No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/08/08 - Agenda Packet NO r f f r �7:NG c — r o ��N: ��, :1 �� ra t EN 19Z7 a WON AV Atl6UST 8, 1990 I:'00 �•,�; f- m-coca ` i MIC;'CUTER :. C6U6dCIt 10500 CIVIC'CEIs M.DRIVE � - iEyD CiiC ,. Ce96.IF0RAlIdI 1s ra; `w= x Y:. Piei�ge of Allegiance II. Ro11- Call .t t� Co�nissioner Chltiea CotnnisslonexTolstoy; Commissioner McNiel .Commissioner Weinberger— ; Commissioner Melcher= i " III. Rnaourece®ents., �� ' t. IV. �spe°oVal of Minutes Adjourned Meeting' of.July or I990 July 25, 1990 Consent,Calendar The ��following Consent Catendar i tens are expected; to ,bE; routine and:non-..controversial. They will be'acted on,by°,the Carrmssion at one tune without discvf$ion ; If anyone has concern over any item, it should be r,=;fvod for discvsto�} , ` A. fi1ME. EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 1387I ? MtORrJ'S ` res en a WHIM s on an esign rev o o f s ng e.;family :lots 0n. 18'.Ol acres''0f .land in. the Very Lord,Residential 6istrict (less`than'2 dwelling:units per acre), 7ocated;,north of .Wilson, east, of`Hermosa, souti' of Hillside,'; and. rest.; of ,'Mayberry Avenue ` APN: Z01-111=6;.11, 13, and:32 4 3� .�, r �4 z� f q , 1 i � 113a Tii77�RV Ci�L�\9��Jt.'.. - ;'3 Ow nl items ,are public hearings Cn:uieic canceled � irtiPivcduais -mxy vato "their opzhfart_ a the, related pro�teci: Please.unit to'be reeagniaed by the ,Ma€nmh GM, address :the Corm�issl�n b y statin 9 fur'.narr� and'address r fit such,. apirlons shall be limitedta ,5 minutes per initiividuaY foreuch project Meese sign in after speaking,= "NADI ICATIAN,TA' CONDITIANAi USE AERMI11i`t8l 12. �w {dE:S1 ERN � reques or CorCeP F R5 e77,—ail it in the Tor Vises`a4wn,;Center, Tvtated at; the northeast Cnrner of 'tavert':Avenue and Foothill Poo evard - APPic 1077.442h05 96 and 1 ; " (Con.finued` r.i?om July;25, .19go C. : I N�IIRO dNfEASTA(. ASSESSMENTTENTATIVE PARCEL. ilAP,,23113 - �tOAtt"Y' v:s ,ono . acres n u parse s in the.�Very tots ResientiaT District ',(less tban.;2°dwelling unfits'=per-acre}•, Tacated ort 'the ,Werth side of Strang !.arts,` east of Garne7ian Street APii; IA61 27,I�A8`. (�aiitinued: frog auTy Tan D. AMlEli3ENT ?A '8NIF4RGt'. SIGN PFx�GRAiiE�Ii.lEi:'S:OUTPOST n:;appea o s s: ec.s.on. enY a s. gn ;program etnendrIent, located. a the. northeast Corner_of i ootJ�iTT ;and ,Archfbald`. APN IA77-6.41-71 1 dContinued fran�,auTy>25, 199J,) E. `REVISIOA�:TO TREE RE 04Ai AEgNIT. 88' BCER ARGi;ITECTS ree remova perM _ w c was associated. with Tenta'iive: Trat;t 23886: and ''corner aoI ifse Permfit 4841i.located at, the northemst f earner of Base -Line . Road and Eti' 'a AVeaue APN: 227-522-01A2, A3 artd A4. {Continued from July' 25"F. ENVIRONMEI#AL ASSESSMW AND, TENTATIVE .TRACT 13859 e: eve oilmen . o. ire ng un s. on TS acne'of land ire;the High, Residential District (24- 30 dwetTing units: per acre;), located the Terra. Vista Planned Community; `on ,tine northwest=corder° �sf Spruce Avenue. and C,hui ch'Strget.- APN� 1077491-13 and' IB. (Conti rtued from Al l I1,.'199A.} r G.' ENItIRONiE1iTAL '=ASSESS1itT AND VESTIdG: TENTATIVE TRACT' _116 =`t' e,.aeve oilmen .:_0 f �d�n osn n tqn .un. son 'T5"acresoF land °iipn they =A9erdium=high RQsidentfiaI.iaistriCc �14�2�k dwellin . units< prr a rd3 in the Victoria Planned.tb*uniiyA tbcated_ail,' tt�e northeast: corner of Base T:in0 Road and TiKen A;i !rs' `ApN 22J-6gl�bl: / y } ti� Z4 Y a. � i r:x a H ,"nVIWAgNTAL ASSESSMENTz ANV CONDITIONAL-141SE PERMIT CA V ROUSE, CO. e � an e accoun , ng.o ce .usQ n ari 8,339°square; foi V,VlI 9ding r r on 4I acre of land n .the General Industrtai``Oi;stric , Suba1^ea- 8 -010 the' Industrial Specific Plan, located'ai � i076S: disar� Court.-.APid '.R09 142;'67 I. TIME E,XTEFf`,,ION FOR'.FIESIGN .REVIEW-180 3 - A: E. S6tITH v; 0 eV,e,opmen o Apar en urn s on acre, bf l,apd in the. M4dium"High-.ResitlentiaT Bistricil. (i4 24 dwelling units per acre), located''at VI 6 end, of;$ie'rra: {Madre Avenue'-west.of EdOh Street APN: 207 25I522, '= Nll. Director's'Re�sts 7, J: ';GRADE• SEPARATION AT' FOOTHILL BOULEVARD' MD ;.St1UTHFiid' A 'IL FICT a 1E;;II.' Co isxion Business Ill. lic nts, . This is_°th arid,place for the General4.,pubLie to'address , the'.Cadnission . ';Items 'to W discussed here'ire thosa_uhich do not,a7ready appear .on this.a01 genda: Xo Adriticatt' �{ � �€ �Ismziyig Cam 9sion•,. at adopted Admiixistrativev ReguiaEions that set. an �t 00 P.M. aajourrsrgnt,"tinw.. 7f items go beyond that tirre� they-,s qoow only with the . consent.of "the Car►m'ss�on . ; , i , 5 x r 7 I LY rr f( J+ a M ' Y 1 tagVIG, z to maa, ncleee° Alsecs mm on Het an bO 60d .e rAli Pe 'ettt rely ftm ti• 14 "f C4GitA AA Eu�tf( -C i r �. Careor�tteik4ia+saili, eteawse; rr t r� i '.. �• w � CITY�OtFARANC�IO CUG�AfMONGA j $'t��'r° 'IEPOW a /1 r l 7 DATE: August 8, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members,`-of the Planning Commissjon FROM; Brad Buller A City Planner BY: Steve Hayesi ;AssistantPlander SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION''FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13817 - MAJOR J'S..LTD. resldentla subdivision7anda ,.In review o single family_:lots 'on 18.01 acres of -land �In the: Very, Low Residential 0 strict '(less-tFan 2 dwelling wits per acra), 1 osated' north of will son,' east of- Hermosa, south of Hillside,- and`:west of Mayberry AVenue - APN:. 201-i7.1 11, 13 and 32. .. . ' I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tray 13377 was conditionally approved by x the Planning Con.nission`on. Dctaber 12, .19,88. On June- 27, 1990, the applicant, Major J's .Ltd:-, reguested,en, extension',of the Tentative Map in order to. allau them addittio*�1 itime to,. reccrd the final map. The 'State, Map Act; Section 664r�:6, allows foi up to., 36 months of,'extension. Extensions -nay be granted in �12, month increments. II, ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the;proposed .Time Extension, request an�has compared the,proposal with current developmen. criteria as outlined in.the Development Code. Based upon this 'review, staff. ,j has. determined that the project meets the basic standards-'for development in the Very Low Residential District; Therefore, -this project still remains consistent with all code requirements of,thL,_ City. III. FACTS FOR. FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make all the fol I owing fTn-di ngs in order to approve this application: a. There have been no significant. changes in the land use element of the General Plan or, Devel'opment Code,or. character . of the area in which th;s project is located that would cadre i. the approved project to 'become inconsistent .or non- conforming. f` b. The granting of an extension would not be detrimental to.the public health, safety,: or.welfare or material'1y`injurious to properties or improvements in the v I cinfty:; ' PLANNING COMMISSION, STkFF REPORT ' TT I3877-w MAJOR J'S LTD. AUGUST 8,,. 2990 Page 2 - 4 �•° IV`. RECOMENDATION 5t8ff, reco ends that. the .Planning;co mission % appro.Ke a'one (11. year Time"Extension for Tentative Trac;t,,-13977 ' through adoption of•the attached Resolution , R ctf I i Bra er: City P anner; f 9 J yy BB°SNmig 4: Attachments: Exhibit-U.9 Letter from Apolicant Exhibit "B" Site Utiliza, on"')ap Exhibit.%" Subdivisi'un Map Exh§bit Site P1.an',:i' Exhibit""E" CA,nceptual`Gradin"g P1an Exhibit "F" — .Equestriaa:`Overt$y +listrct F4ai►. EA bit`G" - Landscape--PJ4n„ Exhibit "N" — :Perimeter 1011 Exhibit 'T! m. Elevations Resot u�uion=lio,"88=209• " Resolution of. I yy h r; M r June 27, 1990 The city of Rancho Cucamonga community Development Department Planning Division P. O« Box 807 , Rancho Cucamonga,' Cl+ 91729 Attn.: Mr. Brad Buller City Planner r TENTATIVE TRACT 13877 BENT TREE COUNTRY ESTATES REQUEST. FOR TIME EXTENSION TO OBTAIN-FINAL-.MAP K Dear Mr. Buller, As you. know, MAJOR J,S LTD. received'Tentative Map approval. for Tract 13877 on october; 12, 1988. We have -made substantial progress toward a Final Map, in fact we are at the'point where we:can go before the City council for Final Hap approval. Unfortunately, as you;are -no doubt aware, the lending and .selling climate has changed'sig;ificantly in the, pose year or so, and we are not able to move forward at this time. With the current,letiding restrictions,and the kiow market for'luxury' homes,'we cannot'reasonablj forecast when.the situation wiTi-rupie 6 enough to allow us to move forward. All Grading Plans, Block Wall P,i.ans�, Building plans axe Sgreet, Sever, Water, and Storm Drainage, Improvement Planshave:b40%JV,6ifev0d and approved by planning, ginefting and 'Buildiiig• and-„Safety, but'we now; need to ask,for in extension`'to the time limit for achieving Final Hap on the property. If my understanding is torrect,-the Tentative .Map was approved for a two year period„Wand will'expire October 12, 1990 unless an extension is granted by tine Planning Commission. The personnel in the City Planning, Engineer ing,,and Building::& Safety divisions have worked,very hard with us and our, engineers ,and['architect and landscape architect to produce a project that we and the City •can.° be proud of, and we feel it is in everyones best interest.for' the city to grant a timeextension. We understand that'under the subdivision map Act, an extension ofc.up to three (3) years may, be granted by the City, one year at a tile, and we hereby, request an extension of the ? maximum times peraitted'by law. Please land your help and support so that we do'not lose everything we have worked so hard to achi®ve. sincerely, 4Rj General Manages i. MAJOR 3IS LTD.- CI or.,RAN CUCAMONGA TI'F_M: PLANNING'13IM10 Trr4E.. cast!c cr Fr�rw l i '-cc, EXHIBIT:Ilk' 5Ct1LE: ✓' k 16 ,w ago ;gyp << 1v— - 61 R/ff ee 9 Iowa ® N 13 wa ilk i N/LEAN � �. ° .. I✓ONYB N V RT iY CI. ITE TR 13?77 RAMC ETC O .."fid dIxG DIVISION EXHIBIT:..�' � SCALE; j 3. { -Iil T07f S�l LV rrO�! }fT1p�p� mAr6Fkxr evequY- RTLT�IST—.7tD tt9 t, _ Ry ... v� �k y •t J Vuu�aMr IL7fts - � - -0 i� •J� - y �Z ..ir•sw.•.w r..wJ.• s77 Rq; 9 G1 h �. '` .}ro•• xrfraz�r rfrar•�n rlr.Yri 'r may. .I d �. �1 ti wwatmn+,• u irr•rY.r �� 'w '. y• l O_ _� (f� ` ,ate• � �-�`•"" - 'rat R•ioc...1.. gl}yt. • Y�f P'f•4y 2}C��- :.y.7t•�Af•C•}..., d�L..Y :•I!Z' E I ILSON AVERME• ^ Io {p� t V SIMBag/ff cr F7l vst"D LATE Uwz e aqww a ve1e.wa •r++ee�viaiw r td} +w.•N.•s.er.v�...•w NORTH A7F 0ITEM: T 13377 NCH Ni TITLE;. °tft� PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT': mALE: S� Fw I � _ram —•a � � ;:�O R1 e a•�e t4 ..� ��� i .i } e 8 BEfCnmOG4 i2 '►pQ1rr8 �- �Y ITEM: 13 877 O CUCAMONGA TITLE:, �s 'Mr? PLANNING DIVISION , A-&, EX1H' IBrr:.a.' Lsc�L�: MERAf i AVENUE.' 61, 7 i KINL®CA"--gip -$ f 4 f � . 1p �, to 1�t �Qi i1 �—''��� pt6►+ f_!g ame+�w�saAir+n�en�araR► . 1 rs r�s®oaaarwu aA+aamrs� i , raw ZITY OF ITEM: 13?7� .;. IWNCHO CUCAMONGA . 'TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION / � ,L -; � 1 go \J � �' N � �+� ram• { Ell A bw 14 PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: 2-� SCALE:yi � r �� J 7,6 PZ. HERMOSA �=` AVENUE •_ ,+ate a�y �# •+�'+�. '�$F�"� . Ail ;f DV * ;� � �11:�•�'' �: � '"1.i'�Kw"t Oct ,}f�``.p 1 Y�� .� v�D•laso S "f ¢ 4 i� i Zru •( •� t �..� 0.5 op 44 1p PAD 62 �" L�--�,a--' aD.asm ti' �t`�• rr. tdST10p 0-0 PA AM 31 � ��. '�A �i Ate•�� ..r � • '- 13EE L7667►19f1.'JL. ..� �� se fANCHO GA I E PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE:. i t r..;f: ♦ ``ai _.. �4�=-�,• $,�r_, .-'''�tj: a •gym. � T y'.a {t$ 4 �., '+ <•.. J� •y i,� a 'ft. .rla 14 LU """ � 'a /. •. ` r+ 1371115 817AV-VI� CED •.' a �n: - — ^'.ass,tf to MA QI it Pik NORTH JAW �•. ._ _` a ''+•�.., _ �.? •'• .~ •�• t 1 M ' f PLANNING DIVISIONEXHIBIT: era! SCALE:r. I. ••«t•.r an �f . a5.� e.f• 1. +r � TL SEOTf?4 0.0. ' x � , 5 � •s.ron hi yt,� ? .,tea•.rYao tt�..ti XA 1 J•• •J rvr. dy r AMa'•tsAn>rt yy fA(� •ia�:'z@co P{It b �r.ICIOe I YY.yt � � dryPtpY' t�•.tsar � 'y "��y�,�-!� :� CTldl hi l J 1.r.... �� ��•.ew�. $ate�' •�r . 'r• .:ww,ara.ea ��YT.�i'T�^^Yai v SECT } 1fCTlQk J-J �`jj14 p' dioS`l3� a ,�! 3r �✓ ..a...A , g�0 e/�-7 am•r;� iG7 fATXYCOH CUCAMONGA IBEM KANNING.DWISION XTUBIT; a SCALE: . till ' MERMOSo-1 AVENUE '_. _ _'�._ ... ._,�_. ♦.ram•saavmuE c:.+tGaEc. �:. urn cs o.acw ui..nri...cw; i r � ! l �BFttaBLa' OEM sou"W. � �asewcsm mumc t� /\tBeMPI:dEiALtB0at19ft OF -71 CUCAMONGA, TITLE .2 ,PLANNING DIVISION n scAr.E: v r L COW, win- S \' `•"\. 12 NCHO CUCAMONGA MIA-. �I PIANNIN DIVISION {y�+p:��[p �.7}B*pp��•.AN4At16tT3,A.4 n # � n� u $ l O nab Z2 a p L 9 W F t' I a a NORTH T � � w ANC - . PLANNINGDIVISION EXHIBIT. 9� L . 51 i y 009Y 7 1018771M i. ti 3 C\ t w -•-- � r Nam' !tip �.. OR rl ITEM: ...(qT fA7XCqlxO , NGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION �I�I�IT; scALE: Ip� LJ. f t F9�Ei13 EOgAEBE E MAW-9®ATE BCEVATk?iaWA . ' GT=o 0v=SLOM m STM W=m ma ew- s CITY OF13�77 ITE . AN T-710_CVCA' MONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION SCAL�: f 4 5 r. 1 ��Yy`� !�:- cc E a� 1 r� ►,i _! } pi J��i i �y� ��,����� `��� ���'C 1�I i��( Af -o■ rr' tr� � r itur�a4i` t. fy a•t<'wX-�n Ih�-�1<tiu� r�ufpfirtul l�1 �rr �A._mt®Hn m! ��nlul_ ti... .....:a�.liimllilinllu�_ � ;�<,�����:- �j.., Gllfltif11111 � t 1 c`: '� -'; .�.. '�'`'� ���®. ��:.:Z.--ter.—•-� �, � � --*�'11111111111��'—_ —�� 4 R.� ill 3 gt YR nt ) rr• >t � � r. �•i AL �- —'- e":_r-ii•-_=d3-sue.— I.�=i?ss ? ,=3 .-}_'3'ss-s? {r•,_.. ` ---'-'•--a x: r�—"3x'-'�a:_-� , �,.�- 3=pE Lz�3r"_sa-i::_ 3 ,::a,'-3' - :::s+1=`Y__..::L•s:_�:=_�3i, m-s—_a:ss.-=sa:=s:s1�-:.:av::_:_.. _ _ _ - _---______ sa___a:�- —.33ss_ - _ ii•a Ss.s._— �x�. ..c Tr- __''•sue._ __ :ai. _ "_-_=3 ..._ s'_•.'_.•.._ _.______xxxxxx_._______.._.______...i•.x:=.�.:--:xsai__...:s.:assrsz� �=-i=�=_�=:r.::ss?3;?- ;�I'r'3 3'?a33S�73 ?ar , �jii"i+-j ?jj3. .:.3.a �-i3�3i 3 ai�3a_?ia'ii�133ia i iI.3iIs-T r3ii3+3� '=._.=_s -'Iani-:='ai Will 1 �r 77 .,,tS.v. .s RL MIN, `..'�x..r:—fir' ^•`,`+�_ n�•-- PS �a�'a k t 3, �t ®® r :s�I a'X'+�s.4� i-an _,� aC• ♦ r l., A a 1a� ,+�,yll�� s•1f;} ��- ,Itmeag+lhul+1UfiliiftagY '? � ,, t4�.. �9t n14r plffyllt� d�1ya�111illllllllllttl IUIOU[IITIIIIf�IIUr"' �' , � •4 "T �4 If �'-I..a.ia_3.i- I 3 li Yl } r v 1` si! i P ., .sxx Mg ;HE.aa=sriraa _ -_—�•�_'r3ti'.Y_:a::drw---.- -'.�'�x`_i:f�>_ '=LairyE��'i3=j�' _ ■ .::_ - b t�.. Cat `� �i llzi!a]7%^3�i *•i. i _'__ z�'r^!a;?Iiiie a- _c a-mac __ ac•xacx_x—•_r_ .=%ii?iii:�::_.M.:r:�x:i-.:air:=.':4ir=e.'__': x �' r v., � °�la)�� rn) •� 'Y-11L�Gti� ,il � ` •> _ '�f.C,.2` I T' 1 �, —.z-�'._y.Tj• z t LLL�,�r �"'J . min t11111 In llnMNXilit °1'v K` "^tt. Fyr "S`,�. aSy -ti+'.ii Y }r Y"}3� a r a� "Y^ r• 70;S7R4..i]17i avrori"' «OR �ry � r Z Uavavtom WAR I.c: - 4„ — r`z . € e c eFe—lei- r II iZ..' aese tteaanor n..1•e 'CITY OF P I riING DIVISION: EXHIBIT: A SCALE: .., ���``�`''^�"'.-•'�'� ... nw�-a—I�ril ,. — , f�.i it :a{ CkI A' ■� «ai,�� r � _i ��'�L ��`+�„t T.rr � `t, rt tit lut ;�• �el+'1 I II��yllMnl- � � 6�1Y1 aIT 'r �.aWl 3CAt0�OL(,��.A1MM�?^� LA �`{{`'' '"'.�... k AINf� ���'� nunoliunnuum n klnii IU..•u urn nnn` c.pnx_nninnnmu nf03'r �t li}!L'�,u111urninmtun � rr■■[y k I ._.-. = d'"�'�- •_,�;,_ .. __ -' �,, ems. .a i i it imij RAlgT 6YB.!(tViftOA PUN}.. 41(f sE•= S - jai iBIPiAIR 6tR11ltgArca�)-q: CITY OF ITEM: -7 13?77 RANCHO CUIC A ONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVI$,ION ExNIBIT-. r SCALE:• '' 6 MRt`44-t' r - "tea i tt •�Sd"�\���1. �' r ` ^p s a7sz.0 a • P(� }I 7 ,+ r � .i'.'j .,71h� 'e +R�,.-�+}ti � �� �' 4+ - Illliiilti At111Lt16 �� '�� 4plp} * rtra►€r p /v�_ c i ii 1 ri.11bY�, n Ilk awn�x _ Ti tr ,tt$',nnp• —,,. ��l d&Ctll'� i R ■1 n ppi ii iw . �'��tnnrc/• Inunpia unm�, Inn Y�. mnnunnu a xwuW -- ;�- .' nnuualulltlel{4 i TURN WK sti fir. i h^ 2 a 3 tipPIP'! _ '. _i�-1— =s� `==I'i��� m HI I ?� __3 3' r_ i--"-_ ' L 3 T�s 3Et: :__ :_ •_._•__•--._ :-:333a.5�:rS�a-ai�3�i''i•?G2_:. t �� ,,� pfjtlluwmuiU ifi .� �'a.'_,._.'—•L'`"+ 1�, 1, s/ is � „•-,i 5�, r z... l,, n a.,i^. -1111ilflln � Ill II cl ,r 1� L � TI �11 F `�T�..» ■ I i i�' a y .y�'S"d' -'-!i,i,'s L ��IUtIf11WIU11IIIIIINi �-�Rom-"pfryr�w� il ![,_•S-t I UII �;k i%11 1 r� -' g4 air:' ils ix?H •r'-- i1. a _ t Of 7 9 fflo i to s,9 � —i�•_"'3�—__�'�:i::�_•e-_"_ ..,:� ia�y ;a�F i.. E.,-....�__ av_s__.=a_____ E„ac�-i3i:: r�::.z='_2'S F� {:"i:E_�3 Ei:' `•_ �a,�:_ 9 ��•=ii yT icii':iiis:-",i''�iic_ - 3i —- �'.i3i,5i . .y•-��'i=3=ig��.3i.a.—'�' - —_fir_,`_=<�?i35i��?�.cs5'via_ _ ,tic (4 all '',... 2�.'• tEN r A(tl eif- ;: Fi a,,,r lci e. '41 +� 'r-^t4 .4a■.+:. at t ®s +t�`'k59 r I 7M� ,� ���� r—_®"_�`,�. .KY t�kgPTl +z+ j■ � 3 I :e- Rs; ,�. s UM ®� Yi{� 1a� ®< c �I �A� t 9 1� r ..nr• �=�) f s:�. ..s r�� �'v.#'S?xUM1 ""'ti +�II�,Pi+�itn nm �nul' .'c���c.._ nuniilG ••1 �f Ii?. - ■�,`G.r�, �?ate a.� - a.r ��� dn:al w,. 11 r.. n ,e 1 HipjR3 �-� -' mii N. _11?31r=_a[ __ - _- ~ MAP- iai=— _-•: -�Ea,f:4 _ �an�-r -;s' a= _; s a:i.Z- - - 3i :�i c3., '*,.F n, O' 4 - i 33u3��=_i�%i3i31 .a�z-3 a___-.� '•. cczia;:czz::z??%a-'_=_. _ TM s•�trw r'��w` __ _ 55 3 Y-s z� _ t2> � ` �1 " --►� s'�� 977 _ nmmn Y� �- dzt �3�1tt �d1I1 �iyi — ,11� nnnn�yY►dr� y xF � ",..� t A'" t �n *•,::� ,. �+ra _ — Al F1i-; 33 'qr tqS 1 �7S J } Yqt Mqr Y.d Al NO�i33i2i i i �rw of �� Rai qin. w'iM+Yi t IERM .';w � .•._— :.aa:: ?e ..MENNENsa:•r--,_,_tee.. 53' -- --- MOM NIN scc - }' - i'=is-_- _ i � sec.- a= _.;�-_.: =r-as )i • LYlw,uy� Hif .r'-�-i33S33e��-� a .-a-e3-a_.s sseE-- s,,, '_c•__ :}-a _%_'— '_--_n"c� J i-ay---:c•� =z='ice?l=A -r_-- x3c-- __.__..ram-a-:_—esz._eee. T J I (� p _ �as;• c ^�=°=— 'h ..vx A N—" t� t i �� �,.��'�_. -� � a ;����� .� ��c,��� "�r-r'v�.x,� �,-�' `� f«.'�' n Onm�aa�n u�n•��,��„�„iy� " , �\� •.l'� .�--,.,;r'"`�e—�,.f .«:ice-, � : t 'E�33337 -�.pq.#3�Yi-3i3ix_ .,y•-'f '���33���,l��3��i i���y�19'3��� 3� 1 i �_ yr• '=.E:�� .i_i�c:. -i:a�_r—:_:Esc_ a•=�. �'"^'""T'•��y��"?` t ERR . Y i `r{ RESORUTION NO. , 85-209 R RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AO. 13877, AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, LOCATED NORTH .OF WILSON 'EAST OF HERMOSA, SOUTH OF HILLSIDE, AND WEST OF MAYBERRY IN f THE VERY LOW RESIDENT AL - APNt 201-111-6. 11, 13, -and 33. A. Recitals. (i) Johnson has filed ate application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13877 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter �^ in this Resolutirin, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to az "the application`, ;. $ ` On the 12th of October,,1988,. the Planning Commission of the � City of Rancho, Cucamonga conducted a -duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (ii ) All iegai prerequisites to thy. adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. moll, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and �resolvr�' by the Planning Commission of the City,of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specificeTlY`finds,that All of the facts in t set forth in Recitals, Part A, of trhit 'Resol'ution are true and correct,` 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on 9ctober 12; 1988, including written and oral titaff reports, together With ,public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) The application applies is property "located north of Wilson Avenue, south of Hillside Road,, east .oi­�Hermosa Avenue and, west of Mayberry with a street frontage of approximately 329.63 feet 'on 'Hermosa Avenue, 676.67' feet�on Mayberey,Avenue and 662.72 feet on Hillside Road and is presently unimproved; and (b), The properties north,:south,`east, and west -subject site are zoned V+:ry Loan Residential: Density (less thin 2 dw acre); and ellirtg,;units 'per (c) The applicant has filed an accompanying Tree Removal pewit for the,proposed removal of six (61' windrows from.the subjecs property based upon-arp'oricat survey>and ,ge°tiding impacts;; and PLANNING COMFiISSI RESOLD ION NO. 88-20 TT 13877 - Johnsort October 12, 1988 Page 2' (d) The proposed subdivision design has a minimum and average lot ,ices of 20,000 and 22531 square feet, respectively, which are consistent with,,the requirements for the district 7n which it is located, and (e) The proposed subdivision design and accompanying raps have been reviewed by the°,,Trading, Technical`,. Trails Advisory' a;jd Design Review Committees and approved subject to conditions contained within ' ;his Resolution. 3. Based upon .he substantial evidence presented.to this Commission curing the above-referenced public hearing and upon tie specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. (a) That tentative" tract is cansistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the ,General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans;-and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and. , (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidab injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat;; and (e) The tentative tract �is not likely U.-cause serious ;public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public .apt large, now of record,.,;,for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision a. This Commission, hereby finds and certifies that the project :has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of'19I0 and, further, this Commission hereby issues FA Negative Decl arati o'{. S. Based upon the findings and-conclusions set forth in paragraph 10 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application .subject to each and every condition set forth below ;and in, the attached .Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.. - 1, PLANNING COMIMI IMLUTION NO. 88-209 TT I877 - Jehnsonf, tr October 12, 1.988 Page 3 Tentative Tract , 1. All slopes about the tank area that are steeper than 2:1 and that lie on this property require remedial work to,make ;ttieet 2 ), or, flatter. Thfs may require. redesign- of tithe trail and shall require approval of the Trails Advisory Committee, ;the City planner and Cucamonga County Water Vstrict -prior to .recordation of the final' map_or issuance of any permits. 2. The appiicant,shall obtain approval of the property, owner nest of the Object site to remove any off-.site windrows or rocks Which occur on the adjacen},site prior to recordation of the final,map, 3. The Aitd Lams Basin, 'located to the South'ofthe site shall 6e excavated to.provide sufficient storm 11water retention to off-set the increased runoff 'generated,by the development. 4, Overhead' Utilities: a. Hillside Road - -An in-lies., fee as contribution to the, future undergrounding' of the existing overhead utilities (t:!scommunication and electrical) on. the opposite side ofi Hillside Road shall be paid to the City prior to ,-`.oroval` of the FinAl Map. The fee shall be one-halt the City adapted ;unit amount tiE�;i, the length from the center of Maybeery Avenue to the west i1rojOactr boundary. b. Hermosa Avenue - The:` existing ovei Lead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) M. project side of Hermosa Avenue shall be-"`undergroeladed along .the entire project frontage 4extending to the first pole offsite (north, and south'), prior to .Public improvement, acceptance Qr occupancy, whichever occ;:rs first. Tha developer may request .a, reimbursement agreement to 'recover one,half the City .adopted ,cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelop4444) as it occurs on, the,opposite side of the street. 5. The street i rovements on the west side of'M�berry Avenue shall be et ended to ' include the property owned by Cucamonga County Hater District €APN: 20l-I11-31). 6. Developer shall construct an inlet structure to the Alta Loma:.Ba$ on ,f{ermosa ;Avenue .to ,the satisfaction of thQ , City Engineer. f` .�B7 PLANNING COMMISSIr OE'OLUT.IU NO. U-205 TT 13877 - lohnsot October 12, 1988 Page 4 AM 7. %:weloper shall construct a storm drain inlet strucfiure on the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue, and Wilson `Avenue with the storm drain extending and daylighting south of the Intersection. 8. Items ff,-qd #7 shall receive credit towards thv, storm drain fees as part of the Matter Plan of Storm Brains. 9. The street improvements including sidewalks on the east side of Hermosa Avenue shall be extended southerly to include the curb return on the northeast corner' f lsermosa Avenue' and Wilson Ave►;ve. Ti developer may request a re.imbursment agreement ,'or the portion south of the tract boundary from the adjaceNt property upon its devel,opmant. 10, An on-site storm drain system. L--y be required depending upon the results of the Final. QtVaage Report as determined by the City Enginev. Design Review 1. Windrow replacement planting shall--be provided along Hillside Road, Hermosa Avenue a,ld ftberry consistent with the planting requirem-4nts of the Gity's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 276. Replacement planting shall be shown an 1p the final landscape and irrigation plan. 2.' The exact trunk location oar the trees located on the lower, northerly boundary rha-11, be plotted an the grading plan. Those which do. not -Gastruct the 'local equestrian trail shall be preserved. A revised Tree. Removal Permit application may be necessary. The exact determination shall be made prior to issuance of any permits. 3. The applicant shall follow the recommendation's contained in the arborist report in order to preserve the six trees located on lot 2. The preservation methods relocation shall be indicated on the grading plan prinr 'to issuance of Permits. r � 4. Provide a landscape. easement adjacent to the wall- on Hamasa Avenue. 5. The mall height along Hillside Road shall be 5 feet from highest'finished grfie. 0Provide additional detailing to the periveter wall at the trail entrances. Details shall be provideLon. the final, landscape and irrigation plans. { PLANNING COMMISSIc, 'ESOLU'TIoN kO., •8a-209 ? 11 13877 - Johnson �• - October 12, i988 - Page 5 r ' i 7. An actual fired brick veneer shall be used rather. than a - stucco brick veneer. 8. I'4 design of the monument sign on Hillside Road sha11- be similar -to the design of the Ci.ty's entry monumentation signage.. In-'"addition. the ,•brick, banding sNa4l d be eliminated -from the base .and the monument incorporated as part of the perimeter'. ;? ;design, 9. 'Provide fast-growir+J.;evergreen` vines' and irrigation to screen the retaining Mall on the east side. of the trail on 1.0ts 21-23.__ 10. Native ,fieldstone should be used on the decorative perimeter Wall,. 11. On lot 9,the hou. : shall' be.oriented,with thp' front Setback} measured frow thA s6utherly4.propw ty ?ine, uniess,the east property lire .°rs des ;gnated as .the' fmnt lot line on the tract map. 6. The Secretary to this Co=ission shall certify, to the adoption " of this Resolution., APPROYFO AWD ADOPTED THIS12TH DAY OF XCTOBER.i 1096. PLANNING �_ .'`SSION.OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC<A Zane a, I- airmen ATTEST: r U VecreSoy I. ad Buller, Secretary :of the Planning`Coi nissioh of the City .of Rancho _ Cucamonga, da hereby certlffy .that the soregoind Resolution�sias, duly and reguinrly introduced, passed, ;and adopted by the Pi nning'Commission of"the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular eting of the Planning Commission field on the''12th day of October, 1988,,by the ,following vote-to-oa fi: AYES: COMMSSION'ERS; BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA,'EM ICK, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOW C. ABSENT: CQMalISSTOMERS: MCNIEL, TOSTQY r moo'{•, S�NwO�u2' .a e�` �c '�4' � �'a•pW! a ���« �•_M�+� ��sy yYy LCCW 4�� r`tl R �"� a a.�a� N y'"' OG L Ba ,\ all +YiC a,C YY L,G Gyp qY '.� .0 9Gy0Y 4 0 0 G®®lar� V. 01rCq 9.� Cj'C lCtl O�tl R= •ya' Ovq�d e4i ®v n1Ny��Y >Olxj nV�de � Vag N. a V � L� .� a.N � Aki OY VY Cb wGii t'a[yapG'� 'mod V 24GQ{ VO.O vpu ZISy N.M.,.:'��+ Vg V9CN pap CrG�pp a S66 _ 1"t V c!y V�rp CQy.�r O G G'1{..6—p `a�:.g V:OF .YyY9 si �T� 4o. Cpx � O.CbpyC� r �.t3: yG�.sLO b«0 y�YpO ''Ig.cV N:Y' t•^'gp-.of .W. Y^pH id:LN a L'fi 4•V IC�C O. s >0.f •jC WW'�CCe.+,v; o'�-�jx�t �, 3� ^g �. a s,y cc a a 'C U Y 7T�tl L Gay,O. O C c N ] .0 O p G C N�G(.O Nu.1O V 14 G.••�j NO -.-• N ®O $ QO LQ: C. N.'•®Y _ 4!^YG '6 V YVd 4 q Y L VIOi,,Ce� aLY4.^w CLL MV a-" o6•.. Y tiS H�PiY � qY�. NIL snN ^b.5jywy 5 O y C-'G V,NL G;f, 99��6ppO Y� 9 V L a 8 Cepp }t. ��qq pC x p� l y Y CCCC il°• �ayL LLV N.. 04�1wN �.d Gy�4�r Mp I� ^I•�CY.� 1. prJLo, �E ,P�`os�m wL geay �aa� aGC+ `N sNGyvc��¢ HVy�bM ^:�NpV tlC .p.� sCh,OVOCx.✓�i�•�ViN M d a ,� _ Y, saQ O'. HC G O `.tiv Vg{V���•.Q v�LF�pG. GI ssNy�C,�G• gp�CpCb NN ss41 ��{bi•7aC.A'M�4 aw: fF qG�M YY..V� V N�� Y '1 x Aga �.;�' �.r".�,�•tl°�D��p�:�-�' ' W COO V Z ^ACV {•ACV®G�� S LM Y QaV', T q.0 Nv. 6A.dY i C.p 9 3 � � V.Yj p µ � ��•O w..0�V^dp 6'b tz na V�YN,e�,x�yGoy 1., C V �• pia `` gg® pu Y^G l Y G� L y N O^V O yq■Y-.Q O^ �: N V Yp�-�'a C, �4^11L ` yyq 4 Y:.��uyd yp 7-7 p1� L••Y�l. d oor � Nq a� „.popMy a V.yV VCY•� OeO+RY VLLa� YL���. d V •m d +�^ n �.®YY OC OTC tl• � � •pw OyO c c N O i -$ ^Ix y C Y q C 0 d S IVY. ^ia pC'aL WL^ �Lor rs n«i�^ r¢c0 _t'N.. i�ra a ^q4+0 ✓ 'b �i ♦. O •�� 1 p L p�7�C ,r L S �un.��® =.,•p•`v� Qr ��C•C.N�Ntc� d�e.0 L�^ �°Ss ty• cp 'ypp® C�n O• YNCY uPM O V aO.+V YM a^.Y�yL[ N ^O QO. �:6 p p^N a gYC C NY p ^O Y .qC� A9 +� ce: .pY, �+'sia a„•u, A„ � C V C r� �L" •" • o g' o`�Q �aeaa�v2v =u$�Yaa m$� `2' Caa =a AL.�OI LC • ^•pq� • w LL + eg• �_ � 'L'{Qgog�/�Oy�Lj Rap�« `yyn]44]���gye a�� c7 a•a'uc cai as�,yst9 •c.cw�•, uyy pYQ� N Y O 6 C Y •C u O C y 9 w9� „ y aNT.,„^.~O V p— a N y O a■ •-01 to]p 4 N C p N O. C a l L C Ol L i i MC'w y V a C C �. t•7« V o IE as v e „ 8'ae "oea � .. +.. • � : N • C�^iw yL� + CL- V i• O Y O Vd.V CN CY C.: C� • d i La"Y 01 �LOCp YL PV'.LA GY C O.0�v^�• VMr�.. a ly V. GO p INS�$ 92 r.. .o'i.8 ouDia sw ygLL �`Yj ' ®® YY�^ 11:I� L•� 9L1LGpp��. �YLOY=Y. _V V:L _g1 CC^V Q tl.N6Y �MYN ,V��wNL� �i.�YLei- C aLV N: Yy� - Ww^� C a60�® NG® A:_ C C p p a C w•6 O d i e� y fJ Lc •p 6 Y G� � YyL^ � L �fi yC. V aA. 0$0o awW ^ 1����d. b•• ou�;L� p •a)C.L i+yNN: V Cd C^rr 4�4y CY M{^/�9qC ~O IJ�O a e• A OI a.. qr` C y ~MY� 90 w`;OyO �4II 9 w•w• aSa^a g _ :�D �« PpV y CO„b `•.,.mod LY �Ys.. Nd3��•.'. �A y^d �ar��1 •' �••�(C6'p y� C,^C ic C p.• 5 j.4 VIZ is Y 6 CS.2��,, L= Z EN" ya+w�V Cry •y$ a+'p pY�.-J. N�Cya'�,:..n'Vy e�Epo«. LK e1 y.p5 a D=,wp Sw bi�p« L$•• 00 C Y.V'1Q YL�LLy Cp an _ pVf� C9 WxMRp�®gw H' yy qp yy 'Q; q'Miw R �YyQ @ puyO Qlp OIC w: dwt �sYO• L$6. ic .V A=®F'�L� C C r^ +fi N., ^=.22 ice,. MN N{Ly •6.••Z.ra( C „'...I �AS�V»»y �V .. `C .-C � ;..aClOOy�. CNriCY Viffi C�tAy SyY._ �_-fir F§yi y 9J ay$ae � V V�d M H`pG 6 a'Cu�lp4sy�Cc _ pG • �� aCL � `,® Y _• C V V 9, V O IT C +V C V y.V M C mi�M b•N C C Y O w. C s'a C i e- p {t om• -Umrys L ae 12 v.�. Y� o aN� dL�g" 'ci a...V'�a,oe►�y`i O:y�cias' V$'a'd•°°p' "!►L.15 5.3 'v >I �O ® p i 04 - mil, , 4w� aavu�. :aL C wGLLYe-' OO N= :CO ii ". OC ,cY 00001�.M1Yl9a. "C'�CF C LtLid .. �CVL IIO '� ^L -OGO COO Y�L•C^a�O. g'�•+r O CC 33 a � N. vav JO C� y ANY. V .rC6. 4�'•' G � d.. yNG 0 � 1 V Oe •a0i� 4�y^9.�w gN�(pY. �$ y C q O Wes' L. G „ � 3 +•�Y i Wdls•q 0a WS Y OY �-. O �~ y yY �V Y.� 4L� 0Y.y+91 CY •�� II -NNA. rViV A N Ly C r C IN ap, ^ V Vw O L�� :p Cldt� fY.yyy�y �VtN �S �G S064N�v�NA 9N3'ON T. dye ® NyCL VYP L..y' OEM pwC. aNNV Sb 4HG..tNG �= Y'C:. Q G� N Ye^c11� Oq �N9 :�~ YY 1r'r C.Ot�i V,y�t.. q Y QpLNY 'r • �'O L L` Y L W p Y.,0 N O O�N �y�r-' T��N C b �d y OVA agt o� 4 � II ur w'. Oy II� rQ�yu±� II aY LN O.^ L �:N py�C:LN p7 N db�I id Z N p IIN.. ..NSaLi NL a0 O 6 �C p��yII9LwG.. CM p:.n �O V�yg VyC ~,�S_C tl1: NtiNoSo OY 'e{��tLy�KpN O..p'YN�G 6r�`•t Sy' L9 qyV .O'aQ0YVf�Yi. NBC ` n;i14� IN.LO N9 Wy pspYMG ALV�N :. G 4 s'•ps, T7CC ' dJ q`» wt.0 Nq L�.� ry C.r W��ej.. L 4NVby�N�SGy �=:4��Y. F)v ^ C`aw �N�yiaL'�NaLL �VnYtu aLW- :.i � �VL•1 rp N:LNV is- NgN_yR. CCe � rYNeq.. ,py�ayw4 dG CEO{ L Ls�TN�1`. ~O.Oy �~ ►C C>' _ O LV L ^NY �LGNpi-.dC^NG' ��ts`p �tM gqV.yN �L4 • 'SN iC. O�m p6s 4�9NMYe OII rCIT ~Y��LA V Lr 9-LppLLe. �a'�'oa. YO.d i�d _CNV Cs L -NY6 q.9 G1 Y{dL��L...p C'O. MLA' G ^y yCgy� LC'LGL B.wdlC Qa. _Y Mw M�yM P•rOAA�W C�Y�y<A ¢C.µtt4 �C dLCCw� Vf.w. 4N C'Nr• iC M. 8M0 pNS tN Y•�^tTs�MM OV 4ie..pG R.Y 4..Oq 6N. . aGIL L� G9 w= spy L•bO a... G Yq:N q'wM Op i Y p`p� $CG9 ®Y.•r. C 6 p w Na K_ev^ ii D N= w 0 Y,p6 y 5..1 L 4 a ilk, •�a� a$$ Yo pcepp ,,fig f'x y. vp L: p=�i 't_M G�.5 •�N.Y �YJ$ RYA q^' ^ �� `�i_am a N ..q U '4 �44 ap :lTw c r� W t O� GS CyY� If ql,.M V 9 Y Cw.tt M.y ti �O ���� -gat r,.N..0 all 5 N.w .�sr p '$C E. e. _e N Y efM ":�yoeop opaN® ,.. .g. �Nd..w.i ` o �1� V = ,O•ri'oo g0 rya F a+$aov 'm^« v: v'yw.a V .a• nya .Y. " dNr, wd w �,v. .a t'm r- a$4c Y41 :. pY c Lap`O .aQ a�y M YIt M:YyV e... q�`q=Y S :OFNL•G"G�'H L 9dy t'^NLS tir Y.r� N8b 4 d� 5 .ia .D :..Nt�i y SOlp BItB.� 4;1y �ya.G^ N �'p C A q :e M V= C 4 s u a M x�ppt a NB C� Mco'*Y P� ^� Y �Q~:9C O • W �Y~ Vi ^ sM 6 it OML �� wpYs y�6V I .. TT II OpM 0' CbpO�CNq VV pp +� 6.a�• ul C.W !� Y W. L a C G`i y. L �! a aD yy4: p YO�p ®4� ~ CY N•V"c^V$e p G^ �pyp• /STda NVLylNY N4tl ',!'!' at�a YF �'d. ^y`^ ^�� 4l.S�iL ^y L Y1':C 61. aia w� NL Ydu�.•QL 1� a'.rs N.o a9�.e�i �a c'vN aut ;¢a �onr.a 'rst G ,a tAi� W�lori,,�'$dw •` M- S `.La 4yy_^OY CCAp OIL.Q 01^ 4p LYC 4 p� �y.a a• :.� . � 90q. N^.Cq �3iW O O q y W u d gqg.L a,V a QtiC O Z C^ u l Q& {�g�..yyyyy„yC��Y y■y■yyC `fl QQ i.iCCC4 1 `25� q 4�-qC� q��O.Y O p: yy 9p. � 1`C G YC M'W l•,., �O ��I ►.per oS{�9"Z p� 54i1 «B'oe w,QO y p�:Q�" ltl_M H Y6V4 ~tlOb W:'fxlY N CB q C t C � q 0 y 3 Q a 1 y q ^L. 4 aH..4 C4�Y0 1^ L$. q:� T .ppyy.:.0E .-a YC6 26.Cg ME ..aN '�c,$ �ceOo eY. iuo:�' C'o�.a� �a.c�4 a7: ILA C.�.O �4.L M111yIIICy Y^O I3 1Q�L Y� y.. ��Cypi �Os �f OVYP.� V`p IT 9e y �py(q�MV �4c ^ a EC Cy MY^OI ^CC. qq.V Oq.®yY _ 9 GM C L yp1 ! pp Y�PIC `S V YCtlI� OYact y '6 y W eoo a owc�rtlCe ��4� �z_cw� :fir gu. GpA �p4'tY/O� qy�q/� OOq 'mpV.« 41.E}SS��44L�yNj Y�i p.oL ZC A C 1 yL;SV N G�•�. 1.2. � °V.CB aC. LLV:.O.aY GAGOY YDyy'L�C�ppO yN� L YpppY y'60 p�y a�y+a.YSyy /�1.�a-0.Hq L. C Y^I�gQ9 �4:0.� 'iq L'1`N if!�: ,' �4/W�V. 6.� bN 1.w'4Wp N L > ^ W LO C p q O r S O/ GC4e M u Y ^Y Le y■ •0. L p q 0 V Y '.�V 'q'n= : 'O1'`' VQ.xL V M^ 61-.yNN O V��1 a a^_{� L a} � O� ara : p®YC C.O ^1LCC y� V4q ZZ {yL� CpeNd i^ >Ge p VM _N Ap'q C y q ~+O C CU 6 C n 0 YV; - Cy _C V C 6 v O� iN CM 1 O y �CC � � $ V.:Y • �3 9�0� oY Y�Y �~ �dN dWyAa M "d V 2,[ V V q'..N q .Yy _� •YC a'- a c y 4 y 4 a T m W o C p �y Ay N � N Lw0 N V LqC O .S�&Q IX i ^_p'6•: NN. E�Y .0 V L a �"5 z zz q SPy>.�L `ug �Ycaeu C G VMY Q�V.4 a'C $MS+M ¢;. au 3 N 4.§q a sNao+l o� gsg O NET gNY�' 1` vGda'L 'O '. ^ Y.NO +aA Q BCA 9y1 LB L.N� �Lp wG{o� yd. Y0.1b YL `tf C�4.YC q ` M .� My.^ 64 �C �I 'LLI��'N4O■a;�YO!.WSC Na N N Mi0 V�:qq S q 66to } � iwo L 4. C YQ1h 0V Coz,FVS.OM 4�� 'OVMPNNN. Is W' t , D C G y bi g iq® Y w gNY3� V.NSSSSSY C'oO YQ�.. - M� A Y b �� C9'nG v p■''gV aggq0 y L Cr A 4.. 4 C� b .V.sng a Ya o p c '4 NOS 6LIO■LC� N 4t Y 0 W� NLNY 4 L yC;O'� � tl ,..�rrS� g■ OF ZZ ^BOOO���,c'�...0 .q V Y p A Y A , a 9!-Y YO•D :I �M.^tl' A -d Aid a W�p O.Vl cc4 o ev C o.2 ppN 4 a F N Y Y Y Y, O L ' Y p,.¢L =Qg. al WL� 9� LC N Y�IiAV 40',4 VCi Ol�i:: Cl i .N.AAyyp aO Y ENVY 2�^..C99M9 VS:- p C10w.W'.G♦ �,N i.OIV YM YOy�j p LC.:. Y at Ca OCR C LNP On COGS Ed 'was .A YYCOWC 4Ni,b0 aaY�Y lO.�WZz pyLV yrOj qOY A L LQ `3 `qe C we ;a �w G N r � Too ,7.:2 C7 7 fC Y M Cm 4®ma®yy CC �Y �Cy OV ryp 9" gj LcdYO Y�sV� N:�E'o CFUyO® �.` ` C ® w�Q yW�. Y9.wpw DO U 3E 114=iS �O p� 4C N�O1 V Caf�0Qg1 c ayw'y t L y �0 �aa s+ V "I Q+ L O '.O yap Y o—m a wv'p� fg) nW,0q�'b\ p�eY. i�NO t➢:OM$L ♦I by CS Y 01 Ly Cw. 40 �� i "r3 aNa $' :Nyab pO V^4 � Y� 9®� O p yL N:I:,yV � ■}�Op -.,-OIV s_ p gC7yb atl M .'� a-21 �' C.*OY O' 'Q-:bC em NCp N� ZL pw L a$ � d:Oa O10 Qa w:� VmT ® C � ��.0 O Mbr 4c'4ay^ Q 4 NY cSif 6`NO yD AV_Y fiO OCprO YW V OfY .. \�1LC IAY �b.i O�pp YY M i� � OIW �O pYM y M Y'4us ay C C Y S bCL Y O Xy _ a O VV p 4'O T N O M w G rgp 4tl '0.9 4.r 9 M 4 L CJe oY .�-tl V :-a N Y.V.Ifs K La y O O O- A` Y ww3 -.wuu' $.n ciava a5' s�n�'e"u, lV .Ff a' Y1 1Q /���/�, tlOO yL� OL': •Se � 4 `'=OOL � Y Y � O a, «O C N a WNeeeyg��". /w c g CL� CEO d C.... a• '' aO ^ Cif tldA .�4 V ^ 9IL 6�'N. P. A N� L G...L ^'O :W �9N.� ; 'Y Q/= NV Gi3o N L ��. ;Nw ^` Y a<< wv. g C amp^ O d C C '�V ...�b V�dy Y Y Q y q O p^ s 9 G Y C d J L C VLL C 1� W 7 9 N Y VQY... N� d yyc 'M �.OU E. C. V �$ u®® 4 ANC LL ACC �_ M� :C y�vtl. L LI gC. cio �s �Yu ^'El ycgs L Aa v Ny d &a Gdi 9'•' q` ^C O yL� Y D Y tl tl. L �Y uQ.. V�' f O p d �yNA L 61fY' 0 3 1 :..CMN pCpL CL yy LSL 1," A. Y6Y Y, 9 �C� YAB ^Y G. -Fi V r Y aeo �'tl Qo.uY �, Iso • ;� aw mevy�e���C�N�{l wx ro`� ��.; g ,Y.^. e�3 �o• _� N^'^ eN ';9^W d.0 •^" Yq OM.�.C �iJ i�i Vim. VCO bt^ �yy C.61LY �lY LNLI 'N:W .52 YG qC.'. $ +.'. yy� .. �ye QyN/ -Laim -1 L Y tl tl L V O V tl ^A N 9 V�Y`V gl ^ G wdL aL�rJ cu a-9 W.L+:`t'$ ^� I�PIYW 60N ® Of .fin A yy 'y _90 Ytl. N�Otl OY� V O 1 Y A r C I y ^tl C O H C V(• 9W O d s Yp` Y y� SS u w,-o .O.e�, t" YO p a M ^ op i tll t N®� tlO `•Ll V ^rl YCN �o a{ My OIO� L L+ ' Lg6 VA �J 0Y. 1N ^A'O. 9NWp GC' 6q•. {Gl C tl 4 0 2F.M.S. G tl tl 42 yid >> spy Ygg` M g gaYiN —1L� QyC��Y L .N. a ggc R vide '��Ooi M �L q"yu b.: �':�C... v�cu yam•-o^� Cp -, it 2 Y a tgga C1` .Ci 91 9`'•'Y C Wr ^$e Y�lq'.dy a`4'Y 'AN AO O` - CA ` p C�4 Y YL NN NV� Nc O q p G 9L'��. 01 ��L 9+ Cyp Ne C ` L ~ 2 Nw� Cq ~AiO p0�r�► N M ,o r '6 9p 6O Y`. �YyO g� u L� Ly q^ �^� C N C "r _�� y y� IsYi yfJ.t V.:{Ly�Lf•' Lr V, �NOV O co C N = L1I� ."^..¢lg a r V C t 0 N`Y CQ WS` f.19 .11L l�i �►.. ` NL! Vl 0itl 9^ 6.g18. ^ ( W ^ m a v N•` �; G =�'Y a uC m": r. v)c_ QWQ^Y e o 0 _® ML np.e a a L O r' Y � V^N �V G — O«•yg VOL aVi�y O.0 I —pp M fVe C Iv.SGW O O �C A�wp rCp ` yH� 3 4 Le L p UizN Y L dOw C YL �qpt�� VV q�v V« 1Csy awi L Co f uYi P 4S.w V O p f.$ u v« �.T yyyy L .c pp yie yp'9 V L«Yr ` � �• «•dN J�.d y0 Ip,p .C LY 5 i i m a 4 41 G 4 L qq GGGG qq G Y � B�VN «C`� O : VVC _v L^ 9�• =„�j +yam 4L CY COCLfp g W ~ sayg V k! 90Iz �,O Ndi «mid Li dVTg + 80• ®p.Y«j OY.' �V O. r� �$ u 9 VO Y e uC O ',`� «. �0 Y d Y N � �� V V C�1 �V C •� N�. r4 —.wine }}..ocui� .«q y��`.�' a � Lam' •�s.L ems•. +Yc 4. tY �6p® �9t qqOL A ;;p �6 Y•a� C{:� wVq m—ppee _ f p V L.0 qO aL V1r Oie�.W ^N L s 1r m� �. V C`,Y G6 7 a V. .T Go -O«Y ''$d V Y C O�C• L �I G 17 «Y N V VO ^.N..q :C O.:i4 .r« y��N/gNQ® ��O O �` Si'pN,. ,L�Cj F•A, NCO _V Ay .`r.Q VN� _«pp�• ppQ4Q yf� C YY ICCY Yl4 •CCp OY� LYIL y$•VryYy V M•4y. C C«®®4L� V P �w qC Oe� L C C� YMO—C >016N �� >�Li 0 V^ _ O•s `O RO C'..S N RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIMS.COMMISSION OF. THE CITY :OF . R,'ICiiO.CUCAt�QNGA,;.CALIFORNIA; APPROVING A TIME EXTENSIOhI F(-c%TENTATIVE TRACT'NO, 13877, A 'RESIQENTIAL SUBDIVISION � ANb-DESIGN REVIEW OF 27. SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 18.01 ACRES., OF LAND•IN.THE. VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT' (LESS THAN�;i; DWELLING UNITS ?ER,ACRE),.:,LOCATE4 NORTH OF.WILSON„,-Ep,ST OF HERMOSA, SOUTH ;OF.HIl.LSIQE, AND WEST '.OF MA�;3E'RRY. AVENUE, f1ND' I�WNG FYNDINGS IN. SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 201-11I-05, 11, 13 and 32. 41. Recitals. ° Ei) Major J's 'Ltd., has._filed-an. application for ,,the extension of; Tentative Tract No. '13877 as -described in the title of il this'Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension''request is referred to as "the application." 1. (ii) On October, 12 1988, this .Commission" adapted its Resolution No. 88-209 thereby approvinq, subject to-specific conditions and time, Tentative Tract Na. 1'3877. (III) All legal prerequisites prior'to the*��loptibn'af this Resolution have occurred. B. Res.;,ution. 11s"?, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,deterthfned, and resolved, by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho•Cucamortga as follows: 1.` this Commis:sign hereby specifically`fjnds that all nf. the facts. set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this,Resolutiin are true and.correct. 2. Based upon, subst"tiai evidens� presented to',this Comnissian, including written and oral staff reports; this Commission hE.,eby specifically, finds as follows: (a) The previausiy approved' Tentative Map is in substantial compliance With the City's current 'General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and (b) The: extension of the Tentative' Map will_ not cause,. .,. significant inconsistencies, With the current General Kan, Specific" Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and (c) The extension of 'the Tentative Map is not likely to cause�� _ . public health or safety V",obl ems; and � RESOLUTION.No.. A RESOLUTION OF THE, PLANNING COMMISSION OF,THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. ISd77, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION i AND DESIGN REVIEW"O 27 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 18_01 ACRES.,. OF LAND IN THE, VERY LOW RESIDENTIrAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2, tiWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ,LOCATEJ:-NORTH OF_WILSON, EAST " OF HERMOSA, SOUTH OF HILLSIDE, AND WEST OF MAYBERRY RVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN �UPPORT THEREOF _ APN: .201-111-06, 11, 13 and 32. ' ,I A. Recitals. (i) Major J's 'Ltd, has filed an application for the extension of 'Tentative Tract No; 13877 as_ described! in the title of this "Resolution.' Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request it referred. to as "the application." J (ii) On October 12, 1988; this Comi'ssion adopted its Resolution. No. 88-209 thereby approving, subject to specific`conditions and time;limits,; Tentative Tract No. 13877. , (Ili) All legal prerequttites prior to"the.adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined,' and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: .III 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of a facts set forth in the Recitalsa Part A,_of.t his 'Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon su-stantiai evidence presented to this Commission. including written and oral'' ,taff reports, this Comm;.sion hereby s;�ecific .'v finds as follows: (a) The previously approved Tentative Me is "insuLttantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, Specific Plans,"Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and (b) The extension' of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and (c) The extension .of the Tentative Hap is not likely t0 CdUSe public health or safety problems; "and PLANNING .nPAISSIO.:PESOL"UT1O'W"Na, TIME EXTENSItiN FOR Irr 13877' Augus��:a- 1990 '_ Page 2 µ 1 ' (d) The extension is wfithin the time limas presr bed by state law and local ordinance. K, ` 3. Based upon tWfindings and conclusiozis Soh forth' in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Cummissian hereby'.grants a Time £ztensi ' for: . Tract plicant Expiration �..__ 13877 ttadar J!s Ltd. Octab_er'1 , 199), =' a 4 'The 5ecretafly to this COW Ssion shall certify, to tHa'adoptio- of this Ree,.Aution. p dG t APPROVED AND ADOPTED'THIS 8TH D0 OF AUGUST i990,, PLAY.".ING COMMISSION OF`TN£ CI7i OF RANCHO CUL1iMOHGA 4 �. s ,BY: Larry c let, Un#iman A' ` ATTEST: --ffr`aa',; u er ecre ary ;L I, Brad Buller, Secretary -of, the Alarming coarsnissian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby tprtify;=that the .for�aing Resolution ras duty and;, regularly, int^oduced, p,ised, and adopted by the=Q:anning Cotlmission of tale City of Rancho Cucamonga, at'a ;, 47ar meeting of the Planning Gomnissian held on.the 8th day of August 199Q, by the following vai040-wit: AYES: COMMISSI'C'SRS: HOES: COMMIS1,10NERS: ASSENT: COMMIS81ONERS: r r a n ? cr _t7^ OO Six < B � d W J U. H ffiO W f ll < RECENT[;Y OPENED-'STORES ST DEVE1L0°1cA/LANDr'Y.`L0 YEAR FULL-LINE Fort Smith `•R Omega Development 1988 Tucson(Oracis Rd.) rZ Alexander Co. 1985 Englewood CO Kravoo/Equitable Life 1987 Melbourne FL J.J.Gumberg Co.` 1987 Ocala Altamonte Springs FL Fem Creek Management: 1986 FL Melvin Simon&Assoc.Orlando(W.Colonial FL Montgomery Ward 1989 Chicago(Addison Mall) 1986 IL Lexington Develop.Corp. 1987 Niles(Village Crossing) IL Trammell Crow Co. 1989 Waukegan Lakehurst Mall) IN Jacobs,Visconsi„Jacobs 1988 Indiana olis GreenwoodSimon&Assoc. 1 g88 Indianapolis Lafayette) IN E.J.DeBartolo Corp. 1988 Indianapolis(Washington) IN E.J.DeBartolo Corp. 1988 Gaithersburg MD Danac Real Estate Inv.Co. 1986 Waldorf MD Melvin Simon&;Assoc. 1996 Sterling Heights Nil Ramco-Gershenson 1989 Las Vegas(Decatur Blvd.) NV Sterik Co.Corpus Chnsti(Sunrise) TX Paramount 1987 Irving TX Sudi��Grou 1987 p 1986 KIDS STORE Chicago(Chatham Ridge) IL "First Natl.Realty&Dev. 198g Chicago Ridge Calumet.City IL P,!cker Companies 198E _.JM?(Urban Investment 1989 Woodridge IL �a nmell Crow Co. 1989` Napervilla"(Fox Valley) IL Bradford Companies 1990 Melrose Park(Winston Plaza) IL Winston Plaza Assocs. 1990 HOME IDEAS Oceanside CA Alexander Haagen Co. 1987 Winter Dark FL Pat Legan 1987 Aurora,Fox Valley IL Zaremba 8 Plar 198� TX` Fox Group 1988 ` ELECTS>: ENUE ; Phoe6i Bell Rd.) AZ The Eves Co. Chicago North Ave.) 1987` Niless iL John M.Smyth Co. 19877 :L LaSalle National,Bank 1987 AUTO EXPRESS Calumet City IL GV-Q Development Corp. 1990 Chicago(44th&Pulaski) !L May department Stores 198i3 Chicago(Washington Blvd.) �L y Elmhurst B.F.Goodrich Venture Trist 1987 Niles IL Bank of Lyyons 1987 Palatine (Dundee Rd. IL Florence 6.Vinci 1989 Palatine(Northwest Hwy,) IL Factory Tire,Outlet 1987 IL Factory TIC Outlet 1987 Dunkirk IL Wood Dale �f;Nman" ,Sharfer,Anderson 1987 ' Hudson NY Graf Realty 1987 Kittanning NY Howard Rosenblum 1987 NQrfGllk Little Creak) PA Laurel of Kittanning 1987 ( VA Robt.M.Ste)n/Arena Assoc. 1989 n APPR9VEl7 NEW STt)RE5 � �o!? s�rt,Alloa�aYfeAo EFULL-LINE Mesa(East) AZ Westcor PartnersµY i 991� Rancho Cucamonga CA _: LoWIS Homes Salinas CA RileyMrai;Co, 1gg1 ViLtorviile CA �la,k Tarr&Co. 1990 Denver(Southeast) CO HomartMay Centers 1992 Jacksonville(Orange Pk.) FL Spring Creek Partners 1991 Jacksonville(Regency) FL Aronov DeveloRR n ht 1991 Orlando(South)- F4. Montgomery 1rVaret 1990 \ Savanna4 CA David Hacker 1991 Chicago j47th&Daman) IL • Melvin SIm0n&Assoc. 1990 Naperville(Fox Valley) IL Tucker Compant�ps 1992 „ Schaumburg IL: Tucker Cam,panies` 1991 Indianapolis(Cutlet on Sq.) IN E;J.DeBartolo Corxe. 1990 Topeka(Reloc.� KS :-Melvin Simon&.&kc. 1990 Cal^nsville(Re lac.) MD 'JMB/Federated„ 1990 Salis.iury(Reloc.) MD Waft Petrie/Sh6-* 1990 Westminster N40 Shopco 1990 St.Paul(Mldwa)°)(Reloc.) MN Trarnmr it Crtw Co. 1991 Kansas City(B ,njamin Plaza) MO Copaken,Whje,Sit ' 1991 AibuqueEque NM Malvin Simon•&Assoc. 1992 Saratoga Springs(fieloc.) NY Wilmorite,Inc. 1991 Camp Hill PA ,-Kravitz Properties 19g1 Harrisburg PA Mew Market Development 1991 Scranton PA Stio co1992, Arlington TX Sork�Coliins;Investments 1991 EC Paso(2nd Store) 7rX. MOvinr Simon&Assoc. 1991 Lewisville WoLamoth nc. 1990 Fairfax VA , Melinn.Simon -Assoc. 1991 Norfolk(Greenbrier) VA' Armada/Hoffiej,) 1990 Portsmouth(Reloc) VA E.J.USartolo Carp- 1992 Roanoke VA Faison Associatss 1990 f Lynchburg VA Failson,Associates 1990 AUTO EXPRESS aurae,Fox valley) IL Zaremba 1990 i I { a Sub]eet: contact. REMOMP1ED MONTCCOMERY WARD Uiarfe i'H.Thorne FULL LINE SPECIALTY STORE OPENS wtiia Relations Manager IN AF'ACH1E_MALL,ROC�"ES`3'ER (312)467-7573 ; FOR MIRIED1 ROCHESTER, WIN .May , 1189a -- A completely remodeled full-'line speciaty store v wb '1 �aa ot,,,iaily unveiled, y.ivlontg4 ..ery Willard &CO.,Gtoday in Rocheta Apache Mail at i'1at}Hvl_ 14 is Montgcmery,Ward ribbon-cutting was presided OV'Sr by -' Richard Beige[,President6iora flparatton of the Cl;itaga based speciaty retailer. "We have brought to Fachestet'a store concept tilat is unique,anyMivre in reLailing,"Aargei said. THs format,which eve introdt ced in Chicago`fast Fait with great success, is neW in tWms of design, mwchandlse presentation and customer.servici:. Each individual speciaity dateeory offers a distinctive design,{,ciiieved through visual y difierp.ices in ci ivrs, signing, anrd layout. Each :s finked!o. an integrated, setting;to crate tho feel and appearance of d.,contemporary'mail inside the storo. Art open design creates a'feeling of 7papfousnsss. "Vg°8 have combined ,the ,elementsf'of.serarate 'destination ,totes' ;with the t convenience of one-step sh,*-pping for customers sea:.-ng the merchartrise ,wa offer. i When a customer needs a specific item w carry, edt ,of our special+.y stores:has the breadth and depth of quality,brand name mera andlse,of a fine speciaity stars. But-we also provide customers with the°conVenisnca of being able to walk frarr+v one specialty to ' another,much fike in a r AL, i The design of the 90,480 gross square foot Ro.hester stare is the culm. Ation five years of a carefully, planned evolutionary process that bagan in 1,985 with the decision to undertake a majnr change:,., the ,way Montgomery Ward clogs bfssrrigss The company disc ontinued its catalog'operations -- the fou►elation of the .company dating back in 1872--and emt)arkad tin,a transition in its retail stores frorn that of mass merchant to a chain of value-driven specialty atores. more 4Y, Montgomery Wdrd Store-page Through careful:research that included close attention to what customer. w ire saying thoy wanted,the company has evolved into a chain of stores offering four ba5ir specialty merchandise categories: ELECTRIQAVENUe -- m*or appliances such as washor^ldryers, ranges, refrigerators and freezers; home elecharics such as stereos, camcorders, VCRs, microwave ovens, personal' compLiters,,home office equipment. and more; and outdoor equipment such as lawnrnowers and snow thr6wers. Name brands include Genoral Electric, Maytag, Sony, RCA,Amana,Zenith, , Panasonic, Toro, foffy, Tappan and rore. Many Populara-ands-'of tnlevisions form R dazzling"rit wail." HOME IDEAS -- furniture,, home accessories, b,.dding, tarps, small appliances, paj7t'and Wall e-ovedngs, gifts and decorative items, and a new specialty category callwJ WINDOW tQEAS featuring b broad array oilWJndowr coverings. Brand names include La-2-Boy,Sealy, cannon, Black&Decker, Levolor,Glidden,Simmons.-Eraun 7and Dan`diver. THE aPPAREL S1'QRE --`men's and wamen`c�';?parel and acce4sories, faaturin gs iality brandi thsc include JordacF� s-:,,,son,;Gotler„ Bill Slass, Hus f Pgpplas, Totes, Reebok, Diane v6p ihburg, ;Gitand'Lee and radny more. This category also includes KIDS ST RE,specially tlesia ad to make shopping fun for Moth kids and their parents,with juvenile furnlMre,car seats, strollers, pre-school toys and children's; apparel, featuring the cornpany'a exclusive line of "Raggedy Arm and Fi<<,ggedy Andy" clothes. GOLD'N GENAS,«Esc part of"ha Appan3l,category; is designed to.compefo .` with the best jewelry shorom; oms. it offers.out-!ftanding values in diam and1b, gold and other pre;ieu;ii ctones, in addition to watches and accessories. Custo"Im, w411 finr,. Seiko, Casio, Citizen and Bennis brands and many outstanding jewr.,7 designs.` AUT EX RESS-this More offers tires,batteries and Lutcmotive parts are .:-r- socessori,;s for do-it-yourselferss, and 3uarntees installation.of tires&;nd . -eiteries in 5,minutes or less. Brar;d names inE'iude Michelin, Bridgestone, E imstgne, e,r. Gocdtich, Champion, Monroe, D®Ics grid others: An ay equipped with state-of-the-art diegnastic 2;u1pinent. Train,, e;mechanics are available to periorm all but the most majorrepcir�,,. -Sore , t. Montgomery Ward Store-page 3 Full-line stores,such as in_Rochester, offer all these sA x location. Elsarl�ere,combinations of these sped ai Ih'categories in one smaller NPantgomery i9la eciard stores may offer one or uaroux , 5 e s, `Alt our spec city categories Offer dominant assor m-ents of some of the fCrast and J most recognized brand Werra rrrershandise to retaifing'Berge,,said. ` "in fact,vie have�,ecor�W l sri6 nations leading retailer of such familiar bwands as Maytag, CE. Sony, NAPA auto pis, Ste„ Tapan, BricTcJestone tires, Champion alrto batteries,and Smith Carona. 'All o.r I-RsrchaNisa is O ered at low price match any campetitor:s adve s errflr�v day, p as we guae ntoe to rtsed sale price vu+tf+in a 3Q-day period, to,custolne�Carr make purhases with aonfidenco,"Sergel added; ` trtf±..•, Miontgomeru Ward's specialty undetc?ana major Change in :''scent Yrs. h company td discontinued lhe ea itself has latmfWing and hardware ice favaro, tegories in which it could be directly competitive in a speciakf store environment. The hey vY emphasis on popular brand namee,. merchandise is apparent in ahe decor,with braid nantel used in the signing around the walls in many areas of the store. "r.�, tgan;ory Ward now offers a selection of to r. teories we caip quality, mdrChAndise in the TY that make us truly competitive with the best specialty s ores in the business,'Ser�,el said. Tate story will a+so include Doctronics,a cant'-in repair center offering service on all brands of small appliances anrf electronics. 'Customer sei�Ace ha*'a Very high priority, ands mfleete�d,even in the physical of the store," said Snore Manager Cannis Johnson.. "A good example is the store's Service Center, Located near the Ma-�'; the Service.Center is the iaci artdise Pickup Venter an the wet stile, paint of the store. Gift wrap,credit service and ati store business r-Przt►ons are conducted hers. The Service Center locates the Store Manager bui on the floor in order to be more accessl410 to',ustomers and in constant touctr with e---te operations,he explained."Gone are the days+when we hid a Store Manager in the,back oft.ee out of sight E Of everybody,"Johnson said. "we intend to provide truly Outstanding cusaomer service- here,and this on-floor location of Our kilt'functions will help us do just that." The 3,entcre A/ioptganrery Ward chaisr of value-drivera spt3ciia;ty stores rcrnently, Operates in';states na;icrywide. The Rochester stare employs some Q people rr the area .j f' ; 07 ray, as F f�T�'�•. r� 1 zy s 4 to o * tNAsry si '+r S3'� 61 t i•� tY � d 2 .s Li.l 'a 1 j+. �..2 tF t.F z'k4 "�► ,. tii fey '` Fi;, ti ..r � yp h��s _ � i �* r �t 5 4.il I i ki lh $FF•, � -,;,4�i ��l�,j,� J.xn``F � F ', �!r� sot��' 4 " tl l • � q� �' 1� .;}� s � �+r j, s' is T T YFfw x jj fa � w'a srJ',+g,� `fit ha • Yr. { 7 � T : � 'vra a r. v by E ,fi �P'i h-r w '1 r'f +,,n. •xa � rt1 u K +& r�� K. t F � e xa � ♦ � ji, �is~ry ",+i�'RI'tr�ry z`*¢ � � ri'`1 a.`�: r k�x f f'� a o'01, 'IX K� v_!}r� "l'"i� �y�`'v�7Yu ✓��?rk+� a Sat� � 'u ' " raw re �i �x-t��+� i tr i a ~fi } f 4 Y Ad _ FS 5}1 of L'Pip, dj n � � 5 i "yam I ���' �'�3 �.T• :; L t' r,, � N# °�.,5 ¢ art-.. - `� a. nX S'x'r..A'3A RM- �,N r err_; -��`fix,# �.,3. 4 ��'� ;��r 1«'�=#S • • * t wit £ ��� � j t <1 � r A+'�3 r 54 �2F "h W,„N Amm , Y ai r fa. ,{ _ i jj 5� yXi �5U•-yi # .•�{ `L�Q � fi 4'� �:Sit � A f r EMT ' ¢ Saki 8_e�` •`�'•• 'r. t 3�ir:, y.�afi a a{far» a 3' a'ssd5t�i —2tv AV n � 1 ti �x� . ....._Fa � �. ♦a A , i . � S-� ztfTS t`s 43 6 $ ry a#t„� h t NN -VlZ � r _ i f!. F } � Y tR JI i� +��i!��;rdc..�"q f g±e'i�'F t.y� e, � '4` '1 �� 'ls-.,. 1i• : y�a; � $�. nr"1`� ,+` 7 }►! � g ,+ a.ra`, F 'L'., i�z .: eY e 7 +f � -.�i f 'i G ri'^ C k, '•r ti a=p, 'tr `°-t'" 71, +"� i�f� 'Ff „�v 4� c?., 4 t; - �� .0 t ,+ f� t F;k y "� 4+Y `rp K e; ,d♦ ';6 j�allt�x 4 i t �° � a.w }� e,- >x n sIZ.+ t13r;0 A. y #p ^W X {yy{ 1 .yyf,.sr'� t s 3 4l r yyuk P top dOP k � � 'Irx F y, d S n Y .Yr 9 F I � t 1}x f tit ` ray r Y ST F �{ yri- r }�r &Y r Wt �`��+t�p,��7F4,�t ti tS�•yy ,�� }d k h b 8M AC e� i ew Ijj P Y l w 0 Its E¢, ip, s tM p Y L r �i �fjl t t M k t 1 a ti \F CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,MONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: August 3, 19gO h, 40. Chairman: and Members of the Planning Commission j FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CbRDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-12 l4ESTrRN PROPERTIES A.request for conceptual`approval "of Phase III site plan development within the Terra Vista Town Center, located at the northeast corner of Haver, .Avenue and Foothill Boulevard APN: 1077-421-05, 06s and 18- (Con-,tinued from July 25, 1990 meeting.) I. BACKGROUND: At the. July 25, 1990, meeting) the Commission. continued the above item to Ciis regular meeting, so that they could further review the—building—entries for Montgomery Wards and Child's World at the special workshco on August 2, 1990. Attached for your reference is the July 25, i990 Planning Commission Staff report. e,,- 11. RESULTS OF THi COMMISSION WORKSHOP: The Cor"fission reviewed the j revised plans and made the following,recommendations- 1. The conceptual design of the passageway through Building K.- The Commission accepted the design but recommended that circular raised tree planter or tree grates be used. The fi.nai design shall be subject to-City Planner review and approval.; =j 2. Building M'; The revised design of the pattern for the tile medallion is acceptable. 3. Monta%,mery Wards: Th�. Commission found the overall design ,of the building is acceptable except for the main building j entry. Although the applicant has proposed the use of camera stone material with architecture detailings to the bu,flding face', the building form is still the same one,- th{at the Commission had reviewed several times. The Commission � deliberated specifically on tAe, bof open truss Took. The Commission felt that the roof design is alit- from the architecture established °for th entire center an,.i does: not { provide for compatibility, The building entry design appears 1 to have too much of a corporate identity: The Commission,.41so discussed the mullion colors and found them to detrac -from the color scheme established for the .Town Center. -Th( �:o►mnission reconmended conceptual approval of ;the building with the ronditions that the building entry be -subject to further review by the Commission prior to plaii.checR ITEM B 7, I PtANNIKG COMMISSIQK ;'AfF REPORT CUP 88-1.2 - WESTERN OROPERTIES ,IULY 11, 1994. Page 2 4. 0ild`!s World: The Commission ed that the..."nvera'll ele ation is acceptab% with the condi'ti4n that the material for'the tower. ba!� shall be subject to further review. The "oymnission< suggested that, stone, pre-cant concrete, or other materials be used instead of plaster. I11. RECW MENbATIONS: Staff recommends-that the Planning Commission approve the modification through adoption of the attached ' - Resolution. Res p lly,r }tted, bra e City ' anne 88:NF:mlg ; Attachments Exhibit "A" Master Site plan " Exhlbi'�'"8" _ Phase III Site 'Plan - Exhibit "CO - Elevations Staff Report of July 25., 1990 ;t. Resolution of Approval 41 i II i Q l H i • oil hij csiuolat -C wa L.t AV-J•aINLs41 ', i11rV{�tS ` ir a: a 3. 8� gi ll eaCCpy�1Wp A _ i'J lYw ] ]' �u•r`urw3A 3� S �x 8 �ip 3 � ' � •A �t. 3bB 6f= 3SA' 0E!!t ~ © j �L ?JJ N.. Jt�nw•�1...'.,r � tnxm+ro«..? 6_ 2 On 1 z J d. •3� �' �• _ � AaP� �'N J�4�� �� a r ti x kf- tea _�-. . tz- t w i AV WE6d1 Ge S..F 2� •..!3 s I w x 3 s i }�f{i771 a AV cz, tL a 1 r S - Air Ij r3r �. d— `r wit, �w utic1 i -MI.{E � ���u•� �I;`Su _.1 i i ,i.1.P1� :•' elt � i tti o y �.(phi ,� i fl � i.� •;!. x s; o. f� 4 � 1 i •'! �) 1 oll Li wk.= �'�i nw�bga Or f �w <IL i r Ps t x� i x a a c g In u< ±axe It11i+147 �IN i > lil ,— �J y '.i. 'v �@- k• 1.f aYg by I:� � .�. I ti :n Y � all Em tc S 5 O� r 1, o 777 S �.•�i .�`w ft- ' III f7 ae ins S LM i r• Y f - •n w• . �' ••-Fn Ill Y� .i 1Y � ESj y I uuo �e —1 it 9ss 1,14 r. jc oil 2. 1, •1 I f i lJC! t UM < o 11) a6J. ..rs- 17 �3 a �uW � c t.3 i illl{IiIJ i q �1 g = y Aa 4 :r J �- ta s r for 9 �r Y {} Ar 777 OLIO it it ra MT i 00 1` 3 P v tau JN } lit" Q Y— ;[ .ate : :�" .fI {J will •� ) �'` .�.-: r--; ""�. '—T"' .fir= "-��.'r� 4 11�t wa1 S lit 44 °� t�, � ° ,�' •. � t is �) f. - 4:- i}}ha�k(� a{ `�}AjpjQa� . 7jjjyFy {Q Of 33 txi 1 M 'd�13':iYialf Ali ' 7y /M �f �J 11 4� �S �2� m lV n c' F b ;fir N r ^ Z r a, Q ) J N ,t r k k a f r 1 t 4 . -" CXW OF RANCHO CUC'ANIONGa STAFF REPORT DATE: July 25, 1990 TO; Chairman-Iand'Members• of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bui,ter, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong: Senior Planner SUBJECT: M0 1FICATION`TO CONDITIONAL: USE PERMIT as-12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES - A request for t.onceptual approval 'of Phase Ill site,plan;wi'--.1n tht,Terra Vista Town Center, located at the northeast orner', of,Haven` Avenue and 'Foothill Joulevard - APN: 1077-421-05, 05, and 15. . (Continued from July 11, 1990,) I.. SACKGRJUND;-•` At the July 11, 1990 r:;,:eting, the Commissioi-` continued the 'above item to this 'regV�i'ar' meeting. A special workshop was conducted on July 1,9, 1990, to further review,the site plan and elevation. The following section discusses ,the results of the workshop, 11. RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION WORKSHOP; , �t A. Site Plans The Commission reviewed ,the proposed revisions to the Phase III :site plan in areas of pedestrian connections the passageway through'Building K and the depth of the storefront walkway. The Commission found, the revisions to.be acceptable subject to a condition that., the final design should ;be submitted for City Planner review and approval: 8. Elevations:' 1. The Commission conc`Lptualiy approved `the elevations for Building K., 2. Montgomery Wards: The Commission ' reviewed the elevations and determined that the design is improving; however, refinements to the elevations should be provid'ed' as follows: a. The building entryl form is 'acceptable. Woweve'r, , architectural refinements should be added to break up the narrow linear look of the column's. Further, the exterior sides of the columns_and arches shall �1q E° P'RNNING COMMISSIOPt STAFF REPCR MOb. TO CUP 88-12 - :STERN PROPER'i'IE5 July 25, 1990, Page 2 be restudied to determine the appropriate use of the canters stone. ====The study shall- include the evaluation .of the Lvitire entry structure as i't . ` progresses into':fhe interior of the building, b. :The arch insets along the south elevation:on both sides of the main entry shall have a' minimum depth of one foot. . De,•,;"ils, and cross sectians'showing thi's a,nd the connections between the arches shall be providedfor Commission review. 3. Building L: The Commission reviewed the°elevations and - found them to be acceptable. The tower has been pushed back so that :the columns are.now 16 feet from .the curb".. 4, Building M.i The Commission found the elevations to be acceptable with,, the`condition that the orientation and design:of the ceramic" file meda;''Ion be,Chan back to .,. the original-design. != 5. Child's World: The :Commission reviewed;the elevations and recommended furthsr changes as follows: a. Provide decorative trim around the,,arch, on the tower. Auk b. Add light fixtures on the tower, �y c. The wainscoat at the tower should be "pop out" instead of flush ;with the column. d. The arch element at t#'3 north and east elevations should be treated With additional architectural detailing and elemeo.ts. 6. Montgomery Wards TBA Building: The Commission reviewed the elevations and found them to be acceptable with the . condition . that window bays instead of I3tra.ight storefronts should be provided. 