HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014/08/05 - Agenda Packet THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
h rie
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
Lai AGENDA
cam"oNGA AUGUST 5, 2014 - 7:00 P.M.
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
Rains Room
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER 1
Roll Call
Regular Members: Richard Fletcher_ Francisco Oaxaca
Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger
Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_
Lou Munoz
II. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS
The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives.
Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to
20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues
and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design
Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission.
Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as
applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although
the Committee may open the meeting for public input.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR
CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot
office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site located south of Mission Park
Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within the Industrial
Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09.
Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning
Map Amendment DRC2014-00126.
1 of 2
warlaiAt
ay DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA
Lai
tip AUGUST 5, 2014
HO
CftONGA
B. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2013-00789 - ROUTE 66
IECA - A request to preserve the Historic Cucamonga Service Station
including restoring the front building (Phase 1)and to reconstruct the rear
2,391 square foot service garage (Phase 2) within the Foothill Boulevard
Specialty Commercial (SC) District, located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard -
APN: 0208-153-05.
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law
prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the
Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent
meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an
11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with
the consent of the Committee.
I, Gail Elwood, Office Specialist II for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,hereby certify that a
true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 23, 2014, at least
72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic
Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.
2 of 2
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag August 5, 2014
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00127 -
COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and
architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6-acre project site
located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue within
the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09.
Related cases: General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map
Amendment DRC2014-00126. •
Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 135,183 square foot
industrial building on 6.6 acres for a site that is bounded by Mission Park Drive to the
north, Richmond Place to the west and Buffalo Avenue to the east. There is an existing
commercial development to the south. The project will take vehicle access from
Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue.
The project site is currently zoned Industrial Park (IP) which does not permit warehouse
uses over 50,000 square feet in size. The applicant is requesting to change the zoning
to General Industrial in conformance with the existing development to the north, east,
and west. Staff has indicated to the applicant that they were in support of the concept of
changing the zoning. The project is in conformance will all other standards of the
Development Code including parking, setbacks, landscape coverage, site
improvements, and building design.
Staff Comments: Staff is pleased with the site and building design. Each face of the
building is articulated and the roof parapets vary in height to provide visual interest.
Large expanses of glass have been used at the corners of the building and on the
pop-outs. Clearstory windows are used around the building to add additional visual
interest.
Staff's main concern with the building design is whether the proposed stone veneer is
appropriate for an industrial building or is more appropriate for a commercial building.
Staff feels that if stone veneer is used, it should be limited to the building entrance and
eliminated from the other locations. Consideration should also be given to adding a
single clerestory window to the faux tower element on the south elevation to add visual
interest and to break up this wall plane.
Major Issues: None.
Secondary Issues:
1. Whether the stone veneer is appropriate for an industrial building; and, if it is,
whether it should be limited to the two entrances to the building.
2. Whether a single clerestory window should be added to the faux tower element on
the south elevation
DRC AGENDA
DRC2014-00127 — COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC.
August 5, 2014
Page 2
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the design
issues raised by staff and forward the project to the Planning Commission for their
review with any recommended design changes incorporated into the final submittal.
Design Review Committee Action:
Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag
Members Present:
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Mayuko Nakajima August 5, 2014
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2013-00789 - ROUTE 66 IECA - A request to
preserve the historic Cucamonga Service Station including restoring the front building (Phase 1)
and to reconstruct the rear 2,391 square foot service garage (Phase 2) within the Foothill
Boulevard Specialty Commercial (SC) District, located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard -
APN: 0208-153-05.
Design Parameters: The lot size is approximately 9,490 square feet and is zoned Specialty
Commercial (SC) within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District. The goal of the SC
districts is intended to accommodate 'specialty uses, which promote a special landmark quality
or create a special ambience that is unique to a particular subarea.' To the east, are two small
stores (key shop, florist); to the north, is single-family residential; to the west, is vacant land which
currently is pending a new commercial development; and to the south, are commercial uses.
The property originally included two buildings: a front and rear building. The exact construction
date is unknown, but is estimated to be around 1915 for both buildings. The rear building suffered
deterioration and collapsed in 2011 after a heavy rain. The front building still exists and is a
one-story Mission style structure. Architectural features include flat roofing with arched parapet
and coping, red tile roof, smooth-stucco wall surface, and a porte-cochere supported by square
piers.
Proiect Description and Architectural Design: At this time, the applicant is proposing to finish
Phase 1 of the project which includes a re-roof, new AC unit, restoring the interior, new foundation,
sandblasting and re-painting of the structure. An interesting discovery was made while
sandblasting the structure. They found the original paint scheme underneath the white stucco to
be yellow, blue, and red. The property owners conducted research of other Richfield stations and
found that this color scheme was quite common for these types of stations during this era.
Phase 2 of this project proposes to reconstruct the rear 2,391 square foot service garage. At this
time, this portion of the project is still pending and will be completed at a later date.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project. •
1. The color scheme is quite different from what the community is used to seeing at this historic
station, which is on a major intersection. However, this recent discovery and research
proves this color scheme of yellow, blue and red is an accurate representation of the gas
station's period of significance. Does the committee support the bold change in color for this
historic station?
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues.
1. None.
DRC AGENDA
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DRC2013-00789 — ROUTE 66 IECA
August 5, 2014
Page 2
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion.
1. None.
•
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval and
forward the project to the Historic Preservation Commission for review and action.
•
Design Review Committee Action:
Staff Planner: Mayuko Nakajima
Members Present: