No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/01/09 - Agenda Packet ................. ._�� �7 0 EI A A1�I A0 199 �A { # � �:i a �� � � ,, �` ;j � x� ,� i �`'.3� �_ y `� �,� � ;� `�' E d.:.{{ y;;S 1;� +. t�'�. a.� '� E t ¢ "f k'1; ,,� - 7 7 '.� - - is ,:_ FS�. U -.� i;� vr;{- i '� j (� .:] _ ��. jj. k `,. i '' tk 5 tE F } k � 4 { ,� l 1�® __ c�CAMq� ZG�o c9n CrrY O Y kANCfio C[ICAA NUN o - o INNING COMMISSION V V sAGENlY • .. r 1977 WEDNESDAY JANUARY 9,;1991 f; 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMiONGA CIVIC_CEN rER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 0RANCHO CUCAMORGA :CALIFORNIA I. i4edge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Chitiea Coimni'ssioner Tolstoy Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette Commissioner Melcher III. Announcements <y IV. Approval of Minutes November 28, 1990 November 28, 199C, Joint Workshop with Chino Ba..in Municipal Water District V. Consent Calendar The. following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. BVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-31 •- a development of a two-s ory o ice U11 i!ng tota—R g 16,000 square feet on .9 acres of nand in the Industrial Park Area (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and. Civic Center Drive APN: 208-352-06. Staff recommnas issuance of a Negative Declaration. VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which 'concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related' project.: Please wait to be recognized,'-')y the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such 'opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. B MODIFICATION. TO TENTATIVE TRAC;i 14055 - ''MODERN request to division i y a ono= of su ivision. for core —55i ni um purposes to a threE!-1 of subdivision of 115 units on 10.27 acres of land ire: the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units 'pzr acre), located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue - APN: 207=201-32 and 12. (CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 13, 1991.) C. TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACI 13945 l e request or ex enston of a previously approved Vesting Tentative Tract 'Map consisting of 35 ' single family lots on 15 acres,of land in the Lmv Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per'',ire) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the so, side of Highland Avenue, east of East D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Avenue AND APENTATIVE�071 AC•ASS 14875 T TRA T � resi en is su ivis�on ana design review o condomiainm units on 3.56 acres of land in the Office Professional District, a proposed Medici Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acres), located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street APN: 1077-332-26. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Decla-ation. Associated with this project is General Plan Amendment 90-01B,and Development District Amendment 90-02. E. `CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-39 - GHASSAN WANIS - The request to establish a convenience market and deli within' the existing Archibald Auto Center in a leased space of 1,997 square feet on 3.22 acres of land in the General industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 8880 Archibald Avenue - APN: 209-032-42 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - request o amen the Circulation Plan o t e General Plan to delete collector status of Banyan Street. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration: VII. New Business Ah G. ENVIROHMENTAL ASSESS'JENT AN6 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-2B - M�,BUILDING SYS` iS; T.E a expansion o an ex'tits manu uri ac ng ac Ttty totaling 36,000;:square. i, feet on 4.4 acres of l and';,in the General Irdustr%l f District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial S^ecific Plan, located at 9810 6th 'Street APN`: 209-2i1-19. Staff' reca-ine►rds issuance; of a -Negative Declaration. AssociAted Tree Removal Parrr:it No. 90-22. VIll. Director's Reports H. USE DETERMINATION 90-05 - L,D, KING - A request to eterm7n.e a p apo-sue, use of capper recycling to be manufacturing at opposL4 to a scrap operation. I. CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE AN INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO I ;. D STANDARDS FOR INDOnR SWAP MEETS J. STREET "SIGNI:(Oral Report) IX. Commission Busis:ess I K. DECEMBER 6, 1990,-PLANNING C"IS,SION WORKSh P9 NOTES - Review Mnti-'concurrence with lklemoranumr4; Qu"�-M-nTing commission action -it Central Park''L..,i,brary Wor`tshop X. Public Comments This is the-time-and place for thin generaO public to address' the Commission. Items to be discassed here are those which do not already appear on this egenda. XI. Adjournment The planning Cexr.,Assion has adopted Administrative Regulaltions, that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they small ,be heard only with the consent: of the Commission. i r I i i i MAP Vlff I I NO I T ly" i - CROW .Y 7a�w COf.tiOi R uft v .� ® ate® I � ° to•rwse.GVapI.CcIr a Gigs •ei° Gareerp:sxrto°evGsu as mr Cffy Of RAMCM CUCAMOMA y CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.ML ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 9, 1991 TO: Chairman and Memberp of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-31 - e development of a two-story o ice building to�ta Ting 16,000 square feet on .9 acres of land in the Industrial Park Area (Subarea 7) of the industrial Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of !!tics Avenue and Civic Center Drive -`A?N: 208-352-06. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action Requester;: lssuanco� of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Office Buildilgs; Industrial Para (Subarea 7) I South Office Buildipgs; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) I East Office Buildings; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) West - Office Buildings,; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East Industrial Park West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant and void of aiy signs -ican vegetation. Off-site improvements (curb, gutter, and streetscape including street trees, sidewalk and driveway) have been completed for the site. The site slopes gradually from north to south. E. Parking Calculations- Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office 16,006 1i250 64 64 ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89-31 - J & L ASSOCIATES January 9, 1991 Page 2 II. BACKGROUND. IAis project was originally part of a 9.1 acre master plan user DR 84-43 for three office buildings on the west side of Utica. Avenues between Aspen Street and Civic Center Drive (see Exhibit "I"). The Environmental Assessment was completed and a Negative Declaration issued for all three buildings. However, plans for only two buildings on the parcels to the north of the subject property were approved under the Development Review with the requirement that a separate review be required for any future proposal for the third parcel at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and Civic Center Drive. Subsequently, plans were submitted for review as required. Staff feels that a new Environmental Review should'he done for the third parcel since approximately six years has lapsed since the last review. III. ANALYSIS• A. General The proposed use is in conformance with the goals awn development standards of the Industrial Are.a Specific Plan and is consistent with surrounding uses. The project has been reviewed by the Technical and Design Review Committees After environmental clearance, final approval of the project will come through the City Planner with the appropriate conditions and special conditions. B. __Pa__r__k��in__g��• A reciprocal/shared parking agreement was approved wi�tTie original master plan approval, OR 84-43. Parking for the two existing buildings north of the subject site, meets the parking requirement for office use of 1/250 and is i'n conformance with the parking lot plan of the approved master plan. In a similar manner, parking for the new proposed building meets the office use parking requirement and is also in conformance with the parkin;, plan of the approved master plan. C. �Drainage. A review of the grading plans for the subject site indicated that control of stormwater runoff from the City's property to the west onto the site was necessary. Stormwater runoff will be controlled by a drainage device installed on the City's property adjacent to the west property line of the subject site (Exhibit "B"). Construction of the drainage device will require the granting of a temporary easement onto City property. Procurement of the temporary easement and construction of the drainage device will be included in the Conditions of Approval. A. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 99-31 -'J b L ASSOCIATES January 9, 1991 Page 3 D. Design Review 'Committee: The Design Review Committee TChitiea,To stoy, an ong) ,reviewed the plans for the proposed project on May 3, 1990. Revised plans were reviewed by the. Committee (Tolstoy, Weinberger, and Krouti:) on September 6, 1990, addressing the following concerns 1. Grout for the brick veneer is to match the color of the cement plaster band at the parapet. 2. The cement plaster band at the parapet should be a precise texture or smooth finish plaster. 3. The tower should incorporate a cap of at least a different pattern of brick providing a stronger terminus to the top of the tower. The Committee recc,mended using a brick veneer in a soldier course pattern for the cap. 4. The round railing on the building and at the walks should be substituted with a flat railing painted with a warmer . color such as beige. 5. The facade at the southeast corner of"the building needs AMk additional enrichment to emphasize that portion of the building. The Committee felt that the revised plans addressed the remaining concerns from the May 3,_1990 meeting adequately. Additlonally, they recommended that a brick veneer equal to the "Cdicott dark ironspot blend" with a smooth texture as presented be used on the building and that the final plans be conditioned to include certain directions as to the criteria/craftsmanship for the brick veneer application and submittal of a sample wall section of t' ', the to be reviewed and approved by staff. The "approvers Veneer application sample is to be used at'the construction Site as an example for the masonry subcontractor. Final review of the project and recommendation for approval by the Design Review Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy, and Kroutil) occurred on September 20, 1990. The Committee recommended the approval of the project subject to the following: 1. That the width and thickness of the metal plate for the railing be increased to 4 inches by 1/2 inch. 2. That the 'brick veneer incorporate corner pieces and be compatible with the Forecast building to the east and different than the color of the City Hall _ building brick veneer to the west. A- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 89-31 J & L ASSOCIATES January 9, 1991 Page 4 3. That the sconce lights be ,;constructed with ,a granite covering and the tower window sills should be brick veneer in a horizontal soldier course pattern, providing_a 6-Inch reveal. 4.,. The cap :;f',`the toner should be a brick veneer in a vertical scc►ier course pattern. E. Technical,-,Review Co►,xnittees The Committee reviewed the project on a—�Ff y 3,!. ~and determined that, with the Conditions of Approval,,,the development will be in conformance with all applicable codes and standards and the Industrial Specific Plan. F. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study ave been comp e e an no significant adverse impacts have been identified as a resu",,'t of this project.: , IV, FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project use is consistent with' e general an and Ifidustrial,'Area Specific Plan. ;he building design and site plan, toge'her with 'recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The project will not be detrimental t., the public health, safety, or welfare or mat�lrially injurious to surrounding properties. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Ct=nission issue a to-ve Declaration for Development Review 89-31. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BAIjfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Hap Exhibit "B" Grading Plans Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Site Sections Exhibit "E" - Plaza Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "N" - Site details Exhibit"I" - Old Master Plan � �t .m,'�;.�..� wseaervo 'v�wowv�+uo�Nati ssirpneor�er + 'AFd1011fifl fl�1�dO tC'-ba � 9®� wwwZaw.ewrrw�m:Cv`wE'ss.w:r amity 0➢ Y 1'aea 1N>Rll3tiM'1'9'v ,.... 11`Jtdf1/H3.11`dHO 3fl[i,',3 1 t � _ r Burst P L Z - s raps .rr° ONICIlin83owc , tE-8e21a I :'_ arnnmsawwenut '1`3Y � • 1ioun i miN35,. Ull� d � i 1 D _ IFit it ,�J � .�..',ate:• '' '* .6 1P fw � •� i 3 • "LIB �' p� ^ 't x: ."t (( CD '� IA ia i r 1 .1 Z l E. Ian • 'lr.Ol ilYTYtiMY N7• • ''a�Y s. .., • „ ' �taito�worav �•` / y a r _ ' �,• p`a a 47 `� \F4 lz y •� 16 •' Goa - r ,c a aazvno�sva.a•� � JNIt11111a�Jii-10 �te-eeeo ��, � axiw 1- 7_ _ � � t till t r kq t t v.. ° we.�a:m�.w,'Gw-..wT.�' awo�aws' tvwowe�n9wt�c+ei ao.vne!lv,Qr��• �3N{Ol{(183�{d�© 4C-6>3Ma : �{{ uarwnrs�++lnau.�ee�crr�ns'.'e� Y'J0.l.(11 ki3ltd�y'9"JfAIO '�"� "�'°'n" i 1 ! a 1'OW 1°f3gwtlLrr'e•ar � -91k ,. Cz] b NL Xv ui { ! �.3 dill M 4 S'9 8. i J s r � �� Ir :i t c { to l� •1 IN Nk T il- ( �,1 1�4i }l,1 1 v 14 ti e k � z f�. ,.� rt; 11 47� t �� '! x ' i y, e .j_ Er� ' '.�''� �.. 4 .... � � � ,..,�� ti i �;'�,? Niw t .,.. ,, ,:- � yx..x s r i n` ; +...1` kr-:�.+ �, �- .. �� �k �i'. r G . � y" FN.: .. �' + �� � #� e � ` ,r- � 1 [� �.�� ��_ .h ,, i' .^ t ���' s. ,L ,l. _•r®c' ar°ri+'a�ua'�n�'�^ tllie![?J�'11t� YDNo1aV0lYa ONONYe! .---..,-� � s�v+aory sr= ++ LJY1i[3"3ffi1�3Ji3�0 Ae-682ia ' -•11 m...n o If� � �, � CL a r y e�twrxar'ma` + OWny+ 6E-5ElItl r p aew.atsasi+siwv+ ro sew 1/tjC�3�t��t) ��:fl/d Pi •m9fAfiltlYMM7�Y aaiw �� 3.L.N3J ntht:3 v� ••••n• �f:t � r".: t- Alth r� r� R / � w •w` s� ' Sta � f �ip�` 22 1 l ! Lill ir-.fit •'t' p l j'"�li'''I l w l�i. , tr/ H;ol % Z MA 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAA10NGP STAFF REPORT i 3� DATE: January 2, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Corsnission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO TENTATVE TRACT 14055 - MODERN CORPORATION - A request to. mo i y ,a 'one-lot suBdivision for con ominium purposes to a three-lot, subdivision of 115 units on 10.27 acres of land in the tedium Resident4i District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located north of Arrow Highway and ! east of Baker_Avenue - APN: 207-201-32 and 2, Please n to tithe above project i i11 be continued, at the request of th appl can to the February 13, 1991 Planning Commission meeting, Respec �y sutited, Brad uller Ci Planner B:BNap Exhibit "A" _ Letter from Applicant r ITEM LEE Planning ® Engineering o Deseg t December 12, 1990 City of Rar,`�ho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 Attn: Beverly Nissen _ I Re: Modification to TT#14055. Modem Corporation -' Dear Beverly: This is a request to delay the Planning Commission hearing on the abbe described application until February 13, 1991. 991 This request supercedes the ` Previous request by the project engineer, Loren Phillips and Associates, to delay the hearing until January 9. 1991. Late de,`eloping events necessitate the scheduling change.Thank-you for your aeration. ti yt Sirrnrely. Er rest J. Perea 10535 Foothill Blvd.. Suite490. Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 s 1714)944.4';;R ® FA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 9,; 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY Tom Gratin,; Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION AND MOrliFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR VESTING TENTpTIVE`i;RACT 139,5 CITATION The request for ,extension of a prf_lviously aF�proved Vesting Tentative Tract Map consizO na rf 35 inry":e'family lots on 15 acres of Aland in the Low Ke5i rvtial; District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of tom, Etiwanda ,Specific Plan, located on the south side of ttllgh?,and Ayanue, east of East Avenue - APN: M7-071-13. I. BACKGROUND: Vesting Tent cive Tract 1394,5 1das, Griginall;; approved by the ffnnning Commission on December 14 1988, to expire Ln December 14, 1990. Pr(gisions of the Development Code allow for Tentative Tract time extiensions in twelve-month increments, not i,o exceed five years frost the original date of approval. Th'e applicant is currently requesting a one year time extension to expire on December 14, 1991. Additional time extensions maybe requested extending the Vesting Tentative Tract Map until December 14, 1993. 1I. ANALYSIS: Staff reviewed the proposed time extension and compared the proposal with development criteria outlined in the Etiwanda l Specific Plan. Based upon this review, staff determined that the !! project meets basic development standards of the Low P,esidential District. Staff noted that the Standard Condition requiring submittal of a school "Will Serve" letter prior to either issuance of 'building permits or recordatii:n of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map was not a condition of apprr,val. At the time, the applicant provided documentation pertaining to an agreement between Citation Homes and the District for issuance of a certification of compliance for the provision of school facilities. Therefore, the map was found to be inconsistent with Urgency Ordinance No. 395 pertaining to the evaluation of adequate school facilities for proposed residential developments. The Chaffey Joint Union High School District was contacted as a result of the time extension request regard- -g school impaction. The District indicated they are impacteo and requested the applicant be conditioned to enter into ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13945 CITATION January 9, 1991 Page 2 a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the provisizn of school facilities. The applicant has consented to the imposition of the following condition of approval to ensure that adequate school facilities will be available for the proposed subdivision. "Prior to the recordation of the final `;map or the issuance.;of building permits, whichever comes,`first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate. in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community. t"jcilities District pertaining to the ,project site to provide, in conjunction with the. Chaffey Joint Union School District for the construction and maintenrnce of necessary school facilities. However,,-if tK, "District has previously established` such a Community �a tl'ities District, the applicant shall, in the al„e�native, consent to the annexation of the project sit�''�into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final man or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the Chaffey Union Joint High School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within 12 months of the date of approval of the time extension and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void". I11. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a Public Nearing and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. i M. MMENDNTION: Staff recommends the Planning Covnission approve a one yea tim. extension for Vesting Tentative Tract 13945 through adoption of he shed Resolution. espectf sibmitte Brad Su er city P anner BB:TG:js PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF WORT TT 13945 - CITATION January 9, 1991 Page 3 Attachments. Exhibit,-"A" - Letter from applicant dated October 10, 1990 Exhibit "'$"- Letter from applicant dated November 12,1990 Exhibit "C'" - Location Map EOibit I'D" Site Plan Exhibit "E" Resolution No. 88-238 Exhibit "F" - Resolution No. 88-239 Exhibit '"G" - Resolution No. 90-55 Tentative Tract Time Extension Resolution of Approval Design Review Time Extension Resolution of Approval 17731 IRVINE BLVD.,$01tr NO.201,T,IoTIN,CA:92050(714)731•0141 9 Mm UR October 10, 1990 OCT=� p � P11 ^�1 to� �. �1t859c10� t=t—ate �t tDID City of Rancho- �camntigz Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Vested T.M. 13945 Dear Planning Department: We hereby request a one year extension of our vested T.M. 13945,which expires December 14, 1990. We have made progress on this tract, I.e., it has been graded and final map and improvement plans are near approval and signature, but-due to the extrwely poor market conditions for upscale housing,which this-tract and its design review criteria provides, we would be foolish and face further financial hardship should we be required To obtain building permits to "save" this tentative map. We request the Planning Commission give favorable consideration to our request for a one year extension. Very truly ;yours F. G. L* cn, .Jr. ' Development Manager ) FGL/sm 17731.IRVMR BLVD.,SU6n NO,201,T'US11N,.CA 02650 1714j 731-0141 �► •REGU ilr DC PLANNING 10801 I Am t F November 12, 1990 i I fir. Tom Graham Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive '! Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: T.M. 13935 Time Extension -Dear Tom: li We have no objection to the inclusion of Ordinance No. 395 as`a condition to extension of our tentative map. However, this inclusion should only apply to the Chaffey High School District as our settlement with the Etj{anda School Alak District provides under Article i, Paragraph 1.3, that they will provide the city with compliance letters indicating we have adequately addressed.schoel facilities. Please let me know if this letter is:sufficient for your department to recommend approval of the extension, Sincerely, P. G. Unto , Jr. Development anager Southern Gi ision EGL/sm r ---_ --_ -- -� - „ i '' , f %� � tPFt't'J�th"� CITY OF I CHC ,,, UCANiONGA rrEMIsd 1Mrn PLANNiN6 E3MSION /� XHIBrr: SCALE: .a' ham; m 4 r. , :.: 5 !t 1 4 ai 4 n ; F� ice. RESOLUTION NO. 8B-238 A RESOLUTION 6F THE PLANNING 'COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13945, AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-64, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN REVIEW OF 35 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15 ACRES OF LAND IN' THE LOW DENSITY RESIDEr1TIAL 'DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APH: 207-071-018 A, kec-3tals. (i) Citation Builders has f^:led an application for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 13945 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Trace Map request is referred to as "the application (ii) On the 14th day of Dec;.inber, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a-duly noticed public hearing on the a,dr,,ication and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. look B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongr as fellows; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial , d deuce presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heb, Ing on December 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports; togL 'per with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fe 'ows: (a) The application applies to property located on the south side of Highland, east of East Avenue with a street frontage of 990 feet along Highland_Avenue and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the suDject site is Highland Avenue, the property to the south of that site consists of proposed Low Density Residential development, the property to the east is a proposed low Density Residential development, and the property to the west is a proposed Low Density Residential development. (c) The property contains 110 Ejcal; tus globulus trees which have been determined unsuitable for preservation by an arborist report. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLLA ION NO. 88-238 VTT 13945 - Citation Bui",'*rs December 14, 19-38 Page 2 3. Based upon the surstantial evidence presented to this Commission !ing the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The deelgn or finprovemerts of the tentative tract is cansistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) fie site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed•, and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoids-ble_ injury to humans, and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause Ask serious public hearth problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will rat conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, nov, of I record, for a,. 2ss through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Qual7ty Act of 197Ci ind, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth ii; paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Vesting Tentative Tract 13945 1. Wo building permit shall be issued for the construction of any boil ding or structure within the boundaries of the subdivision until the City of Rancho Cucamnga shall have received a letter from the Chief of the Foothill Fire Protection District that a community facilities district has been formed pura_.�- to the provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities fiistrict Act --- of 1982," as amended, to provide for the issuance of bonds to finance the construction and equipping of a fire station to �-9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-233 VTT 13945 —Citation Builders December 14, 1988 Page 3 serve the properties within the subdivision and the levy of special taxes to secure the payment of debt service on such bonds ans to pay for additional fire protection and suppression services, necessary to serve the properties within the subdivision. 2. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of'' the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side .of Highland Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times 'the length of the project frontage adjacent to Highland Avenue. 3. Storm drain fees shall be paid prior to recordation of the` "'Final Map per City Ordinance 286. 4. The developer shall participate in the required improvements to Victoria Basin as required by the San Bernardino Cnunty F1aod Control District and the City Engineer. 5. The developer shall provide i;torm drain facilities and protection measures as determined by the final° drainage study to protect the We from flows from the north. 6. Construct Highland Avenue full width from East Avenue to the east boundary of Tentative Tract 13063 to the east. The developer may request reimbursement agreements to recover the costs of constructing the imprrrwnents and acquisition of the necessary right-of-way fronting Tentative Tract 13063 and fronting the property which ' extends from the west project boundary to East Avenue at the time of their development. ,i IN, developer shall construct full intersection improvements, including traffic signals at the intersection of Highland and East Avxnues to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall, receive credit and a reimbursement for the improvements and necessary right-of-way acquisition from the Systems Development Fee if approved by the City Council. If not b e City .ouncil .this condition sh all be waived. approved the . PP Y y 8. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interest necessary to construct the rciq<Bired off-site improvements. if the developer should gait to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prilor to submittal of the 'final map for approval, enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section '66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall jprovide for payment by developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in ��StJ PLANNING CA4ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 85-238 VTT 13946 - Citation Builders December 14, 1988 Page 4 AOL qW be in the form of a cash deposit. That portion of the security reflecting the value of the required off-site property interest shall be the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commercament of the appraisal. 9. The developer shall construct off-site street and storm drain improvements to the satisfaction ;of the City Engineer. Street improvements shall be full, `'width except for parkway improvements. Both- street and`-storm r:drain improvements shall conform to the requirements for Tentative Tract 13063. 10. The developer shall construct a temporary emergency vehicle access to Highland Avenue. 11. The project shall contribute to the further construction of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine regional drainage/flood control facilities by forming or annexing to a benefit assessment or a community facilities district or by the payment of regional drainage fees as established by the City Council, Formation. or annexation or fee payment shall bo prior to Final Map approval. Oak 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988. PLANNI4CIISSI" OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I BY ? L a a man y ATTEST: r u r, .c etary Y, Bad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commissich of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, posed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES COMMISSIO-YERS: BLAKESLEY, MC NIEL, TOLSTOd j NOES: COMMISSWNCRS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSION€RS: CHITIEA, EMERICK E I.L O. M L R` O■u■ .w O V .L Q �L Yy 4 C o 4 W��® N Y✓ ��`CO a tlY�Y�y YwY.ON C YO Lq... >y Y'V C� RwJO[.Oj g96 O `O yyY'O Q 9 O C O. O N.! N M�j�✓O O 6 L L TT� ^M✓�G 6tl NCbiV YNOV✓ Lq �p.ItL> CV.Y �Y V��^✓ ua r auk "=agoctl a� �o.^. aLa'ZIR IL �' ��99 baa �p m V Cv i�c6 ��r✓. .wu�2�0ip e�.Y+O �C�pa uGy Y.�'L4 w.� O Y✓G OW Y G aLtlsZO OIT v0» C 3L^ e]C�~�� 0�3�✓a0�.,,Y.�.�$y bat 0 gYf.�N. ✓rrY.0 iCtl�.s✓S M A^OL✓O. S O.0 `ow N. ^Y Od Y p� ®NW 7Y✓L L�jE4 R�6Yw 2-9 2_ 4■ O. W IGY w 9VVqq CN a w L O.Sp M N CN.p.R q�9 y.Nd MY :+COS QpY OI tO' 1M�' OINSSF ^ MpyAV H p �C'✓K YOB a O OIR CJ O. CCIG O^4 > �Cggs ���a^ VISwe % E✓M> .1 ^� S as NL=+R. ceN TL ^.ti 4d @' ^fie nEC«„'� �ou� {✓{���uc l.q,..w0 LYCCO RSV' HCygC OYY •�.r OV OptlG VR S tO{!�V Y •6 C uGy.�C✓ M Y 6 M C O A ��t4l. `C L:V OC>V tl� C N tlC �Ya NUC Y.L `Yf V `3u`ocaiN .5 45oa'r."+ ¢�yrS <N11 $f s4 U F-11H. 'i �� • � � «Y�i C}MOO CC C. n , .7 i �'■L Yu Y ^NY O+iV � Vsi iO Oa�i6 a NY 72 tic IL ~L r PS yrbOO aY Qp{ Y »g,{�LLLyyy�C e r� .� As v� O+- c e.i. cid`pw•ca:sc, ^_ alv�'evi a�n Ca+w da VY _ L6r �d C Q pp'n C.■ u..fi��f! a Y O Y O S C ayC O^ ASL dYT.�GG Cam.�. a6, Y�33ggg�gg����� CY� N«N�YOYSO uY■p0 gNwCpi +� p. SC7 w'r' y0 Qw^Jom• 'NV O4 = .Vr.W :i b ®YLLJ . L 2 = V�CJ= � -8GHY N Y,y�YI C �►c^.p O Y S N C t T-.. L Y+ 4 C�CGr yOdq 4+�OCC �N=O `aO VET=. H�L Cc O Y L G Y N yi W.R. ^ + C:O L r0 Y E N Y N L Y�C d^ �,Y■ q G M q t q �S' N. V . C u z N CL vy w O d 1r y + L O�I^ 1']O >)> U Y M L.S C Y ® O • �.O s C y_a•C. is a' YG CR M +CL6 +�ryO yL 'aM.uOC MR Q:C�p«Or`� MNp`OYq� 9L"� Ga C aOp Ci Am O��c ■+�.�C O�•'p tl L OIp� E..G r$c wq L' ' i�..0 ... iNiQ q wCW NFL)=N I�'�C _i^OqE dS YC�m ri^ ds� ^i N IY � d M �+Cq� G«GN M9Y+.CW •Y« Yi»g+Wu CEO � Yi.pL'q+ �}Oy� *' �y�^ qQl ou qua •`eta C�SA� cNV�� SEM NN L��N�IY O C+CO a>`COCyy CC�wqq y1O ^.WEp^9. ++ '. NI 9 OE n OI rN.,L S..w 2 ^q + ` MCO ^Y «YCC" IrY LC v w �a 000 i LOLLSi L� V^.Y.L ^S tlN ^v LMS qW.. Oo ^N `yYq■ b. E aO-- L. K11 AgC pp tJ® Cd ��V 2 � _ oCN.S «N9.Y Qy6 C«j er .®+ �jY VN.�w� �+r ��YF i a� $ Ell 6i+ it L- aj$� '+ qw$I +n �� a' usY w .D Ga L- w Cq 15 e C:L Lam« Ca^� ' qG 60� 1ifF Cu �QMCI— ,M9. a^!d �eutc^ tm �N.e aLYa rLn. srCO €r^a�o� +oc °'N NYy W`q-^a. Jd li M Zf� =.'Y CS�SU pf wS• Myy6Ni�+L6 .. `:OC O�•r+0 `.�S a�i 4w G vIH L_ w� pOL'p. 7N q6 S LyyY .. y+ip�b N C ^ + Y C py G I$q Y Vy.� ^Gu 0 F v w C_ O a g O F N O r C+ A q y+0�«y` OAS /��8� tL ■C YV ;+ pq^+^.���yC•� VY ««yp Yy� O aypyp+ pGp Vaq(� tl+i tt� G� c� CYSV Y9yyyII<.r�:NA Nyr 6V i.isu + IO O D N6 V,.V OL 016: C q d a-01� w p^qa 0 � L L �Y1 l L�NC p Y YD V �010 . d HY o9 NOt YN. ^ tl O�qq i �66 � L.N a4 L ��:M ONMyy:LLY Oa p.�r� L A gift 7 OGO. dc� u of 1L p�M >c ue L q Y M q O.�C G•L p Y Y C y9 L1 N plp N 4 r uy is I.pO ��O Ox YC.V ANS.4 Lr.. Ly10�6 _Onq p.py C O C.1..0 CI C M� NCC Ly Y.a GI�(fONL6L1^may ONO2.. a v V Pf V pY 0 N N Y O..N 'O Y N Y a d^N L V L C A V N y N �Lm.r 1: ad O 01 Y V w L.N V 4v1/Iw pN Y p. 1~1��~ ^LL - �w � CLY Nam'ZEZ OL^NMY9.0O5SQ pV }� N ....W C M Y C w. L N N O L L y p U CM y .�Y Yyyyyyy Z M N: I L�L l QNp QL .t..lYl ri VL' N .. N.014f�.L^.p.0 y1`yam ^tp yu 1.N�MyN <Nr. <N 3NC I�NL Q.N Y��OIi OI�yl O.p <S�BO. <Y uL. cAML O C A 6 G u+w ^ a ^ p w IT;rn'E � . Q o...Y c ^ww Np'� � Ka L O.. YGL C6L Y.pC QOIy C/�d ws Si- _;o'c CC vs- mc L� u�Aj 4V y�1 i w N'p p p a6� VOy^�aN Y .Va^ iiiWWLu ^�qyT�1 4� ��`dC V aYpra p.u, V 41 Is C Cw C � CCY� 6 iLJJ L ItN OL Ned Cp NQ Y CC L Y VO ^N N pV C'Y YO^SYp 4 N M A L yp Z.. •9^ Y QN s r^ e Qg r�L5 1..a w�� p� piety. �e-k'�p . ,� p, +af^jO S c� �•rl�. � 4®� �u�1i� a.� i6Ylr O.C�i iYOim 1. .LpV GW 0..A0.� � ANC (��p�` !6Y L u ^ 6L «C. L� MCL.V �QL A� Y U17 00 W C pp l ptO 4 KK p1 M y O y N• p �w w�t�'~0 oo..Y+Si DyNe^_�1 •N■r.�. � G 4C q+q 'c )� O ypw'. a�e c •M 7.,.Vp ^6+ ...V 6.^. r i oT' �1I1 u. _pyya L Ln® a <v« �.c`um <t a.`ca4: .rio <M�! W41..6rN8.Or r c -23 Nyg Am. Y�V A�N HH �SY �..Nw p.� yygl yaa{• LgG6 yV Qp;z K !!=a tl <O of -'s L. GN WwG- y�Ca n a.N Y y w OL 9yy4 OC.J uLO J 4GyA d M. AR! C^yq� O A^Y _ W ��� 01Y$ q'4 N✓O W q�Lp ,��� yYyM C fGia' A •L �.¢O QOtyi�.y L LN. F' Y■Y U 9CyT.,O. �Y81� � GL Yi%N IOTA^ Cy Ytl CC = W`qC L=Lyq rO q�OY a1 QL L.o LC� OC> �3.bJ q.Q Vou�� _ ^yO,..eY.N =•Osy yOgy.y .-� V).^.'L ��6 p.Y�1^ppp����p� O!!,•.CO YI Y(�y� .CV 9 LY O C G V cyy-vyy •> O M pp C u R ^L V Y Y Gr: YtYYq ^.9 RiO9i qON. S S.fYl y tlCANYY CGO .'J9IgIl y�Y idG S r^ca ^a.. oYari<� N ~ CYi GO ri G ANY of mL ev.v�a: .$. N YyY ✓ CM Ny yL Y�y.G NyM:. � �'O OG. .1�C•i._.,� >^�� wp qC y C Y U=A d G C,C Q�LG d m Y r: pCCN D M d. P N Y C UC Yasa@i NA9U M�LCrr� NVp � C Y�V}�, rrOM Ad yi ��6Y:O q v'm �`:o$ aA a Aa � So o a 0:a 3. W SS .saYY. i VlI n`i v y �.1 CN�a2 Y0 -VN M qY C NG O�Y 3�C MO�gL G rJ y•L• 6 Y ��� r :N ye q A C a C • 0 m 9 Z. e� ti.NV 1 it C V tl.N. 4q. a� Yz.e Y r Ar a O G CNr. �. CAO� V L`tt{![! Wear ^iG.N+G'�C�. .sYgN aie VG 21 VL . t ccd. 8%.N �0.,>.A C yVyy aCT Q 9G it A3` gi6gi.C.0 NL L%rp}'°L` > yG n Z. vLGYa4ayL� IC1{■0�1 sw®L y�Y.2ODNL1-C -LC G O 1L_y CC G Y^ A N D V 4d A N> y Q M Y >y w av w Y sae .AlvL!'� M3..wa 5r rry1 {{����!f!yy S`' r Y.jdC ` O w pp �wON �y YSN �V+nO C OI PNQ AL4C 0 +a 6y LOi gtllu Gp 9Y�y b0 �' �80Pw. a y>w ^.c 8 N n N C O $ Mi9 .N. N•`�a y {�� yp SG y CC ggqqiiii p y. �j pa C5a ' V C �4 L« y � � u^M�e9 Lgi I. fr� ap Iwo �'Y))GN$, - �i ■ •p CM _ www:�: CL NYC ^YY ^O^C. 1AVgO. GN Lew yptTd Y1r{L YL I LIw Ny AV � N. a 9ldG G w y aa g q L A�YO q OwVV of y �vvL� �>wIn =^ �9.CtY q dq COI L'C V Y O �Y Ls rr Aay.0 q N N Nll�gM p y9 CYp� d V YONCtY �Up/ h Y �^� C O1wp� y _`.VCO.� y■S L�W 0y0 H N. J L m t. I.e i s s K'.L O O V M wM W ll. y■W c} b Y Y C < `�f wf `� �f �f N �1 Ni �f � �• ,�1 �� o o Q oAML C O V S3 �j y p N C Np q o ^L 7 L w Rim ,G^�� L^ a aT cI A $ � O.LC 10Y G W Y � �r•O EC Y,Oxo pV -M 01 O `ra Y�yr u, Lf.E NNL.Y.G■. �4L O�Y J a 4.9 W p E O G_r C V ^ w. y■a G N L YNyPj® y�1 CY aN�N Y O•aH n O '--" W a tVJ�nNY LI� v w. UY. pwr C. y� q^ y Jd I [YN�Gw pCp Y O L d1®� 0 O O • d� M 9�1L � O u L 9.' y��=u.U � qG Rom. O"IOO�Cq Y C��G FN O� ' *e.O.ud La CV�Oa} N�•`66L Y�■YCi �GOIa =01 ai 6N LV.. yQ'�LY.pp� 9^ ;I + p C Y i_� CC C O W G v •L••Lj 'IO,t V i'M K MSol 14 W Y i p.Y Ltl1. OI yGU.00{ya}. 44GMLLO tF OfLt1 aL•7!• LOyt .YE �y Vim. p AS p. LN E~ OD. ,y YV Y� 5.yw • OL•i�Y tI +w +G R. OYA3q )1G` LChM Caw^b yCOOY q'O a EGnO �.•'9 �OY.V.4 OBI~M Cs iVy CFp. Vi1N My Up N mG=.a V=a �< G A•`r P ^�I.mI.O ^� q r �Y.YO+ QSi *®A yea yyyvyl 8y Ys —QC N EhtY �s� i �. yY a y pr�j + 353 � � y a� ^ aVOeo c $d O S ^N:j C^ ® Ol yi yci. C CxY O. 41 1. �y yE EE d+.FK'O '' O oY L1 f Ci0 V4•N Y ^ LY GY tiNi pNaCs.L 6 YW aO LLLL L -T- Y �! tl i.M3 p�N .. �V U M qY Q �Y �Y S�v�� FLU yy L.� Y $..•y 0 A Af- YL 'J it_CV r0 y�. .�(S�yb i y`.d Z�y{. wY34� f C� VS'y GGam. IP OI�� M^ ¢pM OPp �•3 1 M .. _.I N Y� O. a.�a YA=. ZVOE `V '4(VY1I C GG f� ow o �LC��pysO 3ui� bd16 .i _^� yJ`4 CC3 6 a2 'S Vittt GOgF GYNpY �IYA O�L8 eVi,C$CN 01. 6 q 3 v �N OE VS MN 1G LO a�. O� w S La.•�a«ay a•�.� paOS OM 9T�O�• _ y.C� pp LM GO.M ^LN Cy�w (Oyy]( ` YY� NYV N� aC.fLY•CM.O O LO.�.i�:L } L . e C`Co oyy� o t '�d ss =float v e= y.,e 1.Y.op CV.IC v4.` YY N. NC C C =0Y L� q ee^Y��1`6•i N. Q.�O L O a O i n iG.� . NUQu Y.Y N.uM : .O.N 0--Z + 7 Oy y Y aY— qti Y O y ■{N N—+ •Lt. {�O.p `u C C {1. b y V Y Y .ri c p u Z. Y"uS cNC2-2 N w w W,i, O d .yEez d�kd: 4 yV G�� a 4 V Cd Lv Y' C Vyq. ~CSC OI�YQ V� eVC +' v yY�O1 CN V �� E �Y� �L 2c N Vi a■ a $ T; 3 pit v c« .CU N+ LL L�� •• �, E yYL e y � a � S � �y yN ka C ?Jv` tl.0 4 L� O MpW LO Yy=aco V prs p� ae.N yC iE v■L `� p uY 'i aL s L„^Y,•~- 'C`L '� alb, yyE 3Eca` a cY lYL^g a cc co �u a p� CSa W LY �3 4CLy L y _� C _�' ■�. Q..� �� MO y+•~O•.Y.OG M.� W� =L 4od V�p � {{Y�1ta VLdC �Y�c — ��•� LaC C� CV VYdC ..may. LN Y■iG $ Ga. -L aM` L.�p V. • `� L J N W + `U�c W R. C �.{� L.Y a L �C�JW NO olp � Vc N ass a a a. Mv o L +� •�p 1. � C C V Y.O. L Vs. L Y o D McpV a MY,,` a Y r O C Y.�.. 5 «w 6—'� $tee '=,z ^aw C _ i Q. _ yo �s �it Ycom N 'L:E~ —JL~ Y —L M ` aY � c �YY C C it p 9 H IL Y CG Y L C9O -is �K \\ Mad _CGV v E r C Sy43 VT —Ss �l �Q +Y frN � Z. , C `L.Y O ~p� O�C Y M O Y N[I i N N M Y Y 9 N +— •. s' y�!$ ode gp~ ter;, �_ YIV ~vim s C M W .L Y Y. CL Gi y MY` 6NI.i NvWO KO.W FyW.j eye, lA 01 •J NNg7f 1.1 yf Z.2 ". LLC W'q n coop i� C JyOy� W = J c as 01 u� gg r i C L vL�: Ada 0 a c L a o� Qa �Y L au C C 4 w O y �6yVy pp Nyyp-- 00 it QM .O I z Ca 4 V�po r G yV Lfi YQS ► HYN p � � p V� CC`. C C C • tlVOq ZO.Y `H)Y '_`t nw.` � LSw try t' tea" 7o'' 's C V Y M ♦ � � y0 r_L O L V Y c. 4. ds� o '^ �N you eT.bo .-22 ^f .5� eyaC. ®b ®L ANC. ■r� COV yYO N 2 vV aV Crg^i C!^OLd••p! �qN pI VV it m Izz 2. 5 N V �Y L V� C 4y p N L \.0 Cb O.Op O• "C V a CY Y p Y b CN _O8! ^dcc rpq YC SIC. wCa I ^ VO Oi tlGT G It c1 CO Y•.{C� N a00V ' {p1J pq� H Y.3 a�YL c�._u LV b 4O 8N o YY Ca. =ram iVL p> C �C•AG�sF7�rN: ■Q3��Ni pP{y�(MOYY.I pVCtivpt L(Oy�M+. ^p ay C�seyqCj. e�N •� CO^N�O. *4•N11 raVO �0 . ok• :5 UC Y� y-9 & 6 21L C YppM C Lt d <O. ham. . 6J,b1L 20.i� •�N.a REST.`:UTION NO. 88-239 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING` TRACT NO. 13945 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE, OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVENUE IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL. DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APH: 207rt 71-018 A. Recitals, P (i) Citation Builders has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tract No. 13945 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 14th day of December, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho `Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occur-ed. B. Resolution. NOW, WHEREFORE, it is hereby founds determined and resolved by the Planning Comrisson of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically i'lilds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial e.ridence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on December 14, 1988, including written and oral s`.?ff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; acid 3. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. 4hat the proposed design, together with the f conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attachedhereto and incorporated herein by this reference. KANNING COWISSIUN RESOLUTION NO. 88-239 DR 13945 December 14:, '1988 Page 2 Design Review 1. The concept of 3600 architecture shall be used on all elevations with architectural detailing (i.e., siding) being wrapped around the sides of the building for a distance of approximately three feet. m 2. The use of the Brown Cobblefield veneer shall be allowed. However, the Wisconsin Weather Edge veneer is specifically not approver). 3. Real river rock shall be used on some elevations in order to tie in with the sound wall along Highland'Avenue which incorporates rock pilasters. 4. The sound wall along the north tract boundary shall be consistent with approved Tract 13063 to thf east and shall be six feet in height, Qr the specifications of the acoustical report. 5. Tree Removal Permit 88-64 is approved sub,iect to replacement windrows (Eucalyptus maculata) which shall be prow;ded along the south side of Highland Avenue and shall be 15,gallon in size and planted 8 feet on center. Other replacement windrows within the interior of the tract shall be planted 8 feet on center with 5- gallon Eucalyptus maculata. Infested wood from cut Eucalyptusl trees shall be chipped, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for minimum six months,, sealing the tarp edges with Soil,;, u prevent emreging borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood, 6. All corner side yard walls shall be constructed of a decorative masonry material. 7. Front yard setbacks shall be staggered up to 35 feet in order to provide greater streetscape variety. B. Streetside landscaping shall be provided in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan requirements. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The project shall be constructed consistent with the recommendations of the Preliminary Noise Study. A Final Noise Study shall be submitted prior to issuance of building ,permits 'in a standard format as detkrmined by the City Planner, Said report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adaquacy of mitigation measures included in the building plans. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adontion of this Resolution. nn e,010 PLANNMG COMMISSION, RESOLUYION NO. 88-239 OR 13945 December 14, 1988 i Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 147H DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: A. ra—rV T. R c na L ATTEST: a r, ry L' rad Buller, Secr'ftary of the Planning Commission of th;� City of Rar,ho: Cucaanowx, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly,',id' regular'y introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of,the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a,regular meeting of the Planning Corriission held on the 14th day of December, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, MC NIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COWISSIONERS: PONE Aft ABSENT: COW41SSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK i Y. .. i ��iuI`4«up• �«.a. ccoq C,o eqr=o. _.__c moo. 4m .4,u + CL tl O pr YS� L U O �.y���i`VOCN OLfJ O. p�Y Guym A V. rC$ nc y�r •o i d p�.Y C q+_ 4 b w L $C.w C y�O.L. +.Q..+ O�. S V G 6N �..'Y U G N• V O.3 O q:Y M Y O �y S:4 C 6�a O w I ^4 N.L.• 'e.� e4 �'•� CM pv+ lug C -V V �C.. LLr Y..T r �.0. y�^d. r O■ yU C +r C dg c4 V..gMpa, `os t]ya��'a..9� os Lea J1 s•� s6 aLUV. � Btl4i.MJ� Wr rYV:.)J}Ls� pV4�c ^y� s� 4.'"�.�3y,3go $.z�g•� ys&. 4q.`A�r .+5tra� 'o •�9`"� VilCLL^��W V�'rM rVaf �s0 '� q UA Nd �L talyg .lA COr C C�q�adtM C-.�V V wCC gyp �L pO�i Yq e. C L O p E+t.5 �.rdi s«ri a.YwrS QMse. J�. 1`�®it'a t.��nia 4 7 Pull is It 9E h 1 NV y y ��wM ��QV h K. 6�J.� � d W� tlN^88• �L CSsV�yy W 5 ` Ste. �C 1 a1.4 gas II N tl e t�. T q. �r6 Qa (TddPOIn Ny3w. ¢.d� pG1 @■®� y B � c � w p�.OLi GC.0 OVo �f . . Y YYYVY c.u'Ld.o N.oY� a� w o�v . t� Y crsi�pc�.G k �tlyll p0_N A L« » Y Vp. O■ a OyLY`y Y{s1;, Y d`iI$ GpwrC. O O $ O YLwC YNw Y N r Ze'i4 .. N•°«.1 «L4eYV.,rS O•G. .+.""L Y=is �'�w Y +." ,..m '9 w ao . o`.F y r� S.So e'.. e•^pp oL..b -is up V E NCCH�L p O.0 Y. G�U9 IBC OS N�:O `qO�.0 V H L � YqO6 by I, �L 9 .t. �V�.00Y 1�aQ {Qj�QCQ 21.�'O VY:N ^OSCVy Yy � • 1pQ ^O1 A BIB..�_�Y�O MM c■O, !(9 y w� 6 C N r O Y C-p S L G ;«pIG�J/� N�«NC`.FNVnj p4 g O BO.H G«d®0 C �. Gp Y 3.5 za G6Y. Y.O�••p� a"oY 23 �Gpp aN np C yyQ1 V y q �G C_a +�0 N �a L V C I OSLC CVy.+Iq,,, O�YL ...«y�d$ O VQA G9 C V0 s VA1a +C C t N dr i R Y O �a o p ��s/Qaa$� , 'Cp�'^ES •¢N,a 36$ i� +a �ZZ0_ �E.C9 •��y}' N Oda �.0 QyC.a�ey P. Y�M.5 q� CV` 11 GO C.� 9► `��_V� 6C Y.M p Gyp P V qq V YYtt �.8 y s q G V q 6 Y V«T««8 V p yli Y L C P. V G ow N0 N Aft lT TS�u .Y�Y s.4iC �V� a^ w ��Nr�O��.0 YiL9 CSsYM OUY ff[ �Y} Y �.G~ 4.IyV YGG5 0 �62.2 rm� YCCa _O 12 O Y Y Y NO � � V I � M_�V� _ N�.w Vy a 9v �e a w�r Aa_ �� ^w� ���!� w -.: �yq�Y pO qL �yy� VY I�p,.� p� t�V •"®S�P �CC L• pbYy1 :cc 6� �0� C�.� So . � 99QQ�•,,\ ��yL Ma MV M V ".yyd. V'*� vV _Y I.I_O =YOB V ' pVw �Y� t 6.. EMEE .r My 96 �^..•.'.."�.C�888�> qfM,,�� NOG q{Q1I�S .dam C y� �j L G yr Cs o� lC.Cpc tlM ffiMLw�y �LW y S.