issuance of a Negative Delaratior. on November 9, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED.
1. That pursuant to Section 656-'0 to 65855 of the
California Government code, that the Planning
Commissic-A of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval of this amendment.
Amk sp 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve this amendment to the
Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988..
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITf OF RANCHO CUCAMO.,A
BY:
ATTEST:
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Co,ission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted
by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of
November, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONEP;S
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS
Gr-
ORDINANCE no.
AN ORDIRLWE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.04,
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERMITTING THE
USE OF ON- STREET PARKING FOR MODEL HOMES SALES OFFICES
MEETING CERTAIN CRITERIA
i
§i:iEREAS, on the tih day of 1988, the City Council held e
duty notice(' public hearing pursuant W- Sic`tion 55864 of the California
Goverm. ent Core.
E The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
t
follows:
f SECTION I: Sectioa 17.04.070, subsection tff of .Chapter 17.04 is
amended to read as -follows:
(f) Street improvemerkts and temporary
spaces per model shall be completed ato�th a sa satisfaction tiontof the
City Engineer and City Planner prior to commencement of sales
activities or the 4fisp13,v of model homes, The ;parking spacr:
shall be located within at off4treet facility, except on-
stmt parking My be pemittted subject to the following
conditions:
(1) the sales office, models, and or- street parking spaces
shall be located at ther end of a cul -de -sac street and
coordinated with construction phasing such that there are
no resident homeowne� s on the - street who have street
parking spaces In froW., -)f their homes striped for use by
model home sales office visitors,
(2) The parking stalls shali_be adequately striped and shall
conform to City standards.
(3) The model home sales: Office, including on- street parking,
shall be secured with a decorative fence and gate across
the street that is kept looked during non - operating
business hours,
(4) An area for overflow parking shall be provided off - street
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and city
Planner. Said parking area shall be located adjacent to
the model home sale: office, outside the secured area,
appropriately signed, and provided with a drive approach
constructed to City standards.
(8) Parking shall be pe,"itted only within and on the project
site. Parking along adjacent or perimeter streets (public
or private) shall nt be used to satisfy the model home
sales parking requirement..
I
ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 88 -07
Page 2
C "
(6) Temporary landscaping, including minium 48 inch box
trees, shall be provided within the on- street parking area
(cul -de -sac). Temporary landscaping shall also be
provided within
parking area.., a planter area surrounding the overflow
L
fol l acs SECYION ,: Seciton 27.04.070, subsecr ion (g) is amended to read as
g) All fences proposed In conjunction with the model homes and
sales off"ce shall be located outside of the public right-of-
way, except where approved by the City Planner and City
Engineer far-_, ,securifiy.
SECT %%)N 3: This Council finds that this amendment will not adversely a ec a environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration.
1p
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: November 9, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Steven Hayes, Assistant Planer
SUBJECT: MO011FiCATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -01 - SAN ANTONIO
e deved o ment or a me ca cen er
cons sting o a , ,938 square foot ambulatory health care
facility and 82,932 square feet of medical offices on to
acres of land in the Mixed Use (MHO) District within the
Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the southeast
corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street - APH 227 -151-
1,3 and 14.
I, PROJECT AND. SITE DESCRIPTION:
R. actxon Requested. - -- proval of -evisions to the previously
approved6n"-iiding elevations of the ambulatory care building
and changes in sidewalk treatment.
$, Surroundin Land Use and Zanin
South - Vacant Land, Mixed (MHO) District within the
Terra Vista Community Plan
East - Vacant Land; Mixed Use JMHO) District within the
West -
Terra cnt Vista ,�M xed Use (WC) District within the
Terra Vista Community Plan
C. General Plan Desi nations:
roject Siiee uI "m "t si`dentiat (8-14 dweiling units per
acre)
North - Low-Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre)
South - Medium Residential (8-Y14 dwelling units per acre)
West - Medium Residential (8 -14 welling Units per acre)
D. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant i ', a
na V rce`nt -sTbpe from north to south. The ext,
Eucalyptus row near the west site boundary has previously 1,
approved for removal in connection with the construction o,
Milliken Avenue betw~en Mountain View Drive and Foothill
Boulevard. No other significant plants or animals exist on the
site.
PLANNING COMMISSION STUFF REPORT
OR 8841 — SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
November 9, 1958
Page
E. harking Calculations:
We Square r,.rkino
of Use Footage Ratio
Medical Office 82,932 1 /200
(Phase I)
Medical Office 39,938 1/2oo
( Phase II)
Total
Number of
Number of
Spaces
Spaces
Re aired
Provided
415
416
200
200
615
616
F. A plicable F, ulations The medical facility is located in the
nor west `por on o a block designated MHO within the Terra
Vista Community Plan. This district is intended to be a mixed
use area comprised of the hospital facilities and office and
comcerctai uses related to the medical center.
Y1. BACKGROUND: On March 9, 1958, the Planning Commission originally
rev ewe t e site plan and elevations for the proposed medical
office complex. At that time, the Planning Commission approved the
proposal with the recommerAed conditions of approval.
III. ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant has revised the building elevations of
Ile - ulatory care building because of refinements to the
final floor plan. The colors of the buildings have r' q been
modified from light tan with green .glass to light grey r,fith
blue glass. (sue Exhibit "C "). The applccant is also
providing details of hardscape zrcas. As per -onditions four
and .eve of Resolution No. 88-61, the applicant has included
exposed aggregate finish with smooth concrete bonds in the
pedestrian walkways and handicap parking spaces of Phase t.
a. oesi ;fin leyiew Committee: The Design Review Committee (Mctdeil,
roistoy, o eman rev awed the revised plans on October G and
October 20, 1988 and ;Wade the following comments and
recommendations with respect to the project:
1) The applicant shall study the feasibility of revising
the proposed standing seam metal roof .:o a blue tile
treatment and report back on the finings at the
Planning COmmi,,:!sion meeting.
2) Final approval of the roof treatiaent and hardscape
revisions shall be subject to Planning Commission
review.
#-X,
I
,
a
PLANNINa COWISSION:STAFF REPORT
0R 88-01 - SAN ANTONIO COWuNITY fdoSPITAL
November 9, 1988
Page 3
The Committee reeonnenrk4 ap rop yai of the project and
e m-m ee comment w.ve seen incluGeu as con itions`
o_ approva in e a c e eso
III. RECOWENAATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commissio:h
approve Development Review 88 -01 through adOption of the attached
ResolW` on. (Standard conditions shall be as per the original
approviV of Environmental Assessment it d 0eveloppbnt Review 88 -01) ,
Res s ut ly s ttcS,
Br Bu
City nt
BB :SH:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan
Exhibit "B" - Previous building Elevations
Exhibit "C" - Revised Bcileing Elevations
Resolution of Approval
I
r( -tom OF
�,, ANC HO CUCAMONGA
r -lANNTXG DIVISION H4
CM AM STREET
ITEM-.
