Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/10/25 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 25, 1995 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA IlL IV. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Barker Vice Chairman McNiel __ Commissioner Lumpp Announcements Approval of Minutes July 6, 1995, Adjourned Meeting August 23, 1995, Adjourned Meeting August 23, 1995 Public Hearings Commissioner Meleher __ Commissioner Tolstoy The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-24 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES - A request to construct a 50 foot high communications monopole generally located 800 feet south of Arrow Route and more than 900 feet east of I-15 Freeway within the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 12281 Arrow Route - APN: 229-121-10. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-09 - KICKER'S GRILL - A request to expand the cafe services within an existing indoor soccer facility in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 11120 Tacoma - APN: 209-471-05. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 95-01 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Prairie Pacific Investments for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), including deviating from certain development standards, for 158 apartment units located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue - APN: 208-031-75. Associated with the application is Development Review 95-22. ENVIRONMENTAL AS SESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-22 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS - A request tO construct a 158-unit, three story senior apartment project in the High Density Residential designation (24- 30 dwelling units per acre) with a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue - APN: 208-031-75. Associated with the application is Development Agreement 95-01. Public Comments VII. VIII. This is the time andplace for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Commission Business Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11.'00 P.M adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shah be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certi~ that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 19, 1995, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. VICINITY MAP .~:E'~:E:.".~:.'::::::::::::EEEEEEEEE.::EEEE i.[ ..... Fme~ay -k CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 25, 1995 Chainnan and Members of the Plarming Commission Brad Butler, City Planner Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-24 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES - A request to construct a 50 foot high communications monopole generally located 800 feet south of Arrow Route and more than 900 feet east of I-15 Freeway within the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 12281 Arrow Rome - APN: 229-121-10. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Site Characteristics: The proposed monopole structure will be located on a 300 square foot leased site within an occupied 11.28 acre manufacturing site, see Exhibit "A." In general, the facility will be screened by other structures on the site, including poles, tanks, and buildings associated with Parallel Products, a manufacturing business conducted by the property ownei. Two 55 foot high still tanks were approved for the site on December 1, 1994. Further, although the 50 foot high pole structure may be visible from the 1-15 Freeway, at a distance of 900 feet it would be outside of the 600 foot fleeway view corridor. Facility Description: The facility is relatively small. It consists of two un-marmed radio equipment cabinets each occupying under 12 square foot of space and one freestanding 50 foot high monopole supporting six antennae units. Each antennae is approximately 4-foot in diameter. The support arms occupy approximately a 12-foot diameter air space, see Exhibits "B" and "C." Regulatory. context: Radio communications are regulated by the federal goverrkment. Communications facilities may be permitted or conditionally permitted by the local jurisdiction. The subject cellular telecommunication facility is defined in the Industrial Area Specific Plan as a "Public Safety and Utility Service." It is a conditionally permitted use on the subject site which is within Subarea 15 of~e Industrial Area Specific Plan. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 95-24 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES October 25, 1995 Page 2 ANALYSIS: General: Two issues must be addressed on the subject site: 1) there must be adequate fire safety access to the Pacific Bell leased site and 2) the property owner must maintain the entire site in conformante with the standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan regarding access, screening, and public fight-of-way dedication. The applicant has met with the Fire Safety Division and shall provide the required access. With the previous Minor Development Review 94-20 application for two 55-foot still tanks, the property owner was required to address public improvements, landscaping, screening and fire access. Staff recommends that these conditions also be applied to this project on the same site. Environmental Review: The subject application is exempt per Section 15061 of the California Environmental Quality Act. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan, the Development Code, and the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 95-24 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Information Sheet Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevation Exhibit "E" - Minor Development Review 94-20 Conditions of Approval Resolution of Approval XC} ~ INFORMATION SHEET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE NO: Conditional Use Permit 95-24 PROJECT NAME: Monopole construction APPLICANT: Pacific Bell Mobile Services LOCATION: Generally 800 feet south of Arrow Highway and approximately 900 feet east of the 1-15 Freeway at 12281 Arrow Route FLOOR AREA: Within a 300 square foot leased site LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: Heavy Industrial EXISTING ZONING: Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 15, Heavy Industrial EXISTING LAND USE: Developed, heavy manufacturing GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Heavy Industrial ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: North: South: East: ZONING Subarea 8; General Industrial Subarea 15; Heavy Industrial Subarea 15; Heavy Industrial West: Subarea 15, Heavy industrial SITE DESCRIPTION: SITE SIZE: LAND USE Vacant Vacant; Metrolink Track Vacant SCE Easement; TAMCO Mfg. Concrete Pipe Mfg. 300 square foot leased space within 11.28 acres parcel c, uP pAoIF~c bELL MOBILE .-qEIL:'VIC[~S Heavy-duly, _,9 ~ Nedlure,duty MOT ' 'T:"III~/~ n s d wooall piled from -,,, HARRISON, MTN., CALIF. NW/4 REDLAND~"N(5' QUADRANGLE 34117-B2-TP-024 1967 PHOTOREVISED 1988 Light-duly Unimproved dirt ......... O State Route II' ~ ! I I c u ~ cf r.--Z u} RANC December 1, 1994 E C I T Y 0 F HO CUCAMONG A Mr. Richard V. Eastman Parallel Products 12281 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 , Dear Mr. Eastman: ..... /' The Minor Development Review process for the above-described application has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during the review process. Findings 1. The proposed project is consistent wi~h the General Plan. The proposed project is in accordance with the objectives of the Indusu'ial Specific Plan, and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be delftmental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed p. wject, together with the conditions of approval, will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan, Development Code and all other applicable City's Ordinances and Policies. Conditions This project is approved subject to the following conditions: Planning Division: The approval is for the installation of two ~11 tanks not to exceed 55 feet, and a six feet high decorative block wall along the west property line from the landscape setback to the south property line. Mayor Dennis L. Stout Mayor Pro-Tern Charle! J, Buquet II Councilmember William J. Alexander Councilmember Oiane Willjams Councilmember Rex Gutierrez (909) 989-1851 FAX 909} ?87.6499 Mr. Richard V. Eastman MDR 94-20 December 1, 1994 Page 2 This approval .shall expire, unless extended by the City Planner, if building permits are not issued'within 12 months from the date of approval. The first 20 feet (plus or minus) of block wall at the west property line and the north facing re.ram block wall shall match the design, color and material of the screen wall at the westerly adjadent property. Detailed plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance to building permits. Any modification to the landscaping within the Arrow Route setback area shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to commencement of work. Approval of this application shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Prior to using the two still tanks, all conditions of approval shall be completed to the: satisfaction of the City Planner. Engineering Division: An irrevocable offer to dedicate a total of 50 feet of right_of, way on Arrow Route shall be processed prior to issuance of building permits. A signed consent and waiver to join the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits.. uilding and Safety Division - Fir~ safety/New Construction Unit: 1. The two stx~l tanks ~ for Class I Flammable Lil:ll~d producu~on. The process shall use ~uipment peci~cally listed for its intended app ic tion inclu hag but are not limited to 4. p ssure vessels, heating equipment, electrical emergency relief valves, emergency shut do rating of the electrical equipment in a hazardous environment per the National Electn Codes. Detailed plans shall be subrr~tted for Building O~cial review and approval prior to a uancc ofany permits. Inspections o the improvements for codes compliance shall be required prior to using the The applicant shal oreply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanica} Code, Uui Pl.u~bi~.g Code, National. Slecm.'c Code, and all o. ther applicable of lS' 6", and shall be identified on site. Mr. _Richard V. Eastman MDR 94-20 December 1, 1994 Page 3 E~ergency driveway access shall be controlled with a knox access system as approved by the Fire Protection District. 