HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-66A - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-66A
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, WEST PORTION OF
SUBAREA 6, AMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE
MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.00 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON
THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST BY
EAST AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING OFFICE DESIGNATED
LAND, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL
DESIGNATED LAND - APN: 227-141-14 AND 66; AND
RECOMMENDING DENIAL ON THE EAST PORTION OF SUBAREA 6,
REQUESTING TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE
MAP IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE WEST PORTION FOR
APPROXIMATELY 10.34 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH
BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST AND SOUTH BY
THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, AND ON THE WEST BY EAST
AVENUE - APN: 227-131-05, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
A. Recitals.
(i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for
Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific
Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application. "
(ii) On August 28, 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and also issued Resolution No. 91-65A recommending to the City Council that
the associated General Plan Amendment No. 91-02B, Subarea 8, be approved.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on August 28, 1991, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-66A
ESPA 91-03, SUBAREA 6 - CITY OF R.C.
August 28, 1991
Page 2
(a) Subarea 6 of the application applies to approximately 20.34
acres of land bordered on the north by the Southern Pacific Railway, on the
east by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the south by existing
Office/Professional designated land, and on the west by existing Low Medium
Residential designated land as shown on Exhibit "Al, " and is presently
underdeveloped with two single family residences. Said properties are
currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated
Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the west is designated
freeway and is developed with the Ontario (I-15) Freeway. The property to the
east is designated Low Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the
south is designated Office/Professional and is vacant.
(c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan and of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and will provide for
development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development, but land use incompatibilities may result on the
east portion of Subarea 6 because this area is adjacent to significant
transportation facilities; and
(d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element; and
(e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor on the surrounding properties, but land use
incompatibilities may result for the east portion of Subarea 6.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the properties located in the west portion of Subarea
6 of the application are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed
district and are compatible with existing and surrounding land use
designations as evidenced by the site's being bordered on the north and west
by the same land use designation and that the properties in the east portion
are not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district because the
triangular site is bordered on three sides by significant transportation
facilities; and
(b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor on the surrounding properties as evidenced by
the findings and conclusions listed in Parts I and II of the Initial
Environmental Study and that the proposed designation for the west portion of
Subarea 6 would reduce the intensity of future residential development on the
subject properties; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-66A
ESPA 91-03, SUBAREA 6 - CITY OF R.C.
August 28, 1991
Page 3
(c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan by promoting the retention of
Etiwanda's rural atmosphere through reduced residential densities.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed
and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that on the 28th day of
August 1991, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 91-03, west
portion of Subarea 6, amending the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map from
Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential
(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 10.00 acres of land and
recommends denial of the land use change for the east portion of Subarea 6,
as shown on Exhibit "Al."
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991.
PLANNING CO ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
C.7.2
/ r
BY: /� /.
i
Larr r McNiel, Chairman
Afr,
ATTEST: Brad lerrcretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of August 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
1 !IJ VICTORIA STREET ""
11i __ 1. ■1111■■
MI VL = ■ '
L i i
rl an
t: . i'aa�li:f.•J.IMaaae:a.aae:1•f.t'-� - i
IllIulJi a� . --
'ate SP1/
�
EI • II Pt • co tom.
��\\\\�• Eliwanda Specific Plan
:1 oa I,I�iI, I s
� Amendments 91-03
�','\ .. i
. Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan
vi
\� :
y •`\\ Amendments 91-02
LM \T\.. N
:yips \` \ LM - District Designation
a \ \\\ \\ PROPERTIES CURRENTLY
IIIII IIII \\\ DESIGNATED MEDIUM
\� RESIDENTIAL (8-14 UNDER
UNITS
NSI PER ACRE UNDER
oP
CONSIDERATION RESIDENTIAINATION
_ b \ (4-8 DWELLING UNIT§ PER ACRE)
Or \ ` \ W 1
1'�. - ESPA Subarea Nos.
f•b �� \ - FSPA Subarea Nos.
♦� X ':. ■
_\� •neaa'aea'q
UI,11111111111: w
\ \ i N
®
.. �:
...\\\\111 ■M \ Nom\ _ _ - IMO E
\\I ® \ 1 1• ``aa.
FA omm.I. . ■. ..,, ��\\ \ j° a II
i61171Ifa:UIOq'.: 1
11111;':47 TN
( 11111M 1111111 16
�._ ® __ h,...\\\\`;1111I %
Subarea 2 amended parcels
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ISM' ESPA 91-03, FSPA 91-02
PLA�NN`ING DIVISION TITLE:Specific Plan Amend. Location Map = N
EXHIBIT: 'A1• SCALE: