No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/03/14 - Agenda Packet 0 :44 4 C u 1.1 � * � F 1 jkk!!4C!1d C NEDNES,D Y : MARCH'-14;1990 ;00 p rtii LIONS P (K' GMMNITY CENi'ER ri o 9161 BASELINE :` O RANCHO CUCAk40 tt, N6A, CE6LIFORNIA +1 , L Pledgee of Alitgiance. F IL 9011 Call: R't Commis's?oner Blakesley,_ Commissioner. McNiel Commissioner `Chitiea _ Co n ssioner Tolstpy ` Commissioner Weinberger JIL, Announcements, Approval of qinutes''` � February46,'1990. V- ';'Public Hearings The ©I1owtrg tte!M are public hearings Ln'u ich concerned individuals rrffi1 ,voice their opini'd&of,_the 'related Project ' Please unit to be recognized.by. the.Chainmri--and address the Carmission., Y stat:ang your• rum and address:. Ail suci aptnions shalt p Zimited'to 5rrdnutes:`per ipdividuaZ for eoch_i project. Please sign in-al ter speaking..;' f A. VARIANCE_ 9042 - YDISARIO A' request to ,allow `the construction, Of a 5-foot, 6-#nch:solid black wall within the front _yard setback'of a lot ;wtthih the Very Low Residential District. ('1 2 dwelling qn.i:ts per boated at KISS ,Iasper.;.Street - APR, 1061-221 32�. , B VARIANCE .90-01: - VERA� ; A request} eta allow the construction of. a house to,,,pneroach into the' 'required interior.:sIde yard setback by ` teet for a singI family r r � residence_ locate. in��the fort ,Hential .District ��(2 1.4 ; dwelTIng ' units nee . acre)'..at 817. Feron-. Boulevard, RP I 209-063 03,iA�; C 1;� C. 'AbD4F,1CATI0N.TO CONDITIONAL„ USE,PERMIT 87-2f SANDERSOI RAY & PETRY/OAS.- The request .to rehabil- tate the existing.: 10,,570 square-foot winery building sand 7E3 square foot stillbuilding for office, retail, and restaurant uses with��n the . i'„omas Wfhbyy_ Plaza, in the Special§ Commercial District .of the Fpothi i-ice 3oueyard ,Specific Plan,; •located ,.:at the- northeast cornel;l pf,E,,Fop;th�;lcl:. Boulevard and 4 --myard Avenue - APR .`-208 10 � r�nctA" D.. P!d'ASING` PLAN .FQR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT•88=I2 WESTERN PROP RTIES .;request t o' modify. the ,phasing, plan for � , i Terra; -Vista Towne-Center loca-ted at tMe northeast corner of Haven,Avenue and Foothill`-BoWevard AP b; 1077-42145, 069 and 18 ` F. MODIFIG1l1ION TO DEVELOPMENT .REVIEW. 38 Ol 'AND. TENTATIVE 'PARCEL 'MAP 11341 - LEWIS HOMES MA AGFMENT _CORP A - request to defer the :completo'n of'`;he Maliken Avenue: median lendscaping :for the Aevelopmt� mf a,mdaical�center` on 10�`acjes 'f I" i A'n�the.Mixed US�'�-(MHD) District-_withins +' tfie Werra ista. `Planned.";Coa�munity, vacated at :the; southeast`gorier af.Milliken.:Avenue, and ChuncYr Street ' L; APN:` 227-151-13 and 14, a' ' F. ' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC-PLAN AMENDMENT,: 0 01.�'CITY OF`. RANCHO' 'CUCAMONGA. request to: amend the_ Foothill' Boulevard Specific 'Pl.a'n by adding' pFiarmacy use �n ttie Specia4 ty, Commercial. District of Subareas 1, t2, and 3';" . cla hying the intent of wording_in ,several areas; of the: ` text for consistepcy purposes; clarifying the de,velopmeiit d;istric `.`and standards for the °.area at the. 01 ;;of_ San Bernardino .Road`',in, Subarea 2; and: modifying the .plant palette' .for the Foothill , Boulevard landscaped median -is and: G. -AMENDMENT TO ENTERTAINMENT: PERMIT:OPDINANCE N0. 29D. - CITY OF RANCHO= 000AMONGA - An amendment-:to :Chapter 5.12. of the ? Municipal Code :modifying `re'gulationS .fOY� entertainment permits. YI. OId ®usinets` 4 H. `POLICY DIRECTIVE FOR MINIMUM LENGTH OFMEClAiV 'ISLANDS WITHIN THE CITY . VIY. Director°s Reports14 .�r I: POLICY DETERMINATION'.TO CL`ARI ..THE 50 ODO .SQUARE. TOOT GROSS .FLOOR AREA'.., :OR .LIGHT 'WHOLESALE' STOR GE AND OIT•RIBU?I^NPE,OF'USE IN-THE -INDUSTRI L:,SP-.ECIFIC PLAN . AREA j}} J AB '93g,:LEGI�LATSON l ` vul, C v*usian BuS�ness puhl i e;Cpaunents This theirr*T q e �y place, fGr"_the general_pufii c to address the 6=77 6Siok, `•Items >to be discussed hgre Pe 'th`6 .,Ohich do,' no already appear.on this agenda.:: �,'^ _ WK ourn Adj kt nt The Planning .4=Ls8 on ai�. that Bet an,11 v nt ad jblic r ant t 16 I f i temp go beyond that 'they $hall`-be heard on7 ,' urith 'the _,consent -.of ttce: rCYsttnission _ 3 i} to 1 � Y ,7 9= Ni. � f 1 t t } { rz ;j z SAN �v OAK NOV fly ski Q A TO Mon AV ��' c ' ' ti J vrW ,j� Psi A, Asoa 17 fe � n e . VIANIT as It I ta®rai mi ss ol. ® fiC �E a -ellf Nai6 ice ' 00 Siam 16 P� G to.e0isa�•0ulbn`e0uwfr'pi�C9at •ajd'� _ IQf��I��4BLIh'$116 114'iAOT f.; tI 41 .I h i r t REEaVEi— J, March 14. i . 1�90 � �s90 Planning Dept:., City of Rancho Cucamo'nga Please be advised that S wish'to be put on 'record as opposed to the block wall that is`-being; constructed.at the Disario/ Tf. Curtis residence. The,value of the homes An our area are in;the range of $300,000.4700,000., -'The cotbination of this'. ugly block wall with ali their vehicles parked all over-the street in front of,then house-Is, -nr_t> conducive 'to the.area., Almost all homes in'the area have ;nicely iandscaAed. front t yard areas with either 'low or no walls. Wet wisK`,�o see the area maintained that way which is obviously the way the city feels if he has to aet a variance to ,get. this done:. Thank you for taking the,time,to listen, o our position. t y do want to go on record that if you allow this wall to be built that it is.mandatory that he drain to the street not to the sidewalk as you have allowed aS his other wall which drains into our garage), Thank you. ww `w a. Sharron Varga DOP Guthrie 5255 Jasper $t. �I Alta,Loma, Ca:, 91101 ^r. 3. • `CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.aVIONGA STFF 'Ll r` DATE: March 14, 1990t TO: Cha-irmah.and'Members of the planninq Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner° f BY: Tom-Gratin,, Assistant "Planner '. SUBJECT: VARIANCE 90-02 - DWRI0 - A request to ailow the construction _of-a.5-foot, .b-inch,golidblock wa .T Within t` the front ,yard setback. of a `lot within the-,Very. Loan ,. Residential District. dwelling units. per acre), located'at 5255 Jasper Street - APR►: I062-291-32 I. ABSTRACT: The Variance regve'st is to allo►W for ''the construction ` 'of a solid 'masonry wall' to"be located along`a portion i,Zie front , property line 12 feet. behind the'curb face. -The wa.L1.yjryl be used to screen'recreationa�l veh�in.7es an horse"'corra'rs, to'psotect the yard from illegal -dumping-of trash, and'to enclose the yard :to prevent' people from d�oturbin'g the property owner!s•.pets -(see Exhibit ,�A")., 1I. BACKGROUND: The design��and -layout of the`parcel.'(tee Exhibit 'QB") is such that the front F�roperty I ne `wrapi'around°:the corner of La Senda Road and 'Jasper,•. Street, .extending south': onto Jasper Street. The side 'lot line`s ran9e from `145 feet,to,235 feet; however, a portion of the tot reduces +to approximately 87: feet wide because of the design, of the parcel.- Local equestrian trail and drainage easements run along the rear property ,l,ine and a local equestrian trail easement-'runt along the northerly side property line.' The parcel contains' approximately 48,24C� square feet and has 293.45 lineal feet of.street .frontIge, An .existing single family residence is located adjacent to the south property line, yet the majority of the parcel located north of the house: is' Vacant. The applicant has constructed a 3-foot solid.masonry gull with 3 feet of wrought iron at the front 'property line-in front .of the existing residence. III. ANALYSIS: The Development Code does have`proviaions• -for the placement of °a wall at the front property ..I ine, .however, the limitations are very'specific. The Code Limitations are intended to prevent development of a "walled-in" .community: This'.is s; v: particularly . true 'in the Alta; Loma='area with 'its . ru1l character. Section 11 09.060.J,3. of the Development Code states.. ITEM 'A PLANNING COMMISSION'-STAFF REPORT VA 90-02 - DISARIO March 14, 1990 Page 2 a s; 'A combination of solid and open fences wrought iron., chain, link} ..not ;to exceed. 6 feet in height may be located- in'"a,required, front yard°,` corner side ;yard or visibility clearance -area, 'rpr.-oyided such' -fences: are constructed with at least,90 )ercent.of•the. top .3 feet, of, their vertical surface open, and'non-v_ ew obscurrno: Variance applications must consider code restri"ctions and whethor ' or not a hardship exists _that would prevent the property owner from building-according to established code requirement:, " Exhibit "C" shows existing easements and the front and. side :ad'.setback, . ,k lines which help i.n:determining the net'6uildati]e area; hoWeyer, additional building coverage require wtl7 apply.,:?Reviet::=of the buildable area :indicates;: sufficient+, depth would 'exist. for future'structures, :approximately 27 feet at t'te narrowest point; if the solid masonry wa11•were constructed at thp., ont'huilding, setback' requirement, which is 42 feet behind the.;curb face., i In terms of neighborhood compatibility; the ._construction of a solid 'masonry wall,_ at the' front. property-.C', ine ,;`would be inconsistent with the street`. character established by " tFie placement of adjacent residential structuress iAlthough' no adjacent ,resid,ences would actually front_onto"the proposed wa, no other properties in the vicinity have a aolId 6-;foot high_ masonry wail located along the front propehty,li.ne., , .' IV, REQUIRED FINDINGS: Before granttng ,a` Variance, the Planning Commission shall make ail of the f ollowing findings. Rny finding in the negative would preclude approval'af'the varianee ;requeSt. is A, That strict'or 13teral into •preta.tion and.enforcement' of the' specified regulations would .result"in practical, difficulty"or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with tho'objectivas of ,the Development Code. B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary `circumstances=or conditions applicable, to the property involved or to, the intended;use of he property that do not ap'ply,genera7iy'to the.other `properties in ;the same.district.' C. That strict or literal"interpretation?and+enA rcement di-the" specified regulation would deprive theapplicant.of°privii7eges enjoyed 'by the owners: of other properties, in ;ahe•.:"same district: ;; f` PLANNING,CpN�NiZSSION.'STAF� REPORT VA- 96=02 DISARIO � March;14,' 1990` Page 3 U. That the granting of ,the Variance `,will not constitute a .grant spec,al privilege. inconsistent"with. tie. l.imitationss' on other properties classified in the same district !n E That the granting of the Variance wi,Il not`be detrimental," IIIto. 5 the; public .heal_th, safety, �or_ welfare;or materially', l'njut�a`ous to, phupertes or mpr-ovements in 'the,vr'cinity Y V. RECQMMENDATION Staff recommeods° that .the Planping xCommisson de h,e.Variance thr �adoption. of the'atta ution. } Respectfully submitted', ! ' Brad Buz r City Rlanner BB•.TG ap -�1 Attachments: Exhibit Locat Letter froia the A ltc;?tnt E;chbit. "B" i on:Ntap PP .Exhibit C° Site Plan Exhibit "D" Npplicant's Plan Resolution`of`Dena,l � f Y 4� i (i+ F Tf i ,S t r 3 r r l 1cu,A - _.thy - �► �---'cam y^�c�__-t-��,.1 ��,��. _ ol co ® A- .a - .��; r c t � 3 � as 20 @' w 24 e 4372 Sr6b 839v F '90 .y4 cow-Doc t X 4gc7 SM 4397 e 30: M 4 ��iiyGG_a,�s1 .:.as It - K ymj A I.Gq j 7J3 f CITY OF N o-C3Ii,`1�1 IONGA PLANN G DrMION a� • d+ `cos®®®�r�11►; ' �rr,�rrr�r® ®®r®rr®®•rr rr•®®�®e►ro• y Q: a r^� J �; *1113 r 1 E fit\ i_ Cam" C, _ c C Cc%h r4 RESOLUTION NO. tit A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF i - + RANCHO CUGR,'AONGA, ,CALIFOFCMIA, bENYING VARIANCE -NO. 9042, A REQUEST<7p ALLOW THE CONMUCT.'ON OF A 5-F00T,= 6�INCH BL SOLID OCK WALL WITHIN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK.LOCATED'AT 5255' JASPER.,STREET IN'THE VERY 'LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-4> DWELLING UNITS. PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREQF� APN: 1061­22I A. Recitals, (i) Thomas Oisario has .filed art application for the issuance of Variance No. 90-02 as described in-the title of this Resolution. He in this Resolution, the ;subject'Variance request is referred to. as "the application", ( i) On March'14, 7'9901 the.Planning•Commission of t►,e City-of.Ranaho Cucamonga conductA-M'r" a duly-, noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said 'hearing on,that date.. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of thfs� Resolution ' have occurred. , B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE,;" it is .hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the, ity of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This' Comnission hereby specifically finds that all of the -facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2;.•. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered, in compliance with. the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and finds the project to be Class 1 Categorically.Exempt. 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented to ssion during the above-referenced public hearing on March,14, 1990, _ncluding.written.and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,, this Commission hereby - specifically finds as follows: - (a) The 4pplftat'OnL applies to property, located at 5255 Jasper Street with a street frontage of 293.45 feet and lot depth ranging 'from 146. feet to 234.59 feet and is presently improved with one (1) singl;e family residence; ;and (b) :All adjacent:parcels, nave been developed with single family residences and are located ,Within the Very Low'Residentital-Disteict; and .` PLANNING COMMISSION P.ESOLUTION';} VA 90-02 - DISARIO, March 14, 1:990 Page 2 (c) The application contemplates the construction of a 5,-"Foot, 6-inch solid; rrasonry.wall along Approximately 200 feet of the front property c, line, contrary to-the requirements that said Wall be.constructed at or'behind the front setback line of' 42 feet measured from the 'curb face, as stated in Section 17.0E.060.J.3 of the Rancho Cucamonga,Development Code. (d) The Variances as specified in the application,'would contradict the objectives of the .Rancho Cucamonga Develibpment Code. More specifically, the application as proposed would'be materially detrimental to thl persons'and property in the immediate vicinity for ' he following reasons; i) The neighborhood surrounding' the subject site consists largely of residential uses with large setbacks and open yard areas. 'No other property in the neighborhood has� simiiar walls located *1thi►r the frnnt setback area. ii) The application as submitted woui&be incompatible with the neighborhood's rural .character. The subject property and surrounding neighborhood are designated 'as an Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, enjoyment(of the epar el with re is ithe n5-foot 6-inch soli masonry wal for use and l constructed at the front.setback line. Auk 4. Ba =_d upon the substantial evidence ;,presented ,to this Commission during the above-referenced public hear�n and upon nt 9 p he 3pec3fic find in s of facts set forth in g - pargraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Camnassion hereby finds and concludes as follow's: (a)' That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would not result in practical difficulty or uftecessary J physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development_Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not;apply;generally to other propertieshin the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.. (d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the .limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance Will be detrimental; to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially 3'all injurious to properties or improvements in the Vicinity. x.fir' t a 4 -'RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTIOV, OF THE PLANNING. COMMISSION OF THE CITY .OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, `.CALIFQRNIA, DENYING`VARIANCE NQ; 90=02,�.- A .REQUEST:TO ALLOW THE-CONSTRUCTION''OF q,5-FO07;,b-INCH SOLID,BLOCk'WALL WITHIN�,THE FRONT YARD:'SETBACK LOCA7E0'AT . 5255 JASPE(l;STREET IN THE VERY LOW. RESIDENTIAi..DISTRICT (1-2' DWELL":5 UNITS PER ACRE),` AND .PiAKING,FINDINGS IN SUPPORT.,TH'citEOe'- iPN: ,1061-223`-32. A. Recitals t� (i) Thomas Ofsario bas. filed an application' far the,1sstande of Variance No, 90-02 as'.'des&ibed )n, the title (if`this Resolution. ; Hereinafter in this Resolutiori, -the subject Variance request is :referred to .as "the application', On March.' 14; 1490, the Piann Ig Cohnissiort of the. City­of Rancho. Cucamonga conducted, a' auTy noticed, public hero tiing on the : pplica.tion and concluded said: td, raring oh,that da :All lega['prerequisites prior to the adopi~fa� fin;this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it i '' hereby found, det�;mined: and resolved, by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho`Cucamonpa as follows: 1 This Comnisstzn °hereo,):specifically finds that,al;i -of the fac,s 'aet forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ;[re,_true and correct, 2 This Comm'sSiart hereby finds and`ce[rt'ifies that,the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmenta-1 Quality Act of 1970 and_fi`nds.the project,to be.Class 1'Categorically:Fxenpi, 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this ;Vm i.iiion during • the above-referenced ,public,hearing,,on March 14 1990,`including 'written and oral staff reports, togeth r 'With public testimony, ,,j:his Co t',ission hereby specifically finds as follows:. {a) ;The application applies to property located at �235; Jasper Street:with a street. frontage of 293.45 feet and lot depth ranging from 145 feet to .234.59 feet! and is ,presently improved .with one (1) single .famil!y, residence; and (b)- ';Ail adjacent parcels `have.`been .developed with singlet am l 'residences and are located w,i,thin the Very Low Residential District; 3 s� •` is. "',� tea., ,� •, PLANNaTNG I' So VA 9O-J9''�'RI'SAR,tQ'". Page,,, i � t S Based upcin the findings-a conclusions: set"farLh in_na+^anM,ng� 3, and 4 above, th4SaCOMMI ss�iont hereby dente5 the application,, t C; 6 The.:Secretary ta. :this i:omm,ssion shall certjfy to the"adoption bf this Resolution ; .� APPROVED`AND ADOPTED THIS I4T►fi"DAl' OF MA 1990, . PLANNIVG COMMISSION•pF Tk CITY,'OF',RANCHO:CUCAMQNGA 14 BY, Larry'T,. McNiel, �hairman ATTEST: }1 Brad Buller, Se.creta.ry � t r I. Brad Bd filer, sect `tart', of the; Planning `Commission :'of ilie'City, of Rancho Cucamonga; da° hereby 'certify that the foregoing Res8lution Was ,duly and regularly ,introducedy passed, and 'adopted by the Planniog ,Co mmisss'orr of,the City o;P Rancho Cucamonga; at a reg"a1ar`meeting of the- Piannin ;Cortmision held r: on the"14th day of March.; I?30, by,the following AYES: CQi+�'lsm,NERS5 NOES. t r "ABSENT': Cow °•A M1 h •� ,C a 1 y y 4T5 ks �✓Ff A .\ �F * � \ m CITY OF RAXCFpt:6 MtgtAgg1V#W_,-A . rtr w SJL�..;Bb�Y ibT:., ?• DATE: '.March 24, r9rlll k TO: Chairman and Members of the;PT3nning Coneni pion i It FROM: brad Bu-iler,. City Planner BY: Bruce BackinghaM. Planning•Terhnie-Ln ; SUBJECT: VARYANCE 90-161 - - VERA �- A raquest to .allow �,the construction of a house to encroach intp ,the required inte, o.ik side +3rd setback;by �, feet:'for'a s?ngle family residence located p,5 the Low'Resdential DistricK dwel]fnj'units per.acre)' at 98I7 *ernn:'P-u vard - APN 209-663-03.• C PROJECT AND SITE OESCRIPTIONr A. Actan Rnouested: Approval. of a` Variance to reduce' the interior side yard setback B. Surroundinn,Land Ugn•and Zonineae: North - `Existing Single Family'HoRes, Low Residential. District (2-4 dvaeliing;units per acre) South. 'Existing Single Family Hoires;;,Lpw.-Residential District (2-4-dwell ing;units' per.,acre) East - Existing Single. Family Humes;, Low Residential District (Z-4 dwelling?Units per aere). '_ t best - Existing Single Family;Romes,;��o� Residentia" District (244 dwelling;units per acre; C. General -Plan Des'ianations: Project Site'- Low Residential-District:(2-4 dwelling units per acre) North Low Residential-District South - L'ow R±si'denti.al District s East- - Low' RisidentialSDistrict k'est - Lave Residential District D. Site Characteristic`s,. ;The site is. ,�esanL:'and Vegetation consists of native weeds and`p]ants.. w_ y ' Y- •� t PLANNING,COMMISSION STAFF`"REPORT VARIANCE ,90-61 VERA March s14, 1990 Page.2' II, ANALYSIS - - A Ceneral: The applicant is requesting a V6rian C611to reduce the interior side yard. setback on the westerly 5' a ,o.f the l"ot from ten,(10) feet to :five (5) feet., in order to canstruc't"a 1,4a"0 square foot.-single family dwel.l,ing. The subject,ja is located east. of Archiba]d on the south sides of Feron Boulevard..;, The lot isl3 feet by 160• feet.(5;600 square feet) with street frontage on the north, and'�pu61 a laey` on the- 0 south. The .subj'edt lot. is, legalki on-can forming JW.terms: 'f " area and, width, wtalch is typical :'throughout -'the neighborhood. The -,Development Gode . 'al,]ows for - the ' constructs%an of a s7:�g►`e.family. home` onr:a :substandard` legal lot as 'long` as.it Orr ets all:•development standards: B. , Site Constra4 atn. In reviewing the Variance request, :staff examined t`e site Constraints of the lot. The subjert 10'L•is, " 35 fee* iaide'which is.subst6-itially less than �hp,requl red;`65 feet as per,the,current;standards"of the Development Cgoe for the Law Res!denti J "District. In addition,':,the' Tot size `is, 5,606 sg6are.feet'which is considerably less than-the minimum > of 7,200 square feet required under, the current standards "of the Development Cade for the Law Residential District C. CharacterzsSics of the Surround`n Neidhborhood• The'' surrounding neighborhood has'a wide variety ::and widths, however, "the vast ,majority':are also. legally 'n'on- conforminn id';ayea and width: ; .The single family homes `on.the r north side. a' Feron Bo levard possess the` typical" characteristics of a Low Residential bistrict'o' A field surjey, indicates hat They meet the intor•,ioe side yards se,t4itk. standards of ten JIO} feet and',five;(5) feet. As for"j�the houses on the south side of' Feron Boulevard;ithe field'sul•uey shows a' variation of standard and substandard lot ;sizes "and lot widths, However; ,the majority of the'lots?meet the interior s'Jde yard setbacks of'. ten (IO} feet and' f1ve.-(5) feet. The established character`on the' south;: ide of Fero:n is that of small, one-story -bungalows with detached garages tn, the rear. There are"severa;°lots wit635-f6ot �ridths and 1'60- foot lengths which typical.ly 'have detached garages on"the rear-11 portion of the lot. In conclusion, staff finds that the iit and shape oaf the subject; lot is substandard which could 'create a;. physilaT hardship for the applicant to build'a singta me There,There areL'several aimilar lots towards;-ahe •south sfde of FQron• Boulevard :that; have . nonconformind .interior' side s=tbacks s� LANNING,,COMMISSION, STiFF REPORT" �VARIANCE,90-01 'JERA. March 14,.17g9O Page'3 However, 'the proposed ';+structure is not consistent with character of thesurrounding 'neighbortioad: III. OPTIONS Staff believes that; there are alternative floor :plan arrangements -which could comply With the C.ty'ss'set,Acks, Oner; example from .Terra Vista is-,shown 'in Exhibit "E", A A 'zero lot line style footprint;' 20 feet wide; with a",side entry front door•,. w0, neet the repujred and. 19 fotlt side ' and setbacks (see Exhibit "F'1)„ The disadvantage of this ption' is that the' streetscape would, 6e;dominated by, the.`, garage door B. A variation of i`he zero Tot 1rne house wou.id be' to utia.ize.a . side entry garagi' f se6 xkibit "G"j'...=The.,disadvantage of:this option. is that �e ;narrow to, would~necessita'ze,deve-loping a' shared driveway through the property ao,tha 'east. C. A detached.garage in:the .rear.woul'd'•al1dw..the 1iui'ng areas of the house~to, face the street consistent with the neighborhood character' (see Exhibit"N"j, 'This option would s1 11,Y require , reaucing the,footprigt width ;to. 20 feet to;compl.y with'the'.5` and 10 foot side yard setbacks. If the Commission.� feels..that 5 ^root side yard setbacks'are ` justified, the Commission may want to 'still require a, detached garage;in the rear to mitigate the streetscape appearance 'of, the.,. ` structure, IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS,: LL In order to `approve the proposed Uar..iance, the Planning. Commis-sion must make all of the..fotlmi,6g findings. Any finding `in the negative .vaoulld.preclrsfJe ?approval of 'the variance request. f., A. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe specified regulation ,would .result in practical d.ifficul,ty or`, unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the;objectiYes of this Cooe: , B. . That there are exceptional or..eAraotd�nary circumstances or conditions applicable':to the., property involvedr..oi toR1 e intended use of the property -:that do not apply generally: #o other properties in, the;.same zone. C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of'the specified,�regulation would deprive the applicaert of;privilegesf � en3oyed by the owners of other properties an;.the'-sane zone'. �y k 444 L.a q � PLANNING COMMISSTOti`STAFF REPORT•' VARIANCE 90=01. =;VERA: j; ". March ICI:.1990 "age 4 0. That .the grahtrg of t{ie Variance ,will not constitute a grant ' of speciald•ivile , he limi-tation.s, on other properties clas,,�ffled ,in'-.the same..zane E That' the granting. of the Variance will noc be detrimental to che ;public health; safety, or welfare or, material injurious :Properties or.-tmprgvements :'in the vicinity V. RECOMFfENDA7IOM Staff recommends the ; the Plannirg Commission take une of the fol;]CWM4:actions:< 1) .Deny t ei nce, request and, direct staff to prepare. a Resolution wyth findings for.adrption:at your next`meetiag. 2) Continue the request"to allow the, applicant ta' d'evelop, a; floorplan. which:'meets all required setbacks, consistent with one of the options,descrtb4d ,above. Stat'T does not Support ,the granting of 'the variance, a's currently 'proposed. r Respectfully; submitted Brad`:Bul City;'Ptanner BBsBR j!, Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map. Exhibit,"5" d Topogra'pizy. ap showing .exis'ting structures F;hibitI "C" Site Plait and Floor Plan habit "D" _ Elevations Exhibit "E°' = Alternatiiye Floor plan'and Elevations Exhibit "F" - Option A 'I Exhibit 1%G"` " Option.B ti Exhibit "H" - Option. C41 i i i r t S. �Q�WLtffl fl i.l _-. «. ta,-s• im2• x.r re.u:in .Dx..:ro r. - A -. ,' - aftifSlD DM•.0 S09 DiK . �_ !t`alpl'. .i r. "7 x• � R .zl• y N f��°� 'r•Is tzs lb a39 b J T �^ z 20 !! $= C CYO$ >u '.9` :cet•,. � z,i '., �.>. ,Q..f 201� �.. a p ur•C� 'q,:_ < q�la a zl_-1 to �. urr ® � W3 $ wsr� GG 4 a y `)Iiy F• e � 4Y - n6! i•-•CIE < y<„ __ .rp 76L^ R � y =B9 4 RS'FV gO,uLEVdRD--i 9B• Lel L• K� r ey:. �. +. � Q 99n LD,•N• n116 117 LQ/•P- OI .43, 06; 17 S ` JB J9• S8$a=_ P,ra I su. 'jn a �: /�.. H�•L ,�7 a x.:G�c:. ? c?�u to .e•— FERGY _i — �.d�iyY� •. .� •6LY0. t, C O .: ^vc ,8.. y .. t4i9 88 8,It0It)J8 O?IB N IJ,,t a I/,/ 8 i / le'IJ 4 3:2 a E. .. :. r t9 t/8r tl18/37 J1 J23JJ4 18,.. 414t N1IT 940 2 S 6"}fYB�ti JD 971J27�J6 J8<04x�ltN K494847 a9aeJr:e..�- :F` / ALM •rfr ,r. taL-: STREET 17 • x 1 �. 1,l� 24YJ tt 21 20 18 18 1 f!��1i 14!/L.11.0"9 1 7;6 V 4 J i i 4 tB�BJ tt t0 I"t,T.t/'iD N 19 1811,i 1//.0 7' 9 4.S I t•I c.K i Q Wi IDf'N•l Mx m<' . . . pp 1 ray Dw•r<t Nx<0• O' — STREET Orn. _ 7--- 4 C ® I d $� LTI�ANfON Ae; . TTM— t/62 k-o I Fi NIlR£ C3'I MSI1�1 '�°[�'LE: LOc�?1on{ nt�t'" _ ' E;CI,tIEt'I: SOLE: JF:IRSEY—Big x s �^. c n_ 4 't f • t h � 11 1 x x A [ 1 x n 44 � [— x naffs 3 14 x [ [ Ix x 11 x tW.3 HERO ! ,.Sl. x m 1 e°o°i t ���---•� a i - A E pY 4 I l I MAN STREW'tmt X 4 tfw 9 r x 1106.4 w x / M � \/A 9U—� CITY ®F;I�1�3tJ +C�.CAIi�f®I�iGA Y'YEM: f. 'PLANMNG"'DP ISYON 'YTYI.E: ARP N." ;. EXYdYYiYT: " CALF—' � DU i d N N U 9° 137 p� J N � a � a=a W �� d ��_ Q' 7` vu•L t r i r r m room =ar 7 7s ,. — -� t f T C OF I iot L�C�iIYIONOA rrEly: tiR� �Or►��_ Y'LA NWO t IVISION TMM. EXHIBrt: G SCALD: tlitrtrtt'rlift : t�t,tllir,` ! .I t11''' K i t t tt l r MIM • a r � I 1 r i •f � f 1 1 i ' 1 j (�; 1-7 _ t r 1 CITYS1 I i� ® L3CAi t3NGA i'Fttli: VAS- s—o 4 PLANNING MON 'ffi�TLEe , F—1 r;V A�llord 5 HIBflT: SCM E: 10, 26'-0. t Mltl a m� - -I 10.12' 16'x 12' 1 ` 1 'r— -- - ------------- i 10'x12.54 1 '1 f •� tom. Iq i iLOCK �.JL �n� • 20'20' Ilur u1;�Qks'qll 1 I J.• � � � ��' ME, � d \ `tv t `fr`� bi tfg as v - ia, i+• _ t T • Zt. REAR ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION f.htr.,, t•.t. 2( a No RIGHT RIGHTi' SIDE ELEVATION . 9 ® � 13 —lo } R "s �CI'%Y cad`t AEI`' 'c6cwo GA PL�N P G'Dry r®x ; agrioof A f s F7 /�+�ry�. 'mac g✓ d/�7�T A.. �pg� -, i.l i,.;�op Ai i9'LV�..d3, 6.6i C AlYiON A r a r.IP- MIS sc�ie L. �l �R. 7v ----------------I 7L Y PLAI'+3Pusl�lG I9F`�IOIe1 7'ii It��I a 'SCALE:'( `t cITX OF RANG I�0 CIIC GA STAFF. REPORT r, DATE: March:l4, 1990 70: Chairman and,Members of the Planning Commission FROM- Brad fuller,<City Planner BY: NancyFong, SeniorFlanner'. SUBJECT: MODIF]:CATIOlt 70'CONDITIO.dAI USE PERMIT 87-26 - SANDERSON :,RAY'& PETRY'/ AS - he`request to rehabilitate site existing 10,ti,I,4 sgttare foot 'Ylinzryr Bu#lding,,and; 79$-square-root Still' Building fps: office, retail, a.d.restaurant uses within the.'.. Thomas, )Vinery Plaza, fir., the Specialty., Commercial District of 'thi i:oothill •.fl60u Vard Specific Phan,: ,located ` at .the northeast co'rne"r .of Foothill Boulevard and.Vineyard Avenue a .APti: '208-101-I'O and 11: I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the,praposea rehab:work for the Winery and Still Buildings B. Surrounding Land-Use and Zonin4 North -= Vacant, Single Fa"milt' H6mes; L'ow_Residental District„(2-4 dwelling utyits per acre} South - Vacant, Liquor Store; Community Cormnercial District East - Shopping Center; Community Comiercial District, West - Roller Rink, Restaurant Unoccupied Building;. Community Co�r�aercial_ District C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Specialty Commercial Barth - Loa Residential South - Community Commercial East Community Commercial` West Commmunty Commercial ; D. Site Charectcristics: Phase I of the Shop ping ..Center is completed while Phase Ito o, s. sting of Buildings G 'Hi and I, it under construction: The area`. slated, for"Phase .III, consisting of Sui]dir `"U, is ro"ugh-gradeds The: iinmedriate Impt,ovemants around the Still and Winery buildings have been cc, ,Meted . LTE�f G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFr REPORT CUP 87-26 MOD;IFICATION.NrX; 1 - SANDERSON, ,RAY,'PETRY/OAS March .4, 1990 Page 2 �. Parking Calculations_ Number of Number of Type Square `Parking -$paces Spacesx of Use Footaoe Ratio Required Provided 'u Restaurant• 7,629 1/100 90- 90• Retail I3,874 i/250, 55 56 Retail "975 1/250 16 Retai1 28,166` 1/250 113 113 • - Re;tail: : ;. 7.,972` . , 1/250. 32 ";. '' 32.= If Fide 6,06L'� 1/250 24, �: 25 Retail 8-110 11250 35 35 Retail _ 2,902 1/250 12 12 14 Retail 9,909 1%250 40. 40 Restaurant* 8,500 1/100` 85, 97 Retail 1,500' I/250 6 . 6 (Wi.'nery Bldg.) Retail 729 I/259 3 3 {Sti11.B1dg.) 512 - 525 *urler 6,000 sq. ,f for each restaurant F. Aoplicable Redulations - The proposal to rehabilitate the Winery and Still ;Build.ings would require the processing of ah6 fol lowing,apNlication:, 1. ': Modification: to the Conditional, Use Pi`rmit subject: to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. ` Landmark Alteration PerE t to be-,reviewed and al+,�roved by , the Historic Preservatio"w"Comm ission. II. ANALYSIS: j �i A. Backoround: In 1987, both the Historical , Preservation' . Commission and, the Planning Commission co'nductea.'a ;Joint workshop to review the;Thomas Winery Piaaa .a new specialty' retail center that :was designed around 'the two' historic.. buildings. Subsequently,; thee' Planning Commission conditionally approved the Conditional ' Use .Permit for ",the. center and the Histowle Preservation Commission leer®ved.'the Landmark Alteration Permit. F:. The developers 0AS', with a new partner, Sanderson, Ray and r' Fetry, _are proposing._to rehab the win ary and.-Still; buildings 1 for the• mixed. ,use, of,:office, -retail -and restaurants ,•" On January 4;, 1990.,, the :Planniilg.v:Coran ssion :and .tfie Hi-boric ` PCANNINB 'COMMISSION,WAFF aEPORI tin CUP 87.-25 MODIFICATION N(�_'1 SMO6.SON,�-.RAY, PE(RYJOAS j . March 14, I99D �,. Page 3. I Preservation Commisslm conducted a`Joint worksho.'p to review Y F the proposal ;Attached for ;your reference ara he minutes from tk}e.:3oint meeting„ Rased on the direction .#rorr the:two illf Commissions, the"'Sppiicant revised ,the development plan3_for, the proposed rehabilitation for the Vinery and S.til1 buildkings , ax resubmitted for ,Design, Review Committee ono Hist<�ric , Pieserva'tion 'Commission''review B . Design Review Committee -The Cottee.,(Chttiea, Weinberger and Kroutsl reyiewed the revisEd:paans .on Februark 3 and recommended approval reith thg following conditionsj' �,.• 7.; Any ground�_mqunted equipment,' such a`s a/c ,units'; should . • , be sc kned_•with a :combi'natinn Hof d ' o•rative wails and landscaping:, 2. Certain -kitchen 'equipment', Such as a grease tieod, may U. 41loiwed to extend ;above the roof However, :ia shal;l: be Pie-pi -to',a 'mini*m;--subject to `Design" Review Committee,ti. review and approvai Inaddition, the'developer shou`1d ' submit tro'aiternative scrten'ing mcethpds, using a do.rmQr desgn oar otter_ agricultural; design el.emet, "--De sign,`. Review,.CoMmittee,�review°.and"approvalGity'��ariner,. � upon a site.i.nspect'ian, may :requirz e. developer;ia use, f one'of the ;approved screer��ng raethads ` or`s�'reeniirg:the K roof; egoil+Aent/prgJectian, .prior to., the release of,, occ�rpancy. „. .I 3. 1he proposed d ought tolerant plant palette •in front: of the :original Winery Building :: the 'Adobe pur¢ion} is acceptable; ; If these plant materials ;are to:.be extended_ around-- the �enti.re` "rlineryv.Buil iii49y'?then� it` sha11; be, brought back' to .;he,,,Desigh,,:Review,Gor�Bnittee:,,for�.review ` ' an¢ approval'.prior to. issuance of any buiidir.4, permits. C Heavy+ redwood outdoor-,furnishings are acceptabl,e .zas a concept.. Detailed design of ;all hardscape: shall' be submitted .to Design Review Committee: for- review _and. approval. 5. Signs a. R.lor profile ,frees'tanding manument s7gn ,identifying � the 'alimry as the oldest"Winery in Galfornia is acceptable ":Thei+inal. design snail be :sub3ecL; to ."Design .P-eview`Corr6fhee review and_approval prior to issuance of any sign';;perraits. . 1' a t1 r PLANNING, Comki§SIOW STAFF.REPORT CUP 8 -26'MQDIFICATION NO°.'1 SAHDERSON RAY,.PEy, ? ``S March:14, 1990 " Page 4 3° b The: size." of the wal"1 ,sign on the. west elevation; =r shouid be reduced. c. The south and north',eleVati`ons "of'ttie Stull 8ui1'ding _ sh I maintain the °Winery,logo ;sign as'."<origi;nal"ly approved. Th,e lineal signs:on, ha",east ,and ;west elevatio"41•s are acceptable..;. 6'. , The'wall mounted equioment, 'such_ ds ga's mete"rs, should be relocated",to the north side "and be screened. 7. The light fixture: underneath the roof eaves on the vest" elevation should.:6e"elimi,nated..•: C Historic', Preservation Commissions 4. On March 1 1:9901,` the, glatoric .Preservation Commission condUcte a Public'Heari'ng to review".the Landmark. ,A`iteri" on`, Permit No. 90'03; for;,.the proposed rehabiTr�ationof the Wineryand� Still buildings.;. In" i} reviewing_ the .,permit' request, the. '.Historic Preservation Commission raised several concerns arid'"'they are. sum-�arized as }. follows= a The, speculative" uses for 'the two buildings could have an adverse impact`io th,e rehabiTitatio "work. " n o The "leveling, of'. the' "exlsting„ stepped finished floor inside'-"the winery floor could ,have'an adverse'impact to the historic integhity.of tha building.. o Th2 inadequacy of :the:artifacts plan o The existing "".freestanding and future. wall mounted goosehead design`ii,ght fixture is"inappropriate. o The potential "roof.�equipment projecting out from the roof of the Winery"Building. o The. potential office use on. the "second,,'floor'. the Winery Building. The Historic Preser;vptionl. Commission, after lengthy discussions cancern.inghe.safe ty and structural 'integrity of the two buildings in"fight of the recent"ear.thquakes, ,dec dedLL to"conceptually approve the Landmark_'Alterati.on. Permit.- "This conceptual approval `is "for.,; the shell alteration a^ restoration only and ?subject to-,specific conditions ::hat address those"concerns• raised. in the discussion- The Htstorie" Preservation " Commission them directed staff to.";prepare a F i I y E it t to �; PLANNING COMMISSXON'STAFF""REP 't7 r , CUP 8746 MODIFICATION NU.:,] ANQERSON,;;RAI(, PETRX/OA5 ,I k March I4,. 1990 Page 5 Resolution ai " Approval with " Conditions formalizing ' the �} approval 'of the Landmark Alteration Permit, for their ,review ,F and approval at. the April T-+ 199t. regular 'meet;"�g. The f Conditions of Approval are summarized as'.followsj 1, Submit a, ed artifacts pIdn`; /F 2, The,"screeni'ng `method,should be`;a dormer design.'Tor the kitchen roof equipment: ` 3.` Eliminate, the �a11 "mounted"goosehead" design light fixtures..„ 4., Ground co4er and'shrubs around the building' mu4t reflect the:winer,� 'heritage. ' 5., The"adds.ional monument:sijn to ident,i Hy "the"�rfinery as the.;alde`st one .in Cali:farnia " must 'be..-su6ritted' for Oistorio�Pr,eservat oft Commission-review,and,xapprovaI 6.„ The, tin. material. for j'W 'Still building shall be _aged' thNough".aci¢ bath: 7.' The street .furniture and All other, hardscaaes 'should " reflect the Early CalifornQa Mission Style and should tie;. of heavy duty<.wood. rr Restore and install a directional`.sgn for the Rains House. 9.' Restore and Anstal! the 6 'Camind Real Bell 10. The freestaadin0 iig.tt fixtures in the 'parking:lot should be repaint2d black"'in col,ore i�. 11 Submit'.documentation indicating!"that the: Department; of ,,7 `. Interior•rejected, tft registration of the Ijinery.6uild1.ing- as�a` National 3iistorlcai ia-ndmark. Staff Comment: In fiscussiMng the concerns with; thn Tight fixtures, the Histor Cc Prese�iv�tion" Commission, indicated that the "teal" color, made :the fixtures .stand out too'much: ` By repainting them: black, the fi"xtures would fade;: in to,,°the :" background making .the.,Winjery building stand out more,` There are 'a total of 10 freestanding light fixtu?;es .ivithin'k,=the parking lot of`�th4 Winery building. $toff has yisitetithe site numerous times at h.ight.and nagced that the_parking lot fo.r the center° is,bright#y_Iit:, Since ,the deve loper_,'"has rt ;i PLANO G COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87-26 MODI�FIC,TIOh•N(r - SANDERSON , RAY,- PETRY/OAS March: lh, 1990 Page 6 Agree d to. use 'downiighting and �'uplighting to lite up- the ;. Winery and Still buildicngs, perhaps an alternative solution to repainting the eIicjht fixtures black' is to remove these 10 light', fixtures and[ replace them with.ground .mopInted ones for uplighting. The)evetuper could prepare a' det,xil;ed lighting plan to show h06 the Winery and `Still buil4ings_ ,and� the parking. of are `adequat*ely-lit up,= subject to City {Planner . _ review. and -approval; Since ahe Historic Preservation'; �s Commission will .be reviewing `the.Resolution of.Approval, with ` Conditions_ for' the conceptual approval ,;of.;'"the Landmark , Alteration Peimi on�,April t,; 1990;, staff'lvouid .be informing u the Commission`of this 'alternat•ive solution. I11. _ FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project sl�consis ' with .the General Plan and the Foothill .Boul:evard Specific -Plan: : In addition: the proposed use, ,building design,,•and site plan,,to'ether Withthe , recommended conditions of approval, are, in compliance with the. Foothill Boulevard Specific. Plan and all. other '; applicab�e provisions of the City's. standard's .' The project will 'not cause, any adverse environmental impacts;` IV. CORRESPONDENCE: ' This item has been. dyzrti,sed'as a pub At , in The Daily Report='newspaper. Public heari,ng;>not1ces,were,,sent to .all; properties w thin-300' feet of rthe project iltd and within the entire�Subarea 2:.af"the Foothill_Boulevard ;$peci,fic Plan. In `addition, the site has been;posted for public hearing. V. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommehds that the Planning Commission approve the modification to Condaional Use .P..ermit 87-26 tfirough the adoption of the;attached Reso.Tution. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bul er , City Planner BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Jarivary 2, 1990 Joint Historic Preservation and Planning Commissions Mlnutes Exhibit "A"'- Deta'iled Site Plan` Exhibit "B"r- Landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "'yD." - Conceptud,1Exteribr, Artifacts-Plan Exhibit.'IV Elevations :for Winery Building 1khibit,"F" Elevations for.Stil•1 Building - Exhibit V1, - Existing. Interior Conditions Exhibit "H" - Floor Plans : Resolution of Appreival with Conditions ,CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5 JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC'PRESERYATION COtAf+ISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting January 4;:1990 i Chairman 'McNi6l and Chairman, Schmidt called the joint .meetirg,yof.,the City of Rancho Cucamonga Piaraning.Comrnissiton and <Historic Pr>etervatioi; CbRmis'sion to" order at 9:15 P.M, The meetng'was. held at Cu the"Rancho. camonga .Neignborhood Center, ',9791'Aerow Highway, ;Rancho Cucamonga,­Californi.a. The,puepose',of the workshop Was tM1 F_t;iitate_'review :and.I I,discussion ,between the,.two�Commissinns over the .proposed -rehabilitation".work for the'Winery.and Still' ,buiTdings at Thomas Winery Plaza and to•provide di.,rection to the developers: ROLL CALL. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ; PRESENT:, David. Blakesley, Suzanne Cmtiea, Larry'1c�`#el,.;� etsy Weinberger ABSENT: Peter,Talstoy 4. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT:, Nielicent Arnert.. Marsha= Banks, GeO Billings; Steve,Preston, Bob Schmidt - ABSENT,. ., Adai:ooper, A]an Haskvitz STAFF PRESENT:' Brad BUlier, City.. Planner, Dan. Coleman, Frincipal� Planner;• NancyFong, Senior Piannen Jeff'Gravel; :�sslstont"Planner.;<Larry ,,Henderson' Principal Planner; Dtto'KroutiTj Deputy.City;Pianner Brad Buller, :City Planner, intr4oduced the Commissions and,;' f to 'the . developers and their•professional, teams. ' John Loomis, 30th Street Architects,, Inc. presented.the proposal to the two Commissions. He gave a definition of what rehabilitation •is. Eie',further explained the unsuccessful attempt to nationally :register the winery building as a National Historic Landmark. }he prdRosed rehabilitation is to focus :on , the period of significance between 1920's to 1930,"s; The, rehabilitation work will distinguish the,new.work from:the old, in a subtle way. ,The purpose is to identify the old and the new with,a=ntemporary'interpretation of, th 01d. .John Petry, Sanderson, Ray,.and Petry, explained ,the needs of future tenants.; - y Planning and 'Hi PC�M nutes - - 1 - ��.. January. :, .4 1990 . Chairman NcNiel d%sagreed with tie architect in that there should be -a• fr distinction between the original adobe wall and the 1959. portion. He felt the wall materials-and color between the old and new should not be highlighted at all. Commissioner :Banks stated that the landmark, overall, is being detrimentally affected by a ,cluttered look. She thought the.parking lot lights, interior illuminated signs, added windows, skylights, and roof sign contribute to ache cluttering up of a simple architectural 'structure. She felt if a,his.toric period is selected, it should be 1$391 since the significant historical aspect is the;claim that this is the oldest winery-in the state,and,the second oldest in the nation. She agreed with Chairman McPiiel that there does not..need, to be a subtle difference in stucco colors between the'old and the new portions of the building. She felt the architecture. 'oi` the new,tenter buildings. detract from the simplicity of =the -winery, rchitecture. She stated. La. • prefe7ence for wood shingles or shake and that,.:`here `shou�Vd not 'be'any roof mounted equipment, particularly on the northern exposure-';because of the proximity to Vineyard Avenue. She liked the 'idea of dormers, but not the skylights. Commissioner 'Preston`stated that he felt the period of historical significance " should also be 1839. He felt the landscaping was historically respectful ' _except for the selection of some of the ornamentals that proposed which look out of place. He requested details_, n the public outdoor fu"rn ture.. He recommended the use of wood as the primary material for any,.Outdoor, furniture and that its design be appropriate for the historical period of the building, Re was.also• concerned,with the types of decorative pavement that would be used around the building- He had a problem raith the roof and Aft interior illuminated 3igns `as proposed since i , would give it a cluttered look. He felt an artifacts; plan/list- is needed;with sufficient details. He stated he would like to see,'any new windows recessed as much as possible,,. N requested that the architect submit the National Nomination papers an, correspondence records to the Historic preservation Commission for verification of ineligibility, He too had a problem with the`roof,equipment , particularly on the north side of the building." He was also concerned with the ioss in the different floor elevations" and its. effect on the; spacial character of the interior. Commissioner Chitiea requested that additional details concerning the doors and window frames be brought back for review and consideration and designed to be consistent with the existing doors and ;windows. 'The landscaping around the d building should reflect the image of a winery and not a desert. She agreed the street furniture should be simple, but of'wood and metal materials with details to be brought back for review. Commissioner Weinberger stated that she was concerned about the speculative nature of the occupants of--the building causing many changes which may not'be. desirable or necessary. Commissioner Blakesiey questioned the decision as to whether the upper floor needed to be used for offices and that perhaps it should remain a­storu�G area or an artifact display area since the change in use was ,.going ;-f,I "cause additional openings (skylights, windows, and doors) in the structure:'" Planning and HPC Minutes - 2 - January 4, 1'990 Commissioner Prestom,cohcuPred with this 'perception. The consensus of yhe Historic `Preservation- Commission and the planning Commission- based on^revier�ing the proposal., was as fallaws: 1.% The old and new improvements to the original' winery, sho,67C not Oted " �9 ., ,•- . h- hti �- Z: The periodJof significance for rehabilitation should be the yean,,1839, 3. ;The changes to the buildings, tF�._dditio6s of skylights, new entries, signs, and etc i ma6 the winery building look .too cluttered. : G. 'The, use of wood shake for the roof`;matkrial 'is preferred. 5. Concern wa' raised with roof mounted equipmentJproaections. Exhaust pipes and fans should not be exposed The Commissioners...undeestcnd that some of 'the kitchen. equipment ,mi,66t .have' to .be exposed. The concern' is then how ta' minimize the visual 1mpact of the new vents and . how to architecturally treat them. 6. -The choice of plant pal ette.immediately adjacent to.the-::winery building should{reflect: the winery heritage: 7., Minimal street furniture should be used near ;and around the winery building. The design of the street .furniitre,:an&_h. icape must be' submitted for Historic preservation Commission and Planning 'Comm 1�on review and approval, ' 8. Minimal 'signs should 'be placed on the buildings. Painted'sgnsYare preferable. Identifying the winery, building as the oldest winery is acceptable; but nod ;through a painted roof -sign. Make use of "the • existing monument sip to identify businesses. g. 'Submit ,an inventory- cif artifacts and a plan to displ e ay them for. 'Historic Preservation Commission'and Planning Commission review, This should be dene prior to scheduling the project for. public hOorin r ...� 9 IQ. The addition of skylights is unacceptable. YI. A11 ground and will mounted egC401ent, such :as 1riters and ~Conduits, must be screened. 12. The types of doors, windows, stairwayls, railings,; and number.vf entries must be sensitive to and 'incorporate historic' -atterns. .materialsi colors, Ind styles, "- 13. Concernsiere- raised with the speculative users for thebuiidigg, which caused the numerous changes., 14. Night h ghlightingtjs' encouraged. Planning an HPC Minutes. - 3, - - January 4, '0 a AbJOURNMENT The joint ' Planning. Commis&ion and Historic, Preservatiah Commissicm meetingfworkshap adjourned at 11:50''PM. � Respectful i'y, .sybmitt6d,`' Brad Buller Secretary, J;t I r1�5 \4 ti. P'[anni!+g and HPC Minutes _ �� 4_ Jar�:ary 4, '199Q #' 40, a �i r .n.oc�awsa 1.r.�.srw � 1�1 L! d yl�tltr►/tin :.: • it a 0 QHAa 0 ...�, ..� t9 W All L,4 - - • 1 i ti� O i ter__ �� •� } �i i r �- .� � ` .�9. a�+ aft! ' ;.�� •:'`�` ! �: �' ® ��\� � ,. i1 C'$ Y4 it � �•O' • MAN o, cIms will at onq O j tt d � c Y a ! y c A • Vi xYt v�[Y 11 0 �j 1 x !3 i .0 , �J 6 OWA3YW�0l9AIMPAf#�ffVC s� ��, L I a� k O 13 y � 2 dlVAa"YfO�7941Q�J .. H I:, ff tt 1 4 a a �i; a t ialj f + m u rlr_ � _` t i �� ,•" � �. ,i I}}�! III. a ��-� � t .€�tN—•- �,u• ��s{it!c �S�' � �c� ncr pia.. VF�',: ` "7 :a F h i iM � S� � � t y °ram��'•�?�'��s JR s. 0 91 SN�'�11tlN0�JNILSIX3 ' all, s hT 1.7 . : R ,Y ;. _ r 5 S � j� � w .12813rr �IR52�4�5 a� ' 46. ZEN go Ell Ir ko 3 s. Y g r 13 r 4 Z ` � r RESOLUTION NO. 88-17C A ,RESOLUTION OF THE .PLANNING COPLIISSION OF',jHE'CITY' OF RANCHO, CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA• APPROVING .MODIFICATION ONDITIONAL USE;"PERMIT N0, '87-26.•FO.R THE. REHABILITATION . F OF-JHE`lEXISTING WINERY AND ,STI.LL BUILDING FOR.OFFICE, RETRY! Ai:^ °CSTAURANT USES WITHIN THE TKOMAS VINERY PLAZA- LOCATEO`9Tm7HE,NORTHEAST CORNER'OF=FOOTHILL;BpUlEV,ARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE-IN THE�SPECIAlTY COMMERCIAL :cis Ic AND MAKING FINDINGS'I_R SUPPORT.THEREOF - pPN.: 208-l0�-t0 AND' 1 11 '. r, A. Recitals. (i); Sanderson, Ray & Petry/OAS' has filed an'appiacat' ori for. a modification to Conditional .Use Permit No. 87-26 as described; in th`e,,title of this ltesolut. an. Herel;tafter;in..this Reso;ution,,,ttie subject Conditional Use Permit request is re.,erree'to as, application'% (,if) On'-the`'14th` of ,March, fi990,' the Planning ,Commission sof..the tz , City Rancho Cucam Riga;' conductEd a "duty." noticed `puW c hearing�.,on the application and'coneTuded.said hearing, on Chair date. , (iii) All legal` prerequisites prior to 'the 'adoption ' of ,.this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, .THEREFORE, it,is hereby found, determined and 'resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho' Cucamdnga as.,;fo11, „ . 1. This Commiss=ion hereby.specifkally finds that a11.of the facts . set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of'this Resolution are true and correct,. 2. , Based upon substantial evidence presented to 'this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, an March, 14,. '990, including written and oral staff 'reports,. together :with public testimony, ",'this Commiission hereby specifically "finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property'' located at the } northeast corner, of Foothill Boulevard and vineyard: Avenue: with-:,a .street frontage of 1,845 feet and lot depth of 7-3 feet and' is_,presently improved with retail buildings; and, : f b) The property to the north of the, su�'ject site is single family home s,Ethe'property to ,the. south is partly 'vacant .and 'partly deVel,oped wish a liquors store, the property"to,the'.east" an ex sting shopping tenter,) and the property to.'the.west i� an existing roller rink with restaurant k YJ.. _..�i A\. ALANN'ING-`COMMISSION'°RESOLUTION'NO. 88-47C CUP 87-215 MODIFICATION NG. <1 - SANDERSON `RAY, PETRY/OAS ` March 14, 1996 1 Page 2 ; (c) -The proposed rehabi1•'itation. of 'the Winery ;and Stull buildings would further imp lement the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plana sue. 3. Sa.ed upon the substantial ;evidence presented,:to this Corm;iss"ion during the above ,`Meferenced "public hearing and 'upon the specific findings;of facts at forth in,paragraphs- i 'and 2 above, this Coomission'hereby'finds-'and concludes as follow, (a) . 'T1,at the"proposed use is in accord,_with the General Plan, and the Foothill Boul�&ard Specific Man; the. abjeciives of the ,Development Code, and�t' :e qurposes if the' district i`#*i'which 'the site i"s located; it (b) That the proposer!, use, together with 'jthe conditions applicable thereto,`<,will ,not be :detririientai to 'the public health, safety, or welfare; or materially .in�uriPUS. .to .properties or improvements` in the, vicini y. (c) that'tho.prpposed use'compiies with each.of the,'applicable provisions of the bevelopment Code.and-.the F.00thil.Bpu.levard Spsci,fc Plan. � 4. 'This Commission'hereby finds anc d rtifies that the project has been reviewed, and..considered in ,compliance with' the California Environmental . Quality Act of 1970- and;", fuether, this Codinission has .issued a Negati+re Dec laration,.on'danua y 27,'1988. S. Based upon tlae<.findngs and conclusions, set, forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and<4,a6ove, .tbis Commission hereby approves he'applicat.ion subject to.each and every ,condition set forth below and ihco,�ora,el herein; by this' reference. l � Plannina­Division 1.• H71 pertinent conditions at-contp.4ned "in ,Resolution Nos, •s - 88-17, 88.17A,-and"88;178sha1 apply, 2. The roof• material shall be wood shake. A 'full sample of the wood shake .shad be submitted for Design Review. Committee review and appoval prior to, issuance of. building ¢ermi't_& fore redab•wori� 3. Any 'ground mounted equipment Such as, but not limitedtito, a/c uni;ts,, sha11 be screened., with .a ,combination of, decorative walls add landscaping. 4 G,irtain kitchen equipment, "Much �5 I-,`grease hood; may'6 a''1 owed ;to extend from the `rao = ;However, i t;shah tie k0,, to a minimum sub3eCt to'+-Design Review.Committee re1Jew and approval; Tn �apdition tie° developer sha?3 ssdrai,.t,two alternative ,screening me g dormet� design ors• other:•ageicul'tural -style l:etnent 1 �y. A� � ' 0 ;. PLANNING COPHISSI6 RESOLUTION NO 8a LZC CUP 87-26 MODIFICATION NO ,1` �OERSON, RAY; PETRY/OAS March 14, 1990 Page 3 y % I Design Review 'Committee review and approval prior:to issuance of any permits: The Csty" Planner, on a site inspect9orl,• may ,require the deve]ope.r to use one' the - approved screening'' methods .for : 'screening he roof , equip dent/projection prior= to the release-of accupancy,jor the W nsry and/or. Stfill, BgildingN " proposed drought tolerant plant palette in`. front of a the original Winery- Building (the Adobe. portion) 'fis acceptable :;If thsse plant materials are, -to. be extended ^� _ around; the u Enre=;Winery"< B uilding, then it';shall -be brought back`: to .Design Review Committee: for.' review;and approval prjor'to issuance of:buil.ding permits. r 6. The heavy redwood outdoor. furnishings are acceptaL,t aS a'•. ' concept. 