7. . Signs,',, The Commission stated that the signs, shown on the elevations, especially Montgomery Bards Proposed signage, were not part of this review and approval. Any signs proposed must,comply;with. the uniform Sign Program established for the Town.Center. PLANNING fOMMISSION "TAFF REPORx MQO, TO OP 88.12 - .STERN PROPERTIES July 25, 1,090 Page 3 The Commission ronciuded that the proposed elevations for-this Phased development have improved s0s.ta-nti'ally. However, the revisions needed for Montgomery Wards and Child's World shall be submitted for their review prior to formal approval of the Conditional Use Permit modification. A special workshop has been .. scheduled on August 2, 1990, to review the revised elevation. 111. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue this itOm to the August 8, 1990, regular meeting. Respectfully submitted, Araduller City Planner BHN�f3fs 1 ;i =h RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM14ISSION OF THE CITY•'OF RANCF!0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, .APPROVING THE MODIFICATION � TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 8842 FOR PHASE. III, OF`-THE TERRA VIE.TA TOWN CENTER, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AmD FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; ,MD< MAKING FINDINGS' IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1077=421-05,:;06., AND ;18. A. Recitals. s (i) Western Properties has-;filed a request to smodi,fy ,Phase IF.I;•of '.he Terra Vista Town Center as•described in the title of•t'his P.esolut.ion•, (ii) On-the 13th of .lune, 1990, the Planning 'Co mmis4ion.of the City of:Rancho 'Cucamonga conducted .a duly noticed public hearing on-the application aild continued said hearing to. the .July 11., Jul;y 25, `And August 8 1990` meetings. (iii) On the 8th of August*' 1990, the Commissivr, Concluded said, hearing.. (iv) All zngal prerequisites' prior to the :adr t'an of this Resolution have occurred. , r. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it.,is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc4imonga•as folleWs: 1..' This Commi--ssion ..*ereby specif call,y.'f nds that all of _V, 'iacts' set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true.and correct:. 2. Based upon substantial evidence rpmenfed to this Commission' during the above-^4ferenced public hearing on June igi> 1�90, including Written and oral staff reports, together with-publir testimony. this Commission hereGy specifically finds as follows: (a) The application ;applies to' property. located at'the northeast; corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of t2,700:` feet and 'lot depth of *1,h40 feet and .is presently:under,c. ;ruction; and (h) The property to the north of the subject site 's vacant, the` property to the south of that,-.site consists of an office complex, the property to the east _is vacant land, and the property to the west' 1s an; entertainment/offite complex- hl Y, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88-12-- K$TERN PROPERTIES` August;8, 1990 Page 2 3. lased' upon the substantial evidence presented, .to this Commission during the above-referenced public,heating-.and upon then§pecific rindi^^s of facts set forth in paragraphs and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds ,andr concludes as follow'i,, (a), That the•proposzd use is in accord with the General`: Plan,' 7 Development. Code, and the ;purposes of the district itv� the objectives of the which the site is located. (b) That the proposod use, , agether with the conditions` applicable thereto, will not be detrimental t the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to p:•operties or improvements Wthe vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development:,Codc--., - 4. This Commission hei'eby`finds and certifies. that_t",.prdject has been reviewed and considered,'in compliance-with the Cgl"ifornia Envljnmental Quality Act of 1970 sand, further, this Comissiaa - •issued a 'Negative' Declaration on April 27, 1988., i 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs , 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves 66 application Subject to each and every condition set forth below;. Planning Division (1) All pertinent conditions of approval .as contained in Resolutions 68-75, 88-118, 88=-236C, and 89-120 shall a ppl (2) A ?ri`an connection shall be provided 'from the nor,, of t o passageway through Building , K tbwaeas, ie northwest side of Building K-1. The final design shall be subject to Ci „j Planner review and approval .prior to issuance`of building permits.` ` (3) A pedestrian' connection shall be extended from the westerly promenade east to Pad N (Shakey's). The final desim, shall be subject. to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The elevations of.' Buildings K-1 and K-2 facing, the passageway shall include storefront• design. The J pedestrian passageway shall include amenities' such as : but. not limited to; overhead .trellis; attractive landscaping, seating benche's,,:suffic, ent lighting and,' 5 other hardscape. The "design .shall be subject "t•` to City Planner review and- approval prior. to issuance $ of building permits. e X PLANNIN CONN"iSSION RESOLUTION N'). � CUP 88-19 z WESTERN PROPERiI��S August.8 1990 Page 3 (5) �1. minimum depth 16, feet shall be rovided'between p P any„structures or'.buil.ding columns and.the curb line. (a) Window, bays ihal V,bs Orovided to the storefront of Montgomery, Wards.. TEA building. Thfinal design shall be subject to'City Punnet review and approval, prior to issuance of bull ding.permits ` a (7) pedestrian connection" from Spruce.'Avenue west, to a' Wards TBA building shall be provided. The fiWal design shall be subject to Ci vy` Manner, review ark .,;r. approval;prior to issuance,Of:buil'drng'perm-ts ((.r The planter width on. both sides of the `column at"the east elevation- of the Montgomery-tWaHt, TBA building shall bo a `minimum $'feet,insiGe di46nsitin (column to curbs): Ihs final design shall be'auL4ect to City Planner review.and;approvai. (9) The applicant shall maintain the sculptures/art, pieces In good condition .for the life+ of "the sculptures/art pieces. J / (10) An alternative textured material other than -',colored . 4� concrete shall be provided 'in Phase III development. The textured inaterral .and color,s`h�aII be subject to,.hesign Review Committee review` and approval prior td. issuance of building permits. (11) The building entry design 4for the Montgomery Ward shall be subject` to 'Commission review and approval r. . prior to plan check. (12') The final color for the mullion for Montgomery Wal^dy shall be Subject.to Commission revi ew and 'approval prior to plan check. (13) The material f.,> the tower base for Child's Worldf shall be subject to Commission Revia. and 'appro%aj prior to,plan heck. Engineering Division (1) All drive ;approaches s;alI conform to Standard No.- 306' including a vaximum ':radius of 20 feet. , (2) Provide a smooth transition from the' drive .approactr to the drive aisle for: the `easternrn^st "driveway. on Town Center Drive. s I� PLANNING COMM14SSIQN.RESOLUTION NO. ,. CUP 88-12 - WESTERN.PROPERTIES' Au'aUSt.80 `1990 Page 4 (3) y All applicahla landscaping and sy ^eet improvement. t ,.: " plans shall. be *,revised to 'reflect' the driveway relocations and',approved -by'the City Engineer prior to final map amendment; ;issuance"of-building;perm its,, or ,i.ssuante of encroachment permits, whichever occurs , . first. (4) Parcel 'Map 11036,i.shall be amended" iQ1 bring' atti non-vehicular accesses into. conformance , with- the, Conditional' Use'Permit`as modified. = � (5)` All off-site improvements -shall ^be completed and accepted by the City'Councll in accordance with Gitiy Council RP-Salutioh No.=$8-357, 6. The.Secretdry to,thi.5 ommission shall certify to the adopt" ';of this Resolution. APPROVED AND,HCOPTEb THIS StA, DAY .OF 'AUGUST 1990. "Y PLANNINn C013+9IaSI.ON OR 76fE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i 4 BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST. Brad Bul i er, see retsry , I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning .Commission of 'the City of` Rancho. Cucamonga,' do. he certify, that ''the .foreya►n Resolution ,ivas disiy,.arni' - regularly introduced,, passed, and adopted. by the 'Planning Co issiost of' the. City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular. meeting of the Planning Commission held' on the 8t.h day of August,,1990, by,the`'fol lowing'vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS 7 . ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: '` t r CITY OF RANCHO"CUCAM6NGA, - STAFF REPORT ; 1 ` n :DATE: August"8; "990 'T0: Chairman and Members ©tithe planning "C mmission 9 FROM: Barrye R' Hanson, Senior Civil: Engineer:,, BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant:Eggineer" SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; AND` TENTATIVE PAP,CE'L 10 131'13 RONALO � a;,$u .,i`v s,on o . acres -ocean ; into' parse s �.imt,a very l Residential (less "than 2x' dwelling units per' acne), 1oca2ed on. +tie r,r. sl e,of Strang"Lane, east of CirneiUn Street,APN,' (1051-271 08)." I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Action•Re uested': Approval of the proposed Tenta"titre Pa-Me1 Map.as_ s Fo on c t "B ' B. Parcel iSize: Parcel 1- 21j780;SF Parde1 2- 35 719 SF - Total C. Existing'"Zoning: Very,.,Low �;R:sidential ' District, (hess' than, 2 dWl ing 'units''"per acre) D. Surrou tiin9 Land Use: f _ North Existing `Single lamily; South -, Existing Single Family* EaSt'- Exlsting.Single Family West"- Existing.Singl.erFamily r I1RE1 C PLANNINGL COMMISSION'STAFF,REPO I2T PM 13113 - RONALD &'.SUSAN NUNNALLY. PAGE 2 £, Surrounding General Plan and'D661i Dment Code;;Designations: s North Very`-Low Residential District South -:,'Very Low lksidentiM Di'strilet East - Very Low-Residentiial District West,- Very I.ow Residential District , F. Site Characteristics: Parcel 1 contains a Single family residence 'and 'a natural. ,drainage channel located.on,thE westerly portion of the parcel : Parcel>2 is vacant. II. ANALYSIS•' r , The purpose of' this Parcel leap is�to divide 1.3,2 acres of,Iand :into two'. parcels. Parcel`I will cohta n the existing residence,: ` Parcel 2 wt13 be� developed in the future. .Both parcels will take access from.Strary 'Lane which was designated a privat�.street_by.the City Council. by:the attached Resolution No. 90-186 on May 2;, .199Q. This exempts the project .from dedication of public right-.of-wary and standard public` improvements ":on: Strang Lane. Presently, Strang .Lane is to .approximately 20 feet in width fJ5 m Carnelian Street easterly to'the; site.a distance of approximately lOQO feet and is maintained by the property, owners. The Fire Qistrict usually requires, minimum..tvitlth of, 26 feet:,- However,, .because'the location of . the existing homes and'the tilt 'estabtlthed landscaping, makeswidening g - g access very diff(cut t, the district. it.,.wild in accept the,existin with, the condition that fire',sprinklers and. a non,-combustible''roof :be provided for the future:singlz'family,Mae to be constructed on Parcel Z, and that.rrivate street improvements along the frontage-of the project, site be :installed. to Fire 'District standards. These.=coedit ons_ aee included in the Resolution of approval . III. ENV IROMM1.NTFt REVIEW: The. appl icant completed Part ,:I ::of the Initial ?. to to con acted afield ,inv estigaton and completed Part II of the Initial Study, No adverse impacts upon the. -environment .are, : anticipaited as 'a resul^`.of this project. Therefore, issuance,' of'Negative f Declaration is appropriate. o- PLANNING.COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' PM 13113 - RONALD b SUSAN;NUNNALLY AUGUST°S 1990J. PAGE 3 IV. CORRESPONDENCE.. "Notices of Public Hearing have been 'sent to surrounding praperty-ow;lei and placed in ;the Daily Report t�wspapu.' Postinq-at the, site.has also,veen,`.completed. Y. , RECOMMENDATION. .' it is recommended that the PIanr°ing• Connission consider. a f t put and�e1e�r°enics ',uf the Tentatfve Parcel..Map,,13113. `If after such consideration, the Commission';can recommend' approval, then the,',adoption of the attachN Resolution and 'issuance of a Negative t3eclaratio'n would be appropriate: Respectfully submitted,` it Uarrye R. Hanson Senior Engineer. SRH:BK:jh "° r° :Attachme nts: . Vicinity (Map (Exgibit- A } Tentative Map,(Exhibit "8°) Location Map .(Exhibit "C' _City Council Resol.utian Mo. 90-186 Resolution and,. Recommended;Conditions of:Approval q 3i q WE •r, N �wlll 1 111 i11i mN IIIIII lilt�;;;;;■ s ..__® p■■■■ ®!• • �n�'!®® 111®an is®If1ll1 on on .r _qp a MUM!Mill Nas as 104 NSA 7. aan n:_ __••" 1111®` ® ® Illllll®® ■..Gut 1:_=CC Illlml� ®® HIM ONE i! v psong milli Bill Hill ■r �;I� ■ !! r�-!II � /I /Iflflfl ® p�111t ili+��■ ■��®■ ` � ®®,111! �`��® , ®_®Ilfflll�.: u■IIe Ism r Ate'llllflff®oiois ■fat Ifil®lil ■ 1 MC Hmill ..®on iBr- _ar' Gagnon .,®—...,�, ►v�►/►®r o 11111111111m _ ► e■�t� ��!v ®® ♦ Gast■■ •i r®�� ® 'a°® ®®,®ts =_I® ®`®j ,I®A111N1/11111 :®'■ ��®sit 1111 1� ��%�®1�®s®®/IIIf��✓®®®�'®�s! mean PRION to '.® e ®I=® I I1 IIIN s H®®®®®Ilfillfll®�®� ■ ®®_�n ■ III �� �®a®ff1111 111fill 11n6®1, `o a° OOM 111®® ■®® 11 INI �,�® ®11�IIIIIU®®®®®®millMUM p®•s p III_tom==o IGO smvd■■ _®_!®'® ® A°•®•°®: ® ■s —/ll11 Ilf �!MIN ! A�� ®.®,t,®® ®® �®•sent !!! ♦tr��s ! .a: S + s- u� bra --• s `r � i • � m �' t�1 ti I ` `'•\•` �^ .•ter � • 'f *1 �d- aS I ..I...e:u0e0. STAEEF-7-� ,yytJ •�p� � � �____�_� — LLL t3 _— �` caeab4fRc IS 3 •r C " �,' ,t1 C,• .tCYLd � Y..vY�.:C �[vn.:.e Q` vN.,...Y�• 7 C I,y1� 7�`r y � �� L• tMi00fN iaRM Al•ap r ( y /, I�, r, JI1 ` Pn! P. ;yy�,� I ` ra7E ? .T77. I ,• r- 1 k�ar ,� s� oman V G O £"M�"z h a �3 (, LAI 51. a4a i LEGEND Existing HI MeS � CITY OF MM RANCHO L04A T/Q)V MA MW ENGMEERIIdG ,DIVMON 3� RESOLUTION NO. 90-136 JML A RESOLUTION ;OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,' CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING STRANG; LANE AS A PRIVATE STREET AND EXEMPTING,'THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 12.08;OF THE, MUNICIPAL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has decided that certain residential streets, being unique in.nature`, function as private residential street; and WHEREAS, the City+ Council has decided. that properties abutting,. private streets should be exempted from gar'tain requirements normally ?: attributable to public streets; and r WHEREAS, the City,Council has adopted Ord`"Inarte"No. 584 creating and !'' establishing the authority to designate certain stroats as private residential streets. WHEREAS_ the;Citjr Council finds as follows: A. 'A portion of Strang Lane,, situated from Carnelian Street to the easterly terminus of Strang, Lane- (approximately 1300') meets aii 'of the requirements set forth in Chapter 12,08.055 of the Rancho Cucamonga 'iunic�r:J1 Code; B. The designation of said portion of Strang Lane as a Private Residential Street wii3 not adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of tha:e persons and properties adjacent to, and in the vicinity of, such !street. C. That a Private Residential Street designation for said portion of Strang Lane is in conformi p with the General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resoive as follows. SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.' SECTION 2; Said portion of Strang Lane Tecated'from Carnelian Sheet to the easterly terminus of Strang Lane is hereby designated as a " private street and the abutting properties are exempted from the requirements set forth from the provisions of Chapter 12.08 of the City of Rancho -Cucamonga' Municipal Code, SECTION 3 With the designation of that portion of Strang tams as a private streets it shall join the 'list of so designated private streets set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorpK.%ted herein by reference.' I j PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of May, 1990. . Resolution page 2 AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Stout, Wright NOES: None ABSENT. None '�, Dennis L. Stout:- _ Yor w., ATTEST; Debra 1 Ad , City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADMS, CITY C�ERK•'of the City`of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council iheld on the 2nd day of May, 1990, Executed this Srd day of May, 1990 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4kra:J. Ada : City G1eA i ti a' soluwn ;ia.:=4u-_mac ?age 3 EXHIBIT "A" DESIGNATED PRIVATE STREETS Name of Street -Portion of Street 1. Strang Lane Carnelian Street to 1300` east Sixty percent (60%) of the property owners signed the petition. One Hundred percent (100%) of the property owners rt the public hearing Were in favor of the private street designation. i 4 t t� .+CP # 14 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE: PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ; RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,- CONDITIONALLY -APPROVING - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP-NUMBER 13113, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STRANG LANE EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1061-271-08 WHEREAS; Tentative Parcel Map Number 13113, submitted by Ronald and Susan Nnnally, ;applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into ,2 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,S at of Strang e California, easia identified tified as APH(s) 1061-271--08, located on the north Lane, f Carnelian Street; arid , WHEREAS, on July 25, 1990, and continued to August 8, 1900, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS; SECTION 1: That the following findings have been =�de 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. h2. That the improvement of the, proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site 5s physically suitable for the 'proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivisim and improvements will not cause subs.tantia'. environmental damage or public - health problems :or have adverse affects on abutting properties SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has` been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Envirormenta1 ' Quality Act of`1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3. Tentative Parcel Map Number 13113 is hereby approved subject to the` attached Standard' Conditions and the fallowing_ Special Conditions: A. Engineering Division: n 1. A 10 foot easement for local equestrian trails shall be provided along the east,and south property line of Parcel 2 including a standard corner cut-off at the southeast corner of said parcel. 1 'RESOLUTION NO. ";. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE' CITY OF ' '.mmo cuckONF-t ; CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL��MAP-NUMBER 13113 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STRANG LANE EAST OF .CARNELIAN STREET, ;-dD MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1061-271-08 WHEREAS,, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13113, submitted by Ronald and-' Susan Nunnally,,%appllcant; for the purpose of.subdi.0diag,intp, 2 parcels, the real property, situated in. the City of Rancho 'Cucamonga', County of San . Bernardino, State of Californ;'ra,' identified,as APN(i) 1061-271-08;. located on, the north side of Strang Lane,,,east of Carnelian Street; and , WHEREAS, on July 25, 1990, and continued to August ,8, 1�190, the Planning Commission held a duly advertise.! ,public' Oear ng for the above- described map. NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RE".. `.�.AS ; FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with°the General Plan. 2, That the improvement of the,tproposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. - 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the,proposed subdivision anti improvements will not cause substantial environmental-damage or pub!id health problems or have adverse affects on ribittting properties, SECTION 2: Tilit Commission finds and certifies that the project ha ' been reviewed, and considered in compliance with the California-Environmental Quality Act of 1970; and further, this Commission hereby issues a_Negative:, Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map 'r 13113 is hereby approved .' :.. . subj�i;t to the attached, Standard Conditions and the following S,peciai Conditions: A. Engineering Division 1. A 10 foot easement for. local equestrian trail shall,be provided along the east•and'south property: line of Parcel 2 including a standard corner clvt-off at the �i southeast corner of said parcel;. I n' a+ANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ATIV.E PARCEL,MAP 13113 AUGUST 89 1990 ' PAGE 2 2. A request, to vacate- thfi'r existing right-of-way dedication for Strang Lane adjacent to the project site shall be submitted and the vacation completed prio to final, approval of thr Parcel 'Mzp. B. "Fire District '+ 1. Submit to the Fire District a completed' Change Request form and the required fee `prior to final approval of the Parcel Map. ?. Provide residential fire sprinklers in . accordance' with N.F;;P.A. 13D, for the future res Bence on Parcel 2 at t)e time of its development. 3. Install the street improvements along the frontage of the project site in accordance' with, district standards, except for street width,; prior to final approval of the Parcel Map. 4. Install non-combustible Class "A" roofing' on the future residence, in accordance with UBC Standards at ' the time of its development. If APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS Sth DAY OF AUGUST 19,90. 3a , PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: f� Larry T. McNiel, Chairman I,. ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I,, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of.; Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution'was duly and regslarly introduced, passed; and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of Au3ust 1990, by the following Vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIO,iIERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 4 S � N 'F cc_m pp e � � ol TZ �• —C Y fwyep AME Q� d.Y `^" "1V.f A� OW H Y= d16 tl M y gld ®�@qpF �11" b � E ar to LP WCO 97 JL r R2 =``. C�•6`& p r E. Lk r � 1}3j �g g'� r I •''Lp8 .®.Sv�Ame ,n'"�' tl� m �ii'Qd3�a,. If�w . YM� b� :.:q bC Y dCp C �b. I I LS�.y 6:WO Q.2 r g5C Opl M': aVY • gz b Y. Q r p SCM JU NY Cp: O� JCw 9S - Bw C„G •r r O� ^o Y p c m ® aY au 9 T'` G_ � N coV AH s�o ao® SON O c 9 oa oc Yc r ra ri. cN vN' y Lp �� r 99 L�G! �• 00 O�Cu 9 Y C 0 b YOM �C p4u^ 6NN VN� CY Qt� Oy�.gyyV Off. Lry N C C O. OCa ts 9� C-9 Y iY Y M 9 � Mtl 4p� y6 =iti C qnS L=�t Q� M3cp H $g® �� p CC 27 �� «-5 S"U CpC�yq �c gR ��8y ➢;`9�a�' � oo CwCa �ti (t/� CC.Or NC ON Ya N -Yv P�~O A •y 1Yr �� .. !A 0.- O. `� ••9 C O O1 d •O r$ "L^U�Y Yy Gyi s!1 C 7M E c � •fc �a � �o�$ M �� �0 4�V� Q 6 i �C O 1 c a q� Y Gil C ^I CITY OF RANCHO C,f' .`wIONGA STAFF REPORT. a DATE: August8,"1990 ` T0: Chairman and 'o Members the Planning Commission FROM: Brad-Buller, City,Planner BY: Bruce Bucki`ngh6r ;Manning Technician SUBJECT: Ah,ENDMENT l'0 UNIrORM'SIGN`'PROGRAM FOR MILCER•'S' OUTPOST PLAZA' -` PIZZA NUT An :appeal ;of•staff,s decision;`-to deny a:'s.lgn program amendment, .l.ocated at.the northeast ,co.rner ,of Footh 'I1. and Archibald AP,N: 1077-641=71 (Continued; from 'July 25, 1990) > y This item was continued,;,,,, ,the August 8,' 1990 Planning Commiss do Meeting to allow the applicant to be present at this meeting. Rttacl`ed is a copy of,the July: 25, 1990_St6ff Report. nj ..t Resp ly to Brad City P annener BB•BB:sp Attachment: Exhibit 111" - July, 25, 1990 -Staff=Report 4, 4 ITEM' - 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANLONGA 41 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 25, 1990' TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Buckingham, Planning Technician SUBJECT: AMENDMt4T TO UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM FOR MILLERS OUTPOST PLAZA PIZZA HUT - 'An appeal of staffs decision to deny ` a sign program amendment, ibcated 'at the 'northeast corner Of Foothill and Archibald - APN: ,1077-641-71 I. ABSTRACT: The appli;;ant, Kodash, Inc. is appealing the decision of Planning staff which denied an amendment to the Millers Outpost Plaza Uniform Sign Program, to allow for major tenants to i, have red signs,. II. BACKGROUND: In 1983, Plann%g staff approved` a .Uniform Sign Program for the Miller's Outpost Plaza at.the northeast'corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. The Uniform Sign Program designated "cabrillo bold" as the unifr?m'letter.stile, and Yellow Number`2016 as the uniform, sign color. The three major tenants approved as part of the shopping center; Millers Outpost, Chief Auto P7 rts, and Conroy 0s, were given the flexibility of choosing . their own letter style and color through the design review process. On August 24, 1987, the Uniform Sign Prog^am was amended allowing major tenants alternative letter Myles per City Planner approval. Major tenants were defined as businesses occupying a minimum of 5,000 square feet or a franchise organization with 5 or _ more stores. On May 22, 1990, a representative for Pizza Hut, Inc. submitted a Sign Application for their• enew `take-out only" location" of approximately 1,000 square feet in the_Miller's Outpost Plaza. They submitted an alternaVve lettty, style with red sign copy. Planning staff approved the "corporate letter style" but rejected the red sign copy as inconsistent with the Uniform Sign Program: On June 5, 1990, >Kodash,, Inc. submitted an amendment to i.he Uniform Sign Program to allow major tenants red signago. Following a review, Planning staff denied the request to amend the Uniform Sign Program on June. 11 1990 (see Exhibit "A"). On° June 21, 1990, Kodash, Inc. appealed the decision to the Planning , Commission (see Exhibit "B"). M ,x.✓r D� �fJf PLANNING C6MMISSION STAFF:RFPORT:, AMEND UNIFORM'SIGN'PRt�Gr1MJMTLl.ERS Ol1TPOS7 PLAZA July .25', 1990` 3 Page 2 f, ANALYSIS; Thee current...Uniform. Sign Program llows for yellow`, ,. } internally i,Ll.ltiminated' channel letters a .Maximum;of 1$ inches in+ height with the CabriTto bold letter style .fsee Exhibit 11 'oj It `► also gives flexibility toyfmajor, tenants -for alternative letter Y` styles. In addition, a &;Vporate,logo maybe'used in conjunction with the business name 1i,/any color that zs compatlbl'ft with the . �l} center. Ail, of these criteria- allow.,',for tenantsi t6 lsdequate•ty identify their businesses' as well e'as .maintain ;and piomoie, ,any J11 nationally or locally recognized identity. Furthermore, , at permits same individualityiithollt. disrupting the% continuity of G the shopping center. The proposed devietiort from�the:yellow letter-color allowing any ' or all major tenants red :,sign copy 'would create =a chaottc color r �' `. pattern effectively reducing,the, unity of the center.-. There are currently at feast 4 tenants:(Kentucky Fried Chicken: 7- 11,.Buster Brown, and Qwik Blinds), ,in additinn to` Pizza NIA,` that 'are �( nationally or ?vocally known franchises that have conforming yei.16w :, . signs. ?he intent of. a Uniform Sign',Prograr is.to adopt:specific;desig' standards to incorporate a theme and to :create' lcniform design elements to consistently :,be carried throughout all tenant signage. . This is achieved by limited variation,io sign color and design, :All.hwing red signage;to intermix with the existing yellow would erode the.purpose of=the Uniform Sign Program'by.putting the main focus of the eenier on the. signage rather -'than the architecture, The overall harmony. 'and .attraeth",iVeness of the center, tdould be' diminished by two boil colors,, being used with no continuity as ,to location. 'Furthermore, the color coordinators now achieved would effectively be lost 'lessening the.,theme rof the,-,:,- center. Over theyears, many nationally, and/or locally, recognized '. businesses have complied with tihis' center's Uniform Sign ' Program.- Tc alter the Uniform Sign Prograrrt_ aarmi'tting.,red.si.erla e would .be unfair to the other, tenants who have .been willing to conform. In addition, this is a relatively,small ;shopping center, the type for which Planning Commission has established informal policies limiting the variation, of sign color,- �pizza. Hut, ,.tnc. T currently has one other location in the. City, of ;Rancho Cucamonga, at the southeast corner of Carnelian, Avenue and 19th Street;: These signs are in conformance with 'the Uniform, Sign Program;for r;. that center and; are non-iiiumirated'wood signs with cream-letter, Y!� color. !! i ie r � t t �� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'REPORT AMEND UNIFORM SIGN PROGAh1/MILLERS, OUTPOST-PLAZA Juiv 2�5,.1990 Page 3 IV. CONCLUSIOk In conclusion,' the current �bni"form ZIgn Program,js more an adequate in' alla owl ng` ulr the tenants to uniquely identify, themselves. Addi4g more flexibility -arid cblcr to ,the signage.of'the_center would diminish the focus.on',the architecture of the center which should be the dominant element., V. RECOMMEhWI� iON: Staff .,recommends _that the Planning",CoTaissi.on up o s a deni al ial of the amendment to'.the Uniform Sign M Program; :y . Resp ly submitted, , _S. Bra er City annex ; BB:BB:Js Attachments: Exhibit "A" -'Ciiy Planner Denial Letter Exhibit °By`. - Letter of';Appeal Exhibit"G" - Sion Program i 1 { .t s I Vim, �r4 zi M I. V RAAtCkO CUJ A24iQIaiGA Post O[+a Sox 607,pwne Cucamnrol Calvarras wzg t'ta1 SO te, o. June 11,1990 ' ry. Sabrina.Heffion,: Kodash,Inc. 5250 W.,Cet:tury Blvd." �r Suite:307- i+. Los Angeles,CA 9f1045, SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO`UNIFORM SIGN,PROGRkM#14 r} (MIJ LERS:OUTPO$T KAZA). k ., ' Dear Mr.,Miller., ,. The Planning,Dtvision has-Ireviewed.your request to amend tt e'Urtiform Sign i'rogranilb the , Miller's Outpost Plaza located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Foothill:"5pedfically,you have requested that certain tenants!in.pa fic7 Pizza,Hut,be.'41oived to use red lette.'s . , Your t,quest has been denied based ttpan the Foil^kving futciings 1. The center was originally appraved with three major tenants 2.,!� Outpost,Chief.Auto,and Conroy's,Who were given fletdbilit-to usd1heir own'letterstyleanacolor.In 1987,theCity.approved an amendment;to this Unifdrm,:gign Program'ta`allow tithe:3arger•tehOttS or:franchise tchaittS to user -their own letter style;hence;leaving tkte'yellaw color as the key etgme4t bf uniformity. .; 2. There are other nationally known tenants wtttun the center wRo have complied with the yellow:'j letter color,such a>ICentucky.Fried:Clud `n',a*td 7 EIeven 3 The purpose of a Un Ohn Sign`Program is to_crea'te a coordinated sib pragrarti for alIYtenanw% 4- While limited variation is,and.has been,pdrmitted,to allow.greatei flexibility Would detractfrom ' th m , e center. 4. Tenants already have,.the flexibility under;the,prdgram to use their cc p6mte iop-(e.g.-graphic symbol)in conjunction with their name to maintain and promote any atauonally, 1pazed Identity. 'The Iogo can be any symbol 6i color;provided R conforms to;the TA-4itnulll 18 it", teigTit. This.decision is.final unless appealed hi v Hi to the S2cnetary.oi the Planiting Cosrunissian iyithin ten calendar clays from the:date of'this letter.