The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2011/05/25 - Agenda Packet J • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ifs PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 25, 2011 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER Roll Call Chairman Munoz_ Vice Chairman Howdyshell _ Fletcher_ Wimberly_ • Oaxaca _ IH. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 27, 2011 Regular Meeting Minutes IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2010-00188M - MCALAN'S PUB AND GRILL - A request to modify CUP DRC2010-00188 to increase the hours of operation of the Restaurant/Bar use to add two additional hours during Sunday through Wednesday and one additional hour on Thursday and with no change to entertainment hours. Located at 6321 Haven Avenue-APN: 201-272-06. • 1 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • L MAY 25, 2011 RANCIIO CUCA.MONGA Related File: Entertainment Permit DRC2010-00189. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT -A proposal to subdivide four (4) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APNs: 0225-191-03, -04, - 13, -15, and -20. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. C. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the south perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a • combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway(SR-210); APNs: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. V. PUBLIC COMMENTS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. • 2 of 4 w J • e- PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA S MAY 25, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMMONGA I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 19, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. L / ® If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. • INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. • 3 of 4 ��... PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • L . MAY 25 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,164 for maps and$2,273 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http:l/www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us • • 4 of 4 r Vicinity Map . • Planning Commission Meeting May 25 , 2011 i A --- �_ BandC ina i c c .0C1 rj m W E c r E( d , € > i 1 ca.ca. r CZ y m m. kco • EMI lan IN ' . -- 19th st c 1 Base Line ' $P!ase Line nri lisiriMI v`, Church • Church oothill ii ■ - . Foothill a Arrow an f0 a i Arrow >� E ( m� 8th > _._. _ W r._..Lill f� 6th` m --16th N r € d i > _ 4th i' ¢ x ?_— _ n-1 r _.—.i 4th El • * Meeting Location: City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 • DATE: May 25, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Larry Henderson AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: NON CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2010- 00188M — MC ALAN'S PUB AND GRILL - A request•to modify CUP DRC2010-00188 to increase the hours of operation of the Restaurant/Bar use to add two additional hours during Sunday thru Wednesday and one additional hour on Thursday and with no change to entertainment hours. Located at 6321 Haven Avenue. APN: 201-272-06 Related File: DRC2010-00189 (Entertainment Permit) RECOMMENDATION: Because of technical and operational concerns that need to be addressed by the applicant, staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the hearing for Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00188M to the regular meeting of June 22, 2011. Respectfully suC(b/�mitth„p)edd,, • Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:LJH/Is • Item A STAFF REPORT `` � PLANNING DEPARTMENT '• Date: May 25, 2011 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A proposal to subdivide four (4) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot • subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences (Part) and Vacant (Part, Tract 17651); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Access road for San Bernardino Flood Control District and Foothill Freeway (SR-210) East - Vacant; Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single-Family Residences (part) and Vacant (Part); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - 'Very Low Residential South - n/a East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project area consists of multiple parcels with a combined area of about • 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 2,500 feet (east to west) by about 940 feet (north to south) (Exhibit B). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The Items B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page.2 • eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is vacant property that was recently subdivided into 56 lots and is currently being graded for pending construction of homes (Related file: Tract 17651). To the west are additional single-family residences and a single vacant parcel. To the south is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this road is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east are vacant parcels. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (Exhibit C). The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development (Exhibit D). Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required. The depth of each lot will be at least 200 feet, and the width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension. All lots will be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow • conventional house plotting. Included in the proposal are several streets, including one that will link East Avenue and adjacent future residential development at Tract 17651 to the north and the vacant parcel to the east. As the subject property is located within the Equestrian Overlay, each lot will have a dedicated corral area of 24 feet by 24 feet for horse-keeping, and equestrian trails will be provided along the rear of each lot per Section 5.25.500 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Along the north perimeter of the project site, a 20-foot wide Community Trail will be constructed per Figure 5-18 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. From East Avenue to a point approximately 1,200 feet to the east, at the north side of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70, and 71, the alignment of the trail will be located entirely within the proposed subdivision. From that point to the northeast corner of the subject site, the alignment of the trail shifts northward, and only 8 feet of the required 20 feet width of the trail, at the north side of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35, and 46, will be within the proposed subdivision. The other 12 feet will be on the neighboring property to the north (Tract 17651). B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Etiwanda High School at 9161 Base Line Road on October 16, 2009 (Exhibit J). Several individuals from the surrounding community attended. None of them had any specific objections to the project. Most of the comments were related to off-site improvements as a result of the project including street widening, installation of utilities (natural gas and sewer), undergrounding of existing power lines, removal of trees, and construction of new walls (including the noise attenuation wall). The applicant answered these questions to the satisfaction of those present. Some of their questions could not be answered because the subject of the inquiry, such as obtaining a connection to a natural gas line, could only be addressed by the applicable utility. There were • concerns about impacts related to construction activity including fugitive dust and noise. Staff stated to the attendees that the applicant's proposal does not include house product, therefore, B & C- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 • Page 3 grading would be limited to rough grading, and there would not be any construction activity associated with this application. Nevertheless, there are mitigation measures that must be followed by developers to control dust and noise. Measures to control dust will include the use of a water truck to stabilize soil and prevent it from becoming airborne, ceasing construction during strong winds, and a variety of barriers to prevent water runoff. The principal means to control noise will be to limit the hours of construction. Staff also noted to the attendees that in the event such measures were not being followed, they could contact the City (or other agencies like the Air Quality Management District) to investigate the problem and, if there is a violation, require the applicant to correct the violation. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) and Technical Review Committee reviewed the application on December 15, 2009. The • Committees accepted the proposal and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D. Desiqn Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Nicholson) reviewed the application on December 15, 2009 (Exhibit H). The Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted after concluding that the design/layout of the tract is standard for the zoning district and area of the project site. The height of the noise attenuating.walls was identified as standard for residential projects along the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). Staff indicated that the design and construction of the wall would be per Caltrans • standard. The Committee noted that the house product would be reviewed later when the developer of the site submitted the plans and that the opportunity for additional comments would occur at that time. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the application on December 9, 2009 (Exhibit I). In general, the Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted with several relatively minor revisions including enlarging the corner cut-offs at trail intersections, providing block walls along the perimeter of trails throughout the subdivision (instead of PVC fencing), and providing safety/identification signs and striping. The Committee also requested that staff research two (2) significant revisions relating to the proposed 20-foot wide Community Trail. The first was the possibility of allowing horse-keeping related vehicles access to the trail, i.e. drive on it, to facilitate the movement of such vehicles in a forward-facing direction through the trail.system. The second was the planting of the replacement • Eucalyptus windrow in order to enhance the aesthetics along the trail on the north side of the proposed north perimeter wall of the subdivision that will be located adjacent and parallel to the trail. Staff discussed the requests with the Engineering and Public Works Departments, and it was determined that neither request could be accommodated. The first request could not be granted as a) there was a potential for safety to be compromised because of motorized vehicles sharing the same path of travel as pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian traffic, b) the surface of the trail was not designed to support such traffic and would be subject to damage, and c) motorized vehicles are not permitted on the Community Trail system anywhere else in the City. The second request could not • be granted as long-term maintenance including tree pruning and watering would become the sole responsibility of the City. At a follow-up meeting with the Committee on September 8, 2010, alternate solutions were discussed. The Committee agreed to the two following solutions: 1) to address the first request, hammerhead turnarounds would be provided at the north ends of each B & C- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 4 • north to south segment of Local Trails that intersect with the Community Trail to permit vehicles to reverse direction (these will match the turnarounds near the east and west termini of the east to west trail along the south perimeter of the subdivision), and 2) to address the second request, the Eucalyptus windrow would be planted adjacent and parallel to the Local Trail and wall that will be located along the south perimeter of the subdivision. At this meeting, there was additional discussion regarding the wall along the rear of each property and its design. The applicant and the • Committee agreed that the wall would be comprised of a solid lower portion constructed of decorative blocks and an open upper portion constructed of rod iron fencing. These solutions and the Committee's other conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Variance DRC2009-00020: The applicant has submitted a Variance to allow the construction of noise attenuating walls along the south, east, and west perimeters of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height (Exhibit F). Noise attenuation walls were identified as the principal means for mitigating noise impacts generated by traffic on East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) according to the noise study prepared by Mestre Greves Associates on October 9, 2008. Per Section 17.08.060(K) of the Development Code, the maximum height of walls permitted in residential districts is 6 feet. The proposed walls will be approximately 6 to 15.5 feet above the pad elevations of the lots adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. Depending on the location, some walls will be constructed over retaining walls, i.e. a combination wall. Therefore, as seen from the outside, the height of the walls will be greater. The general area where the walls will be highest is near the southeast corner of the subdivision at Lot 16 where the wall, as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 22 feet high. • Facts For Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: 1. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Fact/s: The proposed walls are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise levels at the lots along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is necessary to mitigate the noise impacts to a level that is less than 65 dBA CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) as specified in the Development Code. If the walls were limited to 6 feet as specified in the Code, or if the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise levels would not comply with the Code nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety policies relating to noise (Goal PS-13 of the General Plan). There is no practical alternative to walls that will achieve the desired noise attenuation. 2. Finding : That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact/s: The project site is located approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway • (SR-210) at the east side of East Avenue. As a result, it is exposed to noise generated by traffic that is generally not present near other residential properties in B & C- 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Pages • the City which are screened by existing development and/or sufficiently distant from these principal noise sources that noise impacts are negligible. 3. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. • Fact/s: The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise. The exterior noise levels generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and would negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the • outdoor areas of his property in the absence of these walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise attenuating materials used in the construction of the homes is augmented by the presence of the noise attenuating perimeter wall. The absence of the wall would reduce the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the occupants of the homes to elevated interior noise. 4. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact/s: The Foothill Freeway (SR-210) corridor within the City is adjacent to numerous residential properties. Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to . levels as described in the Development Code and consistent with the General Plan. The freeway corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the Very Low (VL) Residential District. Walls of this height, or similar are common along the freeway corridor for noise attenuation purposes where residential properties are adjacent to the freeway. 5. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Facts: The height of the walls as seen from East Avenue will be 6 feet and will not be adjacent to any private property. In addition to appearing to have the typical height of a perimeter wall, the wall, along with associated landscaping, will be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The height of the wall as seen from the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) will be similar to the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor within the City. This wall will be constructed per the decorative design established by Caltrans. The properties adjacent to the wall along the east perimeter of the proposed subdivision are vacant. This wall will be constructed of decorative block per the City's Design Guidelines. Upon development of the properties to the east of Lots 17 - 22, any residential structures, in compliance with the minimum rear yard setback standard, will be at least 60 feet from the wall. The lot immediately to the east of Lot 16 will likely have a matching pad elevation when it is developed to match the proposed subdivision (for grading, street alignment, and drainage purposes). Therefore, the retaining portion of the wall (approximately 7.5 feet in height) as seen from this lot would be buried, reducing the visible height of the wall. •G. Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224: The existing trees throughout the site will be removed as necessary, and a replacement Eucalyptus tree windrow will be planted with a spacing of 8 feet on B & C- 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 6 • center per Section 5.41.501 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of these trees. A set of replacement Eucalyptus windrows will be planted along the entire south perimeter and part of the east perimeter of the subdivision (Exhibit G). Originally, the windrow was to be installed along the north perimeter of the subdivision but was relocated to address the revisions requested by the Trails Advisory Committee, as noted above. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project.. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, Staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for • the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 and • Variance DRC2009-00020 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts.?7ub /Jamyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Conceptual Master Plan/Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Exhibit E - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit F - Preliminary Wall and Fence Plan Exhibit G - Preliminary Tree Removal and Windrow Replacement Plan Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Comments (December 15, 2009) Exhibit I - Trails Advisory Committee Action Comments (December 9, 2009 and December 8, 2010) Exhibit J - Neighborhood Meeting Summary (prepared by the Applicant] Exhibit K - Initial Study Parts I and II • Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2009-00020 B & C- 6 I i 6:9e `• F d 1 •6 w Mwnr, I„e,i cS m1"x<s x s I g� r' ' & A € T S iV$I�/. I' � , F� �- PROJECT SITE ; • BL v id ,,I; r. o, s 8 w.-- AIL E' 'a Is r j + LI uson �I"� tI III a+ ri I LIppppllll N.WE t14YIF6Vx Ian -.. 9'S T pRpFILA �l y ^ IT II ILAC — � �� M to eP�. tlI1 I ¢ _ -- i Pttx Angr _ R mrt1F .4•.. 1 ETA"! NOACREEK PARK '�• 3 LOS OSOS iKKmt G 1 y4 RE I OAY GOGO I N I _— I SUM *. /•.-� • n � U1 guxP€ I ] A I - S SUM I igvrIR[v OrPe[ € Ayy�IX I MGPRA I aI „A Le II U INTE EDIATE EANYMT 4 r P. NYFf S]_ Jl _ L � 6UNN ,ZII -*w m ".I a e, �_" II g fineNSn w 1! yJ{� e -e - % II m.simuk, NAr.e. ""12 . .eel ei 4 a II sAOn NR d I i� I� it[YILG $ £�Slu ry 4" ! �1 x„,- _ .+e.. -.w.. "'O`IIn _ Itxi E. Ali c a`J�fIL X] —>,_ 'Colt- tiA.uss_ S VI i I I p$AP SI P 6EIR�cI1MAa ]' L a° +A+lwy etMM EL a- Is .ny 6r gnu i i 4Aas _ II t b `r. 'ems ^'JIIss L i�w� T rri f I[xFOuu_ p ll W°W'"N evw r 6 ,xm Nen�I a_ 6gg a. I !I _I'• . Axmu fox RI I II ai NIGHLANU AVE \\ /�- T F y c I..�NU[ } I _ f 11�-- I ( d� F � I oc _nm orv6on =mw..� ;' �E xn AY I dI- �I isriwusTOP ' ,u I c#re is acr:0 \"x� it 1 dl Ili r J _0 fills, k;. Hers. 5 IPI lIIrt N I a r n • I , W a WTI r }r r ms* a Ns.t,& J e fr"C t w '1,11:. _zR MI _._ ..:. -n ' ry w° �fi. I -al. RANCHO NGA 'ncuFFUOC 4 --n�—w 9A m Sa -"" Z OA rlax3Lll ' -M.vlvSraRS�� A-- -.. ' ' kR°�E Nt F n n �ry??� F., "'^- w�5 '�i<+� a=IT-4_3 _ I � Q Y f ETI DA < 7x,w`"¢m1 ASV. ' ") r )1 v9 ' ( , Wwoxows Fa cwwsl p ,q IJ 3 r Mfr( v I Y zwr. L v' wlNORM< rw5 ws" L ,!,, e ild P el 1 �� 'al �.I Ilp I 1PRA F S f uA"O§✓/"}v' - _@5_`j JlII pk I m A 6- ° 5 w VICiOPIn ST - _ I.\ hU ��r ^ag l ETIWANDA PSgy IF 4 GIN4 5 n_.,,z OOFuoese !h. '6 Mf(1 t:jtt4±: %E W. .1Ir d� I@ iw r%111N r CE'- . 11 3� wiO /II I p d e A r: 7� � gI 6 9'+` ck l uyyyn"m 1� uw w d NI -exi.+.h. '� s2$ r sr yy i 0- l y 6 ',VI; i nnin4 n Ft ] G r1 3j if Y^^$`3' 'I LY GRACEGANO p J6r �[I C !451`. e4 hl v I wL u i t 6 $ g4 I A ,..c R CM.rtw 4 ,lei iwmFir m nM "�— 3: a aa s k Fine ° 2 e I -`dws■Iwo\ �^i I €�s4 Jk III a, 'I d6 stxs' 3 ml I' ^N g i ' x41 o IL@jsMgo_� -1L "' r `l I wn[6 Si x 91 1- BASE LINE BLVD ___ c vUeR. - -ra AL II _ _ kI ¢v o f , r m FsroaGA Illl oc n r L@w ri T ;' pd U urrom t WINE MUSE I1 1, c oewO[ w Mt c / �aa.n A d IC II.Il n °t % ; - 91 V. a] r uR st. FM'a P-. I 5h Osx ON IfiO [El '" wauet . 1 W ' w 4 f r idrt m`.`le �� p� 5 •" nr / 'xcr'L,--..s'34,4.. (i F°`1 �=.],1 IHFI �MINIo[ 'a laz ar 511 J .n t°^ g �I -- a 71'il )�l1 `yst,„;4{� ©,- 4,-..\OJ.ae mi ,q irya'4'_ "NE d A ,�� 't F{ %i p\SR< dC,F+ +m _APIEiwnr J $ ji1! F1H T . �I�I wb n I --- ncN I M� _ � ��"e4new i1 li "4 -- s Host r I I, gRrr sw n FOa it a$ eI G e u u[6r eP .� .awN.,V \ar N II MIIRLLRIR IA r II _—_ MILLER v El _ . LIKEN ° q VICTORIA GARDENS ' e f.EA K yh,s 1213-i"5'xUp65I I xmxNUxn I I sn wFRC1 y o+ r i� WYV51l° I II 3 " Y, �', MCA ,2JQ :% aIYex I ma..ms�' iomxw]xs[ Y L!P0 3 tMxOU {IA N r eoA'. i /:z lye - dr - 4 4 e 5 8 L F tt I_d p 11 s sN i c�,,rme ^t o -IA- pGO�ar�si. wmuG[s sr II 5 1: 5 aaevrruua 6 1 a I d A. 0----:A' iPoFO5E4 NCfOPIA NA[G JIR — e � �(O Igadnr I1'F I,.r ' 1$ HISTORIC FOOTHILL BLVD FOOTHILL OOSSmC /' AvF u EXHIBIT A ;,1 tN _ ii roomnuunxOTrGac= S) r I {° III I: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 and Variance DRC2009-00020 A6 ++ .t zS'K'+.t a, Sw r M•' rah I Ja , i, i n fai s+ F 7,^R ..„. it 'a"+ c JL �i t lv z I 91 s-, .- Y 4t , t S .+ L ,, , a 1•y¢^. (.. .>JA:cm L r4.:t: /f1 kf +X..I vct i- t.,:"• 1` y'" a a l Sr s i y l r n< i 't i. �3 1,a.� �l : �• "�I il-' 1Y.n 414 21-- .s',v� t.,,,,,'"'1%: ' l:Itilf , -(�"„s Fy 'kF�• .F 4jzi4 �--..t..`",..,;;:.: .,{� ♦♦1. ft'`ynt l tre r (r� f ).'t ?TM WY�+f K[ h >r � r f111 Y3i Y• 4 .k ft" Y hY? Hf A 41 M1 .5 1 0,g.7,;:, +,rr 't1 l t ta' -12, s• r 1 An . * $ r + , 1 'x r r r1 .. } { 5d5 .,.t n "fk Lx pj. S c r 1 is AJ; Irr 71 r1 i s 1:7 l w 1 +.. �rax 11 >ta y1 Y6^I I �Ns-,t Yil.+' ✓ i} >•t yl �?'•A7sLlari>' It r,..:1 • y � z• '' "Fri\ \7 i� '•1 i I r' � e . ..k.44 tit"rkcf i".') "' tit Y l 1 ,1 '' W -•. rg ati3 II r,i �•,r},'�P,4 •!'' f 1 r Ir !! < zl ,r+ �r1 t r al ��' ) r 3r+F qh 3 r L I� o f 1 + 1'� y'.6r it.t ��(�i �Y gLfP6 ryn. li rcl j M1 r t' I ; i�.. f ' a r �c 'n; , 1i s� i+ r1 r ... 2IS *, ).L 1 , t � r 1i 711 Lei•.. li J A.a.w 4Pfi i ar' 1*z 1 tri't,+e 1,, , d, �i '' -It ,, �R " t k .� 1{, .G 40.,,,i-J,I.l�' v f M '41 rf 4 r'4 @ 6„.� G ,Y. [ r v x ] iil >'V 1 tar 1 4iyr C 1 i I I hex z ' v.: i'f ,�'n`1d° Y.y - r .,i, r t 1;11, xa y 1 „y> ti ly, ,d 'V�+ r. ' 1 .- t Ga•-,w t p s A"'.f . 4 i 1 "k t .q .M,. - I..0 5s d E` �n ..��1 {.� ��a S „-• t s t- KI i, _i '4 r p .r If, N'.• 7B. "s?4�"T'�m" 3sr t Th. 1 o It f -+-a m A FH J +. t{ f i J: . - 'Syt r'^ 5 J Il Y 1 Jfx i '+7 j � 1 l �, 6% a ,:..,4:,...,,,, 1 -yr;y.�rr . .h.� 4; 3 1y,. to f "r d r y f (� "e'r f > L 'i Gk4�y.� 1ltc' n 'F4 . a't '�.�S�J SC >rn Y E 1 rl tyl 1 r f r. t�- 's` a tr I r 1 (r 1 G --4-1,- 1).. 1 r tya+4.1 a r� } 5 / r.. .., ^ . .r - :, s_. ,.l iNy'+a¢nC a Y.s'z . .F lb.:4,41..'13§bi a ^+. , e.4. :: S*3•y{{il +J•P r , 5�. - sr,tM,° ;',..4.;c70 rea�:•' - _`1.. k y.} > >,te�7 "fia n- i : r 1 1tta 1 5 r• 1 ;Idr {1 i ,- K 2,:ci; . 7J_:;cite "` .t z S keP+., }t�ti n K`fn 7 1 s Y `"� ,, r{, vi : ti 1 ire air :; 17 y i t`L ,r `-r"o44 Myra y d" T..*3". 13 i 1'.Y'•;f T °:•;;, x rr ° r ni. 3 • P v acl :} i "r� ,k r r s ai y.,r I f yrt. A.11 1 a. - 1- (v `w^140 fir..'tar' ( r i 2 FC irs SaWie r i I i i f Af FW ..r4 4.,). r41 N t5, ,,----,70,4,- MY . 3-. A ' P,'. aS t j � 1":".:1''',1:,.1. i at"ti"k x 1 1 1 J l r' ! L r ', '� 't 1 M � I Z � 4 d 6YF �( i ,r yRw.,n 4.. yP l 5 9 I r h I ,>I "S • P f _ ,a, x'11 y „ ' • "`2T.xr tr`G:.a { 1 1 17 I I i,o Yt`f • r ri:sal+ Y I , ' 1 b 11+ p �y 9 cv' A x. ' , ! wd 4:44,:;,:„...,/,. 'rarer.. T 1" ' � ""'J 7t > -• ra �'' cr ¢y� 'ree .? +'rt r t f f kit l + ° 't�'�j t "T' sy /1 ��r r k t 2 ii�/tie� � ' >+4 *r 1 1 1 f Y'^:l. i�,x M1V' i 3 ub 1 .� r lI r,�s "L 1 ' rs ; a .m a 9 �xR' ''''''r.14 ,f t ! � vil I�t }M 4 iy �I ikS d r n �is^.1 u. r... 4'- . .t r 1 +`'r rt !rF} s qT i�§.:.r• 4- Slr- 1 s a h i ;Y,.y :j rte-,�,..ww - 4• ' f k:-r t . . ! rr - a� TvT4 1 "ik Tv-a rf i" µ?'h: kk t l,T .y i�"1,, :'" ' t ` I S . '� 1 te+'. r� G>e j1'✓ i1 4 n !S' tl v Y r - r xa 5" 1 ; 4.Y/ rn`"t1y� '7,4=.1 {' r. 1 f a 1k )) Y r4. 1 Yt y C-'}, t, :I I M I/1 I i'. p Y'� .!'.y.a f`11 y f f T. ITI 4 4t'144. SO fi d ' J 4 h t K-( � C ■ J r d ;LE 4 ,1 Ll l F.0 d V^�+ �Y.,.�f, r 'S i 4 i,a^ a-F,{,,i r r L'T5m 3 , yl tC 1 � "7!L�+�+ Y ca: 1 r� r } •"�+' .r-r3e-t71:, t- i n }-lK+� 1 [ � r (r fl,-.` t�31t jzy r�".' i` l S`ice �4d s- t A"� w+}hjrtT`1+..µS :u'fL}eN •}.2 • t.3.• aixa ?i t I b• y t �.i u. SA,.�+, I" "}ii #i !. . '+ "• Y '4yF ' ,y 11 d! y , Project Site y 1d • d' i !' F. y'1�'r(` t „ -n t e I r s r. - e.._J . ,102.' t I -pig' . 7 7ryt�+�'s sk"j Iray,„ .s P� II 1a1 YI � t L ;F � L i:2 ki 1G'r 1 � I l sk is - - 1 '43fy'°y�r,,1 J� ,�I' at,- •''� IA 1�r' 1 f. 1' N d1 1 1 �'7l '1 y ..1 LS -c %, r iJ?#Y ,' I T f t t r: ya r S f 4 • y a 1? r k e } y 4, s a y+'r v+c'r a R7 1 i r. •q x 1J a r c �4 1 m" g( •n I 8 t' y�� '6 n S Stti,lt y*e v I J. .s i« v '4'� 'f 2, 1 "�';. ,, I 4�N 4v fi`� (- '' . y 1 sk--Y q, 4 A S ^. i- i„']apt', 1hk,.4k+an WJ at.2, +1- -- "r -. f. A..yt, „if;„ c • ,.L.SS do.l .'- a r 'a,i.,�1."fi r �+��r^;''.ro�4k . ., � � t +;.min ]d t G 1 r - � t� 'n *"' 7`( �Y�(�'� .,.e,._ «. u.... zA t.r a rnn,;1_l axx --,i. S tt 3 M :yay a z 1_r Y 0.:*-c7°" )' V . d W -r� I > r 2C fi,, 3 Y '�J .¢ ct).F.'I y*.i" e 14:x', -�.> 4„1 4 r "T,.• kt t q D r.`^'- k3,r ^s r N i ., y- ,C - ,a E ai �Y'k , • ' 9, t"f'^. - y FI 4 t 4 f I N 1 p pJ ) .3k F k,l !1 1A 0.` Y[;T`^'•.11 'cz1 '4'r° �• a k" . vK=+.l..0 9 1 . 6 .nr <3"�.',, i :+i L , `i, l irsa f &•, k'..i y y ,`* S,+•" ]1.F7 '� 1p<t`tl ,erS m' a s+t 1 - F - J` nN ...ar ,2°s t t '-1 .z .I... 334:.. V"PI N rrmr„'.. ub: f t L�I..iui :*•' 3C u: .,wdM�11�'aT.:3 ,ss.-.TM�'ix 2^ "i" � G^. IyQ, i y51,� ..vmS.JP w^vzr vn �.�.z rl-��'-` Ida ''''i.: •"4 .:i ,' ]I 4111.t,,.i 1'9 C .6 q u i#�+1t 'g"14+.. y 4 i it 1.M a .n 4atrk �+ . r�Lvrt ! - , �% R ,j Y 3'7.41**". nLt' re -can,2 X i{L",.;r. '` 4 :. 3 et' ;re+4'w §la "4f t .t MI.ic•wrl _- t ci vy+`�3 1 .a 11,r- :I is ,rtINi til j' 1p y Iti 1 ..ei '� �} !�` 4-I � r t .{t ^t S ° Tt i z 1� i{ � M`�7 .J- I"dFl a x i Fra .� r`S'€°I R" a; -� , - � ? "v11,1". 'T. Z �P`vo- t )• sT1 i.1-& $,i4 a t Es" ., �* n ic3 £ ari � 11"+' cr � r a� mar 44� 2�ii d AJ7 9 i 5 Iw a. �'4}' r'"'v� 1� p � � i a e1i'` � � r3.�1 1� x� 1 �i,-..6..,rl F;Ny, � t��ti'A° Atl �3 C�1+ �'� ��Y... L, t F~• H � 7�bt1 FT.r { �� k•+ 1� y11(- V � •=-4.` j / 3 '..'. € � )• 1 Y e. t-s92w "'� t i ,4 �'� I le 7 '_r ,"p�� 1 u r¢ t J} ht �i uY F"*wr✓' 4 xv le :s �F v TKI��f '. 1 1a 'v�P IZ",f+�l.` q' �t� �rl � ', - e- �u. ly'p UPI gO W.k7 l7 , l ..CRAx_..n u`3 'gyp"T r`� . �f x, is nb-+.t °'4i�,tt ,am} 1 ,�I�.N 11f , �j� Q, 11 ,� _ 1µ �y �` '+�fi9ts�i�. ^� ,n� s sl a.at 7 �. a rti -,. K v 3 .. rre7 -- �L..' t r I 1 x. r A- "' a 1wt., tir I 3r 111) r t Y l ? .c-�+�a 'A-ro. � w f -'. h \ »- 4 Wii ��% 11v S 3 : 191F - :i .. ri `.WIN { aw et 41 s 1 n'�,a mss* � . 11YYYY `I . - �y W1 �Y _ y 1 yy H:".•!''� 4 �«ro �y` 6 ij ",1�u,3:�, t y. ... a F ¢ rr: t n1Y rr .5..., r :'Y a tt; Icx a.N 1' x'tti"mc, �ro Cyr'i( ! t1'IC c z Y' , it ,1Y ry A y _4 -3 .. .�°". li` -��ppp �r § � 1 ��.,,�� A t� ..- I..S�r w � �.E. �.> . � A Ypff ifi,r�i Fit'', a," . .1-‘11,--:.. � -bra +2 Og3`�^7 .-a . ,a.^s`_ N 4,...`r.u. t1 ^ a ,y. EXHIBIT B k, ` " = mi iri14t, t+sti,:., '.•" .'3`31m'=`I�i wi. L3 'a�s'Sv -5i i,„ y •e: = '�.�'>1bWQC�-a��•$'n• 18 _ ■ _._.�w�F� �.• �'b ��'' -n"t°�'�' IF.s»..•� a a • i I Eihtil i ia" _11'^�. + a-- iq • - ,, J r tiff li 'HI ._. .�j [ _ f1iJtj • r ,,_,,ma raarcT 7 .l+-"lql 1 r t. .s tii3dlina ' , n',r '.1ir� r f „a�ssud , s 9 il' I� ( ...._ • 1J 1,1--,11,1.11S.Y l tl 'lI rJY � fir•-- �'-`�a`� �i-1 ups'�I li r �; • It�� ! ' ��. _[ _a • 'l.:: 4,7 :-..1: Cr r 1°11 II: Frifir r, RI dF { _: ``11 t 1,, 1 tint r 1 9 .. �L r /I16 wl 6 �R tl rte. i 1u . a :r)-r . t 1 „13 9��$! e a II a ,�i kl • i— ,, . Ii rl F li;iy $g ia o` ---- I w R I M I F---', r rr°r r:P r vl : 'l LI !€ r � _I�I,��I 1, 'I , (, )PI M , d NI 11 I l� c'.= w �' f d I��r, r A. it r__— 7r '' +S lr ' '� '7, j , r ,I Qi '+.orl" ji,tra l ,444411 r r� ° i I I -_ 'IF ....1. -a.:- I[ ip r ' •t !�ara • 1 I . 4 I F .q tz, pp � iiii , m 1� ,I, niI 3 � S�I'I U' ki%r,H ,�l ( II �1lel e �) I an { ..I „ a I Ilti 1 1 I`r s T I{ CI tt '! I II t I I ri L IL` ±T^ 1xwl� eaF1 I •Ir. rr ..1 1 the 1{' - II iggy P iti : __ ti Ir t '1ql Ig . 1 . ax rl a. I]ljI d\fir I I r� IR 1 r�i f' tE+f rir Il:l� • I�`l, , I, yl I ;..p IS fl _.� r � `q � r .:Q Iss ' Orc rr l' ' i c1 EV 13a l .AI r , ( GGA �� 1 r W, , q, _i ,l ! I lr "I�kiii� I 1.3•14 rlr 1. rlgk : i;';ir 51 I � • 1 EXHIBIT C B & C- 9 i ■11171 z . i . i fi i 1 1 „Hi 21."_,,,,,, ti---,.., . ti,..._...k cv- .---- ----,I•I § i; ; : 1 ititg i II (..).'d —1 1 i 4rg VN 4 a -1----- --' i1=447) 111_ .: ' 11 1;11 :1 11 !i° lig i 5i a 1 , awmarimaa- , - fp., ,b„m __ f54. 1--i _ ■ ‘1: -..\-7-311aing!: - 14 1 -;,,k1,4H- ic , t, _.,, : itrasly,?1- i' •lic‘iE tr - ' !-2,1 lil. 1,il' lilliwi .z rt"P'1111),-', j‘ r R "Pililkiklm; 111:. ift 1 -,.- 3t5cr ' ' L.:- :11_,.:::---lic-"`" +"i Fi , • , l' 'ill ;7 f 1,-- . ' .1 lift . I 1: i r 7 -Ali i ,: ,. i mil p_____ 1 11 i_Ill _All 1 4 1-41 '21,--1 \-• Ili " 1,‘ ''': °:'11 r :I lit II 'El- ( 0 -1-‘7' --p -2,. , -41 _ L - ,- r.".10, ,,, i', li , ' 1- 1 I /LI ''..- , ' 1 111_ 4.-- id . 1" . 