'Detailed design Hof C=11 hardscape sha1.T ;be submitted to 'the cDesign Review Committee for review and approval'.prior to issuance of.build, ng prrRits f1( 7, Signs.` a, A low profile freestanding monument s.agn identifying the winery as the olddst .winery'in California :is acceptable The final' 'design shall be subject to. Design Review Co anittee review,and approval; p 4ior a� . ` issuance of any sign permits. b. The: size;of the wall, §igrfr on the West elevation'sh-Rl1 be reduced subject to :Design -Review;.Lommittee review and approval :prior to-issuaace-of,any sign permits. c. The south and north elevations of'the Still`B 'lding sha11.' 'matntain the Winery Togo -sign -as- originally approved._ The lineal signs:'on the east and west. .,. elevations Are acceptable. Finai' design and Sign area Shall be.subject to Design Review Comisttee review and' approval prior;1to`issuance of any sign-permits; }.e 8. The wall mounted equipment,'such d5, gas_meters,`,sha71 6e ,. relocated to the n screened orth side' and seened subject to,City '. °tanner-•review and approval, prior 'to issuance of building, permits. 9. The light fixtures,-underneath the roof eaves,on the west, elevation shall be,el;iminated. ; 10. Al] existing . ande new. doo 'rs', windows, -,:etc , . must be sensitive to,, and incorporate, the historic. patternsE materials, color, and` style. Detailed plans o.f.thc doors '` and. ;the :windows^�+c.,;shall •be submitted for Design Review. Cgmmit+<i review and.'approval prior to:issuance, of any peml is PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION'N0. .88-17C CUP 87-26 MODIFICATION .N1l.'1 - SANDERSON RAY, FETRY/OAS March 14, 1990 , ' Page 4 i I 11.1 A detailed exterior lighting plan for the Winery;_apd Stili , buildings and .the parking l.ot in front of;the Wi_riery: hall be submitted ,for City Planner review and;approvai prior.to issuance of building permits: The derailed lighting plan shall'address:.`the• adequacy`of lighting up the4-.Winery and, Still. ' buildings and the parking tot using special :techniques of uplighting., :and downlighting and iritbout using freestanding light fixtures.'. 12. Approyal shall ,,expire unless extended ;by the< Planning Commission,`if building permits are not„issue&,; r approved use has not ;commenced within 24 montks from the date `of approval. Engineering bivision 1. The gas meter's 'and sprinkler valve ion' the west side of the, building shall not be locat�il within 'the`pubi'ic right-of- way or_ sidewalk easement. �Zelocation of the 'gas meters shall' :be. approved 'my the` 1:tty Planner and the, City Engineer. 2. 1 he doors on� the west side, of the bui�lding �shall not h extend,into the public'right-of=way or ,sidewalk easement :when opened. Also, ;the proposed eating area. will not'be ' allowed within the public right-of-way or sidewalk area.. 3. An encroachment permit for the arbor that'extends into the public right !On'Vineyard .Avenue shall be recorded , prior to issuance of a building permit: 4. All outstanding .Cbnditipns' of- ApproVO for CUP 89-26 {Planning` Commission Resolution ;No. 88-17) for :Public, improvements shall be completed and accepted by,the City prior to issuance of;,building 'permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission :shall. certifyto the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS i4TH DAY OF MARCH, I990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. Mcidiel� .Chairman . ATTEST ra e - er ecre ary. PLA WO COW! SION,RESOLUTI6' NO. 88-17C CUP'07 26 , 'IfICAT10 NO �RAYpETRY/OAS March`=I4, 2 0 Page 5: I, d Buller, Secretary of the Ptan v niny Coamisston of the City _P Rancha Cucamonga. d0 he�eby certify that the fo`reyotmg Resolution was.'duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted. by the Planning,Commission of'the City of RanclO Cucamonga; at a regulari meeting of,they-Manning Co*issiOn held oil the 14th day of.t arch...1990, by'the following vote-tb iwlt; AYES: COMMISSIOfVERS: NOES: COMMISSIQNERS' k' ARSENT;. C0MMISSIONEP<s•� y T 4'AT tl J. If` I' L `k r. .tit Q a t 2` �,: ` �a ""�` r r' :y, �� .�.� - ��' +� 7 11� �k �/ i. r \�'� �� ,1J, , ., ��.r_ �� i ='�-�_,, � -k ,. A\ � it .} .� � . ,.' - ,, . �., :. „. ,, r; ���„�, � � �} ✓y �it �_ 1 �. �:, � .. C .. l ��' .�, .. _ ,� - -- � -. rr � ' .. . i{. 1 } {-.� � �� �� t����.�� �� 1 � � `�� J� � n � z �L j° ��� ` a SS � � r� � u (mil CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiyIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 14, 1990 i� TO: ayor and,Members of the Ciiy Council' FROM: Brad'Buller, City Planner c�}l BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner . SUBJECT: PHASING PLAN FOR CONDITIONS-'USE PERMIT 8E 12 —.WESTERN PROPERTJES A request to modify, the; phasingpan for Terra Vista;Towne Center. ,located at tide,-northeast corner of Haven Avenue and,Foothill Boulevard APN: -.077-421-05, 06, and;1R. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant "s re uijsti a t' p q g•_�� proval to the.,proposed modification of the.Phasing; Plan.;` ANALYSIS:II. ail t � A. Background: On 'November 30,; 1988,, the Planning'Commission approved the Phasing Plan as i.shown Exhibit "A." Subsequently, the Phasing Plan was: amended on December 14, 1988. A copy of the amended;,-Resolution No. 88-236A has been included ini th is report for-" your reference. B. Surrma",,..bf Changes. 'Staff has pr�60ared Exhibit "C:," a table 1 comparing the approved. Phasing Plan with the proposed modification and indfcating, the status, of each p! t9d development. I 1) Phase I. Pad 1 (Chilvs) isJadded .to th-;s phase. { hill's is currently in Plan Check. 2) Phase II: Buildings G, J, and Q have moved,tito Phase II while Buildings S and P and Pads 2 and 3 h&e moved out to Phase III: 'Final building design for buil'aings - ;• E; G,-T,�3 R, and Q have been revi-jwed by' the Plannino ; i Commissor at a Design Review WorkshnP} of December-19, 1999. The CommissionIhas approved the . final building` design, =Aith conditions that.'cer.tt arch ftural eleme,ts.are subjected to further Desto, Revfev ' mmittee Review 'and approval, ,.Bui7ding,�; ass,-;; ',•' �t Stort M's currently_,Jn Plan Check. To D , t t, tj ;.PLANNING-COMM ISSION'STAPF"ERORT' PHASING PLAN FbFkUP 88�*1 - WESTERN March.14, 1990' ' Page-'2 c L? I r l�. �A Condition.•of Approval for this Phase II required xthaI Buil.di�9s S and P and Pads,1'. 2, and 3 must 'tie 'in ° substantial construction prior to,, the `,release of occupancy for Major-2 (Mervyn's). With the proposed ,changes to, the Phasing of- the building construction; staff r._ecommends that this Condition of 'Approval `be' modified as. follows: ter' "Pad 1, Buii'dings E. 'G, J, ,.R, and, Q .shall be undXr substantial construction prior, to occupancy 'of Major-2." 3) Phase., III. Since Pads 2 and! 3, Bu. ldings ,S & P 'have moved to Phase 1II; staff recommends' that Condition of Approval be added'as follows: Buildings S''�'Ind P and Pads .2 and"3 shal�i be`and/ <� substantial coEgiruction prior to occuFancy;,af Major�,3 and/or =4, Which occurs first." M. CORRESPONDENCE: Staff recommends: that thei Planning Commission review the changes of the phasing plan,, If the 'Comnission concurs wit' `staff ' recommendation ' then approval of the Resolution No:z11. `^66 would-be in order. ,1 Respectfully'submitted, a Brad;Buller City Planner BB:NF js r.rt , Attachments Exhibit "A" -Approved,tPhasiag Plan Pf.November 30, 1988 Exhibit IT" -Resoiution'•No. 88436A Exhibit "C" -Compariso?ti-of Approved and .Revised Pha'sTn ''fan, Exhibit "A" =Rsys.ed Phasing Plan Resolutioh of Approval. { G1 , .®� a < z UUO�±�tt, l C W C iLLI t c u Ht Z hi} OQlDl.i 111@ ! all Ut Z a co r ❑ R [5-j G C7— ;lio 5 @Qita@@JCQ? / ° � �, ' be aEi! a / ! Ck ¢ m io o _f�__� �`•� /L i i 1— O �.N 14 - III I-A VT .� D-3 RESOLUTION 'NO. 88-236A A RESOLUT ION;UF SHE kAHCHO CUCAFAONGA PUNNING COMKIISSION " APPROVINC THE PHASING PLAN. FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. , 8g-12 FQ� TERR�,.`VISTA TOWN CENTER, AN INTEGRATED ` COMMUNIFY;SHOppING`CENTER ON-71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NWHEAST , CV1ftR OF HAVEN AVENUE AND F4OTHIL.L BOULEVARD AhD.AAKWG FINDINGS Ili SUPPORT 11sVIZ-OF APN: 1077-421-051 OS'';AND 13. A. Recitals. On April 27, 1988, this Cewission adopted its aesoluti -on i.A:., 8 8-7 thereby approving, ` subject .tq rrecified corditions, k community shopping center on 71 acres of 'land in the Comm. pity Commercial GistriC of the Terra '33ta Community Plan., A true and: coil.. ete,'copy of said Resolution is attached hereto-a3 Exhibit `'A" and islincorporated by this Feference. (ii) Pl tlrinq Owtsion Condi ion No. 16 states• that""If any phasing is proposed, a phasing plan Shall be subject to appro'iil of the-'Planning Coy aission prior to Assuance of,building permits." (ii,10 Western Properties has filed 'an application for the approvai � of a phasing plan for Conditional Use ?ermit No. '88-12 is described in. the t;t1e at` this Resolution Hereinafter .n; this ,Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Psrmit re4'..est is referred to as "thc' application". t'- (iv) On the 30th of" Hover'+ber;; 1968, tNe ?fanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduct d and coneluded i duly noticed public hearing on the application and adopted `its,Resolui�ion Nd.-88-236 approving a phasing plan subject to sec-isiP,i rond:'2ions. (v) All lcgal prerequisites td'the adoption of this Rescj'ation have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, T.'-..REFORE, it is hereby, found, determined and resolved by. the Planning Cawission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This' COMMiS5ion hereby specifically finds that all oi'`ther facts setforth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and cor.ect. 2. Based upon substantial`vvidepa presented, to.this Commission during the above-refere red public hearing on NovembNr .7U, 193,i' including written and oral staff reports, together with public ,testj='ny, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:. (a) ;she appiic�tian .applies � property located at the northeast Corner"of�Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard idth a street frog Cage of t2,700 feet and lot depth of`#1,44A feet.ak is presently unimprQved,'and . ,. ' Pt Al ING CGWISSIO F,.;{EtbLUTIurt N0 Sfl ? i5A r CUP-fl8 12 =`TERRA YI:5TA`T0'U, CENTER 1" December 14', Page 2 (b) The oroperty`ta' the north;of the' subject site �s. vacant land, the pr4�perty to end',:south of'thac site consists .af'an office coiaplQX, '. the property!-to tht east ;is vacant land`and `the property ,to -7the_iiest'f; ' entertainment/office cgitplex. Based upnn -he substantial evi,! nce presented is this,,romisttiOn during the. above public hearing and ,ponAth Specific findings°of ' . facts set forth. in paragraph 1"a,nd 2 a`boVe, this goWnis,�ion:`-hereby: finds and concludes as. follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with' 'the deneral 'Flan,`;the objectives of i 0,14,Qqvelopment Cade, and the }srposizs of the dirtirict in.wht 0 :the site is locate;. (b) That. the pr000sod u*e," together with; She c 'applicable, thereto .wild not. 6e detrimental .to• the'`oublic•,,;hezl'th, safety, ,or' wci'fare„ ar, mi3;,erially lii.' -ions,to propet'tjes,, ' or imp^oveiaent�'in the vicinity. (.C). That'the'proo'oied usi= rompiies w ,- each of`the` ; t,f appl9cable`�irovisic�s oP' the Orveiepscar Code 4. This 6�aissiarr, hereby finas .and certif ti?t the. proJeF: hay r' been :rev:_ued anti:<, rt�sidered in`crsmpliance with they' " inn#a Environi �:,'ral Quality. Act o9"rn further, this .:Coi<aais ��i issued' a Negative ' Declaration uir Apr ?' 13,,1998. I 5. aased upon the.find%gs. and conclusions set forth 3es par'aarai�h ' I, 2, 3, and 4'above,,•.,th s Commission hereby�apprnves thi,�ip"plicaioiorr subject N 'zo each and every condition, nt farth;'brlow o-nzi i,tcarporafAd hureip by this reference: " (a) perimeter landscnp=a g including!�t.deivalk, shall bt'provided alum) -Haven.Aamue; �olrn Center_Qri:re, Foothill Souieyard R�z : Spruce AA=6 at q:�~ titO of Phase I improvemnts: (b) `Th€ buil0'�vigt pad 'area firY Ftajor-2 and aadjacent retail ,shops sh l l ;t °teinporar.i ly irrigated and:.of anted jai th.'g' ndco , if :thy bfiilding permits:for ;RajoO."Z and IdjaddR ,retail � ahap5 Have not teen issued;prior 'fiA theaccuoancy.of-�9a3ar l ei+:idjaetnt ketril shep5. co„��itioi+u ,of approval-`as Coii' ons r 4tA18 shall .a pp 1 J Y• r .` ids..; ~`traffic signal at Ndveei Avenue. and FOthtAa ll ,"be mi difiesl and,,upgradeii _ d � �^ fi' ♦♦rl� � i �"')M,�.' PLANMI!iG C0144ISSIOL.' ,:SOLUTION NO. 88-236A CUP 8$42 TERRA VISTA 701,11 CENTER r. December 14 1988 !; Page'3 (e) Construction shall proceed in. conformaance with the approved phasing plan' attached hereto as "Exhibit "B", and, incorporatd Iby this reference, , and described,` in p3wt, below: (1)_ ase I shall include. complezz.�n of H3Ven%Foothill darner, treatmenv,.incl4ding the vountain and trellis, prior to`:occupancy of Major-1. (t� •C 'sding$ "A-1", 11P-2% and "B" s'rall` be under substantial,construction"E'll r to occl•pancv cf'Major- : 1. l3) Building,'"V and "Y" .shall be. submitted for building permits prior to occupancy"of Major-1. `(4) Uui l di ngs "S" and "P" and Pads' 1, 2, and 3 shall: be under substantial construction prior, to occupancy of Nsjor-2 and the westerly plaza "shall b cainpic4ed ccncurrent1y as.:Phase £I_ M Three significant works of art shalt be tiaced in the three major plaza areas,.as follows: (I) One at ` the Foothill/Haven corner, plaza, to be installed:prior'to occupancy of Major-1. (2) .One in "the •plsia area' een tAbjars 1 and, 2, to be :installed prior to occupancy of liajor-'s. (3) One in the plaza adjacent.to-the movie theaters, to be installed prior tit� uupancy.of the theaters. I 6. , The Secretary•to ties. Cortraissi N;�'sha11 certiry te, the ado4tion �• �f this Resoluti,3n. APPROYEL.:AND A�LIPiSD TtIS'14T�i DAY OF gECEMBER, 1989. M PLANNING CO ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Larry- r� ATTEST; Mary r { t -v f • Zi I t. ' f CUP 8?-i2 EXHIBIT "C" 1 -REV I ED PHASING PLAN'AND STATUS OF PROJECTS Pre as; New Status If Phasing Phan Phasing Plan Work- PHASE I Target Yarget R1mQst Complete dward Cineota In -Plan..'Check Edward' Cinema E Bldgs" A & 8 B �.gs: A,& B Almost complete B1dgs�X & �Y F1dgs_.�,� & Y InP1.an•.Check (2-9Q) Bldgs V & W Bldgs_V & W Ili-Plan Check (1 g0)' r --- Chi1 's (Pad 1) In Plan Check MPHASE II Mervyn's Ur tucto in` ? Bldg El Bldg'E & G. Final :Bldg_Design Condi;t'ioral; Approved By DRC 12/1G/89, Chili's (Pad 1) (,MBtove to Phase I) ---- Fidg R ,dg R "S� tj'. Final Bldg Design " _. ronditional Reproved; DRG 12/19/89 . Bldgs S b P .'to' Phase .III)° ----- Pads 2,,3 i7 -Ve to Phase -- Courtyard adjacent Courtyard adjacent Finai Design„ to Mervyn's q, : MervynA`s Conditionally- Approved by, DRC�1 �19/E9, PHASE III 'Major 3 Major'"3 (Mo_ntgomery Wards')` r Major 4 Major 4 (Chi l d`s,Yorl.d) Building L 6uilding C Building M (TBA)` Buil .ing,M Buildidg M" Building'N Pad 4 Pad 4 Building K Building K Building G (Mova,.to.Phate II) Building 3' (Move,to 'Phase"'II) Building Q (Move'to'Phase 1I) --- Pads `2, .3 III 7 ` 9 r 7 N a Lw w g y �� t a js aa�ae : a a�a3a = aaaae • _- ►='° ''' do --- .. . II 4-.i r 71 54 , cp�,.: 4 44, i 4 J E ti t 1 3r". N3A" I1 r f ,L � %� 1 f 1 k7•£ RESOLUTION NO. 881436B A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONSA `PLANNING COMMISS1oil AMENOIN6 ;THE PHASING PLAN FOR,CONDITIONAL,USE PERMIT NO. �t 88-12 FOR TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, AN INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SHOPPING 1':FNTER ON 71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE. NORTHEAST CORNER OF :HAVEN AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDIOGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-OF 06, AND 18. A. Recitals'. OY On the 30th'of November, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 88-236 :approving a.phasing, _, plan for the Terra Vista Towne Center subject to`specifi4d:conditions. Nesterm Properties, has filed a' request to modify the phasing plan for Clip 887I2 as dese gibed in the' title of this Rel&�iution. (iii) On the 14th of March, 1990, the Planping'`•Commission of the' Ci.y of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed ,public hearing on the application and concluded said 'nearing an that date... (iv) All legal prerequisites to the 4doption .of this Resolution have occurred. ti B. Resolution. NOW,.f,THEREFORE, it is hereby found,.determined and resolved' by the Planning Cohan ssion of the City of Raiacho Cucamonga ais;follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically, Finds th?t;al1 ofe'�;he facts set forth ir, the Recitals, Part A .af this Resolution are true and correct.` 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March' 14, 1990, ,including 4�• written and oral staff ' reports, together with public testimony, this Commission herby specifically finds as follows: (a) The appli.cirtion applies to' property, located at the northeast corner of Haven Ar,enue and Foothill Boulevard.with a street frontage j of t2,700 feet and lot depth of t1,440 feet and is a shopping center presently under construction; and (b), The property to the north of the subject site is vacant - land, the property -to the south of that site consistis of en office complex, the property to the. east' is vacant land, and the property,'to the, west is an entertainment/office complex. 3. Based^13pon the substantial evi .-nce presentey to this Coamissibl { d - urin the c;" , _ g above referE.nced ,public hearing and:upofi the soecffic finQings of. . facts set forth in par4 graphs I and c above, this Go ission hereby finds"and concludes as follows. .� PLANNtti6 COt4WISS�ON RESDLUTIDN ND e38-23GB ^ OdASING PLAN.Fbil CUP'8542 - MiiRH. March 14, 1990 Page 2' + _ a) That thrt��proposed use �s �n accord with_the Gener'hal Pianti the Terra Vita .Plan-ned C+�mmurrity,.the objectives of the Dofa16pment.Cid ''and. the purposes -of,the dist3 ict in: whi4h the`•site is'"loeated (b) . That .the 'be. use, "together w�is the ceditians �- applicable `thereto, kwill. riot be.detrimental to 'the pubic heC1Ch, rety„ or warfare, or 'materiaily in�u,rigus .tc� properties or .improvements in", the, vicinity. 4' (c) Tha2 the proposed use 'complies with each of the,appltcable . provisions of the Ddvelopme12 r,odpi and the Tiara.Vista,?tarined_Community. �• 4. This C, mission hereby finds and certifies That the rro apt has been reviewed' and cc�ns�dered in` ca�pt,iance ,With the Cal.i,Fornia Env ronmentah Qualify Act of 197U'.''and; furthers this Commission has .issued 4J Negative Declaration on April :27, 1988 ti� _ `` 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fct�th in uara9ra�hs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this, Com; ;jssion here6y_,aporoves the`tp lication ,subject to each! and -every condlVori"set 4r.,6-be1:Qw,. aa' (a). Perttna�er landscaping including sidewttk; ,..shalI be-provided. along Haven Avenue, 1Town,Certer.Drive, FoathiI FOulevard, and Spruce"!§venue at the time of Phase I rnWrovements. ` Jo) Ttre building"pad area for Major-2 and adjacent retail shops shall� be temporarily irz�igated and planted .wii,h gro' cover '�f the buitdi;ng permits for Major-2'4nc+ adjacent retail ;shops-have not,been5 issued prior `to gat the occupancy_of Major 1 sand adjacent-retail (c.) All conditions of 1� Zroval„ as contained, - in Resniutions 88-75 and 8&418lshall apply.; '.+ (d) Jhe existingll-traffic signal at Haven- Avenue and Fdothill Boulevard shall be modified'and�_�i0, raded. (e) tonstructiort. shall proceed;+n`Cor,forma�ce u�th the approved phasingavr=attached hereto as Exhibit `8", and in,,orporated by this referenct, .anai descP tied, in part below-' (i)- Phase U :5ha1T, include =_C,mpl-etio�r iff: Haven/FooPhi}1 corner„treatm�ni .includin� the fountain and trei;lis, ; pri©ll:iO accuganey Of Hajor4 (2) Buildings.. NA r1!" MA `and, W. shall'-be undep sribstantial construction prior to occupancy of3 Ma3or�1. (3) ,. .Buiiding "X° and;; "C, shall "be'submi'tted fow bulls ng perm its..pnior to occupancy ofi Major=l, 4� V ! PLANNING CQriMISSiON RESOLUTION"NO 88=2366 PHASIN&"pLAN'�FOR CUP 68 1:Z; . WESTERN March 14; "1990 'Page 3 ;4) Buildings E, G, J, R,, and Q and Pad. 1 shall 'be under substantial construction prior to occupant ,,' of Major-2. (5) Major-2 and the westerly plaza shall be. Comol'4t0d ,. 41, concurrently as. Phase I1 (f). Bull dings S and P and. Pads 2 and 3 shall be' under substantial construction prior>to occupancy of Majors-3 and/or -4 whichever ,. occurs first. (g) Three .significant works ofs�t shall he ,placed in the: three major plaza areas,;as follows: (1) One at the Foothill/Haven corner, plaza, to be installed prior to occupancy. of Major-1. (2) One, it the plaTa.area between;-Ajors-1 and -2, to be installed prior to occupancy:'of Ma,ior-2. (3) One in the plaza adjacent to the movie. theaters-r .to '. be initalied prior to<•occupancy,as the,thEaters.,; 6. The Secretary to this.Commission 'shall certify to:,the adaption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOP%D THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TF1E CITY OF R,P.NCHO CUCAMONGA BY: I . Larry T. McNiel,'Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bulier,.Secretar I, Brad Buller, ;secretary of the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho . Cucamonga, do h.,.r p, certify that the forego%4, ,Resolution was drily a �d . ' regularly introdu6ad, passed, and adopted by'the Planning Corrgi-sMon of the City-of Rancho Cucamonga, at a vegular meeting of the Planning 6mmissign,held on the 14th day of Mar�h,'1990, by the following vats=to-wit:,. f AYES: CGMMISSIGNERS: �xt NOES: CuMMISSL©NERS. < ASSENT: OP�LMISSIONERS:, r AA CITY OF,iANCHO WCAMONGA'4 STAFF REPORT;, DATE. .March,l4, 1990 TO: "Chairman and Members of the Planning.'.Commission FROM: Barrye R..: Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Civii,";Cngineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO :DEVELOPMENT REIIEW! 88-01 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP '. LIS41. - o - A request, deter TfiF comp a on o •e _vi en - .venue; median landscaping `for the development of a medicaS center on 'iG"acres of land in the Mixed Use (NiO) District within tree Terra 'Vista Planned Convmnity, located at the southeast corner, of, Milliken Avenue and Church Street - APM 227-151-13 and 14 I. BACKGROUND: Development Review 8841 and Tentative Parcel Map 11341 were appr76M'Sy the PI anni ng Cotes ssi on .on 14arch'9,, 1988... Parcel Map 11341 was recorded October 28 "1 988, Construction of;tWtedical center is nearing completion and ;he street improvements are in with the, exception of landscaping iW:.the medians. The applicant is requesting that the condition of approval requiring full width construction ot.Milliken Avenue, including, a lapdscaped median, be modified to allow occupancy of the medical 'center pri)r"to completion of the median landscaping,. The applicant's itt),.;, 'is -attachsd as E�.hi bi t "B". The specific condition of-approval in quostion is'.:shown on Eahioit "C". However,the. condition itself does not state when the improvements are to: be completed. That is governed by City Council, Resolution No. 88-aW (Ex:)ibit °D"). , II. ANALYS1ge The applfcant is requesting that En�lneering Condition No. 4, w-Ficn -requires the Construction of Milliken.Avenue 'including landscaped median", be modified such that occupancy of the hospital can be released prior to`complet#on of the madiar. landscaping. Their letter raises three. issues which are ds follows: 1. ThewpllIIcant feels that the City's proportional :release policy apgglt_G'&. ucF.sou - x oes o allow,-energy connections (occupancy release) to:,.. be L made prop6rtionate to the completion of improvements for developm.n s containing multiple buildings.' The Developer is requesting total occupancy, release for both buildings comprising .Phase. 1., of, i~ha hospital master plan. If the total IrAtter plan; which;°shoals future ' buildings£ is considered as a p)'rject, then the propor,,onate release 'provision will. allow 4efeOral of the 6*, letion a ,Y the median ase 2 occupancy release.landscaping untilPh ITEM l N-ANNING:COtMISSION STAW REPORT DR 88-01'AND TPH 11,341'--LEW,15 HOMES'MANAGEMENT CORP., MARCH 14, 1990 ; PAGE-2 2. The median design will, not be completed urtil-issues such as t1a . ., drip irrigatioa cril era and traffic v s on cowmen s are_reso vda, Y S e dri p de a s were G SM a or Ae app . can - an scT ap`e:architect the day =after the plan check, meeting on-E February 2t', 1990 City staff, did ask that the Traffic comments not be -6ddrerned until. staff reviewed them with the Traffic Divisio!:: Internal discussions ha-ye been held and,a;policy mema,is forthgomitg. 3.' Practically every other project in Terra`Vista is%slso tied .to the Comp a bn. a `aFixenT omp a on h wqy Avenue, from Base ne Road to roo r : oulevard is a conditiba. "approval' �,ar all projects within "arQa 10.of the Terra Vista Street >Imps^ivement r. Implementation Poi;iCy (Exhibit "E"). 5! Once again Lewis Homes Management Corporation is'irt- danger of not making a critical construction _+-zad3ine"and is asking for;relief,from compoeting a condition of approval'. For. the .rocord, staff 1orwarded,a copy ot;,the Milliken Avenue 'median landscaping master.plan to LRWIs .Homes in eot�,fy September of. 1989. Staff.agreed to;a Lewis Homes. request to trei'c' the landscaping between Foothill Doulei►ard ant; Base Line Road as a':ti�Molt, package. On Cctober 2, 1989,,L^4w`ii Homes i'w icated`that Working drawings would be available in 60 days.;. During December of 1989 staff rejected an alternate master plan concept proposed by Lewis' landscape architect. ' On February.2, 19gO, Lewis-Homes submitted;their median package for review, on, a rush basis, two months later than Originally indicated. Com ots were returned;on February. l5 and staff met with Lewis' landscape architect on Feb.r� � to review the ca��enent5 %he revisions were extensive because the.ap ,.21p#iCant'did not follow the City,'s master plan provided earlier.'-, During the preparation of this report, staff de cided to,i', eld.review the site. It was noticed that the Church 'Street median 'landscaping was also not complete. Because the Developer did not, request defcrral of this item, insufficient time was available to research the reasons why it is not complete. However, if the Coahission'should decide to defer the Milliken, kvenue median landscaping, then it willbe necessary.to de the same fer Church Street. } III. CONCLUSION: The conditions of approval specifically include a,landscaped median in t3:a,Mill iken Avenue°street improvements. Staff;cannot'ro ease F occupancies until the conditions.of approval ha: been wait, On the other hand, the balance of the required street improvette have.been cam pieted and, as the applicant has pointed,but,` ,any other Lewis`Homes projects have been sfidlirly conditioned, Therefore, ultimate completion of the landscaping la reasonably certa(n. PLANNING COMMISsiou STAFF,R.CP0RT OR $$-Di-AND'.TPM I2341;;-. i61S HQBSES_Mpta�lCa�iSENT MARCH I4, t490 x' RAGE s II,e Planning Corission appears 'to` have 'ago .options t ) d2ny""ths modification ryquest,. or (2; add a,condition spec fytn ;that t#3c mEdian _ island landscaping be„deferred:until`Phase E of the proe 't, r W. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommen�ts that the,.,caning' Cor�aisiloh rdnsi-der. 411 'input and elements of thL conditiotl siodification,µ`feg3kst,° and oither-deny or - approve the= request'"through . adoptibn o'f the appropriate ;resolutions attached. Respectfully submitted, 9arryyee Hanson Senior-Civil Engineer� , BnH.BN:'sJm - Attach ntFI Site'Alan"(£xhiibit Applicant's Letter.(ExFtibi '"� � Conditi ils of'Approval (Exhib t °CAI w:ty Council Resolution No. W;#,SV (Exhibit, MD") Urra Vista Street 19ra4iiiit4mplementatio,n 4-, Policy (Exhibit "t j ResO utior. Of,Appr+d4al Resolution of Denial :3 (F�- r � _._...... tea. I Ili P� Lt L 1 Phase 2 T'aui l cdi n�s CITY OF . rrmL RTC�IO SIT OI�1(aA fit' : , ITS 4, fLewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain Av—aue I PO.Box 6701 Upland,,Wfornia 91785 714/985-0971 FAX:714/9811-9799 9110 f� February 26., 1990 FEBM 109a," Mr. `Brad Buller ' Planning director City of F„+(acho-Cucamonga - Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Parcel Map 11341, DRSO-01 Dear Brad: Although we goy a late start on the desi=^a. because of my"not realizing that the Milliken median landscape,would have to be 100 complete for hospital,occupancy (11 thought since they expect to build a later phase,the City's propoiFilo gal release policy would allow occupancy of the cu rent phase bksed on the work we have already completed), and the Al;liken landscape design not being settled .until after street plans were. approved we thought we could et our fans g, completed, and. g P _ approved, by paying 'overtLie plan check fees, in time too complete the medians by the hospital's contemplated msd harch occupancy. However, .last week's plan check comments and Tom:Della.� .i'ials subsequent conversation kith staff have raised some 'doubts in our minds about getting the. approval LI time to complete the work. So`we thought it prudent'to ask to be on thy: next available Planning Commission agenda in case a mod!F.;atioz of that conditionis required., As I understand it, some design cri+- ria,;(drip irrigation) are not firm yet, and Tom's trying to at that clariY,',ed. Also, although we tried to follow r<JM•s approved plan for=another section of Milliken and dis nssed= Any chantg(ts with>the staff along the way, the checker's comments were far more extensive than we had expected. One comment was that Traffic wfinted no`shrubs over 12 inches high, but ve were told to ignore that,and proceed- bused on delays we-We had on some other projects, thatz,makes us a ' little nervous, It seems.to me that instead of"�us rushing through the design while there are still unresolved issues, we might be better off, since there is no public safety issue ` Mr. Sr,�d Boller February ?S, 1990 Page; 2 ' involved, to delay completion of the plans"slightly and make �; ! sure that we" have full agreement that; the a--sign, is, as good as it can be before building it.. In any event, Land Concern will have the plans `back in� this week, ,hopf�f�A y to be approved. He hays bid t3ae'j job, out and can start as Soon as plans are signed, but "sino k tx a design we were"required to,follow is tabor inte63ive, 6onstruction will probabs,y take about three weeks Zt; thereore, sQsms, doubtful that; we could-get the laridscapincx,1'404'compieted,;kiy" the time the hospital wants to occupv. their•second bvi.ldin so unless their intention.to build a later phase, can bring the pruportionil release poilipy t<o•beat, we'.il-b4aveTto ask four , modif cati;)n.. As .practically .every other ,pr6j oct in Verra Vista is also, tied to completion''Of Milliken, I ;hope and expect: that the staff would suPpo:.t such a ehairle, so that the hospital's opening wouldn't.be .delayed. by, r,,i cumstances beyond their control. }rr, Enclosed is'our`check in payment of the 398 foe, please put it 'on _-the MLrch' 14 age 3da, if it 4 can-t. be -wo}i`.ad• out administratively. sincerely, LEWIS HOMES MANAGMEM CORR.i Don Thomp,%an y _ _ "•1 LMT:ksk Enclosure cc. Mr, Russ Magulve, City Engineer t. Mo. Carol AxYc 1d, TMC I f ^ u y", / riiiI ks • sties xarpf 6 9ineeringDivislon {1)' Tihe "pr�Jtetted10 bus 'bay on. Church Street shall be relocated easterly outside :of the curb return area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (2) The median island break along Chureh;Street shall be designed and:corstructed with an eastbound left turn ' pocket. s (3), The roject is to drain to the eurrentl P y unimproved Day Creek Channel; therefore, no construction, building or grading permits shall be, 'issued. _until the Terra Ifista Master Plan Storm Drain tine: 6 is constructed,'.concurrently with Phase III of the Day Creek Channel. or, an, alternate drainage disposal system is provided to the satisfaction of the. City Engineer. (4) The following streets shall be constructed full width for the stated limits, zxcept that`Wfei;e parkway improvements may. bo -deferred until development of the adjacent prcfterty:, ' ,. (a) Milliken Avenue from Fuze tine Road to Foothill Boulevard:< inOuding landscaped j medians and is (b) Church Street fray Miiliten Avenue to the east property boundary including landscaped median. (5) A traffic Signal 'shall be constructed at the Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard inteniction l prior to Opening `the north leg to traffic. The design and construction cost shall be ei'igible for credit against the Developer's syst6m Development pp y the_City Council. Fees if so a roved b vim 01 IAOb,, R CFO CUCAMONGA ha OIL 1 : RESOLUTION N0. 68-557 A RESfL►IITI01s OS THE 'tCITY COTINCIL OF tRE CYTY OV R&CHO CUCUS] A.. uT��P.FiIA. APPR09IN0' THE CITE' ErX�!NEEFt',S POLICY REquiRim COMPLETION OF CONDITIONS CS APPROVAL ,o. A, PRERMUISITEr TO EMM�>^�IMMONS NGSd. 7aREFOR2. the pity Council ;o£ t M:City of Rancho" Cucamonga does hereby.reeolve as follows:, No person shall make Comte ctions.:'.Erosa a ,,source of energy, fuel or poser to any building servide equipment which ,is 4egW1'ated b7,technjcal .cedes and for which a permit.is require' sinlesa. in odditioas;'to any.and' all other codes, regulations and ordinances. all improveaeats required by the conditions Of dQvel(,pmant'approval have been completed and accegted' except: by .thQ City:Council. r That is developmenta.;ontainiuH mora. than oa® hnil�limmg or snit. the devUcp=nt may have: enemy, coanectioma; made` to a peresntsga of, those bufldings. or units proportionate to the coaplatioa of iegrov�snts ae, required <, conditions of approval of.development. In no Case: suaZl more .thea ninety-five perc6at-(95%) of the .buildings or units be connected to onergy prior to �.. completion rad acceptagce ; of all improp ants r' 'u ' ad by the aoadit., of approval of dedelopmaat. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPM this:2lst day of Septekber, 1998. AYES: Buquet, King, Wright, -Broens. Stout " NOES: None ABSM: lions Dennia L. tout, _Mayor' ATTES r: Beverly A' AutFfalet, city perk E CITY OVRANCHO CUCAMONGA -• ENGIN.EERING QIVISIAN TiRRAl VISTA.PLANNED COMMLW ITY STREET.IMPROVE 17 IMPLghENT'ATI0i! POLICY Projects within Terna 'Vista shall be required to construct street imRro ements" as follows, A. Streets adjacent -to proye..ts_.sha11 be constructed full Z,width ,to Aptclude- curb on the opOdsite •sides: S. Streets shall be etttended. (full width) off-site. far enough to'--or two means of`access. C. Projects within the individual Development Areas .,shown an the 'map .betaw shall construct the specific street seg"hts designated as follows: AREA STREET SEGN RT " 1 Footht -'Haven to Spruce an® Maven - Foothill'to Town'Center 2 Foothill - Haven to kill l iken' 3 Foothill - Haven tc Rochester 4 -Rochester,- Footh'i11 to Poplar 5 Rochester • Foothill, to Church 61 Rochester,_• Church to'8ase Line 7 aase Line - Mi i;l iken ta`Rochester 8 Base Line - Milliken,to Mou:.€4in View = 9 Same as adjacent area depend upon where'access'is+'taken.: 10 Milliken: - Foothill to Base:L• ne 11 Spruce Foothill to Elrti 12 Most of this. area is already con�itibned or developed. ' 13 Haven r Church-to .Nase Une NOTE: Projects that cross 'area' boundaries (at :corners in particular) : - shall construct all sersats rewired for each affected area. LEGEND R LtAt 19 ®urea boundary a �_ cae� 1 area number �� 1 o ® e �- �, a u� t ' 6 �i OP If: Md4 a a4 tj i t, 1 RBdLbTI014 NO. '88-518 r A RESOLUTION 0, THEiRANCHO, CUCAMONGA+PLANNING COMMISSIOf�, OFiTHE.CITY Of/RANCjO CUCAMONGA APPRt1VING A 'REQUEST'FOR A � ' MODIFICATION, JF *A tONDTTION OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT,';, ° REVa� 8f:=00•'FOR A 10. ACRE MEDICAL,'.:FACTLITY LOCATED AT-" THE SdUTHEAST CORNER.OF'MILLI KEN AVENUE AND CHURCH ST;t' '' , IN THE MIXED.'USE '(MHO)' DISTRICT WITHIN THE..TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUN1TY - AP' 2'27-151-77 ,. A. Recitals. s� (i) On March_9;-1988, the Planning Commissipn adopted Resolution No. 88-51, thereby approvin•g, subject to specified conditions, Development Review 88- 01, which rovades.for P . . the develo went of a medical f � �' - P_ ac 1-it on 10 � acres of land wifhin •thal Mixed_ Use (MHO) District within the Terra Vista Planned Community. (ii) On February 26 1990,; a request was filed_:by_ Lewis Hones s Management Corp. tolmedify the zondition of a,p—ovaT'requiring the,completion of median 'island t kndscaping within Milliken'' Avenue prior:_to occupancy,-of Phase 1 of the proje. . ,. (iii) On� Marct,'14, 1990, the Planning C!mmassion of the City of • Rancho. Cucamonga conducted a .ddly':noticed public hearing on the application',' and concluded said hearing on that date. j;''• (iv) All legal prere'quisites to the*adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B., : Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby. found, determined -and resolved' by` the Planning Commission'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This C mmission hereby specific,ily finds that all of'the facts set forth in the Red,ta'is,;Part A, of this Resolution.'ire true, and coriect. 2. Based upon :substantial evidence' presented to this''Commiss an during the above-referencei_'public hearing an :Parch 14,' 1990r incldding, written and oral staff reports•, together with public : testimony,• this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows' (a) ' That the project is,a phased project.cons'isti;ng of a Phase 1 and a Phase 2; ,and (b) ; That bhe deferral of the completion of the. landsca'png within the Milliken Avenue and 'Church_ .Street, 'medi.an z Until'•Phase, 2 of -the project i5 consistent with City Council• Resolution No: 88-557; • x � �II it t 3 + ly• , 1' i% fi y 3O f F r , �l RESOIIIT%ON N0. 86-557 A 48SCLUTION OF: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CEICAMNGA. , CALIFORNI& APPROVSNG THE CITY ENGINEE21 S POLICY REQUIRM COMPLETION OF CUNDITIoNS OF,APFROVAL AS A PREREQUISITE''TO ENERGY' CONVIECT1,12 S NOW, THEREFORE, 'the Citq Council of the City of Rancho Cucamoaffia does hereby resolve as foZ3oa�a: No Pit , shall mika .connections Pram a source ,of- '�Gnargyj fuel., or power to any .buildimgaeraico aquipment,. which is regulated t¢chnoai codes.' and for which a pmrrsit is required unless, in add3tio 'to auy _and ell. other codes, regulations gad ordisencea, eli. irtprovamenka rrquirad by thu c®aditioas of development approval, have,been, aai eccnptad by th® "City.'.Counci except: That is developmonta containing mor- . than one '"buiidiag or unit. ilia may have energy cor�actione mach to .a.�-p®rcentage of those`bu:Udings. or units proportionete.eo tha completion-of improv eats. as requi �d conditions of approval of development. Ia na:'ca®a'sbs3l'fore tf disc ct;aetyuired percent (95$) oY th® bu3ldiag& or units be connected 'to. ®aerKy prior to p acceptance of rf.% impraysnaats 'required by too coaditioaa of completion and approval of developaaant.. r PASSED, AFPF0410, and,ADOPTLD this 21mC dey ai°-Septaaber, 19St3• AYES: Buq"t.,' Ki g. 69rigiat, Brava, Stan$ NOES: F7one: ABSMIT: Nose Dannia L.. tout. tf or, I ATTEST: VAG i Beverly Aathe2ee,z Ctey C3 s CITY 4F RANCHO CtlCAMOPBIl - ENGINEEitING IIIVISION . TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMUNITY STREtT" fi�ROVEMr Y LOaTATION, P0Lia Projects within Terra Vista shalt be required to construct street i�provaeats as .follows: r; A. Streets adjacent •id projects' shalt co be' nstructed-fu11 width to in Curb ory the opposite, side's. B. Streets shall be' 'exteddeo (full Width) off-site far eno means of.laccess. ugh to provide two C. Projects 'within the individual Development Areas�, h' n on the map below shall corsstructthe specitic 'street"<segments designated as "follows. AREA . STREET SEGMENT' 1 Foothill' - haven to Spruce 'and Raven - Foothi1) to Town ;Canter 2 Foothill. Haven to.M lIiken 3 Foothil] - i"avers to' Roeh' r 4 Rochester -Foothill to Poplar, 5 'orhester Foothill,to,Church . =6 " Rochester - Church to,,Base L�3no 7 Base Line - Milliken't;o Rochester. 8 Base'0 -,-.Milli en to'Mountain"l!,idw 9 Same as adJacent area depefld;ing uj on where' access` is taken.Foohllto_93eL10 Milliken ine t1 "Spruce - Foothill to Elm' •. 12 Most of this area is alread,� conditioned or developed. 13 'Haven Chureh o Base Line NOTE: Projects that cross "area boundaries (at' Cot. particular). shall'constriact altxsegnts required .for eaeh.affec;ted'area, LEA Area boundary; i area number a' L4i v Lee Lm" ® w Lit Op P, o�L'Lto I ! a� !Isos f� SIYlB7 � ! a RESOLUTION NO. 18-516 :r A RESOLUTION OF)JHE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION OF. ,THE CITY OF'RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A , MO0iFICATI6N OF -A CONDITION OF, PM APPROVAL FOR'DEVELOENT = REVIEW .88.` FOR A' 10''ACRE MbD CAL FACILITY LOCATED'AT, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER.,OF MILLIK"EN'AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET IN THE MIXED USE' (MHO)'DIStRI'CT WITHIN THE; TERRA VISTA PLANNED.COMMUNITY.- APN227-151=77 A. Recitals. On March 9; '198.8,•Lhe. Planning ,Comrni;ss,ion ado'pted,'Resoiution No. 85-51, 'thereby approving, subject :to specified .,canditions, ,Development, Review .88-01j which provides:for the development of a.medical .facil•ity on 10'' acres of land within the. Mixed:Use '(hiHO) ;District ''within: the Terra Vista Planned Community. •. (ii) On. February: 26, 1990, a request was filed by Lewis Homes Management Corp. to modify`the condition,of approval requiting thecGmpletion of median island 'landscaping within' Mjllz'en.''gvenue, prior to occupancy' of Phase I of the project. (iii); On March 14, 1990; the, Planning Commission of .the"laity of Rancha Cucamonga conducted a.,,duly noticed public hearing on ,the application . and'concluded-said hearing on that dale:' (ivJ All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred: B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it, is hereby found,'determined and resolved 'by ;the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically"f;sds that.`ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals,,Part A, of this Resolution,',ai a true and correct., 2. Based', upon �suhstantial evfdence. presented to: t►fisCommisson during the above-referenced public hearing on March 14,: 1990,,' including written and oral ,'staff reports;. together With public " testimony, this' Commission hereby.specifically finds as follows: (a) Thal; the project is a phased project.consisting of a Phase 1 and'a Phase 2; and (b) That the deferral of the completion of the landscaping ` within the Miliiken Avenue and`Church.Street` median .,until .Phase 2 of. the. ' project .is consistent with City Council:'Resolution No. 88-557 l L PLANNING COMMISSION.,'RE5, ,L TiON N0.;88 51B: DR 88,01 AND_TPM 1341 =„LEWIS`, BIOMES MANAOEMENT,CORP. MARCH 14, 1;59,0 PAGE 2 .r 3. ° Bape'd'upon the'substantial evidence presented to this,Comm'ssion during the;A Ave-referenced public. hearing� an. ,upon the specific fipdin 'nf facts,;set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above„ this CommissiorFhereby;finds.and' concludes as. followst (a) That • project:, is consistent with; ,..the iGeneral :Plan,.'' Development Code, and specific;-plan,; and + tb)i The design or improvements`of the project is consistent With the Gene:al Plan,•6.velopment Code,:and specific plans; and. . (c) `The site - is phyysically ;suitable for the _ type of. development,;proposed; -and. (d) The design: of the` prc3ect is not ' Likely - o cause substantial environmental"'damage `and, avoidable injury to humans and wildlife- or their hab at; "and,= (e) The .projeci is not Likely to cause serious pu�lLic al h problems; and ' (f) The. design:of tEie `project will- not° conflict>with any easement acquired by the publ ic,at large; now of recor, , for.access through''or, use of the property'within the priposed subdivision, t: 4. This .,commission*- finds and c(rtifies that the project has been reviewed and :considered in compt�ance with the California Environmental Quality Act;' of 1970 and that a Negative Declaration Was issued on, March 9, .1.99E.; 5. llased< pon the findings and conclusions: set-forth in`paragraph 1, 2 and 3, above, this Cor�ission> hereby modifies the;Resolutic Nc� 88-51._by adding .a subsection (c) ,tj,condition No.'4 under Engine6 irig'DwIsion:to read as follows: (c) The . landscaping within the 4�urch ' `Street and ' Nil lf�en. Avenue median islands.shall 'be, completed prior, to occupancy,';release of the buiIdings within Phase 2-of the project. N rr 6. All other conditions as contained in Resolution Nos- 88-51 ,and 88-51A shall apply. 7. The Secretary to this Commissib� shall Certify, to the adoption. of this Resolution.- _ ', `• a T_ RUINING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0, 88-518` DR N8.-01 AND TPM_11;341 - .LEWU F6Ad MANAGEMENT CORP. MARCH, 14� 1990 , PAGE 3 ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS.14TWD Y_OP.MARCH. 1990 ➢LANNING'COMMISSTON OFtTtiE C1TY gF, RANCHO CUCAMONGA B F' Larry T. McNiel,,:Chairmaq ATTEST: L Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bulier, Secretary of one Riannsng,,tommrssign of the City: of',Rancho. Cucamonga, do hereby.certify that the foregoing, Resolution was'; •'duly and _ regular''y.introduce'd,`gassed; and, adopted 6y.`the Plaitq%gn Commission �ofrthe City r, Rancho'Cucamonga;-'at a,`regular meeting of the,►�lanning'Commission held' on V,.e 14th;day gf March;'1990, 'by the 1ollptiing,xote-tp-wjt AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES c COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS, F I i 1 _ f f t RESOLUTION u. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA P LAN N A GJ COMMISSI0� OF'THE CITY aF RANCHO 'CUCAMONGA DENYING:.A REQUEST FORA ;_ MODIFICATION; OF A• CONDITION OF­APPROVAL,FOR •DEVEL.OPMENT' REVIEW:88-1U .FOR'.A 10 `ACRE ,MEDICAL `FACILITY LOCATED AT ;4 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF.NILLIKEN AVENUE AND,CHURCH,STREET IN_THE MIXED USE"(MHO) Dl$tRI:CT WITHIN THE JORAsVISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY - APN 22t-151-17 A. Recitals.• (i) On March,,;9, 1988, the Planning .Commission adopted Resolution No, 88-51, '��ereby approving, subject_ to specified conditions, Development Review 88-01. which provides for,.the de;ielopment of'a medi al facicity ;on 10 acres of land within. the Mixed>`Use (MHO) District within ?the Terra Vista Planned Community. �t (ii) i On February. 26, 1990, a request_was filed by, Lewis Homes Management .Corp. to modify the condition of'ap.provai. Eequiripg the completion of median islaod landscaping wi'th.in Milliken Avenue prior; to occupancy of Phase I of the project. +' (ii;i) Om March 14, 1990, ,the Planning Commission of the City. of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing ,on the application and concluded said hearing on that-date.. (iv) Al'1 legal, prerequisites to the adoption of this.,-Resolution have :occurred. B. Resolution. NOW', THEREFORE, it "is hereby found; determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City,of Rancho Cucamonga as follows ,: 1. : This rCommi,ssion hereby specifically finds that`a1l Of':the'facts ` set 'forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution-`are true•and"correct. 2. Based%upon substantial evidence presented to this-'Commission during the -above-referenced public hearing n"r; March 14, 1990, ;, inelp, ng written and oral staff' reports, -together with public;:testimony, this. , Commission;hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That* the Developer did receive sufficient;nctice '.of the requirement; and (b) That the requirement ;is, consistent with•City '#11ty; and' . (c) That the requ 'remerit 'is necessary for the'°develop nt. r t PLANNING CO�iISSION�RESdLUTION NO: DR M;01 ANO TPM.11341 - LEWIS t10MES MANAGEMENT CORP. MARCH' 14, 1990 PAGE 3. Based`>upon the substantial , vi4en' presented to this Commission , during the a$ove-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in'paragraphs 1„and,2 a6ove, this,Camnlissian h'6eby finds;and concludes as follows: rt (a) :That the .median island jandscaping within. Milliken'Avenue shall be completed p�^ior,to release of occupancy of Ph se 1'of the pro3ect,: 4. Based` upan the findings 'And ,conclusions; 'set forth in par '_s agraph 1, 2' and 3hove.: this Commission heresby denies the requested, condition modification and,reaffirms Resalu.tian NOS.,!88-51 and 88-51A. > 5.. Thn cretary to this Commissian shall .'certify to t P a'ioption of this Resolution, r '. APPROyED AND ADOPTED''; IIS 14TH DAY OF';MARCH,41990. \'�- F PLANNING COMMISSION'S Of; THE,CITY.Op RANCHO CUCA1 ORGA BY: Larry T. MCNiel, Chairman �1 ATTEST: Brad Bul ler, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, .Secretary of the Planning CommissianF of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereb„_,certify that the "foregoing Resolution ,was duly and regularly introduced -passed, .and adopted' by. the'Planning'Commission of .the City of Rancho Cucamonga, t a regular meeting�af the 21anning Commission held On the 14th day'off"" ch,,1990, by th'e following vote-to-wits. - AYES- CO"SI ONE:RS: NOES: COOVISSIONERS: ABSENT,: COMMISSIONERS: F, y' 4F �� YF" ft j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j STAFF REPORT {1i DATE: March 14, 1990 1 TO: Chakeman and Members of the Planning to FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, SenigriPlanner SUBJECT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 0-01-' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan by adding pharmacy use in the Specialty Commercial District of Subareas: 1, 2, and ;3; clarifying the intent.of wordings in several areas of the Specific Plan text for consistency purposes; clarifying' the Development District'anO.standards for the area at the end of San Bernardino Road in'Subarea 2; and modifying the p A6t palette for the Foothill Boulevard landscaped median island. _ I. ABSTRACT: The, purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to review the proposed modifications tg the .Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. A, Resolution recommending approval to the City Council has been attached for` Commtssion review and formal action. Ii. O; December 1,3, 1089, the Planning-, Commission considered a proposal to add the land use category of Drug Stores and Pharmacies to the Specialty Commercial District. 'At that meeting, the Commission'determined that .Drug.Stores and Pharmacies would be ,an appropriate land`.use subject to a Conditional Use Permit, and directed staff to initiate and prepWe'an amendment,to the .Foothill Boulevard. Specific Plana Staff has taken this opportunity to expand the parameters of the amendment to sinclude several housekeeping items. These clean up items are listed in the section below with the appropriate discussion for each item. I`II. LIST OF PROPOSED CHANGES: A.: Cowunity features(Section 5.4.); Add Klusman House as one of the community features and notable structures to page 11-5.7;and as;shgwn in Exhibit "A" and to read as follows:.,., ITJF r y/`f PLANNING COMMISSION STAPF REPORT' FOOTHILL BLVD. SPECI,IC PLAN AW'NDMENT 90-01 March 14, 1990 Page Section 5.4.17 Klusman House (southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, 8841 Foothill Boulevard), This " residence is a two-story structure and of Spanish Colonial Revival style. It is characterized by low-pitch hipped;roof with red tile in an irregular pattern* polygonal tower, narrow long windows, 'IS" shaped molding, and multi-pane Windows.' B. The Alignment of Red Hill Road (Section 7 1 1):, On May 3, 19891 the Cit.,; Council adopted Resolution No. 89-205 approving the final alignment For._''Red,, Hill. Road. . This proposed Amendment I& to modify the language and the graphics on pages 11-7.3 and 7.8 of,. the circulation concept plan showing the realigned Red Hill Road as shown in Exhibit "B." C. Streetsitaae Design (Section 1— Center Median Island. The proposed Amendment is to change the plant palette from rolling turf berms domin ated by informal clusters of Crape-`Myrtles and Carolina Laurel Cherry trees to Bosques of Crape Myrtles under planted with Needlepoint Iv,. at median nose areas f flanking a formal row of Rhus Lancea-underplan?ed with fiowering-shrubs, as shown in Exhibit "C-I and C-2." ' The Engineering 'staff will be available at the meeting to answer questions for the Commission. 