No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015/06/03 - Agenda Packet City of CHO UUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive � Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730.3801 City Office: (909)477.2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD SUCCESSOR AGENCY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, JUNE 39 2015 REGULAR MEETINGS 1St and 31d Wednesdays � 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room................. 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications City Manager Announcements Conduct of Closed Session REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers.......................... 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander Lynne B. Kennedy Diane Williams CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison ` CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds c CITY TREASURER James C. Frost INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ���yy..,�IS )� -qA' CHO e4CAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD,SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda,please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display visual material,please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences.Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During"Public Communications,"your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period,all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items(with the exception of public hearing items)will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other"Public Communications"which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an"Advertised Public Hearing"or on an"Administrative Hearing"Item(s),your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City s Public Library(-ies) and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings"on-demand"from their computers. The added feature of"Streaming Video On Demand"is available on the City's website at www.cifyofrc.us/cifyhalUcounciUvideos.aspforthose with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem)or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.In the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cifvof c.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting Is In session. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 39 2015 A. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) i C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) D. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION WILL OCCUR E. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM E1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AND FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP.—CITY, FIRE E2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GC §54956.8 REGARDING REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8812 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND 8870 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, NORTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, WEST OF VINEYARD, IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0208-091-36 AND 0208-091- 72. NEGOTIATING PARTIES: MIKE COSTELLO, FIRE CHIEF AND REGINA N. DANNER, ESQ. ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICT AND DAVID J. AND ELIZABETH F. WALTERS, TRUSTEES OF THE DAVID J. AND ELIZABETH F. WALTERS LIVING TRUST, DATED DECEMBER 30, 2013 AND ALFREDO MACIAS AND HILDA F. HORDYK, TRUSTEES OF THE MACIAS/HORDYK FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, DATED MAY 30, 2003. UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS. —FIRE E3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF WHITTRAM AND ETIWANDA AVENUES; NEGOTIATING PARTIES LEONARD SANTORO, CBRE AND CHARLIE BUQUET; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.—CITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, Aft PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA «AM�� JUNE 31 2015 E4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) — NUMBER OF CASES (2) — SUCCESSOR AGENCY F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of Lifesaving Citation to Breanna Medina, Emergency Management Coordinator for her role in a recent medical emergency. H2. Recognition of the Healthy RC Youth Leaders for receiving 15, Place in the Directing Change Student Film Contest focused on suicide prevention and ending the silence about mental illness among their peers. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board, Successor Agency or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 39 2015 The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 20, 2015 (Regular Meeting) -- J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated May 13,2015 through May 26, 2015 for the 1 total of$563,005.52. J3. Consideration to approve Amendment No. 002 extending the term of contract CO 13-210 10 with Commercial Cleaning Systems (CCS) of Costa Mesa, California to June 30, 2016, including a fee increase effective January 1, 2016, for Citywide Janitorial Services in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for City and $50,000 for Fire District to be funded from 1001312-5304 (Facilities Maintenance), 1700312-5304 (Sports Complex), and 3281529- 5300 (Fire Facilities Maintenance) contingent upon the adopted budget for FY 2015-2016; authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contracts in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department janitorial service budget line 5304 and Fire District janitorial service budget line 5300; and to renew said contracts upon mutual consent of City, Fire District and Contractor for one (1)year periods up to an additional four(4)years ending June 30, 2020. J4. Consideration to approve Amendment 003 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. of Irwindale, 12 California extending the term of contract CO 89-136 to June 30,2016 with minor adjustments to the scope of work in an amount not to exceed $398,700 in FY 2015-2016; approve Amendment 003 extending the term of contract CO 90-145 to June 30, 2016 in an amount not to exceed $625,150 in FY 2015-2016; approve Amendment 006 extending the term of contract CO 93-006 to June 30, 2016 in an amount not to exceed $827,350 for City facilities and $70,200 for Fire District facilities in FY 2015-2016; for the maintenance of City parks, Archibald Library, County wash ends, and City and Fire District landscape sites, with no fee increases for City and Fire District facilities; contingent on the adopted budget for FY 2015- 2016,to be funded from various General, Special and Fire Fund accounts;authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contracts in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department landscape maintenance budget line 5300 and Fire District landscape maintenance budget line 5300; and to renew said contracts upon mutual consent of City, Fire District and Contractor for one (1) year periods up to an additional four(2) years ending June 30, 2018. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2015 K. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY I K1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 20, 2015 (Regular Meeting) L. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY L1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 20, 2015 (Regular Meeting) M. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL M1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 20, 2015 (Special City Council Meeting) and — May 20, 2015 (Regular Meeting). M2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated May 13, 2015 through May 26, 2015 and 14 payroll ending May 26,2015 for the total of$3,721,605.36. M3. Consideration to approve Amendment No. 002 extending the term of contract CO 13-210 23 with Commercial Cleaning Systems (CCS) of Costa Mesa, California to June 30, 2016, including a fee increase effective January 1, 2016, for Citywide Janitorial Services in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for City and $50,000 for Fire District to be funded from 1001312-5304 (Facilities Maintenance), 1700312-5304 (Sports Complex), and 3281529- 5300 (Fire Facilities Maintenance) contingent upon the adopted budget for FY 2015-2016; authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contracts in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department janitorial service budget line 5304 and Fire District janitorial service budget line 5300; and to renew said contracts upon mutual consent of City, Fire District and Contractor for one (1) year periods up to an additional four(4) years ending June 30, 2020. M4. Consideration to approve Amendment 003 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. of Irwindale, 25 California extending the term of contract CO 89-136 to June 30,2016 with minor adjustments to the scope of work in an amount not to exceed $398,700 in FY 2015-2016; approve Amendment 003 extending the term of contract CO 90-145 to June 30, 2016 in an amount not to exceed $625,150 in FY 2015-2016; approve Amendment 006 extending the term of contract CO 93-006 to June 30, 2016 in an amount not to exceed $827,350 for City facilities and $70,200 for Fire District facilities in FY 2015-2016; for the maintenance of City parks, Archibald Library, County wash ends, and City and Fire District landscape sites, with no fee increases for City and Fire District facilities; contingent on the adopted budget for FY 2015- 2016,to be funded from various General, Special and Fire Fund accounts;authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contracts in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department landscape maintenance budget line 5300 and Fire District landscape maintenance budget line 5300; and to renew said contracts upon mutual consent of City, Fire District and Contractor for one (1) year periods up to an additional four(2)years ending June 30, 2018. M5. Consideration to reject the bid for the "Public Safety IAQ HVAC Project" as non-responsive 27 to the needs of the City. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 39 2015 M6. Consideration to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract 29 for"Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance", effective July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, to the lowest responsive bidder, Siemens Industry, Inc. of Orange, California, contingent on the adopted budget for FY 2015/2016 in an amount not to exceed $788,050 to be funded from accounts 1177303-5300($768,050) and 1001318-5300($20,000);authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contract in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Services Department Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting maintenance budget line 5300 and to renew said contract upon mutual consent of City and Contractor for additional one (1) year periods up to a total of five (5) years ending June 30, 2020. M7. Consideration to approve amendment No. 003 to renew contract CO 08-162 with United 35 Pacific Service, Inc. (UPS) of La Habra, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for Citywide Tree Maintenance services effective July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, contingent upon the adopted budget for FY 2015-2016 in an annual amount not to exceed $977,500, to be funded from various City and landscape maintenance district accounts; authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contract in the future on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department tree maintenance budget lines 5300 and 5310;and to renew said contract upon mutual consent of City and Contractor for one(1)year periods up to an additional four(4) years ending June 30, 2020. M8. Consideration to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the 37 contract in the amount of$517,813.20,to the lowest responsive bidder, R.J. Noble Company, and authorize the expenditure of a 10%contingency in the amount of$51,781.32, for the 81h Street from Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue, Baker Avenue from Main Street to Foothill boulevard and 61h Street from Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Projects to be funded from Gas Tax RT7360 and Measure I Funds, Account Nos. 11743035650/1849174-0, 11743035650/1851174-0 and 11773035650/1869177-0. M9. Consideration of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,California, 39 adopting the amended Measure 01" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for the expenditure of Measure"I"funds covering fiscal years 2014/2015 to 2018/2019. RESOLUTION NO. 15-081 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2014/2015 TO 2018/2019 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE 'S" FUNDS M10. Consideration for approval to authorize City Staff to file the claim for reimbursement from 43 San Bernardino County Transportation Commission of Local Transportation Fund—Article 3 Pedestrian, Bicycle Facilities for eligible grant funds expended by the City for the Pacific Electric Trail Connection Project (aka Day Trail Improvements). M11. Consideration for approval to authorize City Staff to file the claim for reimbursement from 45 San Bernardino County Transportation Commission of Local Transportation Fund—Article 3 Pedestrian, Bicycle Facilities for eligible grant funds expended by the City for the Pacific Electric Trail Connection Project(aka Deer/Day Trails Improvements). FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ..,, JUNE 39 2015 M12. Consideration of approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, 47 accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 18744, located on the north side of the 210 freeway westbound off-ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Lennar Homes of California, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 15-082 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 18744 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M13. Consideration of approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, 50 accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 18794 located at the north side of-ph Street, submitted by DCT 8th&Vineyard, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 15-083 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 18794 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. M14. Consideration of a Light Variance requested for Minors, Majors,Juniors and Senior Divisions 53 Tournament hosted by District 71 Little League during June 15—July 31, 2015, at Heritage, Day Creek, Epicenter and Red Hill Community Parks. M15. Consideration to approve a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga 55 and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG)for the selection of a developer to entitle, construct, and operate a transit-oriented, mixed-use development at the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. Consideration of Environmental Assessment and Development Code Amendment 82 DRC2014-00879 — City of Rancho Cucamonga - A proposal to amend the Development Code to provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR)for hotels and motels (only) in order to allow more flexibility in the size of these types of uses/developments located within the City. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00232. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, is PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1„"ekA.,ovcr JUNE 39 2015 ORDINANCE NO. 874 (FIRST READING) 240 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879, A REQUEST TO AMEND RATIO (FAR) OF 1.0 FOR HOTELS AND MOTELS(ONLY)IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT IN ORDER TO ALLOW MORE FLEXIBILITY IN THE SIZE OF THESE TYPES OF USES/DEVELOPMENTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. N2. Consideration of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 245 00546—7418 Archibald, LLC - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential for 2.25 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Consideration of Environmental Assessment and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 —7418 Archibald,LLC-A request to amend the Zoning Map from Low(L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to establish a Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District(SH)for 2.25 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road;APN: 0208- 031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Consideration of Environmental Assessment and Development Agreement DRC2014-00610 -7418 Archibald, LLC—A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 741 B Archibald, LLC,for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD), including deviating from certain development standards, for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue,south of Base Line.Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015- 00275. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 15-OB4 422 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00546, A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH (H) RESIDENTIAL FOR 2.25 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 39 2015 ORDINANCE NO. 875 (FIRST READING) 427 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00547 TO CHANGE 2.25 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH (H) RESIDENTIAL AND TO ESTABLISH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (SH), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 876(FIRST READING) 433 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2014-00610 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (SHOZD) INCLUDING A DEVIATION FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 24,641 SQUARE FOOT, 60-UNIT SENIOR APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 2.25 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59 N3. Consideration of Environmental Assessment and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 438 DRC2014-00561 — Caldwell Land Solutions - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation from School (S)to Low Medium(LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a 6.5 acre site located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the Victoria Community Plan; APN: 1089-011-04. ORDINANCE NO. 877 (FIRST READING) 589 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FROM SCHOOL (S) TO LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 6.5 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE IN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089-011-04. N4. A public hearing for placement of special assessments and liens for delinquent refuse 593 accounts. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 3, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 15-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 608 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF DELINQUENT CHARGES FROM BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR REFUSE COLLECTION, WHICH SHALL CONSTITUTE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND AND SHALL BE COLLECTED FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS ORDINARY COUNTY AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 01. Consideration of the resignation of Commissioner Frances Howdyshell and authorization to 610 advertise the vacancy, accept applications for the Planning Commission/Historic Preservation Commission. P. COUNCIL BUSINESS LLJ The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. P1. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S 616 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES. P2. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S 617 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION. P3. CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S 618 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION BOARD. P4. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the —" meetings that were attended.) P5. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING �\ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, �� ��f► PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 35 2015 R. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 28, 2015, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and on the City's website. Li A. Troyan, MC it Clerk Services Director rty of Rancho Cucamonga May 20, 2015 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 3:30 P.M. TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a special meeting on Wednesday, May 20, 2015 in the Tri- Communities Room, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 3:30 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy(arrived 4:08 p.m.), Diane Williams (arrived 3:33 p.m.), Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director and Daniel Schneider, Community Services Superintendent. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo led the Pledge of Allegiance. B. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC I No public communications were made. IC. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION I Cl. DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION TO RELOCATE THE RC FAMILY SPORTS CENTER. Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director, and Daniel Schneider, Community Services Superintendent, outlined, via Power Point, their analysis of two potential sites for relocation of the Sports Center - Central Park and the Epicenter Parking Lot G. The Sports Center's current lease expires December 2017 and the property owner is not interested in renewing a lease with the City. Options explored included locating to an existing building or building a facility on a vacant site. Council goals adopted in 2014 and 2015 included the development of a prioritized list of potential options for the replacement of the RC Family Sports Center and Council decided to focus on Parking Lot G at the Epicenter complex as the location for a City owned gymnasium. If Council concurs with staff's recommendation to move forward with the design process for the Epicenter Parking Lot G plan, the next step is architectural design, returning to Council in June. The project is anticipated to be completed by December 2017. Bob Mueting and Larry Ryan of RJM Design Group, reviewed the conceptual design of a facility at Parking Lot G, Attachment 1 of the Staff Report, and responded to Council questions. * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 12 Council Member Williams recommended the building be energy efficient and include a family restroom. She questioned size and rental of the meeting room for private events. Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director, stated the facility will be built with energy efficient materials and include a family restroom. In response to Council Member Williams, City Manager Gillison concurred staff will be aggressive with fundraising and sponsorship efforts. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo believed the meeting room would be used by community organizations and Parking Lot G is an ideal location for the Center. He commented adding a full size kitchen could be operated by youth groups for fundraising. While Council Member Alexander was disappointed that the facility was not going to be at Central Park, he supported the Parking Lot G relocation. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to move the project forward (Epicenter Parking Lot G plan). Motion carried 5-0. IADJOURNMENT I The special meeting adjourned at 4:13 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER I The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a special closed session meeting on Wednesday, May 20,2015 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 4:45 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were:John Gillison, City Manager;James L. Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels,Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director; and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS I The following closed session items were considered: Cl. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF WHITTRAM AND ETIWANDA AVENUES; NEGOTIATING PARTIES LEONARD SANTORO, CBRE AND CHARLIE BUQUET; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.-CITY C2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B)-NUMBER OF CASES (2)-SUCCESSOR AGENCY IC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I No public communications were made. * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 12 ID. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS I No discussion or action was taken. IADJOURNMENT I The special meeting adjourned at 5:00 p.m. with no action taken. IA. CALL TO ORDER I The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, May 20, 2015 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:01 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were:John Gillison, City Manager;James L. Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels,Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director; and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS I The following closed session items were considered: E2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AND FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP. -CITY, FIRE IC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I No public communications were made. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS I No discussion or action was taken. IRECESS I The closed session recessed at 6:25 p.m. with no action taken. * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 12 REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 700 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the City Council Chamber at the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. Council Member Williams ave the Pledge of Allegiance. 9 9 9 IK. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of Proclamations to the City and to Cucamonga Valley Water District declaring May as "Save Our Water Month". Mayor Michael and members of the City Council presented a Proclamation to James Curatalo, Jr., President of Cucamonga Valley Water District, declaring the month of May as"Save our Water Month". Subsequently, Mr. Curatalo presented a Proclamation to the Council commending the City on its ongoing water efficiency efforts including landscape median replacement projects, use of recycled water and encouraging customers to better understand the value of our water supply. H2. Recognition of and appreciation for Southern California Edison, San Bernardino County Flood Control, and San Bernardino County Land Use Services for their assistance with weed and fire hazard abatement in the Rancho Cucamonga. Mike Costello, Fire Chief, Rob Ball, Fire Marshal, and Kelley Donaldson, Community Affairs Coordinator/Public Information Officer expressed gratitude to Southern California Edison, San Bernardino County Flood Control, and San Bernardino County Land Use Services for their assistance with weed and fire abatement in the City. Mayor Michael presented Certificates of Recognition to representatives of these organizations. H4. Proclamation declaring May 2015 as Pediatric Stroke Awareness Month. Pediatric Stroke Survivor Bradley Fox and his mother, Nina Mule, received a Proclamation declaring May as Pediatric Stroke Awareness Month and shared their experiences in overcoming difficulties. H5. Introduction of the City's New Park Rangers. JoAnn Gwynn, Community Services Manager, and Janelle Draper, Community Services Coordinator, introduced the City of Rancho Cucamonga's first Park Rangers: Alfredo Fierro, and Christopher Kivett. Mayor Michael and Council thanked them for their service and welcomed them in their new positions. * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 12 Item taken out of order: H3. Proclamation declaring May as Building and Safety Month. Mayor Michael presented a Proclamation declaring the month of May as Building and Safety Month to the following Building and Safety Department employees: Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Services Director; Mike Frasure, Building & Safety Supervisor; Joseph Ford, Building Inspector; Chris LeBere, Building Inspector; Sonia Mulligan, Office Specialist II; Curtis Randolph, Plans Examiner and Kevin Rugg, Building Inspector. A power point presentation was shown highlighting the Department. Larry Brugger, Government Relations Manager International Code Council — ICC, spoke about the building industry. H6. Honoring Peace Officer Memorial Day. Danielle Boldt, Chief of Police, introduced Narcie Sousa, Peace Officer of the Year, and showed the San Bernardino District Attorney's Office's video entitled "Peace Officer Memorial Ceremony" held at the Rancho Cucamonga Superior Court. L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS L1. Jennifer Shaw, Regional Manager, Local Public Affairs for Southern California Edison, reminded about their grants program. L2. Janet Walton spoke about the recent National Day of Prayer event and offered a prayer. L3. Alberto Guerrero expressed support for the City's Circulation Master Plan for Bicyclists and Pedestrians. L4. Jame McGuire supported the proposed West Side Landscape Maintenance fee but opposed the 3% yearly increase. L5. Melissa Schweigert spoke about a dog at the City's animal shelter. L6. Dana Keithly commented on the City's animal shelter. L7. Teresa Akahoshi, Rancho Cucamonga Library Foundation Board, invited everyone to attend the "Tour de Fork" fundraiser event on June 11, 2015 from 5:30 — 8:30 p.m. at Victoria Gardens. L8. John Lyons urged parents to educate their children on not drinking and driving during graduation time,spoke about the Police Memorial at the Court House and the toll road in San Bernardino County. L9. Susan Keithly provided comments concerning the City's animal shelter. L10. Mia Dravis remarked about the animal shelter. * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 12 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 6, 2015 (Regular Meeting) J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated April 29, 2015 through May 12, 2015 for the total of $444,663.52. J3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30,2015. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports for Consent Calendar Items J1 —J3. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY K1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 6,2015 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve the Minutes of May 6, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY I L1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 6, 2015 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Kennedy,seconded by Council Member Alexander,to approve the Minutes of May 6, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. M. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL 1 M1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: May 6, 2015 (Special City Council Meeting — Team Presentations) and May 6, 2015 (Regular Meeting) M2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated April 29,2015 through May 12,2015 and payroll ending May 12, 2015 for the total of$5,171,084.55. M3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 2015. M4. Consideration to appropriate$100,419 into Account No. 1 001 31 4-5303 and approval to execute Professional Services Agreement with PlaceWorks in the amount of$91,290 and an allocation of a 10% contingency of $9,129 for a total expenditure of $100,419 for the peer review of the draft Initial Study, Notice of Preparation, Environmental Impact Report, technical reports, and response to comments prepared by BonTerra Psomas for the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 12 Area Specific Plan Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan Amendment Project (Empire Lakes Specific Plan Project) to be funded from Account No. 1001314-5303. M5. Consideration to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Sargent Town Planning not to exceed $1,361,956 for consultant services and allocation of a 15% contingency for a total expenditure of $1,566,249 for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and associated entitlements for the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Project and for the authorization to appropriate $1,566,249 from the Sphere of Influence Issues Reserve into Account No. 100314-5300 (contract services) for the City initiated annexation. M6. Consideration to authorize the purchase of one (1) CNG One Ton SRW Extended Cab utility truck from Frontier Ford, of Santa Clara, California, in accordance with Request for Bid ("RFB") #14/15-013 (replacing unit #812) in the amount of $52,960.48 from account number 1712001- 5604 (Equipment/Vehicle Replacement Fund). M7. Consideration to accept the "Civic Center— Roof Restoration Project", Contract No. 14-200, as complete, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Labor and Materials Bond; approve a Resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release of the retention 35 days after acceptance; and approve the final contract amount of $213,832. RESOLUTION NO. 15-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE "CIVIC CENTER — ROOF SYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT", CONTRACT NO. 14-200 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M8. Consideration to reject all bids received for the "Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement — FY 14/15" project as non-responsive to the needs of the City. M9. Consideration of approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Demolition and Reclamation of the Existing Buildings at the Future Los Amigos Park Project. RESOLUTION NO. 15-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "DEMOLITION AND RECLAMATION OF THE EXISTING BUILDINGS AT THE FUTURE LOS AMIGOS PARK PROJECT"IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M10. Consideration of release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 024047250 in the amount of $2,695.00, for the Cultural Center Lobby Painting project, Contract No. 13-290. M11. Consideration to approve an Improvement Agreement extension for DRC2014-00378, located northwest corner of 6th Street and Rochester Avenue,submitted by Dedeaux Properties, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 15-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2014-00378 M12. Consideration of approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for landscape improvements for Tact 16324 located at the north and south sides of Colonbero between Wardman Bullock and Ambleside and the east side of Ambleside from Colonbero north to the * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 7 of 12 tract boundary, submitted by Meritage Homes of California, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 15-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16324 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M13. Approval to award and authorize the execution of a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $38,530 with Albert Grover & Associates, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $3,853 for the Traffic Signal Design Services at the Intersections of Carnelian Street at Banyan Street and Sixth Street at Utica Avenue and Left Turn Modifications at 3 Intersections along Milliken Avenue, to be funded from Transportation funds, Account Nos. 11243035650/1875124-0, 11243035650/1887124-0, 11243035650/1889124-0. M14. Consideration of approval of Map, Improvement agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 18976 and release of real property liens for Assessor Parcel Numbers 207-262-01, 207-262-02 and 207-262-03, located on the east side of Madrone Avenue,south of Arrow Route, submitted by Madrone&Arrow LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 15-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18976 RESOLUTION NO. 15-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) FOR TRACT 18976 RESOLUTION NO. 15-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18976 RESOLUTION NO. 15-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18976 * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 8 of 12 RESOLUTION NO. 15-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING REAL PROPERTY LIENS FOR ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 207-262-01, 207-262-02 AND 207-262-03 FROM HC VINEYARD, LLC (PARCEL MAP 16141) M15. Consideration of approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Parcel Map 19528, located on the south side of Banyan Street, east of East Avenue, submitted by DIAR LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 15-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR PARCEL MAP 19528 RESOLUTION NO. 15-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR PARCEL MAP 19528 RESOLUTION NO. 15-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR PARCEL MAP 19528 RESOLUTION NO. 15-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR PARCEL MAP 19528 M16. Consideration of approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 18212, located at the north east corner of Base Line Road and San Carmela Court,submitted by DR Horton Los Angeles Holding Company Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 15-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 18212 M17. Consideration of approval of a Resolution declaring intention to establish West-Side Neighborhood Parks and Street Lighting Community Facilities District No. 1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and to authorize the levy of a special tax therein to finance certain facilities and services. * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 12 RESOLUTION NO. 15-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH WEST-SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND STREET LIGHTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN TO FINANCE CERTAIN FACILITIES AND SERVICES MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports for Consent Calendar Items MJ1 — M17. Motion carried 5-0. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL N1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00455 AND ADDENDUM TO GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) -City of Rancho Cucamonga-A proposed amendment to the General Plan for various minor technical and conforming amendments to correct inconsistencies in the text and General Plan Land Use Map; amending the Park (P) designation to Low Medium (LM) Residential for a parcel located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive, and an amendment to the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for hotels and motels in the Industrial Park (IP) Land Use designation to make the hotel and motel FAR consistent with similar Land Use classifications. RESOLUTION NO. 15-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00455, A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN FOR VARIOUS MINOR TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO CORRECT INCONSISTENCIES IN THE TEXT AND GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP; AMENDING THE PARK (P) DESIGNATION TO LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL FOR A PARCEL LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE; AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) FOR HOTELS AND MOTELS IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) LAND USE DESIGNATION TO MAKE THE HOTEL AND MOTEL FAR CONSISTENT WITH SIMILAR LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF Candyce Burnett, Planning Director, and Mike Smith, Associate Planner, reviewed the proposed General Plan amendments, noting these items were inconsistencies as a result of a previous update to the General Plan. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing for Item 01. Public communications: There were none. Mayor Michael closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to adopt Resolution No. 15-080. Motion carried 5-0. * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 of 12 0. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL 01. Update on the City's New Park Ranger Program. Daniel Schneider, Community Services Superintendent and JoAnne Gwynn, Community Services Manager, presented the program's background, purpose, responsibilities and training. Staff explained how Rangers activities will be tracked and reported via use of the IPad. Item received and filed. 02. Consideration of the Circulation Master Plan for Bicyclists and Pedestrians (CMP). Candyce Burnett, Planning Director; Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner and Michael Parmer, Management Analyst I, City Manager's Office, gave the Staff Report on Item 02. The master plan identified 97 intersections that need to be improved to enhance walking in the City and proposed more than 30 miles of trails and 110 miles of bicycle facilities. Item received and filed. P. COUNCIL BUSINESS I P1. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) Mayor Michael announced at a recent SANBAG General Policy Committee meeting, action was taken to forward to the SANBAG Board a request to assist in funding a Forest Management Plan with the US Forest Service, the County of San Bernardino, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Cucamonga Canyon and Lytle Creek area. This issue will be considered at the June SANBAG Board meeting. Council Member Williams reported on her attendance at SCAG's (Southern California Association of Governments) conference on May 7th in Desert Hot Springs. Topics of discussion included affordable housing challenges, housing shortages and economic development. She also reported on her attendance at a LAFCO hearing concerning water conservation districts. P2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Council Member Alexander advised he has received phone calls about the poor quality of the City Council meetings broadcasts. City Manager Gillison responded it is occurring within the confines of the cable company and all phone calls concerning this issue should be forwarded to the City. T. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING , No items were identified. * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 11 of 12 U. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: * * * * * * DRAFT * May 20, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Special Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 12 of 12 ql ID * ƒ \ \ i / / \ \\ {; a ƒ = Z. p o Z , nE ; B a \ ( /y { \\/ ® R — � mj ® C e , „ © • • - --a a / N Lc� � \ \ \ \_ » 0 22 \ tC ( \ E ® \ ` 2 ƒaw \ % ® t \ \ƒ \ / { \ C = ® e .t » R p \ / /" \ \ \ \ �' S z : sx \ ; e ƒ \ n \ ( 0 CA • se. �� P . {2 j ƒ / 2 / °y k tml � 2 mssa » % a \ (tiJj) H ' ƒ \ \ < ) \ \ 6o CD � ) a , \ n / \ ( \ % \ ƒ �' P . Ht / \ / d ` ( \ \ \ �. ; ° \• / \ 6 : = 5 O � \ / / II ! U C . -j ^ \ Ct £ % ( / ƒ § 0 o / & � Rc ® \ \/ R ; \ \ - - _ ® 7327 - ^ \ ° --- - � . - - k � /ƒ . \ / ( \5 == \ Ht aR > � . o ƒ - Ct / \yƒ\ \ ( El rr lik , n r- , 7,145 (,o M s131) 1 diMP a) C rD CL Xi w m n N 0 N in 4 _, LT, ,,b ....,:, _-.__ ,i.. 4.:::; :‘,..... .:,:. .gib:: . . :,. ..:,1,.. . _.,,,,,. . -.-;.,,,,.._ M or • ,11 I 0\ 1.:!1 t 111: AZ ellIV ':1 (:.. '..'...14 OW: 1 ' .-7.* ' it `f. �, ' ,a_•'C 4 ,0-4"to . 1, 1: -.,.... .,,or.‘ .,-.........-,- - a I 74/741 43 lit .1%.1.41 ' 7i a f. ,w, .z A ,it ii fi: .,' I T a ;: ' ' Q CD • • • -s C c = O (D art -. 3 3 O) o n m O (D M (D O cn n n• m- _• _ O (D ( (D 3 c D a' �i r - V) r+ r"- & o O� 1 ✓ '. ..ii Itt.. l` It al • • ‘.. i .,/: i 1 ' ..,..., (D (IP , ii, ,, r-I- CD \. it( g 1 :, It ik 1 i , \ - i, 7* i r-I- n ■. 1 n M 3 __ „.---__, -0 . . . ,.......... ,. _ ..) c. • • • • n ED m co „ n 0 • p —• rf 0_ (co = � rD 0� D• r+ (DD n rte+ O cIQ 'C '� _. n �- 01:1 2 rD o rD• n _v) -N D CD r-t- A Oft D —• CD n '7:1• ";°: +"� : 'IC CM m — • ea - g#3 Imr.1 milli curDI "Ill - %. rl \ w a Elio = 7 t7 ft as < . in, _ /� W (0 I ,<- (// 0 £._= f > r- 0 = p r `a0 - o Q. p _ - „. .. - ..- . . . .. ' •- - ' . .. . _ _. - . --. . . . . . . [ ...k4 • a , 4,..... „,.....40 A pppp . ...„.... iLIVO to, .7*Ift • .." .4.: ... •... 4 ...-4.-4.7. . --;- 5., . :.S ..g- ..1:". ...G. -... ,.....,..1,...•....dr,...416:-.Are .... -.1.- ,.. F•i '- ii' - . .... 4„.„.„. lib'. 7.T.VTO -a N -• "0 1 ".... ' II, 41' e;••• 6 c3 .."14It' .. 4.4 75F .....„...14 .,..i • C11111 4.q.,1 AI ell I - . I . 411•14.6 IIIIIP' 4 1.11%■10 /II _I mil .... ... 3. :. -- AL011,...• ',1;,,:::,.::',4.,.,.?': ' _ 41 (1) -. ':.: 47- .. ••:., ''.:".4'.01110 ',,el _ 0.) a.) • „ig L, 3 .., 4 CD i.r7/111411% b_______ __,....... ..., , , . _... .L: .. I-1- I ._ - __ 0 • o o 1111A .11 ;1:11 .t. rvia .417 < (i) > \\"1.,,.......5 ...- ab , ■1(iy,g11‘ A 111411114 I ." ._ --____— .-rf. , 1111.11.11 1 O ....,,, C >4. w . n ( . , v) O r M LD O th C)0 CI v 7o n (A () rLJ v D �- ID N n - . �, gm 0 E. oo n n D c m = (i) n >4 0.) 3 m -0 r+ N 3 rD O_ O O Pp. C 0q CD 70 D C .c m (D v) ∎mg a O 5.1 CO �y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P1 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358228 05/13/2015 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 162.40 0.00 162.40 AP 00358229 05/13/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 793.21 0.00 793.21 AP 00358230 05/13/2015 A&V SOFTBALL 2,781.00 0.00 2,781.00 AP 00358231 05/13/2015 A.Y.NURSERY INC. 1,809.00 0.00 1,809.00 AP 00358232 05/13/2015 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 122.16 0.00 122.16 AP 00358233 05/13/2015 ACTION AWARDS INC. 69.01 0.00 69.01 AP 00358234 05/13/2015 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 14,175.00 0.00 14,175.00 AP 00358235 05/13/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 . 79.40 AP 00358236 05/13/2015 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 39,639.00 0.00 39,639.00 AP 00358237 05/13/2015 ALLERGY&ASTHMA CENTER 38,659.50 0.00 38,659.50 AP 00358238 05/13/2015 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 16,299.21 16,299.21 AP 00358239 05/13/2015 ALVORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358240 05/13/2015 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 223.71 0.00 223.71 AP 00358241 05/13/2015 ARANA,JONATHON 613.20 0.00 613.20 AP 00358242 05/13/2015 ARREDONDO,ROMONA 250.00 0.00 250.00 . AP 00358243 05/13/2015 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 41.74 41.74 AP 00358244 05/13/2015 AUFBAU CORPORATION 8,740.00 0.00 8,740.00 AP 00358245 05/13/2015 AUTO GRAPHICS OF ENGLAND 0.00 762.72 762.72 AP 00358246 05/13/2015 BANUELOS,SHIRLEY 29.00 0.00 29.00 AP 00358247 05/13/2015 BARBEE,ROSE 12.00 0.00 12.00 AP 00358248 05/13/2015 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,428.11 0.00 1,428.11 AP 00358249 05/13/2015 BAUER COMPRESSORS 0.00 6,120.54 6,120.54 AP 00358250 05/13/2015 BELTRAN,OSBALDO ALVARADO 432.00 0.00 432.00 • AP 00358251 05/13/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 3,305.72 88.57 3,394.29*** AP 00358252 05/13/2015 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN 2,235.28 0.00 2,235.28 AP 00358253 05/13/2015 BRIGGS,APRIL 47.00 0.00 47.00 AP 00358254 05/13/2015 BUCHIIOLTZ,MATTHEW 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00358255 05/13/2015 CABLE INC. 4,369.86 0.00 4,369.86 AP 00358256 05/13/2015 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 248.21 . 0.00 248.21 AP 00358257 05/13/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 165.53 0.00 165.53 AP 00358258 05/13/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00358259 05/13/2015 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 51.56 51.56 AP 00358260 05/13/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 0.00 1,415.00 1,415.00 AP 00358261 05/13/2015 CDW-G 1,461.14 999.73 2,460.87*** AP 00358262 05/13/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4.61 0.00 4.61 AP 00358263 05/13/2015 CLEAR COAST RESTORATION 0.00 54,467.11 54,467.11 AP 00358264 05/13/2015 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 268.78 0.00 268.78 AP 00358265 05/13/2015 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP 7,530.22 0.00 7,530.22 AP 00358266 05/13/2015 CUCAMONGA JUMPERS 280.00 0.00 280.00 AP 00358267 05/13/2015 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 26,180.00 0.00 26,180.00 AP 00358268 05/13/2015 DAVIES,LES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00358269 05/13/2015 DEAN,TRACY 16.10 0.00 16.10 AP 00358270 05/13/2015 DELTA DENTAL 1,578.76 0.00 1,578.76 AP 00358271 05/13/2015 DELTA DENTAL 40,937.47 0.00 40,937.47 AP 00358272 05/13/2015 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 115.00 0.00 115.00 AP 00358273 05/13/2015 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,698.00 0.00 2,698.00 AP 00358274 05/13/2015 DREAM SHAPERS 200.00 0.00 200.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358275 05/13/2015 DUCHARME,DENISE 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00358276 05/13/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 0.00 1,309.10 1,309.10 AP 00358277 05/13/2015 E GROUP,THE 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00358278 05/13/2015 EDWARDS,STEFANIE 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00358279 05/13/2015 EGGLESTON,WILHELMINA 27.00 0.00 27.00 AP 00358280 05/13/2015 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER&HARRIS L.L.P. 1,254.00 0.00 1,254.00 AP 00358281 05/13/2015 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 24,662.00 0.00 24,662.00 AP 00358282 05/13/2015 ENTERSECT CORP 234.01 0.00 234.01 AP 00358283 05/13/2015 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00358284 05/13/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 73.51 0.00 73.51 AP 00358285 05/13/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 354.07 354.07 AP 00358286 05/13/2015 GENTRY BROS INC 14,478.05 0.00 14,478.05 AP 00358287 05/13/2015 GEOGRAPHICS 4,714.20 0.00 4,714.20 AP 00358288 05/13/2015 GLOBALSTAR 149.20 • 0.00 149.20 AP 00358289 05/13/2015 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCT'S 592.92 0.00 592.92 AP 00358290 05/13/2015 GONZALES,ANTOINETTE 58.08 0.00 58.08 AP 00358291 05/13/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 962.49 0.00 962.49 AP 00358292 05/13/2015 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 0.00 2,250.00 AP 00358293 05/13/2015 GRAYBAR 1,754.62 0.00 1,754.62 AP 00358294 05/13/2015 H&H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 611,933.65 0.00 611,933.65 AP 00358295 05/13/2015 HDL COREN AND CONE 4,200.00 0.00 4,200.00 AP 00358296 05/13/2015 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 292.00 0.00 292.00 AP 00358297 05/13/2015 HERMANN,ANDREA R. 1,785.00 0.00 1,785.00 AP 00358298 05/13/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 296.30 0.00 296.30 AP 00358299 05/13/2015 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 220.90 0.00 220.90 AP 00358300 05/13/2015 HOYT LUMBER CO.,SM 0.00 83.32 83.32 AP 00358301 05/13/2015 HUERTA,BIANY 475.00 0.00 475.00 AP 00358302 05/13/2015 I A A P CALIFORNIA DIVISION . 166.00 0.00 166.00 AP 00358303 05/13/2015 INLAND BODY AND PAINT CENTER 2,131.36 0.00 2,131.36 AP 00358304 05/13/2015 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 1,579.50 0.00 1,579.50 AP 00358305 05/13/2015 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 1,984.45 0.00 1,984.45 AP 00358306 05/13/2015 JOSH CHANG MUSIC 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00358307 05/13/2015 JRC HOUSING 6,443.00 0.00 6,443.00 AP 00358308 05/13/2015 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 181,736.35 0.00 181,736.35 AP 00358309 05/13/2015 KINETIC LIGHTING INC 292.89 0.00 292.89 AP 00358310 05/13/2015 KRONOS INC 0.00 215.00 215.00 AP 00358311 05/13/2015 LEAL,RUTH 100.80 0.00 100.80 AP 00358312 05/13/2015 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 895.50 0.00 895.50 AP 00358313 05/13/2015 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00358314 05/13/2015 LITTLEJOHN,SACHA 27.00 0.00 . 27.00 AP 00358318 05/13/2015 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8,451.42 5,089.22 13,540.64*** AP 00358319 05/13/2015 MAG-IBA,LINA 14.00 0.00 14.00 AP 00358320 05/13/2015 MANOCCHI,VINCENT MICHAEL 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00358321 05/13/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 1,373.90 0.00 1,373.90 AP 00358322 05/13/2015 MARTIN,PETER 74.46 0.00 74.46 AP 00358323 05/13/2015 MC TRUCKING 1,629.05 0.00 1,629.05 AP 00358324 05/13/2015 MCMAST'ER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 119.98 0.00 119.98 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P3 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358325 05/13/2015 MEDINA. BREANNA 0.00 81.93 81.93 AP 00358326 05/13/2015 MET'ROLINK 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 AP 00358327 05/13/2015 MIAU.ALBERT 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00358328 05/13/2015 MOMS CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-WEST 61.00 0.00 61.00 AP 00358329 05/13/2015 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.11 0.00 10.11 AP 00358330 05/13/2015 NATIONAL DATA&SURVEYING SERVICES 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00358331 05/13/2015 NEW COLOR SCREEN PRINTING&EMBROIDERY 145.80 0.00 145.80 AP 00358332 05/13/2015 NEW COVENANT CHRISTIAN CENTER 182.00 0.00 182.00 AP 00358333 05/13/2015 NEXTEL 0.00 164.97 164.97 AP 00358334 05/13/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 5,692.50 165.56 5,858.06*4* AP 00358335 05/13/2015 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 1,612.80 0.00 1,612.80 AP 00358336 05/13/2015 ONTARIO,CITY OF 14,946.69 0.00 14,946.69 AP 00358337 05/13/2015 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS INC 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00358338 05/13/2015 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00358339 05/13/2015 PATTON SALES CORD 169.60 0.00 169.60 AP 00358340 05/13/2015 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00358341 05/13/2015 PETERSEN,CHARLES 36.00 0.00 36.00 AP 00358342 05/13/2015 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS - 988.74 0.00 988.74 AP 00358343 05/13/2015 PINCOTF,CARRIE 62.14 0.00 62.14 AP 00358344 05/13/2015 POLITICAL DATA INC 1,236.83 0.00 1,236.83 AP 00358345 05/13/2015 POWER PLAY YOUTH ATHLETICS 936.00 0.00 936.00 AP 00358346 05/13/2015 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 84.24 0.00 84.24 AP 00358347 05/13/2015 PRIME GLASS 235.47 0.00 235.47 AP 00358348 05/13/2015 puLTE HOMES CORI' 4,218.91 0.00 4,218.91 AP 00358349 05/13/2015 QUALI'T'Y TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 0.00 750.60 750.60 AP 00358350 05/13/2015 RAMIREZ,JOSE.' 878.00 0.00 878.00 AP 00358351 05/13/2015 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 125.28 0.00 125.28 AP 00358352 05/13/2015 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 163.10 0.00 163.10 AP 00358353 05/13/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 2,909.52 0.00 2,909.52 AP 00358354 05/13/2015 RESCUE RESPONSE GEAR LLC 0.00 314.04 314.04 AP 00358355 05/13/2015 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,003,46 4,385.67 9,389.13*** AP 00358356 05/13/2015 RIPPETOE LAW I'C 12,327.14 0.00 12,327.14 AP 00358357 05/13/2015 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 639.27 0.00 639.27 AP 00358358 05/13/2015 RODRIGUEZ,EUGENIO 3,666.00 0.00 3,666.00 AP 00358359 05/13/2015 ROGERS ANDERSON MALODY&SCOTT LLP 8,925.00 0.00 8,925.00 AP 00358360 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 242.28 0.00 242.28 AP 00358361 05/13/2015 SAN 1ERNARDINO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS 1,081.32 0.00 1,081.32 AP 00358362 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 16,037.46 0.00 16,037.46 AP 00358363 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE EMS OFFICERS 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00358364 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DISTRICT 0.00 290.00 290.00 AP 00358365 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO,CITY OF 957.22 0.00 957.22 AP 00358366 05/13/2015 SBPEA 848.15 0.00 848.15 AP 00358367 05/13/2015 SCOTT,APRIL 243.00 0.00 243.00 AP 00358368 05/13/2015 SEXTON,SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00358369 05/13/2015 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTATION 300.85 0.00 300.85 AP 00358370 05/13/2015 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTATION 159.55 0.00 159.55 AP 00358371 05/13/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p4 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358372 05/13/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00358373 05/13/2015 SHOETERIA 1,111.12 0.00 1,111.12 AP 00358374 05/13/2015 SNAP ON INDUSTRIAL 0.00 7,939.86 7,939.86 AP 00358375 05/13/2015 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 6,160.00 0.00 6,160.00 AP 00358380 05/13/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51,595.87 1,643.02 53,238.89"' AP 00358381 05/13/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,707.41 0.00 2,707.41 AP 00358382 05/13/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 963.45 0.00 963.45 AP 00358383 05/13/2015 SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 311.00 0.00 311.00 Al' 00358384 05/13/2015 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 552.00 0.00 552.00 AP 00358385 05/13/2015 SPINDOLA,BEDA 334.20 0.00 334.20 AP 00358386 05/13/2015 STEAMX LLC 0.00 191.13 191.13 AP 00358387 05/13/2015 S'T'REAMLINE PRESS INC 0.00 267.84 267.84 AP 00358388 05/13/2015 SUMMIT SECURITY SERVICES INC 0.00 7,983.92 7,983.92 AP 00358389 05/13/2015 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 3,684.40 0.00 3,684.40 AP 00358390 05/13/2015 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 16.20 0.00 16.20 AI' 00358391 05/13/2015 SWIFTY SIGN 1,890.00 0.00 1,890.00 AP 00358392 05/13/2015 SYLVAN LEARNING CENTER 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358393 05/13/2015 SYSCO LOS ANGELES INC 3,980.05 0.00 3,980.05 Al' 00358394 05/13/2015 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 107.00 107.00 AP 00358395 05/13/2015 THEATRICAL LIGHTING& SCENIC SERVICES LLC 168.37 0.00 168.37 AP 00358396 05/13/2015 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 28,960.00 0.00 28,960.00 AP 00358397 05/13/2015 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 780.58 0.00 780.58 AP 00358398 05/13/2015 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 203.36 0.00 203.36 AP 00358399 05/13/2015 UNITED WAY 157.00 0.00 157.00 AP 00358400 05/13/2015 UPS 13.73 0.00 13.73 AP 00358401 05/13/2015 US POST OFFICE 12,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 AP 00358402 05/13/2015 UTILIQUEST 2,444.70 0.00 2,444.70 AP 00358403 05/13/2015 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 2.81 2.81 AP 00358404 05/13/2015 VELDEN.GARY VANDER 68.03 0.00 68.03 AP 00358408 05/13/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 5,040.81 -6.13 5,034.68"' AP 00358409 05/13/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 494.13 0.00 494.13 AP 00358410 05/13/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 232.46 0.00 232.46 AP 00358411 05/13/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 3,999.93 0.00 3,999.93 AP 00358412 05/13/2015 VISION KEEPERS MINISTRY 135.00 0.00 135.00 AP 00358413 05/13/2015 VIVERAE INC 1,150.00 . 0.00 1,150.00 AP 00358414 05/13/2015 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 3.121.05 0.00 3,121.05 AP 00358415 05/13/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2.813.45 237.37 3,050.82 "' AP 00358416 05/13/2015 WE TELL STORIES 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00358417 05/13/2015 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 820.75 0.00 820.75 AP 00358418 05/13/2015 WESTLAND GROUP INC 24,757.50 0.00 24,757.50 AP 00358419 05/13/2015 WIGHT,BILL 249.10 0.00 249.10 AP 00358420 05/13/2015 WINCO FOODS 0.00 70.94 70.94 AP 00358421 05/13/2015 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 1,013.04 0.00 1,013.04 AP 00358422 05/14/2015 JAMEX 2,834.40 0.00 2,834.40 AP 00358423 05/14/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 660.55 0.00 660.55 AP 00358424 05/14/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 869.62 0.00 869.62 AP 00358425 05/14/2015 AUTO BODY 2000 611.62 0.00 611.62 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P5 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/]3/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358426 05/14/2015 COMP U ZONE 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00358429 05/14/2015 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74,478.41 503.77 74,982.18*** AP 00358430 05/14/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 848.55 0.00 848.55 AP 00358431 05/14/2015 FORD OF UPLAND INC 198.35 0.00 198.35 AP 00358432 05/14/2015 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 124.00 0.00 124.00 AP 00358433 05/14/2015 VISTA PAINT 745.37 0.00 745.37 • AP 00358434 05/20/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,128.12 0.00 1,128.12 AP 00358435 05/20/2015 ACTION AWARDS INC. 4,454.76 0.00 4,454.76 AP 00358436 05/20/2015 ACTIVE KIDS IN THE I.E. 2,822.40 0.00 2,822.40 AP 00358437 05/20/2015 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1,313.50 0.00 1,313.50 AP 00358438 05/20/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 6,843.06 0.00 6,843.06 AP 00358439 05/20/2015 ABS 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00358440 05/20/2015 ALAN'S,ALEX 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00358441 05/20/2015 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 184.00 0.00 184.00 AP 00358442 05/20/2015 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 26,597.43 0.00 26,597.43 AP 00358443 05/20/2015 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 1,708.67 1,708.67 AP 00358444 05/20/2015 ALPHAGRAPHICS 255.17 0.00 255.17 AP 00358445 05/20/2015 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 281.07 0.00 281.07 AP 00358446 05/20/2015 ANDREW, MARY 147.75 0.00 147.75 AP 00358447 05/20/2015 APPA 7.255.61 0.00 7,255.61 AP 00358448 05/20/2015 ASIAN-AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00358449 05/20/2015 ASSI SECURITY 3,670.00 0.00 3,670.00 AP 00358450 05/20/2015 AUSTIN,MELVIN 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00358451 05/20/2015 BASELINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00358452 05/20/2015 BELLE'S PRINTING EXPRESS INC. 768.04 0.00 768.04 AP 00358453 05/20/2015 BERGHOEFER,SUSAN 324.00 0.00 324.00 AP 00358454 05/20/2015 BOLTON, HEATHER 971.05 0.00 971.05 AP 00358455 05/20/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 0.00 354.24 354.24 AP 00358456 05/20/2015 CABLE INC. 12,933.50 0.00 12,933.50 Al' 00358457 05/20/2015 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORP 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00358458 05/20/2015 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 84.05 0.00 84.05 AP 00358459 05/20/2015 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 1,768.16 0.00 1,768.16 AP 00358460 05/20/2015 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,020.29 0.00 1,020.29 Al' 00358461 05/20/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 29,373.04 850.00 30,223.04*** AP 00358462 05/20/2015 CIIABAD OF THE INLAND EMPIRE 84.00 0.00 84.00 AP 00358463 05/20/2015 CHAR'I'ER COMMUNICATIONS 130.97 0.00 130.97 AP 00358464 05/20/2015 CINTAS CORP.#150 123.12 0.00 123.12 AP 00358465 05/20/2015 CITYGATE ASSOCIATES LLC 618.19 0.00 618.19 AP 00358466 05/20/2015 CLEAN ENERGY 233.29 0.00 233.29 AP 00358467 05/20/2015 CLEAR COAST RESTORATION 1,200.00 2,335.00 3,535.00*** AP 00358468 05/20/2015 COVE SERVICES INC. 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00358469 05/20/2015 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 1,917.00 0.00 1,917.00 AP 00358470 05/20/2015 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00358471 05/20/2015 CONFIRE IPA 0.00 50,254.43 50,254.43 AP 00358472 05/20/2015 CRISTIANA,AMISTAD 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358473 05/20/2015 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 3.000.24 0.00 3,000.24 AP 00358474 05/20/2015 CYCLING CONNECTION 325.00 0.00 325.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P6 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358475 05/20/2015 D&D SERVICES INC. 430.00 0.00 430.00 AP 00358476 05/20/2015 DANCE TERRIFIC 472.50 0.00 472.50 AP 00358477 05/20/2015 DELACRUZ,ALEJANDRA 164.00 0.00 164.00 AP 00358478 05/20/2015 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00358479 05/20/2015 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00358480 05/20/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 0.00 300.00 300.00 AP 00358481 05/20/2015 DUNN,ANN MARIE 189.00 0.00 189.00 • AP 00358482 05/20/2015 E GROUP,THE 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00358483 05/20/2015 E POLY STAR INC. 1,819.80 0.00 1,819.80 Al' 00358484 05/20/2015 EARTHWORKS SOIL AMENDMENTS INC. 3,191.94 0.00 3,191.94 AP 00358485 05/20/2015 EDWARD PROFESSIONAL ADVISIORS 950.00 0.00 950.00 AP 00358486 05/20/2015 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00358487 05/20/2015 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 2,219.66 0.00 2,219.66 Al' 00358488 05/20/2015 EXPLORER POST 501 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 AP 00358489 05/20/2015 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 1,628.44 0.00 1,628.44 AP 00358490 05/20/2015 FIRST VETERINARY SUPPLY 293.12 0.00 293.12 AP 00358491 05/20/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 903.17 903.17 AP 00358492 05/20/2015 FUEL SERV 37.33 0.00 37.33 AP 00358493 05/20/2015 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 6,718.22 0.00 6,718.22 AP 00358494 05/20/2015 GEMPLERS INC 469.25 0.00 469.25 AP 00358495 05/20/2015 GIORDANO,MARIANNA 162.00 0.00 162.00 AP 00358496 05/20/2015 GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 435.00 0.00 435.00 AI' 00358497 05/20/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. . 114.23 0.00 114.23 Al' 00358498 05/20/2015 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 0.00 2,250.00 AP 00358499 05/20/2015 GULF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00358500 05/20/2015 HEDIGER, PATRICK 64.89 0.00 64.89. AP 00358501 05/20/2015 HEILIG,KELLY 1,074.60 0.00 1,074.60 AP 00358502 05/20/2015 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 356.40 0.00 356.40 AP 00358503 05/20/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 2,148.77 0.00 2,148.77 AP 00358504 05/20/2015 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 708.14 0.00 708.14 AP 00358505 05/20/2015 •OYT LUMBER CO.,SM 0.00 12.60 12.60 AI' 00358506 05/20/2015 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY IN' 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00358507 05/20/2015 IBM CORPORATION 225.57 0.00 225.57 AP 00358508 05/20/2015 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATION 1,986.75 0.00 1,986.75 AP 00358509 05/20/2015 INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 4,308.02 0.00 4,308.02 AP 00358510 05/20/2015 INTERVET INC 4,077.00 0.00 4,077.00 AP 00358511 05/20/2015 J C CHANG&ASSOCIATES INC 1,232.00 0.00 1,232.00 AP 00358512 05/20/2015 JACKSON HIRSII INC 531.03 0.00 531.03 AP 00358513 05/20/2015 JDC INC 22,347.00 0.00 22,347.00 AP 00358514 05/20/2015 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 3,216.51 0.00 3,216.51 AP 00358515 05/20/2015 JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 560.61 0.00 560.61 AP 00358516 05/20/2015 KENT HARRIS TRUCKING&MATERIALS 332.80 0.00 332.80 AP 00358517 05/20/2015 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC 138,292.68 0.00 138,292.68 AP 00358518 05/20/2015 LANGUAGE I'LANET 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00358519 05/20/2015 LANTAI,KRIS 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00358520 05/20/2015 LAWMEN SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 1,555.20 1,555.20 AP 00358521 05/20/2015 LENOVO(UNITED STATES)INC. 128.34 0.00 128.34 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ • Page: 6 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358522 05/20/2015 LEW EDWARDS GROUP,THE 5,750.00 0.00 5,750.00 AP 00358523 05/20/2015 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 163.20 163.20 AP 00358524 05/20/2015 LIGHTHOUSE,THE 2,067.12 0.00 2,067.12 AP 00358525 05/20/2015 LIONS SHARE REALTY 36.37 0.00 36.37 AP 00358526 05/20/2015 LI'IiLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00358527 05/20/2015 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 457.20 0.00 457.20 AP 00358528 05/20/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 3,116.08 0.00 3,116.08 AP 00358529 05/20/2015 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 227.20 0.00 227.20 AP 00358530 05/20/2015 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 1,949.84 0.00 1,949.84 AP 00358531 05/20/2015 MCCALL,RAY 925.00 0.00 925.00 AP 00358532 05/20/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 383.68 0.00 383.68 AP 00358533 05/20/2015 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 940.00 0.00 940.00 AP 00358534 05/20/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 7.99 0.00 7.99 AP 00358535 05/20/2015 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 124.00 485.00 609.00'•• AP 00358536 05/20/2015 MILANES,YIKCIA 275.00 0.00 275.00 AP 00358537 05/20/2015 MIRION TECHNOLOGIES GDS INC 294.03 0.00 294.03 AP 00358538 05/20/2015 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US INC 626.95 0.00 626.95 AP 00358539 05/20/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW PAINTBALL 2,441.88 0.00 2,441.88 AP 00358540 05/20/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 543.42 0.00 543.42 AP 00358541 05/20/2015 MR CHEF HOB LLC 120.70 0.00 120.70 AP 00358542 05/20/2015 N-III INCORPORATED 1.133.40 0.00 1,133.40 AP 00358543 05/20/2015 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.58 0.00 21.58 AP 00358544 05/20/2015 NEXGEN 411.22 0.00 411.22 AP 00358545 05/20/2015 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 2,517.50 2,517.50 AP 00358546 05/20/2015 OCLC INC 50.45 0.00 50.45 AP 00358547 05/20/2015 OFFICEDEPOT 4,120.97 0.00 4,120.97 AP 00358549 05/20/2015 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEU'T'ER INC 2,250.00 0.00 2,250.00 AP 00358550 05/20/2015 OROZCO,JOE 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00358551 05/20/2015 PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING 1,036.00 0.00 1,036.00 AP 00358552 05/20/2015 PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS 9,595.00 0.00 9,595.00 AP 00358553 05/20/2015 PACIFIC YOUTH SPORTS 2,604.00 0.00 2,604.00 AP 00358554 05/20/2015 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00358555 05/20/2015 PENNYSAVER USA PUBLISHING LLC 779.67 0.00 779.67 AP 00358556 05/20/2015 PEP BOYS 162.55 0.00 162.55 AP 00358557 05/20/2015 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 1,927.81 0.00 1,927.81 AP 00358558 05/20/2015 PONTO&SONS WHOLESALE 152.74 0.00 152.74 AP 00358559 05/20/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 2.328.76 0.00 2,328.76 AP 00358560 05/20/2015 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 0.00 318,804.80 318,804.80 AI' 00358561 05/20/2015 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 4.253.55 0.00 4,253.55 AP 00358562 05/20/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUND. 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00358563 05/20/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUND. 6,422.00 0.00 6,422.00 AP 00358564 05/20/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 9,984.47 0.00 9,984.47 AP 00358565 05/20/2015 REALITY COMMUNITY CHURCH 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00358566 05/20/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 2,037.96 0.00 2,037.96 AP 00358567 05/20/2015 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 248.29 0.00 248.29 AP 00358568 05/20/2015 ROBLES,RAUL P 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00358569 05/20/2015 RODRIGUEZ INC,RY 216.00 0.00 216.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P8 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358570 05/20/2015 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00358571 05/20/2015 ROTO ROOTER 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00358572 05/20/2015 RUIZ,ROBIN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358573 05/20/2015 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 1,535.05 1,535.05 AP 00358574 05/20/2015 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 2,484.00 0.00 2,484.00 AP 00358575 05/20/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 278.80 0.00 278.80 AP 00358576 05/20/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER REC( 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00358577 05/20/2015 SC FUELS 34,571.84 3,647.33 38,219.17*** AP 00358578 05/20/2015 SHRED IT 319.55 0.00 319.55 AP 00358579 05/20/2015 SHRED PROS 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00358580 05/20/2015 SMARTLITE 395.00 0.00 395.00 AP 00358581 05/20/2015 SOCAL.OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 0.00 6,063.98 6,063.98 AP 00358582 05/20/2015 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 205.58 0.00 205.58 AP 00358586 05/20/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,330.29 0.00 9,330.29 AP 00358587 05/20/2015 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,377.01 0.00 1,377.01 AP 00358588 05/20/2015 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 26.33 26.33 AP 00358589 05/20/2015 SWIFTY SIGN 97.20 0.00 97.20 AP 00358590 05/20/2015 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00358591 05/20/2015 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 1,251.97 0.00 1,251.97 AP 00358592 05/20/2015 TICKETS.COM 1,070.78 0.00 1,070.78 AP 00358593 05/20/2015 TJ'S FLOOR COVERING SUPPLIES INC 534.64 0.00 534.64 AP 00358594 05/20/2015 TORO TOWING 325.00 0.00 325.00 AP 00358595 05/20/2015 TREBOR SHORING RENTAL 0.00 4,692.60 4,692.60 AP 00358596 05/20/2015 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 100.79 0.00 100.79 AP 00358597 05/20/2015 TUMBLEWEED PRESS INC 838.60 0.00 838.60 AP 00358598 05/20/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 15,057.73 0.00 15,057.73 AP 00358599 05/20/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT-#6746022500 1,000.82 0.00 1,000.82 AP 00358600 05/20/2015 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 319.50 0.00 319.50 AP 00358601 05/20/2015 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 19.682.00 0.00 19,682.00 AP 00358602 05/20/2015 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 451.82 0.00 451.82 AP 00358603 05/20/2015 URIBE,JONATHAN 0.00 130.00 130.00 AP 00358604 05/20/2015 UTILIQUEST 2,402.55 0.00 2,402.55 AP 00358605 05/20/2015 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00358606 05/20/2015 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 163.93 0.00 163.93 AP 00358607 05/20/2015 VEND U COMPANY 241.27 0.00 241.27 AP 00358608 05/20/2015 Verizon 37.71 0.00 37.71 AP 00358609 05/20/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 1,189.67 0.00 1,189.67 AP 00358611 05/20/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 6,726.70 1.329.10 8,055.80*** AP 00358612 05/20/2015 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 3.921.64 0.00 3,921.64 AP 00358613 05/20/2015 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358614 05/20/2015 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 2,038.00 0.00 2,038.00 AP 00358615 05/20/2015 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,546.07 3,354.05 4,900.12*** AP 00358616 05/20/2015 WARREN&CO INC,CARL 229.03 0.00 229.03 AP 00358617 05/20/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,223.18 0.00 2,223.18 AP 00358618 05/20/2015 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 515.00 0.00 515.00 AP 00358619 05/20/2015 WONG, DAVID 298.50 0.00 298.50 AP 00358620 05/20/2015 YOURMEMBERSHIP.COM INC 30.00 0.00 30.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p9 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358621 05/20/2015 ZHANG,MATTHEW 115.00 0.00 115.00 AP 00358622 05/21/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,001.56 0.00 1,001.56 AP 00358623 05/21/2015 AGILINE LLC 3,050.00 0.00 3,050.00 AP 00358625 05/21/2015 BRODART BOOKS 2,491.01 0.00 2,491.01 AP 00358626 05/21/2015 CALSENSE 2,393.62 0.00 2,393.62 AP 00358627 05/21/2015 COMP U ZONE 1,678.02 0.00 1,678.02 AP 00358629 05/21/2015 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 60,862.01 337.91 61,199.92*** AP 00358630 05/21/2015 EMCOR SERVICE 32,513.00 0.00 32,513.00 AP 00358631 05/21/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 503.39 0.00 503.39 AP 00358632 05/21/2015 FASTENAL COMPANY 1,477.30 0.00 1,477.30 AP 00358633 05/21/2015 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 6,028.69 0.00 6,028.69 AP 00358634 05/21/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 5,690.03 0.00 5,690.03 AP 00358635 05/21/2015 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,155.00 0.00 1,155.00 AP 00358636 05/21/2015 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 320.19 320.19 AP 00358637 05/21/2015 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 48,394.27 48,394.27 AP 00358638 05/21/2015 LIMS AUTO INC 1,989.92 0.00 1,989.92 AP 00358639 05/21/2015 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 429.71 429.71 AP 00358640 05/21/2015 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 4,276.00 0.00 4,276.00 AP 00358641 05/21/2015 PENNY PLUMBING 3,975.89 0.00 3,975.89 AP 00358642 05/21/2015 TOMARK SPORTS INC 2,192.85 0.00 2,192.85 AP 00358643 05/21/2015 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,005.00 0.00 1,005.00 AP 00358644 05/21/2015 VISTA PAINT 2,236.12 0.00 2,236.12 EP 00005211 05/13/2015 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,320.00 0.00 9,320.00 EP 00005212 05/13/2015 EXELON GENERATION CO.LLC. 275,987.40 0.00 275,987.40 EP 00005213 05/13/2015 RCCEA 1,336.00 0.00 1,336.00 EP 00005214 05/13/2015 RCPFA 10,449.56 0.00 10,449.56 EP 00005215 05/13/2015 RIVERSIDE,CITY OF 6,294.00 0.00 6,294.00 EP 00005216 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 21.00 0.00 21.00 EP 00005217 05/13/2015 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 13,140.00 0.00 13,140.00 EP 00005218 05/13/2015 VIASYN INC 2,250.66 0.00 2,250.66 EP 00005220 05/20/2015 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 94,765.93 0.00 94,765.93 EP 00005221 05/20/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY 880.32 0.00 880.32 EP 00005222 05/20/2015 TED KURLAND ASSOCIATES 2,790.00 0.00 2,790.00 Total City: $2,685,627.08 Total Fire: $563,005.52 Grand Total: $3,248,632.60 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures • User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 0 STAFF REPORT - PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2015 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 002 EXTENDING THE TERM OF CONTRACT CO 13-210 WITH COMMERCIAL CLEANING SYSTEMS (CCS) OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA TO JUNE 30, 2016, INCLUDING A FEE INCREASE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2016, FOR CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $500,000 FOR CITY AND $50,000 FOR FIRE DISTRICT TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304 (FACILITIES MAINTENANCE), 1700312-5304 (SPORTS COMPLEX), AND 3281529-5300 (FIRE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE) CONTINGENT UPON THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FY 2015-2016; AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE TO ADJUST THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND SPENDING LIMIT OF SAID CONTRACTS IN THE FUTURE, ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JANITORIAL SERVICE BUDGET LINE 5304 AND FIRE DISTRICT JANITORIAL SERVICE BUDGET LINE 5300; AND TO RENEW SAID CONTRACTS UPON MUTUAL CONSENT OF CITY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CONTRACTOR FOR ONE (1) YEAR PERIODS UP TO AN ADDITIONAL FOUR (4) YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2020 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 002 extending the term of contract CO 13-210 with Commercial Cleaning Systems (CCS) of Costa Mesa, California to June 30, 2016, including a fee increase effective January 1, 2016, for Citywide Janitorial Services in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for City and $50,000 for Fire District to be funded from 1001312-5304 (Facilities Maintenance), 1700312-5304 (Sports Complex), and 3281529-5300 (Fire Facilities Maintenance) contingent upon the adopted budget for FY 2015-2016; authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contracts in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department janitorial service budget line 5304 and Fire District janitorial service budget line 5300; and to renew said contracts upon mutual consent of City, Fire District and Contractor for one (1) year periods up to an additional four (4) years ending June 30, 2020. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council approved a competitively bid contract, CO 13-210, with Commercial Cleaning Systems (CCS) of Costa Mesa, California on August 21, 2013. CCS has submitted a Letter of Intent to renew the contract for FY 2015-2016 and is requesting a nine percent increase in contract rates effective January 1, 2016. Subsequent to CCS entering into this contract, Assembly Bill 10 was approved by the Legislature and signed by the Governor on September 25, 2013. AB 10 increases the minimum wage in California from $9.00 per hour to not less than $10.00 per hour effective January 1, 2016. As the cleaning crews consist predominantly of minimum wage earners, this State mandated wage hike will increase , • APPROVE AMENDMENT 002 TO CONTRACT CO 13-210 WITI-I COMMERCIAL CLEANING SYSTEMS P11 EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT TO JUNE 30,2020 JUNE 3,2015 PAGE Two CCS' direct labor costs to provide janitorial services approximately eleven percent for the second half of FY 2015-2016. The requested fee increase is to mitigate these increased labor costs. Commercial Cleaning Systems has provided an acceptable level of service during the term of this contract. Therefore staff recommends the Council authorize a one-year contract extension for fiscal year 2015-2016 and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit and to renew said contract for one (1) year periods up to an additional four (4) years ending June 30, 2020. Respectfully submitted, E/lickiiept‘ William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director BW:TQ/pf • STAFF REPORT P12 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT ` _� Date: June 3, 2015 ))} , RA NC HO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council R. Gillison, City Manager CUCAMIONGA From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 003 WITH MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA EXTENDING THE TERM OF CONTRACT CO 89- 136 TO JUNE 30, 2016 WITH MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SCOPE OF WORK IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $398,700 IN FY 2015-2016; APPROVE AMENDMENT 003 EXTENDING THE TERM OF CONTRACT CO 90-145 TO JUNE 30, 2016 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $625,150 IN FY 2015-2016; APPROVE AMENDMENT 006 EXTENDING THE TERM OF CONTRACT CO 93-006 TO JUNE 30, 2016 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $827,350 FOR CITY FACILITIES AND $70,200 FOR FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES IN FY 2015-2016; FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKS, ARCHIBALD LIBRARY, COUNTY WASH ENDS, AND CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE SITES, WITH NO FEE INCREASES FOR CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES; CONTINGENT ON THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FY 2015-2016, TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS GENERAL, SPECIAL AND FIRE FUND ACCOUNTS; AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE TO ADJUST THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND SPENDING LIMIT OF SAID CONTRACTS IN THE FUTURE, ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BUDGET LINE 5300 AND FIRE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BUDGET LINE 5300; AND TO RENEW SAID CONTRACTS UPON MUTUAL CONSENT OF CITY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CONTRACTOR FOR ONE (1) YEAR PERIODS UP TO AN ADDITIONAL TWO (2) YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Fire District Board of Directors approve Amendment 003 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. of Irwindale, California extending the term of contract CO 89-136 to June 30, 2016 with minor adjustments to the scope of work in an amount not to exceed $398,700 in FY 2015-2016; approve Amendment 003 extending the term of contract CO 90-145 to June 30, 2016 in an amount not to exceed $625,150 in FY 2015-2016; approve Amendment 006 extending the term of contract CO 93-006 to June 30, 2016, adding additional landscape sites to the scope of work, in an amount not to exceed $827,350 for City facilities and $70,200 for Fire District facilities in FY 2015- 2016; for the maintenance of City parks, Archibald Library, County wash ends, and City and Fire District landscape sites, with no fee increases for City and Fire District facilities; contingent on the adopted budget for FY 2015-2016, to be funded from various General, Special and Fire Fund accounts; authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contracts in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department landscape maintenance budget line 5300 and Fire District landscape maintenance budget line 5300; and to renew said contracts upon mutual consent of City, Fire District and Contractor for one (1) year periods up to an additional two (2) years ending June 30, 2018. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: CONTRACT RENEWALS FOR CO 89-136,CO 90-145 AND CO 93-006 WPCI-I MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES,INC. P13 June 3, 2015 Page 2 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Mariposa is one of three landscape contractors used by the City to provide maintenance services at various landscape sites citywide. The City Council has previously awarded contracts (CO 89-136, CO 90-145 and CO 93-006) to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. Mariposa has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a minor adjustment to the scope of work and no fee increase for City and Fire District facilities. Mariposa has consistently provided good service during the term of these contracts. Therefore, staff recommends Council authorize one year contract extensions with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. including the minor adjustments to the Scope of Work and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit and to renew said contracts for additional one (1) year periods ending June 30, 2018. Respectfully submitted, talkalf William Wittkopf Mike Costello Public Works Services Director Fire Chief WW:DR/pf CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P14 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358228 05/13/2015 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 162.40 0.00 162.40 AP 00358229 05/13/2015 A AND RTIRE SERVICE 793.21 0.00 793.21 AP 00358230 05/13/2015 A&V SOFTBALL 2,781.00 0.00 2,781.00 AP 00358231 05/13/2015 A.Y.NURSERY INC. 1,809.00 0.00 1,809.00 AP 00358232 05/13/2015 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 122.16 ' 0.00 122.16 AP 00358233 05/13/2015 ACTION AWARDS INC. 69.01 0.00 69.01 AP 00358234 05/13/2015 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 14.175.00 0.00 14,175.00 AP 00358235 05/13/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00358236 05/13/2015 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT-SERVICES INC. 39,639.00 0.00 39,639.00 AP 00358237 05/13/2015 ALLERGY&ASTHMA CENTER 38,659.50 0.00 38,659.50 AP 00358238 05/13/2015 AL.LSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 16,299.21 16,299.21 AP 00358239 05/13/2015 ALVORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358240 05/13/2015 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 223.71 0.00 223.71 AP 00358241 05/13/2015 ARANA,JONATHON 613.20 0.00 613.20 AP 00358242 05/13/2015 ARREDONDO, ROMONA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00358243 05/13/2015 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 41.74 41.74 AP 00358244 05/13/2015 AUFBAU CORPORATION 8,740.00 0.00 8,740.00 AP 00358245 05/13/2015 AUTO GRAPHICS OF ENGLAND 0.00 762.72 762.72 AP 00358246 05/13/2015 BANUELOS.SHIRLEY 29.00 0.00 29.00 AP 00358247 05/13/2015 BARBEE. ROSE 12.00 0.00 12.00 AP 00358248 05/13/2015 BARNES AND NOBLE 1,428.11 0.00 1,428.11 AP 00358249 05/13/2015 BAUER COMPRESSORS '0.00 6,120.54 6,120.54 AP 00358250 05/13/2015 BELTRAN,OSBALDO ALVARADO 432.00 0.00 432.00 AP 00358251 05/13/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL L.LC. 3,305.72 88.57 3,394.29*** AP 00358252 05/13/2015 BRAUN BL-AISING MCLAUGHLIN 2.235.28 0.00 2,235.28 AP 00358253 05/13/2015 BRIGGS,APRIL 47.00 0.00 '47.00 AP 00358254 05/13/2015 BUCHHOLTZ,MA'T'THEW 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00358255 05/13/2015 CABLE INC. 4.369.86 0.00 4,369.86 AP 00358256 05/13/2015 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 248.21 0.00 248.21 AP 00358257 05/13/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 165.53 0.00 165.53 AP 00358258 05/13/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00358259 05/13/2015 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 51.56 51.56 AP 00358260 05/13/2015 CCS ORANGE.COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 0.00 1,415.00 1,415.00 AP 00358261 05/13/2015 CDW-G 1.461.14 999.73 2,460.87*** AP 00358262 05/13/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4.61 0.00 4.61 AP 00358263 05/13/2015 CLEAR COAST RESTORATION 0.00 54,467.11 54,467.11 AP 00358264 05/13/2015 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 268.78 0.00 268.78 AP 00358265 05/13/2015 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP 7,530.22 0.00 7,530.22 AP 00358266 05/13/2015 CUCAMONGA JUMPERS 280.00 0.00 280.00 AP 00358267 05/13/2015 DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES 26,180.00 0.00 26,180.00 AP 00358268 05/13/2015 DAVIES,LES ' 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00358269 05/13/2015 DEAN,TRACY 16.10 0.00 16.10 AP 00358270 05/13/2015 DELTA DENIAL 1,578.76 0.00 1,578.76 AP 00358271 05/13/2015 DELTA DENIAL 40,937.47 0.00 40,937.47 AP 00358272 05/13/2015 DEPARTMENT.OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 115.00 0.00 115.00 AP 00358273 05/13/2015 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,698.00 0.00 2,698.00 AP 00358274 05/13/2015 DREAM SHAPERS 200.00 0.00 200.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P15 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount Al' 00358275 05/13/2015 DUCHARME, DENISE 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00358276 05/13/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 0.00 1,309.10 1,309.10 AP 00358277 05/13/2015 E GROUP,THE 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00358278 05/13/2015 EDWARDS,STEFANIE 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00358279 05/13/2015 EGGLESTON, WILHELMINA 27.00 0.00 27.00 AP 00358280 05/13/2015 ELLISON-SCHNEIDER&HARRIS L.L.I'. 1,254.00 0.00 1,254.00 AP 00358281 05/13/2015 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 24,662.00 0.00 24,662.00 AP 00358282 05/13/2015 ENTERSECT CORP 234.01 0.00 234.01 Al' 00358283 05/13/2015 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00358284 05/13/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 73.51 0.00 73.51 AP 00358285 05/13/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 354.07 354.07 AP 00358286 05/13/2015 GENTRY BROS INC 14,478.05 0.00 14,478.05 AP 00358287 05/13/2015 GEOGRAPHICS 4,714.20 0.00 4,714.20 AP 00358288 05/13/2015 GLOI3ALSTAR 149.20 0.00 149.20 AP 00358289 05/13/2015 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 592.92 0.00 592.92 AP 00358290 05/13/2015 GONZALES,ANTOIN ETTE 58.08 0.00 58.08 AP 00358291 05/13/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 962.49 0.00 962.49 AP 00358292 05/13/2015 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 0.00 2,250.00 AP 00358293 05/13/2015 GRAYBAR 1,754.62 0.00 1,754.62 AP 00358294 05/13/2015 TI&II GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 611.933.65 0.00 611,933.65 AP 00358295 05/13/2015 HDL COREN AND CONE 4,200.00 0.00 4,200.00 Al' 00358296 05/13/2015 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 292.00 0.00 292.00 AP 00358297 05/13/2015 HERMANN,ANDREA R. 1,785.00 0.00 1,785.00 AP 00358298 05/13/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 296.30 0.00 296.30 AP 00358299 05/13/2015 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 220.90 0.00 220.90 AP 00358300 05/13/2015 HOYT LUMBER CO..SM 0.00 83.32 83.32 AP 00358301 05/13/2015 HUERTA,BIANY 475.00 0.00 475.00 AP 00358302 05/13/2015 I A A P CALIFORNIA DIVISION 166.00 0.00 166.00 AP 00358303 05/13/2015 INLAND BODY AND PAINT CENTER 2,131.36 0.00 2,131.36 AP 00358304 05/13/2015 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 1,579.50 0.00 1,579.50 AP 00358305 05/13/2015 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 1,984.45 0.00 1,984.45 AP 00358306 05/13/2015 JOSH CHANG MUSIC 1,200.00 0.00 1.200.00 AP 00358307 05/13/2015 JRC HOUSING 6,443.00 0.00 6,443.00 AP 00358308 05/13/2015 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 181,736.35 0.00 181,736.35 AP 00358309 05/13/2015 KINETIC LIGHTING INC 292.89 0.00 292.89 AP 00358310 05/13/2015 KRONOS INC 0.00 215.00 215.00 AP 00358311 05/13/2015 LEAL.RUTH 100.80 0.00 100.80 AP 00358312 05/13/2015 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 895.50 0.00 895.50 AP 00358313 05/13/2015 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00358314 05/13/2015 LITTLEJOHN,SACHA 27.00 0.00 27.00 AP 00358318 05/13/2015 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 8,451.42 5,089.22 13,540.64*** AP 00358319 05/13/2015 MAG-113A, LINA 14.00 0.00 14.00 AP 00358320 05/13/2015 MANOCCHI, VINCENT MICHAEL 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00358321 05/13/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 1,373.90 0.00 1,373.90 AP 00358322 05/13/2015 MARTIN, PETER 74.46 0.00 74.46 AP 00358323 05/13/2015 MC TRUCKING 1,629.05 0.00 1,629.05 AP 00358324 05/13/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 119.98 0.00 119.98 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P16 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358325 05/13/2015 MEDINA, BREANNA 0.00 81.93 81.93 AP 00358326 05/13/2015 METROLINK 200,000.00 0.00 200.000.00 AP 00358327 05/13/2015 MIAU,ALBERT 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00358328 05/13/2015 MOMS CLUB 01'RANCHO CUCAMONGA-WEST 61.00 0.00 61.00 A!' 00358329 05/13/2015 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.11 0.00 10.11 AP 00358330 05/13/2015 NATIONAL DATA&SURVEYING SERVICES 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00358331 05/13/2015 NEW COLOR SCREEN PRINTING&EMBROIDERY 145.80 0.00 145.80 AP 00358332 05/13/2015 NEW COVENANT CHRISTIAN CENTER 182.00 0.00 182.00 AP 00358333 05/13/2015 NEXTEL 0.00 164.97 164.97 AP 00358334 05/13/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 5.692.50 165.56 5,858.06*** AP 00358335 05/13/2015 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 1.612.80 0.00 1,612.80 AP 00358336 05/13/2015 ONTARIO.CITY OF 14,946.69 0.00 14,946.69 AP 00358337 05/13/2015 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS INC 750.00 0.00 750,00 AP 00358338 05/13/2015 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00358339 05/13/2015 PATrON SALES CORP 169.60 0.00 169.60 AP 00358340 05/13/2015 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00358341 05/13/2015 PETERSEN,CHARLES 36.00 0.00 36.00 AP 00358342 05/13/2015 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 988.74 0.00 988.74 AP 00358343 05/13/2015 PINCOTT,CARRIE 62.14 0.00 62.14 AP 00358344 05/13/2015 POLITICAL DATA INC 1,236.83 0.00 1,236.83 AP 00358345 05/13/2015 POWER PLAY YOUTH ATHLETICS 936.00 0.00 936.00 AP 00358346 05/13/2015 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 84.24 0.00 84,24 AP 00358347 05/13/2015 PRIME GLASS 235.47 0.00 235.47 AP 00358348 05/13/2015 PUL FE HOMES CORP 4,218,91 0.00 4,218.91 AP 00358349 05/13/2015 QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 0.00 750.60 750.60 AP 00358350 05/13/2015 RAMIREZ,JOSE J 878.00 0.00 878.00 AP 00358351 05/13/2015 RANCHO REGIONAI,VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 125,28 0.00 125.28 AP 00358352 05/13/2015 121)0 EQUIPMENT CO 163.10 0.00 163.10 AP 00358353 05/13/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 2.909.52 0.00 2,909.52 Al' 00358354 05/13/2015 RESCUE RESPONSE GEAR LI.,C 0.00 314.04 314:04 AP 00358355 05/13/2015 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,003.46 4,385.67 9,389.13 *** AP 00358356 05/13/2015 RIPPE'OE LAW P C 12,327.14 0.00 12,327.14 Al' 00358357 05/13/2015 ROADLINE PRODUCES INC 639.27 0.00 639.27 Al' 00358358 05/13/2015 RODRIGUEZ,EUGENIO 3,666.00 0.00 3,666.00 AP 00358359 05/13/2015 ROGERS ANDERSON MALODY&SCOTT LLP 8,925.00 0.00 8,925.00 AP 00358360 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 242.28 0.00 242.28 AP 00358361 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS 1,081.32 0.00 1,081.32 AP 00358362 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 16,037.46 0.00 16,037.46 AP 00358363 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE EMS OFFICERS 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00358364 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE.DISTRICT 0.00 290.00 290.00 AP 00358365 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO,CITY OF 957.22 0.00 957.22 AP 00358366 05/13/2015 SBPEA 848.15 0.00 848.15 AP 00358367 05/13/2015 SCOTT,APRIL 243.00 0.00 243.00 AP 00358368 05/13/2015 SEXTON.SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00358369 05/13/2015 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTATION 300.85 0.00 300.85 AP 00358370 05/13/2015 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTATION 159.55 0.00 159,55 AP 00358371 05/13/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93,38 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P17 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358372 05/13/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00358373 05/13/2015 SHOET'ERIA 1,111.12 0.00 1,111.12 AP 00358374 05/13/2015 SNAP ON INDUSTRIAL 0.00 7,939.86 7,939.86 AP 00358375 05/13/2015 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 6.160.00 0.00 6,160.00 AP 00358380 05/13/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51,595.87 1,643.02 53,238.89*** AP 00358381 05/13/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.707.41 0.00 2.707.41 AP 00358382 05/13/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 963.45 0.00 963.45 AP 00358383 05/13/2015 SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 311.00 0.00 311.00 AP 00358384 05/13/2015 SOU HLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 552.00 0.00 552.00 AP 00358385 05/13/2015 SPINDOLA, BEDA 334.20 0.00 334.20 AP 00358386 05/13/2015 STEAMX LI.0 0.00 191.13 191.13 AP 00358387 05/13/2015 STREAMLINE PRESS INC 0.00 267.84 267.84 AP 00358388 05/13/2015 SUMMIT SECURITY SERVICES INC 0.00 7,983.92 7,983.92 AP 00358389 05/13/2015 SUNGARI)PUBLIC SECTOR INC 3.684.40 0.00 3,684.40 AP 00358390 05/13/2015 SUNSHINE GROWERS NURSERY INC 16.20 0.00 16.20 AP 00358391 05/13/2015 SWIITY SIGN 1.890.00 0.00 1,890.00 AP 00358392 05/13/2015 SYLVAN LEARNING CENTER 500.00 0.00 500.00 Al' 00358393 05/13/2015 SYSCO LOS ANGELES INC 3,980.05 0.00 3.980.05 AP 00358394 05/13/2015 T ERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 107.00 107.00 AP 00358395 05/13/2015 1IIEATRICAL LIGHTING&SCENIC SERVICES LLC 168.37 0.00 168.37 AP 00358396 05/13/2015 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 28.960.00 0.00 28.960.00 AP 00358397 05/13/2015 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 780.58 0.00 780.58 AP 00358398 05/13/2015 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 203.36 0.00 203.36 AP 00358399 05/13/2015 UNITED WAY 157.00 0.00 157.00 AP 00358400 05/13/2015 UPS 13.73 0.00 13.73 AP 00358401 05/13/2015 US POST OFFICE 12,000.00 0.00 12,000.00 AP 00358402 05/13/2015 UTILIQUEST 2,444.70 0.00 2,444.70 AP 00358403 05/13/2015 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 2.81 2.81 AI' 00358404 05/13/2015 VELDEN,GARY VANDER 68.03 0.00 68.03 AP 00358408 05/13/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- I,A 5,040.81 -6.13 5,034.68*** AP 00358409 05/13/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 494.13 0.00 494.13 AP 00358410 05/13/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 232.46 0.00 232.46 AP 00358411 05/13/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 3,999.93 0.00 3,999.93 AP 00358412 05/13/2015 VISION KEEPERS MINISTRY 135.00 0.00 135.00 AP 00358413 05/13/2015 VIVERAE INC 1,150.00 0.00 1,150.00 AP 00358414 05/13/2015 WAL;TERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 3,121.05 0.00 3,121.05 AP 00358415 05/13/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2.813.45 237.37 3,050.82 *** AP 00358416 05/13/2015 WE TELL STORIES 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00358417 05/13/2015 WEST END MATERIAL SUPI'LY 820.75 0.00 820.75 AP 00358418 05/13/2015 WESTLAND GROUP INC 24,757.50 0.00 - 24,757.50 AP 00358419 05/13/2015 WIGHT,BILL 249.10 0.00 249.10 Al' 00358420 05/13/2015 WINCO FOODS 0.00 70.94 70.94 AP 00358421 05/13/2015 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 1,013.04 0.00 1,013.04 AP 00358422 05/14/2015 JAMEX 2.834.40 0.00 2,834.40 AP 00358423 05/14/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 660.55 0.00 660.55 AP 00358424 05/14/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 869.62 0.00 869.62 AP 00358425 05/14/2015 AUTO BODY 2000 611.62 0.00 611.62 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P18 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358426 05/14/2015 COMP U ZONE 85.00 0.00 85.00 AP 00358429 05/14/2015 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74,478.41 503.77 74,982.18*** AP 00358430 05/14/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 848.55 0.00 848.55 AP 00358431 05/14/2015 FORD OF UPLAND INC 198.35 0.00 198.35 AP 00358432 05/14/2015 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 124.00 0.00 124.00 Al' 00358433 05/14/2015 VISTA PAINT 745.37 0.00 745.37 AP 00358434 05/20/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,128.12 0.00 1,128.12 Al' 00358435 05/20/2015 ACTION AWARDS INC. 4.454.76 0.00 4,454.76 AP 00358436 05/20/2015 AC'T'IVE KIDS IN THE I.E. 2.822.40 0.00 2,822.40 Al' 00358437 05/20/2015 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1,313.50 0.00 1,313.50 Al' 00358438 05/20/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE • 6,843.06 0.00 6,843.06 Al' 00358439 05/20/2015 AFSS 0.00 50.00 50.00 Al' 00358440 05/20/2015 ALAN'S,ALEX 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP (10358441 05/20/2015 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 184.00 0.00 184.00 AP 00358442 05/20/2015 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES 1.,LC 26,597.43 0.00 26,597.43 Al' 00358443 05/20/2015 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 1,708.67 1,708.67 AP 00358444 05/20/2015 ALPHAGRAPHICS 255.17 0.00 255.17 AP 00358445 05/20/2015 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 281.07 0.00 281.07 AP 00358446 05/20/2015 ANDREW.MARY 147.75 0.00 147.75 AP 00358447 05/20/2015 APPA 7,255.61 0.00 7.255.61 AP 00358448 05/20/2015 ASIAN-AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00358449 05/20/2015 ASSI SECURITY 3.670.00 0.00 3,670.00 AP 00358450 05/20/2015 AUSTIN,MELVIN 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00358451 05/20/2015 BASELINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00358452 05/20/2015 BELLE'S PRINTING EXPRESS INC. 768.04 0.00 768.04 AP 00358453 05/20/2015 BERGHOEFER,SUSAN 324.00 0.00 324.00 AP 00358454 05/20/2015 BOLTON,HEATHER 971.05 0.00 971.05 AP 00358455 05/20/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 0.00 354.24 354.24 AP 00358456 05/20/2015 CABLE INC. 12,933.50 0.00 12,933.50 AP 00358457 05/20/2015 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CORI' 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00358458 05/20/2015 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 84.05 0.00 84.05 AP 00358459 05/20/2015 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 1.768.16 0.00 1,768.16 AP 00358460 05/20/2015 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,020.29 0.00 1,020.29 AP 00358461 05/20/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 29,373.04 850.00 30,223.04*** AP 00358462 05/20/2015 CIIABAD OP THE INLAND EMPIRE 84.00 0.00 84.00 AP 00358463 05/20/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 130,97 0.00 130.97 AI' 00358464 05/20/2015 CINTAS CORI'.4150 123.12 0.00 123.12 AP 00358465 05/20/2015 CIIYGATE ASSOCIATES LLC 618.19 0.00 618.19 Al' 00358466 05/20/2015 CLEAN ENERGY 233.29 0.00 233.29 AP 00358467 05/20/2015 CLEAR COAST RESTORATION 1,200.00 2,335.00 , 3,535.00*** AP 00358468 05/20/2015 COIT SERVICES INC. 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00358469 05/20/2015 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 1,917.00 0.00 1,917.00 AP 00358470 05/20/2015 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00358471 05/20/2015 CONFIRE IPA 0.00 50,254.43 50,254.43 AP 00358472 05/20/2015 CRISTIANA,AMISTAD 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358473 05/20/2015 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES MC 3,000.24 0.00 3,000.24 AP 00358474 05/20/2015 CYCLING CONNECTION 325.00 0.00 325.