6. All indus~al uses at the Fire access point shall be identified to indicate hazard. : on-site grading/drainage plan shall be submitted for review to ensure proper ,l for spillage and runoff. ]q'~S'/l~-'7'h 1. aest for the installation of the two still tanks shall be submitted for Fire approval prior to issuance of building permits. The facilit} respect to Fire Marshal r substandard and not in compliance with the current Fire Codes with and access roadways. The applicant shah submit detailed plans for prior to any further site Lmpmvements. The use of existing review and appwval prior to , wine storage to 200 proof alcohol storage must be reviewed plans shall be submitted for Fire Marshal Secondary containment for site must be identified. Detailed approval prior to issuance of building releases of ~ammable/combustible liquids on the shall be submitted for Fir~ Marshal review and Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits, This decision shall be final following a ten-day appeal period beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the Pla.,ming Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $62 appeal fee. If you have any questions, pleas~ feel free to contact Nancy Fong at (909) 989-1861. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PL G D SI BB:NF:mlg cc: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer John Thomas, Principal Plans Examiner Ralph Crane, Deputy Fire Marshal R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT January 18, 1995 Mr. Richard V. Eastman Parallel Products 12281 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Dear Mr. Eastman: The following conditions are revisions to the previous 12/1/94 letter regarding Minor Development Review 94-20. These conditions supersede the previous conditions for "Building and Safety Division-Fire Safety/New Construction Unit" and "Fire Protection District". These conditions are intended to clarify and eliminate duplication apparent in the previous conditions. Building and Safety Division - Fire Safety/New Construction Unit The distillate columns are intended for production of Class I flammable liquids. The process equipment shall be listed for its intended purpose, including but not limited to. pressure vessels. heating equipment. electrical emergency relief valves. emergency shut down, rating of the electrical equipment in a hazardous environment. per National Electrical Codes. Detailed plans shall be submitted for Building Official review and approval prior to Issuance of any building permits. All improvements shall be inspected for compliance with appropriate codes prior to Using the distillate columns. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Bufiding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code. Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electrical Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of the issuance of permits. Fire Safety Division A District 'Change Request' shall be submitted for the installation of the proposed vaulted aboveground 2000 gallon gasoline storage tank. The Change Request shall be submitted for Fire Marshal review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The facility is currently substandard and not in compliance with the current adopted Uniform Fire Code. with respect to fire department access and on ADMINISTRATION · P O BOX 850 · RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA g'l/Ofi0850 · (909] 9~.7-2535 · FAX [909] 987-0887 F:.QE S,~FET"/· PO BOX 807 · RANCHO CUCAMOf':G.t~. CA ~'1729-0807 · (909] 987 ~.:05 · FAX [90¢')987-6499 Parallel Products January 18, 1995 Page Two site water supply. (fire hydrants). The applicant shall submit detailed plans/reports by a professional engineer for Fire Marshal review and approval of compliance with Chapter 10 of the Uniform Fire Code, prior to issuance of bufidLng permits. The use of existing tanks must be reviewed for structural and fire safety compliance. The applicant shall submit detailed plans/reports by a professiQnal engineer for Fire Marshal review and approval of compliance with Chapter 10 of the Uniform Fire Code, prior to issuance of building permits. Secondary containment for unauthorized releases of ~ammable/ combustible liquids on site must be identified. The applicant shall submit detafied plans/reports by a professional engineer for Fire Marshal review and approval of compliance with Chapter 10 of the Uniform Fire Code, prior to issuance of building permits. Provide a directory at the primary fire department access. The directory shall filustrate the on site hazards to responding emergency personnel. Submit directory filustration to Fire Marshal for review and approval prior to installation. Sincerely, Fire Marshal Sr. Plans Examiner c: Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-24 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 15), OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-121-10. A. Recitals. 1. Pacific Bell Mobile 8errices has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-24, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of October 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined. and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals, Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on October 25, 1995, including wdtten and oral staff repods, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 6pplication applies to properly located at 12281 Arrow Route with a street frontage of 413.06 feet and lot depth of approximately 2,300 feet and is presently improved with buildings and tanks; and b. The properly to the nodh of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south consists Of vacant parcels and the Metrolink track. the properly to the east is a vacant Southern California Edison utility easement and the properly to the west is a developed manufacturing site; and c. The application is for a 300 square foot leased space within a 11.28 acre developed -industrial site more than 900 feet from the 1-15 Freeway. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-24 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES October 25, 1995 Page 2 b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to propedies or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Division 1 ) This approval is for the installation of a 50 foot high telecommunications monopole and two un-manned radio equipment cabinets. 2) This approval shall expire, unless extended by the City Planner, if building permits are not issued within 24 months from the date of approval. 3) The screen wall requirement placed on Minor Development Review 94- 20 is also placed on this application and shall be completed prior to completion of these facilities. A screen wall shall be constructed along the west property line. The first 20 feet (plus or minus) of block wall at the west property line and the north facing return block wall shall match the design. color, and material of the screen wall at the westerly adjacent properly. Detailed plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits and construction completed prior to completion of these facilities to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4) The Arrow Route landscape requirement placed on Minor Development Review 94-20 is also placed on this application and shall be completed prior to completion of these facilities. Irrigated landscaping shall be installed along Arrow Route. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the commencement of work and installation shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) Access ~hall be provided on-site for construction and maintenance of the subject facility. Prior to issuance of building permits, verification of access shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner and the Fire District. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-24 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES October 25, 1995 Page 3 6) Approval of this application shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Enqineering Division 1) The right-of-way requirement placed on Minor Development Review 94- 20 is also placed on this application. An irrevocable offer to dedicate a total of 50 feet of right-of-way on Arrow Route shall be processed prior to issuance of building permits. 2) The Landscape and Lighting Distdct requirement placed on Minor Development Review 94-20 is also placed on this application. A signed consent and waiver to join the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior (o issuance of building permits. Buildinc~ and Safety Division - Fire Safety/New Construction 1) The fire lane requirement placed on Minor Development Review 94-20 is also placed on this application. All fire lanes shall be a minimum of 26 feet in width with a height clearance of 18 feet 6 inches, and shall be identified on site to the satisfaction of the Building Official. 2) Fire lane access to this facility shall be provided prior to the issuance of Building Permits to the satisfaction of the Building Official. 3) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. Fire Protection District 1) The fire protection requirement placed on Minor Development Review 94-20 is also placed on this application. The facility at 12281 Arrow Route is currently substandard and not in compliance with the current Fire Codes with respect to fire hydrants and access roadways. The applicant or owner shall submit detailed plans for Fire Marshall review and approval prior to any further site improvements, 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, CUP 95-24 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES October 25, 1995 Page 4 BY: E. David Barker, Chairman A'I'rEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of October 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: P-ZlFCO Produds RECEIVED 10/20/95 OCT 2 5 1995 City of Rar~cho Cucamonga PLanning Division TO: City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, Ca., 91730 Gentlemen: It has come to our attention that US Indoor Soccer Academy is planning to sell alcoholic beverages on their premises. We strenuously oppose the selling of alcohoic beverages on these premises due to our past experiences with the customers who frequent that business. Unfortunately, U.S. Indoor Soccer management excerise little or no contol over the conduct of the individuals who visit and particiate in games at that location. The use of alcohol at this location can only increase the already problema~situations that occur almost on a daily basis. RAF/gp 8560 Oakwood PI. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 466-3809 FAX (909) 466-3811 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF RF, PORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 25, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-09 - KICKER'S GRILL - A request to expand the cafe services within an existing indoor soccer facility in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 11120 Tacoma - APN: 209-471-05. BACKGROUND: On April 24, 1994, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 94-09 for the operation of an indoor soccer facility. Plans for the facility included two soccer fields, locker rooms, a pro shop, an arcade, and a care area. Because the parking standards of the Development Code do not address this type of use, the applicant provided an analysis of the parking demand based on a similar facility in Orange County. Given the number of players, employees, and potential visitors, the applicant estimated that 67 parking spaces would be necessary to accommodate the business. The cafe was originally designed to provide a %vaiting area" for parents of children participating in the soccer leagues. The cafe would serve cold sandwiches, snacks, and beverages. The cafe area was considered an ancillary use to the main business. Additional parking was not required for the cafe. ANALYSIS: General: Because of the success of the facility, the applicant is considering an expansion of the care services offered. The applicant is proposing to provide a grill for hot foods and to serve beer and wine, These new services would be provided within the existing cafe area, the size of the care will not be expanded. The applicant believes the expansion will provide a better social environment for the families using the facility (see Exhibit "A"). Compatibility: The parking calculations prepared for the original approval anticipated a 'Mzorse case scenario" wherein each employee and each player would drive their own vehicle to the site. This would require 56 parking stalls. A 20 percent contingency factor was considered as a "cushion," bringing the 'required parking to 67. Given that 69 spaces exist on-site. parking was not viewed as a problem for the facility. Upon the facility's opening, the applicant experienced a parking problem with an influx of cam arriving at one time. This was attributed to both soccer games starting at the same time. To provide a smoother flow of players into and out of the facility, the schedule was revised to have one game start on the hour and the other game start on the half-hour. This helped to eliminate the parking problem at peak times and spread the parking distribution more evenly. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 94-09 - KICKER'S GRILL October 25, 1995 Page 2 Even with these changes, however, parking became an issue for adjoining tenants. While there seemed to be ample parking spaces available, many soccer patrons elected to park in the closest parking spaces which, in many cases, was property owned by adjacent businesses, or illegally park on the street. The developer of the center striped the parking area to designate the limits of the soccer facility parking. This did not correct the problem. The property owner to the west had posts installed at his drive aisle and put a chain across the drive aisle to discourage soccer patrons from parking in his facility. After roughly one week, the chain was removed from the drive aisle by unknown individuals. The property owner has since resorted to posting the site for no parking after business hours and hiring a towing firm to police the site. The towing firm has, in fact, towed vehicles from the premises. Even with the correction of existing problems, the addition of a grill and beer and wine sales does raise further questions about the parking availability. The parking analysis prepared for the original application assumed patrons of the soccer facility would enter the facility just before game time and exit the facility shortly after the game completion. The care was intended to provide a "rest area for parents while their children are playing" (see Exhibit "E"). Staff has visited the facility on several occasions and finds the current parking adequate to meet the facility's needs. On each site visit, there have been parking spaces available at the rear of the site. The applicant states the introduction of the grill and beer and wine is targeted at patrons who already remain at the facility for many hours. This may exacerbate the parking problem for the soccer facility and adjoining properties. CORRESPONDENCE: In accordance with State and City requirements, the application request has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the site was posted, and notices were mailed to all properties within 300 feet of the subject site. In response to the notification, staff has received one letter in opposition to the request (see Exhibit "F"). RECOMMENDATION: Given the problems resulting from the soccer facility and the potential for future conflicts, staff recommends the Planning Commission not approve any expansion of the use until the applicant can demonstrate for a reasonable period of time that adequate provisions are in-place to eliminate impacts on adjoining properties. Therefore, staff recommends denial of the application without prejudice through adoption of the attached Resolution Denial. BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - EXhibit "C" - EXhibit "D" - EXhibit "E" - EXhibit "F" - Resolution of Denial Letters from Applicant Location Map Site Plan Floor Plan Original Parking Analysis Letter from Adjacent Property Owner THE CI'P( OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Ddve P,O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 August 21, 1995 Re: Permit for tenant improvement and addition We the owners of Kickers Gdll have been working with the owners of the US Indoor Soccer Academy located at 11120 Tacoma Ddve in city of Rancho Cucamonga to improve the Cafeteria section of the facility by offering an expanded menu to cater to the demanding needs of the members and the clientele. Because SOCCER, like other sporting event bdngs the athletes and fans together to form a club which is a social outing for many families. Most of these families come and spend many hours in the facility (many hungry hours !) playing, watching and enjoying time with each other. In the past year that the facility has been open, many of its members have traveled distances as far away as Los Angeles and Palm Spdngs to play a game at this center. These members as well as the people who live closer just don't have time to prepare a cooked meal because they come to the facility straight after work. In order to accommodate the needs of the members and the visitors we have been negotiating with the US Indoor Soccer Academy to provide food service and improve the atmosphere of the Cafeteria section by providing hot and cold sandwiches and ddnks. Sincerely; Cle Kooiman Kickers Grill THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Ddve P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 August 30, 1995 Re: Safety rules and requlations for the Cafeteria servincl bear and wine. The Cafeteria will be managed by George Franov who has over 10 years of experience in food business and will have a trained manager on sight at all times. In addition we will. a) Send all employees to classes offered by the Health Department and Alcohol and Beverage department, b) Only bear and wine will be served to create a atmosphere of a Pizza place and NOT a bar. c) Rules have been set up in cooperation with US Indoor Soccer Academy and will be enforced. In addition, Kickers will be operating by 3 partners who have been coaching soccer for 45 combined years and are committed to preserve a healthy family environment that members could be comfortable in. Sincerely; Cle Kooiman Kickers Gdll Location Map 0.18 JFRSF-Y ,Im~ 0 0.18 0.36 Miles N S ~6~5 ~ rf Petrossi & Associates Architecture, Planning, Interiors February 7, 1994 Mr. Brad Bullard Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Bullard, -- RECEIVED -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9LANNING DIVISION FEB 0 8 1994 Per our telephone conversation regarding parking, Please find following parking study: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Indoor Soccer is played with six (6) player on each si~e. An average team will have Twelve (12) registered players. There are two (2) indoor soccer fields. Two (2) Teams play on each field every hour. Total of four (4) teams will be playing at any given time. There will be forty eight (48) players every hour. Eighty (80) percent of players are below the age of 12. Parents will be driving players to the center. Players usually drive together or witl~ some parents to the center. For every two players there is only one car needed. So for forty eight (48) players, twenty four (24) car is needed. There is also an overlap of players in the center. For The Forty eight (48) additional players during the overlap period an additional 24 cars are needed. At any given time 48 parking spaces are required for players. There will be eight (8) full time staff on site at any given time. Therefore (48 players + 8 staff) = 56 parking spaces are required. 20% contingency must also be allocated for additional parking spaces, this is 11 additional parking spaces. The Total parking requirement will therefore be 56 + 11 = 67 spaces. The center has currently 70 parking spaces which is more than adequate for the traffic that the center generates. The cafeteria is actually a rest area for the parents while their children are playing. The cafeteria will only be serving cold drinks as well as snacks. It is not a restaurant. Please find attached copy of cup for similar project in City Of Irvine. Should you have any question please call me at any time. Sincerely Yours, 2082 S.E. Bristol, S, itc 221 · Santo A?