Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991/03/13 - Agenda Packetw J... n �6 w q - i f CZr�x Clblv CITY OF r' i RAN M CL'&,VV0NrA Cl - PLANNING COMMISSION `1 G LGENDC'.,, J 1977 WEDNESDAY MARCH 13, 1991 7:00 P.M. RANCHO.CUCAMONGA CIVIC CI ER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE i RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 'CALIF'ORNIA 1. Pledge of Allegiance I3. Rail call Cc -missioner Chitiea Commissioner T- ; -stoy Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Valletta Commissioner Afei.cher i III. Announcements Iv. Approval of Minutes February 13, 198.1 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over,az.y item, it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13759 DESP.RCH DESIGN GROUP o A residential subdivision of 56 single `family lots on 1:4.01 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side., of Haven Avenue, north of the Southern racifia Railr ?ad - APN: 1075 - 301-17. (Continued from February 2', 1991.) p„ B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 90 -17 - S_IMPSON - The development of a 159,765 square foot warehouse distribution building on 7 acres of land in the General industrial District (Subarea '10) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located vi: the northerly terminus of Toronto Avenue north of Cleveland Avenue APN: 21-J-401-05. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT =REVIEW 90 -02 - SINGER & ASSOCIATES - The I development of three manufacturing and warehouse buildin4as totaling 91,576 square feet on -4.58 acres of land in the General Industrial District'� (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Center Street` - APN: 209 - 251 -10. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.- D. ENVIRONMENTAL A4' ISMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -04 - ARCH ITECTL. -' ONE The development of as 4,000 square foot bank building on 0.42 acres of land 'within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northt-asr corner" of 19th Street and Carnelian Avenue APN: 201- 811 -57 and 58. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative' Declaration. 9'1. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall- be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. E. TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 14055 - MODERN CORPORATION - A request to modify a one -lot subdivision for :condominium purposes to a three -lot subdivision of 115 units on 10.27 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling ,units r-er acre) located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue - APN: 207- 201 -32 and 12. (Continued from February 13, 1991.) (TO BE CONTINUED TO MARCH 27, 1999.. ) ii I a AM r. F. EN�, IRONMENTAL ' ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN HOUSING- ELEMENT REVISION '90 -03A - C: :Ty OF RAC *CHO' CUCAMONGA - In accordar -E with Article 10.6, Section 65588 of the California Government Code, a revision and update to the: City "Housing Element has been prepared." The changes to the document include: an update of. �Ehe Technical Appendix consisting of aocumentation and analysis Of current demographic trends, statistical informa+-ion and housing assistance needs, update anti revisions ,;-to the City's housing objectives and policies;: and development of :a five year action program designed to implement the City's overall housing goal. in addition, staff recommends issuarce Of a.Negative Declar. tion. (Continued from Febrtisry 27, 1991.) G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90 -44 - WEST COAT PER&GRMING ARTS -'The request to establish a :xance and vocal training school in a leased spa ae of - 5,98s square feet vIthin an existing Col +alercial center on 10.5 acres of lzn:l in t k�,j Specialty Commeresai District (Subarea 2) ol', the Foothill Bculevard Specific Plan, located'at 7966 Vineyard Avenue, F3 -F13 - APH 2.08- 101-10. Staff recommends issuance Of a Negative Declaration.. (Continued fro,a February 27, V,51.) H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSFSS ff AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13653 - MNA - A subdivision of 1.0 acre of lard into 2-parcels in the Very Low Residential District (le_s� than 2 dwelling units per acre), located Qn the worth side of Northridge Dive, west of Haven .Avenue - APN: 201- 182 -29. (mo BE CONTINUED TO MARCH 27, 19511. I. =TANCE 91-01 UN ,BERG CONSTRUCTION - The request to reduce the cornart side yard setback from 27 feet to 22 feet on an existing non- conforming single family residence in the Low Residential District (3 -4 dwelling units per :acre), located at 7565 Camino Norte Street - APN: 207- 042 -10. WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT J. ERVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13782 — CENTER STREET PARTNERS : A subdivision �of 4.53 acres of land into 3 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at,..,th,,, northeast corner of 7th Street and Center Street - APN: 209- 251-10. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. s. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSLIENT ANQ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -05 - JILL- BORDATO - The request to establish a; dance studio in a leas_d space of 3,150 square feet within an existing multi - tenant industrial - complex within the cGeneral Industrial District (Su'oarea 3) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9495 9th Street, Suites 101 and 102 - APN: 209 - 032 -24. Staff recommends issuance of a, Negative Declaration, V11. Director's Report8, L. XODIFIGATION TO TOWN CENTER - PHASING PLAN - WESTERN P OPy F-U.T - Consideration of am,ipding the phasing plan, for Terra Vista Town tenter, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (Reference Conditional Use Pe=At, 88 -12) - APH: 1077- 421-05, 06, and 18 M. MULTI - FAMILY DEyELOP14wr AMENDMENTS VIII. Commission Business IS. Public Comments Aft This is the time and place for the general public to address the - Commission. items to be discussed here are those which do not. already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 :00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be t heard only with the consent of the Commission. r- t. AM s` `a "' .,. :� s. - :Wt�aD nty�selriaob sr�W� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 13, 1991? r I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City 'Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13759 - DESARCN DESIGN GROUP - rest dent! a subdivision of singe family lots on acres of dwelling units per nac e t ) loea a anethenwest side rof Haven I' Avenue, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad - APN 1076 301 -17: (Continued from February 27, 1991) On February 27, 1991, the P1anping Commission reviewed the Mme extension request and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval. The applicant is in the process of preparing additional information pertaining to the potential of selective tree preservation. An oral report of these findings will be presented at the Planning Commission ; meeting. Staff is continuing to, work with the developer to address resident concerns. Respe sub d, Bra r City lanner BB: TG: sp Attachments: Time Extension Resolution of Approval RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIUrI OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 'CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO.'13759, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 55 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 14.01 ACRES OF LANE, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF r,APN 1076- 301 -17. A. Recital M Desarch Design Group has, filed an application for the eitension of Tentative Tract No. 13759 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Time Extension request is referred if to as "the application." (ii) On 'January 27, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88 -20, thereby approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract No. 13759 and issued a Negative Declaration. (iii) On February 14, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90 -21, thereby approving, Time Extension and modification to conditions of approval for Tentative Tract No. 13759. (iv) On December 13, 1990, the applicant filed a request for a 12 -month Time Extension. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution hava occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby,,; sound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranch. Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Crnnnission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence - presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follow! ": (a) The previously approved Tentative Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan; Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and (b) The extension of the Tentative Map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plans, Ordinances, Plans, Codes, and Policies; and PLANNING CDMMISSI'ON STAFF:,REPORT TT 13759 - DESARCH DESIGN GROUP March 13, 1991 Page 2 .(c) The extension of the Tentative Map is not likely to cause Public health and safety problems;; and '(d) r ! extension is within the time limits prescribed by state and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Cmmission hereby grants a -Time Extension for: Tract Applicant RLEation 13759 Desaroh Design Group January 27, J, ?92 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to tie adoptions of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY Or MARCH 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION OF 111E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG" BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairma-n ( , ATTEST; ra u er, S ecre .ary I, Brad'`Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning ) Cmmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1991, by the following vote -to -Nit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSa NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSt A-3 i CITY rO�F RANC;CHO CUrjjlAM rO77fNGA r DATE: March 13, 1991 ,t TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller; City Planner BY: Anna -Lisa Hernandez, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW '90 -17 - square' o£ wa re Ouse distribution development u;iding on 7 acres of land in General Industrial District (Subarea 10) of the industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the northerly terminus of Toronto Avenue, north of Cleveland Avenue APN: 209- 401 -05 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Kegative Declaration,` &. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Heavy Wholesale Storage & Distribution ; - Subarea 9 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial) South 1:ight Industrial; Subarea 10 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (General Industrial) East Southern California Edison Substation; Subarea 10 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (General Industrial':' West - 'Light Industrial; Subarea 10 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (General Industrial) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General industrial North Heavy Industrial South - General Industrial East General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant and slopes from the nor eay to the southwest at approximately 2 percent. ITEM B V PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA FOR DR 90 -17 - SIMPSON March 13, 1991 I Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re ufred Provided Office /Admin. 81000 1/250 32 Warehouse /Dist. 151,766 1 /1000* 20 1/2000** 10 1/4000* 28 * 1st 20,000 square feet ** 2nd 20,000 square feet *** Over 40,000 square feet II. ANALYSIS- A. General., The applicant is requesting an Environmental ssi�essment for the construction of a 159,766 square foot speculative light industrial building. Upon approval of a Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant approval based upon recommended � p Conditions of Approval from the Design and Technical Review Committees. _ B. Des�ii n Review Committee: On January .1, 1991, the Committee ea, cc o say, routil ) reyi n,'�.l the - project and j re:ommended the following revisions: — - Site Plan 'textured 1. The pavement at the drive entrance to the project should be extended parallel with the landscape planters. Staff Coment: The plans have been revised °as recommended. i' Architecture: 1. The - sandblasting' treatment to the southwest corner of the building should be extended along the west and south elevations. J Staff Cement: The plans have been .revised to reflect the extension of the sandblasting and horizontal storefront mullions °'.treatment on the -fest elevation. In addition, landscaping has bren , increased on the south elevation between the screen wall for the dock area and the pop-U6;i entry element to minimize the view impact of the dock area from the drive aisle.. 9--2 PLANNING C04MISSION STAFF REPORT j EA FOR DR 90-17 - SIMPSON March 13, 1991 Page 3 2. The sandblasting treatment should be of a medium texture for better texture definition,.; Staff Comment: The plans have been revised as recommended. 3, The sandblasted panel treatments on the south, west, and east elevations should be carried, onto the north elevation along the second reveal line Staff Comment: The plans have been revise`1 as recortdmended. 4. 'The applicant should select a new a;�cent band which is more "pure in Color." The color band should be moved away from "rust" tinges. Staff Comment: A revi,�ed color board has been submitted showing a pure red shade. Screening: 1. The proposed wrought i -a:11 gates should he replaced with a louvered type of material for better screening of the dock area. Staff Comment: The plans have been revised as recommended with a louvered wrought -iron treatment for the proposed screen wall. Landscaping: 1. A primary concern_, of the Committee° related to the landscaping treatment on the south side of the project. If the Metropolitan Water District will not allow tree planting along the easement, a 6 -foot planter for ground cover and shrub planting should be maintained on the south side. In addition, the planter between the dock area and the employee parking area should be increased to a width of 12 feet and should include the trees from the south planter area. I 2. The landscaping should be increased at the entry, employee plaza area, and dock /employee parking area for better screening. Staff Comment: The plans have been revised toishow increased landscaping,: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RF' AT~ EA FOR DR 90 -17 - SIMPSON March 13, 1991 Page 4 Rail Spur: I. As required within the Industrial Area Specific Plan, the applicant has designed the:- :project to accommodate a rail spur line on the north side of the project. However; concern was expressed by the Committee regarding the connection of the main Line from the northeast to the site. The applicant should submit written verification from the AT &SF rail company that the necessary grading and installation of the spur line will be allowable at some future date for the proposed project. Staff Coement: The applicant has submitted a letter from the affected rail company confirming the project's ability to accommodate a, raid spur (see 'Exhibit "F"). C. Environmental Assessment. Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant„ Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or 'safety, or cause nuisances, or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan,_ together with the reca.;:+ended conditions of approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for Development Review 90 -17. Respe y s , /Brad uiler City Planner BB:ALH /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Rail Letter `S� - oa-axs s z-o- s =: rwaamtivamnain o,ouru .vma�ra�v. f J \i `�I 1027) �I.3tR(tJ. oiur��oi ennv�oo �anM'cr Nrmrs. '.^� r � nf 24 lit I 7l..: H it la I { I 1 i r S - •.rrrr.rrs -r tsw �r,.:, -r->:a rs�- rs ...-•rrr�•s•a�- �- �:r— •- ?:3 -�.v- :,° { e D _� a ' ssj: } }: t }:t'7 t tt 2 i l�� Sr •tT —� ; � l� �? Jar e � �l 11 ># { o + fill - �° '� ` • E� I �C iti• �ft !� 1 It !!! all. . dfillt tfl!' a iI 3 gi ` t i�i lilt ;t iti: ci ." 1 h 11111111 I1 i1H9 H. Ph Of. H, y� Ll-C1 ff ""Assn 335 ` ts. '"tii Ti �• aloe Jm "♦ .in. ZI t "'.Mil LLi Li j Ltr LAI,i \'I. •4-._. s. . .� ^ \ \ >. \ «. � >y . .: :� . . . . �� 2� � . . >.. .� \�<: . — . . .. . . �� »§ �.�.. \ « \... \ \ \�. � »� <. �� . . . :�� ;� \ � ��2�. :» \��«� >y . � � y . �� +y. ��ƒ . . ..�.�..,. . z �: �-Js � �. .. � . .. .... . .,.:. . .. a ©:. »�, -»}« «. • � � _ � � }� . � � ¥��/ \ , \ � �y�� a� K ( � � ��. __ y �, \ ��} / : � � � } } < ; � � � . � \�{ ; . ��\ � : � � � � �\ _ «��/ _ � } \�\ - ° � { - } ` � � } �� ! } /�\ ��{ �\ } \ , . d \ \ 1 � ?� \ - - � .= t� .� \ ©� \ . � ��\ .��/ ` - \ ,�� & \ ,�� \ ? - � « } \ � ��2�. :» \��«� >y . � � y . The Atchison, Topeka and Sant £e Railway C,mpany 5770 South Eastern Avenue September Zl, 195Q Lot Angelce, California 90040 K- Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Sam C. Longo, Jr. Colavin Group, Ina. ; 56 Ea3t holly Street, 0200 Pasadena, California 91102' ,_Dear Mr. Longo: This has raference to the meeting held:cn July`'25 at the site on Toronto Avonue in Rancho Cucamonga at wh:,ch time was discussed the feasibility of rail serving a warehouse proposed for the site. Your engineering firm has furnished "to John Fleming a proposed Man outlining a possible rail. spur. We have reviewed the plaza and It appears the proposed bvfil,ding can be served with a spur. A more detailed plan would h-- taac�fssary for our approval prior to actual construction of to track. If we can be o!l further assistance4 please- donot hesitate to call either myself at 4213) X89 -7643 or Mr. Flsmiaq at (714) 38G- 4E 077. , Yours truly, Ti A. K Industrial Development cc: Fir. T. H. Shalin, San Bernardino (11023798) Attn.* Mr. John Fleming Santa Fe Railway Company 740 East Carnegie Drive San Bernardino, California 92403 -3517 TAXj10310bg 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG STAFF REPORT DATE: March 13, 199 =` , TO: Chairmal and Members of the Planning Commits on FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant kaanner SUBJECT; ENVIRRTMENTAL_:ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 90 -02 SING - ER ANU—MIXIATES - - The development or tree man ¢ acturing an ware Ouse ,buildings totaling 91,576 square feet on A.58 acres, land in the General' Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; located at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Center Street - APN: 209- 251 -10. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:' A,. Action Requested:- Issuance of a Negative 0eclaration. i B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin or - n ustria building; General Industrial District (Subarea 5):_. South Industrial building; General Industrial District (Subarea 5) East Vacant; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) West - Vacant; General )Industrial Districat (Subarea 5) C. General Plan Desi nationgJ` Project Site enera ojlustrial , North General Industy ai South - General IndustHal East - Industrial. � ?ar k West - General Induetrid D. Site Characteristics: j The project Bite is currently vacant anff vegetation consisi;s of nati,}e grass and ,seeds. Natural ground slopes at an aj)proximate 2 to 3 percent gradient from north to south. r I 7EM C PLANNING COMMISfiON STAFF REPORT DR 90 -02 - SINGtr(`AND ASSOCIATES March 13, 1991 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use iFootage Ra ±io Required Provided BUILDING "A +a Office 1,000 1/250 4 Manufacturing 1.9,160 1/500 39 BUILDING "B" +. - Office 1,000 1/250 .., q Manufacturing 18,336 1/500 "" 37' BUILDING "C" Office 2,000 1/250 `� B Warehouse ,. 1/1000 24 ^20,000 20,000 1/2000 10 10,080 1/4000 3 II. ANALYSIS: '- AOL A. General: The applicant is requesting an Environmental sA—S essment for the construction of three manufacturing and warehouse buildings totaling 91,576 square feet. Upon approval of a Negative Declaration, the City 'Planner will grant approval of the project based upon recommended conditions of approval from the Design and Technical Review Committees, B. Design Review Committee: The Design, Review Committee (To',;.--+oy, Hein ergPr, routil7 reviewed the project on Ssp`temSrRr 6, 1990, but did me recommend approval due to the folyowing concerns: 1. The concrete sto -face in the employee plaza adjacent to Th ;2 southwest corner of Building C should have enriched texture such as a salt finish. i 2. A low wall should be provided on t+te north and south sides of the employee plaza between Buildings A !and;;B to provide privacy. The concrete surface should also have an enriched texture such a salt finish. i PLANNING COMMI&IION STAFF REPORT DR 90 -02 SINGER AND ASSOCIATES March 13, 1991 Page 3 3. Moi,r'contrast should be provided at the orfice f' areas for Buildings A and B. This Gould be achieved by raising the parapet heights. 4. Submit a revised color board. On September 20 , 1990, the Committee CChitiea, Tolstoy, ifroutill reviewed revised plans for the project and recommended approval with the following condition: 1. A six -foot °return should be provided for the parapets on all building corners. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the initial Study was complete -by- app nt ca. Staff completed Part II of the ?. Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of a '?egative Declaration or Development Review 90 -02, t Respe submi d, _ 1` Bra er 1 City P anner i BB•TG:�is Atl,achmefl�. Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "P," Detailed Site Plan Exhib', "C" ._,,Srading Plan Exhibit "D" = _Landscape Plan „ Exhibit "E" - Building El.evations lit i �_3 i I >' ? ITEM: vv- 40-6 OF AA1, ^HC3;;CUCAPviONGA PLANN DIVISION TITLE: N ING• EXHIBIT: SCALE: 1 q i f %ilra a as O[s ■-T 6 � i a • 5 1 q i f t , 41," all Al 11 ( gg � hi R r-' yi.- ��. �� `y � � �� I � F � 1 • Iii :-'1 W c � r i 1 , 111111 F. '- I I Ii I I _ I Ico C'6 { r coc ma <m we xo�c m.I NOrt02�o iwmios,t t 1 t P COPJMR'OP 6ULDM C PLAZA jj ;c A OWTNWE87 COANM l.OF KMWINO C Kx2A ? 'tie �Y yYF�.r• OF I3ANCH0 ,.CUCAMONGA PLANNING- DIVISION i C -8 y C -8 J 2 �o6ocaoo a _ 0-5 LAII m o x n' J i f fit 0 see m I mWil s n J 7 =ppage t) W] qp Q C� .� j all 'I I ': ti v Aftk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT D. ,e: Mar ^.h 13, 1991 C TO: Chairman &nd- Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buyer, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL A'-SESSMEYr FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -04 .ARCHITECTURE ONE - The development of a 4,000 square foot bank building on 0.42 acres of land within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Corranercial District, located at the northwest corner of 14th Street and Carnelian Avenue - APN: 201 = 811 -57 and 58_. - I! I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance df a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South Commercial center; Neighborhood Commercir',Distriet East - Commercial center; Neighborhood Commercia, District West - Single family homes; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Desianations: Project Site - Neighborhood Commercial North - - reeway South Neighborhood Commercial East - Neighborhood Commercial West - Low Residential D. Site Characteristics: The project is located within a fully- developed commercial center. The project site currently contains a temporary structure used as a bank by Pomona First Federal. Natural ground 'slopes at an approximate 2 percent gradient from north to south. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provi-`°a - Bank 4,000 1/250 16 15 ITEM D o PLANNING DOAMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 69 -04 - ARCHITECTURE ONE March 13, 1991 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting 'an - Environmental Assessment for the construction of a bank building totaling 4,000 square feet, located within an existing commercial t }; center. In contrast to the existing bank, the new facility will not include a drive -thru Upon approval of a Negative Declaration, the City Planner will' grant approval of the project based upon recommended conditions of approval frm the Design and Technical Review Committees. U. Desier. Review CoMittee: The ' Design Review Committee IChitiea, Tolstoy, K outil reviewed this project on Novembe -- 19, 1990, and January 17, 1991, and recommended approval with the following condition; 1. To create a strong entry statement, interlocking pavers should extend from the Carnelian rights= of-way to the end of adjacent planter areas. Interlocking paver color should match the roof the color . and pedestrian circulation_'' interlocking pavers. C. Envirot'liental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the ' appl --cant. Staff completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no ;significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for f Development Review 89 -04. I Res Brad e City Pl nner BBTG :3S Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Dotailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" — Grading Plan Exhibit 'D" Landscape, Plan Exhibit "'E" - 'Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Building Sections Exhibit "G - Floor Plan i 4 i z° CD ir i l a ° J ilil�i! W I �' I i; i' • vs o IV m z m �,�.. , i i ail ] I I AMOL A J f s w --- -y W x° — O 1 _7 'll ve � r I i I )14 W �p 76-s fit Fl I ` *n r-c- ZW C�a i t 1 r z all iV ir 9 { yj9} si 2 1 t�3 al y ' ZI LU it j c ` to p G LI I F � � m f `, •• {f111 i ItpJ 1 I •� NZ) ' 1 I(T- cnz CL J iv 0 1 �( f Oi Q rr 11"N LU LU Cc k I ��♦ 0.% dIC�4MdT�ygN YM trW /onMYeel�gw.phfsli�WeCNlpry t IMwriy {wiMS•WCN�biMCLLy �.. r+Y MIYaMreMl. C0.7elu hNC I 1• 3 Y'.wcN MMUrIUn wil ` • �' �� fr�W w�w..GpiMr��rilYa I lYwiW ce pweKaen ® Wlies OW T.r. S�1errwCN+'6�dL' I a. te1 Kweea ar.Y... un•, e upwlwlowycnwr.yps..l�'+cMl '. � W 1 � _) $]bWow..ClMa Rcwr:. � Q i S Osw wnwlpranyd Yw�wl �npb�Mldlll lct •• `? ITEM: CITY OF A8dveH F:;�UCAIC ONGA PLANNIir d DMSION TrrLE: n ► N ' E%RMIT: V sca b '�` z TTEw %3y OF P_lUvUH0 CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVASION TTIZE. a N EXHIBIT; SCALE; )i T CITY OF CHQk � UCAMONGA Q: ► 1 PLANNH46 • DWISION st { •�HIBIT: iSCALE "�'� �i"Tt G vAu L'rSo GEd L �WSt -t 'lb P�AG,L ✓ � ' r-LvnR sruo WALL ✓ lTXmc ;;-rlA" f I t ; i?F AM, Cif .CUC.AMONGA PLAZd1i1liq DWISION TrrLE :. GkL ij N � u Ft EXHIBTT: �j SCALE: 0-1 i lki F-A fluu- t +. i y I ' 1 _ \jt Will i14 1 SST \ F ITEM: T3 CITY OF iCHp �CUCAMONGA � N PLANNIN' DWISION TTTLE: �` 14 4u, r Exxiarr: scat: - Q -!2. f� ITEM: c OF RANCHO C CAMONGA TITLE: N Pi.ANNiNd- D ION EXHIBIT: �I SCALE: D-/3 i `r-- ------- - - - - -y rat 44 r 1 i � _ rn K i 44 il! 1IL- r — L4 dl j ?MMtlN tT( [ZOOWi i T-T I� oa , �, e % 1� OF FiQ 3�TCFif ,,fiyUCAMONGA �,1T7.E: ,VY PLAN1'lfid Dr" SION , fl EXHMrr. SCAL -- o - %s i 7, r CIZY OF RANCHO GUC.4MONGA AIM STAFF REPORT DATE: March 13, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Counission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 14055 - - MODERN CORPORAI ON - A request to modify a one -lot subdivision for condominium purposes to a three -1'ot subdivision of ,115 units on 10.27 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 _dwelling units`per. acre), located north of Arrow Highway and east of Baker Avenue APN: 207 - 201 -32 and 12. (Continued from February 13,, 1991). The applicant is requesting that the above project be continued to the ` March 27, 1991, Planning Cowission meeting. ,RespecStf4lly submitted, Br d Bu, e City lanner BB:BN:mlg Attachment: Letter from {Applicant ITEM E C� ii tt rr ,; L44RR ,,`per AN i ECH Plafning • EngineerJng ® Design `February 26, 1991 — REGEt1lED — CITY f C °ANCHC CUCAVONGt Beverly Nissen FEB 2 51593 city of Rancho Cucamong c Planning Deparl,ment AM 713.91101rik, RE: TepLa0 ve Tract )4055 Dear Beverly: 't On bebalf of the project applicant, Modern Corporation, ve hereby agree to continue the Planning Commission hearing to AM Piarch 27, 1991. ` Thank -you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Er110$L J. Peres i i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �t DATE: March 13, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION 90 -03A — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA In accordance with Article .10.6, Section 65588 of the California Government Code, a revision and update to the City Housing Element has been prepared. The changes to the document include:. an update of the Technical Appendix consisting, of documentatior. and analysis of current demographic trends, statistical information, and housing assistance needs; update and revisions to the City's` housing objectives and policies; and development of 'a five year action program designed to implement the City's overall housing goal. In addition, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration.' (Continued from February 27, 1991.) I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued,' as an open public hearing, from the February 27, 1991, meeting to provide the Planning Commission additional time to review the extensive revisions to the Housing Element. II. RECOMMENDATION; ;.j Staff recommends that "after considering information containi'd in the oral and written staff reports and after hearing public testimony, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending issuance of a Negative Declaration and approval of`'rhe Genera; Plan Housing Element Revision,.90 -03A to the City Council. A Bra R full i , Cit Planne BB:LH:sp ITEM F i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY:; OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR UA, RECOMMENDING_ APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -03A, TO REVISE ADD UPDATE THE HOUSING ELEMENT IN ACCORDAACE WITH ARTICLE 10.6 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, AND ISSUANCE OF A "_-NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND MAKING FINDI GS'IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamot'.ga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 90 -03A as ,described in the title of this Resolution. hereinafter in this Resol',Ition, the subject' General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the applicition. (ii) On February 27 and dontinued to March 13, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rarrzho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. v„ NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined,` and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearings on February 27 and March 13,19 °1� .; including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, tf4is" Commission hereby specifieaily'Finds as follows: (a) The proposed revision and amendment of the Housing Eleiient will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced' the conclusions and findings of the Initial Study Part II; and (b) The proposed Housing Element Amendment is in; substantial conformance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the 'Californ(a Government Code as evidenced by the revisions made to the document at the %request "of the State Department of Housing and Community Development; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 90 -03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 13, 1991 Page 2 Ask (c) The proposed Housing Element is consistent with the ether Cements of the General Plan as providet, throu;h the organization and construction of the General Plan into super elements in whi64.they goal, objectives, and policies contained in these elements are interrelated and 1_1"ependent upon one another, and as a result of the`recent technical update to the General Plan adopted January 4, 1989; mnd (d) The proposed amendment furthers the attainment of the City's overall houtinq goal through the development and implementation of the five-year action program and quantified objectives which promote the preservation, maintenance, and development of housing - :opportuniti'es for all economic segments of the community. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence'pr6tented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearfngs and upon the specific findings of facts set ,.rth in paragraphs 1 and 2 abbvP, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed Housing, Element Amendment is" in conformance with the General Plan. (b) That the proposed Housing Element`Amendment will not have' - significant impacts on the environment. (c) That the proposed Housing Element Amendment is in f substantial cumpliance with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code. 4. (a) The Planning' Commission specifically finds and determines that a Negative Declar'atZ ,)n for this project has been prepared in compliynce with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended and the guidelines promulgated thereunder; and, further, this Commission finds and determines that, based upon the findings set forth in Sections 1, 2, and 3, that no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. (b) The Planning Commission finds that the facts supporting the above - specified findings are contained in the Negative Declaration, the Staff Report and exhibits, and the information provided to this Commission during the public hearin0s; and, therefore, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and c;,nclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursant to Section 65850 to 55855 of the California Government Code, the Planning. Commission of the .City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of March 1991 of Gen2rai Plan Amendment No. 90 -03A. 6< The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNINe COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. GPA 90 -03A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 March 13, 1991 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT4 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arty c ie � airman ATTEST. Blau ,-,� Ilers Secretary I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the :foregoing Resolution City of Rancho was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning on the 13th day of March 1991, by the following vote-to-wit: Commission held 1,1, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIr-NERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f DATE March 13, 1991 ` TO: Chairman and Members of tPe Planning Committion FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Buckingham, Planning Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONnITIONAI USE PERMIT-90-44 - Tlie , request to establish +a dance and vocal traimngac ool in a leased space of 5,988 zr square feet within ar �,Xistng commercial center on 10.5 acres of land in the Specialty Commercial District c (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 7965 Vineyard Averue, F8 -F13 - APN: 208- 101 -10. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. I. BACKGROUND: At the February 27, 1991 ?�eEting, the Commission continue — Conditional Use Permit 90 -44 "and directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval for their review at this meeting. Attached is the subject Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 90 -44 as requested. Respect y sub ed, Era eP City P anner BB :BB /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" —Staff Report dated February 27, 1W Resolution of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT D'AT$: Februa;,t 27, 1991 TO: Chairmii._And-Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce:Buckingha Planning Technician oUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PARMIT 90 =44 - W-ST QOAST PERFORMING ARTS - The request to establish a dance and vocal training school in a leased gpaca?of 5,988 square feet within an existing remmercial center on IC -5 acres of land in the Specialty''Co- merci_xl District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Eoulevart= vpecific Plan, located at 7965 Vineyard Avenue, FB -F13 APN: 208 - 101 -10. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Meclaration. I, PROJECT &IT SITE DESCRIPTION: it •. �. Aat1rn', ::eauested: The applicant is requesting approval of a non construction Conditional Use Permit for a performing arts studio and issuance of a,Negative DeciGration; B. Surroutsding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant; Office Professional and Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Speci'ic Plan Subarea 2) East - Gemoh Center; Community Commercial (Foothill Boulwvard Specific Plan Subarea 2) West Roller Skating Rink; community Commercial (Foothill Bouleva.d Specific Plan Subarea 2) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Commercial North - Office' and Low- Medium Residential (4 78 dwelling units per acre) South - C:mmercaal E East - Commercial �. West Commercial ttt D. Site _CtiBractericrtaes: The project site ie within the existing Thomas Winery Plaza which contains ten buildings consisting of 100,103 square feet oL 10.5 acres. E. Parking Calculations: (See attached Exhibit "G ".) C�i' f PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90 -44 - WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS February 27, 1491 ' Page 2 II___- ANALYSIS: A. 99� ra : The applicant is proposing to locate within a 5,988 square foot leased spats occupying the entire second floor of a two -sf% ry building ip the Thomas winery Plaza (See Exhib }t "C "). Currently, th(4 first floor is va,?nt._ The studio offers jazz, ballet, tdo- dancing, drama,' -and voice classes. In addition, there will be a small retail area specializing in dance supplies. The applicant, currently has an er,isting location in Upland with established hours and clientele. The studio offers classes Monday through Thursday frdl,< 3:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m, and Saturday from 10;00 a.m.` to 12:30 p.m. (see Exhibit "E "). The studio hss recitals periodically but they are always held off- s!,te.. Special events, such as dances and fund raiserar, are occasionally held on -site but nsually after 3:00 p.m. on weekdays or weekends. B. Issues: The primary issues involved with this type of use in a commercial district__�=e parking, compatibility with surrounding uses, noise, and vibration,. The following paragraphs address and discuss these issues: 1. Availability of Parkin: This issue concerts thQ availability of parking, loading and unloading areas, and`) the additional impact of increased traffic within the site. There are currently 532 parking . spaces in the center with 24 spaces allocated to this unleased space (biased- on the office /retail formula of 1 space per 230 square feet). (See Exhibit "G ".) If the proposed use is considered a "Hearn Studio and :Spa" tc:r the purpose- of parking demand, 3 "J parking spaces �'tould be required (based on 5,161 square feet of dance fluor at 1 space per 150 J square fast, plus 827 'isquars feet of office /retail at 1_ space per 250 sgna*s iaet). Therefore, the proposed uf' would be 14 spaces short. However, there are several factors that reduce the impact of the potential parking demand. The studio is predominantly geared toward children under 16 years of age. There are 27 claoaes per week but only 5 in »lude students over 16 years of age. Therefore, most oil the students are dropped off and picked up. The studio does not hold more,'than 2 classes simultaneously. Since there - Is a -maximum s'f 12 studerte per class, no more than 24 students are anticirated on -site at any one time. Furthermore, though the studio has no formal arrangements,: it is not unusual that stw.entq share rides with friends '4members or other £ami; who participate. Also, it is not uncommon that several students take consecutive classoo. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 90-44 WEST COLAT PERFORMING ARTS February.27, 1991 Pago'3 All,^tf th6se .fora combined may help reduce trip traffic` and s]screase the amount of parking utilized within the center. Based on these considerations, it is staff's opinion that for the purpose of parking demand, the proposed use approximates .more closely a *Commercial School" which would require 1 space for each 3 students plus 1 space for each faculty mamber - in this case, 10 spaces (based on 24 students and 2. faculty members). If this formula is used, along with an appropriate limit on the number of students and faculty permitted under the Conditional Use Permit,' the parking available appears more than adequate. In order to resolve the parking issue, the Commission will need to determine whether the proposed use morn closely approximates a "r salth Studio and Spa" or a 'Commercial';. School" in terms dih._ite parking demand. 2. Noise and Vibration`..Conflicts: Potential noise and vibration conflicts arise from the use of sound systems and dancing:' ';,The building is cf standard construction and no special provisions have been made for noise or vibration attenuation. Therefore, it is possible that noise - and /or vibrations could adversely impact surrounding uses, especially the future first floor tenants. Acwever, if the Planning Commission considers approval, staff would condi_�'= the applict'nt to comply with all performance standards for noise in commercial districts. In addition, as with all Conditional Use Permits, if the uee causes adverse effects ,. =.gran adjacent businesses, the Planning Commission could reviaw the Conditional Use Permit for possible revocation. 3. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses: There are a variety of businesses existing or opening' Roon within the center including restaurants, a farmers' market, a pharmacy, clothing stores, and other small service -type businesses. in looking at the mix of %sees within the site, staff believes that the studio would not create any adverse impacts that_ would he incompatible with the surroanding u ®era, other tfian the ones discussed in the preceding paragraph. C. on Staff has attampteci to explore various conditions to allow the use. Staff has compiled the following list of mitigation measures and believet -At is worthwhile for the Planning Commission to review and det ;ermine if some or all of the measures could reduce the parking impacts of the proposed use., �- j PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF,REPORT CUP 90 -44 =•WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS February 27, 1991 Page 4 1. All recitals could be held off - site. 2. The maximum number of students per case could be limited to 12. 3. Special events could only be held after 7.00 p.m, on i weekdays or on weekends. 4. The maximum number of clauses a+_:- any one time could be limited to two. S. Class 0„3es and times could be limited curing the chopping center peak hours of 5:00 to 7%0G p.m. on weekdays. 6. The total number of students cn site at any one time could i be limit6el. D. TechnicaL,Issues- The Fire District has indicated that the proposed use would classified as a public assembly. Therefore, the applicant would be required to submit plans prior to occupancy for;., plan check to ensure compliance with all State Fire Marshal requirements -(Seu Exhibit "F "). 7II. F,TVIRONMENTAL ASSESS „JNT: (4jWn review of Part I of the Initial Study and completion of Part` •,II of the Environments. Checklist, Ok staff has found no signiftcant. impacts ,related to a dance studio locating within this commercidli center. IV. FSCTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commis;i 1. must make the follooring findings before approving this applica.rion. A. That the propceed use is in accordk=4 with •:he' -Ceneral Plan, the obje»tives of the Development' Code, and th3 pu:;poses of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea. 'in which the site is located; and M. That the proposed use will not be det:rirental to the public henitw, aS e_y, or wel"are or materially .injur,ous to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C. That the proposed use compieo with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: ThL, item has been advertiazd as a ptblic'hearing in the Inland Valley Daily BullaUn newspaper, the property has bean posted, and notices were sent to adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. & —5- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT -,CUP 90 -44 - WEST (BAST PERFORMING ARTS February 27; 1991 Page 5 VI. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission should take public testimony and determine which parking formula should be utilized for. the proposed tenant. If it is determ"4d the use approximate,,,,.' Pp e,J,. a ^Healtk. Studio and Spa, " 'staff would recommend denial of the;:.applicatita�i:. If it is determined that .%e parking` demand :ao.s closely approuimatt.s a "Commercial School;" at" oval is recommsnded with j appropriate conditions to limit the number of studer:�, and faculty. I Z.:af4 will prepare an appropriate Re3olution bared on the Commission's direction. 