2. Spacing of trees` within the Activity Center. The streetscape concept within the Activity Center is to plant street trees at 35 feet on center. However, this spacing conflicted with the graphic concept Which shows 30 feet. (See Exhibit "C-S".) Staff recommends that the language on page, lll-8.15 'be modified to read as follows: "The concept within the activity Center area is to incorporate a format,` regularly spaced street tree planting system utilizing an informally shaped, colorfili street tree palette: The trees are to be planted 3;) feet on center and are to be placed between 2 to 5' feet inside the property line. , D. Glarifvina the Intent of Specialty Retail Definition (Section 9.1.2J. A review.of the land uses in the Specialty Commercial. Distr.,ict indicate that Office and Administrative uses are permitted along wi,,i other, retail and service uses. Since he's definition`of Specialty Retail, as shown'in D, 9th k� PLANNING COMMISSION ST;APF',REPORT• FOOTHILL RLVD. SPECIFIG PLAN AMENDMENT .90-OI March 14., 1990 Page 3 f�. f4escribes the characteristic of a Specialty, etaiI business, a developer could,' conceivably propose an office. compl ex, ,With ,, minimal floor area devoted'to, retail.''and still' be consistent • with the defini`tibm. Further, such'..a' development proposal would not„he.subject to the Conditional Use Permit process as the Office. and' Administrative uses are permitted in'-the district. To ; avoid this scenario from happening, ,staff " recammends changes to the definition -to clarify the intent sf the purpose of this- district by adding criteria a.s follo►as: "Office and administrative use is :ancillar to th specialty,retail ,Ekes and should not,exceed 50% of the gross floor area ,3n.any ,integrated Specia;,lty"Commercial Center or a master planne&.,Aevelopment. -Through,:the Conditional Use_Permit process,- the percentage of,gross floor area for office and`admini`5trative use, may exceed 50% subject,to Commission's findiiicrs that the deuelopment- r-ets the intent of Specialty Reta�;'; is.a benefit to the "mmun,ity, and furthers the, goals o.f, the Poo}hil-1 Boulev,:wd Specific Plan. The proposed language addition would;.clarify tii intent o 1..f a Specialty` Commercial ce^ter and at :.' same time allow'.for flexibility in the max of'land uses: Through the Cor''ditional Use Permit process., the Commission woull have an opportunity to', ensure. that 04 intent of the Specialty Commercial;center would to kept intact. . E. Addition of FWar®ac 'Store to'S eciait ,Carsercial District Subareas 1 2. and 3 As mention,?d previously, this proposed change vas .a result of a, Use Determination considered: by the Planning? Commission op December ,13, 1989. ""Based on reviewing the unique mix of retai l uses of Gemmel°s Pharmacy, the,,Coo�aissiop le on that such business would bean'appropriate use imU _Specialty Cormercial. District subject to a :Gonditlon�l i1te, Kermit. Copies of the December 13,�1989 Staff Reportcand Minutes Vi'ave` been included for your reference. Normall �, ;the category of Drug Stores and Pharmacies ls geared towards' majhr, national chain stores such as; Osco Drug,. Thrifty St;,re, ,Payleir. and SavOn. The, characteristics ".of these types` of stares are their large siie`and generally a discount store selling ;a wide"selection of:overm-the-counter. brand names and generic name drugs, `a. small pharmacy dnd related ,discount. retai items .such as auto, and garde supplies, household . items, cosmetics, candies¢ ' etc:d PLANNINGCOMMISS10N STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL 8L.'D. SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-01 March 14, 1990 Page 4 - Therefor , I*)is:catego'ry of Drug Stores and'Pharmaces was not includeL as-a Permitted Use iir Conditionally Permitted Use in the Specialty . Commercial District,[ as "it would not, be compatible to the specialt re±si.l -,set' .s. ''As stated in the Gemmel . previous staff report,, Is Ph3rm_acy has a unique. mix of retailL uses such as rental i, and I l.es of large medca'1. equipment and emphasis ,on gifts and 'a,zoda' fountain; These uses are more specialty;retail than a normal] pharmacy store, However a store would rot be able o es"ab,lish ;its business in a Specialty Commercial District`, as ttfe ca. gory of Drug Stores and-Pharmacies' is not listed as permitted in this district. To H"Kv�ae ivi� r�ati;bility'for this type of pharmacy -store, staff Yrecommends°that the category. of -Drug Stores and Pharmacies,.bE: separated into two 'suil-categortG3 follows: " r o Discount drug stores and pharmacies o+er 1(wy000 square, fecal:', '.' ''. '. o Pharmacies with or with related speciaTty retail under• 20,000 square feet. The purpose of the two snb-categories is, to .keep the la`tye major chain drjog stores within 'the 'Comnu►iity Commercial District whil%3 the smaller .sized pharmacies With a '.unique mix of specialty retain use could establish their 'businesset,: in the SpecAlty Con,-!?rcial District through. the Conditional Use Permit.t, F. Deletio'j, . Nord :Avenue Setback Standards frass,Sutiarea 1 Section 'tip. '• Since Subarea 1 does not include Vineyard Avenue, it would be appropriate to d7ete the setback standards ,from the table>'in the activity center to eliminate any confusion. (See Exhibit,ir A. Changes to Subarea 2: 1. Clarification of the developlient disteint . for the-. 'property located at the•end'of San Bernardinn 911ad. As shown in Exhibit G-1,,-the- property. located at the end_of San Bernardino"iititad and at the north .sjde does not show ,any :T designated develop m=nt`. d`istrict ,Since thearea east pf, thu site is designated as MP ; (Medium Residertiall, staff l recoMmOds'that the development'distriot, for this. area should ��.. ti aiso. be MR �,7' J/� r PLANNING COMMISSION STPFF REPORT�� FOOTHILL BLYD. SPE4IFIC, PLAN HM€NDMENT 90-01 ' March 14,, 1990_ . t Page 5 2 "itlon of ptrmatted.d a .conditiona3ly permitted_uses ��, d deve OPmeC r.,standards 'for HR Distkct in subarea 2 (Section 9:5:2), r The proposed amendment is to,add perms-Eted and conditionally pe�mtt ed'.uses, as, wet;1 'as the de ,elopmeht standards fo'w'MR Devf > 'ent. District' in .the <Subarea C as 'hey'are missing. T � '_and the standards=are �iinilar to she-MR,:DQve°.©pmSI Dis�1 ict`,ti: Subarea_13;- IV, EMVIRtl;VMENTAL ASSESSMENT The proposed amendment wound n ot cause any- significant impacts_7 tQ U6, environment, in'$hat the proposed; changes 'Further cia,ri y,.'Vle exi'�sting goa74� and,ob3ecfives of the, approved FootMl! .Soulevard QSpcsific.Ptsq that;were a q#sidere i _in: the Fna`I EIR for fife Foo`thili•BauTevard,'Specifc Ptan-when`It.was. . certified by the.,City Council: on September 16.E 1987, RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends` tl11,L- Planning'`Canmiss7on."review the proposed'changEs to the Foot 31 Boulevard Spec1f,` P.1an.-< if , ahe Commissidn.concurs With the proposed amendment, then adopt the attached Resolution recoir�nendin '. approval' of ,. thet - proposed amendment te,Cisty o' th Couno;il. Res p ly su ted Bra er' City p nner BB:NF/ifs A*tachments: becea�ber°13 1989 Planning Ccmmission .Staff'Report and Minutes Exhibit "A" - Add Klusman House. Exhirbit "9 - Real igned-:Red•Hi'l l Road ' Exhibit "C-1" - Me"dian Island Exhibit "C-2" -,Med,ia6 Island Exhibit "C-3" - Spacing'of Trees Within Aet,�rity Center Exhibit "D" - Add Crfite 1a to Spec.ialty.Retali1 Exhibit "E" Add Pharmacy Stor�esto'�Special.ty Commerc'.{1 ,District Exhibit "F" De_1ete.Vineya'rd Avent,p Setback Standards Exhibit "G-1" Develop' hit District `r. prop;rrty at end of'San Bernardino Road 4 Exhibit, "G-2" r Add Use�_.and Standards of MR to' Suba - 2 Resolution of Approval „ x � 7 i CITY OF RANCHO CTJCAMOMGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 13,:1989 TO: Chairman,and %tubers of the Planning Commission FR(fiI: Brad gul ler, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong; Senior Planner SUBJECT: WNSIDE ITICN OF AD)ING' DRUGSTORES AND RiARMAr;IES AS,A COMMUNPU .PERMITTED USE 1N INE !SFEE; A Y tNR , D C R _(T) N YLL'BOULEVARO SPECIFIC— N. Y. ABSTRACT:. -Tile . 0,opa e' of . this report -is for. the Planning mnission to revi-_W and discuss the proposal .as Ifrtntioned . abtive. If Co .niarion concurs with -the findings in thm report, then staff' sho,i'd be directed to. initiate and,prepare an amendruc t to the Footr;ill ,Boulevard Spec ific'Pi an. I I. AA' A.�jBack ioundc The developer of- Thomas Winery Plaza located at t e northeast'corner of Foothill and Vineya►1, Avenue, recently informied.staff of a potential. tenant,' Cassel Pharmacy, who is interested An locating within the Building, C, which is urvier j construction. ,' (See Exhibit`A.j However; a review. of the Spc�iatty Carmmercial District in Suberea:2 or' the Foothill Bculevard specific Plan sizs tflat -drugstoms and pharmacies aT� neither permitted or nnditonally" permitted: ..' The ' developer believes that- Gemmel Pharmacy with their mixture, of retail goods rind services Iwould meet. "tire intenit of'Y-the li Specialty Con rcidl District. Attached for the t4W1s5ign.'s Review is a letter from Gemmel Pharmacy explaining in d?iail their b�+siness operation ind,.zpecial, -zharacteristics. B. Intent of'the;S ecial l Cam'Mrcial District* Azdardicg.. to.. he, qot ou eva pec is an, , Pee ally Corrnercial is intended +.o accommodate .specialty uses, warich 'proirofie a landmark quality or create a�.special air�ience,which is upique is a particular area.`. For example, specialty uses such as. farmers' markets, cafes, bakeries, gift' shops, and ,other, specialty theme oriiented uses lend support to:,:, the establishment of a them`-oriented activity centar There are' only three (3) areas designated for ,Specialty Coimnercial :'in the Foothill Boulevard .S,pecific Plan-' namely,;,I) the Thomas Winery Plaza at tra, northeast corner of Foothill and liineyiard,. 2) at the western end of the City, and •3J at the 3rtersection - " i PLANNING COMMISStd STAFF REPOttT SPECIAM COPIIERCL pS '-'GENp7EL fli RMACY i Qecember 113 1989,. rfi �r of Archfiaaltl Avenue:, Attached" for vair reference" is ,the s.tmmary, table of permitted .and cpndikianal'1y permitted uses fir Specialty Commercial District. C , Uri'queness of ' the Proposed Use .(Gemmel .Pharmacy �mma1 rt�cy.atares.ra 'e ri size, rom ;0 square feet to 9;000 ar square feet. The pro dict/service sold im udes,`a pharmacy department,. sales and rental of `radical equiprnt axt supplies,: candy, gifts and a :soda 'fout+tain.; A congrarisan•of' ' the mix,of uses-_c learly shown that it is different, from'other. I^ ma Jim r chain drug stomas, such ac t ,rift � y, Sav'On; etc.. frat x' setaAeffrO Pharmacy apart fromm,the other national'chain.drug ' stores is their'ssmal l size and. emphasis, an'gifbs,°.as all a`s the old fiskrfdhed�i,soda founatain.,- In fact, a look `at :'the retain uses as .desCr3bed, above show, that they wand be r considered Speci.ait� .Reta0;4nd,would 'be permitted under.;the Specialty. 'Commertial-,Distr,ict; except for tiie phav'mscy portion of the;,business'. III. REC�tEMOATIQN: Based on. the above analysis.. staff feel,that(;;the a, io such land uses; totheSpecialty Comrrereia7,.Gistr let . warrants. consideration If the Commission concurS;";-then staff , shauld'be4directed to inAt'iate an:amerldrrent to the Specific Plan: Re, fu Fly.subm d, Brad Bui ler City'Planner 884 NF:sp V' Attachments L »ce'r from Gemnei Phavfrsacy GroupInC. Summary Table of.Land Uses°in Foothill-'Specii is P1ar Exhibit "A"^P Site Plan;; " t�l } { if ;{ :. GEMMEL PHAPM CV ,G�®IJR, INC 143 NORTH EUCL10 AVENUE • ONTARu7. CALIFORNIl\ o A/C ? 4 9e'4�7132 GI7AgIQ.G+wd Mrp i as�rsys NTCLA10.UPINv'q ALTA COMA No.7Cd'9LMt crM F6LLS-row CAMON"Mmai LOMA 'p,n ' A�,Df'tNIA131781, :in,feF.;;l Hot10mbsr.27, 198 "rti.NG Oitr�> Mr. Brad Buller, City ,Planner. raty,;of Ranc.Lo Cucamonga A ' 3320 Baseline Road P'L 0. LBOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga,. California 91729" RE: 'Thomas Winery 'Plaza, bear Mr. Buller: „. As requested by,Nand .Fong,_off your staff,, included are some of the unique gestures, of Gemm61 _Pharmacy and our related busine=.sa Gemmel Pharm?cy ;is a _twelve store, 'family operated aril c'ara,ed drug store: chain. With our .headquax°tazs :aocate3 n..�. Ontario, and nine of our, stores,situateii 'in'S an' 'Bernardno County, �e,ara committed to the Inland Empire marketplace ; The t icai Gemmel., Pha 1'p rmscy L is L six ,'thousa+�d to, nine thousand square feet in size. Gemmed �s,' is a; 01small tAwn° r!. Pharmacy providing excell6rit, '.Personalized service to its' customers. L Besides i::he pharmacy .department ''Gemmel"s provides extended service: ;to local hospitals. "In the Rancho cucamonga,area we provide' home;medical equipment and supplies to patients discharged":@rom 'San.Antonio Community Hospital. this equipment includes wheelchairs', beds. and walking aid''., as well as ,,,Oxygen and respiratory items. adc3it3or_ally, we' provide extensive,supppl es avid s@dices tc ostomy patients and pediatric. Gemmel's Ai, known 'throughout San Bernardino. Count having on y fo, . e r ef the largast candy departments of any store in the County- We specialize. in imported ,candy, arid. sell locally nade candies such as; Russell Stover. Way $re also going to' rack 'specialized open candy which will b® sold by the pound, Our cosmetic departments are licensed ,to sell designer line f ` cosmetics such as Whits Shoulders, , Shalimar, 'Chanel. and- Nina Ricdi. Such high-end cosmetics are usually sold 'in department' stores'. la We have a very ex.ansive gift department selling. auch high 1 r _ - i�r. Brad Buller _ November 27,, page 2 quality giEt;a ao crystal, "glass and porcelain.items' as wall as jewelry' "and„personal toiletries. We also-hava ,a laxge card c'lisplay, 3pro ng."a variety oP name brand cards: Additionally, we are going to "operate..-an ""'old"'fashioneel" soda fountain ,In'_the-`new TFromas Winery_Plaza;:st�ira�." his soda fountain' is to be pstt®rncd aftar trsaiitions►3 ,drug store fountains, in dsisign ',. selling a vaja3ety of ald fashioned drinks;and ice oreams'.- Vnlike our lArgot cbmpezi tors,,' Gemmel. Phaz�✓�acy "hoes nct. sell ` automotive supplies, .. h"om® apgliancec, al'othing,..= gardening "'supplies, . camptng gear, table aid lYatd —are , paint," furniture,' sporting gooda; or pet supple as We also s do..not sell 1 cluor,,,wines"ot:beer.., Our operating hours,.ar Pram 9:00 a m. 4to 8:00 p.at The typib l Gb=-41's .etorb employs" aia�and tan people Please do "note hesitate to contact m it your nerd any, further informot an.,.. ? Sincerel Y _' ez Bares n r' Recut i v ca Priasan GemmeY Pharmacy Group; Inc. <� Bv:j o - Y" I. !r ry k - t_t S13MP1AF2Y SiL13LE OF`PERMITTMD CX) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED l0) USES SubarR"I Commercial Us - 6 t�ReP CC 0'*8 X C CO LM MR Sub T ea r U M CC RRC MR Subarea LI es Antique Shops X X r Appar i' a) eovt aeo_ x x x x x x x x x b) Sawal X x x x X x X x Appliance Storev m+Repair I x X X Art,rusit,and Photographic Studios and Sq,Xly Stores X x x r X X x x I 10 Auto Service Station 0 O 0 0. 0 0 0 0 ` Auto Service lincluding ootorzycles, boats, trailers, c ): a) Sales(niti:ancillary rcWr facilities) 0 0 0 0 b) Rentals Q 0 0 0 a e) Minor Repair (does not include major egine uark, muffler shops,painting,body work, upholstery,etc.) a 0 0' 0 0 d) Coin,-up washing 0 0 e) Automatic HAOIng 0 0 f) Parts and Supplies X X x / x X Bakeries (retail wlyl x rx x x X Y I X X x Barber awl 5eauty maps x x x x x x : x Y x x x+ Bed t Breakfast 0 0 0 a a 0 a 0 Bicycle Shops X x X X X Y X it .. Blueprint and Photocopy Services' Y X X x' Y X x X Book,Gift,and Stationary Stares (other than adult related material) X I X x x X x x :x x.. x x Candy and Confectionaries X x X X t a x x x x+ Catering Establishments I x x x x x Oina and Slassaare Store, X X X x' X x x it Christws Tres Sales Lott, (operating an a terparary basis) X x x X Churches 0 a a a 0 0 0 a a`0 a -0 0 Cleaning and Pressirq'Establishments X I x x x 1'x X x X Cocktail'Los1Ce(bar, lounge tavwn) Including related enterWnerst 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 Commercial Rawmailwl a) Indoor uses s=h as Wing and billiards 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 b) Outdoor uses much as tennis and basksttiall 0 a a 0 0' 0 0 0 Convalescent Facilities aid Hcipitais 0 0 a : 0 a 0 a s 0 0 0 Curtain ad DrWy,Ssops X Y x x X X x Gay Car.Centers 0 a 0 a 0 'a 0`o 0 0 0 a Balicatessm and Sptc(aity Fead Stores . X:Y x x X 1 x X x D Drug Starts and Pharewlee x x x X X x Farwrs 1(arkets X x x x x Flow Causing Shops x Y E Y x ` C1 a v SUHMARY TABLE CIF PE1- :YVED(Xsa AND 'C[NDIT113K -I_Y QER'kXTTED (05 USES Subarea are Subarea Two Subarea Three Su urea Fowr Retail Cusercial Uses SC CC a R P SC M G MR SC CC Ca LM M U M M RE 16R Li Florist Shops x I x x X X f x X x x x x Furniture Stores X x X x x X X x Hrd>ars fares Health aid AthAatic am and weight Reducing Clinics X a X 0 X a 4 X xa Eby Soaps X 16 Ice Crean Stomas and Soda Fountains x 'l % P x X x x I it' Janitorial Services and Supplies $ %' X X It, Jeeiry Store Laoaodry (self service) x " x a z y Leather Good,;and Luggage Stores 1.100 Stores t) a D a n a 0 ressangor and Dire Services rwc, Dance,and forth'.Arts Studs it X ter iVer and lltgaains Stores I x X y c X,x x 'X x x X x+ tk rwr es&Barden.%*Ply Stores .)b %Whin mcloseli area x x X X x' Office,Business kchine and Canputer i Cospowt.Stores X x x,X X X x X % Paint,Glass, ad wallpaper Stores X X I X X Pet Soaps % I X x t ;I X $a Photocopy % x x X X x X Is Record mO Taps Stores x x x x X :X X I I Restaurants isit'deua►ls ^ a) With antertairoasnt aWr swvinq of alcoholic tiavar a 0 a a 0 (1 a a a s b) 'Incidential serving of,tom+ and wine Without a r c1dail Inunge,bar,,entertainawt, or dancingg) X I a x I a x x a a $ x c) Cafe )tested to 20 stets iincluding outdoor seating) I I I X I X x R X a x X d) Fast Foodi with drive-thou 0 a a a a _ Without driven-bare a 0 a s a s a 0 Shoe 5tares,'Sale wA lair X $ specialty Retail -t1 o a a - a s a .. Sporting BOWS Sto r"I a) Specie��iI���irooatttafo- b) !:^e inq fishing,etc. x' x I x X X X X $ xinq l encnepassing a variety of sports egoipamt Suptarnrkats X $ X I t Skaoing Pool Supplies Tailor Saps X X X X X x X x Television,Radio,VCR,Stag and CO Carwrtot Sales $ X $ 0 �f p SUMMARY TABLE OF, PERM I TTEID (X D AND COND Y T IGNAL 1_Y k, RP1 Y TtED (0) USE^a v — 'Subarea One Subarea TWO Subarea Trree Subarea Few Ratail Ccwcial Uses SC'CC O)R P SC a:0)4R SC CC CO UIR)R U M CC MM tR Ll Toy Stares x X X x x X x x Variety Dvwtn :t Stars,3unia Dapartmt stores 0 X 0 x 6 X X x VetEMnay (doeestic)s'.a)Non-beading X 0 X a X x X x . b) Boarding 0 O 0 O 0 0 Match and Clock Repair Stores x X x x 11 x X X x P Yardage Goods stares X x Subarea Ose Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four Fntrtaineart and,Cultural Uses- SC CC a MR P SC M 0 M SC CC CO L1Rt)il U nu CC FRC)R LI racadss C ^•..„ 0 0 O D 0 0 Culttral/Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor gallery and art Was x 0 +' X X 0 X X 6P Outdoor art exhibits X O x 0 x 0 0 Discotheques a 0 0 0 O a o 0 Theaters: a' a) Dinner theatre 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 b) ( vie theater 0 0 0 0 0 Subarea O+e`,,(Subarea Two Sham Three, Subarea Four =Office and A)®inistrative Uses,- SC_CC 0 in l= SC M 0 M SC CC Co LIRt mR U m CC RRC tIR LI Adadnistrative, Business,and F}ofessiafal Officm x x X X X x X x �X ' X It Banks,Finance Services&Institutions -mithvA drive-thru z X X z X x z X;'x o x Y -mith drive-thru Bupintss and,Office Services X X x x x x X x Interior Decorating Fires X x x x x x• x R X X 7hdicalMental Offices and Relatid Aaalth'Clinics x x X x. X X X' 0 x Is ;titian and Optomotricai a'lops x. z z x x a X 0 x Xa Raaltors and Real Estate Offices x x x x x x' X x x X X is Travel Agencies X x x x x x x x X X X it Subarea One Subarea two urea Three Subarea Four Residential Uses- EC,CC 0)R P SC CC a fM 5c:s CO LHtd MR U tl) CC M)R U Single Family Detached X X x x Single Family Attached (dupla, triples, fourpla) X Y X X x x' ;;Iti-f.dly 1h dings X' Y x x X' Ancillary Residontiai Users a) R -cre facilities (h or less) X X X X x x b) On-site private rareatias r facilities : X x X X X X Atcessery,Uses: ai Aceessr Y Py structures x x x` z z h) Hm.okcupation x x xx x x SUMP�AFtY TAZ7t-E O}r ism ' T'fETa d?ID*ikm ccngDYT$On L-Y poI'IIr _mD CO! uses' war"We Mama Tic I abarca.11 rer Swum Fori Pdslic uses- "TZ a MR.P SC M 0 i4fit SGCC ca UR IR Fl m CC RW Transit Facilities Public Utility Urstallattatt X 4 Stsbmrea&M Subarea iro Subarea TMw Marea Four f -r -Fkatal fJsas- =CC 41B2.P Sc CC 0"a Sc CC CFI UR MR 0 MU. M iQf ,M ii HoteUMatel Q X otel Facilities (War) X Andliary'Uses Ufa ci Cat eri 5srvicea ) dl Ccxktai taiafge Q ei ConfornxelCtsevention Fuilitiss l Q fl Florist Shops gg! ,Cif Shops" - X iI Iff W Iffigaaine Stores X JF :Restaurants Fsit down? 7 E' ki Tawrist Info:•eatiaq X 1) Travel Ae� _ �t: . X Siwbarsa a-it Sbarel Tao Sw3warea Three Srbarea FC== Industrial um-.: W CC Fl MFt P .SC,CC Oft SC M W LMR:m v m fC Rm to LI AFI Industrial wsses dsvel `t tend ds stud .he,as orav{dsd in Sub-am 7 af'the I al Arab Spaeific Plat Mph i Refer to FM note(*) Saetiad'4.9.2 ;r •t { �C3 i � 6f3Lt6+�C3f•_��1J •'�.�uliaca:f� � �iA� �9r�at�-������c�' • ..•.e.r..�c.�+.n++:nr..iy "`' DWI w rest. :�� k%ate" it-vv vvv.rvvv+s 71 ~•�� � �`. -. XK a rasa. s► ' e' < !'+�') i Oltiwr. ..'u..+x a✓..> Y. nar y�y 3'f aR i.irrV� 'V► ?•.r jf'^i��-Y�l . u AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL TOLSTOY, WEINBERGC1 AIESs ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: C 1 SIOHERS: HONE -carried; A DIRECTOR`S REPORTS M. THE PROPOSAL TO E ABLISH DESIGN POLICIES `REOUL4ING' ADDITIONAL A n !nue c•, rom ove — 29, I.W1.1 Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; presenteli the staff report. Chairman McNiel invited puil.ic comment, t there.was none. Commissioner- Blakesley stated the modif ations, .made to .the Resolution appeared to address points raised in the dis. scion at the November.29, 1989 meeting. n. Motion: Moved by Tolstay,, seconded by Blakesle to adopt the Resolution apprJving Design Polices requiring additional arc tectu; l treatment and alternative texture'building laaterials for industria buildings, within the Industrial Specific Plan Area. Motion ca;rrie6 by the fo, ing vote:' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIM, TO! Y, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIdNERS: NONE carried' Motion; Moveo- Toistoy, seconded byt Chitiea, unanimously carried, to continue the meeting beyond 11,00 P.M. N. CONSIDERATION OF ADDING .DRUG STORES AND 'PHARMACIES I►i THE SPECIALTY Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report, Commissioner Tolstoy felt the proposal. from Gemmel Pharmatr:was appropriate for the specialty commercial category. He hoped there was some way to draft language which wrjuld allow that type of an operation while excluding larger drug stores. Planning Commission Minutes -17- December r�; Ing z FPS Commissioner Chitiea felt Gemmel Pharmacy would erfeance the lboma.s Winery ' center b . y providing a iiifi:erent aspect, Commissioner Blakesley felt size limits might be used to preclude drug stores which were not specialty commercial. Commissioner Chitiea felt it would be good to approach utl'lizing the wi,l"ry theme. She felt what specialty includes and doesn t include should be srklled out. Brad 'Buller, Citj Planner, felt confident staff could come up with appiropriate language and,supported the idea that the use be conditional. It was the unanimous consensus of the"-Planning Commission to directstaff to study and prepare an amendment to the Foothill Boulevard Spklfic, Pla+r to allow: some types of drug stores and pharmacies in the Specialty Ccmmmercial District. c: 11:15 P.M. Planning Commission Recessed 11:25 P.M. =-Planning Commission Reconvened K. P&IMINAO REVIEW OF RANCM'CUCAMONGA SPORTS COIAPP EX . Joe Schultz,,Conmunity Services Amager, introduced Michael Schafer, Grillas, Pirc, Rosier, Ives, 4940 ,Irvine Boulevard, Irvine; .Fob Mu Ling, RJM Design Group, 27285 Utjzanblasi; Mission Viejo; Dan ,Guerra, Derbish, fuerea & Associates; and pr4",ssional sports agent; ,#ichael'l4tkins, .8331 Utica, Rancho Cucamonga. He statadt,Ahe Park and Recreation Commission had requested that compact parking spaces'vmmprise, 35 percent of the project and that off,,site parking be shared with 'L` urround;ng industrial area. Mr Mueting discussed the sit plam and traffic circulation. He stated:the bailffelds were being ciusteredmr tournament play with a,ccntroi area at'the stadium Which afforded visibility bt ai1 the fields. He Stated the stadium would .seat 3,500 people. He showed tssmall park area along. Rochester by the main entrance., He discussed the anima helter and additio�al ,parking along Arrow. Commissioner Chitiea asked if there would bleacher seating for the ballfieids, Mr. Aluetirtg responded there would,' be terraced leacher seating for approximately 200"people at each ballfield, with slopes rounding each field to allow for 'additional informal seatin94 Mr. Schafer, project architect, discussed the stadium archi`tec and access. Planning Commission Minutes -18� December 13, 1989 10344 Foothill 9494 Foothill Th►' residence• is a two-story,structure . This.Catifcrnia bungalim is characterize with craftsman overtones cl�r seriaed by by exp—ed rafters,in the eaves, a�.mutti-;4 , the:gable roof, large wont poPch, vrood' gable'ti aOf, corner porch, multi-Light sliding, exposed:eaves and rafters, ar:d windows and horizontal wood siding. multi-light windows. 5.4.16 5.A149othi1l Bungalows 127377 Foothill - These'bungalows located at 9612, s634, This residence 6'.e California bungalow 9, and 9618 Foothilt 6ouieverd. are re- characterized by Glover-pitched gable roof, presentative of the,Califcrnla Bungalow large front porch, wood.siding,,multl-ilght stile with eraftsm66 mvertonea: ,'l'hese } windows, and an arbor/portico leading to structures ere:characterized',bp farce 4he detached garage. zoVerid, porches, law-pftch6d gable roofs, exposed eaves°-aryd ra`�2ers,'r�sritl-light, tivindows and wood. Section 5:.4.17 Klusman ,House (southwest corner of Foothill is Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, _8847 .Foothill :Boulevard);j. 'This .residence is a two-story structure and:af Spanish Colonial ` _- Revival style. It is characterized by�low-pi;tch hipped roof with red the in an irregular patterns,polygonal tower., narrow ' long windows, 'IS" shaped,molding, and;.multi,-pane windows. ':' 1 E'7 4t COMMUNITY{OESICPi.'COtdCERT -5. 4 O U, n u -01 fat jw• i + .-l40Z Ira �# 17 ¢ ## t } t � pC v k � �£ r Access Con9roi`Proctr�¢i lied`Hill {6aiigzement Business contigurus1o�' AN!( Boulevard : Currently','Red bill intersects Foot l €Il currently;reatiz ;no s restrict€ons:. Boulevand at an awkevard angle._ Die'1011 In addition; existing=7r_, mentet parcel this existing configurAian, .Reel l€li will configurations',pramote"a multiple of,con- be realigned in„order A promote:an;, flicting access points which disrupt trdf- •efficient'and safe.transition'to E®e+thiil i `fic-flow by causing increased,s€de Eric::-. Boulevard, tion. A recomuevnded pro ;am of accoss controls, consistent with currant city access policies regulating ,accee5 point, driveway cuts, and their locat€on from won another; including the provisibn of on ws page.,. reciprocal access,agr.eements�j and special. vehicular access cc.�atrois, (sJc6 as right= • in, and right-out islands) is necessary due =` to the following: o Increased vehicu�ar'traffic.capaetty, o ` Increased nerceptFon of safety;' o Reduced,vehicular traffic:conflict` ointsl and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 6 I �t .Q T CiltULAT.BQiV.CONCEPT' " 8.3- STEZ SIGid ti.3. Center Median Island A 14 foot center median shad be;provided within Foothill Boulevard ides ned to t provide access control and,a gosnifyfng landscape statement. The,median will JrF, f71J.2E .ACC_NT /O.ZAA l/Arrs- �c,eate' nrs%2T7,E5�.�4T7/lE��G?I�N NOSE AZV6 4M941;�PL41VTF-,� ;Ce%/TFjr LotcJ EY�'sZ!s shF„'E./II Cs.COGWO L'OYe��o„TAE {_' c AAI.O bRDUNO COY�rQ �i'M'+'�•Y//' .M' / vyj"7'7'� .. /y1�7v0,�'ELER6tEFJv,7� r meilvc >t _ 'CoBg}G ff � ��7A�L v . 7� p t ,G rt r L t, A"^lh���"fifG+3T t rF'» YFICAt.MID BLOCK lOCA71prJ P-d A D H'N —N�I�SCr3p�� e45 �T"�9siiagty °t Q� N 1j APO CE�RIERAL DESIGN �UIOE�t"NE, ,� l!ND DEV.ELt.IPhtE�T.STAt+ft�i4RD,!, f , 7 C �w ��. ��\ : ?� � ��� . ( � §\� . ��- y\�\� . � � ,�' » �? §% � .��3���7 «����« � j � ��x��; : .� �� \ � � {. , .y. ,�a�� .z � � »%�� ���/ a :� � � ��2 � �� _ �:/ � | .�y vz �( w | / . �> � - , «��� I � . fp � f \ ��� \ . \ ^ :/ , � � ��� �� : ����m\ �a .��� ° ._ . ' »« :! { �� ^ . \4 _ &�% . : - , ®� d � � %�\ m\ �y : .�9 � .�} . « .� . .& » © �} ra . ^ >��\ � � ~ �\. »` /� � � K w � y /,v ; > :., � . � \2z . . � »�,»�/ :��� \ <���$ / � � ����! � >�� � a � ~ « �\ e � � k � � ��y . � ,. } � � f \ �.,� \ ( / � .\ . . ?\ * / . \ �� y . �� \ �\ �� J �p 0 �F��e�-x -:ire■�vs'sawtlw�lf � � � S r } yr v .r�w � 't�ytt try 4 r {* 1� r' �� .x♦� 1. (u h 4 1� 1 i-+ '8 . W So ma's 4 y b p `►} z r r t � 8- -�_ c Po f� ncc ' Y a Ef—k M_ � oR ® .� pp g = S'$v1!ULq6- a L" y 1. o ."• aw�•wc � ��p�yi�<'S•� �-03�'. Mod„a o-a/ otV BW°iE99 G'Vn V✓ln:-0O1fl:�� -. s� biDp� HIM g IWOO � tae S ba_.iLEmoil 9 ya b. k g N E9r. i M S- l 5 cc 1911 WIN o d -go gc°oe - s i fjswj �6 =i LU p Q— b Ep 7, 9.1 2 9.1.3 Land Use Definitions Master Plans "Specialty Retail10- This use is typified as The Intent of a master plan Is to provid smallcihops a5T sboutiques which for integrated developmen2 .at the,earliest' specialize in limited product, lines of possible time in the review proceAL unique and novel designs and/or purposes. Through the. master plan, there is an Specialty Retail Is defined as fruilows: opportunity to cool dinate the efforts of single or multiple property owners and o Any retail business not listed discourage piecemeal strip commercial '. separately in Section 9.3.2, 9.5.2, development. 