TITLE:
EXHIBIT: SCALE;
E
E
CUCAMONGA
DIVISION X1,5
Loll
ITEM: o
TITLE: Pre6otA5 Lau lcil" E `T
EXHIEIM -2 SCALE: '�-
,N -6
Im
0
E
U
.:f
e
0
A7'
As
L ti.
13 (T /IC-:'� -.;—
RES +01710N N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C"ISSION
APPROVING A 14,T,7ICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88 -01
FOR A MEDICAL CENTER CONSISTING OF 39,538 SQUARE FOOT
AMBULATORY HEALTH CARE FACILITY AND A 04,932 SQUARE FOOT
MEOXAL OFFICE BUILDING LOCArEU ON 10 ACRES OF LAw IN
PLANNED CflMMUN1i 7, LOCATED DISTRICT AT THE WITHIN SOUTHEAST CORNER ViSTA
MILLIKEN AVENUE AND CMRCH STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF, APH 227-151-13 AM) 14.
A. Recitals.
(i) San Antonia Community Hospital has filed an application for
the approval or Development Review No. 88 -01 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review
request Is r-;erred t,, as 11the application ".
City of Rancho tuc the 9th of
onductedeaa the andiconcluded
said meeting an that date,
(iii) All leaal prerequisites to the adoption ��q this Resolution
have occurred.
8. Resolution..
NOV , TNLREfORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved b� the
Planning Commission of the City of ?!ancho Cuamonga as follows:
set forthlin t4eiRe to s, Part A hereby this Resolution are true ind� correct.
2. Based upc,, sutstilZial nvidence presented to this Commissicn
during the above- refernrced on -.) ember 9, 1988, 'Including written and
oral staff reports, this Commission n,reuy specifically finds as follows;
located at the asoutheasZacornertof Milliken Avenuei3nd�Church Street with ea
street frontage of 1540 feet ,,d Tot depth of 1556 feet along Milliken Avenue
and is presently unimprved; and
(h) T'v proposed medical facility, c,nsisting of the
�embulatory car, ;enter and the physician offices, is iocate.l on a PVtioil of a
Klock designs* .2d MHO wath,rn ,he Terra Vista Pl&nned Coinnu�nity. The MHO zone
is intended to b- - "ixed lko ,2rna comprised of medical facilities and relatea
offices commere.
(c) 'Y., the facility Is designed to be a
►y
uses t
o tithe utt� a Ang Footh-vw- Aulevar -, The basis building emateri material
1
:1
PLANNING COMISS10N RESOLUTION NO.
DR 88 -01 - SAN ANTONION COWUNITY HOSPITAL
'govember• 9, 1988
Page 2
stucco, accented with the use of tinted glass and standing seam metal roof at
the mail, entrances. The structures are settsck in exce_a of 100 feet fror the
street so as not to impose the size and scale of the project an the
stree'ca,-ape. The lowest profile structure is oriented norther;y toward the
residential area while, Phe multi - story offices are oriented saW' and east
toward Foothill Boulevard ,nd the office and commercial users. The southern
exporure of the office towers display larger amounts of tinted glass to
reflect the more sophisticated character of Foothill Boulevard
3, Rased upon the su'ssk-anti }l evidence pre tinted to this Commission
during the above - referenced maetiig and upoa the specific finetngs of facts
set forth in paragraph 1 and 1 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the prooposed project is consistent with_
the ob�iec'i�es of the General Plan; and
(b) That the propose use Is in accord with the
objectives of the Terra Vista Community 'Plan
and the purposes of the aistrict in which the
site is loc-ted; ana
(c) That the proposed use is in compliance wilt
each of the applicable provisions of the Terra
Vista Community Plan; and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the
con,'itions applicable thereto, will not be
aatrImental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, -or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality ikt of 1970 and, further, this Comnist. sn hereby issued a Negative
Declaration on 'v%rch 9, 1988.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, This Commission hereby approves 0e application subject to
Baca and every condition set forth below:
(1) All conditions of approval, as contained in :Resolution 88-
51 shall apply.
(2) Sidewalk!Hardscape mreas shall be cons -ructed as follows:
W Exposed aggregate with smooth finish band shai 1 be
used in the plaza area at Milliken Avenue and Church
Street and on the pedestrian spine connecting the
corneri.=mwentaitoa to the north building entrance„
(b) Heavy salt finish concrete to be used on all other
.idewalks thrcuehot;t the project,
®.,
PLANNING CWISSIau RE$OLLqION; # �
DR 88-11 . SAN Q,NTONION GO", LAITY HOSPITAL
November 3, 1988,
Page 3
(c) Paver tiles shall be 'used within the north buildirg
entranci plaza. At the south entrance the heavy salt
finish concrete may be used for the devO opr:r'. of
Phase L When Phase It is developedy and the Overhead
canopy is built, the salt - finish concrete shall be
replaced with the pavers or exposed aggregate gih
smooth finish banding.
(3) Tree mainenance criteria shall be developed and submitted
for review and approval by the City Planner for tha proj',;cv
to encourage the ._ ,rai growth characteristics of the
selected tree species.
6. Tt'ie Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the ;,dop ±ion
Of this Resolution.
I
UPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9-ff DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHh CUCUNGAr I
BY:
Larry T. e , a rrnan
ATTEST:
ra u er,—Secre Rf
i, Brad Buller, Secretary a,. >he pianniq Comm
C ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify „fat the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adcpi?d by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th day of November, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: C"ISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS-
6.i
W N
O
� a
O
W uu<
j
y M fy q
,
v-ppw S OM �f. vest i
� i
Y�� F. �Mn ` M1v0 V•tR
a� ,Mt s 7q gYf l0 tl
(s�
q x5¢ Qa• �7�Mw D
' w�i
1� /M OIy N A w� QOC yy i� ^y�
C O p. 9 0 O V L� �� C A.
ZT � � -0
y�
9
_i \\
I-!
101A,
rlainal -poor CE LL'
&pppp Y'N O�iit
Oi.
w Q
s +�4'
%8_11
�SD
wV. y°1 Vj arCO
as4y�
01s y�
iy,�
�Jw
�oyi.
py
=..Vs e�yYy E0�,Y
S•
prW
ti V FS�
`'tea 'Et. i s
�.
tg0 ..
yy �bnY�T
`n��n. p spa.