1 Respect sub - „ r i` ♦r Brad �'r City F+1w ner I BB:BB:sp Attaahmenta: tahibit ^2►" - Applicant's Latter '�hibit "B" - Tenent'a Letter ! - A'xhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibtt `D" - Floor Plan Exhibit "E",- Claus Schedule ExhitAt "F" - Fire District Comments Exhibit "G" - Parking.,Table r WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS S Lest S. . eat Coast Performing Arts in currently located at 5$0 E. Foothill Upland,, CA. We currently teach acting, modeling, and vocal training. We also..- 11 dance suppli4,3,. - Our classes us ;311y have between 6 and 10 students. We -have never had a parking problem'biecause moat of our parents bring the students and then leave and return at the ,end of the cl^xs. Approximately 8c% of our students are under the ase,pf 16 and -do -not drive. Sur hours of operst,on are between 3:30 p.m. to 9 :00 p.m. Monday r - Closed on day a we aye atc,a' open on :Saturday, from 10:30 a.r, to 12 `i,.m , ;. 0.i Class arrival and departure time is 3taggere3 so Chore is no ccnies•tion ' in the office or parking area. .Parents are only allowed to observe the ` .classes on a quarterly bads. Tiny tot classes and ballet are dons in the early classes, jaza in the evening hours aid tap 'luring our late hours, so there is no noise factor.' Tuesday claE3e3 hc+rr been arranged so that families with more than one child taking classes can bring their children at the aama time. Most of our Wednesday students tFke voice and daw ^e,''sc they are -rt the studio for at leaati iwo..houra. Thursday students stay for 3 to 4 hours, so•*aere .a no traffic except for the few drama students that arrive in the �seening. Thank you for your conszderati?..A Floyd 1 tr ows (l Aft Thomas Winery Plaza Foc+thill & Vineyard a Rancho Cucamonga Ja *aary 4, 1991 Ct� CUCAMONGA I 6A Mr. Otto Kroutil Deputy C.* ,y .fanner x City of Rancho CarAmc nga :... P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cumitmonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr, Kroutil: We, the Tenants of 'Thomas Winery Plaza, w,, excited about the' possibility of West Coast Performing arts becoming a part of our center. We wauid like to stmngly' encourage your approval of their Conditional Use Pe..,mit< ' Cats yse would be an asset to the center, to our businesses and te- the overall community e, Rancho Cucamonga hank you for considering ow' request. Sincerely, a Pl:- ? .a ne Farmers. Market Gemme.� . narmagj CA X14 S pl t9 on Thomas "Nine Liquors Ki :ate to -Guar } Dean's Photo � �a Fpt Frame Ms. Fs Qu'ckCuisine Iattie Caesars E While -U -Wait Shoe Repair an Susse t� r Corporate Offices OAS lnvostors • 203113usiness C-niter Drive • Suits 290 • Irvine, CA • 92715 • (714) 833 -:7A, Leising Office: (714) 945 -9712 /� _ g 0 Pi i t llF s jF f� ��;;a�s��P��ss!<a g.� sd �i •� !' b�N• EltiTf {tia a2 aaeaaaaa Hif 2H 4c- ----- i .4 IV;��:i L - -_ •'ZI Mai& 11 `lam .�. t �6fi1 •I ,I I 1 .1 ' -3— �tlrllill �IIIiT i =l I t I It .� + :tit + l l f ARM i�S .� i i CL -- Oil �t 4=: ;T COAST PBiu''ORKING AWS y. SCHk�U1.B MONDAY: Room A Ac-r, .5-6 4:3;9 to 5:00 2 student.+ Privates Host. B A6m' -r- 7 4:00 to 5:30 6 s +,udentcs Jsz:; Room .:' A4 9 -1 5:o0 to 6:00 8 students Ballatti Room B A6s 7 -11 5 -'30 to 7:00 l0 students' Jazz Room A &, i-!g 6:510 to 7:m ,; 6 students Tap t Room B Ai.-e )2 -)q 7100 to F 00 8 students 4azz Room A 4e, " IS -4 7:00 to 8:i0 5 students Jazz R00:1 B 616.= 1.3-16 8:W, to 9:res 7 .students Jazz TUrSDAY: Room A Az.•" -4- 4:00 to 5 :00,,, 7 students Ballet Room B, AC-9 -/-'1 4 :00 to 5Y 30 9 students 3aza Room A Ad X IZ 5:30 to 6 :.l0' 1 Student Private Rtum B A &1 12 -791 5:30 to 7 :00 7 students 1'117. doom 6 ';KGs 12- 7:30 to 8:30 1 student Prime ®te. Room B 4.170y 7:00 8230 9 students Jazz WxZM SDAY: Room A fi4's ;1- q 4:00 to c.:0:n 8 students XMI Room B 4,30 to 5:30 7 students Ballet S, ' Ro 6m A'-' /a6 s 7 -tj 5: o0 to 6:00 -6-student I a Room B AC[' -7-1c 5V' 0 to ,1:00 8 atudg%Ats Ballet Roo m. Room.B , AW At. 7 -' b ij0 to ?•Q> I3 -1S 7.00 to 8x30 7 students 6 students adz Thuraday: Room A P6 7 -1v� 3:30 to 5 :'�W 6 students Jazze ap room B Ads: 11-)3 4:30 tr, 6.bp School Dunce Team (Uglan Room A A6i jo -1& 5:30 to 6:30 7 students Model :g Room B Ai,k 11 -1A 6:00 to 8:30 School Dance Team (UplaF Room A AG. Reis' 600 to 8:30 9 students Drama' Room B-. &npty, `- Frid ay: C1,7sod Saturday: Roem A 061 10 :00 to 11:00 S students Combri %. i Room A NF y -11 11:00 to 19 :30 7 students Coroo t, f t f 4 1 Off ei E I A January 14, 1991 PLAN CHECK REPORT" WEST COAST PERFORM E40 AFTS THOMAS WINERY PLAZA 1. Large dance room is 2580 square feet. Using a factor of 50 square feet per person, the occupant load is 51 persons. This room is an A -3 public assembly. ° ,special exiting requizements apply. Interior finish requirements apply. 2. SmaAl dance room is 1896 square feet. Using a factor of 50 square feet l er person, the . occupant load is 37 persow, This room is a B -2, ordinary business occupancy. 3. Fire extinguishers required. A+iinimum size 2A13BC. i 4. Fire alarm and fire sprinkler requirements as per Foothill Fire District Ordinance IS, 5, Permit required to conduct a place of pr4biic assembly. `there will be a fee for this permit. 6. Emergency lighting re4uired. h 9w Susan D. Wolfe, ?Ok Inspector Sl'3V6i jsz iI Parking Calculations: Type of Square Parking No. of Spaces No. of Spaces Building Use Footage Ratio Required Provided A Restaurant 7,625 1/1000 1/55 (over 6,000 sq. ft,.,) B Retail 13,874 1/L50 56 C Retail 3,975 1/254 16 0 'Retail 22,785 1/250_ 91 Restaurant 5,381 1/100 54 F Retail 7,972 1/250 32 nlst f?.00r) Dance Studio 5,161 1/150 -35 OfficelRetail - 827 1/250 3 (c d fSaor) G Retail 8,710 1/250 35 Aft H Retail 2,902 1/250 1e I Retail., 9,909' 1/250 40 K Restaul�arit 6,000 1/100 <; 60 Retail" ; 4,250 V250 _17 L Retail 729 1/250 3 100,103 544 532 y EXHIBIT "6' 9_6 ;r RESOLUTION N0. r A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C;,TY OF RANCO CLCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONA., USE PERMIT N0, 90 -44 FOR A PERFORMING ARTS SCHOOL IN A L'2ASED SPACE OF 5,988 S.gUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL - CENTER, LOCATED AT 7955 VINEYARD AVENUE, F8 -F13, IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, (SUBAREA 2) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FIND1i ,-5S IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:. 203- 101 -10 A. Recitals: (i) k'est Coast Perfo&ing Arts has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use PermA No. 90 -44 as dec gibed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,, the subject ' Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the applicatl6a." (ii) On February 27 and cor'Anued to March 13, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public trearings on the application and concluded said hearings on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Ass to B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it i., hereby found, determined, and resolved by the PlannS:•', Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows`: This Commission hereby spk�,cifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this'esclution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced -ublic hearings on Fetruarl; 27 and Marc }'13, 1991, including written and oral's_•aff reports, together with public testimony,. -this Commission hereby specifically fiends as follows: (a) The application. applies to property located at the northeast corner of Vineyard AveRuc and Focthill Boulevard with a street . frontage of 1,845 feet and lot deF,,:h of 395 i`eet and is presently improved with ten commercial buildings; and (b) The property to the north and south of the subject site is ;I vacant, the, property to the east_ is a commercial center, and the property to the west is a roller skating rink; ar,d (c) The subject property consists of a variety of uses including restaurants, clothing store, dry cleaner, jewelry ,-tore, and other types of service businesses; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 90-44 - WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS March 13, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific finding^, of facts set fu, th in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows- (a) That the propose' use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Coee, and the purposes of the district in which the sits is located.,., (b) That the pr-oposed use, together with the,.ronditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, �-;Fety, or welfare or materially injurijus to properties or improvements in the vicinity, (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicablie provisions• of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby ,-fi,nds ;nd certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the 'California Environmental` Quality Act of 1970 and, further,_ this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 1, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this AMI reference. Planning Division 1) All recitals shall be held offsite. 2) Special events (such as fund raisers and dances) shall be held after 7 p.m. on weekdays or on weekends at any time: 3) The total number of students on -site at any time shall be limited to 36. 4) If the operation of the facility causes adverse ..- effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including ;but not limited to, noise and/or vibration, the Conditiona+ Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible revocation. 3) "'he facility shall be operated` to comply with the performance standards for noise in commercial and office districts as follows: the activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dBA' during the hoirs of 10 p.m, to 7 a.m. and '65 dFA during the hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION 'RESOLUTION NO, CUP 40 -44 - WEST COAST PERFORMING ARTS March 13, 19i ,r Page 3 6) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform 1oilding, Cijde and State Fire Marshal's regulations have b�ien complied with. Prior to occupancy,` plans shall be ,submitted- to the Rauche Cucamonga ;Fire Protection Distr ct end the Buildinj and Safety Division for review and approval. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occur ancy, 7) Approval of this request shall' not -waive a: compliance with oil sections of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Develppment Code, and all other applicable City ordifdances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED, >AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARC" 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF T:iE CITY OF 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman .ATTEST. Brat Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of,,the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passers,. and adopted by the Planning Commissibr, U-f the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meg,.ing of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1991, by the fe,, *towing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Afth ,a �— CITYOI+ RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT t DATA riarch 13, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRdM:, Barrye'R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: :• Betty A. Miller, A S Engineer t SdBJECT: ENVIRONMENU! APSESSWiNT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL W!, 13693 - LUNA - A subdivislo n o Y:6'acre of—Fa-53-75-2 parcels in the Very Low Residential Development_ District, located on the north side of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue (APN: 201 - 182 -29) I. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the item be continued for two weeks so that the related variance can be reviewed concurrently. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson ;,, Senior Civil Engineer ` BRH•dlw lu -- ---- -- CITi'QF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. STAFF RC, FORT DATE: March 13, 1991 TO r"efman and Mw.bers of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer 4 BY: Ping Kho, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PA►MEL MAP 13782 - CENTER STREET PARTNEP-5 - A subdivision 5f 4.53 aiwes or :and-" nto S- pa� rcl s n the General Industrial District,(Subarea 5) of the Ir�dus{.irial Area. Specific Plan, located at tntiI northeast corner of 7th Street and Center Street - APN: 209 - 251 -1015 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. A4ti'on Reouested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on -hob B. Parcel Size:: Parcel 1 - 1.15 ?.res Parcd, 2 - 1.00 acres Parcel 3 - 2.38 acres- Total Total -4?3 acres-. C. Exisdiq Zoning: General Industrial District (Subarea 5)' D. SurroV, ding -Land Use, North - Exiss.mg industrial Building South - Existing Industrial Building East - Existing Industrial Building Wert - Vacant E. SjrroundMg Le = *ral Plan and Development Code Designations:. North - General Industrial District (Subarea 5) South - Gei,�?al ladustrial District (Subarea 51 East - Inds Strial Park District (Subarea 6) West - GenePal Industrial District (Subarea 51 'F, Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes gent? -;r to the south T-, 'EM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT PM 13782 - CENTER STREET PARTNERS MARCH 13, 1951 PAGE 2- II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of the parcel map is to create 3 parcels for the development of industrial buildings. Development plans for the site are on tonight's agenda as DR 90 -02. The City is proposing to construct a storm drain system along the railroad between 7th Street and 6th Street to mitigate an existing condition along the railroad. In addition, the 7th', Street railroad crossing including crossing signals and crossing gates will be installed to provide a connection of 7th. Street from Center Street to Haven Avenue. No building Permits will be issued for this site until the above improvements are completed. If the Developer cannot wait for the City to construct the storm drain and railroad crossing, then he is required to construct the same at his expense without a reimbursement from the City. It is anticipated that: th,� City will complete its project around October 1992. 111. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The _,.plicant completed Part I of the Initial Stucly. Sta con ucted a field investigation and completed' Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impact%, upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project: - Urtfore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: qw Notices of Public Hearir� have peen sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Inland, #;,11oy Dally Bulletin. Posting i at the site has also been completed, V. RECOMMENDATION : - It is recommended that the Planntng Commission consider a"1i npi —ut 'ann elements of the Tentative Parcel trap 13782. If after such consi'aration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would j be appropriate. Respectful Iy submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer 1rI:PK:jh Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A "1 Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Resolution and Recommended Conditia.;,of Approval �- 2 1.. STREET W 4TH —L—__[_d/STREET it N.T.S. CITE` O : PARCEL MAP 13782- RANCHO CUCAMONGA v i cy N r TY PIA P ENGINILERMG DAM ON EXHHBIr: ='3 t i _ i �j _ u >i _ 11 BUILIIING B "z' ( BUILD T eC7 i LILD!NG µUl ,� `� -- 2.38,dG• f �� • � r. ;. n — Jit — Y T PAACELI BUILDI \G A i -- — — 7TH —S- 0T — CITY OF iii: PARCEL MRP 13782- RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: TENTAT'I v c MAR ENG?��..:.'3G DIYIgI0t3 E.X'rliB?T:�, r 3 -�¢ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION QIF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANC'iO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY V`,vROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 137.2, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 7TH STREET AND CENTER STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS Th'SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 209 - 251 -10 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 13782, submitted by Center Street Partners, aj�plicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3- n- rcnls, the real property situated in the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, CountyYof San Bernardino, State of.- California, identified as APN: 209- 251 -10, located at the northeast corner of Tth Street and Center S':reet; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 1991, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for Lhe above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CCMMI5SI0N RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findiiigsi'1have been tade: 1. That th�:srap is consistent with tN'4General Plan. Awn 2. 'That the improvement ox the proposed subdivision is consiste ,it with the General Plan. j 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and imorovements will not cause substa °itia;l environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1570; and further, this Commission hereby issuer a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 13782 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. The City is proposing to construct the storm drain system along the railroad between 7th Street and 6th Street ane install the railroad crossing at 7th Street, No building permits can be issued for this j rah �S MAI PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TENT PM 13188 - CENTER STREET PARTNERS MARCH 13, 1:991 PAGE 2 site until the above improvements are completed. If the Developer cannot wait for the City to construct the storm drain and railroad crossing, then the Developer shall construct the same at his expense .: without a reimbursement from the City. - 2. Existing Overhead Util.itieS a. 7th Street - An in -lieu fee-,as reimbursement for, the previously undergroundeu overhead utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of 7th Street shall be paid to thy:. City prior to the issuance of - building - permits. The fee shall'- be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length of > the project frontage. b. Center Street - The existing overhead utilities (telecommunic,;tien and electrical) on the project side of 'Inter Street shall be undergrounded ^from the first�'pole on the south side of 7th Street to the first pole off -site north of the project north boundary, prior` to :'-iu�blic 'improvement acceptance or occupancy, ` whichever '`occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future deveiopment (redevelopment) as it occurs on the ,opposite side of the street. 3. Off -site private drainage easement shall be obtained for the ditch and underground pipe along the south side of the adjacent property to the north prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be ` operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of I Determination (NOD) regarding the associy,red environmental action is filed and 'posted with -he Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. AM J� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TENT PM 13782 CENTER STREET PARTNERS MARCH 13, 1991 !AGE 3 In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Gargle Code, or the guiddlines promulgated theraunder, E'.xtept for payment of any required handling charge' for - filing 4 Certificate of FF,. Exemption,., h,Xs condition shall 'be deemed null ano void. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1991. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: N Larry T. MCNiel, Chadmman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of `the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ':•:ertify that the :foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of(,�March 1990, by the following vote-to-wit.- ti AYES: CGMMISSIONE`RS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS:. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r i i j_ f 'L: C e g S W u M C �y i Y J y V O L O r IT r r o a�xva ..�$. Y�+ �a ai d �= S, iry.� E; ;y� M Y° •el C C.w � C °� ♦ g. rr v 24 �� fig` tie ionx° °sag $_m ea dx o- g ss CYb +, p ` r.� 'V Y Yf•� �C .pn EL .. .'. UZ tl S p :s �Yp Y 6 ,,,= r°e QTY ,r ig y a s YY i a o $° u �.1 12 �V gY Q C a N Nad a C � �� S � N` E� E•. Yq cM OT Eg V� � � C p C Y B C A y y L- _ O C 4 O Dua{� OE !S bb W� I Gy X44 O C OuW u �9Y O� ^ti ` y/ V Lno Y a � g w s -a 3 $mom m ��.� • a o $° u �.1 12 �V gY Q C a N Nad c G - C � �� Y — � N` E� E•. Yq cM OT Eg V� � � C p C Y B C A y y L- _ Dua{� OE !S bb W� I Gy y O u ca R 01 0.3 w y/ V Lno M Y q � g w s � 3 $mom t T ��.� • � M ye O v� Y C= L • �C = °4 E°'° Ep7pV �.0, V� 6 �� V•O�utl� O L) «.2 ➢ Y. Y 2 Y YC V 4.� U V V Y Y a o $° u �.1 12 �V gY Q C a N Nad c G - � �� v6 cM OT Eg O � � _ bb W� I \\ i el CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA g STA FF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner DATE: Mar°h 13, 1991 f..; TO: Chairman and Members of "the Plannin rtv=ission g FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -05 - The request to establish a ar.* studio in a�leas�e space of 3, 150 square feet within a;!',existing multi - tenant industrial complex within the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 9495 - 9th Street, Suites 101 and 102 - APN: 209- 032 -24. ; L PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a az�zerciSe dance studio and issuance of a Negative"" Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial buildings General Industrial District (Subarea 3) South - Vacant; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) East - - Industrial buildings; General Industrial District (Subarea 3) West - Single family residence and citrus grove; General Industrial district (Subarea 3) C. General Plan Desi'gnations:. Project Site - General Irdustrfal North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The proposed use is located within an existing n y- eve oped multi- tenant industrial complex. The project site contains two buildings totaling 44,540 squa—ze feet, provides up to 20 tenant spaces, and 111 parking spaces., ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & CUP 91 -05 - JILL BORDATO March 13, 1991 Page 2 AWK E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Dance Studio 3,150 1/150 21 8 F. Applicable Regulations: • The Industrial Specific Plan conditionally permits aerobic dance studios a- a "Recreational Facility" within Subarea 3'. II. ANALYSIS: i A. General; The proposed use - entails the establishment of a T,70- square foot Jazzercise aerobic dance studio within the Cucamonga Industrial Park, located at 9495 9th Street (see Exhibit "D "). Proposed hours of operation through Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 'a.m. and 4,,C''i 'p.m. to 8 :30 p.m. and Saturdays from 7 :30 a.m. to ;10 :30 a.m. Morning and afternoon class sizes are anticipat %d to ayerage 15 to 20 students while evening class, sizes a(0e anticipated, to average 20 to 25 students. Each class will pvovide one instructor. A total of four dance classes are proposed during each weekday, breaking down into one morning and three afternoon /evening classes. The maximum number of employees for day classes,`; two and for evening classes four. B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this type of use within an industrial park setting are compatibility with surrounding uses, availability of parking, and noise impacts. The following sections address and discuss these issues: 1. Compatibility of Uses: The proposed use is located within a currently vacant multi- tenant industrial park. Three tenant uses presently propose to operate within project boundaries. These uses include a bank storage area, body shop, and Dee Dee's Dance Studio (CUP 271 -02 approved by the Planning Commission on February 27, 1991). Because of the types of uses proposed and the number of employees and noise typically associated with them, staff believes that the Jazzercise studio will not create adverse impacts on surrounding uses. Nevertheless, to ensure control over use compatibility the Resolution of Approval contains a condition stating, "If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations including, but not limited to, noise, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commissions for consideration and posse "t termination of the use." -.2 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT l` EA & CUP 91 -05 - JILL BORDATO March 13, 1991 Page 3 2. Availability ` of Parking: This issue concerns the availability of parking and additional circulation demands the proposed Jazzercise dance studio would generate within project boundaries. Parking requirements for this type of use are based upon leased square footage and not upon ,lotentiai occupancy, as in a commercial school. The Development Code requires 21 parking spaces for a gross floor area of 3,150 square feet (1 parking space for each 150 square - feet). The proposed use is located within a 44,540 square foot multi- tenant industrial complex designed at a ratio of one parking space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area providing 111 parking Spaces. Based upon this parking ratio, a total of 8 parking spaces were provided for the 3,150 square feet of tenant space. Therefore, insufficient parking exists for the applicant's desired occupancy. The only way the proposed; use could be permitted would be to limit occupancy during the hours of 8 a.m, to 5 p.m. "Monday through Friday (see Condition 6). In the evening, when other tenants are closed, ample, parking would be available' for the proposed use. 3. Noise impacts: The applicant is proposing tc use a home stereo system with four speakers. Building construction should provide adequate sound attenuation; therefore, no significant noise impacts or conflicts are anticipated by staff. The Resolution of App t,�:, provides two conditions relating to noise attenuation fCondit�ons 2 and 5). C. Fire District Continents: The Fire District conducted a plan check an in ca a at based upon the project °s square footage the use will not be classified as public assembly. However, prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to verify compl %ance with Uniform Fire Code Requirements. III.. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Part I of the Initial Study has been compl ete by a ,app scant. Staff completed Part Il of the Environmental Che iliv,,,t and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the meowing findings before approving this application 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan subarep in which the s,11te is located. fl 3 PLANNIVG COMMISSYON STAFF REPORT EA & CUP 91 -05 - JILL BORDATO i } March 13, 1991 Page 4 Aft 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in'the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been adverts'sed as a public hearing Walley iin the Inlanir Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all prgpetty owners within 300 feet of the project site. - !, VI, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends appkoval of Conditional Use Permit 91-05 ough adoption of the attached Resoiution. Res p lly su Brad ller City Planner BB:TG :js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit 'B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan Exhibit "E" - Fire District Comments Resolution of Approval cr Jill A. pordato Jazzercise February 4, 1591 City of Rancho Cucamonga City Pl ;� 'ping Commission Re: Con4'v`ional Use Permit Pear Sirs or Madams= My name is Jill A. Hordato and I own and operate a Jazzercise franchise in Rancho Cucamonga and ;nave been doing so for the past six years. Jazzercise has been operating in Rancho Cucamonga _a total of'-eleven years and has existed for a total of twenty years. We have approximately 4,000 franchise operator/owners in America, Japan, Canada, and many parts of Europe. My business entails teaching aerobic dance fitness classes to the public. We have students ranging in age from 18 to 70 years. We offer people a place to come where they don't =have to sign a contract or pay a hefty membership fee to join.. All that is required is to purchase classe. All of our music and choreography to the music comes from Jazzercise, Inc., which has its headquarters in Carlsbad, CA. This keeps all of our instructors uniform and safe because we, as individuals, do not make up the routines. All routines from Jazzerr_ise, Inc. are checked by their board of physiologists before we obtain them. Jazzercise is a terrific break from the stresses of life and a great way for people to stay in shape and erajo'y life in Rancho Cucamonga. We are a darce aerobics center th�'t cares about k,eping its Rancho Cucamonga atudents haopy. Many pc?pple depend on us for their fun and fitness. The location I have chosen is central to the different areas of Rancho Cucamonga. The cost is very reasonable and the space is larger than`,�where I am currently located here in Rancho Cucamonga. The park itself is snialler.. However, it meets and exceeds all of my needs. As my current lease is up, I feel it is a good and appropriate time to make this move to a new location within the city itself. The number of employees on the largest shift would be four (4). Our hours of operation would be Mon.- Fri -.= 9 :00a.m. - 10 :30 a.m. Mon.- Fri. 4:00 p.m.- 8:30 p.m. Sat. 7:30 a.m.- 10:30 a.m. The average class size for the morning classes is 15 -20 for the evening cla>ses is 20 -25, and for the Saturday classes is 15 -20. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this application for a conditional use permit (CUP). IW MARM VIuM�& O Kindest regards, Sill A. Bordato (714) 987- 9613 I - MAE. -�- i Kasrlr .e.�.+ i rrEns moo' ' OF RANCHO', UCAMONGA TrrI.E. + PLANNlri DMSION 1V n Y I EXHIBIT: SCALE: 1 <- 7 F �W .•. ITEM CITY OF 1 C" ' {?