No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/07/17 - Minutes July 17, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held on Wednesday, July 17, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manger; James Markman, City Attorney, Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Tarry Smith, Park Planning/Development Superintendent; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; Brad Buller, City Planner; Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Barrye Hanson, Sr. Civil Engineer; Betty Miller, Associate Engineer; Robert Zetterberg, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Joe Schultz, Community Services Director; Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Officer; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Councilmember: Pamela J. Wright. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he was reporting on what occurred at the Executive Session from the last meeting, that the Council unanimously directed his office to file suit challenging the adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report on the County's approval of the University Crest project and challenging the validity of the project in view of the fact that the County's housing element has not been approved by HCD, and any other grounds the City can find to validly contest that action. He stated a suit would be filed by July 24. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 2 (2) C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Jackie Bolda, 11849 Mt. Gunnison Court, thanked the City for the recent 4th of July celebration at Red Hill Park stating how much her family enjoyed the activities that were planned. Councilmember Buquet added the City staff put a lot of work into this successful event. C2. Marcus Solomon, 914 Placer, Ontario, asked that item G3 be moved forward on the agenda. Mayor Stout stated he could not do that because of all of the other items placed on the agenda. D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out that item D14 has a modified Resolution because of the inclusion of an additional easement. D1. Approval of Minutes: June 5, 1991 June 13, 1991 June 19, 1991 (Alexander absent) July 1, 1991 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 6/26/91, 7/3/91 and 7/10/91; and Payroll ending 6/20/91 for the total amount of $927,895.12. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 1991. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer & Wine for Smart & Final, Smart & Final Stores Corporation, 8675 Base Line Road. D5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Beer & Wine for Ron Shelley's Chevron, Ronald L. Shelley, 8687 Base Line Road. D6. Approval to authorize the Advertisement of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Heritage Park Ballfield Lighting Improvement Project as budgeted in the 1991- 92 Fiscal Year Budget. (0601-01 BID) D7. Approval of Public Safety Commission recommendation of a resolution supporting legislative efforts to empower peace officers to remove unsafe commercial vehicles from streets and highways. (0701-01 COMMISSION) (1110-00 STREET) City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 91-188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF P~ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO EMPOWER PROPERLY TRAINED PEACE OFFICERS TO REMOVE UNSAFE COMMERCIAL VEHICLES FROM STREETS AND HIGHWAYS D8. Approval of Map Parcel Map 12779, located on the north side of Banyan Street, east of Deer Creek Channel, submitted by Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. (1002-09 MAP) RESOLUTION NO. 91-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 12779 D9. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Tract 13565-1 thru Tract 13565-4, located north of 24th Street and East of Wardman Bullock Road and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities accepted by the County of San Bernardino on October 3, 1988, and transferred to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 1, 1989, both submitted by Standard Pacific, L.P. (0602-01 AGREE IMPR) RESOLUTION NO. 91-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR TRACT 13565-1 THRU TRACT 13565-4 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ON OCTOBER 3, 1988, AND TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON NOVEMBER 1, 1989 D10. Approval to execute Flood Control District, Zone 1, Almond Intercept Common Use Agreement No. FA 18905 (CO 91-041) for Box Culverts at Skyline Road and Almond Street. (0602-01 CONTRACT) RESOLUTION NO. 91-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR IMPROVEMENTS AT SKYLINE ROAD AND ALMOND STREET Dll. Approval to execute contracts for computer hardware and software maintenance with NBI Inc. (CO 91-042) in the amount of $14,292.00, Prime Computer (CO 91-043) in the amount of $32,747.00, and Westek Computer (CO 91-044) in the amount of $34,200.00, to be funded from Contract Services Account Number 33-4130- 6028 for Fiscal Year 1991/92. (0602-01 CONTRACT) (3) (4) (s) (6) City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 4 (8) (9) (io) D12. Approval to execute Renewal Agreement for the Citywide Emergency and Routine Equipment Pavement Repair, Shoulder Grading, and Debris Removal Annual Maintenance Contract (CO 89-132) with Laird Construction of Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the amount of $85,000.00 to be funded by Account Number 01-4647- 6028. (0602-01 CONT AMEN) D13. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13662, located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. (0602-01 BOND REL) (0704-18 NOT COMPLT) Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $166,576.00 $ 16,658.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13662 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D14. Approval to Vacate a Portion of an Alley located south of Ninth Street from Vinmar to Sierra Madre Avenues, setting the date of Public Hearing for August 7, 1991, and waiving administration fee for vacation request. (1110-18 VACATE ST) RESOLUTION NO. 91-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF AN ALLEY LOCATED SOUTH OF NINTH STREET FROM VINMAR TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUES MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar including the modified Resolution. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). E. CONSEN"E ORDINANCES No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13693 - LUNA - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to require that Parcel 2 take access from Northridge Drive for a residential subdivision of one acre of land into two parcels in the Very Low Residential District located on the north side of Northridge Drive, west of Haven Avenue - APN 201-182-29 (related file: Variance 91-04). (ITEM CONTINUED FROM JULY 3, 1991) Staff report presented by Betty Miller, Associate Engineer. (0701-06 APPEAL) City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 5 Mayor Stout re-opened the public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Charles Doskow, Attorney in Upland, and representing the homeowner's association, stated he felt the neighbors were a close neighborhood. He thanked the Council for continuing this matter to this meeting so he could be present. He outlined for the Council what had taken place at the Planning Commission meetings. He pointed out that the neighbors have an ambiance they want. He felt the roads should be made to comply with Northwoods' CC&R's. He felt the original application that staff had accepted was the best one. He asked that the City Council grant the appeal and reverse the Planning Commission's decision. Oliver Day, Architect in Walnut and representing Mr. Fan - owner of Lot 30, wanted to confirm his position and stated he did not think the Planning Commission's decision was made on sound principal. He added he felt all of the properties should be facing north. Steve Luna, 8990 19th Street, stated he was in agreement with Mr. Fan and the homeowners' recommendation. He stated, however, that they would propose an alternative plan to accept Plan I or J with an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication on Parcel 2 for future development in the event those two lots would develop as specified on the plans. Linda Frost, President of the Northwoods Homeowners Association, stated their concerns deal with the CC&R'S. She felt there was a sense of community in the neighborhood of Northwoods Development. She stated she would like to see the Homeowners Association continue. She expressed she was concerned how the rest of the area would develop because she did not want this same situation to occur again. Peter Fan, owner of Lot 30, stated he agreed with what the owners of Northwoods were trying to do. He stated he disagreed with Option I or J and felt Parcel 2 should access across Parcel 1. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Buquet stated he had met with Mr. Luna yesterday and had gone through the options included with this decision. He did not think there should be ingress/egress on Northridge Drive. He stated he would like the City Council to consider adopting options I or J, which were consistent with the City's street circulation plan. He also felt to preclude further encroachment to the south, that by doing this, there would not be a need for something to have to go down to Northridge. He felt access should be allowed from Parcel 2 through Parcel 1 as a flag lot on a temporary basis until exhibit I or J comes to pass as far as an approval of a project, at which time Mr. Luna would be required to have Parcel 2 tie into the extension of the cul-de-sac, or the extension of Cartilia. He added in the meantime, to protect the City, they could seek an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication, which would be the property necessary to tie in. He felt this would allow both properties to orient to the north and would solve the problem short term for both lots, and in the long run would provide for better planning of that whole area. He felt this would need to come back, but should only come back to the City Council and not the Planning Commission. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 6 Councilmember Alexander stated he felt what Councilmember Buquet stated was a viable solution, and added he did not think the two lots should have to comply with the CC&R'S of the Northwoods Development. Councilmember Williams felt Councilmember Buquet's suggestion was a workable solution, especially on a temporary basis the flag lot idea. She suggested something be drawn up so that the land was dedicated to insure that in the future the access would go over to the other street. She felt it should come back directly to the Council. Mayor Stout stated he felt there was not ever going to be an access to the south. He stated he did not have a problem with the flag lot originally proposed, and does not have a problem with Councilmember Buquet's or Mr. Luna's suggestions. He was adamant that these two neighborhoods should be kept separate. He stated he knew from the last meeting that Councilmember Wright also felt that the two neighborhoods should be kept separate. Councilmember Buquet stated he felt the City Attorney should prepare the necessary variance, and waive the cost of the original variance because of this action. Mayor Stout stated what he was hearing Councilmember Buquet say was that he would like to see a master plan set, which is exhibit I, prepare the proper documentation to do the split, and conditions be placed so that Parcel 2 would be oriented towards the potential cul-de-sac as far as design goes; however, it would take temporary access across the northern portion of parcel 1. Councilmember Buquet stated it would be a temporary access until such time as a development of an extension of the street for the cul-de-sac, and also the development on Parcel 2 would be subject to regular design review process and procedures for a single lot development, but oriented toward a future cul-de-sac that lined up with Cartilia. Councilmember Alexander stated he did not want to see a lot of pavement go down if possible. RESOLUTION NO. 91-182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, NUMBER 13693, TO SUBDIVIDE 1.0 ACRE INTO 2 PARCELS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NORTHRIDGE DRIVE, WEST OF HAVE AVENUE - APN: 201-182- 29 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to adopt the suggestion previously made by Councilmember Buquet and Mayor Stout with the understanding Councilmember Alexander may submit any other suggestions he may have, to be brought back at the next meeting. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 7 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the alternatives for Lot 30 were done for the purpose of study to determine what were the options and potential possibilities of the land. He stated when the applicant does decide to divide it, if they can come in with another alternative, they would be free to do this. He stated the Council's action tonight does not necessarily lock in that division of land as shown. He stated this was done to show potential division. Mayor Stout stated he felt they were setting a master plan for the street pattern which may have some effect on this. He stated the owner may not divide the lots as specified in the suggestion, but felt the street pattern should be set as a master plan and adopt a Resolution or whatever to do this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he felt they could work towards the Council's goal, and stated if a variance was necessary it would have to go back to the Planning Commission because they act in finality on variances and they have not done that yet. He stated they would try to work on something that does not require a variance, but that it if does, the Commission would have to have a shot at it, and if they approved it, it would not have to come back to the Council. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Planning Commission did approve a variance that would not require an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication as shown in the exhibits; therefore, a new variance would have to be applied for because that reduction in land in Parcel 2 would require a redescribed variance. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there may be a way to work around that. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like to streamline this and not take up a lot of time. James Markman, City Attorney, stated there would be a Resolution to come back in two weeks approving the new conficuration on whatever conditions staff thinks will create the least further required action. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 Wright absent). F2. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE FEE RESOLUTION FOR PERMITS AND USER FEES FOR PROVIDED SERVICES Staff report presented by Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director. (0401-12 FEES) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Frank Williams, 8400 Hermosa, representing the Building Industry Association, distributed a handout to the City Council and continued to explain what was in the news article. He stated the information submitted to the City Council in June, 1991 was not made available to him and was City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 8 interested in what was in that report. He stated he would like the Council to finish their work with the Planning Commission on the review processes before they go forward with this. He felt the Council has not heard anything the residents mentioned at the previous meetings. Councilmember Alexander asked what the cost would be per unit according to Mr. Williams information he distributed. Mr. Williams, BIA, stated his figures were per unit. Councilmember Williams asked him to explain the formula he was referring to. Councilmember Buquet commented on some of Mr. Williams previous comments and added this type of increase has not been done since 1984-85. He inquired as to why Mr. Williams was just now coming to the Council with this information at the final hour. Mr. Williams, BIA, stated he did not wait until the last minute, that he did not have all of the information until the end of last week. Mayor Stout added that Mr. Williams' comments were listened to at the previous workshop, but that the Council did not agree with all of the comments made. He stated Mr. Williams was previously told to put all of his concerns in writing, and that just because the City Council did not agree with him does not mean they were not listening. He stated staff had made the changes that the Council suggested from the previous workshop. Mr. Williams, BIA, asked about the Planning and Engineering fees, which Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director, explained to him. Mr. Williams, BIA, stated should the fees remain as is proposed, they would challenge this in court. Joe Oleson, Lewis Homes, stated they are a member of the BIA and have participated in this process. He stated his concerns were the Planning fees for Design Review and the RFP process. He stated staff has been very cooperative. He felt there was a connection between Planning fees and the work being done by the subcommittees of the City Council and Planning Commission on the Design Review process. Mayor Stout stated they were trying to make this revenue neutral. Mr. Oleson, Lewis Homes, stated because of the Planning Commission fees being so high, they were paying more for this aspect than the design of the project. Councilmember Buquet stated efficiency was used within the RFP being developed, and that as Mayor Stout mentioned, they were trying to make this be revenue neutral. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 9 There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Williams stated she felt what came out of the workshops is what was being proposed. She felt there should have been a continual audit of the fees in the past, and that it should continue in the future. She suggested to Mr. Williams that he bring his handouts to the City Council sooner rather than the night of the meeting. She felt the City's goal was only to recover 100% and no more. Councilmember Alexander stated if there were overcharges made because of the proposed increases, there would be a roll back. RESOLUTION NO. 91-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NOS. 79-1, 79-1- A, 79-1-B, 79-7, 79-31, 81-66, 81-66-A, 81-111, 82-168, AND ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 91-194. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:00 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:30 p.m. with all members of Council present (Wright absent). Items F3, F4 and F5 were considered at one time. F3. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLANAMENDMENT 90-02B - GROUP 66 PARTNERSHIP - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Commercial for 10.89 acres of land located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard east of Etiwanda Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternative land use designations - APN: 1100-161-04. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Commercial designation and issuance of a Negative Declaration. (0203-03 GP AMEN) CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-03 - GROUP 66 PARTNERSHIP - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map in Subarea 4 from medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Community Commercial for 10.89 acres of land located ont he north side'of Foothill Boulevard east of Etiwanda Avenue. The City City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 10 Council will also consider Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Commercial Office, and Specialty Commercial as alternative land use designations - APN: 1100-161-04. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Community Commercial designation and issuance of a Negative Declaration. (0203-05 FOOTHIL SP) Staff report presented by Alan Warren, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing for General Plan Amendment 90- 02B and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 90-03 - Group 66 Partnership. Addressing the City council were: Van Stevens, Forma, Civic Center Drive, stated they supported the staff report and the Planning Commission's decision. Andy Gurney, 12924 Chestnut, asked what would be built there. Mayor Stout stated there were no specific buildings proposed at this time, that this was only a zoning designation. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed for GPA 90-02B and FBSPA 90-03. RESOLUTION NO. 91-195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLANAMENDMENT 90-02B AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO COMMERCIAL (WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT DESICNATION) FOR 10.89 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE C~ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-04 RESOLUTION NO. 91-196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 90-03 AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT DESIGNATION) FOR 10.89 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-04 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Nos. 91-195 and 91-196. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (wright absent). * * , , , ยท City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 11 F4. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLANAMENDMENT 91-01A - PLANNING NETWORK - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Commercial for 2.0 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternative land use designations - APN: 1100-161-02. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Commercial designation and issuance of a Negative Declaration. (0203-03 GP AMEN) CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 - PLANNING NETWORK - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map in Subarea 4 from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Community Commercial for 2.0 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Commercial Office, and Specialty Commercial as alternative land use designations - APN: 1100-161-02. The Planning Con~ission recommends approval of the Community Commercial designation and issuance of a Negative Declaration. (0203-05 FOOTHIL SP) Staff report presented by Alan Warren, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing for General Plan Amendment 91- O1A and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 91-03 - Planning Network. Addressing the City Council was: Charles Cummings, owner of property to be rezoned, stated the Planning staff was very cooperative and helpful. He stated they are in support of what is being proposed. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed for GPA 91-01A and FBSPA 91-03. RESOLUTION NO. 91-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLANAMENDMENT 91-01A AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO A COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR 2.0 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-02 RESOLUTION NO. 91-198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS (i5) City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 12 PER ACRE) TO A COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR 2.0 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-02 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Nos. 91-197 and 91-198. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). F5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLANAMENDMENT 91-02B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas within the Etiwanda and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan areas: (0203-03 GP AMEN) 1. Approximately 14.20 acres bordered on the north by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by the eastern City limits, on the south by existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the west by a utility corridor. The Planning Commission recommends denial. - APN: 229-041-10. 2. Approximately 18.46 acres bordered on the north by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan boundary, which is approximately 530 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; on the east by a utility corridor; on the south by Foothill Boulevard; and on the west by Etiwanda Avenue. The City Council will also consider Commercial and Office as alternative land use designations for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Commercial designation for the properties from Etiwanda Avenue to approximately 1,277 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue and the Office designation for the rest of the properties in this subarea. - APN: 1100-161-01 through 04 and a portion of 1100-201-01. 3. Approximately 27.89 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by commercially designated land bordering Foothill Boulevard. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission has no recommendation. - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20 and 29. 4. Approximately 87.52 acres bordered on the north by Miller Avenue; on the east by East Avenue and a utility corridor; on the south by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan boundary, which is approximately 530 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and on the west by Etiwanda Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends approval. - APN: 1100-131-01 and 02, 1100-141-01 and 02, 1100-151-01 and 02, 1100-181-01 and 02, and 1100-191-01. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 13 5. Approximately 30.72 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the east by East Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by Miller Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission has no recommendation. - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 through 10, 1100-051-03, and 1100-061-02 through 04 and porti6ns of 1100-071-01 and 02. 6. Approximately 11.09 acres bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the southeast by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land. The City Council will also consider Office and Neighborhood Commercial as alternative land use designations for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends denial. - APN: 1100-051-01 and 02 and 1100-061-01. 7. Approximately 10.09 acres bordered on the north and west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land, on the east by existing Office designated land, and on the south by Base Line Road. The City Council will also consider Office as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends approval. - APN: 227-131-34 through 36, 52 through 54, and 61. 8. Approximately 20.34 acres bordered on the north by the Southern Pacific railway, on the east by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the south by existing Office designated land, and on the west by existing Low Medium designated land and divided in a north-south direction by East Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends approval for the properties west of East Avenue and denial for the properties east of East Avenue. - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-14 and 66. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan: (0203-05 FOOTHIL SP) 1. Approximately 14.20 acres bordered on the north by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by the eastern City limits, on the south by existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the west by a utility corridor. The Planning Commission recommends denial. - APN: 229-041-10. 