HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/11/16 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
November 16, 1994
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, Califorma 91730
City Councilmemben
Denni~ L. Stout, Mayor
Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tern
W'ffiiam J. Alexander, Councamember
Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember
Diane WilllAma, Councamember
Jack I ~m, City Mana~r
JAmes L Mark-man, City Attorney
Debra J. Ariams, C/ty
City Office: 989-1851
City Council Agenda
November 16, 1994
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the
meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
PAGE
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Buquet , Alexander , Stout ,
Williams , and Gutierrez
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation to the Etiwanda High School Marching Eagle
Regiment congratulating them for winning the Bands of America Western
Regional Championship competition.
Presentation of Proclamation to recognize Rancho Cucamonga's
Participatjon in the Buckle Up for Life Challenge for 1994/95.
Presentation of Proclamation to Jack Hill of Adelanto and Calvin Davis of
Playa Del Rey for their assistance in apprehending a hit and run driver.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council.
State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the
matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes
per individual.
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without
discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the
audience for discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: October 19, 1994
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/26/94 and 11/02/94 and Payroll
ending 10/20/94 for the total amount of $763,085.96.
Approval to file current investment Schedule as of October 31, 1994.
Approval of an application for Grant Funds from the Environmental
Enhancement and Mitigation Program for the Metrolink Railway Station
Beautification Project.
City Council Agenda
November 16, 1994
PAGE
,
o
RESOLUTION NO, 94-226
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION
PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION METRO PARK
Approval of the acquisition of approximately 2.4 acres in the amount of
$2,500,000.00 plus $10,000,00 for escrow fees, Account Number 16-50400,
for the right-of-way necessary for the modificatjon of the Interstate 15 and
Route 66 Interchange. (Continued from November 2, 1994)
Approval to execute a Joint Powers Agreement (CO 94-079) between the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California Department of
Transportation (State), (Agreement No. 8-721 ), for funding of the Interstate
15 and Route 66 Interchange Modification. (Continued from November 2,
1994)
Approval to authorize payment to Mathaudu Engineering for consulting
services on HVAC System at the Old Library Building, in the amount of
$1,000.00 to be paid for from Account No. 13-4563-6028.
Approval to review the policy regarding gifts and gratuiljes,
Approval of Parcel Map 12877 and Ordedng the Annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1
and 2, located on the north side of Hillside Road, east of Moonstone Avenue,
submitted by Irwin B. Golden.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-227
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 12877
RESOLUTION NO. 94-228
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING
THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 12877
City Council Agenda
November 16, 1994
10.
Approval to award and authorization for execution of Contract (CO 94-080)
for Bike Pathways, located at Terra Vista Parkway, Church Street, Fourth
Street, Arrow Route, Greenway Corridor, Etjwanda Avenue, Archibald
Avenue and Haven Avenue, to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated,
for the amount of $61,734.64 ($56,122.40 plus 10% contingency), to be
funded from Air Quality Improvement Grant Account No. 14-4158-6028.
11.
Approval to execute a renewal of the Agreement (CO 94-081) with the
County of San Bernardino for Weed Abatement Services.
12.
Approval to execute Lease Amendment (CO 92-064) between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball, Incorporated to allow for an
expansion of the stadium to be paid for by the tenant.
13.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13304
located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mt. View Drive,
submitted by Lewis Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-229
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13304
14.
Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14139
located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street
submitted by Ahmanson Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-230
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14139
15.
Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of
Completion for the 30 inch Water Line for Tract 13750, located on 24th
Street east of Wardman Bullock Road.
Release: Faithful Performance Bond
$ 92,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 94-231
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13750 - 30
INCH WATER LINE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF
A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
PAGE
16.
City Council Agenda
November 16, 1994
Approval to accept the Milliken Avenue Park Parking Lot Improvement
Project, Contract No. 94-033, as Complete, Release the Bonds and
Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and Approve the
Final Contract Amount of $191,413.26.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-232
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE
PARK PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
PAGE
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading,
Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will
be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk
will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion.
CONSfDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING LIMITATIONS
FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PURSUANT TO
THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
SECTION 33333.6
ORDINANCE NO. 537 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE Of THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING TIME LIMITATIONS FOR THE RANCHO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PURSUANT
TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND
SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as
required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-05 - CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to streamline the procedures for
review of single family residences in hillside areas.
City Council Agenda
November 16, 1994
PAGE
5
ORDINANCE NO. 538 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 94-05,
AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER
17.24, HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The
Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGER°S STAFF REPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the
Chair may open the meeting for public input.
No Items Submitted.
I. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion.
They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for
public input.
DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS RELATED TO AN ORDINANCE TO PREVENT
CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES
UPDATE ON ROUTE 30 SEQUENCING FROM SANBAG AND THE
CORRIDOR DESIGN AUTHORITY (Oral Report)
CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
OPPOSING THE REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (RCP) IN ITS
CURRENT FORM
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the
next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified
for the next meeting.
City Council Agenda
November 16, 1994
PAGE
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council.
State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the
matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes
per individual.
L. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that
a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 9, 1994,
seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500
Civic Center Drive.
October 19, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Reqular Meetincl
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, October 19, 1994, in the
Coundl Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Charles J. Buquet II.
Present were Coundlmembers: William J. Alexander, Chades J. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Willjams, and
Mayor Dennis L. Stout (7:41 p.m.).
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Rick Gomez, Community
Development Director; Karen Emery, Associate Park Planner; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson,
Principal Planner; Cindy Nords, Associate Planner; Cathy Morris, Planning Technician; Joe O'Neil, City
Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator; Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director;
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, library
Manager;, Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey,
Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner,
Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing the week of October 24 through 30, 1994 as "Red Ribbon
Week."
Mayor Pro Tem Buquet presented the proclamation to Deanna Bowers, school nurse for Central School
District, who was representing R.C. Casa.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
No communications were made from the public.
City Council Minutes
October 19, 1994
Page 2
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, announced there was a correction to Item D5, and that the attachments for Items D7
and D8 were reversed in the agenda package, and that corrected staff reports had been submitted to the
Council.
D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/28/94 and 10/5/94; and Payroll ending 9/22/94 for the total
amount of $2,001,115.21.
D2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of September 30, 1994.
D3. Approval to authorize staff to seek proposals for the preparation of the Conceptual Master Plan and
Phase I Construcljon Documents for the development of Northeast Community Park. Project to be funded by
Public Resource Grant and 1988 Bond Act Money. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR PRO
TEM BUQUET.
D4. Approval of the submittal of Household Hazardous Waste Discretionary Grant to the California
Integrated Waste Management Board.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-203
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCRETIONARY GRANT APPLICATION TO
THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF CHINO TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
DISCRETIONARY GRANT APPLICANT AND ADMINISTRATOR
D5.
Approval to extend Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-012R
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON
EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
D6. Approval to transfer equipment from the City to the County of San Bernardino.
D7. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 94-075) for Milliken Avenue Grade
Separation Slope and Drainage Modification, located on Milliken Avenue south of Jersey Boulevard at the
Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Railroad Tracks (Formerly AT & SF) to Sean Malek
Engineering and Construction for the amount of $88,737.00 ($80,670.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded
from Landscape Maintenance Distdct No. 3B, Account No. 464130-9324.
D8. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 94-076) for Salina Avenue Street
Improvements, between Calaveras Avenue and Sierra Madre Avenue and Vinmar Avenue, Street
Improvements to 350 feet north of Saline Avenue to Sean Malek Engineering and Construction for the amount
of $156,807.53 ($142,552.30 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from CDBG Funds, Account No. 28-4333-
9318.
City Council Minutes
October 19, 1994
Page 3
Dg. Approval and execution of Cooperalive Agreement (CO 94-077) State Agreement No. 8-924, between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the design and constru~on of Traffic Control
Signals and Safety Lighting on Route 30 at Hermosa Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-204
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, STATE AGREEMENT NO. 8-924 FOR THE DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING
ON ROUTE 30 AT HERMOSA AVENUE
D10. Approval to execute Usage Agreement (CO 94-078) between Chaffey Community College and the City
of Rancho Cucamonga for use of Recreational Fields at the College.
MOTION: Moved by G~errez, seconded by Alexander to approve the staff recommendations contained in the
staff reports of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent), with Gutjerrez
abstaining on the approval of the Investment Schedule.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM D3. Approval to authorize staff to seek proposals for the preparation of the
Conceptual Master Plan and Phase I Construction Documents for the development of Northeast
Community Park. Project to be funded by Public Resource Grant and 1988 Bond Act Money.
Mayor Pro Tem Buquet stated as pert of the Park and Recreation Subcommittee, he wanted to make everyone
aware of the hard work that has gone into this project and the length of time involved in getting this off the
ground. He also wanted to point out that the funding for this project was from the 1988 Public Resource Grant
and Bond Act Money, and this was an example of going out and finding other funding sources for a project.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Item D3. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1
(Stout absent).
No items were submitted.
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST CONSOLIDATED PLAN PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PURPOSE OF
OBTAINING PUBLIC INPUT REGARDING HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
An announcement was made in Spanish prior to the start of this item that translation services were available
if needed.
Mayor Pro Tem asked if anyone in the audience needed the translation service, which was also repeated in
Spanish. No response was made from the audience.
Staff report presented by Cindy Nords, Associate Planner.
City Council Minutes
October 19, 1994
Page 4
Mayor Pro Tem Buquet opened the meeting for public headng. A cerd~ed transcript of the public headng is on
file in the office of the City Clerk, and by reference is made a part of this record.
Mayor Stout arrived during the course of the public hearing at 7:41 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tem Buquet stated a second public hearing will be held in March on this topic.
MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander to accept staffs recommendation contained in the staff
report. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
A recess was called by Mayor Pro Tem Buquet at 8:33 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:53 p.m. with all
members of Council present.
F2. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE (Staff Requests This Item Be
Continued to December 7, 1994)
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue Item F2 to December 7, 1994. Motion carded
unanimously, 5-0.
No items were submitted.
No items were submitted.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
I1.
UPDATE REGARDING HR 1843
COUNCIL BUSINESS
(Continued from October 5, 1994)
Jack Lain, City Manager, recommended that no action be taken on this item as the legislation has died in
Congress.
No action was taken by Council.
City Council Minutes
October 19, 1994
Page 5
12. CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE ON
MEMBERSHIP SELECTION (Continued from October 5, 1994) (ORAL REPORT) Staff report presented
by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, who stated the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force held extensive
interviews and came up with the following recommendations for the final eight members and one alternate:
Robert Coberly
Lester Davies
Daniel Keesey
Karen Schmauss
John O'Neii
Hormuzd Sethna
Doris Beckher
Andrea Zeller
Peter Liu (alternate)
Coundlmember Gutierrez asked for clarification on how the approvals were to be made, if it would be for the
entire list or if they could make exceptions.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated the Task Force came up with nine recommendations,
but there were 31 applicants that the Council could chose from if that was their desire.
Councilmember Gutierrez inquired how could they do that when only the nine names were submitted.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated the names of the applicants had been submitted to the
Council previously.
Councilmember Williams asked who conducted the interviews.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director stated it was Councilmembers Buquet and Alexander, Gayle
Hinazumi and Jane Bradshaw from C-Car, and David Barker from the Planning Commission, with Larry McNiel
from the Planning Commission absent.
Councilmember Williams asked if the recommendations made tonight were the consensus of the entire
interviewing panel.
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated yes.
Councilmember Williams stated she would accept the proposed recommendation.
Councilmember Alexander stated it was not an easy decision to arrive at these names because of the many
applications they received.
Coundlmember Buquet added that they held many meetings to conduct the inten~iews to make sure that every
one had a chance.
Mayor Stout felt that possibly in the advertisements they should have referred to it as the Foothill Freeway
because he felt a lot of people did not know what Route 30 was.
Councilmember Buquet stated that was the name chosen by the City Council, and possibly they erred when
they chose that name. He felt this would be a 1-2 year process.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Gutierrez to accept the recommendations for membership. Motion
carried unanimously, 5-0.
City Council Minutes
October 19, 1994
Page 6
13. CONSIDERATION OF RESULTS OF COMMERCIAL SECURITY STUDY
Mayor Stout referred to the summary document and suggested the Council receive and file it for future
reference. He felt they had met most of the goals set out in the beginning and the study endorsed many of the
things they were already doing. He hoped there would be a constant attempt to consider public safety in the
design of everything.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet to receive and file the report, with express thanks for Duane Baker for his efforts
in preparing this summary,
Mayor Stout also wanted to point out that just because an issue is studied or a suggestion made did not mean
that was the direction the City should move in. He felt often a decision is made then a study is commissioned
to prove that decision. He stated in this case the idea was to obtain information and educate themselves so they
could make intelligent decisions without necessarily having to take immediate action. He felt this study would
help them to stay ahead of the criminal element.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to receive and file the report and instruct staff to utilize this
information in making future decisions. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0.
14.
REPORT ON NEW LIBRARY OPERATIONS (Oral Report)
Deborah Clark, Library Manager, stated they have now been in operation for 25 days since the grand opening
on September 24th. Since that time, 30,000 books have been in circulation, with an average of 1,200 books
loaned each day. She stated the children's program is having a tremendous response, and explained a few
of the programs they are offering and how the children's coordinator is working with the schools to get pdor
notification of assignments so that they will be able to provide the necessary matedal for the children. She
stated the public is getting used to the new technology, and they are also working through the problems they
have had with the telephone and voice mail system. She stated they have had 50 volunteers signed up for
service, with 25 of them already working. She stated they have had some complaints centering around not
enough parking, no place to sit and crowded aisles but these complaints are acceptable because they mean
they are being used. She stated one valid complaint is about the lack of media, but they have finally received
a shipment from the vendor and they are working to get them into circulation within the next week. They are
also in the process of trying to get the automatic check-out system activated. She stated they are also
developing a survey to give to the public to get their opinion on how to better serve them.
Jack Lam, City Manager, commended Deborah Clark for her energy and vision that she has brought to the
City's new library system.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
15. UPDATE ON AB 939
Mayor Stout asked about the second paragraph in the report where it stated 60 tons of green waste was being
diverted each, and then it did not state the time period.
Councilmember Alexander stated that was per month. He stated this was mostly an update to give them an
idea of where they were at in meeting their goals for 1995 and then 2000.
City Council Minutes
October 19, 1994
Page 7
Mayor Stout asked what percentage were they at right now.
Councilmember Alexander stated it was 15%.
Councilmember Willlares asked when apartment and commercial recycling will be on-line.
Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II, stated most of the multi-family dwellings will be on-line the first quarter
of 1995, though some were currently on-line. She stated they still needed to work on the commercial plan.
Councilmember Alexander stated some businesses were already recycling voluntarily.
Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, presented information on the education program and mascot
development, and presented posters and t-shirts to the Council.
ACTION: Report received and filed.
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K1.
John Van Doren, 11186 Corsica, thanked the Council fortheir openness and thought nothing occurred
in Rancho Cucamonga by accident. He felt everything was done to enhance the public's safety. He
stated he participated in the interview process for the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force and encouraged
the Council to consider the public's input as well as that of the Task Force. He wanted to be sure the
freeway met the needs of the businesses and residents of the community.
L. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0. The
meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jan Sutton
Deputy City Clerk
Approved:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: i0-26-94 (94/95)
RUN DATE: 10/26/94 PAGE: 1
VENDOR NAHE ITEM OESCRXPTION NARR NO NARRo AMT.
· $ CHECKI OVERLAP
12840 JOHNSTON~ LAUREN RECREATION REFUND 90315~ 55.00-
((( 90316 - 90420
8106 TRI CHAPTER (CALBO) SEmINAR-UNIFORM BLOG CODE 90421~ 95o00-
<(< 90422 - 90959 )))
3344 SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION ReHA8 PROGRAM 90960~ 18495.00-
((( 90961 - q~n09 )))
3344 SUNRISe CONSIRUCTIQN ReHAB PROGRAM 91010e 1~495.00
((( 91011 - 91012 )>)
336~ 8~ AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICe SUPPLIES ~ 91013 22qo79
I A L A eQUIPMeNT RENTALS CO.s INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES I 91014 418.81
962 A T L T MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS 91015 0.65
6373 A-CO SANITATION E~UIPMENT RENTAL 91016 79.28
4347 ACCURATe SMOGs AUTOs TRUCK & VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES t 91017 119.94
3785 ACTION ART ReCReATION SUPPLIES 91018 181.02
1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS e 91019 629.73
1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR C~LLULAR PHONE BILLINGS I 91020 272.23
6695 ALBERTSONS REFRESHHENTS FOR EAP MEETING 91021 34097
· 337 ALPAX OFFICe EQUIPMENT I 91022
1135 ALIGNMENT & 8RAKE SPECZALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 91023 118o00
26~4 ALPERT'S PRINTING OFFICE SUPPLIES 91024 48.55
3778 ALPERTw HELANIe INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91025 364.50
6686 A~ERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION SUBSCRIPTION 91026 12.00
6687 APFEL, ROBIN SeTTLeMENT OF CLAIM 91027 310.00
2411 ARAGONs SALLY INSTRUCTOR PAYHENT 91028 496.80
2299 ARRON TRAILER SUPPLIES HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91029 36°53
6688 ASSEMBLY PUBLICATIONS OFFICE SUPPL[ES 91030 21.56
26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 91031 4,803075
2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY9 XNC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 91032 755.59
~02 AUTO RESTORATORS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 91033 66,78
1061 A~ARDS BY CHAMPION ENGRAVED PLAQUE $ 91034 471.95
6689 8.C. TRUCKING BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 91035 13.40
3667 ~ALOGHt JULIANNA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91036 198.00
841 BANK OF AMeRICA-CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION FEES 91037 3,969.53
6890 BARRON'S SUBSCRIPT[ON 91038 129o00
555 BENEFIELD, KINGSLEY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91039 188.10
4153 BOAHAHs CAPTORIA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91040 99°00
6691 BOLOA. LAUREN RECREATION REFUND 91041 21o50
1081 BOLIN MAINT. ~ JANXTORZALs JOHN JANITORiAL SERVICES I 91042 17,265.00
6692 800KHOUSE. THE OFFICE SUPPLIES 91043 11o80
142 BRADFORDs HAROLD INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91044 155010
1166 BRUNSWICK ~EER CREEK LANES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91045 525.00
552 UURK-BLACKSC~LEGER, ROSEANN ZNSTRUCTOR PMT 91046 2.912,25
2440 BURRUSOe LISA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91047 39.60
39~2 CAL MESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE e 91048 100.00
~81 CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN MEDICAL PREMIUM 91049 249266.16
3622 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY PAYMENT 91050 200.00
3118 CHINO HILLS TRANSMISSION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 91051 4e190.63
73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO. INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 91052 626.88
6693 CITY ADVERTISING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 91053 600.00
949 CLARKe KAREN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 9i054 126.12
6696 CLOUT CLOUT BREAKFAST MEETING 91055 8~.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 10-26-94 (94/95)
RUN DATE: 10126194 PAGE: 2
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARRe ANTe
I, CHECKI OVERLAP
2668 COBB GROUP INC., THE SUBSCRIPTION RENENAL 91056 39.00
2670 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91057 106.16
4330 COMPUTER NARKETPLACE COMPUTER SUPPLIES 91058 1,253.85
130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES I 91059 3m665o00
4316 CORPORATE EXPRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 91060 I41.28
((( 91061 - 91063 >))
85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS t 91064 200752,8o
3331 CUNERTY, ANNA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91065 567°60
2512 D.A.R.E. AMERICA D.A,R.E. MATERIAL 91066 109.31
284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES I 91067 311.6I
2678 DAPPER TIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 91068 13.96
6366 DENCO OFFICE SUPPLIES 91069 57.53
839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 91070 230.03
6380 DUNLAP L ASSOCIATESe VAIL OFFICE SUPPLIES 91071 181.48
523 EASTMAN, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES I 91012 163.86
3606 ECOFF, JILL EMPLOYEE/CONMUTER OF THE MONTH 91073 1,200,00
659 EGGMEAD SOFTNAME OFFICE SUPPLIES/E~UIPMENT I 91014 1,496,60
3171 FEJERAN, TIMOTHY C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE 91075 187.50
155 FILARSKY ~ WATT MONTHLY SERVICES 91016 187.50
6696 FONTANA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOC. REFUND MAINT. SVC. EXPENSES I 91011 1m191.46
2840 FORO OF UPLAND, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 91018 31.97
98 FORD PRINTING ~ NAILINGt INC MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS I 91019 1,152.98
6215 FOUR STAR LIGHTING INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91080 319.48
1082 FRANKLIN ~UEST CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES 91081 556°26
3356 GARCIAe VIVIAN REIMBURSE FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES 91082 22,96
3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 91083 180.00
6386 GREGORY, CHERI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91086 152,00
137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS I 91085 2,105.26
166 HAINES ~ COMPANYe INC. 12 MONIH LEASE SERVICE 91086 116.12
662 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. E~UIPMENT MAINTENANCE 91081 216.91
3336 HEILIG, KELLY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91088 853,56
2069 HEYDEe DONALD L- INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT t 91089 468.96
958 MIGGINSm NARTI CERT SUPPLIES 91090 35.51
6387 HOLMANt BARBARA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91091 116.00
1234 HOSEMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 91092 152.89
161 HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8 91093 19.77
2~12 HOYT, RAYMDNO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91096 2,915.70
3636 HUNT, LUANNE INSTRUCTOR PMT 91095 569000
695 HYDRO-SCAPE PROOUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 91096 461.12
66 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91091 66.29
165 INGRAM PAPER PAPER SUPPLIES 91098 38.96
2315 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91099 28.55
612 JAESCHKE TNC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 91100 118,69
6087 JOHNSON, JEFF ENTERTAINMENT 91101 128.00
179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN MEOICAL INSURANCE 9~02 26,2~0.56
6191 KALAUSEKt STACY INSTRUCTOR PMT 91103 28.80
1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 91104 398,13
172 KOZLOVICHt OEB~lE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91105 le522.50
12886 LA JOLLA FOOD ~ BEVERAGE CO. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 91106 l~.lT
195 LANCE, SOIL ~ LUNGHARD AUOIT SERVICES 91107 16,942.15
3957 'iRE CRAFT RECREAIlON SUPPLIES 91108 136.65
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONbA
LIST OF NARRANTS
FOR PERIO0:10-26-94 C94/95)
RUN DATE: 10/26/94 PAGE: 3
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARR. ANT.
** CHECKI OVERLAP
2864 LIGHTNING POWDER CO.m INC. PORTABLE SEMI-INKLESS KIT 91109 32.18
4382 LITHOCRAFT PRINTERS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91110 819o03
1372 LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE PLAYSCHOOL SUPPLIES I 91111 10311.08
~118 LONCAR, PHIL C.EoR.1. INSTRUCTOR 91112 250.00
3668 LDWE, JAMES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91113 294°00
600 LYNCH, JANIE RECREAIION SUPPLIES 91116 33.06
956 MAC DONALD, IAIN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91115 388°50
72 MARK CHRIS, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91116 23.33
76 MARKMANtARCZTNSKIeHANSQNm~ KING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 91117 8,005,61
250 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE TOWING SERVICES 91118 65.00
2555 MC ALLISTER DESIGN DESIGN OF BUSINESS CAROS 91119 21.55
3015 MC CALL, SUSAN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91120 42.60
12883 MERCER PRODUCTS CO,t INC, BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 91121 66,00
2198 MICHAEL°S CRAFTS RECREATION SUPPLIES I 91122 57005
3057 MILLS, MARY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91123 112o50
3960 MOLONEY, JIM INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91124 386°00
403 MORTON COATINGS, INC, - BAUER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 91125 2,622.23
3333 HOTTe SYLVIA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91126 162o00
2266 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 91121 459.61
3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES # 91128 826.56
3693 NATIONWIDE MOBILE HOME REHAB. PROGRAM 91129 2,016,50
4034 NICHOLS, FRED INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91130 1,239.00
12885 NOBLE HOUSE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 91131 54.32
527 OLYMPIC STUDIOSt INCo INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91132 2,530.27
3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91133 998°40
563 OSTERBAUER COMPRESSOR SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91134 116.23
235 OMEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 91135 956.86
6223 PAPER DIRECT, INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES t 91136 18.15
818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC, CONCREIE SUPPLIES 91137 21.55
3716 PARMA MEMBERSHIP RENEMAL 91138 50.00
487 PATTON SALES CORP. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91139 89°83
751 PEP BOYS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 91140 84.43
1019 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA PHOTO SUPPLIES # 91141 65°54
562 PIP PRINTING RECREATION SUPPLIES # 91162 480,03
255 PONA DISTRIGUTING CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 6 SUPPLIES 91143 7,130.10
1069 POMONA VALLEY KANASAKI VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91146 138.05
2119 PONCHAUO, JANICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91145 86°40
1316 PRECZNT REPORTER AOVERTISEMENT 91166 255.36
6292 PRICE CLUB RECREATION SUPPLIES 91147 64,63
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 91148 350.03
<<( 91149 - 91169 )>)
251 R & R AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAINTmSUPPLIES~SERVICE I 91150 2e319.87
IBgO'R ~ R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPL%ES # 91151 196.73
~025 R J SUPPLY CO, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91152 84.45
418 R M A GROUP SUIL TESTING SERVICES I 91153 1,568,00
2105 ReH,F., INC. VEHICLE MAINT SERVICEESUPPL[ES 91156 53.00
2600 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT PLAN CHECK SERVICES 91155 265,00
2bO0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT PLAN C,ECK SERVICES 91156 890.00
ZO7 RANCHO HINI STORAGE MINI STORAGE # 91157 150,00
8110 RANCHO PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAYSCHOOL REFUND # 91158 1,000,00
~383 RATHFONt LINDA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91159 54.00
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST DF WARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 10-26-96 C96/95)
RUN DATE: 101Z6/96 PAGE:
VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARRo ANT.