4 :1i ;21-, 1 ',I , 1 .7 r..., i i 2 10_• -2._-- i ,„:. _ :.44,.•!. f ti ,..-_)( ' , . .:. 1 , I 4! lift , ---1 r-- n -,..\. 'll : — _ - 4' - '.2.„ f. i l'i^, ' ,r1 • ' 1 7 1 . , , , --- 7 -3-- II - I I. • , L I -i, - z : I:14' !,1:', , I, =,. ,...-----......-- ; : 2 ,,,:„ ii, i , :,„ „ 1 f---'11 -4171 tH I ;1, ' rrjr:: 1.1 /11 ., ^ A ' *1.'•- 1. -;',.-L4i 'mff ,- - r 4,;„ I, ', 011:: , t: l■ .} 1-- aZ I , 111 1:14 i,In i 1 I ' '- 41 ; at-. at , -..,E-sigi 1 .;: :I': 1' .1 • it ii 11 (( Atli ,c' — /11-4, , - .`a,ilisimul,/` i :11 ilsbil ; :::', 1 i _.- 1 f , ,77 ------. 1 9 , --7:03litowase, L /riq,:r-.0 :1 Q ;:°, :, I 0 1 H _et- 11 , NE In. DiMiril I" :11:: 'It ski Ri‘„.—riktitall ill'i ,1-1.,,Iifli ,I, hi; isi: __I L_____s: ' ' ' last 0 . 1 ..a. 1,1 ' • ,,,,, , • ,m*411k. t.. r...V“......_..:__- _.-.- rt/i^,-111.1 le‘ 11 I Wil: 111: p La 1 i , a -jel), t___ar._- a ...,,,« ■ 410 ,41 ., 6o 7- 11fr- 1/4"'"' "A 1 LAE i t.‘ nut 1 ri li „ ?, --E-, 1 1",1 JO At re.• riir Ft ill 1• ( J'I lit.P - +1 I:1111 1 1 ‘1A - `-- 4' 1 141 1 1 1 1 * Hifi rirl 4 i ,____ .2",__ "1_ __ _. II L' 47 ,11.1 i :sir, Ey , nay i 11 i- ' ; - " _x ' iiikA, rt,. . t t ) ,,- i xi Ix r. , -• r, 1 ...sir Iv. , ; fW ct . I al tc.voi,, i '■, ,, , ltyp., g.,1 , i ',..: 4:: 1 'I •• , 4 --I i.• .' ' I mill r ' I: ll r •_L 11- 1 7%11.1-1 r111/21 •ita .. ' 4,t0 1 :, r °lilt 2 1•1,1, 14 '1/4..t.' . ;•: "'I 1 isel it'' ■ g,t,ir a 41a-___• q•k • inift 117: 1.-- , •rd. fra„,... ii,. , .0 It t— -i '1 '4 r, .• 1.4 . .,...... _----z==...- -,1==,i--.,,-----r--tt ,, _,,,.._._.- , ,...,..,...:arm-r, 77,71 .- i IL -- , ,----R - i -; ffklIVI-19-k:- lc' 's, in 1 ! ''' -...-2-.2.,;'2. --2:72.,■ =.2, -2...,,..,k, 1 r .,tla iv__ -.2 , ,r•,.. ota: Lt.' ,. r - ::11 , i , ., L-___,.._. ,..- :...-- : :., ..r , .. (4 2-I ri" ' Il b ' ' I: .' 7,4 I 4 40 , I • I % •\ ; 1 it 7 0 , I : I 1 EXHIBIT D --- ,i 6 1 '� I i� it I ' 1- y \ ',: 1 i !!j ; 1 i 11P d o1, I �� EI ! .li ( i1 1,e , 1ll ii III _� !i 1 l oE' • nl• :I!IIFJ11 41 1i _ 1 • r1 ,j,� 1ii?: I 1111 i;i !' i B gd '1;' �! 9i It "s !Pgl t ! Fl. ■� ; I°, ; fill i 1f ilIl119iI I� ! �� li :; fldoi 1 �1 i : ! 'a-,2..apr1 i i!i[ibi111 i! mill! 11 Irtiotel,...h!!!11 ;i1 111!l X 11 1 i ..... - ..� 1• :. . . u. 1a es .. .... r�l§i ,. .1 !ELL L r _ X. � s i 44 >` t t -ate l 1, t —I I ' • ,a All I I • !1• .1 1.1 4.1 Q 0 III j 4 P " S " } a . 111 it ,c : : t1 1 111 `� fir f' 1 .4 �1 � 1[ ltl' i- L Is ., �� l I 1 v {� < i1, ! a 1 r i ( i t1 dGTdA3A at ;,Iv "'[('s� �i::°0 1 i ! ��„ � Idr' ,,ii, 911 -, 1 1 1 1( ��. � �4 i^: I' -I, {• tP ire w. lna (i i P ilIti� . 1 3 P nlIl� ,l, It Lin ; f aa �i � t in , 'V , c, ,,l, - III,' i �e: i;�Ei9ill� lila PIE its __.-or!'ld �,1 VIII; a ., y . 11.4, .4,— ri � fr ' 111: ..R;A 1iteifiliiillt! iiiiiiiiiliP P P l i1� �tlY ." .tl ti. ❑ � l t1 V't 1�p I � 1lf�ltl v Q1, I 6.w lq� 4 1,l 441� .,11‘ 1I� 1� 8' 1 iij1 ._ -4i1 -I �C je,a EJf ! : , 1 1 s ,.q 111 - (A � €4 irt l 1 q P I ie•ll 1 51.II • 11! !°•3i l i i e fir 1 1 - 11 i.i •.t�tgiiib'� 11 1{,II i ;' 1 1111 I P I 111 iI '1 { !�i' l iil1E111"1 I� 9 Il�f1 e! t! �l�p 1.•! f•• I 1!c 11 �11i 7 ,>,v , of I PE.t-ll tqr i l�! iii 111 it i,Q th II 61 F!F! 1P 5 11 e ie! �I11 • lel 1, ::' Plllii hell J q,,� rr 1a,,�= �1� 1 1{ 1 :see; 6 15 11, I! HA PI 1:1, li it �', f� 4—; E 'A�1�I F1i la I I At-,- s'6 f ' li, 'l!i !I? !V i1 f; 4 11, :ii' di �,`Id' it a irgthli! Nov #+ 1 1 r 1. a .t1 i" 1 51 i ; 9 t3PSiL1 qt g :I : a vi� ph' Igli 3• 1:a pi' , 11 o i! s t !16 e3 .4„,,e2., n�ylltiti�1� '4' ! !'tlyj�{g, I i 1 1,IJ f f Iii ei fe.• l.� p1 r �e 3° ! 1y ! .P•i • I� 1 1! 1... If a 11' 1%/ 151! ii 1 1! 11 co,lt8r y� :0 1,Si lilt i-1'.. c __,f� I r , ,r ✓ 1i1! n .E 1 ill 11 ifi 1 . 4 :III! e 1 1t1i71F: r T ' I 1 'r'�IiIn d 'it FI ri i1J 1i i 44 1 Ii 1l. 1. 1• [ t id :ii!%i i b1 1 jib 61i 1... 1i1i1 1 91,:!1 il1F ill iiltl Iili1 !1 4 1 1 t , - 'll q�' IIIfHt ; f, 9 t Ill I� t S ■' • ' 1 4 Ill 111 III h lw,a ' ` ft ' , N it"1 1 , 11t tl; q ..4 N I) tl q,i to,11 1,F lllllllllllllllllllllllll ®I j' 1' 1 1If111 � i 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1i II' tf" C -='"--- -----,,,i 1 , I Ili i1 Ifl,1. `7 111 - "1";:i■4IlltL- Q1, a1n j - '1r�1 y q If II` 1 { itiiit Ifl i t'1i - dill .1111 1 �p �i I'll , 71 11 t / 1 , I 1 I1P'{ '1 I; i 1°i rl 1 E1 1 u If �I n di i:,' tL: 1 tY'Li y l�' 1,P ��, „ „ ; � Ipc� ,I 11 „ i't IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i,l) ,,t4 t.,�1 � — ' 11 ",, llllllllllllllllllllllllll 111151, II I 1 1 1,l 2 1 1! i4"I..4.-' 1,$ ,� , i, ! f41 aka 111�� T/�" 1 i. I�E11 ' �- a ,�111 i a `1" IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII: tic =11 itl '9 '� ;+ glA I ell ill, 'IIIIi 1(.4;1 „l 11111111111111111111111111' I,1 a_ . s' 1 1 11III%” JI it 1�' 1� I 1• I B & C- 11 P d .7—i 0 0- f I I°3 I k i a • i 41E5 U13318339-?197IC LWV to,. , � e.. �- _ .g in a.g •gi X 3'4 31 ="'fi T C , �. _ r 1 ,�� a. kt `R �!I I c=£ i :f I � - 1. I 1 M 1 i '� � 11 a.? t a, �.�'.�I�I P I I •�. I .g r 5 E.. sg -in. g '1 II '1 II 1 5EE i 1 , 1, V• t Y ` f .4 I Is ` �,6 t�1 I I i{�1 u.24:::: ,I �I1 Mint t �G ��J� Y� b�.Ilt„l li, f. N7 = j'` �'i:r 0,.a 0 I M + l t I p 1 �f c� 11 li lit .= f l`I _ .< jd / .Y ..-s 11,: . i.: ^JII r14atL �I I� i” , - I _ ic".3: 11 li I ! I tj :II 3 a i"6 : .h { I ills �I G�I 441 f L1 t1 S 9-33;'7 .i._ I I a ,a _ 1 .3'i 1 I/i, J! I l t I1 _i _ I3,.g kg ' �g .4 I.g'. i •g' !1 i' II g ,� 01``, - ' 41 1.r•1 1 F- I is,1 ,i Ill L"d� S t (c : : I 1 • I I i{ A ,7444,4-5,1-...1: I . a. 11 !i1 if tp t• 144,0';: 1 a u9 ( � }� 'r} � 11'It I 1 ¢�41 �a r. t 1 ��" r S ` � t � .11 g .t �CJ �1 ' IF, it f i a ti r41,rL+, "A 1 .g Ili ''•.g 1 1 - .g t, `0I I 1 I I. I uiei E Ikr�-IIi 7 ,:; t f!. y . 1 I 111 yrl i.'• ' I I F -I✓g g \ 91 •\ g q 1 i1 pl 1 t i�I NI.. \ � 1 ,\ • h_ Ii II� 1-/—f � il_.' I 11 ii)) ' iclil { � I! I� .tIIt (. III o , :Ili [d I t t'h, It�. __ la l of i __© L. ay _ ' l1I IJ�eE fali {II f Il oqp 11 is L r ' I 4. ! d (A- . i i 1 f { '1 i1 4 '�rt .,.-3 4I . I ty -, t; tE I a 1 ` 3'= t g ��IP 4 i I I I i f 1 t I r a 11 U —1 �� r.Ga ' 'I I. 1 '°Y't r!, 4i ioll fI 7 x1.1 1' 1� 1i 1 �,� 1 1 I`I'I' J';'ll� ,� II o, � + � 1 �� >!� I • 1 l' � it 1i i, 11" J ^' � m I 1 I 11•.�IYeacias 13 1 yl. .e"I .y d �' ` t �7 1 1i I��t�!f I [[ft:,I+r t: I .g 4 1.11 .'}It g., .g , 1.3.,g �1 ilk. E �, , i11rit1 ' mi�, �l �r I�,' - �0 ®" _0� II O - dos-s61I �p� II? i 'F ll- mL u r �r� a ..s. �'� y`+ , IA 6 - tl 1 III ' IL, a t "--rtmr T y„a 'Air t_Ate uA�"CO"e'PA® k1 L:-',„-- 1.I ilk, 1 - @ ve , SI I fVJ�IY �- .wen... i ?AA!' 1.+ :I q iiitr U : L 1 `01 � ` 11 I I 1 py =I V �TCI'.F7.. Y ' s� 7 1��II ,- :17I -1:-,1 cr }�.ae.¢v E/ • I i �� R 11i11 11 1 x i1:: : s I A . .�.+,, 1111;- ti ) ,, 1 3 "_. 'a..`i!.� f. Ihij `. il1 II 1114.,1 I1 B & C- 12 P a� kilill ' I ez 1 1103 t gv F e 3 1 x ,n • ^4 I'c "'— 1. •' i 'i , 5 5 ( ( 1 1 �' Wit' _, � < _ .n--`7,1-, ? �i IiI! '.r 55 II'I r y • 1 1 ('/ �{H'�vs / b 1 I , � i `I 1 n 1 ��f 5� I f 1 �aL /.J. I�d'�';' ti ;. r 1 Iti iY ; t .. Vrdq I,3, Q '; f s; °5r, : t �"51ll�l^]+s,,A� �I° f I t � � ' .-„,�� . /. I !� I E 1 I Tp: t t y lY �� 5 i i e , — �. 1 I� II�II�iit4 �l (iM �. ' - ''45` 1�. _ v 2 � i 11 lid '1'I{� -' 4 iV. s Cam ,... t w cI i L _ : ?� 'AIIIJ 1 �5 4y J'°j VI, -t i.r• �Y01 a • i I - I 1, ; II•I , d 1 �I� . Wr I . li 1 i II ,tom \ L t I L ! 1 / ' d /I �',� , `.� )kl �1\ ` ) ' � 1yi i �i '�fJ � J,�i �I{ I II i iir I(/ �• i . o�. .Cat-,i i ', FC f- ®d I n , 3i D 11) • r 'A 1 J ,� �anI ': ° 1 ` tP4 �eE�i dI' /si ' ( 11 'l �� 1 I 1..,1 `4 �'Ll,: I i FI ':Ell I; Iii'a pp� 1 s '-ii' .q r '* "� III ' :" Y tt rinl �1:qty I P I •�kl,. py� i i J G q '.II *t. o tl� 5 I �� I1.It� i�'1 �ii1 { .� 4-•=,:.,,-;—:,.,,' ., v I , l i I i a Ili l Ikt �` " t� 'Ir- • .. 1—+ -�i Ii :ti�� ' I �b �+(� a 11'l�l �p�c ill: lei ' +'5 ci �-¢ t 1 I. I II I li J `� ,,'ti p Ar. -i 0 > rI I� 6, V I�= �ts '''4 ,1 f ti i k, O99II D F1 i1 -, 61 all [ ' D `1' d r 5 Y i. ;;;;!:7,7-1-1, , 91� i ( •r. Pi I I F6f@ I : (E5�Ei > I \ ! b .., d 5 -1 .';'./71.9 i s / 1 '45 f P a i2 , APt I i Ai3 i! . ` •i a .`4 ',, 1 I•� }. 'i - p.4" x r• � 11 ' 11 I� I q. , , . �I i I M'S_ � 1 _ u d 1 7t` l ' ti& I f l� �` ' 1 Jam; 41yi !C. . aaesg-w11aLw B & C- 13 i o e ill,,i 1 ; kV4 A. g 1 1 II1iiI� r i - I� a./� i ca ill i i P. 1 .i I IiHH I ell If 1 M it SF ' 4u ! gi 1 Rg� 21 r ..lid - P^ _. p 1 Yip • '''''' s ' . �. E X21 g 111 di E '° q �� ' i ,� W € Ole 1 � 14 __ _- _ ... Mi a 03/4k. . _ s$ 1 " ', 1 Isjp =H.,: 1 � Ii } FI i 1 iii r�-- • I I .-rte- s I l i t , { f ii9si�ef 4 1 1'3 II iiitliiii', iiiiii� !?!iiiii I - ! 4ip :� f l E c,,,,---7.:`, { 0i _ I II. I. x ssn ii sws a, __ x---- �f- ,,,,,,I=.-- p r,a...c... - asW _ r Q `' '�' ' .� r ,� f � of ;it— ' 'H�•oc I..- - I iiii, - lifill i' Le— -=---- -/ ---' r=1---ntr—— 1 l3n7%�gt • ��i� $q� ( ��e4il U I1il _.i it • _ �II -�-� �� 111 I I p NIA IF J i1 B & C- 14 i r -I MIMI NOM 71.. .riat:::ihiA ' '1' Fkir:IVI:j ...■..........”......... .,,,,,....,.., 77777soRaevarg *r7r.y.:1,!..7,7,177-7, , --- ———— _... ,, 0 1...11 I ' r'. ::.1..' 11.1 r.! .i r-4, ) I i. .7 yli t,,, r,.-y) .:l'.. !6 4,,..}4. 1 1 :4„?!..,..?1, 22.:.!,i-,.. .: -; 1-! '--"; - !r :.-:-.:_ )..?I irk'::1: 1 -" -- i 1 Inig.ill is, il!'''M71"!1 1,1111.:4!, .. .a.......... . ..... —........ 'Irt•tt.H1 -- ! ! ki ,. IPA • ■• .._ ....................7.1...LIns ra,•--7.1fr..A.ta=^...- --s--.. --- I,, :.Lisa 1 I . 1 ' ! Ua.,:- r'Lid ',il m .... s...................m....... —...- . rAell ,IIMI 0 t.;.,.--..-7----,. _it, I IL ...-.1'. I r . .....„....... i"d I:,-",, c ,:r, ■ZI...=_,.......,:. " p•-■.7.-.±........, _, ,„tip! k 11 ---z---.—-En !....■mts:re i!!!..:,!•41.1 .1 — ------------ ........................., lit' —..... '1'.' I ea. a=miasma...mm=0u, _..! I •J:4,1,11!it ----- 4,,4..11,t, %sr-'accir-aut-k!4*.kniiimiill ..` filifttial 1 - ....----........ ^r...-..:_-:----"....--.,c=y•-•:--.-..- 1 1 211 I i:.:-.-.N.I.',I■. • ..........■ WT , m..!■,.. --ss-■—-s LI A•^.--i i . illivrr.1 1 t I.'A'P.i.... "bin !sr' I 1 '.., i 0 ..■:III 1 •11- ..:,..',- ..--- (,,77Cen---.______ 7._ 7■:,-.tn --"4,1 il ---------- i.1.... "t 1 IA.:till a D--a a, -,,,,a,„,,, , -....--- , .. ,,,p,•,, ,il I Zs..wal `VIMMIllier•••••—• i ' ll r ,i; fL 1 f'1141 ii :1:::—...- arrigarnsaintarrai. ruin. -',1 fire, -,.., .. 1-'.., ,a-, . 16----.. 4.11ar.:;,111,1 -_------. :.-..s w.,..... .. •2.——4,4_,=2^...2 11,:,a - J '4,T,,,,:ma.,....a.a. L .4 " .aiai.-„..all', ic' 4titli'k P4 -tr.-- 1.1 2:!" -L.:4 igagnigaltikratili!atE111.4i !;..ed ---Jr litalf”•••••••••■ ss■ .... r .4', il IPI 9-4:11 l':-. ogiNt;raistar ..--,t ,g- , ,,,, ,,,,. ,....,(:' w„.6„,,,,,,, i. _ L- •, ,, ,,,i} - ......_.............,....__... nn ----.... 1113;;_4.....N., !•*!..■!.:::.1,1t---=!±--.=r_-_-= TISIVI.I'Ws 411 ] 11111W—= t.1 ni 7;i:'11i•I ..■mnammee p' 1 , ktl!!I - , ' !!' ..1,:.[ mama IIISC"T 14e1181 'lj•'Lin it r U4-1 ; 11 -- re:r..t.:,..7.:.--...:- 1.1. 41. Lt• ill.o..111W.ML'AIRIAPZ".v.Ill 1,117h 1.1.4, * linIt a;iCeiaiiCorlar:r traiiiin:s ill L'' rgi, '''''..' :-IiiiikellnligS010101111011. I . 1 Iligaa.,,,,,,...,k. ------ :4„ ., _:....-ca -• ' !-T,ana„q.::.! . 0 Ili ....-1.4• i;.?1,t142 ilitg la -;.-.9i,fly.,1,, ::: it. = = el .1 ,....., 1i ..,711.:iiht 1.IN '31 " ..v.(-- at .,:vvir: •-:- -Sea .111ftlail .71 r nil"I..1' (-1 W li := E E 13 = • =.——= i =.— =— 11 ' . kill p II+ ..... ss ..... . • ■ s _ r F.. 1, ,I. it ,, fr . fr) r.lt,, i , .,-..-,-. '1,1 iltaik,,,11. ) IIIfr - .\, :r. _ ---- :,.-r.,L tr i,,,..,ar„.:.'0, .4_1)m.III% .1 .. ..:"!. 114-3!ro.m.ronsF•mus."5.0".... , ' a', lia:„.st,:t,a;in kiliai ; i.....:: :air.i.;_i...;:s._....,:— i irk'Illn.'r a r.'Netraw-L .7141_ -L., I.E. 1 A 4' pia .1 fi I ." ,ll'lit . - ..._.a._E.... a•.=__sa_An.. a. a. ...■.■ lg. P414% • . 1 i i lip tlik-L. •. _■a:_ is s•...■_._■a._s■s '• . - .■.■ lir . In f • tt sibia. mai' _.110.4., gn,;:44111.1b, I41 . .. - ---=-1---s. 47112ii, 4-ive- .1'3.,‘•10.„, ,.I.1 1 ..,„,.;:„.,_,,, irp,,o, ,,,........, • 5- " fit.-.1 11, .),),;‘, I ii.kc.r1.:..,i1,, Nagai 1.11',,,,i.1 r7r..a..timwri) 7 ""P:t.,..'ite-ii--=%.1'4'4"."74 spiv . 1.....--.1.-- ,ft11,..i tit ;-',a=„,..4,51/2, la r-,, 7---..7 —fl fl la'r,/"I Mu ,:, ..,0:,ujj b•erct 1?'! 1„-"ral " 1' ''''' ''""*.CH ! .!! HU,. .. NfrI .."1,-.. :i IR.fil Iti/JIM t, N -00 441 Bill -can --- ff.L:J... . .-ciEr .J.L.___ - =., :.::.! -_. _,. - - - — iminitiminunfainr. pirry./di =, nlenal iritzswiroriniFfairi. ,_ ...• EiRli ... ---------.—... mr.r.—auwaga;—act siprANNI POICERitaniC PO"' ...toms ba ant as.ma,flat,L.E.ra an. ..................... ... rtaSIZET&S.1.-- iks 111111■SIEddril ..ra,„,..... ... . -------.....---- Inaire re I. ,L..,„_,IPPI.E.AP 0,1149te Mr r r.ingN ASESSORS ra3.MAWS .__--rori,7--67:41,7747.17.--'—^ =;-°•.:Att" MTh OF 114, .....n.n 21:-...^.=.7.7,:::Zr..a-7.-.=-"*"' 0 sn.^.•■•-..- .................................4. ..... PREUMNIRY GRAOWG PUN ---...-,----..----s-s. -----.----...-.....-■ MCIIIIMMIN • .--Irrnir..t.•.r•-;-"s=AZer....•:4, ------ Coisat Burrow -- --• -=.7.77.:--.L.---:-•- ratr..t.-....., - MIIIMIWICSIMI 18122 •------------ .,:..„ r....;=........--, SEE SHEET G5 FOR Itm.it tbilEMEL2CL.„ .11-1: livr-Liv - ...2 aw------ .----- CROSS SECTIONS/DETAILS tz.-_.-_-- ...say!,:Litt aa 4 ■INI14 •I EXHIBIT E B & C- 15 i )mitt&1K ----devotr• 4.- 'Afil wir ailbra-e—aw 9 44 .j err. #% —'� imp lt . ' ! ,11iiivilltwerallwasefi eir act al u�� , „ 14 Araigloll 0004 i`��. 9 ..i wRy” r 711niS�i. ,,-.sue- ►. +. ! II 1.,-1--.---..1/44;11illt 6 ii.:=Wrisitterplir ifilirramosalMil T T l il� � � ll�1 �1 lie I i'I l �i® 11 Ql i: * tyrl- r IA •!! 1. .. . 111! I_ _. a "^ � :d . � Ai + ,.II®r - , .., ,r.I � I �v ij 'a- * .'-Dirk.cla -a• _1 01;%:arirr; traneatill,0...-;or EmP■ mi �� 4t1,+ ..w Jai .. �!� ,I, isor -may.. i ::101 F -aVr assay ;_ �a�'iiy 7. ~re _SIMIIIIWF4• es Or-- It I e r ' rm .,,> `s'� a/ erk II ,. cia a _ - 8R30/- - s it • ,I, p ,....r I wrzaws FRELJAIIARY GRADING PLAN DS II n ~ 18 0 IIIIMPIIMPOOOMINORMIIIR Fa uEGSW)NESE&71 ap 6 & C- 16 • • - r ` , 31d➢h!'-1L`-:%1 - d "11 -s_.J!�o4 1 __a\st,"......a.d(i-.,0 /;.-7ii—.CC-0.3-P_,-I1,L"_" ol 1'I kt 7 ."� /\ Q._•. i jr 'i'4'�,( r^M- — Imo_ f ' =isW:s • i tea•' �d : ,y ty0 ^ por ,,, 7�. lid. IN p J p er', /ftiW' � I e) __T. ,\ sib 1 rI ' `p ' y •1 oiL, a•' . i� ti as rj � � 4 ....1Eilifil•- • • ..4-tax I.-4kt. - --•• an-Iasi — - 1 milt la !.u'�'�,Y • 'I 11,1 nLl C. )1I ) i.4 is n Ant� i � 'I , i � � !yi � � II I iii _ I ,i- _ .orAtig,:t we ze4 will.i. A \'or ... Jila,1211r,d* JLc1i?' it 1 .1∎0 ..tea.. ��_• /rte .fiL ntiliiiiirrinq iii iCil l SF I A. iaMr , r it ' --�f r 1I 11 ^ n Ali VIA - :s1 '�,�� 1CL!"7�� r t�.irrta �.' °•l�:i... ;Alai, t �4: - fie _ - - 1.,___A tra f ice .'° //��\\ M2 Cr WP t I v PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN MOS • No 18122 EEESEET05FORCROSSSEC►IDN TANG 1-` •• +°'�+ ",... y - ��sS B & C- 17 � in �i Ihi!ililI 11 _4,1,10 a !a , , . � , Strietr- 410 - . rpliLipabrgidsiesail... .61,,,iwt„, ! • 1 afl. qrs. •. ' aill r_ lis , An f69! �r Nl5i� ..v. ,:ip.,, - .,. i . 'aswr Siff rd®Vi..• A�- - tirrestiallgi L- riFfir. ).___ 4 : - .Mimi -1 reninX, 13 I .� ��i a _�IJ._17� i? 1 �i i Ns i� `'• __•_ u &i1 _ Wit. . _ ., ss.n ' i -r i 1 air t, ,f ._ ; I•tanner' ti x,.._ � _ ., i.. .r —.I .fer'1%z•4 r iMir ./R ; i t r a w YDICINI PLAN rORLEGBiosffslEErr► I 18122 •IIIIIWZNICTIMIIIII .r..ao�rrr r s�sten FoRcR ssaEcnaarq.s 44 1 ', _ .�. ,. B & C- 18 q ... r z I +e c _ AIPMF Mw g 8 E u . 1 -10 —. f _, a I . a. li�� m . awn. T"- i mmtgrmmw — .--.. -. 2=4 � � OM . *f► � , PM' t 1W. i I- ■ '- .r- 111M112 j!—mw I i . "tar ..• rat" I= El MOD ar�a I an en aa, j _._____ a .=.r ==•a-- Uni/MMQ 'wan... OIMMaMINI ratsnas se La Y LOT 1= °—° YIRA AMP{IW °° A•'b . _.__ • '—° .:.- _ ss-- — ' .w.pal MOMOm-IY 18122 ..� y :"Yw' c t tot C- �9 e. �wwI B 7 -1 ....CS 4 Y)i 1 0. -I S'i•C i t c.C 4 S I V H 1 1 1 1)fili..f•Li; MW.111 g. 7 r-.-- ,0 r r,,,M17 • 24 , ----',--' " li r ri, ' ',.=,‘•1,/'1 '',N 0 rit ■---Is'c (7- ....1171-... . til —.——— ------ -,_ . 1-, "M3W-RNAji•Cg`r, +.4,- -,44±4, I f 3 Hl, -—-“-- • Pri\ rc fi:••",kr=rk.ii):t V)- ,11' 1 ' ' ri .1','- 'c...\'2 •clir. _I ..;;1, 2_, ), af leciz 4- .4,4, if 41 f 1! *f 4"•-- sm.... ... " 1".■. •ncs•• ••••• r17 ,..„ crillpiliiiiioic ko i rm.-. 0, i.:.,..:,* re. I pl,k. 1 4 — - ------ ........... ,,,' -4at,' - 1.i L., .-„1 4.51‘. ill \ l'i,I,Ve - •• .il 'A )1,, 1.11 i ■ ......-.. =.--r-- :11.7=-1.7.;:t....arc...... Vitt,.1., . •. .. lip i ...! . 1..-._ I it.,..1t ,4i,../. : 1„ imi .... ----v..... it al "Il",," •-..i lialiii2W654•4111.Y.;4-,iatma... II, r ii.2 i/Ifj;\I Ii .."—....,........— 0 --..- ----....- --- ; .az-_-_-=-:.-r--- 41 ! . I ,1 -------—a' -•••"--t..--.1r1"! 'VII SliC ' ; Igo t' I t'I\ -......-- anaemia lafaniaan.11 1 I ), _11 fa ,?- , ,,-, 27' In, t in)I` • 4 I‘: i ....._ _.. __ ....................... __ -tn..-- I-, -,,- 4 ,, , k-s,,) . ., ,,arr .,-iti 1, , gna 1 44i,... .,, i: - 1„,„. ., iii ? y : -IA) ,. y, ___ I — ..------- Q-fg:4; -' - -..:.. ---' .---P---.11 ;rye. .10/1 V I _ 4 „„),.. ,:r.:MICTI:: , .. pi-nlii-oiVe.:14.111 ela-Sl11 If 4 N .M.T.ITM.-.7-"?..1.."="•12:-..:M.s."."1 ,.4b--..Q..1 , 2 1 ,,1•1\11 • 1 •I tls if f.1,--d". _oil 44, If --- LOT la SliiIM =aril ' •..........''' '......••••"•••.. 111',.t, r,_,--‘,- [ I ''b)• i - 6, v.;,....vx,„,...7y, bruiviiraacrecirE7-gast 1.114V, ilikeil- r _ I • . ,I I :I' 1 IA. ■ G.---...=,n- .--.. --:-.--.-.L.' ..........................- — ti.t. . NI„i an AM i I A', 1 iilz,--1,;4ft 11‘1 1 i ...........-..........- el iNitij• 611 . ---.1 I 111 044 l" I Id 1 .1 °:''''.---- atrainnear '."1"."..n. 'i 141 fi,:-.."4• AZ••\• -4 , • ' M--.-. -" ' il ' 14 i, . •.1 1 4 . 1 1 - .- WA. an=ria. . i irs.....wini..,......tme.z,..2”....nr...rallontJ ie INN • : ..........--un,sa..... 1, kerranwitgaisvaaait, . ..4.2.4 id .4I -.--- ,-- go' pii -I . . --rtiy- , i -sri ' - i,a fr'bknik011344,M.11, L, itt:of . —...}... ........__ __.. .....--_,.. . ik ',.. --,--,tyr: ,..4,,„Ji,frt•r,..,.-0 pi,,,,,... ),, cl 1 , nit..c......_____.,..,.....,..____ • .............. Innata :•.—.R ... ..=.7---- u pregrowlimitifeli. 1 i tri„ert.e. .0 1. kr- 40:. Ain LiK i 1 ilithnlbr.: li .1•11 IPIth.er3. 1=6- sr I " - -4 "oiNi.s.ta - 1 1 '' I ' 'r...1111Z..art:FA, ‘ ,. ' i , I aurcr.,4. lt, i.mL . .ail i ..t.' -419.1:. d riMILIWIAIALWIMIWIJ 1.' - i,t,, 1, i ■1111■ .■ 1 CIEL)‘41 nM74141higi 1 a ma a a as a am ma a a ima a a aa a a maw a ..." •.a -. -. a a .n. I ell- • 1 CWa.. -Th=•■■•■■.:Zat- 1, ' 'l • 141t11 r! 1611:5W41)-gen."71;i1171111 -1;1.11:41111 H ., fp ,A il, 14 5 , ri II 1 -7 --Z- . . .7= 7-- -_-- _ _ _ .7 .7 .- --- .7 ,,- i Jiagoir:rrognr.,,pri:lament. i t 1( -II '.'I ' 1 -.1,;..a.-illru :,:ir-c-iir-ogithi:70t7Azimiireu _, , : ! 1 -- - — — -- — --- II iplj'ai irollig li DO 1,‘ 11 kirl' 1 gil weirs ,iiifq ,, , , I?,,. Liz,i ,„,,,,,„......., LI_a z_■ (Ligklir. deljlgli \Alh,, 0 illilil'I' I 4 ar I PA_ ,1;:ril . 401 I I II 1. It • .d.• •... .....,.,..4„......6,,,h.....- ilika .. ,r.„.. , ...„.....,...,_ ...,,,r,,,,........ch„...„.„.‘....4, -.. ..---- spirr 7E--(--- — --,,, ..,,,, 1 is(-,, froctsem ic,---- il rammul.muci_ ku.a-i="rfv. —.. rnvo,r.jsti rad tem it “ tuft,(4,,.. t4,,,,,.. ., rs.. ,...,iiiii....,r .1, , 1, ,r 1., rani •,,, i 5111.,....._ .igr.,11 t. • I 4 W. ' :-.-t. 1 r.0..\ 1.1 k r t.•, I rj ra. .-:..-. ' ...-40Porfc, PRMEMY WE= fa.... .4•■••• ._ 1.Mla P.n. irimaniratunia. 11.11".C...^17"...M.....?.7.11 r.,=...reft.nr.z. mat gul=r,--% 11 %111111 ---1%-.7.7.-- ,...:-.....„..,„„+„:.,......r.„,„7„,:„.,.. in.a..:- i Inn. I IV t.T.C...... ''' ...........,.. M.11.1mMberur...rt/orm ry.r.n.-.=..rr.T.-..zazrz-riraw.,--- ,:ezr..,7,77vgrrtz,vrntrctrz.,,,..-r- el— ......—........— Egrat w is,_ estill . =mars latla PLIOERS _nel°7•4 '" ra-arl-- pot SF WP ea -.1.14=.71.7.1"..:=7:..."1.74.7.1:4--- 0 cenc.,,nc•••" ..... -.."‘"1-•-°"'"-n1---- PRELIWARYVOila%ICEMAN -...,--......--- orkwyr....7r-t=7,:re--:?-.-- ,•°' 7 . ■ toss .:..1==.--17-17::. -------- Gat mermen .7.-rair...7 arzwgivirr II_. atir.m...:-.-7,..w.e.mr.----2.14.1.7.11L'It.' • - 22.4..7=7.7.7..=..... M1101111WICSIM. 18122 - -..„.=.„,........... SEE SHEET WF5 FOR 11* . .....____ .i,..,..I sed,Iniltilwrr...s. saw 1 EX H I E3IT F ._._......_ CROSS SECRONS/DETAILS , . I Ilal 6 alaa____i B & C- 20 r 1 -,I Ilk:—i JN , mss- y u4. i i µ<.,-1......_�' e� Jt^.. a J. --�_�.�._, ar ._/,F" :,y,4—�-"f 1-• -/ L �lC-(�! air::::;..,... ., i 1 ee..tl.1.i / c�... '.a f f� //Y�, �i�?\Y�lJ .�I. .4 a, ' _ �1 1 �/ 'J,"..J�, ,,. !-' .y'1 t c(--"{�/ ..ice J� 5,. _:_i_ � ivrc+-i ii? 4 /� -"iJ P /▪ �1t _ I'a,mut ,%. ,.. a.�.� ', i __fix., /��.� ` I trz -.'" , jP 'x\t 1."..!=---' s :s r' 2%=. wa1 �J'i�,a�!+r?� -t®'u e:• L ti'rr L.- ,T,i` 4, . " ✓ri t s pm 1t....t ,:m�ie-E- I.- — t J i 't om.J ..�# , i4 f^, 1.3 I s ra E a t e c`�r. Ft, B 1I Si I/�1 �' /� 1 1(� - _, u..,^.J /�I -t-'°•tat.L 1 -itc r � J�fyJ I 1 � � .(ee Y i . •4•_.L\ , k9l w+r r1 �' _ 111 . , { Uy . i t �-'+ { ® rJT Y f �. i�' t�. ; M _ �SI.I'1 i 1� '............„, I.0,t,.f nn vr} t 1• ) ,5,,,--1.,,----,,-- f a„ —1 -in; ,{ I ,-�„ ,,i �u.L.ery .... a M� ..,„ ® .t r ... �. -_mil-E{ 4 .{. �,. .._ _ ..r�a J I, c { i - K J =---f-!-...�I _ 'i-c� 41 /eel. 1.rYL' y J-•N• i�!'%{ I (;/ ft sY �i i } . _ /j7,,,_ I.C.:. ,Y h��r I ,J' ;4 ;.CS .'.` r �` y s. R 4 f O.. I�'SY J ' .d ' 1 Y{ Y wl ' J , ;:(1 .• 1'-' T:-.1:1', a '_. .I * i;, / 4if tiL-k r gt �.J t'a' i . t �-� 41 T�,14% _ ._=-�- or; s , - =_,.r_. .9 ' r, , -4—� ici (� -� t� , R i s 1� ��„ �t.�4 t „per ' a..a ' ,4;,;:5 x Y i e, ,-„a''`mJ_..� ^C -1?r.,. ~ ..,u$ t.Y...- . rs, sF• ▪.-c' -` 14 - _--x j ,,w. .-- _;�.i :% w.�e:1 jI l� f '' r : 1// I i ' I, , I:( - f ae _�_� ' /r} �� ff �� j � i J':-'...'”- °1 /.J � ._€ P .I 51 if -.i . 'RAP" / •I-_ TC 1 f �w r--.-� ,-�,�--L/�._ t - I7/-- / ! I' r --_• -%" a ' �L#/ice ,� '5- � �. PI �tw� �° J 1 - \ y —_ -,,=,,,e..,,, Y s 11, — � w IIIILMOISOlImO u PIffi.YMNRYOW d FHI�'EPLAN fAYOClMi • 18122 FOR LEGEND SEE& TWF1 147 Lir..ww.iwv .w L N __ �SHEET WVFDR CRONFECTIq TARE L�L'% i! •r . B & C- 21 r -y 5 f ro� ,� h' ) I / (^v ` I 4.--- "'ice �wc8r .��rl"`� „Lc'�+4h r 1 11r r a'k_r ,;. r/j,,.1141-1,i)I / J J r / Jam.•-� am._ t-�' - ! ',-,'6,---,/ 1 _v I 1./ f �' P Y l s 191 /� -4f,„----„_,---14,__,,,--,-- v,---Si'i ..... '�..�'_& ``2,'F't` : t .�`v k f�), C A J� -ikh . ...._ 1. '';`, 1 1, ,T"4 r-s-F fI \, r �t <s`.T ),, ” j/wu.a,*}nu rva.' h °E 'y°"4:...`"" % J r7 - ^i'r",...n�5. c;4,..1 ,1,4 uL L ! ?t,,�.▪r,. �nr� l s ,-.t 3 �:��, f'4).-"" - 1 vaxci s` l -1 i snI-!''—. , II 1 ' +_^ ' ' - 'r• .ply* --``� r`/ } c_� 7{��I_1 1 cw:iti jt � y "1 ,.II T� ,`fi 7"= t 1,,(i/ ')`:6 r-^`, ‘-i...)�_ 1.1,1".: l f -h,-` u-..- -1 h I '; I. t4r4Y I �▪ 1 I 7- • { �`'f 1 R7477- �4 1∎ , i II�W1 • __ I r k-• C * CYtEI2 lr � + J V { r 'I I f[s/,,,^ ;_ 1 13— t 1 -.. /k )•..--i•— Sy .__{..-s .--�i - � I ',: tilti...y �.tJ* ii;)—f-- 1,..,......_22_2.7-____J-L ,,, "r. � CL (1. 111111 i W—s-- r—!I s i - - t 4jiJ I -'e �. k . ,.� 1,_.._I1 II F , l- __• �'I g pt.?)� .,-xxr.- ! ;4 I4,:. p ( .�'j�l// g ,/,,,, 'ikt'y 1 ' c £�r F y1 l�\ r\I /1 < . -�'('--=_,_. - 444, II f `?_,_.u,--- °"t� .j n _ A. ; I y \ -- ' I{ :1 f IF / 1[I �E1 `a ti. • $, � z 1l..v''"�\�t\i°r /. /- �r' >�"11/- 1 - I I'J ,i -_JJ._ .Lr ... .. tN ,.2—} 11f▪i —_r---'---' -4—. its �� ,wyw. �,u ..t, �._ y 1 t > \�'-_�,I 1 (v.� ' ' JI Ir \\--..■ lam? #1 r-te r f r_ _ �lgi akes�' �® --.- - �' s\ � f� aye - "" -....�.� "—bill .'. 11 1 4 4! I..:i �41 - .c . v,-. t_, x'..,'-— _� ,� - % = iii\ _ ..__=ur_�. r-- --------- -.. Pat cr to IRYLAG/ __ t Y— PLAN N LSmm . 18122 2 FORLsagc EE n EI ...�wri 8EE SHEETIN3 FOR CR0388�7/QIIB TAI.B , HAS "�'��.- �'� B & C- 22 CI)�� ` bl' 1 . lt J 1 z� ,'r 4.—i A lv,'ft / /c--., •i 1} �v-_ yrk ,•_____Tr_____r......,.. ...........,„ __‘,... . .1,...„ . _, ,..___:___J_Thr.„,_ .,�. V �i r 710-F Il°`.._ �. :11 j 1 h. } it 49 {il C— .�A rs `-- L l 1 ! .f •W. .�1 , l I4) ,' ti N._ ' -y' °r7 " r ,✓"' �h It t, -1 )� H4 (�- 1 Lum.r v fS P' FU-.' ,I h.�" nl ■111,FJ V� 1 na a az vr-'r h+: 1..r., .) I.x� /_ i 'u.)_. �t t, Li:My" ?)) i' f1 1 ,v' �r -�' "'C 1 L-- o(L�yx. +} 'f iA Y} 11'\' rr—�I I '�Ir--�,/ ill Jr 'S 5/'E� � ✓rY�2/�"4, IYI Val rl . w ,plr r 5 L ,;a 1 r (ts n I1 � z r§441 ? �,�:—I 4y.-.4.\4,-rho �.� '%J f c)�}�-r D -'_, �.J �.I-,,,,,,L; r r q J' ..�.,...._..Ar, ' j --- �--, f '4^"4 g.L�"___ /1.` --r c[ `.J . c, ( arr 1 a= i -,..„ . _- i /IJ 210FR�lYAY �FARA6iI Y8R 110J ' p6 v w plAlDllIR7EMN2 PRSAIINARY WALL&19310E PLAN asamma INSINIS so pa . FOR LEGEND Sffsf�T wfl I a-- ...., SEE MEET WM FOR CFOSSECI7ONSIDETNC8 e ms, r 3 '.. r 4 r i S } V ! 7 • I ` m I -4- .■ itNi a� .-•-te r- F Ma ma ismassr aramqL `� a op �: I 1.. o-,.. .. samazar- . nil% .. a 1111111 : Sa - = amass smarnsit iimie.-..- .."=-4.€ 0-�`-,!'' I '- 41 .. hriI?I art 1 I_ . WINS • — - C— - ,_,. W�� - I_nl_:m__mnE.1u_1 �a a _._ mnYm.w -- -.._ - 1 T��^i x ra — ...,.. m .--_..m - - lr news no _.--_ wrtaw ... revn..nuu. ppp��p�/ y�y LDT 1B PlisZ liAR au.A /YT -f. 00111•1111111 4, 18122 MIR WO E-::fir = : .�.._�._ — ..' B & C- 24 • .),,p i _ 1 J I` i 4\\I - x i k I ? , , +r(-del} j".i. 1. - A� �-�11 I I I 3 ) 1. 11 5 r I r -T1I 1 s ,'' II �\ I; . gi ' ri1 t. � - .Lifb El! V ,' • i ..' A ;_ sh _ ? ))) 1 --' ± e,�...�-� am:0� , . q � 1141•s C % g 1 Iiil11 z " ,I I t � � .� agay '1 NI .� i i. f: IF Jr yy! 1�� a s t, m I 4 !I ,,,t,17_11,1 ?_, ff j __ l It '. t : 1i I 1. I��_i•: �3. ,. 52 -ad i • y}'Sp i t `•p , ? I I 1 g N 17 11 I� 1 �1tY1 °�a ' ®N4._,e \ 1/ °q:e 1�g .� N �Ii?f Z�( 11 11 1p II4 1 i _ I qwe . Al, 1 �� L��6 ti 4-%., �'�S� � �,- I IIM I �y(2 : M /IM I II 1 1 ` ` 1 1' 1 ,y I'1 '. (a ai 5 .� l ° il I - ry • �' 4 .1.1,...:1 i:� �"4 �I I ` 11, _Iy \ 1 \�I 7 -1 t °1I ' `it, I `" '1 to \ `ll J pk "$ $ 1 1 �' � 1 „ l_ - s�IIF � l ` � `lt� j, X11 _ e f 51 , s is ry 1 h % �r �b � at I .I1• 1 p1!JI 1 c. e G o N l d 91 1 q� °�0 r, l 11B 1II . �i I 9rYI "1 l�,I 1.1 rl ' LI 1 14 : � 1- ' af'�1 i l ti §a d I :, � I ; �P" \ \ 11 .`� l j 1 .I \ \ g a O 1. t I I I�n I=,•� L i X11 r ° l 1 II ; ., �_ ▪ '� is : 111\4.r-3. 1 -� I I It: .o.PIP 1.\2'i- ._1 '.. \ I 11 11 51 l q a '11 11'1,44 l 7" II 'il ] : \I [.7 11 #t^w' I t i 1 \ \ . I u I �i;.r KI� ` • TIf 1 Ili .. m `,. 1, �- 1 fff � I(I V{ , v34Dr Y+ S ., 111 r��iIP; `.i,l ,-,'7i E ��` � ,IY f� n 1f �1i11 ��IE -;�� Li., t Ir +r 1-'1 e'�a' —,iif,�„ ,-.sue+ , s ^ ..- 1 v?'r II a 6• � , ?C© 111 ..IA.Rr' ' � �'Ir � 9S Ai.:''4 t 11 rl a. r ri'd +7 1 1, "d rr j II-I 1'. - - 1 1. . .. ' n I° I g @ A �.� __�, 1—'•� r'C'r �� Ot.�1 ' Ill 7 i .4 `I I iQ�,�l s ,.0 1 y' I1�1,1 1u �`\I © ` 1 II 11 r,„, I 1 t D-tali' 6 k Ak I Al�i 11' II / - i 1 Iv V Qli 1. >NsI1 1 1 \�� 4,1 11f` ,li & EXHIBIT G i B & C- 25 arT • y F -, 1 ` I . � '' b ____i__ \\\ 2 rte "�� mac. !1 1-�_ v Li. I ry 1 3 fSIk 1 ) } r-..' V 1 ,1. X15 f.4 / i, l f 1,1il ez— ( 1 ° I C�}�fjf�\� G I4'l\ G , Ji! JJ stir � j\l ;� I j: , r '4, I -a. ;Mt", 1' l r, C I1 I J I I co _ a a- n E t 'a:i.�il ITV k! I' r (' I i -- t .I� `. ,NI1 \ j,`i` C,I 1 1- !^1 '. 1 I pt>1 lF �f; ' }'A,I�1�l l '.{y ffi '� I:ti II ,, ( � he,: PO/' �- K� Zn _llI �II, W 7 *4?'.i � ) I)I I��It. �`' I I t�'c- {,I �// -� c a, 11`- it �, I4 k R �21'' 1 , i e ��s v ■I 1;P I1:i' i'� ._ .. X710 ® '--.•• t �� aI s 1\1 '"1 — - __7 ,__: rZ '/� ti �i ,j` I;� � . , 4 1 �j1 (II� , KY• � • I q t p" h , �Q Sin ,Ij 5 1� �I; , 7,, .Ii _i , ' � , ill, P/ II �1 l+L.. 3 I J 11 L r} l ( ft „, 1 6 1 �'tlj11 , j L.__t L 4L ns:ll �F 1 j lv' �_11� 1 II ., i i a 1 J t r , ' � }y : v � zl�� / '� I i� 1 l ?•\.:S:::;•'-'n ' v 1 j, S 9 ii I `{ 2 3 �}St 5( 1S gg .gw a q - it} '. i'I R� 1\, 1,`'1 tsfll ti, I ..-- S r� , I y. 1 ?12{ A 41 ��'I∎ p. t �•��II _� Iv- It), I� I'1 .i r F 1 ," Ste,; 1!" h9 (� ,IF �i �I` !8• ` I p ' ) , FC 1 1. °1.4 I i 1 '•--� 11 111 ' 1 — li ,. . <' i r Iti '. ill� I�1t', ;,' 1 pS I, , G* , , - 1�4 III r�'' lilY �1 A t. It t1 A- �'. (,,14 ki -�1 ' 5 ,•1 I( Iii �� " j I . l � MITI It!! iI ?l11I I ;yFsilI�I A) '. , .. { \'h , t - L-I 1 Its 1 .'J� y '�lyp�� I �' ' , '1'l 1,1:) ..). 1 - F =mitt; '�' Ion —I1- i- i I i �NNNN t+ i 1 `ll i 1 III L X11 . }I r", 1% i '.4ti, ` Swc +.' I 1- !' sw �u -i� j 77I i 1 I �„ .s _j - p �'1 Iir]]4c^ mGt�'yaflr® - 11-Z I I i II 99 II at�p {{II 1�g6p& �1 pc ,A �L.- • 3'i¢ -ell >e••., I �'ir4/8' nil)j!'COsLI -. el E, i`�' ,r _.-t f�l'lI 41.1 II ' Ij`I • L B & C- 26 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith December 15, 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC. - A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District located at the east side of East Avenue, north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793 and Variance DRC2009-00020. Site Characteristics: The project area consists of combining five (5) parcels that result in a rectangular-shaped property, with a combined area of about 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 2,500 feet (east to west) by about 940 feet (north to south). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, is vacant property where a subdivision for residential lots (Tract 17651) was recently approved. To the west, are additional single-family residences. To the south, is a vacant parcel owned by Caltrans and used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this parcel, is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east, are vacant parcels. • The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are about 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. A segment of an east to west Community Trail terminates (temporarily) at the southeast corner of a completed residential subdivision (Tract 16116) that is located across the street from the project site (shown as a blue line on the attached exhibit). There are no trails (Local or Community) that link the project site to the existing trails. The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development; the applicant does not intend to construct the homes at this time. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet, which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required. The depth of each lot will be at least 200 feet, and the width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension. All lots will be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting. Included in the proposal are several streets, including one that will link East Avenue and an adjacent future residential development at Tract 17651 to the north and the vacant parcel to the east. As the subject property is located within the Equestrian Overlay, each lot will require a dedicated corral area of 24 feet by 24 feet for horse-keeping, and equestrian trails will be provided along the rear of each lot per Section 5.25.500 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Along the north perimeter of the project site, a 20-foot wide Community Trail will be constructed per Figure 5-18 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. From East Avenue to a point approximately 1,200 feet to the east at the north side of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70, and 71, the alignment of the trail will be located entirely within the proposed subdivision. From that point to • the northeast corner of the subject site, the alignment of the trail shifts northward and only 8 feet of the required 20 feet width of the trail, at the north side of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35, and 46, will be within the proposed subdivision; the other 12 feet will be on the neighboring property to the north (Tract 17651). The existing trees throughout the site will be removed as necessary, and new Eucalyptus trees will be EXHIBIT H B & C- 27 DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC. • December 15, 2009 , Page 2 planted with a spacing of 8 feet on center per Section 5.41.501 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The perimeter wall along the south perimeter of the proposed subdivision, at the south side of Lots 1-16, is proposed to be in excess of 6 feet in height for noise attenuation. The perimeter wall along East Avenue, at the west side of Lots 1 and 71-76, will also be in excess of 6 feet (as seen from within the tract) for the same purpose. This perimeter wall and associated landscaping will be constructed to be consistent with the design shown in Figure 5-28A. At the southwest corner of the site, Etiwanda Specific Plan Figures 5-10 and 5-12 specify that a Neighborhood Entry statement consisting of special tree planting is required; the applicant will improve this area accordingly. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. • 1. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 2. None. • • Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Nicholson Staff Planner: Mike Smith The Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted after concluding that the design/layout of the tract is standard for this zoning district and area. The Committee, with staff's • concurrence, stated that the house product would be reviewed later when the developer of the site submitted the plans; the opportunity for additional comments would occur at that time. There was some discussion regarding the high noise attenuating wall along the perimeter of the site. The Committee observed that this was standard for residential projects along the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). Staff pointed out that the design and construction of the wall would be per Caltrans standard. Mr. Munoz asked staff questions about the hiking and riding trails noting that the Trails Advisory Committee requested several revisions/recommendations. He wanted to know the status of the changes and if the applicant was going to do them. Staff stated that the majority of the changes could be accomplished easily, and that the applicant would do them. The applicant later reiterated that they would incorporate the requested changes. However, there were two recommendations regarding access by • private vehicles and the placement of the Eucalyptus windrow in the Community Trail that needed further discussion with the Engineering and Public Works Departments. The principal concern those B & C- 28 • • DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC. December 15, 2009 Page 3 departments have is long-term maintenance. Staff stated that the Planning Department will meet with those departments for their input and determine if the recommendations could be accommodated without being contrary to any applicable standards or policies. Staff stated that if these two recommendations could not be incorporated into the design, the applicant could employ alternate solutions that would address the issues raised by the Trails Advisory Committee. Staff indicated that the outcome of the meeting would be summarized in a future memorandum to the Trails Advisory Committee, and a discussion of the recommendations would be incorporated into the staff report that will be prepared for the Planning Commission public hearing. Also, the plans for the tentative tract map will be revised accordingly so that at the public hearing the Commission will have the 'final' draft for their review. • • • • • B & C- 29 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY ' COMMITTEE AGENDA • WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2009 @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION I. ROLL CALL: X Frances Howdyshell A Pam Stewart (Alternate) X Lou Munoz X Larry Henderson A Janet Ryerson A Kelly Matheny (Alternate) X Francisco Oaxaca X Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) X Don Yoder(Bicycle Member) A Tom Tisler(Bicycle Member Alternate)_ II. NEW BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC.: A proposal to subdivide four(4)vacant parcels • with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, located at the east side of East Avenue, north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210); APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Associate Planner; Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer Action: The Trails Advisory Committee recommended to the Planning Commission approval of this application subject to the following revisions to be verified by staff: 1. Preserve in-place, where feasible, existing trees that will be within the alignment of the new Community Trail. 2. If acceptable to the Engineering/Public Works Department Design, vehicles (horse trailers, hay deliveries, etc.), shall be able to navigate throughout the network without having to drive in reverse. Where a Local Feeder Trail ends at a Community Trail, vehicles shall be allowed access onto the Community Trail, and the vehicle gate step-through may be eliminated. 3. If acceptable to the Engineering/Public Works Department, acquire an access easement from the developer of Tract 17651 to allow equestrian vehicle access from the Community/Local Feeder Trails. 4. Enlarge the corner 'cut-offs' at the intersection of the north to south and the east to • west trails at Lots 15 and 16 so that they are 20 feet by 20 feet(instead of 10 feet by 10 feet). 5. Provide missing corner 'cut-off at the right angle turn of the trail, located at Lot 17. EXHIBIT I B & C- 30 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 -DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. December 9, 2009 Page 2 of 2 • 6. Drainage 'V ditches shall be no more than 6 inches deep and minimum of 5 feet wide. 7. Provide walls per City standard instead of PVC fencing throughout the trail network within the tract, except along the north side of the Community Trail. 8. Provide PVC fencing at the south side of Lot 76. 9. Increase the width of the trail entrance at Lots 17 and 76 to facilitate vehicle access. 10. Install the replacement Eucalyptus windrows in the Community Trail and make part of the Community Trail maintenance. Provide additional width as necessary. 11.Provide striping in the street at all horse crossings. 12. Reduce the length and eliminate interim turnarounds of the east to west trail segments behind Lots 1 and 16. 13. Provide trail signage for the Community Trail at all trail intersections per City standards. B. CONSIDERATION OF NAMING OF A PORTION OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL • THE "RON IVES TRAIL" Requested by Don Yoder Action: Forward to the Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission, then to City Council. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - None • IV. OLD BUSINESS - None V. ADJOURNMENT - 6:50 PM • B & C- 31 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET • December 9, 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. - A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, located at the east side of East Avenue, north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793 and Variance DRC2009 00020. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The project site consists of five(5)parcels that,when combined,form a rectangular property with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet(53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet(east to west)by approximately 940 feet (north to south). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site there is vacant property where a subdivision into residential lots (Tract 17651)was recently approved. To the west are additional single-family residences. To the south .is a vacant parcel that is •owned by Caltrans and used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this parcel is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east are vacant parcels: The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low(VL)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with a south-easterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. A segment of an east-west Community Trail terminates (temporarily) at the southeast corner of a completed residential subdivision(Tract 16116)located across the street from the project site(shown as a blue • line on the attached exhibit). There are no trails (Local or Community) that link the project site to existing trails. BACKGROUND: The applicant proposes to construct an east to west segment of the Community • Trail along the north perimeter of the project site. This segment will extend from the aforementioned, existing segment to a future segment to the east that will be constructed as part of • a residential subdivision that is currently under review(Tentative Tract 18708, shown as a dashed red-line on the attached exhibit). From East Avenue to a point approximately 1,200 feet east, the entire 20-foot width of the Community Trail will be on the subject property. From that point to the northeast corner of the subject site, the alignment of the Community Trail'shifts'northward, and only 8 feet of the required 20 feet width of the trail will be on the subject property,the other 12 feet will be on the neighboring property to the north(Tract 17651). The applicant also proposes a network of a 15-foot wide Local Feeder Trails that will run along the rear property lines of each proposed lot. The proposed trail will provide the future homeowners access to the City's trail network. ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision is located in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, within the Equestrian Overlay District, which requires the development of Local Feeder Trails(private equestrian easements). The average lot size for the proposed project is 25,230 square feet, which exceeds the Development Code's requirement of 20,000 square feet to keep horses. Horse corral areas with the minimum 24 feet by 24 feet dimensions have been provided and are shown on the Site Plan. Each corral is located a minimum of 70 feet from the potential location of houses that could be constructed on adjacent properties as required by the Development Code. • The Community and Local Feeder Trails will comply with the minimum technical and construction standards. At every intersection of a trail with a street, and the intersection of a Local Trail and the Community Trail, a widened entry, a gate, and walk-through are proposed per the City standard to Item A B & C- 32 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. December 9, 2009 • Page 2 control access. The horse corral locations are immediately adjacent to the proposed trail that serves each lot." Along the side of, and parallel to,the trails will be a concrete swale for drainage purposes; these swales will not be within the trail itself and will be within a separate 5-foot wide easement. There are several trees and miscellaneous landscaping within or along the proposed alignment of the Community Trail. Staff believes the trees can remain in-place without interfering with the Equestrian activities and will help maintain a rural character consistent with the Equestrian theme. White PVC trail fencing will be provided. At locations where the trail has no outlet(i.e., a'dead-end' segment), turnarounds have been provided to facilitate reversing the direction(see Lots 1 and 16). At specific locations, the alignment of a trail has been modified to accommodate grade separations and/or potential conflicts with a street intersection (see Lots 1, 76, 16 and 17). RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the proposed trail layout and provide input and direction. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Attachments: A—Trails Exhibit B— Copy of Plans ACTION: The Trails Advisory Committee recommended to the Planning Commission approval of this application subject'to the following revisions to be verified by Staff: 1. Preserve in-place,where feasible, existing trees that will be within the alignment of the • new Community Trail. 2. If acceptable to the Engineering/Public Works Department Design, vehicles (horse trailers, hay deliveries, etc.,) shall be able to navigate throughout the network without having to drive in reverse. Where a Local Feeder Trail ends at a Community Trail, vehicles shall be allowed access onto the Community Trail, and the vehicle gate step-through may be eliminated. 3. If acceptable to the Engineering/Public Works Department,acquire an access easement from the developer of Tract 17651 to allow equestrian vehicle access from the Community/Local Feeder Trails. 4. Enlarge the corner `cut-offs' at the intersection of the north to south and the east to west trails at Lots 15 and 16 so that they are 20 feet by 20 feet (instead of 10 feet by 10 feet). 5. Provide missing corner `cut-off at the right angle turn of the trail, located at Lot 17. 6. Drainage 'V' ditches shall be no more than 6 inches deep and minimum of 5 feet wide. 7. Provide walls per City standard instead of PVC fencing throughout the trail network within the tract, except along the north side of the Community Trail. 8. Provide PVC fencing at the south side of Lot 76. • B & C- 33 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. • December 9, 2009 Page 2 9. Increase the width of the trail entrance at Lots 17 and 76 to facilitate vehicle access. 10. Install the replacement Eucalyptus windrows in the Community Trail and make part of the Community Trail maintenance provide additional width as necessary. 11. Provide striping in the street at all horse crossings. 12. Reduce the length and eliminate interim turnarounds of the east to west trail segments behind Lots 1 and.16. 13. Provide trail signage for the Community Trail at all trail intersections per City standards. • • B & C- 34 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY H, • COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION I. ROLL CALL: 6:08 PM A Frances Howdyshell x Janet Ryerson x Lou Munoz Kelly Matheny(Alternate) x Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) x Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) x Larry Henderson Don Yoder(Bicycle Member) x Bill Pallotto x ;Tom Tisler(Bicycle Member Alternate) II. NEW BUSINESS • A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING INC.: A proposal to subdivide four(4)vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, located at the east side of East Avenue, north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793 and Variance 2009-00020. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Action: The Committee generally accepted the project concept as revised. B. TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW DRC2010-00412 (FYR2011-2012) Staff Planner: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner(Oral Presentation) Action: The Committee continued the review to the next meeting. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - None IV. OLD BUSINESS - None • V. ADJOURNMENT—6:56 PM B & C- 35 •FC�,Gi0�n1f' 40,141 •6,;; ;;; DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING,INC. CffY OF RANCh{t3 CUCAMONGA December 1, 2009 • DEC 0 2 2009 Mr. Michael Smith City of Rancho Cucamonga RECEIVED - PLANNING Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • Subject TTM 18122— Community Outreach Meeting SUBTT18122, DRC 2006-00793 (DJC#147-001) Dear Mike, This letter represents questions which neighbors asked at our Community Outreach Meeting held on October 15, 2009 at the Foothill High School Library. Those in attendance were Mr. Mike Harrison from Chaffey Joint Union High School District, you representing the City,myself and six (6) neighbors from the surrounding area. • The following are questions taken from my notes with answers given to the neighbors at the Outreach meeting: 1. Q: How will the project be sewered? A: The project will contain on-lot septic and leach field systems. 2. Q: Will there be a wall at the south end of the project? • A: Yes. In order to meet the City's General Plan requirements for noise caused by the freeway. The applicant had an acoustical engineering report prepared which shows the need for a concrete block wall at the south boundary line to mitigate the freeway noise. 3. Q: Will East Avenue be widened? A: Yes. In order to meet the City's Secondary Highway Standard the • applicant shows East Avenue being widened on the east side of the right- of-way to 44 feet from centerline for a half-section. 4. Q: Are you going to leave the healthy trees on the north side? A: Yes. The Preliminary Tree Removal Plan submitted to the City as an auxiliary plan to the project, shows which trees will remain and which will be removed as referenced in an arborist's report prepared for the project. • lire 609•Lake.Forest,CA 92630• (949)586-5776•Fax:(949)583-5527•d1j@allnlobal.net EXHIBIT B & C- 36 • a p.n f'C Mr. Michael Smith " City of Rancho Cucamonga December 1, 2009 Page 2 of 3 • 5. Q: What is the intent to build a fence on the north boundary? A: As shown on the Preliminary Grading Plan, a concrete block wall is proposed near the north boundary on the south side of the 20-foot wide community trail. The existing fences (i.e. chain link) located on the north boundary line will not be removed by our project. 6. Q: Will the project be served by natural gas? A: We are not sure at this time. We believe the Gas Company will ultimately extend its nearest line to serve our project and proposed Tract 17651 to the northeast. If individual surrounding owners are interested in gas service instead of propane, they should contact the Gas Company at a time closer to construction of either Tract. 7. Q: Where is the nearest gas line? A: We are not sure. This information can be obtained from the Gas Company. 8. Q: Will the electric lines in East Avenue be undergrounded? A: . Probably. We have not yet contacted Edison regarding this issue. Contact with Edison will be made during preparation of • construction/engineering plans. 9. Q: Will there be parking on the east side of East Avenue once it is widened? A: No. Mike Smith reviewed the preliminary Conditions of Approval and noted a requirement of the developer to post "No Stopping" signs along East Avenue. 10. Q: Can the "A" Street centerline be lined up with the centerline of Chickasaw? A: The off-set in centerlines has been shown on the proposed plans through • three plan checks by the City and there has been no comment to align the centerlines. However, we will check with the engineering department at the City on this question. 11. Q: How will dust control be handled? • A: The Air Quality Management District requires that all grading projects in Southern California control dust through watering. If grading occurs before the construction of water lines, then watering tankers will be brought on-site to control dust. Mike, these are the questions I had in my notes from the Community Outreach. If you have additional questions from your notes, I'll be glad to update this letter. • • • B & C- 37 • • Mr. Michael Smith • far City of Rancho Cucamonga • December 1, 2009 Page 3 of 3 • As you know, none of the neighbors who attended the meeting seemed against the project and some were even wondering if they could "piggy-back" on the utility extensions of sewer, gas and electric for their own homes. Please let me know if you need any additional information from us regarding the Community Outreach Meeting. Sincerely, DAVID JEFFERS CONSULTING, INC. /�. !fit i David T. 4ers, AICP DTJ;Iy cc. Mr. Mike Harrison, Chaffey Joint Union High School District • • S B & C- 38 4,0, 1:4-4-• ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM • c et., - (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Division (909)477-2750 �. d-_=. " ? src" € -re. 'S;- to `-t 'i - 1- + : F =fit isT r,4t Car The purpose oflthisJorm is to informrtthe City ofahe,basic components ofnthe°proposed 6°protect so that the liNi y e ew the protect pursuant to City Policies;Ordinances;ands; ' Guidelines,I the�Ign'ornia Environmental, Qualityt Act,„wand thec biity's� Rules lantl,p: -iProcedures` torlmplement CEQA Its s;importantithat,the,informationIrequested Injhis 1•,, n a ,t r, l P x mf a xo-r 'I + v '`7 S-3 s. F n- r k }P .aisl g- '�rc�p i�°. 14.14hcationlbe provide_,111,d full tic ' } t- , � �w � t °i..-. ��ax+: ..a?.'.,r fi^ ..tus ';7 `- .. na ....,,?-.r .1,..,._.`'z.,� .,.�.. ::�...��S.c".r`Xi,S,'x�t�..,.....:�'",�-c .�` *+9 ' GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pert.Y” HM%18122 DRG2006-:00793-.::,= ,:,� ..__ _.-_..m - .�'�.,m,..1*. 'fix :.x at&� 2.�`+re'' t ... Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 18122 Name &Address of project owner(s): Chaffey Joint Union High School District 211 West Fifth Street, Ontario, CA 91762 Name &Address of developer or project sponsor: Chaffey Joint Union High School District, 211 West Fifth Street, Ontario, CA 91762 (Contact: Mike Harrison) 909-988-8511 Contact Person &Address: Engineer/Representative David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. (Contact: Dave Jeffers)949-586-5778 19 Spectrum Pointe Dr., Ste 609 Lake Forest, CA 92630 Name &Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. and with Luke Evans, Assistant Project Manager Michael Brandman Associates •621 East Carnegie Drive, San Bernardino, CA 92408 Telephone Number: 909-884-2255 MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 1 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM EXHIBIT K B & C- 39 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(*)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. • *1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): The project is located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and the 210 freeway. SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 28, Township 1N, Range 6W, on the USGS Cucamonga Peak 7.5 minute quadrangle. See Exhibit 1, Regional Location Map, Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity USGS Map, and Exhibit 3, Local Vicinity Aerial Map. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0225-191-03, 0225-191-04, 0225-191-13, 0225-191-15, 0225-191-20 *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 52.3 acres *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets &proposed • dedications): 52.3 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): Project site is currently zoned for Very Low Density Residential (up to 2 du/acre)within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed project would not require any alteration to this designation. 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: 1)Tree Removal Permit, 2) Rough Grading Permit, 3) Precise Grading Permit, 4)Wall Permit, and 5) Building Permit 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The project site is currently vacant land. The western two-thirds of the site (approximately 45 acres) is • composed of abandoned agricultural properties and ruderal vegetation that is regularly disked for weed abatement. A few rows of mature eucalyptus trees run through the site, as does a grid of unimproved dirt tracks (see Exhibit 3, Local Vicinity Aerial Map, and Exhibit 4, Site Photographs). The eastern portion of the site (approximately nine acres) is composed of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS) in TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 2 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C-40 • moderately undisturbed condit u . • • The site is relatively flat. There are no trails, dedicated roads, scenic aspects, or structures on the property. Approximately 0.05 acres of USACE and CDFG jurisdictional areas occur in the east-central portion of the site. The applicant's geologist, Leighton and Associates, has determined that the site is suitable for development. The site does not lie within an Earthquake Fault Zone. The depth to groundwater beneath the site is approximately 200 to 300 feet below surface. Soils consist of unconsolidated deposits of coarse-grained sand to bouldery alluvium. A Habitat Assessment and focused surveys for San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) and Coastal California Gnatcatcher(CAGN)was performed. Neither species was encountered on site. Plummer's Mariposa lily, a California Native Plant Society List 1B species was observed. Approximately nine acres of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) is located on the eastern portion of the project site. Proposed offsite mitigation is recommended for both the Plummer's Mariposa lily and the RAFSS habitat. Project reports and studies performed include: 1) Habitat Assessment perfomed by MBA (07/2005), 2) CAGN and SBKR focused surveys performed by MBA (09/04/2005 and 10/21/2005), 3) Delineation of Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands performed by MBA (08/03/2006), 4) Phase I Cultural Resources • Assessment performed by MBA (02/07/2007), 5) Geotechnical Study performed by Leighton and Associates (04/26/2006), 6) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by Winzler & Kelly (04/14/2006), and 7) Noise Constraints Analysis performed by Mestre Greve Associates (February, 2007). and 8) Tree Survey and Arborist Report performed by MBA (05/15/2007). All of the above-referenced reports are included with this application. • • • • • 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): The project site has historically been used for agricultural purposes. A Cultural Resources Assessment was prepared for the site by Michael Brandman Associates, and is included with this submittal. This assessment has determined that impacts to prehistoric cultural resources is unlikely. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: • • TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 3 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM 8 & C-41 State Route 210 runs adjacent to the southern boundary of the project site. A 20-foot high earthen berm separates the site from the freeway on the western half of the site, as illustrated in Exhibit 4, Site Photographs. This berm attenuates traffic noise coming from the freeway. The eastern portion of the site, however, contains no berm, and the freeway is level with the project property. • A Noise Constraint Analysis was performed by Mestre Greve Associates and is included with this submittal. The study found that noise from the freeway and from East Avenue could be mitigated to meet City standards with the installation of noise barriers and/or residential construction building upgrades. The construction of noise barriers and the extent of building upgrades would be specified and incorporated into the project's plans prior to the issuance of building permits. With the inclusion of these mitgation measures, impacts to the project from offsite noise would be reduced to less than significant. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. .Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: The proposed development is being processed under the VL Zone in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and Design Guidelines. The project would create 85 residential lots on approximately 54 acres. See Exhibit 5, Conceptual Land Use Plan, for an overview of the project. Minimum lot size would be 20,000 sf, and maximum lot size would be 37,751sf, with an average lot size of 22,891 sf. The site is covered by an equestrian overlay, and would provide rear yard equestrian access and linkages to the Community Trail System. The project would front on East Avenue, with primary access via Street"A." An additional access point would be via Street"F"which would tie in with TTM 17651 immediately north of the project site. A preliminary development phasing plan has been prepared and is included with this application. The entitlement process is expected to begin with the submittal of this application package in May 2007. As the owner and "developer" is Chaffey Joint Union High School District the project is requried to be sold to a developer or homebuilder entity after tentative map approval. The time line and schedule for this action cannot be determined at this time. • • • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or • scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use(one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Four parcels to the immediate north vary in size from two to five acres with one residence per property: • Also north of the site lies TTM 17651, currently vacant land and recently approved for development of 56 • Very Low Residential lots of 20,000 sf minimum. East of the property is vacant land and beyond that is the Etiwanda Flood Control Channel. The southern boundary of the site is flanked by a one-lane access road, a concrete-lined drainage channel, and SR-210 freeway. The western boundary of the site is TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 4 of 5 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C- 42 defined by East Avenue, with V_., Low Residential lots on the west side of ti io street similar to that described above. • 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The proposed project will convert approximately 54 acres of vacant land into 85 equestrian-oriented residential lots with private feeder and community trails. The new development would be consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and would also be consistent with existing and recently approved development in the area. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Short term noise would be anticipated from residential construction activities primarily related to grading and construction of underground utilities/storm drain facilities and would be temporary in nature. Long term noise would be most pronounced from SR-210 to the south. Earthern berms, sound walls, and other mitigation measures as noted in the Noise Constraint Analysis would reduce onsite noise levels to below City standards. The sound attenuation report, prepared by Mestre Greve Associates dated March 22, 2007 is included with submittal of this application. • • *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: The Tree Survey and Arborist Report completed for the project by MBA (included with this submittal) found that of the 292 trees currently onsite, only 59 appear to be salvageable by pruning or regular maintenance. An additional 60 trees are in marginal condition and could possibly be saved with maintenance. The remaining 130 trees are in poor health due to damage by fire, age, or neglect, and should be removed since they are potentially hazardous. Two of the existing windrows could possibly remain in place with the proposed development, and the single valley oak could also be preserved. The remaining trees would require removal as part of the project's development. The arborist recommended that, as per City and State regulations, all removed Heritage Trees be replaced at a 1:1 ratio with minimum-sized 15-gallon trees. Specifically, the report recommended that the northernmost windrow be extended eastwards and that additional trees be planted throughout the development as per the City's direction. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: The site is located in Area 5 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy tabled to existing Master • Plan System 5 drainage facilities and the Victoria Basin Secondary Facility via offsite drainage improvements to be constructed from the proposed development to the existing drainage channel on north side of the SR-210 freeway between East Avenue and the new Etiwanda Channel. TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 5 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C-43 • 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 600.00 Peak use (gal/Day) 1,200.00 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 0.00 Peak use(gal/min/ac) 0.00 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank ® Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 270.00 b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) 0.00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 85 • Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Minimum lot size is 20,000 sf, maximum lot size is 37,751 sf. Average lot size is 22,891 sf. Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): • . 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $0.00 Rent(per month) $ to $ • 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Anticipated number of bedrooms is three to five. Architecture has not yet been prepared pending approval of development entitlements. • 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: • Anticipated sizing to be 2,500 sf single-story floor plan and two or more story floor plans with sizes up to 3,500 sf. Precise architecture has not yet been prepared pending approval of development entitlements. TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 6 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C- 44 TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 7 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C- 45 24) Indicate the expected number of school children'who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: 33 • b. Junior High: 20 c. Senior High 21 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: • 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: • Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818) 572-6283): • TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 8 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C- 46 ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. • Water: Cucamonga Valley Water District • Sewer: Cucamonga Valley Water District Gas: Southern California Gas Company Electric: Southern California Edison Company Telephone: Verizon Communications Each purveyor has indicated by verbal confirmations that they can provide service. We are currently . in communication with each purveyor to obtain written confimation. When received, that written response will be provided to the City. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides;fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was conducted on the project site by Winzler and Kelly and is • included with this submittal. The assessment concluded that the site presents evidence of low environmental risk. The western two-thirds of the site were used historically as an orchard operation. A review of historic aerial photographs indicates that the orchard use was discontinued prior to 1977. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment recommended the following actions: 1) It is recommended that a geophysical survey be conducted to determine where, if any, undocumented/non-permitted UST's, underground pipelines, utilities, or other structures could be buried on the site, and 2) Prior to the • commencement of development on the site, the first six to 12 inches of top soil should be tested and analyzed for commonly used pesticides and herbicides to determine if any further actions are necessary. • 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. Storage or use of hazardous and/or toxic materials are those limited to normal use within the home after this project is completed. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct • tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 9 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C-47 Date: • 5 .07 Signature: 0° % V ` ;(,0 Title: PgFs. • • • TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 10 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C- 48 ATTACHMENT A •Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial 3,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2,500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3,000 gal/day/ac • Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows • Residential Single Family 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gal/day Commercial/Industrial • General Commercial 2,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,000 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1,500 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3,000 gal/day/ac • Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 • • 0. TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 11 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C-49 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School • 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 .• TTM18122 East Avenue Environmental Info Form.MBA.comp.rev.3.23.07Page 12 of 12 Created on 3/23/2007 11:39:00 AM B & C- 50 ri Wtt;;:l.■f..6i)1\\\:77i-4t":<'r- ';)S3N---' ---),S.-)1/1,,WiLfal'',,,, . .-. InV1/4 ncribilti A --. ' 71 /-...`I\-?A'/ )lc-• ;-'■P' ,01::.1,,),,,yr. vki,;(,,(1,\\,,,.-^ - ,,.■ , .„•„:".„„.„,,..14. Ai,* tx• r.N: 1 , .16,./$Mt-. '''-::: -ads. '/I 1 .-.211k,,---\ , - - • 4.4: ..1 ,..gctirtS_-= - ..44,M.44103-....4•1•45 Pt% !Mr 4.1.b t'' ‘i,t -yeraWatriv ' 1 \ I Art.' \ ,j,;:', ,o1-?--1/4-r---",{') ,`,,,RoAp.-"n"Mitttrrta .;.r,,,!,„'L'-' ,,....,0■;-='zvr40:41:1'e'..a..\\ . b I, _,"■':2---),;\)\.'Cr--i"- -- \ 4 ',ink\ Iii / ")‘iir,.. ,' 5.- 4---f.„.401.,,,....'S1.'441'0.-47,^44•44---41 „it? ,11 „HI , \ .,‘ it_ 6,trtitt.2,,,L, c,jx.\;*y,,,,,,__ _=_43,„r_ ) it , - ‘‘. - ckif,\-\ L-2-11 ._ -s.',0-\ ,■cfr-:;y7;0" _„76 ,-) 4 (_;-,`iii--__ir,, I i,\, y---1Ni ,7,:s.A,s__sii 1 ,\;.,>,; , licYcs,---H7-:- id, ,_,- `'''• i ' \''''»" ' \\-' jA .14 /A \-1-17' --' i _/' ' :-.=‘ -.,-).:;-)\■Q ) -';, i( ,\ -__„\ N _t\z/L-''.-- ; \,-„, ■ ,:--) P\ ------ 1 ' \r , _1,-_;, ••-;\•)?1( r•-04" ,•?;, )=-/ .--- - -II' \N■lt•-:-)■ i i\,,--u A,ii(irri ,21,..)))/ 1° -'' A rn I j ; ?c)1'.rjj\ii-"jiri .14-.*°i 1 ., _ _I _..., ] •1 ft!.....;_i 't N(>,If l',..;.(:,\A )14't1-•.;•-e, .7•:;:....-,,,, y), ,_/,Ti lc/ i'../71,1% _p_--II - f "..0\21.11j 114‘..4:-.) :2.1/4' „at- pi 1 ,--_, f"24 T 1' -7. - ' - I ' *'is'-'='='4,---1- ,1 f• yr i j,./, •/pc.'4 '.-74.-----Sg4g1:.4-1,-,Ca \ ) 13113Ic&3'14 1',._ 4-,5-1',-1 A iII_ r-----ic, -I-t 'I-'in 11/ `'''fr'' of #'cc: '.31 r ' , 'I'd-r'- ----- SP,m13-41;...„- .4-,^414dn'. •- .N f‘fr'.:-■•'al-'$-,---•',--"iT:-_-----.A., ,-,■ IN.,--, -ricity 1 i 1,Alli , \,iii 7 4), 0---r,. :•i. -aY-anY°'- r`.-..." •-- ,---',,,,,.,.-,:" I— r-'.,--.. c c'eAC 14::',/ I r 2.--P-.2-Y.•:' ---121••:',''' . r 1-- ' Ssak19n -) ''s! ) — :-177--"---- - '' ---','Ti j , ::^Ilk\)‘.`,:'‘, /1 11 •/'•!..1\11'1'1\1 U,Y-Tck‘,/ r-__-!`-`-,1±--1' i !!! --!! i '”, - - ,‘,, ) / ,- ____ ; -.) .- ,, , _.... im\-./ ,l... -111).-4)\--5----* -- : / ) , - , ' )%--- ,-;--Ri ) --, j- v-, -• ) c -- - ) ' '',' '' ' ‘' \ • -‘‘) - ' .)1 - 7 "-•:/.426--j.11 -• 71 •11- ?t, .1.1. • ' /7, ---'7- - - _ - • . . ., , .4„..cr-_-;-.• :-' ,:raw* 0.•_ _ , , ,0 •• . ./ ' (-- I ,/ I.1-1 1 E'1 --"s- „ s' _ s ! )-2 S /0 '-'--oci .& ‘, .., 71" -xi •111 -?, .--=----1- - ....... 1 " • - it _ . _ __ _ . „ 1 - , i ----7----' • r7 /F. F18M2122 7 / + 7 r , . ,- >• I la ; -- ... , ) , •. ,,,,,,0 L'.'.•1 . -, ,. ..-- - . . ... ,i , - -- „.... i 1 --- • 1 1 !\! " ;/ .7 . i - , , __ .. _ __ _. ..... : 7, , , %. i _.-- . . , , . 7 , J , . ; , ... ..- ,s f- ,., -- - - - 1:: : -:1•:.-.,.. .. 12 i 1 i - - ..-- 2.4 {—J-.) .._ ---- , /7 • • . --- -' ---\( •••••'\ -'7 ,- _ -- /\ \ ' . I , ,_ .-- \ „ ,..„-- , , ,,.. .. - -,,-- , ill „._,..1r _„-- .7 i 1 '.:ti .,./ . ,,,,\\ r;a,„„0'()° -1000-- „ , ..., ,., „, ,. ,----C \ • .. __- - 1 \ ..___________ --->0 \ .7 PROJECT E , 2 __---_ • _....,-r_I ...(7.— ,\ --- , ,., ,i,.___,\__ , : _, - ..._ .., - ) a _„—siTlsoci! ----- . ..--"' k J f c i. . . ,„„,.„-- -„ ,--- . „Jr if1 /L \ 1 - a .,„...- _---' .. ,,,...--- .., \ i-t: -, ______ ..,..„.t.,_ -.1 -- „- ...-----'- \1 v- . ,- )'----- ---- tik,,,„ li; 't \- -2--:N[,t' . \ /'WOO-- ------------ • ___ . Autumn Avenue '--- i_)2.c,_ 1 1 tS ..„.,_. , • ---- - , .....--- —- 4 • ' School ...21i „ - - 27 I 11 34 k4-1t1. 1 ' 29 • 15 .= 28 150 !"_! --- I -} ) -.1",--f---- . r--- r ' „- ---— r • - / --- „ - ., [ -1 — -- , •. ____-- - ., 1 ca • ,-- ■1 ,_, c _- 2- ■ cc -kit:7;f: I r--- 333 1 43 • -.1:1'if/ '4V • / .11 -- ia) Po : 1 1 . _...... ( A I 0 _ 1 --- 7498 C.-) I--AVENUE . ¢i — — - - -- / I — —. 7'. bwl —.... -- N. . ---.. ; I 1 • .1- i i Station `''ll s't 7F.''...;:;.::. '2?.17.,;.,..7',. I • . . • C) II I I .i.:::-Ii 40, ri 27:3, ,1 \r- -f-iii ' -''3' -' . E1.:11:, - • . • •• 6 II 1 1 , 44-7,-4. . ?7- .-.4.4 14. 4-4 •••1 -/11 --. __----------' •‘•*- •• ' 1 1 • :'. ':',Wird Si, I-- ti 1 - ir • .•= d it iwanda :;;34±'• l' '63- ■i 3 Fire. I: n'IL . t 77---' ' II Station . J: .1:174 . ii - 3lifi ----J .1 -- •= 33 - --0 • - - -- ' --- - - • • w i MU, ? --- ' ----7,. • • _1:! -. :.:... . 1 34 . _., _.-- — 1- ...• . . " .„ " • ii. • - • • ii • --... '- • - • ik \\ .,===: - _/'-- --- • Etiwanda k • 0/ ? 1:1 • ,- • IN 449 33'30 I 451 I 452000m E INTERIOR GEOLOGItAL SURVEY.RESTON IRGINIA 1999 1 1 B & C- 51 , HIGHWAYS AND ROADS —_, 5t .F,t? .x.rk,,. -v re....JVFNrix� fir, r ,,;,a94 c1,4-U.rtx* ,�'F`nr zl +A're . r.�9yy1"t4 s r� >:,�i �"1 �2'y/• v'r" ti r"y'.r cu ircar ' u' "1 f-',.. IY; s ll' f ,,t�� J tr rI I ,r 17k�iy r.841` .vC L'It'k`'xr„r afl :W' ^ "l `f� }'lsa' t. F'Yr�i"x�z'; s'n s �' z � ? �.�,rt r i x...a Ier.Vaile� ;li xctS xtuAkta, � �'V'eiylzr € rwRa`ey?,4r, �Pt� s „� a 7,A i G,� yr / t 't P 5tk' f. 2`kr+J i�'? ,, y} .• ,, r�r�yr < „, i•1 rx>u ,-f. 'SJ-,-,w 4+��'",,s+ E7a i'.0-----44--7 Y • R"r rhta Ss ` )j. ; ;-� :,,t. tz'x" 4 t.It r., }.:€.7;4;;L;;;.' '* . 1- y l' r ' � n(r ei f r e+, S ,T'ry 1'?:„+"r�' ; r N raV•a't r'rs / ,�`" Mea enax^ c >k III ry 7 ct �y 1. r/i,�y'r7>%,,r .,�, A47-14k+ q s `\'7r. f�.Y 11 Id r� 5`� i�). vY �.a•0g t t+.a >!l' rr aYr f J ` l Project Site a l/' � } ' {1 yad' � l �t� , trr Y%,� ji�;. r 4Y II % 4 t //�®fir / /� / ,r �y •fQ '� , j+.rr a,1' .:,...,-K- "r. ! of �� / �r(/l•%r'k_, r+f _Ira7rf f` r� Y r eli:mK�' i .A' • Ij"r w r�i�/-.'E i :i ��,,,� f2 tr Sillaf7'r r �' be•-9, — .„*;44.-'.-40-''" JI b`h 'f ._M i t i `. t,r 4-5"4!:. ..v� r yea y<•„ t 1p� 'y ! <J X'�1Y$y ✓ �' Pdr at'y}'�'•-Il Y tA i-0�iM1JV r)v//'y(/`� �r 1 /s pliVa Y i�,+6i,1/ ,t l,� yr}�liu� r �SY rj NOT TO SCALE r Mks, stS' Y '�.'t�Y�,S (I rP xr�3•F� 1.. u.•yr °�yy' i 44,-,01 ,r --'- r ufi Sr :k �•- ..i✓ "ip1 ,i.-.t "t.:ry`r3af e ,rl t.7' - 15' 4:-,[•r .,,,, r 7 si t d,'t .I J�� r t � °7 ✓+t�✓'I � :') Protect Site t +r f;.4:1 e� ,,'I 7 ti a_ ,r� P fry : '✓ ft J I: t P r r?.t2-/..fit r t ,iF, 5$' Ur ({s�� A, rt r. �.+ v �'j "=iSa' r'��u'•�' shv+ly l�tRv * i' ' Y.a�s.\txs •art `nl,' r .lj z`—`7 -�` v .'i •!f ,3Y✓J ' ✓ fit, r ' _. xryc+ , -'r>t` A3” �� rr . r__,,. •,,•?,„„....:.,,, ,..,":5; r .C.=11-Pi • ....co-.; � g n r -rai a �4q�_....' d r• an: >A� '- ,4 \ +rt'p- r U .( .-.,,r r1 £ ty .�. y " 'P'e�t� e"rut. t 'r li r� 3i�0 4i' x :,Alt,' :t: In o .: s'' � .wlm jF 3 + .fir a t 1��pr a ._ i "ns . s .,UJ y• to ,, t'e7e 61� t art emarddno �{ k } ancto Cupp$ing`a y� , �t s 7. ,y 71a..,;v 4476,45“-- ��}'I, rt i 6,114V;',4.71.4.1.O FOntena t�1'f4} " �/f' ' + 41,,,, '' ® • f+ • Ifi t / 1 y�di2p f k}*� F, 1 3� ,il�'IC �ry+t�� 4 . il/ �'.•''.. , e r-• ((PP''� �. .aw.' OnSYtan "Ar °'"�'�'x' ;.1, ..-s)vor>r ;r1V- �"'>r .J al .':f z .> ,. '9,. ,n iPomo v. ,.g"w Syr.i€ a+�"�"°" 'a`.4. 'C+=. 7�n r�, ., ,4?� "•rrmm r,> `R`i flWl J Y� .. K-,r k r Ri r m v y W i w-F� 4 e gs t� � r 11 ai Y P ��% y,1:' � . # live -.. .rx i i 7t-.L *; itc ..r :n a' ri r� is, . ,., <��•5 ..4' e ..errt5"a+ .fir a *11 7r.ri i t :: 6,--i �a i n ry J A X �. m u c sr ¢ Mq lT nl.;,Y�f +—'-'°'i i k h fly ..,,,sr i 1 r4 Jam; �'' u-"a �7 ]`J r 1 �i I•C,Lran� py , IM: e4C4 ':'1,..t 7 4 ,• L •1' . L' 'Is ^1 1.4; 'Y f r> 1 �� a `six la 1 f M�7. _ -/ d ,4,',..r[ ° t er /1ti Pt J v - ` r t ' Ine Hlllna ',° .r yr ,11 �` 7r r'}yt"�d 4 $t.n' .i.\ 'f"-+(I I ai�.y� �n w- }::. ,; ih ,.,F x h C' t-.fi t 3 =7171.-;ev'n t �� sr ,c4aar'e. r al' .K+ r f 4,1, '^«ter h °'t°'r1yr#;� yu� ,/1: >19 f�j�j r"7^^ r' Ida Y..stn ,s w 'r /216 r .-2V-:'.KA, Le". t r��,ge °��`Jf r..c 'i $ C .c a d ruF• ,,,, v/ , rr- +,✓„ r •-'rte 0 a4Y 4 i.r/ vr. h1Y n .C' 'v`+/.#-� >%r:1 s yr U xt+ - Y r/ .+•� '�n Moren00Val e yr t r .f'tag' r s, ref,std JaG .11p�1 aMy� ,�,y' rz Z.}'F� ,;„�il.J �dr ar'T r1 S a p - 7� °S. try J ys +mi t lrY i'✓Al� 6J � i �r '"v'" r I rf% a'�,. 1T tOa'r� y ii-try'* f#- ..JJ' of✓'n \ ..,Sa"5" +a'c+'rty 6•y/ r 4� Y r > 4V1 ; �I;1 /- r t C1 y ( ff, rH it/ fil\�aa %? C. .�} (,j/�y^ate!!/ .,�. /'. s 4 r ;,-1,444 T/,tw ?^ .erva to r Y,'a. , ryv },.d'�` rl�' r ++wrta� Y { la LIIIU� r)1 �� i if. ) + f u Y 4 I ttin ' t�%d.�"';G•v r i ,3 447: '+}. 4 &- .r .L1. ra i 4' i t J/d '' }`5f f 4� ^z�''' '. rt,G \°,A 'msI iF�.,� / � ° �, Ry , � t .La. �•- •., x , ..+ J ii 7rn�r �x r Y' '�. �t 1m' Jd t�✓r#✓11 ri t fr � :, „ \i P„ fotk a s! d �+/ 5 p 'ii-�, fi /y"t''1 ryr /gib \ i !� .�' rr?+r "! " �] zl.�(� Ir�� 1 t ,air. •," +1"s .47 a 1 r j1 9 r frifY rr 2' ' t r iji li N • ��` , b 7R : t' r° . y , llr r/1)�y;FY st a.' "f`1- ."ear's' a` N , :,,,,A.t�I.k 't ^ ✓ eke Mati; ..4 ,,55. `� .y :: \"'„pi,' ,±�Nji• n6 .er / Fx ,� �, r ) ,fir\ s11 .f j• , r ,.r: 4J r .gs rr rr 'a" e,"4'c' .t'�,'-�" s� . i rrl`r°fi,• �, 1P Y d >s z r W v ror r F 1 r•Sr .. / 3ti / Y6 F\ r ! , T" iil (lY't �•Iar r.,„c t, , Y firri ' `o■ p . '€y,. , 'p'i..n j:' P"r fSX"+ .e3 7, ,,6,'9 ° 1 )* r �", t, ✓ r, ;:np. e ra ' -',,�/'Y/ b r ice :=�•-.r-::;;" \� i-l' r i '?°.ri ,a+r`, r J .; JIi" i' j If • - 1800/I �� -/ j`t• ' / �✓' ' -I- j i , ell /f /,--- - / ` Q. 00 11 I / i I, i r- I .V i J sii7-6 z&-- ! mss'} _I \ ��wate II �/ / i. — ./ I ,.` /� Tank • 1520- _... it . 11�.�:\:.. iF�1 -- _.._ 1604 •. l • _ • _ � 1�i \ 1—fy � _� -_ / Ie "� I-�- Sch ,cL e � / ca _ _.I- s mu nnr Iim m� �b n ¢ 1_27 .i - ._ OS .ice / ' _ •N\ Gat --v-II= = Project Boundary -' ; " Sta •I -0,--.;" , _. `• �J IIj �I cyll ,, - 7:---___.. - - - - - • ,. e ,. z, ..t .. . ", O it , . . .,1,4.,4 ,,,, I iAiiro1 Station •••••�,. } ..g. it -_„�, /\te' i 14111 „1 If ▪ - --- C „ / I II = —• _. 34- 1 • ▪LcEtiwanda ( i:; /yJJ 'a ,moo • I UTHERN it PAC/F/ ,t2,� % \ 3—�`' E- J ^ 3 Etiwanda 7'' . ?, • ' • Source:USGS 2006 13NN 1,500 750 0 1,500 Exhibit 2 NEI z VIII•1111111.111 Feet Local Vicinity USGS Map Nfichael Brandman Associates 23060012•02/2007 I 2-USGS.mxd INITIAL STUDY, EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT B & C- 53 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA j `� n7 �r ,br":> 53 �w 4j �. 14't z"k y ,, §dM1 t'a I ° 4 t�5�rl ( CMr rw1; • r '!'? :. ' 1 xt nfi a d=x v ' c �+. F w o f-wp f y r r y 444),-,6:,,,;:-/ $/n� '"�i.. ' .. k titi'ak -e,,•. �.s ,.r'.a"i \ -4, S .�.'• si� £��`3' /j1§t. < -T?•-141 f 55,�� ' 1 'v d"h i F '.�M .y .�"A. ' �Sl Nf:. 11 v • ^. s. t 4 '�\ old yrl f .s1 1 . 7 kK I >t M1 Ci u'r l 1� l f wpb kr -' �; fa.-CJ , n a1 -ki f n T r!a Y r -r I. '3ri 'N W,A/ �+ 'n+. pi '`Fr3y• t �, e 3 .r;x v ,� S Ir j p S ,+. 9 it 1 '' A }rf f5 0 y„ 7}"s+ 3M �Pd:� si ,, 'it r 2: t nIt tT T a t f a,a , ; - J' a L i� ''' � � D l�Y i I ¢°lu t Rd {Y 4 ksA ' � .-' } i�F vY r � ,,A�,• 7�k �� ti Ho`t`s rM1”. l xJ .: r m1, Y. z. Y c yr ` ' Jy11 J^+ jf �. I ..I * l ",,,,ATC, 'r�'p fi isf s q 1 i,r : J j',,,4; Fy z�jy '1 3 tJil >"�rg v i` ar 4 iy Ta9 T 1: � lir . �w, .` _ •tCr T tlr".7F x Ztiv r ,, rt f a ) k ti- � r y; t t - e`, 9 is t A s f 1 r R r 1 tye wises v c ,. ry l r I +,e • o-t t { rs. v r. t 13 tfs�44--,in -a a cl '+. 'il 4 A.s, J u • 4s f t�. w� ai` r tl o �yfi ti+ o ♦ Ytr" ,y c.:1,4, � � .f1; i I �z rl } "4e Z a s �; A7 net ' ti \ : e 4,,„0,,,, ;.c a' a e Y4 r " + r F f I.n 1 i�'A i I ski V' A -V A. 1 u. J7 r - 1 a �, Y 7, ' ti' li' =rw,rir• -s�s ', c>o� .SK-. [-ti-s, LL r.y c >^ ,jw s A .i �r Ea^+l- �� , TGr' _ —1 c Y11y , } .src,,N, VE ,. ; �-.1 l 1 r �, r ,.. a '6p"yr F 4r i s �1��I n Wti '♦ W' ''>lY r .4 'S�sl I�:A '2-1.--, a '., - f -r S� s r'i1� ♦ " c f.,.., y ,... >. w ,>ri ' } r 1., r at ': , d fe F.I."� 3T"-L trfi .. r;' .@'+'b\ trJ y r C•r�- t tp g tit•'•4s4 t i � ,—;J,.-C..2 b i !.4 , r+ 'J ,..q ak n �', i. 1r . kt fex . .e . {rL T L k. a, ' .r. '3» � ;13 l` a'nr aF,,— SZ:"In r y 1 I ti''.,' i y +,J • i f .la -t.CC:"' f,-;;I: t =�I.W 5 LL i J..M'S S~lU3 _. �.0 'L , 1 � ' rt y , , r,', `Q+: `` W A �r p po T!r ik r u °h tti `7-h,t�, n+ ,.k,ti -n.r, w + Lc M1•n{� \ Tr yF .>r•a S 3 1 - ss sT• `x' sre+xe O a r r ^'i 4 \ .,t I k ` L Ls it . ,, y 1 u y i ,2 a `5 c+N 1 ,: �f :. .:,. T.k xL.+a 1;7;r `f?+'r"ryC�f 1 Project Boundary ,:A c J �r r +„y .4 4 ,. NI ,+tom :O r •. trrYn��r�Yp1,4, r ... YT t F P rr cF,:t- Iti, ,✓yy „ �y 9 e '4c' „w + "Fv a ._ �-` Sf <3 r . x sri ss�:. *a ¢1 f n . . *M v.. f < y '` 2 f kfr,t •,,,4,„44.-0.".+ ,' rrrr��r�� ,�]�h: 'nett '^gm{I :_ �.-- 'a a .:: r ` > .. ---,-0-0,W i >L a.C'•' ' tep.'fr,v,t� I 7. i t �I t !red e Ff'y e3� si `? �rR�`�`. r i :{:. t dW,. ' rry7i,3r� .t t i' r r r r 'y. I .r '"f `r v� w., f i pl ''''a-ht'' & +ri 6 x .._ -Cr- 1 'R.1 M nl --.T. `'` .,�•x,^71�r"iL if it I liv z'f11 _.x• s I :F.. � . y ¢ Rc-- 1a+1 3 "nunlr'c"'-1.VI 3 A c] 7, 6 1 II F� � 1�• S.••„• -ax !tn 2 e H1 T .r�ti 1 v ,a r1,3 >• .4,1'.-E. ,-�w 4,.!ar::. ` LL L->:S�1F r.v'in.� K f � r y l LF oaf ''�No ,FZ fills- p Ca''".`y'4 ter' l el q r,2 s r_ I,.. fA; r ue,y I T 7t^-pp 'N'"'J'cC`1u�.4d iw I ,?+jswP T"^ '� , x ,�/d r d �,� Gt,! f � eUl77. a , I. -.. S>° . _ v+ ,3. a + 'rf� -r //y""„,c7,ioa�"+ .4 'txA 1�� ,•.e j� A + s y66l,y 71 ""e�e-'A` ill FT.b' oY" 7 4 .su' tParl FC'ldi { { ,- r d„.a y.'S f ♦ :r �•i 1 t .� .vs . �� ..4.4-,...'''' 7 f 4 , o ArwNe� I 'iC � r ,d: '{,� • 3rii 1 -- ti' ,.. .. +fi 4 �7�� fli.df rnL 1 ,,.;: r L +tS. 7 > I -s' gyms....,-.., t i"�, us T 4.Ij,.Y r } 'i Up}^"'n,k - ,. °�v y 4 } 6'RI ' 1•rbG� ' '}AK' e H r 1 +c9• ii/ �. ° J r 1 4""'fr Cl heF A`e j GnYYnA , =.2!:-.‘,n.:,-1,-.4 .._.,' , ul y} ` •u{i . "4 �r 'tf _i{4,t " a• 1 +Lft t:P1M — ' °C' IFi , e. ti K' r s 'c ' 9 _ _ •°�°,. `Y° I ,ye l a -or"'G T - 1.;,411-110:: O tlwr,k4,1 r,'n.1� ti4, ft }74' *. r,A a -r . . 7iw „ �_ It ,p LROr't -- Sit...r"-re,,jo ' Gi 1/4 � :;-kL.t rL a. r ny'} Jt'i� a WFn Pn l rY' ^ NT�Nt "f,_, G'4° f .,,,i4. ..4j+ R r[4F ` I4 \; t i s ;;--.rk l- .• +ek 4•J A •t �Wi� �'«''x+'` w.4 ! f } Il'{flinLi aE4PPS E ;.r'' 1 -t�-Yt.. '6' , ,..,,y�r r I iYY j" Y en v¢i' a.. f �♦ Y t s� 1. ?�p{' :r . ., r 'w I�I n _ NK,.<.•..... � d /t?'°"'�I ate-N.ue.isr 1 m & ° i �C �w"56 . PT r ."7":�fi-to:-: ,..: es rkt f5 �r4--&AsELINEAVE m7'I / ;;51- i-1 { .+ Gfr'''/ * +�.4z0, -•��'.4'/ Si m. w tdi" ~ .Z:�N -., r-i I iFff' ,u .�G� R r 1 ;a� }a} u�3'E,hJ yY r FiC" f� � ' pV 1ki 'e3� J�'�.,�' � tea. p 7 �.[ t �a&"" ri 1{.t '� t"e'I IAf,N -}' ta^yr. .: 9, ✓.lr•6.a.,� �) A• i > y , - ,- .. , i1 1� a t +�?`Nn1 ‘111- Q 1 t'�it' �' j ,(i1 ', �. •y t "u• s -"l , a'- `�" �I G r` zi_ .1-.1„,i,,,,lav3j` r f' s m4 .„la r P,` a° ".t4U R7:.. - iL'Ill°`n- 17.4e <s ,;Tik - .,.i `.,:rru l+ ;27.. ` 4,, ,s.,'r:5h..!_7'�..G.W..f.au _+.• 4,..,,,:.,,,,,,,4-V �tL�: Source: NAIP and San Bernardino County 2006 � L IL� x 1,500 750 0 1,500 Exhibit • ® � °o� Feet d ac a9 `,ini'y .',aria@ Map Michael Hrandm w A sociares 23060012•0212007 i 3-Aenal.mxd INFRA' STUDY,°_A.°,?AVENUE pm SIDE., PROJECT RANCHO Cl.1CAMOI' GT,-^•F, B & C- 54 r', } a &« _. tgm k , . - r— •--- ---- -�--- of �H�+. ,�g-JidnF —1.. E __' 5 i 1� • r .-- :I ; r T r 1{ 4 t 1; - if- aI .C.: t-- i: it ,. _ gi-(vou'll,-'4i;"•;, ' • . ,-- „pi, . . i; _ .1,-„,' - .ifip ..-, c% t Vr i. �.It KI C:. K" i" 5 T'� r rr } 3 L i 0 E, I ��F�rj'Pr3ttrW i.• '�° J Xi � 0. r ...,.. li, ,, - i n1 a g5,,.1', .11. : t S ill I ra i z.,-fit+ s ,,,,,I,' ! }k ,?tl µ. , E .4$1"l' 4 •J� e. . �.. ?' .,,..,, Ylbi', ?'"','''t'',.I ;{ , Sp�xa�i . ;. i ',igi�. 5 t ;I Ad55 2y j ,J I � i ,, i:: 74� I _ t 7�f ±r•Tpf t 1W^�oy x; K°, "'r't f^a" {�ids*,dl f �"'' ',.' ; , i • - 14,0' •', '„,*,,*,-5'0T.V 1:4-1,--' -', •'ell - tJ `DJt t" �Sd i1 4. til S*: t)�,1 e ,° Y'1 g E jxr2 t1 fps i' I! i , 1 ; , s� M1 411, 4,' ` Y 4_I- �- I y j.:, r` �} ,4.,..,;-4.,.._t j0, lip`•i 'i, 6. ^ Vii. ■Ty"' ( F 4 se 1a. a ., rs M , r• ., i ' :';.-,-,14,'",.. ,. ite - ' ig �.' t1 �' -- .■ ` :_fm: - ," , ---—7 1...%. ,.., .,9', %.,:,..:.,4. _.' -', : . I = V ' '1: -- - = A t. .mss..., E i l _ -9-t f'' _.,,,... ,,,.., 3 iti.... { -__._•-..,nw e,tL. . 2.`'7- t r:c -. 2 _. • Y } ( . B & C- 55 I• rrhn • ,... , ,, • :, rr b I r ._ r s .1rc r y" �,. :F- w..(q. a'GQ Y'IZ f ,. ' 1 °' '2: . ms it .-, rg J -,+'. i'� F ' S -" ma' - � ' s tto ai -- ,2 y"4F-i *+ _ 1 4, Y 1 -'L'+ .t1'y 4 i zY,- 0E-Siy-yv 5. , -h h _-. - 1. r- 4 t ' is �-"'-��-,. -l' 'xz.�' d.1 p t.Y w .rte rr 7 aYr 42 . t 'd'[<r - Va1Y .r a 7-' yMi f A1"r,Lt,„, ~ 1 .. rY v - . rya `r '.t '+>F.r•..✓'"_. - ,. r - - ."Y�_. :.rn,.. - a•.,. �^.'i .. , _g Photograph 5a: View northeast into project area from southwest corner of property. •.\. , . .„,. . ... —r*'r- 4,4'''' 9 slii "' r' 1 '.H ja: a '''''':44-' ,1t ''''''',=•-4;'-'-',.? " 1 sin , F. p.. Y:.. ' r. ..__ ,Y,';',-,•-•= 2,. r xy ->a : .r •-4,,,,,,.� , a �n.�i^r^. txs l' z SL '�., ,Ira r A iti ��i#3FY�+�r�,,n�r. %r{ M - Cs k dk z fr1S ,.,.s r - i ye,• r < » { 4i c ?qj,I s .f :r a. {r yi tY ,� .' Y 1 t1i.. /{4:4. Y "�+I� w-.� T . x ku fh. Y .. F IN ht i+.r�.`G !,.- 1.. i^-c a �,: "": e . '�'0"' `�-[ '�" f'#`' ° `-4iY.� " q,a a M,:-m..tt Ab +'•w. !. '^ *41,: �Tx s A!... "}`t r.+n.',y,. ?a V.:.-- .y n N r.',-i,.:. j -f -' x NF-4 yyair z.• �� . °'_+'-T. 's- G rh:.t�Y . �. 4" ..".T _ A < 4" F..t M. `*i ..*000) : + f s :'. Photograph 5b: View to north along East Avenue from southwest corner of project site. Source: Michael Brandman Associates,2007. 9999 Exhibit 50 11E1INCI Site Photographs 5a and 5b Michael Brandman Associates 23060012•02/2007 15_site_photos_(5a)and(5b).cdr INITIAL STUDY, EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA B & C- 56 a : r. 4• h • • • E P - o A f+ Fk' _ �!_ u r it f e t o- +r ✓r 0 =± r rY • } 4" dxgie + M ml-rPt r• rJ y r".%W :1;5r 'i'r 't. . 6'` .,x 11 t `3 A 4k "' QM kj".--.-,4,-2...„,4-',,0,-,"„,,1*..i,,,4'T.-v.,744:27-''. Photograph 5c: View of site to east from midway along western boundary of site. • • • _.. 1 ,0.x4+-^r h'f•f'r Se T to .-.r.. i A i..'”- 't*./ i j d a }}K } r r I L !if' j - --- .'Ry �ttr a t o' °"',,i rn4 .e NAa`r ;a v=,:i, ,. ,f'-fh .A.."F- -"' r em �' 'f x__, u,, . _.;o:t*ffi"YS 1 .549 7 " b '1. . S , h x :r 70r,- -4 4J2 g ,• ,, :•--t- ,-," ' { `t, l4-V M` i n. -. ,:; t : - `•++ q " 6 v (r-wi vi t " •"-.".,.,"ma„wrK-�A c'si',s ' `N, ths.;„t at r v`__.Y r s :,, 2::. JHr• , •,T t ,1 1 iC b • {;:twy °�"-' r y i w rR:n �ri i.+� ;-kos ' ny��x , r_ ` � ,-}at� . � r wl a ti y ,`a"xt- .a,.w V L -,,,, _,a r` -b �� . , n , -'," , tea"Zs ' n'� .� " 'r . - • kil S' '� � {' "t ,. . NxH7 "� 1` V3._;.r „ t sA Y py -tirey' o „y � H �`F - 4 1::4 - at .' �C .'-' . " a .✓ t v :,'-7,4! 5 q4 �n P v +, *w ' - :s 9 i,,- ., .-,.. { 4qr t I ' -3 ,i ' c• a .'• : a . -:•+ p b . . � ..: " 4, - i� Y '4-r aj-y"i k r y w k .qm.. .x wn t .. ri�ypr ,:6. -vim J F>M a>�J .R Photograph 5d: View of site to southeast from midway along western project boundary. Source: Michael Brandman Associates,2007. • SI ®S Exhibit 5 ®DENS Site Photographs 5C and 5d Michael Brandman Associates 23060012•0212007 15_site_photos_(5c)and(5d).cdr INITIAL STUDY,EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT B & C-57 RANCHO CUCAMONGA., GA 1 1110 I 1 1, �ia4�^ ! 4," . !r:4:-.','-:',.....*..1 .-., � --' :.11. • p" a - `.4, �1 1 Y.., f40 �i i 3 :M"N ,,,A .,y4 p i 7 4 a � ' r k rr . .t msµ, b y t 'r � i i' cfrt a u � P :f a c ,Uaf :emu ey : h ' °i, k # '1 t 1 , :a i : � i 11 4J tx' tj s ! , 1;.,L .. , zj r 1 , �, .'e r u _ A f c° ' ,S ..ir . c ^• r 3. �S , , y £; . q7 ' x 4., � ;,-:,..T.:.; l ' x mk Y 1,}kA" 4 i !'Yf I �.64 .f.,a . b l f f X " , ak 4 1C` ' � ', .?I .4 L, .- . :;. ::t,.". Y f ' L * i v, fi^ iy � , .. ' r2 �s"z u " ,:' " i :.I-.:ji r �x .. ra'`s '`".' , �" .ter-, .� r. ,.... Photograph 5e: View to northeast from center of project site. 1 l III i Ii...,.., iV '. r, k t. 1.. t0.‘. :,..t ,.. .. • .. . . . f •: i.. h• f.0' aC q cx,,,�.,tro -.....40r, - ._^ w'. rY�1'Pt Yt w� " p. w '1:;';' y} u .E 4- -�- .:£^5, a a A e";-V- :t . .7.A . `` f't 7. .a "� emrt kNk'"'. "d 4 'f• 1t4 '-7. .*:*41 . ,: s....,:,1-,--1 - t wp j, .j a i.c ,�,,,:.a C $ b `f N .:41d :1 `°' ,, ,,S . i":N b ; r5 'i. 7.'� .nom-k '2� 4.,r .T "'� iR '"`—.,�`° r 'q`' N �'rc,-'.4"��,,,. : _gp..,"`. aa^.r''�:-.)M v P....,4"7.L;_ > ' ,rp9 "�'`°7-,ii ': gl'SO- r..,'m4 �C=43-.r 't A � � '.k+ Yal".s y+� 'ham tea.: ra a t. ua. ,,-`'w^ r 's'--7td_:�+ `'1°.— ..-, --'r.' L ,'ix r^ `s- r;,.7.,k ..;, -'' . r - ,°.«4 , - 4 .,. '...„ -5.,^t -+'°x.,;c ": ,. 4�° 'y -+�.r:"&:4-'-'7:'1';';''''''•''''''',':='•'''?' zenY"'+n''R`.' .,,'" ". .. x .'r'� .y ai ,. t.'` tr., eta r -t r Y -,,,, . ,4 .a,: y �:d," -,mac e .!' `',"� , ._, '..,'°n °,, t. ,j n,1{n_..., ," '',4,-''''-''—:-.4.- i^i'^'C: m .;gal-c ;. g' 're "�� »"r .�§ .,,' F -. Aa _ yr, ':- : . :yT. rta t.' i>K }4,, f d" r1 - � r{_ �yg,( i>d 'F f°? 1".,4-041:� 1 - �1,t, _'v.� ■N+,7 X' h 7C x F " ,G�'. T!` t∎7.' .,g< Z 2 3 Mc �" a _w uz ^ a <x . _ .s. .._ F ,. ` �,'�� , �. �'e•%? Photograph 5f: View to west from center of project site. Source: Michael Brandman Associates,2007. IN NNS Exhibit 50 ®®®CII Site Photographs 5e and 5f Michael Brandman Associates 23060012^02/2007 15_site_,photos_(5e)and(5f).cdr INITIAL STUDY,EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT B & C 58 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA', i • I(1 i r lr t ,, , I n 0/1.t, � --� �F•Vii, ! ( yr" '- :M .: i,� L 4e's,4fx -_ .-■ . .• �• 7': .7 yli Ce '. es�- 7 is !.u. e r '{ t t I rr,4 4_5• � F b1 w t _ f" '4 d nidj r 0• — '... t. ..... ..:.. i� , n k ▪ ,.... ,'*'aw, E_ axL.r , �. .. Photograph 5g: View to east along southern boundary of site. • • ... r 1 ott ry, � l ' '.J I -0 t "I'''.- � i I jr t ! 2 }�f "- 2••••,`5.7 T 'i" i r w s iA,y,�6+PF .••••. ?.p alaas�;�s•t{� t.'*.,..i4 +�. -rat'i a i r "x'�'F,s'a..wrc�a ,,,,• '''x sa.� iY. 's-� "3`- rt 4.--. •g ,Ix kh ..tl * ., .. s. 'fir+'°.�`�.m.�2.'�e• s - ,ltk CY.... �iY `,..--. JL -,✓.nic y .Nr �' Ak - e >. - t `��+.s.....4. .4—.S, M•F I yy R „mss "s „i2-`YA 't €L�+�,e:, F J.. £t...; Sx :^e.1jr -'t� ,T, :• s .,,,, `x `.,L•• ,`...- .. ,,••,1!'.:i 1 �j +s v'a'1".ulsk....., ,e-"s4G: -,'.Y.,..„,"x 4 M:.• '11-:,,,*,s -a [ Q1�4s tii Y�rle�Sf !4.,.','4,,,,4„,,,,r74-41,„,`,.,! K a ' .. ,Photograph 5h: View to east from across East Avenue towards location of proposed project entrance. • Source: Michael Brandman Associates,2007. ®ti9N Exhibit 5 ACE®I Site Photographs 5g and 5h Michael Brandman Associate:: 23060012•02/2007 15_site_photos_(5g)and(5h).cdr INITIAL STUDY,EAST AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT B & C- 59 RANCHO CUCAMON A. Cl. ,4 -,.,0 ' City of Rancho Cucamonga • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 2. Related Files: Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 3. Description of Project: A proposal to subdivide four (4) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. • TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT -A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide four (4) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Variance DRC2009-00020. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Mike Harrision, Director Operations and Planning Chaffey Joint Union High School District 211 W 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential • 6. Zoning: Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project area consists of five (5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is vacant property where a subdivision into residential lots (Tract 17651) was recently approved. To the west, are additional single-family • residences. To the south is a vacant parcel that is owned by Caltrans and used. by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this parcel is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east are vacant parcels. The zoning B & C- 60 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 2 of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda • Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES— National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System • NOx— Nitrogen Oxides • ROG— Reactive Organic Gases PM10— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD— South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP— Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G— Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or"Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (X) Aesthetics ( ) Agricultural Resources (X)Air Quality (X) Biological Resources (X) Cultural Resources (X) Geology & Soils ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (X) Hydrology &Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (X) Noise ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( )Transportation/Traffic ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance • B & C- 61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 3 • DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that although the proposed proj4 could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this a beca se revisions in the project.have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. IT`G ED NEGATIVE DECLARATIO will be prepared. • Prepared By: / Date: 27Iaaj Reviewed By: n, Date: � ) I ', ( • • • B & C- 62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 4 Less Than • Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Ponificant With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No ImoaImpactImp Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of • Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Homes are not part of this application and will be submitted for review at a future date. Design review is required prior to approval of the homes. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) Homes are not part of this application. However, when the project site is developed with houses, the project will increase the number of street lights and residential lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of street lights will be required to comply with City•standards including requirements for shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Residential lighting is generally not a source of substantial glare as such lighting is limited to within the confines of the home. Exterior residential lighting will be required to comply with City standards for maximum height and setbacks for light poles. The impact is not considered significant. • B & C- 63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wn Than PP g Significant Mitigation Si Impact t No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide • Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to General Plan Table RC-2. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and • planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council, The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by , limited residential development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. There are no agricultural uses within one mile of the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) applicable air quality plan? • b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? B & C- 64 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 6 Less Titan • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: =elenfialty wnn Than PP 9 Significant corporiate Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4,3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. ' According to the Air Quality Analysis Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on June 3, 2009, the project will not exceed the SCAQMD regional significance emission thresholds during construction or operation; the construction emissions from the project • would not exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD localized significance thresholds; the project is consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP); the project would not result in a cumulative impact; and the project would not create objectionable odors that affect sensitive receptors. b) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the• • construction site for City verification. B & C- 65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with man PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with .local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board IRWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMfo) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMfg emissions. • 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. • B & C- 66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 8 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (No2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term (Operational) Emissions - In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. • 12) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- • polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located immediately adjacent to residences. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During • construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. B & C- 67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polennal With With Than PP g Significant corporiate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be from cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and, therefore, are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species • identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery • • sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State • habitat conservation plan? B & C- 68 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 10 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wtn nan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The project site is located in an area that is generally undeveloped with limited residential development to the north and west. The alignment of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) is to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. The project site is located within a habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources — the Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS). According to the Biological Resources Assessment Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on March 4, 2011, a RAFSS plant community covers approximately 2.9 acres of the project site. The remainder of the site contains Coastal sage scrub (21.7 acres) and non-native grasses (28.5 acres). The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1) The applicant shall purchase at a 1:1 ratio 2.9 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub RAFSS habitat designated for conservation or pay in-lieu fees. Evidence of applicable mitigation agreements approved by CDFG shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of grading permits. • According to the Biological Resources Assessment Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on September 8, 2008, no SBKR were trapped and SBKR was determined not to be present on the project site in during a trapping survey conducted in June 2005; a subsequent survey was conducted in July 2008 and the results were negative. According to the same Biological Resources Assessment Report, CAGN was not observed within the project site and the species was considered to be absent from the project site; a set of subsequent surveys were conducted in April — June 2008 and the results were negative. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the presence/absence of this species following protocols established by the United States Fish and Wild Life Services (USFWS) prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that SBKR is detected or • observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA (or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the purchase/conservation of off-site suitable habitat that is known to support SBKR at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 3) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the presence/absence of this species following protocols established by the USFWS prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event • that CAGN is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the B & C- 69 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact FESA (or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the timing of construction activities outside of the breeding season (February 15 to August 31) and/or purchase/conservation of off-site suitable habitat that is known to support CAGN at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable • species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 4) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided by an appropriate buffer, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left'the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. • There is suitable habitat for Plummer's mariposa lily, Parry's spineflower, and mesa horkelia. According to a focused plant survey conducted in June 2008, Plummer's mariposa lily (175 individual plants) was determined to be present throughout the eastern portion of the site. Parry's spineflower and mesa horkelia were not observed within the project site. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 5) The applicant shall prepare a mitigation plan containing provisions requiring the transplantation and/or seeding of Plummer's mariposa lily plants to an off-site protected area suitable for supporting Plummer's mariposa lily. The number of transplantingslseeding shall be equal or greater than the 175 plants existing on the property. This mitigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits • and shall be done in coordination with the CDFG. b) The project site is located in an area with natural communities. However, no riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) According to the Biological Resources Assessment Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on March 4, 2011, the site contains a single non-wetland drainage feature that runs north to south through the center of the project site. The drainage is a wholly intra-state feature with no downstream connectivity to navigable waters and no existing or probable use in interstate commerce. Therefore, it is not subject to Federal jurisdiction under Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Because the drainage does not contain waters of the United States within the meaning of 33 CFR 328.3, the feature will not be subject to RWQCB jurisdiction under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The drainage does have a definable streambed and is therefore subject • to the jurisdiction of the CDFG. This drainage feature includes approximately 0.06 acre of "waters of the state." Impact to the drainage would require a permit from the CDFG (Streambed Alteration Agreement). Notwithstanding the isolation of the feature, if the B & C- 70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 12 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wh Than PP g Significant torpor to Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impecl water provides beneficial uses to the state, the RWQCB may assert jurisdiction of the drainage as "waters of the state" pursuant to provisions of the State Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 6) Necessary permits from the relevant regulatory agencies (CDFG, RWQCB) must be obtained for impacts to jurisdictional features and/or waters. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide evidence of applicable permits to the City. d) The proposed project is not within a significant wildlife movement corridor or nursery site. Development of the proposed project will not have a•substantially adverse impact on wildlife movement corridors or nursery sites. e) There are heritage trees, including numerous Eucaplyptus trees planted in windrows, on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The applicant is proposing to preserve as many trees on the project site as possible. However, there are some trees that will be required to be removed to allow grading, the construction of homes, and/or the construction of Community and Local Feeder trails. The applicant has submitted an application to remove these trees — Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. To mitigate the impact of the removal of the trees, the applicant shall: 7) Trees that are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a • matching species of a minimum 15-gallon size. • 8) Tree planting shall follow the requirements established in the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. • f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State habitat conservation plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (V) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: • a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. B & C- 71 Initial Study for • City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 13 • • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han PP g Significant coiporiate Significant l Impact Incorporated Impact i Impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its • archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require 'incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • • Propose mitigation measures' and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the • sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have .been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation • measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: B & C- 72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 14 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Nth Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The project site is located in an area that is generally undeveloped with limited residential development to the north and west. The alignment of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) is to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest • the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code • (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) • B & C- 73 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) V) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the.Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes approximately 1 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2.5 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is • 11.5 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 13.5 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM" emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM" emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to • minimize PM" emissions from the site during such episodes. • B & C- 74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 16 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very tow Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand (SpC) Soil association and Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand (SpC) Soil association and Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project proposes the installation of septic systems that will be required to be permitted • by the City's Building and Safety Department and meet all related environmental regulations. Additionally, the project shall be required to comply with Chapter 5 of the Santa Ana Region Basin Plan. If the site is unsuitable for the installation of septic systems, the applicant shall be required to connect to the City's existing sewer system per Section 4.7.6 Threshold 4.7e of the General Plan that limits the number of septic systems if the site is overlain by Cieneba and Ramona soil types. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? • B & C- 75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wlh han PP g Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impap Impapa ct e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 • miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and • maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil. Additionally, through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. ' The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There is a school, Summit Intermediate Junior High School, located approximately 1/4 mile north of the project site at 6061 East Avenue. The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. • Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. B & C- 76 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 18 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnh Than PP g Potential Incorporated Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 6.5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. The project is located with the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. The City recognizes the risk and has adopted policies and Standard Conditions that limit uses to Very Low density residential development and Hillside • residential uses in these areas to limit property exposed to wildland fire hazards. The project shall prepare a Fire Protection Plan to outline appropriate measures to address fire hazards. Therefore, the following wildland fire mitigation measure shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: • 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code (CBC), which includes building standards for the Wildand-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the • • course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? B & C- 77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Sims No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? • j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General • Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • • Perform inspections of all BMPs. B & C- 78 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 20 .Less Than • Significant Less Potentially wpm Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant mp ad t Incorporated Imact Impact . Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by the applicant's representatives on October 20, 2008, which identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and• non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: • 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize 'soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality • Management Plan (WQMP) prepared on October 20, 2008, by the applicant's B & C- 79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wh non PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact representative to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by the applicant's representative on October 20, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project • will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be approximately 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No • impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. • e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, • B & C- 80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga , TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 22 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a • Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. (If the project is located with the 100-year flood hazard area, use this paragraph: The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development is adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain.) No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from • seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain B & C- 81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga- TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated_ Impact t Impact streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and is generally characterized by limited residential • development to the north and west, vacant property to the east, and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) to the south. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the northwest. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Very Low Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is located in an area that is generally undeveloped with limited residential development to the north and west. The alignment of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) is to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources — the Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (RAFSS). The mitigation measures and discussion as indicated in Section 4, Biological Resources, a) 1 —5 shall reduce the impact to less-than-significant. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? • b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 8 & C- 82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 24 Less Than • Significant Loss Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially tiga Than PP 9 Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (• ) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels • existing without the project? • e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) . For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project site is adjacent to the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and East Avenue. The freeway surface is below grade to allow the freeway to pass beneath the East Avenue roadway near the west side of the project site. Further to the east the freeway surface, is closer to the elevation of the project site. East Avenue is slightly above the elevation of the project site. The applicant has submitted an application for a variance to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes — Related file: Variance DRC2009-00020. According to the Preliminary Noise Assessment prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on October 9, 2008, the following mitigation measure will reduce the noise impacts caused by the freeway to less-than-significant levels: Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise • mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The B & C- 83 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially Wm Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Si ion SiNo Impact Incorporated Impact t Impa ct Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) The applicant shall construct a block wall noise barrier along the south, east, and west perimeters of the project site. The height and location of these walls shall be per Exhibit 7 of the Preliminary Noise Assessment. Interior Specific mitigation measures for interior noise are not possible at this time as the project does not include houses. Mitigations measures cannot be established without knowing the design of the houses. Therefore: 3) When an application for the development of homes on the project site is • submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The • proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly. noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. • The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the • B & C- 84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 26 Less Than • Significant Less Potentially Nh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigator Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes • that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The site is located approximately 6.5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is off-set north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. • 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and • businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area that is generally undeveloped with limited residential development to the north and west. The alignment of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) is to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant. Because the property is vacant, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. c) The project site is vacant. Because the property is vacant, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. • B & C- 85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ia Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? () () () (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) I ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210), would be served by a fire station located approximately 1.5 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the • need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The • nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Park, is located 0.40 mile north from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in • library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less-than-significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space B & C- 86 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 28 Less Than • Significant Less • Potentially With man Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant p Sic No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. RECREATION. Would the project • a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area currently served'by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Park, is located 0.40 mile north from the project site at 5939 East Avenue. This project is not proposing a substantial number of new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay • Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? B & C- 87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 29 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Stem licant Mitigation Si nt No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 988 vehicle trips daily. The • proposed project contemplates the subdivision of the property which will allow for the development of 76 lots. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each residence will generate 13 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each residence will generate 1.75 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On • May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent, arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 6.5 miles northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, the site is off-set north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project site is located in an area that is generally undeveloped with limited residential development to the north and west. The alignment of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) is to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project is residential. Although houses are not part of the proposal, when the houses • are submitted for review, adequate parking, specifically an enclosed garage and a driveway, in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code will be required. No impacts are anticipated. • B & C- 88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 30 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wa Than Significant Mitigatt ion Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) The project is residential and therefore features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction are not required. • 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? . c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to • handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. B & C- 89 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 31 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ignifi wm Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or • wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop • the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 • General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that B & C- 90 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 32 adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, • Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. The project site is located in an area that is generally undeveloped with limited residential development to the north and west. The alignment of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) is to the south. The site has been minimally disrupted along the west perimeter for partial construction of East Avenue and along the south perimeter for an access road. The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources — the Coastal California Gnatcatcher (CAGN), the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), and Riversidean alluvial • fan sage scrub (RAFSS). According to the Biological Resources Assessment Report prepared by Michael Brandman Associates on March 4, 2011, a RAFSS plant community covers approximately 2.9 acres of the project site. The remainder of the site contains Coastal sage scrub (21.7 acres) and non-native grasses (28.5 acres). According to the same . study, no SBKR were trapped and SBKR was determined not to be present on the project site in during a trapping survey conducted in June 2005; a' subsequent survey was conducted in July 2008 and the results were negative. Also, CAGN was not observed within the project site and the species was considered to be absent from the project site; a set of subsequent surveys were conducted in April — June 2008 and the results were negative. There is suitable habitat for Plummer's mariposa lily, Parry's spineflower, and mesa horkelia. According to a focused plant survey conducted in June 2008, Plummer's mariposa lily (175 individual plants) was determined to be present throughout the eastern portion of the site. Parry's spineflower and mesa horkelia were not observed within the project site. • Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per • Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such B & C- 91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 33 • effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Air Quality Analysis Report Michael Brandman Associates, June 3, 2009 • (T) Biological Resources Assessment Report Michael Brandman Associates, September 8, 2008 (T) Updated Biological Resources Assessment Report Michael Brandman Associates, March 4, 2011 (T) San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Presence/Absence Trapping Studies Michael Brandman Associates, September 9, 2008 (T) Coastal California Gnatcatcher Focused Survey • • Michael Brandman Associates, September 8, 2008 (T) Preliminary Noise Assessment Mestre Greve Associates, October 9, 2008 • (T) Tree Survey and Arborist Report Michael Brandman Associates, May 15, 2007 • (T) Water Quality Management Plan By the Applicant, October 20, 2008 • • • B & C- 92 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 Page 33 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: c Date: April 27, 2011 Print Name and Title: Don Bertucci, Assistant Superintendent of Business • • • I • B & C- 93 ll Iai • >}•# y City of Rancho Cucamonga 4%tolbi MITIGATION MONITORING. 4 5 ,. PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: . 1.. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. �. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: • City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 . B & C- 94 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT18122 — MIKE HARRISON —CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached • hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • B & C- 95 w • a :=�'; N fl^w: 0 0 ci = co (O Z r�'ik..,, N N N N N = 1: = N R T .: Vii. C) a 'c w saa 0 R U > ❑ .-.y . ' " O r w O Q N O O d 1: N a as r: .c w . r • '= r w c er a U U U � Y = 5 > a U a a a �w Q 9�jI N C C C C C C C Q .'' w O ��. a °. a a en a O 'o O O O O O It e a .. E.'d_ m 0 a) o a)CC CL cC I- 4h:44:. -I ` C ''p'--- N • Y o U "a c r o LLI u- 1,iii U 0 U m U _ as in4.1, Z (V fl }i 0 , _ N h < N d C ua.a O . O Q 4 r . a 5 i' m F co R d : ` ❑ 0 0 .O � ❑ K . a d m m Z H y O I" m N " e- ocf0 -Ocs°. s >� � omuo ,=2� Brio ❑ �co N ° sv ' y ° moo ` 02 � x � @ ° C� Z L .E1Dc � � m coaya. Uas a) a) t 0 U w 0 t6 ca) 8- ° m0 ` .=.. 0Q = � a U Q N .m 0 N T a° a c 0 N O .� o ° N > ° � _ o C> d !"--dal:y C 0 C —• (a O) co (a a) — " C N a) T O ca o �_ C E N N O a) C T o j N c -c° -- -c U N t of >. 2 > - ! 0N ° � n °'•0aa)i0 °- Ec2 mE ° i a 0 � .. >' 4 D N c) N 0 c.`.� 0 ° C •O 'C O ( Q N .° N d N C w to1., NC0 -0C = ` co -V) O N 'O _ CoQ mmN 8 N .9 C _ ,,.