° AMs3IVGA TITLE: t N PLAPII°:T&Ot D 'JISION EXHIBM �y SCALE: �"r 4 O Ll 4 4 p +' � � 4 d �■ Pf�� ir.Y�� F �W .•. ITEM CITY OF 1 C" ' {?° AMs3IVGA TITLE: t N PLAPII°:T&Ot D 'JISION EXHIBM �y SCALE: �"r �Im it AY ITEM: ° OF i CH(O. G`U�C;AMONGA TITLE: cell PLANJ, DF`JYSIOI�1 i N EXHIBIT: t� SCALE: K - J' PLAN CHECK REPORT Till A: Bordato Jazzercise Ninth Street February 12. 1991 i OW11 1, NO scale on flow Plan. Using approximate measurements of 51' .i 't x 51', the useable floor area is 2601 square feet. This space is 'o +COL divided byrn factor of So squarr feet er F parson. which results ��in an occupant load of 52 persons. Mgl� 2. Based on above Occupant load, this is a public assembly. A U , A erctit will be„ mquirtd. A tee will: be charged. ( 3. panic hardriare is required o',, 2 of the exit doors. it is ecommended the 2' front. >3oors be used. The spacing is r correct. bard on the mv.itirements shown on the plan. 4. t (one) rite extinpr aker is acceptable. Minimum size must be 2Al0BC. ft/f& 5. Any wz'V'or window coverings must meet State Fire Hishal G32�lt pDwal w spread radngs: Specify what coverings will be used. 022}St $ ' An exact floor plan with all measurements is requested. It is Plow Rty, 'Paw possible this occupancy may not be a public assembly, however, . until we hope information to indicate otherwise, this `will be classified as a Fublic assembly. 0x: g91 t�•tt7�. The applicant's current occupancy is not approved for public ve nie ale! a' assembly use. We have written notices from more than a year ® ago requesting compliance. We have not received cooperation. y -r7t. Reuaa2� C. Fire deptrtmrtt does not approve nor,.reccmmend approval of daawt.y aevw,rad this new loo tion 'until there is a cl8w�, agreement from Ms r2%,:.yt1 tmcm Sordt:.to . on her responsibility for complio&,c with fire code QJt f, requirements. Susan D. Wolfe 02 -12 -81 tot �; (! J ' c `�1 . 4 v AM are tM k d 1I AM RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT No. 91-05 FOR THE REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A DANCE STUDIO IN A LEASED SPACE OF 3,150 SQUARE FEET WITHIN .N EXISTING MULTI - TENANT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 9495 9TH STREET, SUITES 101 AND 102,; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 209- 032 -24. A. Recitals. M Jill Bordato has filed an application for the issuance o;`; Conditional Use Permit No:. 91 -0E as eescribed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the appl ;ication.° (ii) On the 13th daj of March X991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a .duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites pr1or to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial ev?dence presented to this Commis ion during the above - referenced public hearing on March 13, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Cormnission hereby specifically finds as follow:;: (a) The application appl3_s to property located at 9495 9th Street with a street frontage of 375 feet and lot depth of 300 feet and is presently improved with two industrial buildings totaling 44,540 square feet and 111 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north and east of the subject site contains industrial buildings, the property to the south is vacant, and the property to the west contains a single family residence; and (.c) The application proposes to offer Jazzercise ;azn ^mi classes between the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 8;3u j"fd. Monday through F -iday and 7:30 a.m, to 10:30 a.m. on Saturdays.- L ';i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91 -05 - JILL BORDAT0 March 13, 1951 Page 2 3. Based upon,the ,ubstantial evidence presented to this`Gommission during the above -refs eniee'pnblic hearing and ui;on the specific findings of facts sLt forth in paragya,.i's I and 2 above; this C emission hereby finds and q concludes as follows: (a) That the prepored use is in accord with the C.heral Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. ;{ (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be';detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to propef-ties or° improvements in�;the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies'with each of the applicable pro;:isions cif the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies, that the project has been reviewed and consiiered icy compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration., -- S. Based upon the findings, and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this;Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference. 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all other City ordinances. 2) If operation;` of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations including, but not limited` to, noise, the Cpnditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideratio�,'and possible termination of the use. 3) Occupancy 01 the facility shall not commence until ` such time A all Uniform Building ode and Uniform Fire Cade regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupan':y,'hians shall be Submitted to ;the Rancho Cucamongai0ire Protection District and 4-he Building and Safety, Division to sh rw compliance. `The building shall be inspected fnr compliance prior to occupancy. 4) Any sign proposed for the facility ,shall be designed in confo,,�ance with the comprehensive Sign Ordinance, any, Uniform Sign Program for the complex, and shall require review a��: _.,proval by the Planning Division prior to installation. Afth PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 91 -05 - J',' :%L BORDATO March 13, 1991 Page 3 AIM 51 The facility sh�'1 be operated in conformance with the performance 'standards for Subarea 3, including, but not limited to, noise levels. 6) Attendance of Jazzercise dance classes,between 8 a.m. and 5 -p.m. on weekdays shall be limited to a maximum of 8•` "people, including all employees. Attendance on w '. d eek,.n s and weekday classes before 8 ay a.m, and after 5 p.nA. are limited to the maximum occupancy approved by tkN1..Fire District.. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the aa;fgtion of this; - Resolution. tt APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY- �IZ,,tARCH•1991, PLANNING COMMISSION Of TAE CITY Gf ►WHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry _ T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST• Brad Buller, Secretary i I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of 'Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1991, -,by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: fir � "'OMMISS:ONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONER:* _ , h� Lewis Hoy ;' - 1Vlan.agement Corp. J 1156 North Mountain,, I'M 1 P.O_ Box 6701 Upland, California 91785 714/985 -0971 FAX: ` 141981 -9799 �iR q 3 19M A PM �►��9tl0�llilZy�i213ta.i�t� ��, March 12 1991 I I <` Mr. Brad Buller City Planner City of Rancho 'Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -0807 RE: PLANNING COMMISSION Dear Mr. Buller:' to our telephone conversation today Pursuant March 11, I am p ,, requesting ,a continuance of the Item scheduled for irhe Planning 1991 ' '. Commission tomorko4l, March 13, A ril 10.until p , I appreciate your assistance in this matter. If you have any questions, please give me I') call. Sincerely, r rl1,UtlaL�{ Richard A. Magerd5 d '1Executive Director { C Development RAM :cs r, i� I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT' DATE: March 13, 1991 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy. Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO TOWN CENTER PHASING PLAN: - WESTERN PROPERIIES Consideration of amending_ the 'phasing plan ,for Terra Vista Town Center, located at the northeast `,corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (reference Conditional Use Permit 88 -12) - APN: 1077 - 421 -05, 06, and I I. BACKGROUND: On November 30, 1988, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution 88 -236, approving the original phasipg plan for the Terra Vista Town Center subject to specified (,6gditions. On December 14, 1988, the phasing plan was modified bj�the'Commission at the request of the apples - -Through this modification, three significant pieces of art were ,Mded_as part of t ))e phasing plan requirement. On March 14, 1990'f at the request-_nfl the applicanf,,.i the phasing was again modf.ied by the Commission. The modification pertained to the switching of buildings between i Phase II and Phase III and expanding the Phase II development area. On July 25, 1990, the Commission approved its latest revision to the phasing plan for Town Center as :outlined in the attached Resolution No. 88 -2360. This modification requirred that Bui`�ings E, G. J, R, Q, and Pad 1 be under substantial construction prior to the release of the last one -third (33 percent) of the toti,�.=- gross floor area of Buildings A and B for occupancy and be under substantial construction prior to issuance of building permits for Phase IF.I development. II. ANALYSIS: The applicant is now requesting relief from Condition 4 of Resolution No. 88 -236C requiring buildings E, G, J, R, and Q and Pad 1 be under substantial construction prior to release of the last one - third` of the total gross floor area of Buildings A and B for occupancy in order to allow the opening of 'Big 5 - ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES March 13, 1991 Page 2 Sporting Goods located within Building A. Tenant improvements are underway for Big 5. Sporting Goods_ At this time, Pad 1 (Chili's Restaurant) and Building J (Ross) have been finaled and Buildings G. R, 3nd 0 are under substantial construction. Construction of Building E has not begun due to a property line _conflict with Mervyn's. When the Parcel Rap' or Town Center was recorded, the parcel line along the east sidO of Mervyn's was inadvertently shown 4 feet further to the east, thereby running through a portion of Building E. Because 06,,flniform Building Code does not permit the construction of a bui'.ding across property lines, Construction of Building E can notfcommence. Lewis Homes and Mervyn's have been negotiating ove✓ Ile course of the last several months to complete the lot line 4?dstment. In anticipation of resolving this issue, Lewis Nom�is .,has stock piled building materials on the site and has a r+iumter of tenants for Building E. At this time, however, a resoli�)cion "to the lot line conflict has not been accepted by Mervyn' s'ai,d Lewis Homes (see attached letters). In addition to the Big 5 Sporting Goods suite, there are five other suites within Buildings A and 3 that have not been released for occupancy. These suites include two in Building A (1,060 and 1,164 square feet in area) and three suites within Building B (1,261, 1,250, 1,313 square feet in area). Should the Commission decide to eliminate the condition in its entirety, these suites would become available for occupancy. While the applicant is only requesting modifici`Lion to one condition at this time, Western Properties (Lewis Homes) will be requesting additional modifications to the phasing plan. As mentioned in their letter (Exhibit "A" attached), modifications to conditions connected with the occupancy of Major 3, 4 'and /or TPit will be requested in the near future. There are design issrles related to these conditions that will be addressed prior to(�'the public hearing. = \•\ It's been the Commission's desire that the Terra Vista Town Center develop as a well planned, well balanced, quality shopping center in the City's emerging downtown. In staff's view, the intent of the phasing plan and its requirements were to ensure that goal. Attached for your consideration is a chart outlining the phasing plan conditions of approval contained in Resolution 88 -2366C and the status of related items (see Exhibit "E!'). The Commission should consider all pertinent information about the project and determine if, by providing flexibility for the occupancy of buildings A and B, this goal is being maintained. L -2 LZ M, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES March 13, 1991 Page 3 �1 AM r' III., RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that. the Planning Commission consider all input on the request to amend the phasing plan for Z , the Terra Vista Town Center. If after considering all input, the (( Planning Commission determines that modif;�,',dtion to the phasing plan is acceptable, adoption of the attached) Resolution would be appropriate. i _ Respec ly ;sub 'tted;' ? /Brad u le City Planner BB:SM:mlg " -' Attachments: "All- Exhibit " A Letter from Lewis Homes Alk Exhibit "B" - Letter from Mervyn's "C" Exhibit - Resolution No. 88 -2630 Exhibit "D" -,Phasing Plan Exhibit "E" - Status of Conditions of Approval Resolution of Approval U I �� I Levis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain Avenue! P.Q. Box 674 ( Upland, California 91785' 7141985.0971 FAX: 7141981 -4759 February 22, 1991 Mr. Sco'ct Murphy City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 1500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Amendment to Phasing Plan for CUP 88 - 12, Terra Vista Town Center Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Scott, As you know from our meeting of February 4th, we are not willing at this time to proceed with the following buildings at the Terra Vista Town Center, due. to present economic conditions and oUr lack of committed tenants: Building "M" Buildings "X" and "Y" "Major 4 Pad Buildings "8" and "P11 Restaurant Pads 11211, 113t1, and "4" It is our intention to compete Montgomery Ward and their TBA building, as well as buildings R -1, R -2, and t. as quickly as possible. In addition, subject to resolving the encroachment problem with Mervyn's, we intend to complete building E immediately, for which as you know -,;;' have had all materials stockpiled at the site since last November. With the completion of these buildings, which is curr_ntly scheduled for September of this year, the project wil- be approximately eighty (80) percent completed. As you will see from the enclosed drawing we are proposing to complete the pedestrian link to connect building L and the Montgomery Ward TBA, as well as enclosing the pad for building X and Major 4 behind an eight (8) foot high wall. Our intention is to paint graph:.cs on the wall to match the center in both style and color. You will also see on the enclosed that we intend to install the tree wells, and plantings, that are part of the approved Phase L_ -�"-/ Mr. Scott Murphy February 22, 1941 Page Two III site work drawings. You should note however that we would propose that portions of the pedestrian link be temporary, to be replaced with the approved paving when we build Major 4 and building M. Scott, the most urgent issue is the resolution by the planning commission of the CUP with regards to the opening of Big 5 in the "All building at Town center., You will note from the enclosed letter from Ignacio Gomez at'Mervyn's the current status of the E building encroachment problem. We need the Planning Commission to relax the CUP requirement that the E building be under "substantial construction" prior to opening Big 5. For your information, we expect to have the Big 5 tenant improvements done by the end of March. With regards to the balance of the_yuildings, r`�iative to the CUP requirement with regards to the opening of Montg-`mery Ward, we need your help in explaining ;the current realities of -�•, situation to the Planning Commission so that they will relax the conditions relative to the Ward opening. we would very much like to meet with the Planning Commissioners individually to ,explain the situation and answer their questions prior to a ptalbli�,c hearing, so as to avoid a confrontation at a public hearing, as we are unable to build these buildings on a speculative basis in the current economic enviranment. Aincerely yours, ch el . sl o rcia n Project Manager MLL:cs Enc. cc: Rick Mager, Don Thompson, Ken Corhan, Joe Oleson I' L-5 FbBt -!t` brand fax transmittal Tsno ib?f n AN-ERVY" February 21, 1991. �' ?