M0s
iG
'1U=
V
� Y fi
NTI Up
iice!! ++� C
�•��{ ": q
y -u. pc i
`(dpi
`Y + Yp �1 R L
vyC
^
�H
y p i`-0�0 oge
Y yy
Y
&
��s��
,�N^g p�•
��a$■�i $ °.$1
4
a � '�"'
N M
��1yi
M
g6.�
EE
sii��li
*�s��q�q
Ug4L L i fLil " N w i D M'
��Sr Y��yj�S�.
S Y d "¢
�Cw ��"
.N'i3���
}ya mS•S `�11 N
Ci� �C "tl �Y
„! O
Y � •
yw' `1 �'ii Y �r'%n1
9wM ^q
X11
p
���� �
Yw
pi.�
9���a6
`
01�6�
7• � y M
6L1 ~C
S`N4�Sw�r`
a6`gy'1
q�f'y^
aTO� vy sue_
y
zejaI^_k
��I`..Z
.8 TL
VO 6N�OVS
�•
� ,�
b >t ZIP •Ow
Of. a
�j
WIT,-
iyy��
1 ..�i
1_•.. l ®0q�9/ ��!�yy����� y
0•�1ViM b0 L�6�1��
�.yN}`p }��..88�
�tl`` 'Ny 4
pp�r.�
�'�.�^
� Y�Y
Na�p� ^�
Y•SO��
S��i tMV"� ��.
e g
I H
a
!
W N
O
� a
O
W uu<
j
y M fy q
,
v-ppw S OM �f. vest i
� i
Y�� F. �Mn ` M1v0 V•tR
a� ,Mt s 7q gYf l0 tl
(s�
q x5¢ Qa• �7�Mw D
' w�i
1� /M OIy N A w� QOC yy i� ^y�
C O p. 9 0 O V L� �� C A.
ZT � � -0
y�
9
_i \\
I-!
101A,
1�`-
w
a
a
I
", F;a a fe ��S 2-
.e .$s a� ^S'^
viaa .v vs 322
Le b
OX a
v O Y � ^•�
.43 Ss 9 5o
N 4 a �4® Y•.•g
Y C O
e^V'o
60..0..
a y
c e .. fir,•,.. . {.
C w � p iN! •id' � Y
w 6° af9 N.b® 9r Y,0
yta F" d : a `Al
3V
UK
Ls.�y ryYy�
M.! a0
h
Orl&M Poor Quality
mg
oa�.ciCCCN:
O j e c N S i L O w� N
SaaB�ro»°$
-a
L SCN4 W�i.YT "Y� VM O >(fIC N.
��N!$�pS .d� LCtl p. >Y11ui oL'y06V Cti
6f� °i l � Y � 4 't• O Y Y M , l .�j • Y
S'C'Y.NGp�y�M.H yV y:Y QY iy.� I
YWBei� �D.M
°pMil SW��6�. LY.,ONiw� Q o ,C �(q•Y•
p1YS < @�p;Ry���y i■Rp4 �_�qin. �$'�.L $Y� ?fF�s Lpr
N.MNNLYY�tltl 3l�b� O �yG���p� ®14 W�.n q�I � ^i��IOV �CY
p Y IL �Y �S K`YN V
C
�n
4
ma
ti
9
�66m
y 9
tl
» Y�
�gw
�s4
�tl
�Vy
N q
a
iY
N
q
R
L�
�4
av
�e
C y Y
��
a
is
n
M
H b
2Y
a
iLwY.Y
Y N
rY
�6
a iJ®
yp M�tl
aq,Qg
x!7373
ari��Y
a.$`"�ig
•��
3.O pyy6
'FiOq�
V�ry
�•°+wNY.
1Yp.
r ytl Y �
aY Y V
LY.`u2p�
��w0
pqW
f�
L ]I`C
V ° V
YYV @•
Nay Y
��
s
�°
i� ^y��
-
AZ C
SIC
wF
4 e `qy
� tlgCQ
C ■admi
C°f �jC �•�
I
", F;a a fe ��S 2-
.e .$s a� ^S'^
viaa .v vs 322
Le b
OX a
v O Y � ^•�
.43 Ss 9 5o
N 4 a �4® Y•.•g
Y C O
e^V'o
60..0..
a y
c e .. fir,•,.. . {.
C w � p iN! •id' � Y
w 6° af9 N.b® 9r Y,0
yta F" d : a `Al
3V
UK
Ls.�y ryYy�
M.! a0
h
Orl&M Poor Quality
mg
oa�.ciCCCN:
O j e c N S i L O w� N
SaaB�ro»°$
-a
L SCN4 W�i.YT "Y� VM O >(fIC N.
��N!$�pS .d� LCtl p. >Y11ui oL'y06V Cti
6f� °i l � Y � 4 't• O Y Y M , l .�j • Y
S'C'Y.NGp�y�M.H yV y:Y QY iy.� I
YWBei� �D.M
°pMil SW��6�. LY.,ONiw� Q o ,C �(q•Y•
p1YS < @�p;Ry���y i■Rp4 �_�qin. �$'�.L $Y� ?fF�s Lpr
N.MNNLYY�tltl 3l�b� O �yG���p� ®14 W�.n q�I � ^i��IOV �CY
p Y IL �Y �S K`YN V
C
�n
4
ma
ti
9
�66m
y 9
tl
» Y�
�gw
�s4
�tl
�Vy
N q
a
iY
N
q
R
L�
�4
av
�e
C y Y
��
a
is
n
M
H b
2Y
a
N
iLwY.Y
Y N
rY
�6
a iJ®
yp M�tl
Xyl
ZEN
ti pro
pqW
f�
�$4»py0
QQy�
upptYp' �u
��
s
tl °L■ a
u `�•
i� ^y��
w�
U^
'a�QaaM�
Mi
b y
C
�
$so
dM
O Y
JY
vtl
i
COV (JA�
C7
~Ob�•N0
®
O w
WC
f
N
(((yid Y_wL • tYp��tlQM , CC e• CAB LL�U.tA, ul it .