· ~ CMECKI OVERLAP
ZOZ3 RESPONSE ENVELOPE OFFICE SUPPLIES I 91160 365°05
6140 ROAD MACHINERY. INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES i 91161 16tZ93o41
626 ROBLESe RAUL P-e SRo TIRE REPAIR I 91162 153o94
8171 RDYA'S COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES REFUND CLASS 91163 [6o71
8169 RPH DEVELOPMENT REFUND CLASS 91166 300.00
8172 S.V. TRANSPORTATION REFUND DEPOSIT 91165 13o00
3958 SALVIATIt MARTHA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT I 91166 861.00
~66 SAN BERN CO AGRICULTURE DEPT. HEED ABATEMENT SERVICES 91167 Z32.06
666 SAN BERN CO AGRICULTURE OEPT. WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES 91168 191.52
1238 SAN BERN CO LIBRARY OCTOBER SHREDDING 91169 2SeO00oO0
303 SAN UERNARDINO COUNTY ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 9IlTO 9.10
132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COe INC MAINT SUPPLIES I 9117% 652°97
3067 SAUL~ SANDY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91172 596.00
6128 SCHNARZE INOUSTRIESe INC. VEHICLE SUPPLIES I 91%73 91o30
535 SEMPLE, JUDY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91116 129o60
20il SETCON MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91175 91o83
4388 SHEELERe DEBORAH INSTRUCTIOR PAYMENT 91176 15.00
2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES I 91171 2w626,75
6313 SKATE EXPRESS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91178 512.00
((( 91179 - 91189 )))
1632 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS t 91190 13e118.74
4192 SPAINmJRtWiLLIAM V, C.E.R.T. INSTRUCTOR I 91191 362,50
322 SPARRLETTS MONTHLY SERVICE 91192 31.00
750 SPECIALTY TYPEWRITER SERVICE TYPENRITER SERVICE 91193 39°00
4369 STEHNt JIM INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91196 36.00
33~ SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION REHA8 PROGRAM 91195 895,00
836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS NAINT SUPPLIES I 91196 3e106.91
3733 TOM WORLD CONVERSIQNSe LTD. VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES/SERVICE t 91191 353.56
llSI TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 91198 265.00
2718 TERRY, DONNA iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91199 Z61,O0
3897 THORNTONw GRANT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 9IZO0 I8o00
~316 TORRESe LAURA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91201
3618 TROXELL COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY VIDEO MONITOR 91202 33.19
~390 TURNERr DENISE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91203 105.00
693 U,S.tHHITE VAN BATTERY CO,m INC, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91206 261o86
2958 UNPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMP SERVICES I 91205 3m295o50
8113 UNITED FIELD SERVICES REFUND DEPOSIT 91206 25.00
3~22 VIKING OFFICE PROOUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES # 91207 16.19
667 VISA VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS I 91208 549.3Z
q326 HASTE ENVRNMNT°L SVCS L TRANSPORT WASTE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 91209 45.00
41NO MATKINS~ DAN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91210 105o00
213 HAXZEt KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES 91211 I38.56
lg~l WESTERN TURF ~ COMMERCIAL MAINT SUPPLIES 91212 125,12
872 WITTERe JOANNE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 91213
~372 WDODCOCKf ALEXANORA MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 91216 5.04
2166 WORLAND~ CHRIS RECREATION REFUNDS 91215 31.59
675 HYNN'S FROSTEMP/MAXAIR VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES I 91216 613.7V
TOTAL 265,596.00
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
LiST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-02-96 (94195)
RUN DATE: 11/02/96 PAGE:
VENDO· NAME [TEN DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARRo ANT.
6626 FLORES, ROBERT
&Ol6 GRANTe RITA
1135 ALIGNMENT L ERAKE SPECIALISTS
3897 THORNTON, GRANT
3366 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS
I A L A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO., INC.
tO A L R TiRE SERVICE
2732 ARC LOCKSMITHS
6367 ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK C
6401 ALTAIR GASES AND EQUIPMENT, iNC.
1~30 AHERZCAN BUSINESS FORMS
6697 ANDERSON POOL C SPA
2616 AUTO PARTS CORPANYe iNC
6229 BACICH, PATRICK
6393 8ROMNELLS, INC.
4359 BRUEL g KJAER SERVICE
56 C P CONSTRUCTION
4381 CALICO GRAPHICS
i223 CALIFORNIA SENSO· CORPORATION
3]23 CAROKEY SYSTEMS, XNC
68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SE·VICE
3t18 CHZNO HILLS TRANSNESSXON
73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, iNC.
76 CiTY RENTALS
3879 CODE, LXNOA
2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY
6330 COMPUTER MARKETPLACE
643 COMPUTERLAND
6316 CORPORATE EXPRESS
6399 COVEL, DON
6169 CROMN TROPHIES C MEDALS
85 CUCAMONGA CO MATER DZST
239 0 g K CONCRETE CO
355 DANgELS TZRE SERVICE
2478 DAPPER TXRE
367 DAY-TiMERS,
60 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CAL[F
6366 DENCO
902 DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
tOT DETCO
3816 EASTLAND CONSTRUCTZONe iNC.
523 EASTMAN, INC
2556 EBERHART C STONE, INC.
459 EGGHEAD SOFTMARE
6626 FLORES, ROBERT
RECREATXON REFUN0
(((
iNSTRUCTOR PNT
(((
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
(((
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLXES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT SERVICE L REPAIR
DEPOSIT REFUND
SUPPLIES
OFFICE/MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE RAXNTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYRENT
VEHICLE NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
CONPUTER SUPPLIES
COMPUTER MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLiES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RECREATION SUPPLIES
((< 91268
MONTHLY MATER BILLINGS
STREET MAINTENANCE
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ SUPPLIES
VEHICLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLiES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DENTAL INSURANCE
OFFICE SUPPLXES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PROGRESS ESTIMATE
<<< 91262
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLZES/EQUIPNENT
RECREATION REFUND
d.4, CHECKi OVERLAP
90279a, 2S.00-
90260- 909,00 >))
909018 26Z.SO-
9090Z- 91022
91023e 118.00-
91026- 91199
9ZzOOe 11.00-
91201- 91220
m 91221 262.91
91222 69.83
e 91223 956.31
I 91226 1,191o16
I 91225 :59.97
91 226 12.93
I 91227 S00.11
91228 63.76
I 91229 316.72
91230 350.00
91231 36011
A 91232 906.22
91233 leOOOoOO
91234 215.82
I 91235 11,620.09
e 91236 9.863.05
91237
91238 886.86
I 91239 309.67
iP 91240 104.55
91261 lO.O0
I 91242 113.01
91243 186.03
91244 TRO.Oo
91245 158.33
91246 300°00
91 247 190S0
91251
91252 56,513.ZZ
91253 2,069.95
91254 T08.60
91 ZS5 1,112.73
91256 20.45
91 257 18,120.00
91 258 29.62
91259 688.63
91260 251.60
'~1 201 ,~5.7OZ.l S
91262
91263 1,399.00
91266 615o00
91265 Z0005°69
91266 55.00
CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
LiST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIO0:13-02-94 (941953
RUN DATE: li/OilO~ PAGE: Z
VENDOR NaNE iTEH DESCRIPTION MARR NO MARR. ANTe
o, CHECK/~vFqLAP
2840 FORD OF UPLAND, iNC. VEHICLE NAINTENANCE I 91267
98 FORO PRINTING ~ NAILING, INC NA[NTENANCE ~ OPERATIONS I 91Z68 506.96
I062 FRANKLin QUEST CO, OFFICE SUPPLIES I 9i269 316.08
3621 GARRISON FOOTHILL NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 91270 93.07
6698 GOLDEN, IRNXN DR. GEOLOGIC STUOY REFUND 91211 /SeOO
4014 GRANT, RITA iNSTRUCTOR PNT 91ZTZ Z6Z,50
766 GREAT NESTERN SAVINGS OEFERREO CONP 91273
13T GTE CALIFORNia HONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS I 91276 XeI39eNZ
4038 HARTZQG & CRABXLLe INCe PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 91275 8,360.00
462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. EQUXPHENT HAZNTENANCE 91276 XZ4./Z
4361 HENBERGER CO.INC., JOHN C. NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 91277 1,497,73
1236 HOSENAN NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91278 121.76
i6I HOYT LUReEl CO., S.H. HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 91279 210o5T
1866 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 9i280 92.90
4230 HUFCDR AIR MALL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91281
12886 HUTCHZSON PROPERTY REFUND DEPOSIT 9i282 500,00
103 I C N A RETZRENENT TRUST-6ST DEFERRED COHP 91283
46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 91286 1,018.93
45 [NLAND FACTORS HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 9iZRS 28.19
12842 iNLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM DUES 91286
ISS8 XNTERNAT'L RIGHT OF NAY ASSQC. NENOERSHIP OUES 9128T
168 iNTERNATiONAL CONF BLOC OFFiCiAL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91288 1e923.97
2066 iNTERNATIONAL E-Z UPe XNC. RECREATEON SUPPLIES 91289
4065 iVESe JZN - THE SUOLZNINALS RECREATION SERVICES 91290
1218 KNOX NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 91291
12887 LAD CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT REFUND 9i292
193 LAIRO CONSTRUCTION CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 91293 346.13
849 LANSON PRODUCTS, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 91294 386.23
3156 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE, INC. OIL ANALYSIS 91295 S2.60
12888 MODERN HOUSEhARES iNC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 9Z296 15.00
1228 N R P A-PACiFIC REGIONAL OFFICE NRPA NEETING REGISTRATION 91297 560.00
4281 NAISH, PAT ENTERTAINRENT 91298 350.00
2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE 91299 6.96
3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES I 91300 411.13
433 NiXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 91301 lZl.OZ
3566 NURSERYLAND LANOSCAPE SUPPLIES 9i30Z 32.30
3049 ONTARIO FIRE EXTiNGUiSHER CO. PXRE EXTiNGUiSHER SERVICES I 91303 361.00
235 OMEN ELECTRIC HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 91306 T95eOO
2921 PeA.P.A. PESTXCXDE APPLXCATORS SENINAR 92305 55e00
2921 P.A.P.A. PESTXCZDE APPLXCATORS SENXNAR 91306 45.00
1823 PAGENET PAGING SERVICE 91307 34.20
311 PXCONE PLUNDZNG CORPORATION PLUNBXNG REPAIR ~ SUPPLIES I 91308 6iS.IX
791 PHI/OELTA CARE MEOZCAL iNSURANCE 91309 el9,oO
2961 PORCU, DANIEL RECREATZONfENTERTAINNENT 91310 ZZS.O0
4292 PRICE CLUe RECREATION SUPPLIES 91311 80.26
8031 PRICE COSTCO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 91312 211.00
3286 PRiNCiPAL MUTUAL MEOICALtDZSAOZLITY iNSURANCE 91313 63,2Z0.08
8174 PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE REFUND DEPOSIT 91314 48000
65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES B 91315 402,43
Z0T RANCHO Minx STORAGE MINX STORAGE e 91316 750.00
1165 RICHARDSON AUTO BODY, ZNC, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 91311 103.06
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LIST OF MARRANTS
FOR PERIOD: 11-02-94 (94/95)
RUN DATE: 11102t94 PAGEI 3
VENDOR NAME ITEN DESCRIPTION MARR NO NARR. ANT.
276 R[VERSIOE BLUEPRINT
4257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
425T RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
626 ROBLESt RAUL
4142 ROYAL PIPE L SUPPLY
2064 SAFECO LIFE INS. CO, GROUP AOMIN.
1236 SAN BERN CO LIBRARY
571 SAN BERN CO OFFICE OF MNGNNT SVC
571 SAN BERN CO OFFICE OF MNGMNT SVC
30I SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS
13Z SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC
535 SENPLE, JUDY
9175 SHUNKNZLER, ROSE
2507 SZEBE ENVIRONNENTAL CONTROLS
1327 SNART E FINAL
135 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEOeINC
987 SOUTM COAST A Q 14 D
1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EOISON
646 STANDARO INSURANCE CO.
646 STANDARD INSURANCE CO.
284T STATE ENVZRONMENTAL MGMT., ZNC,
3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3344 SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION
836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS
4400 TELE-MORKSt ZNC.
693 U.S./WNITE VAN BATTERY CO.m INC.
2T31 UNIGLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL
489 UPLAND, CITY OF
4158 VAUGHAN'S SNIRTZ
667 VISA
499 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA)
213 MAXIEe KLEEN-LINE CORP
1941 hIESTERN TURF ~ COMMERCIAL
345 NHITNEY MACHINERY
509 XEROX CORPORATION
202I YORK INDUSTRIES
371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
PRINTS
PROGRESS ESTIMATE
PROGRESS ESTIMATE
TIRE REPAIR
MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
MEDICAL INSURANCE
OCTOBER SHREODING
TELEPRDCESSING SERVICES
TELEPROCESSING SERVICES
CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE
MAINT SUPPLIES
INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT
REFUND DEPOSIT
SERVICE/SUPPLIES
DAY CAMP SUPPLIES
REGISTRATION
STORAGE TANK
MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS
INSURANCE PREMIUM
INSURANCE PREMIUM
SERVICE ANO SUPPL[ES
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
REHA8 PROGRAM
NAINT SUPPLIES
DOWN PAYHENT-hiE-LINE ACIS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
CONDEX NEETING
NONTMLY hiATER BILLING
OoA.RoEo T-SHIRTS
VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS
MONTHLY VISION SERVICE 8ILLING
MAINT SUPPLIES
MAINT SUPPLIES
MAINT SUPPLIES
COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE
GRAFFITI REMOVER
RECREAIION SUPPLIES
CHECKI OVERLAP
91318 139.43
t 91319 1,10T,554,08
e 91320 199,997,44
I 91321 167.50
91322 49.20
91323 51.56
91324 TT.O0
91325 302.00
91326 302.00
I 91321 666e812.00
91 328 200.42
91 329 114.00
91330 30.00
91331 431.50
91332 35.92
# 91333 15.00
t 91334 233.80
t 91335 12,696.59
91336 615.50
91331 101.50
91338 14,016o64
9133Y 2,669.00
91340 1,984.00
I 91~1 566.41
91342 6,330.00
91343 34.15
~ 91344 5~0.00
# 91345 190.64
91366 9,374.24
· 91341 535.60
91348 6,201.54
a 91349 2,439.90
91350 166.21
91351 33.62
e 91352 3,199.t2
· 91353 7Y.89
91354 66.43
,, TOTAL
Z,4Z4,S/9.ZO
11/07/1994
CITY OF RANGHO CUCAMONGA
PORTFOLIO MASTER SU)~ARY
OCTOBER 31, 1994
CITY
CASH
AVEEAGE ---YIELD TO MATURITY---
PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365
INVESTMENTS BOOK VALUE PORTFOLIO TERN MATUI{ITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALEnt
Certificates of Deposit - Bank ...............$ 12,419,566.50 29.22 336 122 3.703 3.754
L~al Agency Investment Funds ................ $ 12,346,754.29 29.05 i 1 5.036 5 106
Bankers Acceptances ..........................$ 4 879 930.56 11.48 182 24 4.867 4'934
Federal Agency Issues - Coupon ...............$ 5'496'250.00 12.93 628 446 5 620 5'698
Treasury Securities - Coupon .................$ '482'996.24 I 14 774 628 5'766 5'846
Treasury Securities - Discount ...............$ 3 350'881.16 7:88 358 190 4'828 4'896
Mortgage Backed Securities ...................$ 1'920'016.79 4 52 1 673 934 6'768 6'862
Small Business Administration ................$ 1'101:562.50 2:59 9'131 6 110 8'184 8'298
Miscellaneous Securities - Discount ..........$ '501 904.00 1.18 10'048 7'227 8'315 8'430
Passbook/Checking Accounts ...................$ 708,719.03
(not included in yield calculations) 1.973 2.000
Accrued Interest at Purchase .................$ 63,750.02
TOTAL CASH and P~RCHASE INTEP, EST .............$ 772,469.05 .......................................
TOTAL CASB and INVESTMENTS .................$ 43,272,331.09
NO{fIR ENDING FISCAL
TOTAL EARNINGS O~TOBER 31 YEAR TO DATE
CurTent Year $ 186,494.65 $ 756,322.78
DATE
I certify that this report accurately reflects all agency pooled investments and
is in comformity with investment policy adopted July 20, 1994. A ~opy of this
investment policy is available in the Finance Division of the Administrative
Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient
cash flow liquidity to m~t next month's esti~ted expenditures.
8
INVESTNENT P~Z~3E STATED ---YTN--- ~ATURITY DAYS
NUMBER ISSUER DATE Ba~ VALUE FACE VAM~ NARKET VALUE ~TE 360 365 DATE I~ ~T
CEFHFIC. ATES OF DEPOdHT ' BARB<
00913 BAWl< OF AMERICA 09/27/94 1,791,645.50 1,791,645.50 1,791,645.50 2.700 2.700 2.738 11/29/94 28
(N)914 BANK OF AMIH{ICA 10/27/94 127,921.00 127,921.00 127,921.00 2.800 2.800 2.839 11/28/94 27
00888 FO(YrHILL INDEP BAI{K 03/15/94 500,000.00 5(M),O00.O0 500,000.00 4.430 4.430 4.492 03/15/95 134
00871 ~T WESTERN 11/08/93 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.600 3.600 3.650 11/08/94 7
00872 GREAT WESTERN 11/15/93 500,000.00 500,000.00 5430,000.00 3.600 3.600 3.650 11/15/94 14
00882 GREAT WESTERN 01/25/94 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 3.350 3.350 3.397 O1/25/95 85
00884 GREAT WESTEIU! 02/15/94 500,0OO.00 500,0OO.00 500,000.00 3.750 3.750 3.802 O2/15/95 106
00885 G~T WESTERN 02/22/94 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 3.750 3.750 3.802 02/22/95 113
0~86 GI~EAT WESTERN 03/01/94 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,0OO.00 3.750 3.750 3.802 03/O1/95 120
0(~91 GREAT WESTERN 03/29/94 500,0OO.00 500,0OO.00 500,0OO.00 3.750 3.750 3.802 03/29/95 148
00898 GREAT WESTERN 05/12/94 2,0OO,0OO.O0 2,0OO,0OO.00 2,000,000.00 4.600 4.600 4.664 08/14/95 286
00877 SANWA 01/04/94 1,000,0OO.00 1,0OO,0OO.00 1,0OO,000.00 3.150 3.150 3.194 02/08/95 99
00878 S~A 01/04/94 1,000,000.00 1,OOO,OOO.OO 1,0OO,0OO.00 3.150 3.150 3.194 01/O4/95 64
00894 SAlrWA 04/29/94 2,000,0OO.00 2,0OO,0OO.00 2,0OO,000.00 4.250 4.250 4.309 05/02/95 182
SUBTO TMwS ~ AVERAGES
12,419,~6.50 12,419,566.50 12,419,~.50 3.703 3.754 122
"'~LAGENCY ~TMENT FUNDS
5 LOCAl, AGENCY INVST FUND
..~04 ~ AGENCY INVST FUND
11,233,754.29 i1,233,754.29 11,233,754.29 5.106 5.036 5.108 1
1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 5.1~ 5.036 5.106 1
SUB'INDTM~ an<{ AVEPAGES
12,346,754.29 12,346,754.29 12,346,754.29 5.036 5.106
BANKERS ACCEPTANCES
00902 DAI ICHI F~ANGYO BANK NY
05/27/94 4,879,930.56 5,000,000.00 4,879,930.56 4.867 4.867 4.934 11/25/94 24
FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON
00895 FEDERAL FAIU4 CREDIT BANKS
00896 [ED[.RAJ~ FAIU{ CREDIT BANKS
00897 FEDEP. A.L FARM CREDIT BANKS
04/29/94 2,000,0(0).00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.850 5.770 5.850 04/29/96 545
05/~/94 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5.160 5.089 5.1~ 05/01/95 181
05/05/94 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 5.850 5.870 5.952 04/29/~ 545
SUBTOTALS and AVEPAGES
5,496,250.00 5,5(N),00).00 5,4~,250.00 5.620 5.698 446
TREASURY SECq3RITIES - t'~3UK)N
009<)3 ~ OF AMERICA
00904 BAffi< OF AMERICA
06/08/94 272,845.00 277,000.00 272,845.00 6.141 6.571 6.662 08/31/97 1,034
06/07/94 210,151.24 217,000.00 210,151.24 4.600 4.720 4.786 02/~/95 100
SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES
482,996.24 494,000.00 482,996.24 5.766 5.846 628
TREASURY SECq3RITIES - DISCOUNT
00892 BA~{K OF AM~RIa
00907 BaNK OF MICA
04/13/94 1,913,085.56 2,000,000.00 1,913,085.56 4.370 4.518 4.5al 04/06/95 156
~/30/94 1,437,795.60 1,515,000.00 1,437,795.60 5.040 5.241 5.314 08/24/95 235
~UBTO TiU.,~ a.nd AVEPAGES
3,350,881.16 3,515,000.00 3,350,881.16 4.828 4.896 190
9
11/07/1994 CITY OF RAM(~ CUCAKE~ I~ - 3
INVESTMENT PORT~LIO DETAILS - INVES~ CITY
O~ER 31, 1994 CASH
INVESTMENT PURCHASE STATED ---YTM--- MATUHTY DAYS
NUMBER ISSUER DATE BO0~ VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT
MORTGAGE BACKjR) SECURITIES
00071 BARK OF AMERICA 02/23/87 78,969.33 81,073.64 442,907.10 8.000 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 2,620
00203 Bad[{ OF AB~ERIC. A 09/21/87 167,106.79 180,900.45 612,753.80 8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,785
00899 BAlK OF AMERICA 05/12/94 1,485,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,485,000.00 3.790 6.136 6.221 02/24/95 117
00(09 DEAN WITTEl{ REYNOLDS 07/01/87 35,761.84 35,05~.59 84,710.58 9.000 8.515 8.634 03/15/01 2,328
00002 GIBRALTAR SAVI]Wd 07/01/87 153,178.83 155,314.40 663,389.28 8.500 8.631 8.751 05/15/01 2,389
SUFI'OTALS an<{ AVEPAGES
1,920,016.79 1,952,345.~ 3,268,760.76 6.768 6.862 934
S)[AIj, B[]SII~,SS AI3eelNISTRATIO{{
00004 SMALL BUSINESS A/3MIN
07/25/86 1,101,562.50 1,000,000.00 1,~5,142.39 9.125 8.184 8.298 07/~/11 6,110
MISCEI3.~INI~OUS SECURITIES - DIS4X)UNT
00072 BAIB{OF A)UKRICA
02/10/87 501,904.00 5,200,000.00 404,872.00 8.430 8.315 8.430 08/15/14 7,227
T{3~TAL INVESTMENTS and AVEP, AG~
$ 42,499,862.04 47,427,665.87 43,735,153.90 4.893% 4.961% 404
10
11/07/1994 CITY OF ~ CUCAMONGA PM - 4
I~ES~ENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - ~ CITY
OCKBE~ 31, 1994 CASH
I'Fv'ES~ENT PURCHASE STATED --- Y'I"M --- MATU1QITY DAYS
{El{ I~UEI{ DATE BO(){< VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT
CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOOWIS
00180 BANK OF AMERICA
708,719.03 2.000 1.973 2.000
Accrued Interest at Purchase
63,750.02
TOTAL CASH
$ 772,469.05
TOTAL CASH and INVESTMENTS
$ 43,272,331.09
11
11/07/1994 CITY OF P~(~O ~ P~ - 5
PORTFOLIO N~TER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE CITY
OCTOBER 1, 1994 ' OCrOBER 31, 1994 CASH
STATED TRANSACTION I~ES SALES/MATURITIES
TYPE INVESTMElT # ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR NITBDRAMALS BALANCE
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOkSlT ' BMfi< BEGINNING BALAIWCE: 14,619,566.50
00912 BANK OF AMERICA 2.800 10/27/1994 127,921.00
00914 B~NK OF ~ERI~ 2.800 10/27/1994 127,921.00
00881 GREAT WESTERN 3.2.50 10/17/1994 1,700,000.00
00883 GREAT WESTERN 3.2.500 10/31/1994 500,000.00
S~AI.~ and ENDING BALANCE 127,921.00 2,327,921.00 12,419,566..50
LOCA. L AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS
O0<K)5 LOCJ~L AGENCY INVST FUND
000804 LOOd~ AGEI~;'Y INVST FUND
SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE
5.106 1,761,457.13
5.106
1,761,457.13
BEGINNING BALANCE:
10,585,297.16
12,346,754.29
CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
00180 BANK OF AMERICA
2.000 1,872,000.00
BEGINNING BALANCE:
1,656,000.00
492,719.03
708,719.03
{ A~EI:'T~CES
BEGINNING
4,879,930.56
4,879,930.56
FEDERAl, AGENCY ISSUES
BEGINNING BAIJ~NGE:
5,496,250.00
5,496,2.50.00
TRIAS~Y SECURITIES - COUPON
BEGINNING BAi. ANCE:
482,996.24
482,996.24
TREASRY SECq2RITIES - DISCOUNT
BEGINNING BALANCE:
3,3.50,881.16
3,3.50,881.16
MORTGAGE BACK. ED SECURITIES
00071 BANK OF AMERICA
00203 BANK OF AMIH{ICA
00(09 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS
00002 GIBRALTAR SAVINGS
SBTOTALS and ENDING BAiJdN2E
8.000 10/17/94
8.500 10/25/94
9.0(0) 10/03/94
s.500 10/15/94
BEGINNING BALMKIE:
1,589.69
5,636.36
165.24
1,303.65
8,694.94
1,928,711.73
1,920,016.79
11/07/1994 CITY OF RANCIK CDCAMONGA ~ - 6
PORTFOLIOMASTEI{ I~EST){ENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE CITY
OCTOBER 1, 1994 ' OCTOBE~ 31, 1994 CAR{
STATE]) TRANSACTION PURCHASES S~ES/~TURITIES
Tlq~E IBESTM~N'[ { I~UER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWALS BAI.AI+CE
SMALL BUSINESS AI3MINISTRATION
BEGINNI~ BALANCE:
1,101,562.50
1,101,562.50
MI~EU.J. NEOUS SECURITIES - DISCOOllY
TOTALS BEGINNING BALANCE:
B[INNING BAL3.N<2E: 501,904.00
501,904.00
$ 43,439,818.88 3,761,378.13 3,992,615.94 43,208,581.07
13
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REPORT
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City. Council
Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City. Engineer
Mike Olivier, Senior Engineer
ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT
FUNDS FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION
PROGRAM FOR THE METROLINK RAILWAY STATION BEAUTIFICATION
PROJECT.
