HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/12/28 - Agenda Packet /0701-02 012-28-88 PC Agenda o
MN OF
c •P NNING CQ*vL'vIISSION
z
tCCNIA
WEDNESDAY December 28,!$88 5:00 p.m.
LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE
RAk1CHO;CUCAMONGA CALI18GI NIA,
L Fledge of Aftisme
M Ron nail
Commissioner Blakesley Commissioner Emerick
Commissioner Chitiea _ Commissioner McXlel
Commissioner Toistoy
..ems. Announeemen's
IV. Approval of
December 1,4,l' Z
V. Covsent Calendar
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to bar routine
and riot-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at
one time without discussion if anyone has concerti over any item,
it should be removed for disi:ct ision.
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMrr 88-35 HUGHES
INVESTMENTS-A request for approval of revised elevations
as required by Canditions of Approval for Phaee I of a
neighborhood shoppicg center, consisting of two reta.l shop
buildings of 13,024 square'feet and a service station of
_ square feet on SPnd zoned "Village Commercial Center",
1 located at the northwest corner of Base Line and Victoria
t Park bane At'N: 227-111-28,340 and 35.
s I
VI. vubme Rearinp
The following items are public hearings in which concerned
inc; iduais may voice ther opinion of the related project.. Please
wa'•l to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission
by stating your name and11tt Such opinions shalt be
li.,*nited to S minutes per individual oaEh pir-ject:
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 9AD PARCEL MAP 11891
O'DONNELL ARM STRONG. BRIGHAM & PARTNERS- A
,'`division of 131 acres of land into 24 parcels in the Minimum
impact Heavy Industrial designation (Subarea 9) of the
Industrial Specific Plan,located-on the south side of Arrow
Route at Milliken Avenue-AMs 229 111 23. -
VIL New Businees
C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT it ,
REVIEW 8846 - OEDORKELL. ARM T!c2ONG. 13RIGRAM do t
PARTNERS= The review of a Master ;Plan far a 1 1-sere
inA'ustrtal complex and.Phase :t,onsisting of six(6)industrial
buildings totaling 635,970 square feet on 32A acres of land in
the Minimum Impact heavy Industrial designation(Subarea 9) `
of the Industrial Specific Plan,located on the south side of
Arrow Route at Milliken Avenue-APN: 229-111-23.
VIIL Director's Reports
D. CONSIDERATZON TO INSTRUCT-STAFF TO STUDY AND
INITIATE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM M ,$14
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE TO LM 4-8 DWELLING
U PER ACRE ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD
SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE Oral Report,
IS. Commssion Business
X. Public Comments {
This is the time and place for the general public to address the
Commfasiton. Items to be discussed :',`ere are those which do not
already appear on this agenda.
XL Adjonmment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations
that set an 11 p.m. odjo;unment time. If items go beyond that
time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.
`1
ViCINITY MAP
i••.,r...w.w.w...., w. �•w+w.q iw...y. �.w.w.r.w•s.u.+.w•�..u..� Y"" ..^*'w'r•.w. .,w.r.�.w.w.w. .....
ri
���r.r�wa+�ey'arw wayrw� f
L Y1i j
r Nxhfdr � L
t COLL �•w
i ctcsu
w r
`\
xtas awe sax sa w; rertarwwn
wwwomok�.
A � GIDM tox�N Ca NALL x0 'K
;.
A 4
x � xNxeraxw ��
FxW4� ai'rR.+m.+Ma+�� 8a !lll
�i
b
CLCAWWOA-ONAsn CD Nrr NrrrDNAc NAh
j 4 - DxiA#'� 1xrF#xRfrtlxit. aAMo#°' 1
i'1 r OF JVAt WJ Ouc
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
• r
DATE: ece;,cher 28, 1988 j
TO: Chairman .ad Members of the Planning Com^ission 1
e'ROH: Brad Bul'er, City Planner
BY: Steve Hayes, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: CG'NDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-35 . HUMES INVESTMENTS y ►► request
Tor approval of revised -elevations as requ re x h,sditions
of Approval for Phase I of a neighborhood shopping center
consisting of two retail shop buildings of 13,024 square feet
and a service station of 2,187 square feet on 13nd zoned
C "Village Commercial Center" located at the northwest corner
of Base fine and Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-111-28, 34,
and 35.
I. PRWL�T AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested:_ Approval of -evisions to the previtusly
` approved building elevations for Buildings 2 and 3. No other
modificatiens to the previous approval of Environ-m-e -aT
` Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 88-36 are being
requested.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North - acaftf- di High-1-ensity Residential (14-24
dwelling units per acre).
South - Vacant; High Density Residential (24-30 dwelling
unit, per a-re).
East - Single famiiv residential and nsrsery; Aedium Density
Residential (8-�14 dwelling units per acre).
Driest - Vacant; Medium High Density Residential (14-24
dwel l i g units pet- acre).
C. rieneral Plan Designations:
5 ec 3i-=--HigTi Density Residential j14-24 dwelling
units per acre).
North - Medium High Density Residentiat (14-24 dwelling units
per acre).
Souto - High Density Residential (24-30 dwelling units per
acre).
East - fledium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per
acre).
West - Medium High Density Residential (14-24 dwelling units
per acre).
ITEM A
PLA,:NING COWISSION STAFF REPORT
p RE.- CUP 1'48-35
I December 28, 1983
Page 2
I
i
D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and covered with
native vege ron. a easterly boundary of the site is the
fully landscaped and improved Victoria Nark Lane.
Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square F.-,-king Spaces - Spaces
of Use Footage. Ratio Required Provided
Retail/ 13,C24 11250 53 66
Commercial
Service Station _2,187 3 spaces 9 9
plus 2 per
j service bay
Total „15,211 62 75
F. Applicable Re ulaticns: The Victoria Planned Community Village'
a rc—TaTcenter zone reta,ff/commercial shopping
centers and service stations, subject to the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. AML
II. BACKGROUND: On November 9, 1988, the Planning Commission
o�rr g Pa y reviewed the site plan and building Elevations for the
proposed commercial/retail center and service station. At that
time, the Planning Commission approved the proposal with the
recamnended Conditions of Approval.
III. ANALYSIS:
A. General.• The applicant has revised the building atevations of
the c ierciat/retail buildings and the Chevron Service Station
facing Base Line Road (see Exhibit "C"). Also, revisions to
the store front elevations indicating recesses and protrusions
have been provided (site Exhibit "D"). Resolutijn of Approval
No. 88-228 (3-Planning Division) requires the applicant to
prepare revised color, d elevations for review and approval by
the Planning Comngissicm for Phase 1.
0. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Tolstoy,
- mer r. , o eman;-rtv'i""Cmed the revised plans on December 8,
1988 ,nd approved the Case Line Road elevations as presented.
The following comment was made regarding the store front
elevations:
1. The applicant shall Provide a typical floor pan
and revised elevations of the store fronts to show
articulation of typical units.
PLANNIMG OMISSION STAFF REPORT
RE: CUP 86-35
lecwt,r ?P; 19t%8
Page 3
IV. RECOMI+IENDATEQR: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve Con , onal Use Permit 53-35 through adoption of the
attached Resolution ,'Si:andard Conditions shall be as per the
griginal/+;approval of Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use
Permit
Respect u'Ily submitted,
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:SH:ko
Attachments: Exhibit "KII - Site Plan
_ Exhibit "B" - ?revious Building Elevations Facing Bass
Lane Rood
EW bit "C4 - Revised Building elevations Facing Base
Line luf will"
.
Exf4ibi't "{i1° .- ztevised Store Front. Elevations
Resolution, w�'Approyal
k, �
MA
�s
•
r.
