The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994/09/21 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. September 21, ~1994 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Calit~rnia 91730 City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councii'.member Diane Willi~ms, Councilmember Jack L~m, City Mar.:ager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda September 21, 1994 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. PAGE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Buquet , Alexander , Stout Williams , and Gutie~ez , B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Proclamation to Gilbert "Cisko' Guerra Jr. and Jennifer Jacketti Guerra for distinguishing themselves as the best Fast Draw Shooters in the world. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the week of September 19 through 25, 1994 as "Pollution Prevention Week" in Rancho Cucamonga. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the week of September 24 through 30, 1994 as Code Enforcement Week. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be lirnited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSFNT CALFNDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/24/94, 8/31/94 and 9/7/94; and Payroll ending 8/11/94 and 8/25/94 for the total amount of $4D13,396.71. City Council Agenda September 21, 1994 PAGE o Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 1994. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Bike Pathways, located on Tetra Vista Parkway, Church Street, Fourth Street, Greenway Corridor, Etiwanda Avenue, Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue, to be funded from Air Quality Improvement Grant, Account No. 14-4158-6028. RESOLUTION NO. 94-185 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BIKE PATHWAYS LOCATED ON TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, CHURCH STREET, FOURTH STREET, GREENWAY CORRIDOR, ETIWANDA AVENUE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Bike Lockers at the Civic Center, Corporate City Yard and Metrolink Station, to be funded from Air Quality Improvement Grant, Account No. 14-4158-7044. RESOLUTION NO. 94-186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BIKE LOCKERS, LOCATED AT THE CIVIC CENTER, THE CORPORATE CITY YARD, AND THE METROLINK STATION IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approving the submittal of Household Hazardous Waste Discretionary Grant Program to the California Integrated Waste Management Board. RESOLUTION NO. 94-187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCRETIONARY GRANT 10 16 18 22 24 28 29 City Council Agenda September 21, 1994 PAGE 3 10. 11. Approval of Banner Applications. Approval to execute contract (CO 94-972) for I'ounder's Day Parade services by World Wide Spectaculars, Incorporated dba Pageantry Productions, in the amount of $6,851.77, to be funded from Account No. 01-4532-3900. Approval to execute a Lease Agreement (CO 94-0;73) for use of a portion of Coyote Canyon School Sjte (Formerly Ruth Musser School Site) with Lewis Homes of California. Approval to execute Amendment No. 7 to the lease (CO 92-064) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Incorporated pertaining to terms and conditions of payment regading the Sports Complex expansion/special events lot. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Michael D. Brown and the City of Rancho Cucorr=onga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM MICHAEL D. BROWN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way bE:tween Jorge Contreras Orozco and Rosa Garay Orozco and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION QF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM JORGE CONTRERAS OROZCO AND ROSA GARAY OROZCQ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 30 32 35 37 42 43 44 45 City Council Agenda September 21, 1994 PAGE 12. 13. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Jerry A. Tronier, Lira Fae Tronier and Irene McCarrol and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM JERRY A. TRONIER, LITA FAE TRONIER AND IRENE MCCARROL AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Approval to execute an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, for Development Review 93-20, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak Street, submitted by Lee and Stires, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 94-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-20 (APN: 209-144-80) RESOLUTION NO. 94-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-20 46 47 48 50 51 City Council Agenda September 21, 1994 PAGE E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. CONSIDERATION OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO, 94-01 - CITY QF RANCHQ CUCAMQNGA - Consideration of various amendments to the Sign Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 536 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CrTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 QF THE RANCHO CUCAMQNGA MUNICIPAL 53 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITION USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM 'S PI ACE - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from May 4, 1994) CONSIDERATION QF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest Corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811- 56 through 60. (Continued from May 4. 1994) CONSIDERATION OF UPDATING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL PURSUANT TQ THE PROVISIONS OF THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974. CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 81000, ET SEQ 6O 88 City Council Agenda September 21, 1994 PAGE RESOLUTION NO. 80-049E A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL 89 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal requirements. The Chair will open public testimony. publication or posting the meeting to receive No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not testimony, although the Chair public input. legally require any public may open the meeting for No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINFSS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OPPOSING HR 1843 WHICH MAY REQUIRE ALL MOBILE HOME PARK DESIGNATIONS TO BE CHANGED FROM ADULT AND/OR SENIOR ONLY TO ALL FAMILY DESIGNATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 94-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING HR 1843 CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLTUION IN SUPPORT OF THE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 91 92 93 City Council Agenda September 21, 1994 PAGE 7 RESOLUTION NO. 94-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PLANNfNG AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAM TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECfES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 106 J. IDFNTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NFXT MEFTING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMFNT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 15, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA LIST OF VARIANTS FOR PERIOD: 08-26-94 (96/95) eVENBOB NAME emmmmmmmmmmmeemmmmmmememmmemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmem ITEM DESCRIPTION WARM NO WARR. ANT, 3604 ECOFF, JILL 6535 FIRST MOTEL INVESTMENT CORPORATION 4105 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 149 KINGe LoB. 4256 UNOERUO00 CONSTRUCTION CO. 6S29 OALIA'S Z A · A EQUZPHENT RENTALS CO., ZNC. 4335 AFFORDABLE HYDRAULICS 669 ALCORN FENCE COMPANY 4ZOT ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO. 4322 ALL AROUNO PEST · TERMITE 264 ALPHA 8ETA IT ALTA FIRE EQUIPHENT CO, 2299 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANYe INC SODS ANAROS BY CHAMPION 141 BANK OF AHERICA-CORPORATE 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 1339 BIG A AUTO PARTS 124T BLAKE PAPER CODe INC. )T3 ROOK PUBLISHING COMPANY 6538 80URLANOe KELLY 6531 BOYDe ANNE 4328 BRADFORD MOUSE TRAVEL CENTER 3193 BRUNICKe ALVAREZ · BATTER·BY ZZSe C E O 481 CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN 490 CHEVRON U SAe 3tie CMZNO HILLS TRANSMISSION 73 CITRUS NOTORS ONTARIOe INC. 74 CITY RENTALS 264· COBB GROUP ZNCee THE 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 4119 COHPETITIVE EDGE CYCLERY 4022 CONPETROL MFGoe INCo 643 COHPUTERLANO 4316 COKPORATE EXPRESS 4169 CLOWN TROPHIES · MEDALS 85 CUCAHONGA CO WATER DIST 239 O L K CONCRETE CO 2512 D.A.R.E. AREMICA 214 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, ZNC 6540 OANIELSe STEPHEN 6532 OATA SYSTEMS GROUP 3491 DEALERS AUTO TRIM PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT MASTER PLAN STROM DRAIN FINGERPRINTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PKOGRESS ESTIHATE LIBRARY BOARD INTERVIEWS VEHICLE MAINTeNANCE/SUPpLIeS SUPPLIES/SERVICE MAINTENANCE REPAIRS INSTALLATION/SERVICE PROFESSZOHAL SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES SERVICE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCe SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ENGRAVED PLAQUE AONZNZSTRATION FEES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND AIRLINE RESERVATIONS BOOKING FEES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES HEOICAL PREMIUM GASOLINE CHARGES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION HENERA· VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPAIR MAINTENANCE REPAIRS/SUPPLiES COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES HONTHLT MATER BILLINGS STREET MAINTENANCE D. AoR.Ee HATERZAL OFFICE SUPPLIES PLANNING Fee REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REPUNO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE $S CHECKR OVERLAP s 8eOSSe 568.90 88056 - 88159 861605 20e6SZ.ZZ- 88161 - 88424 884250 32.00- 88426 - 89033 S 89034, 15o67R.00 19035 - 89393 · 93945 16eSSl.36 89395$ 83.00 89396 - 89391 S 89391 513.36 s 89399 267.25 99400 20652o00 09401 360.62 89402 690.S0 89403 15.33 89404 ItS,X6 S 89405 58.08 S 19406 631.51 · 89407 489o19 89408 1,755.33 · 89409 221.58 89410 81.89 89411 36.31 89412 1,314.63 89413 16.00 89414 25,00 S 89415 Ie88Y.O0 · 89416 3ZToB4 · 89417 10555.31 89418 240603.19 19419 75.96 · 19420 ZeSZIoTY 1942X 183.42 89422 49046 69423 49°00 89424 22,06 i 89425 82025 89426 103,47 # 89427 5,542.88 09428 1e200.34 89429 18244,50 89430 - 89435 · 89436 37tBIO.BO 89437 475,99 89438 1e799o75 89439 ZO.6I 894,40 217.50 19441 ZOoO0 89442 85.00 CITY OF RANCNQ CUCAHONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PeRiODS 08-24-94 C94/953 RUN DATE: 0R/24194 PAGE: 2 VENDOR bANE iTEN DeSCRiPTiON NARR NO bARRo ANT. 1962 DURA ART STONE 6533 DTNAXZON INC. S23 EASTNAN, INC 3604 ECQFFs JiLL 6534 ENGe NATALIe 3707 ,SOIL CORPORATZQN 2121 FARR'S - RANCHQ CUCANONGA 124 PENCe CRAFT OF UPLANDs INC. 2391 PILNS INCORPORATED eNTERTAINRENT 2397 FIRST SOLUTIONS 3902 FOOTHILLS PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES 3002 FRANKLIN QUEST 6536 FLESH PEACHES CORPORATION 3181 FRISK SOFTbARe iNTERs 3405 FUN CORNER 6537 PYRe, LAUREN 2155 GZULeA, VASZLe 744 GREAT bESTeRR SAVINGS I900 GRIFPZTH RAOXATOR SALES I37 GTE CALIFORNIA 959 MIDGiNS, NARTX NAZNTENANCE SUPPLieS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES PETTY CASH ReZNBURSENENT RECREATION REFUNO PLAN CHECK OFFICE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECReATiON SUPPLieS/SERVICES COMPUTER SUPPLiES/RENTAL PROFESSZONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND LICENSE RENENAL OFFICE SUPPLIES ReCReATiON REFUND CASH AOVANCE DEFERRED CONP VEHiCLe NAiNTENANCE HONTNLT TELEPHONE BILLINGS C e S A NEeTZNGS 3633 HONeLeSS OUTReACH PRGNS & eDUCATiON HONTHLT SERVICES 36[ HOYT LUBBER COos IZ750 HUGHES ROOFING iNC. 495 NTORO-SCAPe PRODUCTS, XNC I03 X C N A ReTIReMENT TRUST-4ST II2i ZNOEPeNOeNT eLECTRONICS 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 1952 INLAND eMPIRE STAGES, LTD. 45 iNLAND PACTORS 907 ZNLAND NeDZATZON BOARO 92 iNLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLeTiN 61Z JAESCHKe ZNCos 12756 JENKINS, SALLY i129 JdP TeLECON XNCo IZTS4 KoHOVNANZAN AT HIGHLAND VINEYARDS [79 KAISER FOUNOATION HEALTH PLAN i49 KING, LeD. 4329 KiNGs PATRICK 1218 KNOX 4005 KRUZe L KRUZE CONSTRUCTION L END. 518 KUHNs MARY 393 LAXRO CONSTRUCTION CO 849 LAMSON PRODUCTS, XNCo 2351 LEAGUe OF CALiFORNiA CITIES 3[56 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE, [NCe 4i79 LUJANs GLORY 12753 NCNUIRAT CONSTRUCT:ONe 2198 RXCHAeL'S CRAPTS 749 NZJAC ALARH CONPINY 12755 NT. BALDY UNITED MAY HAZNTENANCe SUPPLIES BUSINESS LZCeNSE REFUNO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCe SUPPLZES OEFERRED COMP MAINTENANCE MAiNTeNANCE SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION SERVICES NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES LANDLORD/TeNANT DISPUTE SUBSCRIPTIONS VEHiCLe NAXNTENANCE RECREATION REFUND TELEPHONE SERVICES OVERPAYMENT ON PERHITS NeOXCAL iNSURANCE PROFESSXONAL SeRViCeS iNSTRUCTOR PAYRENT NAZNTeNANCE SUPPLIES PROGRESS ESTZNATE e[ NATNTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSXONAL SERVICES NAZNTENANCe SUPPLIES MEeTiNG REGiSTRATiON OIL ANALYSIS CASH AOVANCE DEPOSIT REFUND RECREATZON SUPPLIES ALARM SERVICES 94/95 CAHPAZGN CHECKI OVERLAP I 89443 I0312.40 894~4 138.t5 I 894~5 377028 · 89446 75.00 · 894~1 60.00 89448 lOe4T5.O0 89449 37.66 89450 32.06 89451 27[.00 · 89452 531.76 89453 ISO.O0 e 89454 116.90 89455 45.75 89456 175.00 89457 SO.O0 89458 30.00 89459 12.00 89460 89461 78050 · 89462 4s]17.93 89463 44.94 89464 140.00 89465 45.26 89466 10.45 I 89467 6I.ZZ 89468 1e256000 89469 393.00 I 894T0 687.31 89471 265.00 89472 · 89473 18793o02 89474 26088 R 89475 186.36 89476 27.50 89477 18009.03 89478 25.00 89479 26,305e41 89480 850°00 89461 379000 I 89482 300.89 · 89483 13,164.98 I 69484 23076 I 69485 11,433.30 · 89486 613.81 · 89487 40.00 89488 81.2I 89489 300,00 89490 leO00.O0 89491 32077 I 89492 IN210.00 89493 ZO.O0 CITY OF RANCHO ~uCANQNGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 08-24-96 (94/953 mmmmmmm~~mmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmm~mmmmmmm~mmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~mmmmmmm~mmmmmmmm RUN DATER 08/24/94 PAGE~ 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARRS~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmNmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmNmmmmmmmmmmmmmm NARRo AMTo $$ CMECKI OVERLAP 12152 NAILS mBm U BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89494 18.00 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 89495 I7T,54 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES s 89496 ITt,OT 3693 NATIONUIOE MOBILE HONE REHAM. PROGRAM 89497 lmSOY.O0 2319 NCR CORPORATION NAINTENANCE CONTRACT 89498 145.00 840 NORTH AMERICAN TINESHARE/UNITED COMPUTER MAINTENANCE e 89499 1m440,00 3546 NURSERYLANO LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES s 89500 51o82 3632 OLOTIMERS FOUNDATION OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 99501 110.36 12751 OMEGA TILE-CON OUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89502 13.51 67 ON-CALL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLy SERVICES 69503 33°50 235 OMEN ELECTRIC NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES ; BDS04 532.46 818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES 89~5 13o90 2987 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS MONTHLY SERVICE g 89506 581.35 I079 PHOTO MOUSE OF CALIFORNIA PHOTO SUPPLIES I 89507 342.23 255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CQ VEHICLE MAINTENANCE g SUPPLIES # 89508 8,835.72 3952 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL QF CHURCHES bEST END HUNGER PROGRAM 89509 744.QQ 3286 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL NEDZCAL/OZSAeILITT INSURANCE 8951Q 59eQ34.65 2t76 QUAORANT SYSTENSm INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 89511 45Q.OQ 3663 R L T SPECIALTY, INC. D.A.R.e. SUPPLIES 99512 35S.32 419 n M A GROUP SOIL TESTING SERVICES d 89513 50696.5Q BOSS RAMADA HOTEL AIRPORT EAST HOTEL RESENT-ORACLE TRAINING 89514 16Q.59 8056 RAMADA INN MISSION VALLEY HOTEL RESENT-ORACLE TRAINING 89515 192.93 8057 RANIREZm ROSE RECREATION REFUNDS 89516 TS.OO 2257 RAUL'S AUTO TRINm INC. VEHICLE REPAIRS R 89517 591.64 545 RED WING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS 89518 lm3OZo61 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS # 69519 797.95 4ZS7 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROGRESS'ESTIMATE # 69520 136,390.05 4ZST RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROGRESS ESTIMATE # 69521 37Im035.7I 4140 ROAD MACHINERY, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89522 Im296.23 8060 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMBERSHIP DUES 89523 300.00 261 SAN BERN CO PRINTING L NAIL SVC PRINTING & NAIL SERVICES 89524 5°00 5lI SAN 8ERNARDINO COUNTY CAL-ID PROGRAM 89525 IT.S0 132 SAN OIEGO ROTARY 8ROOM COw INC HAIRY SUPPLIES 89526 334,03 1375 SCAnTNON CORPORATION CONTRACT MINERAL 89527 620.00 1105 SEAL FURNITURE L SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 89528 100.00 3196 SENECHAL, CAL iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 89529 58°50 2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES I 89530 lmtZZ.eZ 1327 SMART L FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES I 8953I 364o50 (<( 89532 - 89532 ))) 3iT SO CALIF EDISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS · 89533 72mO53,DZ 317 SO CALIF EDISON CO, MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 89534 2m004,64 319 SO CALIF GAS CO. MONTHLY GAS RILLS · 89535 453.64 135 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDmINC REGISTRATION 89536 XmOOI.OO ((( 69537 - 89545 ))) 143Z SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC 6ILLS. S 89546 11e063,77 322 SPARKLEITS MONTHLY SERVICE 89547 37,00 2847 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL NONTee INC. SERVICE AND SUPPLIES 89548 61o20 3597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL RENT-TRANSFER SITE 89549 ImGO0.O0 1151 TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES I 89550 514.~0 944 TEKTRONIX, INC. COMPUTER SUPPLIES 89551 696.00 3833 TELE-CONP-PLUS COMPUTER SUPPLIES 69552 1,260.00 CITY OF RANCNQ CUCANQNGA LIST OF NANRANTS FOR PERIOD: 08-2,-96 (9,/95) RUN DATE: 08/26/96 PAGE: · VENOQR NANE ITEM DESCRIPTZQN NARR NO NARR. ANT. 428Q TIE/CQNNUNXCATZONS, INC. 592 TISDALE, LARRY 569 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, $058 TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY 693 UeS./WHZTE VAN BATTERY COop INC. ZRSR UNPS ARE US ASSOCIATION Z733 UNZGLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL 3912 UNIQUE CREATIONS 2998 VASQUEZB CAROL 3&22 VIKING OFFICE FROOUCT$ 667 VISA 2OSZ MAGNER PACIFIC INCo ZI3 MAXXE, RLEEN-LINE CORP 8059 WESTERN CONTINENTAL FINANCIAL 2XO WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, [NC 509 XEROX CORPORATION PHONE SERVICE iNSTRUCTOR PAYNENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPPLIES HOTEL RESERV-CYBORG TRAINING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES UHP SERVICES CONOEX REETING RECREATION SUPPLIES CYBORG FAYROLL TRAINING OFFICE SUPPLIES VISA NONTHLY BILLINGS SURVET SERVICES HAZNT SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS HAINT SUPPLIES COPY HACHZNE SUPPLIES/SERVICE ** CHECKI OVERLAP i 89553 1,200o00 89556 930°00 89555 1e067o81 J 89556 1,0Z1.10 · 89557 2ZZ.70 89558 152o00 · 89559 22~o50 89560 91o46 89561 250.00 89562 102oll · 89563 lOZ.8/ · 89564 1,156.00 69565 593,02 89566 lZoO0 99567 767.23 89568 73.75 ** TOTAL 882,986.67 CiTY OF RANCHO CUr ~NGA LiST OF HARM. FOR PERIOD: 08-~ (94195) mww·emwm"memwmwmwmmemwwwwwmmwwwwmmWmmmwmwewwmem me · · · · ·wm · ·w am ·eweam RUN DATE% 08131/96 FAGEl I ' VENDOR NAME m · maw m · · · · · me mmmw·wwwmmwwwmwmwmmm~mmww·ewmwmmwwmmmmmw·mmwwe·m· ITEM OESCRIPTIQd WARM NO WARN. ANTE- 1 962 6554 1826 1826 6541 6542 2411 6543 402 6544 33 6545 2067 555 6546 4353 1011 142 1166 552 457 1223 3305 68 3622 13 949 4301 130 643 1094 4316 3331 239 4240 902 902 107 640 523 459 6547 1258 6548 6549 229 2121 155 A & A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.· INC. A T L T ANUNADAe ALEX AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR ANUBAe RODENT APARZCZOS HOTEL ARAGONe SALLY ARREGUXIe OARLENE AUTO RESTORATORS 6ARTMOLONENe LINOA eASELINE TRUE VALUE NARDNARE BEJARANOe JANET EENOER & CO, XNC, e MATTHEN RENEFIELOe KINGSLEY BlANCHIe SCOTT BOAMANe CAPTDRZA 60LIN NAINT, ~ JANITORXALe JOHN 8RAOFOROe HAROLD BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 8URK-BLACKSCHLEGERe ROSEANN C g E LUMBER CO CALIFORNIA SENSOR CORPORATION CARDE PACIFIC CORPORATION CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CITRUS MOTORS ONTAR[Oe INC, CLARKe KAREN CORP USA COMPUTER SERVICE CO COMPUTERLAND COOK/ARTHUR/NCee BUSINESS PROD. CORPORATE EXPRESS CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST CUNERTYt ANNA O & K CONCRETE CO DARTNELL CORPORATZONe THE DEPT., OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION OETCO ORESCO REPRODUCTIONS EASTMANe INC EGGHEAD SOFTWARE ELORIOGEe 8, ELLZSe JANA EMREe YUKSEL EMIlQUEll EILEEN EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS FARR'S - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FILARSKY L WATT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS CYGORG PATROLL TRAINING CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS RECREATION REFUND HOTEL RESERVATIONS SEWS MTG INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFUND PARKING CITATION OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT JANZTORIAL SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PHI MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFICE/MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/VEHICLE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY PAYMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLiES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SIGNAL MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLIES COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLiES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY WATER IILLINGS iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT STREET MAINTENANCE SUBSCRIPTION TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES/EQUiPMENT RECREATION REFUND REFRESHMENTS/SUPPLiES C,E.R.T. RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND IRRIGATION SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY SERVICES ** CHECKe 19605 OVERLAP 89572 61.18 89573 1o55 89514 250.00 89575 347.11 89576 651,56 89571 7,50 89578 107.26 89579 394.20 89580 29,50 89581 467.79 89512 16.25 89583 20.23 89584 30.06 89585 98.16 89586 291.00 89567 45,00 89588 45.00 69 589 1Se 818.00 89590 83016 89591 4ZO,TS 89 592 2e614,84 69593 409.62 89594 62el26.49 89595 961e,38 89S96 1e156.75 89597 400.00 89598 361.45 89599 179.5Z 89600 290.00 89601 4e/Z3090 89602 2e281,45 89603 850.00 89604 I e349.64 89605 89606 30e900,33 19607 151.80 89606 501.03 89609 118.82 69610 2e609.14 89611 79632.17 89612 100.75 69613 240.71 89614 613.66 19615 18496,66 89616 29.50 89617 150.00 69618 29.90 69619 23.60 89620 223.60 89621 103.12 89622 2e475.00 CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA LIST OF NANRANTS FOR PERIOD: 08-31-94 (94/953 RUN DATE; 08/31194 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRZPTZQd NARR NO NARR. ANTe 1 6535 FIRST HOTEL INVESTMENT CORPORATION 2140 FORD OF UPLAND, INC. 6550 GEORGE, KEYIN 4045 GLASS. OAR 1345 GONSALVE$ & SON, JOE Ao 6551 GOODMIN, NENDT 6~52 GRAVEL, CAROL 491 GRAVES AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY I3T GTE CALIFORNIA t3757 HAMILTON, KRIS 12758 HANEY, $TEVEN Pe (KYLE) 4270 HART[ELL, REGINA 4321 NEEMSTRA SIGNS 3334 NEILIG, KELLY 3458 HEINe PAT 2069 HEYDEe DONALD Lo 958 MIGGZNS, MART[ 958 HIGGINS, MARTI 437 HINDERLITER, de LLAMAS C ASSOCIATES 2612 WOYT, RAYMOND 3436 HUNT, LUANNE 6143 I P S SERVICES 4143 I P S SERVICES 12759 JACKSON, CALVIN I829 JNP TELECOM ZNCe 3963 KEATS, MARY ANN 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY ~2761 KLEIN, 6EN 12760 KLEIN, LAUREN IT2 KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE 321 LANDSCAPE NEST 4332 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT, INC. 4178 LONCARf PHIL 1455 LONG'S DRUGS 3668 LOME, JAMES 600 LYNCHe JANIE 956 MAC DONALD, lAIN 4023 NAGNUSON, PETE 6553 RAIN PHOTO SERVICE 250 MARTZNEZ UNION SERVICE 3015 RC CALL. SUSAN 3057 MILLS, MART 3960 NOLOHEY, JIM 3333 MOTTe SYLVIA lOZO MOUNTAIN VlEU GLASS L MIRROR 12763 NOUSSAVIt SARAH 6539 MR. C'S PIZZA 3431 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE 4034 NICHOLS, FRED 3716 NORHElM, HAROLD MASTER PLAN STROM DRAIN VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT LEGISLATIVE SERVICES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT VEHICLE HAINTENANCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT S E N S MEETING S E M S MEETING SALES TAX AUDIT SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PHT 93/94 PAVEMENT RENAB. 