-A,-appeal shall be in ieritutg,togeit�er with the$62 00 appeal fee,and shall state the Ye-easons for the appeal. i5incerely, r i DEV MFM DEPARTMENT , ,u T G IVIS `+ 4 DA COLi+1'/iAN Priridpai Planner ff1 ' , li`tllwml:-silexau+ier 1CKa;1e, j Buqueti{ ry itan�¢r+ stout DeborSh\ Brown Pame:a J lvr ht lacf Ldrtt A1Ct: 1 P } a1 f i' , KODASH, INC. 32%0 WEST CzN""4 .6%xLVAni SUi7E]O7 TCLECOPIEA LOS ANGEW4 GALIFOEtNIA 9PM1 - 'TECEPHonE: (21�)337-2774 42171 213=1069 la00t zz@, 77 ,:., ... ,._ '-, ,'Y dA lf`JC..Dr.ASC►JJ':LACiIB.rl�'u June:11, 3.990. Secretary of th*a Planning, Comviission City of Rancho Cucamonga h C Y > P.O. Box 601 :.!$YOF RdhGHG:.UC�t(ViOPJ�• Rancho Cucamonga,,,, CaligaYn�� i?29 Rea Amendment to Uniform Sign P;�vc_cram Millers, sPoot 11 .an&Archib sid' wtr�����y Rancho Cucamonga, CA, . Dear Secretary: Please accent tIAis .letter as a'written appeal_zto the decision of ,^I Mr. Dan Coleman, .Principal .Planner,..`coiicsrning...our Xequest to 3t' -amend the sign, program.`for' the above feferenced shoppILdg center to allow major tenants •t�+ use red signage:. 'Wd vriginally;`appl d ; for the amendment to acaommoaata Pizza Hut as°thee are identified: nationally with red signage. have reviesoad t}e, Uniform sign Pzlogram frux� he'City o>V Rancho Cucamonga. Pursuant to "Paragraph B..ofthis document,. Our request.. is within the quidelines. Re are reVest'ing'the. addition of only one color. The addition •'of' red signage would apply ta`:Majcsr 1 tenants only. Considering that Hiile 's Outpost, ' Chief Auto Parts and Conroy''.:s have red. signsge,,: we would"not bs 'deviating from an existing. two color, signage theme. Enclosed is a letter from .P tft Huts stating' addii-ional reasons for the approval of this requiest. =°va also enclosed ,otli pertinent docusents for youg refe,.r,ence Ii reviewing thIis mattes, if you should hav®. isri�r '.questione or%iequire adcIitianal } _ information, please contact =*`:, ^Thank.yi, Sincerely, Sabrina Ixmffron, Property hanager SH/kr Enclosures cc :James L: HardyJ t o � , � ' `two w® to C3 i( � � W :•die 6.� '� JIL ot(� ri NOIIrfINar��� �� der �:` _ �� • g _ x' vx Z all ik i 777 llza AC s� -' �.yyn...,��' AIy�M••Tp'.4,••�F♦/M!wM IKI► +�•,IM•/1/��46� p.. r, ,�, !�{s• _ sN�W a oa�y.�a..noe - ..L ll ZDZ t ,irK �` �I� � � j�Cf � r. � a� � ?�.1l93d�i(i S c►'1 � °ada �411 Co FE't .3 1:9ait�tYa � fl '.t'{�+� ._..li .'p�j; ...-,`-'- ., t ,...ak. sc{�i�t�,'t anssa• � ' !•y;{�1 _ , f t` �."- � ' A'v �I��ft.- V I��� tit � i � 'I t •s CITY OF R1�NC§T!j�QUCAMONGA ST�'+FGREMCFA POi}�' DAME August 6, 199(1 Td. Chairman and Members of 6e Planning' Commission' FROM: Bred Buller,, City Planner BY: Beverly-Nissen,. Associate Planner � SUBJECT: RE4ISION TO TREE REMOVA4 PERMIT .B8-12�,�- BCER ARCHITECTS - A revision to an approved- tree remoV0. -hermit Which was associated with Tentative "Tr2ct 'I38£6 yand.. tfanditionat Use Permit 'B8-OI, located at the nq,,thwe'st.corq°r.;;of Base Line Road and Eti►canda Avenue.. APN:. 227-522-0h ^?, 03,, and 04. 'This item has been continued from,tre July 25, 19k, Planning Commission meeting. At that time the Commissfen vriced _ can4ern `over the r' possibility of additional ;trees being removed with` Mto real ,assurance that the project would ever actually be constructed. Staff wat diiicted to provide a Resolution of Denial and a Resolution of Approval in order to give the applicant. additional; time .to complete landscape plans. These plans will be available for `review"by1the fuII Commission on the hearing dace. � Per the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMG Sec.1948.070.E), the Tree ,Removal Permit shall not be effective until ;ssuance,of a build-ing permit. Upon Issuance of the building permit, the Tree Ramoval Permit is valid for 90 days, subject to extension. Therefore, no trees maybe '. -legally removed,until a building ;permit as issued. This provision Is specifically intended to avoid what the Commission fears: tree removal without construction proceeding. To date„ no building permits 'have been, issued for the project. Condition:III reiterates this City ordinance. -` Res, f ly su �ii to C Brad Buller ` City Planner BB:BN:js Attachments: July 25, 1990 Planning Commission Staff Report' Alk Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial " 2I'EM, E tY v ' CITY`C)F RANCHo,CUCAMONG 4.' DATEr July 2 ; "199Lt TO: Chairman 'and Members of tfie .Planning.Commission% t � FROM: Brad"Buller, :City Planner, . . BY: Beverl :Nissen,`Associate Planner..'' $. SUBJECT REVISIO T0."TREf. REMOVAL P-t A1IT 89 11 6CER ARC4v,-'jCTS . eevviian o an approve nee remova'"perm w c ;was_ associated Stith ;TentativteA3xract.13886 and Conditional Use' Permit 88 0 , located a"ti thIe northweW corner ofi Base Line f Read and Etiwanda. Avenue APP-227 5k 01, ,02, 03,=ard 41« 1. BACKGROUND: Tree ` Removal 'Pernii, 88 11 C;was approved ' on epf?m er.. 4, '1088 n assoc atio'n with Cf1P 8a-01 and Tract,13886�. located at the northwest`corner of Rai;4:Line, Road,end Etiatand3 Avenue. The combined proikt included a "mixed us_: ievelopmeft',_ K a consisting .of a6 unit cc�.a.7aminium` project and a : 9,t�09'square foot cor,�nercial .center toi- a-market/drug'' store, btitk.ai�d, retail. use. The Tree .Removal Permit�raquested,the .removal ,:of`only :two mature ;trees, (u e"4412) .Qr Eti�anda AvenaE The removal of:the trees 'was subject'bb. replacement planting as part of the g'ehall ' 'landscaoe site plan. The -.two ..trees.approved 'for removif-,were 1n :in line-with the proposec!�.dr veway, and the.righi turn 5'ane for Etiwanda Avenue, During'tWplan check .process; it, yeas ,noted that an additional''+ 16 trees:were 10 4 d.on-site that were not requested for `reintival'. or" relocation with the original Tree Removal>Permit: �Exh�', it "CI! 1.. Eucalyptus species;: 5 liashingtonia robusta,'`?fI' ingtania filifera (palm), " 2 Cedrus atl.antica 'dcedar), '1 Ailanthus altissima, 3 Schinus molle= (pepper), and i 01atanus racemosa Five.of 'these trees arepr©posed,fQ : elocat Son, (:aT1 are Washingtonia rnb'usta). '., Six are--propased fors removal'=,andl re Zacement;' Pone Eucalyptusjspecies, one ailanthus-altissima-,";trrai;, Cedrus atlantica, one Schithus moli'e, and?one-Platanus "racemasa), Fge are to 'bee preserved <in place, (tvaa Sc inus'moll.e, and 'three ,. 1ashingtonia filifera'). Rancho,Cucamonga'Municipal Code' Section. " a9 08,070e 4.,no�uires: that��'the: revision`'to,-Tree Removal �8-11 oe r•eviereti,;by the full Planning Col trissiar�',, r >.; ltil. :s .7 PLANNING COMMISSION $TAFF'REPORT �� REVISION TO TRP 88- 1 B4E9 ARTH,UECTS., f, ` July;25, 1gg0 :. Page, � f II. ANALYSIS. �An'arboriat's report, (Exhibit,"8") was c,,rnpleted for 12 -ar die:on-site trees :which were:' proposed for relocation and/or;_ removal,. The Ailanthus was, Ieft.;out Hof`the^report since it. ,was. " felt to be a We . ree.' I tea, The report indicated that the W-!s1.1t Agto1.Ma f1.tlifera (#2, 3, 4, 5, 0 art"j:_10) would be`�successful, candidates„for relocation. - 'A sho)Ad be noted `that Tree #10 a; ""pret iously ° approved ;for, ' rm.tdval. Jhe.:remaihi'ng,pal ms (#13 14 and 15) .re to be preserved` i n p'I,ce. The arborist's report indicates the foll'owinq for the Ntnaining trees: Tree #1 Eu'cal jtus Grade changes will ha49 an"adverseFeffect on ree I preserved` o place. . Rath"cal changea,tn irrTgatron will also have,an ad" a impact. _Tree'has{cosmetZc defects. Treks #8 and S 'Cedrus atlanticu: Appear,to be`healthy but have "v s ape eTeccts. ` Trees ;i12 and. 17: Schinus mollec Both 'have structural problems an ear ro ree eras prev!ousll% approved for reiiioval..' 'I Tree #16.Platanus Secemosa: Ma,or bark damage°and parasitic ivy s grow ng aroun enrunk Lies yevithi.n `buildiiig footprint area., It should be noteds that.,the Etiwanda Specir';c Plan -(Figure 5-131 re�u�res a preserva on o e pepper. re es chi nus, mo a „ There are Free pepper, trees oca a on s. e Tree #18 wil': be preserved•i`n'pl ace,.and'Tee 0-t,was pevi ously approved foF" renoval. However, pepper';#ly A; proposed to be removEd because it lies-"within. a`,parki,ng._area. According to the arbarist's report the .t�e proposed foromoval :. is diseased with. heart rot and has.structural proolems. : Since' he tree is dis�,.3�`'� staff could• support the removal of the pepper t , tree contingent "upon replacement 'with thr, largest grown nursery • ;w` 5 stock available. �4 in addition to the above,+'the Apoli'cant s -also requesting that i the .required 'replacement ,trees be. more .in keeping with- the,, ` landscape palette alreatV sel;ected,.-for `the 'pr.'(3ect (�xh bit "E"). Staff could support phis option:`on site; however,; any,thees w relocated along Etiwanda A%*�hue shall be consi sent 25 and 5-25 .of -the Etiwanda Specific .Plan (Exhibits.,'"F" ?here "figures;reiluire that the a isting';peppers beysspplemented, PLANNING. 4i`'.'iTSSION 57AFF REPOR? �f � '� �s .i?EVISIQN 7tt 7RP\ Rt�'-2I BCER ARC"i�I7f:C1'S �� �' duly 26, I4�D Page: 3 with `4pd GU,�, Ee!p4yptus .and that a In of Platanus acerifalia r � ... � CLon�on P1an'e 7�e� add Par�?s 'eldari,ca=;(A{ondell Pin'eZ be locai'ed,� '. �F t behind thevsidewal III.` RECQMt4ENDA7I0N 5taf recommends that the .Planning Gommis, ion a ,e 'rwoval ;and require, reI aj nt of the foilowin sjx ., } trees Eucalyptus spepies (.#l�, _.Alkfithus: a1ti��irrma (�7 74 cedrits atlahtica (#8 and }, I cchinus` of�e:( I7?: and . ' . . racemosa (,fS6} 7fie foi ;owing six trews shalt be ,rat ocated on f f�j site ; Five idashington�a; robusta (#2, 3, 4 "�, and'; fr}, anit one Writ hOonia. filifera\ (#10) The: foilov+it;�t trees sha11 be = preserved.in p1ac twovSchinus cootie: ( 1} ­and 18;} and 'twee N�sirzngtonta fsra ( 33`, 14, a+td 131: r R pectfuly submitted, $rail eul er city\PianiO. " I' Attachments"; r_Atbf t "A'' tkdd Removal 'P)an Exhibitt"$" A"boris "s,Aeporiy ? E},hibit "G" Letter,from,Land ape _Architect daied June tl 7990 , Exhibit "�° Exhibit;5 13 frcih Etiwanda Spe fi6,�Plan ,Exfiibit "E" Letter from landscape Architect dated ' Exhibit F" -Exhib ti 5 251romrXEtiaranda S ecific;;Plan Exhibit .EA,ibfV-5 26 from Et.wan4a Specific It lr< n, -Resb mtian of Approval r a n D i IIII,, Y f r 2f,,y r5 7 r'1�j � / Y `r. -•"--- f�',�i� ft� �if 11� ril lu•..�•7�¢ = 1 ` '�i+w,{ 4..z t . hi�I ,.. ..�•7 .- i.. r.'/il"r i to ;.I � � i L__.t ,;• I 1 ._� � :, .: TV I � 1 0 r 61L•Iflik'[ ROAD 1•- #14 WaSh+n�onia era A(QProVeA '� #I� •`khi�u, nnoll� � wi-fn 'T?P �,�-,�t 1 . `I ITENT- k RA lEA TCTLIr` JEN -filBfT DAVE MUTIAS PLANT&'PEST.CONSULTANT, - AGRICULTURAL&61tNAMI9NTAL U.AKk,1C4 H91 C,.DYk PC.a 31166, pq®op�5t }71131 L #46� _ .. r 8 June 1990 & �I • �i Andrew- Barmakian ? The Barmakian Co: 8560 kineyartl, Suite 51O Rancho Cucam'nga, ,GA "91730 t. On June 4; 1990 J meh'with ,Rog `.- Brayer=,of Randolph Hlebik,' i Associates, Inc. and Chris Baker of i/alley"Crest.Tree Company. 'At the request of Roger.Drayec;i pas asked to`comment.on existing trees at the futurd,site of,�'inei H;c11 a�allage;, wath-one under�.tanding`that thB t,ity_of Ra echo:Cucamonga-desires the ' preservation of,these existing trees. I 'have been asked as a te6 :': z ;- ,hL %t and 5rate licens-d Ju Pest Control Advisor to comt f in5kems i'. General health of' trees. 2: Value of trees based on-.the In ' Soc:iety.of Aboriculture's'viluaaion of " landscape-trees, s. "�; .and-other pi ants, 1488=Edi t:i0n: 3 Transplanting feasibility. 4 Adapt'On to future planhed .landscape- Traiz project, 'bin ' ,.a s located at the 4northweste Avenue IractNo. i388b° corner:Of' Basel ine'Road' and: _tiwanda Parcel Map No; ,11394 located in Rancho Cucamonga': The fol'l�wing is the;inventory that Z have been asked to j comment on. The trees have been. numbered on Cradang,PYan,dated ` November 1988 L ,. TREE Nt,MBER NAME Eucaly-ptus Bpps 2,3,4,5,6,10. ySasfiiPgtnn fil_lfiere Cal;ifornia;Ran:Paan Ced�vs�atianticus Atlas"Cedar 12,17 Schmus'molle Calfarma'�Pepper_ 16' Platanus racemosa Sycamore. GENERAL HEALTH ti Each tree in'the.aboiae group, except palms, has'spr_cifi',c 6robi.em5• that wll'not-adapt in a new landscapeach. tree will be discussed in detail as follows.' x. E6ICALYpTUS r ; t Tree No. 1 a eucalypous - is very large;' est}mated size Ys 100' plus. ,This tree;has externaU.de ects'witti misshapen scaffold ,- and limb dispersement;. (see;;,photosl �stalor-trunk lvourids and scars . that have:poorly Healed have: eft trunk 'unsagwy. Nailed' that aided entry to-atree house:have dama ed 1 B par`as of`,bark. A planned sidewalk skirts this tree-,whicY,,w111 reveal abrformal tzes. Grade changes"to accommodate sidewalk and:'surruuzidit�g landscape area wiFl Save a direct' ,egataVe,,jmpact on:'this tire&. Raduel charges in irr ,gatian;regime to accommodate`new landscapes d.'irectly a#Feet root.systemsand-may lead, -to �.root'rat Tree makes it'very dangerocts in".1,ig�t wip,s'esp'eeially if soil° fs moist from landscapes and'a"diminished toot system-frt�m:rootlrbt Finally, this "tree from its mere size as lout of pace A �AY n ; s sr »q b PALMS. y Trees No. 2, 3, 4, 5;`b,.and 10`would be:good candidates to be � j relocated and utilized elsewhere. S Palm No.. 10,`hbwever, does` have a lower trunk lear and,upperupright trunk....This may "not be desirable.' Transplanjing i5 u'suall,y quit e,successful.with- ' " these palms.. They can acapt to a Car-iety of.landscape:s;ituationS. " No pest problems were obslr,:ved. ' r CEDARS " Two cedar trees, No. 2.and'9, like the:eucalyptus,•are`tdo larq 71 to really fit: into a new landscape situatiote Both=appear. heal.•hy. Both; however,•do possess shape defects that`wouid'•nat .; t desirable. C.le. edar. No. 8 has been topped: , 7h<s is an be consdered ' unnatural shape form for this tree This .trde'has also back wounds," ' (see photo) ' Tree No. has a Very large Side 6ran�h making"--this tree appear to have'_tivc icentral,leaders or a fork. isee. photo) These two tree defeats t4auid devalue.tr,•ees in a''tree appraisal: The natural -form Is"a single trunk."conical in shape: i PEPPERS t Two pepper erees, No. 12,and 17; are being consdered;yo be r 11 elocated ' .on site. Both trees have structural problems..:,Treaylo:: 17 has maior, 'heart rot. tree photo)'' This*,tree is a 'high liab,uity: • Peppers are naturally brittle; as a result during hxah"WindsjGma,tor'',limbs break.; If these breaks are 'not attended'to'7n time,.a h art rat develops an ronsumes the .interiior`structurr@ of iree � t5ee photo): :As' i the c�ase = of Tree No. 17, Tree- No.•18 has-had maior 1i�o cut on the southeast , ti side of this tree. "Heart'rot has became,estabiished. 7t is uncertain how deep Into' the'trunk this,has progressed. Removal of this-scaffold rx: branch would radically alter shape of th sYtrei 'To Complicate-, �• R the problem, this tree` is,growing'amrnedrately ac`aacent to:the curb on Etiwanifa Avenue.' R,Emova`l of, street, curb, anti gutter woEid,have IV to be lane to move thi!F,tree. `Thus excavaEion:would ve a serious impact an,robt s/stem i*,,th`is tree, ,l ,t + 5 � 3 ' �S L Ir Ta , SYC'AMDREB.. , There 3s one sycamore tree; .jvo, 1i.�:'at this site.' Thistree,' toD,",' has ma,i6 bark,.damage - (see,photo), Ivy has parasi,tical'1'y grown ' around the'entire 'trunk .and up'to 40'. plQ'i into the .ae 1i 1 canopy ". of this tree. .Yvy stems eXceed 2: ltt,diameter. ' ?hese Scams hate , ightiy adhered to the sycamore trsip, i.t= is difficult `to dexenmine the damage to trunk and a"i., amage_would".occur in nemav Wh ng svi4 The Trial can�'py is'_hid �ri„fro .ivy growth This—mould in' icate that t:M inter".r branching wou:,d #+aye.aeen stilled d4e'to lack a, sunlight. Thi'S would leave a'skeleton. of a tree'i`ti Shissycamore, �`s " 'Gr also is very !large and would not•,fit prbportianal`i,� Into o��new' , landscape. �� - VALUt tP TREES It is difficult to put t rue 'va"lue on these trees'except palms.. n _Deva'lUation cdhies from beinqovergrowi poor shape, poor•.struc11 ture, ` and.bark defgcmitie3 - There;is-'no`clear4ut measur'ement,to value these trees. Money should not be spent 9n"moving cedar"s,.peppers,. or,syc.�moses. "if these species are,de5i►•ed in"'landscape design sine•should replace"these trees with` hewer,box, material "that meets quality and des;gh "specifications. e( Y Value of trees 'With trunks,greater than:l2 in d ameter is measured at the 4-1/2' level Basic;value is S'cc� UO per square inch crass- sec'iorr of. trupK. Falms areNvalu6d at $25.00 per foot.,'; 4'aluea ore t!� ed on the•fol lowing'c.ri teria� 1. maize', age factor. ' t.argey: old trees have ._. questionable life expectancy especially ' if moved. 2. Physical calliiitions. Deformities, in Shape from what one would iconsider normal fort.. species; structural irtegrityy liability from fatlinq.branches of-tree A,esthetic'value. . b I^ A % TRANOLANTIN.6 FEA5LBIL.ITY - r� 1 Transplanting`old large trees is a quest unab a practice: Old trees have itevelaped! over a lifetime, and ?require a long re-establiehne t`` period.: This'move`drastically sett:,?a tree back if not glareful done and cwred for after move. Great cost; is,inpur�!ed for.movement , of his cal iber of trees. Trees must•be.in .excellent health to successfully survive transplant ehock. Liability is great fortrees;.` with diminished anchor roots: .based an the ibove criteria these trees should not be:relocated because of `size, ago,"physlital' preblems,'pabr; -structure, out of character "in new ;landscaper questldnable life expectancy, and'mastimparti i itat�1"icy;' `['alms .tikansplant'well and are recommended to bE.used at,this.proaect: ADAPTION TQ NEW LANDSCAPE \, Thrse trees have been,in a neglected state for.m4viy years,and'have ~ been forced to'adapt to dnr un-ir.rigated environment . Re-introducing a irrig tion to acco(hrtlodate lawn .and landscape mdteriai 'raould have a. negative impact to an al'feady".dimaged:and.stressed tree.;. These trees' ~°7 are tbv large to blend aesthetically into'a new ;landscape. ',The liability' for treiu falling with diminished` roots, in moist irrigated sail by winds. that are known, to frequent' the`'Cucamonga°area would b'e,-.,I my-opinion, the dniy criteria necessary 'ta e)iifiinate ,the.l'ropbsed movement Of,thee.' i eedar, ,peppers,. ,and ��yacmore r 4 SUMMARY. Cedar :Trees No. @ and 4, Pepper Trees iVa:.12 and'17, Sycamare Tree,No. 16 and Eucalyptus Tree No'. i', because of, size;,;�qe,, defects, { proposed grade change and irri4+37rigrt, are°recommended ta,�be r.emaJed,. Palm Trees No, 2, 3 4,,5, 6;r`and 10 can be'relocated if'desired Money •should be spent;on quality trees that meet.anbiend into c the new;landscape.environment atNWi:nery Hiil Village. rr f , K , tY�IlI .1i Jaa o m o 0 0 r�r yz t E w 0 0 0 0 o c � rs� a�u ✓' �'a Il " r t;^ w N p �- O O f O CJ fJ N.t' -.�j VOY N O :P "n 0. Q 1 m • o ,.00 o` d co' o .o . . pp{{'. poy o. a r , > a:Q.N O ._ p f W WLZN r'r 'w :O ON 2 � N N 2 j:N S I ^ N W CC In 1 .O. mN., m O _ (F O V* IL d a.. C y Iff tj z , * @�r cQi yq csr��F '.LTi vQrf. o� Wo .day y Rxi ti 1 a� �7.c t •r , jIIIiIl , a. .�d♦ ��`a tr ay(F by z� k i '1 4 �A.07 _,yr a' � `.. } ,'� r?c m: ye r�5 •^y i-4a »� .+..7�� �ti.'�"62 � � �-r' .cra .: a l}F �•,� # y`y.'i f M.R"•yy } f -t r�h�4}�"'TY` i ��4 ��•'ti a"�.. '^.� Y4@ 5J j > ol '�� +• �� �i'tr�y 1k � '•�. t 4� t tY t}�'r,� YS��.e.Yf la�'1�I��'�p�t-o.���� }'1-".♦ pt�,Yr-jO� ,�'`. �1141011 ~ 1 y�y S h �!art L4♦�»C�1 �Y, y �'' � � r '','a � �$ L!.. n.� � Y 5 K`►"Y�ti � am "`e 1� e ..y r ✓s. �y.a .f rk �w .t• ji SkS'4� .O w'C 17 Y � R"1�. y'y T h �1r�✓ 'a J + � s R fi y r 1 . iy n - 'a`+y T d .t�i 7 {..k' a' to .1'F � �_ �♦ 7, y7[L i v ♦ H R t l R r w• tee x N f `� R. � .�, t` T �may._ f• 1r,!` *'Y��� 7 t�: a i f i it�•C' r (�'7�'1� `}R•• ►° .` .+`♦ .,t.u� �'}F ar r „ t � ���♦ ` � .9 ate. fi 4�� R tT � :' �x fl?_ a wy,J X ��1 ��. ♦•���t�.�4I e�.�` �.' T'•� � ;ice i«{ �.,." �' i�\s.� ����•1��•�''Va��p s,\i�V *�4ry�r t�+�C;: p +, Wit►*` ; a�i.' l l`� I •�� � � hc-t. u f y ti a „�+. 1y. Y'' i i Vz84�jyt `�t'� 4t� � "'S,'rSGy S + / ■ j''��V�.C*';..7 i�{. �yt'�l E�:; Z��! ,� _�.�Cxaly ,�F,.ht•} i t 't'isr� ��` ++�•' ,f,• ia,�� �iti^+"j k ! t l � I 13 yf' i June 11,1990 t.. Neil Reilly BCERARC IM..CrS 8560'Wineyarcl Avenuc,Sur.0 sil Rancho Cucamonga,CA- 730 :. RE WM FM.L 466 No.$719" Randolph Btib'�c LANDSCAPE bkIA,CH ITE.CTU RE`o PL:ANN..ING i 11' I� Dear Neil: ` The following is'a list of the exisdii�meets an site that.qualify for'relocation or re&ceanent.' f} The exis�,ing tcpti plan has the corresp.�n�duig n►wnbeis to key,die trees:: ;` 4J l� Develtrpment ' Ileeht 4 rdttirfa S? 1. Eucalyptus camaldulensis 460 t T Majar ' Removed ' braitche re s C.d, lrlmmeci '. �vike kj 7nd 2. Washingtonia robusta `stY+° -rampant 3. Washingtonia robusta 27+ T anspiWAt; 4. 'Washingtonia roL-sta 25'+ Transplant - S. Washingtonia robusta i�'± Transplant K 6. Washingtonia robusta Is, 'Transplant,: rl 7 Ailanthus altissima` 25'¢ 2- LVeed free ' Ak6inoved Toppe &. Cedrus deodora 30' - '+ d to + R6 iio.ed& clear w►res Yg lacers 4 a��fike lend i ®ld,C'ry Half • Third Po ucense. 36Tn SeventhsStint; % j}dc,•CalikNa 92501 (77�} �817930� T3evelogment, Ia ga]inea # 9. Cedrus deodnra �1C'.. 20 s Behoved& ; re Tared ut Makind 10. " Wsshingtonia filifera 3tY+ k 'Transplant vriLhin r- parkway r 21. Minusszzoll� ZS^. 2G f "fo ret�taizt 12. Scricrus moue Rernoyed &. x' re laced [ wtke kind' ., . k k 2 . WashingtonfiIifera 85'� To remain 74. Va3hingtonfilifera 4C'k 7arem?ia Washington fllifera 4®'± To remain 25. 3alataz►us raceazosa 35'+ Remoyeii,4t C replaced' ur/'hkel nd, ' 27, Schiiias mo la '��3=ov d `1 t rot& l rtr �: iateii j w>ika mind 28. Schilns Mo. a 'Fo remain _ td~ All other trees nrz sib fsdt betovrxt o rPpI ze ment qualif:^-Ation. T tr devalbpipant status i nc2tihns eoiutnn is l;er RHNs ar,I CE:t's recomme s dismsed v✓itaa ftverly,the tries inay be Seater 5 rssa& There is r•� �c2ca ztee that the Mds v1i transplant succa�sfully,Y_-xC(pt.fcr tYte,t Dais,dt:z t�the ai2t vaal,rocky soil, The ' � cost u replace with Nke sized't�ea�z�40uld r1siinto the 3e�n of thousands df dalldFs: We snap est that Dme Matias be retain 4,n,as an arhori Lt, to evaluate the'cOlMition and, ` value cGri the tress. lf` , i. .pf`d dd iCEtaSLiJ�}� 367 aQwenth 806t,'�Riv�rtidr, CaliEczrnia 9x� 2 (7 � $1193t� Tr i f -y 4 >{J tl 1" 5 t ' i io it+STREE, F J � ` Offva Greve a,r cis?` IV ij if �IPANK.I—Rt��� e�oe �- : !✓ VE'. as VA a ��eIS 11'L4s7 cZTRiE 1 i till. TO. BEIPRE { , �YISt1fig.WindbreA' �t f AM.cDt AVE ' affix o re 06t0'0®! vd true ti { 'gal PRESEAVAT rE NONA Y 1' h �QRrtq Apr p^'l ; l Ju:�z 13,1S;v' `siUN 1� �`s Beverly.Nissin CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMbj%A ( t . 916.1 Baselina Read 1 Rancho Cucamonga,CA Qi7lo r: t , RE: VnNBRY,HILT: JOB NO.87193 Rol ` ` `LANDS CAPE,.:ARC.HIT'ECTL ;KH o'PLANNING. n;• Dcar Beverly, Currently our mridscapuig plans for the Vl�inery" Hill project show replacements of +„ like kind t*hc species for all,existin;�trees bung remored on.the site. 'J1&W6Ver,.,in our professional.opinion, based;on the=plant palette, it# ould be in muzh better:keeping PW-�,.; } thet-ally with the desiggt�r9ntent if as zn alternative we v✓er'e to up'size several afcen,.t trees' of the original plantpalette as a replacement far,treks removed: If this can be discussed further plekie ct ntactour office. Cordially, RANDOLPH HLUBIIG ASSOCIATES;iFidC. ; S4 . David A.Breznick cc: Dan Coleman Brad Bollar XH Of Old GtyF-I11 ®-Third,Fla�r,,, ® LtWik #1$12 $ _ .titer 361� Seventh Sfreet�R.iverstcle, �alifomia 92501 , (714) 7>311�17 330 , h` + 4�- + 11� ia9 24 `nsaA` 0 < rbs maul,« SFr' $4B`cwl,'(aujrb we�[i f t� 5,y x• 6e/��,q�pp��L�"+.qq//�� Apiyx�, � sde:.teiseFsac;�t; E i 8�,„1�1E:1ly AVENUE ^cRutred NOrth,of tlaSelloe l South ot- P, � 4 -26 y a ,:,.� ,CITYOF A t .. N Sc.L� ;; E:�4 MT, t t 1r } r`.orrrrII) anrIr1S5 � �� f �� MW IZN 4. adl.o3 ...• t I,7 J} gt�WAIK Or''+rat �" "° 3�c� gross src:ton t'w var es a_ It anciopt for, ETIWANDA AVENUE f Piantino 8aui eiet" '� SEreettrees(in le �H.,, RoW7=cer_,�rc�,,-�<;�rs FrorrE y�rr!{tees:infnrma[mix tybe G¢D:(London P(attG,�Mot�c�{I :'incJ, �x'`� 1'�ree, min./2o'or {ronta�¢ 25Z OP tre.t t h64,- z4"Bo�1 size all 47,ih�rtrees ska4{be is a},min , Proni yarG iareisca in--akall be 54 lem�nted b art* na�'s�iru c�rou:�drover �P Y Ax R ;J RESQ UT N0 A USOLUTION 0 'THE `PLANNING` -'W RANCHO CUWONGA.s 'CAIIPORNIA, APPROVING­ THE REVISION sj, TREE - n _ REMOVAL: PERMIT ZDdATED WITH"r�0tti�It�iONAC '-'USE ` PERMIT` 88-0 ANR TENTA?,IVEr2ACt ,I3686, LOCATEB AT 3HE NOP-TkEST, CORNER=OF,EriWANDA.AVEN�!E AND BASE LYNE r RN0 PtAKIN& FINDINGS'IN SUPPORT i,HEREOF 02, 63' AtYO 04 A. Recitals. (i} BCER Architect .has fled an appiTcai;ron for the _vision of .Tree Removal Permit ea I1 ;as des.cr�bed _Tn the title o'f' th'7s Resolution. .einafter.-in .this Resolution,>�the subject rev soon l;s�eferred to�as,.P"`the application." 0n July 25 and cone raved to Au'Oust 8, 1990, the Plsnnang- C©rrfiSsion o,f.�the City of"Rancho. :Cucrtmon'ga rwducted.a ,duly--,noticed pubi'ic. hearing on the'applicat�oa, x" :,, �r All legal orerequisites prtQr to the adoption of this P.esolut`kan � have occurrad, B. Resolution. y.: ' NOW. 'THEREFORE-, �t,:�i� hereby €ound, detertn�rrd,, an �resolved by the Planning Conrission�,of th,° City-of handhq Cu'amaitga as ;failawsr_; J 1. This Commzssio-a hereby�specifical,ly,: to s� -that a21 of;the acts` set forth in the'Recitali, Part'A '.ef this'Aesolutior''are'true and correct... ' 2., Based upon sbbstantial evidence presented -to this Commissidn during the above-referenCgd'pubtic hear ings OR, Ju .25..and`A>xgust:;;8, I99O includ,ng written and;oral staff reports, together -ith'publzc,testimony, fihi`s,. Co=tssion hereb y spec�fical',,y' find's-as foXlows: (`a} The 'application' *appljes to property locAted at ifz nort�west cornar of Base Line Road t6d Etivrdoda :Avenue With,,a=street fiontage of 637 feefi along Base Line Road: and 634 feet along 'Etiwanda Avenue a,& vacant, and +k (b� A.mixed_vse'deyelaproent project has 'been ,ppraved for,the; subject`site. (6) the propasetl revvtjon to Tree hmoy,l Pe1�n�t 8$ 11 wvth conditions is consistent with Rancho Cucamonga: Code:-►hapter 19.0$ >(Tree Preservation Ordinance). - d} The prnpcsed" rewtsaon,' to Tree Removal Peri1t $B6II with ;Condi¢iEns as;<c�riNiste,�t ti'ith `the Etiwanda ,$pecifis Ptan,, spar"titularly ,.. - Figures 5 �s, 5:25 and`5=26) .1 posr. PLANNINB COMMISSIOI RESOLUTION N0. .e REVISION TO TRF=B{� I1.- BGER-itRCHTTECTS � Aygust 8, 1990 _ Page.2 i4 3 Based upon -the'substantial evidence presented to this Connisi'i on U during the above referenced�Ub' id",heieingz and. upon" the:specific .fi ridings"of, facts set forth'•:in paragraphs 1 an`''4{2 above, this, Comicission hereby-rinds:and concludes as-follows: ��>w r' O That the proposed er visionito'Tree Removal Permit 88 11 is in accord with the '6en-eral`Plan, t11q objectives of the-Etiwanda.,Specific Plabi ' and the;Purposes -of:the .district inwhich the site.is located. (b) That,-the proposed revision, together:, with 'the conditions applicable thereto, wi_11- not be detrTme-ttal to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to.:properti;es or improvements in:the v ctinity; (c) That the "proposd revision complies with each of. the PP F tisions.,of the EtiNand'a 5peci;fic=Plan a licable rr µ 4: ., Based upon the-findings and 'conclusions 'set forth i0 para:' a _hs �. 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approvesthe revision' su�,7ect­.to each and every;,condition set",fortti.below: r !. The fo.Towing 'six trees 'shall be-�transp7anted on ,, s W ashn to ia'rob s"t n u a' 2 5 'd.:, g, � #3,, #S. � � ap .#6 and WashinStonia filifera #I0 i 2. The'.following :trees ,sfi fV be+ preserved, n place S.chin�us :mode 418 and Washisgtonia ,filifera 013, #14, ,and 115. p 'f +• ,•3s 3 All • trees ta' be preserved in ;gtace0,` shall be protected during grading ands,.onstruction' per Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.' „section; {i 19.08:11fi Protection..' shall be. ' 'accompl fished ;prior. to construction being commenced }� 4. Schinis molle 417, shall be replaced with a 96 inch box "Scfiinus mr:lle ,and steal`] be, ,located some�rh r'e F along ttte Etiwanda Avenue frontage ;The pre'gsse r;� S location,shall :bedateranioed fir,"the landscape plan' S. Eucalyptus ,species,-I! sh0.1 b- replated"With •one, i:- , 15-gallon Eucalyptus macu1ata (�potted,Gum ,. 6. A lanth,jc ai,issima 07,'shall.` be"'replacea with `Coe " ,r :r }j ;24-1nCh'o'`.Y.,Lreee. The:species may:be•chosen'byr,the x'E r ir. applica-nt to• better:' fit : in. ,t416,.the" prop`or ed landscape plan '-, r 7 :,edrus utlahi cca #6 and #9sha11 ire replrced wtth 9 two g6 inch boz'trees The, s s'ecies raay be Shosen.by f the app,zcknt ;to better fit: In with. the proposed f , h landscape pith q PLANNING' COMMIS5I0N�RE.SJI`iITT0N rN ' 1 , REVISION TO TRP`88 11 - BCER AR(; ITECT5 ` ' August 8, 1-990 � 'Page 3 . l eplaced th8 atanus mai wi a ;96-inch box tree' 'ies maybe thosen by tie x devel,ope vtd ,Ktter;`fit ' in wit'- the proposed landscape plan, 9. All replacement trees, relocated t^ees; and . a' `p_res'ervea trees shall-`be 04rly �eltnea 'd-on the .ur landscape plate:=whtch •hall tia reviewed .•red approved by the City Planner_prior, to the 'ilizttce;of any Cradirg;or Building-RarmltS.- 10. 'Relocation of existing,,,trees; and r.eplarlttng of,the 9.6-inc� ,bak, Schinus'malle shall be;superv"ysed by a qualified arbortS f ,r 11 The approval &V this revision to 'free Relly Permit 88-i1, shah not become "reffeciivet until. building + permits a .,.,issued for ,,Conditional Use . Permit 88-01. Na, trees shall b7 .removed, or transplanted > L until building,`pe`rinits,are issued ji 5." Tha Secretary-ta this Commission shall ,dert�fy to the adoption of this Resolution. o ..*S AP.RDVE0�Aj D ,'ADOPTED TN-, 8TN-DAY OP.AUGUST 1990. ' PLANNING COM1MI55I0N THE CITY 4- i211tJCNO C��CAMOFtGA �1. BY: Larry T. MlcNiel, Chairma[ ATTEST: a Brad cul ler# Secretary Brad Buller: Secreta�'ry of the Planning Commission of the `City of Rancho t ` Cucamonga; do ; hereby'- ^ertify that ,the T"oregoingi Resolution'•was.- duly ap , regularly introduced,-sassed, and�'adpoted by. the Plannin.g ComMssion of,-bhe City of Rancho,Cuc'- oni,a; at:a rc.g.Ar:meettng.o the Plannina,Commi`ssi�n het }4 � on the 8th day,of August 199U, by tf;e .fallpwi'ng vote to :fait AYES: COMMISSIMERS: w' 4 3 I� HOES: COM'rIISSIOtvERS r. v it C1 ABSEMIT: t,OM1iISSIONER5: 4x Y,-7 ' ` f a.` RE50LUTIDA-N0. A 9ESO4UTION 'flF; THE PLANNING COMMISSIO(1 ' flF RANCHO I: CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNFA; DENYING THE .REVISION ;TO., TREE =. REMOVAL PERMIT. '88=11 `ASSC IATEQ; 1dITH CON1bITI0NAL ".4,SE #' PERMIT. U8 1 AtVD TENTATIVE TRAGf. 13886"LOCATEO';AT THE. NORTHAST CORNER' OF ETIYIANQA AVENUE,AND,`WA .',LINE ROAF}, ANQ !