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P19 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358475 05/20/2015 D& I)SERVICES INC. 430.00 0.00 430.00 AP 00358476 05/20/2015 DANCE TERRIFIC 472.50 0.00 472.50 AP 00358477 05/20/2015 DELACRUZ.ALEJANDRA 164.00 0.00 164.00 AP 00358478 05/20/2015 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00358479 05/20/2015 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00358480 05/20/2015 DUMI3ELL.MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT.THE 0.00 300.00 300.00 AP 00358481 05/20/2015 DUNN.ANN MARIE 189.00 0.00 189.00 AP 00358482 05/20/2015 li GROUP,THE 450.00 0.00 450.00 Al' 00358483 05/20/2015 E POLY STAR INC. 1,819.80 0.00 1,819.80 AP 00358484 05/20/2015 EARTHWORKS SOIL AMENDMENTS INC. 3,191.94 0.00 3,191.94 AP 00358485 05/20/2015 EDWARD PROFESSIONAL ADVISIORS 950.00 0.00 950.00 AP 00358486 05/20/2015 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00358487 05/20/2015 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 2,219.66 0.00 2,219.66 AP 00358488 05/20/2015 EXPLORER POST 501 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 Al' 00358489 05/20/2015 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 1,628.44 0.00 1,628.44 AP 00358490 05/20/2015 FIRST VETERINARY SUPPLY 293.12 0.00 293.12 AP 00358491 05/20/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 903.17 903.17 AP 00358492 05/20/2015 FUEL SERV 37.33 0.00 37.33 AP 00358493 05/20/2015 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 6.718,22 0.00 6,718.22 AP 00358494 05/20/2015 GEMPLERS INC 469.25 0.00 469.25 AP 00358495 05/20/2015 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 162.00 0.00 162.00 AP 00358496 05/20/2015 GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 435.00 0.00 435.00 AP 00358497 05/20/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 114.23 0.00 114.23 AP 00358498 05/20/2015 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 0.00 2,250.00 Al' 00358499 05/20/2015 GULF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AI' 00358500 05/20/2015 HEDIGER. PATRICK 64.89 0.00 64.89. AI' 00358501 05/20/2015 HEILIG.KELLY 1.074.60 0.00 1.074.60 AP 00358502 05/20/2015 HENRY SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 356.40 0.00 356.40 AP 00358503 05/20/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 2,148.77 0.00 2,148.77 AP 00358504 05/20/2015 (TOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 708.14 0.00 708.14 AP 00358505 05/20/2015 HOYT LUMBER CO..SM 0.00 12.60 12.60 AP 00358506 05/20/2015 IIUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY IN' 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00358507 05/20/2015 IBM CORPORATION 225.57 0.00 225.57 AP 00358508 05/20/2015 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATION 1.986.75 0.00 1,986.75 AP 00358509 05/20/2015 INTEGRITY DOOR& HARDWARE INC 4,308.02 0.00 4.308.02 AP 00358510 05/20/2015 INTERNET INC 4,077.00 0.00 4,077.00 AP 00358511 05/20/2013 J C CHANG& ASSOCIATES INC 1,232.00 0.00 1.232,00 AP 00358512 05/20/2015 JACKSON HIRSH INC 531.03 0.00 531.03 AP 00358513 05/20/2015 JDC INC 22,347.00 0.00 22,347.00 AP 00358514 05/20/2015 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 3,216.51 0.00 3,216.51 AP 00358515 05/20/2015 JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 560.61 0.00 560.61 AP 00358516 05/20/2015 KENT HARRIS TRUCKING& MATERIALS 332.80 0.00 332.80 AP 00358517 05/20/2015 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC 138,292.68 0.00 138,292.68 AP 00358518 05/20/2015 LANGUAGE PLANET 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00358519 05/20/2015 LANTAI, KRIS 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00358520 05/20/2015 LAWMEN SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 1,555.20 1.555.20 AP 00358521 05/20/2015 LENOVO(UNITED STATES)INC. 128.34 0.00 128.34 User: VLOPEZ L VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 'rime: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P20 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Hate Vendor Name City Fire Amount Al' 00358522 05/20/2015 LEW EDWARDS GROUP.THE 5,750.00 0.00 5,750.00 AP 00358523 05/20/2015 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 163.20 163.20 AP 00358524 05/20/2015 LIGHTHOUSE,THE 2,067.12 0.00 2,067.12 AP 00358525 05/20/2015 LIONS SHARE REALTY 36.37 0.00 36.37 AP 00358526 05/20/2015 LE I LE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 0.00 - 300.00 AP 00358527 05/20/2015 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 457.20 0.00 457.20 AP 00358528 05/20/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 3,116.08 0.00 3,116.08 AP 00358529 05/20/2015 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 227.20 0.00 227.20 AP 00358530 05/20/2015 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 1.949.84 0.00 1,949.84 AP 00358531 05/20/2015 MCCALL,RAY 925.00 0.00 925.00 AP 00358532 05/20/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 383.68 0.00 383.68 AP 00358533 05/20/2015 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 940.00 0.00 940.00 AP 00358534 05/20/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 7.99 0.00 7.99 AP 00358535 05/20/2015 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 124.00 485.00 609.00*** AP 00358536 05/20/2015 MILANES, YIKCIA 275.00 0.00 275.00 AP 00358537 05/20/2015 MIRION TECHNOLOGIES GDS INC 294.03 0.00 294.03 AP 00358538 05/20/2015 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US INC 626.95 0.00 626.95 AP 00358539 05/20/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW PAINTBALL 2.441.88 0.00 2,441.88 AP 00358540 05/20/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 543.42 0.00 543.42 AP 00358541 05/20/2015 MR CHEF 11013 LLC 120.70 0.00 120.70 AP 00358542 05/20/2015 N-III INCORPORATED 1.133.40 0.00 1,133.40 AP 00358543 05/20/2015 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.58 0.00 21.58 AI' 00358544 05/20/2015 NEXGEN 411.22 0.00 411.22 AP 00358545 05/20/2015 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 2.517.50 2,517.50 AP 00358546 05/20/2015 OCLC INC 50.45 0.00 50.45 AP 00358547 05/20/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 4,120.97 0.00 4,120.97 AP 00358549 05/20/2015 ONTARIO SI'AY AND NEUTER INC 2,250.00 0.00 2.250.00 AP 00358550 05/20/2015 OROZCO.JOE 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00358551 05/20/2015 PACIFIC ADVANCED CIVIL ENGINEERING 1,036.00 0.00 1,036.00 AP 00358552 05/20/2015 PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS 9,595.00 0.00 9,595.00 AP 00358553 05/20/2015 PACIFIC YOUTII SPORTS 2.604.00 0.00 2,604.00 AP 00358554 05/20/2015 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 • 3,500.00 AP 00358555 05/20/2015 PENNYSAVER USA PUBLISHING LI.0 779.67 0.00 779.67 AP 00358556 05/20/2015 . PEP BOYS 162.55 0.00 162.55 AP 00358557 05/20/2015 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 1,927.81 0.00 1,927.81 AP 00358558 05/20/2015 PONTO&SONS WHOLESALE 152.74 0.00 152.74 AP 00358559 05/20/2015 I'RO SALES GROUP INC 2.328.76 0.00 2,328.76 Al' 00358560 05/20/2015 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 0.00 318.804.80 318,804.80 AP 00358561 05/20/2015 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 4.25355 0.00 4,253.55 AP 00358562 05/20/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUND 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00358563 05/20/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUND 6.422.00 0.00 6,422.00 AP 00358564 05/20/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 9,984.47 0.00 9,984.47 AP 00358565 05/20/2015 REALITY COMMUNITY CHURCH 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00358566 05/20/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 2,037.96 0.00 2,037.96 AP 00358567 05/20/2015 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 248.29 0.00 248.29 AP 00358568 05/20/2015 ROBLES, RAUL P 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00358569 05/20/2015 RODRIGUEZ INC. RY 216.00 0.00 216.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 08:06:1 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P21 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358570 05/20/2015 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 125.00 0.00 125.00 ' AP 00358571 05/20/2015 Rom ROOTER 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00358572 05/20/2015 RUIZ. ROBIN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358573 05/20/2015 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 1,535.05 1,535.05 AP 00358574 05/20/2015 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 2,484.00 0.00 2,484.00 Al' 00358575 05/20/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 278.80 0.00 278.80 Al' 00358576 05/20/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CON'T'ROLLER REC( 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00358577 05/20/2015 SC FUELS 34,571.84 3,647.33 38,219.17*** AP 00358578 05/20/2015 SHRED IT 319.55 0.00 319.55 AP 00358579 05/20/2015 SHRED PROS 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00358580 05/20/2015 SMARTLITE 395.00 0.00 395.00 Al' 00358581 05/20/2015 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 0.00 6,063.98 6,063.98 AI' 00358582 05/20/2015 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 205.58 0.00 205.58 AP 00358586 05/20/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,330.29 0.00 9,330.29 AP 00358587 05/20/2015 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,377.01 0.00 1,377.01 Al' 00358588 05/20/2015 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 26.33 26.33 AP 00358589 05/20/2015 SWIFTY SIGN 97.20 0.00 97.20 AP 00358590 05/20/2015 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00358591 05/20/2015 TI'IOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 1,251.97 0.00 1,251.97 AP 00358592 05/20/2015 TICKETS.COM 1.070.78 0.00 1,070.78 AP 00358593 05/20/2015 TJ'S FLOOR COVERING SUPPLIES INC 534.64 0.00 534.64 AP 00358594 05/20/2015 TORO TOWING 325.00 0.00 325.00 AP 00358595 05/20/2015 TREBOR SHORING RENTAL 0.00 4.692.60 4,692.60 AP 00358596 05/20/2015 TRIMMER. PATRICIA A 100.79 0.00 100.79 Al' 00358597 05/20/2015 TUMBLEWEED PRESS INC 838.60 0.00 838.60 AP 00358598 05/20/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 15.057.73 0.00 15,057.73 Al' 00358599 05/20/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,000.82 0.00 1,000.82 Al' 00358600 05/20/2015 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SC)CAL 319.50 0.00 319.50 Al' 00358601 05/20/2015 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 19.682.00 0.00 19,682.00 AP 00358602 05/20/2015 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 451.82 0.00 451.82 Al' 00358603 05/20/2015 URIBE,JONATHAN 0.00 130.00 130.00 Al' 00358604 05/20/2015 UTILIQUEST 2,402.55 0.00 2,402.55 AP 00358605 05/20/2015 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00358606 05/20/2015 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 163.93 0.00 163.93 AP 00358607 05/20/2015 VEND U COMPANY 241.27 0.00 241.27 ' AP 00358608 05/20/2015 Verizon 37.71 0.00 37.71 Al' 00358609 05/20/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 1.189.67 0.00 1.189.67 AP 00358611 05/20/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 6,726.70 1.329.10 8,055.80"* AP 00358612 05/20/2015 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 3.921.64 0.00 3,921.64 AP 00358613 05/20/2015 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00358614 05/20/2015 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 2.038.00 0.00 2,038.00 AP 00358615 05/20/2015 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,546.07 3.354.05 4,900.12 *** AP 00358616 05/20/2015 WARREN&CO INC.CART. 229.03 0.00 229.03 AP 00358617 05/20/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,223.18 0.00 2,223.18 AP 00358618 05/20/2015 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 515.00 0.00 515.00 AI' 00358619 05/20/2015 WONG.DAVID 298.50 0.00 298.50 AI' 00358620 05/20/2015 YOURMEMBERSHIP.COM INC 30.00 0.00 30.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P22 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 5/13/2015 through 5/26/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00358621 05/20/2015 Z_HANG, MATTHEW 115.00 0.00 115.00 AP 00358622 05/21/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,001.56 0.00 1,001.56 AP 00358623 05/21/2015 AGILINE LLC 3,050.00 0.00 3,050.00 AP 00358625 05/21/2015 13RODART BOOKS 2.491.01 0.00 2.491.01 AP 00358626 05/21/2015 CALSENSE -2.393.62 0.00 2,393.62 AP 00358627 05/21/2015 COMP U ZONE 1.678.02 0.00 1,678.02 AP 00358629 05/21/2015 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT' 60.862.01 337.91 61.199.92"' AP 00358630 05/21/2015 EMCOR SERVICE 32.513.00 0.00 32,513.00 AP 00358631 05/21/2015 EWING IRRIGATIONPRODUCTS 503.39 0.00 503.39 AP 00358632 0521/2015 FASTENAL COMPANY 1.477.30 0.00 1,477.30 AP 00358633 05/21/2015 HOLI,IDAY ROCK CO INC 6,028.69 0.00 6,028.69 AP 00358634 05/21/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 5,690.03 • 0.00 5,690.03 AP 00358635 05/21/2015 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1.155.00 0.00 1,155.00 AP 00358636 05/21/2015 INTERSTATE,BATTERIES 0.00 320.19 320.19 AI' 00358637 05/21/2015 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 48,394.27 48,394.27 AP 00358638 05/21/2015 LIMS AU'T'O INC 1.989.92 0.00 1,989.92 Al' 00358639 05/21/2015 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 429.71 429.71 AP 00358640 05/21/2015 NEC CORPORATION OP AMERICA 4,276.00 0.00 4.276.00 AI' 00358641 05/21/2015 PENNY PLUMBING 3.975.89 0.00 3,975.89 Al' 00358642 05/21/2015 TOMARK SPORTS INC 2.192.85 0.00 2,192.85 AP 00358643 05/21/2015 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,005.00 0.00 1,005.00 AP 00358644 05/21/2015 VISTA PAINT 2,236.12 0.00 2,236.12 EP 00005211 05/13/2015 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCTIO CUCAMONGA 9.320.00 0.00 9,320.00 EP 00005212 05/13/2015 EXEI,ON GENERATION CO. LLC. 275,987.40 0.00 275,987.40 EP 00005213 05/13/2015 RCCEA 1,336.00 0.00 1,336.00 EP 00005214 05/13/2015 RCPFA 10,449.56 0.00 10,449.56 EP 00005213 05/13/2015 RIVERSIDE,CITY OF 6,294.00 0.00 6,294.00 EP 00005216 05/13/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUN'T'Y 21.00 0.00 21.00 El' 00005217 05/13/2015 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 13.140.00 0.00 13,140.00 EP 00005218 05/13/2015 VIASYN INC 2.250.66 0.00 2,250.66 EP 00005220 05/20/2015 FORTISTN2 METHANE LANE GROUP I.,I,C 94,765.93 0.00 94,765.93 EP 00005221 05/20/2015 SOUTIIERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY 880.32 0.00 880.32 EP 00005222 05/20/2015 TED KURLAND ASSOCIATES 2,790.00 0.00 2,790.00 Total City: $2,685,627.08 Total Fire: $563,005.52 Grand Total: $3,248,632.60 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures . User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ rage: 9 Current Date: 05/27/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 08:06:11 23 STAFF REPORT . r PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT , J� Date: June 3, 2015 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 002 EXTENDING THE TERM OF CONTRACT CO 13-210 WITH COMMERCIAL CLEANING SYSTEMS (CCS) OF COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA TO JUNE 30, 2016, INCLUDING A FEE INCREASE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2016, FOR CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $500,000 FOR CITY AND $50,000 FOR FIRE DISTRICT TO BE-FUNDED FROM 1001312-5304 (FACILITIES MAINTENANCE), 1700312-5304 (SPORTS COMPLEX), AND 3281529-5300 (FIRE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE) CONTINGENT UPON THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FY 2015-2016; AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE TO ADJUST THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND SPENDING LIMIT OF SAID CONTRACTS IN THE FUTURE, ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JANITORIAL SERVICE BUDGET LINE 5304 AND FIRE DISTRICT JANITORIAL SERVICE BUDGET LINE 5300; AND TO RENEW SAID CONTRACTS UPON MUTUAL CONSENT OF CITY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CONTRACTOR FOR ONE (1) YEAR PERIODS UP TO AN ADDITIONAL FOUR (4) YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2020 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 002 extending the term of contract CO 13-210 with Commercial Cleaning Systems (CCS) of Costa Mesa, California to June 30, 2016, including a fee increase effective January 1, 2016, for Citywide Janitorial Services in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for City and $50,000 for Fire District to be funded from 1001312-5304 (Facilities Maintenance), 1700312-5304 (Sports Complex), and 3281529-5300 (Fire Facilities Maintenance) contingent upon the adopted budget for FY 2015-2016; authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contracts in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department janitorial service budget line 5304 and Fire District janitorial service budget line 5300; and to renew said contracts upon mutual consent of City, Fire District and Contractor for one (1) year periods up to an additional four (4) years ending June 30, 2020. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council approved a competitively bid contract, CO 13-210, with Commercial Cleaning Systems (CCS) of Costa Mesa, California on August 21, 2013. CCS has submitted a Letter of Intent to renew the contract for FY 2015-2016 and is requesting a nine percent increase in contract rates effective January 1, 2016. Subsequent to CCS entering into this contract, Assembly Bill 10 was approved by the Legislature and signed by the Governor on September 25, 2013. AB 10 increases the minimum wage in California from $9.00 per hour to not less than $10.00 per hour effective January 1, 2016. As the cleaning crews consist predominantly of minimum wage earners, this State mandated wage hike will increase APPRovN AMKNDNIISN'I'002'1'0 CON'IRAC."I'CO 13-210\XTI'FI CONINIRRCIAI.CLEANING SYSrI°:NIS P24 ISYI'UNDING'1'hIIC"I'KRM OI '1'i•IN CONTRACT TO j UNE 30,2020 JUNN3,2015 PACT:Two CCS' direct labor costs to provide janitorial services approximately eleven percent for the second half of FY 2015-2016. The requested fee increase is to mitigate these increased labor costs. Commercial Cleaning Systems has provided an acceptable level of service during the term of this contract. Therefore staff recommends the Council authorize a one-year contract extension for fiscal year 2015-2016 and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit and to renew said contract for one (1) year periods up to an additional four (4) years ending June 30, 2020. Respectfully submitted, If William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director BW:TQ/pf • • STAFF REPORT , , P25 r PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2015 r RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAb10NOA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 003 WITH MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC. OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA EXTENDING THE TERM OF CONTRACT CO 89- 136 TO JUNE 30, 2016 WITH MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SCOPE OF WORK IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $398,700 IN FY 2015-2016; APPROVE AMENDMENT 003 EXTENDING THE TERM OF CONTRACT CO 90-145 TO JUNE 30, 2016 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $625,150 IN FY 2015-2016; APPROVE AMENDMENT 006 EXTENDING THE TERM OF CONTRACT CO 93-006 TO JUNE 30, 2016 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $827,350 FOR CITY FACILITIES AND $70,200 FOR FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES IN FY 2015-2016; FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CITY PARKS, ARCHIBALD LIBRARY, COUNTY WASH ENDS, AND CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE SITES, WITH NO FEE INCREASES FOR CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT FACILITIES; CONTINGENT ON THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FY 2015-2016, TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS GENERAL, SPECIAL AND FIRE FUND ACCOUNTS; AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE TO ADJUST THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND SPENDING LIMIT OF SAID CONTRACTS IN THE FUTURE, ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BUDGET LINE 5300 AND FIRE DISTRICT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BUDGET LINE 5300; AND TO RENEW SAID CONTRACTS UPON MUTUAL CONSENT OF CITY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CONTRACTOR FOR ONE (1) YEAR PERIODS UP TO AN ADDITIONAL TWO (2) YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council and Fire District Board of Directors approve Amendment 003 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. of Irwindale, California extending the term of contract CO 89-136 to June 30, 2016 with minor adjustments to the scope of work in an amount not to exceed $398,700 in FY 2015-2016; approve Amendment 003 extending the term of contract CO 90-145 to June 30, 2016 in an amount not to exceed $625,150 in FY 2015-2016; approve Amendment 006 extending the term of contract CO 93-006 to June 30, 2016, adding additional landscape sites to the scope of work, in an amount not to exceed $827,350 for City facilities and $70,200 for Fire District facilities in FY 2015- 2016; for the maintenance of City parks, Archibald Library, County wash ends, and City and Fire District landscape sites, with no fee increases for City and Fire District facilities; contingent on the adopted budget for FY 2015-2016, to be funded from various General, Special and Fire Fund accounts; authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contracts in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department landscape maintenance budget line 5300 and Fire District landscape maintenance budget line 5300; and to renew said contracts upon mutual consent of City, Fire District and Contractor for one (1) year periods up to an additional two (2) years ending June 30, 2018. CITY COUNCIL,STAFF REPORT Re: CONTRACT RANI W:\AI S FOR CO 89-136,CO 90-145 AND CO 93-006 will i MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES,INC.. P26 June 3, 2015 Page 2 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Mariposa is one of three landscape contractors used by the City to provide maintenance services at various landscape sites citywide. The City Council has previously awarded contracts (CO 89-136, CO 90-145 and CO 93-006) to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. Mariposa has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga with a minor adjustment to the scope of work and no fee increase for City and Fire District facilities. Mariposa has consistently provided good service during the term of these contracts. Therefore, staff recommends Council authorize one year contract extensions with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. including the minor adjustments to the Scope of Work and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit and to renew said contracts for additional one (1) year periods ending June 30, 2018. Respectfully submitted, iSitiraaif William Wittkopf Mike Costello Public Works Services Director Fire Chief WW:DR/pf • • P27 STAFF REPORT WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT �t RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: June 3, 2015 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I Subject: CONSIDERATION TO REJECT THE BID FOR THE "PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT" AS NON-RESPONSIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE CITY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council consider rejecting the bid for the"Public Safety IAQ HVAC Project" as non-responsive to the needs of the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, one (1) bid was received and opened at 2:00 p.m. on May 19, 2015 for the "Public Safety IAQ HVAC Project". The project's scope of work included the construction of a vestibule with exhaust fan in the parking garage connecting with the lower level mechanical room, sealing the existing relief air in the lower level mechanical room and cleaning the HVAC ducts throughout the Public Safety building on the plaza and lower levels. The Engineer's Estimate for this scope of work was $39,735.36 The bid received far exceeded the Engineer's Estimate and project budget. Attached is a copy of the bid summary. Staff will review the project's scope of work and seek permission to re-bid at a future date. Respectfully submitted,n William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director WW:TQ/pf P28 REJECT BID FOR"PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT" JUNE 3,2015 PAGE 2 . 'BID SUMMARY 1 I ' !PROJECT:PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT I ! 'BID OPENING: TUESDAY,May 19,2015 I Engineer's Los Angeles Air Item Description Quantity Unit Estimate - Conditioning Inc. Division 01 _General Conditions 1 LS $6,029.10 $1,896.00 Division 06 Wood, Plastics and Composites 1 LS $1,541.52 _ $0.00 Division 07 Thermal and Moisture Protection 1 LS $5,976.74 $0.00 Division 08 Openings 1 LS $2,599.75 _ $22,500.00 Division 09 Finishes 1 LS $10,673.92 $11,000.00 Division 23 Heating, Ventilation and Air Cond. 1 LS $11,214.13 $88,470.00 Division 26 Electrical 1 LS $1,700.21 $4,100.00 Total: i $39,735.36 $127,966.00 P29 STAFF REPORT PUBIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT ‘ce-,4 Date: June 3, 2015 L� To: Mayor and Members of the City Council RANCHO John R. Gillison, City Manager CUCAMONGA From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains, and Fleet Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR "TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE", EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2015 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2016, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA, CONTINGENT ON THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FY 2015/2016 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $788,050 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNTS 1177303-5300 ($768,050) AND 1001318-5300 ($20,000); AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE TO ADJUST THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND SPENDING LIMIT OF SAID CONTRACT IN THE FUTURE, ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE BUDGET LINE 5300 AND TO RENEW SAID CONTRACT UPON MUTUAL CONSENT OF CITY AND CONTRACTOR FOR ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR PERIODS UP TO A TOTAL OF FIVE (5) YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2020 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract for"Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance", effective July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, to the lowest responsive bidder, Siemens Industry, Inc. of Orange, California, contingent on the adopted budget for FY 2015/2016 in an amount not to exceed $788,050 to be funded from accounts 1177303-5300 ($768,050) and 1001318-5300 ($20,000); authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contract in the future, on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Services Department Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting maintenance budget line 5300 and to renew said contract upon mutual consent of City and Contractor for additional one (1) year periods up to a total of five (5) years ending June 30, 2020. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council approved the specifications and authorized the City Clerk to advertise the"Notice Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance contract during its March 18, 2015 meeting. The Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance contract is an annual contract for the monthly routine maintenance of signalized intersections, flashing crosswalks, signalized crosswalks, flashing school beacons and extraordinary maintenance of City of Rancho Cucamonga owned traffic signals and safety lighting infrastructure. When the current traffic signal maintenance contract was competitively bid, only one bid was received and Council awarded the contract on June 3, 2009 to Republic ITS which was later acquired by Siemens Industry, Inc. AWARD OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT P30 )uNE3,2015 PAGE 2 Staff updated the traffic signal maintenance specifications and Council authorized the advertisement for bids in December 2014. Four contractors attended the pre-bid meeting but only one bid was received on January 20, 2015 from Siemens Industry, Inc. Staff reviewed the bid documents and found it in the City's best interest to reject the bid received and go back out to bid for these services. Staff then revised bid specifications and made significant changes to the bid item descriptions in an attempt to attract more bidders. Council authorized the advertisement and bids were again received on April 21, 2015. The same four contractors attended the pre-bid meeting and two bids were received for this second solicitation. Staff reviewed the bids and noted that one was from Siemens Industry and the other from a firm located in southern Nevada. Though significantly higher than the current contract which expires June 30, 2015, Siemens' weighted bid was less than half the amount of the second bid (see bid summary attached). It is apparent through its acquisitions that Siemens Industry holds a functional advantage in the local market for traffic signal maintenance services driving up signal maintenance costs for Rancho Cucamonga and other agencies. Since Siemens Industry, Inc. is the lowest responsive bidder, staff recommends a contract be awarded to Siemens Industry, Inc. for Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance. Respectfully submitted, LAKOktota4 William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director Attachment WW:ER/pf AWARD ORTRAERIC SIGNAL.AND SAFI!1Y LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT P31 JUNE 3,2015 PAGE 3 BID SUMMARY PROJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BID OPENING: TUESDAY,APRIL 21, 2015 'CONTRACT PROPOSAL COST SUMMATION Siemens Industry,Inc. TransCore ITS Accumulative Adjustment Accumulative Adjustment Item Description Total Factor Subtotal Total Factor Subtotal Traffic Signal: 1 Monthly Routine Maintenance(Each) $85.00 50 $4,250.00 $322.75 50 516,137.50 Flashing Crosswalk: 2 Monthly Routine Maintenance(Each) $52.00 20 $1,040.00 5175.98 20 _ $3,519.60 Signalized Crosswalk: 3 Monthly Routine Maintenance(Each) $52.00 20 $1,040.00 $288.01 20 $5,760.20 Flashing School Beacons: 4 Monthly Routine Maintenance(Each) 552.00 20 51,040.00 5144.00 20 52,880.00 Traffic Signal Senior Field Technician 8 Level Ill(Lead)-IMSA Certification $92.00 per hour 50 $4,600.00 $142.87 per hour 50 $7,143.50 Traffic Signal Technician 13 Level I-IMSA Certification $85.00 per hour 50 $4,250.00 $82.90 per hour 50 $4,145.00 Traffic Signal Technician-IMSA Level Ill(master system . communication experience/certification) 16 (1 day=8 hours) $740.00 50 537,1700.00 $1,142.96 50 557,148.00 47 Adjust alignment of signal head on mast arm $85.00 20 $1,700.00 $90.03 20 $1,800.60 Replace Incandescent or LED Signal Indication with City 48 furnished LED indication $85.00 30 $2,550.00 5310.21 30 _ $9,306.30 Replace Incandescent or LED type Signal with contractor 49 supplied red,green or amber LED(City Spec.). $138.00 30 54,140.0 $451.22 30 $13,536.60 50 Replace ISNS panel with City furnished ISNS panel $180.00 1.0 $1,800.0 $180.06 10 $1,800.60 51 Install City furnished ISNS $240.0 10 $2,400.00 $620.43 10 $6,204.30 61 30'Boom/Service Truck $55.00 per trip 50 52,750.00 $282.98 per trip 50 $14,149.00 Weighted Total Value: $68,560.00 $143,531.20 •Section I-Routine Maintenance I Siemens Industry,Inc. TransCore ITS Estimated Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Subtotal Unit Price Subtotal Traffic Signal: 1 Monthly Routine Maintenance(Each) _ 181 EA $85.00 $15,385.00 $322.75 $58,417,75 Flashing Crosswalk: 2 Monthly Routine Maintenance(Each) 8 EA _ $52.00 $416.00 $175.98 $1,407.84 Signalized Crosswalk: 3 _Monthly Routine Maintenance(Each) 8 EA _ $52.00 $416.00 $288.01 $2,304.08 • Flashing School Beacons: 4 Monthly Routine Maintenance(Each) 4 EA $52.00 $208.00 $144.00 $576.00 • Routine Maintenance(per month)Total $16,425.00 $62,705.67 AWARD OF TRAFFIC SIGNAI,AND SAFETY LAG FETING MAINTENANCI?CONTRACT P32 JUNI:3,2015 PAGE 4 BID SUMMARY PROJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BID OPENING: TUESDAY,APRIL 21, 2015 Section II-Extraordinary Maintenance Siemens Industry,Inc. TransCore ITS Item Title Quantity Unit Straight Time Overtime Straight Time Overtime 5 Superintendent 1 Hour $115.00 $155.00 $125.04 $187.56 6 Engineering Technician 1 Hour $115.00 $155.03 $103.03 $150.05 7 Laboratory Technician 1, Hour $105.00 $150.03 $62.52 $93.78 Traffic Signal Senior Field Technician 8 Level Ill(Lead)-IMSA Certification 1 Hour _ $92.00 $155.00 $142.87 $214.31 Traffic Signal Senior Bench Technician 9 Level Ill-IMSA Certification 1 Hour $115.00 $155.03 $142.87 $214.31 Fiber Optics for ITS,Traffic,and Communication Systems Technician Level I-IMSA Certification Utility 10 Technician-Lead 1 Hour $115.00 $155.00 $106.11 $159.17 Traffic Signal Construction Technician 11 Level II-IMSA Certification 1 Hour $110.00 $155.00 $106.11 $159.17 Traffic Signal Field Technician 12 Level II-IMSA Certification 1 Hour $110.00 $155.00 $106.11 $159.17 TrafficSignal Technician 13 Level I-IMSA Certification 1, Hour $85.00 $145.00 $82.90 $124.35 Roadway Lighting Technician 14 Level I-IMSA Certification 1, Hour $80.00 $115.00 $82.90 $124.35 15 Construction Laborer 1 Day $80.00 $115.00 $122.24 $183.36 Traffic Signal Senior Field Technician Level III(Lead)-IMSA Certification • (master system communication 16 experience/certification) (1 day=8 hours) 1 Week $740.00 $1,400.00 $1,142.96 $1,714.44 Traffic Signal Field Technician 17 Level II-IMSA Certification (1 day=8 hours) 1 Week ) $875.00 $1,400.00 $848.88 $1,273.36 AWARD OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL.AND SAFETY Y LIGI-I'I'ING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT P33 JUNE 3,2015 FAGE 5 BID SUMMARY PROJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT BID OPENING: TUESDAY,APRIL 21, 2015 Section II-Extraordinary Maintenance (continued) I Siemens Industry,Inc. TransCore ITS Item Labor and Material Quantity Unit Unit Cost Unit Cost 18 Install 6x6 traffic loop(4 or less) 1 EA $535.00 $3,915.50 19 Install 6x6 traffic loop(more than 4)) 1 EA $390.00 $3,915.50 20 Install bike loop 6x6 1 EA $535.00 $3,276.92 21 Install6'diameter circular loop(4 or less) 1 EA $535.00 $3,020.05 22 Install6'diameter circular loop(more than 4) 1 EA $390.00 $3,440.91 23 Furnish and Install No.31/3 pullbox 1 EA $865.00 $1,339.43 Swap out Video Detection Camera 24 (City to provide replacement camera) 1 EA $225.00 $270.09 Swap out Video Detection Camera 25 (Contractor to provide City specified Iteris RG4) 1 EA $2,700.00 $4,018.60 26 Furnish and Install No 5 pullbox 1 EA $1,400.00 $1,565.18 27 Furnish and Install No 6 pullbox 1 EA $1,650.00 $2,110.57 28 Install City furnished pedestrian signal head 1 EA $145.00 $620.43 29 Furnish and install City specified pedestrian signal head 1 EA $480.00 $3,088.10 30 Install City furnished ADA push button 1 EA $75.03 $233.11 31 Furnish and install City specified ADA push button 1 EA $225.03 $490.59 32 Install City furnished NEMA conflict monitor 1 EA $220.00 $233.11 33 Install City furnished Traffic Signal Cabinet 1 EA $2,300.03 $4,193.46 34 Conduct Traffic Signal Cabinet operational test 1 EA $1,250.00 $261.50 35 Conduct Safety Light and ISNS night survey 1 EA $800.00 $180.06 36 Paint Traffic Signal Cabinet 1 EA $1,300.00 $411.18 37 Paint Vehicle Head 1 EA $370.00 $855.69 38 Paint Pedestrian Head 1 EA $295.00 $855.69 Rewire 8-phase intersection with new cable and 39 conductors 1 EA Time&Materials Time&Materials 40 Install City furnished regulatory sign on signal mast arm 1 EA $145.03 $197.60 41 Replace Type 1-A(10')pole 1 EA $950.00 $2,822.10 Furnish and install Decorative street light per City 42 Standard Plan 409 1 EA $9,600.00 $13,353.73 Furnish and install Marbelite street light per City 43 Standard Plan 410 1 EA $7,400.00 $7,713.34 Item Labor and Material Quantity Unit Unit Cost Unit Cost 45 De-energize and remove damaged Marbelite street light 1 EA $1,200.00 $930.64 46 Adjust alignment of signal head on pole 1 EA $75.00 590.03 47 Adjust alignment of signal head on mast arm 1 EA $85.00 $90.03 Replace Incandescent or LED Signal Indication with City 48 furnished LED indication 1 EA $85.00 $310.21 Replace Incandescent or LED type Signal with contractor 49 supplied red,green or amber LED(City Spec.). 1 EA $138.00 $451.22 50 Replace ISNS panel with City furnished ISNS panel 1 EA $180.00 $180.06 51 Install City furnished ISNS 1 EA $240.00 $620.43 52 Furnish and install City specified 6'ISNS 1 EA $1,900.00 $4,016.41 53 Furnish and install City specified 8'ISNS 1 EA $2,300.00 $4,568.70 54 Install City furnished LED retrofit for ISNS 1 EA $290.00 $620.43 _ 55 Furnish and install City specified LED retrofit for ISNS 1 EA $1,100.00 $2,371.30 56 Measure,order and install ISNS davit arm 1 EA $2,000.00 $3,205.61 57 Install City supplied ISNS davit arm and hand existing 1 EA $880.00 $620.43 Furnish and install SDLC cable terminal block and rack for detection replacement in TS1 and TS2 Econolite Traffic 58 Signal Controller cabinets 1 EA $5,000.00 $3,790.63 Install and tune City provided ITERIS Video Detection 59 system for 8 phase intersection 1 EA $5,800.00 $4,963.44 AWARD OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL.AND SAFETY LIGHTING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT P34 JuNE 3,2015 PAGE 6 ,Section III-Equipment Siemens Industry,Inc. TransCore ITS Item Type of Equipment Quantity Unit Cost per Job/Trip Cost per Job/Trip 60 Pick-up Truck 1 Trip $40.00 $126.00 61 30'Boom/Service Truck 1 Trip $55.00 $282.98 62 50'Height Boom Truck 1 Trip $300.00 $269.74 63 Crane Truck 1 Trip $330.00 $282.98 64 Water Truck 1 Trip $50.00 $184.86 65 Dump Truck 1 Trip $75.00 $253.54 66 Concrete Saw 1 Trip $50.00 $106.37 67 Complete Paint Rig 1 Trip $150.00 $178.60 68 Jackhammer/Compressor 1 Trip $50.00 $106.37 69 Trencher 1 Trip $210.00 $2,461.10 70 Vacuum Truck 1 Trip $265.00 $595.35 71 Backhoe 1 Trip $2,300.00 $420.34 • STAFF REPORT WORKS SERVICES Y",J■■yy p35 PUBLIC ORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT J-� JJ--ii RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 003 TO RENEW CONTRACT CO 08-162 WITH UNITED PACIFIC SERVICE, INC. (UPS) OF LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA, WITH NO FEE INCREASE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS FOR CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2015 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2016, CONTINGENT UPON THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FY 2015-2016 IN AN ANNUAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $977,500, TO BE FUNDED FROM VARIOUS CITY AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ACCOUNTS; AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE TO ADJUST THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AND SPENDING LIMIT OF SAID CONTRACT IN THE FUTURE ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TREE MAINTENANCE BUDGET LINES 5300 AND 5310; AND TO RENEW SAID CONTRACT UPON MUTUAL CONSENT OF CITY AND CONTRACTOR FOR ONE (1) YEAR PERIODS UP TO AN ADDITIONAL FOUR (4) YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2020 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve Amendment No. 003 to renew contract CO 08-162 with United Pacific Service, Inc. (UPS) of La Habra, California, with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for Citywide Tree Maintenance services effective July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, contingent upon the adopted budget for FY 2015-2016 in an annual amount not to exceed $977,500, to be funded from various City and landscape maintenance district accounts; authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit of said contract in the future on an as needed basis, in accordance with the Public Works Department tree maintenance budget lines 5300 and 5310; and to renew said contract upon mutual consent of City and Contractor for one (1) year periods up to an additional four (4) years ending June 30, 2020. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In October of 2008, the Public Works Services Department provided Purchasing with specifications to conduct a competitive bid process for citywide tree maintenance services. Based on staff's recommendation, the City Council approved and awarded a contract to United Pacific Service, Inc. (UPS). The contract was valid from the effective date, October 16, 2008, through June 30, 2009 and may be extended on a year-to-year basis by mutual agreement of the City and the Contractor. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement remain in effect. UPS has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for FY 2015-2016 with no rate increase. There have been no rate increases during the term of the agreement and UPS has provided consistently good service to the City. Therefore staff P36 recommends the Council authorize a one year contract extension with UPS for fiscal year 2015-2016 and authorize the City Manager or his/her designee to adjust the level of service and spending limit and to renew said contracts for additional one (1) year periods ending June 30, 2020. Respectfully submitted, IP, William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director BW:DR/pf • • P37 J STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer *S Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $517,813.20, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, R.J NOBLE COMPANY, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF$51,781.32, FOR THE 8TH STREET FROM BAKER AVENUE TO HELLMAN AVENUE, BAKER AVENUE FROM MAIN STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 6T" STREET FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX RT7360 AND MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NOS. 11743035650/1849174-0, 11743035650/1851174-0 AND 11773035650/1869177-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $517,813.20, to the lowest responsive bidder, R.J. Noble Company, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $51,781.32, for the 8`" Street from Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue, Baker Avenue from Main Street to Foothill Boulevard and 6th Street from Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation projects to be funded from Gas Tax RT7360 and Measure I Funds, Account Nos. 11743035650/1849174-0, 11743035650/1851174-0 and 11773035650/1869177-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 5, 2015, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $543,525.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all but one to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. The bid of the apparent low bidder, R-JS General Construction, was deemed non-responsive because the bid package was missing the subcontractor page. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of clearing and grubbing and pavement preparation, crack sealing, cold planing, asphalt concrete patching, asphalt rubber hot mix (ARHM) overlay, striping and pavement markings, and installation of traffic signal video detection systems. The contract documents call for forty (40) working days to complete this construction. Resp ful ubmitted, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer F (I I I JL I V? 1.., ._a_I-IL__-I�__... ..__ (L__...J L II WILSON AVE.i I w a a a g 1 > a s ; W BANYAN SL m I a 9 LEMON AE V LEMON_ _\ l,_'I —I J I I HIGHLAND AVE l L��_ HIGHLAND AVE. --mom _ _ I swoon I■ 210. t�1 _ L. t�t� 2 ��t I r /, vlcn. rc 19th ST.—r ___ - �' r W rt I U MONTE VISTA ST. MONTE VISTA T. w Q, a UPLAN1 °9� z / x re G m, 0 I % i co., a BASELINE AVE II 1 i - BAS: ROAD lI' j ¢ a ' PKWY iw o J\Sj a w 0 A, /2 a i j F'RPP� It PROJECT ; / CHURCH ST. LOCATION \ �m�iU s)/ f =I LL,> U \. "II Li,•, SAN BERNARDIh� RD ma w �4 �f—" g /- ° _ F00THILL BLVD 11 L '�� Cup j.... >I` cm p,�"-71—'\ a i r - . . -;", ---7---"e 4 t`:VON S} a ®9 \�_ �t4 1I a I II CM\/' �C 8 I' ¢I CENTER�` DR cc uil i � I i_ 11 _' �, _ II g i ., w FERRON �"• II w it s a MAIN Ilia _ ...�._._.�_._._._. - 'Ami 8th . R I 1 6th STREET I 't II o w, g a i 7th STREET'IR UI w 6th *I STREET I \ GAUSTI CUCAMONGA GAUSTI PARK le CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,..4 8th STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ( �� From 400' W/O Hellman Ave to Baker Ave *tee'$ BAKER AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION \ /�w` ' a s " 7 From Main St to Foothill Blvd \„ j AlIF Sr/ 6TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION N.T.S. SW From Hermosa Ave to Haven Avenue P39 STAFF REPORT is ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT �q� RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTI N OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2014/2015 TO 2018/2019 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the amended Local Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for the expenditure of Measure "I" funds covering fiscal years 2014/2015 to 2018/2019 as requested by SANBAG to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure "I" Funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Measure "I", the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving revenues annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program which outlines the specific projects upon which those funds shall be expended. Also, each local jurisdiction is required to amend the program to adjust for changes as they become apparent. Staff chooses to amend the program at the end of each fiscal year to catch any projects that may have been added, account for the estimated actual expenditures and adjust the plan as necessary for the upcoming budget year. Therefore, staff has prepared the attached amended program to be adopted by City Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments for informational purposes. The Five-Year list has been over-programmed to allow for spillage and to insure that the adopted plan contains ample projects for Measure "I" expenditures. In addition, no more than 50% of the estimated annual revenue went to categorical expenditures in the plan or general program categories. A general program category is a program of work without any indentified streets/locations. If changes are necessary (additions or deletions), the plan may be altered at each annual adoption or intermittently with City Council approval. Respectfull submitted, Mark A. euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer .MAS/JAD:Is Attachment P40 RESOLUTION NO. 15-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2014/2015 TO 2018/2019 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "I" 1990-2010 in November, 1989 and renewed as Measure "I" 2010-2040 in November 2004 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 89-1 of Authority; and WHEREAS, Expenditure plans of the Ordinance requires each local jurisdiction receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Capital Improvement Program and Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local jurisdiction annually adopt and update its Capital Improvement Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, hereby adopts the amended Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, a copy of which is attached to this resolution. • RESOLUTION NO. 15-081 — Page 1 of 1 O000 'OO m m 5J, 5 3 tTg8 "R�R�g,=muxQgTpgTTT mD 4.. 111 0 01 m x � � 4n n 4 g D rt g �r�r 75 _ 91 -- � m n ADD r r {p 11 �, a `-°. `-°. d n °' 913'70710. CD m D aW>M*t moopo 2<o aa�'o m pj a mvv00 anjcmd ;, = ioo DDD� nmmaaa&%�m6«3Da .Z1 ; xm z z m o � tn _ m (.5D �St�' =' m Cf 3gggg 3 8344-Hamm,*a u -< n z m O a.o DOA 'o N too n m p .3 33 m S3 m rzz o m a d 8 3 _ c: 8?m .0 m 2 8.5 1 3f 5=01°Q fD m m 1 A o N o n m m c FD im01. o_ ° c � Ns. ow SoNagg g8. ImmgW xa Q7 CZ') Z m o 3 - 3 mN t9 o =, — Sg .� - aO ? mroID ° Uit ' 00 gg>°g=gk r,gS B 881162 n m 71 y p - 5. . - m c �? iii mBD� mDcnmmx Z ma Z D ''0 dad � ? o EmN3m o 184,-= mt R? m� _ S,< gn—gm m m v a v °o o § 2 " pi s r 0 m 2'2 3 ' a.0 TO m 443 m fl! U o o >0 3 x aI> ° C> *� o 0 HI� m n' <a 1 sa~ $ � 3mmco �m 3 53 .. P m QNK o �Q � o n 0 0� °o °-' C'1 N .m�. Qaaidiga 3QN�O kfi av' • n �- tD p togmm bQd m < ,m:y a rn O_ w C, n N C .G y g Q E .-. ' 7 O 7 ¢Q Q -Jo tD O 0 7 7 Cr) m 547 - o. DLI 2 $ It IV N 2 @ a c o - z N CD a 3 R !0 0 0 $ a °' , 9 C) to • 0 o 34.1 *' ! m m 3 M.swoof qq 4, 44cowwwwmaMF FFhHhh gFMgq,64 -^ s o I m S m L7�88�� aa c f -▪ 3 3 C CI P3 K 804N7i00 N v jAmCW71NNO�'ItAtpO NWN IpJ app V°UpmNW tlq�Qq��N1 V�� m m o _ 8 0 0 0 0 0 2°W O O V 8 8 8 8 8 S�ig N a — °§ U 0888888,8 ij°0 ya c r „ 80 , 000000000.00 00.8880 8 88008 08 8888888888888888888'8'0 � m m 0 N N m r Z 3 c -_I -I a. n m ' g aD - m m r T I11 —I N64hhhhhHFFHNN NNhl01N NNHgN64 1� o n m sD 0:31 a o Efl q N m { CT N I N. E .. j O ° N H 1/441040404/4404/440 N N H q H N H q h N F 4, A O) A C o 8 _ o w Ni G) a WW O 0 -.0 +N 8 �p W aTA i y C O n 1. I.888 8 V A M50 O ce O) ( C Z um 88888 S 88 88 v `° W m N 64 H H H g q q N F F F h H M F q N F H H h F h -n at < o Tm m• a o EA -‹ o " t`o m N) -C m n ^ , co V j :7; `t A _ O 8 N A r N'MM646464H64 0 8 H 4044414 H F H H M 0 01 O Ni o N o w r m 8 8 8 8 ° 0 _ `8 ° a N a) 1-1 3 • •-? P42 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK P43 STAFF REPORT • ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Walt Stickney, Associate Enginv9Y i Subject: CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE CITY STAFF TO FILE THE CLAIM FOR REIMBURSEMENT FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND — ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE FACILITIES FOR ELIGIBLE GRANT FUNDS EXPENDED BY THE CITY FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL CONNECTION PROJECT (AKA DAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS) RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending by minute action that the City Council authorize staff to file the Claim for Reimbursement to the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission for the reimbursement of Local Transportation Fund — Article 3 Pedestrian, Bicycle Facilities for eligible grant funds expended by the City for the Pacific Electric Trail Connection Project (also known as the Day Trail Improvements). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 7, 2011, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Board of Directors approved funding for the City's Pacific Electric Trail/Day Creek Channel Trail Connection Project for a maximum amount of $125,000. This grant from SANBAG required the City fund a 50% funding match of the project's cost. The trail project installed certain amenities along the County's Day Creek Channel maintenance road which created a pedestrian and bicycle trail between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road along Day Creek Channel. The project provided connections at those two streets as well as a connection to the Pacific Electric Trail. The project was completed earlier this spring, and the improvements were accepted by the City Council on April 15, 2015. The total cost of this project . was $148,926. Because the grant received was for a 50/50 match, the TDA Article 3 Grant share is $74,463 and the City's share is $74,463. Staff is requesting authorization from City Council to file the claim to SANBAG in the amount of $74,463. Re pactfi submitted, uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/WS:Is P11 • a 1 .‘1111 i HILL SINE RD IIII.IDE Ru t ,�..■lt ILSO WILSON AV LSON •V altilHilli a , B•I N ST •a gm 'H���M I_ 210 F ___. II_ A,l.p......, •..—.. il71i. .at / w a 7 1 rat n I w iiiimrormingi r; WpOTHI wasegs. A .. . L..," ia„ , > it. zw .wara 0 . mglairt swig ISI —I • 6TH ST 'i EMI o iii PROJECT � _ -- e. -_ _-= ,- -�.- - -- - j/ �.- HIGHLANDAVE I ZI / > I VI Y'I ' VICTORIA PARK LN WI wI I F-- I U wT >1 j I 1 8 %,PACIFIC ELECTRIC\TRAIL it /I// I RAISE LINE RD 1------ i i 1 Vicinity Map Day Creek Channel Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Improvements P45 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Walt Stickney, Associate Engin*J. Subject: CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE CITY STAFF TO FILE THE CLAIM FOR REIMBURSEMENT FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND—ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE FACILITIES FOR ELIGIBLE GRANT FUNDS EXPENDED BY THE CITY FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL CONNECTION PROJECT (AKA DEER/DAY TRAILS IMPROVEMENTS) RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending by minute action that the City Council authorize staff to file the Claim for Reimbursement to the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission for the reimbursement of Local Transportation Fund —Article 3 Pedestrian, Bicycle Facilities for eligible grant funds expended by the City for the Pacific Electric Trail Connection Project (also known as the Day/Deer Trails Improvements). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On July 3, 2013, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Board of Directors approved funding for the City's Day Creek Trail and Deer Creek Trail for a maximum amount of $86,476. This grant from SANBAG required the City fund a minimum 25% funding match of the project's cost. The trail project installed certain amenities along the County's Day Creek Channel maintenance road as well as the County's Deer Creek Channel maintenance road. These improvements created a pedestrian and bicycle trail between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road along Day Creek Channel, and a pedestrian and bicycle trail between Base Line Road and Church Street along Deer Creek Channel. The improvements along the Day Creek Channel maintenance were funded in conjunction with a second TDA3 grant from SANBAG. That second grant funded connections to the trail at Highland Avenue, Base Line Road, and the Pacific Electric Trail. The project was completed earlier this spring, and the improvements were accepted by the City Council on April 15, 2015. The total cost of this project was $140,636. The TDA Article 3 Grant share is a not-to-exceed amount of $86,476, with the City's share being $54,160. Staff is requesting authorization from City Council to file the claim to SANBAG in the amount of $54,160. Resp 4y-s miffed, M . Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/WS:Is • i i Pd5 HILLSIDE RD .ILL'•IDERI j j ICI)Lii trail 11_80 e WILSON AV LSO I•V a ®NIIM,III■MI --1 BAI N ST .� dt _tICFRU 210 F �1.._ 21i/i74- \EaJ4t7���� Z ¢,lIflh z j CTORI v BASE� � -=,_-------1;�� �-- —F/ /111111IIIIII 1 LI 1 1 r � .tal'1 R - t. ! i lill¢ W RT Lmsa 8 q ��1 17. A B ��,�_Sit 6TH ST INI E1lA . • PROJECT _ _ _ _ I_____ - __ _ ` - HIGHLAND AVE , ir _mow __ BASE LINE RD w 1 Uj - -'---- W 1 ¢ - - Q 1 - J -' VICTORIA PARK LN ri \ - 1 --_/ � i zI i 01 1_---CHWRCH ST- . / I _ .! I "• ! I OI %I/PACIFIC ELECTRIC\TRAIL I j \ N 1 c[ I /j'// j \ 1 —j ---I'" B4SE LINE RD 1------ i i 1 Vicinity Map Day Creek Channel and Deer Creek Channel Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Improvements P47 STAFF REPORT • ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 18744, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE 210 FREEWAY WEST BOUND OFF-RAMP AT DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Tract 18744 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 18744, located on the north side of the 210 freeway west bound off-ramp at Day Creek Boulevard, the applicant was required to install related public improvements. All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the standards of the City. The public improvements will be re-inspected in approximately nine months prior to release of the maintenance bond. Developer: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 980 Montecito Dr. Suite 302 Corona, CA 92879 Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 387899S $278,900.00 (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond # 387899M $27,890.00 (Bond No.) Res rain submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/mo Attachment(s) P48 VICINITY MAP PM 18744 0 / WILSON AVENUE IN W Z W 1 m W ' SUMMIT AVENUE BANYAN 6 3 VINTAGE a PROJEC 71111.1■4.,,> , SITE g • • AVENUE iiiROUTE 210 FREEWAY VICINITY MAP P49 RESOLUTION NO. 15-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 18744 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for TRACT 18744 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RESOLUTION NO. 15-082-Page 1 P50 STAFF REPORT 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 3, 2015 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 18794 LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF 7'h STREET, SUBMITTED BY DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Parcel Map 18794 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 18794, located at the north side of 7th Street, the applicant was required to install related public improvements. All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the standards of the City. The public improvements will be re- inspected in approximately nine months prior to release of the maintenance bond. Developer: DCT 8'h & Vineyard, LLC 12 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Release: Faithful Performance Bond #105955183 $63,500.00 (7'h Street) (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond #106283073 $6,350.00 (7'h Street) (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, Mark . er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/mo Attachment(s) P51 VICINITY MAP PM 18794 ARROW HWY ARROW HWY 1 PROJECT LOCATION 81H STREET .10\ W 8TH STREET / i >Ll W s s i ei vo 4TH STREET t OACAMO4GA CREETC QWeC. I HOLT BOULEVARD t AIRPORT DRIVE 114.. �-- fVICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH _ • P52 RESOLUTION NO. 15-083 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PM 18794 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public landscape improvements for PM 18794 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. • RESOLUTION NO. 15-083- Page 1 P53 STAFF REPORT ��trio COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Daniel Schneider, Community Services Superintendent • Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A LIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR MINORS, MAJORS, JUNIORS AND SENIOR DIVISIONS TOURNAMENT HOSTED BY DISTRICT 71 LITTLE LEAGUE DURING JUNE 15 — JULY 31, 2015, AT HERITAGE, DAY CREEK, EPICENTER AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City Council approve a temporary variance of the Light Usage Policy to allow use until 11:00 p.m. on the little league (60') and senior division (90') fields at Heritage, Day Creek (70'), Epicenter Sports Complex Senior field and Red Hill Community Parks June 15 — July 31, 2015. Any use after 10:00 p.m. will be limited within those parameters as mentioned below and per the requirements listed in the attached Light Variance Policy. BACKGROUND District 71 Little League, who is hosting this regional All-Star Little League tournament, is requesting this particular item. District 71 representatives are still planning this tournament and have not determined which divisions will be playing at which sites. However, they normally host the Minors, Juniors, Seniors and the 50/70 divisions at the following parks: Red Hill Community Park, Heritage Community Park and the Epicenter Sports Complex. The current sports field policy curfew is 10:00 p.m. The Light Variance Policy allows for light variance requests that would enable youth sports groups to use the field lights past the standard curfew of 10:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday for special occasions such as regional Little League All-Star Playoffs. If a variance to the field policy curfew is approved, this allows games to continue past 10:00 p.m. because injuries, extra innings, or other reasons that have caused game(s) to last longer than scheduled. Most games will conclude by 10:00 p.m. Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years and variances have been permitted on a regular basis. The Community Services Department has not received any complaints during the last fourteen years of District 71 Little League All-Star Competitions that have been conducted at the Epicenter Sports Complex, Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks. Some of the more important requirements that the Little Leagues will be bound to are listed within the Light Variance Policy and include, but are not limited to the following: P54 CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 CONSIDERATION 01' A I.IGIl'I' VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR MINORS, MAJORS,JUNIORS AND SENIOR DIVISIONS TOURNAMENT HOSTED BY DIS'TRIC'T'71 I.ITI'I.E LEAGUE DURING JUNE 15-JULY 31,2015,Al'HERITAGE,DAY CREEK, EPICENTER AND RED HILT.COMMUNITY PARKS JUNE 3,2015 1. "NO PARKING" signs will be posted on the resident side of streets adjacent to the parks in use on Saturdays and Sundays by the requesting organization with signs provided by the City. 2. Fliers detailing the Tournament specifics must be delivered in person to each area resident or weighted in some fashion to each doorstep. The flier must also include home phone numbers of a district or regional representative and any league presidents. The entire flier process will be accomplished at league expense. • 3. Amplified sound systems will be checked prior to the tournament. Staff will drop in unannounced to monitor at least two times a week during the tournament. Announcing will be limited to: • General welcome • Introduction of teams • Announcement of player to the plate • Recap of runs and score between innings • Play-by-play announcing will not be permitted 4. Furthermore, power limits are to be set so as not to exceed 74DBA at 300 feet in circumference from the source or property line, whichever is closer. 5. The P.A.,system use will be permitted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless otherwise approved by City Council. No lights are permitted on Sunday. ANALYSIS The requested light variance would apply to the three baseball diamonds located at Heritage Park, the two baseball diamonds on the north side of Red Hill Park, the senior field at the Epicenter Sports Complex and the south field at Day Creek Park. Staff requests the City continue with its current policy of providing a curfew light variance only for extended, overtime or extra innings, which is necessary for tournament play. Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director P55 STAFF REPORT ECONOMIC&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L ° J RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Karen Peterson, Planning Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG) FOR THE SELECTION OF A DEVELOPER TO ENTITLE, CONSTRUCT, AND OPERATE A TRANSIT-ORIENTED, MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), acting in its authority as the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission, to guide the selection of a developer to entitle, construct, and operate a transit-oriented, mixed-use development at the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station. BACKGROUND The Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station is located at 11208 Azusa Court at the southwest intersection of Milliken Avenue and the railroad right-of-way. The station area is approximately 10 acres in size and currently developed with the Metrolink Station platform, parking lot with 960 parking stalls, and a pedestrian underpass. Metrolink commuter rail service is provided by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority. In 1993, the City and SANBAG entered into a Cooperative Agreement to define the responsibilities of each agency with respect to the Metrolink Station. Generally, SANBAG is responsible for the railroad track and right-of-way while the City is responsible for the rail station and parking lot. The agreement also defined the ownership of the station site. The City and SANBAG/SCRRA were to hold title as tenants in common to all property that is not essential to railroad operations (railroad track and right-of-way). In 2011, the Cooperative Agreement was amended to define the responsibilities regarding the pedestrian underpass, or tunnel, which had been constructed to provide pedestrian access to the station from the north. The agreement indicates that the City maintains the pedestrian underpass and provide security while SANBAG maintains the structural integrity of the tunnel and the track above it. The City Council has adopted Active Objective N9 to pursue the development of a transit-oriented, mixed residential and commercial project at the Metrolink Station. It is envisioned that a private developer would enter into a long-term lease of the project site with the City and SANBAG and P56 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS June 3, 2015 Page 2 would be responsible for entitling, constructing, and operating the project. The objectives for the project include: • Foster innovative and successful mixed-use, transit-oriented development (TOD) that will act as a catalyst for other TOD development within the City; • Provide high-density housing at densities of 50 dwelling units to the acre; • Partner with or complement the proposed nearby Empire Lakes mixed-use project and provide a direct, multi-modal connection from the project site to the Empire Lakes project site; • Contribute to reducing vehicle miles traveled within the region; • Maintain public parking for the Metrolink Station as an attractive alternative for riders and explore possible resident use of commuter parking areas during non-operating hours; • Integrate successfully into existing and planned development in and around the site; • Implement the City of Rancho Cucamonga's orientation towards a healthy community and the "Healthy RC" program that encourages a healthy and sustainable lifestyle for residents and visitors; • Facilitate economic development; and, • Provide retail and related services that bring new jobs and revenue to the City. Exhibit A of the Cooperative Agreement for the Development of A Transit-Oriented Development at the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station shows early planning concepts for the project. This cooperative agreement will not replace the existing agreement that established responsibilities of each agency. ANALYSIS A Cooperative Agreement (Attachment A) between the City and SANBAG is proposed to describe the process for the selection of a private developer. A two-phased approach is proposed and outlined within the Cooperative Agreement, as follows: • Phase 1: During the first phase, City and SANBAG staff will develop a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) that will be circulated within the development community. Any interested and qualified developers will be invited to submit their qualifications and credentials to demonstrate their capacity to develop and operate the project. A Review Committee comprised of three staff members from each agency will be responsible for reviewing the qualifications. Those developers who are determined by the Review Committee to have sufficient capacity to develop and operate the project will be selected to participate in Phase 2. • Phase 2: During the second phase, City and SANBAG staff will prepare a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a detailed development proposal. The RFP will be sent to those developers that were pre-qualified in Phase 1. Upon the submittal of proposals, the Review P57 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS June 3, 2015 Page 3 Committee comprised of City and SANBAG staff will be responsible for reviewing the proposals and recommending the selection of a developer to the City Council and SANBAG Commuter Rail and Transit Committee and Board of Directors. The Cooperative Agreement includes a schedule that shows the selection of a private developer by the end of this year. After a developer is selected, the City and SANBAG would then intend to enter into a long-term lease and Development Agreement for the entitlement, construction, and operation of the project. The project entitlements would include applications for a General Plan Amendment, Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment, and Design Review and the associated environmental documentation. On May 14, 2015, SANBAG's Commuter Rail and Transit Committee recommended that the SANBAG Board of Directors approve the Cooperative Agreement. The SANBAG Board of Directors is scheduled to consider approval of the Cooperative Agreement on June 3, 2015. Upon execution of the Cooperative Agreement, staff will distribute the RFQ to the development community. Respectf Ily submitted, Candyc Burnett Planning Director CB:KP/Is Attachment A: Cooperative Agreement w/ Project Overview/Conceptual Site Layout Attachment B: Draft Request For Qualifications (RFQ) P58 SAN BAG Contract No. 15-1001271 Cooperative Agreement between San Bernardino County Transportation Commission and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Regarding the Development of A Transit-Oriented Development at the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station Attachment A Page I of 8 Final P59 This cooperative agreement ("Agreement") between the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") and the San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting in its authority as the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission, ("SANBAG") is entered into as of the date approved by both parties. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City and SANBAG intend to enter into a Development Agreement and long-term lease with a private developer to entitle, construct, and operate a transit-oriented, mixed residential and commercial development on the property located adjacent to the Metrolink Station at 11208 Azusa Court, which is generally located at the southwest intersection of the SANBAG owned rail right-of-way operated by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority(aka Metrolink) and Milliken Avenue ("Property"). A map and the legal descriptions describing the Property are attached as Exhibit A, Property Map and Legal Description; and, • WHEREAS, prior to the execution of a Development Agreement with a private developer, the City and SANBAG wish to conduct the selection of a private developer in two phases. During the first phase, the City shall, in cooperation with SANBAG, develop, prepare, and distribute a request for qualifications (RFQ) inviting all interested and qualified parties to submit their qualifications and credentials to the City regarding the development and/or entitlement of the Property. During the second phase, the City shall, in cooperation with SANBAG, develop, prepare, and distribute a request for proposals (RFP) to those developers that are determined to have met the minimum criteria during the first phase to submit a detailed development proposal. Upon the submittal of proposals, the City and SANBAG will jointly participate in the selection of a private developer for development of the project site. At the time a private developer is selected to entitle, construct, and operate a development project, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SANBAG intend to enter into a Development Agreement for the entitlement, construction, and operation of a transit-oriented, mixed residential and commercial development; and, WHEREAS, since the Property is jointly owned by the City and SANBAG, the parties deem it appropriate that the City and SANBAG participate in the selection of the private developer. WHEREAS, the proposed development will at a minimum keep the same number of Metrolink parking spaces as well as allow for three tracks through the station. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF REQUESTS FOR QUALIFICATIONS ("RFQ") AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ("RFP"): The selection of a private developer shall occur in two phases. During the first phase, City employees shall, in cooperation with SANBAG employees, develop, prepare, and Page 2 of 8 Final P60 distribute a request for qualifications (RFQ) inviting all interested and qualified parties to submit their qualifications and credentials to the City regarding the development and/or entitlement of the Property. During the second phase, City employees shall, in cooperation with SANBAG employees, develop, prepare, and distribute a request for proposals (RFP) to those developers that are determined to have met the minimum criteria during the first phase to submit a detailed development proposal. Both the RFQ and RFP shall incorporate the preliminary planning concepts described and depicted in Exhibit A of this agreement, including a depiction of the location of the third track within the existing Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) railroad right-of-way. Upon the submittal of proposals and recommendations from City staff, SANBAG staff, the Commuter Rail and Transit Committee, the City Council and SANBAG Board of Directors will select a private developer for development of the project site, as described in Paragraph 5 of this agreement. 2. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS: The City and SANBAG shall act in the capacity of independent contractors and this Agreement shall not be construed to constitute a joint venture, partnership or any other legal relationship that shares liabilities and benefits unless specifically set forth in this Agreement. 3. COSTS: Each party shall bear its own costs with respect to its duties and responsibilities under this Agreement. 4. SCHEDULE: a. City shall issue the RFQ no later than June 8, 2015, which shall require responses to be submitted no later than July 20, 2015. b. Review of the responses and selection of the best-qualified developers as determined jointly by the CITY and SANBAG shall be completed no later than August 6, 2015. c. City shall issue the RFP no later than August 10, 2015, which shall require responses to be submitted no later than September 21, 2015. d. Review of the responses and recommendation of the best-qualified developers as determined jointly by the CITY and SANBAG shall be completed no later than October 15, 2015. e. The above dates may be extended as needed by written agreement between the City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the SANBAG Director of Transit and Rail Programs. 5. SELECTION OF CANDIDATES: All responses to the RFQ and RFP will be subject to a review process developed by the CITY and SANBAG, including: a. The evaluations will be based on the written responses, but may also include follow up interviews of the proposer's key personnel and/or employees and visits to developments created by the proposers. b. A Review Committee will be established comprised of three (3) City employees appointed by the City Manager and from one (1) to three (3) Page 3 of Final P61 SANBAG employees to review all responses to the RFQ and RFP and conduct any interviews and investigations. c. After reviewing responses to the RFQ and conducting any appropriate follow up interviews and investigations, the Review Committee shall determine which developers should be invited to respond to the RFP for a detailed development proposal. In selecting a developer to submit a RFP, primary consideration shall be given to the following: • Professional qualifications, experience, and capability of the development team, including experience in: o Development, ownership, and management of mixed-use, urban in- fill transit-oriented projects; o Public/private partnerships involving mixed-use commercial and residential developments and parking structures; o Processing development entitlements and obtaining approvals and permits for developments; o Private and public real estate acquisition; and, o Finance/pro forma analysis. • Financial capacity to complete the project. • Record of ability and experience with similar type projects. • Demonstration of an innovative vision for the project. d. After reviewing responses to the RFP and conducting any appropriate follow up interviews and investigations, representatives from the Review Committee will make a recommendation to the City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SANBAG's Commuter Rail and Transit Committee regarding the best-qualified private developer. Primary consideration shall be given to the highest rate-of-return to the City and SANBAG, effectiveness, experience and financial capability of the proposer to perform based on demonstrated past performance, reference checks and other information in the possession of or accessible to the City and SANBAG. Additionally, strong consideration shall be given to proposers who can demonstrate the experience, competence, dependability and ability to: • Implement the project concepts described and depicted in Exhibit A; • Foster innovative and successful mixed-use, transit-oriented development (TOD) that will act as a catalyst for other TOD development within the City; • Provide high-density housing at densities of 50 dwelling units to the acre; • Provide retail and services that provides new jobs and revenue to the City; Page 4 of 8 Final P62 • Partner with or complement the proposed nearby Empire Lakes mixed- use project and provide a direct, multi-modal connection from the project site to the Empire Lakes project site; • Contribute to reducing vehicle miles traveled within the region; • Maintain public parking for the Metrolink Station as an attractive alternative for riders and explore possible resident use of commuter parking areas during non-operating hours; • Integrate successfully into existing and planned development in and around the site; • Facilitate economic development; • Provide retail and services that provides new jobs and revenue to the City; and, • Implement the City of Rancho Cucamonga's orientation towards a healthy community and the "Healthy RC" program that encourages a healthy and sustainable lifestyle for residents and visitors. e. Final selection of the successful private developer will be by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council prior to any action taken by SANBAG's Board of Directors to select a developer. Following the final selection of a private developer by the City Council and SANBAG, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SANBAG intend to enter into a Development Agreement with the private developer for the entitlement, construction, and operation of the development project. 6. STATE AND LOCAL LAWS: The selection of a developer shall be developed and distributed in compliance with all state and local laws and regulations. 7. TERMINATION: Either party may terminate this Agreement with 30 days notice to the other. Each party will bear its own costs. 8. NO SUBCONTRACTING: The City will not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement unless specifically authorized in writing by SANBAG. 9. HOLD HARMLESS: a. The City agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by SANBAG) and hold harmless SANBAG and its officers, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability arising out of its obligations under this Agreement. The City's indemnification obligation shall survive the termination of the Agreement. b. SANBAG agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, volunteers from any and all claims, actions or losses, damages, and/or liability resulting from the SANBAG's acts or omissions which arise from SANBAG's performance Page 5 of 8 Final P63 of its obligations under this Agreement. SANBAG's indemnification obligation shall survive the termination of the Agreement. c. In the event the City and/or SANBAG is found to be comparatively at fault for any claim, action, loss or damage which results from their respective obligations under this Agreement, the City and/or SANBAG shall indemnify the other to the extent of its comparative fault. d. Furthermore, if the City or SANBAG attempts to seek recovery from the other for Workers Compensation benefits paid to an employee, the City and SANBAG agree that any alleged negligence of the employee shall not be construed against the employer of that employee. 10. INCORPORATION OF PRIOR AGREEMENT: This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties hereto with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Agreement, and no prior agreement or understanding pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose. 11. WAIVERS: No waiver by either party of any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision hereof or of any subsequent breach by either party of the same or any other provisions. 12. AMENDMENTS: No provision of this Agreement may be amended or added to except by an agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto or their respective successor in interest, expressing by its terms an intention to modify this license. 13. SUCCESSORS: This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. 14. EXHIBITS: All exhibits referred to are attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference. 15. CAPTIONS AND COVER PAGE: The paragraph captions and the cover page of this Agreement shall have no effect on its interpretations. 16. SEVERANCE: If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be void by any court of competent jurisdiction, then such determination shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement, and all such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect provided, however, that the purpose of the Agreement is not frustrated. It is the intention of the parties hereto that if any provision of this Agreement is capable of two constructions, one of which would render the provision void and the other of which would render the provision valid, then the provision shall have the meaning which renders it valid. 17. NOTICES: Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party, or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail. Any such Page 6 of 8 Final P64 notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Notice shall be deemed communicated two (2) City working days from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this paragraph. CITY's address: City Manager Attention: John Gillison 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91730 SANBAG's address: Mitchell A. Alderman, PE Director of Transit and Rail Programs 1170 W. 3rd Street, 2nd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92410 18. SURVIVAL: The obligations of the parties, which, by their nature, continue beyond the term of this Agreement, will survive the termination of this Agreement. 19. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS: If any legal action is instituted to enforce or declare any party's rights hereunder, each party, including the prevailing party, must bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This paragraph shall not apply to those costs and attorneys' fees directly arising from any third party legal action against a party hereto and payable under Paragraph 9, HOLD HARMLESS. 20. MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION: a. If during the course of the administration of this Agreement, the City determines that SANBAG has made a material misstatement or misrepresentation or that materially inaccurate information has been provided to the City, this Agreement may be immediately terminated. If this Agreement is terminated according to this provision, the City is entitled to pursue any available legal remedies. b. If during the course of the administration of this Agreement, SANBAG determines that the City has made a material misstatement or misrepresentation or that materially inaccurate information has been provided to SANBAG, this Agreement may be immediately terminated. If this Agreement is terminated according to this provision, the SANBAG is entitled to pursue any available legal remedies. 21. INTERPRETATIONS: As this Agreement was jointly prepared by both parties, the language in all parts of this Agreement shall be construed, in all cases, according to its fair meaning, and not for or against either party hereto. Page of Final P65 22. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORS: Both parties to this Agreement represent that the persons executing this Agreement are fully authorized to sign this Agreement to bind their respective party. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor Dated: SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS, acting in its authority as the County of San Bernardino Transportation Commission President, Board of Directors Dated: Exhibit A: Project Concepts Page 8 of 8 Final P66 Transit-Oriented Development at the Metrolink Station Project Concept: A joint effort by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, SANBAG, and a private developer to entitle, co struct, and operate an active and vibrant transit-oriented, mixed residential and commercial development through a long-term lease of the property located adjacent to the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station at 11208 Azusa Court. • Attached, high-density residential (i.e., minimum of 50 dwelling units per acre and 4 to 5 stories) to encourage transit rid- ership and reduce vehicle miles traveled; estimated unit count is 500. • Minimum of 15,000 square feet of retail and commercial service uses to serve residents and attract visitors;will front onto and activate the central plaza. • Mix of residential and commercial uses either in a vertical or horizontal configuration that"wraps"the parking. • Engaging, high-quality public space,such as a central plaza,with a direct connection to the rail platform. • "Wrapped" single or multiple parking structures that accommodate a minimum of 960 parking spaces for Metrolink riders and a sufficient amount of parking for commercial tenants and residents. The potential for shared parking/overnight use and leasing of Metrolink parking spaces by residents of the project, as well as adjacent developments,will be explored. • Retention of the City's paid parking permit system for Metrolink riders,which began in July 2014. • Relocation of the rail platform approximately 25 feet to the south within the existing rail right-of-way to accommodate a third railroad track,which will need to be verified. • Direct, multi-modal connection to the adjacent high density, mixed-use, and transit-oriented Empire Lakes project that is being planned now. . f f'; 'a. , .„ a `� ,mss' - ; ' .: High density residential over ground floor retail facing a central 4 s� -=�_I. .� plaza near the transit platform , .. Mom . rt t it■ ' ,.....,.1 - • . 'Y / ' .� M .[ii •' L ' i1i/ r, P • _• j •• A Li 15t am lit Parking"hidden"behind residential and retail uses. .e . :44;:„:4114;1 ,+- r , �■M� �1,h . ..a. r ; _ . 4j IA' • ,,_ � :, mom. ' ,‘, . 1. `. * . ' "Seamless"and multi-modal connection to adjacent transit- . ii' J /•,...., 4,.,$), .,1,,... , %., ,..,..06.."�,� � � oriented development in Empire Lakes. J' P67 a w u ON, C Y,0,E, •7 I . tit O1.r o(`m c aim?E�o�i �rnvW u 0 VFW .:C.. 1,+.'` ' -1... k4 " I. N. 4., ..... gm - -. i,[ a 4. C o1O' ti1 J.� ♦. 1 K ice + 1 �s,R' - • 9 a L b• V! 4 r♦1y . • . ;♦ e�o !4 �•. w . • . siSi .. [, �►-W m�O�A}` b C) ,'W' �••.y'v i E c 1 a. z .s 11�. ,y,• Z9 a .. ♦,•0 i 1 s1� Pri8 " -b 4 .. OK s u .i ce •` :?2.- -• $ H- 'a i Sip Y. Y. ..� f �, _ G3 • o r -�. L+ ;F •. ?.,7� '� cwla :t 1.O C v �1 - 'I� yi• ., :ti' . a.�4LLm';C t• 1 it. O it c by� Iii.as c ; '1gW }I .4 , �. 1 •ti,; ,� `'�-- We .. ' •�+ � � y 'a cn � : ' + ja l/ 7 • 4_, 1 O — o r E 1 a) dit ; j; iiti_iuiP4;:##::::o c K s '' - \ W CU O M V! VVV a �, to lo t .. • •V. e 0 ., c, '= e 3.. t o crD# 00 • • pj 1 1 a I •'CO CZ II r-C d r r,11- 1`•,, c2 `�. 1 -- t ✓ O,iV Y •.,,,_s Q1,o.� • �_ •.� _ �1Cr, 7 w 2444 x444 iirri . �� 'a :- ) ii • S�t ce pia+ 2 f t t« N • • M •r %or iv}Y }S J j .•10 • • m•rm It OP t � ' ?�' p II - Or .... N ny i'1�' }rr aE Imo ..::.::' WE 4A _!,,, - 4_ ■ __ �_ - V a ro o i� m c w oa .. '• _----' A 4. .. * 1641 •44 may[ m .7 .. a._ m Ilt. � o • •. • • u'c E• . u ` i � o : _ Sio c • cs • . r '-? r W.E a � 7. i ,` t'•} U �w r R - , $ :2 u C • N c r p • A c iv .11 v • u— i c W u o rdr W 1.40r,R_ z 9 f P68 CI's\ 04rti w..), ct„ 04 it i .." ,.."14 , I ^r of < RANCH{? .: . CUCAMONGA % . r REQUEST FOR, QUALIFICATIONS s_.a. FOR ,'(A-TRANSIT-ORIENTED MIXED'''USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT \ \,,,\ '-`,, AT THE MILLIKEN METROLINK STATION IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 Deadline for Submissions: July 20,2015 at 5:00 p.m. Attachment B P69 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) are seeking statements of qualifications from qualified development entities for the development of an approximately 10-acre site adjacent to the Milliken Avenue Metrolink Station located at 11208 Azusa Court (Exhibit A). The City and SANBAG are seeking an experienced development team to build a catalytic transit-oriented development that will provide housing,retail,and neighborhood services in close proximity to an existing rail transit stop. The procurement of a development team for this unique opportunity will include a two-part process: the first part will include a review of the Statement of Qualifications, which will be ranked and prequalified according to the experience and financial capacity of the development team in developing similar projects. The second part will include the City/SANBAG extending an)nvitation to the top-ranked, prequalified development teams to submit a full development proposal-in response to a Request for Proposals to be developed by the City/SANBAG. Upon selection of a development-feat-1i and execution of authorizing documents, the team will be responsible for processingdevelopmententitlements, obtaining approvals and permits,construction,and operation of the development. ABOUT RANCHO CUCAMONGA: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a suburban community located in southwestern San Bernardino County in Southern California. The City is borderedby-the cities of,Upland, Ontario, and Fontana to the west, south, and east, respectively. To the'north°is the San Gabriel^,Mountain range. The City's early development was characterized by agricultural activity that dominated,the region during the late 1800's and early 1900's. The cultivation of citrus andgrapes were the:principal agricultural activities in the area that would later become the°City,of'Rancho Cucamonga The,Cityoriginally developed as three distinct communities. Alta Loina,tucamonga and Etiwanda These communities were generally located in what would become the City's.northwest, southwest, and northeast "quadrants", respectively. With the goal of establishing a quality coMmunity,_thesepthree communities joined together and incorporated as a city \ in 1977. ✓ °`�-. �'� "=a f j Since the City's incorporation.n 1977,the population'has grown 350 percent and features widespread residential,commercial, and`mdustrial development. Encompassing 50 square miles within its corporate boundaries and'sphere-of-influence,Rancho Cucamonga has a total population of 172,269(CA DOF,2014) and an employment base with moreAthan 72,000 jobs. There are a wide range of residential,commercial,and industrial land uses within the City that serve both the local and regional populatipn.`The majority of the City's residential land uses are located within the three aforementioned communities. Commercial land uses are distributed throughout the City along its major streets including Foothill Boulevard(historic US Route 66),Base Line Road,Archibald Avenue,Haven Avenue, and Milliken Avenue. The City's industrial land uses are generally located south of Foothill Boulevard and in the City's southeast"quadrant". The City is strategically located in the west Inland Empire with excellent access to regional multi-modal transportation facilities, including three freeways(Interstate 10 and 15 and State Route 210)and arterial roadways,multi-purpose trails,Ontario International Airport,and Metrolink passenger rail service on the San Bernardino Line that connects San Bernardino to Union Station in Los Angeles. P70 CONTEXT FOR DEVELOPMENT: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and SANBAG own two parcels totaling approximately ten (10) acres adjacent to the Southern California Regional Rail Authority railroad right-of-way. A Metrolink Station is located at 11208 Azusa Court, which is generally located at the southwest intersection of the SCRRA rail line and Milliken Avenue. These parcels comprise the development site and are generally located at the southwestern intersection of the SCRRA right-of-way and Milliken Avenue. These parcels currently accommodate 960 parking stalls for rail passengers,which are maintained by the City in cooperation with the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). The City/SANBAG would like to create a catalytic, transit-oriented and mixed-use development that capitalizes on the proximity of the Metrolink Station. Operated by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Metrolink is a regional rail system that provides reliable transportation and mobility for the region. The City is served by the San Bernardino Line,which links 5anBernardino to Union Station in Los Angeles with nineteen(19)trains operating daily on weekdaysYten(10)trains on Saturdays,and seven(7) trains on Sundays. SANBAG is seeking to establish the viability of transitsoriented development along the Metrolink corridor in San Bernardino County and it-is anticipated that this'project could serve as a model for other communities. t {\\ In the immediate vicinity of the Metrolink Station and to the south of the station public parking lots, there is approximately 96,000 square feet of.office and retail development and an overflow parking lot on approximately 12 acres. To the south of;tfiese developments is an existing residential apartment community. To the east across Milliken Avve ueare'industrial developments and to the west is the 160- acre Empire Lakes Golf Course. 1 �� An effort to plan for the ev�entua\d\elop entofthe Em pi Lakes Golf Course is currently underway by Lewis Group of Companies. Known informally as Empire Lakes", the Lewis Group of Companies envisions a large, transit-oriented and mixed-use development with approximately 220,000 square feet of non-residential uses and 3,450 residential units on ttie former golf course. /C To the south of the—project site withindhe City ofOntario is the Citizens Bank Area,Ontario Mills Mall,and the Piemonte at Ontario Center, which envisions the.development of 830,000 square feet of mixed use development(retail,entertinment,theater, hotel, market, residential, and office uses)over the next 15 years. This area is south of`Fourth Street between Haven Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway, and is approximately loll Y2 miles from the Metrolink Station. Four miles to the south from the Metrolinnk Station is the Ontario International Airport on Haven Avenue and East Airport Drive. The general area aroundI a develo1pment site is characterized by a mix of uses, including residential, commercial, and industrial\Within a three mile radius of the development site, there is a resident population of 96,608 with an average household income of$80,852. Within a five mile radius,the resident population is 279,515 and the average household income is$83,837. The City enjoys a robust business community. The top employers within the City are shown in the table below. COMPANY #OF EMPLOYEES Chaffey Community College 1,229 Etiwanda School District 1,058 Amphastar Pharmaceutical 880 P71 Inland Empire Health Plan 850 Southern California Edison 800 Alta Loma School District 623 - Vocational Improvement Program 603 Central School District 527 City of Rancho Cucamonga 455 Lexxiom, Inc. 360 Law Enforcement/Investigations 358 Tamco Steel 350 Bauch& Lomb ..x''330 Pneumatic Scale Anglus Company , / . /325 Cucamonga School District i+\265 Nongshim r 250 Bass Pro Shop r `238; Mission Foods ` ,;! 206\- ADP \ 200 4 Flight `'a;a\ /2->, 200 Ameron Concrete°&.Steel Pipe 4f :'/7 200 UPS Mail Innovation s;Inc. . c 200 Office Intrnal ADTSISther ':, 179 t '`ate DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY. \ f . ,,� The City of Rancho Cucamo� and SANBAG are interested in entering into a joint venture with a private development team to d vel p and operate a mixed'use transit-oriented development. The City envisions entering into a long term lease of the site to;facilitate the project. The objective for or this'development include the following: \ .` o x • Foster'innovative and'successful`mixed-use,transit-oriented development(TOD)that will act as a catalyst for other TOD development within the City; • Provide high-density housing/at densities of 50 dwelling units to the acre; • Provide retail and services that provides new jobs and revenue to the City; • Partner with oi-co?nplement/the proposed nearby Empire Lakes mixed-use project and provide a direct, multi-modal connection from the project site to the Empire Lakes project site; • Contribute to reducing vehicle miles traveled within the region; • Maintain public parking for the Metrolink Station as an attractive alternative for riders and explore possible resident use of commuter parking areas during non-operating hours; • Integrate successfully into existing and planned development in and around the site; • Facilitate economic development; • Provide retail and services that creates new jobs and revenue for the City; and, • Implement the City of Rancho Cucamonga's orientation towards a healthy community and the "Healthy RC" program that encourages a healthy and sustainable lifestyle for residents and visitors. P72 Based on the objectives,the anticipated project components include the following: • Attached, high-density residential uses(i.e., minimum of 50 dwelling units per acre); • Direct, multi-modal connection to the adjacent high density, mixed-use, and transit-oriented Empire Lakes project that is being planned now; • Minimum of 15,000 square feet of retail and commercial service uses; • Mix of the desired uses either in a vertical or horizontal configuration; • Single or multiple parking structures that accommodate 960 parking spaces for Metrolink riders and a sufficient amount of parking for commercial tenants and residents. The potential for shared parking and overnight use of Metrolink parking by residents can be explored. In addition,the City will explore the option of providing funding from various,sources for the purpose of providing parking for this project as well as the adjacent highCd nsity product on the anticipated redevelopment of Empire Lakes Golf Course;and, • Retention of the City's paid parking permit system.forfyietrolink riders,which began in July 2014. , This system is enforced on weekdays from 5:O0-a.'mi to 7:00p mk Monthly permits are $25 for residents and $30 for non-residents;daily permitsare$4.50. this revenue could be used as one funding stream to service public/private bondsfor'the construction.ota.parking structure. These preliminary concepts are also described and depicted on Attachment A to:this RFQ. The City and SANBAG are also exploring the level,of interest of adjacent 'property owners\to,participate in the development program that will be developed. if there is`interest, the opportunity to to provide a single parking structure that addresses the majority'of;parking needs for all existing and proposed developments at the Metrolink Station and the transit,oriented,developments envisioned at Empire Lakes will be explored further. This may,allow.for further intensification of the properties that would be involved while sharing the responsibility for meeting the associated parking-demands:-The City and SANBAG envision being partners in the devefopment of the parking structure The City is formulating new mixed us °ande transit-oriented development standards to facility higher density developm ne fthat will'be attracti've:to new investment, revitalize neighborhoods, accommodate additional housing, and reduce dependence unPn,automobiles. The City anticipates this planning effort will be'completed by the'end`of 2015 and, to the extent feasible, the selected development team will actively participate in this process,as a primary stakeholder. "t:� ' \` The City has also participated irnthe development of the long range plans for Omnitrans' Route 61. Omnitrans is a publctransit agency serving the San Bernardino Valley that operates local and express bus routes. Route 61 provides service along Holt Boulevard and 4th Street, which passes through the Cities of Pomona, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, and Fontana. The route includes major destination points including: Ontario Intern tional Airport, the Ontario Convention Center, Ontario Mills Mall,three Metrolink Stations including Rancho Cucamonga's, Victoria Gardens, and Kaiser Permanente Hospital. The project description consists of a Rapid Bus service(non-dedicated-lane BRT)that includes: limited stop service,frequent headways,Transit Signal Priority,distinct branding,enhanced stations with lighting,improved pedestrian/bike connections and it is expected to increase ridership by 30 percent.The City sees this as an exciting opportunity to increase ridership in conjunction with the potential redevelopment of the Metrolink Station site. The City is also currently in the process of preparing a "Circulation Master Plan for Bicyclists and Pedestrians (CMP)." This assistance would include the comprehensive analysis of appropriate City P73 documents and incorporate policies and opportunities to support pedestrian and bicycling opportunities consistent with the General Plan. With this project, there is an opportunity to improve connectivity to destinations,such as the Metrolink Station via bicycling or walking. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: At a minimum,SOQs should include the following components and information: 1. Letter of Interest. Provide a cover letter expressing your interest in the project and introducing the development team. Include name,address,phone number,and email address of the primary contact and identify the role of this person. //2 2. Development Team. For each entity included in the development team, provide the following information: • Name,address,telephone number, ande ail address of contact person; • Type of entity(e.g., individual,company,corporation,etc.); • Principals and their roles within the't ain; • Relationships with parent corporations;subsidiari es,joint ventures,etc.,. \ / • Key project personneltincluding resumes describing relevant project experience and specific technical skills. Minimum information should include the individual's education, certificates, degrees,schools and dates and work 3. Legal Entity. Desnbe.the legal entity with which the.City would contract including the structure of the anticipated.partnership�agreement(s)and ownership interests in the project. 4. Qualifications. Describe the development teams qualifications and experience related to each of tthe.iteriisbelow\: •r Ent I ment,"c ;uction,ownership„and management of mixed-use,urban infill transit- \� oriented projects; A�� • Public/private \jiarrtnerships\ involving mixed-use commercial and residential \developments and parking structures; • Processing development entitlements and obtaining approvals and permits for developments; l' ) • Private andpubIic real estate acquisition;and, • Finance/pro forma analysis. 5. Experience with Similar Projects: Provide a list of at least five(5)or more similar projects that the development team has successfully completed. For each project, provide the following information: • Description of the project; • Project location; • Total cost; • Land uses,tenants,and the level of pre-leasing or sales at opening; • Length of time to complete and completion dates; P74 • Method of financing; • Explanation of each development team member's role; • Name and contact information for the public entity partner; and, • Project holding period following completion. 6. Financial Strength and Capacity. Provide the following information: • Audited financial statements or balance sheets and income and expense statements for each separate entity on the development team. This information should be provided in a sealed envelope and will be kept confidential sent directly to the City Attorney; • Assessment of the development team's access to capital; • Names and addresses of at least two commercial or institutional credit references, and one reference from a municipality and/or public entity; • • A letter authorizing each reference to respond to inquiries from the City;and, • Terms and conditions of any significant.contingentliabilities, such as major litigation, guaranteed loans or other obligations or potential obligations that could adversely affect the development team's ability to mplete the project. '\\ In addition,the development team will need'to provide the following information: \ �/ • A description of how the development team has'financed developments of similar type and scope; \\'''\ \\ • The development team's access to,sources of financing, both equity and debt; • Any public subsidies proposeddfor development of the project;and, • A description of how the developmennt'team expects to1handle unanticipated budget ncreaseess.0 / ---... .� / \� 7. References. Please;provide at least two(2)general references for similar projects. 8. Deve• lopment Vision: Provide a brief narrative explaining the development team's plan for development ofthe proojectsite,including:. N V• Developmen,„7.\vision;and;t • Proposed development program, including land uses, sizes, amenities, and special features. \\ Ten (10) copies of the Statement of Qualifications(SOQ) must be received in person or by mail in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, July 20. 2015. Late proposals will not be considered. Proposals should be addressed to: Karen Peterson, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 • P75 EVALUATION: Each proposal will be evaluated by the City and SANBAG, based on the following criteria: • Conciseness,clarity,and responsiveness to the information requested. • Professional qualifications, experience, and capability of the development team, including experience in: o Development, ownership, and management of mixed-use, urban infill transit-oriented projects; o Public/private partnerships involving mixed use commercial and residential developments and parking structures; o Processing development entitlements and obtaining approvals and permits for developments; (/ o Private and public real estate acquisition;.and, o Finance/pro forma analysis. (/ • Financial capacity to complete the project`, N\ • Record of ability and experience with similar type.projects. • Demonstration of an innovative vision for the project./ / The City and SANBAG will review the O\tare submitted\hose development teams that are determined to have met the minimum criteria will•be invited to submit a detailed development proposal in response to a subsequentRequest for Proposals (RFP). The RFP will be released at a future date and provide more specific details and requirements far development of theproject site. _ QUESTIONS: \ '`,`\/ Please submit-all-questionss in writingZ-laren.Peterson@CityofRC.us no later than June 15, 2015. Written re ponses will,be provided via e-mail to.all` onsultants who submit questions by June 22, 2015. Pages 76 - 81 have been removed P82 STAFF REPORT PIANNINGDEPARTME[VT ;; � 141.0 Date: June 3, 2015 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager • From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Development Code to provide a floor area ratio (FAR) for hotels and motels (only) in order to allow more flexibility in the size of these types of uses/developments located within the City. Related file: Development Review DRC2014-00232. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879, adopt Ordinance 874 and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. BACKGROUND: On April 8, 2015, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved Development Review DRC2014-00232 for the construction of a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet with 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street (Attachment C). The Commission reviewed and recommended that the City Council approve the subject Development Code amendment (Attachment B) that is associated with the Development Review application. Approval of the Development Review application is contingent on the approval of this Development Code Amendment by the City Council. ANALYSIS: General: Per Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) permitted in the Industrial Park (IP) District is 0.60 (60 percent). Floor area ratio (FAR) is defined in Section 17.126.020 of the Development Code and illustrated in Figure 17.126.020-6 of the Development Code as the ratio between gross floor area of the primary structure(s) on a site and gross site area [and] includes all floors [that could be occupied] of a building, making it a three-dimensional unit of measure (Exhibit J of Attachment A). The FAR is determined by dividing the combined floor area of the building by the gross area of the parcel. Within the Industrial Districts, the floor area ratio functions as the principal means to prevent a project site from being "over-built" and result in excessive building size and/or incompatibility with adjacent structures, land uses, and associated improvements. For example, manufacturing and logistics uses generally require a simple, single-story floor plan with a building footprint that is basically a rectangle in order to operate efficiently. These requirements preclude design solutions such as articulated wall planes and architectural embellishments that could normally be used to reduce the apparent visual bulk of a building. In contrast, however, as the operational characteristics of hotels and motels are P83 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 —CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 3, 2015 Page 2 significantly different, there is greater flexibility that can be applied to the architecture. Furthermore, a hotel is usually comprised of multiple stories. Therefore, a project site improved with a hotel would not appear as "over-built" as it would with an industrial building that has a similar floor area. Per Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, hotels and motels are permitted (or conditionally permitted) in six (6) development districts in'the City: Mixed Use (MU), Office Professional (OP), General Commercial (GC), Regional Related Commercial (RRC), Commercial Office (CO), and Industrial Park (IP) (Exhibit K of Attachment A). The FAR varies among these development districts as shown below: Development District Maximum Floor Area Ratio Mixed Use (MU) no maximum Office Professional (OP) 40% - 100% General Commercial (GC) 25% - 35% Regional Related Commercial (RRC) no maximum Commercial Office (CO) (see note 2) Industrial Park (IP)' 40% - 60% 1: Per Table LU-17 of the General Plan,within the Haven Avenue Overlay District the maximum FAR is 1.0 2: The Commercial Office (CO) District FAR is not defined in the Development Code The majority of the hotels and motels in the City are in the Industrial Park (IP) District. In order to ensure that opportunities for the development of hotels and motels are maximized in the Industrial Park (IP) District, and make the floor area ratio requirements that apply to hotel and motel uses consistent with some of the other Development Districts, it is proposed that the Development Code be amended so that hotels and motels will be subject to a maximum floor area ratio of 1.0 (100 percent) within the Industrial Park (IP) District. The section of the Code that will be amended is Table 17.36.040-1 and will read as shown in Attachment E. These amendments will apply to hotels and motels only, and only within the Industrial Park (IP) District (Attachment F). They will not change any of the technical standards (building setbacks, building height, parking requirements, landscape coverage, etc.), design standards (architecture, site design, etc.), allowable land uses, and/or performance standards (noise, odors, hazardous materials, etc.) that currently apply within the subject District. The performance standards that apply to the Industrial Park (IP) District are the most restrictive of the performance standards that apply to the Industrial Districts. Although this amendment is associated with a site-specific project, the adoption of this amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any future hotel or motel located on other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) District, and the analysis of the environmental impacts as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). When the applications for future projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) caused by future projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, air quality (including greenhouse gases) and hydrology/water quality, geology and soils, cultural resources and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public • P84 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 3, 2015 Page 3 notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. The comment period for the Notice of Intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was from March 2, 2014 to April 8, 2015. During the comment period, staff received comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). In response to the comment letter received, staff added a condition of approval for Development Review DRC2014-00232 to address potential impacts to nesting birds noted by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. It is important to note that none of the comments received required modification or the addition of Mitigation Measures or recirculation of the Initial Study. Also, none of the comments received were directly germane to the proposed Development Code Amendment that is before the City Council. Future projects that are submitted to the City for.review as result of the Development Code Amendment will evaluated independently under CEQA for potential impacts. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. Respectfully submitted, • ' . • Candyce Bur tt Planning Director CB:MS/Is Attachment A— Planning Commission Staff Report, dated April 8, 2015 (with all attachments) Attachment B— Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-27 for Development Review DRC2014-00232 Attachment C— Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-26 Recommending Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 Attachment D- Table 17.36.040-1 - Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts (with the FAR range that applies to all development in the Industrial Districts) Attachment E- Draft Table 17.36.040-1 (with the revisions to the maximum FAR that will apply to hotels/motels in the Industrial Districts) Attachment F— Parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) District Draft Ordinance for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 P85 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: April 8, 2015 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00877 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan to provide a floor area ratio (FAR) for hotels and motels (only) in order to allow more flexibility in the size of these types of uses/developments located within the City. Related files: Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 and Development Review DRC2014-00232. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Development Code to provide a floor area ratio (FAR) for hotels and motels (only) in order in order to allow more flexibility in the size of these types of uses/developments located within the City. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Review DRC2014-00232. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 — WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. - A proposal to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet with 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street; APN: 0229-341- 11. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; • Adopt the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879; • Adopt the Resolution approving Development Review DRC2014-00232 contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment. ATTACHMENT A P86 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879, AND DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Offices for California Highway Patrol (CHP); Industrial Park (IP) District South - Hotel; Industrial Park (IP) District East - Industrial Office Building and Hotel; Industrial Park (IP) District West - Hotel; Industrial Park (IP) District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site — Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a parcel with an approximate area of 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street (Exhibit B). The parcel is 289 feet (east-west) by 308 feet (north-south). The parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses/shrubs. The project site is bound on the north by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station. To the south and west are hotels (Towne Place Suites by Marriot and Holiday Inn Express). To the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue, is an industrial office building and another hotel (Homewood Suites by Hilton). The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding it is Industrial Park (IP) District. The property and the properties to the east, west, and south are also within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,050 feet and 1,046 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms. The hotel will operate as a Fairfield Inn and Suites by Marriot. The entrance and main lobby area will be located at the east side of the building. There will be two points of access — one via an existing driveway that is shared with the property to the north and another driveway that will be constructed at the southeast corner of the property. The parking field will be located on the east and west sides of the project site. Landscape coverage is 16.6 percent; the minimum requirement is 15 percent for this Development District. Consistent with other hotels, there will be a recreational area including a pool at the west side of the building. Although there is a wall along the north property line, no new walls are proposed along the south or west property lines. The architecture will be relatively unique for this location and the City overall. Unlike the surrounding hotels that were approved and constructed within the last 10 years that have elements incorporated into their design that were derived from traditional architectural themes, the architecture of the proposed hotel will be more contemporary. The footprint of the hotel has significant horizontal movement which causes the planes of the exterior walls to be significantly articulated. As a result, the hotel will appear as a series of multiple 'blocks' (as opposed to a single block) that reduces the visual mass of the building. Reinforcing this impression will be a mix of finishes including stucco, stackstone veneer, and cement board siding, and a mix of P87 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879, AND DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 3 • colors. Glazing will be the principal element at the main entrance. Although the roofline is flat, vertical articulation will be incorporated by undulating the parapet. At the main entrance there will be a curved, metal canopy that, in addition to establishing the location of the entrance, will provide weather protection and shade. The canopy will be supported by a single, over-sized pillar finished with a stackstone veneer. At the top of the parapet at the same general location at the main entrance there will be another metal (decorative) canopy. Each block will have prominent score lines accented with a contrasting color. Distinguishing details include the alternating color scheme at the blocks located at the northeast and southwest corners of the building and the dark gray stucco finish at the horizontal midpoint of the hotel's east and west elevations and along the first floor. B. Floor Area Analysis: The proposed hotel has a floor area of 60,989 square feet. As the area of the project site is about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres), the building will have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 67 percent (60,989/91,000 = 0.67). As the FAR of the proposed hotel exceeds the maximum FAR of 0,60 (60 percent) that is permitted in the Industrial Park (IP) District per Figure LU-2 of the General Plan and Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code, applications to amend both the General Plan and Development Code (Related files: DRC2014-00877 and DRC2014-00879, respectively, and discussed further below) are being presented to the Commission in order to establish a higher maximum FAR that will be specific to hotels and motels. C. Parking Calculations: Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking requirement for hotels is one parking stall per unit/room and two parking stalls for the manager/employees. The required parking for the proposed hotel is 107 parking stalls; 108 parking stalls will be provided. D. Technical Review Committee: The proposed project was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on November 18, 2014. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommended approval. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Design Review Committee: The proposed project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) on November 18, 2014 (Exhibit H). The Committee generally accepted the proposal. However, the Committee deferred making a recommendation to a follow-up Design Review Committee meeting as they wanted the applicant to slightly revise the paint scheme, and provide for closer examination a sample of one of the materials (a dark gray tile) that was proposed to be applied to the exterior of the building. The applicant presented the revised color scheme and provided the sample as requested at the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) meeting on December 16, 2014 (Exhibit I). The Committee accepted the revision and deemed the tile acceptable and recommend approval. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877/Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879: As noted previously, the FAR of the proposed hotel exceeds the maximum FAR of 0.60 (60 percent) that is permitted in the Industrial Park (IP) District per Figure LU-2 and page LU-17 of the General Plan, and Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code. Floor area ratio (FAR) is defined in Section 17.126.020 of the Development Code and illustrated in Figure 17.126.020-6 of the Development Code as the ratio between gross floor area of the primary structure(s) on a site and gross site area [and] includes all floors [that could be occupied] of a building, making it a three-dimensional unit of measure (Exhibit J). The FAR is determined by dividing the combined floor area of the building by the gross area of the parcel. P88 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879, AND DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 4 Within the Industrial Districts, the floor area ratio functions as the principal means to prevent a project site from being 'over-built" and result in excessive building size and/or incompatibility with adjacent structures, land uses, and associated improvements. Manufacturing and logistics uses generally require a simple, single-story floor plan with a building footprint that is basically a rectangle in order to operate efficiently. These requirements preclude design solutions such as articulated wall planes and architectural embellishments that could normally be used to reduce the apparent visual bulk of a building. However, as the operational characteristics of hotels and motels is significantly different, there is greater flexibility that can be applied to the architecture. Furthermore, a hotel is usually comprised of multiple stories. Therefore, a project site improved with a hotel would not appear as "over-built" as it would with an industrial building that has a similar floor area. Per Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, hotels and motels are permitted (or conditionally permitted) in six (6) development districts in the City: Mixed Use (MU), Office Professional (OP), General Commercial (GC), Regional Related Commercial (RRC), Commercial Office (CO), and Industrial Park (IP). The FAR varies among these development districts as shown below: Development District Maximum Floor Area Ratio Mixed Use (MU) no maximum Office Professional (OP) 40% - 100% General Commercial (GC) 25% - 35% Regional Related Commercial (RRC) no maximum Commercial Office (CO) (see note 2) Industrial Park (IP)1 40% - 60% 1: Per Table LU-17 of the General Plan,within the Haven Avenue Overlay District the maximum FAR is 1.0 2: The Commercial Office (CO) District FAR is not defined in the Development Code The majority of the hotels and motels in the City are in the Industrial Park (IP) District. In order to ensure that opportunities for the development of hotels and motels are maximized in the Industrial Park (IP) District, and make the floor area ratio requirements that apply to hotel and motel uses consistent with some of the other Development Districts, it is proposed that the General Plan and Development Code be amended so that hotels and motels will be subject to a maximum floor area ratio of 1.0 (100 percent) within the Industrial Park (IP) District. The section of the General Plan that will be amended is page LU-17 and will read as shown in Exhibit M. The section of the Code that will be amended is Table 17.36.040-1 and will read as shown in Exhibit O. These amendments will apply to hotels and motels only, and only within the Industrial Park (IP) District (Exhibit P). They will not change any of the technical standards (building setbacks, building height, parking requirements, landscape coverage, etc.), design standards (architecture, site design, etc.), allowable land uses, and/or performance standards (noise, odors, hazardous materials, etc.) that currently apply within the subject District. The performance standards that apply to the Industrial Park (IP) District are the most restrictive of the performance standards that apply to the Industrial Districts. Although these amendments are associated with a site-specific project, the adoption of these amendments does not preclude the review by the City of any future hotel or motel located on P89 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879, AND DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 5 other parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) District, and the analysis of the environmental impacts as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). When the applications for future projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) caused by future projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. G. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, air quality (including greenhouse gases) and hydrology/water quality, geology and soils, cultural resources and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. The final determination of the environmental assessment for the project will be made by the City Council in conjunction with their review of the related General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment applications. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. Respectfully s bmitted, Candyce Burnett Planning Director CB:MS/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Floor Plans and Roof Plan Exhibit E - Building Elevations and Sections Exhibit F - Photometric Plan Exhibit G - Landscape Plan Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Comments (November 18, 2014) Exhibit I - Design Review Committee Action Comments (December 16, 2014) Exhibit J - Section 17.126.020 — Universal Definitions (excerpt) and Figure 17.126.020-6 Floor Area Ratio Exhibit K - Table 17.30.030-1 — Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District (excerpt) Exhibit L - Page LU-17 of the General Plan Exhibit M - Page LU-17 of the General Plan with Amended Text Exhibit N - Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code P9O PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879, AND DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 6 Exhibit 0 - Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code with Amendments Exhibit P - Parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) District Exhibit Q - Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study Parts I, II, and Ill Draft Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2014-00232 P91 i sr V.. - .SAI.A E AVE ' r't ���"�'Z� 3°c ..a'A. = :A ° .....c RANCHO } *s n .� �,�a.;° r O .•ic.. + cr )A4i.SS,A.`.ate -.�M.i .., a°s•a w. CUCAMONGA °f 4r'w'•'v' a / .'�A?,fir..e u "`�r w... Z r I rANE-r'S Si 5 , ST n� p-�rry'��' S Z- .' !p„ +' a. ` N ••LiROr rem E uuv �j M?AWROWS ' :DS SC4L5 S' 5T s EC rIW.qa, ,,r e rF r.� + --4rr*r 4 ©y rc.�. c ra+^'wn x fLLJ1Y H[♦DKjry i Na.. sra cr °..gcroma rAA 1{ �,. s RNErNSSrDa Y tu ,AwR°AS� ,M.E S, lows so w^r novEf- r �cEa'49 "s. f 5. 1� - _ - •• r 1 -w r mix w I`.a Fn�a. . . _ e W VICTORIA ' r NulEyyr. n� s 04,0 {,N"sa .a EAmErFOOr I•sc 'S ."�,I} TS °<a.E r A I i "r"'° cErvrcEn - ri W NonEror.s, - .aor C D'FN'x'.I,P; '#W�t GENDNA� } - °I..-•'s ,�..r.�F A. '+vo4 v U,+wr-L:1!,.... ca..r ` c a ETJWAHI a� O © M arr . . JESSE C, le< c i S 1 t0 1 ur-1 . .r r d°' 1 ! t LWI s +.` l r '{ c e L ••,—,:a s T, .,," 77- a,,,� SADD4EAA,,E a } W UVIM S, :rm ii G- 1 1 ag} '"r.;q 1 . W t} 'r w t rrs• :+ 'fir°,: 'i. / i 1 t".;:,-;."W-s ! Ir. G y e 6R J. J3 u'Is uANMO LA sAe•.Les 3 �'I:ca' wmn PWUr,R e € fA¢�ciA - d � G <%mNRt�e :+.�a 'a•ow.r S RR ... .ww�E0° i x r <unw,N1m e e w �.'� s.a u.w •sr«sawa c E s3 P.nr.F°„r FJL1A MiINMM �, b 4. �, € [�yF ✓<c e u y�IIF.a'RL DA 9•�- LLL Joann ' A4 r a r" RAtiCHCiCIJCA\tOVGA wa a } - - �- •. Y $wr.r. *AA I e.nAnx3 r Ss. y iA°�e, 11MPECAN a �°^ CENTRAL PAR} ; e _ • _t : - n..>. SI.9 I • ° '54 G c .F.�` S' 3 Y 3 Fire > Y 15. t aR • , war ,....nn _ %% I a r 4r i k; A ,...,,,w' Station 3 m sNnroc- '''4 le[M- mNwn s'. i BASE �. � J .,--. RD,rr�•_ �'yEpul# s /roar. E d nwt� •.tr- ... t/12:71)-5R: sT T DSYM Homo g. n epee.�N .. ' r J t••-, ;cc-- = el..", • S .71 .»��. -. asEw.raoP W .r 3 1M10tb4/ .u1. $ MUP,¢ r C le c_c. 'wNp , Mdtti reran' WINEMUSEUM9,A'°�'C C awes n+t a_E1 C, 1 . a+"uer : X:'a 4' I $c c � 7C e - i i SpluLLrtIXf,Rt�i U 7 d`s i I, i S' M..cW a iv 7 4 c li+ c T. ¢`• WOW ST -r 'PDNW9W S' rAPSIYD70AR G «.�" a Aro5A1G DR [irG.ArED ._ n wa^ er, i M1LW.4R W - w..o. E ,aaaR ' "r eWw A a`gip a r� r y 5 RA. 9p's Y,*.�2eKU SCDNTDERIAa R y.YMAVa n v A ___,i,v► `A cider CI "' at'-;;,pp < .Fi r rr+• ;,� n .IXMWP7R a 'Do 'A ht".1 WWan i m ^ ,k/s,.. ? e a MODE mAA DCt o r IQpA1M{OA t° '9 ''•tq�ea ""'YI' .p wv�M,vs NEwENGlAN00P ADrM a!!' �,� W.�,ml,wn dpr ,,,/, �r :404,04..41.100.1".*�lr.:. oax,,:w. �TE A if.M. 'WM OR RID WAY anyA Dave.PA' ` 3 �+? �` I TERRA a►/�,� 'RAC Kr...4-,` f• d VISTA a +a.n,u ("BPoIXEwpOD OP e 7@r v ' °�+ E G (. 4 A RtaA b.• .. uA ,. eM DA LAS M,.'^"'�.5P.11941.10000.0.121 &M6MGw.. 'wm'Ew°°v• °v"•rE- , a'l u �+�.` a2 .� k V�Ew 9 n'•. -r WAC.w ';,WC C Ag+:E.r,?,., g 3 g r., ' / �� MdEAEgon enSaw® u ▪icam 'r+rw. ' R •- .i,rT� G 4+ilt,e ,�$•� 1 *;.a p �lh r f W..»w .. p1 s^"°% m Ea . 'lb,- 1! '�u4PPDSIO g Sr 4 I RUTH C rIR"VP- - i 1 II ££ I.q,r DMWG,DNR , WYpar r- - a 15 +0 1 wruEC ° it..., MUSSER . bae°' ,N cWM'"'o ,'£ �.cAsTER vi s'+i"' } , ausaE IX i. [ Jl CHURCH ST —till I -,r W-..G .. {ad ...�rr�� WOVE.WV ■■ ff¢¢ //'/ ;II - - • $PR ) C 5∎41 T]�q's ND PIOGE PD 4 - _ COMM CRIB OR e I \ i Y C •f _ MCI l Od'iy Avs e +en �_ t 4. .. " ewncAST VICTORIA GARDENS • . - p vwr td4i / e 4,' Jfr. A-0 ,° cZPE 5., i:g NORTH OWN / G g� Q7'> - iANW4 r�Na M.c.a. JQ � �'bi S ra.an€ = cuNwws "APEI © h A' - PARR. S4 �9 `� S 3 ' Ea+�w,o i a a m „...5 4• .)C • .. hASAILLES ST % , CREWL S, WaCM#2220 1 I Y TERRA VISTA -- - RANCHOi P ` �r "� ".. e TOWN CENTER - O SAN ANTONIO R '•'°R a E' r --- - - MEDICAL s CENTER I I COURT �rFF vNE Sr HOUSE i UUPE4 ST 09/4".4167'., g ' cwoss,C. aassn; CNES aN A CITY _ .© f SEBASTIAN WAY 1 vf AVF ?, HALL - 4-LL".J Cr FOOT5U ARETetACA M rPOLICE HERT AGE, ' rPr a. i 9 cal :,C/STATEON HOSPITAL ; n _ _-- y"+EE IX RAN(;HO CUCAMON4A OR- - • ADULISP(3*CS COMPL .a"_R.I, PROJECT SITE -----111 :: A0a •UJ PULLMAN CT EDISON CT > c CACOMAOR r I a Z >Puiroxcr adr BELL W a ° G ° Z r > W . - yD ., . I g _ - 0 .IEfiSEYBLYD , - :, r.� .. -. AVE Ors `■i •UAW',4 I ,��—._ , , Metrolnk -.- ---- '� r METROLINK TRAIN • Station _ I i ST J— j n ,NEWPORT OP MI MI it 1 I,u°aa ST `r. EMPIRE / LAKES GOLF COURSIT I } s, 6TH ST. . ___A .. _ _ ._—___ EL 15 sow/poop w le a 1 �. li a S / s %vS .MISSWIPAIK • I < Z i ''sESt W usso,S'DA aj' I 1•- 8 •wrs.Nw me <cI II W 4 G Z P4 4TH ST ,_. — — a--__—L — 4TH ST �7 r ONTARIO /3.C. ii d /S MILLS / SHOPPING EXHIBIT A CENTER __- l General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 P92 Development Review DRC2014-00232 .0 . . - 7,1 i e pririn rr".-;''•-•4-' IT'.1 fi 70 . t C a • li . 1 . ' 71 • -• JIM Orli . 0 ... 3 +.... • • L . .-..• - el .II, frorrit • ,.„, „,,„ . , ..4 • AA - toe '"Itil i laMe'llralit ir - _______ 11., 11 i Li; • r , - ' ?,-.;• i , •-• - .. Oar_ 7- -1 .\ . • " 2•11,0 . 1 ” •••••ims is. • a • T I "I'f 1 •• --• 1.4. r I. - ....'1 . ' Mani a -14' .. ) - . '•- : ,4 • 14 a. ■ 1 -.......'...... ......--,.....-............... I 1 1 . •• Z a. .... . a k : 1 ...., , = 4 6.1 0 db. et Li I;qPi;IFIROlf th 0, ■ 0 7 I ... .... Frrirrn--r-orwrit; r--..aroa _.... . ... ;. .• .. • - - ,:t .49 '1 4. . Coll .4 • . . . i... . ." . r•-•X' .0.1114'. • a a w . • •••• 1 IS - .- - - . ..,.. . ■ ' 1 I A 11 t-..: . ......- ......... ..,\ .. ,.., • M. . , CO (1) . . i ....m. . . a . . • • • . • . ..., I I ... \\.. _ r ..........................u, _ . if:;.. f .1-7:411.i.'apply 1 . ; .. ..... , _ , PROJECT 'I at ., _,_\,.. - OM .11.1.6 1 r•- a Mie:'• • Ali : :_- . _ , , ' ,til H MISSIONVISTADRIVE i I ... 1 , ‘;.t 4... lipi ma air; - . _ . i i.,, .„„... 1 ' • - - - -IIIIIIF"'- =.- - ..... '1 . •1 - 4 .I . 11 -. • .... _r Riff!ITTTI wrii gip '44 7 an I . . , ,..- •i I 4 1 1$ i I .. _ . . ■.% * 4 • I a i . . ..-..., . - li- • 111 ....HI: 4 It. j • .„._, . . 111‘ , . ••••• i•11-11-a ■ . . i abi .,. 1 r' .; ti • . „. ii . . big 4 ' ---- ir- . •. I . . • ._ . — • - • i 7+1,... - :;,.. • . --1 '...1 . • ... . ____ ...2 ..4 -. = r-,--, 11". ...• r -i i . , Ili co.... -:.1-L.-- _ ... -OP $ - r 1 • -- 1.: A .-. , • • _ .„...iiijaoupileilizion, .....r. ....,_ _ . .. . . ..,„ :.-.-__ .:_-_-_-_ ___ = t . _ 1 ,, __. _ ......_ _ a ...... . „.„,.1r*. 04,„„s: _4.... ...... •-•4- - l I lir ift trillium, : , • • ,...„ _,, „,„,,I, . _ . di! ...A_ 6 ,,,,... 1 dit ir. , • . . . ' •44 . .- ....,„ _.., ,.• e1C %-"" _- . .... 4 4rw'r ' 1 I • 1•4•4 - arigh. PC Y-'. g--is5- 1 . •r..1....a APIIII li,.41"1"k t 4 ' .. 11 lif Illiiiiiel _ , !' V EXHIBIT B ,..g , ii t ii,NsrA.,,h--1--1 . . a,„,. 11, 11-1 • ... wWamrcnmmw ZfZC0il0iOU0'U38Wf1N35V0 P93 P.04101.077101 01 MMLYNJM viii WV tow laid IINVI NW 3W IOCFP,IiKI WOW On 0110110/013 M 1101.001010 0001313 WV O YO LI M4n(WO l v.,vow OIFtlWV wWgd W AaVJ O 0 SWOON 9308 fLO4 6111.11101:01 3 00111.OW 0X0]3010 OM 1.1.17011.190.13000001.1.17011.190.1.1.17011.190.1300000:01A WNW) 1 0a Xid d www w 0108 Y3 1000,60010 0 010100 0 WOW vmonw161 r,vao almee wry Lm OSOwe W/00 15W lelf1101114 mumvo u muLV3n° ' m0uii NOIS30 aNY ONIljVUa NVOVIYI 11313u 1310H WOOL S01 AU01S Mf104 M3N %3ONI '1^16 yp 110ILLYW S3Lf150NV NN10131AUNL 0 gg 3 * Imcg orOnwa 0/ 41 ii 11 ore hZga S - 1y 33 - I • @ l I a 5 Q=Q�s1 1. l I _ — a � J //J J I I� gm8 ::.#4..i:/-"6Z06\.�� 1.�¢ I.rOrlD�it01Y��.�Oi —L� pp� ill! �- r' P i' - ''1 -_ - — _+.Ld3R r '° zgS`o oW� R S .,..•••• o� �. s:/ S Eqi = x' ,°v k `55 A @JE I °r < P'm g,'�o a I I. O. i!F..' "airs,. f 4 x 1 O B Mil it F 219 i u'B \ y @@@} Z %l d n n1F' a C 3 6 I .°.' O i ne -� P i �;6 3 1—O • L , I:. e s I 7;°11"'' IyF ' }rt if 4 --i .�E : I' I:9 a a t�.;gll ' `I I. ��� L+*• ij, }pip .0, 1 k•4$E 1t it"�L.6 t1'lI L.a i4 t ', �'� 3 ' -' F.litvy'l.l . 'a 2.:at � .6 1-_R ,+a`s`s ik, w' 'el• ..!Gm !sa. 13 w• hp .. . 1 3M• ", .a 1-- 1 a • B•(I.= s, •C , A• ` `F'- 141 i ' ey i °a $;• 1I— .v 1 {wE a� "�r #� '; R. l " z4. H S 333C 11 :. _ $ a t: d L , ' w di ^AN 1 h 1 @ ea 1 iwo ill P. QQi� - W E W 3 (.--) 1 ; 11 6 :41=15:1:: afi p 33 g3 p r yy py ; TI 33 Y 1 1S U �[ i r I, I° Y1� I. W w Lit f J ° W R 3 2 C r W J % 7 _ N mil- I° in. 1� yrrcro a _�������� o _ 0 xAiw vs•n-1- c9 1 ° I" _ _ w g.C MI I N --f y 3 EXHIBIT C ` m 1 j .,-- gli r l r LOZORf10ZON0 N3SwON 35V3 "°w ."°f' P94 «�� P PCOVYI7MV3tlV SOMA UXY,MJ3!/,rl MI.i,V1641 '310tl tv MUM VD Srallars0 u ' ,. .., . ..a SOWS 9700/31fIlLIMM SPIVS NOMA CROW.01V MOM CV Q a ,VD VOOIIV3nO ao•x NV 1tl 3N INcannon,gm Male OW,M ON uen 011GWJ O.axaurA713s111reuv,u NSW/ IV 1310HwOON SO 1 AHONS LflOd M3N N9I530 ONY ONIlYLO ANNJV 3 �,� %3ON� uw LLOINWVI 831111S OW NNI 0l313tlltli • 41 1 is t.® � I ®1 'I Ii I I. II I II .p t t. •Ilei I I• IIIIIII 1 I � lo Iyo ll'lt �I�I l dI C� 1it- wI' I ■ � _ I ,.. l ll 6i ',Il l l !.I • - qq E I II IIhll®pI „ ',I [Ill I alii\- l �,�. I ,j ' I I°°Lis" UIlqj a Ilf I i---,10,-.. j � I.-.32±.11..I i ® Ea i®I 1 ; U ',I !I 1s tlt d-1..- �-, I4 ir 1:1 I IA ��■':al It !1! 1143 1 2i .1 scene' 3- 'i- • Pc /- SI- a EXHIBIT D ZCZ00140ZOLIO a313WON 3SYO mun w p95 rifle Pe el wunmmv nay wOUONYirme nu zi un- pots SMOLLO1SONVICLLYST-3 SW Mitt(MO,.,a a °'^ mow nee' sn nlauu.. }r.n.,.M>sa.00R. , e Q 0 Ia1 M'NYAIU=MO LW RiIL VJ VONOITCCO MYMI CAW.Rrmm n. srvuoawnww.um Raxu.e ru1a. MS/MS/LW Baum.a0t NOIS3O OW ONLLAYLIO ANYJYIW On mau.1vin 3uvmanua.0 3z�°iu i-i 131ON WO0M MI AUOJS 201Od M3N :X3ON1 rNK uw 11.012121YrI sauna ONY NNI O131581Y3 • ^ �NMI .— n. n _e ' ....0 jam 11111 11 e A 1 ; �� 11 1 I1 A 1 mail IS 11 1 Is II A ' I1I � AI �I -,<,I AI ! A I 1 Art It 1 s 19:16 I��'11. :J I III I 1 d r I!. I w�° 1 AI�U I VIII I! 1 II�IIII,II 1A IL. ` 111011•1•1 III Ii.ff. o I� i A "1_ IS f M I I I • 1 i .1 � !� sII a I i{�� �� f iq a I� i�a- z �I ' i�1�1I , �iII,C7��(,I II I 1 i� ' i 1 !9' ! IW N! 1 @I 6 �j A ~pI I� �! AIII 1"1 1. 1 III ! i�.I !1r: 1 - a 1i a- ? Iii! 1 1 1 • AI 11 I ro; III I_ 491.11. . A Ir / ar S Nit ra �r 5,1111111111 �...��� i ella Y ZSZO01i0ZONO:1:13SWON 3SVO NW NOIYIII tY - , P96 NVld Ixninlutt vim OO1O S S 314V1 311U 0v (Wlal.lwl POW M01333 MY3WJtlw:\3V 9% WM'IJmO EMI MILL.IRSI.1OS SCOWO0014Rums„ bAT]II9[IWI W3tll3Y fOp1 VXKO1f,LLtl1 os W gY3a.,p tl]41fima000u MO33B 0 M41NW[W 39MSW tl31YM ,IWVMAtlO N 041E.0 YJMM JpI.MW QAtl Y1MIVIN3 ISM AW1iI NMMM IMP MYm1 NY WW19Bl1Y %iMAY Ott We 9NCO.W3133Ws:lan x5/101V/1/31J9 I. NOIS3O ONV ONLLIYNO ANVOVIW i33Ne 31.1.11 V/ NIgt2 1310H SOON SOL AiW1S 21110i M3N X3ONI yw 1.LOIUNVW S3Lf13 ONY NNI Ol31dNIVi • �9�p 1 EI'T 1 _ _ + I I��� E � n E i. 'I r. 9 aF'.r-r I ' I �Rp 6 i 1 i Ann iii-igimiglirt... 3 , i i II . y ,.� 1'E "m0'i pllgw - ' ri'a' FL Iq rtiir4 u is m 1f 4::.11L111111111:111111'111111111111,10111111.1111111110114 IMM1111111.111 5 I- i *hi:- w.w.w,ww:w.ww Ll�muuww:wuwwl — of lir, i Ss- ma dux, _ I �-_ �I �t 5.m, __ r I p�1 S N O _3 >zr y ti! 19P� 1 .� 4 siGF.. 3q 1 I lel I, ! 1 I ,il_ i, yS i-11�� li4ml 1 a ..,., _' Ids , I ; • i� -- dN.. ." zczoo-r�oz3n0�a3ewnN 3svO P97 wend wn vn,.-0♦300 wn,.w"".w 3TIV1Th A I Cm zn,(Coo piomd n n COL 30 In 3 °I:. .303 3"' Omar.��: .nu« a.�en. �wu.e Q I1 N015300NV ONLLAVH0 ANVOMIN 'lv "A"3 u374i3111 'i 1310H NOON GM.AUO1S MOOT M3N X30NI °° ,mow flOItlWIN Satins ONV NNI 01313NIVi II 1 1 I I _ I ! I I C - - ! �, , i to , e., I -. 01111 II1111IIIII1111I1I — IF 1 1 :I -L —1 I a 111 I IIIIIII ' , i ; _: hi 1 - - ��-I -I �l 1-------Nii I I' IIIII - - - , - 1 - -I -I -I rail I I Ij °IIII — 1 1 1 .111111 I ; � � fi. 1 I 111II • I3 I '. I I , I 1 � az CI' zi mu I II UIIIIIII' r. „. , ..:4, p - :11 111 1I, a j 'Llli _- flfl -I -1 -I I= , � I IIuIiiuI-uuI I1 _ . II 1 11'. 1 1111 MI �F .II ;:.H I _. �I L 110 I r I� a , u I! I ' nm P E.. i, 1 11 ,I I III 1 1 l' rni MI I I I III IIIEl _I .IEll i I 1 111111 - ,, Zti I; - -I MI MI I HA 1 1, 11111 -- - -- - L'I Eli El 'Ell ;> . ' 1 1 1 1 13111tH a'7 - r- iI r _ (C y- g -,c 1 EXHIBIT E r _---_---- -_ ZCiOO-PIGZONO N3EINON35V0 �� SP.v S1gLLY�3 av NILeC SOLN,3] h,3.Jw �VUW dWM ur ,� Q wwru,,.rnma cm twuvna30i —+rotif,m1i *a ,i .�,.uv au,n vwamxn1nwvuie nawm eor NOIS30 ONV ONILiVtiO ANV9VIW nry 1310H NOON SOl AVO1S tlO0d M3N 11,10 X3ONI 110INNVN 53Lf15 ONV NNI O13UNIV4 U -,a ,�,—I— r r� �� 1111I11111111II1111IIHI 'y 11. ± g§. $ III rri lE 11 �� I IPII IIIII 's- 'Tli 11 . ��I� :I -1 1 i9 II �I '1 _,.� i i I HMI � �� �__i im a ix all I III UM ' i I � allinIi I I I IIIII , j,_li�iti IIC�n Q i t IA .I .I I 1 ! � I I r I®� ;EU, H ' a 5I I s 9 _ I II I II � ::. I,�_ .1 I 1 I I�•I'ItIk11111I . I .I, .f' .I'� I ' Ik ,, d /11 1 I Iii} Ay;� 9¢g ' I ' j1 4i . 1 _ I 1 I IIIII ; ° iii- 3 2 3 ._ Hk LI _ II�II.1'�1 001 _ �r� -_ I! .i .I =,-1 -±.---1_ i; _ , �i I 111111 II ri a 4i is . .1 .1 ni In '•y -- II I II I I Y ii 1 1 I I I I . ZS200tIOC3SO:a3SWf1N 3SVO WY re I P99 M0113791YMN!W1,OW Wild l M13M31V DX t-np & 31C4Y 133801ry 9S011Y/313 W OW Y3 scorn 38 OH 9MGtY8313 W ITICar0 CLOP SS V E KL�4.PDJ.1.3n OOYVb SOON OOMOOV'mono. W OM AIMING.38nr000'. P(3W.O Q rvlL13O wwow ow morn W P v.)WN oO?m ;end won avow,av aid mvacYv LW 0114114 70010 V211131911/3 91.9• nvuo 0+1OW Mai VOW.' WY sNOLWAT3 AMODIO WSJ .i 1310N1100aSOt AWLS NOW MIN N01S300NV 0NLLiVa0 ANV0VW 33W Wn w 110IaaVri Satins ONV NNI 43131ialVi %3ONI lava E . 9r i 1 E w L ;� e ' i !I ;*7 c v e$ 'l woz Ie1 i 3I e i ! 1 a ,1- a 11 5i1 ibo�OH; i F �E::i�18i s r - ' 9l$3 5 Ii_ ..� 1 � :: t :,. ../ � � �f t 1� �G r9 x 2 LL ;-Iii, 51 L rr_ J Filw <UyZ� y o -it1l Y i A f I. IBmv ':t I ViO3-1. 2 j22 M ie v yp - d intro limns '1 Wi ii 1 �afuN ill f of 4 2 { 1 ifL ht! 6: !'iai i! + 7777: tl.ci.- -- @ .1 111 it z i 1 A i unwuno I E _ = p I e3 [ p v i yy3y i q _ - - i Ii E i e1. Si i :7 1 A 71 ' v , - iE B A M 8� ' tl 8Y ill : 3 ; : :: i iii @ ! ill iii gnat masa% qq 2 I _` e_ 1 d" i s 1s 1 ',Cr � � I L1 t ,. . I ' 1I-c c I-,°P -- • i -M wX 1 8e ys y1 ,j , 4 ttII I 1 I. -- aY •�f I -r ,ilt?li I.-q _ a'av3g,1 11... lK I h_' I `;i galy�3. 5-"I ti 1 3 ' a: ',• , j —--— a•' 1 j jo- 1 _p i 1 lit ,...- w PC yl �`/'S alo$ - 1 it EXHIBIT F . I EPftld.totranun rev ' ZEZOO-KOZOLICI.21381111N ggra r ono oncoosawo tv P100 toctonnoreo nye wow aw.one c'cn ins co' VOu039 ovetstavviv 9v LOCIVIVICOO :3901.1 NOLL330 CINVSPCSOM312 9V Infal V9 VOINte, 119111,10 IMO ItIbVI SVILI alCal ON tIOVIVIVSnOf IV ld 43107110 UM SS3V09/ C9 9X01193 UV/WA sone 110014 011.110WON0039 92 OM unman.eocnakocee t131W0 ......... 0 1/9. Win VCOIS 0.11093 EV WV."V29019010 011201•11 OV011 VINVIVY39.1 Ionia awnve woolen°mond Waal InVMOINVILIld 92311379110n rilk. N0IS30 ONV 011111V110 ANYOY111 cri Mn.3na 4 1.33111 Atil ri 73.10H V10021 SO I.,k80.1.9 81109 A.A3/1 pm,/ 110111UVW S31111S atm NM 01319lin9 nom Ilya 3 i 1 1 1 g gi 8 I al! 9 i g II' 1 14 a:: 5' iii/ 1 A g a - gi ni 4 ,0 y'■ gi 1 ag: ; g i g • gi rig :g 2 ;42 kdkil l'3i6i g i. ig Ig g 143; g; I 50011 hid I in! gg ! i AIS 1 ;:i! "!2 g ri i ! g 64:8" gA iligi .-g. gal ,-, Ig; ;1 2 le! .e ! 1 g le 2541 8 3111111111 • - : igti ig g i mil, 5 11.5.P gg '17 4 5":g 4 14 igg g i g 1 g dig 11 I 1:i.,: y le =. .! e 1 :131 3: 2 15= 5 i i.; ! II% 3 IMP ! ' i! .;;;;' ix ! ;0 , i!15 ; ii9 1, 1; ; .;!!;4 i; i i! i $9 $95 N ::a 1 a 1 00 ;1 q .5 ....4. . - ig !f31 5 g ii gbh' I 261 11/ gI : ' !;:14. 6; k kg k '3,1 ift ,.‘,3 Ag A 1 d d AIM Li :III I ig /' g iggi •-.4 ig; .7.4 A tgA ' ggAh gg i ; WI 1 - !; !Ai !I :5, 0 •40 S (:::) Cb 1 IL X ' hail 0 2 ; 1111 . " ! gli I AP g li cg AM 1. .3 i I A 41111. 5 , ....%...a..flaymolianamseigarilre.. • al; •1"2 a. ---- 1 i il i :k I . 2 , n. 1 1. V g a ° 9:rer ig! Id a;t ;,,• I i 3 . O. • 0 1 _ wg to .1 ...• • 1 %.-5. 2,"36 0 ' 1 W0it ' sa© I 119 _ '' io. 1 poi,..._, 1 I i hid c • rq ii Rg0 .... 1 i • r 1 •.:•2:41* • , 4,, =E _........-. . 1.! , __.... i 1; !).4 I ragY 1-7 ; Litie II k g .a : .job ■ I) A. L__.. 1-- lb: . At :5., 11 1 i . 11 n, IMIE b ,. ... / : - -I-.-- - -__ tgan't.t? / , s t , 8 i t'aLl. 21, • • ..„.. i apt 1 , 0:mow • g 21 __ g ., • : 4 4 ; ."----- ',PE! K 11 • . ., • • c't ... gm ! / k . io A I 9 ; / p 1 I c g N a gg i.k ,— -.I ; i\I . No ...-i.. !a-, --,.....„ 0 cep get ___...4. . • i/EI g ; / ' . a a...00....ye , , j Ism _ 1 1 .- ( A 0 a k 1 / LL cif ( St E hY I P i t I 0 .0 f C EXHIBIT G P101 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith November 18, 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 — WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. - A proposal to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet with 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) within the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street; APN: 0229-341-11. Related file: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879. Desiqn Parameters: The project site is a parcel with an approximate area 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres): The parcel is approximately 289 feet(east-west) by approximately 308 feet (north to south). The parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses/shrubs. The project site is bound on the north by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station. To south and west are hotels (Towne Place Suites by Marriot and Holiday Inn Express). To the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue, is an industrial office building and another hotel (Homewood Suites by Hilton). The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding it is Industrial Park (IP) District. The property and the properties to the east, west, and south are also within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of approximately 1,050 feet and 1,046 feet, respectively. The applicant proposes to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms. The hotel will operate as a Fairfield Inn and Suites by Marriot. The building will have a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 67 percent. As the FAR of the proposed hotel exceeds the maximum FAR of 60 percent that is permitted in the Industrial Park(IP) District per Figure LU-2 of the General Plan and Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code, the applicant has submitted applications to amend both the General Plan and Development Code (Related files: DRC2014-00877 and DRC2014-00879, respectively) in order to establish a maximum FAR that will be higher than 50 percent and is specific to hotels and motels. The actual FAR that will apply to hotels and motels has not been established as the analysis is ongoing. The entrance and main lobby area will be located at the east side of the building. There will be two points of access — one via an existing driveway that is shared with the property to the north and another driveway that will be constructed at the southeast corner of the property. The parking field will be located on the east and west sides of the project site. The required parking for hotel uses is 107 parking stalls; 108 parking stalls will be provided. The distribution of landscaping will be generally 'equal' throughout the project site. Generous ground cover and trees will be provided along the street frontage at Pittsburgh Avenue, in the area in front of the main entrance, and along all sides of the building. Additional landscaping will be provided along the north, east, and west property lines. Landscape coverage is 16.6 percent; the minimum requirement is 15 percent for this development district. Consistent with other hotels, there will be a recreational area including a pool at the west side of the building. Although there is a wall along the north property line, no new walls are proposed along the south or west property lines. The basic footprint of the hotel will be approximately 15,000 square feet in area. The hotels to the south and west have footprints of approximately 18,000 square feet in area while the hotel to the east has a footprint of approximately 25,000 square feet in area. As noted previously,the proposed hotel will have four(4)floors. The hotel to the west has three(3) floors while the hotels to the south and east have four (4) floors. Thus, the size and massing of the proposed hotel will be similar to that of the existing hotels. The architecture will be relatively unique for this location and the City overall. Unlike the surrounding $_ySe. hotels that were approved and constructed within the last 10 years that have elements incorporated into their design that were derived from classic architectural themes, the architecture of the EXHIBIT H P102 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. November 18, 2014 Page 2 proposed hotel will be more contemporary. As part of an ongoing process of providing high quality design that is interesting, and in order to be current with evolving market requirements and aesthetic tastes, within the last few years the City has approved different commercial and institutional projects that incorporate architectural themes that depart from the dominant themes (inspired by Spanish, Italian, and Craftsman architecture) of existing development in the City. Similarly, it has become common practice to allow tenants/occupants of a building to have signature architecture that reflects their 'brand'. The architecture of the proposed hotel is consistent with these goals. The footprint of the hotel has significant horizontal movement and, as a result, the planes of the exterior walls are significantly articulated. This gives the impression that the hotel is constructed of multiple"blocks" in contrast to a single block and reduces the horizontal and vertical visual mass of the building. Reinforcing this impression will be various finishes including stucco, stackstone veneer, cement board siding. Furthermore, the colors- beige, white, and dark gray-will be varied for each block. Glazing will be the principal element at the main entrance. Although the roofline is flat, vertical articulation will be incorporated by undulating the parapet. At the main entrance there will be a curved, metal canopy that, in addition to establishing the location of the entrance, will provide weather protection and shade. The canopy will be supported by a single, over-sized pillar finished with a stackstone veneer. At the top of the parapet at the same general location as the main entrance there will be another metal (decorative) canopy. Each block will have prominent score lines accented with a contrasting color. Distinguishing details include the alternating color scheme at the blocks located at the northeast and southwest corners of the building and the dark gray stucco finish at the horizontal midpoint of the hotel's east and west elevations and along the first floor. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Staff supports the contemporary design. There are no Major Issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. There are no Secondary Issues. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone to match the building. 2. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on- center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. P103 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. November 18, 2014 Page 3 3. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 5. All walls, including retaining walls, exposed to public view shall be constructed of decorative masonry blocks, i.e. slump stone, split-face, or have a decorative finish such as stucco. 6. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right- of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. 7. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 8. Consistent with the other hotels in the vicinity, the trash enclosure shall be constructed according to the design standard that applies to commercial projects which requires, at a minimum, a roll-up door and an overhead structure, and a decorative finish such as stucco or decorative veneer such as stackstone to match the building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission and forward it to the Planning Commission for review and action. Staff notes to the Committee that the project will be forwarded to the Planning Commission with the • General Plan and Development Code Amendments. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the proposed project and generally accepted the proposal as submitted. However, they had two (2) items that needed to be addressed before they would make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The first item that the Committee wanted addressed was the proposed color (white) of the stucco-finished wall plane around and above the main entrance of the hotel (on the east elevation). They requested that the applicant change the color of this wall plane to a shade of gray. The second item was the porcelain tile proposed at the wall plane immediately adjacent and to the north of the wall plane at the main entrance. The size,texture, and general appearance of the tile was not clear based on the plans that were submitted. The Committee requested a physical sample of this tile. The applicant was directed to provide a set of color elevations/renderings showing the revised stucco color and to provide a sample of the tile for review by the Committee at the next available • Design Review Committee meeting. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith • P1O4 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith December 16, 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 — WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. - A proposal to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet with 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street - APN: 0229-341-11. Related file: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879. Background: The proposed project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on November 18, 2014(Attachment A). The Committee generally accepted the proposal as submitted but had two (2) items that needed to be addressed before they would make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The first item that the Committee wanted addressed was the proposed color (white) of the stucco-finished wall plane around and above the main entrance of the hotel (on the east elevation). They requested that the applicant change the color of this wall plane to a shade of gray. The second item was the porcelain tile proposed at the wall plane immediately adjacent, and to the north, of the wall plane at the main entrance. The size, texture, and general appearance of the tile was not clear based on the plans that were submitted. The Committee requested a physical sample of this tile. The applicant was directed to provide a set of color elevations/renderings showing the revised stucco color and to provide a sample of the tile for review by the Committee at the next available Design Review Committee meeting. The applicant revised the color as requested (see attached 11-inch by 17-inch color elevations/renderings—Attachment B). Staff notes to the Committee that the applicant also revised the color of the corresponding wall plane on the west elevation of the building. The sample of the tile will be provided by the applicant at the meeting. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None. • Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. The policy issues discussed in the previous Design Review Committee report and at the Committee meeting held on November 18, 2015, shall apply. Pc y - S -4S EXHIBIT I P105 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. December 16, 2014 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Following the Committee's review of the requested color revision and sample tile, staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission and forward it to the Planning Commission for review and action. Staff notes to the Committee that the project will be forwarded to the Planning Commission with the General Plan and Development Code Amendments. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the revised color of the wall plane around and above the main entrance of the hotel. They also reviewed the sample tile provided by the applicant. They accepted the revision and tile sample as submitted. The Committee recommends that the Planning Commission approve the project. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith P106 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article VIII, Chapter 17.126 Floor Area, Gross. The sum of the gross horizontal areas of average floors of a building measured from the exterior face of exterior walls or from the centerline of a wall separating two buildings, but not including interior parking space, loading space for motor vehicles, or any space where the floor-to-ceiling height is less than six feet (6'). Floor Area Ratio. The ratio between gross floor area of the primary structure(s) on a site and gross site area. It includes all occupiable floors of a building, making it a three-dimensional unit of measure. For example, a multi-story building with a total floor area of one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet on a fifty thousand (50,000) square foot lot will have a floor area ratio(FAR) of 2.0. The following are examples of how a building with a total floor area of 100,000 square feet can be configured on a 50,000 square foot lot to achieve a FAR of 2.0. See Figure 17.126.020-6 (Floor Area Ratio). 17.126.020-6 FLOOR AREA RATIO .-`-..,,,,,,,,,,,„,. / / ''''\.. „ //‘ l 141411411441111 1 00% Lot Coverage: 50% Lot Coverage: 25% Lot Coverage: • 50,000 sf Floor Plate • 25,000 sf Floor Plate • 12,500 sf Floor Plate • 2 Stories • 4 Stories • 8 Stories Frontage. The side of a lot abutting a street, the front lot line, except the side of a corner lot. Front Lot Line. See Lot Line, Front. Front Wall. See Wall, Front. Garbage. Animal and vegetable waste resulting from the handling, storage, sale, preparation, cooking, and serving of foods. General Plan. The General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, including all maps, reports, and related plan elements adopted by the City Council. Glare. The effect produced by brightness sufficient to cause annoyance, discomfort, or loss in visual performance and visibility. Grade. • The lowest horizontal elevation of the finished surface of the ground, paving, or sidewalk at a point where height is to be measured. • The degree of rise or descent of a sloping surface. P y- Y ,s- 17.126-7 EXHIBIT J P107 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article Ill, Chapter 17.30 Land Use/Zoning J x x n a U 0 0 0 ° O o = District > -i 2 O Z 0 0 0 y 0 .O E x 0 LL M Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N C C C P P P P P P P N N N N N N Services Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N C C N C C C C C N C N N N N N N Bed and Breakfast C C C N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N N N N N Inn Building Materials N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Store and Yard Business Support N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Services Call Center N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing N N N N N N P N P P N N N N P N N N N N N N Business(7) Child Day Care N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Facility/Center Consignment Store N N N N N N C N C C N C N N N N N N N N N N Convenience Store N N N N N N P N P P N C N N C C N N N N N N Crematory Services N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N (7) Drive-In and Drive- ThroughSalesand N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Service(8) Equipment Sales and N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C P P N N N N Rental Feed and Tack Store N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Furniture, Furnishing, N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N and Appliance Store Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N P N P P N P P Nursery Grocery Store/ N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N N Supermarket Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N C N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P N P P P N P N C P N N N N N N Hotel and Motel N N N N N N P C N P N N C C P N N N N N N N nterne a e I Kennel, Commercial N N N N N N N N N C C N C N C C N N N N N N PL Y—o 'VC 17.30-7 EXHIBIT K P108 1. Victoria GardensNictoria Arbors 8. Industrial Area Specific Plan (Sub- Area 18) 2. Town Center(Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 9. Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 3. Terra Vista 10. Haven Avenue and Church Street 4. Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Site Avenue and Center Avenue 11. Western Gateway(Bear Gulch 5. Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Area) Avenue and Hellman Avenue 12. Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga 6. Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue Channel Site and Hampshire Street 13. Historic Alta Loma(Amethyst Site) 7. Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue Industrial Designations Industrial areas in Rancho Cucamonga benefit from their strategic location near the I- 15 and 1-10 freeways, the Metrolink station, and railway lines. A variety of light industrial, business park, office, manufacturing, heavy industrial, and similar business and industrial uses have been established, providing diverse employment opportunities for residents throughout the Inland Empire. Three Industrial designations are established that continue to provide many industrial development opportunities. Industrial Park(Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 0.60) The Industrial Park designation accommodates master-planned 109 concentrations of light industrial, research and development businesses, green technology, and general and medical office uses. The designation also allows for limited convenience goods �� '` and services for employees and visitors. Industrial Park uses are typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees per acre is higher than uses involving mostly manufacturing or warehousing. The Industrial Park designation applies to major -T traffic corridors in the City, including 4m Street, Haven Avenue, - _ • Arrow Highway, and Foothill Boulevard, near the largest of civic and commercial activity. Industrial Park General Industrial (Probable FAR of 0.50 and Maximum FAR of 0.60) The General Industrial designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesale supply, heavy commercial, green technology, and office uses. Where adjacent to residential uses, properties designated General Industrial should be designed for office uses, or site planning should incorporate buffering techniques to minimize noise and traffic impacts associated with the industrial activity. Heavy Industrial(Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 0.50) The Heavy Industrial designation permits heavy manufacturing, compounding, processing or fabrication, warehousing, storage, freight handling, and truck services and terminals, as well as supportive service commercial uses. Heavy Industrial areas 6 -,c nity Design,and Historic Resources EXHIBIT L , NGA GENERAL PLAN LU-17 P109 1. Victoria GardensNictoria Arbors 8. Industrial Area Specific Plan(Sub- Area 18) 2. Town Center(Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 9. Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 3. Terra Vista 10. Haven Avenue and Church Street 4. Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Site Avenue and Center Avenue 11. Western Gateway(Bear Gulch 5. Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Area) Avenue and Hellman Avenue 12. Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga 6. Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue Channel Site and Hampshire Street 13. Historic Alta Loma(Amethyst Site) 7. Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue Industrial Designations Industrial areas in Rancho Cucamonga benefit from their strategic location near the I- Revise to read as follows: 15 and 1-10 freeways, the Metrolink station, and railway lines. A variety of light "(Probable FAR of 0.40 industrial, business park, office, manufacturing, heavy industrial, and similar business and Maximum FAR of 0.60, and industrial uses have been established, providing diverse emp1. - opportunities for residents throughout the Inland Empire. Ti - - Industrial except Hotels/Motels - designations are established that continue to provide man - • strial development maximum FAR of 1.0)" opportunities. Industrial Park .... : e.•: :-_ - • !. The Industrial Park designation accommodates master-planned tos "'.. concentrations of light industrial, research and development I businesses, green technology, and general and medical office uses. The designation also allows for limited convenience goods ! '� �• 1 • and services for employees and visitors. Industrial Park uses are P typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees per acre is higher than uses involving mostly manufacturing or •e warehousing. The Industrial Park designation applies to major ' traffic corridors in the City, including 4in Street, Haven Avenue, '4 Arrow Highway, and Foothill Boulevard, near the largest concentrations of civic and commercial activity. Industrial Park General Industrial (Probable FAR of 0.50 and Maximum FAR of 0.60) The General Industrial designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesale supply, heavy commercial, green technology, and office uses. Where adjacent to residential uses, properties designated General Industrial should be designed for office uses, or site planning should incorporate buffering techniques to minimize noise and traffic impacts associated with the industrial activity. Heavy Industrial (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 0.50) The Heavy Industrial designation permits heavy manufacturing, compounding, processing or fabrication, warehousing, storage, freight handling, and truck services and terminals, as well as supportive service commercial uses. Heavy Industrial areas _�S nity Design,and Historic Resources EXHIBIT M ' NGA GENERAL PLAN LU-17 • P110 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.36 C. Industrial Site Development Standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in Article IV (Site Development Provisions) that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District IP GI MI/HI ' HI Lot Area (minimum)111 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 2 ac(2j 5 ac Lot Width (minimum)(3) 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Setback (minimum distance between structure and property line in feet)(4) Front Yard See Table 17.36.040-2 Side Yard 5ft(5) 5 ft(5) 5ft 15j 5ft(5) Street Side Yard (and rear yard abutting street) See Table 17.36.040-2 Rear Yard 0 ft 151 0 ft 151 0 ft(5) 0 ft(5) Distance Between Buildings • Primary Buildings Must meet current Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Building Height(maximum in feet) Prima Buildings 35 ft at the front setback161. Maximum height is ry g 75 feet in. Acc-s • :u'I•i • • f 18 ft 1: t 24 t Floor Area Ratio (maximum ratio of building to lot square footage) Floor Area Ratio 140-60% I 50-60% I n/a 40-50% •. •n e 'eq t -m-n l I • -r • 'a. - • a: 'ns•:ce • 'rp. c- o' •ro1- Open Space/Landscape Area 15% 10% 105%z)/ 10%(2)/5% Other Performance Standards (see Chapter 17.66) A B C/B (2) C Table Notes: (1) Condominium Lots.Condominium lots and lots within an approved Master Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area: 10%minimum landscape area;and the "8"level Performance Standards(Chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minim um required under the City's currently adopted Building Code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings exceeding 35 feet high shall be set back an additional 1 ft. from the front setback for each 1 ft.of height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. Pc y- r -iC 17.36-19 EXHIBIT N P111 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.36 • C. Industrial Site Development Standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in Article IV (Site Development Provisions) that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District IP GI MI/HI HI Lot Area (minimum))') 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 2 ac(2j 5 ac Lot Width (minimum)(31 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Setback (minimum distance between structure and property line in feet))4) Front Yard See Table 17.36.040-2 - Side Yard 5 ft(5) 5 ft(51 5 ft(5) 5 ft i51 Street Side Yard (and rear yard abutting street) See Table 17.36.040-2 Rear Yard 0 ft(5) Oft i51 0 ft(5) 0 ft(5) Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings • Must meet current Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Building Height(maximum in feet) Primary Buildings 35 ft at the front setback(6). Maximum height is Add "(8)" 75 feet(7). Accessory Buildings 14 ft 18 ft 18 f 24 ft Floor Area Ratio(maximum ratio of building to lot square footagel....--- Floor Area Ratio 40-60%(t) 4-60% n/a 40-50% Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) 10%12)/ Open Space/Landscape Area 15% 10% 5 10%12)/5% 10%12)/5% Other Performance Standards(see Chapter 17.66) A B C/B(2) C Table Notes: (1) Condominium Lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved Master Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area; 10%minimum landscape area;and the "B"level Performance Standards(Chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minim um required under the City's currently adopted Building Code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings exceeding 35 feet high shall be set back an additional 1 ft. from the front setback for each 1 ft. of height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. > Add Table Note #8 here (see below) \ D. Other Mi scellaneous Industrial Development Standards. (8) For Hotels and Motels, the maximum floor area ratio is 1.0 (100 percent) PC L/-$ -, 17.36-19 EXHIBIT 0 I P112 s any Ja;sa43o1:I -.ACV Tar- ' .L Od via 11,Mit N any ualmm C /pill ' I „:„ v,41 .. 2.1 cr, ..., a m ....... L. co *71 L a a ...._ ., . . , ,_ ,., _ _ .... • __ it, . f.. ,I lo Nov .- -7----) any uaneH _ N --1 any esOULaH N3 m s 3 ,I m zei u. Q a4 any PIe4!43sy lime en 0 ..•'..„_.. CIL Y t a .c as w m O .o m m z Q) a IT) z m . n a S any Ja�e9 c a i v EXHIBIT P ! OI P113 t +ssa. City of Rancho Cucamonga Nag g MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION , The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879, and DRC2014-00232 Public Review Period Closes: April 8, 2015 Project Name: Project Applicant: Peter Bhakta Project Location (also see attached map): Located within the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street - APN: 0229-341-11. Project Description: A proposal to amend the General Plan and Development Code to allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR)of 1.0 within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City, and a review of a proposal to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. /DC y—$ /S Adopted By EXHIBIT Q I- _ -110- - ..��- � !1ti__' _.-_ .. r _ _ „ _: linvii.,- .6:it_ ., ..,.„...= 12 — gmessrsss---=-_ II f7�•• --- -- ___ ,230 • ji� .- . • i3:FT �. I �_ g I :1:' �- - ' 10:11 ' CI,- 1 ��'.� �-1230-��� t+—a_�sr = i i 1 1 1. N 1 F '_ ..e■ii p■"® BMl'1208 o ---_Nt2i2_.__� N ` f iIF .. N L_J N •f j _ --- II --ice - -� 1 E I r i -, - (_ �_✓� `N._-119 '\_/\�--ti_�_ N ' ��j _i . _ -_�' q.- �Iieo--R __ __.x-= _____ _ :11-: 7170 f/ii �.._� N N -� I _44.i ` I 1S t!' 1// �__----- .�_� '- II /,20'x_- - V t!•• 1 41111 ! , ',so 13111111111,114111 ;1: f °=e:.... ;. T. Imo . f�.— '�.. --__ \ -- `II -, ▪ .... •a;..: fir / _. .-� .- -EI�A '` - :N�. "-r -- 7:-...Y-; E _ r: -- I°I'",. PROJECT SITE ;, Sr __"----z--:_ Rochester'I^��' •• , 11 . 119i I - � ,_____1,,,__,-- z______ ue a �{ ;ervoi 11 r.p {( u .. t ' Well \ N • ■ 1 141 —` \It` 1 N. J� - II ° u---� 'Well=== m �'. k - u �. ` o I o'p� .li iii; 1' i� 4.-/�` -- II r Ii iG -1 1 .»� 7----//:.:c.4.-?.: - �'N �"fl 1050 ti- -i•._ I I `ai�i?i: --- Well jl 1, " ;- R n n - r� �.r_•-y--+�T! •IN• - - -~A V- �1 RANCHO_� �_— -r`—.i Ctia ONGX—_ � 'CORP or 0 �J'I'1-~,:___--_y+∎ 1 •�-� a tl 3Reservd ' ~'� �I! 0 a' /\_ I• I' `'�•." I- —~`, ,`_J,Y YA : —NTT s ` f�.YY�°�- 'i .i- ;5. - �x�/02'd yNj 11' I S i _ I I••. 1 :23 • ♦ - -_ --'- = sT • •' ",.: - .- , t.)!Il., f /_„---.-\—\--..•..—..„--—.1°-"--..--.-5—......._ i,1 Water �- ' &1 . Ta n k : _ la w, Gltl III �r �- `1-� _- 1111' -we ii �. r'rI a y�9, I► �_. �_ lI�sso.��r so- - ___ ° WT -- 1- �� ---- $ ' - — ---- 963 t_,1 -1-____ I- Veil �� i 73 n - -� t it u d 4 )1., V II I a, �` _ I.. li ( I Print frfl5 J ;r , =; ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM �= ,, (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the .City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this • application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I 'and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological, drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. /y+!J�j Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: 1 ' W n a. TAW 4-• 00 fl7 4 bkriteAt • 0087`1 Project Title: FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY INC Name &Address of project owner(s): 16912 GRIDLEY PLACE, CERRITOS CA 90703 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor SAME AS ABOVE r. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 1 of 10 P116 Contact Person&Address: PETER BHAKTA WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY INC 16912 GRIDLEY PLACE, CERRITOS CA 90703 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): SAME AS ABOVE Telephone Number 562 412 1307 r: PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): ON PITTSBURG BETWEEN MARVISTA AND 4TH ST 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0229-341-11-0000 • *5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. ft.): 2.07 ACRES ' • • *6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 2 07 ACRES dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): NONE Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 ( P117 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project BUILDING AND SAFETY ELECTRICAL PLUMBING FIRE GRADING STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): CURRENTLY THE OT IS FLAT WITH NO VEGETATION Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 ( P118 • 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): NONE 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: NONE 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: HOTEL WITH SUITES DEVELOPED WITHIN 12 TO 18MONTHS 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial, etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): NONE Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 l P119 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? NO 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? NONE *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: NONE 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: NONE 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. in Septic Tank p Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) eCee n*�j />aM b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 P120 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): • 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: HOTEL TRANSIENT Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 C r P121 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 4 FLOORS WITH 56000 SQ FT 27) Indicate hours of operation: 24 HR 28) Number of employees: Total:25 Maximum Shift: 3 Time of Maximum Shift: S HRS 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): GUEST SERVICES ATTENDANT$12 PER HR HOUSEKEEPER $10 PER HR MANAGER $25 PER HR ASST MANAGER $17 PER HR OPERATIONS MANAGER $15 PER HR 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City:20 *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): NONE ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. YES ALL UTILITIES PRESENT Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 l_ P122 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. NONE SEE PHASE 1 REPORT 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. NO 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning CommissiorVPlanning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts,statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 03/15/2014 Signature: Title: CFO Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 P123 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 P124 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 • High School • Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 • Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 ATTACHMENT "A" P125 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 9 of 10 Rev.3/17/04 P126 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 10 of 10 Rev.3/17/04 P127 City of Rancho Cucamonga 44 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II _ s. _. • BACKGROUND . 1. Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877, Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 and Development Review DRC2014-00232 2. Related Files: n/a 3. Description of Project: A proposal to amend the General Plan and Development Code to allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0 within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City, and a review of a proposal to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission , Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street; APN: 0229-341-11. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Peter Bhakta Woodbridge Hospitality, Inc. 16912 Gridley Place Cerritos, California 90703 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park (IP) 6. Zoning: Industrial Park (IP) (GI) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is a parcel with an area of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres). The parcel is about 289 feet (east-west) by about 308 feet (north-south). The parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses/shrubs. The project site is bound on the north by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station. To the south and west are hotels (Towne Place Suites by Marriot and Holiday Inn Express). To the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue, is an industrial office building and another hotel (Homewood Suites by Hilton). The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding it is Industrial Park (IP) District. The property and the properties to the east, west, and south are also within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD). The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,050 feet and 1,046 feet, respectively. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None P128 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 2 GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD— California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District ER— Environmental Impact Report FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR- Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG— Reactive Organic Gases PMio—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x)Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality ( ) Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology& Soils (x)Greenhouse Gas ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (x) Hydrology&Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (x) Noise ( ) Land Use &Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities & Service Systems (x) Mandatory Findings of ( ) Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there • will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or Rev 2-26-13 P129 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 3 mitigated pursuant to that earli4 ER or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imp : pon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Date: 7 cx: IC Reviewed By: _e VW Date: ZC (S-- Rev 2-26-13 P130 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Wim Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation roto Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a scenic vista caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review Rev 2-26-13 P131 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporates Impact Impact by the City, the impact (if any) to a scenic resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The site is generally characterized by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station to the north, hotels to south and west, and an industrial office building and another hotel to the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. The site will be developed with a hotel that will be similar to the hotels on the adjoining parcels. Staff has determined that the architecture of the building is consistent with the design standards, guidelines, and policies established by the Planning Commission and City Council. The project complies with the City's technical requirements including minimum building, parking lot, and wall setbacks; parking; and landscape coverage as described in the Development Code. Approval by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission is required prior to construction of the building. City standards require the applicant to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally • permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded • that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the visual character or quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project will increase the number of street lights in the immediate vicinity and add lighting to illuminate the parking lot of the hotel. The design and placement of street lights will be required to comply with City standards including requirements for shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Although lighting can be a source of substantial glare, such lighting will be required to comply with the City standards for maximum height applicable to light poles and wall-mounted lights. The impact of lights on sensitive receptors such as residences will be limited as the nearest residences, an apartment complex to the west, are screened from the project site by existing commercial development between it and the project site. The impact is not considered significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same Rev 2-26-13 • P132 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to substantial light or glare caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The site is generally characterized by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station to the north, hotels to south and west, and an industrial office building and another hotel to the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The Rev 2-26-13 P133 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Imp act Incorpora ted Impact Impact General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to agricultural resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The site is generally characterized by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station to the north, hotels to south and west, and an industrial office building and another hotel to the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue. There are no agricultural uses within one mile of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally Rev 2-26-13 P134 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially with an Slp cant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to agricultural resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) O ( ) . substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include • Rev 2-26-13 • P135 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an pp 9 Significant coWithOn Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (502), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.$) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM and PM2.$) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMio), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Non-attainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are.set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis was prepared by Vista Environmental on April 25 2014 that utilizes the CalEEMod methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Rev 2-26-13 P136 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mason Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Short Term (Construction)Impacts Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) • Activity VOC NO CO SOx PM1u PM2.s Grading 3.10 32.40 21.88 0.02 8.49 5.05 Construction 4.60 28.29 20.81 0.03 1.98 1.92 Paving 2.26 19.84 13.42 0.02 1.41 1.19 Architectural Coatings 38.14 2.60 2.28 0.00 0.28 0.24 Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No No No No No No VOC =volatile organic compounds; NO,=oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SO,= oxides of sulfur; PMto and PM2.5= particulate matter Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis-(Table H)(CaIEEMod Output) Vista Environmental,April 25,2014 Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on-site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions that are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Rev 2-26-13 P137 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 • precursors. The proposed project is to construct and operate a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed building will result in approximately 38.14 lbs of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. The application of architectural coatings would occur after the completion of the paving phase. Per SCAQMD Rule 1113, the architectural coatings that would be applied after January 1, 2014 will be limited to an average of 50 grams per liter or less and the CalEEMod model default VOC emissions for non-residential interior architectural coatings have been adjusted accordingly. Per the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental on April 25, 2014, the architectural coating phase was modeled based on covering 30,510 square feet of non-residential exterior area and 91,529 square feet of non-residential interior area. The architectural coating.phase would occur over three weeks and would require up to five worker trips per day. The onsite equipment would consist of one air compressor, which is based on the CaIEEMod default equipment mix. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the expected uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project Rev 2-26-13 P138 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning-Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. Rev 2-26-13 P139 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith nan PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce MID emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban - Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lonq Term (Operational) Impacts Long Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of industrial buildings/uses in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Operational Air Pollution Emissions(lbs/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Area 1.62 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.11 1.03 0.87 0.01 0.08 0.08 Mobile 3.48 9.35 35.69 0.07 4.47 1.27 Total 5.21 10.38 36.58 0.08 4.55 1.35 Significant 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Significant No No No No No No Impact Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis-(Table K)(CaIEEMod Output) Vista Environmental,April 25,2014 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) • Lonq Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of Rev 2-26-13 P140 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated_Impact Impact the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 10) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 11) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 12) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 13) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 14) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 15) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 16) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 17) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally Rev 2-26-13 • • P141 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor—a hotel located to the south about 20 feet from the south property line of the project site. Toxic Air Contaminants The proposed project is the construction and operation of a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms. Truck traffic is not a typical characteristic of hotels. Per the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental on April 25, 2014, particulate matter (PM) from diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in most areas and according to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, prepared by GARB, about 80 percent of the outdoor TAC cancer risk is from diesel exhaust. Some chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde have been listed as carcinogens by State Proposition 65 and the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants program. Due to the nominal number of diesel truck trips generated by the proposed project, a less than significant toxic air contaminant impact would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project and no - mitigation would be required. Therefore, the impacts will be less-than-significant. Localized Significance Thresholds Per the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental on April 25, 2014, [the] on-going operations of the proposed project would not exceed the local NON, CO, PMto and PM2.5 thresholds of significance...therefore, the on-going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations- related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, the impacts will be less-than-significant. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Hotspots A carbon monoxide (CO) hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. CO hotspots have the potential to violate State and Federal CO standards at intersections. Per the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental on April 25, 2014, to determine if the proposed project could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards, a sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential for CO "hot spots"at a number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced speeds and vehicle queuing, "hot spots" typically occur at intersections with a Level of Service (LOS) E or worse. The LOS is a measure used...to quantify the delay Rev 2-26-13 P142 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an pp 9 Sitmpsct t corporate Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact that occurs at intersections from additional vehicular traffic. When an intersection operates at LOS E or F, SCAQMD recommends performing a CO hotspot analysis if the volume to capacity ratio increases by two percent or more. The proposed project is not large enough to meet the City's criteria for preparation of a traffic impact analysis, which is set based on the potential of creating delays at the nearby intersections. Since the proposed project was below the criteria for analysis of traffic impacts it is unlikely that the proposed project would decrease the LOS of any intersection. Therefore no CO "hotspot"modeling was performed and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on-going use of the proposed project. Therefore, the impacts will be less- than-significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC20l 14-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies-among-the-subject.development-districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally • differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. The proposed project is the construction and operation of a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms. Typically, hotels do not create objectionable odors that are normally associated with, for example, heavy manufacturing operations. No adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 P143 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an PP 9 Significant coWithOn Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local • or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, _ vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The site is generally characterized by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station to the north, hotels to south and west, and an industrial office building and another hotel to the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue. The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources - Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSFLF). Per the Habitat Suitability Evaluation prepared by EnviroPlus Consulting on July 2, 2014, Brian Drake, a biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Section 10 (a) (1) (A) permit number TE-006328-5 expiring 1/23/2018) to survey for the federally endangered Dehli Sands Flower-loving Fly (DSFLF; Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis) conducted a habitat suitability evaluation of Parcel 11 (APN 0229-341-11), a 2-acre site in Rancho Cucamonga, California on May 12, 2014. The site was part of a larger protocol survey area that was conducted in 2001 and 2002 and called the Bixby Ranch site. No DSFLF were found during those surveys. Mr. Drake found that the soils at the site were generally compacted and contaminated with asphalt and cobble and inconsistent with Delhi series fine sands on which DSFLF depend and Rev 2-26-13 P144 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact therefore not suitable DSFLF habitat. At the request of Gilbert Goodlett, Geary Hund, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service entomologist visited the site on June 4 and concurred with the determination that the site was not suitable for DSFLF. Mr. Hund's letter of concurrence is included on pages 2 and 3. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on this resource. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to candidate, sensitive, or special status species caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities and no riparian habitat exists on-site. Furthermore, the project site is surrounded by street improvements and development as described in 4.a above. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact Of any) to candidate, sensitive, or special status species caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. Furthermore, the project site is surrounded by street improvements and development as described in 4.a) above. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Rev 2-26-13 • P145 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and 0RC2014-00232 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With is Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to candidate, sensitive, or special status species caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to federally protected wetlands caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. However, as the project site is surrounded by street improvements and development as described in 4.a) above, and there are no trees on the property, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or.conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) There are no trees on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance and project implementation would have no impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded Rev 2-26-13 P146 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? • c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 17.18 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to historical resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, Rev 2-26-13 P147 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant corporae SlImact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require _incorporation _ of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Per Government Code Section 65352.3(a)(1), the City requested a list of California Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). A list of tribes was received from the NAHC on October 9, 2014. On October 30, 2014, the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the tribes identified in the list provided by the NAHC. The City received one response, via email, from a representative of the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh (Kit'c) Nation. Per the emailed correspondence, the project (Cucamonga) locale lies in an area where the traditional territories of the Kizh(Kitc) Gabrieleno, villages adjoined and overlapped with each other, at least during the Late Prehistoric and Protohistoric Periods. The homeland of the Kizh (Kitc) Gabrielenos, probably the most influential Native American group in aboriginal southern California (Bean and Smith 1978a:538), was centered in the Los Angeles Basin, and reached as far east as the San Bernardino-Riverside area. The homeland of the Serranos was primarily the San Bernardino Mountains, including the slopes and lowlands on the north and south flanks. Whatever the linguistic affiliation, Native Americans in and around the project area exhibited similar organization and resource procurement strategies. Villages were based on clan or lineage groups. Their home/base sites are marked by midden deposits, often with bedrock mortars. During their seasonal rounds to exploit plant resources, small groups would migrate within their traditional territory in Rev 2-26-13 P148 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 22 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact search of specific plants and animals. Their gathering strategies often left behind signs of special use sites, usually grinding slicks on bedrock boulders, at the locations of the resources. Therefore in order to protect our resources we would like to request one of our experienced & certified Native American monitors to be on site during any and all ground disturbances. To address this request, the following mitigation shall apply: 2) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh (Kit'c) Nation to discuss monitoring of the project to ensure that prehistoric archaeological resources that may be encountered during grading are protected or preserved for study. The applicant shall submit the results of this consultation to the City prior to issuance of permits for grading of the site. The City also contacted the San Bernardino County Museum on January 27, 2015 for a historical resources review. Robin Laska, Assistant Center Coordinator, responded in writing on February 3, 2015. Per the correspondence provided, there are no previously inventoried historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. Furthermore, based on available information, the potential for the presence of historical resources — prehistoric/historic archaeological resources, historic resources, cultural landscapes, and ethnic resources—within the project area is"low". • General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the • same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to archeological resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 3) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or Rev 2-26-13 • P149 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga 0RC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With man Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated SiImp c Impact pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to paleontological resources, sites, and/or geologic features caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The site is generally characterized by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station to the north, hotels to south and west, and an industrial office building and another hotel to the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue. Public improvements such as the street and most associated public infrastructure are already in-place. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 P150 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp 9 Significant corporiae Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to human remains caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i). Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) O O (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the Rev 2-26-13 P151 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR02014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With fic PP 9 Significant Imp Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault is about 3 miles to the northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies about 6.5 miles to the north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is about 17 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is about 19 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to geology and soils will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMta emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMto emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Rev 2-26-13 • P152 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The site is not on a slope of 30 percent or greater, or within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Dehli Fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent).since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to geology and soils will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Dehli Fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally • permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the wastewater disposal requirements for those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 P153 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wan Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (/) ( ) () . indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance - The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N2O], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures Rev 2-26-13 P154 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (Soaping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM10, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM10, and PM2.s levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow-hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to greenhouse gases generated by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Project Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect source. Per the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis was prepared by Vista Environmental on April 25 2014, the project would result in the emissions of carbon dioxide [002], methane [CH4], and nitrous oxide [N2O], and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the tables below, the proposed project would result in a total of 10.42 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 436.1 MTCO2eq/yr for area sources and 744.80 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 1,191.32 MTCO2eq/yr. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associate&with diesel Rev 2-26-13 P155 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sigmfic t Mitigation Imp act Incorporated Imp act Impact powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Construction greenhouse gas emissions are: Short-Term (Construction) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MT/year) CO2 CH4 N20 Tota11 2015 10.37 0.00 0.00 10.42 Amortized 0.346 0.00 0.00 0.347 Total2 1: MTCO2E 2: Amortized over 30-years Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis-(Table M)(CaIEEMod Output) Vista Environmental,April 25 2014 Although the emissions are less than the de facto SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT/year, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to further reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. . 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Lonq Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the Rev 2-26-13 P156 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With do PP 9 Significant corporion Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. Operational greenhouse gas emissions are: Long-Term (Operational) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MT/year) CO2 CH4 N20 . Total' Area Sources 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 400.12 0.01 0.01 402.15 Mobile Sources 744.14 0.03 0.00 744.80 • Solid Waste 3.83 0.23 0.00 8.59 Water/Wastewater 20.96 0.15 0.00 25.36 Total 1,169.05 0.42 0.01 1,180.9 1: MTCO2E - Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis-(Table M)(CaIEEMod Output) Vista Environmental, April 25 2014 The project is the construction and operation of a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) and therefore potentially would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/van pools. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The long term operation of the project emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. Rev 2-26-13 P157 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop the site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The proposed project is the construction and operation of a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping; shade trees; Rev 2-26-13 P158 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact bike racks; walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks; and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly(AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to greenhouse gases generated by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Rev 2-26-13 P159 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant nl Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? - h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The proposed project is a hotel and does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact Of any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by, those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed project is a hotel and does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded Rev 2-26-13 P160 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially with Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by, those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) There is no school located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest school to the project site, The Ontario Center (Elementary) School, is about 1.36-miles to the west at 835 N. Center Avenue in the City of Ontario. However, as noted above in 8.a and 8.b above, the proposed project is a hotel and does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. • General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by, those projects will be'evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by, those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 P161 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The site is located within an Airport Land Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located about 1.6 miles northeast of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Per FAR Part 77, Subpart C, any object with a height of 200 feet above the established airport elevation would be an obstruction to air navigation. The airport is at an established elevation of 925 feet above sea level (ASL). The proposed building has a pad elevation of about 1,048 feet (maximum) and, when combined with the overall height of the building of about 45 feet (maximum), will have a height of about 168 feet above the established airport elevation. No impact is anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally • permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to airport land use plans caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located about 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. The site has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access plans and evacuation routes caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 P162• Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant Imp act Incorporated Imp act Impact h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to the exposure of people or structures to wildfire risk caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) Rev 2-26-13 P163 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wuh Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? - h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by RMA-Riverside, Inc. on October 6, 2014 which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant Rev 2-26-13 • P164 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by RMA-Riverside, Inc. on October 6, 2014 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by RMA-Riverside, Inc. on October 6, 2014 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for Rev 2-26-13 P165 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga 0RC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. Rev 2-26-13 P166 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact Of any) to drainage patterns that results in erosion caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in flooding caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial • Rev 2-26-13 P167 Initial Study for . City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Fotanual With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated s Impact Impact additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing or planned stormwater drainage systems caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site will be undergoing significant redevelopment; therefore, the project is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: Grading Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the Rev 2-26-13 P168 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wim Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to housing due to flood hazards caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to flood flow patterns caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the Rev 2-26-13 P169 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 43 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to flooding caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. No adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Rev 2-26-13 P170 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 44 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The site is generally characterized by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station to the north, hotels to south and west, and an industrial office building and another hotel to the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue. The proposal is for the construction and operation of a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres). The site will be developed with a hotel that will be similar to the hotels on the adjoining parcels. No adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to established communities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site land use designation is Industrial Park. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan with the exception of the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) for which a General Plan Amendment (related file: DRC2014-00877) is under review to permit the FAR for hotels and motels to be 1.0. The proposed project does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is for the construction and operation of a 4- story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres). The site will be developed with a hotel that will be similar to the hotels on the adjoining parcels. The development of the site will be consistent with the land use designations as described in the Development Code and General Plan. The minimum building, parking lot, and wall setbacks; dock and storage area screening; and landscape coverage are consistent with the Development Code and • the General Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally Rev 2-26-13 P171 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and 0RC2014-00232 Page 45 • Less Than Significant Less Potentially at Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to any land use plan, policy, or regulation caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. • c) The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The site is generally characterized by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station to the north, hotels to south and west, and an industrial office building and another hotel to the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue. The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources - Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly(DSFLF). Per the Habitat Suitability Evaluation prepared by EnviroPlus Consulting on July 2, 2014, Brian Drake, a biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service_(Section 10.(a) (1) (A) permit number TE-006328-5. expiring 1/23/2018) to survey for the federally endangered Deihl Sands Flower-loving Fly(DSFLF; Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdomlnalls) conducted a habitat suitability evaluation of Parcel 11 (APN 0229-341-11), a 2-acre site in Rancho Cucamonga, California on May 12, 2014. The site was part of a larger protocol survey area that was conducted in 2001 and 2002 and called the Bixby Ranch site. No DSFLF were found during those surveys. Mr. Drake found that the soils at the site were generally compacted and contaminated with asphalt and cobble and inconsistent with Delhi series fine sands on which DSFLF depend and therefore not suitable DSFLF habitat. At the request of Gilbert Goodlett, Geary Hund, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service entomologist visited the site on June 4 and concurred with the determination that the site was not suitable for DSFLF. Mr. Hund's letter of concurrence is included on pages 2 and 3. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on this resource. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the • same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to candidate, sensitive, or special status species caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 • P172 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 46 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: gnaai ghg hr asoo Mitigation Significant nt No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the-maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to mineral resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to mineral resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 P173 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 47 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wiN Than pp 9 Significant Incorporated Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) (✓ ) O ( ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) O (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 - miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The principal source of noise that would impact the project site is traffic. Both of the aforementioned streets are relatively minor with relatively light traffic. The project site is about 300 feet east of Milliken Avenue which is a major north-south traffic corridor and, the closest, major source of traffic noise. The hotel will not be significantly impacted by noise as occupancy of the hotel will be highest in the evening when traffic level on adjoining streets, and the corresponding traffic-generated noise, is significantly less than the traffic level in the day when the hotel would be largely vacant. Also, due to the presence of another hotel and other buildings between the project site and Milliken Avenue, traffic noise will be further attenuated by the bulk of these buildings. Therefore, the noise impact will be less than significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other Rev 2-26-13 P174 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 48 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Uga Significant pp 9 Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to noise caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented b) Noise generated by passenger vehicle traffic traveling to and from the site will be the primary source of noise from the project site. Most of the activities directly related to the hotel, with the exception of, for example, recreational activity in the pool area, will be conducted within the building. The nearest noise sensitive receptor is a hotel located to the south about 20 feet from the south property line of the project site. As noted above, the principal source of noise in the area is traffic traveling along Milliken Avenue and, therefore, the noise generated by the project will be less than significant. In any event, the mitigation measures listed below will further reduce interior noise levels: 1) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. The measures listed under 12.d also will further reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact(if any) due to excessive ground borne vibration or noise caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) Noise generated by passenger vehicle traffic traveling to and from the site will be the primary source of noise from the project site. Most of the activities directly related to the hotel, with the exception of, for example, recreational activity in the pool area, will be . conducted within the building. The nearest noise sensitive receptor is a hotel located to the south about 20 feet from the south property line of the project site. As noted above, the principal source of noise in the area is traffic traveling along Milliken Avenue and, therefore, the noise generated by the project will be less than significant. Rev 2-26-13 P175 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 49 Less Than Significant Less Potentially Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s an Mitigation on S. iant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase; on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed,the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above • noise standards or halted. 4) Stationary construction noise sources such as generators or pumps must be located at least 100 feet from sensitive land uses, as feasible, or at maximum distance when necessary to complete work near sensitive land uses. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 5) Construction staging areas must be located as far from noise sensitive land uses as feasible. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout Rev 2-26-13 P176 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 50 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than pp 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 6) Throughout construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with included noise attenuating devices and are properly maintained. This mitigation measure shall be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 7) Idling equipment must be turned off when not in use. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 8) Equipment must be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 9) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan and is one mile from a public airport. The Project is located approximately one mile north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 P177 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 51 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact t Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to excessive noise levels generated by airports in the vicinity of those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. • 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review Rev 2-26-13 • P178 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 52 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact by the City, the impact (if any) due to population growth caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site is vacant land and, therefore, there will be no displacement of housing or people. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of-any project-located-on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing housing caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) The project site is vacant land and, therefore, there will be no displacement of housing or people. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) c) Schools? O ( ) O (✓) Rev 2-26-13 P179 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 53 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant ig an PP 9 Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Parks? () () () (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street and would be served by Fire Station #4 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard located about 0.85-mile to the north of the site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to fire protection services caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) . Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to police protection services caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Rev 2-26-13 P180 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 54 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With man pp 9 Significant c Mitigation to Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to schools caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is the Rancho Cucamonga Sports Complex at 8378 Rochester Avenue located approximately 1.37 miles north of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently,the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to parks caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand, but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less-than-significant impact. Additionally, the • Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Rev 2-26-13 P181 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 55 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant Im No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. • General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to other public facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the'applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that • substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is the Rancho Cucamonga Sports Complex at 8378 Rochester Avenue located approximately 1.37 miles north of the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the • developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to recreational facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Rev 2-26-13 P182 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 56 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Imp Impact corporOn Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • b) Refer to 15.a above. 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The proposed project is the construction and operation of a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms. Per the to the Trip Generation and Distribution Analysis prepared by Arch Beach Consulting on April 16, 2014, implementation of the proposed project will generate 789 daily trips, 61 weekday AM peak hour trips (38 inbound, 23 outbound), and 65 weekday PM peak hour trips (30 inbound, 35 outbound). As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 P183 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 57 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant tigat Than PP g SiImpcanl Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the performance of the transportation/traffic circulation system caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Per the Trip Generation and Distribution Analysis prepared by Arch Beach Consulting on April 16, 2014, implementation of the proposed project will generate 789 daily trips, 61 weekday AM peak hour trips (38 inbound, 23 outbound), and 65 weekday PM peak hour trips (30 inbound, 35 outbound). A qualitative assessment of the addition of 61 AM peak hour trips and 65 PM peak hour trips, when distributed through the project vicinity, would result in a maximum of 43 AM and 46 PM peak hour trips at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street. Using the 50-trip criteria that is the City's basis for requiring the preparation of a traffic impact analysis, the proposed project would not require the preparation of a traffic impact analysis or comprehensive traffic impact assessment. As a result, based on the traffic generation potential of the proposed project, there will not be a significant impact to the surrounding transportation system. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment . DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the Rev 2-26-13 P184 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 58 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wati man PP 9 Significant otenti t Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a congestion management program caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) Located about one mile north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. • General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air traffic patterns caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) of transportation design features associated with those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 P185 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 59 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction including bicycle racks at the main entrance area, preferential parking for car/vanpools, pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks, etc. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels.and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause • significant environmental effects? Rev 2-26-13 P186 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 60 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? • g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels • have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater treatment requirements caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the Rev 2-26-13 P187 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 61 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wnh Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater treatment facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to storm water drainage facilities caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water supplies caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. • Rev 2-26-13 P188 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 62 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant corporate Significant No Imp act Incorporated Impact Impact e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater treatment capacity caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review • by the City, the impact (if any) to landfill capacity caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. No impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded Rev 2-26-13 P189 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 63 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant coWithon Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City,, the impact (if any) to solid waste statutes and regulations caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) • quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) O (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future • • projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street. The site is generally characterized by a California Highway Patrol (CHP) station to the north, hotels to south and west, and an industrial office building and another hotel to the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue. The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources - Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSFLF). Per the Habitat Suitability Evaluation prepared by EnviroPlus Consulting on July 2, 2014, Brian Drake, a biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Section 10 (a) (1) (A) permit number TE-006328-5 expiring 1/23/2018) to survey for the federally endangered Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly(DSFLF; Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis) conducted a habitat suitability evaluation of Parcel 11 (APN 0229-341-11), a 2-acre site in Rancho Cucamonga, California on May 12, 2014. The site was part of a larger protocol survey area that was conducted in 2001 and 2002 and called the Bixby Ranch site. No DSFLF were found during those surveys. Mr. Drake found that the soils at the site were generally compacted and contaminated with asphalt and cobble and inconsistent with Delhi series fine sands on which DSFLF depend and therefore not suitable DSFLF habitat. At the request of Gilbert Goodlett, Geary Hund, U.S. Rev 2-26-13 P190 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 64 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wan Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Fish and Wildlife Service entomologist visited the site on June 4 and concurred with the determination that the site was not suitable for DSFLF. Mr. Hand's letter of concurrence is included on pages 2 and 3. As the project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities, no riparian habitat exists on-site. Also, the site does not does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas nor wetland habitat. There are no trees on the project site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on biological resources. The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 17.18 (Historic Preservation). The City contacted the San Bernardino County Museum on January 27, 2015 for a historical resources review. Per the San Bernardino County Museum, there are no previously inventoried historical resources recorded within or adjacent to the project area. Furthermore, based on available information, the potential for the presence of historical resources — prehistoric/historic archaeological resources, historic resources, cultural landscapes, and ethnic resources — within the project area is "low". The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts._to cultural resources. .Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to biological and/or cultural resources caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. Rev 2-26-13 P191 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 65 General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the cumulative impacts (if any) caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. c) Development of the site would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than- significant levels. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 will allow hotels and motels to have a floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.0, i.e. 100 percent, within the development districts where they are permitted or conditionally permitted in the City. Currently, the maximum FAR that applies to hotels and motels is the same as the maximum FAR that applies to any other building proposed within the same development district. The maximum FAR varies among the subject development districts but generally ranges between 0.50 and 1.0 (50 to 100 percent). The City has concluded that the FAR for hotels and motels should be 1.0 (100 percent) since hotels and motels have operating characteristics and technical requirements that are unique and generally differ from those of a typical commercial or industrial building. The adoption of the amendments do not preclude the review by the City of any project located on other parcels within the City. When the applications for those projects are submitted for review by the City, the environmental effects caused by those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive and/or have been attached (on a CD) to this document for review: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) Rev 2-26-13 P192 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 66 (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (T) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis (Vista Environmental, April 25, 2014) (T) Habitat Suitability Evaluation (EnviroPlus Consulting, July 2, 2014) (T) Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly [Focused Adult Survey] (EnviroPlus Consulting, November 8, 2001) (T) Trip Generation and Distribution Analysis (Arch Beach Consulting, April 16, 2014) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (RMA-Riverside, Inc. on October 6, 2014) Rev 2-26-13 P193 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879 and DRC2014-00232 Page 67 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: Date: • Print Name and Title: Rev 2-26-13 P194 City of Rancho Cucamonga ' MITIGATION MONITORING Z .. PROGRAM _Project File No.: DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879, and DRC2014-00232 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • P195 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2014-00877, DRC2014-00879, and DRC2014-00232 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. • 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. C o P196 a03 a) c E E ._ 0 0 0) U a' C C v v C 0 Z N N N N a) E tn a O To _ Tu > a c > _0 C a Q to at i0 C > 0 - 0. C I- ^ 0 CC co O . O 0 .w } V � a 0 > • a a O 0 1 Q U) C 0 co CO C a) co O O O J E C d ad O cp Q O O O O O N a) m o N N N N Z 0 0 _ 7 -- ix a) .CC __.. _ CC N F— O U) 0 N to >. co J C C 0 C w • E O v j O 7 .0 Cr O at • a � _ > u_ �L ti 0 0 0 m at ca o 0 U Q ui or O p a' c Z .Q0 N OL O C a O m r- o O L ❑ _ ❑ 0 ° a a a CO Z N o Y O Co c o = o) 0 0 a) a) a C = a . >y a N a) 2 (0 'o o C aci •a c :- m '� .L�. 3 m o m o d o t c a o L - C n c N .0 CO c 2 2 C a o w o it .cu T N Z y- co .m N a) ,O w o a) N a0 O 00a co O E a) 2 Q � ° w c �m 2 m (c°c° -00 co c aO) m oU' CD '°t0 H o a) Y E @ °' aOr n nafU100-`oL. E >� `� Qa2 a` a m a m O Q 70 E a) m o a'� o °c' o uto '> 0 > 0 n E C a) (• 0 W• a 0 E - In h a 0 .= 0 b a c ca d 'c E C a c m• ckti H c o O)C -C EcL rn� � a a oNOOOC -° m L ° ❑ 0 00 0 2 ti m HcEO > NOma23 oa L �• n3 CT- E co °- 'co aim con > > incr, 0E2 • NO yo n >, W a� ucU � MCo oc ` 0m '� 0 NC0 oC ni -. EO •Vi 2m � m o .- ac no _ co 2 > 0 c -0 .- E 00 a) Y o c a 0 c y 0 m E m 0 0 = ° m ° ? o N c co '0 Z 8 'EU ° c n � UD0E _ - c = 0 CO i0aooO E O L ._ to C .'->' 0 O N C o N O O C t=o •L.• •a_ O n �. - 0 0 0 O 0 C -O > _ C 0 m f0 0 0 �' U N 0 J - - N O Y N w o 3 :0 C L O a-cu 0- X00 rn oaaEi �aZi` � 0 ,7) 76- E c E m ammmLd N cu N Q d c N a) - U ,m L • a) c (0 C O 'a to O O M N m O v rn ` a) 0 rn ,O o 0 o O O C ,.., C o 0 n- a °' EQ U. E0C � ON0 � a� caoN -000 . Q ❑ .N. mmo N0 y p Y .6 CE � E c0g0 >, � y 2oaoU ` .E .N " ` E 0 @ � ac ,�°n- m ii v C 00M a` 8 -01 DE. 200 m m °? ScCm0a aoric (ac g Y„ tr _ u - 3 0) aa) - 'C Q mo aa) aE °' ° 'IC a) ac0� _9. � ° U oU � Q ama Qin N▪ U ao. :., a i0 o a o ¢ 2 E in . N c v • P197 o a c E o O U c Ca 0 'Cr 'Cr v 'Cr• v ni O CO Z (N N N N N V V V V' V R a) co O C C) - .. C Oct > 0 C • O O '.-. V U 0 •_ t w 2 > a 0 0 0 0 C C C C C C 0 0 0 0 U) U) U) U) N U) U U O U U C C C C C C ` 7 2 2 ` co (0 Co co co a C a a a a a a UI U) n' (/) n' .4_ 0 C C CO C C O w 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O U O 0 01 V i 3 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C w O O O a) a) O c a C a c E y Q) a) a) C) a) a) > > C. 7 7 I- > CC Cf K CC CC Ct ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O) >. M C U t- 'C C ✓• 7 O •c O' N 2• if- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) a 0) d .= ao !_" C C C O O aE a) '- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c' w C0 co co co on co co to co m CO L ' " O 'O a) C a) - C_ 'O O >.4-0 L O)Q 'o U) ❑ 'O 0 0 a) T C € C a] L .o r N a — C = ) O a3 o) C a) c m > 3@ o co L " w 0 0 -o w E E 0 o o m � a o m ry 0 0 n o ._ m o d d d _T O .N C cn N a) 'O N a) 0 L U (9 _C T o) a) dC U S C m C C C o-" O O c w C N °) a V ° C ° U m N O U U U ._ E -o =o g E > E c m �? �.E `o '5 ax) o a) 0 o . u) co — 'O a N Oc O U - L CO ai oCc > U) a amE Ex3 a-O) -5 'i o 'gin ° ~ E ur `n = Uyo m r o0 �L' o L., x o °)a. c - 3 .E o 3 U 3 -o mM3 ° L co ° ° 0 > omo)' yca o_ � v ? a ma) > -o N O O 7 0 O O «O -O O - O" c T U 5 .L-, O O_ U N •J O • "' > .`_D' C O a) V O O O U) C X CO O)-O CO a, U) C U) 3 0 co a O_ C -o a) -C ••= n) )n N a) m o c o d L L c a m C E a `o_ 7 U a s CO CO a m a) CA E CIO a '> N Q.. C O " . Oj o) 3 O C O a) a) co d N OO N L _ d ` = N V) T -E) O _O U N •.• 3 5).UI.. T O U C -O O O - C QI N `- O Q)In-Z Cr U C O. O T a) a) N N O a N C N C E N U) " O YO 'C• N a) a) C m C n O a O) -O 'O U _O N 'O :- a) C O m m . N U) O a) CA Ul L L C) o c a) - O d a) 0 y C O C C in L O Ul a'U -0 .v^Cr) C C U) L a) .' C O U) L.7 U .O O L CU ` C) O a x c C 0 (On -O CO D o a Q W al 1_ C a p .0 O CO U) CA (a O O• N•CO• C ` ` O C d > 'O O N N t O c. O. O co a) :.0 a) U c C Vl E dl C O >. O N N .0 N co U o �• co � � $ 3d ° au' onm � � m � na� oo > ° cn3N � � OOEN0O0 o0 'U > d 2 d E m E UU o • • • • • • L :o o 2 S L c �d ¢ u) o FwO -ate Um a 2En o N. P198 r C O !° to a c E O 0 lc 0 ' 0 • c ca 0 V co CO CO M CO CO CO N Z V N N N N N V N N N CO a r V C a) C a) I a-• a) co > O c 0 o -0 0 c L w a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O 0 1 U) 0) N 0) N u) co u) N u) C C 1 C C C. C C C C C co co co co co co co co co as C a a a a a a O_ a a a .._ 0 O i.+ O O O O O O O O O O rn c10i 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 C )C N a) N N N a) a) N N a) 0 ° a m m a a a a) a) a) H > a a a a cc a a a a a co T co C U 'C C O 0 O C 0- M "L u• `. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) co a m N C ao N ti C C O O i a a i " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m a a a a m a a a CO U > 'O 0 O N m 0)O - O L 0) O N .Z 0) m L a) C° C C U N N L„ O o C r L 0 Li") C i5 aS E E c m CO 0 Th. « U °-o ,.- � L _ ° = rn o � ,°_ m � L a 3 � 0 u) ca m '— � m x ° w °-) 3 cc) v 3 � a) ai a) ui o Dm3 0 ca) a) E32 La) cn a) o haw La ° 2a > O N a) C co N C O �_ .E L 0 -p T N a) a) a C p 0 C p O tl) as N .47'm N CO O _c O 'O Of a O a u! a) L X •U a) C "O 0 C "0 L- w c � ° - a) E .m a ° of ° oo _ oa) - > mac � � CO "0 a L a) co U .0 C 'D > E a a L '- p •- ._ N . C - C N L N C O o ,C O > > ] L 'm o m N u o E c o o Q ° Q a) o c O O O .N.. N (n t - � E CD N '� c E g a o ' o) ui O = -6 U — m N N 0 N C to N 0 O p U N C N C E ` _ Y U a) ° .0 a)• L0 ca_c co a) co'- Nma oornp E ` u, 0a EmO Ec O "E cp omN ° '� ° 3vi > 3c� Sao) E ... o Um ENN EN , c Z co O OU > ° C ca N .0 N N a) Q O a C m .0 O N Y O N L M O N O C C C "p 3 C C j O y C j N Q N .p L a C N U C U a) N N O (a u) O N L a) C L .° O c a) C y CO O > E -o > a) u `m ° '� ui � m 3 'co m E m y •3 a) .? c r0i_) co m-o 2 ca m o °i_c RaCO 20P 2C � 0) a C "' LfOg .c a) cnm ° � m ° po m ca.0 E y co u) o o E nm w co ao co ma .0 ° C ma) aa) o 2 w o C N CO .E5= w O N N ° co N a) a) N = N O N -p N D N O = a) a 5 0co) w0 0cpi0) p ; ua)) E > o ° jc°i v .� �° � .. > m c - - 7 'S °—) C ° � m cOi- aa)i a y 0 0 L L .0 0 .E )0 ° a) Edo m a ° ° c d a) — CO o 'c — aN) = E 3 0) — E « c' i o_ or 1— `031- � °i a > `o JNaaco < c Q _N E Q -o Qo _a `m Qo N a c — — ao m r r O U P199 o f w a c E O 0 :� U C to o v V v fn 2 M M M co co to in c O C ti N •L V a) R C 0 . a to O 0 L W ✓ 'L 2 > °a °a °a ° °a c Ft0 ❑ o O O O U O C w a) N a) N co V a) EC > > > > cc > co C U •C C ✓ 7 0 E 0 D to a C) a) 5 o ' c C C N ❑ a) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Z 42 a a a at a a) a) - a) a) m it U o c 1._,) o 3 CD f0 ID W U a O) N _ a) W a) -o U -O a) (0 C (a .c .m N Z r c m to '- .. o C 0 t.. U 0 C C U O 0 O .c m .0 m .c 0 m to o N o 0 o c m o � ° . 0 o toO1 a o oS 0 0) c D "O m o a U 0 o f co -- N .N a) a m N N m N C N 3 2C) N 2 .0 a m E CO O o N @ � viocr ° E ' w > LcE mm ,n ,... `) m yoCOta m m a a) 3 0 o m c) a) c m m am m .N me E -O c - E m "' U N L N a O a CO d .0 pU .0 '>O E 0 o) o 'O U C t _(b.' /4 Q m c p N U N O m O c O m '- O C c` to m o CO . O CO o .... .00omc Ec _T `omm ao mo o ._ .` mrnoa 3 o-00 ? m atce � ONC) ccoN « rna.mcac923> EU - c0C_ ON N O Q c O -C N w m -E .0 a ,N CO c ` c U m 0 y a a) p • U m 0• a) o O "' O E m « CA'- o Q U 0 ., a m o m c0 .2 co m o 5 N o CO ° 3 m c L m E C o co Y m 2 o c .0.)— m • 01) c7 " ro O a) _ - N m 0 U o m N o C U o ton CO o .° U E _0 E o m u) °- c 0. m ri .-,7, .c a rn'w S m a>> . . o _o N m a) U m p 0O 2 o C C C Z C m U m a) C CO L y'an U c m .0 ai E O c a) ' a= m 0 O c .c (o c y 0 o _ O Q) -O C C C ' O E U a) O co N < p c.=E 0-'-• aA E >. c J C O � u m ya3 E � � tIdIHll! fluiDhUU- o cO g) a) m .4coa`> mc y r a) a) N O) m r m E >= m ° m m m _ m o c o L$ 0- l00 ° EEm2tooS `m C I c 0 N E E o 0 to mCm 0. mm mE c � a) a $ m ° m3 � y .o a 9) 5 _ to r • P200 o so CD a c E O 0 :674U C C co O CO Z N V V 7 M N Cu 'O -e - o C w a) CL) CO C 0 O Cu 1. O rz 2 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C 'C C 2 O O O O N a a a a c c N N N N .e- O O O T.: 0 O O O O ca CD 0 C V a) N a) N Liz O > '> > > CD 'C a) a) a) a) H > a cC a cC DC ifT co C O .o C 4- . O+ = O .0 00 2 0 E u. tt) m 0] [0 0 0) m' a. 0) a) c a o N c c O 0 0.2 et• ° a a a m a O O >.'O — a) a3 C O a) U) O C c N O) V O > p N L a) W" a) -0 > - C C C Y co a) a) L O O O O L O)w O O = ,C a) > a) a) .c .c _ .- a) • CO L C � .40Eapa o � 00 ° 'm ` aa) ~ -0 omEo L, E --a0L yam = L °c o0 o (a oo O C E m a° a) 0 • .wc-. (n ,._- E .- E o c o c ai m u, � °? io mZc " °- 0 .0o) cm -o EoEm ° a c aC m o = o c 0ya) NO Cl..) = 0a E ma) au s > N2EOC u - c • oEma-- o 03 E oor ° ° L cm ? t L a) y 120 to Em CL a) 0 0 N a) N �L O E = C a p ,a) 0 p ..=_(-3 O)> L O CO O .a N -o O a) N C O ` C .o 'C CuY E t_ Cu F O a, 0 = -° E a co a Ol-O ... -O O 3 O p :J 7 N a) C a C N co c 0'm m co a a`�i ° > p o cu '� `o ° ai m'r-°) .o o m -0 > o o) a o c o , o r om « � m�oo c � ao � rna° mm 0 EE03 a °_002)_ -ay (/) CL O Q c y O U V O O .� m O y O O O a.a C p . 0)L O T> p a O > r C .N a) O L C m a) "O N .N. O N '.' O Q) a3 a1 .N a 0- C1- L ow L .0 N O O w L O U p T-cm a) C u! c " , -00a ,7,.0 C U! N O a1 a] O a a 3 ._. O co 0 a) Ol L 0 T YO y E ` 0 C O tO O N N .N C N C) 0 N N N W e Cu O. h ® U E O N 'C O O a , p 'y 0 p a. fa a) V) - C ® > .� a) 2' E mu u) a) 0 -o - O)= t, L j c O"y -o S) O > 'O O a) _ a U O = ` L ... N Q'" ° 0 3 C to cnn i/1 •O) m 0l) L = 0) D .- o o a) E Q > N O CO a (/' O 0 N O a O) E �' N C ° L 'C N O C (pi) E a) U a) E C m p w a c � , .ay T(a 0)°� O o E u=) E ° ti Q ns o ° cum w= E ° =o •E o a o _ cc a cpta OETn „9 ,E > oo oa) c = 0 0 a) L co N N a) a a) a1 'C = = .) O` a (a O m (1 O U a) '3E Fm `Eaa `om0 � m '00- maao )- EOEEE • • • rn° a a E E N M C P201 o m w c c E • 0 0 :10v U C c co o Cl) Z M V V V V V V' co A a) C • C 4=. o 0• V a a1 C O y o V O ,_ L c d 'C 2 > 0 ¢ ¢ Q ¢ Q C C C C C C O o O O O O C 0 U U U r-• U U a 2 2 2 2 • 3 = C N N N N N w, p C C C C C C O Z O O O 0 0 O 0 co rn 0 3 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C w a) c C c c C c F- > cc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >. co C U 'C C ,r O 0 0 . C Cr CO Fi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO FL 0) o C Fa '6 N =' C C O O a� 0 m 0 0 w d co m O 'a O O N N Q o L, T O C - N T— C - m C a) 0) 0) N U co L a) L c m m -- m r 2 a) m m g n co .E .c ami a) o ?i E O N"ifi -C._. 0 0 O d N D °� N >`"0 CO 3 a O N a N ] C _ N N - . d' O 2 `p 0 N co a L .o. _c >. a N .�? N a) O N Q D „ a c U Eo m . 0 -0 m - a' ' a > > 2 , a)m . - o E o E n 0 v N n m U E_ o a E ° p a a v, �. 5 c m a) r a) .T. a) NE o a) '0 0 yF— N C 0 Cl CO o co CO u mQa O 0a o c d 0 3 2 m m m N o 6 E a) o ~ 0 c v) U m D d y � oN � � LNa � — .c co apN � N g .m LEtn � O T m T T - > a) O c co N C "N N L O) m m a) N E '3 y L .— L 0) O L co o >" > .30 o g og o a) -c Lo `o W N _ O a oc oaFoc 0_ D0 .u' � a� "NO � E2 -2 E >.� 3 ao � �a -030 03 aaa N N — E .0 a) lll a0 0 CC )a U ,o N m U N "E .o C L co y .N U O `p N E y U 0 O n. U a) mo U) c m (Dow Q ICON md .oN CO --, 0m0 ;..-, 15 ` n _a. Zm E 3 =p a a) Ol.T m N O C C y N ` p a) 0 N C a 0)t O N C 0 c o E m N m m t0 3 0 0 .Y gyp) o U - � L 0 5 E .. 3 .>. 0 - 0 O o N C N c c C >, — (7),—. 0 -0 •—` m a C C N a E N a C c0 O ` E -00 2 o) m a t _ 0 N O) m G CO U N a 0 N Y a co O C p Q) L o C L a N y ¢ omEEE - o N :NUc � o 5@00) 0- 0.a mp c e c -O '3a) co ma t0 U O d '0 §i a 0)'0 in a:. O o N o O N o O a) C U T 0 0 a) Ell a N > = a am a) d,) 9 > N 0) C a) U 0) 0-.0 U_ 2 a) a) O " O .- c0 �y '>. - O U 2 - 0- U) U) O NU) C7 :N -° >>y `o a�i m ma o 0 a 2 c NN d > > "y d` �- a y s .N LL o 2 ter, I y U c c 0 0 N `0- .0 N E cn I E N N c 00 0 cc L O -O m CO O OL 0 `-- 0 0 O f° c E t U N N E m L N 'c-- o o CD u) -C t 0 '- E • c F- N m •C a N (L m 0 > > U 0 3 a) 0 (/) .0 .0 a) Cp I- H co a) V L+ co m ~ U rnm — a 0 0 cc r. U) (N M V U) co r cci. ,_ a P202 O R w — 0 O C E O O :aU U C 0 O (A Z V' V V V N N U1 CO '0 C o C a) 0 0 a 10 > 0 w C O '.0 L U O ,_ — 2 > Q Q Q Q U 0 • C C c C c C O o O O o O U U U U U U E E E 2 E E w O c c a C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn U 0) 01 0) 0) 0) m C w C a a C C C a E d J' 5 > 5 C S H > 0 0 0 0 _ .. 0 0 O) >. co C U 'C C ,— o,a 0 O C Cr r S• LL 0 0 0 0 Q Q 0 0 CS) d C ao C C 0 C O O a2 re 2 m 0 m 0 m 0 O CO -0 .0 O .0 o n o _o N N T'O _ '0 0 O m 0) p _ `o _ <0 'c C o C N m O a_ L E _ 0 O _ 0 — co c 0 O U c a3 0 0 N C 0 uo) 3 . To- 3 c m � m 0 ° a . Co 2 oc — a 0 E c 3 _c o L L . N '0w E m '� U@ = 3 N _O C O N a in u! C CO E O >, O U U) C U .0.. y g U) CO U U ` -O a d -O C T f6 E U >, C O @ in 0 U U) T a7 T _ o c a _ c in To O) 01 O_ C y a) a) toA > U G O N o C U o 01 E U) a) 07 U) O) a) a) = '0 O a s O d _0 0 a) O a) a) O O 'O a V _ C ,L., o O 5 3 ate) ci ac) O 0 0) 2 j _ E 0) X C T N O C -o C C c0i C 6 0 E U .o E ] Ul C c o a) O C L Y .0 O. 0 a L c m 0 E m ° ° co) .=. a u 0) 0 •C C 0 c0 'O C ` `- 0 co Ol N .0 > = 0 N Q L j C L y U '_ M U a) — N 'u) 0 4..,- z .13 w C f0 '0 C >` a) _ c ` a) U- a) U O a) o c 0 = ._ C d 0 0 0 N a) r w c "0 3 L c c w a) :4-= a 3 C -o = m o U, 0 � m c > mr, — m d o coi : m .m o m a) C c U o m � 5 c _ m E a) m � i E m e m = c .E — Z u) N 0U .O. O_ a,, 0 o co -0 a) -o C p -0 N N W a ) N c C N — C U) 0 O .0 a) C G C O O) 0 . — N '— y0 C ern V) "a >m— 0 O O N .@ _ C a) a) O a) N a (a C O C 'O C O "O 0)@ .0 -O C O C O 2 U 7 U �0 U) E • _ d w a) a) C y a7 a] C C '0 `) C 0 5 0 ,_ N U) a) co a U) N Q o - co C of o C O )0 '� 0 -0 ,., — 0 .p U) 0 E U a) d C N C U N � .? .0 N ` o a a-0) Q ` m N U U co a3 0) co a) a3 O 0 a U) o N 0)• O t0 0) 'C Q ._ c -O E N N C .w U) a) 0 C U C 0 C in (t N d N D N@ c 'C 0 _0I U C J C 3 a) __I CO N C 0)) O W E C -.- C M ECU 0 - m o � -o 2- "0 6 o o2 m m co� 0)) '5 o ME a) m ° DE FY Q5 a) U � Eu) 0 U `o.° � E 3 � 0m .S • • • rnLl' cn— a O• E CO V )f) M ..Jr N P203 w a c E 0 0 :a U C c 03 0 N (n 2 N N N N m 'a C 0 F 0 d (c) ci C O j -0 n) o (-) tF 0 U 2 > U U c c c m m as c a a o_ 0 0 0 0 `o m cw m m a) •E > > > C U 'C C « j p co O 0 a) rL Li m Q m c a rn a) 5 a c C C C o O a2 V7 r W cc 42 0 U 0 O N C a) 'O C O o C a) "O >,-o N '- 0 'O Q 0 O C N a) O O C ' L O- L Y a) .0 C O Uj C N O E w ,O a) U 0 '� O m C U E m -O co 'O a) m y an d m - C m - 2c LO a) 3 � � A)) NNN m )0o x3m a'-_ amt Et cca ur uoi 'o a.o c c c m o 0 c Y .c N a) c C m > m a.- t > > ,c 0 w - c 0 a) O a w-- 0 O 00 U u) O J co p N O c ,ca C 2 a) L m m 0 T N C C +L-. 'O C V) C N �= C O m m o -0 a 3 N cu cM 'E C O m E .0 . -O J) __ c m 2 co -o c m -0 m c c a)ui o 0 o °? m op > c a) .� ? ' d 0 - 3o- m t m 30 cc 0c � � 0 Cf n.mo >.� oo m 0 c m W o a1 0 U p y1 0 > m o a) CO a m m E > � a) r m > m c p mm c ° w " N = C a) C m @ > -O C C T E U-O co O) E m o ,U L. °)'. tea) v � 3 mODC o oa D 6 o - L a) m T'3 m 0 C m U m O N W C n N Z C o O .m O.' N - a) 'O 3 .0 N m a) ai p m >. h a) co E d o r N E Cr m 0 o) 0 E 0 c '� m mm w @ rn m c - as Nm rn � co �oo - ac 3dh _Li o � _0 al c0 m � � m3 ° U4 m Q m aEi m m m '3 .m n c °) n m rn @@ L d m o - m o rn >, Q m c 2 c >.. mu) 0 W N N O E O N •� E = -O N 0 m m N m a = co a) E a) - p)-0 •C = G O m > " Cr) C C C a CO C O. O O C - OU U O m .0 .0 3 N .0 m - L O P 3 O f`0 O. O / .4.-O `O .0 E C C 0 0 N 2a a) moo 'O O) a a m m '7- E • a` TA -.S • • • Ct -o m .5 m co i a` m md2 a) a_) - c a 0 0 .• a v co U o o P204 0 w R O °- . c E O 0 C U U C C 0 V V C V V co Z N N N N N 0 A -c C ED C LC. y - ... ED N > 0 C O 'O co O ,_ L w 2 > a 0 0 a 0 En In N N to C C C C C co a) co co co C a a a a a 0 O '.-+ 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N C• w co 5 co 5 F > K K DC Lt O_ co T M C O . ▪ C " m 0 0 0 0 0 ° Q) O o U U U V U 0) 2 w m m m m m a 0) a) c ao N C C O O CL o D_' w CO CO OOO 0 m 0) c --00C (1) 00) 03= c -00 " = " a) 0 0 E ccE ° 0 wE' c " o t_ 4- � 'm a) .- o co-c c 0, c .c > E ca 0 - o_ a) o t m rn ° a Q o m ~ o .E a c a° o c y u o@ N Y rn m E ° m c m ° ° I- D C )-(1) E u) a) _ O .N U O '° ? N O 'O j c ? ` U a) N C C N - 3 0 C 0 O U n ° N O .5 O) O « E - 'U U '5.-_-_- - V) a) L y u! c (n ° a) Ew0o0r - mn._ ° ma) a) E ° L m a) m5 .0 oa) J w � Laa � co 0m ° ° Enema a� EN � wmo > ° m ° c2noc0 ° � c03 o mc °0oO aO °) c _ °o ° o ° ° 3ac0 a) (>) °- O • ) wE0 acaa)i Lm . ri cinQ — LO @ ca - _ n, Eo > `n aa)i 'm - a) Em 3CO -0 -00 U N C N L.+ in k C a3 .0 L N L N@ L a N C 'C N 0- E�' Q' -_0 N U •.0 'N N a) 3 c and 'y a) m 3 m -0 3 a) L . E '� a) m ° ° 0 0 '- 2 ° °) 0 — E -O 3 a ° � drn� C nN � nc c rn3 a) -o -0 `" 0- E _ 0Q — a t :ca) " � Z o > X E m ° 0 0 ° c ° S c o N N L a c ° o c- - t o a) O V C C m E N E cuc O U 0) O co —a)° > o _ c N a) c a) 0 0 C 0 a3 C a c O)L O_ E -0 " 00- >-..-(0 m a ` O) m a) U 3 a) 0 0 a) d X f0 -o N O U E o N O 0l O o 0 0) (0 .L. s °)t C E m c a O C a) a c ° E N ` . a) a) O (J a) M U 0 3 CO C '- C "0 a n a N C a) c °_ E N a) E al y a) al ° c $ c - a ° E o c c a3 O a) U a) O Q) m O N o C 'c 'O N N O C a) C 3 C) a= T 0 Q y Q O .0 ° y " .c O N o) U c f0 @ C C N L o a) C 3 N a) n co E 'n O) al co 0) p U V) -0 a N N U N C N E C Y `° O ° O)-. >i ° a) CO '° 0 N 'O O U .X a) C I) L O 5C 2E ° � LN _ ooso3 ! cua) a) ° � � 0)2E ..- �)� jou, -13 ,- _0 a Nom n3 C c -o N _3 �• a1 al to a] O) O C 3 'N O -O > W m C c C O N E .N N a) C V) E O n 3 • N E C a) a) C S) a) c C c — as N O N u) O w C U O O - O X O E C C a) m@ 3 O N a) 3 > O a) L a) (0 U ° a) a) O N a) ' E 3 u ur Q .S ° E w E w` E t a) cn E d o a °' w m w a m c 0 U -0 F 12 d 0 0 _, o w m • d rn « 0- E N co c co co c o P205 o A mac. c E O 0 :7 U c c v v • M z N N N N ca -o C a) w y - Y a) m > O C O j a) o 0 L `: 2 > a a o c O U c C co a N C d p_ C° w O O t O O U co C) U N N O •- w c > E > o iiO 0 O o a) U U =Eci_ CI) CO rn d a) c 71 ,15 V C c o O w w m m d ai Eoo o co c £ - La) 3 � me a`� of a) own ., bm (CCtC a CO 7 @ d .-c al a) V' . m 'O `_ ` o N „ N V) L (a C '- 2E � U 0 � ° X NZ -oo ECCm ... gym = c ca) OO , C a) a) O - O c (n O CO fa a) O c c 'O NEa) w E -6) Eam > > CU E ° tC a) c 2a) n N ' mn50Yaa)i a) CO 4C a) O = E7 cO ° cN WI r '-O ccN 3m ... O «O a) 0_ T a) .- d a) - (a C C _ (a yO >O a.`- _C E c W (O L .0) oW w � C'U (aOa V EL � .= E@ a C (0 O = 'Oa a,o,o 0 , C >r O V O a) N U O Cl O) O C]) O Y Z — >4:" CL a3 m cNE � � a) Ca).0 7 - moo O) O .c NU Q) >, � z cE > m SD .O O _ O a) C C N (D a) Q C co CO a) O = N U E o > > ° o dEvin 2, —,3 f6a � Cdaci � m �s°. ° 5 m E 0 • Cl a) - O = d N d > C O N O OI O O C O y .O U U a) C O' Y y ._ 3 Z L C O U co O T L -O L O a3 '� E W C o a) E a) O w a) a) Y ITD oNoE wcac Oc 'm ~ m3 _ m m . °aor � .°: NoDC N •N 0roo • y Q a) E N -O a) .N W O C m O -O a) a) N U O C Z O N O VI L .o ~ 2 a) .o CD 0.)N C >, a7 m 'j O C N d _ E N N a) Cl T N O. O O a m 'O m 07 ` Z YO ` n N N - U 2cin � o3c '_ mo2z'- OU � NO . oQ cOE oCm . m > > 0f2 Y ° d - 3 `a ° •- ca0 oO0Z � � C . .CE _ a, oinNOUEin La c IF " 2 rn L a a) 113 a m u) W Cs N O P206 w R Ti- c E o O U Cl C C C a, O N Z r- v V -a- in WI O C N C r. co a) c0 > D C 0 p 0 To p U t w C, 2 > Q Q a O O O O 0 U O 0 a N 2 2 2 C N U) N N W 0 as C C C O '. co oo 0 00 a) 0 ,c co 0) 0) C C O a c c E co• c o o o H > O 0 0 0 co >. co C O 'C C 0 O a C r C Cr r O • it W U a) 0 0 m m a) a a, c a o C C O O 0.2 0 aa) O O 0 0 iz ° a m m 0 a) m N C 8 O a) • T C N a) . a) C a) a) N N 0 N -0 m N a . o) N a) C c00 •E m C ._ a.N a) L N -L « « o O o a7 N LN L « L O C o '5 S 'a, al, 0 at0 — o ° °c E o g --� v .> d � -cc.) � � �~ aci o uam � Em a) o ° y0o > To o0a) a --`NO - a) ua) a) N a N E C N co _c E N a) m O T N .0 a5 m > 0) m C 0 (0 C X C o C N o N U c �- E N 'm O C 0)0 c 4-2 -0 T to a) 0 a) a) a) . -O C L 2 T o 0 a) O a) a) a)„ V E C 0 .0 N c • w? O 2 Rip > - 3 0 p r „ . m N N .0 4 N = 0 N C "0 ', L p « 'O O -0 a O N E c 'C m ` J ) (0 a) E N N O N C (0 O C L E « 0 1] a7 r N L a a) al N N .0 c a) 2 L « L > N C N p N L > L a3 �. To OI C di N E -O N O V) c 0 'p o >T a 4, • T p v a E N 00 « c O N C 3 'y N C S]N 00 m a N 3 N N c N N a) c)c0 c)(0 m-0o in N ° a O -o N C a) C C C > C E QI c N E O 'O Npc o 'm a) -o vc � m °-c N ° a, - L « - .� Y .a � °- N > � N tea) O C N :O O c « 2 N co 0 c co N N V OL « N - - f0 'O a) - a) U 0-- N N co ` « z °- a) m 0 ,_ = • o � uo m oa� mNcL3dy 1:1)5 EEc 'va) c 'c N C O c 0 0 0 U CO O C T U a) N O).r— N N m U f0 in a a) C a) 0 0 ` 0 0 0 o C N N 0 L N 0 0 `. o C C a) a) .0 0 c U N 3 c --sop p E•co o.0 0_.4 o ° o o � mc o « � m000 � ? 4 N � � NO aOO .E °3E >. Aa N ° omo ` om U YU U E _° `° c a) m v) O > 00a) c N a) 9oTa d Oi N 0) U a) C a ,_ 0 0 > C N N @ 0 0 0 � cma -caui �LSaci wc00 a-a)) � N � E � N ° 2� � � o � 'av o `° EQ'm ?)'-U-o-p O a0f > > . V o@ a) L N o N c E o X o N _c > o E a) m S 0 0 S 9 L o cs - ac) O p o '� o` a`) ▪ Eon 0 n .c .o rn« 3 L. U .0 0 :.-. U a) 0 E N PO CDm c « m as N 0L U a)r `0 o E « a as y p m c ;- a a) 5 E N N M P207 • 3- 01• E O 0 z U u c o N N. N- co Z V O V '7 V N co • 'O C O C a) C r a) co > 0 C o O O o t '- d' C 5 > Q Q Q Q Q C C C C C O O O O O U U U U U 3 2 2 2 2 C V A N 7.5 N 0 C C C C C p r. O O U O O 0) u 0) 0) 01 0) 0) • L- C C C C C 3 3 3 3 3 F > 0 0 0 0 —0 . . _ _ -_ C U r `5 `p 0 y O C C N 0 Cr r O d E a: U U a a a a) CO CO CO a O .C_ ao C :C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 m CO CO m m y a a a a a° 0 N -o m - 'O -O C a) U a) m E m T O) O a) C �) 0 a m a o o m 0 C o_ C C o o o L o ° ° u E c c .c m a) o -Q . C - L °_ CO _ 4- to U m m 'O y 0_`.• C 0 m E T U `O n a) D)L O O L m � m O -O a) m N n to') m = .2 L 0 0 c -O al E o " aa)) E .o E c'� E y 3 E E E � n Ym o rn_c 'o a W E a > m 0- 0 c o m � .E rn m m O N m 0 0 th N 0 O C "- a) 0 O V) -o U v) -O _ m - L > O L N m m > ° o c 01 L O -O C .0 N > o C o) m m 0 (a ID C C L c 0O > > .nmw00 ° E .cF- Em -O a) co � � �v0y cE• = 2coN .Nma U y' N C 3 T.0 d � 'a J -O (O T C — >,E LT U N CD O E ,n Co aQ Y a 0 C C 0 EO N N N N o .0 EO N O C 'UO w n o 'O 0 .a) EMU) . OO .a N W O) m ` T` co O -c - o .c m Y 0 ` m 0 .- .0 o m a) o E -0 s ° o n —° E u .E :o ° T'N m CO 2 a O W O o) c N in W 0 U w m n 0 E .�.e' W O T-0 O a) u) U T m O m 0 0 ZC -o0) mNEoo -00) "(7; 2 '5E00 '6 cEo -0rn D _, cOmo) .? O .Svt � ° �- oai ` 00 ` `)) mc ° Eo � oc � T_ a) NEc . E m -o >, c Dv0- S •-• o « � u '. yQ .T. 'O .0Om , bo , OU -Oay ° a) c ?1_ T.TU Cm -Ow -0 U .L.. -m0 � T0 - mX _ u cE c 2 E rnL U 0 c o) a) c `0- � o o-� cai 0 c E {II rn0 E c o m ° o °) ° o.� a) • «. E o) in a E °)o E _D 0 '- 0 a) a) me too E rn .au c o °) 2% 2 -0 a) oL4. O c O a) o L O 0 v) O` v) -c N N T > o_ .0 EO 'v) UL 'e- >U 7,5 N L m '5 =O -0 > C • E0D 0aH £ a0 -o - m3mEo0c -O .EaUv W > t° Eo -0InoEQ3tca -ovH co)— ▪ o- 2 E v )n cfl m ,_ 0 0 E > P208 w a m y a m .o) n 1 C E O O ir -0 0 U m .o V o ' O c c o C0 O •° `0 m CO Co Z a= '0 d `o `o w o N a) m a) To 0 0 0 U U O N o o O d C O L L .0 C Q O C O 0 3i 3 (0 K K O 0 co > D A (A N CO v u0 to r C w O O II= 'O R m O U d CD 0 a 2 > To N O i) r o_ O C Q a) O C n3 c E m U o p 0 O F: a) E ii- w C Cp) a) a) ,C `y G v Q U_m ______ ___ ___ F > .Ca s c a .r. O O C co 0) I 1 C V 2 Q m o O 'C C �- O a) O C 7 en C c" LL u. O 0) T o c a U 0 00 d 0) 0C) > CO 0 • 0 O t) N i• t a O a 2 c N :C. ) v U O . C C LL Z O N 00_n co co O o n of cc 2 O , o o O = C a C ? a` F- O O c 5 Q m o O w (0 0) a) N c m C N ND V) O m 0) N `o am C c_ O iUO N —Co 0 3 '> ° a)) O • V _ 2 E c c m rn Z N -0 n -oo .m w .N a) C to o CO m y O t N < O o o m -° .o rn 6. 47. < o 0 yU N N 0) p o 0 m c ) N C V d 3 p O 0 rL 7.e co d a E °' .m o) O ) C C 5 0) . 'N E .0 w ` o O o ▪ E r 7 U o O m a s o O7 0) 0 a l O O m a 1 Y a a o , 1 4 , r i P209 'RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232, A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A 4-STORY HOTEL WITH A FLOOR AREA OF 60,989 SQUARE FEET WITH 105 ROOMS ON A VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 91,000 SQUARE FEET(2.08 ACRES) IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK (IP) DISTRICT, WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT(ICOD) LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF PITTSBURGH DRIVE, NEAR THE INTERSECTION WITH MISSION VISTA DRIVE, ABOUT 700 FEET NORTH OF 4TH STREET;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF— APN:0229- 341-11. A. Recitals. 1. Woodbridge Hospitality, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2014-00232 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of April 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 8, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street; and b. The parcel has an area of about 91,000 square feet(2.08 acres)and is about 289 feet(east-west) by about 308 feet(north-south); and c. The parcel is vacant and is dominated by short grasses/shrubs; and d. The project site is bound on the north by a California Highway Patrol(CHP)station. To south and west are hotels (Towne Place Suites by Marriot and Holiday Inn Express). To the east, on the opposite side of Pittsburgh Avenue, is an industrial office building and another hotel (Homewood Suites by Hilton); and ATTACHMENT B • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 P210 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232— WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 2 e. The zoning of the property and all properties to surrounding it is Industrial Park(IP) District. The property and the properties to the east, west, and south are also within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD); and f. The applicant proposes to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms. The hotel will operate as a Fairfield Inn and Suites by Marriot; and g. The parking requirement for hotels is one parking stall per unit/room and two parking stalls for the manager/employees. The required parking for the proposed hotel is 107 parking stalls; 108 parking stalls will be provided; and h. The proposed hotel has a floor area of 60,989 square feet. As the area of the project site is about 91,000 square feet(2.08 acres), the building will have a floor area ratio(FAR)of 67 percent(60,989/91,000 = 0.67). As the FAR of the proposed hotel exceeds the maximum FAR of 0.60 (60 percent) that is permitted in the Industrial Park (IP) District per Figure LU-2 of the General Plan and Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 are being presented to the Planning Commission in conjunction with the subject application in order to establish a higher maximum FAR that will be specific to hotels and motels. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan(subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877), the objectives of the Development Code (subject to the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879), and the purposes of the Zoning District in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet and 105 rooms. The underlying General Plan designation is Industrial Park. b. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties to surrounding it is Industrial Park (IP) District. The property and the properties to the east, west, and south are also within the Industrial Commercial Overlay District(ICOD); c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, except maximum Floor Area Ratio,for which a Development Code Amendment (related file: DRC2014-00567)is being presented in order to allow the floor area ratio to be greater than 0.60 (60 percent). The proposed development otherwise complies with all other standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City including building and parking setbacks, building height,average landscape depth, parking, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 P211 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 3 Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings and prior to the approving Development Review DRC2014-00232, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. - c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval of Development Review DRC2014-00232 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 and their adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein for all project components. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 P212 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 4 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 P213 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 5 • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM10)emissions, in • accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 11) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 12) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 13) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 14) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 15) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 16) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 17) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. P214 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 6 Biological 1) A preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted three (3) days prior to the commencement of vegetation removal, soil disturbance, grading, and/or construction on the project site. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)protocols.The temporary"no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all • nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • , Pursue educating the public approximately the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. . 2) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh (Kit'c) Nation to discuss monitoring of the project to ensure that prehistoric archaeological resources that may be encountered during grading are protected or preserved for study. The applicant shall submit the results of this consultation to the City prior to issuance of permits for grading of the site. 1 ( PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 P215 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232—WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 7 3) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring.is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and-notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM•0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 P216 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 — WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil- stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. P217 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 9 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. • 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about _ _ recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. f t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 P218 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 — WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 10 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by RMA-Riverside, Inc.October 6, 2014 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities: 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 P219 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 —WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 11 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050,as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) Stationary construction noise sources such as generators or pumps must be located at least 100 feet from sensitive land uses, as feasible, or at maximum distance when necessary to complete work near sensitive land uses. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 6) Construction staging areas must be located as far from noise sensitive land uses as feasible. This mitigation measure must be implemented throughout construction and may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development,or designee during routine inspections. 7) Throughout construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with included noise attenuating devices and are properly maintained. This mitigation measure shall be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 8) Idling equipment must be turned off when not in use. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 9) Equipment must be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. This mitigation measure may be periodically monitored by the Director of Community and Economic Development, or designee during routine inspections. 10) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent r , P220 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-27 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00232 –WOODBRIDGE HOSPITALITY, INC. April 8, 2015 Page 12 feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:" 7 .,„,_ \�_J Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: 0 ` k' — Candyc c urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE F t P221 Conditions of Approval »,; Revcar0 Ccr.AnfovCA Community Development Department Project #: 0RC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: - 022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 6. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 7. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 8. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan www.CayofRC.us I24I2015 ilyofRC.us P222 Project#: DRC2014-00232 CEOA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: - 022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review. Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 10. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 11. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 12. AU site, . grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 13. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 14. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 15. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 16. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 17. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 18. Signs shall be conveniently posted for"no overnight parking" and for"employee parking only." www.CityofRC.us Printed'.3124/2015 Page 2 of 11 P223 Project #: DRC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: - 022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 19. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 20. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 21. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 22. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 23. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 24. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2015 Page 3 01 11 P224 Project #: DRC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: -022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 27. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 28. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. 29. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within • the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 30. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape—architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. • 31. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 32. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 33. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 34. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 35. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 36. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 37. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. Printed:7124/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 11 Project#: DRC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 P225 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: - 022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 38. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 39. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 40. Approval is for the construction of a 4-story hotel with a floor area of 60,989 square feet with 105 rooms on a vacant parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District, Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD) located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street;APN: 0229-341-11. 41. Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 42. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations not within direct view or line-of-sight of the office corner of the building. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) are to be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the building. 43. The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base, measured from the finished surface is 25 feet. 44. Approval of this application is contingent on the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879. 45. All ground-mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. 46. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color. 47. Decorative paving shall be provided at each vehicle entrance to the site, behind the public right-of-way. These decoratively paved areas shall extend from the front property line to the setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. Printed:344/2015 www.CityofRC.us ' Page 5 of 11 P226 Project #: 0RC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: - 022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 1. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 2. Pittsburgh Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Industrial Collector" standards as required and including: a. Protect or provide curb and gutter, sidewalk and street lights, as required. b. Proposed driveway approach shall conform to Std. Dwg. 101, Type C. c. Provide curbside drain outlet per City Standards. d. Protect existing R26(s) signs along Pittsburgh Avenue e. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. 3. The sidewalk shall wrap at the back of the proposed drive approach and shall cross the drive approach at the zero curb face. 4. Street improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Alternatively, revisions can be made to existing street improvement plans Drawing Numbers 769 and 1337 respectively, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Site is located within Assessment District 82-1 and therefore exempt from payment of drainage fees. 6. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 7. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Pittsburgh Avenue Sidewalk Drive Approach www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24,2015 Page 6 of 11 r i Project#: DRC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 P227 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: - 022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: • B. Engineering Services Department S. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 9. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 10. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 11. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 12. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Printed'3124,2015 www.City01RC.U5 Page 7 of 11 P228 Project #: DRC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: -022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 13. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 14. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 15. Prior to the issuance of •Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application- is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/2412015 Page 8 of 11 • • i I Project #: 0RC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 • P229 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: -022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 12. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 17. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 18. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:724 12015 www.CifyofRC.us Page 9 of 11 j s P230 Project #: 0RC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: -022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 19. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 20. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer, of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 21. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 22. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 23. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 24. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Pittsburgh Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 25. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 26. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 27. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). swr Printed.3/20/2015 e.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 11 Project #: DRC2014-00232 CEQA2014-00017, PMT2015-00619 • P231 Project Name: 105 ROOM HOTEL///W/S PITTSBURGH + MISSION VISTA Location: -022934111-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Commercial New Construction ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 28. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 29. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 30. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The and owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed:3124/2015 wvw.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 11 • P232 RESOLUTION NO. 15-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO PROVIDE A FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) OF 1.0 FOR HOTELS AND MOTELS IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT IN ORDER TO ALLOW MORE FLEXIBILITY IN THE SIZE OF THESE TYPES OF USES/DEVELOPMENTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of April 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that.date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing April 8, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the Industrial Park (IP) District. The Industrial Park (IP) District is generally located between Foothill Boulevard, Rochester Avenue/Interstate 15, Hermosa Avenue, and 4th Street; and b. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) permitted in the Industrial Park (IP) District is currently 0.60 (60 percent); and c. Per Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, hotels and motels are permitted (or conditionally permitted) in six (6) development districts in the City: Mixed Use (MU), Office Professional (OP), General Commercial (GC), Regional Related Commercial (RRC), Commercial Office (CO), and Industrial Park (IP); and d. The majority of the hotels and motels in the City are in the Industrial Park (IP) District; e. In order to ensure that opportunities for the development of hotels and motels are • maximized in the Industrial Park (IP) District, and make the floor area ratio requirements that apply to them consistent with some of the other Development Districts, it is proposed that the Development ATTACHMENT C P233 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-26 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 8, 2015 Page 2 Code be amended in conjunction with General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877, so that hotels and motels will be subject to a maximum floor area ratio of 1.0 (100 percent); and f. The Section of the Code that will be amended is Table 17.36.040-1 and will read as shown in Exhibit 0 of the Staff Report and in Attachment A of this resolution; and g. This amendment will apply to hotels and motels only, and only within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and h. The amendment will not change any of the technical standards (building setbacks, building height, parking requirements, landscape coverage, etc.), design standards (architecture, site design, etc.), allowable land uses, and/or performance standards (noise, odors, hazardous materials, etc.) that currently apply within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and i. The performance standards that apply to the Industrial Park (IP) District are the most restrictive of the performance standards that apply to the industrial district; and j. The proposed amendment will apply to all parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and k. This request is in response to a proposed hotel of about 60,989 square feet on a parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street -APN: 0229-341-11; and I. This Development Code Amendment is in conjunction with General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877 and, therefore, will conform to and not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Development Code Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. Increasing the maximum FAR is consistent with the land use designation of Industrial Park as hotels and motels are permitted within that land use designation. Increasing the maximum FAR will encourage commercial services that meet community needs, and encourage new development projects to build on vacant in-fill sites within a built-out area; and b. The proposed Development Code Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The amendment will not change any of the technical standards (building setbacks, building height, parking requirements, landscape coverage, etc.), design standards (architecture, site design, etc.), allowable land uses, and/or performance standards (noise, odors, hazardous materials, etc.) that currently apply to the subject properties; and c. The proposed Development Code Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan (as amended through General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00877). � r P234 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-26 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 8, 2015 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. • d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 as shown in Attachment A incorporated herein. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA f , P235 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-26 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 8, 2015 Page 4 BY: ' , Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: 'u✓ Candyce rnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of April 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ , OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 1 P236 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.36 C. Industrial Site Development Standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in Article IV (Site Development Provisions) that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District IP GI MI/HI HI Lot Area (minimum)1'I 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 2 ac 5 ac Lot Width (minimum)(3) 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Setback (minimum distance between structure and property line in feet) (4) Front Yard See Table 17.36.040-2 Side Yard 5ft(5) 5ft(5) 5ft 151 5ft(5) Street Side Yard (and rear yard abutting street) See Table 17.36.040-2 Rear Yard 0ft 151 0ft(5) 0ft 151 0ft151 Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings Accessory Buildings Must meet current Building Code requirements Building Height(maximum in feet) Primary Buildings 35 ft at the front setback(6). Maximum height is 75 feet 1'I. add "(8)" Accessory Buildings 14 ft 18 ft 1824 ft Floor Area Ratio (maximum ratio of building to lot square footage Floor Area Ratio 40-60%(9) 50-60% n/a 40-50% Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Open Space/Landscape Area 15% 10% 1 Soa/o�1/ 10%(2)/5% Other Performance Standards (see Chapter 17.66) A B C/B (2) C Table Notes: (1) Condominium Lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved Master Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements, (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area; 10%minimum landscape area;and the "B"level Performance Standards(Chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minim um required under the City's currently adopted Building Code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings exceeding 35 feet high shall be set back an additional 1 ft.from the front setback for each 1 ft. of height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. Add Table Note c$ here (see below) D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. N -'18) For Hotels and Motels. the maximum floor area ratio is 0 n00 percent) Pc /7ero, Ls= a6 Attachment A 17.36-19 P237 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article Ill, Chapter 17.36 C. Industrial Site Development Standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in Article IV (Site Development Provisions) that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District IP GI MI/HI HI 5 ac or Lot Area (minimum)(') 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 2 ac(2) 5 ac Lot Width (minimum)(3) 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Setback (minimum distance between structure and property line in feet)(4) Front Yard See Table 17.36.040-2 Side Yard 5 ft(5) 5 ft 151 5 ft(5) 5 ft 151 Street Side Yard (and rear yard abutting street) See Table 17.36.040-2 Rear Yard 0 ft(5) 0 ft(5) 0 ft 151 0 ft(5) Distance Between Buildings _ Primary Buildings Must meet current Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Building Height(maximum in feet) Primary Buildings 35 ft at the front setback(6). Maximum height is• 75 feet . Acc-s • :u'I.i • _ i f 18 t 1: t 24 t Floor Area Ratio (maximum ratio of building to lot square footage) Floor Area Ratio 140-60% I 50-60% I n/a I 40-50% • • -n .. e - -q i -m° t t i . -r - "a• . oi -ns. :c• • • p. c• o • .1- 10 0/0(2)/ Open Space/Landscape Area 15% 10% 5% 10%(2)/5% Other Performance Standards (see Chapter 17.66) A B C/B(2) • C Table Notes: (1) Condominium Lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved Master Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area; 10%minimum landscape area;and the "8"level Performance Standards(Chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minim um required under the City's currently adopted Building Code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings exceeding 35 feet high shall be set back an additional 1 ft.from the front setback for each 1 ft.of height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. • 17.36-19 ATTACHMENT D P238 • Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article Ill, Chapter 17.36 C. Industrial Site Development Standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in Article IV (Site Development Provisions) that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District IP GI MI/HI HI Lot Area (minimum)(1) 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 2 ac(2j 5 ac Lot Width (minimum)(3) 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Setback (minimum distance between structure and property line in feet)(4) Front Yard See Table 17.36.040-2 • Side Yard 5ft151 5ft151 5ft151 5ft(5) Street Side Yard (and rear yard abutting street) See Table 17.36.040-2 Rear Yard 0ft151 0ft151 0ft(5) 0ft151 Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings Must meet current Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Building Height(maximum in feet) 35 ft at the front setback 161. Maximum height is Primary Buildings 75 feet(7). Add (8)" Accessory Buildings 14 ft 18 ft 18 f 24 ft Floor Area Ratio (maximum ratio of building to lot square footage Floor Area Ratio 40-60%(9) SU-60% n/a 40-50% Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Open Space/Landscape Area 15% 10% 105%21/ 10%(2)/5% Other Performance Standards(see Chapter 17.66) A B I C/B(2) C Table Notes: (1) Condominium Lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved Master Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area; 10%minimum landscape area;and the "B"level Performance Standards(Chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minim um required under the City's currently adopted Budding Code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings exceeding 35 feet high shall be set back an additional 1 ft.from the front setback for each 1 ft, of height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. \> Add Table Note #8 here (see below) D. Other Mi scellaneous Industrial Development Standards. (8) For Hotels and Motels, the maximum floor area ratio is 1.0 (100 percent) 17.36-19 ATTACHMENT E rIOI ; / zI 1N3WH3Vl1V 2 , m 3 a Baker Ave to D w ? m m N \ - N m = a Z CD m •••"*"....' a m `< N N 5 soil _ 0.' ra A 0 Archibald Ave I M.o am m ■ 1 z a g 3 52 T. to a Hermosa Ave r I. M p- I, I fin Haven Ave _ E --- =. A) „„ol_____„. L____ c ( . '13 Z S a (4) :, 0. ■ v Milliken Ave (I i. U) ..1�.It� "' — :in s 0 ■111111141# ` - SilisFI —.\. Rochester Ave {Till_ ai it rlft-- ';‘-'4*NN''' ' \----- 6EZd L I 1 P240 ORDINANCE NO. 874 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO PROVIDE A FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) OF 1.0 FOR HOTELS AND MOTELS (ONLY) IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT IN ORDER TO ALLOW MORE FLEXIBILITY IN THE SIZE OF THESE TYPES OF USES/DEVELOPMENTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On April 8, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 15-26, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Development Code Amendment. 2. On June 3, 2015, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the Development Code Amendment and concluded the hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 3, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the Industrial Park (IP) District. The Industrial Park (IP) District is generally located between Foothill Boulevard, Rochester Avenue/Interstate 15, Hermosa Avenue, and 4th Street; and b. The maximum floor area ratio (FAR) permitted in the Industrial Park (IP) District is currently 0.60 (60 percent); and c. Per Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, hotels and motels are permitted (or conditionally permitted) in six (6) development districts in the City: Mixed Use (MU), Office Professional (OP), General Commercial (GC), Regional Related Commercial (RRC), Commercial Office (CO), and Industrial Park (IP); and d. The majority of the hotels and motels in the City are in the Industrial Park (IP) District; and e. In order to ensure that opportunities for the development of hotels and motels are maximized in the Industrial Park (IP) District, and make the floor area ratio requirements that P241 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 874 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 3, 2015 Page 2 • apply to them are consistent with some of the other Development Districts, it is proposed that the Development Code be amended in conjunction with General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00877, so that hotels and motels will be subject to a maximum floor area ratio of 1.0 (100 percent); and f. The Section of the Code that will be amended is Table 17.36.040-1 and will read as shown in Exhibit 0 of the Staff Report and in Attachment A of this resolution; and g. This amendment will apply to hotels and motels only, and only within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and h. The amendment will not change any of the technical standards (building setbacks, building height, parking requirements, landscape coverage, etc.), design standards (architecture, site design, etc.), allowable land uses, and/or performance standards (noise, odors, hazardous materials, etc.) that currently apply within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and i. The performance standards that apply to the Industrial Park (IP) District-are the most restrictive of the performance standards that apply to the industrial district; and j. The proposed amendment will apply to all parcels within the Industrial Park (IP) District; and k. This request is in response to a proposed hotel of about 60,989 square feet on a parcel of about 91,000 square feet (2.08 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District located on the west side of Pittsburgh Drive, near the intersection with Mission Vista Drive, about 700 feet north of 4th Street - APN: 0229-341-11; and I. The General Plan is being amended (Related file: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00455) to correct, for example, inconsistencies between land use designations including the floor area ratio (FAR) that applies to hotels and motels. This General Plan Amendment was reviewed and approved by the City Council on May 20, 2015. The subject Development Code Amendment will conform to and not conflict with the General Plan, as amended, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Development Code Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and b. The proposed Development Code Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The proposed Development Code Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. • P242 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 874 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 3, 2015 Page 3 SECTION 4: Table 17.30.030-1 entitled "Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District" is hereby deleted and replaced by Table 17.30.030-1 amended in words and figures as shown in Attachment A of this Ordinance. SECTION 5: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program as shown in the staff report, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment 'and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 6: Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, the City Council adopts Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00879 as identified in this Ordinance and as shown as Attachment A. P243 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 874 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00879 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUNE 3, 2015 Page 4 SECTION 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • P244 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.36 C. Industrial Site Development Standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in Article IV (Site Development Provisions) that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning District IP GI MI/HI HI Lot Area minimum 1" 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 5 ac or 5 ac ( ) 2ac(2) Lot Width (minimum)i3' 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Setback(minimum distance between structure and property line in feet) (4) Front Yard See Table 17.36.040-2 Side Yard 5ft151 5fti5' 5ftis' 5ft151 Street Side Yard (and rear yard abutting street) See Table 17.36.040-2 Rear Yard 0fti5' 0ft151 0fti5, I 0ft(5 Distance Between Buildings Primary Buildings Must meet current Building Code requirements Accessory Buildings Building Height(maximum in feet) 35 ft at the front setback'6). Maximum height is Primary Buildings 75 feet ''. Add (8) Accessory Buildings 14 ft 18 ft 18 f 24 ft Floor Area Ratio (maximum ratio of building to lot square footage Floor Area Ratio 40-60%(4) 60% n/a F-40-50% Open Space Requirement (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Open Space/Landscape Area 15% 10% 1 5%0%21/ 10%12115% Other Performance Standards(see Chapter 17.66) A B CB 12' C Table Notes: (1) Condominium Lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved Master Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1.000 feet of Arrow Route'minimum 2-acre lot area. 10%minimum landscape area:and the 'B' level Performance Standards(Chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minim urn required under the City s currently adopted Building Code (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line. (5) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings exceeding 35 feet high shall be set back an additional 1 ft. from the front setback for each 1 ft. of height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit. > Add Table Note #8 here (see below) D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. (8) For Hotels and Motels, the maximum floor area ratio is 1.0 (100 percent) 17.36-19 ATTACHMENT A e nZ onsiratr , a, ,t, Ti 0 X co 0 szo I -- '- / a) rf , (D r O - C7 = cD O C L n i V _. ^ r+ O O (D CD a o Q ° N C I O * CCD O a C) - r+ 3 WI = r ,_..F CD i� �' O O CD r+ ;i � en ¢) SD I CD 0 ,<•-i- ° pj Si m W n N o o -L o m o a f m ^ 0o— oc° -r * E 3m 70 O N O O / o f`' Q 3 c011 0 O O O ci) O 7 CI CO O O °� CD • O@ O CD O 0) ,c°n w ° ° rn o 3 ° c FIT D rn� CI) 0 C CD O cn CD ,+ O 0 rD a) g, O ° F)) CO 7 R a a //' O Q * a) - r !. O O C (0 `-' 5' -n CD Q 7 N 4O CD E ro Ocn rn 0 -1 rn O ( W a (D @ fD < osr4 fa) 2) ° m . ' N o Q ° cfl v �� � � ° � � � � 3 0 CR C)-. O 00 `z o" CD O 3 -' ,, �n f1 O_ Q Q (n Uj Et -n -�, ° � � Oao� NO SD ° , o O o -1 2 cn 0 0 � cn � � o 0 0 xi— -v \ oE � � rn 6io- o D 0 , ro O n. o Go CD D ° cD n7 (D w X. x _+ Xaoo � -o CD0cn 0 m. o O —. CO O o N a) CD CO r \ CD < O '="` (D xa 03 a V) Li) N o / fl) CD —'' 0 O Q rr r (D 0 - O r. , < CD o O n cn� oo co (76 � � � o c VI DJ / 0 Cu Q N CD = n rn -� �- cn n p / p 0 D 0 3- L 0 fD -0 rD \ s (� a) p) ri- Ns, 0 � � e (nom r N) -4, ° q v s. �; � N Z7 Q- Q 0 CD 0 cQ pN• gar. • • • iiT .1 Pv = we. ist / 0 � � � � � `� a -% � � CD X Q x CD .. a a, c =� 9 0 ea 3 O. m m 3 3 o m 5 DJ a -CD .-. CD co -0 C �- o (D 2) Q a DO om ow 3 CD a- O O l Q. ! r+ ; * Cu cn CD o DJ �� * 0) al = = ,--�. �' O Imo r+ a) - m m a O cn. "7 Vc7"/ �� alb • • • � m 0 al m X ° m o—. � cu u oc, 0 3oD m - < w• -0 c C (D• m N pa Cp C 3 Do = = o �• m 3 5 '> a DJ m m n M a m m C -0 = m o n 7-1. -a . a o Cl) t -05' aW ° Q) om S 11 Q �, � — 3R Q 0 -0 5 Q {; o - — (D i a o CL +j 0 �• Cn r 3 G r o o r M m 0 3 = CD (Q ,--r J ea Sv O a a < o w ;a --. I OD r- m. co m a Baker Ave ,,. D • m §. Std- cn i E 7 II g. - • Q m ' z m 9, K C N v 0 nN W 3 .1 / O 0 m13 4 -� w+ s�0� -' 0 - co Archibald Ave - Ma co o .■ = a S eo N A O to •"f n CD Hermosa Ave _ 16 Iiiii= Haven Ave t Aof ma Wall m 0) N N ; /\ A 3 K !Ii M W Y a v Milliken Ave __ j r--- y �-�!_! __,, 11 Li a \ ell rig• It LIL •i --„. 4,3 „ _,.._ . Rochester Ave 74 '-'k'*4- 4,.)„, n Witt o 2 '-e CD m —I r * CO ii 0 5. ,' cp = — CDD CD 1 c�= �, CD C7 S Cl) , k< r CD O O O CD -0 g CD r CD CD CD = CD 5- r CO Ca �--f Q Q Q Cl) CD - cn �- 1 1 + _ o QUO = CD -0 N m D CD i�' � n Sv CD Q 6rF O 1/4,Z Ai c ,� a f . w O ems• \V f t` Afra Ina C;icz, Er- ih,,,u: , 2 z es ipt / Z CD W � o H I �• co o CD -, • 3 CD < CD _ `C N CD n n O _ '' ea a) D � 3 ' � o Cl) au we it i co I CDo % C D Cl) 1 it _ - CD CD O Q j I = -OJ,. D Q �ymy4 41,.0 r° 1 reA • • • • � ' CAD O H p Q I-�- CD 0-0 3 O CD a) Q= CD w a) O CD U) CD n -% - CD Q 0 4 co 0 CD mg Q co - CD i n O CD N Uli • CD O . . CCDD n — 0 l Q ^F CA CT -. O a) i `G CD r CD r+ 1G Cr P a) = 0 C) `i ti = * = L, CD CD CCD a) CA fA 0 * CO = _ #? co r = CD _. ,{ x ' ; O a) CD }, e F er v i• ii 'aft o o 00 -0 9 0 @ Swot , N w = n to O Z o :� Oo O v to co o m C) O M N U _ j Ch o N O n o co I D 0_ 3 CD o , €F P245 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT %100 DATE: June 3, 2015 RANCHO TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tom Grahn, Acting Senior Planner SUBJECT:CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00546 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential for 2.25 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00547 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC - A request to amend the Zoning Map from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to establish a Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) for 2.25 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00546, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2014-00610 - 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC — A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 7418 Archibald, LLC, for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD), including deviating from certain development standards, for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208- 031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: • Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and • Adopt the attached Resolution approving General Plan Map Amendment DRC2014-00546, and attached Ordinances adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, and Development Agreement DRC2014-00610. • P246 CITY COUNCIL DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, AND DRC2014-00610 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 2 BACKGROUND: On May 13, 2015, the Planning Commission considered the following applications: • General Plan Map Amendment DRC2014-00546 -A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential; and • Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 - A request to amend the Zoning Map from Low (L) Residential District (2-4 du/ac) to High (H) Residential District (24-30 du/ac) and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH); and • Development Agreement DRC2014-00610 - A request for a Development Agreement for the purpose of providing a senior housing project; and • Design Review DRC2014-00545—A request to develop a 24,621 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land; and • Minor Exception DRC2014-00713 — A request to increase the wall height up to 8 feet along the west and south property line; and • Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-275 —A request to remove 14 trees on-site, 3 of which are heritage trees. The Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the General Plan Map Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Development Agreement applications, and approved the Design Review, Minor Exception, and Tree Removal Permit applications contingent on the City Council's approval of the related applications. These applications were initiated by 7418 Archibald, LLC, to provide the appropriate General Plan land use designation and Zoning Map land use district for the development of a 3-story, 60-unit senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and south of Base Line Road. Adoption of the General Plan Amendment, along with the associated Zoning Map Amendment will provide the required development regulations for a senior housing project within a High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH). The Planning Commission concluded its public hearing on May 13, 2015 and adopted the above listed recommendations. No comments were provided by the Planning Commission or the public regarding the proposed applications. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission Staff Report of May 13, 2015, regarding analysis of the proposed applications. Environmental Assessment: •Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, . geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. P247 CITY COUNCIL DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, AND DRC2014-00610 - 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot plus radius of the project site. Staff has not received any comments regarding the proposed project. Respectfully s bmittedd, 7-, i — V Candyce B rnett Planning Director CB:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report with exhibits dated May 13, 2015 Resolution Approving General Plan Map Amendment DRC2014-00546 Ordinance Adopting Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 Ordinance Adopting Development Agreement DRC2014-00610 • • P248 STAFF REPORT I _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT I R_ DATE: May 13, 2015 ""RAANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tom Grahn, Acting Senior Planner SUBJECT:ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00546 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential for 2.25 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014- 00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00547 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC -A request to amend the Zoning Map from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to establish a Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) for 2.25 acres of land, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2014- 00610 - 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC —A request for a Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and 7148 Archibald, LLC, for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD), including deviating from certain development standards, for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 - 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC -A request to develop a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land in the High (H) Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59: . Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00713 - 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC - A request to increase the height of a combination retaining and garden wall height from 6 feet to 8 feet, along the west and south property line of a proposed 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land in the High (H) Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014- 00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- P249 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2014-00545, DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2014-00610, DRC2014-00713, AND DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 2 00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015- 00275. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2015-00275 - 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC - A request to remove 14 trees, including 3 heritage trees, for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land in the High (H) Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014-00545, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00713. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and • Adopt the attached Resolutions recommending that the-City Council approve General Plan Map Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, and Development Agreement DRC2014-00610; and • Adopt the attached ResolutiOns approving Design Review DRC2014-00545, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275 contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Development Agreement. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Villa Pacifica Senior Apartments; High (H) Residential District / Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), and Archibald Library; Office Professional (OP) District South - First Baptist Church and vacant; Low (L) Residential District East - Single Family Residential; Low (L) Residential District West - Single Family Residential; Low (L) Residential District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - High Residential and Office South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The 2.25 acre project site contains three buildings—a residence, a garage, and a small concrete block structure as well as two clusters of Queen Palm trees, miscellaneous mature landscaping, and a variety of citrus trees. The property to the north contains the Archibald Library and the existing Villa Pacifica senior apartments, the property to the south contains the First Baptist Church, and the property to the east and west contains single-family homes. P250 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2014-00545, DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2014-00610, DRC2014-00713, AND DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 3 D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Number of Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Units Ratio Required Provided Senior Apartments 60 0.7 spaces per 42 60 unit See additional discussion regarding parking in Section D with respect to the Development Agreement and the Senior Housing Overlay District. ANALYSIS: • A. Background: On November 11, 1995, the Planning Commission approved Development Review DR 95-22 for the Villa Pacifica senior apartment complex, which provided for the development of a 158-unit, three-story, senior housing project in the High (H) Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOD), located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue. A related Development Agreement (DA 95-01) was approved by the City Council on December 20, 1995. Villa Pacifica was subsequently developed in the late 1990's and is located directly north of and adjacent to the proposed project site (Exhibit A). B. Development Review DRC2014-00545: The application proposes the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex known as "Villa Pacifica II." The 60- apartment units will include 48 one bedroom units (693 square feet each) and 12 two bedroom units (945 square feet each). Each residential unit is a fully functioning apartment, with complete living facilities. Centralized washer and dryer facilities are located on each floor of the complex. Elevator access is provided to the second and third floors. The lobby, administrative office, and 1,300 square foot community room are centrally located on the first floor(Exhibit E). Sixty parking spaces are provided for the complex at a ratio of 1 non-covered parking space for each apartment unit (Exhibit B). The project was designed to comply with all Development Code development standards including building setbacks, building height, parking, circulation, recreation, and landscape standards. The design of the project is a contemporary architectural style, yet still architecturally compatible with the design of the existing Villa Pacifica complex to the north. The proposed architectural design provides similar building massing and architectural features (i.e., stucco exterior, tile roof, balconies, etc.) as the existing Villa Pacifica; however, the architecture was revised to include a revised color scheme, additional accent material including a stacked stone wainscot and architectural reveals that break up large expanses of stucco (Exhibit G). Vehicle and pedestrian circulation for the complex was designed to physically connect with the existing Villa Pacifica complex. The perimeter wall along the south boundary of the Villa Pacifica site will be removed to maintain a visual connection between the two projects. A driveway and sidewalk connection will be provided at the northwest corner of the project site providing a direct link between Villa Pacifica and Villa Pacifica II; due to grade differences between the two adjacent projects additional sidewalk connections were not possible (Exhibit H). P251 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2014-00545, DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2014-00610, DRC2014-00713, AND DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 4 Requirements for recreation amenities are addressed in Development Code Section • 17.36.010(E), which requires a total of four (4) amenities for the project. On-site amenities include 2 barbecue pavilions, a community garden area with 10 garden plots on the east side of the building, outdoor fitness stations on the west side of the building, as well as a 1/5th mile fitness loop (Exhibit I). Combination garden and retaining walls up to 8 feet in height, measured from the mid-point of the retaining wall to the top of the garden wall will be installed along the west and south property line (Exhibit H). Because of the proximity of the site to the adjacent church to the south, staff encouraged the applicant to provide a shared driveway approach between the two properties (Exhibits B and C). Two alternatives to the shared driveway were proposed; a shared driveway with the entire driveway located on the project site (Exhibit B), and a shared driveway with the driveway centered over the shared property line (Exhibit C). Exhibit C is the preferred (and negotiated) alternative as it provides for a larger landscaped open space between the complex and the Archibald Avenue right-of-way. Although most plans in the applicant's submittal reflect the design shown in Exhibit B, the site will be developed as provided in Exhibit C, and the existing northerly driveway accessing the church property will be removed and a shared driveway will be installed. A copy of the easement agreement between the church and the developer has been provided as Exhibit K. C. General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00547: The requests propose to change the General Plan land use designation and Zoning Map land use district from Low (L) Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to High (H) Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) for the entire 2.25 acre project site. The applicant is also requesting a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) be applied to permit the development of a 60-unit senior housing apartment complex. Development Code standards establish that project areas less than 3.0 acres in size are limited to the low end of the density range. In the High Residential zone, 2.25 acres would permit a total of 54 multiple family units. With a density bonus (up to 25 percent) that can be authorized with a SHOD, the unit count could be as high as 67 units. The application proposes the development of a 60-unit apartment complex at a density of 26.6 dwelling units per acre. Existing Land Use Designations: The project site is currently located within the Low (L) Residential General Plan land use designation and Zoning Map land use district. Under the existing Low (L) Residential component, the 2.25 acre project site could support the development of 4 to 9 single family homes, but the ultimate number of homes would be limited by the need to install right-of-way improvements. The current designation does not permit the development of multiple family units on the project site. Appropriateness of Proposed Land Use Designations: The project site is proposed to be located within the High (H) Residential General Plan land use designation and Zoning Map land use district. These designations will be consistent with the existing High (H) Residential and Office General Plan land use designations to the north and complementary to the existing Low (L) Residential General Plan land use designations to the south, east, and west. The proposed High (H) Residential district is complementary to the existing adjacent Low (L) Residential district as both land uses permit residential development, one more intensive than the other, and thereby functioning as a buffer between the lower density residential land uses to the south and the higher intensity office uses to the north. In the proposed High (H) Residential zone, the P252 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2014-00545, DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2014-00610, DRC2014-00713, AND DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 5 2.25 acre project site could support the development of 54 multiple family dwelling units. Because the site is under 3.0 acres in size development would be restricted to the low end of the land use density range at 24 units per acre, without a density bonus. In addition, a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) is also proposed to facilitate the construction of affordable senior rental housing units. A SHOD may be applied in combination with a residential district. D. Development Agreement DRC2014-00610 and Senior Housing Overlay District: In accordance with the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), the applicant has requested the approval of Development Agreement (Attachment A to the Draft Development Agreement Resolution for DRC2014-00610). The proposed agreement locks in the rental rates, tenant qualification criteria, and the term of affordability and describe development incentives being applied to the project. The following table shows how the project is qualified to take advantage of specific development incentives: SHOD Requirements Proposed Project Target Population 55 years or older 62 years or older Income Individual or couple with an annual All units will comply; in addition, at Restrictions/Rental income below 80% of the median least 6 will be for Extremely Low Rates income for persons or families within Income tenants; at least 12 units San Bernardino County as defined by will be for Low Income tenants HUD (40% of median); and at least 11 units will be for Very Low Income tenants. Qualifications Appropriate zoning; "High" residential zoning allows for Compatible living environment (quiet senior apartments; area); The area is generally quiet with no Adequate infrastructure (streets, unusual uses; • sidewalks, traffic/pedestrian signals); The site is adjacent to fully Level topography; and, developed arterial streets with Proximity to shopping, services, adequate pedestrian facilities; transit, and open space. The site is generally flat and a number of accessible walkways • will be provided; The site is within walking distance of various services at the intersection of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue, directly north of the proposed project site. The nearest park, Lions Park at 9161 Base Line Road, is located approximately 1/2 mile from the project site. Term of Affordability 30 years 55 years Development Code Section 17.38.010(F) provides for the consideration of specific Development Incentives in order to reduce the development costs associated with the construction of housing oriented toward senior citizens of low and moderate income. The proposed incentives are discussed below: P253 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2014-00545, DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2014-00610, DRC2014-00713, AND DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 6 1. Reduction in On-Site Parking. For typical multiple-family residential developments, the Development Code would require 1.5 parking spaces for each 1 bedroom unit, plus 2 parking spaces for each 2 bedroom unit, plus 1 visitor parking space for each 3 units. Additionally, for each unit type 1, required parking space must be in a garage or carport. This would have required 116 on-site parking spaces based on the following table: Unit Type Spaces Units Required Parking 1 Bedroom 1.5 spaces per unit 48 72 2 Bedroom 2.0 spaces per unit 12 24 Guest 1 per 3 units 60 20 Total 116 However, the Senior Housing Overlay District allows 0.7 non-covered parking spaces per unit, or 42 total on-site parking spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide 60 non-covered parking spaces, which exceeds the 0.7 parking spaces per unit. The parking space requirement for senior apartments applies regardless of the number of bedrooms per unit or the guest parking space requirement. The reduction in parking spaces is determined to be adequate as not all tenants have vehicles, or drive, and the SHOD criteria requires units to be in close proximity to commercial, professional, and recreational services. 2. Dwelling Unit Density Bonus. In order to maximize net yield per acre, an increase in the allowable project density may be permitted by either granting up to a twenty-five (25%) density bonus to the project site's existing density category, or by granting a request for a change in density range (per the City's General Plan), or both depending on the quality, size, nature, and scope of the project. The applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment application to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (4-8 du/ac) to High Residential (24-30 du/ac) and requested a density bonus above the base density range to increase the project density from a maximum of 24 dwelling units per acre to 26.6 dwelling units per acre. The maximum allowable density for the project site, including the base density plus the density bonus is 30 dwelling units per acre. 3. Fee Waivers/Reductions. Projects submitted under the Senior Housing Overlay District may receive, depending upon their size, nature, and scope, a reduction or waiver of some or all City-imposed development submittal and processing fees. The applicant has not requested a fee waiver or fee reduction as part of their Development Agreement. E. Minor Exception DRC2014-00713: The project also includes an application for up to 8-foot high walls (2 feet of retaining and 6 feet of garden wall) along the west and south project boundary. The additional wall height is necessary because of up to a 2-foot grade difference at the subject locations. There is an existing wood fence along the west project boundary and an existing chain link fence along the south project boundary. The wood and chain link fences may be removed and replaced with an 8-foot high precision block wall with a stucco finish and decorative cap. The stucco finish will be painted to match the building. The project perimeter • P254 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2014-00545, DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2014-00610, DRC2014-00713, AND DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 7 wall will be constructed on the project site; conditions of approval require the applicant to work with adjacent property owners and eliminate any double wall conditions. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code. Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Finding: The proposed wall height increase is necessary due to a grade difference between the project site and existing adjacent properties and is consistent with the residential nature of the Development District in which the project site is located. The additional wall height will provide privacy and security between the adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Findinq: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses as the project site is within the existing Low (L) Residential District and proposed High (H) Residential District, which will permit the development of multi-family residential structures. Additionally, there are residential developments to the north (Villa Pacifica Senior Apartments), west (existing single- family residential), and east across Archibald Avenue (existing single-family residential). Combination retaining and garden wall heights over 6 feet are common where there is a grade difference between project sites and neighboring properties. Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Findinq: There is an approximately 2-foot grade difference between adjacent properties and the project site, with the property to the west approximately 2 feet higher than the project site and the project site approximately 2 feet higher than the property to the south. The additional wall height along the west property line will allow adjacent residential properties to secure their private yard areas with a minimum 6-foot high wall. The additional wall height along the south property line will allow the applicant to maintain a minimum 6-foot high wall between the adjacent land uses. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. Findinq: The approval of a Minor Exception is appropriate for proposed wall height increases that would ensure privacy for both properties when there is a minor grade difference between adjacent properties. F. Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275: The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit application requesting the removal of fourteen (14) trees in order to accommodate the development of the project site. Two clusters of Queen Palms are also located on the project site and are proposed for removal; however, Section 17.16.080(E) identifies that"trees planted, P255 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2014-00545, DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2014-00610, DRC2014-00713, AND DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 8 grown, and/or held for sale by licensed nurseries and/or tree farms ..." are exempt from Tree Removal Permit requirements. There are fourteen (14) trees located on the project site, three (3) of which are heritage trees as defined in Section 17.16.080(C) of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. The heritage trees include one (1) Coast Live Oak (Quercus argifolia) and two (2) Cork Oak (Quercus suber) trees. The non-heritage trees include a variety of fruit and nut bearing trees and other trees not meeting the minimum height and diameter requirements of the Development Code. The applicant submitted an Arborist Report, prepared by Glenn Lukos Associates, February 27, 2015, which identifies that although the three (3) heritage trees are healthy, their location conflicts with the proposed building and associated site improvements, the trees are not suitable for preservation, and their removal will allow for the economic enjoyment of the property. The landscape plan demonstrates the three (3) heritage trees removed as part of this project will be replaced in kind with a minimum of three (3) 24-inch box size trees. The replacement trees will be in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Additionally, two (2) non-heritage trees will be removed along the southern boundary of the Villa Pacific complex boundary to accommodate the driveway connection between the two projects. These 2 trees were planted as conditions of approval for the project and will be conditioned for replacement on the Villa Pacifica site on a one-for-one basis and at a minimum 15-gallon size tree. G. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held in the Villa Pacifica Community Room on November 17, 2014. One property owner from the surrounding community attended. The applicant presented the proposed project and no specific objections were raised. The attendee did question the design of the proposed driveway connection in the northwest corner of the project site, between the proposed project and the existing Villa Pacifica development, and if any trees at the location were to be removed. Staff determined that the only trees to be removed at that location are those that conflict with the driveway improvements and that the majority of the existing trees at this location were to remain in place. H. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Fletcher, and Granger) on March 3, 2015. The Committee approved the project as presented. I. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on March 3, 2015. The Committee approved the project as presented. J. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative • P256 PLANNING COMMISSION DRC2014-00545, DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2014-00610, DRC2014-00713, AND DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 9 Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot plus radius of the project site. Staff has not received any comments regarding the proposed project. Respectfully submitted, , 12 Lft Candyce urnett Planning Director CB:TG/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Alternate Driveway Proposal Exhibit D - Concept Master Plan Exhibit E - Floor Plan Exhibit F - Roof Plan Exhibit G - Elevations Exhibit H - Grading Plan Exhibit I - Landscape Plan Exhibit J - Design Review Committee Action, March 3, 2015 Exhibit K - Driveway Agreement Exhibit L - Initial Study Part I, II, and III Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Map Amendment DRC2014-00546 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00547 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Agreement DRC2014- 00610/Draft Development Agreement Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2014-00545 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00713 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2015-00275 --- - P257 acs,114 50C115 K. 1550-1.156 4011161 ai le YHAirirJ Vgp./YO gC.IYtl 1NaNdo13A3O'01 J r n,.wmioa.aum' NOUVLIOddOO IN3Y1do13n3O ONIS(lON 39NMO ■ - - -- -- - - C s 4 poss 1' .ua.w•...... _$ C it a /D/''� S C VJ S1N3w1aVeV II v7I31JVdd ifIlln $ 1 _ den uogezyitn aIIS - .. .1 ...,. ..... . • a e .Q c , ,i_yrdh---rt I i i.amn NInilHO I _ o 1L1l VW 3V. T-1..M A WM It ' i; ii Q.Mlg11 1111 "!B: .!i,.xIUI1nN- is /I/�NIx • . Al sumo._._.• I Ji$I)li1j Lia "6NxInN\C:/gym I =�.. =•uuiui = .fin 1: DAB - Ixnnx.u,.!' ;111111112 �•� m .�%NINIIIixI.�.� ' PTV I 8 Q N m..m ., ! P25 � § r B 1N3Wd013A300 V0 •_ . .-._ _._ .I 4-1t o: , NOIIVLIOd?1O01N301dOl3A30 ONIS(lOH 3ONVO0 o s b,...,,. sew a m E • VD/01031'011d _ a II IJI VdV iA �� a NVld 31IS 1 , ra..m. ,1.eau. no .. .Q ,m.+.v, - -- \• 3fIN3Ab 0lb81113W „,,.-''./7",i,i<0 0-Cr' -:•111,t 1:1,:v' rl Z 1 i Z i N1 ° K i-- / u ^e I j I 0 t .;,. 6 . '1 8 8 c, 1 I I Ini r” — 1 71------A. 1• • • o 1x0 , , $ I " n spa i ,a te , - I - 322 - - ' -- ;„ .0---/- ,.❑;�JOr7A�G�C-I i� Ij i .; r r 1:.„,„,:„.1,5„,..,_,,...„n. MI .R AiL' 7I = • j e�rrnp-�� —II - - A. a 'SI '„, ..":'-'4>.'4:%)".1.' S a <a -- x — j 7 , \ � ® o a§ g - o J {{ fff 6 3i P3 - 9 '"3 g3 4;1 _ ' z o u le ',,_',L. .q -,, .. i b i z g. t �0 I °T , ,, �. 4 �� w o roe i$ w i r I ID(u lad__ _ R__ - ili' I -_ _ _ - .—i -.°�ft Jai/` _ a a=S - n a % �I"§"; 4 R j l .v ,(17----.� –.L -. �' a _ Pill-) a ra ius ? 9' 'P S∎ I 't - .. . ri / l Et 4 's �u a �I$3 1 'a i3 I~ L1 Pc s/y// -.C. i :, EXHIBIT B - 1 • H ._ . , , -P259 ,,, , . • , . , . ' • our.4;■,T2,nt . . , . I ' NOI1VHOdL100 IN3VC,1013A3C ONISI1OH 3ONVNO ; 0 " ;,... 1,, ■• ' •‘■ ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,....,../.5 I 3 ..= ■4 3 E NVld 3Al2:IG • < ; : .,.......,.,..— A2i1N3 1. 3.VN2J31.1V I ' II VOIJI0Vd tillIA r...rs....td,,L,86 = E TO . _ • 3 AN3AV 01,11314104V , . ,... __ ____. _ _ ..., ) _ _ i . _____ . _ k, 1 i. • ) , , - . , • , ____... _ 1.. . j i' . .: . . '. .. . , • ___I himilosr I _ 1 Mira _Z.. H . im se _ .. ._ , 11 . 1 . . . I mi t _ .,, ._ . ii —I-- :;.,rD • I ; . ' cCES I . . a..— \ !I 1 al \\ , Li., ,,.. ....„ . ,/ -.1 E III . .; LI 11 II ,::1 0 IN NI .■ >- 1-i ii FU r il --.. CC ..,.. . Z UJ t w ri CT-71f <A MIL ! i 1 A . V iL17, • . __________ .1 ■ --I -------. 1 _----. , . ,.r. . — r -----. ' , , 1 _ ------___-_ f . _ ./2 _ _____ - 5-43//s- _ I ..., EXHIBIT C _ . 1 1 . P260 i , ] 1 < 6 ' , , 4.•..t1:47,:i T . I " I i 1. C ; 114131.1d013/430 0 St 3 ' -1-:-I---; '"II;7: NOIIVU0d41031141301d013A3GONIS(10H 30M/410 (3) 11 -= E',. ,...ns...le'1,11■Ele ,ii; -. i § NVld :131SVIN1d3ON00 ,. , 1 < II VOld13Vd V311A 1 I 4...A.s....ma ..,• i g 1 IQ, —__ 3f1N3AV alVE11HOLIV t , .. r_ \ i---- --. - VO #101 —- rr, „ . i- . ,, \ I •, , h, ___ __. , ' 1/? -' ■---1 •1 I.- -.:.-\ 41-,,, - \ ' /''' 0 /0\-,..— I.V,..>_,,,..•.:1 ,.._. .,• 4l i ---.; 2.-7i..,.1.,,•,,,,:.::..>‘• 1 . 1 LI .,74 ,,, 1 , •1.,,j;:,,f,s1 1 '- l'' _. 9L4',...:-• a,:v, , • _ ._. - 114110 I , /-1.c:-.: a •,:x .- _ C _ CV * i-t 0 I- 0 _I -J 0 t'4 I'61 iii C.0 2".(2 /1 - 1 / i 0 •.I i ta 7] is r . zt • 4 -----. _ 1 , 1\1 ( II 2 (7) ce i-k UJI I--, -P'-- --- — o ----- - i 25 ----, .,3 ... 4t I- 0.4 < ticsII!c.',I.4. 4,0. : 1.. 4. N, .:ts,p,;.,,,, i_ 0 0 _1 '::-.&.:Z , ,:k::,:„.„, __I . 1 CU b 0 k 444:444 4:•:•:.*::14 Z•`- , I (4 w 0 7 C.)N , r ' -- , Ci il CC —,' \ '. 1 , I 7 cn . •,1 i‘ 1 3:Z -17; i 4 I I 1 \ 1 1 CO It I- I- -.I ill, 0 _J I 4 1; • ,f, 1 iIIIIV I. ,_4' 4,t \ 1 t C44 Tk ; ) ; 0 -J / -I i- ,,_1____•--. •. / \ -. ----' -- ---- - , '..T-','IC:, 7''' '‘, - )--1 1 .- - ' . ' , ' ''— \ .-../' , --- . . , 1 (' i ' tf•: -- '.- ---- :.1 rt1 I-0 .‘ 0 L. k '11- •1 ■•••••••• ...■ 0 , . , "s. / ■ // 0 _I 0 / \ 1 ———————.--'I _ — PC 53//S 1 I EXHIBIT D . 1 i , 1 P261H „, ' 1N3N1c1013A30 0 9 3 ■ ' 1 ' -M--71=rm:;•,; , NOL1V80c1800 IN3INd013A30 SNIS110H 3ONV210 0 1-h-■=3: i C\I , -f:C4-• °i!'1 ,ollmarns i1...I a 1,1,/6 .° .%.. % -2 SNVld 210Old i'l 02111-118 ON003S'IS2Ild 1 ' . (4- Csit C.-) Ff q " i'' ••--..-.. ' '9'• 4 --9: 9)"---. a Is ° . i..–.. I' -...,.-. . ;--•.. . . mi • 1 1 _,., ,.., .. ii• -i- , li Illit rfli .__■_= i ' r ■_ . ■:. Oil 4 0 I Mir" 1111AI railer . ,:i m, I '' ' 'Firm-A . ft .IEESIIIEFEEE 11- Eri, qtr=-EEE=--=11-1 . A . I A " • '+' 1—Mi. '-laTirieliWIE7v; :11 *7".' =14=11-11g. - • (6‘ Woo 4.-11-...4 -='+' -{-g, MA '..,.: 0 I. UMW -1 iimpli ; , 1 adris iim=--= il■in(r4. ,.. •ii Eel L- ___., -, fil _,...:- -2411, • -=' 'i i. M NM 11 • , . IR! A 111 cl 41111 v IIP=-..E.-,161 I Blairj=7;v '' ...---II. IIM::: H=:...--. .-:--z- If !III . pra•-•--i"; ,.1,•-•al. . . .- . 1 lari, , ..., ,, .. igat op dim - - V— ANNE ilill. AMR Elt 4 1a C.3; Q__Millillirl' j=4 4-4 p":NE 11.1_11_•_0 A milt Iff4;! i A Oa+i 'Raz; A 41111 IAMBI l AU. ii Hal Im! ' I IEEE '11E9T. •-_-,.. , --.MIII m , , m --"i, NI A uge ffilii Ell -_, MI um, -.. — .---; IN -----' 1-III =.4 NI - - ..-, • I MI MO IIII " II5 alli , . et a ' H=A--4A :. ■ Will 111M-1:: uriffe 4 'IMiii , , l lAilt v EL?' Ariz " v 42:4 ii,14_,T-Itervii‘ " v,Elf MilbIl -',--- ' - 11.1 IMP iwe ,iii • - . , , 1 11 .i4.. P iE: llr.MH - 1w iirmr i..„,... ,..g...,1 w! ... . u ...i,—. eci 3 •,-Iwi - , 0 lia4 I;Ell ' occ .— . Ti oi , . `111,-It Nat, 8 ; . 91 . --E '---.:, Li■I A ' Ele-` %nag Mi. a ihrtiv r&T.11 MI •..,i- -7. I 1__FFI-nri • ••';Ell 2s - 19 www —1'—•2,0 1 D i = w I , 0 t, U _ cc LT. t I ,_ill• i L - - 1 , .:( - LI. _., a a - k•-: ■• ,. o (2 'A ■ 2 . . _44 _k i "= - — 0. -4, -,..■ 0.-- -4 I) 5 7 I I 5 CO IN I 5 7 I — a:" ■ i . 113 3 1 , . 1 , n v, ■ 01 _I I - _ I.1 ..• ' IF iffi IMIli ilii - IF Ili& . 6 ...1 11/ :—.."-:. IlEit Mill 1 I m.: ifflii dig ......... ,,, 17, .., —.0, .....„. .. ... BNI,,,, or I ....ii. 113, 1., I:07F f US 'V " V UN I ' ler 10 :10.1 A MI. - ... , 111111 C. ■NE 11111.1 ... r a AB ,3 •-„, ,..... ., . 9 , 11111E .. NM". PMII a sl A _ 4,1111. Ai .9. Impair yip,* , .; i'll'211,' ral.I.J. I -- I iiri 'GI , r,•,3., :.,,..Air .. Ea ,ff_am A Fel PM E ' • 1.1[0.2 .* ■ Mitt• 0111,, .10-......-4 1 , 1.1 :ER I . " ilt 011-72- IL Effi 1 Et ipll eat, a Et I NI . alga "rii II".0: , as .., ,.: . =--I faihm. la' affillili . 1 iitir41 iriiiim... ' lom ;gat , - ..,-., IL-.--...--ar mit' •-_-=.I. ' ei.1-; Ii .E. g I'M .• ii. — 1 1- ' Ini, - -±; mir 111111. MI= 1 I; r Mr misit '-'•1m 11.1S, law I ; r.jiiieg, F100 4 4. WA mink , a 11 .7.11V, iall' '''' o i Alai SI ;.,... .:," I ..........,„. IIPir „... i im-41.4 , ER . ; _ 7-- . • .„. anlitl• ,•?..--1. . • -L,,, limmo4 : I ..L. 04 i _I mine r 11111111MMI ' MI. .4-11 F: , 4 . _ R; ! 1 ... .... • , ., „ : , . ...._.. ti._ ,:ti.... ..4....- ,11_,...... =mg la' -, ■ Ell V=1.1 F.,--7hOlfutlfla ' ' '-'3' .." la ,::=I 3 1WhiEffri A .i OMR t. am .11 1 illE I. - , 17 == .• III. , , • ii . - CFC '.-9',2) (•2 ..,) . , EAEXHIBIT E -■ P2 6 2 Q 1 : 1N3NdO3A3O O 8 O —1-7-17-1°o s !NOI17aOdtlOO 1N3WdO13A3O 95118110H 39NVII0 . ' i i ,.". M∎ s Q• . _ .820181vls x9e01/wooa ulNnwwoo 1 _ II 801d1OV d 8.111A v re;" - ilI d • ;i 41 en\ i L- ° I ° Q�l gg j " I3S6101 oS Z II ----- - - ~ ,�a I 7 - -—-�en aYt =g w W �C D W� �_,... C.� 4I , • k o W o _ o LL iri rf � FI m \ fn _ .=_J 0 r Q r cc o 11 \ U m• a a w 2 ..o..s \ ° cc 4 -i A , z = LL I V .II x o 0 ° II 1.3N118`80 fl 131118'80 i t m I � _ _� \ : I• I J ° 3 © 1 0:P , • in y w • _ . ._ . , 1 , • L_ m m x t • re of Z • . Q - X1 1 1 / o- O oi o �° . . - l I I > N }n , . '1 8 n \ __ _ c '. 1N3Wd013A30 0 9 0 m i o' I 1 NOIIV8Od21O01N2WdO13A30 ONIS/lOH 30NVNO .� — - LY ._ .. — -�s.,,,,.na_--- v - I E nit. _ II VOldadd iin o s °; m 3, m ` SNVld IINfl j • Ny. n n 8a i. 1 6f pll • w°$ $° i '.1., u.1=L,11= :o VI ,,,V4'3.;1.113:1; r,j i J � ,, 41 .-+i I •�i . a Gii I L— : - km,2 .' 5 ...., ,, 1 _. n = 1 — ! j �: Li II �_ q �x �r w ` It • j ■ i J ~I' ion Ji j''i 6'AIN r0 :;. - I 1 I i I III 17 ' I 1 . t ii • 10 P J •e1 9 a ' �I I j N F. ° vi I I I®1' a 11 Ill'• o M1 Q Z q r • tom= • P264 11,131,1d013A30 8 0 NOI1V60d2100 IN31Ald013A30 ONISII0H 30N1,180 - • • . . ' ' < H < . 3 ° a • • . . le..ans..,,u..,:s 1 '"cg 2.g -g 1•JJ..r,S'Jul.,',t,„, . ,-2,C..2 7 11 VOldlOtid YllIA ' g . ' 1...ws,,,womd ,:/5/9 ' 7 '... ... NVld d002:1 V. 1 ' 1 9 6 . 6 i N\ . • -... g g 2 • •S \ COI 3 L11 I 9 . „,- ;,,• 6 2 ; . ,— 2 5 •'; ..: -,,- :: ; CC , e 4 g 1- g, 8 4 . ;:. ■ ! : i ,5 1 <_,/ i i i 4 1?: • -\ \_ 4 q i i a ... 9 9 9 6 = E.8.8EEECID- \ . ' . . ., t , - g ; 1 , AO,H. . . F Mir'■ • ■ I •E , 1 z 1 t 0- ! 1 ,\ .. 0 i.—. . IX 1 1\ <-8 ----- . [ I ' .... .., ,.E - C ,--- ' \ . —{ - -,, I ' . --"I ., • \ \ , \ \ : H . 2 ,j 6 9 2•8 \A• :.71 ,.' ;if A z z ?:'' 5 8 -•”- I 8 IF LN , : ' . 5 - • - = . ..: 5.2 .8 _9. •.• — .8. 881 i E\2 -' i 161- ; g 7•\'' 3,4, ' / ,...1..6 „,,,,,::::i o,,,',:iu L ,c Lu)ru`. '22 :2\2 „,j -.-....4:L ' 18, l•-...,' 17> / 16 • ' .11i ,'`i 3 66441'1% -larsqL1 F. ;11gg g, ''' gg'9.'Q''.,•2',71.`IgT--• . !. Zuj'8'1,8'9°11*'"''' • /27 S -45/AS--. t EXHIBIT F I- . • i P265 . x,.■.2:4'4:4 7.: , , . . . • I . . I O 1113INd013A30 0 0 , ,N01.1.V210d2300 li■13N1d013A30 0141S1101-1 3014,72/0 : I , I : : I 4- — 1,. I F' • . : .tt•'.: 13't6' • . < ..:4X2 - :1 L ± i • . , 6 VOIJI0Vd V111A • . It1.1"5..■■•te ..5/9 ' 2;tl 1' SNOI1VA313 1:101113.LX3 ,,... I c•-sj--:: .4- .--ar ■ ,, ,,.k_• ' ,11 Cf) LI..;. •. N ri--R.1.1%,...11--- - tu 6 —': 0 '0;1:7•;', 7Npit . efj76:• z ,. 't• Ai • . ■ ._1: '' i 6 •.1. ; •=i , MI' -111,1q111 q g '.:.till DI IV — .. ■... Z 0 0 ■,.' .s.1 . ,, ag i; El::: Z . 0 0 a g ''• 0 . 7 z K MI IE 5:: piaLliiiii .,-, 1, 27110 :11. 11' 0 0 • ,,, ? S. :1 • 4 1,1,::: . . = „ . 1 gillE :E U.:: IT<II36 ! iiE Pi, - E-1 W:Maiiiii ,‘: wia-ED. E.-JsEs 71 kil"..T , 140vAlil 1, ;ftfiL a l'i'roslria -- .e. E _ •• 1 4, g 1::,.:12: •••:: ,.tpli:4; wog mft.,: ci r El li l'.; -:7:.!111r11",•;',;,44..4 . . .• 1::: . , ... ....,36. -- •., ,.......-- ,F. S _ .. <,' Hila i.,ii.'•i,.fl/1 1!c i■I I 6: gr= •—:.: - ...=: ...e. :::.: r ....- .:.: iimi 1 . I . . IIE 11 ff::: M pi a •E •;: ..... STISINNINali ' g' . . • . 1 1 la rii EEI ilismedimaki . . 1 1 : 1 .,:t ,,..,:••'. — . _ _.. .., . c.) .. -IN■mic:-...:V4INM.• a' ,..1E., N4 . '" iii llij I■•■if-A-- , .. . . .. 1 r"11141117 . . iir= ..2 •:,:, _ ... Mi. r, I.:: rzfrill .1 .:: „pp.. :,- ••::: - r--.5 = :: II IF ME ff.:: SI 111 IC Ili • ri, ■N. ■■••- ■■■:: --iljUll il 1;;; 4., Rill 1--x •iiim :IL • ® 7, . _ •- .. 4, I, I • .....:1:.,:;.,. - • . _ .•. -;:ii 10 --1•16 , r-2.--.- .:: IF El • .,.v•••„._ _ -„,turiaji :: i-• :-1.•,, lir •Ilrfl 11 ,. .., .0.1 W M E . ''• 1E:_ ,!' - :!All Ail ajs: in. •••4 N:.. - ..;.: ,,...- 1 • •.:PA12.,1 :14 :::.: ,-• -11 4:;r.t."91'...—•:-: pj,__ ,,c,„_:, kiill-ii la: a, g 5.-i.lull It 11.1 -111111■11■ i .._ . ,,.._...... 4 7.„..rq...- - : 1-•=1 ;; 711r.: t1•1001= -...1' • ri 1 rr6. 1110e,i-J.Alga lat . 111 ail: 11::: - 1 • •• kin IA.. . '. Milli liV: ...,_ , ' s.%ON 2 s BEL, I..... • 117, • -t. 1,-__Bujgi- • , , , rt 7F -vv-as . ,E q.,!.'..;- -• EXHIBIT G ,• • , , • • , —13266 H 4 • , • ..=‘,47,•,,, • ! • , • 1 1N31,1<1013A3C1 3 57 3 7-1---'Er1-11 3--4" ' NOIrdel0d600 1N3Vid013A30 ONISII0H 35NV210 ■ • , r..- I SlIV130 .i , i < II VOld I 0Vd VillA 0 \ 1'2 .tl.,%:. , .,,,,,.ii; .7'1 —1 '''',7'''k, ,,,,,,..,, .‘•,, ,-- - . co -,. _. 5 .,°.. ,to ..,.■ ' 6 ?1° ' ' ■1 ' ,1 r.1-1;4' CI.. = — I -i',i,' '/ _ \_,.- ) =, --,:' _L i•• , my . *. E.= 15 1 ,c ,3.,:,•,„•,,,,,,,,,,, .. — Mt — --) ' ---- I' d, E ! -7-- r 0. „.., _....„ ,...) i,......,..,:iii-,;,::,,,,,,,47,:-4.7.,.,:i. i 0 ;',. . ,, N s _ I I ..-,-; 0 ! E', ,. . mom •RE / ! -_-_• ffi 1.11 V. t..t. P ,,, . e , 1 g < . 6 3 N ,.-2 A-1---=-7 BI al • _ = > ° 3 -4 3 6 - 3 — i== = 0 g '2 '; 4' 13 7-77_7- - l'. ) ---3 i-- iS;Silifflilij. L 0 . 4 / ° 71 f . ..,==-- E ' ; .1, 1 '; -,_ --1 = — _= - ; 111 •. ',. x -3 ,f, 1. g t 7, I. =._- ,---1 ma 00E0000 -I --,=, E. ,-1, m = , .?„, ri.liii- .).,' -.., -1=1 1 I 111 1 F22112 :If 1 , . =- •,,,,i? ..,:i.,x,-„, J-s--.---- EM3 = ,e..., ,•f,1 -_-_, . _ , `;',A'...,..,`,',i '',1P ' i' , .... NM II ;;,or '- a \ — 1---. A \ ' 3, 1,71-',. 451-4. ,/ .r -I 2.-1 __., 7=/ "1-- ' -3 )71-- 1•_, -ffi. __ ,,,,,,,...,••,,,,,, i"..,,,,...... ,,• ( ._i 1- 11 Ai ,,„ 11,7111:1'1.1; --,-,— Wiletlealt, 11:1 , m -7a-A 01 i1: 1 '\‘1- ■ • . - 1 1. 1.L11 ! //'' '''' i 2■i! i i. - Si Gjai - milll ANT == - I i --/ P 1111= , -1 1D-.., • . - if -- [>1 _.1-` MI , .......1 , Q7, 'i 74''.4:6.it. 1:111.1 ' , '7,11,, I 1 II i± , ...... _. 1 —- '''1'4'.-"''''-'•',1‘•A''Z.'.s , . LNIV% - i,,,,,•:-13''•■ • 1'1-1kN-— *'-• 414 . ,_ ...°°,,r _4407rh.,,------------Raw , ...._ ova 7=.=- mil .,.. ,„: ,, .., ., .4e•TAfre:T4 v.''e), 4,-',2,- ,,.:%."•44.,,,Q.- , k-1--, Il m 0 ..,..11,1 , -i---- )i.;,,..,,,,, 1 d_ . , ., ....... ,..„...,..- M ' 111 --J -;Af 4,q• ,P,, I ------• 4 __,I g,• ..1.. ,7 . I ,.74 .w.. „.;. [ 'i,, i , —/ ' i'='i■ I. ■ , I [ i ::V "I''`'-'i>i-,,,'''z''';'',4!:! . = -f-1 1.4. i - --- - t:Ar.z...x.. E ' 1! ....z Y _ .1..1.1 r---1 II-- Ltc re ,' *,-40 7.,:"6, -t7' -- - -= = ,,°,3iic 7A c'.,?.17''.V....Al ...., ?' ,, --- 4,,,; ', - ,,,' A,A:,i.,!..,,,iiio.,, „i;,,- 0 „.41, g--1 , ----,-,: i --2- 0-,.' L- =or in ..,:t.(L=FL-:1 a E !t ==--- • ----.,__Ii 7, :i:;4,^i,._,,,, ,,,,,..,, ,a4r,_ ----: i. ,-,---, I 1 — =' En ,, N--` • 1--_, ',Aig I 1 - s''.41 a 11 , ,,,,, —,_,. ..,;„ , _ ,— E ',,,, d -,— \,. 4- , —C- - -- , t--_- % ili - • , f:72 -'ff-F; g- et -I. ' ---, -1 --.---=,' 1—,I I ''''''''47 — M - *YE ■•-- L , _ ._. - A 12 .L1--\ = 1,-1-- 7--=7. ■ - r1-=.7,1 ci 1-1= rk, „ > .`.11,j11111"31 •- V.0.7 -.4;1)2)3' • �,.,b�>", �.� H, - P267 Mal vlrondrTq VE.101%7110 OOMd 1N31A1d013A30 37 0 13311:11.5 7effIGEMLL aum, NOIIVLIOd2JO0 1N3WdO13A30 ONISfOH 3ONV8O N S3}07OSSy•Ig n Haan)unQ ,='1 a V ...:„a.. c selaa g suopoag S1N3W12JVdV II V01dI0Vd VIIA , r. a u..,u., wig»on eo n.e.n„�mw.� .xa a. u a a .i.... i 0 al t 3 3AV ONBi w 5 h ; 0 A ,a n" •...s :,k z 'L4. n m nvms. of i mr Z. Si p ii 1 -44 '\I s • l r� --.. I I, k : •y I Y o 3nV mV8IU3W o W Y �x e I / ry e m ---i 80 c. -z- Y • .. e Z$ Y �, / g ° n 1 Co u 3AY OfiHIHOtlV O i_ Et I , i 1 W Rz ii A ,e tS f ' R tl 1 a x I , Pc s-/ /h, -' _i 6y M 143 EXHIBIT H g .51,1■11(11061%. OCCIPLOSUOil lid ,,,,,,:::.,1:4 74 P268 OM. VINOUTIO MOW=019M11 1N3N1d0-13A30 0 2 0 MMUS)0/613.111.1,..301. NOI.MOdN00 IN31,1d013A31:1 ONISrlOH 39NVII0 CO sappossy tg r3.4..1anV uva .,--.„,....,, _ ..........,..z:,....: — i 2 2 • id SIN3141.1.iNcIV II V3IdlOtld VTIIA. ue 6u!pato leredeou09 2 e t) -0 M11.4. i • 2 i I 1 i.tl>1 ( ( • < R § x S g'1 __ — IIINIAV i .1; CIIVflIHONV 111N3AV CI1VSIHDNV —fa t5,-i Fr.1.11ro 1...—-- . — ,,--"—.30,511- 04■. .'"\-- —2•,__1,,_ --.-. - --':-__ lk ---. ..... ' -. 0L-_-.--__-----,,4-i---— --1-- • --- -—-=11,-------...--- s- --------s ---— „ _-,_._-.....___-_=-_- — _-_ ____-_ s,---. _td s _i:-_.-- „ t_ __ _t._ _- __ ___ __ . --—- C• l_._.•• _ _•___,.. _— AA.,--, -,—-_-_,, ., ,..: 7 - -... Taira' ^ y Teel. LI. ..'- w a - _ - - - . :-.,-, ..... V:. - ,. a ikr_i \- , _ , -\ "., 1r lb,•1 , , -•!‘--- - -.i 1 - .; ... k," - ,*--11 ,-.. ,I; , --_ 7 , - / zi .13' 74;-:-Li 1"i--'-ril r,,,,,,- 7quIV:_,.t,*18'1 itaA-,7",-, 11,41.-4,'-'-'-', : -I! n:, : I 1 Hout.1 s-"`.."--TE-,--1-?,„,,,,-ni - '---1, J.- , `.*- .''''--.4" ' 'cif ''''l-r-.'- .II:- ... --42:" L.7'. v"". 74/. 1 '42' "17,'11 ..!..-,i.a-;:,- _ii) Lit [... r4 .. ;,-,/ ..ii,,‘'. -,..ii$' '7,''''''''' ' ",44 ' ' ,, , Le''' ..,,..4-4kv. 5L: Li,,, 1 , ..,.. '„,,,A,,,:mg Iii, 01.0fr).1C3-, lirbo.m...p.... :-.1 u I 5 P.- 116. ''s:; .1,tq -.,,,,----T- 1 U . I ›:4.11.wg.o...*-,..., 161,-. i N--.Tm1 „gar . .1 ,i_, ,- - -- ) ,i1 < L. ' ! ii.TA-4.e.11P--A , i 1. 1 m / ....-410---_11-- ' H-',...', 1,...g i, .„1, /\,, / 1 1 r ''• _ *1 mini- U. '''" I rz. 1111111M_'•-q7.-t: , $, , - I. / - / 0 I 1 - 0,,,,, , z i, fi: lmiLiFii,v 7,1v 1 , ,-..-, 1 . migit,g„,.. 1 ..1 , ,,,, . ., il wilitg mu-i- IM''...16-7.al,,, '---7---- ''''-t'1 1 , D i..-- ,T.) ::.,..1 __I 1 .... , ...., ° rap!' ' L_ ; I 1--- ' 1 lll i 1479"1'=-111'' '' 1 —r--,_-7 l'',1!L. 11 "Piti -- -- ;..-.., 1 1 ' l'I'''' 1 ''-'1'" ' '' I I --• • , •1 > .r.. , 1 _. .• ,i4l, ,, um ;pi I , o„,..;-•:,1 .f I 1.421i- ill....tap mol,,-7' • 4'/ ' !, I 14:.5-14:111111•EN 1 .17,n. .., ! :.,.-4:1 : , •—•.i.;(11%-441; ;.- sk- :. • •.: i , . t, ,.: ,..:g., • . NI- , : ----, - 2c,v1.71, :f' ; =.1:..A z: , '. I < , 1 L•:., qs N ,...._ Xi13 1 L' g: I ir I Zi 11 1 ..5 t. i i:1 I - ..3.:11 1 9 ' ,...: g rill!' ,.N.il 11-11 I, c,-, .. -. --.- - . i'4 ! ' c.[$ I- '.E=11P '.1—.1•-t-, ,,--,— .--!-As... ._ -, s R =,• ;k /' , awe". •16 0-, lb.. i. 10/. !.1 , o 5 g g Ng LI i;1E; M ......._. . , -•• .. j,.411 ''' \ ' • '•••, . ,•N ■642:1;; g c----4 -lit gm. 44 •V . 17., •1 '' ' {,ii•-c41:11,'-',.,,i jillit- 17, - etmort, }-. ____ . __ L L-1 —1 i."-. r--7 I r 1 I i I I I I 1 I :;'' __J I I i L__I I— I L_ T.11/13.11311 111 DI OM 7I11151■3 I 12i1 1 II T 1 1 , 1 1 1 § g! Im Ifil 1 I I L I L __I L. I iii,, i___J- L-- 1 . ..,..., v .4., 5 it I vi.t i ■k9 FAiil m(npynnp-o(nin-i >o>1 11181HX3 C A>m z K n D p m Op,=n ,m J _0,,.,2,,_, O Z m C n m C x Z�D V O Z K Z O O D y N=z� --' W — N .I 'M 160 Def- /� /S '�` x Dmm ��OO ZZnm�m1{p D R --"------"-��" �� • �cn�mpm g 4Om�m1�m Z r «.- t., .�. . ` v ��OZp1ZO�C1�01� .••- h `„.+r - f ' • - ' ' N -my�0(.�=f0 'ncmf�Tm8Z r ° �' r O-1,,,,,-,_ m m r.1 ` ��-- o m➢mZAZOO� 1<2*-ZjXD ll ' in A..' , A C q,�,; n �rp1�mcO n=Drm{f N� D , Y ri ,7 A •1 v, O�Wm ZDm Dumw>DA T ! p • _i D K D m ,z M c Z ca m V r "Q[1 s mz�m_, <MOm-00Xmmcn m y _ ■1 • K 00>OM )O<OZDmODmO (� { ---5 aeewww.� � m D 1 D r m'rD HH -• . L 0 Z 3� �f I m o 0 7 if '�„ O DZ AmDDO=CZOZ� -rm7 �R ; i. •:.• �,•. ;L ,aaa ill•Am° rmczmo> zn OmDpp mn v ti .�� o 1 1 O Z cn L _.. ,s, �� — F *Onx55Dm D=K DmZ rm ci - _ a r.... m - s • r D~O m m cn r D c Z cf,m m Z f I --• .-- .�.^ �' A moZmD(n D �O-DAOD_ 0 R QI:• f.6 go 3 N NG)z � *> A rm R , �0� 0/30.n Z1-m-izo).D➢Zycci3O I �N, �. a :� , f- `- D *0 m',;MK WOnpzn t • •i :;Its $ or _, Dm0 n� (ci,Ocn O ZD.s m s . Il,n�� U! .i K Ry A. OCZ 2-f2 mOD w>u'Om> > .1 (. _ -, •111.. "�.. ). 6- in• m x m n m COz • pm° rpm x 02;77,-073 y 1 �iY '�� • 1 D Z V7 m 2 m r O d �.� I — Z 2m� � D D mm0 (nni !�• e ”. IN pm mDNm Am z D i [f ! .k.. i F D O pm I •$11 _011 uR Z m TJelG �� �� r III C' i WW1 Q� � �o m 1 n 1 2 r W 2 1 1 Z m Q] G �'. 3 u+ W D D 0>›,C Z1 O O m?S r �■ �o / �- ,,•,,,,,._ m 30w>,.. Dzconz zcnr-r OAmZ - .c1 III■ . e� �a N?-i mD��O D�m2r�mT n i�' f -t m mnAmy DZmm Zm,p DZx O m `' - h - C iim Q p -D-yZ ' T, = n -A rn y 1 m o D p C'', D fir _ )41E1E-'I. ' -, 1 ..,, .e - . 'f..1 ▪ moayp m m DAm v1 '.'. `e 4 � Mig ro i . O±�m n n DD % .I C, t 'i \ • ., l b, _A .W,W N ,N W N N V N n i, Irt/ kk} -lG��t )iii h , Z C ''''..).> O ID N A N A _ 1•..' '�ff v (� NU pf NW[J Oe 00m -0 N . • • ■; A p W N A O W L lT V y U�A • �•• ✓ N N OD H.. N N N N 1/ N Ip f/ ° .i s • tA R W � WNDm }▪ m Zcn $ o ca!J..i p N • u W t o m � � d 4 ' , i. n '..1�' F m''' ° i 1 }c: �I • i 1d Tr F� ll I -. iiin y ` • (A---=;)iii � N g c * s pi � d . III g m ;1 1. ,iii N • I} f �_..1 _ -_ v 1 I i LANDSCAPE PLANS 3 - --- VILLA PACIFICA II APARTMENTS >W. r LANDSCAPE Q g — )., Cln,munga...in . CONCEPT Tu g ORANGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT (� '^c'i0!�^noccaO3Inc 1�1 f W p r C&C DEVELOPMENT >.ti,.-w...,:,n,,,,,,. 6• • _ — N wso ..,.,.. ...c P27O DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tom Grahn March 3, 2015 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 - C&C DEVELOPMENT - The request to develop a 60-unit, three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land within the Low (L) Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) (the associated General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications propose the High (H) Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre) and the Zoning Map Amendment also proposes establishing the Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) on the project site), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road -APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related files: Development Agreement DRC2014- 00610, CEQA Review CEQA2014-00008, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547. Design Parameters: On November 11, 1995, the Planning Commission approved Development Review DR 95-22 for the development of a 158-unit, three-story, senior housing project within the High (H) Residential District(24-30 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue. This complex was subsequently developed in the mid to late 1990s. The current project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road. The property to the north includes the Archibald Library in the Office Professional (OP) District and the existing Villa Pacifica Senior Apartment complex in the High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD). The property to the south contains a church within the Low (L) Residential District, and the property to the east and west contain existing single-family residences within the Low (L) Residential District. The project was designed to be compatible with and connect to the existing Villa Pacifica complex to the north. The design of the building has a similar building massing; however, the project architecture has been revised to include additional accent material. Additionally, the project was designed to physically connect with the existing Villa Pacifica complex through the connection of the project driveway at the western edge of the project site, various sidewalk connections along the projects northern boundary, and through the removal of the existing wall along the south boundary of the existing Villa Pacifica complex. Staff has encouraged the applicant to establish a shared driveway approach with the adjacent church property to the south. Although this agreement has not yet been finalized, the site plan does identify a shared driveway both entirely within the project site and an alternative design shared between the two properties. Staff Comments: Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: %7G $/.3 h EXHIBIT J P271 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2014-00545 — C&C DEVELOPMENT March 3, 2015 Page 2 1. The applicant worked with staff during the initial review of the project to incorporate recommended design modifications to the project architecture; consequently, there are no major design issues to address. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. There are no secondary design issues. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. The Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District allows the City to grant a developer various development incentives in order to reduce development costs associated with the construction of housing oriented toward senior citizens of low and moderate income. Development incentives can include a reduction in on-site parking, a density bonus, and various fee waivers/reductions. 2. The applicant submitted a Development Agreement that in addition to establishing occupancy criteria, identifies two development incentives. This includes: a. Density Bonus: A request to increase the maximum project density from 24 dwelling units per acre to a maximum of 26.6 dwelling units per acre. On larger parcels a project within the High Residential District is permitted a density range from 24 to 30 dwelling units per acre. Projects under 3 acres in size are restricted to developing at the lower end of the density range, which limits the permitted density to 24 dwelling units per acre. b. Recreational Amenities: A request to duplicate recreational amenities in order to fulfill the total number of recreational amenities for the project. Developments under 100 units are required to provide 4 recreational amenities including, 1) large lawn area, 2)enclosed tot lot, 3) spa or pool, and 4) barbecue facilities. The applicant is proposing to duplicate amenities including 2 large lawn areas and 2 barbecue facilities. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Committee recommend approval of Design Review DRC2014-00545. Design Review Committee Action: The project was approved as presented. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Smith Staff Planner: Tom Grahn P272 AGREEMENT TO ENTER INTO AN • EASEMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement to Enter into an Easement(this "Agreement") is made as of February?2; 2015,by and between 7418 Archibald, LLC,a California limited liability company ("7418"), and the First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga, California,a California corporation(the "Church") (individually a "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties"), with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. 7418-is under-contract to purchase and develop real property in Rancho Cucamonga, California(the "7418 Property"), into the Villa Pacifica II Apartments,consisting of approximately 60 apartment units, a community room and office building and related improvements for seniors. 7418 is under contract to purchase the 7418 Property where the development is to take place and as is more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A. B. The Church owns real property in Rancho Cucamonga, California(the "Church Property") which is adjacent to the 7418 Property. The Church Property is more particularly described in Exhibit B. C. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is requiring 7418 and the Church to enter into an easement agreement for a shared driveway as a condition of the construction of the Villa Pacifica II Apartments on the 7418 Property. D. The Parties desire the construction of the Villa Pacifica II Apartments as a needed resource for seniors in the community and, to facilitate construction of the Villa Pacifica II Apartments, desire to enter into a Reciprocal Easement, Maintenance and Use Agreement for egress and ingress since the shared driveway is to be located on both the 7418 Property and the Church Property, in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit C("REA"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement,7418 and the Church agree as follows: 1. Entry into REA. The Parties agree to enter into the REA at the time that 7418 or- its assign acquires the 7418 Property and closes on the construction financing for the construction of the Villa Pacifica II Apartments on the 7418 Property. 2. Assignment. 7418 has the right to assign its rights and interests in the Agreement to a to-be-formed limited partnership that will own the 7418 Property and develop and construct the Villa Pacifica II-Apartments without-the consent of the Church. Prior to any assignment, the Church shall be notified in writing of the name, address, and contact information of the assignee /-7C 5//3//C 1 EXHIBIT K P273 of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding and take full force and effect on all persons, entities, corporations and/or partnerships who have been assigned this Agreement. 3. Remedies. If there is a material breach of any provision of this Agreement,a non- breaching Party may serve written notice of the breach on the breaching Party. If the breach is not cured within thirty(30)days following receipt of the notice of breach(or such longer period as is reasonably necessary to remedy such breach, provided that the breaching Party shall continuously and diligently pursue such remedy at all times until such breach is cured),the non- breaching Party may bring an action for damages or an action for specific performance or injunction to compel the breaching party to cure the breach. The breach of this Agreement shall not entitle any Party to cancel, rescind, or otherwise terminate this Agreement. The failure to insist upon the strict performance of any provision of this-Agreement shall not be coustz ued-asa waiver of any-breach of this Agrcc twent 4. Miscellaneous Provisions. (a) Notices. Formal notices,demands and communications among the Parties shall be sufficiently given if,and shall not be deemed given unless, dispatched by certified mail, return receipt requested;or express delivery service with a delivery receipt, to the principal' offices of the Parties as follows: 7418: 7418 Archibald, LLC c/o Orange Housing Development Corporation 414 E. Chapman Avenue Orange,CA 92866 Attn: Chief Executive Officer Church: First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga, California 7450 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9-1730 Attn: Bill Williams Notices shall be deemed received as of the date delivered or delivery was refused as shown on the return receipt. The foregoing addresses may be changed by notice given as provided in this Agreement. Each Party shall promptly notify each of the other Parties of any change in its address as last disclosed. (b) Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,and all of which taken together shall constitute this Agreement. 2 1076\55\1516238.6. P274 (c) Legal Actions. If any legal action is brought to interpret or enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover against the party not prevailing, all reasonable costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred in the action. (d) Exhibits. Any and all Exhibits referred in this Agreement are incorporated in this Agreement. (e), Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of,the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. (1) Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument executed by the Parties. • (g) Venue aad Applicable Law: 'Ibis-Agreement shalt be governed, construed, and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California,and the Parties shall submit to the jurisdiction of and venue in the courts of the State of California in San Bernardino County in any legal proceeding necessary to interpret or enforce this Agreement or any part of this Agreement. (h) Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it be in any way interpreted or construed to create, any third party beneficiary rights in any person not a party to this Agreement. (i) Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed,or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision. No waiver shall be binding unless executedin writing by the party making the waiver. (j) Interpretation. If any term or provision of this Agreement shall,to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, then the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected, and each such remaining term and provision shall be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. (k) Joint and Several Obligations. In the event any Party is composed of more than one person or entity,the obligations of such Party shall be joint and several. (1) Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the rights granted and the obligations hereunder assumed. Any oral representations or modification concerning this Agreement shall be of no force and effect excepting a subsequent modification in writing signed by all Parties. Signatures on Following Page 3 • 1076\55\1576238.5 P275 WHEREFORE the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. 7418: CHURCH: 7418 ARCHIBALD LLC, a California FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF RANCHO limited liability company CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, a California corporation By: Orange Housing Development Corporation, a California nonprofit its member By: ` Its: �I6,�'l a2 e4.4"r'L By: �; mac' ' t/ Name: -71 . la I-4-1,{o-L-5' Eunice Bobert Chief Executive-Officer By: Its: By: C&C Development Co., LLC, a Name: California limited liability company, its member — By: Todd R. Cottle, its member By: The Cottle Family Trust Dated 3/8/1987, its member By: rry A. CS e, Trustee 4 1(1761,55\157623S. P276 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 74/8 PROPERTY THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: The North 160 feet of the South 1/2 of Lot 1, Section 3, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian according to the Map of Cucamonga Lands, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 4 Page 9 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. EXCEPT the East 45 feet thereof conveyed to the County of San Bernardino, a body corporate in the Deed recorded March 19, 1965, in Book 6352, Page 952,of Official Records. APN: 0208-031-58-0-000, 0208-031-59-0-000 A-1 1076\55\1576238.5 P277 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CHURCH PROPERTY THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: The South 275 feet of the North 435 feet of the South % of Lot 1, Section 3, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN,according to Map of Cucamonga Lands, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 9,records of said County. APN: 0208-031-72-0-000 B-1 1076\55\1576238.5 P278 EXHIBIT C FORM OF REA RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: do Orange Housing Development Corporation 414 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866 Attn: Chief Executive Officer (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE) RECIPROCAL EASEMENT,'MAINTENANCE AND USE AGREEMENT ( This Reciprocal Easement,Maintenance and Use Agreement(this "Agreement") is made . as of ,2015,by and between , a California limited partnership "VpiP'),.and First liaptist.Church.of Rancho Cucamonga,.California,.a California corporation. (the "Church")(collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. VP1I owns the real property in Rancho Cucamonga, California("WII Property"), which is intended to be developed into approximately 60 apartment units, a community room and office building and related improvements for seniors. The VPII Property is more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A. B. The Church owns the real property in Rancho Cucamonga,California(the "Church Property"), which is adjacent to the VPII Property and is developed as a church and related improvements. The Church Property is more particularly described in Exhibit B. C. VPII and the Church through this Agreement desire to grant and determine reciprocal access and certain utility easements on the WII and Church Properties. NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement,the Parties agree as follows: Section 1. Grant of Reciprocal Access Easement. The WII Property and the Church Property will share a private driveway providing pedestrian and vehicular access from Archibald Avenue to the VPII and Church Properties("Shared Access") as depicted on the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit C (the "Reciprocal Access Easement"). WII, for itself and its successors and assigns, as grantor, hereby grants to the Church and its successors and assigns as C-2 1076\55\1576238.5 P279 grantees,appurtenant to and for the benefit of the Church Property, a non-exclusive reciprocal easement on the portion of the VPII Property included in the Reciprocal Access Easement for: (i)construction of the shared private driveway within the Reciprocal Access Easement; (ii)vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle and similar use and access by any person accessing the Church Property over the Reciprocal,Access Easement; and(iii)access for purposes of, and to the extent necessary for use, maintenance and repair of the shared driveway located in the Reciprocal Access Easement. The Church, for itself and its successors and assigns, as grantor, hereby grants to VPII, as owner of the VPII Property and its successors and assigns as grantees, appurtenant to and for the benefit of the VPII Property, a non-exclusive reciprocal easement in the portion of the Church Property included in the Reciprocal Access Easement for: (i)construction of the shared private driveway within the Reciprocal Access Easement; (ii) vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle and similar use and access by person accessing the VPII Property over the Reciprocal Access Easement; and(iii)access for purposes of,and to the extent necessary for use, maintenance and repair of the shared-driveway-located in-the Reciprocal Access-Easement The Parties agree that as part of the construction of the Shared Access Easement the existing driveways on each respective Property near the boundary with the other Property will be removed. Section 2. Grant of Drainage Easement. The Church, for itself and its successors and assigns, as grantor, hereby grants to VPII, as owner of the VPII Property and its successors and assigns as grantees, appurtenant to and for the benefit of the VPII Property, an easement in the portion of the Church Property included in the Reciprocal Access Easement for: (i)construction and use of storm drains for drainage from the VPII Property (the "Drainage Facilities"); and(ii) access for purposes of, and to the extent necessary for, maintenance and repair of the Drainage Facilities. Section 3. Construction and Maintenance. VPII is responsible for construction and maintenance of the Shared Access and Drainage Facilities and will bear all costs to construct, repair and maintain the Shared Access and the Drainage Facilities,and will be fully responsible to pay for any damage, including but not limited to the Church Property, its fixtures,belongings and any item that is damaged by any event stemming directly from or as a result of the Drainage Facilities. Section 4. Financing. VPII and the Church may each encumber,mortgage or hypothecate the property it owns, respectively,with mortgages, deeds of trust, or other instruments secured by such Property. Any secured lender may enforce its security through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or otherwise, without violation of this Agreement. No Party to this Agreement has any right to sell, mortgage, lien, lease or rent the other Party's property. Section 5. Property Management and Maintenance. All costs of management and maintenance for each Property owned by the Parties, shall be separately accounted for and paid by the-respective-property owner and not as a shared expense; with-the-exception the- maintenance required in accordance with the terms of this Agreement surrounding the Reciprocal Access Easement. C-3 1076\55\1576238.5 P280 Section 6. Uses Prohibited. No Party shall do or permit anything to be done in or on the easements described herein that will in any way unreasonably obstruct or interfere with the rights of the tenants or occupants of the VPII Property or the Church Property or use or allow the easements to be used for any unlawful or objectionable purpose. Section 7. Damage. Notwithstanding the other maintenance obligations herein, if VPII, its invitees, guests, contractors, employees, agents, successors and/or assigns, causes or is responsible for any damage to the Shared Access or Drainage Facilities, VPII shall promptly pay for all costs to repair and restore the Shared Access and Drainage Facilities to their condition immediately prior to the damage. Notwithstanding the other maintenance obligations herein, if the Church or its successors or assigns, causes or is responsible for any damage to the Shared Access or Drainage Facilities,the Church or its successors or assigns, shall promptly repair and restore the Shared Access and Drainage Facilities to their condition immediately prior to the damage and the Church shall pay for the costs-of suds repair and restw atiori. Section 8. Insurance Requirements. VPII and the Church shall maintain liability insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of their respective responsibilities as set forth in this Agreement. (a) Liability and Property Damage Insurance. VPII and the Church shall each keep in full force and effect a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance against liability for bodily injury to or death of any person or property damage arising out of an occurrence on or about its respective property. The limits of such insurance shall be not less than-One-Million-Dollars ($1,000,000)combined-single-limit for bodily injury and property damage. (b) Workers'Compensation Insurance. VPII shall carry or cause to be carried workers'compensation insurance covering all persons employed in connection with construction and repair of the Shared Access or Drainage Facilities and with respect to whom death, bodily injury, or sickness insurance claims could be asserted against the Parties. Section 9. Remedies. If there is a breach of any provision of this Agreement, a non- breaching Party may serve written notice of the breach on the breaching Party. If the breach is not cured within thirty(30)days following receipt of the notice of breach,the non-breaching Party may take legal action. The breach of this Agreement shall not entitle any Party to cancel, rescind, or otherwise terminate this Agreement. The failure to insist upon the strict performance of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any breach of this Agreement. Section 10: No Public Dedication. Nothing herein shall be deemed to be a gift-or dedication of any portion of the easements to the general public or for any public purposes whatsoever. It is the intention of the Parties that this Agreement be strictly limited to and for the purposes herein expressed. The right of the public or any person to make any use whatsoever of the easements or any portion thereof is by permission and subject to the mutual agreement of the C-4 1076\55\1576238.5 P281 Parties. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Parties may, by mutual written agreement, periodically restrict ingress and egress to and from any or all of the Shared Access and Drainage Facilities. Section 11. Subordination. All deeds of trust encumbering the VPII and Church Properties shall be subordinated to this Agreement. No violation of this Agreement shall defeat the lien of any deed of trust encumbering the VPII Property or the Church Property, regardless of whether such deed of trust is subordinate to this Agreement. Section 12. Covenant Running with the Land. This Agreement is to be considered as a covenant and equitable servitude running with and appurtenant to the VPII Property and the Church Property and for the mutual benefit of the owners of the VPII Property and the Church Property and their successors and assigns, and it is declared that if any sale or conveyance of either or both the VPII Property and the Church Property takes place, the new owners, assigns, successors and the like shall comply with the terms of this Agreement. Section 13. Notices. Formal notices, demands and communications among the Parties shall be sufficiently given if, and shall not be deemed given unless, dispatched by certified mail, return receipt requested, or express delivery service with a delivery receipt, to the principal offices of the Parties as follows: VPII: do Orange Housing Development Corporation 414 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866 Attn: Chief Executive Officer Church: First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga, California 7450 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Bill Williams • Notices shall be deemed received as of the date delivered or delivery was refused as shown on the return receipt. The foregoing addressed may be change by notice given as provided in this Agreement. Each Party shall promptly notify each of the other Parties of any change in its address as last disclosed. Section 14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which taken together shall constitute this Agreement. Section 15. Legal Actions. If any legal action is brought to interpret or enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred in the action. C-5 1076\55\1576238.5 P282 Section 16. Exhibits. Any and all Exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated in this Agreement by this reference. Section 17. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. Section 18. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by a • written instrument executed by the Parties. Section 19. Venue and Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed, construed, and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and the Parties shall submit to the jurisdiction of and venue in the courts of the State of California in San Bernardino County in any legal proceeding necessary to interpret or enforce this Agreement or any part of this Agreement. Section 20. Third Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement is not intended to create, nor shall it be in any way interpreted or construed to create, any third party beneficiary rights in any person not a party to this Agreement. Section 21. Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. Section 22. Indemnity. VPII shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the Church (and its respective partners, lenders, successors and assigns) from and against any and all actual liabilities and claims, arising from or related to the Church Property(tenant, licensee, invitee, employee, or guest) while accessing or using the Shared Access and Drainage Facilities, including, but not limited to, any damage to property. The indemnity shall cover the costs and expenses of the indemnified Party, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs related to any actions, suits or judgments incident to any of the matters covered by such indemnity. The Church shall provide written notice to VPII within ten (10)days after Church is aware of the occurrence of any event leading to a claim under this Section 22. Should an indemnifying Party fail to discharge or undertake to defend the indemnified Party against such liability within fifteen (15) days after learning of the same, then the indemnified Party may settle such liability, and the liability of such indemnifying Party hereunder shall be conclusively established by such settlement, the amount of such liability to include both the settlement consideration and the reasonable costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs, incurred by the indemnified Party in effecting such settlement. Section 23. Interpretation. If any term or provision of this Agreement shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, then the remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected, and each such remaining term and provision shall be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. C-6 1 076\55\I576238.5 • P283 Section 24. Joint and Several Obligations. In the event any Party is composed of more than one person or entity, the obligations of such Party shall be joint and several. Section 25. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded in the office of the recorder of the County of San Bernardino. Section 26. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties relating to the rights granted and the obligations hereunder assumed. Any oral representations or modification concerning this Agreement shall be of no force and effect excepting a subsequent modification in writing signed by all Parties. Signatures on Following Page C-7 1076\55\1576238.5 P284 WHEREFORE the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. VPII: CHURCH: , a California limited FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF RANCHO partnership CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a California corporation By: OHDC LLC, a California limited liability company, its managing By: general partner Its: Name: By: Orange Housing Development Corporation, its sole member By: By: Its: Eunice Bobert Name: Chief Executive Officer By: C&C LLC, a California limited liability company, its developer general partner By: The Cottle Family Trust dated 3/8/87, its member By: Barry Cottle Trustee By: Todd R. Cottle, its member (attach notary acknowledgements) C-8 1076\55\1576238.5 P285 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF VPII PROPERTY THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: The North 160 feet of the South 1/2 of Lot 1, Section 3, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian according to the Map of Cucamonga Lands, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 4 Page 9 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. EXCEPT the East 45 feet thereof conveyed to the County of San Bernardino, a body corporate in the Deed recorded March 19, 1965, in Book 6352, Page 952, of Official Records. APN: 0208-031-58-0-000, 0208-031-59-0-000 C-13 1076\55\1576233.5 P286 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CHURCH PROPERTY THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: The South 275 feet of the North 435 feet of the South %z of Lot 1, Section 3,Township 1 South, Range 7 West, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, according to Map of Cucamonga Lands, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 9,records of said County. APN: 0208-031-72-0-000 C-14 1076A55V1576238,5 P287 EXHIBIT C SITE PLAN - RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT , .. hi (-e—,,..,1,,,;,. , ...] ,.. ,.w. 1 . ...t._.....i. ,a �_ a it�� 4 ' : �7 �1 �s ; I :.";� p ''-rum` 4t,. - i :..., i I , v. , 5 1 , - 1 ' 1 11 N . < /y� 1 1 ' i Q -t r47" I ' I 1 a • xv ._4 , , , ¢ , r N FIRST BAPTIST.1 \ I Y ,.` II I } 1 �,_ � �I > IlH1 SHARED ACCESS EXHIBIT C-15 1076A55V15762385 P288 CF A�,y �. fr y City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION [-t'er h: The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, Development Review DRC2014-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547. Public Review Period Closes: May 13, 2015 Project Name: Project Applicant: C & C DEVELOPMENT Project Location(also see attached map): Located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road at 7418 Archibald Avenue-APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. Related files: Minor Exception DRC2014-00713 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. Project Description: A proposal to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential, amend the Development Code zoning district from Low (L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOD), and enter into a Development Agreement for the purposes of constructing a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex known as"Villa Pacifica." The application includes a request for a Minor Exception for a wall height increase along the west and south property lines and a Tree Removal Permit to remove 14 existing trees on 2.25 acres of land. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. ID .5//31/S- Adopted By EXHIBIT L P289i IZii.g , ! . , LN3VIS013A30 3 9 3 ■ . ' . • 1 1.r .411:0i , NOILThOdaOO „ I Ca 170fln, : 1 ,---.--- h I-CCrTid • ■ .. H < : • 1 II I V1701031'03=Id r "rie•E'i=.7.17_ 1 v 7 20 i NV-14131IS • i ....r...i I o vormovernin ......ra--. ., . 5 4 T 31”---- (—A3gerli r--, I - _-- L _ ----- il —I — i ": ' • '''''' A , 11:4c„,.::eix . i b, . . 5 g \ • HQ 7 71 7:t.272,4=51410 0 C 1 1 ' I '--t"'. a• / %' i 'I 7 i i ! 'i 7 1 1..i■ -4-7'5.-- ''' 1:- -1 — - i '''/ ' ''''• ----'--- \ ' -r • — I OEM ow i 1— ; -,7_' _ 1 i ; il 1,-7 • . ,i 1•1 ! 5 3 1 I I 1 1 ii ,..--,-- g qi zigii I " ' ls , itgi;j1 jit1 I ! P4 i it q1i ;,,ligrA Pi4.4 2 t51 ) c „ 110 ; ' PI ' 7,. ,_ , 0-; i 1 4 ; lo .1 • ; • : 1 —1 w; / ili 1-717 = 11-------- .7;I7Z7'3!717 77773417 „, li I (7) =7 ll 977k- pi _ ,„ _ . 43.= 77177 71= ldilL 75347=479 = 77 0 a0• 470a•=7EISEM -14511 s-j2 ;I :ffi ? i ....._ '43110/8-S, Teri 4 eWC— a .:=1 %i•T 4 I•r - A.: 5' P ..,:, I i i •• •,..4 ! a •-.xM:: an J ? i 4 i 2 ,• 'r•-____.- mill ',:\45at: i 1 _ 1 4- ii 2311 ris !„,, i . s 3 ,, 1 ! 4 I ; 54 I • pp I _ 1 $ : 11 1. , 4 i a _ A 7 - I 1 I I 7 74 I --7 i di 4 —II . : AIM Illi '-i-;vi 1 sdij 1,1 n i Tztlaiqo il ; i 1 i-J In . _ I I -, .• 40 17 ;1111 ;711277, / 112* S121 fi .i.1 4.t IiiJ 7.7 ,7Z !. 1 : 777471 4 a 1 Li i ( ? if —1 1 4. 1 11 si g • 7! = 2- ! g g . - g 5 — .im 1 witH7.11:71:T.27•• 1 1 1 ci k, . I : , 1 c L \ ma , 111 il ___ — •i ' 0 0 W 4 1. .-: , .70:, n.-kis jfliii 4 ! i ri - 1 ■ vs-7 .- .2' ' 7-1 8/1--... -. ,„.....211)-- ii :. ".5. . ; 4 9 4; i i 1 _ -____ i j gi- - T.__ --- _-__J 1 i 'I i _ __.1 ) 1 .: . . . 1 , , • i ' . ! r INili ; 5 13. 11 1111 I 1' 1 g:1 1 J14 1 Eiji I V, . 1. -- 111 • i11111 bpi; J ' —z., 1_, i . ill JII I 1 , g a 1 2 aa a 1 a a a i _ — • , i 1 , -- 1 l I I I 1 1 I - . _ Print 290 ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ri S; JUN 10 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL R" _ INFORMATION FORM Ic RECEIVED - PLANNING (part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. 1 Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: P O , Qe9 4. Project Title: Villa Pacifica II Name&Address of project owner(s): 7418 Archibald, LLC 14211 Yorba St., Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: 7418 Archibald, LLC 14211 Yorba St., Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780 Updated 4/11/2013 Pagel of 10 P291 Contact Person&Address: Todd Cottle 14211 Yorba St., Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780 Name &Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Telephone Number 714 288-7600 x250 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): It is located at 7418 Archibald Avenue near the southwest corner of the intersection of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0208-031-58-000 &0208-031-59-0000 '5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq.ft.): 2.27 Acres '6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 2.25 Acres dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The project is utilizing the Senior Housing Overlay. To accommodate the overlay, the project will need to undergo a general plan amendment, zone change and development district amendment. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 3 P292 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: The project will require a building permit that will allow for the construction of 60 senior housing units and all the necessary site work. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads. drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e.. geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The site is currently a single family lot. The topography of the site is generally flat with a slope towards Archibald. The soil stability is addressed in the soils report, but with the recommended site preparation, will be capable of accommodating the proposed building. There are some mature palm trees on the site. The existing drainage generally follows the existing topography. The site currently contains 3 structures, a garage, a small blockhouse, and a single family residence. The garage was constructed in 2010 and is in average condition. The single family residence was constructed prior to 1938 and is in average condition. The external facade of the builiding has been significantly modified over the years. The small blockhouse is in average condition. Sources of information include a Phase I report dated January 10, 2014 and a Soils report dated January 16, 2014. Updated 4/1 112 01 3 Page 3 of 10 tc P293 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books.published reports and oral history): A Historical Study of the site is currently underway. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Vehicular noise from Archibald Avenue will be the primary source of community noise. The interior noise impact from the vehicular traffic will be mitigated according to the recommendations in the Noise Study dated May 29, 2014. With these mitigations, the project is expected to meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga's interior noise level standards for residential development 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: The project involves the demolition of the existing single family home and accessory structures and the construction of a new 60 unit affordable senior community. The project will be completed in 1 phase. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North - 3 story, Affordable senior apartment community and a two story public library East-single story, Single family homes West- single story, Single family homes South - Church and vacant property Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 P294 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The proposed project will not significantly alter the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project. A similiar project in terms of scale and density is located adjacent to the proposed project. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated.including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? The greatest amount of short term noise will be generated during the construction of the project. The noise produced during construction will be mitigated in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's construction policies. The long term noise generated by the project will generally come from the Project's internal roads. Based on the noise study, this traffic noise should be minimal. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: There are no scenic trees on the property. All of the existing palm trees will be removed. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: The site drains through the following: Church Street Storm Drain, Hermosa/Foothill Storm Drain, Deer Creek Channel, Cucamonga Creek Channel, Mill Creek(Prado Area), Santa Ana River Reach 3, Prado Dam Basin. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. y) 15,360 15,360 a. Residential (gal/day) use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑Septic Tank p Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591, a. Residential(gal/day) 16,200 b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 P295 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units:60 Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: The 60 units will be located in one building on 1 lot. Unit sizes will range from 693-945 sf Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): Rental 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $341 to $820 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 50 one-bedroom units 10 two-bedroom units 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: The maximum household size per unit is anticipated to be: 1 BR-3 persons 2BR-5 persons 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: 0 0 b. Junior High: 0 c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Not Applicable • Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 P296 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation: N/A 28) Number of employees: 1 Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Property Manager-$35-40,000 1 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: Potential *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818) 572-6283): N/A ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. The Cucamonga Valley Water District was contacted in regards to their capacity to provide water, sewer, and fire flow services to the site. At this point, they do not see any issue in being able to provide the necessary services to the site. A flood control agency for this site is not applicable. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 P297 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels,oils, solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known. Small amounts of diesel fuel, oil, and gasoline for use in agricultural equipment have previously been stored on site. These items have been properly stored with no signs of leakage. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 6110//11 Signature: • Title: Au f N ol. ? c1 £rlla 10( 7/ Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 7 • 7) P298 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre • Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 or 10 P299 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 • High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 • Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 P300 � 7:fr:g __rw 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga ± it ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II to BACKGROUND 1. Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00547, Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, and Development Review DRC2014-00545 2. Related Files: Minor Exception DRC2014-00713 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275. 3. Description of Project: A proposal to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low(L) Residential to High (H) Residential, amend the Development Code zoning district from Low (L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOD), and enter into a Development Agreement for the purposes of constructing a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex known as "Villa Pacifica." The application includes a request for a Minor Exception for a wall height increase along the west and south property lines and a Tree Removal Permit to remove 14 existing trees on 2.25 acres of land on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, located at 7418 Archibald Avenue APN: 0208-031-58 &0208-031-59. . 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: 7418 Archibald Avenue, LLC 14211 Yorba Street, Suite 200 Tustin, CA 92780 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential 6. Zoning: Low (L) Residential District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site contains three buildings —a residence, a garage, and a small concrete block structure as well as two groves of Queen Palm trees, miscellaneous mature landscaping, and a variety of citrus trees. The property to the north contains the Archibald Library and the existing Villa Pacifica senior apartments, the property to the south contains the First Baptist Church, and the property to the east and west contains single-family homes. The property to the north is in the Office Professional(OP) District and High (H) Residential District/Senior Housing Overlay District(SHOD), and the properties to the south, east, and west are in the Low(L) Residential District. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga • Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Thomas Grahn, Acting Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (909) 477-2750, ext. 4312 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: California Tax Credit Allocation Committee. P301 Initial Study for Design Review DRC2014-00545 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 Page 2 GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR — Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG— Reactive Organic Gases PM10— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD— South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP— Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or"Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( )Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (1) Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (1) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology &Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (✓) Noise ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Transportation/Traffic ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (1) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant eff€E ig this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to,,by the project'proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. -rte: Prepared By: . lvldllV\((,\AA Date: 4.11((7 Reviewed By: '�- (i ' • .- j2) t Date: 1/77/5 Rev 8-18-14 P302 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With man Significant coWith Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, and is characterized by the City Library and senior housing apartments to the north, the First Baptist Church to the south, and single-family development to the east and west. The proposed project is similar in scale and massing as the senior housing apartments to the north and the visual quality of the area will not be degraded as a result of this project. Design review and incorporation of established design guidelines is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. There, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures require compliance with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (1) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? Rev 8-18-14 • P303 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) • ( ) (1 ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, and is characterized by surrounding developments including the City Library and senior housing apartments to the north, the First Baptist Church to the south, and single- family homes to the east and west. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low(L)Residential District to High (H)Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District(SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres,and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In addition, the proposed project is not located on a site that was designated for or contains farmland so no impacts to farmland would occur as a result of project implementation. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland,or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest Rev 8-18-14 P304 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially v nth Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Woad Incorporated Impact Impact land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, and is characterized by surrounding developments including the City Library and senior housing apartments to the north, the First Baptist Church to the south, and single-family homes to the east and west. Although the site currently contains two large groves of Queen Palms, the project site is not agricultural in nature. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land, and therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) (✓ ) ( ) ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations(local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMio), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.3) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter(PM10 and PM2.$)are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Rev 8-18-14 P305 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection,a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. • Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act(FCAA)of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (Oa), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide(SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM25. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis (May 27, 2014) was prepared by Urban Crossroads that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction) Project Impacts There will be minimal short term impacts related to the project. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low(L) Residential District to High(H)Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District(SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. The project site currently contains an existing single family house, garage, out buildings and tree farm which will be removed for development of the proposed project. Rev 8-18-14 P306 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Potentially 9 h Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significannt t Mitigation Significc ant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Emissions Summary of Overall Construction with Best Available Control Measures) Emissions(pounds per day) Year __ VOC NOx ICOI SOx PM10 PM2.5 2016 5.35 64.24 43.90 ; 0.36 6.72 4.04 , 2017 6.80 33.96 r 27.10 0.05 2.91 2.14 Maximum Daily Emissions 6.80 64.24 43.90 ; 0.36 6.72 4.04 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 ; 550 j 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? NO NO i NO ; NO NO NO Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SO, PMio and PM2.5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import), building construct, painting (architectural coatings) paving (curb, gutter, flatwork, and parking lot), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary (Construction Emissions with Best Available Control Measures) Emissions(pounds per day) On-Site Grading Emissions NO, CO PMto I PM25 Maximum Daily Emissions 38.81 1 23.28 4.63 ! 3.22 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 170 1 1,232 6 15 Threshold Exceeded? I NO I NO NO I NO Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Rev 8-18-14 P307 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially wih han Slgnincanl Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated impact Impact Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. The proposed project is the construction of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3- story, senior apartment building proposed for the project. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in a maximum of approximately 6.80 lbs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, • the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. With implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures(BACM) as mitigation measures, the impact to short-term construction impacts will be less-than-significant: 1) All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts (Short-Term Construction Emissions) Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry Rev 8-18-14 P308 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P°ten°ally with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (Oa), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM1o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. This project would amend the General Plan from Low Residential (2 to 4 du/ac) to High Residential(24 to 30 du/ac)to support the construction of a 60-unit senior housing complex. Based on the Air Quality Impact Analysis(May 27, 2014),no short-term impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant: 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Rev 8-18-14 P309 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With fan SiImpcanl Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high- volume, low-pressure spray. 11) Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. 12) Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. 13) Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. 14) Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. 15) Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • 16) Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 17) Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. 18) Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 19) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 20) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Long Term (Operational) Proiect Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of residential buildings in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on- site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Rev 8-18-14 P310 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; 0RC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Emissions(pounds per day) Operational Activities-Summer Scenario I VOC I NO, _ CO 150, PM,, --i! PM„ Area Source : 2,55 0.06 5.02 2.60e-4 0.11 0.11 Energy Source 1 0.04 0.30 0.13 1.93e-3 0.02 0.02 Mobile 1 0.73 2.14 8.67 0.02 1.53 0.43 Maximum Daily Emissions 1 3.32 2.50 13.81 0.02 1.66 0.56 I SCAQMD Regional Threshold I 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? ! NO NO NO NO NO NO 1 Operational Activities-Winter Scenario Emissions(pounds per day) VOC NO, CO 50, pM -TPM`- _--__- i_-.._- 10 May I Area Source 1 2.55 0.06 5.02 2.60e-4 0.11 0.11 Energy Source i 0,04 0.30 0.13 1.93e-3 0.02 0.02 Mobile 1 0.75 ' 2.25 8.50 0.02 1.53 -0.43 ' Maximum Deily Emissions 1 3.34 2.61 13.64 0.02 1.66 0.56 I SCAQMD Regional Threshold 155 55 550 ' 150 1.50 55 Threshold Exceeded? I NO NO NO ' NO NO NO Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) Emissions(pounds per day) Operational Activity NO, CO PM10 PMzs Maximum Daily Emissions 0.47 1 5.56 0.20 0.15 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 170 1 1,232 2 2 Threshold Exceeded? NO I NO � NO _ NO J The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. This project would amend the General Plan from Low Residential (2 to 4 du/ac) to High Residential(24 to 30 du/ac)to support the construction of a 60-unit senior housing complex. Based on the Air Quality Impact Analysis(May 27, 2014), no long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant: Rev 8-18-14 P311 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially can do Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 21) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 22) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 23) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 24) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 25) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 26) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 27) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 28) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 29) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 30) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 31) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 32) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 33) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. As noted in subsection b above, the project would amend the General Plan from Low Residential (2 to 4 du/ac) to High Residential (24 to 30 du/ac) to support the construction of a 60-unit senior housing complex. Based on the Air Quality Impact Analysis (May 27, 2014), no short or long-term, operational impacts to air quality would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are Rev 8-18-14 • P312 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With han Significant t Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within '/. mile of • two sensitive receptors, both schools. Cucamonga Middle School, located at 7611 Hellman Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet southwest of the project site, and Pebbles Christian School, located at 7690 Archibald Avenue, approximately 1,500 feet south of the project site. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less-than-significant levels. 34) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors(Short-term)may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from the proposed residential use would most likely be from activities such as cooking; however, these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through direct removal, filling, 'hydrological interruption, or other means? Rev 8-18-14 P313 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pptenna'Z with nan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, and is characterized by surrounding developments including the City Library and senior housing apartments to the north, the First Baptist Church to the south, and single-family homes to the east and west. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low(L)Residential to High(H)Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low (L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of the existing single-family residence on site and the use of the site as a Queen Palm tree farm. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. The Arborist Report (Glen Lukos Associates, January 29, 2015) prepared a biological assessment and concluded that the project contains trees and shrubs that exhibit nesting bird potential, and recommended a nesting bird survey be prepared prior to any ground disturbances. It is recommended that vegetation clearing activities be scheduled outside of the avian nesting season (February 15 through August 15). If construction activities are planned during the avian nesting season, a pre-construction nesting bird survey should be conducted within 30 days prior to commencement to avoid impact to birds protected under the Fish and Game Code and Migratory Bird Act. 1) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, a nesting bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation; or (b)the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. 2) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, a Burrowing Owl Survey that conforms to the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation Rev 8-18-14 • P314 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With hic Significannt t With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere-of-Influence. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are fourteen (14) trees located on the project site, three (3) of which are heritage trees as defined in Section 17.16.080(C) of The Rancho-Cucamonga Development Code. The heritage trees include one (1)Coast Live Oak(Quercus argifolia)and two(2)Cork Oak (Quercus suber) trees. The non-heritage trees include a variety of fruit and nut bearing trees and other trees not meeting the minimum height and diameter requirements of the Development Code. The Arborist Report (Glenn Lukos Associates, February 27, 2015), identifies that although the three (3) heritage trees are healthy, their location conflicts with the proposed improvements, and are not suitable for preservation. The landscape plan demonstrates the three(3) heritage trees removed as part of this project will be replaced in kind with a minimum of three(3)24-inch box size trees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). The Historic Resource Assessment (Leslie Neumann, June 18, 2014) prepared for the project site determined that the past removal of all but a few ornamental citrus trees, demolition of agricultural outbuildings such as the barn, extensive alterations to the residence, including Rev 8-18-14 P315 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 16 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant With ,c SiImp cant Incorporated a Significant Impact Icorpora Impact Impact additions, non-original stucco cladding and replacement of all windows and doors, has compromised the property's integrity to the extent that it is not a historic resource under local, State, or Federal criteria of significance. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6)indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • Rev 8-18-14 P316 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with man Significant With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded,divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery,the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of the existing single-family residence and agricultural activities (including the Queen Palm tree farm), the construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments, and annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or ' death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Rev 8-18-14 P317 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 18 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiant wm, han Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Hi) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? • e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the project site and it is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone; however, the extreme southeast corner of the project site is located within the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within one-quarter (1/4) mile southeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.5 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is about 16 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is about 18 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation (LOR Geotechnical Group, January 16, 2014) evaluated the presence of seismic or faulting conditions on the project site. The report states that no active or potentially active faults are known to exist at the subject site and the site does not lie within a current State of California Earthquake Fault Zone; no project specific mitigation measures related to earthquake faults are required. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less- than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM-10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Rev 8-18-14 P318 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant I mpact Incorporated I mpact Impact 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.7)indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibit development on slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within a hillside area but is within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation (LOR Geotechnical Group, January 16, 2014) evaluated the presence of seismic or faulting conditions on the project site. The report states that no active or potentially active faults are known to exist at the subject site and the site does not lie within a current State of California Earthquake Fault Zone; no project specific mitigation measures related to earthquake faults are established. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically found at the western section of the City and consist of light brownish-gray course sandy loam on the surface about 10 inches thick; typically used for irrigated crops (i.e., citrus). With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance—The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). Rev 8-18-14 P319 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; 0RC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant With Than SiImp cam coWithon Significant ImImpact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1)that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons(PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride(SF6)). The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM10, PM2.s, and SO2which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards Rev 8-18-14 P320 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However,a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staffs proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non-industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis dated May 27, 2014, total project related emissions would be 497.16 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: - Emissions(metric tons per year) Emission Source I CO2 CH, N20 I Total COLE Annual construction.related emissions amortized 1 20.43 10.004 — 20.52 over 30 years i Area I 15.42 j((1.30e.3 2.60e-4 15.53 Energy 139.66 15.49e-3 2.05e-3 140.42 . _ Mobile Sources I 284.66 ;0.01 -- 284.90 Waste i 5.60 1 0.33 — 12.56 Water Usage 19.54 10.13 3.22e-3 23.24 Total CO2E(All Sources) 497.16 Source:CalEEMor model output.5e•Appendix 3.1 foe detailed model outputs. Note:Totals obtained from CalEEMsd'-and may not total 100%due to rounding. Table results include scientific notation.•is used to represent units ten raised to the power of(which would be written as 10r")end is followed by the sale.of the exponent Direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term(Construction) GHG Emissions—The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.5)indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are Rev 8-18-14 P321 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sptenntiant uant w'm han Site Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (May 27, 2014), no short-term, construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low- emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Lone Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure,"to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the construction of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story senior apartment complex and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that Rev 8-18-14 P322 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than S�Imp c t corporiMon Significant Impact Incorparater! Impact Impap are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (May 27, 2014), no long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. , • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; Rev 8-18-14 P323 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low(L)Residential District to High(H)Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3- story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures,link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (May 27, 2014), no significant short-term construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a, less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Rev 8-18-14 • P324 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentianr With han Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) V) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to • Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? . Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue,south of Base Line Road, and is characterized by surrounding developments including the City Library and senior housing apartments to the north, the First Baptist Church to the south, and single-family homes to the east and west. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low(L)Residential District to High(H)Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3- story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. As senior residential housing, the project is not anticipated to transport, use, or dispose of significant amounts of hazardous Rev 8-18-14 P325 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fotanrair With Th an Significant With Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project proposes the construction of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land and will not include activities that utilize or generate hazardous materials, hazardous waste, or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than- significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is located within 'A mile of two sensitive receptors, both schools. Cucamonga Middle School, located at 7611 Hellman Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet southwest of the project site, and Pebbles Christian School, located at 7690 Archibald Avenue, approximately 1,500 feet south of the project site. The project proposes the construction of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land and because it is located within 'A mile of a sensitive receptor, the project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. The proposed project and use is not anticipated to emit hazardous materials or create objectionable odors. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Site inspections conducted in March 2015 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated eery three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. The project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 P326 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With non Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern .part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? - c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) , ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, Rev 8-18-14 P327 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project,a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an • NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Encompass Associates (August 4, 2014), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: • Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities Rev 8-18-14 P328 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Encompass Associates (August 4, 2014) to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Encompass Associates (August 4, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable • growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.9),continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is currently developed with a single-family house, garage and ancillary out building. The project proposes the construction of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land and development of the site will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water Rev 8-18-14 P329 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ignif With Than Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event,thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The project proposes the construction of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land and is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Rev 8-18-14 P330 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, and is characterized by the City Library and senior housing apartments to the north, the First Baptist Church to the south, and single-family development to the east and west. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding senior housing apartment complex to the north. The project will become a part of the larger community. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low(L) Residential District to High(H)Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3- story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. The proposed 60-unit senior apartment complex will fit into the surrounding neighborhood and become part of the community. The land use change and the project layout is compatible with the surrounding Rev 8-18-14 P331 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With nan Significant pnon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact area and will not create a conflicting land use since it will be adjacent to existing land uses that are designated High Residential to the north and Low Residential to the east, south and west. The proposed project does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, the Ontario International Airport's ALUCP or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan with the exception of the land use designation for which a General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00546) is under review to permit the requested multi-family land use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (• ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev 8-18-14 P332 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; 0RC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. A Noise Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, May 29, 2014) was prepared for the project site, which concluded that with the following mitigation measures the noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. • Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment,fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 3) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 5) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 6) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. Interior: • 7) All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, weather-stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 27. Air gaps and rattling shall not be permitted. 8) All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three-fourths inch thick. Rev 8-18-14 • P333 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S Sig nnn ncaant With man t Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 9) Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one-half inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, well-sealed gypsum board of at least one-half inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 10) Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use. A forced air circulation system (e.g., air conditioning) shall be provided, which satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Mechanical Code. 11) All bedrooms, when in use, are expected to contain furniture or other materials that absorb sound equivalent to the absorption provided by wall-to-wall carpeting over a conventional pad. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low(L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low (L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 12) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • 14) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. Rev 8-18-14 P334 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Th Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an Significant Mitigation Significant No I mpact Incorporated Impact Impact The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 15) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise' mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 7.7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) (✓ ) ( ) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? • b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the construction of 60 senior housing units. It is estimated that the project will generate a population growth of approximately 60 persons. Since the project is an infill project and surrounded by developed infrastructure, adequate schools and the utility capacities to serve the project, this minimal increase in population is considered less than significant. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains three buildings—a residence, a garage, and a small concrete block structure. Because the property is vacant, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project site contains three buildings—a residence, a garage, and a small concrete block structure. Because the property is vacant, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 P335 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No i Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, would be served by Fire Station#172 at 9612 San Bernardino Road, located approximately 1.0 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • c) The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to school districts are not considered significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Lions Park at 9161 Base Line Road, is located approximately V2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in demand for library space that would be met through implementation of the goals and policies Rev 8-18-14 P336 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Th Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact identified in the Public Facilities and Infrastructure Chapter of the General Plan. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future library use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have'an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park(Lion's Park) is located approximately'% mile from the project site. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low(L) ResidentiaFto High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low (L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land which will increase the use of parks and other recreational facilities within the City. The project is consistent with the density of development anticipated for the development district and will not overburden the existing and proposed recreational facility within the City. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project does not include the development of new or the expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and • freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Rev 8-18-14 P337 • Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 38 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) . ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low(L)Residential District to High(H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3- story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each senior apartment unit will generate 3.45 daily trips, or 207 total daily trips, and 0.45 two-way peak hour trips. As such, the project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections and will not negatively impact the level of service on surrounding roadways. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements and does not require the extension of any arterials. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result,the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. As described in subsection a) above, the project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing and only street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site will be required. The project will not create a substantial increase in traffic and will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • c) Located approximately 4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The Rev 8-18-14 P338 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 39 Less Than Significant Less • Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Moigara Significant No Impact Incorporated d Impact Impact project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low(L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3- story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. The project design does not provide typical features to support transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.), but was designed to consider the infrastructure requirements for senior housing, including local infrastructure (e.g., streets, sidewalks, and traffic/pedestrian signals), level topography, a demonstrated proximity to commercial establishments(e.g., food shopping, drugstores, banks, medical and dental facilities, public transit, and open space/recreational facilities) supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Rev 8-18-14 P339 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater - generation for buildout of the General Plan. The proposed project will result in a minimal increase in demand,which is not considered significant. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The proposed project will result in a minimal increase in demand, which is not considered significant. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • Rev 8-18-14 P340 Initial Study for Villa Pacifica Project City of Rancho Cucamonga (DRC2014-00546; DRC2014-00547; DRC2014-00545) Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road at 7418 Archibald Avenue. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low(L)Residential to High(H) Residential and to amend the Development Code land use district from Low(L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOD) to allow for the development of a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. The Arborist Report (Glenn Lukos Associates, January 29, 2015) performed a general biological assessment of the project site and determined that the site contains trees and shrubs that exhibit nesting bird potential, and therefore recommended a preconstruction nesting bird survey prior to ground disturbance activities. Mitigation measures have been added in the Biological Resources section of the study requiring the submission of a nesting bird survey and burrowing owl survey to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a rough grading permit. No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection. b) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential, amend the Development Code land use district from Low (L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOD), and construct a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. With implementation of best practices that have been incorporated into the project and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term and long-term air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of Rev 8-18-14 P341 Initial Study for Design Review DRC2014-00545 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 Page 42 the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). c) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low (L) Residential to High (H) Residential, amend the Development Code land use district from Low (L) Residential District to High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOZD), and construct a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, 3-story, senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land. Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study finds that all categories of potential impacts, including those that have the potential to directly or indirectly affect humans such as air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise, will be mitigated to a less than significant level in all categories. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (✓) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (✓) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (1) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) TECHNICAL APPENDICES (1) Environmental Site Assessment (LOR Geotechnical Group, January 10, 2014) (1) Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation (LOR Geotechnical Group, January 16, 2014) (✓) Air Quality Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, May 27, 2014) (✓) Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Urban Crossroads, May 27, 2014) (✓) Noise Impact Analysis (Urban Crossroads, May 29 2014) (✓) Historic Resource Assessment (Leslie Neumann, June 18, 2014) Rev 8-18-14 P342 Initial Study for Design Review DRC2014-00545 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 Page 43 (/) Water Quality Management Plan (Encompass Associates, August 4, 2014) (/) Arborist Report (Glenn Lukos Associates, February 27, 2015) Rev 8-18-14 • P343 Initial Study for Design Review DRC2014-00545 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546,Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 Page 44 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant e •nmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: 1 n Date: 5/ I I To � Print Name and Title: o Co-��e j C tAL-G- tecJ JS•tSvt r,, Rev 8-18-14 • P344 �"' ; +v City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING ' .., ' PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2014-00545 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components—This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management—The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures—The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga — Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P345 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2014-00545 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner, or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner, or responsible City department, will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • a) P346 U i_ c O 03 a c E O 0 co o 7 C• V -a- CO Z N a N N N N C . a) C . w m • d o > O c I— `o ° , - v 2 ' U .0 2 > a 0 0 a U o I— L co 2 C C CO C C N fa la 19 o J co - w c a a a a a V N O '. o O o O o O) N- C_ w 0 a) 00)) ) a) z C .` E y - a) > > N N v U Q .- > s d' CL d' Ce• Cl) O. m V C > d a C V Q p 'c c O o = w U 'c 0 I U CO CD a (7 y m Z c a o • C y 1hi as as as a O N C 0 0 N .c = C N N 0) LI 0 — O 0) C W 0) C 0 W c o 'O ' a) . 0) . 0 ' .O d O )a C a) V O N. C O aI C O n c o a E 3 c >.Y o0 c o N .� n c . � � . t o 3 g0 5 ::. dO ay --° a�i n � L Eao ` " E `o Q cc ' 0 ,-, i.,-,‘ 60 -` 3 y � c oyCO � 0 .0 <1.7 .5> a) 3 c N w V N 0 U C C a O N C c Q j N Jo co=6— m E3mo mc2mmbig m - 0 omEEc � o =o20U 'oc � co CI 4 � m '5 .2 or) c c � oo my C n N 1 0 E 0) o _ 4aa)) '- Jocmy �0a a) 20 u) o _ cEo ,O cUac � N Jo p) 0) O N 0) f: -02a d • E O O O v W cwto � aci0041) d aa '0w Ecv. � c . a) 2 - - - E nu -o O a • -• u! 0 0 — -O 3 U) — o n n OV c (0 "0 '> O 0 0 O) a 0) O j N O c o a) a > c y 2 c d V) .9 o — a) > ' o — C U -0 O L C >, O) a) o o )n a) O' O)'2 0 'p n m (a c 'C L O 0 Z >. . CD n N@ d to L 0) C F O d N U a1 o O'- 0 'aa aso 'm 2 ta_m 803 � > my `o0 o ° EU > N .O % ym ° -o ENC O d A Q a 0 2 C 10 E 2 O 03 c C) OV 0) O J o 0) O ` Q o o N t � L O a V .N- 0) O N Z d a7 O l9 O N _ C � (0 > N a) � >. 2 c ¢. U. m -o $ o o h -O a) 0, p ° o a a3 c o ° d T m 4n U o > U o o) a) v > a v > o a E off oom yJao omamo � N LL O ac) C) '- o U 0 d p= E U a) c a) O . U O) y m o Fo U as .O_ as - -O C 3 - d �' 0 — X X L C o 0 U O L C a C C > — ' . EcF- ¢ o0 `o r0a -o oo -S -oF- o ,' ¢ 2 o a) nE �' 'v) a` -, — m co) o '3c 0 rat O1aLI o O C 2 E CO co r N M V N P347 U ` 5 C O coa c E O 0 'U U co• Z N N N (RI N N O K N To r C a) C a, C C CD 0 C 0 C O ,_ -C 2 > 0 0 0 a s a a a 0 .2 c O N 0 N N N N N N 0) N U m m m m cco m cco m m m c a a a a a a a s a a c tan w 0 O ' O O O O O O O O O O U ma 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 m C w m 0 0 a) N 0 (1) 0 a) a) C d E a o 0 o a) a) a o a a) D R > CC Cr Cr CC CC CC CC CC CC CC 0 CD CU c c v 'c c O m 0 o E cr N 0 2u- 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o) c° O) a ar c ao 0r "' C C O O a2 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL a a a m m m m m 0 0 0 >..c ` ` C fo C C C > 0) N V 0 a) C N w _ a) C a) a) O a7 0) C j y Y y a) C_ C.) a) d 0 0 N ° V o y N g ° N mE E3 3c3 m coiQ - � m °- ° adm � a 20 >� po 0 m ° - c o > c E a) O C N > > y0 C a O E 0 O U N N n- n p0 ti N c U ° ` �. N N O" C N a) E .O w .°C ° i0" w E a 0 a.° N co -° O N C > m = 0 a) (0 a U Q N r N O L a) a) E V E N d V V C O n E .0 7 c _ — =O.. a N N c m > ° O) 0 VU) c a) m N CO .m O > O o -0 O O - O N y vN) N 3 w N ti O o E 0 O co .. a, C m a) a) C) m N N T co a N �. a N O C tC Cr m X O CO p 0 t C •o - N > C _ N - E co D ° a o 'N ° -p d fn c .° o ° 3 > a) E m 12 a rn'm CO E c t 2U ° a) gym = om � `oU NC a) V m c >o a — X ° V = wt m0 NC N � w aN a E U a)Ecoo oco > c Ea o � � oymcw ■ N0D ° c ° 00 = Eo mm cm � m 0 `9 00 a Ui- 0 2E ° ° oNm � ° � 0 � 3 01. - E `° �c .E > 7, alb' as Nd � � mmaUi � ~ a0i Z C U co 7 3 C f0 C N N N L — V 0 coo co > p V a) O N p a n C y > � c c EU u) .= ' - � 7) a`3i ° 5 N L o a Na `m m o) y � O1g > C C) U' 3 0) � >•� � O 7 V O C ` co) _ 2 C U V N C m U _,. d d. C U U 6 a) 0 D a '� Q U ° Q D y 0 C N o _,c a, 2 0 o N m N N c .N N m Lo) a a) cN° c° " ° cai cr)y 0 a L a czCn 0 3d0a) L 2 ; 2 0 o co 0 2 ° a c2 u o aco g Er -0 N 0 0 � � � ° ° c c N y m w 'a Q U a) 12 0 3 c o U 'N N -0 'm o 0 ° y o m C -0 v°)i N V a- y ° 5 O N O p p U t ` L L CO y0 u < 2.-.C p @ a't a s a) p > N a)a .0 a V a 0 c m m C '� 2a8U � Ho3FUL.. C ¢ u) 0O< U) Q0.ce m' ac 'wd 0— aO) axr5a8OvwwaC a ;y a _ Co'a Ea m ° � CO ` r 0 P348 ` C 00 a c E O 0 'U U c to o v a v v v v c d1 Z V d' V 7 N N (RI N N N V) C o C a) tir, @ > D C O 0 -0 V O ,_ L 2 > a Q a Q 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 U o C C C C C O i ` C C @ @ @ C @ @ @ co C ) N a a a a a a a O c '5• A O 0 0 0 O O w O O O O O C C) C)O ) Cr) co d N N 0 0 N E tea) 7 7 7 7 0 V 0 0) a - �� 0 F > 0 0 0 0 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc O/ T C U -1- 'C C r- o a) .- C O N M 2 )i U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o) (0 C11 a O c a_ a _ C C C O O 0.2 0 - 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0: ° m co m oa a) CO Co m m CO CO CN C O C a 0 0 V d 0 ›. @ > 'A @ 0 T co V 17 C 0 N a7 N CO V V L ^2 @ C N C .0 C E ca fa -c 0 = a) C O O to O " O @ V O@ '3n Im0) odmM0 -0mm @c °. v �' 'ym � � � c m E o c ' U — a7 U o d '� '" a, - a co CO) 0 '° '3 2 L E -2 '73 N ° � co oacE mE 0 a a � o E >, 07 0 CO N 0 y @ L O O L a@ E o OI O L Y 7 E via @ a 0 N T U a�ic 3 U � 3 - o (o2 °� 0) - .0O QE ° o0 cCn -C- ID 2 O, 5 a U c N y c a) 00 V L@, N V BOO Ul C 0 7 .O C• 0 N d L@ '3 0 .- C (0 L„ U @ = N c '- L O O @ (n D. - NQ U a a ® 0 -O N U O ` ■ U O) N (/5 o- 111 00 - - 0 a0� = o N `� co a) a w m Y > a`�3 � 3 o c c C E 0 a a) � N O m a) 1-2 0 aU `@ 0 0) 0 N co a`7 `o)V a 000 ) co o `0) o ¢ C c O a y E m c O@ @d c a) = � � a) >- � o > 3 i E m 0 @ d 0ca3 EYmJo @ ?, N CCaE ti 6a ytY . @marSa) any ° w L. i) m " o0 m m@ _ S ycN `o 0 Qom N EE0 c .> acN -, U 0a O)c 057 N = .NN 'N O � w @off h 0 „, 'C ` 0 4,_c 7E, .= O00 0) O.� 3dN CD O)c ' E c O a) 5°3 " C' a 0 U 0 E a7 a m c a = 0 rL C c 343 co .0 L N co U co O O '2 a) L L J a) U a) V N O fl o 0 0 O 0 'n a) a) N o a a) o C � a _ o = c LwN 0 0- EO .> co act � o 00 N � V v o 0 a o 0 ¢ a' E > @2 > .- 0Y -00 > > 2@ E a7 a) ° C co ° N a-O C N a ° 0 10 0 0 0 5 a m@ 0 co c o - a a) > a > E E .J u, a s @ ¢ E O co O .• a 0 co O — N M ▪ E m N J N N N N N N N o P349 C O !9 co• E O 0 'a U c cco o 0.3 c, ca ce) ch cn co Z V N N N N N (� N 10 w C 0 • 0 'c- .. O m > G C O o a0 o ._ L.my 0 N N N N N N N C C C C C C C m CO m CO CO CO CO 0 a a a a a a a .- 0 0 r. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0_ w d ai CD CD a) ai a) E `p a' 'm d a' aa, as aa) I- > a a x a a a a co O V 'C C r o 7 O C O m V 2 ii U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) N O- m a p C 71 N C C O O o.2 o cc w 0 0 a 0 a 0 a a m - 're-1; - L C- L O m > - o m ° N O Y m <D 3 N W e L < o C c `° N°i D L N L . a '?� L O o L to U a 0 CO O L O -o co a) N N N N CO N -S. C CO 0. C N > n m N O p N co O 0 N O C N C '5 7 toil a) C p O a O p a m 7 m a O` m a N to p � -c cc o = C ° = c c � � c � m OD 3 9 a J E ° V y ° a o N L to U To C U ° ° J L p N U ._ m U co w 0 ` C w L - a a) a ° p a) a) "E. w o 1- t - ° N ° O m m N -.. 2 N O J N p U O aj O .N .N L p N = C N " U fn Q' m C '° °-- 2 m U U v U c v' 0 �[ a N L N m L CO - p C p L_ N N .N C w d a 0 2 "O a) . U (9 . '° y w p p a) 'O a) 0 .2- ?i ` C N O m � c E c E ° ENS a' cn0)r Em0 EaN cay0povo — m o � °. om Eom Ec,� ' oa _ EL'0y EL-I — o J O) c U p mai U ° o 8 c U C y CO V c -' J T9 U C N C p to m j c m N �C ac p 2 E o� m e oio c o o a-E ° - c ° E d . p. O 0 m E m ca m p L p _ m 3 N N 0) U O a) CA O y U a) 0 N p O N (, a To 0 J m ^ N N '° a) L c > m C N cp 2 C N ai O) CO C N it C a« N in O J 7 in ° p Y p p L N a) 7 y o n) - p 2c � o .nooc ac 7E � `-' JEo 'S3 O- J °cal � F3 3 ° � °)N -0n � o O C C N C 0) E C- °) 01"_ O L 0 C O '- P N 0 0 J N p -p C U CO C ° V o p .i V o c a2 ° Q -o < tnna o < too o Qa am Qa 3 < 0Qm' 2 n3 .5 o- :. a ._ E N n ° o) C')SI C') r') a) P350 U L C O ° C. c E O o , 'e) V mc o , v in w • ' cam N CI N i0 V_ -O 'C d V V I A C o 2 O ,_V 2 > `m o a °a I o 0 C ft aa)) aa) cu v 0 o E m LO 0 2LL " m m 0 0 0) m a d C , o y :. c c - O. 0 0 K w , a a a a co M a7 O N N a) `5 N O -O co a) C O a) ' a) a) aJ goal C N `) - 3 S) o o -o e f0 0 - c O a o `:-C o .0 ac) "m f m y n En o o@ = _ 7 . ma�i � ccaoYa) 7oc '6Ca 00 � E co 0 y . o oc L o- d C .= U O L j C co m O y O w O — N U c a) O N co ca a.± 7 a 0 CD a0 •-• o -o) m- oc �" yyo a2aa3y _' oa0 n80 op � o E N n o N N U in c N CO E `,C 0 ') co y co U t/1 C = r0 E .L" N 0 C) 0 O co V L y -O O)O O O N OI O o N O �0 d 0) l9 O O a) U 3 w C _ N N O C C a) _ N O .O CO .n a .. c .a co p -O M O N -5 O W - N O)-O > ) N L N O N U <O C a) U p C O •9U E C > o c L L ._ N O C O O L co 0 (0 22 L al i l0 CO O O O @- N N y N t O) O a) n 0 c c C) y co C L N • O -O , a a) ' a) 0O- _ L. 0) .t6 U C C > .5 ,TL > 0 3 Safi O (D T-O O a) c0 >' a ap) O Q Co OL.. 0 N w a) j C O aS a) T L O)n o' E -a) >_ a) 0 3 -0 N o N O)N -OO N Q. U a) c= 2 > U N O `� a) y Z C cc C > m N N O "NO 0 0 = Z O C co w U cn 'co) :" N U U m N O -N N N N - E O CO N N .c ,.., - 0c w p c LL p c m v a) o c m L .- a) U N 0' y N a cn L L o) N Cr) y 0 N 0) c p 3 -- 3 rn— E = O ri _ O E V .0 o p Rao. N -o m ,..0 -0 o Efl c c aci o co i N E .'w_� m� o)cc - 7t a-a)) 3 o a) in N O) 9t 2 c d c Cm m m Nw � m °' C m 0 O N w O 0 C O -. C E .c 0 @ 3' C O O C a L CO 2 . cg E am c p . a) a a 3r 3 TTU' ac o CLC 0 0- 0 c c Map o Cc `o_ ° ° o- mo COCD > 3o $ c 0701-L001 coo CO W owo `mU oa Cr a) a) ) o > 0a) LOoNaaa)) a ° a a) Z )- )n 0o > a0c- c Y o E o m o > > > c a) a Q c a c � O m . L v c m cr 0 5 •1 d p d mom N N p a) -o a) l73 o 0 V atj 8. 0 P351 C O 0 n. co• E O 0 '0 U c A O C g- (0 z ca v v 0 To -0 'c a) c - o O a) of > G c o •°- a A O .(o - 7..5 >° a °a °a °a 0 C a a a a a o 0 2 2 O O .� O 0 0 0 O O O C r: a) a) C y a) a) a) C C o c C r • 0 `0 0 Co 0 0 2 LL 0 m 0 m m 0) 0 0 a O c as yr C C O O of m a) � ° as a 0- as as :Ea L... L d N N N r N y N a7 U y ° ° O O L m c a) y 0 0) ° 3 2 ' co C 'T N . 0 w . C C O C .o 1- c O .v a,^ C to O 3 a C O n,.; �f y m CO 0 0) °- $ a N O CO a7 N ` N C (a >.C O ,- O N 0 • na a) c 000 2caa 000) 1 aa) � Na'ii.` c � E °_ � E -o 0 •Dc m .N (. .com= O C .00 _La •. a _ oo '° `o ° o c -p iii $ c o -- a 20 0 , >° a w a a t , E p3 ° ENOEt) r coo o E n O C o Q N a) `p 0) t C y O o rnCnm ° o ._ oL . cn a 0 (0 o O 0oE ^ c E E oco no c ° 03c v .°° 3 `om ,- ° c a'c @ ° 2 _ 0 O ao) a) N 0c Om aa0) � co (0ocpo t array « O ° -° Ea o00 ) `° ' E CO (0 L. C t0) C ` C co C).u1 mw y C o o o 2 C - 0 o > o O 0 E o .r c° w E O) .0 3 0 EcE °)� IQE :E0oc `po o., oa) moc aci cn= oa _m° Em3 -°o ° E 0 T5 0 0 C L mN a) car > d (0 N O C U U ° a) o O) (D a) w in E p a) °) O C p .E ea me o0o j � '� QONLO0a ocO � Eo 00 o � LyELa° °) aE a) 0 '— )c co 0 0 O 0 a) E C C C o _ O) CO V6 N `n N Y LO.. d d L au1D > o0 0NCQ70a°) o) oc oo � ou73a � O10 -'" CDOn - � � 0..3 1° a Ov0 oc `m ° W `� 0E 'Eat 't (° 'ct9 -= mE > � o19ayo0 ° 00 r CC y O � o '� y � ac058.= au, c acoasi o ` oL a o)-0 w omco , -8 2_,0, 2 . 0 O > > o w t c o o ° 'c o > . 2 a o E Om c = E 0c N c c .E C a- a (`a u_ (.0 o O ° c 0 � co a E .c E O ,_ m c o a m a;c ,j 00) ° 3 co o 2 2 E Q o ° • • • p c o 0 o ° N p °) (a a s a) • tlf CD 4) wo � omaa52acton a o. 2- E N P352 U L c o w a c E O 0 , 'v U c C . co O V) 2 • M M c{ K 7 V cn O r 'O C . CV w a) ▪ v a) 7 C C p A o U L N• m ❑ I C C O O iicn II : _❑ ° m a a . • - (0 L a) G) ' w '0 ` O >. O 1D C c ❑ N N N "145 C o • >,= 2 t c L c '- N a, a1 c L a) co O a) c d ca a ct a) N .o co > maa) rccc > Eaoo � a�Viom 0Oyoc y > � E `m 3a � a) c C a) a) a) V OV c o U a' O E Q y M a 2] Cf T a) N .-C c j c coo o O co a) to Q C `O U d d O CO N V U m U E E E a) > a ) � a `) mE � a c9c 2o • CO .0 .— cc ca0 = u 0. al Y .3 L `� c .V m e c U ,� t 3 - m a co c a CO E N (a Lo ` m — C E LUa Lco aiE c0 SJ co a) c a) a) C o) C • c') .o Q m 't m > y ; o ? g m m o o a. ` L iro D .- ° 0 a0 -- cal c a~ a2 •CO 0 CD cri o) UQ 7, 0 a, _ E 'o a) N U N a) E N cn :5 2 t . ro co co c) '- 0 >. '0 c - C) ' E -0 E rO c .c N d .N m a) CV � `o :� uao) d J E _ me co'E—24z y ! o @a m - y — U c O .E C) M a) =p - U y (o L , .O' - U >,..c_ O) U o 0 c C O O s• y c � a y - a a) c = >. o CU -0 E (c U co a m-a 5 0 —0 .0— a a, cm O % - - c y 0 O O O -CO T 6 O p C T . n CO C OC A' - a^ a) -0 a .• a1 0 c c N co E m 'O 300 _0 Tic ` cv .0 N O a) `o E m 0Q) -ac 0 L ,C m c -C y a 0 U V C C a) m O c co a`oio+ `n � oc)7cec � E a'moam � ccOiVEL m a) ado3a a) md @ �� 6" dc m ❑ E c a) a) L '5 co O O to a) c a a U c Draw U �- -- - ry U N O o O a) t- C1 O U_ 0 ccwa) cnA '5EU � _ -5 a22 � 2 cOUcnmco I c? - U c co o, c 0 ECJ i E 47 e o s o 1- con m s a w U-ash» o) 0 s aa)) UCO a o E m N M 7 a P353 C 0 0 - a c E O 0 1-1 (-2 c• O 0 2 • . V V V N N a) .Y V C a) w O a7 co C C O t o O ._ L '.- 5 5 m > Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o U U U o U U • 2 ` 2 2 ` 2 2 C V) N y y N y N C �'� 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) w - C C C C C C C ` . F > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co o u •C r C . r O 7 i C 0 CO O 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o a ) . co a) ; a N C To' to y t C C O 0 O.M co cc .• 2 m 0 m CO CO CO m CO (� a) C N 0) CO co U C N V O `) a) -O 0 a) C (5 a) a) co V T V .O 2 _ L. � O C C N 0 2 E 2 O _c o n a) n 0 t _0 a a C -0 C Eia 0 u, ? � mNCa TD E - 1 o - : (� - O '0a) 0oa V o c m n a a 2a E � aaC ro r L i,EV c 2a2 rnya - c c y . o 0a a nin _ "' o O Eo a 0 O > C L 3 a) 3 T C a) N co 0 CO co 0 w A T U co 0 S LEcnu a 000 _ a) o a'0 -0 Ca `o- � � 0 0O m d to t 'co c 3 a`) n c m o V .( a 3 c c `0 a) ti cOi j O E o w c C o)Q. mE cE U. �'t= 3 � o � `� m � �o � o OO � O co) O 0) co ',� a� ° m a= yV co Cn T o a) 0 . ti- Vc 0 '� - O c�0-- C o '0 E o on o OE00 O ' ain1 .6 2ct is o as E 0 �' C � `) ai o 0 a`�i a0. 0 a) al w a 0 C 0 E '- co d O O 0 O � 8 `m o) .- O EcOO .� oo) " � L � c mEOOO > Zc 20 N ti ;, ,ca0oT N oaOya) o. a„ 0 O F- V g ` 3 3. > j E , o 5s c y o o .c 0 ° c `o m � C —° '5• 13 o � c:: � E0 ° m= 10N ` OL00 1; CO (2 aaia`) c = O � m CVC .'C1V ca yaa o ° D aOi. c .42. C63O > c ° �c � j ° � rc_ CD o3 m ° o 2O .5 = S O 0) O O o (ry: c 0 0) a) 3 )e 0 o O E ) .c 0 " E c c 0 o O 4) °a O o 0 .0 .0 V D. 1 a) a N y co c 0 V) o "a O c 0 U E 0 c y N ,-- y 7 N 0 C 0 0 0 fa ; c O .u) o O O o• O c i N o .O 0 ` 0 O N .� c O -0 a a) - c c o m co co IE ccaa)i c mo Hcaaa)) v° Emm H ° ccu0 'aEE I- -c ¢ Saci Uc EFo8 -.710z 2 0ay -c E3 0)? O E h• ti � E `z r!J 0 W E v u� co 0 W 0 P354 C 0 i0 — a c E O 0 45 '2 c co 0 • N Z N N N To r '0 C O F CO O CO C O• '02 ... a V O ,_ L w d 'C 2 > 0 0 c c 0 0 U U J ` • C C C 0 io o U c « U m m E . _ c i= > 0 0 C o a V. C O O w rn E 0 2 LL Q Q 0) co 0) d d c a C N .. c C O 0 0.2 0 '- 0 0 cc .2 m co la -0 a CO 0! C O -0000) Ol— O >.-° N O C (9 O 0 C y C CO O` °O N 0 'O C c "a N .0 c N N `° C N p a) N C 0 ? a) U a7 'D. N O co N O V C O ° U = a 0 W j U N C 0 co C C C ._ U C c U 0 v C N N U z -a N N a] al (o O a7 O U C a) ' a) U N C N U N ` O. O 'NO CO CSC a) › .