93/94 PAVEMENT REHAO, RECREATION REFUNO$ TELEPHONE SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PAPER SUPPLIES RECREATIdN REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS IN$TRUCTOl PAVNENT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE RECREATION EQUIPMENT C.E.R.T, INSTRUCTOR FIL~ PROCESSING INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT REGISTRATION FEE TOMING SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNOS PLANNING FEE REFUND UNIFORM SERVICES ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PATRENT · e CHECK8 OVERLAP 89623 20e65Z.22 t 89624 350853 I 896z5 59.00 89626 loo.oo 69627 ZeiO0.O0 89628 29.50 69629 59.00 89630 124.31 89631- 89631 8 89632 1,132.75 89633 200,OO 89634 ZO.O0 89635 96.00 89636 480.00 89631 849.40 89638 158.40 89639 262.50 89660 SO.OO 89641 6.05 I 89642 7e/t/.09 89643 2,346.,63 89646 153.,00 I 89645 61,519.27 I 89646 156,467.65 89647 lS.O0 · 89648 1,294.93 19649 110.10 89650 17.12 89651 45.00 89652 45.00 89653 904.50 t 89654 12,540.14 89655 250.52 89656 100.00 89651 53.86 89658 170.50 89659 38.,08 89660 620,00 89661 too.Do I 89&&Z 250.00 896~3 40.00 89664 48.60 89665 292,50 89666 320.00 89667 108.00 69668 95.04 89669 2.36 89670 225.00 I 89611 456.05 I 89672 leS/Z.OO 89613 lOO.O0 CIIY OF RANCNO CUr'-qNGA LIST OF MARR FOR PERIOD: 08-~ (96/953 VENOOR NAME emee~emeeeem ' ITEM DESCRIPTION HARM NO 527 OLYMPIC STUDIOS, ZNC. 232 OMNITRANS 396& ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 4223 PAPER DIRECT. INCa 757 PEP 80YS 3444 PERFECTION PRESS 191 PHI/DELTA CARE 2719 PONCMAUDt JANICE 4159 PRENTZS, BETH 65 PRUOENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLT 4335 PUBLIC AGENCY RiSK SHARING AUTH 418 R M A GROUP 8061 RAMSDELL, ROBERT 3821 RE-PRiNT CORPORATION 3432 RXDD, LZNOA 276 RZVERSXOE 6LUEPRINT 4160 ROAD MACHINERY, INCa 626 NOBLES, MAUL P., SRe 6062 ROMERO,JR.e ALFRED0 20e& SAFECO LIFE INS. CO. GROUP ADHIN. 4255 SAFMAT STEEL PRODUCTS 3958 SALVIATZ, HAlTHA )05 SAN BERN COUNTY TRANSPORTAT[ON/FLO 3067 SAUL, SANDY 535 SEMPLE, JUDY 8063 SHERIDAN, CARl 4313 SKATE EXPRESS 1327 SMART L FINAL 319 SO CALIF GAS CO. 1,32 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 391 SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS 4192 SPAXN,JReNILLIAM V. 646 STANDARD INSURANCE CO, 234~ TARGET [1SI TECHNXC 2716 TERRY, DONNA 3181 TMROCKMORTON, MARCELA 6316 TORRES, LAUIA 341 TRANS-MEST FORD TRUCK 8058 TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY 6051 TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY 8058 TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY 8058 TRAVEL TECHNOLOGY 6333 TAX-STATE FiRE PROTECTION CO. 2737 U-C. REGENTS 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 4256 UNDERNO00 CONSTRUCTZON 8066 VILLAROe JAMES Eo 667 ViSA 1103 VISTA PAXNT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BUS PASSES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES MEDICAL INSURANCE ZNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 2NO QUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT SOIL TESTING SERVICES RECREATION REFUNDS OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PRINTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES TiRE REPAIR RECREATION REFUNDS MEDICAL iNSURANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT AGREEMENT IGLOO0 CONTROL iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUNDS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT DAV CAMP SUPPLIES MONTHLY OAS DZLLS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS MONTHLY COMPUTER CONTRACT C.E.RoTo INSTRUCTOR INSURANCE PREMIUM YOUTH PROGRAM L DAY CAMP $UPPL OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT iNSTRUCTOR PATRENT XNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT VEHICLE NAXNT SUPPLIES HOTEL RESERV-CYBORG TRAINING HOTEL RESERV-CTBORG TRAINING MOTEL RESERV-CTDORG TRAiNiNG HOTEL IESERV-CYBORG TRAINING FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE POCKET GUIDE UMP SERVICES PROGRESS ESTIMATE CZTATION REFUND ViSA MONTHLY BILLINGS MAXNT SUPPLIES ** CHECKS OVERLAP 89676 1.158o90 69675 176.00 89676 835°20 8967~ 46.90 69678 29.89 e 89619 216.63 89680 795.60 69681 191.40 89682 96.50 I 89683 6.18 8968~ 82,993oT5 · 89685 2,709a00 89616 29.50 89681 85.64 09688 45.00 89689 66.63 I 89690 259.03 89691 45.50 19692 610.00 89693 57.57 I 89694 2,973.46 89695 225.00 89696 12~.26 89691 261.50 I 89696 325.68 89699 59.00 89700 272°00 # 89701 214.18 89102 25.00 89703- 897o4 I 89705 63.696016 89~06 575.00 89707 262.50 89708 594.00 I 89709 159.56 89710 245.00 89111 240.00 89112 258.00 89713 105.00 89714 291.42 89715 20Za2~, 89716 202.2~ 89117 ~0~.48 69118 ~04.41 69719 121.39 · 9720 305.00 6 89121 1e7~9.50 69122 3,191.60 R9723 5.00 · 89724 264.6~ 89725 122.92 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 08-31-96 C94/95) RUN DATES 08/31/9~ PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO MARR. ANT° el CHECKI OVERLAP 1941 MESTERN TURF C COMMERCIAL NAINT SUPPLIES 89726 49.5T 365 MNITNEY HACHZNERT MAZNT SUPPLIES 89127 80.36 8065 NILLIARS, ROSE RECREATION REFUNDS 89128 59.00 4184 NZLLZANSON & SCHMZD ENGINEERING SERVICES 89729 436.60 872 HITTER, JOANNE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 89730 330.00 2901 MOLFEw OUANE Lo INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 89731 lOO.O0 615 NVNN'S FROSTEMP/MAXAZR VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES 89132 345.92 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 89733 562.37 8066 YOKOYANOw HOLLY RECREATION REFUNDS 69134 29.50 311 ZEE REOZCAL SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES 09735 33.94 TOTAL 611e363.11 CITY OF RANCHQ C' ~NGA LIST OF MARl FOR PERIOOI 09-~. ,4 (94lIB) mmmmemmemmmeemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm m ~ mN m m mm N RUN DATEI 0~/08196 PAGE: l """"" ""' " ''" ' .... """""' mmm~mmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ' WARR, ANT, 3364 I 4298 3185 IB26 3529 1135 264 24 43Z5 2437 1061 47 IlBl 1241 3301 64ml 3IIm 73 643 826 4316 IS 3SS 4339 839 3179 1962 523 3614 229 6555 6556 144 I900 131 12767 21SS 462 12771 151 2255 12763 I234 16I IZT69 495 I03 89T eth AVENUE GRAPHZCS A & A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.m ABC SERVICES ACTION ART ABeTOUCH CELLULAR ALAn GLASS ALI~MENT & BRAKE SPECIALISTS ALPHA BETA ARBOR NURSERY INC. ASSOCIATED DIESEL ASSOCIATED PLANTSCAPERSm ZNC. AWAIOS IV CHAMPION BELL & HOWELL DIG A AUTO PARTS BLAKE PAPER COot INto CANOE PACIFIC CORPORATION CAnOEMASt CATHERINE CHINO HILLS TRANSMISSION CITRUS NOTORS ONTARXOm INCo COMPUTERLAND COMPUTERVISION CORPORATION CORPORATE EXPRESS CUCANONGA CO WATER OIST OANXELS TIRE SERVICE OEAN'S GREENS NURSERY OZETERZCN INTERNATIONAL TRUCK OOBNZNGt GLENN Do DUMA ART STONE EASTMAN, XNC ELITE TONING EMING IRRIGATION PROOUCTS GAGNONe GARY GLEOSON/CASNNAN CONSTRUCTION GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS GRIPPITH RAOIATOR SALES GTE CALIFORNIA HARDDREW HAVEN WINE i LIQUOR CO. NCS-CUTLER STEEL HERHARe SANORA HOLLIOAY ROCK CO., INC. HOLT°S AUTO ELECTRIC HONEMOOD SUITES HOSENAN HOYT LUMBER CODe SoNo HTATT REGENCY CHICAGO HTORO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, XNC I C n A RETIREMENT TRUST-4ST I F S SEEVICES X.C.I.O. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUppLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE SUPPLIES/MAINTENANCE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE ENGRAVED PLAQUE PROFESSIONAL SERVZCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE/VEHICLE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPpLiES COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUppLIES MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES ((( 19764 MONTHLy WATER BILLINGS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE L SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES TOWXNG SERVICE IRRIGATION SUPPLIES CLAIM SETTLEMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND DEFERRED CONP VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND SUB-COMMITTEE MEETINGS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES HOTEL RESERVATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES XCNA MEETING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OEFERREO CONP 93/94 PAVEMENT REHAB, ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES $$ CHECKR OVERLAP 89742 56056 89743 157.89 89744 3m358.39 89165 14,2.23 89146 122,90 89747 89748 385.80 89749 23,48 89750 161.02 89751 278,60 89152 lme13031 89753 323.25 89754 31,25 89155 38061 89756 1Z5o90 R97S7 ZSOoZ9 697S6 20.70 89159 816.78 89760 679.92 89761 8976Z S · 593.06 89763 15.60 89766 B9767 63 e 586°63 89766 313.12 89769 69.51 89770 70,86 89171 130.92 89 772 586.16 89773 461.66 89774 107.00 89775 25.73 89776 157.21 89177 101.00 89776 5e478000 89779 293.08 89780 860.66 89781 10.50 89182 10.16 89783 283.39 89784 17070 89785 58.02 89786 110.96 89187 246.42 89788 69.0Z 89789 305,28 89790 360.00 89791 840.96 89792 1,276,86 89793 lO e314.00 19794 lBO.O0 CXTY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA LiST OF NANRANTS FOR PERBOO: 09-07-94 Ct4/tl) RUN DATE: 09/08/96 PAGE: 2 VENDOR MAne ITEM DESCRIPTION UARR NO .-------.,...-.._.._........... .... ..... ........ me CHECK· OVERLAP 6& iNDUSTRiAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES B 89795 526.Z3 :'iS& INOUSTBIAL ·RUSH CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89796 499.90 iETDS ZNLANO ACOUSTICS inC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89797 40.50 ZBS:, iNLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 89798 Ie432.00 45 iNLAND FACTORS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 89799 2X0.97 3185 iNLAND LAMNNOMER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 89800 12.10 iZ7T4 ZNTERNAT'L SOCIETY OF*ARBORICULTURE ANNUAL FEES 89801 25.00 3919 INTOXZNETERS, INCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89802 5)8.75 612 JAESCNKE INC.t CoR. VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE · eBeO3 i,OzO.lO 6557 JiB DANDY iNTERNATiONAL BUSINESS LiCeNSE REFUND 89804 34.00 Z607 JNP iNPORRATION SYSTEMS TELECORHUNZCATTON SERVICES t 89805 943.34 609 KARlNEe STEXNER · URGEBEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 89806 2,000°00 2611 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 89807 Z,T43.II 107 KING lEANING INCH MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89808 SO8.XS l:,II KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 0 89809 386.63 339 LANe JACK LEAGUE MEETING 89810 ZO0.OO 949 LANSON PROOUCTSe iNC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 898IZ 164o45 I2764 LZANGe OEBIZE CASH AOVANCE 89812 ZSO.OO 145S LONG'S ORUGS FiLM PROCESSING 89813 62.88 2448 LUBRICATION ENGINEERS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89814 1,011.13 106:, N C I TELECONNUNICATZONS TELEPHONE SERVICES B 89815 458.44 12170 flASHEYe NiCHOLAS/VIRGinia RECREATION REFUND 89816 28.00 2555 HC ALLXSTER DESIGN DESIGN OF BUSINESS CARDS 89817 409.45 12112 NEHLTRETIER, MaRie RECREATION REFUND 89818 29.50 2191 RICHAEL'S CRAFTS RECREATION SUPPLIES 89819 63.89 12166 NILLER'S PIPEHORNS LANDSCAPING BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 69820 12o22 12773 RiLLERR RICK RECREATION REFUND 8982Z 30°00 12761 RYe BALOY UNITED MaY 9~/9S KICKOFF CARPAIGN 89822 40°00 3412 MURPHY & ASSOCZATESt Po PROFESSIONAL SERVICES · 89823 1,904o00 2248 NAPE AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 8 89826 405.57 4:,01 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89825 639.12 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFOR~ SERVICES · 89826 780.54 lOS/ PAYLESS SHOESOURCE e4969 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89827 107.12 331 PiCONE PLUMBING CORPORATION PLUHBXNG REPAIR L SUPPLIES · 89828 ZS6.~S 272 PITNEY BONES POSTAGE METER RENTAL 89829 300.08 43:'4 PLA:,A AUTO BODY SUPPLY VEHICLE REPAIR 89630 129.03 3286 PIZNCIPAL MUTUAL HEOXCAL/DISADZLITY INSURANCE 89831 60,782°94 · 335 PUBLIC AGENCY RiSK SHARING AUTH CA. ZNO QUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT 89832 18,272.00 4335 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTH CA. ZNO QUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT 69833 S9525.00 1038 a J R DESIGN GROUP, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 69834 1,586,74 40:'5 R J SUPPLY CO. HAXNTERANCE SUPPLIES 89835 280.15 · 18 R n A GROUP SOiL TESTING SERVICES B 89836 564.00 ZTOS ReHoFo, into VEHICLE HAIRY SERViCE&SUPPLIES · 19637 91.10 4130 IBM LOCK L KEY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 898)8 108.93 IO6l RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT FABRXCATORS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 89639 25.00 ZiG RIVERSIDE ILUEPRINT PRINTS · 89640 423°36 · 257 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PROGRESS ESTIMATE t 89841 645t757.91 6:'6 ROBLESe RAUL P., SR. TIRE REPAIR 8 89842 119.55 IOTO ROSAS, LiRXO CYBORG PAYROLL TRAINING 898~3 15o.oo 8071 RUNTANt NXCHELLE er JOSHUA RECREATION REFUNO 896~4 28.00 301 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE t 89645 632,370.00 CITY DF RANCHO C LEST OF MARRA. FOR PERIOD: 09-07-94 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmm RUN DATE: 09/08/94 PAGE: 3 ITEN DESCRI,TIO. N,RR N;"""""' ............... " ...... ' ..... mlmlmmmllmmllmmllmmMBlellmmllllmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmlm WARR. ANT. 3249 SAN IERNARDINO CQUNTT 33i3 SARTOI'S MOBILE NONE. PETE 4IZI SCHNARZE INDUSTRIES, INC. 2507 SIEIE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 35l SIGN $HOP. THE 692 SIR SPEEDY 319 SO CALIF GAS CO. X432 SOUTHElM CALIFORNIA EDISON 646 STANOAID INSURANCE CO. 3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4224 STREET SCENE BANNERS 136 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS B072 TENPORART UTILITY SERVICES 683 UoS./NNZTE VAN 8ATTERY CO,. INC, ZT3I UNIGLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL 499 VISION SERVICE ~A~ - 411 MAIIEN L CO.. CARL 4002 MASTE NANAGENENT ZNOUSTRXES lOT) MEEK. ANT 774 NESTEl CQNPUTER SERVICES. 267 NESTERN ROCK CO 345 UHITNET IqACNINERY 1069 NILSON · ASSOCIATES. 675 NTNN'S PROSTEHP/~AXAIR 3~8 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY FILING FEE REHA6 FROGRAN VEHICLE SUPPLIES SERViCE/SUPPLIES NAZNT SUPPLIES FAXES NONTHLT GAS BILLS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS INSURANCE PREMIUM UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE STREET BANNERS NAZNT SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES CONDEX NEETXNG H~[.iL~ VISION $EIVICE BILLING LIABILITy CLAIMS HASTE MANAGEMENT RECREATION REFUND COMPUTER SERVICE ASPHALT & CONCRETE NAINT SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REPUND VEHICLE NAINT SUPPLIES VEHICLE NAINT SUPPLIES II CHECKI OVERLAP 89646 30,00 8 89847 3.475.00 89648 T3,48 I 89849 1.653.06 89850 344.80 89851 127.29 8985Z Z03.08 89153- 89854 >>> I 89655 1.438.26 89856 215.00 19857 4.766.00 t 89658 420.23 # 89859 4,243.52 89860 Is. Q0 89861 57.2cj 89862 53J..00 89063 6,004.~Z 89864 679.20 89~65 54.40 89866 Z9.50 89667 ll .933.49 B 89868 SO0.O0 89669 85.71 89870 6.00 J 89871 273.86 89872 173.67 TOTAL 1,501e592.11 i I 4 I. I 09/15/1994 CITY OF RANCNO ~NGA PORTFOLIO MASTER S{Y AUGUST 31, 1994 CITY CASH AVERAGE -*-YIELD TOMATURITY--- PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365 INVESTMENTS BOOt< VALUE PORTFOLIO TERN MATURITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALENT Certificates of Deposit - Bank ............... $ Local Agency Investment Funds ................ $ Bankers Acceptances .......................... $ Federal Agency Issues - Coupon ............... $ Treasury Securities - Coupon ................. Treasury Securities - Discount ............... $ 14,619,566.50 32.85 327 155 3.635 3.685 12,085,297.16 27.15 1 1 4.757 4.823 4,879,930.56 10.96 182 85 4.866 4.934 5,496,250.00 12.35 628 507 5.620 5.698 534,499.35 1.20 708 622 5.599 5.677 3,350,881.16 7.53 358 251 4.829 4.896 Mortgage Backed Securities ................... $ 1,937,193.25 4.35 1,722 1,027 6.789 6.883 Small Business Administration ................ $ 1,101,562.50 2.48 9,131 6,171 8.184 8.298 Miscellaneous Securities - Discount .......... $ 501,904.00 1.13 10,048 7,288 8.315 8.430 TOT~ INVESTMEIFFS and AVERAGES ............. $ 44,507,084.48 100.00t 655 429 4.7361 4.8021 Passbook/Checking Accounts ................... $ 396,254.30 1.973 2.000 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase ................. $ 63,750.02 TOTAL CASH ................................... $ 460,004.32 TOTAL CASH and IlfVEST){ENTS ................. $ 44,967,088.80 MONTH ENDING FISCAL TOTAL EARNINGS A{N2UST 31 YEAR TO DATE Current Year $ 196,589.48 $ 380,629.15 I certify that this report accurately reflects all agency pooled investments and is in comformity with investment policy adopted July 20, 1994. A copy of this investment policy is available in the Finance Division of the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Proqram herein Shekm provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet next month's estimated expenditures. 09/15/1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS AUGUST 31, 1994 CITY CASH INVESTMENT PURCHASE STATED --- YTM --- MATURITY DAYS MUMBEN ISSUER DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK 00909 BA]~K OF AMERICA 07/26/94 00911 BANK OF AMERICA 08/25/94 00888 FOOTHILL INI)~ BAi{K 03/15/94 00871 GREAT WESTERN 11/08/93 00872 GRiT W~TERN 11/15/93 00881 GREAT WESTERN 01/20/94 00882 GREAT WESTERN 01/25/94 00883 GREAT WESTERN 02/01/94 00884 GREAT WESTERN 02/15/94 00885 GREAT WESTEPJ{ 02/22/94 00886 GREAT WESTERN 03/01/94 00891 GREAT WESTEP3 03/29/94 00898 GREAT WESTERN 05/12/94 00877 SANWA 01/04/94 00878 SA/NWA 01/04/94 00894 SANWA 04/29/94 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES LOCAL AGENCY 00005 00804 INVESTMENT FUNDS LOCAL AGHCY INVST FUND LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES BANKERS ACCEPTANCES 00902 DAI ICHI RANGYO BANK MY 05/27/94 FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON 00895 FEDERAi FARM CREDIT BANKS 00896 FEDERAL FARM CREDITBAMKS 00897 FEDERAL FARNCREDITBANKS 04/29/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES TREASURY SECURITIES - COUI~ON 00903 BANK OF AMERICA 06/08/94 00904 BA_NK OF AMERICA 06/07/94 00905 BAIQ< OF AMERICA 06/07/94 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES * - Reverse Repurchase Agreements are negative amounts. 1,791 645.50 127 921.00 500 000.00 1,000.000.00 500.000.00 1,700 000.00 500 000.00 500 000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,791,645.50 127,921.00 500,000.00 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 1,700,000.00 500000.00 500,000.00 500.000.00 500000.00 500 000.00 2,000.000.00 1,000 000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 14,619,566.54) 14,619,566.50 1,791 645.50 127 921.00 500 000.00 1,000,000.00 500.000.00 1,700 000.00 500 000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2.700 2.700 2.738 09/27/94 26 2.800 2.800 2.839 09/26/94 25 4.430 4.430 4.492 03/15/95 195 3.600 3.600 3.650 11/08/94 68 3.600 3.600 3.650 11/15/94 75 3.250 3.250 3.295 10/17/94 46 3.350 3.350 3.397 01/25/95 146 3.250 3.250 3.295 10/31/94 60 3.750 3.750 3.802 02/15/95 167 3.750 3.750 3.802 02/22/95 174 3.750 3.750 3.802 03/01/95 181 3.750 3.750 3.802 03/29/95 209 4.600 4.600 4.664 08/14/95 347 3.150 3.150 3.194 02/08/95 160 3.150 3.150 3.194 01/04/95 125 4.250 4.250 4.309 05/02/95 243 14,619,566.50 3.635 3.685 10,972,297.16 10,972,297.16 10,972,297.16 4.823 4.757 4.823 1 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 4.823 4.757 4.823 1 12,085,297.16 12,085,297.16 12,085,297.16 4.757 4.823 4,879,930.56 5,000,000.00 4,879,930.56 4.867 4.867 4.934 11/25/94 85 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.850 5.770 5.850 04/29/96 606 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5.160 5.089 5.160 05/01/95 242 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 5.850 5.870 5.952 04/29/96 606 5,496,250.00 5,500,000.00 5,496,250.00 5.620 5.698 507 272,845.00 277,000.00 272,845.00 6.141 6.571 6.662 08/31/97 1,095 210,151.24 217,000.00 210,151.24 4.600 4.720 4.786 02/09/95 161 51,503.11 52,000.00 51,503.11 4.000 4.039 4.095 09/01/94 0 534,499.35 546,000.00 534,499.35 5.599 5.677 622 11 09/15/1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS AUGUST 31, 1994 CITY CASH INVESTMENT PURCHASE ..... ........................... ...... TREASURY SECURITIES - DISCOUNT 00892 BANK OF AMERICA 00907 BANK OF AMERICA SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 04/13/94 1,913,085.56 2,000,000.00 1,913,085.56 4.370 4.518 4.581 04/06/95 217 06/30/94 1,437,795.60 1,515,000.00 1,437,795.60 5.040 5.241 5.314 06/24/95 296 3,350,881.16 3,515,000.00 3,350,881.16 4.829 4.896 251 MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES 00071 BANK OF AMERICA 02/23/87 82,561.90 84,761.94 442,907.10 8.000 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 2,68i 00203 B]LNK OF AMERICA 09/21/87 177,839.04 192,518.58 612,753.80 8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,846 00899 BANK OF AMERICA 05/12/94 1,485,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,485,000.00 3.790 6.136 6.221 02/24/95 178 00069 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS 07/01/87 36,096.27 35,384.43 84,710.58 9.000 8.515 8.634 03/15/01 2,389 00002 GIBRALTAR SAVINGS 07/01/87 155,696.04 157,866.71 663,389.28 8.500 8.631 8.751 05/15/01 2,450 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 00004 SMALL BUSINESS ADMIN wr~CELLAMEOUS SECURITIES - DISCOUNT 2 BANK OF AMERICA TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVERAGES 1,937,193.25 1,970,531.66 3,288,760.76 6.789 6.883 1,027 07/25/86 1,101,562.50 1,OOO,O00.O0 1,065,142.39 9.125 8.184 8.298 07/25/11 6,171 02/10/87 501,904.00 5,200,000.00 404,872.00 8.430 8.315 8.430 08/15/14 7,288 $ 44,507,084.48 49,436,395.32 45,725,199.88 4.736% 4.802% 429 * - Reverse Repurchase Agreements are negative amounts. 09/15/1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I~ESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - CASH AUGUST 31, 1994 CITY CASH I~ESTMEI~I PURCHASE STATED ---Y~--- MATURITY DAYS NUMBR ISSUER DATE }KX)K VALUE FACE VALUE MA, RKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS 00180 BANK OF ~RICA Accrued Interest at Purchase TOTAL CASH TOTAL CASH and I~ESTMENTS 396,254.30 2.000 1.973 2.000 63,750.02 $ 460,004.32 $ 44,967,088.80 13 09/15/1994 CITY OF RAMCHO CUCAMONGA PORTFOLIO MASTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE AUGUST 1, 1994 - AUGUST 31, 1994 CITY STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SALES/MATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT # ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWALS BALANCE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK BEGINNING BALANCE: 15,419,566.50 00910 BANK OF AMERICA 2.700 08/25/94 127,921.00 00911 BANK OF AMERICA 2.800 08/25/94 127,921.00 00870 GREAT WESTERN 3.500 08/08/94 300,000.00 00874 GREAT WESTERN 3.250 08/29/94 500,000.00 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 127,921.00 927,921.00 14,619,566.50 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND BEGINNING BALANCE: 14,509,297.16 4.863 2,400,000.00 4,824,000.00 4.823 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 2,400,000.00 4,824,000.00 12,085,297.16 CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS 00180 BANK OFAMERICA BEGINNING BALANCE: 837,799.30 2.000 3,060,548.00 3,502,093.00 396,254.30 BANKERS ACCEPTANCES BEGINNING BALANCE: 4,879,930.56 4,879,930.56 FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON BEGINNING BALANCE: 5,496,250.00 5,496,250.00 TREASURY SECURITIES - COUPON BEGINNING BALANCE: 534,499.35 534,499.35 TREASURY SECURITIES - DISCOUNT BEGINNING BALAMCE: 3,350,881.16 3,350,881.16 MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES 00071 BANK OF AMERICA 00203 BANK OF AMERICA 00069 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS 00002 GIBRALTAN SAVINGS SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE BEGINNING BAiJd{CE: 8.000 08/15/94 1,174.60 8.500 08/25/94 9,787.61 9.000 08/15/94 167.86 8.500 08/15/94 1,272.86 1,949,596.18 0.00 12,402.93 1,937,193.25 , - Reverse Repurchase Agreements are negative amounts. 14 09/15/1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PORTFOLIO MASTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE AUGUST 1, 1994 - AUGUST 31, 1994 PN - CITY CASH STATED TP, A/{SACTION PURCHASES SALES/MATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT # ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEBDSITS OR WITHDRAWALS BALANCE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION BEGINNING BALA/{CE: 1,101,562.50 1,101,562.50 MISCELLANEOUS SECURITIES - DISCOUNT TOTALS BEGINNING BALANCE: * - Reverse Repurchase Agreements are negative amounts. BEGINNING BALANCE: 501,904.00 501,904.00 $ 48,581,286.71 5,588,469.00 9,266,416.93 44,903,338.78 1S DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Ltnda Beek, Jr. Engineer AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" POR THE BIKE PATHWAYS, LOCATED ON TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, CHURCH STREET, FOURTH. STREET, GREENWAY CORRIDOR, ETIWANDA AVENUE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE, TO BE PUNDED PROM AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT, ACCOUNT NO. 14-4158-6028 It is reconmnended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Bike Pathways and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALySIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Bike Pathways, will be located on Tetra Vista Parkway, between Church and Mountain View; Church Street, Haven Avenue to Mill iken Avenue; Fourth Street, East City Limit to West City Limit; Greenway Corridor, East and West of Mill iken; Etiwanda Avenue, the Equestrian Trail, South of Highland Avenue connecting to Kalmia Street and Powell Street; Archibald Avenue, Fourth Street to Wilson Avenue and Haven Avenue Pourth Street to Wilson Avenue. The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, installation and construction of bike pathways, A.C. paving, signing and striping. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $68,847.50. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 77 and October 4, 1994, with the bid opening at 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, October 1994. Respectfully submitted, \ William j. O'Netl City Engineer WjO:LB:dlw Attac hmen t 16 ~, I I : , , iv (_lle 41 ST I · I 4 ,Im · · I · ..... IO F'RWY ONTARIO I "" NTS BIKE PATHWAY · LOCATIONS 1 CHURCH AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY 2 FOURTH STREET 3 ARROW ROUTE 4 5 TERRA VISTA GREENWAY CORRIDOR ETrWANDA AVENUE 6 ARCHIBALD AVENUE 7 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BIKE PATHWAYS LOCATED ON TERRA VISTA PA~<WAY, CHURCH STREET, FOURTH STREET, GREENWAy CORRIDOR, ETIWANDA AVENUE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVEN~JE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the pl arts and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "THE BIKE PATHWAYS LOCATED ON TERRA VISTA PA~WAY, CHURCH STREET, FOURTH STREET, GREENWAY CORRIDOR, ETIWANDA AVENUE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposal s for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shal 1 be substantial ly in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for the "THE BIKE PATHWAYS LOCATED ON TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, CHURCH STREET, FOURTH STREET, GREENWAY CORRIDOR, ETIWANDA AVENUE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. ' Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "THE BIKE PATHWAYS LOCATED ON TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, CHURCH STREET, FOURTH STREET, GREENWAY CORRIDOR, ETIWANDA AVENUE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevail ing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the 18 Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevail ing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency al so shal 1 cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed fo~ each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevail tng rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor unde~ him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journe3nnen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship co~nittee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenttcable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of' Industrial relations, 19 ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight {8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply '~ith and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said hid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent {100%) of the contract price for said work shall he given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will al so be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "C-32" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to re_iect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 215T day of SEPTEMBER, 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga California, this 215T day of SEPTEMBER, 1994. ' Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: SEPTEMBER 27 AND OCTOBER 4, 1994 21 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE BIKE LOCKERS AT THE CIVIC CENTER, CORPORATE CITY YARD AND METROLINK STATION, TO BE FUNDED FROM AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT, ACCOUNT NO. 14-4158-7044 RECOIkNENDATION: It is reconmnended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Bike Lockers and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The bike lockers are located at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive (stores 6 bikes); the Corporate City Yard, 9153 Ninth Street (stores 10 bikes) and the Metrol ink Station located between Jersey and Seventh Streets (stores 12 bikes). The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, installation of bike lockers, concrete pad, protective materials and other related items. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $34,910.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 27 and October 4, 1994, with the bid opening at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, October 28, 1994. '- Respectful 1 y submitted, Will tam J. O'N~t-T City Engineer WJO: LB: dl w Attac hmen t i~:i~;~ j_r'1 RANCHO CUC AMONGA ": ~ "' [ r'°°"'l ST I0 FI~WY ONTARIO ' · BIKE LOCKER LOCATIONS AND CAPACITY 2 3 CMC CENTER (6 BIKES) CORPORATE CITY YARD (10 BIKES) 1VfF,,TROLINK STATION (12 BIKES) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BIKE LOCKERS LOCATED AT THE CIVIC CENTER, THE CORPORATE CITY YARD, AND THE METROLINK STATION IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "BIKE LOCKERS LOCATED AT THE CIVIC CENTER, THE CORPORATE CITY YARD, AND THE METROLINK STATION". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposal s for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for the the "BIKE LOCKERS LOCATED AT THE CIVIC CENTER, THE CORPORATE CITY YARD, AND THE METROLINK STATION" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California g1730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the "BIKE LOCKERS LOCATED AT THE CIVIC CENTER, THE CORPORATE CITY YARD, AND THE METROL INK STATION". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevail trig rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,"10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contrac ti ng Agency al so shal 1 cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or partion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevail ing rate of wages heroinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concsrning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship conmnittee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to ~ive except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or 1 ocally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shal 1 comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standar,~s and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars {$25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashter's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashler's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent {10C)%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of cl aims for any material s or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form an~ class as required 5y any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "C-32" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mail ing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the woW~ contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in 1 ieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 215T day of SEPTEMBER, 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 215T day of SEPTEMBER, 1994. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: SEPTEMBER 27 AND OCTOBER 4, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 21, 1994 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager From: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Subject: HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCRETIONARy GRANT RECOMMENDATION Attached is a copy of a Resolution authorizing the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prepare, submit and administer a Household Hazardous Waste Discretionary Grant. BACKGROUND AB 1220 authorized the California Integrasted Waste Management Board to expend funds from the Integrated Waste Management Account, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the making of grants to cities, counties, or other local agencies with responsiblity for solid waste management, for local programs to help prevent the disposal of hazardous wastes at disposal sites, including, but not limited to, programs to expand or initially implement HHW programs. The Discretionary Grant is competitive with a maximum of $150,000 possible with no matching funds required. The Grant is awarded on a points basis, with points given for; ability to complete, cost effectiveness, clarity of proposal, establishing new centers, innovative approach, and joint or cooperative application with other agencies. The program we are proposing will focus on increasing the educationalXinformational programs related to Household Hazardous Waste. There will be development of bi- lingual outreach programs for the community and schools within Rancho Cucamonga. As part of the community outreach program the City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to develop a display and video that will be put on loan to various schools and for community events. This Grant will also further the efforts of current programs and address the requirements of Waste Management and Storm Water programs. ANAI.YSIS The Grant application is being submitted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will be coordinated and administered by the City Engineer. The Grant will be submitted for funds required for such items as staff time, educational material, and video display. The total Grant request is $35,000. An approved Resolution must be submitted with the application by September 30, 1994. City Engineer Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCRETIONARy GRANT WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted Assembly Bill 1220 (Eastin, 1993) that grants to local governments to establish and implement waste diversion and separation programs to prevent disposal of household hazardous waste, including household hazardous waste, in sol td waste 1 andfil 1 s; and WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board (Board) has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures governing application by cities and counties under the program; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Integrated Waste Management Board require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of application before submission of said application to the state; and WHEREAS, the appl icant will enter into an agreement with the State of California for the development of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES and authorizes the submittal of an application for the California Integrated Waste Management Board for a Household Hazardous Waste Discretionary Grant. The City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga all necessary applications, contracts, agreements, amendments hereto for the purpose of securing grant funds and to implement and carry out the purposes specified in the grant application. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager / Suzanne Ota, Community Services../M~a,'~.r/-' ? .,:/ ./~' ~. Karen Matcham, Recreation Supe~'/sor J' APPROVAL OF BANNER APPLICATIONS RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval 1994/1995. of the street banner applications for BACKGROUND Annually the Community Services Department requests applications for banner displays on Base Line Road and also on Archibald. The policy regulating the display of banners has been in effect four years, and no changes to the policy are being requested. It is recommended, however, that the banner for the Founder's Day Parade and Celebration be allowed an extra week from October 24 - 31, 1994. This is in an effort to increase marketing efforts for this event. ANALYSIS The following applications meet the requirements as established by the City Council: Grape Harvest Festival: September 26 - October 11, 1994 Location: Archibald Fire Prevention Week: September 29 - October 16, 1994 Location: Base Line Red Ribbon Week: October 24 - October 31, 1994 Location: Archibald & Base Line Founder's Day Parade: October 17 - October 24, 1994 October 31 - November 14, 1994 Location: Archibald & Base Line Art in the Park: April 24 - May 8, 1995 Location: Archibald & Base Line CITY COUNCIL MEETING APPROVAL OF BANNER APPLICATIONS September 21, 1994 Page 2 R.C. Business & Community Expo: May 8 - May 15, 1995 Location: Archibald & Base Line Movies in the Park: June 5 - June 20, 1995 Location: Archibald & Base Line July 4th Celebration: June 21 - July 5, 1995 Location: Archibald & Base Line Concerts in the Park: July 5 - July 19, 1995 Location: Archibald & Base Line Respectfully submitted, \ .,'. ~ {-'},2- ~ ~ S ~ . , Communit~ Services Manager uZ,an~~t~a '~ ~, SO/KM/kls 31 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager Kathy Sorensen, CLP, Recreation Superintendent APPROVAL OF CONTRACTED SERVICE FOR THE FOUNDER'S DAY PARADE BY WORLD WIDE SPECTACULARS, INC., d.b.a. PAGEANTRY PRODUCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,851.77 TO BE PAID FROM ACCOUNT #01-4532-3900 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the contract with World Wide Spectaculars, Inc., d.b.a. Pageantry Productions, to produce the Founder's Day Parade in the amount of $6,851.77. BACKGROUND For the past fourteen years the City has sponsored the Founder's Day Parade. For the last four years the City has contracted with Pageantry Productions to organize various parade functions. These functions include trophies, dignitary vehicles, printing and mailing and processing of applications, organizing the parade line-up, and writing the announcing script. ANALYSIS The task of taking nearly 2,000 people and putting them in an organized parade line-up, asking them to perform and entertain, and yet do so without gaps is the main challenge of organizing any parade. This challenge is magnified when children are asked to march along and keep in step with older youth and adults. Several new steps were taken last year to minimize problems and they were very effective. These changes included: CITY COUNCIL MEETING CONTRACTED SERVICE FOR FOUNDER,S DAY PARADE September 21, 1994 Page 2 l) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) The non-competitive community/youth group entries begin the Parade. The Parade started at 9:30 a.m. and involved those community groups, organizations and schools who wanted to march or have vehicles in the Parade but were not of a competitive nature requiring judging standards. These groups were not to be judged, but would receive a parade participation ribbon. This year the Parade will be advertised to start at 9:30 a.m. with all Councilmembers, the Mayor and other dignitaries at the front of the Parade, followed by the non-competitive participants, and then the judged participants. The Parade route ended on the east side of Archibald, thereby making the Parade two tenths of a mile shorter. Disbanding would occur from Archibald to Ramona. The entry deadline (October 21st) will be strictly enforced. Accepting applications after the deadline adds to the overcrowding of the Parade. Staff will monitor application entries with Pageantry and assist with contacting and reminding community groups of the entry application deadline. If a sponsor is found, a Performance Award ($200 cash prize) will be awarded to the entry which performs at the three announcing stages and really gets the crowd into the spirit of the Parade. This recommendation is intended to encourage the entertainment value of the Parade. Last year's winner, Norwalk High School, was very excited about adding this cash prize to their band boosters. All judges will be under contract with Pageantry, therefore allowing Pageantry to have total control of the judges. This worked very well and will continue under this new contract. Last year the parade awards were incorporated into the Founder's Day Celebration held at the Adult Sports Park. This will continue in 1994 with the Award Ceremony held at approximately 1:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING CONTRACTED SERVICE FOR FOUNDER'S DAY PARADE September 21, 1994 Page 3 FISCAL IMPACT Funding for the Parade Contract has been budgeted in the FY 1994-95 Annual Budget. The contract amount is the same as last year's with no cost increase by Pageantry Productions. SUMMARY Numerous meetings were held between Community Services staff and Pageantry representatives to fully critique and develop recommendations to eliminate past concerns and to improve and enhance the upcoming Founder's Day Parade and Celebration. Staff feels confident that by following our format for last year will result in a successful and enjoyable community parade and celebration. Funding for the Parade Contract has been budgeted in the FY 1994-95 Annual Budget. ReSpectfully submitted~ ~~~De ota c6mm~nity Services Manager SO/KAS/kls DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF A PORTION OF COYOTE CANYON SCHOOL SITE WITH LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA (FORMER RUTH MUSSER SCHOOL SITE) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of a Lease Agreement for use of Coyote Canyon School site with Lewis Homes of California for recreation programs. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS During the past two years, the Community Services Department has conducted recreation programs at the Ruth Musser School site based on a Joint Use Agreement with the Central School District. Construction of the Ruth Musser Middle School has been completed and the District has turned over the temporary portable buildings back to Lewis Homes. The Lease Agreement would allow the City to continue to utilize the Terra Vista Center for its Playschool and recreation programs at the Coyote Canyon School site. The Lease provides the City with a rent-free month-to-month tenancy of two (2) portable buildings. The City would be responsible for maintenance and repair of the premises and would provide a $2 million comprehensive liability insurance coverage. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for this program has been budgeted in Community Services Department's Recreation Fund (Fund 13). Respectfully submittedJ -,_ S~zanne Ota, Community Services Manager SO/kla Attachment 'HYDRANT+--o~ %, .\ DATE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO LEASE BETWEEN THE CFFY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VAI] .EY BASEBAr ~l. CLUB, INC. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendment No. 7 to lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. pertaining to the terms and conditions for the expansion/special events parking lot. BACKGROUND: In September 1992, the City entered into a Lease with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. to be a Tenant at the stadium facility located on the west side of Rochester and south of Foothill Boulevard. During the first season, the need for additional parking facilities was recognized due to the Tenant's expansion of seating capacity at the stadium. The Tenant has agreed to cooperate with the City in providing a permanent parking facility. In October 1993, Amendment No. 4 to the lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. was approved. The amendment outlined a financial participation for the City and the Tenant in the acquisition, design and construction of the expansion/special events parking lot. The City and the Tenant identified a site for an expansion parking lot and the City began design work and construction of the expansion/special events lot. The terms were the Agency/City would acquire and develop the parking lot. The Tenant would pay "improvement rent", over a twenty year period of time, for the on-site costs of the expansion/parking lot, not to exceed $1.5 million. ANALYSIS: The City and the Tenant have agreed to modify the terms and conditions of payment for the expansion/special events parking lot. The revised terms require the Tenant, beginning in October 1994, to pay a September 21, 1994 Staff Report - Amendment No. 7 page 2 $15,000 per month "improvement rent" for the remaining term of the lease. In addition, the Tenant will contribute 30% of the ticket price and concession revenues for the remaining years of the lease, excluding beer and wine, from a pre season "freeway series" game with another California League team and a California League sanctioned game (16 games total). The revenue from these two games will be in addition to revenue currently being received from the present lease terms. The Tenant has provided a cumulative guarantee of $20,000 annually from the two games. The terms of the revised proposal provide the City with a net present value consistent with what was achieved with the prior amendment. One advantage to the City is the financial participation by the Tenant is complete at the term of the lease and the balloon payment is eliminated. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO LEASE This Amendment No. 7 is entered into as of September __, 1994, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("City" hereinafter) and VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC., a California Corporation ("Tenant" hereinafter). EIIIiESSEIR A. Recitals. (i) City and Tenant entered into a Lease dated September 16, 1992 ("the Lease" hereinafter) regarding the use of a stadium and ancillary facilities ("the Stadium" hereinafter) described therein. (ii) The Lease has been amended six (6) times heretofore, the fourth such amendment having been concerned with the provision of additional parking facilities to serve Tenant's baseball patrons and to provide for Tenant paying additional rent to partially defray the costs of that parking ("the Fourth Amendment" hereinafter). (iii) The purpose of this Amendment No. 7 is to modify the Fourth Amendment with respect to the consideration to be paid by Tenant to City to aid City in defraying the costs of providing said additional parking. B. Amendment No. 7. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUAI-LY AGREED AS FOI-/-OWS: 1. The parties hereto acknowledge that City has acquired the property described in Exhibit "A" to the Fourth Amendment and has constructed a parking lot thereon and thus is providing the additional parking referred to in the Fourth Amendment. 2. Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Fourth Amendment hereby are rescinded and are superseded by the following provisions of this Amendment No. 7. 3. In consideration of the City providing the above referenced additional parking, and in addition to any other payments due from Tenant to City pursuant to the Lease, Tenant shall pay to City monthly Improvement Rent in the amount of $15,000.00, payable on the first day of each month during the remaining term of the Lease, commencing with the month of October 1994. All provisions of the Lease applicable to rent payments shall apply to Tenant's obligations to pay the Improvement Rent including, but not limited to, the second and third sentences of Section 4.05 and Sections 4.08 and 35.01 of the Lease, except that Section 4.07 of the Lease shall not apply to Tenant's obligation to pay Improvement Rent. 4. In further consideration of the City providing the above referenced additional parking, and in addition to any other payments due from Tenant to City pursuant to the Lease, Tenant shall pay to City thirty percent (30%) of all revenues derived by Tenant from ticket sales, (excluding admissions taxes paid by patrons) and concession sales (other than beer and wine) derived from the following two events to occur each year during the term of the Lease (for a total of 16 events): A. A pre-season exhibition baseball game between the Quakes and another California League team: and B. One California League sanctioned regular season, All Star or Playoff game between the Quakes and another California League team to be designated by the Quakes at least sixty (60) days prior to the designated game. City may develop a specific program for any such game with the reasonable support and assistance of Tenant. If any of the 16 games specified above in this Paragraph 4 is not played due to rain or any other unforeseen circumstance, Tenant and City shall agree on an alternate date for the conduct of that game. 2 Payments to be made by Tenant with respect to a game pursuant to B, above, shall be due within thirty (30) days following the conclusion of that game. Should the total of such payments for any calendar year be less than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00), Tenant's second payment for that year shall be increased so that the total of the two payments for that year shall be the sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00). All provisions of the Lease applicable to rent payments shall apply to Tenant's obligation to make payments pursuant to B above, including, but not limited to, the second and third sentences of Section 4.05 and Sections 4.06, 4.08 and 35.01 of the Lease, except that Section 4.07 of the Lease shall not apply to such payments. 5. The payments specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Amendment No. 7 shall not in any way affect the computation of additional rent pursuant to Section 4.03 of the Lease. Further, parking revenues derived from games specified in subparagraph 4B above, shall be distributed in accordance with Amendment No. 1 to the Lease. 6. Other than as amended hereby, the Lease as preveiously amended by Amendments 1 through 6, inclusive, and each and every term and provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect. WHEREFORE, City and Tenant have entered into this Amendment No. 7 as of the date set forth hereinabove. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: By: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor By: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk VALLF:-Y BASEBALL CLUB, INC. By: Henry E. Stickney, President 41 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN MICHAEL D. BROWN AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA!~ONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) RECOlilEI)ATION It is reconmnended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Michael D. Brown and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Michael D. Brown has agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to her property. In this regard, Michael D. Brown has executed an agreement with the City for installation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. Respectfully submitted, William J. O~ City Engineer WjO:HM:ly Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM MICHAEL O. BROWN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Brown parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Michael D. Brown has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN JORGE CONTRERAS OROZCO AND ROSA GARAY OROZCO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN SLEET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) RECI311ENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Jorge Contreras Orozco and Rosa Garay Orozco and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUN!)/ANALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Jorge Contreras Orozco and Rosa Garay Orozco have agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to her property. In this regard, Jorge Contreras Orozco and Rosa Garay Orozco have executed an agreement with the City for installation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. RespectfullZ William J. ' City Engineer WJO:HM:ly Attachment L Y RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM JORGE CONTRERAS OROZCO AND ROSA GARAY OROZCO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has establishe~ requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Orozco parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Jorge Contreras Orozco and Rosa Garay Orozco have agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayo~ and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN JERRY A TRONIER, LITA FAE TRONIER AND IRENE MC CARROL AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) RE)NI)ATION It is reconmnended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Jerry A. Tronier, Lira Fae Tronier and Irene McCarrol and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUIID/AIIALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Jerry A. Tronier, Lira Fae Tronier and Irene Mc Carrol have agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to her property. In this regard, Jerry A. Tronier, Lira Fae Tronier and Irene McCarrol have executed an agreement with the City for installation of improvements and dedication of the ri ght-of-way. Respectfull: William J. ' City Engineer WJO:HM:ly Attachment RESOLUTION NO. (~2- / (~ 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM JERRY A. TRONIER, LITA FAE TRONIER AND IRENE MC CARROL, AND AUTHORIZING THE IIAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Tronier and Mc Carrol parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Jerry A. Tronier, Lira Fae Tronier and Irene Mc Carrol has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT Will jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry Dyer, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-20, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND RED OAK STREET, SUBMITTED BY LEE AND STIRES, INCORPORATED P, EC()~I~NDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the Development Review 93-20 improvement agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City C1 erk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Development Review 93-20, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Red Oak Street, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 13, 1994, for the development of a 33,000 square foot office building on 3 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The Developer, Lee and Stires, Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $20,400.00 Labor and Material Bond: $10,200.00 Copies of the improvement agreement and security and the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the property owner(s) are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectful 1 y s_u_~bmi tted, Will iam J. O'~t~ City Engineer WJO:JAD:dlw Attachments Y San Antonia (~ W'n,,10N AV ~ Aita ~x IA4Z Lama ~- ~ ; , . VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA ~ D.R. 93 -Z O 5;EC ARRON ROUTE AND RED OAK STREET N.T.S. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVI~ q3-20 (APN 209-144-80) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of ~ncho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Lee and Stires, Incorporated, as developer, for the improvements of public ri ht-of- way, generally located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and ~d Oak Street in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific P1 an; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Conmnission, Development Review g3-~.O; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which ts identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as fol 1 ows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-20 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recital s are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 APN Z.~8~ A~. N.T.~. -. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ , .~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA DR ~a-Zo .'~i-/ STREET Dist. S1 S6 LIGHTS: 5800L 9500L 3' EXHIBIT WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: DR 93-20 NUMBER OF LAMPS 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L LANDSCAPING: Di st. Community Equest. Trail D.G.S.F. L3B Turf Non-Turf Trees S.F. S .F. Ea. 13 ASSESSMENT UNITS: Parcel Acres N/A 2.986 Assessment Units By District S1 S6 L3B 5.972 2.986 2.986 * Exi sting Form Date 2/18/93 52 ORDINANCE NOo 536 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. Recitals (i) On June 22, and continued to July 27, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Sign Ordinance Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 94-01, thereby recon~nending that the City Council adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 94-01. (ii) On September 7, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 14.20,100, Subsection 2. Business identification (businesses within shopping centers), is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A." SECTION 2: Section 14.16.022 is hereby added to Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: 14.16.022 Traffic hazards. All sigms and sign structures shall ha subject to the following: No sign or sign structure shall ha erected at the intersection of any street or at any driveway access to a street in a way that obstructs free and clear vision of pedestrians and vehicular traffic l No sign or sign structure shall ha erected at any location where, by reason of the position, shape, illumination, or color, it may intez~ere with, obstruct the view of, or ha confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or ~evice; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 September 7, 1994 Page 2 Me sign or sign structure shall ~e erected that make the use of the words "STOP," "LOOK," mDAMGER," or any other word, ~hrase, symbol, er character in such a manner as to interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic. SECTION 3: Section 14.16.023 is hereby added to Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: 14-16.023 Illuminated sign nuisances. Signs illuminated internally or externally shall ha located or shielded so as to prevent any glare from the ~,]h, tubes, or other illumination devices from falling upon adjacent property or street rights-of- way. SECTION 4: Section 14.16.020.M. is hereby added to Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: M. Obecene matter. SECTION 5: Section 14-04.010, Subsection A, of Chapter 14.04 is hereby amended to read as follows: 14-04.010 Declaration of need. A. The city recognizes the need for signs as a means to advertise and identify businesses within the community. The city finds that signing is an important design element of the physical environment. Provisions consistent with the goals and objectives of the community are necessary to ensure that the special character and image the community is striving for can be attained while serving business needs in the community. The city is striving to provide an economically stable and visually attractive community through high quality site planning, building designs, landscaping, and signing. As a planned architectural feature, a sign can be pleasing and can harmonize with the physical character of its environment. Proper controls can achieve this goal and will make the city a more attractive place to live, work, and shop. SECTION 6: as follows: Section 14.08.210 of Chapter 14.08 is hereby amended to read 14.08.210 Monument sign. "Monument sign" means a free-standing sign ~ Z~ ~M~M ~M~ ~ ~M M~X~M~/ incorporating the design and building materials accenting the architectural theme of the buildings on the same property. CITY COUNCEL ORDINANCE NO. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 September 7, 1994 Page 3 SECTION 7: Section 14.08 · 33 1 is hereby added to Chapter 14.08 to read as follows: 14.08.331 Sign structure. "Sign structure" seam a structure of any kind, incluat-g supports, uprights, base, guys, anchors, bracing, framework, and any decoration of the sign upoo which a sign is placed or erected. SECTION 8: Section 14.24.070 of Chapter 14.24 is hereby amended to read as follows: 14.24.070 Illumination and motion. Monument signs shall be nonmoving stationary structures ( in all components ) and illumination, if any, shall be maintained by artificial light which is stationary and constant in intensity and color at all times (nonflashing). Internal illumination is preferred; if external illumination is used, concealed or decorative fixtures shall be used, SECTION 9: as follows: Section 14.20,040 of Chapter 14.20 is hereby amended to read 14.20.040 Special event signs. Special event signs may be approved for a limited period of time in any zoning district as a means of publicizing special events such as ~M~ ~M~M~ carnivals, festivals, charitable events, and Christmas tree lots, ~M~ f~f~ ~M~ in coe~unction with a Temporary Use Permit. To apply for approval of special event business or property a~ner mxst mxkmit an application with the city plannf~ing division which describes the proposed sign by means of a sketch and the display dates for review and approval. TM~ ~X~Y ~XfI~Z~M~ ~f ~M~ ~M~ f~/ Such special event signs shall be limited to the following provisions: As No more than one special event sign shall be permitted per activity and shall be either a wall, window, or ground sign, and use of flags, banners, and pennants. Be All special event signs shall be a maximum of fifty square feet and shall be posted below the roof or shall be no higher than eight feet in the case of a ground sign. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 September 7, 1994 Page 4 Special event signs shali. be limited to forty- five days per calendar year. SECTION 10: Section 14-20,041 of Chapter 14.20 is hereby amended to read as follows: 14.20,041 Ff~X~M~X ~X~ Temporary advertising silms. A ~X~M~X ~Z~ temporary advertising sign may be approved for a temporary period of time, as specified in this section, for commercial and industrial uses. The signs may be used to promote the sale of new products, mew tenant, new management, new hours of operation, a new service, or to promote a special sale. Any business or property c~ner desiring to us,] a ~f~X~M~Z ~Z~ te~ar~ advertising sign must file an application and drawing or photograph wi'~h the city planning division for review and approval· The use of such signs is subject to the following limitations: No more than one sign shall be permitted per activity or business. The sign shall be a temporary sign designed either as a wall sign, window sign, or ground sign. The sign can be in the form of a banner or pennant. The sign shall not exceed fifty square feet and shall be posted below the roof. In the case of a ground sign, the height of the sign shall not exceed eight feet. ~/ The s~n shall be liaited tea display period of at least seven days. l~4-e such periods shall be permitted for each calendar year, not to exceed a total of 63 days per year. A -,,4 of fo,a.r periods my be approved consecutively to allo~ a single sign t6 be displayed for up to 28 days; otherwise, a minimum of two weeks shall be required between display periods. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 September 7, 1994 Page 5 SECTION 11: as follows: Section 14.20.045 is hereby added to Chapter 14.20 to read 14.20,045 Grand o~ening signs. A grand opening sign may be a~proved for a temporary period of time in any ze~ing ~istric~ t~ advertise a new business or a change of business name following a closure. Any business or property owner desiring to use a grand opening sign mint file an application together with a drawing or photograph to the cityus planning division for review and approval. An application must be made either prior to opening or within the first 60 days of operation. The use of such signs is subject to the following liaitatious: No mere than me eiga shall be permitted per grand o~ening. The eign shall be a temporary sign designed either as a wall, window, or ground sign. The sign can be is the form of a banner or pennant. The sign shall not exceed 50 square feet and shall be posted below the roof. In the case of a ground sign, the beight of the sign shall not exceed 8 feet. The sign shall be limited to a display period not to exceed 30 days prior to opening and 60 days after ol~-n~g, for a total display period of 90 days- SECTION 12: This Council finds and determines that the project identified above in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 13: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 57 14.20.100 Permitted Signs -- Cam marchal and Office Zones- The foll~vLnq sign8 may be permitted in the cam martial and office z.nes skih~ ~,, IhP i}r,,~s,,ns CLASS ~GN MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM REMARKS TYPE NUMBER ~GN AR~A H~IGH~ e R.mnem Mall One per buUaLnq 10 · of the buUdlng Not to project above identtfication face, a madmum of face, not to exceed the roof and in no (L~ielne-- not within three per belles 150 quaff feet came be higher than sh.ppin9 centers 20 feet f~o m including ~nclie ~hed grade tenant office ~ bull4~ngm) urneat One per meet 24 equate feet Up to efeet ITsstags, a maximum of 2 per B,idnm Mall One per buJlalag I01 of the 1~9 Not to project above Identification face, a madmum of face, not to exceed the roof and In no (b,l/nemea within ) for any eel 150 quaff feet cm be higher than ahappIn9 centers) bum~m 20 feet t~om finished grade. Co A combination of mnnument and wall gJ~n8 may be useall however, c~nly 4 maximum of three Idana may be used idenLL~y any one beelineal- Mall Mane and monument mlcjna shall he mrchJtertually deWllgnad to be compatible vlth the development- Monument Ilgnl IhaH be placed entirely on the subject property end shall ovethancj Into private or pubnc property. A combination of monument and walt signs may be teeall heyever, only mattmum of 3 signs may be used Identify any one beainee~ Wall dgnm are U sited to bue4neae ident&ficatton only. A center i, one In vhich beminemee and mcturel are demlclned In an Intecpete,t and Interrelated development* Such asSIgn tl Independent of the number .t mtructure~, lot. E, or parcebl makinq up the center- AH shoppIn9 centers shall deveh,p a coordinated 11911 program for all tenant- and umen. Tide Includes raze, c,,Int. '~..' type, and beation. I.tm|ted vartath-, permitted, such rema~nblg compensate of the pr,~am remain the mama. 14.20.100 Permitted Sicl~l -- Corn merc~aI end OrEice Zone~, MAXIMUM J MAXIMUM I MAXIMUM NUMBER SiGN AREA HEIGHT The folk}wing alcjne may be permitted Ln the corn mercial and office z~,nes 8.hpzcl I,~ the i,t,,vls, un~ li51e,l: XEMARK~ per meet 24 quire feet Up to 8 feet 'T"wo Ipu r~ree f tmm;mw,m ~ I Monument Ilqnl Bay contlb~ up tn three idenUIqceUonm per ddet either the theme name d Lhe center and two tenante ,~ three tenanti. The delltin (cc}h~r. material, Style) of ell monument ,aclne mhmn be contolerant end coBpet_Lble to the dmmlgn c~ the center. Monument dgne Eacing dLfl'erent mereeta need not c,nteJn identical in~o~meUcaw. A4dll:lonelly, · tvn did dgn Ned not contain the Ill me copy. A. ~ i~k mi.im~m [~,r i~ vecemme~Jed- N,uume :r DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke the Cbnditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Con~nercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from May 4, 1994.) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke the Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Con~nercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60- (Continued from May 4, 1994.) RMCOE~D/L~ION Staff recommends that the City Council resume its review of Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and Entertainment Permit 91-02 and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolutions for your next meeting. BACm3~O~MD On June 1, 1994, the City Council re-opened the continued revocation hearing because the applicant had failed to comply with the conditions of approval. After taking in public testimony, the Council determined that the applicant had substantially achieved full compliance, except for providing outside security personnel. The City Council directed staff to work with the applicant as to the starting time for the outside security personnel and allowed him to continue to operate his business until the expiration of his lease. Based on City Council direction, staff worked with the applicant who agreed to the following: a security guard shall be on duty outside the facility in the parking lot and conduct periodic monitoring of the parking lot, as well as adjacent areas, to assist in averting nuisances and disturbances from the patrons between the hours of 8 p.m. and midnight on Thursday through Saturday, and between the hours of 9 p.m. and midnight on Sunday through Wednesday. The security guard need not be in a peace officer uniform, but he should be identified as a Sam's Place staff member. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 78-03 & EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE September 21, 1994 Page 2 ANALYSIS On June 15, 1994, the applicant informed staff of his intention to close the bar and entertainment portions of his business and allow his son to take over the restaurant business with the serving of beer and wine as well as having ten amusement devices. Attached is a copy of the letter from Mr. John Mannerino explaining the applicant's proposal in detail. Restaurants with the incidental serving of beer and wine are permitted in the Neighborhood Con~nercial District, subject to approval of an appropriate liquor license from the Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) Department. The applicant has already been issued a Conditional Use Permit for six amusement devices. To increase the number of amusement devices, the applicant needs to modify the Conditional Use Permit. Between the period of June and September of 1994, no complaints from the adjacent residents were received. The Police have stated that they have not received calls for service at the site or observed any non-compliance with the closing hour of midnight. According to Shirley Prasser, agent for the property owner, the lease for Sam's Place has not been renewed and will expire on September 17, 1994. However, she also indicated that they will likely allow Sam's Place to continue business on a month to month basis so long as rent is paid. When this matter was last heard by the City Council on June 1, the Council, by minute action, directed staff to work with the applicant on the hours of operation and use of security personnel. If the City Council concurs with the action taken by staff, modification to the existing Conditional Use Permit would be appropriate. Those modifications would state that the closing time for Sam's Place shall be changed from 2 a.m. to midnight (daily) and that the time for the security personnel to be stationed outside in the parking lot area shall be changed from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NF:Sp Attachments: Exhibit "1" - Letter from the Applicant dated June 20, 1994 Exhibit "2" - June 1, 1994 City Council Minutes and June 1 and May 4, 1994 City Council Staff Reports Exhibit "3" - City Council Resolution Nos. 94-004, 91-381, and 91-382 Exhibit "4" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-98 61 MANNERINO BRIGUGLIO L ,~ W ~ 0 F F I C E S ,CHN O M~,NNER~NO S2, L BR~GUGLiO f',,1]TCHELL RGTH June 20, 1994 Mr. Brad Buller Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ,~ANCHO CUCAMONb, ,-ANNJNG DIVISION e JUN 2 3 1994 Re: Sam's Place Dear Mr. Bullet: This correspondence shall confirm a conversation which we had in your office on June 15, 1994, in whichMr. Pellegrino indicated his intentions with regard to the premises currently known as Sam's Place. F!. Pellegrino communicated to you the following: 1. That it was his intention to, as soon as possible, close the business currently known as Sam's Place and remove the Type 47 Liquor License from those premises; 2. Im is the intention of his son, Anthony Pellegrino, to establish a new business in that locale not dissimilar to that business known as "Buffalo Inn" in Upland wherein a menu of burgets, fries, other grill items, some pasta and light dishes, be served. Those premises would be licensed by a beer and wine license, only to be established in the name of Anthony Pellegrino and his father, Sam Pellegrino. It was explained that it was necessary to have Sam Pellegrino be a license holder on the premises in order to establish credit with the alcohol vending concerns :ha~ would smock ~he beer and wine. 3. It was represented that no permit for live entertainment would be sought on those premises to alleviate any concern with regard to noise and disruption of the neighborhood. There would be app!ica:ions for approximately ten arcade devices comprising two / coin operated pool tables, approximately fnur coin operated dar____~ m~chines, one Dinball machine, one trivial video machine, and a coin operated cigarette rending machine and a juke box which are contemplated to be placed at the rear of the premises. We believe that this permit would cause only minimal noise and no disruption to :he community and neighborhood. Anthony Pel!egrino intends to structure the usage as a restaurant, gathering place, and social environment, not as a nigh~ club, dance place or where music or live enzerzainment is the primary draw and attraction. C~P 7~-c 5 _:j33 5.:?E_ :,E ~'2;D SU'~E '~'~ R~NC,~O C_C:MONG~ ,C: 91730 TEL ~9'29,9S0-!1,20 FAX I9091941-8610 - - 62 Mr. Brad Buller June 20, 1994 Page Two 4. We also discussed the problem with regard ~o the chain blocking the parking places and back driveway from the north side of the buildings. As we indicated ~o you, this chain has been stolen on a number of occasions and is far too expensive to engage in continued replacement. You indicat'ed to us that so long as no compla~nzs 9rose, and further so long as no parking appeared to be occurr!ng in those areas, that it would not be necessary to continue to engage in the futile and expensive replacement of that chain. We will soon be making application for an arcade permit for the purpose of operating the arcade devices as above described. Mr. Anthony Pellegrino will be the prime petitioner and he will be the owner and manager of that establishment. Because of the Alcohol Beverage Commission Regulations, in is necessary for Mr. Sam Pe!legrino's name ~o appear on the arcade permit since his name will also appear on the alcohol vending license for crediu purposes. You have our assurances however that Anthony Pellegrino will be the owner and operator of that business. M~. Sam Pe!legrino is immediately seeking a viable alternative for the placemetE of his Type 47 Liquor License for the estab!ishmenm commonly known as Sam's Place. In the event that no location is found prior to the granting of an arcade permit, he will place in limbo that license until such time as one can be determined. Thank 'rcu for the courtesy of the meeting and the time expended _n. ruly yours, t / MAN~. ,R,,~NO & BRiGU ,.,~O '~ BY: ' / '/~ ' '~' " 2) JDN.: kaw / a' ' ' ion ~ n T ' City Council ,'vti. nu~s June 1, 19oA Page 7 F2. CONSfI:)FRATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION ~ l FVY OF Tiql= ANNUAl. ASSI:SSMrFNTS WITHIN l ANDSCAP~. MAINT!:NANCI~. DISTRIC'~ ~ 1.2. 3A. ]B. 4.5. 6. 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAl- YEAR 1994/95 (No lncre,se of AsSeSSmen, filet Proposed) See Item F1 for discussion. R3ESOLUTION NO. 9a- 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI-~ ,~iTY OF RANCI-IO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. TO LEVY AND CO' ~.ECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT .' dS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO TIlE LANDSCAPE AND S~ ,EET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Willjams to a, duve Resolution No. 94-109. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). F3. CONSIf~FRATION TO APPROV~ TN"- ANNUAl. FNGINI~R'S RFPORT ANn RF~OI-UTION FOR ~ t !:VY OF Tl, f~ ANNUAl. ASSI~SSIV~'.