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution approving a non-matching fund Grant
Application through the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program to develop a vacant
Railway lot. immediately north of the new Metrolink Station, which is overgrown by native Calitbmia
vegetation.
BAC KGROUND/ANAL Y S I S
Council approved the application for funding for an Art-Park last year, which was not successful in
receiving funds. This triangular 3-acre site is north of the new Metrolink Station, and west of Milliken
Avenue. It is surrounded by railway tracks, with the longest side of the triangular shape containing the
north Metrolink platform.
Staff has changed the name of the project from "Art-Park" to "The Metrolink Railway Station
Beautification Project" with a shortened specific name of Metro-Park.
The Grant is administered by the State for use in mitigation of vehicular emissions. There are no
matching funds required by the applicant, however, the local agency if successful. is required to bear the
cost of design and contract administration for construction of the beautification project. The site is
inaccessible by vehicular traffic. With minor modifications it can be reached by foot traffic. The scheme
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
METROLINK RAIL WAY STATION
BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
Page 2
is to create an inviting atmosphere of esthetic quality that also functions to provide additional
oxygenation and the practical effect of a windbreak for the passengers along the Metrolink Station
platforms. The grant request is $444,774.00 for construction of the Metro-Park.
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MO:ly
Attachments
15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL ,'NCIL OF THE CITY OF RAaNCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORN'IA..~d°PROVING THE APPLICATION FOR
GRANT FUNDS FOR THE EN'VIRON~'MENTAL ENHANCEMENT .&ND
MITIGATION PROGRAM L,'NDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA METROLIN'K STATION METRO- PARK
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted AB 471 (Chapter 106 of the Statu~es
of 1989), which is intended to provide $10 million annually for a period of 10 years for grant funds to local.
state and federal agencies and nonprofit entities for projects to enhance and mitigate the environmental
impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities; and
WHEREAS. the Resource Agency has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing grant
proposals and is required to submit to the Califomia Transportation Commission a list of recommended
projects from which the grant recipients will be selected: and
WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the Resources Agency require a resolution
certifying the approval of application by the applicant's governing body before submission of said application
to the State: and
WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with; and
WHEREAS, the applicant if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of Califomia to carry.'
out the environmental enhancement and mitigation project;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION l. Approves the filing of an applicant for the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation
Program t~3r grant assistance.
SECTION 2. Certifies that said applicant will made adequate provisions for operation and
maintenance of the project.
SECTION 3. Appoints William Joseph O'Neil, City. Engineer. as agent of the City. of Rancho
Cucamonga to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to
applications, agreements, amendments. payment requests and so on, which may be necessary. for the
completion of the aforementioned project.
16
Resolution No. 94-
Page 2
PASSED. APPROVED. and ADOPTED this 16th day of November 1994.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
Debra J. Adams. City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City. ofRancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed. approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of November
1994.
Executed this 16th day of November 1994, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams
17
-31- 18
INqOJECT B(XlOARYI~ " , "~ ~ LIES
~T RESISTANT GROUND COVER
NATIVE PLANT DEM(316TRATION GARDEN
EUCALYPTUS GROVE Wli)ROWll
OaV S'mE.AM mSD ORAmtAGE COtroSE
' NOItTH PtAIFORM WITH SHADE STRUCTURES
~,,(CC)NSIRUC IEO WITH STATION Fill)S)
AR1 INSIALLAIKIN ON LOAN
PEIILMI..N~ SCULPTtlE
(TO mE C0~ :SSK~ED BY Cn'V)
Olkl&.* qlALTREE-
COn m" _~k'l file
D(-CORATe~ ~ ~--
TO MAI'CH SOUIH IR.AIFORM
ACCENT TREE
SWEET 6LII
.... DECOkFOSF. D GRAIIIE TRAI.
WI~DI!LOCKIIIURAL WALL .~.~./~J J~
WITH EUCALYPTU~ ~ ,, ,'
,~. . ·
i i i r'l tlJf t s t
~ i i I I I i i i - I I I I I T- I I I 1 :-T: I I I I I & I
I I I . I I I I I | I I l:: I I t I i~:..~l:l~l- l.=i:l-l-I I l"l-
' -~17' ~:. ',~, ~ ......ZJ '"~
· '-. / ~ ,,.:.'
· //, . '? .,s--',
'~ ", / CITRUS. GRAINS. PALMS
~ ..-,
~-* EXISTING UNDERPASS LANDSCAPING
'~ --- METROLINK STATION/PARKING --\
...,~,. .m,,,,~..
I I i I 1-1 I I I I ! I i t t
I i ,-1-- l~l~_l~-.:JIc- 1 i I i I I I I
AT THE RANCHO ~ METIIOI_I~ STATION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP. City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer
APPROVAL OF THE ACQUISITION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.4 ACRES IN THE
AMOUNT OF $2,500,000.00 PLUS $10,000.00 FOR ESCROW FEES, ACCOUNT
NUMBER 16-50400, FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY NECESSARY FOR THE
MODIFICATION OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND ROUTE 66 INTERCHANGE.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the acquisition of approximately 2.4 acres in the amount of $2,500.000.00 plus
$10,000.00 for escrow fees, Account Number 16-50400, for the Right-of-Way necessary for the
modification of the Interstate 15 and Route 66 Interchange.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Sufficient RDA funds were budgeted in Fiscal Year 1994/95 for the acquisition of the fight-of-way
necessary for the modification of the Interstate 15 and Route 66 Interchange. The acreage needed
is approximately 2.4 acres.
On November 6, 1991, Council approved Parcel Map No. 13724, Foothill Marketplace which
reserved 2.4 acres for the modification of the Interstate 15 and Route 66 Interchange.
The project consists of: (1) widening Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) under the I-15 Bridge from two
lanes of traffic to three lanes, (2) adding an on-ramp lane for vehicles turning north on 1-15, (3)
relocating and widening northbound off-ramp from I-15 to Foothill Boulevard, (4) constructing a
new traffic signal for the freeway ramps on the west side of I-15, and (5) relocating and upgrading
the traffic signal for the freeway ramps on the east side of I-I 5.
In February 1992, the City contracted with J. William Murphy and Associates to appraise the
property. The appraisal, based on highest and best use as commercial development, was
$1,324,000.00 or $12.66/sq. ft. An offer based on the City's appraisal was made to the owners of
the property. Foothill Marketplace Partners (FMP) in September 1992. The offer was rejected, and
FMP had the property appraised in March 1993 by Urban Pacific Services Corp. The appraisal,
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 16, 1994
Page 2
based on highest and best use as retail related use, was $2,427,000.00 or $23.22/sq. ft. Again in
October 1993, FMP had the property re-appraised by Michael J. Francis and Associates, Inc. The
appraisal based on retail use was $2,696,000.00 or $25.79/sq. ft.
After FMP's rejection of the City's offer and after their first appraisal of $2,427,000 the City
requested Caltran's Right-of-Way Division to make an appraisal. Without a formal appraisal they
concluded that the property in question should sell for approximately $25.00/sq. ft., or $2.6 million.
Caltran's Right-of-Way Division recently reviewed the City's appraisal and the two appraisals made
at the request of Foothill Marketplace. They have indicated that the City's appraisal is considerably
low due to rapid land changes in the area. The City also agrees with this assessment. Caltrans does
not accept the appraisal done by Michael J. Francis and Associates, Inc., in the amount of $2.7
million since it is not signed, has no photographs of the area, and is generally incomplete. However,
Caltrans accepts the appraisal done by urban Pacific Services Corp., in the amount of $2.4 million
as meeting state and local regulations.
On July 27, 1994, FMP responded in writing that they would sell the property to the City for
$2,500,000.00 or $23.91/sq. ft.
Based on the above assessments by Caltrans and City staff, it is recommended that Council approve
the acquisition of said property in the amount of $2,500,000.00 plus $10,000.00 for escrow fees.
A map showing the subject right-of-way required and a sketch showing the proposed modifications
of the Interchange is attached.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O~eil
City Engineer
WJO:MO:Iy
Attachments
0
> -
Z-l:lq-iI:][}
- ~0~
I
,/
F~
RANClIO
CUCAMONGA
_--_.- ~ ~x ~'/~ ~ ~:-
............... ~_, '___~,_~_ _ ~
CLA2" ' ~
· % NN~', Ctt~Ctl //"
~/~ StiOPPING CENTER
~~ / pRICE CLUB /
~ NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL
(2) NEW 6 LANE WIDENING
(~) NEW ON-RAMP
(~j') RELOCATED OFF*RAMP
(5) REI OCATED UPDATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL
/
\ /
- -- ...... TO DEVOIIF
;_
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (STATE), (AGREEMENT NO. 8-721 ),
FOR FUNDING OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND ROUTE 66 INTERCHANGE
MODIFICATION.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval and execution of a Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
the State of Califomia Department of Transportation (State), (Agreement No. 8-721), for funding
of the Interstate 15 and Route 66 Interchange modification.
BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS
Sufficient RDA funds were budgeted In Fiscal Year 1994/95 for the funding of the Interstate 15 and
Route 66 Interchange Modification Project.
Approximately five years ago, sensing that development was going to occur in the area of Foothill
Boulevard and I- 15, design was undertaken by the City for the modification of the Interstate 15 and
Route 66 Interchange. The engineering consulting firm of Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quaid and Douglas,
Inc., was engaged by the City to prepare and submit to the City and Caltrans plans, specifications
and cost estimates for the Interchange Modification.
The project consists of: (1) widening Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) under the l-15 Bridge from two
lanes of traffic to three lanes, (2) adding an on-ramp lane for vehicles turning north on 1-15, (3)
relocating and widening northbound off-ramp from I-15 to Foothill Boulevard, (4) constructing a
new traffic signal for the freeway ramps on the west side of I-15, and (5) relocating and tipgrading
the traffic signal for the freeway ramps on the east side of I- 15.
Design was completed about two years ago; however, because of funding constraints, the contract
for the construction did not begin. It was the City's feeling that Caltrans should contribute toward
the project since it greatly relieves congestion on I-15. After many meetings with Caltrans. an CITY
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
NOVEMBER 16. 1994
Page 2
agreement was reached with respect to funding and a Joint Powers Agreement was produced for the
construction phase of the project.
The Joint Powers Agreement authorizes Caltrans to advertise, award and administer the construction
contract and to contribute $2,111,000.00 (60.9%) toward the actual construction cost. The City shall
contribute $1,354,000 (39.1%) toward the actual construction cost, funfish a part time construction
inspector and have City's design consultant available to assist Calm in the contract administration.
City Funding will come from RDA Account No. 16-51000. Other possible costs such as
construction change orders, construction related claims and their defense thereof shall be shared
between Caltrans (60.9%) and the City (39.1%).
Upon completion and acceptance of the project Caltrans will accept control of and maintain, at its
own cost and expense, those portions of the project lying within Caltran's fight-of-way. Caltrans
also agrees to pay 100% of the operational cost of the traffic signals and safety lighting.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MO:Iy
Attachments
RANCHO CUCAA/IONGA
,/
10 ONTARIO ..........-'-.-:;::-~='::':'~"'~:::~'~'~""~"
~ .......................... I-
........ ~ ~' '- '_" T_- -::., -~- - -:.-. = _ ' -~ -=-
(/\\SHOPPING CENTER
/ / \
/ PRIGE GLUB
\ ~ /
\ /
\ /
\ \//\
NOTES:
(~) NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL
(2) NEW 6 LANE WIDENING
(~) NEW ON-RAMP
(~) RELOCATED OFF-RAMP
,~,,)(:~) RELOCATED UPDATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL
TO DEVO!-II:i
08-SBd-15,66-5.1/5.3
08303 - 281800
1-15 and Route 66
IC Modifications
District Agreement No. 8-721
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT, entered into on , is
between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its
Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a body
politic and a municipal corporation
of the State of California, referred
to herein as CITY.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
RECITALS
STATE and CITY contemplate constructing State highway
improvements consisting of new eastbound to northbound loop
entrance-ramp, realign and widen northbound exit-ramp, widen
Foothill Boulevard to six lanes, provide provisions for future
ramp meters and modification of traffic signals at the
interchange of 1-15 and Foothill Boulevard (Route 66),
referred to herein as "PROJECT".
STATE is authorized to do all acts necessary, convenient or
proper for the construction or improvement of all highways
under its jurisdiction, possession or control.
CITY is authorized to plan, design, acquire right of way and
construct projects on the State highway system.
STATE and CITY are public agencies authorized under the
Streets and Highways Code and under Government Code Section
6500 et seq. to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement under
which STATE will advertise, award, and administer the
construction contract and provide oversight for PROJECT and
CITY will share the cost of construction for PROJECT.
STATE's share of the cost of construction will be funded with
funds which have been transferred from the East Upland
Underpass project (E.A. 384290).
1
DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-721
(6)
(7)
STATE and CITY mutually desire to jointly participate in the
construction of PROJECT and desire to specify herein the terms
and conditions under which PROJECT is to be constructed,
financed, and maintained.
The purchase of rights of way, the handling of utility
relocation, and preliminary and design engineering for PROJECT
have been subjects of separate prior Cooperative Agreements.
SECTION I
STATE AGREES:
(1)
At no cost to CITY, to provide all labor, materials, tools and
equipment for PROJECT, including advertising, award, contract
administration, Resident Engineer, Bridge Representative,
material source inspection, independent assurance and
specialty testing, and such other construction engineering as
may be required for satisfactory completion of PROJECT.
(2)
At no cost to CITY, to provide oversight responsibility for
construction of PROJECT in accordance with the provisions of
STATE's Policy and Procedure Memorandum No. P90-01.
(3)
To construct PROJECT by contract in accordance with plans and
specifications prepared by CITY and approved by STATE.
(4)
To establish separate PROJECT accounts to accumulate charges
for all costs to be paid for by CITY pursuant to this
Agreement.
(5)
To pay an amount equal to 60.9% of the actual PROJECT
construction cost, estimated to be $2,111,000, but in no event
shall STATE's total obligation for PROJECT construction costs
under this Agreement, excluding costs referred to in Section
III, Article (12) of the Agreement, exceed the amount of
$2,111,000; provided that STATE may, at its sole discretion,
in writing, authorize a greater amount.
(6)
To submit an initial billing in the amount of $120,000 to
CITY, 15 days prior to STATE's bid advertising date of a
construction contract for PROJECT. Said initial billing to
represent CITY initial deposit for one month estimated
construction cost.
DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-721
(7)
Thereafter, to prepare and submit to CITY monthly billing
statements for estimated expenditures for construction one
month in advance as construction of PROJECT proceeds.'
(s)
To consult with CITY on all change orders with an estimated
cost of over $50,000 before implementation, except when
necessary for the safety of motorists and/or pedestrians or
for the protection of property.
(9)
To provide CITY quarterly reports of actual expenditures
compared to the monthly advances made by CITY and to provide
updated planned reimbursement schedules. The cash deposit
amounts may be revised based on updated planned expenditure
schedules. STATE will monitor the actual versus the planned
expenditures monthly to assure that CITY advance deposits
pursuant to Section II, Articles (1) and (2), will always be
sufficient.
(10) Upon completion of PROJECT and all work incidental thereto, to
furnish CITY with a detailed statement of the total actual
costs of construction and SERVICES for PROJECT, including the
costs of any contract claims which have been allowed to the
construction contractor. STATE thereafter shall refund to
CITY (promptly after completion of STATE's audit) any amount
of CITY's deposits and down payments STATE is holding after
actual costs to be borne by CITY have been deducted, or to
bill CITY for any additional amount required to complete
CITY's financial obligations pursuant to this Agreement.
SECTION II
CITY AGREES:
(1)
To deposit with STATE within twenty (20) days of receipt of
billing (which billing will be forwarded 15 days prior to
STATE's bid advertising date of a construction contract for
PROJECT), the amount of $120,000. Said figure represents
CITY's share of the estimated initial deposit for one month
estimated construction cost required to complete PROJECT.
CITY's total obligation for said anticipated PROJECT costs,
exclusive of claims and excluding costs referred to in Section
III, Article (12) of this Agreement, shall not exceed the
amount of $1,354,000, provided that CITY may at its sole
discretion, in writing, authorize a greater amount.
DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-721
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
To deposit with STATE not later than ten (10) working days
preceding the beginning of each month, the estimated
expenditures for that month, and to continue making such
advance deposits on a monthly basis until PROJECT completion.
CITY's share of the construction cost (estimated to be
$1,354,000) shall be an amount equal to 39.1% of the total
actual construction costs, including the cost of construction-
related claims, the cost of STATE defense of any of those
claims and the cost of STATE-furnished material, if any, as
determined after completion of work and upon final accounting
of costs.
To pay STATE upon completion of all work and within twenty
(20) days of receipt of a detailed statement made upon final
accounting of costs therefor, any amount over and above the
aforementioned deposits and payments required to complete
CITY's financial obligation pursuant to this Agreement.
STATE's construction contract claims process will be used in
consultation with CITY. CITY shall abide by the outcome of
said process.
Upon completion of work under this Agreement, CITY will assume
maintenance and the expense thereof for any part of PROJECT
located outside of current STATE right of way until acceptance
of any such part of PROJECT into the State highway system by
STATE, approval by the Federal Highway Administration, if
required, and conveyance of acceptable title to STATE.
SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
(1)
All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are
subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature
and the allocation of resources by the California
Transportation Commission.
(2)
Should any portion of PROJECT be financed with Federal funds
or State gas tax funds, all applicable laws, rules and
policies relating to the use of such funds shall apply
notwithstanding other provisions of this Agreement.
DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-721
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
STATE's goals for utilization of Minority, Women's and
Disadvantaged Veteran Business Enterprise (MBE, WBE and DVBE)
will be included in the construction contract. The contract
goals will be based on a technical analysis of contract items
and certified MBE/WBE/DVBE subcontractors in the area. STATE
will award construction contract to the lowest responsible
bidder who meets the goals or who made, in the sole judgement
of STATE, a good faith effort to do so.
STATE shall not advertise for bids to construct PROJECT until
after this Agreement is executed by both parties thereto.
STATE shall also not advertise for bids to construct PROJECT
until CITY delivers to STATE control and/or possession to
rights of way, free and clear of all encumbrances detrimental
to STATE's present and future uses at a time of CITY's
certification of rights of way ready for construction.
Acceptance of said title by STATE is subject to a review of a
Policy of Title Insurance in STATE's name to be provided and
paid by CITY.
STATE shall not award a contract to construct PROJECT until
after receipt of CITY's deposit required in Article (1) of
Section II of this Agreement.
Prior to advertising of bids for the construction contract for
PROJECT, CITY may terminate this Agreement, in writing,
provided that CITY pays STATE for all PROJECT-related costs
incurred by STATE, under terms of this Agreement.
If, upon opening of bids for PROJECT, it is found that the
lowest responsible bid is not more than the Engineer's
Estimate, STATE and CITY may conduct a joint review of the
bids immediately following opening of bids and prior to
submittal of STATE District 8's letter of recommendation to
award to STATE's Office Engineer in Sacramento, if so
requested by CITY. After the joint review and within the time
allowed for award STATE may award the construction contract
for PROJECT.
If upon review of the aforementfoned bids, CITY, by written
notice to STATE's District 8 Office, elects to not proceed
with PROJECT, thereby causing STATE to reject all bids. CITY
agrees to pay STATE for all PROJECT-related costs incurred by
STATE, including all legal costs and damages resulting from
rejection of all bids for PROJECT.
If, upon opening of bids for PROJECT, it is found that the
lowest responsible bid exceeds the Engineer's Estimate, STATE
and CITY shall consult upon a course of action. If, after
31
DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-721
fifteen (15) days, a course of action is not agreed upon, this
Agreement shall be deemed to be terminated by mutual consent
pursuant to Article (10) of this Section III.
(10) If termination of this Agreement is by mutual consent, CITY
will bear one hundred percent (100%) of all PROJECT-related
costs incurred by STATE pursuant to this Agreement.
(11) After award of the construction contract for PROJECT, should
CITY, after a request by STATE, not authorize funding beyond
the amounts stated in Articles (1), (2), and (3) of Section II
above, STATE shall insure that all operating roadways are in
a safe and satisfactory permanent operating condition and then
shall cease work on PROJECT. Additional costs incurred in
excess of payments made will be billed and subject to payment
by CITY within thirty (30) days or STATE, acting through the
State Controller, may withhold an equal amount from future
apportionments due CITY from the Highway User Tax Fund.
(12) If, during PROJECT construction, any unforeseen conflict with
existing public and/or private utility facilities occur, or if
there is a significant change required in any approved utility
relocation plan, the provisions of STATE's current Standard
Specifications Section 8-1.10 (Utilities and Non-Highways
Facilities) shall apply.
(13) In the construction of PROJECT, CITY may, at no cost to STATE,
furnish a representative, if it so desires. Said
representative and STATE's Engineer will cooperate and consult
with each other, but the decisions of STATE's Resident
Engineer shall prevail as final, binding and conclusive in all
matters concerning PROJECT construction contract.
(14) If any unforeseen potential hazardous waste sites are
encountered during construction of PROJECT, STATE and CITY
shall meet and confer on a course of action. The
responsibilities and costs for any action shall be covered by
amendment to this Agreement.
(15) Upon completion and acceptance of the PROJECT construction
contract by STATE, STATE will accept control of and maintain,
at its own cost and expense, those portions of PROJECT lying
within STATE's right of way, except local roads delegated to
CITY for maintenance.
DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-721
(16) CITY will accept control and maintain, at its own cost and
expense, the portions of PROJECT lying outside the STATE's
right of way. Also, CITY will maintain, at CITY expense,
local roads within STATE's right of way delegated to CITY for
maintenance.
(17) STATE will maintain the traffic control signal system and
safety lighting as installed and pay an amount equal to
100% of the total maintenance costs, including electrical
energy costs.
(18) STATE will operate the traffic signal(s) as installed and pay
one hundred percent (100%) of the operation cost.
(19) Upon completion of all work under this Agreement, ownership
and title to materials, equipment and appurtenances installed
within STATE's right of way will automatically be vested in
STATE, and materials, equipment and appurtenances installed
outside of STATE's right of way will be automatically vested
in CITY. No further agreement will be necessary to transfer
ownership as hereinabove stated.
(20) Nothing in the provisions of this Agreement is intended to
create duties or obligations to or rights in third parties not
parties to this Agreement or affect the legal liability of
either party to the Agreement by imposing any standard of care
with respect to the maintenance of State highways different
from the standard of care imposed by law.
(21) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of
anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated
to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed
that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall
fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of
California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits
or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or
on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section
810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be
done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority
or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement.
(22) Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof is
responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of
anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated
to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed
that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall
DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-721
fully defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY from all
claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description
brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government
Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or
omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any
work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this
Agreement.
(23) No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement
shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the
parties hereto and no oral understanding or agreement not
incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties
hereto.
DISTRICT AGREEMENT NO. 8-721
(24) Except as otherwise provided in Articles (6) (8), and (10) of
this Section III, those portions of Agreement pertaining to
the construction of PROJECT shall terminate upon completion
and acceptance of the construction contract for PROJECT by
STATE, or on June 1, 1997, whichever is earlier; However, the
ownership, operation, maintenance, liability, and claims
clauses shall remain in effect until terminated or modified in
writing, by mutual agreement. Should any construction-related
claim arising out of PROJECT be asserted against STATE, CITY
agrees to extend the termination date of this Agreement and
provide additional funding as required to cover CITY
proportionate share of costs or execute a subsequent Agreement
to cover those eventualities.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS
Director of Transportation
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By
Mayor
By
KEN STEELE, District Director
Attest:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE:
Attorney, Department of Transportation
District Resource Manager
CERTIFIED AS TO PROCEDURE:
Accounting Administrator
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager
PAYMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES ON HVAC SYSTEM AT THE
OLD LIBRARY BUILDING
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize budget appropriation in the amount of $1,000.00 from Account 13-4563-6028 and
payment to Mathaudhu Engineering, Inc. for evaluation of the HVAC system at the Old Library site.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On July 1, 1994, the City assumed ownership of the Old Library building located on Base Line
Road. At that time, staff performed a cursory evaluation of the facility and make some
determinations regarding the building's physical and structural integrity. One area which was
beyond staffs capability of evaluating was the existing HVAC system. Staff received quotes from
three mechanical engineering firms and chose the services of the least expensive firm, that of
Mathaudhu Engineering, Inc.
Funds are available for this service from the Recreation Fund Balance 13-4563.
Respectfully submitted,
g~aServices Manager
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
November 2, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director
REVIEW OF POLICY REGARDING GIFTS AND GRATUITIES
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council review and receive and file this report
regarding gifts and gratuities.
Background
In February of this year, the City Council approved a City/District policy concerning
gifts and gratuities. Upon approval, the Council directed staff to return after
approximately six months with an evaluation of the policy and it's impact on
operations.
With enactment of the policy came several questions from departments that, within
the conduct of their programs, solicit donations. Such solicitations are primarily
from Community Services who use the donations as awards and prizes for their
programs. The policy allows for the type of solicitation noted above and therefore
does not impose unreasonable restrictions on the departments operations. Virtually
no other issues have arisen concerning the policy.
Summary
Staffs assessment is that the policy has been effective and has not been burdensome
upon the departments in carrying out their responsibilities. The policy will be
redistributed as a reminder to employee's prior to the coming holiday season.
Respectfully submitted,
R r~!uez Director
RCD/rc
CITY/FIRE DISTRICT POLICY
GIFTS AND GRATUITIES
Purpose:
To provide guidance for employees when in the course of their work offers of gifts,
favors, or gratuities may be made.
Policy:
It shall be the policy of the City/District to disallow any official or employee from
accepting any gift, whether in the form of service, loan, thing, or promise from any
person, firm, or corporation, other than that paid by the City/District.
No official or employee:
1. Shall accept any gift, favor, money, or thing of value (including free meals or
offers of discount not available to the general public or to all employees).
2. Shall grant in the discharge of duties any improper favor, service, or thing of
value.
Shall permit delivery at the work site (office or City/District facility) any gift
or thing of value. Any acceptance shall be with the approval of the
department head.
4. Shall use their official position to solicit special privileges for themselves or
others.
Tokens of appredation or modest gifts given in appredation such as flowers, candy,
homemade foods, and similar items can be accepted with the approval of the
department head. Further, the solicitation of donations for City/District programs
shall be allowed when duly authorized and approved by the City/District.
City/District Policy
Gifts and Gratuities
Page 2
It is not the intent of this policy to offend well-intentioned members of the
community, but rather to permit an opportunity for members of the City/District to
enjoy sincere offers of appreciation without apprehension concerning the intent of a
gift.
RCD/dah
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~eil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF PARCEL MAP 12877 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING
MAIIN'TENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HILLSIDE ROAD, EAST OF MOONSTONE AVENUE, SUB1V[ITTED BY IRWIN
B. GOLDEN
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recomended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 12877 and
ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District
Nos. I and 2, and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Parcel Map 12877 was approved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 1992, for the division of 3.28
acres of land into 2 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located
on the north side of Hillside Road, east of Moonstone Avenue.
The improvements associated with parcel I have been completed. The street improvements fronting Hillside
Road will be installed upon development of Parcel 2.
A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver
to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office.
Respectfully submit'ted,
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:
Attachment
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NO. 12877
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 12877, submitted by Irwin B. Golden, and consisting
of 2 parcels located on the north side of Hillside Road, east of Moonstone Avenue was approved by
the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on December 9, 1992, and is in
compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act;
and
WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 12877 is the final map of the division of land approved as
shown on said tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the f'mal map
by the City Council of said City have now been met.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Parcel Map No. 12877 is hereby
approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for
record.
41
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED This 16th day of November, 1994.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP
12877
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously
formed a special maintenaxice district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972', being Division 15, Pan 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinai~er
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional terntory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the terntory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown m Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B' attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED This 16th day of November, 1994.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Denms L. Stout, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the
16th day of November, 1994.
Executed this 17th day of November, 1994, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
AA
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 2
~A ~ CEI_ /WA ~ /2~
/G/IT
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
tl
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
' ,~. M I2 ~77
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EXHIBIT "B"
WORK PROGR./LM
PROJECT: PM 12877
STREET LIGHTS:
Dist. 5800[,
S1
S2
NUMBER OF LAMPS
9500L 16.0001, 22.0001,
27.500I.
LANDSCAPING:
Dist.
LI
Community
Equestrian
Trail
D.G.S.F.
2580*
Tuff
S.F.
Non-Turf
S.F.
Trees
Ea.
7'
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
Assessment Units
By District
Parcel DU S1 S2 L1
N/A 2 2 2 2
Existing items installed with
original project. This Parcel
Map will add one street light
only.
Form Date 11/16/94
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~MONGA
STAFF REPORT
November 16. 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP. City. Manager
William J. O'Neil, City. Engineer
Linda R. Beek, Junior Enginee/
AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR BIKE
PATHWAYS, LOCATED AT TERRA VISTA PARKWAY. CHURCH STREET, FOURTH
STREET, ARROW ROUTE, GREENWAY CORRIDOR, ETIWANDA AVENUE,
ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, TO LAIRD CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INCORPORATED, FOR THE AMOUNT OF $61,734.64 ($56.122.40 PLUS
10% CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNDED FROM AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
GRANT ACCOUNT NO. 14-4158-6028
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize for execution.
the contract for Bike Pathways to the lowest responsive bidder, Laird Construction Company, Incorporated,
for the amount of $61,734.64 ($56,122.40 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Air Quality
Improvement Grant Account No. 14-4158-6028.
BACKGROUND/ANA! ,YSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on October 18. 1994, for the subject
project. Laird Construction Company, Incorporated. is the apparent lowest responsive bidder, with a bid
amount of $56, 122.40 (see attached bid summary.). The Engineer's estimate was $68,847.50. Staff has
reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff
has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the
bid documents.
Respectfully submitted,
Willia~.O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:LRB:sd
Attachments
47
Bid Opening, October 18, 1994
Item Item Unit of
No. Description easur
I Clearing & Grubbing LS
2 Crushed Aggregate Base TON
3 Sawcut LF
4 AC Pavement (4") TON
5 2" x 4" Redwood Header LF
6 Traffic Striping LS
7 Traffic Control LS
8 Traffic Signs W/post EA
9 Traffic Signs on
Street Light EA
10 Bike Signs W/posts EA
11 Bike Signs on St. Light EA
12 Markings Word & Arrow LS
Total Bid
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS
BIKE PATHWAYS
Engineer's Estimate
Laird Construction
Engineer's Estimate $64,267.50
Guitierrez Construction
stimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
Quantity Prices Prices Prices
1 1,500.00 1,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00
136 23.00 3,128.00 28.50 3,876.00 12.00
1,355 1.50 2,032.50 0.70 948.50 1.25
136 50.00 6,800.00 40.15 5,460.40 40.00
1,355 3.00 4,065.00 2.50 3,387.50 2.50
1 13,000.00 13,000.00 7,530.00 7,530.00 15,500.00
I 3,500.00 3,500.00 4,075.00 4,07500 2,500.00
22 125.00 2,750.00 100.00 2,200.00 150.00
0.00 0.00
28 60.00 1,680.00 55.00 1,540.00 35.00
89 128.00 11,392.00 105.00 9,345,00 150.00
182 60.00 10,920.00 50.00 9,100.00 35.00
I 3,500.00 3,500.00 4,660.00 4,660.00 500.00
0.00 0.00
64,267.50 56, 122.40
J & S Sign Company, Inc.
Unit Total
Prices
5,000.00 5,700 00 5,700.00
1,63200 30.00 4,080.00
1,693.75 1.00 1,355.00
5,440.00 42.00 5,712.00
3,387.50 2.60 3,52300
15,500.00 12,260.00 12,260.00
2,500.00 5,790.00 5,790.00
3,300.00 112.00 2,464.00
0.00 0.00
980.00 33.00 924.00
13,350.00 117.00 10,413 00
6,370.00 36.00 6,552.00
500.00 3,060.00 3,060.00
0.00 0.00
59,653.25 61,833.00
Item Item Unit of
No. Description easur
1.00
300
4.00
5.00
7.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
1600
Clearing & Grubbing LS
rushed Aggregate Base TON
Sawcut LF
AC Pavement (4") TON
2" x 4" Redwood Header LF
Traffic Striping LS
Traffic Control LS
Traffic Signs W/post EA
Traffic Signs on
Street Light EA
Bike Signs W/posts EA
Bike Signs on St. Light EA
Markings Word & Arrow LS
Total Bid
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS
BIKE PATHWAYS
Inland Asphalt & Coatings KDK Engineering
UndenNood Construction
Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total
Quantity Prices Prices Prices
1 4.500.00 4,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
136 26.00 3,536.00 18.00 2,448.00
1,355 0.40 542.00 1.50 2,032.50
136 47.00 6.392.00 65.00 8,840.00
1,355 3.50 4,742.50 2.00 2,710.00
I 10.120.00 10,120.00 13,000.00 13,000.00
I 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 2.000.00
22 108.00 2,376.00 155.00 3.410.00
0.00 0.00
28 49.00 1,372.00 75.00 2,100.00
89 132.50 11,792.50 145.00 12,90500
182 74.60 13,577.20 3500 6.370.00
I 2,552.00 2,552.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
0.00 0.00
62,502.20 64,815.50
JEG Construction
Unit Total
Prices
5,000.00 5,000.00 12,325.00 12,325.00
40.00 5,440.00 34.00 4,624.00
2.00 2,710.00 0.90 1,219.50
50.00 6,800.00 4400 5.984.00
3.00 4,065.00 4.00 5,420.00
10,120.00 10,120.00 7,200.00 7,200.00
4,000.00 4,000.00 600.00 600.00
110.00 2,420.00 93.00 2,046.00
0.00 0.00
60.00 1,680.00 75.00 2.100.00
135.00 12.015.00 125.00 11,125.00
80.00 14,560.00 85.00 15,470.00
2,900.00 2,900.00 4.200.00 4,200.00
0.00 0.00
71,710.00 72,313.50
Item Item Unit of
No. Description easur
1.00
300
4.00
500
7.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
1600
Clearing & Grubbing LS
rushed Aggregate Base TON
Sawcut LF
AC Pavement (4") TON
2" x 4" Redwood Header LF
Traffic Striping LS
Traffic Control LS
Traffic Signs W/post EA
Traffic Signs on
Street Light EA
Bike Signs W/posts EA
Bike Signs on St. Light EA
Markings Word & Arrow LS
Total Bid
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS
BIKE PATHWAYS
Sean Malek Eng & Const., Inc.
Estimated Unit Total
Quantity Prices
1 7,800.00
136 42.00
1,355 1.00
136 69.00
1,355 2,50
1 12,000.00
1 18,000.00
22 123.00
28 56.00
89 151.00
182 8500
I 3,000.00
7,800.00
5,712.00
1,355.00
9,384.00
3,387.50
12,000.00
18,000.00
2,706.00
0.00
1,568.00
13,439.00
15,470.00
3,000.00
90,821.50
::: j.r"1 RANCHO CUC AMONGA
BIKE PATHWAY
LOCATIONS
1 CHURCH AND TERRA VISTA PARKV~AY
2 FOURTH STREET
3 ARROW ROUTE
4 TERRA VISTA GREENWAY CORRIDOR
5 ETrWANDA AVENUE
6 ARCHIBALD AVENUE
7
51
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Bullet, City Planner
Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor
RENEWAL OF THE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF S~_N BERNARDINO
FOR WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES
MECOMMEN'DATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the
renewal of Contract Services with the County of San Bernardino to
provide weed abatement programs.
BACKGROUND: For the past five (5) years, the City of Rancho Cucamonga
has contracted with the San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture
to provide fire hazard weed abatement. This agreement has concluded.
The contract service is currently administered by the Code Enforcement
Office, and includes routine abatement of weeds, tumbleweeds, and
combustible debris on property within the City through two (2) yearly
programs. Beginning in April and August of each year, the Hazard
Abatement Officer surveys all properties to determine if hazardous
conditions exist. Subsequently, notices are sent to property owners
requesting abatement. If removal of weeds and other combustibles does
not occur, the County contracts with outside firms to provide clean-up
and abatement.
ANALYSIS: The new Agreement is essentially the same as for the previous
five (5) year period. The total cost for the program shall not exceed
$12,500.00 per year, representing no increase in cost to the City. The
actual sum will be based on the total indirect progam costs, less any
surplus fees collected. The actual cost for abatement is billed to the
property owner and, as necessary, assessed to that property as a lien
held by the County.
This new agreement does differ from the previous one by the deletion of
the five (5) year term limit. The new Agreement will continue
indefinitely on a year to year basis unless the City or the County
choose to renegotiate or terminate. The City Attorney has reviewed and
approved the new Agreement as to form and content.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Renewal of Agreement with County of
San Bernardino for Weed Abatement Services
November 16, 1994
Page 2
CONCLUSION: The existing Agreement and weed abatement program have
proven to be an effective means of mitigating fire hazards on vacant and
developing property within the City at a nominal cost. The program has
also been used as a resource by the Code Enforcement staff in resolving
violations.
Until such time as the quantity of vacant and developing properties
diminishes, the County Weed Abatement Program is a cost effective and
comprehensive way to deal with fire hazards and nuisances present in
Rancho Cucamonga.
ly sub ' ed,
BB:RLA:nas
DATE:
November 16, 1994
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF LEASE AMENDMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL, INC. TO ALLOW FOR AN
EXPANSION OF THE STADIUM TO BE PAID FOR BY THE TENANT
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the amendment to the Lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
Valley Baseball Club, Inc. which provides for an expansion of the stadium located at
the Adults Sports Park. The cost of the design and construction am to be paid for by
the Tenant.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The tenant has made a request to expand the number of seats, by approximately 400,
within the stadium in order to provide additional opportunities for fans to enjoy the
baseball games beginning in 1995. The seat expansion will occur behind home plate
and over the dugout area. The tenant has undertaken design work in order to show
that an expansion of the stadium can occur without disrupting the existing pedestrian
and service flows established within the stadium. Staff has reviewed the proposed
plans and has also evaluated the parking needs for the expansion. Staff has
determined that the proposed expansion can be serviced with the existing concession
areas but will require modifications to bathroom facilities which have alrady been
adressed by the tenant. Staff has also determined that there is sufficient parking to
accommodate the additional seating capacity. The tenant is prepared to undertake
construction so the expansion can be completed prior to the beginning 1995 baseball
league season.
In order for the tenant to begin this work it is necessary to amend the Lease for specific
provisions relating to the construction as well as the business relationship between the
City and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. This is important because while this is not a public
works project, the City will be the owner of the improvements. The following are the
primary lease changes/provisions that relate to the construction or business points for
the stadium expansion:
· Language clarification regarding the location of promotional tickets which are to
be used by the City has been added.
November 16, 1994
Staff Report Stadium Expansion
page 2
The tenant will contribute to the cost of providing security for the stadium facility.
The tenant will, as part of the expansion construction, provide secudty cameras
in the concourse level of the stadium.
Should construction not be completed for the league game play, a penalty of
$7600 will be paid by Valley Baseball Club, Inc. to the City for each league
game that is played elsewhere.
The City will be responsible for initial clean up immediately following league
play in the stadium and the parking lots.
During special events a promoter will have the opportunity to provide
concession services using portable facilities provided they meet health
requirements and can service the expected crowd.
The Contractor shall meet all of the requirements of a contractor undertaking a
City project and shall be approved by the City. This includes such items as
having a Class A license, providing the required bonding amounts, and
providing the appropriate insurance certificates.
The City will approval all changes and substitutions to materials, drawings and
specifications.
All shop drawings will require City approval.
The as built drawings for the expansion will be submitted to the City upon
completion of the project.
As indicated before, the Tenant is paying for the expansion of the stadium. The City
will own the expansion improvements once they are completed. This expansion will
further enhance opportunities for fans to enjoy games and will continue to add to the
success of the stadium and the sports complex.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda D. Daniels
Redevelopment Manager
ent Director
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
November l 6, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13304
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY AND MT.
VIEW DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES
RECOMM~-NDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement
extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANA! .YSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvement
for Tract 13304 were approved by the City Council on October 5, 1989, in the following amounts:
Faithful Performance Bonds:
Labor and Materials Bonds:
Terra Vista Parkway
Mt. View Dr.
$421,296. $557,954.
$210,648. $278,977
The developer. Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement
agreement, in order to schedule and cap pave Terra Vista Parkway and Mr. View Dr. Copies of the
Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
Wi!li~. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:Iy
Attachments
LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP.
1156 North Mountain Avenue/P.O, Box 670/Upland, California 917854)670
g09/gBS-0971 FAX: gOg/g4g-6700
October 26, 1994
Mr. Steve Gilliland
Public Works Inspector
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91 729
Re: Tract 13304
Dear Steve:
Lewis Homes of California is hereby requesting an extension of the
Improvement Agreement for Tract 13304. We request this extension because
we have not completed the tract to the north (Tract 14407) and until that is
done will not be capping the street in front of Tract 13304.
Enclosed are:
Improvement Agreement Extension form in triplicate (notarized)
$251. O0 check
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions. My direct line
number is (909) 949-6691.
Sincerely,
LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP.
Sheri Mclnturff
Project Development
57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA/gCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVTEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVTEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13304
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November
16, 1994, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way
adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally
located at the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mr. View Drive; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements,
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof,
conjunction with the development of said Tract 13304; and
described in said
is to be done in
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in
said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby
authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City, Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto ~
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14139,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 25TH
STREET, SUBMITTED BY AHMANSON DEVELOPMENT
RKCOM2MF, NDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement
extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANA! ,YSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvement
for Tract 14139 were approved by the City Council on November 7, 1991, in the following total amounts:
Faithful Performance Bonds: $5,039,809
Labor and Materials Bonds: $2,519,905
The developer, Ahmanson Development, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said
improvement agreement. The improvements have not yet started due to the poor housing market. Copies
of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
William J.~eil
City Engineer
WJO:SMG: ly
Attachments
59
AHMANSON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
1370 SOClTH VALLEY VISTA DR, SC[ITE 200, DIA/,~OriD BAR, CALIFORNIA 91765-3921 · (714) 860-5400
October 18, 1994
Mr. Joe O~eil, P.E.
City Engineer
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
OCT 19 1994
OF ~N~;HO
ENGI~IEERtNG DIVISION
Re: Tract 14139
Dear Mr. O~eil:
The bonds for the referenced tract were approved on November 6, 1991 and the tract was
recorded on December 17, 1991. Rough grading, erosion protection, offtract sewer, 24th Street
storm drain, and Zone 5C water improvements have been completed. The remaining
infrastructure and intract work has not yet begun because of the poor housing market.
The subdivision agreements represented by the following bonds will expire on November 6, 1994
unless extended by the City Council. The Pre-Condemnation Agreement and Improvement for
Offsite Improvements will also expire on the same date unless extended. I respectfully request a
one year extension of these agreements and have enclosed a $215.00 check for the review fee.
Please contact me if you need further information.
BOND # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
5712760-0713 $ 214,000
5712759-0713 $ 216,000
5712757-0713 $ 201,000
5712761-0713 $1,298,000
5712758-0713 $ 903,000
5712762-0713 $ 690,000
5712755-0713 $ 580,382
5712756-0713 $ 730,509
Very truly yo, urs,
Etiwanda Ave. Phase I
Interim Detention Basin
Landscape for Etiwanda Ave. & Paseos
On-site street improvements
On-site storm drain improvements
Westerly channel line "H'
Northerly channel XIV-8
Detention basin in Etiwanda spreading grounds
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14139
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November
16, 1994, by Ahmanson Development as developer, for the improvement of public
right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and
generally located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 25th Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said Tract 14139; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in
said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby
authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
61
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam. AICP. City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector
ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE 30" WATER LINE FOR TRACT 13750, LOCATED ON 24TH
STREET EAST OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD
RECOMMENDATION
The required improvements for the 30" water line associated with Tract 13750, have been completed in an
acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City
Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance
Bond in the amount of $92,000.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Tract 13750 - 30" water line - located on 24th Street east of Wardman Bullock Road
DEVELOPER:
First City
15010 Summit Avenue
Fontana, Calif. 92336
Release: Faithful Performance Bond $92,000
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O~leil
City Engineer
WJO:SMG:Iy
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR TP, ACT 13750 - 30" WATER LINE, AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13750 30"
water line have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized
to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -~
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REPORT
November 16, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'N'eil, City Engineer
Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector
ACCEPT THE MILLIKEN AVENUE PARK PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 94.-033, AS COMPLETE,
RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO
FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL
CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $191,413.26
RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Milliken Avenue Park Parking Lot Improvement
Project, Contract No. 94-033, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of
Completion, and retain the Faith~al Performance in the amount of $153,727.00 to be used as the
Maintenance Bond and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of
$153,727.00 six months a.~er the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also,
authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $17,418.61, 35 days aeter the approval of the
final contract amount of $191,413.26.
BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project
documentation, is $191,413.26, which includes 3 contract change orders for landscaping of the new
parking and miscellaneous grading and soding adjacent to the volleyball courts. The original amount
approved by Council was $153,727.00, and the revised approved by Council is $191,413.26.
Respec~~~
William J. O'Neil
City Engineer
WJO:dlw
Attachment
j
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE PARK PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Milliken
Avenue Park Parking Lot Improvement Project has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized
to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County.
ORDINANCE NOo 537
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ESTABLISHING TIME
LIMITATIONS FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY
CODE SECTION 33333.6.
A. Recitals.
(i) Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6 requires
this Council to establish by ordinance time limitations
applicable to the constituent portions of the Rancho
Redevelopment Project of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
("Agency" hereafter).
(ii) The time limitations referred to in Recital (i),
above, include a time limitation on Agency's establishment of
loans, advances and indebtedness pursuant to Health and Safety
Code subsections 33333.2(a)(2) or 33333.4(a)(2), which cannot
exceed twenty (20) years from the adoption of the subject
redevelopment plan or January 1, 2004, whichever is later. Said
time limitation does not prevent Agency from incurring certain
prescribed debts related to low and moderate income housing.
(iii) The time limitations referred to in Recital (i),
above, include a time limitation on the effectiveness of a
redevelopment plan which cannot exceed forty (40) years from the
adoption of the plan or January 1, 2009, whichever is later.
(iv) The time limitations referred to in Recital (i),
above, include, with some stated exceptions, a limitation on
Agency paying indebtedness or receiving property taxes pursuant
to California Health and Safety Code Section 33670 so that the
same may not occur after ten (10) years from the termination of
the effectiveness of the subject redevelopment plan.
(v) This Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project as
presently constituted was established by Ordinance No. 166,
adopted December 23, 1981.
(vi) The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish
the time limitations specified in Health and Safety Code Section
33333.6 for Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project Area.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby does ordain as follows:
Section ~. It hereby is established that January 1,
2004 is the latest date upon which Agency may establish loans,
advances and indebtedness for the Rancho Redevelopment Project
Area.
The time limitations confirmed in this Section 1 shall
not prevent Agency from incurring debt to be paid from Agency's
low and moderate income housing fund or establishing more debt in
order to fulfill Agency's housing obligations under California
Health and Safety Code Section 33413.
Section ~. Pursuant to California Health and Safety
Code subsection 33333.6(b), December 23, 2021 hereby is
established as the date upon which the effectiveness of the
Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project Area shall be deemed to be
terminated.
Section ~. Pursuant to California Health and Safety
Code subsection 33333.6(c), except as provided in California
Health and Safety Code subsections 33333.6(g) and (h), December
23, 2031 hereby is established as the latest date on which Agency
shall pay indebtedness related to its activities in or receive
property taxes from its Rancho Redevelopment Project Area.
Section ~. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage
of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the
manner required by law.
PASSED this day of , 1994.
Mayor
I, Debra Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of
, 1994, and was finally passed at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the
day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
, 1994, by the following vote:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga
C\131\ORI]33333,6~RC 18.20
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
November 16. 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain. AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-05 - CITY OF
KANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to streamline the procedures for review of single
family residences in hillside areas.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval.
ANALYSIS
The Hillside Development Ordinance was adopted in 1990 to govem development within those areas of the
community def'med as hillside (i.e., 8 percent slope or greater). The proposed amendment would give approval
authority to the City Planner for individual custom residences. Experience has shown that, in most cases, the
lot has been rough graded and the major grading issues were already decided; therefore, it is not necessary for
individual residences to go before the full Planning Commission. The guidelines and standards of the Hillside
Development Ordinance are comprehensive enough to regulate the design of custom homes subject to Design
Review' Committee and Grading Committee scrutiny.
Respectfully submitted.
City Planner
BB:DC: mlg
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 12, 1994
Exhibit "B" - Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated October 12, 1994
Exhibit "C" - Resolution No. 94-79 Recommending Approval
Exhibit "D" - Ordinance
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
October 12, 1994
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to amend the procedures for review of single family
residences in hillside areas·
BACKGROUND: On September 14, 1994 the Planning Commission stated that
individual custom residences in the hillside area should not require review by
the Planning Con~nission. The Commission felt that review by the Design Review
Committee and approval by the City Planner would be more appropriate.
ANALYSIS: The Hillside Development Ordinance was adopted in 1990 to govern
development within those areas of the community defined as hillside (i.e., 8
percent slope or greater). The Ordinance currently requires review and
approval by the Planning Commission when one or more of the following
conditions exist:
Natural slopes equal to or greater than 15 percent on all or part of
a subject site.
For fills or excavations equal to or exceeding 5 feet in vertical
depth at their deepest point measured from the natural ground
surface.
For excavations or fills, or any combination thereof, equal to or
exceeding 1,500 cubic yards.
Any excavation or fill which will encroach onto or alter a natural
drainage channel or watercourse. (Should be prohibited unless
alternate drainage is provided).
Any other proposal referred to the Planning Commission by the Grading
Committee or City Planner.
The proposed amendment would give approval authority to the City Planner.
This action would be consistent with the recently adopted streamlining
amendments. Since adoption of the Hillside Development Ordinance, many custom
homes have been processed through the Planning Commission. Based upon the
experience gained, staff would agree with the Planning Commission's comments
that it is not necessary for individual residences to go before the full
Planning Commission. In most cases, the lots were previously rough graded and
the major grading issues were already decided. The guidelines and standards
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCA 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 12, 1994
Page 2
of the Hillside Development Ordinance are comprehensive enough to regulate the
design of custom homes subject to Design Review Con~nittee and Grading
Con~nittee scrutiny.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the amendment to the City Council through adoption of the attached
Resolution of approval.
Respectfully submitted,
City Planner
BB:DC:mlg
Attachments:
Resolution of Approval for DCA 94-05
Draft Ordinance
DRAFT
FOR DISCUSSION PUrPoSEs
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting
October 12, 1994
Chairman Barker called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council
Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California. Chairman Barker then led in the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS:
PRESENT:
David Barker, Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel,
John Melcher, Peter Tolstoy
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT:
Brad Bullet, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal
Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Ralph Hanson, Deputy
City Attorney; Larry Henderson. Principal Planner; Dan
James, Senior Civil Engineer; Maria Perez, Assistant
Engineer: Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements at this time.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Lumpp, carried 5-0, to approve the
minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of July 13, 1994, as amended.
Motion: Moved by Eelchef, seconded by Lumpp, carried 3-0-0-2 with McNiel and
Tolstoy abstaining, to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of
September 14, 1994, as amended.
Motion: Moved by Eelchef, seconded by Lumpp, carried 3-0-0-2 with McNiel and
Tolstoy abstaining, to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of
September 14, 1994.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to
amend the procedures for review of single family residences in hillside
areas.
#l
DRAFT
r'-~' ~- D~CI mSSlOl'.,l PtJ~c, sr-.s 0:~I Y'
Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report.
Commissioner Melcher observed that if an individual wishes to build a single
family custom home on a lot up to 7.99 percent slope in the City, the review
is by counter staff. He noted that if the slope is 8 percent or greater, the
applicant must go through a more extensive process and he felt there is a
temptation to tinker with the design of the house on the part of the various
review bodies. He favored allowing such projects to be approved by the
Grading Committee and then receiving counter approval like any other single
family house or going through City Planner review. He did not think they
should have to go through Design Review.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt that in the past changes had to be made where houses
did not fit into the required envelope. Me favored having the applications go
through the Design Review Committee with final approval granted by the City
Planner.