• Y. % A
- ors
a
C/f
i r'Tfl
r.J j®m
o �
r OF ITPM: CUP 8 8-35
MANNING MVISION
M
;r a
o � I
'
$�
m Z
F-,_ 1
m M
PAO
0 \
r vi-
4
i
o
CITY i OF ` 4o ITEM: 4 V 4 9' J 7
RANCHO C V CA N A TITLE:.,mLC t�is ed
fawc
.i —wow tua
F �..E
1
PARTIAL STOREFRONT ELEVAMN '
PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN
CITY OF ITEM:, CUP SS-3S
RANCHO -OUCA
PLANNING DIVISION ISION ' � ��c�tt��m D" an A irv. •-
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING MISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-35 FOR APPROVAL
OF REVISED ELEVATIONS AS REQUIRED 81' THF. CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR PHASE I OF A NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER
CONSISTING OF TWO RETAIL SHOP BUILDINGS OF 13,024 SQUARE
FEET AND A SERVICE STATION OF 2,187 SQUARE FEET ON LAND
ZONED "VILLAGE COMMERCIAL CENTER" LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND VICTORIA PARK
LANE, AND FLAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-
111-28, 34, ANG 35.
A. Recitals.
(i) Hughes Investments has filed an application for the issuance of
the Conditional Use Permit No, 88-35 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On the 28th day of December 1988, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
fill) All legal prerequisites tc the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning C(xmisr...jn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cohmmission
f during the above-referenced public hearing on December 9, 1988, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
f
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
I (a) The application applies to property located at the
northwest corner of Base Line Rsad and Victoria Park Lane with a street
frontage of 743.73 feet and lot depth of 350 feet; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, tho property
to the east is residential, and the property to th,? west is vacant.
(c) The property is zoned "Village Commercial Center'" by the
Victoria Community Plan,
i
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
RE: CUP 88-35 - HUGHES
December 28, 1988
Page 2
3. Based upon thf substantial evidence prdsented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the
General Plan, the objectives of the Develepment
Code, and the purposes of the district in tinich
the site is located.
(b) That tie proposed use, together with the
conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public hearth, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements io the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code
and Victoria Community Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds_, 'd certifies th,`t the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission issuad a Negative
Declaration on November 9, 1988.
S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves*denies the application
subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached
Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. j
Planning Division
1) The applicant shall preivide a typical floor
plan and revised elevations of the store fronts
to shoat articulation of typical units.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 19W,
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF -,MCHO �XCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Chairman
ATTEST:
grad Buller, RecreFairy
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
RE: CUP 88-35 - HUGHES
December 28, 1988
Rage 3
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the G'ity of Rancho
Cucamonga, do heroby certify that the foregoi;-^g Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the' Planning C :lssion of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a r pliar veating of the Planning Coi=ission held
on the 28th day of December, I988;, 'by the follwifig ante-to-wit:
AYES: COMlM ISSION€RS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSEN'd: COM POI SSIONER,S:
I
I(I
f
III
_—�— -- CITE'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 28, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REBIEH 88-36
OWNNELE, 'm The review o a
Master Plan iar a -acre-industrialca%plex and Phase I
consisting of six (6) industrial buildings totaling
635,970 square feet on 32.+4 acres of land in the Minimum
IhipactlHeavy Industrial designation (Subarea 9) of the
Industrial Specific Plan, located on the south side of
Arrow Roue at Milliken Avenue - APR: 229-111-23.
RELATED FILE: Parcel Map 11891
I. PROJECT AM SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Action Requested: Approval of Master Plan, Phase I
Tevelopmenpme ?n3 issuance of a Negative Declaration.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning*
5-F n -- vacant; n u r a pecific Plan (Subarea 8)
South - Industrial buildings Industrial Specific Plan
(Subarea 14)
East - Industrial buildings and vacant; Industrial Specific
Plan (Sobares 9)
West - Industrial buildings; Industrial Specific Plan
(Subareas 8 and 9)
C. General Plan Designations:
Project bite - Reavy Industrial
North - General Industrial
South - Ozwieral Industrial
East - Heavy Industrial
West - Heavy and General Industrial
D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an
average s ope a - h frm north to south. The site is
bounded on the south by the AT&SF Railroad and on the north by
Array Route. TtillikiA Avenue, south of Jersey Boul-card, will
be part of this fi V's project tc- provide an underpass �4 go
i under the railroad tracks.
E
f
ITEM 8
PLANNING; C"ISS10R STAFF REPORT
OR 88-36 - O'Donnell, Armstrong, Brigham b Partners
December 28, 1988
Page 2
E. Parkin Calculations:
Number 3f Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided
Building 1:
Office 12,600 1/250 so 54
Manufacturing 20;,000 1/500 40 40
Warehousing 16,568 1/1000 17 17
Truck I/dock door 1 1
Building 2:
Office 81000 1/250 32 33
Manufacturing '15,000 1/509 30 30
Warehousing 75,176 1/ludo 16 16
Truck - 1/dock door 1 1
7F,,f7F -7V 'Sif
Building 3:
Office 91500 1/250 38 38
Manufacturing 15,000 1/500 30 30
Warehousing 11,970 1/1000 12 12
Truck 1/dock door 1 1
3Ti,470"
Building 17:
Office 32,000 1/250 128 129
Manufacturing 30,000 2/500 60 60
Warehousing 15,727 1/1000 16 16
Truck - 1/dock door In
Building 21:
Office 44,700 1/250 179 179
Warehousin, 20,000 1/10M 20 20
20,000 1/2000 10 10
170,868 1/4000 45 45
Truck 1/dock dtijur 40 40
Building 24:
Office 30,000 11250 120 125
Warehousing 20,DO 1/1000 20 20
20,000 1/20M 10 10
99,941 1/4000 25 25
truck t/dock dear 28 23
f
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 88-36 - O'Donnell, Armstrong, gr{gham a Partners
December 28, 1288
Page 3
I
II. ANALYSIS:
A. Master Plan:
1. General a- The purpose of the Master P1ar, is to serve as a
guid'e"Tfine for future development by establishing driveway
access, overall circulation system, drainage pattern:,, and
some architectural and site p 9 9 rennin designs. the overall
Master Plan is intended to create a unified development,
1�7e it a l
wh _ �t the same time mainta,ninq the potential for self-
suoporLing businesses on individual parcels.
2. Lot Sizes and Widths - 'r+e app'rlca,�t is proposing to
subdivide e acres .nto 24 parcels ranging in size
from 2 to 13.8 acres. Many of the smaller parcels (2-3/2
acres) are located along M:1I4cr 'venue and Arrow Route
with ;he larger parcels lee-4ted ie south side of Jersey
Boulevard and at the center of « site (Faro*1 18).. The
Industrial Specifilc Plan requires that parcels within 1,Do0
feet of Arrow Route have a minimum lot size of 2 acres and
the parcels outside of that limit have; a minimum size of 5
acres. The proposal indicates that 7 lots (Pero ft 5, 6,
7, 16, 17, 19, and 20) do nrt meet this requirement. The
Industrial Specific Plan doer, however, give the Planning
Commission the authority to reduce the lot sizes through
the approval of a Master Plan provided the lot
configurations, circulation, etc, meet the intent of the
development standard. As a result, the applicant has
provided a conceptual layout of buildings and circulation
for the entire 131 acres. Projects on indl4iduai lots
will, ho4ever, be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Co=ission separately.
The Industrial Specific Plan also requires that parcels
along Special Boulevards have a minimum lot width of 300
feet. The parcel map indicates that lots 2-6, 12, and 14-
16 do not meet this requirement. As with r,l•e parcel size,
the Industrial yoecific Pkn gives the Planning Commission
the authority to reduce the for widths through "a Master
Phan process pro,'iided the proposed widths and driveway
locations meet the intent of the original standard.
3. Rail Service - An objective of the Industrial Specific Plan
-To—provide for the use of rail see, ;e for those
properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur
lines and make provisions for the continuation of rail
service in the future. As proposed, the Faster Pl-n will
provide spur lines e,.-ndinlj north off the main line fcr
PLANING CONQMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 88-36 - O'Donnell, AMEtrong. Brighar L Partners
December 28,, 1988
Page 4
service of parcels 11 and 22 and spur lines running
parallel to the main line to service parcels 23 and 24.
The Industrial Specific plan, however, indicates that two
spur trues should be provided from the main line at the
south portion of the site extprnding :north to Arrow Route.
While there is r, discrapancu betlreeh wh&t is pr4p.sed and
what is ind cats, in the ttniustrial Specific Plan, `the
Pianniy.g Ccmmission may mend or delete, on a site-by,site
basis, the rail service development standards duriO,g the
development/design review process. In order for the
Planning Comrnission'to anthnrixe any modification to the
rail service, the ,following must be determined:
a) That installation of a lead or spur :rack cannot be
accomplished Sue •t4 physical constraints on or
adjacent to the project site; and
b) Other existing or potential rail service pMoperties
wi11 not be negatively affected In their abil:tr to
accommodate rail service activity as a result of the
modifications to the standards.
During the initial r`vieve for this development, the rail
service issue was discussed by staff. It was the feeling
of staff that the rail service, as proposed, met the intent
of the Industrial Specific Plan and that spur 3firws would
not have to be provided up to Arrow Route for the following
reasons:
a) That the spur lines are not proposed to extend beyond
Arrow Route ant the property between the main line at
the southern end of the project and Arrow goute is
currently under the control of the appIcant. No
other propefties will be negatively affected in their
ability to 4mvide rail service as a result of the
mad ficatian and
b) That the extension of the spur lines beyond Jersey
Boulevard would t.^ease extreme slopes an the north
sides of the street and practicti difficulty in
providing rail seraica for buildings located Porth of
Jersey BculevaM; and
c) That the extencicn of the rail lines north of Jersey
Boulevard would create two additional rail crossings
at grade on what will eventually be an extremely busy
street,
PLANNING COMh1ISSION STAFF REPORT
OR 88-36 - O'Donnell, Prmstrong, Brigham & Partners
December 28, 1988
Page 5
The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Tolstoy, Coleman) were
also informed about this issue and expressed concurrence with
the spur line modification.
B. Phase I Development: Phase I development consists of the
cons uction of buiTcBngs on the Parcels 1, 2, 3, 17, 21, and
24 ranging in size from 36,470 square feet to 266,500 square
feet in area. As indicated -by the applicant, the primary
function of the buildings will be for warehouse use. Some
manufacturing use, however, may be expeated, particularly in
buildings 1, 2, 3, and 17. Buildings 21 and 24 are expected to
be large warehouse and distribution centers. All buildings are
designed using painted concrete tilt-up panels ;n white and
grey tones. Glazing will be provided in 3 colors (blue, green
and grey) to provide an accont at the entry areas and along the
��:reet frontagcs.
C. Design Review Committee: The Desigp. Review Committee (Emerick,
HcNlel, a s toy, has reviewed the proposal on three
occasions with a different combination of members at each
meeting. Through the various meetings, the Committee has been
continually concerned ab�'ut the design of the buildings at the
entry areas. The Committee has felt that more "excitement" be
provided to set off the entry areas from the remainder of the
buildings. At the most recent Design Review Commtittee meeting
I; of Decamber 8, 1988, the Committee recommended approval of the
building elevations. In addition to the building elevations,
the Commitui has made the following recommendatiors:
1. Plaza areas should be more accessible to the employees.
Doors should be provided for buildings 1, 2, and 3 that
lead directly to the plaza areas.
2. The plaza areas should be designed with a physical
separation from the entry areas.
3. Vari-tion should be provided in the building setbacks of
the Master Plan along Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route.
4. Landscaping should be installed on a block-by-block basis
in order to provide a consistent theme throughout the
development.
D. Grading Committee: During the course of the review of the
project y the Grading Committee, it was identified that 3
large parking areas (both truck and automobile) would have to
be utilized as temporar,, rater storage areas during 140 year
storms due to the insufficient size of the existing storm drain
PLANNING COMI55ION M',V REPORT
DR 8$-36 - Q'pannelZ, Armstrong, Brigham b Partners
December 28, 1988
Page 5
pipe located at the south property boundary. This means that
water would be ponaing in the parking areas of Parcel 21,
between Parcels 22 and 23, and between Parcels 23 and 24 for a
' ieriod of up to 4 hours. In two of the areas tNe approximate
depth of the water would be 18 inches while in the third area,
the depth would be approximately 28 inches, These areas will
be used for truck loading, truck parking, and/or automobile
parking, and staff feels that the depth of the ponding. 1n the
` period of the water storage is excessive.
Various alternatives have been pursued by the applicant and
staff to try and resolve this situation. To date„ no
satisfactory resolution has been found. Staff is concerned.
that to reduce the storm water depth would appear to require
f modifications to buildings, such as location and size, and
other site revisions which may significantly alter timm Raster
f Rlan. Therefore, staff recommends that this items based on the
f information provided to date, be continued until such time as
previously requested hydrologic and hydraulic data is submitted
and reviewed for accuracy indicating that on-site storage
depths will not exceed 18 inches in truck areas or 12 inches in
auto parking areas and that the time of such maximum storage
shall not exceed 4 hours, If, between npa and the 'Manning
Commission me,3ting, information is provided that resolves this
situation, the planning Commission will be apprised as part of
an updated oral presentation at the Planning Commission
meeting, If the Planning Copzmission approves the project,
staff suggests a condition that any modification to the Master
Plan be reviewed and ap{droved by the Planning. Commission.
E. Environmental Ass*zsaFent: Based on the information provided to
a , staff as J-dentTfied that the water storage,ponding
proposed at the southern portion of the site may present a
threat to the public health, safety, and welfare. If this
matter is resolved to the satisfaction of the Planning
Comission, issuance of a Negative Declarationk would to
appropriate.
III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS• In order for the Planning Commission to
approve Welffiter"P;3n and the Phaoe I development, facts to
support the following findings must be nett
a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of
the General Plan; and
b) Than the ~aed use is in accord with the .',3ectives of the
Industriai :specific Plan and the �aurposes of the district in
which the site is located; and
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT..
OR 88-36 - O'Donnell, Armstrong, Ort9ham A Partners
December 28,, 1988 %
Page 7
Aft
c) That V p proposed use is in conformance with each of the
applicuble provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan;and
d) That the proposed use, togethe.- with the conditions applicable
thereto, will not detrimental to the public health, safety, or
►eelfa-., or materially injurious to properties or improvements
in the vicinity,
IV. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be continued for
two weeks to allow a more detailed. analysis of the drainage issues
' along the southern portion of the site. If additional information
is provided and the problem is reso►ved, a resolution of approval
has beee�ss included for adoption. The conditions of approval include
a requRreftent, to reduce the depth of ponding to an insignificant
level (19 and IO inches)
n
Respect 1,1y submitted,
:f t
Brad ul1er t •
City Planner
i
BB:SM:vc
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Parcel Hap
Exhibit 'Y Master Plan
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
Exhibit "a" 'Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
II
1`
i
i
r
''r , X A a� -_�.-�,�—.•. Yj• r'---• ngsr• Y �� �-� + t i t t
Lim
js' wV + d c { � ri t ' •
its
.. .y� �`t.'_ 4' � t��'.1 y`'�.+ vi='s iF� r= ,_•i '• - i v���i + i �1
06 �1*
41
•ll' ` w V i`�C '.�. i .,}q'�, �R,'+' r �'• „i t` . f i i It
'-y'�� c�'. irlL_ \' •--� Y ._vi- -Jw._ � _-t He_ a-�� � ,�_ { i i t ,B• _ �.� ��
j+ T ^•.�. •tt?� • � t f� f't�!�i II1•$ {� t ��"-mac\ -i itr� �1
•��ea�•, ,U�ai�ff ��T �`g'V .��® t Yi` 1 ifc` �• 4�'" 4
Eii
1, 13
CCC(7 r
CITY OF MEND AW 3
RA.�lsll D CUC-k r
TITLE:. .f�FG
PI.1 :li;aiC`viG DIVEM EXHIN T, lag SCALE,:
no
an
styVIM
ISO
oil
man _
ate/ _
� . i wool _
■M i i Room
■is■ ■UNN �.