« W4G _ Lp2os zu p' O C. C a 7� Y a T g pi:Sa3 g ..x_- a Ct� `NAP+{ �gO Ua-` In a-- Y.C=VyN V b�p) C w* w tl �sp6 `� qiq a V.. ` �O� N�Vyj'S C J 4rCN L_ 6^T»' tlYC... !: V V 7 Y Y `y« y%9y e 4��ee O. pp N its r auew«ap @.a.GC {ma{yy $y s.� gT S'Z /� WHO � Nam Sr. _ y.�0 O.Oi N�ee w «Y�_w. C' V ®qV` yOLLV V Oi Y N tl!V •O f M O . al Y A N f. ® H a y�O• 4 MQ�j$ E we ��si4#qee qq� • {r`.�j o $ u�6a$pe qCedp�Aw '�sG ^u +l. ull 3aqyC �cGae..«C.%C Ni I-a fig_ CJV11 Wci► r g..OL _ ut� O O�O C aaO G �T C �w O�CO O'�N N L g O �L Ip O 6 • V Jaya f 46� Y0 bat 9 COL g010.�;Yq�'L C,y LUW y p. Cr. C4C O• MNd B€i L o �v wY�C V Y Hp V O �O\`4gYOND�y O�Y'M nJ �+ Y q H W O U ouWq N I $ L.�• M iy qqo pY.+.0 nY cN 9 C C U ! O yl iRYry Cop sy Y�y VQ= LW` pO'Yr3W C= y O`G O ^a�{y O1 N C Y N OIypL gCYM _9y 6^c 6Ny _Vd---V��`JILC ..tit . Ct~ YC OY 40 t•w0. OG. aCC dqt- OYnLY Cy C u`SCo O.tlqq y pp� G.�CC9 �C N i h y~ O.^�"'•S CN 7 S OIwB 01 Y O q'C L L Y fl NAM vWYYO � 6 GN 'O N LY.y ON�CC- �COY.� i O^ N y NL 4L q Y Y d 9N Y _C N" O 1 M M 5 O Y Y yYY y b W�M{p1 yn N O.LA^Q�W »■ C �. ■._�O Y YL*•ll ~� C 4 L y L' C N�O.�9 C N L.m� OIY•^',32� �O O• 1 _ L�V� O ~.I p^ ��.� ^9 Y y��u C L Y Y��N t L y6!•?`S V L W V K3a nu^YL2¢lL k 75=� c c"d moo... 3os LCY�r Yp+p$ �.v a e q wY LYL 9 d� 4x5! YN� aaY���N ^ CCL t�L�gqW O CY ^CO q ^W L i y�`"� aN lei^ din B,yIO F`+ai <N-2.2 Ofq Npp{V� Cy�a C GO ZM^00� CYO � M O2dgypip ,. 6 0 +UQ O.3Ci w1 �Ngall YZ i 4w V 9 41, a C • O 'p j P Op V^ 2. aa »W+q �wy Yai u itl ^. yN O :5.12 yt•. AIL*O Cma .K. p `S O-®yam: ��w byG d p p0 sy9. VYp YA GC.Y I�y W'O�t L dyy• Y g q�qf cc 4y yyY O E qd�y {{{y}iiiIO OIN Wg � yY�®a � eat Vy � Lay+O( ^�pCO Cp N=�a�L Y OmN�g6 -4.� CAY� �NB.b N` ` d®� � • • �1`G., �d.�Ee B� OGN �1ra QA 6� gljQ .M y�N•�b L.^ ;.B Y.V�.S Y C^_0 C.d LO Y �M • :d• � iC C�y�� CLm� �p V� �V.y�'C� O WY 'p yyC Cp y g K O! •� Ea7 6_A�N AWE ®ry�3r BYs _M V C. 3 IV gC' p Y Ctl q9C Y �N a ArE M`. �P rOYV d.N M�ti® COYd�. ±.CN�e 01yye�a O W9 C NWd{�� lv DTI ldi�.OL yO �A 01 c c z y- �C LVN M Oy O V`N ij�� a� Cy NO yLV Y 44- K a•.r C K 9 1r it Y C O» e p w Q.id' <tl ►0 e i Cp ` `:d L � � ^ N f'f O Hf •p q N N o v 5�3 NQA yy�.O Y. Cep Cn'p M^ .'T c O C ♦ d01 t�1 P • s �}j� �- � �.. "LAG . -its 'j.z2 h m--iCO Q.0 apt '^ Ytl uY 95 ®`GiO `oYQX noa _ OL 1 �O l4tO. Y U p L N u` y F.. a li SY V4 aaf0.. NW x�w °'irj � 6Jwgsa duo y�{y1 v��O �y�tudL6 +�da. 'vcQ �.�. 01.11 Y �. Any -0 O LOIr L h e+a d � c y yYN }¢ram Vw a� .p♦' x �aai N� Y.VOA�wOR.._�. ^1L0 uyW YOB O G tlM w�Y �y Ytl�C - ■p 4 A g i Y'_' Z � 4 �$ai t2Y .^+cat f 1 9 sp�0 w -M Yfj� ~�c�7Cj. L t' 5 �OGG�� 2: L�p Y .LYC i y+17 y9�^ OyC iiiiiAAA{{ gp gg..�Ca uaulC' Xac.ffi tl Yy C Y V D u C V@ tl G tl O J � V1 Y C L 1I d.. Q y ryy 1 Y fi�jj OM^N 0�V M.iqp d A0 �yy L V�& E p 19 �dV'. a -- 2 yY tl LRt HNV. �4 VO NN CCA0 1.5 0 ♦Y+�'Cw NM O S. sY.p L �e`C•�S Y=u �6Y.L ` t Ste^ 9 L Wf�� �O• C _O F.tiOW 6 ib�60{LN ��.wp N N d y� _ 1 I G� d V ec 192 u. 2lil.Y w..Y qY i0 Yc:ES S .2 .2 Qptl V G �1 dp Y ��� �_qtl y a D L•+. JpYy VNO,'' Oy 1 c p p L • � C dIti 101 pOU� � EC`0 ye �s� � pO CLY p C L{Y� yp 4 d ypW L T C C p w^ St S $w� : $ ,sue ,�T C O l' 9 O .' 9 '� L.. _ _ y t s � s y r^ P I,. y 0 0 ! 6 y a a > Y O` c L W_y _CC Y R1 rl O N. Pq ~qY � §Otl YqM Y � r A.i6 w Y.L.S YQY.<�y,] �Y.�� Yr Ne^If• �tl 0^` �"L 0. �' d tltl0: •e ee. y6 � ¢S_O O^0 Y s:f1 t��Y�cM ®� _�.a p uy�c �!. tv Y._r N� + N se f� ggqqGG c p p y p y C^10 p1 ^ i j® �0 y i O� G.0■ o�M� ycVA� Cy O9O a`yYi �. 0 6 N Zoe �.y� .� �C p CC yy YCNCY U y Y rLYi C.rUcLy08 Ii a Y:0 0w .�..LCO® ! 1d �MtaIYM '1.4®a S Y�OI 4!. OVww U a M o c c i Y Nw L`O®YO b�Y9y Y O v q�w0 3i�• x�p NYtl p 4O.Y !— e'iO e5 Ne �' HE _ IL►� ryC L`aa q69 s y' '.►OL. V�. ib 'O yYy4N0 'r C er L Y EZ LLL �ywy YtY L y6y�L rde -� CO.u.G �L YppO a YM LYY � YV -LIZ .C..0 CI ww YNwM as " A.�. Oy II O CC= u YO.O Y�O^i GYN.. ` Y N�. SIG c c Y U Ll so` T�C N {� �N y-, N' V D Y r ■ ` d Y O� pL O.. M. Y. �CqTS.�pp OOQQ+�.CT V ,bdC CCN y� tppi a '�M. qC�. ►�u gOg ax COY Y{►L g C a i COI ,Vp L . `y py�N Lq 4.�OV IO�YO Q! O � V�T07.�i[ ta� O� 6C Yr `^Y•CVei." r�. �! 6^ L► i o. 7 t►fC,J�Y `�. �® �4 CpY q�OyY y� �O a L M L.Y V. $M C Y O. L k% '� QC C ��L` aT Q�►� 04 .. C OS� !Y L Y 4��►i 5 ®yy® q p f O Y Vp e3 �LC M �Y®�i � 2 CA `CHY =2^W` �C ►O O bdsV ► �V. Y G Y o �Y���pgyL otoY�.. ►��YQ�e�_�3Y. �vg.cY.i^.c& _^��E„y'^wa►t«a '_L� iiarbw�.l�`Yh MA@�t+`ao�.Y�. `^Z.T^_gyo s•gL CCC Y`99a-�yyOpMYq y$�II�' .8&N.2 _eOb CC. U Oc4.1ppg 8 yy CMWV Ci; o ggll aL ' . i C'zt^ iLc vee.&I a bb 6e cKcws O` b6p a. Cg T �.35 V C�.Nm Y4e.� NVL3�' N^ _ ~ A.-A a� e&ET-Z 9 6^Lp�` tl6tlA opo Jw 'VCQe• ^C. ®0Y Yo a pNO P mJ Oz-c LL ® ®C g. O1 S Y a�v y Q p. r`t O L �+ CI v3.1 MCBE ~WO.if �i� r�¢¢QpQyyT.� L$ L-9' I. ^g 9c_p�e z ® IY.0 Vim` C2 Q V. w; '^ pg. N06�r Ry Tp � �. w �qa■ O� i0. w Vq T®i T 4�L^' - Cie Oa Y {Y0�1 C G o.�$ vvi L V y p Y ► GY K O w Y 6M Y Y i WN W Vf.i p Y p N i p�o.II lri y�p®oH C fi � 4 q A u j 31, $cy� Y'J.�C Q O by Y M 9CC N O C V 6Y CL •S p^ rS _ ��Qa^ p C C S oNY' Y �G S OMMyyy oNo S LVs yy�.Y4 L U Y O Z0 A _Ni0�.. YN WY + Lf,� pp• ¢ ±S Y N 6,2 IL � o v prJ q a• �'O N � O i��� p �w 1� L L. D L..^ 4.Y � �i p�oL c� •L�YL � aY Y$a.Y. a c� �_.NY c o`�a � ', up jo _ su nWgp Is ^M�•p[ N+ L a D'L V.V yYa� YYC q cbYA W a«ga� R o+� YS ypV. • Li OMwyV� « Y. UVY^YY Y�YH Y.tlyyN YCC tl Y.� p cC 7LI air NO O�Y Q5 OAS WY EEG a6 iodV "C� G O �N.YW .4 qM I g c o Y u M o Y a ^ •�Y Cyy 1 Y a S !� L 9Lay W O�.S O Y d y Y N 1 � L SCCY 90. C®.Y ei ` 2.gal CMO y Mp CpLl�. wqGSC �WC'J a` � I Qom $ ^� As- 05 E.ese S�wgg Q «aJ &p,y`33d a c?oey i►�. g qY �� � •d �4 C ` M 1 ``�G ����4 ''N ^Y Cw 6 YI 0 �0. yC� ■yy `y Y _yy y• N 3 t�y o�« L$qY 9 w L a Q�` W D E ttY Y <r Y ^!A` HE g®1Ci1.0� �M 0 LZ I oZ eYY • JOa a 4 Y� bn g$- s$ 1w O�b Y Ly- 4a' 4 0 L OODf _ �O y O �Ces1 m I a L Vepn yil _00•� V OIV C Z. r O 2- 3' .5 o y Ob 1!x1.MV L vy O L yW`ll eB y L q T CaNO lYY Y � V sY -VV w vyM6 6N OY v::26 wC O b ;FpVV� pN.e G �N34.O g^gO i.®.. = bS 3-i2' 0. N O Y 2. Zo( L (L6�� qp`. q®q® a pp yy b K_q+�}1ee O.v tl r 06 tip, ibpvN r. f:C Ni `':• ` � y V `� F � 1.2. V `AI -91 WE$r s o�p��NN xueJ 6Ppa i O. yy - ..N g o f<K i•.e�1�� KW Oar KH aC �rS �7. •r KGB bJVG04r. r Ma �.., RESOLUTION NO. 90-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION J APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF A CONDITIO.,N OF APPROVAL FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 'MAP NO. 13945, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 207-071-018 i A. Recitals (i) On December 14, 1988, the Planning Commission approved, subject to specified conditions, Vesting Tentative Tract, Map 13945, Resolution No. 88-238, which provides for the development of 35 single-family lots on 15 acres of land in the Low Density Residential' district of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. (ii) On April I8, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meetinq and denied the use of Systems Development Fees for the construction of full intersection improvements, includ Ig traffic signals at the intersection of Highland and East Avenues, as spS-,ified in ANIL Special Condition No. ,/ of Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-236, thereby causing said condition tn.be waived. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho,Cucamoga as follows; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part ,A, of this Resolution are true and correct: 2. This Commission concludes that with the -waiver of Condition No. 7, as previously stated under Recitals, Item (ii), it becomes unnecessary to construct full improvements within Highland Avenue from East Avenue to the westerly boundary of Vesting Tentative Tract 13945 at this time. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, int'uding written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby approves the { requested condition modification as follows: t h PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. 90-56 VESTING TENT TRACT NO. 13945 MAY 9, 1990 PAGE 2 a) Modify Condition No. 6 to read as fo'<lows: Construct Highland Avenue full width\from the -west boundary, of.Vesting Tentative Tra' ,a3945 to the east boundary of 71ract 13063 to-,the east. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the costs of constructi..ng the improvements an,l acquisition of the necessary right-of-way fronting Tract 13063 at the time of their development. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shay! certify to the adoption of this Resolution_, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MAY, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. BY Zan Chiti ice Chairman ;l 'Z ATTEST: d Buy , Secret ry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Citj; of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the `oregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopte by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cnoq. ission held on the 9th day of May, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA,-TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Ar3ENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY QF RANCHO CUCAMONi-, r,'IFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSIOI FOR VESTING TENTAT TRACT NO. 13945, FOR 35 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15 ACtt S OF LAND, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRIC': (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVNUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THrREOF APN 207-011-18. A. Recitals. (i) Citation Homes has filed an application for the extension -of Vesting `;Tentative Tract No. 13945 as described in th?, title of this Resolution ' Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject `Time Extension request i. --;'erred to as "the application." (ii) On, December 14, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88-238, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Vesting Tentative Tract No. 13945, and issued a Negative Declaration, (iii) On May 9 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 510- 56, thereh,',approving moditication to Engineering Division Condition No. 7, as container in R� o's�stion No. 88-238,. (iv) On October 10, 1990, the applicant fileC a reg4est for a twelve month Time Extension. (v) On Ja:tuary 9, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on th`:t date. (vi) All legal prere ,Jisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have ocurred. R. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: . 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of 'the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolute a are true and correct. 2. , Rased rlpon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the aoove-referenced puoliC hearing on January 9, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together' with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13945 - CITAT;4;ON �lanuary 9, 1991 age 2 (a) The application applies to property located on the south side of Hirjiand Aven,e, east of East Avenue,, with a Highland Avenue Street frontage of..990 feet, and is presently vacant. (b) Directly north of the project site is Highland Avenue, the property to the south contains singlr+ family homes and; ;is zoned Low Residential, the praWty to the east is Vc_ant and is zoned ,_aw Residential, the property to the west contains one single family home and is zoned 'Low Residential. �c) The subject property is located within the Chaffy Joint Union High School District,. which said District has given written �,nput of their impaction to the City pursuant to Urgency Ordinance No. 395. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon she specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and corciudes as follows: (a) That, the tentative traci-"is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitaole for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury ,o humtns and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health p"olems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the Time Extension subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference. (1) All Cond#tions of Approval, as contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 88-238-and 90-56, shall apply except where mod},lied herein. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIO4 NO. TT 139AS - CITATION January 9, 11991 Page 3 (2) Approval shall e' i-re on December 14, 1Q91, unless extended by the Planning; ,inission. (3) Prior o the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project site to provide, i'n conjunction with the Chaffey Joint Union High School District, for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if the School District has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territo q of such existing District prior to the ` recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes firrst. Further, if the Chaffey Joint Union High School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve (12) n;onths of the date of approval of the time extension and p0 or to the recordation of the final map or issuance of buil;fjng permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed lull and void. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APORTIED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MCNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary L, e _ Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rant;ho Cucawingr, do hereby certify that the foreaning Resoluti:;v was duly ;And regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co.'anission held on the 9th day of January 1991, by the foliowiiq vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: n ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESCLUTION Or THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN'iA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSIO3 FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW OF VESTING tENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13945, FOR 35 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED ON. THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 207-071-18. A. Recitals. i (i) Citation Homes has filed an application for extension of the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 13945 Lis described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject -Design Review request is referred to as "the application.-" (ii) On December 14, 1988 this Cc;amiss on adopted its Resolution No. 88-239, thereby approving, subject ta specific conditions and time linkits, Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 13945. (iii) On October 10, 1990, the applicant filed a request for a twelve month Time Extension: (iv) On January 9. 191;91, this Planning ComTiission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a `._ I y nrticed pjblic hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.;, (v) All legal prerequisites prbr to the adoption oi''this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolutions NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and esolved by the Panning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds th, all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are. true and correct. 2. Based upon subs,->ntial evidenon presented to this CommisC on during the above-referenced meeting on January 9, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission herei*y specifically finds as follows: (a) That ne proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (j) That the proposed design, is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is ( located; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO;, TT 13945 -'CITATION January 9, 1991 Page 2 (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provision_ of the Development Code; and (d)._ That the proposed design together-,.,with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public healti;, SaFety,or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. L Based upon thu findings and conclusions set.,'forth in`Paragraph- L and 2 above, this Commission hereby aoproves.the application subject to each and every condition se`, fort•,h below and incorporated herein by this reference. (1) All Conditions of Approyil as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No 88-239 shai" apply. (2) <Approval shall expire on December'i4, 1991, unless extended"by the Punning Commission. 4. The Secretary to this Commissior+ s%al1 certi'. the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS NTH DAY OF JANUARY 1991. 'LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY' OF RANCHO'' CUCAIIONGA BY: - Llrry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: - Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning ommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing r-0—Jution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bly the Planning Cc;nmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coemnission held on the 9th day of January 1991, by the following sate-to-wit: AFES: COMMISSIONERS: ` NOES: COMMISSIONERS: � i ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCI30 CUCAlllONGA ` STAFF REPORT � t is ,S DATE: January 9, 1991 «r. TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission I FROM: Brad Buller; City Planner BY: lom Grahn, Assistant: Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL , ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRAC:i 14875 PITASSI DALKAU ARCHITECTS - A residential subdivision and j design �^eaie:�of 36 condominium units on 3.56 acres, of i land ,in the Office Profassional 'District, a proposed Medium Residential- District (b-14 dwelling units per acres), located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street - APN: 1077-332-26. (Associate•d with this pecject is General Plan Amendment 90-01B and Development District Amendment 90-02). I. PROJECT AND SIT% DESCRIPTIONt A. Action ' Regue lad: Approval of the subuivrsion design, Conceptual Grading Plan, Crnceptcai Landsc�_" Plan. building elevations, and ;issuance of_a Negative Pecra'ralion. B. Project Deasity: 10.11 dwcll;nq units per act.e. C. Surrounding-Land Use and 7.oningr North - �ingle'Family Homes; Low Residential District 12-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Mission Village Apartments; Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) <( East - Sinsle Family home and Marlborough Villas Condors-iums (Medium Residential Di. rict 8-14 � dwelling units per acre) 4e_t - Single Family Homes; Low Re.side!ntial Distri t (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan-Desiona,�o►is: Project Site - Office North Low Residential South - Medium Residential East - Medium Residential West - Low Residential ITEM 0 PLANTING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT `CENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU' Jan:iary 9, 1991 Page 2 Ak r' I E. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant wi vegetation consisting of native grass and weeds. The site" is relatively flat, sloping approximately f4,pr percent from north to south. F: Parking Calculations: Type Parkinn Spaces Peking Spaced larking Spaces of Use Required per Unit Provided -Der Unit Provided 0 Bedroom Unit 2' 72 Guest Parking 0.25 4.36 13 TOTAL 85 I`. ANALYSIS: A. Back?round: Associated ,with this project is General Plan 7 neR&ient 90-01B and Development District Amendment 90-02. The General Plan Amendment proposes to change the.-II.-ice land use designation to Medium Residential. The Development District Amendment r7oposes to. change"-the Office/Professional land use district t5 Medium Residential. Cn, August,22, 1990, the Planning Camnissicn rcvirrG�> the applications and recarmended ,epproval to the (ity Council. The applications are tentativeJ.:v scheduled for review, by City Coy:nci'l or Feb,uary 20. 1991. Please n_te tt;at the. Conditions Approval for Te+tative Tract 14875 specify that arpraval is granted contingent upon City Council approval 6f General Plan Amendment 90-01B and Development District Amendment 90-02. B. General: The applicant is proposing 1F, two-story duplex 9s+�"'13ings (36 units) as shown in E„ bit',""B". The pr:,posal contains one floor play, and provides two eleva tions. Unit A � contains 1,420 square feet and Unit s contains 1,615 ;square feet (see Exhibit "G"). C. Design Review C=,,ttee: On June 21, 1990, the Committee ,ties, Toolstoy, Yroutil) reviewed the project, but did not recommend approval due to the following concerns: I 1. The perimeter fence proposed adjacent t6 the Archibald Avenue parkway should be removed_ and its design,,. incorporated into the,design of the patio walls; PLANNING COMMISSION STAFr REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 14375 -, PITASSI DALMAU January 9, '1991 Page 3 2. Ti;e perimeter fence proposed adjacent to the Church Street parkway should be removed and its design in.orporated into the design of the patio walls. 3. The applicant should consider patio wails that t incorporate 91a>s, lexan, stucco, wrought irons and berming to soften the heightlof the walls. 4. Corbels should be provided below the balcony on the rear elevations. The applicant then.-evised the project based upon these comments and concerns. On August 2, 1990, the Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy Kroutil) reviewed the project and recommended approval with the following modifications: i.. The low patio wall design should include a decorative cap element on teeth sides of the wall (see Exhibit "G°). 2. The revised location of the Archibald Avenue sour: attenuation wall, as presented at the Committee meeting, is acceptable. The Sodes, Covenants, and Restriction, should include provisions for adequate maintenance and regular cleaning of the clear sound attenuating barrier. D. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The rriject was reviewea by both committees and detimined,- :ith the recommended conditivas of approval, to be in confor„once with applicabir standards and ordinances. 