Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2009/01/06 - Agenda Packet
ACTION AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY JANUARY 6, 2009 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Lou Munoz Pam Stewart Corky Nicholson Alternates: Richard Fletcher Frances Howdyshell Ray Wimberly CONSENT CALENDAR NO ITEMS SUBMITTED PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m. (Michael) SIGN PERMIT DRC2008-00806 — AKC SERVICES on behalf of TNT Electric Sign - A request to install three "XPress Lube" signs at an existing auto service facility in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 10075 Arrow Route - APN: 0209-041-52. 7:20 p.m. (Adam/Cam) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00829 - WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 73 single-family lots on 26.53 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, east of the Southern California Edison Corridor — APN: 0225-071-47. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Michael Smith January 6, 2009 SIGN PERMIT DRC2008-00806 — AKC SERVICES on behalf of TNT Electric Sign - A request to install three "XPress Lube" signs at an existing auto service facility in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 10075 Arrow Route - APN: 0209-041-52. Background: The 1.87-acre project site is located at 10075 Arrow Route, on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Hermosa Avenue, and consists of three buildings: 1) a 4,162 square foot service station; 2) a 1,840 square foot auto lube facility and 3) a 1,400 square foot self serve drive-thru car wash. This project site was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on April 22, 1998, (Conditional Use Permit 97-41). Although all three buildings and the parcel are under one ownership, each business is operated by three different owners. Design Parameters: The Sign Permit for an oil change facility has been submitted by AKC Services on behalf of TNT Electric Sign. The proposed sign permit consists of three signs: 1. The first sign, identified as A-1 (Exhibit A), is proposed to be located on a pre-existing rock feature that covers the entire northeast side of the lube building. The sign will be constructed of internally illuminated channel letters. The area of this sign will be about 40 square feet (Exhibit B). This sign will replace one that is currently installed at the same location that reads "EXPRESS LUBE." The new replacement sign will read "XPress Lube" and include a "T" logo box (representing Texaco). Note that the sign area on the plans and the sign area calculated by staff differ because the applicant did not include the area between the "T" logo box and the remainder of the text. The applicant proposes to install the new sign on an exposed raceway similar to that of the current sign. Exposed raceways are inconsistent with the policies and goals of the Design Review Committee and are generally discouraged, except in unusual circumstances where the materials used or architecture do not allow any other alternative. Staff believes that the raceways could and should be located inside the building. Based on a site inspection, these unusual circumstances are not present. The applicant could install the raceway inside of the building and drill additional holes in the building wall as needed for each letter — a reason for doing otherwise is not apparent. The building wall is constructed of concrete masonry units and the rock feature is made of concrete (or similar material). Furthermore, the rock feature is thinner and flatter like a regular wall, i.e. it does not have a rounded, rock-like cross-section with significant curvilinear recesses projections that would preclude the sign from being flush-mounted on the wall (Exhibit E). Therefore, drilling through it should not be difficult. Staff recommends the applicant re-design the sign to include the raceway inside of the building and drill additional holes in the building wall as needed for each letter. 