�IN, 1 Nunn �]
NONE
(in �� ■ ■ _
on 5
WOMAN.
i songs■ M !!!
1
! NIXtTH
t
39 E • !
V
3 j
N � n
a
i ! i
441
Z
1i`
i
1Lljlk � Fl .
-
(� ifll ( id �i ! II l� �
. R
P LQ
I Ct(�Pt�1i!
j
'"�Y y�'4'n ems✓
l
Y
i: IV. I Rt I {
i yi � i Nt7RTH
Lc
I ,
IN
•. � rr JY i T.`1�:
_ r ---
iT�1Ti'UTfTT",�
s lisp I I I If !
6:
I I I
I I F1I
ry�sr��a
CITY OF rrEim
RANCHO CIJC'ANIC NGA TITLE:/, = .t►r+C%
P'fAi"NNING DIVEM EXHIBIT. sckLE.
• FMB - �, , ,.
�►..R. _,,,�,,,,, j
METRIC
MR
.im u
um
IMM
m Ed
ice, s ii
i .
1
.l
lr
•i'
a �:
Y?
t.„
�Y
t \
C��Iltru.D, .M MIM�XI�ti p#IIR��
o
VM�u a
y _
. !its ;,�
R
fain
WNW,
r• :, •. IIP.:__ ..ill ��s• ,J
i+
I
rnw r
.. iJv
1.�_�rrrt llttlttU►�
4,
�qtPasal L
r:
S
1 0 A r
M
MON
E
�an Oan
Ila
now
---------------
t
1
• u� A
1
NOR�j ELEVA ON
I 4 T
I ( 1
EA,�ELEVATIO!V
I
WEST ELEVATION
i
i
SOUTH E!EVAMON
a aa�E V
(i
l
PIA1oi1VIlY *DPASM EXHIRT, SCALE:
I
C,� a
! T TT
Nt1F3m E E Igm
_ I 4 l
BAST ELEVATIOk
SOUTH F,-,Llm&TIQN
CFI . crm
CITY OF ITEM:
PLAN NM V I` DIVEM EXHIMT':,_. :_�_2 SCALE--
jl
NOF?T1#UVAT10N
1
i
EAST ELEVAT
t f �
SOUTH E-J-,F.VA'aO?
r
�s Qt. Ltt+ ■�
RANG` J rCUCAN!( SA TITLE., r ':
PLANNING DIV19M EXHIBIT: � SCALE o
z
1
w
w ul
. . III
I
e `
{ I
I
4
i 1 t
I -
t
' I 4
I
f I
I
6
F T'
A
CITY O ITE,1v1.v.-4' 'f-
C RA.NCM C TNGA TITLE-
MANNING ,�—c�.��e ?GW -- ✓?`
DIVA EXHIBIT. A--7 SCALE- ._.
r X.
7
"`'' Sri,
m:m11
Mum
■.gum i Ir
■..• ,0110111=1.
1 ! No
man
man
I�t
...■ ���
■.
■.M .no
� �. ME11
111:. 11�
111�: 1111 .
Its.
IIIII
RIP�_�
Non
mill
h:
I Ilia
1 1
HI III
non III .H
L . a 1 i
,:U."I
■I
ass
oll '
,10*0
O p�■1■1
� � 1
n.N IN,s
r Ism cta MI
�rs�„ o dwiii
r,�
o■b .r
• . -� Illll
=a
# x i
1
i
I
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA►11ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88-36, THE REVIEW OF A
MASTER PLAN FOR A 131 ACRE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX AND PHASE I
CONSISTING OF SIX (6) INDUSTRIAL BUILDIRGIS TOTALLING
635,970 rlUARE FEET ON 32.4 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MINIMUM
IMPACT/HEAVY IuoumIAL DESIGNATION (SUBA4EA 9) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
ARROW ROUTE AT MILLIKEN AVEWE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-111-23.
A. Recitals.
(1) O'0onnell, Armstrong, Brigham A Partners has filed an
application for the approval of Development Review No. 88-36 as described in
the titre of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Development Review request Is refervd to as "the application".
(ii) On the 28th of December, 1988, the PlaR-.,Gg Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded
said meeting on that date.
(iii) All legal preWequisites to the aeopt on of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamong as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of tMs Resolution are true and. correct.
2. Based upon substantit.: evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on Decemm)er 28, 1988, including written
and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located on the south
side, of Arrow Route at Milliken Avenue with a front-qe of 2,167 feet along
Arrow Route. The property, is presently vacant.
(b) The property to the north, south, east and west are
designated for industrial uses. The property to the south and west is
developed with industrial bui?din4s. The property to the north is vacant.
The property to the east is partially developed with industrial buildings.
(c) The project, with the recommended conditions, of approval,
complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
PLAANING COMMISSION R�',SOLUTION 0. f
DR 88-36 - O'Donnell, Armstrong, Brigham & Partners
December 28, 1988
Page 2
(d) The development of the industrial complex is consistent
with the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial designation of the Industrial Area
Specific Ilan and the General Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs V and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed pi,Dlect is consistent with
the objectives of the general Plan; and
(b) That the proposed usr is in accord with the
objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and
the purposes of the district in which the site
is located; and
(c) That the proposed use is in covipliance with
aach of the applicable provisions of the
Industrial Specific Plan; and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the
conditions applic` !- thereto, will not bs
detrimental to the' pubiYti .health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with tho California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
'r Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planning Division:
A. Master Plan
1) The Master Plan is approved in concept only and future
development for each parcel shall be subject to
devel-gwnt/design review process for Planning Commission
approval. Modifications to the Master Pl -shall be
subject to Planning Commission approval.
2) Each parcel developed riithin the Master Plan shall include
individual plaza/open space areas.
t -,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR r7-36 - O'Donnell, Armstrong, Brigham & Partners
December 28, 1988
Page 3
3) At such time as any parcel develops, the developer shall
concurrently landscape the street frontage on the adjoining
lots along tha., street. The applicant 1 hall develop a
landscape concep. for the Master Plan. This concept shall
establish guidelb,is for streetscape design, property
boundary designs and maintenance, project identification
for major street corners as well as a plant palette for the
selection of parking lot shade trees, entry accents, etc.
4) A uniform program for security fencing, if any, shall be
provided with the Master Plan and is subject to the
approval of the Foothill Fire District and the City
Planner.
5) The Master Plan text and/or CC&R's for Parcel Map 11891
shall be developed to incorporate conditions Al through AA
and submitted for City Planner review and ;� aroval prior to
recordation of the Parcel Map or issuance of building
permits, whichever occurs first. The document shall
include guidelines for landscaping, rite planning issues,
shared access and architectural guidelines consistent with
the appropriate subarea of the. Industrial Specific Plan.
6) Variaelon shall be provided in the building and parking
setback; along Milliken Avenue and Af :w Route. The
setbacks shall be reviewed on future Bevelopment/4esign
Review applic4tions.
B. Phase I Development
1) The plaza areas shall be designed with a physical
separation from the entry areas. The final design shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the
issuance of building permits.