�� -t7`�� f"" +' If 729•�'��• f VIA FAX #714/949-6725 Mr. Kan Corhan LawiB Rome9 1136 N. Mountain Avenue P. O.aox 670 Upland, CA 91785 RS: Rancho Cucamonga, CA near Ken: This letter serves to inform you that ,Mervyn* a does not want Lewis k30m..es to stgrt constriction of the proposed building the east of our store: until such time as the propogerl lot line adjustment is finalized and the REA, Amendment reflecting this adjustment and the revised site plan is executed. Sincerely Snio Senior G e slopment Administrator Ii /ec corhan.ltr cc: Vic 3teghens Bob Gonella III I I I -� AM /9/s :e s ?1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -236'C A RESOLUTION OF THE PLARNT.;u COMMISSr.Y OF TPE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, -CALIFORNIA, AMENDING-'THE REQUIREMiNTS OF THE PHASING PLAN FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -12 '! FOR TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, AN INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SHOPPING 'CENTER ON 71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER' -OF HAVEN AVENUE AND FOOT.ILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077 -421- 05, 06, _ AND 18 A. Recitals. (i) On the 30th of November 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 88 -235 approving "a phasing plan for the Terra Vista TownCenter subject to specified conditions. (ii) Western Properties has filed a 'request to modify the phasing,, plan for CUP 88 -I2 as described in the title of this Resolution. _ (iii -} On the 25th of July 1990 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a_meeting on the request and concluded said meef;ng on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have oc,,urred. i B. Resolutinn. NOW, THEREFORE, it is he; eby found, deterntirrted, `and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby-'specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cotanission during the above - referenced meeting on July 25, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fnilows: (a) The application applies to property located at 'he northeast corner of Haven Avenue And Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of ±2,700 feet and 10t depth of ±i,440 feet and is a shopping center presently under construction; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant lond, the property tr, th4 .south of that site consists of an office complex, the property to the east 3s vacant land, and the property to the west is an I' entertainmentfoffice complex. i PLANNING COMMISSION 01.c',*T?ON NO. 88 -236C AMEND. -'- PHASING PLAN FOR;fiUP 88 -12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES July 25, 1990 ' Page 2 n 3. Based upoC the substantial evidence presented to this; Commission during the abr±ve- referenced meeting and upon, the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conclude_ as follows: (,a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the Terra: Vista Planned Community, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district -ir. which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions > applicable thereto, will, not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements- in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Corrnunity. 4. This C- mmission herph.,y finds and certifies that the project has J been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission issued a _Negative Declaration on April 27, 1988. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2. 8, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: (a) Perimeter landscaping including sidewalk, shall be provided 'Avenue, along Haven Town Genter Drive, Foothill Boulevard, and Spruce Avenue at the time of Phase I improvements. (b) Thr building pad area for Major 2 and adjacent retail shops shall be temporarily irrigated and planted with groundcover if the building permits ft- Major 2 and adjacent retail have not been issued prior to the occupancy of Major 1 and adjacent retail shops. (c) All conditions of approval as contained in Resolutions 88- 75 and 88 -118 shall apply,. (d) The existing traffic signal at Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be modified and upgraded. ('e) Construction shall proceed in conformance with the approved phasing plan attached hereto as Exhibit "D``' and incorporated' by this reference, and described, in part, below: (1) Phase I shall include completion of Haven / Fcothill corner treatment, including the fountain and trellis, prior to occupancy of Major 1- -' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -236C AMEND. OF PHASING•,PLAN FOR CU July 25, 1990 P 88 -12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES Page: 3 .,fdings A -1, A -2, and 3 shall be under s,;ustantial construction prior to occupancy of Major 1. (3) Buildings X and Y shall be, submitted for bulldino ,:permits prior to' occupancy of Major 1. (4) Buildings E. G, J. R, Q, and Pad I shall be unde±• substantial construction prior to he release of the last one -third (33 F.'ercen,�) of the total gross floor area of Buildings A & B for occupancy (previously recommended condition), (5) Buildings E. G, J, R, Q, and Pad 1 shall be under substantial construction prior,to issuance of building permits•for Phase III development. (6) Major 2 the westerly plaza shall be completeS' concurrently as Phase LI. j (7) The ` theatre shall be under substantial i construction prior to release of occupancy or Building J (Ross). (8) Buildings X. Y. K -1, K4, L, acid M shall be completed prior to occupancy for Major 3, 4, and /or TBAG building, whichever occurs First. (f) Buildings S and P and Pads 2 and 3 shall be under substantial construction prior to occupancy of Majors 3 and /or 4, whichever occurs first. (g) Three significant works of art shall be played in the three major plaza areas, as follows: ( ) One at the Foothill /Haven corner plaza, to be installed prior to occupancy of Major 1. (2) One in the plaza area between Majors 1 and 2, to he installed prior to occupancy of Major 2. r. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -236C AMEND. OF PHASING PLAN FOR CUP 88 -12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES July 25, 1990 Page 4 (3) One in the plaza adjacent to the movie theatres, to be .installed prior to occupancy of,the theatres. (h) Buildings 9 -1 and K -2 and the Prase III parking area can be included in Phase II„ (i) Buildings K -1 and K-2 shall be reviewed at the same time by the Design Review Committee, fi, The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. r APPROVED AND ADD`PTED THIS 25TH DAY OF 'JULY 1990. PLANNING COMM SION OF THE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. ` dh? 1 e ry c 1, Ch "rman' + f ATTEST: . Ot Kr util,, epuiy Secretary I, Otto Kr o til, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the - foregoing Resolution was duly and regulrr�ly introduced, passed, and,;adopted by the Planning Commission of the 0* of Rancho Cucamonga„ at a reguiar meeting of the Planning Commission hel ' O)I -ehe 25th day of July 1990 by the following vote -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE . � x,ffeQ/7"' NI ® R to L � eat C'w= I �4 i Fn Ask '�- � ti i�x tasie�as��, CG 42! C7 F �1 5 3" O � g a tt00 U ill V Si e �a V O .. � .a F� a cli eps. � oa e N p ai cli •� w ca a •� � r � 1D Fy lop u •e Rime .e B c > e � fdA ba a�•O~ S ri ri .c •� C74 V a vi 3" O � g a tt00 U ill V Si e �a V O .. � .a F� a cli eps. '3 ez w bo ca WWI u A v� c„ a a q � p + C e v 'a � � vi •a a �® � 0 w � e y ti .d oq � at •a y ►7 a U 4011 pa o � 00 m 3 L'I'll. LM Im � oa e N cli w ca a •� � r � 1D Fy u •e u � e '3 ez w bo ca WWI u A v� c„ a a q � p + C e v 'a � � vi •a a �® � 0 w � e y ti .d oq � at •a y ►7 a U 4011 pa o � 00 m 3 L'I'll. LM Im N G ip: O C C a! c Cd a' v y d y Q fR v Ali A a 8.8>° V3 `"a .o�55aag1?51 v 3 Sa c C •y1 q G- /3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -236D A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PHASING PLAN FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -12•;, FOR TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, AN INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SHOPPING CF-,TER ON 71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST'- :ORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1'077 -421- - 05, 06, AND 18. A. Recitals, (i) On the 30th of November 1988, the Planning <Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 88 -236 approving a, ,phasing plan for the Terra Vista Town Center subject to specified conditions. Western Properties has filed a 're,"vest to modify the phasing plan fort Conditional Use Permit 88 -12 as described in the title of this Resolution. (iii) On the 13th of March 1991, the Planning Coirmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing cn the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to -this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on March 13, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 12,700 feet and lot depth of 11,440 feet and is a shopping center presently tinder construction; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant land, the property to the south of that site consists of an office complex, the property to the east is vacant land, and the property to the west is an entertainment /office complex. PLANNING COMMISSION RFSOLUTION'NO. 88 -236D CUP 88 -12 - WESTERN P(," R T I ES March 13, 1991 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comnission during, the above - referenced public hearing and upon, the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the Terra Vista Planned Community, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (b) That the proposed use, toge� fir with the conditions, "r"e applicab thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the 1, vicinity; and -� (c) That the proposed use complies rith each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Plar.ned Community. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that theiproject has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission issued a Negative Declaration on April 27, 1988. 5. Based upon the findings, and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, thfi Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: (a) Perimeter landscaping including sidewalk shall be provided along Haven Avenue, Town Center Drive, Foothill Boulevard, and Spruce Avenue at the time of Phase I Improvements. (b) The building pad area for Major '2 and adjacent retail ::hops shall be temporarily irrigated and planted with groundcover if the building permits for Major 2 and adjacent retail have r ^t been issued prior to the occupancy of Major 1 and adjacent retail shops, (c) Ail conditions of approval as contained in ).utions 30 -75 and 88 -118 gall apply. (d) The existing traffic signal at Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be modified and upgraded. (e) Construction shall proceed in conformance with the approved phasing plan attached hereto as Exhibit "D ", and incorporated by this reference, and described, in part, below: (1) Phase I shall include completion of Haven /Foothill corner treatment, including the fountain and trellis, prior to occupancy of Major 1, E Z_ _i5- li` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-236D CUP B8 -12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES March 13, 1991 Page 3 (2) Buildings A-1, A -2, and B shall 'ne ender - substantial construction prior to occupar y of Major 1, (3) Buildings X and Y shall be submitted for building permits prior to occupancy of Major 1. (4) Buildings E, ,9.J, R, and Pad 1 .shall be under substantial construction prior to issuance of building permits for Phase III development. (5) Major 2 and the ►resterly plaza shall be completed concurrently as 'Phase Ii. (6) The theatre shall be under substantial construction prior to the release of 1' occupancy for 9uildi'ng J (Ross). (7) Buildings X, Y, K -1, K -2, L, and M shall be_ completed prior to occupancy for Major 3, 4, AGEL and/or TBA building, whichever occurs first. (8) Buildings S and P and Pads 2 and 3 shall be under substantial construction prior to occupancy of Majors 3 and /or 4 whichever occurs first. (9) Buildings K -1 and K -2 and the Phase III parking area can to included in Phase II. Buildings K -1 and K -2 shill be reviewed at the same time by the Design Review Committee. (f) Three significant work: ''�5 art shall"'be placed in the three major, plaza areas, as follows: (1) One at the Foothill /Haven corner plaza, to be installed prior to occupancy of Major 1. 1_'% (2) One in the plaza area between Majors 1 -and 2, to be installed prior_to occupancy of Major 2, (3) One in the plaza adjacent to the movie . theatres, to be installed prior to occupancy of the theatres. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Z_ -/6 PLANKING COMMISSION °RESOLUTION NO. 88 -236D' CUP 88 -12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES March 13, 1991 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADC?TED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1941. _. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGtZ BY: Larry T. McNiel, Cha irman ATTEST- Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad ,Bulls,,; Secretary of theme Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 'r' hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly i,,&oduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ra tho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1991, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: f- NOES: COMMISSIONERSt ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C �) I„ I z— T1% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .:DATE: - March 13, 199L,_j TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commiss %on FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner SUBJECT: MULTI- FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENTS I. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: On February 26, 1991, the City Council approved the attached Resolution of Intent regarding the future development of multi - family projects. As staff mentioned at the February 27 1991, P`tanning Commission meeting, we anticipate the amendment process to follow three separate tracks: 1. Future unit reductions by reducing the amount of vacant multi - family land in the General 2. Upgrading the City's development and--design standards throb ^h,a package of amendments to the Development Code and to specific and community plans. 3. Upgrading the City's property maintenance regulations through a package of amendments to the Municipal Code. Attached are schedule outlining the program and ,`processes involved in each track. Suggestions from Commis ion members regarding the process are encouraged. Resp ly s ted, Brad u ler Cit Planner BB:LJH %jfs Attachments: €xhibit "A" - City Council Resolution 91 -060 Exhibit "B" - MP3 ti- Family Land Use Amendments Exhibit "C" - Milti- Family Design Standards Exhibit "D" - Multi- Family Property Maintenance ITEM M. S ... THE GMMRAL PLAN, DV=MNWT DI=CTS, SPECIFIC AND amwiTy Puts cny-WIDE TO RWJCE WM T07ZL AnYiNr • K7-TnmE Fx= f S. C h . • Y• • 11 IIt THE C3*UaTY AND 70 MODIFY i t CITY'S DEVEEDPHWT, l ]•. C. AND PROPERTY KaJNMM= SVMMW To p"= 1I MNG A. i, (i) Tim Rancho Oux2mcciga City Council requested in 3.989 that the City staff begin to research and rte, periodically to this Council on the status of residential devielqPwnt within the Community.. (ii) At regularly scheduled meetings of May 17, 1989, August 2, 1989, June 20, 1990 and special public Workshops on August 9, 1990 and January 31, 1991, the City Council ;reviewed City staff's analysis of the potential future residential develapwit based on current vacant uncommitted, residential aim and allocable unit densities and recevsd public testimony the (iii) iwbers of the City Coomra toured various multi- family cc 1plexes in th@ City prior to the January 3.L.' 1991 wmitsihop to determine the effectivenew of land use and design standards quality of the � housing shock. in iap¢nving the. B. B22211WIM. NOW, TEEoUElCRE the City CbU n=il of the City of Rancho Cu== ga does here � by find, e-MlI a and resolve as follows: 1. Mis CO ncil sPecifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A ", Of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon afttaft W informtion to this Canned at the above -refer public meetings, and taws including written and oral staff ruts, together with public twAi=riy, this Council hereby specifically finds an follows: (a) That the Camunity's citizens have voiced concerns srnar the incr1f ti develapcent of multiple family units and decreasing rnm2mrs of single family unit devalcp=ts which is gradually ChangiM the community's residential character and resulting in significant increases in vehicle traffic volumes, increased demo an City saraices, and overeswrling inn local schools. (b) That City Cba Cil members haws voiced concern over the az quality of design and level of mintenance an various multi- family projects throughout the City hstic h can negatively affect- the general quality of the cnnnmtity's housing stock. it Resolution No. 91 -060 Page 2 (c) , Miat the future level of multiple family unit development is can be e3q=ted to increase significantly based upon the amount of avai' able 'accent unocmmitted multiple family land in the City. (d) That rude increased deve opent of residential units can only intensify the Problems associated with the items of oanoern listed In Paragraph B.2 (a) of this Re sob!itio;n. (e) That a decrease in the residential units ant cipatcd at build -but in tho community will help to lessm the ne gative effects of thaw items listed in paragraph B.2(a) of this Resolution. (f) That decreasing the amount of vacant u� rmitted: multiple family land by changing its use designation to sin7rle family lam will result in fewer total anticipated units. (g) Miat decreasing the total hdAd -cut residential unit teat will nut necessarily hinder th City's housirj program which allocate funds for develcpment and mVrovement of new and mustinq h=%, -,g stock. (h) Miat same existing residemial land nay be better slated for non-residential purposes based upon existirra Coal Plana policies and generally accepted land. use principals. (i) That improvener►ts in the city's development, design, and F op Y maintenance Standards can have a positive igMt by ensuring that future multi- family units will enhance the g wwal, quality of the housing stock. 3. Based upon the substantial w idence presorted to the Council during the public meeting and upon specific: facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council find, and concludes as follows: (a) Mat this Council determines that a re&=ticn in the anticipated total housing unit count will lewen the negative effe.^ts from residential growth in the community; and (b) Mat Multiple family brae providw, a significantly lamer amount of residortiat units per acm grin single family lard; and (c) Mzt a reduction in vacant multiple family aceage would provide the moxt effective method to reed uoe tine total residential unit =wrt at build -out; and (d) Mat this Council uacil directs the Plarurirg C =iissian to develop re '""`°* ,t3aces tc rOd the cmnmity's a==t and density of vacant multiple family laud thxoto the City's fareml amendraeitt grooms for the General Plan, Develcpmmt Aistrict Map, Erb and& SPxific Plan, Vcoth ll SWific Plan, and the areas north of and adjacent to Basle ins- Road within the Victoria Planned Catty to erasure, at this City's build-out, a 32 tee 35 m-3 Resc. -,7z' -a No. 91-060 Page 3 AMh 11 RW Percent ' '-,1tiple family unit ratio when =q=W with all ether rrntsing unit . types is this 02ur cil s preference that multi familjz7evelogaerit be limited to a goal of 32 pint of the total units at build -out. Ps a goal the Camcil recognizes that rezonIM decislam based o3 land use PL=drrj,.principals may result in a °atic up to 35 generally , (e) That in the amendmant p er, the Planning Omnissieni will investigate all vacant ur=mmitted multiple family land for potential land use charge to less densta Multiple family designations, single family designations, and other Harr -resu antial designaticns w d which M47 be ate an a site by site basis; and (f) That the Plann11Y3\COMission shall [dwml , tc., � ,s �1 xeac[, rr7atlity of `future Mati -family design standards t° }�3h lity Y groj. to upgrade the (5) That the Planning shall deve,1cp motions P 'Y mainvenanoe to ensure the IMV term of existing and future multi- family developments. quality (h) Tha the Plannirg awmission shall develop remmerlatiam mapaa far phasing multi- family devielopoent W+ il anticipaterl }wild -cut thxeby help lessen the negative effects of;'.,those items listed in paragr B.2(a) of this Rasoluticn. (i) The the City Council' determines F¢rPt eniactment of the aforcem enticM d goals and amenIments to the residential development prc- -- ss is essential 1% assuring existing and fUtI .multi °family develcpments high quality in the C=nuiityls housing stcdc. ` 4. Tine City Clerk shall certify to the adq:�Cicn of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADMYM tbIs 26th day of FWzuaty, 1y31. AYES: Alexander, :BuquOt, 5tcut, Williams, Wright NOES: NCIna ABSFNP: 23sv9e' L. Stout, Mayes, M —' MULT14AMILY LAND USE AMENDMENTS Background: As a result of staff analysis during t;he City Council's recent study, it bec,,:,a, apgarent that the method which would most reduce the number of future mul._,.;family units would be by rezoning much of the vacant multi -,_, family land. Therefore, the portion of the multi - family project directed coward future unit reduction will involve numerous General Pian, Development District, and Communi't Plan Amendments. Strat_'M: Since the General Plan land use de5i;iations ,determine the appropriate zoning classif`i'cation, all of the land to be reviewed will need a General Plan Amendment to be changed. Because of the large number of , parcels, anticipated in the review, staff believes th(.t proposed amendments should be phased over a 9 -12 month` period. Also,'it is appropriate to use the "planning areas" used in the initial steady -as a basis for each phase. cheduling: If the Planning Commission concurs with this approach, staff would, °recommend the fallowing schedule: I. Second 1991 GPA Cycle (May 22, 1991) All of the Etiwand, recommendations for amendments. This area is suggested to go first because the Etiwanda Specific Plan provisions encourage the least amount of development; therefore, this is where the majority „of the vacant Medium land is located. Th_re are approximately 50 separate parcels (180 acres) which' would be involved in the recommendations for review of this area. , 2. Third 19 91 GPA Cycle (September 25--=1991) - All, of the Victoria recommendations, north of and adjacent to Base' Line Road, for aw�endments. This area is suggested for the second review because of the neighboring citizens' 'concerns about increased multi - family developmert_. There would be approximately 27 separate parcels (161 acres) ii.voived in the recommendations for review of this area. 3. First 1992 GPA Cycle (January 1992) - All of the general City recommendations for amendments. This area is recommended at this time because the properties which will be considered are widely disbursed; therefore, an area -wide - analysis for the land' use changes would, not be possible as in Victoria and Etiwanda. A longer perioc, of review and report preparation may be needed and should begin along with the third cycle review of Victoria. There would be approximately 12 -15 separate par ° -els (46 acres) involved in vhe recommendations for review in this area. It is estimated that about half '4.. a:u associate planner's and half an assistant planner's time should be allocated for this project. �i MULTI- FAMILY DESIGN STANDARDS r Background: Included; in the City Council's .multi - family policy direction was a desire to have the Planning Commission and staff work to "upgrade the City's development and design, standards to ensure high of future quality mul,"fi- family projects.",--A signi °ficant ,;art of th�J Council's concern revorss around how we!' )the' uesign of multi- family developments can be made to relate more favorably to nearby single family projects. Strategy; Current Planning staff, with Nancy Fon;'as project manager, will analyze current standards, together with th'� past practices "and . policies of thy: Planning Commission, to develop a package of amendments to upgrade multi'- family standards. Staff halieves that co- ,.current amendments to the Development Code, Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans, and <.:tiwanda and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plans will be necessary. j Schedule: It is anticipated that we will have completed our analysis and be able to present tneramendment package to the Planning .Commission for public hearings at their second meeting in April. A more detailed schedule is attached. I j �r W j i JM 11 YA 11 It 7 II C _ 0 a a a u ii( �.9: w u an aMM �u 011 044 4J k NII�II H iill it II +CiG >7 tl$ tm is a it C 1 0 4 0 (D • h Ii j 44 N 14 .0 p u If B n+ G• II n N Boa ii ii as cam. 41 40 co N It is ,U t0 O v 01 x 4J W N 6 U A I all R,0 a A 1.1 .t OS , z II t6 at- 0 ch i+ M 0 11 11 , III n\ a�i" a. >4 1+ a 0 11 ii naCL%0iq i 11 N a+wy m4" $- DC Ca it Ir04 2: UII 11N >.x0 X at G q CG ill = it A 0 +r6* OC +E 11 U11 F: xx A II 14 R .O x II N 9 —Y • N g_ Z If M N It N ►� ro lA N Y H Q B If N N 0 Nn iii u g N i � E-+ r' N ! N 0 N N fn > 1.4 n ti o 0 Hit a Q p �, If ac z E N N a � ¢ Iz ►°� w ►a 6 Ill It z w '" it If U w In U d mc MULTI- FAHILY PROPERTY MAINTENAVE PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REGULATIONS Background: Current regulations for residential property mainte'�ance do not differentiate between single family and multi - family units. However, the type of maintenance problems that can develop are often very differenz`. UnItie a single family home e;here one person is typic0 ly responsible for the property, mLl,t - family projects may involve many individuals with various degrees of responsibility. This situation often makes it difficult. to apply current property maintenance regulations on a consistent basis. I To remedy this situation and improve the City's ability to control conditions at multi - family projects, gaff will propos4,modifications to existing City regulations and enforcement procedures. Changing our approach to multi - family unit property maintenance is an important step towarti maintaining the City's position to be at the forefront of neighborhood improvemert and conservation efforts. Analysis: In many ways,, the r„anageir- -nt of multi- family projects is similar to large commercial developments. The existence of common and public access areas and the demands of many different tenants requires a plan for on -going maintenance, and personnel, to accomplish the task. This similarity is most clear at the time of initial planning and de%!elopment when comparing aesthetic considerations and site amenitiies. The application of the City's high development standards and the requirements of specific quality site design is the hallmark of Planning Commission and staff review. Unfortunately, multi- family projects: -seem to suffer more noticeable detL.ioration than their commercial counterparts. In. considering this problem, it is staff's conclusion that property owners and managers ac multi- family projects are not adequately exposed to the initial development criteria. Thctr on -going management and maintenance activities are often cond;r; d independent of the original site development plans. The result is deterioFa`fnn_nf the quality appearance of the project as it was originally conceived Strategy: To remedy this situation and improve the maintenance of multi - family units, on -going maintenance programs m, 't be brought in line with the initial development criteria. Municipal Code requirements should be developed specifically for multi- family projects. Property maintenance regulations should address common problems and development standards and p roo,1de realistic remedies for violctions. Regulations S�-Icific to land use already exist for commercial projects and are less likely•tc be misinterpreted or misapplied. Schedule: If the planning Commission concurs with this approach, staff would begin the process by reviewing existing regulations and researching available options. Additional information must be obtained from other jurisdictions, specifically regarding properly iaintenance regulation through residential unit review programs. Once the infcirmation has been compiled anti analysis completed, proposed ordinance amendments car be developed. Staff anticipates that this matter could be broua.)z back to the Planning Commission at the Forst meeting in Maya