Mr. Coleman said the ordinance currently only requires Grading Committee
Review but it has been staff's policy since the inception of the ordinance to
run all single family homes in the hillside area through the Design Review
Committee. He noted staff had suggested verbiage to codify that practice.
Commissioner McNiel stated the Commission has been moving in the direction of
delegating more items to staff, but he said he was hesitant to do so with
hillside homes because most of the homes in these circumstances are large. He
was hesitant to drop them from the Design Review process.
Chairman Barker asked for clarification that single family houses in the
hillside area have been reviewed by the Commission even if there were no
problems.
Mr. Coleman responded affirmatively.
Commissioner Lumpp stated that ~e is in favor of streamlining the process but
said he had supported City Planner approval of such projects because Design
Review would be looking at them to provide a second look beyond the counter
staff. He said he would be reluctant to take such projects away from the
Design Review Committee.
Commissioner Melcher felt that creates a double standard because it allows
someone with a lot of less than 8 percent slope to build anywhere else in the
City without submitting to the Design Review Committee. He did not think that
the Design Review Committee is any more competent than the Grading Review
Committee to assess whether such projects fit the Hillside Ordinance in terms
of the grading.
Commissioner Tolstoy noted that often there is a way to have a house conform
to the Hillside Ordinance with the use of retaining walls or other adjustments
in the method of grading. He felt review by the Design Review Committee is
beneficial to the applicant, in that he thought the Commissioners and staff
have been able to give assistance in solving problems. He thought the
Planning Commission Minutes
-2-
October 12, 1994
DRAFT
FOR DISCUSSION PURPC~F_.~ P,.
· ,.,
exchange between the Commissioners, staff, and the applicant has at times
brought out innovative ways co bring the house into compliance.
Commissioner Lumpp felt that Commissioner Melther is more than qualified to
review houses in the hillside area. He felt he also had some expertise in
dealing with houses in hillside areas and noted chat even those Commissioners
not on the Design Review Committee receive copies of the submittal and have an
opportunity co review them. He did not think it creates a double standard.
He suggested the ordinance could be changed later if the Commission felt there
was no reason to review the houses·
Commissioner McNiel asked if there is a significant difference Ln the size of
the parcels with over 8 percent grade as opposed to Chose which are under
8 percent.
Mr. Coleman replied that there is and the lots which are 8 percent are higher
are generally a minimum half acre.
Commissioner McNiel felt that is reasonable criteria because of the potential
size of the house.
Commissioner Melther felt it may be more fair to base the standard on lot size
instead of slope so that everyone in that lot size would be subject to the
same criteria.
Commissioner McNiel supported staff's proposed language.
Chairman Barker stated he would like to be sure the process is not delayed.
Commissioner Melcher suggested that staff be given the authority to approve
such projects but make the applicant aware at the outset that staff may, at
its discretion, refer the project to Design Review.
Chairman Barker supported Commissioner Melcher's suggestion. He opened the
public hearing. There was no public testimony, and Chairman Barker closed the
hearing.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, suggested that if the Commission decided that the
City Planner could approve such projects unless there are issues which do not
adequately address the intent of the ordinance, then the reference to Design
Review could be deleted from the first paragraph and the language could be
kept as is.
Mr. Coleman suggested adding wording that any proposal could be referred to
the Design Review Committee by the Grading Committee or City Planner.
Commissioner McNiel feared the intent may not be known by future staff and
only the ordinance is in place. He thought the Design Review Committee has
more latitude than staff to make suggestions and the Committee's suggestions
carry more weight. Me was not comfortable with giving up that leverage.
Planning Commission Minutes
-3-
October 12, 1994
DRAFT
FOR DiSCUSS!ON PURPOSE,2 .C",~
Chairman Barker hated to slow down the process when there are no problems or
concerns.
Commissioner McNiel commented that developments on the hillsides have always
been a source of problems because the vast majority of applicants want to
severely grade the lot and build a large home. Me said there have problems
even with the existence of the ordinance.
Commissioner Lumpp felt all projects should go to Design Review.
Motion:: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the resolution
recommending approval of Development Code Amendment 94-05 as written. Motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
MELCHER
NONE -carried
Commissioner Melcher stated he voted no because he did not believe the
projects should be sent to the Design Review Committee.
NE SINESS
~VELOPMENT REVIEW 94-11 - BERTINO - An appeal of the City anner's
condit~ _as of approval requiring a 25-foot setback on
dedicati0, -. of right-of-way for the entry monument, re of the
driveway aC~, ss, and undergrounding of utilities se 'rig the site as
related to a'.,0 square foot addition to an exist' automotive repair
shop in the GeneS) Industrial District (Subarea 1 f the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, lo~.d on the northwest corn of Vineyard Avenue and
Eighth Street - APN: '-.~7-271-33.
Commissioner h he ther properties
along 8th Street because of the na]';w depth of the lots. He asked if other
parcels along 8th Street have a 2 !etback.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, ed the stai.', rds call for a minimum of 25 feet
and an average of 35 feet landscaping alO ~ the boulevard but the projects
immediately to the west granted a variance_ ~o allow a 25-foot setback.
Commissioner Lump] if the addition has alreau..been built.
Ms. Perez res ed affirmatively.
er replied it is from the ultimate face of curb.
Planning Commission Minutes
-4-
October 12, 1994
76
RESOLUTION NO. 94-79
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-05 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.24,
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for
Development Code Amendment No. 94-05, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code
Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 12th day of October 1994, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on October 12, 1994, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City;
and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on
the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objecnives
of the Development Code; and
PLANNING COnMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DCA 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 12, 1994
Page 2
94-'9
c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared
and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further,
specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a
significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment
is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows:
a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 94-05 to modify the
Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1994.
PLANNI I~IN O ~n~ CITY ~F NCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: ,~ -
rker, Ch
ATTEST:
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of OctoDer 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ORDINANCE N0. j~ ~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
NO. 94-05, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER
17.24, HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for individual single family residences in hillside areas.
This Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. To simplify the review process without compromising the
quality of development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2. On October 12, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above
referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof,
adopted its Resolution No. , recommending that the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt these amendments.
3. On November 16, 1994, the Council conducted and concluded a duly
noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Development
Code.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, welfare, and more
particularly;
1. To implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to
guide and manage the future growth of the City in accordance with such plan;
CiTY COU'NCiL ORDiNaNCE NO.
DCA 94-05 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
November 16, 1994
Page 2
2. To protect the physical, social, and economic stability of
commercial, office, and other land uses within the City to assure its orderly and
beneficial development;
3. To reduce hazards to the public resulting from the inappropriate
location, use, or design of buildings, and other improvements; and
4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages resulting
from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds
that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and further, specifically finds that, based upon substantial
evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is not a possibility that the
proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and
therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15061 (b) (3).
SECTION 4. Section 17.24.020 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 17.2~.020
All projects within a hillside area (8 percent slope or greater),
including but not limited to, parcel maps, tentative tract maps, and site plans
for development review, as well as General Plan and Development District
Amendments, shall be subject to Grading Committee and Desi~m Review
review with approval by the City Planner, or Planning Commission in accordance
with the provisions contained in Sections 17.06.010 and 19.04.060. Additionally,
review by the Grading Committee and Design Revit~C~t~4ttee with approval by the
City Planner or Planning Commission will also be required for other types of
development or grading which meet the criteria specified in Sections 17.24.020A,
B, and C.
City Planner Review. The City Planner shall review all site
development applications and shall impose conditions deemed
appropriate when one or more of the following activities are
proposed.
Natural slopes which are 8 percent or greater but less
than 15 percent on all or part of a subject site, or on
less steep land which may be affected by areas of greater
slope (e.g., flat parcel between or adjacent to steep
hillside).
For fills or excavations equal to or exceeding 3 feet but
less than 5 feet in vertical depth, at their deepest point
measured from the natural ground surface.
CiTY COb~CiL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-05 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
November 16, 1994
Page 3
C o
For excavations or fills, or any combination thereof,
equal to or exceeding 100 cubic yards, but less than 1,500
cubic yards.
Residential construction involving four or less dwelling
units, such as custom homes, regardless of natural slope
or the ~m~t of fill or excavation.
Planning Commission Review. The Planning Commission shall
review site development applications and impose conditions
deemed appropriate when one or more of the following activities
are proposed:
Natural slopes equal to or greater than 15 percent on all
or part of a subject site.
For fills or excavations equal to or exceeding 5 feet in
vertical depth at their deepest point measured from the
natural ground surface.
For excavations or fills, or any combination thereof,
equal to or exceeding 1,500 cubic yards.
Any excavation or fill which will encroach onto or alter
a natural drainage channel or watercourse. (Should be
prohibited unless alternate drainage is provided).
Any other proposal referred to the Planning Commission by
the Grading Committee or City Planner.
Exceptions. Projects which are limited in scope (e.g.,
regarding of yard areas, pool/spa construction, additions to
existing structures and/or construction of accessory structures
which are less than 250 square feet) may be deferred to staff
level review and approval by the City Planner. However,
projects which require grading of large flat areas, including,
but not limited to, such items as tennis courts or riding
rings, shall be reviewed by the City Planner or may be referred
to the Planning Commission if determined necessary by the City
Planner.
Interpretation of Standards. If ambiguity arises concerning
interpretation of the provisions contained in Sections
17.24.010 through 17.24.090, the City Planner shall review to
determine compliance with the provisions contained within the
section or he may refer the matter to the Planning Commission
for consideration.
81
CiTY COU~'CiL ORDiNkNCE NO.
DCA 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
November 16, 1994
Page 4
SECTION 5. PUBLICATION - The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage
at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Novembcr 16, 1994 STAFF REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager
DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS RELATING TO AN ORDINANCE TO PREVENT
CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES
The idea of looking at an ordinance to prevent convenience store robberies
was initiated by the City Council as a result of information presented during
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) training. In this
training session, the convenience store ordinance passed by Gainesville,
Florida was used as an example.
This ordinance was presented to the City Council in July and staff was directed
at that time to work with the Chamber of Commerce, store owners and
representatives to get their comments and feedback on the provisions of the
ordinance. The Planning Division initiated a 90 day period of public
workshops and Planning Commission hearings to consider the proposed
ordinance.
At these workshops and hearings, participants were concerned with the
possibility of a mandatory ordinance. The participants were concerned that
there was not an acute crime problem associated with convenience stores and
any added costs associated with an ordinance would not be justified. Also, some
participants stated that the additional costs associated with additional clerks
and security equipment would be burdensome to store owners. These
comments can be seen in the attachments to this report.
The general feelings of the convenience store owners and other business
representatives was that this ordinance, if adopted, should not be mandatory
and should be a voluntary program with the City providing recommended
guidelines.
With these comments as a background, staff has re-contacted the City of
Gainesville to see how their convenience store crimes have been affected by
the ordinance. Also, staff has compiled our convenience store robbery
statistics since 1990.
Gainesville is a city with a population of 85,000. Since the ordinance was
adopted in 1986, Gainesville has experienced a 79% decrease in convenience
store robberies from 61 in 1986 to 13 in 1993. During this same period, the
number of convenience stores in Gainesville increased by 5 from 42 to 47.
In Rancho Cucamonga the convenience store picture is a little different. We
currently have 29 convenience stores of which 19 have been robbed since
1990. Since 1990, there have been 68 convenience store robberies. During
CITY COUNCIL MEETLNG
OPTIONS FOR PREVENTING CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES
November 16, 1994
Page 2
this same time period, convenience store robberies comprised approximately
7% to 8% of all robberies in the city.
Convenience Store Robberies
20- 18
15
15- 12 13
10
10-
.....
0 I
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
* Note.' 1994 figures are not for full year but are year to date as of 10/31/94.
The convenience store ordinance in Gainesvi!le has definitely had an impact
on convenience store robberies in that community. While Rancho Cucamonga
has not had the same problems with convenience store robberies, the City
Council has expressed interest in preventing crime rather than reacting to
crime. Below are the key provisions of the convenience store ordinance.
Removal of signs posted in windows to provide a clear and
unobstructed view of the cash register and sales area;
Locate sales area so that the clerk and customer arc clearly
visible from the street;
3. Post a conspicuous sign in the window which states:
a)
b)
c)
the cash register has $50 or less,
employee has access to $50 or less, and
a drop-safe or time release safe is maintained in the store;
Parking lots arc to be lit at an intensity of 2-foot candles per
square foot. with a uniformity ratio of no more than 5:1;
Install a security camera of a type and number approved by the
city;
Provide mandatory robbery prevention training to all employees
who work between the hours of 7 PM and 5 AM;
Require two employees be on duty between the hours of 8 PM and
4 A M.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OPTIONS FOR PREVENTING CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES
November 16, 1994
Page 3
After reviewing these provisions and the testimony given by the Chamber of
Commerce and convenience store owners and representatives, the City Council
may wish to include all or some of these provisions in an ordinance or may
wish to table the whole idea. The City Council may wish to make a mandatory
or a voluntary program. Along these lines, representatives of the California
Grocers Association and the Southland Corporation (7-11) have indicated their
willingness to assist in developing voluntary training programs for
convenience stores. These groups have indicated that they want to prevent
robberies as much as the City and want to find a fair and reasonable approach
to this problem.
If the City Council feels that this type of ordinance should be pursued, staff
will follow your direction and return with an ordinance incorporating the
provisions that you have indicated. If it is the preference of the Council to
develop guidelines and voluntary training programs, we will work with the
convenience store industry and the Police Department on developing an
appropriate program.
Respectfully Submitted,
~'u~an~Baker
Assistant to the City Manager
/dab
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Draft Planning Commission Minutes of
September 14, 1994
Exhibit "B" Planning Commission Staff Report of
September 14, 1994
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
F. CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE REGULATIONS ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Review of proposed ordinance.
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. He stated
that the definition of a convenlence store would be expanded to indicate that
it would not exceed 7,500 square feet.
Commissioner Melcher
statistics.
asked for elaboration on the Police Department
Mr. Henderson responded that the Police Department provided an analysis of the
number of occurrences over the last four years, and the number has dropped.
Commissioner Melcher asked if statistics had been prepared to support the
statement in the proposed ordinance that the number of homicides and robberies
at convenience stores exceed the number of such incidents at other
establishments between the hours of 8 p.m. and 4 a.m.
Mr. Henderson replied that is typical nationally. He said the Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department had not supplied those statistics and had
indicated they did not anticipate that it would be that significantly
different from other businesses in the community.
Commissioner Melcher asked if there was an incident or series of incidents
which prompted the City Council to request that an ordinance be prepared.
Brad Bullet, City Planner, said the request was in response to the Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) training which the City
Council artended. He stated that during that training the Gainsville, Florida
ordinance was mentioned and the Mayor requested that staff look at it further
for a possible Rancho Cucamonga City ordinance. He remarked it was felt that
it would be better to be pro-active instead of being reactire. He said it was
felt that convenience stores are more subject to robberies and the City could
possibly address those issues in a pro-active manner.
Commissioner Melcher suggested that a voluntary program be tried to see if it
works.
Chairman Barker noted that the letter from the California Grocers Association
(CGA) advocates a voluntary program.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if the two-person concept came from the Gainsville
ordinance.
Mr. Henderson replied that it did.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if staff had contacted Gainsville to see how it is
working.
Mr. Henderson responded that the City had not contacted Gainsville, but the
Planning Commission Minutes -11- September 14, 1994
C R,'X FT
1 pUR.o SE5 C'~':LY
Chamber of Commerce indicated they had contacted Gainsville.
Mr. Buller said that they were informed there was a reduction in crime but
also in the number of convenience stores, particularly the Mom-and-Pop
stores. He said many of the smaller stores moved out of the area.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if the ordinance would become effective immediately
upon adoption.
Mr. Bullet replied that the ordinance is elmply a draft ordinance as the City
Council had asked that staff prepare a draft ordinance based on the Gainsville
ordinance with community input. He said, as drafted, the effective date would
be immediately; however, it could be modified so that existing businesses
could be grandfathered with compliance to be achieved within a period of
time--i.e., one year, two years, five years. He also said the City Attorney
had suggested we f~rther clarify the definition of a convenience store and
perhaps square footage should be considered. He said staff then researched it
and found that 7,500 square feet would include most convenience stores but not
grocery stores or large markets.
Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that the ordinance as presently
drafted is not a zoning ordinance and would be a presently effective business
regulation unless revised.
Chairman Barker invited public comment.
Gary Christian, president of Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, 8280 Utica
Avenue, Suite 160, Rancho Cucamonga, noted that in their conversations with
Gainsville they were informed that although crime went down in convenience
stores, residential burglaries increased and he felt the issue of shifting of
crime should be considered. He agreed the proposed ordinance includes some
good ideas and businesses should be encouraged to implement them, as they are
by Southland Corporation and the CGA. He observed that the CGA letter cited
three studies indicating that one clerk vs. two clerks is not statistically
significant in reducing crime and that crime in convenience stores is being
reduced nationally. He noted that Money Magazine had recently stated that
Rancho Cucamonga is the llth safest City with populations over 100,000 in the
United States. He said business people already take steps to protect
themselves and their employees and customers. He also felt it would be
difficult to enforce such an ordinance. He said the Police Department had
remarked that it goes out and discusses crime prevention measures whenever
requested to do so by the business owner. He thought it would not be
reasonable to have the Police Department checking to make sure that businesses
have two employees and not more than $50 in the register. He offered the
services of the Chamber of Commerce to do whatever they can to help the
convenience stores but he felt there is not a problem. Me provided a copy of
Police Department summary of convenience store statistics, which indicated
that larceny and violent crimes at convenience stores had generally decreased
over the last four years. He noted that a few stores still could use some
help.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if the Chamber of Commerce was recommending that an
Planning Commission Minutes -12- September 14, 1994
FOR D:~CU<2S~ON FURFCSES ONLY
ordinance not be adopted.
Mr. Christian replied that an ordinance encouraging steps may be acceptable
but he indicated likely opposition to an ordinance mandating steps.
Commissioner Melcher noted that some of the requirements in the ordinance deal
with CPTED issues, primarily visibility into the store, of the cashier, and
customer, etc. He asked if the Chamber objected to those issues, or only
requiring more employees and security cameras.
Mr. Christian replied that was correct. He noted that the Sign Ordinance
deals with the issue of signs blocking visibility into the store but he noted
it does not cover the issue of stacked boxes blocking that visibility. He
felt that boxes should not block visibility from the standpoint of good
business sense. Me agreed it does help to have good visibility into the
store.
Commissioner Melcher thought that such provisions would not significantly
impact business and do make sense. Me felt some of the other provisions do
not seem appropriate for the community.
Mr. Christian asked if the next step would be to require that every automobile
in the City have a club and all residences have a guard dog. He said he
understood that the government wants to protect its citizens, but he thought
there is currently not a problem and the measures go too far. He thought the
Police Department should be commended for the job they do.
Commissioner Lumpp felt that Rancho Cucamonga is a safe City because the City
Council and the Planning Commission have not developed programs in a
reactionary mode, but rather in a positive, pro-active sense. Me thought this
ordinance was an attempt to be pro-active. Me supported the idea but did not
think all of the provisions apply. He thought that adding an additional clerk
would not stop a robbery. He questioned if convenience stores could not have
a panic button which connects to the Police Department in lieu of two people
or a security camera.
Mr. Christian said that may lead to false alarms.
Art Perez, Loss Prevention Manager for Southland Corporation, 120 South State
College Boulevard, Brea, indicated he has approximately 22 years experience in
law enforcement and retail. He provided a copy of materials they use in the
Robbery/Violence Prevention training. He offered his services to assist in
helping draft an ordinance. He said the latest FBI report has shown a double-
digit drop in robberies in the convenience industry while fast food businesses
and banks are showing an increase. He stated that Southland utilizes two
clerks where it is economically feasible and they are trying to install a
camera system in each of their 1,200 stores as time goes by. Me observed
their camera system utilizes a color monitor on which patrons can see
themselves. He reported when they installed such equipment, crime took a 70
percent drop, but he noted it is a very expensive system. Me said they also
have a hold up button which is tied to a security company which dispatches the
Police. Because 7-11 stores are already slated to get such equipment, he felt
Planning Commission Minutes -13-
'-'.'-~ "':C'jj~fCr4 i:LS.RFC~E:3 ONLY
September 14, 1994
the ordinance would probably not cause a severe impact on those stores;
however, he felt it could be too large of a burden on the small independent
stores. Me said there are other ~hings which can be done such as training and
providing clear visibility into the store with reduced signage and low
aisles. He said he is currently working with several police departments to
help them establish programs. He saLd they also offer their services to other
companies.
Commissioner Lumpp asked how they feel about the panic button.
Mr. Perez replied they are comfortable with the buttons but they educate their
people not to push the button until after the robbery has occurred. He said
they try to prevent robberies but if one occurs, they want the person out as
soon as possible.
Chairman Barker observed that there are no or minimal costs associated with
some of the ideas while others are cost items--such as two persons, drop or
time-release safes, and security cameras. He felt that it is illogical for a
store to block visibility with window signs or stacks or boxes.
Commissioner Melcher noted such cluttering signs are more commonly found on
small independent stores.
Chairman Barker commented that 7-11 already has a major crime prevention
program. Me said small independent stores do not have such a program and may
put themselves at risk by trying to cram in extra advertising or extra storage
space. He thought that is not a cost item but he questioned how far the City
wants to go in regulating them. He was not comfortable with mandating a
policy that only $50 be available at one time because of enforcement
problems. He felt the City should try to help prevent occurrences rather than
being reactire.
Commissioner Lumpp felt that additional lighting could potentially be a cost
item as well.
Chairman Barker noted there are current regulations regarding lighting.
asked if that provision would mean additional costs for businesses.
He
Mr. Bullet replied that it might entail additional costs for those locations
which were developed under the County standards prior to City incorporation.
He thought the Planning Commission may wish to recommend that the more costly
items be phased in. He said the ordinance could perhaps cover those items
which are no or low cost and the City could conduct workshops and assist in
training in crime prevention. He noted that Southland Corporation has offered
their assistance and the Police Department has offered to meet with the
businesses independently to go over crLme prevention ideas.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if the Police Department supports the proposed
ordinance.
Mr. Bullet replied that the Police Department was at the workshop to assist
and provided some of the data. He said they are supportive of any City
Planning Commission Minutes -14- September 14, 1994
FCR ~'ISC'jGS.C,~i :~U2~CGE,~
Council direction to reduce crime but they have not taken a position of
recommending for or against any of the specific elements of this ordinance.
Chairman Barker felt lighting should be improved to current standards, even if
there are costs involved, as he thought that is a cost of doing business. He
thought lighting by itself is a deterrent and lighting should be improved
immediately where necessary. He felt securlty cameras are becoming
increasingly reasonable and perhaps they should be strongly recommended rather
than a requirement. He thought some of the items could be strongly
recommended while others could be phased in. He felt it makes good business
sense for small independent stores to not have more than $50 cash available
but he questioned if the City could legally mandate that no more than $50 be
available.
Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, suggested it could be a business license
regulation, but enforcement would be unfeasible.
Mr. Bullet observed that comments were made at the workshop that it would take
an enormous amount of staff time and resources to enforce every aspect of the
ordinance. He said some community representatives asked who would pay
associated costs and the City Council should address that issue.
Commissioner Melcher stated he would like to see requirements for two people
and the security camera changed to recommendations.
Chairman Barker felt the City could make a suggestion that no more than $50 in
cash be available and that a sign to that effect be posted, but he felt it
would be too difficult to enforce. He questioned if the City can require a
drop-safe or time-release safe.
Commissioner Melcher felt that lighting should be upgraded where needed
immediately. He noted that the proposed ordinance requires employee training
in a course given by the Police Department or certified by the City and he
asked if any courses have been certified.
Mr. Bullet replied none are presently certified but staff felt that courses
such as Southland's training would probably be acceptable.
Commissioner Melcher felt uncomfortable with requiring people to take a City
program and then charging for the program. He wanted to be sure there is an
alternative available. Me did not want to give the appearance of the City
setting up a monopoly.
Mr. Bullet said staff's intent was that employees working during evening hours
receive some training. He was aware that Southland Corporation offers courses
and said staff could work on how to certify such courses.
Chairman Barker agreed the City should not be the only prorider.
Commissioner Lumpp recommended that the requirements for two people, a
security camera, drop-safe or time-release safe, limitation to $50 cash, and
training be eliminated.
Planning Commission Minutes -15- September 14, 1994
Chairman Barker asked if the requirement to post a sign in the window stating
that no more than $50 cash is available zo employees should be removed because
it may be requiring store owners to lie.
Commissioner Lumpp felt that some of the ideas are good but would be too tough
to enforce.
Chairman Barker suggested that those items be recommendations but not
requirements.
Planning Commission Minutes -16- September 14, 1994
91
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
September 14, 1994
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Bullet, City Planner
Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE REGULATIONS ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA - Review of proposed ordinance.
STAFF REPORT
BACKGROUND: This report is an update on the progress and schedule for the
Council-requested Convenience Food Store Ordinance based on Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts. Staff is seeking the Planning
Commission's input on the draft Ordinance and the points raised at the
August 23, 1994, City/Chamber workshop which are highlighted below.
At the City Council meeting on July 6, 1994, the City Council requested that
within 90 days, City staff work with the Chamber of Con~nerce and the Planning
Commission on developing an ordinance based upon CPTED principals and
patterned after the Gainsville, Florida Ordinance. A copy of the schedule,
summary of the ordinance provisions, and the draft ordinance are provided for
reference.
A City/Chamber of Commerce Community Workshop to discuss the draft ordinance
was held on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, at 3:30 p.m. in the Tri-Communities Room
of the Civic Center. All the affected stores and their owners were notified,
as well as the California Grocers Association (CGA). The highlights were as
follows:
Approximately 4 of the 23 convenience store owners artended along with
representatives from Southland Corporation and the CGA and three board
members from the Chamber of Co~erce.
A majority of the attendees indicated that they felt a mandatory program
would place unfunded mandates on the owners and lead to some businesses
failing. Costs quoted included $25,000 per year in payroll costs to
require a second employee after 8 p.m. and $5,000 to $7,000 for black and
white camcorder equipment.
Concerns were also raised with who would handle enforcement; what level of
enforcement would be taken; and what, if any, penalties there would be.
Some concerns were expressed over the costs for the enforcement program.