�lA�CING FII, ING&:IN SUl�PORT,THEREOF -'APN O2, 03'AND A-. Recitals. (3) SCER Architects Itzs .filed an appl,icatfdo for the. -re'Visiar, of Tree Removal Permit 88 iz'. as described in the title o " this Resolatiun:` Hereinafter in tiii.s Resolution, .the subject revision ;is referred 'to :«s, "the application." (ii) On the iuly� and contiaueu to':August 8,`1990 the °Planning Commission of`;the City of Rancho,. ucamanga conducted a duly noticed public hearing°an Vie application. (iti) .All legal �prereuuisi,tes prior to the adoption of this.,Resol Won have occurred.,' a Resolution. k - F:Cia', fiMEREFO?E, nere': f�:t,�u, .:ens„�in ,<" and rpsal ved by the annitig Cbmsnission of the City of Rancho�Gocamonga as fol10 s: 1. This Commission hereb;� tpecificaliy,finds that �e1 of she_facts, 7 sat forth in the Recitai:s, Pert A, of this Resolution are.t rue'.WIt iNwt,'ect. 2. Oased upon:.sub'stanti0; evidence presented to this Conemission during the above-refemh� ed public"hearings'cn.July 2L 'and August & 1990, including, written and Viral staff reports, together;with public testimony, this ; C'ottmissi`on hereby specifically, finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property . lowated at the 5 northwest corner of �Sase l the Road and EtinanL'a.Avenue �vii,i� a ,street frontage Of" 637 feet along 8a$e`i,ine Road`and '634'feet al ong Etiiianda 'Avenue and, is vacant;,ard, ; ` ,(b} A mixed use development Fro�ect has been approved:for, the subject site., ` (c) Two trees have already been 'removed fYVin the site,without '< the proper approval of the revised free Ranoval Permit. '= ' (d) ,.R6mi)vaT of any additicaal trees of this,,tfmt is:p"rencature W> t since there is'somie uncertainty As to v1he�♦er,or not the prkieRic will be,built5 a� prapo"sed. 3 (a 4 \ °-0 PLANNING;t:0► 'ISSfON R64u rr1ON 41U 'REVISION''T RRP 86 LI BCER ARC LTECT& page z 3 Bm20�pe�rythe ub1tant9al exic?n�ic Ares nte#[ to-this C -ssicn j during' tie- above-riferencdd public hearing and upon thee' eaifit findings afr :l 1 ' = facts.,set forth.in paragraph . 1 and 2 above;"this C4ttrrtissiF `hereb €finds artd;' concludes as Folia�►s �� r tad That the_+roposed:revis on a `f„ee to ovj 1 Peftit, 88 Li is not in accord with,the Genetal PSan', the ona tixes of the Et rtanda -Specfic J Pi an, aad'the puap ses of tKe diw 4« tin'7r ieK tl a site 4ocated (b) That the ry usedroo}h�..,., �:a, yh` s^ ft F� , ca,, er (Ond3t7L1�>` i` appTl i cable tliere�O, l� �;'• ~�?«.:;w 1',` o zne`^ub i o; heal tls, , �af2ty, Ws3 a c C-.� rz2er$az°`Yfi;jttriOttS t�!'�CQpeC ties ar'-"�{iPrrQf�eiTintS tn: �te Wicitti.ty..` °` ; tcj TF%ai the proposed vis,on dpeJ'not 3 ca 7y wi; K eachoF theL. mp agglicabTe provisions of 04 EtiwandA M,pecif�� Plan 4. Based upon #Ke findings and co:�lusions set forth in paragraphs 1 z, and 3 above, tni t, Commission hereby denims tt a'ievi Sion. 5.. Tfie-Secretary,tq this .Oa�+nission,-shall c�ertYfy ta�the denial of this Resolution. EL, \t lF! pa DENIED'i'rfTS 8lH DRY OF AUGUST 1990 1� PLANNING COMISSION OF THE`CITY OF RANCHO GUCAM0 1 E By f` Larry. ►� .cHi e , ,a tin ATTEST: rdff Bun er Secret4ry ;. I, Brad:Buller, Secr��iiary- of the Plinning� Commission, of t e City of; Rancho Cucamonga; ,do hereby' certi y that the faragoing :Ritol WZI0 T=.,As ;dulyr andu regularly introduced- ,pas�4,d and Adopted/"y the puini;n Eo issf,oii"of theCit o ththefStKnchb.Lday o€cAagist,,ly Qa jr Mtn farltiwtm`voteeto1wftanig'W t, �riss�ia held AYES: COMMISSIONEAS: NOES: GOWIS3lONERS:s T� ABSENT: Ct1MISSTONERS: l U WA "!✓ITY OF.RANCHO CUCZaMONGA REP OF AF AXI DATE:' August 8, 1990" �• TQ '_'hairman�and Member of'the Planning Commtssicn, e fRI Mt Brad Sul'ier, City Planner" s _z M. Brett Horner, Associate,e Planner SUBJECT: ENVIR"ONMENTAL ASSESSMEMT AND"TENTATI�YE TRACT 13859" LNTs � � . HOMES The development "'of 393 dwelling Funits qn 11.§ - F acres f t�aad in, the' High, a idcr,tial District. (24=30 d,ivelling� units per acre}, located�Within the°Terra •Vista Planned-Cammunity. on th'e northwest�corner•,o'f,,Spj•uc.e A:ventie r and Churcn" Street APN• 1QT7. 421-.11 and:18. . (Cont�nced} "• . from July .11; 90.)' I PROJECT.STATUS: This item is scheduled to be hear -at the ComMiss a,ia snocia:l" e workshop' 'on, July, 31 t'1?GO and i was contnued to tonigG,t�'S meeting for final approval, " Since. A 'written, report' was.; ,not, avajljble prior to ' tbni§ht's, meeting,,'staff will'"present the report ..a;id recommendations orally. A revised;'�R•asolutionv of Approval" w H a1.so',�e made 'available tonight basad.4pon the Workshop. Respect lly submitt d, • Brad Bul r \ City P1 nner r BB:BH,+ifs - Attachments: Exhibit "A" - June 13, 1990 .Staff Report.`; r ITEM E" CITY OF 1ZrLNGIt3=C L`C,AMQi!tGA era REPORT <<. DATE: June'.13, 1990 t r J T0: Chaiman'and Memoer$ of tliePlanning Corrmitss�(orr FROM: Brad ai►11er., City 'canner `-� ;v� I� BY: arett Horner, Associate• Plahner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO TENTATIVE`TRACT 23dSg' s LEAIS R' HDY The development of '393 dwe ling units- u 8 acres of land', "in' the HigK iesidential District (24-10 z dwelling units,per acre),`' located with 'in the Terra Visa Planned CoW:nun#ty on the northwest corner.of Saxuce Avenue and.Church hunch Street - APN: ,W7-01-11 and 18. s f,. S. FROOECT,AND SITE DESCRIPTION:' A. Action Revs tested:_` , Approval of the sn�d%xision..siapY and issuance of a"Negative Declaration, approvai.•of,4j6 tonctpt0a1 plot- plan, grading pjdn.. .Iodscape, plan, and �; ld7ng elevations:. B. Pr,,o3ett Density: '24,9 dwe71ing'on:its per acre. C. Surwnundiina Land Use and Toning_ fy North - Apartments and ,Pa„ 's Medium,.High Residential,(14,2;4- dwelling units per acre).: w South - Vacant-,#,a!<,Res idential (24,�30'dweTting utUts acre) (Z' P East Vacant,= ed�+ahi-Higic Residential !tA 24 dwel'Itng / units per acre) West Eus_inpss=::Park; Office professional, s� D. General Plan Desianat„onst Project Site ,- High Rdsid.ential 1 �� North Medium Residential. South 0fficQ { '. East - Medium Residentia41 is test High Residential it E. Site,-Characteristics: The'site is presently racant',J, 11 sohoe -remnant "grapevine vegetation The site.slopes aP�r..os't;�ately perc6t from 4orth,to south { a r Le A� ` v PLANNING Ct'MUISSION STAFF. REPOR0 FA & TT 1:38W9` - LEWIS HOMES June 13, 19g: '° Page 2 .� II'. ANALYSIS_: .x; A. .General: . Lewis omes proposes t develop>the site witK six 6 building types:. A major�ty`ok, thesf, (4 of the 6 building types) are,thrde-ztory with :th'e homes;..lbca�.ted `above ground level with enelosed, garages. There are two recireati'on areas}°4 , with its own- re creatiod' bu7Tla"ink, poohr and spa. A. sports coact, open play area, . and Targp, tat l.ot is alao 'Proposed.' rr" S. Design Review Canaiiittept the CnttRRittee eYielted'tTre pro ee on October 5, -1989 Mei, Weinbn ril 5b,erI9,7uaE, �er ,ger,`Goldman?, and agafn'on p1989 (McNiel: Wein ,. ;(McY:iel, Weinberger, +COlEman).; The' Committee recommended" approval of.the prg$ect.sui,3ectao tide frllo ng con,I ns I. ' Additional landscaping�"F should: be pr6videt�� .between. the pool on Lot A and Buildtng 1, and between,Rpildinq,2q and. the walk and parking space 'to,the south.' =¢ STAFF COMMENT: the revisions have f6een made, on t:.e final plans, 2. The interior. of the aluminum channel should Jbe.'painted the buildin3 'color and-'perhaps widened .to creme a more visible shadow line.,, l� s STr9FP COMNEfft! This has been ,ma��s, Condition tR The t ' channel is 3/4 inch wide and, was=�appeoued for use' bu the nitte; Ifter• review flf>' 1 photos sut.nitted�e;,JthOaRali can t • C. Technical. Rev t;w Committee ` The 'Committee, reVi:ewed the project and determifiad that with the reclmmended Conditions;.of Approval, the project IS - consistent with . all appTI,cable' standards ate ordi:nancet. � 0. Envirortn, .fjF, Assessment: Part I H of_the ,,initial I ur;y has been`'c9 p e ed by the appl scant'=.` •part,''II of.the Envfronmental , Checklist, comp`,eted by staff, fount( that.althojgh tb�pro ect` may :h6 �; significant, effect;=,Ahe `enviivnment. Vo try ` not be a significant effect in this cdse because' the mitigatibr measures identifi,_, n the' lnitf: Study;Ela 2"fee - added to the project apnrl`rai, T. Noise: The,: peoJect is,, subiect to s#6,Alfir nt Noise impacls "__Jong' Street, and Spruca ienue . ; A n 'pr I eitiRdnawy icgdstical si dy has been prepa_d wbich c 1 MIN M1} � 01 } PLANNING dOMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA'& TT:13859 June 13,. 1990 Page 37 adentiiies mrtigation,'mea'sures {sound Barr-iersl neededto r bring' the site " into ,conformance with city noise standards A �ou'sti'cal rep ort'wi. l be.submitted (Condition No- 41 to identify precise measuves.Which must 4 beincoporated intol:the fi�lat projact°design , , ' 2. ,, Schools;. Or June `.7, 1989, ",the Clty ;Gouncl adopted Urgency';Ordinance Nei 395;°wh,ich establishes a 'po icy lo;r, a- cond ti'on ao,: be placed' on' ai^7 „pending residential pro�e4ts to ensure , adequate school oapacity , 'Thi's condition has.`beea added as Plann Planning'-piyision .Conditionr No-.;1 off the:TentativenTract- Resolut ion'`q:f:Appi+oyal T:II "ACTS 'FOR FINDINGS ' .The ,protect. is cons'i.stent �wzth. .the Terra Vista Planned Gommuniay,and•-':the;.General. Plan' ''The pr�oj;ect,wil , "} not,,be detrimental to, adjacent `proper'ties> or cause siQmfican,t e environmental impacts.' In '-additigr, the, proposed .use--i s" in compliance with the applicable provisions ofN.' -Terra Vista Community , an,,tne Development Code, acid City Standards.; IV CORRESPOND ENCEc Thi's,„ item has been advertised,- iti The ,Inland• Valley Daily BUTletin�newspaper as a public hearl nn The;;property �- has been pasted' and n: es were sent to- '•ail 'property o1! fit^� r, ,dr within 300 feet:of the project site. V. RECOMP7ENDATION S9aff recommends that the Planning Cammi'ssiou approve Teritative� Tract, 19859, 'subject to the- Condi_t� in ,,,Qf Approval,. through . adoption of the attached psoluti'on arid,. issuapce Aof a,Negative ,Oeclaraion. _+Lt P��•s tfu y su e Bead 1` l a City Pla er 88:BFi j.fs Attachments: Exhibit "A".- Location Map Exhibit "B" - SubdivAsIon'Map Exhibit "C Site 'Pian Exhi it_I"Ell - LandScaFe Plan '? Exhib'' "E" Grading Plan Exhibi.t""F" -:Su,ilding'Elevations a Y' „ Resolution of.-Approla�l with.Conditions Resolution of.Approval for`Design°Review" itt� Colditions �­�7 n,. r �t `*. ul 7 i C A N, trAesa0.Yn 1 r�agnp . f t �; s�neTsiah� i� Iaa4i• y, SFr7. if — �T{serer.anoraat t �r-v l� 4b lLhaMIalea TipC7 r0 /afU 7 I+'Baia tk` 17, (aaeeea i /�Q'zr lfiY'fJf ��7� •_... I a t "u6oaH^` ta°pclek*" t,i 1s �vm,ervg9� �;`"� �•�` ,1 !� �-�: .:. .S e..o fie.; 'IJr t y,��'{{t{�� . TE. I as auif� f. L nnc4 nv.eano ,� . 'rsL Issas ncu vsnasoan camm u� l� .< -�"`�-. r r tounr _ as CL1Y. OF , LJCAIVLONGA PLAN�N�'F3 STON� �� w mar scar -plan a � j\� 7 � r . u To 4 � IT /• 15 T{ ` 4 IT n I a •f <' 'l F r F• �5r � ''1 t� i� M t 4 fryxf \a�� •Y* �< u f � i t F I p ffNCATIVE JRAcr MAP ° �r ENTAP IVF TRACT NO. , i'3659 �' V$ THE CITT OF RANCHO.CUCAKMA C(XNf7 OF.SAN URNARDINQ..CALIFORNIA A\ \• ." ! v ate, 4� #••,�, 5 'APRL 1fiF"'- t4,i ACrTFS.GR055 •-•'5 NLWWRED LOTS „Y 393 UNIT$ I5.8 ACRES NET. 2 LETTERED LOTS ITEM � � " fi CI Y ,•C3F :R�41iTC HO C CPMo IG TITLE 'SU �VI�a'OJ� 1 sI�P y 11j ; I' 1�TNIIVG I3I�TIS t7N t : _ EXIT SCA !'d0i7� . rnrs ro -'•� H ft'1 qyf`j l � P A }R �j, i,'' V1e �� � • �O�y r t \t ti\ - NV vvvvvXN toy \� IQ, I! N!'A 1-1 A (RAC I NO �yv4 ms r i IN��<1 rrr to MAIiI'U LILNtMi Ciuvn a�dw ni nwHoikr.cw r�ururt� _ �� ,q�� w.�L J �. �_ AVfi.t090 19.1 ACRES GRASS'IS 0 ACRES IIET'Z97 WIT( 5 tA.M.EREO LOTS TEWT LOTS 2 LET ' C lWCL1tY1V1`1GA � �.1�.��� ,.:�_� ! ��; EXIi�Tf �.✓ $GALE:j/)lrl�s .... 1 t c i iI z� .. 'Qapl. sj • ;. \ c1 I f LAND§QM LECs W 1'- RtO.t:GY n. n TM si'+trr.�..°r:Sea�`ts �v' �,Ip.�b r� J' •1. (1 a cat.Mt ,`M \`:. ¢ f°f-. °�. t- •11 .; ot,awasa-nasxaftq i j .r'�f.EYiRiEI.J.'EY SMCE' tau�E[d ~�~'�`�� •`�. `}~ ,♦ / // q"E•'eRAi►1 LM � •�. T. l -�{� oE1zwETER EoGE 1•M'. .a A aO9�YAa 4MtIf�] ?t 04.•'tt\f iq t?u.:R'.JM'>��4'4f - e C 0F •' } � UCLUYIQI GAPLAN r�\ . ION: �iii.c OO��tiVJ �K k�_ EXHIBIT; fp SCALE; �$?� � � �" y..� rr u' '✓rr. oA JJJvvv-"'rs t ' i Y it v\��`��:Y��. �ti \ •vim r F 1 1 v� � -Amil -\ y,. •t � �' � �- I� (�� 21. 14 _ v V t\A�•v y4 �q� �f' .P�'ll 4 . r rrE CITY OF' UCAPJIC)NCaA 3TTf E PI ANI I 4 19 SION EXHI T SCAIE �1ph ;f } o rT i �> t. \i�i L `q, `1 •�k � o O �..� G b � Aft k r 3 � 1 r �ff i 4 1 h '�w� �• IL i L ! 17 c r s d `l Z `+ �e ri mail i t ^` mama 5,.. i7 i f--� S t ■ ■ `s ■ J� t 'y ! vv tat, r' Ht N 10 r "1 - t �`` t-� � `�� ►��IIIIIIIIIIIII a z f 0. V _ 71 e, fir; a `.w�s�i(' � • r /' .YI •`, 1 �/ ��+I„'.. rah` f.a � ���! � .� "`�`i= .vl•7 "per L . , F 77 � I Tam -Oft Lc -77 c i; .f r rr t m �c1 � r< LLL MlM • i.A, P� 11 t fi ty, M Tpt x xlo AII t W. p r_ Iits` Vz Nll =r i►l(Ifi({Il((((i 1 1)•�1� � - E 4F \A d ♦ '�y k i vrl �RaR�Va; �wr Bata• 3 pia it-�A�sn �f E era ,w �4 a iti. 1 y t a., ,r UL Cl ,. . :a uj Q! !IL 3 9 A A ul W r � r 71 RA/ nf- CITY;0F RANCHO cUCAMON6A PLANNING .CQMMISSIUN MSNUTE5 Adjourned Meeting i q Juty.31,, IQ9D- Tertati.Ve Tract 1385? tChairman' NcNiel cal.leu this per-1on �` tiCi3 meeting to' order';.at 6 !0 p mP' N (iiinutes from the Regional Mall.Workshop"have,been.separately prepared:)r The meeting was held at 'the.'Civ�c Centter, '.10500 '`Cwf&•,.,Center,.:DrivP,j Rancho: Cucamonga, Calffiornia, 91730 The purpose cf ;the meeting «!as to ";resol"'v6 ' design, i.asues„for Tentative'. Tract. 13859 'which`wiere��raised.,`as-the, _�regul;ar�: ;mre�iag of.June,.13, 19.90. EOLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: S�caanne'. Ghi'c�ea, Lar�yF 'McNie1, Peter.. Tolstay �F ABSENT: �• getsy- 46inberge:; John M2icher STAFF PRESENT: Brad Bull er, k City >i??.nnew; Bred Horner•," Associate r ?Tanner' Brett Nor.,ner, Associate Planner, introduced the.design'=issues,'raised. by..the Commission on June 13'. 5490t and invited;,the applicapt to respond: fio •the. issues, Gary Gregson,, CYP Archi"tecturei ann ng, briefi� responded t�'tF�e Commission°s concerns.' The Commission reviewed the rev�s�ld plans `;and rec:mmerided the following changes: !. Am arched window tram plene• should be'edded`A-al ong t5e top Qf a71 windows where suffic ent space available::, 'The 'arch Is, be consistent with those abovd thi,stair,wel'ls and-,balcon`ies, 2. A sill trim piece should be added at the bottom of the openings ,on r� the lval°ls enclsi,ng the siairaells The design details should be reviewed and approved by the City Planner.. 1he,,siit trim should also be used on the' balcony walls.below the >Eietal rail ng 3. The the inset design should t;e,changi d to a differentrletail such as a foam medallion (Wit stucco .over);' stone iriece', or, szmtlar deCaila The City, Planner° should. review,and approve the''final desfgno 4. The compact• stal is an site.shouid:•be revised .9n some ,areas to,,orovi�e ,-4 F a more balanced distribution and,to maxia �e. Landscape+;area 5. The metal channel detail•should :<'be pal nted,'to match the .,!prlmairy stucco 'Color. f s r a fi r FOR- ED' Stu U,y i; zsQ,SES NLV ' 6 The .mai,� recreation wilding sh�ili+l reti.rrt for f ',al D`bsign.Rev ew Gom�nittee approval The crcu'�r`totier element' shaul.d be retained, -an .overhead t ilis or the ,roof,el'ement�should.�extend'further.'along?a the 71.aht1de_of t�e Ynn1 =-id cieY4t tVI1, and,1 rlilPt!1��,chLLi1' ba prf34F,ided, betWe. tt�e To ia'"y^c r"itt1510Ws"OT1't�A ri''ght Side eleVdttOR the -.�ommissi'on djrectied the a4 ? can to .upgrade ;and 'ardhi'tectural l the ;enure x rgdt hard' side ;of , the poa7 sloe: elevation i ti ADJOUMPENT i The Commission adjourned fihe meeting at 7;25 P:M: Respectfully submitteds+' Brad Buller Secretary { YS - 11 . z, S t �I 3 4 f 5 I �~ f ( ` !D 1 a S 4}Y 44 P OArfing Lammi bior Minutes 2 :1 JUT y'��t„L99Q r �' Sf E• e t t _ a .1. 7-7 IL XL 'rr L L i t p w .y. a t A i s 777 _ it S 1 tv gllllnll �� I 1 i y t °TERRA,' VISTA' ''RACY NO.-, .......... �i '' Ranches,Ci��mo g , alu or is F � LpwlS.t�oma4 '` r �GAL� lid:=•i� �� �{ �J�,'}y � � � �, `�Z -r i� �,l I UMIwum a rTH TL__ ll' � �,%TUQ� �rf v L F � ,� l4 v TE RA- iS A f� ts�hI;k Cupartrtoet$MkEFRO' T TA ��� Cataf .f. ,zl 5' i{r4titu.S G Fa 'S 47 ,t Cc �93 �r rr9 Co) LU Fa o r ? FaCC c" � jj rs '� �tiT✓rf Lu Im t l r. �'y 44 '.�d� '►V- V+. A a RESOLUTION NO.. 'k RESOLUTION'- OF THE�PLANHING COMMISSION OF I jkE.CITY OF RANCHd CUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA,, APPROVING TERTATIUE "TRACT : +. s, MAP NO.'13859,: LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST,CORNER"OF SPRUCE `r AVENUE ANV tWRCH STREET 'VITHIN"THE TERRA` VISTA ;PLANNED , GOMMUNXTY . THE . HIGH RESIDENTIAL., .QISTRIr, 124-30 DWELLING' UNITS'-PER ACRE), A1VDI"MAKING FINDLiVGS Ah,SUPPCIRT . THEREC' - APN: 1077421-11 AND 18. ' A. Recitals. Lewis Homes has' filed an application for�JJthe ap�Oroval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13859as described in the` title of htr resolution. . Hereinafter in this Resolution, ,the_,subject' Tentatiwe� Tract a`p request is referred to as "the.appTication." " (ii)` On the 13th day of June, "=1990, the.Planning Commission of the, City of Rancho Cucamonga :conducted: a duly; noticed. p�blia hearing on the application and continued said7hearin4 to July.li and August, 8, 1990. (iii); All legal prerequisites prior to tha adoption; of this Resolution ' have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE,` it is hereby,.found, determined, and.' resolved by,the Planning Commiss,:`on of the. City of Rancho Cucamonga as,fo77ows: 11 This Commission hereby specifically finds, that all of 'the fact' set forth ln,the Reclt6ls, Part A, of 'triis Resolution are true .and ,correct. 2. Based upon substantial ..evidence presented-to this Commission Burin the above-referenced 9 public heariros on June_13.,,July 11,. and AugUSt 8, 1990`, including `written and oral' skiff . r.eports,.. together,:`with;' public testimony, his Commission hereby specr?_-a71y};rintls as fol ows: (a) The application applies, to property11 '1ocated , at the northwest corner of Spruce Avenue and 'Church Street` and is, present)y unimproved and (b) The property;to;the north :of the subject site is apartments ,;_ and a park, the property to,,the south of that site is vacant, the Oroperty to the east is vacant, and the property to the•west is a business park. (c) That' he site has. been designated for 'High Residential. since adoption of';the Terra..'VisLA.Commun ty'Plan.:in 1983; and (d} That the project Was deemed complete on September 8; 1989,; and t . W a , PLANNING C O');�f�5'SION Rt,.6w ON NO. - TENTATIVE TrttC f4AP;13$59 'UWIS NOME$ August 8 14�0' ar Page •2 {e) That `the <" hnic,project •has successfully ?passed'' all review, Committees; incl ud,n g .Grading, Tecal, and:Design Review. 3. Based-upon,the.subst-�ntia. evidence presented to thj s Commission during the above-referenced' publ',_1 hearing.and upon'the•specific,findings of facts set forth in paragraphs. l and ;2�above this .Commission hereby finds, and concludes as foli`s'i „ t! �� (a� .Thai`,, tentative tram. is consistent with" theGeneral- Plan, Devzlopment rf• and speci fie;plans-.and ( i The design or I tproveTOts of the tentative. tract is consistent with the tleneral Plan Development Code,,and specific.jpians;' and .. ,.; a . (c) The site is physically suitable 'for the"type of development proposed, and (d) The 'design of the subdivision 'is not likely to cause '' substantial environmental, damage and, avgidable injury to humans and wildlife , or their;habitat; and (e) The,tenta"tive tract is not 'likely to cause sericus. public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any ,easement acquired by the public at large, ilgw nf' record, 'far access' ;}'; through or use of the property-within the proposed ;subd,vision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and Ortifies'that,the project has been reviewed and considered in .complia�gcp �wt1{ the Cali:foirnia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this; Commission :hereby, issues. a Negative,' Declaration. 5. Based upon the find,ngs h and concions set forth in paragraphs`. 1. 2V 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves ihe�application subject to each and every condition set forth belo(q and in the attached .Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein; by this reference. PlanningDivision 1. '' Prior to the recordation,Of the ,final map or:.the issuance'. Of building,permits C,ivhic fever ;comes first, trio applicant shall consent to', or participate: in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facil,.ties District prertainirtg-tIa the project site to-provide,in conjunction` with the applldibl4 " School`"District for the colstcuct,on="and maintena;nce,of necessary schooi ',facilities, However, 'if any Scfioal- DiStr,ict ` has pre yiqu'sly established;, such a Community Facilities, Distict,' the applicant shall; in."' the alternative, consent to the annexation, of.the project site T4 ` 77, 'PLANNING COMMISSION AE50LUTION NO.., , ,f TENTATIVE 7RACT:MAP 13654 - . WIS HOMES August 8 1990 Page 3 � f j into the territory 'of.-such existin�',Dstrict> prior to the recordation ,of the final map .or,the issuance of= bu.ildi�g permits, whichever comes 'first. 'i Further, i is the affected` School District has, not fornted a- Mel I0;�Roos . Community Facilities District Within tr�d?ve manths of the date .of approyal.'cf'the'project and prior to' the recordation of. the <final map or issuance of building permits• for said project, tHis condition, shall. be',deemed';` ~ null-and Yoid. En vineerina Division5 o 1.. Construct the fo'..?owing Master`Plan Storm Drain facilities: (a) Line'1-from Qeer.Creek Channel to'Church Street. (b) : Line 2-1 in Church Street frcm the site to Elm Avenue.: (c) Line 14 in Spruce Avenue. (d) The retention bas�.InAn La Mission'Park. � 2. Construct the fol,lov�5ng portions or streets fu11 `'width, including street lights, except fors oif=siHe, parkway_ improvements which�'may be ti"eferred untie aevelopnent'of the adjacent property:; (a) SpruceiAvenue from` Foothill Boulevard northerly to meet the existing portion. ` (b) Ch5'^h Street, from Elm Avenue Best to Spruce'Street.. (c) `Elm Avcnue West from. Church Street to Spruce=Ave ruo. 3. Construct the trai=fic signal at the intersection of Spr.!iEe Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. 4. A Master 'Plan 'for" the landscaping' of the. median within Church Street, from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue, shall`. ' be completed and approved by the City prior tq submittal of r the improvement plans to°the City for'review.: 5. The easterly left turn 'pocket -for the median opening „ vi . Church Street -is shown rincorrectly on the la est •plan, submittal; therefore, it shall be'corrected on the project improvement'plans.' . 6`. The Secretary to this .Commissj on shalt certify ,to the 4adgption � of 'this 'Re,solution. ` tit { PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION''NO. . 1 . TRNTATIVe TRACT,W43859 - LEWIS HOMES u ( August 8, 1990 ; Page 4 ;1 ,VPROVOm AND,ADOPTED THIS 8T,H DAY-OF AUGUS?,1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Ot RANCHO CUCAMONGA . ` BY; n Larry T McNiel Chairman ° ATTEST: ' Brad Bul I er, Se;retary I, Brad, Buller", Secretary of the 'Planning Cormil"ion. of ,the City of Ranch Cucamonga, do Hereby certify ,that 'the foregoing Resolution ma's dujy ands regularly introduced, passed; and adopted by the Planning Commission'of the; City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular'�neet3ng "of the Planning Commi!Wi : held' on the 8th day of August 1990, by the following Vote-to-wi't: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; �= L NOES: COMMISSIONER$: ABSENT:L COMMISSIONERS:, ' 4 Y 4 � T e l r y I Ir Af Q _ 112 s u.I-E'� or..�.��. 2"N� �gii=; acsa q D+9Cg. Z'3 i`oa gC C9k .3 _` M uyy, VR "•A 4V Cd gC_�{CV �is.. R>es OY�t6gp@a L�sO.S CV WGY'Q 0. CaiLr L W gn ,�Cy�O, L�U Y q1 Cr y 'O C'Y Y pLpL LbN.�U�� nIt O.OVaQC9MTs MV�^,Y _ GG � Y V GwY � { Y O.,6 G O O_, 9 6 m- G NT V aygp C+Y'I^q a'O YS «�d7YM3�.0p�4 Lt�it� L. NQ .xi �p`". �, a,^� , C jiNULLa�`o�y+ wh�Q �0 q'.Y �YaPy q y:e .Ac Y me�rJ �o nc aN� gs�'NQ Ys�.4y•'...J22 Nd{���Ya4 Nrd ya 'ma��1ypp �•��.s ac�.� �4 �yl S Cp�WNipw V f! -qZ G�N � L ««N Y � ���' N 0.6y�U s�>_�■6 Y p C Y��N� i�^.f :y N O Y`�v(�V Y O M i C C O 9�Y C i'Hp•S:Y N"'C 9 O O C A S Y.O � Y `«U G y.wCN q ypyp Y Y 06 W{N1 Q C 4 Y y® 9:U d Y V C G C Y y V SY.$�.EdY�v9,lGG C M -ZURCIX YC a -99 ci - "Es =jj_ tea. OY... •..y I ^ f...0��4 �00Y {y i T qqqqqpp ` ``^^ v _ o$ a N P Cog tz C C - Yl V Q 4' W a• U's l YS^oa� 8.9 J V a4py I yqN ®5 ,�^yjY40 i. p � � '� O.r ~ dM Y COG L pY4• 4` "tS.Vy..rtYE 12Op,M. �N� g_P� �Y aL. •pYyp� Y Y r O j: fGAp r CYLr O+0.3i CYOIo�tl�•OfW Y O=2L �C Y C Y'Y W Y L.o. Y e�-- T_ 6NS HLNO YgS,6N+6 . d NOH y e�f� wAS/H6 + L� iii U O GN S 0 L OHO r SY'SQ h,p m. •. _.v O. 'Y m� •H .Y ,Y. °4wYy7{Y�3ijou5�pp gr yy N QC Y ey b8 Y C C lag, 4 wU r'A Y H •'F U �. C Im L q .Y A■p.M o. j !.yV O'm ..S..q�: O6gG1 'a, 0 A .9qp A t A_ OgI e41 YNC --"I wN :0h -"O.. N-•e 4 L O. wA s' }p Vim^'^ � O. `�. Q®e^q•+� aL q3 N, N dyL os S C M O.>OY �N O.MT Y � L pIHC µt� x :5 L rdy a�g 44 V Q M L:yS .+9 L. :tCJYQ SO4AqN Y.uN w +�T�N�F GpY AO YY •V" NCY i�L •� O? UC.V Y ' ■y��MO IR ±4B 0.14 `zp �P VA. q 3' 01 6 y 6 N m S L O• q G y 'u L GY w _ L C Y G q�O p V M wu �° ' d N!• V L®Y C �d�C•Y U'M C•!N-..: a u1 y����ggy C +y V C O C L 9 m 61 N.E N''� > O M= A7 LNY G_6 t e Mq H� - L1 ��h��b0 :+•Y ul ^A ��fH�p, F;3 d'ZSOI aCypp q: L p+a~N4Np1�� d F VA� Cyy0C3�Mm N:� P�M q� brYiO L C.y 01 . °L.gG'O my�• ' nqu�d EL 6$•e w °� L. S •� Y: u9i ®®�as� y i.OY C pmC Y w e.. +Y 8; V O N yy _�- • q G L O a 4_U S P L O YC 7 w U q ymG apy- {D 6NVY� W.N NNIj N C CI - CY6 9e O➢ Yil Fr .m OC. �Os+ �..:Mp ` Yti.�CCm-7 iY914S :6.2u m m _^ 4Y m.yY WHTM ® . +NNt�.�f4 ' YY11 Y+ +r M HyN Y_ O bb°CgC �' .L QyY VNi Y yy a� wC ii !dpy�. a LML wO 0U ate. NFL. ]\v +_...N.NC� P w N�.�aY li, y o w i e+p dv`� d'p :�� yT� mwm, j �OKNC �4.: �dyy Yw L� •C �� � OO6w�`' IY mN OK.Vp MONO tc1a1r�,,.��Nii 6S' O�Y ��� O • !O �Dw uN O .�V .=1Ub� N y6 cy�Y t q p {J p • U1� .9.q� ��H�S{�� Ye -y1��Lel .=Lp �Y ROY yF� T WVtl P-W-b-N� �a'.m Nis WO.GT , C ^.0 r�. y_r� i _ BYbbb®� :C 4wga O�7L�bL p Ogy�M l �• B N^s YD Hg �w_LLN o' �m LC ®Yy U�p ale.Y6'4O ��O .III u a� Oq p�S5Y wuw �'pp.. Fq.�CNC�•q OCC�q^x r ly �� � • Lys O.{.'� y�u. O NHm�.OIr } FV m epos .ICC Y M C V Y Y w 0.4 C CI p ^ G�,�H I L U 9i C W O tl N L q j•S.V + u C s 9 � VdY'•^ C YLww _ G ���. ems. n y r !Lqm 4 �M6 H .O ^M�: N�q �Y ��V O.l�I Vli Fl�•� MO �4 1D, 1�. O OI �. • e•�.p. � V rV�00gw CO•. D O.Y qt� 00"LO CpO YCiICIN t�.9O rurfpGSOL W 6~9q. 6 'Ca�GiaY _ W.CI c�YYS 4 ERItL 1 Y O..d irw0 N qyv:. O s` �Yfp." YON C� O�yO Y Yba� MES'YY • O'.�u � 'Y�.r Y�)_ Cq�.Q 0.Y Z,y�,.Ntl C.�& .' q �d�� - '�E •� w y.QCY VY4 4.uN iC'.'. O >Na Y.Yd NN ' ^�CC O D1? vva WW 4.>a -e: W p.L CLM qi O. C �L �Y.w<L ,SK N:C�Y+ CG q O 9!1 a Vd �' OC�'O L�C MCyy u-_C� Ltl `�p10�g`grq.Wtlgg a.$Mq$ MCC q�e Hg9C �. 0" «O OALVt'C^YyYwY <.g6Yj 4C ^{yy� ytj.p:.L CNV� Lb. �O�tl1.Jtl r0 YNyY:Y{Itl`y 4y� 0;.iv YY M0y1 W�tl�C - Y.t > 1 q d.f YYYLLQ OZt C..dN C Gp�Qp N]/- 'Y�F e� (�tl�6 p Y N�uqu Gtl ll C C�60 0f�:ep1��. �F� uTtl ptl'L `NY CAN OY C.. LLL uY A a Wd0 �40�� WLW d �$ LOO�S 4L4�®.�II O� � CCpCL 0�0. "�� q,kC�l•`4 . - YGN W9Y,NY^LA Yq WY ® "6MY ✓7 OL^eL.LO SgICCC.6 yCy OrCRC ^tl ����tl ��p CNOt Cryy. LL gS NaV6 NOQYYC O'N�1 qp G' NY>�C C {Mp�n q.L G: 9 N�N 4 N Y(N^ 6,N Z N O'At. co 4,(. Le Y d OLy C pp Ol Y C L W Y Y C Ol W OT . CN IL O �W N rLLOG NY W Y Ty` '•�. ' Ytl Iq0 Sib pq �tl. NE Y .dfK 'dVp` Yi�`i pp6Pd ` ,Yp�yQ 1 12 q YLLYO 0 M C. NVA >•'O. C L.. Y9 r p .Lp D.C96.... O� N� d�y� rd pOppp_N Osqs►' Y tlyM d q�! s,$ W:. Gwe i� 1� Lw� 0M v 0> V L r o � S• Y G ..M 01 V �a C N' g B .C T q�� QN a®Y�P y A p6� •6N�. O Sa Y V MML• a4. C;L e e®y �e > '�q®2 E r �C �y� .L p8 b�y. OL� �,'. �bVO �Cy p. tlgi Z� O ILo Yl CO: q Md 74d^ mr 9 m t gai^ YG t�e'MyM YV ~ cp� H'V.4 uuYq'Y -�q q4.. w• ' ,'4 w CCi' 4�.V `POOgY® tl.0 Ciw�_ H dy.�. 0Y :_M 9m. pY$i'.' � ^Y. ��. d YM C�O W;. rs eqC Sr tl.Nw Y p Y V pN i!Y C4,#p0: 01�" �=e Y q�f OC d ' YYp ;uO' �1 CO'7. o � ��p4�p•+. i�'�: eOtl' tl� �6-"'G yaWSSeclgei' '�. L1 wC O L y C C N C `6 N :..C®�V- • yN -i a�w`M q r A :. p W IX y$�. �C WOr Y pc^.. ��V q�S �V_. V�V LAN 5'Na®�- qil�.+ a •C•�S`p•,,,i ZZ77 G tl N^pY y � sx.ua ,^s.a`1`.m' r Roi.. r'zLN 'su co �oN$e:e: �oY:e "trf$i Wgus��c`d •sew mmbmw. ~� ' _ .. - `r•1\ x�l V....°I ,�j 0� MO V�i O O�M Z. CN u`$ ^L O O O. YC G �rW Cd: I�YC'Q ALO JaJ �CUO 'Vy$L n GLQ 0 4bi Y i 0 4 Y r U =O•CN O G{ L a Y G q N N C 90 y 11. ,%;r« oTory.5 Napp Lo L pp CCqgG gy w dd'V :AGVp ~ Y 4o. 'p'J1`YO dK's Y ^ GO�.yp p N9. Wi $ mq�► ayC�Y V.Oa $ O LAY-0YY: g0,.4:''�L tia ffD U }§� 'OC "s {{LQUYOp•:. 6�ggM���C O y O M $C�. 4 C 9 t0s.� Yam.q®Z JSOOB�CV C T� r $L L. qaW.��O Q"pp B u�Ny �_X.. .y MG $� V^.O sy Y. 4Y^ V .YN 1� 'GCp *_N� gO�{L4gt�OY 4 aL oYCa Saa _r4Q` my.'d`® $ ��cec' a CZ G Y N V G^ w Vv ML.4 W ' pA3 V fqgR w MC4 L Y .ye 4YsV ay L,e �ca� °' '.L.caw yy Lpp3�. +� n. G u Y p.pA 6UK �Fp�N` N�` G iW N{Qpaq Y q4 GC . -� L4 pN-.O 4'wa G OV wp L7_ 4 G]4id Cw.CCA O.L N�LCO NCO -d U� :. GgAq74Ly TaO.C6VL ` L�� .: SiLL19iG ar+i�S � o ��1ilV OG.,L 1rN Yr Y.� N N GVG s y - PZJ m = L A lyC O �= V„Y wO d OA ^GeJ i� •d HC L W'.o QYYy .' vy tpp4��' $4`&Z 51i $ 6L so �YIN p N o L L d u L tl o cvp'!gQ Q^fig OqY YV MC' .+Za FC 'CC O N� P w 13 e ow.w. u a. you TL S L po i,i q C� • O feYi.°9.� n{�O C _ g9 0�� . Ss6� OI •C.Y Yi QB$ $ '�®6d^ aGf 00 Sd �. 3 �a1'��tmi �qp� Apr�L=p2.Lm q$ I a +� d°' _ �cw N O Y L L tl p p d$6C Lll�yp L' +r AO 9,,J 4Y`� 19Q n4 w rpYy�?i CNCd i`p� 4�N$ $� ..E:m '""' yysv �g�.tv O Gam+°;aqo y °. 9w 4�0so ,y.��'w y'w� Q•-� ne¢w ;Gs 4G c"�i ' Apt �p..;C Y r Y CpY�Y VAd±O ptl Lam^ OO �NN. i�Vl cc C G�p �o yw 6� -.tr. GYL.NC _9Yy r C\�a�l NM 0 OeeiCyp oc@ �Ouy�q tOCI r_r `CgOS �`,tGdLjN� Lw+ 4 K ✓.UV.^.� GPJM�.�� 46Y'Y ;i'a L�Q .w" VJ L g OV O^ w d N fr ap Yr j'$f H MA:V$ N M .C. �.e JL®:� `6 I.•�� a 46® J Mf sY. W®c S �.o � •` EN� tOO NC`0. Yry:YOy A d ':a ti Costa L Nwp a C10J.Ma Y~O 7 I'. EA 9 d �vC •} a ar _ (r. O L Q ,/LwL yC Y L V•id A y4 YY03- N �J tdd a u `� C L d Y.0 o o� xdmo a.A.d.. vYi :o :,c o uy �..�3 �_"'. "''.Q'�'c «:o c N. c'wtYu$� �� :$ u d•.�� .�. m `pN , o!"ZK Im +• OI `^.. C y LL d q C Y 0 tl9Q0�aCUy�bL�Y� Gy"q�j C C�. p d Y C q V C C N N ' r O L VV d V ^^a $Q d t 9-2-2 .2 C ass. <oV.diC oa`o �,.�' un$•�..�� i'• ��•.,`c ��.. �^.c�� «s , � ai ,`ar o`owW o® ..•'� uv .a4cN �«g��g..ocY i yp dp ;; uy eTsq o� oi3yyeir C� 9^ V�. N OYO.M LpJ � `� Y CN §CI%•� ..QY«0.^ Jad tim yG� $V� V ' 6.N�py� VC L6d O �,V '�C+w^i� VL e N QO�4 �ytlC� �y 0A0 y= C.s L YC NN p ®mN CC t r q Y^Yd OM Y Gb VY O ty NO w OM�.. Lw N^ a$ " oq �a,e �am3$c' 'n cq�o q�4�3ga No� d4 .`� Ym Lp L�`•� 0$ .0`o LS i 'N$ u_«Ol y® FL c— �' N� Y6YW8 wo+R N$9{QjFb4 S-NZ�'a a ggpp �y YIw `N Q� •^ O FJ11� 'NV66T09 pL dE yG_ J ,Y iY H� C1 »��p p�,tlgp uOy pppO CYNOa es, ®. SIN r aW� "M+N C Otw �C.. 4a4N C��. NY 6bY46Y6 Nq C'._}� iJ.■pp ` LOQp9CM l�OpA4'CWT _ ^a®p C. ■:e0 CO LCL Nb •apL C(`�6aAi.'�A^pyLCY,.. .V NV ®= g4 CG "O��q•.Y•L NL ilYU 90. �7�G:! ! ®�IJ elT� /�••Ni a1. +. VI "OL Y ' •Il 500y ai u rfj oi•. r� u �.,.w N a �9W 4Y Or► T O NNp 4 L. Y �' p 4T� Sr Ye°ja �L e��=: a AD a m 2 all L$ aCA e,r a e .. 9 L w a O j R s61 .tea. L.Q`■G,O' Wg lly�pm Y .L yL. � c FM . p _m w Yy4 � =(�J'yiT� O. pLN4 Y' Otly L yLgL qyG. �+-9 Z.5 yyy Y4 Y� D GI.Y�A +tl pYY Y AY ~® vu H nw ag 6i w c pps C p G4 .LZZ �t y O.COL CM L.'L OIN M6Ig r- FD ''" ICQ�:.LUD�m Nq ^..55 voA N iir� A A..� Ci Mg��4 OfY OM�O NG �N aL W 4 �yy t9�i/4 +gq{SO L.. -2Yu as. SSeZ N u �w & ei $ rL u a °.i u e~ v`Yo 3iprai$�'rL .v1 vL o`.w°'.s 23.'V e. 5-M H « Fro d � v� q•o» a So.4 * SS L G up E Yfj'uC als ef Paz bq 1i YNp ��Y _• Gam . `y3C 'Y� OW 9A ^Ow, is 6V1..?? ap+ Y44 H • Y� L i4��i y + W Y ~pq ieV�M G O N O4e= a0 c W_ N taw QQGeppp - ` �yYµyt VL N.V Nam. ' 0. '• G"�®p yR = 'L 1• p0u op$ arga�. ca �a 44�41 CCyyq 44N a `YL �O,.Y � � '1 roe y.�C� RGpMWI¢q}��O �Y�{pp6b� oY h aw a rUsC Lg ��is .. ;¢g� s� i b- eMve 0 pp sl p • �YpY.L. - OG OS Vyy . t p 013Y J ' L. C 6 W.gr S M m r.� Y =Ss yy=O L.. "•�.L 4`C ZE� sox �e» O: C.q O� r-O .� i►aa C.. $.. W 'G�^ JYY u.. .. a Gip p � b �:C�. r Y ►y N..Y W Y w p:p/� ctl Y $O N. pG.q p d.V.CO .00Y L. AGO d' O O ,L,r; m^ b g � � `@��• im3 � i ts 80 OT 4N�u9 rG�Y C! Y�" �' 'Lr �Y -•`s0> .pBY Y _ RRerra v$ �ko cc {y�SSG A' u Y� N L,-V �tl .4 0,V w�` N V+GY �GOppp �.