�,,t N a) O v_1 a) O ,c U N O = N x V N 'O G i, c m )n N > o ° emu No ° (n °1c — o cQ > I- Z 5� a) (°nc E �, _ a) EE ..--. >, ENON a� a) o K N C O. ° N "NO U O E 0 m O c y � V @ 'O y W ° O O. �. d = t , c.0 o a °°- o o � � o 0 0 o 0 a) N 0 -°° o) a aoi o c o w 0 _ 5R . r 5 °- m a' •O co . Z d ca cCF o' 0 ` � .- - � � = ocsoa❑ CN ao Eo c � o • d �' c e• O o N Q) .N a) -c .c N 3 N N E '" fo a) a) ° -C Q O N O IL ��,• C c T-. � J N — 0) C •- C C «) O N O --• C 'O E N m O W 'a E z�` w °) o � � c L o a °) E C E - )Ct=0L_ E m o t c w � a) d _ rn0 `�`,,; ° @o) mccin aoioaac) .°-0 " 0imE ao -. ? aaia o N -O 'Q w C 't U a E O N N O O aa)) aa)) o-5 o- > O N N N — N tt m N 0 U 5 o d = 2.E ¢y Qoo ° E ° a -o -° a) a) a SUE2a ¢ aar QC ¢ aa c B & C- 96 0 f./ I- C 0 � . 0 c £ 0. 0 0 u U c C m 0 c v 'Cr c CO Z N N N N c V c c c c c to m TS C m F. m . 13 • Y O m CO > O C 0 '. a m ct o u • 5 > a as 0 Q < < a < < 0 y N 0 N N 0 C C C C C C M CO m CO CO c m _ c C CL n n a n o C C p 0 0 °O o 0 0 O O .0 .0 U U U cr) o 03 3 3 3 3 3 3 0) 2 o) 2 o).2. 0) 2 o 2 aa) C m m m a) m C i C y CO C N C y C > d- a) Q) 4) U) 0) J 0 J 0 J O J 0 J 0 a) P > W CC CC CC K Cl o D 0 DU D ° D 0 CC C) T Co -47 c N Cc O �-. 0 . = O 5 U U U 0 0 U U 0 0 0 0 N C) m C s o LT) .- C C 0 0 a2 a U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •� 0 0 0! _ m m m m m m co m m O O C E a U b t 5 -L -0 >, C a C 0 C cli C ai C C O ,t/) Q.� m y m c in 0 O C O J o U N 03 0 _ N T U p '� O m ° ps a) ?A co .a• C � oo p � U ,N QcE ° cv 2 ° o E mJ cc°1iow 3 'o mo- UU .E U¢ oo 2w n la u, (13 ii) Ea d (0 E Lo m � ¢ m U ° c m a c "O- O) 0 V U5 w m y 0 2 0 L a O L m CO J m N 0 L@ N O) m (n D�o > j a) m U N U a � 17 N V) m 0 m � cn•c . o 3 T. 2 • L U L N_ m ._. N o_ m m L ` C 'C 0 J L L m 0- M to _ L+ C W E (Ts ry > m 0- 'JO C m N 3 'O CO v 0 - rn 3 N • oc ° Y -0 E Uc morn yEE Lm m oa) 2co mE E - a) .-E) o � Nm o `nd Cp > OCJ o_ o La > ia m w x Ev o 0)-c a - N '- - >' n� � � m `� � 0 o m m p � N C J C N 0) V(Na co a o m O a > o m 0 0 � m o w v c 0i a QC a) a> a) c- � '� 0 .0 Z "o c > a > wa 0 n—° v !L) ° m o mo > > L`� C7 mac c m v y p j al m p 0 m a1 J U a CD m e O m C m U Q .N m . .+ O m O) p '> > N ... m m .N O c x m E ° 0 L O) J CO CO L m c co 0 3 Nci rn.6 >. C6 .-U0N 3a � ,� c > f) a) � o � — mUD_ « �° o m ' ca ACC d ID Q) a '5 ° m X -o a co rn CD TCp �� D: E y m m o m ' `. — E °- N co Ic ' m m mm a) c c 'E m Ev cop ca _2 acme - oLk_ o o • L a m U > c c (a co a m O a N a (m!) -O m a m O) L. m 0 0 . `� 0 N - m e N N m N O 0 0 J m 0 m m o Y a o .0 2 -c O C N a'0 Q C N := E R-0 U co U m a C ' 4= E m 0 > m m L a W U O) O E C ° C "(p J ' .o m C J a U m O CO ma dN COa) 3 NN a = ° 2J0 a) d a) E rna 2L a) 0 CO -0 CO CO rv) 0 ) > � = B & C- 97 a, w c 1' a) a • E 0 0 - « U c• C to 0 c v v v v v V) Z N N N N N N "-- N a N '. To y'kn?s'z a 'c s `, > 0 .3v fi = w • 0 fir;ao u rt F. - 0 w iIIEiIEiEi 07• n as a • ` C L) �G°,TgF. • 0 tid C Ca ,yi` O • ii. U U U U U UU zR m K M as d c 'a h f O.* s cc• 2 m m m m 0 m `-L'',,ss a N Y u) a) a) p. a) 6-. 3 a) N - C7 O C LIuhiIIHU ; L@-. d Q @ Q 0 as f• t C a) fo a) O o C N @ 'O !a L LL C C a) N O W > O 0 O .0 p rG a) a) o a) O ` , p Q '- a) `p 'C o a .2 0 L j "O "0 d L Y> a) C@ ON #"ys (a CC T E d O 'r E -- a) @ m ''7 ° ' a) O O a 'T`.'`.f @ m TO S C 0 3 t 5 '5 u) m 3 0 -=o E a fi,%*a,:;, 7 .n O. d 0` L L -Q a) Q- a) o- m Lc L ,b., m U w@ a) Q)C @p T E ° c N L U °) m r,6=�, m w o @ O r0 w c c L N N = a7 '— 0 aP p u c � o .Q @ o0 c a) m 3 U @mo a) a) t 9u: w @ ' ca - m 0. 0) (1) L m(a L a) O -Q O L 'U .Y` @ m @ :3 a) o ccE -O CE cQ2 N :. a) 0C .0 UQN v @5 ; uC E Z o CO L N y C 0 a n a) u) O co N 2 O L- N - 7 >. U 0 m ° NR p _ c@ D _ ' ct GI 15) Dm1 CD ° 0 d ° UO E ° O ! U )0 O E a U @ o -Q a) u > y w C Q @o La3 b m m cic N O o `r � @ @a TS � QO "2c Ut RI @c S3 � w w ) a) a cco > @ oc a (7) a) -oE mai � mm [0 0 'm' aCCm; E ` 3 t � C @ 3 a C a @ (DE C . u)-_ V O)a C a) N > U c c Ti _ u) e O 3 ka, @ > O p C d O @ ,n o) Q - a) _ L N @ = a) , L a) > T ` LE HL U U J O N O Od2 QL@ Q . Qw03a o my Hd' 'OW 0 O B & C- 98 a) 0 . I- c oe wa 00 •oV . C C 10 O V) Z N N N Cu a 'O C a) w a) W 0 d 03 C O w L CO 0 0 L w y r. c) 0 5 > U U • w • (0 c c a3 a) c a Cl .. o 0 t o `o cc _!,- 0 a3i • L > > N- a) a) H > cL EC 0 a C 0 'C C N r0 s , _ N o O 2 L CO CO v CO CD 9 O • ern :14 C C O O CL 2 o .- U U ix a a d O in L c L a) c L_ N N O N O 0 CO "O (n CO 0) O) U) O V a) a) N a) in 0 ° 0 ° 0,.c o 0 ° 0 '0 y N U) _C N � C >> CO L C 2 ' N L Y $ 0 •N C) ii C)'-' 07 "0 0 f0 cO Y Cu :° 3 �1 0 w d o c m c m >. r 41 -c @ Q— o >o C a) a a) O N c. r ° .0)... p] L > c .. a T a a— a) Cu co L. o la 3 O. a) c col Ea CO `oamEN coda o oa) n B° roo .0 = E V! w-.. O t LO C Q'� a3 N N �_ N LL aa) 3 c0 N LO. N C - L ? a) 0 a N o)CO C d C c E E N N °U in a) O C .Q U cu N ` -o N_ a) L _ ° O E O ." W 0_ @ • 0 `0 O — L a7 N it' a) 0 N L ° 0 a E 0 ° m 0 m E V 7.--3 O al a) Ch N .c E N o O Od Z L 'O `) LL a) ._ wo ° ° 3 o E 0) a o C o o _m ° o o v o d .E o c u 3 E cn > m ° -o of3c � o o wv >. c1° EaoQen z w m Dm � C T U ul -0 a) 'o c a t O O -- 0) O N. al p CO O Q a) a7 • N LI m O N C O d O c C V) ._ WC- d y0 W J N L -0 C a) 0 CO Y rn a o m -o _ a) . y E -moo n o vi a) 'E a y E .C. -'o m L 3 ° 0 m LL m .a) ° `� m Cu c d y � � � = a LL N � � 'O O N j p° a c — en w ea C y c a) N '> o Z p 5 0 c .a. N ul •Z 0 c .0 N o o E � � m aL' a of m `o o c� -o a°i � •••••• c mco o ¢ .�' °-'@ E n a C — 0 N 0 a) ° c r j N a) �j C — N O O N ° 2 c ` O U o N a7 a) a) • f '� .L. a) N O a) Ira O - 0 = •0 V1 a 0 a) = a) "o a) " O C C N — o a E en a- 0)-- N O ° .m° co .? o a) L 0 Cu ' R Q ° co (? U O L r U — L N 3 — a) _ N Z ai a) « 2 " n a) a L 0 �0 O U dE CrQa) D1mm3 (nL � lEo °- t `) a .c—c cE 0 u) vcNCTCmaY • 0 E J � -OD NLVI c0 -Fn +@.rte U � d N U d ° U N 0 . OLL co O __ a) o m CL 0)_ o - m m -- CD 0 E 0 o (�j °a o O. Cr) rn� N o aa)i — o C ud v Qc of ° N • � � • n) E . rn > > > � . > � � om mE . c mE omoLCC ° Ec (nr CL a) 20 2 L m voiv-i a)i co co a)i I E E o � a> ° .CC C o L a) •- 0.1 a E a`l L. 0 CL" 0 0 0 0 a E F ° cu o c0 v E 0 u. E o co co D -o E I- -a ° O a) o f .E ° cur u) a_c -o ° -o .(L) 0 a 13 & C- 99 0 f.) c O 10 w a • co O• 0 U I c c O O (n Z N N N N 0 m a 'c O C E o i. .. 0 •Oct • > O _ c O Y 'O o O U — w i 0 ❑ ❑ E > U U U 0 Co Co Co Co C C C C co ca m m c a a n n .l- O o 0 0 O o 0 c- co aa) aa)i m m E'd_ aa)) aa)) aa)) F > CC CC CC EC 0) > C O N 'L c N r c Cr O 5 u• - m m CO CO L.0 0) a) c lc O c C c O O O.5 O " ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ re 4:2 a d d CL N C CO 1O T Co CU 0 Co 0 -O "0 .0 0) Ca "0 0) O)-0 >., j,-O 0) a) O — N E a) 0 CO L -0 fa c a) C C C C a)) _ ° .o C C r O la 7 :> .- a _F o) 0 CoN C m 'E =o ° — m a) C0 -6 oL c E °� N M 'O 'O N 0 0 o `O 0 L -0 ci N 0 0 0 O N fi V) .T. O .c 0 U a O 0 0 O)'- an C C 42 C 0 0 a`> > N > (-) 0 a ,_ a.) a --; o � any o � 44. 3 � m 0 go � E ocrncU OL . L0 ., Ma o 'O 'NEfa O ° .o C ° as -a_c a °aa = Q co -° w Y 0 -5 .9. 15300° O) N 0 ° 0 d o Ol L C C C > 0 3 fa O 0 o cn C i_ L O a) p_ O a) c .G f0 -0 » a) O O C a) CD 0 d N 'O a) 0 = .N. 0 'U CO 0 7—CO 2 � 3 E L = c °)'.- C °' 0 E C c . w o 2 x) '0 E n Q aoomu domE —Oa » o .E �� oEo E ' o oc V)r.OO y N a— 0 O a) C U = o L c S N .N. ? a) 'X 'n L 0 E Co ..N_.. o-• -030 v_) .J Tc 3 co N -o is Co 1- O1a o E O. cd - O V) .� C a) E 0 a - ° � > ._ m '0 -c c ° 0 ° o c C c ao) C _ a) U m °- O• .0 CO C 'o O O -O C 0 'O O L 3 0 CO,_ >, — O E d V 0 Z u, > mwp �.@ 't � o @ ° = TE a. _ r 'C CU -°o oCJ o)= > E 0 c s U a 0.).0 B 2 c ` a) � o � � o E O L.. 00- 0-,O N a o �`- CC co 70 m o as • o > a) . 210° a) � -c00)m10 °- o) ° ° ur � c .a oc� an a rn .D ` . w e U — fr o w < E � o a o co o . m Cr-N- o- E c L : `m `o m o a o r E � o of o N O 07 2 O O c 0° > T O 'C > ° 0 C O Q1 c 0 a) ° E .L. C Y 0) d❑ C c CO co 0 C 0O 0 C -0 u) CNN0Oc ° TO UO 0 'O N c c °- O VOi 2 c a0 N �'N N N LO.. N (n °- _O N O N .LO. O)'O @ a y 0 N CU Y c C o a) ca U to O c E C C U p)v N ° d O E O E (a y N .6 w ° 0 ° O mm o2 °) cmPEo .mE0>'� Ea) co02 a.� otwcmE.o (9 fnoo0 -0 007 0 C > C m N .0 O a)" 0 C N V N m 0 0 C 0 5 d co 0 N N a E V' U oc d O N ff) fT O N L L L a a, 0 0 0, E c )I) E - 4- 0 C a° W -o i E -0 c m ° m a ° I- a o m H co- m o-U Z fa . 0- H o B & C-100 a) se. R '�"�{- O O U . t rT#, w co 0 Z N ' pa M M M M M ha #r9 DDA c 'o O TJ V 5.f?ne O t ;-- ° °a °a ° ° a * > U ems', o « o 4-,-4,9 0 0 0 0 0 R ?xiz," CO N r N N N N - a) Vic_ > ) > > > > > CO >5 ii4 N c V _A 7 o0 OCr , CO 2 I m 0 0 0 0 0 Oa CO Pi a) ` uS o . N .-'S O 0 - co co 0 0 0 0❑ ❑ ❑ ❑03 ❑` a t a a a a a. -0 3 u a) P c o m V c d 3 R o -O d ¢ �'o u w .oc ° x'x m 3 .o „ w d o - � C N 0 .a? Cr C� acco 3 r c 0 c 4. 5Ot cm = o- R EoEW a) ° roR �. - N a � N 0 = m.w � N C N E Q3U a o 0 E R 3 a) O N O a) 3 'o U N L a) 5 O N N C p 0 p- O r E N C a O R N p O o ` V - N 2 _c E C a � c oOoo � c 2Ea� ° 3@ @ 20c c = E03c V _oa N '- rk Vl N O cn o > 2 f0 O -• .fir N a) O co En- E c N 0 6 -p co cI N 5 0 ` E .L-. 'O j@ U .0+ U .3 O N U N R d cc0 N ra o N E cn CD a) o .St ocEco °) U 2EU 5ma) c `0 0Cao) E a ocac p C ,art m� p NL.+ O a Q) a) � 2 a 0 d ' a c N o' E O R U dR ' om EL_ L oNL `o_ o � . wEE3 c°) OOE � c o. oo)0a) c oa) d Ra) _ —p 5aciN o0 Lw L � oa � 3 � a E .= � a) E � �� aowico >% 0E Z O a) last; N 1- -002 -00 N O c p N `p- � c �� c0 = .O N c O N O N c a - O L a O .>`+ a) O 'C N ._ co j 0 E N o O. C ` .o T0000 . —N c•E) .0 20 a-",. o0L' � nU EEo > � o a 1i .c maoo c me = V f6 a3 %Ua`.. 0 0 a) O C E V CD pa U N c E O D U 2 U p): E R0 Oc . 1 Na) a) Y rn 2U) o a) E,) Epc �' SEEc 'rn C IDO L � - aE E m m E o o U °N R c -0 =22 c a) 0 'o a) .� O p a) O a o p 0 N O c N a) y (n - c C c d O O a) ° a 0 a) 0 0 p .N. tq R E O N N >m : 4!(61 T c a) 0 a N C a) - U O o 0 N l l O O N m U U ca d a1 L.. f3"art @ o C > N L W 'U) 3 CO U — 'O L. a R a o N a O) a 'D a co o ¢ C0 EL 2 a 5= pal a) ` • E F c C 0 aci m am . 1.-x? B & C-101 iOrA Q • • • c E 0 0 • iU trued . c too O i34 (AZ V V V M co eyv ; . W iN}Ff" to : z C ° C • IA V 4 CD CO • • FA . .6 o G a a ., ; t w iry4 - •z ❑ ❑ ❑ ?7 E > a a a ❑ ❑ r.1Q ^pia! t t t •t t 5 a a 0 a a `' Ni. o d 2 2 2 2 r, c 0 O r 0 0 0 0 0 $ U C CT)w g N a) N N }� C�y E.d- aa) aa) as aa) aa) t- 5 0 it > } ❑ U p'.'4 C U N T. C • E c 0) ?^ �i a) C L Ti ��t� 0# C E O O RV O ., _❑ ❑ 0 a0 0 i ' z'.'; m a 2 a a. a a) O N C a) a) .0 L N W O O O O@ C fi_ C 0 m @ L U O .O ° L C E N N L ° C c L it' L@ C Tor .2 ,n 0>> . >,co " @ 3 ::. `@ : @ > vi my 0 . , m o C Of ° ° O` a @ a O .0 N 1 0 al .? > Z•-5 'N ,v2 @ ai 0 0 0 ❑ '� `O @CEO °.r. Eo w °� vv @ ° (n emu, 0 -0 ° C a) U1 .� (a co > >, O (a ° 0 ...'ECG O 2 U-0 0� mNE � ma � a° � = i am2mfow � � m '8 a) " •cCCD o mm = n5-°o c � 3 � ,E ° -gy m of � o °- ° 015 o -g U Q 0 aq`n 3 m c 0 � o `o 'E � ° a � a c ? ow E o ° a al 0 a) doh; >. 0 c u0i ai -° c al- mvn- o c ° Cu U E : � a mom aN@o moo ° aTL' La0o °c E2 ° c Ooca 0 ioZ'a; P- °' A;i^5 .3 o' auai 0 1° 0--°0 (n E i.� L L -0 E 0@ a-° m o f @ ` wa (0 _C) - E 5 m °- @ = @ E50 aE � ton ski ° o o c ° OY W .- 00On oc- t 30 .° asp '- E ° °a00 %cog as o0 Z mt @ ° ° � 00 .@ ° ° ° CO ,-.9 "Ca) -- C ° a ° 0 ° a � 0 ° E ° = o 0 o v ,� t a � 0 � u 0 O o f@ N .L. t@ O E C 0 3 U@ @ > .L°-. a) C @ C 'O @ ` a ^rr:', a) C "0 ° Ol co a) 0a ° ° v 0oEZ d -O _ aca0 ' c ° E Er °' ty*K .0 ald 2 7 V O 0 .m 'j ° a N (d N U1 ° (a @ U) a7 W ..0 t c@ C O co N E t'iN4 - N o 1 N m Q O U N V o N E a.c E N a a 0 .0 co -O 0 T.500 0 ,'°O @ a o co olw `iin.3 f6 >.❑ 0 • � c o0 -_ @ai @oa) @ @ - U =O. 0 -0s_ 2 - cod @0 �'a wm.� � c ° c a. ° ._. ai E ° c n@ -° 1° r rn o( ` U !I E 0; NvCJ E a 19 a j 0 U = a 0 C N �,C 'a ° ! N 0 f C o J 0 9 .N 2 U CL 0 co a,9 - >,N 0 U '= y o a 3 < a) E �0 co 0 a- w' CD 0 n. -° @ O Ca O o •7°F (n 1:3> ,„ C - > c 0 o U n 0, ° _ L_ .- 2 FA � w ° -5 U a (n m E @ ° ° • �1., • B & C-102 41' Ne t2 io; w 1O ;ti • u) a 0 0 � � Iry co Z V' V .1. ;,,f N N SSNe '';,1,. to To :- s(y w 0 tut,: 0 .... z ,liSL > ❑ ; x; w Ci O O W.:,1 vm Wa, O o ('...,,,(1 'v1 Z+ 0 car, ci; a .6-4T a cv ;? 0 En o % � o °o - o . _ ; CO o 2 me o, 2 f ?;"..i.41, a3 o • m a C t m D F > m p ° p o re Ca >, iw_ c v it` , �$r N .O N �xF ILI � • r '▪ - 'i t! 5 0 0 0 L,,,,,,..- IL ; CL ▪ ' tn O O I . O ` O k m a, 0 sr m CC W Co m m @ = 'O (A -O C O F DO) 0_ a, ?A` c T 0) O 0o cc co ( ,Y., nag@ ° a, � :+°,.g � om � 'cE d _ a, 0)aoE c .w m20 °`'h `° aa, me " an, Urn u,• ® m E w E Ic Q m ;:....;.e: m � o2 `O = �Y 0 < 0o rl• ^ -0m ° ° `. w E >O -mom 0 . a) f0 0 n 0 d > > I t n c •C O) N O T n n a a) O nob o T:. 0 ✓,(x o . a, _ E U .r-,;: c m >m U n E U -c 44N t = -o L > 0 r U OI a t4 -o C U7 ;;,f..�. U n C ° C m j- 0 ,, ___ ,_ s .j (n N U N In d a 0 c -o O o E .v D .. � m > °- mEv°, noo :-== '� o ,., mani r; t,; a, E: aC °) m� — Y -w,, 3U 0- m o n c. mm ° nT �L`. O � o To -= -o 2. a) �a > it▪ a0 � w -= OO aOOE ° : i, T -,313, C , m E O O O -O C C) o N C '0 -C >to co O N °' C C 2S O O O N OI -11 ,> > CO .V, N n a) O E N T N to L,01 0 5 — D) O" cr.e' 0)m .- al C d C to c O V N N U E O S N C CO D (0 'N :(0 N 0 U N d (_/, �`>"1 ° 4. O 4: X to � ag0 'Eavo o = EE € =u, -o � N � N � ?->? U cinvu ° Uas to c ? a) '0 = (0 a) a, >} '0 -0 m Vi 'e..cl. 0 O ,O E • mm oa or o v= E `o c -0 m ,_ ° mw aEc nXa, (n (n ?cz om '� � mEyd T#F— 0 O rucro a, w„�'.. a) to c 0 a, O N O);a) 0 c U O) U m L_ Ia, eN'- O .e O a) O) O O -0 ` co C b O 0 0 co N (6 a, E a) N .g N L f0 ca L CO -00 a, T_. if) To a7 0 .c O li u°i aEi `o >. C� (°n" U � mE xt HU ah E � � w , ( 0_ co UU B & C-103 0 . U C O Si 6, c • 0 0 0 c C ` R O V V � V !n Z N N N N • tom) N R w -0 c a) C t o L Y O R > 0 W w O . U O O 0 O > a a 0 a Q co CO CO U) CO C C = C C (0 o CO CO CO a 0. O. O. d w O a C O — O O O O O 'N 0 C N 0N N N N 0 a a "> c d E ' > N h >- ft ct it d' CC a) 07 > Co •` C N O d • = 7 0 0 0 0 �.-. p Cr U U 0 U W O ti m m m m 0 O) w C O N =' C C O O • a2 2' w m m m 0 m C a) O` C ° L C O - 'o U .0 E ac) a`) N c O 0 c 0 0 c 0 '0 co c 0 C N "0 U o > rr- N . U N > O (0 O 00 ,-, 0001— = C - 0 §. . CD r ° w w -o ° a °_._. u a) °_N 7) = O U N -O a) 0 CO L ° p` n d N C oO L .0 N co a .0 O_5 L U O_ O O. U F d 0) ° a) N d ° L .° a) c ... O d N O N c ° E o C. 2. 0 o ED o o ° m R ° E � a a c 0 °- a 0 ° 0 . O a) r r a ° N rn t N O ° ° _0 d 0 N N d U ° C c0 N• O ° r Cr) U) O a) U O L a) 0 m c 0 — c C O C d'"' "' c N c d 3 .� Ul D 0. U) 0 m >. ° a) 0- CO >.0 a) d n� ° E ° a, mEa` o ° ° cu m0CE Occco ."ca'. occoc aac c -' - E �cccoD '-' a" ° o ° N � c `-°2ux Ya > 2ax) ° D E ° ° o c a c 4- Lm) o ,oi'ac � ° co >. ioma) EEE `) vY � c0.) 0 , � E ° � o � ° E E o w E ao .EU E 4 aa)) � m m m@ .2 /0 � E 2E -43 X acr, (0 LX Z m a) D C m e u cp E "-- ° ° E 0 >, ` c0 E O 00 D c2 ° O .No2oE -. NEE = o °c =ta) -O - caw '= E .— E 3 0 O` -8 .-N N O co C .� N N O > ,U) O d N N L c) ° .c _c ° C Y UrQ co .1 . w ° 0x '— ° ` co a0 ` a) oo) ° N = U) 'Y CO {0 c 0 co O a. O .? U) N -0 N C C O 0 c p N r O L 0 ? p 4- CD o CO c C O E �• " c0)iacCOI ° ma '1o ' � 0 0000 0 > 0m 0C7 � ? aa) 0- O a) O C r. c0 O1 E 0).� a) C -O ° U Ol O)— U N -° > N d p_ ° > N d N °0++ O N .-. C O) C C a) N a) O .a). N N w C Y E a) CO YO o N a) CO 0 O CO n1 a) U d -2 C 3@ a C _° w C 0)r N C O)._ a) -0 > O U C -O > Y - C .,, a Ili N '� V O C"- = L « C -E U .m .` N N > a) 0 0 ._ N '- ._o EE < rao � o)° oE < cm ° 3 0w5 . Oc°) m `0_ _c F � a° -0` B & C-104 16 Y3 XI; E "` • 00a , O 0 v u) Z N N N -. ' N c F 5. -o C y x W C 0 co 7 O {dpi w C 0 0 NW t w y U U U )$.5 2 > a a > ? o C ti c u7 co C c ; _ a7 5 d w o ° a Q Oq_a ° cw a) aa) - 5 _ c > W W tr, c v e .` _ o a « = o 0 0 w o •o U U az 0 U m )i m m m frti, m ;s rft- m = II N C C T..' 1., O O 1 h EL 2 :333T 0 re )° 0 0 0 a s — O N m - O = a) •o O W T C V) — x. W L 5 L O O W O O C (a a) O C 5 W c .c O_ C E Y) W E i W L L `• 4? O L a) O as a, fa W W O U) ^5"'°- U) V! `O >.)-0 U! > O U) N a C E J c > d m C ;biz, ul— a E -0 c W N W@ U m c a N N d 5 W ° ° U' W N L L o -a. m L L '5 o o � m � ° � W � � SJ >2a) E Eom aL0 CO 'a a ` I- 0- 0 .0 O r O - O m W (� E o.,.. ur Li) O W �- .i W > .> OU 0NV _ 'N > 5 > ° D_00W ca 0 W 'L-' ❑ a) 0- Y n -CI 0 a) 5 u > J — D mZ Z 1-VI v E o c �r � m °) a2g £ `o_ c3E1-S ° > az ° EE >a) E W ? t CG 0- D a . m E N co- N^L ° F y o ur O-a' W ?° 0 > 7 4) `' m Co 5 C 6 J O �6 C L ' d y Z Y C y c V) W ='.' T 0 W .) 0)J `O N `O co L E O 2 a W O O � O O E E .O L W 'C r A a, :r 5 0 0 N v 2 W a) __ o 2 _c W C T m W W in > a J t G E 3 W L "O C C L O 0. fa >> O co L 'O U) W illii- a) L.. C _ - W W a1 O _ > m O N c O C T D W ,.- = W f=;p i'. O _ O T33 - m rr- - ° cc voJO . o fm Yom;` aa)ia> oE " - O _a _ - _ W L- Z W ' 2 Z in EO oCyrc bo • c +<v -WO " o m mcia `oo '- cC00 N C L 1p a) C ` O_ C m a a /9 J o " O 2 ° � 0 0 15 0 € N ` ° 2 Eo u E > v@ a -0 caa 0 - m0, O W � c W m m0L O - j J � �mu) c = u a -o aa)i -0 � c5 a., 2 ° - W - ? x o a) s W o 0 - ,-" m - .2)3 5 N a? V o O ° Na °- N N 'C ° Q 0m a) -o -5 a) 2L cC C ° OE c -z co D_ 1c ;} N -C WCm d CO J C m C W E N .J W ._ 5 — 0 W W - r� W L.+ W a C v) al 5 W a) W J 5 C c U C .- C ;, O ,.. Y J m W W Q •... J L C ° J W E 5 a) L - O „, --3:- (2 . O t.' S d ,_ W O -o U) `. 5 C J .. O. m N V) C FI. O -0 O -o _ C am∎ o -0W c N O -OE � cOC - 5a) �� W .. p0 W, to 'o. 3 -0 O 0C 5 C a) W N E 5 - ° 2 _ 2W X a — O C m J ° -O 0 m J O O W W O W IC C N O N ° W 3 r0 •- T' O � a) > E -- Rom —` o c E. .0 .`) 12 ` -O L 5 _d u) E E :-. - W W ._ L C O ._ — N-35 rn a C A 2 E N a) 'C 5 E `O f W W W C C 'o 0 O O_L g C a) r a C __ C }N). O C L S -O .F N O .� W C W _ > 0 =- -0 J W W W 0 W J '- 0_._ - ._ O W L W J O -'01 O J L C ._• E 3OED a WrE20_ aa, d -o u, � O_ ° KU d530VCC o � mU yZ a. 0 )n a, SE B & C-105 a) 0 O ( .1‘ co • CE O 0 7-1'� U fn Z N N V V Q I N 'O C a) C c_ y V O 0 0 > D C O o V 0 O 0 L c 0 '.0 U 6 2 > a U 0 C N C C O) C C C O w 0 C O O O j . U O w 0 U O U U CD 2:7 30 2 3 0) 2 o) 2 0>�2, C iC 0 w to a) C y C N C to•of N Ca 0 O p O 0 O O 1F->- W' a U cc O o O o t o C)Co U N Z C r • E e y- O 0 E a) U r 22It m m 0 0 0 r CD O C P o y « C C O 0 a5 • a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 a) a) a) �j N a) N aj T C N C C > ,Z` > a) 0 ' ` O a O C in Y >, ` o c E N �_ O p O U5 CD co". .7_ d c E ° c � o 1" O - a) Ea) o ' c � o c m .0 a L E N a) a) Y >` N 3 0a N W 3 f0 _T O N N N � � m Lvov L> ao � x _• Q E a) .E o 0 � a L co o _ L C CD _ O a) 3 N C O o > o w l y fin a)) o ° w E O c o .0 c � o m a'Cpp a) poa )o cu - m o _ L N a d L 2 Ca N Ca N C o c o Ct ° C C a y a C O Cn tT U E U N . a) 3N EaEo aE ° 713— Oa- m . � 0 .Eaxi �) 3 C -. EoN 0. 0- ... ai a) a) '5 =ct o Li). O a) a 0 N co @ f0 E N 0 ! .0 C o m L > _> 0 a) a) L a) a) _ _ _ @ a N 0 L 0 = .V o OM T a) 0 u) a 0 0 L0, d N 0 a. S) jn 0 0 .o Ca 0 ._ C C C N C C o CO _ N C Z (9 C f0 O C@ O O O N N C E L a) n ._ a O 2 3 .o L'• Y m w E .m t -o .J 'o E ° ur c )n c 'c ° o o 0 o n O N C — L O 'O a O N C N C N f0 O _ Z 0 0 tn 0 o c o c c ai °) m 0)-0 0 ,- o)° c c°)� o `- .o-. ° o a ma O E C Ca 0 o C O C a) L .0 r m — 0 . Cn Y N 0" ft — N C 2 O N `� ea ti Ct E >. Ca .O 6 co :O O N C N Ca O a) O a) N• U la a) (a d N ,N E °-) N O) a"O 0 0 ON c C L.+ 1- > = U_ O o a) Q L L ' a) C c Ca o 'n -4, co CU = rn a.� w E > O °O ca a ° cv a`) E c �L°)., o Y O L o L d o • w CO C O •W 0- W - 10 N 0 � � 0 O O 'o � L 0)".' O a) O O d U m a) ° C a) L N O U O)L U " r > > a) °O. N V 'O 'O N 'NO •- 1] w E a L.. L r O O N CT r 2 ° C (a 2 0 C a) (n O' d O CD o C6 C N O N to a) Ca O)H a c a a) a) o a ` "O 0 'O O V 0 a) a) - O V m "O v 'o 0. O N L C C C C a E r —O 'Q' x Lr � L E o =° C m o m a° r o a a sv � _ �° '�,�° L V H m w W � -C .r ... ._ O L ._ c O 6 W H C O a w N o. )n ._ )n H co B & C-106 a) mr» ... C '! n✓ a > N fi C' "+mid'' o m a m .r g o o m° CO v l 9 m 3 l o w m o o 0 a u) Ail'0 C .,03 L L = C -6 2 a) C ).wL L L, Oa r > y >• 0 :Co, .- w en -- 1.0 (0 r- gwy. c CwZ N ms ro O O in .0 w C;r# ° a+ r 9 a) d • 7 Q UI m 0 co m _ . o a 0 o)2 `�C; 'u E C w C 7) R01 d U J •f. ] O U ° E y 3 0 606 d Q U a) "G w : a L C0 s�300aN N ?ID, F • p d N lo 5LL 0 g!' c r ar a o %V p o .a '�. mot > o 2 a .7)C C O 2 c O O 0 id.., d o <j o a s m LL. Z o 5 m d `2 O tc" mo = E c Q: w d jC; W F o' o m C '@0 O p 0 - a :*a < O O O W CD m >- v0) a a) O) y0 3 a N c) o o C -kil; LL a v c > C a O msv.} c C — 2 r a) a) x O - i g rn o O C .. O 'O a) N C '= S N @ O T� a) a) .c X O co >.'- _ _ C 0 ,---ft: m c _ c O N >.9 N _ a' O �-4�.' b c °) 0 @ = J '0 Z 'O @ O N 0) @ la k� 4i a) rn ° c a) O @ C a) 0 O C ' " L a) 24;4 E N v °1 C cn N C O 5 -0 U @ z+C.. 9 w U w m = 0 Com¢ oinw2oo C 8 ° o m ° a) m Q 0 v x c .o v N ID; 'u c N = 'N O@ .O -0 U b@ V •X Y'd t. O c O m ° • YCOco o o @ o m y ,a E ;' .i my t d tarn d ` = CO C ,.. O_V) O.y .O-. ,gn- Q . p . o_ . E" E `a =ad ., 00 Y 're' vavm0LL 2r . ct @aU � e B & C-107 • froityk • 41- �yY City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Public Review Period Closes: May 25, 2011 Project Name: Project Applicant: Mike Harrison, Director Operations and Planning Chaffey Joint Union High School District Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Project Description: A proposal to subdivide four (4) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. Related files: Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. • FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • May 25, 2011 B & C-108 • RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 TO SUBDIVIDE FOUR (4)VACANT PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF ABOUT 53 ACRES INTO 76 LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, ABOUT 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY (SR-210); AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, AND -20. • A. Recitals. 1. Chaffey Joint Union High School District (Chaffey JUHSD), filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the .25th day of May 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and.concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 25, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant project site located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210); and b. The project area consists of multiple parcels with a combined area of about 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 2,500 feet (east to west) by about 940 feet (north to south); and c. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is vacant property that was recently subdivided into 56 lots and is currently being graded for pending construction of homes(Related file: Tract 17651). To the west are additional single-family residences and a single vacant parcel. To the south is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their • facilities further to the east. Beyond this road is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east are vacant parcels; and B & C-109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 • Page 2 d. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and e. The proposal is to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development. Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves; and • f. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet,which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet, which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required; and g. This application is in conjunction with Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property consisting of multiple parcels with a combined • area of about 2,350,000 square feet(53 acres)into 76 lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for the proposed noise attenuation walls along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height. The applicant has submitted a Variance request for consideration by the Planning Commission. The proposed development, otherwise, meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports.included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local • CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the B & C-110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • May 25, 2011 Page 3 imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings • upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a project site consisting of multiple parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres) and with overall dimensions of approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by about 940 feet (north to south) located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Very Low (VL) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3) Approval of this request includes the removal of multiple trees per Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. New trees shall be planted • according to the requirements/guidelines specified in Section 5.41.501 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The new windrows shall be planted in the areas as shown in Exhibit G of the Staff Report. • B & C-111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 • Page 4 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Terra Vista Community Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim improvements (for example, drainage) as deemed necessary by the City. 6) Prior to construction, all future homes and associated improvements shall require the review and approval by the City and the issuance of applicable building permits by the Building and Safety Department. The site plotting and architecture of these homes (and accessory structures) shall require the review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to Planning Commission action. 7) All setback lines shall be shown on the Final Map. 8) Preserve in-place, where feasible, existing trees that will be within the alignment of the new Community Trail subject to review and approval of the Engineering Department. • 9) Equestrian uses and improvements shall be in accordance with the • standards and requirements applicable to the properties within the Equestrian Overlay as described in Development Code Section 17.08 and the Trail Implementation Master Plan. 10) Enlarge the corner cut-offs at the intersection of the north to south and the east to west trails at Lots 15 and 16 so that they are 20 feet by 20 feet (instead of 10 feet by 10 feet). 11) Provide missing corner cut-off at the right-angle turn of the trail, located at Lot 17. 12) Drainage concrete V ditches shall be no more than 6 inches deep and a minimum of 5 feet wide with a medium broom finish. 13) The walls located at the rear of each lot and adjacent to the equestrian trails shall be comprised of a 2-foot high solid lower portion constructed of decorative blocks and a 4-foot high open upper portion constructed of rod iron fencing. The fence pickets shall have a maximum spacing of 2 inches. Final design and construction details including materials shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director. 14) Provide PVC trail fencing at the south side of Lot 76. 15) Increase the width of the trail entrance at Lots 17 and 76 to facilitate vehicle access. • 16) Provide striping in the street and signage at all horse trail crossings. B & C-112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • May 25, 2011 Page 5 • 17) Reduce the length, and eliminate interim turnarounds of the east to west trail segments behind Lots 1 and 16. 18) Provide trail signage for the Community Trail at all trail intersections per City standards. 19) The noise attenuation wall along the south perimeter of the subdivision, parallel to the Foothill Freeway (SR-210), shall be constructed per Caltrans standard. 20) The wall along the west perimeter of the subdivision, parallel to East Avenue shall be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 21) A neighborhood entry incorporating special landscape and design treatment per Figure 5-10 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan shall be provided at the southwest corner of the project site, near the northeast corner of the East Avenue overpass and the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). 22) All trail surfacing shall be of decomposed granite with 4-inch minimum base. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. The • decomposed granite shall be the complete width of the trail up to the property boundary. 23) Provide City Standard "Unauthorized Vehicles Prohibited" signs at each street trail connection. The minimum dimension between the wood posts for a step through detail is 18 inches clear minimum between posts and maximum 14 inches above grade. 24) A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control in accordance with City Master Trail drawings shall be submitted for City Trails Coordinator review and • approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and Grading Plans. The developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 25) If phasing is proposed, a separate phasing plan shall have to be submitted and reviewed by all Technical Review Committees and the Planning Commission. Additional conditions and plans may be required as determined during the Phasing Plan processing. • Building and Safety (Grading) Department 1) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and • retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. B & C-113 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH. SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 • Page 6 • 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall • provide hard-lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3) Prior to removing fences or walls, along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines, the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. • 4) All cross-lot drainage easements shall be concrete per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. 5) The rough grading and precise grading plans shall include an exhibit showing the locations of all Water Quality Management Plan Best Management Practices (BMPs). 6) All equestrian trails shall be constructed with a 2 percent cross-slope draining to a concrete swale. • 7) In the equestrian trails water bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Water Bar Interval • Spacing 4%.to 5.99% 50-feet 6% to 8.99% 40-feet 9% to 11.99% 30-feet 12% and greater 20-feet 8) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a master private sewage disposal (septic) system plan for the entire project and each lot. 9) All proposed private sewage disposal (septic) systems shall be located in the front yard of each lot to allow for future connections to public sanitary sewer system located within the public street(s). 10) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the Water Quality Management Plan, the applicant shall provide a waste discharge identification number(WDID)on the title sheet of the grading and drainage plan. 11) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall record a copy • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan." B & C-114 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • May 25, 2011 • Page 7 Engineering Department 1) East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" standards as required including: a) Curb'and gutter, asphalt pavement, 5-foot sidewalk, and ADA access ramps. b) Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, shall be of a species and spaced per the street tree table in the Standard Conditions. Install street trees per the Landscape Maintenance District(LMD) plans, rather than street improvement plans. c) No residential driveways to East Avenue. d) 'Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. e) Provide R26(S), "No Stopping" signs along frontage. • f) Provide 9500 lumen HPSV street lights. g) Relocate the existing catch basin north of"A" Street. • h) Provide gated access for City maintenance vehicles to the interior Community Trail per City Standard 1006-A including the drive approach. All concrete that crosses the trails shall be medium broom finish. 2) Install Landscape Maintenance District improvements along the project frontage on East Avenue. a) East Avenue improvements shall conform to Figures 5-28 and Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Provide a 30-inch • rock wall at the back of the sidewalk wherever perimeter walls jog 10 feet behind the sidewalk. The minimum sidewalk width adjacent to the walls shall be 5 feet. • b) Provide a concrete header to clearly delineate where public maintenance ends and private homeowner maintenance begins. • c) A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval. The perimeter landscaped parkways shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. d) Dedicate Lots C and D to the City for public landscape purposes. • 3) Process an application to vacate the extra tapered right-of-way along the frontage of East Avenue at Lots 1 and 76. B & C-115 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT.MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 8 • 4) When perimeter walls turn the corner onto"A" Street, a landscape strip should still be provided between the wall and the sidewalk on the corner side yards of Lots 1 and 76. Provide at least 5 feet if the trees will be planted there. The corner side yards will be maintained by the homeowners. 5) Community trails shall also be annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. • a) Community Trail on the north property line of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70 and 71 shall be installed per Standard Drawing 1004, in a separate Lot A dedicated to the City. Access to East Avenue shall be per East Avenue conditions above. • b) Community Trail on the north property line of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35 and 46 shall be installed per Standard Drawing 1002-A. If Tract 17651 precedes this project, the trail will be partially installed (12 of 20 feet) and require reconstruction by this developer. If Tract 17651 follows this project, the trail shall be installed full width along portions of the off-site street required for secondary • access. Install a minimum of 12 feet width outside the perimeter wall with storm runoff protection for portions without a street adjacent. c) Drainage facilities shall protect Community trails from runoff. • (Adjacent streets can serve that purpose also.) Provisions shall be made for potential excessive siltation of public storm drains from such drainage facilities. d) Install "pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1007-B) at intersections between local and community trails. Install"Vehicle Gate with pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1006-A) at intersections between streets and Community trails. If directed by the Planning Director, provide "Vehicle Gate with pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1006-B or -C) at intersections between streets and local trails. e) Parkway community trails can be shown on street improvement plans. Include a trail plan for the interior Community Trail with the East Avenue LMD plans. 6) Revise Drawing 2219, prepared for Tract 17651, to include full width parkway Community Trail on the south side of Gypsum Drive. 7) All internal streets to be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including: a) • Local Streets per the Etiwanda Specific Plan shall have a 60-foot • right-of-way with sidewalks on both sides. B & C-116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • May 25, 2011 Page 9 b) Local Rural Streets per the Etiwanda Specific Plan allow for a 55-foot right-of-way with a sidewalk on one side only. Local Rural Streets are appropriate for cul-de-sacs. Sidewalk shall end at a drive approach. c) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, street pavement, curbside drain outlets, and ADA access ramps. d) Provide cross gutters across Street "A" at Street "B" and across Street "F" at Street "G," only. All remaining intersections, • including those at East Avenue and at Gypsum Drive, shall have adjacent catch basins intercepting the gutter runoff. e) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights. f) Provide traffic striping and signage including"All-Way Stop"signs at the intersections of"A" Street with "D" Street and "F" Street. g) Provide street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, of a species and spaced per the Street Tree Table in the Standard Conditions. • 8) It is City Council policy that no tract shall have lots more than 600 feet from two means of access. Therefore, the streets of Tentative Tract 17651 connecting to Banyan Street must be completed before building permits can be issued for the bulk of these lots. Streets can be • constructed by the Tract 17651 developer or by you. a) After Tract Map 17651 records, public right-of-way will be available for the Banyan-connecting streets. Prior to recordation, it will be necessary to add area to the Official Record 2008-0551081 easement in order to construct a temporary road, with a 26-foot minimum pavement width. Only ultimate permanent street improvements are eligible for developer-to-developer reimbursement. b) You may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost for ultimate permanent off-site improvements from future development. If you fail to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights to reimbursement shall terminate. 9) Temporary fencing at the ends of streets stubbed for future extension shall extend beyond the street right-of-way, to the perimeter wall corners on side yards or building setback lines on the front yards. 10) Master Plan Storm Drains for Area 5 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy are already in place. No reimbursement is • applicable to this Master Plan Storm Drain. The developer is responsible for reimbursing his fair share of the costs for Tract 17651 constructing local storm drains to the Victoria Basin Master Plan Storm Drain System. B & C-117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 10 • a) If Tract 17651 storm drains do not precede the subject tract, this developer shall install sufficient portions of Drawing 2219-D to serve the development and protect the project from off site flows. The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by development with no fee credit; however, you may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over-sizing costs from future development within the same tributary area. If you fail to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all your rights to reimbursement shall terminate. 11) The cost of additional local storm drains connecting to the Victoria Basin Master Plan Storm Drain System shall be borne by the development with no fee credit or developer-to-developer reimbursement. • a) Only closed system storm drains shall be constructed—once in a pipe, flows shall remain in pipes until discharging into concrete. channels. b) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle two times Q1oo. c) All storm drains in Street A shall be designed for Q1oo • d) Extend the local storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain 025 within tops of curbs, Q100 within rights-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q1o. e) Dedicate a 25-foot wide public storm drain easement on the final Tract Map when the diameter of the pipe is 60 inches or greater, otherwise easement shall be 12 feet wide. 12) All interior street runoff is to be collected by the local storm drain system. 13) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone "D" designation on the east side of the project area changed to "Shaded X." The developer shall fulfill the requirements of FEMA's Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) dated 16 June 2006, so that the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) can be issued. The LOMR shall be issued prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 14) Vehicular access to private local trails shall be from local streets only. a) Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be used. Where • a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris B & C-118 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • May 25, 2011 Page 11 • onto the sidewalk/street. Provide curbside drain outlets for adjacent drainage devices. b) Where private cross lot drainage facilities discharge to public streets, inlets to curbside drain outlets or public storm drains shall be designed to function (not become blocked) in the absence of regular maintenance. Show the private inlets on the public improvement plans for reference. 15) The driveway on Lot 1 shall be located as far as possible from the East Avenue intersection curb return. The corner side yard walls and slopes shall not encroach.on the intersection line-of-sight. 16) The existing overhead utilities' (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage as follows. a) Overhead utilities on the project side of East Avenue, extending to the first poles off-site (north and south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time. • b) Overhead utilities on the project side of the 1-210 Freeway(along FCD access road to San Sevaine basin outlet), extending to the first poles off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. c) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. d) Provide a separate 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch drawing of the existing utility poles per Section B of the "Existing Overhead Utility Requirements" Engineering Department handout along with the reimbursement agreement application. 17) Site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). The Rough grading plan showing all slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be approved prior to final map approval. 18) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the • issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. B & C-119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 • Page 12 • Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide • evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District . (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and'coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. • • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 • requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. B & C-120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • May 25, 2011 Page 13 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM10)emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. • 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. • 12) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) The applicant shall purchase at a 1:1 ratio 2.9 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub RAFSS habitat designated for conservation or pay in-lieu fees. Evidence of applicable mitigation agreements approved by CDFG shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of grading permits. 2) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the • presence/absence of this species following protocols established by the United States Fish and Wild Life Services (USFWS) prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that SBKR is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and B & C-121 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 14 • implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA (or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the purchase/conservation of off-site suitable habitat that is known to support SBKR at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 3) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the presence/absence of this species following protocols established by the USFWS prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that CAGN is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall • be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA(or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the the timing of construction activities outside of the breeding season (February 15 to August 31) and/or purchase/conservation of off-site suitable habitat that is known to support CAGN at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of • applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 4) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided by an appropriate buffer, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction • survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 5) The applicant shall prepare a mitigation plan containing provisions requiring the transplantation and/or seeding of Plummer's mariposa lily plants to an off-site protected area suitable for supporting Plummer's mariposa lily. The number of transplantings/seeding shall be equal or greater than the 175 plants existing on the property. This mitigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits and shall be done in coordination with the CDFG. • • 6) Necessary permits from the relevant regulatory agencies (CDFG, RWQCB) must be obtained for impacts to jurisdictional features and/or B & C-122 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • • May 25, 2011 Page 15 waters. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide evidence of applicable permits to the City. 7) Trees that are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a matching species of a minimum 15-gallon size. 8) Tree planting shall follow the requirements established in the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • • Consider, establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special • • qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the areas archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • B & C-123 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 • Page 16 • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert • construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or replanted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,0 emissions associated with • vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize FMB) emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code (CBC), which includes building standards for the Wildand-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) • that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. B & C-124 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122— CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • May 25, 2011 Page 17 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from • the site. • 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared on October 20, 2008 by the applicant's representative to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by the applicant's representative on October 20, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, . including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. . 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural • measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. B & C-125 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122—CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 • Page 18 . 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of • the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise ' 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) The applicant shall construct a block wall noise barrier along the south, east, and west perimeters of the project site. The height and location of these walls shall be per Exhibit 7 of the Preliminary Noise Assessment. 3) When an application for the development of homes on the project site • is submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any • time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation B & C-126 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-22 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT • May 25, 2011 Page 19 plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the • Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • B & C-127 iiipfli COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • 44 DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTT18122 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL LOCATION: FREEWAY (SR-210)—APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, AND -20. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: wGeneral Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-22, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,094.00 X B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a / /_ complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date • of the approval. SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf R%t\ UB 288122StdCond 5-25.doc Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date C. Site Development • 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. • 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be• submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. • 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ • located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements and the submitted fence/wall plan approved with this Tract Map. a. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a / /_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official b. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at /_/_ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions(CC&Rs)shall not prohibit the keeping the equine _/_/_ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. • • 2 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res &Sff Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-129 Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ • owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape • maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department • review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all /_/_ lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 13. Construct decorative block walls between homes(i.e.,along interior side and rear property lines). _/_/_ 14. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC within steel frames. 15. Return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/ /_ 16. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 17. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products. Environmental 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation _/_/_ measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the / /_ issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate,verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of _/_/_ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit,or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These.funds may be used by the City to retain 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res &Sff Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-130 Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be • considered grounds for forfeit. E. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/ /_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: —/—/— a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; • d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors; panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics,underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(SUBTT18122)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to /_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. —/ / 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can / /_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. • 4 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-131 • Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date • Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(SUBTT18122). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances,and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition,the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. For projects using septic tank facilities,. written certification of acceptability, including all _/_/_ supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday . / /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. H. New Structures • 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / /_ I. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading / /_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / /_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for / /_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res &Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc • B & C-132 Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date J. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(GRADING) • (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • SEE ATTACHED K. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/—/- community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. • 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from —/_/- street centerline): 44 total feet on East Avenue /—/ 38 total feet on Gypsum Drive —/—/— 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. —/—/- 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / /_ noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the /—/— • final map. M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos, landscaped _/ /_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010,no person shall make connections from a source / / of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. • 6 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-133 Project No. SUBTT18122 Completion Date 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / /_ • • Curb& AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other East Avenue X X X (e) X X Gypsum Drive X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement • reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e)for community trail only. • 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights /_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. • b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction /_/_ • project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200 .feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope'or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City /_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan / /_ check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/ /_ accordance with the City's street tree program. • 7 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-134 • Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed _/_/_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street •. improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction • legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. East Avenue Magnolia NCN 8' 30' 15 Gal Fill Foreground tree grandiflora O.C. in • 'D.D. Blanchard Background tree Geijera parviflora Austrailian Willow 5' 20' 15 Gal Fill in larger planters O.C. in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project • intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be _/_/_ submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways,medians,paseos,easements,trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: East Avenue, community trails 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas(40%)of mortared cobble or _/_/_ other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 3. Install a connection to the Cucamonga Valley Water District — Inland Empire Utilities Agency recycled water line in East Avenue for use irrigating the public landscape area being constructed. 4. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 5. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the /_/_ developer until accepted by the City. • 8 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res &Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-135 • Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date 6. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ • Beautification Master Plan East Avenue theme wall. 0. Drainage and Flood Control 1. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone f— designation /_/_ removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone "X"designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas. 4. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/ /_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, _/ /_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. • 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/_/_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all _/ /_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed _/_/_ beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. • . 9 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-136 Project No.SUBTT18122 Completion Date 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if • at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 10 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-137 • City of Rancho Cucamonga f . Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 410 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 • 'rg GRADING COMMITTEE • PROJECT REPORT& RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: SUBTT18122 / DRC2006- Type: 76 lot residential subdivision 00793 Location: East side of East Avenue north of the 210 Freeway Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, & -20 Meeting Date: December 15, 2009 revised By: Matthew Addington on May 12, 2011 Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx . No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: December 15, 2009 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: May 25, 2011 By: Note: Building and Safety— Grading will review and comment on future submittals for • this project. • Note: See Sections B and C for revisions. A. STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage • plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and • submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports • shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. • C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLKCC\SUBTT18122 DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report 20091215 rev 20110512.doc 1 of 6 B--&—C-1 38 City of Rancho Cucamonga iSts At S Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the.City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. A Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review. A separate plan/permit for Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record: 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage • acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) & shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property, including lot side yards. 13. Private sewer, water and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, current adopted California Plumbing Code. 14. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100- feet beyond project boundary. 15. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. • C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLKCC\SUBTT18122 DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report 20091215 rev 20110512.doc 2 of 6 • B_LC-139 - -"a> City of Rancho Cucamonga s Building & Safety Department t10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 j T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 16. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 17. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre- grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: • 1) The bottom of the over-excavation 2) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building • permit; 3) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; 4) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. B. COMMENTS -The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1. Include a WQMP BMP exhibit with the conceptual grading and drainage plan. • 2. In all section views call out the minimum and maximum physical heights of the wall on C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLKCC\SUBTT18122 DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report.20091215 rev 20110512.doc 3 of 6 . . . 140 �J», City of Rancho Cucamonga 1T.. 4 Building & Safety Department my10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 both sides of the wall. In reviewing the elevations on the plans it appears that some walls maybe over 10-feet high and as high as 21-feet. 3. An updated Water Quality Management Plan must be submitted for review. 4. Pad elevations should be adjusted in elevation to allow for the 2% swale requirement in the current adopted California Building Code. 5. A discussion was held regarding the connection of the project to a public sewer in-lieu of private sewage disposal (septic) systems on each lot due to an existing sewer within 200-feet of the project site on East Avenue. Staff determined that the existing sewer is • on the high side of the project and the nearest sewer connection was over 200-feet away from the east side of the project. Therefore, construction of a public sewer system is not feasible at this time. As a sewer system may be available in the future when the private sewage disposal systems fail due to time and use, a condition of approval is made in Section C to require the proposed private sewage disposal systems to be constructed in the front yard to allow for connection to a future public sewer system in the street. • C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to • accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 2. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4. All cross lot drainage easements shall be concrete per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. 5. The rough grading and precise grading plans shall include an exhibit showing the • C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLKCC\SUBTr18122 DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report 20091215 rev 20110512.doc 4 of 6 B-81--C-141 ma City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. BM T:Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 locations of all water quality management plan best management practices (BMP's). 6. All equestrian trails shall be constructed with a 2% cross slope draining to a concrete swale. 