Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000/06/21 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: 1ST and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. June 21,2000 Aqencv, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander ....................Mayor Diane Williams ...............Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane ...............................Member James V. Curatalo .....................Member Bob Dutton ..............................Member Jack Lam .........................City Manager James L. Markman .............City Attorney Debra J. Adams .....................City Clerk 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. ORDER OF BUSINESS Closed Session ................................. Tapia Conference Room Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ....... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ......................Council Chambers City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Alexander Biane Curatalo Dutton , and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a Proclamation to Patty Geye thanking her for her service on the Community Foundation. Presentation by the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin to the City Council in appreciation of their on-going suppod of the All Star Baseball Game at the Epicenter. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENTCALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: June 5, 2000 (Adjourned Meeting) June 6, 2000 (Special Meeting) Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/24/00, 5/31/00 and 6/7/00 and Payroll ending 5/25/00 and 6/8/00 for the total amount of $2,727,616.90. 3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2000. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Foundation Improvements for Rehabilitation of the Isle House, to be funded from Account No. 28-4333-9835. 15 21 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for Corporate Yard, Phase IINVarehouse Construction in the amount of $495,000.00 (plus 10% contingency) and approve an appropriation from Account Number 01-4648-7043 for the referenced project. RESOLUTION NO. 00-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CORPORATE YARD, PHASE IIANAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize staff to reject the sole bid for the installation of Restroom Paditions at Eight City Parks, to be funded from Funds 40, 41,43 and 47. 7. Approval of reallocation of funding source for Community Development Computer Software, Hardware and Contract Services (CO 00-024 - Tidemark Computer Systems). 8. Approval of a request for a park reservation fee waiver from Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America to hold their Cub Scout Day Camp at Red Hill Community Park on July 10-14, 2000. 9. Approval of a free Youth Baseball Clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on July 7, 2000. 10. Approval to appropriate funds for the replacement purchase of one Mobile M-8A Street Sweeper from Nixon-Egli Equipment Company of Santa Fe Springs, California, through a Piggyback Cooperative Purchase Agreement with the City of Anaheim, California, funded from Account 01-4647-7044 in the amount of $135,000 and unappropriate $135,000 from Account 72-4225-7044. 11. Approval to adopt and implement the New National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) DevelopmentJRedevelopment Guidelines. 12. Approval of Records Retention Schedules for the City Manager's Department, City Clerk's Office, City Council, Code Enforcement, Building and Safety, Finance, Risk Management and the Library. 22 30 31 35 36 37 40 45 46 48 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 13. Approval RESOLUTION NO. 00-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS of Resolutions relating to the November 7, 2000 Election. RESOLUTION NO. 00-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 7TM DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID DATE RESOLUTION NO. 00-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CHARGE TO CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, FOR PREPARATION OF MATERIALS SUBMITFED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATES STATEMENT FOR THE GENEAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7TM 2000 14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Conditional Use Permit 99-10, located at the southeast corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets, submitted by Evergreen Devco, Inc. (Walgreens). RESOLUTION NO. 00-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-10 49 93 94 96 99 101 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERM IT 99-10 15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Interim Basin Maintenance Agreement (CO 00-040) and Ordering the Annexation to Street Light Maintenance Districts No. 1 and 8 for Tract Map Number 15912, located at the southwest corner of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way, submitted by Ryland Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 00-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15912, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 00-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAPS NUMBER 15912 16. Approval of the Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract 15947, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by WL Homes LLC, DBA John Laing Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 00-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15947, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 102 109 112 113 119 122 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 15947 17. Approval of the Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract 15948, located on the south side of Base Line Road west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by WL Homes LLC, DBA John Laing Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 00-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15948, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 00-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 15948 18. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for the Base Line Road south side parkway landscaping for Tracts 15947 and 15948 located on the south side of Base Line Road west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by WL Homes LLC, DBA John Laing Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 00-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD SOUTH SIDE PARKVVAY LANDSCAPING FOR TRACTS 15947 AND 15948 19. Approval of an Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Inland Empire Open, Inc. (CO 00-041) to conduct the Buy. Com Professional Golf Tournament at Empire Lakes Golf Course from October 9-15, 2000. 123 132 135 136 145 148 149 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 20. Approval to authorize, award and execute a Contract with Painting The Town, Inc., of California (CO 00-042), for repainting of restrooms in nine City parks, in the amount of $18,828.00 (plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Funds 40, 41,43 and 47. 21. Approval to authorize, award and execute a Contract with Kitson Specialty Contracting of Santa Fe Springs, California, (CO 00-043) for Resurfacing of Restroom Floors in Six City Parks, in the amount of $11,490.00 (plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Funds 40, 41,43 and 47. 22. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Dan Guerra & Associates (CO 00-044) to provide Engineering Design Services for Haven Avenue Storm Drain and Street Widening Project, from Base Line Road to south of the Route 210 '(30) Freeway in the amount of $325,000, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9703. 23. Approval and execution of a Contract with the California State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (CO 00-045) for the installation of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount not to exceed $200,000.00. 24. Approval of a Joint Use Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (CO 00-046) for the Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic Signal and Widening Improvements. RESOLUTION NO. 00-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE JOINT USE AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 25. Approval to accept the Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 97-09, submitted by Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., located on the northeast corner of Red Oak Street and Arrow Route. RESOLUTION NO. 00-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 97-09 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 161 162 163 165 167 168 170 171 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. NoltemsSubmitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 78 homes within Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8) dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141- 11 and 12. Related File: Variance 99-11. (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 7, 2000) RESOLUTION NO. 00-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 THE APPEAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 78 HOMES WITHIN TENTATIVE TRACTS 15911 AND 15912 IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS OF EAST AVE. AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF- WAY - APN: 227-131-05 AND 227-141-11 & 12 APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a request to construct perimeter tract walls up to approximately 17 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation purposes for Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwetling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-of- way. APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related File: Development Review 99-72. (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 7, 2000) 173 193 173 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-104 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 99-11 TO ALLOW WALLS UP TO APPROXIMATELY 21 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR FREEWAY NOISE MITIGATION PURPOSES WHERE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SIX FEET IS ALLOWED, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS OF EAST AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-131-05 AND 227-141-11 AND 12 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01 B -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC. Request to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 22.9 acres of land located on the north side of Base Line Rd. approximately 765 feet west of the intersection with Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-881-01. A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts has been prepared for consideration. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC. - Request to change Victoria Community Plan zoning designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 22.9 acres of land located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 765 feet west of the intersection with Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-881-01. A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts ha~ been prepared for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 00-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01 B, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 22.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 765 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-881-01 196 198 198 204 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 ORDINANCE NO. 623 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01, CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 22.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 765 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH VICTORIA PARK LAND, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-881-01 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and nodh of the intersection with Lomita Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, and Development Agreement 00-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the Development District zoning designation from General Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use, and the establishment of a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), including deviation from cedain development standards for the residential podion of the base district, on 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with LaGrande Street and north of the intersection with Loreira Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and Development Agreement 00-01. A Negative Declaration of Environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. 208 212 212 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 l0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Northtown Housing Development Corp. for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.020.040 of the Development Code), including deviation from certain development standards for 80-96 senior apartment units and one manager unit on a Mixed Use site of 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with LaGrande Street and nodh of the intersection with Loreira Drive - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and Development District Amendment 00-01. RESOLUTION NO. 00-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP PROVISIONS FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE WITH LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND OFFICE USES FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LAGRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-151-12 ORDINANCE NO. 624 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE WITH A SENIOR -HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LAGRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 202-151-12 212 264 268 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 11 ORDINANCE NO. 625 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-01, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD), INCLUDING DEVIATING FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 80 SENIOR APARTMENT UNITS AND ONE MANAGER UNIT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LAGRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE - APN: 202-151-12 CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA - A proposal to add a Mixed Use Zoning District with accompanying definitions, processing provisions, and development standards to the Rancho Cucamonga, Development Code. ~ ORDINANCE NO..,6-~(first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01, TO ESTABLISH MIXED USE DISTRICTS, WITH ACCOMPANYING DEFINITIONS, PROCESSING PROVISIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06,010.C.1, 17.08,020, 17.08,030 AND 17.08.040A OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 272 289 302 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 12 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. ANNEXATION 00-01 - U.C.P., INC. - A request to approve a statement of intention to annex an approximately 504-acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area generally located north of Highland Avenue between Hanley Avenue and Rochester Avenue - as described in Exhibit "A' (attached) and as shown in Exhibit "B" (attached). RESOLUTION NO. 00-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN ROCHESTER AVENUE AND HANLEY AVENUE AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", ATTACHED, AND AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE THE UTILITY USER'S FEES ORDINANCE NO. 558-D (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO UTILITY USER'S FEES 304 309 310 311 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. REPORT ON CLOSURE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE DURING STADIUM EVENTS 2. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO FILL VACANCIES 315 318 City Council Agenda June 21, 2000 13 CONSIDERATION Of CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO FILL VACANCIES PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 319 322 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 15, 2000, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 5, 2000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council was held on Monday, June 5, 2000, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:43 p.m. by Chairman, President and Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Agencymembers, Boardmembers and Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Chairman, President, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lain, Executive Director and City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Mitch Slagerman, Sr. RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Budget Analyst; Stacy Robinson, Accountant; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer; Karen McGuire-Emery, Sr. Park Planner; John Thomas, Plan Check Manager/Fire; Alan Brock, Plan Check Manager/Building; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Michelle Bancroft, Management Analyst II, and Ron Mayfield, Fire Battalion Chief, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Rodney Hoops, Police Chief; Lieutenant David Lau, Police Department; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEM OF BUSINESS B1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 Jack Lam, City Manager, gave a power point presentation of the 2000/2001 proposed budget. (A copy of the presentation is on file in the City Clerk's office). Mayor Alexander asked when the Hunt Study would be completed. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated within the next few months. Mayor Alexander felt this was important as it relates to the Fire District budget approval. Councilmember Curatalo stated he is happy with what he sees in this budget. Councilmember Williams asked if the City should be setting more money aside for situations that might hit the City in the future that could be costly. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he feels comfortable with the amount of money the City is saving now. He felt Rancho Cucamonga is well prepared. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Prote~ion Districtand City Council Minutes June 5, 2000 Page 2 Councilmember Dutton stated he is comfortable with what is proposed. He felt the City should be doing more with community based programs and felt more partnerships should occur through Community Services. He felt there should be a plan for more lit fields for the kids. Jack Lam, City Manager, talked about additional money that is due to come in and that it can be discussed by the Council as how it should be spent. Councilmember Williams wanted to confirm that the funds are there, but that it still needs to be decided how the money will be spent. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated yes. Councilmember Dutton stated he is concerned about creating new programs and having available new facilities to accommodate them. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated they do consider facilities when creating new programs. He talked about other partnerships the City has and that they are not in the budget because there are no costs to the City to run them. He continued to state they always ask themselves when a new program occurs who the City can partner with. Councilmember Dutton asked what kind of headway is being made on renting out the stadium in order to lower the overhead cost to operate the facility. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated within the next 30 days they will be developing a strategic plan for the use of the stadium. Councilmember Biane commented on the revenues for the RDA budget. He thanked staff for the great job in preparing it. Mayor Alexander felt every year gets better and better. He stated he was glad the animal shelter services can be expanded. Councilmember Dutton stated he would like to know where the $45 million of property tax goes. He stated he called the County and could not get a straight answer. He asked for staff to provide this information to him. Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director, stated she tried to get this information several years ago and could not get a straight answer. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated they would make a current effort to get the information requested. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. There being no response, public comments were closed, C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes June 5, 2000 Page 3 D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, The Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk June 6, 2000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Tuesday, June 6, 2000, convening in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting was called to order at 8:05 a.m. by Mayor VVilliam J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Mitch Slagerman, Sr. RDA Analyst; Jan Reynolds, RDA Analyst; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; and Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director. B. ITEM OF BUSINESS B1. FIELD TRIP TO THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA TO VISIT THEIR DOWNTOWN RETAIL PROJECT The City Council and staff leff for Santa Barbara at approximately 8:05 a.m. to visit the downtown retail project area within the City of Santa Barbara. Also participating in the tour were the following representatives from Forest City and The Gafieria: Victor Grgas, Director of Planning & Government Relations; Colm Macken, Sr. Vice-President; Amhitect David Paoli; and, Scott Laslow, Manager for The Galleria at South Bay. Common Areas There should be one signature space large enough to accommodate civic activities. The center area of focus is envisioned as a town square, where festivals, parades, farmers markets, and some types of performing arts could occur. There should be many smaller spaces throughout the project. The major common area should be soft landscaping with the smaller areas hardscaped. Victor mentioned the Napa Valley Expo as an example of an interesting Town Square. Forest City and David Paoli designed it but it was never built. David said he would provide site plans of the Expo. Project Diagram Colm Macken indicated that he does not expect major changes to the diagram unless Macy's has a major problem with it. An outdoor center is the direction the project is going. Naming the Center Forest City has no proposed name and has no formalized process to determine names for its centers. They like to use the name of the community in the center name when possible. City Council Minu~s June 6,2000 Page2 Agency Member Curatalo and Vice-Chairman Williams indicated they would prefer the use of Cucamonga to Rancho if they had to choose of the two. Rancho is a common term while Cucamonga is unique. Design Elements David Paoli stated that he always writes a narrative of the project describing what it is and what the elements are trying to achieve. He wanted to know if there were historical elements that should be incorporated into the design. He specifically mentioned vineyards, citrus and Route 66. Chairman Alexander and Vice-Chairman Willjams liked vineyards and citrus but did not like Route 66 architecture. Special events with a Route 66 theme are good though. Agency Member Biane did not want a uniform architecture through the center that is indicative of most existing malls. There was a consensus that themed neighborhoods are a direction to take. Care should be taken to take advantage of the mountain vistas whenever possible. Do not put grass near streets (maintenance is an inconvenience to motorists). Palm Trees throughout the project did not receive an enthusiastic response. Palm trees will be used along Day Creek. Palm trees could be used along parkways or at entrances but not in the pedestrian environment. Shade trees are preferred. Pedestrian linkages and trails should be integrated with mall cimulation. Wind is a big factor. David Paoli indicated that in an outdoor center, you cannot provide continuous protected walkways. Brad Bullet will provide historical weather data to Forest City. The use of trellis, arcades with misters, and easily maintained surfaces should be considered to mitigate weather conditions. Vinyl canopies are difficult to maintain, and do not hold up under strong wind conditions. Building heights of two stories maximum are preferred. Streets should not be so wide that it is not inviting to cross the street. The width of State Street in Santa Barbara is a good example. Building Materials The use of red tile roofs and stucco should be limited. Chairman Alexander indicated that he liked brick and wood. Vice-Chairman Williams indicated that she liked steel and glass and Art Deco themes. Both agreed that both material styles could be incorporated into different pads of the mall. Civic Uses A police substation will definitely be on site. David Paoli suggested a library in a separate building could be a nice amenity. A considerable discussion ensued about a performing ads theater. Vice-Chairman Williams would like a signature piece that identifies the community to the region. She advocated a feasibility study to see if makes sense. Discussion included questions as to the size and scope of a performing ads theater and how much the city should subsidize it. Should the theatre be regional or community? City Council Minutes June 6, 2000 Page 3 Jack Lam suggested a library/400-seat theatre option that would have a $1 million annual operating cost. Could meet two goals at same time. Another option was to build a theater and then turn it over to an theater company who would operate it. Then the City would only pay for capital and not annual M&O. Colm Macken agreed to do some research into shopping centers that have performing arts theaters to see what impact they have (positive/negative/neutral) on the centers. Victor Grgas suggested the City contact a consultant to do a round table workshop with the Council to discuss issues related to a theater. Forest City will provide names of consulting firms with expertise in these types of projects. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public, D. ADJOURNMENT The tour and discussion concluded at approximately 2:30 p.m. The group returned to City Hall at 4:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk May 17, 2000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held a closed session on Wednesday, May 17, 2000, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. by President William J. Alexander. Present were Fire Boardmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Willjams, and President William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; and George Rivera, Administrative Services Manager. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS President William J. Alexander announced the item to be discussed in closed session. B1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE GEORGE RIVERA, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MANAGER, PAMELA EASTER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, AND LARRY TEMPLE, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS. - CITY & FIRE C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS ONLY No one was present to comment on the closed session item listed above. Closed session began at 5:37 p.m. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION E. RECESS THE CLOSED SESSION RECESSED AT 6:45 P.M. TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. Fire Protection District Minutes May 17, 2000 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District was held on Wednesday, May 17, 2000, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m. by President William J. Alexander. Present were Boardmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and President Wdliam J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Cathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Michael Toy, Information Systems Specialist; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lieutenant David Lau, Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra J. Adams, Secretary. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation designating the week of May 14 - 20, 2000, as "Emergency Medical Services Week." President Alexander presented the Proclamation to Chief Dennis Michael. Chief Michael informed everyone about their EMS program and invited the public to the Health and Safety Fair to be held at the Lions Park Community Center from 2:00 to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, May 20. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. D. CONSENTCALENDAR Fire Pmtection DistriG Minutes May 17,2000 Page 3 D1. Approval of Minutes: April5,2000 April19,2000 D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 2000. D3. Approval of General Fund 01 Monthly Expenditure Report for April 2000, in the amount of $665,135.50. D4. Approval of Mello-Roos CFD 85-01 Fund 02 Monthly Expenditure Report for April 2000, in the amount of $295,007.58. D5. Approval to adopt the amended budget for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. D6. Approval to nominate Fire Chief Dennis Michael to stand for election to the Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority (FAI RA) Board of Directors (CO FD 00-002). MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS El. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE CONTINUING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000101 IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1. THIS VOTER APPROVED TAX WAS INITIATED IN FY 1986187. Staff report presented by Chief Dennis Michael. President Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, Secretary, read the title of Ordinance No. FD 33. ORDINANCE NO. FD 33 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. FD 33 for the June 21, 2000 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONTINUING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATES (NO INCREASE PROPOSED) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/01 IN MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1. THIS VOTER APPROVED TAX WAS INITIATED IN FY 1989/90. Staff report presented by Chief Dennis Michael. Fire Protection District Minutes May 17, 2000 Page 4 President Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. FD 00-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001 MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by WiIliams to approve Resolution No. FD 00-003. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. F. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. G. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Willjams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC Secretary CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-24-00 (99/00) RUN DATE: 05/24/00 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 6244 TOOLS-R-US 214 SAN BERN COUNTY SOLID WASTE M~MT 58411 CATRON, DALE B. 22023 48 AND CHIZOMA~ INC. 4635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY 6451 A A AUTOMOTIVE 22010 A DREAM N' PRODUCTION 10~8 A.Q. ENQINEERINQ, INC. I AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO., INC. 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 7 ABLETRONICS 22020 ADAME~ NANCY 6309 ADAMSON, RONALD 22018 AGUILAR~ DELIA 22019 ALI~ DEBRA 4322 ALL AROUND PEST & TERMITE 3448 ALL WELDINQ ~73 ALPHAQRAPHICS 5650 ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOQICAL ASSOCIATES 24 ARBOR NURSERY INC. 5807 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 2014 ARTISTIC SIQNATURES 6001 ARTUCOVICH, JAY 4782 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2437 ASSOCIATED ~ROUP 22011 B & A CONSTRUCTIDN~ INC, 4102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 6632 BALLOON CREATIONS b~ CLARA 22014 BARRATT AMERICAN~ INC. 6372 BARRON'S 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 22016 SATIZ, VERONICA 5341 BUCKNAM& ASSOCIATES 22026 BUDAPEST FILMS 1001 BURTRONICS 5959 BUSINESS WEEK 4949 C L 0 U T 62 CALIFORNIA JOURNAL 1223 CALSENSE 22013 CALTI QROUPo INC. 22022 CANOLA, TERESA 22012 CANYON CREEK RANCH 22021 CASTANEDA~ ~ARLA 68 CENTRAL CITIES SI~NS~ INC. 22015 CHANDRAMOULI, RADHIKA 6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MONTHLY SERVICE TUITION REIMBURSEMENT PERMIT FEES REFUND PHOTO DEVELOPING & SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND INSPECTION SERVICES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE REPAIRS OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VISA MONTHLY BILLINQ8 SUPPLIES/SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES WATERSHED MQMNT CLEAN WATER BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND CONSULTANT SERVICES PARTIAL REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION REGISTRATION SUBSCRIPTION OFFICE/MAINTENANCE ESUIPMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND ADVERTISIN~ FEE ** CHECK# OVERLAP 151500 - 152007 152050~ 300.00 152051 - 152052 # 152053 7,053,00 152054 ~ 152055 720.86 152057 ~87.80 # 152058 352.14 152060 3,17 152061 57,60 15206~ 1,344.00 152063 45.00 152064 35.00 15~065 1,665.00 ~ 152066 105.00 152067 134. 152068 1,850.00 # 15206~ 646. 50 152071 - 152071 # 152072 5,538.80 152074 350.00 152076 3,5~8. 85 152077 10. O0 # 152078 5,672,28 15207e 35.00 152080 725.70 152082 33.47 152083 25,00 152084 Io3e7,48 152085 158.50 # 152086 176.43 152088 48.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-24-00 (ee/oo) RUN DATE: 05/24/00 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPT10N , WARR NO WARR. ANT. 3006 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 2258 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST,, 22017 COONS, RINDY 6598 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. INC. 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2478 DAPPER TIRE 41271 DE LA CRUZ, MONICA 6302 DEAN, INC., STUART 4641 DEL MECHANICAL 41265 DELGADO, LORRIE 5846 DELTA MICROIMAGIN~, INC. 6064 DEPARTMENT ISSUE 107 DETCO 5138 DIAMOND FENCE CO. 41228 DICENSO~ GENEVIEVE 4544 DICK~ ERIC 6275 DILLSTAR PRODUCTIONS 858 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS, INC. 41266 ELMORE, KAREN 4436 EPIXTECH, INC. 41267 ESTRELLA, RHONDA 5521 EXPERIAN 5e17 FASTENAL COMPANY 41268 FELIX~ MARY 6556 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 4371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 5288 GARRETT CONC. CORING & SAWING~ INC. 41272 GARRISON~ LESLIE 41269 GEO MATIC 3~92 GIBSY'S FENCING MATERIALS 93 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. 3827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 41270 GRICAR, KATHRYN 5387 GST TELECOM, INC, 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 6160 GTR TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION 6383 HV. CARTER CO. 1244 HAVEN BUILDING MATERIALS 4724 HI-WAY SAFETY~ INC. 437 HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO.~ INC, 4033 1234 3276 1218 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE HOSEMAN HOUSE OF RUTH HUNT~ JENNIFER ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP EGUIPMENT RENTAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND CONTRACT SERVICES SERVICE & REPAIR RECREATION REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICE RECREATION REFUND EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH CONTRACT SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND PERSONNEL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TUITION REIMSURSEMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REGISTRATION FEE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND INTERNET SERVICES ~ CHECK# OVERLAP 1520~8 239.78 1520ee 1,606. 50 152100 3.75 ,152101 3,750.00 152102 - 152105 # 152106 # 152107 2,146,13 152108 31.00 # 152109 13,975.00 152110 970.72 152111 28.00 152112 424.28 152113 339.41 # 152114 882.47 # 152115 1o4~5.00 # 152116 25.00 # 152117 75.00 152118 110.27 152119 15.00 152120 45,00 152121 1,077, 50 152122 44.00 152123 50.00 152124 31.61 152125 25.00 152126 250. O0 152127 126.68 152128 181.90 15212~ 250.00 152130 34. 50 152131 125. 00 152132 56. O0 # 152133 248.18 152134 45.00 152135 1,060,00 152136 - 152136 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-24-00 (ge/O0) RUN DATE: OS/24/00 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ~ CHEC~I OVERLAP ~2 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS 182152 35.76 2507 INVENSYS BUILDINg SYSTEMS INC. SERVICE/SUPPLIES ~ 152153 2~4~0.00 612 JAESCHKE INC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 152154 128.40 32504 JARDON~ BOBBIE RECREATION .152155 20.00 175 JOBS AVAILABLE ADVERTISEMENTS 152136 156.40 6565 JOHNSON, CHARLOTTE SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 1521~7 880.00 4431 JON~S FLAGIS & POLES RECREATION SUPPLIES 152158 136.00 17~ RAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN MEDICAL INSURANCE 15215~ 27,~37.27 3250e KALIN, PATRICIA RECREATION 152160 14.00 60~0 KON~ SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 15216~ 480.00 32503 KONOP, LINDA RECREATION 152162 40.00 6410 L.A. FLEET MONITORING RECREATION REFUND 152163 2?6.31 324e2 LARSON, MELISSA RECREATION 152164 31.00 84e LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 152165 2eB.~5 32500 LEAL, SUSAN RECREATION 152166 20.00 32506 LIEBERffiAN, SUZIE RECREATION 152167 48.00 32505 LILLEY~ TERESA RECREATION 152168 28.00 324~ LISS~ LAURA RECREATION 13216e 25.00 32487 LOMA VISTA WOODS BUSINESS LICENSE 132170 30.02 1455 LONG'S DRUGS FILM PROCESSING 152171 36.86 3156 LU'S LIOHTHOUSE, INC. OIL ANALYSIS 152172 25.30 4000 M S A MEMBERSHIP I52174 115.00 4000 M S A MEMBERSHIP 152175 300.00 324~1 MACKINNON, MAUREEN RECREATION # 152176 30.00 32507 MALEKOW, LAWRENCE RECREATION 152177 48.00 54e MARIPDSA HDRTICULTURAL ENT. INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE # 152178 13,096.77 5560 MARVAC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152179 71.61 32494 MCDONALD, ~AREN RECREATION 152180 31.00 324~6 MCKINNON~ SUSAN RECREATION 152181 31.00 324~5 MENDEZ, SUSAN RECREATION 152182 3~.00 32493 MORENO, RIM RECREATION 152183 31.00 5885 MORITA, DUANE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .152184 5,217.00 1171 MOTOROLA COMMUN. & ELEC. o INC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152185 4,597.23 32498 MOUSSAVI, SARAH RECREATION 152186 35.00 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 152187 602.90 744 NATIONAL DEFERRED DEFERRED COMP 152188 2~285.60 32508 NIXON~ PAM RECREATION 152189 35.00 32502 NORMAN, DARRYL RECREATION 152190 45.00 523 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 1521e2 1,0e6. eo 6584 OLIVA, PHILIP RECREATION REFUND 1521~3 120.00 304~ ONTARIO FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO. FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICES 1521e4 41.68 4142 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO. MAINTENANCE REPAIRS # 1521~5 81.40 1224 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPINg SERVICE~INC. STRIPINg SERVICES 1521e6 10,746.45 32488 ORANGE STAIR & MILLWORk INC, BUSINESSM LICENSE 1521e7 15.46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD~ 05-24-00 (99/00) RUN DATE: 05/24/00 PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. CHECK# OVERLAP 235 1441 818 32501 55~7 6148 6206 3e52 758 2705 5174 545 12146 12514 12515 5105 581 1381 214 5338 132 12518 22025 4176 3058 3632 4733 6411 12083 3388 4558 2~58 7271 3437 2517 OWEN ELECTRIC PACIFIC BELL PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. PETERSON, LUANA PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS PHOTOMAX SUPPLY CO. PICKHAM, JULIE PIRON~ SHAUN PLANNING CENTER, THE POMA DISTRIBUTING CO POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHURCHES POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO., INC. PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC. PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY QUALITY ONE ENGRAVERS QUINN~ SHERLINE R H F~ INC. RANCHO CUCAMONQA FAMILY YMCA RED WINQ SHOE STORE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SPAIN, JR, WILLIAM V. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION SUNRISE FORD SWEET'S CLEAN SWEEP TOWN & COUNTRY CLEANERS TBEJO, FRANCISCO & DEBRA TRUSREEN - LANDCARE REGIONAL U S GUARDS CO., INC, UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNGASHICKI JULIE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE URSUA~ DEBBIE VAN WAQONER~ EVE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152204 24,746. 50 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~52205 6,2e7,45 CONCRETE SUPPLIES 152206 57.64 RECREATION ,152207 40.00 MONTHLY SERVICE # 152208 1,442.6~ MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152209 422,18 RECREATION 152210 25.00 CONTRACT SERVICES 152211 144.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152212 1o125.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES # 152213 20,883.23 WEST END HUNGER PROGRAM 152214 2e7.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 152215 13~.2~ MAINT/RECREATION SUPPLIES 152216 57.44 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152217 ~.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152218 10.78 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 15221~ 210,00 VEHICLE MAINT SERVICE&SUPPLIES 152220 1~1. e3 PROGRAM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 152221 560.00 SAFETY BOOTS 152222 282.80 BUS LICENSE REFUND 152223 25.00 RECREATION REFUND 152224 35.00 PRINTS 152225 17.46 RECREATION REFUND # 152226 50.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS 152227 289,80 RECREATION REFUNDS 152228 31.00 CAL-ID PROGRAM # 15222~ 180.00 pERMIT/UNDERGROUND STORAGE T~S 152230 25.00 MONTHLY SERVICE 152231 3,~6.66 TELETHON SUPPORT 152232 300. 00 MAINT SUPPLIES 152233 200.42 RECREATION REFUND 152234 60.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152235 ~8.30 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 15223~ 40.00 <<< 152237 - 15224~ >>> MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 152247 10,706.~8 C.E.R.T. INSTRUCTOR 152248 150.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL # 15224~ 161.04 UNDEROROUND STORAGE TANK 152250 544,00 RENEW CPA LICENSE 152251 160.00 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 152252 708. 33 AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES 152253 78+20 RECREATION REFUND 152254 3,880,00 RECREATION REFUND 152255 160.67 REIMBURSEMENT 152256 20.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 152257 17,020,00 SECURITY GUARD SERVICE 152258 438.00 UMP SERVICSS # 15223e 3,056.00 REFUND PERS DEDUCTION # 152260 124.41 UNIFORM SERVICES 152261 33. e0 RECREATION REFUND 1522~2 2~,00 RECREATION REFUND 1522~3 50.00 · ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON9A LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD; 05-24-00 RUN DATE: 05/24/00 PAGE: 5 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. CHECK# OVERLAP 2210 VARNEY, GARY MINI EGUIPMENT MEETING 152264 23.83 1103 VISTA PAINT MAINT SUPPLIES 1522~5 738.30 6263 VISUAL IMAGING PRODUCTS RECREATION REFUND 15~266 4977 VOSS~ MARY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT # 152267 70.00 12161 WALKER~ TRYNA RECREATION REFUND 182268 90.00 ~13 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES 2(~7 WESTERN ROCK CO ASPHALT & CONCRETE 152270 35.00 TOTAL 334,793.16 CITY DF RANCNQ CUCAHONGA LIST OF HARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 05-31-00 C991003 RUN DATET 05/31/00 PAGE: 1. VENDOR NINE ITEM DESCRIPTION UARR NO HARR. ANT. gO CHECKB 0VERLAP 21606 8URDELAS, TERESA RECREATION REFUND ((( 144248 6192 SPAINmJRwHILLIAM V. C,E.R,To INSTRUCTDR (<< 152249 65 CUCANONGA CO HATER DZST MONTHLY HATER BILLINGS ((( 152272 6635 A & N pHOT0GRAPHY 10 A g R TIRE SERVICE 6489 A E S 1 AA EQUZPNENT RENTALS CO,e INC, 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 7 ABLETRONZCS 4347 ACCURATE SHOO, AUTO, TRUC· & 6309 ADAHSON, RONALO ZZOZ9 ADVINCULA, ROBERT 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR. 973 ALPHAGRAPHICS 17 ALTA Flee EQUIPMENT COo 6354 AMAZON°CON 6560 ANTECN LIGHTING SERVICES 22037 AMUSEMENT BUSINESS 22027 ANZURESe SYLVIA 1291 ARCUS DATA SECURITY 22031 AUGUSTINE, ANNETTA ZZO39 OADIDLA, ROCIO A475 BARNES g NOBLE ZZ036 BELL, KENHE 6323 BELLSOUTH HIRELESS DATA L.P* 1247 BLAKE pAPER CO.e INC. 4833 BOOKS ON TAPE, INCo 22030 BRACKEN, NANCY 4369 21606 5746 3751 22038 1223 22032 5041 6520 68 1061 22034 6384 5958 22028 73 22033 ~301 PHOTO DEVELOPING A SUPPLIES VEHICLE HAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE NAZNTENANCEISUPPLEES HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE HAINTENANCE/SUPPLXES INSPECTION SERVICES RECREATION REFUND CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS OFFICE SUPPLIES SERVICE/SUPPLIES UNIFORR APPLICATION REFUND LIGHTING SUPPLIES ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RECREATION REFUND DATA STORAGE RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND CONHUNICATION CHARGE RECREATION SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND BRODART BOOKS BURDELASe TERESA BUSINESS SPECIALTIES C E L S O C CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY OF LOCAL ARTS CALSENSE CASTROe JANET CATRONt DALE CDNOH, INCo CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS, INCo CHAMPION ARARDS g $PECZALZTIES CHZAPPONE, SHELITA CHZLDRENmS PLUS, INC. CHIVERS AUDIO BOOKS CHRISTIANSEN, DONNA CITRUS NOTORS ONTARIO, ZNC. CLARK, VICTORIA CONPUSA, INCo LIBRART SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPL2ES pROFESSIONAL SERVICES HENBERSHIP RENENAL OFFICEINAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT RECREATION REFUND TUITION REIMBURSEMENT RECREATION REFUNDS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ENGRAVED PLAQUE RECREATION REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE NAINTENANCE/$UPPLEES RECREATZON REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE$ 164Z670 30.00- 15ZZBT 152Z480 150.00- 152270 1522710 102,82 152274 152Z75 21.48 152276 1,526oZ5 15ZZT7 439.62 152278 643°65 lSZZT9 604,80 152280 A87~98 152281 1,275,19 152282 ll3T6oOO 152Z83 ZOO.OO 152284 60o31 152285 90.98 152286 771o65 152287 113.12 152288 5,800o00 152289 hOZ6.0Z 152290 129o00 152291 30°00 152292 384°00' 152293 30.00 152294 ZOoO0 152295 19o96 152296 66,06 152297 3,847.TT 152298 115o96 152299 16.16 152300 30.OO 152301 152302 3e118.19 152303 30°00 152306 6,060°72 152305 28.76 152306 75.00 152307 24,683°98 152308 46.00 152309 55.11 152310 750.00 152311 201~44 152312 1,163.70 152313 ZS.OO 152316 1.891.25 152315 6,50 152316 60°00 152317 68,61 152318 12.00 152319 1,866o02 152326 15Z301 - i I e · · 132320 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOHGA LZST OF NARRAHTS PDR PEREUD: 05-31-00 (99/003 RUN DATE: 05/51/00 PAGE: 2, VENDOR NAME 1TEN DESCRIPTXON HARN NO MARRo ANT. 130 930 85 4282 41273 4366 tO7 41088 3364 42274 5917 41276 6556 41277 61278 6070 3356 5955 41275 3827 4864 137 4686 32522 5699 6367 616 4845 32523 4150 158 6852 6557 2927 1Z1e 2315 3452 612 325~0 5022 32519 6568 32520 6595 32521 1024 6090 32516 ~ CMECRI OVERLAP COHPUTER'SERVXCE CO CORONA CLAY COMPANY CUCANONGA CO MATER DZST D 7 CONSULTEND XNC. OECOTEAU, DORA DENCO. XRC. DETCO DOUGLASS, DONNA EZGHTM AVENUE GRAPMXCS ELPERN, BARRY PASTEHAL COMPANY FERNANDEZe LOZS FZNESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FRZENDS OF THE READ SAN DZEGOI FULGHAN SHDMER PANSp XNC. GALE GROUP, THE GARCZA. VXVZAN GOLDEN NEST DX$TRZBUTING GRAETENt JANE PENNY GRAFs CARA GREEN ROCK PONER EGUXPMENT GOOLZER pUOLXSH[NG COMPANY GTE CALXFORNIA GUARDZAN HANSON, JOANNE HARALANOOS BEVERAGE COMPANY HENDERGER COeXNC.e JOHN C. HXGHSMZTH COgXNC- HXLLSXOE CDNMUNZTY CHURCH MOGUEe JOSEPHXNE MOLEDAY PRXNTXNG HOLLZDAT ROCK CO., ZNC. HOPKXNS, LQRX HORST COMPANY Z C 6 O - SAN DZEGO AREA CHAPTER ZNDU$TRIAL 0157RZBUTION GROUP ZNLAND NHOLESALE NURSERY ZNTRAVAZA ROCK 6 SAND JAE$CHKE ZNC., C.Ro JAMAR CNC JNTN A ASSOCXATE$ KACHZS, RZTA KASHEFZNEJAD, FARESH KASZCAe LORRAZNE KERREYe JULES KLECKER. JOHN KOCH MATERZALS COMPANY KONG, SOPHAK LACASELLA, JOHN SXGNAL MAXNTENANCE/SUPPLXES MAZNTENANCE SUPPLXES ((( 15Z3ZT MONTHLY MATER BXLLXNGS MAZNTENANCE REPAXRS/SUPPLXES RECREATZON REFUND DFFICE SUPPLZES DFFZCE SUPPLZES RECREATZON REFUND OFFZCE $UPPLZE$ RECREATION REFUND HAXNTENANCE SUPPLZE$ RECREATXON REFUND PERSONNEL SERVZCES REGXSTRATZON FEE OU$ZNE$S LZCENSE REFUND LZBRARY BOOKS MZLEAGE REIMBURSEMENT RECREATZON SUPPLZE$ RECREATXDN REFUND MXLEAGE REXMBURSEMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLXES LZBRART SUPPLZE8 (<( 152369 MONTHLY TELEPHONE 8XLLXNGS NEDXCAL PRENZUM RECREATION REFUND RECREATZON SUPPLXE$ MAZNTENANCE SUPPLXES MAXNTENANCE SUPPLXES MONTHLY RENT RECREATZON REFUND PRXNTXNG OF THE GRAPEVZNE MAXNTENANCE SUPPLXES MXLEAGE REXNBURSENENT BUSZNESS LlCENSE REFUND MENBERSHZP FEES MAZNTENANCE SUPPLXES MAXNTENANCE SUPPLZES MAXNTENANCE 5UPPLXES VEHXCLE MAXNTENANCE BUSXNESS LXCENSE REFUND CONSULTZNG SERVZCES RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LlCENSE REFUND RECREATZON REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUNO MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES BU$1NES$ LICENSE REFUNO OUSINESS L3CENSE REFUND 1523Z5 71,576.2Z 1523Z6 942o81 152328 ))) 152329 169788.94 152330 lgOOO.OO 152331 60°00 152332 113.25 152333 264.60 152336 40oOO 152335 667°62 152336 120.00 152337 1,261.33 152338 51.00 152339 1,739.50 152360 66o00 152361 12.60 152362 116o93 152343 22.63 152344 69.84 152365 30.00 152366 22,43 152~i. 7 749.96 152)4.8 112o19 152350 152351 3,830.56 152352 746.70 152353 3O.OO 152354 33&.10 152355 9m066.96 152356 309.00 152357 1,O00.O0 152358 30.00 152359 17,762.11 152360 1,247.89 152361 500°00 152362 19000o00 152363 7O.OO 152364 175.94 152365 103.44 152366 115.00 152367 242.12 152368 7.79 152369 hSOOeOO 152370 30.00 152371 9eo.oo 152372 60.00 152373 70100 15Z374 30o00 152375 640o27' 152376 480.00 152377 ;43.65 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LEST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZOD: 05-31-00 (991003 RUN DATE: 05131100 PAGEf 3. VENDOR NANE ZTEN DESCRZPTXDN WARR NO NARRo ANTe ~ CHECA8 OVERLAP 339 LANe JACK 3Z1 LANDSCAPE UESTe 1Nee 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS, ENCe 197 LEAGUE OF CALZFORNZA CZTXES 5512 LXBRARY VXOEO CONPANY 572 LZNEAR SYSTENS 1455 LONG°S DRUGS 5662 LOS ANGELES CDCA COLA DTL. COo 32511 LOYAL ARKS SECURZTY SERVZCE 3156 LU'S LZGHTNOUSEe ZNCo 1062 N C Z HORLDCDN 3987 N H A SC C/D GRADUATE CENTER FOR 549 NARXPOSA HERTZCULTURAL ENT.ENCe ZSO NARTZNEZ TDIZNG AND AUTONOTZVE 3871 NATT'S HARDRARE 21998 NOEKE-ENANENe TON E. 6596 NZCRQ CONTROLS, ZNTERNATZONAL 5852 NEDNEST TAPE 749 NZJAC ALARK CONPANY 32514 NZKE LEVZNE 3316 NR T'S 24-HRe TOMEND 2468 NRS NELSON'S TOY S BOON STORE 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 32512 NELSON°S GLASS 5568 NET 10 TECNOLOGXES 433 NZXDN-EGLX EQUXPNEWT 4653 OCLC, 1NCe 523 6586 6904 1441 3Z513 4223 3Z518 487 6623 6168 6206 6399 65 32524 5556 32515 32517 251 345 266 228 TO Z600 OFFZCE DEPOT DLZVA, PHZLZP OTTo LAURA PACXFZC BELL PACIFZC UTZLXTY XNSTALLATZON ZNC PAPER DTRECT, ~NCe PAPPAR HELLEAR PATTON SALES CORPo PENNORTNY PERONe SHAUN PLANNERO CENTER, THE PRENXER PERSONNEL PRUDENTXAL OVERALL SUPPLY PULGAR, RARZLYN QUALZTY BOOKS, ZNCe QUONAZw,NUSHZR QUZZONe ZARAH R & R AUTONQTZVE R D O EQUZPNENT COIPONERPLAN RALPHS GROCERY CONPANY RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY RANCNO'CUCANONGA CNANBER RANCNO CUCANQNGA FXRE DESERECT LEAGUE NEETEND 152378 30e69 LANDSCAPE NAXNTENANCE 152379 9,192e08 NAZNTEWANCE $UPPLZES I 152380 395e39 ANNUAL DUES 152381 13e00 LZERARY SUPPLZES 152382 900.22 NAZNTENANCE $UPPLXE$ 152383 3e814.35 FXLN PROCESSEND 15Z384 47°46 RECREATZON SUPPLXES 152385 125841 BUSZNESS LXCENSE REFUND 152386 39.40 GEL ANALYSES 152387 86.93 TELEPHONE SERVZCE$ 152388 3.67 NENBERSHZP DUES 152389 155.00 LANDSCAPE NAZNTENANCE 8 152390 17.552e73 TOMEND SERVZCES 152391 65°00 WAZNTENANCE $UPPLZES 152392 8.91 DEPDSXT REFUND 152393 ZO0oOO RECREATZON REFUND 152394 28689e44 LXDRARY SUPPLXES 152395. 95.94 ALARR SERVXCES 152396 6Z4.OO DEPOSZT REFUND 152397 ZeOOOeO0 TONXNG 152398 9OeOO RECREATION SUPPLZES 152399 396~76 VENZCLE NAZNTENANCE I 152400 296°43 DUSZNESS LXCENSE REFUND 152401 9cOO Z ON-SXTE CLASSES # 152402 38930e96 VEHZCLE NAZNTENANCE I 152403 85e64 CORE SERVXCE$ CHARGES 152/4.04 Z8e63 CO( 152405 - 152605 DFPXCE SUPFLZES I 152406 Ze734o46 RECREATXDN REFUND 152407 XZOeOO XNSTRUCTOR SNR.EXERCXSE CLASS I 152408 430.50 NAXNTENANCE SUPPLXES I 152609 1,442e04 BUSZNESS LZCENSE REFUND 16Z410 21.00 RECREATZON $UPPLZES I 152411 83.83 RECREATZON REFUND 152412 lSeOO NAXNTEWANCE SUPPLZE$ 152413 43e80 RECREATXON REFUND 152414 1,205.64 CONTRACT SERVXCES 152415 174,00 BUSXNESS LXCENSE REFUND 152416 6,307,00 RECREATZON REFUND I 152417 739.26 NAZNTEWANCE SUPPLXE$ ISZ418 7.41 RECREATZON REFUND 152419 tOO.Q0 LXBRARY SUPPLXES I 152420 947.47 RECREATXON REFUND IS2421 ZOOcOO RECREATXON REFUND ISZ4ZZ 200°00 VENXCLE NAXNTeSUPPLXES&SERVZCE I 152423 562.06 NAXNT SUPPLXES I 152424 878.75 RECREATXDN $UPPLXES 152425 105.92 REZNDURSE GRANT FUNDS 152426 24e732.83 NENOERSNXP NEETEND 15Z421 60O, OO SALARY AND BENEFXTS 152428 15OeO0 CXTT OF EANCNO CUCAmQNGA LIST OF UARRANTS FOR PERiDO: 05-31-00 RUN DATE: 05/33/00 PAGE: /ENDDR NAME ITEM DESCRiPTiON WARR NO WARR, A!fr, · ~ CHECKI OVERLAP ZO7 RANCHDMZNi STORAGE mINI STORAGE # 1524.29 leOZO~O0 6130 ROW LOCK ~ MET SERVICE mAiNTENANCE SUPPLIES N 15Z4.30 4.06 5618 R/CHARDS, HATSONe .& GERSHON LEGAL SERVICES I 152(31 7e977,66 12519 ROBiNSON, CLYDE RECREATION REFUND 1524.32 60°00 6347 ROSEN PUBLiSHiNG ~ POKERKiDS RECREATION REFUND 1524'33 509,60 12520 ROSENTHAL, JULZE RECREATION REFUND 152634. 32.00 2585 SAMPLES. RYAN NiLEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 1524.35 100o00 303 SAN BERN COUNTY ENGiNEERiNG OFFICE SUPPLIES 1524.'36 ZOODOg 581 SAN BERN COUNTY CAL-IO PROGRAM 15Z437 le365,00 1381 SAN BERN COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL PEHHZTIUNDERGROUND STORAGE TKS 1524'38 ZOO. GO 12521 SANCHEZ, GUADALUPE RECREATION REFUND 162639 60,00 6630 SANDERS LOCK & KEY RECREATION REFUND 1524.4'0 80.00 2185 SETON IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1526~1 233.80 1829 SHARED TECM. FAIRCHILD TELECOm. ZNC TELEPHONE SERVICES 8 1524.4.Z 390.00 2760 SKILL PATH, 3NC, SEMINAR 15Z4.4'3 199o00 1327 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES I 1524'4.4 300°50 319 S0 CALZF GAS COMPANY MONTHLY GAS BILLS 15244.5 115,03 14'32 SOUTHERN CALiFORNiA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS 15Z4.4'6 4.6o21 1ZSZZ SPENCER. RICHARD RECREATION REFUND 152661 30°00 11752 STANDARD PACIFZC TEMP UTILITY OVERPAYMENT 152~68 leOOQoOQ 5281 STERICYCLEe INC. 5HARPS PROGRAN t 1524.4.9 1,916.55 4733 SUNRISE FORD AUTO SERVICE ~ SUPPLIES I 152450 401.54. 5685 SURE-SHRED DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION DOCUMENT SNREDOZNG 1524.51 2O.OO 5079 SYNCHRQNEX VIDEO DETECTION 5YSTEH 1524.52 12903Z.64. 2344 TARGET- 7OUTN PROGRAM 6 DAY CAmP SUPPL I 152453 170.57 6159 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONSULTING GRP BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND I 1524.56 7,106o05 3637 UNIFZRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORm SERVICES I 152455 lm135o4.4. 12Z6 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE I 1524.56 55.09 66Z2 VERiCQM COMPUTERS, iNC. RECREATION'REFUND Z52457 3mOTZoO0 4.99 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY ViSiON SERVICE BILLING 152458 69501°76 1103 VISTA PAINT NAINT SUPPLIES I 1524.59 796.12 6263 VISUAL IMAGING PRODUCTS RECREATION REFUND 152660 334.,54 125Z3 NALLY'S NATER HORLD, iNC RECREATION REFUND 152661 263,60 213 MAIZE, KLEEN-LZNE CORP mAINT SUPPLIES I 15246Z 9t109.75 1522 NE TIP CITY COUNCIL AD 1524'63 ZZS.0O 637 NEST END UNIFORMS UNIFORm SERVICE 152664. 180.37 637 NEST END UNZFORMS UNIFORM SERVICE 152465 le64'5.00 4405 NEST END TNCA RECOGNITION CELEBRATION 152466 34Z.70 5526 NEST GROUP PUBLISHING · 152467 24'2°76 11819 NZDyAATHEOJA, I'IULZATI RECREATION REFUNDS 152468 30,00 12524 NZLKZNSQNtJEAN&LAU OFFICES A BARENS RECREATION REFUND 152669 12eSOOoOO 4.983 WILSONm COMPANY, H.W. LIBRARY · 152470 295.15 1Z525 UyNDHAm PALM SPRINGS HOTEL RECREATION REFUND 15Z471 197,2Z 12526 yNOSTROZA, HART RECREATION REFUND 15247Z 60,00 66IT ZD JOURNALS BUSXNESS LICENSE REFUND 152473 59°00 371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES 152616 38,36 TOTAL CITY OF RANCNO CUCANBNGR LZST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZOO; 06-07-00 C99/00) RUN DATE: 06/07/00 PAGES 1 ENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRIPTION HARM NO NARRo ANT, 21612 AMERICAN BILDERMESS ZOO & AQUARIUM ZZOO5 CLERK OF THE SAN BERNARDZNO 32695 MENDEZ, SUSAN 32533 OLIVEERIe RICK 6356 AMAZON.CON 250 MARTZNEZ TObIN6 AND AUTOMOTIVE 32534 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 6356 ANAZON.CDM 5602 4 INPRZNT,COM BY NELSON MARKETING lO A ~ R TZRE SERVICE 6451 A A AUTOMOTIVE 2732 ABC LOCKSNZTHS 4347 ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK 3785 ACTION ART 579Z ADAM, ROBERT 5231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING, INC, 22040 ALL STATE PAPER g ~ETAL RECYCLING 3448 ALL BELDENG 6290 ALLENs TONY 3778 ALPERT, NELANIE 6356 AMAZONeCON 5658 ANERZCAN FIRST AID 6 SAFETY 22 AMER3CAN PUDLZC NORKS ASSOCIATION 2693 ANTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 2295 ARROM TRAILER SUPPLIES 667 ARROUMEAD CREDIT UNION 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 6102 8 & K ELECTRIC NNOLESALE ZZOAI BAG SPECIALISTS 22042 BARBER pIPELINE ZZO43 BARZSHMAN, HEIDI 33 BASELZNE TRUE VALUE MARDNARE 5791 BELETTOe NANCY 5119 BENSON, NAURY 4407 BETTER ENERGY IDEAS 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO,, Z N C, 4699 BORDNER, MARDIE 1166 5RUNSBICK DEER CREEK LANES 552 8URK--BLACKSCHLEGER, ROSEANN 2640 BURRUSO, LISA Z559 C A L B O 6735 CALOLYMPZC SAFETY 1223 CALSENSE 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS, INC, DEPOSIT TR 15711 RECREATZQN DEPOSIT REFUND ~ CHECKI OVERLAP 151303; 50.50- 151304 - 151876 15187Te 1,500.00- 151878 - 152181 >>> 1521620 39,00- 152183 - 152271 >)) 1522720 500.00 152213 - 152Z87 ))> UNIFORM APPLICATION REFUND i 152Z880 5,800.00- (<( 152289 - 152390 ))) TONING SERVICES 15Z3910 45,00- <(( 152392 - 152474 >)) LAFCO APPLICATION 1524750 6.800,00 UNIFORM APPLICATION REFUND IS24760 OOO.OO ((( 152477 - 152480 >)) SUPPLIES I 152481 606.52 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 15248Z 1e659,13 RECREATION REFUND 152483 3Z,OR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 152484 179,66 VEHICLE MAZNTENANCEISUPPLZES 152485 199.32 RECREATION SUPPLIES 152486 63Z,60 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152487 116,64 PROFESSXONAL SERVICES 152488 450,00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152689 17.46 MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 152450 95.00 ~NSTRUCTORPAYNENT 152491 324.00 INSTRUCTDR PAYMENT 152492 969,00 UNIFORM APPLICATION REFUND 152493 59000°00 SUPPLIES 152454 60,18 APNA MEMBERSHIP 152495 48.00 MONTHLY SERVICE I 152496 630.15 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 152497 135.39 VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS 152498 61,3Z PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 152499 4,230o00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 15Z500 860,11 6USXNESS LICENSE REFUND 152501 49,65 DEPOSIT REFUND 152502 leOOOoO0 RECREATION REFUND 15Z503 Z5, OO MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 152504 93,47 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152505 76°60 INSTRUCTOR pAYMENT 152506 336,00 pROFESSIONAL SERVICES 152507 IXZeO5 RECREATION SUPPLIES 152508 97.63 INSTRUCTOR PMT 152509 838,50 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152510 673,60 INSTRUCTOR PNT 152511 3.987,55 INSTRUCTOR pAYMENT ISZ512 30,60 CALBO ABM MEETING 152513 30°00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152514 93.91 OFFXCEIMAZNTENANCE EQUIPMENT I 152515 7,163.83 MAINTENANCE $UPPLXES t 152516 294.16 CZTT OF RANCNU CUCANONGA LEST OF MARRANTS FOR PER10D: 06-07-00 (99/003 RUN DATE: OOIO71OO PAGE: Z ENOOR NAME ZTEN DESCRZPTZON WARN NO NANRo ANT. 69 CHAPFEV JOXNT,UNZON HoSe DZSTRXCT 6052 CHARTER CONHUNXCATXON5 ZZO45 CMRXSP COMPANY 74 CXTY RENTALS 945 CLARK. KAAEN 3006 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 5607 CONEZNED MARTEAL 5CXENCE 21035 COMMERCZAL NOOD pR0DUCTS COMPANY 643 COMPUTERLAND E362 CONSERCOe ZNC. 85 CUCAMONGA CO NATER DZST 6495 D & J FOOTHELL ELECTRZCAL 4488 DAGHDEVERZANe KATHY 105 DAN GUERRA & ASSOCZATES 61280 DEANE°S 60 DELTA OENTAL 107 DETCO 276 OZETZ TOMZNG 5666 DP SOLUTEONE. ZNCo 5788 DUFFTe RXCK/USKO 41281 EAGLE ROOFEND & CONSTRUCTZON 6536 EASTER, PANELA 3366 EZGHTN AVENUE GRAPHZCS 41282 ELLZOTT ACCOUNTANCY CORPot pETER 5613 EMPZRE REPROGRAPHZCS 5262 EVANS SPDRTXNG GOODS 229 EWZNG ZRRKGATZON PRODUCTS 186 FZELDNANe ROLAPP G ASSOCXATES 3088 FZRST STOP MOTORSPORTS, ZNCo 61283 FLONAX PRODUCTS. 2NC. 4058 FORBES 41287 FULLHER CONSTEUCT XDN 6232 GADABOUT TOURS, XNC 6590 GERZ°S SCREENPRINTING 5502 GXORDANO, MARlANNA 61288 GZURBZNQ, NZKE 650 GRAZNGER, 61286 GRAY [NC., DAVZD R. 3827 GREEN ROCK PONER EQUIPNENT ~1185 GRUBB & ELLXS CONPANT 137 GTE CALXPORNIA 41Z86 GUJRAL CoPoA-t ROBERT 6666 H & H GENERAL CONTRACTORS 6127 HANGER 18 1246 HAVEN BUZLDXNG RATERZAL$ 3334 NEZLZGe KELLY 5460 HZDALGD. CARLO 32056 HZLLSXDE COVE ,,.,.