9.7.2, and 9.9.2 which limits its sales to singular product lines of si ose. The p ng purpose, following criteria is intended 40 or of unique and special design (i.e., apply to all projects and should not be cutlery shops, small household or constrained to pv-;el:lines or site personal appilam�dr, kitchenware, 'boundaries. novelty gifts, etc.). Service businesses are not specialty retail o A conceptual master plan may use., required by the City Planner when it le evident that piecemeal development r Limited to a business area of 3,000 will prevent or produce future square feet totally within an development of adjacent properties in, enclosed building. a manner not consistent with the intent of this Specific 'Pian. "Re taurants with Entertainment and/or, ery o co c er es s o A conceptual 'master plan shall be use is typified as a full se dining submitted for the Planning Commis facility with major portions of the floor sion approval,,,together with any area and business operations Ding development proposals and shall devoted to the on-site preparation and address all other parcels as they consumption of food. Entertainment relate to the master plan. activities should be limited to ancillary support function which, shall form a minor o A conceptual master plait shall p3rt of the floor area and business ccntain, as a minimum, the require- operation. The 'sevving of alcoholic ments as set forth in .the City beverages shall be in conjunction with Development Code Section 1720.030. restaurant usage and the avallabli►ty of full listed menu items. The sale and serving of alcoholic beverages snail cease when such menu'items are not available to customers. "Office and administrative use is ancillary to the specialty retail uses and should not exceed 50% of the, gross floor area in any integrated Specialty`Commercial Center or a master planned development. Through the Conditional Use Permit process,' the percentage of gross floor area for office and administrative use, may exceed 50% subject' to Commission's findings that the development ,= meets the intent of Specialty Retail, is a benefit to the community, and furthers the goals of the Foothill DESIGN.'STANDARD Boulevard Specific Plan. AND LAND'USE REGULATIA`.. .a,uinnr�rcT... WlSLC U1- t'trcnlI ItL:...cx) RNU GUNULELUNAL-L.Y PE:Hr7 i:,['ED (0)' BUSES. 'Subarea One Subarea;Two Subarea'ihree Subarea far Retail Comercial Uses- SC CC 0 HI P SC CC 0'M SC CC CO L(R MR U M CC RRC rR LI Antiquz Shops x x X X Amami: ' a) Boutiques x X x x X x x x X b) General X X X x x X x X I Appliance Stores and Repair X x X X x Art, )lusic,and Photographic Studios and Supply,Stores x X X x x x x X X Xe P.uto Service Station °Q 0 0 Oi a 0 O .Q Auto Swdca (including actc:rzyoles, boats,trailers, caaaappers)s a) Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) 0 0 0 0 �` b) Rritals 0 0 0 Q 0 c) (lima Repair(does not inclWe ajar egine work, muffler sis s anti � J oPaP � f � work, upholstery, etc. 0 0 d) Coin-op Wish* 0 U Q el Automatic Washing 0 0 f) Parts and"Suppiins x x I X X Bakeries (retail only) X x x X X X x X x X Barba and Beauty Shops x x x x x-I X 'X' x x X Xa Bed&Breakfast 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Bicycle Shops I x X x x x X Xt I Blueprint and Photocopy Services I X x x x X X x Book,Gift and Stationaryp Stores (other Than adult related,aaterW) X x x X X X X x X x x x Candy and Confectionaries X X X X X X X X X Xa Catering EstaNishments x x x' X x X China and Glassware Store-i x x X x X I X Xe Christmas tree Sales Lots (operating on a tespaary'basis) X X X Ciwrches 0 0 9' 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 a. Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X x x' X I x X X x Cocktail Lounge (bar,louse,tavern) including related entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial`Recreationr a) Indoor uses such as bowling and billards 0 0 0 a !i 0- 0 v b) Outdoor uses such as tennis aid basketball 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Curtain and Drapery Shops e X X X x X X X _ Day 4Can Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oalicatemens and Specialty Food Stores x x X x x x x _x X it OUM,14000 .so. o PwAffo6s',wrr#,tik p p 0 Gd TItGf1r 011TPOW Z6Y.. 9.3.3.3, Setbacks: city.Center Yard Buliditn Parking Street Yard (measur .from.face of`tha ultimate caro)s 5 fist FIr. Znd Fjr-� o Foothill ,C�oulevard , Z5' ` 50' 40* Rear-Property.Lina: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residentlat Development 25� fi5' o .Adjacent to Ezisiftug or Planned Commerclal .Q W' I Fment interior Side Property 'line. " o . Adjacent,to Existing"or Planned Resid?ntlat Cevefaprrtent. 35' ', Is, o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial: Development Sr L Y i �.' SUB-AR E DESIGN STANDAla03' I _ AND'LAND' USE`RE.GULAI'IpN: Lt1 i O D f Ic MO = d tiIc rono Q o lu III 41 A 116 lu cc p V 11 69 iyy M tlf :� W k g O sC i -+ dd W f e .4 � W . 3 , m � �. �r r. ' .15 f LIT"Y 1aA ': 9,5.2 permitted and Ca+nditionat Cfti`eS Retail Colomerctal ;uses - Land Use a SC CC O MHR Antlque Slops X :. Apparel Stores: a), Boutiques X :X b) General X_ . X Appliance Stores and Repair X Art, Music, Photographic Studios, and Supply Stores, X X i Auto Service Station - O O' �► Auto Service (Inck-ding motorcycles, boats, trailers and campers: a) Saias (with wncillary repair.-ftcti[ties) O b) Rentals O r. c) Nltnor Repair (doesz" Include mayor engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work,'upholstery, etc.) O d) Cote-op Washing a) Automatic Waching. f) Pares rand_Su;�vties X ` Bakeries (retail only) X'• X Barber and Beauty Shops x X X �I i �I- i Retail Commercial Uses - Continued Land Use SC CC 0 MHR i Bicycle Shops X X -% Blueprint and Pho,�6 Copy services 9( ,c Bed & Breakfast O O .� Book, Gift, and S(jaticnary Stores X .X X (other than adult related. material) Cardy and Confectioneries, X- X Catering Establishments x Cocktail Lounge,(bar, lourg®, tavern) Including related entertainment 0 O O China and Glassai�re;V'ores X k' r Christmas Tres/Pumpkin 3-aleer lots Operated on a Temporary Basis X . Churches O O . C Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X Commercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bawling,`billiards O O b) Outdoor'uses such as tennis and basketball O O Convalescent Facilities and;Hospltais 0 0 O Curtain and Drapery Strops X' X Day Care Canters O O O Delicatessens and Specialty' Food X X _} Drug _'7res and Pharmacies X Farmers Markets k 'Floor Covering Shops X SUB AtirEA MESfIGN S't;ANUARDi AN!1 LAND, USE UL' ION It RetRIUCou0nakfal Uses-,- Contirwed Land Usaa SC CC O MHR Florist Shopis X X. X `. Furniture Sores t, . Hardware Store's 4 X Health and-Athletic Gyms and 1 Wet6hii Reducing Cltreics . O . k.. X .� Hobby Shoos X X j Ice Cream stores and 'tea Fountains X :X Janitorial Services'and:sup p As � Jewelry StM, X. X L.aunTIry (Self Se.vdCC .X ` Leather Goods and Umve Stores X X { , sluor Stores ®s" -O �! Niesseng�gr",and Wire Services. X X MusIC,, and�maartlal arts sojudios O ; { Newspaper Stores X X -Z: } Plaarsarias arse Garden Supply,5torbe Within,Enclosasd Area X Of+lc Business M2chdne and ;! Computer Component'.Store c X Xr E_ Paint, Glass, and 'Wallpaper, Stares t Pet Slops X X Protocopy (Xerox) X X ;r Record and Tzpgv Stores X:- X --------------- A t a X Retail ZONImOrclal;Utes.-Contlrrued Land,U�Use SC CC O MHR Restaurants (slt doa+n)- a) With entertain hent.a0d/or, the,servingiof alcoholic nlerag%s. O . O b) Incldenta4 serving ,of bees and wine (withbut. a cocktail'Viin a Fir, entertainment, +or dancing) x X O c) Cafe, limited to 20 seats' i ()ncluding outdoor ssatln4) X X X d) Fast Food,(wit1: drita-these) ;7 (Without.dr;ve-t") O O Shoe Stores, sale and.repalr X X _Speck Retail p d Spor'ting Goode Stores a): Spaciaity;„backpac: rag; tennis, skiing,mountaiii-- caring, fishirg,:etce) X X f• b) General; encorrpasralrrg a varlet;,of sports equipment x Suparmarkets• X ' Swimming Prof Services and Sales X Tailor Shops X„ X Television, Radlo, VCR, Stereo and CD Component Sales' X 3y Stores X' Y Variety Department Stores, Junfor Department Stores o X Veterinary (dumstic): a) Pion-boarding X bj Boarding Watch and Clexic Repair Storeq X X c'>, Yardega.Goada Stores X Slil3-rSRBi� DeSIOe1� $'PA3VDACFL3S ®� AOD LAND USE. ItECa9i!L�,Ti 16P1 4f �t \ j r , Bnte dnmmnt and,Wbira li st i, j L and•Usm SC: CC• O MEdR + r J Arcades, Guttural/Artd'st Exhlbts }4 a) Indoor gallory - �• b) Outdvor an eshibita p Dlscothcques p, p _ I haatSrs: , �) Dinner thastre. O O b) Aidv!e (mujV-pjW) O ;'- Jffice and dnis"tdmgt use Land Ume SC Ct° °O t�ihR e� AdmInIstrative, Business•, and Professional OfficeX' ?G Banks, finance services Paid InstitutioO (wItilout drive-thru) X X X (With:drive-thru), :O.: ® ab Business and Office Services X x Interior Decorating fIrma X X, X Medical /D�nt�i pffices and Related health Clinics Optician and Opto<stetrrca9 Sips" x X i Realtors and Real Emote Offices X X X Travel Agencies X X X.` r rig± i I R"Idantial:Uses; t� Land Use SC CC D' AN Single Fam11y Detachad Single Family'Attach®d (duplex, - _ ' } `triplex,.-fourplex r Multi-family. Dwellings: X s` 1T Ancillary Resideer_�es a) Homecare feedlt4tes or fesa) X b) tsn-asC4e private receaa. ' �- facttttles yz I 2) Accessairy Uses a o accessary, struittures o home occupation yj I' 9.S.3 Site Deveiapsient Sftn&rdas rea TWO General Provisions; Site 'Devalop ent Sections 9.5.3.E and 9.5.3.3 r relate to laud development Within ft activity dater only.,, Site' " deveiooment standards relating to oar land:use,districts within araa l'wo shall,conform 4o the City of Rencho Cucamonga's �a�nvweiopm*P2 C and the standards listed In Sections 9.5.3.4 and.9.5.3.5. SU6-0EA-DESWN S`PANU RDS t` LAND9"USE;RECULA' lDl� . x� 9.53.4 Site D 'imensions and Neight Limitations aF'kwsy Lard Case Feature MHR D Whimum Deeralopabie Area IA;; Minimum Lot Size tAC Minimum Lot Idth Ylinimum Lot Death Height`Limitations: a) Within 5o' of street yard garb face - 24' 20' b) Within too-feet'of a Re sideaetiai District. :25� e)- Ottw r Likettons 35* sD' d)' Towar''S, campareiias, roWndus.- MU11MUM Site Cov'ersgc {n4,Iot area) �Q Minimum 0&41 a iaNdscaping tlnciudas �r articulated plaits, hairdscapa areas, t Ff arefiffi, cour4yarn`)s, and patios) IS% 0 en Space ,a i 1 �� 'J. F r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTICM OF Pt PLANNING COMMISSION OF:�-THE"CITY OF' � RANCHO CUCAMONiXi ,'CALIFORNIA, 'RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ; ? N FOOTHILL , 60ULEVAM SPECIFIC ',PLAN AMENDMENT;"' SO 01a: REQUESTING' TO AMEND THE?,FOOTHILL,BOULEVARD-'SPECIFIC PLAN; MAO BY�'ADDING ,PHARMACY. USE IN THE SPECIALTjY'•COMMERCIAL DISTRICT :OF SUBAREAS'1,•2- AMD` 3; CLARIFYING THE INTENT',, OF WORDINGS IN:,SEVERAL`AREAS''OF THE;SPECIFIO PLAN T6-(� ; FOR' CONSISTENCY-'PURPOSE�,` CLARIFYING . THEDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND..`STANDARDS FOR THE AREA -AT THE: END OF SAN BERNAROINO'° tROAD IN SUBAREA "2; AND MODIFYING THE PLANT. PALETTE' FOR ' THE' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE MEDIAN. ISLAND,, AND.MAKING FINDINGS_IN SUPPOR.T THEi2E0F ^ A. Recitals. (i) On December 13,," 1g89, the Planning Commission directed staff to initiv.te:;Foothill Boulevard Specific. Pl.an Amendment No. 90.O1 as'_descr 'ed ` in the title of this,Resolution. �ereinafter.in this';Resolution, the subject Amendment is-'referred to'as the:applicationtt. (ii) On March-":14 ,1990, the Planning' Commissian: of the City 'of Rancho Cucamonga p nducted, a duly noticed public heariog'on the appl cay,,in (iii) All legal prerequisites to, the adoption`of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,• •THtREFORE, it is hereby round, determined and resolved ay the Planning Commission,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows* 1. This Cortmission hereby "specifical'ly. fInds that .all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part "A " of this Resolution are true and correct.. , 2. Based 'upon substantial evidence. presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on .March , I4 1990,��includ ng , written and oral staff' reports, together, ~`with public ♦testimony, . this Commission .hereby specifically finds as follows: ry (a) 'This amendment does not cohflict with the . Land Use ' Policies of the General Plan, and: (b) This amendment promotes the goal and obJectives of the. Land Use Element;,and the Foothill Boulevard Specificenlan; and ; (c) This amendment would not be materially 'indurtous or detrimental to the adjacent. properties and;would not have.a sagnifi.cant Impact. ; on tha environment nor the surrounding 'properties. . t ,a r: Z w PLANNING,-COX4ISSION'RESOLU7, N0. FOOTHILL BLVD,.-SPEGIFIC;PLAN AMENDMENT 90-Oi Marclt.l4,'1990 Page.2, 3 Based upon the substantial eyidence presented to this. Ci�mmissop during the 'above-referenced, public hearing ,and,upon,the specific fndipgs;of; facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2,above, this' Commission`hereby finds and concludes as-foltoras: raj That the;,-proposed amendment" would :not have sagnr icant impacts on the envr.'onment nor the surrounding properties; and (bj That the proposed amendment".is in :unformance ;with the„ Genoral Plan: y, 4. This.. Commission hereby'.finds -that the' proposed, amendment ;has�� been ;•eviewed and-:cum sidered'in `compliance with the ,California Envronment;l Quality Act, of, 1=970 and, further,- -the Cfi_ty. Council has certified �'an Environmental Impact �Heport on the �Foo"il'l Boulevard .SPecific P.lafi. on Segtemher° 16, 1987.E 5. Based upon .the findings. and.:cdnelusions set, forth in-par 1, 2 3, and 4.above, thisrCommis§ion hereby-resolves that pursuant'co Section 65350 to 65855 of ther California ;fovernment'Code:, that the''Planning Conanission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; heretiy;recomnQnds'approval.'on the ":14th:day of March, 1990, of Fooafiill Boulevard Specific:Plan Amendment'No. 90-Qi`, as shover, on attache&Exhibits A thTough 6. The Secretary to this Comnistiov shal1 certify to the ado►ition of this Resolution.' APPROVED.AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990." [k PLANNING COMMISSIO.N.OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. BY: a Larry T. el.,.Chairman ATTEST: r =! Brad Buller, Secretary,, I, Brad Buller, Secretary oflthe Planning .Commission of the City of Rancho ` Cucamonga, ;do hereby certi:y that the foregoing,.Resolution was duly"and•.,, regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission .of. the City of Rancho.Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of March, 1990, by-the following vote''to-Witr AY(Sc COMMISSIONERS NOES: Cfl�tiM3SSI0NERS ABSEFh!: -COMMISSIONERS`- -� t>_ • CITY OF RANl�HO CLIGA1ViQl�(GA STAFiiiipon fri DATE: March"'1'1; 1990 TO: Chairman and Members` the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller-:;City Pla,'7ner r� , BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: AM AMENDMENT TO. ENTERTAUMENT' PERMIT bRDINANCE'NO. �95ut - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Anyamendment to Chapter 5;12 of the,Muni0 pal Cede;-modifying regulations for entertainment permits. I. ABSTRACT: This is an ailbndmert to clarify the regulations for annual renewal of_entertainment 0ejmits. :;�. II. BACKGROUND: The City Council ad5jpted-Ord nance-No, 2gD, in"November OF 1988. to, ,require permits., - to' operate s-a '64sness with entertainment, ,such as live bands_or performance acts,,,appi,icants must submit ;detailed information concerning the nature of. the , proposed entertainment ana the persons responsible fir management. ,The review' process'for an Entertainment Permit is.very, ; similar to a Conditional J1se Permit: the CoWlssion must hold--a public hearing and may conditionally approve the`permit....Ab6ut.six Entertainment Permits have been reviewed :and approved.' by 'the,' Planning Commission. , i� III. ANALYSIS; Section 5.12.110 vould require.the City to process a new permit each year. This means that the:Plannin ;Commission would have to review and approve every` Enterta Vinment` Permit each,year. Tha intent was to give the.City the ability to review .each permit annually to see if any of the information listedin the'application has changed during the past year that would warrant changes to the approval .or specific conditions of approval. Staff believes that the annual "renewal application can be best.achieved' through. an administrative review process. 1 Staff recommends that new Tanguage be inserted which establishes a staff review,of the annual renewal application to determine 'if 'a modification to the Entertainment Permit is needed. If. sn the" matter would then be referred up to the;Planning Commission Wit''a detailed staff report addressing ,the changes in the application. This process was used recently, on the Polo Grounds'Entertainment Permit. ITEM C" ' PLANNING,Cd�fMISSION STAFF;REPORT: '` a �' �� ri` EP 290 =,CITY OF.RANCHO:CUCAIONGt1 MARCkf 4 1'990 r Page:2 :� �� LQfl 4 f A k4 Ih., RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that; the .Plannt.ng Ca i5ston adopt' the attached ;Resolution recommending to khe= City ;Council approval.of the attached Ordinance,. fRespectfully,submitted; Brad Buller MY Planner BB:NF:m1g Attichmentsr Exhibit "A" Existiqg EntertainmeNt O dinance Resolution.Recommendii;g Approval Proposed Ordinance 1` , t a sc N 12.0 0 i Chapter S.12 REGULATIOi3 OF tNTERTA1I M NT t Sections:' , 5.i2010. Permit`requzred. ' 5:12020 Enter tax ent defined. 5.I2.630 Exclusions.- 5.12.040 Application forr permit. < 5.12.050 Investigation and ,hearing. 5.12.0,60, Notice; of hearing:` 5.U.070 Action, at hearing.: 5,12..080 Denial o. oapplicatLoh. 5.12 096 Cotiditions. imposed on permit.' S.12'.200 Suspension or'revocation of pezznit. . 512 '10 Fees: 5..12120. 2'ime for filing rapglicata,on. 5.1`2.130 Security guard required :at dances. ' 5.12.`140 Chapter to"govern.; 5.12.150 Prohibition and penalties. 5.12.160 Civil remedies available, 5.12.OIO Permit required, No person or bus;iness entity shall operate, conduct, or manage anyplace"or premises open to' tle:public where food or beverages are sold, offered for sale, or given away,.:and where any form of entertainment, as defined hereinl is provided or fur d hed without first obtaining,a _permit soto'do as hereinafter- provided for in this chapter. (Ord. 290. SI(part)', 1486) . 5.12.020 Entertainment 66fined. "Entertainment" means every form of live entertainment, mus ca, solo band.,or or- chestra; act, play, burlesque r show, fashx n siia review, pantomi i scene, song or dance, act or ionq au,s•`dance act,. or any other act or perfonslence participated in by-oneor more persons for the .purpose of holding t16 attention of`, gaining the.attention and interest of d-iverting,'or amus;.Zq _r guests or 'patrons. (Ord. 290 51(part)-, 1986), 5.12,'030 Exclusions. The provisions' of this chapter shall not be deemed to require a permit for the fc$llgwing.: A. For the, use-of ,a radio or other electronicah play- back; device in any establIshment,, except when utilized by an announcer or "disc jockey" who at any -time provides any '£oi^M,., $ " of vocal ehtertainment-,•,including the arnouncing of. song:. 'I titles or artists' names in conjunetian"theiewith; B. For-any entertainment provided,.Zoi memb-rs and' their guests at,a private club where admission is not open to the public; Ranc O ucamonga- 86) '�° i It 5.12.040= �l C. For ente. s,Ainment .ccaducted in connection with o. regularly establizhed motion pictur,, theater, recreation park, circus, or fairground; = A. For entertainment ccnducted'by or sponsored by any bona fide club, society or, association, organized orincor- porated for benevolent, charit&blej� dramatic or literary purposes, having an-establishe& membtrship, ,and which holds meetings at regularintervals of not 'less than once per three ionth period, when proceeds, if any, arising from, such entertainment are used for the purpose of such club, society or association- E. Fo . entertainment provided solely by a piano player or harpist p,:aying music for the amusemQnt o: guests or patrons of an establishment;' F. Fos entertainment'conducted 's4,nZely on. or at,any premises or location which is owned or.operated by, or leased by, to or from the Unitad States, state of Cali- fornia, county of San Bernardino', or-any agency or subdivi- sion thereof. (Ord. 290 91(,part) ,..1986) . 5.12.040 'Application for permit. Applicants for entertainment permits shall file a written, signed and verified ,application.with the city manager,;or his designee, showing; A. The name and permanent address of aP4licantc. ; B. The name, proposed and.current, if any,, business address of the applicant. U the applicant is a'corpora- , ' t-ion, the name shall be exactly as set forth in its articles ofincorporation and the applicant'shall show the name and residence address of each of the officers, directors, ,and each stockholder owning not less than-twenty-five percent of the stock of the corporation. i,E;the .applicant is a part= rership, one application shall show the names and residence addresses of each of the members, including -limited part- ners; C. A detailed description of.the proposed entertain- ment, inc_-tiding: type of entertainment, number of persons ,engaged in the entertainment, and any'furthei_information about to.e entertainment or entertainers, as the city massager. may deem necessary; D. The date, hours and location where the entertain- ment is proposed to be conducted,L and the admission fee, if any, to:be charged; E. The name or names of the person or' persohs respon- sible for the management or supervision or applicant's- business_and of any entertainment; r F. F statement of the nature and character of a:)pli- cant,s business, i;f any, to be carried on-in conjunction with such entertainment,, c-4ding whether or not alcohol " will be served>es ,part of such business; G. Whether or not the applicant or any person or per- sons responsible for the management or supervision of (Rancho Cucamonga_ 90 ;z 11/:96) 5. .050--5 .12.l380 applicant's business 'have;been, within tie previous ten years, convicted of a;crime, the nature of such offense, and the sentence received therefor including conditions of parole or probation, if any; H. Whether or not applicant has' ever had any 'permit ors license issued in conjunction with the sale_6f alcohol or provision of entertainment revoked, including the date thereof and. name of the xeyouing agency; is Sv,ch other reasonf,,ie .infornnation as the.city manager, of designee, may deem necessary. (Ord. 250 51(part) 1986). 5.12.050 ' Investigation and hearing. After the appli- cation for an. entertairiment; permit has been filed,,the city manager shall cause an investigation to be made of such application, and after such inwes ;lgaton has been completed he shall cause the'applica� on to'-be. set for bearing.berore the; planning commission and shall notify the _applicant of the date of such hearing. (Orr,.. 290'51.(part , 198`6),. 5.12.080 Notice of hearing. After the city manager has set-the applicaton i for hearing, he shall cause notice of the hearing to be given to all property owners within' three hundr-!-feet of the proposed or actua.L:`location 'of the applicant's business. For, the purposes of','this section, notice to property owners shall be sufficient if--given to those property'owners who appear as such on the last equal- t ized assessment roll: Additionally, ,the city-manager shall I cause a public'notice: to be posted at' the _!_ation ,vhere the business or entertainment is to be conducted. All notices provided for in this section shall be in the form, and manner as prescribed,by the city manager. ,The applicant shall bear all costs and expenses in' mailing, printing, and. ;posting such notices and shall pay such costs `moo the city prior to the time set for public hearing on the pending application. Failure tv pay such cosEts by the applicant shall be grounds to deny his applicat o '. (Ord.. 290 ,i(part)', 106) . 5.12.-970 fiction at hearing. At the--mime and place set for public hehel-rrng as to any application;' nd a's may,to continued from day, to day,_the p anr7 ng cottinission shall hear and 'determine all the facts and evidence relevant to the applicant and supervisory employees, as well as ;.:he - entertainment proposed, including; the nature an3 'location of the proposed entertainment. (Ord., 290 61.(part) , 1986) . 5.12.080 'Denial of "aeplication. At the aono,ausion'of the 1.,iaring before the plann%ng commi'asion, tt ti`planning commission shall grant, conditionally grant) or' deny the application, which decision shall be final unless appealed in accordance with the provisions; of Section' 17.02',080B of the RNncho Cucameinga Municipal Code. Such dccLsion shall be (Rancho Cucamonga ;; il/,86) 5.12.Q90--5.52,.100 ;+ set forth in a� $solution which shall be adopted within i:hirty days af;, r such decision is rendered. The planning Commission may`Jeny said application if it shall find and determine any of the following: A. The conduct of the establishment or the granting of the woplica*ion would be contrary to the public :hea th, ' safety, morals or welfare;`or B. T$e premises or establishment is likely to be operated in an illegal, improper'.cr disorderly manner,; .or C. The applicant or any other person associated with himas principal,or partner, or in a position or capacity involving partial .or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is-sought,'-to be issued, has been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition or; perfQrm- ance of any obscene show of any kind, of of a felczy or of any crime involving moral turpitude, or has,had, any approv- ' al, permit or license issued in conjunction with'the sale of, alcohol or the provision of entertain,'nent revoked within the: preceding five years oL^ D. That granting the applicatid'a-would creatke_,a public nuisance; or E. That the normal operation of the premises aoula interfere with the';eace and quiet of any surroun(.`Ing res- idential neighborhoaZ: or F. The applicant= has made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement:cf'material fact in the required appli- cation. (Ord. 290 S (partt, 1986). 5.12.090 Conditions on permit. After the i- 'ic hearing as to any application, the planning commis- sic._ in granting any ?permit may also impose such reasonable conditions as to the use or extent of such permit as it deems appropriate. (Ord. 290 Sl(part), 1986) . 5.12.100 Sus ensign or revocatioc: Tcmit,. A. After notice and hearing, the planning .' lane ng , mm coisstcn may sus- pend or revoke any permit granted pursuant to this chapter if said commission finds and determines that any permittea, his agent or employee, or any person connected or associated with the:.permittee as partner, director, offi.cer,'7eneral manager, or ot_;,ar person who is :exere sing managerial au- thority of, or on behalf of, the peraittee or any enter- . tainer acting under the iutharity of such permits 1. Made any fa1.ve, misleading or fraudulent state- ment of a material,fact in' yhe application for permit, or any repo or record °required to be filed pursuant to this s' _ chapter; or 2 Violated any provision of this chapter,� or, of any statute, ordinance, or condition relating to his permit- ted;activity; or (Rancho Cucamonga 90-4 'y 5. 110- 5.12.1,d4 3. Is convicted of a felony, or any crime involving, moral- turpitude; or h. violated any rules, regulations .cr conditions adopted by tha planning commission or city coincil se:,at:ing to the permittee's boldness or permit; or S. Candncted a permitted business in a manger con- trary to the peace, health, safety and general wel,f.nre of the public; or ' b� Demonstrated that helshe is�uafit�'•io be trusted with the privileges granted by such ,a.. permit. 