� =a'"r �..v > O.SLR Vw jC�YyR M�yyy� �w M M L.e s S$A L mM Y 3� Y ^ >, p L p N AL L p�Oq1 N Y y , Y ilat =l -Z ns Y 3 . 6�e gr Q':B :w.4.w an@. �� . AMC i` a N b " ♦� �' � g NI � o` ui ' r-3g r RESOLUTION° NO A RESOLUTION :UF THE ',;PLANNING COMMiSSI4h 6F ,THE CITY..OF RANCHO ,CUrAt6YGA,- CALIFORN?A A.PPPGVFIiG EDESiGN' REVTEV7 PO° TRACT NO. 1s859 I'"LOCATED ON THE, NORTHWEST-CORNER'OF SPRUCE AVENUE AND, CF URCH. STREET WITHIN THE`TERRA VISTA PLANNED:,COMMUNItV IN'THE- H `61 RESIDENTIAL' DISTRICT.(24- 30 DWELLING'UNITS PFR ACRE).' AND: MAKING FINDINGS IR .SUPPO'RT THEREOF APN `�U7Z-421-11' AND ?9 - A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes has'f.rca art application for"the Design Review of Tract No.:i3859 as descrybed•., n the,tit1e .of this,Resolution.� Hereinafter, the subject Design Revievt:requpst is referred to as'"the application b (iI On the 13th day.-:of J.une,° 19901, the Planning,Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga•,held a meeting to. cohsider- the., appl lca'ton and_= ' continued-said meeting iio,.July 11 and'August'8, 1990. (iii)" All legal prerequisites''prior,ta,the adoption of�h1s Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, ft is hereby found, determinedo,,,ati'd resolved he Planning-'Commissi:on" of the City,of Ranch o,Cucamonga ,as.follows i. This Commzssioet hereby; specifically finds that sltof the facts set forth in the 'Rasitals„Part;A, of this ResolutipnRare"true and correct 2. Based upon subsfantial epidence presented o :thi`s Commission during the above-`referenced meetir�gs,'on `Jobe'13,:July.I1,'and_Augus`t.8;`I990, including written and oral staff reports; nis.'Cocminssion nere5y specifacall`y, finds as follows., u (a). That the proposed projccg -S consistent with the, objectives of.the General",Plan; ands (b) That the propo9ed design; is 7n 'accord With tine :objectives• of the 'Development Code`':and, th2 purposes,of the district in which the site f located; and c That the ro osed'�desi n'is in comp! rth each`Aof the ( ) P . P . 9 P �.. - applicable.provisions of the 0evelopment Code; and,' (d) 'That the proposed design, together -with_ ,the conditions, applicable thereto., will:not be dAr.imentat to tea Qubl'ic heatth,�saf ,y, or.- welfare or materially injurious to proper+ie''s or<irtiproyements 3n the vlcintty.: 7 k ' as - .. :fr_ PCAN(VING,COMMTS5ION RESQLttTID��N0., s DES 6N, REVIEW 64R;TT i3854 UW-fS HOMES August 8, 1990 U - Page 2' y 3 . Based upohAthe findings and coocl.uston5 set:'forth do paragrap{1�s 1 and.2' above„ this Commission,here�y.appraves .the`application suhjeCt to each <; and:every+conSition set forth=below and in the attached.'Standard^.Conditions, attached hereto and incarpar tPl7 'herein by-this reference. �Plannina 0#vision. 1 "n 0. aced, scored concrete, 9prgn'shal l:lid prsv'M d_outside the:garages., A second natural o*'crete band3.whi ., may be used:as a gutter .fn some �acatians ,sha l also be prisvided"`_' adjace.it to the colored, scored concrete, boron:'. The=.sign r ` Beta is shall �be shown on the canstruction'aoFunents,,'60 be. reviewed .and approved by the City_�P1an) ~ 2.' A minimum 2-foot-wide clear planter,area shall be provided between •the_low`'retaining wall 'and -the curb Qdge 4'f the ; drive aisle along.Ghurch 5treet., 3. Gas ,:meters ='and/or,„ any. oither%, utilit fixtures sha1.1 be screened from'• view . with, low wal]'s, `berminig lnd/or lodscapi.ng:' `These 'fixtures may, also,;be zncloseu--wrthin. I' outdoor starage areas .if possibhe, 4.. ' The'` project,. shall:', be',constructed v consistent with the preliminary.acoustical studies. , A final acoustical study I ; r "shall be prepared and submitted for, review prior to issuance;of b-of permits. The study Shai1' address,the noise;:alang:both Spruce Avenue.and Church.,Street and 'shall identify mitigat-idn measures to'be incorporated into the final project design; 5. The-:1/h-inch-wide a']dminum channel, reveal shalt be .pai.nted to match the;bui�`ding stucco color. i t� Er >> ?;e �xrrA ,:ianascape plan.shall be designed,in accordance_; N� with and shall comply with the City's adopted leriscdpe Ordinance.° i. An arched tiindow,trim piece shall be added along the top of ail vindows"where sufficient space,is available =The:arch;,' shall be consistent with those above ahe stairwells and' balconies. `1 'I 8. A sill trim piece��shat] `be added at'tfie bottom''of the .�i openings on the'walls enclosidg the-stairwells . The design details shall' " be reviewed and approved ; 'y :the City Planner , The sil,l:trin! shall :also be 5ed on th2•.balcany_ wiMs'below the metal rail' n' : ` E 9 t r " � b + PLANNING`CQMhII�SIQCSOLl1�I0N. N0 ;Q DESIGN REVIEW FOR T] 135��' URI -HOMES " August 8, 1990' ,Page 3 9. The. .tile inset design. shall tie changed to 'a different detail such-`,as a, ?oam medallion.,(with.,stucco.over stone' piece; or--simi]ar;detail•.. The"City Pi'annen shall"review and approve the-final -design, fo. The campact-walls on site sha�l ;be revised id sons areas to pi,ov icie.:a mor. .::i?alanrad Lligtr'�` t i71�vit anu-�q 1�17'e p . e� landSCeEe aria , 11. The,metal cpal1nol -Aetatl shaL'L,be painted 'to match, the i •,, primary stucco color - ' 12.° The'ma,n recreatzon`�buhlding sha•1,1 return for Iinal hleslgn Review Cf%rh.=thee approbal.� The eircular,'tower element shall 6e retained., 'an overhead trollis or tilercaf element shallt.eXtend' further, a•lvng`the right side of the pao1 side, .; d eVation,`anJ a chimney shah .be provided between the 'two large windows :on 'the rigft side elevation`. The CQmmTs'si.on directed the applicant to upgr'a'de and enhance �. architecturally-the„entire,=right hand side of the;pgol side elevation.. ; Eng 'neerina Division I' Construct the folid'winq Master Plan Storm Drain facilities (a)•, line. 1 frdn Deer,Creek Channel to. Church Street. ' t. (b) .tine 2-'1 16 thurch Street from the site;to`Elm Avenue. (c) "`sine 1 2 in Spruce Avenue. (d) The retention basin in La Mission Park.. 2r Construct th.e` following porti. nt I of streets full width, including, st`r'eet -Tights,` except', for' off-site parkway improvements which may be fe°derred �until .aivelop6nt`of the. ad3acent property (a) .Spruce Avenue from '.Foothil;) . Boulevard n_orther'' to meet the' exis-Ling•:portion � (b) Church ,Street• from Elm Av�enO yyes to' Spcej�treet'. (c) �Elm Avenue Gies' ta�Spruc `Aeenue.,t from th!,rch Street . 3. Construct the traffic signal .at the intersection of 'Spruce- :r Avenue-and Foothill Boulevard. 4. A-Master',Plan for the- landscaping :� `� median kithin Church Street, frod'Haven Avenue to Roche ,er` venue;�sha11,.` be completed`and 'approve'd by, the 'City--prior to submittal of. the improvement`pins'to the City ior, review: , L f �� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DESIGN REVIEW ;FOR TT 11859 -` LEWIS 'HOME August 8, 199,0 Page 4 C •� 5., The asierly left :turn packet for the; median opening' ih Chuxch Street' .is shown.., ncorrectly..on the,"latest''plak submittal`; therefore, jt shall be corrected on thn Fa3ect?=' 1 lntprovement nlaQs 4'. The Secretary to'this`Commission shah certjfy the:adoption of _ this Resolut:on,; �> ? APPROVED AND AD'OPTEO' THIS 8TH.??AY OF: AUGUST 19W PLANNING COMMISSION OF SHE'CITY''OF RANCHO kCUCAMO!+GA � BY. Larry 1 -McNiel:,, Chairman" �J ti ATTEST: 6A Brad.Bu l ler,'.Secretary.: r I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the-Planning ,CqM`Issio►r of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do hereby 'certify;, that :the fo:regoing,.,Resolution !Ji s dull -and regularly introduced, passed,, .and adopted by the RlahMng Commisiionl'a,r the.r City of Rancho Cucamon a at a regular,:meeting af_th� P1anRib9 Commiss3cn held>. Y 9 on the 8th day.of August; logo, by'tne. following,vote.--to-wit: c, AYES: COMMISSIONERS:: NOES: CO1MIS8IONERS: ABSENT:. COMMISSIONERS: r4 if j $ Y`M'"�otlua.a VwiO.� �a w`4aw o+P 2-n` SIN$ .`.wo+Vip a. «_P. i^ oQQ':c a .� �'+ `..x. 9 Oyye Mi ^d6 tlLM.4 dA ■ S2 rNy OF O.P .1aft. �3� Y L.� Oq paw >paMGC YY` lOY' OMM a �vq OSE_L6 ' N~O�l�i YY aG` . CY4F�"w CiY46 �VGy�Y CYY. SC LLy.+M 4 dW4Y.�N.`..u0 yGtl^'J O`V:. II�O`M�O.� .eitl- Va OyL� 4 " ty-41.oOPpO�p�� C flrYOfa' Y9E y�� y M CSu V E`er Y tl' i S N N GCY'L O CYQ O Y LY4id ' OS C' OypiyV �!YTyy�! l�s.y0' ' is cc CS6¢ �y YOMu7 �p�. rnVY�:YCwxNYO C ��i999 pa6.N'�y NY iOMa OOw.dY iN`. CCY�O M9.,Otl M^bgYp LS..w'Sp i_C N YS�My+C R pr N�tN^'Y+YS tlr-�rY V YYI Mg. Y L Vl O..p� btOfS Yw.O C i Yp N 00 p O_yOtl I.-gal Z �L Ce�VY� Cd q'Co O.Y�ytl y;0'YG tYSC¢36^ O S {{11 a tl L 6 L P.L@ O y O U 4 O Y i. G C s. 4 N C C"�Y N 6 Oo �II gp'yYC tl Y Y �'q. r�VYy tl~ D/id `o1Y'Y a+ C O Y '�+ Y O � II Y F i C.W G Ntl Yt Oe,-II 'ANY /S/.. �Q Oa�A MSS C tl NMI II. .ri .1y�R¢iYr q"G y3^COM , irvtl GCEN.Li S.. O !S OG.�N Hi KN+Y.ar3a rvO Am 1^R�FE 14 Am .. o. ' O sr N!� py6yN cc mg Cq i MIN ecq 4.ag'S+y�ge'� '. �� Y:V Q ytl ` �{ S C � W y == L Y ®r 5� :aa' g YSsO M.'. Q 4 �• � W, � � _� J Nr Pf 4 M1 ti .Y l.•\ VY +r 6Ys- QfO��Q'u Y�RL4G2ngLaQt •i �14...� vV � O C.r BY.� Q/ �+Vi� � r�Mt`«� O C yyAy T� ?L:Y `V s� �y�•iN a .LY o na.. �• �''� r' � va . $c .4.r0C -G =QA 2-. 'G K,s 4r� oN ao�o � 88 .ipt o..�pw•a YcM s3 n+•@qi� v AsyZ-a. C�iw.'Y r rq'4L a �+. $,g. �• ..r .:L s .. �..O a.Hr• L.}4'O L V O GnZ.� CLOY V.wM Cr G^.�N aT���.�r �.i1M r CQ�.A •�L.'. . 6L.rnl ON«I' rr w- yyy {' - V ptl L 4 O tl Mp s v 97 9q.a stow �=zs+ye N�•o ia'p"wp':n"`^.i gr Yy Y.G yY-rA 9K� r y$. L {y1G Y M bn.G...N wy.4»� 'OY Va�M�,j' h��NCwwM GsM Y'. �Y Yp L,v ate` a y�aN. r VCVTc +vim :. sL+prs ^q.qNw R> `r�'Q� F. TM�tl3N r ��.vYM yY aw. • � NC �7 o.'w y �'y�.O.�q, .r � y w w uw Gi CC:'� a p. y Ca 6r VM�.M N '.wZL 6�y w.p V L Y Na C^ a: ��a/{O{y// :w 6M y�YY4gGN G4U }M,t 9g1'�y=j� q V+I. Si 4 gg0�p ^`Pf�..Y 4 G �a.•�4 q «��Y V y�.II W y M-.N V y Qp � 'V Y r p -l i` L A... 'C .''fir 4:wT m• y..a 6� �� •c,wo vo. •T�� g„-vim Yr� ri.I s; CG►B r.n is cz yNNyt{ ~ O 4�L �+ GM••y G« P.yN aY p4VY V� tll'p Oy' - C "w * ^�qq GY w{C{�I wRa�TC rppyyw�i�u}}..LL L VO :' •C`.�Q.i OGN'Y Yr YIYN N.r:Dirw Y'41 p ��MN a«ry Wrr a iI CCG Yi F'N.NA Np� V til w6 eT V T Cr• w vy K... 04r Y Y iL4 ' M r l Or -w�iqa � 01 wy. �rOr My4 Y PQ MY Y.rY 6`V� _..�b v , Qaz L =1 p wpu:`w y� vL� as .T. �w �� 'k:arb Kp.coN` 9fj�vGzr Ia.. ,,,�w/L C q �VQ 40 ^ �aP w �iqq.� T .VC yYiJ}!g V M4~~y� w eM1 M.J E OY 4CC Y� Z*S M OY M JNi.Y.r�E CC� .w• /(� yp., Mi1 J L. pe Y u,G, �!; Y�G O�p.COR Ni.'S1�} .IL1yCerrV ' tlL^s A ,..awrn pV` wF Femo +' M,/�gr�yChV Nyy VEI Y�' r �C w•. „y �y `y�Y O 7� .�-..:L Vtl~vt � . S.wQl�;p/y4 Tpf �MY`' V �� 4 Y�• � V �Y.F ii y b� ...4 2_ TsS Its R�CC VC pQ«� OyO lNy4 � W .O11V�p�y rt6 a S 3L9 {Ly ±A O �•Y. drW Y. aQ Ertl i� g LYyGNCo J24 .. N uO y„�. r' gE M.. ■N .j_rOe •» p �+YOL t�j 0y�4Y api�0U..1.-. p . iMNwl�g .,. ,� W•pp'«'yit. :.IN O%~PM a�`tlGyG�'p� na vLy ytl� as . ga Ntl o4 LyV A�-..V4baC •Ga tpat�C C � O� uV_ yN G .. ♦� ...+ Ce 4`is' ONYf«i Lwe A�y�.rQ r�OG`O ,.gg .A a.s.Y G, LVs� rY �V.r�VR � Lf V4p.V tlO tid�O f c wa$tn ".�.:5 4 3 <Aa'a�' 'Ini$. <.;e x x «w �. yc�ry,��i.Na. .�ka<:a '.. x F- 1 a`o+i �o a C at :Off" O C Y 4 y 4 �f 4:;-C�l Idc.1 Via. ea Y^N o cYL t� aw",� t 1 _,a* 4N aa ~CN �A6..m^i�LC^Y C Cr YC.. O •Oa'O 1f:. C.YLY� DM C,R_LLG 'Svy. 1 NCC Y> ■M�I OC L" N y{V� V" y0 yw0 YH.NN 00. �IO�V S' O.Ya Q�CO Lq¢. C + za- 3.4 C O` iw..tl O :O�YY re Lug • C .�C Y=..YY "�� M AVIy >.Q G�� OOYp"�''~O��v YLa C•" G Liu CG •� VaCN=rA.�p� O L�L YGLO.1 tl tl Q1'1 • vM NNO r.O� �d�M e« N O LlO S.,GuM '�� ON�C ay Nep• Y�LN�ON ^ iiV� �C tl.{C�MY agyY "~ .Ya Zfa p'• O Ni O ` aG Lr3G VG iQg 'Lir 13 _H.'LOS^L•L..c LO AO A.C. 0` t'i111Ma .. e d Y pO L,0 O. d s 7 .G�. t L •..tl O .1 N O�e C MYc u "LG "_GyL try�g pGGa `C iY6p�... tt `O.�1 LLN Y'O O N'.O.6 N 4 e s e i p N C r w F B. gx �g Ma JC�.".A 'S.a Y-tlp LOrLCCC YY+N p1 wCY. e1Y ' •y`O N M GZx OOY 'N NL 0�1i�/V •�Oi. G` G L 6VY 0.�� ON i V prCYN =p;MC �p T^gyp e�� V Y �L ■ G�+O � 1'^Q`LLOC3C3VGL GCA O+� G tlM ,,GG q 4 0 N^.;YC L LY G LSO O W ..ice Yy C �+ •L 61 rN r'r +ML aY 3N~ tYI� ^...0.9LV^Cry , ST 'G C p•r CU Gu ... ee�� VV Y�I�o C N�N1M Q.N� <M aMO'1'�aL SN:Zglih.01tlNS0 <•w Si. <u M09 O I oaY• auc s o1vd cc. a �tairu' ? °`clgro ==pMp�L N`�sa rC1 ou " Li5as fio Ya�¢� s '�+a ygLO, �Nqa: r~.�� '.V .L� :.Y"' ..per` 1a ftc o �e�a tl o 0.15'� aid ter. Y $«2.E r' €fig^ y' $»; Z H ata a o e.i�� ,AIL or o sg�g E yC Ypp O CYOa q OVN.. ii ►. p• 9$> . V`;• � st�. 1����111L.` • �V•Ew.®L ON+V sc 731 •V�'OerN O•l p.Gr� .CY tl y N ^ s Ls p� w:9.+'zRNOGO`Q•CMjy wVQQY, [W_L, Mx Lly .: YYYM 'V"1"• Y �' �Y"`6rV ®®yy Y L a<c. tl ■ V �. � Y 9 "w' �LLe' 'fi .��.�.. Yra �� O ..L L- e L 2r o G It S�L t:Y'Y°u5 8 <+�® a <e N ►.4« <Y' to iG o«`.• a V Wyy O G W YOi.O.1V. r • V L Cyy .Cy T% G_G Qy9a y t3, V C H m�/S Y■ `�G O C'b �®( g L Y 1N:� -1gi oVCo '6�LL Q.. i^ 00 0�■ aa0 ���... �LT Ot.d -G v.N uyo.) '• dN � a'.'L �^ °.i $.y � '.�"°,—', .'<w•E�... vwa � mac. Y~•O•• N'�aa•3 CY�p rV. 3 q 7 Via.44G: Z wi:a oai..td, N.,au Lwo W qZ79 ` .a ��, �bd �O rp�:¢ •r..uyr a n• o cy` G4: oa'�rY + qrY.. y�{{a V a0 .G p YN yq Y•a,rs a- O«.;� F Y L� a LiO Z. V �V OOC qA VfJ = M $ G0•9q M a +1p1t d y,...0 aV0 $«3. VO'A L~LdLaO A1211 4 .4G YY'^V v t 0= Y O G ��ryry �.�.6I.^L � C wCr •�iuq ^O.h V a0_ S '.ZVM{T '.T9 Yra,.. �b�gbG UV p �V A«:N Gam: CV 1: CVS CM q V:{i W �r^Y Oy C.: O•V'CQ d �•a C y` at-- $� ss G6 N'O^'-� vY•r'i<O �w uCyg N OA Vim . YAa ZL a^C bO.y L�d SYy MpY� ZiC Y Va 06 VL VC O.Yr y.eL q- G Nq.LY a }yu3��OY�C, Y•. � f~ yq V&� N yV O`Oy ULWy J GOb' :•1� Y . w�NCV Y V V pypGyp �VEa OGw.'gG aC.O m VaVC QL OO Wf1 lV 9 'y� Y.�1VNW «`GO�LO'1 q Y VCG 90r0 3YK Lr_QmL L.O 1�i �J dC N V' O NML- VT'�:_O 3`•i Y,Oy `6v�6HO L ''V OVr . C 4YL C`CL ry A d ^ IOfW1 �7ipra 4:Y{S i3yC N ..N 4VQ.•. + ' �.q.9�6 I-•K nrT aL4..A� � W Y `"^oa`�v� wL a.^V •a..^ ,. '"cia. o ..cis rsw a cac c N ` u ray 7r cSZ aM rj N� Y.Y��tir e` � a--� aa�.'`.- •L. m4E� :. p� �o►�a q :off e6" y� AeM; V C .'pew ♦ p ^ p {� {y � St^r • ip q vg� �Or i.�p � aY��- NL � .Gp4 r aV ytl�� s aia..c 'a g ya_-L►,� ,'S csS'yYUr Ggq�gg4 :a3yya�� a� =� -0 n r B p4 c L �.� y ��.a. apL� �.b OM4a YO `O �w yq� •`�0.� wfj oLe nY T� •' u3'or5 ^�pa s $ cyY)Cp.Qpe eYCCd®0 myo0.A qWy �_ ^r+90 O G Ol 9.0 ZLW 4C ii nY ��.~J q p "^0.. � ..�_ ^ gY1saq�V 4O M`1•.y ®� Si{Op, Y�• Ow VV +«p= M °dy $`a„io $ oGAqyYyo N YL^V•y` $E .d+Yii yL �N yY C Y• ® w • Q9gqfa...^. G 66 sY' ^17 ^ Gr1�r M }lelys ml`S.y Y dIT�V� 6_ 0�� ^. �Cyy^ fC�'`tl�Q �Y9 +� YU aOrY d n8 OIL`{ f1 Lp YC®mA NVcC� ®LYJ O LV LYe Iwo roi r3 va4t M G 9•L. .•atL i� Cr A,Rc c wC tJ WiH ®S 6:Y G '4 �{ `jn •Pa�cac auk t §§�a��! aL g< `�� •O�� aOVb'l'J� 4y3L nC N "- ro ", 1 L gAlt9y Ga LCJ qT � � q 4 N :GQ �` f 1,� �fi� �sY�C� NY•fl �O � � y � Gam.. U ."''� f �LC 4rCYot� irCl� �.. 'S tl _� T CSC» M � r•.-, F y�.'?d <~4gNi <CE O]',,µ^ � � i ��{f r��'.T•»• 4rtl .� A N`q Y.yv M.a.b. �3`t��t LvC ``- p�._:N •�1. ��.LpO `� GW :- 4r abrJ qN.~G� .�Y 41 wL L � Y9N0 RMF. � QaN t1 6rt4t.r G< � "L r r@ t 8C-0yy6 V4 1 g t!m V.;; �'Y ro4 YC qs 2{ ffQyy O 9 y`,;'O i. '` �C■/ p L ygC._Q �' WM.e...- +L•O Qw YL N �uNyW� q d 4 VY �$ � It,L Wn.YO$� 'Y a4i p+9i yq,T N`�Cf'ptJ w� Y 4`LMO G� w Y Y O Q.1'F N� Va£q YC �'t cro 6 a. 'E`�Q^ro Yq � ...4.�. >»..:Y, a w� i �u "� ` '*+t•°`�'SS ��.' Grobip2 CF Oa�. n. 4o�,,a+.. YGU •4 9�.� M ��'.L � �y UyVU '�V V'00 N yYwy�L L nyOlq 'Ol_'``+71t : 1 y �'' Gw� �r■p L�AL« tl M- L .ti. b0 6 : uGq.�`� Sir. ...1 1� y pp 4w Y 4TC a2 'v O_R LC yN SQ.wy�Yg Yy Maj.. KA V.Yq DfN r a YA:I'N �=W.:�•+t0. Lf �q �lw �•�L,yG �•d �• c%'i l!i: q� �� L LC.tf�qp � ' C4CK�yy�. 09 .b •. �ti N� �:yry�s ,pbb,�«:.. �^' Us. •� .C6G 0 6YCY L4f i_Og. -��. CAZ 1TO Lr ' �.Q _wti C:,. 4� Y Yra►.b tC�� _" p i AQ M Ytiy W p6Vv4'� • 4 inC a L+i ^ L M4��:. de p� a y y�'�� '4 V p Vy� Y a...Nl r i .:�' ar`. �=4 sa�'��w�+ ,y$a t$,v � 4AZ', a '� b�j f awq �Lly LCQVy. T7i L.9 «yCV s`rt• V N Zz- :W yy Y�a i U 6ggT >>ApaM YLa A q~ L= _ f Y -=- 4wy ro a',:LiZM gµ :g•N � . Sim « yQg�bw sCy A4 .Y L I5y'w+b .�• a..., ... .,roN ao y"�Nso * 'Jse��$ �Q '$ °'• �c :: �e"rco3il�+ «� N4■p «4 „yy CC �Ng .rry YEE y,Cy ��q}'�a V s+. pyyNVyy uyYe bIA b`MWUA- d �:.. Vaaa IIWs W y l 0. pp a4 59 ®.`8 r «.« ma 6: ra M cut Wo "'#7yy�$: R`-' gHISS .c$ Nam.. �qa•'� s�iw bwy ^. g,, <°`v '�. ap8`'$wV A�ro Ny C�.. 4p q,•q,•Y Ra Y Wr'A D•6.. V� W� $ ���LQ SSS ,i ��.'�UaiYy H.� ''Qi� Qw �'M NHdt tr• b N+'q s`j «QV� �4ClY C. p 9�0Ymom LLq CLbb°� gyqO,L yY» KA ks0 Cr Lii �AB VH. 4WL .Y+ro~i S .A N N: ♦ L � N H q` M � � , Y- V110 o coq+o w o c N v" p•o+ - h� � `• Y�Od YV NQ CY CC LY�+ N < +[ ��� LY as L L g L. y Y O .Y 4 C ' Y ai o d A u o q c N i C u C Y yN M `Y O mow. qU tlYYCV VC �' Ow 6� «N rd... Or��C AY p�C w d~ Y4:`OIN CN VQQ` Ytyd-• i �W: &� gVuu �•TL0c IIYp qqY �j � L wY C tl i = LO qY S= a = y G N q Y COL GL CrASY LY.6a� � C^ ..dO � C �`K d✓ _. W1gg� �C YC BL .6L �^Ld�YYL Nw ^ O.Y q^41 YC YY-OSOC �+ �r^O IIL V �7 O V.YC'0 OGGdC V Y Nv. g p w .•..L.6{LY. YY. L. uW ^ wwY.Ltl W. CN:.Cw G...O'.q. `--.W Y..: ..w. .wC :L.Y IIy � w �9 �C r': 6^ � L t-.Y Yw �.. v1�ikyy l Yt C YYw O4 O ' FV I�N.V.W 6aN aW N4 6`.0 K6� 6w ZY'NL 36 L)tl -fib 'C q N L O v V U Ali w13 :`II au aSY 3 Yd o, Y QwrF�� - 4$pYN6 p� O1� 7 Cq Oy % .� VI '1 �pY$.. Mp'J`#C.:C. qQ o pLp� w L QQq Y l 315-5 , a O 72 Y sl N N; ^V CC » aC at9 YO �r~� wadi Sli^Y W t �p®C 1Yv op �7a AY os >~C yM 6 �... ..� �' �`r0 ..:tCJr1YCe p•g e .a N Y qwV C qq p �CZZ su o rya L tl$$ gg L^ N a'v�....•�pY C� _Y'Lo pN o� � _,a ��.rY�y�`c �3 sYi n��y�'.' �qu�Lk 4 3'L W 11 L .0 a Cq Rb V �. •' �r V"Y' ,7 in OW 9^. t iRW i»s cc O V NY L-L Oe «� C Y W Y rfy^ —e �4 o� 9a 71 6®2 cow 4c v�i idJ ago � uy. ' 4 ;�LY'da uo� Yayye M e o a��N His �4 LY®® a ur^ L 21 a mo.C' t3 LL L.Y O.Y i10 E :QOW � O �yyY w4. 'pN `M1 w y '�^ O C^ .� P�!� O 4 � ,... Q lIL• +4w Vy r�� :, it eY F�.E Oyu aw u^ s•0 L 'V 40 vy^(y C Vq it O Q:OC M ® W Y Ya� a �a 9 W OY.C. lP�G6c C^L ^ N 0 N�GppO®((E Q 9 py Z5' 4y p yY d_G YY �yaO► SO , Et �a� am QV WoNY CC w "�r. X VS• a Y.i a op�yyo L 0� N 10 =m Y N iy� N II • �'� ^ C 1i CITY OI�RANCHO CUCAIv201VGA STAFFR DATE: August 8, 199Q TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad B0 ler,-City Planner ,a BY: Brett Horner, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONM7ENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND`'VESTING TENTAYIN E TRACT 14E30 LINCOLN,. PROPERTY-' COMPANY. - - The A.evelopment .of„356. <' condominium units on .20.25 acres of land; in •`the Medium -High Resideotii.l,.District `(-k4 24 �dWelling:-units ,per acre) n the Victoria': Planned Comnunity,i located on - .the northeast,correr of Base Line Road and.Mj.l liken`'Avenue - APN: 227 69Y-:Ol.z , Y; t I. BACKGROUND: On,July.'lI, 1490, tF�e• Planning Commission accepted? the request requesti by .Lincoln Properties.to reconsider the 2-2-,`,vote of �. denial rfor .Vesting Tentative Tracth 14630 on �June Y_3, 1990 Therefore, a nev pub Iic'hearing' has been advertised-, the community AM has been noti.ced, ,„and the` reconsidera'ton is now. :ready for Commission review and action.' II. ANALYSIS- • .When tte.'project originally came up, for Commission review, ,,several issNes and concerns were expres"sed, The' , Commission noted. that the-".atire;',arch itertural, scheme needed upgrading (based on ats proximity do Central Park), than carports should not be used; that ;a ,perimeter' Wall .or :fence mignz �? appropriate, that the requi sV'for an.,increase °i'n;ahe number:'of one-bedroom units allowed',was of concern, and that detaiTS 'of 'the acoustical harriers for„the patios and decks should be rev1;wed. In addition to these 'design issues, there -was c ,9si.derable pubS7G testimony and concern with 'the,project'. The residents,.Ark ;the, surrounding neighborhood :were. concerned. that,,Ahe site was,:being developed'with rental units and-not with :a fiat-saTe"product, that the density was too high, that.buiiders 4a not properly disclosed to buyers that the land was, inteoded for multi=fatuity,, that the project would : det.ri mental l)f ,impact , local' schools,- 'and that, traffic, noise., n�;d cr.�me weld `ircrease i'n`the area. 1, -III. .RECONSLDERATION RF,OEST °fhe -applicant` is requesting. that,;the Commission, reco ts,.-�: denial" of`.the protect and has"indicated a willingness to!iwork...with the Commission .and local resident r` to 1 address the various concerns:,` The appt,cant.has'alrpady withdrai4n the ':1Conditional Ilse Permit which-- was •:submitted'- to'; alTovh tin 3 ITEM't, i PLANNING:COMMI5SION ST��F RfiPO1tT EA, & VTT-14630 , LINCOLI� P�2OPERTY CO;. August 8, 1990 lam ` Page 2 1 4. r increase .in the-hum ber`of one be units ' This action dictatesf � a ;revised slte.,plan whicYi should tie sent;back,`fon, review and approval by the, esign Review Comn. ttee� The Committee could look � at Lhe other design.issues at;'such t o as we)1 ;v I:V DENSITY ISSUE*' ` Staff would .also }�ecnmmt.�! :hat'.,the,Commission discuss the .issue of densi y. tonight ;a's We11 Given 'the 'gnificant t esid'ent.•opposition Co,the project;density .and u.it type; the,:Commissiun.may want to reconsider the overall .densjty of the project. '° Perhaps, a .•new site, plan could .be generated tp � achieve a;mord gradual transition ln density-', 6 the area C' - .Y ... Staff notes that the cite was briginall}r designated' ith two ' resideklal, land uses, with.;about half' the site bein;g Medium Residential (814 dtirell.rng' units.,per acre`) and. the,other• hal:f being Medium-wigh Res,idential . (14=24 dwe�'ling units per acre) The.project's density as its is curzenttyr ii`esigned is 17;-7 units per 'ac,re Which the V�ictorts Com�nuniiy =Plan permits,and t�hich the, tit Design 'Review, Committee retomMended` approval of. HdWever, the full Commzsslon.`may wish to reconsider,the ,current site plan 'and recommend' development; of. ,a different dwelling unit type (townhouse, duplex, etc ) 'for use.,pgr the:nortt)ern aril eastern portion of'the <site: This would be more ccrsi,stent.'w�th .the r original 8-14 dwelling units per acre designation and provide fior t a more gradual transition an•density.?from the existing and plannea ` homes in the area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff' recommends tfi6, the. Commission d,i'rect •the applicant to ~develop 'rev,ised plans which' •address the; density transition�.' issae and• .'the_,.varlo�s site plan and architectural design 'issues and thenf,send the project :back to the Techocal, and Design Review:Committees : Tie applicant should also be��directed to work w1th" the surrounding community,;whildeveidoing =t e� revised,plans: r s Resp u y. tted + _L. Brad r City P anner, 4 "I MOH/ifs, 1 Attachments•. Eichibit "1" . duly;,Ll `199Q StafffRepbrt � ` E"bibit °`�" June`B! 199U sta.i Repprt z' tiff 4 t r ."�,...,.,� CITY Q `.42ANCHO..CUCAMONG 8- AFFREP DATE: July 11 1990 'TO: Chairman and Members,of the Planning Commiss7oia k FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST:FOR AECONSIDERATION-OF ENVIRONMENTAL,.ASSt,SM'LNT-AND•VESTING R-_PR�PERTI� -i e' development 'or, Jbt, gan om.n um un son m 1b;;-acres;o, and i�h the Medium-High Residentivl. District-"(14 *14 d�lli`ng um 4s .per the Victoria 4lanned'-Community, i.ocated:an the nortteast cor�7.er of Base Line Road:and Millikerr,Avenun = APN. 227-691 O15t * BACKGROUND u On July S, 19909 staff r,®cei�ved.'the attachedletters, requesting X� ' reconsideration of :Tentative" Tract.14630=and',withdrawa_rrf Conditionals. Use Permit 90-05. °On;,JUne 13; 1990, the. Plann ng:.Con fission took action, on both Vesting Te►�ta`tive Tract, 14630• and 0oo itional• Use Permit. 90 05` for;'the Lincoln Property QroposaI ,�,T,N6�recammendation .for,'approval was` automatically ,.denied. on a .2_2 1 vote Fol'lor'raing the. Planning Commission's action of June 13;`;the"applicant:;filed-'an;appeal,,•wi,W the, City Council. Said appeal. was tentatively-scheduled;;to be:heard by the,.;. City:;Counci l on'July-18,.; 1990: ;_•however, with tfje.re'0f0t`of 'Lincoln Property's request for reconsideration :for, Tract ,14630,and their letter withdrawing Conditional '-Us e. Permit 90=05, Lincoln,` Proper"ties.'is,-no' r: requesting that.tM�,'Planning commission` reconsider:their;action and set . . the revised proposal f0 public hearing,' Lincoln Properties'has ih6cated`in their letter that upon acceptance of the reconsideration trat� bey`,will withdraw:;their ,'appeal .:of'Tentative Tract14630.'; II. RECOMMENDATION.- - Staff' recommends. .that the `Planning; Commission accepts the request far reconsideration of Tentative Tract 14630 and set it for public hearing on the July 25, 1990 Planning Commission agenda : ,i Res fly tUd, Bra e 9 s City tanner Attachments: 5xhibit-"A" - July ; 1990, Letter fray Apcant Exhibit 1! July 5 1 ,96., `Letters from Rppiica�tit LINCOLN'PR PER�"1`L'Ot�JfPANY1V�:rI1�IGt - ; Mr: Brad fiul.ler -Director'Of Planning Department + Rancho Cucamonga LrA Dear Me Bu13er e I am writing to torinal1, request teeonsideratioir. of1 Tentative Tract zzo� 14G3 i �q The.reason for this request is'because Q t the ti "f-Cite whic�ti"occwrt�cl at the Planning, Comm.ssion' hearing• on` June' l3 •1�0 ,ancl o),ft, desire .to"caax ,nth the :. Coamission members.and the.catiians to address their sign concerns. � If'you concur and -econsideratAon'is y granted i request ftuit you ii3khdraw Lixscolr Property Company's aoeat'to the city Council ;which is pr"esently sckieclii?ed for `July 18, 1390`. f fry i Thank you for your prompt attention to this mattes Youi:s truly,._ , TU LN PROPS' t'Y iXPfPANY N C 2:1C` a 'l N mXti.n'W. Garrick 1, Director of �evelopme.t `r �l 4330 La 16119 Pillage privet Saito 240 San ►fgrnia 92122 (619)452-5911 Y � �J' U 1' 48 n 6 rJM ��'£�a t - 4, LN PRoZsEm Cowm �x Ta7y fit:Z990 r' Dixector Af Flsn�zing t , \ I0500 civic C% taint** `.x RSAcho Cueam�a. t�#. 91723 _ ' f ,' Dwr Mr. f z am°wriung, to, you to f6rvi ly,.r4m_ .t the .dt3,thdraas� of �Jizr Conditl�on ! U3® knit`fox tentative ltraati;-u6. 14fi30 a the are 'reciu sting �#.tlydr�aal of tbd itionil Q,e T inn io&siga ug of the fro ' foltowsttg ek- �]tiue 1; , T990 harsh§ be ok the glaaeiitg Cmosdsaion. ,Th�refcte,'at this tom;` do:_agt'f1 tit it'wi31 ; n ssary 3n our d"16 to `a17.aRa� 35$ oia� bedtoom uxiit 7 mi t t OUr 2LS.S1 11t a,ia:thid ffitter i3 =icb apgEeCltt Yours truly, P1 'Y t 'Atd2'N.C., Il�TCs' W. 'Coxrick Z OE T5evalo zit 6Xy 1aSQSffi1' r 4� p y�' d33QLaJaU iki$z invz�Swca240 tSanDicgaCz1lSamu421223 (619}4S2iaTy MFAX(4I4}535Ta67 tr CI f OF RANCHO UGAMONGA RT DATE;'_ ;Y June 13 1960, , TO: Chairman and Members of the:Planhing Commission .� FROM- Brad BulTer, City Planner h 4, S DY: ;Brett Nor^ner Associafie'Plenner SUBJECT. ENVIRONMENTAL"ASSESSMENT FWO 1iESTING TENTATIVE IRACT.2463D r LINCOLN PROP EP.TY COMPANY .-• The develogment,' of �356. condominium 'un is Im 20 15. °acres,of land,; in .the tiel,u__ hi1h, Residential District (14=24. dwell ing,KmJIs,per, afire; in the,- victaria . PTanned` ::;Communty;. locked. on the northeast' corner ,of Base.'Line Road:and Mi>Ilikewi, AYenu CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-05' LINCOLN PROPERTY'.COMPANY` A request for a 4;'`;perceni ,increase in: the :allowable percentage.of one bedroom uni s witfi" a proposed,356tuna1., condominium project :located: on the northviest corner f Base Line Road and�,M,9lliken Avenue - AQN;. .227-26t t-4 �t I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action. Requested: Approval" o,f subdivision map,. ;site..pCan, grading plan, ,landscape .plan, and,Plevation,sy and issuance of , a Negative Dec7aratlb B: Project Density: r17.7 dwelling"units per acre C. S+irrounding,`Land Use'and''Zoning: 6�.rth S.iggle family residential; Low Medium,Residential ` i (4-E dwelling units per acre) -Vacant; Neighborhood' Commehcial' East vacant; low-Medium Residential (44 d►cllin,g units per acre} r West - Vacant; Central Park Sj4e` ' 0. General Plan Designations: ' Project Site - Low-Medium .Resideni lal 't 1 North Low-Medium Residential �r South., - . Neighborhoodrm Coercial East - Low Medium Residential L West. - Pa"_ T ��r s F PLANING ;COM11I5SION, STAFF REPORT QTT 146X & CUP'94=05' -` )_lKCOL1f`PROR1ERTIES COMPANY June 13; i990 QageL 't E. Site Ohara�ct.�ristice: The site, whrcrl°slopes,approx mately 3 4 percent ;frorn,,north,to' south,: is `vacant. with remnants -of, a former vineyard:' ' F. Parking Calculations:' Total Units:. 356 Unit Mix = Ibedroom 140 ' !, 2 bedrooms 116. 3 bedrooms 4G` � Parking Required;; 140 X 1 5 =` 2i0' 176Xloo - '3I7 40 X'2.0 $0' �� 356 X 0'.2.5 $9 - " Total ParkingS aces Required5 9 Parking Provided - 4 Enclosed Garage ,. 198 Carport 204_ . Open 294 Vital Parking Spaces Prov;jdtd � 96 '11.. ANALYSIS � A. Gen eral: The prole.;t coz ta'."'o' three ,different unit types ranging in size from a .714 square foot ofie-hie'dro0m,Unit to a 1.111 square foot' three-bedraotn u0 t. The.units.are e arrang in four V, fferent building 'tvpes, '-''Pal"I:ing -i's provided in enclosed garages, carports* s%and. opdi' stalls. On-site amenities `include a 'recreation building, two tW lot$ two pools, and two spas. Three open play areas and a tennis. curt are'also provided. B. Conditional Use Permit> The ap^Iica.nt; has lfiled.* in conjunction with`.the vesting tentatGe map, Conditional :Use Permit 90-05 to permit them to exceed the "max'imum number''o'f one bedroom 'units within the;pro ject -:The Devilopment,''Code , limits tho number of_one�beoroom units io. 35% of irhe total, number of units unless.the ,Commission approves A Gonditimn ,1 Use Permit and finds that the development exhibits Annovative design qualities and a balanced mix of Unit sizes And.types Lincoln Properties' proposes 14d oi`e=bedroom.units'of',the--total ". . 356 units ( 9%). This exceeds the :maximum nu!�6er of ane bedroom units by 19 units The desi jn Reip.0.4. Cok., ate,r discussed' this issbe;ofi' April �5, 1,990,and,indicated- that`they were not' apposed tG the proposed utiit mitt siree. .there. were d �•�r`Y e^ ( �Y� 4 PLANNING'COMMI$SIONj TAFF RERbRT V171-14630 a CUP d 90 0�5,,- 1 INC60 PROPERTIES.F ANY une 13, I990 z _ y , Page 3, _u �. also two ald three bed"room units and V nce,the applicantls r ;marketing iesear6h supported-=the Unix. See: Exhibit "G" forr the `_ app,l�icant s statetne of-un1t, ix justif,uatton: A;Resotut�ion J. ( has, 'been drafted );,nd is aiiached. 'recommending approval. of- It Conditional Use''Permit 90-05: / ' C. 0 asicivi Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel// Weinberger, : Coleman recommended approval of the project on,t+ ���17, �199, after initial: reviews `on April , 15 and May 3, '1990. The Committee recommended �hat'thA 'following revisions be made: 1. A mirtiimum 5-:foot-wide parkway should be, provided tietween A - the ,M1111k6n Avenue curb and sidewalk adjapent to "th �t right turn..deceleration lane 2. Concrete int6r)ocking pavers shouuld be.:-usad throughout;% Including the ae, within the parking 'counts.. -They shall also be. used in all area where sidewalks ardss drive aisles.' 3. The overlay presented at the Committee mee06�of May 7.1 IVYO, dep.icting ,the ped"triam'and monument signt-din the northeast corner of Milliken and Base Line.Road should be orov`iaed on the final plans. 4.1 Exposed a'ayri2gate should be used on.the 4_fo6t,pedestrian. MW trail. 5. Louvers should be-added wii:hin 'the- inset accent pifnted', ..areas< on the garages 'and 'the second-story insets 6n'the Building 500`elevation. 6: Additional detailing s;iould be explored > ise aroun � secon,, .s,rory window�}ihsets.'` ST rr COMEP17 fi'ems` 1-6 have been-:made cctyid tio,�5 �5r the Design Review ,approval.° ' 7. New drawings depicting gable ends a:nd a`'full file roof on the ,eight-space. carport, should4,be provided ;for.review.. Stucco ends were "also discussed` .for use: below the roof line. STAFF C0�4ENT;The Committee (McNi'e1, Toistoy, ,:Coleman)#, reviewed revised carport dulitions on May 17, ;7S.9O. The CommittaL°i recommended the fallawing t revisions 'be tide to�4the-carports: ri'1' 7 The, ends �should�be i fled nff to'match the,ends of the,yara Lr PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14630 & .CUP 90 d5 , LINCOLti PROPEEtTIES COMPANY June 13,. 1990 ^ . Page 4 (;b) All Carports facing Milliken Avenue '4 , shoutd be made '`rages. - (c) The six- 'and eight-space carports should have' fulT; file roofs With, small -gables s•: similar to. those on the,`carage`roofs. The above'three recammen4atiaas have,been {Wade, Condition 7 of approval. The new.carports are shown on':Exhibit "F-5 D• Neighborhood Meetings. °Th /moist ,recent nei'ghhorhobd ,meeting with City staff .present Was, held on May 25, 1,00._, staff briefly presented .the scope of the project to surrounding Victoria Gommunity.resi;dents and listened to the­concerns',of those in attendance At" that meeting; the residents expressed their"',oekern with --the project's acci,ss.i to Milliken AvenuQ,. the °\hree story buildings;' and the carports. The, residents ,stated their preference for ownership units over apartments, and�`�scussed ' concern. with traffic, crime, and property Values.' l�"�s,econd ;) meeting, with° the developer, in attendance -is -soheu.0 ;),for " Saturday,- June 9, 19901at Vkctoria,Groves Parka The.rdsults of that meeting will be presented in: staff's oral report on dune 13, 1990. 11. I- addition to the above mentioned,'meetings, the develbp� ' held three meetings kith the. ACTIVE 'homeowner's group` in. - Victoria -on 'August, 26, 1989, ;September' 13,' and on., September 281, 1989., These3 meetings were -attended by .04. ACTIVE representatives -s',well;`as other concerned residents prior- to the"proje<t's submittal:to the;City. E. Technical Review r' Vie• .Tire Committee':.has reviewed-0 j.' project 'and detiv neat with the recommeizded ,special ' ,conditions and attached °standard, conditions of approval the 'project is consistent with `all agplicabie„,^standards and, ordinances. ° '1. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Studyhas been cQ,ipl'eted by the'applicant. Part II of the Envi nmertal '•Checklist,.completed by staff found that although the prrucect " may.have si.gn1ficaft effect, on the' envfrpnment,"thece Will � o' not begt_a -'significant ,effect �in this case because the' . •m1tiga66fi measures identified,in the Initial $tgcfy have been added to the project approval.'. �T 1 � y� l: ,� �,r `'l •,� � is KANNIA f:DriirtISS7QN STAF-F',REPQhT VTT.1463Q & CUP O-O5 LINCOLN-�ROPEnTIE; COMPANY June 13, 1990 <t Page 5 The project lsaubjec to significant noise impact along Base Line` goad and Milliken Avenue. r A �• " cl= prelinjilhary acoustical- study has been, prepared which. ' identifies mitigation measures (sound barriers) needed to' bring the site "into . carfarmance. with City noise'iX• stand4rds. 'The project is designed without a perimeter wall along Base tine Road or Milliken Avenue. ;Therefore 'patios and, ill require their own sound, wall. Patio sound 4alls must be,,6 foot '5 inches ($: L RW on Base ' Lane'.Road) and. balcony sound walls must be 6 foot. (5 foot S inches on 13as� Line Road). The elevations as reviewed by Oesig"n Review Committee d.io=not address this eleirW t; " hence; a condition has been .added to,' gqr back to the ` Design "eview Committee prior tc, issuaacek:`of building permits.'' .A' final acoustical re'oart will be 'submitted r (Condition No. 9) .to identify,precise measures which mint be incorporated ip`o the final project design. 2. Schools On .June 1989, the City Counc,111 adopted Urgency Qrdinance,;Nq: 395 which,establishes a policy for. a condition to be„ laced on all -pendin .residential prof-cts, .to ensure adeqquate• '.schodl capa�,ity. This condition has been zaaddcfl.as'�,Planning DivisiEn Condition No°. 1, of the Vesting =Tentative Tract Res�`19tion of Approval. . 4. . 3. Pedestrian 5a'fety. ' The site is located" across�\Fhlliker;_i Avenue from the future Gity Central Park which,will tend to.draw pedetitrianaiacross that:heavily traveleO road;at Mid-block. Therefore; as a mitigatior. measure; .the applicant must, ,as a condition of, approval. (see Engineering Division Condition No. 1) reconstruct tt�e Milliken Avenue..,,median,' landscaping to discourage mid "r block pedestrian crossing. III. PACTS, FOR FINDINGS:' 1hi5 project is consistent xith the 1.Victoria =, Community Plan and the General Plan, and will `not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant. adverse impacts,. ;The .� proposed u_a, ,'building design, and subdivision: together-with all recomnendeI conditions of approy6l, i :iri complia-re With f '! applicable regulations of the Dev?lnpment Code and,tl a Vic. ' Community Pian a}. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: this. ear ing item has. been 64ertised fs a publ:tc h , li j n The Tn la nd;.Val Te��Da i 1 y;Bul l et3n newspaper, the_propel ty:has, been posted, and notices were seo,t; to.ail pro?2r*y awr►ers_within z 300. f€pt Qf=the pma ect site and iithin arr i ind.od notifti la zt5rs area. v fi3 hh , \vx PLANNING%COMMISSION STAFF REPt)Rt VTT 1463tl8�OCUP 90 05 LINO'OLN PROPERTLES'"GOMP,ANY Jude 13, 1Q Page 6., y RECOMMENDATION: In, t►iat dupingaa ,recent neighborhood meeting `oi May 25th.and a follow up mec�gig with the developer ondune,9th, � concerorm for the project .were, raised 6y- eurrounding resldent'sj�k 44j staff`woul'd 'recommend: that, this *l tter-tie continued�to June 27L'n to a11t,W staffi the Opportunity figs"aadrdts tho a concerns: However, should the' PlQnni,ngommtissier� €tirmine .that those ` _ issoes taised.zby th@.i^esidents havoabeen addressd in thr pro��ct as it 7s 'presently, `&uh�ntted, staff vtout ndvthat flann,ing Commis^idii 7a66, 6v�! _Vosting,Jenta.tive Tra'c't ��tr30, subject to tyie conditions of. apgxoval, tiIt pugh adopt»�i , the attached 4��olut on and!�.suance �f a',Negat}ue Dec7'aratio�n 1 a ' ^a a * ! Re!p ful zu rad RU /city Pla r. r =f BB.BN/ifs r J 1 _Attachments: Cxhi_bit "A01 = �ocatjon Map 6. Exhab' t "B" - Site�Pian , ExhA'v t ��C'� - Tent we Subdtvisicn tNap L Exhibit v . - Conreotuat Grading �T} t= Ex.Iib#t nEn Conce'�itual Lanscap. ng , Exhibit' Building Elevations. ` E hi bit " " Letter, Re uest n Conditional.Use Rci^mi r� g�� :vppwoval' , .Resoi,ution of Approval VTT 1463i7w�tf�'t;ond giant Rasolut:un of'Appr64al. 1"Tt I46'OxwyR with Gondi'tiont F ( Resolution•.of Approval CUF" nIG � a fit f r ta.-_..— F5 a�31 �' _ - . � L,"`•.w\! .Y ,�.,...s Pn el .. ..'.l �T"":.�n"J. _ 4 _ t FF_rmrc?iC1FJ FL ! i t � - r I CITY` Q R + I �:IrCAMONGA rrr�E a ye A 4 } itr 4:c 1 P,L1�N '�� a�'E �siCrI r Y T , �-'� ,�^� S EXHIF iT �" SCALE.•� ,� r —7777 Al 1. �/ !; 't' � p�•q� gt�� '2^2�.e. �� 1,21 zo tr ti 44 mac. ��.� �.r — _�r•�lDS >� -.i ,: • � Ei', �r u; •� � �.;'� � .1.��IJ I 56, ��. Yl�iIS VNOF�IQw14YJ�YQ WkA.� SF 4Qd t10pW�r.M4` ��� �� 'r EM' �'r c f1 T t 4TY 6F UCP►I ONGA L Tr 3 y y t J ~ �. .! l@(UL'�DESCRIPTgN a i, .`�cg' 6 �- -f � SUCH 7,uRrc t j P teyM ! •+. •s t u7 lk 11 Y If ✓',' ,Y t i��0.'ti%'.17 M 1'i�"'�r 7.A e q4 ..ids i - MOT' (VESTM TEWATiNE TRACT Ml4P} i TEr f. FLAN N7wrN ) EXHIPM. SCA�,F t ni I V i .r:i.- mcn 4q as � F n o I s Ask r F t _ sI•" ..i 4 w `ids -"y� TEI j 5 ,.t €� .� 7 � � �� �. � •,mot '+�,��, ` l s �•( S �1[11 LL� �• e 1 �9`r—� �� �\l I N J. All a �^� t E ^ice%.♦ � i \�.��r' 'p ,P' 5 ' — r ,.1 1c 4. `�_ 2-m. A - c _fit="_'t ��'Y--• _ r kl ri � TI'�CM IT Y :OF 1 LCAMONC..' - Pi�ANI fI1�I `019 SIbN TITLE MIKE' SCALE:,a3 F`��: „rem •,� P�'a,"�.�r:. + � 3 fit/ • � �' fAlf �� V in {Q Oi r r,•,,,, " `mod l - �! >.WI A ,war a® �d J I VAN-- �� Ws +� � I►��11t�y�,,t®I . r rY4': �l Awn � r �( ��'r �'��,t ,yr;��r iY�j "�e•�'yau��..:+,�...,t—�'i"'�a.tli!�l1 Y" yy1�� e 0 s, is s t S J n n n nn rtrt _ 5r�s i --CO4r- MTE-'TILE rpop, .m1t'Et!t.TKotJSL`F,t.�,atsTyR Ft�ilstl 4GC0'11f�.�PT(r(M B� Z� 02 Sao rt ,j UbAklD 'G ^TTI .B: 5ToN, EXHIBr.P .I. t A t( i, 4 , x . 1 r d 0*4cRera's'ri�Q Rain :.� ._ � � F1GOLi FA'�-^.lid S.0 NrLR 4+i0� � .�' •. hO UCAMONG ism C, 4YE4[G TQOS:7CL 6,1.iaOTER FM14i{,� �. 5�•--��JLu000�I,1tW�TRAM .�.b a 1 i TrMEi� r�iri� PIJ�NT RN(r t , nT^_t �s uc garg E ROe1 ��� 3T0�d TIRaumL P7:F 4T6R�.i�N571 c .J•v`/.�~I'�` � -n. u ° _ ���:..�, it ' .�• :. '..:. � .Asa +.� �.. 7 >.� ....r•.. - � �`�. RAWN r CITY I^ UCAC�N�GA t� I.E�i��IN �'17� SIGN TITLE EA'HIB1T '� SCAL Ore, F lrl v,y 1 ( � YI l I' (f i, ' of r.� I b 1. h ��t MOP R►.DCGA- O��C.L 7QOi1tL PGS@THFC YW I�SII. .•i AWN '� r—aJr'Qceo iJRw.�7R�M,::'A• � C rt I „ 1`PY tOF ; ;UCAMONGA t.. PLAN ISIC?N TFFti& . a s 'ft� r. = y <k i 1 '„�M!'>� �t .".a�..Q.•S�N,�.�+"1 � .S�'i' ,1���);:yl' ,s�llllllli��li��iiit IF.s1ys��,itrtli';?. r BAR G S t11�1 1 1 ,� uil • ......RI. ' .u9..• ii1111i"i�4�! '!tn- 1 llifl s't:'tH9AU ivli� : ,t . �A i, i } e�ass O� _I �� � wi11 CARPORT S � =Gt��ATION F3L G- iu t LINCOL"1PROPERTY COMPxrY _ _.. Febrriary 26, 1990 z. L" jjI Mr. Brett Horner . City Platuti ng Department = =i City'of Rancho Cucamonga 3920-C Baseline Road. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 M. Conditional Use Permit/&iseline,and.t3i �,Iten rmury Crxm5= n;un Co6uafty Dear Brett.- Per your request, attached, is a,`City' of Rancho Cucamonga's tepartnent of Community Development/Planning. Division's uniform application° (Condiaarial Use Pernat), and a check for .$399.00: The, above mentioned, Conditiaial Use Permit is requested in order to alluut tsi to, develop the'kind,o`!.community on the mite that oa_Market research indicates will 1, mnok successful.in thi~z 1-1-ation. In our review of the demographics, of the v !rancho Cucamonga areal it oec,:;ae apparent to us that there' is; an inc;;e(,ling number of young professional people in the community' who desire high, quality multi-family housing with extensive amenities. k large percentage of tine young professional component of the ma,ket d�tnand will be single people who desir= to live alone, or young married couples without any children.- BOO of these market groups vi11 occupy one bedroom homes and ii t two' or three � bedrooms. Typically the young? single persen..that, occupies .a, two 'bedroom"home is, a roommate situation which is often done.,"for reason^ Z` econot,y The taxge'� , market for our property will, be. those yo=g single indi.",d -a' wao, have..the, disposable n=,e to afZoru a orwe bWt:oow,i6r wittYuulC"a roatm�te .This redLces the overall demand for two bedroom,, and i'Ureases the nunber of one bedrooms, that we feel comfortable incorporating into the con%iiu.ty. Our request is not to da,velo'" a comii= y{ equ p tx that is dspr000�tionately skeY gt•from one product type to the other, but rerely to accommodate what va feel ve "be the, growing component of up:r..ale, dwa,.a in the area, as,.the office ark ustrial, markets around Rancho Cucamonga mature. -thtr community,has been careful'r' planned r� to provide moth family aloes"ana-areas for young couples and sst41e professioilaZ people.. In doir 3' so it is'our'feeling.that a .larger percentagi� of;the total- people. demand in the area will require one bedroom'apar ts• than C'it�r standards currently allow. If you examine the demog aplucs of-the City off,"Ranchp;C.�camonga , over the ten years, the meclian age of. the populataon has nerd getting �,- orogressive?u younger. ,This further corro� rates,our "market cancl.us;ons fo the a � � A +330,fa JWla Wiagr Drive ,'§Wt an Diego.,California 921,i2 ;619)452.5911 FAX(619)��S$ r A ` le Brett Horner ebrt � 26, 1990 G Page 2 of 2 . It is far these,reasons that i�e,?xe requesting` this`t'�nc3itional Use Permit �We axe only reque^t%ng a 4% 'increase -in the perdentage of one beCaoams,,for e entire cp=mitY, ,and this increase is being>tequested 'ta_.altov'us. to better. SCr ce- our ti=et;'u`arkei. WX will be pleased to°.inswer.any,questions .that yo}�:night leave. tuink you. Cti Respectfully suImitted; ? SOW PROP=Y Ca AW,13.C., xNC. We C�r1Ck i Director Of,UevelOpWt u r s � 6�® to � / CITY OF;RADlG3[O QUGAMON.,GA ' = t DATE: August $, 1990 f a> TO:- Chairman and_ kbers of the'Planning' Cormi"ssinn FROM: Brad ,Sglaers.Gi,ty Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner„ SUWECTc ENVIRONMENTAL"ASSESSMENT AND:CONDITIONAL.G,E PER14IT.90y`'22 LAPIN,'::'CROUSE & COHIPANY, The request to, permit .?an account:tng office use!to am,8,339,"square 'foot" bui;ldi'ng art 4I. ages of `land rn. the General Industrial 'District, ; Subarea"gig of:the Industrial Specific Plan,„located at r 10763 Edison Court - 'APN: '209-142-,67. I. PROJECT AND SITE.DESCRPTION: A: Action Reguestedi ;Approval. of a nori-constructionrC6nditiona7 Use Permit for an„accounting office.use and; ,issuance of :a, Negative Declaration, k 81: Aoolibahle Regulations. : The IndustriaE' iegific"Plan permics professional_%design servides An Subak-6: �5►tb ect to,;approval of a Conditional;,Us' Permit. °'4 b C, surrounding Land Use and Zonna ' North. - Industrial-.Park;".General In� ktriaI ;(Industrial , Spec`ific'Plan, Subarea;,8) South Industrial"'Park, General. Industrial'(Industrial Specific 'P1,3n, Subarea 8? y East : - Industrial Park; General Industrial,-(I`ridustriai - J; Speci TIC 'Plart, Subarea West ' rndustrial' P<lrk General Industrial (indu trial F, ,Specific. P161 Subarea 83 ' t D„ General Plait' Oesignations " Project Site General Industrial North - General Industrial South' - 'General""Industrial „•; h' East General .Industral West"` - General` I'ndusti°iaT E. Site Characteristics The site is'oc*UpleCjby an'.exist ng ljght' Jndustrilal but3dinq parking"area and landscaping k`. ZTZM H J , ,r` PLANNINf CdMMISSIdN ttn,-f REPORT CU " , P 96-:22---CAPIN,'�CROUSC & ,COMPANY': AUGUST;8,.199d,,., . page 'Fo Parkina� Calculations Numker of �gber of Type Square ', Parking Spaces spaces, of Use Foot" age RatYo Required' r ;�ded dffice 3;f67 1/250 15. i5 +� 4tarehuuse . 467 I/IOOd. 5' S r " Total 20, 2d U. ANALYSISr yj A:. General.: .the applicant.is proposing to`use a,light inaustr 'al buillding-aS`�,.tha.off�ce..Fbr an accouating4irm. They but]di'ng 4 currently has.11•,082- sq>"are :feet of 'offic,e .a. a,; which is: typical foie: this type of budding,`. The 1proposed conversion' , wily-increase the, square footage devoted to'"of filce area ,to 3,667' 'square feet; 3f stfsn 8,339 square�root?bu i Mng: he remalnrng floor,area'will be used or parking°andtdpy Storage. only; .• In order 'to comply with the: Development Code's: parkin requirements, a total of;.20 park,zng'spaces rust be,provided ' Seventeen spaces Cu&en't yw exist un-sitea. .and` 3 additional spaces are p�opased w thin'the warehouse-area, of the'bnildl This ,firm 'pray.ides-audit.'and_copsultfng services t6 charitable non=profit organizations. ..•The applicant. has, stated t1hat due to the:,nature 'of their buslness.,, 70-$4 percent'o' ,the fiarmfs fork is conductbd ,at ci their,' ient'!,,off ices.;., The firm does not provide bookkeeping services or have.a heavy tax practice; and therefore, generates very little traffic 1 3. Office Use The basic,premise.of all zoning is the separation of .incompatible uses;. Subarea .8 is zoned For General Indisstri`ai activities and is intended'prtmarily for industrial :II type users.` Typical industrial uses•-permi,tted,Wo6l'd 'incl'tide custom and �.1 fight'_manufacturing, Se6ndat�y� uses,::, sac@::'as ' •� professional/design services'= (i.e., - accounting.firx,sy=, m, be permitted subjzct to revt,ew and, approvaI :of,� Condit Use Permit. r The building was:designed. for industrial users., _kh raises a broader issue;of, whether mare intense­ofF1, type lend uses, ` such as an. ,accounting firm,,are appropriate-`to�Idzite Withan areas intended for;manufaG�uring., Office uses generate higher, traffic vdlumes �r'ia Geliiand greater amounts. of park�hg than a t PLANNING COMMISSIOtJ 'STAFF REPORT., CUP 90=22 - CAPIN, .CROUSE & CdMPi6NY t.,UGUST' 8," 199© Page 3' h industrial• uses. Because.:of the.,higher parking requirements, the: applicant>proposes. 'to convert interior floor area 'to , t.. parking. ,`In the pa�t,._the issue of indoor,.parking, for light industrial' ,buildings t,As been, approved through the ,Minor 06 velopment.Revie6t -rocess I, C. ,environmental Assessment Upon review of."part =, .of the nJt1a u y. an comp etion of Pavt .2" of.the'.Environmental Checklist, staff. 'has found no,ifg" ficant impacts related' to the'propo'sed use: fi III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS The Commission'must 4'make all the foll6wing, n ng n;or er. o•approve this'application: . Y I. The.propose`d.use i,s in accordance wit-the Gerera7 an {a tl and the:,objectives of„ "the Deveiopint. Code, , and 'the purposes of,the Industrial-Specific Plan;Subarea in ieillch .the site.is''l ocated - 2: That ' he proposed use, will .not:;be detrimental. to the, pubi,ic health, safe wel fare or..materially injurious' to properties or."�impro"veme;t����irt '.the wi%init'y 3. That the proposed' use '-`L plies with each of%: the � applicable provisions of the°fndu5trial:.Speci'fic Plan.-- IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Thisatem has becrt'advert s�d as"a,,Oublic hearing in e n an Palley Daily B±�llet;n newspaper a,!!d property posted, an no ces sin o. a scan property,owners within 300 feet of the project.. V. RECOMMENDATION:+ Staff recommends° that the P1.ahning` Commission approve on onil Use ,Permit 90-22 through' a opt- of .:the I attached Resolution 0 Approval and" issuance' 'of:. aI .Negative' Decla ation: R 1y s ed, r k' Bu1 City nner BB:SR:mig Attachments: Exhibit'."_A' - Letter from Applicant Exhibia "B" = Location Mane Exhibit "Cl' Site.Pla�/F1oor,Plan Exhibit_"D" Y1 Chi ty Map Resolution of Approval ' �r F ' 'City of Rancho Cucacunga Building-:0erartaant Rea Cond :lonaT Opt/Permit Por Build Out'gf Interior improvements' a" Propeptq Adds 10736 Edison Court �dpn, Dear Sirai' !. Cr®apse It is sry'des to,purchase the build { lOOBt@d $t 10735'$di90A ti. 4�CO- Couri ,rc*Bietgw Devalopmant. The'building.currently Laa,A8 460 ceknF,ED square toes with`17 parkia g spaces. Tbpsm,ia ovrrrent4..,i m Pueuc square te®t built out Se+tba Interior. Our desire is to inereaoe +ccouNTANTs the total office,square footage'to 3667 square feat which;ttiYi i PLAN qI - 1990.INLAND EMPIRE _entlil bullding'an,addltl�tsal�2t8S aquare'feet oi^offices BpSo@. euro sulTEuo This.would-inolude;mod the esiat imBrovents oNTnmo , Yid ing interior cAUFoa Capia, Crouse & Co is a CFa tirm that providca.'audit and: ?I4!9b9_= consulting sarviQ4s to.ohsiStaD7�o nonrproflt orgsnuatiouo: Duc FAX 714(9B0.42Z4 to'the;nature oP j� a aerviq@a'that'we:prov da, .batxceari 70'x:'and-80b- � { of our,.lock is de_aa"at our client's otn' and not at'P. ofPi!s®. AFFILIATE OFFICES , a orrrAmo.cA This tMans that OBxr.staff drS�a.Ya ovc of aAt�a:C Pioes cad?unrks:: vn+EATON;ii Cher® and gany ti�Qia only-qua"po our otfioe t°.eir'2,til q;a imeax.; EMTCARMELIL Capimz ih•aaae &.Co d96—not provide.book8eapii cervices'or have INOLINAPOJS.IN a,heavy tax'practice, both.-:of which.would require clienta,aomisg WASHINGTDN.DC. ' int0 Our OPPSBe:.' �3`ba91D'm1A1mGY''.OliePat.t;FaPfiQ,'..Dp the'D$tL�PO OP.; the organizations that ens erork isttti., .' Capin, Crauao & Co. Qurreatly has eight fu7 time emplopeeQ Four of thoae iizoiweea-are out-oP the-office`b;tweon 7QA Wand 80% of the'time. it Capin, Crouse & Co hsa been in'ax stonoe sffi op®a', Led ias else OAtario area for ton years.' I am.the.ouaer-oP Ca�IA, Crouse & CQ:` and have lived 1A :lR"eho CuoasoAp{a Pnr'�twolga pearl Our'offi� n...re'are betwaein bs00:q and';5s00 p5u.,`2ksndaip through Friday. '9ased on`tho exiatia` psaraing ralloa aid Che proposed.,bgild,out of the.spare,;►aq wtll bead m':parking spaces ' PrOmeatly 1T-.are provide#. He ar0,prepoaia�havisig two ot;t1.1 ,., . Parking'apsees inside'tha:ware cues apace,13 is shoirn,on the spaQc plate. .The'War (me,specs`x311 be w®iat'.Por drg';sCorag®,only. Fla V" oPerations;or aotigitiea ei11 ba Yaappxsi in tlie'-iiai�nhouse. The facility, that ws:are hopiag'to puromutIi in.3d 1 Par oqr tppe.of,±rock.' Siaoeo'ar®paper atefieieo � Hoed atorago`.apaoe,;whieh thiis'apaee 4i11 ,.' provide♦ Rhis Paoilitp will alao,be>�ro:acceptable for t!® glionts t};at`ue asrlTe, priamrilp,ohar3tablo�reAn prQ„ � 3rg>eai,stiQasb-" tr We lQoi'Pox card t,r,`,.getting'..Lht�f Qon$ifiomly"sa'perslt Ssaued as'soon as v popoible. If,you base'any ques$ioam plaaae lot�5`kaow.` 'cure.Truly, Dale A. Overholt, CPA Pr,rtnar DAOtjw I-TY'`®F hl 'CU£AMONGA► i'T�1'rI: T •J / S ' c4 M {^ M - g NG DMSION '1°gt'LE: �ra�tAt-0 VH It IT"r SCAt.E: t .f �y. !'t pRbpa l,E A pill Em „" E1irrANSfOH 4 , S��CF �� i'" tX r i � R+ e }- ar 9� ' Opple-,{�Dl F _ h I _ x r `fk CITY -C T RANCHO U APVIONGA PtNlATG�DIAi�i' x r'Ifff{Ln r ''�' t ,.. a, ..� TiAS7ti���.. � �`�a7\.J'LS� •�: 3 , xZ L V C a 51 vatlHM t 1 tir 1 $ a ,z t _a ,1 ��f{'1 EErfrnAt FAarc c}I� �,T,'c� ?� T s •� 0 rr t 3 r y OJUAWAH vfr tt^. BASELINE, < CI �C(F :i G Y I Ia6wW 6 N t 7AOMY rl SURI ! t !f ru u; biT rAl0 A410 A - '4 > r Wlo`t7 1Y '.'IYMnO �'�_ 1l1. l t/.s.4�r�. i w ❑ SS e e N HMS a 5, tl S( - CaRP4,f 1l[1 iti f R w TV Y }NEW y � ASNiU ST OCK sr p KSTP__ W d3f e �4• ffr"n PA PX _ 1 '' B Hao G tow FOOTHILL ( Im LVD es A; r AWerua a } g sraiV NAMItI°RI y i 1IE®Oi, A,cm., �< •L. },...�6 uwaia�:iMTt.WN�YK lit is lnn y� tt,�t �f ', yA.,•�:r�`t .II w°r oTa!w ; > .. >, aN 1 .u.rowl • �C•$ ,. I/Mill"il iR.nw N R i< - s I I Aii'n Av -(1'I•y n R.IKMOIn[crn • _. 9""-h m.r►va?°a- fond A W'1 r 1 Y' R9._.a� �I r finnlow°" gam_{I WW ; rra TH itv !TH SEE y Al T !. s 1 a 15 v ACf N H < cc ilgfan N-CR pilr D 11Ta'.• ` `� D ..91"llwtA Or R 1` t- vct $ l rOfYueOR < - < rCtYI°iprn r r"- C'I OFAANC O,ICUCAMONGA' Pg.ANNING't?MSI 'V? r yye RESbEw"i0N No. A RESOI U,ION !W THE;4'PI,ANNING COMMISSION, OF THE,CI3Y .OF, RANC1i0�'GUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVY.tG CONDI7IONAL_US;E PERMIT ND. 90-22 FOR�AN,OFFICE AND.!,COMINISTRA7IVE USE;.II4 ' A L .GH7:��I0USTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED, 107:¢3 tois,UN COUt2;i IN -THE' GENERALTNDUSTRIAL'.-DISTRICT,, SUBAREA:.8% OF .7HE INDUSTRIAL SP°CIF1C PLAN, AND MAKING 'F,INDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF`7 APN:: 209-142 67 " i A. Recfta'ls, r 5 ' (i) Capin, Grouse .& Company has filed an applicaiion for the f issuance of the GonI tional Use Permit No. •9O 22 as.described iri the title.of I this Reso,dticn. Heeeinafte'. in `t`his' Resolutlon,'rthe subject Conditional Permit request is ref_erred to �s "the, ap licatio P .. (ii) On the 8th da} 'of August 1990, the~slanning Comission of,the City of Rancho Cucamonga-'conducted:.'a ;duly noticed public hearing' ors the application and, concluded .said hearin.'g•on.that date. All legal prerequisites prior,to the adoption of this Resolution --have occurred B. Resolution, NOW., TkEREFURE-, n is hereby found, d'etermmed, :and resolvers by the Planning "Commiss on-of the,City o+ Ranchb,tbeamonga'as fo,i;]ows:�, ,' � C 1:' This Commissiori' ,hereby sped fieally finds that a.lj`of `the facts set forth in the,'Psditals, Parxt tk,-pf this.Resolut on are :true,.a,qd correct 2. '' Based upon substantial evidence 'presented, to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing on August 8, '1990, including'. written and ,oral staff .reports:, :`together with , Buhl c: testimony`;;, this :!,, jm Commission heretiy specifica7ly`finds,as follows.`.; ' �? =` (a) The-: application: appi es t0 . property r'located at`: 10763 Edison Court with a .street:frontage of J3,5 feet•, and .Sof .depth of 120 ��feet.and is prpsent.ly inproved-With:a fight industrial' building,'.and (b)' . The property to,sthe 'north dfi the. .sub3ect site industrial park, the. prop,.erty to the: south of "'that 'site consists industria .��l park; �prPty.','to . th:e east' is,,, industrial' park, ;and the:` property to the west is an industrlal,:park : e 0 That the,appl oat on'comtemplates the operation of'a light industrial: building es an office for an`accounting firm..'. 4x AU a. 5 z .- PLANNING,;COMMIs lron.RESOLUTION N0. ✓ CUP-90-22 LAPIN,' GROUSE & COMP_pNY AUGUST 8„i9,SO ?age 2 (d) ' ""That adequate. parking is,�available at the sites s'. Ba'scd upoi- the substantial evidence presented'to'this Camn'i,Ssi," during the abgve.'referenced pub'1i`c hearing.,and upon<"tho specific findipgs of facts set forth" i'n in 1 and 2`above; thIs.Commissioq hereby finds and. elude c in s=as follows (a) That;the' proposed use is :in acedrd w'ith;+ the•Genera l ""Plan, the abjectives" of the Development Cade, and the purpases .of the.,`district in which the site is aoc�ted = " (b), That, the-~proposed' use,; together. With the; .candit�ons applicable-thereto, will: not be detrimen*al to the<public health, safety, o' welfare, ,or materially injurious to: ..propertles�or,' improvements -in the v� inity': t (c)' That 'the propased'.,use complies Faith each of the applicable •provisions`of"the Development (d) That the proposed use complies with each of the ay 1icab1e Provisions of the"Industrial Specific .Plan: 4 . This `Commissi.on hereby :finds a•nd certifies a03 "the=prttjec� bar. been reviewed aqd considered in compI in',,� with the �iWifbinia EnviVdhmen,tal , Quality Act. of 1970 "and, further, this Commission;hereby issue's alNegative Declaration. ' .. 5�• Based 'upon the findings and"'conclusions set forth ;in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commissjo"u hhereby`,aporoves the"zpp':icatlon sybjgct to each and"every"condit.on set forth below. 'Appeoval ,,"of this request shall h not wad e comphanc`e with any seetiaans of h ~Tndustra: Area , 1rSpecific Plan` or any, 'other Ity Ordinances." (b) ; Occupancy of.,the-,,facility .sha'l1 not" commence" until. such titre 'as a"I Uniform'BUiTding:"Copp, and State ne Marshall',s ;regulatiehs-ha+tQ_bee complied wiili Pri+ir tn'occupancy,?Mans shalt be submitted to he-''Rancho.`.wucamonga . Fir"e Protection District and- the:Building and 5a.fety t , Division to show compliance.. The,",buildin5 shall._' bQ •inspected' for 'compl.iance� prior "to occupancy. , 4 .. (c) 'The.three' indoor: parking. spaces' shall:be the standard 9 feet '"by 19, foot and the `minimum C1Qar;backup distance shawl be 2u feet: r^" t f , RESOLU�ZON '-I G�MMz55IDN CPU & CDMP�Y .,PL�NN1G I CAF °i+ i•. CUP 22::I996 AUGUST B+` s s.-Page 11 rr shall : be square foutagu ce office a4,a the balA The total {are' feet, . used Ys1r „ 1im!ted, building. `shall be t�o11 of the_• stora9e. the adop -a warehousin9/ . Commission shall certify to l Sec:retary, to this �Y 6. The x �: s Re ,1'ution,. this ADOPTED THIS 8 TH AUGUST A- DAB pF „ APPROVED AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMISSION OF,TNE CITY OF 1j' "`PLANNING BY:wry T. Niehairm t� ATTEST: Secretary the City of Rancho grad gullet+. °f elu an pinnin9,Commiss�Resolution. was �� th. - ai1.n9 \ `of the. of foreg Comm' held' s Bu11er,' Secretary i#� that ,the b, .the Planning Cndmnsslon Brad "�cert tad Y I, do hereby and ad°P o f the Pl wit n9' :/( ` Cucamonga, assed., regular meeting vote to regularly in Of at a' the foll,owin� . . G;ty of Rancho :of Aug�l t''199as by on the 8th ` AYES COMM�`S1ONERSr NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS;• zi s 1 1i 3 t 1 :Y ��� r 1y[ 1 1 ( t August. 7, 199.0 j: ` -- Y� City of ucamonga ;Rancho C r 10500� Civic Center Drive. F.O. Bot"807 Rancho Ccamonga, California 91729 r � RB: 20 Apartment Units ? �C Sierra-Madre-Avenue:- Rancho .Cucamonga" ' DR #88-03 APN #207-251-22 Dear This'letter comes` to kyou'with a request for.-"your support''of our' project's time extension. This project was approved'by_you,-I-n.Augusi 1988, aAt that:,"time we were 1,granted approval of 20 apartment uniti, aL the,Fead of Sierra Madre, Avenue in"an area very much on the .ceec Qur project, south of` 9th Serest just;-,east' of 'Grove Avenue, wasr' c^*iditioned' upon obitainiiig approval for�,xiany standard planning, - building, and engineering items. It is, however, one very eXtreme' ' condition that has created a great hardship. At the time of our original ,approval, we�were conditioned to„pay and obtain dedications on. thiee parcels to.,the north�.of our project.7 for street improvements.: We were also conditioned to -"fully l*Irove. the cuY-de-sac\ intluaing but ntt limited to- curb;_guttei, sid"ewalk asp td/base;-�street lights; "landscaping/iron , sewer-and storm drains. We, were also,, required .;�`coffipleterigati: an,'"eis'ting street. to the east, making,that athde-saq. compete as-well;;' These unusually'expensive:conditions,werp_ placed:on this,,, a very small project, requiring us 'to bear.the uaprouement costs of•- ,Y.122,000'-00, as well as several"thousand dollars far "tine. actual land ac uisition. After 'two q years,, we are still'conC,irauing negotiations on one remaining strut dedicationfar*laest."to '.the nort�r� Cry ` �7.. +S r 0 C) F Page Two" In ,closing, we ask.that you support,tlis e�erension of,time,but retain the original conditions of,appraval. We'are,very;concerned that.-the- ram adaitionaI.- conditian referring tc".ordinaric,e number 95- adding �rmther $48.'000 00 to a dcyelopment �inurida+:ed with unexpected hi,''her costs "due to several condi'tions`;.of �pprovai, create a ',nega Iva financial:,posimon for a prevsously-negor�iated , - loan and investor package,in place. Thank you for }aur tee anc�.cons deration We-look f rwar'd to your c r` help and support as "we r; r ve tow id's,appxoval and co o1 't* Yours very truly A. E. SMITH ST A. E, Smith 1. ti �, trrttt If l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F ^REPOR ,' .i..: .DATE: August:8, 1990, fi0: ;;,,Chairman and Members of the 'Planning Commission r! FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Derry C-uarracino, Assistant Planner'' 'SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR AND DESIGN REVIEW 89-03 - A.E. SMITH-- The development of -20 apartment :units on. 1.08_ acres of land in the Medium High Residential D�stri.ct (14-24 dwelling units .Per acre) located at theNnd --if-SierraMadre Avenue, waast.of Edwin Street - APN:, at: 1 n2 I. BACKGROUND: Design ,'Review '88-03 ,was originally approved on' AugOV17, 1988, subject to'_all of the conditions set. forth in Planning Commission Resolution Nos 88-117 (attached). Design Review 88-03 is due ta' expire'on August 17, 1990., The Development Code Section 17.02.100B, states that extensions may (upon making certain findings) be granted in 12-montu increments, not to exceetl a total of 4'years from the original date of approval. The =% applicant is currently requesting .a'one-year time extension Which would expire on August-17, 1991. Required Findings: Section 17.02.100B, states ,that the Planning Commission may ;extend_ he approval of a project if the following findings can be made: 1,. That there has been no significant changes In' the_land use element, 'Development Code, or'character of the area within which the ,project is located that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming,. 