2. The second sign, identified as A-2 (Exhibit A), will be placed on the northwest elevation, above the garage opening of the lube building. This sign will be internally illuminated with channel letters flush-mounted to the building face. The area of this sign will be about 40 square feet (Exhibit C). This new sign will read "XPress Lube" and include a "T" logo box (representing Texaco). Note that the sign area on the plans and the sign area calculated by staff differ because the applicant did not include the area between the "T" logo box and the remainder of the text. This sign is proposed to be installed at a location where there is currently a set of decorative tile-like projections arranged in a 3-foot by 3-foot pattern (compare Exhibits C and F). As this feature is present at various locations throughout the site, staff believes that removing them to accommodate the sign would be inconsistent with the original design as approved by the Planning Commission. Staff recommends that the applicant pursue an alternative location or reduce the size of the sign. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00806—AKC SERVICES January 6, 2009 Page 2 3. The third sign, identified as B (Exhibit A), will be a non-illuminated, flush-mounted foam sign located on the northeast elevation of a separate garage (that is part of the business), facing the back wall of the carwash building. The area of this sign will be about 45 square feet (Exhibit D). This new sign will read "XPress Lube" only. As with Sign A-2, this sign is proposed to be installed at a location where there is currently a set of decorative tile-like projections arranged in a 3-foot by 2-foot pattern (compare Exhibits D and G). Staff recommends that the applicant pursue an alternative location. All signs are less than 150 square feet in area and have an area less than 10 percent of the face of each building to which they are attached, as required by the City's Sign Ordinance. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. All raceways shall be mounted in the interior of the building consistent with the Design Review Committee's policies and goals. 2. The decorative tile-like projections shall be protected in-place. The applicant shall reduce the size of the signs to accommodate the tile-like architectural element or find another location for the signs. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the submittal and resubmit it for review and action. If the Committee agrees with staff's above-noted solutions, staff can verify the changes once they are made and it will not be necessary for the application to be reviewed again by the Committee. ATTACHMENTS Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Mike Smith Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson The Committee directed the applicant to revise the design for Sign A-1 on the rock feature at the northeast side of the lube building so that the raceway is hidden and not exposed. As exposed raceways are inconsistent with the City's current design standards and goals, the Committee would not accept that solution even though the existing sign has exposed raceways. Also, because of the pending code enforcement action regarding signs with exposed raceways installed on the site by unrelated parties, the Committee stated that the City has to apply this requirement consistently. Mr. Nicholson suggested using 'pin' mounts and said these were in use at Victoria Gardens. The applicant believed this was possible to do and stated he would work on this solution immediately. The Committee indicated that the applicant can work with staff to resolve this problem. Once staff determines it is acceptable, then no further action by the Committee is necessary, and staff can approve the revised sign. The Committee agreed to allow the applicant to remove the Aecorative tiles on the northwest elevation of the lube building and the northeast elevation of the separate garage for the installation of Signs A-2 and B, respectively. The business owner discussed his business and its dependence on signs (especially as he just opened). To address this, staff stated to the applicant that he can proceed to apply for the installation of Signs A-2 and B immediately and, if necessary, a temporary sign in the interim between now and the resolution of the issues with Sign A-1. I } ∎ la d ]nN3 VS OWE■H \( m : \ dla\§ 116.1 _2. / \ �V di at • : .