-c 31 $g = I L, oil — O
_I �)h 9�,^•� � ���,�
~I. 6� Vii. .NrQ CC L +v•^ ^f M. p ~CY L
I
Ny qO pO N �p� ®OJOC�Le
�. S
y+�� ® tL .J WW Q +q Q. + +:TN S,°s r�dr �gyyyq
Oa♦N� '� I• YY. LY 'iT w® ro VVELO + \3
!{C!�
NyQ1Yy yY mv/1G
L a�Opi �i ire!
a' y�;!!pL�I;N EW -mow ay •Q' W "w. r. es aw "tl Y V + „�
,2 qYa �` 0^ 66 LL11 �iNLN ���t�
vp iY 1 §838 �.3 NC YR
� � V 9 � y� N !. � N w � �4 � ®� •� � �y a iR6 � p �� w p�p •� LN � O b
g w $ �• N
J+'."zc,y.L'
eQ Lv. V Ey'
i. d9°� fgq i.�F°' y�'asLe�� A$o u 9w �G
�CViYwg!+ C`x`« 6a _!w'Y+y•. SS S' ^6L�Y�.60.��
rw
N4 N9M Qw�.. •e w iva e: tiNg rev ,�c''.+� ^�A3S� s�� � �� °�
i ell e'.7
ova ang �e
ca^ a #�lNys
p M0 -e •nY Yq M .9 aLSbOr =� ml��w.6�'r�
w 1.22 y i w
+ N ! 'SA A • • 4 ^ ^ V E E G i s � # < +
�y ee A � 41
. IL a �
� R Y L C. f`.1 ®qN1 Q V
Yom► �4p• ./R 1. 4O�
Y r `
3''z
14 a
O •y Y
p1p��Y tl�Y�` wY U.CO' `� ^' p41.
3 +g ` qz t
N w +`p ate`
O y' l�w�° 6i tiW�L 'mG•i iN ♦^ �t0 e«wY y��..y. �S�p.
cG� ZED Na•• d�w4
01 i u:NO =61 i '1
� J Y N e C 6 �e
V Wr N Y A!wf 4 Uy Y 3 p A � p q Y L
� ^y
es w
13
n
LI
fiv
Q
f
tl
Ex
��g
"a
Y
�
rtl Sp M y
G
�6
ytl CQ
sn
oM
� =r
3
GPs
O
M4N
y�p
y�O
V
O N
u'
JJJ2
p q
y
SOS
fat
Q C
Ai
Y
C�YwY
L
as—
G�
P� ^u
; a4
Oil
Y
a�'tp9'M�y
a 4t Y
NQa
4 N
R
pQy+Ir
��V
4`Y y�ar
OMFii.
N��O
iLE
tltlY �.
YO•P
NY
HIS
H ISs
tl�otlr
g
p$.•.>
y a
LLi
_N �an�'
hl;
1
OfigInal Poor QuAtY
tl
aen u
�
rtl Sp M y
G
�6
ytl CQ
sn
oM
� X14o
$
9"
�
N Y
4 V O
N9
t
O N
u'
JJJ2
p q
y
■��r r�s
{Op(...
YO.
���.tli�rr
0.
±yyyyyy�
M
P� ^u
; a4
Oil
Y
a�'tp9'M�y
a 4t Y
NQa
4 N
R
pQy+Ir
��V
4`Y y�ar
OMFii.
N��O
iLE
spI
N ii Y
k..--
N
p$.•.>
y a
- M� V
tl
aen u
�
V
L
tl
M M
Lgo
t
O N
u'
■��r r�s
p
YO.
���.tli�rr
0.
±yyyyyy�
yya
spI
tlP aG
N
NC
0.V
^� v
N
Y
N
r
f
; •ma .N. kiwi. 11p �/@ ,C
w NYV
I
. r. 6 O.pa 9RCy Hi 9C .
O1S uyCN4 C YM YpY y� �
Usa E V 34 �`..�pya OMl t91� I yip V.4Y �' M} yw.
yySV\a b z ^�Nr!� v Ltly Lq p•���Mr ` q� 5N1
A6�i6 A M• �. 7rr.r Nr�V' Y 4 g� yi ML`i V '1'i
u a v _ t+�ri ` '.r tl e'.' p y g• `'S s. u {ay(g * � � y
'fyj�}pl��a ��.$ �e�r'a '.' a ' -r �.'�el �.q.• ��a,t�_ g �°a g� v_w
•.tl^ � K 4- @ fig+ -9 :.: 'H2 if v 4a� �0�3 ` � `tl*L �" $i tl� iC 6i C eRY `Ci �. S• H a GN +•+ O L' yY Y Oc � r Yi�i4 .• G. CV 'C0. � r LN C44OI gy� N LO
.pc
i 0.'E _ 5,2 � VA
a ` e i v ^O M
, -. :! fdk
See* ! er
m a f Mb46 P ,if Z,�ee." rav ask
t L� (� bC yVCA... I�
]V� YL� 9��4q N.Ntl 4A Pfed �y-x
CO y a ' � i/ X Y ptl 'y'
sex
' Y�19 yraa. tl�N ewgL
cwDV esis�R 3Q N.v v al.'r3.4
°+NNrVIZ .tl. p _a � 1 �30� � p91 as �y�. � ■u�6 °'�� u'� u�.W°� ge°q'i�
VVw AOp NN! •Oy dp. yy;9 ytl lri G'd�yJ�L+. eN. 74 y�•
" ^e "aea 3 .e idV jzj rAHIS vs- mg
a as cuvai« jj$ c
ti e O C Q CM N 1 Ly y �Ri ■A=YR pp
• YN
i
. C:!: LNYY soag e4 g pL t . VII
Q Y y
t
r Z R.
H
L L L y �I v a N `91 • O Y 7 Np. d.
Yr ww ` •• t1 (\ J Y L
Y.N^ ° GM
ay.G €Q ^`Gp■.��',
NCI Y ^6r � ai
a �w '� w•� � �.C�� � v � b C� C N `y'�a 7o Darya
ag� » 'r ^O` VV+ s . �'t as
^� ^aa
y • 4A� Y q �( it pq r p
�1I �ieg�•PSC �Y �° C Y r N
W � I
Y @b q gdy L■
iall
his a y y yaC
ydff r H�., i ^ LNnde %w 4 °w
u�4
lij 202,
g
`a• w, �� eiE� ■� �� i�y� l bs � 0 i� MOM Mb LIYIIIeY
G Y 6 r E «$ O W° M 6 0 21 A
8 o, 5! u;3 i$i �o� ..'� c v7w$a •mw '�a�*'Y
Nw ��• 7`a n ads N =rp4 5w v a p r� °= U��yD�
..ew ' yiau a. �. yC wO R. aY O W �Fe AQe •9
7Y 3YI^ tlCCV d aply" o gall y4� atl � ���= �
0. Elm Cq.i O1i Y.V M yam°"- "e� :�Z
Wh WY1.°i L qQyy S
QY
i 4
a- t y ^ •
CC °
NpY � V�•A Zviy� `
W ;'pE °S ^sae 3, g EN
#E�'ro :� °3S °w «e Ue JS���& QN' ` 1°
s �'j Y3. &g8 9 Its a~i�rdiyi� u ti L4 p gyp
wC.y+r"YY e{ �0�� r� � Y5 °
CIi�LY. �i L O CN YJ 1 0 ��yy�`la D it Y
w
'Res W
IZ -13
a ° °'qr° _ 3!-ypag a c•• 2 H.