4. Some pointed out that Police Department figures currently indicate that
there is no acute problem with convenience stores at this time.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
FOOD CONV. STORE ORDINANCE - CITY OF R.C.
September 14, 1994
Page 2
The CGA recommended a voluntary outreach and education program be
consldered instead of an ordinance. A copy of the CGA correspondence ~s
attached for reference. The Chamber of Commerce indicated their
willingness to assist in a voluntary outreach and education program.
Staff indicated that the PlannXng Commission would review the Ordinance in
at their meeting on September 14, 1994. It was also noted that staff has
tentatively set October 5, 1994, for City Council to hear the matter.
Staff requests that the Planning Con~nission receive testimony from all
~nterested persons, discuss the issues relative to the proposed ordinance, and
forward any comments or recommendatlons to the City Council.
Res~Respectf ly submitted,
BB:LJH/jfs
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Schedule
Exhibit "B" - Letter and Attachments dated August 22, 1994
from the California Grocers Association
Exhibit "C" - Revised Draft Ordinance
CPTED CONVIENCE STORE ORDINANCE
SCHEDULE
7/3- 7110- 7/17- 7/24- 7/31- 8/7-
7/9 7/16 7123 7/30 8/6 8/13
7/6
CC
REQUE-
ST (90
DAYS)
8/14- 8/21- 8/28- 9/4- 9/11- 9/1
8/20 8/27 9/3 9/10 9/17 9/
8/8
FOLLOW
UP
INTER.
DEPT.
MTG.
7/19
MTG.
NOTI -
FIC.
SENT
TO
DEPT. S CON-
TENT
7/25 8/3 8/10 8/4
PRELIM FINAL DRAFT STAFF
STAFF SCNED. ORDIN. MTG.
MTG.RE APPROV DISTR- W/
SCNED. & BUTE CHAM-
& ROUTED TO BER
BER
8/23 9/14
COMMU- PC MTG
NITY
WORK-
SHOP
8/15 9/15
PC AGENDA CC MTG
SET ] NOTIF.
DEADLINE
8- 9/25- 10/2-
24 10/1 10/8
lo/~
CC MTC
1ST RD
SCHEDULE NOTES: Schedule reflects optimum number of days. As can be seen the PC mtg. is set before
Community workshop is even held. Likewise the PC Mtg. is at the same time as the CC advertising
deadline. This schedule is very optimistic and may need to change. It assumes we will present an
Ordinance for both Commission and Council action on 9/14 and 10/5. If this schedule can not be met,
will, at a minimum, tentatively schedule a City Council stausd report for the October 5th meeting.
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES SECURITY ,MEASURES ORDINANCE
(CFSSMO)
PURPOSE:
TO MINMIZE OR ELIMINATE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF
POTENTIAL INCIDENTS OF HOMICIDE AND/OR ROBBERY AT
CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES.
SU.'~MARY OF ORDLN'ANC'E REGUI-ATIONS:
1. TWO EMPLOYEES BETWEEN 8 PM AND 4 AM.
2, WINDOWS ARE TO BE IF_!~ 0-F--M~ AND UNOBSTRUCrED, IN ORDER
TO PROVIDE A VIEW OF THE CASH REGISTER AND SALES AREA F'ROM
THE STREET AND/OR PUBLIC PARKING AREA,
3. SAI-F-S AREA TO BE LOCATED SO THAT THE Cl-!::RK AND CUSTOMER
ARE FULLY VISIBLE FORM THE STREET AND/OR PUBLIC PARKING
AREA AT THE TIME OF SALES TRANSACTION.
4. POST A CONSPICIOUS SIGN WHICH STATES $50.00 OR LESS IN
REGISTER.
5. NO MORE THAN $50.00 CASH READILY AVAILABLE TO
EMPLOYEES.
6. MAINTAIN A DROP-SAFE OR TIME RELEASE SAFE BOLTED OR
INSTALLED IN THE FLOOR, OR WEIGHING AT LEAST 500 POUNDS.
7. CUSTOMER PARKING AREA MUST BE ILLUMINATED DURING ALL
HOURS OF DARKNF.~.
8. PROVIDE SECURITY CAMCORDER AT AI .I, TIMES.
9. OWNER OR EMPLOYEES WORKING BETWEEN 7 PM AND 5 AM
SHA[ .I. COMPLETE A COURSE IN ROBBERY PREVENTION THROUGH THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA POUCE DEPARTMFNT.
California Grocers Association
-27R,'~NC iH~ FGOr, :'~r.~,~-r'~y t~r; C..k.L.:I-~.~'NI'~ k.r..:.-~ :.5" .~
August 22. 1994
Mr. Dave Barker
President. Plannmg Commission
City of Ranebb Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730
VIA FAX
Dear Commissioner Barker:
This letter is in response to the proposed ordinance which would create
Chapter 9.28 of the Ranebb Cucamonga Municipal Code regulating
convenience stores.
The California Grocers Association/California .Association of Neighborhood
Stores. which represents more than 8,000 members including supermarket
chain stores. mid-size independent grocers and small neighborhood stores.
shares many of your concerns regarding convenience stores and the potenttal
for their and robbery. In fact. we have always taken a pro-acti,.'e ,,lance on
this issues and have instituted voluntary. programs such as our NeiGhborhood
Outreach Program to foster communication and cooperation between retail
grocers. local goverrunent. law enforcement and the com.munity.
As you will note on the enclosed booklet. many of the suggestions
encompassed in the proposed ordinance are addressed by this program. In
fact. ~.e offer many more operational standards as ~,'ell as much needed
guidelines for alcohol and tobacco sales. crime awareness. and commurUt~'
involvement. We also provide an 800 number which serves as a clearmghous~
for both the stores and the community to help solve concerns before they
become major problems. We hope that the City would chose to pamcipate m
this program.
Regarding the operational guideLioes outlined in the proposed ordina,ce. v.-e
cannot support a requirement that stores hue additional staff nor can we
support the mandatory install-',uon of security systems. Such requirements
unduly penalize the neighborhood store by increasing the cost of doing
business and therefore jeopardizing their ability to compete with other stores.
Addiuonal personnel and expensive security systen'n will not deter a criminal
from an already senseless act.
/ E ,, r
The installation of vide{} cameras would require storc~ to purchase video
cameras u.'~th an est~matetd cost of ~10.000 each. Additional c¢..st.s would
include instaJAatmrk .."n, alntcnance. monthl,, ~ervzce fees and u~e trairung.
Depending upon the size. some stores coul~ reqmre ~nultiple cameras.
.4/1 this. when there is no evidence to show' tj~at video cameras are effective
~n deter~ng cnrrunal beha,dor much less held with criminal apprehension.
While there is on. iv !irnited data on appredension. figures frorr, the Los
Angeles Police Department show that less than half of the suspects captured
i, L.A. bank robberies last year were apprehended through the use of
surveillance cameras. In fact. despite the mandated use of cameras in banks.
264 suspects were never caught.
Furthermo~'e. three studies comm.tssioned by the National Association of
Convenience Stores found that 1) over 80,,c7'c of all U.S. convenience stores are
robbery free and 2) that one clerk vs. two clerks was not statistically
s~gnificant on robbery rate reduction. A.nd. in.t.'ormation re[eased by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in late 1993 reported that con,,'e~ience
stores had outpaced all other categories recorded in reducing the incidence
of robbery (see attachment).
We hope that you will share our thoughts w/th the Plarmi. ng Commission.
Please don't hesitate to call me at 310/432-8610 if you have further questions
or concerns. We stand ready to work with the city of Rancho Cucamonga to
find a fair and reasonable approach to this difficult problem.
Sincerely.
CALIFORNIA GROCERS ASSOCIATION
BETH BEEMAN
Director of City/County
Goverm'nental Relations
Enclosures
CO:
City Council
City Planner
NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM
OPERATIONAL POLICY
As a member of the CaLifornia Associanon of Neighborhood Stores (CANS) and participant in the
Neighborhood Outr~ach Program, the undersigned ag'r~s to strictly axeeat and take all masonable
action n~essary to ensure complianc~ wiffi these standards.
1. T'ne Neighborhood Oum:ach Program memlxa- clr. cal must be placed on the front door in di=ct
view of custornen entering the store.
Every reasonable means must be used to eliminate wh~re nec~ loin=trig on store prolxn-W
including parking lots to work with local law enforcement, includinglaosting "No Loitering' signs.
Best efforts must be used to k~p al.l store property, parking lots and any adjacent property clean
a~d fr~e of customexs' litmr.
Parking lot must have adr. quat~ ligh~ng according to building cod~
replaced as needed.
Train employees to pass Neighborhood Outroach Program pwviclcd or equivalent company
provided test so they fttHy understand and can enforce state laws and regaladorn r~ga.-din g the sate
of alcohol and tobacco. Stor~ must utilizz the in-stor~decs. lsl:n. ovidedby NeighborhoodOuu, each
Pz'ognm (or equivalent company lm:wid~i ctecals) regarding alcohol and tobacco sales to minon.
Employees will be trained in ~rne awa.~ness te, chniqucs and provid~ with the mamtiah
r'-ecessary for crime awaz~ncss.
SU*ictly prohibit the use or sale of Ulegal substances on store prope. z~ including parIcing lots. To
cLiscouragc sates or naz=odcs on szore property and w~l be mpo~ t~l to authorities, All oreside pay
telephones should be switched by rolephone company to accOrnrr~c~a~_, ou~oing calls only.
No~ more than on third (1/3) of front windows can be covered with signage. W'mdows near
s a 1= s counter and entrance doors must remain clear of signage. For s~cttrity purpose, s, a c lear view
of the ston: should be visible from the su'eet and paddng lot. In order to improve community
relations and the appeannce of your store, beer and tobacco product signs should not be over used,
so that your customers and the community do not have the impreSSiOn that you a.~ only intn'~st~d
in selling beer and tobacco Froducu. No neon signs advertisin gpro<tucts can be placed in windows
o~ doors.
Display all Fedenl, State, County and City signs thaz are required by law. They ate listed in the
Program Signage Section of this manual.
I0.
11.
All banns hung outside the scot: should be rotated or changed and cle~cd
r~commendadons arc as follows:
Loue~ B~ners - change as necessazy
Gr-~nd OpenLngs - change within 30 days
New Management - change within 30 days
McnrJ'dy Specials - cha, nge every 30 days
Ptnna, n=s - change every 30 days
and the
Mainraln a close working reladonsMp with local law enforcement agencies and local coutrntmi ty
orian/udons,
FOR MORE INFORxMATION, CAI,L 1-800-794-3545
DEP.~,RTML',FT OF
POLZC]E
CiTY OF SACR-~IENTO
C.u.J FO &'q rA
R~ 4-20
~t~ ~IXTH STrEeT
~.~CP, A.~tENTC. CA
Chuck Beaver, D/honor
Califorrda Grocers A.ss~c~ation
906 O Street., Suite 700
Sacr~,me:::o. CA 9~814
Dear ,Mr. Beaver,
We have reviewed the materials a.uoc/ar~d with the United Neighborhood Outreach
Program which/s being spousored by u~e California Assocation of Neighbortmod Stores. I
am ve,,'y pleased m see the Assoc/ation initiating such a positive program aimed at reducing
beth :he real and the perceived problem a-s,socmmd with convenenee s'torts.
Implementing su:ps such as thc~ wtlined in ~e proFaro will not omy raprave the
real ~g~r of ~e ~a: ~e~ employees ~ on a ~y ~
The Sacrmzento Police Department is Fle-a~d :o n.,pport ~ ping-am. and I
hav~ a r~.vre~enrative present at your ,May 1st kick-ofl~ If we may be of any fiather
assisrlnce your crime pnvention effor~ please contact our Commumty Resources Seenon
at '~9-5731,
Chief of Police
100
Robber)-
Five Year A-naly'sis
( 1988 Base Year)
~'L'2.2 'Je,5~c.~7 2~:~e ~eccns
:~"~'iI ""'f"=L~ t~ eS )a ~
Convc~dence Store
25
.2c
15
la~e2.
~g?2' I
i!~rnk RohD eAt'
'-: ---- -' . ...............101
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.28 TO TME
RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS
PERTAINING TO CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES.
WHEREAS, the number of homicides and robberies at Convenience Food
Stores exceed the number of such incidents at other establishments between the
hours of 8 p.m. and 4 a.m.; and
WHEREAS, such excess demonstrates a greater likelihood that such
incidents will occur unless precautionary measures are taken at Convenience
Food Stores; and
WHEREAS, the occurrence of such incidents may result in loss of life
and/or property and is contrary to the public health and safety and the
welfare of the employees and customers of Convenience Food Stores; and
WHEREAS, these regulations provide essential requirements that will
minimize or eliminate a significant number of incidents of homicide and/or
robbery at Convenience Food Stores; and
WHEREAS, on August 23, 1994, a public workshop was conducted to
obtain public input; and
WHEREAS, on , 1994, the City Council conducted and
concluded a duly noticed pubic hearing concerning the subject amendment to the
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance has occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California:
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to
add a new Chapter 9.28, to read, in words and figures, as follows:
Chapter 9.28
CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES.
Sections:
9.28.010 Definitions.
9.28.020 Regulations.
9.28.010 Definitions. The following terms and phrases, when
used in this Chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
this Section, except where the context clearly indicates a different
meaning:
102
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES - CITY OF R.C.
1994
Page 2
A. "Convenience Food Store" is a business establishment that:
1. Derives 50 percent or more of its gross income,
excluding motor fuels, from the sale of goods, merchandise, or other
articles of value in their original containers; and
2. Offers a limited quantity and variety of food,
household, and sundry items; and
4 a.m.; and
Operates at any time between the hours of 8 p.m. and
Does not sell or have for sale prescription drug
items·
B. "Owner" is the person, corporation, partnership, joint
venture, or other group enterprise having lawful possession of the
premises upon which the Convenience Food Store is operated.
C. "Employee" is the person, corporation, partnership, joint
venture, or group enterprise legally responsible for the day-to-day
operation of the Convenience Store.
9.28.020 ReGulations. All Convenience Food Stores shall comply
with the following regulatXons:
A. If open for business after 8 p.m., the Convenience Food
Store must employ two persons continuously on duty on the premises
from 8 p.m. until closing or 4 a.m., whichever event occurs first.
B. Locate any signs posted in the windows so as to provide a
clear and unobstructed view of the cash register and sales area from
the street.
C. Locate the sales area so that the clerk and customer are
fully visible from the street at the time of the sales transaction.
D. Post a conspicuous sign, not exceeding 2 square feet in
area, in the window which states the cash register has $50.00 cash or
less in it.
E. Have no more than $50.00 cash available and readily
accessible to employees.
F. Maintain a drop-safe or time release safe at the
Convenience Food Store which is bolted to the floor or installed in
the floor'or weighs at least 500 pounds.
G. Post a conspicuous sign, not exceeding 2 square feet in
area, in the window which states that there is a safe at the store
and it is not accessible to the employees.
103
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES - CITY OF R.C.
1994
Page 3
H. The entire area of the parking lot area utilized by
customers of the Convenience Food Store must be lighted during all
hours of darkness when the employees and/or customers are on the
premises as follows:
1. Minimum average maintained iltuminance must be two
foot candles or greater wXth a unlformlty ratio (average to minimum)
of no more than 5:1.
2. Additionally, all such lighting shall be in accordance
with the applicable City's Lighting Code requirements, and shall be
verified through the submittal of a detailed lighting plan to the
Planning Commission and the Crime Prevention Bureau of the Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department.
I. Install a security camera of a type and number approved by
the City Manager or his designee. Said camera must De capable of
producing a retrievable image on film or tape that can be made a
permanent record and that can be enlarged through projection or other
means. Cameras meeting the requirements of this section shall be
maintained in proper working order at all times and shall be subject
to periodic inspection by the City Manager or his designee.
J. Any owner or employee who works between the hours of 7 p.m.
and 5 a.m. at a Convenience Food Store shall complete a course in
Robbery Prevention to be given by the Rancho Cucamonga Police
Department, or a program certified by the City Manager or his
designee, within 30 days after he or she begins employment. If the
Rancho Cucamonga Police Department's Robbery Prevention course is
utilized, the City Manager or his designee shall determine the cost
of training per employee to the City and the Convenience Food Store
shall pay the cost to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department prior to
the training of the employee.
SECTION 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or
portion of this Ordinance is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or other
portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
Shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least
once in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
104
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
November 7, 1994
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Charles J. Buquet II, Mayor Pro Tem
Rick Gomez, Community Development Director
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE REGIONAL
COMPRHEHENSIVE PLAN (RCP) IN ITS CURRENT FORM
The Planning Commission will consider the attached draft Resolution opposing the
Regional Comprehensive Plan in its current form at its Wednesday, November 9, 1994
meeting. Because the City Council agendas will be run on Wednesday, November 9,
1994, the draft Resolution was placed in the City Council agenda for the Councirs
consideration. If there are any changes to the draft Resolution or for some reason it was
not approved by the Planning Commission, staff will advise the Council at the November
16, 1994 City Council meeting otherwise it is recommended the Council approve
Resolution 94-*.
Respectfully Sub '
/ c,
Director
1
AIachment: Draft Resolution 94-*
105
RESOLUTION NO.
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THE REGIONAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE OPPOSED IN ITS CURRENT FORM AND BE
RENAMED THE REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE REPORT.
WHEREAS, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region
contains 188 cities and the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, San
Bernardino, Riverside, and Imperial; and
WHEREAS, SCAG is designated by State and Federal Statutes as the
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the purposes of regional
transportation planning; and
WHEREAS, SCAG prepares a Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) to address
numerous issues within the SCAG region; and
WHEREAS, SCAG is required to prepare a transportation (Regional Mobility
Element) and Growth Management Plan to comply with State and Federal
requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Element and the Growth Management Plan are
included in the RCP as mandatory chapters; and
WHEREAS, the remaining chapters of the RCP are advisory to local
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the Commission is concerned that combining the mandatory and
advisory elements in the same document will result in all elements becoming
mandatory on local jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the RCP contains insufficient controls to ensure consistent
decision-making by local jurisdictions should the advisory elements become
mandatory.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that
the Regional Comprehensive Plan be opposed in its current form and be renamed the
Regional Comprehensive Report in order to ensure proper emphasis of the advisory
chapters contained in the document and object to its contents in its present
form.
WHEREAS, the Secretary of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF R3~NCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
106
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
November 9, 1994
Page 2
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day
of November 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
107
Dam:
To:
No~mber 16, 1994
Rancho Cu~amonga Fire Protection District Board
President Stout
Vice-Presidgnt Buquet
Board Mmbers Alexander, W'dliams, and Guticrrez
From: Jim Frost
City Treasurer
Subject: Proposed Resolution FD 94-010 and draft 1994 / 1995 Memorandum of
Understanding
The proposcd MOU, made availablc to mc just this wcck, raises several areas for comment, concern,
and for recommendations which future Board Members may wish to consider.
It is my understanding, at this time, that we are approaching closure between the District and the
fire~ghter's union. If the Board wishes to adopt Resolution FD 94-010 as presented, it will be the
ending of a lengthy. phase of labor negotiations, and perhaps the beginning of yet another. Therefore,
with agreement from the union, adoption of tonight's resolution may be a way to let you all go on with
your lives, until a new Board is in place.
Next month, public perception of the Dislrict Board will change; we'll have a fire captain as President
(ff his peers choose to have the mayor sit as president), and the father of a firefighter on the new
board. But the goals of the District will be to continue operation in a business - like manner;
responsible to the citizens who provide support for its operation.
The first City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, in executive sessions in 1979 and thereafter, directed
the City Manager to survey selected cities, and to set our salary steps slightly above the average of the
whole. Our intent was to treat our staff fairly, within budgetary constraints, to provide competitive
benefits, and to provide the flexibility to adapt to changing financial times. Our desire was to
acknowledge staff professionalism, and to discourage valuable employees from being seduced by other
employers in the job market. Informal employee organizations were formed in order to provide input
into labor relation decisions by the council, and to avoid the formation of more formal employee
groupings.
When your current MOU included language regarding the philosophy of a survey salary average plus
5%, I think you feb victim to faulty legal advice. I hope you're not using the same attomey, but I
commend you for having altered the language and for acknowledging the error. That prior advice has
cost $600,000 in retroactive salary payments of taxpayer money which was reserved for operations or
equipment replacement; plus $300,000 in annual pa.vroll increases, lasting forever, and compounded
by all future cost of living and step increases.
I also have the following suggested changes or comments for the draft MOU.
Page 6; Section 2(A), Salary Ranges.
page 1
Page 13; -qectian 3(12})3, av~titn~ PaY.
Snell out "Jxtiurlt Time" instead of "I-Time." There isn't a rfference to "I-Time" am, where else in the
document.
Page 16; Section 5(A)(1)b, Health Insurance.
The District provides employee and family health insurance to current retirees, and those who are
currently employed, and those current full-time employees who retire from the District in the future.
Comments: l) There is no reference to length of service to the District. Someone with prior
PERS service could be hired yesterday, put in for retirement tomorrow, and have fully paid health
insurance for the rest of his or her life. I suggest minimum length of sentice; five years, ten years, ...
whatever.
2) There is no cap to the premium paid, nor reference to the type of plan
provided. What protection does the DisWict have against future rate increases? Do we provide only
the least expensive plan available to other employees? And do we require conversion to Medicare
Supplementary insurance ff the employee becomes eligible?
Page 16; Section 5(A)(1)c, Health Insurance.
New full-time hires are provided the least expensive plan.
Comments: 1 ) The District should also provide a monetary cap, so that rate increases arc not
automatically. picked up by the DiStrict.
2) The employee should be able to have a more expensive plan, if willing to pay
the cost difference. Perhaps they already have that option, which may bc stated in carrier contracts.
Page 16; Section 5(A)(1)d, Health Insurance.
New full - time hires "shall be responsible" for picking up the cost of insurance upon retirement.
Comments: 1) Isn't this discretionary? Language should state that insurance is available
through the District, at employee cost, ff they chose to participate.
Page 16; Section 5(A)(1)c, Health Insurance.
Provides for cash compensation in lieu of medical benefits if the employees spouse and / or family
"can" provide full health insurance.
Comments: 1) This leaves the door open for the employee to take the cash and be uninsured.
I would suggest that it read that the spouse and / or family "will" provide health insurance.
page 2
Page 16; Section 5(A)(2)a, Dental Insurance.
Vision insurance provides for a dollar cap to the coverage provided, I would suggest that a cap also be
placexl on the amount of dental premium paid by the District
Page 18; Section 6(A), Tuition Reimbursement
Tuition reimbursement must be obtained by the employee's supervisor prior to taking a come. I
would suggest that a "bigher authority" be required along with the supervisor's blessing. This protects
the District from a supervisor who may be too lenient, and protects the employee from a supervisor
who may be too restrictive.
Page 20; Section 8; Work Rehted Injuries.
States that "All management and non-management, non-safety and safety Fire District employees arc
entitled to their full salary and benefits...", then goes on to say that non-safety arc not "enti~cd" to the
benefits, but that they are provided anyway. The should be a better clarification of the issue.
As an additional comment,. before we leave the issue, perhaps the District may wish to state its
matentity and paternity leave policy, even though it apparently coincides with federal law. Your staff
will probably be more aware of theft' rights if they are stated in the MOU.
To summarize; passage of Resolution FD 94-010 and adoption of the MOU without alteration appears
to be an appropriate action. ff the Board wishes to defer adoption to a future date, then I would
strongly suggest that the above comments be considered for inclusion into the MOU.
CC:
File: FireDept
Jack Lam
Bob Dominguez
page 3
I ancho Cucamonga
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Date:
November 16, 1994
President and Members of the Fire Board
From: Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce
Subject:
Resolution FD 94-010
In regards to the issue of implementation of a Memorandum of Understanding between
the Rancho Cucamonga FIre Protection Diswict and Union Local 2274. This is an issue
that the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce would prefer to not have to comment
on. It appears primarily to be a labor negotiation dispute. However, because of the
potential for future impact on the District and City's budgets and dependency on the
Utility Tax, which we have, and continue to oppose, we feel it is necessary to provide our
input.
When passed, the Utility Tax defined $2.5M for the Fire District based on potential State
take-aways at that time. No Utility Tax moneys were ever promised to the District for
augmentation or salary increases, only to back fill State take-aways and maintain cttrrent
level of service. These Fire Diswict take-aways never occurred. If the City is not a careful
fiscal manager, the Utility Tax funds may be diverted to purposes for which they were
never intended. If the Utility Tax is going to be diverted specifically to fund a special
district then it is our opinion that this tax would become a special tax subject to a vote by
the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga.
After preliminary review of the District's and the Union' s positions, the District's proposal
appears to be composed of more sound fiscal practices to fulfill the contractual obligations
of the two entities.
We strongly encourage finding ways to allow management to manage their departments,
and maximize their resources to the community. The Union, of cotuse, has the same goal,
however;, the Union's calculation of how to riseally manage the resources are tenuous at
best.
8250 U*':CA ,=VE',J L'E. SUITE 160 · RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA 9173C · 909 987-~ 012
The glaring fault we find in the Union's position is the assumption of future availability of
funds through QUOTE "growth of the assessed valuation in the city" UN~2UOTE. It is
evident through recent notifications from the County Tax Assessor, that at this time
property values, and therefore, property taxes are declining, not increasing. As I
mentioned earlier, the Chamber opposes any revenue transfer from the Utility Tax funds
/{or from any other City funds to make up any deficit in the Fire District
In today's fiscal environment, fire protection resources must be used morn effectively to
meet the community 's needs. The District and its management must have the flexibility to
manage and deploy resources to meet the community's needs. Any new agreement must
not reflect outdated work roles and union work requirements that are out of step with the
flexible management philosophy consistent with "reinventing" government to meet the
challenges of the 1990's. Because the way that the Districts proposal addresses issues
involving fiscal realities, it is apparent to us that the District's proposal reflects more
closely what is going on in our businesses and residences, given the California economy.
Quite simply put, the Chamber of Commerce is suggesting that the District have a
Memorandum of Understanding in place that allows the management of the Fire District
to conu'ol resources and provide fiscal responsibility to the degree that the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District continues to provide world class fire service in the
most cost effective manner. We urge you to vote in favor of Resolution FD 94-010, as
proposed by staff.