`© ` - } \.� ' - § j - \ In 4. & ° } \ } • - + 1 - ) \ • u- / ! : �� # : • \ . / [ '` j� : \ � [ r« ƒ - { 0 - I _ . - - " • ) : \ : { 2 k H §� . . /� � ° / < . ■ - . ! ! 2 i ( 22 _ § : : \ \ � _ � \ z j ; , .• m ■ • .,,i, . d � 1 ®e■! § ` % + - \» \ e ): \ § ® § \ ƒ \\ \ [ " - - I ( o- / { § \j ) 2« ( ) §k§ i i -k§ b■ E 2- -§ §< § E§ [ ! \ ® w; r 9 • 9 . A • • • r k n 54 tf a m n 2 l^ i „ n d lE J p at :l N j O C Ell a 3 kn. V W N AI �.n } . 5 s cc wb - ! p ���p p Y N O JIl � p 44. J ' b•S K S G 2 ZN M J Fp A i V a '', 4p p 1 :owlet" ( } N b 1 I :- " klaiH i 1 2 =.4 44 m a Pt. piniwu.I _ l a ci l a tag, J. L al I E [ r 3 1. J lb, ,; i .z/t s-a �, blJr�� �y�y I s I, hz-cI, , • il�� I ¢ - !.. Q LL S N IiI • z . Q IS f tc i ' W I 00 p C _ W s z o 2 u c a e _ a ® _ 9 m e` 1 P . ¢ e C O 0 �� 5a a 1SA 2 t z re: F gG a O A O 000 0000 U m L a w i _ ' Y l r 2- p1 0 ' � 8 R= _m = b t r - 1 a E e 3 E# - _, . a TA 0 tir to' J r ` 3 H _ SP 211 I• 43e'f)a�,w- ,74'`^. ''EL,11 -*V'Sn .N¢ :ie T ....+ t .k e•f2,'Yaaar'S.r.,y ,k%:,ie < .a",,.-ee..'.e. ,. _. a. r ewe, - _ a. x . = 'gyp N • W.! W 2 1141111 ti . E a t' y �. 4 v m N f. u .�1 -_. i ^ C 3 � � F = V Or O y 6 N _ 3 .0 ". CL 0 • • 0 m N t It us E 04 il to Q e fh ce r n a e 7 W i '1'�' —h s V y i KK� nZ/l S .Z —� t `v�y c. • u. ;V-2 c' J iv 14 1, 6 I! T`SI ', 4,1 m l 'y , 6 L �ll -.C, N W !!! 1' 2 = e l N _. _ __y_ w S n S =, -r c n9'.b a - .. d9 M W R - m Q 3 '+• Q te k;f [' --- 8 ; ;• f i3 - g ip - = g 0 0000 0 0000000 0 000000 0 = * = _ I a '—rte o 110 z `° e- v S OGCOCOO DO O © hill , !L' at �' ,"�. � r , � -' , Ui'f K, i�r.'.. _�,^I:s wLit?' .�,�£� - t ti . ra.. a .,i..., .. ,2 r:._"f kit .. .h``l+A .. .` .. i..�. _ ■ r �^, '-% o it _e W 1 Q J O @III` II I-I E.ma r}_ d iii{} tl ,. S. iLLis ASS :' y I. 6 A - f S m Jy1Y �nry fl A ' 1 ( 11 'd4 O m u: " { 91l ��ln"ii.Nl Ip➢ { i O W v s �! r m 111•0:1 CO ail y 6 con' N N m I1� Tf KY�- ! :LJã Q • IttI.pp II ti i a a Ma kililled kfL4*4 0--Cr'wjei..q.ii I ili 5' , g 1 -f r W 0..L- 4 rvS $,,,.lyi: F 1 w Y ffJ� P' j r. a ..tee` N° i R"r 5 = — ,2--.E £ > 4 s a r z f.k,,' 3. ,t 44t- = 4, LL 3 ▪ F 2 N m sr Y W D W N m C i 2 O H? - z vi 414' +x I o 7 a tea, y 1., °'6: F W 3 Mt • G W 2 CO S e e I {.Y.'. .7.'J .z-ter-£. '� cc i z e e ytlf h W be H r _, m ye¢ U W Z r- It .-.- 0 m ` � 4 cc J:.% H C =r 6 w l. - S. . .n� t H i t '4y � N U an Le.. I .-.1 •gC7 ..-‘,C1. ' x:.44 '.II t. . 4_f.7,-,..-.4.',..,f-;c-.. -,213.,.) ..-Z ..I.- n } 4∎irtZ e.{ Z a +' 'itZ ♦ - }`� 1 r 3 .k _. ..�. 6 .�. fig u✓' "s� r Lr ✓ �: A4_.i 5'3'.- :-r.+' ' . y: f r I .t f , , ' " 1�- " y _ y�..c��^:4 rds. . 9 1.S x 'A.:)....z.----- yr ,• .. _.,1✓, :C3. rr-i.'77.1-4'.727,2'it. . , pp ' f . f S4 G 1 l ; . • , 1 c.J -� p?.:_ 4 w7 .x+ .' J...-1 3 4y ,: $911.4 '.1/g « _ . ';,nf ' � - '•�' � � ' r - t a . , x ' r4 y} . y i r . ty . Y` �' fr,tik Y.f f 1 tr. K• �,} .'yrye pry' ,, ,< { rte `To .:+_t'`' t;li:tt rif !' to f Yr 9 J ,.'' t �'S YV1 w fi.t_ �f : I f rr ,+ i r+ 1, - { � „ I , dal. o '"s. !4 'r Iyy} - 1 •"'..r"-r- 1 ' 1.L+i, / _. r.. -4: rSe r9.�y 17 Ii C y� y k `$.fA � ;di• • I rf 1 �r 1 .' b r r.2 r yy ` f 3L4-.. :: t yri,u! . p _' r 9r 'C S'nu;tC:41!"..44'71:44' Fein t y f njt•,/r.. `. ..fn! �.17,-,...t"'*34f 1�N6 1r„y �: ..,1 .F ,' -.0 - - - :-.'L-e 3«” r,Ityygr ! ypgl : t :+ i I^r. -,- J • r itr 1 lrr 111x' , L 9 �` Y 1.41.7.�41.1:r.v .� , ;(, ,S 5 � t `r'y] 1 syh �•w�: ' - �` ^{• i.1 l -. r{ r � f �{- • t EXHIBIT E r . .. � T : SNy ' It:"?n IR'.- 1',.q , + i .3 k ' 4 ' %'w,�pc•,L i J i I Jam`• • • t( (• _ v 7 y (` ..; a'� _- "fir r y q r. k xrr ',67: �'.t Yom, fi y }i '( 'S ,)d, a.. ` t } sF n° c } { • n c�x'� ` -� ew : ! 1{d — .f 4y E ',.c A1� h 'ici '1,vii.:i....p�cct" .p z � ¢ r d 4 .• t rii rid - e S � ( " tl,.ra 3 -4 � t j i '.' S#�g+, , r44 M j,f . a R F k,J •ill r " r i ..rg 5}'.,-i: i f ilii .. .-.. i f . . ...... 