~ WITNIN ~ PARK AN~ RPt'RI:ATIflN IlvfPRflV~IVfi=NT DISTRICT titan-851 FOR FISCAl- YF :. ,.J.o94/95 UMo lnerea.w of As~mmemt Rata is Propoimi) See lt~rn FI fig discussion. __ - RESOLUTION NO. 94-1 I0 A '~}LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlt CITY OF RANCHO AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS THIN TIlE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMiNT DISTRICql NO. 85-PD (HERITAGE AND RID HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) '~mmid~',seconded by Willisms to aplmmve Resolution No. 94-110. Motion carried F4. CONSITmFRATIflN OF t'Y'Rw/BITIONAI. USIE PFRMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PF AC~- - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit fig the opentim of a bar in conjunction with a nstaurant in the Neighlxxhtxxl Cammercial Distact, Iocau~d at the nigthwest comer of lgmls and Carnelian Su?.ets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. Sinport pmsenr, d by Nancy Fonl, Seniig Planner. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet opened the meeting fig public hearing. AddressmE the City Council were: John Mannedno, 9333 Base Line Reed, mpresenmmI Mr. Pe!legrino, paumd out a telurn' from the property manager m the Council m show th~ compliance with the conditions has not been u emy as might have been expected. He smed he did not undentand why they we~ back befo~ tim Cotmcil because Mr. PelleFino has been n'yinl to comply with the restrictions ptaced by the CotmciL He rated he was not awaf~ of any complaints that have come in. He agreed that they were unable to comply in one week but explained the difiqcultiu encountered in trying to coorciinate with all the different agencies involved. I-{e also stattxl then was a quesUon as to the rcquuzment for security. and felt the way it was wriugn was fffZ 6-/f ".2-." City Council .V~inutes .rune 1, 1994 Page 8 ambiguous and that they were in compliance with that requU'ement as they had interpremd iL He showed photographs that. supported theU' compliance. He also felt that employees and patrons of other establishments in the shopping center were mating some of the problems attributed to Sam's Place, and that they had no control over them. He felt if staff were to go out and continuously monitor this establishment they could find violations that he felt were punirlve in nature, but he did not feel thai was the point of the conditions when they were placed upon ~e bar. He thought if Mr. Penegrino evidenced a good faith eftror~ to reduce the impact of his establishment on the neighborhood he couJd stay open until midnight and that was what was occurnng. Sam Pellegrino, Sam's Place, felt the Council has placed more emphasis on his establishment than on others in the City and that the City did not go after other ban that are in the same situation. He stated he has lost 43~ of his business in the last four weeks due to the conditions placed upon him. He also felt the amcle in the Z:)a~ly Badlet~a had an adverse impact on his ability to f'md another location to open his bar at. Mayor Pro Tern Buquet asked if he was closing his establishment at midnight, Sam PelJegrino, Sam's Place, stated yes. The only people in the bar after midnight were staff people and customers who might he fimshing the~ last drinks. Eric Snedaker, 7534 Plymouth Way, believed the Council has taken an aggteuive stance on undesirable establishments, and was not going to argue about that position, but asked them to fully consider Sam's situation and that they take into account the opinions of the residents as a whole and not just a few concerned parties. He thought that most residents in this area wiU be drowned out by the sound of freeway traffic in a few years, more than from his bar. There being no further response, the pobUc hearing was closed, Councilmember Alexander felt they might have overreacted. He did not know why they were not looking at the intent instead of the letter of the law. He stated he was not aware of any complaints, and felt if the officers occasionally check to see that he is still tr,/ing to comply to the conditions set by the Council, be felt that was adequate. He added the establishment has agreed to close or relocate by Sepmmbet and was not in support of the resolution, Councilmember Willlares concurred wid~ Councilmember Alexander. She asked if the chain appeared to be · problem with the property manager and owner, was there another way they could resolve that issue, Brad Buller, City Planner, staled the chain along the wall was not required, and was · misinteqxetation by the applicant and could be removed. FIe staled if the Council wanted to remove the other chain and leave the "No Parking" signs posled, they could go with that. He stated in ~ to Ibe ¢oadjljoa for a security guard at 6.'00 pro., the Council could set whataver requirements they deemed approprme and sttq would follow their guidelines. Councdrnember Gum asked if they needed Io have security that early. James Markman, City Amy, stated the reason for a security guard provision is because it is objective, because other requiremenu, such as the owner will not allow any disturbance, is very subjective and these amorphous conditions are very dift"N:ult to monitor for compliance. He stated it was probably for that reason they set · speci.r~c Ume for security. He stated he would not suggest they go back to some amorphous condition, but it was the CouncLrs decision. City Council Minu~s June l, 1994 Page 9 Councilmember Alexander stared they might want to consider changing the tune so security requirements would s~ at sundown. Councilmember Guticrrez wanted to be sure they were being consistent and did not feel they were doing thaL He appreciated staffs diligence on the matter but might feel differendy if there had been complaints from the neighborhood, He felt they could conUnue until September, and that providing security once it was dark would be all right with him, Mayor Pro Tem Buquet felt the owner might have drawn this attention upon himself, but agreed that seven days might not have been enough time for full compliance. lie staled he had heard there was some after bout activity, but he would take the word of the applicant that it was not occumng. lie stated he appreciated staff monitoring the situation, and did not feel they were at fault for bringing this back to the Council because they had been directed ~o do so if Mr. Pellegrino was no~ in full compUance, though after seeing the photoraphs it appean M~. Pellegrirto is 99% in compliance. He stated they could look at a compromise on the time for secutity to s~attN maybe around 7:t30 or 7:30 p.m. John Mannerino felt they should tailor the condition for security to the use of the bet. He staled they really have no business until around 9:00 p.m., and tha~ on Monday and Tuesday there is almost no busineas al all. He stated t~e busiest times are Thunday tarough Saturday after 9:.00 p.m. Mayor Pro Tern asked Brad Bullet to work with Mr. Mannerino in {terming wtm w~s required for security thai would be objectivr~ Brad BuUet, City Planner, felt they could do thaL RESOLLrfiON NO. 94-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNI& REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMTT NO. 78- 03 FOR THE OPERATION OF A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN TH~ NEIGFEBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-81 1-M TI~OUGH CONSIDFRATION OF I:NTI:RTAINMI:NT PI:RMrr 91-02 - SAM'S PI.Af'!~.. A request to revoke Entertainment Permit foe a bit and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial Dismet, Iocaled at the northwesl comet of lgm md~ian Siteels - APN: 201-811-56 Ihtoulh60. RESOLUTION NO. 94-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T}ffi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(3A, CALIFORNIK REVOKING ENTERTAINMENT PEltMIT I~K). 91432 FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREETS IN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPFORT THI~REOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH ACtiON: Council directed staff to work wil~ t~e applicant to smooth out any final requi~ments and allow them to operate unUl the expitaUon of the lease. City Councti Minutes ',~y 4. 1994 Page 8 ACTION: Item FI was removed from t~e agenda in order for the appropriate legal advertising requirements m be met. F2. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAt. USF PFRMIT 78-03 - SAM' S PT.AC~ - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest comer of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through riO. Staff report preented by Nancy Fong, St. Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were:. $ohn Mannedno, repnse, nting the appellant. stated beere,e- of ' pendin litigation, did not speak at the Pla^ning Commission meeting. =: g that he and Mr. Pellegnno ML Pe!legrino disrabuted a letter to the City Council. Mr. Mannerino stated Mr. Pellegrino is looking for a new location for his business that will be bettff for the type of business he has. tie asked that the revocation be postponed until af~a' Septtuber 17 when Mr. Pe!legrmo's lease would be up at his present location which would allow Mr. Mlegrino to operag his bar unchu' strict enforcement Soe Fabis, 6611 Topaz, felt the City should prot_,~zt_. the midents and that Sam's Place should hav~ go comply with all r~gulationt He statext be supports the Planning Commission's decision. Councilmember Willlares asked him what be sees as the problem with Sam's Place, Mr. Fabis stated he felt it is the type of activity that goes on at night, i.e., with the noise and all. He felt the business was a nuisance. Councilmember Willlares asked if it was this bad four years ago when the business Mr. FabiS stated with the expansion of the use permits, it got worse. Theaz being no further responst the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Alexander stated he ~ects Mr. Fabis' opinions, but wondered if it was prudent to continue the m:,~_er to September. He stated he wa~ also concerned about the people that at~ employed at Sam's Place !uein$ theLr jobs. He sated he felt the Planning Commissiora's r~ort should he '-ceFed. but m let the business stay open unui September 17. Councilmember Buquet ~ he aplxeciatu Mr. Pellegrino's position, but was also ~ of this whok issu~ lle felt if the Council considen ex~ding this until Sepu~mber, that the houn of operation should be !imit~d. He felt this would be a good faith measu~ on all parties. Councilmember Gutierrez felt then we~ a lot of good quaJi~ies m Sam and stall he was impressed with the letua, that Mr. Pe!legrino wrote. He felt Sam was nally sorry and that the Council should forgive him and let him conUnue with his businesa unUl September. He staled be could abo sympathi~ with the nci~hbon. City Council M~nutt~s May 4, 1994 Page 9 Councilmember Willjams stated she would go along with closing the business at midnight and to let him continue until September. but that she would like a guarantee that they will be moving in September and not come back at that time asking for this to be conUnued for another yea~ or so. She also inquired about the parking lot ,,__,?~laat at the tear of the building and felt all conditions imposed on this business should be enfon:ed. Mayor Stout stated he has never voted for this business to be in its present location and does not feel Sam's Place belongs there. He felt .'vtr. Pellegrino has repeatedly not met aH the conditions and did not think it should be Councilmember Alexander felt the transition should also be considered and that if Mr. Pellegrino does not comply, that could result in immediate closure. RESOLUTION NO. 94-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING TF[E APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION IN REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-03 FOR THE OPERATION OF A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKXNG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TtiER~OF - AlaN: 201-811-56 THROUGH ~0 CC~NSTnI:RATtCIN OF FNTI:RTAINMI:NT P~:RMIT 91-02 - SAM'S pt At'~- - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke an Entertainment Permit foe a bat and te~amant in the Neigh~ Commercial Disu'ict, locaed at the northwen cornet of 19th and Carnelian Snets - APN: 201-811-:545 u'a~xagh 60. RESOLUTION NO. 94-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TRE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING TI~ PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION IN REVOK3NO ENTERTAINMENT PERMTF NO. 91-02 FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT ~ NORTHVv'F..ST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN ~ IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMF..RCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPFORT TItF=RF=OF - APN: 201-811-56 TI-I~OUGH 60 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, ~ by Gutien, ez to continue the matlet until September 21, 1994. Motion carried 3-2 (Stout and Buquet voed no). Councilmember Wigiams asked if this motion included the closing of the business at 12.t30 midnight Stout staed it did not include thai. She U~en asked for a reconsideratiou of the motion. T~ Counc~ asked to clarify the motion in on:let to m-voe so that the metjan includes ee bnsiness closing s 1~30 midnight. Brad Bullet, City Planner, staled they are not in compliance with cur~nt coQditians, i.e. the posting of sip. s, the tandscaped bamer~ate foe themat parking lot, and asked ilrthat shouid go with eme motice. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. Staff recommends that the City Council re-open the continued revocation hearing for the above-described permits. If after the public hearing it is determined that the applicant has not complied with all the conditions of approval, staff recommends approval of the attached resolutions revoking Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and Entertainment Permit 91-02. The continued revocation hearing is recommended to be re-opened for further Council consideration for the above-described permits as a result of the applicant's failure to comply with the conditions of approval within one week from the meeting on May 4, 1994. The May 4, 1994, revocation hearing was continued to September 21, 1994, with the condition that the applicant comply with all conditions of approval within one week from the May 4, 1994, date and that he close his business at midnight instead of 2 a.m. Based on the inspections of May 12, 18, and 24, 1994, staff observed that the applicant has complied with some but not all of the on-site physical improvements. At the writing of this report, the no parking signs along the wall of the west property boundary have not been installed and the chain gate along the north driveway has been found open in the evening hours. The chain gate was to be closed in the evenings to prohibit vehicles from parking adjacent to the residential homes to the east. An inspection at 9:45 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 1994, found the chain gate open and a van parked in the westerly parking lot. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 78-03 & EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE June 1 , 1994 Page 2 Field observation by the Police Department h. as found the doors to Sam's Place to be closed at midnight since the Council's May 4 hearing, however, a patron of Sam's did call and share that drinks are still being served after midnight and that a D.J. was performing. Staff is attempting to verify this information. Staff has not observed illegal entertainment since the hearing on May 4, 1994. Respectfully submitted, BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter to Applicant dated May 17, 1994 Exhibit "B" - City Council Resolution Nos. 94-004, 91-381, and 91-382 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-98 Resolution Revoking CUP 78-03 Resolution Revoking EP 91-02 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 4, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Con~nission's decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Co~[nercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Comission's decision to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. I~ECO[~DATION Staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision in revoking Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and Entertainment Permit 91-02. Two separate Resolutions of Denial are attached for the Council's action. On March 23, 1994, the Planning Conmlission conducted a revocation hearing on the two permits. At that meeting, the applicant requested a continuance because of his pending criminal case. At the advice of the City Attorney, the Commission proceeded with the hearing, whereby the applicant chose not to participate in the revocation hearing. After taking in public input, the Commission determined that the business is not operated in a manner consistent with the conditions of approval or the permitted activity and revoked both permits by unanimous vote- The applicant made a timely appeal of the Commission's decision. In considering the revocation of the two permits, the Con~nission found that the applicant has the responsibility to abide by the terms of Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and Entertainment Permit 91-02. The Con~nission felt that the City has gone to its limits to cooperate with the applicant and to mitigate j 71 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 78-03 & EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE May 4, 1994 Page 2 the public nuisance problems. The Commission found that there is sufficient evidence in the report to indicate that the applicant failed to comply with several conditions of approval. Specifically, he failed to install permanent no parking signs and physical barriers at the northwest parking area to prohibit patrons from parking in the area closest to the ad]acent residences. He also continued to conduct entertainment outside the approved list of permitted entertainment uses, such as having a disc jockey. The Commission also reviewed two written responses (Exhibit "D") from adjacent residences who had objected to the public nuisance created by Sam's Place and stated they were in favor of revoking the two permits. Two residents spoke at the meeting and stated they were in favor of revoking the two permits because of the incompatibility of the bar and entertainment uses with the adjacent residences. Based on public input and the evidence presented in the staff report, the Commission revoked the permits and set a ten-day period for Sam's Place to cease having entertainment and serving alcc~ol. To date, the applicant has not complied with the above-mentioned conditions of approval nor ceased having entertainment or serving alcohol. Copies of the March 23, 1994, Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report are attached for Council's review. Also outlined in Exhibit "F" is a detailed history and chronology of the Conditional Use Permit. FACTS FOR FINDINGS Ae Conditional Use Permit 78-03. In reviewing this appeal, the Council, after investigating the evidence and upon conclusion of the hearing, must decide on one of the following options: Find that the CUP is being conducted in an appropriate manner and that no action to modify or revoke is necessary; or e Find that the CUP in not being conducted in an appropriate manner and that modifications to the conditions are necessary; or Find that the CUP is not being conducted in an appropriate manner and that modifications are not available to mitigate the impacts and, therefore, revoke the permit. Staff reco~nends that the Council find the Conditional Use Permit is not being conducted in an appropriate manner and uphold the Planning Conmlission's decision to revoke the permit. If the Council concurs, and following the final action, staff will inform Alcohol Beverage Control of the revoked permit for the bar. Sam's Place could continue to operate as a restaurant with the incidental serving of beer and wine which is permitted by right. B. Entertainment Permit 91-02. determine if the applicant: In reviewing the appeal, the Council must CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 78-03 & EP 91-02 - SAM'8 PLACE May 4, 1994 Page 3 Made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statements in their application; or Violated any provision of Entertainment Ordinance No. 290 or any other regulation or condition relating to the permitted activity; or 3. Is convicted of a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude; or Violated any regulations or conditions adopted by the Planning Con~nission or City Council relating to the permittee's business or permit; or Conducted business in a manner contrary to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the public; or Demonstrated that he is unfit to be trusted with the privileges of such permit. Staff recommends that the Council find the applicant to be in violation of the Entertainment Ordinance by offering entertainment beyond what is specifically permitted and the conditions of approval adopted by City Council Resolution Nos. 94-004 and 91-381, and Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-98, and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to revoke the permit. The result of this action would be that the applicant could continue to operate the restaurant with the incidental serving of beer and wine, but without the entertainment. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Appeal Letter Exhibit "B" - March 23, 1994, Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolutions No. 94-21 and 94-22 Exhibit "D" - Letters From Adjacent Residents Exhibit "E" - History and Chronology of CUP 78-03 Resolution Denying the Appeal of CUP 78-03's Revocation Resolution Denying the Appeal of EP 91-02's Revocation RESOLUTIC~ NO. 94-004 A RESOLUIICN OF THE CITY CO[A~IL OF IME CITY OF RANCID ~, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING ~{E PLANNING CCMMI~I~'S DBEISlON IN PART IN D~Df/NG A MDOIFICATION TO ~ PEF~[IT NO. 91-02, TO EXPAND I~E ~ TO ~Ta'r'X4 A LIVE BAND AND DISC JOCXEY, AND ~ON WITM A Pab~iRLRa~T AND BAR ~ AT 6620 CARN~xAN STREET IN THE NEI~ C~M~CIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKinG FINDINC~ IN SUPPORT ~F - APN: 201-811-56 ~ 60. (i) Luanne Peller3rino has filed an applicaticm f~r the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. 91-02, as described in the title of this (ii) On ~ 10, 1993, the Plann/rr/~i-~sic~ of the City of ~ Cucamor~a ~ a duly noticed public hearir~ c~ the applicaticel and concluded said hearing cel that date. ~he O,,-,,i-~ic~ adoptad a Resolution1 of Denial at the meetir~ cel November 23, 1993. (iii) The decisic~ re~resented by said Plannir~ O-,,,,i~ic~ resolutic~ was timely appealed to this Council. (iv) On Jar~aary 5, 1994, the City Council of the City of ~ O~-amonga ccrrhrt~ a duly noticed public hearirr/c~ the applicatic~ ar~ concluded said hearir~ c~ that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prier to the ad~fcic~ of this Resolutic~ have occurred. B. Resol~im. N(~, IM~EFC$~E, the City Council of the CitTofRanchoO~,,..~does hereby find, determine, ar~resolveas follo~B: 1. ~uLs Council hereby s~ecifically firds that all of the facts set forth in the ~ecitals, Part A, of t, hi- Resoluticm are true and 2. Based u~m eakstantial evidere presented to this Council durir~ the ak~cve-~e~e,aed ~ublic hearir~, includin~ written staff re~rts, the minutes of the Plannir~ O'-,,,,i~sic~ meeting, ar~ the contents of Plannin~ C~i~icel Resolution1 No. 93-101, this Council her~ s~ecifically finds as follows: a. The aRolicatic~ aRolies to ~..,,.,t-ex. Ly' located at 6620 Carnelian Street ar~ is preserm].y iz~ with a sho~ center; and Pasoiution No. 94-004 Fage 2 b. The prcper~ to the north is vacant and planned for a future freeway, the pro~ to the south is a shopping center, the property to the east is a shcpp~ center; and the properties to the west are single family residences; and c. The original Entertainment Permit was granted for a duet and allowed entertainment on Monday through Saturday, between 8 p.m. to 2 a.m.; d. The applicant expanded the types of entertainment to include live bards, disc jockey with karaoke, and lingerie show~ and the days for entertainment to include Sunday, in violation of Ordinance No. 290 and City Oouncil Resolution No. 91-382; and e. After re~ea~a contacts with City staff re~ the violations, the applicant continued the viol.ations, which ultimately led to the issuance of the City's Notice of Violation. Upon receivir~ the Notice of Violation, the applicant suknitted an application requesting modification to the Entertainment Permit to allow entertainment on Sunday and to add live hands, disc jockey, ard karaoke for entertainment; and f. The City received u~me~ f~ adjacent resia~ts objectir~ to the loud ~sic free the enterta~ in the bar and loud noise frce the loiterin~ activities in the parkin~ lot in the late evenin~ and early ~r~ hours, during the months the applicant illegally ~ the er~ertaj=~ent; g. The ~u~c~ entertainment with the ~ion of karaoke will ccr~inue the land use conflict previously described with the westerly reeidential neighborhood because of the adverse im~aot of ex=essive noise c~dax/free Sam's Place in the late emnin~ and early mornin~ hcurs; and h. The applicant has not c~m~t~ated that he can be a good neighbor nor cceply with the City's codes and conditions of a~orov~l because the City has previously received cceplaints from residents of the ~ westerly neighborhood objectir~ to the loud n~sic, noise, and loiterir~ activities cr~r~ from Sam's Place and because the applicant curiahind to violate the City's ~dinarcse ar~ ccrr~ticr~ of a~Eoval urr~r the permit despite repeated notiotas from the City to cease the violarioTs and to address facts set forth in pm~&~ur. I a~ 2 akx~%, this Council hereby finds and ccncl,~ as follows: a. That the ocTfEEt of the eS~-~hl~ and ~ cJr=antix,:/of the application w~u/d be cc~ to the public health, safety, ~ls, or b. Ihat the establishment is likaly to be operated in an illegal, im~rq3er, ~r ai~r-~erly manner. c. ~hat that granting of the application wuuld create a public d. That the normal o~eration of the prenises w~uld interfere with the normal peace and quiet of any surl~ residential heir. 4. Based upon the fira~ngs and cc~clusiure set fcrth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the a~licaticn in part subject to the followirg ccrrliticr~: a. All currfiticre of approval as cuntairmd in City Cuuncil Reeolutrm No. 91-382 ~ Plannin~ O~m~qi~l ]%eeoluticn No. 82- 98, a copy of which b~-~ been attached hereto, shall apply. b. Karacke without Disc Jockey is allowed. 