Respectfully ~ub ;.,.milled,
Gary C{~istian,
President
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 14, 1994
TO~
FROM:
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Directo~~
SUBJECT: CHANGE TO RESOLUTION FD 94-010
Our labor attorney, Steve Filarsky, has reviewed Resolution FD 94-010, and has suggested changes
to items 1 and 2. Please replace Resolution FD94-010 in your agenda packet with the attached
revised resolution.
RCD/dah
attachment
RESOLUTION FD 94-0 10
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT AN MOU
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95, AND TO RESOLVE AN IMPASSE
IN THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS BETWEEN THE
BOARD AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS
LOCAL 2274
WHEREAS, the Local and Board have met and conferred in good faith regarding issues
within the scope of meet and confer; and,
WHEREAS, the Local and Board have not reached agreement regarding all issues within
the scope of meet and confer;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved the Board agrees as follows:
1. That an impasse in negotiations for a memorandum of understanding covering the period
following July 1, 1994, between the District and the Local does exist; and,
2. It is appropriate to resolve the impasse by adopting the attached memorandum of
understanding; and,
3. The effective date for items referenced within this Resolution shall be July 1, 1994,
unless specifically stated to the contrary.
The Board agrees that no changes to this agreement or current conditions of employment within the
scope of meet and confer will be discussed or changed during the term of this agreement without
express written consent and agreement of both parties.
If a court with proper jurisdiction determines that any single provision of this Resolution is invalid,
the remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain valid and in full force unless otherwise
agreed to by the Local and the Board.
This resolutions entered into this 16th day of November 1994.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTER'S LOCAL 2274
REVISED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREAMBLE
ARTICLE I.
RECOGNITION ............................................................ 1
ARTICLE II.
SECTION 1
SECTION 2
SECTION 3
SECTION 4
SECTION 5
SECTION 6
SECTION 7
SECTION 8
COMPENSATION .......................................................... 2
Salary Ranges Effective 4-1-91 ......................................... 2
Salary Plan ........................................................... 6
Work Periods and Overtime ........................................... 12
Clothing Allowance ................................................... 15
Employee Group Insurance ............................................ 16
Tuition Reimbursement ............................................... 18
Retirement Plan ...................................................... 19
Work Related Injuries ................................................ 20
ARTICLE III.
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECYION
SECTION
SECTION
LEAVE OF ABSENCE ..................................................... 21
1 Holidays ............................................................. 21
2 Vacation Leave ....................................................... 23
3 Sick Leave ........................................................... 25
4 Conversion Factor .................................................... 28
5 Personal Leave ....................................................... 29
6 Bereavement Leave ................................................... 30
7 Compensatory Time ................................................... 31
8 Military Leave ....................................................... 32
9 Jury Duty ........................................................... 33
10 Civil Subpoena/Criminal Subpoena .................................... 34
11 Leaves of Absence without Pay ........................................ 36
ARTICLE IV.
SECTION 1
SECYION 2
SECTION 3
SECTION 4
SECTION 5
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ................................................. 37
Purpose ............................................................. 37
Objectives ........................................................... 37
General Provisions ................................................... 38
Informal Grievance Procedure ......................................... 38
Formal Grievance Procedure .......................................... 39
ARTICLE V.
SECTION 1
SECTION 2
SECTION 3
SECTION 4
SECTION 5
SECTION 6
SAFETY ................................................................. 43
Compliance .......................................................... 43
No Discrimination .................................................... 43
Safety Equipment .................................................... 43
Employee Responsibility ............................................. 43
Minimum Manning .................................................... 44
Smoking Policy ....................................................... 44
ARTICLE VI.
SECTION 1
SECTION 2
MANAGEMENT RIGHTS ................................................... 4 5
Scope of Rights ....................................................... 4 5
Emergency Conditions ................................................ 4 6
ARTICLE VII. MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS ............................................. 47
ARTICLE VIII. APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ................................. 48
ARTICLE IX.
PROVISIONS OF LAW ..................................................... 49
ARTICLE X. TERM ................................................................... 5 0
PREAMBLE
Page 1
This Agreement is made and entered into between the Rancho Cucamonga
Fire Protection District, hereinafter called "District," and the Rancho
Cucamonga Firefighter's Local 2274, hereinafter called "Union". The terms
and conditions contained in this Agreement are applicable to all full-time
employees within this unit and contain the complete results of negotiations
concerning wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment
for said employees represented herein.
ARTICLE I. RECOGNITION
Pursuant to the provisions of existing rules and regulations and applicable
state law, the District hereby acknowledges the Union as the exclusive
recognized employee organization for this representation unit. This unit
includes all non-management safety employees of the District, who are
employed on a full-time basis.
Page 2
SECTION 1: Salary
A. Ranges
ARTICLE II. COMPENSATION
Ranges Effective 4-1-91
SAFETY
A B C D E
*Fire Chief
3% Deferred Comp
*Deputy Chief
(Fire Marshal)
2% Deferred Comp
Battalion Chief
56 Hr. Workweek
36.63 38.46 40.38 42.40 44.52
2930.40 3076.92 3230.77 3392.31 3561.92
6349.20 6666.66 7000.00 7350.00 7717.50
6538.54 6865.46 7208.74 7569.17 7947.63
33.30 34.97 36.71 38.55 40.48
2664.00 2797.20 2937.06 3083.91 3238.11
5772.00 6060.60 6363.63 6681.82 7015.91
5887.44 6181.82 6490.91 6815.45 7156.22
19.82 20.81 21.85 22.95 24.09
2220.00 2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.43
4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59
Battalion Chief
40 Hr. Workweek
27.75 29.14 30.59 32.12 33.73
2220.00 2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.43
4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59
Fire Captain
15.28 16.04 16.84 17.68 18.57
1710.98 1796.53 1886.36 1980.67 2079.71
3707.12 3892.48 4087.10 4291.46 4506.03
Fire Engineer
13.24 13.90 14.60 15.33 16.09
1482.86 1557.00 1634.85 1716.59 1802.42
3212.86 3373.50 3542.18 3719.29 3905.25
Firefighter
11.76 12.35 12.97 13.62 14.30
1317.30 1383.17 1452.33 1524.94 1601.19
2854.16 2996.87 3146.71 3304.05 3469.25
Hazardous Material 16.08
Premium Pay 1801.10
Captain 3902.39
Hazardous Material 14.04
Premium Pay 1572.98
Engineer 3408.12
Hazardous Material 12.57
Premium Pay 1407.43
F i re fig h t e r 3049.42
16.85 17.65 18.49 19.37
1886.85 1976.48 2070.79 2169.83
4087.74 4282.37 4486.72 4701.29
14.71 15.40 16.13 16.90
1647.12 1724.97 1806.72 1892.55
3568.77 3737.44 3914.55 4100.52
13.15 13.77 14.42 15.10
1473.29 1542.45 1615.07 1691.31
3192.13 3341.97 3499.31 3664.51
A B C D g
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Page 3
Fire Inspector 19.66
(Equal to Fire Eng. 1572.98
+ 5% of E Step 3408.12
Eng.)
20.59 21.56 22.58 23.66
1647.12 1724.97 1806.72 1892.55
3568.77 3737.44 3914.55 4100.52
Hazardous Material 19.82 20.81 21.85 22.95 24.09
Coordinator 2220.00 2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.43
4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59
Deputy Fire Marshal27.75
2220.00
4810.00
29.14 30.59 32.12 33.73
2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.43
5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59
NON-SAFETY
A B C D E
*Admin. Services 22.27
Officer 1781.65
3860.24
2% Deferred Comp 3938.99
Management 19.66
Analyst II 1572.55
3407.20
23.38 24.55 25.78 27.07
1870.73 1964.27 2062.48 2165.61
4053.25 4255.91 4468.71 4692.15
4135.94 4342.74 4559.87 4787.87
20.64 21.67 22.76 23.89
1651.18 1733.74 1820.43 1911.45
3577.56 3756.44 3944.26 4141.47
Maintenance 20.43 21.45 22.53 23.65 24.83
Officer 1634.52 1716.25 1802.06 1892.16 1986.77
3541.47 3718.54 3904.47 4099.69 4304.67
Mainten a nce 15.31 16.08 16.88 17.73 18.61
T e c h 1225.16 1286.42 1350.74 1418.28 1489.19
2654.52 2787.25 2926.61 3072.94 3226.59
Com m unications 15.31 16.08 16.88 17.73 18.61
T ec h 1225.16 1286.42 1350.74 1418.28 1489.19
2654.52 2787.25 2926.61 3072.94 3226.59
Fire Equipment 15.31
Mechanic 1225.16
2654.52
Fire Equip 11.47
Serv. Worker 917.50
1987.91
16.08 16.88 17.73 18.61
1286.42 1350.74 1418.28 1489.19
2787.25 2926.61 3072.94 3226.59
12.04 12.64 13.28 13.94
963.37 1011.54 1062.12 1115.22
2087.31 2191.67 2301.25 2416.32
Fire Safety 21.16 22.21 23.32 24.49 25.71
Analyst 1692.42 1777.04 1865.90 1959.19 2057.15
3666.92 3850.26 4042.78 4244.91 4457.16
A B C D E
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Hourly
Bi-Week
Monthly
Fire Prevention 15.62 16.41 17.23 18.09 18.99 Hourly
Page 4
Specialist
1249.98 1312.48 1378.10 1447.01 1519.36 Bi-Week
2708.29 2843.70 2985.89 3135.18 3291.94 Monthly
Administrative 13.32 13.99 14.69 15.42
Secretary 1065.84 1119.13 1175.09 1233.84
2309.32 2424.78 2546.02 2673.32
Secretary
11.58 12.16 12.77 13.41
926.80 973.14 1021.79 1072.88
2008.06 2108.47 2213.89 2324.58
16.19 Hourly
1295.53 Bi-Week
2806.99 Monthly
14.08 Hourly
1126.53 Bi-Week
2440.81 Monthly
Public Services
Technician
12.76 13.39 14.06 14.77
1020.48 1071.50 1125.08 1181.33
2211.04 2321.59 2437.67 2559.56
15.50 Hourly
1240.40 Bi-Week
2687.53 Monthly
Office Spec. II
9.73 10.22 10.73 11.26
778.46 817.39 858.25 901.17
1686.67 1771.00 1859.55 1952.53
11.83 Hourly
946.23 Bi-Week
2050.15 Monthly
Office Spec. I
8.85 9.29 9.76 10.24
707.88 743.28 780.44 819.46
1533.75 1610.43 1690.95 1775.50
10.76 Hourly
860.44 Bi-Week
1854.28 Monthly
Apprentice
Firefighter
8.32 8.73 9.17 9.63
931.45 978.02 1026.92 1078.27
2018.13 2119.04 2224.99 2336.24
10.11 Hourly
1132.18 Bi-Week
2453.05 Monthly
* Not eli~lible for overtime conXgensation
Page 5
B. Survey Cities:
"Now, therefore, be it resolved the Union and District agree as follows:
1. The survey cities shall be: Fullerton,
West Covina, Corona, Ontario, Pomona, Orange, Riverside,
San Bernardino City, Upland.
2. May 1st of each year, a survey of the identified labor
market cities shall be completed, reviewed by the Union
and District, and used as the comparison basis for any
negotiations regarding market equity adjustment and cost
of living adjustment. This survey shall not obligate the
District to implement any salary increase(s).
SECTION 2
A.
Page 6
Salary Plan
Salary Ranges
The base salary ranges for all classes in the bargaining unit
shall consist of ranges having five (5) steps, labeled A through
E, with approximately 5% between each step. Placement within
the range shall be in accordance with the following:
1. Salary on Appointment
New employees shall be compensated at Step "A" of the
salary range to which their class is allocated. If unusual
recruitment difficulties are encountered or a candidate is
exceptionally well qualified, appointment at a higher step
in the salary range may be authorized by the Fire Chief.
2. Merit Salary Adjustments
Advancement within a salary range shall not be
automatic, but shall be based upon job performance and
granted only on the recommendation of the employee's
supervisor and approval of the Fire Chief. Employees
shall be considered for merit salary increases in
accordance with the following:
Employees who are placed at Step A upon original
employment, reinstatement, or promotion are
eligible for a merit salary review after six (6)
months of service. Subsequent merit salary review
dates shall fall upon the completion of twelve (12)
month service intervals.
Employees who are placed at Step B or above upon
original employment, reinstatement, or promotion
shall be eligible for a merit salary review after
twelve (12) months of service. Subsequent review
dates shall fall upon the completion of twelve (12)
month service intervals.
d ,
Page 7
The granting of an official leave of absence of more
than thirty (30) continuous calendar days, other
than military leave, shall cause the employee's
merit salary review date to be extended the
number of calendar days he was on leave.
If, in the supervisor's judgement, the employee's
performance does not justify a salary increase on
the review date, the employee shall be re-
evaluated before the expiration of six (6) months
dating from the employee's review date. If the
period of postponement exceeds three (3) months
and the employee receives a salary increase, the
employee shall be assigned a new review date
based on the date the increase was granted.
Authorized salary step increases shall become
effective at the beginning of the pay period nearest
the employee's review date.
Should an employee's review date be overlooked,
and upon discovery of the error, the employee is
recommended for a salary increase, the employee
shall receive a supplemental payment
compensating him for the additional salary he
would have received had the increase been granted
at the appropriate time.
The normal merit salary increase shall be one step
granted in accordance with the preceding. However
to reward outstanding achievement and
performance, the Fire Chief may grant one (1)
additional stepincrease not to exceed one (1) step
in any (6) month period.
In order to address a situation wherein application
of this section would result in the inequitable
treatment of employees and upon the
recommendation of the Fire Chief and approval of
the Board an employee may be placed at any step
in the salary range for his class.
Page 8
Salary on Promotion
An employee, who is promoted to a position in a class
with a higher salary range than the class in which he
formerly occupied a position, shall receive the nearest
higher monthly salary in the higher salary range that
would constitute a minimum 5% salary increase over his
base salary rate, provided that no employee may receive
a rate in excess of Step E of the promotional class. If the
promotion occurs within sixty (60) days of a scheduled
merit salary review date, the employee shall receive the
merit increase (if otherwise entitled to it) and the
promotional increase concurrently. The employee shall
be given a new merit salary review date for purposes of
future salary step advancement. The new date shall be
based upon the effective date of the promotion.
Salary on Demotion
An employee who is demoted to a position in a class with
a lower salary range shall receive a new merit salary
review date based upon the effective date of the
demotion and receive a salary in accordance with the
following:
Disciplinary demotion - any designated salary step
in the lower salary range which will result in the
employee's receiving at least a five (5) percent
reduction in pay.
Non-disciplinary demotion - that salary step he
would have received in the lower class if his
services had been continuous in said lower class.
Salary on Transfer
An employee who is transferred from one position to
another in the same class or to another position in a
similar class having the same salary range shall receive
the same step in the salary range that he previously
received and his merit salary review date shall not
change.
6. Salary on Position Reclassi~cation
Page 9
When an employee's position is reclassified and the
employee is appointed to the position, his salary shall be
determined as follows:
If the position is reclassified to a class with a higher
salary range than the former class, his salary and
merit salary review date shall be set in the same
manner as if he had been promoted.
b,
If the salary of the employee is the same or less
than the maximum of the salary range of the new
class and the salary range of the new class is the
same as the previous class, his salary and merit
salary review date shall not change.
C,
If the salary of the employee is greater than the
maximum of the range of the new class, the salary
of the employee shall be designated as a Y-rate and
shall not change during continuous regular service
until the maximum of the salary range to which the
class is assigned exceeds the salary of the
employee.
7. Salary on Re-employment
An employee recalled after a layoff shall receive the
same salary step in the range of the class which he was
receiving upon layoff.
8. Salary on Rehire
Upon rehire, an employee shall be placed at such salary
step as may be recommended by the supervisor and
approved by the Fire Chief. The employee's merit salary
review date shall be based on the date of rehire.
,
10.
Page 10
Acting Pay
Acting pay shall be one (1) step, approximately 5%, above
the affected employee's base salary rate. To receive
acting pay the employee must:
Be formally assigned duties appropriate to the
higher class.
b,
Work in the higher class at least fifteen (15)
consecutive work days, 5 shifts for employees
working twenty-four (24) hour shifts. Acting pay
will be paid beginning with the sixteenth (16th)
consecutive day worked in an acting capacity, sixth
(6th) shift for employees working twenty-four (24)
hours shifts.
Salary on Change in Range Assignment
When a class is reassigned to either a higher or lower
salary range by the Board, the salary of each incumbent
in such class on the date the reassignment is effective
shall be adjusted to the step he was receiving in the
former range.
11. Premium Pay - Haz-Mat
The number of personnel maintained on the Haz-Mat
team is determined by the needs of the District. The
decision as to the number of personnel on the team is
made by the District. Personnel on the team must
maintain their state certification, membership in the
West End Hazardous Assistance Team, attend reasonable
training sessions deemed necessary by the District, and
agree to remain members of the District's Haz-Mat Team
for a period of 3 years. Training to maintain status on
the team shall be at the District's expense. Members who
meet the above requirements shall be compensated for
their involvement by being paid a dollar amount equal to
5% of Step E of the Fire Engineer class.
Page 11
B. On-Call Pay
Employees in the classification of Fire Prevention Inspector
shall receive 5% of E step of Fire Engineer per month as full
compensation for services in an on-call status. The
requirements and conditions which attend on-call status shall
be established by the District and affected employees agree to
comply with said requirements and conditions. It is
understood by the District and Union that the amount of on-call
time (approximately 1/3 of required monthly on-call) to be
served by each employee was instrumental in arriving at the
accord noted herein.
C Standby Pay
Standby pay to Maintenance Officer, Maintenance Technician
and Communications Technician shall be at the rate of $195 per
month.
SECTION 3
A.
C
Page 12
Work Periods and Overtime
Work Periods
The work period for shift personnel is 14 days. Overtime,
pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is paid for
time worked in excess of 112 hours in the period. The work
period for 40 hour personnel is seven (7) days with overtime
being time worked in excess of 40 hours in the period.
Work Shifts
All 24 hour work shifts begin at 08:00 a.m. and end at
08:00 a.m. the following day, 24 hours thereafter.
Ten (10) hour work shifts begin at 07:00 a.m. and ends
at 06:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday, with one hour
lunch.
Flex Time
The work schedules of employees assigned to other than
fire suppression are subject to change depending on
needs of the service or desires of the concerned
employee(s). (See item 3.)
The District shall not change work schedules when the
sole purpose of the change is to avoid payment of time
and one-half for overtime. This however, is not to be
interpreted as preventing a schedule change upon the
mutual agreement of the District and affected employee.
Employees may request schedule changes to address
personal interests. Whenever possible such requests will
be accommodated, provided however, that needs of the
service as determined by the District will take
precedence over employee preferences.
The District will not effect schedule changes but for good
and sufficient cause.
Page 13
Overtime Pay
The rate of pay for overtime hours worked shall be at the
rate of time and one half the regular rate of pay, for
those employees eligible for overtime.
Wages: The Battalion Chief in Training and suppression
Battalion Chief's will be paid overtime at the 56 hour rate
for any overtime worked, at time and one half rate of
pay.
"For purposes of computing overtime pay under the Fair
Labor Standards Act, military leave, vacation, holiday
time, I-time, and sick leave shall not be considered hours
worked·"
,
For the purpose of this section, work time shall
include traveling to or from the normal work site.
not
All full-time employees who are called back to work from
off-duty as a result of an emergency, shall be paid at the
rate of time and one-half for any hours worked, with a
minimum of two (2) hours pay for each emergency recall.
Employees required to work more than fifteen (15)
minutes shall be compensated for a minimum of one (1)
hour; any time worked over one (1) hour will be paid in
one-half hour increments. (Fifteen (15) minutes work
shall constitute one-half hour.) For purposes of this
section, work time shall not include time spent in
traveling to and from the work site.
Employees required (held over) to work more than
fifteen (15) minutes overtime shall be compensated for a
minimum of one (1) hour. Any overtime worked in
excess of one (1) hour will be paid in half hour
increments. Provisions shall be made for an equitable
distribution of overtime, consistent with efficient
operations of the District.
"Employees may be subject to recall to be placed on
overtime to fill vacancies created by training and
education of on-duty personnel."
E. Call Back
Page 14
A minimum of two (2) hours of work time will be credited to
an employee who responds to a District call to come to work
during his off-duty hours. This section is not to be interpreted
as requiring said minimum in the event of an extended work
day or when the employee begins his regular work shift before
the normal starting time.
F. 4/10 Leave
With the 4/10 implementation, employees who
experience hardship due to child care issues, may request
alteration of their schedule by taking a 1/2 hour lunch
and arriving at work 1/2 hour late or leaving work I/2
hour early. Additionally, employees who carpool at least
60% of the pay period and 60% of the distance into the
Civic Center are eligible to leave 1/2 hour early from
work or arrive 1/2 hour late.
It is anticipated that the Fire District employees working
a 40 hour week will begin the 4/10 program on July 20,
1992. This is the beginning of a pay period and that is
when the program needs to start.
SECTION 4
Uniform Allowance
Page 15
The District shall provide three (3) sets of work uniforms for
each employee who is required to wear a uniform prior to
his/her starting date. Suppression members must buy their
own class A uniforms at the completion of probation.
The Fire District provides $425.00 annually to the Maintenance
Officer, Maintenance Technician, Fire Prevention Specialist,
Communications Technician, Fire Equipment Mechanic for the
purchase and maintenance of uniforms required to be worn in
the performance of their job responsibilities. The Fire District
also provides $425 annually to safety members.
Page 16
SECTION5 Employee Group Insurance
A,
The District will provide group insurance plans in accordance
with the following:
1. Health Insurance
The District will pay one hundred percent (100%) of
the premiums for medical insurance through the
State of California Public Employee's Medical and
Hospital Care Program.
"The Fire District provides fully paid employee and
family health insurance for all existing full-time
continuous and retired employees as of November
17, 1994."
C,
"The Fire District shall provide fully paid employee
and family health insurance for all full-time
continuous employees hired after November 17,
1994, at the lowest, fully paid insurance plan
offered by the Public Employees Medical and
Hospital Care Program."
"All new full-time continuous employees hired after
November 17, 1994, shall be responsible for paying
their premiums for medical insurance through the
State of California Public Employees Medical and
Hospital Care Program, upon their retirement."
"Cash compensation in lieu of medical benefits in
the amounts of $200.00 for single employees or
$300.00 for employees with dependents, may be
provided to those employees that can verify that
their spouse and/or family can provide full health
insurance. Selection of compensation shall be at the
employee's discretion. The employee may reenter
the District's health plan at any time."
2. Dental Insurance
The Fire District provides fully paid employee and
family dental insurance plan for all full-time
continuous employees.
Page 17
3. Vision Insurance
The Fire District provides vision care coverage for
all full time continuous employees at a payment of
up to $19.00 monthly beginning July 1, 1992.
SECTION 6
A.
Page 18
Tuition Reimbursement
Union
Implementation of an educational reimbursement program.
The program allows for reimbursement of out of pocket
expenses (up to a specified maximum) incurred in the pursuit
of a degree from an accredited college or university. The
expenses are reimbursed upon successful completion of a
course with a grade of "C' or better and for pass/fail classes
with a "pass", and submittal of receipts showing the costs for
the course. Reimbursement is for tuition, books, supplies,
parking, lab expenses, and miscellaneous expenses for taking
the course(s). Reimbursement does not include mileage or
gasoline reimbursement or work hour pay.
The maximum tuition reimbursed is set on a fiscal year basis
with the total reimbursed being the average of the costs for
course work at California State University Fullerton, Cal Poly
Pomona, and California State University San Bernardino. For
fiscal year 1990/91 the maximum reimbursement is up to
$1500.
Approval for reimbursement must be obtained
employee's supervisor prior to taking the course.
by the
SECTION 7
Retirement Plan
Page 19
A. Present Benefits
C
The District is enrolled in the State of California Public
Employee's Retirement System. All benefits provided District
employees under the District's Plan are paid by the District.
Present benefits for public safety employees include the
following:
Section 21252.01 2% at 50 Supplemental or Modified
Formula
Section 21380-21387 1959 Survivor Benefits. Third level
Section 20615 Payment of Normal Member Contributions
One Year Highest Compensation
No later than January 1, 1990, the District's retirement plan
with the PERS will be amended to add Section 20024.2 One
Year Highest Compensation.
Conversion Union
Effective July 1, 1989 employees aged 49 or over shall be
permitted to convert member contributions to PERS paid by the
District to salary for the purpose of establishing a higher base
salary, for the last year of a pre-determined year of
retirement. The employee shall then be responsible for paying
said contributions.
SECTION 8
Page 20
Work Related Injuries
All management and non-management, non-safety and safety
Fire District employees are entitled to their full salary and
benefits when they sustain an on-the-job work related injury
for up to one (1) year. (See Labor Code Section 4850 for
provisions). Although Section 4850 covers only safety
personnel, the District is extending this same benefit to non-
safety employees. Temporary disability payments received
during any injury period are to be returned to the Fire District.
SECTION 1:
A.
Page 21
ARTICLE III. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Holidays
Holidays are those days which the District designates as
observed holidays. Holiday leave is a right, earned as a
condition of employment, to a leave of absence with pay. The
holidays designated by the District are as follows:
40 Hour Personnel
( 1 ) January 1 .......... New Years Day
(2) January ............ Martin Luther King's Birthday (3rd Monday)
(3) February .......... President's Day (3rd Monday)
(4) May ................ Memorial Day (last Monday)
( 5 ) July 4 .............. Independence Day
(6) September ......... Labor Day (lst Monday)
( 7 ) November 11 ...... Veteran's Day
( 8 ) November ......... Thanksgiving (4th Thursday)
(9) November ......... The day following Thanksgiving
(10) December 24 ....... The day preceding Christmas
(11) December 25 ....... Christmas
(12) Three discretionary (floating) days may be taken by an employee
at his/her convenience, subject to approval of the supervisor.
The thirty hours for the three floating holidays shall be credited
to the employee at the start of pay period No. 1 of each year.
Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday
shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a
Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed
as the holiday.