2) Doors shall be provided for buildings 1, 2, and 3 to
connect directly to the plaza araa . The final plans sha1;
j be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the
issuance of building permits.
i
Engineering Division,
1) The conditions of approval for Parcel Map 11891 shall apply to
the project. Therefore, Parcel Map 11891 shall be recorded
f prior to issuance of a building permit.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLlTION NO.
DR 88-36 - O'Donnell. Armstrong, Gotigham b Partners
December 28, 1988
Page 4
Building 8 Safety Division:
1) P.r,v* to the issuance of any permits, a detailed hydrologic and
;hydraulic study shall be submitted to indluAte how on-sits
reteti ion will K1 maintained below 12 inches In automobile j'
parking areas and 18 inches in truck parking areas. The study
shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official.
6. The Secretary to this C:"ission ihall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER,"1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION Or TNL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
i BY:
Larry T "Ft Niel, rhairoan
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, secretary
I, Brand Buller, Secretiary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, da hereby certify that Ciie foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting b'f the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of December, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES': COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COINSSIONERS:
` r
pCC Original l r Quality
0�..»ME Y9_c45i��` q.4�.ai.G ^ p{gO. GY Y ip�
3 Na w- ry.Y��L� NdN �oK�.
a i%£u�1o`1�'•L±.�°'.+V n .p���«S ^I9s e e6ti4 Na�+,.N2'dYS
Or.Qtu YVyy Y#p, 8 `Y CVtl i� Y
6r r�♦!!3 1� C M �Yy ti �y, V' O F ~.dC.w�. ��O i
6 _�v,4G'yy� qV•r ��YLq�i1�l' :�R �Y�•�$Mp �+yM qYM�
*�Tsc■"3A 11 ♦! '^may 4 � 6 M t Yam~ I N® a
N yy}�O 6y0 O'O.� 'C��1` �N yYn d371y'yyy =�yjyy^N�
Elko QOpCMMG 6r»1g1N( � y Yn.��S s^p 1v♦`>1.
NyYY aI��A4
■JN tl�NyNC+� Y+`►_^wppp es {+VL,r;, i^MN Cw++YYygyg3 »may
1.>�
V I ����W Y4 Y �y,1 i.] C YY tYl Y h as1?♦t
y I rp • o V M Rrt�.
$au�y s�"Cy� M•^�N+N � r,,� �1 per{ ^ 4C�
oe
I4 Y�LC �Qy+per
Y y� b p aaa$$$fff n _U 6 vY. yy
4 (4. yy�CC yyyy Y _�y ��a� o Y Y
ezig Q F940 �[ 'i M�. �. an - iI.to
Y W
Mi A
T6CM
S q Y M N N y Y 4Cp♦n
r as �r+
aq IN
U «"' y�1
$ ; .` ryy�e «
CIQYpC
a i 1 1 MYO�W1 �n 1
.. � � .� Vey�. � ♦tl a+Y
1 � _
y`
1 IR Y � "
y4 � 4 �pp r. �Y�N ».+C �
s
$ Ti �i 4 YU"Ziay
Ij
a I I 1
P bYP 0 y �
Y YY yyy.N Y•s PO a- p
YYN VBpoo
Y S U
� N Y Cig-p-zl' iq k
;T
� % �-I Mi«tlgig :jjk :
C X_ 3L� o� ,pi. Si h a.Y.LLj y P 3-4= c w. E
ayry���ca{ct Ls yp.Gy Ype �.,L.. s 1q:.
il
LY^cy+yN L Y11.w P�r{j±;.,� EY� I.. i •' L�P�• 'N u
7 .fY' AsNA 6r Y•a3M NUYwwy� , .4! oVO
b Y Y 'yuu^, 2 c�✓8 �C' !' 4 w p�
yYYY G C1 L�~�0 ��P�'��M+N �T��,1C�'p� �6�J • y.t'. �Y�A N�
�LIY.L Nw'�.N.� �YU6 CpY � ■L� Nq.+y
yY tl � � 'Mle _ �{ MPgYqwpMc�iy.
C [3_�G }iYy lyw M N P L Y+, M M H tl P s M O F•. N 6 ey S.6
p'N~ •HIV � pypN�jy�pY■yNy S �e CeO
Hd C �i� eN�P LLL INNQ O. Z.
��P$s M CY< YY Y`d C+'�$w•l� s�N
w �wwR 4 O Ya O 3
u
a$y"�ir
i, o Lot
^�ti �� .A� V�
Y t `N V} L i
(C) 3 L � YN 6y
O St
My~� �4' �1�. «• 'if^X-�77 V gMh '�Y�LLL
•.. ,�.Si O�a M 2 O ry i e i iyt• P a r g N y Y
Y N 9Y Y.M�' Is* �L G0og 04 �y� •� ���e �
ofw O t V�S .sP ! P i.1- R _ixw 13 Y� y aS 6 .i �W i .V.p®MYS gy
�MY LI �
N`� Aq E.� YL ~� �
S1 N-
SY
iC '^ .Ow 6". i Q 9P aPYM Tm
(, p� qy� q{, p.=jEZ�oQ� Y�^ O y'..C�r?i s�• G�OO Cp.N 1s4 x3mi `-11. 9G` I_ly '1 � N+NYSCi
Me
yam, SYfr 47w, N N _ c p
Y m Op Yf ^sew 7e�.QY. Y ��`11. e'Y ev�! Y Y �Y M �n"�►:yi
a ,yIII Y w• Y Y L r�y O O.pi `y A pQ g N 4'i►
A -. 3101
L � p ~�� N_ YQ'y k V • �0.6 !. .Q«43.a
p N N r• M l`[
Vp �►.� u � �p. CSC Y,ylyy
rYp Q E � �ypjlp� pw y
0 i1.O g y N O1 v P W O q : V N N 2 m_V,, ��S Gp�'I
�. I.0 y@ L
<acA �K7 tL-i ao. K�Z� NX#. s .� Y ,jN ti M ` Sao
�'
Poor Qualm+
«$�Ya
0y Y yqp
3i b O• ti G� Y^^^.0� 'O n.` I� PVQ� L CY�4O�.Y
`L NO� 1 � V CY.�CY7uwW YO C�a{3.
�b f 6
Us
L twigYa .
�' °N^�'�a54 -$13 j C q<pVIPA
6i 3SN L I� C •C O >^ w N.r �YI LL Ctl L.P.: O �
r<7wYY OVy^•* « n;; ���OO K..1.►r.Sw/l� OdO N oN Py CC
occ4gL UYQ EL{1 tl`r' t^e 2`; Y Y CC yy .YY.
CNR P� Y� P w OaM�O
OLiL
r�L' $ yt `oYY3c �pe CCo$ « '&r
P=C r OI C
C S o C Y
0v1 aL+' sY NAYL �r OP.is�$Ny xT
C.MO Spy C uY`O v MwL J`C.. Hm LOI w�r� w T�pL
u^• Y_O^+ N L�N Ib Y t Ltf V O N�M
�N4� r>+ OyyN�11 �>� i.OY Lpo"¢~L°'tONsO YYG6N O.a>.��0 oNl C`O�F.
��YNyo oPK, Ow eoc �"$ a'�ww'eeNr'.E°-�'�`SYY� w�^�>' py�I�L. *-CND■�y.�'3
p YL,1A = yCs MTC•-Nei.
d w ■w N �Y� r.
GG-wra L I 4Y4p.^ G
i ri�wY sw�L° aS6' rJ.Yi'� RCN xi� i. �^��� «" �.wo�
YYqq iyAYu P ��a!w .- ' CYCs� C
N�MYNN'Vrra W �Mdd �A�.Ya 4Y tLOwGN
1
ly
Y y q Y �1O
p '
yO s.y CCT M,l p■w Yp�wc
OP vp N`. tO pG p� 3Cy_�+` 'p CTP {I�>wu4a
VNw Np CS �
Y3 �2 �3 �N N ae 3YS3 rs°�i e' �Pe r�
Ly �^ P w c � pNw Yw1 Y 01�� WYMCY
oV0 O;.S•� B $■ �r M �� w��� c� Cp N�O NY 1Y`.iiQ Y
ch
CO 111
y��
L S3 ��■ ; Myp,
YlC CN V� � • V pr ��00 N-O L.�� Or Y
. y L
■UW yNy��{{•�� ai +P eYy ylN V�. g,O. Y M{ '�Y ?;,
Y y�g9ly
Ole V C Lr0 e�r. sY a4C w.. Y� pVYa�e°C LQa
-2TS 21A nwn =2 OU o°'� 12 Gam .N P4Y�Y®L
LwC LwL N ^�pV� id�am . VV^a-V uCCM>r'r°
G. p��. N V N C LWq EN. A V i w 7 a� 'tR.r. Y p O9P_ Y
Nw« w:ri V �` 6�y+ Np r N y
$ '� ado � c:—
3 P�.. a PC Y
z j we,:
'
' _
>ELgo _2aP f :� Pa P> YYL�ru Crs tq N pa
M N 6 <w�r 5 �.7 N t.6 U <H <® }..O N e• `G C <N W L 6 «
w L1
� N n
i
■�■�� .��N �5oa$�•3, Lam: � �'� .-nax � '�
V.-8 CAR' u d� y�i us 3.—O b vex —A.
u39aF Cyµ : Oli-iG r-=YB� L ep
Pin`� ipp� Y OkJ�f� Y�r1 yp a tY 4Y.S
yViy �. 9 U4'�.ti pp�� J. �Q.iC.sgYjwY LLai
Ail
Yp fppe.N aOR .0% �N AIRu�u■y� � M■C OQy »��� �VtY C G'
�¢6�y�/C0
0+s4
LN
CJy� � ��Y■ SN�1y qi. y V �
1. lyN y G 1 y. Y Mas
yyYM yy;; Lq u 4Mf/ ^s•�TYC > tiV1
�.Q f� ,C CCC aY� OV C h:Aµ =I`1�GlY
r t'q =.awy 4JYC <6 �M Yu+. yylyyc 'p yy��M fvi
YY �' C
r a w . q Py M «i..yw. K q +\ f
-+JMNaa
Cw 4.V.I� b 1c, V n 4 Y42 494"I T
m L.i "
gg. g �$ �u 3
3,2-r `«C ke aL'E.�7t46
y
G.f 6G op'' g A 0 wwC N N.iJ ! Cr� s
t C rdau+• Y a rY rC
ry `rrs ri Y r f a.OR. Y Y L u
wYC oft' �q( »®n-t Gw
$�U'� CC au
�p
C♦ L Y Y� � w�6 � Ll�N O Y` U—n
ayA u eCy � ;• Y Y 6 '� R u
y y p 'j3 sr C y■�
3ZA `Y}��
'iv«fT I$—« .,,a9?!Je 1
a1
'e. •� a�
Q•9{� '1 N N'. w rw,i� ytM I�yLQyqiN YY Y.ppppNwpp �� M�IY NM =rr� C'�LO,
tY;a}1� L f11 Y Y R�Oc �A Y. �Y lam. (Qry Nt p t wYyY.Y
J A � ft' cpJwp Y � LYob cNc p�=Y Q6 .6
3tAp'� y
G.—Of�w ` Ny Z3LVO k C yY
4�0 {1 'gamma SFYY .�. dirh q�J. .� �i ix.� .• �lO • CtY.
VVw ra= ,� R YQqyL s� «r 31 +.'r•.
Oi~�6 d • a Y Va�Y p� w AyY Q fj a`. tpp4 w 1�� L~
ZI-f 6 a.C g
9f C7 .�!
NO.
p•p +�-�`«r �&g'$" o�p's.'� y'y," txto' Na,$
M
Y U Y CCRIII
�..a.. <aw�.! 1H. alix k �
` �rAO +O�CSE ��V •C I � G C N04G V
� 666 qJ tl �3
bp
S L V YcccO~ NEB � � H � 3 wO G
� G Ct�� 7.� Y~C# 00�p 9 ti A y C 4� Ny
G « � t V s ;C =' L V OA^ a
G�{ pY t CQL ^ 86 a u TiV
�Yr
C Y. y A Yp! LY i O L
YO.o ^21--
Z.
zl
4 d2^� „2
C^^O ^N30Y.���1� � �vv�L �q��y O � �M � U� q 3/ �Y^'
aC/UYCS 01»' YA9N as 82 N C�« ,Y~
yy 11 �s gg t
a"c«I E3
o _
Lt1
gg 1
1A 0 c OR
+$w
0•� �� ^ j � Mp� Ld !! YY�Y Jii'MYg. 4M+Y
02 sill
w_w gg erg- L «gyp YO! M
i. '�g' W ZeY '3Y�jj 'sv g
O �V y�y�" 4w '33 @` A�yM�$�l dam. p�Y CYYyY� �Uq� ppYypr
�Z Oy � � C S iqY^q 0� `p Y_N• .30! Yq.r'4$
«a' �p y r P N yG g w O�5 N s6 N M
s S■$ �'>�{'aOS''i� �s�G73 •'��+N30� �Q g � 1N�
�C ay� �MLpwL {.•� OO (ps. .1�V.fN� q0 +
yL�� KO O `Mp q'M�arY Z Y N pyf e Y
'+Z IL
Z. N.M if C. Yk1 Q LVF
0 � O O 0 ippo �o O�
VYOY
SBIY. ^ �.^ ` pi YN p ^I V GCCCb las �,�Og�,{y�j C
�yN�p4q�
^A O Y ^ 4 6` VVI iT�i L �• '2 a 2.30 M��. NCO M04
a a8 o3N� d :22—k
qq ss y `
CTE wp C1" CiwS ^"S .9 V.4� Mq. (y�iqp CKQ „A
N..^gg 42 f ,Lq vy KY L OEM p Lu vV viK gAC9C OCw art
u uS'3i t$ a SHE <
u4 4
i
� AY �9
"`pD. W i99i 6 N OMMNs
ie �LJu
OYQ� •gV GN.
C 6■■ t qA i^r =� P =Z*N « •Ns sA rd
{Y�YV. �
LV AYY i� t�
Ky`q �1 '6 Etl Yr
I
� 1a^
i Lp7 SY pLS NM V{
�` po 1 ye MtO� 4 CVy 6 bf
+ CYO u
R o`L'� n �� e 01N CN " tlY
y CC f. 6
U.
tl NC
Eg
Y `�' �' w b o Q E a■p+ �'y \g,p6� � o [+r �. L��Y' YC��9
ski
6 QW Ly _LMQo■Yq4 b rS y �/ Y
■S +^W Y M V fIS 06� 1- HL V O VgL.q VYG.
gp uu��$ � N-- ? 1q sr y '+Sidi s 1"'�1
�\'^u.M YYY LCi Mw Nan.yWyI NN :
Y.�YgYV L�y, O:.tl ^Y �6 RL4�L�YYY.Y 'yN tl L 'L.tq OOY
Ak
�1Ae �YY�A GY
C Y N M G L V�e 3 SY
pgsA01 Lwn
� a g =Gs' pL N
Ytl N CCLpp��Y^
�Y }��1 y s
Y ^ Eby Q�' y lyYO
` 94 Vai Mp q w� Z ILsfj
S }
y� r� p■v! _4� iQ.. � �. i.wOp� Owe
GQuil 'N� yyi+®+came pp=�r�ll y6y \ �NFIOr \ � j 4`w''YBB 41 ��is
4N. q
r■CC ` �y 4 Mpp wy V i
QC
YF i CN C `w ? 60 `� q
3-7
K ` W7 L v7tl <b V W�. ,` hjy, O Attj NL' W� i6W
F 1 4�
Cft
s a h),Rl Poor oumit
X.