5. Ibis (buncil hereby provides notice to John Mannerino that the time within which judicial review of the decisim Reeolutic[1 ~,-~t be sought is governed by the provisicre of California COde of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clrek of the City of Rancho O~,,==~3~ is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of tb~-~ Resolution, an~ (b) forthwith transmit a certified cc~y of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested, to John Mannerino at the ~ identified in City records. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adq~cion of this Resolution. PASSED, ~, And ADOPTED this 5th day of Jaunty, 1994 Alexander, Buquet, Stout, William Resolution No. 94-,DC4 Fage4 I, DEBRA J. ADAES, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamsng~, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution w~s duly passed, approved, and ad~__~d by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamon~a, California, at a regular meeting of said City C~uncil held on the 5th day of January, 1994 Executed tb~ -~ 6th day of January, 1994 at Rancho Cucam~, California. Debra J. , City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 91-381 A RESOLUTION OF 1t{E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCMO ClEAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE APPEAL OF THE FLANNING CIDMqSSION'S DECISION TO D~]qY THE AM~IqEM~f TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 FOR THE R~ TO ~ ~ HOURS OF OPERATION AND AM~N~ I}{E CONDITION OF DISTRICT AT 6620 CARN~.TAN STREET, ~ CDRNER OF SUPPORIEF -APN: 201-811-56 ~ 60 A. Recitals. (i) Jc~n Mannerino, on behalf of Sam Pelle~rino, has filed a petition to modify the Conditions of Approval for COnditioPal Use Permit 78-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit is referred to as the "a~01ication." (ii) On July 10, 1991, and continued to ~uly 24, August 14, and September 11, 1991, the Planning C~,~-ission of the City of Rancho Cucamo~gm corducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and at the conclusion of said public hearing, ad~ Resolution No. 91-131, thereby denying said application. (iii) The decision represented by said Planning OaL,,d~sion Resolution was timely appealed to this ODuncil. (iv) On October 16 and continued to No~_r 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho O~~m cc$1ductad a duly noticed public hearing on the application andc~lcluded said hearin~c$1thatdate. (v) All lec3~l prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, TM~>RE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonc/a does hereby find, determine, ar~ resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upo~ sut~-tantial evidence presented to this Council durir~ the above-referenced public hearing includin~ written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Plannin~ O ..... ~-~io~ meeting, and the contents of Planning C~x-,dssion Resolution No. 91-131, tb{-~ Council hereby specifically finds as follM: (a) The application applies to p~o~e~ located at the north- west corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets with a street fro~ of 1,037 feet and lot depth of 240 feet and is presently ~ with a shop~ir~ center.- ResoluZion No. 91-381 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a future freeway; the property to the south of that site is an existing shopping center; the property to the east is an existing shopping center; and the property to the west is existing single family residences. (c) The propused amendment contemplates exter~ the hours of operation to coincide with those established by the apD licant's alcoholic beverage control license; that is, from the current closing hours of 11:00 o'clcck P.M. to a new closing hour of 2:00 o'clock A.M., Monday through Saturday; and elating the conditions of approval prohibiting live entertainment. (d) The applicant filed the ~ application to extend the hours of operation on May 22, 1990, and the application was denied on appeal by City Council on Jamm~y 2, 1991, by adoption of their Resolution No. 91-007. (e) The Develo~mnent Code, Section 17.04.030H, states that following the denial or revocation of a Conditional Use Permit application, no application for a Conditional Use Permit for the same or substantially the same use of the same or sukBtantially the same site shall be filed within one year frcm the date of denial or revocation. (f) The applicant has been operating the business beyond the 11:00 o'clock P.M. limitation and offering live enterta~ in violation of the conditions of approval and in violation of Ordinance No. 290 pertaining to (g) The current limitation on hours of operation to 11:00 o'clock P.M. was es~bl~-~h~ as a direct result of a history of public safety and public ~ probl~ associated with this location. (h) The City h~ not received evidence that the former problemm have occurred since the ~ner's original request in May of 1990. (i) There are mitigation measures available to prevent any problems that may be creat_~a~ k~ the extension of hours of operation and provid/ng live exTcer~a/r~e~t. 3. Based upm the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings, including written and oral staff re~orts, this Council bere~y finds and concludes as follows: (a) T~at the ~v4.~-a use, together with the conditions imposed as mitigation measures, is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Page 3 (b) %~at the proposed use, together with the conditions imposed as mitigation r~-mires, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improverents in the vicinity. 4. The City Ccuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the application with the follc~ing corditions: 1) All pertinent conditions of approval as contained in Planning Ccxm%ission Resolution No. 82-98, a copy of which has been attached hereto, shall apply. 2) Ibis approval is granted for a restaurant with incidental serving of alcoholic beverages. A lunch and dinner menu shall be served to maintain the primary restaurant use. 3) The hours of operation shall be between 11:00 o'clcr. k A.M. until 2:00 o'clockA.M., MordaythroucJh Satxlzd~y. 4) The front door of the business shall renain closed durir~ evening hours (6:00 o'clock P.M.), except in the event of 5) The northwest parking area shall not be used by patrons fr~n Sam's Place and shall be appropriately pceted. 6) A ~ of two regularly employed security guards shall be requ~ed to be on the pr~m{-~s fr~n 6 o'clock P.M. until two (2) hours after the cessation of the servin~ of alcohol and any live entertajJment. At l~-~t ~ne of the shall remain on duty in the parkin~ lot and outside adjacent areas of the facility. 7) Approval of this request shall not waive c~liance with all sections of the Develo~ Code and all other applicable City Ordinances. If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects tenants, including but not limited to, noise, loitering, or di~OJrbances, the Conditional Use Permit shall be b~-ought before the Planning C~--ission for the cc{lsideration and p~esible termination of use. 5. This Council hereby p~-ovides notice to John Mannerino that the time within which judicial review of the decision re~esen~ by this Resolution njst be scught is goverTed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Raselution No. 91-381 Page 4 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested, to John Mannerino at the address identified in City records. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to t_he adoption of this Resolution. PASSe, ~, and ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 1991. Ai~, Buquet, Williams NOES: Stout, Wright ABS~4T: None Dennis L. Stout, Mayor I, Dw~A J. ADAMS, CITY c~,~K of the City of Pancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutic~ w~s duly peRsea, aperoved, and ad~ by the City Council of the City of ~ Cucamonga, California, at a rec3ular meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of December, 1991. Executed this 5th day of D~c~m~'~, California. 1991 at Rancho Cucamonga, 81 RESOLUTION NO. 91-382 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANfMO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, SUSTA/NING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION' S DECISION TO D~lqY ~ PEMMIT 91-02 FOR THE R~ TO CIDNDOCT L/VE BIqTE]~T3~IN- THE NEIGHBORFEOD CE DISTRICT AT 6620 CARNI~.TAN SIREET, NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARN~.TAN STREETS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREDF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUG{ 60 A. Recitals. (i) John Mannerino, on behalf of Sam Pellegrino, has filed an aRolication for Entertainment Permit 91-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertairmmnt Permit is referred to as the "application." (ii) On July 10, 1991, and oontinued to July 24, ALrJI/St 14, art1 Septenker 11, 1991, the Plannir~ C~,,,,~ssion of the City of Rancho C~ conducted a duly noticed public hearin~ on the application and follcTwing the conclusion of said public hearings, adopted Resolution No. 91-132, thereby denying said application. (iii) The decision represented by said Planning Oa,,xdssion Resolution wBs timely appealed to this. Council. (iv) On October 16, and continued to Nov~a3er 20, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conductad a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All legal prere~,~ites prior to the ack~tion of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NCW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, ar~ resolve as follM: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon sukstantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings including written s~ff reports, the minutes of the almove-rd~ Plannin~ Ccmmtission meeting, and the contents of Planninq C~,dssion Resolution No. 91-132, this Council hereby specifically firr~ as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the north- west corner of 19th and Carnelian Stresta with a strest frontage of 1,037 feet and lot depth of 240 feet and is presently improved with a s~in~ center. Resolution No. 91-382 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a future freeway; the prc~ to the south of that site is an existing shopping center; the property to the east is an existing shopping center; and the property to the west is existing single family' residences. (c) The applicant has been operating the business beyond the 11:00 o'clock P.M. limitation and offering live entertairment in violation of the conditions of approval as contained in Resolution Noe. 83-117 and 91-007 for Conditional Use Permit No. 78-03 and Omiinance No. 290 pertaining to Entertainment Permits. (d) The City h~ received three written c~nplaints objecting to the lateness of the hours of operation and the live entertairrent. (e) The current limitation on hours of operation to 11:00 o'clock P.M. and the elimix~tion of live entertaixmmnt were established as a direct result of a hi~ of public safetf and public m,~-~noe problems associatedwith this location. (f) The City has not received e~idence that the former problems have occurred since the owners original reques~ in May of 1990. (g) The applicant b~ sukmitted a petition of approximately 1,600 signatures in support of extenihlg the hours of operation and providirg live entertainment for Sam's Place. 3. Based upon the s,h~mntial evidence presented to this Council during the able-referenced public hearing, includirg written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The c~r~uct of the establishment or the granting of the application walld not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and (b) The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, ~,~_r, or disorderly manner; and (c) That ~ the application, together with the conditions of ap~, w~uld not create a public nuisance.; and (d) ~l~at the n~rmal operatim of the pr-m~-~ w~Lld not inter- fete with the peace and quiet of the ~ residential heir. 4. lhe City {X~n~il of the City of Pancho O~am~x~a hereb~ approves the application with the following c~nditions: 1) All pertinent conditions of ap~mmal as contained in Planning O',,,,,~Qion Resolution No. 82-98, a co~y of which b~-~ been attached hereto, shall apply. 2) The ~certainment Permit is granted for a duet only, c~lsistir~ of an acoustical guitarist and a singer. Fa, ge 2 3) Any live entertaimBnt shall ~e pr~ided bet~ 8: 00 o'clock P.M. and 2:00 o'clock A.M. ~bnday through Saturday. 4) The front and back doors of the b~in~s shall remain clo~ed during evening hcum (after 6:00 o'clock P.M.) except in the event of an emerge. 5) The ~rthwest p~king are shall not be used by pat~ frc[n Sam's Place and shall be apprc~riately posted. 6) A ~ of t~ regularly employed ~ity guards shall be required to be on tba premises fz~mn 6:00 o'clock P.M. until two hours after the cessation of the serving of alcc~ol and any live enterta~. At least one of the adjacent areas of the facility. 7) Appml of this request shall not ~ive cc~olia~ with all section of the Develo~m~t Code and all oth~ applicable City Ordi~. s) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects up~ the ~oux~i~ Midents, adjacent b~i~ arfi t~nts, i~luding but not limited to, ~i~, loit~in~, or disrobe, the Coniiti~l U~ Permit shall be b~-cught before the Plannirr/~,mmassion for the consideration and possible termination of use. 5. This C~il hereby p~ide notice to John M~i~ that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution ~ast be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Proced~e Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamcrr3a is hereby c~i ~-~ to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified col3y of this R~olution, by certified mail, ret~- ruipt requested, to John M~im at the ad~r~ identified in City records. 7. ~he City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this R~olution. PASSED, ~, and ADOITr[D this 4th day of December, 1991. Alexander, Buquet, Willia~B AYES: NOES: Stout, Wright ABe: ~ · L. Stout, Mayor Resolution No. 91-382 P-age 4 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereb~ certify that the foregoing Resolution wBs duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of December, 1991. , Executed this 5th day of ~r, 1991 at Rancho Cucamorr/a, California. Dei~ J. , City Clerk RESOLUTION 82-98 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 FOR BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOAR'S HEAD ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED IN THE RANCHO PLAZA IN THE C-1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of September, 1982, the Planning Conm~ission determined the need to suspend Conditional Use Permit 78-03 and to conduct a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, on the 27th day of October, 1982, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above item. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as follows: SECTION 1: Additional conditions and changes are found to be needed for Conditional Use Permit 78-03 in order to mitigate the past disturbances and bring the use in accord with the intent and purpose of the neighborhood shopping district. Therefore, the following conditions are added to those already in effect per Resolution 78-40: Periodic policing of the parking lot by the management of the business should be done on a nightly basis to assist in averting disturbances from patrons. Block access to the northwest parking area from the main parking area by placing large trees and planters in the driveway. Additionally, a chain or breakaway barrier shall be used to block access to this area from the rear driveway during evening hours. A sound attenuation wall shall be built on the three properties adjacent to the northwest parking area of the center. The precise height, location and construction materials shall be determind through the development of a precise development plan, which shall be prepared by the shopping center owner and reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Such improvements shall consider the use of sound attenuation material as well as some additional landscaping between the new wall and the existing wall. The plans should be prepared as soon as possible and installatiion, with the cooperation of all property owners and before the January 26, 1982 meeting scheduled by the Conmnission. Speed bumps shall be placed throughout the center· F__.× h', Resolution No. 82-98 Page 2 An analysis of the building shall be conducted to determine the needs for sound insulation. Appropriate insulation shall be installed, if needed. The rear door of the business shall remain closed during evening hours, except in the event of an emergency. The northwest parking area shall Boar's Head patrons or employees appropriately posted. not be used by and shall be This Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission on January 26, 1983, for a report on the performance of the establishment. 10. The business shall alter its operation to include restaurant usage and food service during the evening hours. This is required to meet the intent of the original approval and shall be accomplished within sixty (60) days of this action. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1982. PLANNING CO ~ ~N oF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ~ ~ ~ Jef~ '~ i ATT ~ · Secret~r Ca, ....ission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Con~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Conm~ission held on the 27th day of October, 1982, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: McNiel, King, Rempel NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Barker, Stout ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 21, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~L~ Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk , CONSIDERATION OF UPDATING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1974, CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 81000, ET SEQ. RECOMMENDATION The City Council approve Resolution No. 80-049E which is amending the City's Conflict of Interest Code for designated City personnel. Background: The attached Resolution for your approval is a requirement of The Political Reform Act of 1974, California Government Code Section 81000, et seq. This Resolution was previously updated in January, 1994, and is once again before you in order to include changes to various personnel job classification titles and job responsibilities and to designate the appropriate disclosure categories for all job classification titles. It is a requirement that the Conflict of Interest Code be amended through a public hearing, and that all affected personnel be informed of the amended Resolution which is attached. This has been accomplished through the City Clerk's office. If you have any questions regarding the approval of tt~ Resolution, please feel free to contact me. Attachment RESOI/II~ON NO. 80-049E A RESOLIrrION OF THE crrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCI~O ~, CALIFORNIA, AMtlqDING IHE CITY'S CDNFLICr OF INTEREST CODE FOR DESIGNATED CITY PERSONNEL A. Recitals. (i) This City Council, by its Resolution No. 80-049D, adopted__ F~bm~ary 1994, ericacted the Model Conflict of Interest Code promulgated by the California Fair Political Practices O',,.'.,i ~sion (2 California Code of Regulations, Section 18730). (ii) Since adoption of the City's Conflict of Interest Code, changes ~ alterations have been made with respect to the duties and responsibilities of various City employees, including changes in titles and class descriptions. (iii) Tne City Council desires to amend the City's Conflict of Interest Resolution in order to provide appropriate reporting pursuant to the California Political Reform Act of 1974 (California Gove=,a~ent Code, Section 81000, et. seq.). (iv) Pursuant to the provisions of California Gove~xment Code Section 87311, a duly noticed public hearing W'dS concluded prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determ//~ and resolve as follc~s: Resolution. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this 2. Appendex A of Resolution No. 80-049D hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as set forth in the areerred Appendix A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein as though fully set forth. 3. In all other respects, all provisions of Resolution No. 80-049D shall remain in full force and effect. 4. Tne City Clerk shall certify to the adotpion of this Resolution. Resolution No. 80-049E APPR~DIX A Disclosure CateQories Administrative Services Director Assistant City Attorney Building Official City Engir~_r City Planner C,~ei~llity Develc{~nent Director CtZatatt]rLity Services Manager Deputy Building Official Deputy City E b er Deputy City Manager Deputy City Planner Finance Officer Historic Preservation C~tutdssion t,i ht-ary Manager Park and Recreation C~mtdssion Park Planning/Development Superinterdent Plan Check Coordinator Principal Planner Public Works Engineer Public Works Maintenance Manager Records Manager (City Clerk) Recreation Superintendent Redevelo~ment Analyst Redevelopment Manager Senior Account Tech Senior Civil Engineer Senior Planner Senior Redevelo~ment Agency Analyst Traffic Engineer l&2 l&2 l&2 l&2 l&2 l&2 l&2 2 l&2 l&2 l&2 2 1 l&2 l&2 1 l&2 2 2 l&2 l&2 2 l&2 2 l&2 2 l&2 l&2 2 l&2 l&2 l&2 2 l&2 NOTE: City Council, Cit3, Manager, City Attorney, City Treasurer and Planning C~t~Lssioners are re~m~red to subnit disclosure statements pursuant to State law ( California Gove~]'.xe_nt Code, Section 87200, et. seq.), not this Code. ** With respect to consultants, the City Manager shall determine in writing if a particular consultant performs a range of duties requiring disclosure hereunder. This determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and a statement of the extent of dj-~closure requjrements. A copy of this determination shall be filed with the City Clerk and a copy forwarded to the City Council. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 21, 1994 STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Diane Williams and Rex Gutierrez City Council Mobilehome Subcommittee CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OPPOSING HR 1843 WHICH MAY REQUIRE ALL MOBILEHOME PARK DESIGNATIONS TO BE CHANGED FROM ADULT AND/OR SENIOR ONLY TO ALL FAMILY DESIGNATIONS RECOMMENDATION The City Council adopt the attached Resolution # opposing H.R.1843 as it is currently written. Analysis The Federal Government is currently proposing to mandate through legislative bill H.R. 1843 that all mobile home park designations for adult and/or senior parks be changed to family designations only. This bill would, in effect, eliminate the adult and/or senior designations completely. This legislation may also require that adult and/or senior parks be retrofitted with nursing care facilities which many adult and/or senior residents oppose. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has always supported families within the City and encourages the family oriented lifestyles and activities both within mobile home parks and the community at large. The City has also always supported the ability of all of our mobilehome park residents to choose their particular lifestyle whether it be in an adult, senior, or family designated park. The mobilehome parks within our community continue to provide a variety of lifestyles that benefit both the residents of the mobilehome parks and the community at large. This legislation as it is currently written may take away the choice of lifestyle of residents residing in mobilehome parks and we are recommending the City Council adopt the attached Resolution opposing H.R. 1843. Respectfully Submitted, Diane Willjams City Council Mobile Home Subcommittee Z~x Gutie~~mitted City Council Mobilehome Subcommittee 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCSqC/L OF ~{E CITY OF RANCID (IP. AMDNC~, CALIFORNIA, OPPOS~lqG HR 1843 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucammga has eight mobile home parks in the City designated as adult, senior, or family to aco~.