2. Approximately 18.46 acres bordered on the north by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Boundary, which is approximately 530 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; on the east by a utility corridor; on the south by Foothill Boulevard; and on the west by Etiwanda Avenue. The City Council will also consider Community Commercial, Commercial Office, and Specialty Commercial as alternative land use designations for this entire'area. The (i7) City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 14 Planning Commission recommends approval of the Community Commercial designation for the properties from Etiwanda Avenue to approximately 1,277 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue and the Commercial Office designation for the rest of the properties in this subarea. - APN: 1100-161-01 through 04 and a portion of 1100-201-01. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the following subareas within the Etiwanda Specific Plan: (0203-05 ETIW SP) 1. Approximately 27.89 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the east by Etiwanda Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by commercially designated land bordering Foothill Boulevard. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission has no recommendation. - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, and 29. 2. Approximately 87.52 acres bordered on the north by Miller Avenue; on the east by East Avenue and a utility corridor; on the south by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan boundary, which is approximately 530 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and on the west by Etiwanda Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends approval. - APN: 1100-131-01 and 02, 1100-141-01 and 02, 1100-151-01 and 02, 1100-181-01 and 02, and 1100-191-01. 3. Approximately 30.72 acres bordered on the northwest by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the east by East Avenue and existing Low Medium Residential designated land, and on the south by Miller Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission has no recommendation. - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 through 10, 1100-051-03, and 1100-061-02 through 04 and portions of 1100-071-01 and 02. 4. Approximately 11.09 acres bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the southeast by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, and on the west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land. The City Council will also consider Office Professional and Convenience Commercial as alternative land use designations for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends denial. - APN: 1100-051-01 and 02 and 1100-061-01. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 15 5. Approximately 10.09 acres bordered on the north and west by existing Low Medium Residential designated land, on the east by existing Office designated land, and on the south by Base Line Road. The City Council will also consider Office Professional as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends approval. - APN: 227-131-34 through 36, 52 through 54, and 61. 6. Approximately 20.34 acres bordered on the north by the Southern Pacific railway, on the east by the Ontario (I-15) Freeway, on the south by existing Office designated land, and on the west by existing Low'Medium designated land and divided in a north-south direction by East Avenue. The City Council will also consider Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) as an alternative land use designation for this entire area. The Planning Commission recommends approval for the properties west of East Avenue and denial for the properties east of East Avenue. - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-14 and 66. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Alan Warren, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing for General Plan Amendment 91- O1B, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 91-03, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 91-02. Subarea 1 of Item F5 There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Subarea 2 of Item F5 Brad Buller stated the City Council had a letter of support regarding this matter. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Subarea 3 of Item F5 There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Subarea 4 of Item F5 Pete Pitassi, architect at 9267 Haven, representing Gramercy Properties (owner of Subarea 4), stated he felt if this was approved, it would be an unfair burden on the City towards its goals. He felt the mall also would impact this area. He felt the 1-15 noise and traffic would affect this area. He felt an "M" designation would be much more flexible for the private sector', and that the "LM" designation would decrease the number of units for a residential project which would raise the cost to purchase a unit. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 16 John Peterson, attorney, 351S. Lake Ave., Pasadena, representing Gramercy Properties, stated he has sent two letters to the City Council stating their position on this matter. He pointed out to the extent this proposal was carried through, the resulting displacement of development that would occur on the balance of the City was an item he felt needed to be addressed as far as Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). He mentioned that by stating there was no impact was an incorrect analysis with regards to traffic and drainage. He stated he felt the Council should review what was being done before approving this. He felt the Council should discuss this with the City Attorney, and because of the ramifications to the City, the potential for inverse condemnation before proceeding. Richard Werner, owner of property in Subarea 4 (20 acres), felt there would be a great cost because of drainage needed for this area which would be passed onto the home buyer, from $500.00 to $1,500.00 per unit because of the down-zoning. He felt there might be trouble getting underwriting for the drainage. He also felt there would be affects from the mall and the 1-15 Freeway. He felt the rezoning of Subarea 2 to commercial would have a negative impact to his property if it was approved. Jeff Burum, 6057 Della, stated their concern was how the down-zoning would affect the housing element and the affordability issue. He stated they had discussed a plan with staff, which he felt they were in agreement, and the Planning Commission felt it should be looked into. Their plan was the development of an overlay district that allowed the development of lots that are single family detached (4-8 units per acre) which the Etiwanda Specific Plan does not allow. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Subarea 5 of Item F5 Richard Werner, owner of 18 acres in Subarea 5 stated he did not think there should be single-family housing units near the 1-15 Freeway. He noted that the Planning Commission split their decision on this item. He felt there should be multi-family units along this corridor. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Subarea 6 of Item F5 Berney Svalstad, owner of property in this subarea, felt the City Council should reconsider the Planning Commission's decision and felt it should be designated freeway related commercial for commercial uses. He felt it would benefit the City greatly. He stated as an option he would suggest the City Council leave it as is and allow for recreational uses as he previously mentioned. He stated they would like to have a golf course/driving range situation for his property. Mayor Stout stated he felt a traffic study was needed. He stated he felt it would be better to find out if there were going to be any problems now. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 17 Mr. Svalstad stated he did not agree. Jeff Sceranka, 10068 Copper Mountain Court, stated he did not think it should be left at 8-14 units per acre, but should be made Neighborhood/ Commercial and designated as such so that Rancho Cucamonga residents do not go to Fontana to shop. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Subarea 7 of Item F5 There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Subarea 8 of Item F5 John Fowler, 7198 East Avenue, did not think his property should be changed to Low-Medium, and that it should be left at Medium because of the location. He felt the City would lose revenue if it were down-graded. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 91-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-028, SUBAREA 1, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 14.20 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY THE EASTERN CITY LIMITS, ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE WEST BY A UTILITY CORRIDOR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-041-10 RESOLUTION NO. 91-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02, SUBAREA I, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 14.20 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, ON THE EAST BY THE EASTERN CITY LIMITS, ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE WEST BY A UTILITY CORRIDOR, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-041-10 City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 18 RESOLUTION NO. 91-201 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B, SUBAREA 2, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO A COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.25 ACRES OF LAND 430 FEET NORTH AND 200 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE (APN: 1100-161-01 AND 03), AND TO AN OFFICE DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 1.5 ACRES BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY EXISTING MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, ON THE EAST BY A UTILITY CORRIDOR, AND ON THE SOUTH BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, (WESTERN PORTION OF APN: 1100-201-01), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-01 AND 03 AND A PORTION OF 1100-201-01 RESOLUTION NO. 91-202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02, SUBAREA 2, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO A COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.25 ACRES OF LAND 430 FEET NORTH AND 200 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE (APN: 1100-161-01 AND 03), AND TO A COMMERCIAL OFFICE DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 1.5 ACRES BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY EXISTING MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, ON THE EAST BY A UTILITY CORRIDOR, AND ON THE SOUTH BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, (WESTERN PORTION OF APN: 1100-201-01), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-161-01 AND 03 AND A PORTION OF 1100-201-01 RESOLUTION NO. 91-203 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B, SUBAREA 3, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL DESIGNATED LAND BORDERING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, AND 29 City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 19 ORDINANCE NO. 450 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN P~MENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 1, AMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL DESIGNATED LAND BORDERING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, AND 29. RESOLUTION NO. 91-204 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-028, SUBAREA 3, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL DESIGNATED LAND BORDERING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, AND 29. RESOLUTION NO. 91-205 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 1, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 27.89 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING COMMERCIAL DESIGNATED LAND BORDERING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-211-02, 04, 05, 09, 10, 15, 20, AND 29 RESOLUTION NO. 91-206 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-028, SUBAREA 4, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO A LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 87.52 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY MILLER AVENUE; ON THE EAST BY City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 20 EAST AVENUE AND A UTILITY CORRIDOR; ON THE SOUTH BY THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 530 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND ON THE WEST BY ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-131-01 AND 02, 1100-041-01 AND 02, 1100-151-01 AND 02, 1100-181-01 AND 02, AND 1100-191-01 ORDINANCE NO. 451 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ~MENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 2, AMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DESIGNATION WITH A MASTER PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR APPROXIMATELY 87.52 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY MILLER AVENUE; ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE AND A UTILITY CORRIDOR; ON THE SOUTH BY THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 530 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND ON THE WEST BY ETIWANDA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-131-01 AND 02, 1100-141-01 AND 02, 1100-151-01 AND 02, 1100-181-01 AND 02, '1100-191-01 RESOLUTION NO. 91-207 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC~24ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B, SUBAREA 5, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 30.72 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY MILLER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 THROUGH 10, 1100-051-03, AND 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, AND PORTIONS OF 1100-071-01 AND 02 ORDINANCE NO. 452 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ~24ENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 3, AMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 30.72 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY MILLER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 THROUGH 10, 1100-051-03, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, AND PORTIONS OF 1100-071-01 AND 02 City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 21 RESOLUTION NO. 91-208 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B, SUBAREA 5, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 30.72 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY MILLER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 THROUGH 10, 1100-051-03, AND 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, AND PORTIONS OF 1100-071-01 AND 02 RESOLUTION NO. 91-209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 3, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 30.72 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE AND EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY MILLER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-041-04 THROUGH 10, 1100-051-03, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, AND PORTIONS OF 1100-071-01 AND 02 RESOLUTION NO. 91-210 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B, SUBAREA 6, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 11.