The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020-005 - ResolutionRESOLUTION NO.2020-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 18-114, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. On April 18, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On November 21, 2018, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 18-114, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for described capital improvements and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 4. The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) requires that project costs and fees, including Transportation Development Fees (DIF), be updated biennially. 5. The fee increase is based on recent construction costs received by the City and the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Price Index for Construction Items, from 2nd Quarter 2017 to 4th Quarter 2019 of 12.5% resulting in an overall effective increase of 11.8%. All summaries and calculations are hereby incorporated. 6. On February 19, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 7. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: a. The purpose of the fee revision is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 1 of 13 c. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and d. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and f. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. 3. DEFINITIONS: "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. 2. "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. 3. "Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing is equal to one EDU. 4. PAYMENT OF FEE: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid per Chapter 3.28 City -Wide System Fee for Transportation Development subsection 3.28.020 Fees established of the RCMC. The City Engineer, or their designee, shall calculate and determine the amount of the fee based upon the rate then in effect at the time of payment. 5. FEE SCHEDULE: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $12,131 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 6. EDU/LAND USE EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 2 of 13 Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU 7. USE OF FEE: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 8. ADMINISTRATION FEE: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9. FEE REVIEW: The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts for the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein amended shall not be imposed by the City until 60 days from the date of the public hearing, and not until January 1, 2022 for residential subdivisions for which a Final Map or Parcel Map has been recorded as of the date of adoption of this resolution. 11. JUDICIAL CHALLENGE: Any judicial action proceeding to appeal, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 12. CERTIFICATION: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 3 of 13 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 2020. L. Dennis Michael, ayor ATTEST: nice C, ,Reynolds, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 19th day of February 2020. AYES: Hutchison, Kennedy, Michael, Scott, Spagnolo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None Executed this 201h day of February, 2020, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 4 of 13 Exhibit "A" Transportation Fee Program Projects & Project Costs Ft�eway !nll�r+char�es F1 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $946,169 F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $1,467,771 F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $21,903,000 F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange $54,593,100 F5 Grove Avenue / 4th Street at 1-10 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $5,977,347 Total: $84,887,386 R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $14,398,764 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $1,168,903 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $1,168,903 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $1,891,333 Total: $18,627,904 BtP' �1r1�te B1 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $2,723,014 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $1,291,107 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch - Widen Existing Bridge $1,267,198 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,442,533 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $8,239,440 B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,588,646 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,635,136 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,753,564 Total: $20,940,638 Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 5 of 13 Project Estimate S1 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $884,647 S2 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,789,219 S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O 1-15 Freeway to 1,300' E/O 1-15 Freeway - Widen South Side $1,485,039 S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen North Side $1,311,031 S5 Banyan Street - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New Alignment $10,811,028 S6 Base Line Road - Etiwanda Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen North Side 2 to 3 Lanes $1,305,718 S7 Cherry Avenue - Wilson Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen West Side $1,582,004 S8 Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,694,910 S9 East Avenue - 1-15 to Victoria Street - Various Bottlenecks $1,083,892 S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $1,720,148 S11 East Avenue - Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way - New $581,795 S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $5,479,235 S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue - Widen East Side $374,580 S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Curb and Gutter East Side Only $1,233,990 S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way - New $697,357 S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $1,599,272 S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to 700' E/O Hellman Avenue - Widen North Side Only $2,563,618 S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue - Widen Intersection $9,623,528 S19 Foothill Boulevard - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $2,602,138 S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $1,426,593 S21 Grove Avenue - San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $878,006 S22 Haven Avenue - Base Line Road to 1-210 Freeway - Widen West Side Only $16,388,556 S23 Lower Crest Road - Day Creek Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - New $2,133,249 S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $3,222,454 S25 Milliken Avenue - 5th Street to 700' S/O 5th Street - Widen West Side Only $405,131 Project Estimate S26 Victoria Street- East Property Line of Etiwanda High School to 1-15 $390,520 Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 6 of 13 Freeway - Improve Both Shoulders S27 Vintage Drive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300' W/O Etiwanda Avenue - New $1,142,337 S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $9,064,314 S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $750,489 S30 Wilson Avenue - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $7,969,796 S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock - New $12,486,013 Total: $104,680,609 Tftft Siwws projod =. T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $464,905 T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $464,905 T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $464,905 T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $464,905 T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $464,905 T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $464,905 T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $464,905 T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $464,905 T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $464,905 T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $464,905 T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $464,905 T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $464,905 T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $464,905 T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $464,905 T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $464,905 T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $464,905 T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $464,905 T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $464,905 T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $464,905 T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $464,905 T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue (West) $464,905 T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $464,905 T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $464,905 Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 7 of 13 T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $464,905 T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $464,905 T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $464,905 T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $464,905 T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $464,905 T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $464,905 T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $464,905 T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $464,905 T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $464,905 T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $464,905 T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $464,905 T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $464,905 T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $464,905 T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $464,905 T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $464,905 T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $464,905 T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $464,905 T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $464,905 T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $464,905 T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $464,905 T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $464,905 T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $464,905 T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $464,905 T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $464,905 T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West) $464,905 T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $464,905 T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $464,905 prat ct Estimate T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $464,905 T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 8 of 13 T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $66,415 T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T70 Milliken Avenue at Millenium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 Total: $27,097,305 Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 9 of 13 Program Totals Category Estimate Freeway Interchanges $84,887,386 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $18,627,904 Bridges $20,940,638 Streets $104,680,609 Traffic Signals $27,097,305 Signal Interconnect System $10,227,904 Total: $266,461,747 Item Program Total $266,461,747 Less Fund Balance as of 2005 -$20,000,000 Sub -Total $246,461,747 Administration Fee (15%) $36,969,262 Total: $283,431,010 Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 10 of 13 EXHIBIT "B" TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES Land Use Type Fee Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $12,131 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/ Accessory Dwelling Unit $7,279 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit $7,279 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom $2,426 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed $2,426 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $18,197 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet $14,557 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $7,279 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet $6,066 Hotel / Motel - Per Room $9,705 Day Care - Per Student $3,033 Self -Storage - Per Unit $243 Service Station - Per Pump $60,655 Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 11 of 13 EXHIBIT "C" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS Vacant Laird as of Febmefy 2005 Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units Multi -Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5 then the future square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820 square feet. Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260 square feet. Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to be tabulated for each type of land use, the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/ Accessory Dwelling Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU Total Future EquhraAm t Dwelling Units (EDU) Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 12 of 13 Land Use Vacant Land as of February 2005 EDU by Land Use Future Equivalent Dwelling Units Single -Family Dwelling Unit 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363 Multi -Family Dwelling Unit 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149 Industrial Park(per 1,000 SF 15,659,820 SF 0.60 9,396 Commercial(per 1,000 SF 3,637,260 SF 1.50 51455 Total Future EDU 23,363 Total Cost of Projects $283,431,010 Total Future EDU as of February 2005 23,363 Cost per EDU $12,131 EDU by Use Fps Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU $12,131 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/ Accessory Dwelling Unit 0.6 EDU $7,279 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU $7,279 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU $2,426 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU $2,426 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU $18,197 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU $14,557 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU $7,279 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU $6,066 Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU $9,705 Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU $3,033 Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU $243 Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU $60,655 Resolution No. 2020-005 - Page 13 of 13