~.,r~ate the various lifestyles of residents choosing to reside in ____m~bile home parks; and WHEREAS, the City of Pancho O~monga has always sup[x3rted the desires of its mobile hcee residents to dxx~a their lifestyles relative to an adult, senior, or family mobile hcee park; and WHI~qEAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is dedicated to all families within the City and ~ges family oriented life styles and activities both within mobile home parks and the c~,~unity at large; and WHEREAS, there is now proposed Federal legislation (H.R. 1843) whirl1 is proposing to mandate that all mobile heine parks be designated as family parks and the designations of adult and senior parks be eliminated; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to argue strenuously against mandates of any kind and especially unfunded mandates; and WHEREAS, this legislation may require our existing adult and senior mobile hc~e parks be retrofitted to accommodate nursing care facilities; and WHI~EAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonqa believes the combination of adult, senior, and family mobile bame parks offers successful benefits to both the residents residing in these respective, designated parks and the c~m.,unity at large; and NC~, ~{EREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Rand~ Cucamonga opposes H.R. 1843 as it is currently written because it mandates that the lifestyles of our adult and senior parks must be changed without regard and/or input frce those residents choosing to reside in the adult and senior mobile hcee parks. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~ Charles J. Buquet II, Mayor Pro Tem CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THEHABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR WILDLIFEAND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY RECOMMENDATION: The City Council adopts the attached Resolution in support of the concept of habitat conservation. BACKGROUND: As a follow-up to the August 3rd SANBAG Board meeting, a meeting was conducted by County Supervisor Jerry Eaves on August 31, 1994, to determine the interest level of public agencies in creating/joining a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The plan would ultimately identify sensitive habitat areas, identify methods of preserving habitat, and in turn, endangered or threatened species; and identify funding sources for the acquisition of sensitive habitat. The purpose of the meeting was to determine if there was support among the local agencies and public utilities for the creation of an HCP. Without local agency commitments, Supervisor Eaves believes there is no point in moving forward with the plan. Supervisor Eaves has requested a response from local agencies on the HCP by October 1, 1994. The attached draft Resolution (see Exhibit "B") has been provided by Supervisor Eaves for review and, hopefully, adoption by cities in the San Bernardino Valley. ANALYSIS: The theory behind the formation of the HCP is that habitat areas would be set aside as mitigation for present and/or future development within sensitive habitat areas. This process would eliminate the need to provide mitigation on a project-by-project basis but, rather, would provide mitigation for the entire area included within the HCP. In reviewing the proposal by Supervisor Eaves, there are several factors that should be considered by the Council. These factors include the following: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN September 21, 1994 Page #2 Initially, staff time and resources will be required to gather and disseminate information. The draft Resolution provided by Supervisor Eaves does contain language about monetary participation with an amount "to be determined,,. It should be made clear to the Supervisor that the City is not authorizing any expenditure of funds at this time and that any request for monetary participation must be authorized by the City Council in the future. The majority of "sensitive habitat', is outside the city limits of the City. Supervisor Eaves stated that, while no funding formula has been devised, the monetary impact to cities should be based on the extent of sensitive habitat within the community. This would imply that Rancho Cucamonga's contribution would be minimal because of the small area of sensitive habitat that could be developed within the City. Over the past 2 years, numerous conversations have occurred about conservation plans (specially the Natural Conservation Communities Plan). In these conversations, the City has stated that project mitigation for development of sensitive habitat could be handled effectively through the Development Review process and that joining a conservation plan was not necessary. The estimated cost of HCP preparation is estimated to be between $1.8 and $2.2 million. All funding sources including State and Federal sources will be explored to fund the plan, thereby minimizing the financial impact to local jurisdictions. This estimate does not include implementation of the plan, which, in all likelihood, will be extremely expensive. Currently, federal funds are being used to assist in the creation and implementation of Natural Conservation Communities Plans. It may be possible to obtain some funds for the HCP. It is not likely that funds will be available to cover the entire cost of the HCP formulation. Formation of a Joint Powers Authority or other administrative structure will be necessary to implement the plan. It is believed the extend of financial involvement would be defined at that time. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN September 21, 1994 Page #3 Respectively submitted, Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tem Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Supervisor Eaves Exhibit "B" - Draft Resolution submitted by Supervisor Eaves Exhibit "C" - Press release from Department of the Interior Exhibit "D" - Sensitive biological areas map Resolution in support of the HCP co: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner · oarb of uperu ors (Eountl2 of ernarhtno JERR~Z EAVES SUFfERViSOR. ~TM DI~TI~ICT September 7, 1994 Dennis L. Stout, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Resolution of Support for the Valley-Wide Habitat Conservation Plan Dear~~'' As you may recall, following the August 3 SANBAG meeting, I presented a program intended to resolve the conflicts between endangered species and development within the San Bernardino Valley. The concept of a Valley-wide, Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) was presented and received favorable review as a sound approach to resolve these problems. The preparation of an HCP is envisioned as a broad based coalition of cities, the county, major utilities, water districts, environmental groups, private landowners and developers. At the conclusion of the meeting, it was suggested that a steering committee be formed to discuss in more detail the initial actions required to proceed with such a plan. The first meeting of the steering committee was held on August 31, 1994. It was the consensus of those in attendance that this project will not go forward without the support of all the cities within the valley. The committee agreed that a resolution from the cities expressing their support would demonstrate the necessary commitment to move forward with this project. A model resolution was presented to the committee for discussion, and the committee suggested some minor changes. A copy of the revised model resolution is enclosed. ,a The committee requests that each city in the valley adopt this model resolution, or one very similar to it, demonstrating the city's support for this conservation effort. We ask that this be done by October 1, 1994, so that we might proceed with the plan in earnest. j E P 12 199, OF RANCHO CUCAMONc San Bernara~no County Government Center · 385 NOrth Arrowneat A.er~.~ · Sdrl ;..r...r,.; ..... ,:A .~Z4.' 5 .~ ' ': * 339 3e" 455E Dennis L. Stout September 7, 1994 Page 2 I would appreciate your assistance in expediting your city's adoption of this Resolution of Support so that we will be able to move forward with this plan that is so essential to the economic well-being of our valley. Please send a copy of the adopted resolution to Randy Scott of the San Bernardino County Planning Department at 385 N. Arrowhead Ave., Third Floor, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182. If you have any questions concerning this request, please call Randy or Jim Squire at (909) 387-4099. Sincerely, Supervisor, Fifth District JE:JS CC: Jack Lam, City Manager Scott Murphy, Associate Planner Tom Laurin, Director, County ECD Enclosure DRAFT Model Resolution # A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING A PROGRAM TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY. WHEREAS, grave concern is mounting throughout the communities in the valley area of San Bernardino County as the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) continues the process of evaluating various candidate animal and plant species that are found in the area to determine if they should be listed as being either endangered or threatened pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA); and WHEREAS, the County, in cooperation with local jurisdictions, public agencies and private enterprises, proposes to prepare a valley-wide multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in order to resolve the inherent conflicts between land development and rare, threatened and endangered species preservation; and WHEREAS, a proactive approach to this important issue is essential to ensure the economic well-being of all interests, both public and private, within the San Bernardino Valley; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive HCP will vastly improve the position of all the jurisdictions to provide for the development needed to create the employment opportunities that are so essential to the economic vitality of the valley area and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City will support the preparation of an HCP for the San Bernardino Valley encompassing the area generally bounded by the county lines between San Bernardino County and Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside Counties on the west and south and the San Bernardino National Forest Boundary on the north and east. and agrees to participate in a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) or other administrative structure, as deemed appropriate, to implement the plan. Section 2. The City will support this effort both by dedicating city staff time to supply the necessary data required for preparation of an HCP and monetarily, in an amount that is mutually agreed to in a fair and equitable manner between all of the local jurisdictions participating in the HCP preparation. '/ DRAFT I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted Mayor and Common Council of the City of at a meeting thereof, held on the ,1994, by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: AYES NAY~ ABSFNT ABSTAIN by the day of The forgoing resolution is hereby approved this 1994. City Clerk day of Mayor of the City of Approved as to form and legal content: City Attorney OFFICE OF THE ~ECRaTA~Y August ~ ~ 1994 DOI: Bob Walker 202/208-6416 Georgia ;arham 202/20S-4131 DOt: Lauri Arguelles 202/482-6090 ADMINISTRATIO~,S NEW A~SURA~CR POLZCY TELLS T--~NDOWN2R~: nNO SUR~aISBS· IN ENDANGEaBD BPBCI=S PLANNING The Clinton A~minisnra=ion today a~ounced & s~gnific&nC Change in DOlicV chac will give more economic cerEalnoV land~wners'involve~ in reconciling. e.dangered species conservation wiz~ land use develo~=nen~. Landowners who have endangered species habitat on :~ei= property and agree co a ~ahitat Conservation Plan (HOP) under :he Endangered Species Act w~11 no= be subJec~ co 1scar ~emands for a larger lan~ or fina-~cial commitment if =he Plan is achhered ~o even iJ =he needs of the species chan~es over time. The term of an HOP can be as long as several decades. eA Deal is a Dee1- "we're telling landowners chaca ~eal said. "This aevelopmenz or land'use, you invest m~ney and land inns sav.~g species, we won't c~me ~ack can years from now and say yo~ have co pay more or give more.. ".--he key issue for non-federal landowners is ceruainu7,~ sa~d Babbitt. "They wa~= =o k~w ~ha~ iE ~ ~e a ~o~ fa!n~ ef crn ~: pl~ ~ead for species conse~nion, a~ do so in cooperation with the rele~= agencies, =hen =heir 1in wo 'n r~p~ed out from~der nhe~y years d~ =he roadT' n be "we'll work with state, munic~pal and private landowners to sen the rules,e said Ba3:bi~t. "This assurance Policy makes =~ clear that we won't change those rules in the middle of the ga~e." 'This is a good example of how the Department of Con~nerce as represented specifically by its National Oceanic an~A~mospheric Administration (NOAA) is working with ocher federal &cantles :o make :he Endangered Species Act wor~ me~e e~fecclvelyT. said Secretary of ConThefts Ronald H. Brown. (too:e) 100 in every case, ~ere ~sed, :heF w~ll D~ovlde ce:~a!n~y ~usinesse~ ~a~ need :o address !ong-~e~v~ ~arming and a~ s~me ulme provide uhe flex!Di!lzY needed =o meet the icn.c-=ervn needs o= va:!ous species," said NOAA's Undersecrezary for Cceans and Azmcsphere ac Commerce, Dr. james Baker, who par:ic!~amed in the press conference today with NOAA'S Naclcnal ~Arine Fisherice Service (-NMFS) and In:or!or Depar=men~'s Fish and Wiidli~e goryice are ~he ~ederal agenoise respcnsib!e for en.~orcing :he Endangered $~ecies Ac:. As such, they ara also emRcwered :o approve MC~s. "The assurances offered by ~his new policy shoul~ s=~mu!a:e greaner use o~ habi=a= conserva:iOn planning :o reconcile developmen= and conserva:lon conflic=s,- sai~ Michael Bean~ cf =he Envircrunen:a! Defense Fund. · Success~u! habizau conserrs:ion plans are win-wla si=ua:ions -- economic acziv!=y con=inues and our her~uage is '- proroomed for fu:ure genera=ions ~o enjoy,. said. john Sawhill of The Nauure Conservancy. P~si~lve ~e&c=~om :F.A ~he B~siness "This new ini=la~tve maV resolve ~he business commun~ mos= In:racna~le concerns abou: :he Endangered Species jim ~'halen. a spokes~erson for :he Alliance for Conservation0 a group of ma~or lam~owners holding more 70.000 acTee in SarxDiego Coun=y0 "A ma~or !m~edimenn =o pro~eruy owner Parnic~anion in a Conservation Plan is :he fear =ha~, after nhe ccsus and resource managemen: res:ric~ions of =he Plan are accep:ed, :he rules will change and ~e ennire mau~er will be reopened," said Don Chrisziansen, Chairman o= ~he Wes=ern Urban Wa:er Users Coali:ions. ~This policy lens a=l lmporna=~ new direcrOon by which :he key federal agencies are co niu:ing :o snand =heir agreemenm. In :he Wesn. we value ~ac con~lzmenc.~ The wesuern Urban water Coal!=ion, s supporn is s!gn!fican: because i: represshue 18 major wa:er unili~ies from seven Wes:ern szames serving more :has 30 million wa=er users. Included are eysuems serving Denver, $ai: Lake Ci=y, Phoenix, Las Vegas and once= Nevada cities, PorEland, Sea~:le, Los Angeles, San Francisco and numeEous G=her Ca!i=ornla c~ies. ' "Private =ores: landowners nee~ suabiliuF and ceruainuy make che long =e.-m invesr_menns necessar~=o manage private forsen!ands,- said Cbar!ey BAngham. Weyerhaeuser Company's Execuclve Vice President.. 'we commend =he Secreuarles for advancing ideas uha: will help provide Sma~lli:y. for fores~ -=- 101 -land~w~e=s w~o ~eve~op &=d tzn~lemeA~ ~a-3o~&~ :o=se=v&=i~= weyerhaeuser ls curren=ly developing an HCP for spoc=e~ owls in ~regon and pioneering a mulci-s~ecies HOP iu-Washing:on. 'SSnce :he incep=ion of :he Nanural ConTnuni=!es Conservation plan (NCC~) concep=, we have been working with rePresen=a=ives o~ zhe Fish and Wildlife Service to develop assurances for landowners which are commensura=e winh their comi=men:s :o hablta: ~ro~ecnion,. sald Ktchar~ Broming, Vice President of uhe ' ' P g ose ass~ra/~ce8 stage are designed to meec bo=h seats and federal endangered species requirements, nhereby allowing ~or developmen: An areas wher~ =hreacened or endangered species occur. ) · Lack of cer:atncy has been a mayo= obsnacle co Zarge sca~e priva=e conserve:ion 1arming,. Said Moni=a ~lo=ian, SenAor Vice mporEan~ show ~f good fai=h :ha= nhe ~overnmenn ~nCends ~ live by ius =ommi~men=s in aperoved NCCPs.. v--"Aowner tomterns Led =o A~lo~e AZ a June 14 press conference. :he two DeparV~nen~s announced a series of policies aimed a= improviDg =he =ndangered Species Act's ef=ectiveness while exxhanctn~ t=s ZlexlbilA=y for businesses and privane landowners. labblue and Baker said coday,s announcemenn was spurred by private, suace and municipal landowners, who have complained =hat, despi=e their willingness =6 work wi~h =he =ederal government co prose:= epicAss on :heir land, =he federal governmenu had been relucnanu n~ assure =hem im reuurn uhau am HOP would noc be reopened or changed an an~ nime. In =he past. landowners have feared bein informed an a later date than despl~e their.earlier good-fa=Uh conservation e~forts, =he demand for addinional Procecnion measures for species would hal= planned developmen= and land use or resulu addi~ional tee:rio=ions and require more priva='e funding. Bahbin= said uoday's announcemenn gives landowners an lncen=lue co ge= involved in an HC~ plannin~ e2for= by assuring uhem n~a= :he federal governmen~ will snack by its deal wi:h the HOP pernttccees who abide by ~heir conserve=ion ccaTenAtmen~s in good faith. ~. -3- 102 The new policy assures =ha= landowners ~ar=lclpaci~g in a ' lis~ed ks en~an~erea'cr =hrea:ened. If extraordinary &c:icn :o protect such species, the new policy s=aces :.ha: :he obligauZcn for addiuional ac:Ion shall not res= with an =C~ ~e--m-i==ee. -- - MC~'s are authorized under sect!on 1O(a) o= the Endangered Species Ac: as a means of reconciling endangered species conservation and -habi:a: pro:ec~ion wi~h prlva:e la~d developmen= :hat migh: ocherwise be im~ossib!e wiEhou= violaning :he Acz. An HCP requires a !andowner ~o develop a Iong-uerm, ~:ivane co=~serva:ion program for lisned species aZfecned ~y developmen: acuivi:ies w!~!~ ~he boun~aries of =he ~CP. ' More HC"Ps kS a ameUl~ . "This new policy will be g~d for :he endangered species program because in will encourage developers no make su~s=&n:ial com~inmenZs Co HCP's,. Mabbi'c~ said. "A= ~he same =!me, 1: will be good for ~he privane landowners because :hey will be assure~ nha~ :hey will have time no com~le=e Significaua~ develcpmenn prc~ecns or :o manage :heir lan~s winh cer=ain:y for years come, wi~houu che posei~iliny o~ facing ad44~ona1 cosns or res=ricuions for endangered species UPPer the =ew ~oli~y, if &~i=ional mi=igaCiom measures are subsequennly deeme~iuecessary ~o provide for nhe conninued exis:ence of a species in :he wil~, nhe primary obliganion for such measures shall no~ teen wi~h &n MCP permi=~ee who has been com~!ying in good fal=hw~=h his or her obligealone under a~ MCP. Iz NMFS or the U.9. Fish and Wildlife Service concludes t~ac exzraordinary circumsnances wartann ~he requiremean of addi~iona~ mi:igan!on from an MCP permiC=ee, such mi=igaCion shall be ' limized uo mo~if!caCions wiuhin C~nserve~E Habitat areas or ~o 6he MC~'S omera~kng conservation programs for :he affec=ed species. Addiuio~a! minigaEion requiremencs shall non &~ly :o the ~a en: for developmen~ or land . - 103 'ou~ po~nu is ~ simple ~ne,- sa~d ~abbi=~. "~ we've .'~de a de&l, and i~ i~#s being i~mp~emen~ed according ~'~he cr~ueria se~ 'or~h in ~ha~ plan, we're nod going co be asking ~or more money ir m~re land.. - NNP~ and the U.S. Wish and w~ldlife Service will have uhe burden of demonstrading than ex:raOrCinary circumsUances exist, using the beau sciennific and commercial dace available. The agency ~indlngs mus= ~e clearl~ documen=ed and based upc~ reliable uechnica! informa~ion regarding the s=a~us and habi:a~ requiremenus of the affected species. The Fish and wildliZe Service has compleued a drafu handbook, 'Polic~ and Guidelines for Habiuat Conservezion Planning and Processing of Incidental Take Permius., Tn!s new handbook will serve as a guide for Service emploFees engaged in the ne~ouiauion of HC~s. The Service innends =o provide an opporuunicy for public commen~ on nhe draf~ handbook. The polic~ annodnced ~Oday will be included in =hen dra=n handbook, ar.d will nherefore be available =or pua)lic comment. -POX- 104 Delhi Sands Glasslandllem&nenl IAI5S RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAM TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY WHEREAS, concern is mounting throughout the communities in the valley area of San Bernardino County as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) continues the process of evaluating various candidate animal and plant species that are found in the area to determine if they should be listed as either endangered or threatened pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA); and WHEREAS, the County, in cooperation with local juris- dictions, public agencies and private enterprises, proposes to prepare a valley-wide multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in order to resolve the inherent conflicts between land development and rare, threatened, and endangered species preservation; and WHEREAS, a proactive approach to this important issue is essential to ensure the economic well-being of all interests, both public and private, within the San Bernardino Valley; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive HCP will vastly improve the position of all jurisdictions to provide for the development needed to create the employment opportunities that are so essential to the economic vitality of the valley area and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City will support the preparation of an HCP for the San Bernardino Valley encompassing the area generally bounded by the county lines between San Bernardino County and Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside Counties on the west and south and the San Bernardino National Forest on the north and east, and agrees to participate in a Joint Powers Authority or other administrative structure as deemed appropriate to implement the plan. 2. The City will support this effort by dedicating City staff time to supply the necessary data required for preparation of an HCP. Any request for a monetary contribution, in an amount that is mutually agreed to in a fair and equitable manner between all of the local jurisdictions participating in the HCP, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council. RESOLUTION NO. Page #2 3. It is the intent and desire of this Council that any monetary contribution be based on the extent of sensitive habitat and the potential impact to that habitat which is located within the incorporated area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Resolution. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this 107 Award Presented to Hank Stickney from Rancho Cucamonga City Council September 21, 1994 Approximate time 7:10 PM i'rier to award - Mayor Stout invites Quakes' owner Hank Stickney to the podium. '. la','er Stout: "For anyone who might have missed the excitement in Rancho Cucamonga l:~st Thursday, we have a brief recap." Or words to that effect... Drop lights if possible \'ideo - cued up with last Modesto batter; start with zero volume on audio and bring :;ou!ld up to desired level. Run video through celebration on the mound. Drop sound when announcer Joe Castellano says, "Rancho Cucamonga Quakes, 1994 California League Champions." Stop tape. Lights up. About three minutes. if lights are dropFed, Tremor will sneak into the chamber. If lights are on, he will make an entrance when the film concludes. Tremor will great the mayor, council members, Jack i_.am, and city attorney. He will go to the mayor's chair, sit down and pick the gavel. i tank or the Mayor will say, "No, Tremor! Up here." One minute, thirty seconds ]'dayor Stouts makes presentation to Hank. Reads copy. i t:-w.k will then present Mayor Stout on behalf of the city of Rancho Cucamonga with ireins fi'om the 1994 season. Read Bulletin copy. Two minutes i'~',ctos taken by Bulletin photographer: Mayor, Hank, Tremor. Thirty seconds '/rcmor departs out the back waving to the audience. Jack Lam Jerry Fulwood Debbie Adams Hank Stickney Tremor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT September 21, 1994 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Jack Lam, City Manager ~ t.~.~/~/ Suzanne Ota, Community S~~ Manager'I Lease Agreement with Lewis Homes Agenda Item #D(8) It is requested that this item be removed from the Council's agenda. The insurance provisions of the agreement are being finalized, and we hope to bring this item back to the Council at their next meeting. Thank you. so/lewis DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMO RAND UM .-: September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Request to Continue September 21, 1994 City Council Agenda Item under ~Council Business, Item 1." Adoption of Resolution Applicable to HR 1843. Staff requests that this item be continued to the October 5th, 1994, City Council meeting. This will allow staff sufficient time to review additional information that has been presented to the City. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 21, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: ez pmeDJ~--qLlrecto BY: Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engine~~SEC~- // // SUBJECT: NEWS ARTICLE ON ACCIDENTS AT I IOnS / An article in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on September 19, 1994 covered what were called the ten worse intersections in the area ann listed the locations of the ten intersections including five in Rancho Cucamonga. The article was presented in a sensational ized manner with a headl ine apparently intended to upset rather than inform the reader. The article went on to discuss various aspects of the raw numbers of accidents presented and was accompanied by a chart showing daily traffic counts at the intersections. A1 though an accompanying separate article somewhat discussed the difficulty of finding accurate accident statistics and comparing them among different cities, it was not obvious that the article was based on meaningless accident numbers obtained from statistics assembled in a very short time obtained from various pol ice departments. This raw data was used by an untrained person and resulted in accident information unrelated to the actual accident experience at the intersections. As far as we can tell, the accident information presented in the article was for calendar year 1993, even though the author indicates the information is from May 1993 to May 1994. Even if one assumes the information is as presented, each City uses a different method for recording accident data. Unless all accident data is brought back to a common demoninator, the information presented as a comparison is useless. For example, the City of Rancho Cucamonga records all accidents to a distance of 200 feet from the intersection. The City of Upland records only accidents that occur within the actual intersection itself. Other cities may use other methods for recording recordation of accidents. Obviously, unless all of these recording methods are similar, any comparison of data will not be relevant. Accidents are normally referenced to an intersection because this is the easiest way to identify an accident location. An untrained person would assume far too many accidents to occur at a mentioned intersection unless the information obtained is accurately analyzed. In some cases accidents in driveways near to intersections are more numerous than accidents that occur within the intersection itself. A good example, is the situation at McDonalds restaurant on Foothill near Archibald. There are many accidents at this location due to people turning in and out of the restaurant and other businesses. These accidents are all related back to the intersection of Foothill and Archibald. They are not accidents occurring within the actual intersection i tsel f. NEWS ARTICLE ON ACCIDENTS AT INTERSECTIONS September 21, 1994 Page 2 At the intersections mentioned for Rancho Cuamonga in the article, most accidents occurred at ~riveways for nearby shopping centers. The actual numbers af accidents in the intersection are much much less. The attached chart shows the accident comparison for the various cities in the article using data at the actual intersection itself. As can be seen from the chart the City of Rancho Cucamonga intersections rate much better in this comparison. The article also mentions the City of Fontana with a very busy intersection { Sierra and Val 1 ey) with only a smal 1 amount of traffic accidents. In talking with the City of Fontana Traffic Engineering Department we found the city only records traffic accidents where injuries occur. They do not record property damage accidents. This accounts for the low totals as shown in the newspaper article(15). If we take the intersection of Foothill and Archibald, which was supposedly the worse intersection in the County and compare a~ainst the intersection in Fontana, we find there were fifteen accidents in Fontana with injury related and only five at the Foothill/Archibald intersection. So we could say Sierra and ~y is three times worse than Archibald and Foothill! Again this comparison shows the erroneous use of the data that the newspaper reporter used. ~ancho Cucamonga Police write up virtually every accident and the Engineering Department also uses all recorded accidents in our work. We feel this is important to get a true picture of what is happening in and near an intersection. Deleting data normally does not provide a true accurate picture of what is really going on and is not in the best interest we feel to the City. We do not play games with accident data. What other agencies do however, is beyond our control and can lead to unfair comparisons. The attached chart from the City's Annual Report shows accidents have steadily decreased over the past three years (page 9) and our streets are consistently below the Statewide average for accident occurrence (page 4). The report shows the property damage accidents are about four times as frequent as our injury accidents. The report also shows an even greater difference at major intersections whereas the attached chart shows only three to six injury accidents occurred last year, making much buslet intersections in Rancho Cucamonga safer than for instance in Fontana where only fatal and injury accidents are reported. When accidents are compared to the volumes at intersections (the accident rate) our intersections are well within the parameters established for the general surveilance of intersection safety. It should also be noted that three of the five of the Rencho Cucamonga intersections mentioned are on State Highways, two being on Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard) which is the busiest street in the valley. Considering the difficulty in achieving greater safety solutions on State Highways the low accident rates on Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamonga are remarkable. Even so, most of the accident activity does not occur at the intersections mentioned but rather at nearby businesses. Virtually all of which were designed and built prior to incorporation of the City. Thus driveways are far closer to the intersections than they should be. The newspaper article points out the misuse and the abuse which is possible when untrained or misdirected people make use of accident statistics. NEWS ARTICLE ON ACCIDENTS AT INTERSECTIONS September 21, 1994 Page 2 Unfortunately most accident data kept by cities is a matter of public record and cannot be kept from such people. An attempt was made in this case to talk to the reporter and editor responsible for this article prior to its being published. The editor was not available and the reporter chose to go ahead with the misleading numbers and use the accompanying short article as an explanation or apology for what was in the main article. A final note is that no fatal accident occurred at Archibald and Foothill during 1993 or 1994. This fact was pointed out to the reporter but was still included incorrectly in the article. RG :WJO: dl w Attac hmen ts CITY 1. Rancho Cucamonga Foothtl 1/Archibal d 2. Rancho Cucamonga BaseLine/Carnel ian 3. Rancho Cucamonga BaseLine/Archibal d 4. Chino Central/Phil a. 5. Rancho Cucamonga Foothil 1/Vineyard 6. Upl and Foothil 1/Mountain 7. Montclair Central/Moreno 8. Montclair Central/Fourth 9. C1 aremont I-lO/Indian Hill 10. Rancho Cucamonga 19th/Carne1 Jan DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT 63,500 54,100 58,600 59,600 59,700 50,000 46,000 ¢4,000 N/A 34,700 ACCIDENT COUNT NEWS WITHIN ARTICLE 100' 70 31 53 22 47 14 46 46* 45 18 32 32** 31 31 26 26 26 26 26 13 * - Within 300 feet of the intersection )Data ** - Within 50 feet of the intersection ) for 100' not avail able RERAII(IN~ BASED ON ACCIDENTS WITHIN 100 ' OF INTERSECTION CITY 1. Rancho Cucamonga Foothil 1/Archibal d 1. Montclair 31 Central/Moreno 2. Mon tcl a i r 26 Central/Fourth 3. C1 aremont 26 I-lO/Indian Hill 4. Rancho Cucamonga 22 BaseLine/Camel Jan 5. Rancho Cucamonga 18 Foothil 1/Vineyard 6. Rancho Cucamonga 13 BaseLine/Archibal d 7. Rancho Cucamonga 13 19th/Carnel jan 8. Chino 46* Central/Phil a. 9. Upland 32** Foothil 1/Mountain ACCIDENT COUNT WITHIN 100' 31 * - Within 300 feet of the intersection )Data for 100' not available ** - Within 50 feet of the intersection ) 1'400 -- 1200 -- Traffic Accident Summary (Severity of Injury) 1049 1033 978 315 339 · 275 242 0__~136 3 9 · ' . - Fatal Injury PDO I ~ Pt D .... ·-~ *of~ t~ amaze Only g 1394 1229 892 Total City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 OR 3 LANES Sapphire St. Lemon St. He!!man Ave. Statewide 4 OR MORE UNDIVIDED Vineyard Ave. Archibald Ave. Base Line Rd. Statewide 4 OR MORE DIVIDED Mi!liken Ave. Foothill Bivd. Haven Ave. Statewide 1993 Annual Traffic Report 0.2 0.48 0.59 1993 Accident Rates 1.53 1.39 1.87 0.98 1.72 ]2.23 2.91 ]O.84 1.88 1 1.5 2 2.5 Rate - Accidents per Million Vehicle Miles 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: September 7, 1995 Jill Ecoff, Records Clerk City Clerk's Office Shirr'l Griffin, Secretary ORDINANCE 536 Please replace the previous copy of Ordinance 536 (the Sign Ordinance) with the attached copy. Exhibit "A", 14.20.100, Permitted Signs - Commercial and Office Zones, has been corrected. This information will appear in the City's Municipal Code. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at extension 2011. Thank you! \sg Attachment(s) CC; District Attorney's Office City Attorney Book Publishing Company k,. ORDINANCE NO. 536 AN C~DINANCE OF I~E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC~O (IK2AM~J~A, CATJFORNIA, APPROV/NG SIGN ORDINANCE ~ 94-01, AM~qDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANC~O CIEAMDNGA M~NICIPAL CODE A. Recitals (i) On June 22, and continued to July 27, 1994, the Planning Cu~mdssion of the City of Rancho O~camonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Sign Ordinance Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Cc~m~-~ion adopted Resolution No. 94-01, thereby recuumending t_hat the City Council adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 94-01. (ii) On September 7, 1994, the City Ccucil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga corrkxcted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All legal prerec?~ ~ites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SFiTION 1: Section 14.20,100, Subsection 2. Business identi- fication (businesses within shopping centers), is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A." SECTION 2: read as follows: Section 14.16,022 iS hereby added to Chapter 14.16 to 14.16.022 Traffic hazards. All signs and sign structure shall be subject to the following: No sign or sign structure shall be erected at the intersection of any street or at any driveway acces-~ to a street in a way that obstructs free and clear vision of pedestrians and vehicular traffic; No sign or sign structure sial/ be erected at any location where, by reason of the position, shape, illumination, or color, it my interfere with, obstruct authorized traffic sign, signal, or No sign or sign structure shall be erected that m~ the use of the words "STOP," '~OC~," '~%N~ER," or any ot]:mr' Ordinance No. 536 Page 2 word, phrase, sl~bol, or character in such a manner as to interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic. SEETION 3: read as follows: Section 14.16.023 is hereby added to Chapter 14.16 to 14.16.0 2 3 Illuminated sign nuisances. Sig~s illumina~ internally er externally shall 1~ located or shielded so as to prevent amy glare from the bulb, tubes, or other illumination devices from falling upon adjacent property or street rights-or-wa~. S~LTION 4: to read as follows: Section 14.16.020.M. is hereby added to Chapter 14.16 SEETION 5: Section 14.04.010, Subsection A, of Chapter 14.04 is hereby amended to read as follows: 14.04.010 Declaration of n~. A. The city recognizes the nd for signs as a means to advertise and identify businesses within the c~,,~unity. Tne city finds that signing is an important design element of the physical envY. Pfovisicrs consistent with the goals and objectives of the cubing,unity are necessary to ensure that the special character and image the c~Lmunity is striving for can be attained while serving business needs in the c ,,, unity. The city is striving to provide an econcm~ically stzble and visually attractive c~munity through high quality site planning, building designs, landscaping, and signing. As a planned architectural feature, a sign can be pleasing and can harmonize with the physical character of its environment. Proper controls can achieve this goal and will make the city a more attractive place to live, work, and SEETION 6: to read as follows: Section 14.08.210 of Chapter 14.08 is hereby amended 14.08.210 Monument sign. '~onument sign" means a free-star~ir~ sign incorporating the design and kuilding materials accenting the architectural theme of the buildings on the same property. Ordinanoe No. 536 Page 3 SECT/ON 7: read as follows: Section 14.08.331 is hereby added to Chapter 14.08 to 14 · 08 · 331 Sign structure. "8igD structure' means a structure of any kind, includ]ag supports, uprights, lmse, guys, -n~o~s, hi-doing, f~k, and any decoration of the sign upon which a sign SECT/ON 8: to read as follows: Section 14.24.070 of Chapter 14.24 is hereby amended 14.24.070 Illumination and motion. Monument signs sha] 1 be nonmoving stationary structures (in all cumponents) and illumination, if any, shall be maintained by artificial light which is stationary and constant in intensity and color at all times (nonflR-~hing). Internal illumination is preferred; if ,eternal illtnnination is used, conoe~led or deoorative fixtures shall be used. SlgCTION 9: to read as follows: Section 14.20.040 of Chapter 14.20 is hereby amended 14.20.040 Special event signs. Special event signs my be approved for a limited period of time in any zoning district as a means of publicizing special events such as carnivals, festivals, charitable events, and Christmas tree lots, in oonjunction with a Temporary Use Permit. To apply for approval of special event signs, any business or property owner must sukmit an application with the city planning division which describes the proposed sign by me_~__ns of a sketch and the display dates for review and approval. Such special event signs shall be limited to the following provisions: No more than one special event sign shall be permitted per activity and shall be either a wall, window, or ground sign, and use of flags, banners, and pennants. All special event signs shall be a maximum of fifty square feet and shall be posted below the roof or shall be no higher than eight feet in the case of a ground -~ign. Special event signs shall be limited to forty-five days per calendar year. Ordinance No. 536 Page 4 SECT/ON 10 to read as follows: Section 14.20.041 of Chapter 14.20 is hereby amended 14.20. 041 Temporary advertising signs. A tempo~ advertising sign may .be approved for a tamporary period of time, as specified in tbi-~ section, for ~m~ercial and industrial uses. The signs may be used to promote the sale of new products, new tenant, new management, new hours of operation, a new service, or to prumota a special sale. Any business or property owner desiring to use a temporary advertising sign must file an application and drawing or photograph with the city planning division for review and approval. The use of such signs is subject to the following limitations: No more than one sign shall be permitted per activity or business. The sign shall be a temporary sign designed either as a wall sign, window sign, or ground sign. The sign can be in the form of a banner or pennant. Tne sign shall not exceed fifty square feet and shall be posted below the roof. In the case of a ground sign, the height of the sign shall not exceed eight feet. The sign shall be limited to a display period of at least seven days. Nine such periods shall be permitted for each calendar year, not to ~xc~.~- a total of 63 days per year. A m~x~,~wq of four a/low a single sign to be displayed for u~ to 28 days; otherwise, a m{.~ of display periods. SECT/ON 11: read as follows: Section 14.20,045 is hereby added to Chapter 14.20 to 14.20.045 Grand opening signs. A grand opening sign my be 44~v~ed for a temporary period of time in any zoning district to advertise a ne~ business or a change of business ~ame following a closure. Any business or L.u.,-~u.L~ owner desiring to use a grand opening sign must file an Ord~ No. 536 Page 5 application together with a drawing or photograph to the city's p~-n~ng division for review and prior to opeD~ng or within the first 60 days of operation. The use of such signs is subject to the followlax/l{m{tations: No more than one sign shall be permitted The sign shall be a tempox-al7 sign designed either as a wall, w]mdow, or grou~ sign. The sign can be in the form of a banner or pennant. The sign shall not exceed 50 square feet and shall be posted below the roof. In the case of a ground sign, the height of the sign shall not -~ceed S feet. The sign shall be limited to a display period not to exceed 30 days prior to opening and 60 days after opening, for a total display period of 90 days. S~"F/ON 12: The Council firas and determines that the project identified above in this Ordinance is exempt frc~n the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines prceulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of the State C~A Guidelines. S~CTION 13: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, AP~, and ADOPIeD this 21st day of September, 1994 Alexander, Buquet, Gutierrez, Stout, Williams AYES: NOES: None ABS~qT: None Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Ordinance No. 536 Page 6 I, DRRRA J. ADAMS, CITY c;.RRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 7th day of September, 1994, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21st day of Septemker, 1994. Executed this 22nd day of Se~, California. 1994, at Rancho Cucamonga, 14.20,100 Permitted Signs - Commercial and Office Zones - The following signs may be permitted in the commercial and office zones subject to the provisions listed: CLASS SIGN TYPE MAXIMUM NUMBER Business Identification Wall One per building face, a (business not within maximum of three per shopping centers business. including single tenant office buildings). and Monument One per street frontage, a maximum of 2 per business. Business identification Wall One per building face, a (businesses within maximum of 3 for any one shopping centers). business. and Monument One per street frontage. MAXIMUM SIGN AREA 10% of the building face, not to exceed 150 square feet. 24 square feet. 10% of the building face, not to exceed 150 square feet. 24 square feet. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Not to project above the roof and in no case be higher than 20 feet from finished grade. Up to 8 feet. Not to project above the roof and in no case be higher than 20 feet from finished grade Up to 8 feet. REMARKS A combination of monument and wall signs may be used; however, only a maximum of three signs may be used to identify any one business. b. Wall signs and monument signs shall be architecturally designed to be compatible with the development. Monument signs shall be placed entirely on the subject property and shall not overhang into private or public property. A combination of monument and wall signs may be used; however, only a maximum of 3 signs may be used to identify any one business. b. Wall signs are limited to business identification only. Monument signs may contain up to three identifications per side; either the theme name of the center and two tenants or three tenants, The design (color, material. style) of all monument signs shall be consistent and compatible to the design of the center. Monument signs facing different streets need not contain identical information. Additionally, a two-sided sign need not contain the same copy. A center is one in which businesses and structures are designed in an integrated and interrelated development. Such design is independent of the number of structures, lots, or parcels making up the center. All shopping centers shall develop a coordinated sign program for all tenants and uses. This includes size, color, sign type, and location. Limited variation is permitted, such as color, as long as the remaining components of the program remain the same. 14.20.100 Permitted Signs - Commercial and Office Zones - The following signs may be permitted in the commercial and office zones subject to the provisions listed: CLASS Business identification (businesses within shopping centers) (Continued). Business identification (multiple professional tenants more than three). The number and placement of wall and directory signs shall be subject to review by the City Planner. SIGN TYPE MAXIMUM NUMBER MAXIMUM SIGN AREA MAXIMUM HEIGHT or Monument Two per street frontage, 24 square feet. Up to 6 feet. minimum 300 feet apart. or Monument One per street frontage of 48 square feet. 500 feet or more. and Business To be determined through D i r e c t o r y approval by the City (Monument) Planner. Signs may be placed to form a single structure or kiosk. and Project I,D. Monuments Wall and Monument and Business Directory One per street frontage, not to exceed 2 per center. Up to 8 feet. 15 square feet. Up to 6 feet. 24 square feet Up to 6 feet. To be determined by the 10% of the face of the City Planner based on each structure where sign is to be individual buildingdesign. placed, not to exceed 50 square feet. One per street, maximum 24 square feet. of two. 12 square feet. To be determined by the City Planner based on each individual building design. Not to project above the roof. Up to 8 feet. Up to 8 feet. REMARKS Monument signs shall identify major anchor tenants and provide suffident area to identify minor tenants as determined by the property owner. An 8-inch minimum letter height is recommended. Address of center required, but not counted as part of the monument sign area, The business directory signs are intended to provide direction and identification to the smaller individual shop tenants. All such signs shall maintain a minimum 60-foot setback from the street (as measured from the face of curb). c Project I.D, signs are limited to only identifying the theme name and/or graphic logo of the center. Project I.D. signs shall be located at a major intersection or project entry. Project I.D. signs shall be pad of an architectural theme wall (not freestanding sign). A pair of project I.D. signs flanking a project entry shall count as one sign, A conceptual sign program for each building shall be required at the time of design review, The City Planner shall review all office sign programs through the permit procedure to determined that it is within the criteria herein set forth and meets the intent of this Ordinance. Monument signs shall be limited to identifying the name of the professional complex. Business directory signs may be placed throughout the site as needed at entrances and shall be limited to listing the tenants name and suite number 14.20.100 Permitted Signs - Commercial and Office Zones - The following signs may be permitted in the commercial and office zones subject to the provisions listed: CLASS 3. Business identification (multiple professional tenants more than three), The number and placement of wall and directory signs shall be subject to review by the City Planner (continued). 4. a. Service Station Identification and Pricing b. Special Service Signs c. Special Advertisement 5. Pedestrian Traffic Signs 6. Regional Shopping Center 7. Movie Theaters SIGN TYPE MAXIMUM NUMBER MAXIMUM SIGN AREA MAXIMUM HEIGHT REMARKS and Site One per vehicular entrance. 12 square feet. Up to 8 feet. a. Directory (monument) b. To direct visitors and emergency vehicles to buildings. Sign shall be conveniently located and shall not be located within the entry throat in a manner which could block access. c. Illuminated for legibility 24 hours a day. Sign shall locate buildings, driveways, and address of each building. Fire hydrant or Knox box locations may also be shown as required by the fire district. Wall One per street frontage, 10% of building face not to Not above roof line or 20 maximum two. exceed 150 square feet. feet. and Monument One per street frontage, not 36 square feet. Up to 8 feet. to exceed a total of two per station. Wall or Ground One for each pump island, 2 square feet. not to exceed a total of four per station. If mounted on a wall or pole of the canopy, it shall be no higher than 8 feet. Ground signs shall not exceed 6 feet in height. Window or Two per station. 6 square feet. A ground sign shall not Ground exceed 6 feet in height, a window sign shall not exceed 6 feet in height. Wall, Window, or One per business. 6squarefeet. Not to exceed 12 feet Canopy above finished grade. e. Copy shall be a minimum of 1-inch in heigh and legible from 20 feet. a. A combination of monument and wall may be used, but not more than a total of 3 signs. The monument sign shall be designed to include the identification of the station and gasoline prices. No other price signs are allowed. Special service si~lns shall be Imited to such items as self serve, full serve, air, water. cashier. and shall be nonilluminated. Special advertisement shall be limited to advertising special sales or services, Such sign shall contain only the identification of the business for pedestrian traffic. Upon development of a "regional shopping center," a conceptual sign program shall be developed and approved by the Planning Commission with the overall approval of the project. Final details of the signs shall be submitted to the City Planner in accordance with the sign permit procedures. The City Planner shall review for consistency with approved conceptual program. Upon development of a "movie theater," a conceptual sign program shall be developed and approved by the Planning Commission with the overall approval of the project. Final details of the signs shall be submitted to the City Planner in accordance with the sign permit procedures. The City Planner shall review for consistency with approved conceptual program. o