~a Heights, CA 92707 · Tel: (71.~) 833 32.~0 · Fr~x: (714) 833-1145 Mold And Die October 12, 1995 Scott Murphy City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Liquor License for U.S. Indoor Soccer Dear Mr. Murphy: I am writing this letter as a concerned neighbor of U.S. Indoor Soccer. I believe it would be a grave mistake to grant U.S. Indoor Soccer a liquor license, based on the problems that currently exist with this establishment. The nature of their business does not even warrant a reason for liquor. The patrons are either young teenage kids that can not drink legally or adults that are interested in the health and fun of playing organized sports. Next, Hitter's Haven will want a liquor license. How many sports have a beer break at halftime or at the end of a period? With the right to sell liquor, U.S. Indoor Soccer would create a higher level of loitering than it has now. Mixing loitering with liquor can only fuel the already apparent problems between U.S. Indoor Soccer and the rest of the property owners in the Arrow Business Park. · As a local business owner, understanding Rancho Cucamonga's regard to provide a high standard of living for its people, I hope you give this matter a great deal of consideration. Thank-you, Mike Koebel ~"-10824 Edison Court · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3868 · (909) 980-6600 · FAX (909) 944-3199 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERM!T NO. 94-09, A REQUEST TO EXPAND THE CAFE SERVICES WITHIN AN EXISTING SOCCER FACILITY IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 11200 TACOMA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-471-05. A.' Recitals. 1. Cle Kooiman has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 94-09, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of October 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined. and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headrig on October 25, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 11200 Tacoma with a street frontage of 204 feet and lot depth of 296 feet and is presently improved with an industrial building; and b. The properties to the north and south of the subject site are designated for industrial uses and are vacant. The properties to the east and west are designated for industrial uses and are developed with industrial buildings; and c. The business activity currently creates parking problems on adjacent properties; and d. Expansion of the use may create additional impacts on the adjacent properties as a result of slower turnover rates, inconsistent with the intent of the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vioinity. II PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 94-09 - CLE KOOIMAN October 25 1995 Page 2 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application without prejudice. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman A'I't'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of October 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 25, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 95-01 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Prairie Pacific Investments for the purpose of providing a senior housing project in accordance with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), including deviating from certain development standards, for 158 apartment units located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue - APN: 208-031-75. Associated with the application is Development Review 95-22. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-22 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS - A request to construct a 158-unit, three story senior apartment project in the High Density Residential designation (24-30 dwelling units per acre) with a Senior Housing Overlay Distdct (SHOD), located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue - APN: 208-031-75. Associated with the application is Development Agreement 95-01. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 32.6 dwelling units per acre. Surrounding Land Use and ZonincE North - Shopping center; Neighborhood Commercial South o Single family residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East Shopping center; Neighborhood Commercial West Single family residential; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) General Plan Desianations: Project Site - High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East Neighborhood Commercial West Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Site Characteristics: Two building pads have been rough graded in the central portion of the site. Street improvements were installed by the City as part of the Base Line Road widening project several years ago. The site drops roughly 8 feet from Base Line Road to the first ITEMS C& D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA 95-01 & DR 95-22 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC October 25, 1995 Page 2 building pad. The entire site falls approximately 20 feet from Base Line Road to the south property boundary. The grades along the west property line are within a couple feet of the existing grades for the single family residences, E. Parkina Calculations: Number of Number of Type Number of Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Units Ratio Required Provided Senior Apartments 158 0.7 spaces/unit 111 158 ANALYSIS: Backaround: In 1988, the City approved a General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment to change the designation on the site from Low Residential to High Residential, Senior Housing Overlay District. In conjunction with the application, the City also approved a Development Review application and a Development Agreement for a 177-unit senior apartment project. The three-story project was designed as two "U-shaped" buildings around a central courtyard area. Parking for the project was provided around the perimeter of the site. Access to the site was available from Base Line Road. Emergency access was provided by a gate along the west side of the Rancho Cucamonga Library site. General: The applicant is proposing a senior apartment project similar to the project previously approved by the City. The north and south buildings will be three stories and designed in a "U" shape around common recreational amenities, There will be a two-story recreation building on the west side ofthe site separating the three-story structures. Parking is provided around the perimeter of the site. The number of dwelling units has been reduced from 177 to the current proposal of 158 rental units plus a caretakers unit. The one and two bedroom units will be 533 and 839 square feet in area, respectively. C, Development Agreement: In conjunction with the application, the applicant has submitted an application for a Development Agreement. A Development Agreement is a requirement of any Senior Housing project in order to lock in the rental rates, tenant qualification criteria, and the term of the affordability. The Development Agreement also affirms the density bonus allowed for the affordable housing and the reduced parking ratio (0.7 parking spaces per unit) allowed by the Senior Housing Overlay District. In addition, the applicant is also requesting a Development Agreement to address deviations from the Development Code requirements. Under normal circumstances, these deviations would be processed as Variance applications. The Development Agreement, however, allows the City and the developer to enter into a contract to allow the deviations from the Code as an incentive to foster affordable housing. State law requires that the units remain affordable for at least 30 years. Under State law, Development Agreements must be approved by the City Council. Because of the Code deviations requested by the applicant, staff felt the Planning Commission should consider these requests and forward comments, where applicable, to the City Council for their consideration. The deviations include the following: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA 95-01 & DR 95-22 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC October 25, 1995 Page 3 D= The maximum building height within 100 feet of single family residential shall be limited to single story. The applicant is proposing an 81-foot setback to the three-story structure. Private open space shall be provided at a rate of 150 square feet for ground floor units and 100 square feet for the second and third floor units. The applicant is proposing patios/balconies as small as 100 square feet for the ground floor units and 95 square feet for upper units. The minimum one-bedroom unit size is 650 square feet. The applicant is proposing a 533 square foot one-bedroom unit with the application. Laundry facilities shall be provided at a rate of one washer and dryer for every 5 units. The applicant is proposing one washer and dryer for every 14 units. Projects consisting of 101 to 200 dwelling units shall provide five different recreational amenities: The applicant is proposing five amenities but some are duplications. The minimum building setback from the drive aisle is 20 feet. In some locations, the proposed setback is 9 feet. The ratio of parking spaces required is 1.5 spaces per 1 bedroom unit and 1.8 spaces per 2 bedroom unit. The applicant is proposing 0.7 Spaces per unit consistent with all other SHOD projects. Staff has reviewed the items requested by the applicant. Many of these items are consistent with the previous senior apartment project's approval for the site. The other issues, including the washer/dryer ratio, number of recreational amenities. and building setback from the drive aisle, are a result of the multi-family standards adopted by the City in 1991. Again, these items are consistent with the previous application and are not viewed as significant. Desion Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Melcher, Fong) reviewed the application on September 19, 1995, and recommended approval of the application as submitted by the applicant. Neighborhood Meetina: In anticipation of the Development Review process, the applicant already conducted a neighborhood meeting to enlist concerns from the adjacent property owners. On August 29, 1995, several of the property owners attended the meeting. The main concerns of the attendees were as follows: The previous developer of the site removed the rear wall of the neighboring properties, leaving the homes exposed to the subject site. The owners were very concerned about the safety of their homes and requested assurances from the developer that the perimeter wall would be constructed prior to construction of the buildings. The applicant indicated that the wall would be the first thing constructed if the project went forward. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA 95-01 & DR 95-22 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC October 25, 1995 Page 4 The residents did not want trash enclosures located adjacent to their lots. They were concerned about the smell, flies, etc. emanating from the enclosures being so close to their property. The applicant has not relocated the enclosures. Tall evergreen trees should be provided along the west property line to provide buffering and privacy for the single family homes. This is a condition of approval. Initially, a few of the homeowners expressed concern about the impact three-story structures would have on their pdvacy and views. By the end of the meeting, the height of the structures did not seem to be a major issue. The wall construction and landscape installation seemed to address most of the concern. Environmental Assessment: Staff has reviewed the application and determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Senior apartments generate fewer vehicle trips than conventional residential development. Also, the close proximity to shopping opportunities will further reduce any traffic impacts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward any comments regarding the Development Agreement to the City Council, approve Development Review 95-22 through adoption of the attached Resolution, and issue a Negative Declaration for the project. Respe( '~ .Fad~u.eF City Planner BB:SM/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Illustrative Site Section Exhibit "G" - Floor Plans Draft Development Agreement (to be provided under separate cover) Resolution of Approval Senior Apartments I'RAIRIE PACIFIC INVESIMENIS Site [Jlilizadon Map 7201 Haven Ave. Suite E-347 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 (909) 989-5098 Rar~cho Cucamonga Public Ljbrary Senior Apartments PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS 1201 Haven Ave. Suite E-341 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 Vicinity Map -'-i,, ~ ~ '-- '- U lll I..! .J FI'~TF'I'I'I'Ffi'I'r'FI I'1 (909) 989-5098 I Detailed Site Plan J Existing Single Family Residential ' D PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS Existing Commercial Center Conceptual Landscape Plan 7201 Haven Ave. Suite E-347 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 (909) '989-5098 L l ~>l Sen~br,, PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS 7201 Haven Ave. Suite E-347 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 (909) 989-5098 Conceptual Grading Plan J Senior Apartments PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS 7201 Haven Ave. Suite E-347 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 (909) 989-5098 Conceptual Grading l>lan ,, ........................ .................... :' :" ' 7':' ? ': ~' 2 ':~:~:"'::::~' :: :': '2C:*: ~.?:' i !::: ":* .., North, South Similar ' I ....-....- Senior Apartments PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS 7201 Haven Ave. Suite E-347'Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 (909) 989-5098 East Elevations Senior Apartments PRAIRIE PACIFIC fNVESIMENIS ' North, South Similar West 7335 Klusman Partial Site Section North Building ~ Senior Apartments · "h" PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS 7201 Haven Ave. Suite E-347 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 (909) 989-5098 South Building North Building ,ing Unit B 2 Bdrm, 2 Bth ~), Bath 839 sq. ~. ~ Unit A I Bdrm, I Bth 533 sq. ~. Senior Apartments PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS 7201 Haven Ave. Suite E-347 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91701 (909) 989-5098 Floor Plans RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 95-22, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 158-UNIT. THREE- STORY SENIOR APARTMENT PROJECT IN THE HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (24-30 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-031-75. A. Recitals. 1. Praide Pacific Investments, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 95-22 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of October 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on October 25, 1995, including written and oral staff repods, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of 328 feet and lot depth of 645 feet and is presently rough graded; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a shopping center. The property to the south consists of a single family residence and is designated for residential development. The property to the east is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a shopping center. The property to the west is designated for residential development and is developed with single family residences; and c. The development of 158 affordable senior apartments on 4.85 acres, in conjunction with the Development Agreement, is consistent with the High Density Residential designation and the Senior Housing Overlay District of the Development Code and the High Density Residential designation of the General Plan; d. The project, in conjunction with the Development Agreement, will comply with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 95-22 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC October 25, 1995 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, furlher, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Furlher, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3. and 4 above, this Commission heraby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions. attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Plannina Division 1) Approval of Development Review 95-22 is contingent upon approval of Development Agreement 95-01. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 95-22 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC October 25, 1995 Page 3 2) The block wall along the property boundary shall be constructed prior to commencement of the building construction. 3) Evergreen columnar trees shall be planted along the south and west property lines to provide screening and buffering between the project and the single family homes. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. Enoineering Division 1) Any missing street improvements along Base Line Road, per Drawing No. 1168, shall be installed upon development. It will be necessary to recheck the plans for conformance to current City standards, since more than one year has elapsed since their approval. 2) Remove the westerly portion of the existing drive approach at the east properly boundary, which provides access to adjacent development to the east, and reconstruct as follows: a) Make a good faith effod to obtain permission from the adjacent properly to the east to enter onto their property for removal of a portion of their perimeter fencing. If permission is granted, reconstruct the drive approach to result in the west side being approximately 3 feet west of the property line and construct asphalt on-site to provide proper join. b) If permission is not granted, reconstruct the drive approach to match the existing aisle width on-site. c) In either case, curve the curb adjacent sidewalk to cross the reconstructed approach south of the zero curb face. 3) Submit a drainage study and install facilities as determined by the City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1995. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 95-22 - PRAIRIE PACIFIC October 25, 1995 Page 4 ATTEST: Brad Buffer, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of October 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: /--'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'~? APPLICANT: Those items chewed are Cond~ions of ~provaL APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (909) 989'1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. TIme LImits Y/ 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not co mmenced within 24 months from the date of approval. v/ 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to ! ! , 3. Approval of Tc nt.a~ No. ~-2Z, is granted subject to the approval of The developer sha II commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Melio-Roos Comrnunify Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the devebpment. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be iormed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. so- ~o/94 Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance ol necessary school facfiities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the aMernative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordatlon of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. FuMher, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recoretatlon of the .final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Completion Date __/ / __J / __J / __J / __/ / v/ This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected .school districts have entered inlo an agreeme nt to privately accommodate any and all school ~mpacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prio rto issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. __J / B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Specific Plan and Planned Community. v/ 2. Prior to any use of the pzroject site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. ,/ ,/ Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. ___J / 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be .