11 1 1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed y the cpp scant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and determined that without adequate mitigation, the project could have significant efi°ects on the environment, in particular noise and schools. In response to these cc..,ce-ns, the following mitigations measures have been incorporated: An acoustical analysis prepared for this project indicates that a 7.5-foot high sound barrier is required at ground level along Archibald and a 5-foot_high sound barrier around the balconies along Archibald._-The applicant has responded by provided .a clear - Lexan (plastic) barrier in front of the two southernmost buildings on Archibald avid a solid stucco wall around the northernmost building on Archibald. Balconies will receive Lexar panels. Pursuant to Urgency Ord. 395, written input was obtained from the affected school districts. The Chatrey Joint Union High School District has entered into ar-, agreement with the developer -to PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT TENTAIVE'TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU January 9, 19971 Page 4 leak participate in a Mello-Roos District. The Central School District has also entered into a mitigation agreement with-,hie developer. A special mitigation condition, of approval has been added requiring participation in a Mello-Roos District or other form of mutual agreement with the affected school. districts. I� lv: FACTS FOR FINDINGS; The project will;'be consistent with th,% 1' 'General an and the D^velopment Code' The'project, with the added mitigation measures, will not bF"detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisance .if significant environmental impacts. In addition, th- proposed use and site plan, together +pith recumended conditions of apnroval, are in compliance with' "applicable provisions of the Development Codes and City Standards. i V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has-been advertised as a Public Nearing in the n an alley Daily aullatin newspaper, the property posted with a sup nt`a' -not,fication sign, and notices sent to all p erty ners within 300 feet of the project site. V(spectf REC 1MEN TION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Fer Sa adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval. Rmitte , fj Brad B City P BB:TG:js Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit. "B" -Site Plan Exhibit "C" -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" -Grzding Plan Exhibit "E" -Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" -Floor Plan Exhibit " Building Elevations Exhibit 'V Master Plan Tentative Tract Resolution of Approval Design Review Resolution of Approval S [ ! F-r [o .ems 3f ��_� r• •Y.�+-ems .� '� w...--,.,'."•e a �'',-� �. r C�/.1 = j{. cE i —tom -s •j C ¢r� J Pit '_I^��-�'^_-+_�M sib.' _ :� '� �=J ��4 u �}� .• _={{ -+ -�( S a •.�w. r tCItT O' NME MR I --"ram # • t� � � '�....t _ � �, —1�_'7� ,..r,' .'tt � '--� 1 [.tG t oc eF G ~E ✓ �/� A qemi f ( :. t. 2 i.t al i y t.•� 'iT 4�. r F Div ' 4 �= EL AL ILI jilt y�i ie t L=' 51{d a....x,a. ua.,- �� �,;r✓ — _ �a,� y�, .y�R A�t CQI�I Y'M*IT m 2) 'm�' a t� I � I ` - ,ic 13 A. got I T�v AAP N x7.:p U 0 I t t� 7L l ; -- s Con VI .44 1 ♦ try .'.E. ay :L� 1. IN ' r . 0Im clIt +—i ! ICA y Si i if Q 0 i d R � N V W Q z Lim U StaA $ � yO y S y< ��_ � l 33 N W CA tj CA All y yam: c e WO gl C_7 o = C LL ai G. o r L=_ z � I W Q. < g W yL bf - rl; /!VJ{ - 4 Y �Illllll�lllllli ame zoo � ]L 44 N k zt � A 4 r♦ y lz ��•". K 4�OOp G-�. eemo ♦ .}p'.4y . F }r { • L6L CS' • f pi t r°X �z-" A _ 1. :'L t l ♦ 4.C. _ \ t 1 `r r i�Ct Y] F !♦�r��I A k� - 'a e, str _ C , LW US. ar - z a ra n � } i 00 1 � 8` , ti a �x� 0701-0 o P G,. AGENDA AN ARY , 2 92 0'F 3 }i` F a F ��: 1 �x� 1` �� �. 1"�ll'� �r�llll a��i�. i ` " � - II��fE��� ����� � � � ; �'' '� � t T�K� �� �:t,���t "'fir ;�s f w:s ,�s � � � �.� _ , , a� �j x �� =-R ,I%��,�{ �; �_ �� a ,_,„ i �-_. <.•. � t t,� . 1 ,. '� i �_ co �: y � J.;- ,� i \� ���� � �._ � `_ '� k'.��- i, ���. �;: �-r;�, 3'`�, 'I y, r 4 ��u ��f� � _. 4, �� ��� ';�..�;.sK, ,,< N �` 'iG��'. `t � t r, �` 4� i � ��` � ly, C�. I_ .a f+ ai C1 i = rAz ^ ! o�� ,j/,ifs—� • P n a LJ. LA`S 5 1 of 0 O41 P a 9F t o o ¢o No UO G f �45- ,� ��" � r � 11 ,IIII) ���`� ,�''¢ �� ��Jlllllllinlll - �— �, . .�,�,. v :, .; -p ��� --- @ � }, -�' R-- ,��. �� ,fv L i�l _.Z :•,_ � �+•-���. �„- �, �� *- - �1c =K ����_ � t � � i �— i t�•� �� ,� I .. X� �� / �" �. �� � � �� / � M � '.:�! prime '�! �' vt � � ,. �� Lffl., �� a f�[:- �'. ^I i Willllf HIM IF iRi MR gg r Frti r II �• �'t-�1 i i �� 4r L llti:N' lp �v 7 1�y ;ial , :e .r � �{�# IVY � 'Ar�'� ^ F� t 's�.rv-':- � • 11 !' Wiz' fly. 40 cn ILI QLJ IMM H W -- i za j �111� * Zz it --- 0 a Ash RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 'fHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14875, A RESIDENT2.4L SUBDIVISION OF '36 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 3.56 hCRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND LHURCH STREET IN THE OFFICE/PROFESSIONA4 DISTRICT, A PROPOSED MEDIUM RESIDCNTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1077-332-26. A. Recitals. (i) Pitassi Dalmau Architects .has filed an .application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14875 aF described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 9th of January, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 9, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street with an Archibald Avenue street frontage of 250 feet and a Church Street frontage of 613 feet; (b) The property to the north and west of the subject site contains single family homes, the property to the east contains a single family home and condominium units, the property to the south contains apartments; and (c) The project, with recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the -City of Rancho Cucamonga; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU January 9, 1991 Page WA, The application contemplates the development of a 36 unit condominium complex, proposing a density of 10.11 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the proposed Medium Residential land use designation of the General. Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commissi-on ' during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set -Forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission 'hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a} The tentative tract will be consistent with the General Plan, Aevelopmenx Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,,-and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife, or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problem,:; and (f) The design of the tentative tract kill not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4, This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a mitigated Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: (1) Approval is granted contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 90-01B and Development- District Amendment 90-02, a change in density from Office/Professional to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). l PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIV.�,NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 PITASSI DALMAU January 9, 1991 Page 3 Aft -J (2) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits; whichever comes first, the applicant, shall consent to, or participate in;, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District 'pertaining to the project sie to provide in conjunction with the applicable School District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, i£ any School District has previously established such a Community Facilities ,District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of thefinal map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. If the developer and any affectec, school Ask districts reach a private agreement, this condition shall be seemed null and void. (3) A final acoustical analysis shall be required to identify necessary mitigation measures to redu;e the noise levels within the residences below 45 `CNEL. The report-shall be reviewed and approved by, the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. (4) A sound barrier as required b, the acoustical analysis, shall be installed adja;z_nt to the units fronting Archibald Avenue. The final design of the barrier shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation Plans subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (5) Landscaping along the east side of Archibald Avenue shall conform to the Archibald Avenue Beautification MastL Plan subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (6) Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions shall require regular cleaning of the clear sound attenuation barrier. The Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION;NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14876 - PITASSI DALMAU January 9, 1991 Page 4 Engineering Division- (1) An in-lieu fee as contribution to future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side o Church Street shall be paid to the City prior to recordation of the Final Map of issuance or building permits, whichever occurs first.. The fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the- portion of project^ frontage from the project easterly boundary to the terminus pole on the east side of Archibald Avenue. (2) Landscaping within "Limited Use Areas" for all project driveways shall be approved ,by the City Engineer, (3) The following drainage improveme6tts shall bt constructed per the project drainage report or at. otherwise required Ny the City Engineer as ji{stified by a final drainage report: a. A catch basin shall be construca,;d on the south side of Stafford Way adjacent to the existing detention basin. Also, a, connector pipe shall be installed between thEi catch basin and the outlet structure. b. The existing inletioutlet structure located in the detention basin shall be removed and upgraded. c. A six inch high concrete curb shall be constructed on the easterly right-of-way line of Archibald Avenue. 8. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, airman ATTEST: ---Yr-aT u er, ecretary Y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSI DALMAU January'9, 1991 Page 5 '+ AIL I, Brad Buller, Secreta ,y of the Planning'Commis,.�ion,wf the City, of Rancho' Cucamonga, do hereby certify that; the foregoing'Kesolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: ;AYES COMMISSIONERS: I NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 4 not o u•..y5:`t � ✓Y y L/ o .• GYY rn � 1!. d L L p7yn. V.ywYa Four fQ K.T O N Oiy�V Oq Y.O USOWV�y OC�pC u�ueg Y!6 wu�Yi�p79ai i�Ouu O6Ra0.. �CM NHS{.rJ NV =M aCY✓' wYG. a0'^q= yTy LYL.Op q !p+� pe w �ECd C�«Y.`'qtV O.i Opp YVF�A 6y.q4q Y:6Y NYps YM ON�1,1 C`�_s CW��q ���`6yyy�� �AA 4O4■.N1 -` .e tl W b M q Y✓C L i •Y =p m•= 9 0 4 w y lill.O.4 V q 7 C^t u;Yo �MY: �q C�nO Thy V g N' OCMY � y" Oy�.CyO Q•y VLp O1YayiG Y..•C t_ Q Y Y Y.ttr A N. Y.e O y V L gCi �.4 i M Y Y C 9VV 4 3qyy3iYYjLppgAO C� YySN SAP C� TYj� ^^O„ ry^YY Li.�Csya�iO�O�CCaC y>o�N � GN�YLN NbQ. qYr SLY qq n9 i�Y�nYLL<Oy 04DYVY q� Ry✓YD Y�44 '�� V tty.'°`^uai 9co. ^Y.c Yam'; n cy � MV pL. w. Qw^�c.. �M 1 4�V N.«✓4.O.A >C Ol Y V B Y O �4 �✓ � A N �'KIN %�■Q`✓AZ$ y.�Ly AY 6E C1 YC f.9 yM. YM G� �L i4N (��]LL�•". ^ Lnz: AG6 Vf.V. V.. •B ItS'� YY _Y NL���t .M�pAt C„ 4✓Oy^$} �✓,O M C OY•Y_ZS �Y�� MOS Y<.- pYa nCyS S"9 y OE w .`C Y^�[N Y c Y y. w Y .p Q G •G 03 ztu.cv$'owo ` a$> a u" a >cu .- cy u.- pa >-� a fYc1o✓ `�Yb GO7 M�.9j+ O 929 AOM 6Y l.N... 5 a4"O not 6L.6Ll. N «Y E A. sAwTin�A;� s=o n r''"a QaL cart'i W A9Y u Y pyuA'"Y✓CO YCY ial. Y! N y�'f� L YQ Y& �O✓Q�O e � dapp V3TN�'� „ � GL �a■YO;AYO y y Qgy 9 8 C1V� a � 1�✓ YC VNN j.YS O L:Ly.v CLC w LYp1 rs--= ~4~ F 1• s RY•LJ P 4 L. y'r�D�G�rG pW ti ems✓ 6 o i p�. � CYO«4N4yu AS �' gD$ c4btoP.:`o.+e aYaaaLooi; ae o`"o u $— N�N gy� aee$r 4 q•-� rS Ha,.'.. "� r�p.� Oa�q.p a' N a+ 'Y LS c3 Nam o 0p'a HaA A .-.a ` SI� Y CL— pLG 2 �. S ®^ `Y --pLn. n E _Rfiw TL e Lp O u N O L C .O®`q N K r M C^V c O CN� q�.L K � �sly06 -/o Ocd OMOY q^_�Oyy■Hy O, 9''010��(///.gYYH q'�L It 9nYM �w VO Yy VY W' LYIB'� YZ .Na�q Z�. 49 4...On.YfYCwCC9 y��A.p.Ya..Y N L O . NLC Vyge� yyO L NLOtb ^O q II d KK ^O!�Z i Y Y l 0 O g Q O C V p p M u w+ cy u .zn eI o •yc� s. v q u�.- Q,N�« 03 Na' pc s= Lea. Y^o ^� n _Y� «3 C t yq L^ O 4yY� aAi� O CLY L GOy •�� qY '� NZOO .Or.`. .Yy.�. Y �7' ~. O LM y.G jai: 1 1 Ip� A L w C $«Z •-gip. O v O C CL L Cy O. OLVCO' yVt YYY�.Ory L yfA�`pC.4 VOOM cQ'@ 1Y'~ � : owu^ N Yg1wdV w .G��.�]. Ca 01Q V. YL �Y OVCp� oC ' 8 O� lOt Vf �� 4E�p «��0�9 ,Lgag_Y =tee gg Yy Y�vOC ppL 7 N W yC%D ;-v BNC O C L d<�y Y1 O CY�dY ¢ Y� N� L�YNYI„t G �. Y.Mfn W.�r•E OC 44 q.Y� N6 G Li C CC B` ~I- CZ.n �4 «� Y n7.4 V L^ •+ O ^Y ( as �c� vY yYS Z' EZ .A.`� V'C~a. qJ Ft C`.O V S O O.�Od Y� c'^�p C$O �MgY <. ":•.. .a« ESE N6pQa YwS.L 21 a,=$ �OVV �ccNYL iiJw'Y' OL Cq a=�V �L1 v f-tYG is Y.O Ys 2.5 Y H Y w w ruy i o ^ Z O Y O O O y •i.l c 4 vi-Y C S wy z 0 n y eV N L Y Y N` 4 N w^Y ^ C O . 99c C aY YY4 V +pQQ 9 . W3V`6q..��N�'. 6��QOJ CHOOpYn1r Y�,opp`w q�SttlN q.■��rp1`^� OICnN NO YNN H.0 LgW q{LY. CLY-i4 Fv O4.^Y ■ ,YG c.Y.la 4w4 �C 6^ t H9 •.Cgs^ 1.gqY .�g LYy •�'a q�0.: yy T ny0y �C Y O 6p�0p.� N$cY CM V i��LO^LnM V`OwA LICYL �A3'i Lpyy dAJ i�,E�. Y 7w. O.a j��Y��Yyj rp� HCN cp$~?A y Oy NC C O 4 ■p 9 V C?Y C:O O LYp O O O..8 O C O ^ .. qH VnU tli9p OMCL CO yyY` �LG O C � �4 LG Y Z w{�Cla�lA O�UC9 p dY nC NY O'O <i�Ca ".L. �-C'.MO Q.�Mai w� �Y Jy Tj pY�ly.rii�• �.r'is NYL� �..wlo�. ..a o1Y 0 L.�CNC M M " LL YpA «oY 0Y LM L pN^� �C L C G 4 C > {1 •�N:s. S L^ 4 C G 0 n Y.- 9 JL-a�.. �Ya NN w Leo .yw C i N Vpp T 'L tl « "bW N U V.VYM^ Yy.CU � 4a N Y � V LSO 4Lq. Gam. Q�i G� „o y`MNIYN U1 V.y"j MC GC Y« Gtl 1�y« ' 9 q $ a'S Y o:a Lz. a ^T'cGc iM •OO n�PN1..0 eoy MMC y - +". 0M, Tuo p. .�$� i r G NL�•i1 L^GON Y.p YyrM`OyLyQ ory�n1n� C N�V e4 CY�� B.Y G N�G ntl tl G 6�.. T tJ' « L Z n 4 t`VF�1�V It Y4O L�OnV MC OINNT Ctl« tlU t' LSO M U C 91 a+ Y 014E 4 'Li t1� l u�4YNO n i:- i`. Neu YO19 nNu+oN «>, V o.. 4 «a. NL�pp 'Zn c.YL. ■w ■� .ts» Y."'L .-...� �i.-oo uyy .. �uyDOy�. �.� 10uv9 Nw qN. GN.- KN 2N0 HNi. <NY►r�TM.'p1yq DO <Ow.py iY Y.O�`I GN O i aY" are vc nc o YYc� e� T`o� nia e.w.1 L dCq. GG tr7 u. Yo.. +`-No L 0 N1 L 0, Y6+L O 6p� Gp L-' `ova. •� oYY � Y �4L« u3 ��� `«{#co S o Ya +e o L Cl t T 'a i yy � ^ Y Y � "$s` CC^NU'L' 4� = s L=N o R. Y N C. w^ 9> C Y Y V e 0 Cc NV cL L« N 4a Yu Y G tl1. 4NL Ca`M 'O - C C Oyp 'C 01''p tlnNY pNY�1 Y.� Y N OYa� n. yy UY4 Va 0 atlwC'=s pi Y �C6w L jw Ly �i L 703V �U�YVE . uv�IL L`�01 L4� Tp� 6L•1 tl L� `p zm og a1.e1 +;Ys nr«.� L C Y GC ��Y. 6N 7; N« 4�L> c$..',o <4�o aoN nN su wi �`ON...4 �t`oP►1 �Naw u8nI.IT.. r o W Dfra V w �i+ Y Y C G • Ica evga $Wuru $zR L'e'^L{oiyyyS. �$¢•. YV _, fir^ c Y as U $-i v3g SIT a. A�g..u$ CN�u* a�L• .�. y�� v� o 'Y�y, N.'".ini. o t".. t2Q« F Y �a na$�u `��...; 3 ou , .313 .3 a'ppcv ucwn�. '�rsc" Ti!{ ova o �'�ie w.+�«r Y ^ d JiY QCQ Vyi N C aC�5• ■� y NEE C. Vw ~pQ O yW Y��W Y Y�L i$U..�{{ p aYi gg y y L Y "a• cOGa "'i.C'Y.»,. :Y� GS` ■■Oppa'_ ors OtV�ap� � �Sw V L O 8 Y C'NN li N Yy p y ^CG N.A^ GYMt� �Ct ^Lyy`�` a+ e4 YS�aY M Y'. NY C i�0� L�a Yy S � �p•r `!�V 9'6-!e Ya. Vr Y NBY » YY VY& » CC $ P ^ JJI a�Y $.�.1syc»a.� O 0 p N C u Y `y Y 0.�Y f• d �L Cw F $a:va+ 1`0$ s'�1:. $ CI. 4`uW ' Fa oa o3S r.`��aL yr N �vs' Xzoo ;5.. t E— U L U a CT'L y V Y Y Y Y T� O V a —.4 LIE ». � Y u {r Y £R $$ a r e. • �2 n� t �,N,: $Z'a oKu WE w� lac g 2z lax C H LLW o Y �V++Y= C.O �$Y WE YY.W.YN Yr ' O r_N �.Fzi. M C c y YY - a .53 cL^. .LY.gsCM .2N! v� o+i. JZ A p.Y G A w (C. u �'C X&J`CCq■ ~ yy�� a7 O 0 M4 3 r' �a�=O. 7 ■ C LGy ~e `d`yyCLYP a Y Y Cam. $ Y� p Y. q•aY L yy C £C CC yy &B y y !!!!!! L b . ^ Y„C ' G: C CSC.AQ —.9 Ona Vr N_� Y uy �1uy y V{� 1� ,C xi= Oa.CY O C �� CO1 y Y�`� uQs''1. $Yy�.� Y 9»r N U N .n_.A V O� rL 4 A Y 6 p �:Y�. L C y Lpp Y Y S ■Lr `a r»a JL.�.�• K7aC..— Kp� Q{O/Nx' U W1L. bi�C' `VV a•.Y � Q ~I. v.� NI N � L • N 1�1 bU.o a.�« G:eiY NLO YC 4 a Y N N w 0 N' �01b O.O i r tl 2 q Y ■■aa V YCJ V �MCp d � Ta y.P sS��tw G 7. _ Y Ate- as hO'�1'�' G� uq.N�S Nw gC L L Cw O bw. iL„Y�Lg Q+L �~ wry f u CO�p Oa. 0.��. Y Y Io L N LC � POjS A a�■Cyp/L Y.r `Y � � CC�O rqq..Q yy. �O. OOI�6,w YAYY bL O C C V.i O L C�C Y N=V b� 9C� g p O « O C�'. ` G.C O•�� yCy O qq 4 y �N y= VG^tiwC yV O.cV� �■ � W YpY. .r Qn � M VC «�. N� �b tlOL11Q O�.O�C .. Y a u� b q P O L N^ w w Y O eP+ M M y N p G C 9 o� a_, a rf' a+.vL E {�('� P Lc litl.N. ^a Y� W m Y V S O Y Y O Off! N ;u Y O F� I C b N b i1 gg C W P� b0 �_ �9 C'L **pN•G1 �V > CG�W G� �N y9 ZN OC MlYi-p G O � a is W � roY Lr au A a«.Y. Lc Loa ..� y LOr C n 6 C� C s EVOCC y OyLP,� ao �j • .b.0 Ybb L b $ a �E.r c ��. �� u a. S«•Y�. d; ■pY, r �C Oat It. yq�wp aAANr at .O �= C''ee L G_r. V O. •O� It0. by V Y S Y Ab s w C C>> Y L v w b Y O a= =� •o X1D P �U�y Co 25 tiY. i'O aye�. b60 Oa■000. �.� N� .L Y O�`� w5 �� oq:Q4yyGq® NO N N 'UPI .CnPS= Ol w L 4 D O O C 9 ^C p O �pp 1pE cq6 O Y^ CC Y Y C a Y N pq Ayp C� 9 h e O w.♦♦i 4 Op C yOL $Q Y a bw 0�. Sb�L dU NQG� Yb O ^® LC:®IA y Syr C.V byyigig 3 N.L d�b �� Og. OCNn YY (��YC�O Vw �� « �Y VyAi GO.O iN �CYYCN F C OO YY VLby �Y•i9 WN WYU As JL' 8 WYs d®Ob-1 ON= Q 7O up abL `saarv. CC al a v to., cc < •...-."b c =e: o _ MTJyL M.W LPL _O N DONNM� O N w 9^y 9■app�> 9 - p L= V ■ Y py L p y ~..CP.Ly. i.Yy- iC E. �C Y.� jN «d O • GM YV b I P p•� C C>v 9 S�G•+ O^ 9 pf^ 6 p L - O y Y Y 6C YY 88 eYYO Y S q ^ by Ll4 `HC Y C+O.OV O CV q YN' F. L+ A M nO p w E L $^ P• Y S l\ aL s �F a q' GU\.O YL Pd C� C= -Y 1^ - 4 1p p L M L Y. ` rY- 0 yN w� upo«. M+ •^W M C C C �C Lp t y !.W�C OM ON.' �OI iYY®e�Y CyyLOW T� CN «qC O dP N e�Y V C�uutl bMOY.N LY LO. NW LM Y .pYY C� UCYL � Ww �L r.H �,O� 1+ ` �O•� 1i NO Gw. 6Ll Gw w`LL) G a O V C6 Oi. c w a N Ask i 2 p .: a,M v •' x.` ° 2 gy♦p' la d 'F V Ol y g ap t CL u C L E O C t = ^6 C a Q^Y S at a .� �tS a o;, �C•• O.O. O� C6 fWq P. .O G, GOV _.es uM L -Y +- Y2 yy Y -O O1Y CC O Npp :yY YNO aB.a�1 4u �O V� YO. y■C� H ?•Cs� O O. pW�Mpy Np 1.0 ■CC WIVE �O �� `LO bq a •� \ �s�tr.B.�. t{��. CVL�% �+ Yp`� ev « Y y[ L�•• q y� C Yf..f� eJ O1 •YY+ N. \•` /rl .+..y� C Ifs �O o L �4Z — V ^Y g.� J !ice �0 C.V 8 — Y L a o n o�Y i c^ woi ^N� dQ� Yy� �o { 1 - O — O L N pV V • C O V ♦�1 C a W p �, C.�C}—q� p' a R. y< 3'.81 » » 4Y Ti. _ Od �O yp V «' 4./ O ` C{NI Q LCq V Y � 9 u Yy .< w V •Y d UP C i l W y�y OT'L 'E p � �;�Y u A .�r Y L p A •p b C Y�9■JJ LC Yr L� O V O �+. <V yaagt» y04�'' .CY{Q �y■y�1w0 �yyM L ^cO. {�1y C 4+%L 60Yt «■." LYO�pp. L!: Q MO 0:4yy J,CV q{1 d�' VrM E_> 4YL�r6 A MO s RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONISA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 14875, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 36 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 3.56 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET IN THE OFFICEIPROFESSICNAL DISTRICT, A PROPOSED MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8•-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MAK?'.NG'FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1077-332-26. A. Reciials. _ 0— Pitassi Dalmau Architects has filed an application fnr the Design Review of Tract No. 14875 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On January 9, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior. `9 lne adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2, Bused upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on January 9, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows-, (a) That the proposed project will be consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design will be in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. l PLANNING 'COMMISSIOW RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14875 - PITASSY DALMAU January 9, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusion:; set forth in Paragraphs - ard 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, atto--hed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (1) All conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 14875 shall apply. J (2) Landscape and Irrigation Plan identifying all proposed landscape improvements shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (3) Interlocking pavers shall be used at the entry way and pedestrian connections. Material samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. (4) Design -of the perimeter walls, -retaining wails, and sound attenuation barriers shall be shown on the Landscape and Irrigation-Plsn subject tr, `City Planner review and approvva prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. I APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: - Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ,certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of .January 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: J a�V0.89y OM� .�.Lpyla �O AO�i� � LQ4 � 1 Y. L�NWOw CLYO �G. O.V Yq C� 4 O Y StyO YY d ORN O ,,CCLOpq OEe �. FV �M C O r�L ONw�� y'«"qO G4 p'O�M t�NO�M Y� a0��•y0. 'V= �U Tp.9�Tor YCC.jM=H CO4V� YO�dO YWC 6C4CQ O N 4CM'.L., M �Ee C Y�pd 90 e4Nr y . . y: dN O� w W ALu « �C 01�+ �e v c$eY^v o..•c�a 'crnao. qLo �gn b'v u�rw. 4�«aT+.'n �=arc.�a�s .y Y . g ��«. FOOv9p 3y.pAN T TL 4SU ?l ..6 4iA Yam.O.. Y.yG M .0 iC. nO. M AYO. NC LL 060. Oy O VL QyI y a2 c d c gg w w c N x � y os — o Fe oon ues s.«•�1.r3 fi `�.a- m €r o. a.0 I' ON�Y ■c Y G! aZEw UC aYa Lo at �.wpnp ya oc Y= So I 1 1 1 ) ,,33 ?6 60+ S i W u`�■8 u C OC�+aAi�inL u.�. CC �. � e .1 e� e " � �� ,gyp''■■@ y L= a= = W S U-F J • N In � yy"y■ DqqL W.YOW Y«.i Lfy Y. 9GGf� c dC Oa6i.. 9Y�Oyy04S V< 9A 0 ICY a Y up Y� a•O �NP C wu. Ls L N .LY� O. W � N V� 6YY0 V.C:d'.. GYnA CCCC'L O.y � YO Cy6-+9 q Ly '� q� 00 y.0 Vy rA'r Ny AO uy O� ~yy i"'AC YT'O. �NN y + LY ear cgm o oAD.N a.AN Yv « COL • C�y Wg0y�0^W.� _ 6N y. :lr u'O LNS PC ff 6L.N� YNtL L.s. A pA.M U. OC^VLU OV4L vLy�. GO N:q y I as �.G Y 4'^V qM'^ y o Aa n�1 ate. AHOA� .ay'OIp2 d�YLd L,C CV cV6 �'Cy 4 ^� N9 Y ALa 6G iL'j OL Py4p q.I D^ wy9 V G�.�Y9�.� qN 9'.L�O.C� GCW V4 0W4N a N p01 aacoc .'Lg yy �. �d o 'Q �u a A o Ngg o 'o 0 tidq MN a LY�q*L`y�PO. �O, � b y4 OLLG C= P �O dw9 boo OI _=C YY Gc d L NA CO W K. Taro �u�o� y�N��io 'S'ac 4 PL.a3 Eli pGV^yp4.+ yyu l�c4LLy OYNy CC.�i.6�y�N• G�Yo Yi.O. n V.TG it DO' A 4'1Lqq VliiS3 `yL�Ui�t 2yN G L401���=5 i.¢dL ^� OYp�:' v�M Y 9 L� Y N u d oao LLA T N i��e Onb V 0 c O N OVi O C L QOG11 C y e 4 L r�3-w N 6 Y� 4fur56 6 y y..N II fl N < CdyrGIY qp o - e (y +\INVI 4 Yf U �Y 011Xw. y5^jL C . prya< OU w� : Lt N CC VO. •pY.a ?P Gd. O DAMLry.LN OL.yo yu L^ y Ao Y ppyY p^4^y y ^� pGu LN WA GY G 4 pY�' dna Oc/R �o v �`� ooEye �^L. C c a uL0. V p p 3 4 G�.