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY BASE LINE ROAD, ON THE SOUTHEAST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY~ AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-051-01 AND 02 AND 1100-061-01 RESOLUTION NO. 91-211 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 4, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 22 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 11.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY BASE LINE ROAD, ON THE SOUTHEAST BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-051-01 AND 02 AND 1100-061-01 RESOLUTION NO. 91-212 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B, SUBAREA 7, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, ON THE EAST BY EXISTING OFFICE DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-34 THROUGH 36, 52 THROUGH 54, AND 61 ORDINANCE NO. 453 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, SUBAREA 5, AMENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.09 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH AND WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND, ON THE EAST BY EXISTING OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE SOUTH BY BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-34 THROUGH 36, 52 THROUGH 54, AND 61 RESOLUTION NO. 91-213 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02B, WEST PORTION OF SUBAREA 8, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING OFFICE DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND - APN: 227-141-14 AND 66; AND DENIAL OF THE EAST PORTION OF SUBAREA 8, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE WEST PORTION FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.34 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST AND SOUTH BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, AND ON THE WEST BY EAST AVENUE - APN: 227-131-05, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 23 ORDINANCE NO. 454 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC~4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ~4ENDMENT 91-03, WEST PORTION OF SUBAREA 6, ~4ENDING THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.00 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST BY EAST AVENUE, ON THE SOUTH BY EXISTING OFFICE DESIGNATED LAND, AND ON THE WEST BY EXISTING LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND - APN: 227-141-14 AND 66 AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 91-214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-03, EAST PORTION OF SUBAREA 6, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10.34 ACRES OF LAND BORDERED ON THE NORTH BY THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY, ON THE EAST AND SOUTH BY THE ONTARIO (I-15) FREEWAY, AND ON THE WEST BY EAST AVENUE - APN: 227-131-05, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF Subarea 1 of Item F5 Councilmember Buquet asked James Markman, City Attorney, to comment on some of the statements previously made, i.e., inverse condemnation, which he continued to explain to the Council. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Nos. 91- 199 and 91-200. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). Subarea 2 of Item F5 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution Nos. 91-201 and 91-202. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). Subareas 3 and 5 of Item F5 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to refer this back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation to come back to the City Council when there could be five Councilmembers present. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). Councilmember Buquet clarified this would not come back before the next General Plan cycle which would be in about four months. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 24 Subarea 4 of Item F5 Councilmember Williams stated she felt it should be left alone and not take the recommendation because she did not think it was an appropriate place for single- family dwelling units and that it should be multi-family units. Councilmember Alexander stated he did not have any great opposition to the Planning Commission's decision. Mayor Stout stated he does not agree with the Etiwanda Specific Plan because it was supposed to be rural, and it was not. He felt there was too much density in this area. He felt this was the last chance for the City Council to do something about this area. He added he agreed with the Planning Commission's decision on this matter. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 451. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 451. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright). MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution No. 91-206 and set second reading of Ordinance No. 451 for August 7, 1991. Motion carried 3-1-1 (Williams no; Wright absent). Brad Buller, City Planner, added even with the vote made, it was still staff's and the Commission's intention to work with the property owners to develop standards that would allow them to reasonably build within the 4-8 dwelling units per acre, and to maintain the quality of development as mentioned by the Mayor. Subarea 6 of Item F5 Councilmember Buquet stated he was not sure the designation should be changed tonight and felt it should be deferred to the next cycle. Mayor Stout and Councilmember Williams felt they would like to get additional information on this matter before voting. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the Planning Commission's understanding was that the applicant wished to pursue commercial designation or the temporary use because they did not indicate they would be opposed to that. The Planning Commission asked that the applicant prepare the necessary application analysis that would support that recommendation as opposed to sending staff off to do the analysis to support commercial designation for the property, or look at the Etiwanda Specific Plan to come up with language that would come up with that use. The applicant indicated he would be consulting with a planning firm to develop the proposed language for that, and then the Planning Commission would consider that. Mayor Stout stated he did not feel that was unreasonable. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 25 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated with that in mind the Council could leave it at Medium designation until the applicant submits an application to change it to something else. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 91- 210 and 91-211. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). Subarea 7 and Subarea 8 of Item F5 Councilmember Buquet stated he was not comfortable with this at this time and would like a more firm recommendation before he makes a decision. Councilmembers Alexander and Williams agreed that Subarea 7 should go back to the Planning Commission. Mayor Stout stated he would also like a better recommendation on Subarea 8. He also suggested that proponents submit their comments in writing for the Council to review ahead of the meeting. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to defer Subareas 7 and 8 to the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). G. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. CONSIDERATION TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) Staff report presented by Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director. (0403-01COM FAC DI) (0401-03 ETI N DR) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Jeff Hollis, 13948 Crescenta, thanked the City Council for sending out the notification and information for this matter. He stated his concern was that once the new Districts were through forming, he would like to become part of the City and stop paying for their own services. He stated the comment he got today when he asked that question of staff was that it was an indefinite assessment. Mayor Stout commented on the Law Enforcement Tax stating the intent originally was that all of the Etiwanda North area would be included in this to include possibly even a substation. He stated in the event the City does not go further with the annexation process, this tax would be deleted. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 26 (20) (21) RESOLUTION NO. 91-215 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 91- 215. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). , 'A' , , , , G2. CONSIDERATION TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) IN THE AMOUNT OF $350.00 PER ACRE Staff report presented by Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director. (0403-01 COM FAC DI) (0401-03 DAY CK AD) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 91-216 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 91- 216. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). , , , , * * G3. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING SKATEBOARDRAMPS, HALF PIPES AND OTHER SIMILAR PHYSICAL STRUCTURES ON POSTED PUBLIC PROPERTY Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Director. (0401-01 RECREATION) (0401-03 SPORT ACT) Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Marcus Solomon, 914 Placer, Ontario, stated he did not agree that the City should be able to take away the ramps. He did not think the City should prohibit them from skateboarding in the parks. He stated he wished the Council would use some equilibrium that as they take something away they would give something back. Councilmember Buquet stated he did not think the City Council was taking something away. Mayor Stout asked if Mr. Solomon gives skateboarding classes. Mr. Solomon responded yes. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 27 Mayor Stout talked about the unsafe skateboard riders that he sees on the streets. Councilmember Williams asked Mr. Solomon if he thought the skateboarders would use what the insurance carrier has approved for equipment to be placed in City parks. Mr. Solomon stated he felt something was better than nothing. Melinda Oliver, 10147 Stratton, wished there was a skateboard park and stated she would use it if there was one. Rachel Whitman, 5605 Mesada, stated if there was a park, everyone would use it and follow the rules. Robert McKinley, 8244 Sunflower, stated he loves the sport and did not want to quit the sport. Tom Gudow, 8233 Janie, stated he wished there were parks where the kids could skate. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams,'City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 455. ORDINANCE NO. 455 (Urgency Ordinance) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 10.68 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 10.68.055 PROHIBITING THE PLACEMENT OF "SKATEBOARD RAMPS, .... HALF PIPES" AND SIMILAR PHYSICAL STRUCTURES FOR USE IN SKATEBOARDING AND SKATING, ON POSTED PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 455 as an Urgency Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS Hi. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. (0401- 03 LNSCAPE MD) Commen~s on this item were made under the Co~aunications from the Public section. (22) City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 28 (23) RESOLUTION NO. 91-217 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT AN ASSESSMENT WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 91- 217. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). H2. CONSIDERATION OF AN INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION FOR A PROPOSED $20 MILLION MULTI- FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING MORTGAGE REVENUE FINANCE BOND FOR VICTORIA WOODS APARTMENTS Staff report presented by Olen Jones, St. RDA Analyst. (0203-04 HOUSING) (0405-02 BOND/MORTG) RESOLUTION NO. 91-218 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INDICATING ITS INTENT TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF OBLIGATIONS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $20,000,000 FOR THE VICTORIA WOODS APARTMENTS PROJECT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 91- 218. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). I. COUNCIL BUSINESS No Items Submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMLTNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. Greg Corub, 13926 San Dimas, Brentwood tract, stated he did not agree with the assessment being charged. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, presented slides of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. Councilmember Buquet pointed out that-some other tracts are picking up some of the same costs as the Brentwood residents. City Council Minutes July 17, 1991 Page 29 Mayor Stout pointed out that 80 acres of landscaping is larger than any park in Victoria. Mr. Corub stated he would like to see the trees down from the parkways to give more area for the residents to play sports. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to adjourn to a joint meeting with the Chamber of Commerce on July 24, 1991, 7:00 p.m. in the Rains Conference Room of the Civic Center. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Wright absent). The meeting adjourned at 12:05 a.m. Respectfully submitted, ~a J. Ada~ CMC City Clerk Approved: August 7, 1991