- 03 'Co N •E J � 3 0 Ica c w 00 ua' 0 - me m 3 c 01 E y a) N .N CO L O O U N — CO 47 o O ` a°i en c°� a) o c -a -v —°-' 2. c `ma) c D a) .>_ a� `- x aa) c c C am c m a) o miU .0 ° ca -°v 3 c o m 5 -c o •- vi o t= a co .d c N tt- 2O • O L 7 N �_ m .. > U NL' W L. .a7 0.1 N m _ N y avi o c rn x V 3 .c -a • c o Er_ a) 3 " a) c � — m N '- 01 L C (>>o J O al C G °��_ '� m m C o U _ O _�.. L O C N 3 > ° GS --= y ca V L O • Z -a - � co W aa) cca - c v m m -° if) m E ° 2m cmc m ur ° = o c 'c N = > ° = ° m a- 3 . 3Nwo o' 0 CO c) ° C p N •a) c a O U L N (D `o E O CO 3 c c C 0 U O CO ° _0 a) O .`-- � n a� _ ° 5 a) ,_ cDNa) co N °' c oo ° aa ococ 1, cwa' mUC3 aOimE mom � `oah° .a ,C3 v � � m0 o0 c61° 3 a° a) Ecv a) L_ c `—a u)— aToc .0 2C CC_ U E . .cg. gm ,1 , 0 > `" mrn= c .t •-• 00 ! 3c � Oc (0v5 O cc0 'y'� 0 c c3a� JN cN ca co moo O a) O> a> > u d m a) .a E 0c0 S • • • • • • • C. in « • • • • CI)_ 'a. a . P355 a) .... ,_ c ••f. 2 = co 72- c E O 0 it) as ....I 4, c ■- .4.„ ØZ CV CA . CU ,.‘ ...7. .. •-■ .. 1.) C CD .r... 43 CO 44 > 0 0 '7 ..,. C 5'1' t .2 -o tos O S .s.44 .0 .1r: r.\ .4 0 0 0 0 ,I. -)i 0 v '', CO 0 (0 (0 c c C C C co , . a3 co co co c a :ii' a a a a .... 0 0 :C. .-0" 115 15 " 4-• 5 o co 0° 3 3 3 3 3 a) .o .a.) .to o _ 5 5 5 - > E .03: > a) 1 ia) a) 0 0 ia. > CC 13 W CY CC CC 0 >. cc .1.L 't r .1: C O a) ..:,.... 0 1.60 r 7 0 0 0 0 O 0 :14 a -(-_-) .,-- a) o) ,1 • cc; Ct. o) O 5 id c -;•4. a o cc O 0 :41. a 2 ... CD • L. Ili , .., 0 0 0 0 CL 42 0 .4,e CO CO CO 03 F 0j c o () o) • )•• :-= so c 1;5 a.) 0) c i--0 0 a 2 co a) C1)7,-._ .0 -0 0 t 7-r- b ° cn 0 E ui E 0 .0 0):a ,C ".: 2 - .° CD n .C. 'CI] a) ....CD :., --C2 CO :C -Cr! .0 if) mC -C § E ° o • 4\-- £- 2 0 c3 ...:, i) Th- .a. CI° -- 7 - ,.. c - 0 1- s E - -0 :..... 74-..- ..c - r, o.•= 0 `. -0 a a) R e 0 0 ..,.7, 0 1 ej c 0 CT) .IC.5 C C_1 ill "rn t -•-• "C1 `-' > 0)-c E • o E 0 o Q) N (..) 0 -o )- cp 0 o = ul "b. c 0 Eulca) ° Ea) c0 ,..- 71 ,- a) 0 -45-...-- a) cn z 0 2 -0 ....- •,„ )- 1 c 10 0 " . r 0 a ,,=>,ry z -0 ti ift a.) iz-• •-- .- a) .- -- a) 0 c.) a• .- (D E 8 -0 ._ ;5 5 F •- cfc 0 -0 n ,... '- a c 0 -0 0 E _0 .- a) .- 2:: 2i cl, , E c n3 a, r2 2, .i.. --,., co Eu.. — !s= E 0.0 , - u, 0 wa, - -0 c " — a 0, ,C4 117r -C3 r' .- CO ° D -CO. -0 .- 0 0) 0 ° Xca) CD .-CEW r CO 0 > x (.0 Tv. E --,-4-- - _ c 0 o) .0 a.) 0 a, • 2 Jo 0 -0 121 c 0 c 7": 'a r .5. '- n. -5 a)"a' 77 C 0 72 1° C wa 0 a•-• C "0 15 co >'• = " La E 0 CD 0 0 CO 0 > 0 C .- (I) 1-; CO 0 .2.'..e .1c '.'• ° C76 ' `3 C C TO 0 4= C 0 1- e 2 ma' >. 6 °' c 0 co , _ i., c to n„,_ to ro 2 _• °3 2. 72 2,-..s ._E 0= i 2,A 3 lia ‘,i 2, € 0) a_ — ai 0 a, X O 4-* t_ '0 0 C TO! i5 •-• 1- .2 ° 735 76 •• u - -0 , c = o c ' E ° ''' 2 _. 2 .1 al -oj 0E 0) 0 c a 0 '3 ,- a c E c o) --- 0 0 E 0 >, .0•,_ 0, Ecaoc.) 2T, E c ..5. o -SE re; cD cv 0 CD = 6 4„ ° •2 a) CD 43 c. — -C1 0-./.5 -,a.- .- -5 i5 ._ - m 0 (.73 .E c >, ci - 7, 0 2 E C li ° . o -° O c ra 7-) CD CO 0 r >, 01 ° W E " "":' 'r c 0 -0 E I- ..c Is •E .C,72 1---- 1': 0 0 0) 'it' C E'2 tj -c 0 o 3 0 :0 a CO 0 CD "512 C -- 0 r I_ ... o 5 >-. 0 .cc 0.'. c•- 03 ct a •-• a, as 0 0 °I 0 (1.) a ,-- m c = c ",' -0 a ,- .c , r, e" fc) 0E0E - mgc"" t cl) Tii 5 tv' Q c 0 •-• C 0-..... . 1- CO 1.0 < u3 8 -0 El.i- 2 -0 co c w 1° co co E to 8 2 c 2 '- a.) tiro 0 2 ° mcn - cc D co o3 74; ..:-..- o 5_ a c c pa) c' 7, c -2 co E to .0- tow a)" ao -, .c 00 'cn- 2 E .r_ tic > n a9 0 0 a) co al 2 co az,: .c. co. a ra' °I co cp ›.. c T.; - 00 :•= 211 xocucCa) cnozco2e = i- t E rt 3 b 07— ED 0 ___ z E a - cn 0 .- F.? .1- P356 h. C o !? a co• E O 0 U . c m o v o c VI Z N N N N To r C a) C • N w m m r > D C O o U • O L '�,_ 2 > a 0 0 N N N C C C C m m co w O ° a O O '� O 0 0 C w N N N 41 a) N N C 0 V Cv- 8, 0 O E 0' 0 0 0 o m U U U 2 u. m m m N m m a' 0_ O c a `• o C C O O a2 m 0 IX (c CO m m rO 0 a C 0 � 0 N C N a rO 0 0 (0 O m E 0 0 a) Q c N O C a) 0 3 >. y d a N a) 0) m = C m C C co _c a) Y Q) 2 E 10 `m E E .c° 4(1 E N ao m 0 d ma . czic o j m m O) O N m m m O N y O N y v > m C_ (3 C a) c O m C O w m c N by yc mO � c 'nmuTi � 7ccC°) yEON 'E � EaN > jaa)iEoom 0 ga ? m 2 ¢ -75 a-C ( Lmmo -' awmv° 0oEO N � � C 6 a) >. N °O.V a) > N O.-a N m Q O L 0 > C N y m p C y C a) t-- E .- 2. E • E '- aO E • ° 00 E co ° c d " cU m a � E N , 'y E m CD 16 E a) a� aa0 ' 17) V E00 17) - cN �Omym > no ri - t-39- E0011) 0 >- CD6—. ..- 15 70 - `OU) c - co m ._ CdO � - E � la � 07 o aE - °. C _ N III c a co C a) N N a N a 7 0 a) E , 0 O co U 2a ° mm o @ mm c- cEL2 aO `o - Om0- vS. c °) � 7 0 V y S y N L ?) d C C N N C 0 = c > E ) c 0 N c Tx 0 Z C N C 0 0 Q O co D C m C T a) O 4,1• 04-,,, CE w co a � -OO V a 00- y � 0ocaa)) ac C) 0 ° rya.=_ m � � � oNL � L_ cL -a a CD -F, 00 ,,‘ E a N0E rn `oN � mrno . m 7mmOaioim ~ m3 � m 7 O V y 0 O c m C 7 c O C m C 7 a) N N E N L C C N Q C 7 N N •'- a O O '— a O C a= T a) E N N N W . m 7 la N CO 0m '° > -0Oc.VE .0 > POv.UE am` L0ao) am) ma ° " OCJoEa cEO C (co o °. N ` m O ,..= a N ` m U _ N N 3 N c T m .3 O C N d 0 m a) 0.>. O N `r 7 ,_. .- 7 N ° N N 0 -0 0 3 C r V > w_ 7,1 p 7 N 0 oaci > oa�i porn= o = o 0500Ca) Co 'ram) m � � > m Q ° aaD> ac) mOm2ca>) O .5 E N U -o f- d U () F- a u. Q U ∎ J U w N N CO .0 O N o) [) d m m V� L... L... a io °U Q w °-' a := a `m m re a ro n 0 P357 c O so y 71- c E 0 U V 0 . cc 0 o O V V V' • C -a- m Z N N N N N N V) Co V_ 'C 'C d ao W d > O c 0 O V U 0 L F._ g > a a a a a o C C C C C C CO C as co co l0 CO CO C a n a H o a ,- o O .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ma 3 3 3 3 3 3 .0 a a) o 0 0 E 'm o ' > > > > f- > Cr CC CC EC Cl) CO c t C _0 0 O C S� CNI N- O a)) 0 LL m to m m m m 01 co rn 11 O C •N C ri c c O 0 o ct) g m m 0 0 0 0 wcc2 C.)) yam_C .5 o E u) y a) O (0 .a m - 0 0 co di 773- L CO T y N o a) 0 = a) o Th. E � ocq � � mmmc cy 00 0 7m3E � c .V) `m oogN ' L c �O � Eo � m � mo (7 aa °3' � � a�� Oaai � � � m ok9tg m �_ a a. L U 0) > O L Q d y0 y - 0,- y y 0 3 0 0 > > 0 2 0 L O m o o 0 o m o E a) y ` ° _c o u) o c a4 (..) 1- u, m w E oc)p ` m o - ?- c T o 2 `I o aj c y 3 o cw r o. e rn19 C m o a rno a E Or o o o m C U U o L-' Z '� Z >`- a o U .m y o N a m ` O L N -0 U y = 0 0) —c y T c E D_ o .° x o — mo o 0 o c °) c C m 0 o a C m (0 D C '0 (13> yr= E aD > m V) 3 a7 O O L m a) m 1] L o V1 C O O D L O .N U -co E O N - C c y .y C o a) y a m O) 0y Ca) 11) ,00 c Cy ca3 000mrw oalw 0 0 _, ov ° o w Z or3 _ EW cL45 E m0o@a�iaci COcamomaE co) 0o o `'' - 0L y C U y T a O` -'0 '0 N N (0 a C E V 0 - 'o O O C C CO C 0 0 7 V m C E 0) 0"" y c0 y �O 0 a 4]. 0 E N L O .fl- O o `o -F. U a) T° j y0 , a) f0 `ti Q t>0 .`.. a) cyaawoo00 ? � m o ; g 'o_ _co .. H 0ao) o a woo3003ymy -O occEa0 2 C O -Oa. <0 E a O N co .• N . z 0 ` m C N p m L ` >,N 'p U 1 ,N o N 0 o ° o m O c 1 ' > > rna o o y o 0 cc om0Zy � e.'" n `pc yyocoa � c ya'y amiaa _a0 � ayov) cy 0 co L Z 0 >, m 0 N > 0 0 ° o o a o O 0 J a) 0 O 0 L 0 a) a) L 0 N m di 'o U N N tides -- V) Uo yoU j: .a loam c b � aa ° H o -o - H cu cu) ma1L- 2Unm V y CD i E N Iin C .- N M 7 to 0 P358 L. C o co a c E O 0 I-3 U a a a 0z a •a- N To C d - W N V d 0 C 0 O O 0 .c M• > Q a 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 C 0 0 0 C C C co co N N a) CO CO N C a ' a a a a a a a ,.. 0 O 'o a O O a O O O O CO 0 w .d aa) ai a) a) a) o a3) pc cn C V' - 'C C o▪ 7 O 0 0 0 O M o d U U U 0 0 U U 2 u. 0 m m m m m m m N m m o) Cl y c a `o N C C O O Q ofm N ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C' w d m m it m it it it Lei � � o °c) � � n � cLQ: aa � ar � � o �cc�iEc � � mm > � aNi ,N >' N - O - C O "O N N N L O 'r 0 to 0 N N Tp a) N w a) ° co a7 O 0 U N _o 0 d d m _ - N U U E C C 0) N .- N - 3 0 N N O 0 Cl N ° Q yO N To- o "O N Y C. N - O �.N a)co O) - O N C w C U d c O .O (p O a) L_ ° � v ° 0 - 0 a) d 4- m � a-oi m •y o c_ cn o° a r °' N �' o o � >'-`°o > a •• > >. o� 0 0 L > Yca (o 3m 2 `o Nm � 3E .- odmoc cf0 � o °) N .- O � a) 14 N O N c 0) a) N in 'O (o o N d O L Cr.. ° E z L co a) 3 > C) O co O OO L N C O L `° 0 N ° .N ' U � O U a a) . a o co N N N . oy T:3-) aNQ _ .o cop, ON -00 .caoEoLE NE2f.. 0pcoc o 'O - E o mc N o).a E is f0 E v 0 i- L - `° 0 ° -a 3 ° ° (O O 0)° O)° C (Q a°) >. O C c C j c0 -5 T E4— y 0 O° d CL 3 y T O a) E c c — _c c 5 aO � c - c cO y d m 2 pc O U N 2 N N E O cn N ••- 3 _Y CO U E O .0 (0 N ... y 'O a) a) 0 0 m E N U N N i) -o E O U • co z C O a •T - n1 E C E O O U 0 7 N N -O o X N m > w 3 0 2 a) °i > C O ca ° a. a(° `1 0 '- 0 ° N c a) -o U ,C m N d-Vi N N d L ° 0 N 0 d 0 - 0 U C c co O o V ` 'o c N >' ` d '._ N L. ° - °) C o c C 3 o d.N.. N N -° r N cmo. co Q c O y N U .o ° a1 ° 'L" -O a) a) co O ' C E •- , 0 , 0 >. , , -cc —O - OL.. lD .o y coma) I� 03 co co to C U c°"--0 ° �_ L _ C X d 2 N d C 0 E N O)L U U L 0 -0 = 0 , al C E V p j U Q C N _ _ m d w N cc C .- a) ._ a y a) O y a) N N .. 0 og EoE , 3 ___4- ) LmL = aE °oo ` a) c'LiEoa ° m 0 _ c a = c33ocx > 0oc N O) O N L a a 0 ° a) C E o )a a) a) E O y co m l cp, '.- o Q 3 N V co Q N L. 3 L 3 Q` N �e m N E Q U N 3 U a a '.. 0 d E E E v) co E m W R. co Fri o P359 �0 f as c • a a a C E c c J O O iL a O c• c ., c m a o CO o V o 0 o C/3 Z N A s a c w 0 o` a -.. •o ' d 10 o O o a I- K U' 0 .E y y � c'' 0 0 0 3 oc x c tic O' t c L ._•V' « L L O N d > o cc333NmmU o N a7 O V) co r.... C O C • ca o 0 a L d d U U m 2 > a a 0 a c n C) ao lIlt a a o o n a3i m > s u o co (f) E m > > a a < m P > Q VU m O C m c d 0 o o a n c o v •cc 2( a mcio r- �0. = • . 0 E Cr a v O 11.1 5 u- U x, c 0 a0 ° E 0 C CD 01 Si O 0 N CL co C C1, > O 2 ` 0' m a O 0. c C E m y U 4 O O O V � Z 0 j a) N CO C o U L E m O.- m w ~ D 0 co Q• w O IL .g." U 6 70 C1 "_' C 0 0 0 0 Q V 0 T T O) 0 0 C yr) 0 O. , , H O O I : iitnu y O L N 0 U E 0 O c L - co 0 0 0m 2: Q m U O w 0 co a J C J 2 ao occo0 N 0 M O L 0 0 V(pc — N 0 — V o 9O O y 0) (o o 0 , m 0 :6 in 0 0 0 0 —O u! O 0 N N O V J 0 ._ L u! '> N 0);:= to 1] O •_ 0 ... E U c o C 0 (o > 2 .T. 0 — N C 1 (9 0 V N 0 CO C 0•� r 0 h E � N ` ., N o 0 C N 0 L d - a to C to N c .0 — n' 0 o J L O .o E 0 0 0 c rp N co Y 0. O C 0 co c U co N 0 E N U C O - to' m 0 0) m 7 "1-. t5 C) 00 N I' - O c . > - 4- ... T 2 N a L w r c .0 3 C a) C t O T [0 N CO J 3 o) ' O c as as `n O 220 .<o U N a - U L iI — p O_ N U 0 c U as .D 3 V L iil 4- u) = 4 0 0 O O 0 JO yo a) YL U) 0 N .. N m. O O O 6 c ft 2 C O CO 0) o m y N T 0 N O c 0 `O a C) O J -o Y 0 c U c p n 0 s- o • c c >, wa 0 O ,o > — o.0 a `m a) 3 aV " o r E w 0 a' E ca °I mU d O mmc y omE = 00 D3 aa �5 -o > oc 92 LmEcccdL «, O J o r .J L L o (o -co co N c E V o c 0 0 o m V c' O 0 V 9 U U � E EOmc mcoti0t H0 Sa0r. Q30V VF- -c0 O O U m J o g Of a r a ' a U m d it .. E t >. 0 0 0 o w 0 0 0 Y et 00- 0030_ 31- P360 RESOLUTION NO. 15-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2015-00275, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 14 TREES, INCLUDING 3 HERITAGE TREES, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 24,641 SQUARE FOOT, 60-UNIT, THREE-STORY SENIOR APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 2.25 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HIGH (H) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, 7418 Archibald, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit No. DRC2015-00275, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of May 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on May 13, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road. Said property is currently designated as Low Residential; and b. The project site is approximately 612 feet from east to west and 160 feet from north to south and is presently improved with a single-family residence; and c. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated High Residential and developed with an existing senior housing apartment complex (Villa Pacifica) and Office and developed with the Archibald Library. The properties to the west are designated Low Residential and are developed with single-family residences. The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is developed with the First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga; and d. The related Design Review application (DRC2014-00545) is a request to develop a 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land in the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-38 P361 TRP DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 2 High (H) Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road; and e. The trees are not designated as historically significant; and f. The trees are not noted in any Specific Plan/Community Plan or condition of approval; and g. The applicant has submitted an arborist report assessing the health of the individual trees. The applicant submitted an Arborist Report, prepared by Glenn Lukos Associates, February 27, 2015, which identifies that although the three (3) heritage trees are healthy, their location conflicts with the proposed building and associated site improvements, the trees are not suitable for preservation, and their removal will allow for the economic enjoyment of the property. The landscape plan demonstrates the three (3) heritage trees removed as part of this project will be replaced in kind with a minimum of three (3) 24-inch box size trees; and h. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to construct improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the property; and i. There are a variety of existing healthy trees in the neighborhood; the removal does not affect the established character of the area and the property values; and j. It is not necessary to remove the trees to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way; and k. The trees cannot be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal; and I. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-38 . P362 TRP DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 3 Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) All applicable Conditions of Approval as contained in DRC2014- 00545, shall apply. 2) Section 19.08.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires that all heritage trees be replaced on a one-for-one basis, not less than 15-gallon size. 3) The replacement trees shall be planted on the same lot as the trees that are being removed. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-38 P363 TRP DRC2015-00275 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 4 4) This permit shall be valid for a period of 90 days, unless an extension is requested in writing at least 14 days prior to the expiration date. Where this permit is associated with development, the effective date begins and the 90 days shall start from the date of final map recordation or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •,L‹ Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: . /an Candyce :`rnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MUNOZ • NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: P364 RESOLUTION NO. 15-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00713, A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF A COMBINATION RETAINING AND GARDEN WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET, ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014- 00545 FOR A PROPOSED 24,641 SQUARE FOOT, 60-UNIT, THREE- STORY SENIOR APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 2.25 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD—APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59 A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, 7418 Archibald, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2014-00713 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of May 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 13, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road. Said property is currently designated as Low Residential; and b. The project site is approximately 612 feet from east to west and 160 feet from north to south and is presently improved with a single-family residence; and c. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated High Residential and developed with an existing senior housing apartment complex (Villa Pacifica) and Office and developed with the Archibald Library. The properties to the west are designated Low Residential and are developed with single-family residences. The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is developed with the First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga: and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-37 P365 DRC2014-00713 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 2 d. The proposed project meets or exceeds all Development Code standards. As conditioned, the proposed senior apartment complex will meet all applicable Development Code standards for multiple family residential development. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed wall height increase is necessary due to a grade difference between project site and existing adjacent properties and is consistent with the residential nature of the Development District in which the project site is located. The additional wall height will provide privacy and security between the adjacent yard areas and neighboring project sites; and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses as the project site is within the existing Low(L) Residential District and proposed High (H) Residential District, which will permit the development of multi-family residential structures. Additionally, there are residential development to the north (Villa Pacifica Senior Apartments), west (existing single- family residential), and east across Archibald Avenue (existing single-family residential). Combination retaining and garden wall heights over 6 feet are common where there is a grade difference between project sites and neighboring properties; and c. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. There is an approximate 2-foot grade difference between adjacent properties and the project site, with the property to the west approximately 2 feet higher than the project site and the project site approximately 2 feet higher than the property to the south. The additional wall height along the west property line will allow adjacent residential properties to secure their private yard areas with a minimum 6-foot high wall. The additional wall height along the south property line will allow the applicant to maintain a minimum 6-foot high wall between the adjacent land uses; and d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The approval of a Minor Exception is appropriate for proposed wall height increases within residential districts when there is a minor grade difference between adjacent properties. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-37 P366 DRC2014-00713 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 3 that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the • project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Minor Exception for an increase in the height of combination retaining and garden walls from 6 feet to 8 feet, along the west and south property line of a proposed 24,641 square foot, 60-unit, three-story senior apartment complex on 2.25 acres of land in the High (H) Residential District (24-30 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road -APN: 0208-031-58 and 0208-031-59. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-37 P367 DRC2014-00713 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 4 BY: mil.�_.. (` 1�cti�c�S�" Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: v, . /a, • .� Candyc!Burn---,, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P368 RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545, THE REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 24,641 SQUARE FOOT, 60-UNIT, THREE-STORY SENIOR APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 2.25 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HIGH (H) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (24- 30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (SH), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031- 59. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, 7418 Archibald, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2014-00545, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th of May, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on May 13, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road. Said property is currently designated as Low Residential; and b. The project site is approximately 612 feet from east to west and 160 feet from north to south and is presently improved with a single-family residence; and c. The project was designed to be architecturally compatible with the design of the existing Villa Pacifica complex and also provides a direct vehicle and pedestrian connection between the two related projects. The design of the proposed building has similar building massing and architectural features (i.e., stucco exterior, tile roof, balconies, etc.). The revised architecture includes a stacked stone wainscot and architectural reveals; and d. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated High Residential and developed with an existing senior housing apartment complex (Villa Pacifica) and Office and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P369 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 2 developed with the Archibald Library. The properties to the west are designated Low Residential and are developed with single-family residences. The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is developed with the First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga; and • e. The related General Plan Land Use Map Amendment DRC2014-00546 proposes • to amend the land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre); and f. The related Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 proposes to amend the land use district from the Low (L) Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the High (H) Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH); and g. The related Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275, which proposes the removal of 14 trees whose location conflicts with proposed improvements, including 3 heritage trees including 1 Coast Live Oak and 2 Cork Oak trees. The 3 heritage trees will be replaced in kind with a minimum of three 24-inch box size trees; and h. The related Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, a request to increase the wall height of a combination retaining and garden wall height from 6 feet to-8-feet along the west and south property line. The increased wall height is necessary due to grade differences between the project site and adjacent properties to maintain a minimum 6 foot high perimeter garden wall; and i. The proposed project meets or exceeds all Development Code standards. As conditioned, the proposed senior apartment complex will meet all applicable Development Code standards for multiple family residential development. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P37O DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 3 local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, . this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Design Review DRC2014-00545, Minor Exception DRC2014-00713, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00275 shall be effective upon approval of General Plan Map Amendment DRC2014-00546, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, and Development Agreement DRC2014-00610 by the City Council. 2) The applicant shall permit a member of the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, or their designee, on the project site for Native American Monitoring during any ground disturbance or grading operations of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P371 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 4 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order • to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All construction equipment shall comply with•SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P372 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 5 11) Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. 12) Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. 13) Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. 14) Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. 15) Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. 16) Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 17) Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. 18) Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 19) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 20) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Long Term Project Operational Impacts 21) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 22) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 23) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 24) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 25) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P373 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 6 26) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 27) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 28) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 29) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 30) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 31) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 32) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, . appliances, and water heaters. • 33) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 34) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, a nesting bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P374 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 7 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. 2) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, a Burrowing Owl Survey that conforms to the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P375 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 8 • • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P376 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 9 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) 'Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Lonq Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic- compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P377 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 10 • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel • dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Encompass Associates PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P378 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 11 (August 4, 2014)to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • Post-Construction Operational 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Encompass Associates (August 4, 2014) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P379 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 12 operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' • standards. 3) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 5) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 6) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. Interior 7) All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well fitted, weather- stripped assemblies and shall have a minimum sound transmission class (STC) rating of 27. Air gaps and rattling shall not be permitted. 8) All exterior doors shall be well weather-stripped solid core assemblies at least one and three-fourths inch thick. 9) Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well fitted or caulked plywood of at least one-half inch thick. Ceilings shall be well fitted, well-sealed gypsum board of at least one-half inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. 10) Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use. A forced air circulation system (e.g., air conditioning) shall be provided, which satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Mechanical Code. 11) All bedrooms, when in use, are expected to contain furniture or other materials that absorb sound equivalent to the absorption provided by wall-to-wall carpeting over a conventional pad. 12) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P380 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 13 noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 14) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 15) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CD Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: II A s .* Candycel=urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-36 P381 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00545 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 14 P382 Conditions of Approval RtNCII0.1 Community Development Department Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - ProjectType: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The applicant shall design the project and use to conform to the provisions contained in Development Agreement DRC2014-00610. 2. The applicant shall work with the First Baptist Church located south of the project site to develop a shared driveway access as depicted in the Agreement to Enter Into an Easement Agreement. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent • properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 5. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 6. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5111!2015 P383 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 15-*, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 9. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 10. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 11. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 12. For multi-family residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 13. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: 10 percent - 48-inch box or larger, 10 percent - 36-inch box or larger, 10 percent - 24- inch box or larger, 70 percent- 15-gallon. 16. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www.CityafRC.us Printed:5/11/2015 Page 2 of 14 P384 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, 0RC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and• sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 18. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 19. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 20. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 21. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 23. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 24. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 25. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 26. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for , this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 27. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 28. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 29. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5I11i2015 Page 3 of 14 P385 Project tt: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 31. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 32. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 33. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 34. For multiple-family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 35. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 36. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 37. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for' consistency prior to issuance of any, permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 38. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 39. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/11/2015 Page 4 of 14. P386 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: ' 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval . 41. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Dedicate an additional 5' bringing in right-of-way for Archibald Avenue to 50 feet measured from the street centerline. 2. Provide written agreement with the adjacent south property regarding the proposed reciprocal access easement at the shared driveway and the closure of the existing northerly drive approach of the south property. The agreement shall be recorded prior to issuance of any City Permit. 3. The two separate parcels shall be merged. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial Street" standards including: a. Remove existing curb adjacent sidewalk and reconstruct property line adjacent sidewalk. Match width of and transition to join existing sidewalk at north property line. b. Protect existing curb, gutter and street lights or provide improvements, as required. c. The driveway with median shall have two 20' wide drive aisles separated by a 10' wide median. The median shall not extend into the public right-of-way. d. Remove the existing driveways at the north and south property lines and the existing northerly driveway of the church and repair with curb and gutter. e. Protect or provide additional traffic striping and signage, as required. f Provide curbside drain outlets per City Std. 107-B. 5. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/11/2015 Page 5 of 14 • P387 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 7. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Archibald Avenue 8. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that' in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 9. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Archibald Avenue • Curb& Gutter A.C. Pvmt Sidewalk Drive Approach. Street Lights Street Trees vxnv.CityofRC.us Printed:5/11/2015 Page 6 of 14 P388 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II • Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 11. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed:5/11/2015 www.CityofRC.us n Page 7 of 14 P389 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Archibald Avenue Botanical Name - Platanus acerefolia Common Name - London Plane Tree Min. Grow Space- 7' Spacing -40' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 13. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 14. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 17. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/11/2015 Page B of 14 P390 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. 2. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 3. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 4. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 5. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. 6. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9 3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. 7. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 8. FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. 9. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 10. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. wnw.CityofRC.us Printetl'.5/11/2015 Page 9 of 14 P391 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). 6. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. 7. Provide draft stops in combustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. 8. Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls when required. 9. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 10. Fire resistive construction of the multi-family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 11. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/11/2015 Page 10 of 14 P392 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 13. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 14. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. 15. Project shall comply with the accessibility requirements the current edition of the California Building Code 16. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 17. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 18. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 19. Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for approval. 20. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 21. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). Grading Section • Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will, be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. A copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/11/2015 Page 11 of 14 P393 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 5. On engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 6. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 8. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Archibald Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 9. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 11. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 12. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 13. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 16. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 17. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 18. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/1112015 Page 12 of 14 P394 Project it DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 22. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 23. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 24. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: ,i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 25. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 26. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 27. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 28. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 29. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 30. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. www.CityofRC.us Printed'.5/11/2015 Page 13 of 14 P395 Project#: DRC2014-00545 DRC2014-00546, DRC2014-00547, DRC2015-00275 Project Name: Villa Pacifica II Location: 7418 ARCHIBALD AVE - Project Type: Design Review General Plan Amendment, Tree Removal Permit, Zoning Map Amendment ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 32. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 33. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 34. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/11/2015 Page 14 of 14 P396 RESOLUTION NO. 15-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO APPROVE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2014- 00610, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (SHOD), INCLUDING DEVIATING FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 24,641 SQUARE FOOT, 60-UNIT SENIOR APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 2.25 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, 7418 Archibald, LLC, filed an application for Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Agreement is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of May 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The subject property of the Development Agreement is legally described herein. 4. A true and correct copy of the proposed Development Agreement is attached as Attachment "A" to this Resolution. 5. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the associated Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for said project as described in Section 3 of this resolution. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Commission hereby specifically finds that the Development Agreement and each and every term and provision contained therein conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as proposed to be amended by DRC2014-00546, a request to amend the General Plan land use designation for the subject property from Low to High Residential, and conforms to the Zoning Map of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as proposed to be amended by DRC2014-00547, a request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low (L) Residential District to the High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOD), based on the following findings: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-35 P397 DA DRC2014-00610 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 2 a. The proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, and general land uses specified in the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plans; and b. The proposed Development Agreement is compatible and in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use and zoning practice; and c. The proposed Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City; and d. The proposed Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-35 P398 DA DRC2014-00610 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC . May 13, 2015 Page 3 4. This Commission hereby recommends approval of the Development Agreement attached hereto as Attachment "A" with the special condition which follows: 1) The final draft of the Development Agreement shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Attorney prior to approval by City Council. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c-.,.� G BY!' �: � Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: - -A Imas∎ANA Candyce rnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P399 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2014-00610 SENIOR CITIZENS' HOUSING THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of the Effective Date by and between 7418 ARCHIBALD LLC, a California limited liability company ("Developer"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. California Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. authorizes cities to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. B. California Government Code Section 65915 provides that a city may, by agreement with a developer, grant a density bonus over that allowed by the maximum density established in the development code and land use element of the general plan when a developer agrees to construct housing for low income households. C. Developer has requested City to consider the approval of a development agreement, with a density bonus, pertaining to that real property located entirely within City, the common and legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and hereinafter is referred to as the Site." D. The Developer proposes to construct a senior housing residential project, including low income units, within the City. Said project contemplated by Developer will require an increase in the maximum density as currently provided in the Senior Housing Overlay District. E. It is the desire of City to encourage developments designed to provide affordable rental units for senior residents of the City. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby willing to want a density bonus to Developer as provided by the terms of this Agreement. F. On 2015, City adopted its Ordinance No. approving this Development Agreement with Developer and said action was effective on , 2015. 1 ATTACHMENT A P4OO AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following meaning: a. "40% Income Qualified Tenants" shall mean Qualified Tenants whose annual income does not exceed forty percent (40%) of the Area Median Income. b. "Affordable Rents" shall mean the total charges for rent, utilities, and related services to an Extremely Low Income Qualified Tenant shall not exceed one-twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of Extremely Low Income, adjusted for household size; to a 40% Income Qualified Tenant shall not exceed one-twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of 40% of Area Median, adjusted for household size; and to a Very Low Income Qualified Tenant shall not exceed one-twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of Very Low Income, adjusted for household size. Initial rents for each unit shall be set by the Developer at the time of initial occupancy of the Development. Rents may be adjusted annually by the same percentage that income has increased, if any, for an Extremely Low Income Qualified Tenant, a 40% Income Qualified Tenant and a Very Low Income Qualified Tenant, based on changes in the Area Median Income. Rents may be set at the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee allowable rents for a specific year for the comparable income categories of Qualified Tenants as specified in this Agreement. Tenants occupying units restricted by this Agreement shall be given at least thirty(30) days written notice prior to any rent increase. Examples of these affordable rent calculations are attached on Exhibit C. c. "Area Median Income" shall mean the median income for households in San Bernardino County, California, as published from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") in a manner consistent with the determination of median gross income under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, and as defined in Title 25, California Code of Regulations, Section 6932. In the event that such income determinations are no longer published by HUD, or are not updated for a period of at least 18 months, the City shall use the income determinations used by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee or alternatively the Owner shall establish income determinations that are reasonably similar with respect to methods of calculation to those previously published by HUD. d. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. e. "Effective Date" shall mean the 31" calendar day following adoption of the ordinance approving this Agreement by City's City Council. f. "Extremely Low Income Qualified Tenants" shall mean Qualified Tenants whose annual income does not exceed the qualifying limits as specified in California Health and Safety Code Section 50106, as amended. g. "Lower Income Qualified Tenants" shall mean Qualified Tenants whose annual income does not exceed the qualifying limits as specified in California Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5, as amended. 2 1076 55 1639142.5 P401 h. "Project" is the development approved by City comprised of sixty(60) apartment units, recreational and common area facilities, sixty(60) parking spaces and other amenities on the Site, all as set forth more fully in the site plan for Environmental Assessment and Design Review DRC2014-00545 submitted by Developer and approved by City, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "B" and is incorporated herein by this reference. The Project is subject to the conditions of approval which are not changed, altered or modified by this Development Agreement unless specifically set forth herein. i. "Qualified Project Period" means the time period beginning with the date the certificate of occupancy is issued for the Project and continuing for fifty-five (55) years thereafter. j. "Qualified Tenants" shall mean households consisting of a person who is 55 years of age or older and any qualified permanent residents under the applicable provisions of California Civil Code Section 51.3 and the federal Fair Housing Act (except to the extent the Project utilizes federal funds whose programs have differing definitions for senior projects in which case those definitions will apply). k. "Very Low Income Qualified Tenants" shall mean Qualified Tenants whose annual income does not exceed the qualifying limits as specified in California Health and Safety Code Section 50105, as amended. 2. Recitals. The recitals are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced and enforceable as any other provision of this Agreement. 3. Interest of Property Owner. Developer warrants and represents that it has entered into an escrow or other agreement by which it is to acquire full legal title to the real property of the Site and that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement. 4. Binding Effect of Agreement. The Developer hereby subjects the development and the land described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. The City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Developer's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Development. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the development or any portion thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. 5. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between City and Developer is such that Developer is an independent party and is not the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever. 6. Term of Agreement. The term of the Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire fifty-five (55) years after the commencement of the Qualified Project Period, so long as Developer remains in material compliance with this Agreement, as from time to time amended. This Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated automatically if Developer does not 3 1076 53 1639142.5 P402 obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the entirety of the Project within five (5) years after the Effective Date, except to the extent this time frame is extended by the City Manager, or designee, in writing in his or her reasonable discretion. 7. Restrictions on Rental Units. During the teen of this Agreement, all tenants, occupants and residents shall be Qualified Tenants. However, it is expressly understood by the parties hereto that the Project has been specifically designed to meet the unique needs of senior tenants. The apartment units in the Project shall not be rented, occupied, leased or subleased to occupants who are not Qualified Tenants. 8. Rental Requirements. During the Qualified Project Period, at least six (6) of the units in the Project shall be rented, leased or held available for Extremely Low Income Qualified Tenants at affordable rents; at least twelve (12) of the units in the Project shall be rented, leased or held available for 40% Income Qualified Tenants at affordable rents; and at least eleven (11) of the units in Project shall be rented, leased or held available for Very Low Income Qualified Tenants at affordable rents. All other units in the Project shall be rented, leased or held available for Lower Income Qualified Tenants. 9. No Conversion. During the term hereof, all apartment units in the Project shall remain rental units. During the term hereof, no apartment unit in the Project shall be eligible for conversion from rental units to condominiums, townhomes or any other common interest subdivision without consent of the City Council. 10. On-site Manager. A full-time manager shall be provided on the Project site. 11. Submission of Materials and Annual Review. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall submit to City tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods which Developer shall use to advertise the availability of apartments in the Project and screening mechanisms which Developer intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartments to Qualified Tenants, including the income restrictions on some of the units as set forth in this Agreement. On or before March 15 of each year following the commencement of the Qualified Project Period, the Developer, or its representative, shall file a certificate of continuing program compliance with the City. Each such report shall contain such information as City may require including, but not limited to, the following: a. Rent schedules then in effect, including utility charges (if any); b. A project occupancy profile; c. A description of the physical condition and maintenance procedures for the Project, including apartment units, landscaping. walkways and recreational areas. City shall be allowed to conduct physical inspections of the Project as it shall deem necessary, provided that said inspections do not unreasonably interfere with the normal operations of the Project and reasonable notice is provided. City shall repair any damage and shall defend, 4 1076 55 1639142.5 P4O3 indemnify and hold Developer harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, costs, expenses incurred by Developer relating in any way to City's inspections and investigations. 12. Tenant Selection, Contracts and Rules and Regulations. On receipt of applications for income restricted units, Developer shall determine the eligibility of the occupancy under the terms of this Agreement. Verification of tenant income eligibility shall include one or more of the following factors, or any other factors permitted by the California Tax Allocation Committee for the low income housing tax credit program: a. Obtain an income verification form from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services, if the applicant receives income from either or both agencies; b. Obtain an income tax return for the most recent tax year; c. Conduct a TRW or similar financial search; d. Obtain an income verification from all current employers: and e. If the applicant is unemployed and has no tax return, obtain another form of independent verification. Developer shall be entitled to rely on the information contained in the application sworn to by the applicant. All agreements for rental of all apartment units in the Project shall be in writing. The form of proposed rent or lease agreement shall be reviewed and approved by City prior to the commencement of the Qualified Project Period. Such agreement shall include all rules and regulations governing tenancy within the Project. 13. Termination and Eviction of Tenants. A tenancy may be terminated without the termination being deemed an eviction under the following circumstances: a. The death of the sole tenant of the unit; b. By the tenant at the expiration of the term of occupancy or otherwise upon thirty (30) days' written notice; c. By abandonment of the premises by the tenant; or d. By failure of a tenant to execute or renew a lease. Any termination of a tenancy other than those listed above in this paragraph 13 shall constitute an eviction. Developer shall only evict in compliance with the provisions of California law and then only for material noncompliance with the terms of the rental agreement. 14. Hazard Insurance. Developer shall keep the Project and all improvements thereon insured at all times against loss or damage endorsement and such other risks, perils or coverage as 5 1076 55 16391425 P404 Developer may determine. During the term hereof, the Project shall be insured to its full insurance replacement value. 15. Maintenance Guarantee. Developer shall comply with all City maintenance standards enacted from time to time. 16. Standards and Restriction Pertaining to Development of the Real Property. The following specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site during the term of this Agreement: a. Developer is required to obtain all necessary land use entitlements, approvals and permits for the Project. b. Only residential uses of the real property shall be permitted in the Project; and c. The maximum density of residential dwelling units in the Project shall never greater than 30 dwelling units per acre. 17. Development Incentives. The City will grant Developer the following development incentives for development of the Project: a. Increase the maximum density on the site from 24 dwelling units per acre to 26.6 dwelling units per acre; and b. Decrease the required number of on-site parking spaces to a minimum ratio of 0.7 non-covered parking spaces per unit, however, the Developer will provide a minimum ratio of I non-covered parking spaces per unit. 18. Project Design Amenities for Senior Citizens. The Project open space, buildings and individual apartments shall be designed with physical amenities catering to the needs and desires of the senior citizen residents. The following physical amenities shall be substantially included in the Project: a. Unit sizes shall be 693 square feet for 1-bedroom residential units and 945 square feet for 2-bedroom residential units; b. Elevator service shall be provided to all upper story apartments; c. All common access areas in the Project such as entryways, walkways, and hallways will be wide enough to accommodate wheelchairs; d. The Project will meet all applicable current requirements for access and design imposed by law as.administered by the City building and safety department, including, but not limited to, the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 3601 et seq.), the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.), and the regulations promulgated at Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations that relate to access for persons with disabilities or handicaps; e. All units shall possess secured entryways off a common enclosed hallway; and 6 1076 55 1639142.5 • P405 f The Project is designed to encourage social contact by providing at least one common room (the Project community room) and at least some common open space (the Project's garden meeting spaces). 19. Indemnification. Developer agrees to and shall hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Developer or those of its contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on its behalf which relate to the Project. Developer agrees to and shall defend City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees with respect to actions for damages caused or alleged to have caused by reason of Developer's activities in connection with the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing. this provision shall not apply to any such claims which arise out of, or by reason of, the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. 20. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in California Government Code Sections 65868 et seq. 21. Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: a. If a material warranty, representation or statement is made or furnished by Developer to City and is false or proved to have been false in any material respect when it was made; b. A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in paragraph 22. 22. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Developer. City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) at the address of the Project, and by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, and if such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after such notice is given, or if not corrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within thirty(30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within said thirty(30) days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by Developer), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, City may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Developer of any provision of this Agreement, or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. After completion of the Project pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, any default may alternatively be enforced as any normal violation of the standards and provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 23. No Wavier of Remedies. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce or terminate this Agreement. Nonperformance 7 1076 55 1639142.5 P406 by Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party or entity, other than City. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing development agreements are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 24. Rights of Lenders Under this Agreement. Should Developer place or cause to be placed any encumbrance or lien on the Project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary("Lender") of said encumbrance or lien, including, but not limited to, mortgages, shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to: a. Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, and any such act or thing done or performed by Lender shall be as effective as if done by Developer itself; b. Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the security document evidencing the encumbrance or lien (hereinafter referred to as "the trust deed"); c. Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed; and d. Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by virtue of any foreclosure • sale, whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed. The City agrees that the terms of this Agreement are subordinate to any such financing instrument and shall execute from time to time any and all documentation reasonably requested by Developer or Lender to effect such subordination. 25. Notice to Lender. City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this Agreement by property owner to Lender and afford Lender the opportunity after service of the notice to: a. Cure the breach or default within sixty(60) days after service of said notice, where the default can be cured by the payment of money; b. Cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days after service of said notice where the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and can be cured within that time; or c. Cure the breach or default in such reasonable time as may be required where something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and cannot be performed within sixty(60) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default are 8 1076 55 16391125 P4O7 commenced within a sixty(60) day period after service of said notice of default on Lender by City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender. 26. Action by Lender. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a Lender may forestall any action by City for a breach or default under the terms of this Agreement by Developer by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance or lien on the Project. The proceedings so commenced may be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order of court or for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power of sale contained in the instrument creating the encumbrance or lien. 27. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such address as may be later specified by the parties hereto. Developer: 7418 Archibald LLC do Orange Housing Development Corporation 414 E. Chapman Avenue Orange, California 92866 with a copy to: C & C Development Co., LLC 14211 Yorba St., Ste. 200 Tustin, CA 92780 Attn: Todd Cottle City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: City Manager 28. Attorneys' Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during the proceeding as may be fixed within the discretion of the court. 29. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof shall inure to, the respective parties hereto and their legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 30. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. 31. Partial Invalidity. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 9 1076 55 1639142.5 P408 32. Recordation. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino. SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE • • 10 1076 55 1639142.5 P409 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the Effective Date set forth herein. DEVELOPER: CITY: 7418 ARCHIBALD LLC. a California CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a limited liability company municipal corporation By: Orange Housing Development Corporation, a California nonprofit corporation, its member By: L. Dennis Michael Mayor By: Eunice Bobert ATTEST: Chief Executive Officer By: C&C Development Co., LLC, a Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk California limited liability company, its member APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON Todd R. Cottle, its member By: The Cottle Family Trust Dated 3/8/1987, its member By: City Attorney By: Barry A. Cottle, Trustee 11 1076 55 1639142.5 P410 EXHIBIT "A" SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: The North 160 feet of the South 1/2 of Lot 1, Section 3, Township I South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian according to the Map of Cucamonga Lands, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 4 Page 9 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. EXCEPT the East 45 feet thereof conveyed to the County of San Bernardino, a body corporate in the Deed recorded March 19, 1965. in Book 6352. Page 952, of Official Records. APN: 0208-031-58-0-000, 0208-031-59-0-000 A-1 1076 55 163914'_.5 P411 EXHIBIT "B" SITE PLAN [to he attached] B-1 1076 55 1639142.5 P412 EXHIBIT "C" EXAMPLE INCOME AND AFFORDABLE RENT CALCULATIONS Examples of the maximum incomes and Affordable Rents for different income levels as restricted under this Agreement are shown on the following charts which are the maximum income levels and rents published by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee for 2015 for projects placed in service after March 6, 2015. These charts are for illustrative purposes only and the actual maximum incomes and Affordable Rents will be based on the charts published by the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee for each year after the Project is placed in service. MAXIMUM INCOMES Revisit per HUD Notice CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE Effective:March 6.2015 2015 Maximum Income Levels For Projects Placed in Service on or after 3/6/2015 One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight County Person Person Person Person Person Person Person Person SAN BERNARDINO 100% Income Level $43,500 $49,700 $55,900 $62,100 $67,100 $72,100 $77,100 $82,000 60% Income Level $26,100 $29,820 $33,540 $37,260 $40,260 $43,260 $46,260 $49,200 55% Income Level $23,925 $27,335 $30,745 $34,155 $36,905 $39,655 $42,405 $45,100 50% Income Level $21,750 $24,850 $27,950 $31,050 $33,550 $36,050 $38,550 $41,000 45% Income Level $19,575 $22,365 $25,155 $27,945 $30,195 $32,445 $34,695 $36,900 40% Income Level $17,400 $19,880 $22,360 $24,840 $26,840 $28,840 $30,840 $32,800 35% Income Level $15,225 $17,395 $19,565 $21,735 $23,485 $25,235 $26,985 $28,700 30% Income Level $13,050 $14,910 $16,770 $18,630 $20,130 $21,630 $23,130 $24,600 C- 1076 55 1639142.5 P413 AFFORDABLE RENTS Revised per HUD Notice CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE Effective:March 6.2015 2015 Maximum Rents for Projects From Ceilings Post-1989 and Those from the Pre-1990 . Ceilings That Elected with the Secretary of the Treasury*to use the Post-1989 Rents *(See!RC Section 42-Section 13142(c)of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993) For Projects Placed in Service on or after 3!62015 County Efficiency 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR 5 BR SAN BERNARDINO 100%Income Level $1,086 $1,164 $1,396 $1,614 $1,802 $1,988 60%Income Level $652 $699 $838 $969 $1,081 $1,193 55%Income Level $598 $640 $768 $888 $991 $1,093 50%Income Level $543 $582 $698 $807 $901 $994 45%Income Level $489 $524 $628 $726 $811 • $894 40%Income Level $435 $466 $559 $646 $721 $795 35%Income Level $380 $407 $489 $565 $630 $696 30%Income Level $326 $349 $419 $484 $540 $596 C_2 1076 55.1639112.3 P414 • RESOLUTION NO. 15-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP (DRC2014-00547) FROM LOW (2-4 DU/AC) RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH (24-30 DU/AC) RESIDENTIAL AND ESTABLISHING A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT FOR 2.25 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, 7418 Archibald, LLC, filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2014-00547, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 13, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. The Planning Commission also issued Resolution No. 15-33 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. DRC2014-00546 be approved. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 13, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, and is presently improved with a single family house. Said property is currently zoned as Low (L) Residential (2-4 du/ac); and b. This proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment as described in Section 4 of this resolution; and c. The property to the north of the subject site is zoned High (H) Residential (24-30 du/ac) and is developed with an existing senior housing apartment complex (Villa Pacifica I) and Office Professional (OP) and is developed with the Archibald Library. The properties to the west are zoned Low (L) Residential and are developed with single-family homes. The property to the south is zoned Low (L) Residential and is developed with the First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-34 P415 ZMA DRC2014-00547 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with adjacent development. The proposed zoning designation will allow for development of the subject site consistent with the High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH), which is compatible with the adjacent High (H) Residential with Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) and Office Professional Districts in the immediate vicinity of the project site; and b. This amendment promotes Goal HE-1 and Objective HE-1.1 of the General Plan in that future development of the site consistent with High Density Residential and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District would contribute to providing a variety of housing types; and c. That the amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment as described in Section 4 of this resolution, nor the surrounding properties. The proposed land use designation change will be compatible with adjacent properties in the vicinity and will allow for the development of the subject site consistent with all applicable development standards; and d. That the amendment would be consistent with the objectives of the Development Code to ensure orderly development. Changing the zoning district would be allow for development that is consistent with the existing senior apartment complex to the north; and e. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as it would establish High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) on the subject property, which is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00546 to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low to High Residential. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-34 P416 ZMA DRC2014-00547 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 3 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: - „ �t a ,VA and cri Burnett, Secr-tary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER,HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P417 Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 Base Line Road I I 1 NC a) c c a) • < NC a) R c c a) LE a a` c ea l: v, 1 Existing: Low (L) Residential (2-4 du/ac) 11) Proposed: High (H) Residential (24-30 du/ac) and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) Low (L) Residential (2-4 du/ac) Attachment A Palo Alto Streetr 41 f P418 RESOLUTION NO. 15-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00546 TO AMEND THE DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH RESIDENTIAL FOR 2.25 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, 7418 Archibald, LLC, filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2014-00546 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th of May 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 13, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, which is presently improved with a single-family residence. Said property is currently designated as Low Residential; and b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated High Residential and developed with an existing senior housing apartment complex (Villa Pacifica I)and Office and developed with the Archibald Library. The properties to the west are designated Low Residential and are developed with single-family residences. The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is developed with the First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the proposed land use designation in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with adjacent development; and d. This amendment promotes Goal HE-1 and Objective HE-1.1 of the General Plan in that future development of the site consistent with a High Density Residential land use designation would contribute to providing a variety of housing types; and • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-33 P419 GPA DRC2014-00546 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 2 e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed land use designation as evidenced by its location and frontage on and access to a public street, its size in being able to provide a suitable area to meet all applicable development standards (e.g., building setbacks, parking, access, landscape coverage, etc.),and the presence of similar land use designations and existing developments in the immediate area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on surrounding properties as described in Section 4 of this resolution, would establish a land use designation that is consistent with the High Residential land use designation of the adjacent property to the north of the project site, and would allow for the development of senior housing, which would be consistent with the existing senior housing complex to the north of the project site; and c. The proposed amendment would be consistent with Goal HE-1 and Objective HE-1.1 of the General Plan in that it would establish a higher density residential land use designation that would contribute to providing a variety of housing types. In addition, the proposed amendment would not create any internal inconsistencies within the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-33 P420 GPA DRC2014-00546 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC May 13, 2015 Page 3 c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. DRC2014- 00546, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman • ATTEST: �� • S - Candyce : urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MUNOZ ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P421 General Plan Amendment D 20 • -00546 Base Line Road } �, Neighborhood Commercial c m Q c ca Neighborhood Commercial 3 w Office c a) Q To 1E 2 Q Existing Low Residential(2-4 du/ac) Proposed High Residential (24-30 du/ac) Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Attachment A Palo Alto Street i1111111•1111M1 P422 RESOLUTION NO. 15-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00546, A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH (H) RESIDENTIAL FOR 2.25 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, 7418 Archibald, LLC, filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th of May 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546 and issued Resolution No. 15-33, recommending to the City Council that the General Plan Amendment be approved. 3. On the 3rd of June 2015,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 3, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, which is presently improved with a single-family residence. Said property is currently designated as Low Residential; and b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated High Residential and developed with an existing senior housing apartment complex (Villa Pacifica I) and Office and developed with the Archibald Library. The properties to the west are designated Low Residential and are developed with single-family residences. The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is developed with the First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the proposed land use designation in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with adjacent development; and P423 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 15-084 GPA DRC2014-00546 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 2 d. This amendment promotes Goal HE-1 and Objective HE-1.1 of the General Plan in that future development of the site consistent with a High Density Residential land use designation would contribute to providing a variety of housing types; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties in that similar development adjacent to the site already exists and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed land use designation as evidenced by its location and frontage on and access to a public street, its size in being able to provide a suitable area to meet all applicable development standards (e.g., building setbacks, parking, access, landscape coverage, etc.),and the presence of similar land use designations and existing developments in the immediate area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor on surrounding properties as described in Section 4 of this resolution, would establish a land use designation that is consistent with the High Residential land use designation of the adjacent property to the north of the project site, and would allow for the development of senior housing, which would be consistent with the existing senior housing complex to the north of the project site; and c. The proposed amendment would be consistent with Goal HE-1 and Objective HE-1.1 of the General Plan in that it would establish a higher density residential land use designation that would contribute to providing a variety of housing types. In addition, the proposed amendment would not create any internal inconsistencies within the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City P424 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 15-084 GPA DRC2014-00546 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 3 Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources • Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby adopts General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00546, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2015. P425 General Plan Existing Designations 7 N ighborho • • iatUIMIiCktii BASE LINE RD .. r xi - C 0 4 CO _ E pp z Neighborhood l m , • ommercial , 9 -Yt ;- - ids ti- m Low '2 p Residential — - ilk , (24 du/acre) - --- ,_ - _-- -1 . _ Office. t �, -;— liIlli___L____.' . _ Low 1 i \ Residential i (2-4 du/acre) 1 : ..._ s ( Low ( Residential PROJECT' SITE (2-4 du/acre) 1 PALO ALTO ST ipppimr---- - P426 General Plan Proposed Designation 1.::- --.-t...74 . ...- ,,F„,,trii!:;11-ii•- • BASE LINE RD x D r C _- n (0 _ D z Neighborh • %d > -, D rn �_. - ig m iiii -sidential • Low , 2 30 • . Residential ---- - (2=4 du/acre) Office 4 1 --; i ; ' igh - -sid:- ti., '-ti ._�.. ------ �_ _.._. Low - ,J PROJECT�SITE Residential (2-4 du/acre) 1 i r' t j I I PALO ALTO ST A P427 ORDINANCE NO. 875 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00547 TO CHANGE 2.25 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH (H) RESIDENTIAL AND TO .ESTABLISH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (SH), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, 7418 Archibald, LLC, filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Zoning Map Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th of May 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00547 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 15-34, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Zoning Map Amendment. 3. On the 3rd of June 2015, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Zoning Map Amendment and concluded said meeting on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 3, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2.25 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, and is presently improved with a single family house. Said property is currently zoned as Low (L) Residential (2-4 du/ac); and b. This proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment as described in Section 4 of this resolution; and c. The property to the north of the subject site is zoned High (H) Residential (24-30 du/ac) and is developed with an existing senior housing apartment complex (Villa Pacifica I) and Office Professional (OP) and is developed with the Archibald Library. The properties to the west are zoned Low (L) Residential and are developed with single-family homes. The property to the P428 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 875 ZMA DRC2014-00547 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 2 south is zoned Low (L) Residential and is developed with the First Baptist Church of Rancho Cucamonga; and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with adjacent development. The proposed zoning designation will allow for development of the subject site consistent with the High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH), which is compatible with the adjacent High (H) Residential with Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) and Office Professional Districts in the immediate vicinity of the project site; and e. This amendment promotes Goal HE-1 and Objective HE-1.1 of the General Plan in that future development of the site consistent with High Density Residential and Senior Housing • Overlay Zoning District would contribute to providing a variety of housing types; and f. That the amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties in that similar development adjacent to the site already exists and would not have a significant impact on the environment as described in Section 4 of this resolution, nor the surrounding properties. The proposed land use designation change will be compatible with adjacent properties in the vicinity and will allow for the development of the subject site consistent with all applicable development standards; and g. That the amendment would be consistent with the objectives of the Development Code to ensure orderly development. Changing the zoning district would allow for development that is consistent with the existing senior apartment complex to the north; and h. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as it would establish High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SH) on the subject property, which is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00546 to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low to High Residential. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street, the size of the parcel being suitable for the proposed land use designation, and the evidence of conveniently located commercial facilities for a senior population in the immediate area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the existing multiple-family, single- family, and commercial activities in the immediate area; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, which contains provisions for High Residential land use designations. P429 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 875 ZMA DRC2014-00547 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 2 SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 5: The Zoning Map is hereby amended to change the project site land use district from Low(L) Residential to High (H) Residential and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District(SH), in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A." SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or P430 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 875 ZMA DRC2014-00547 —7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 2 more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. P431 Zoning Map Existing Designations -ig b•th •od ag-.. .g.,:aifthifft ! Di tract BASE LINE RD _____ ___ X _ _ > . 73 j C 0 - - Ck) --- _./.. C--- eigh • • i • • li13, • z ; 1 _ ailiirdoktkili NC) r- > ; i fakpa 0 - m - High pil 11 1 -esidenti: m Low (L) District Residential ----- • ' District i . cf,2,, c3 P • fess;•n= ' e312) ' . I i i ' 1 Low (L) r -T Residential i i • District , ! -----„,,, ------__ Low (L) 1 PROJECT ' . .--- ,>-_-----r--•f\SITE) Residential i I District , --i------7— - i f I _r- I , . I • ' N i PALO ALTO ST ____ , Hl ill , 1 , i r r _ __.... P432 Zoning Map Proposed Designations (with Senior Housing Overlay) -I• • • sod DI trict BASE LINE RD 1 73 C C) f- u : I �_- --N y ' -ig borho •d o0 z ' - ; • Y (N ,) r ' v > Hblitia rn - igh VD m esidenti _t Low (L) District Residential ----- District Dice 1 �• (OP) ,igh { E I , f - I 1-1-- - lY -- - - ~ _- r" -sid ti al Low (L) Residential i ( PROJECTSITE 1 4 District r- t_______i_ , = Senior Housing Overlay PALO ALTO ST r----_ _____ ' 'F-1 I i � f 1 , P433 ORDINANCE NO. 876 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2014-00610 FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (SHOZD) INCLUDING A DEVIATION FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 24,641 SQUARE FOOT, 60-UNIT SENIOR APARTMENT COMPLEX ON 2.25 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; APN: 0208-031-58 AND 0208-031-59. A. Recitals. 1. California Government Code Section 65864 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: a. The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development to the consumer, and discourage investment in, and commitment to, comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. b. Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs of development. 2. California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: a. Any city, county, or city and county, may enter into a development agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of the property as provided in this article. 3. California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: a. A development agreement shall specify the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The development agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the agreement." 4. Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference is proposed Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, concerning that property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road, and as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A is referred to as the "Development Agreement" as "the application." P434 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 876 DA DRC2014-00610 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 2 5. On the 13th of May 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Agreement and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 15-35, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Development Agreement. 6. On the 3rd of June 2015, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Development Agreement and concluded said meeting on that date. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 3, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The proposed Development Agreement and each and every term and provision contained therein conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as amended by DRC2014-00546, a request to amend the General Plan land use designation for the subject property from Low to High Residential, and conforms to the Zoning Map of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as amended by DRC2014-00547, a request to amend the Zoning Map land use• district from the Low(L) Residential District to the High (H) Residential District and Senior Housing Overlay Zoning District (SHOD); and b. The proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, and general land uses specified in the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plans; and c. The proposed Development Agreement is compatible and in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use and zoning practice; and d. The proposed Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City; and e. The proposed Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values; and f. The location, design, and purposes set forth in this proposed Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity; and SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental P435 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 876 DA DRC2014-00610 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June.3, 2015 Page 2 assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the.environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement. SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement DRC2014-00610, attached hereto as Exhibit A. SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. P436 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 876 DA DRC2014-00610 — 7418 ARCHIBALD, LLC June 3, 2015 Page 2 SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. P437 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2014-00610 IS ATTACHED TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION # 15-35 AS EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED MAY 13, 2015 P438 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT tolle DATE: June 3, 2015 L��J TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council RANCHO John R. Gillison, City Manager CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 — CALDWELL LAND SOLUTIONS - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation from School (S) to Low Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a 6.5 acre site located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the Victoria Community Plan; APN: 1089-011-04. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561 through adoption of the attached Ordinance and the related Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved the related Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 and Variance DRC2014-01117 on March 11, 2015 for the subdivision of the 6.5 acre project site into 31 lots for the future development of single-family residences. The City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00455 on May 20, 2015, which corrected inconsistencies in the General Plan land use map and changed the General Plan land use designation of the project site from Park (P).to Low Medium (LM) Residential. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 4.7 Dwelling Units per Acre North - Single-Family Residential; Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential; Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential; Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Kenyon Park; Park B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Park North - Low Medium Residential South - Low Medium Residential East - Low Medium Residential • West - Park ANALYSIS: A. Project Proposal: The applicant, Caldwell Land Services, proposes subdividing the 6.5 acre project site into 31 lots for the development of single-family residences. The applicant is not submitting house product at this time. The site is located at the northwest corner of Kenyon Way P439 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES JUNE 3, 2015 Page 2 and Lark Drive and is adjacent to Kenyon Park, with a community trail running along the south and west property lines. The site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north to south. The site drains roughly from north to south and is covered with scrub brush. The related tentative tract map conforms to all related development criteria for the Low Medium (LM) Development District of the Victoria Community Plan, except for the depth of Lot #19. The Planning Commission approved Variance DRC2014-01117 on March 11, 2015 for the reduction in the required lot depth from 90 feet to 73 feet for Lot #19. The Victoria Community Plan requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet and minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. The Community Plan also requires that lots 55 feet wide or greater have a lot size of 6,000 square feet in order to provide variety. The project complies with each of these requirements. The smallest lot size in the development is 5,025 square feet and the largest lot size is 11,210 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,807 square feet, exceeding the 5,500 square foot average lot size requirement. The related tract map includes 3 lettered lots that will be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District in the area. Lot "A" is on the south side of Lark Drive and was created in order to permit the intersection of the new project street and Lark Drive to line up. Lots "B" and "C" were created in order to provide line-of-site visibility for the project's interior streets where they intersect with Kenyon Way, which is curvilinear along the project boundary. The Engineering Department has agreed to accept dedication and maintenance of the lettered lots into the local Landscape Maintenance District. B. Proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment: The General Plan land use designation of the project site was amended by the City Council on May 20, 2015 from Park (P) to Low Medium (LM) Residential in order to correct inconsistencies in the General Plan land use map. The Victoria Community Plan zoning designation for the project site is currently School (S). The Etiwanda School District has determined that the site is not needed as a school site. The applicant is requesting to change the Victoria Community zoning designation to Low Medium (LM) residential, in conformance with the existing zoning designations for residential development to the north, south and east. The change will bring the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation for the project site into conformance with the General Plan Land Use Map. C. SB18 Tribal Consultation: . California State Bill 18 requires that the City send project notification to California tribal communities when a project proposes a Community Plan amendment. Tribal Notification was sent on June 19, 2014 and, to date, Staff has not received a response from any of the tribal contacts. Staff also requested a Historical Resources Review from the San Bernardino County Museum. The review found that there was a low probability for the potential of finding prehistoric or historic resources on the project site. A standard mitigation measure is included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program requiring that grading stop and an archeologist be consulted if historic resources are found on the project site. D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a P44O CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES JUNE 3, 2015 Page 3 significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. Staff has not received any comments to date. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised with a 1/8t" page ad as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. Respectfully submitted, Candyce rnett Planning ector CB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A -Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 11, 2015 (with all Exhibits and Resolutions) Draft Ordinance 877 Recommending Approval of Victoria Plan Community DRC2014- 00561 P441 STAFF REPORT PLANNINGDEPARTMEN • /� t DATE: March 11, 2015 Lh TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission RANCHO FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director CUCAMONGA BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014- 00560 — CALDWELL LAND SOLUTIONS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Park (P) to Low Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for a 6.5 acre site located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the Victoria Community Plan; APN: 1089-011-04. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561 and Variance DRC2014-01117. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 — CALDWELL LAND SOLUTIONS - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation from School (S) to Low Medium (LM) Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) for a 6.5 acre site located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the Victoria Community Plan; APN: 1089-011-04. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508, General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00560 and Variance DRC2014-01117. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 — CALDWELL LAND SOLUTIONS - A request to subdivide 6.5 acres of land into 31 single- family lots for a site that is zoned School (S) located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive; APN: 1089-011-04. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561 and Variance DRC2014-01117. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 — CALDWELL LAND SOLUTIONS - A request to reduce the 90 foot lot depth requirement to 73 feet for Lot #19 of a proposed 31 lot subdivision for site zoned School (S) located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the Victoria Community Plan; APN: 1089-011-04. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508, General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00561. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1) approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 and Variance DRC2014-01117 through adoption of the attached Resolutions; and 2) recommend that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561 through adoption of the attached Resolutions and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project. EXHIBIT A Item C—Fl P442 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18508, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561 & DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 4.7 Dwelling Units per Acre North - Single-Family Residential; Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residential; Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential; Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Kenyon Park; Park B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Park North - Low Medium Residential South - Low Medium Residential East - Low Medium Residential West - Park ANALYSIS: A. Project Proposal: The applicant, Caldwell Land Services, proposes subdividing the 6.5 acre project site into 31 lots for the development of single-family residences. The applicant is not submitting house product at this time. The site is located at the southwest corner Kenyon Way and Lark Drive and is adjacent to Kenyon Park, with a community trail running along the south and west property lines. The site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north to south. The site drains roughly from north to south and is covered with scrub brush. The General Plan land use designation is currently Park (P) and the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation is currently School (S). The City determined that the adjacent 7.81 acre parcel of land to the west was a superior location for the development of Kenyon Park and the Etiwanda School District has determined that the site is not needed as a school site. The applicant is requesting to change the General Plan land use designation and Victoria Community zoning designation to Low Medium (LM) residential, in conformance with the existing zoning designations for the residential development to the north, south and east (see Exhibit "C"). The project is designed to conform to all related development criteria for the Low Medium (LM) Development District of the Victoria Community Plan, except for the depth of Lot #19. The applicant has submitted a Variance (DRC2014-01117) requesting a reduction in the required lot depth from 90 feet to 73 feet for Lot #19. The Victoria Community Plan requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet and minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. The Community Plan also requires that lots 55 feet wide or greater have a lot size of 6,000 square feet in order to provide variety. The project complies with each of these requirements. The smallest lot size in the development is 5,025 square feet and the largest lot size is 11,210 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,807 square feet, exceeding the 5,500 square foot average lot size requirement. The project includes 3 lettered lots that will be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District in the area. Lot "A" is on the south side of Lark Drive and was created in order to permit the intersection of the new project street and Lark Drive to line up. Lots "B" and "C" were Item C—F2 P443 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18508, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561 & DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 3 created in order to provide line-of-site visibility for the project's interior streets where they intersect with Kenyon Way, which is curvilinear along the project boundary. The Engineering Department has agreed to accept dedication and maintenance of the lettered lots into the local Landscape Maintenance District. • B. Variance: The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required lot depth of Lot #19 from 90 feet to 73 feet. The depth of Lot #19 is reduced by a corner cutoff required to provide visibility for oncoming traffic along Kenyon Way where it intersects with a new extension of Grimaldi Road. The Development Code defines lot depth as the horizontal distance between the midpoint of the front lot line and the midpoint of the rear lot line. The lot is approximately 114 feet deep along the west property line and approximately 20 feet deep along the east property line. At the midpoint, the lot is approximately 73 feet deep, 17 feet less than the required 90-foot minimum lot depth. Staff is in support of granting a Variance for lot depth due to the odd shape of Lot #19 and the fact that the lot is over 50 percent larger than the minimum 6,000 square foot lot size requirement (for lots over 55 feet wide). The large lot size will enable the lot to be developed with a single-family residence that meets all related setback and lot coverage requirements. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Fact: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Finding: Without the reduction in the lot depth requirement, the applicant would be required to eliminate Lot #19, which meets all other development criteria and can be developed with a single-family residence that meets all development criteria. Fact: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Finding: The project site is adjacent to a wide curve in a public street, Kenyon Way, which limits vehicular visibility at the intersection of Kenyon Way and a new extension of Grimaldi Road. The visibility issue has been resolved by providing a corner cutoff adjacent to the subject intersection, which in turn creates a physical limitation on Lot #19 from meeting the required 90- foot lot depth. Fact: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Finding: Without a reduction in the lot depth requirement, the applicant would be required to eliminate Lot #19, increasing the size of the adjacent lots to where the lots are much larger than the other lots in the surrounding area, thereby lessening the development potential of the site when all other development criteria can be attained. Fact: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Item C—F3 P444 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18508, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561 AND DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES March, 11, 2015 Page 4 Finding: It is common practice to grant Variances for a reduction in a development criteria where there is a physical limitation restricting compliance with that criteria. In this case, a corner cutoff was created to provide vehicle visibility at the intersection of Kenyon Way and a new extension of Grimaldi Road, which restricts Lot#19 from complying with the lot depth requirement. Fact: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Finding: The Variance will not negatively impact the properties in the surrounding area as the lot is of adequate size to be developed with a single-family residence that meets all City development requirements and will not be visibly different from the other residences in the area. C. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on December 17, 2014, with approximately 30 residents in attendance. The main topics of discussion were traffic concerns at the Kenyon Way/Lark Drive intersection, glare from the proposed street lights and the timeline for starting construction of the future homes. The applicant informed the attendees that a project requirement is to install a four way stop at the Kenyon Way/Lark Drive intersection, that the street lights will include glare guards and that the project will be sold to a merchant builder and thus they could not provide a construction timeline. D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Fletcher, Granger) on December 16, 2014. The Committee approved the project as presented. E. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Committee on December 16, 2014. The Committee approved the project as presented. F. SB18 Tribal Consultation: California State Bill 18 requires that the City send project notification to California tribal communities when a project proposes a General Plan amendment. Tribal Notification was sent on June 19, 2014 and, to date, Staff has not received a response from any of the tribal contacts. Staff also requested a Historical Resources Review from the San Bernardino County Museum. The review found that there was a low probability for the potential of finding prehistoric or historic resources on the project site. A standard mitigation measure is included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program requiring that grading stop and an archeologist be consulted if historic resources are found on the project site. G. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions and geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. Staff has not received any comments to date. Item C—F4 P445 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18508, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561 AND DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES March, 11, 2015 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern about the applications. Respectfully s miffed, biutoh Candyce Bur tt Planning Director CB:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A -Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B -Design Review Committee Action Agenda for December 16, 2014 Exhibit C -Existing and Proposed GPA Map Exhibit D -Existing and Proposed VCPA Map • Exhibit E -Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 Resolution Recommending Approval of Victoria Plan Community DRC2014-00561 Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2014-01117 Item C—F5 P446 naa,.3.., n.,n3 nm.i.vx - - P447 xnmx ow i.a xnuuxn•n aaaa ua mnmene __ — xn. ,,,v;:v„.,:.•=2.;:,.," d 80S91 ON i3 Ji AI1V1N31 .� � .e a3nrane 53010143 a-3100,31 . - _ 133rona----- ---__ IIi t I I I Yet Y IC i.-g- i I 1 zas p;aq'g 3 t .e I< gY. E !ICI S :a Ibis a 1!1! 1 I i I L u d g 6, ;`-si 'e 0 _ nyn i31 4y gx .i. ,i. a . i<d r9 i iiiiel 1 IIUIi1111INJJ--!fla!UIIiffflIraf ��°q�� vne I -e _- it ;1151, illt �I' as ilialitfitai.31. JIB G3 !�p x o"tic s'it's o �Vali/ilbi 3 =-1.:. 4° Pj i__________.' . , Tigitt .1 11 I aikri Al!Ill fa.la 1 reit ela eel 41 LC 1 ��r, car' n 2 �!- 1I! ' lid' 1, I .II1F S�W��I& ItjF NI ' r A =m mirkv[[[ + }3rd`�`4• /a V i/ e.bt Fe 3/11 /, �:. . EXHIBIT A Item C-F6 004,'.4 ,, .,,,0 I:„,„, I PTT N u 1 x111 'A1111131.P.^0P, h03 03btla3ee I _ (NY Mu, .0C1 MIHIV '';Wr;rt112O,J " dVIN IOV):1I3AIlVlN31 = ': 90Set ON lOtltl13Al1tl1N31 8 N o.. _ - - - S ------ 3 N '.e"avd ya s3o.rxo n rose 31x03 o a 3 a i a I ! 1 u of A p o g i, I'. H I. i ;-„if. _ a 5 i e *El I I.y x3 4 :— ' 1 TI Mi '4W 880"0 / tl1,1ff 11\ 02 F —f" 1.1..- /i e {p C / ' — s- GQP�� 1 I ° a L: IC c ) tom 74O C� �3//./�� \ `\ `l m' '--Sgt y 1-- G v ' <CT,`C1,77� iii \ ,\ .° 4 / est �x gZ. x e >F. Fie.' \ \ 5 \., .. Else / D ._ o 731 / q, /. °' ' v A \, 3 �" " { / e - gt e /I4/2, 144/64 1 I I,x / A.:7" W > y y 3 i iti/.�0 9t [\ A / / /Q E fe II? ��aJ h ; a at " as H <r K 3 0 8 / /// P 1 11 ` II � /� co // 'Z �l ,� (j p ,,,k.:x 3 s I io,/ r I g � =if l/l 1 1 I , r / / /il A, m 4)1 I , 7� Y zpa g , jzia 'II I L.I an I ? =v j0 ;0::.1 Y ' 9 IWa I --:A °: 'I —� / J �� S I x , 1� i I ,q I qtr—' . a s III L I I " I 0 e€ 3 ° 'i� I r / I III -�'- .., I I JJ:.¢ I CO °�3 6”r1 s / e- l' 7 I I'II I �r I I s t; a J I IJ ' I T� :,,r 3f33B E 3 - P ILI SI l I �� pb 883a,:t 1i 811 \,... ; t F \\_ 133b18 _ I I ,,R ' 0:g8n8nz4a9., , oll -- -di) a t3 , I ICI \\M1 \ -" I" -r`�.L 13 / o 11 I \\ I I ^y �' :7 ,°3-r."y l _ .n ,/rU i I �i' ]I �i 11 I \\ 2 f—I ``117^ ,tw �-'� _ I I,.i 7�,Cjr a. I .-- Ali ii urN sue., 111 .., � y _- 1 1 Item C—F7 HI Crx. ao,Q3x,a]a< ruv�a as P449 rr 9099 ON 10tltl13AIjVIN31 JNIOVBJ wnlaaONO'J C ? 4 U ••••°•,�3100MN xs alen<lee s»x.no _ ._ - naroua I TS °d I 1 �i _L t to x !! S _ Y YIF .. nt� 5 t, YS.' -3.. e . \®®[ ,t,,„,..,:„.:,, ,, , , ,. 5 1. _..,,,„,.. . „, , . }} : ,., „ . i . \ _,_ -_ , .._....,,s, ,L.:_.,:_:_:,, ,, ,,o , ,:.r 3i �{AEE 8.F� . . A r, / t - �J_ E '� _ x ‘ R. �y „.v om// / t � r- ) .1 . \ ``d`mac' S /'' s t . kr, .l. 'Al t) h:r imp /,.:4".'45:11%. 9 �, I ylll l '/ a �i ;e �� %// frt - .r1/ \_� rt 1 t. I s rU vie rf 1 . f.'J .0 1Q' l jJ aft /i� .;l/ ,i�o. -s Co I t % II I /9 P .P / t *. t !I / x a 0, as= � � /� � lh c I I e act / z% e / � � / \ O '; - '',,kill ,.:,177,7/e ,i/eJ ! / I , xI h / r J 171 I w > �iR 1 � G ) R �� I 9 s 'F ll ,g Eff I bl/.-/ . r/ dd yS..,� s a±P2,t[3 I 'id �1 7/ !111 4 -'T —«L a,,s^t'l . I O �7 ° 0 z i I F 1.I /l` £.-- .4!.4•N 1'1,so- III ri CA \ � i f I I f? Q t j �! 'G� f i i x11 I i I /, 1 cvt b &MI Ilr Ig�I i I! t i a a' 111'1. l i�l /�� n I I Ljl I I. 'I 117 e'- L I IfilI• I�' ; Zt III I 'I!{ I11� , : I. L �I s�Y , ,,UI All �): / _ ;Y - IlI, 1 ' -CG 1st. L- 11,; v / � 1 '`o j) i , li;IIIIII �� - , c` ,piB ®►' - s 1 / HI1'L1 I�..I Ilj a r� N I I F ,I 1 or;1 QT Y fin, - � �LA1�1.1.1:1;23:7.777-7.71 r: l �r ti. - i,l �' i ; A-i - � /' .. __- a t s ' d • s a I - 1 l �' 1 -.,, t t S IM F a5 1 rJ 4 gg r 72 £,9n 1 1 ?2 11S x . ;:1 Item C—F8 P451 \ ) , ) © { ) , 2 \ . . 2 m « ' \ s « } t R , y , 51-./ , It 6- ® ` ` \ } ( �b xr2 ! \)\ \�\. , / ; p! \ xP d _ j ty \ g, ! \ : » \ / | \ \ , . ! § !1> G » : . ƒ ; . . j \ . a 26 .-1.:'44-.,-----1F-. \ 9 k / }. \ ( . P / : : - >, ^ ' - - i t :, = % \ 25\\` / \ i 7 \ : tL \ - } . / ! d \ \ ! © .14.2.-: ( . 2 - \ z } } \ ^ °~ ' \ \ S ; \ ; I .Ti EA T 1 : , a . - \ ! I *'jr / \ IL \| ( / \ ) ; ! \ / . ` ® \ ` . \ } . z � \\ ! ,ji \\\ \ m • 3ET r31; } | { | - - - - -` : - � `2 _--- - PLAN GRANGES 1 : . ,} , TENTATIVE , c . �\ _ SECTIONS .y 1— : at. \ _ z.:_„ Item C-5 P451 il i 1 I / / / 'I I — • -- '/1/ I /I I 77----. r ¢--!!t--t ; F 6 5 : 5. 9 9-65.51; : ; • .1 • 9 9 ; : : -.., 9 II )11e 4 4 4 i t ;1 • 1 :/ // : a ,..Ll , -•• -• 9 v 9 ,\t I '•--, II 1 ;“ ■. .: '.. tkiek -/ ‘ - - 99i1j49954559/46449555. 99. 55955449494915. 944¢. 4195549495. ;5419:-499e96556. 46 12 • \ I i Ji tf45 4499 : 41 : 9tri9t15149 5295994 /99 1 II I ' 22/ 99 :/554495. 59 : 5 1 : 24499:445 •/4 I I'11 II I 9 4. 59 . 929.2_5_114949 : 94 : : : 1959ee-6*rke1919592.-2-1\ ‘.., r i I; 99 • 2.4_5 • 55 . . . ......e ¢ 9Ai.,22-59 .99999 1 r9 52/9 ' -5-=2-4-------27-Fic....._5 9 9 9 r-P--• e 0:1 4 75 9 i 5 5 k i 5 ' 67: , ' i a 9 __ /I 1 i 1914iiiii9994. 44411 : : :64+474-9-6t ;t\V:t ;i66 ::69L; ; : t ; 667 ; 6 . 4/ ¢ ¢ 91: 99 9 k4 : : 44. :!kez ,I ' i!9 5 ://e (17-5--. 4-2-05-2-54.; ;i: :11-e-75--9--7-.1 ; 6 9 9 9:: ; ; 9 c ; : - likeltittt ,.. ;;. a : 7 , 9 Ii II I I 1 : ; i i : : : ;11117 -1"1-;-:-;--;ii_; ; ; V ; : t t ; : ; ; ; ; ; IP I Ikal ;,99 * 9 ezztaee , 646 / :).5. 99 : 99999 r 7 I: ' 9 Ifierijfi'5945. 49. 1919, 99 e :I 9 9 4 9. —tp•-,-- ‘—e---_i_.. , 5 15 22-2-2-2-45 9. t. 5 ili . a 9 . . . . . .If 91: 12". ; 9 .14 9 k l 5 ¢ 91 :1; - - Ill I 4. 5„ ; 666666 , a ; 40-inee . : 59912tilelilik-412259:1666669a6 ti 70 • 1 iettetkee : 54 : 44.!: ttteee . ea :i1699I72-1-4.-:-:-. 2 545 9 9 5. 9 9 ; 9 9 / 91, 9 t5 V 159 -9 : 95-5-4-10:59- 4.5219tte9 e it _4_,utp ‘ , : cc cte a t i : e v , id. i i / • t li ' ' , 0 ejk y t 9 9 4 9 9 4 9 9 119 9 9 9 5 9 ; 9 9 • 9 ! 5 r. ! 9 9 9 9 ! 9 9. re ; = a ; 5,6 c.,46 t • 714 t 1 t. ; t. t 651 ; : : : : : : : e e,r1 45 9 =li : 42: . ;06)4 4 4 ; 4/4 /7/ r.4 i; / , v ?, . : 9 : 9 9 9 • e a a t ii e C 9 4 . 9 a r:2-e-964.-2.2..LL179 t 9 0 ' : 5. 9 9 ..57-6-2-225--22..2 9 c 9 ¢ e utleLeief : We L. 9 t-C-i'l A i f ,:2 pi we tlitt : h : 9 9 5 9 9 91979 9 ; 9-7--4-2-2-2-:-2.4 9 9 4 ' 9 915 54/6 r,6 / 9 : 9i99999 : 5999579:99999 : . . . . . ... . .... . . • 9 : 9599 . 216 9 ; /:/ '1 /6 lt tit rha :'; ; ; ; : : : : :1: 1; : : : 4: : : e e : t4- err tI2--9--4 t : 4 4 a__ _4 ---- I . , f 9/../9 : : : 995995. :;; (9-: : 99 : 9 ; te9tC159 : 999 :4 k /10 , // 4 ri: ei 6 : 599596699k5rercirittett : • tteic519 :IVai / 2/ .4Y 9: 5/1:, ; 5 ; ; ; ; ; ; 1 ; 5: 11; ; ; ; tt ; ; : i, : ; t 19 5 5, e, i v; ' /51 ;1 I /it ; ?, / , ;, , , , , , 9 ! ,_, ii, , , ,\,\, t , F', 2 t i iiet9t99 9 e955 : 619 ; ; ; ; ; ; ; 999999 ; ¢ 969 \; 9992/.05/7/ / // / 2 t, ! , t, t t. i. ! 9 ; 9 .; 9 .;:ttict 9 ; 9 ; et ; : ; ; ; et\ : ;I) ; i : ; : i : ; ; ; ; ;I: , : , c „ c , , , , ; , , , , ,!.. ,\I `\\"„^, : '‘,/),./c / 't 2 x. ,, ,,, g :-.1• ; • ,-: , •-• • i •.• • •i, , „ : c . , , , . , , , , , , , , ;\0: 441:kii /, '.t•i / g g iikeine9659 :555. 95909 d t - — . . . . c = c c c_j_t--c--c--t\c iv fk./X,12 / -5 22 I iiit , C15. 95559 : 994. 52969555 ; : trts-t-2 5 4 :Pi 99421eVeittetttttetfte < , t 9 4 t c : i , ; ! .1 g a' - g % I 1:: i ; .t ; ; : ; : : e; : : VIL. ' ■,. . . .....;_;--:<; : V/ 6 i iit!tiiiiteiiteeweett;cck,: ctcc , [.75/ ,- ..,..‘ 0 9 , O. 61E 5 6 " 6 6 6- 6 if 6 6 6 72.1/41,-A t./../' '";4 -•tt / t ' 11 :'i Virre • tetr-te te+k-4-t-:1' :.--ra : : e e " t ; ' •',7----- t ,iQlaesitiefreiaiataaear:-; -- e -t ‘ , ----•-• -i- ---/2 aii,siiiieaettaaattele•a'aaaa,-;- _,:5-",..-c.:7-' -",- 2re 'e li a i i e e a a t a a a a et„a-2 a 2...tee--....„c• _..---- /••;",- 7 ,2 .„....5-2 • 151 : 6. 9 : 495 a k ‘-'-'_--.------ --_..-,---- „__,---...,C ,---.-'7.17-—- ------------- _...„,---,,- —. .— ---:_r-,--„— -„-- 1 , . N i n / fir , ( I r o H • 2- 71 r, lig i r . 5 int )§ xn1 I ETJ . , • • Item C—F10 rEi y 2 .3 s a 'iIF . 1'$ -, ,. s :: //7,r)g-- I = 7. „ ,.,.,`Y 1 I ra I i �� `ate /; al i •\� y / I ✓” F 4j a ^/�, "I�� I" I� I . - / N ICI II _ IIII cla€ 1 �STREET III _ J : _ _I x C PA � II'I� 0 O Iti ill" u0— - - -1191 ILIJ h 11,11 II - — o n. 41 J a 991ti Y//Ifill a I;I All il -111 oo `.I {////I/ /,�f �`I a _PC� Ill I�.I iI/l _ D F s � �. ^//�flll o qt.; �� :��1��� ,: II II fir, a, 7 y HHH t J g$.-:$; $,.. O 4 / � �� • 991 till � II l i � a, <_ c ':E±-:s a ci SR _ a ,@ G9� 'çI _ till —/j H///, 1 Irk w� 7 O I. 1911 ,1 a",0 _ 11n►n� 1 \Nay ' 7%;;/e " ! 1U c. a. e.� y N a q:G i- / \x 11I `tt� __...---0,37 / i/ °aa� l t•=c/� 4� I i toll ,""' c%/ / ", to r. Ma �i / /% / ��--rI•r 11 ° ' i 6641x•]I'lli" CC�2ii<] ''''''11 --- I.I-I 1 rII fII . 't c, - A i°. s'a I ' I i t I-',I- ff ' = ' hs 31111151'0115i;iiiiii i5i'9liiiiiiapj e1 i 9 i1i 'STS $ 1 I! il1li!"sii111091lii311CiIiill xlii1 ] s i - in j9 -1 i-c ' 9 1, ,ia 192991ii i2 ii 3539191 19 111/115111 iii y! '` i3° S I 1I II 1 fl 1 iqi a ]• I ,III III !n-5 i i e 3 i. » 9 lai3iiippiiiiiai§ 15 3 5 519 91 5Sf? s �� I • .]. 1 i aalalaalaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�aaaialala 11 .. �'i r El : I ilI4IIdIOil aaaaaaaaaaaaaa�a�aaga�ai�aIV L Li '�-; . fi iiif ii{ii,Riii9i91ii,!,!!!il911 ! QII� .1 i ffE F. iii(rlifiiifiifLi -EIEIISI! 1 L / s 4 oI CRAVING CONTENTS _.. rumor CADOLE m=7� * a __ RAN CHANCES 1'I+Ci'"EU Ern 3 v d - ' WATER QUALITY TENTATIVE TRACT NO.18508 I I ..... - I I .11•1144 ion To111'.,Yr s BMP LOCATIONS I. I .REU.Qr s 31.lxmux c,ntn IL OK MIS Il vi II.el,l-tlX0 Item C—H 1 P453 a • as n ana 14.2 18/1111 d II PP rid I 8111A PI 10¢ 1 2111xpp111 1 _ x .vim i iiiii al . a ; H A .9U` £, i. lei y se i 932._, 0 C-'2,9 — 7 R4'.,ta D u 'I ;" 'II!: 5.3 5 - _' J 9 32 `_ z%IIN. in?. ____ 3 (11\ \ -- _I_ --_ l a-VA,`'1; 1 b . \.1 •Abl}Ci A..F•,. Il f ?3 r - -' I is 1Q / $ A 4'A i, n J y ^�s• } o ay -, o C ,v d. RV,ia .Sro nD f. cis, r iru " s ■ 't' Ir f" 4 1 9 . tea kr o I l' o Cfe �1 y( r.4G •• i. o o r '5, 0r5 n 4F ,S . c r ��. _ 45'14.4 t 0- t y. Cr t p• / ion e � .S�W r �1. h �u u: tit 1= � , m9 41 t „ � P / , -L, d, 4, °R .�� t u. i%1 1� �1°W / `*. '4? R?t 4 lr �,lY ' o ANI —l`\ c i lsi 2Z AIN. (rip.) .�- I_ , q ddhn of T 1113 - o" Q DRAW NG CO N1005 PROJECT NN CHANGES w[PAE021. ArtmootE TENTATIVE TRACT NO.18508 '— • i " I a ' WATER (DUALITY 1 1 " N I.4 BMP DETAILS 2. .. - ,MI.W II/t IoUlANN �_ ,I - - _ cEaAREU fvR I no;V.e,r IJ NA ll.n; FLOOR 'at OPT IIL\CII i't Item C-F12 P454 6 a4 II I c '����`,) v S iF 1 . b = �I �/is 8 '\ iii Od of e A w g g Oli J 5l g u1 A w R f f o 3 1 z JJP1 no 1 I ❑[ I ° ih5 ;CC e A° 1148;8 ol x �—�1 � 8,11:1121:14::::_E E / Z <:".. \'...--C:--r \\CT<V/ // 1'" � � /KENYON WAY 5 ' - pp{!�e �1 \ ' 01 000 ° CJ q w L 2_ _ O' I 1 '/bm�m�dt�aY w ' \,-:/' I j Q /6.{x`'.,1 _�—_--'_1_ _ i 4 I o o] O / / (.' /- \ 0 —�_.._ /0 / 000 e z 1/11 0 )� t I / / / / it JQ IT�\0 ..__.�- P---7 a ';Y;';';1 /Y /�� 1 ��--j_.._ O C 17-1 Y zo /0 �' ' 1 Q 6� 0 I- 0 ( „:::::,,iiiii7,7,w, ./,.. ii�R �- .. gyO —?-_.- � _ �2 __ I 2- .- C I_' f R . 1 O - �L-. =__ I I O O i 33 it j? r ry -4 133y1S�y I � Z h d '\ i ' -r I a V 5 Q z R J II I ` //� N N N I ' / Q O 6 I N eI� F ° 1 O ' 0 ' ' 0 .N J W v I o R ' �' / i 41•1 Q J a Z o I O W = z Item C—F13 J P455 ttrt1/44ti tall ill ii ii. F y 11111 _i VI II 1110) 2 wiHFg¢ di j j gg W I I Iih11 f , =ail P ' �` Iii a$ h = a W6 °l 5 g w $ 3. egg8 is' a,4S' PP NM aaal e LL00000000000°- a a c� r iii ` `_'� 3e W LL _- a Q a O er �$ m o 0 a .er h � j , i 1I•„,/ x/..., z ' \ '\ � i ' KEYONWAY _ � . I� ' N;aka . :• k7-_—:-40840:‘,- .4 taki.Kwiiiril o z ✓‘ �, io lK N • X11 „ a! : , \,,..44.. O 4��., , ” < � . " I�` / ®r _ -i 4k �I X411 ' i iEl / 1 1 i o 1 - I - ill y 0 ��N _1- r i'. I = !I 'V , •/ \ \ r - iC iii! ;Vir • ;, ; —'S 'p I g i1H�Q. 1 / l 1 1_/ , l I If 7/ /� I V1JVg , / Y IT ---,AIR, �IR I i:' - ��-_ `d \ -e' O C l I/ 1 I ' �) v _ III _ - 1 e I I IL -- o I® * / s 2 I d.. - 4 1 r ;t Ici I • O- ror - Q el \ ji : ! Isl — _ / _ 11 1 o 'l. '' O -.;�Sep! •:v I 2 �r.1'�I h i !I li l 1 L 1 ) 7/ ff:4!V I I = th II ro O- II c 'i m 1 Ii o, �',y, �---t \\.� -133> b,:'- 0 • — .J i , ' I I c. I >. !O y= Q - 0 u I /0 tl,' \ - r -mil— 'S I . 1 . 'I I E. t F g3 V e Q Q 3.i: l t !S _ OP — al:. Il tLg 333 - 0 V i p< J\ i1 4 i=4° Q IIII IF swat: 1 gy 6 44 ':.. G° ( ,•N, . .:1 nY u '3Cax F, J j 4Y g �,] gc A"*C ffi W I I 0 I @ I fi g 8 Q W nu 1 g�i„ w I I I I Q i\ e 9 Fb 3. D 7 Q x �15 0 . .w.... w;fi.: .5.....,,<w 3:�tiCef.``,✓'.';�',:... b a- f,� I aYg : gW,' l.1 r 3 "- 1 � 1 , 1 V I- i_ u Item C-� 4 .4. j- - P456 P457 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA bu`se DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE sir AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECEMBER 16, 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER • ( ACTION Roll Call 7:00 P.M. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz II. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP A. Approved. SUBTT18508 — CALDWELL LAND SERVICES - A request to subdivide 6.5 acres of land into 31 single-family lots within the Low Medium Residential District(4-8 dwelling units per acre)of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive-APN: 1089-011-04. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. Related cases: Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 and Environmental Review and Community Plan Amendment DRC014-00561. IC 3h lc EXHIBIT B 1 of3 Item C—F15 • P458 /9' DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA Ls. DECEMBER 16, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA III. PUBLIC COMMENTS I None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV. ADJOURNMENT 7:37 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. • 3 of 3 Item C—F16 .1 I ku. •gnu vo x . 4. 0 VNISS3W 3a#41---3101 1• .4 ... ui 0 z t 4 .440,43.4,6"._ . II.' " . 414.T PisA' 1.4"1111Liii--.°1° v°N )0- 0 6 g te ...", .. ' — '• ,. . . 0 • . .0., 0 _ . . . g z z ii: • ,. .. . .;. ..,.: • i (I) I t 770.LeVo I own,. -......., . C k b , o \cl .- • ilk 0 .4.._ 1" - ---.' CJ • I , 7 . 11111111111.. ..:,' C3 t - r../.,,C _.,... tz ...../. . ., J D 0' ,...., _ i •. . 1 J • a) .; ,- •,.. • __,_....... . . , . • - ri, ----- 1--- - / .., .4_,- •,:-,. ) , . ,,.... , a - t • 2 f 0 ... 1 1:5 t 6 - —11 3A;o1Sel.;ft' MOS ---. .-------__ OfiNgited — 0 C r. a —I NIIIANIV • C 1191111 0 al° .1110 . .- . 0110 1:1- -. ... . .44 .... a) -', C t . ....... . _..... • I ,.; 1-4, •r-, .s.....Lro .., r, I r. I ■..) - . . —4,- .," ..1 .,... , .. • , . :...A • --' ' LLJ 4 . II-- . ... : , •:" --rI".2.-.. ii--' ::;kilik''' 1 4 • • -''.....k. 11 ' ' ' ' P .- ' '? I Bog WOE ..,! .. ■ I•-.; \,.." .:-.............--• ........„ ...._ ...-"..... • ? 1 . . 1 I.. • g,. . ,'s J. 1 1 .. • 1 . .; 1 ) Nona" .ros. Lit . 1 EXHIBIT C 1... 4 .---: '• * • TI. C- F '7 Asoo to ti, YNYIYO 0 c M1MSS3Jr 3OJV3Ei07.1 W O y te t p �. �� , 4 PJSA GAO ., Q VAR YON V ti- v �w stria Immo v a O = z co A. 5 �- o to • 3 i O; d O lik (37131st/3 0 y. O ___I tiAN14'?1'0 to . iisiips .. _,-.Opp op* . 901 a) pi E 1 At. /. 1 li (") I . D ALT".341.4.4__ ,___ t. . . �' 1 , Y,�pOdd ; r f 0 j p 0 :y/ .F ON 137141-- n. . --I IPSO 'la 0' C .. _O ,, N3l1l.1 3 111111r4 ' 2,� j 04-44N C livastisam .. , . , 4.1 4i'll. , 4. 'g ' - 4 N tlfii -., . BAR O '4 ` - ; a • =� , v. . M. 11i I.... , - , 'iL • ''. -. + 0l1Oj1J1VH a c s N ti NORM mss°�, $*� i 4 4' SONTERRA d Lti t1m 6► Y' 4 r > z z i P461 W 1 III p I r ' //piN18k10.•- �� .. �— kaiS3k30l1��a.4.? 1� ' 0. w �`vz n R ThjvE-----,z. a 0----'z �r------.12 0111,13A-1 4 L___,* ,� IrLI o :.:,. k\ leV,,,,L.„... Imo, 3 - � J ?�/ V� M Z k::: fit, OI �] 0 i tLíI' / I p� Y1tfSS3V� 331V3tlO i� X021 8 1 , 4 0) }• y 'w 5 PISA 0 2 v t______:„_, _, ) (-\j,,,,,i) toe ..„ ,A, _ ,,,,(1;.- 0 ,C y� C L7°1.141.9 /1.4, 6 l ')..7 Lovito bo 0 ..0 0 E: ' \\1::: Oi ,t .2 u r-, o :0 /cf-q-isy3L- Novi . ,.__ r-, 7 r c f--.- 4 } J r J ��►ba t ^~ SN 1R� y, j OND�I2I8V�1 of \\'y d�.� — : D rte 0 ll 4,,,94::._ - _Ne Opt f 1C Gi) L� 4�fy p{N D7N0l4_ -- U P4.11Md/tit ? 1 J . � a �rH -o f t J vadiion `� �b�DObd f (-. . o i 1 U V oa37�e k I , r------ ._ ___ 5 I I J a>,vr.Nw `r � � �' C � � o � � abo`wrl� ��, �� � �� V V4�/ N l 4Q.�f�t N>,/,. \ • �.�k�rets N ols �,n., nc%�5�� 3P Li.� ( .1.,-,..-"")\.„ --- yi Chi O J tw140+ ' � ) CA ., �____ z —� - ►n�,a�` 110 / / ik u. L. psf I J J1din n _01/II\J p p C 3 1fT � �D \ pURAu. z 1 1�.WAG�y k II ki L 1 I wu�—LJ --1--N-- Y 4r"'---T 1"� �b34 . /—•1 / _I) e: 11 HF i.i ,,\\_ ____ 141 5 ,.... I 1 n rns I. l'o-? + . �.. '`-raw va P12 MZA ei/r P' I .r1 ,z p � �YMtS53W� 3�M3d07 jj�N7�OIttOdR1�/...) .,,, c_ .) r--)„( (,) 'ci,b, - ?. ,,u.., t, • rA--) ��r ,/ 5.\___I Q i00 /�d \ t _.5- ‘) q) 0 ,,..4 E sTA IQ 044 D 4.1 47;,, P ft/7 Ertovill) fr°;■c' i-\\ 4) cr) 1.,., _, 03) -4. 0 9 r - ---> c- is. i� a O ouv7te v MA N.‘ 1 0 Ci_ (W —1153,i,ies`‘..,\_7 ONVIbiltr,1- 1 0 . --l ° ; —1 „\s,,-% \, L! ii . 4•� v SWI / - ekt) lt.at d .e-a 1\. j 0 H a C e' � r l Q 'f '''2 -Cd 3 U �V `_/� ` �J ns 0WN31Ve1p y�� ' 1 S _� E t N3)4fl ?V d O rOQYlf9" flYfl Tri.i_ e V �JN3A i--0 •7 is_______1'1N S3At :_ u fa 253,10 n��a��� O N .\�. J O QJ �/ X71._ iQ ��j$ ,,. „iir U � 'owbt CAH g� , > %: n\i573":01J L!� �i 7 A 1\\ ,_ � \ i, , ,,_, .---\\s Q z c.9. 9 O � 1��1 O ^` ✓/ Al L x i �1 �}1E 1 i4t�i0//`.)a�j7iael n --------------T--'F.,' ',,, ---1c----\ i 1 Vy��� Hy � �f V y r � S 1N Ol` w Sh A f M �NON3] - Srj S sO ttteHra br 'ER RA �a ) , I d �1 f U� �?: \-\ J • k) 1�4) I I/I b Hsi � - f 1m { ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines;- the California Environmental- Quality Act; and- the-City's- Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological, drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 18508 Name&Address of project owner(s): The William Lyon Company 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor Brent Caldwell r: Caldwell Land Solutions 2300 Dupont Dr., Suite 312, Irvine, CA 92612 PG 3 h I/s EXHIBIT E Pagel of 10 • Item C-F21 ( 0, P464 Contact Person &Address: Brent Caldwell Caldwell Land Solutions 2300 Dupont Dr., Suite 312, Irvine, CA 92612 Name&Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Telephone Number 949.307.3624 r. PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(*)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Vacant lot near the intersection of Kenyon Way and Grimaldi Road. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 1089-011-04-0000 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 6.501 acres *6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 4.9 acres+(- dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The site is currently zoned by the Victoria PC as a school site. In June 2008 the Etiwanda School District Board of Trustees "determined that the Etiwanda School District does not have any intention of using the property at the Lark and Kenyon Way for a future school site."* *quoted from letter dated June 17, 2008-copy included for reference Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 Item C—F22 0 P465 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project Upon approval of the tentative tract map, the project will need to obtain the approvals required to construct single family homes and obtain the necessary environmental and discretionary permits normally required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and local agencies that have jurisdiction. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The site is vacant and has minor native vegetation (weeds). There are no structures or significant features on site. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 Item C-F23 P466 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): There are no known cultural or historical aspects of this site. Additionally, the site was mass graded when the Victoria Community was originally constructed. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise, etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: The only noise sources are local roads and the adjacent park. • 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: This project is to get TIM 18508 approved for 34 single family lots, public streets and landscaping that will be maintained by an existing LMD. Approval of architecture and site planning will follow with separate applications. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential, commercial, etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): To the north, east and south there are either existing local roads or existing single family residential communities. There is a public park along the westerly boundary of the project. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 Item C—F24 0 0 P467 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The project is intended to mimic the surrounding uses. 15) Indicate the type of shod-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Normal construction equipment will generate noise in the short term. In the long term, the only noise generated will be what is normally generated by single family residential development. *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: None. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: The site drains into the public storm drain that exists adjacent to the site. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank El Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 Item C—F25 0 P468 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units:34 Detached(Indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Lots range between 5,037 sf and 11,283 sf in size. The average lot size is 6,385 sf. Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS • 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: N/A Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 Item C—F26 • P469 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation: N/A • 28) Number of employees: N/A Total. Maximum Shift: N/A Time of Maximum Shift: N/A 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: N/A '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): N/A • ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. All agencies were contacted and the responses were that given the site is contained within an existing community with all of the master planned facilities in place, there should be no issues serving this project. Updated 4111/2013 Page 7 of 10 Item C—F27 P470 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels,oils,sol vents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. There is no history for the site storing or discharging hazardous or toxic materials. There is also no history of underground storage tanks for this parcel. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. The only materials that will be used on site are those that are used to grade or improve the site and any materials used to construct the future homes. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief l further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamon.. • Date: 5/28/14 Signature:, : tt • s Title: President & CEO Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 Item C—F28 0 0 P471 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 Item C—F29 • ( ( P472 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 Item C—F30 120' N 1 o 0992 n /3d11u 100,2.110 .LI ca/a,.x/199 1104 0311V1061 P473 '~°°'Y0A'`mom ' ��� dVW 13V?ll 3AI1V1N31 a a 80581'ON.1.01/211.3/3114/11331 p a i H ' - 3I :u Cana.' sumo x10 =Mid Walla arm I $ !VI Ill _, :522! r.-- -� � i ' Q 1'; e`[` j °'•Fpla PI iI" '+71 < 9 s 4;R 1 9 ' Ey S aA S A09� { ! I !J k 2 � §E S`§ 99: iSs ISS .. E 1I119d! 9pv° " 1 S l o § c _ esov vvvec se sz}H v! !�,!!i! !3 I!9IJ tg sd ' [ a`999SS9S±9995399 @."s64 1 9 1 II :. F e mm �evll— :' 9 'cya r 1g CO 9' _� _�4l 41.11 zgr PI _ 9 L 0 al y,Iq / ! z °�g� � '/i /- ��` - .i"4' ''fY'�1'P.r /411/1 co 2,%' ,></./%1:0 - - lel \, -iir 1 011 V 4/ s zZ I.1 n / � o N / / a 3_ a,.4 pE ,,e.,s 4.4 4tki.tAili `,, * :. \ all 2p Hi? n, . a 1 H w Cm 111E §§§/S //I/ 499/ !t :d l/o� " .0-;Q I /e ( ;3 g...I - 'a ail ''' 1 8 b 1; I ]- E i l�op b �Yli gy�9 ! 41 A b 1 3 O� 2 o , 0! U11 ,�11 I c____ o a , zN !;gill! I 'III i ' l I —e l l l l6! '1B 4� �� -� III IIl ; s ♦ amary �.-. -'o'__ P9PYYYIP 9 1111 M I y x 11 I 'l1 I I 4\ i 2 " .i ... ' ,f i ell U 'III, x b l c q 9 bi.;I , 11111 �5. [ S�S ° ( a f 7. ll \ a K d 1 P i IT U g 91 •011 ID 1 NA ii �' to -1/c-'se" V �.a. �V� //,,.4 Ir,/ 11 93 , 9d^, - r I 110 rit.1141 1 I Item C-F31 P474 P475 I ` r City of Rancho Cucamonga .V� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM .: INITIAL STUDY PART II �.` t E.= BACKGROUND 1. Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 and Variance DRC2014-01117 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: The applicant proposes subdividing a 6.5-acre project site into 31 lots for the development of 31 detached single-family residences. The site is located at the southwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive and is adjacent to Kenyon Park. The site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and approximately 400 feet from north to south. The site drains roughly north to south and is covered with scrub brush. The site was previously designated to be a school site. The school district has determined that the site is no longer needed for educational purposes and was sold to a developer. The project site is within the Victoria Community Plan Area with a zoning designation of School. The General Plan land use designation is Park. The applicant is requesting to change the zoning and land use designation to Low Medium (LM) residential —The development will also require a Variance to reduce the lot depth on Lot 19. APN: 1089-011-04. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Brent Caldwell 2300 Dupont Drive, Suite 312 Irvine, CA 92612 5. General Plan Designation: Park 6. Zoning: School 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: There is a City park (Kenyon Park) to the west and single-family residences within the Low-Medium (LM) Development District to the north, south, and east. Kenyon Way runs adjacent to the northern boundary of the project. An existing community trail is located adjacent to the west and south property lines. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD—California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District . EIR — Environmental Impact Report Item C—F32 P476 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga <SUBTT18508> Page 2 FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG— Reactive Organic Gases PM,o— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan - ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or"Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (1)Aesthetics (✓)Agricultural Resources (✓) Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (✓ ) Cultural Resources (1 ) Geology& Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (✓ ) Hydrology &Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (✓ ) Noise ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation (V) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of ( ) Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F33 P477 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Maap�SUBTT18508 Page 3 Prepared By: r/�vJ�, Kr Date: 2/115 Reviewed By: cp=+--}d,- Date: 4211.5- /Z f iS • Rev 8-18-14 Item C-F34 P478 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ppta iauy With han Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (1) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south, and east and by a City park to the west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project as it will be of a similar design and density to the surrounding development. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. The change to the visual environment due to the project is not considered a significant impact, no mitigation required. d) The project would increase the number of street lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. The lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (1) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ). ( ) ( ) (1) Williamson Act contract? Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F35 • P479 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated _ Impact Impact c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the southwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south and east and by a City park to the west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is surrounded by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is surrounded by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The site is located at the southwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south; and east and by a City park to Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F36 • P480 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mitigaation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact the west. The nearest agricultural use is more than 3 miles to the southeast from the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that • qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State . ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 (increase in the frequency or severity of violations of local air quality) or Criterion 2 (exceed assumptions in the AQMP consistency with the 2003 AQMP). The density of the proposed project is consistent with the level of development anticipated by the General Plan for the project site. Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (502), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMto and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H25), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management•District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F37 P481 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigaron Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall, and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMio), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.$) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide(NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM2.s. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by LSA (April 2014; Technical Appendices C) that utilizes the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2013.2.2 to evaluate short- term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F38 P482 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With man Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Short Term (Construction) Impacts Short-Term Regional Constriction Emissions Total Regional Pollutant Emissions(Ibe/day) Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust Construction Phase VOC NOs CO SOx PM,. PMTS FMK, PMas Site Preparation 2.0 21 16 0.016 2.4 1.2 1.3 1.1 Grading 3.9 41 28 0.032 23 2.3 . 1.4 2.1 Building Construction 2.9 22 16 0.027 033 1.3 0.14 1.3 Architectural Coating 14 2.6 2.5 0.0041 0.089 0.22 0.024 0.22 Paving 1.3 13 8.1 0.012 0.089 0.71 0.024 0.65 Peak Daily Emissions 17 41 28 0.032 5.0 33 — SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Emissions? No No No No No No Source:LSA Anocialn,Inc.(April 2014). Note Peak daily emissions are based on a worst-case assumption that the Building Consrmcdon and Architectural Coating phases would overlap. CO=carbon monoxide PMzn=particulate onitS Ica than 23 microns in size COI=mutton dioxide PM is=paniculate matter leas than I0 microns in size CO2,.carbon dioxide equivalent SCAQMD.South Coat Air Quality Management District Ibskl•y•pounds per day . - SO,=sulfur oxides NO =nitrogen oxides VOC=volatile organic compound Construction Localized Impacts Analysis Etufsaions Sources I NOr r CO NMI _ PM On-Site Emissions 40 27 4.9 1 3.3 Localized Significance Thresholds 270 1,746 14.0 8.0 Significant Emissions? No No No No San:LSA Associates.Inc.(April 2014). Note:Son Receptor Area=Central San Bernardino Valley,S mess,80-foot distance for residents. CO=carbon monoxide PM,,=particulate matter lass than 2.5 microns in size LST.localized significance threshold PMu=particulate natter less than 10 microns in size NOx a nitrogen oxides SRA=Source Receptor Area Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on-site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on-site would result in localized exhaust emissions. • Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F39 P483 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 9 Less Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Fugitive Dust • Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by-project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. The project proposes subdividing 6.5 acres in order to create 31 single-family lots. Based on the project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 17 lbs. of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs./day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, which is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less-than-significant. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban • Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.s and P■ to) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F40 P484 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: °dta Tally With han Significant crpon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, - - smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the - surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment related emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Although the project will not result in any significant short-term construction impacts, the following mitigation measures as identified in the 2010 General Plan FPEIR shall be implemented • to reduce cumulative impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained.as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the • construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F41 P485 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. _ • _Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM113 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.s and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term (Operational) Impacts Operational emissions for the project are shown in the table below and were calculated using CaIEEMod model to account area, energy and mobile source emissions. The proposed project was analyzed based on the development of 31 single-family residences. Based on trip generation factors included in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (Ninth Edition) which are also provided in the trip generation study prepared for the proposed project (LSA, April 2014), the projects daily trips were entered into the CalEEMod model. Long-term operational emissions associated with the project are shown in the table below. Area sources include architectural coatings, consumer products, hearths and landscaping. Energy sources include natural gas consumption or heating and cooking. The table shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would not exceed the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds for any criteria pollutants. Therefore, project-related long-term air quality impacts would be less-than-significant. Rev 8-18-14 • Item C—F42 P486 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially won Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Regional Operational Emissions - Pollutant Emissions(lbs/day) Source ROC I NOT CO I SOx I Mx I i'3125 Proposed Project _Area Sources 3.2 0.033 2.9 0.00015 0.061 11.061 Energy Sources 0.034 0.29 0.12 0.0019 0.023 0.023 Mobile Sources 1.4 4.0 16 0.037 2.5 0.71 Total Project Emissions 4.6 4.3 14 0.039 2.6 0.79 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150. 150 55 Significant? No No No No No _ No Source:LSA Associates,Inc(April 2014). CO.carbon monoxide Ms=pwtkulaa:matter less than 10 microns its sire lbs/day=pounds per day ROC.=reactive organic compounds NO,a nitrogen oxides SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality MaoagemcM District PMaa a particulate matter less then 23 microns in rim SO,=sunlit.oxides Long Term Operational Localized Impacts(lbs/day) Emissions Source NOs CO PM2* PM On-Site Emissions ss 023 3.6 0.19 0.097 Localized Significance Thresholds 270 1,746 44 24 Significant Emissions? No No No No Scarce:ISA Associates.Inc.(April 2014). Nat=Source Receptor Area a Central San Bernardino Valley,5 acres.80-foot distance for residents, on-site traffic 5 percent of total CO o carbon monoxide NOx=nitrogen oxides lbs/day o pounds pa day PA425=particulate muter less than 2.5 microns in rein 1ST=localized significance threshold PMI°=particulate nutter less than 10 microns in sire 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Lona Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR)analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in • significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: • 1) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 2) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F43 P487 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Wnh Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 3) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. • After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor, Kenyon Park and Rancho Cucamonga High School. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than- significant levels. 4) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM23 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust and the installation of roofing material, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with residential uses such as cooking and gardening. Typically, the proposed residential uses do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts anticipated. • Rev 8-18-14 Item C-F44 P488 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially WM1ti Than PP g Significant corporate Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) . _through habitat. modifications, _ on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local- or regional plans, policies; or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) . resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area covered by any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The site is located at the southwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south and east and by a City park to the west. The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. In addition, a General Biological Assessment (LSA April 17, 2014; Technical Appendices A) was performed on the project site that concluded that the proposed project is not anticipated to affect threatened or endangered species, or their critical habitat, although the shrubs on the project site may provide nesting habitat for birds observed using the site as well as other birds known in the region. It is recommended that vegetation clearing activities be scheduled outside of the avian nesting season (February 15 through August 15). If construction activities are planned during the avian nesting season, a pre-construction Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F45 P489 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 15 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmamia wiWith Than Significannt t Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact nesting bird survey should be conducted within 30 days prior to commencement to avoid impact to birds protected under the Fish and Game Code and Migratory Bird Act. - - 1) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, a breeding bird survey that is in— - - conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. 2) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, a Burrowing Owl Survey that conforms to the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City, is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. There are no tributaries or wildlife corridors on the project site or in the surrounding area, therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with local ordinances. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? Rev 8-18-14 Item C-F46 P490 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With tan Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) outside of formal cemeteries? - - - Comments: ._ . . .. a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F47 P491 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by • Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the - following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. . • d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments including annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F48 P492 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With nan Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial - - -.- • adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or - death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. H) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1/4 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing M„, 6.0-7.0 • earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„,7.5 earthquakes is • 15 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 17 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F49 P493 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: - 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM1 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM1g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the 501 for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga gravelly loamy sand (0-9 percent slopes) soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga gravelly loamy sand (0-9 percent slopes) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically used for irrigated small grains and pasture plants and runoff is very slow to slow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F50 P494 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With man PP 9 Significant Incorporated to Significant I Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) 0 indirectly, that may have a significant•impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? () () O (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance -The Federal Government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005,'Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western States, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit(°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F51 P495 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant Na. Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a performance based standard (CEQA 15064.4). . - Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PMio, PM2.s, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMto, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board • adopted the staff proposal for an interim GHG significance threshold for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis (LSA, April, 2014) (Technical Appendices c) uses the SCAQMD, interim GHG significance threshold in their study of the projects projected GHG emissions. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The proposed project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project was analyzed using the CaIEEMod model based on the development of 31 single-family residences. The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area source, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment. The project construction and operational GHG emissions have been calculated using the CaIEEMod model based on the parameters detailed above. A summary of the results is shown in the tables below: Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F52 P496 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: petennally With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions . _ - ... . Total Regional Pollutant Emissions • - • - - (MT/-ear) Construction Phase. - CO2- . CFI, NaO-. . . CO2e- Site Preparation 7,6 0.0022 0 7.7 Grading 30 0.0086 0 30 Building Canstniction 150 0.025 o 130 Architectural Coating 17 0.0018 0 17 Paving 23 0.0064 0 23 Source:LSA Auociam4 Inc(April 2014). .Note;Total conamctioa GHO emissions.355 MT of CO,e, CH,.methane MT•metric tons COI=carbon dioxide MT/Year=neuie mar per year • CO2e•carbon dioxide equivalent N,O=nitmw oxide Long Term Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pollutant Emissions(MT/year) • Source Blo•CO% NRio-001 Total CO2 014 N,O 1 CO,e Construction Emissions 0 12 12. 0.0022 0 12 (amortized over 30 years) Operational Emissions Area 0 8.7 8.7 0.00074 0.00015 8.8 Energy 0 140 140 _ 0.0046 0.0018 _ 140 Mobile • 0 490 490 0.02 0 _ 490 Waste LI 0 8.1 0.48 0 18 Water 0.7 13 13 0.073 0.0018 IS Total Project Emissions 8.8 664 672 0.58 _ 0.0038 684 Sourc ISA Associates,Inc.(April 2014 Note:Numbest m table may not appear to add up conealy duo to rounding of all numbers to two significant digits Bio-CO,=biologically generated CO, MT=metric tons C11+-°methane MT/year=metric tons per year COr=carbon dioxide NA)•nitrous oxide Core=carton dioxide equivalent NBio-CO,=Non-biologically generated CO, The construction and operational data provided in the tables above show that the proposed project would create 684 MTCO2e per year(operational emissions). According to the SCAQMD, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on-going operations would exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, with the mitigation measures outlined below, a less than significant impact would occur from the generation of greenhouse gas emissions from the cumulative development and operation of the proposed project. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading, and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F53 P497 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Than Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incoryoratetl Impact Impact job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. • Lonq Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for"adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. The project involves the construction of subdivision of 6.5 acres of land for the future development of 31 single-family residences and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several • design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: energy efficiency, renewable energy and energy storage, water conservation, solid waste measures, land use . measures, transportation and motor vehicles, agricultural and forestry and off-site mitigation. The project is in the vicinity of existing transit lines; because it is an infill project; it is required to install water efficient landscaping pursuant to the City's Development Code; and, will participate in the City's waste reduction and recycling programs. Rev 8-18-14 Item C-F54 P498 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: gnmlany Mitigation an Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Inco,poraletl Impact Impaq The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. Additionally, the City is participating in the - • development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy.(SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develope site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow• faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F55 • P499 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially WW1 man Significant Mitigation Significant No • Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the construction of subdivision of 6.5 acres of land for the future development of 31 single-family residences. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that • respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHGs and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly(AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) environment through the routine transport, use, or • disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 • miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F56 P500• Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Imp act Impact h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) V) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or • where •residences are intermixed with wildlands? - . • - _. Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) Rancho Cucamonga High School (11801 Lark Drive) is located within 1/4 mile of the project site. Typically, residential uses do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 7.7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F57 P501 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 27 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pogemlal with nan Signintiant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. - - h)• Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires'in the Very ' High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. No impact is anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been • granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, • which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) (1) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F58 P502 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 28 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than pp g Significant coWithOn Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading; excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Madole and Associates (September 14, 2014), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F59 P503 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 29 Less That Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant PP g Sigantiam MOigation Significant No Impact Inwrperate0 Impact Impact shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) - An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and - implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post- Construction Operational: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F60 P504 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require grading and excavation, but would - not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With the implementation of the following mitigation measures specified under subsection a) and the following mitigation measure, the impact is less than significant: 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Modole and Associates (September 14, 2014) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F61 P505 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: paemlan With With han Significant t core cafe Significant Im Impact Impact Inm`poreteE Impact Impact h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) - The Rancho Cucamonga area- is flood protected by an extensive-storm -drain system • - designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive is surrounded by residential development to the north, south, and east and by a City park to the west. This project will be of similar design and size to the surrounding residential development to the north, south, and east. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Park (P). As part of this application the applicant has submitted a Victoria Community Plan and General Plan amendment to change the land use designation from Park (General Plan) and School (Victoria Community Plan) to Low Medium residential. The project also includes a Variance to reduce the required 90 foot lot depth to 73 feet on Lot 19. To the north, east and south are single-family lots of similar sizes. To the west is a neighborhood park. The proposed 31 lot single-family subdivision will fit into the surrounding single-family neighborhood and become part of the community. The land use change and the subdivision layout is compatible with the surrounding area and will not create a conflicting land use since it will be surrounded by existing land uses that are designated Low Medium Residential. The proposed project does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, the Ontario International Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F62 P506 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wlh Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Airport's ALUCP or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. - - c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan - - area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F63 P507 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant corpalion Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. A Noise Impact Study (LSA April 2014; Technical - - - Appendences B) was prepared for the project site which concluded that with the following mitigation measures the noise impact on the future homes will be less than significant: Exterior 1) Construct a sound wall that is a minimum 6 feet above the pad elevation along the perimeter of the ground-floor backyards for all residences adjacent to Kenyan Way. The barrier shall be some combination of berms and concrete masonry units (CMOs). 2) Install a mechanical ventilation system such as a mechanical fan or air-conditioning system for all dwelling units with direct line of sight to Kenyon Way traffic. 3) Construct a minimum 5 foot high sound barrier on each balcony/deck facing Kenyon Way and/or within 30 feet of the Kenyon Way centerline. The sound wall shall be constructed with a combination of wood and plexiglass, with no gaps. 4) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 5) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, sixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 6) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 7) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 8) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent . feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 10) The applicant shall submit a noise study when the houses on the lots are submitted for approval to verify compliance with the City's noise standards. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F64 P508 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Potentially Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitiga tion Significant nt No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in The traffic Study prepared for the project (LSA, April 2014) states that the total project related vehicle trips would be 64 trips a day, less than 2 percent of the existing traffic volumes on Kenyon Way. This increase would result in an increase of less than a 0.2 dBA increase in traffic noise level, which is not perceptible to the human ears in an outdoor environment. As such, no impacts are anticipated. d) The General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F65 P509 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wati Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact t Impact e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 7.7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) (✓ ) ( ) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project proposes the subdivision of 6.5 acres into 31 lots for the future development of single-family residences. The project includes Community Plan and General Plan Amendments to change the zoning from Park (P) and School (S) to Low Medium (LM) residential. The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. According to the United States Census Bureau, 2009-2013 American Community Survey, the average household size is 3.19 for owner occupied and 2.72 for renter occupied. It is estimated that the 31 lot single family subdivision will generate a population growth of approximately 100 persons. Since the project is an infill and surrounded by developed infrastructure, adequate schools and the utility capacities to serve the project, the impact is considered less than significant. Further, construction . activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The impact is considered less than significant. significant b) Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. c) Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F66 P510 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 36 less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potential with han Significann t t With Significant No Impact ,Incorporated Impact Impact c) Schools? () () () (1) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the southwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive, would be served by a Fire Station #175 (11108 Banyan Street) located approximately 1.3 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The additional residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is already regularly patrolled. c) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not • considered significant. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park (Kenyon Park) is directly adjacent to the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of development impact fees the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F67 P511 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wtn Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant NImpact Incorporated Impact Impact 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that - substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park (Kenyon Park) is located directly adjacent to the project site The project proposes the subdivision of 6.5 acres for the development of 31 single-family residences which will increase the use of parks and other recreational facilities within the City. The project is consistent with the density of development anticipated for the development district and will not overburden the existing and proposed recreational facility within the City. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project does not include the development of new or the expansion of existing recreational facilities. No impacts are anticipated. 16. TRANSPORTATIOWTRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) V) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F68 P512 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant coWithOn Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. - Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 337 vehicle trips daily per the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) trip generation model. The proposed project includes the development of 31 detached residences. Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) trip generation model estimates that each detached residence will generate 10.87 trips daily. The ITE trip generation model also estimates that each detached residence will generate .75 two-way peak hour trips daily. Projects that generate more than 100 two-way peak hour trips are considered by the City to have a significant impact on the environment. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is estimated to create 23.25 two-way peak hour trips, and will thus not create a significant impact on the environment. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project includes Community Plan and General Plan Amendments to change the land use from Park (P) and School (S) to Low Medium (LM) residential. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in the project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion • Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. With adherence to these programs, no impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 7.7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipate d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 • Item C—F69 P513 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With nan PP g Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The project will be required to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project the project design will provide adequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project is within walking distance of public transportation and there is a community trails adjacent to the project site, providing convenient access to pedestrians and bicycle riders. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion.of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for build out of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F70 P514 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant corporae Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. A General Biological Assessment (LSA, April 17, 2014) was performed on the project site that concluded that the proposed project is not anticipated to affect threatened or endangered species, or their critical habitat. The report, though, Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F71 P515 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant ption Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact recommended that if grading occurs during nesting season (February 1 through August 31), that a bird survey be conducted. A mitigation measure has been added in the Biological Resources section of the study requiring that the submission of bird nesting survey to the Planning Department prior to the approval of a rough grading permit. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The Air Quality and Green House Gas sections of this Initial Study outlined potential cumulative environmental impacts that the project may have on the environment that would be mitigated to less-than-significant with the implementation of the included mitigation measures. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality(cumulative), Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact (cumulative only). Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. A Noise Impact Study (LSA April 2014; Technical Appendences B) was prepared for the project site which concluded that with the mitigation measures outlined, including the construction of a 6-foot high sound wall, the noise impact on the future homes will be less than significant. The Initial Study also identified potentially significant impacts to water quality; however mitigation measures will reduce those impacts to less-than-significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one • or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F72 P516 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 42 (a) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19,2010) (b) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (c) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (d) Victoria Planned Community DR (Certified May 20, 1981) Technical Appendences (see disc) (A) Biological Resources Assessment Survey(Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. (LSA, April 2014) (B) Noise Impact Study(LSA, April 2014) (C) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis (LSA, April 2014) Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F73 P517 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 Page 43 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. .n Applicant's Signature: m,L•. 1//r A f// Date: Z' p• I rj. Print Name and Title: _ (Q 4CttAit' r CAANACY tf • Rev 8-18-14 Item C—F74 P518 P519 "' 4:'j City of Rancho Cucamonga lik y MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 and Variance DRC2014-01117. This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance Will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item C—F75 P520 Mitigation Monitoring Program GPA DRC2014-00560, VCPA DRC2014-00561, SUBTT18508 and Variance DRC2014-01117 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • Item C—F76 '521 a) ° c `01° a c E O 0 � U c c a) o v 'Cl. (oz N N N N 0 . TO 'O C a) a) 4). 15 C. > O c I- o o Q ou ls CL L ,- >- 2 > 0 o 0 0 0 I- - C Cl) o 0 / = O U a 0 0 (n J N N 0 '� (590 0 3 N C C N O a a Q v• Z o ° 0 a c a `0 0 O U Zr C_ w 0) a) y G) a) yr C y E N c a) N 2 N a) F. m u- H > a X ° `o) CC CC J m (0 cc U w •0 C o aa) o U a .o m W a c o r a 2 � U U o m ) a () a a 0) CDZ o. 059 o a o 5 0 c c I- a 00 m H Q 0 8 O 0 a O Z � ° m a d m O cue 2 01 `; L N L 0 = a N a) c 7 o L N O c Ca 0 2 0 L E C c a) D o c E 0 3 oN U - ° m Z N - o o .� m ° 0)) ar 2 a 0E ° om0 y < t o c � p '0a r1oc _ca2o m aoo) ' 2Q � . 1v, uUiw . o0 Q C co C O O) O > w c V o a) a S1 c ° 0 CO (y O ) C_ a) o C E a) O cs C T ca.) ° rp C 0)L n c c a) c � � � c D y rn0 0 0 2 ~ c N `o � c E 0 :r. 0 aa)i a co o o cc p o E " c "- >`U N d _ ° o - m 0 o0 u1 /0 CO - 0 -- 0 t0 0 c a a 0) n 00 H 0 a C) C C L (o -0 V) (0 (0 T L c .0 V a) 2 2 r h '5 ,,a) a) c .E )o L. Ea' 0 > o -0 0mE2 " m ✓ T B Q O O 0 a) y �.- O .0 -c a) 0 0 .c y U W 0 L 0 < Ea voy 0) '� W -0 N — a E -o - - 0 0) a 0 0 59 0 ,1 >. N C CO co N CO -o a Ill Z O O ° a (0 O O O L O N ? 0 CO C d E C (A m ca 0 .0 5918 co a) c n � o N07ca) LEN0m0C7N ° NCL 0 CO '0a 0. a) N O y Q O c N a) 7 .o 7 c E L Q N O 7 _0 O c - Q CO C (h E C Z a 10 ° -0 O V O N m u) d U ° Q 0 0) N N O a1 -o 2 c a U. 0 • N o " O w a) c o > U E a °i.: c d c E 2 L `m 0 c- E n 7 " I c o w c v YaEa) 7) a°) mmQ ao a) a 2 -0 I. r C C c C .. C '- O -0 C a) c ' U .0 d .a a) c • (0 oa) M m — m w o o a) E ma) d 59p0 § > oe ° —e. . — m 0 " Ec — QEmUUwE � wd52 SI � nUU � ¢ a� m � ¢ n Item C-F77 P522 m U C O W w C co E O O U . • C V • V . co co o Z N N N N N V V . V V N 10 r '0 C o C F 0 o 0 )O > O c o v Ca . o u .0 2 > 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q Q C Q C C C C 0 0 0 0 U C to CO C C C C ` 2 ` 2 o o o CO CO CO N c a a a a a a N N C N C C C ' O 0 0 oO o O o 0 U a mu 3 3 3 3 3 3 m m m m C _ 0 0 N 0 0 0 G C C C ` 5 > � > > � 1- > Q0' 00' 40' R0' X0' d0' = 0 0 0 O7 co Co O 'C C 0 .'O" 0 N C 0' 0 o c2 2u- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0) 0 c ro ao N =' C C O O O.M aa)) .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it m m m m m m m m m m L_ m 0 "0 a) C 0 - CV 0 � mw L °0 V 0 Q � L_ C L C N L O « N 'O - C 0 a) o C 0 0) C 2 CO » L 2 N .� 3c 3 - a) L ro g mm � ` aN) E0 L5C7 ouj E00Ct aoo om 2 co a) -0 U � � E ca 23a) m oUm � 0 E o C 02 E O Y E C N N co m 0 0 a � O co t CO C U Q 0 O N 0 N ai .0 N 0 -O C U co .J > D) L L N L T O o CO > > am E E X 23 � u o ' o 'er c C O o o 0 al j7 Uo N of O L c 0 0 CO O N - Y CO O 0 0 3 0 C V m L 0 0 V L o y U co 0 U 00 O O 0 toil r0 .O C CO TO CD"5 r_ U w 7 (` N U N N '.' N .3 O ,_ d co c -o CL a) ma) N y a1 N VO C oUd YO a @C E a a7 c0i ETi 0 > @ O 0 od O N N U 0 0p_ '- CO O -0 "O 0 0 L N 0 m a C C E o a, m m— m : x O L C m r N C ' m� o � E m -- 0 N ' `p)._ a Cw a > 0 a= cca, ._ U CCAQ 0 �`0 O CSm — N T NYo0 "' N3 C) -O8N0 0 @QE .ON ONQCO Z C 0 7 L N O a m_ C 0 -0 O U .O 0 . N CO m 0 C d CO N 0 _O CO >-..- O V CD 0 N L 0 a) 0 C C C N L CO CO U -0 O) C C N = D)- (6 CO cD N Q 0 N y ` 0 N 0 0 a) C a 0) o tan 0 a YO ` > O a N 0..4- CO O oo C y N 0 ^ a) 4) ` O O C 0 C > "O CO N 0 L 0 . a U 0 0 W N U >. ,- N C E 0 . O T o - '0)m^ 0 CO � C C 0 .2 co O co c0ooc� m a0 ca a) ooE > ct o.i aE � � QaC� C c UQ > a) N � � � a E Q ® U a • • • • • • • • F N N -d rna s a 2 E ,-7, Item C-F78 P523 a) o o w a c E 0 0 0 0 v 'Cr INS 0 M Z V V (-.1 N V V V C') N 10 V C a) C F 0 a) 0 C O 0 V V 0 ._ .- C E > Q a a 0 Q Q a C 0 ..= N N (0 N w w 0 ` C C C C C C 0 m CO m CO CO m a c !A a n. a O. a a N w 0 C 0 '� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 too N N N N N N C w N E > _ _ _ > >> CC - > o it it CC it CC CC co co > C o C C 4E) 5 N) C 0- a) E )i o o o m o o o o d 0) d c a `o N _ ❑ ❑ ❑ O 0 m m m o a 06 06 .6 m ttm m m 0 0 0 0 a m 'C O N 0 m m O = " O m V O 0 0 N C Co m 0 O w ° E a = W - ?m N - CO'� v N o °v 3 ° c ' c CO -o -0 mmc o3 Novi Et) moa) � N .o � ° EE N .CO o - d N N - > 0. a a) Q 3 L » E N U 0 ICI) p o -c 0 j5 cu _ CD 0) do o5 � vmma>> E ac a O. m w m C O J CO a) a) C „> N m O C O 0 m U am o 7:1__ 3 --8 Oa f3.0_ a3 0 , J .- o)0 c m N O n. O L . .0 C V .- - N O o > N w w CO a) - C m - N u- O N -- N Co - m - c3 g mm 0 u� 3 � J .O - 0) L o m m m > L p L C rO N 6 2m E C0 E «O - a) m Yp 0 w 0) w m ?` w w L 3 w m a C w N C Cl U j > a co N .0 w 0. C O c a) 03 N -0 a) U N L .N m O L N C 2 - E w .� p -o p C - o C ° 0 (0 w C C Co O J o).r, - c O E a) O J o C J O >. I o cn m o o) 0 -' w o L '- O N a) U m ❑ N U 3 - (n N Ql Z N ° O p co a) c V 3 0 .L.. U 2 ro a m m U O. O L O co cu CC > J co c - Q.' L m O N C y a) N N o (a : ,C 0 L C o) O t N fp 0 CO � O ° C C C C O L U 5)L L O 3 w C m w m a > co :c_ C j a) 0 U 0 N a ❑ U 0 ui c o c w 'O c C h d n. m m 0 N N N m C o N U O m o) a mm w comet E 0cE -O `occ �° oa`i 3 ° m v oc `t c u O > > .° o E 2 E E W w CO J - a c awi a m@ d a n o m :o C C E N a N N ,a E V m w N O .0. O m C U o p a O a `p a) 0 a) L a m m L a) J L c y0 c a, co w 0 0 - O m m - o a) — J O -0 d = V N E o cn .c .c aa) H C) aa) H 0 w aa)) I-- -I d o .n Q .0 L 3 < •- 3 0 0 0 > co o c � m co a � m° a .) m R. 00 °) J r N C') Cr- CO r Item C-F79 P524 0 C) 010 w c c E O o ' U v v M Z c+) M CO 0 a) r 0 C a) C Si as) 0 (0 m a) > O C O o V o ,_ L ;c 2 > 0 °a 0 a a a C a N N 0 0 0 0 iii 3 10 u a) E .o aa)) a>) a') Et CL I- > ft M O) >, r C U ,� C C O • j C Q a) 2 u. 0 0 0 d o)0 C a) c :a .5 N 00• 0 0 m m y2 m a O 0 a _ a xa a) N a) N N m a O U C O N U O )p 0) co ", O ,--° 2'w L — C .0 y a L C L O N y • Y .0 L N O a .aN) C -o c .' co a y : N N U 0 C L o) 0 ` 0 N N O J O J J CA E > p N N C Ow O � O O _6 O L N O J V O d o a 0 O _ C O _ O 1] O a) cf N U a) L £ C O m U N C N L t aN> N L C O L 0 N co C o m N w a y c N C -3 N CI- E 0 N - E . N .' L a)0 O N O L E a a 0 O V 4 su5co n tLn Td ti.2-O m b N •aa)) O c > -NO 1- c co m U .0 0 C m o f U O N >, = o o r O N N � !� C = O) n O c N a1 01 OC)- E a0) -O 0) 0 a a) 0 co '- r(a U � c o Q C N a) o) 0 0 c C0 a'D co L-' 'C = - N a1 0 J C O V a) N U a1 C 0 o > a) N O -o C -o m- L CT O E :r N _7 N ' 'O a- (a L C N C o N O 4_ ,D>, c )a N C ` U d a) (,) .c � L. 0 2] (�0 0 m L J) ... N o co 5.. a) 0 0 O Z L 3 d a >, J O o .a- 2 `) 2 N E > @ a C E a a m c N a a) 0 2 -0 Si 0 c -0 E ° c0i aa) Z O L co O .0 C a) C O a) C > -, W O L J c 0 .O -0 N C CO • a) a) >,'0) U C d O CO` N N 3 L O y 0 70 0 0 0 1- 0 a, 0 C) O a) N N N O _ U E "j y 3 C m 0 C O N C L_ mo o- cc � E > cUNgc00 mo e Fc « aa)) c3 O) o) Nwr@7 - d O) N d d 4 N L O 0 o c >L_• N O) ° C E _a) E O ¢ 0 d o N _0 0 0 co .o) d O 00 0-52-' � C - o > > tiN2nf6a > > Eyc ommEd00)) `I cac) > EaEoc � W JNO `mU £ n o o :- U CO - U V a) U ,L N m I 7 aa) c n 02 0 c a) 0 0.y J 't E3 ° 0m3a300 :~ m03 -0 >,dmooN CO o av m mU • • rnm - _ a E 6 ct Item C-F80 P525 . 0 C) c O .0 w a c E o O 'v▪ U C O V . toZ m CO v v N 10 C 0 1E2r d 01 > O c ` ° o U O ,_ L c 2 > °a° a 0 0 °a c 0 0 0 C o n a a. a ° c o o d d d 0 ,_ a- ,- o :0 o o a) °o o O go co a CC 2 C r= N N y a) a a)) a)) y C i- > oe cfiic� w cc rr 0) T co C O 'C C O a) w O r. a in oo N U a) r LL 0 m 0 m m co a 0, d .=_ a C N C C O O 0.5 m z ° °a a °a a) L_ N a) uj O) O). 'O N m - U V a) o c W a) l0 U C C O) C o U a) C C m C_ U Y N N a) ° O O O O o O :C O O j C a) > O 0 0 > � E -oya. .5 052 5) o cdmo 'a '" gym ' mE3 m ° u 0 lococ .pOOOO � c oaaa6- o mo 0Ea ° ° o ° -° E2 N L a) N ry a N N U N 0 ' a) E N E a o 2 E a w 7 N -E ; E o N N E mm NUyEE mo � on0c°) c � n � = a Na) EoEE c )p _ O o OL o c E aa) — a O z tt, o ¢ - c rn.N m m c E 2 ' ° ._ v 3 a Z m >> 0) E o 0 C . O a3 c ° E .9 c d c c ° m � 1§ a) Y a) ar Ca t a o To N a O _N N : o � n L. N ° -0 3 ° j >.� � C a O 2 N O `7' O)� t - -c E d 7 co a) °) a ° °)N E U C) n L C 0 a = N O N _N O a 0 N m O -� 17 U > :C En a) € 2 co Q 'Na - N.Eo dp° � � o � Eca) °) oo = -° c �iai� aoE ° L '� °7OCaoocy fc7oa� .EVo av ° � o3 `mommE T:,, C Q m N N U .N.. N a N > N o 'Q C U U a) a) C P a) o (a cv o o a) c 0 L Z c ° E o > > m = a ai m c a c O m €.. o > Q _ N n a a L _°m 3 C N .° O a) O"L ° o N w 0 o E L m c O N .0 N N C _ a a— fa N y O V O O f0 N o 'C a.o N c C E c C O r0 = O) d CO a n O) O aj a) CO C a a N N Q N 7 o f6 0 7 ° 7 'O a) 3 N f0 c m C m E 5 a) N@ C O L c ° ..J L N 7 C Q N N at a) O) OI a N O C L a] - N 1- C N O)L N N _ 0'mj 15 w 2cL °aamaui � accoacov)8 dEcE `m ° u) c8 n rn ° 2 coo c o ac) c E m- c m -0 o o c E 'c -o ,,,= Q 045 m � aoomotia) Ty • • • st m -0cr0EN22EOEcE • N Item C-F81 I a) P526 a c 0c � c c E 0 0 '0 U C C m o (0 2 v M Cr) v v v v N To •o C 0 F m m m CV > O c C r 0 0 o ._ L t ii d 0 2 > a 0 0 Q Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 C C C - - - a o a a 2 2 2 c a) d d w 0 ,- c c c c m lo co O 0 O o U U U C 0 N a) N 0) O) O) a E > C C C C R > CC a) Cl) o 0 0 0 O) >. M C o •C c w O m • O .• m Co O d V a) 2LL m 0 0 0 0 0 0 co d o) a) .c 72 N C C 0 0 0.2 N• 1••• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a) L L w C = c O c N ai o N N 0 ° c a L L.. �p 0 C a) .0 T O C o) • oaa)) `. to o ° `" >' aa)) o od1 � N 3TEw 3EN � � E C N C C m N C m . ... _ a Q O N N .0 0 0) a) C V N N (a -0 O 0/Y p 003 :5_ U p d O U d C T V O) m a -0 .0 ,> a) > E U = a) c E o a) m 0 a) V c d a L 'v .E a c E o m m p -o a) 12 2 Em m wtm o �VQr Nom ~ m ° V am = N y O �' N C y N a mU O) - . N m a an i oV0aa) V )) oowc- CoaN2 oc0c2 co L2 .n Lm f0 �iE ca.°1 =o- CD V N a) C U O m N V C O T a l— >, T > V 0 N N C .N '_' N E N co a 0) O m N 0 c 0) y a) a. m Oa E;' o o L 3 N m m ca '' ° co N - N C C ,_ t -o O m U V O' a) c a N .N O _... to y N cc.N - o o - $ a rn > o ,- N aai U m o o U o m >. C a c y -a E .o c C N- E N U .o L > V .. C 'N 0 E L O Y C V 'O C N 00 ,0o N m 0 S) d c' ci a) -C N V a) 'C m N > C E C C O L o w N U 2 0 Z r 7, 92 co c2O c -c T O .- O L "6 E U a "a c 00 0) O p N O = c y y CI) o 0 0 o m mL O m E ° E v c N U c c m � 0m 0 03 0 .0 00_ c � m c of o y Q >: > 0 Ol O 2 >") O N T i- > = O m L E m o c 0 d 0) a 0 0 0 0 a-0 N N ca a) m c ' N a E oo o N _ a) C o co m o a) . 0 �� - cDV E0 ) c 0CdOm Dam Imam m � � � o m o).°c_ 2 ` 00 0) c 0 � u .L@ .c E 2c co (.0 u) CC NN -a o p co 12 a) .0 2 c N O• m t� L N V .N M -N0 O 0 •-•-•L >'C N c o N N C • • • cF- 0 ccod -tmLLmU > > 003a aa) Ucm � m • o E (.1 r N c-7-1 Item C-F82 P527 0 0 O .0 -at c E O 0 : v Rc o fn Z V V V C V Cr N N N 01 -0 C a) c 0 15 r O ns C O 0 17 CO 0 •_ L C N 'C 2 > Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 0 c c C C C C C C O O O O O O o U U U U U U j j `J ` J J J C n 0 ',7) !n !n N CO — O• O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O] o 0) 0) 0) CO a 0) c c C _ C C C C a c C C E I— > ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ co C 0 9. O• 0 0 ✓ O C 0-o d a) 2a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ ¢ m . a rn a) .c a p 'y r C C O 0 aM • w 0 0 m m m m 0 0 o To 5 a) 0.) m r U >. c = .c 0 m V o a) C d a) 0 '0 >.'0 ct "O L aJ J .E .E a) 0 3 U l6 3 0 n a) n 0 .0 cn �0 C -0 C a,_ O a = aal .N � a -° CD " 3 E - d o - 0 � 00o' pc 0 0 = .J. 0 'g 0)C 0 @ 3 a 0 ` (0 ` c o n a7 Ul C E_ C 0 C O 0 a 0 y N u) T O '‘ E N N 01 N � (0 0 0 N a N O C N E 7, 2... 8 U 0 C - - 3 - L T _T C Ti) N O y U 0 — co 0 o O Q -0 0 m w -a m 01 0- O n 0 0 0 > 0 C o O N C U - 0 L E (0 o C O C L 0 0 c O a"O V .0 o y a) _c U O N 0 0 ,-./ .3 C o m o C 0 0 J 'J o 0 ci 0 y 0 E y _ C m x C O E r L . c Q y c o c C E E c o E c o o 0 0 E E O >,r3 oEa m rnoo .o o °p a) r. -- 0 W m 'in N .� 0 ov W n 0 0 '0 0 C 0 L C .- CC.)2 m . U -0 C 0 N f0 c N o N E 0 O o N 00 0 0 .O a) n C J O v J C 0 CO y o cC oa ° Ev Cm ° 0 00a o o = 'E coo o m0 O 92 O c 0 0)0 u 0 >. to a c arEi o - a 3 co „, 'o L t` 0 O CO t0 m c > CM a m o co. a 0 v . orn0 00 a E � 03 cl- Z L y !n .0 �p o Q ` r0 (T3 -0 0 n,0 0 0 00 "O 0 al c 0 0 C J .0 J J E 3 T a) in fu E d 0 O `o L a) C C C O OI J a O 0 <0 0 J E -0 U CO Y ` O 0 C 0 N J 0 0 a 0 -0 0 CO .O c o J a) m.- a a 7 () C l�`n 0 C L m U O 0 C U - `.J- 0 a) C L„ 0I a3 l0 C C 13 0 N C `y O 04ou c 0 � � 35QCO � mmtC o - L o - c `0 .0- ° 's � a - U CO 0 O) 0 U O C Q CO a) 3 N O U C n - C N '� .> C N ? 'o 0. O 0 m 0 o J CO Co c O .. _ CO 070JCa1 o r O 2cOic % w EE cc_ 2 ._ > .N a 'y _ n' N e 'O L _ C C U 0 I N N 0 N C 0 u) Ul uJ 0 « E U C C N C 0 a) a 3 0 a 0 = O •Ol5 0 a. ca E n a`s L m E a 0 ma) 2 _c o 'E C 0 0 2 CO = m p -o a d � o ,_•-• m m@ a '5 E S a) c I- 1— co 0V $ co co 1- 0a) co � n � 1— S Qno o .0 W 0O ti 0 .PEE 3a a ca y OI C o = c rL - uJ co r N co V co c0 J r N Item C—F83 P528 a) 0 . c o _° a c E 0 0 '0 U c E o VI Z N N A Y_ -a •C E c L M c a7 > 0 C "6 to o o O V L m 5 2 > 0 c 0 U 7 C N ..- O c Oo)A 0 c w m E i— > 0 co >. M C U 4— O N 0 C 0 Co o a) a) 2 LL Q co a o) a) ao •N .. c c o O O.2 N• i- 0 c 4: .° m c 'O CO Cr) O O cal C V V C O a) O)- a) >,t 0j N O N c N 'N CI C 0 O co co 0 (0 d N O a) a) a)Tf,c N o = a O > N C a] N co C "O N O a) C U D E 9 � N m m ya5 i a� � � DoE � aN = 3 a c c O 2 O C a a - N c o � o O O J a) c a) •O• 3 U N co a N _co an O 7: U a w — @ `y X o > a o C 0 � _ o E a` 0 c Y d y > C ` C co am a � = m m mt co CU _o ° mom (U O = N O co (0 �i ... CU a) O V 0 CO .0 ? > 'O 0I U o)0) O N = ll.l N N O a •,c O) aj . o -c F2) X > 0) m `0 c t- EL °3 3 ` a� ° o � 'a C ? 0 C CZ -G. C c - 0 O L I6 m N N _ V y O O) a) U y N N C OC C U9 0 Y Lll a 01 O > •.� O O a s 00 CD y 3 m E .O` ° 3 c L f6 a) y •N O O a« 3 N N 7 (I o a) N N uj N N a „, m °i ac) N ° U a° 3 c c C C N LN., w N .0 O) (O') V=-. -t cQa c '- aoa aO) - — E - E - in mms - oEc ccE co s@ %n 1-15 N W g U 'E O C O C@ y N N > N I- 0) a) y O) Ca O "O m L_ U N its N C 2 . ? c ' O 3 aa)) _I N c o) = a cv m 0v = E ° 00 D E :12 0 .0 a� c C c O 0 U U • d N To E C O • • • • • • • d N C • • • o) N 0. 2 E Item C—F84 P529 0 0 c O 0 u) c c E O 0 '3 ? ttoo O v v y Z N N N 0 -o 'c a) w a) 0 V > 0 0 c `o o 0 O ,_ – = 2 > 0 0 N N N C C C to to co c a a a O 0 0 0 c CO w a) a) a) E d > > a>) 0) >. � C o O a) .0 0 @ ❑ ❑ O 2 U U 0) 2 ta. ¢ m ao d co d c ao 8 c C O 0 O.M � LII w U 0 0 O -o -0 -0 -o 5 0 o) C >• co a) N N V a) -0 y N -0 0 C 'O O N co Ca N C 0 C 0 0 .cC000a) L '-- C - EornCC L C c�ia c V a) a7 47 a7 j w V ii .5 co N F— a7 o -c N CD O .c L a o a) > > `0 o)= m 'D coa) vt � mo " m � 0 2 aoi o5 -oEo) 0oc , o n3 to o ' awc E aaao � amoc = > > cocn .o_ ua) � o c .o u •c co a O 8 N a)) C a) 0 a a 0 E tp c E C N C N C _o cu – N o m a y m 1 °i E a E C o 0— (a 0) N 0 N E) N E o c a _ t° o a a>> o o •C 0 _ w @ 3 a a 0 > o `O – C 8 o) N c > to C O U to t` E. m 0_ ._> o C .. O N a) Q 0 o 0 mac 2 o C a 0 '5 to = in an ca o C� o @ m'E E m v, o % _ 0 0 __CD al a -0 0 -C - a) E N a L E `° 0° CT- to C 'C a� 2 O .t V o ai C o U a V a) Oct> _. O) O t1 o y •... o a) tT:. E o 0) 4) O 0 E in 0) o@ � c0 rn E _, uaam0 -0 .- 0c � aoio = EcEoo -0co0oa) _ cE ' � .= 3 .0 "0 0o) tnnOC �y � o c - a y c800 coc c0 30 = 7U N o 8 E o c ,na a) (a- as -.G -o c Q 01 0 CO N a y V o m C w-3 03 oI E N0084= c0 -0 ,00 ... c-CI C L c T ` Cl ` C o N l m rn v� d o T ¢ -- m a) . E -o e o a) m a :° . 2 c a) E 0 ,- 0`- o.- I c E '5 > c a = o .x w` o d c = ' '0- O N >. c o ° a) a) 'u u) C o ° CO a 4) 000 47° -71 taa' oE � oaa)) ❑ a' � xd5aa 0) c. aaOa _ a aa)) E ¢ cc 'u) 0)� w . 0I- Eaowa � 0 Tz E • o rn o 92 c ca°)- c ▪ a o r2 E Cr co 0 r N Item C-F85 P530 a) 0 C `o ° coc c E 0 0 0V coot v v ..a- (.0 Z N N N N 0 To F 'C C 0 C F- co d n> a. C O o V co 0 0 2 > a a a 0 N co N N C C C C a) co co co c a a a a o c 0 `o 40 0 CO 0 'r > 0 a°' re c-) C7 T C o C C C O O N O 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 C o m U U U a U 2 LL m m m m 0) co a o, y C A N =' C C o O a2 w ` et w m 0 m m 0 d N 0 C _O N _.. co 0 CD C) N W E O` N N .O ,O N r U a) O U 7 v 2 O a) a) N J E o a o 3 > 0 c 7 0 y o m@ c E a'� v o >d> ONE a Na, .13. 0.w a0 az � OdaU � N 'U � —a co Op) 0 N2 > .- CO CO � 0 _ o `00Oa ?a0CDN • E0' c � a' OaEa � > m N a = 0w a) ° E co m �° L aO a:—°_ 2 C a) i.H Oa 0 c E d m E o)w J o a) . N C U F2O co o `O J -o0 E E o 3 0 ° o C G0 ant D°� E � U F2 N E o d 0 a N E N 0 a c - E a, cE • c d O O N a) W a) L 0) m — T•CO T a) z Z N a3 O, OI O a) a) N y L CL -0 a N N EZ () ° cc >. 0 J _ L J a1 d O -O _ d C 0)L fa a O m J d a) G C co Ti) 2a@w ° `0 -60 = oca' � m >r � OOmg0E � J3caK -- C m m c-= 'JO co a) O N .o N a) w 0 y `. 451= m -5> _° 23.. = _ o • ° o co ac) ° 3 2 a c°'i '" C ` c 1° C 0 E _o > J N d N a, a) 0 Z ` 003 ` 0) 0 ° V ma=-o _ y °? � --6110 = -3a cN ° ° m =_ rC0 ? E0 y C N N r C C N a7 O C w C a3 'j N — O J a7 — `� 0) .J �7 --2 N a a) y 0 iN p) N 'C C O -0 N y z J O N W N C J O a C 3 x O � L.. 7 o N Q O N N V ) a) m O ~ "=. 0) .- U L m N a) T)- N N N > 0 CT L.. N O C N a) .O V Tu > « N > a) C la C) U E Y L C "- L a) y C L E io 0 c a V y C J :V ❑ V O 2 . NaEo d -'co co 0E > NCE � Oya > c u ° a a2aE N aN C ° = (1) O 7 O J N 0 — 0 020 -° J O O N c J X — o 3 N 000 co .2 2 ❑ in cb6 .N a. aoo0Owm00NoO Q ° a � me 200co a) a) 0c '0 E m a` co ° a arm aE N Ez m -3 co ° a 7. CL Co E h Cr' ui U' Item C-F86 P531 0 0 c O 10 - a c E O 0 'v U N O V V O Z cv N Q Q Q Q N To a C 0 C Fc d o V N CO > O w C "0 u o ._ L F ddU U 2 > a a C C C C O O O O • N N 0 0 0 0 C C `J 2 2 Co Co C o a CO CO N N w C C C C O O O 0 0 0 0 m V 3 3 C O N O) 0) co 0) Et CO C C C N 0 7 ❑ ❑ C P-- O 00 U y 2LLm m o o U U o) co 0- CO O C a o N C C O O am • CO CO 0 CO❑ a ❑a ❑a ❑a 0 o a-a)) 0c N co CD CO C aa)) o CO m .0 E 0 co comae t° m °c of CN@v0'« « NO .2Ef00v J « ~ a) NCC OC3 @ Ca @Nr@• J N C I'm O N ~ m 0 @ E C LA T E " Y O@ 0 Tic a) 0 0 .ca 0 5 c c N .o � ° « c ¢ o o = E m `m 0 . .-. CCD a CD ti o) 0) >„_c 0 CO° 0 0 o 0 N 7 O. @ U E >, c w >, 0 c a) C ,p « -0 a) a y Co j C 'O N m a U ' Co @ c s C O N ` -0 L 5Y O a O) N L CD � � � ca as o E ` 2 � .c `� m � co o @ 3 osL�- 3 .4 mE ->, aai ac) o c ;v @ 5c)n@- aJo . mx ta>r °oYE � m0 = o ,0po c Ca) U ° E3 co m ,E � y � ooN � E EdoocE - 1 000 acicom cmE � v pcLrJac ui tLnENE6- o000w mm2 ,_ cE 3a � 0Z@a _c >, - 0Ot90cochi ° Nao. ZC C -0 -00- E >, @mo V 0 a ° 0m ra) 0) cNCo 'c .03 ca - 0Lc ? c a ,otp 0 o a@ N 0 N , N @ E U C L L .3 . E L 0 C f6 « c r O E N `. d @ = CO 0 1- « y ry m e N 0_ c a7) Q - mar3c6o ° c ry 0. 7 « - @ > � 072 Eaa)i @c @ °) $ • a) Lo � ~ c « y � m.E � LV, o)—,>. 0 optiEcoZ ` a22 ° NC 0 E0 20cc2 � o20 � co N � ._ No @m - C -04-- 4-- a) @d o E o � � > "' COO =C O o 0> N C a) N L a) @ 0 0 O r O O a) @ C to N N cm 0 N@ C C O C@ O.« ton 7-- e _10 .25 @ 0 co E .-S I' H Cl- . a V) c O w a 2 n N E U 7 > 0 00 a d 0 N@ O C F. G U EF.,--) th (A r N M [- Item C-F87 P532 0) U ` C R � a c E 0 O 7.. (.) C 0 fl Q Q ¢ Q Q Q c Q N A 'O C C N C F a) c ,,. a) co > 0 C ma 9 O O 0 tF d 2 > Q C Q C Q ¢ C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U 2 2 2 2 2 > > a C 17) i N N N N N N 0 0 O 0 O O O O O O 0 CO U 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 U 0) CO 0) 0) 0) 0) a 0) C w C C C C C C C C (e) O) T C U w .0 C 0 • j N o d C C' r 2u. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn Cu CI_ C) o c•7i co C C O O a2 ca O ,° ❑a ❑a ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ a a a a a - L_ %1 773 d 0) a1 - O) N o a) T W a) • T C N T C � 07 . N N N Y Y N L O CO � L .� L... o .. O U E 0 C • co d p• 3 N O y c .T. CO m a N .D d o C 0 ` C .0 c .5 9 0) o c co ry U a 0 t m v o N 3 cu co a 0' E C co U) N - d ow ] >� N C C N ^' O) Y co N O 0O > w (O• •a) O p A a.• 0) U C y v O N L a _0 CO r O T N c0 ❑ E 0 r Cu E O) 0 c O L =_ O cn d - C O) U y ;0 C o n ~ C T aa C O co `O a C OS 0 0) cO E N 3 U C W L a p N O> ca 0) 3 C O. -o -o- 0 N -- o ca N a o L L a T'- co N L w CO C a O N 'OCO co '5 as OYc o 0 0) 0 " NN - E L o c _ N . > CO CD x c U 0- 3 U U co C O co N O - c L a 0) c0 N N O o 0 U U y y E O 0) O ■co co 4 a cri U ul 1] U U ... S] O co ro o en 0 C U r.-. O)co X co M N c` c 0 O O a O) 0)..• CO O 0) C C a) mooc° oCc) oo .oaaa) c � � m coo NYE ccocco co VCO0cot c o ow — o =o Z 0 V 0 = m L 0 'D N O a C N y 0 C O U 0 C 0 O • 0 t/) a' c) _ ,C 0 a (,..y; 0 0) C .-JO Oct 0 U O' N C Co N a) -7.5 O)yO 2 U O CO .`. x O O T a) N O - T U L,,, V E d ._ ` '� a) 0 N co O N 0) cO U > a) .0 O '00 c j > O L Vi @ O N al 0 C C a N O O 3 O U 0 0 N (0 -5 'o C C �. C O N U L O "O O y @ C O '� O) N co j N C R O C O C ` C C C y 0 0 aL y C a '0 d QI W U co O U T O a N O N U C o V O c O U a L cO «O g c Y U a 0 a «� m a N 0) N p a U a o a o OU N c ti U 0)- 0 co Coo> is N CD O O u) a) 0 co L a) 0) cc — a .. 0 0 0 . cm cyo m U) c33a) c01 > 00 N > 041 '5 50000 nosE0 .c 0 - 00 _c- 0 2 co 'EoE LLao 0a) cE 0x0c .cod '7. E -o 0 -c 0ao Htia) d 1- o o) � ;ti a HUacu Hao F3 me Uao �. 0 a) ❑ Eyc0 :; a 1• n !0 o rn Or r r Item C-F88 P3 ƒ ) R ; E \ ! k § § } $ ! 3 ; « & � k c CO 45 g / 2 , / \ : k ) } § } \ o277 { 2 ! # t ) . f ; a9 ; ] ! ! ) } f9 ! ! 9 � � ■ , , , , in co r- C ] ) 2 • ) J \ \ � \ o \ 8.- - » G § kc \ % 15 g o / c¥ a ; ( t ! ) t a a � z2 / ! w > 3 2 2 ) ! \ k a0000 00 f ; : G : /CO ) ƒ u o a) . >4 ( g , / xi o a" ) r zc \k 0 ■ ® § 2fr co a E 0 7 § \ 2 a ) - - . 71 ; 00 � a ] ZZ4-IC ( { ( ${a ± ) a / / � ; : G : � 7 { \ * � �22i ) k {� ® ® \\ /qo >1 � } \ \ \ \\ } \\� 0 - a \ � : = - - - l2 � : _ m : \57 © / ` @2aa { • E - 0) c ` k7 ) f - / § $ , = a/ ® / « ) } ) co F6 ( ] ; \ : ƒ _ % 2 - , _ : -- CD - { 2 , Ecoco RS •-• § \ ! t . ! H fa ) l - - \ _ - j ! st \ / / \ \ k � }// \ .C £ \ \ ) a � ® ` 0$ >,a) Z0 ° = ■ ) > { \ w , ( m ) � ] : # § § 2222 ; ` } ; f) 2j = a § fa22a }« � § ` ° / t � faaa ! 11111111 g B f / ± Y & 8 2 2 ) Item cF ,a P534 P535 RESOLUTION NO. 15-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00560, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM PARK (P) TO LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 6.5 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE IN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF— APN: 1089-011-04. A. Recitals. 1. Caldwell Land Solutions filed an application for the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of March 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the School (S) Zoning District; and b. The project site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north to south; and c. To the north, south and east is single-family development within the Low Medium (LM) Zoning District; to the west is a public park within the Park (P) Zoning District; and d. The General Plan land use designation is Park (P) and the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation is School (S). The City has no plans to develop the site as a park and the school district has determined that the site is not needed as a school site; and e. The applicant is requesting to change the General Plan land use designation to Low Medium (LM) residential, in conformance with the existing zoning designations for the residential development to the north, south and east; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-18 P536; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00560 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 2 f. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development in that the proposed Amendment will change the land use designation to be consistent with the land use designation of the properties to the north south and east; and g. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element in that General Plan Land Use Policy LU-3.7 encourages development of vacant land in built-out areas. The vacant project site is surrounded by residential development to the north, south and east that is of a similar size and layout and will become part of the larger community; and h. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The properties to the north, south and east are developed with single-family residences with the same zoning designation as the proposed project site and will not be negatively impacted by the approval of this General Plan Amendment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size and compatibility with the existing land uses in the surrounding area. The project site will be developed with single-family residences of similar size, layout and density as the existing lots to the north, south and east and will be accessed by an adjacent public street. b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties in that the proposed General Plan Amendment will change in the land use designation from Park(P)to Low Medium (LM),which is the same land use designation as the properties to the north, south and east. c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan in that the project site is surrounded by residential development with the same land use designation to the north, south and east and will be developed in conformance with the development criteria of the proposed land use designation. Further,the project site is surrounded by residential development to the north, south and east that is of a similar size and layout and will become part of the larger community. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative P537 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-18 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00560 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 • Page 3 Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested General Plan Amendment. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730,telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment application as shown in Attachment "A" subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is to change the General Plan land use designation from Park (P)to Low Medium (LM) residential as shown in Attachment"A"for 6.5 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive; APN: 1089-011-04. 2) Approval is contingent of City Council approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561. 3) Approval is to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such • P538 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-18 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00560 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 4 approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents, officers,or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation • shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 'a�ti� \ Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: /N Candy'-urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ , OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE •S 5 z vAVb'j b, . . � j � _ 39 C t 0 b'rnsaw 33N3t101,1 ONIdOI2d0d y. o II I... u i p�SA 4'o C Q 0AN 0 atra‘E 3 z as VAS°, earl o 3 r a O 0 < 07731Sba b o W J — Af!(b7yp It . 14:: + oy,� . tree 4' s ' O 1—v , c P cy) . 4111114v ; - . k — cn yy. ....._ -SOVIii .1.)j — :: ' . - - .. ---°k161"..:".. :atom/ a) te, i.* ..:. ,f 2 11111 4orned 4 y 0 �ypl.Stt3NIWIS 0wa3iEid _. N3W7U8 0 Ont 1b9 2 A.-4 CD 1 IMO fa . ._ 41111111. . 0 N01S3�17b9 r . :: (7) kit M Z` s - 0 651 °` i - Y Q 0 00°1 $ : 0 • V 0 ►+ a o puo�4 __ _ g o 5 . 0 0 ., v , _ ___-* Asagsiog .Otl0dlbb I 5 4 ALBERTA . 4. i.. N/lsnb t� 4. Attachment A a L kit, .,K P540 RESOLUTION NO. 15-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FROM SCHOOL(S)TO LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 6.5 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE IN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089-011-04. A. Recitals. 1. Caldwell Land Solutions filed an application for the approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of March 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the School (S) Zoning District; and b. The project site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north to south; and c. To the north, south and east is single-family development within the Low Medium (LM) Zoning District; to the west is a public park within the Park (P) Zoning District; and d. The General Plan land use designation is Park (P) and the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation is School (S). The City has no plans to develop the site as a park and the • school district has determined that the site is not needed as a school site; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-19 P541, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 2 e. The applicant is requesting to change the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation to Low Medium (LM) residential, in conformance with the existing land use designations for the residential development to the north, south and east of the project site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the development,within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. As a Land Use Policy, the General Plan states that new development should be accommodated in a manner that integrates it into the physical structure of the City, is a logical extension of existing infrastructure improvements and there are adequate public services available to serve the development. The proposed zoning amendment will implement the Land Use Policies outlined above and will not be inconsistent with the density or quality of existing development within the Victoria Community Plan area and the City. b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code which in turn are consistent with and implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan. These goals include promoting the economical and efficient use of land, promoting design and construction techniques that are responsive to the environment, and promoting development compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed zoning amendment will result in development that is consistent with these goals and objectives and will be indistinguishable in overall quality and design from existing development in the surrounding area. c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed zoning amendment will not increase the density of development in the surrounding area and will thus not increase traffic in a manner that is beyond what the roads were designed to accommodate or overwhelm the existing public facilities in the surrounding area; and d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The General Plan states that the Low Medium (LM) designation is characterized by detached and attached housing structures that contain either one or two individual dwelling units with a density range of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning amendment will be fully compliant with the General Plan; and e. In conjunction with the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560, the proposed amendment will be consistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The Development Code states that the Low Medium (LM) zoning district is intended as an area for low medium density single-family or multi-family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with the nearby single-family neighborhoods. The project site is being subdivided for the development of single-family residences at a density of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre and will become an integral part of the surrounding area. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts based upon the findings as follows: • P542 , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-19 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 3 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested Victoria Community Plan Amendment. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730,telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the Victoria Community Plan application as shown in Attachment "A" subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is to change the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation from School (S) to Low Medium (LM) residential as shown in Attachment "A" for 6.5 acres of land located northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive from Park (P) to Low Medium (LM) Residential; APN: 1089-011-04. 2) Approval is contingent of City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560. 3) Approval is to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project and the Mitigated Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein. P543 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-19 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 4 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: .. e� Ja---,--C� ���c'= Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman \ _ `_.3 ATTEST: . -.. 111. `'`e andyc- :urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ , OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r ikl e aabd 1:I 1:• I I --- f,.Q i Le „,,,,---0—V 1-r) fA ' 'z.L.al ; k ies ---ONIti till) 1,,ti. r 9 t S+1' L Ji Poxes 11..itz'. 0 ti W 10"-73-1 MtS53V� 3JN3a0 4 (5 J 2XOd _---) (._ J I>L0 41 a pNroN., }��t\ c___-) 1-1‘,_( . _j 1 ----r\ E --,\ _ii 2_,,:i% .._ il Ou 1 ! ag\ p RTA e ..., 15 4:11 , 0 a Crio.Y.*Thl- g t ay 0 N. ,) r clO 3 Go, -'�� oo. �� >ye--1 ) 1 0 1,‘, 0 —I t _ s — nv�ass da bl *I .4f G.441 ' ! fro 109 vaYO�y 4' ind Q , v i D U ? �Ma tia� err(N a !e t i - Q e �p I= Q VW_ 1 i$ "�f- ocsawwrY �_ —o�b�a n analvvw _ C / ( Q!4_ N9 .dffl OI 1 In 1tT9 �/ ` a Li- r , — __J C) % A. A I +�(f 2 � �A OS WHO tilt)t1 � • ��r� � �}pjt �a. P s CL.`-._ lDNna is o % -_, :11 ‘ «.(A Opl01"Gr 3 t1 I A 60 ) I \I 1 PUftD i xp a I it f u S 1°4 br D(F-1 4di • a Attachment A () nil-}e ks--t_ 0 P545 RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 6.5 ACRES OF LAND INTO 31 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS FOR A SITE THAT IS ZONED SCHOOL (S) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089-011-04. A. Recitals. 1. Caldwell Land Solutions filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of March 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 11,2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the School (S)Zoning District; and b. The project site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north to south; and c. To the north, south and east is single-family development within the Low Medium (LM)Zoning District; to the west is a public park within the Park (P)Zoning District; and d. The General Plan land use designation is Park (P) and the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation is School (S). The City has no plans to develop the site as a park and the school district has determined that the site is not needed as a school site; and e. The applicant is concurrently requesting to change the General Plan and Victoria Community Plan land use designations to Low Medium (LM) residential, in conformance with the existing zoning designations for the residential development to the north, south and east; and I' P546 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 2 f. The project is designed to conform to all related development criteria for the Low Medium(M)Development District of the Victoria Community Plan,except for the depth of Lot#19. In conjunction with Tentative Tract SUBTT18508, the applicant has submitted a Variance application (DRC2014-01117) requesting a reduction in the lot depth requirement; and g. The Victoria Community Plan requires a minimum lot width of 50 feet and minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. The Community plan also requires that lots 55 feet wide or greater have a lot size of 6,000 square feet to provide variety. The project complies with each of these requirements; and h. The smallest lot size in the development is 5,025 square feet and the largest lot size is 11,210 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,807 square feet, exceeding the 5,500 square foot average lot size requirement; and i. The project includes 3 lettered lots that will be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District in the area. Lot"A" is on the south side of Lark Drive and was created in order to permit the intersection of the new project street and Lark Drive to line up. Lots"B"and "C"were created in order to provide line-of-site visibility for the project's interior streets where they intersect with Kenyon Way,which is curvilinear along the project boundary.The Engineering Department has agreed to accept dedication and maintenance of the lettered lots. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code,and any applicable specific plans in that as part of this application there is also a related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00560) and Victoria Community Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00561) changing the land use and zoning designations of the General Plan and Victoria Community Plan to Low Medium(LM)Residential.The project is designed to comply with all of the development criteria for the Low Medium (LM) Development District of the Victoria Community Plan, except for the lot depth of Lot#19.A Variance application(DRC2014-01117)for the reduction of lot depth for this lot is included as part of the requested entitlements. The project will have a density of 4.7 dwelling units per acre, within the permitted density range of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. b. In conjunction with the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Victoria Community Plan Amendment, the design or improvements of the tentative tract will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans with approval the approval of the related General Plan Amendment (DRC2014-00560), Victoria Community Plan (DRC2014-00561) and Variance (DRC2014-01117). The project site is being subdivided for residential purposes and will be of similar size and density to the single-family residential development in the surrounding area. c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the project is designed to conform to all of the related development criteria of the Low Medium (LM) Development District of the Victoria Community Plan, except for the lot depth of Lot #19 and the corresponding Variance application for lot depth.The project site is surrounded by similar residential development to the north, south and east, is accessed by an adjacent public street and will connect to existing utility services. • ( P547 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 3 d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat in that the Initial Study prepared for the project includes mitigation measures that reduce any potential impacts to humans or wildlife to less than significant; e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems in that the lots are being subdivided for residential purposes and will not include the use of hazardous materials that would cause public health problems; f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision as the subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use of the project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative • Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings,the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested Tentative Tract entitlement. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730,telephone (909) 477-2750. ,s+ P548 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 for the subdivision of 6.5 acres under into 31 lots for a site located northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive; APN: 1089-011-04. 2) Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Variance DRC2014-01117 and City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561 and their adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein for all project components. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. Air Quality Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 0 P549 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 5 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. . • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCBJ)daily to reduce Particulate Matter(PM10)emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 1) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 2) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. P550 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 6 3) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 4) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either(a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation;or(b)the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. 2) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, a Burrowing Owl Survey that conforms to the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review. The survey shall include a habitat assessment,survey and impact analysis. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important,and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping 0 1) P551 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 7 or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original- illustrations, to the San Bernardino County ' Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource(i.e. plant or animal fossils)are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PMio emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,() emissions from the site during such episodes. • O 0 P552 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 8 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gasses Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping fD P553 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 9 • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project.if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activity 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 0 P55 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 10 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 3) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole and Associates (September 14, 2014) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise 1) Construct a sound wall that is a minimum 6 feet above the pad elevation along the perimeter of the ground-floor backyards for all residences adjacent to Kenyan Way. The barrier shall be some combination of berms and concrete masonry units (CMUs). 2) Install a mechanical ventilation system such as a mechanical fan or air- conditioning system for all dwelling units with direct line of sight to Kenyon Way traffic. i ( P555 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 11 3) Construct a minimum 5-foot high sound barrier on each balcony/deck facing Kenyon Way and/or within 30 feet of the Kenyon Way centerline. The sound wall shall be constructed with a combination of wood and Plexiglas, with no gaps. 4) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 5) During all project site excavation and grading,the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, sixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards 6) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 7) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 8) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 10) The applicant shall submit a noise study when the houses on the lots are submitted for approval to verify compliance with the City's noise standards. 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. ( 0 P556 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-20 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18508 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 12 13) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday • or a national holiday. .Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: C\ � Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman 1 J ATTEST: ■ _s Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL., MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P557 „or Conditions of Approval ;a anis [RWCHO lAuCamoNne Community Development Department Project #: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. When house product is submitted in the future, the applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department • and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 2. When house product is submitted in the future, a final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The future residences on the approved lots require separate design review and approval. . 4. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 5. The applicant. shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT18508 and Variance DRC2014-01117 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 and Victoria Community Plan DRC2014-00561. 7. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 8. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 1wA4.City0IRC.us Printed:3/10/2015 ( ( P558 Project#: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2o14-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 9. Approval of Variance DRC2014-01117 shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 10. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 11. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 12. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 15. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 16. Following occupancy, all parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 17. Following occupency, all site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Printed:3/10/2015 w✓w.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 10 P559 Project #: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 18. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter to match the walls in the surrounding area except along the. new extension of Lark''Drive where decorative open- tubular steel fencing is permitted. 19. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map B. Engineering Services Department 0. 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 2. 1. "A" Street, Grimaldi Road and Lark Drive to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential"Standards and the Victoria Community Plan including but not limited to the following: a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, knuckle, drive approaches, curb adjacent sidewalk, ADA ramps, catch basins and storm drains, as required. b. Provide a minimum concrete thickness of 6 inches for sidewalks at driveways per City Standard No. 101. c. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, as required d. Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. 3. This project is connected to or will disrupt existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation areas, including a paseo along the south tract boundary and Kenyon Park along the west tract boundary. ' Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing areas' condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area. 4. Kenyon Way to be improved in accordance with City "Collector Street' standards and Victoria Community Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a. Provide catch basin north of Lark Drive. b. Provide"All Way" stop signs at the intersection of Lark Drive and Kenyon Way. c. Revise existing street improvement and storm drain plans as required by the City Engineer d. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter, sidewalk and streetlights. e. Protect or provide traffic signing, R26(s) signs and striping, as required. f. No residential driveways to Kenyon Way are permitted. g. Parkway shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to the right-of-way. 5. Existing private storm drain easement per Parcel Map 11105 shall be vacated. Printed:3/10/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 at 10 ( P560 • Project#: SUBT718508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 6. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall . . be. paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. -The- deposit is fully refundable if. at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 7. Lots A, B and C shall be maintained by the City. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and. approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits. It shall be consistent with existing adjacent LMD areas. 8. Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 9. Since all sidewalks are curb adjacent, no street trees will be required. 10. Sidewalk on the east edge of Kenyon Park, shown to be relocated 10 feet from the tract boundary to accommodate the proposed perimeter wall, shall be coordinated with the City's Park Development Section. 11. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 13. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 14. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 15. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 16. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. Printed:3/1012015 www.CltyofRC.us Page 4 of 10 0 P561 Project#: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, 0RC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 17. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: • 'A" Street Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk • Drive Approach Street Lights 18. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed:3/10/2015 www.CilyofRC.us Page 5 a/10 f` P562 Project #: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, 0RC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 20. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map -- approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: Los A, B and C 21. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 22. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 23. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Grimaldi Road Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights 24. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Kenyon Way Access Ramps 25. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 26. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed:3/10/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 10 0 P563 Project #: SUBTTI8508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 27. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Lark Drive Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights 28. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 29. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 30. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Kenyon Way Botanical Name- Eucalyptus nicholii Common Name- Nichols Willow-leafed Peppermint Min. Grow Space - 5' Spacing - 35' O.C. Size- 15-Gallon . Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. E. Grading Section 1. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. Printed:3/10/2015 www.CilyofRC.us Page 7 of 10 r (. P564 Project #: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, 0RC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 2. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit... .The grading agreement- and. bond -- . shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 3. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 4. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; H) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 6. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 7. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 8. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 9. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 10. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 11. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. Printed:3/10/2015 Page 8 of 10 tD P565 Project#: SUBTT18508 CE0A2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, 0RC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-let single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 12. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be . .. completed, .submitted,.. and approved...by the- Building•. and Safety Official prior to • the issuance•-of ••- building permits. 13. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 14. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 15. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 16. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 17. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 20. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 21. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 22. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 23. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 24. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Printed:3/10/2015 www.CityofRC.u9 Page 9 of 10 rl " P566 Project#: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section Printed:3/10/2015 www.CitycfRC.US Page 10 of 10 0 0 P567 RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2014-01117, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE 90 FOOT LOT DEPTH REQUIREMENT TO 73 FEET FOR LOT #19 OF TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT18508(31 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY SUBDIVISION)FOR SITE ZONED SCHOOL (S) LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE IN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1089-011-04. _ A. Recitals. 1. Caldwell Land Solutions filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2014- 01117 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of March 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 11,2015, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the School (S) Zoning District; and b. The project site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north to south; and c. To the north, south and east is single-family development within the Low Medium (LM) Zoning District; to the west is a public park within the Park (P) Zoning District; and d. The General Plan land use designation is Park (P) and the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation is School (S). The City has no plans to develop the site as a park and the school district has determined that the site is not needed as a school site; and e. The project is designed to conform to all related development criteria for the Low Medium (M) Development District of the Victoria Community Plan, except for lot depth for Lot#19; and E' ; P568 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 2 f. A Variance has been has been requested to reduce the required lot depth of Lot #19 from 90 feet to 73 feet.The depth of Lot#19 was reduced by a corner cutoff required to provide visibility for oncoming traffic at the intersection of Kenyon Way and Grimaldi Road. The Development Code defines lot depth as the horizontal distance between the midpoint of the front lot line and the midpoint of the rear lot line. The lot is approximately 114 feet deep along the west property line and approximately 20 feet deep along the east property line.At the midpoint, the lot is approximately'73feet deep, 17 feet less than the 90-foot minimum lot depth requirement. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Without the reduction in the lot depth requirement, the applicant would be required to eliminate Lot #19,which meets all other development criteria and can be developed with a single-family residence that meets all remaining development criteria. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The project site is adjacent to a wide curve in a public street, Kenyon Way, which limits vehicular visibility at the intersection of Kenyon Way and a new extension of Grimaldi Road. The visibility issue has been resolved by providing a corner cutoff adjacent to the subject intersection,which in turn creates a physical limitation on Lot#19 from meeting the required 90 foot lot depth. c. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Without a reduction in the lot depth requirement, the applicant would be required to eliminate Lot #19, thus increasing the size of the adjacent lots to where the lots are much larger than the other lots in the surrounding area and limiting the development potential of the project site when all other development criteria can be achieved. d. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. It is common practice to grant Variances for a reduction in a development criteria where there is a physical limitation restricting compliance with that criteria. In this case, a corner cutoff created to provide vehicle visibility at the intersection of Kenyon Way and a new extension of Grimaldi Road, which restricts Lot#19 from complying with the lot depth requirement. e. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Variance will not negatively impact the properties in the surrounding area as the lot is of adequate size to be developed with a single-family residence that meets all City development requirements and will not be visibly different from the other residences in the area. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project C 0 P569 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 3 will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to approving the requested Variance. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730,telephone (909)477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Variance for a 17 foot reduction in the 90 foot lot depth requirement for Lot #17 of Tentative Tract Map 18508 for a site located northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive; APN: 1089-011-04. 2) Approval is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 and City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561 and their adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and all mitigations contained therein for all of the project components. • 0 0 P570 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 4 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. Air Quality . • .. Short Tenn (ConsfructiorQ Em'issions-' .. . . 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their'use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be,applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. ` . P571 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 5 • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB])daily to reduce Particulate Matter(PM10)emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long term Emissions 1) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 2) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 3) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 4) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation; or(b)the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of P572 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 • Page 6 independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. 2) Prior to approval of a Grading Permit, a Burrowing Owl Survey that conforms to the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. •• Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites,capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed' mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource(i.e. plant or animal fossils)are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further • mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: 0 P573 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 7 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has . completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery; -• - •• •. • the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gasses Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 P574 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 8 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 5) Construction should be timed'so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic: ' • - 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials • that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. P575 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 9 • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activity 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading. and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National • Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 0 P576 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 10 Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 3) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole and Associates (September 14, 2014) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise 1) Construct a sound wall that is a minimum 6 feet above the pad elevation along the perimeter of the ground-floor backyards for all residences adjacent to Kenyan Way. The barrier shall be some combination of berms and concrete masonry units (CMUs). 2) Install a mechanical ventilation system such as a mechanical fan or air- conditioning system for all dwelling units with direct line of sight to Kenyon Way traffic. 3) Construct a minimum 5 foot high sound barrier on each balcony/deck facing Kenyon Way and/or within 30 feet of the Kenyon Way centerline.The sound wall shall be constructed with a combination of wood and Plexiglas,with no gaps. 4) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 5) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, sixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards r J 0 P577 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 11 6) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 7) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 8) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 10) The applicant shall submit a noise study when the houses on the lots are submitted for approval to verify compliance with the City's noise standards. 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 13) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. i CD P578 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-21 VARIANCE DRC2014-01117 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES MARCH 11, 2015 Page 12 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ._ - \ BY! tia a 1 � ��, , >:1.) Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman \� ATTEST: i ( l`CtL- Candyc- :urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P579 Conditions of Approval ►.s h rRLYCrro (,UCAMONGA Community Development Department Project #: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. When house product is submitted in the future, the applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 2. When house product is submitted in the future, a final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The future residences on the approved lots require separate design review and approval. . 4. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18508 shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 5. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT18508 and Variance DRC2014-01117 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00560 and Victoria Community Plan DRC2014-00561. 7. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 8. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. ww Printed:3/10/2015 w.CilyofPC.us ( P580 Project#: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 9. Approval of Variance DRC2014-01117 shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use- has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 10. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 11. In those instances requiring long term 'monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 12. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 15. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 16. Following occupancy, all parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 17. Following occupency, all site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Printed:3/10/2015 wsvw.CityofRC.U9 Page 2 of 10 P581 Project#: SU8TT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 18. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter to match the walls .. in the surrounding area except along the new extension of Lark Drive where decorative open tubular steel fencing is permitted. 19. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map B. Engineering Services Department 0. • 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 2. 1. "A" Street, Grimaldi Road and Lark Drive to be improved in accordance with City "Local Residential"Standards and the Victoria Community Plan including but not limited to the following: a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, knuckle, drive approaches, curb adjacent sidewalk, ADA ramps, catch basins and storm drains, as required. b. Provide a minimum concrete thickness of 6 inches for sidewalks at driveways per City Standard No. 101. c. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, as required d. Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. 3. This project is connected to or will disrupt existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation areas, including a paseo along the south tract boundary and Kenyon Park along the west tract boundary. Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing areas' condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area. 4. Kenyon Way to be improved in accordance with City "Collector Street' standards and Victoria Community Plan standards, including but not limited to the following: a. Provide catch basin north of Lark Drive. • b. Provide"All Way" stop signs at the intersection of Lark Drive and Kenyon Way. c. Revise existing street improvement and storm drain plans as required by the City Engineer d. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter, sidewalk and streetlights. e. Protect or provide traffic signing, R26(s) signs and striping, as required. f. No residential driveways to Kenyon Way are permitted. g. Parkway shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to the right-of-way. 5. Existing private storm drain easement per Parcel Map 11105 shall be vacated. • Printed:3/10/2015 www.CityafRC.us Page 3 of 10 ( 0 P582 Project #: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, 0RC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, 0RC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 6. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall . be . paid. for..-the. .Construction. and Demolition. Diversion Program. - The-deposit is fully •refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project 7. Lots A, B and C shall be maintained by the City. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map . approval or issuance of building permits. It shall be consistent with existing adjacent LMD areas. 8. Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 9. Since all sidewalks are curb adjacent, no street trees will be required. 10. Sidewalk on the east edge of Kenyon Park, shown to be relocated 10 feet from the tract boundary to accommodate the proposed perimeter wall, shall be coordinated with. the City's Park Development Section. 11. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 13. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 14. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 15. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 16. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. Printed:3/10/2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 10 ( P583 • Project/t: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, 0RC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance • ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 17. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: 'A" Street Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach • Street Lights 18. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Printed:3/10/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 10 t P584 Project#: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 • Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineerincj Services Department 20. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the •Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: Los A, B and C 21. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 22. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the . CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 23. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Grimaldi Road Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights 24. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Kenyon Way Access Ramps 25. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 26. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe 'and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed:3/10/2015 vw+w.Cit,orRC.U4 Page 6 of 10 • 0 0 P585 Project#: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, 0RC2014-00561, 0RC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineering Services Department 27. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Lark Drive Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement • • Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights 28. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 29. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 30. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall bepperlthehpublic)lands ape improvement plans. Kenyon Way Botanical Name-Eucalyptus nicholii Common Name-Nichol's Willow-leafed Peppermint Min. Grow Space- 5' Spacing -35' O.C. Size- 15-Gallon . Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. E. Grading Section 1. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. Printed:3/10/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 10 0 P586 Project#: SUBTT18508 CE0A2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 2. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement- and- bond - • • shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 3. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout'Information for Grading Plans and Permit'. 4. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 8. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 7. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed 'Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 8. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 9. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 10. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 11. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. Printed:3/10/2015 www.CiryofRC.us Page 8 of 10 i P587 Project#: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, 0RC2014-00560, DRC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 12. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be _.... _..,_ completed, submitted, and.. approved by the.- Building and Safety Official prior—to''the-"issuance" of • building permits. 13. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 14. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 15. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 16. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 17. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 20. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 21. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations, 22. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that,flow lines exceed 10 percent 23. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 24. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. rinte0:3/10/2015 www.cityorric.us Page 9 of 10 0 f P588 Project#: SUBTT18508 CEQA2014-00004, DRC2014-00560, 0RC2014-00561, DRC2014-01117 Project Name: 31-lot single-family residential subdivision Location: - 108901104-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section noted:3/10/2015 www.CiryO(RC.u3 Page 10 of 10 P589 ORDINANCE NO. 877 AN ORDINACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561,A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FROM SCHOOL(S)TO LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR A 6.5 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND LARK DRIVE IN THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1089-011-04. A. Recitals. 1. On March 11, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Victoria Community Plan Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof,adopted its Resolution No. 15-19, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Victoria Community Plan Amendment. 2. On the 3rd day of June 2015, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the proposed amendment and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 3, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The ordinance applies to a property located on the northwest corner of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive in the School (S) Zoning District; and b. The project site is approximately 650 feet from east to west and 400 feet from north to south; and c. To the north, south and east is single-family development within the Low Medium (LM) Zoning District; to the west is a public park within the Park (P) Zoning District; and d. The Victoria Community Plan zoning designation for the project site is School (S). The Etiwanda School District has determined that the site is not needed as a school site; and e. The amendment will change the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation to Low Medium (LM) residential, in conformance with the existing land use designations for residential development to the north, south and east of the project site. P590 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 877 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES JUNE 3, 2015 Page 2 f. The amendment will bring the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation for the project site into conformance with the General Plan Land Use Map. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the development,within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. As a Land Use Policy, the General Plan states that new development should be accommodated in a manner that integrates it into the physical structure of the City, is a logical extension of existing infrastructure improvements and there are adequate public services available to serve the development. The proposed zoning amendment will implement the Land Use Policies outlined above and will not be inconsistent with the density or quality of existing development within the Victoria Community Plan area and the City. • b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code which in turn are consistent with and implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan. These goals include promoting the economical and efficient use of land, promoting design and construction techniques that are responsive to the environment, and promoting development compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed zoning amendment will result in development that is consistent with these goals and objectives and will be indistinguishable in overall quality and design from existing development in the surrounding area. c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed zoning amendment will not increase the density of development in the surrounding area and will thus not increase traffic in a manner that is beyond what the roads were designed to accommodate or overwhelm the existing public facilities in the surrounding area; and d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The General Plan states that the Low Medium (LM) designation is characterized by detached and attached housing structures that contain either one or two individual dwelling units with a density range of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed zoning amendment will be fully compliant with the General Plan; and e. The proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The Development Code states that the Low Medium (LM) zoning district is intended as an area for Low Medium density single-family or multi-family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with the nearby single-family neighborhoods. The project site is being subdivided for the development of single-family residences at a density of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre and will become an integral part of the surrounding area. SECTION 4: The Victoria Community Plan Zoning Map is hereby by amended as shown in Attachment A of this Ordinance. SECTION 5: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the P591 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 877 VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00561 CALDWELL LAND SERVICES JUNE 3, 2015 Page 3 project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. • SECTION 6: Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,the City Council adopts Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2014-00561 as identified in this Ordinance and shown in Attachment A of this Ordinance. SECTION 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 8: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance. j ii.:' I 1 #1,1 L______j .( cI4 o77YZ 92 1 iC , Q��� 11 JI I , � j -� t iK 4 tO� c,,,,,.___, ON/bVIY Iti —- A .. S m . J 4. 3'JOlaM!!S J I D iki �. .I Mkt ab`. ,� II o f N. v or;NZh !. � v�� y Ai 1I o lczr- a ��F1f5S3tV 33H3a07d ON/�olbOd GaRJNA�Lti 2 11 0. L j____., _, rel •N i _�a 0 o r O r b�itztorr � S4 , E J oMd1aev�_' _SZ .-61T,ciA:/) a t. b". L 0 (---t"tt.41*fro itOCIN_off___Thr a Cri� ��7 ps-SMki t l�~^--— �'1 ICJ vapnon� . hqd Q- h R G h 7' U pS h •� v �w�3NOlSa3W011nSY� \''----( OlYb37Vd�� U t!!tO1NVlY h7 —N3.wnwW r I[ rJ ao3avde r—lovavo 3aoWfl7V8 �� OaN3nvo �� I v o liP .L d4,lNOit S3M 3' -- 1 S3_�I7 b 0 C-----)(%DV-34:7-4\�� 1 O r `O o (ti S `)? �. Gown ju. U I H LL::,.,,,.-., ----- '0.6' � � � J 0,9,;\---cv________, ohnb i.f 3q z/ N d y{j BR1 A 8000M CL ----.„..,,,,,„, . ,\ soic.801 )) 0 IV I l'-',-, %.,,,,,, ' cc-low/AN Oi ) IL No ,� J /" �, j , l bA441 Att achment A �! k7 R LI/r---i f '''.=t92,,, Ir o es ii E tarill, iii n .0 3 O 111 5 3 c) 3 a o _ c ,, ✓ -T 0 L0 0) O Q < _ X 3 It 6■10 fD v � m= 1 CD CD n a a . 0 _ y IV c o, cc a C = � ', 3 -' n. cD V7 a 3 .-1. chi p n ), a //� c o m V/ A O i r O Ii O i 3 N ' O -u 8. 9 M. * r c 41 1 *- '' i i P'1,ii 40.4 Air. , :7'. , if te lk. -. .___ 4 ;:X54 w 1�11i` wk; rp•• 4 ! r .i 4 t, r; , TvW. j k' . r' 40, / trite t d Dtt21+ • ' r 1 i' « `,• r ,- l V rteM _� .. J x " it 9t �+Vd a „�' - , ,. •r 'r. 121,...6,,012, 1" T T ,x -. .I Imo• . cp .lik,Matir FS,' . : A, , , . . , *, . . . , , i .�.• sI •O. .., 1 I si Ilk* ,,t4., 6 :, - ,z . 4fr k°).9,2,. . fia, , t:-• 1,, , .1.1)-1'. cr "' 1 .� aj- .... i • . j J, A. , a f. ° Florence P: + eurssayy �� r t fitt, y 2 C1 t' 1 ' F }^ S r yak�}}• I _ r jtA._')te� .I j �i �E 0,61 4 a _ ill - ,I . .• ••!i r.... .e.. _�Ls. 'i 1 JJ • - �N/V�� M _tea^RBR l rj� r \ I ] C •�� �: /l ( \5J vaa31++os� m If—' (_�� < Pr-n------ :—)c---.--,1 �� 'ohs t ! �Oagl — IEMON—f M b fl I Y ' CI° I )I � t CO 1 • ",_ CL' �� i ^ r�4 11 O T. 2j ,, 7, ,`� t ~�L��€ 3,� ar 4 s vc--:_... %jr,.. ..:.----- --- :_-1.--------7 4-- t(1 .5.. 11��\� GA(yES Tp q `LYONT�� \ c%�AOEOEO J( ' {' PAi£RYO ( 51/YMER Sr°NE_� 1_Z.i , �O `w l� 8, a AAOO y-� `� OC 1� PUMA H ��I �,. ��;r.� 3 ,.4' . 62 if iAIRWU'+DS /' MpR1A } A \��`���Vvv It( O: -AaeauR �� ■�c44J s �A� a- = b GALA rc 0 1 y11 y r 1 �1N ��!! C:o.:j( rOLORO J ` 3 T r� V� er _U n I 2 \C\ am n, , 1071± AN Fl ved s..... ) #i.P:S\,...:,% C r-IL j N 4 -O gl C� ti —P n C0 _, J o _ t� Yr�` �I .tirECMI SUNRIOOE s� _ . l\ 1_-• t_(ow _,( 1 LL, __ ______1 E,..-__.Pfaou b \ __. ��"ROCNES rER ( _ Z ` co EOIMYURdH k ,-I( r b m iR Li O T J Is a i rr l+ in1R�4Ua o &� I g j \ i Q. .� 2 çi1 \�� Y r� �vw�vai S N ` j j ��,� J�gy�A t 0 11 l i i 15 —vaa; 0 ..)) 1 rivi s (OS0 Li(((���� dOd, LEMON: N,Lifi.1rom r- }(--- t 4Eur-\;,...,--1-----c, I 2, rill r 1 , < .-- 0,4 Y ,. Z v r 11�yB'1) S�# •„,__, L'Lly RUNG\ 13 3 ,,,,J. \c:-..,D--:"-H, kr„, 0 0 , 0 .,....v-- . f ~i. \\ swivel CY r- > � tow 'It ! 'O' 3 � GACYESTi Q: wfsTApnr A`,yyU�[ T _ L \\\8J 4 Ui (BCAUOCOj �./ S Mt tt�1r -,T aCO � WNTOVAI v �� xL}I+If � O ”" g cp sJ : ryoiR;J,Nns l �■ tiL___ ] ��"��11JJ • N:A w� A. b lti It imp DD„,,g ;'. /1"-<"'" * 4 k �AIBRfANO �� 0 �ti� � � 8 \ n A-- ces' need ' try g •0 a' t ' I! jn ��� ° bi Q a 4 . It z N.• Z.,-/...7 \, _ le.f,,,. ,I! ....0".L. j 3 .,-„,-. .._,_________..;;N . ,...,, oc---,7., C-7 r- ? r___\67 K a,________-- c- -7,...„...._, , ....,, . 4 — c1.707004:‘, \ .O�re \\......-*-- rli rrOfffid fl , J ( cj _ao `FAVARA ■ -1?-------____J s-ft-J i E c; to t ii° ,., m :al ■-=-----przio0PCI'(11-1 Cr-Q-7 ' � --c—�ROpfESIER- = -T------ f �' rC' F i ? : 4 - , , ; ;P II!)9 .t.:„ ..., till; B '�r r ®i i f\ �y0 ti L I iii1 ,:■1 r__.7,,, .- _Igt__IA:7REET-.....j.— ....Th- -, .\ -lit @ N ,I [""— --1) / ' �,f ,...Z_ 6____. ,f - 1 )i , z' - iI,-( \ : . fik -- ' _ ' i rot ---6---77-'7:4-:.1.. ! , ii-i 0 — tv .,.. I it I f . z.... ,'''''V.:.?-71.: I ,' 1:$ .. i ,,....„71.7 Ji," , @ .„ Is ,,5, Oi .. _______ nil . .044?Li.. .:-'---------- '6-11:- 'IY::.:;/°1- Clif)= 7,.._ @ . ' I' 10'' - ---gl-Tr: '' -6@ )111 1 1 11. gl -I A; ' .r P. ' r."),U / - - / i ! 11), V ilk\ \ \\.. /..-,:-.410141 *140,.._ 0 r I 1 (Mt.__ „„st . — @ .....-4.2,-,,x : i',;' . N �I - . 1,42.4t , , __ . . ..-„i7,„,...;.,,, /., . ,.„-.0?fr \\#4, •----- - --.1 . . . --.:"..1D•i'lm - ...ilk. .'10 4 . ,, _ __i /, -rt, wok aoacn till ! co o ' 3c � � a o ,� v 3 Na -0 N ccni a) °on r �D 0 ' = Dcn13 * 3o ,e 0 °o_ - “ c - m ... - n N 'F0 re ” 0 na �+ - 74 C re Dm 0� 3 e CD SD 0 ' ' 0 * "D , < SD a Sp N E 3 a 0 N C � n y 7 1 3' a = a' n o co t 13 Q C� ... C O . _= p., E ND o _ = cD _ 1 _ aD n N (Q 3 sp N / a 3 rD =1 w a • P593 STAFF REPORT `' ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPAnIENT LINO RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 • CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager Subject: PUBLIC HEARING FOR PLACEMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS FOR DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution confirming the report of Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. delinquent refuse accounts and authorizing the placement of special assessments and liens against the respective parcels of land to be collected for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary County ad valorem property taxes. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 8.17.280 and Section 8.19.280 were added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code by the City Council when Ordinance No. 838 was adopted on April 6, 2011. These sections established the requirements for mandatory payment for residential, commercial, and industrial refuse collection service. As a result, the municipal code now requires all occupied properties in the City to have weekly refuse collection service provided by the existing franchise hauler or comply with the terms of the self-haul permit program administered by City staff. The mandatory refuse payment and service requirement was established to address illegal dumping and the stockpiling of refuse on properties. Municipal Code Section 8.17.280 and Section 8.19.280 also allow fees that are delinquent for more • than 60 days to become special assessments against the respective parcels of land, resulting in liens on the property for the amount of the delinquent fees, plus administrative charges. The City's franchise waste hauler Burrtec Waste Industries (Burrtec) administers the billing for commercial, industrial, and residential refuse collection service. Burrtec mails past due notifications requesting payment of the delinquent amount to affected property owners and occupants when an account is 60 days or more past due. Annually, Burrtec submits a list of delinquent accounts to the City for public hearing notification. Prior to mailing the Public Hearing notices, City staff review the list and property owner addresses to correct any discrepancies that might prevent a property owner from receiving the Public Hearing Notice. The address that is used for the notification is the address on file with the County Tax Assessor at the time of review. The Public Hearing Notice is then mailed to the property owner by Certified Mail no less than 10 days prior to the Public Hearing date. Burrtec provided the City with a list of delinquent refuse accounts on April 16, 2015. A Notice of Public Hearing was mailed on May 7, 2015, by Certified Mail to 1,063 property owners with delinquent refuse accounts. In addition, a Notice of Public Hearing advertisement was placed in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on May 12, 2015. • P594 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Public Hearing — Delinquent Refuse Accounts June 3, 2015 Page 2 The list of delinquent accounts included as Exhibit A was updated and provided to the City by Burrtec on May 19, 2015. As of May 19, 2015, there were 684 delinquent accounts for a total of$230,296.54 remaining on the list. Property owners that made a payment to Burrtec after May 19, 2015, will be removed from the list prior to submittal to the County. Property owners that are still on the delinquency list have until July 20, 2015, to submit payment to Burrtec. The final list of delinquent accounts will then be submitted to the County for the 2015-16 tax roll. • As of May 27, 2015, City staff responded to over 40 inquiries from property owners and the City Clerk received three written protests. In 2014, the City submitted a total of 129 properties with delinquent refuse accounts totaling $32,194.59 to the County for the 2014-15 tax roll. The report and payment from the County is expected at the end of June 2015. Staff reviewed the County Tax Collector payment records for each of the assessed properties to determine that 95% of the properties paid the delinquent amount in full. FISCAL IMPACT The City will receive some revenue through the franchise fee when the delinquent accounts are paid through the County of San Bernardino property tax collection process. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/LC:Is • • EXHIBIT A P595 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 0201 24401 00001KARINA ROJAS 15708 WINCHESTER CT 1 $212.60 0201 25135 000OTOSEPH A DANIERI 6275 ARCHIBALD AVE -I _$• 493.37 MARK-- - -- - - - 0201321230000!MARKNICOLETTE !6215 15 CA CARTILLA AVE _$182.48 0201 362 04 00 0 01DOROTHEAE ARNOLD L6230FILKINSAVE $452.54 __- __-- -164 ALEATICO PL ' $609.98 0201 394 25 0000 RYAN MC CRACKEN 40 _ _- 020 139 4370000LUCIANAFRATRUST 16493ALEATICOPL $284.80 0201 405 03 0000) THOMAS C GREEN SR 19836 BANYAN ST 1 _ $112.96 0201 40524 0000!HENRY J MONTOYA, JR 19780 LIBERTY ST _ r $• 197.28 0201 41302 0000 iJACQUELINESLAUGHTER-COLLIER 18250 GARDEN CT f $459.84 0201 47448 00001 JEFFREY J GWAY 16641 SUGARPINE PL ; _ $355.55 0201 474 58 00001 DEBORAH A QUESADA T9347 SILVERLEAF WAY I _ $126.53 0201 554 13 00001ANDY MENG C_HOU 1_- 0340 MAHOGANY CT I $371.08 0201 56321 00001KENYON M KING LIVING TRUST 10308 SOUTHRIDGE DR L 1 $177.88 -'MAMA MAMA 0201 573 55 0000!JORGE ZALDIVAR ___ 10162 THORPE CT $459.84 -*AL 0201 583 38 0000 iALLANP BAYER _110297 NORTHRIDGE DRi __$10976 0201 584 64 000(1E KELLY MILLER 110150 KERNWOOD CT 1 $366.91 0201 594 12 0000CLAUDIA GARCIA ____ 16124 CALLAWAY PL _ 1 _$321.72 0201 5944000_0) ERIC_SITY_UU REVOCABLE_LIVT_R____ 6140_CALLAWAYPL -L $174.80 0201623 44 0000 CHING-CHIEN CHEN _!6289 CHANDON PL _ 1_ $109.76 1 ______ _ '110829 PORT ST I $256.08 0201 623 50 0000(KEVIN BRADY -----t- --- - 0201 632 69 0000(JOSE CARRETO 16311 11 SEMILLON PL $153.52 0201 632 83000_0 STEVE GASSNER 16349 WINE CT i $329.88 0201 663 10 0000;JONES REGENERATION CENTER INC 111104 STONE RIVER DR in $459.84 0201 672 13 0000IMADHU KALRA T11047 GETTYSBURG DR -__ __$607.89 0201 691 18 0000 KAREN E EBERHARDT 6 �214 GRANBY AVE $372.32 --- ------ �------- -�A�A 0201 691 69 00_00 1DEREK X SAENZ 19920 LEMON AVE $284.80 �-MAMA-- ---------- -- 0201 701 36000_0(ALLAN G MALTES !x 1-0009 BANYAN ST $1,012.77 MAMA-- ---MAMA-I ---- 020173121 00001STEVEN C CARRILLO 16345 KINLOCK AVE H $217.76 _MAMA- ------ 0201 731 31 0000 HILLSIDE TRUST UDT 7-13-99 6367 MALVERN ST 1 $245.41 0201 761 07 0000IRUBEN CHAVEZ 6195 FILKINS AVE j_ $725.61 0201 771 24 0000 KENNETH R TAYLOR 110533 KINGSTON ST • _ L $241_04 - - MAMA-- -___i_--CALL__ - - - L--- - 0201 771 46 0000IYU&CHIU FAMILY TRUST 16266 CALLAWAY PL 1 $132.37 0201 782 04 00001RITCHIE M LEWIS _ -T11154 ANTIETAM DR E $197.28_ 0201 801 17 00001 FRANCES W JOHNSON -18338 GARDEN ST -t- 1 _ 1 $284.80 0201 811 04 000_1JEANINE MC LELAND 18511 HAWTHORNE ST L-$109.76 0201 811 54 ODOOIDONNA M COLON 16615 JASPER ST $366.00 ---MAMA- --------MAMA- ----1-MAMA ----- 0201 821 080001 0 EDDIE A MEDRANO, SR 16168 REVERE AVE $788.04 MAMA- - - - - - - --- 0201 89 t060000'REFUGIOORTIZ � ,6531 PERIDOT $143.31 0201 901 27 0000 BRADFORD L M_CCOLL 110027BRISTOL DR $212.32 -+MMA 0201 90131 0000-1LIZA QUI A NTERO _ 10075 BRISTOL DR ! $• 122.32 0201 922 06 0000 1MARIA SANCHEZ 16351 SILVERWOOD PL r $678.64 0201 922 16 0000 1 LAURA E MUNGUIA 111249 SUMMERSIDE DR• 1 $210.56 020193213 00002BESSIE A A RIVERAL -111269 OAK BROOK CT __$428.56 0201 942 13 0000 1 REBHYA Y ABDELJAW_A_D _ 1- 1259 CRESTRIDGE CT _$153.52 0202 021 45 0202041 24 XIONG QIAN --- -16929 BERYL ST t_ $602.00 0202 061 330055G EORGEFERRARO 119375 19TH ST I $109.70 0202 072 47 0000;GRACE M MIRANDA 19396 LA GRANDE ST 1 $870.86 -MAMA-- ----------- 0202 082 35 0000 1 JOHNSON CHEN 19323 25 LOMITA DR 1 $499.95 0202 091 18 00004PEDRO A CHAVEZ 17285 HELLMAN AVE x___$328.56 0202 102 28 0000'VANESSA M JACKSON ____ 16610 NANTUCKET PL $667.70 0202 102 38 0000!TAN LIVING TRUST 16662 BRIGHTON PL - - ___$142_58 020210247 0000GINAMMACIAS ;6604 BRIGHTON PL - $253.44 0202 111 42 0000 CARLEE R IVERSON r6733 JADEITE AVE 1 __$482.35 0202 111 60 0000 NICKOLAS S DESEVRENJACQUET 6713 KLUSMAN AVE _ $109.76 0202 131 39 0000 1BELIA MIRANDA 19633 MONTE VISTA ST 1 $295.52 • . Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT A P596 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 0202 251 29 0000 1JOSEPH R CORNELIUSSEN 18450 MONTE VISTA ST 1 $1,012.77 0202 271 17 0000 NGOZI NWOBU 18552 LA VINE ST $107.96 I--- __ _ _ _-_r-- $175.40 0202 272 03 0000�RONALD W HUBENER REVOCABLE TR 18672 LA GRANDE ST 0202 282 04 000 ONICA LARA __ ___'7041 JASPER ST __ E.__ $214_84 0202 291 10 00001JAMES SHAFER 19052 LA GRANDE ST I $261.32 0202 293 04 0000II11 BORROWER L P _17107 AGATE ST 1 . 0202 293 15 0000 1HEMAN CHUANG 17130 GARNET ST $134.80 0202 311 08 0000 i RAFAEL A DE LEON ;8_714 LA VINE ST 1 $788.04 0202322180000IJOHN C HARVEY !9152 CIELITO ST x___$416.08 0202 33126 0000 ISHEYLA SALDANA 18691 MIGNONETTE ST _$660.91 0202 33204 000_ 1- - � JOHN L ZAKRZESKI 1I8660 MIGNONETTE ST $463.00 --------- - ----------------- 0202 351 21 0000 JUSTIN CASTILLO 6844 EMERALD ST _ $634.88 0202 351 31 0000RIGOBERTO AGUILAR 6 RA867 CARNELIAN ST L_ $678.64 0202365 01 00001 ERNEST P MADRID 7217 SONOMA AVE L $105.09 0202 372100000 FERNANDO R ORTEGA 18668 LA PAIX ST ; $153.96 0202 413 02 0000 1TIBOR JUHASZ 16879 CAMEO ST .1 $459.84 0202 461 38 0000 1 HILLSIDE TRUST UDT 7-13-99 18998 HAMILTON ST 1 $186.34 0202 541 47 0000 1JANE KENNEDY 8892 GALA AV P/0 $459.84 0202 571 27 0000 i ROGER W HOWARD ___ __ __ _ 16956 AMETHYST AVE ! $153.52 0202 751_85 0000 iSEAN HATCH 18955 LA VERNE DR LI_$449.37 0202 831 42 0000 1GREGORY DORMAN 9037 CIELITO ST $147.36 ---- 1-------- 0207 044 29 0000 1 K-AIVAN MASHKOTIAZAD 17563 ALTA CUESTA DR L $145.52 0207 05102 00001YEISI K PINO_C_H_E_T _ 17608 BUENA VISTA DR 1 $184.80 0207 053 26 0000 11 LESMA YORKE 17707 BUENA VISTA DR L $354.83 0207 111 14 0000 iMARK FRIZZELL j8159 GROVE AVE 1_ $91.12 0207 111 16 0000 KAMEL HADDAD 18143 GROVE AVE 1 $98.91 0207 112 16 0006jERIN M ASCAR 18225 RED HILL COUNTR DR r $184.80 0207 123 31 00_0_0 1JOSE C RAMIREZ 8254 TAPIA VIA T $138.20 0207 123 H 41 0000 LANIETA ICKS 8268 RED HILL COUNTR DR ' $680.19 0207 132 24 0000 SYLVIA M OLMOS 8519 SANDALWOOD CT 1 $202.39 0207 141 17 00001JACK LAWRENCE _ 8215 TAPIA VIA $129.65 020714138 0000WEI GONG !8345 GROVE AVE 1 _ $210.97 0207161 11 0000 1JUAN LOPEZ _ 18178 AVENIDA VEJAR E $238.14 0207 00[ 161 15 00CHRISTOPHER J NORIEGA _ x8140 AVENIDA VEJAR r- $179.32 0207 161 30 00001'PAULA M VICENTE 18251 VIA CARRILLO r $105.44 02 _---- -- -F8216 PLACIDA CT $221.04 0207 161 37 0000 SHARON J SMITH -__ -___1- 0207 171 37 0000 CECILIA CARRILLO 18210 ARROW RT $241.77 0207 181 06 0000,IVANA Y MONCLOVA 8389 SIERRA MADRE AVE 1 $108.28 0207 182 15 0000SUMAN C SAGAR 8469 EDWIN ST p $744.32 0207 232 05 000(11-WINH NGUYEN 8214 SALINA ST _$191.96 0207 23404 0000;MWB#3 LLC _ _!8_645 SIERRA MADRE AVE 1__$372.32 0207 235 17 00001 DALIAA CORTES • r8251 SALINA ST 1 $109.76 0207 243 0 01 000 1WEI GONG 18795 VINMAR AVE f 1 $158.77 0207 243 11 00000LUISACERDA 18253 9TH ST 1- $503.60 0207 262 39 0000 SAUNDRA CRISS 8653 ARROW RT _ i _ $598.32 0207_343 03 0000;MARIA LIBIA BONILLA 18577 SIERRA MADRE AVE $369.32 0207351 04 00001LARRY A M_ICKE_L_SON_______________ ,8420 VIA LADERA _ $315.52 0207 351 15 0000 1 DONNA MAY GOOD -17376 VIA SERENA 1 $284.80 0207 352 04 0000 1SERGIO IBARRA 17419 VIA PARAISO 1 ' $16028 0207 352 110000!VIA AIROSA TRUST 8410 VIA AIROSA I $153.52 0207 353 26 0000MARION M OATES LIVING TRUST 17420 VIA PARAISO 1_ $505.80 0207 421 01 0000!PLUMA FAMILY TRUST 1, 890 CHURCH ST I $149.80 0207 421 08 0000 ii COTT STONEKING 18820 CHURCH ST ; $204.80 0207 422 05 0000CHRISTOPHER J SPEK 17751 SAN DIEGO AVE I $342.14 $342.14 0207 451 09 0000;JAMES K WALKER 18431 SALINA ST $184.80 0207 452 17 0000 ROSA DELGADILLO 18556 JASPER ST 1 $459.84 Page 2 of 13 EXHIBIT A P597 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS . Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 0207 453 10 0000 GARY GOMEZ 8573 EDWIN ST J $147.28 0207 531 47 0000[ROBERT F VASQUEZ 18475 BOWEN ST $547.36 0207 531 61 0000 MEHUL S MAJMUDAR 18781 COMET ST _ $788.04 0207 541 11 0000 JUAN RUIZ 18367 MAIN ST $1,273.00 0207 541 36 0000 LUIS L MARCOS 8410 MAIN ST __ _ _ _ _ $69_4.18 0207 541 40 0000 DAVID W ARKLE - 18376 MAIN ST $122.24 0207 541 47 0000 AROON& BHARATI DOSHI FAMILY TR 18357 CHAFFEE ST $148.41 0207 561 08 0000 RAYMOND LOPEZ 8768 ANADA CT I $280.52 0207 581 32 0000ICHRISTOPHER CROWDER 18348 EDWIN ST 1 $352.90 0207 591 45 0000 RRANCHO CONDOS LLC 18471 MORENO DR U-9 $174.92 0207 591 61 0000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 18483 CARSON PL U-25 $459.84 0207 591 70 0000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8440 CARSON PL U-34 $197.28 0207 591 72 0000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8430 CARSON PL U-36 $214.05 0207 591 75 0000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8440 SCENIC DR U-39 $132.51 0207 622 05 0000 RAFAEL DELOERA 18531 SALINA ST $197.28 0207 622 18 0000 IR EDUARDO SARACHO TR _ 18546 SAN JACINTO CT_ $95.32 0207 622 29 0000 IEVA UGAS 18573 SAN JACINTO CT I $329.88 0207 623 01 000JKATHLEEN M HORNBACK X8559 SALINA ST [ $9175 0207 623 280000 MOORE FAMILY TRUST _ 18554BALDY VISTA DR $96.75 0207 631 18 0000 EMAD NABIH 18715 PREDERA CT $299.84 0207 671 11 0000 YA XU LIVING TRUST 18430 CARSON PL#37 $109.52 0207 691 08 0000 SOMASUNDARARAO VASAMSETTY _ 18380 HIGHRIDGE PL $322.85 0207 701 12 0000 GIANFRANCO CAMPANELLA 8728 SIERRA VIEW CT -__$214.05 0207_70_1_18 0000[COOPER LIVING_TRUST 5/11/89_ _18719 SIERRA VIEW CT _[_-_$120.70 0207 711 22 00001DINESH SHARDA' 7563 ANTIGUA PL_---_-___-$459_84 ------------ 0208 082 25 0000 SEAN M SULLIVAN 7435 SPINEL AVE $122.14 0208 124 05 0000 PAUL E BUNCH jY850 KLUSMAN AVE $207.32 0208 124 12 0000 RICHARD B WESTBY 17831 LEUCITE AVE ' $170.29 0208 132 20 0000 HUEISHIN INC 19550 SAN BERNARDINO RD $140.28 0208 143 07 0000 SONJA P SWEENEY _-_ 19445 JACK RABBIT DR#107 $372.32 0208 151 33 0000 KENNETH W JACKSON 8055 PUEBLO PL#104 $278.60 0208 261 55 0000 PERRY FAMILY TRUST 9455 FOOTHILL BL $510.14 0208 281 16 0000IARTHUR AYALA _ 18197 ARCHIBALD AVE _I $744.28 0208 282 20 0000 LIONEL ARRIAGADA _ 19738 HAMPSHIRE ST _$295.52 0208 291 13 0000 STEPHEN M ROSS 19763 PLACER ST $459.84 0208 291 34 0000 FRANCISCO VILLALVAZO 19745 CERISE ST __$303.60 0208 311 54 0000 AYAD JABER 1-9802 PLACER ST _ _ $765.43 0208 311 64 0000 WILLIAM TU _ _19853 CERISE ST ___$109.76 0208 341 17 0000 RREEF AMERICA REIT II CORP TTTT 110300 ARROW RT $2,422.97 0208 361 07 0000[KARL K ABRIL 19218 CALLE VEJAR J $421.19 0208 363 31 0000IMANUEL M RODRIGUEZ 19180 ARROW RT $1,206.18 0208 363 34 0000 SFR 2012-1 U S WEST LLC 19152 ARROW RT $180.51 02083920300001 ROMAN SILVA MEDINA 17921 SELMA AVE $284.80 0208 394 08 0000 JOYCE A LAPALE 17966 MONTARA AVE $137.76 0208 421 09 0000 MARIA E LOLA 19385 PALO ALTO ST $284.80 0208 421 13 0000 MARIA FLOUTSIS 9425 PALO ALTO ST $109.76 0208 432 09 0000 ANTHONY ESTRADA 17375 LAYTON ST $263.49 0208 433 14 0000 CEDRIC A MOORE 19391 PEPPER ST $280.56 0208 454 03 0000 CATHERINE M KEAN _ 19105 CANDLEWOOD ST $119.00 . 0208 462 01 0000JJANAE LEWIS 17925 LION ST [ $197.28 0208 471 10 0000 1 CHARLES N LITTLEWOOD TR 17569 KLUSMAN AVE $722.40 0208 476 13 0000 TOMMY R GARCIA 7590 MALACHITE AVE $109.76 ----0208 491 020000 DORR FAMILY TRUST 9323 CHURCH ST $416.08 0208 501 03 0000 JAMES& DEBORAH THOMPSON FAM TR 17726 BERYL ST $145.37 0208 503 200000 FRANK SUTLEY __ 17729 SPINEL AV $467.66 0208 506 04 0000 WILLIAM LEONI LIVING TR 19165 HEMLOCK ST $181.23 Page 3 of 13 EXHIBIT A P598 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 0208 511 09 0000 HILL FAMILY TRUST AGREEMENT _ 7725 MONTARA AVE 1 481.72 0208 523 06 0000 ELTONMISHIKAWA 7935 AMETHYST AVE 1 $467.66 0208 524 09 0000 MANUELA N REYES 9430 SAN BERNARDINO RD r $296.24 0208 533 05 0000[KAREN C FOOTE 7830 AMETHYST AVE I $582.42 ----- -------------- ------------- ----------- 0208 533 09 0000 BLANCA RAMIREZ 7835 LAYTON ST $503.60 020854205 00001RACHEL RODRIQUEZ 9550 PALO ALTO ST $295.52 0208 563090000,DEBORAH MARTINEZ 5555 5555 7595 AMETHYST AVE $201.48 0208 572 11 0000TDENNIS WILLIAMS 5555__ -17681 KLUSMAN AVE $493.58 0208 573 26 0000�,DANIEL S MARQUEZ 19504 CHURCH ST $219.16 0208 593 18 0000 j LYNETTE CHALCRAFT BELAND 17398 BERYL ST $328.56 0208 651 07 0000 1ELVIAGUTIERREZ 7924 KIRKWOOD CT $788.04 0208 692 13 0000 GOOD TIMING PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC 9289 BIRCH ST $180.76 0208 703 15 0000[JOAN BYRD 7795 MALACHITE AVE $582.42 0208 713 11 0000 LISA MC NULTY 7578 LION ST _ $124.80 0208 743 10 0000 I ED A MURADLIYAN 5555___ 8991 HEMLOCK ST $116.96 0208 751 01 0000IED A MURADLIYAN _ 8940 REEVES CT _ _$120.70 0208 752 26 00001KHALED FAYTROUNI 7953 SUMMERLIN PL $180.05 0208 761 04 0000;RICHARD A REBELLO _ _ 8259 AMETHYST AVE i $1_08.52 0208 761 25 0000IBRIDGETT L DAVIS 8216 LAYTON ST I $421.46 0208 761 87 00001JEREMY LANINI 8278 KIRKWOOD CT $380.83 0208 77221 000012013-1 IH BORROWER _ 5555__ ___9309 PLACER ST $108.56 0208 772 63 0000 1 DUONG NGO TRONG 9441 DEVON ST $394.20 0208 772 82 0000'WATKINS FAMILY TRUST _ 9481 PLACER ST 5555__ $152.79 0208 772 92 0000IJASON D WACHTER L445 KONOCTI ST r_ $147.08 0208 811 32 0000 CHARLES COLEMAN 18454 KLUSMAN AVE _ L $238.14 0208 851 20 0000(PETER T WILLETTE 18202 KINLOCK AVE I $503.60 0208 901 64 0000 ELIZABETH MORENTIN 8273 AVENIDA LEON $91.44 0208 921 09 0000[DONAVAN R VREM_REVOCABLE LIV TR I 7444 AVILA AVE _ $216.08 0208 931 26 0000,KEVIN HWU _ 9003 YEW ST _ _ $109.76 0208 991 02 0000 RAMONA BOWMAN 9310 TRYON ST $192.32 0209 032 02 0000 WOLHAUPTER, CHARLES K TRffBO-NICOLE) 8800 ONYX AV#C $167.49 0209 032 11 0000IWILKINSON FAMILY TRUST 9979 FERON BLVD#U $117.99 0209 063 12 0000[MONICA L REYES _ 19893 FERON BL I $251.98 0209 063 15 0000 10SCAR JIMENEZ _ 19882 MAIN ST $414.92 0209 071 13 0000 DAVID E MADRIGAL 8725 RAMONA AVE $599.70 0209 101 370000!GILBERT L PEREZ _ 10158 25TH ST $120.13 0209 104 07 0000 IALEJANDRO MORA 10257 25TH ST $316.92 0209 121 31 0000/DAVID ARSHAWSKY 10390 26TH ST 555.5 $996.22 0209 143 23 0000 ISMITS FAMILY TRUST 11241 JERSEY BLVD#102 I $802.90 0209 145 18 00001WHITE OAK LLC 8740 WHITE OAK AVE I $1,350.96 0209 171 13 0000 IGWENDOLYN V POTTER TR 19647 8TH ST I $142.36 0209 171 39 0000 IEVA PRIHISZTAL 2014 REVOCABLE TR 19353 8TH ST#F $280.06 0209 171 43 0003'INLAND CORPORATION 9592 7TH ST $462.14 0209 171 46 0000IINLAND CORPORATION 9024 ARCHIBALD AVE $1,141.38 0209 191 05 OOOO LOUIS& DARLA BIRCHEFF FAM TR 8943 ARCHIBALD AVE $102.92 0209 191 13 0000 GEORGE T ASSANELLI TR 8956 BELMONT AVE $219.16 0209 211 40 0000 ISETBISIUN LIGAT TRUST . 10096 6TH ST#O,P $392.69 0209 261 50 0000'BALLY COURT LLC 19237 BALLY CT $1,763.60 0209 281 05 0000 ICELESTINO LUIS 19841 SALINA ST $755.22 0209 285 05 0000IDANA L BLACKWELL 18631 RAMONA AVE $123.02 0209 292 01 0000'GUADALUPE V MORALES 19396 MEADOW ST $329.88 0209 292 07 0000 LUIS VALENTIN _9237 KIRKWOOD AVE $414.88 0209 295 01 0000 NAOMI GRIJALVA 9396 6TH ST _ $461.35 0209 295 26 0000 GAIL TYLER 9219 LAYTON ST $481.72 0209 295 27 0000!CHRISTINE M SALDIVAR 9211 LAYTON ST $109.76 0209 302 27 0000,BYRON LEWIS 110019 SALINA ST I $121.54 Page 4 of 13 EXHIBIT A P599 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 0209 303 10 0000'RENATO SANTIAGO 19978 ALPINE ST I $109.76 0209 303 18 0000 iTUONGVANNGUYEN 10070 SALINA ST 1 $1,012.77 0209 312 020000 DARIN PLUNKETT 8618 FERNWOOD DR 1 $697.17 0209 312 10 0000 ELSAPEREZ _ 8671 PINE DR __ $164.18 0209 312.61 0000 GILBERT BOWSER _9975 MCKINLEY ST $911.93 0209 321 32 0000 MARVIN L WRIGHT 19232 MALACHITE AVE $241.04 0209 321 33 0000 1 ROBERT BARAY 19242 MALACHITE AVE L $366.58 0209 341 30 0000CHU HAN CHIU 79370 DEERBROOK ST 1 _ $167.28 0209 341 4400_0012013-1 IH BORROWER LP 19131 LAYTON ST '1 $109.76 0209 361390 000['1 EDWARDEHERNANDEZ 19635 CAMERON ST L_ $459.84 0209 361 55 0000 PEDRO A RIVERA '9534 CAMERON ST 1 $109.76 0209 361 60 0000 JOSE JESUS QUINTEROS 19571 EDELWEISS ST 1 $109.76 0209 431 03 000001 KELLY J PARKER 110138 CONCORD DR $153.52 0209 431 10 00001TAN LIVING TRUST 110171 BEDFORD DR _ _ $153.52 -r- 0209 431 18 00000ESTUARDO MARROQUIN 10116 BEDFORD DR L $158.63 0209 431 25 00001 ALEXANDEROSIFESO 18618 ANDOVER PL $269.94 0209 442 45 0000 LOUDEN LLC 18667 SAN MIGUEL PL $197.28 0209 442 58 0000_130N GONZALEZ 654 SANMIGUEL PL -L $196.32 0209451 1600001ROBERT Q DE •E 19216 E RANCHO PARK CI i $1,202.00 0209 452 32 00OO IGERAL BOINER JR 19263 RANCHO PARK PL ! $98.82 0209 45233 0000 _RAY&SHARON HOMMES FAM TR 9277 RANCHO PARK PL I $459.84 0209 555 48 0000 1 PAUL ROACH ____ 1_0356_SPARKLING DR#1 r $109.76 0210 071 50 0000�THOMAS J COBB TR -_-__ _ 9805 6TH ST#103 _-_-_-L_ $360.76 0210 461 670000'JAMIE J WU • +9446 POPPYFIELD CT 1 $197.28 0210 481 37 0000 LUIS D ORIGEL 19517 CEDAR GLEN CT r $339.19 0210 481 64 00001H0 LIVING TRUST 7/11/08 19529 BROOK DR 1 $103.71 ----- -------- T-� 0210492100000-r LINFAMILY 2008 TRUST - 19481 STONEYBROCK PL I $10976 0210 512 43 0000 IRO UN HSIAO 9488 CEDAR GLEN CT r _$192.17 0210 641 05 0000 iWEN HAO CHEN 19536 HARVEST VISTA DR r _$262.92 0210 641 09 0000 1HUABING WEN 19564 HARVEST VISTA DR $324.91 0225_12281 00001 JULIA A GORMAN _ 13053 23RD ST _r $1,012.77 0225 211 50 0000 1 KRISTIN SCOTT 11315 MOUNT ABBOTT CT ! $197.28 0225 212 18 0000 1,JAMES E WARD 111387 MOUNT JOHNSON CT__-'1 $284.80 0225 231 55 0005 FAKHOURY FAMILY TRUST 11421 PYRAMID PEAK CT 'i, $45984 0225 231 56 0000!FONG LIVING TRUST 111413 PYRAMID PEAK CT1 $348.58 0225 241 23 0000'DAVID&MARY GLOVER FAMILY TRUST 111619 MOUNT RAINIER CT 1 $300.12 0225 241 33 0000!JOHN MICHAEL WALLER 111533 MOUNT RAINIER CT L $1_71.46 0225 251 03 0000 1SANTELLAN REVOCABLE LIV TR 16332 MOUNT WELLINGTO CT 1 $109.76 0225 252 34 0000IBRANDON M HEYES _ 16399 KETTLE PEAK PL 1 $109.76 0225 261 24 000ENNIFER LDOMINGUEZ 111593 SANTIAGO PEAK CT 1 0!J $184.80 022526149 00001JOSEABRAIRA T11542 MOUNT BALDWINCT _--j-_$248.56 0225 281 21 0000 1 RICHARD A ROSALES 16430 MOUNT RUSHMORE PL 1--T1-09.84- 022528122 0000 CANNIES CHAN 76422 MOUNT_RU_SHMORE PL 1 $223.54 0225 301 25 0000!ESTHER CASTILLO 111754 MOUNT WILSON CT 1 $339.42 0225 311 12 0000 HONG JIE PAN 111785 MOUNT STERLING CT -I_ $184.80 0225 312 22 0000 1VERONICA DIAZGRANADOS REV LIFETIME -x{-11825 MOUNT ROYAL CT 1 $459.84 0225 312 45 0000 YADOLLAH GAZANFARI 11_1879 MOUNT ROYAL CTI $109.76 0225 321 08 0000IDARRYL PHILLIPS _ __ _ 16429 CALICO PEAK PL _1 __$61111 0225 341 12 0000 1STACY C NUNEZ . 112724 ARENA DR r $591.12 • 0225341 25 0000�MYRLE L LARRAYA SURVIVOR TR 112820 E RANCHO ESTATES PL -L $238.14 0225 401 06 0000 1MELVIN WARE 6192ASHTON PL -1 $470.78 0225 41109 0000.ANTHONY V RUSSO 16338 SHOW HORSE WAY $495.24 0225 421 27 0000OSCAR A FAVELA 112438 HIGH HORSE DR $153.52 0225 421 37 0000 PECK S DAMIANI 16_278 STABLE FALLS AVE $235.93 0225 521 08 0000 ROGER CRAWFORD x12644 PARKE CI 1 _ $926.70 0225 541 01 0000 1 ROBERT L CARDOZA 16110 GREENWOOD PL I $269.52 Page 5 of 13 EXHIBIT A P6OO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA • BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name _ Property Address Amount 0225 611 04 0000 1ALBERTO ROMEROf12874 BRIDGE WATER DR $1,012.77 0225 621 48 0000(BENJAMIN MENESES 12239 KEENLAND DR $241.04 0225 642 09 0000 LFABIO TOVAR 15981 GREYVILLE PL $234.88 0225 653 10 0000 ZHANG-CHEN TRUST _L12355 SPLIT REIN DR $153.52 0225 661 23 0000 YON_ G J_G_ I_L _ . __ 1 12867 BAHAMA CT ___ $175.40 0225 701 100000 BO CUI f12170 BLUE SPRUCE DR $278.24 0225 711 01 0000IMEDIA MOUSSAVY 112195 CANYON MEADOWS DR $106.16 0225 711 20 0000 THULEMEYER, GREGORY ALAN -16227 CEDAR HILL PL $459.84 0225 721 52 0000 FIROZ ALI 112228 SPLIT REIN DR L $241.04 0225 741 27 0000;PING LI 16311 SANDHILL PL $788.04 0225742 10 0000(WEI YUEH-MEI AMY CHIU L6315 DRIFTWOOD PL $126.53 0225 751 25 0000IYUE NI _ 112347 ROCKWEED CT $109.28 _ 0225 831 15 0000`tJIAN HUI ZHU '12217 IRONSTONE DR j $109.76 0226 211 18 0000IKARENEVANS-COX 5365COVINAPL j $289.94 0226 231 68 0000(BRENDA BELL 5660 SAN MARINO WAY , $284.80 0226 241 47 0000 IYONGZHI LI _ 114078 ARCADIA WAY $454.73 0226 272 28 0000;CHAVEZ, BERNARD P JR 1 14108 SAN GABRIEL CT $697.18 0226 291 38 0000(RICHARD E RICE 114058 PEARSON CT $194.92 0226 432 24 0000 JOSEPH DE SILVA 113861 LAUREL TREE DR $1,087.46 0226 502 01 0000'CHENG HSIEN CHANG 13949 DOVE CANYON WAY $214.81 0226 502 48 0000 RIGOBERTO DE LA TORRE _ 6116 WEEPING WILLOW CT $241.04 0226 512 01 0000 FUHUA ZHU [13827 HUMMINGBIRD WAY $276.08 0226 53207 0000 RHEA R R ESPINOSA 13742 SANTA LUCIA CT $153.52 0226 631 36 0000-IMARCIAL LE_ANO JR_____ h920 SAN SEGUNDO DR $284.80 0226 661 15 0000- CHAKER I ELHAJJMOUSSA 15145 CONGEMI CT 0227 051 10 0000 ELLEN KWAN LEE 16655 ETIWANDA AVE $268.03 0227 061 66 0000 CHARLES E GIBBONS _ 112920 VICTORIA ST $620.29 0227 071 21 0001_RICHARD RINARD 37 EAST AVE -__ $3,185.96 0227 092 19 0000 i&QIMIN YANG 251 BROOKFIELD DR _ $236.95 0227 192 02 0000 MARIA TAGLE ;7070 RAINTREE PL __- $459.84 0227 192 16 0000 TYRONE R HORN _ 113473 WINDY GROVE DR $238.14 0227 256 04 0000;BRANDON P LINE 113091 VISTA ST ; $519.13 0227 259 10 0000;MARIA R TERRY 113050 PINON ST I $111.22 0227 382 14 0000 RONNIE DELGADO 13426 CAJON CREEK CT $328.43 0227 472 16 0000 MEI M SHIH 113087 NORCIA DR I $109.76 0227 504 02 0000 STUART SACKLEY 112932 CARNESI DR Ifr $835.09 0227 582 57 0000 GEORGE L BARREIRO 7161 EAST AVE#18 $626.96 0227 693 39 0000 COLERIDGE BERNARD STROUD 7122 ACORN PL $790.32 0227 802 21 0000 KELI LI 7181 SUNNYSIDE PL $694.68 0227 821 27 0000 RALPH C KIES 13390 WHITESTONE PL $607.08 0229 031 40 0000 1THM ENTERPRISE LLC _ 112469 FOOTHILL BL r $385.59 0229 031 41 0000'THM ENTERPRISE LLC 12489 FOOTHILL BL -L_ $739.67 0229 171 130000;MARIA T RUBIO 13217 ARROW RT $216.58 0229 192 170000 ANITA VASQUEZ 13221 WHITTRAM AVE 0229 271 49 0000 JAMES BOSTICK ;9008 HYSSOP DR $561.74 0229 302 03 0000 ARTHUR A AND CANDELARIA A BANUELOS 1 03 31 VINE ST $250.92 0229 302 11 0000IANTHONY MILIAN 113060 CHESTNUT AVE $109.76 • 0229 305 11 0000 1JUAN MARTINEZ ;8199 CORNWALL AVE 1 $533.22 0229 311 01 00001AMOS JOHN SLOVACEK 113004 CHESTNUT AVE F $124.64 0229 312 02 0000[NAMATALLA R SHENOUDA 18200 MORTON AVE $459.84 0229 313 16 0000[MILDRED ROBILLARD 18256 EMMETT AVE ( $892.21 0229 391 17 0000 ERIN CHOW KWON TRUST 112228 6TH ST $876.59 1061 051 06 0000 MARIA FLORES 8083 SURREY LN $139.59 1061 111 21 0000 JOSE ALONSO 5320 CAROL AVE $404.56 1061 121 20 0000 MATTHEW P GARDNER 18150 VINMAR CT _ $591.12 1061 141 24 0000 JULIE REYES ;8462 WHIRLAWAY ST $926.70 Page 6 of 13 EXHIBIT A P6O1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 1061 141 31 0000'KATHERINE BERGREEN 5392 VIA SERENA ( $1,021.68 -- 1061153 0000 71 2 iPAULINE R MANNING _ _ 8318 LA SENDA RD $934.08 1061 17210000 10 ROBERT HERNANDEZ _- _ 8348 ALMOND ST $123.10 1061 291 010000'ED SHAMUILIAN 5022 GATEWAY RD $109.76 - ----- - -------------- 1061 341 24 0000 JEFF STORY 8966 CITATION CT $678.64 1061 361 19 0000'ERIC ANDERSON _ 8960 CAMELLIA CT $459.84 1061 401 20 0000,LOIS SMITH 9463 SHERWOOD DR $164.36 • 1061 581 27 0000 NOE H ULLOA _ 5681 AMETHYST AVE r---$133.56 1061 671 12 0000 iD &J PROPERTIES INC 8540 ORCHARD ST I $308.64 1061 691 02 0000;ANDY J MARTINEZ 5657 SAPPHIRE ST I $274.78 1061 711 15 0000;JOHN T PLEVNEY 8135 ORCHARD ST $153.52 1061 721350000 GARY W GRAY 8225 BEECHWOOD DR $528.60 1061 781 10 000) JOSEPH RICHARD BARON 9244 CARRARI CT $720.30 1061 801 04 0000'BETTY JEAN BROWN LIVING TRUST 8947 LARAMIE DR _ $123.38 1061 801 13 0000IJOSUE FLORES 4974 LAREDO PL _ $567.68 1062 021 23 0000'O'HARA FAMILY TRUST AGREEMENT _8333 JENNET ST $284.80 1062 031 23 0000 1MERCY P MANALU 5794 TROTTERS LN r $123.38 1062 151 12 0000 ROBERT M ROMERO 8424 THOROUGHBRED ST 1 $1,260.01 1062 151 17 0000 iARLENESILVERA 8334 THOROUGHBRED ST• 1062 161 02 0000 11SAIAS SOLANO --_ 8287 THOROUGHBRED ST _ $472.37 1062 301 35 0000'LOUIS SPEARS 8558 BANYAN ST $153.52 ---------------- ---------- -- -------------- 1062 421 24 0000 ROBERT J BECKLEY 9381 APRICOT AVE $107.36 1062 501 41 0000 ALEXANDER KHATCHADOURIAN 6321 VIA SERENA $109.76 1062 501 60 00001J MICHAEL TOBIN 6348 CITRINE ST ___ $339.20 1062 511 06 0000 IABUJUDEH FAMILY REVOCABLE LIV TR 6333 NAPA AVE _ $446.71 1062 511 51 0000 1 WILLIAM C ZEMAITIS 6315 HOLLY OAK DR $462.42 1062 521 59 0000 HENRY R GAXIOLA 6311 EMERALD ST $601.00 1062 571 37 0000 HUFF FAMILY TRUST 9599 ALTA LOMA DR $109.76 1062 621 65 0000 LOLITA A SY 6488 HOLLY OAK DR $481.72 1062 641 11 0000 JOSEFINA EMERY 6431 AQUAMARINE AVE $153.52 1062641 28 0000 MARIA A RUIZ 6421 CAROL AVE $176.08 1074 041 02 0000 1FRANKIE R LIRA 4949 ALMOND CT 1 $847.56 1074 121 15 0000'ELAINE SANCHEZ 10438 HIDDEN FARM RD 1 $131.64 1074 131 28 0000 MOCHIZUKI FAMILY TRURST 5207 MAYBERRY AVE $109.76 1074 151 12 0000 jAZER REZK _ 9840 CINCH RING LN $109/6 1074211 01 0000[NANCY PASOS 10015 HILLSIDE RD $509.16 1074 221 06 0000IMEIZHEN XIE 5652 MORNING CANYON WAY $177.58 1074 421 05 0000 MANUELAULLOA N AV 10782 WILSON __$322.32 1074 431 23 000)IDARLA CLEVELAND . 5501 CANISTEL AVE $124.32 1074 481 19 0000 1ROBERT D CHAVEZ 10811 BOULDER CANYON RD r $328.56 1074 561 04 0000 IDENETTE AUSTIN 10923 CARRIAGE DR $613.98 1074 561 13 0000'LIVERY LEASING INC 11065 RANCH DR ' $284.80 1074 591 11 0000 1MPH INVESTMENTS LLC 4947 HUNTSWOOD PL $109.76 1074 621 300000 TRACI BOWENS 11090 HIDDEN TRAIL DR $678.64 1074 621 40 0000 f WEICHUNG HUANG 4935 BUCKSKIN CT $459.11 1076 032 25 0000 1JOSE G VALENCIA 9766 WILLOW WOOD DR $755.22 1076 032 28 0000;JOHN M BECHARD 6719 TREELINE PL $208.46 1076 032 53 0000ISANTOS, LYDIA T 19737 WILLOW WOOD DR $459.84 1076 032 67 00001JOYCE Y HILL-MARTINEZ 19728 WOODLEAF DR $983.18 1076 041 21 00001HILDA ARAIZA 16723 LONDON AVE $242.75 1076 042 37 0000!AVALON ST TRUST [9855 AVALON ST $459.84 1076 071 04 0000 BROUGHAM, GERALD R 6753 RAMONA AVE $109.76 1076 091 54 0000 FERDINAND Y BARCELONA 6671 MONTRESOR PL 1076 121 17 0000 GREG RAMOS 10295 19TH ST $266.04 1076 131 36 0000 THOMAS CANDIDO 10466 FINCH AVE $292.63 1076 151 29 00001ZHALEH REZVAN • 10435 GALA AVE $609.92 Page 7 of 13 EXHIBIT A P602 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 1076 161 48 000 i0 CHRIS A AGBOBU [6815 CARTILLA AVE 1 $130.19 1076 161 68 0000 1 DAVID E CLARY 10312 HOLLY ST 1 $180.51 1076 171 02 0000IPANAYIOTIS FIOURIS _ 6920 RAMONA AVE I $295.52 1076 172 14 0000'ALVIN R JOHNSON 6958 LAGUNA PL#A _I_ $163.00 1076 173 02 0000`MARGARET C RAMIREZ 9736 HUNTINGTON DR#C $153.52 1076 173 17000_0 YADIRA CHAVEZ 6936 DOHENY PL#A $387.23 ---------------- ---- ' 1076 181 16 0000 1MONICA L JENNINGS 9815 YALE DR _I _ $134.80 1076 221 40 0000[LUIS D GONZALEZ x7040 CAMBRIDGE AVE r $599.80 1076 221 41 0000 1 WILLIAM D BRYAN 10022 LA VINE ST $368.64 1076 221 67 0000 17013 RAMONA AVENUE TRUST 17013 RAMONA AVE 1 $197.28 1076 231 58 0000 DEBORAH A ROBERTSON [7125 TEAK WAY _ $109/6 1076 231 83 0000 MARK J LEWAN 9932 LOMITA DR $109.76 1076 251 05 0000 IRIS BORGES 10151 VICTORIA ST $153.52 1076 251 30 0000[GOLDEN YARROW SAN BERNARDINO LLC 10188 GOLDEN YARROW LN $497.08 1076 251 35 00001SOFIA T VARGAS 110140 GOLDEN YARROW LN i $241.04 1076 251 49 0000 1STASLA M JUAREZ 110217 GOLDEN YARROW LN i $123.61 1076 261 60 0000[RICHARD V DELACY _ 110161 MONTE VISTA ST $394.20 1076 291 33 0000 1MARILYN MILLER REVOC TRUST 10439 VICTORIA ST $120.70 1076 341 32 0000 10637 HEATHER LLC 10637 HEATHER ST I __$341.80 1076 351 47 0000 JJAVIER PARAMO 6709 MANGO ST $154.76 1076 351660000 DANIEL P GRAY 10641 GALA AVE $387.64 1076 391080000'DENNIS H SLINEY ___ 10955 SANTA BARBARA PL $208.22 1076 391 090000[GRACE A KRAMER 110965 SANTA BARBARA PL__-C__$186.34 1076 401 30 00001 TIMOTHY ADAMS 16633 SAN BENITO AVE L $459.84 1076 431 45 0000 1JORGE CARDONA '16974 DAKOTA AVE [ $228.76 1076 451 33 0000 JAMES WOOD 16930 MENDOCINO PL ! $109.76 1076 501 59 0000[JOYCE LONGO 6518 PALOMAR CT 1 $197.28 1076 511 13 0000 MIN YANG 11129 SHAW ST I $244.48 1076 511 17 0000 MARTHA RGONZALEZ _ _ _ _11114 SHAW ST __t�-_ _ __$280.02 1076 511 20 0000 ISHARLA L GEIST 11096 SHAW ST $109.84 1076 511 33 0000 KELLY C FLORES 11006 SHAW ST L $109.76 1076 511 49 0000 LONNIE J SHOEMAKER 11079 SHAW ST 1 $311.79 1076 512 29 0000[LAWRENCE A DANIELS_ 6584 PURDUE CT 1 $153.52 1076 512 57 0000 1 CYNTHIA J GOMEZ 6630 CAMROSE PL r $766.16 1076 521 16 00061[E, LISE K FRAZIER 6631 ALBERTA PL IL_ $228.56 107652203 0000'ROGER GEE 11103 CHARLESTON ST I $183.28 1076 522 12 0000[ALEX RIVERO _ _ 11045 CHARLESTON ST $788.04 1076 531 33 0000 1ROGER A LAWRENCE _ 10727 MORNINGSIDECT _ $414.88 1076 541 44 00001JUDY J WORRELL REV TR CAMROSE PL I __$503.60 1076 561 02 0000SUSAN K KUNIYOSHI TR 16981 NOVA CT r $416A6 1076 561 4500001 ROSA M MARTINEZ REVOCABLE TR -711273 DRAKE ST r $241.04 1076 581 13 0000[ZHENGHAO ZAI L7055 SHERBROOKE PL 1 $305.95 1076 601 01 00001M R&T H FORTUNATO FAMILY TRUST 05 7087 CAMPBELL PL 1 $120.70 1076 601 13 0000[OSCAR CEJA 7071 WOODBURY CT $459.84 1076 611 16 0000[KAREN CUNNINGHAM 10983 SANTA BARBARA PL $1,012.77 1076 611 21 00001JANICE SANTIAGO 10981 SANTA CLARA CT $416.08 1076 652 16 0000 1JAMES E BORDES 11228 WINGATE DR 1 $197.28 1077 011 14 0000 1GARRY A TURNER 7377 PASITO AVE 1 $481.72 1077 021 57 0000;MICHAEL HOSCH 7452 RAMONA AVE 1 $174.69 1077 021600000 1NESTOR SANDOVAL 7482 RAMONA AVE 1_ $115.27 1077 031 18 0000 W I LLMONT LLC _--_110081 PALO ALTO ST 1_ $316.37 1077 031 36 0000 ANDREW RAYMOND OCHOA 19957 PALO ALTO ST $150.08 1077 031 92 0000 ANTHONY ESTRADA 7475 RAMONA AVE _$477.12 1077 051 08 000KEITH N LANE 10195 PALO ALTO ST _r $124.64 1077 051 24 0000 MARY LOU MC MAHAN 10160 PALO ALTO ST E $722.0 1077 051 28 0000 1MICHAEL W FENTON 17451 MATTERHORN AVE 1 $241.04 Page 8 of 13 EXHIBIT A P6O3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. • DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 1077 061 16 0000IJEFFREY GWAY 10272 PEPPER ST 1 $491.12 1077 061 3300001 PAMELA E WILLIAMS 110298 ALDER CT _1 _$234.84 1077 061 50 0000 ALISON E CLOSE [10291 MAGNOLIA CT x__$295.52 1077 061 630000 BONNIE A POLIAKON 7359 CENTER AVE $169.57 1077 061 72 0000 ERIC ESTUARDO ALVAREZ _ 7513 CENTER_AVE $131.64 1077 071 16 0000 MICHAEL GEORGE HOGG 7409 IVY LN $197.28 1077 071 23 00001-PATRICIA JOHNSON 10339 PEPPER ST $459.84 1077 071 36 0000 1 PHILLIPS FAM 2005 TR 2-15-05 10384 IRONWOOD ST $186.34 1077 081 03 0000 1MAE ELDER 7328 MARINE AVE r $452.46 1077 081 33 0000[CAROL A MOFFAT 17411 MARINE AVE I $209.58 1077 122 10 0000 ROBERT C GARDEA 17323 CASCADE CT $445.58 1077 141 35 0000 1 KIMBERLY D BOLDUC 10617 SUNBURST DR $109.76 1077 141 50 0000 FREDRICK COOPER 7452 VILLA CREST PL $394.20 1077 141 83 0000 RAYMUNDO RAMIREZ 7501 SIERRA LINDA CT $231.72 107716241000_0 WILLIAM J VITTO 111010 FRANKLIN DR $258.30 1077 162 42 0000ifHARRY& BIBI SHEONARINE REV TR __ 111008FRANKLIN DR $483.38 1077 18143 0000 '1 KEVIN T LIPSCOMB • 17529 PLYMOUTH WAY $788.04 1077 251 53 0000[EFREM EFREM SARGENT _ 110450 BALSA ST $525.04 1077 281 25 0000 ALEXANDER R VALENZUELA 7568 LOCKHAVEN AVE $284.32 1077 281 70 0000 KENJI UMEMOTO 10278 CANDLEWOOD ST $197.28 1077 291 03 0000 STEVEN JAMES& MELINDA A HAYDEN REV TR 9921 CANDLEWOOD ST $210.28 1077 301 07 0000IKERRY MATHEWSON _ 7635 GRANBY AVE $109.76 1077 311 26 0000 1VICTORIA GONZALEZ 7527 LONDON AVE $619.89 1077 311 27 0000[MONIQUE A MCKENDALL 7521 LONDON AVE $132.30 1077 35139 0000 GREGORY S& CORINNE SUTTON REV TR 17828 DARTMOUTH AVE $120.70 1077 361 21 0000 RICHARD L SPEARS _ 17759 ELMHURST AVE $425.04 1077 371 05 0000 ROBERT FERRO TR 7750 CENTER AVE P $176.08 • 1077 371 15 0000 MICHAEL BLASINGAME 7710 PARAMOUNT CT $285.28 1077 371.41 0000 JAIME A CIFUENTES _ _ 7721 LOCKHAVEN CT $94.35 1077 381 18 0000 ARTHUR MARTINEZ FAMILY TRUST _ 10139 ASHFORD ST $193.68 1077381 46 000)0 DAVID J VIGNEAULT 10124 NORWICK ST $109.76 1077 391 12 0000 1 DAVID A LYMAN 10249 EFFEN ST I $482.42 1077 391 31 0000 1 LORENE BOND 110126 DORSET ST r $223.04 1077 391 38 0000 JORGE JIMENEZ 10177 DORSET ST I $372.32 1077 391 43 0000 MATTHEW CONSTUBLE 110239 DORSET ST $341.04 1077 601 14 0001 SAMIR A AND ROBIN E LAKKEES TR 10134 FOOTHILL BL $228.99 1077 641 25 0000 JAMES F BASONE 8017 MALVEN AVE $136.75 1077 672 010000 XIAOHANG WANG 17301 BELPINE PL#1 _ $10&52 1077 673 33 0000IW ILLARD MORAN 111220 TERRA VISTA PKWY#94 __ $97.28 1077 673 44 0000 ESTELA D PEREZ 111192 TERRA VISTA PKWY#104 $788.04 1077673 59 0000 INGA LIN _ 111236 TERRA VISTA PK#63r $153.32 1077 681 21 0000 1REINA P DUARTE 111123 WOODVIEW DR �__$328.56 1077 721 33 0000 DOROTHY TRUJILLO REVOCABLE LIV TR 2 17760 DEVONSHIRE CT __1 $241.92 1077 722 37 0000 DSJ HOLDING COMPANY LLC 11058 HASTINGS CT $333.67 1077 741 45 0000 TASHA WILLS 7646 SANDPIPER CT $501.17 1077 741 54 0000 SUSANA CHAVEZ 7621 FAIRHAVEN PL $369.92 1077 742 02 0000 1GG&J PROPERTIES LLC 11082 COUNTRYVIEW DR $574.35 1077 751 23 0000 DALLIN LLC 110638 COUNTRYSIDE DR $230.10 1077 751 43 0000 1 HECTOR CALZADILLAS _ 17662 BARRINGTON CT $744.28 1077 761 10 0000 1GLORIA L KIMBELL 17586 BELPINE PL _ t r $106.00 1077 762 38 0000 MOHAMMAD AQA KADIR X7569 CALAIS CT $104.65 1077 762 42 0000 DAVID A&WEISS, JOAN R KUBES LIV TR 11190 ALENCON DR $153.52 1077 762 51 0000 POMING LEO 11222 ALENCON DR $361.38 1077 822 39 0000 ARIAN JABAR JAMILI 11219 LINARO RD $457.44 1077 841 39 0000 1SUNRISE MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC 7837 DANNER CT $416.08 1077 882 51 0000TMARK J & PAMEY K MARTIN REV LIV TR 110375 CHURCH ST#13 $148.41 Page 9 of 13 • EXHIBIT A - P6O4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 1087 091 19 0000IWENZHANG 12380 MACON DR $109.76 --- -- -------------- 1087 111 40 0000 CFK TRUST 12242 SCARLET WAY _ $97.28 1087 121 04 0000 QING ZHANG 12461 MELON DR L $459.84 1087 141 18 0000 DIANE PRICE 12532 MELODY DR $408.82 1087 161 14 0000 HANNAH SIM 12750 MEDITERRANEAN DR $145.50 1087 161 17 0000 MEDITERRANEAN TRUST 12780 MEDITERRANEAN DR $153.52 1087 251 10 0000 KEVIN BUTLER 5613 STONEVIEW RD $547.36 1087 281 14 0000[DONALD T DLUGOS 12852 N RIM WAY $109.76 1087 311 25 0000IDANIELP BARRS 112594 TEJAS CT $153.52 1087 321 31 0000 ZHICHENG LIU 112684 SOCORRO DRI $109.76 1087 331 59 0000 RUBEN CARDENAS 5642 CARMELLO CT $127.99 1087 361 13 0000 SHANGFU XIAO 12872 SEAHORSE DR $159.00 1089 041 18 0000 JAMES V DAWSON 7217 ALOE CT $380.67 1089 051 12 0000 ROYAL ELITE INVESTMENTS INC 7067 FONTAINE PL $332.32 1089 051 19 0000 MICHAEL WINCHESTER 7001 FONTAINE PL I $209.76 1089 061 18 0000ISU KUEI CHEN 6818 PALO VERDE PL $143.31 1089 061 22 0000(BENJAMIN MENESES 6778 PALO VERDE PL $153.52 1089 061 40 0000 ITIMOTHY L CHASE _6859 PALO VERDE PL $202.38 1089 091220000 IGNACIO CALERO 12190 STRATFORD DR __$328.56 1089 091 45 0000 RAED SAFI 6864 BIRMINGHAM PL $459.84 1089092 56 0000 MAYFIELD, LARRY E 12208 STRATFORD DR $337.52 1089 101 06 0000 JASIEL EMILIO QUINTERO SICAIROS 6639 AMERSHAM PL $109.76 1089 101 26 0000 FRANK L PROUTY 6608 CHESHIRE PL $109.76 1089 101 28 0000 DRS NV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 6626 CHESHIRE PL -r $161.75 1089 101 41 0000 KIMBERLY EGELAND 12240 SILVERBERRY ST $363.08 1089 101 45 0000 ELENA M ARMENDAREZ 112208 SILVERBERRY ST $295.52 1089 111 15 0000 THOMAS J GIORDANO 6596 PALO VERDE PL $196.08 1089 121 04 0000 EDITH M WILLIAMS 6565 PALO VERDE PL $459.84 1089 141 13 0000 QUENTIN D JOHNS _ 6717 FAIRWINDS CT _ _ $311.50 1089 151 35 0000 KATHY A LUGO 6611 AUTUMN GLEN CT $153.52 --------------- ------------------ --- -- 1089 161 300000 WIJAYA SULAEMAN 6513 TORINO RD $262.92 1089 171 41 0000 TAROOB SLMANI 6636 BRINDISI CT $209.84 1089 192 42 0000 ANTONIO G ALDRETE 111525 MARCELLO WAY 1 $633.88 1089 201 47 0000 ICOLIN SATCHELL 111615 SIENNA DR $582.42 1089 201 55 0000 WEN HUA LIU 11651 BRINDISI WAY $197.28 1089 211 10 0000 J C W LLC _ 11674 PORTOFINO DR $631.96 1089 211 28 0000 RHONDA LEWIS 11683 PORTOFINO DR $136.30 1089 221 120000 WILLIAM&KHIEM ESKEN FAM TR 06/16/82 6939 GALATINA PL _ $546.19 1089 221 20 0000 OMAR CABRERA 6968 CANOSA PL $459.84 1089 232 08 0000 ALLEN H YOO 76535 VIANZA PL $183.28 1089 232 38 0000 MONICA MOLINA 6584 VENETO PL $297.32 1089 241 22 0000 ANDY TAKIEDDINE 16612 MONTE CARLO PL 1 $241.04 1089 261 45 0000"SAMIR E BAHOUTH 111392 NAPOLI DR I $88.52 1089 272 06 0000 MIGUEL A ECHEVARRIA 11441 LUGANO DR $459.84 1089 272 07 0000 RICHARD R COURTRIGHT 11431 LUGANO DR $109.76 1089 272 23 0000 TERRY L MUNDY 7030 MONZA PL $722.40 1089 301 13 0000 ANASA T LAVENDER 11831 TRAPANI DR _ $141.04 1089 301 47 0000 ARODZ 6969 BELLUNO PL $131.64 1089 311 31 0000 RANDY S LUCAS 11788 FORLI DR 1 $1,012.77 1089 313 25 0000 WILSON A AGUILAR 7090 TOLENTINO PL $481.72 1089 351 39 0000 JACK CHANG FAMILY TR J7163 BRENO PL $187.06 1089 361 08 0000 YINGQI TANG 1 7209 RAVENSWOOD PL $350.93 1089 361 24 0000 PRICE FAMILY REV TRUST 11347 BROKEN BRANCH DR $124.64 1089 361 43 0000 LI-CHIN CHAN CHENG 11379 WILLIAMS RIDGE DR $459.84 1089 371 18 0000 RENATO R VELEZ 11503 AMELIA DR $222.28 1089 381 07 0000 ITERRANCE LYNCH 7128 SCALEA PL $396.16 Page 10 of 13 EXHIBIT A P6O5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name • Property Address Amount 1089 384 12 0000 1 HUE THANH NGUYEN 17138 SANTO PL $304.84 1089 384 42 0000 HA LIVING TRUST 111822 MONTELLA DR I $153.52 1089 385 14 0000IANA CECILIA ARCE • 7185 CARANO PL $109.76 1089 386 03 0000 KATHERINE MOORE _ _ 17154 TRIVENTO PL $94.80 1089 386 04 0000 MARIO ARANGUIZ 7146 TRIVENTO PL $109.76 1089 391 09 0000 MANJIANG YE 7249 SANZA PL _ $155.71 1089 392 07 0000 IMANEESH MAGGO 17249 TRIVENTO PL $173.21 1089 392090000 VINH KHAC HUYNH -7265 TRIVENTO PL $525.48 _ 1089 392 39 0000 GERARDO MANCINAS 17277 COMISO WAY x__$104.80 1089 392 50 0000 FIDE OSIFESO _ _111832 LETINI DR x $241.04 1089 411 25 0000 1JOSHUA C SCARBROUGH 16647 MAIDENHAIR CT __L_ $569.24 1089 411 40 0000 JOHN FRED MURSA 16624 MIMOSA PL $104.65 1089 431 21 0000 BUFFY MURRAY 112268 BELLFLOWER CT $454.01 1089 431 36 0000 LUIS G BUENROSTRO __ 12335 BELLFLOWER CT $119.84 1089 451 29 0000 GLORIA M DEGUZMAN 16605 BAMBOO PL � $217.70 1089 462 16 0000(JOSEPH R LUCERO • 112676 VERBENA CT $328.56 1089 481 43 0000 1MARK R CHASE 112813 CARISSA CT $706.70 1089 481 49 0000 i MARTIN DURAN 16571 ARABIS PL I $284.56 1089 491 63 0000 ROSE MARY RICO REV TR 6599 ARABIS PL $557.18 1089 521 01 0000 ETHAN MIZER 12406 COLUMBINE WAY $197.28 1089 522 06 0000 ROBERT D III & DONNA L GAY REV TR 1 6930 BASSWOOD PL $153.52 1089 522 19 0000 JUDITH DAVID 12354 LILY CT $533.57 1089 522 40 0000 ARBY E FIELDS 16992 BASSWOOD PL $240.24 1089 531 02 0000 JOHN CAKLOVIC 12419 IRONBARK DR $319.52 1089 532 12 0000 HARKANWAR BAJWA J2395 BLAZING STAR CT $237.39 - ------ --- --------------------1089 532 17 0000 1OCTAVIO BARRON SR _ 112371 BLAZING STAR CT $284.80 1089 551 81 0000 DONALD L SEDILLO 12473 VERONICA CT $178.08 1089 572 40 0000 DANIEL A WESSEL _ 7172 TRAVIS PL $788.04 1089 591 27 0000 ALLEN FAMILY LIVING TRUST 12733 LUCERNE CT $347.92 1089 592 21 0000 DONALD LOWDERMILK 7111 POWELL PL $168.56 1089 59245 0000,CRUZ MONTANEZ 17169 DUNMORE PL $159.52 1089 592 75 0000 EARL LOWERY 17146 CHANEY CT $124.64 1089 592 78 0000 1ADOLFO LARGAESPADA 17168 CHANEY CT __$478.80 1089 601 48 0000 CHRISTOPHER CALZADA j 12763 HENSHAW CT _$134.80 1089 601 57 0000 LEALON MC COY 1-12757 _757 NICOLET CT x $611.11 1089 611 28 0000 HERNANDEZ, ANDREW J 17219 WESTHAVEN PL $1,012.77 1089_621 09 0000 JULIO R OJAS 12181 ETON DR _ __ $607.68 1089 621 36 0000 JAMES C MILLER '122_19 ETON DR _ $138.38 1089 641 35 0000 WILLIAM T WALTON '12445 HARWICK DR I $547.36 1089 651 18 0000 VALERIE UNGER 7129 WESTHAVEN PL I $276.32 1089 651 21 0000ITRINIDAD A MADRID JR 17153 WESTHAVEN PL [ $459.84 1090 021 24 0000 LA THEIA C BLACK 17353 ELLENA W#24 $739.90 . _ . 1090 022 30 0000 MARK ITUAH • _ 17353 ELLENA W#138 _ $109.76 1090 023 26 0000ALI SHARAFDIN -x7353 ELLENA W#86 $284.80 1090 023 36 0000 OMAR METWALLY 17353 ELLENA W#96 $109.76 1090 023 49 0000 CORINNE ANNE STEPHENS 17353 ELLENA W#121 $424.84 1090 023 53 0000 PIALA P STYADI 17353 ELLENA W#125 $230.10 1090 032 01 0000,ALI,ALI PORN 111564 STONERIDGE DR $109.76 1090 051 39 0000 I WEI-SHU JAN TRUST 111470SOUTHAMPTON CT _ $372.32 1090 061 08 0000 ROBERT MAYA 111327 DOWNING CT r $244.84 1090 061 27 0000 PATTERSON, DIANE M 111331 REGENT DR $193.68 1090 061 28 0000 ANTHONY C & RAENELL JT AGNEW LIV TR 111339 REGENT DR $158.47 1090 081 09 0000 ROSARIO PEREZ 7326 LEGACY PL $278.60 1090 081 51 0000 WILLIAM S HOWARD 111715 MONUMENT DR $328.56 1090 091 34 0000 HUI LIU 111840 GAGE DR $284.80 1090 101 07 0000 MICHAEL PADDEN 17461 SCHUYLER CT $166.67 Page 11 of 13 EXHIBIT A P606 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number _ Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 1090 101 24 0000 YARA BADDAY 17415 RUTLEDGE CT $150.29 1090 101 32 0000 RODEL M MELAYA M-7415 ETHAN CT $197.28 1090 101 33 0000 NANCY GONZALES SAIZA 117411 ETHAN CT $254.80 1090 102 32 0000 YANQING DUAN '11768 PARLIAMENT DR $656.76 1090 132 05 0000 LUBNA S AH MED _ _ _ 11846 MANHATTAN CT _ $459.84 1090 142 330000 CHU LIANG CHEN 7674 CONTINENTAL PL $209.84 1090 14236 0000 ROBERTS, KERRY E 7654 CONTINENTAL PL $148.41 1090 151 18 00007GUERRERO FAMILY TRUST _11548 BARRETT DR $108.96 1090 151 59 0000 MIGUEL J AGUILAR 17639 BYRON AVE $254.15 1090 152 02 0000 MINGXIN WANG 17569 HARDY AVE $284.80 1090 161 27 0000[ANDREW K YU _ 111433 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR#31 $127.29 1090 161 53 0000 1ZUBER, SADEK 111433 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR#5 $197.28 1090 191 10 0000[RAINEY-LEE TR 111450 CHURCH ST#89 $157.90 1090 191 46 0000 BRANDON STUBBLEFIELD 111450 CHURCH ST#83 $457.36 1090 193 08 0000 ANDREW YUNG-CHILIN ;11450 CHURCH ST#152 $208.22 1090 222 41 0000 DARREN TEIN-HSIANG CHIN 111860 ROCKINGHAM CT 1 _$474.76 1090 231 19 0000 TPEDRO G LLAMAS _ _11831 BUNKER HILL DR 1__ $459.84 1090 231 42 00001DINA ZAKLAMA 17841 DANBURY DR ___[_ $282.61 1090 231 47 0000 MARIZE SMALEY 11831 POTOMAC CT _ $329.29 1090 261 36 0000 DAVID R BISHOP 17406 FENNEL RD L $284.83 1090 261 51 0000 ALBERT SANTIGAGO 1.7460 HYSSOP DR _ $328.56 1090 271 38 0000 RUDY R BARRERAS 17578 HYSSOP DR _ $775.64 1090 291 10 0000 THOMAS TZE KEE WONG 112012 ASHFORD ST _ $312.48 1090 291 29 0000 GARY J RUPP 17722 HENBANE ST 1 $120.29 1090 291 470000 PAULINE V TOKI 17731 FENNEL RD $183.28 1090 291 56 0000 ADRIAN SOLIS 17731 HYSSOP DR $459.84 1090 301 13 0000 MANUEL A ZAVALA -71944 EFFEN ST _ $123.64 1090 301 39 0000 UNGA, CHRISTOPHER M UNGA 11960 NORWICK ST _ $582.42 1090 301 41 0000 SHAOPING TED CHAN_ G _ 11982 NORWICK ST $311.99 1090 301 57 0000 ANN VONG 7836 HENBANE ST $225.04 1090 311 14 0000 HOPEMART LLC 112016 STAFFORD ST $172.15 1090 311 45 0000 SHIRIN JALILI 112014 DORSET ST $171.02 1090 401 65 0000 LEJON FLOT 12855 CRESTFIELD CT $95.72 1090 451 11 0000 CARLOS G OCAMPO 17549 SILVERADO TRAIL PL $547.36 1090 482 12 0000 CHU LIANG CHEN ____ 7709 HESS PL#3 $470.05 1090 482 43 0000 NUNEZ FAMILY TRUST 17736 HESS PL#3 $459.84 1090 483 01 0000 MATT Y YUCELEN 12227 N MAIN STREET#3 $109.76 1090 483 33 0000 MARLO R AUBERT 112179 N MAIN STREET#1 $136.06 1090 483 39 0000 AMANDA B RICHARD _ 17744 CHAMBRAY PL#1 $530.59 1090 493 31 0000 STEVEN FAI WONG 17686 PAPYRUS PL#2 r $282.61 1090 501 32 0000 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (TR) 112595 CHIMNEY ROCK DR I $336.16 1090 511 40 0000 YINGZI LIU POTTS REVOCABLE LIVING TR 17622 IRON HORSE PL $328.56 1090 512 16 0000 SOPHIA C LANGFORD L12851 SILVER ROSE CT $164.46 1090 601 06 0000 DCMORE LLC 112838 FOOTHILL BL $162.14 1090 601 17 0000 WINFUND INVESTMENT LLC _ 12732 FOOTHILL BL#104 _ $105.37 1100 011 46 0000 HONGYAN LIU _ 112930 COLONIAL DR $175.40 1100 011 87 0000 WEIXIN SHI 17331 SHELBY PL#15 $109.76 1100 021 21 0000[VICTOR M MENDOZA 112995 QUAIL CT I $109.76 1100 021 61 0000 WILLIE J BUSH 17482 BUNGALOW WAY L $241.04 1100 041 29 00001RUBEN J LAGUNA _ 113029 LOIRE VALLEY DR _L__$582.42 1100 041 41 0000 1THEADORE R MCHENRY 113061 MALVASIA WAY $94.15 1100 051 31 0000 MARC J JONES 17331 SHELBY PL#143 $109.76 . 1100 051 67 0000 BRANDON C OLSON 7331 SHELBY PL#63 _ $547.36 1100 051 68 0000 TAUFIQ A NASIM 7331 SHELBY PL#64 $96.80 1100 051 71 0000 ROLAND G MELGOZA 17331 SHELBY PL#67 $138.21 1100 052 41 0000(CHRISTOPHER S HOWELL 17331 SHELBY PL#23 $109.76 Page 12 of 13 EXHIBIT A P607 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name , Property Address Amount 1100 061 48 00001 SALVADOR GOMEZ 17446 BUNGALOW WAY $191.04 1100 061 49 0000(ROBERT GODINEZ 7452 BUNGALOW WA $153.52 1100 07_1 12 0000 1SISIRA LUXMAN JAYAWARDENA 7522 MORNING CREST PL L $193.89 1100 071 15 0000 TAT W LEUNG 7544 MORNING CREST PL $163.73 1100 072 17 0000 EDWARD E LOYD 7503 PINOT PL _ _ -- _ _ $224.73 1100 081 24 0000 JOSE A L TAFOYA 7620 TUSCANY PL _ $459_84 1100 082 24 0000 lJOY ONE_AL-WOLFSBERGER _ 7664 MORNING CREST PL r $459.84 1100 141 21 00001KEVIN SCOTT 7881 MARGAUX PL I $766.16 1100 141 46 0000 1DEMETRIA RABUN _ 77855 CHABLIS PL $317.66 1100 162 03 0000;YUAN YUAN WANG _ _ 18090 CORNWALL CT#42 $449.63 1100 171 37 0000 1RANDALL C COOPER 13207 LAMBRUSCO CT fl $197.28 1100 172 16 0000[ALLEN R ARVISO 13144 SYLVANER CT $409.84 1684 Parcels (TOTAL $230,296.54 • Page 13 of 13 P6O8 RESOLUTION NO. 15-085 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OF DELINQUENT CHARGES FROM BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR REFUSE COLLECTION, WHICH SHALL CONSTITUTE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND LIENS AGAINST THE RESPECTIVE PARCELS OF LAND AND SHALL BE COLLECTED FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AT THE SAME TIME AND IN THE SAME MANNER AS ORDINARY COUNTY AD VALOREM PROPERTY TAXES WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 8.17.280 and 8.19.280 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code every person who occupies any developed real property within the City of Rancho Cucamonga whether at a residential, commercial, or industrial location, or otherwise shall make or cause to be made with the City of Rancho Cucamonga authorized agent, appropriate arrangements for regular refuse collection services and it is unlawful for any such person to fail, refuse or neglect to do so; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 8.17.280 and 8.19.280 the refuse collection fee shall be a civil debt owing or due to the City of Rancho Cucamonga or its authorized agent or contractor from the occupant or property owner required to have service under this Chapter. An invoice for refuse collection service unpaid for sixty (60) days is considered delinquent; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 8.17.280 and 8.19.280 any fees authorized pursuant to this Chapter which remain unpaid after the delinquent date as set forth in this Chapter may be collected by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as provided in this Section; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has caused to be prepared a report of delinquent charges; and, WHEREAS, a copy of said report is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and made a part• of this Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the City Council scheduled 7:00 p.m. on June 3, 2015, at the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California as the time and place for hearing the report and any objections or protests thereto; and, WHEREAS, the City Council caused notice of the hearing to be mailed certified to the property owners listed on the report, at their addresses as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing; and, WHEREAS, at the hearing, the City Council heard all objections or protests of property owners, or their representatives, liable to be assessed for delinquent charges; and, RESOLUTION NO. 15-085 - Page 1 of 2 • P6O9 • WHEREAS, the City Council has made such revisions and corrections to the report as it deems just. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the delinquent charges for solid waste collection set forth in the report attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby confirmed. Section 2. That pursuant to California Government Code Sections 38790.1 and 25831, the delinquent charges set forth in the confirmed report shall constitute special assessments against the respective parcels of land and is a lien on the property for the amount of the delinquent charges. Section 3. That the City Clerk is instructed to file a certified copy of this Resolution, including the confirmed report, with the San Bernardino County Auditor/Controller for the amounts of the respective assessments against the respective parcels of land as they appear on the current assessment (tax) roll. Section 4. That the City Clerk is instructed to record a certified copy of this Resolution, including the confirmed report, in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. Section 5. Collection Procedure. That the assessments shall be collected for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for those taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of county ad valorem property taxes shall be applicable to such assessment, except that if any real property to which such lien would attach has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes would become delinquent, then the lien which would otherwise be imposed by this section shall not attach to such real property and the delinquent charges, as confirmed, relating to such property shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. RESOLUTION NO. 15-085 - Page 2 of 2 • EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address - Amount 0201 25_1 35 0000 JOSEPH A DANIERI 6275 ARCHIBALD AV $493.37 0201 321 23 0000 MARK NICOLETTE 6215 CARTILLA AV $182.48 0201 362 04 0000 DOROTHEA ARNOLD 6230 FILKINS AV $452.54 0201 413 02 0000 JACQUELINE SLAUGHTER-COLLIER 8250 GARDEN CT $459.84 0201 474 58 0000 DEBORAH QUESADA 9347 SILVERLEAF WA $126.53 0201 554 13 0000 ANDY MENG CHOU 10340 MAHOGANY CT $371.08 0201 563 21 0000 KING KENYON M LIVING TRUST 10308 SOUTHRIDGE DR $177.88 0201 594 12 0000 CLAUDIA GARCIA 6124 CALLAWAY PL $321.72 0201 623 50 0000 KEVIN BRADY 10829 PORT ST $156.08 0201 632 69 0000 JOSE CARRETO 6311 SEMILLON PL $153.52 0201 632 83 0000 STEVE GASSNER 6349 WINE CT $329.88 0201 691 69 0000 DEREK SAENZ 9920 LEMON AV $184.80 0201 782 04 0000 RITCHIE LEWIS 11154 ANTIETAM DR $197.28 0201 821 08 0000 EDDIE MEDRANO SR. 6168 REVERE AV $788.04 0201 922 06 0000 MARIA SANCHEZ 6351 SILVERWOOD PL $678.64 0201 922 16 0000 LAURA MUNGUIA 11249 SUMMERSIDE DR $210.56 0202 072 47 0000 GRACE MIRANDA 9396 LA GRANDE ST $870.86 0202 102 28 0000 VANESSA M JACKSON 6610 NANTUCKET PL $667.70 0202 102 38 0000 TAN LIVING TRUST 6662 BRIGHTON PL $142.58 0202 111 42 0000 CARLEE IVERSON 6733 JADEITE AV $482.35 0202 251 29 0000 JOSEPH CORNELIUSSEN 8450 MONTE VISTA ST $1,012.77 0202 291 10 0000 JAMES SHAFER 9052 LA GRANDE ST $261.32 0202 311 08 0000 RAFAEL DELEON 8714 LA VINE ST I $788.04 0202 331 26 0000 SHEYLA SALDANA 8691 MIGNONETTE ST I $560.91 0202 351 31 0000 RIGOBERTO AGUILAR 6867 CARNELIAN ST $678.64 0202 461 38 0000 HILLSIDE TRUST 8998 HAMILTON ST $186.34 0202 541 47 0000 JANE KENNEDY 8892 GALA AV P/O $459.84 0202 571 27 0000 ROGER HOWARD 6956 AMETHYST AV $153.52 0202 751 85 0000 SEAN HATCH 8955 LA VERNE DR $449.37 0202 831 42 0000 GREGORY DORMAN 9037 CIELITO ST $147.36 0207 111 16 0000 KAMEL HADDAD 8143 GROVE AV $98.91 0207 123 31 0000 JOSE RAMIREZ 8254 TAPIA VIA $138.20 0207 123 41 0000 LANI HICKS 8268 RED HILL COUNTR DR $680.19 0207 141 38 0000 WEI GONG 8345 GROVE AV $210.97 0207 161 15 0000 CHRISTOPHER J NORIEGA 8140 AVENIDA VEJAR $179.32 0207 161 30 0000 PAULA VICENTE 8251 VIA CARRILLO $105.44 0207 182 15 0000 SUMAN C SAGAR 8469 EDWIN ST $227.90 0207 232 05 0000 BINH NGUYEN ' 8214 SALINA ST $191.96 0207 235 17 0000 DALIA CORTES 8251 SALINA ST $109.76 0207 243 01 0000 WEI GONG 8795 VINMAR AV $158.77 0207 351 04 0000 LARRY A MICKELSON 8420 VIA LADERA $315.52 0207 421 01 0000 PLUMA FAMILY TRUST 8890 CHURCH ST $149.80 0207 451 09 0000 JAMES WALKER 8431 SALINA ST $134.80 0207 453 10 0000 GARY GOMEZ 8573 EDWIN ST $97.28 0207 541 11 0000 JUAN RUIZ 8367 MAIN ST $1,273.00 0207 541 36 0000 LUIS MARCOS 8410 MAIN ST $694.18 0207 561 08 0000 RAYMOND LOPEZ 8768 ANADA CT $280.52 ' 0207 591 45 0000 RANCHO CONDSO LLC 8471 MORENO DR U-9 $174.92 0207 591 61 0000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8483 CARSON PL U-25 $459.84 0207 591 70 0000 RANCHO CONDSO LLC 8440 CARSON PL U-34 $197.28 0207 591 72 0000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8430 CARSON PL U-36 $214.05 0207 591 75 0000 RANCHO CONDOS LLC 8440 SCENIC DR U-39 $132.51 0207 622 18 0000 R EDUARDO SARACHO 8546 SAN JACINTO CT $95.32 0207 631 18 0000 I EMAD NABIH 8715 PREDERA CT $229.84 Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 0207 671 11 0000 XU YA LIVING TRUST 8430 CARSON PL U-37 $109.52 0208 124 05 0000 PAUL BUNCH 7850 KLUSMAN AV $157.32 0208 124 12 0000 RICHARD B WESTBY 7831 LEUCITE AV $170.29 0208 132 20 0000 HUEISHIN INC 9550 SAN BERNARDINO RD $140.28 0208 282 20 0000 LIONEL ARRIAGADA 9738 HAMPSHIRE ST $295.52 0208 311 64 0000 WILLIAM TU 9853 CERISE ST $109.76 0208 361 07 0000 KARL K ABRIL 9218 CALLE VEJAR $421.19 0208 363 31 0000 MANUEL M RODRIGUEZ 9180 ARROW RT $1,206.18 0208 363 34 0000 US WEST LLC 9152 ARROW RT $180.51 0208 394 08 0000 JOYCE LAPALE 7966 MONTARA AV $137.76 0208 432 09 0000 ANTHONY ESTRADA 7375 LAYTON ST $263.49 0208 433 14 0000 CEDRIC A MOORE 9391 PEPPER ST $280.56 0208 454 03 0000 CATHERINE M KEAN 9105 CANDLEWOOD ST $119.00 0208 462 01 0000 JANAE LEWIS 7925 LION ST $197.28 0208 471 10 0000 CHARLES N LITTLEWOOD TR 7569 KLUSMAN AV $722.40 0208 501 03 0000 JAMES & DEBORAH FAM TR THOMPSON 7726 BERYL ST $145.37 0208 506 04 0000 WILLIAM LEON! LIVING TR 9165 HEMLOCK ST $181.23 0208 511 09 0000 HILL FAMILY TRUST AGREEMENT 11 7725 MONTARA AV $481.72 0208 533 05 0000 KAREN C FOOTE 7830 AMETHYST AV $582.42 0208 533 09 0000 BLANCA RAMIREZ 7835 LAYTON ST $503.60 0208 542 05 0000 RACHEL RODRIQUEZ 9550 PALO ALTO ST $295.52 0208 563 09 0000 DEBORAH MARTINEZ 7595 AMETHYST AV $201.48 0208 572 11 0000 DENNIS WILLIAMS 7681 KLUSMAN AV $493.58 0208 593 18 0000 LYNETTE CHALCRAFT BELAND 7398 BERYL ST $328.56 0208 651 07 0000 ELVIA GUTIERREZ 7924 KIRKWOOD CT $788.04 0208 703 15 0000 JOAN BYRD 7795 MALACHITE AV $582.42 0208 772 21 0000 IH BORROWER LP 9309 PLACER ST $108.56 0208 921 09 0000 DONAVAN R VREM REVOCABLE LIV TR 7444 AVILA AV $216.08 0208 991 02 0000 RAMONA BOWMAN 9310 TRYON ST $102.40 0209 032 11 0000 WILKINSON FAMILY TRST 9979 FERON BL U-C $117.99 0209 063 12 0000 MONICA L REYES 9893 FERON BL $251.98 0209 101 37 0000 GILBERT L PEREZ 10158 25TH ST $120.13 0209 145 18 0000 WHITE OAK LLC 8740 WHITE OAK AV $1,350.96 0209 171 43 0000 INLAND CORPORATION 9592 7TH ST $462.14 0209 171 46 0000 INLAND CORPORATION 9024 ARCHIBALD AV $1,115.35 0209 191 13 0000 GEORGE T ASSANELLI TR 8956 BELMONT AV $219.16 0209 211 40 0000 SETBISIUN LIGAT TRUST 10096 6TH ST U-O,P $392.69 0209 261 50 0000 9237 BALLY COURT LLC 9237 BALLY CT $1,763.60 0209 292 01 0000 GUADALUPE V MORALES 9396 MEADOW ST $329.88 0209 295 01 0000 NAOMI GRIJALVA 9396 6TH ST $461.35 0209 312 10 0000 I ELSA PEREZ 8671 PINE DR $164.18 0209 321 32 0000 MARVIN L WRIGHT 9232 MALACHITE AV $201.04 0209 341 30 0000 ICHU HAN CHIU 9370 DEERBROOK ST $167.28 0209 361 55 0000 PEDRO A. RIVERA 9534 CAMERON ST $109.76 0209 431 10 0000 TAN LIVING TRUST 10171 BEDFORD DR $153.52 0209 431 25 0000 ALEXANDER OSIFESO 8618 ANDOVER PL $269.94 0210 481 64 0000 HO LIVING TRUST 9529 BROOK DR $103.71 0210 512 43 0000 PO WUN HSIAO 9488 CEDAR GLEN CT $192.17 0210 641 05 0000 WEN HAO CHEN 9536 HARVEST VISTA DR $377.43 0225 231 56 0000 FONG LIVING TR 11413 PYRAMID PEAK CT $348.58 0225 241 33 0000 JOHN MICHAEL WALLER 11533 MOUNT RAINIER CT $127.70 0225 261 49 0000 JOSE ABRAIRA 11542 MOUNT BALDWIN CT $248.56 0225 281 21 0000 RICHARD A ROSALES 6430 MOUNT RUSHMORE PL $109.84 0225 281 22 0000 CANNIES CHAN 6422 MOUNT RUSHMORE PL $109.76 Page 2 of 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 0225 321 08 0000 DARRYL PHILLIPS 6429 CALICO PEAK PL $611.11 0225 401 06 0000 MELVIN WARE 6192 ASHTON PL $470.78 ' 0225 521 08 0000 ROGER CRAW FORD 12644 PARKE CI $926.70 0225 611 04 0000 ALBERTO ROMERO 12874 BRIDGE WATER DR $775.89 0225 621 48 0000 BENJAMIN MENESES 12239 KEENLAND DR $241.04 0225 642 09 0000 I FABIO TOVAR 5981 GREYVILLE PL $234.88 0225 721 52 0000 THAIRA ALI 12228 SPLIT REIN DR $241.04 0226 231 680000 BRENDA BELL 5660 SAN MARINO WA I $284.80 0226 272 28 0000 BERNARD P CHAVEZ JR. 14108 SAN GABRIEL CT I $697.18 0226 502 01 0000 CHENG HSIEN CHANG 13949 DOVE CANYON WA $214.81 0227 061 66 0000 CHARLES E GIBBONS 12920 VICTORIA ST $441.13 0227 256 04 0000 BRANDON P LINE 13091 VISTA ST $519.13 0227 504 02 0000 'STUART SACKLEY 12932 CARNESI DR $835.09 0227 693 39 0000 I COLERIDGE BERNARD STROUD 7122 ACORN PL $790.32 0227 821 27 0000 RALPH C KIES 13390 WHITESTONE PL $607.08 0229 031 40 0000 THM ENTERPRISE LLC 12469 FOOTHILL BL $385.59 0229 031 41 0000 THM ENTERPRISES LLC 12489 FOOTHILL BL $739.67 0229 192 17 0000 ANITA VASQUEZ 13221 WHITTRAM AV $236.18 0229 305 11 0000 IJUAN MARTINEZ 8199 CORNWALL AV $443.26 0229 311 01 0000 AMOS JOHN SLOVACEK 13004 CHESTNUT AV $124.64 0229 313 16 0000 MILDRED ROBILLARD 8256 EMMETT AV $892.21 1061 141 31 0000 KATHERINE BERGREEN 5392 VIA SERENA $1,021.68 1061 172 10 0000 ROBERT HERNANDEZ 8348 ALMOND ST $123.10 1061 361 19 0000 ERIC ANDERSON 8960 CAMELLIA CT $459.84 1061 721 35 0000 GARY W GRAY 8225 BEECHWOOD DR $109.76 1061 781 10 0000 JOSEPH RICHARD BARON 9244 CARRARI CT $720.30 1062 151 12 0000 ROBERT M ROMERO 8424 THOROUGHBRED ST I $1,260.01 1062 151 17 0000 ARLENE SILVERA 8334 THOROUGHBRED ST $201.50 1062 161 02 0000 ISAIAS SOLANO 8287 THOROUGHBRED ST $472.37 1062 301 35 0000 LOUIS SPEARS 8558 BANYAN ST $153.52 1062 421 24 0000 RPOBERT J BECKLEY 9381 APRICOT AV $107.36 1062 511 51 0000 WILLIAM C ZEMAITIS 6315 HOLLY OAK DR $362.42 1074 041 02 0000 FRANKIE R LIRA 4949 ALMOND CT $847.56 1074 211 01 0000 NANCY PASOS 10015 HILLSIDE RD $509.16 1074 421 05 0000 MANUELA ULLOA 10782 WILSON AV $241.04 1076 032 25 0000 JOSE G VALENCIA 9766 WILLOW WOOD DR $455.22 1076 041 21 0000 HILDA ARAIZA 6723 LONDON AV $242.75 1076 151 29 0000 IZHALEH REZVAN 10435 GALA AV I $609.92 1076 161 68 0000 DAVID E CLARY 10312 HOLLY ST $180.51 1076 172 14 0000 ALVIN R JOHNSON 6958 LAGUNA PL U-A $163.00 1076 173 02 0000 MARGARET C RAMIREZ 9736 HUNTINGTON DR U-C $153.52 1076 181 16 0000 MONICA L JENNINGS 9815 YALE DR $134.80 1076 221 40 0000 LUIS D GONZALEZ 7040 CAMBRIDGE AV $599.80 1076 221 67 0000 7013 RAMONA AVENUE TRUST 7013 RAMONA AV $197.28 1076 251 05 0000 IRIS BORGES 10151 VICTORIA ST $153.52 1076 261 60 0000 RICHARD V DELACY 10161 MONTE VISTA ST $175.40 1076 341 32 0000 110637 HEATHER LLC 10637 HEATHER ST $341.80 1076 391 09 0000 I GRACE A KRAMER 10965 SANTA BARBARA PL $186.34 1076 401 30 0000 TIMOTHY ADAMS 6633 SAN BENITO AV $459.84 1076 531 33 0000 ROGER A LAWRENCE 10727 MORNINGSIDE CT $324.96 1076 601 01 0000 MR &TH FORTUNATO FAMILY TRUST 7087 CAMPBELL PL $120.70 1076 601 13 0000 OSCAR CEJA 7071 WOODBURY CT $459.84 1077 011 14 0000 GARRY A TURNER 7377•PASITO AV $481.72 1077 021 57 0000 MICHAEL HOSCH 7452 RAMONA AV $174.69 Page 3 of 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 1077 0271 60 0000 NESTOR SANDOVAL 7482 RAMONA AV $115.27 1077 031 92 0000 ANTHONY ESTRADA 7475 RAMONA AV $477.12 1077 051 24 0000 MARY LOU MCMAHAN 10160 PALO ALTO ST $587.52 1077 061 33 0000 PAMELA E WILLIAMS 10298 ALDER CT $144.92 1077 061 50 0000 ALISON E CLOSE 10291 MAGNOLIA CT I $117.86 1077 071 16 0000 MICHAEL GEORGE HOGG 7409 IVY LN $197.28 1077 081 03 0000 MAE ELDER 7328 MARINE AV $452.46 1077 122 10 0000 ROBERT C GARDEA 7323 CASCADE CT $445.58 1077 141 50 0000 FREDRICK COOPER 7452 VILLA CREST PL $394.20 1077 162 42 0000 I HARRY& BIBI SHEONARINE REV TR 11008.FRANKLIN DR $483.38 1077 251 53 0000 EFREM EFREM SARGENT 10450 BALSA ST $525.04 1077 311 26 0000 VICTORIA GONZALEZ 7527 LONDON AV $619.89 1077 371 05 0000 ROBERT FERRO TR 7750 CENTER AV $126.08 1077 391 38 0000 JORGE JIMENEZ 10177 DORSET ST $372.32 1077 391 43 0000 MATTHEW CONSTUBLE 10239 DORSET ST $206.16 1077 641 25 0000 JAMES F BASONE 8017 MALVEN AV $136.75 1077 673 59 0000 INGA LIN 11236 TERRA VISTA PK U-63 I $153.32 1077 741 45 0000 TASHA WILLS 7646 SANDPIPER CT $501.17 1077 751 23 0000 DALLIN LLC 10638 COUNTRYSIDE DR $230.10 1077 762 38 0000 MOHAMMAD AQA KADIR 7569 CALAIS CT $104.65 1077 762 42 0000 DAVID A&WEISS JOAN R KUBES LIV TR 11190 ALENCON DR $153.52 1077 762 51 0000 LEO POMING 11222 ALENCON DR $241.04 1077 822 39 0000 ARIAN JABAR JAMILI 11219 LINARO RD $357.44 1087 161 17 0000 MEDITERRANEAN TRUST 12780 MEDITERRANEAN DR $153.52 1087 251 10 0000 KEVIN BUTLER 5613 STONEVIEW RD, $547.36 1087 281 14 0000 (DONALD T DLUGOS 12852 N RIM WA I $109.76 1087 361 13 0000 SHANGFU XIAO 12872 SEAHORSE DR $159.00 1089 061 18 0000 SU KUEI CHEN 6818 PALO VERDE PU $143.31 1089 091 45 0000 RAED SAFI 6864 BIRMINGHAM PL $459.84 1089 101 26 0000 FRANK L PROUTY 6608 CHESHIRE PL I $109.76 1089 101 28 0000 DRS NV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 6626 CHESHIRE PL I $161.75 1089 101 45 0000 ELENA ARMENDARIZ 12208 SILVERBERRY ST $295.52 1089 121 04 0000 EDITH M WILLIAMS 6565 PALO VERDE PU $459.84 1089 151 35 0000 KATHY A LUGO 6611 AUTUMN GLEN CT $153.52 1089 192 42 0000 ANTONIO G ALDRETE 11525 MARCELLO WA $633.88 1089 211 10 0000 JCW LLC 11674 PORTOFINO DR $631.96 1089 272 06 0000 I MIGUEL A ECHEVARRIA 11441 LUGANO DR I $459.84 1089 272 23 0000 TERRY L MUNDY 7030 MONZA PL I I $672.40 1089 301 13 0000 ANASA T LAVENDER 11831 TRAPANI DR I $141.04 1089 301 47 0000 ARODZ 6969 BELLUNO PL I $131.64 1089 313 25 0000 WILSON A AGUILAR 7090 TOLENTINO PL I $481.72 1089 351 39 0000 JACK CHANG FAMILY TR 7163 BRENO PL I $187.06 1089 361 08 0000 YINGQI TANG 7209 RAVENSWOOD PL $350.93 1089 371 18 0000 RENATO R VELEZ 11503 AMELIA DR I $152.28 1089 384 12 0000 HUE THANH NGUYEN 7138 SANTO PL I $214.92 1089 392 50 0000 JIDE OSIFESO 11832 LETINI DR I $153.52 1089 411 25 0000 JOSHUA C SCARBROUGH 6647 MAIDENHAIR CT $569.24 1089 411 40 0000 JOHN FRED MURSA 6624 MIMOSA PL I $104.65 1089 431 21 0000 BUFFY MURRAY 12268 BELLFLOWER CT $454.01 1089 462 16 0000 JOSEPH R LUCERO 12676 VERBENA CT I $328.56 1089 491 63 0000 ROSE MARY REV TRUST RICO 6599 ARABIS PL i $557.18 1089 521 01 0000 ETHAN MIZER 12406 COLUMBINE WA $107.36 1089 522 06 0000 ROBERT & D L GAY REV TR 6930 BASSWOOD PL I $153.52 1089 522 40 0000 ARBY FIELDS 6992 BASSWOOD PL I $108.16 Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES DELINQUENT REFUSE ACCOUNTS Parcel_Number Property Owner Name Property Address Amount 1089 531 02 0000 JOHN CAKLOVIC 12419 IRONBARK DR $184.64 1089 572 40 0000 DANIEL A WESSEL 7172 TRAVIS PL $788.04 1089 592 45 0000 CRUZ MONTANEZ 7169 DUNMORE PL $159.52 1089 601 57 0000 LEALON MCCOY 12757 NICOLET CT $611.11 1090 021 24 0000 LA THEIA C BLACK 7353 W ELLENA U-24 $739.90 1090 051 39 0000 WEI-SHU JAN TRUST 11470 SOUTHAMPTON CT $372.32 1090 061 08 0000 ROBERT MAYA 11327 DOWNING CT $244.84 1090 061 27 0000 DIANE M PATTERSON 11331 REGENT DR $93.68 1090 081 09 0000 ROSARIO PEREZ 7326 LEGACY PL $153.60 1090 142 36 0000 KERRY E ROBERTS 7654 CONTINENTAL PL $148.41 1090 191 10 0000 RAINEY-LEE TR 10/26/07 11450 CHURCH ST U-89 $157.90 1090 231 19 0000 PEDRO G LLAMAS 11831 BUNKER HILL DR $459.84 1090 261 36 0000 DAVID R. BISHOP 7406 FENNEL RD $284.83 1090 261 51 0000 ALBERT SANTIAGO 7460 HYSSOP DR $193.68 1090 291 29 0000 GARY J RUPP 7722 HENBANE ST $120.29 1090 291 56 0000 ADRIAN SOLIS 7731 HYSSOP DR $459.84 1090 301 39 0000 CHRISTOPHER M UNGA 11960 NORWICK ST $582.42 1090 311 14 0000 HOPE MART LLC 12016 STAFFORD ST $172.15 1090 482 12 0000 CHU LIANG CHEN 7709 HESS PL U-3 $470.05 1090 483 33 0000 MARLO R AUBERT 12179 N MAINSTREET U-1 $136.06 1090 501 32 0000 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 12595 CHIMNEY ROCK DR $196.16 1090 512 16 0000 SOPHIA C LANGFORD 12851 SILVER ROSE CT $164.46 1090 601 06 0000 DCMORE LLC 12838 FOOTHILL BL $162.14 1100 041 29 0000 RUBEN J LAGUNA 13029 LOIRE VALLEY DR $507.42 1100 081 24 0000 JOSE A L TAFOYA 7620 TUSCANY PL $459.84 1100 141 21 0000 KEVIN SCOTT • 7881 MARGAUX PL $766.16 1100 141 46 0000 DEMETRIA RABUN 7855 CHABLIS PL $317.66 1100 172 16 0000 ALLEN R ARVISO 13144 SYLVANER CT $209.84 244 Parcels TOTAL $86,211.54 Page 5 of 5 Oil N. z�-0 e Q Pi CD o ' 3 QQ C . CD = p H w O (n = 1 D -% 7:3 n z CD i o 0 D n 0 CD• W• 2 01 O c n - R. cn Cn CD r+ V) V) B CD r+ C/) [/= it , t � ► 1 • • • � n D D � U ° C : mCD c o c,:, n w Q " Cl)O 0 o en 00 0'-.' - D a 6 - cn i K IV = N c m 0 W c Crli — CO O O C) Q Q Q D CO CD ( 0 Q _L = E+ O N CO .-+ (1' N S R CD 00 -� U) CD -0 0 0 o a, —, - QD W 3 c 0 �� �� � 'C $'. CD CD -.... I le OR 0 151 j . . ✓, /•on pc044 � z hID c n = cn ' 0 cD O o o0 Q C �(,..-- w 3' -a a ,--r i ,-+ cc, Po w a Z � ( = CD' o CD cn cn O • w C7 o O m m � O o `r' w � o , o w Q OD * I-I- c r7 D aCD p O m m = 0 ip m o (D co `c cn CD O 41-1411) s r-II, DO 7 ^ �F4 N Lo _ n z 0 , .. * 0 o - > c� T, 6 M71 o n w . o —, ..goo o zz e CD n Cl)___‘IF_- o ■ ihrik. D 0 ._ ,, ,. C) • 0 o o0) CD cc) CD n CD C (,) rmilM , 1'. .• 0 0• o n s: nz 0 CD C 0 y �LLS S P610 STAFF REPORT tat PLANNING DEPARTMENT 141,1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: June 3, 2015 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE RESIGNATION OF COMMISSIONER FRANCES HOWDYSHELL AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE THE VACANCY, AND ACCEPT APPLICATIONS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council consider and accept the resignation of Frances Howdyshell from the Planning Commission/Historic Preservation Commission and authorize staff to advertise the vacancy and accept applications to fill the position followed by a review of the applications with a tentative interview date during the week of July 13. BACKGROUND: Recently, Commissioner Frances Howdyshell notified staff of her impending retirement and subsequent resignation from the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission. Her notice follows 18 years of exemplary volunteer service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on various boards and Commissions including the Community Foundation Board, the Library Foundation and currently the Planning Commission/Historic Preservation Commission. Her letter of resignation with an effective date of August 26 is attached for reference as Exhibit A. The Planning Commissioners serve 4-year terms as outlined in Chapter 2.20.050 of the Municipal Code. The Municipal Code addresses the parameters should a vacancy occur other than by a regular expiration of the term of office. The Code states that "it shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor with the approval of the Council for the unexpired term. The term of any Planning Commissioner shall be extended for that length of time as may be necessary and convenient to appoint and set a successor Planning Commissioner." The Code is mute on the actual specific process used to bring new prospective candidates before the Council for consideration other than the "Mayor shall submit to the Council' the name of any person proposed for appointment to the Planning Commission ..." The last field of applications was culled and reviewed by the full Council (2013). ANALYSIS: Following the Council's direction to advertise the vacancy, a large display ad (Exhibit B) will be published in the Daily Bulletin on Monday June 8, Saturday June 13, Monday June 15, and Saturday June 20. Completed applications (Exhibit C) will be received until July 6. The applications will then be reviewed by Staff and recommendations regarding the candidates will be sent to the full Council to select the candidates to be interviewed. A tentative interview date held by the City Council is set for the week of July 13. Commissioner Howdyshell's term was to expire December 31, 2015 as well as Chairman Ravenel "Ray" Wimberly. Commissioner Wimberly will be eligible to seek re-appointment in P611 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT June 3, 2015 Page 2 December of this year. The remaining three Commissioners, Richard Fletcher, Lou Munoz and Francisco Oaxaca are serving terms set to expire December 31, 2017. Respectfully submitted,B 4►j-tt Planning Director CB/LS Attachments: Exhibit A— Letter of Resignation Exhibit B— Sample Advertisement Exhibit C — Sample Application • P612 May 27, 2015 L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member Honorable Mayor and Council Members: I thank you for the honor and privilege to serve the City of Rancho Cucamonga the past 20+ years in many capacities. Over these years, I have witnessed the city grow and mature into one of the most desirable cities for families to live and for businesses to provide employment opportunities. I am also proud of the many local and national awards and accolades the City of Rancho Cucamonga has received. I have served as a Commissioner on the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission since 2007. Being a Member of this Commission helping to shape the future growth, while encouraging high standards of growth and development, have been most important to me. I have taken this responsibility very personal, and have done the utmost to do what is right for Rancho Cucamonga's future. It is with deep regret but with great satisfaction that I submit my resignation effective the adjournment of the meeting of August 26, 2015. I trust and believe the city will be in good hands with the newly appointed Commissioner when appointed. I wish you all the best. With Warmest R-gards, aigiti 6-4 Franceyshell, Commissioner cc: John R. Gillison, City Manager Candyce Burnett, Planning Director is J. Schrader, Planning Secretary EXHIBIT A P613 EXCITING OPPORTUNITY! The City of Rancho Cucamonga is an established leader in the area of City Government and Community Development The City of Rancho Cucamonga is now seeking interested individuals to serve on the Planning Commission/Historic Preservation Commission The City is looking for an individual with a strong interest in local economic development, planning and design. Applicants must be a resident of Rancho Cucamonga and be at least 18 years old Applications are available at the City Clerk's office at City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA Telephone: (909)477-2700 And on the City's website: http://www.cityofrc.us/ Applications must be received by the City Clerk's Office by Monday, July 6, 2015, 5:00 PM EXHIBIT B rib* P614 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON THE LR N!�O PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ,,,RANCHO There are two requirements to serve on a City's Commission: 1. You must be a resident of the City; and 2. You must be 18 years or older. Name Address Zip Code Phone: Home Work Occupation Education (List highest year completed and all degrees.) PLEASE NOTE: MEMBERSHIP ON THE PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION WILL REQUIRE MONTHLY MEETINGS. THE COMMISSION MEETS ON THE 2ND AND 4TH WEDNESDAY OF EACH MONTH, AS WELL AS SUBCOMMITTEES, ADVISORY COMMITTEES AND OTHER TASK FORCES AS NEEDED. Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If so, please list: Why are you interested in this position? (Add additional sheets if necessary.) What do you consider to be your major qualifications? EXHIBIT C P615 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPLICATION Page 2 1. What do you see as the major planning issues facing the City in the next year? In the next five years? Ten years? (Attach additional sheets as necessary.) 2. What is your perception of the role of the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission in relation to the Community? City staff? City Council? (Attach additional sheets as necessary.) REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. Date: Signature RETURN YOUR APPLICATION TO THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE BY MONDAY, JULY 6, AT 5:00 P.M. A The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk's Office P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Office Hours: Monday thru Thursday, 7 am —6 pm P616 STAFF REPORT RANCHO LIP] Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Michelle Perera, Library Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council Library Sub-Committee's recommendation to reappoint Luella Hairston and Robert Coberly for another term. BACKGROUND As mandated by the California Education Code sections 18910-18927, municipal public libraries shall have a Board of Trustees appointed by the municipality's governing body. As outlined by the by-laws of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Board of Trustees, the board is mandated to provide oversight to the Library. Terms of office for the trustees shall be for three years, and all members serve in a volunteer capacity. The City Council Library Sub-Committee, at their meeting on May 27, 2015, discussed reappointments of Luella Hairston and Robert Coberly to the Library Board of Trustees. Respectfully submitted, Michelle Perera Library Director P617 STAFF REPORT ` e RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Michelle Perera, Library Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEES RECOMMENDATION REGARDING REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council Library Sub-Committee's recommendation to reappoint Heidi Soehnel and Kathy Sommer to the Rancho Cucamonga Library Foundation Board. BACKGROUND The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to fundraising for the Library. Currently there are 9 members appointed by the City Council, with the maximum number of Foundation Directors stated by the by-laws to be 21, and the minimum 7. The City Council Library Sub-Committee met on Wednesday, May 27, 2015 to discuss two reappointments for the Library Foundation Board, Kathy Sommer and Heidi Soehnel. Respectfully submitted, I . 1� Michelle Perera Library Director P618 STAFF REPORT e'at RANCHO Date: June 3, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Michelle Perera, Library Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL LIBRARY SUB-COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION BOARD RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council Library Sub-Committee's recommendation to appoint Pam Easter and Phil Rodriguez to the Rancho Cucamonga Library Foundation Board. BACKGROUND The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation is a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to fundraising for the Library. Currently there are 9 members appointed by the City Council, with the maximum number of Foundation Directors stated by the by-laws to be 21, and the minimum 7. The City Council Library Sub-Committee met on Wednesday, May 27, 2015 to discuss two potential applications for the Library Foundation Board, Pam Easter and Phil Rodriguez. The City Council Library Sub-Committee both felt the two candidates would be strong additions to the Library Foundation Board. Respectfully submitted, u Michelle Perera Library Director