4 4, , ,..y., .). , .. „.._,.11,._:_:---..:::-- _.,- . . •. „ . _ .__ .,..., ,,, _. ., .,. 4t.‘ . it . ---_ - _,_ ,. tip i .; --.14-..- ,--..,?.. i --.::,,,,•_;.."_:-."'1,-:._,,..,-1.,- .: illt h it,,1,:::'ilkOP/A 1 ip, - - _ -i. ip, _J st } 3-} c I i f 3 '-:''-':-:-':: l'11':'''' el' 6 411,,„, „. :,,.., . ..,„ , A , . . '''.----; ., ___r-7==-'4-.--6Z----2 - Sp r. r 4,-,.'"..4;;..i.'-... '"�N l' FJe :1 t A f' `$` { � . • �c_ 1I, ywrwpMrk _ _ • t'' f. A. ri 's< y .. uu-,.. ,l.,lll t i _ ' i�t(!tt ((I ' 11 11,il 1 f. L .., I " INV i-r-' 1 ((ji 4 yl':1-1,'-';{t0l _ A b Pr �'' Att 1 ., ` ft ,,_ •ll ` r a� 1��1,1 .s' ,, ,, a c.e r. ' rH .r . - it .k\o„,,,..-1.± '0. - ` �t �Y Sk'"� fit' Yft4+1 I, Y t jdq�a'5 ;. q frx -L: to 3%, tI F • 1S Ca 177..t. ,;'� 4 ,;V.'-'.',.. .G. Fl gst' I' r C tt f5t � u stz if � f i k ,l c - gyp,•.. is - 1114:-;,.4..,,44p .rte ^Lf -i. y ' k �, F�l. I el` 'il . f d! 5• y y y = �. L W+ { .. it i - 1 ;.• t„ran,> ^.S .:,std. rim liki, b .• �yl _ 4 �- h .4 e. EXHIBIT ._, ■,....,.., ., ,, . v.- .--_---:-.-- 0,4 =.—,_..•,- - . =-..--i--_ • • • . , -- ,.tk _•,:':=--!-- '-- , ' .--'''',- ''' ;:''' ••;'. : ! . --.' 1.1i1,*I 1-'. ' . ..'- ' i •-• •:`...' i Sot- sr, ii, ' •'.‘:7' : - . If 1 -- 12- I illi # •-;1,'; . Ar • , / = . , •.: . = :,,, ,,,;--... =. ,, r -- .,..,i , .. , .'• - g....„,,, -._, -4, ‘ . , . .. ! r‘...1,..., ,,.,.. . ;II ., , 4• . ''',. .','''' •, , ' " 1- ,, 11 1 44 V --.-.,il.--•_:. , ••--,,,,,,,,. :1 Ii I : i I ,.4,,... . _ z =9.','-7: *- ".-- ':` . . -•,,,,-,m 1 z y ,. - I Q '1.1''',,•' ' •':,:.- '. '.11.‘ =0. .1. - Ii 1,-- ik-. e= 4,,,' • ', • • - - -:,-,_. _ , .• ,-7_.--- --, , ' 7•F',, ' 'Ck, '''• ' 1 .: , 1 :1', *:.;•.,,,,-. -_ -'. - -. ,, : :4,-A . -,,v,,, 1----, ---;7-i-,--4,...ft —'"' ...,_.,. 40f:f2-.:r...;„ .:-. -,;.; '..s.‘,:,:t,• e.., 0 .., ,, ,- ,,-. .. ,_ ,.._.2,----_ II f 1„ -"- .,0- , ,....,-__..,...._.. .5- - ...,7.,.,r;i...1...z.: . ..i. .A ..,-4-g.ti4.--.,.,;,,,-...:.....; ..., ' - •' , . .„..„,. • 't-.4••:_=.-i.:=4-::::.• • , it, .... _._.. ...7 , ....,..._, . . ,..,- ,,... .if...,r,--.,i,-:-,;‘,71---.;.'•-i-- ' • . ,'..'''' . ____________ ,,,i,•7 1,.': "L."-:`....•'-' - , „. .:, . ....,, ,.. 4°1 .1...'-2.:;- ----..:.•,,, .._..-. . ..,.. . ' ..,,,..7,...„, ',A.-....'...._..-:,..,...,,''.„:;; ,. ...,.. ..„ . ... -..,-,.... ,,,•.;., .. , T .., •, ..,. .1. . . .„. • .-7.4-4_,44.„5.-,,. *4-1- -., ■ • f . . ' . I '..'4."-- • . , 4.. -.: -7- ._ .'. ,. 1 - -.- ..• ": A ''' . : 1...J--W: • 1.-li. . . - . . . , . :... --.17-,-.1 ,:. ._ . :-..,..,=... -lit" tk ' 1... '.. 1i't I$'f A. • = ' . t.,,f.. ..„.w,: .; t !.. 1. .,_,... , ,..... t..., 1,t '•-I-.:- ;75_ lk, ..„„, .'-'!;,-!:-.4171. - . - . '':-.'1;-7-;:;'''', zr.' - 1 1 \\\\\‘ ,- ••., • ''..•....e...•.. . . .,. ‘i ..._ ... . , -.. ,-1...--...i.,,,..... .z..-.'--.--:. ..- Hi.- . '' ' .----."i,- ..''''-;:,=.-,..,,,----:,'"'''''•-•'''':'.'.i t.„,'-'.,=.-. .... : , ,. .. -.::: :4 .,-,;;.:::•.'ori---k, .-:-: :- . . . ,. • .. ... . . .....'..' --A! .' !-..... i•.:,...--,•A: -'. EXHIBIT G . ) #FFyy n 34Y47:17 _ �- - r. • y 'std' i - -__1171-----______:_ii:7--717.,_-:-------'—___,----17---„: t. 7_.-:.es:,_-_____1_ �' s_ k sS Zl ? ac a. tE 7. s t r • .'rte•=''_ .:(:-.4,:=, 6: - -tks,,,, Yy i - ,n•' z art 3 K 4 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Adam Collier January 6, 2009 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00829 -WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL CALIFORNIA -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 73 single-family lots on 26.53 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, east of the Southern California Edison Corridor — - APN: 0225-071-47. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. Background: Warmington Residential California is requesting approval for the development of 73 single-family lots previously entitled by K. Hovnanian Homes under Development Review DRC2005-00885. Because of the downturn in the housing market, K. Hovnanian Homes has discontinued construction on their remaining lots and have since been acquired by Warmington Residential California. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, heavy timber, and specific architectural styles. A Development Agreement was approved in 2001, which allowed for the Low Residential development standards for all lots within the tract. The property was rough graded in June of 2004 and infrastructure was installed. The master developer has installed the main access of the gated community, as well as the slope landscaping and decorative perimeter walls. These walls will be consistent throughout the entire master-planned community. The site is bordered by vacant land to the north and east; by Day Creek Boulevard to the south; and a portion of Tract 16227, being built by Meritage Homes, to the west. Design Parameters: The project site is located within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood which has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP. The ENSP requires that a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Bungalow, Ranch, Monterey, or San Juan. Up to one-third of the units may use these styles: Country, Victorian, or Santa Barbara Revival. The proposed homes are consistent with the required architectural styles and include downsized floor plans and larger yard areas to meet the demand of the current housing market. The new plans are a combination of one- and two-story homes and range in size from 2,661 square feet to 3,183 square feet of livable area. A total of 15 (20.6 percent) of the proposed homes will be a "mock single-story" that has a roof pitch and front elevation that appears substantially as a single-story home. The two-story plans have been designed with three floors plans and four architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles include Santa Barbara Revival, Country, Ranch, Monterey, San Juan, and Santa Barbara. The Ranch incorporates full-wrap heavy timber rafter tails, board and batten at gable ends, and ledgestone veneer. The San Juan proposes corbel accents, adobe veneer, and full- wrap heavy timber rafter tails. The Monterey features decorative shutters and corbels, full-wrap heavy timber rafter tails, and potshelves. The San Juan features tile vent details, decorative tile around entryway, brick pavers, and decorative shutters. The Country incorporates wood trim around the entry porch with knee braces, decorative shutters, and recessed windows. The Santa Barbara elevation includes decorative clay vents, iron potshelves, and decorative shutters. DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18710 AND DRC2008-00306 — LEWIS OPERATING CORP. January 6, 2009 Page 2 Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff. Based on discussions with each department, there are no major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff. Based on discussion with each department, there are no secondary issues. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 2. Driveways shall be scored in a horizontal or diagonal pattern for additional entryway detail. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval the project subject to the above revisions. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Adam Collier Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Thomas Tupman, applicant, presented a Development Design Review for the construction of 73 single-family homes in Rancho Etiwanda Estates. The proposal included four (4) floor plans and a total of five (5) elevations. The proposal included a detailed site plan and landscape plans for the subject lots. The Committee members approved the project subject to minor revisions to the color palette for the Plan 2 and 3 Ranch elevations. The Committee felt that the pop-outs on the rear elevation should be painted to match the adjacent facade, rather than a contrasting color. The Committee members directed staff to verify that the revisions will be made prior to the Planning Commission hearing. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS JANUARY 6, 2009 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, &Si . ritit Corkran W. Nicholson Assistant Planning Director