Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/07/01 - Workshop Minutes - PC-HPCCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
July 1, 1992
Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission to order at 5:15 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains
Room at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Suzanne Chitiea, Larry McNiel, John
Melcher, Wendy Vallette
ABSENT:
Peter Tolstoy
STAFF PRESENT:
Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal
Planner; Scott Murphy, Associate Planner; Betty Miller,
Associate Engineer; Laura Bonaccorsi, Landscape Designer
, , , ,
PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 92-05 - LEWIS HOMES - Pre-application review for a 13.7
acre residential project located at the southeast corner of Base Line Road and
Mountain View.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, gave an overview of the pre-application review
process and the desires to be achieved through this review.
Start Bell, Lewis Homes, explained the general concept of the project. Mr.
Bell then introduced Kermit Dorius, Dorius Architects, to explain some of the
concepts and details of the project.
Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, outlined the staff's concerns with the
project for which direction from the Planning Commission was needed. These
points included:
1. Density
2. Product Type
3. Site Planning
4. Unit Size
5. Amenities
6. Architecture
Commissioner Vallette stated that she would rather see an attached product
with more open space than the proposed project in which the units appear
packed in together.
Commissioner Chitiea felt that the single family units were acceptable but
that some duplex units might be considered to add variety to the
streetscape. She felt that the wide-shallow lot configuration was more
appropriate than the narrow-deep lot configuration.
Commissioner Melcher noted that the Development Code does not require
amenities for single family projects at this density. He thought the proposed
single family detached project at 9 dwelling units per acre would create the
best amenity package. Mr. Melcher felt that the wide-shallow lots were
preferable to the narrow lots but that both solutions were good. He did not
see a problem with the grid-iron pattern proposed. In fact, Mr. Melcher
thought that curvilinear streets often create more problems. He was concerned
about the use of private streets unless they were developed to the City's
Engineering standard.
Chairman McNiel concurred that the single family detached product at
9 dwelling units per acre was acceptable. He also preferred the wide-shallow
lots.
Commissioner Vallette stated that she would not choose either site plan. She
felt that a more innovative site plan could be created. She did not think the
proposed site plan was creative.
Commissioner Chitiea did not mind short straight streets but objected to long
straight streets.
Commissioner Melcher did not feel that there were any long streets present
within the subdivision and that either plan was acceptable. He noted there
would be a variety of visual impacts as one drives through the project. He
did, however, suggest that the frontage road along Base Line Road be deleted.
Chairman McNiel found the street pattern acceptable but felt that the
integration of other concepts (i.e., duplex) might make for a more attractive
streetscape.
The Commissioners all agreed that the unit size proposed by the applicant was
acceptable for this project.
Commissioner Melcher noted that he lives in a ll7-unit complex with a pool,
spa, rest rooms, and a picnic area and those amenities receive limited use.
Commissioner Chitiea felt it important to provide an area for open play that
was of sufficient size to allow for such activities as frisbee and volleyball.
Commissioner Vallette felt that more open space was needed throughout the
project. She suggested this could be accomplished through more innovative
site planning.
Chairman McNiel suggested that a closer physical relationship between the
amenities was necessary. Also, he felt more open space was needed within the
project.
Commissioner Melcher agreed that combining the open space areas was
preferable.
Planning Commission Minutes -2- July 1, 1992
Mr. Murphy recapped the direction of the Commission majority to be as follows:
The single family detached product at 9 dwelling units per acre was
acceptable and consideration should be given to introducing some duplexes
into the project.
The wide-shallow lot configuration was preferred over the narrow-deep lot
configuration.
The Commissioners were split on the design of the street layout but agreed
that additional variation was needed for the streetscape.
The unit size proposed was acceptable.
More open space was necessary for the project.
The architecture, with the provision for siding
building, was found to be acceptable.
The Commissioners concurred with the recommendations.
around the entire
, , , , ,
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting concluded at 5:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Bullet
Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes -3- July 1, 1992