~58 HOLLZDAT ROCK CO.s ZNCo RENTAL - AUDXTORZUN RoC.H.S. ADVERTXSZNG FEE OVERPAYMENT EQUZPMENT RENTALISUPPLZE$ ZNSTRUCTOR PAYNENT EQUXPNENT RENTAL ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 6USZNEES LZCENSE REFUND COMPUTER NAXNTENANCE/SUPPLZES $ERVZCE/REPAZRS MONTHLY NATER BZLLZNG$ PRDFESSZONAL $ERVlCES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CONTRACT $ERVXCES EUSINESS LXCENSE REFUND DENTAL ZNSURANCE OFFZCE SUPPLZES VEMZCLE TONZNG NAENTENANCE SUPPLIES XN$TRUCTOR PAYMENT 8USZNESS LZCEN$E REFUND TRAVEL i MEETENOS OPFZCE SUPPLZE$ DU$XNES$ LZCEN$E REFUND MAINTENANCE $UPPLXE$ RECREATZON SUPPLXES ZRRZGATZGN SUPPLZES pROFESSZONAL SERVXCE$ VEHZCLE MAINTENANCE BUSINESS LXCENSE REFUND SUBSCRIPTZON REFUND RECREATZON RECREATZON SUPPLEES ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES BUSZNESS LICENSE REFUNO MAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES 8USZNESS LXCENSE REFUND MONTHLY TELEPHONE BZLLINGS BUSINESS LXCENSE REFUND REZMBo MASTER PLAN STORM DRAZN BUSINES5 LZCENSE REFUND HAZNTENANCE SUPPLZE$ ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ZNSTRUCTOR pAyMENT RETMBURSEMENT OF OVERPMT. NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZES O0 CMECK5 OVERLAP 13251T lwO00.OO 152518 61,60 152519 15o00 I 152520 67.20 152521* 252.00 152512 213o95 35ZSZ3 h309,80 152526 90.00 152525 464.67 I 152526 ZegZO.96 152521 - 152526 I 1525Z5 12e469-96 152530 3,635.00 152531 577olz t ISZS)Z 61616000 15Z533 13.50 152536 16eZge. TZ 152535 25.86 152536 65.00 152537 1,160.00 152538 460.00 152539 42.66 I 152540 236.16 I 152561 436.18 152562 23.00 152543 106.67 152564 2,786.74 152565 580.78 152566 5~3ZZ.ZO I 152547 800.00 152566 7.00 152549 29°98 152550 85.50 e 15Z551 Z,TZZ,6O 152552 149.94 152553 165.60 152554 15,670.00 152555 212.68 152556 85,20 I 152551 19,85 152558 23.00 152559 - 15Z559 I 15Z560 Z,605.54 152561 22.50 152562 8e455.70 152563 ZO.O0 I 152564 293.29 152H, 5 978.57 152566 19ZoOO 1525(,7 2,550.00 R 15Z568 605.10 CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONG& LIST OF NARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-07-00 (99/00) RUN DRTE: 06107100 PAGEZ ENDOR NAHE ZTEN DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARRo AHTo 6587 HOLMES 6 NARVERe X NCo 2Z55 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC 2412 HOYTt RAYNONO 32126 ZANNONEt NARCZA 6633 IDENTIFICATION PRODUCT NFGo 908 INLAND NEOZAT10N BOARD 6202 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 2315 ZNLANO WHOLESALE NURSERY 3452 ZNTRAVAZA ROCK 6 SAND 2507 ZNVENSY$ BUILDING SYSTENS ZNC, 32528 J & J INTERIORS 32529 JAY ZNDECK PLUM81NG 6565 JOHNSON, CHARLOTTE 6559 JONES, JANES 5637 JONESw KEZTH 32531 KAISER PERHANENTE 6936 KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL. ZNCo 6329 KZNGt PATRICK 6090 KONGe SDPHAK 17Z KOZLOVICHt OEBBIE 193 LAIRD CONSTRUCTION CO 5216 LAG ROSAS - EMMA SORCZNZ 5886 LZLBURN CORPORATION 5274 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTEONS 6634 LQGAN'S CANDIES 1655 LONG'S DRUGS 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTLo 1062 M C I MORLDCOM 32325 MAGNATRON pRODUCTS CO, 6553 NAGRUDER, KAREN 47Z7 MARSHALL PLUNGING 4701 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 5560 NARVAC 6085 MCARDLE, KEREN 32495 NENOEZ, SUSAN 2198 MZCHAELS STORES ZNCo #3019 1020 HDUNTAEN VIEW GLASS & MIRROR 5755 NOUNTAZN VEER INLAND POOL 5552 HT HIGH ENTERTAINRENT 5552 MT HIGH ENTERTAINMENT 4573 N X G P 32526 NoB. LZOU COHPANY 2248 NAPA AI/~D PARTS 6609 NRTZONAL BUSINESS ZNFOBASE YA4 NATIONAL DEFERRED 32532 NAVARROe LUPE 5301 NEW NEST SIGNAL 32508 NEXONe PAN 32527 O'NEILL, D.P.M., 8RZAN 523 OFFICE DEPOT O0 CHECK8 OVERLAP RECREATION REFUND 152569 B,163o05 MAINTENANCE SUPPLXES 152570 134o69 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152571 759,30 NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 152572 268,15 SENS MEETING 152573 Z6Q.Z4 LANDLORD/TENANT DXSPUTE RESOLD I 152574 2,018o28 BUSXNESS LXCENSE REFUND 15251'5 610o00 NAXNTENANCE SUPPLXES I 15Z576 106,35 MAINTENANCE SUPPLXES 152577 225.00 SERVXCE/SUPPLZES I 152578 1,06Zo62 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152579 63°00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152580 33°79 SUBSCRIPTION RENENAL I 1BZ581 le560oO0 REFUND BUILDING PERMITS 152582 19Bo00 PROFESSIONAL SERVECES 15Z583 345,00 DEPDSIT REFUND 152586 1e000.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 152585 826°95 XNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152586 105.00 BUSINESS LXCENSE REFUND 152587 480.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 15Z588 Z,202.90 PROFESSIONAL SERVECE$ I 152589 03,594o55 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1SZSgO 199.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 152591 5,464°40 GRAPHIC DESIGNER 1S2592 AOoO0 REFUND PARKING CXTATXON 152593 116oT5 FZLN pROCESSING 15Z594 1ZoBA RECREATION SUPPLIES 152595 286.23 TELEPHONE SERVICES I 152596 659o01 BUSXNESS LXCENSE REFUND 15Z597 13.20 REGXSTRATXON FEE 152598 361o80 REHAGo PROGRAM I 152599 285°75 RECREATXON REFUND 152600 855,54 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 15260t 37,T0 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 352602 7.00 RECREATION 152603 39°00 RECREATXDN SUPPLEES 152604 70°65 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152605 12.11 HAXNTENANCE SUPPLXES 152606 45.04 RECREATXON 152607 ZSO.OO RECREATION 152608 ZeSOO,OO ANNUAL HENBERSHZP 152609 15OoO0 BUSXNESS LXCENSE REFUND 152610 14.05 VEHICLE HAXNTENANCE B 15Z611 110o71 RECREATION REFUND 152612 217.00 DEFERRED COMP 152613 2,33Z,00 PARKING CITATION REFUND 15261& 30.OO MAXNTENANCE 15261B 23,895o00 RECREATION 152616 35°00 BUSENESS LXCENSE REFUND 152617 90°00 ((( 152618 - 152618 OFFXCE SUPPLXES I 152619 IjZOI,65 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA LIST OF N&RRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-07-00 C99/00) RUN DATE: 06/07/00 PAGE: 6 ENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO MARR. AIR'. 5403 OFFICE MAX 6586 OLIVAe PHILIP 527 OLYMPIC STUDIOS 3964 ONTARID/CE SKATING CENTER 235 OMEN ELECTRIC 338 PACIFIC EQUZPT 6 ZRRZGATZONe ZNC. 5318 PARKERe SHANNON 5609 PARTSMASTER, ZNC. 487 PATTON SALES CORP. 757 PEP BOYS 4267 PETE'$ ROAD SERVICE 6148 PXRONe SHAUN 791 PHIlDELTA CARE 285 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 32530 POTQNAC MOTORS 693 PONERSTRZDE BATTERY CO.e ZNC. 758 PRAXAZR DZSTRZBUTZDNm INC. 6601 PRAXAZR DISTRIBUTION, ZNCo 5325 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 6399 PRENZER PERSONNEL 3E86 PRZNC[PAL LIFE 5556 QUALITY BOOKSm INCo 6569 QUZNNe $HERLZNE 251 R ~ R AUTONOTZVE 345 R D 0 EQUZPNENT CD/POWERPLAN 264 RALPHS GROCERT COMPANY 1Z528 RANCNO ENGINE MACHINE 6329 RANCHD TRANSNISSION SERVICE 5916 REXEL CALCDN ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 6518 RHYTNN ENTERTAINMENT 12529 RICHARDSONs KATRZNA 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 3316 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 16 ROTARY CORPORATION 6620 RVC ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION, ZNC. 6629 RVC ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION. ZNC. 12530 RYANt EDMIN J.Ro 12531 SACRED HEABT PARISH SCHOOL 5536 SAN ANTONZONATERZALS 58~ SAN BERN COUNTY 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COt ZNC 6604 $CHNEZDERe DANIEL 3896 SENECHAL, CAL 2185 SETON IDENTIFICATION PRODUCTS 1829 SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECONe ZNC 5950 SNESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES 6252 SIERRA SPRINGS 1327 SMART 6 FINAL 135 SO CALZF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDeZNC lZ532 $ORRELLe JODZ ** CHECKE OVERLAP OFFICE SUPPLIES 152620 43°09 RECREATION REFUND 152621 1ZO,O0 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1526EZ 2,805o00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152623 672,00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 15Z6Z4 5o19 MAINTENANCE SUPPLEES I 1526Z5 196,32 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152626 206.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 152621 632.S6 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152628 639,43 VEHICLE MAENTENANCE SUPPLIES 152629 63°36 VEHICLE SERVICE 6 SUPPLIES 15Z630 647.50 CONTRACT SERVICES 152631 186.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE 152632 19154.98 VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE& SUPPLIES 152633 1e936.58 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 352636 ZZ.50 VEHICLE NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 152635 Z/RiB MAZNTIRECREATZON SUPPLIES t 152636 156o57 EQUZPNENT RENTAL 15Z63T 151.80 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152638 516.70 RECREATION REFUND 152635 569°45 MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE 15Z660 74,416.57 LIBRARY SUPPLIES t 15264'3 ZeO82.51 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND I 1526~Z 367.50 VEHICLE NAZNTeSUPPLZES&SERVZCE 15Z663 71,36 MAZNT SUPPLIES I 152666 1,951o05 RECREATION SUPPL/ES I 152645 101.80 RECREATION REFUND 152646 5°58 BOND FUNDING 152667 2e035o29 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES I 152648 270.94 RECREATION REFUNDS 152669 7eATO°O0 RECREATION REFUND 152650 23.00 PRINTS e 15265t 11146.36 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES I 152652 6Ol,EZ NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 152653 51,52 RECREATION REFUND 152654 136~359.89 RECREATION REFUND 152655 39e125.68 RECREATION REFUND I 152656 60°00 RECREATION REFUND 152657 ZOO,OO NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES R 152658 143.39 CAL-ZD pROGRAM 15Z659 1ZtSO0.O0 MAZNT SUPPLIES I 152660 480.40 RECREATION REFUND 152661 69.08 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT e 152662 193o50 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152663 183o07 TELEPHDNE SERVICES I 15Z6~4 2e535.76 ANNUAL/TST/IMP 15Z66S 346.95 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152666 114.00 DAY CARP SUPPLIES · 152667 366,84 REGISTRATION 152668 200o00 RECREATION REFUND 152669 16,55 (C( 152670 - 152677 CZTY OF RANCHO CUCARONGA LZST OF MARRANTS FaR PERIOD: 06-07-00 (99100) RUN DATE: 06/07/00 PAGES ENDOR NANE ITEM DESCRIPTZQN WARR NO WARRo AMTo 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12533 SOUTHNEST FINISH A SUPPLY, 6176 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 2867 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL MONT., INC. 3597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1516 STOVER SEED COMPANY 6733 SUNRISE FORD 5A10 T ~ D INSTALLATIONS 236A TARGET 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 12535 TAYLOR, HONDI 6159 TECHNOLOGY SERVICES CONSULTING GRP 3962 TERN[NiX iNTERNATIONAL 12536 TERRY'S BURGER RESTAURANT Z7~8 TERRY, ODNNA lZ537 THEZRRY MASONRY, R.Go 1919 TOMARK SPORTS INCo 1Z536 TOVAR, ROSZE 3388 TRUGREEN - LANDCARE REGIONAL ASS8 U S GUARDS CODe INC. 6788 UNDERGROUND SVC° ALERT OF SO. CALIF 3437 UNIFZRST UNZFORN SERVICE 5601 UNIQUE HANAGENENT SERVICES, ZNC. 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 6606 UPLAND TENNIS CLUB 12538 VAN AKEN iNTERNATIONAL 6398 VENTURA, LOUIS 6220 WAL-MART 6575 WASHER ~NDUSTRY PARTS 213 WAXZE, KLEEN-L[NE CORP 399 WEST VALLEY VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT ZlZ WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 6265 R-PRESS PRESS 6635 TELLOg FREGHT 1510 ZETTERBERG, BOB O0 CHECKI OVERLAP MONTHLI ELECTRIC 8ZLL$ I 152678 52t320.6Z RECREATION REFUND 15Z679 166oZ9 HAZARDOUS NASTE DISPOSAL t 152680 162,36 SERVICE AND SUPPLIES I 15Z681 leE09.00 ANNUAL RENT-TRANSFER SITE 152682 19,00 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 25Z683 66Zo00 AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES 152686 25°86 SUPPLIES 152685 167o56 YOUTH PROGRAN& DAY CANP $UPPL 192686 90.00 MAXNT SUPPLIES 152687 i,526.78 DEPOSIT REFUND 152688 60.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152689 9e088. ZO MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE ! 152690 9IT. DO DEPOSIT REFUND 15Z691 23.00 iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152692 186.30 RECREATION REFUND 152693 90,OO MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152696 19.60 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 152695 35,00 <(( 15Z696 - 152696 >)) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 152697 126,010o35 SECURITY GUARD SERVICE 15Z698 11029°03 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 15Z699 235,75 UNIFORM SERVICES I 152700 405°35 MANAGEMENT SERVICES ISZTO1 382.60 UPS SERVICE 15270Z 63°09 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 152703 1,262.60 RECREATION REFUND 15Z706 39°57 iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 15ZTOS 201o60 RECREATION REFUND 15Z706 53,31 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 152707 311o96 NAINT SUPPL/ES I 152708 1.313,18 VECTOR CONTROL SERVICES 15ZTO9 16,053o95 PROFESSIONAL SERVZCES 152710 160o00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND I 152711 63.86 RECREATION REFUND 1$2712 ZOA°BT REIMBURSEMENT 15Z713 107.91 TOTAL 751,616,12 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May 31, 2000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Par Market Book Investments Value Value Value Certificates of Deposit - Bank 1,500,000,00 1 ~500,000.00 1.500,000.00 Local Agency Investment Funds 26,652,734,15 26,652,734.15 26,652,734.15 Certificates of Deposit/Nag. - Bank 3,325,532,00 3,325,532.00 3,325,532.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 72,000,000,00 69,317,187.50 71,964,843.75 Treasury Securities - Coupon 8,000,000,00 7,928,12500 7,969,687.50 Mortgage Backed Securities 53,926.01 54,62863 50,392.40 Investments 111,532, 192.16 108,778,207.28 111,463, 189.80 Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 605,486.20 605,486.20 605~486.20 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 3,945.00 3,945.00 Subtotal 609,431.20 609,431.20 Total Cash and Investments 112, 137,678.36 109,387,638.48 1 t 2,072,621.00 Total Earnings May 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 557.391.50 5,494,877.32 Average Daily Balance 111,542,490.55 102,430,730.53 Effective Rate of Return 5.88% 5.83% % of Days to YTM YTM Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equlv. 365 Equiv. 1,35 370 4 5,350 5.424 23.91 I 1 5932 6.014 2.98 365 184 6,182 6.268 64,56 1,701 1,143 5.767 5,847 7,15 726 349 5.688 5.767 0.05 7,891 3.191 9,764 9.899 100.00% 1,170 770 5.809 6.890 1 1 1 973 2.000 1,170 770 5.809 5.890 I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 20, 1999. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month~nd market values were obtained from (IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cas stments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents Run Date: 06/13/2000 - 18:58 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Certificates of Deposit - Bank 6385XINCO 01048 RATIONSBANK NA Subtotal and Average Local Agency Investment Funds 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 1,500,000.00 Subtotal and Average 26,152,734.15 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 06050EJG1 1061 BANK OF AMERICA 06050EAR6 01055 NATIONSBANK NA Subtotal and Average 3,325,532.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RAA3 00988 31331RDX0 00996 31331RMS1 01002 3133IRMA0 01004 31331RUG8 01022 31331R065 01036 31331R2Y0 01042 31331R306 01045 '31331R4R3 01046 31331R7E9 01052 3133M2US4 01003 3133M6NE4 01035 3133M7504 01038 3133M86L3 01043 3133MBB78 01044 3133M94J8 01050 3133M9501 01051 3133M96K3 01053 3133MgCG5 01054 3133MARK7 1059 3133MBHV2 1062 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL ROME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2000 Purchase Oat~ Par Value Market Value BookValue 06/0111999 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000+00 1,500,000,00 1,500,000.00 t,500,000.00 26,652,734.15 26,652,734.15 26,652,734, 15 26,652,734.15 26,652,734.15 26,652,734.15 03/15/2000 1,810,532.00 1,810,532.00 1,810,532.00 08/03/1999 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 3,325,532.00 3,325,532.00 3,325,532.00 03/2711997 2,000,000,00 1,980,625.00 2,000,000.00 07/1711997 2,000,00000 1,961,250.00 1,999,375.00 01/0711998 1,000,000,00 975,000.00 1,000,0O0,00 01105/1998 2,000,000,00 1,948, 125.00 2,000,000.00 05/2711998 2,000,000.00 1,940,000,00 1,999.375,00 12/1511998 2,000,000.00 1,890,000.00 2,000,000,00 0311611999 3,000,000.00 2,848,125.00 3,000,000.00 04/07/1999 2,000,000.00 1,920,625.00 1,997,500.00 04/28/1999 4,000,000.00 3,782,500.00 3,997,500.00 06/21/1999 2,000.000.00 1,966,250.00 2,000,000.00 01106/1998 1,000,000.00 972,500.00 1,000,000.00 12/08/1998 2,000,000.00 1.882,500.00 2,000,000.00 0112t/1999 1,000,000.00 938,750.00 1,000,000,00 03/23/1999 3.000,000.00 2,901,562.50 3,000,000,00 04/06/1999 2,000,000.00 1,883,125.00 2,000,000.00 05/17/1999 3,000,000.00 2,878,125.00 2,984,531.25 05/21/lS99 2,000,000.00 1,956,875.00 1,999,375.00 06128/1999 2,000,000.00 1,926,875.00 1,996,875.00 07113/1999 1.000,000.00 987,812.50 1,0Q0,000.00 02/25/2000 2,000,000.00 1,976,250.00 1,999,687.50 05125/2000 2,000,000.00 1,995.625.00 1,994,375.00 06/25/1997 3,000,000.00 2,968,12500 3,000,000,00 15/22/1997 2.000,000,00 1,953,750.00 2,000,000.00 08/2011998 2,000,000.00 1,919,375.00 2,000,000.00 Page 2 Stated YTM Daysto Maturity Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date 5.350 5.350 4 06/0512000 5.350 4 6.014 5.932 1 5.932 I 6.560 6.560 287 03/1512001 5,730 5.730 62 08/02J2000 6.182 184 6.620 6.240 6.330 6.220 6.290 5.660 5.930 5.850 5.850 6,375 6,230 5.530 5.510 5.755 5.700 6.230 6.150 6.480 6.529 664 03/27/2002 6.162 776 07/17/2002 6,243 950 01/07/2003 6.135 949 01/06/2003 6.211 1,090 05/27/2003 5,582 1,292 12/15/2003 5.849 1,384 03/16/2004 5.805 1,040 04/07/2003 5.784 1.42~ 04/2712004 6.288 750 05/21/2002 6.145 949 01/06/2003 5.454 1,285 12/08/2003 5,435 1,329 01/21/2004 5.676 844 09/23/2002 5+622 1,405 04/06/2004 0.000 1,477 06/17/2004 6.077 750 06/2112002 6.428 1,488 05/2812004 5.957 407 07/1312001 6.910 999 02/25/2003 7.850 1,810 05/15/2005 6.537 602 01124/2002 6.233 873 10/22/2002 5.967 1,175 08/20/2003 PO~fOiiO CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5 01f CUSIP Investment# Issuer Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3134A2XJ2 01033 3134A2N20 01037 3134A3NS1 01047 31364FC33 01016 31364FG96 01018 31364GBE8 01032 31364GJM2 01034 31364GTJ8 01039 Subtotal and Average Treasury Securities - Coupon 9128274M1 01026 9128275H1 01049 9128275X6 1058 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401VWN7 31360BJ21 36215WX74 36215XZS4 Average Balance FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 70,872,424.40 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 3t, 2000 Purchase Date Par Value BOOk Value 11124/1998 2,000,000.00 1,898,750.00 2,000,000.00 01/14/1999 2,000,000.00 1,916,875.00 2,000,000.00 05104/1999 5,000,000.00 4,734,375.00 5,000,000.00 05101/1998 3,000,000.00 2,907,187.50 3,000,000.00 05/19/1998 2,000,000.00 1,931,250.00 2,000,000.00 10/06/1998 2,000,000.00 1,896,250.00 2,000,000.00 12/01/1998 2,000,000.00 1,883,750.00 2,000.000,00 02/11/1999 4,000,000.00 3,795,000+00 3,996,250,00 72,000,000.00 69,317,187.50 7t,964,843.75 TREASURY NOTE 08/03/1998 2,000,000.00 1,998,125.00 1,996,250.00 TREASURY NOTE 06/09/1999 4,000,000.00 3,942,500.00 3,977,500.00 TREASURY NOTE 01/31/2000 2,000,000.00 1,987,500.00 1,995,937.50 Subtotal and Average 1,969,687.50 8,000,000.00 7,928,t25.00 7,969,681.50 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP, 02/23/1987 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 09/15/1987 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 06/23/1986 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 05123/1986 Subtotal and Average 51,190.82 Total Investments and Average 109,871,568.87 3,878.32 4,006.73 3,949.71 45,396.54 46,024.83 41,935.05 3,986.03 4,025.65 3,931,22 565,12 571,42 576,42 53,926.01 54,628.63 50,392.40 111,532,192.16 108,778,207.28 1tl,463,189.80 Page 3 Stated YTM Days to Maturity Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date 5.790 5.711 1,271 11124/2003 5.600 5.523 957 01/1412003 5.900 5.819 1,433 05/04/2004 6280 6.194 1,068 05/05/2003 6,125 6.041 1,082 05/19/2003 5.670 5.592 1,222 10106/2003 5.520 5.444 1,278 12/01/2003 5.860 5.801 1.350 02/11/2004 5.767 1,143 5375 5,400 60 07/31/2000 5.250 5.478 364 05/31/2001 6,375 6.396 609 01/31/2002 5.688 349 8.000 8.219 579 0110112002 8.500 10,018 3~744 09/0112010 8.500 8.778 348 05/15/2001 9.000 8,547 287 03/15/2001 9.764 3,191 5.809 770 Run Date: Crd13/2c00 - 18:58 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2} SymRept V5.01f CUSIP Cash Accounts Average Balance 1,670,921.68 111,542,490.55 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash May 31, 2000 Purchase Date ParValue MarketValue 605,486.20 Cash ACcount Total A~crued Interest at Purchase 3,945.00 Subtotal 609,431.20 112,137,678.36 109,387,638.48 Page 4 Stated YTM Days to BOok Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity 605,486.20 2.000 1.973 1 605,486.20 1 3,945.00 609,431.20 112,072,621.00 5.809 770 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V501f CUSIP Investment# Issuer Certificates of Deposit - Bank Subtotal Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type May 1, 2000 through May 31, 2000 Beginning Stated Transaedon Purchases Balance Rate Date or Deposits 00005 Subtotal Checking/Savings Accounts (Monthly Summary} 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal Certificates of DeposiUNeg, - Bank FedemlAgencylssues-Coupon 3133MBHV2 1062 31364CJ58 00992 Treasury Securities - Coupon Mortgage Backed Secudties 3134011NW7 00071 31360BJ21 00203 36215WX74 00002 36215XZS4 00069 1,500,000.00 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 23,652,734.15 1,517,986.20 Subtoil 3,325,532.00 6.014 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 2.000 3,546,500.00 3,546,500.00 Sales/Maturities or Withdrawals 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,459,000.00 4,459,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 7.890 05/25/2000 1,994,375.00 0.00 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 7,070 05/0812000 0.00 2.000.000,00 Subtotal 71,970,468.75 1,994,375.00 2,000,000.00 Subtotal 7,969,687.50 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 8.000 05/1512000 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 8.500 05/25/2000 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 8.500 05/15/2000 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 9.000 05/1512000 Subtotal 5t,872.45 Total t09,988,281.05 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,540,875.00 468.90 403.04 539.85 68.26 1,480.05 8,460,480.05 Page 5 Ending Balance 1,500,000.00 26,652,734.15 605,486.20 3,325,532.00 1t,964,843.75 7,969,687.50 50,392.40 112,068,676.00 Run Date: 06/13/2C00 - 18:58 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM3) SymRept V501f City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended April 30, 2000 Bond Issue Assessment District No 93-1 Masi Plaza Trustee and/or Pa¥inq Aqent US Bank Purchase Account Name Investment Date Imppzmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 Reserve Fund Cash N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/97 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A Maturity Date N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A N/A Yield Cost Value 5.20% $ 252,595.00 N/A 0.34 5.20% 244,709.00 N/A 0.30 5.20% 11,041.00 N/A 0.45 $ 508,346,09 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 Cash N/A Sub Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 Cash N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 Cash N/A Redemption Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/99 Cash N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/00 Cash N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A 5.20% $ 25,978.00 N/A 0,28 5.20% 599,818.00 N/A 0.57 5.20% 1,126,831.00 N/A 0.84 5.20% 13,001,00 N/A 0.16 5.20% 88,819.00 N/A 0.44 $ 1,854,449.29 $ 2,362,795.38 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENT5 * Note: These investments are money markets accounts which have no stated maturity date due to their liquidity. klfinance~Cash with Fiscal Agents,xls 5/31/00 11:38AM T H IQ. ANCHO ~:= CITY OF CUCAMONGA Stuff Report DATE: June 21, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 28-4333-9835 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for Foundation Improvements for Rehabilitation of the Isle House, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Isle House was relocated out of the right-of-way for the Foothill Freeway and will be rehabilitated through a cooperative effort with the Etiwanda Historical Society for use as a community building/museum similar to that of the Chaffey-Garcia House. The proposed project will provide for foundation improvements for the structure and various site improvements including, concrete sidewalks, concrete handicapped parking spaces, concrete curbs, and aggregate base for the driveway and remainder of the parking area. HMC Architects prepared and donated the Foundation Plans, and staff completed the bid specifications. The cost estimate for the completion of foundation and site improvements ranges from $37,000 to $52,000. This figure does not include a contingency, or costs associated with advertising or printing. The proposed project is funded from CDBG funds (Account No. 28-4333-9835). Legal advertising is scheduled for June 27, 2000, and July 4, 2000, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 25, 2000. City Planner BB:TG:Is Attachments: Resolution and Vicinity Map RESOLUTION NO. 00- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City or Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City or Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS This project is federally financed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (24 CFR Part 57) for the purpose of providing rehabilitation improvements to an historic structure and is subject to certain requirements including the payment of federal prevailing wages, compliance with "Section 3 - Affirmative Action Requirements," Executive Order No. 11246, and others. The aforementioned are described in the "Special Federal Provisions" section of the bid documents. Additional information pertaining to the federal requirements is on file with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 25, 2000, sealed bids or proposals for "FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. CITYCOUNCIL RESOLUTION FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE June 21,2000 Page 2 Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE." A mandatory job-walk meeting will be held on Thursday, July 13, 2000, at 2:00 p.m., at 7086 Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739. Bidders' attendance at this meeting is a prerequisite for demonstrating an informed knowledge of project improvements. All prime Contractors are required to have a representative attend and sign in at the job-walk meeting. Failure to comply with this attendance and sign-in requirement will result in the Bidder's proposal being found non-responsive to the required bid procedures. At the job-walk meeting, project improvement requirements will be explained to facilitate completion of the foundation improvements. A mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held on Tuesday, July 18, 2000, at 2:00 p.m., at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center, Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. This meeting is to inform Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) of subcontracting and material supply opportunities. Bidders' attendance at this meeting is a prerequisite for demonstrating reasonable efforts to obtain DBE participation. All prime Contractors are required to have a representative attend and sign in at the pre-bid meeting. Failure to comply with this attendance and sign-in requirement will result in the Bidder's proposal being found non-responsive to the required bid procedures. At the pre-bid meeting, Section 3 requirements will be explained to facilitate completion of the required Section 3 documents in the bid proposal. Award of the project will be contingent on the content of these Section 3 documents. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin, in consideration of the award. MINIMUM WAGE RATE: Notice is hereby given that this project is funded with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funds and that the rate of wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic employed under this contract shall not be less than as specified under the U.S. Department of Labor General Wage Decision in the locality in which the work is to be performed as modified with ten (10) days prior to the bid opening date as required under the Davis-Bacon Act. Notwithstanding the conditions herein above, the California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, stipulates that not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft of type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the contract in CITYCOUNCIL RESOLUTION FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE June 21,2000 Page 3 the locality in which the work is to be performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California shall be paid to all workmen employed. Where a discrepancy exists between the federal and state prevailing wage rates the policy of the California Department of Labor is to require that the higher of the two prevailing wage rates shall apply. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one (1) to five (5) except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of fifteen percent (15%) in the ninety (90) days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one (1) to five (5), or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least one-thirtieth (1/30) of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE June 21, 2000 Page 4 When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one (1) apprentice to eight (8)journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-of~cio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the proper~y of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE June 21,2000 Page 5 If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. BONDS: The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and time of the submittal of the Bidder's proposal, the Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "B" License (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Planner, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of thirty-five dollars ($35.00), said thirty-five dollars ($35.00) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-reimbursable payment of fifteen dollars ($15.00) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. CITYCOUNCIL RESOLUTION FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE June 21,2000 Page 6 The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 21st day of June, 2000 PUBLISH DATES: June 27, 2000, and July 4, 2000 CITYCOUNCIL RESOLUTION FOUNDATION IMPROVEMENTS FOR REHABILITATION OF THE ISLE HOUSE June 21,2000 Page 7 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 21sT DAY OF JUNE, 2000. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of June, 2000. Executed this 21st day of June, 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Isle House Relocation Site SADDLERIDGE m Southcrr Pacific Railroad U Isle !louse Relocation Site 7086 Etiwa ida Ave 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Feet N C H 0 CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT S Report DATE: June 21, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Supervisor APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR CORPORATE YARD, PHASE II/VqAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $495,000.00 ($450,000.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 01-4648-7043 FOR THE REFERENCED PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of the warehouse portion of Corporate Yard, Phase II and associated improvements and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." It is also recommended that the City Council approve the appropriation of $495,000.00 for this subject project from account 01-4648- 7043. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Continuing with the Master Plan for the Corporate Yard that was developed in 1986, the Phase II component was revised in 1999 and it was determined that a warehouse is needed to compensate for the expanding storage requirements for City departments. Engineer's estimate for this project is $495,000. City Engineer WJO:DC:dlw RESOLUTION NO.' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CORPORATE YARD, PHASE II/WAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Cotmoil be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "Corporate Yard, Phase II/Warehouse Construction". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby, authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council will receive at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ON OR BEFORE THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON JULY 26, 2000, sealed bids or proposals for "CORPORATE YARD, PHASE II/WAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Califomia, marked, "BID FOR CORPORATE YARD, PHASE IINqAREHOUSE CONSTRUCTION". A Pre-Bid Job Walk is scheduled for Tuesday, July 11, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. at the Corporate Yard, 9153 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, where bidders may present questions regarding the Bid Documents: Plans, Proposals, Specifications. THIS MEETING IS MANDATORY. Verification of attendance at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be documented by signing in at the meeting. Any bidder not documented as being present at the Pre-Bid Job Walk will be excluded from the bid process. Resolution No. Page 2 2. 3. 4. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provision of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Resolution No. Page 3 Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be govemed by the laws of the State of Califomia having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies fumished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to fumish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a "Class A" (General Engineering). In accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Califomia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Resolution No. Page 4 The Contractor, pursuant to the California Business and Professions Code, Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non- reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for Corporate Yard, Phase II/Warehouse Construction may be directed to: Dale Catron, Facilities Supervisor 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2700, ext. 4090 By order of the City Council of the City ofRaneho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 21 st day of June 2000. ADVERTISE ON: June 27, 2000 and July 5, 2000 RANC HO CUCAMONGA E NGI N E E RI N G D E PARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21,2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Supervisor APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO REJECT THE SOLE BID FOR THE INSTALLATION OF RESTROOM PARTITIONS AT EIGHT CITY PARKS, TO BE FUNDED FROM FUNDS 40, 41, 43 AND 47. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council reject the sole bid as non-responsive for installation of restroom partitions at eight city parks. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 8, 2000, for the subject project. RAMA Construction was the sole bidder, with a bid amount of $36,452.00. This amount was in excess of the budgeted amount. Staff recommends at this time that the City Council reject the bid as non-responsive to the needs of the city. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DC:dlw THE CITY 0 F ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Tamara L. Layne REALLOCATION OF FUNDING SOURCE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPUTER SOFTWARE, HARDWARE AND CONTRACT SERVICES RECOMMENDATION Approve the reallocation of the funding source for the Community Development Departmenrs approved Tidemark permit tracking system and the related hardware and contract services to the Community Development Department cost center. BACKGROUND The Tidemark permit tracking system and related hardware and contract services were approved by Council on April 19, 2000. Staff is requesting that Council change the fund appropriation to merely reflect the Community Development Department cost center. There is no modification to the amount of approved funding. Unappropriate Appropriate 74-4225-3950 (Computer Software) 74-4225-6028 (Contract Services) 74-4225-7047 (Computer Equip.) R<~/pe submitted, Ri 3k C ment Director $174,000 01-4313-3950 $174,000 $195,000 01-4313-6028 $195,000 $22,500 01-4313-7047 $22,500 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY ~ERVICE~ TO: FROM: BY: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II June 21,2000 Approval of a Request for a Park Reservation Fee Waiver from Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America to hold their Cub Scout Day Camp at Red Hill Community Park on July 10-14, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the attached request for a fee waiver from the Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of America for use of two picnic shelters and the amphitheatre at Red Hill Community Park for their annual Cub Scout Camp scheduled to take place July 10-14, 2000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: City staff has received a request from the Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of Amedca for a fee waiver for the use of 2-picnic shelters and the amphitheatre (Friday use only) at Red Hill Park for the Council's annual Cub Scout Day Camp that is scheduled to take place July 10-14, 2000. The Council has used Red Hill for the past nine years for their annual Cub Scout Day Camp. They have indicated that in the past they have only had to charge their participants a nominal fee to attend the Camp to cover their costs for food and program supplies. Approximately 75-100 boys generally participate in the Camp with more than 75% of the participants for this particular Camp coming from Rancho Cucamonga. Traditionally there has not been a charge to reserve picnic shelters at Red Hill Park. Starting last year the City implemented a modest usage fee for reserving certain City park picnic shelters. The impact of such a fee to the Council would amount to a charge J7 CII'I' COUNCIL OLD BALDY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FEE WAIVER JUNE 21,2000 of $391 dollars for use of 2-picnic shelters for 5-days and use of the amphitheatre for 1- day. Due to nature of the event being planned for the site and non-profit status of the Council and the high quality program being provided for a predominately Rancho Cucamonga audience, it is staffs recommendation that the City Council approve the request for a fee waiver from Old Baldy Council Boy Scouts of Amedca. Respe ~ sliest, Kevin cArdie Community Services Director Attachment ~:tC~MMSERV~C~unci~&B~n~stCib/C~unciASta~Rep~ftst~dBa~dyC~unci~FeeWaivenc~edHi~P~rk6.21.~d~c -2- OLD BALDY COU IC L ¢ SCOUTS OF ERICA May 25, 2000 Mr. Kevin McArdle Director of Community Services City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. McArdle: I am writing to request the fees associated with using Redhill Park and the two covered areas by the amphitheater be waived. We have been using Redhill Park for the past nine years for oar Cub Scout Day Camp. We try to charge oar participants only what it will cost for food and program supplies. We do not have money set aside to pay for park rentals. We have approximately 75 to 100 boys participating, with more than 75% from Rancho Cucamonga. We do not want to pass the extra cost onto them. We have reserved the park for July 10th through the 14th. We nm Cub Scout day camp from 9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. We are always conscientious about cleaning up after ourselves and leaving things in good order. The Boy Scouts have a history of leaving places better than they are found. Please consider our request. The youth and adults of Rancho Cucamonga participating in Cub Scout Day Camp appreciate using Redhill Park each year. The boys look forward to day camp. It would be difficult for us to provide a high quality program if we had to pay a rental fee. Please help us keep our costs minimal so we can do more for the youth of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland. Please call me with any questions. Sincerely, Helen Pelkey ~/ District Director Trails End District 1047 West SLxlh St On/ado CA 91762-1233 Tel: 909-9834534 Fax: 909-984-0064 77 YEARS OF BUILDING CHARACTER IN YOU~IX4 RANC HO C UCA MONGa CCMMUI~IT¥ -~ERVICE~ TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II June 21,2000 Approval of a Free Youth Baseball Clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on July 7, 2000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a free youth baseball clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on July 7, 2000 and waive associated fees and charges. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received a request from Valley Baseball Inc. to hold a free youth baseball clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on Friday, July 7, 2000. The Clinic would be held in cooperation with McDonald's Basebailers Against Drugs (BAD) and underwritten by the McDonald's Operators' Association of Southern California. The Clinic is proposed to be a 2~ - hour program that focuses on both the improvement of youngsters' baseball and life skills. The clinic will be run by ex-Los Angeles Dodger Derrell Thomas. Six Quakes players are anticipated to assist with the clinic. The clinic will be open to both boys and girls ranging in age between 7 and 14 years of age. Featured activities include interactive pitching, batting and fielding instruction, plus inspirational messages, questions and answers with big leaguers and an autograph session. The clinic will be free of charge to the youngsters and can accommodate approximately 150-200 children. Staff recommends that City Council consider the waiver of fees associated with the proposed free youth baseball clinic as the event directly supports the City's intent for Valley Baseball Club Inc. to host programs at the Epicenter with themes such as 'say no to drugs' and 'stay in school' for the youngsters of our community, FISCAL IMPACT: The fisG Keyin ~ ~impact to the 'ty for the waiver of fees associated with this event will total ully sum' '.Ardle Commuhity Services Director $2,250. ~tC~MMSERV~C~ur~&B~ards~Ci~C~unci~Sta~Rep~rts~QuakesY~ut~Baseba~C~inic6~21~d~c }!:IAR. B0. 1001) I:23PM QUA.KES BASEBALL 90}-481 500!, NO. 74i;~ P. i March 30, 2000 To: Kevin McArdle From: Pat Filippone RE: Charity Baseball Clinic Mr. Bill Kolberg approached me about staging a.,~- baseball clinic at the Epicenter. I would be interested in partnering with him on this venture. I have enclosed the outline of the program from him. Can you let me know what ! need to do to get this done at the Epicenter? Thank you for your help. Rzncho Cucamonga Quakes Professional Basaball Club · 8408 Rochestez Ave ° EO. Box 4139 · Rancho Cucamonga CA 91739 Administration (909) 481-5000 · Ticket Office (909) 481-5252 · Fax (909) 481-5005 83 31-89 12:25 RECEIVED FROM:9894815895 P.81 McDonald' s Basebailers A ainst Dru s Youth Clinic The McDonald's Operators' Association of Southern California, coml~ised of all franchi. sea and company-owned restaurants within the Southern California five-county area, has purchased a sponsonhip package forthe upcoming Cl~s A Callfomia League season throogh Oasis Sports Marketing. With a lonbstanding philosophy of "giving .back m the community," we are seeIcing to extend this rnark~ting opportunity to incorporate a one-day youth baseball clinic at each of the five local league l~am venuas. Wha_~: An approximately 2 ~i-hour clinic focused upon both improving kids' baseball and life skills, this activity is hosted by the members of Basebsllea-s Against Drngs (BAD) and actually led by former major Iesgue players. The clinics ar~ open to all boys and gifts, ranging in age betwe~:n 7 and 14 ye~s of age. (Actual participation is only limited to venue capacity, but we typically host up to 300.) lea activities include interactive pi~ching, batting and fielding instruction, plus inspirational messages, Q &: A with the "big leaguers" and an autograph Session. .Vq31o:. Baseballors Against Drags, headquarterecl in the Simi Valley, is a non-profit orgaruzation found~cl by lira Dantoua_ Ite and his stiff and fB]low members, including Tommy Davis, Lee I.a~y and honorary chairman l~mle Banks, have been hosting elihies around the Country for boys and gifts of all ages. Their massage is "stay in school, stay out of gangs and stay offof drugs_,0 Each clinic is typically complemented b/inclusion of from two-to-four m=mbe, rs of the host baseball team. The McDonald' s Operators' Association of Southern California has men than 550 restaurants in Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, San Bomardino and Pdv~'rsidc counties. including local stor~ operarions in proximity to each of the five California League teams. When: The ideal clinic would be held on a Saturday (l:~fore schools r~c¢~es for the summer) or any weekday during the summer. However, we always try to arrange our .scheduling to best integrate the program with your tcam's schedule. How: Onc~ a time and dan: is mutually agr~d upon, McDonalct's pllblic relations agency (Porter Novelli) works with BAD to secure the clinic hosts, scout the venue, develop the agearia, contact local youth organizations (or work with the team to promote open sign-,,ps and/or ellhie awareness), underwrite the clinic costS and implement the c]iaie. Additionally, Portea'Novelli would handle pro- and post~elinic publicity through local radio and newspaint coverage. Additionally: If feasible---and as schedules permit---either a member of the local Mc,Donaid's organization and/or BAD could throw out the first ball a~ e home ~qm~ (prior to the elirile ate) in tan&m with apablic address anno,,ncemem about the clinic. A plaque will bc presented to a representative of the home team as host of th~ clinic by BAD and/or Me. Donald's, 30. 21)00 a 1: 23F'M'x° 44QUAKES B~SEEALL 909-{81 5005t NO. 7434 p. 2oo~ March 28, 2000 To: Fr: Mr. patFilippone, Gcneral Manager--Rancho Cucamonga Quakes Tel:3~04aTeue Bill Kolberg, S~nior Vieg President--Porter Novelli Re: McDonald's/BAD Youth Baseball Clinics Thanks for raking the time to share your interest in our proposed youth baseball clinics, hosted by Babebailers Against Drags and underw~uen by the McDonald's Operators' Association of Southern California- To provide you with further information, I have attached a fact sheet detailing the specific elements of our clinics. With this backgTound, I trust we can move forward with identifying a date and tim that may be mutually acceptable for accommodating this event. We will be working with the local IvleDonald's restaurants in Rancho Cucamonga ~o identify youth organizations with whom they have relationships, bat are receptive to also opening this clinic up to the community at-large, capacity penttilting. Ple~L~e call me directly with any questions, comments or suggestions. And, again, thanks for your interest. 193-31-88 12:25 RECEIVED FROM:g894815885 P.82 ~3 :7'.'. !. 211','lfi 4:CtlP'N( ;~IAI{ES ~:ASEBALL '}09-~;1 5005 li,~.. '}0711 P'. ':' June 9, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE Kevin McArdle City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Raneho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Kevin, I met wi~ Porter Novelli, representatives of BAD -~Baseballers Against Drugs, today in regard to the free b~seb~lt clinic at the Epicenter. The following ale He parameters and requests ichey have made of us: DaI9 - July 7, 2000 Time - 10:00 AM - 12:30 PM Location - Epicenter Baseball Reid Equipment Requested - One 2B batting prac-bce scr~n, one Screen for soft toss hi~ng, public address system, er~ message beam, Format - Will have 4 on field stains and one b~lllDen station, The camp will be run by ex- Los Angeles Dodger DerreU Thomas. Six Quakes player~ will assist with the camp- Expected attendance - '~ 50 -200 kids. Piease let me know if you need mere infon~nation:on the clinic. Thank you for ~rking with us on s~ging this event. ~ P F~lippone General Manager Administration (909) 481-5000 · Ticket (:)trice (909) 4.81 5252 · Fax (909) 481-5005 15:83 RECEIVED FROM:ge94815885 P-82 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~NGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRe rt DATE: TO:. June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Gary Vamey, Maintenance Superintendent APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE REPLACEMENT PURCHASE OF ONE MOBIL M-8A STREET SWEEPER FROM NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT COMPANY OF SANTE FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, THROUGH A PIGGY BACK COOPERATIVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 01-4647-7044 1N THE AMOUNT OF $135,000 AND UNAPPROPRIATE $135,000 FROM ACCOUNT 72-4225-7044 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City Council approve the appropriation of funds for the replacement purchase of one Mobil M-SA Street Sweeper from Nixon-Egli Equipment Company, of Santa Fe Springs, California. Through a piggy back cooperative purchase agreement with the City of Anaheim, California, funded from account 01-4647-7044 in the amount of $135,000.00. This item was originally budgeted in account 72- 4225-7044 for $235,000. Due to a change in the funding source for this item, staff is requesting these funds be unappropriated in Fund 72. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In January, staff began reviewing Street Sweeper specifications for a regenerative air Street Sweeper. After careful analysis staff recommended the replacement sweeper be a broom sweeper and specifically the Mobil M8-A broom sweeper because of its ability to work more effectively in heavy debris. Staff was able to find the best option and reached an agreement with the City of Anaheim and Nixon-Egli Equipment Company of Santa Fe Springs, California, through a piggy back/cooperative purchase agreement. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:GV:ju THE CITY OF DANClIO CUCAMONGA SlaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and City Council Members Jack Lam,AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste/NPDES Coordinator NEW DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the adoption and implement the NPDES Development/Redevelopment Guidelines. BACKGROUND In 1987, Congress amended the Clean Water Act to require the permitting of stormwater discharge, from municipal storm drain systems, under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated regulations in November 1990, to enact the new law. In the regulations, EPA listed the County of San Bernardino as a county that must obtain an NPDES permit. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board have been appointed by EPA to enforce these regulations in the State of Califomia and the Santa Ana River water shed. The Regional Board has required the unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County, the sixteen incorporated cities of the county within the Santa Ana River watershed, and the San Bemardino County Flood Control District, as permittees, to be included in the permit. The Permit requires the permittees to reduce, to the maximum extent practicable, the discharge of pollutants to the waters of the United States by the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs). The members of the NPDES General Committee recognized the sensitive issue of imposing development and construction BMPs on the building industry. Therefore a New DevelopmentIRedevelopment Sub-Committee was formed. This sub-committee sought insight and cooperation from the Building Industry Association, the development industry, the California Restaurant Association, and the Westem States Petroleum Association. CITY COUNCIL STAFFREPORT NPDESNEWDEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES JUNE21,2000 PAGE2 ANALYSIS The New Development/Redevelopment Guidelines is to be used by the permittees of the San Bemardino County Stormwater Program as a supplement to the Drainage Area Management Program (DAMP) and the Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD). This document was developed by the New Development/Redevelopment Sub-committee and approved by the NPDES General Committee. The NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit Section 4 of the Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD), Dated April 1995, requires the development and adoption of this document by the permittees no later than July, 1, 2000, as required under NPDES/ROWD Permit 95-53 and NPDES Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement No. 92-315 as amended September 1995. The objective in preparing these Guidelines was to identify pollutant and treatment measures that could be incorporated into development/redevelopment projects and which BMPs should be required as standard practices. The ROWD does not specify a minimum project size to be considered for BMP applications, nor does it specify which land uses should receive the most attention. In general, BMPs are required on a wide- variety of land uses, both residential and non-residential. BMPs should be required on accessory uses of concem i.e. outdoor material/equipment storage, vehicle/equipment-fueling service. Additionally, certain low intensity, but potentially high polluting uses i.e. golf courses, parks and plant nurseries, should have required BMPs implemented. The Community Development Department has reviewed the Guidelines and has found that many BMPs are already being practiced and others can be implemented at a minimum of disruption of development and redevelopment projects. This document is intended to be set forth as guidelines to minimize pollutants entering the storm drain system and the waters of the United States. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BZ:dlw q7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Diane Young, Records Coordinator Oq~/ Records Retention Schedules RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving records retention schedules for the City Manager's Department, City Clerk' s Office, City Council, Code Enforcement, Building and Safety, Finance, Risk Management and the Library. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: After a thorough review of the aforementioned departmental/divisional records retention schedules by the Records Coordinator and the affected department staff, several amendments are recommended for implementation. The amendments have been incorporated into the previous schedules, entered in the updated software program and printed in this new, easier-to-read format. (The retention schedule for the Library is its first.) Each department has approved its respective schedule, as submitted for your consideration, and the City Attomey's Office has reviewed and approved each one for legal compliance. The final step to legally validate the amended schedules is approval of the governing body. These eight schedules comprise the first group of four that will ultimately address ALL departments and divisions of the City. It is anticipated that another group will be submitted for City Council approval in November of this year. RESOLUTION NO. 00-11.5' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS WHEREAS, it has been determined that the City records listed in the attached records retention schedules be retained for the designated periods of time based on their administrative, fiscaL, legal and historical values; and WHEREAS, staff from the Department/Division responsible for each record series has reviewed and approved the recommended retention schedule for that Department/Division; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney's Office has determined that each records retention schedule is legally compliant; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the records retention schedules included in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof are approved. SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June, 2000 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor Resolution No. 00-*** Page 2 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 21 st day of June, 2000. Executed this 22nd day of June, 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk EXHIBIT 'A' Records Retention Schedules for the following Departments / Divisions City Council City Manager City Clerk's Office Finance Risk Management Building and Safety Code Enforcement Library CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 6, 2000 TO: James Markman, City Attomey FROM: SUBJECT: Diafie Young, Records Coordinator Recluest for Approval of Retention Schedules Attached are proposed retention schedules for eight City departments/divisions (listed below), all of which have been reviewed and approved by the Department staff for which they were prepared. Craig Fox, from your office, has reviewed them for legal compliance and provided his recommendations and comments, which have been incorporated into these final versions. Please sign below confirming the City Attomey's approval of the retention schedules. Retention Schedules Included: City Manager Code Enforcement Library City Clerk Building & Safety Risk Management City Council Finance Reviewed for legal compliance: D. Craig Fox, City Attomey's Office June 1, 2000 ~ ~__~'.anffZT~Z, vx--, City Attorney June 7, 2000 Approved by: 'lXiar / Record Retention Schedule Codes Code Tvne Desitnation Definition Media P Paper Event Code Active/Current Audit Current Year Dept Ref Exp/Compl/Term Historical P Separation Supersede Term While record is active and/or current Upon completion of audit Until the end of the current calendar year Department reference papers; destroy when no longer needed or useful Upon expiration, completion or termination Historical record - transfer to City archives at end of Active retention Permanent - Do Not Destroy Original Upon separation from City service Until superseded Until the end of the term Destruction Method Archive P Recycle Scan/Recycle Shred Varied Transfer to City archives Scan & retain original permanently Recycle records (non-confidential) Scan into electronic arehives, then destroy paper Shred records (contains confidential data) Individual records within this series may have differing destruction methods Vital Record N Y Not subject to Vital Records procedures Subject to Vital Records procedures Archive N Y Not for permanent retention To be archived, either on CD in electronic imaging system or in hard copy (City archives) Original or Copy C 0 Non-original; another Department or Division is the "Office of Record" Original record, indicating this Department or Division is the "Office of Record" NOTE: All numbers in the Active, Record Center and Total columns represent the number of months the records are to be retained. For example: Active Record Center Total 24 24 48 indicates that the records are to be retained in the Department for 24 months (once the "Event" has occurred), then transferred to the Records Center for an additional 24 months, for a Total of 48 months, before destruction occurs. City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CODE ENFORCEMENT Record Title Code Name 2031.0 7040.7 8020.8 8021.0 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number code Enforcement Violations 2292 DATE: 06/06/2000 TIME:14:56:35 J RETENTION in months ~ Office Original ~ Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record ta Method Code Center TO i Record Record Copy Class P 18 Active/Curren 18 36 N Shred N 0 t Definition: Includes complaints or requests for service and all incoming/outgoing correspondence pertaining to the case(s}. Citation: CCP 338 Sets forth a 3-year statute of limitations within which a legal action may be brought against a defendant. Code Enforce Legal Affairs (in P 0 Dept Ref 0 0 Y Shred N C Definition: Includes complaints or requests for service and all incoming and outgoing correspondence to the cases. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Temporary Use & Temporary Sign P 24 Active/Curren 0 24 N Code Recycle N 0 t Definition: Includes: Permit application forms and associated plans. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for city council and city Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. {Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Neon Sign Permits P 24 Active/Curren 24 PERM N Code Scan N O t Definition: Includes: Permit application forms and associated plans. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: I City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY COUNCIL Record Title code Name 7011.1 4110 Mayor and Council Correspondence Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number I RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Code Active Event Record ta Code Center TO I Record Record P 24 CUrrent Year 24 48 Y DATE:06/06/2000 ~ TIME:14:53:24 ~ Destruction Archive or Security Method Copy Class Archive Y 0 Definition: General correspondence authored by the Mayor and council. Does not include correspondence specific to a project, which is filed with the project file. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value Of the records.) Page: i City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY M/~NAGER Record Title Code Name 1020.1 General Correepondence 4122 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number RETENTION in months ~ Office Media Vital of Code Active Event Record Total code center Eecord Record P 24 Current Year 36 60 N DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:13:35:07 Destruction Archive or Clas's Shred N O 1020.2 Definition: Outgoing general correspondence and inter-office memos, filed chronologically. correspondence, which is filed with the project file. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Policies & Precedents P 24 Supersede 0 24 Y Recycle Does not include project-specific N O Definition: Policies administered by City Manager's Office only; other Departments may have others. Also includes the complete Policies Manual. 1020.4 1020.5 11300.3 11500.0 (NOTE}: retention after they are superseded. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Newspaper Articles P 12 Current Year 24 36 N Archive Y Definition: Newspaper Clippings / Municipal Media Coverage Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Calendars / Appointment Books P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Shred N Definition: Calendars, appointment books and similar records showing meeting dates/times, appointments, etc. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) United Way Campaign P 36 Current Year 0 36 N Shred N Definition: Records related to the City~s fundraising efforts for United Way. Citation: CCP 338 Sets forth a 3-year statute of limitations within which a legal action may be brought against a defendant. Animal Control Files P 0 Dept Ref 0 0 N Shred N Policies related to Personnel matters and Personnel management are to be forwarded to Personnel for O Page: 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown1 Department N~e Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title ~mher 11630.4 11800.1 11800.7 DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:13:35:07 Page: 2 CITY MANAGER 4122 I RETENTION in months I Office Original Clas's t Code Na/ne Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Copy Definition: Copies of contracts, statistics, monthly reports. (Department reference files only.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Parking citations P 12 Active/Curren 12 24 N Shred N 0 t Definition: All parking tickets - paid, contested, uncollectable - returned from contract Processing Center. (After Final Disposition) CItation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Public Relations Files P 24 Current Year 24 48 N Shred N 0 Definition: Citizen requests for information, requests for service, complaints and correspondence. Also includes customer comment cards and surveys. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Biography & Photographic Files P 24 Historical 0 PERM Y Archive Y O Deflnition: Written and photographic biographical records of City Officials and City Staff. Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.} Press Releases P 24 Current Year 12 36 N Recycle N O Definttton: Formal, written information provided to the media pertaining to City incidents, events, programs, etc. citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY MANAGER IRecord Title Code Name 12050.0 Cable TV Subscriber Complaints 4122 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number I RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Code Active Event Record tal Code Center TO Record Record P 24 Exp/Compl/Ter 0 24 N Deflnition: Cable complaints from service Subscribers, including City response letters. DATE=06/06/2000 TIM~=13=35:07 12050.1 12050.2 12050.3 Destruction Archive or Security Method Copy Class Shred N 0 (NOTE: Retention begins at the termination, expiration or transfer of the current cable franchise, NOT the resolution of the complaint.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Cable Television & Radio: General Definition: P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Shred N RCTV 3 message display request forms; informational memos; video duplication request forms. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Cable Television Franchise Definition: Video Tapes of Definition: P 0 Dept Ref 0 0 Y Recycle N O C Copy of franchise agreement for reference only. Originals on file in City Clerk's Office. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Public Meetings Video 60 Current Year 96 156 N Recycle N video tapes of City Council and all other public meetings. Maintained in VHS format for 5 years; in Hi-8 format for 24 months in office, then in records center for 13 years. Citation: GC 34090.7 Sets forth authorization for destruction of duplicate records. This includes recordings if the City keeps another record, such as written minutes, of the event which was recorded. Page: 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY MANAGER Record Title Code Name 12060.1 13010.1 13010.7 13010.9 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number 4122 RETENTION in months [ Office Media Vital of Code Active Event Record ta Code Center To I Record Record Citation=A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:13:35:07 Ambulance Service Operating Permit Definition: False Alarms Definition: Original Destruction Archive or Method Copy O P 120 Exp/Compl/Ter 0 120 N Shred N m knnual ambulance permits and backup materials. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) P 24 Current Year 24 48 N Shred Alarm ordinance administration records; monthly reports for billing; false alarm cards from the Police Department. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authozization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) N O Monthly Crime Reports P 24 Current Year 0 24 Definition: Reference copies of crime statistics provided by the Police Department. Citation: GC 34090 N Shred N C Police Contract Definition: Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Administration P 0 Dept Ref O 0 N Shred N Includes copies of police service contracts (and amendments), initial research, development and history of the contract, general contract information and records utilized in administering the contract (such as 6% overhead data). Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) C Page: 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown1 Departanent Name CITY F~NAGER · Record Title Code Name 4122 15010.1 Inter-Governmental Agencies Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N~,m~er DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:13=35:07 15010.8 2020.1 2050.2 2060.1 I RETENTION in months I ~ Office Original ~ ~ Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center R cord Record Copy Cla s P 24 Actlve/Curren 0 24 N Recycle N t Includes records for these organizations only during times when a R.C. elected official or member of management serves on the organization's decision-making body. Definition: SANBAG, SCAG, LAFCO, Omnitrans, League of California Cities. (NOTE: Retention begins when the City representative no longer serves as a decision-making member of the Organization.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Sister City Program P 24 Mistorical 0 24 N Archive Definition: Information and documents related to the Sister City Program. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) City Organization Charts P 24 Active/Curren 24 PERM Y Archive t Definition: Budget Working Definition: Y O Y O Official hierarchial organization charts, delineating the structure of the City and its various departments. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Papers P 24 CUrrent Year 24 48 Y Shred N Includes correspondence and backup documents for departmental budget preparation. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Recycle N Annual reports of other agencies and Organizations (other than City of Rancho Cucamonga) - for reference only. Annual Reports Definition: Page: 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY Fd~NAGER Record Title Code Name 2060.3 3000.0 4012.3 5070.2 7010.9 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIM]~:13:35:07 4122 RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Archive Code Center Record Record Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Weekly, Monthly, Qtrly Reports P 24 Current Year 24 PERM N Archive Y 0 Definition:City Manager weekly newsletters, City Manager "Hot Sheets", employee newsletters. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) City Manager Misc. Reference Files P 0 Dept Ref 0 0 N Shred N Definition: Reference files, some of which are maintained in the Records Center for purposes of conserving office space. Files should be periodically reviewed for continued value and possible destruction. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Revenue Files P 0 Dept Ref 0 0 N Recycle N C Definition: A specific set of Administration reference papers including such items as fee studies, property tax issues and tax initiatives. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Organizational Development P 24 Active/Curren 96 120 N Shred N O t Definition: Team building and goal setting records. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed ae exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Federal Legislative Information P 24 Active/Curren 24 48 N Recycle N t Definition: Documentation and correspondence related to lobbying efforts. Page: 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY MAnAGER · Record Title Code Name 7011.6 7011.7 7012.1 Retention Schedule Sorted B~: Record Title ~,mher 4122 DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:13:35:07 I RETENTION in months I Office Original Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Copy Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) State Legislative Information P 24 Active/Curren 24 48 N Shred N t Definition: Documentation and correspondence related to lobbying efforts. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Comission Applications P 24 CUrrent Year 48 72 N Shred N O Definition: Applications submitted by residents to serve on any of the various City commissions. citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and city Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) City Council/Conzaission Contact P 60 Current Year 0 60 N Shred N 0 Definition: Requests for service / action initiated by City Council and Commission members. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction Of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation:.A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: 7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY CLERK Record Title Code Name 1020.1 1020.5 2050.2 3040.1 3040,2 3040.9 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE.' 06/06/2000 TIME.' 11:53.'10 4126 I RETENTION in months ] Office Original Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record tal Method Archive or Code Center To Record Record Copy General Correspondence P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Shred N O Definition: General, chronological correspondence, not specific to any particular project or other specified record series. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Calendars / Appointment Books P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Shred N 0 Definition: Calendars, appointment books and similar records showing meeting dates/times, appointments, etc. Citation= GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Budget Working Papers P 24 Current Year 0 24 Y Recycle N O Definition: Departmental budget working papers including initial budget re~ests, on-going e~ense records, department copies of requisitions, purchase orders and packing slips, etc. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer tc text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Filing Syste~ & Procedures P 24 Supersede 0 24 Y Scan/Recyc Y 0 Definition: Records Hanagement - The official filing and coding systems and procedures for the records management program. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Micrographic & Imging Studlos P 24 Active/Curren 0 24 N Recycle N O t Definition: Background data and research relative to micrographics & imaging e~uipment. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Records Transfer Re~e~ts/Lists P 24 Current Year 0 24 Y Recycle N O Definition: Forms completed. by City departmentB requesting chat records be transferred to the control of the Record~ Me~nt. Division for Storage, destruction, Scanning, etc. Page: i City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY CLERK Record Title Code Name 3040.6 3040.7 3041.0 3041.1 3041.2 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE=06/06/2000 TIME:11:53:10 4126 N RETENTION in months N ~ Office Media V~tal of Destruction Archive Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center R cord Record Citation= GQ 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Records Destruction Authorizations P 24 Current Year 1000 PERM N Scan Y O Definition= Piles documenting approval to destroy City records. (TO be scanned for electronic archiving, but originals are retained in City Clerk vault.} Citation= GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Records Mgmt program P 24 Active/Curren 0 PERM Y Scan/Recyc Y O t Definition= Background information documenting the development and administration of all aspects of the Records Management Program, most specifically retention schedules, policies and procedures, (Mandatory for justification of Program in legal proceedings.} citation= GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Microfilm Master Index Foru~ P 24 Current Year 24 PERM Y Scan/Recyc Y 0 Definition=Forms documenting the image/record on each ~rame of a particular roll of microfilm. Citation= GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Recorded Documents - Land Related P 9999 P 0 PMRM Y P Y O Definition= The ORIGINALS of every document recorded on behalf of the City and all of it's various bodies (ie: City Council, RDA, Fire Board), pertaining to Real Property, such as deeds, easements and certificates of correction. Citation= GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Recorded Doc~ente - Non-Land P 132 Exp/Compl/Ter 0 132 N Varied N O m Original Or Copy Class Page: 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY CLERK Record Title Code Name 6010.1 6020.1 6020.2 Retention Schedule Sorted 'P-y: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:11:53:10 4126 RETENTION in months ~ Office Original Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record tal Method Archive or Code Center TO Record Record Copy Definition: The ORIGINAL recorded documents filed on behalf of the City and all of it's various bodies (city Council, RDA, Fire Board) that DO NOT pertain to Real Property. These include, but are not limited to: Notices of Completion, Agreements/Contracts, Notices of Lien Releases. (See MEMO area for additional detail about filing and retention.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Bids (Unsuccessful) P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Recycle N 0 Definition: Unsuccessful bid packages. (The bid package submitted by the successful bidder is retained with the contract documents and destroyed at the same time the contract is destroyed.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Contracts and Agreements P 24 Active/Curren 108 132 Y Shred N O t Definition: Contracts Log Definition: Original CONTRACTS and AGREEMENTS (including franchises), along with the accepted BID, are maintained by the City clerk's office. (Includes City, RDA, Fire Board.) Citation: CCP 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... " Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 240 Current Year 0 240 Y Recycle N 0 Manual log documenting contracts awarded by the City. Includes contract number, contractor, type of contract and the Council approval date. (Log is then used to perform data entry for electronic tracking in Telnet.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY CLERK IRecord Title Code Name 6050.2 Proof of P~blication 4126 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N. mher DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:11=53:10 I RETENTION in months I Office Original ~ Media Vital Of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record tal Method TO R o Code Center ec rd Record Copy Class P 24 CUrrent Year 0 24 N Recycle N O 7010.0 7010.1 7010.2 Definition: Affidavits of Publication for City Council items. Other departments (ie: Engineering, RDA, Planning, Historical Commission, etc.) maintain their own original Affidavits of PUblication. Affidavits of PUblication for Ordinances are retained permanently in a separate file, numerically by EXCEPTION: Ordinance number. Citations GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text Of GC 34090 for exceptions.) City Council Agenda Packets P 12 Current Year 0 12 Y Scan/Recyc Y O Definition: Original full agenda packets for the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Board. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Council Sab-comittee Agendas P 12 CUrrent Year 0 12 N Scan/Recyc Y O Definition: Original full agenda packets for all Council Sub-Committees. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Task Force Agendas P 12 Current Year 0 12 N Scan/Recyc Y O Definition: Original full agenda packets for all City Task Forces. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. {Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title 7010.3 CITY CLERK 4126 Code Name 7010.4 7010.5 7010.7 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N~,m~er Public Safety Commission Agendas Definition: R.C. Cozenunity Definition: Environmental Mgmt CommAgendas Media Code DATE:06/06/2000 TIME: 11:53:10 Definition: Minutes Definition: I RETENTION in months ] Office Original ~ Active gvent Record tal Vital of Destruction Archive or Security To R r Copy Class Code Center eco d Record Method P 12 Current ~ear 0 12 N Scan/Recyc Y O Original full agenda packets for the Public Safety Commission. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Foundation Agendas P 12 Current Year 0 12 N Scan/Recyc Y O Original full agenda packets for the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 12 current Year 0 12 N Scan/Recyc Y O Original full agenda packets of the Environmental Management Commission. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 1000 P O PERM Y p Y O Original minutes of meetings of the City Council, RedevelopmeLt Agency and Fire Board. In addition to the hard copies being retained permanently, they are scanned into the electronic document imaging system. (Also includes minutes of all Council sub-committees, task forces and the Public Safety, RCCF and Environmental M~mt. Commissions.) (Note: Other City boards, commissions, etc. minutes are retained by the respective departments.) Page: 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY CLERK IRecord Title Code Name 7010.8 7010.9 7011.3 4126 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:11:53:11 I RRTENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Destruction Archive Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Resolutions (and Index) P 1000 P 0 PERM Y p Y 0 Definition: The ORIGINAL resolutions adopted by the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Board, and the respective indexes for each. In addition to the hard copies being retained in the City Clerk vault, all resolutions are scanned into the electronic document imaging system. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Audio Tapes of City Council D 60 Current Year 0 60 Y Recycle N O Definition: Audio tapes of Council, RDA & Fire Board meetings used for transcription purposes only to create the official written minutes of the meetings. (Considered a duplicate record pursuant to G.C. 34090.7) Citation: GC 34090.7 Sets forth authorization for destruction of duplicate records. This includes recordings if the City keeps another record, such as written minutes, of the event which was recorded. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length Of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Municipal Code P 1000 P 0 PERM Y A Y 0 Definition: The official, paper copy of the Municipal Code. Ordinances are codified by an outside contractor twice a year, then supplements are inserted appropriately in the multiple copies of the Code throughout the City. Original or Copy 7011.4 Ordinances (and Definition: (Note: The superseded pages are pulled and retained permanently in the City Clerk's vault.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) index) P 1000 P 0 PERM Y P Y ORIGINAL ordinances of the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Board and the respective indexes. In addition to the'hard copies being retained in the City Clerk vault, all ordinances are scanned into the electronic document imaging system. Page: 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY CLERK Record Title Code Name 7020.0 7020.1 7020.2 RetenCion Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N-~her 4126 DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:ll:53:11 J RETENTION in months J Office Original Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record tal Method Page: 7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY CLERK 4126 IRecord Title Code Name Media Code 7020.3 Campaign Stmts - Successful P Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N~,mher DATE:06/06/2000 TIME: 11:53:}1 I RETENTION in months ~ Office Original Clas's ~ Active Event Record Total Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Center Record Record Method Copy 24 Active/Curren 0 pERM Y Archive y O t 7020.4 7020.5 7020.9 Definition: Campaign statements for successful Mayoral candidates, successful City Council candidates and committees supporting all successful candidates. (Includes nomination documents for all these candidates.) Citation: GC 81009 b (b.) Original campaign statements of mayors, city councilmembers, county supervisors, candidates for any of these offices and committees supporting any officeholder or candidate shall be retained indefinitely, except that original campaign statements of candidates not elected to these offices and of committees supporting candidates not elected to these offices shall be retained by filing offices for a period of not less than five years. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Citation: E.C. 17100 All nomination documents and signatures in lieu of filing fee petitions filed in accordance with this code shall be held by the officer with whom they are filed during the term of office for which they are filed and for four years after the expiration of the term. Election Ballots - Non-Prop218 P 6 Current Year 0 6 N Recycle N Definition: Election Ballots Definition: Oaths of Office All ballots (voted, spoiled, absentee, etc.) from a Municipal election not related to a "new tax or assessment". Citation: E.C. 17302 The packages containing the following ballots and identification envelopes shall be kept by the elections official, unopened and unaltered, for six months from the date Of the election: 1) Voted polling place ballots, 2) Voted absent voter ballots, 3) absent voter identification envelopes, 4) Spoiled ballots, 5) Canceled ballots, 6) Unused absent voter ballots surrendered by the voter pursuant to Section 3015, 7) Ballot receipts. N O - New P 48 Current Year 0 48 N Recycle All ballots (voted, spoiled, absentee, etc.) from a Municipal election related to new taxes or assessments (pursuant to Proposition 218). Citation: CCP 338 Sets forth a 3-year statute of limitations within which a legal action may be brought against a defendant. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records,) P 60 Term 0 60 N Recycle N Page: 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name CITY CLERK Record Title Code Name 7040.4 7040.5 7040.8 7042.1 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Nuxnber DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:ll:53:11 4126 RETENTION in months [ Office Original ~ Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record ta Method Code Center TO 1 Record Record Copy Class Definition: ORIGINAL Oaths of Office for Elected Officials. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) City Attorney Opinions P 120 Current Year 0 pERM N p Y O Definition:Official opinions rendered by the City Attorney's office. Must be retained permanently. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Clai~/Supoenas Log P 24 CUrrent Year 0 24 N Shred N 0 Definition: Written log documenting claims and supoenas served and submitted to the City Clerk's Office. (original documents are then forwarded to Risk Management.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destr~/ction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Stmts of Econ Interest (Form 700) P 84 Current Year 0 84 Y Recycle N 0 Definition: Original Statements of Economic Interest filed pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974. (otherwise known as FPPC Form 700.} Citation: GC 81009 e (d.) Original statements of economic interests of persons holding statewide elective office shall be retained by filing officers indefinitely. (e.) Original reports and statements not specified above in this section shall be retained by filing officers for a period of not less than seven years. Articles of Incorporation P 1000 P 0 PEP34 Y P Y 0 Definition: Original incorporation documents for the City - retained in the City Clerk's vault. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Page: 9 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name FINANCE 4151 IRecord Title Cede Name 2050.1 Final Approved Budget 2050.2 4010.1 4010.2 4011.4 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:16:11:35 RETENTION in months [ Office Original ~ ~ Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record o al Method Code Center T t Record Record Copy Cla s P 24 P 1000 PERM Y Admin A Y O Definition: Final budget approved and adopted by city Council. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Budget Working Papers P 36 Current Year 36 72 Y Admin Shred N O Definition: Includes all correspondence and backup materials used to formulate the final budget documents. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Accounts Payable P 24 Current Year 60 84 Y Admin Shred N O Definition:Accounts payable files. (Does not include Fire and RDA) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Accounts Receivable P 24 Current Year 60 84 Y Admin Shred N 0 Definition: Accounts Receivable files. (Does not include Fire or RDA) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) General Ledger & Poerings P 24 Current Year 24 PERM Y Admin Scan/Recyc Y 0 Page: i City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name FINANCE 4151 IRecord Title Code Name 4011.6 4012.8 Definition: journal Voucher Definition: 4013.1 Fixed Assets 4013.3 1099 FOZ~s Re~ncion Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME: 16:11:35 RETENTION in months ~ Office Original Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record tal Method Code Center TO Record Record Copy Reports including all journal entries and encumbrance reports for a specified period (ie: Fiscal Year). Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length Of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Accounts P 24 Supersede 0 24 Y Admin Recycle N O Master Chart of Accounts used for reference within the Department only. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and city Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) P 24 Current Year 84 108 N Admin Shred N 0 Supporting documentation Of journal vouchers, which are posted in the G/L. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 24 Active/Curren 48 72 Y Admin Recycle N O t Definition: Records documenting the City's fixed assets including furniture, equipment and vehicles. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 24 Current Year 120 144 N Admin Shred N 0 Definition: Individuals' and commercial vendors' special tax forms. Page: 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name FINANCE 4151 Record Title Code Name 4020.3 4030.2 4030.4 4030.6 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:16:ll:35 B RETENTION in months ~ Office Original Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Copy Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Daily Cash Receipts / Revenue P 24 CUrrent Year 84 108 Y Admin Shred N O Definition: All receipts from all Departments processed through cashier. Also includes cash receipts detail reports, summaries and supporting source documents. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Bank Statemen=s & Reconciliations P 24 Audit 36 60 Y Admin Shred N O Definition: Statements and reports received from banks which the City has accounts with, used to reconcile the City books. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Accounts Payable Check Register P 24 Current Year 36 60 Y Admin Recycle N 0 Definition:Listing of all checks (warrants} paid including vendor names, account numbers and date. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Cancelled Checks (Non-RDA or Fire) P 24 CUrrent Year 36 60 Y Admin Shred N 0 Page: 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name FINANCE IRecord 4030.7 4040.2 4040.5 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:16:ll:35 Payroll Deductions & Authorization 4151 [ RETENTION in months [ ~ Office Original Title Code Name Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center R cord Record Copy Definition= Cancelled checks returned by the banks for purposes of reconciling the accounts payables. (Does not include Fire or RDA checks.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Dept. Sign-off List for Payroll P 24 Active/Curren 0 24 N Admin Shred N 0 t Definition= Record of Department Head signing for respective department's payroll checks. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Payroll Register P 24 Current Year 36 60 Y Admin Shred N O Definition=Detail report of payroll paid for a specific pay period. Citation: 29 CFR 516.6 (a) Supplementary basic records: Each employer required to maintain records under this part shall preserve for a period of at least 2 years. (1} Basic emplol~nent and earnings records. From the date of last entry, all basic time and earning cards or sheets... (et seq) (2) Wage rate tables. From their last effective date, all tables or schedules of the employer which provide the piece rates or other rates used in computing straight time earnings, wages, or salary, or overtime pay computation ...... (c) Records of additions to or deductions from wages paid: (1) Those records relating to individual employees referred to in Sec. 516.2 (a){1)... et seq. Citation: 29 CFR 516.5 Each employer shall preserve for at least 3 years: (a) Payroll records. From the last date of entry, all payroll or other records containing the employee information and data required under any of the applicable section of this part, and .... Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by Statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value Of the records.) P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Admin Shred N O Page; 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name FINANCE · Record Title Code Definition: 4040.9 Time Cards Definition: 4041.0 W-2' s Definition: 4041.2 Vacation & Sick Definition: Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N,,m~er DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:16:11:35 4151 RETENTION in months ~ ~ Office Original Name Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center R cord Record Copy Individual authorizations for specific payroll deductions, and deduction listings for specific pay periods. Citation: 29 CFR 516.5 Each employer shall preserve for at least 3 years: (a) Payroll records. From the last date of entry, all payroll or other records containing the employee information and data required under any of the applicable section of this part, and .... citation: A/D NO legal ~tatute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Admin Shred N O Records documenting each employee's hours worked, including time other than straight-time. Citation: 29 CFR 516.6 (a) Supplementary basic records: Each employer required to maintain records under this part shall preserve for a period of at least 2 years. {1} Basic employment and earnings records. From the date of last entry, all basic time and earning cards or sheets... (et seq) (-2) Wage rate tables. From their last effective date, all tables or schedules of the employer which provide the piece rates or other rates used in computing straight-time earnings, wages, or salary, or overtime pay computation ...... (c) Records of additions to or deductions from wages paid: (1) Those records relating to individual employees referred to in Sec. 516.2 (a) (1) ... et seq. Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff Opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 12 Current Year 108 120 Y Admin Shred N C City's copies of original W-2'S distributed to employees in January for the previous calendar year's earnings. Citation: 26 CFR 31.6001-1 (a) (2) Except as otherwise provided... every person required by the regulations in this part to keep records in respect of a tax... shall maintain such records for at least four years after the due date of such tax for the return period to which the records relate, or the date such tax is paid, whichever is later. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Leave Reports P 24 Current Year 24 48 Y Admin Shred N O Records documenting each employee's accrued and used vacation and sick leave. Page: 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title FINANCE 4151 Code Name 4041.3 4090.3 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Nuz~ber DATE:06/06/2000 TIME z16=11:35 J RETENTION in months t Office Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Archive Code Center Record Record Citation: 29 CFR 516.6 {a) Supplementary basic records: Each employer required to maintain records under this part shall preserve for a period of at least 2 years. (1) Basic employment and earnings records. From the date of last entry, all basic time and earning cards or sheets... (st Beg) (2) Wage rate tables. From their last effective date, all tables or schedules of the employer which provide the piece rates or other rates used in computing straightwtime earnings, wages, or salary, or overtime pay computation ...... (c) Records of additions to or deductions from wages paid: (1) Those records relating to individual employees referred to Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) State & Fed'l Qtrly Payroll P 24 Audit 36 60 N Admin Shred N O Definition: City's copies of the original payroll reports generated quarterly and forwarded to the State and Federal gov'ts as required. Citation: 29 USC 436 Every person required to file any report under this subchapter shall maintain records on the matters required to be reported which will provide in sufficient detail the necessary basic information and data .... available for examination for a period of not less than five years after the filing of the documents based on the information which they contain. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Bond Statement Files P 12 Exp/Compl/Ter 108 120 Y Admin Recycle N 0 m Definition: Bank statements on active bond issues. (NOTE: Retain all statements for the life of the bond - per the Finance Officer). Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) original Or Copy Page= 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title FINANCE 4151 Code Name 4060.1 4060.2 4070.1 4070.4 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:16:11:36 RETENTION in months [ ~ Office Original Media Vxtal of Destruction Archive or Code Active EVent Record Total Method Code Center R cord Record Copy Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Audit Correspondence P 24 Audit 24 48 N Admin Shred N O Definition:Incoming and outgoing correspondence related to specific audits. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Audit Reports P 24 Audit 24 48 N Admin Shred N 0 Definition:Reports generated at the conclusion of a specific audit. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Deferred Compensation Reports P 24 Active/Curren 456 480 Y Shred N O t Definition: Reports documenting each employee's deferred compensation contributions and payments made to the deferred compensation providers. (Pursuant to the contract, the City's 3rd party administrator is responsible for retaining the records in accordance with State law.) Citation: 29 CFR 1627.3 (b)(2) (b)(2) Every employer shall keep on file any employee benefit plans such as pension and insurance plans, as well as copies of any seniority systems and merit systems which are in writing, for the full period the plan or system is in effect, and for at least 1 year after its termination... et seq. P.E.R.S. Reports P 24 Current Year 456 480 Y Admin Shred N 0 Definition:Reports documenting City and employee contributions to PERS. Page: 7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title ~,mher DATE=06/06/2000 TIME:16=11=36 FINANCE 4151 Code Name RETENTION in months ~ ~ Office Original Media Vital Of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Archive or Code Center R cord Record Copy Citation: 29 CFR 1627.3 (b)(2) (b)(2) Every employer shall keep On file any employee benefit plans such as pension and insurance plans, as well as copies of any seniority systems and merit systems which are in writing, for the full period the plan or system is in effect, and for at least 1 year after its termination... et seq. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title 15051.5 RISK MANAGEMENT Code Name 4011.5 5070.0 5080.1 5080.3 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number 4154 Risk Management Reference Files Media I RETENTION in n~3nths Code Active Event Record Code Center Definition: Reference materials only. Citation: GC 34090 P 0 Dept Ref 0 DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:17=09:ll I office Original ~ vital of Destruction Archive or Security tal Method TO Record Record Copy Class 0 N Risk Mgmt Recycle N To be destroyed when no longer of use, Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Insurance Policies P 24 Active/Curren 24 48 N Risk Mgmt Shred N O t Definition: Various insurance policies, such as boiler machinery, personal property (equipment), fidelity bonds (re: crime, dishonesty) held by the City. Does not include insurance policies submitted by contractors or policies for which PARSAC (the City's 3rd party administrator) is responsible for administering and retaining. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Training Documentation P 24 Separation 24 48 N Risk Mgmt Shred N 0 Definition:Records documenting training provided to City employees. Citation: CCR 8-3203 (b) (2) Documentation of safety and health training required by subsection (a) (7) for each employee, including employee name or other identifier, training dates, type(s) of hraining, and training providers. This documentation shall be maintained for at least one (1) year. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value'of the records.) Pre-Empl Physicals (Hires) P 24 Separation 84 108 Y Risk Mgmt Shred N O Definition:Documentation of an employee's pre-employment physical examination. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Pre-Empl Physicals (Non-Hires) P 24 CUrrent Year 0 24 N Risk M~mt Shred N O Definition: Records of pre-employment physical examinations of employment candidates not hired. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Page: i City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title 5080.4 RISK bfANAGEMENT 4154 Code Nalne 5080.5 5080,6 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:iT:09=12 Worker's Compensation Clatans / Definition: RETENTION in months [ Z Office Original Clas's ~ Media Vztal of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center R cord Record Copy P 24 Active/Curren 84 108 Y 3rd Party Shred N C t (The originals are retained by the City's 3rd Risk Management copies of worker's compensation Claims and cases. party administrator pursuant to the requirements of OSHA.) Citation: GC 34090.7 O Sets forth authorization for destruction of duplicate records. This includes recordings if the City keeps another record, such as written minutes, of the event which was recorded. Citation: 8 CCR 15400.2 (a) All claim files shall be kept and maintained for a period of five years from the date of injury or from the date On which the last provision of compensation benefits occurred as defined in Labor Code Section 3207, whichever is later. Claim files with Open future medical benefits due to the claimant shall not be destroyed, but two years after the date of the last provision of workers' compensation benefits occurred as defined in Labor Code Section 3207, they may be converted to an inactive or closed status by the administrator. (b) Inactive or closed claim files may be microfilmed for storage, however, the original paper files shall be maintained for at least two years after the claim has been closed or become inactive. Such microfilmed files must be readily reproducible into legible paper form if requested by the Manager for audit. Citation: CLC 5405, Title 8 "The period within which may be commenced proceedings for the collection of the benefits .... is one year from: (a) The date of injury; or (b) The expiration of any period covered by payment under Article 3 .... ; or (C) The date of last furnishing Of any benefits provided for ..... " Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length Of retention based on administrative value Of the records.) Respirator Safety Medical Records P 24 Current Year 576 600 Y Risk Mgmt Shred N Definition: Initial and annual physicals. Citation: 8 CCR 3204 Sets forth the mandatory retention period for A) Employee Medical Records (including exceptions) - "duration of employment plus thirty (30) years", and B) Employee Exposure Records (including exceptions) - "for at least thirty (30) years". Toxic Exposure Records P 24 Current Year 576 600 N Risk Mgmt Shred N Definition: Records documenting employees' exposure to toxic substances, fumes, etc. Page: 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title RISK MAnAGEMENT Code Name 4154 Citation: 8 CCR 3204 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N,,mher DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:iT:09:12 5100.2 5100.3 5100.5 7030.0 RETENTION in months ~ Office Original Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record ta Method TO 1 R rd Record Copy Code Center eco Sets forth the mandatory retention period for A) Employee Medical Records (including exceptions) - "duration Of employment plus thirty (30) years", and B) Employee Exposure Records (including exceptions) - "for at least thirty (30) years". Safety Cou:nittee P 24 Current Year 24 48 N Risk Mgmt Shred N 0 Definition: Includes Safety Conunittee meeting minutes and memos, School Attendance Review Board recommendations and findings. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Safety Investigations P 24 Active/Curren 24 48 N Risk Mgmt Shred N 0 t Definition: Includes photographs, signed statements and facility inspection reports. citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Safety Policy & Procedures P 24 Supersede 24 48 Y Risk Mgmt Recycle N 0 Definition:Written policy on OSHA compliance standards, SOP'S and IIPP's. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Motor Vehicle Reports (MVR'S) P 0 Supersede 0 0 N DM~ Shred N C Definition: DMV status reports on employees driving City vehicles, received twice each year. Used for reference only and destroyed when superseded. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Legal: Investigations & Litigation P 24 Active/Curren 36 60 N Shred N C t Definition: Includes depositions and interrogatories. Citation: GC 34090.7 Sets forth authorization for destruction of duplicate records. This includes recordings if the City keeps another record, such as written minutes, of the event which was recorded. Class Page: 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name RISK MANAGEMENT Record Title Code Name 7030.4 7040.2 7040.6 7040.9 4154 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:17=09:12 I RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the r~cords.) Non-Liability Cases P 24 Active/Curren 60 84 N Risk M~mt Shred N 0 t Definition: HUD and AQMD claims. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Accidents Involving City Vehicles P 24 Current Year 24 48 N Shred N 0 Definition: Copies of traffic colllsion reports involving City vehicles, along with reports from the Safety Committee and Risk Management staff. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Claims Against the City P 24 Active/Curren 60 84 N Risk Mgmt Shred N O t Definition: The ORIGINAL liability claims filed against the City. Files include investigative materials, reports and recommendations. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Damage to City Property P 24 Active/Curren 24 48 N Shred N O t Definition: Original equipment damage reports from Engineering and Fire, PLUS copies of vehicle collision reports and vandalism reports from the Police Dept. Citation: GC 34090 sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Security Archive or Clas's Copy Page: 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name BUILDING & SAFETY DIV Record Title Code Name 3020.1 3020.2 3020.3 3020.4 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N~her DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:14:52:52 Monthly Activity Reports Definition: 4373 RETENTION in months ~ ~ Office Original ~ Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center R cord Record Copy Class P 24 CUrrent Year 160 PERM Y p Y 0 Reports showing permit activity and project estimated values, Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.} Permit ~ogs P 24 CUrrent Year 160 PERM Y p Y 0 Definition: LOgs of project address, date, type of permit, valuation, development and miscellaneous fees, and permit record transmietal forms -- ALL computer generated Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions, (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Utilities Release Log P 24 Current Year 0 24 Y Recycle N 0 Definition:LOg showing properties released (flnaled) by the gas and electric utilities. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.} Inspection Statistical Sun~Daries P 120 CUrrent Year 0 120 N Recycle N 0 Definition: Annual summary of inspections for a given calendar year. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: i City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title 3030.1 Retention ScheduEe Sorted By: Record Title N-v. her 3030.2 3030.3 3030.4 3030.5 6020.4 BUILDING & SAFETY DIV 4373 Code Name Media Code DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:14:52:52 Application for Temporary Utility P 24 Current Year 0 24 Definition: Temporary gas and/or electrical releases pending final inspections. Citation: GC 34090 RETENTION in months { ~ Office Original Active Event Record Total Vital of Destruction Archive or Securlty Code Center R cord Record Method Copy Cla s N Shred N 0 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) App'l. for occupancy Inspection P 24 Current Year 0 PERM N Shred Y 0 Definition:Documents verifying compliance with Building and Planning codes. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Complaints & Inspection Bequests P 24 Active/Curren 0 24 N Shred N 0 t Definition: Requests received to verify compliance with all building related codes. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Application for Plan Duplication P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Shred N 0 Definition: Request for duplication of building plans, processed pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 19851 & City Procedure ~25. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Misc. Applications P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Shred N O Definition: Requests for any Building and Safety related services. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Grading Bonds & Agreements P 12 Active/Curren 12 PERM Y Archive Y O t Page: 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name BUILDING & SAFETY DIV Record Title Code Name 6020.5 8020.1 8020.3 8021.1 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number 4373 Media Code Definition: DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:14:52:52 I RETENTION in months I Office Original Active Event Record ot Vital of Destruction Archive or T al Record Record Method Code Center Copy Agreements and associated bond documentation related to earth moving and compaction. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.} Citation: CCP 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... " Basements, CCR'S, Agreements P 24 Current Year 24 PERM Y Scan/Recyc Y O Definition: Includes: maintenance of yard easements, agreements to hold parcel as one, agreements to accept drainage water, and CCR'S (conditions, covenants & restrictions). Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Construction Permits P 3 Exp/Comp1/Ter 21 PERM Y Scan/Recyc N 0 m Definition: Finaled Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Grading, and Fire Sprinkler permits. (Includes canceled & expired permits.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Plan Check & permit File Copies P 12 Current Year 12 24 N Recycle N C Definition: Department copies of construction permits and plan checks. Citation: GC 34090.7 Sets forth authorization for destruction of duplicate records. This includes recordings if the City keeps another record, such as written minutes, of the event which was recorded. Plan Ck/Eldg Pmt ExBir or Extend P 36 Current Year 0 36 N Shred N 0 Definition: Plan Check and Building Permit expiration (and extension) notification letters. NOTE: NO extensions are ever granted longer than 6 months. NOTE: When a building permit expires, the original permit is stamped "expired". citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Page: 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name BUILDING & SAFETY DIV Record Title Code Name 8021.2 Misc. permit Documents 8040.1 8040.2 8040.3 Retention Schedule Sorted By.' Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:14:52:52 4373 e RETENTION in months ~ Office Original Clas's ~ Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record o al Method Code Center T t Record Record Copy P 12 Current Year 12 PERM N Scan/Recyc N 0 Definition: Back-up reports which document special inspections. Citation: GC 34090 , Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.} Bldg Plans - Retained P 24 CUrrent Year 0 PE~M Y Scan/Recyc N 0 Definition: Plans for: new non-residential & residential structures; condominium projects; structural additions & alterations to non-residential & condominium projects; non-residential & residential grading & drainage. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Building Plans - Non-retained P 24 Current Year 0 PERM N Scan/Recyc N O Definition: Non-structural additions and alterations. Structural additions and alterations to residen- tial structures except condominium projects. New custom homes and new tract homes. Also includes plumbing, mechanical, electrical, fire sprinkler, septic system and grading & drainage plans. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the r~cords.} Misc. Plans P 3 Current Year 3 PBRM N Scan/Recyc N 0 Definition: Plans for: Swimming pools, patio covers, blockwalls, etc. (Note: Some of these are scanned and become part of the associated building permit. This record series covers only those that DO NOT become a part of the building permit.) Page: 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name BUILDING & SAFETY DIV 4373 Record Title Code Name Media Code 8040.4 8040.5 8040.6 8040.7 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:14:52:52 RETENTION in months [ Office Original Active Event Record ta Vital of Destruction Archlye or TO 1 R rd Record Method Code Center eco Copy citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for ex6eptions.) citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Sotl, Percola0ion & Hydrology P 24 Current Year 160 PERM Y Scan/Recyc N O Definition: On-site soils studies. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Citatlon= A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.} Grading certifications P 24 Current Year 0 PERM Y Scan/Recyc N O Definition: Certification that earth work was done in accordance with the UBC. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Calculations, Supporting Docs P 24 Current Year 0 PERM Y Scan/Recyc Y 0 Defini0ion:Includes Structural and energy calculations, acoustic reports, etc. to construction plans. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Misc. Plans and Documents P 24 Current Year 0 PERM Y Scan/Recyc Y O Definition: All plans and associated documents not otherwise classified within this retention schedule. Class Page: 5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title BUILDING & SAFETY DIV Code Name 8050.1 8050.2 8050.3 8050.4 8070.3 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Nx~.~er DATE=06/06/2000 TIMEr14:52:52 '4373 Media Code e RETENTION in months I Office Orlginal Active Event Record Total Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Center Record Record Method Copy Citations GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation= A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by Statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Code Violation Correspondence P 36 Active/Curren 0 36 N Shred N 0 t Definition=Letters providing notice or instruction regarding City or UBC code violations. Citation: CCP 338 Sets forth a 3-year Statute of limitations within which a legal action may be brought against a defendant. Code Modification Fer~a P 24 Current Year 0 PERM Y Scan/Recyc N O Definition= Forms documenting acceptance of modifications to Codes. Citation= GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) General Correspondence P 24 Current Year 0 24 Y Shred N 0 Definition:Includes letters, memos and other correspondence not specific to a particular project. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Structure Abatement Notices P 36 Active/Curren 0 36 Y Shred N 0 t Definition= Official notices to property owners to abate substandard structures and/or properties. (Includes notices of termination and release.) Citation: CQP 338 Sets forth a 3-year statute of limitations within which a legal action may be brought against a defendant. Bldg. Inspection Reports & Files P 36 Active/Curren 0 36 Y Recycle N O Page: 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name BUILDING & SAFETY DiV 4373 Record Title Code Name Medla Code 8070.4 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:14=52|52 I RETENTION in ~nths Active Event Record Code Center Definition: Reports of building inspections performed. citations GC 34090 Total ~ Office Vital of Destruction cord Record Method Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Daily Inspection Records P 24 Current Year 0 24 Y Recycle Definition: LOg Of daily inspections performed. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Archive or Security Copy Class N O Pagez 7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name LIBRARY 4533 · Record Title Code Name 11300.1 11800.2 11801.0 4012.3 4020.5 S030.0 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:15=00:26 RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Donations P 48 Current Year 0 48 N Library Recycle N O Definition:Donations to the Library from outside sources such as The Friends of the Library. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Citafion: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value o~ the records.) Public Services & Relations Files P 48 Ac=tve/Curren 0 48 N Library Recycle N O t Definition: Includes Inter-Library Loan records, and library tour records. citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Pablic Inquiries and Complaints P 48 Current Year 0 48 N Library Shred N O Definition:Complaints and requests ~or service or information received by the library. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction o~ city records other than those listed as exceptions. {Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Revenue files P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Library Recycle N O Definition: Deposit slips received from Finance for Daily Cash Receipts AND cash register roll tapes. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction o~ city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Grants P 24 Audit 84 108 N Library Recycle N 0 Definition: All original records pertaining to State of California grants awarded to the Library. Library Board Agendas P 48 Current Year 0 48 N Library Recycle N 0 Definition: Original agenda packets o~ the Library Board. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Page: i Archive or Security Copy class City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name LIBRARY 4533 · Record Title Code Name 5030.5 volunteer Program 7010.7 7041.1 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:06/06/2000 TIME:iS:00:27 I RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record P 48 Active/Curren 0 48 N Library Shred t Definition: Includes all records pertaining to Library volunteers. Citation: GC 34090 Archive or Copy N O Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction Of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Library Board Minutes P 1000 P O PERM N Library Scan Definition:Original minutes of the Library Board. Citation: Education code 18918 The Board shall cause a proper record of its proceedings to be kept. Fines P 48 Current Year 0 48 N Library Shred Definition: Includes records of all fines collected by the Library. These records are confidential. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Y O N O SecuritJ Class Page: 2 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk June 21, 2000 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE NOVEMBER 7, 2000 ELECTION Attached you will find Resolutions relating to the November 7, 2000 election. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following Resolutions: · ,' Calling for the Municipal Election to be held November 7, 2000 for the positions of two City Council seats, a City Clerk and a City Treasurer, and to consolidate said election with the County of San Bernardino. v' Approving the regulations for candidates running for elective office. After the Council approves the Resolutions, I will proceed with the San Bernardino County Registrar's office to place these matters on the November 7 ballot. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully submitted, City Clerk /dja Attachments (as noted) RESOLUTION NO. 00-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 7TM DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAID DATE WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to General Law Cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on Tuesday, November 7th 2000, for the election of Municipal Officers. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities within said State, there shall be, and there is hereby called and ordered, held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the 7th day of November 2000, a General Municipal Election of the qualified electors of said City for the purpose of electing two members of the City Council for the full term of four years, a City Clerk for the full term of four years, and a City Treasurer for the full term of four years. SECTION 2: That the General Municipal Election hereby called for the date hereinbefore specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with the Presidential General Election to be held on said date within the City. The proceedings, polling places, precincts, precinct board members and officers for the General Municipal Election hereby called shall be the same as those provided for said Presidential General Election. The Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the General Municipal Election hereby called with said Presidential General Election, and said Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said General Municipal Election and said election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election and one formal ballot, namely the ballot used at said General Election shall be used. Said Registrar of Voters shall supervise the canvass of said returns for said Special Municipal Election and transmit said returns to the City Council of said City which shall thereafter declare the results thereof. Resolution No. 00- x,,x Page 2 SECTION 3: SECTION 4: The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall reimburse said County for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill.. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is directed to forward, without delay, to said Registrar of Voters, a certified copy of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21't day of June 2000. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor A'I'I'EST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of June 2000. Executed this 22"d day of June, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 00-/I 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CHARGE TO CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, FOR PREPARATION OF MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATES STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7TM 2000 WH EREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any city may adopt a charge against candidates pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidates statement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: General Provisions. That pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 7th, 2000, may prepare a candidate's statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. Such statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate's education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. Such statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. Such statement shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed. Such statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period. SECTION 2: Additional Materials. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package. SECTION 3: Payment. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidates statements filed pursuant to the Elections Code, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance his or her pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter's pamphlet. The estimate is just an approximation of Resolution No. 00- YYY Page 2 the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the Clerk may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the Clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate's representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued. SECTION 5: That all previous resolutions establishing Council policy on payment for candidates statements are repealed. SECTION 6: That this Resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 7th, 2000, and shall then be repealed. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June 2000. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor A'I'I'EST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 00-, YYY Page 3 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of June 2000. Executed this 22nd day of June, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk RAN CUCAMONGA ENGINEEE~ING DEPARTI~IENT S'affReport DATE: June 21, 2000 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phil Verbera, Assistant Engineer SURIECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAiNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3b AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-10, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 19TM AND CARNELIAN STREETS, SUBMITFED BY EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC., (WALGREENS) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving and accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit 99-10, located at the southeast comer of 19m and Carnelian Streets in the Neighborhood Commercial District, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 14, 1999 for the construction and operation of a drive-thru pharmacy. The Developer, Evergreen Devco, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: Undergrounding Parkway Overhead Improvements Utilities $9,000.00 $109,000.00 $4,500.00 $ 54,500.00 q? CITY COLrNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 99-10 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. June 21, 2000 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to annexation forms signed by the property owner are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, a~mj.~,Neifl~l~( City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. C)O '/{ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-10 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Evergreen Devco, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southeast comer of 19~h and Carnelian Streets; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as CUP 99-10; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. tO4/q X RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.3b AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-10 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Ma'mtenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in w~fmg with the vaitten consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-10 - EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed mmual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Sigmund J. Sliwoski The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6882, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 71 PAGES 54 AND 55 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHERLY 13.62 FEET OF PARCEL 3 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6882, LYING WESTERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 5. ALL AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ATTACHED HEREWITH AND MADE A PART HEREOF. .A NORTil CITY OF RANCEIO CUCAiVIONGA ENG~G DIVISION Trn~ cae qq- I0 EXtn~IT:. A A-z Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project' s approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and Waffle signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energizing of the street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fired the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development pmject's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. EXHIBIT B: (Continued) Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energizing of the street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3b (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district and qualifying Commercial/Industrial Parcels from outside this district. The various landscape silos that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Conditional Use Permit 99-10 Number of Lamps Dist. Street Lights Type: 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD #1 ...... 2 ...... SLD #6 ............... Trail Turf Dist. Item: D.G/S.F. S.F. LMD #3b ...... Landscaping Non-Turf Trees S.F. EA Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Multi-Family Parcel 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Commercial Acre 1999.52 2.00 1999.52 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 1 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $35.54 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Command Acre 1,716.63 1.00 1,716.63 $51.40 $88,235.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 1 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. -- $51.40 Annual Assessment LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commemial/Industrial Maintenance District): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Command Acre 1,849.01 1.00 1,849.01 $352.80 $652,3510.73 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 1 Acre x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $352.80 Annual Assessment C-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEEI~ING DEPAI~T~IENT StaffRe rt DATE~ FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP NUMBER 15912, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SUBMITTED BY RYLAND HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 15912, accepting the subject agreements and security, ordering the annexation to Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 15912, located at the southwest comer of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way in the Low-Medium Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 14, 1998 for the division of 10 acres into 26 lots and an interim detention basin. The Developer, Ryland Homes, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond Tract15912 $962,000.00 $481,000.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TTRACT 15912 - RYLAND HOMES June 21, 2000 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school district.,; and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attomey. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachments L / /' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION NORTH Q NTS ITEM: Tracts 15911 and 15912 TITLE: Vicinity Map /// RESOLUTION NO. e9 - t> q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV1NG TRACT MAP NUMBER 15912, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15912, submitted by John Friedman, and consisting of 26 single family lots and an interim detention basin located at the southwest comer of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on October 14, 1998, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15912 is the final map of the division of land appmved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Ryland Homes as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, said Improvement Security and said Interim Basin Maintenance Agreement, submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Maintenance and Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15912 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. //d RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT 15912 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the fight of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of Calitbmia ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached heretn and incerpomted herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have: also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15912 June 21, 2000 Page 2 WHEREAS, at this tune the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. //¢ Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: Ryland Homes of Califomia, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, dba Ryland Homes The legal description of the Property is: Tract No. 15912 Lot 9 in Block "K" as shown on the Preliminary Map of the Etiwanda Colony Lands, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as shown by map on file in Book 2, Page 24 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. Exhibit A (Continued) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION A-2 NORTH f[ 1 "= 200' ITEM: Tract 15912 TITLE: Annexation to SLD #1 and SLD #8 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 STREET LIGHT MAINENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) SWeet Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and Irafire signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and tralTm signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15912 Street Lights 5800L 9500L SLD #1 5 SLD #8 12 Number of Lamps 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L //7 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical #of Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Physical Units Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Multi-Family Parcel 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Commercial Acre | 999.52 2.00 1999.52 $17.77 $71,060.00 Total $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: $17.77 23 Parcels x I A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $408.71 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $193.75 for the Fiscal Year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use tinit Type Units Unit~ Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 81 1.00 81 $193.75 $15,694.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: $193.75 23 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $193.75 Rate Per A.U. = $4,456.25 Annual Assessment C-1 RAN CUCAMONGA DEPARTMENT DATE: TO:, FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21,2000 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF THE MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 FOR TRACT 15947, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WL HOMES LLC, DBA JOHN LAING HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 15947, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 15947, located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, in the Low Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 13, 1999, for the division of 9.11 acres into 31 lots. The Developer, WL Homes LLC, dba John Laing Homes, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $396,000.00 $198,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15947 June 21, 2000 Page 2 Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MEP:sd Attachments ~F BASE LINE ROAD TRACT L 5947 LLI r~ I'- hi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: TT15947 TITLE: VICINITY MAP EXBIBIT: /,~/ RESOLUTION NO. DD-/~ b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15947, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15947, submitted by WL Homes LLC, dba John Laing Homes, and consisting of 31 lots located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on October 13, 1999, and is in ,compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15947 is the final map of the division of land appro~ed as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by WL Homes LLC, dba John Laing Homes, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15947 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. O~'/2--1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 FOR TRACT 15947 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XII ID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15947 June 21, 2000 Page 2 WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including thE; levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A To Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Landscape Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property The Owner of the Property is: WL HOMES LLC, dba JOHN LAING HOMES (Print or type the name of the Owner of the Property in the space provided above.) The legal description of the Property is: (Type or print the legal description of the Property in the space provided above. Alternatively, a copy of the legal description may be attached to this Exhibit A.) LOT 1, BLOCK "S", ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. A-1 EXHIBIT "A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 \ \ BASE LINE ROAD i/ ~J D Z TRACT "' 15947 ": Z ,~: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA A NOFtTII /,~ ITEM: TT15947 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintamed by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energizing of the street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fired the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development proj ect's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. .-i EXHIBIT B (Continued) Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energizing of the street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 CLMD #2) represents landscape sims throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and ad such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, community trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 99/00 00/01 Ground Cover and Shrubs 50.641 9.81 Turf 41.13 3.40 Parks 32.37 43.257 Community Trails 3.00 7.37 Total Area in LMD # 1 127.14 Acres 127.88Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the various landscape areas and the parks are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew. EXHIBIT B (Continued) Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15947 Dist. Street Lights Type: 5800L 9500L SLD #1 --- 8 SLD #3 11 --- Number of Lamps 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L Trail Turf Dist. Item: D.G/S.F. S.F. LMD #2 ...... Landscaping Non-Turf S.F. 7,330 Trees EA 26 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Physical Units Units Unit Single Family Parcel 16,956.0 1.00 16,956.0 $17.77 0 0 Multi-Family Parcel 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 Revenue $301,310.00 $111,190.00 Commercial Acre 1999.52 2.00 1999.52 $17.77 $71,060.00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 2 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $479.79 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I ,and Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 4,071.00 1.00 4,071.00 $47.15 $191,9,18.00 Family Multi- Parcel 388.00 1.00 388.00 $47.15 $18,29,1.000 Family Commercial Acre 78.79 2.00 157.58 $47.15 $7,430.00 TOTAL Total $217,672.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 40 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $1,886.00 Annual Assessment EXHIBIT C (Continued) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Communiy): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Units Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 4071 1.0 4071 $422.00 $1,717,960.00 Family Multi- Parcel 388 1.00 388 $422.00 $163,740.00 Family Comm/Ind. Acre 24,676 2.00 49.352 422.00 $20,830.00 Vacant Acre 405.13 0.25 101.2825 422.00 $42,740.00 TOTAL $192,270.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 40 dwelling units x 1 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $16,880.00 Annual Assessment /d/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA EN~INEER~N~ DEP~RTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF THE MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 15948, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WL HOMES LLC, DBA JOHN LAING HOMES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 15948, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 15948, located on the south side of Base Line Road west of Etiwanda Avenue, in the Low Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 13, 1999, for the division of 9.75 acres into 40 lots. The Developer, WL Homes LLC, dba John Laing Homes, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $293,000.00 $146,500.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15948 June 21, 2000 Page 2 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MEP:sd Attachments > BASE LINE ROAD . ) TRACT:' 15948" Z mmm CITY OF RAHCHO CUCAMOHGA EHGIHEEBING DIVISIOH ITEM: 1715948 TITLE: ViCIHITY MAP EXHIBIT: RESOLUTION NO. ~{)-/,,2'4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15948, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15948, submitted by WL Homes LLC, dba John Laing Homes, and consisting of 40 lots located on the south side of Base Line Road west of Etiwanda Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on October 13, 1999, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 15948 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by WL Homes LLC, dba ,John Laing Homes, as developer; and VVHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 15948 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~)' / c~ 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT 15948 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance distdct pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 15948 June 21, 2000 Page 2 WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements, The proportional special benefit dedved by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A To Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Landscape Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property The Owner of the Property is: WL HOMES LLC, dba JOHN LAING HOHES (Print or type the name of the Owner of the Property in the space provided above.) The legal description of the Property is: (Typeorp~ntthelegaldescriptionofthepropertyinthe ~aceprovided above. Almm~ively, aco~ ofthelegaldescfiptionmay beatlachedm ~isExhibitA.) LOT 2, BLOCK "S", ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE 24, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. A-1 EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 \, i, )\,, ,,, " I'-- ~ ' ..... ~ BASE LINE ROAD TRACT 15948 ILl Z <~ Z LLI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NORTII ITEM: TT15948 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2000/2001 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southem California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energizing of the street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Comraunity. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base Line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project' s approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. EXHIBIT B (Continued) Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds; however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Any new street lights in areas to be maintained by the District, will become part of the active work program at such time as these new areas are annexed into the District. The normal process will be the dedication of the areas to the City, at which time a sufficient non-refundable deposit will be made by the developer to the City. This deposit will provide for costs of energizing and six months of ordinary and usual maintenance operation and servicing of the street lights in each development at the time of initial operation of the lighting system. The costs will be based on the number and type of street lights and based on Southern California Edison Company's rate for street lights. Immediately upon energizing of the street lights will become a part of the work program of the district. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 CLMD #2) rapresents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Commtmity. These sitas are associated with areas within Victoria and ad such any benefit derived tirom the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that commtmity. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos, commtmity trails and parks. The 32.37 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, Windrows Park and Ellena Park. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 99/00 00/01 Ground Cover and Shrubs 50.641 9.81 Turf 41.13 3.40 Parks 32.37 43.257 Community Trails 3.00 7.37 Total Area in LMD #1 127.14 Acres 127.88Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the various landscape areas and the parks are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by' the City's Trails and Application Crew. EXHIBIT B (Continued) Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: Tract 15948 Dist. Street Lights Type: 5800L 9500L SLD #1 --- 4 SLD #3 13 --- Number ofLamps 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L Trail Turf Dist. Item: D.G/S.F. S.F. LMD #2 ...... Landscaping Non-Turf S.F. 7,331 Trees EA 27 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of Rate Per Physical # of Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Ph sical Units Units Unit Single Family Parcel 16,9~6.0 1.00 16,956.0 $17.77 0 0 Multi-Family Parcel 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 Revenue $301,310.00 $111,190.00 Commercial Acre 1999.52 2.00 1999.52 $17.77 $71,060.00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 40 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $710.80 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 4,071.00 1.00 4,071.00 $47.15 $191,948.00 Family Multi- Parcel 388.00 1.00 388.00 $47.15 $18,294.000 Family Commercial Acre 78.79 2.00 157.58 $47.15 $7,430.00 TOTAL $217,6'72.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 2 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $1,273.05 Annual Assessment EXHIBIT C (Continued) LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Communiy): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Units Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 4071 1.0 4071 $422.00 $1,717,960.00 Family Multi- Parcel 388 1.00 388 $422.00 $163,740.00 Family Comm/Ind. Acre 24,676. 2.00 49.352 422.00 $20,830.00 Vacant Acre 405.13 0.25 101.2825 422.00 $42,740.00 TOTAL $192,270.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is: 27 dwelling units x 1 A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $11,394.00 Annual Assessment CHO CUCAMONGA EI~I}YEEEIN~ DEPAETMENT S'6affReport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD SOUTH SIDE PARKWAY LANDSCAPING FOR TRACTS 15947 AND 15948 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY WL HOMES LLC, DBA JOHN LAING HOMES It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tracts 15947 and 15948, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue, in the Low Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 13, 1999, for the division of 18.86 acres into 71 lots. The Developer, WL Homes LLC, dba John Laing Homes, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the Base Line Road Landscape Parkway improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $226,000.00 $113,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. CI'P( COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACTS 15947 AND 15948 BASE LINE RD. SOUTH SIDE PARKWAY LANDSCAPING June 21,2000 Page 2 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. & R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MEP:sd Attachments BASE LINE ROAD LU TRACT TRACT ~< 15948 15947 ~ Z F- CITYOF RAHCH6 CUCAMONGA ENGINEEBING DIVISION ITEM: 1115947 15948 TITLE: VICINITY MAP BASE LINE LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT: /'/7 RESOLUTION NO. ~:)"1~// A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD SOUTH SIDE PARKWAY LANDSCAPING FOR TRACTS 15947 AND 15948 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by WI_ Homes LLC, dba John Laing Homes, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Base Line Road at Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as Tracts 15947 and 15948; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RANCHO CUCAMONGA COHHUNITY SERVICES DATE: TO: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT ~ THE crrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE INLAND EMPIRE OPEN, INC. TO CONDUCT THE BUY. COM PROFESSIONAL GOLF TOURNAMENT AT EMRRE LAKES ~ C(XJRSE FROM OCTOBER 9-15, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the proposed agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Inland Empire Open, Inc., to conduct the Buy. Com Professional Golf Tournament. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Buy. Com Inland Empire Open is a professional golf tournament involving professional golfers who are attempting to qualify for the major PGA tour. The Buy. Com Inland Empire Open Tour stop is proposed to be held at the Empire Lakes Country Club in Rancho Cucamonga from October 9-15, 2000, and again in October of 2001. As scheduled, the Rancho Cucamonga tournament will be the last event on the Buy. Com tour for the year. This will create the exciting challenge of presenting the last opportunity of the year for golfers to qualify for the PGA tour. General Dynamics originally approached the City to propose a partnership with the Buy. Com tour in presenting the Inland Empire Open at Empire Lakes Golf Course. The prestige and excitement of a professional golf tournament within the City promises to generate a heightened awareness of the Rancho Cucamonga community as a great place to live and conduct business. City staff have held numerous coordination meetings with representatives of General Dynamics and the Inland Empire Open to prepare the proposed agreement of sponsorship. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF BUY. COM AGREEMENT June 21, 2000 Page 2 Conducting this professional golf tournament will require coordination of numerous Iogistical issues. Bleachers, media tents, skyboxes and concession stands will be censtructed on the course by the tournament. Parking lots for the event will be provided in the adjoining businesses and on Sixth Street itself also coordinated by tournament officials. Cleveland Street will also be closed during the tournament for media trucks, players tents, PGA offices, etc. Television coverage of the tournament on a sports channel is a distinct possibility as well. The major points included in the agreement are as follows: · This is a two-year agreement to conduct the tour at Empire Lakes in October of 2000 and 2001. · The City will provide sponsorship in the amount of $30,000 for each tournament plus a limited amount of staff time to coordinate and prepare for the tournament. · The City will be able to work with tournament media and sponsors to promote the City's residential and business opportunities. · The City will provide the required police services for the tournament with the cost to be paid by the tournament. The tournament will provide the City and it's residents with many opportunities to participate through volunteerism and actual attendance during the toumament activities. · The tournament will acknowledge the City as a major sponsor on all printed materials and media releases. FISCAL IMPACT The City will provide sponsorship in the amount of $30,000 plus provide a maximum designated amount of staff time for coordination and preparation prior to the tournament. ~c~tf~lly ~s~, (~~~ices Director KM/mam Attachment AGREEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of June 15, 2000 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City"); and the Inland Empire Open, Inc, a California non-profit corporation (501 c 3) ("Tournament"). WHEREAS, Toumament has entered into an agreement with PGA TOUR, INC. ("PGA TOUR") a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference and General Dynamics Properties/Empire Lakes Golf Course ("Empire Lakes") a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "B" herein together with any amendments thereto or superseding versions thereof (Collectively, the 'q'ournament Agreement"), wherein Tournament agrees to manage, organize, sponsor, and operate a BUY. COM golf Tournament to be known as the BUY,COM Inland Empire Open ("the "Tournament") and WHEREAS, under the PGA TOUR and Empire Lakes agreement, Toumament has agreed to obtain the use of a course, clubhouse, and other adjoining facilities and properties in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of the Tournament and WHEREAS, to induce the Tournament to enter into such a two (2) year Site Agreement, City has agreed to provide Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) in cash and additional in-kind support in labor, services and products in each year of the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City, and Tournament agree as follows: I. OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY, SPONSORSHIP. City agrees to pay to the Tournament, $15,000 on or before July 1, 2000, and $15,000 on or before September 1, 2000, for the Agreement year 2000, and on or before June 1, 2001, and on or before September 1, 2001 for the Agreement year 2001 for the complete cash obligation of sponsorship of the BUY.COM Inland Empire Open: provided, however, that the City's obligation to do so is contingent upon: (a) the completion of the Tournament at Empire Lakes Golf Course, and (b) the fulfillment of the obligations of the Tournament set forth herein below. (a) The City will provide all materials for City of Rancho Cucamonga "Press Kits" and/or "Information Packets" for distribution in the Media tent and other ancillary functions of the Tournament during the term of this Agreement. (b) The City will provide one (1) person to work during the Tournament Week in the Media Tent. /5/ (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) The City will provide (not to exceed) one hundred management level staff time in the six (6) months Tournament week to coordinate Tournament activities. (100) hours of proceeding the The City will provide (not to exceed) one hundred (100) hours of street maintenance crew to assist in off-site support work, i.e., traffic barricades, traffic directional signs, cones, etc. The City will not assess any ancillary city taxes or usage fees for parking, merchandise, food and/or beverages during the Tournament period. The City will provide one (1) "Master Temporary Use Permit" for conducting the Tournament in each year of the Agreement. Appropriate "Building Department" permits will be required. Specific Building Department permits that will be required are; a) Building Inspector, b) Electrical, and c) Fire Marshall. Terms, conditions, parameters and related entities will be specified in the Master Temporary Use Permit. As part of the City's co-sponsorship, the City agrees to waive all costs of the Master Temporary Use Permit and Building Department permit fees. It should be understood that both parties, the City and the Tournament will pledge their joint cooperation for a smooth operational, safe and user friendly event. The Master Temporary Use Permit shall include, but not limited to the use, construction and placement of; signs, graphics, banners, flags, perimeter fencing, scoreboards, bleachers, skyboxes, tents, trailers, temporary flooring, displays, scaffolding, temporary structures, concession areas, vendor concession equipment, caterer equipment, storage areas, television compound and equipment, waste management, port-o-lets, equipment, materials, phone, portable power and electric, cable and other related Tournament activities. The City will provide "City of Rancho Cucamonga" police officers on-site for patrol and safety of the general public during the Tournament week. All police and public security services shall be provided by offcars from the San Bernardino County Sheriff Department. All required police services will be determined and provided by the Raneho Cucamonga Sheriff Station Command and personnel. The City will charge forty-seven dollars and thirty-five cents ($47.35) per offcar, per hour and fifty-eight dollars and ninety-six cants ($58.96) per supervisor, per hour to the Tournament for such services. No overtime and/or additional fees will be charged by the City. All police requirements (allocation of hours, budget and shifts) must be arranged and made in a joint agreement between the City and the Tournament a minimum of fourteen (14) days in advance of the Tournament Week. The Tournament shall provide payment for the estimated cost of police services at least seven (7) days prior to the first day of the Tournament. A final accounting of police costs will be 2 (h) completed and final payment adjustments made within two (2) weeks following the last day of the Tournament. The City will provide a minimum of two (2) Rancho Cucamonga police officers on Monday, October 9 through Thursday, October 12 at the above rate as specified in paragraph (g) starting at 6:30 A.M. and concluding at 4:30 P.M., local time. The City will provide a minimum of five (4) officers and one (1) supervisor on Friday, October 13 through Sunday, October 15, starting at 6:30 A.M. and concluding at 4:30 P.M., local time. Additionally, the City police force will patrol the grounds and surrounding/adjacent areas on a continuous basis (day & night) dudng the Tournament period during their normal routine watch at no cost to the Tournament. Cooperation and conservative time utilization of all officers during the Tournament period will be used at all times. Staggering of police schedules will be used for efficiency and cost control. Scheduling will be ~nalized and subject to a written agreement/schedule between the Tournament Director and the Chief of Police. Similar dates will be used in 2001. The City police mobile command unit/RV will be provided on site at Empire Lakes Golf Course during the Tournament period at no cost to the Tournament. II. (a) (b) (C) (d) (e) BEST EFFORTS and GOOD FAITH bv the CITY. The City will assist the BUY.COM Inland Empire Open in obtaining the required temporary Master Temporary Use Permit and Building Permits. The City will assist the BUY.COM Inland Empire Open in coordinating the requirements of the City or County Fire Marshall, Building Inspector, Health Inspector, and/or Police & Fire Departments. The City will assist the BUY.COM Inland Empire Open with partial or complete closure of Sixth and Cleveland Street. The City will act as liaison with Cal Trans if needed. The City will assist in obtaining required temporary electric, telephone, cable and television/cable lines, etc. The City will assist in off-site signage for parking, directional and traffic control. Permanent directional signs with the Tournament logo will be erected along City streets subject to City regulations. The number of signs will be agreed in writing between the Toumament Director and the City at a minimum of 120 days before the scheduled Tournament Period. The cost of the printing of the signs will be the burden of the Tournament. The City will provide materials, stakes and labor and will be erected at no cost 3 (f) (g) (h) (i) (k) to the Tournament. Directional sign design is subject to approval by both parties. The City will assist in securing waste management and trash pick-up services at nominal or no cost. The City will use its best efforts to assist the BUY.COM Inland Empire Open in securing ambulance and EMS services at no cost. The City will assist the BUY.COM Inland Empire Open in securing Volunteers for the event. The City will assist in providing barricades, cones, directional signs (both static and electric) and restraints. The City will cooperate in providing a room for day-care facilities in a close proximity to the golf course, if available. The City will provide assistance and the names of companies and their key contacts in the solicitation of sponsors from companies located within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. III. OBLIGATIONS OF THE TOURNAMENT. Tournament shall comply with all terms and conditions of the Site Agreement and shall not hold or operate the Toumament at any other site except Empire Lakes Golf Course in Rancho Cucamonga, California in each of the years set forth in paragraph 1 above. (a) The Tournament will extend eight (8) invitations to the City to attend the Media/Sponsors day to be held in year one of the Agreement, Monday September 18, 2000 and a date similar in 2001. In addition, the current Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be available to participate in each year of the Agreement for the purpose of "addressing" the audience and actively participating in the Media/Sponsors Day activities. Actual details of the participation and scope of involvement will be arranged by the Tournament Director and the City. (b) The Tournament will provide three thousand five hundred (3,500) "Good Any Day" Tickets (value $8.00 each) for distribution to staff, employees, vendors, suppliers and friends of the City. (c) The Tournament will provide four (4) Wednesday Classic Pro-Am packages. 4 (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (k) The Tournament will provide one (1) Monday Pro-Am Team Scramble entry (foursome). The Tournament will provide seventy-five (75) VIP Season Passes (value $50.00 each) and forty (40) VIP Parking Passes (value $35.00 each). The Tournament will provide fifteen (15) Daily Directors Pavilion Skybox Passes for use Thursday through Sunday (value $40.00 per person per day). It should be noted that the City at its option, may purchase the use of a "Private Skybox". Specific private skybox costs and parameters will be submitted by the Tournament Director to the City before June 1, 2000. The Tournament will arrange as part of the sponsorship a small token gift to all attendees of the Media/Sponsors Day from the City. The Tournament will be financially responsible for the procurement of the gift. At the option of the city, they may arrange for the gift to be at their own discretion as well as the responsibility of purchasing and financial responsibility for the item(s). The Tournament agrees to provide in all "Press Releases"; (A) the City of Rancho Cucamonga logo on the bottom left side of the front page and (B) the origin city location header, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. The Tournament agrees to provide in all primary printed materials, i.e., Volunteer Application/Information, Schedule of Events and related brochures, the display of the City of Rancho Cucamonga logo in a prominent position. The Tournament agrees as part of the Sponsorship, to provide the exclusive use of a ten-by-ten (10' x 10') area located inside the Expo Village Tent at the entrance/exit area of the Golf Course. It is the responsibility of the City to provide personnel to maintain the booth dudng the Tournament period and all handouts, printed materials, hardware, displays, banners and related items are the responsibility of the City. All booth parameters are specified in the "Patron Booth" contract. The Tournament agrees as part of the Sponsorship, to provide the exclusive "Sponsorship of; (A) Media tent, to be known as Media Tent, "Presented by City of Rancho Cucamonga", (B) Information Booths, to be known as Information Booth, "Presented by City of Rancho Cucamonga", (C) Tee number one (1), sponsored by the "City of Rancho Cucamonga". All appropriate and positioned logo placements are at the discretion of the Tournament Director. The Tournament agrees as part of the Sponsorship, to provide "Information Booths" sponsored by "City of Rancho Cucamonga", in 5 155 (m) (n) specific and designated areas of the Tournament activities. Those areas are, but not limited to; (A) three (3) locations on the golf course or adjacent property, (B) the Ontario Airport Marriott, a.k.a., the "Official Hotel", and (C) the Ontario International Airport. All off-location sites must have prior written approval of the property owner, management company or responsible entity. City may, but is not required to, provide staff in these Information Booths. The Tournament shall be responsible for providing written notification regarding any partial or full street closures to all business owners along 6th and Cleveland Streets, as required by the City. The Tournament shall obtain written permission for any street closure from those businesses whose access will be restricted due to these closures. Copies of all correspondence shall be provided in a timely manner to the City. The Tournament will at its own discretion contract "private security" for duties involving non-armed officers and/or security guard responsibilities. IV. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall be effective as of June 1, 2000 and shall continue in effect through the conclusion of the Tournament in 2001 or upon the eadier occurrence of any of the following: (a) default of either party hereto and subsequent notice of termination by the non-breaching party to the breaching party. (b) termination of the Site Agreement (c) termination of the PGA TOUR Agreement (d) at the option of the City of Rancho Cucamonga concurring with the extended use of Empire Lakes Golf Course, a right of first refusal for an extension to sponsor the Tournament for a time determined by the parameters of an extended or new Agreement. (a) MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any duties or obligations under this Agreement may be assigned or delegated without the pdor wdtten consent of the other parties, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 6 (b) Notices. Any notices to be given hereunder by either party to any other may be effected either by personal delivery in writing, by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested by receipted, overnight courier service, or facsimile. Notices shall be addressed too the parties at the addresses appearing herein below, but each party may change the address by written notice in accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally will be deemed communicated as of actual receipt; mailed notices will be deemed communicated as of two (2) days after mailing when posted in San Bernardino County, California, and five (5) days after mailing if posted elsewhere; notices sent by overnight courier service shall be deemed communicated on the business day following the day upon which such notice was delivered to the overnight courier as evidenced by the receipt therefor; and facsimile notices shall be deemed effective upon transmission thereof as evidenced by electronic confirmation therefor from the facsimile machine of the transmitting party. If to City: The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Attention: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Dir. Phone (909) 477-2848 Ex. 2101 Fax (909) 477-2761 If to Tournament: Inland Empire Open, Inc. 7201 Haven Avenue Suite E-310 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Attention: Robert Klemme, Board Chairman Phone (909) 948-5565 Fax (909) 948-5572 If to Empire Lakes: Empire Lakes Golf Course c/o General Dynamics Properties 3270 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 400 Ontario, California 91764 Attention: Jeffery Kudlac, Staff Vice President Phone (909) 484-4800 Fax (909) 484-4804 7 /57 Copy to: James L Markman, Rancho Cucamonga City Attorney Number One Civic Center Circle P.O. Box 1059 Brea, California 92622-1059 Phone (714) 990-0901 Fax (714) 990-6230 Bruce D. Varner, ESQ., Toumament Attorney Varner, Saleson & Dobler 3750 University Ave. Suite 610 Riverside, California 92507 Phone (909) 274-7777 Fax (909) 274-7770 (c) (d) (e) (f) Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto with respect to the sponsorship, hosting, and management of the PGA TOUR Tournament and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such sponsorship. Each party of this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, statement, or premise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding. Attorney's Fees. If any action at law or in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to attomey's fees and costs, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. Modification. No modification, waiver, amendment, discharge or change of the Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in writing and signed by the party against whom the enforcement of such modification, waiver, amendment, discharge or change is or may be sought. Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 8 (g) (h) (i) (k) (m) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to the rules of conflict of laws. The parties hereto irrevocably and unconditionally consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California and of the federal courts of the United States of America located in the State of California for any actions, suits or proceedings arising out of or relating to this Agreement (and also agree not to commence any action, suit or proceeding relating thereto except in such courts.). Captions. Captions and paregraph headings in the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and do not define, describe or limit the scope or intent of the Agreement or any of the terms hereof. Gender and Number. Words used in the masculine, feminine, or neuter gender shall each be deemed to refer to the other whenever the context so requires and words used in the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to refer to the other whenever the context so requires. Severability. In the event any term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement herein contained is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, the fact that such term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement is invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of any other term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement contained herein. Inclement Weather. Due to the conditions that severe or adverse weather would cancel, postpone or delay a portion and/or cancellation of the Tournament, no revenue refund or credits is due to the City. Final approval for conducting and/or cancellation of the Tournament is the responsibility of the PGA TOUR, Insurance. The City will be named additional insured as part of the policy, enjoying all protection and privileges pertaining to the liability insurance specifications and requirements of the PGA TOUR and General Dynamics Properties. The insurance policy shall remain on premises during the Tournament in the Tournament trailer located on the grounds of Empire Lakes Golf Course. Insurance coverage to be provided by Marsh USA. An original copy of the Certificate of Insurance shall be provided to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to the Tournament and shall be subject to the approval of the City. The policy along with appropriate 9 appropriate certificates of insurance from vendors, suppliers, contractors and other entities will be on file and available for review during the Tournament period. Binding Nature. Subject to any limitations or conditions on assignment as set forth herein above, all terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of an be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and the year first set forth above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Title: Date: INLAND EMPIRE OPEN, INC. By: Title: Date: 10 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRepo DATE: June 21, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Supervisor APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE AWARD AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH PAINTING THE TOWN, INC., OF CALIFORNIA, FOR REPAINTING OF RESTROOMS IN NINE CITY PARKS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $$18,828.00 (PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM FUNDS 40, 41, 43 AND 47. RECOMMENDATION Approval to authorize award and execute a contract with Painting the Town, Inc., of Riverside, California, for repainting ofrestrooms in nine city parks, to be funded from funds 40, 41, 43 and 47. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Pursuant to previous City Council action, bids were solicited, advertised, and a mandatory job walk was scheduled. There were insufficient bidders present at the mandatory job walk. Staff procured approval from the City Attomey to directly negotiate the contract. Through a competitive negotiation process, bids were received from two contractors, Painting the Town, Inc. was found to be the lowest responsible bidder. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DC:dlw RANCHO CUCAMONGA E NGt N E E R IN G D EPA RTME NT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dale B. Catron, City Facilities Supervisor APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE AWARD AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH KITSON SPECIALTY CONTRACTING, OF SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, FOR RESURFACING OF RESTROOM FLOORS IN SIX CITY PARKS, IN THE AMOUNT OF $$11,490.00 (PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM FUNDS 40, 41, 43 AND 47. RECOMMENDATION Approval to authorize award and execute a contract with Kitson Specialty Contracting, of Santa Fe Springs, Califomia, for resurfacing of restroom floors in six city parks, to be funded from funds 40, 41,43 and 47. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Pursuant m previous City Council action, bids were solicited, advertised, and a mandatory job walk was scheduled. There were no bidders present at the mandatory job walk. Staff procured approval from the City Attorney to directly negotiate the contract. Through a competitive negotiation process, bids were received from three contractors, and Kitson Specialty Contracting was found to be the lowest responsible bidder. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:DC:dlw RANCHO CUCAMON GA ENGINEEDING DEPAI~TMENT S Repor DATFz TO: FROM: BY: SUR1ECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineq~ APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ]DAN GUERRA & ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR HAVEN AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET WIDENING PROJECT, FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO SOUTH OF THE ROUE 210 (30) FREEWAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $325,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 32--4637-9703 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve, award and execute the subject Professional Services Agreement with Dan Guerra & Associates, to provide Engineering Design Service for the Haven Avenue Storm Drain and Street Widening Project, in the amount of $325,000 from Account No. 32-4637-9703. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject Agreement between the City and Dan Guerra & Associates for Engineering Design Service for the Haven Avenue Storm Drain and Street Widening Project, from Base Line Road to South of the Route 210 Freeway, will replace the concrete trapezoidal channel on the west side of Haven Avenue with underground storm drain and widen the street to three lanes on the west side with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights. In addition, the intersection at Base Line Road will be improved with dual left turn lanes on Base Line and a fight turn lane will be added for the southbound traffic on Haven. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HAVEN AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET WIDENING PROJECT - June 21, 2000 Page 2 Requests for proposals were sent to four Engineering firms, with only two responding, Dan Guerra & Associates was selected from the two proposals submitted. The bid is within the amount budgeted in Account No. 32-4637-9703. City Engineer WJO:LEH:dlw RA NC HO CUCAMO N GA ENGINEERING DIVISION Staff Report DATE: June 21, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager SUBJECT: EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with the California State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission for the installation of electric vehicle charging ~tations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount not to exceed $200,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The California Energy Commission's Fiscal Year 1999/2000 budget includes an appropriation of $200,000 for use the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the installation of electric vehicle charging stations at vadous city facilities. The appropriation is by request of State Senator Jim Brulte. The City has until March 2002 to expend the funds and close out the project. The locations for installations are at; Civic Center, Corporate Yard, Metrolink Station, Etiwanda Creek Fjark, Milliken Park, Windrows Park, Adult Sports Complex (2 stations), Heritage Park, RC Public Library, Red Hill Park, and Beryl Park West. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:DB/smd Attachments I I Hillside Rdi 14 I "' Banyan St~ \ 2 19th Base Line J ~ 11' I, I Foothill BI ~ Arrow Rt ~8 CITY OF RANCH(;;) CUCAMONGA Electric Vehicle Charging Stations 1 Foothill BI Arrow Rt LEGEND 4th St {) 0.25 0 0.25 05 0.75 Miles Prepared b~ Chds Bopko June 1,2000 CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: IqROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21,2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, A1CP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~JS:;> APPROVAL OF A JOINT USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CI1T OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR THE BANYAN STREET AT FREDERICKSBURG AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Joint Use Agreement between the City and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign the agreement, for the Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic Signal and Widening Improvements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic Signal and Widening Improvement project is currently out to bid, with the bid opening scheduled for Tuesday, June 20, 2000. The Project will widen the south side of Banyan Street from Deer Creek Channel to approximately 700 feet westerly, as well as install a traffic signal at the intersection of Fredericksburg Avenue. The improvements will remove surface drainage, facilitate the conveyance of traffic and provide for the safety of pedestrians (school children) crossing Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue. The southerly widening (40 feet) of Banyan Street is within San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) property, requiring the need for the Joint Use Agreement between the City and Flood Control District for the construction, operation and maintenance of the roadway improvements. A copy of the Joint Use Agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map/Resolntion (Joint Use Agreement) RESOLUTION NO. ~;~0-/~ 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVINO THE JOINT USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration a Joint Use Agreement between the City and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD), for the Banyan Street at Fredericksburg Avenue Traffic Signal and Widening Improvements; and WHEREAS, the Joint Use Agreement is for the construction, operation and maintenance of the roadway improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves that said Joint Use Agreement be hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Maintenance Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. EXHIBIT "A" Banyan Street PROJECT LIMITS N,T.S, BANYAN STREET AT FREDRICKSBUR6 AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS VICINITY MAP THE CiTY ~A~'C~O OF Staff Report DATE: TO:. June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Ncil, City Engineer Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engincer~ ACCEPT THE IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, AND THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 97-09, SUBMITTED BY KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RED OAK STREET AND ARROW ROUTE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for DR 97-09, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release of the Performrace Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of DR 97-09, located on the northeast corner of Red Oak Street and Arrow Route, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. c/o Pamela D. Steele 4200 Latham Street, Suite B Riverside, CA 92501 Release: Accept: Respec sub~~ ~ii~i~ WJO:LRB:Is Attachments Faithful Performance Bond 5713171 $165,400 Labor and Materials Bond 5713171 $3,400 17/-) RESOLUTION NO. Ot9-1~?~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 97-09 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR 97-09, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. /71 HILLSIDE HILLSIDE WILSON BANYAN ~u ~ .,- eth RANCHO CUCAMONOA :' 6fh ONTARIO the Rancho city of Cucamonga Staff Report DA'[F_: June 21,2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 78 homes within Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related File: Variance 99-11. APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a request to construct perimeter tract walls up to approximately 21 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation purposes for Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related Files: Development Review 99-72, Tentative Tract 15911 and 15912. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council review the available information attached and either deny the appeal by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Denial or continue the item until further information is available to determine the alternative placement and design of the proposed wall along the I-15 Freeway. BACKGROUND: The City Council considered the subject appeal at the June 7, 2000, meeting. The public hearing was continued to provide staff and the applicant time to0btain confirmation from CALTRANS regarding whether or not the developer would be able to construct a sound wall within the CALTRANS I-15 Freeway right--of-way. Staff has had conversations with Tony Louka, SeniorTransportation Engineer with CALTRANS. Mr. Louka has provided written confirmation that CALTRANS will cooperate with the developer and allow the wall within their right-of-way (see Exhibit "A"). According to Mr. Louka, CALTRANS is currently studying a widening concept for the I-15 Freeway but the actual widening would not take place for approximately ten years. The widening would obviously necessitate demolition of any wall Ryland was to build along the I-15 shoulder but CALTRANS would re-install a sound wall after the widening occurs to protect the homes. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 99-72 AND VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES June 21,2000 Page 2 The developer is in the process of generating an acoustical analysis to determine the necessary height and length of the wall if located on the 1-15 shoulder and to obtain their own confirmation of CALTRANS willingness to cooperate but none of this information is ready yet. If this information becomes available in time, staff will present it to the City Council at the June 21, 2000 meeting. It should be noted that the visual impact of a sound wall located along the shoulder of the I-15 Freeway would likely be far greater than the 21 foot high wall as proposed by the developer and approved by the Planning Commission. The I-15 is elevated twenty some odd feet above the level of the site so the sound wall would be elevated as well. Furthermore, the height and length of the wall is yet to be determined but may well exceed six feet high and longer than the frontage of the site in order to provide sufficient noise mitigation. It would be highly visible from both the freeway and the surrounding vicinity. The wall as proposed/approved on site would be hidden behind future homes to be built within the tract, minimized against the background of the I-15 slope embankment, and only extend along the frontage of the site. In case the City Council wishes to take action on the item consistent with staff's original recommendation, resolutions of denial are attached. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:BLC\Is AttachmentS: Exhibit "A" - Fax from CALTRANS Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - City Council Staff Report dated June 7, 2000 Resolution to Deny Appeal for Development Review 99-72 Resolution to Deny Appeal for Variance 99-11 Sent By: CALTRANS; 909 383 5975; Jun~14-O0 14:31; .......... ~.~u~ ~.u~ Ubv; e-13- 0 ~:54AM; 9094772847 => O00 ~e~ 5975~ Page 111 #1/1 (gb{))47t.2750 - ~ {~09l 471-2847 ~ 2~19 City of Rancho Cucamon,qa Planning Division From: Brent Le Count PaCes: I nd~; 06/13/00 x Piece RelHy Tony:. rhaeffi;s fOr yOUr phone call yesterday indicalir~3 that you have reviewed Ryland's plans, visits0 the site, and concluded that CALTRANS will be willing to sccep~ a 8ou~'¢:1 mifigalion ~ Wilran iIS righl.-d. wey an the I- 1 ~. Th~ manef will be considered hy OUr City CounCil ne~ '.reek encl it i~ Imperemve thal I ge~ sotneEhl~lg in wrffirlg from you to document your detem'JnatlQ~. If you f]~d.l'ne wording acceptabte, please '~ign the statement below to confirm ~at CALTP. AN~ will allow Ryland to build a sound wall v, nThir~ tfie I- 15 righi of way and fax Ih/S back to me at 477-2847. }f Ihe wording is not .lccs~3tal)le, Dieass don'! h~tate to revise it to your satisfaction Or dralt your own slatsmerit. Trlanks for all your help on this malter Toey!! I have revjewed Rytand's project and visited the s~te CALTRAN$ w~/~ allow Ryland I Iomes b DuikJ a SOund waft within the l-15 Freeway fight.of.way to mifJgate freew~y ~ fct RylaT~d's tract Ryb. nd's we, ll vv~t be sul)ject to CALTRANS PelTaft reyjew proCeSS Ih;Ough II~ Permits DeparlTfienl. the Rancho city of Cucamonga StagRepor DATE: June 7,2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 78 homes within Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related File: Variance 99-11. APPEAL OF VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - The appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a request to construct perimeter tract walls up to approximately 21 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation purposes for Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related Files: Development Review 99-72, Tentative Tract 15911 and 15912. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal filed in opposition to the project and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission approving the development review and variance applications. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 on October 14, 1998. The tracts are located on both sides of East Avenue, north and south of the abandoned Southern Pacific right-of-way. A noise study was conducted during review of the tracts to ascertain noise impacts from the I-15 Freeway on the home sites and identify mitigation methods. The study recommended construction of masonry walls as high as 17 feet above pad level to mitigate freeway noise (which would result in a 21-foot high wall on the high side). The highest walls would be located adjacent to the freeway 1,000 feet from the East Avenue frontage. The high wall is necessary because the I-15 Freeway is approximately 20 feet higher CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 99-72 AND VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES June 7, 2000 Page 2 than the elevation of the project site (see Exhibit "B"). The tracts are designed in conformance with the wall height requirements. On April 12, 2000, the Planning Commission approved Development Review 99-72 for the design review of homes within the two tracts. The Commission also approved Vadance 99-11 to allow the developer to construct sound walls as high as 21 feet. The subject appeal was filed in a timely fashion by James Banks on Apdl 24, 2000. ANALYSIS: Mr. Banks poses the following points in his appeal: "A buffer zone could be [provided along the I-15 frontage] filled with tall berms, shrubs and trees which would act as a sound absorbent while adding to the beauty of the project and the community and providing an environmental benefit with vegetation." Response: Provision of tall, landscaped berms would certainly have aesthetic value, but there is no evidence that it would provide adequate noise attenuation for future homeowners. While plants may provide a perception of less noise, acoustic studies have proven that they do not reduce actual noise levels. The applicanrs noise consultant has studied the situation and determined that with a 6-foot high wall at the eastern boundary of the project, homes would have to be set back 1,000 feet from the 1-15 Freeway to achieve acceptable noise levels. This would effectively preclude development of the site in conformance with permitted land uses. Furthermore, according to the noise consultant, trees and vegetation provide little, if any, sound attenuation. The Etiwanda Specific Plan does contain provisions for increasing density in exchange for open space under the Optional Standards. The developer chose a lower density, more consistent with the neighborhood, using the Basic Development Standards; hence, the lots are larger, but there is no common open space. According to CALTRANS, it would be possible for the developer to construct a sound wall within the 1-15 Freeway right-of-way. A 6-foot wall on top of the freeway slope would offer superior sound attenuation (see Exhibit "B"); however, the developer does not wish to construct a wall within the freeway right-of-way because it wou Id have to be much longer than the actual project frontage on the freeway in order to effectively mitigate noise. 2. "People who live near the wall are not going to see the sunshine until 10:00 am." Response: The freeway itselfwill block early morning light because it is higher than the top of the proposed sound wall. "It will be an engineering feat to design and build a structure 17 feet high and 8 inches thick which will withstand the forca of [our local high] winds...the wall will be so rigid that the next big ripple from the San Andreas Fault will lay it on the ground." Response: The sound wall must be specially engineered in order to meet Uniform Building Code standards. "The wall will be aesthetically contrary to everything the Etiwanda Specific Plan tded to accomplish in terms of rural appearance...and the wall will become a precedent." Response: The highest portion of the wall is located along the I-15 Freeway frontage, appreximately 1,000 feet from East Avenue. Due to the steep freeway slope, the wall will be difficult to see from the freeway. The Planning Commission conditioned the developer to provide a two-toned color scheme for the high walls to CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 99-72 AND VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES June 7, 2000 Page 3 help reduce the apparent height of the walls. This technique has been successfully used on similar sound walls along the south side of Highland Avenue at Milliken Avenue. The walls are designed with split faced and fluted split faced block, and vine pockets to allow vines to grow up the outside of the walls. The walls are necessary to permit reasonable development of the project site in conformance with the land use permitted by the Etiwanda Specific Plan and are designed to be as aesthetically pleasing as possible. The vast majority of residential land use districts within Etiwanda that have frontage on the freeway are designated Low-Medium Residential (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium Residential (8 to 14 dwelling units per acre). Development within these districts will very likely require a form of sound attenuation similar to that proposed for the subject development. ALTERNATIVES: Require the developer to install the wall at the top of the slope within the 1-15 Freeway right-of-way; however, it would be contrary to the appellant's desire for light and openness. Uphold the appeal. Require the developer to install trees along the homeowner's side of wall to soften appearance. (Current design has shrubs and vines only). Deny the appeal and add a condition. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. City Planner BB:BLC\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appellant's Letter dated Apdl 24, 2000 Exhibit "B" - Sound Wall Cross Section Exhibit "C" - Developer's Letters dated May 2, 11,22, and 31,2000 Exhibit"D"- Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 12, 2000 Exhibit "E" - Planning Commission Resolution 00-31 Exhibit "F" - Planning Commission Resolution 00-32 Exhibit "G" - Planning Commission Minutes dated April 12, 2000 Resolution to Deny Appeal for Development Review 99-72 Resolution to Deny Appeal for Variance 99-11 10788 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 April 21, 2000 C~i~Cotmcil City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: Variance 99-11, Ryland Homes Dear City Council: I live at 13181 Victoria Street, Etiwanda. I am appealing the decision of the Planning Commission made Wednesday, April 12, 2000. I was unexpectedly unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting, so I must resort to this method of making my objections known. My check for $126 is enclosed. The Citizens Committee which worked on the Etiwanda Specific Plan devoted a significant amount of time to the question of planning around the 1-15 freeway. The Committee was very concerned about the construction of houses near the freeway. One of the Committee's proposals was to put a frontage road along the freeway route. When that proposal seemed unlikely to pass, the Committee turned its attention to other solutions. The Committee allowed higher densities along the freeway and provided exceptional set-back and wider open space trade off requirements to address the conflict between residences and the freeway. The Committee's theory was to allow a developer to leave more space between the houses and the freeway and pick up the house count with a little more density away from the freeway. The Committee attempted to create an ordinance which would allow the developer the same number of houses as other nearby areas of Etiwanda, but bunch the houses away from the freeway. This method would have left a buffer zone between the houses and the freeway. The buffer zone could be CityCouncil CityClerk April21,2000 Page 2 filled with tall berms, shrubs and trees which would act as a sound absorbent while adding to the beauty of the project and the community and providing an environmental benefit with vegetation. Lush vegetation can effectively absorb sound. Ryland's tree removal has, in fact, doubled the noise of the fleeway where I reside several hundred feet away. The proposed wall will reflect the sound, not absorb it. People who live near the wall are not going to see the sunshine until 10:00 A.M. Every ten years or so the wind blows over 100 mph in Etiwanda. It will be aft engineering feat to design and build a structure 17 feet high and 8 inches thick which will withstand the force of this wind. ffthat feat can be accomplished, the wall will be so rigid that the next big ripple tiom the San Andreas Fault will lay it on the. ground .... The wall will be aesthetically contrary to everything the Etiwanda Sp,eci~e Plan tried to accomplish in terms of a rural appearance. ffthis wall becomes a precedent which is followed elsewhere, the main purposes of the Etiwanda Specific Plan will be ~-ustrated if not totally thwarted. Please weigh the arguments for and against the wall, consider the alternatives and make a judgment which will benefit the community in the long run. Thank you for considering my appeal. JBJ/tlm Enclosure: Check Tract 15911 RYLAND HOMES ~A LOT "A" SE~ON LANDSCAPE SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHEEl~ 2 OF 2 FEBRUARY 7, 2000 Garcia, Carlos Full Name: Job Title: Company: Business Address: Business: Brent Le Count City Planner City HalI-Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive 1st Floor-Planning Department Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 (909) 477-2700 Brent, Here are Ryland's response to the appeal and letter regarding our project. I will have more plans ready in a few days and have a colored version for the city council meeting. In the meantime, I believe you saw the enclosed picture. Call me with any questions. Thanks. P.S. Email me at cgarcia@ryland.com. That is good form of communication. Take care. Carlos 5/2/00 RECEIVED MAY ~. ~ 2'000 City n,', Rancho Cucamon~c - {:)irision Mestre Greve Associates May 11, 2000 RECEIVE..D MAYI?2O00 Mr. Carlos Gareia Ryland Homes 15373 Innovation Drive Suite 300 San D~ego, CA .92128 Subject: Comments on Noise Issues for Tract 15911. Dear Mr. Garcia, We have reviewed the comments by Mr. James Banks, Jr. in the letter addressed April 21, 2000 to the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga. In the letter, Mr. Banks, Jr. addresses several issues. We have agreed to respond only to the issue pertaining to noise mitigation required for Tract 15911. Mr. Banks, Jr. raises the issue of betruing and vegetation (trees and shrubs) as a noise barrier verses a concrete block noise barrier. This particular issue will be discussed in the following paragraphs. The results of our noise analysis for Tract 15911 (refer to Mestre Greve Associates Report #00- 08; "Noise Analysis For Tentative Tracts 15911 & 15912; January 26, 2000) did conclude that homes adjacent to the I- 15 Freeway will require a noise barrier up to 17 feet in height in order to meet the City' s noise standard. Effective noise barriers consist of a concrete or plexi glass wall, a berm, or a combination of the two. The Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration CFHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model", FHWA-RD-77-108, December 1978), states "lfthe woods are very dense, i.e., there is no clear line of sight between the observer and the source, and if the height of the trees extends at least 5 metres above the line of sight, then a 5 dBA attenuation is allowed if the woods have a depth of 30 metres. An additional 5 dBA may he obtained if the depth of the woods extends for another 30 metres. 10 dBA is the maximum attenuation dense woods can provide ". Several other publications on noise control support this conclusion (refer to Beranek, L,L., Editor, "Noise And Vibration Control", 1988; Hendriks, R, "Technical Noise Supplement") Noise may be attenuated by trees and shrubs but the result is not nearly as effective or feasible as a concrete block wall. Sincerely, Mestre Greve Associates Fred Greve, P.E. 280 Newport Center Drive, Suite 230 · Newport Beach, CA 92660 · (949) 760-0891 · Fax (949) 760-1928 /~'5 May ~. ~0~0 Clandestine Tatlonghad 1502 Lagoon Street West Covina, CA 91790 YLAND HOMES 57ziO Fleet Street 5uile 200 Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 603-8001 Tel (760) 603-8005 Fax Dear C(andestine, We appreciate your aunrs interest in our Ryland Communi~ and hope we can accommodate her home needs. Thank you for voicing your concems over the environment specific to our project. Ryland with an already approved Tentative Map and Conditions of Approval purchased this project This included the removal of trees. However, the conditions also had a mitigation measure that requires the replanting of trees of vadous spedes. We will implement this mitigation measure. Ryland as a whole does many positive deeds to endch our environment Among them is dedication of land to vadous Parks and Recreation entities, bud ng of parks within our community, and payment of fees used specffically to build parks and / or improve them. Thank you for your support and interest in Ryland's success. Regards, Ca Fo Eg'd ~101 Mestre Grove Associates May 31, 2000 Mr. Carlos Oarcia Ryland Homes 5740 Fleet Street, Suite 200 Cfflsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Comments on Noise ksues for Tract 1~911. Th,~ purpose of this letter is to fttrthcr 8ddrcss the issue of vegetation (bees and shrubs) as a means of attenuatin8 noise in orde~ to meet the City of Rancho Cucamonga required noise standards for Tract 15911. As mcntionedin our previous letter datcd Ivhy 15, 2000, a depth of 60 meters (200/).) of dense woods would provide approximately a 10 dBA att~uation. However, this is a generalization and the actual reduction could be anything between 5 and 15 dBA. In order for this statement to be somewhat valid, the dense woods would have to bc matured and on an cvcn plane, Hence, the statementthat a Z0 dBA attenuation of noise due to 200 ft. of dense woods is a generalization and cannot be accurately supported by future noise prediction analysis. Furthermore, since the worst case ob~ev/er (at Lot 16) will be exposed to nohe levels of 74.6 CNI~ approximately 200 ft, of such dense and matured woods would be required. It appears that such mitigation measures for this particular project will not be feasible. AdditianaIly, we would not support this approval due to the unceria(nty of the cffcctivcncis of such acou~cal u~am'ents. Sincerely, Mestre Greve Associates ~/~/~r as Fred Grove, P.E. 1-15 FREEWAY ES 23.95' 115'? 2% H=16' TO 17' LOT A & CCWD ~,LOP~E. - ~ EASEMENT H=38'. TOP OF-~'' 0._ PER FINAL ACOUSTICAL REPORT · TA , EW~E~R~ ~ EXIST. 15" S H=2.0' TO 6.7' o COVER DEPTH 8.8'? ~ = PER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS {STD. DWG. 604 TYPE B} Report #00-08 Page 8 of 20 The FHWA model used these assumptions to compute the future noise levels at the project site. Table 3 reports the modeling results in terms of distances to the 60, 65, and 70 CNEL contours. These represent the distances from the centerline of the roadway to the contour value shown. Note that the values given in Table 3 do not take into account the effect of intervening topography that may affect the roadway noise exposure. Topographic effects are included in a subsequent section of this report. In addition, these projections do not include any future vehicle noise reduction assumptions to take into account the effects of legislation requiring quieter vehicles in the future. TABLE 3 ND'' "' 'tog '~ I- 15 Freew ay m~East Avenue 4.1 Combined Noise Exposure Projecting the traffic noise levels of two separate noise sources and combining them logarithmically results in the combined noise level impacting the project site. For example, calculations have established that building surfaces at Lot 1 of Tract 15912 will be exposed to East Avenue traffic noise levels of approximately 65.3 CNEL. Building surfaces at Lot I of Tract 15912 will be exposed to 1-15 traffic noise levels of approximately 67.8 CNEL. Summing these noise levels results in a combined traffic noise level of 69.7 CNEL impacting the building surfaces. 5.0 EXTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION For the exterior living areas which are exposed to noise levels greater than 65 CNEL, some form of noise mitigation is required. An effective method of reducing the traffic noise to acceptable levels is with a noise barrier. Representative cross-sections along 1-15 Freeway and East Avenue (see Appendix 1A for analysis data) were analyzed utilizing the FHWA Model to determine the necessary noise barrier locations and heights. The results of the analysis indicate that in order to meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard. a noise barrier will be required for exterior living areas adjacent to 1-15 Freeway and East Avenue. The required noise barrier locations and heights to meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard are listed in Table 4, and are shown in Exhibit 2 and 3. /gq TH E C IT Y OF I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA S tffReport DATE: TO.' FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 12, 2000 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-72 - RYLAND HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 78 homes within Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12. Related File: Variance 99-11. VARIANCE 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES - A request to construct perimeter tract walls up to approximately 17 feet high where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted for freeway noise mitigation purposes for Tracts 15911 and 15912 in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the southwest and northeast corners of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific right-of-way - APN: 227-131-05 and 227-141-11 and 12, Related Files: Development Review 99-72, Tentative Tract 15911 and 15912. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A= Backqround: The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 in October of 1998. The current request is for a Design Review of the homes, grading, and landscaping for both tracts. Site Characteristics: The project sites are located on the east and west sides of East Avenue and on the north and south sides of an abandoned railroad right-of-way. The Tract 15911 site (east side of East Avenue) is undeveloped land with non-native grasses and other ruderal plant species. There are no windrows or heritage trees within the project boundaries. The mature windrow south of the abandoned railroad will not be impacted by the project. The Tract 15912 site (west of East Avenue) contains a single-family dwelling, accessory structures, and a collection of inoperable vehicles and debris. There are four stands of EUcalyptus windrows on-site which show signs of damage by borer beetles, fire, and barbed wire and are generally in poor condition. A healthy Eucalyptus windrow stand PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 99-72 & VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES April 12, 2000 Page 2 is south of the site and will not be impacted by the project. The Planning Commission approved a Tree RemovaiPermit for removal of the trees with the Tentative Tract Map. The sites slopes approximately 2 to 3 percent from north to south. ANALYSIS: General: The number of lots for the Tract 15911 site is proposed to be reduced from 26 to 23 to accommodate a larger home plan than originally anticipated. Lot size ranges from 7,895 square feet to 18,600 square feet (10,000 square foot average) and homes range from 2,566 square feet to 3,300 square feet. Four home plans are proposed, each with four separate elevation types (reverse plotting and side-on garage alternatives provide even greater variation). A pedestrian paseo with river rock treatment (low maintenance) is provided at the east side of Tract 15911 site connecting to a community horse trail. The home designs are the same as were approved for Tract 15798 (currently being constructed near the southwest corner of the Route 30 and 1-15 Freev~ays) and exhibit a high level of design integrity. Variance: The Tentative Tract Maps were conditionally approved by the Planning Commission in October 1998. As environmental mitigation for freeway traffic noise, high sound walls are required. The highest sound walls will be along the south and east sides of the Tract 15911 site (northeast corner of Southern Pacific Railroad/East Avenue). The wall along the south side is as high as 16 feet overall (retaining wall plus free standing wall above) and along the east edge as high as 21 feet. The maximum allowed wall height in Rancho Cucamonga is 6 feet; hence, a Variance is necessary. Staff believes that findings can be made for approval of the Variance given the unique location of the sites so near the I-15 Freeway (which is substantially higher than the project site), that strict enforcement of the 6-foot height limit would preclude development of the site in accordance with the land use designation since the high walls are necessary to comply with General Plan/Development Code residential noise level criteria, and the excessive wall height will not have a demonstrable negative visual impact. The height of the walls are proposed to be sofiened by a combined split face/fluted block design with vine planting along the base trained to climb the walls. Desiqn Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on February 29, 2000, and recommended approval with conditions. Refer to the attached Design Review Action Agenda for further details (Exhibit H). Technical Review Committee: The Grading and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed Pa~t I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II (the Environmental Checklist). It was found that local environmental conditions have not changed appreciably since the tracts were approved in October of 1998. In brief, various drainage, biologicel, traffic, and noise issues impact the site. Mitigation measures for these issues were adopted by the Commission with tract approval and these mitigation measures are also included in the attached Resolution of /¢/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 99-72 & VAR 99-11 - RYLAND HOMES April 12, 2000 Page 3 Approval. Staff has determined that, with these mitigation measures, there would not be a significant adverse impact upon the environment as a result of this project. Staff recommends issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 99-72 and Variance 99-11 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Resolution Resolution - Site Utilization Map - Site Plan - Grading Plan - Landscape Plan - Floor Plans Elevations - Initial Study Parts I and II - Design Review Action Agenda dated Februar~ 29, 2000 of Approval DR 99-72 of Approval VAR 99-11 RESOLUTION NO. ~)(~)-/~,.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW99-72 THE APPEAL OF THE DESIGN REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 78 HOMES WITHIN TENTATIVE TRACTS 15911 AND 15912 IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTAND NORTHEASTCORNERS OF EAST AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY- APN: 227-131-05 AND 227-141-11 AND 12. A. Recitals. 1. Ryland Homes has filed an application for the approval of Development Review 99-72, as described in the'title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of October 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting and approved Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912, which are the sites of the current application. 3, On the 12th day of April 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was appealed in a timely manner to this Council, 5. On June 7 and continued to June 21, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 7, and continued to June 21, 2000, including, but not limited to, written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No, 00-31, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on both sides of East Avenue on the north and south sides of an abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad righ'eof-way with a street frontage of 1,240 feet on East Avenue and lot depth of 600 to 1,300 feet and is presently vacant; and CITYCOUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. APPEAL OF DR 99-72 - BANKS June 21,2000 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and developed with single- family homes, the property to the south consists of vacant land and the 1-15 Freeway, the property to the east is vacant and the 1-15 Freeway, and the property to the west is vacant and developed with single-family homes; and c. The proposed home plans are the same as were recently approved for Tract 15798 and exhibit a high level of design integrity; and d. The General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan designate a public Community Trail off-site within the railroad easement to the south of the Tract 15911 site; and e. The property is one block away from Etiwanda High School and approximately two blocks away from Etiwanda Intermediate School and will generate additional traffic and school children that will use East Avenue and Victoria Street; and f. High sound walls are proposed which will reduce noise from the I-15 Freeway for future residents; and g. The excessive height of the sound walls will be mitigated by using split faced and fluted block and a two-toned color scheme; and h. The frontage improvements include construction of the East Avenue Parkway wall consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and i. Environmental impacts related to drainage, traffic, and noise will be mitigated to a level of less than significant. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 7and continued to June 21, 2000, including, but not limited to, written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-31, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows with reference to points raised by the appellant: a. That it would be infeasible for the developer to provide a buffer zone with herins and trees to control freeway noise because the extreme width of such a buffer zone would preclude development of the site consistent with Etiwanda Specific Plan permitted land uses; and b. While high walls proposed within the development may cause large shadow areas, these areas only impact homes within the project and any impact is offset by the noise attenuation function of the walls; and c. It is feasible to design and engineer walls high enough to effectively mitigate freeway noise; and d. The walls are designed with decorative masonry and include vine pockets with provisions for vine planting to grow onto the outside of the walls; and CITYCOUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. APPEAL OF DR 99-72 - BANKS June 21,2000 Page 3 e. The use of higher than normal walls has already been established as precedence for freeway noise mitigation elsewhere in the community. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 7, and continued to June 21,2000, and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that it includes high quality residential design appropriate to the Etiwanda area and will minimize noise levels from the 1-15 Freeway for residents within the tract; b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that it is responsive to the environmental resources of the site, promotes development compatible with surrounding uses, and minimizes the impact of high sound walls on the surround area; c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that it minimizes potential fire, seismic, and flood related hazards. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal, upholds the action of the Planning Commission, and approves the application subject to all conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-31, attached hereto. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Carlos Garcia with Ryland Homes and James Banks, at the addresses identified in City records. RESOLUTION NO. ~6"/b~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVING VARIANCE NO.99-11 TO ALLOW WALLS UP TO APPROXIMATELY 21 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR FREEWAY NOISE MITIGATION PURPOSES WHERE A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF SIX FEET IS ALLOWED LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS OF EAST AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT-OF- WAY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227-131-05 AND 227-141-11 AND 12. A. Recitals. 1. Ryland Homes has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 99-72, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinaffer in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 14th day of October 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting and approved Tentative Tracts 15911 and 15912 which are the sites of the current application. 3. On the 12th day of April 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 4. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolu~on was timely appealed to this Council. 5. On June 7, and continued to June 21, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 7, and continued to June 21, 2000, including, but not limited to, written and oral staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-32, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on both sides of East Avenue on the north and south sides of abandoned Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way with a street frontage of 1,240 feet on East Avenue and lot depth of 600 to 1,300 feet and is presently vacant; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. APPEAL OF VAR 99-11 - BANKS June 21, 2000 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and developed with single-family homes, the property to the south consists of vacant land and the 1-15 Freeway, the property to the east is vacant and the 1-15 Freeway, and the property to the west is vacant and developed with single-family homes; and c. The increase in wall height is necessary to reduce noise from the I-15 Freeway to an acceptable level for residential development; and d. The visual impact of the increase in wall height will be mitigatedby providing a two- tone color scheme and decorative wall material. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 7, 2000, including, but not limited to, written and oral staff repo~s, the minutes of the above*referenced Planning Commission meeting, the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 00-32, and together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows with reference to points raised by the appellant: a. That it would be infeasible for the developer to provide a buffer zone with berms and trees to control freeway noise because the extreme width of such a buffer zone would praclude development of the site consistent with Etiwanda Specific Plan permitted land uses; and b. While high walls proposed within the development may cause large shadow areas, these areas only impact homes within the project and any impact is offset by the noise attenuation function of the walls; and c. It is feasible to design and engineer walls high enough to effectively mitigate freeway noise; and d. The walls are designed with decorative masonry and include vine pockets with provisions for vine planting to grew onto the outside of the walls; and e. The use of higher than normal walls has already been established as precedence for freeway noise mitigation elsewhere in the community. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 7, and continued to June 21,2000, and upon thespecific findings of fact set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code in that the only alternative to mitigate freeway noise without exceeding the six foot wall height limit would be to construct very high earthen berms which would severely limit the site area available for residential development. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district in that the site is located adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway which generates substantial traffic noise. Freeway noise must be reduced to acceptable levels in order to permit residential development of the site consistent with noise thresholds established by the General Plan and the Development Code. THE CIIY ~ANCIIO OF CUCAMONGA St Report DATE: June 21, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01B - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for 22.9 acres of land located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 765 feet west of the intersection with Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-881-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA CQVlMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to change the Victoria Community Plan zoning designation from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4~ dwelling units per acre) for 22.9 acres of land located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 765 feet west of the intersection with Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-881-01. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 00-01B, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-01 and issuance of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts. Approval of these applications will establish aLow-Medium Residential land use designation for the property on the north side of Base Line Road directly opposite of the Regina Winery site. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission considered this General Plan Amendment 00-01A and associated Development District Amendment 00-01 at its meeting on May 24, 2000. The Planning Commission concluded its public hearing on May 24 and adopted the above listed recommendation. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission Report of May 24, 2000, regarding analysis of the proposed applications. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 00-01B,VCPA 00-01 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES June 21, 2000 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been completed. Staff has determined that no significant impacts would result from changing the land use designations as requested in the application. Environmental issues will be analyzed when formal development proposals are submitted for the future housing project. When specific development projects are proposed, existing environmental review requirements will be initiated to ensure adequate analysisof impacts. Any significant impacts noted will be mitigated through the City's development review process. Correspondence was received from the U.S. Fish and Wddlife Service citing concerns over potential endangered species and habitat in the general area of the subject property, Staff has sent a response to Fish and Wildlife explaining the City's position on the issues and reaffirming the finding of no negative environmental impacts because of the proposed applications. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site and including an expanded area to within 500 feet along the northerly property line. Circulators of petitions regarding the concerns of Tract 15677 were also mailed notices. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, May 19 2000 Exhibit "B" - Letter to U.S. Fish and Wddlife Service, May 31, 2000 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Report, May 24, 2000 Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment 00-01B Ordinance Approving Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-01 -2- United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Cadsbad Fish and Wildlife Office 2730 Loker Avenue West Cadsbad, California 92008 rlnll ~,t,~tlla,='~ Allen Warren Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 MAY 19 2000 Re: General Plan Amendment 00-01B and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-01, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Dear Mr. Warren: This letter provides our comments on General Plan Amendment 00-01B and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-01 for the proposed change of land use from medium residential to low- medium residential and subsequent development on 22.9 acres of land within the Victoria Community Plan. The proposed project is located north of Base Line Road and west of Victoria Park Lane in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, Califomia. We are concerned about the potential impacts of the proposed project to federally endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus, "SBKR") and threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica, "gnatcatcher") that occur within the vicinity of the project. We provide the following comments in keeping with our agency's mission to work "with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people." Moreover, we provide comments on public notices issued for a Federal permit or license affecting the Nation's waters pursuant to the Clean Water Act. We also administer the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Section 7 of the Act requires Federal agencies to consult with us, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), should it be determined that their actions may affect federally listed species. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the "take" (e.g., harm, harassment, pursuit, injury, kill) of federally listed wildlife. "Harm" is further defined to include habitat modification or degradation where it kills or injures wildlife by impairing .essential behavioral patterns including breeding, feeding, or sheltering. Take incidental to otherwise lawful activities can be authorized under sections 7 (Federal consultations) and I0 (habitat conservation plans) of the Act. According to the San Bernardino Natural History Museum records, SBKR are known to occur within the vicinity of the proposed project. Gnatcatchers have also been recorded within the proposed project vicinity as recent as this year. As a result, the zone change and subsequent development of the proposed project may result in take of federally listed wildlife. According to the negative declaration, the site has abandoned vineyards and some trees. Many such vineyards within the Rancho Cucamonga area are overgrown with sage scrub and provide Exhibit "A" Allen Warren 2 habitat for the gnatcatcher. If sage scrub occurs within these vineyards, we recommend that protocol surveys be conducted by a permitted biologist for the gnatcatcher prior to final approval of the proposed project. Moreover, trapping for the SBKR should be conducted to determine whether incidental take authorization under the Act is necessary for one or both of these federally listed species prior to any site disturbance. Issues related to potential significant impacts to biological resources on the proposed project site need to be adequately addressed. Due to urban and industrial development SBKR and gnatcatcher have declined throughout this area of San Bemardino County. The continued loss of SBKR- or gnatcatcher-occupied and suitable habitat should be considered significant under the California Environmental Quality Act and City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) should require proper avoidance measures or mitigation for the loss of these resources. The proposed project may significantly reduce the numbers and restrict the range of the SBKR and gnatcatcher now and in the future. We urge the City to address these potentially significant impacts to biological resources. We are concerned about potential impacts of the proposed project to raptors that use the area as foraging habitat, which may have significant cumulative effects to migratory and resident raptors. As a result, we recommend that cumulative impacts to raptors be addressed through participation and implementation of the Valley Wide Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan as outlined in the 1995 Memorandum of Understanding among us, the California Department of Fish and Game, and 15 additional local jurisdictions, including the City. In the interim, we recommend that the City require project proponents to mitigate onsite or offsite in a biologically viable manner to preserve or restore the loss of open, ruderal, and vacant land used as foraging habitat by raptors and other sensitive species. The acquisition of mitigation land should be contiguous with other appropriate habitat types, and provide habitat for SBKR, gnatcatcher, and raptors as appropri ate. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the proposed project. Since the proposed project may result in take of federally listed species, we request that these issues be resolved prior to final project approval. We are available to work with you and the project proponent to resolve the federally listed and other sensitive species issues on the project site. Please contact Mary Beth Woulfe of this office at (760) 431-9440, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim A. Bartel Assistant Field Supervisor I-6-00-NFTA-337 CO: CDFG, Chino Hills, CA (Attn: Glenn Black/Robin MaLoney Rames) City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning, CA (Attn: Larry Henderson) Charles Joseph Associates, Rancho Cucamonga, CA T H E C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONG May 31, 2000 A Jim A. Bartel, Assistant Field Supervisor U.S. Department of the Intedor Cadsbad Fish and Wildlife Office 2730 Loker Avenue West Cadsbad, CA 92008 RE: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01B AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00o01 Dear Mr. Badel: This letter is in response to your correspondence of May 19, 2000, regarding the subject land use amendment applications. I would like to address your general concerns over the sensitive habitat issues that you raised, as follows: While the site is in the vicinity of potentially sensitive habitats and endangered species, it is not in a location which would make the expansion and maintenance of these habitats viable. Some fragmented remnant alluvial fan sage scrub (in the form of coastal sage scrub) was noted on a site just west and to the north of the site as part of the biological assessment for the General Plan Amendment 96-03B Elk (certified in April 1998). That study concluded that the "coastal sage scrub is relatively poor in quality compared to this sor~ of habitat and similar alluvial scrub in the area." Further, it stated, "the habitat is not contiguous with other coastal sage scrub in the region. Roadways,. agricultural land uses, and developed areas separate the site from other areas of coastal sage scrub in the region that are located primarily to the north of the site." These impediments listed in the Elk are most appropriate to the site in question. The site is completely surrounded by suburban development as noted below: On the north side, beyond an unused rail line right-of-way, there is an established single-family neighborhood. On the east side, there is an apartment complex and a neighborhood retail commercial center. The southern boundary is Base Line Road, a major east-west arlerial through the community, and an existing historic winery is just opposite the site on the south side of the road. Along the western property line, there is a public storage facility that has been established since the initial beginnings of the Victoda Planned Community. With these surrounding activities, it does not seem likely that sage scrub could establish itself on this site and result in a significant addition to the sage scrub habitat. Also, the property owner has permitted the neighboring winery to harvest the vineyard from time to time. As a result, the vineyard on the site has not been allowed to become overgrown with non-agricultural plants. Due to the low quality of the nearby remnant coastal sage scrub and the lack of any amount on the site, we do not believe that the site presents an environment that would necessarily attract the gnatcatcher and kangaroo rat. Therefore, we do not believe one would expect these species to be present on the site. ~ Mayor William J, Alexander Mayor Pro-Tern Diane Williams Jack Lain, AICP, CHy Manager Councilmember Paul Biane Councilmember Bob Duffon Councilmember James V. Curatalo 10500 Civic Center Drive · RO. Box 807 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 · (909) 477-2700 · FAX (909) 477-2849 www. ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us Exhibit JIM A. BARTEL GPA 00-01 B & VCPA 00o01 May 31, 2000 Page 2 The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), signed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to cooperate in the development of a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for the San Bemardino Valley does establish interim review guidelines for projects proceeding while the MSHCP is under development. The interim project review guidelines state that the recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are advisory; the final decision of whether to approve, modify, or deny a project remains in the hands of the lead agency (in this case, the City of Rancho Cucamonga), pursuant to existing laws. The interim review guidelines state that each lead agency shall determine whether a project shall be reviewed pursuant to the guidelines. Furlher, the lead agency retains discration to determine that a project is within the plan area, and because of the project's characteristics, it has no impact on the viability of biological resources and would not preclude long-term preservation planning. The applications under consideration, if approved, will not result in authorization for any specific development. This is simply a land use change (General Plan and Zoning) for the purposes of planning the eventual development scheme for the immediate area. Additional environmental assessment will be required when a development proposal is presented to the City for consideration. City staff believes that the land use proposal for the site will not result in any development/activity more intensive than that of the current land use designation. It is believed that the less intense Low-Medium Residential at 4-8 dwelling units/acre will result in a residential development with reduced impacts than the present designation of 8-14 dwelling units/acre. It is the conclusion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, due to the lack of any scientific evidence of coastal sage scrub habitat on the site and the poor quality of the coastal sage scrub habitat in the general area, the project will not result in significant impacts to this habitat type. In addition, due to the .... poor quality of habitat and .the distance and _fr_agmentation~of_ .the. area,. andJ~abitats_from _the North _: Etiwanda Preserve and surrounding buffer lands, it is the conclusion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the project has no impact on the viability of biological resources and will not preclude long-term preservation planning. Therefore, it is concluded that mitigation measures, including those recommended by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (i.e., protocol surveys, mitigation land bank, etc.), are not warranted for the site. Thank you for your interest in the project. If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 477-2750, extension 4304, Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Sincerely. Alan Warren, AICP Associate Planner AVWna CC: City Planner Principal Planner Charles Buquet, Chades Joseph Associates RESOLUTION NO. ~¢)(~) '/~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01B, A REQUESTTO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 22.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 765 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-881-01. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates has filed an application on behalf of D.R. Horton and Mark Taylor Corporation for General Plan Amendment 00-01 B, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment by the adoption of Resolution No. 00-49. 3. On June 21,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct, 2, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 21, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 22.9 acres of land, a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 765 feet west of Victoria Park Land, which is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is an unused railroad rightof-way, and beyond that is Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), which is developed with a single-family neighborhood. The property to the west is designated Medium and is developed with a public storage facility. The property to the east is designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Neighborhood Commercial and is developed with an apartment complex and a neighborhood retail center, The property to the south is designated High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with the historic Regina Winery; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 00-01B - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES JUNE 21, 2000 Page 2 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the LandUse Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area by satisfying the minimum parcel size requirement for the land use designation and continuing the single-family residential development pattern along the north side of Base Line Road; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions listed in the Initial Study Parts I and II; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by providing a land use pattern that is complementary with nearby parcels of land. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached herato, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application, b. That based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 00-01B - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES JUNE 21, 2000 Page 3 5. Based-upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs ;I, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 00-01B designating the subject site as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) as shown in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2000 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FR x GPA 00-01B -General Plan Land Use Map Change to Low-Medium Residential railroad right-of-way ....... ., .::: ~,,, :::::i [Medium-High~',~,,,. ~' -. I~GPA SIte GP Land Use Designations LJCOMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROI. JUTIUTY CORRIDOR ~ HIGH ~ LOW []~::DIUM ~ MEDIUM NIGN ER ~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMM CIAL no scale ORD, A CE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01, CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 22.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDEOF BASE LINE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 765 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION WITH VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGSIN SUPPORTTHEREOF - APN: 227-881-01 A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates has filed an application on behalf of DR Hodon and Mark Taylor Corporation for Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoda Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment 00-01B and recommended to the City Council that the associated general plan amendment be appreved by the adoption of Resolution No. 00-49. 3. On May 24, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended its approval by the adoption of Resolution No. 00-50, 4. On June 21, 2000 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment 00-01B and concluded said public hearing by adopting the general plan amendment. 5. On June 21,2000 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Victoria Community Plan Amendment 00-01. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. ,, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 21, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 22.9 acres of land, basically a rectilinear configuration, located on the north side of Base Line Road, approximately 765 feet west of Victoria Park Land, which is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Medium Resi~bntial (8-14 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Community Plan; and b. The property to the north of the subject. site is an unused railroad righ~of-way, and beyond that is Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), which is developed with a single-family neighborhood. The property to the west is designated Medium and is developed with a public storage facility. The property to the east is designated Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Neighborhood Commercial and is developed with an apartment complex and a neighborhood retail center. The property to the south is designated High Residential (24-39 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with the historic Regina Winery; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and of the Victoria Community Plan, and; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area by satisfying the minimum parcel size requirement for the land use designation and continuing the single-family residential development pattern along the north side of Base Line Road; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions listed in the Initial Study Parts I and II; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by providing a land use pattern that is complementary with nearby parcels of land. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VCPA 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 24, 2000 Page 3 independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this CommisSion has rev ewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community PlanAmendment No. 00-01 to change the land use designation to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Community Plan as shown on Exhibit "A" of this ordinance 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. m VCPA 00-01 - Victoria Community Plan X Land Use Map Low-Medium Residential i.:.:iili!i!iiii!IL-' [] VCPA Site I tl ' ~ HIGH r~ LOW LOW MEDj~M IAL MEDIUM MEDIUM GH VILLAGE COMMERC no scale TH E C ITY 0 F ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA S /fReport DATE: June 21,2000 TO.' Mayor and Member of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Commercial and Medium- High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, Development District Amendment 00-01, and Development Agreement 00-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the Development District zoning designation from General Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use, and the establishment of a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), including deviation from certain development standards for the residential portion of the base district, on 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and Development Agreement 00-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-01 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Northtown Housing Development Corp. for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27,020.040 of the Development Code) including deviation from certain development standards for 80-96 senior apartment units and one manager unit on a Mixed Use site of 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Loreira Drive - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and Development District Amendment 00-01. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 00-01A, DCA 00-01, DA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14,2000 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 00-01A, Development District Amendment 00-01, Development Agreement 00-01 and issue a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts. Approval of these applications will establish a Mixed Use land use designation with a Senior Housing Overlay District for the property on the east site of Amethyst Avenue, north of Lomita Drive. BACKGROUND: At its May 24, 2000 meeting, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission considered the subject applications. The applications were initiated by the Northtown Housing Development Corporation to provide appropriate land use designation for a senior housing project at the Redevelopment Agency's property on Amethyst Avenue. The adoption of this amendment, along with the adoption of associated Development Code Amendment 00-01, will provide the required development regulations for a senior housing project within a Mixed Use district. The Planning Commission concluded its public hearing on June 14, 2000 and adopted the above listed recommendation. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission Report of May 24 and June 14, 2000 regarding analysis of the proposed applications. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been completed. Staff has determined that no significant impacts would result from changing the land use designations as requested in the application. Environmental issues will be analyzed when formal development proposals are submitted in the future. When specific development projects are proposed, existing environmental review requirements will be initiated to ensure adequate analysis of impacts. Any significant impacts noted will be mitigated through the City's development review process. City Planner BB:AW:Is Attachments: Planning Commission Staff reports dated May 24 and June 14, 2000 Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment 00-01A Ordinance Adopting Development District Amendment 00-01 Ordinance Adopting Development Agreement 00-01 c2/ ~ H ~ANCHO CITY OF CUCAHONGA Staff Report DATE: June 14, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Commercial and Medium- High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Loreira Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site- APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, Development District Amendment 00- 01, and Development Agreement 00-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP.- A request to change the Development District zoning designation from General Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use, and the establishment of a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), including deviation from certain development standards for the residential portion of the base district, on 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Loreira Drive. The Citywill also consider Medium- High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202;151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and Development Agreement 00-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00- 01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Northtown Housing Development Corp. for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.020.040 of the Development Code) including deviation from certain development standards for 80-96 senior apartment units and one manager unit on a Mixed Use site of 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Loreira Drive - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 00-01A, DCA 00-01, DA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN'HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14, 2000 Page 2 Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and Development District Amendment 00-01. BACKGROUND: The public hearings on these items are continued from the May 24, 2000, Planning Commission meeting. At the meeting, staff presented the analysis of the land use issues along with explanations of the proposed Development Code provisions to enact the Mixed Use District. The Commissioners present at the last meeting were inclined to favor the Mixed Use designation with a Medium-High Residential component as long as it was proposed as part of a senior residence project. Because the Development Agreement for the Senior Overlay Housing District was not ready for consideration, the items were continued to this meeting. No public comments were received at or prior to the May 24, 2000, meeting. Please note the following items were incorrectly listed in the May 24, 2000, report: In the third sentence of the Project Density section, it should read, ".. . . be applied to the Medium-High Residential component to permit the development of senior apartments and one manager unit to occupy the entire site." In the end of the last paragraph, it should read, ".., the unit count could be as high as .~6 9~ units. In the third and fourth sentences of the General section underANALYSIS, it should read, "As stated above, the maximum residential units count for the site under the proposed land use is 77 and ~ 9__7 with a SHOD. The current amount of multiple family land within the site would allow for 13 to 23 units under the base designation and-t.6 up to 29 units with a SHOD." Since all the items were continued, the May 24, 2000, report is attached for the Commissioners' reference. Because an adjustment was made in the amount of density bonus units, from a preliminary concept amount of 80 to the full 25 percent bonus, a new Environmental Assessment was circulated and the Development Agreement application was re-advertised, with an amended description, for this meeting. This report will focus on the Development Agreement for the Senior Housing Overlay District. ANALYSIS: Senior Housin¢l Overlay District and Development A~reement: It is the applicant's intent to fully develop the property with a 100 percent senior housing project. The Development Agreement has been drafted to satisfying minimum income levels of 80 percent of the median annual income of the SHOD provisions. In a separate Regulatory Agreement with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, the property owner has agreed to low cost housing levels that exceed (providing 30, 45 and 50 percent of the Annual Median Income levels) the housing provisions of the Development Code. Reference to this Regulatory Agreement is included in the SHOD Development Agreement. With this proposal, the Office option would not be a part of the development. With this intent, a request for a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) has been included in order for the future development to benefit from revised standards that are appropriate for senior housing projects. The applicanrs initial plan called for 81 total units, well below the 25 percent density bonus that can be authorized under SHOD provisions. Because the plan has not been submitted for Design Review, the applicant has requested that the agreement provide for the full 25 percent bonus to provide flexibility in the design process. At this percentage, the site PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 00-01A, DCA 00-01, DA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14, 2000 Page 3 could be permitted 97 units. The Agreement calls for the minimum of .7 parking spaces per senior unit (as authorized in SHOD code provisions), and one (1) space for the manager's unit, ith the eventual parking count subject the Development Review process. Staff is recommending between .7 and one (1) parking space per senior units, and two (2) spaces for the managers unit. The .7 spaces are expected to be sufficient, but staff would like to be able to consider up to one (1) space per unit if, in the final design, significant two bedroom units are proposed. Reductions in open space, setbacks from drive aisles, etc., are in keeping with previous SHOD agreements, and can be considered in the Development Review process. The application of SHOD standards will only affect the residential portion of the Mixed Use category. Refer to the Development Agreement Resolution and its attachments to review the specifics of the agreement. The site satisfies the location requirements of the SHOD by having, within walking distance, various services such as food shopping, drug stores, banks, medical and dental facilities, and public transit. These facilities are located at intersections of Base Line Road and Amethyst Street, and Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been completed and the Notice of Intent re-circulated for all the applications. Staff has determined that no significant impacts would result from changing the land use designations as requested in the application. Environmental issues will need to be analyzed when formal development proposals are submitted in the future. When specific development projects are proposed, existing environmental review requirements will be initiated to ensure adequate analysis of impacts. Any significant impacts noted will be mitigated through the City's development review process. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius, and including an expanded area beyond the 300-foot radius, of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment 00-01A, Development District Amendment 00-01, and Development Agreement 00-01 by adoption of the attached Resolutions. Brad Buller City Planner BB:AVV~ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report, May 24, 2000 Exhibit "B" - Draft Minutes for Planning Commission Meeting, May 24, 2000 Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 00-01A Resolution Recommending Adoption of Development District Amendment 00-01 THE CITY OF ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA St/fffReport DATE: May 24, 2000 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Commercial and Medium- High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, Development District Amendment 00-01, and Development Agreement 00-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request 1o change the Development District zoning designation from General Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use, and the establishment of a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD), including deviation from certain development standards for the residential portion of the base district, on 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01 A, and Development Agreement 00-01. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-01 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A Development Agreement between tt'ie City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Northtown Housing Development Corp. for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.020.040 of the Development Code) including deviation from certain development standards for 80 senior apartment units and one manager unit on a Mixed Use site of 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01 A, and Development District Amendment 00-01. c /7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 00-01 A, DCA 00-01, DA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 2000 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Project Densit,/: The applications are a request to change the land use General Plan and Development District designations to Mixed Use categories that would permit the development of the subject site to all Medium-High Residential, all Office, or a mix of the two. The site is presently divided between Medium-High Residential (.95 acres - 29.3 percent) and Commercial (2.29 acres - 70.7 percent) designations. With the amended land use designations, the applicant is also requesting a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) be applied to the Medium Residential component to permit the development of senior apartments and one manager unit to occupy the entire site. Under the Medium-High component (100 percent of the site), 45 to 77 multiple family units could be permitted. With a density bonus (up to 25 percent) that can be authorized with a SHOD, the unit count could be as high as 96 units. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonincl: North - - Alta Loma Elementary School - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South & East - Small commercial shops, unused railroad corridor, water storage facility and multiple family residential complex - General Commercial and Medium High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) West Small commercial shops and a single-family residential neighborhood - General Commercial and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Nodh South East West General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Elementary school Railroad and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Railroad and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Commercial and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) De Site Characteristics: The site is mostly level, slopping gently to the south, and it has several trees in the northeast and southeast corners of the site. The site has been cleared under a previous demolition permit of an old citrus packinghouse. ANALYSIS: General: The request proposes to change a 3.24 acres parcel that is roughly divided between Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use. The Mixed Use designation for this property is drafted to permit 0-100 percent Commercial and 0-100 percent Medium-High Residential. As stated above, the maximum residential units count for the site under the proposed land use is 77 and 95 with a SHOD. The current amount of multiple family land within the site would allow for 13 units under the base designation and 16 units with a SHOD. The current designations do not permit the development of the entire site for multiple family uses. Appropriateness of Existina Land Use Desianations: The front two-third's of the site is designated Commercial, which is complementary with existing commercial sites along both sides of Amethyst Street. Expansion of this portion with retail shops would enhance the historic downtown Alta Loma with new commercial growth. The commercial portion, however, blocks the Medium-High Residential portion from any street frontage. This arrangement could make the development of the easterly portion difficult with no inherent development standards to work with the two dissimilar uses. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 00-01A, DCA 00-01, DA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 2000 Page 3 Appropriateness of Proposed Desiqnation: The division of the proposed Mixed Use District is 0-100 percent Office and 0-100 percent Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre). From the non-residential standpoint, the Office portion offers a reduction in land use intensity with most retail uses permitted being only in support of office activities. The multiple family portion will expand significantly in area and, as a result, in the number of potential units, The intensity of residential development (units per acre) will not be affected. The application of development standards will be guided by those amendments enacted by the accompanying Development Code Amendment 00-01. Senior Housinq Overlay District and Development Aqreement: It is the applicant's intent to fully develop the property with a 100 percent senior housing project. The Development Agreement has be drafted to satisfying minimum income levels of 80 percent of the median annual income, of the SHOD provisions. In a separate Regulatory Agreement with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, the property owner has agreed to low cost housing levels that exceed (providing 30, 45, and 50 percent of the Annual Median Income levels) the housing provisions of the Development Code. Reference to this Regulatory Agreement will be included in the SHOD Development Agreement. With this proposal, the Office option would not be a part of the development. With this intent, a request for a Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) has been included in order for the future development to benefit from revised standards that are appropriate for senior housing projects. The senior housing project will exceed the density limits but will be within the SHOD's 25 percent bonus limit. Staff is recommending between .7 and 1 parking space per senior units and 2 spaces for the manager's unit. Reductions in open space, setbacks from drive aisles, etc., are in keeping with previous SHOD agreements, as well as providing for retention of the affordable housing features. The application of SHOD standards will only affect the residential portion of the Mixed Use category. Refer to the Development Agreement Resolution and its attachments to review the specifics of the agreement. The site satisfies the location requirements of the SHOD by having, within walking distance, various services such as food shopping, drug stores, banks, medical and dental facilities, and public transit. These facilities are located at intersections of Base Line Road and Amethyst Street, and Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road. The Development Agreement is still being revised and the applicant has requested that it be reviewed on June 14, 2000. Because of proposed changes, the item will be re-advertised for the June 14 meeting. Alternatives: The alternatives listed for review are the two land uses, Medium-High Residential and Office, that being considered in the Mixed Use scenario. With only Medium-High Residential (minimum lot size of 3 acres), the site could be developed as a senior housing project as outlined in Item's "A" and "D" and with a SHOD. A total Office designation could result in a development of approximately 35,000 square feet of floor area without the possibility of any residential component. With the site a significant distance off Base Line Road it does not seem likely that this amount of office space will be possible without a great deal more commercial activity in the area. In addition, with a large part of the site tucked some 700 feet off Amethyst Street, the site's viability for this amount of office development is questionable. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 00-01A, DCA 00-01, DA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. May 24, 2000 Page 4 The main benefits for the Mixed Use designation are as follows: The "hard dividing line" between a multiple family project and office project is not required in the Mixed Use. Architects will be required to design internal compatibility between the two uses and associated site facilities, which can make the concerns of multiple uses more acceptable. 2. The mix of varying uses would allow the developer to provide the most viable blend of activities on the site. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and IT of the Initial Study have been completed. Staff has determined that no significant impacts would result from changing the land use designations as requested in the application. Environmental issues will need to be analyzed when formal development proposals are submitted in the future for the senior housing project. When specific development projects are proposed, existing environmental review requirements will be initiated to ensure adequate analysis of impacts. Any significant impacts noted will be mitigated through the City's development review process. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the properly was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius, and including an expanded area beyond the 300-foot radius, of the project site. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: A neighborhood meeting was held on the evening of May 16, 2000, at the Lions West Community Center. The applicant invited those property owners listed for the public hearing notice. Three area property owners were in attendance along with the project architect, applicant representative, RDA and Planning staff members, and Mayor Pro Tem Diane Willlares. Questions that where raised regarded the cost of the property and project, rental rates, who would manage the senior project, and whether the City will make any money from the project. RDA staff addressed these questions. No one spoke against the project concept. Concerns were brought up regarding potential increase in traffic congestion near the elementary school. The architect stated that special design considerations will be studied for the project's access points when the precise site plan is proposed through the City's design review process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive testimony and discuss General Plan Amendment 00-01A and Development District Amendment 00-01A and continue those items to June 14, 2000, for action in conjunction with the Development Agreement. Staff also recommends that the Commission continue Development Agreement 00-01 to be re-advertised for June 14, 2000. City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan Land Use Map Exhibit "B" - Development District Map Exhibit "C" - Initial Study Resolution Recommending of Approval General Plan Amendment 00-01A Resolution Recommending Approval of Development District Amendment 00-01 FR GPA 00-01A- Existing General Plan Land Use iiiiiiiiii!ii !!A00-01A RDA Sen~or Housing Stte ~ ~ ~ s:..=;,, :::::::::: :~: :::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: $$$$$$$* .~' t. !:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~-~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~::~::~;:~:~:~::~::~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,:::::::::::-- ..=== :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..:.....:::~:~;~;~;~::;:"~;?'~',~,:~:,:~,~':~::: Baseline Rd. I~ RDA site GP Land Use Designations ~ COMMERCIAL ~ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ~ HIGH ~ LOW ~ MEDIUM ~ MEDIUM HIGH ~ MIXED USE ~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ~ OFFICE no scale rrl x DDA 00-01 Existing Development District Map :::::::::::::::::::::: Mediun~High :::::::::::::::::::.: DDA 00-01 Residenlial E EiiEiEEiEEEEE i EiiEEE:. RDA Senior Housing Site Lomita Dr. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-:-:-:-:-:-L-Z-Z-:-L-:-:-L.L.:-~-~.~-~-~-~.~-~.~-~-E-~-:-.-. ....... ....... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ...............,,...f.::.::.:~::.::.:::::--....:=:~................... . ...-.,..,......~..... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: '~ .. Baseline ~ RDA site GP Land Use Designations E'~ COMMERCIAL GENERAL ~ HIGH ~ LOW ~ MEDIUM ~ MEDIUM HIGH ~ MIXED USE ~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ~ OFFICE/PROFESSIONAL no scale N City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division (909) 477-2750 NVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. · . GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICA TIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that ir is the msponsibi~ty of the applicant to ensure that the app~cation is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. ApplicationNumberfortheprejecttowhichthisforrnpertains: (~10/~ O0-DI,/I / OD,~ oo-ol, D,~ co-o( ProjectTitle: Name&Addressofprejectowner(s): Ms. Linda Daniels, CA 91730 Senior Apartment Project Redevelopment Agency, City of Rancho Cucamonqa, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Name&Addressofdeveloperorprejectsponsor Northtown Housing Development Corp., Mr. Nacho Gracia, 9999 Feron Blvd., Ste. A, Rancho Cucamon~a, CA 91730 ContactPerson&Address: Telephone Number ( 909 ) Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Peter J. Pitassi, AIA, Architect 8439 White Oak Ave., Ste. 105 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 980-1361 Same as above Telephone Number INITSTD1 .WPD o 4/96 Page 1 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP'S unless otherwise requested by staff. Provide a full scale (8- I/'2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries, Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views int__o the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access poinls which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site, Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) ProjectLocation(describe): East side of Amethyst Street, north of Baseline Road 4) Assessor~s Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 202-141-12 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq, ft.): 3.24 acres Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 3,2 4 a c r e s Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary: This application will remove the existing "GC" and "MH" designations from the site and establish a Mixed Use land use and zoning category, permitting a potential mix of multiple family (0 to 100% land ratio) and office (0 to 100% land ratio) uses over the entire site. A "SHOD" will also be requested for any residential portion Includeadescfip~onofa~permitswhichwillbenecessary f~mtheCityofRanchoCucamongaandothergoverementalOn th agenciesinordertofullyimplementtheproject: site. Design Review Approval, Grading Plan, Building Permits, STreet Improvement Permits. INITSTD1 .VVPD - 4/96 Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability. p/ants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features descrbed. In addition, site all sources of information (i. e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheological surveys, traffic studies): The site has been clea~ed under previous permit for demolition of the old packing house. There are several trees in the northeast and southwest corners of the site. These will be retained if possible. 10) Descrbe the known cultural and/or historcal aspects of the slle. Site all soumes of informafion (books, published reports and oral history): The site was home to the Alta Loma Citrus Heights Packing House which provided sorting, packing, and shippinq of citrus from local growers. 11) Desc~be any n~ise s~urces and their ~eve~s that n~w a~ec~ the site (aircraf~~ r~adway n~ise~ etc.) and h~w they will affect proposed uses: None. INITSTD1 .WPD - 4~96 Page~c~ .~ Descdbe ~e pmposed p~e~ ~ de~fl. ~ shou~ pmvide an a~qua~ ~sc~n of ~e site ~ ~rms of ultima~ use which will msu~ ~m ~e pmaed pmje~. Indica~ ~ ~em am pmposed phases ~r ~velopmen~ the ex~nt of ~velopment ~ occur with each phase, and ~e anticipated comp~n of each ~cmmenL A~ch additional sheet~ ~ necessa~ With this application it is the applicant's intention to eventually develop senior apartments. The General Plan Amendment and Development District Amendment will allow this type of development for the entire site, or any portion thereof. The combined applications include a request for a "Senior Housing Overlay District" for any residential portion of the site. The Mixed Use categories, as Presently drafted (0-100% multiple family and 0-100% office), will also permit the use of the property for office development. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histo~ca/, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): This site is in the historic "downtown" of old Alta Loma. It is a mixed use area with single family homes, small businesses, and Alta Loma Elementary School. ~/~theprop~sedprojectchangethepattem~sca~e~rcharacter~fthesun-~unding`qenera~area~fthepr~ject? No, the pattern will be enhanced. Senior citzzens will be located in an established area with access to transportation, local retail sites, and services. ~ny oEf~ d~v~lnpm~n~ ~Rn hp ~nmp~hl~ w~h ~h~ p~ng dnwn~nwn commercial character by following the City's development review nearby developed areas. An office development on this site iould still has retail shops and offices in use. INITSTD1 .WPD - 4~96 Page 4 15) Indicate the type of short-term end long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise le ve/s affect adjacent properties and on-site uses, What methods of eound pmofing are proposed? No significant noise sources will be created with this proposal. '1~ Indicatepmposedremovalsand/orreplacementsofmatureorscenictrees: None. Indicateanybodiesofwater(includingdomesHcwatersupplies)intowhichthesitedrains: Drainage will be accommodated by local storm drains. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distrfct at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 32,400 Peak use (galADay) 64,800 e 3300% or b. Commercial/Ind.(gal/day/ac) 9720 gal/day peakuse(gal/min/ac)'lg,440 gal/day e 100% 19) Indicate preposed method of sewage disposaL Septic Tank x Sewer. If septic tanks ara proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitaq/ sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). Forfudher cladfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distffct at 98 7-2 591. a. Residential (gal/day) 16,200 gal/day b. Commercialfind. (gal/day/ac) 6,480 gal/day RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of rasidential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: INITSTD1 .WPD - 4~96 Page 5 ,Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 80 rental senior apartments with 1 manager's apartment 21) Anticipated range of sale pdces and/or rents: Sale Pdce(s) $ Rent (per month) $ 220.00 22) Speci~numberofbedroomsbyunittype: 72 1 bedroom, 1 bath units 8 2 bedroom, 2 bath units to $ to $ 476. O0 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: We assume 1.5 persons/bedroom 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing wilhin the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: N · A · b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Desc~betypeofuse(s) andmajorfunction(s)ofcommemial, industdalorinstitu~onaluses: The site could be developed as an office use with on site parktnq. 26) Total~ooramaofcommerciaLindustdaLorinsfitutionalusesbytype: Approximately 50,000-60,000 sq, ft, of office space could possibly be accommodated with on site parking, INITSTD1 .WPD - 4/96 Page 6 27) Indicate hours of operation: Normal Business Hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. would be anticipated. 28) Number of employees: 29) Total: Office use could support 125-140 occupants Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessaO,): Unknown at this time. 3~ EstimationofthenumberofworkerstobehiredthatcurrentlyresideintheCitY: Unknown at this time. '31) For commercial and indust~al uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions, (Data should be ve~fied through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): No siqnificant source. ALL PROJECTS 32) Havethewater~sewer~llre~and~~~dc~ntre~agenciesservingthepmjectbeenc~ntactedt~determinetheirabi~ityt~pr~vide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response, All services are available and able to serve the site. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other fiammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. None which we are aware of at this time. 34) I/viII the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic mateHa/s, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventor7 of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposaL The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. NO tements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and be/ief.//fiurther uncle ~ that ional infon~ation may be required to be submitted Tit ~ ,._, City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project Files: General Plan Amendment 00-01 A, Development District Amendment 00-01, Development Agreement 00-01 2. Related Files: Development Code Amendment 00-01 Description of Project: A request to change the General Plan and Development District land use designations from Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Commercial to Mixed Use with allowances for 0-100 percent Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) 0-100 percent Office land use development with a Senior Housing Overlay District for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of Lomita Drive and accompanying Development Agreement - APN: 202-151-12. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Northtown Housing Development Corp. 9999 Feron Boulevard, #A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Commercial 6. Zoning: Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Commercial Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: On the north side there is an existing elementary school, on the east there is multiple family housing, and an unused rail line, on the south there is an unused rail line, commercial shops and water storage facilities, and to the west there is a old single family neighborhood and commercial shops. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Alan Warren, AICP (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x) Land Use and Planning (x) Population and Housing (x) Geological Problems (x) Water (x) Air Quality (x) Transportation/Circulation (x) Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Hazards (x) Noise ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance (x) Public Services ( ) Utilities and Service Systems (x)Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources (x) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier FIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: Al'~ar~arren, A~lCp Associate Planner April 27, 2000 initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Potentially Significar~t Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incofl)orated Impact Impact LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) (x) () b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? () () (x) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? () ( ) (x) d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? () (x) ( ) Commen~: a-d) The application is requesting land use changes for a 3.24 acre parcel that is presently designated with a split land use and zoning designations of Medium High and Commercial. The GPA and DDA actions will permit these uses to be developed on the property, but without a hard line delineating the potential separation of the uses. The applicant's intent is to develop 100 percent of the site as a senior housing project with 80 senior units and one manager unit. The Mixed Use designation is new to the immediate area; however, the allowance for Medium-High Residential uses and Office uses is not too much different from the nearby single-family, multiple family, and historic Alta Loma commercial activities. The potential mix of multiple family and office uses on the same site can present inherent design difficulties when trying to provide compatible land use relationships. The City's design review process will provide the avenue to ensure that appropriate design criteria is used in the approved project plan. If developed at 100 percent senior housing, then the compatibility concerns will be significantly reduced. Potentially Issues and Supporling Information S~rCeS: Significant Impact POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) No ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 4 Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-b) No construction approval will result from this application. The application has been made in anticipation of the owner~s submitting a senior housing project. Construction activities at the site will be shod-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The proposed project will result in 80 senior housing units and one manager's unit in the Medium-High Density Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project expands the potential residential use of the site to the full 3.24 acres. Through the GPA process and the residential nature of the nearby area, this project will not result in a significant increase in population not otherwise planned by the City in its forecasts. c) The site is currently void of any structures. No existing housing is located on-site. Issues and Suppealing Information Sources: GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) b) C) d)' e) f) g) h) i) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) () (x) (x) ( ) (x) ( ) ) (x) ) (x) (X) (x) (x) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 5 Comments: a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 4 miles east of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing M,~ 6.0 - 7.0 earthquakes, respectively. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to M,~7.5 earthquakes is 7 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M,~ 8.2 earthquakes, is 12.5 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The site is not located near a large body of water. e) The site is relatively flat, and it is not near any slopes vulnerable to mass-wasting events. f-h) The site is relatively flat so grading will be minimal. Grading will even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage and avoid erosion. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Building and Safety Division will require a soils report. New structures are required to meet current earthquake standards as required by the Uniform Building Code. The impact is not considered significant. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. It was once the site of a major packinghouse that was built during the expansion of the area's citrus growing industry. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) d) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significam Mitigation Significant No ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) () () (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant impact Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant Incorporated Impact No g) h) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a) Development with impervious surfaces will affect the rate and amount of surface water runoff. This land use amendment should not significantly affect the amount of change anticipated in previous environmental analysis of the existing land use plans. b) The site is not located within any 100-year flood plain. A 100-year flood area is about a 1/2 mile north of the site that is partially contained within an under ground drain and surface drainage channel. The 100-year flood area does not extend to the site. c-e) The project site is not located near a body of water. Storm-water runoff will be conveyed to the existing public storm drain system as approved by the City Engineer. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area because the site is not used for groundwater recharging. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO AIR QUALITY. Would the proposah a) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) d) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-b) Development will affect the amount of air pollution in the general area. This land use amendment should not significantly affect the amount of change anticipated in previous environmental analysis of the existing land use plans. initial Study for GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 c-d) After the land use amendment is approved, it is the applicant's intent to propose a project to construct 80 senior residences and one manager unit on 3.24 acres. This will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. Issues and Supporting Information S~rces: TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No (x) () ( ) (x) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) () (x) (X) Comments: a) As a result of development, additional vehicle and pedestrian traffic will occur because the site is presently vacant. Similar increases would also occur if the property were to develop under the existing land use categories. No significant increase in traffic is anticipated from development under the amended land use categories. Similar increases would also occur if the property were to develop under the existing land use categories. No significant increase in traffic is anticipated from development under the amended land use categories. Since vehicle traffic is generally less for a senior housing project, the new traffic levels should actually be less than under any multiple family/commercial development authorized under the present land use categories. b-f) The future senior housing development proposal will be required to meet the City's existing street development policies and no significant impacts are anticipated. g) No rail impacts are anticipated. The site is, however, adjacent to a former rail line that is owned by SANBAG, the local council of governments. This land is being held by SANBAG as a potential light rail transit mute if such a transportation service is warranted in the future. If the rail line is revitalized, the City will work with SANBAG to ensure that design features are incorporated in to the transit system that mitigates significant impacts to the adjoining properties. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 8 Issues and Suppoding ]nformaticn Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? () () () (x) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? () () () (x) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comrflellts; a) The site is not identified on the City's special habitat areas map for special environmental analysis. b-c) The site is an abandoned citrus packinghouse site with some mature trees along the northern boundary to the east. During the Design Review process for the proposed senior housing project the health of the trees should be investigated and efforts should be made to retain them within the ultimate project design d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site. e) The project site is cut off from healthy, undisturbed native habitats and bands of non- native vegetation. It is not in a migration corridor. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.' a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? e) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? () () () (X) (X) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 9 Comments: a-b) The project will not conflict with any energy conservation plans nor be wasteful. c) The project site is not located near any known mineral resource. Issues and SuppoRing Infomnation Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO Impact Inco~)orated Impact Impact HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments,' An environmental closure report was generated for the site when the citrus packing house was demolished. The analysis of the soil samples "indicated that no local, State or Federal hazardous waste levels were encountered on the soil during the (consultants) investigation." b) Any future development will be required to be designed to accommodate emergency vehicles. e) The site is not located in a fire hazard area. 10. Issues and Supporiing Inforrr~ation Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Signilicant NO NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 10 Comments: a) The site is presently vacant and generates no noise levels. After development with a housing project, noises associated with single family housing projects is expected. This level is expected to be less than significant to the surrounding area's ambient noise levels. b) Any future residential project could be affected by noise generated from a reused rail road right-of-way that borders the south property line. Through the City's Design Review process, mitigation measures will be required of any multiple-family project developed under the Medium-High Residential standards. 11. issues and Supix>ffin(} Inforrr~tion Sources: PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) b) c) d) e) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO Impact Inconcorated Impact Impact Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Schools? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Cornmerits: a-e) The project site is in an area originally zoned Medium-High Residential and Commercial. The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan for services was based on the assumption this parcel would have 14-24 dwellings per acre for about half of the site and commercial on the remaining portion. The project site, if changed as proposed, will result in 100 percent of the site as an 81 unit senior housing project that should not significantly affect public service needs. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project. No mitigation is required. Fire and Police protection - Additional protection will be required for the increased population and number of homes. However, as the project requires fewer resources than are accommodated within the General Plan, the impact is less than significant. Schools - Most any multiple family projects will generate additional students. The number of students generated by a senior project of 81 total units, however, should be significantly less, if not zero than the amount generated by a multiple family development under the existing land use categories. The eventual senior housing project will incrementally decrease the need for schools while still providing for increased population growth. Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fees established by the school district, the developer will pay all appropriate development impact fees. Initial Study for GPA 00-01 A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Parks - The proposed project will incrementally increase the need for park and recreation services through the potential for increased population growth. Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council, the developer will pay all appropriate development impact fees. Public facilities -The proposed project will incrementally increase traffic on adjacent streets. Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council, the developer will pay all appropriate development impact fees. 12. Issues and Supporling Information Sources: UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) b) c) d) f) g) Power or natural gas? Communication systems? Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste disposal? Local or regional water supplies? Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ) ( ) ( ( ) (x) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) Comments: a-g) The residential development anticipated to be built after the land use change will include the construction of 80 senior units and one manager's unit. The proposed development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area. The proposed project will not require major modifications or alterations to the existing utility systems. 13. Issues and Supporting information Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significanl NO AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.' a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 12 Comments: a-b) The surrounding area is developed and includes other residential neighborhoods. Any future housing development will blend with existing surroundings. c) Any future project will create new light and glare, as the site is currently vacant. Low pressure sodium vapor lights should be used to minimize excess glare while creating safe lighting conditions. Landscaping will be in accordance with City landscaping requirements for residential neighborhoods and will buffer the site. The impact is not considered significant. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) b) C) Disturb paleontological resources? Disturb archaeological resources? Affect historical or cultural resources? () () () (X) (x) (x) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? () (X) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-e) The site is on an alluvial fan, an environment not generally associated with fossils. An archeological survey performed for the Victoria Community Plan showed very little likelihood that any archeological sites are in the area. As the site is relatively small and vacant, and has been previously disturbed, the likelihood of affecting historical or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered significant. 15. Issues and Supporting Informatio~ Sources; Potentially Significant hT~oact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a) Any proposed residential project will incrementally increase the need for park and recreation services through population growth. The developer of any residential Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 Page 13 project will pay the appropriate fees in accordance with Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council. b) There is no impact to existing recreational opportunities as the site and property surrounding the project area is designated for residential development. 16. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact NO a) b) c) d) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) (X) (X) (X) Cornmerits: a) The project site does not contain Natural Resources as identified on Figure V-3 of the General Plan. Additionally, the site does not contain any Coastal Sage Scrub, Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, or Delhi-Sands flowering-loving fly habitat. No sensitive species were detected on-site and it is unlikely any will move onto the site due to the lack of natural habitat. Initial Study for GPA 00-01A, DDA 00-01, DA 00-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 b) During construction of any future development, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be emitted from grading the site. Nonetheless, dust emissions could be sufficient to warrant the use of water or other dust palliatives at this site. Sources of emissions during this phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces. NOxand PM~01evels maybe exceeded during this phase. Possible mitigation measures will be investigated during the environmental review of the Development Review process. c) The developer of any residential project will be required to pay development impact fees established by the City Council, the rates of which have been set to mitigate the potential impacts to fire protection service, police protection services, parks and recreational facilities, and other governmental services to less than significant. To the extent that a project may impact utility resources provided by private utility companies, potential impacts upon such services will be mitigated by payment of rates and fees set by each utility agency. The project wili also pay transportation impact fees to mitigate incremental impacts to the traffic system. d) Any proposed multiple family project on the 3.24 acres would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Therefore impacts are less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (X) General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (X) Environmental Closure Repor~ Former Alta Loma Packing House, 7125 Amethyst Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California, October 5, 1999 correspondence which the City has. He noted that the materials and files have been open to public review since the application was submitted. Commissioner Mannerino noted that the specified use will require a conditional use permit. Chairman McNiel stated the use would be conditioned, not automatically permitted and the City would still have those oversight options as well as denial available if the Industrial Area Specific Plan is amended. He said he understood the need for automobile service stations, but the Haven Avenue Overlay District was established because the City did not want a lot of retail except for retail which is ancillary to office uses along Haven Avenue. He noted that service stations were not permitted other than the Haven Car Wash, which is very well hidden. He acknowledged that times change and said he understood why the Commission was considering this application. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he had been on the Commission when the Haven Avenue Oveday District was approved and at that time the City did not want service stations there. However, he felt the City has established a track record of obtaining attractive stations and he felt the City wold have control on this because the station must be part of a master planned development. Commissioner Stewart concurred that the City would have a lot of control. She noted that the letters placed before them were not an overwhelming call for denial but rather included one in favor, one asking that proper conditions be included, and one from the applicant in response to another letter. Commissioner Tolstoy commented that service stations are ancillary uses to office uses. Commissioner Mannedno believed it has been proven that service stations can be attractive and he felt they are useful. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Mannerino, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-05. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: MACIAS - carried Chairman McNiel said he hoped he is on the Design Review Committee when the project comes through because it should be the best service station that has ever been built. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to add a Mixed Use zoning district with accompanying definitions, processing provisions, and development standards to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Related files: General Plan Amendment 00-01A, Development District Amendment 00-01, and Development Agreement 00-01. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Loreira Drive. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, Development Distdct Amendment 00-01, and Development Agreement 00-01. Planning Commission Minutes -7- May 24, 2000 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the Development District zoning designation from Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use, and the establishment of a Senior Housing Oveday Distdct (SHOD), including deviation from certain development standards for the residential portion of the base district, for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Ddve. The City will also consider Med ium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as alternatives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and Development Agreement 00-01. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-01 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Northtown Housing Development Corp. for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Overlay District (Section 27.020,040 of the Development Code) including deviation from certain development standards for 80 senior apartment units and one manager unit on a Mixed Use site of 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01 A, and Development District Amendment 00-01. Alan Warren, Associate .Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public headrig. Peter Pitassi, AIA, 8439 White Oak Avenue, #105, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he was representing the applicant and they wished to continuing the matter to the next meeting because they were still working on the Development Agreement. He indicated staff had requested, and the applicant had agreed to, a Mixed Use designation. He reported that Northtown intends to develop the property with a senior apartment project and does not intend to integrate retail or office uses into the project. He observed there will be a design review application for the senior housing project. He said construction will depend upon certain tax credits which they will apply for. Chairman McNiel said he would be in favor of mixed use tied to this owner but he did not think that was legal. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, confirmed that it is not legal to tie a use to a specific property owner. Mr. Pitassi stated the City Council was in favor of the Development District Amendment and they were moving toward agreement regarding the Development Agreement. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mannedno stated that the packing house is an interesting building and it was unfortunate that it cannot be used. He thought it appropriate to continue the projects until the next meeting so the Commission could see the Development Agreement at the same time. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the project is greatly needed in the community and this would be a good place for it. Commissioner Stewart agreed. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -8- City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment 00-01A, Development District Amendment 00-01, and Development Agreement 00-01 Public Review Period Closes: June 14, 2000 Project Name: Project Applicant: Northtown Housing Dev. Corp. Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of Lomita Drive and accompanying Development Agreement - APN: 202-151-12. Project Description: A request to change the General Plan and Development District land use designations from Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Commercial to Mixed Use with allowances for 0400 percent Medium-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) 0-100 percent Office land use development with a Development Agreement and a Senior Housing Overlay District for 3.24 acres of land. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at f 0500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. June 21. 2000 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. 00-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP PROVISIONS FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)AND COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE WITH LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FOR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)AND OFFICE USES FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-151-12. A. Recitals. 1, Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 00-01A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, 2000, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 24, 2000, and June 14, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 3.24 acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive, which is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated elementary school and is developed with the AIta Loma Elementary School. The properties to the west are designated Commercial and are developed with small retail shops. The properties to the east and south are designated railroad and Medium-High Residential and are vacant and developed with an apartment complexe; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-57 GPA 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14, 2000 Page 2 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street, its size exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use designation, and the evidence of similar uses existing in the immediate area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the existing multiple-family and small commercial activities in the immediate area; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, which contains provisions for Mixed Use land use designations. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-57 GPA 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14, 2000 Page 3 staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 00-01A to establish a Mixed Use designation for the site identified in this Resolution and shown in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, and to add the following text to the General Plan Land Use Element, page 111-18, as a second paragraph to the Mixed Use land use description: "The City has identified the following areas for special mixed use consideration: Historic Alta Loma-AmethVst site- This is a relatively small (3.24 acres), but significant, site within the historic Alta Loma commercial area. Once the location of a large citrus packinghouse, the site, now vacant, is strategically located on the east side of Amethyst Street between the neighborhood elementary school and original commercial center. This vacant parcel presents an opportunity to bring new activity into the historic town center either with new commercial office ventures, or with new multiple-family developments, possibly aimed to provide housing for our growing senior citizen population. The following table specifies the uses and range of developmentthat is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area: Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Ran.qe Ranqe Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres The land use categories proposed within the mixed use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the corresponding sections of the Land Use Element." 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: o756 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-57 GPA 00-01A- NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV, CORP. June 14, 2000 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of June 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERIN0, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ITI × = GPA 00-01A- General Plan Land Use Map ca (~nde',~t ................................ ..... i~r-.---. ....... Lomita Dr .............. ," ,' · ...., ,",,'-' Baseline Rd. ~ RDA site GP Land Use Designations ~ COMMERCIAL ~ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ~ HIGH ~ LOW ~ MEDIUM ~ MEDIUM HIGH ~ MIXED USE ~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ~ OFFICE no scale RESOLUTION NO. 00-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ENACT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE WITH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 202-151-12. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for Development District Amendment 00-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, 2000, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution 00- -~'7, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment No. 00-01A be approved. 3. On May 24, 2000, and June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing on May 24, 2000, and June 14, 2000, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 3.24 acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive, which is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as General Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24dwelling units per acre); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with the Alta Loma Elementary School. The properties to PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-58 DDA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14, 2000 Page 2 the west are designated General Commercial and are developed with small retail shops. The properties to the east and south are designated Medium-High Residential and are vacant and developed with apartment complexes; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street, its size exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use designation, and the evidence of conveniently located commercial facilities for a senior population in the immediate area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the existing multiple-family and small commercial activities in the immediate area; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan which contains provisions for Mixed Use land use designations. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the projectwill have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That based upon the changes and alterations which, have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. O0-5B DDA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14, 2000 Page 3 will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Distdct Amendment 00-01 to establish a Mixed Use District at the site described in this Resolution, and as described in the written text of and shown in Exhibit "A" of the attached draft City Council ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: I ChaT'm~an cN' , ' ATTEST: Bradl I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucemonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucemonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of June 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERIN0, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. . ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE WITH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 202-151- 12. A. Recitals. 1. The Nodhtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 00-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on an associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 00-5'?, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment No. 00-01A be approved. 