> lwyVi 4 G 'GLN N LP�>AC qYp� gp V C Y O� C C q-'O C {per.M Y Y k >A W a 6yV 6L r Ya'�'. Y� �� Ny Ala a^q� 'J Gun 01y ouM y YM N L� �O L. � p OyyC�[ O•q G L a L y V G C i! 0 0 G u Y s L 0 a y p I O y p i q W VN � 9L4 SV Sgg6 m VV qTp®I.'- N L� O�V 09 Y= AD �.O.G OdSv PC. Sa L.�GOF� y 01Q�S qp_ OM_ ^� .pAOO`^C'wCu a Yqq V t •-N La VqM YC Ip.�1L N:N GC� LO��00 N �C OS paaG Na 'L`o van aa4 a`.a'o >c.out �.e a.CgOA 9C6ay •nytc u^.+ vD .v N'�C 9y y�.c^yl �c all u p�cr uw oy C a C N y L O O _L V Oq E p N G b 9 O C?W a y■ G C O h O G p f y N A > .-, C d C O p O�� �Nr 6� Y V _ y9 yy D CC 0. �>q O O`t a tL N O� a L1 CL a� OWw?O U V O 'D qyC� O A.O� > 4 G O pC 4 LLipp��V^p 6 V O O O y t 9.pr6 ^Np 1•=L NCI <�Nd Nw% 6Y J VG:Y wy UI FyYNC a. H.C.A<6:L H Me �qu L4 $u. e� �rf v ��iudrr�o Ar W � 600. rn6 v. un =Tz= r aY� to {� . '^ cc R Ac ;Y w - !®v ' y Nao Y1 ov p.� c 4 f A..o Sy" o. colic oL'7�rN SN L Cw � a.m000 L rJ'=gc u a~ �m uL�n wnNpo 3.Y a aN s ^a �� OLg4 C G OV . dL � Fp4N yNw g6LJ•� A. � G � uMntN r Uq`WySX .� yqY M Ra icp,� cNrn re wcron or w.o u�Y ^�'�.' cy q.N.aN rV�L Y61 " S'A 601 .may. B aN Aq cccp Wp 9. O.Nq rq Vy�.W AUN PVC SGgp .CC o~C U 0 4 V r L 0•N p U O',O Or. C LMC MS NC` qV �` a�H06q Cw PY..�9 dw LWYf� i G M q G M Y O p w O�:.0 d Y L: y' E Nam.. ` 6N LL 4ZNM T GCC N Unr. Ll A w^C O N I7 q r 0 V U W.M. r O U d O..N O NN q eEp. OL OI� N.vv SMC GOC C,Oyq L6.� SNOO qL Uf C U 1\`rV\rH71�U Z 4 O . O.. ~ U G L O Y G WIM N� gMrSO q` q L O pp �C[L C BMX Cd w x OI t T .-L - 'I'. 4gLN 9NAI a4 eFe 4p�v EO 6`O. S=S C y O O.d OgiyGyP 2'2 rawq H LN-5 Z'. VE'o q 'C tau a4e o.� �nr N�GeN tN� 'r s no Hums :CN 8.2.2L`-ia rnw nuo a 9 fL.pm U. 4 q V d o a f U U e C .1.1 .Gow O. l A 4 Y va. vv. cr ccL '?! c ♦ems 'oo t 2t..yy ,/ a wok a:av"pf a.n r O E. L LL 6p G, G ` aG�ru4 4Cp O 9L4L r. C.,F D 4:L +I G• Qt a O y5w5. AV cH :L G4✓^ CY c � r_}p G ^ OG N. yf+ q q3 Ga.� Yw9y t o� n a a ` N qs ^Ae a CG.'ug'5o'�" EE q a O. V: y.G M V q'F �9NM 6NL�VC7: O. L LOO ^N LY �LCG 60 da pt� d ^m OG iC 1y yMU.e 4y � UO Ed'C �V . YL �qv^ sgMgM.4 `a r a� � ,,oo mg Y-s 0L` A or 3 G 01 t V Na n 0 LG L y N a.Y�oS.r ONO l-OLS6• 4 . G YC L p W N —GU M U 4 w G a 4 Y O N « O Y O t }Yw0 Lq;C RA G N O.p`f .501. p M n.� �IaOL w'U Lq GOC^. V j. 49�p q0 � GO^ q�'L GV Sd Y.=_z rG w��C dyyy G.nCj ' G O O O N C C r 4 N O y 4^ 4G .. q Y A >L. O C ra�Y Ot Gsbp U D.Cr Y' C>sCyI V�� �C 114 4MM0 `L�m i <ON HGN QV !VO NAG.O: 4GL QN.p! Wi G.3 ViN� t VI '1 d •1 l V �I \ � �� NI. � y ■ C V T LL tl�. o O O.. y VI NdN� qn0�,yy�1 Z.LN f V�Y P. TO,r d.O� SON 4N R CL ��• �%:N U60 YL M V�o� > r9C C� • m ry ISd q= p pCp> Ol�.s G� A'y Ll = q. N C Y.�rA. yL.M q'O Ol �+ m•. lO _��0. SWS �mm N DM K P C K^..q.L Ow ii� O N P ¢10 um" W o Y V �V 4 .tVy.C r• C�V 4 [V^qy 9 0� y �.O y C p0. �4 r>. c-d Y O d u—yi Wy OV rpN_.�r r p Cry++y r s' t9Pi of C� O.«W K�. Mu■�= < N■Y.q�- 4+�V �> �$v.�Y 'n uC V.r.®Cy Gm U.YT SCwLVF 4Cd � ti.N GO 'U L r R N d G O q J O.�'.Y w� ,8 'g O 4 N 1 Q �.: C 4 L V V a q60 'C' ! Y LeS N •V Y •+ —Ltl qt]o Fi 6ti 9=A IL -"Z � ,.O AYW1� i�FS�>LL'N 11�9o.0 N. vl O.UG. dsk q `ew.Y A c a�a P 26ykZ� L 4 NL yaY 4^{��•COS N— V 9C Vim+ �I sa OLL L C N.M O C t`LL�G ^6 9 GC � YN N 4.00� a _G t N 9aLlr� L� 44 QC CO. BOO. 4 �QY•+ �O^ ii.Y- r. 10M �C • V.:4.d� ,_ p i C�. ■. O �q N `C=+Y = LL Y p Dr b.L LNC N v iL 4p4w,. BC44 yy..�—O.. Opp %. E�Ca ytM�]yy' o .Cy O �V•.O 0 C4 O�4 S V c U ZZ NPr.OA A$ N 4 i a(C'• so AV r C■ O Y tz 4 p ^ v N s p O C 4 M e•+c e N Y.CO OC�Y Y Y>C+, �—M .>ic ca,ae c '_.v�cc P Vie. 8oa39 @@$ N. qN^ ^Nj0 Eauc d qW� eo+ ` > 4a �� "sum c� upo $$LY 4w V � CLCO 10.4.-.4 =cam_ Y:0419 Lr. a@� LO.b e^ V—O Gr f t6Z. 9 G G (Ft O Vr� — W1� 102 it 7 Is C* N.q>u 4 �yg C Noac Y Qyy Q C Y ^^ c JCM NVm`V6 b'Y. G N ^. M. r y�4'1 LN04 pY. CIM^ �, 4 w L9 Na L �'` OI9�0•G NY� 8 = w. p �O N = l V A w `M q O L Y O 4 C �5>,. a� W. 9 p s o o a._ u o G YC „qi�l G U` Y ` 4 0^gppp_N i a�Y y • = p i D l„^�i L s = WG� dM Cy6n pLYG �? O oL C O O N rye. g p� tkad n�T�li «.Dau.p,Y u as�. vq ,� Ntv cg pe Y oVH w p9 G w �. �yOp qA4. o «N q 11JJs 9 d ! 00=W 04 •`L+M 11C 2N Y Qi.s G.e O O W Y 4 e c SSdCY L 0��■ Pa •v CQ C§ -lz D .= �E n i O �yo�yey 4v 4f C 4N u M = YD' w..G Y aN C IL m Lp i9 8 MA C N ■w per^ Lp p A N Vp ^ 9 O 4S w w s$ 4o v" ^ia 4 CCp'r wv a. Nf_. y' ovsIL �QY�Qyy 4 V p V �q 4 ^t M V Y^ rN^�. t L=�pCC O v ^ N N C L >•M p Y o '� 'tea �� u vo� " Y+i oar aqq. C eE iqG' -e Y`'w f+ nT, a .riot= gN` �Ca Y a. N'D• d�"a o4. 4}!�pfh arJ Vwe^?, 5,i.o I C ap a^OH=oaFOG� YCOD$�.YN =O^O ^_ N ^« — ul 2-4 OL• 4cS.4^�c�uo++rwCs •-a q�d. uvvo `r�.aps 9w L' oy .rlv L.O , y�oa.. io p o wcnyS Sw"uT.�a v=o?L i5 ` yy F� u. - o m pia yd ' w4. D-i T9' Y Dm LO 4YC a.0 �Jw ^O a I Y G EyyN 4 CQCw , �L" aNI L Nq L9 w6 yy yy C�. 9 OiN •• O YO pC• =C V > 4aVq.N yy a,4 SS N 9W wy Lv ^>, OY 3 NY9Na. Qi`!VG C6wr■qq► 04 WN96 dY L9GY wG <{4 �2 Y6N COG 4N rcw w- a Y 000 o�Ly. �+�v�• rho. a oKca.� y !u, Tzz M+ O V��a O« YQ� « Nq �VC�Y � � C • O 4vN aN O N • L �. ecay sa Z- uu. \_ Ldl.0 NF • N O C O yy L~ C L0 spy V _M YY YE •V\_l CLOG O v G C.w.. � i V L y. c uu y` �V L cazw aco az 5 Luer'iw Nam 2� 4�W «c Na u«oaono.�. «c ^ si ao '.i o ia�a uu� L'W «ay. o�'mz:",r..ve� ' �« "c s od u �.riTs U-z pgg� CY Y� `> O•NiN C Y G L C ,,CCYYL �. .0 � O�wO.Y ^O 4 C.. 4L Y^ Y Y{IMp bOO OM NO 6i 6i.i �. LNL Ltd S96 UO 4� V' .C. NYW K.cN N O u U. A eau y O VY YtT M� Se � ^tyO-q Y GL �� N y6 CV � � •rA OCa `O« L _PO Er p. rc ea Loe r'V:5 Cn g a� a6N f N A W LY•S '.L ii�� NOC �Y. Z Y .z CC N� OQ' L C Cp Y y o w g. YY aY CW^ate ' ao �: Gg pp L Q CC �yp0 5 c oe V 7. �r ^yCy iY160 OY � .� �Y G.oY aN:Y�Y eH ^QSuz O C pO�y ►�O �`^ O� W. 9 s CO qa•{Y� 6iL)l^�e a±L N4C NV jV Y « f�'1 \ a aL O'L 9 O ONE qy 3CL o^W LC V+ ti;3 YY� ` O S �C O` Wl .9% Q.L (�.1 it M ��Yy \vI T \1[yYI V OC C G p u Y Jran• �S � Na Lcr !10 Cy� Y a+a W s^ c= va W L D Y� Ya'a YCCijuy d«Z K.40 SOrJ O C^OL �CL Yp �FM C M K C� OY M Y „ C 44 n4i M L O t C Y ZO �~ M S 9..dr y C • O M M V�:� Y' S V CyHO N` � Y N V C tt �4M W a00. V Y.YM Y y CCw.N �.L �•O Np.L+L L�MQ NNN Y y.YS pp Y' V.Y �Wq �O p MY s` v Lo � ve Xo M �S yv .tn>irJ' w �wa `u o Dn= .cp �:«n sdyua ca. ^, TZ �. aL oDy a� �. c�VD cb V ^Dq V� Y 9t• MY MD i4 4J CC 'Yw. NON D• Hia^ 4 y` .L ` 00 O 6Y VY y�H N'�u VYCd is }g('. `G �Y OG.� ra .- v C =.r7 4 4 H.•. �.. prs Y O D O t 0. KE �. .4..N �.� 't> f-w 6.GDlL i01�. r HL �i � i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 9, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-39 - GHASSAN WMIS The request to establish a convenience market and deli within the existing Archibald Auto Center in a leasEd space of 1,997 square feet or, 3.22 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan,located at 8880 Archibald Avenue`APN: 209-032-42. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approvrl of a non-construction Conditional Use Permit to allow a convenience market and deli use within the Archibald Auto Center. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Project Site - E,isting light automotive repair complex Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 3 North - Retail; Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 3 South - Resdential; Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 3 East - Re-,. - Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 4 West - Manufacturing. Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 3 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site General Industrial North - General industrial South General Industrial East - General Industrial and Low Residential West - General Industrial D. Parking Calculations: See Exhibit I'D" II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Mr. Ghas an W is i r s an s proposing to occupy 1,997 square feet within the Archibald Auto Center located at 8880 Archibald Avenue. The Archibald Auto Center is comprised of r` five buildings totaling 33,238 square feet (see Exhibit "A"). Approximately 5,935 square feet of this project was allocated for eating and drinking establishments. 1 ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-39 - GHASSAN WANIS January 9, 1991 Page 2 The applicant is proposing to operate a mini-market and deli facility. No interior seating will be provided. The proposed hours of operation are 7:00 a.m, to 11:00..p,.m., Monday through Thursday, 7:0-1 a.m. to 12 00 p.m., Friday and Saturday, and 8:00 a.m. to-10`:00 p.m. on Sundays. The maximum number of employees will not exceed two. a. Issues: The Primary issues related to locating this use within the automotive and light truck repair center are compatibility and parking. A variety of automotive and light truck repair businesses have located within the center - Precision Tune, 43ig 0 Tires and Performance Auto Care. In addition, a Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit was recently approved to permit a donut shoo to locate within the center. Staff anticipates no compatibility problems with other tenants and the;;,propused use. Parking: The required amot-mt of parking for this proposed use is 8 parking spaces. Th:,_".',)nvenience market is parked at the ratio of 1 parking space per 250 square feet. The proposed use is primarily a retail use with ancillary food and beverage Adak sales for off-site consumption. The total amount of parking required for both -urrent and future Users is 124 spaces. The total amount of siVices provided is 146. Therefore, staff anticipates no parking problems for this proposed use. Sheriff's Department end the foothill Fire Protection, District: Both the Sheriff's Department and the Foothill Fire Protection district have been notified of the proposed use. The Sheriff's Department has expressed no concern over the proposal. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District will require plan check prior to occupancy. 111. FACTS FOR FIND?NGS: The Commission must make all of the following findings in order to approve this application: 1. That the proposed vs: is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives rf the Development Cods and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located, 2. That the prnnosed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in she vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ,REPC1T CUP 90-39 - GHASSAN IiANIS January 9, 1991 Pa{;2 3 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the appl-icable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This itrA has been advertised as a public hearing i:n the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper,, :C`,e property has: been posted, and notices were sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of tt+­'project. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approv Conditional Use Permit 90-39 through adoption of the attac eA Resolution of Approval,. 1 spect�ul submitted, Brad ller City Planner BB:Al:j Attachments: Exhibit "A" - S-i.te Plan C Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan i Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit Parking Calculations Exhihi; "' " - Sheriff's Department Letter Exhibit "'P - Foothill Fire Protection District Letter Resolution of Approval d.r y� -= I ITT zs tj 4 � 71 - �o 0 N � � Via: i f 1 1 7St/3 �a3 a Y-0 C,-?, ,,., n n ,-, a m-r,n w ., � :.t�•^ F J ; uO>30 NA1 J2�Vag a6_57-, 44, 93�;5 f GAATin(G' DEI�ART�ENT C;Ty oi= RAti1cp0 C'.Eed4MVA)OA . ro wYo,vJ 1 i MA y Ce�/CER H� /�c RpOSE of r"s �'�=Tr'ER s o RC9uES i A CdN7;I:oNAL LLS:` �oEkNli' GQR A /✓IiNi /hA2KF>. A�1D As RE4?u;,2tf) td Sw8f9R�A` 63, dF NE �j Des I Rr Az- 51��C�%=r'C 121-A41 f,4,�i5 -5,gt7O a/i/-I RRaDuCE S_AA)D4J, N,ES 9N SST yooO AAJID g,55R ;4ht;D wi4i,5, gRoC5pies C;oA6F7T7e-s, eoc`r DR,'JK, c'?e. OcaR FIa Rs o/��',4117on1 ce-SR f. eS Z:'A FR FDA Y A r t3 SA�(� 61 y 7 su,v ;o Am _ la ao y 8; ao AM t'14VM Nu�f13E� aF �tJ�%1PL� EE5 Y AT An/Y aN !!ME TS' r3u7" X,Jr`TElD Tu C'Eie� Two .�IaoccLt� ypce ,VfiF Anl� f A 2)->; T IoNA L.. 1 AI COR 1qA 7OAJ �L�ASr LET ME K�✓duJ n r fjo I i!poop; 1'1 iW'j C'NASSA�✓ 6dANi S Parking Calculations i Number of Number of Type Square a yp ua a Parkin Spaces Spaces 4 9 P p of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Proposed Convenience 1,997; 1250 -` 8 8 Marke t and Deli Existing Tenants: Precision Tune Automotive/Truck Repair 3,170 5 bays x 10 10 2 bays Big 0 Tires/General Tires Automotive/Truck Repair 4,500 a bays x 12 12AOL ' 2baYs . Mad Natter Muffler 2,800 4 bays x 8 8 Automotive/Truck 2 bays Repair Performance Auto Care 2,635 4 bays x 8 $ 2 bays Y Proposed Donut Shop 752 1/75 10 10 Fast Food Sales Vacant I Eating & Drinking 3,166 1/100 32 32 establishments Automotive/Truck 14,198 18 bays x 36 36 Repair 2 bays TOTAL 124 146 EXHIBIT'"D" CITY OF RANCHO CLTCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: �-1K►yw.-�1Soo�i,, i��st�wodst�...� \. FROM: vl ane; SUBJECT: Awo XIAVL= .va Q�.���awt3 e,1�9rP /Tslt 1®lCoe�4awl , caret .06 A 4aJ'. P MY 1: I� 7 TOti A ycL ?� n t1 lnnci t wS F l G �,G( &Lv1 �! SUBJECT I Ma• _41� ,0 �— (� l DATE MESIBA®Ee- ((�. L Q ,�1 0 A -G�.. z,.A_0 ! ',1 ,I�. CLA�.T sL( I- ('%,Aoa4 4,1 �( t SIGNED REPLY IMI a s SIGNED DATE RMFOM_4S 472 SEN®.FARTSV ANa 3INTACr esesbEseeEs s F JJLY P`4K t$O SETS)'lPAY2 PART 3 WILL RE•RETURNED WITH REPLY. rri RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING 'COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAC ALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-39'FOR A CONVENIENCE MARKET AND DELI IN A LEASED SPACE OF 1,997 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE EXISTINu ARCHIBALD AUTO CENTER LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 3: OF-'THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS !W-SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 209-032-42. A. Recitals. (i) Ghassan Wanis has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 90-39 as described in., the title of this Resolution. Hereinifter -in this Resolution, the su;Ject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 9th day of January, '1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. Aft (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. '-solution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Con.,nission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts , set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. , 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on .January 9, 1991, including writte,i and oral staff reports, together with -public testimony, this .Commission herel)y specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 8880 Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of 464.03 feet and lot depth,of 304.26 feet and is presently improved with five industrial buildings for automotivp,, and light truck repair; and (b) The site was approved for approximately 52935 square feet of eating and drinking establishments under Development Review 88-14; and (c) The property to the north of the subject site is developed !`= with a retail facility, the property to the south of that site consists of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), the property to the east isretail PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CUP 90-39 - GHASSAN WANIS Rl,'*-,, January 9, 1391 Page 2 (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 4), and the property to :the west it manufacturing, (Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 3)', (d) The application contemplates operation of a 1,997 square 1 foot convenience market and deli shop from 7:00 a.m.. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday; 7-,40 a.m '- 12:00 p.m. Fridays and_Saturday; and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Sundays. (e) The applicant will sell small personal convenience items and deli foods for off-site consumption. (f) The maximum number of employees at% y given ti�+e will not exceed two. (g) A dotal of 124 parking spaces is required, whereas, 146 J spaces are available-uh-site. J� 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission. during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific-findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby ;finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the, Development Code, and the purposes of the district in op which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable ;provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project,has been' determined to be categorically exempt i, ',n with the Call '`nia Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5.'- Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 'y- above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all C other City Ordinances. 2) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including, but m t. limited to noise, the Conditional Use Permit shall -.J;',e brought before the Planning Commission for i,ie consideration and possible termination of the use. I 1 , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION_ CUP 90-39 - PGHASSAN WANIS January 9, 1991 Page 3 Alft qW 3) Occupancy of the facility"shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamor.9a,-,Fire Protection District to show compliance. The Wilding-shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and any Uniform Sign Program for the complex and shall require review and approval by__the Planning Division prier to installation, = 5) No interior seating is allowed. 6) This Corditional Use Permit is approved for a maximum of two employees at any given time. 7) Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday; 7:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., Friday and Saturday; and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Sunday. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM014GA BY: `- Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of Jand.ry 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AlIkk STAFF REPORT DATE: January 9, 1991 1Y) , TO: Chairman & Members of -the Planning Commission FROM: Paul A. Rougeau, Acting neputy City Engineer BY: Alex S. Vicencio, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and General Plan Ameindment 91-018 City of Ranchr Cucamonga. P; request to amend the Circulation Play, of tra Generral Plan to delete the collector status o7 Banyan Street between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue. I. LOCATION The siudy rea is between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue along Banyan Street. The land usage is primarily residential along its , length. Exhibit A shows the study area. II. BACKGROUND/ANALYSTS: Banyan Street presently connects from the west City 'limits thru to Archibald Avenue and functions as a collector street. It functions as a local residential street between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue due to discontinuity caused by abrupt changes in direction and lack of a bridge over Alta Loma Channel. From.Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue it does, or shortly will, :`:unction as a collector. On figure III-3 of the Circulation Plan of the General Plan Banyan Street is classified: ,as a collector street from the west City limits thru Milliken Avenue, see Exhibit B. A collector street designation on Banyan Street between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue is inappropriate because of the large number of small lots directly fronting on the street. In addition, the existing geometry of the street innediately east of Archibald Avenue is not adequate for a collector street. Exhibit C shows these conditions. Rancho Cucamonga's Traffic Model shows that the traffic volumes between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue for the year 2010 on a continuous Banyan Street would range from 3000 to 7000 cars per day, an undesireable level for a street of this type. If the street pattern remains as it is, I the volume between Hermosa ,venue and Haven Avenue could reach 5000 per V'ay, but between Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue it would reflect unly neighborhood traffic. The future traffic which would otherwise use a ontinuous Banyan street, can be absorbed on nearby arterial and collector streets, such as Wilson Avenue and 19th Street, without f ITEM F i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT b GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/BANYAN BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND HAVEN AVENUES riAGE 2 significant changes to the volumes on those streets. Similarly, Banyan Street is not a critical cross-City route because of the parallel such routes which are available. III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: In conjunction with the application, an initial study/preliminary environmental assessment, in conformance with the requirements. of the California Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared. The proposal would have no significant impact on the environment and issuan(e of a Negative Declaration is recommended. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: If the Coi ,;ission should determine that the amendment is consistent with the circulation goals of the General Plan, the following findings may be made: a) The amendment does not conflict with the circulation policies of 'the General Plan; and b.) The amendment promotes the goal of General Ilan.-, and is compatible with the surrounding area; and c.) The amendment would not b:..tateriaily injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant imp::^t on t>7e Environment of the surrounding properties. V. CGRRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland V`alle4 Daily Bulletin newspaper and nrtices sent directly to all affected` 1. , property owners in the area. VI. ECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends public hearing discussion of the proposed General Plan Amendment. If the Planning Commission agrees with ths, above analysis and facts for finding, the Planning Commission may adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 91-01B to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, PAR:ASV-ly Attachments � UI Z ..u. i 1 y: W (w7 Wu 19 _O. Z 11 oy W LU W w �W J 5 W m F-3 ¢ u� ¢ U w m q w w Z =1 3r w (nmto a c a z c~.) a 'iLuaU.wC ?a °vicnN W 9L V W1000w r_ } � cc i ul V- � j t 1 [ I! } iu • M ....PF.... � • , 1 1 .mow...... , tllu!'.I.e• '1 _ c - - •. } } Al 1 1 —1 4.a.