_ n i1 ■ R` M _ sw
wy�i !y/�Cg e� 15-go a�j .iTe. .ai^ a'� {� �i►�y�
Y`1►Yy YYO.Ny N yW �m�YL.�QQjj y�. �L Ly $. 6i Y'Yt1�i~
ZZr w.L Lam` {O{..wyJu1 u``p¢'Y tl y~ aY�C .O' M ;r
OY.�r Y~wM Nn fi w Y� �9' yY
� M -2 V $ L q 9
NCj
n �
E
~ ` N
q r jb. ~ fYa rr .c yy.�
°tl
a }; Y
eYi 9 °
a ZZo ^.S Va
C$�, YrR'� ®yak
�� =`_N $�wiw 6 L J wZZ �Y+ OT � 4 Y
_ _a
31w
we
Y_ a
°1
q.
w:
K � N Y�V i N••C. Y E�wf 4
nr� cN a ��.� �i a � L:� aa•� g�� ` ao
N_ p� M M. gw � 9�:i i�.�Ch�� w'J♦L
r° f=
N GW L°C`�z °LA
C
Ec-
I
v
a
sy
d
YV O
M`M
�pr
4r .
yea w
w A
II
vp°
�D
a8 V
r L O
a
t u'f
N
'M r
q�
7
L
O
p Y
M
ioa
p C'>iyO.tlNS
N N
V,V Y�yp�
° 7yw
Ld =y Vp
vy N!NRWY •i
y �$ jai
0
ee L
p yye ~ S r R
lZlet
YVV y��s
ofi,w P&OF QQuelity
_rt� ppL
iVim°" a
g L
G p i b
E °M
Ja
L
��HOI � ■Q
L u
■i. g`s
V Ol G M, iM
C M.-
O°
V
y Q
V{�pyy
Asa
3
N
�6l
YW
S'F
tN.
P
�u
x3�
a
pp
+VC^
Cj
M
a {�y
V A
�
Y r
�
Y
C-4
V
�i�N
° y
a°
Q
C�
"rww
Pal,
A
th
�s Lo4p
N
,L
_
IL
V°
i
L
p
°-
0.0
p
V
L
L
�
C M.-
O°
V
y Q
V{�pyy
Asa
3
�p
�6l
YW
S'F
tN.
P
�u
x3�
a
pp
+VC^
Cj
a {�y
V A
�
d V
V
C-4
V
Aa
.2-,
M
° y
a°
Q
C�
"rww
Pal,
A
th
�s Lo4p
V
�wwpp
_
IL
V°
i
L
p
°-
0.0
E
D
DATE.,
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
November 9, 19Ji8
Chairman and K!mbers of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
REVIEW OR CMIUNITY TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE WEST SIDE
OP SAPPHIRE"STR i
I. BACKGROUND: On October 12, 1988, the City received a petition
signe STiy approximately 90 residents of the Marble Avenue- Celestite
Avenue neighborhood relating to the Community Trail improvemsruts
being installed on the west side of Sapphire S' treet, south of
Banyan Street. The residents raised two mai- concerns in their
petition (1) adequacy of the trail width, and (2) site distance
visibility.
On O:tober 19, 1988 the City Council conducted a hearing to receive
input from the residents and staff. At the meeting, the
Engineering staff indicated that, based on a field investigation,
sections of the fence had been removed in order to provide greater
sight distance at intersections, Several residents, however,
demanded that the entire fence be removed in order to address their
concerns about thj intersE'ction use and the trail width.
Its both their petition and, their testimony to the City Council, the
residents stated that the width of 0e trail (9 feet) was
insufficient to allow safe equestrian and pedestrian use. The
residents felt that 9 feet would rot allow 2 harsea to pass with
any "cushion ". Also, if children were walking in the trail with
horses, the children would be exposed to- potentially dangerous
situations if the horses were galloping or were to "bolt" near the
children.
Related to the width of the trail is the effect that the fencing
has; on the sight distance visibility. The residents stated that
the 3 -rail fence in effect creates a physical barrier that does not
allow adequate visibility up or down Sapphire Street. Residents
contend that drivers entering Sapphire from the side streets and
the local trail acce-s would have to pull out into the tratrel lanes
on Sapphire Street in order to see on- coming traffic.
ITEM I
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
review of Sapphire Trail
November 9, 1988
Pagc 2
El
Dun to the concerns raised by the area residents, the City Council
referred the sight distance issue and trail width improvement issue
to the Public Safaty Commission and the Planning Commission for
further investigation and consideration.
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Trail Improvements: In order to implement the goals an:i
Mjectives of e General Plan, the City adopted a series of
standards for construction of various trails within the City.
Amofi7 these standards includeC: the provisions for Community
trains within 20 foot parkways and for Community trails within
12 foot parkways (see Exhibits "A" and "B "). Typically, new
development within the City is required to dedicate a 20 foot
parkway thus providing a 12 foot wide trail, The 12 foot
parkway trail standard is used along the existing streets that
were approved prior to the adoV-,ion of the 20 foot standard.
With the 12 foot parkway trail, the trail is intended to be at
least 10 feet in width. The Sapphir. Trail improvements,
however, are different because Sapphire Street has an 11 feat
wide park -lay. With the installation of the equestrian fence 18
inches from the face of the curb, and the fen.: ing bei og
approximately 6-8 inches in width, t %- actual trail width i, .t
feet.
B. Public Safety Commission: On November 1, 1988, the Public
a e y ummission was in o —wived of the sight distance vis?bili;y
issue as a result of the equestrian fence installation. The
Commission recommended tha: this item be placed an the December
6, 1988 meeting agenda.
C. Alternatives: Due to the concerns eapressO by residents with
the ins" tallation of the trail improvements along Sapphire
Strut, staff is requesting direction from the Planning
Commission on the level of improvement desired for
"retrofitting" trailr along existing streets designated for
Community Trails, lice Sapphire, which have smaller parkway
widths.