O V V
Y u
Y m w
Na Y'u_
a c
Y O'
s
O y o 0
NeYe 4�G
CCY G{i� Zo.ya
�A h
O 1.4
C(� o y C90Y MC� c 1,0
�Va�s YyyL iiOA S Mtl Y K O+`A C•MY 00
;� L y■L u 6
O+y 4 `91J y (��1► �f�nS�yV TYYYM
r�eff ;6 CaCj,� �a = y�JL p Y �. W(�� jzL _ag
Y p #■ O Y a LO S V 6 Y yL yC W CQ L 0
L C O L y�•i��a b L L p�0 CQyY `L AYO CC e ey�0
Y aa ytl
4yyo4 yM Z —4.' C Y. eysL
O 'awl �r�y Y Y a a Y m�
q `p •� YY Gi4 tV
^0`V O 61i.�•�0 6 `�4 YLY «�i0
C_Q y0 YNip Y. yN L�Q NN 1y� yo NO NC
^ .� sy� �pJ` IL N�Lw 1� V.t0J1 • iOY O ; u�Y.
M-5 7 Y O L V A. y.?1 y L Y 1. N GY v6 v p�,�.�L ^'W `6
ZZ
Ly MI NC yNOY�y' YO a 'QN +N ` ^p S yO/Ja S=v
01y W yO` '� yfl�'
IS
y^ aG�q LO 2_�r �'� L C 6q0 yyyy YN yM N
y� y 4 �pp N y Y ^ a W Gay IL'tl Wyf^ 0.st C4 C a Cw 1YuJy p� y� 0 C
9± 4,<Lli �
N �
-- — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �. r
STAFF REPORT
.i
DATE: December 28, 1988
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Seninr Civil Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: ENYIRONMEF.TAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11891
?� - A ivision of acres
o an nfv24 parcels in the II�n `mime Impact Heavy Industrial
designation (Subarea 9) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on.
the south side of Arrow Route at Milliken Aveaue - (APN 229-111-23)
I. PROJECT AND SITE 3FSCRIPTION:
A. Action Rtzuested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as
shown on Exni- "SO
c. rsnvY Size:
24 Parcels
Ranging in size from 2.0 acres to 13.8 acrez.
C. Existing Zoning:
Minimum Impact Heavy
Industrial District
D. Surrounding Land Use:
Nerth - Vacant
South - Existing IndustMal and vacant land
East - Existing Industrial atM vacant 'land
West - Existing Industrial
E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations:
North - General Industrial, subarea 8
South - General industrial, subarea 10
East - Minima Impact Heavy Industrial, subarea 9
West General Industrial, subarea 8, and Minim Impact Heavy
Industrial, subarea 9
ITEM C ,
PLAMING COMKISSION STAFF REPORT
T£NTATM PARCEL MAP 11891 - O'DONNEL4, APHSTRO6, BRIGH Mi& PARTNERS
DiCEMBER 28, 1084
PAGE 2
lip
F. Site Characteristics;
The site is vac?.nt containing only natural vegetation.
II, ANALYSIS:
The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create 24 parcels for industrial
development. Development plans for six (6) of those parcels are on
tonight's Planning Commission agenda as DR 68-36. A Rzster Plan showing
the future development of the remaining lots has also been submitted as a
part of DR 88-36.
There is one unresolved issue associated with the project, that being the
size and depth of the onsite drainage retention areas. This issue is
discussed in the staff report for OR 88-36.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, TM applicant completed Part I of the V itial
;-gaff -conduc,ad a field investigation and completed Part II of
the Initial Study., No -dverse impacts upon the cnvironnscnt are
anticipated as a result of ttris project. Therefore, issuance of Negative J
Declaration is appropriate.
IV. rORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public ifearing have been sent to surrounding
proper owners and placed in the Daily Report Neaspaper. PostiP4 at the
site has also been completed.
V. RECOMMERDATION: Staff recommends that this item be continued for two
weeks o a' a more detailed 4nalysis of the drainage issue alwg the
!; southern portion of the site. If additional information is provided and
the problem is resolved, a resoluticn of approval has been included for
adoption.
Respectfully submitted,
let
Barrye R. Hanson
Senior Civil Engineer
f BRH:BK:dlx
V Attachments: Vicinity Aap (Exhibit, "V)
Tentative Map (Exhibit "B">
Resolution and
Recommended Conditions of Approval
e
ACUY OF rfM- PARZEL. MAP 11 L9 t
'RANCHO CUCMMONGA . Viuml-N MAP
-3
TENTATIVE C kRCEL MAP NO.11891
IN TN[CITY OR NA WN0 Ca1CA"W"!OONTT Of MN M11111AACINO.[TA"ON 4NLW( WA
faM aaN.Maa at a,N,N•aa,NI11aN I.FN•tM i pl,,fa yt»ay.}aN,1.
.Mla•IaR.Y Nw>M, MwFua..K•K./aF�INsa,aM,f}.
111"Mx{CN.Awl schtla
Cwlw.nl!wx tlwNw!A.I u1N!w,!)!At'
Amu 1w" 4101111aLC V.OLDIN NC Lt.itirt.
_ ^ 84 _VARC[h 9-110.3a`ACA[8-M'FT 1 W 1.0!ACRl3'-Cl1C[rr! `
t '/MCl(Lffi 1iC.T. •I i��Ri'7!�r' �?�Kr�a`+ 'nY �' sr . ' ��
1AMR ti' ►AMCR"..t - FARM }} 1 I R tAC is 1AACR!
.•tWIQp K, {{�, -�3�,,,yyy(((��-��_ i �IyY�a, SYJK '.
7.
�. '...NL •*{�� ISF'if•t.'^. _ I�f� �1/4'}.•' 1.leif' �
IN
3Y16 IA,K`ft tr . .. rN. '
�saYC{4 A !.: t ••
• �• 1NN: � 4
t ►;Y",lot",lot ►AIIQII•Ir l
' 1 ►A11CK t 1 1 .
i - ratlsfR li'
'.ASM'St.'
�:1 •fm': > a sty it. �V•r.+4e. -
f aw! LI
E
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF 'rHE PLAh.:.d^2 CU41ISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING
TENTA'PIyr PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11891, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTIM O£'OF ARROW ROUTE, WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT'THEREOF - (APM '29-111431 ,
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel MAp Number 11891, submitted by O'Donnell,
Brigham, Armstrong b Partners, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing lito ,
24 parcels, the real pi.operty situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County
of SLn Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s,) 229-111-23,
located on the southside of Arrow Rout:, west of Rochester Avenue; aad
WHEREAS, on December 28, 1938, the Planning Comission held a duly
advartised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS;
SECTION le. That the folle4ing findings have been made:
1. That the map s consistent with the %-,"ral Plan
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is oVsically suitable for the
proposed developmenf-
4, That the pr„r lad subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
heFlth problems or have adverse afferts ce abutting
property.
SECTION 2; This Commission finds an4 certifies that the project has
been reviWQ3'and-considered in compliance with the Californ.� Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereb; issues a Negativo
Declaration.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11891 t,' hereby approved
subject. BF—£ne aattached Standard Conditions and t:j following Special
Conditions:
i
l
PALANNING COMMISSION RESu,.UTiON NO.
PM`11891 - O'DONNELL, ARMS[RONG, BRIG M b PARTNERS
DECEMBER 28, 1988
PAGE 2
Special Conditions
1. Existing Overhead Utilities
(a) Arrow Route - Ttza existing overhead utilities (electrical and
telecommunic1tions) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be
undergrounded from the first pole offsite east of the project
east boundary tea the first pole offsite west of the project west
boundary, prior to public improvement .acceptance or occupancy,
whichever occurs first. The ft eloper may request a
reimbursement, agreement to recover one-half the City adopted
cost for undergrounding from the future development
(redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street.