�f�I f• �� t1 ' g i i z w cw w iry a = 3z �. ¢ 1 a z I a:Iu �,zw 02l_ m v z — ¢ ._ a a G a wyew �wmc � Op a:ups 0, uI t2 m�►.. :4? F� am. W i G to U UCIO 0 W. w U x Q PC: VW z ac cc¢ uj a. u. try ?a Icn u�((u) p Q �rullu•o4bo i N i � I { . t s 1 t � I 1 i + I.tY1.WY � 1 � sa+Y •i� y I. r �l t ° +nve..f , a T� ----- Prn-n - s _` CLII � - - � - AY M D I m vsomil LU �� • l faro q 9Ap O N l C-1-7- HAY OIYUiN7U rEY 1'T1 m �� IUJ i- T _ —i �—�—i� W� n CAo O At RE W APPLICATION ao IAIa STUDY PART I Im EENERAL For all projects requiring enviror.Mntal review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Comittee through the department where the project a;,plication is .wade. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part 11 of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Coc,�nission will make one of three detevinint-tions: (I) The, project will have no significant environmental impa.t and a Negati,ie Aeclarat.ion will be filed, (2) The project wily, Wave a significant !avironmental im . and an Environmental Impact Report will ba"preonvA, or (3) An addit%-m4l information report sh^uld be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: 21, }�,gv Project Title: CiOPL�rJ �riEt�MiJT �i -o�B Applicant's dame, Address, Tetephone; C1T a A, Cpo LIGONja�f-�A ,loyop CIVIC GE1..,�F 1\/F K gCWC& O a Gta. G!''3aG J Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Conrcrr,{ng this Project:_&—uL e.. RoLiCr=Ad, A4rit -- o-f urY cIT�!Eti��I�le 1= GiTYOF Irk: lc o �laGd}.'I �A IOSDO GiJic: 'EMIT DR��IE Ras�c Ct1cA o�(Ga CA:gs73u Location of Project: Gam! OF Ju CJc.�,l r`,,� ���18t+LD A�E�Iu QI.JD �bV 1 d✓i<f.�Ll�. —r--- ---•--� Assessor's Pvcnl• qo•, _ Ze.I List other pdrieftt —i,.Qessary from local, FrRJiAnals state and federal agencies and t1ie agency issuing such parmits:, No F_ ' AOL -J - EI.Q ECTMSCRIPTTON Proposed u.4 or proposed project:_ ��p M tJ1'a� dss�ssME►.IT��It� �l �y FL-A AMP--t C)MEtjf To DELFS 15 CvLLEGTaI� s a�Us a= aa�l�aJ sr Acreage o,f rofez:t area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: /A Describe the enviromenectal settingof the project site including information on topography, sol1—sta ti_, LY, PRts (trees, land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspect , land use of surroundie<l properties, and the description of any existing structures and their Ise (attach necessary sheets): iJ/b f I the Project part actions, a 1ar9sr protect, ant of a series p}' a anulative tions, ehirh alt40ugJ individually small, mfy as a whole Have significant envirenmental 1M34Ct 1v//a Aft WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ,pound contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? _✓. 3. Create a substantial change in do and for municipal services (police, fire, water, savage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or General Plan designations? S. Remove any existing trees? How many? V 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially huzardaus materials such as toxic substances, ✓ flamnables or explosives! Explanation of any, YES 'answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): ���'L FLlif.� GIIZGJidTiDF.� EI-EM�f.)I'-G�—C� I� r`_G2.uC=s-r" 7. Estimate the amount of sepoagge and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: hii S. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project: N/A 9. Estimate the mount of gradin (cutting and filling) required for this protect, in cubic yards: I 10. If the project invol�es the construction of residential units, complete I the fors on the next page. CERTIFTUITEN: I hereby cerOfy that the statements furnished above }nd in the attac;u exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understbad that additional information may be required to bee submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made b the Planning Division. Oats:• 42-2�5 Signature Of cw� QUL A,. Title �Ti�g- DaPyrf ctN i=iJtxi�l Erz F-Y "Yt / C \./ Adhk RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION' The `.ollowing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid_ the school district in assessing their abiIit,. to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are required to secure letters _from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Pro4ct: v - PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3, PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single_ family units: 2. Number of multiple family units:- ti 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model# and 6 of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price �s®v ; t CITY OP IWICHO CMA.YONGA PART II INITIAL STUDY' a ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: DE.G�M = 27, 9�t7 APPLICANT: GIT�'ot FILING DATE: LOG MMER PROJECT:2 -91-0113 A.615�0t✓el:r 70 PROJECT LOCATION:-56jqAd -SMEW-r ,vFa� &9J1a&0 I. ENVIROSMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO AML 1. Soils and Geolo . Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c. Change in toppgraphy or ground surface contour intatvals? d. The destviction, Covering or =dification of any unique geologic or physical features? a e. Any potential increase in wind or teeter erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? ` 1 Z. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthauxkes, landslidss, mud- slides: ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use oe any mineral resource? 2. Hydrolo¢p. Will the proposal ave significant results in: YES a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? \/ b. changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface crater runoff? c. Alterations to thi course or flow of flood waters? I d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface',`vaters, or any �- alteration of surface %;V�7 quality? _ f. Alteration of groundwater; characteristics? g. Change in the quantity of groundvaters, either through direct additions or'with- drawals. or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? r/ h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? t i. Exposure of people or ;property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? S.ationary sources? b. Hatericrat£da•of ambient air quality acre/or interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? e. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture ✓ or temperature? b. Biota Flora. Will the proposal -have significant resul:s in: f i a. ChangLr in the character:,sticz of species, including diversity, 4',e'triouton, or number of any species of plaats? b. Reduction of the numbers of any,unique, rare or endangered sp es of plants? YES 4aYBz `p c. Introduction of new or disr;pti., fpecins of plants into an area? e _ d. Reductioh in. the potential for agricultural p?oduction? ._ Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals'. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, tars or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptiva species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or mov---tat of &rids? _ s d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habLtat? — -5. Population. Will tha proposal have significant results in: a. Will thr, proposal-alter the location, distri- bution, density. diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? — b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for-addirional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors. Will the Proposal have significanc,results in: a. ,Change is local or regional socio®aCononic characteristics, including economic tit coumareial diversity, tax rate, and property values? 1 b., U111 project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers* tax payers or project users? 7. Land Use tnd Plannint Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A<substantial alteration of the present of planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives. pclicies, or adopted plans of any governmentalAOL f entities? _ c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non-corsvmptive recreaeional 10 tunitieo? i ?�5�. 8, Transoortation, Will the propo results a• sal have significant f -- a. Generati4;,`of substantial additional vehicular movement? b, Effe-ts on existi:Ig streets, or demand for nev street construction? ✓ o. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for nncf parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing tronsporta- j tion systems? v, e. Alterations to present patterns Gf circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods?o0 ? g f. Alterations to or effects on present and -- potential water-borne, rail.' Mass transit or sir traffic? S. Increases in;traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural Resource Will the proposal have + sgni.icant = sults in: a. A disturbana to the integrity of archaeological„ Paleontological, and/or historical resources? 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will theproposal hate si— gaif—rant results In: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? . b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? ✓ c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous I substances is the event of an accident? ✓r 1 d. An increase in the number of individuals e or species of vector or parhenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? a ,/ flu f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous ` noise levels? g- n,! creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare?, YES m_va- `o 11. aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstructiOn or degradation of any scenic vista or view? ✓ b. Ths. creation of as aesthetically offs sive site? ✓ c. A conflict with the objective of desigrated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to she following: a. EZactric power? _✓/ b. Natural or packaged gas? V_ C. Communications systems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? i- £. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? I. Police protection? j. Schools? r/ k. Parks or other rmrreational facil#ties? 1. Maintenance of priolic facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? a. Other governmental services? .� 13. EnRrty and Scarce Resources. Will tha proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial Increase in demand upon existing sources of energy. C. An increVf4n the demand for development of new sources of energy? ✓er d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non-renewable forms of_energy, when feasible Y_S ."'AYB- NO e. Substaatial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14. Handatory Findinsts of Significance. a. Does the rrrject have the potential to de'grad'") the quaiity, the environment, substsntiall reduce the 'i.,_Atat of fish or wildlife species, rause.a fish or,wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant',ir animal community, reduce thanumber or rest;sct the range of a rare or ev.gangnred plant or animal or eliminate i portant examples af` he major pRriods of California.tistory or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieves short-term, to the disadvantage of lone-term, A environmental goals? (A short-term mpaet``zg;ene environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- tenz impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the, project have impacts which are irAlvidually limited, but cumulatively' ccns�derable? (Cumulatively considerable means that mhe incremental effects of zn ,nd %idual project ere considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, and probable fixture projects). r; d. Does the project have 4nvironmencal effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? IL. DISC;;SSION OF r.M'tONIL:TPAL EVA7.UATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the above questions,`plug a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). a Roge 7 ;l III. DETERMINATIOR On the basis of this initial evaluaiton: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on L= the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. DI find that although the proposed project could have a significant . effect on the,environment, ;there will not be a significant effect in this case' because thg% mitigation measure- described on an attached sheet have been`,._added to the pr A;Ect. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. - I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required I find the proposed project CATEGORICALLY (EXEMPT per Article , Class Section of the California nvironmental Qua ity Act. Date 7 A-l'a O --- l gn atoms— Arldc+ VfFP�C-e—V 5-:41o��. Tith i RESOLUTION NO. R RESOLUTION OF THE PLR"KING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIF ,CIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OFF ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT i ,'GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-018, REQUESTIFiu T6-AMEND' THt-CIRCULATION PLAN OF THE GENERAL PLAN, TO DELETE COLLECTOR STATUS OF BANYAN STREET BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan, Amendment No. 91-018 as dbccribed in the title of thi- Resolution. 'Hereinafter in this Resolutia+, the subject General Phan Amendment is referred to as "The Application". (ii) On January 9, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public .rearing on the application. (iii) Ai) legal prerequi,ites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. I LICW, THEREFORE, it is hereby` determined and resolved by the PTanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 1. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 9, 1991, including,, written and oral staff reports, together with publi., testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) Banyan Street is designated as a collector street in the General Plan, but only functions as a local residential between Haven Avenue and Archibald Avenue. b) The present function of Banyan, Street between Haven Avenue and Archibald Avenue is local and is not pocsfbie to be upgraded to ceilector status due to front-on residential property and the existing geometry of th@'street. c) The property along Banyan Street between Haven Avenue t.nd 1, Archibald Avenue is primary residential along its length. t ' I l Ff PLANNING, COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ENVIRONMENT A`'SESSMStiT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01B JANUARY 9, 19,91 PAGE 2 d) This Amendment does not conflict with the land use policies of the General Plan and will 'provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan<and with related development; and e) This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan; and, f) This; Amendment would not 1'e materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant imp&,;°t on the envirnment nor the surrounding properties, 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hea ing ynd upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraph 1 and 2 above, this. Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The Amendment prGnotes the goals of the circulation element of the General Plan;'and b) The, proposed Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan; and c) The amendment does net conflIC, with the circulation policies of th•a General Plan; :snld 0 The Amendment would not be materially,;,)-urious or det.'i,mental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the r�oject haz,been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California"En.3ronmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Commission recownends- the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council.- 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions skit forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, the Planning Commission of the Ci}y of Rancho Cucaaienga hereby recommends' approval of the Etitoenda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-010 on-:the 9th day of January, 1991., 6. The Secretary to the Commission shall certify to the at�opt3on of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ' ENVIRMO NT ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-018 JANUARY 9, 1991 PAGE 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TU DAY OF JANUARY,^1591: PLANNING GOMMISSIrN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONSA. By: Larry T. MqNiel, airman Attest: grad u er, ecretary I, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Planning Cc, nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ;do hereby certify, that the: 1'orejuing Res,glution V4s duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted-by the Planning I C.amission. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: at a regular meeting of the P1ann.ng Commission held on the 9th day of January, 1991 by the collowing votE.r,o•-Nit; AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners; ABSENT: Commissioners: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f r r:."E: January 9, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY; Jerry.Guarraci'no, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: , ENVIRONMiE;NTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT _REVIEW 89-28 - SNOJK SU'.QING SYSTEMS. INC. - The expansion of an existing ,a3nufacturing facility totaling 36,00,1 square feet oir ;.4 acres 'of land 'n the General I:naustrial District (Subarea 5') of the Industrial Areo Specific Piarn. located at 9310 6th Street - APM: 209-211-19. Associated t Tree Removal Permit No. 90-22.' I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re ufisted: Approval of the Site Plan, Building Eievatians, Conceptua'i Grading ?lar, Landscape Plan, Tree Removal 1,4rmit and Issuance of a Negative %�c?aration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North = Industrial Park and vacant land; industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 5) South = Industrial Nark; Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 4) and Varehouse/Distribution; Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 5) Eas= Railroad Spur and Recycling Center; Inddstrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 5) West - Industrial Park, Industrial Area Specific Plan -(Subarea 4) C. General P1ar. Uesianations: Project Site - General Industrial t North General Industrial South - General'3ndustrial East Genera, Industrial West Ceneral Industrial 0. Site Characteristics: the 9.4y acFe site contwIns an existing 32,750 square foot manufacturino- fit•, °a ;:reject site slopes gently +o the southwest 1'tr-_. Sth Street. "3veral matur, ve trees line the = 'stage. A large outdoor rz,,iioyee eating area :s of the existing building and contains tables, carbeque grills, trees and hedgerow screem. ITEM G PLANNING COP71ISSIOM STAFF REPORT :> DR 89-28 SHOOK BUILDI4G SYSTEMS, INC, JANUARY 9, 1991 Page 2 E. Parking Caicula"lons: Number' aF, Number--of Type Square Parkingknaces Spaces of Use Foe age RatiL Regu rad Provided E;,isting Office 4,500 11. 50 18 is New Office 1,025 1/250 4 4 Ex4sting Warehouse 28,200 1/500 56 56 New Warehouse 36,000 %/500 72 72 Excess Parkislg 0 0 Total Parking i50 158 II ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting aporc;val to add approximately 37,000 squitre .feet of space to an existing industrial building on the eastern half of the site. Improvements to the western ha�:f of the site include: the widening of 6th Street, new curbs, gutterc,, ;1?_�walks and parkway landscaping along the entire 6th Street frawrtag_ raising the hei�iht of the parapet wall «) screen the existing barrel roof and exNose0- --^of mounted equipment, subFtan'isl increases i:t landscape are-" - new employee plaza, the closing oi` two dock-high doors"-acing 6th Street_, and the construction of a temporary,on-site retention basin. Access to the site is 'via two drive approaches on 6th Street. The easterly drive approach ,has been designed 'o provide shared. access to the undeveloped ppetion of the site upon Fulture development. A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Ccmmittee (McNiel, Melcher, Coleman,) reviewed this project on Novembur 29,'1990 The Committee recommended approval of the project with th- followi,ig conditions: 1. Provide a landscape screen/?tIgerow on the west and sor,,th sides of the temporary 'on-site retention basin (see Exhibit "D"). 2. Reduce the oversized trash enclosure and provide ` a eontinuor-t planter to screen said nclosure (see Eyhibits RB11 and "D"). 3. The ;;rash enclosure should have m overhead lattice cover to contain blowing trash. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPhRT DR 89-28 - SHOOK BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. JANUARF 9, 1991 AOL Page 3 4, The new 40-foot stack should have a smooth finish and be painted to match the building (see Exhibit "E") The underside of the parap-A extens on should be firished to match the building by .returning the bottom of the parapet extension back toward the existing wall, leaving a small gap for drainage adjacent to the building (see Exhibit "E"), B. Tree Removal Permit: Pursiant to Ordinance No. 276, pertaining, to the preservation of trees on private property, an arborist's report was prepared to evaluate Ae health and structure of the f teen horitage trees now oh the site. All of the fi:+teen treeq surveyed must be transplanted or replaced. The report recommended the transplanting of the Olive trees along the front of the site (Nos. 1-7) in addition to a Mexican fan palm and two Sycamores (Nos. 9, 10 and 13), us shown in Exhibit "F" - The remaining trees should be removed and replaced with the largest nursery grown stock available. The project will be conditioned to comply with tnz findings of the arborist's report. C. Technical Review'> Commi °tee` On November '9, 1990, the Committee reviewed the f;•oject and determined Oat, with the recommended standard conditions of approval, ,`e project is consistent with all applicable standards and ev, inances. The Grading Committee conceptually approved the ,roject at its meetirq on November 18, 1990. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been comPlLted by the applicant. Staff has completed Part "I of the Environmental Checklist and found nv significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with staff findings, then •:3suance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Geoeval Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The project will not be detrimental to public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant. adverse environmental_ impacts. ' In addition, the proposed use and site plan together with the recommended ! conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable f provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City STandards. IV. RECOMMENDA7ION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 89-28 subject to the conditions contained in the attached Resolutiu.r and issue a Negative Declaratio-n for the project. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 89:28 SHOOK BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. JANUARY 9, 1991 Page 4 7spe y subs . Brad u er City annex n BBtijG:mIg Attachments: Exhibit-"A" - Site Utilization Plan ;/ Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit ,"C" _,'Grading PI-an Exhibit "D" Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Tree Plan exhibit "G" Driveway Study Resolition of Approval with Standard Conditions Alh t, p i El j f ❑ El c�t j IF_ ❑ o� ' S7E 0IUMAMN PLAN 1 C OF TC' CA19 ONGA <. FLANNINC;-.DM- ,,SION KHI�TP: SCALE: WTS -� zj- �ea�►�e S�3e cr4 �� Zcab. FIctr, A Ll i..�... 3 l� �` 'fie t i L: g r• j .k ;: I I'Llit" Aft IN- I all %y a g n �irp 6i 6 y. a �\ ! gQ 1•� Yl�h r A+y ------------------- _ -_ ]3'�'iLs H1!(IS _...r•>hmu Was - ---' r t !i i it ii di ° t F ! i Fr. =F F :a aq a• __ 0 `j 1 q a z aFp xi 1 1 �a c p t llt Fi a ii t F � apt a sp! Fa tig �•� a ffei Fi�� a= x sx� i.�-F 3t a .. a �if x _.a }}p,, �v /!!it 51= !! zS Fa� ibis1ilt�t!'F. ti ii -c!a'1 ji Fii.iii F iF yt= ■ a l�tF ! o A i i�it �� g ss f' ii _i Iipa�!i}a a ee. :}iy a3ata ig se zax# i ' i :xi19'a a! s e a ��♦ ipi y F its ti a x i a3 s aEa F t i x i z s c! s l t o}a ii i tati z_x a F€g t aF a o�Ck c�L1 a•tF �i! �aa t iasx3 xaaix_aeiax it is't ii I� 6 : qq i ii it till i ix sss sFit!a y tya tFlii a-i Fe et .tt a 7i.iti F.x t p�i zg a is ,i, xila i Fz t cy tf r H. a t x t c s!tat t F a tF 1 ii, es i' t y t y}7i as ai`t a st sa:�.i! `'i'ti,t �i Fiit a Sitg flx !7t F!aa !i as s ft Fitt rs dif 3's` :ci!i!x I7c xi z 3 x a s teyi ity a ! i adi ixt s a \sF xs }i ig VJ ,ae IiIF aii.l�L a. i'1'i ixeiE tl.€i tsi a tilct sa :3 A!:11 � aF F`_I ii'!IN' i—� re G..tt llP""^ �\ sty: - 3`a LZ rC WN ov its NQ ` r co �' 4 ♦ ♦ �.� 10 1 Mix a x 5 : •n + ° dc IL s C a � i � R t � � � •a�' ® Q a ai4w tsr rt dL c � d o C M. �Y s r 4fi i a �4ri �� las iti s'�q 3 � rzw �• 9t :vt98=Rar �x a zt qbq r d I ILI Cn I _. �n MI- i .a a` 212 m L7 "g r r (1 ®. 133tl25 „_%.IS �a C*AJ # z q `{ L } _r -Fa II Qo FfS r� zi 17 t ce. 1 ae zl cu 'Leo � y ~ J •�y rJ 9 rt;, < 000 deUl i th 0 a 01 . e RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT. REVIEW NO. 89-w28, LOCATED AT '9810 6TH STREET IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 5) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERP,Sv - APN: 209-211-19. A. Recitals. (i) Shook Building Systems, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 89-28 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this ,Resolution, the subject evelopment Review re lest is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 9th of January, 1991, the Planning CoR;Qission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption o `this Resolution have occurred. ., B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This, Commission hereby specifica"t{y finds that all of the facts set forth in tt:a Recitals, Part A, of this Resoluti:-% are true and -rect.. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referznced meeting on January 9, ,11"% including ,written zad oral staff reports, thil ;ommission hereby specific,,iy finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9810 6th Street with'a street frontage of 665 feet and lot depth of 615 feet and is presently improved with a 32,750 square foot manufacturing building; and (b) The pn�)erty to the north of the subject site is Industrial Park and Vacant Land, the prope.~ty to the south of that :site consists of industrial Park and E'v!r� hou:e, the property to the east is kail'read S-ur and Recycling Center and t�w property to the west: is Industrial, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Cmmissi-n duri J 'the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings :o . facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 abov-, this Commissiun hereby fi-,;ls and concludes as follows; --r3 ', � P, AGENDA-.,, JANUARY-l' 9" 9 070 1-0:2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 89-28 - SHOOK BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. JANUARY 9, 1991 1 Page 2 (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; oc ted; and - (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicabie thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties �;r improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby ads and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance witb the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commissior`hereby issues a.' Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conflusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby ap{-,-j=ies the application subject Allk to each and every condition set forth below &'?d in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Maw Special Conditions: Planning Division; 1) Provide a landscape screen/hedgerow on the west and south sides of the temporary on-site retention basin. 2) The oversized trash enclosure shall b( `' reduced and a continuous planter to screen the enclosure shall be provided. 3) The trash enclosure shall have an overhead lattice cover. 4) The new 40-foot stack shall have a smooth finish and be painted to match the building. 5) The underside of the parapet extennion shall be finished to match the building. by returning the bottom of the parapet extension back toward t1ie existing wall„ leaving a small gap for drainage adjacelt to the building. 6) Provide a blow-up of the employee proposed eating area on AOL the north side of the building for staff review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Note: permanent concrete furniture is required for these eating 77 'PLANNING COMMISSLON RESOLUTION NO. OR 89-28 - SHOOK BUILDING SYSTEMS, ING. JANUA"RY 9, 1991 AIL Page 3 1' the final design of whi;rh must be apftovejl by staff. 7) Tree Removal Permit No. 90=22 is approved ;sub ut to the followii.g; a) Olive treef. No. 1-7 and trees. No. 9 and 10 shall_ be transplanted elsewhere, on-site for preservation. Their location shall be determined through review of the final landscape plan by the City Planner. br Tree No. 8 and trees No. 11-15 shall be removed and replaced with the largest nursery grown stock available as determined by the City Planner. c) Thosa tries which are to be preserved in place or relocated shall be temporarily , stored within an appropriate construction barrier, such as chain link fence, prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits and prior to commencement of construction activity. d) Relocated trees shall be properly maintained, ir,ciuding�,runing before transplanting and irrigation, i0 accordance with the recommendations of the arborist. e) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted which indicates the proposed location of transplanted trees and replacefi..�'nt trees'. 8) Chapter 1706 of the State Statues of 1990 requires the payment of a fee of $1,250 or $1,275 for every Negative Declaration and $850 or $875 for every Environmental Impact Report. These funds are payable to the County Clerk or State Office of Planning and Research, and are ultimately forwarded on to the State Department of Fish and Game. The fee shall be payable by the applicant directly tnereto; and this application shall not be operative, vested, or building permits issued or the map recorded until the applicant furnishes proof to the City that the fee has-been pa+'d. Engineering Division: 1) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical, except for 56KV) shall be undergrounded from first pole off-site west of the project site to the first- pole east of the railroad spur, prior to public improvement: acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 89-28 - SHOOK BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. JANUARY 9, 1991 Page 4 1 one-half the City adop-ad cost for undergrounding from previous development and future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2) A temporary detention basin to detain:,;.ncreased flows shall be constructed to the satisfaction of'tile City Engineer and as determined by the final drainage sfudy. 3) Landscaping within the "limited use area" for project driveways shall be approved by the City Engineer. A tree maintenance easement shall be provided for street tree;, placed on private property. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO , r�AMONGA BY: Larry T. McNie1, Chairman I, ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was -duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January, 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r 1� 1tA =s�i�C Y^45a YYyT C` 6�q �� C:. L C�. i n Y N • L d y O a sLMd n.9y Y.. Sy .G Y c sNe Y� iS d'4n_O ti GgiyMN '� p!� C1.C4 NQM +' Nam IdY V YYIh..O f� y.0 'L.�Y Ctiy y.Cb �+n C np kV_®®. y,g Y d ^O O iJ O _ a.•.- 0 0 +y O G 10 L G �Y9NGG y CU a L,+3+g4 O.Or Y 6 OYA _pcp L2L &usy,x���Aa g. c5 o5o a -SO N c....aNg LM Eb.Vi.O.r dya CN � pa C^ �Y^�qBl i o ■o'=��T d e qLg qN �� =Z^q� gg 4 GG MM a d4L L�C `OU. 0019 Y NG CNY 10 9qy a r c Lp Q.r?G QMom. JL® . you s �b 0� scgg W. o �`eyYy 4L oa o. Qau E G+�•0 Y4 _C4 Ll 03.:+ �w� d3yLuu `5...a c'u$ c.4,9t.§ oao ta A. �nu m � _r v u+ y a Ob^O. Y 6 N W 4 y N y S.27 H Sus .o. an 8V nL^ >a Iz dNa F W +ems u m No aas"Yca oS by a0 V .63 O LL l'/�1 :G C V' ai y pC ¢O S��C F to G po 4Q. P y^ o P'lll W ^ a 5.5 �Npg4.ya 40Y V�q. f Wo rfvWf_� ^ oc c IL ,J is �•: 6A9 C. .G �: F1I/lwiiii B:N�Nr��. a« � d'm.x ■�■s'ot`o�woa+Vga i'da' a yi a o°mooy i=� GO.OV OaA6 NYLG�y��♦�LryG $` ■A C �yq Nyp�49q T Aq+yy Z}}16N.L� OG. Gd ggqNpN6 6 d dlt yN. O� Gy Yl7 O■YC O�O YOS[[O Y=0 CA d g� H d= 9 Z aGN+e+ po. a $'isyy�c A 4 p COO �..CY O A Q♦l. N r i N L O q A 4 L A w _ tp tltl � y wo e� C®^pp O' LyLO�O^dp GNT.w Aa♦•.O i 9 L q3��; yp 6.LNL ONyL YO•LW SiF�pU�U Y�Nd Yr.^. 09L W �CN.q Y� �YNY Y^ M�.W^O ' C p p p N A u C N V O O A Y N 3� N LLY My AdG VYUY W 4S�..N W^ �' ^NAi +MN Y LOQ4i tly. c`nN'�ggw 'u`app.� <oa9 o�'Sr �E'.5 neO i«.GC..qu O$;S.N Ltt Cy O.O u66- YYV$Sc O% YuO T p� LLOC dG9C NAM N'SY �q.YL j.4 Y4 ON Na q�. llly.0 AyA Y " A O c�rc s co�uF y^A«o crs�� 4wy 5$4.�'- t9 ._.Ar scAM $o 3 y A'G O �Y�.y NY. Nn ''^ ✓ N d G y®y��tl ON V +' DLO OY Y � LAC i pG $c adL� �t. ■■Yd Ltl�y �puu a.o�pp w� ����� �� GAL♦ »�y{ LY O +.G TiLNL�O AGA pt �� L �� VY'OC 9CV N ' �pL~ 5 ya [1V bblA MPy dp 4 Ln MN�My LLN E~QO4L�� JOO�N GO^� Y 3.�'• A.0 OOtl CLO d.� a0 „-�ydYy Nan.'^_ A .. a�ig —4j.rid a N =^ aQ cg e�$ �Novy ^=w rd TIE- 1.5 uo La sc _� A5=15-$ay♦n aH uY dauu .ia �'•o t+ _ z,♦c.d.♦" ��s c$� �� . . vat ^m �N L�a9 E5. E{ np �a y.GNi O M T�}N� C`a pc0 -se ^-;�F6VS. O'LlyN �9�p C O L L O^ Z O Y pp^ �'C C 4 4 a O +N N Guu G 4'L. p♦.0 N� L9 ESN �9NC qS� +Y MG.�N+.C�^ Od^4N■ O �a 0{�. �.+AN Y> 'Y8 �r,,iCC1p CyVg dC a�Ga.GC >� _CGEs IL 4GL •^4 P V ,Y C d^A d.�LyO� yNF uV _ Y;s pA_9 N yr� YO99 L -GO$ a A E i O O J Y�LQ E „y S+ C N V C.25 a"M G w»tN O N C O v.F N o d tl C Y Y 4 0 M C�Y.A +il'Y. V pY g S O Q_+p w Y■C Y Q O M C±,O O Y qM0` Ytl L LO. Or9T .LACy` ^ .COY ^6WNY VwN A L^YyY + M 4 c C yyy S+ O♦ Y L A C O y C>N•n O S>` L 9 p1�d �1L tl.L ^ iW^. pp V Y "tell, I L Q R�[.OYp Gn. LL p y' ppNNr O^L pO VM O 000 p:2y Atl 7 ypLC ^4 yyy yLYLr.�, `Y Q. 4.4 4 6Mn-Y •CapLG N6 fLNO twn Ntl y9� <Y �MV GY q�Pr® �Ma NCB ��4�6L •fin � � ti • �I �( � �f I �I 1 G /� I .I aoeo co. g oc dlu 0�3o1'Ily:Inm i�O.p. y...5 aa. mu vY`D:M 1-�9Y ^ N. III P• 9OI Y^ O. d qGa 0 yy ■�Y.L LygqL" yl "Yp 09 'NO L •� 9yM C O f. YYL L pq�o. gTi�4 W i b`F CIr �N.CO gOOwtY aaOOL wl T q".. f Y l^ � V Y h�. �e —C^G O V vI•r'.NN L u 31 a N x O �.C a xupCV GYOI 7aL•l 9 'C y�4 Y6CYN.GPI �Y � aL �p. ^ ■N L COOy `pYi. VOyI. l+>>. �` .rw+Op NO YAiO '-d~O•^ C. Cna-C •yV.. wpN A— G C . `C.uMY (.�I O.� NOap CY 4.O«C p' ca�N. �cra 9.. iq`o c$ o^L t NY�cZ 'ce�6E C�qr C NUA —.� CI yA.M O YolYLyyybOHa p•N r'O ,C" ~1`OI Y t49^Y O Yrx4O Y FL a✓- .2 Y^^Y b rr• Y CL WNLL YY^Hq CCyi N b y a L4pl f g `{I V Y OIA NpL LL � Ytip ytl 00 ^Y o'La" pa"v'2� p Y _ C� O Ly4- ? �~L L9Yl:LYC NMT.pc M .�iNL Y Y Y Ox LY♦I -LN OI Jy fw ■V yN —^ 90�yy ^ 9yYq OY9^L. N�Nq 'K.—iI KN 3H0 HNt <NU p19pq�N LO t q�.65 L4 4.'�e Ow O is a�q vm 4y L u.4 = n5 c!qa —L:aeim 'Ys t72 o �p M pY yea« 4s n u$ y�,A L. .Nac .. um p cp .�o a� r•M n III ■ >t!o Y. A� pp YyV N yLLT.LY,, p� 4y 4Yy yL9L :p O = fppw L 4b c u a b b.. c c c �l .0 IaIll N u'� 4` p ro tee. Wiz q r4�2av L+�� O.T.a� N ^V)G 9�L •.• LI C^ a.� C� " C Mi, V �p�1 S`T V COS 4L L pv .LYn OY` �� ^hY AC=CLO L IC q O c .Y Y 9 C N Y V v�I C YGGG p�1 { aN u4 O4'd01 4. LOC '.N Y+00 «. �A "L00 SON �C�• +4 p�Lp • ' Lu■b■0 V`9, MNtl M pDp aG,4` iyn0 Kt-m > 49M HGq <U QV at IF .[Gw C.Li.mi W6 LaN Nis q y 6y� nY O C c.G q3A ^ pO is «pG a�piLLY qq C^ 2H LVy �L>. 040.LY C.-.yi.LL� VjC� A. nN Y+ O V. A. 9[ ' C Y C L `art L O.Y C P OI C • .. i« a■ ys C {� 'u Co.>.y 9N`U NYO 4 Q Uo YN.�y;� yNdYN. ^ LOI. O OO VO'q. O1bL u}s VC..R 1� -,2-•YA .l� L.uS MLp..9yMY .Cp ^L dP =pGoO N�^NGYyC C Vy {%�.^..' 'Cq VYSY■p G. MLG O ca9 YONO V ; L'O!L I W Oy aucu0y �. Op�11Yam �_«^r ro w i'o" cz ' LgoL. 'p�^ $u. 2 o$oa Z.: WyL. «�' o 3'�.ma p;e >0 c 6 cU� yy a ^�GPrJK Y.^a-1 K L 4 yyOvc .2 Ylet N Oy Nd. 06 « qS .0 Y I?FJJ qp 4y 8p d_�p YNY, .■`p�Nlo C«yyyL®B�, VN�tl o V. y U 00 N N®6« N wQ.v NC Y. O N HE I-- Q.`�� QGm O.. YCq m d� O M^CVNY ✓LCAVP O V V.GC n ny y O L N C ` •O L V. y's& O D Y y C LY Y w gq L O O 4 y A«.Y to '�`` O Y w f�a O4 r•C.[..✓ =LIL N.6. F4y DL11J L. b�LL1L1 y 6 N N <<i� tt V N • N ey a M mw K Nut ~I II 1 ~f Y Y �L Y 'Oyy V�L «� Lp C C pN� O N q q w < -E^LY ^ a Y OCBn 9cC tYl� qpj�yi ppDC' y L yyo Ma ` Yam L> LY.`i 9 NCO yw C� :.n yy >R q N O O.Y 6 f Y V L O V ' y 9 ��is ■yC6 L GO p Cp S q {��«u V O. It v G O A pC ■ go L�.q•'. q ori�a V.y _w.a vN �•�pw `c $mow 3 MLo.� s C. G M A N ON ` ' S. yYy}« H µ{y LYp qw 4 pY a «L `G• qf.YI P 6 9 4 1y6 YAS N >FyY CVOC L, SYY papNu �'a CGOV iO �Yu ^_•�_eer` Y Via` Y N Y ^ y.LL>pC ��. B1Y e.� VimL•• yL ,p 25 ifs. C C•nr ,«o W4 iiC p«`P N 1y y0 Y« CN Y V 0�60>�wy „ �NL 66_ qL o. p®� ON OwOA � qt� 9 aCp •L rruorx N 4 Y_yN P�yy�� 'J �G L.�pp 'O O�N.L''. Pa.Mtp V i � � L by�y L Y�HQy SON ��Vp vCyCy L YL Y L.Y O^� V v y.O4 ^�L Z�.pp p V . Q N C AO y C C +■ G N>(G(.. ■L q N L y N A.GG C. G$`_ �' GOO Op `9 O uW COJ 9O ' IO �O.'L.. 4 •„��+ CCU' 060C G� �q�Yi r CO .L Q yy�y G C A Y 0 9� ppppp r Vp'H 6O t o- tO4Y GV C. I r l NOIwgC ^ ,,GG DC D.. ,9waa GSM Y W10�. WY1 6Y�U '. rMp Y.� N M =0_ •JLSw 6 !may 4w. t6m O.V N.� U �• Y Y C \J1 HOC G'CN a GO MNNgg O C w.Lbc W Afth Is pp �jy 40 NMO O Gv Y - aQC >LCtl O�� �.tCfT Lq�sl 1 V. V yG`).=«. bG C Y Gr.Y YULiL NCO y^ V _ . L V ..Q� q.8 4 q a s L N G wO —R T O g� Y9rM�L tl 16 V q y11 9 N q �4 I LL � c :yyyy�•�� �L� CO °t yy s L �Cw 4^ Zc o=b o^'c�ypgc.a .u.. bpc ^v Y c r. c N.L rn e SLY« vL o o. o Y Z. z c aa M� co G C a V ■N W° 4 tl Y Y w � ^ C ac LQ� moo$« bC s Nm�F �N cY v a u°' t�i.m8� 4ouuOrnn = i ii•v uO O tC r&.o 10.��LY N v 4 9 = COW A� LM U.V ZN GM pLR? 6A LLOB� O 2 O y) �I �I tl•I NI �� ^I W Y C c tica \v ^ �YCtl.V 11%_fMyy LY LGC O N_oL c.c.6pp YY+Yiqq•tl« O.OtN L O NE C. q y c d.� O'= U OtlM d{�NN 40 _ �:N�• GLMI�.V C■C4� yG Yv N N O� O� �.` 4 C VY YV^ Lc6YG .1 O Yep l6tl ..M 4 O CC M tl.P O Yy^ �y < 444E Y''4 O NtY� �Jw Lam. §$�YYV.L y�ppy��Y Q Y A Z a • 8 5 L 9 y. w° O �C b4 Y 9 C�~�l 6� ad �N�tl e= tl pp G'40ppw..4.p . `OCM� a C p Yf GYOYy CV Yd Y� r9 G0 VG 'BUY Y a0 = vLLY YYY. Y OT4 qq rC y p N O L N atl i! Y E� Y°. L L{i 6L Ld p�p ipp�1.N �4 CY vY JcrGEY N«° ee.p lNCL. L tl a q tlWY <OOf wrf My ~C v9'~ ® °y tl O AL 4 L CY Y �Y Y e �L "p�YYmY $C° ^3.Cp�+,° wv G. « OrY°3yC G��' 'Cvcp'• «v v^ y Q.rY. ^ .> to 1.1C Lc a� .yo- 'c Go easyy a oC� vc.Y M.Co JJ Y V b y c_■ p� L° Y O.O L Y tl O T d�V 6 Mg 4Y _ s t N �O G35 4Y ^� yy N 4 tl. pppY YA 01�aqa O 11 Co YLLL «q Lc.Y6 pOl 3C Y Y t 3 6 0 aQ.~6 yL KOV 6O O 9��M. ay L.C.esz P t YN. - Y� WN4 WYLI. as tic i ICY —S.-z 4M Aa r P Q Y a y' da. o.RN w� c�..�• a L a A `e cQ. �� Y Yu eu Z.Slyyp" N �W au s'�s^iu y O'py®$jgyp YO..p AEU Y. L� ONio� � N r•. O � L.d' fj to Gp^ CV V LvI Y p r Y.� q Y q'-'.Nc `'�.L Leo.« aL+ ��aaG� s Nia '•L• a �' YY.:� or. « x„ 'r't.a oc o• e � � �E L^ ygL yo o•"•u >e - ri.� rc ' ugo.+o c:. "' «r sL � ',q` o a+Ya yLLy + LN Y Y'Lp • TYq 4� q�p + �m vL Q'C N a.t3 O N V_4 rO r� 4r C L L Na �q M � �y c OL O/ CZ O.a. C JRJ ' .Lye a 0� -y V L YZ A n M C W YY n d� YL • � ,l. �rG Yppa G +N L v n L` d y •a tt11 M es 'y.Y' Cpp =L BY O nw2 C. �y Y 6 'Y d Z W� Y 2f, i1.2 "� p g ar6� ate^ Q T� LL o .G 0E L �� ` ^oVVVVVV� 6qn 'Vv<V� �y ^s ,.ar mayy^ s�« �. 9 dV\I sN+wL c be oo ua e„ 4„ �. L C a L^ Q^ d W �.a n.,. v� yyy■ ^ y N_9 y r .■yy�N t■C y�NQ y^^, gyp Y.yu9 Lr L y� YsL 4 �pY CY W 'MNY C C __tatg�. Y p N•o v. e'�, �. z MW Ltr;,�41 «.c r..nacg Q�L WY L Y7.� 6.L. ti F� y `'�C 0. G.W q.. QOWIt NI G-5 �I ! J Z 9t OI c Y L CL-6yYy NtY' OI C� I C Y !•T N 01 « E G�•� 4 Y JML Rp FJy LL� y �w w y V V.O M V;:C G V.��yin •+C L. O N.Y� V ; U \S�� C�.y ON fc s�Eq off► �. ��� L P � .$ � 4a QYYV 00! u �,� S� • VI u � � pp c Y G� P�YO �CV V � 61�U b Yy 3u ANY COM q.�. e as no v`N �oc �q uOy U 1Z�Y Y 'Zz.00 ya tzL VpE� Y `G CV ^Y .=.1'�:++ ~u .wsuo NAA qua a ^�.�Y aye wp. �'.� u4$ €'$LNCNCS NC �G eO 4YLY 4.1 ���� �w Q �d ■� V01w''{O>{O�I Ow.0 NOY. �}aY� L.^ V�Y $Y y N■Y�� MU NO. U V : g0,9 U. . G. yyQ L1Q �C 9 VGA yM NNY�> w ■V �^ $U a OYn `..Y�. `ari !S•.. yU-YYn�C O��N dM 6t�i ^ G� ` 6L. •Oi a OOCayy MwG LLV.; KN Y�NM Y.� <W yYI� 4= 6N.�.w �� Gl:, ✓� GJ.GSa low 6�pC C r' Y N � L CUY of RANC?30 CUCAMONf-A q r = DATE: January 9,i'�1991 1 -3 1 TO: Chairman a,nd Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bull jr, City Planner BY: Jerry Gua' racino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: USE DETERMINATION 90-05 CALIFORNIA COPPER RECYCLING, 1NC. A request to determine the proposed use of striping and rebundlirig used copper wire as medium manufacturing rather than a scrap operation. I. BACKGROUND: 1'he applicant, George Fox, has proposed., the establishment of a copper recycling- facility in an existing, vacant industrial building at 8889 Etiwanda Avenue. The site is located on the cast_side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of the ,;AT&SF railruad and is designated as Heavy Industrial, Subarea 15 of the Industrial Area, Specific Plan. After reviewing the proposed business, staff determined the use matches the definition :of a Scrap Operction, rather than Medium Manufacturing. In Subarea 15, Medium Manufacturing is a permitted use, while Scrap Operations require a Candi-tional Use Permie. The applicant disagrees with staff's determination and requests a lIse Determination from the Planning Commission. Attached Angr review is the November 14, 1990 Letter -i;•on Steven Smith, on behalf of the applicant, stating why the proposed use should be classified as Medium Manufacturing. Also,. attached is a project explanation sheet from California Copper Recycling, Inc. and a copy of the "permit to construct" with conditions from the A.Q.M.D. ' II. ANALYSIS: A. Description of the proposed business: California Copper Recycling, Inc. will receive previously used copper wire and pipe from v%irious sources such as Western Electric, Phillips [lodge and the City of Los Angeles. The wire stock will be striped either through a simple mechanical operation or by heat processing; whereby the coating is burned off the copper. The reclaimed copper will then be cooled and placed on palettes for shipment back trj its point of origin, The proposed equipment will be capable of producing or recycling approximately 10 tons of grade 1 copper per day. The ash produced from the heat process will be non-toxic and !rill be. disposed of at local landfills. ITEM H ,I i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UD 90-05 -- CALIFORNIA COPPER 1ECYCLING, INC. JANUARY 9, 1991 Page 2 B. Definition of Medium ManufaL-uring and Scrap Operations: Witacoed for your reference are the definitions edium Manufacturing and Scrap Operations. The key phrase which best: _ describes the proposed use is contained in the definition of a Scrap Operation and reads as follows: "dismantling of used, recycleable, or waste materials except when such activities are part of a manufacturing operation,." The proposed use clearly involves the dismantling and'l recycling of waste material; and since the recycled coppeO will not be used by Californ=.4 Copper Recycling, Inca �n %ny manufacturing process, staff found that the proposed ase fits into the Scrap Operation category. The applicant contends that the u,e is not a scrap operation because California (:nppe) Recyclid'g, Inc. does not buy the waste copper rr sell the recycled product to a third•party. The operation wiTi—be conducted solely on a contract basis whereby California Copper Recycling, Inc-„ will !: perfprmi,ig a service i.e., stripping copper wire for reuse py the &-,rinal copper supplier. Theref re, ownership of the copper will not change hands and Califorma 'Copper Recycling, Inc. will merely process the material. However, staff believes that the definition of Scrap Operation does not require the sale and/or transfer of rn+nershi p of„the recycled product to qualify the recycling activity as a Scrap Operation. Further, staff interprets "sale" to include retail or wholesale of goods and services. jBased upon the above analysis, staff concluded that the proposed use, copper.recycling, fits into the Scrap Operation Category. This interpretation could require the applicant to obtain a Conditional Use Permit, rather than allowing the proposed use by right. III. RECOMMENDAtION: Staff rec=iiends that the Planning Commission make the determination that the proposed use be classified as a Scrap Operation. If the Commission concurs, then adoption of the ttach� Resolution would be appropriate, spect ul subm' ted, Brad 11er Cit Planner 7 BB:JG:mlg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UD 90-05 - CALIFORNIA COPP R.RECYCLING, INC. JANUARY 9, 1991 r Page 3 Attarw,irnts: Exhibit "A" - Project'Lkplanation Exhibit "B'" - Definition of Medium Manufacturing avd Scrap Operations Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" Elevat;on of New Outdoor Egtti-pment Letter from Applicant ii Auk PROJECT EXPLANATION FOR CALIFORNIA COPPER RECYCLING, INC. California Copper Recycling, Inc. of Los Angeles, had received a "Permit to Construct" a copper recycling facility from the South Coast Air Quality Management District at 8E89 Etiwan.da Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This location is within the "Heavy Industrial`" area of the City as depicted in the "Industrial Area" Specific Plan. This designation requires a conditional use permit for such a use. The following are specific details of the prcject. Location: Southeast cornet of Etiwanda Avenue and the Atchison, Topeka and Sa=ita Fe Railroad right-of-way; approximately one-half mile south of Arrow Route. Parcel Size: 4.25± acres (Note: The eastern 1.9± acres are encumbered with SCE easements and a drainage channel.) Existing Building: A vacant 10,000 sq. ft. industrial building, a sq. ft. is dedicated office space; the remainder is warehouse space. AMh Prior Building Use: A trucking company and truck scale,5 were the immediate past users. Percent of Building Coverage: 19"n (10,000 sq. ft. of 54,700 sq. ft. net). Number of Employees: Five (including secretary). Hours of Operation: 6 days/week with two,10-hour shifts. Number of Traffic Movements: Two to four truck ingress trips/day (20,000 lb. load, typical); 20 employee ingress trips/day. Rail Service: None Basic Facility Operation - The purpose of this facility is to return used copper into the marketplace, thereby saving raw materials and energy for copper uses. In order to accomplish this, used copper wiring and tu`ing is weighed, then brought into the warehouse where it will be placed in small. "rail-carts" (approximately 6' Long) which enter a furnace. The heat is sufficient to melt wire insulation and other "wastes", but not high enough to melt the wire. All heating will take place indoors. After 30± minutes in the furnace the "rail-car" exitS the building and copper will be taken to pallets for loading onto waiting trucks. USE _DV—:C'62t4r1A 1 qo—off MUM �j am 4� "Waste" materials are non-toxic and will be taken U a nublic landfill site. A "Permit to Operate" has-been granted for this project by the South Coast Air Quality Managef;ient`rDistrict on December 4, 1989. Approximately one part/million of air particles will be placed into the atmosphere from this project. The conditions of apprny31 of This "Perp14t to Construct" ,are attached. Local Desirability - The property is ideally located with compatible land sues an all sides. The nearest meighborino; structure is more than 226 feet to the north. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa" F'e Railroad right-of-way separates this industrial building to the north from the subject property.: To,the east of the site are SCE.easements totaling 250 feet which also contairC,'a drainage way. Beyond the easement is a large industrial building which is currently vacant. The pr,-)erty to the south is vacant;, The power plant for Southern,. California 'Edison lies to the west. This area is designated as "Heavy Industrial',' by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.. Because rail service will not be ; necessary, the project will have no effect on rai11traffic. -i i � Ap lication�t FERMI t No. T® CO,NGT-*AUCT 'l�®�� Page 1 9150 FLAIR DRIVE,EL MONTE.CA!IFORNIA 91731 D Granted as of Aecembvr 4,3989 Legal Owner 1D 073739 _ or Opersterc CA-.IFORNiA COPPER RECYCLING,INC 2041 EAST 15TH STREET LOS ANGELES,CA 90021 ATTN:MR.MARC WILDER Equipment Location; 8M ETIWANDA.AVENUE,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA LIPOIhNIA i The equipment described below and as.shown on the approved plans and specifications are subject to the special condition„or conditiors listed Equipment Dscription WIRE RECLAMATION FURNACE,-P-T W.X 16-0-L.X 1Z-W H„CONSIS•IING OR _ 1. PRIMARY COMBUSTION CHAMBER,415 CUBIC FEET,WITH A 50,OW BTU PER HOUR NATURAL GAS FIRED BURNER,A 2 H.P.PRIMARY COMBUSTION AIR BLOWER,AND TWO HYDRAULIC SIDE OPENING DOORS. 2. SECONDARY'COMBUSTION CHAMBER;'196 CUBIC FEET,VIITI•I A 2,wo,000 BTU PER HOUR NATURAL GAS FIRED BURNER,A 3 H.P.SECC�'• `RY COMBUSTION AIR BLOWER,AND.A 5 H.P.MIXING TUNNEL B!OWER.'.. Conditions 1. THIS EQUIPMENT MUST NOT BE OPERATED UNLESS IT IS":ELATED ONLY TO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT WHICH IS IN FULL USE AND WHICH HAS BEEN ISSUED A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT BY THE EXECTJTIVE'OFFICER. 2. A TEMPERATURE OF NOT LESS THAN 1600 DEGREES F MUST BE MAINTAINED IN THE AFTERBURNER WHEN THE EQUIPMENT IT SERVES IS IN OPERATION. 3. q-41S EQUIPMENT MUST Lr OPERATED BY PERONNEL PROPERLY TRAINED IN ITS OPERATION. 4. THE`DOTAL QUANTITY OF MATERIAL CHARGED TO THE Et U17MENT MUST NOT EXCEED 2000 FOUNDS PER HOUR. 5. THE MAXIMUi<S COMBUSTIBLE,CONTENT OF A CHARGE MUST NOT EXCEED 25 3 PERCENT BY-yT = 'T: PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT Mhu8li Page t t' 9150 FWR DRIVE.EL MIONTE.CALIFORNIA 91731 6._ THE PVC CONTENT,OF THE COMBUSTIBLE PORTION OF THE.WIRE COATING MUST NOT EXCEED 20'PERCENT BY .WEIGHT. 7. THE OPERATOR SHALL KEEP ADEQUATE RECORDS TO VERIFY DAILY EQUIPMENT. THROUGHPUT.SUCH RECORDS SHALL BE if—; "WED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AND MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE Fr� v111E OMCER UPON REQUEST. 8. THE TWO''HYDRAULIC SIRE OPENING DOORS MUST REMAIN CLOSED.EXCEPT DURING CHARGING AND DISCHARGING;.)F MATERIAL. 9. THE HYDR/:U X;SIDE OPENING DOORS MUST NOT BE OPEN UNLESS T4E DOOR FUME HOGT):,ND THE BLOWER VENTING THE DOOR OPENING ARE I1ti.l ULL Ti OPERATION 10. THE BAPHOUSE FILTER)-%DIA MUST BE OF THE GOP P-TF..X TYPE, Approval or denial of this api L; pOrmit to operate the above equipment will be Grade after an inspection to determine if to gmp'r. ibas been constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and if the equipment can be operated in compliance with 0 Rules of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Please notify SANTANDER BARROS at 714/=-6067 when construction of equipment is complete. This Authority to Construct is based on the plans,spe ificaiions,and data submitted as it pertains to the release of air contzminants and control mewaves or reduce air contaminants, No approval or opinion con=mmg safety and other factors in design,constm action or operation of the equipment is expressed or implied. �reL\ �y A ticatioa No. PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT' 27099� �• � 't Page 3 150 FLAIR DRIVE,EL MONTE.CALIFORNIA 91731 C` ASK Y r This Permit to Construct shaL serve as a tew-poraryPermitto Operatc provided the Executive.Officer is given prior notice of suchh intent to operate. T7 ';Tc-mit to Construct will become invalid if the Permit to Operate is denied or if this,ppplica'pon is .^nzelled THIS PERMIT TO CONSTRUC SHALL EXPIRE TWO YEARS F'0M "ill, E OF if MG OF A,PPLICATIOrl unless an extension is granted by the Executive Office &4 cQU 7,M.PUERTA e Principal,Oflico Assistant RMP/jas i F z, i Scrap Operation: Activities typically include, but are not limited to the storage and sale from the premises and/or dismantling of used, recyclable, or waste materials except when-ouch activities are part of a manufacturing operation, Medium Manuflictu-j-hi"' Activities typically include, u no fi t6, manufacturing, compounding of materials, processing, assembly,, packaging, treatment !r fabrication of materials and products which require requent large container truck traffic or rail traffic, )r the transport of heavy, bulky ' items. The new products are semi finished to be a tomps;.gnt for further manufacturing, fabrication and assembly. Mese types of business establishments are customarily- � directed to inter-plant transfer, or to order from industrial uses, rather than for direct sale to the domestic consumer. Such uses may include, but not limited to: canned food; textile, products; furniture and fixtures; converted paper and paper board products; plastic products made from purchased rubber, plastic or resin; fabricated metal products made from sheet metals; electrical and electronic machinery, equipments and supplies;pp , office, computing and accounting machines. Activities may produce noise, odors, vibrations, illumination or particulates that affect the persons residing in or conLucting business in the vicinity. Where 24 hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. ICY OF F. TC ?p;� tTCAMOIVGA TITLE: PLANIIstC .3VI ION { E TT: SCALE: N 1 S � t nn e fill; Is a 3_ _ yI "1 x �.•. i �. i .—.— - i�tq� s L wo an a. a J � � 1 iw�uas. 3l1V3AV COH1'M113� !• u (0 i a a Z 7 1 W co A 12— I� Z 0 n f'r r i ►, ' November 14, 1990 r! n t File: 256-03.E3cJ City of rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: Mr. Brad Buller Subject: Use Determination for Copper Recycling Facility on Etiwanda Avenue Dear Mr. Buller: As you recommended in our conversation of November 6,. 1990, I am requesting a Use Determination by the Planning Commission of the proposed Copper Recycling Facility on Etiwanda Avenue. This request ; ^, made on behalf of Mr. George Fox, who desires to file 1 this project through the City's Development Review process- rather than the use permit process. This will avoid the label of "Scrap Operation" and more correctly defines his use as "Manu'acturing" which is allowed in the Heavy Industrial lone through the Development Review process The City's definition of "Manufacturing" (in part) reads: "A use engaged in the manufacture, . ., of finished products.or parts, including nrocessina, . treatment and packaging of such products, . processes ' 'Alizing flammiable or explosive materials . . .." (emphasis added) The process utilized by California Copper Recycling, Inc. fits this definition of "manufacturing". The raw material processed will be o�solete insulated copper wire delivered to the plant on Etiwanda Avenue by such companies as Western Electric, Phelps Dodge, or various exporters such as Albert International and Harris Internation al. California Recycling will. not purchase any wire or other copper products. It will simply process wire through its clean-burning furnace and retu=n the finished product to its owners. They will act as converters for these companies. I am sure you can understand why we believe they should be defined as processors rather than scrap dealers. Aft L.D.King,Inc. 0 2151 East D Street,Suite 120A 0 Ontario.Cglitomla 917G4 4484 0 (;94)9B5 Sb92 C FAX(7f 4)98&5063 scrap operations buy and sell junk, paper, metals, and rags. The proposed project more closely resembles fabric convertors, plastic regrinders, or a refinery because it does zone of those operation: associated with scrap operations. in addition, the owner desire's to rehabilitate an existing parking lot. The previous occupant of the build_pg parked ten,or more vehicles, including trucks, on the property, The proposed project would require 30% to 40% fewer used spaces than the previous use. We request therefore, that the Planning commission determine that the proposed use is a :manufacturing use and not a scrap operation and therefore' allow the) project to proceed through, the Development Review process .\ Than)v ,you for youic consideration.," Sincerely, tep en J. sdith Urban Planner - SJS:mjo h J, - i __i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING A REQUEST THAT THE USE, STRIPPING AND`REBUNDLING USED COPPER WIREE, BE CATEGORIZED AS MEDIUM MANUFACTURING, AND DETERMINING THE USE TO BE 9 SCRAP OPERATION, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. j (i) George Fox, of California Copper',Qecycling, Inc., has filed an application for Use Determination No. 90-05 as ft�cribed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Use Determination request is referred to as "the application. 7 (ii-} On_-January 9, 1991, the Plarniny ,Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider,the aPnjli`ation.. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoFrl'on Cf this Resolution,�have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this )Zommission i during the above-referenced meeting on January 9, 1991 % including w 4tten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application-applies to property located at 3889 Etiwanda Avenue and is presently improved with an older industrial building; and (b) The subject site is located in a___Hep;y Industrial District, Subarea 15 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; ana- (c) Scrap Operations are conditionally permitted uses within Subarea 15 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and d) The proposed use involves the recycling of used or waste copper wire which is not used in any subsequent manufacturing process on-site; and AML 7 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. UD 90-05 - CALIFORNIA COPPER RECYCLING, INC. JANUARY 9, 1991 Page 2 � ) The character and intensity of the proposed use, most closely matches t�iat of Scrap Operations. s Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this G;asanission hereby finds and concludes that the use in question is not of a si�,f iar intensity to other permitted uses in the same district. 4. Based upon tha fir;dings and conclusions set'Thrth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application, and determines the use to be a Scrap Operation. 5. The SecrEte4k:.t this Commission sh4l certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF-JANUA&Y, 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiei, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City,jf Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of January, 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSc NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CIS,:OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��-,STAFF REPORT DATE: January 9, 1991, TO: Chairman and Mel"oers of the Planning Commission i FROM: Farad Buller, City P%ianner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE AN INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS AND STANDARDS FOR INDOOR SWAP MEETS I. REQUEST: The Planning Division has been approached by several companies interested in establishing swap meet facilities within the Industrial area. The "swap meet use is specifically identified within the Industrial Specific Plan as an Extensive Impact Commercial use. However, there are no existing development guidelines. Therefore, staff is requesting that the Commission direct staff to provide a clear definition and provisions for this proposed use. Aft II. BACKGROUND: In the past, swap meets were associated more with outdoor flea market type of operations which involved the sale or "swap" of used merchandise. These swap meets were usually held on weekends on drive-in theater parking lots; such as the one at Ramona and Mission in Pomona. Some of today's swap meets, such as the Orange County Swap MeeS. involve the sale of strictly new merchandise. Indoor swap meets are the latest variation on the swap meet concept, and are also generally involved only in the sale of new merchandise. III. ANALYSIS: There are two primary(Issues related to this swap meet issue; the first issue dea)s witW the existing definition and land use compatibility and the second issue relates to provisions and requirements for a swap meet' use. A. Land Use: Currently, a swap meet use is listed under the Extensive Impact Commercial category within the Industrial Area Specific Plan. SF--h a use is permitted only in the Heavy Industrial zone (Subarea 15) through the Conditional Use Permit process (see Exhibit "A"). Extensive Impact Commercial is defined as the following: "those which produce or may produce a substantial impact upon the surrounding area. Uses typically include but are not limited to amusement parks, drive-in movie theatres, flea markets, outdoor auction sales, or swap meet activities..." r ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PROVISIONS/STANDARDS - SWAP MEETS January 9, 1991 Page 2 There is no clear definition of the swap meet use within the Industrial Specific Plan. As written, this would include both indoor and outdoor swap meets. Typical activities, items, and location reiated to this type of use are not explicit within the Extensive Impact Commercial definition; Also, opportunities may exist for this use in other zones. For example, subareas which allow -Medium manufacturing may be compatible with swap meets. In addition, no specific regulations and provisions exist. There are a number of social dynamics related to this use. Whether indoors or outdoors, a swap meet use is sure to atiract a high concentration of neople to a site. Provisions and guidelines need to be clearly stated so that surrounding land uses will not be negatively impacted. B. Development Standards: Compatibility of the use within other zone designations, business licensing, parking, site ,maintenance, and security are just a few of the issues that'-ti".aed to be addressed in the Industrial Specific Plan. Seven cities with known,swap meets,' and Los Angeles and 'Orange Counties were surveyed'tv'�garding their land use regulations and requirements. Unfortunately, each jurisdiction haG'widely differing regulations. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that swayY meets ishould only be considered through a Conditional Use Permit process. Further, swap meet activities should be located away from residential and commercial areas and may be appropriate within General Industrial, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial anu"Heavy Industrial subareas of the City. . If the Planning Commission can support this concept, then stafk `may be directed to initiate an amendment to the Industrial' rtea Specific Plan to further clarify the definition of a swap meet and to develop suitable development standards. Re Kanner Brad f City BB:ALH:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Industrial Specific Plan Flap Exhibit "B" Industrial Specific Flan Summary of Land Use- I • w . l ��y�►�\� 4 y y�, VN Y CBS CAN R / taoo x8i #SsSFsk 7''✓l�%//yl4r n�r..:•r rr rr mar!//�fiI!///////I �. //,U,7q/r//f�/rr�rri >a.%i�!/>r�/yrI�/bipfi�+ 'j, ��• �ita0iie�, �i���� ;j'w'�` . l TABLE 111-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA o PERMITTED USE $ CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE NOTE:Non-marked Uses Not Permitted LSE TYPES Lan," IP GI GI 01 GI RI IP IP GI "' GI GI IP GI GI HI IP tP Subareas HO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 81,9 1011 1213'f41b 1617 i MANUFACTURING Custom = • • • e 40 ! Light Medium $HeavyMlnimurn'Im act Nova OFFICE PROFESSIONAL LtESIGN &RESEARCikAdministrative rti OfficeProfessional/Design Services a } �} } +Research Services a • • • e e • • • • • \YHOLESALE, STORAGE& L'ISTRIBU410N • ♦1+1 ♦ e' Public Storage } e q Light Medium • $ ©Hea y CVMMERCIAL At}rlcultutal/Nursery Supplies&Services • • • • u • • Animal Care + + ¢ ♦ $ Automotive Fleet Stcrapc + + Automotive Rental/Leasing • • • ♦ ♦ ♦ + �• + } } Automotive/Light Truck Rapalr-Minor • + + +' • • } + Automotive/Truck Repair-Major ( e + • + } + $ Automotive sales J Automotive Service Station + + ♦ + + + $ + ♦ + Building Contractor's office&Yards + + • •' • • A Building Contractor's Storage Yard i'• Building Maintenance Servicesk ' s e s • a • •I• : • • Building&Lighting Equipment Supplies&Sales • } • + + e • } • $ ♦ e • Business Supply Retail&Services e • e • • ° ® ® •!• • Business Support Services • ® ♦ • • ♦ • • • $ + • • •I • +` a i s Communlca tlon$ervlC•a Convenience Sales&Services + $ i` + # '! 4 + $ ♦ '} ♦ $ + ♦ $ $ if Eating&Denking Ustablishments • e • jfI e ! e is • a s • ® a ntertainment + E'itensiva im met Commercial t + Fast Food Sales + + 'o a ! $ + o I+I • e I Financial.insurance&Real Estate Services • $ t Food&Beverage Sales + + # + $ + + '�' ♦ $' + !~ $ ,} + }I Funeral&Crematory SO rvio�s $ + I'♦� i Heavy Equipment Sales&Rentals } } + + . ♦ + $ 1 e 1 Hotel/Motel + • a • I •I•I Laundry Services s •Medical/Neatth Care Service I• + + + + + + + +I+,�$I • +1 Personal Services ?$ # + + + + + ♦ + + ♦ $ Petroleum Products storage $ + + i 1 f�� • • Recreational Facilities + + $ ♦ $ + + ♦ • $ lj •( e Rspalr Services` O • + e • • • •r a • •1} Scrap Operation 1 CIYIC Administrative Civic ServicesA • • e e + • s a • • • Cultural ♦ $ ! + $Extensive Impact Utility Facilitles ♦ IFlood Control/Utility Corridor • • • • e e e • •Public Aaeambly + + +I♦ !+I +Public Safety&Utility Services + + ♦ ♦ + + +' + + + $ '�' t` }Religious Assembl + + # + + + $ "IP-Industrial Park GI-General Industrial MI/HI-Minimum Impact Heavy Industrai HO-Haven Ave.Ovoday District HI-Heavy Industrial CITY(.F RANCI�O CUCATTM�ONGA DATE: December 11, 1990 TO: Bob Mueting, RJX, and Central Park Library File,, r' ' FROM: Joe Schultz, C,LP, Community Services Director SUBJECT: MEETING WITS PLANNING COWaSSION DECEMBER 6, 1990 RE: ARCHITECTURAL CONC.,EPTS/FF,ATURES AF' CENTRAL PARK LIBRARY AND RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CENTRAL PARK VACILITIES Staff and consultants requested inpl't from the Planning Commission of the architectural concepts/features of the Central Park Library prior to the State Library Grant Submittal due February 15, 1991. Shortly after the grant submittal, staff and consultants will beSJUI the formal design review process of the Central Park Library if the library grant is approved. Regarding the site plan... Chairman MrWiol and Commissioners Chiti.ea and Melcher stated the site plan has evolved nicely-- one having purpose and good land form. Regarding the library building... Commissioner Melcher sttated that he really likes the architectural style. He has concerns that around the plaza the,three-story building looks as though it's tow '"enclosed. W. asked the consultants to consider alternative like upper volume. being terraced back. The architectural vocabulary is what we're looking .for in Central Park. Commissioner Chitiea likes the entry depth and enrichment detail. It's simplicity without a lot of plaster. Likes transparent front. The roof forms are what we're looking f- in Central Park. Commissioner Tolstoy likes; renditions, however, concerned about pedestrian scale to buildings scale Asked the consultants to look at scale and to alleviate the potential problem that buildings are so big that pedestrians cannot enjoy the architectural features. In conclusion, Chairman McNiel stated to the consultants that they have done their job bringing the architectural style of thrt library to closure and the Planning Commission has given their consensus to apply for library grant and start the design review process after the grant has been submitted. �' JS/kls cc: Brad Buller IiEH K t