___/ / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. J / All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency priorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal. encroachment, building. etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development .__/ / Code, all olher applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and .--/ / Sheriff's Department (989-6611) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacenl properlies. v/ sc- ~o/~ 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units __J / with all receptacles shielded from public view. J / Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls. berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City ,an.er. 2 ,/ 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with J / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map, __/ / 12. All building numbers and .individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option ol keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. _J / .__/ / 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. __J / - 16. Allparkways, open areas,and landscapingshall bepermanentlymaintained bytheproperty owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ._J / 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordatidn of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. __J / 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, de molitidn, relocaticn, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a rnodificatidn to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation CommissiOn review and approval. __J / C. Building Design sc- 1o/~ An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All dwellings sha# have the fronl, side and rear elevations upgraded with amhitectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. / / __/ / v' 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. AII roof aPPurtenances, including airconditioners and otherroof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffe red from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans) t'/ 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including cur'o). V ,/ Textured pedestrian pathways and texlured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles. entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restdct the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancbe Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) 1. A detailed andscape and irrigation plan. including slope planting and model home landscap- ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. v/ 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the ar13orist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods. / A minimum of ,5"~ trees pergross acre, comprised of the following sizes. shall be provided within the project: /~ %-48-inchbexorlarger,/~ % - 36- inch bex or larger, /~ % - 24- inch box or larger, ?~) %-15-gallon, and ~'-- %-5gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree tor every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. CornDiction Date: .__/ / .__/ / ,__/ / __/ / / / / .__/ / .__/ / .__/ / .__/ / SC-10/94 ,/ ,/ / / sc- 1o/94 6. Treesshallbeplarfledinareasotpublicviewadjacenttoandalongstructuresatarateofone tree per 30 linear feet of building. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vedical he ight and of 5:1 o r g reate r slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. AII private slopes in excessof5feet, but lessthan8 feet invedical height andof2:l orgreater slope shall be landscaped and irdgated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or laFger size tree per each 250 sq. ~. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condillon by the developer until each individual unit is soldandoccupiedbythebuyer. Prlortoreleasingoccupancyforthoseunlts, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept tree from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways. walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and inlensified landscaping, is required along 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative t re atment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria Shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteda shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. / / __/ / __/ / ___/ / __/ / / / __/ / __/ / J / J / ._J / F. Signs / 1. Thesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartofthisapproval. ..__/ / Any signs proposed for this development s. hall comply-with the Sign Ordinance and shall r.equire separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. AUniformSignProgramforthisdevelopmentshallbesubmittedforCityplanner reviewand .__/ / approval prior to issuance of building permits. J / 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separale application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building pen'nits. G. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wr'fften notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuationto below45CNEL, thebuildingmatedalsand ccnstructiontechniquesprovided, and it appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for ccnformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v/ 1. EmergenoysecondaryaccessshallbeprovldedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire Protection District Standards. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimu m of 26 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Ranoho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance of building permits for Combustible ConstnJctldn, evidence shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending Completion of required fire protection system. The applicant shall Contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. v/ 2. v/' 3. v/ 4. __/ / __/ / ._/ / ~ / ._J / ~ / ._./ / _._/ / sc- 1o/94 For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Heallh and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 6 APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOR ;OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: i. Site Development v/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code. and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. v/ Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include. but are not limited to: City Beautificaticn Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development lees at the established rate. Such lees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Streetaddressessha~~beprcvidedbytheBuilding~~~cia~~aftertract/parce~maprec~rdati~n and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the properly line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with corred building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. v/ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for building permit application. K. Grading ' 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards. and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pedorm such work. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance Permit is required. Please contact San Bemardino County Depadment of Agricuifu re at (714) 387-2111 for permit applicatlon. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. SC-10/94 4. A geological repod shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologisl and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 7 .._g / .~/ / J / __/ / __/ / J / __/ / __/ / J / / / J / __J / ._/ / 6. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteetrig completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-sile drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel .that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building porrnit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of bu tiding and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) Completion Date: __/ / __J / __/ / __/ / e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses .--/ / or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other aiternalive method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 I of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, ---J / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as showit on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, locgl feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the purlmater streets ---/ / (measured from street centedine): total feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made -.-J / for all private streets or ddves. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: .__/ / 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs ._._/ / or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pdor to the issuance of building ben'nits, where no map is involved. sc- ~o/94 6. Private drainage easements forcross*lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-toot minimum building restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and Contain the following language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees plaCed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private properly. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effoM to acquire the required off°site pmperty interests necessary to COnstruct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to COmplete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 atsuchtimeastheCityacquiresthepropenyinterestsrequiredlortheimprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all COsts incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connectlon with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these COsts shall be in the form ol a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer. at developers COst. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails. paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be COnstructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, Curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be COnstructed for all haft-section streets. 3. ConStruct the following perimeter street improvements including. but not limited to: Completion __/__/ __/ / J / J / .