7. In the equestrian trails water bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Water Bar Interval • Spacing 4% to 5.99% 50-feet 6% to 8.99% 40-feet 9% to 11.99% 30-feet 12% and greater 20-feet 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall submit a master private sewage disposal (septic) system plan for the entire project and each lot. • 9. All proposed private sewage disposal (septic) systems shall be locate in the front yard of each lot to allow for future connections to public sanitary sewer system located within the public street(s). 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the water quality management plan the applicant shall provide a waste discharge identification number (WDID) on the title sheet of the grading and drainage plan. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall record a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan". D. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. Maintenance of BMP's identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the project CC&R's. 2. The submitted Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) dated February 5, 2007 with a revision date of October 20, 2008 (the preparer of the document is not identified) was resubmitted for review was deemed substantially complete. Please note the document had the same dates. A spot check of some of the key issues in the document determined that the document did not appear to be revised. The comments below are the same comments from the previous submittal. The following items need to be completed: • aS6tatibiiia,,.Page . , „. . itei iV,."r :,Corry"ection;ltem .t a fp , efi • Cover Page If the document was prepared by an engineer, then the document C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLKCC\SUBTT18122 DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report 20091215 rev 20110512.doc 5 of 6 142 City of Rancho Cucamonga or ,% Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 al ...,.. .w,. s,�?: a R xG �. I r rAS I 2 _l ,ww y a + .m'SE /t:Eua ,�$ t u il '.� Sectton�;�...,�Page..ark?s��.�4 �`�� k„�,�� •�Correction'�Item , .�bitiz,��.,�.. _ ..�3.. � . must be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. The City of Rancho Cucamonga considers this the final document. Section 1.1 A-5 Provide contact name or position Section 1.2 A-5 Provide permit numbers [List DRC#, PMT# and WDID#] prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Section 2.1 A-6 In the "Pollutant of Concern Summary Table” provide the name of the receiving water body. Section 2.2 A-8 Change 1.B to a "no" checkbox. Section 2.2 A-8 If 1.B is a yes provide the hydrologic analysis. Section 3.2 A-17 Provide copy of educational materials that will be provided to Property Owners. Section 3.4.1 A-22 Provide BMP design calculations per the revised June 9, 2005 template. This is the final WQMP Section 3.4.1 A-23 Provide calculations and details concerning the Vegetated Swales. Section 4.1 A-23 Include a maintenance schedule for the proposed BMP's. Section 5 A-23 Provide the contact information for the entity which will maintain the project BMP's prior to the Homeowner's Association assuming responsibility. Section 6 A-24 Notarize and record the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan". Copies are available at the Building and Safety front counter. • Remove the certification provided in the WQMP submitted for review. Plan Review Locate the proposed BMP's on the conceptual grading and drainage plan. Attachment A-1 Remove this attachment. The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not use this attachment. Exhibit B Show the site location on the map / illustration. 3. The Water Quality Management Plan should be completed, approved and recorded prior to Planning Commission approval, and shall be completed, approved and recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. • C:\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Files\OLKCC\SUBTT18122 DRC2006-00793 Grading Committee Project Report 20091215 rev 20110512.doc 6 of 6 8._1 C-143 , =`,`roc „�4 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 4p 4 .h C,p_i. • .}'1 4:.,,� I 4 � Fire Construction Services u, STANDARD CONDITIONS July 23, 2009 Chaffey Joint Union HS District David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. SFR Subdivision in VHFHSZ 6375 East Ave. East Ave N/O 210 SUBTT18122 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the maximum distance between fire hydrants and the location of fire hydrants must be in accordance to the 2007 California Fire Code and the RCFPD Ordinance FD46. •FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project will be established in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire service plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems a. Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance FD46, the 2007 California Fire Code and the approved Fire Protection Plan require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be . installed in selected lots a s listed in the report. • FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads; streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the approved Fire Protection Plan for specifics on the access requirements. B & C-144 1. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre- • emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emptioh device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. f. Gates on perimeter walls must be solid and non-combustible except the main entrance gates per the Fire protection Plan. 2. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 3. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. - FSC-7 Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • 1. Fire Protection Plans (FPP): The developer shall comply with all the requirements of the approved Fire protection Plan for this subdivision. The FPP was designed and approved in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code Fire Area FS-3 as amended by RCFPD Ordinance FD46, RCFPD Standard 47-1, and the 2007 CBC Chapter 7A requirements apply to the development of the site, the construction of the buildings and the landscaping. These development codes provide standards regulating: a. Fire resistive roof assemblies b. Vegetation Management c. Fire District access roadways. d. Ignition resistant construction and protection of openings. e. Fire sprinkler systems f. Fire protection water supply & Fire flow criteria The approved fire protection plans (FPP) and documentation must be recorded with San Bernardino County prior to release of building permits. Proof of the recording must be provided to FCS. NOTE: The architectural drawings submitted to the building department for the construction of the homes shall reference the FPP and shall implement all the requirements of the FPP. The landscape plans when submitted to the planning department for review will be routed to FCS for plan review in compliance with approved FPP. Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. • b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. B & C-145 2 d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work permit must be obtained from • Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FSC-8 Chronological summary of VHFHSZ requirements Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the builder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project area. Approval is subject to an on-site inspection. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, All the required ignition resistant features including landscaping of the FPP shall be completed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and.the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. .Chronoloqical Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: • 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped., 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Fire Protection Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of the VHFHSZ requirements. 4. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 5. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. • PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services requirements. B & C-146 3 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire • hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 by Fire Construction Services. An annual Fire Code permit is required for the access control 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of • darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. The address signs shall be non combustible and in accordance with RCFPD Standards. 7. Fire Protection Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of the VHFHSZ requirements: • • B & C-147 • 4 • RESOLUTION NO. 11-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 TO ALLOW PERIMETER WALLS IN EXCESS OF 6 FEET, THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT PERMITTED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, FOR NOISE ATTENUATION PURPOSES ALONG THE PERIMETER OF A PROPOSED 76-LOT SUBDIVISION WITH A COMBINED AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 53 ACRES IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY (SR-210); AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: , 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, AND -20. A. Recitals. 1. Chaffey Joint Union High School District (Chaffey JUHSD), filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2009-00020 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of May 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 25, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224; and b. The application applies to a vacant project site located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210); and c. The project area consists of multiple parcels with a combined area of about 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 2,500 feet (east to west) by about 940 feet (north to south); and • d. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is vacant property that was recently B & C-148 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-23 • VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 2 subdivided into 56 lots and is currently being graded for pending construction of homes(Related file: Tract 17651). To the west are additional single-family residences and a single vacant parcel. To the south is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this road is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). To the east are vacant parcels; and e. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; and f. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow the construction of noise attenuating walls along the south, east, and west perimeters of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height; and • g. Per Section 17.08.060(K) of the Development Code, the maximum height of walls permitted in residential districts is 6 feet; and h. The proposed walls will be approximately 6 to 15.5 feet above the pad elevations of lots adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. Depending on the location, some walls will be constructed over retaining walls, i.e. a combination wall. Therefore,as seen from the outside, the height of the walls will be greater. The general area where the walls will be highest • is near the southeast corner of the subdivision at Lot 16 where the wall, as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 22 feet high; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed walls are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise levels at the lots along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is necessary to mitigate the noise impacts to a level that is less than 65 dBA CNEL(community noise equivalent level) as specified in the Development Code. If the walls were limited to 6 feet as specified in the Code, or if the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise levels would not comply with the Code nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety policies relating to noise(Goal PS-13 of the General Plan). There is no practical alternative to walls that will achieve the desired noise attenuation. • • b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The project site is located approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) at the east side of East Avenue. As a result, it is exposed to noise generated by traffic that is generally not present near other residential properties in the City which are screened by existing development and/or sufficiently distant from these principal noise sources • that noise impacts are negligible. • • B & C-149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-23 VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 —CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 • Page 3 c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise. The exterior noise levels generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and would negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the outdoor areas of his property in the absence of these walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise attenuating materials used in the construction of the homes is augmented by the presence of the noise attenuating perimeter wall. The absence of the wall would reduce the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the occupants of the homes to elevated interior noise. d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The Foothill Freeway (SR-210) corridor within the City is adjacent to numerous residential properties. Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to levels as described in the Development Code and consistent with the General Plan. The freeway corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the Very Low(VL) Residential Districts. Walls of this height, or similar, are common along the freeway corridor for noise attenuation purposes where residential properties are adjacent to the freeway. e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The height of the walls as seen from East Avenue will be 6 feet and will not be adjacent to any private property. In addition to appearing to have the typical height of a perimeter wall, the wall, along with associated • landscaping, will be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The height of the wall as seen from the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) will be similar to the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor within the City. This wall will be constructed per the decorative design established by Caltrans. The properties adjacent to the wall along the east perimeter of the proposed subdivision are vacant. This wall will be constructed of decorative block per the City's design guidelines. Upon development of the properties to the east of Lots 17 through 22, any residential structures, in compliance with the minimum rear yard setback standard, will be at least 60 feet from the wall. The lot immediately east of Lot 16 will likely have a matching pad elevation when it is developed to match the proposed subdivision (for grading, street alignment, and drainage purposes). Therefore, the retaining portion of the wall (approximately 7.5 feet in height) as seen from this lot would be buried reducing the visible height of the wall. • 4. The Planning Department staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment..Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures for the project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and the attached Standard Conditions. • B & C-150 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-23 VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT May 25, 2011 Page 4 • Planning Department 1) Approval is for perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a combined area of approximately 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2011 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2011 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • B & C-151 , ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ivrl DEPARTMENT ndossali STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2009-00020 SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL LOCATION: FREEWAY (SR-210) -APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, AND -20. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • Completion Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole . discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-23, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1. Variance approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not /_/_ commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. • SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00020StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-152 Project No. DRC2009-00020 Completion Date • 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. • 3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /_/ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. • • • • • 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2009-00020StdCond 5-25.doc B & C-153 SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 25, 2011 NAME COMPANY 'ADDRESS Lua. /.a lgerAbtAgez, CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on May 25, 2011, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission continued the following item(s) to its meeting to be held on July 13, 2011. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT -A proposal to subdivide four(4) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APNs: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020-CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT-A request to allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the south perimeter of a proposed 76-lot subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210); • APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related file: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: Ayes: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY Noes: NONE Absent: NONE Abstain: NONE Date: May 26, 2011 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Lois J. Schrader, declare as follows: I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; that at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on May 25, 2011, said public hearing was opened and continued to the time and place specified in the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE shown above; and that on May 26, 2011, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., a copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place near the door in which said meeting was held. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 26, 2011, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. p Lois . Schrag Planning Commission Secretary CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on May 25, 2011, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission continued the following item(s) to its meeting to be held on June 22, 2011. NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2010-00188M - MCALAN'S PUB AND GRILL-A request to modify CUP DRC2010-00188 to increase the hours of operation of the Restaurant/Bar use to add two additional hours during Sunday through Wednesday and one additional hour on Thursday and with no change to entertainment hours. Located at 6321 Haven Avenue - APN: 201-272-06. Related File: Entertainment Permit DRC2010-00189. The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: Ayes: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY Noes: NONE • Absent: NONE Abstain: NONE Date: May 26, 2011 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Lois J. Schrader, declare as follows: I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; that at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on May 25, 2011, said public hearing was opened and continued to the time and place specified in the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE shown above; and that on May 26, 2011, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., a copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place near the door in which said meeting was held. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 26, 2011, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. v Lois J. Sc / er Planning Commission Secretary Page 1 of 1 • Smith, Michael /tG02d Copy From: Harrison, Mike [Mike_Harrison @cjuhsd.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 4:07 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: continuance Suirri O Ra 4 1DC200t7 . Q0O1&j Mike: The Chaffey Joint Union High School District requests a continuance to July 13 to address the issues raised by the letter from South Coast Air Quality Management District dated May 25, 2011. Mike Harrison Director Operations Planning Chaffey Joint Union High School District 909 988 8511 ext. 2510 • 5/25/2011 I.: South Coast • 1 4i Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive,Diamond Bar,CA 91765-4182 ' (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov E-Mailed: May 25. 2011 May 25, 2011 michael.smith@cityofrc.us Mr. Mike Smith CITY OF RAF C110 CUCA t + GA Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga MAY 2 5 2011 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RECEIVED - PLANNING • Review of the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft MND) for the Proposed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Protect The South Coast Air Quality Management District(AQMD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. The following comments are meant as guidance for the lead agency and should be incorporated into the final environmental document as appropriate. The AQMD staff is concerned that the lead agency has not demonstrated that the proposed project will have less than significant air quality impacts absent a health risk assessment and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis for the project. Specifically, . the lead agency should quantify the potential health risk impacts to future sensitive receptors (i.e., residents) at the project site which is located only 135 feet away from the 210 Freeway. The 210 Freeway is a potentially significant source of toxic air pollutants due to the approximate 153,000 vehicles per day that travel along this section. Consistent with the CARB Land Use Handbook' the lead agency should include mitigation in the final CEQA document that precludes any sensitive land uses within 500 feet of the 210 Freeway. Further, AQMD staff recommends that pursuant to Section 15064.4 of the CEQA Guidelines; "the lead agency should make a good faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate the amount of GHG emissions resulting from a project." Therefore, the lead agency should revise the CEQA document to include a HRA and GHG emissions analysis. In the event that the I California Air Resources Board. April 2005. "Air Quality and Land Use Handbook:A Community Health Perspective." Accessed at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/landuse.htm 8 / c r Mr. Mike Smith 2 May 25. 2011 lead agency's revised CEQA document demonstrates significant adverse air quality impacts the lead agency should require mitigation pursuant to Section 15071 and/or 15092 of the CEQA Guidelines. Details regarding these comments are attached to this letter. AQMD staff is available to work with the lead agency to address these issues and any other questions that may arise. Please contact Dan Garcia, Air Quality Specialist CEQA Section, at(909) 396-3304, if you have any questions regarding the enclosed comments. Sinccerelly,/ // Ian MacMillan Program Supervisor, CEQA Inter-Governmental Review Planning, Rule Development& Area Sources Attachment IM:DG SBCI10429-02 Control Number Mr. Mike Smith 3 May 25, 2011 Potential Health Risk Impacts to Sensitive Land Uses 1. Based on the lead agency's discussion regarding toxic air contaminant(Section 5.3) of the Air Quality Analysis Report in the draft MND the proposed project includes sensitive land uses (i.e., residences) within 500 feet of the 210 Freeway. As a result, the AQMD staff is concerned about the potential health risk impacts from toxic air pollutants emitted by the significant volume of traffic that would travel in close proximity to these homes. The lead agency relies on the use of air filters with a minimum efficiency reporting value(MERV) of 12 placed in residential HVAC systems to mitigate the project's health risk impacts from the 210 Freeway below the significance level. While these filters can be effective against particulate pollution they do not have the ability to remove a wide variety of gaseous pollutants (i.e.,NOx, TAC's and VOC's) associated with traffic-related pollution. These filters also have no effectiveness on outdoor activities associated with residential uses and require long term and potentially costly maintenance. Lastly, without quantifying the level of potential air quality impacts from the freeway, nor the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures, the lead agency has not demonstrated that this impact is less than significant. Therefore, AQMD staff recommends that the lead agency maintain the 500-foot buffer specified in the CARE Land Use Handbook for any new residential project built close to a freeway. Quantification of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions 2. The AQMD staff is concerned that the lead agency has failed to calculate GHG emissions impacts from the proposed project. AQMD staff refers the lead agency to Section 15064.4 of the CEQA guidelines which requires that the lead agency "make a good faith effort"to quantify the GHG emissions impacts from the proposed project. Further, AQMD staff notes that based on the technical information provided in the Air Quality Analysis Report provided with the MND the lead agency has adequate technical information (e.g., type of construction equipment, hours of equipment operation, material delivery trips, energy consumption, vehicle miles traveled, etc.)to calculate the GHG emissions impacts from the proposed project. Therefore, AQMD staff requests that the lead agency revise the CEQA document to include a quantitative analysis of greenhouse gases, a determination of significance, and, if necessary, feasible mitigation measures. Either the URBEM1S 20072 or CaIEEMod3 land use software model can be used to quantify these potential impacts and mitigation measures. 2 The URBEM1S 2007 Software Model can be found at: http://www.urbemis.com/ 3 The CaIEEMod Software Model can be found at: http://www.caleemod.com/ A 14 \: W aJ �1 �O asp^�� Q CID C6 — � � ' �U 0 Q o +" J i fa Q U U sCi. : ', . a 0. o ; C U O 4-j V 0 0 ca U Z V M > c }' CC O G (Mn:: +' - 0 41 4_ N E i — t (YI/1 ■ Z >. C ( -0 S.- . . U (f) C CV i ( • -• - ti Z V N . O �,iiii in <. - 2oO0o cc - 2 oo G o — w N 0 -1-1 MI (n O V • a O E QN u .rL' o V Z F- V v v f° ~ CU ; 4 , C WZ Q co a Q cud rl C W O rl Z 2 cc -io � v ° ° c O . O 0 N cu > ( O N ,. :2 ocZ O c '0 � -0 co N ;. }, •- v� W � i 4J C � — >� f � y . . Z 2 H Q a� = z c W Q V < - a c6 OU I E ;- I 4i -a 1 a �—, C �. Wr tb0 a N! A 1 C L O E ` co I i _ 'N N C E Q +� •— o o O o a) E U -a L c co > U • CM O 4A U U > +'' ca N L N c a1 0 > a . 01 Q N OD L ¢. ` r-I Q -0 O a-+ _ v .c2 , . l; +-+ ct N '�� gig,•= o O fB U L 4J �C N L L ri O •— l0 C N _ a-+ N L .0 can - O v —i v ,C CD CI) it U O O c cu_C C O . i -0 4-+ ca O = l 73 N •v v v I c •- � L V -Q C C s CO N L •N a , N • r• +� L Q O 0 C O • • • U • 2 • cap • . I.F C • u4.1,i' _ I r. p ,p,1 �� C p allll� _i• U (.9 •ay :I �'Al _ �, = O • �' ,� Q 0 v >. N er LT,' OS 11 „..1( u -0 . .., 11Iir . C MIU°-, . 4-, 4-1 .....ire.. C O N C 4 -1-J N > •II N U p t,. _O N N 4- u 0 Q O O O N C D Q a-+ 4J (� It • . s - ••C L U 4 V w p a 4 •4:..." O _ow O N J p L N L CD C Q•a--+0 t = O N L CL E S E E i o a)oO a) o O 1- p • — ON U O t o O N U c o in a O N 'O 2 rI `--1 Q) r U w w U O C -a U •L _0 .n •L N IC cv -0 N ON ' p O E E O ^ L- cn d) 4-1 N N N 4-1 N N f Q E i•' U Z E t O N — v) •„„, . . ;'I N O U cn ate+▪ N N N N N U N — O CO O Q to fk .'''*. i.. . ,4,...;,,,,I,,,,,',.,,. 0 4 O w (m ah:„,, , „,,,,,,., a)c L _ 0 V au N 0 Q a 4 _ '? O w$ , N N C L > o a, z a- a - yl = 0 co V)'411 c — 's. c • 0 CU c/) (II L U U _ ® z o CU .c/) (13 a) ° > L ��' ��'�CU :CC N Pat x o O O U .� , b 'c.P , ( y -+'k+la 4 _ f0 0 L — a) J._ _ 0 CU 0_ W C 0 �0C -0 O O N L Q a�J a--+ L w, 4-+ co on _ CL = r. E a) N th O vi s- 4-,"O C . ate--' ate--' - ate-+ O (B C -O '� — cn — CO a N hA L '� x. C L C Q L O •`n aA O }' — — 4- Q < N H < CC 0u E N m d' In O O O O a.J M -C C tap ca CO CO •° — O aJ a) CO � n3 E \ U I- a) fD 4-a a • O L I _U a -o o u . CD a) 4-. ^ o •� a;`'. vii C C = Q 0 O 4-, C 7 — N • C _ bp }, v) C C :+ �m ¢ 5� .OW :a) Q� C 0 Ln- '`;g,_ `�-1 \ N > ate-+ O 3' S U v (D O C Li) U a 0 O i i O mC Z C C CI o.- o ro m �' ° C o o w. C N Q N `n C C aJ -0 a) L 0 O c6 O O U �' O U4-1 +� U ca U -0 i C a-�+ 4- co +� f0 , Q; •�o co N a) - +>+ i O U f, C •— a) 4-',,,,.,, 0 C n O ri i. N. 00 Ol r- I r l �. t ' C 3 s4 � ,5 ,.. ,g r yy a W ^N 'S�+�r�• 3= of d ? `ss g '^ w. U • V J u E 3Q ? i y 4 jt _ fs§ B CY Y d _ i$f. E 2g g3 A _ al • ti $ Z (10 a) O J • A • • v •* • V to a--) •sara• • , < t X11 !i L— +J • 0 CU (13 L_ (1) U L_ c to VI `n C n O O 0 1 C-+ O C c t!, — a- . 4— •- O O to u --C3 .- CIJ w ‘.... w• ,U + U a) C O _0 :,, E 4-„13 • •— 0 D O -� O C to Q) GJ 3 -b- E c)- -- „L- H E _. 4....7:5 0 •— ‘.... U 03 -0 0_ C •`I s- > C N M tltl 7: ;-,_'.;;;.,:14 -0 Q) -.4- , —o + 1 O �O -4-1 . .. rI,. U = J- , � ,Ills Q) O >. Q) U C _ _ ��, a;.: — C _ 5;, ; U -- CO O • ,�til i RN .., *' - O a O ' ` > • `I - i •i , r - e � ' - � sk . , , c.,) : > O d. 0 Q) ,: L '1_ Q Q) 4 .j V+ 4.) -0 f a 0 II _1_ O Q 1 E .. 0 K., � U 7:5 C _C — or,,..,,,,, , t 1 E (1.) 73 E -0 ._ i , r„4 , ,:- :'I"' ,i..., . ; .' . ," LU LU Q) ' co CC t , • l0 h. 00 al r-I c-I ‘-I r-I ., • h c 0 .L >• O 0,4, N CO . r 0 - CD 0 N a--+ •v V > O G . 4 a- / s,_ = - } — W ' ate--+ U (0 �f0 C (O N fro (a cn C 4-1 a) N p 7 a1 C L , a✓ L C v it i -.10 c 0) C 0 au, �. : C > 0 L_ a) > ._ a--+ i �,CU/ c'-''_ I V Q L aJ Z I . U C ate., C N C a� ' W _o 4_ N N a) i O N v) cn 06 N cu (J) > •p O w c c (6 a C Q cn C (n v, 0 c t Q '� 0 w Q Q L C U CU E QJ dA 2 N z 00 - H _c •in (a •N w v Q C Z a✓ — (-) 0 ri cn (v W _ (0 0 c U z • • 2 -0 > 0 pop 0 0 v ••L Z (O (6 c d. L c i'' .s 175 O (! > 0 on N C 0 f z }' o a.) a aJ O +' D �,; '14, W _ z cn -C U > CO +a • ',' . r." a, • s — •0 0 • . a) O p 4— 7:3 _ CC C E co ca c U i' O — L -0 0 U U �c/) Q. I ca �,,;;i c aJ N Q C as) 0 ai F c < > o , , './ bD .- . C Z v U . Q O O O co , w v O 0 a) ,, CC ._ •� > 0 3 G 0 C O O p N }' . O U N v) > � :.. cc.cc 2 LL ca a) to Mks ,1