56 Hour Personnel
( 1 ) January 1 .......... New Years Day
(2) January 18 .........Martin Luther King's Birthday
(3) February 12 ....... Lincoln's Birthday
(4) February 22 ....... Washington's Birthday
(5) May ................ Memorial Day (last Monday)
(6) July 4 .............. Independence Day
(7) September ......... Labor Day (lst Monday)
( 8 ) September 9 ....... Admissions Day
( 9 ) October 12 ......... Columbus Day
(10) November 11 ...... Veteran's Day
( 11 ) November ......... Thanksgiving (4th Thursday)
(12) November ......... The day following Thanksgiving
(13) December 24 ....... The day preceding Christmas
(14) December 25 ....... Christmas
Page 22
B. Employees shall accrue holiday time as follows:
Type of Personnel
Per Holiday Annually Maximum Accrual
Shift Personnel
40 Hour Personnel
12 hours 168 hrs. 216 hours
10 hours 140 hrs. 180 hours
C
No District employee will be allowed to exceed the maximum
accrual at any time. As excess holiday time is earned, it must
either be taken as time off or be paid for by the District.
Effective pay period No. 1 of each year (which normally occurs
mid to late December of each year) holiday time shall be
accrued by the employees within the pay period in which it
occurs.
The District will buy back all or part of accrued holiday
time at the then current hourly rate, if a request is made
(in writing) by November 30th of their holiday balance
and option for sell back.
Holidays may be used as scheduled time off with the
approval of the supervisor.
E.
District employees will be advised, in writing, within the pay
period prior to the time that maximum holiday accrual is
reached or that they are approaching their maximum accrual.
Any employee who is on vacation or sick leave when a holiday
occurs will not have that holiday charged against his/her
vacation or sick leave.
Forty hour personnel who obtain prior approval from their
immediate supervisor to work a holiday will be allowed to
bank that holiday at straight time. If a 40-hour employee, who
is eligible to receive overtime compensation, is recalled to
work on a holiday, then the holiday will be banked at time and
a half for the number of hours actually worked that day.
SECTION 2:
Vacation Leave
Page 23
Vacation leave is a right to a leave of absence with pay.
earned as a condition of employment.
It is
All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue
working days of vacation monthly according to the following
schedule:
40 hour personnel
Years of
Completed Service
Annual Maximum Pay Period
Accrual Accrual Accrual Rate~
1-3 years
4-7 years
8-10 years
11 - 19 years
20-24 years
25+ years
85.72 hours 192.0 3.297
128.57 hours 272.0 4.945
171.43 hours 353.0 6.593
188.58 hours 353.0 7.253
196.58 hours 353.0 7.561
204.58 hours 353.0 7.868
Shift Personnel
Years of
Completed Service
Annual Maximum Pay Period
Accrual Accrual Accrual Ratea
1-3 years
4-7 years
8-10 years
11 - 19 years
20-24 years
25+ years
120 hrs/5 shifts 288.0
180 hrs/7.5 shifts 408.0
240 hrs/lO shifts 528.0
264 hrs/11 shifts 528.0
288 hrs/12 shifts 528.00
312 hrs/13 shifts 528.00
4.615
6.923
9.231
10.154
11.077
12.0
An employee who, as of July 1 of any given year, has
completed 10, 20 and 25 years of service shall receive a one-
time credit of 24 hours of vacation, if a shift employee, or 10
hours, if a 40 hour employee. The employee shall, beginning
their 1 lth, 21st and 251h year accrue vacation at the
appropriate pay period accrual rate.
C
The District will notify employees, in writing, within the pay
period prior to the time that maximum vacation accrual will be
reached that the accrual is approaching that maximum. The
employee will then be required to (1) schedule time off or, (2)
receive pay in lieu of time off so as to not exceed the maximum
accrual.
Page 24
Any full-time employee who is about to terminate employment
and has earned vacation time to his credit, shall be paid for
such vacation time on the effective date of such termination.
When separation is caused by death of an employee, payment
shall be made to the estate of such employee.
Page 25
SECTION 3: Sick Leave
Sick leave is the authorized absence from duty of an employee
because of physical or mental illness, injury, pregnancy, confirmed
exposure to a serious contagious disease, or for a medical, optical, or
dental appointment.
A. Full-time Employees
Sick leave is that amount of leave designated by the
District.
2. All employees shall be entitled to sick leave as follows:
Personnel Monthly
Annual Accrual Max. Accrual
40 hr
Personnel 10 hours 120 hours No limit
Shift 12 hours 144 hours No limit
Personnel (1/2 shift) (6 shifts)
3. Sick leave with pay may be used for:
a. Any bona fide illness or injury.
b. Quarantine due to exposure to contagious disease.
Any treatment or examination included to, but not
limited to, medical, dental, eye examination, or
psychiatric.
d ,
Not more than twelve (12) days for 40-hour
employees or six (6) shifts for shift personnel of
sick leave each calendar year in case an employee's
presence is required elsewhere because of sickness,
disability, or child birth of a member of his/her
immediate family, as defined in District Personnel
Rules.
C
F..
G.
Page 26
No employee shall be entitled to sick leave with pay while
absent from duty for the following causes:
Disability arising from sickness or injury purposely self-
inflicted or caused by his own willful misconduct.
2. Sickness or disability sustained while on leave of absence.
Sick leave shall not be used in lieu of or in addition to vacation.
The Fire Chief reserves the right to require evidence in the
form of a physician's certificate whenever an employee is
absent and requests sick leave for the period of absence,
excepting personal leave (see Section 5).
Any employee absent from work due to illness or accident,
may at the discretion of the Fire Chief, be required to submit to
a physical examination before returning to active duty. Such
physical examination shall be performed by a physician
stipulated by the District and shall be at the District's expense.
Termination of an employee's continuous service, except by
reason of retirement or lay-off for lack of work or funds shall
abrogate all sick leave and no payment will be made by the
District for sick leave accrued to the time of such termination
regardless of whether or not such employee subsequently re-
enters District service.
Any employee incurring a serious injury or illness while on
paid vacation leave may have those days of illness changed to
sick leave with pay and vacation days restored accordingly,
provided the employee has sufficient sick leave accrued and
the period of illness is certified by a written doctor's statement.
Page 27
Employees with 10 or more years of service shall be eligible to
convert unused sick leave to vacation in accordance with the
following:
Shift employees who in the preceding calendar year have
accrued 108 to 144 (90 to 120 for 40-hour week
employees) unused hours of sick leave earned in that
preceding calendar year, may exercise the option of
having one-half of that unused sick leave accrued in the
preceding year converted to vacation leave and the
remainder carried over as accrued sick leave.
Those members of this unit who have accrued 72 to 108
(60 to 90 for 40-hour week employees) unused hours of
sick leave earned in the preceding calendar year may
exercise the option of having one-fourth of the unused
sick leave accrued in the preceding calendar year
converted to vacation leave and the remainder carried
over as accrued sick leave.
Any employee who qualifies to convert sick leave to
vacation leave must submit a written request to the
District on or before January 15th of the year in which
the conversion is to be made.
Upon the service retirement of an employee, the employee will
have the option of selling back to the District up to one-half of
his total accumulated unused sick leave at his then current
hourly rate, or the employee may apply his unused
accumulated sick leave toward service time for retirement, in
accordance with the Public Employees' Retirement Law, Section
20862.8. Sick leave bought back by the District may not be
applied for service credit, but the sick leave remaining after
the "buy-back" may be credited as service time in accordance
with the above-mentioned law.
Page 28
SECTION 4: Conversion Factor
Effective April 1, 1990, the factor used to convert the accruals for 40
hour per week personnel to 56 hour per week personnel will be:
Vacation, sick leave, and holiday:
Work Week Basis
Vacation 40 Hour 56 Hour
Conversion Factor
1-3 years 85.72 120 1.5
4-7 years 128.57 180 1.5
8-10 years 171.43 240 1.5
11-19 years 188.58 264 1.57
20-24 years 196.58 288 1.57
25+ years 204.58 312 1.57
Holiday 140 168 1.5
Sick 120 144 1.5
(4.0 to 56)
EXAMPLE (8-10 year employee)
Employee Benefits
Vacation = 100 hours
Holiday = 72 hours
Sick = 300 hours
472 total hours x 1.5 (factor) = 708 hours total
NOTE: If an employee goes form a 56 to 40 hours basis, the conversion will be
the reciprocal of 1.5 or .667.
SECTION 5:
A.
C
Page 29
Personal Leave
The employee shall be granted one (1) day's paid personal
leave to attend the funeral of a close relative not in the
employee's immediate family.
An employee required to appear before a court for other than
subpoenas due to actions as a District employee or jury duty
will receive the necessary time as paid personal leave,
providing:
He notifies his supervisor or Duty Chief in advance, with
adequate time remaining so that a relief may be obtained
for him.
The employee must return to duty within a reasonable
time after the appearance.
Personal leave will be charged against any time the employee
has accrued, such as sick leave, vacation, and compensatory
time, at the employee's option.
Employees can use up to 20 hours of accrued sick leave as
personal leave. This 20 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1
hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is
for emergency situations requiring the employee's attention
and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this
time.
SECTION 6:
Bereavement Leave
Page 30
A. 40-hour Personnel
In the event of a death in the employee's immediate family,
the employee shall be granted three (3) days paid
bereavement leave. A maximum of five (5) days paid
bereavement leave shall be granted if there is a death in the
immediate family outside the state boundaries.
Shift Personnel
In the event of a death in the employee's immediate family,
the employee shall be granted two (2) shifts paid bereavement
leave. A maximum of three (3) shifts paid bereavement leave
shall be granted if there is a death in the immediate family
outside the state boundaries and the employee attends the
services.
C
Immediate family is defined as:
Spouse, children, stepchildren, stepfather, stepmother, parents,
brother, sister, grandfather, grandmother, grandchild, and the
employee's mother-in law, father-in-law or grandparents-in
law.
SECTION 7:
A.
C
Page 3 1
Compensatory Time
Compensatory time may be earned for required attendance at
special meetings of the Board of Directors and District
committees, except when such meetings are held in lieu of a
regularly scheduled meeting or when such meetings are called
and/or scheduled as part of the annual budget preparation
process and annual audit.
Compensatory time may also be earned for special and/or
unusual work situations not provided for in the preceding
paragraphs.
The earning and accrual of compensatory time requires the
approval of the employee's supervisor.
SECTION 8:
A.
C
Page 32
Military Leave
Every employee who is a member of a state or federal reserve
military unit shall be entitled to absent himself from his
service with the District while engaged in the performance of
ordered military duty and while going to or returning from
such duty in accordance with the laws of the State of California
or federal government.
Employees are entitled to thirty (30) days paid military leave
in any one fiscal year, provided they have been employed by
the District for one (1) year prior to this leave. Any employee
with less than one years', service must use accrued annual
leave or compensatory time if he wishes to receive his normal
pay.
Employees who are called or volunteer for service with the
armed forces of the United States shall be entitled to
reinstatement to their former positions. Upon application for
reinstatement, the individual must display a certificate
showing service was other than dishonorable. However, any
individual possessing right of reinstatement automatically
forfeits these rights upon his voluntary enlistment for a second
term.
Any employee returning from service with the armed forces
shall be entitled to such length of service seniority as would
have been credited to him had he remained for that period of
time with the District.
E.
An employee who was in a probationary period at the time of
his leave shall, upon his return, complete the remaining portion
of the probationary period according to the present rules.
An employee promoted to fill a vacancy created by a person
serving in the armed forces shall hold such position subject to
the return of the veteran. The employee affected by the return
shall be restored to his former position or one of a similar
nature while the returning employee resumes the position he
previously held.
SECTION 9:
A.
Page 33
Jury Duty
Any member of the District who is called or required to serve
as a trial juror may absent himself from his duties with the
District during the period of such service or while necessarily
being present in court as a result of such call. Such member on
jury duty will continue to receive his normal pay, provided he:
Notifies his superior or Duty Chief in advance, with
adequate time remaining so that a relief may be
obtained.
Returned to duty within a reasonable time after being
released with a signed certificate of service from the
court stipulating the hours of service and release time.
This certificate may be obtained by asking the court
secretary or bailiff. The employee then forwards it to his
superior or Duty Chief.
Pay received for service while absent from the District
must be turned over to the District; however, pay
received while off duty may be kept by the employee.
All personnel called for jury duty must abide by all of the
above rules and must return to work if dismissed before
the end of their regular work shift.
Page 34
SECTION 10: Civil Subpoena/Criminal Subpoena
A. Civil Subpoena
When members of the District have been served a civil
subpoena to appear in court as a witness due to actions as
a District employee, the following procedure shall be
followed:
Personnel will be paid at their regular hourly rate
while they are in court.
District transportation will be provided when
available. If the employee uses his own
transportation, he will be reimbursed by the
District at the prevailing mileage rate.
If the employee is required to appear in a court
that is outside the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District and this appearance requires the
employee to buy a meal and/or lodging he will be
reimbursed.
If an extended appearance in court is necessary
where lodging and meals would be required,
authorization would be required by the department
head.
B. Criminal Subpoena
Pursuant to Penal Code Section 1326 et. seq., if an
employee is served with a criminal subpoena, the
employee will be paid at his regular hourly rate while in
court.
District transportation will be provided when available.
If the employee uses his own transportation, he will be
reimbursed by the District at the prevailing mileage rate.
Page 35
If the employee is required to appear in court outside the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and this
appearance requires the employee to buy a meal he will
be reimbursed.
If an extended appearance in court is necessary where
lodging and meals would be required, authorization
would be required by the department head.
4. A criminal subpoena need not have a court stamp affixed·
Page 36
SECTION 11: Leaves of Absence without Pay
Upon the written request of the employee, a leave of absence
may be granted for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days by
the Fire Chief, or a period not to exceed one (1) year by the
Board of Directors.
Failure of the employee to return to his employment upon the
termination of an authorized leave of absence shall constitute a
separation from service of that employee.
C
Leave of absence without pay granted by the Board shall not
be construed as a break in service or employment. During
these periods, vacation, holiday, or sick leave credits shall not
accrue. An employee reinstated after a leave of absence
without pay shall receive the same step in the salary range he
received when he began his leave of absence. Time spent on
such leave without pay shall not count toward service for
increases within the salary range. For purposes of this section,
the employee's merit increase eligibility date shall commence
upon the date of reinstatement.
An employee on an approved leave of absence without pay
may continue his medical insurance coverage by paying the full
cost to the District in advance for each month, or portion
thereof, of which he is absent.
SECTION 1:
A.
SECTION 2:
A.
ARTICLE IV. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Page 37
Purpose
This article is intended to provide a fair and orderly procedure
for the resolution of employee grievances involving wages,
hours and terms and conditions of employment. A grievance is
a claimed violation, misinterpretation, mis-application, or non-
compliance with existing District codes, resolutions, rules,
regulations, or this document.
Objectives
The grievance procedure is established to accomplish the
following objectives:
To settle disagreements at the employee-supervisor level,
informally if possible.
2. To provide an orderly procedure to handle grievances.
3. To resolve grievances as quickly as possible.
To correct, if possible, the cause of grievances to prevent
future similar complaints.
To provide for a two-way system of communication by
making it possible for levels of supervision to address
problems, complaints, and questions raised by employees.
To reduce the number of grievances by allowing them to
be expressed and thereby adjusted and eliminated.
To promote harmonious relations generally among
employees, their supervisors and the administrative staff.
8. To assure fair and equitable treatment of all employees.
SECTION 3:
A.
B,
C
F_.
F,
SECTION 4:
Page 38
General Provisions
Preparation of a grievance will be accomplished in such a
manner and at a time that will not interfere with normally
required work procedures.
No individual member of the Board of Directors shall be
approached at any time that the grievance is being processed.
Failure of the grievant to comply with time limitations
specified in the grievance procedure shall constitute a
withdrawal of the grievance, except upon a showing of good
cause for such failure. Failure of the District supervisory or
administrative staff to comply with specified time limitations
shall permit the grievant to proceed to the next step in the
procedure. E X C E P T I O N: Notwithstanding the above, an
extension of time is permitted with the mutual consent of both
parties.
In the event a grievant elects to represent himself or is
represented by counsel other than that provided by the
employee organization, the employee organization shall be
apprised of the nature and resolution of the grievance if the
issues involved are within the scope of said organization's
representation rights.
If an individual named in a dispute is unavailable within the
time period specified in these procedures, time limitations can
be extended by mutual agreement of the representatives of the
respective parties.
Any period of time specified in this rule for the giving of notice
or taking of any action exclude weekends and holidays.
Informal Grievance Procedure
Most problems or complaints can be settled if the employee
will promptly, informally and amicably discuss them with his
immediate supervisor. Such an initial discussion shall precede
any use of the formal grievance procedure. If the immediate
supervisor fails to reply to the employee within three (3) days,
or the employee is not satisfied with the decision, the employee
may utilize the Formal Grievance Procedure.
SECTION 5:
A.
Page 39
Formal Grievance Procedure
Step I
The employee and/or his representative shall present his
grievance, in writing and signed, to his immediate
supervisor within fifteen (15) days of the date that cause
for a grievance arises. An official grievance form must be
used stating names, dates, times, place, and nature of
grievance. The employee's supervisor shall attempt to
resolve the grievance with the employee and shall submit
his decision in writing to the employee within three (3)
days after receipt of the grievance. The employee shall
have the right to appeal the decision of his supervisor to
the Fire Chief.
Step II
If the grievance is not resolved to the satisfaction of the
employee the grievant has three (3) days following
receipt of the written response from his supervisor to file
a written appeal to the Fire Chief or his designated
representative.
Written appeal to the Fire Chief or his designated
representative shall consist of the statement of the
grievance and shall include a statement by the grievant's
representative setting forth the reasons why the
response of the employee's supervisor did not
satisfactorily resolve the grievance and an indication of
the action desired by the grievant.
After submission of the written appeal, the Fire Chief or
his designee shall reply within three (3) days, in writing,
to the grievant regarding the grievance. In event of
rejection, reasons for so doing will be included in the
response.
C
Page 40
Step III
If the grievance is not resolved by the Fire Chief or his
designee to the satisfaction of the grievant, the grievant
may, within three (3) days, then file a written appeal to
the District Board of Directors.
An appeal to the Board must include a complete
statement of facts supporting the grievance, a statement
by the grievant or representative setting forth the
reasons why the Fire Chief or his representative did not
satisfactorily resolve the grievance and a list of witnesses
the grievant would call to testify. The grievant may
request a formal hearing before the Board and, further,
may request the hearings to be a closed personnel
session. The Board shall schedule such hearings within
ten (10) days after receipt of the request. The Board
shall submit its decision, in writing, to the employee
within ten (10) days of the date of the hearing. If no
submittal is made, the grievance shall be deemed
rejected and the decision of the Fire Chief sustained.
Step IV
"If the grievance is not settled in Step III, advisory
arbitration may be invoked in accordance with the
following:"
C,
The request for arbitration must be submitted
within ten (10) days of receipt of the decision of the
Board of Directors.
A "Fact Sheet" must be submitted to the arbitrator
by both parties, stating the nature of the grievance
and desired action.
The term "arbitrator," as used herein, shall refer to
a single arbitrator.
A list of five (5) arbitrators shall be requested from
the California State Conciliation Service. The
hearing arbitrator shall be chosen by an initial flip
of a coin, with the winning side, Board or grievant,
Page 41
having the first choice of either selecting the
arbitrator or eliminating one candidate. The turn
shall then revert to the other side, who then can
exercise the same option. This procedure continues
until either an arbitrator is agreed upon or there is
only one candidate remaining.
e,
The arbitrator so selected shall hold a hearing at a
time and place convenient to the parties involved.
Statements of position may be made by the parties,
and witnesses may be called. The arbitrator shall
have the initial authority to determine whether or
not the dispute is arbitrable under the express
terms of this agreement. Once it is determined that
the dispute is arbitrable under the terms, the
arbitrator shall proceed in accordance with the
provisions of this Rule to determine the merits of
the dispute submitted to arbitration.
The location and time of the hearing shall be
mutually agreed upon by both parties. If an
agreement cannot be achieved, each party will
submit their location and time to be drawn by
chance.
All expenses which may be involved in the
arbitration proceedings shall be borne by the
parties equally; however, expenses relating to the
calling of witnesses or the obtaining of depositions
or any other similar expenses associated with such
proceedings shall be borne by the party at whose
request such witnesses or depositions are required.
h ,
Legal counsel may be obtained by either party if
they so wish. Expenses for the legal counsel shall
be borne by the party obtaining such counsel.
The pay for the arbitrator will be based upon the
fee charged by the California State Conciliation
Service for such services.
Failure on the part of the District's representative
or grievant/grievant's representative to appear in
any case before an arbitrator, without good and
Page 42
sufficient cause, shall result in forfeiture of the case
and responsibility for payment of all costs of
arbitration borne by the party failing to appear.
"The decision of the arbitrator shall be advisory and
notbinding upon the District and the Appellant."
Page 43
ARTICLE V. SAFETY
SECTION 1: Compliance
The District and employees in the representation unit shall conform
to and comply with all health, safety, and sanitation requirements
imposed by the District, state or federal law or regulations adopted
under state or federal law.
SECTION 2: No Discrimination
No employee shall be in any way discriminated against as a result of
reporting any condition believed to be a violation of Section 1 of this
Article.
SECTION 3: Safety Equipment
Should the employment duties of an employee in the unit, in the
estimation of OSHA, require use of any equipment or gear to insure
the safety of the employee or others, the District agrees to furnish
such equipment or gear.
SECTION 4: Employee Responsibility
In the course of performing their normally assigned work, employees
will be alert to observe unsafe practices, equipment, and conditions;
as well as environmental conditions in their immediate area which
represent health hazards and will report such conditions to their
immediate supervisor. All employees shall make certain that all
power machinery is equipped with safety devices properly installed
and in working condition and that co-workers use utmost care in the
handling of tools and equipment. Employees shall report all
accidents immediately to their immediate supervisors. Reports shall
be submitted on forms provided by the District.
Page 44
SECTION 5: Minimum Manning
When the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District increases its manning
assignment for a u:uck or engine company to 4 individuals, both
sides agree to meet and confer regarding minimum manning levels.
Minimum manning will be three man engines.
SECTION 6: Smoking Policy
The following smoking policy was developed through meetings
involving Fire District, City and Association representatives:
A. Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to promote a healthy environment
by limiting situations where non-smokers are exposed to
secondary smoke.
B. Scope
This policy will address the use of tobacco products by limiting
their use as defined in the procedures section of this policy.
C Responsibility
It is the responsibility of persons using tobacco, as well as
supervisors of personnel to enforce this policy.
D. Procedure **
Smoking is prohibited in Fire District facilities except
apparatus room.
Smoking is prohibited in any Fire District vehicle.
Smoking is prohibited when personnel are involved in
emergency calls, public presentations, demonstrations,
inspections and public tours. Chewing tobacco will be
allowed in quarters, when the public is not present.
During extended field operation conditions or in the field
during service calls, smoking may be allowed upon the
approval of the unit supervisor.
All outside areas and apparatus rooms shall be permitted
for smoking.
SECTION 1:
Page 45
D.
E.
F.
G.
I.
ARTICLE VI. MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
Scope of Rights
It is understood and agreed that the District possesses the sole fight
and authority to operate and direct the employees of the District in
all aspects, except as modified in this Agreement. These rights
include, but are not limited to:
A. The right to determine its mission, policies, and standards of
service to be provided to the public;
B. To plan, direct, control, and determine the operations or
services to be conducted by employees of the District;
C To determine the methods, means, and number of personnel
needed to carry out the District's mission;
To direct the working forces;
To hire, assign, or transfer employees within the District;
To promote, suspend, discipline, or discharge employees;
To lay-off or relieve employees due to lack of work or funds or
for other legitimate reasons;
To make, publish, and enforce rules and regulations;
To introduce new or improved methods, equipment, or
facilities;
To contract out for goods and services;
To take any and all actions as may be necessary to carry out
the mission of the District in situations of civil emergency as
may be declared by the Board of Directors or Fire Chief;
To schedule and assign work;
To establish work and productivity standards.
Page 46
SECTION 2: Emergency Conditions
If in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors or Fire Chief it is
determined that extreme civil emergency conditions exist, including,
but not limited to riots, civil disorders, earthquakes, floods, or other
similar catastrophes, the provisions of this Agreement may be
suspended during the time of the declared emergency, provided that
wage rates and monetary fringe benefits shall not be suspended.
Page 47
ARTICLE VII. MAINTENANCE OF BENEHTS
All benefits enjoyed by the employees at the present time, which are
not included in nor specifically changed by this MOU, shall remain in
full force and effect; provided, however, that upon the mutual
agreement of the parties, the meet and confer process may be
initiated to address proposed changes. This Article shall not be
interpreted as affecting any other rights or obligations the respective
parties have under Section 3500 et. seq. of the California Government
Code.
Page 48
ARTICLE VIII. APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Am
This MOU is subject to approval by the Board of Directors of the
District. The parties hereto agree to perform whatever acts are
necessary both jointly and separately to urge the Board to
approve and enforce this MOU in its entirety. Following
approval of this MOU by the Board, its terms and conditions
shall be implemented by appropriate ordinance, resolution, or
other lawful action.
Page 49
ARTICLE IX. PROVISIONS OF LAW
It is understood and agreed that this MOU and employees are
subject to all current and future applicable Federal and State
laws and regulations and the current provisions of the District
law. If any part or provisions of this MOU is in conflict or
inconsistent with such applicable provisions of those Federal,
State, or District enactments or is otherwise held to be invalid
or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such
part or provision shall be suspended and superseded by such
applicable law or regulations, and the remainder of this MOU
shall not be affected thereby. If any substantive part or
provision of this MOU is suspended or superseded, the parties
agree to re-open negotiations regarding the suspended or
superseded part or provisions with the understanding that the
total compensation to employees under this MOU shall not be
reduced or increased as result of this Article.
The District and the Union recognize that under this Agreement
and in personnel matters not covered in this contract, the
current District Personnel Rules as amended and effective shall
apply. The Personnel Rules applicable to this bargaining unit
shall not be changed for the duration of this Agreement.
Page 50
ARTICLE X. TERM
The term of this MOU shall commence on and will
continue for a period thereafter, ending on In
the event either party hereto desires to negotiate a successor MOU,
such parties shall serve upon the other, during the month of
February, its written request to commence negotiations as well as
any written proposal for such successor MOU. Upon receipt of such
written proposals, negotiations shall begin no later than thirty (30)
calendar days after such receipt.
Dated
Dated
Union
District
/SS