__/ / .,_J / _.J / __/ / STREET NAME CURB & A,C. SDE- ORIVE STREET SmEET COMM MEDIAN BIKE GUTTER PVMT WALK APP~. LIGHTS TREES TRAIL ISLANO TRAIL OTHER (e) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) It so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per S D. 304. (d) If so marked an in-lieu of construction tee shall v' ¢, 4. Improvement plans and construction: Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and appmved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed Io the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, priorto final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b= Prior to any work being pedormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer; Notes: (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to lhe satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design 'shall be as specified by the City Engineer. i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by Ihe City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shill be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. J / __J / J / .__/ / J / J / .__/ / _,_/ / J / J / _._/ / C_.,O sc- lo/94 10 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersectionS, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained Item CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: .__/ / J J__ _J / __J / 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the ---/ / issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval pdor to final map approval or issuance el building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: / / v/ 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be fi led with the City Engineer pdor to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the developer. J / 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the -.-J / developer until accepted by the City. __J / 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: O, Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or pertions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The deveioper's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Sc - 10/94 11 / / ___/ / 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities v/ 1 .Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Comvletlon Date: ._J / ._J / / / /J / / Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: / / / / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance it no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: /.___J / / / / 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcemonl Community Facilities District shall be liled with the City Engineer prior to tinal map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to tinalizalion of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be. com- pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of lhe City Engineer. Phase poundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved lentalive map. / / / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 987-6405, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. sc- 10/94 12 -" .__/ / v' / / 2. Fire flow requirement shall be gallons per minute. A previous fire flow, conducted gpm available at 20 psi. revealed A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed ----// and operable priorto delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i .e., lu tuber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4.Existingfirehydrantldcati~nssha~~bepr~~idedpri~rt~waterp~anappr~va~.Requiredhydrants~ J / if any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specitloatlons on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible constn~ctlon,evidence shall be ---/ / submitted to the Fire Distdct that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to ---/ / final inspection. /J An aulomatlo fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: v/Per Rancho Cucamanga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. ,/ Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodwo rking, plastics manufacuring, spray painting, fiammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact Fire Safety Division to determine'if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion --J / of sprinkler system. _._/ / 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: v/Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. ~'/California Code Regulations Title 24. NFPA 101. v/Other/5;~/~',~/~',~',~' 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdct's fire lane standards, as noted: ~*/'AII madways. Other __/ / 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. ---/ / v/ 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards.. ---/ / 13. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide -J / at all times during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. V'/ 14. All trees planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so ~ / as not to impede fire apparatus. v/ .15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: ---J / v/Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. ,/ Other 16, A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 17. Gated/restricted entry(s) requ ire installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. J / __J / 18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. ---/ / havebeenpaid. , shall be paid: Prior to water plan approval. v/Prior to final plan approval. Note: Sepa rate plan check fees for fire protection syslems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 20. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: .__/ / A. ' General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. Storage of readily combustible material. Places of assen'~ly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations) D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing. E. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin). F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet. G. Garages Motor vehicle repair (H-4) SC-10/94 Lumber yards (over 100,000 board feet). 14 · I. Tire rebuilding plants. J. Auto wrecking yards. Junk or waste material handling plants. K. Flammable finishes. Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanIs, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder coating and organic peroxides and dual com- ponent coatings (per spray booth). L. Magnesium (more tha 10 pounds per day). M. Oil burning equipment operations. N. Ovens (industrial baking and drying). O. Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounts of refrigerant). P. Compressed gases (store, handle or use exceeding 100 cubic feet). Q. Cryogenic fluids (storage, handling or use). R. Dust-producing processes and equipment. S. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage, handling or use). T. High piled combustible stock. U. Liguified petroleum gas (store, handle, transport or use more than 120 gallons). V. Matches (more than 60 Matchman's gross). W. Welding and cutting operations: to conduct welding and/or Cuffing operations in any occupancy. sc- ~0/94 Senior Apartments T H E C I T Y 0 F ANCI-IO CUCA~ONC, PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS PETER J. PITASSI, AIA A R C H I T E C T October 25, 1995 Dear Co~issioner: ' · han~ you ~n advance £or your consideration and support. r . IA PJP:cas Enclosures 8439 WHITE OAK AVE STE 405 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 9'1730 TEL (909I 980-t364 FAX [909) 944-58'14 158 City: Owner: Developer: contract Builder: construction Management: construction Controller: Architect: civil Engineering: construction Financing: PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TEAM LIST October 1, 1995 VILLA PACIFICA Unit, Seniors Affordable Housing Complex (55 and over) Baseline Road, Southwest of Archibald Rancho cucemonga Re-Development Agency Olen C. Jones 10500 Center Street TL: {909) 989-1851 Rancho Cucamonga, CA FX: (909) 948-1648 Orange Housing Dev. Corp. Linda Boone 217 E. Chapman Ave. TL: (714) 771-1439 Orange, CA 92666 FX: (714) 771-0394 Prairie Pacific Investments Bob Banman 320 [ Santa Maria Street #G TL: (805) 525-8842 Santa Paula, CA 93060 FX: (805) 933-3570 Prairie Pacific Investments Bob Banman 320 E Santa Maria Street #G TL: (805) 525-8842 Santa Paula, CA 93060 FX: (805) 933-3570 Mikuls Construction 67 Modoc Court Venture, CA 93004 Gerald Mikuls TL: (805) 647-2156 FX: (805) 647-2288 Mikuls Construction 67 Modoc 'Court Venture, CA 93004 Karen Mikuls TL: (805) 647-2156 FX: (805) 647-2288 Peter J. Pitassi, AIA 8439 White Oak Avenue Rancho CUcamonga, CA 91730 TL: (909) 980-1361 FX: (909) 944-5814 Derbish Guerra & Assoc Dan Guerra 8331 Utica Avenue TL: (909) Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FX: (909) 987-4306 941-1528 Wells Fargo Bank Gary Steffens 333 S. Grand 7th Floor TL: (213) 680-0141 Los Angeles, CA 90071 FX: (213) 253-7483 Page i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VILLA PACIFICA Proposed Development Team Ocotber 1, 1995 (continued) Tax Credit Investor: Legal Counsel: Mission First Financial 18101 VonKarman Ave #1700 Irvine, CA 92715-1046 Goldfarb & Lipman One Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 consultants: The Agoura Group 5954 Ocean View Drive Oakland, CA 94618-1846 Eric Larsen TL: (714) 757-2410 FX: (714) 757-0140 David Kroot Lynn Hutchlns TL: (415) 788-6336 FX: (415) 788-0999 Edwin Kitsbrier TL: (510) 601-5489 FX: (510) 654-3353 Page 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I WELLS FARGO BANK Real Estale Finance Group AccommodationsJCommun~W Lending ' 333 South Grand Avenue, 7[i~.Floer Suite 730 Los Angeles, CA 90071 August 29, 1995 Mr. Robert Banman Prairie Pacific Investments 320 East Santa Maria, Suite G Santa Paula, CA 93060 Re: Pacifica Villas, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. Banman: We are pleased to advise you that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Lender"), hereby commits to make an interim construction loan ("Loan") for the purpose of financing the development of a 159-unit low*income seniors housing project (the "Improvements") to be located upon that certain real property known as Baseline Road, southwest of Archibald in Rancho Cucamonga California (the "Property"). Lender's decision is based on representations and information supplied by you to us. Lender's obligation to grant the Loan is subject to satisfaction of all of the follc~wing terms and conditions: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project shall be a one hundred and fifty-nine (159) unit Io~v-income housing development on the Property. Of the proposed 159 units, twenty percent (20%) shall be affordable to households earning no more than sixty percent (60%) of the area median income; twenty percent (20%) shall be affordable to households earning no more than fifty percent (50%) of the area median income; and, sixty percent (60%) shall be affordable to households earning no more than forty-five percent (45%) of the area median income. It is understood that one (1) unit will be reserved for onsite staff and will not be subject to rental restrictions. The area median income is determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and is adjusted for household size. BORROWER: The Borrower shall be Prairie Pacific Development a California for-profit corporation, and a nonprofit organization to be determined and subject to WFB approval ("Nonprofit Partner"); or, a limited partnership of which Prairie Pacific Development the Nonprofit Partner are co-general partners. The limited partner shall b.e subject to WFB approval. PURPOSE OF LOAN: The Loan is to be used by Borrower solely to pay costs of constructing the Improvements and for such other pur.poses as Lender expressly agrees to in the loan agreement for the Loan. I I ~ PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS 320 E. Santa Maria St., Suite G · Santa Paula CA g3060 · (805) 525-8842 · Fax (805) 933-3570 J- BOJLI~) OF D]]~CTO~S ,/.. ~17 E. Chapm~A~. ~uge, CA 9a666 Bt~h~e ~ded by ~ge National B~k ~ ~ - ' ~ :~i~': ~ 1 PIXLEY ARMS The seniors who live in these units enjoy a friendly & safe environment close to Senior Center and Old Town Orange. The Craftsman style building was built by a grant from the Orange Redevelopment Agency, 'a loan from Orange County Housing Authority and funds from California Tax Credit Allocation program. WALNUT COURTS The three bedroom, two bath units at Walnut Courts are affordable rental units for families with income below 50% of median income four the county of Orange. Units were constrUcted in 1994 with funds from Orange Redevelopment Agency, Orange County Housing Authority, and California Tax Credit Allocation Committee. CHESTNUT PLACE Construction is underway on 50 rental units for seniors: The development is a joint venture with a private developer. Funds from the Orange Redevelopment Agency and private funds from the California Tax Credit Allocation program made it possible to keep rents affordable. PARKER STREET Two thirds of these three bedroom units are affordable to low income families. A grant from the Orange Redevelopment Agency insured that these units will be affordable for life of project. BROADWAY HOUSE Home to three low income families, Broadway House was donated to OHDC by a private party in return for tax consideration CORDOVA OHDC formed a partnership with another nonprofit, South Bay Community Services, to be co- developers & owners of 40 units of affordable new rental housing in Chula Vista in San Diego County. Completion is anticipated in 1996. Project is funded by the Chuia Vista Redevelopmerit Agency and Tax Credit Allocation program. THE KNOLLS Located on a hill in San Marcos, these 62 units of affordable rental housing for families will provide a beautiful environment for children to live and play. Project is funded by San Marcos Redevelopment Agency and Tax Credit Allocation program. GARDEN COURTS A grant from City of Santa Aria enabled OHDC to purchase 84 units of existing housing and rent 41 of units to low income families. BOWEN COURT The City of Huntington Beach selected OHDC to develop 23 units of affordable senior housing on land purchased by Redevelopmerit Agency. A unique design ensures that units will enhance & blend with neighboring new single family homes. I I I I I I I I I I I I PRAIRIE PACIFIC INVESTMENTS 320 E. Santa Maria St., Suite G · Santa Paula, CA 93060 · (805) 525-8842 · Fax (805) 933-3570 PERSONAL & COMPANY RESUME I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I P.O. Box 20880 Steinbach, Manitoba ROA 2T2 (204) 326-6403 ROBERTD. BANMAN April 30, 1995 320 E. Santa Maria, #G Santa Paula, CA 93060 (805) 525-8842 PERSONAL DATA BORN: January 10, 1945 - Steinbach, Manitoba RESIDENCES: 1945-86 1987-89 1989-95 Steinbach, Manitoba, Canada Ventura, California Santa Paula, California MARITAL STATUS: Married to wife Joanne, on July 11, 1968 Two children: David, born October 31, 1971 Heidi, born December 17, 1974. HOBBIES and INTERESTS: Hunting, fishing, swimming and flying.. AFFILLIATIONS and ASSOCIATES: Active member of the Grace Mennonite Church, Steinbach Founding member - Steinbach Fly-in Golf Course Member - Steinbach Volunteer Fire Department Executive Member - Steinbach Flying Club Member of the Canadian Harvard Aircraft Association Executive Member - Steinbach Curling Club Member - Santa Paula Chamber of Commerce Member - Mennonite Economic Development Association LANGUAGES: English and German EDUCATION: Steinbach Collegiate Institute Steinbach Elementary School LICENSES: California Contractor's License Private Pilot License PUBLIC SERVICE: Elected - Steinbach Town Council Appointed - Chairman of Public Works 1970 -72 1972 -73 April 30, 1995 ROBERT D. BANMAN P.O. Box 20880 Steinbach, Manitoba ROA 2T2 (204) 326-6403 PUBLIC SERVICE (Continued): Elected - Manitoba Legislature as the Progressive Conservative member of the Legislative Assembly for the Constituency of La Verendry. Appointed Industry and Commerce Critic Re-elected - Member of the Legislature 1977 Appointed - Minister of industry, Trade and Commerce..Minister-in-Charge of the Manitoba Development Corporation...Minister of Tourism, Recreation and Cultural Affairs 1979 Appointed - Minister of Fitness, Recreation and Sport. Minister of Cooperative Development. Member of the Provincial Treasury Board. 320 E. Santa Maria, #G Santa Paula, CA 93060 (805) 525-8842 1973 -77 1977 -81 I I I I I I I I Re-elected - Member of the Legislature Appointed Opposition Caucus Whip and Chief Critic for the Department of labor, Civil Service Commission ,and Status of Women (Did not seek re-election in 1986 after 16 years of public service) BUSINESS BACKGROUND - CANADA: Banman Sales and Service Ltd. Joined family Volkswagon and gasoline business in Steinbach as a one-third partner. Founder and President of Eastern Nissan Ltd. Car dealership and retail gasoline Founder and President of Harvest Investments DBA Harvest Honda, Steinbach, Manitoba Purchased E.D. Ventures, LTD Real estate holding company Purchased the George T. Penner Agency General insurance and travel agency now known as Harvest Insurance & Travel 1981-86 1963 1973 1977 1981 1982 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROBERT D. BANMAN P.O. Box 20880 Steinbach, Manitoba ROA 2T2 (204) 326-6403 BUSINESS BACKGROUND - CANADA (Continued): Founder/Partner of Stone Creek Developments Real estate holdings Founder and OwnedPresident, Banco Petroleum Founding President of Harvest Estates, Ltd A Canadian land development company specializing in subdivision, strip malls, and apartment blocks. Founder and President - Steinbach Town Square Downtown Steinbach commercial and residential redevelopmerit project BUSINESS BACKGROUND - UNITED STATES FoundedOwner of Prairie Pacific Investments An investment and development company, noted for the following projects: 1 ) City of Ventura, CA, redevelopment project - 48 unit apartment complex. 2) Pinetree Condominiums - 27 units in Santa Paula. 3) Professional Medical Building - 10,000 sq ff 3 units in Santa Paula. 4) Historical Office Building - Santa Paula High School Division. 5) Developer/General Partner of 150 units- The Santa Paulan Senior Apartments Affordable Senior Housing Project. $10 million 6) Highland Estates - Santa Paula Develop 31 large-lot hillside subdivision. $3.7 million 7) Lingdooley Ranch - a large-lot subdivision of a 325 acre ranch in Santa Paula, CA 8)Villa Del Norte - Joint Venture Development project with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. 88 family units $15.5 million April 30, 1995 320 E. Santa Maria, #G Santa Paula, CA 93060 (805) 525-8842 1983 1983 1984 1986 1988 to present 1988 1987 1989 -93 1992 -93 1990 -93 1989 -91 1989 -92 1993 -95 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I April 30, 1995 P.O. Box 20880 Steinbach, Manitoba ROA 2T2 (204) 326-6403 ROBERTDoBANMAN 320 E. Santa Maria, #G Santa Paula, CA 93060 (805) 525-8842 SUMMARY of EXPERTISE: Extensive background in founding and operating business entities from partnerships and joint ventures to corporations. Particularly knowledgeable in dealing with and understanding the workings of government of all levels. Excellent all-around business acumen. Strong history in retail sales; financial brokering; real estate development; and, residential and commercial construction, from renovation to turn-key affordable housing projects for non-profit organizations, with management skills producing timely completion of projects, on or under budget. Project. Resume fo.F Prairie Pacific Developments 320 E. Santa Mafia St. Suite G Santa Paula, CA 93060 (805) 5254842 Fax (805) 933-3570 The Santa Paulan The Santa Paulan was completed in July of 1992 and is a 150 unit apartment project for seniors. We had to obtain a lot split and new parcel map to construct the units. We dealt extensively with the City of Santa Paula, and had several public hearings before starting construction. Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation was a limited partner during the project development and construction stage and became the general partner in August of 1992. Construction of the $9.8 million project took one year and consists of two three storS' buildings with studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom apartments. There is a large recreation building with a kitchen, extens[vel.v landscaped grounds and also a swimming pool. The project was complimented with the completion by Prairie Pacific of 10,000 sq. ft. of medical office condominiums which were purchased and are now occupied by medical doctors, optometrlsts, and a physical therapy clinic. A two story historical office building was renovated and sold to Santa Paula High School District for superintendent offices in August of 1993.