Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-39 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 08-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY AMENDMENT DRC2006-00447, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM VILLAGE COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.79 ACRES OF LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND SAN CARMELA COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF -APN: 1089-581-01. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates, on behalf of Baseline Victoria Park Partners LLC, filed an application DRC2006-00447, requesting a change to the Victoria Community Plan land use designation, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of August 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 27, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property within the City; and b. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment; and C. The proposed change in the Victoria Community Plan land use designation of the subject site will be consistent with the land use concept and density provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The proposed land use changes will more effectively implement the goals and objectives of the Victoria Community Plan that sought to fulfill the need for housing in a variety of residential types including condominiums. The requested land use change and associated tract map to develop market rate condominiums on the site will result in a more efficient use of the subject site that is generally compatible with the existing residential development in the immediate area. The land use designation change from commercial to residential will also result in fewer potential land use conflicts between a larger commercial center and adjacent residential uses. Finally, the density level of the proposed Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units/acre) land use designation will provide a natural transition between the Medium-High density (14-24 dwelling units/acre) level of the condominium project to the north and the Low-Medium density level of the single-family development to the east and west of the site. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-39 DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES. August 27, 2008 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and b. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and C. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public-Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-39 DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES. August 27, 2008 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00447 by adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance, as shown in the attached Exhibit A. Planning Department 1) Approval of this amendment to the Victoria Community Plan is contingent on the approval of the General Plan Amendment to change the Neighborhood Commercial designation to Medium Residential Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-39 DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES. August 27, 2008 Page 4 ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-39 DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES. August 27, 2008 Page 5 heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-39 DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES. August 27, 2008 Page 6 vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by R.T. Quinn & Associates, (May 14, 2008) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-39 DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES. August 27, 2008 Page 7 shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO]) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director and Building Official for review and approval, building plans that demonstrate compliance with the noise attenuation recommendations of the acoustical engineer as contained in the Noise Impact Analysis prepared by LSA Associates (August 2006), and on file with the Planning Department. Any alternative methods proposed for mitigating noise impacts on the project shall be prepared by the acoustical engineer and presented to the City for review and approval by the Planning and Building Departments. 2) Construction or grading on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m., including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-39 DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES. August 27, 2008 Page 8 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 5) Haul truck deliveries on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: O Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: Ames R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of August 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART,WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00447, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE PLAN FROM VILLAGE COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR 4.79 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND SAN CARMELA COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1089-581-01. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph and Associates filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. DRC2006-00447, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On August 27th, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2006-00447 and issued Resolution No. 08-", recommending the City Council approve the above listed application. 3. On , 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on , including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 4.79 acres of vacant land that slopes from north to south. Said property is currently designated as Village Commercial; and b. The project site is currently zoned Village Commercial and is within the Victoria Community Plan (VCP). The properties surrounding the site are also in the VCP and specifically identified as single-family residential development to the east and west in the Low-Medium Density Residential District; condominiums to the north in the Medium-High Residential District; and a small commercial retail center to the immediate south/southeast in the Village Commercial District. Further south across Base Line Road is the Filippi Winery in the High Density Residential District; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08-XX VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOICATES (date) Page 2 d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and f. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and g. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and h. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Victoria Community Plan Amendment is hereby amended to change the Development District Map in words and figures as shown in the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08-XX VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00447 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOICATES (date) Page 3 d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance, The City Council of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, clauses, phrases or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Ll r d3SOf SAN CARMELA � I» I ° ter ,lN3NIM Iddl"Ild N' n I I J p l'. { }I. {Ciiif t � • 2 - b ti 's $x ''r._'tea c r.�.i..i�`,�"C �,�� .�{, r - _ 1 I A C F S2 L 4. r y y i fi r u I x ;z�. iu RESERVE 6 / 1 K:= t d LIkR 1 k W 1 7�a J s . VICTORIA'PAIRK � \ / PROPOSED FWY HIGHLAND VCI/ 1 LCL , L 1 L VC Ii' ! M f� LM LM .; I LM LM LM ILM pppp IL g LM II LM LM I LM iQ wiz CF h M LM LM .�a • ? M it LM i' M L 17 LM UJI TaR I rH `'' MI BASELINE M I � c RR M p mst 4 1 LM $� LJRR i MH �.. 1 Ll I avR'R'yR• MH m. ....� t // t -�•MILLER e RR 6 � - uRR r< 1 RR ; COMMUNITY PLAN RRtl i^.AC�V ;�•j i Victoria I(i RR ➢ A Planned Community in Rancho Cucamonga RR LAND USE LEGEND ` FOOTHILL RESIDENTIAL •! Vii" L Low 2-4 DU/A 1 RR I > LM Low-medium 4-8 DU/A M Medium 804 DU/A RR f rr-N% MH Medium-High 1424 DU/A .I"i..•% H High 24-30 DU/A COMMERCIAL CF Community Facility RC Regional Center i RR Regional Related Office/Commercial VC Village Commercial REVISED DATE 08/01 /01 39 NOTE:Hatched area represents privately held land not in the planned community. e MM —� M" 1� MM Q - ': LM (I`1 WAIELINE Flow RR I 'I H M M \ t INA M 1 � RR j �W —'i LM RR RR MMR ANY&INICVN: i PILAR AR AR8p RR RR MM . s 11MIL},,E,9`! K AVENUE II�1 IjIIRRRR il�lllb:� ",,' RR V / r• 'II i VICTORIA LAKES .1 � E RR _—,� LAND USE LEGEND RESIDENTIAL Q LOW 74 DU/A `J RR LM LOWJAEDIUM Ad DU/A V II'Q FIR _ fI O MEDIUM Q.IA DU/A �IIa Itll MN MEDIUM-/ION 147ADU/A COMMERCIAL • 4 � I 0 RR / I ®vEGwNAL CErnEv / ®REGIONAL GELATED OEiKE/COMWIERCIAL Til I I 1 NOTE MATCHED ATEA REPRESENTS PRIVATELY NEL LAND NOT IN THE PLANNED COMMI'NIIY j -RRL� eVC Village Commercial COMMUNITY PLAN Victoria A Planned Community in Rancho Cucamonga Amo., 79 REVISED DATE