In considering the possible impro iments to the trails, the
Commission has several options available. These options mr =3
include but are not limited to:
1. Lowering the height of the trail fen :.e;
2. Reducing the number of railings frost 3 to 2;
3. Do not construct a fence and rave the parkway as
decomposed granite; or
4r Use a City standard for 12 foot trails on the 11 foot
parkways. ���
PLANWiNG GOIAMISSI6N STAFF REPNT
Review of Sapphire Trail
November o, 1988
Page 3
Because the concerns of the residents were brought •dirersiy to
the attention of the City Council, and were directed to the
'..tinning Commission, this issue ,has not been reviewed by the
Trails Advisory Committee. Should the Flanziing Commission
determine to forward this matter to the Trains Advisory
Committt-a their next, meeting would be November 16, 1988.
II1. RECON98ENDATION: Stafr recommends tiat the .planning. Commission
cony er stOrs report and all publIC input can this matter and
provide direction to staJ on the desired level of improvements for
the Sapphire Trail and other similar "retrofit" trails o• refer
this matter back to stafx fo- further analysis and revie# to allow
the audit,onal input of the Public Safety Commission. �
Respectfully submitted,,
Brad B'al l e'
City Planner
68:St4:vc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" 20 Foot Community Trail Standard
Exhibit "B" - 12 Foot Community loai1 Standard
Exhibit "" - Location hap
Exhib it ` dente
D" - Petitions of the
f _-
1
4
0701..402 0 11-9 -88 PC !Agenda o'. 3 of ,3
F-
I- a
i
V ` W, _
o ,
,
� IL
AftL
gc 41
® ® r
s
0_
-0 v$ l
6th C4 c� ® w
a
U
CITY Cf ITEM:
RANCHO CUC-k A
PLANNING ( EXHIBIT -4 5C ALb
y
4. i
cv
'NIN 10l
7r-
H
w
P4
H
0
U)
FI
Pa H
�+
E-1 z
0
;
E-+
W
WW
W Oar,
H
U
UO
W
z W
UH
W
1W�
4
C4 ❑
0
U w
L)
w
wg<
k
a
U
cn
s
U
cv
'NIN 10l
7r-
CITY OF
PLANNING DIN'LSM E.ti�rflfilT:
—` --- SC ALL; -- ----__
w
Pa H
W
WW
H
W
E„ i
W
z
UH
W
H
P4 W
zC4 P
W
sE-ai
U rnn EE-.,
cn
s
w
ul
� Z
CITY OF
PLANNING DIN'LSM E.ti�rflfilT:
—` --- SC ALL; -- ----__
} t
LINDA VALENTI OCTOBER H, lose
6278 MARBLE AVENUE
ALTA LAMA; CALIF 35701
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
` C/O CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
C/O CITY ENGINEER
5320 BASELINE ROAD
RANCHO CVCTONGA, CALIF SS '30
DEAR SCOTT MURP!H4'�
TO FOLLOU -UF ON OUR�CONVERSATION OF' FRIDAY OCTOBER.7, 1SSS.
WE THE RESIDENTS OF MAR$'.£ AVENUE, AND CELESTT.TE AVENUE,. HEREBY
z DEMAND ,THAI' SAID CITY 1WROVEMENT ALRNG SAPPHIRE 5TT1EET BE REMOVED.
IT IS- A.SAFV1 HAZARD AS THE FENCE OBSTRUCTS THE VIED OF ON-COMINS
TRAFFIC. A VEHICLE MUST PROJE`'T ITSELF INTO MN- COMI10 'YRAFFIC TO SEE
ENOUGH TO NEGOTIATE: A TURN, OR CROSS MNM LEMON 3TR ,FT.
IT IS OUR UIEW THAT CHILDREN WILL BE PUT INTO A SPEC . "aft. RISK AS THEY
RIDE SKATEBOARDS, AND BICYCLES, PLONiG SAPPHIRE AT FAST EPEEDS. THE
FENCE IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR FEET TALL AND THESE CHILDREN WILL BE
OBSCURED FROM VIEW, ESPECIALLY DURING DUSK HOURS.
ALL MOTORISTS LEAVING OUR AREA FACE TRAFFIC THAT EXCEEDS THE SPEED
LIMIT BY A LARGE MARGIN. OBSTRUCTING OUR VIEW OF TRAFFIC PUTS ALL OF
US AT HIGH RISK OF INJURY.
r WE ARE EXPECTING CITY OFFICIALS TO ACT QusCKLY BEFORE ANY OF THESE
TRAGIC POTENTIAL SITUATIONS OCCUR.
WE ARE PREPARED TO SEEK COURT LARDER T6 CEASE C:SNSTRUCTION IF
NECESSARY.
ATTACHED IS A SIGNED PETITION OF THE RESIDENTS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
WE ARE PLANNING ON ATTENDING THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING, ALL OF
> US.
' j-1 EF.`ELY ]
'A uALEiNTx
WAghk
OCTOBER 10, 1SBB
AMENDMENT TO PETITION FOR REMOVAL OF FENCE ALONS SAPPHIRF FROM ALTA
LOMA CHURCH BOUNDRY TO BANYON.
IT IS THE OUERWELMiNG MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS WHO REQUIRE THAT SAIJ
FENCE BE REMOVED CCONSERVATIVE ESTIMATE OF OVER 80%). CONSENSUS OF
RESIDENTS FEEL THAT SAID BRIDLE PATH IS TOO NARROW FOR PEOISTRIANS
TO PASS SAFELY BY EQUYSTRIAN TRAFFIC, THERE IS NO PLACE FOR A CHILD
ON A BICYCLE TO SAF)7.1 PASS ANY HORSE. CHILnREN MUST CROSS TO THE
OTHER SIDE, OF SAPPHIRE, IF RIDING A BICYCLE OR G);ATESOARO. SAPPHIRE
CANNOT BE SA!:`Ls' :ROSSED DUE TO TRAFFIC-WHICH CuNTINUALLY EXCEEDS
THE SPEE» L.I::,
REMOVAL OF SAID'-.FENCE WOULD ALLOW ENCUSH SPACE FOR FERISTRIANS, AND
RIDERS TO PASS TH OTHER SAFELY.
ALSO, IT IS THE;OANIDN OF SIGtNERS OF THIS PETITION THAT SAID AREA
BE CEMENTED FOR SIDEWALK, AND LANASCAPING BE PROUI.DED BY THE CITY.