(b) Communication lints within the A.T. 3 S.F. Railroad right of way
- An in-lieu fee ds contribution to the fuVAre undergrounding of
the existing overhead Railroad Communirition lines shall be paid
to the City, prier to approval of the Inal Parcel Flap. The fee
shall be one-half the City adopted urrt amount times the ier4gth
of the project frontage.
I
(c) Communicatlt�— for 66 K.V. electrical - An in-Lieu fee as
contribution to the future underground+nq of the existing
overhead utilities (communications for 5 K.V. electrical
located within the Southern California Edison Fsement: south of
the project south boundary shall be paid to the City prior to
approval of the Final Parcel Map. The fee shalt be cnt,a.-half the
City adopted unit amount times thn length of thr, project
frontage.
2. The developer shall Obtain a license agreement for the A.T. a S.F.
Pailroad and construct the railroad grade crossing withA n Jersey
Boulevard at the west project boundary. The construction shall include
crossing guard gates acid rubberized pads. The developer may request
reimbursement agreements to recover one-half the cost of the grade
crossing from the properties on the west ;tide upon their revelopment
(redevelopment).
3. Drainage/flood protection facilities r-hall be provided for the project
area to the siNtisfaction of the City Engineer as follows.
(a) The project area shall be protected from a Q100 from the area
north of Arrow Route.
(b) The runoff (Q100) fn,,m the site, including any runoff fr:.a the
area norM of Arrow itoute, shall not exceed the cala-Aty of the
existing public storm drain :Ysten to the south.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
PM 11891 - O'DONNCLL, ARMSTRONG, B.1IGNAM & PARTNERS
DECEMBER 8, 1488
PAGE 3
!'e) A interim berm, ditch; arid retention basin system shall be
provided on the norO, side of Arrow Route to control flows from
the area to the forth.
(d) ARy interiuiA retention ba:;ins that are not designed with a free
fl ow outlet, shall have sufficient caparity to contain a
sequence 9-100 year storms. A gated gravity or pump system
shall be provided to drain the basin daring off peak flow hours.
(e) A meckanism shall bt provided for the maintenance and tb,•
funding thereo.' of the interim drainage facilities by some
entity Cher than the City with a provision that the City be
allowed access and cost reccvery for maintenance if necessary.
(f) Easewjnts for tin-site drainage retention areas shall be
delineate( and inundation rights dedicated on the Final Parcel
Map. The retention areas shall be designed to limit the maximum
ponding depth to 12 inches and 18 inche4 in parking and
manuvering areas for automobiles and trucks, respectively. No
public water shall be tributary directly to the on-site
retention areas.
g) The Developer shall obtain an easement for the drainage
facilities on the north side of Arrow Route prior to approve'. of
the Final -'arcel Map or the facilities shall be construc.zd'
wiihin the bomdarier of this Parcel Map within an appropriate.
easement.
(h) A plan identifing ;nteriur end permanent drainage facilities
shalt be provided to and approved by the City Enginetr.
4. The developer shal provide a sight line study for the intersection of
Milliken Avenue and Ji sey Boulevard.
a. Parkway improvements my be c;'eferred until the development of the
adjacent parcels, except as otherwise required for the area master
plan.
6. Non- ehicular access rights shalt be dedicated to the City on Milliken
Avenue, Arrow Route and Jersey Boulevard except for approved driveway
locations. The driveways shown on tto tentative map along Milliken
Avenue and Arrow Route are acceptable; however, those along Jersey
Boulevard shall be relocated to meet City sparing standards. The mast
westerly driveW on the south side of Jersey Boulevard shall be
removed.
1. Right turn lanes thall be provided for all driveways on Milliken Avenue
and Arrow route and on the south Side of Arrow Route at the
intersection of Milliken Avei.ue.
PLANNING COMMUSION RESOD t3TION HO.
PM 11091 < O'AONNEL w ARMSTRONG, BRIGHAM A PARTNERS
DECE48ER 28, 088
PAGE 4
8. Easerants for joint use driveways shall be provided on the ''cal Parcel
Map or by separate nstrument prior to approval of the Mnal Parcel
flap.
9, The total area equired to construct, ilia Milliken Avenue/railroad
undercross..g A-,,pluding parkway slopes, top of sl-ope access areas, etc,
shall be ,iedZrtlal to the City as s%.rett right of way.
f W A setback area shall �,e provided for A ihoefly (railroad detour) if ore
is necessary as determined by the design of Vie undercrossing.
` 11. The area required for the relocation of tho railroad spur alorg the
;authwest boundary of the site shall be dedicated in fee to the A.T. &
t S.F. Railroad.
12• Tho developer shall construct 38 feet of pavement on the north side of
the centarline of Arrow. Route. Tha developer may request a
reimbursemant agreement to , cov%' the ,cast -4tht constructlo4ol of -t'le
pavement from the wvgerty tr, the north. u , ritveloprm3At.
13. The lands,,ping for the Milliken Avenue sredien island and parktways
sf,all confrem to the City Landsca�ing Master Pan a% approved by the
City Engineer.
Am
14. A goad faith effort shall ke We to obtain an ,dditioml 7 feet of
street dedication for (fie half widW street (Street "^,") along the east
project boundary, north and south of Jersey Boulevard from the property
Owners to the east (APN 229-1"-5,, 6 and a) prior to aprt`oval of the
Final Parcel Map.
16. The developer shall make a good fait:} effort to obtain the necessary
w{ght-of-ray and constrict curbs gutter, pavement and a drive Approach
on arrow Route from the easterly project.a houndary to the easterly side
of the first exi3ting drive approach to the satisfaction f the City
Engisaer. Thri developer may request a reimbursement agi4etmrent to
recovEr the cost of tonstructUm.-those street improvements from future
dev. aiwent/rxdevelopment ar- it occurs east of tiie project site.
16. f a determination is made by t, a plannitrg Commisnion that the parcels
north of Jersey 8oulevaro are to be rail served, the developer 0&11 be
responsible for the tonstruction of the railroad grade -crossings
including gates and r0barize4 pads.
17. Previously approvee-Tentative Parcel fop No. 881$ shall be rescinded by
the approval of i,4s Tentative Parcel lap.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 110.
aM 11891 - -WWWAEUt 'ARMSTRONG, BRIGHhM & PARTNERS
r0., 1988
PARE J
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF DELaVER,I988.
PLANNING COBI+MISSION OF THE CITY OF RAWWO CUCAMONGA
BY,
Larry T. Mcmiel, 3 r*a'� a
ATTEST:
'Brad Buller, secFe-tary
1, Brad Fuller, Secretary of the Planning Coi;Aissi,)n of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certity, that the foregoing Resolution was -duly and
regularly introduced, passed, sand adopted by the Manning Comission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of December, 1988, by the 'Mlc;ting vo* -to-w',t:
AYES: COMMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMiISSIONERS:
I
i
�j
f
Poor Qual
y
s
�� �'� ,5'^�t�� ..�'� �•�r ,AFC' }}}��� � i:.�f x�
W r •Y,
n _ JI
�3 N ►�.e
as-is 1t 3=
A � `
r • � <L S+
i '1 , 1% g » AI`M a 12 a r~r
V ^ N
flr'f"y� ��' vs� y�u 'q�♦i' at"
3ail
�4 6►z y�qZ Z v nS
w
j
I
us;
AX—
d ~"�
43
fa V�
c N. 11► A y` s
_ r
4
is Ztl;
i
1 fie
` $ awrT` S.K�ru
I�
". aCt wLY � a3
olk
'^ it ri 4 Yi r
s