8. The decision of the planning commission shall, be set forth in a resolutiozi which shall oe adopted within.' thirty days of the date of,such decision and shall be final unless appealed in accordance with the provinicrs of Section 1.7.02.0808 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. (Ordi, 290:51(part) « 1985) 5.12.110 Fees. The fee for an entertainment; permit shall be seventy-five dollars, payable annua}ly on, or.before January lst of: each; ant? evefy year. Such permit shall be in addition to any business license fee as 'may ire required by the business 1Zcense lav of the city. However, for the year 1516, the fee for an entertainment permit shall be, the sum of forty, dollars payable upon submission of-an application. (Ord. 290 51 ipart) , im) 5.12.120 .`Time for filing apglication�,, All persons,,who will be. ,,reseM�ly required to file for and obtain an enter- tainmen-c-'permit,`by teason of the provisions of this chapter shall have to aid inclreaI1g November 1 1986:, within which to file their aapplicati,,ns for, art-entertainment permit with the, 'city manager, (Ord. 240 Sl(part) , 1986).• 5.12.130 Secur t ark - fired at Qft zees. All persons conducting a public = anc or ,any entertainment: where dancing by patrons or cr rs .iA peermitted, shall havei'h attendance at the prefn�see fors t�et,purpose of-supervising the dancing and thg'conauct o:4 11 `patzons and rustomerS_, a duly licensed and unifo �;;1,gecurity guard at all times; such xm dancing is permitted'or all.�wed.., However, the provisions of this section shall apply only to those establishments or premises where a dance floor,,or dance area in excess of one huhated fifty square feet .is ava3labl4r, or designated fox dancing by customers or. patrons. (Ord. 290 S1(part) , 1986) . -' 5.12.140 Chapter to cavern. All: prov:LIsions of this title+�hich. are inconsistent cith or contrary to,the pro visions of this chapter are Yeptelcd to the extent such. provisions are inconsistent. with;oa coatrary to the pro- visions of this chapter. (Ord..-290,Sl(part), 1986). 9d- 5 (Rancho 'Cucaman a ., , r 5.12,150 ''Prohibition!and enaltie A. It is unlaw � ful for' any I poi:son, : zmr."'partnersh3.por•corporation`:,to - vio3ate an Novi-sion-or.id. fail to comply with any of: y pi: requirements.-of this.•;chapter .',n2 'parson, :firia, 'p"astner- ship, or corporation violating any.provision de .this Chapter ,,`' or failing to comply tsith aay o£ :tts requirements_,shall.b� jr deeaf!sd' (S4ilty n£ an . nfraction,.and upon .conVi an thereof. r shall be 'putyishx"�lo 3s fol1ows: _. 2. A £_are not e�ccoed�ng;.one hundred, dollars for a tirst Violations 2. Fl fine' not'09'ceedinq.two Hundred:dollars-for a; second violation of =the;,same ordinance within one year; A fas,e.;pct exceerling'.five' hundred dollars fcr each additional Violat#on of .the siiuo ordinance WWiih Vim , year. B., Eacb s.ch person r firm,'partnership, or,cot p-orat-,.an shall be deemed 4vilty of .a separate offense for Bach afd , every day or.any!.,porriohF _t eof'duranq.wh_ch an r`v olaiiah ass any of the provisions' of this;chapter 3's.rcmmittae3> cones tit. .d or permitted•by:,suci'persona fixnc,,pa;^t�aers;tip, or corporation)and-shall.be deemed punishable therefar as provided in thzshapter. c. 5'he provisions of this chapter thr;11 not be can strued as permitting cond�ict not;prescrzbeil harein and.shall i not affect. the enferceabiUty of, aay otherl""'iFpkicable<<`�a o ;t visions of law.; " 5.12.160 CiviL'>emedica-.available, A. 'violation o£-any of the provision9 ,of ;th:.3 chapter shall consti uti a hui s!ance ante'. may,be�abated'by ;the_c,'ity. �Eaz�ugh divii:''.procets by , means of 'restraining,:order,,prelim;aaary or perma'en't.iigjunc- ' ion or in any other mahziei,'provided by law for the abate- ment of such nuisande. (Ord,,290 5w(0art),, Aja&a. 'f (Rancho Gucam�,ngc. 30 '6 �Y } r Sz i' z ,,RESOLUTION NO. ' y A RESOLUTION OF,THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF.°THE' CITY OF RAcZjiu tUCAMONGAr .CALIF'ORNIA' ;:RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN• •AMENOMEMT TO`TITLE 5; CHAPTER 5 12, OF,,'THE RANCHO, CUCAMONGA` MUNVOPAL` =:CODE. 701 WiODIT REGULATIONS' r COI'I(:ERNING=ENTERTAI#tMENT PERRISS. A. Recitals. W On the 14th day oY MarcU 1990, the Planning, Commistion field-a duly 1 noticed publc`hearing pursuant yo Section 65864 of the California Cr3vernment Code• a '. iaf ,(ii) A legal pr?requisites to 'the adoption of this Resolution have eccUrred. S. Resol«cian Y .� NOW, THEREFORE, it" 'is 'hereby found, determined!, and-:tesalved by .the Planning Cbmmission of tge• City of. Rancho`Cucamonga at,'fol,lows I. That pursuant,to section.65650 to•Mb g of the Califs nia .Gtyernment Cade, the P1 nning;Comm ss on hereby reGommeiads:a9proval. or this,A idment.:, 2i The Planning• tbmmission hereby_-,1` and determines;'�that the Amendment �urntified above,'in this Resolute i ixempi ire�r th��requt`r�itt?nts of t6i C,alifoMi-a ;Enviriomental Quality ,°'o;"I970,, as .ameided and the Gu e!,4,,es promulgated thereunder pursuant fo.section'15061 of Divi�fon �'0 Title 14 of the California Code of Regulati.ons.: ' 3. The Ajanning Goisai--sion hereby reco=ends thati the City Council approve this ar�endment to 'the Nunicipal `Code per tiL,attached Ordinance. - APPROVED AND A4OPTF;n;iti:s 14tH DAY OF' MARGN111990 PLANNING CO,`INISS10N ,q THE CiTY-air RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNWIthairman. =%E `:•'TE5 f Brad Eu?Zer, Secretary err, i v ' 'Ft;ANNIN6 COM�tISS�N'RESO4ll1`I011 NO: „?, t �"', s �� �3 r TITLE 5 MARCH,14, 1990 Page, € r 1 I, Brad Buller, 5etr2tary`=ofi the_ Piann$ g Comvnissian`"of t1iej �' f Rilchtl y Cuzamonya9_dd hemb certi fy .that `the"; �regoI Resdlutioir"was. ,duly" and regularly in�trndil,I'd passed, _and adopted Iry,t'he Planning "Go' isian dff,,th City -of Rancha 'Cucamongai-,a a-regttl,ar,meettrq of the;mPla�ning Cor�mtssion�heid � an they bath day of Eircis;�199(1 'by the faitowing vote- o wit: AYES} CQMtiISSI�NES25,= Cl-" Stz"u ABSENT COMMISSIONERS s •f f 1, l I ; J IN t K 5 ' � •jso. 3 ll Y.. �l sl _ �� >= dJ 1 i`_ - C • ; ORDINANCE-NO.� + ? AN OkDINANCE O� THE CITY CCUN,CIL Or- Tw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOrim-,-t LOORNIA, 'AKNDfNG-,TITLE"5, CHAPTER-' 12 OF THE"RANCHO"4;UCAMQNGA MUN%TPAL CODE'tU Mt1DIFY REGULATIONS; CQNCERHING EN:PERTAIIVMENT•pERMIT5, t The-Gity`Gounc�l of he City ofRanrho.�Gucamonga does`5�rdairtas foil ows.. o SECTION 1: 'Section 5.12,.115 is added to Chapter 5 s2 to 'read follows: t 5.12A15 AnnnaT ;Renewal' The appii`cant for eYery, renewal of an, entertainment ,to the Ctt�� Manager, o'� hls.design��e, a, written statement so tang forth such information" concerning the appii alit's ., business during.the peecedivi4 year`as may-be requfired.`by the City Manager to`' ' enable him to ascertao when+er tf�e inP4rmatlon listed.en,their:ariginal entertainment permit`aFpT•ication has,changed in -`tire past ye6r'-,.The C.zty ' Nanager', ur,hi designee, sh811 review 5aid,informatjo: ;jnd determine: f a Modification to the entertainment°permit is warranted 'rhe P"rojmng Gammiss on,.shail review 'any such`mode# eation;pyrsuant_t0.the jrovisians of this 'chapter. SECZ7ION 2:. This-Cpunc1?jf7nds ,that this amendihent is exempted from the requirements of,the 'California,Environmental:Qual`ityAct;of"Y97¢; as �;• imended; and the Gvtdeli,nes promul5ated thereunder pursuant to'Section'35QE1 f of Division-6 of Tit:. lA ofi;tihe•CA!i#arnia Cade,"a# Regulat#ons., 1 • rL 7�t t � x t1 .1. ti 1. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ' STAFF REPORT DATE:, Marc ,C!1990 TQ: Chairman ah&Membens, of the Planning Commission ' FROM: Brad Buller,;City Planner. ; BY: Brett'Hornar, Associate Plann<1r SUBJECT: fOLICY DIRECTIVE- FOR MINIMUM\„LENGTH. OF MEDIAN ISLANDS WITHIN THE CI,Y p� ; I. ABSTRACT: On February 14, 1990, the Comnission;r,drrected staff`to i formulate a policy which would set a minimum di-stance for"lenoth oz median islands within the City. Lit that meeting, staff recommended, and the Commission"concurred,.,with. establishing a " minimum, median length of 280-320 feet, not;including"dny .ta�ar distance. .• II. ANALYSIS: The attached Exhibit "A" depicts the medians currently approved and/or built in Terra Vista. jr,Many of, .these are very., short in length and contain` very little`ef the landscaping .they we're intended to provide. To avoid`having''this situation orcur._in ' the t�ture, a`minimum length for 'nedisns was, suggested.. Staff arrived .at the 980-320 feet minimum median length after. analysis of ex.istir,;� medians' edians and re vier, of the- amount of land§cap.ing potential within a median Iength' of that rs ze. For instance, a 300-foot long ;me ot including taper distance) would allow a maOmum of 15 trees. It i"s likely, .. however, that traffic safety. requirements (sight,_ line specifications) would "reduck this maximum;by anywhere frW 1 tck 6 trees or more depending o-` -:e specific location: ;It is staff s belief that 10 to '15 tt:ees with-in a median ' Ts the minimum acceptable situation. ;If there are any.. .fewer .`trees. :the f'{^ landscaping becomes insignificant. '.._ If the new policy is adopted, mid-block median Openings', in.'terra-'.- .,f Vista would only meet the new standard on three segments a?ong ' Terra Vista Parkway (one opening between Church Street and Spruce . Avenue, ;two. between Spruce Avenue and Milliken;,Avenue, and one`, between Mountain View Drive and Church Street). lnerefa-.�, staff would recomrend that an, e�Ceeption to the ',pal icy (if adooted) be ; made to allow shorter length medians for traffic `safety-purposes,. ,t, and in such -areas where,a, .median break becomes criticalr7 such as at certain local pUblie' street c'rossings; or at locations, ITEM H. .. 0 P,?ANNI"ii0 COMMISSIQN•STAOR EPO T IOLICY F'OR MEDIAN ISLANCS r,arch 14, 1990 'Page 2'; such as the hospital site> in Terra Vista,- which could not_;(ands does not) have left turn access `from e.ithe.r Milliken Aver.;,je or , Foothill Boulevard. ��• III. 'ISSUES. General; As, noted :prev`oysly,`many of`t,a ,ex ts ing .'medians in Terra Vista' are•-yery snort in length�, �,In��fact:'�' mo'st wrouTd=not meet` the,.300 ,feet• minimum aength''if,adopted. .rThereporQ, may become necessary `1 to retrofit many existing ,.:conditions 1 1r "cuiarly along ;Terra 'Vista Parkway); whe 'g the median aength, is less t,ian the minimum. Soecific On Terra Yista ?arkway �ttetween Church :StreEc`fand ri�,iiken Avenue there are eight opef;ngs i7 th.e existing. medianis ands With the existing median apemrigs 'this resui:ts in .on.iy two stretchesi which, comply with the\,nihJmum, 300 foot,yfull-width" median isl-nd policy These stretcYez�"are `locate¢ from !porch Street` northerly to the first .opening approximately 1,I00kfeet, also .'from tirilil;"en ,Avenue' westerly, --ta' the i`irst "opentng,�: _ approximaely_80d.'feet: jo comply 'with the prl�i4y''for .me8:ian � islands, existing openings .vauld have. to be. cl'rtsed The openi!pgs that would have to, be closed .are a5 #o11zws: i .: The first:opening West`0, 'Spruce Avenue w}iic� 'serves the Ora�tigewood-SFR and Sycamore'errace Apartments 2. The firs* opki ng .east• of°Spruce Avenue *I ich•, serves - A,Apartments and Mountain vieW Apart ents �. .The third opening east gF, Spruce Avnue which :;erv,es Gxfard SFR.and the `temporary school site; 4'. Also in the, area of the temporary school is'�an'opening in the :median island foie v'ehi01es:.exiting the -`tchool rt4king-�a left turn an Serra Vista Parkway to travel•westbound; .. Eliminating tisese openings would tiring Terra Vista 1?erkway into comp,�iance ,ith the :;pcTicy between Ourch Street attd :filliken Avenue. However, :the ',,*Jtfis of the heft: turn pot lCets''for remaining" openings.would have:to be;et�aluated. Also;"the first opening. of Church-Street,does.not have°a left turn' pocke.t ; for_ vehicles ravei - Southerly to`-turn into- the."pzropdsed Junior High School. A':left turn pocket far the Jiriiiar High School .needs to bz�, coordinated witih the'` chool "project' or, the entire opening .needs: 'to be riosed to eliminat,e hazai^ious�"0 turns. 1� l , t. PLANNING CbRMISSION'SO&'RE"ORT POLICY.FOR MEDIAN, ISLANDS March- i4, .1590 Page Terra "Vista Parkway, has not been,'constrccted between Milliken Avenue,, and Church,Street. The first. opening}east o-f fMilliKeY;p that Would be required is ,at E11ena WcSt, appr�t��timately 65�1' feet east of',Mi1liKen. This does not actuary ,m S the-poke-, criteria but this `Tocation i9 necessary for access; tc}`,Belvina' day._ ,WIf then•Village <Townhouse/Duplex :fin, the loath -;?laces a drn eway across,from Eilena West, ;a left`tern pocket"wout- have to he .provided No: other openings should be alTawed. between Belvino Hay ind Mountain,-View, _Between= Mount in..V-iew.,` .' Drive- an d•n t;hurch Street,, one opening slay bent provided approximate y mid-tilock if'-it aligns wi,th .prope: accc�s;points; On Chur S!',reet bet Neen.:Haven. Avenue abd Elm:'.Avenue median ' islands are 'existing; h The first-`opening is apv�rax�mately 4dL< ' feet east of Haven"Avenue and-,has left 'turn .pockets 'for hotFt east and west hsund ;tr!af`�ic,: '-This openirq serve:: Vi'11a,'Capr.i SFR 'to 'the na th° and Ter,^a `lista Offi�-, Park s to. the south;. J This opening: ould F have"�to, be.���L, 'd,�• ta' comply.kith.. the (. polic; Tso froj;A•o traffic stand point ti. operting is.too Haven Avenue close t� . , .a mayor intersection. F'Tf this opening cloned a left turn pocket wuldhave".to bL+ prov�deQ on Terra 'IrMta• Parkway°north of Church Street for'acr�ss;ti`a "�lla Capri , see ,Exhibit °B°1 ' 'ThiS-locatinri,Would not meeic� the criteria set by;the pol .would be anj:improvemen Isting � - operti►t y on Church Street.: ,� ; The nett existing ouening,a is approxima'tely 500 feet, east,:of Terra °V.ista -.Parkway. This r,Apening serves ;the Evergr`eert w Apartments. on.`the-nortit, howrier, -ther ' i,s-no left,turn pocket for west bound traffic accessing` the_ .existine; driveway fo:r, Terra Vista Business Park on the south. This aoeningwdoes not; comply with,the policy. 'If this openings is not_', losed;` a left turn pocket fir tfiel west bound, traffic "should be nstalied ao avoid hazardous left'turn,,.movements into the 6 sti.ng driveway. on the south.- Church Street•between Elm Avenue`;Test aiid Elm Avenge East, has not been constructed; N -block• openings within, this str'"etch_ would not comply with` the'.policy,' An';opening betweeli' Avenue West an`d Spruce Street haf"previously bee'n'denied and is in the ;appeal process, ' ''For the stretch.,between 'Spruce:Street:' easterly to,.E m Avenue East, plans have`been .appr"oved trhicFr have a aid-black opening. Church Street between Elm Avenue and Orchard Avenu® :has bgon z constructed. There�,are lid"mid`block openings in the existing, median beten .Elm 'Avenue: anet',, Mrilliken. venue..,. we Betwtpn' � r, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFr REPORT P4_I0!FOR MEDIANi ISLANDS: Marcfi 14,,I990 Page 4 ?�, MTll`ken and Orchard there'isl an.opening app!rbx mately'60C feel east of .Mi1liiCen. Th7s, opening serves' the aroposed "condom�n,ums`)apartments ,on the north *and the hospital on:.the ° south.;, Tfiiss>opening tloes-'not.compty with the pol�cy,.'F�owevet�f, is critical for proper,acce:ss to the`'hospatal. ' _ Church; Street between' Orchard Avenue anu.~Rochester Avenue,has' i not been'?constructed There ,will ,`'be openings :at Orchard`; Pop law, and,' . "Terra is Parkway' which are a11.' . tee intersection's; ' If there are-any opposing driveways i#ese..wi;l'1 have left turn pocket, access;' To comply With the polfi;cykthd , should'be-no openings,between;these intersectfbAs IV `RECOMMENDATION Sta.fi recommends that the• Planning Commission adopt.,a,policy es`cab3ish:ng, a minimum full=wid.th median island length of 3G0 fe t gnat including,?any Gtaper `distances}'2for Citywide use Stsff_�allso requests .thbt the Planning (brt6ission . give direction,'--to, staff regarding the` acceptautlity of reconstructing existing•, median breaks -c�i,Church Street` and G Terra lhsta Parkwa � r y._ The "Planning Commis'ion should alsa give approvai ' far the, City ;Engineer and City Planner tol,^,finalize {�. precise master plans'ro� medians�w thin Phurr.,h Street and Term 7is.ta'Pa0kway:, Res Pily sub r City P nne j ' B3:DH/jfs Attachments Vi .: �r Exh7bit~"A" Terra sta Media Eihibit /°B" JMedian Mod'ifi6tions "' t 3 ;. # Pol�icy.ResoTution.. - t f,- 'aA� Lr � i w LU r 3 zz z wWa t emu+ w © fl0 ' yQ Q 2 ° Cl) g � t W uj z (n ZLu� cn Oaf �� �nr rnW-0 4 it. u v �., � �r��� ,`� •:,J ���j %• .ham If ow r�.r' '�-_f% ;r :J,•,�^. j � W;�f6t SPcclvl� t•.- '� ��` �j� ry- dis w f �( __��. spa: `�•�r'r i' Y pq aria;14. , TVA tl /r e , ,�f •tl / � g P /4 :a � ;, L-�1j i•1 tl �.�`/J ;Q�tl 0��'tI f��0 J�y ji h� �!e� SI \yl 4 N1. 4 rr T�ti •hi , RtSOLUT104 No 'A' RESOLUTION nF THE ?LANNING COMMISSI0h OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CC AMONGA,`CALIi7QFNIA, CSTAKISHING A POLICY FOR A " " MINIf4UM LENGTH OF MEDIAN, ISLANDS WITHIN THE CITY ,-AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THMOF ,i. Whereas, the °Panning Commission has expressed concern with th 'r design, of median i5?anvs, and in particular,, the length7of median islands a the amount of landscaping within mledian islands; and =a, WHEREAS, standards and policy direction is necessary to implement the design goals of median. const,�iictigns and WHEREAS, such policy is n,�eded to provide clear direction ;nd guidance to developer-5 and staff„ _Luke NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED that they Ranrho i camonga Planning Commission does hereby este':,.lish a policy for i,)dAi o design.aS Fo'lows; ' SECTION.1: Median-.i enatfi: Median islands shall ,46e designed -with-'a mifiimum length-:,ef. 300 f.,eet, exc lading any taper, deceleration, and stacking dfstante. SECTION II Excebtians: 7'r In certain 'situations, the mfnf;r�t-; 300-fort median length may'"no, be possible. Therefore, medians of less than: 300 feet in length may be permitted in the fallowing situations': a. In areas where it becomes necessary for traffic safety ah/br emergency.vehicle access, and/or. b. AY: mid-bierk public screed c.V)ssings where access is nf,icessiry Artr traffic movement; c. Adjacent to certain' I aid.'u8es, such as'hospitals, schools or other similar facilities ::where access 7s vital for,. public safety; and/or d. Other situations'i,as` deemed .necessary kby the City 'Plarnen•and City.Engineer+ The City Planner and; City Engineer. shall review., and approve ,all requests for median openings to determine if ` the proposal " is consistent ;with the median `policy, and, whbther_,arty, of the above exceptions is applicable., h f' �j+ T N~7 ' . , PLANNING COMMISSION.�?ES9LUTTON N0. POLICY FOR,MEDIAN ISLANDS March 14, '1990 Pag€;2 SECTION 41:I: 'Modifications"to Existinq_Median' klithin the Terra Vista Planned`Cammun ty, medians Wave beeR'QraQased and established which do not meet the,'medisil. )'ength`policy set f0.'tth in tthis Resolution, Therefore,; the Plan�iing (Commission hereby directs the City, •Planner"and City Engineer to fina;jze a :ppec se master, pl:an for, medians within Church Street, i.,tnd" "Terra<�-,Visia Parcwaj+: This ' master plan; may Include- the cio5�ng ;ff reC�Snstruction_of and relocation of existing median f;reak5/� ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990. I PLANNING COWAIS51ON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CuCAMONGA x , F BYs f{'. Larry,. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: � Brad Ouller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary,of the Planning Commission Of the City of:,Randho, Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was- duly ;and regularly introduced, passed,, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of.Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting 4f the planning Cammi. son held, on the 14';h day,.of March,:1990, by the fallowjng-vote-to-hits AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES: Comm ISSIQNEl;S; ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: I i, ` J�F f fy c A r+ ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGa 4 �r U STAFF REPORT �i DATE: March I4. tog! ia ; TO: rhal man and'Members o,"+the Planning Cgmmission FROM: Brad Buller; City Planner BY: -Jerry'Guarracino, Assistant PTa.6 ner , S6,WECT: POLICY DETERMINATION TO"C LAM FY THE 50,000 S V:E��FOOT GROSS. FL OR AREA LIMIT FUR, LIGHT WHOLEME S R Gff itQ DISTRIBUTION TYPE OF USESIN THE-INDUS RIAL SPECIFIC PLC { AREA. I. BACKGROUND: This policy determination .comes abaut N' cause of a o development, proposal located ai :-t _ "southwest` corner:- of Si�cih S%reet artd".Pi ttsbu�3 Avenue. ','!The" .site" is withi �.`the,— Bixby 4 Business Park and WInext to the Sears`Credit Office project. :The s _ site is designated its Indust,"Jel Park 'and is Siibare"A 2 . of the. Specific Plan area. ` The. Applicant; "Danny- K. Wa n g;,'s .0 proposing a clothing warehouse and .distribution "center., . The preliminary plans for the, proposed.-facility "`called for :the construction of :� .78,800 square` foot building consisti ' of 50,000 square feet,,of "warehouse ;space, i3,460 s;ua,re fee!ng' of office .space and .a 15,422;square;foot service are M as shown In Exhibit. °42'. the. proposed service .uses receiving, Iiackaging and inspection. Staff, through a Preliminary ieview or} the develo' propo aI has ieform2d the applicant ' that there. is .:al` lmitationsl of 50,000 square, feet of gress floor area .for bus ,essn classified . as Might wholesalelstorage "and distrbutiore However,. the '- applicant qi;) tions', taff's, interpretation of the defiAition;i­rdnd ` feels that "the i60,000 aare foot limitation should an"ly be applied to the warehou, istorage:"portion` , exclusive of other ancillary ms Such,"as, : Mice, show vom, .etc. Therefore,-"the t applicant 'is requesting clarification " .w r � 7 PLANNING COMMISSION-STAFF REPORT � P041CY OET6RMriATION' March 14, 1990 Paget r 11. ANALYSIS: Theindustrial Specific 'Plan defines L ht p f� es ig 4lhalesaleht Storage and Districution as (emphasis added): Li ht Nh6lesale. S taracie and clistributian: Activit es typically irc ude,,but are w' t l;mited tnr wholesaling,, storage, and `warehousing services and storage and 1holesale tv"a reta:flers from the premiises,of the i}nished §"Od and'food products.;:Activitfis un4 * this: clas;iificai:ion: sha11 be'<>conducted •.n enG.os d Wild i ms;and occupy 50.000 sour=,- feet�or less-o£r building space. Retail sales from the .,;zmisesfmay `oacur when approved as a Conditional Use.'. adhere 24 hours on-site scirveilTance`" is necessary: a caretaker -s residence ,may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit.< The sentence shor5s in bold was added in 1986 to clarify'_ he, distinction between light wholesale,`atorage. and distribution and medium wholesale, storage and"distribution. The thangs was presented to the Com ission',od Council as applyinT to;,thk entire Win building, Ync2g office areas, etc. rims inter pretation.,zhas been �"_)nsistently applied since 1996. III. OPTIONS- & Option 1 Interµr'ete 56 OOQ sour=?e loot limitation to apply to al'i acti3eit4'rs within the 't±�+.ilding, inclusive of wholesale, storage, d3s*ribut,: n and.other auxiliary uses ,such as officer or Shaw ro;. .r. ' 3. 2ption 2: Interpret tiie_:50,OD,d.square foot limitation. to only --pply to the wholesale, storage and distribution,ectivity, ' exclusive of other auxiliA,,�y uses such as office, or. showroom. Staff is of the' opinion that Option 2, the ,more liberal in Tpretation, is contrary° to the objectives of the Industitrial �Op*;ific Plan. ` Firstly, greater confusion .and ambiquity would arise in trying to d.-tfine what activities should be counted: as wholesale, storage arnd•distributior r`3iraus auxiliary rises, ",Staff weuli have to review eachT regi:est on a gfie-by-case, bails. Secondly, in most ' cases, :warehouse, storage ;and distribution �= buildings are Witt on speculatiZnn. Therefore, tht' applicant L., would have to pre-suppose certain I tenant ir�oA-GJement allocations f.� for office space and' other auxygjary, actif -Lies. In those ( . situations, it . r,11d be difficult to �usti fy a�4xiliary<use, square -z1 footages when thty are unknown. -, a / �i8 it 1 PLANNING COMMIS5ION'.STAFF',REPO�T POLICY DETERMINATION March 14 1990 PaOe '3 The use definitions between .Light, Medium and Heavy WhpTesale Storage"and"D'stri,5ution are purposefully not precise but directed,N to some basic diirisan,of use- categories. Those.cases.where,, a proposed use#borders the iadustriai Speci.fic.Plan defin tians,:,Che intent' of.. the"baio� Subareas,needs,:to be ;analyzed ,as well. Staff believes ;the ntent`of the Industrial.Specific Plan .in allowing Light,,Whd.`1.esale, :Stor-age..aand,Distribution.,uses in`,the,rIndustrial Park Subareas was to`;provi"de .the option for 'said uses +but did`not " encourage those, that would be contrary `to `other goals 'and . objectives of the specific Subareas Light Wholesale, .Sto__r,age',and •D stributiQn is.a permitted`"use in all Subareas. except: in the Haven Overlay District. - Further- in Subareas 6, 7,. 12,, 13,. 1-6', and 17, Light Wholesale; Storage';and Distribution is ,the only Wholesale;"Storage an1 .d Aistributionvse. allowed or condyt"sional;ly permii;ted." It ie. staff`s opinion that in. these Industrial�ParEG Subareas°, higher.end. uses and buildings were' intended. Larger buliw;ings'~for ttese type of uses tigers .directed by the 50,000 square fsot standard to`?the, den'' 'I Subareas where" in ."fact Medum-Whol"esele. Storage and" Dstribution uses are permitted and conditionally permitted. Medium Wholesale; .* Storage and Distribution by definition, .wogld i0 rude. those buildings where said asses, occupy oVeV"1 D! 00.,square feet<,. Staff does. not believe the IndustriaU Paris subareas we're intented for Wholesale, Storage, and Dis'tribution,,Centers that" exceed �50'000,isquare feet in size'..and in F' t eR,xo�arages` such,.�ases. to-the �General� Industrial Subareas; In .,iR irk-told,-staff believes that. Option 3 more accurately interprets tine ;intent 'of the :Industrial Specific.Plan., IV. RECOMME14DATION. Staff, recommends that the Planning `Commission support,,,Optian 1 through minute action.,_ Respectfully ;submitted, Bred Bdller 000,� City,Planner BB•JG;js Attachments; Exhibit °A" Siit`t�no->,,of Land Use Type. by Subarea Exhibit 'it" Project Ta !jlation (s Exhibit "CH - Elevations, Exhibit "Q" - Site Plan" Exhibit "V1 - Persaective dd TABLE 111-1 FUMiMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA 0 PERMITTEL v5E $ CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE, NOTE: Non-marked Uses Not Permitted USE TYPES Land Use' i",) GI GI GI GI!GI IP IP GI ui GI GI IP GI GI Hl iP IP �_�,Subara" NO i 2 3 415 6 7' 8 9 1011 1213 14 15 1617 MAIdIIFACTiIRBFdC, � Custom e • • e • :a • a • a s: ® o • Lleht • • • o o a W • o ♦ ® ® • Medium $ �!; +!+ N o Heavy Minimum Impact Heav K ����. t'JFFICE PRCFE�S1t3NAi., DESMN &RESEARCHi r _ Administrative&Office y {+ + • . .; +g+ ' ,� .�. • a Professional/Design:Serv'nes ® +1 .p. ,I, o • �+ ,p+ a +t+ +I. • a4 research Services: at e s _o <• s+ • • • •, • e WHOLESALE.5TlrRAGE &DIVAIB IOlvl i �J�; Storage _ $� ® $ $ $ • n • �r ® • e 6ti 6 _ o Heavy ,�, ® a COMMERCIAL Agriculturai/Nurseryr Supplies&Servloes • a • Animal Care +#+ ♦ $ $ +l+ Automotive Fleet Storage Automotive Rental/Leasing' p a p + a+s 4� a + + ry Automotive/Light Truck Repair-Wo-ir .II. + 0 gyp. 4-018 Automotive/Truck Repair-Maio• c + p 0 • 1+ +' Autt+motiva Sates ,¢ , Automotive Service Station ++,p + $ + " I+ ,{+ + Building Contractor's Lattice&Yards Building Contractor's Storage Yard ® Y. - 1-+ Bulidmg Maintenance Services o ® • ;- • • a • Building&Lighting Equipment Supplies&Sales • + • + + • •` $ �o + + euslness Supply Retail&SorAces ® • • • • ,e! e e BusiAess Support Services a e +t. a s + • p 3 +�. + • ,e • • • p mn Coumlcation Services e e 7 3 a p ,� p ® ,, p `® Convenience Sales&Services + .