3. On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the application by the adoption of Resolution No. 00-b"'~. 4. On June 21,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 00- , approving the associated General Plan Amendment No. 00-01A. 5. On June 21,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted as duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-referenced public hearing on June 21,2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to approximately 3.24 acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande City COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21,2000 Page 2 Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Ddve, which is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as General Commercial General and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); and b) The property to the nodh of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with the Alta Loma Elementary School. The properties to the west are designated General Commercial and are developed with small retail shops. The properties to the east and south are designated Medium-High Residential and are vacant and developed with apartment complexes; and c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street, its size exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use designation, and the evidence of conveniently located commercial facilities for a senior population in the immediate area; and b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the existing multiple family and small commercial activities in the immediate area; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan which contains provisions for Mixed Use land use designations. SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a) That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21, 2000 Page 3 b) That based upon the changes and alterations which, have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife. depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council dudng the public headrig, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 5: Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment No. 00-01 to establish a Mixed Use District at the site descdbed in this Ordinance, as shown in Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance, and described with the following text to be added to the Development Code as Section 17.08.030.F.1: "1. Historic AIta Loma- Amethyst Site: This 3.24 acre site is located on the east side of Amethyst Street, generally between the "/"' intersections extensions of Lomita Drive and La Grande Street, in the original Alta Loma downtown. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site: Pement Acreage Land Use Mix Ranqe Ranqe Medium-High Residential 0% - 100% (14-24 dwelling units per acre) 0 - 3.24 acres Office 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres The land use categories within the mixed use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in Development Code Chapters 17. 08 and 17. 10. All uses that may be authorized under the Office designation are subject to Conditional Use Permit approval The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17. 08 and 17. 1 O, for each permitted land use shall be applicable to development within the Mixed Use District." SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. RESOLUTION NO. 00-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION QF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ENTER INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-01, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 80-96 SENIORAPARTMENTS AND ONE MANAGER UNIT IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 202-151-12. A. Recitals. 1. Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for Development Agreement 00-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject Development Agreement is referred to as "the application." 2. On 24th day of May 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public headng on an associated General Plan Amendment application and recommended to the City Council the adoption of General Plan Amendment 00-01A. 3. On May 24, 2000, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public headng on an associated Development Distdct Amendment application and recommended to the City Council the adoption of Development Distdct Amendment 00-01. 4. On May 24, 2000, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 5. The subject property of the Development Agreement is legally described herein. 6. A true and correct copy of the proposed Development Agreement is attached as Exhibit "A" to the attached Draft Ordinance. 7. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the associated Environmental Assessment prepared for said project. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-59 DA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14, 2000 Page 2 2. This Commission hereby specificaily finds that the Development Agreement and each and every term and provision contained herein conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that them is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compiianco with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That based upon the changes and alterations, which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Fu~her, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. This Commission hereby recommends approval of the Development Agreement attached as Exhibit "A" of the attached draft Ordinance. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 00-59 DA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 14,2000 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of June 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-01, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD), INCLUDING DEVIATING FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 80 SENIOR APARTMENT UNITS AND ONE MANAGER UNIT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE - APN: 202-151-12. A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs of development." (ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Any city...may enter into a Development Agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article..." (iii) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows: "A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement..." CITYCOUNCIL DRAFT ORDINANCE NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION June 14, 2000 Page 2 (iv) "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference is proposed Development Agreement 00-01, concerning that property located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande Street, and as legally described in the attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the "Development Agreement." (v) On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed hearing concerning the Development Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date and recommended approval through adoption of its Resolution. (vi) On ,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement. (vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Initial Study, Parts I and II, and the Development Agreement, and certified the Negative Declaration, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-reference public hearings on May 24, and June 14, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The location, design, and proposes uses set forth in this Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity. b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement. SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement 00-01, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published with 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucemonga, California. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A, A REQUEST TO AMEND TFtE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AND MAP PROVISIONS FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)AND COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE WITH LAND USE DESIGNATIONf. J FOR MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)AND OFFICE USES FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-151-12. A. Recitals. 1. Nodhtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 00-01A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission concluded the public hearing and recommended approval of the application by the adoption of Resolution No. ~ '~/.. 4. On June 21,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 21,2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 3.24 acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Drive, which is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated elementary school and is developed with the Alta Loma Elementary School. The properties to the west are designated CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21,2000 Page 2 Commercial and are developed with small retail shops. The properties to the east and south are designated railroad and Medium-High Residential and are vacant and developed with an apartment complexes; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street, its size exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use designation, and the evidence of similar uses existing in the immediate area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the existing multiple family and small commercial activities in the immediate area; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan which contains provisions for Mixed Use land use designations. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 00-01A- NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21, 2000 Page 3 reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council dudng the public headng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 -d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 00-01A to establish a Mixed Use designation for the site identified in this Resolution and shown in Exhibit "A" of this Resolution, and to add the following text to the General Plan Land Use Element, page Ifi-18, as a second paragraph to the Mixed Use land use description: "The City has identified the following areas for special mixed use consideration: Historic Alta Loma-Amethvst site - This is a relatively small (3.24 acres), but significant, site within the historic AIta Loma commemial area. Once the location of a large citrus packinghouse, the site, now vacant, is strategically located on the east side of Amethyst Street between the neighborhood elementary school and original commercial center. This vacant pamel presents an opportunity to bring new activity into the historic town center either with new commemial office ventures, or with new multiple family developments, possibly aimed to provide housing for our growing senior citizen population. The loftowing table specifies the uses and range of de velopment that is anticipated to bring positive aspects to revitalize the area: Percent Acreage Land Use Mix Ran,qe Range Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Office 0% - 100% 0% - 100% 0 - 3.24 acres 0 - 3.24 acres The land use categories proposed within the mixed use area shall be of the character and intensity as defined in the corresponding sections of the Land Use Element." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2000. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FR × =' GPA 00-01A- General Plan Land Use Map ~ RDA site GP Land Use Designations ~ COMMERCIAL ~ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ~ HIGH ~ LOW ~ MEDIUM ~ MEDIUM HIGH ~ MIXED USE ~] NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ~ OFFICE no scale AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE FROM MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO MIXED USE WITH A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR 3.24 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 202-151- 12. A. Recitals. 1. The Northtown Housing Development Corporation has filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 00-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on an associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 00-jr;7, recommending to the City Council that General Plan Amendment No. 00-01 A be approved. 3. On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval of the application by the adoption of Resolution No. 00-5~'. 4. On June 21,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the associated General Plan Amendment application and issued Resolution No. 00- , approving the associated General Plan Amendment No. 00-01A. 5. On June 21,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted as duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headng on that date. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-referenced public hearing on June 21,2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to approximately 3.24 acres of land, basically a triangular configuration, located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande CItY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21,2000 Page 2 Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Ddve, which is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as General Commercial General and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre); and b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with the Alta Loma Elementary School. The properties to the west are designated General Commercial and are developed with small retail shops. The properties to the east and south are designated Medium-High Residential and are vacant and developed with apartment complexes; and c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by its frontage on a public street, its size exceeding minimum size requirements for the land use designation, and the evidence of conveniently located commercial facilities for a senior population in the immediate area; and b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the existing multiple family and small commercial activities in the immediate area; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformanco with the General Plan which contains provisions for Mixed Use land use designations. SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a) That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. CItY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEV. CORP. June 21,2000 Page 3 b) That based upon the changes and alterations which, have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1 ~d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 5: Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment No. 00-01 to establish a Mixed Use District at the site described in this Ordinance, as shown in Exhibit "A" of this Qrdinanco, and described with the following text to be added to the Development Code as Section 17.08.030.F.1: "1. Historic Alta Loma - Amethyst Site: This 3.24 acre site is located on the east side of Amethyst Street, generally between the "T" intersections extensions of Lomita Drive and La Grande Street, in the original Alta Loma downtown. The following table specifies the uses and range of development that may be permitted on the site: Pement Acreage Land Use Mix Ranqe Range Medium-High Residential 0% - 100% (14-24 dwelling units per acre) 0 - 3.24 acres Office 0% ~ 100% 0 - 3.24 acres The land use categories within the mixed use area shaft be of the character and intensity as defined in Development Code Chapters 17. 08 and 17. I O. All uses that may be authorized under the Office designation are subject to Conditional Use Permit approvaL The corresponding development standards, as listed in Chapters 17. 08 and 17. 1 O, for each permitted land use shaft be applicable to development within the Mixed Use District." SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. rT1 × = DDA 00-01 - Development District Map ii::~ Mediun~Hgh ::i:: La Grand~ St. ... ........... ~i~a b~: .....',, .......T ~ RDA .ire ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,* *%* ** ~, ,%%%* ** ** GP Land Use Designations ii i~iiiiiii~*~= ~ COMMERCIAL GENERAL ::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::: :::: ::::::::::::::::::::::~ ) HIGH ,'= =~*~! ~ MEDIUM :::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ M~xED USE ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: . .:."':~.'".'."i~ NE~GHBOR,OOD COMMERC~A. ......... i} ...............-.,~ oFF,cE,.Ro~Ess,o. AL ::i::i::i::iii::ii~iii °~"'~'""'°"" i::::iii::i' .i'=::== Baseline Rd. no scale N ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-01, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING A SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT (SHOD), INCLUDING DEVIATING FROM CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 80 SENIOR APARTMENT UNITS AND ONE MANAGER UNIT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF AMETHYST STREET, SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LA GRANDE STREET AND NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION WITH LOMITA DRIVE - APN: 202-151-12. A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs of development." (ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Any city...may enter into a Development Agreement with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article..." (iii) California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows: "A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density of intensify of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement..." CITYCOUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION June 14, 2000 Page 2 (iv) "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference is proposed Development Agreement 00-01, concerning that property located on the east side of Amethyst Street, south of the intersection with La Grande Street, and as legally described in the attached Development Agreement. Hereina~er in this Ordinance, the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the "Development Agreement." (v) On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed hearing concerning the Development Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date and recommended approval through adoption of its Resolution. (vi) On June 21, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement. (vii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Initial Study, Parts I and II, and the Development Agreement, and certified the Negative Declaration, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-reference public hearings on May 24, and June 14 and June 21, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The location, design, and proposes uses set forth in this Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity. b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement. SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement 00-01, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published with 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 00-01 SENIOR CITIZENS' HOUSING THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the "Effective Date" set forth herein by and between NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California NON PROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ("Developer") and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State Of California ("City"). WITNESSETH: Recitals. 1. California Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. Authorizes cities to enter into Binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. California Government Code Section 65915 provides that a City may, by agreement with a developer, grant a density bonus over that allowed by the maximum density established in the Development Code and Land Use Element of the General Plan when a developer agrees to construct housing for low income senior households. The Developer has requested City to consider the approval of a development agreement, with a density bonus, pertaining to that real property located entirely within City, the common and legal description of which is set forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The site is now zoned Mixed Use with a Senior Housing Overlay District pursuant to the provisions of City's Development Code, as amended to date hereof. Developer and City desire to provide through this Development Agreement more specific development controls on the site which, will provide for maximum efficient utilization of the site in accordance with sound planning principles. The Developer proposes to construct a senior housing residential project, including low- income units, within the City. Said project contemplated by Developer will require an increase in the maximum density as currently provided in the Mixed Use District with a Senior Housing Oveday District. It is the desire of City to encourage developments designed to provide affordable rental units for senior residents of the City. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby willing to grant a density bonus to Developer as provided by the terms of this Agreement. That any housing project developed pursuant to this agreement, and any subsequent land use approvals required by City ordinances, shall comply with all appropriate provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. On July 5, 2000, City adopted its Ordinance No. , thereby approving this Development Agreement with Developer and said action was effective on August 5, 2000. B. Aqreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following meaning: a. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga, "Project" is the development approved by City comprised of approximately eighty (80) to ninety-six (96) senior apartment units, one manager unit, recreational and common area facilities, parking spaces, and other amenities on the Site. "Qualified Project Period" means the first day on which the residential units in the development are first available for occupancy by Qualified Tenants and continuing for thirty years, except that the limitation that atl tenants, occupants and residents by Qualified Tenants shall continue in perpetuity. "Qualified Tenants" shall mean persons or households who are at least fifty-five years or older and are senior citizens as defined in Section 51.3 of the California Civil Code as amended from time to time. (i) "Very Low Income Qualified Tenants" shall mean Qualified Tenants who possess an income equal to or less than the amounts as specified in California Health and Safety Code Section 50105, as amended. (n) "Ninety Percent Income Qualified Tenants" means a household whose annual income does not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the Area Median Income. "Area Median Income" as may be used in determining income status or rent rate herein, shall mean that determined median for the County of San Bernardino, as set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 50093, as amended. "Affordable Rents" shall mean the total charges for rent, and utilities, to a Very Low Income Qualified Tenant shall not exceed one-twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of Very Low Income, adjusted for household size. The total charges for rent, and utilities to a Ninety Percent Income Qualified Tenant shall not exceed one-twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of ninety percent (90%) of the Area Median Income, adjusted for household size. Initial rents for each unit shall be set by the Developer at the time of initial occupancy of the Development. Rents may be adjusted annually by the same percentage that income has increased, if any, for a Very Low Income Qualified Tenant or a Ninety Percent Income Qualified Tenant, based on changes in the Area Median Income. At least sixty calendar days prior to increasing rents on any unit restricted by this Agreement, the Developer shall submit to the City the Developers calculation of such increase. Tenants occupying units restricted by this Agreement .shall be given at least thirty days written notice prior to any rent increase. "Effective Date" shall mean the 31 st calendar day following adoption of the ordinance approving this Agreement by City's City Council. Recitals. The recitals are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced and enforceable as any other provision of this Agreement. Interest of Property Owner. Developer warrants and represents that it has entered into an escrow or an agreement by which it is to acquire full legal title to the real property of the site and that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement. Bindinq Effect of Aqreement. The Developer hereby subjects the development and the land described in Exhibit 'W' hereto to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. The City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Developers successors and assigns in title or interest to the Development. Each and every contract. deed, Regulatory Agreements with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency or other instrument hereinaffer executed, covering or conveying the development or any portion thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. City and Developer hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that the Developer's legal interest in the development is rendered less valuable thereby. The City and Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the Development by Qualified Tenants, the intended beneficiaries of such covenants, reservations and restrictions, and by furthering the public purposes for which this Agreement is adopted. Furlher, the parties hereto agree that such covenants, reservations and restrictions benefit all other real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Relationship of Parties. It is understood that the contractual relationship between City and Developer is such that Developer is an independent party and is not the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever and shall not be considered to be the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever. RequlatorV AGreement: In addition to the requirements of this Agreement, the Developer shall comply with all the terms and conditions of the Regulatory Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency. Term of Aqreement. The term of the Agreement shall commence on the effective date and shall expire thirty years after the commencement of the Qualified Project Period, so long as Developer remains in material compliance with this Agreement, as from time to time amended. This Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated automatically if Developer does not obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the entirety of the Project within five (5) years of the effective date. Restrictions on Rental Units. During the term of this Agreement, all tenants, occupants and residents shall be Qualified Tenants except for one resident manager. However, it is expressly understood by the parties hereto that the Project has been specifically designed to meet the unique needs of senior tenants. Accordingly, even after the expiration of the to meet the unique needs of senior tenants. Accordingly, even after the expiration of the term, the limitation that all tenants, occupants and residents of apartment units in the Project shall be Qualified Tenants shall remain in perpetuity, unless the Project is made to conform with all then applicable Development Code provisions pertaining to multi-family dwellings. Said apartment units shall not be rented, occupied, leased or subleased to occupants who are not Qualified Tenants except as provided as follows: A person or persons who is not a Qualified Tenant, but is a "Qualified Permanent Resident as defined in Civil Code Section 51.3; A person or persons under fifty-five years of age may occupy apartment units as temporary tenants for a period of time not to exceed three months during any calendar year. Rental Requirements. During the Qualified Project Period at least forty percent (40%) of the units in the Project, shall be rented, leased or held available for Very Low Income Qualified Tenants at affordable rents. All remaining units shall be rented, leased or held available for Ninety Percent Income Qualified Tenants at affordable rents. 10. Maintenance of Apartments as Rentals. During the term hereof, all apartment units in the Project shall remain rental units. No apartment unit in the Project shall be eligible for conversion from rental units to condominiums, townhomes or any other common interest subdivision without consent of the City Council. 11. On-site Manaqer. A full-time resident manager shall be provided on the Project site. 12. Tenant Committee. Residents shall have the right to establish a committee composed of tenants for the purpose of organizing social activities and providing comments and suggestions to the Developer regarding the operation and facilities of the Project. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to restrict the rights of individuals to organize activities and provide comments to the Developer. 13. Submission of Materials and Annual Review. Prior to occupancy, the Developer shall submit to City tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods which Developer shall use to advertise the availability of apartments in the Project and screening mechanisms which Developer intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartments to Qualified Tenants and Low Income Qualified Tenants. On or before March 15 of each year following the commencement of the Qualified Project Period, the Developer, or its representative, shall file a certificate of continuing program compliance with the City. Each such repod shall contain such information as City may require including, but not limited to, the following: a. Rent schedules then in effect. including utility charges (if any); b. A project occupancy profile; c. A description of the physical condition and maintenance procedures for the Project, including apadment units, landscaping, walkways, and recreational areas. The report may be combined with, or form a part of, the Annual Report required by the Redevelopment Agency's Regulatory Agreement as long as it contains the above listed items. 14. City shall be allowed to conduct physical inspections of the Project as it shall deem necessary, provided that said inspections do not unreasonably interfere with the normal operations of the Project and reasonable notice is provided. The City shall further be allowed to conduct an annual survey of residents in the Project in order to assess senior needs. Tenant Selection, Contracts and Rules and ReGulations. On receipt of an application for low- income occupancy, Developer shall determine the eligibility of the occupancy under the terms of this Development Agreement. Verification of tenant eligibility shall include one or more of the following factors: Obtain an income verification form from the Social Security Administration and/or the California Depadment of Social Services, if the applicant receives income from either or both agencies; b. Obtain an income tax return for the most recent tax year; c. Conduct a TRW or similar financial search; Obtain an income verification from all current employers; and If the applicant is unemployed and has no tax return, obtain another form of independent verification. Developer shall be entitled to rely on the information contained in the application sworn to by the applicant. All agreements for rental of all apartment units in the Project shall be in writing. The form of proposed rent or lease agreement shall be reviewed and approved by City prior to the commencement of the Qualified Project Period. Such agreement shall include all rules and regulations governing tenancy within the Project. The rules and regulations shall include regulations which specifically authorize the keeping of small pets within all apartment units. 15. Termination and Eviction of Tenants. A tenancy may be terminated without the termination being deemed an eviction under the following circumstances; a. The death of the sole tenant of the unit; By the tenant at the expiration of the term of occupancy or other wise upon thirty days' written notice; c. By abandonment of the premises by the tenant; or d. By failure of a tenant to execute or renew a lease. Any termination of a tenancy other than those listed above in this paragraph 14 shall constitute an eviction. Developer shall only evict in compliance with the provision of California law and then only for material noncompliance with the terms of the rental agreement. 16. Local Residenc¥. Residency preference shall be given where possible and to the extent permitted by law to applicants to the Project who have been residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. However, that factor shall not be given priority over the other elements of Qualified Tenant selection as stated herein. 17. Hazard Insurance. Developer shall keep the Project and all improvements thereon insured at all times against loss or damage endorsement and such other risks, perils or coverage as Developer may determine. During the term hereof, the Project shall be insured as provided in the Disposition and Development Agreement of the City's Redevelopment Agency. 18. Maintenance Guarantee. Developer shall comply with all City maintenance standards enacted from time to time. 19. Standards and Restriction Pertaininq to Development of the Real Prol3ertV. The following specific restrictions shall apply to the use of the Site pursuant to this Development Agreement: Only residential uses of the real property, including provisions of services needed or desired by the residents, shall be permitted in the Project; and The final Site Plan and development design shall be subject to a City approved development review procedure, to be applied for by the owner; and The maximum density of residential dwelling units in the Project shall never be greater than 30 dwelling units per acre; and The maximum height for the highest proposed building in the Project shall be forty- two (42) feet; and The maximum size for all the buildings and the proposed square footage for each of the apartment types located in the Project shall be as set forth in a City approved development review application; and The provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes shall be established through the development review process. The maximum number of required parking off-street parking spaces shall be subject to the Development Review process, but shall be no less than .7 parking space per unit and no less that 1 space for the manager's unit, and The minimum private open space requirement for ground floor units shall be subject to the Development Review process, and The minimum private open space requirement for upper floor units shall be subject to the Development Review process; and The minimum number of washeddryer facilities shall be modified from the Development Code and subject to the Development Review process, but not less than one washer/dryer for every 14 units; and k. The minimum building setback from the drive aisle shall be reduced to an amount not less than 9 feet; and Recreational amenities may be duplicated in order to fulfill the total number of recreational amenities required for the project; and m. A perimeter wall, if any, shall be subject to the Development Review process. 20. Project Desiqn Amenities for Senior Citizens. The Project open space, buildings and individual apartments shall be designed with physical amenities catering to the needs and desires of the senior citizen residents. In addition to those conditions set forth in the development review process, following physical amenities shall be substantially included in the Project, but may be modified by the City during the Development Review process: a. Elevator service shall be provided to all upper story apartments; Units shall be designed to comply with the State requirements for disabled access for multiple family housing; c. Handrails shall be provided in all hallways; d. Building space shall be devoted for tenant group meetings; and Recreational amenities shall be oriented towards senior needs and may include, but not limited to, lawn bowling, gazebos, and barbecue areas and be subject to the Development Review process. 21. Indemnification. Developer agrees to indemnify, defend and hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Developer or those of its contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on its behalf which relate to the Project. Developer agrees to indemnify and shall defend City and it s elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer's activities in connection with the Project with a counsel reasonably satisfactory to the City. This indemnification provision applies to all damages and claims the operations referred to in this Development Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this provision shall not apply to any such claims which arise out of, or by reason of, the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its elected officials, agents and employees. 22. Non-Liability of Aqencv Officials, Employees, and AQents. No member, official, employee, or agent of the City shall be personally liable to the Developer or any permitted successor-in- interest of the Developer in the event of default or breach by the City or the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency under this agreement or for any amount which may become due to the Developer, its successors or under any obligation under the terms of this Agreement. 23. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in California Government Code Section 65868 et seq. 24. Federal, State Preemption: As provided in State Govemment Code Section 65869.5, where state or federal laws or regulations enacted after this Development Agreement has been entered into prevent or preclude compliance with the provisions of the Development Agreement, such provisions shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or federal laws or regulations. 25. Administrative Modifications: Minor conflicts resulting from the strict interpretation of this Agreement with the application of the City's development regulations may be modified administratively by the City Planner. 26. Enforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer (or its successor) at the address of the Project, and by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, and if such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty days after such notice is given, or if not cerrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within thirty days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within said thirty days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by Developer), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, City may bdng any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Developer of any provision of this Agreement or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. 27. After completion of the Project pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, any default may ' alternatively be enforced as any normal violation of the standards and provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Accordingly, the following penalty is specifically included as pad of this Agreement: "It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, padnership, or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Agreement. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of this Agreement by failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars or by imprisonment not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each such person, firm, partnership or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Agreement is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, and shall be punishable therefore as herein." Event of Default. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more of the following events or conditions: If a material warranty, representation or statement is made or furnished by Developer to City and is false or proved to have been knowingly false in any material respect when it was made; 28. If a finding and determination is made by City following an annual review pursuant to paragraph 13 herein above, upon the basis of substantial evidence that Developer has not complied in good faith with any material terms and conditions of this Agreement, after notice and oppodunity to cure as described in paragraph 34 herein above; or A breach by Developer of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in paragraph 34 herein above. No Waiver of Remedies. City does not waive any claim of defect in performance by Developer if on periodic review City does not enforce or terminate this Agreement. Nonperformance by Developer shall not be excused because performance by Developer of the obligations herein contained would be unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party or entity, other than City. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing development agreements are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Development Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 29. Riqhts of Lenders Under this Aqreement. Should Developer place or cause to be placed any encumbrance or lien on the project, or any part thereof, the beneficiary ("Lender") of said encumbrance or lien, including, but not limited to, mortgages, shall have the right at any time during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to: Do any act or thing required of Developer under this Agreement, and any such act or thing done or performed by Lender shall be as effective as if done by Developer itself; b= Realize on the security afforded by the encumbrance or lien by exercising foreclosure proceedings or power of sale or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the security document evidencing the encumbrance or lien (hereinafter referred to as "the trust deed"); Transfer, convey or assign the title of Developer to the Project to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed; and Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale be conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust deed. The City agrees that the terms of this Agreement are subordinate to any such financing instrument and shall execute from time to time any and all documentation reasonably requested by Developer or Lender to effect such subordination. 30. Notice to Lender. City shall give written notice of any default or breach under this Agreement by Developer to Lender and afford Lender the opportunity after service of the notice to: Cure the breach or default within sixty days after service of said notice, where the default can be cured by the payment of money; Cure the breach or default within sixty days after service of said notice, where the breach or default can be cured by something other than the payment of money and can be cured within that time; or Cure the breach or default in such reasonable time as may be required where something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and cannot be performed within sixty days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default are commenced within a sixty day period after service of said notice of default on Lender by City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender. 31. Action by Lender. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a Lender may forestall any action by City for a breach or default under the terms of this Agreement by Developer by commencing proceedings to foreclose its encumbrance or lien on the Project. The proceedings so commenced may be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order of court or for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power of sale contained in the instrument creating the encumbrance or lien. The proceedings shall not, however, forestall any such action by the City for the default or breach by Developer unless: They are commenced within sixty days after service on Lender of the notice described herein above; They are, after having been commenced, diligently pursued in the manner required by law to completion; and Lender keeps and performs all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement requiring the payment or expenditure of money by Developer until the foreclosure proceedings are complete or are discharged by redemption, satisfaction or payment. 32. Rent Control. In consideration for the limitations herein provided, City agrees that it shall not, during the term of this Agreement, take any action, the effect of which will be to control, determine or affect the rents for those low income rental units located in the Project, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. 33. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other such address as may be later specified by the par~ies hereto. Developer: Nacho Gracia, Executive Director Northtown Housing Development Corporation 9999 Feron Boulevard #A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 34. Attorney's Fees. In any proceedings arising from the enforcement of this Development Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall' be entitled to recover its costs and its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during the proceeding as may be fixed within the discretion of the court. 35. Bindine Effect. This agreement shall bind, and the benefits and burdens hereof shall inure to, the respective parties hereto and their legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, wherever the context requires or admits. 36. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and govemed by the laws of the State of California. 37. Partial Invaliditv. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 38. Recordation. This Agreement shall, at the expense of Developer, be recorded in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardinc. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the effective date set fodh herein above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: By William J. Alexander, Mayer NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. Dated: By Nacho Gracia, Executive Director THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA Sg3 ffReport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA - A proposal to add a Mixed Use zoning distdct with accompanying definitions, processing provisions, and development standards to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 00-01, enacting standards and procedures for the establishment of a Mixed Use Distdct within the Development Code by adoption of the attached ordinance. BACKGROUND: At its May 24, 2000 meeting, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission considered this Development Code Amendment in conjunction with associated General Plan Amendment 00-01A, Development DiStrict Amendment 00-01 and Development Agreement 00-01. This code amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission in response to the above listed land use amendment applications for a Mixed Use designation at the Redevelopment Agency~s property on Amethyst Avenue. The adoption of this amendment will provide procedures for the development of a senior housing project within a Mixed Use distdct at the Amethyst Street site. The Planning Commission concluded its public hearing on June 14, 2000, and adopted the above listed recommendation. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission Report of May 24, 2000 regarding analysis of the proposed amendment. City Planner BB:AW\Is Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Reports dated May24 and June 14, 2000 Ordinance Approving Development Code Amendment 00-01 T H E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: June 14, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDEMENT 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to add a Mixed Use zoning district with accompanying definitions, processing provisions, and development standards to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the May 24, 2000, meeting along with associated General Plan Amendment 00-01A and Development DistriCt Amendment 00-01 applications. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission report of May 24, 2000, for discussion of the proposed code amendments. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for Development Code Amendment 00-01 by the adoption of the Resolution and accompanying draft Ordinance attached to Planning Commission report of May 24, 2000. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AV~Ama Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report, May 24, 2000 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Draft Minutes dated May 24, 2000 Exhibit "C" - Draft Ordinance for Development Code Amendment 00-01 Resolution Approving Development Code Amendment 00-01 THE CiTY OF Staff Report DATE: May 24, 2000 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDEMENT 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A proposal to add a Mixed Use zoning district with accompanying definitions, processing provisions, and development standards to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This proposal to add a Mixed Use district to the Development Code is a direct result of the current request to change the land use designations on the old packinghouse site at Amethyst Avenue (General Plan Amendment 00-01A and Development Code Amendment 00-01 ). In order to provide sections in the Development Code for the requested Mixed Use district, it was necessary for City staff to request authorization to proceed with a Development Code Amendment. On April 12, 2000, the Planning Commission authorized City staff to initiate a Development Code Amendment for this purpose. The City's General Plan has a Mixed Use category which has zoning implementation for a few sites throughout the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The Amethyst Avenue site's zoning regulation is through the Development Code, which does not have a Mixed Use category. Of additional interest, the General Plan Update consultants have recommended the expanded use of Mixed Use districts at selective areas of importance in the overall General Plan land use patterns. In this Development Code Amendment, staff has incorporated some of the proposed outline form of the consultant's General Plan Update drafts. ANALYSIS: Generah The specific wording of the proposed amendment is contained in the accompanying Exhibit CA") and Resolution of Approval. Briefly, the amendment provides the following text additions: Establishes Planning Commission review for all Mixed Use projects (Section 17.06.010.C.1 .h). Staff believes that all Mixed Use districts must be under Planning Commission review in order to ensure the appropriate application of the varying development standards of each use and activity. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 24, 2000 Page 2 Definition of the Mixed Use land use activity (Section 17.08.020.G). This provision sets the intent of the Mixed Use category. Provides a section for each Mixed Use district's description (Section 17.08.030.F). Because each Mixed Use property will be tailored to have a different mix of uses, each area that is so designated must have a detailed description of the permitted percentages of each use. The individual site description shall be adopted with each individual Development District Amendment. Establishes a basis for Mixed Use district development standards (Section 17,08.040.A.3). This section provides the basis for applying the varying development standards existing within the Development Code for each use and activity. B. Environmental: The Development District Amendment is exempt from environmental assessment by Section 15061 (b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper with a 1/8 page legal advertisement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for Development Code Amendment 00-01 by the adoption of the attached Resolution and accompanying Exhibit. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Development Code Mixed Use Standards Resolution of Approval DEVELOPMENT CODE MIXED USE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01: All recommended text additions are shown in bold print. The existing text is included with regular print to show the context in which the new provisions are to be placed. The following, shown in bold print, shall be added as Section 17.06.010.C.1 .h to the Land Development section of the Development Code: C. Authority Planninq Commission Review. Development/Design Review applications which meet any of the following criteria shall require review and consideration by the Planning Commission: Any project being proposed along a Special Boulevard as defined by the General Plan, except for structures within projects with an approved master plan as provided for in subsection b below. be All projects which are master planned. Once the master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the Planning Commission, individual structures may be approved by the City Planner. c. All residential subdivisions. All shopping centers, except individual structures may be approved by the City Planner where a master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the Planning Commission. Any project requiring an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). f. All projects of more than ten acres of land. Certain projects within a hillside area are subject to review pursuant to Section 17.24.020-B. h. All projects within Mixed Used Districts. The following, shown in bold print, shall be added as Section 17.08.020.G to the Residential section of the Development Code: These districts have been created to implement the goals, objectives and land use designations of the General Plan. In addition, each district is designed to implement the density limits of each district. Very Low Residential District (VL). This district is intended as an area for very low density single family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to 2 units per gross acre. B. Low Residential District (L). This district is intended as an area for single family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. ,'b + " DEVELOPMENT CODE MIXED USE STANDARDS -2- Low-Medium Residential District (LM). This district is intended as an area for low- medium density single family or multiple family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby single family detached neighborhoods. Residential densities are expected to range from 4 to 8 units per gross acre maximum. Medium Residential District (M). This district is intended as an area for medium density multiple family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities are expected to range from 8-14 units per gross acre maximum. Medium-Hiqh District (MH). This district is intended as an area for medium-high density multiple family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities are expected to range from 14 to 24 units per gross acre maximum. Hiqh Residential District (H). This district is intended as an area for high density multiple family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities are expected to range from 24 to 30 units per gross acre. Mixed Use (MU). This district is intended as an area for a mix of residential and non-residential uses, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. Each location of this district is identified in Section 17.08.030F with percent ranges for each permitted use that is identified. Each use that is so identified is identical to the use definition listed elsewhere in the Development Code. The following, shown in bold print, shall be added as Section 17.08.030.F to the residential section of the Development Code: Mixed Use Districts. These districts have been created to implement the goals, objectives, and land use designations of the General Plan. Each location where a Mixed Use District is established will have the specific land uses that may be authorized for development listed in this section. The following, shown in bold print, shall be added as Section 17.08.040.A.3 to the residential section of the Development Code: Development Standards. The development standards for residential development are arranged into two categories: (1) basic development standards, and (2) optional development standards. These standards are used in conjunction with the Absolute Policies and Design Guidelines during the residential land development/design review process as discussed in Chapter 17.06. Each residential development must conform to either the basic standards or the optional standards. DEVELOPMENT CODE MIXED USE STANDARDS -3- Basic Development Standards. These standards are intended to provide basic standards which will ensure good quality and compatible projects. A residential development over four units per acre is generally limited to the mid-point of the density range for which it is designated. These standards, as well as the density limitation, are intended to create a development which will be compatible and provide for proper transitions from more sensitive or less intense residential development. Optional Development Standards. These standards are intended to provide high standards for the development of projects of superior quality and compatibility. The optional standards allow development at the higher end of the designated density range. However, the standards and development expectations have been increased above and beyond the basic standards in order to ensure proper transitions and buffers from lower intense residential Uses. The ultimate density allowed in any residential district shall be determined through the residential land development design review process and public hearings as described in Chapter 17.06. The Planning Commission shall have the authority to reasonably condition any residential development to ensure proper transition and compatibility to adjacent residential developments; existing or proposed. Mixed Use Development Standards. For the purposes of establishing guidance for the application of individual land use regulations and development standards, all Mixed Use District development proposals are subject to master planning procedures as outlined in Section 17.20.030. Existing development standards for each land use category, as provided in Sections 17.08 through 17.24, shall be the basis of standards for each category within a mixed use development plan, but they may be modified by the City during the Master Plan review process. Development agreements between the property owners and the City may be used as implementation measures for any amended standards or review procedures. correspondence which the City has. He noted that the materials and files have been open to public review since the application was submitted. Commissioner Mannedno noted that the specified use will require a conditional use permit. Chairman McNiel stated the use would be cenditioned, not automatically permitted and the City would still have those overeight options as well as denial available if the Industrial Area Specific Plan is amended. He said he understood the need for automobile service stations, but the Haven Avenue Overlay District was established because the City did not want a lot of retail except for retail which is ancillary to office uses along Haven Avenue. He noted that service stations were not permitted other than the Haven Car Wash, which is very well hidden. He acknowledged that times change and said he understood why the Commission was censidedn9 this application. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he had been on the Commission when the Haven Avenue Overlay Distdct was approved and at that time the City did not want service stations there. However, he felt the City has established a track record of obtaining attractive stations and he felt the City wold have control on this because the station must be pad of a master planned development. Commissioner Stewart concurred that the City would have a lot of central. She noted that the letters placed before them were not an overwhelming call for denial but rather included one in favor, one asking that proper conditions be included, and one from the applicant in response to another letter. Commissioner Tolstoy commented that service stations are ancillary uses to office uses. Commissioner Mannerino believed it has been proven that service stations can be attractive and he felt they are useful. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Mannedno, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-05. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: MACIAS - carried Chairman McNiel said he hoped he is on the Design Review Committee when the project comes through because it should be the best service station that has ever been built. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A proposal to add a Mixed Use zoning district with accompanying definitions, processing provisions, and development standards to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Related files: General Plan Amendment 00-01A, Development District Amendment 00-01, and Development Agreement 00-01. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 00-01A - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the General Plan land use designation from Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Ddve. The City · .. 00-0 , D ve,o.me.t District Amendment 00-01 .. Deve,opme.t Agreeme.t ,,...,.,oo..,..,o.,...,.. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 00-01 - NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to change the Development District zoning designation from Commercial and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed Use, and the establishment of a Senior Housing Oveday Distdct (SHOD), including deviation from certain development standards for the residential portion of the base district, for 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Ddve. The City will also consider Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Office as altematives for the entire site - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00~01A, and Development Agreement 00-01. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-01 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Northtown Housing Development Corp. for the purpose of providing a Senior Housing Project per the requirements of the Senior Housing Oveday District (Section 27.020.040 of the Development Code) including deviation from certain development standards for 80 senior apartment units and one manager unit on a Mixed Use site of 3.24 acres of land located on the east side of Amethyst Avenue, south of the intersection with La Grande Street and north of the intersection with Lomita Ddve - APN: 202-151-12. Related files: Development Code Amendment 00-01, General Plan Amendment 00-01A, and Development District Amendment 00-01. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public headng. Peter Pitassi, AIA, 8439 White Oak Avenue, #105, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he was representing the applicant and they wished to continuing the matter to the next meeting because they were still working on the Development Agreement. He indicated staff had requested, and the applicant had agreed to, a Mixed Use designation. He reported that Northtown intends to develop the property with a senior apartment project and does not intend to integrate retail or office uses into the project. He observed there will be a design review application for the senior housing project. He said construction will depend upon certain tax credits which they will apply for. Chairman McNiel said he would be in favor of mixed use tied to this owner but he did not think that was legal. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attomey, confirmed that it is not legal to tie a use to a specific property owRer. Mr. Pitassi stated the City Council was in favor of the Development Distdct Amendment and they were moving toward agreement regarding the Development Agreement. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Mannerino stated that the packing house is an interesting building and it was unfortunate that it cannot be used. He thought it appropriate to continue the projects until the next meeting so the Commission could see the Development Agreement at the same time. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the project is greatly needed in the community and this would be a good place for it. Commissioner Stewart agreed. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -8- May 2000 ? 7 DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01, TO ESTABLISH MIXED USE DISTRICTS, WITH ACCOMPANYING DEFINITIONS, PROCESSING PROVISIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.010.C.1, 17.08.020, 17.08.030 AND 17.08.040.A QF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On May 24, 2000, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above- referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. , recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On ,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The following sections hereby are amended to read, in words and figures, as written below: 1. The following shall be added as Section 17.06.010.C.l.h to the Land Development section of the Development Code: "h. All projects within Mixed Used Districts." 2. The following shall be added as Section 17.08.020.G to the Residential section of the Development Code: "G. Mixed Use (MU). This district is intended as an area for a mix of residential and non-residential uses, with site development regulations that assure development compatible · ith nearby lower density residential development, as well as internal compatibility among the CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 00-01- CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 14, 2000 Page 2 varying uses. Each location of this district is identified in Section 17.08.030F with percent ranges for each permitted use that is identified. Each use that is so identified is identical to the use definition listed elsewhere in the Development Code." 3. The following shall be added as Section 17.08.030.F to the residential section of the Development Code: "F. Mixed Use Districts - These districts have been created to implement the goals, objectives, and land use designations of the General Plan. Each location where a Mixed Use District is established will have the specific land uses that may be authorized for development listed in this section." 4. The following shall be added as Section 17.08.040.A.3 to the residential section of the Development Code: "3. Mixed Use Development Standards. For the purposes of establishing guidance for the application of individual land use regulations and development standards, all Mixed Use District development proposals are subject to master planning procedures as outlined in Section 17.20.030. Existing development standards for each land use category, as provided in Sections 17.08 through 17.24, shall be the basis of standards for each category within a mixed use development plan, but they may be modified by the City during the Master Plan review process. Development agreements between the property owners and the City may be used as implementation measures for any amended standards or review procedures." SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. 00-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01, TO ESTABLISH A MIXED USE DISTRICT, WITH ACCOMPANYING DEFINITIONS, PROCESSING PROVISIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.010.C. 1, 17.08.020, 17.08.030 AND 17.08.040.A OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Code Amendment 00-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 24, 2000, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 24, 2000, and June 14, 2000, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development by permitting joint development of varying uses already listed in the General Plan; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by allowing the innovative use of existing development standards to expand the range of uses within a development project; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 00-56 DCA 00-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 14, 2000 Page 2 c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity by mandating the continued use of existing development procedures and standards for Mixed Use districts; and d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and is consistent with the objectives the Development Code by continuing a policy of encouraging quality development through the innovative application of existing design standards. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b) (3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 00-01 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JUNE 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: .~ McNiel, C~airman ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certi~ that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of June 2000, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ORDINANCE NO. ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 00-01, TO ESTABLISH MIXED USE DISTRICTS, WITH ACCOMPANYING DEFINITIONS, PROCESSING PROVISIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.010.C.1, 17.08.020, 17.08.030 AND 17.08.040.A OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On May 24, and continued to June 14, 2000, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above- referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 00-56, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On June 21,2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The following sections hereby are amended to read, in words and figures, as written below: 1., The following shall be added as Section 17.06.010.C.l.h to the Land Development section of the Development Code: "h. All projects within Mixed Used Districts. ' 2. The following shall be added as Section 17.08.020.G to the Residential section of the Development Code: ~G. Mixed Use (MU). This district is intended as an area for a mix of residential and non-residential uses, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential CiTY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 00-01- CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 14, 2000 Page 2 development, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. Each location of this district is identified in Section 17. 08. 030F with percent ranges for each permitted use that is identified. Each use that is so identified is identical to the use definition listed elsewhere in the Development Code.' 3. The following shall be added as Section 17.08.030.F to the residential section of the Development Code: "F. Mixed Use Districts - These districts have been created to implement the goals, objectives, and land use designations of the General Plan. Each location where a Mixed Use District is established will have the specific land uses that may be authorized for development listed in this section." 4. The following shall be added as Section 17.08.040.A.3 to the residential section of the Development Code: "3. Mixed Use Development Standards. For the purposes of establishing guidance for the application of individual land use regulations and development standards, all Mixed Use District development proposals are subject to master planning procedures as outlined in Section 17.20.030. Existing development standards for each land use category, as provided in Sections 17.08 through 17.24, shall be the basis of standards for each category within a mixed use development plan, but they may be modified by the City during the Master Plan review process. Development agreements between the property owners and the City may be used as implementation measures for any amended standards or review procedures." SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. th~ Rancho city of Cucamonga St Relx>r DATE: June 21,2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ANNEXATION 00-01 - U.C.P. INC. - A request to approve a statement of intention to annex an approximately 504 acre portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area generally located north of Highland Avenue between Hanley Avenue and Rochester Avenue - as described in Exhibit "A," attached and as shown in Exhibit "B," attached. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution of Intent to Annex, which authorizes staff to proceed with an application for annexation and a Plan for Services to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). BACKGROUND: In October 1999, the County of San Bernardino approved a Planned Development Plan for an approximately 250-acre residential development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere of Influence. Following the approval by the County in November 1999, the City filed a lawsuit regarding the adequacy of the environmental document for the project. As a result of the lawsuit, the City, County, and Project developer were required to meet in order to address the issues raised in the lawsuit (differences in development standards). Hence, a City Council subcommittee and City staff met on. various occasions with the project developer to discuss the project and the possibility of reaching a settlement agreement. Asettlementagreementwasreachedthroughrevisions and upgrades to the project. The City Council approved a draft settlement agreement on April 19, 2000. The County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors signed the agreement on June 1, 2000. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: ANNEXATION 00-01 June 21, 2000 Page 2 Further, representatives from the Etiwanda School District attended most of the meetings with the project developer (U.C.P. Inc.). The school representatives expressed their desire and consent to be part of any annexation effort into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The school district owns two parcels of land within the project and two parcels outside of the project area. City staff, because of the expanded annexation area, determined that in order to avoid the creation of a County Island within City boundaries, the properties located on the southwest section of the project site should also be made part of the annexation application. Therefore, the City directed the project developer to extend the boundaries of annexation area to include the school district parcels, the Southern California Edison right- of-way and a portion of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District land. The total annexation area is approximately 504 acres. ANALYSIS: The site is located within the West Valley Foothills Community Plan under the County's Jurisdiction. The site is currently designated under the County's General Plan for residential land use, Flood Way and Institutional. Under the City's Zoning and General Plan, the site is designated Low Density Residential, Utility Corridor, Public Land and Flood Control. The site was pre-zoned under the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (April 1, 1992), therefore only minor amendments to the ENSP will be required to develop the site. The development agreement application for the project is scheduled for the Planning Commission hearing on July 12, 2000, and for City Council hearing on August 2, 2000. In addition a copy of the settlement agreement and a pre-annexation and tolling agreement will be provided for your review during the City Council meeting. CONCLUSION: Adoption of the attached Resolution of Intent to annex is the first step leading to the annexation and development of the Etiwanda North area. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB: SS\Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map Resolution Declaring Intent to Annex PAGE 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF SECTION 20 AND THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 29 AND THE EAST HALF ONE-HALF OF SECTION 30, ALL W1THIN TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20; 1) THENCE NORTH 00°15'11" WEST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAiD SECTION 20, 2636.14 FEET TO THE WEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; 2) THENCE SOUTH 89°26'49'' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20, 2649.86 FEET TO THE CENTER ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20; 3) THENCE SOUTH 89°26'25'' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20, 1517.40 FEET; 4) THENCE SOUTH 44044'26" WEST, 3558.95 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WESTERLY 330.00 FEET OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; 5) THENCE SOUTH 00°19'13TM EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 35.04 FEET TO A POINT 50.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 29; 6) THENCE SOUTH 89°24'03'' EAST, PARALLEL WITH AND 50.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF SAID SOUTH LINE, 990.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; 7) THENCE SOUTH 00004'25,. EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 50.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20, ALSO BEING THE NORTH ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 8) THENCE SOUTH 00°11'03'' EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29, 2655.52 FEET TO THE CENTER ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 9) THENCE NORTH 89°25'52'' WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER, 985.80 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WESTERLY 330.00 FEET OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 10) THENCE SOUTH 00002'19'' WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 988.90 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 11) THENCE SOUTH 89°27'06'' EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH ONE-HALF, 328.48 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; 12) THENCE SOUTH 00°00'18" WEST, 1647.98 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 29; 13) THENCE NORTH 89°29'09,' WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 1978.37 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; 14) THENCE NORTH 89°36'29'' WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 30, 662.27 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30; 15) THENCE NORTH 00°04'55" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30. 1319.50 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 30, SAID NORTHERLY LINE ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT 13835 AS RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 262, PAGES 14 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; 16) THENCE NORTH 88°43'16" WEST, ALONG SAID TRACT 13835 BOUNDARY, 3.02 FEET; 17) THENCE NORTH 00°02'02'' EAST, ALONG SAID TRACT 13835 BOUNDARY, 329.87 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 13835; PAGE 2 OF 2 18) THENCE NORTH 89035'09'' WEST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 13835, 660.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE- HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 30 OF TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SB.M.; 19) THENCE NORTH 00°02'05" EAST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, 1022.71 FEET TO A POINT LYING 33.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST ONE-HALF; 20) THENCE SOUTH 89°34'33" EAST, PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID EAST ONE-HALF, 1327.25 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 30, ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 29; 21) THENCE NORTH 00°23'58'' WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 29, 2624.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 504.00 ACRES PREPARED IN THE OFFICES OF ALLARD ENGINEERING DATE MARK WARE, L.S. 5820 EXP: 6-30-04 12103.EXHA. BNDY F LEGEND /"~. I Existing City Boundary # N Proposed New City Boundary pePsons reliance upon the Information available herein, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Annexation 00 - 01 500 0 500 1000 Feet Prepared by Chds Bopko GIS Division June 7, 2000 rESOlUtiOn NO. ~-/~ ~ a RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF. PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN ROCHESTER AVNEUE AND HANLEY AVENUE - AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", A'I'I'ACHED AND AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B," ATTACHED. RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California; that WHEREAS, the above-described properties are located within and consistent with the established Sphere of Influence of the City, and contiguous to current City limits; and WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited (as defined under LAFCo), and a description of the boundaries of the territory is set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the annexation of the property will represent a logical extension of the City's boundaries and urban services; and WHEREAS, it is the City's intention to provide the usual and necessary urban services to the area upon annexation, as outlined in the Plan of Services; and WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino has approved Tentative Tract Map Nos. 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902 in respect to a portion of the above-described project area. WHEREAS, the City has determined that the annexation of the properties would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the properties will provide for development within the City in a manner consistent with the City's General Plan and with related development; and WHEREAS, the City Council as governing body of the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to initiate proceedings for a Change of Organization (Annexation) for the subject properties pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, Commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council as the governing body of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby adopt, approve, resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1: Application and proposal is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino for Change of Organization (Annexation) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga of the herein described property as outlined in the Justification form, which is Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, and is by this reference incorporated herein as set forth in accordance to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, SECTION 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certification copy of this Resolution with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino. S affR po t DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 21,2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Tamara L. Layne, Finance Officer ~ CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE THE UTILITY USER'S FEES RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council approval of utility user's fee reduction. BACKGROUND In May 1995, a systematic formula was adopted to phase out the utility user's fee beginning in fiscal year 1996/97. The proposed reductions were discussed in the most recent budget workshops and adopted by Council in the fiscal year 2000/01 budget with provisions for specific fee reductions. This amendment to the ordinance requires two readings with an effective date of August 31, 2000. The utility user's fee will be reduced from 3.08% to 2.46%, or 20.13%. Additionally, the maximum annual fee will be reduced from $22,170 to $17,590, or 20.66% for industrial/business users. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director hJtlayne~City Council staff reports~UUT reduction FY 2000-01. doc ORDINANCE NO. 858-D AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO UTILITY USER'S FEES. SECTION I: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 3.48.035.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "A. The maximum aggregate amount of the fees imposed by this chapter upon any one service user for utilities during any calendar year shall not exceed Twcnty Two Thousand, One Hundrcd end Seventy Dollars ($22,170.00) Seventeen Thousand, Five-Hundred and Ninety Dollars ($t7,590)." SECTION 2: Section 3.48.040.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: There is imposed a fee on the amounts paid for any intrastate telephone services by every person in the City using such services. The fee imposed by this section shall be at the rate of 3.08 pcrccnt (3.08%) 2.46 percent (2.46%) of the charges made for such services, and shall be paid by the person paying for such services." SECTION 3: Section 3.48.050.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read in words and figures, as follows: "A. There is imposed a fee upon every person using electrical energy in the City. The fee imposed by this section shall be at the rate of 3.08 pcrcent (3.08%) 2.46 percent (2.46%) of the charges made for such energy by an electrical corporation providing service in the City and shall be paid by the person using the energy. The fee applicable to electrical energy provided by a non-utility supplier shall be determined by applying the fee rate to the equivalent charge the service user would have incurred if the energy used had been provided by the electrical corporation franchised by the City. Non-utility suppliers shall install and maintain an appropriate utility-type metering system which will enable compliance with this section. 'Charges,' as used in this section, means 4/1 Ordinance No. 558-D Page 2 charges made for: (1) metered energy and (2) minimum charges for service, including customer charges, service charges, demand charges, standby charges, and all other annual and monthly charges, fuel or other cost adjustments authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission orthe Federal Energy Regulatory Commission." SECTION 4: Section 3.48.060.A.1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "A.1. There is imposed a fee upon every person in the City, other than a gas corporation or electrical corporation, using gas in the City which is transported through mains or pipes or by mobile transport. The fee imposed by this section shall be at the rate of 3.08 pcrcent (3.08%) 2.46 percent (2.46%) of the charges made for the gas and shall be paid by the person using the gas. The fee applicable to gas or gas transportation provided by non- utility suppliers shall be determined by applying the fee rate to the equivalent charges the service user would have incurred if the gas or gas transportation had been provided by the gas corporation franchised by the City." SECTION 5: Section 3.48.070.A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "A. There is imposed a fee upon every person in the city using water which is delivered through mains or pipes. The fee imposed by this section shall be at the rate of 3.08 pcrcent (3.08%) 2.46 percent (2.46%) of the charges made for such water and shall be paid by the person paying for such water." SECTION 6: Section 3.48.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby in words and figures, as follows: "A Whenever the calculation of the amount of any fee due and owing under this chapter is alleged to have resulted in an overpayment or a payment more than once, it may be refunded by the Finance Director as provided in subsections "B" and "C" of this section, provided a claim in writing therefor, stating under penalty of perjury the specific grounds upon which the claim is founded, is filed with the Finance Director within one year of the date of the claimed overpayment. The claim shall be on forms furnished by the Finance Director. amended to read, Ordinance No. 558-D Page 3 "B. A service supplier may claim a refund or take as credit against fees collected and remitted an amount overpaid or paid more than once when it is established that the person from whom the fee has been collected did not owe the fee. Any service user may obtain a refund of fees overpaid or paid more than once by filing a claim in the manner provided in subsection "A" of this section, but only when the service user having paid the fee to the service supplier establishes to the satisfaction of the Finance Director that the service user has been unable to obtain a refund from the service supplier who collected the fee." Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, whenever a service supplier, pursuant to an order of the California Public Utilities Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction, makes a refund to service users of charges for past utility services, the fees paid pursuant to this chapter on the amount of such refunded- charges shall also be entitled to claim a credit for such refunded fees against the amount of fee which is due upon the next monthly returns. In the event this chapter is repealed, the amounts of any refundable fees wild be borne by the City." SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall be deemed effective on August 31, 1999 August 31, 2000. SECTION 8: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation, such decision or legislation shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases are declared unconstitutional or preempted. SECTION 9: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. Ordinance No. 558-D Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of July, 2000. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Alexander, Biane, Curatalo, Dutton, Williams None None None ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERKof the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21 ,t day of June, 2000, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 5th day of July, 2000. Executed this 6th day of July, 2000, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk RAN POLICE DEPARTMENT Stag Report DATE: June 21, 2000 TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Mayor, Members of City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~ r CLOSURE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE DURING QUAKES GAME NIGHTS RECOMMENDATION Staffrecommends that fine City Council aulh3~ze fine opening of R~ Avenue dmhng fine weekday gmoes wifin fine utilization of lhe modified traffic plan. Rochester Avenue will remain closed during fine weekend gmnes (Friday, Satuntay, and Sunday) and on special event nights during fine week. When lhe attendance reaches fine 5,000 mark during fine weekday g~nes, staff recommmds City Council to re<tircet fine Police Deparlment and the Traffic Engineerto review and evaluate fine fea~'bility of re. closing Rochester Avenue. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Police Department has been dimeted to review the necessity of fine closure of Rochester Avenue during Quakes gane Cunmtly, Rochester Avmue is closed at Anow Highway for northbound lraflic, and south of Sebaslion Way for southbound traffic. The botws of fine closure is mound 5:00 p :n. on Monday tlmugh Saturday, and at 1:00 p m on Sunday, ~ fine end of finegmnes The Police Departmint met with Traffic Engineer, Jon Gillespie, to review and analyze fine lraflic situation and ceane up wifin fine following recornmcxndatior~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CLOSURE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE JUNE1,2000 PAGE 2 Due to the drop in attendance (average 1,500 durh3g weekday ~znes) and the limited vehicular lraffic. Staff recommends olx~g o fRochester Avenue during the weekday games with lhe ion of lhe following modified traffic plan. Traffic cones will be set up along lane number 2 for soulhl~und stadima Waflic at Sebastian Way to Stadiuan Pankway, lane nurnlxrlwillbeopentottwaughWaffic. Norlhbound lraflic will be dimcted to either tum lefi (west) at Jack Bexmy Ddve or mm right (east) at Staditnn Parkway. Traffic cones will be set up to e'lnnin~ all northbound ld-hand tum lane at Stadium Pa~e,vay. Both lanes 1 and 2 will be open to all northbound traffic. The traffic signals at Sebastion Way, Staditm Way, and Jvck Benny Drive will rm'hain on standan] cycle to allow for nonhal lraflic flow. The modif. ed traffic plan would allow ~mughtra~ic(n~thards~u~hb~unds)~nR~chesterAvmuewith~utin~e~eringwithstadi~c~r~~c (refer to ~nached trailtic plan). Du~nglheweekend(Friday, Satmday, and Sunday), the cunmt traffic plan will be in effect Ano ttmughtrafl~c signwillbe posted on Rochester Avenue south of Sebaslian Way, banicades will be set up along Stadium Pa~cway, requiting all southboundlrafficto eilhermm leffor~ghtinto the stadiumpa~dng lots. Anoth~ughlmffic signis alsoposted atArrow Hwy. Banicades me setup along Jack Berry Drive, mstaicted all mr~qlx~und lraflic to a lett-hand tum only inlo the stadium pa~ng lots. Lieutemnls David Lau and Lee WafidmmetwilhPatFdippone, General Mmag~ with Quakes, onMay 18, 200to discuss 1he proposed mcxtified traffic plan. Mr. FHippone has no objection to 1he req3pexig of Rochester Avenue during the ~veekday games h Mclition, the actual physical closure of Rochester Avenue during the weekend g~xnes will continue to be accomplished (F~day~Sa~~hy~ar~Sunday)~byp~acingbarricadesand~ra~icc~neswi~~mtc~rrnnenceunti~6~minutesbef~re~aestart~f Chief off lice RH:AN:an Attachment -2- SEBASTIAN WAY '~ L DRIVEWAY +. ........ -~ PARKING LOT EXiT ROCHESTER FOOTHILL BOULEVARD {) STADIUM PARKING STADIUM JACDK BEENNY ONLY PARKWAY ' ~ ......... !,_- -: -: - !": _;-! :-'_~ .,. w .............. ~ .- , ....~---~ -; ..... ARROW ROUTE MILLIKEN AVE ,2C ...._'!_":' --~- ROCHESTER VICINITY MAP ROCHESTER AVE EPICENTER ENTRY PLAN ROCHESTER AVENUE FOOTHILL BLV0 TO ARROW ROUTE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 21, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane O'Neal, Assistant To The City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL FOUNDATION SUBCOMMITTEE'S TO FILL VACANCIES Recommendation COMMUNITY RECOMMENDTIONS The City Council approve the Subcommittee's recommended appointments of D. Anthony "Tony" Mize and Liko Smith. Background The City Council's Community Foundation Subcommittee, made up of Diane Williams and Bob Dutton, met May 4, 2000 to discuss filling the two vacancies created by resignations. Their recommendation to fill the two vacancies are D. Anthony "Tony" Mize and Liko Smith. Diane O'Neal Assistant To The City Manager 5/8 DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 21, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane O'Neal, Assistant To The City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO FILL VACANCIES Recommendation The City Council approve the Subcommittee's recommendations to re-appoint Ann Punter and go out for a 30-day recruitment to fill the one other vacancy. Background The two terms expiring June 30, 2000 are Mark Whitehead and Ann Punter's. Mark submitted a letter to the Mayor and Members of the City Council indicating his pleasure for having served on the Commission for the past 12 years, but that he wished to spend more time with the family and to give others the opportunity to serve on the Commission (a copy of his letter is attached). Arm Punter submitted a letter to the Mayor respectfully asking that she be re-appointed to the Commission to fulfill work yet to be completed by the Commission (a copy of her letter is attached). For the one vacancy to be filled, the Subcommittee is recommending a 30-day recruitment, with the Subcommittee reviewing, interviewing, and making a recommendation to the entire City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The Subcommittee also is reconunending that Staff send courtesy letters with applications to those individuals who have previously applied to the Park & Recreation Commission but were not selected. Diane O'Neal Assistant To The City Manager Attachments: Mark Whitehead and Arm Punter's Letters 3 William J. Alexander, Mayor The City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 May 10,2000 Dear Bill, It is with sincere regret that 1 write this letter. My term on the Park and Recreation Commission expires on June 30, 2000. I have been a member of this Commission for 12 years and have greatly enjoyed the opportunity to serve my community. During these past four years, due to increased job and home life commitments, 1 have not been able to give all the time and attention 1 feel is necessary to fully and competently perform the duties of my position as a commissioner. Because of these continuing pressures. I can not commit to another 4 years on the Commission. 1 also am a believer in term limits and feel that after 12 years I should relinquish my seat and allow someone else, with flesh ideas and ideals, to continue the work of the Commission so that it truly represents the desires of the citizens. New faces ~vith new ideas can help us continue to be the Star of the Inland Empire. I have enjoyed working for the City and with the Community Services Department and hope someday to once again be able to serve on behalf of the citizens of our fine city. Thank you for your understanding and your support of the Commission over the years. Sincerely, Mark Whitehead Vice-Chair of the Park and Recreation Commission 7050 Novara Place Rancho Cucamonga. California 91701 cc: Diane Willjams Kevin McArdle Ann Punter 06/86/2000 16:58 9093952728 OPD PAGE J~rle 6, 2000 82/02 William Alexander, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10510 Ciric Center Drive Raneho Cueamonga, Ca. Honoxable Mayor, I have just been reminded that my appointmere to the Parks and Recreation Commission for the Cil3' of Rancho Cueamonga will be expiring this month. It is hard to believe two years has already passed. I am submitting this letter to respectfully request that you and the City Council consider me for reappointment to the Parks and Recreation Commission_ I know this wilt be the third time I have asked for this appointment. I am aware there a~ many good people in the City who may want to tO' tbr this appointment_ I only ask you consider me since there are still some umesolved issues I ~nould like to see to conclusion. We all k_uow the Central Park is an ongoing issue and our f~TSt lry waS not totally successful. This does not mean we should give up and as you know this is something neax and dear to Secondly, 1 would like to see the first "'pooch park" in the City get up and rmming. Again, please conside~ this letter as a request for consideration for reappointment to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Sincerely, RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY ~ERVICE~ SlagRq: ort TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II DATE: June 21, 2000 SUBJECT: PARK, RECREATION FACILITIES & COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Central Park: · A reception has been scheduled for the Task Force members on June 20m at Lions West Community Center at 6:30 p.m. Epicenter: The Epicenter hosted the third community event in Festival 2000 series - a Memorial Day salute by the Inland Valley Philharmonic. About 700 people showed up to enjoy the show. The ArdJazz Festival, also a part of the Festival 2000 series, took place earlier in the month on May 13t~. The Sports Complex was also the site for the second Hillside Community Church Soapbox Derby and Mega Fun Kids Playday on May 29m, Memorial Day. Staff estimated that attendance was approximately the same as last year approximately 20,000 to 24,000. · Budapest Productions filmed part of another episode of the Arliss sedes for HBO on Tuesday, May 30th from 5:00 a.m, to 8:00 p.m. Guest stars were Tommy Lasorda and Ed Asner. CITY COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILITIES & COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 Etiwanda Creek Park: City staff met with representatives of RC Spot and their fencing contractor for a fence installation pre-construction meeting. Installation is scheduled to begin June 5t" and is expected to take 2-3 days. The City also delivered a salvaged ddnking fountain to the group for them to install concurrently with the fence construction, as per a prior agreement. City Council approved Dog Park Rules signs have been ordered and will be installed upon the completion of the fence construction. The park can be used as soon as construction is complete and signage is installed. · The Soccer/Football field annual renovation is almost complete. · The Playground resilient surface project is progressing as planned. Heritage Community Park: Construction for the Spdnt cell phone tower has begun. Irrigation laterals, mainlines, contrel wires, secudty lighting wires and a walkway light pole have been damaged by the installation process. Park and facility maintenance are repairing as fast as they can behind the centrector and keeping a running tab of all time and materials to back*charge Sprint. · Parking lots have been slurry sealed and re-striped. Beryl Park: City staff met with SANBAG representative Nadine Richards, regarding freeway sound wall construction along the south side of the Beryl Parks. Agreements were made concerning the protection "in place" (by SANBAG) of drainage structures, trees and irrigation, The City will be required to abandon the irrigation lateral line and heads running along the southern fence line of West Beryl and reinstall them when the construction is complete. However, SANBAG will require the sound wall centrector to replace any turf that dies as a result of the construction and irrigation abandonment. · The soccer field renovation project has been approved for June 12 - September 15. The A.Y.S.O. season begins September 16. Milliken Park: The Parks and Landscaping Maintenance Superintendent made a "Tree Registry" presentation to a third grade class at Terra Vista Elementary School. The class saved money to buy and plant a tree at Milliken Park. The tree planting took place on Thursday, June 1't. Golden Oak Park: · The park is in the turf maintenance period. Estimated completion date is late summer. -2- C~Y COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILI11ES & COMMUNI1Y SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 Mountain View Park: · The park was hydro-seeded in late April. Estimated completion date is late summer. Lions West Community Center: · Installation of carpeting in the Filippi Room is scheduled for June 13-16t~, 2000. B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Seniors: Visit by Governor George Bush. On May 15t" , Presidential candidate George W. Bush visited the Senior Center to make a policy speech on Social Secudty. This was an extraordinary opportunity for the seniors and staff to showcase the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center to the nation. This was an exciting time as well for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The seniors are still buzzing about that remarkable day. Senior Billiards Tournament, Friday June 9, 10:00 a.m. The Senior Center hosted the Annual Senior's Billiards Tournament earlier in the month. Anyone 50 years of age or older was invited to participate. Independence Day Celebration, Thursday, June 29, 10:00 a.m. Bdng out Old Glory and show your patriotism as the Senior Center celebrates our country's day of independence. The celebration will be full of red, white and blue activities. Dianne Chavarda, performing all the standard patriotic songs, will provide lively entertainment. Refreshments and games will also be provided. This event is co-sponsored by the V.I.P. Club. Reminiscence, Wednesday, July 12, 10:15 a.m. Enjoy the "good old days" with super entertainer/impersonator AI Best, performing many of the great standards. This free fun day will also include refreshments and colorful decorations. Old Fashioned Ice Cream Social and Magic, Wednesday, August 2, at 1:00 p.m. Be sure to be at the Senior Center on this special day as the "Amazing Dana," an extraordinary magician, will be hera to celebrate Old Fashioned Ice Cream Day. Not only will you be entertained but also you get your fill of ice cream. Anti-Crime Prevention Program. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department will be offering a sedes of free workshops at the Senior Center that will focus on crime prevention. The program will be aimed at educating the public, particularly seniors. All workshops are free and will be held on the 3~d Monday of the month beginning at 9:30 a.m. They include: Senior Safety (June 19), Frauds and Scams (July 17) and Residential Safety (August 21). · The Senior Advisory Committee, will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, June 26, 2000 at 9:00 a.m. at the Senior Center. Senior Legislature Elections, August 8, 2000. The San Bemardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services in conjunction with the Senior Affairs Commission is conducting an election for one Senior Senator and three Senior Assembly Representatives as delegates to -3- CITY COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILITIES & COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 the Califomia Senior Legislature. The election will be held on August 8, 2000, and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center has been selected as a polling site. The Senior Advisory Committee will provide the necessary manpower at the poll site. Hospitality Dinner, Wednesday, June 21. On the 3~ Wednesday of each month the Senior Center hosts a dinner for anyone new to the Center. It is an opportunity to learn about the programs and services offered at the Center and to make new fdends~ Human Services: Home Owner's and Renter's Assistance is scheduled at the Senior Center each Tuesday through August 22. To qualify for the assistance a homeowner or renter must meet income requirements, be 62 years or older, blind or disabled. The Doctor Is In - During the month of June, Dr. Harvey D. Cohen, M.D. will present a free health lecture at the Senior Center on Tuesday, June 20, at noon. The topic is "Cancer Screening." Dr. Cohen will also present an evening lecture on Wednesday, June 21, at 7:00 p.m. The topic of this presentation is "Stroke." Women's Wellness - Dr. Anita Kuni, M.D. will provide a free Women's Wellness lecture at the Senior Center on Tuesday, June 27, at 1:00 p.m. The topic of her presentation is "Stress Management." EIder Law Matters - Attorney Gregory A. Wood will present a free financial lecture at the Senior Center on Friday, June 23, 11:00 a.m. His topic is "Social Security Benefits, Medicare Benefits and Survivors Benefits". in addition he is available at the Center for free counseling sessions to help seniors dealing with issues such as long term care, Medicare, Medical, living trusts, estate planning wills and durable powers of attorney. Trips and Tours: Hollywood Bowl, July 4t'. What better way to celebrate the 4t' of July than with a picnic (on your own), a fabulous concert feature Glenn Campbell and a tremendous fireworks show at the Hollywood Bowl. (Some seats are still available.) Catalina Island, August 19. The quaint town of Avalon with its cobblestone streets, offers young and old alike the chance to enjoy shopping, dining, snorkeling and a variety of tours. Cost is $65 per person. (Some seats are still available.) Danish Days in Solvang, September 16. Danish Days are held annually since 1936. Learn to bake Danish pastdes or watch cloggere dance. Lunch is on your own so you can sample the local street tare or try an authentic smorgasbord at one of the popular restaurants. (Some seats are still available.) Palm Spring Follies, November 8. Step back to the 30's and 40's for a fabulous musical review in the tradition of the Ziegfeld Follies! You will have time pdor to the show to enjoy a lunch on your own. (Some seats are still available.) -4- CITY COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILITIES & COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 Volunteers: · Dudng the upcoming summer months staff will be recruitin and placing volunteers with the Beach Party and Classic Car Show (June 17t' ), July 48 Celebration, a Night of Magic (August 19th) and coaches of various sports teams. · The table below summarizes departmental usage of volunteers for month of April 2000: Administration 5 10 Sports 16 76 $1,064 Senior & Human 47 219 $3,066 Services Special Events 58 390 $5,460 Youth Programs 25 350 $4,900 Total 151 1,045 $14,630 · Dollar value based on $14.00 per hour. Teens: · The Teen Center celebrated spdng break with extended hours and lots of prize drawings. The teens had a fun and safe place to hang out with their friends. The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) has been busy at several community events, including the Skate Park Safety Clinic and Demonstration (April 29t~) and the Art and Jazz Fest (May 13th). The TRAC members were recognized for their year of service at the May Park and Recreation Commission Meeting. The quarterly safety clinic for the Skate Facility was held on Saturday, April 29t" from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and was a resounding success. Approximately 400 - 500 youth and their families were on hand to watch professional skaters demonstrate their skills, talk about safety and the importance of weadng safety equipment. A DJ provided music and a local food vendor sold snacks and drinks. Youth Activities: · Playschool graduation was held at Red Hill Park on May 30th. Over 220 children (our largest graduating class) graduated and will be going on to kindergarten. · Registration for summer Day Camp and Kinder Camp is continuing. Registration for the summer Kid Explorers program began in May. Grapevine: · The summer issue of The Grapevine was distributed to residents in mid-May. The cover features the City's first annual Fourth of July Fireworks Show at Chaffey College. -5- CITY COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILITIES & COMMUNIIY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 Youth Sports: The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: 65 22 74 The Aquatic Learn to Swim Program begins on June 26t~. This year the program will take place at both the Alta Loma High School pool (from 8:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m.) and the Etiwanda High School pool (from 4:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m,). Besides traditional swim lessons, pdvate lesson, pool parties and open swim is offered. The first day of registration was June 10t" from 8:00 a.m. until 12:00 noon at the Civic Center. Throe thousand four hundred (3,400) children and expected to take lessons during this 10 week program. Organized Youth Sports: Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit organized youth sport leagues throughout the City. The table that follows indicates participation figures for the month of May 2000. Facility use noted only notes City facilities. A number of groups also used school sites. Organization Numbe~ Number Residency Number Teams Participants Percentage Spectators AYSO 94 3,624 92% 5,436 ACE Youth 46 1,560 91% 2,340 Softball ACE T-Ball 15 468 85% 702 Alta Loma 33 3, 192 100% 4 ]88 Little League CYSA 32 1,660 85% 2,490 Citrus Liffie 30 2.912 95% 4,368 League Cucamonga 2 102 80% 153 Dodgers Deer Canyon 29 388 100% 582 Little League Rancho Little 31 496 99% 744 League RC Pony RC Spidts RC SoP. ball Vineyard Little League 5 472 100% 708 3 684 80% 1,028 28 328 86% 492 35 660 100% 990 City Facilities Used For Games & Practice, Bear Gulch Park Beryl East Park Beryl West Park Etiwanda Creek Park Red Hill Park Spruce Park Beryl Park Heritage Park Red Hill Park Red Hill Park Red Hill Park Windrows Park Coyote Canyon Park Hermosa Park Milliken Park Old Town Park Epicenter & Spoi'ts Complex Old Town Park Hedtage Park Red Hill Park Windrows Park Red Hill Park Ellena Park Windrows Park Kenyon Park -6- CITf COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILITIES & COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 RC Family Sports Center: · Activities at the Sports Center for the reporting period are summarized in the table below: Activity Youth Volleyball Basketball Full Court-Leagues Three-on-Three Basketball Leagues Racquetball Singles League # Participants Age/Gender # Teams/Leagues/Classes 80 8-12/Girls 8 teams 120 Adu It/Males 12 teams 40 Adult/Males 8 teams 8 Adult/Males I league Youth Sports Summer Camp begins on June 26t". The Camp will run from 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. It is anticipated that approximately two hundred and seventy-five (275) children ages 6-12 will participate in the Camp throughout the summer. · The table below provides drop-in/open play participation at the R.C. Family Sports Center: Adult Basketball 971 Youth Basketball 733 Adult Racquetball 429 Youth Racquetball 38 Adult Volleyball 103 Youth Volleyball 59 Jazzercise 1,025 Adult Sports: · The table below summadzes adult sports participation during the reporting pedod: Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Academy: Workshops - Vocal Expression and Performance, Tiny Tunes Song and Dance, Dance Production, and T.V. Commercial Workshops will continue on a five-week basis throughout August of 2000. Attendance is great and interest continues to grow with each new session. The performing art classes are being offered at the Lions Community Center West until a permanent site is found. -7- CITY COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILrI1ES & COMMUNIIY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 Special Performances - On Saturday, June 10t" an afternoon of incredible entertainment was offered free of charge for the community as composer and performer Ray De La Paz and artistic director and choreographer Bondana performed in "A Celebration of Life". The Almost Amazing Show was a fresh theatrical look at the world's most intriguing stodes through music and dance. On Saturday, June 17b, J & R Talent, a full service company offered a free one day seminar for individuals who were anxious to get started in the television, film and theater industries. Their company has helped many aspiring actors and actresses with acting classes, photographer referrals, litho places, resumes and landing an agent. The seminar took place from 12:00 noon - 2:00 p.m. at Lions West Community Center. Community Wide Special Events: Art & Jazz Festival - The Art & Jazz Fest, the second of the events in the Festival 2000 Series, took place on Saturday, May 13, 2000, from 11:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m., at the Epicenter. Music was performed throughout the day by the Alta Loma High School Jazz Band, the Etiwanda Jr. High School Jazz Band, the Chaffey College J~77 Ensemble, and jazz artists Nuance and the Art of Sax. A wide variety of food vendors were available throughout the day. A few local artists and several crafters displayed their work along the concourse area. Filippi winery generously donated wines for a wine tasting area in the Pavilion. Hometown Buffet, Caf~ Calato, Soup Plantation, 42"d St. Bagel, Felipe's and Twins Caf~ donated foods for the V.I.P. reception that took place just pdor to the concert in the third base caf{~-. The concert in the stadium featured "Dem Brooklyn Bums" and "The Royal Crown Revue" and had people of all ages dancing in the aisles. An estimated 1,000 people attended the event throughout the day. Inland Empire Philharmonic Concert - On Saturday, May 27th the third event in the Festival 2000 Sedes took place at the Epicenter. The event featured a patriotic concart featuring the 70- piece Inland Empire Philharmonic. The evening's musical program included pieces such as the Star Spangled Banner, God Bless America, the Battle Hymn of the Republic, an Armed Forces service song medley, the 1812 Overture, as well as assorted popular songs featuring the musical artist, Patty Scarborough. A meet and greet reception took place after the concert in the third base caf~. Target, 7-Up Bottling Company, the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, Charter Communications and Mervyns were the presenting sponsors for this event. In addition, 5 Star Catedng provided a supporting sponsorship for the food for the meet and greet. Staff estimates that the event was attended by approximately 800 community members. The Beach Party Fest - A Beach Party and Classic Car Show, the fourth event in the Festival 2000 Series, will take place on Saturday, June 17, 2000, from 10:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. at the Epicenter. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distdct will play host to a classic car show. In addition they will provide an early morning pancake breakfast for the community. An adult co-ed softball tournament will add to the excitement and a variety of games, face painters, moon bounces and more will be on hand for some family fun. A free community concert will take place in the stadium at 12:30 p.m. featuring "The Stingrays Surf Band" and the popular "PAPA DOO RUN RUN." -8- CITY COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILITIES & COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 2|, 2000 Facilities: Hedtage Park Equestrian Center - The Equestrian Center is used continually by the resident equestrian clubs. The table below summarizes the use of the facility during the reporting pedod. May 3 Alta Loma Riding Club - General Meeting 7:30-9:00 p.m. May 6 St Jude Benefit Ride 9:00-11:00 a.m. May 13 Play Day Horse Show 9:00-12 noon May 15 4-H General Meeting 7:00-9:00 p.m. May 16 Alta Loma Riding Club - General Meeting & 7:00-9:00 p.m. Elections Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy - ICC Dressage Show Alta Loma Riding Club - General Meeting Citizen Patrol - Sensitivity Training 4-H Year End Awards AIta Loma Riding Club - General Meeting & Installation of Officers Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy - Schooling Dressage May 21 June 7 June 10 June 19 June 20 June 25 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. 7:30-9:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. 7:00-9:00 p.m. 7:00-9:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. Park Reservations: Applications for park reservations increase significantly during the spdng and summer months. The table below summarizes the park applications processed to date for the timeframe of May through mid-June, 2000. Shelter Red Hill Attendant Applications Number Hours of Us Fees Receive~ Months of Use Processed Rentals Coyote Canyon Heritage 2,860 36 resident 43 208.5 $1,957.00 May 7 non-resident 2,860 48 resident 55 249.0 $2,431.00 June 7 non-resident 205 6 resident 6 23.0 $ 125.00 May 0 non-resident 495 12msident 13 59.0 $ 395.00 June 1 non-resident 571 17 resident 17 61.5 $ 470.00 May -9- CITY COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILmES & COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 0 non-resident 1,515 21 resident 22 1 non-resident 92.0 $ 619.00 June Hermosa 485 11 resident 12 55.0 $ 289.00 May 1 non-resident 510 15 resident 16 78.5 $ 446.00 June 1 non-resident TOTAL 9,501 85 resident 184 826.5 $6,732.00 May-mid June 18 non-resident Park and Recreation Commission: · The following items were discussed/acted upon at the Commission's May 18. 2000 meeting: -Presentation of Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) end of the year recognition awards. -Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee. -Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee. -Consideration of light variance request for All-Star Tournaments hosted by Alta Loma Little League and Deer Canyon Little League on July 1-August 10, 2000 at Heritage Park. -Consideration of FallANinter field allocation for youth sports groups. -Review of field light fee waiver policy. -Update Central Park Task Force, -Update General Plan. -Update Community Foundation. -Update Trails, Sports and Senior Advisory Committees. -Update Census 2000. · The Park and Recreation Commission's June 15, 2000 meeting included the following items: -Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee. -Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee. -Request for waiver for regular Senior Advisory Committee meetings scheduled for July 24t~ and August 28t". -Review of conceptual park plans for Rancho Summit Development. -Review and status of Community Development Block Grant Funding requests. -Community Services Network annual review and one-year trail period review. -Discussion of marketing plan for the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter. -Request for amendment of light fee waiver policy for youth sports recreation and travel organizations currently ineligible for existing light fee waiver. -Update General Plan. -Update Community Foundation. -Update Trails, Sports and Senior Advisory Committees. -10- 331 CITY COUNCIL PARK, RECREATION FACILITIES & COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE JUNE 21,2000 Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The following items were discussed at the Foundation's June 13, 2000 meeting: -Sub-Committee update reports and discussion regarding the Founders Night Gale - An Evening of Elegance to be held November 4, 2000. -Sub-Committee reports and discussion regarding Community Foundation Action Plan. -Election of Officers. -Consideration and discussion regarding adoption of Community Foundation budget for FY 00/01. -Discussion regarding Community Foundation Action Plan. Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter: · The following activities took place at the Epicenter dudng the reporting period: -City/Community Services Department - May 27, 2000- Inland Empire Philharmonic Concert -a Festival 2000 Series event. -Hillside Community Church/City - May 28-29, 2000 - Soapbox Derby and Mega Play Day (Co-sponsored activity). -Budapest Films - May 30, 2000 - Commercial Filming HBO-Arliss series. -inland Valley Daily Bulletin/City - June 8-9, 2000 - All Star Practice and Game (Co- sponsored activity). -Etiwanda High School- June 14, 2000- Graduation. -Rancho Cucamonga High School - June 15, 2000 - Graduation. -City/Community Services Department - June 17, 2000 - Beach Party and Classic Car Show-a Festival 2000 Series event. · Staff is also working with representatives on the following future events at the facility: -San Bemardino County Police Athletic Federation - June 25-July1, 2000 - Police and Fire Games (Co-sponsored activity at Epicenter and Red Hill Park) -City/Community Services Department - August 19, 2000 - Night of Magic - a Festival 2000 Series event. -Vipers - Fall season - Semi-professional football. R~e_ctfully submitted, . Ri~~ Cc~m pment Director Community Services Director hICOMMSERIAC~uncil&BoardstCityCounciiIStaffReportstUpdate6.21.00. doc -11 -