TREES THAT WERE MOVED AND REPLANTED ' ?N THIS WALKWAY ARE PLANTED MUC4
TO CLOSE TO EXISTING BLOCK WALLA. IN THE :VERY NEAR FUTURE THOSE
BLOCK WALLS WILL BE RUINED DUE TD'TREE ROOT DAMAGE.
w AS kEPRESENTATIUE OF THE SIGNERS OF THIS PETITIOM X WILL CLOSELY
FOLLOW CITY COUNCIL RF'ACTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
SINCERELY,
�� LINDfi VALENTI
c
OT
orional Poor Quality,
3ATE ADDRESS
---------- ---------------
SIGNATURE
--- - - - - -- - -- ----
--------------
4 1
--- VCLqdPj1. ----------
/ l) Marble
-----------
------------
-
11 ---------- ------ ---------
------------------------
.'17 11.11411eim-s
--------------
--------------
------
74 1 - - �,
- - - - --- - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - -
7 -------
9, ;7
----------------
------------------------
----------
---------------- -- -/ -- ------------ ----------- ---
--------------
----------- --- - - -- ----------- --
DATE ADDRESS
SIGNATURE'.
- --
- -- _
_�P �f"� Vie-- �.�- --- - - - - -- - --
- ------- - - - - -- -- - - -- -
-- , - -- -- _,------ - - - - -- - -- - i -- -- - - - - --
-------------------
_
--- ----- L/
VC
------ - - - - -- -
------- - - - =z� u��-
0A 6
0"
AI-
PrIginal Poor oiloty
DATE ADDRESS SIGNATURE
10. -�''
Io-
%% / t.�
0
-
/ -- ,�
-2 !/•�� --
�e s fi >�'----- ---
- -/ - fit_- !— •�'`— r —`c-- — - - - - -- - -- f
c7 i-S
Tcu— `rte'_`'_`` ,
�!,P-Ofq- ty
DATE ADMESS SIGNATURE
i 0� j- g-y_�__ 6 zd, g _ 'iQ -��-2" Ck— _ Ala -J-QA- -k
- - - - --
�° __— _____a—
- - --
ldig�� 6223 uE AV.
:aaoi - = -_ - -- - - - --
A t it \ F /
---- - - - - -- -ice
1"'CIEL -Marzllp - ------ 2-(� ( "; / - C� ----------
m
/! / I /•" " / /i{� , '_ — ------ -
a
0
d.
lu
1177-�-`
pom
r
DATE ADDRESS SIGNATURE
47• f
----------------------- ------
------------
- ---------
e
- ---------------------
1c,
------ -----------
1-43
+Mtain a lv Por,r 0 ?3r a I
1 n
DATE A1113R ":SS SIGNATURE
------------------------------------------ --- - - ---
QoT
----- - - - - -- ------------------
- - - - -- - - - - ------------------•---
. - - - -- _ - -- .--------- -- - - -. ----------.—_—r__--- -rte —_—
w-----------
2
-
t�.
r___— rw. rsrww—_ w-- r_—_— r—__ r____— r_ sw—a___wr._w--rw- -r_— _-- +•—r-R •.�i_� >r_'
♦.
Tl .n t
Original Poor Quaft
Ic
LESSIE AULETTI
9059 Citation Court
Alit Loma, Ca 91701
DATE: i 4 Octobsr, 1988
TO: Dennis L Stout, May ?r, City of Ranctw Cucamonga
city Council of Rancho Cummor gsa
SUBJECT-- Bra ft Path ConstrUtioa on Sapphire Street
near Mr. Mayor and iioroivble Cauf�jj Members:
Orr 12 f� O&W, t 9Gir, tuv Mara 13eth HwjWon, a personal feena, calls atxlesked a resident end
Tory time area egtkstriat� to ol>,ervs the subject bridle pith under construction andkh give her my
opinion as to its.placement and impost ul vnthe safety of both auto em,$ to Maple Street and horses
usirrf the facility. I had not bean preWotely aware ofthia project ae 1 $e'dom use Sapphire street.
Sue,epuently, I dravttrtthe Arm on that date a;, *returW tWay. On both tritai obSrsrved thgtat izasi
two major problems regarding ws�tg do seem �bviaus.
t. Autos attempting to access Sapphire $treat from either Maple or the street due north of
Maple cannot aea traffic approaching from the north. Even Ihough the trafficstopline °aes been
repositioned to the edge of the bridle oath, it was necessary for me to pull my auto tWA feet onto Sapphire
ro see any cars traveling aouth bn ifAt street. Tire vhtte posts were too tall for mail .,4 Over the top and
up the hill. Although traffic vft light at i NJ this day, it took me 3*en minutes to tea! v i safe le;;
turn onto Sapphire from Maple, andfive mf nutq to safely cross to Lemon Street.
2. The bridle path itselfi'j Only nine feet wide, i'bisis rod suKcient roontfor horses is
safety nnder all Conditions. After nmurifigN width. Iperforme6 ark expert mantatmghome with an
average sized (fifteen hand) Quarterhorse i a western equipmnt, i.a., a atarsdard ves#ern saddle and
bridle, with mg 5`4" adult daughter riding the animal. A standard four '-cat pips sorrel gste barely
permitted passage of terse and rider, Fac'.rapolatinq t9 antra: foot pathway t+ith a F gh cemen t block wall
on one side and post and rail on the other, it would allow barely eight itrchea bettrae well, tartca and
horsesif two passata+,ralk, As .., iMyallridersare3no lland all horsesareundercontrol , this isnot
adequate. lrnfortunatety, pea, , aid horsa sam not always under control.
I then asked a friend, ai,o a ling time resident and horse ovr,*r, Sue Arehart, to look at *.he ante and give
me her opinion. She etas also shocked at the safety issr!s fat both autos and riders. She vas ea ndfo
make a daft hand turn for several mi nat� off Maple et approxi r;�aisly 11 :30 AM today, and had to plea
tier car one to tiro fat onto Sapphire to *,ft , southbound traffic. Sinco traffic Cones were in place today
due to the York, we were both concerned U at etuthbound traffic mould be even herder to See if the cones
u. ere not there.
t ;seems to both Mrs. Areheri and myself that IN., bridle path itself serves r r, purport& es that particular
aryais rarely used by riders irethecommunity. Hie both toured the tract IjWolvW jndsaw no evidence of
.quwtrian use at this UMI.
Page
LESSIE AULari
9055 CZation Court.
.Alto Lama, Co 917Qem"IIIIal p6oi; t
We both agreed that lowering thft white pasta at kart one loot would Probably beep vlst bliltg s Mewhat,
but that if the path remains asis :omeadditional traffic contre w ia4eflnitelyneeded. Possibleafour
way stop at
the Lemon - MaylolSapphl re intersection would allow the irect to enter traMc flow irk a safe and
expedientmenner, However, the narrowness of that section of bride path makap safety for tortes and
riders anissue that should be adddressedas well.