� } �. {+ "i + + + .a + ;�+ , + + ,I, Eating&Drinking Eetablishmants m 6 48 IN e; ® a v sv ale Entertainment + + + Extensive Impact ca"W rclaD ag Fast Food Sales + +{+ + ++t. +{. ♦ +4+ +{+ +F #' Financial,Inwrancs&Real Estate Services • • ME • Food&Beverage Sales + + + + ,q $, .g. + fit+ + +{+ Funeral&Crw=W :Servlc•s> + $ +Heavy Equipment Sates&Rentals $ �. ,. •�. .+ ,�. ;�. Hotel/Motel �° a • • J Laundry Services • • p • p • MedoWff0aWCw&.s3arvlcm 41 + $ A:. .� ,�. � • Personal Services $ $ + +I+ f �, •g. "ds +{. + Petroleum + + Re creatianal Facilities #- + +9+, �+ �• + + • +�; + + • • • • 4 Repair Services • • ,P • s e 2; Scrap OoerBttort - civic `•F 3 S i✓ m! /c +t « +3 [a Administrative Civic Services a ® _c • • e o sv 0- Cultural a + $ + +i+ $ +t+ $ + Extensive impact Utility FacillU :+� $+ �• Flood ControllUdlity Corridor • • • • + o • a • o • ® • Public Assembly. +E` + $ Public Safety&Utility Services +t+ + + + + + + $ + ♦ + _ + ,{+ + + $ Re! (81ous Assamb!z + + 0 IP-ir„iatrial Park GI-Ganaral�ndus.r 14IIiHt-Minimum impact Heavy industrial NO-Haven Ava.Overlay Cistric { { /[ HI-Heavy industrial 6 61 �_ti r1 M.f des VO We Q ffi =3L m ® ® = o e!+n cgs CIS ,e4^ ca. ®� V a agi C4 Onen in �, en e 6I C4 N W.d .rj M ^� N H ram+ . O� r ja I g OZL ca eq i L 63 ea A�,c ,Gx R moo", Arm �k,' 3 Flge= -!h t? t a oo �. r �\\{ p r T i � t it+t��„y }jam 4y a k ,+ •h IkC ONS � S� i r 11 ♦ 1 � r;" 1 kill 1 h ( 1�, t �xF • 1r �s � a t k ' S f1TLF� CITY OF 4ANCFIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OATS: March 14, 1990 " it TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Diane O'Neal, Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: AS 939 LEGISLATION BACKGROUND' AS 939 is .recycl.ingL legislation recently enacted .by the State o'f Caltfornia.'` s The, objective of AS 939, is to: develop and impldmdnt a..Source :Reduction "and' Recycling Element. The source' Reduction' and Recycling; EI,ement ,will"`,be. an addition to the City's General Plan. Attach,ed,., for your review:!is a summary' o f AS 939. The preparation of this Element.will be coordinated by;Administratfcn with the support of Advanced Planning. Administration's input into this process,Will be.' through the City's recently established Envi�p'nmenta.l Management Commisr:on. A,' Staff Report was ;,prepared "for the Environmental .Management .Commission at its, February 22, 1990 meeting. Th Is Staff Report provides an ,overview and",proposed' work program for'AS 939 and "is.attached for"your,review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the g: Commission, review the attached work pragratn,;, schedule and provide comments.. ,J RespectiveZy,Submtted, Diane O'Neal Administrative Analyst Attachments: Summary of AS ;939 Staff Report Submitted, to the, EMC dated February"-22,`199a STEM d- v t` CMMZ 'Moms • Repeals Title 7.3 of the Goeernment Cadea relating "to all aspects of Solid wasta MannexA at. • Recadifies Part 2 of Division 5 of the Health and Safety.;Coder relating ;to: O Creation Iand AutGtrity of GarbA70 Disposaal Diatricta O Creati'on and Authvritf`of Garbaga -abd R®fu>$® Disposal.bistricts O Franchises by Counyi®ass O city Carmaga oI9P*sasContacts O Solid :wa,stcj Enterprises, Enacts the, californa Intagrratad #caste tsaa�eamant Act of 198Q which: O Establishes as ne�y solid s►ast® g�eent hierarchy: O creates a new californi&I Zatarrated Waste managemdnt saa►s (O&aard"). O Abolishes the County S®lid Napts P amagenent Plan and Irequires My ;Intcgratad Waste s ainagmBent plans. O Establishes- a nor"stabs` solid tiaeeee tipping geaetr. Q Impactsffien rrtion/inponation` of wastes across juriadictional oaassdarics. O Requires T+oal Enfare t Agancioffi to be' state. certified, by the O c2aah+ga;ss tam etaato's sole in 'tom 4. facilities tgiaq of solid waste , O Requires MIMataryian MIs and .the state. O Plc new restrictions on incinaarators. • Section 40051 V*401tien tMtLin. ivxamntiftg.stwte so- lid,;waste law theamRdash ,a 11 10m1 I ag4mcies (cities, county, 4 s inl districu) shave. ® Proaota the Poll im is gOwntpracticas in orlder of '�ri®ritys i• s®sarct:cy7,Y c�. Envir® ea aid dS®crastlon ®! tits city Or. county. . O MXimize all feasible source reduction, recyclihq and composting options" in ordar to reduce the amount -at solid waste that must be disposed of by- tr3nsfntmation; ar� Land disposal. = , SOCtion 40031 is jj2t intended to prohibit or dalay the d�svalopment oP now or expanded landfill Capacity. section ai7Ao r development ent counties-to pr®par® ;a siting eiament wtich'ldent fies�areas to be used for the development of adequaef.; disposal capacity. This section;axpr®ssly'requires that the xdentigicatioin of tl;es®. s'ites occur comarld with the davelo mangy and implementationfth of r®cycling pxograaa. P • A similar Waste,' �naqQM®nt hierarchy has b®en in state statute for several years for hazardous waste. On,: n or about July 14 199of the, ;California Ent NPaasagement 9orsd will cease to exiat° 3ffi sai1A ba rape any saste nec�full-time, six-m e r b®erd. • `art ale Z, chapter 2 of the: t i� lat3rl to the pa�paraticn, adoption end taavisi®n off.,t C f a repealed. ' ctiv�Smntarve R yes Q ls.n�w (.• n® wq�S.' ° The 'elimination Of the c s. a No County Will have a debintgnuent toSim U It is no longer nscessrtry to sad anawndment,ta ah� cos ®veer tip an axtstirag lacnity ,is' e4 o is sited: a,-nev,facility, C C®n cs by tom+ Iftrd "fob all $ i� to im the local, t $sr a i,� ent v� a e - A pis° O T!a® Hoard no"I sr has..afty,sntaority �a CjQny'a- Vomit based on rim t3l.Q � ®r an iaaru3isency with a 1 1 plan• C �+ ! va® aeoae Rm�leibR as a CavmaV Q �1$ea �19t9 md�ne� t aso,•• ss.m;+q y • In addition to the o tin Veen seta eail3 a �� cont Per ton fsa on all solid, s o! a rye 1. 399.e. ' The► . !M Will be due,ffiithin,'zH"44ys at>the' " of cam r mortar.. • State lava all the fee to in to 7H its pear .tea on July 1, logo if is n d t a State law allows the fas ,'to be increased to $1,00, per ton on Jul 1 499I if tho incrGame a.needed_to fund the s�ata�s progress. S 939 establishes a totally nev planning process'at the county and cixty level for solid waste management:. County Tawk � e On or before March 1, 1990 each IgM= must convene a;Task Force to assist in coordinating the development of City Source Reduction ; and ReeyeliAq Elements. The Task Porcals membership is determined by the board of stgpporvisorm and s majority of the cities which contain',a majority of the population. Tho Task Force must. C 2dentd2y, solid wait® management issues of countywide or regional concern. 0 Determine the need for solidi waste -collecti6n, Av:Zs,- processing facilities nd'market ng strategies that;a4rve more than one local jurisdiction., O Facilitate the develd t of' multi-'jurladi:tional arranqammUs for the marketing of recyclable materials. 0 Facilitate co�lict resolution between city saa=8 reduction.— and recycling plans. 0 Develop prom.'Aurea to guide the development of a countywid Siting zb t-. City Sotlrc® R��S:��QR Bad �+a�.wiaiiw� �1_letPits® On or'before biev g. ioe4, each ,city must adopt a Source Reduction and Recycling Ill t. The el t bust place ppr zary amphasis on the impleentation of all feasible e' reduction, recycling and comp�ostiaag p vhilm idsntifyi* the asanuart of landfill and incineration cappecitr that will be newed' fsr.solid waste which cannot bW r , Mgpol0d or, composted. Each Source Redwtion ,�.Racyclinq glement must include: 0 aerica�ioaa c AA . 0 A iea r , neau. cciqv,nent. O 0lid eva®tt faesilitly ,c appas.ity cownent. O' An zducation lie infaftation cotponent. 0 ` A funding,caipomilt. 0 A sppecial vasto' ts®nt., 0 ta� 6�h®�� SZ tO Can". 6brat l �QtIR'�V UYCe Rid te+Pi nr� 8ri� Re n+l irrr QS ra,uwo.w On or b®fors <JantiaL'y 1, 1991 (this will probably be. extended to July i, 1991), each county :must adopt a Source Reductioc, and Recycling Element,for the unincorVaratead areas of the le The content of the county elements are identical t0 the city, elements, e'QUl1tVW�f�Q � na rt wwernte Each county ,must prepare - ft. countywide , Sitineq E1sffisnt which ` idantifsu areas to'bo .used for the; development of transformation or disposal 'capacity. Each S:.Lrnq Eesseaft muaat include: O An estimate of-. ® amount, of capacity years. P y nes 4,',ad for the .next 15 O An estimate of existinq cap�-,city - O The identification of specific areas for the location of now or axpandod. ditpcsal ar,tranaf6rastionr facilities. ` The content of the Siting E1Oaeht and the process for adoptiatg end as:endinq' the Siting' Element Is similar tc the COSWHP with two exceptions.- The Siting Element only idimtifies incinerattions .end disposal facilities — not t f v stations. P �. The are that new or sxpaand' - Acuities be consistent stiff the Siting Sl t the the county should do t consider a the 1939=!Q COSM Revision as 4 ct:atagic Plan ine® tORaerael Plans. T28e County Yn ttd WdSto KMqQZMt Plan includes all of the following= t O city xon, ction am Recycling clemants. O CMM 7304rft Pieduciton R&,yClL tq Element. O 00=4videUting judamat, :, • The'schaftle for sukalssion of County'tote gratesd Waste Management Plans is as Poll a 4 Janua-Ty 1, 1992 for ties with imam tho fire years of rmaiAi:nq landfill cgpagi . t> C Januarys 1 3,293 -fm `ccunti with five to eaghC ye .of capacity. ; . a: z , t +1 {i O January 1 1994`for counties which have more than eight years Of landfill capacity.` Hots the County: Integrated Plan and the Siting ;`lament m st' bia approved by thui majority O the cities contsiniag ttia majority of the population.. The. COunty Integrated waste Management Plan and its elements mustbe,rmviewed and revised,, it necessary, every s years. Rabvcl i na 293" Each city,and e©urty Source Reduction and Recycling Element must provide for: O Diversion Of 2.33 of all solid cvo3st® q®nrrat drby January 1, ISi93. ;; 0 Divarsion of 3014 by tha year,2000. • The Board Canr grant eexemptions to the gealsa and mpprova a rate lower than Sot>,if the Board dstdrsine.0 tha local agency in mooing the"maximum 'amount_feasible. Failure to mast thfte goals could rasgl` in starts finea oaf up to S I6.6AA_AA ns� dav� t�Ai<]DPQV$� • Local Re Cyajinq Lp Wenta and .county Integzatedr Plans, mast be eg approved by the now Vitrat®d Warta Management Board, gsilura by 71 any city or aosanky to 'SUbRit An, ascceptasbld: plan crItaldr result in state fines of tap to a ms_an. Str w C-t±ide�t in®: • State guides*'"..Mo for the :Preparation of Scurce Reduction and Racyclinq '. tea $he al,d'be cut; araurAmay 1, 1990. Lacal F®® at*wwa • tach city aaffi Wmty`is autbcrixed to ; .fs t® pay for they plc U aG iarpl tf+ticMe ct i Gl htS sitinq di am the In tted haft t at the f mkt bar Y Mlle to the cast of praparttion asdcption. . Each city and, County is autbar $od to asses special fees, got county. _ on- tM ticn'at haste f outtik', iha, : j- - k 3 f The 1 a". atatas that no city or county can;a.cport�aastn to 'any., oth•z�Surisdidtion unl-Asa tr.o city or courxty hat-an approved Source Reduction and Rn rcl Elns®at aflat/or County i;�tograted was.a ' Manegeaent Plan. Thpsovislan does not take'effect i.f`uni anu'ary �,,`_ 1, 1993'. ror counties with less ;than five yearw of ramaininq ,, 1andPY?a�cspneity. othor,F�o�t3ns vill,reeei�re addit ®nai'tiae. Require* the 9oard to. adopt;; by AUquat 1, 1991, cmrtification segulatio8s for local enforceffient;aganci®s. Each U8! must msah, ap•Citia criteria, to be -certified .to perform p®rmitting and inspection functions. Requires, ."a Board, to establish a spacial ,unit to investigates lle+3 1, abandoned or closed solid ,waste disposal 4i,tas, toe insure. prot on ®f public health:and the m wi;Onsent•L ' Prohibits thr. iasua�nc• of a permit for tt�• inctineration of solid waste unlss®:- o The project used "t°ront-end s*0yclingp `m•tEsods" to s•mmov to the muaisum.•xt•nt, oasibl•` , r•cyplabl• materials front; the waste atrem.l 4 ma is contint&44 test" ter,haaard®ua constituents. �f OVERVaER MW PROPOSED WORK, PROORMt, FOR A8 039 ` February 22, 1990 Page 3 Finally, as outlined in the 'proposed work program, there will be the - submission of key progress reports which represent the milestones' in the project_ Thess reports will provide an 'in-depth review of the project by the Commission. ' Respectfully submitted, Diane O'Neal Administr--eive Analyst DO/pr `( 90-61 I ` t. l' �2'F t 'L414CD�R ""E tir CIOR �R 0, 1 , R T I I N k I }' I b �.t y I i lt: ;a _ tiF �yl 4�2 :i --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMPNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 22,•,- 1990' TO Chair and Members of the Environmental Management Commission. FROM: Diane O'Neal,. Administrative Analyst SUBJECT: G7n0RV1EU,AND PRO'VOBED WORK RO'3RAM .EOR:AS, P39 RZC3MHLWDhT10P5 It is reeommended the Environmental Management Con is3ion adopt the attached OvervieV and-Work•,Program for;.AB 939. BACKG1ROU10 The Environmental Management Commission adapted its initial work program that. includes: AB '939 at its January 25, 1990 meeting. The. Commission was advised that, an overview, analysis: and a proposed work program of AB_9301 would be provided:at its.February 22, 1990 meeting. The overview of AB 9'39 is ,remonstrated in Exhibit "A.e' The?, overview, of AB 939 provides ' the. objectiv® of: this legislation andhow'the objective will be accompl,JAhed. . The objective of AB 939 is to develop and mplemeA, a Source, Reduction and;Recycling, :Element. In order to; accenplish this, staff has definmi the tasks, resources and schedules` that will be `�iecessa ►. The tasks will be to develop,. implement, evaluate,: modify, monitor and provide an advisory capacity of AB 939.• distinction between monitoring AB 939 and providing an advisory component is the. day-to-day operations. Monitoring the program involves the actual. day- to-day operations whereas the 'advisory component provides for periodic reporting. The resources listed identify those entities: who will provide input and-direction to each task: Stdff has ;list:d 'cvariable�s" under resources be.nusa as :AB 939 shakes out, .it is possib a liste$.e itionalite will affect , <s, OVERVIEW AND PROPOSED WORN PROGRXL FOR AR 939 February 22, 1990 Paga ,2 resources. These variables will.be addressed as they occur and will be adapted ;to the scheduling,of "B 939. The schedule portion of Exhibit "A" provides a time frame for accomplishing each tass•of 'AB 939." The attached Exhibit "B" presents a�n .analys•is of AB ' 939. i. The pttrpase of the analysis is, to separate -he material_ contained in AL 939 into its component parts and to provide a summary. As indicated in Exhibit "B", AS 939 is composed of mine,; components. These nine components 'will: hd integrated to i produce "a Source Reduction and Recycling,_. Element' which addresses the management of solid waste generated-within the;; City of ,.Rancho.:'Cucamonga. ' The proposed work program, Exhibit "C@',, has 'been developed. 'to implement the Source Reduction and Recycling Element. The pu:.pose of the work program is' to provide A .clzrono- logicAl listing° of tk� activities required to implement the Sourcj Reduction and Recycling Element.:- .'Additionally the, work program identifies time framos'for each activity. ' The proposed_work `program takes each task-'identified in Exhibit: ' "A° and lists the necessary items to accomplish these tasks. As with any proposed. work program, it:`must' be' presented to the City Council for'its Consideration and adoption. The proposed work progrram ,recommends a consultant be obtained to assist staff in preparing the Source Reduction and Recycling Element/EIR. Also, it is 7 recommended a , Steering Committee composed of the :Ceunc'il's Subcommittee for the. Environmental Management Commission, the Chake, of. the Environmental Hanagementi, Commission, and '.staff, be' formed to select the consultant. The proposed selections will then be presented to the City Council for `their. consideration and adoption. Additionally, the proposed work- program recommends the,.con sultant's work .program be reviewed by the :Planning Commis sion. Staff is including the Planning commission in the xe view process brcause. AB 939 required that the' Source lteduc tion and Retiyeling Element-a, as part of`the Caty' ., General Plan., O�SR� w .�&� P130P®BRD �O PY+'OGRAd�t February.22, 1Q90 Page 3 Finally., as outlined in the psoposed work program,' there 'will, be the' -`submission o� ;,key- progress reports c�hich -,. represent the ffiilesto:qs in'the project These-reports wall provide an in-n deptDi. review,of.,the project b-the.:Comm3ssian. Resp®ctfully subm:�tted, c Piane'O°Nell . Administrative Ana DO/ps 90-61 4x +t "lt 1 b ' L i u t` HXHtB11T "A' Overview Objective Source Reduction dz Recycling,PIM TAM .. ScliftbULE CM's Stain' Emc 1/91}i519i-; Contract Haulers Planning Comm . DEVELOP" Afir.Planning Eire. C1?Director Budget Engineering A9939.Consultant Comm.Sere.Mgr. SWMD Emergency Serv.Mgr. Task force Chamher of,.Commee CMIS Stair ` SWARD }.. 7/91 IMPLEMENT Contract Haulers ' Schools 1 Engineering CCWD ` 13tiidget Chamber of Commerce. CiU 'Consultant CKS Staff' Emergency S^'� ;; . . 7/92 EVALUATE Contract Haulers ' EMC A6.•Planning AB939 Consultant Engineering SWA;D., Comm:Serv.Mgt'. CKS Sta1C MODIFY Contract Hauler Engineering 04'®Staff Trash Master 9/92-i ootng MONITOR Et�aeering Semi-annual Reports to CM Comuzi.Serv.Aigr. Esaergesacy Seer.Mgr. CAi'e Statl (i/93rerj! ADVISO 6 inos, Wi E?ViC . AB939Consultant lead Dept. Variables = J; EXN 1 SIT AMYSIS AB 939 is a comprehensive legislative bill'regvAring cities N. to develop and implement a source reduction and recycling plan. The source reduction and recycling plan is defined as a program for the management of solid waste generated within the City.; The City source reduction and recycling element shall place primary emphasiFs on implementation of all feasi- ble source reduction, recycling and composting programs while identifying the°'amount of landfill end transformation capacity that will be :needed for solid waste which cannot be reduced at the source, recycled or composted. The source reduction and recycling element shall include the following components: 1. A Waste Characterization Component 2. A source Reduction Component 3. A Recycling Component 4. A Composting Component 5. A Solid Waste Facility 'Capacity Component 6. An Education and,Fublic.Information Component" 7. A Funding Component 8.. A Spacial Waste Comno.Yent, 9. A Household Hazardous'Wasie Component These nine components make up the Source Reduction and Recycling dement and are defined as follows: w, Characterisation compgn Ak This component shall identify the constituent -materials which compose solid waste generated within the'asrea affected by the City source reduction and recycling element. The information shall be statistically representative of the solid waste generated within the jurisdiction of the ,:City aied shall reflect seasonal variations. The constituent matoriale shall' be , id(entified by volume, percentage in weight or its volumetric' equivalent, material ' type' and source of generation, ,which includes residential, commer- cial, industrial,,governeental or other sources. sou ae Reduotion Component . The City source reduction component shall include a program and implementation schedule which shows the methods by which the City will, in combination with the recycling and composting components, reduce a 'sufficient amount of solid waste generated ,within the' jurisdiction of the City source reduction and recycling element. ANALYSIS ` Page 2 The City source reduction component shall .describe the methods the .City wile. use to determine the am and categories of-wfid'wastes to be diverted from,landfill dis— posal through, sd=`-,ce reduction. The City source reduction component shall describe new facilities and the. expansion of existing f acilitiesil which will be needed to irt�woment_yhe source reduction, recycling And composting a►nrts. The City source i,ae ictinh car-p:n nt shall evaluate rate structures to red=6 t,ie amo _n ;;'.i�,_astes that generators produce and other, soiq•c`e .reductionistrategies, including, but not limited tro, ,c .bgrams ' and,}`economic incentives ' to reduce the use of 'ncnricyciable materials, replace dispost- able materials and,- prod}cts with reusable materials and products, reduce packaging, and increase the efficiency- of- the use of ,paper, cardboard, glass', metal and ; other materials. Ra�a3lina Comooa®at : i. The City recycling component- shall include a program and implementation schedule which ;shows,the methods'by,which the+ City will, in combination with the source reduction and composting components, reduce la sufficient amount, of solid waste generated within the jurisdiction. The City recycling Icomponent shall describe the types of materials which will be recycled under the programs. The City recycling component shall describe the methods the City will use to determine the amount and categories of solid wastes to be diverted from landfill disposal thr-ugh recycling.The City recycling component shall describe new facilities and the expansion of existing facilities which will be• needed to implement.the recycling component— The City recycling, component shall describe methods='which . will be used to increase the markets ;for recycled materials,; include, but not limited to, an evaluation of the' feasibility of procurement preferences for the :purchase .of, recycied .products. Each City may grant a price, .preferenae to encourage the purchase, of recycled products. The abo�ant of the price preference shall, be determiner) by the City: `l _43 x"' RYSZ9 s Page 3 The, City recycling component, zhall evaluate . industrial, ` commercial, residential, governmental and other curbside, mobile,, drop off„ and buy-back recycling programs, manual and automated material rece`rery, facilities, zoning and building code' changes whid,'h, encourage` recycling of materials, A*+drXste structures!'which, encourage recycling of . materials. Caasboat�ing Co�a�r�nen� 'The City compost3w`(,11component shall include"• a program and implementation sciiec;dle which sh..©ws the methods by>which the City will 'n cd"b oration ­wiith the, source, roaductioss and recycling. compone,��rts)} reduce aruff iciest a�c�.Mt- of solid waste generated Sri(thin•-.the, jurisdiction The City composticomponent ,shall, decor ba thm types of', materials which wi11 be' composted under the'progiram. The City composting component shall describe the methods the City will- use to determine tte "amount" and categories of solid wastes to .be diverted from landfill disposal through composting, Ci The City composting component shad. describe, any new facilities and' the expansion If,e.;4sting faoilties which i will be needed to impl"enr the c��Nosting'component, The City composting component shall describe the methods' which will be .used to increase the markets fag composted` materials, including, but not limited to, and evaluation of the -feasibility of ;procurement ,preferences for the purchase of recycled products Each city may grant: a .pride prefer-, ence to encourage the purchasf-=•of composted products. The amount of the price preference shall be dtetarmined ';by the cityr r 4 Edt�or�tiah end l d raatet�tien C�aoneat The City. education and public 'infoa-aation component shall) describe 'to 'the board .how the! City' will increase publio awareness of, and. participating in, recycling, source reduction.and composting programs. i� i� ANALYSIS Page 4 Funding Compom®nt The City funding component shall identify,and 'specifically describe projected- costs, revenues and revenue-souses to implement all components of .the City source reduction and recycling element. eceoial waste Com neat" The City special waste component shall describe existing waste handling and disposal practices for special wastes, including, but not 'limited to, asbestos and sewage sludge which is.,not ,hazardous waste. The component, shall identify'' currant and proposed program, to ensure the proper handling,' reuse and long-term disposal of;special wastes. Facility capacity Comeoa+ ) t The City solid waste facility capacity- component . shall include, but it is not limited to,' a projection of the amoun°: of disposal capacity, which will be needed to accom- modate the solid waste generated within the City preparing the element for a 15-year period,. reduced by,_ all of the following: (a) Implementation of source reduction, rep,„cling and composting programs pair ired by this part or through ixnlemmentation of other waste diver- sion programs. (b) Any ,permitted processing, destruction, or transfor mation capacity which will be available during the 15-year planning period. (c) All disposal or transformation capacity which has been. securfAl through an agreement' with another City or-County or through an agreement with a. solid waste enterprise. Mouashold Maaardo+a'Fast® Cam ' nano The City household hazait'dous waste component shall include a program and implementation schedule for, the collection, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste`generated by resi dences within the jurisdiction of the'plan. f �r i' PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM i 2-22-90 Present Overview of AB939 to Environmental Management Commission (EMC) 3-14-90 Present Overview atsd Proposed Wask ,Program of ' AB939 to"Planning Commission 3-21-90 Present Overview and Proposed;Work;Program of AB939 to City Council for their.Consideration and Adoption 3-22-90 Staff,Develops Request For Proposal (RFP) [Source = Reduction and Recycling Element and:EIRI 4-26-90 :FMC Reviews RFP 5-09-90 Planning Commission.Reviews RFP 5-16-90 Recommend RFP to City Council 'for :their Consideration and Adoption, 1 5-17-90` Mail RFP,�s to Consultants 6-18-90 "Deadline to Submit Proposals 6.29-90 Steering Committee Reviews Proposals 7-19-90 Steer.ag Committee Interviews Finalists and 1Reco:,mmends Selection,of Finalist 8-01-90 Recommend 'Selection of Conetiltant and Award of,` w, Contract to Cit+-�ouncfl,for their Consideration-and Approval, 8-15-90, Staid Meets w/Selected Consultant 9-26-90 Share. Consultant's Work Program wjPlanning I Commission ,h 9-27-gp Share Consultant's Work Program Md i CNVt ,.x P�p qq���SE W Rgp { PAIK 1:1-01-90 Implement Consultants Work'Program 1-03-91 Status;Report of Consultant's Work 2-04-91 Status Report 3-01-91 Status Report 4-01-91 Preliminary Draft Element Reviewed by Steering; Committee 4-24-91 Revised Draft Element Presented to Planning Commission:_'' 4-25-91 Ttevised Draft Element Prese� ecC to EMC 4-30-9.1 ;Conduct Arty hollow UIi w/Ste ering Committee 5-15-91 Final Element Pre ented!.to City Council for their Consideration and Adoption 5-25-91 Submit EI,K?nent to Com"Ity 6-01-91 Meet w/Steering Committee to, Coordinate Implementation of Work Program -24-91 Status Report=of Implementation of Element to, Planning Commission 7-25-91 Status Report of Implementationof Element to-EMC' 8-07-91 iStatus Report of Implementation of Element to-City Council 1-08-92 FYnal.Status Report of Implementation of Element.to City Council - 7-00-92 Evaluation of ImpLinentation of AB939 1� U ksa � s rr ,� iPHICOPMED WOPX PROG DATL AGTTiTLTF - -� 8 00-92 Modtfy' 'Implementation of AB939 As fuggested Ay; Evaluation�of,AB939 - 9-00-92 Monitor Ongoing Operations of A9939 6-0A-98 Propose Trash Masted>Position(s) 7-00-93 Ongoing Annual Status lzaparts .I ti_ y Y , 1 L �ni ' 3 tc. I T of