2. That the granting of an extension should not he. detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially ;:injurious to properties or improvements in the 'vicinity: II. ANALYSIS: Staff has: analyzed the' proposed time extension and compared the proposal with current physical development criteria outlined in the Development` Code, Based on this review, . the ' approved project meets the development standards of tine•.Medium, High Residential District. .ITEM I=,' i v �' I O PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88-03 - A.E. SMITH AUGUST.8, 1590 Page 2 however,, the project is inconsistent with, Urgency Ordinance No. 395 pertaining to the evaluation of adequate school fac.iliti_es v for proposed residentia-T development. Said ordinance was adopted on June 7, 1989, approximately 10 months after the approval of Design Review 88-03. The City Council through the adoption of Urgency' Ordinance No. 395 has expressed . concern with the maintenance of orderly and balanced development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Accordingly,"to protect the integrity of the development process; to assure continued development stability; and to protect the public health,;safety and welfare, the City Council adopted said ordinance whigq requires the imposition of the following condition of approval to ensure that adequate 'school facilities will be available to serve` proposed residential developments: 'Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of'a M_llo-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide in conjunction with the applicable School District for the, construction and. maintenance of necessary school facilities. However..,if any School District has previously established 'such .�z -Community facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior, to the issuance,:of building, permits. Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within 12<months of the date of approval of the time extension and prior to the issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and,void." The applicant has, indicated to staff his opposition to the addition of the above-mentioned condition, due to economic considerations. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS; The following findings are provided for the Commission s Gonsidera°tion. s. 1. The provision of adequate school facilities is necessary to protect the public fie `th safety and welfare. 2.. The proposed .time extension, with the addition of the school impact mitigation condition required by Ordinance No. 3951 is consistent'with the Municipal Code. , IV. CORRESPONDENCES This item has been advertised in The Inland. Valley Daily Bulletin hewspaper as a public hearing and notices to all property owners within 3O0 feet of tht project site ,r P�AHNi�G C4P� ION S AFF�REf?:dRT r a DR 88-03 ,iA,5 TH' AUGUST.8,"1990` - -- Page 3 r V. RECOMMENDATION: diStaff recommends",that •th@ 01anti��ng CommtissXon ' grert a 'one-yeas time=extension fpr, Desig�i Review 88�03; t�►rough the'`�doptyon -Ipf the attached Resalutionx which iliciudes thc ,�, additional 'co ndition as:required by,,Urgesity;Ordinance?95. o. Re5p ►y Submiteed Bra u: r City P an Or BB:JG:mlg �^ n. Attachments: Exhib}t "A" letter from''- App icant Exhibit "8"' location Map Exhibit "C Site Plan, Resolution=Pid 88•.II7 f�esoluwion of Approval ' I' } Y!' r 77� tv t ! t �- 1 JJJ June iM vo Oty.of 'Rancho Cucamonga � ? 1O500-Ciil c_ Center _Drive Rancho Cu^amonga,'-C4 917 o Attention.: Planning-.Depav-+merit RE Expiration o�1'Enviroximental Assessment '> and'Develo�rn iit Review $S-Q3 . A '�,�a1 0 e P ,q { ) ;_ y To m It May Concern:' This letter is a reques"t. fore extension'-of the alcove referenced_ ; project Due to ex t ensive civil .engineering and plait cf,Leck Processing. Please feel free to'call of qou have any questions or;regL3ire additional information. Thank''you. s sincerely, ''.� A.E SMITH CORP(' ON ^ - a - x= Alan'E. ''Smith Sun-Ray Enterprises _ a � dtc i �� c_ C3 GEL NORTE AVE, :I PI r1 j VINM0.R- r7' A VENUE 2 _ L EL.GORAOO AVLC, s� N„ i SIERRA. MAGRE rI VENUE It Humwcor AVE, LA ' GLENN AVE. .� .J STREET "�,j11�`-' I� H � i L-t' L- �y rL'•J7�I-a.� U�` ti 1 1 '"a 7-7 , ----- ,y „ 5 } `r} 6 =!7 i _® vaRu. Cam, r is + ` 96 f 7 7 7d0 A81WTl1RNT UUM, I G G�r: ff'�AWA NCCRB{VR" , °' `• : AaMCri6 CtICAHONda.Ci 1 low- 11 ��ti RESOLUTION NO 88-117 A RESOLUTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION t APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. N0. . 88-'031 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT-OF A,.ea UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON 1..08 ACRES OF LANDIN T4iE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED: AT THE TERMIhUSF,S%OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND MAIN,STREET ; y R� A. Recitals.. (i) Alan Smith hats f}led an .aoplItation for thC=_pproval of Development Review. No. 88.03, a$ _described ,in -the title of this:. Resolution. Hereinafter in tfgis,'Resolution, the ,subject i3evelopment .Review reglest is referred to as "the,application ". (ii) On the 22n'd Hof' June a.1988:'the Planning Commission ofthe City` . of Rancho Cucamonga conducced' a-meeting on the appi'i,cati,on and' concluded said, meeting'on„that date.;, (iii), All leg al 'prerequisites to the adoption of this Resatuti`an . have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it` is hereby found, .det0mined.and ''resolved,by the Planning Commission of the City.af Rancho Cucamonga,as follows; V. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the T'acts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, ;of this.ResQlution_are true:and.correct, 2. Based upon substantial ev#dence, presented to this..Cammission during the above-referenced -meeting on. June 22,i 1988,: including written and oral staff.repprts, this Commission' hereby spe�r�fically finds" s follows: ('a) The application applies to property' .:lo"cated at the terminuses of Sierra t4adre-Avenue and Main Street and is.present1y vacant,;-=and (b). The property to the north:`east, and west rs.desigiia*ed' for residential uses. The property to,the north`end 'east i"s developed with = single family -residences., ' The property- to the wes. is developed ,with a condominium project. The property to the south is designated add>developed. . with railroad tracks operated by.A.,T.,& S.F.; and (c) The project,.with the recommended conditipns cif, approval, complies with all minimum deveicpment standards of the "City �-,offtRan�ha . , Cucamonga; and (d) 1he deve opament of 20- apartments on 1 08`acres of hand )s co'nsistent. .�witf+. the Medium`-High`_ v ential' land use. designation of thv� Development Code and.the ,&Cnernl plan I y r i r 4 y` PLANNING COMM`.ISSION. RcSOLUT'10N NO,� DEVELOPMENT .REVIEW .B'843 -.ALAN SMITH k June 22, .198$ " {� Page 2 �t' J 3. nased ;,ipon the substantial evidence presented to this Comm' ss on during` the ,above"eafnrpnced netting a`nd`-upon' the specific find;ngs, of facts set., forth'..!n paragra`ti� I anc+ 2 above', this "Commissian: hereby finds.,and " concludes as f611 ows: r (a) That the proposed project is°"consistent 'with, ji the objectives"of the General Plan- and ' .. (b) That he proposed use is in accord with the objective of the bevelopment Code . and' the purposes+ of the •district in: which•;tfe si to i s- located;`and . ` (c) , That the proposed-'use, i i,n compl i ante 'witth each' '.af. the appl1cabie ,.pro visions `af the Development .Coder"and (d). That , tie, propose use, , together• with' 'the. conditions applicable thereto,.•'wilI not be detrimental to the "public health,: safcty, or., .welfare,' or,materially injurious to properties a improvements` in the; vicAmty, 4. This Commission herebly finds.and certifies that the ,project,has been reviewed and consi"dered in .camplland with the California. EnVironmentai Quality Act .of 197D' and, 'further, this Cpmmisslon'.hereby ssues'a ,Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 "and 3 above, 'this Commis ion hereby .approves the application subject to ei; h and every condition set- 'forth -bOow _and "it's the `attached . Standard Conditions attached hereto and inc porated herein by thiS reference. . .,'• " Planning DiJision (1) A, spafjacuzzi shall be provided: The: location, size, and design 'shall be: reviewed and approved by the Design Revrew COWittee prior'to•the'i mance of, d building permits. (2} The roof.:"eyebrNt" on.:,the real- elevati on. of the garage shall ,:be' enl;ar.ged to be mope i`;n stale-_` pith the building or "shall be. eliminated. The pl'ans :hall be revi.- ed .and approved by the City Planner.' prior to the' ssuance of,building permits. '3,) The following, terns°shal Iie,i rcorpora,ted.into the .' final_ landscape -plans vlhich are•subject to review,, and . approval ' by. "the City .Pian'ner prior .to the issuance of O'ojding,permits: PLANNING COMMISSIGrI.RESOLUTION 41p, ;DEVELOPMENT REVIEW'88-03 -ALANI SMITH Jusie,22, 1988 Page 3 s (a,} ;Accent 'treatment s Hal L' be-.provided at the . entry off'Sierra;Madre Avenue.` ((b} ,`Extensive`,1andscaping °shall be:, provided:; a1on .the.site boundaries, particularly the' north.-and, -boundaries, ' (',c} A sample of the te'turized 'pavement , inaterial. '%hall ;be`submitted, (_d) V decorative, block walla -shall ,be ",provTcled' along..the .south•'propertyt ine5 V4 raucfht a.. iron fence with decorat�vx, block pilasters` ar a ,recorative' blockiva11 shall he " •`�, required.„along the north property line:, In ad'dttion,, th- ex,isting walls. on the "east; and .west shall 'be`'upgraded 'co `provide 'atz decorative. treatment,`:such as.stucco'with a,, t: decorative (e) The limits of any easimr grid their. restrictions. on . .landscaping sh 1'." ; clearly delineated on.the.plans,. } (4) A final' acoustical .analysis sh"all be provided to address° paGenti.al noise impacts'from the R:T.. S`S f Railroad and? any necessary mitigation,for exterior and interior. noise levels. , The analysis shall be reviewed and .accepted by the. City;Planner �rio;r_.to. 4 t'he.j.Suince of building permits. Engineering Rivision (1) _Tt�e level®per ha11 obtain he necessary right-of way-qnd;construct full width improvements` for Sxi erra, Piadr,,e Avenue.'from the 'project site .northerly to the.. ` eiisting .ded'ica- d portion of" Sierra (�a'dre ,.Venue .� prior to issuance of building permits. Sidewalks shall be constructed along,'-the:west sides and shall. cove.., the entire the'Eblock gall; to the j curb. The developer it eligible 'for reimbursement. } for the , cost` of" corystructi:on .et+f the off-site. improvements.. upon •de;velopment•'or. redevelopment of the adjacent property The �" amount ofr,, the reimburs.ement hilt be ;prorat'ed 'on a ,net acreage . basis .(minus• str�eet:Aec'ication) for .the�benefzted�. propert°i es: PLANNING COMMISSION' RESOLUr(IOPa 40: OEVELOpMENT REVIEW $$ 03 ALAN June 22, 1988`� Pans 4. T C (2) Storm drain .facilities shall be constructrJ and an easement provided to convey flows':; rbm S!er;ra t,adre Avenue through the site to the satisfactiaii of,'the �• r, Caty Engineer.. (3) A 11 foot easement for the future master planted storm drain shalt -. 'be . dedicated along the south, property line of.the site to .*the satisfaction of the City Engineer: (4) The storm, drain easements shall ,be accessible by_. City ,vehicles. Landscaping within. the easements ` shall be subject to the; approval . of the City Engineer. (5) An easement over the internal drive aisles shall be, -provided to the City to ensure macee 's for City . maintenance- vehicles to the Gity .cstorm, drain easements. , (b) " An in-lieu „fee a,, ,ont�ibutson to the future undergroundrng of to e04ting, oVerhead 'utitities (railroad communication -lints), wi�h'In 'the A S.F. .RaiIroad easement. shall •be. ,pai.d t4 the City prior- to the issuance of building permits, The fee `- shall be half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the, proieci site. (7) Plain Street abutting'the east pro�,rerty line .shall be completed pith a modified turnJ,around (I8 :'foot radius) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: b. ' The Deputy Secretary to this Commissions shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND'ADOOTED TAIS.22ND'OAY OF JUNE, Igaa. r PLANNING is TSSION OF TH'? CITY OF R,'iPiCFl6 CUCJ8+90tA BY: y arry , tom n Y ATTEST; ra epu y, pre try t Y 1t . PLANNTNG Cf�MMI5SI0N�?FtESOLUI'I0N �i0. �: " ' '• i} ` DEVELOPMENT REVZEW,89-03 ,ALAN.,SM[Tp .' June 22, 1986 Page, 5 I, Brad Buller', Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission, of;the City,,6f Rancho Ct7C3pfonga,.do.hereby certify that the. foregZing:,Resa'utfion was duly'and regularly introduced - Gassed, and:;adapted by''the `?lann ng Commission ar the City of'Rancho Cucamonga,,a -.a,-regul,a meeting of thR Planning°Commission- held on the '22nd.day of June, 1988, by tple-failowing. vote-towit: AYES; COMMISSIONERS,: JOLSTOY, EMERICK, 8LAKESLt1',,CHITIEAj MCNIE NOES: COf�MISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT:'. ;COmM,I 3iDNERS: 01 NONE s 1f f i 'r Yk V 5 5 ✓ZY.� .,�yt CC 33 'v..VO�C O.y99� OC�pi O< OV�6.0 ydro o�:��w • ��.•..`a C•M Y O1 L) 6 ay.Y m 4 y .� a�r�Y S Q y���9 W YYgp4y44 LV'N Qr .JN V L` O 'r p' 09 Y N� OCC� Rr 7M vw 0,13 a SV'" 4Y9N d - ov.•Y C_ra «tl Y�' €w 4p0 $',$M"O'L Yw'B =C'C�n Q O Y.:iY�a1��Cwy�t� �VQ40 YaY. oVc pi p��CO '�O qy Y:i�N� •r�y�V+L�w• u®5:...Y QL�'ed QN �V4V yoyu� I, ep�� 12 LLY.� .qq Oa QI•w vN Ol O wq^d A �.c@ I. �J Y�Y �g V ,a s6 � "C p2:9 pQ M- O��.M S�j�P.�V�•[rC �p1 _ v�r 01v ` Y.M �'QY�^ OpY. °•4.UM •OW Vey TL Y E C�C D V�J$�} C N Y Y� N we Q. N N y L Yy C.y c �m Y•Y jO.M Y C L yD�/��VVp{�r`{/• _ w ym.�6 L•t .Y O SU �M p S� ::6 tl..6® _M M�V.Y p� .i�.'Y•QO:\N:b•�I4,� �Li,.A:N aY.Y. v:Nv..� �S .�C�.Yt�..��I E U"! .! G 1aYa,, 'gyp y �pAd P '9��'�('dl�'w oppg.y. _ �OV ® $u a N As *.a V pp1@ eeYJJ�H �Vim. U{L ffi •.O C dp. N Ot.tl{N Yf sp Y •a gC Ail" yy 4Y��O O.G CL d®® 4 G y C O O W Oyy qq®V Q N�L��w O M 4 1. :d Y N Idyy by J � ■Q- � p9p a�p OR. y �Y�3 dC.O tl4C a.l �} app 'go m g MM �g gR � �yggj Y 4 1"�•' s�HoN M� B � \ a Z^. vw Y YYO. s G O L pO - � QutlO V`Y� oS o,+_ o Ygo �O.yC�.3�NC LN^ Y y.:Yd s.M 4.ga LLo�y�r.gg[[.'�a� ` iu = Nx^ :yyc.1y.@ 'LY�aYC.» `C, U.1 C:!'zs. :'®r :�iYL®�.g0� a 3�NCch_Y @y ..� MC�.■bT OC�YLYr�. r�b = c4 � M�' QIL .9 C uu�ay�`y'"-� re°Y,�_YQQ�C.N.`�� �pH �y_ @0.4.N `g CY cyY vY,5.0 i' S. Y� �YY :O91.Y qr1 y .6 GH p� oo='�'� ^e°�> .v� era tl O,000S a Yip . c Ne AT -t-',- -dM Ve®m4b3,• yyy`e� �gvrV oc� oG�� �;`' d�� gL�3A C G.1 Y.74 yea °s�C ty9 •SLF �p i OC >^co z. '^Q Vw Y= �9 C� `mow vha q r g 4 m $�31 w$p �Vja �Yr r �Ly S..!aj C's 91>Z. 0@4 L tl p� Y _ �gL �g.. *- �qqa a 4 Y 4 L Oy..Y 0` C G ccaa YcC.S o:�'Cb p'i �s`�q.: �� _.La <0�6i �NyYr YI.YMN\,a i�YLl4�lr�. uu } Lp - y.Y. yap f+ Leo a..4 -35 8,ptl N.. @ K �. C !D C YyC M Y C W N 4 Z. IL dM�..r @q G. tlY>.. lytl.@tllu A �q® u`�■p^ Yii@! N�;�9 Lft 5 0- LeW N +Gy .i.iC�41:.�. 4A�El pC�Y • C a�i Y r tl 44aa >_� YL ~Y O g tl � �y9 CN®e L 6OsVy � •w .wGG�1V f<J O' VN' Yy� Va °'ca d3r $p� Mau �p�E►' 'yyam W�03�y ,�:c$�e° a�9 0 CCSI^ _ LOr Y�O irr @w ,Y Q�9 LYLT.w CrgG6O Y� LgM s�s rYw.6 �� Y`Y .�-�tl±_{��a��� i9�N'� U 1 5 u`a� '® .� ^ 8 O:a a O sNM {{�� yy r,tOCr yu y,Y DO:. tltl .. Nr yy X � p®ticNcN � n 8l0 ~ CyVj bus 1 C C.Y r0. NYw. y�� oa,�. W'«4� a�s"~tl`y�e @a @ as aL E@ Naas `a 5 .E�A�& 3 yyYV��ppb-�$44,v. Y o@py $yYVaa!pp�®`.. 'gcpea �.. +&Q� QO�WO S�^' C��p LYV`C V� ....a�C VppV,9L 6B ®qq ° M Luy` V Y r Y ..i.r 1'N`4� L V'�a Nw V` b. o. V rL {yG' y p®gB� yy p <tl C.G ... t'�°i+M G, N®V y �p}Q�0 C® cVY4a Y.y' •*a CL'Z r .a'VtiC.L ?. GC Cp CCC=pp OOOOC.r.n..v..{{•��.• —1 GYM. C Lvy E V yNV�� V V C O$r8L LYC L TO L 9Yari C t�•¢V O� ` „ ....�x d6 ..Y_d^r CW a~p�� E:GM L G.pir Nya �cN y V6y�! q9 S..Tr7a,.roVV>i.YG C o 0 6 C•�y�0 ps".V ' M4y.•V �N G.~ A ON G �-Y09O1 NNY ;Lb � • 58 O 'g $fit•.+y "b 1 Ep p "p� .341 a 't z� rto Y �> pc Y GV •uq•N L.O yy CC V 5 �4� M>Of iu •• ,'1YM �; pC.YMv`3' Nq Oyq-.qN C �YMr Ny Lj VY sue. try )'QQG EON..0 VY aa`Qc ppN rN o —aw, L�YQ1 to 4Y,p 0 M Y« �L •��� L ..N,.`a V,>y". a.— A~y MVP NO N r+ �fe ao ..CB a s�"s �" 3epYS" ¢ y¢ y v� OIL e 1 b 0 N pO L M N N N�Qp O V�G.'¢'q � V e✓ya Odrp OrD e 4L� w�C � ,:ON� �'-x�'C•+ �p��Y d L O • 1. y O n., N..O C c/ SSE 3_!! p upon y jj yg O N•4�. "'OI p � "^o •w=1r 1 "�y'r' �Y'• �G1•Ng Y1r6•a.VLr.�A �' :� •Y pVM"t�'I y�..N M JC`yO�6M1 Owl.: dypy y i q N�C� n�iyG4f" .+. Y iyyyiVCYYY®T®M 4 YO �mO.y +` a'43N ^NNW.O�GG 'g�V' 4N4•Y ¢.MY S.. NY� NO�.p 61yv Y'.O� NYs+ .O" N •Y 4�W Lir b 0. 3 its G "�••L ► O�i u ,� vow-aN <-Nr <N 7M`o ►.w�" iiv u�...+o�>��`v,StB <•.Gw v «v :�r$:oN yy yy 2Y C.• 010 i.L-0Q.Yu CyL'y G� ti_r 'f Y •lq." p; Y�a� Kc N ••�^ 'ut:r_aa •,o ,� � KN o �'Z NN v=yYp 4�0{ wr�YF: "O -1 3�IL n"Y y4 a $qMTZ 14g VV'00 6 �4 O .L+ a. NS�¢�•j> ;*.a— p oL !~N.tl qW.•. L!a• V a Vag• 3' Ii Off® r M.a#6ll N 0 3, p A^ Q Q y y y4�y� 4 M Y Y �:V L'•a" sY O r U C y rY GYL VIp v ._ C 3tl " ".� Od6O YC4 �;•• qNY ��`y� ��, �^ �� y L. ���Y M �p Ow^® .gypY O.N •N p4 c(� C ply C4� pO C ��rjd �yd w9+� O^. iiV N y� v` C.`C Y :� 4NL�1 V `Ua` v L Y iRWii vZ. . �Y3 N O� NN.OM w:r '01. y 4r.-TL �Y y4'r ��dO tl� FLU`. CC a V{Lay =C 4 ! tp VyV y�N Oyyj{O Y eftR Y• �S A. � �•pp" N V MCNK® . M�" a L Yam.. V Ol pig` M` q Y i'Oti` � 1/;"yypY YO��•�^p yG � ViZ asp a• se, 6 y .�.. q� ciY.� v'� �ii+se`;g... 4 •Q.. '1i a.= 3.1 0� 2 b N N: 'M G •g� �.L p <t•IL 4.ao- s y lz ,^a WL C'YY CC" oc& .. W�•'•pp V N YY 'G C CyAS. _ i. �V4 r m�yis .$Cw.:C` �.ZY VaZ ra�ad V� tS CyVy �wQyya4 �ppyyyyr Gar • e'.--BBa 4Q1M� -XY� Y �OlV ypa.LLYC :E.yLV " (1N w i L p.IS ilC 4s --O� � I3.. YYu2`a' g Br.Yuc■9 e�'Ov $ vAd■G'�� � �SS .e��;�' o o�•;_ 1i •✓ N � e VY W : -94, .0 „'aW� V x 1 N '� apt. LGSi-:N•. V.!4 " Y..8 O LV � C.L $ 0g 3Q�L � a��N �a u y�w•gL V VIA Y �..a o, O:�V� ,•P 4wf yy V,,.J o NEW a.. y_.1.3tv jb= sdre �+�,�yl ..a `o eSu � sr3fi.n� �•aisy`-� ���jaVl' Sae "u"y..p Lw4i-1 �iH VN qc.OW O"� ��r�J �wY. �L^�Ch 41 CC T i] L �ta o dr;� Lw. ".. .•0. w t yw� va-i� 3. .e `.Z Sy -�_0.6gV �yyY M. Js �w� J t��7Ug J�mSSS'''.63N MV Y.�Ca�Y'V O YSB Nlie S bw "�,"�rp^=8y `•tea 3y �1 I77II GG.L a4�. G <: ■`:�Vv 1�F v� W�OO�l W 1.L3�i iY"C3� W �O�•.O N N -VA _ P 'e•"'•n`a yyy� : g'.�y ^y nzzgz CQ 4�' M �a ytl(♦yV -C: l^Y'Vl 'Ell p '7:L Jyt C qV Q`�.." pV Z• rP. 9 VVVy u p C�9yV O V V.�m UWY� • 'Aa.B N.� 0 QC pN�p r Q Y3Y �. Y®:Oi ` E+ Cl-. p Ali qY L i 4 7 V.5a i p O ^IL cy,cC ' V ~Wq A CD A O Nag$'•. " L ID �q aL� ., �� w �Q r.A o pp P4 py: its i�CC r �, �% MC IL YN i'Z P LN 3 aV JyY @° N VjNj Py6Pr Y6A1iy1v E Npp: 1L,� Nyym'.9e..M 'C.yQV .a�p6y wc V �Y 4oL"'pY p b 6 '_ A V 16 0, 2223 ""— Jok l M ; V .. 4 S Yy7Y wL I o6GIt " IR MV Y:�' p` �tl ,Pa. ®N�.y Cc oi.O :a V e. z� `. a � 9_IIOAe �M~mod a �. IV i�ZI IS�d Vn 54 �• .� pd :.� JAW '_� g =�®= � g is Iat �_ 22;Lo C = r N y:y �Y O. V � �Q4 W6 Q.`rg ®qVCA A �jj��gQg.� yyVyy.L O -�as4tl' y C L1►:W Ya_iaeiQ L N}n�.�V_ -.C..� ,y! �I �P W19� OC a^ Vq CL [+ =: V vV+wP.i G6492 r 4V C^'_ r G,jj N 8 4.L. G r ru {y�pg pg 1 gQ R OYNP Y Y7.4r W#:L 6.V.•:� 4 y. Qgtl «ax a r� L`..e0p f4101 Yy� V b COS A 4 IS_ wif-gI 's M N Gaiyyl z Till V �S4 90y CV `9 Y i .0� n4_ G �y C, rs_ 4N� BMW n„�Cy wL. Y4ANO ' a 4qg13 ..aj . 31 L:g� N�Lv q L.2 L> 0 ��Q+'6 4�rj�i Cam` e Q y � ��� 4 . $` Wa �¢Q� 5 pgySy.� �/d Y O W yV. ` b ` pYM Y U C..Fr4 t aat, me ZM a a e P1 N Y w g a a amli p Y.Oa.V K9.Sytl 614. Ci i yPC �lgVs M4 Z_ fig 8og g: tlalflww ` w �5� ta,—V �s�.. ZA AA Cat I O aV 1! L� ti a Vw er yJpy C�.M YY BYy�A V7. it �M O +ram I �{ H s w Eh iris rV 'wY oR 1A r1W _� 1y �V1 O :M1i 11� 6w0 1yyVM5� f za tly0 pe Y 4 H� w gy.p �ia4w r p 2TLU a. ail QZ.� 6i~Npp �j.,`�C�a11' N.� w�1QQ y #«i rgeQ:V. ,j ` me'"Al y O`. �r^q ti� �4i. p L' .. �I �. a Ott a..j-yV� V.0 VM 041 4 a�a a$ �r ��. �$� 'w '� ", w�C'O N"'�N �n ��' %c tla'4�* py y` S O tl�1 Q Cg µ C 9n ��11 py ogE ,¢i p wV y • 3 C � 4 Y `C� :o M q `O G I N N "= p O O 4'' O L 8 W Ol ?!:: � N Y C • q C wi G,2' Q C 4 �a d^py C q C�YC Y 'O� 'l YyO C OIL R �♦ .0 �q O` ee y 0 us ...p a 1 C Lr'. "e prt� cg3. �"� w: �• 'v a'V� . � .tea g$� .xk i �m� �2 •�6i QI s�r';� moo+ tN Hu VA 'O Nui N,W OGaY L V V b Lam. viiRUN i� U® bO �" 'qq�.. a Yo YYa '0 v3o5$� in e`r' ooY.3 su v� wrai�Qu ' v u 'R aN SeV w VL G40 L� 6Y«OL Y« O1LL.D MV YAg'55 f1 CG(ii, I NW O .OII tl� O 0M w-` YY.NM� tlizl •� y yy O M a«...:, TO a� w 3,L •y N a a• 'b. 4 p tlN O V r� Y Pltl ,,01 C e 0 y y' a m '^ �� oil o a e r n s d" e� Ni p_ mp �I M. ^� yy IL2 Y V 2 d b ® y Q) 0 p G W�.M. W M E Y o a ` -05 GG a b y Y 83 G A�y �N V b B7 a V d !V e A ¢ .p y'Y G®Y Nto y J q 7;�4 :C�yN C.'.4dY '�0 ..`. :. W E]N® ati� •�.`p� `«� i� ` Z, ^r WYY pp LL. 810113 �n - G Wm, m C'C w �.�41 _Y GC V✓ d V� o � a o'o a« ti N vup o �§o o� ova k O L L L NNW Oy° i i N a C ieCS f I: CL st s �'. ° C`VaAs rCtl L 6MY q vv y Q a v �ua� As. _O CY1.Gy A ,. as .�6 ® a3e � �� �, �qN!. �, �°•oa� be'b` P5. O� O Ya 7.y yuy�pp 5 N GGG N p £ O 4`• VAC` tl�Y _� � � ` 0' ��.e gP_rr�.p L` L; q ; p NA yYp fVS � °' H '> tl_W :O - ®1 fi­ 15- A Y N NLOe:C wQ �r ys V� 6Y ayyyW Qr° ` yv l �A.� yy Vv e,M�q �0S®� SN �N ®..i►y � 4a 6 A':M� C��L Vy.G O �` Yt9NC 1r W�G1'yyi 6e� pp�y®, '..d= � �Y9 ar'YC®®® LwrY•� �M'3gE MdO . Ci u Itl tl ,RtALUT:ON,isO' -.A RESOLUTION Or'-THE PLANNING COMAiSSiON,OF THE CITY.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI'FO•RNIA,� APPROV.INS A TSME EXTENSION AND. MODIFYING" :T £ _CON61TIONS"::OF APPROfAL FOR;DESIGN REl'IEW;NO 88-03 THE DEVELOPMENT OF 2.0, APARTENr UNITS: ON I.DS,hCRES _0 LAND -IN ::THE`,MEDIUM ,HIGH ESQENTIAL`- DISTRICT; (14-24 ��WELLING UNITS PER ACRE)—'LOCJ�TEDIYAT THE. END OF°SIERRA PADRE. AVENUE, WEST OF EDWIN; STREET, AND" hfAKING FINDINGS iN" SUPPORT THEREOF-=�APN 207-281-22..: .' _ l A. Recitals " (i) A.E,, Smith:has il.,id an"applicatio6:1+or theiextension'.ef;.Design Review NO. 88-•03`as 'described "in".the title• ofrthis; esoluti,on.,_,HereTna•fter in this Resolution, the subject T=me Extension; request isre.ferred to asi "the. application." (ii) On ,June 22, ..1988, _ this Commission` adopted Its. Resolutior Nc. 88-117, thereby approving; stti63ect to specific conditions and:"time,lamIts, Design Review No. 8843. ' (iii) On August 17, =1098; 'the �C *y 'Council adopted' Resolution No.'88-05, thereby ,approv'ng subject to a'l1 sp�qcif!c 'conditions .and time limits set forth in Planning Coirunhssion `Resolution Na. 88-117s Design Review 88-03. (iv) On June 28, 1990,, the ,applicant fi led a request for a 12,-nonth time extension. (v) On the 8th of August, 1990,-,,the,,.Planning%Ooinmission of the_City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a'duly notic ed.'publ,ic '.hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on tha`y date. (vi) All-legal prerega' sites prior to tea=adoption; of this,Resalution have occurred. . B. 'Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE,; �t is'chereby' found_, determined, and resolved. by.the` Planning Commission of the City of Rancho -Cucamonga as follows: 4` 1. This Commission, hereby 'specifically-:'. s that all `o;� 1he'facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A; of this Resolution are"true and correct 2. Based upon substantial-`evidence presented "-to this Commission, ' including written and oral. staff"reports,,this Commission.';here4y 4pe03fca1iy finds as follows:: I � r• 'PLAN IN( RESi3LUT1,ON. NO., OR'88=03 - A.E.,SMITH AUGUST.8, '1990 Page 2 ,f . a, (a) The; previously aPproved'.Desiga' Revie4 is 'in ' substantial coinpliance,with 'the City current ' Gererat, .Plan, -Specific Plans, Ot?dinances;, Plans, `Cod es, and Policies; and (b). �Tfie extension, of the Design„`Review ti Jll nowt. cause significant.` inconsistencies' with the'. ; current General plan, Specific Plansa Ordinances; Plans,`'Codes,;and Poaicies;,and (c) -the'—extension, Of the Design Rev iew>is -not likely to 'cause f public health and safety problems; and (d)_ The extension is' `within the' time imits prescribed by stateylaw and local ordinance. (e) The previously appruV.ed Design -Review i,s 'not `consistent with .;.Urgency' Ordinance- 'Ho. 395 pertaining to. the evaluation of adequate school facilities for the - proposed• residential development: 3. Based upon the findings avid conclusions set'forth in.pitragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby'.approves the:appiication subject 'to`each and every condition set fort?; belokc and;,"in the-Planning Commission Resolution No 88-117 attached hereto and ,incorporated herein by this reference: (a) All .conditions-•7of 'approval,` as contained in Planning ;,Commission Resolution No. 88-117,` sh?111 apply sxcep& where modified herein. (b) Approval shall :expire on August 17, 1991 if building permits-,.have not been issued,:finless extended by'the Planning;,Commission. rc (c Prior to the issuance of:building permits-, the applicant shall` consent .to, or 'participate in, the establishment-` of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project., site to provide, in •conjunction " with the applicable School District, for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities However,,-cif,any School District has previously; establishedSuch -a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative; consent to the annexation of. the project site Anto. the territory of such existing. District ,prior to the issuance of building permits. _, i M zx 1� _ PLANNING. COMM., SON RESOLtlT,ION N0 DR 8$-0$ - q�� SMITH . AUGUST$; 196` N PageB . /� z� r 1 Further,, if- the affected School` Districts has' not formed ;a Mel Io-Roos..Community, Facilities:, ' ' District .within 1Z months .of. the date "af approval of:the•time,extension'and"prior td^'the recordation ;;a,f the;.Fina1 Map or, i'ssuance.of' 6uild'ing ; permits for .saiu pi-dject this: ca.ndition:`sha11 be.'Neemed 'null and void'. F 4 The Secretary to'this Comm si�on shall certify to the adoptjon: , this Resolution 4 k 1 APPROVED AND°ADOPTED THIS 8TH, DAY OF AUGUST', 1990: PLANNING COMMISSION.QF THE,CITY OF RANCH -CUCAMONGA` BY. Larry T, McNiel Chairman , ATTEST: Brad B,-,ller,-Secretary, I, Brad Buller, Secretary of .the Planning.. Ofl!maisys�a__sf. th .C,i:tu ,nk. tanhg,_' Cucamonga,;; do hereby. certifjr 'that the 'foregoing ;Resolution Was' duly .arid regularly introduced, passed, wand adoPt#&r by the .Planning Commission of t:he City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular, meeting of the Plann i.g 47stio► held ' on the 8th day of `August, 1990,:by thetfollowing vote to-wit { AYES: COMMISSIONERS: �� NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: .ST, • �7 a CITY OF RALNCHO CUCATTAONGA TA R DATE: August, 8, 1990 TO: Chainnan and`Members�'of the Planning Commission FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier; Senior Civil Engineer_��C . SUBJECT: Grade: Separation at Foothill Boulevar&and„Soµthern pizllfic Railroad ;- BACKGROUND: In December of 1987, 'the firm of DeLeuw. Cather, Engineers and Planners " were engaged by Professional Services Agreement tc prepare preliminary alternate design schemes'rfor the subject, project: Five alternative,, ' schemes were discussed 04' are as`follows } Scheme 1: Add. One Steel Span oh`,Northeast - Unsymmetrical Roadway Widening Sche.,e : 2: Construct New. ' 2-Span Stee?' " Girder Underpass - Symmetrical Roadway Widening;: I Scheme 2A: New 2-Span Steel Girders Unsymdtrical RoadWa,r Scheme 3: Construct New Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Underpass 4 Scheme 4: Constructz New prestressed ConcreteJ,TCp gh'-Type Girderr Underpass % fY� -It should be noted that a r9Riacement projec." ,proposing a longer structure was nominated by the �. "_y of Rancha Cucamonga for consideration on the California P4!blic-llYiliyyCo stateoide,�pr ority `" list of grade separation;�r trepiacmneot, but:becaus'e of the relatively;; k high cost, :and low train counts, it did, not receive4 sufficiently high priority position to obtain State matching funds. Foothi"l Boulevard `generally has an ,existing roadway width of 64,feet or - greater,. but at the.existing. underp_ it is reduced to 44 feet due to the short span provided by the railroad structure. Foothill:Soul evard,is deficient i.n that At ,only provides' four nonstandard lopes 'on' a' thoroughfare plarined for six lanes. ITEM J i w71 PLAtiNING "COMMISSIQN. STAFF REPORT " GRADE SEPARATION FOOTNIL`t BLVD 3� •S0. pACIF2C'RA,ILROAQ AUGUST 9, 1990 PAGE 2 • L The width of, the existing underpass imits• the`capacity ; and create congestion as fhe'roadway, width. is .reduced to 49 feet because of the short span provided•by the .railroad structure. The rCity pians,to widen Foothill Boy'evjird;to, a 120 fOot right-of-way,:six-lane faci3ity •(94 foot. curb-to-curb; wiab A-14 foot median) With& the City 19mits;. The City'has " hired a private consultant who is in t� oval through C e process'of 'prepiring -a Pr'Ject Study Report/ProJect, •Report for appral trans .for the ` widening of Foothill-Boulevard from Grove Avenue to C,ion Street.. 'ic ;• ,. Since the report was. �ca�pleteri� by DeLeuw 'Cather several street improvements have ticep installed, plrLicularly in the, southeast.quadrint which would seem to rule: out the 'possib ]'I of unsym'etrical widening of Foothill Boulevard, that is existing 'roadttay to remain ;for eastbound.° traffic; new roadway to be constructed parallel and on the nor h for westbound traffic. ANALYSIS: . Based on the 'report by DeLeuw Cather, rec`entlycompljetert improvementsEfor, the southeast quadrant~,of Foothill Boulevard and less impact _►�titi� "th! Sycanore Tnn,. the alternatives were, narrowed to Scherer 2 °and 4:: Steel Versus Concrete Structurewith symmetrical wMening, of Foothi�f1 Boulevard. The estimate cost for ,these � tructre3;' including the associated street work is as follows: , 1. Scheme 2 - '$4,000,,OQ 0 2. Scheme 4 $5,2001000 The Steel sitructure: It lCiss•costly, has a shorter construction schedule, and is mordF acceptable to the `railroad than.the Rrgs'wessed Concrete { Trough Section. In addition', due,to. the extreme skew-of�tt e railroad (61,_ , degrees to9i`Foothill), the- steel structure is.' ire adaptable to' landscaping since the abutments can"be constructed parallel to the ,. roadway and with proper facia ireatme 'more,pleasing,irt,appeaiance than a concrete struc"turn. The',,abutments of a concrete structure wool d be perpendicular to the- .railroad• track, which ;would be a . skew tb the roadway, leaving a big 'gap between the;edge of the road `,ani one,Pnd F" the abutment.; This gap.or' hole aduld be;.difficult.to landac pe. RECOWENDATION: Staff,is. seeking concurrence framthe Connrission on Scheme 2 (symmetrical widening and construction of a n6w 2=Span Steel Girder Underpass), before � x 1r seeking City_CounC-A s approval to begin with fi'na1 plan preparation.. I �.w X. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GRADE SEPARATION - FOOTHILL BLVD., 8 So. PACIFIC thILROAD AUGUST"8, 1990 PAGE t, The Department of Transportatjon (Cal trans) has recently-'cc mated � ' Project Study Report for the Underpass and is in, the process;of, prepiiA6g the Project: Report. .lr They also: recommend Scheme 2 as the design concept.' It,should be noted that the concrete str4nture (Scheme 4} would , require temporary falsework over, the, existing travel Aanes,:which `would ;zoo impair vertical clearance over the ''roadway and create hazards to vehicular traffic`�due tow. the Qmporary, -Limber filsework bents aqd,'�:. supports. . This being •a state' highway, Cal trans will'objectl to any construction that:will cause:verticat-jMpairment.to thet;r highway, riot to l mention the possible re-routing or deinuri,ng of vehicular traffic. (trucks) that exceed the vertical.clearanWa`created by 11 e construction.. Respect f tted f SS 1 . Maguire Ci RM:MO:sd Ci u• V 5 i n o.in goa 73 Li lit x it.AW, d I -- p i 9 ° i4� fi .it ale ItI k1