Bath tars. Arehart and myxlf are past oftfcers of the Alta Loma Rldlrq Cl ud acts hm bear► itwaivW vith
horse shov inar*ement and safety issues. We are most concerned ftt bGth resideMa dndthe equastr?an
community remain on good terms with one anotMr and that safety foe all rasidectfs the priwry issue
here.
I have asked M -;,. ttegedrmie deliver Wfor read this letter to you as my heelth prevented me from
attending this meeting in person. Ram feel free to call meat home at anytime rcprdirq this issue.
3mc rely,
96?_9418
MI
_ Page 2 j
C
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOhGA
STAFF REPORT
` ' -
DATE: Novembe- B, 1988
TO: Chai -mrn and Members of the Planning Commission
FR0M., Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: BIKE TRAIL Oft Y!'CITOPIA AirNUE
1. ABSTRACT; Staff is requesting an interpretation regarding the bike
trail esignation for Victoria Avenue within the Etiwanda Specific
Plan.
II. BACKGROUND: The City currently has a project for Street work along
c or a 'venue. in conjunction with this street improvement
project, there is an opportunity to implement a master planned bike
trail along Victoria Avenue. Figure 5 -113 (Exhibit A') of the
Etiwanda Specific Plan indicates a "Bike Lane (In Pavement)" *along
Victoria Avenue, from the City limits westerly to the 'Victoria.
Planned Community.
III. ANALYSE:
A. -bike Trail Typas:
There are three types of bike trails commonly defined in
California :.
Class I Bike Route:
e pa is a special pathway designed for the exclusive use
of bicycles, which is "off- street" and separated from motor
vehicles by space or a ptw sical barrier. A bike path may
parallel m street or highway right-of-way or may be a special
right -of -way, such as a flood control channel; it may be grade
separated or have street crossings at designated locations. It
is identified with guide signing and may arse have pavement
markings.
Class Ii Bike Route:
Me ane s a lane on the paved area of a road for
preferential use by bicycles. It is usually located along the
edge of pavement or between the parking lane and the first
motor vehicle lace. It is identified by "Bike Lane" guide
signing, special lane lines, and other pavement markings.
Bicycles have exclusive use of a bike lane except for motor
vehicle and pedestrian crossings.
ITEM J
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
BIKE TRAIL ON VICTORIA AVENUE
November 9, 1988
Page 2
�J
Class III Bike Route:
share e�rou,,e $ a street identified as a bicycle trail
by Bike Route guide si;ning or pavement markings. The shared
bike route has no barrier, either symbolic or physical, to
delineate from the roadway for bicycles. Bicycle traffic
shares the roatMay wiW motor vehicles. The outside traffic
lane becomes thi width required for motor vehicle travel,
usually 10 or 11 feet, plus the 5 foot bikeway.
B. Trails Advisory Committee:
The Trails Adviso,Ry Committee reviewed this issue on October 19
and recommended a gully- separated parkway bike path to provide
maximum safety for bicyclists. This concept was ?iscussed at a
staff level in the early stages of the prepa.ation of the
Etiwanda Specific :11''an. A Crass I bike path would require an
expanded parkway and additional right -of -way. Many of the
properties along Victoria Avenue have been developed and
acquisition of right -of -way would most likely have to occur
through condemnation. The Committee was aware of these facts
in formulating their recommendation, but felt that the over -
riding concern should be safety of bicyclists. The Committee
was not aware that their rec-f* endation would conflict with the
a� requirement preserve xhistoric �rk palm trees on the norhside of thestreet
and the existing eucalyptus windrews on the south side to
maintain the character of VictoriL Avenue (E:.hibit W). A
bike path within the parkway would require the removal of these
trees on at least one side of the street. Therefore, the
Etiwanda Specific. Plan calls for an on- street bike trail (see
Exhibit W) to save the trees.
C. Options.
The issue is whether the "%-Z Lane (In Pavemsnt)" should be a
Clasp II bike lane or a Class III bike route. A Class II bike
lane would mean that a 5 foot wide lane would be striped with
special lane lines on both side of the street. The planned
section for Victoria Avenue is 35 feet of pavement which is
adequate to accommodate bike lanes and one-way traffic on each
side of the street. Unfortunately, such an arrangement would
require prohibiting parking on both sides of the street. It is
the opinion of staff that this is not a desirable option
because there are existing small single family lots without
room for guest parking that rely upon the street for visitor
parking. Further, the Etiwanda High School and Intermediate
School are both located on Victoria Avenue and presently
utilize the street for parking, particulariy for passenger
loadingfunloading during rain.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFc REPORT
BIKE TRAIL ON VICTORIA AVENUE
Uovember 9, 2988
Page 3
IV. RECOM6IENOATION: If the Planning Commission concurs with the Trails
A v sore omm-if'tee's recommendation to amend the Etiwanda Specific
Plan to provide for a Class I bike path within a parkway along
Victoria Avenue then staff should be directed to initi.te the
amendment. :-f an amendmem., is initiated, both the Hfatoric
Preservation Commission and Pablic Safety Commission will aI so
consider this matter because of the landmark status of the trees
and the potential safety issues. If the Planning Commission does
not concur, then Staff would rec,mmnd that the Comeission make an
int3rprctation, by minute action, that a Class III bike route using
signs only and sharing the roadside with parked cars is consistent
with the intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan,
Res' -Ae"tf fitted,
Br e
City P anner
BB:OC:js
Attachments: Exhibit *A" — Figure 5 -18 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan
Exhibit "B" - Figure 5 -13 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan
Exhibit "C" - Figure 5 -38 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan
J -13
24 TH
I,, I lie
Equestrian Trails
Blke d ano (in pavonmm)
131ke Path (in Parkway)
iii COMMUNITY
TRAILS
I -Irr
zs sri
IU
KI
L
1r
ji
r
s
J-'J
1
t
Grove
EXISTING STREET
EE T4 BE P+REEER
I Existing Windbreaks "Offilloo
PON"
'� Existing T,nss
- Oahe
STREET TREE
PRESERVATON
CHERRY AVENUE
FIG. 15-36
i[A
11
VICTORIA AVENUE
Elst Of East Arg.
FIGS SM37
Pike
CTORIA AVENUE
WQst Of Ealst Ave.
FIG. 5-38
Ll