Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994/07/20 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. July 20, 1994 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tern Willisrn J. Alexander, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane Willisrn s, Councilmember Jack Lnm, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adsms, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. PAGE 1. Roll Call: Buquet A. CALl TO ORDER , Alexander ,Stout VVilliams , and Gutierrez B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSFNT CALFNDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: June 1, 1994 (Stout) June 16, 1994 July 6, 1994 e Approval of Warrants. Register Nos. 6/29/94 (FY 93/94), 6/29/94 (FY 94/95), 7/6/94 (FY 93/94). 7/6/94 (FY 94/95); and Payroll ending 6/16/94 for the total amount of $2.100.247.55. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July30. 1994. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General for Town & Country Liquor. Issa and Mtanos Hawara, 12962-64 Foothill Boulevard. l0 City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 5. Approval to adopt Annual Statement of Investment Policy. Approval to adopt Compensation Resolution for Fiscal Year 1994/95. RESOLUTION NO. 94-144 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 94-132 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between William J. Beard Jr. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (Budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-145 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM WILUAM J. BEARD JR. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between William McKinley Walton Jr. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (Budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-146 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM WILLIAM MCKINLEY WALTON JR. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Approval to execute Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) Memorandum of Understanding (CO 94-052) for Fiscal Year 1994/95. PAGE 18 21 22 38 39 40 41 42 City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 10. Approval to authorize the execution of Professional Service Agreement with RMA Group (CO 944:]53)for Soils Testing of Public Works Design and Construction Projects at Various Locations City Wide, for Fiscal Year 1994/95. to be funded from the appropriate Capital Improvement Project Accounts at the specified rates. 11. Approval to authorize the execution of Professional Services Agreements with Associated Engineers (CO 944354 ) and Wagner Pacific (CO 94-055) for Surveying of Public Works Design and Construction Projects at Various Locations City Wide, for Fiscal Year 1994/95, to be funded from the appropriate Capital Improvement Project Accounts at the specified rates. 12. Approval to award and authorization to execute Contract (CO 94- 056) for Resurfacing of Traffic Deck/Parking Structure Improvement Project, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, to Ladner Coatings for the amount of S 174,312.00 (S 158 ~xS.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded with RDA Funds Account No. 17-150[X3. 13. Approval to execute Amendment No. 6 (CO 92-064) to the Lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. which describes the terms and responsibilities of each party for the left field scoreboard. 14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 93-17, located at the northwest corner Of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church. RESOLUTION NO. 94-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 93-17 RESOLUTION NO. 94-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 6 FOR CUP 93-17 PAGE 3 44 45: 46 48 50 51 52 City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 15. Appro~/al to accept the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Project, From Civic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 93-031, as complete, Release the Bonds and Authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion." RESOLUTION NO. 94-149 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT FROM CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 93- 031, AND AUTHORIZING THE FLUNG OF A NOT1CE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 16. Approval to accept the Chaffey-Garcia Bam Construction Project, Contract No. 93-071, as complete. Release Bonds, and authorize the City Manager to file a 'Notice of Completion.' RESOLUTION NO. 94-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE CHAFFEY-GARCIA BARN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CO 93-071, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLERON FOR THE WORK PAGE 4 55 56 57 59 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - Review of a Development Agreement for the Redevelopmerit of 380 acres of land, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad. and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01,1::)4, 07, and 08; 210081- 22 and 23; 210-082-02, I l, 17, 37.38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 ORDINANCE NO. 526 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 94-01, FOR SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 209-272-01, []4, 07, AND 1:]8; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PI AN AMENDMENT 94431 - WESTERN lAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25- acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east, and the related text and graphic changes - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. ORDINANCE NO. 527 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94- 01, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE WEST, CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH. AND ELM AVENUE ON THE EAST AND AMENDING VARIOUS TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63 PAGE 6O 98 F. ADVFRTISFD PUBLIC HFARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94432 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request for various streamlining amendments to the Development/Design Review procedures and Land Use regulations. 117 City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 PAGE 6 CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PI AN AMENDMENT 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Types, Land Use Type Definitions, and the permitted and conditionally permitted uses of various subareas. CONSIDERATION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA - A request to amend the Land Use Regulations for Subarea 1, 2, 3, and 4 regarding permitted and condit,!onally perm~ed uses. CONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PI AN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Provisions regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses for Office and Commercial Districts. CONSIDERATION QF ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Neighborhood Commercial District. CONSIDERATION OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PI AN AMENDMENT 94- 01 - CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PI AN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 o CITY QF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the time extension provisions. ORDINANCE NO. 528 (first reading) 142 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 94-02, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO STREAMLINE THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS, AND MODIFYING THE LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 ORDINANCE NO. 529 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03, AMENDING THE LAND USE TYPES. LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS, AND THE LAND USES WITHIN VARIOUS SUBAREA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 94-t51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 530 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 53 1 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CffY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94- 01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 532 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CrFY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENOING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF PAGE 7 160 173 180 187 City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 ORDINANCE NO. 533 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE crrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94- 02, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 534 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHQ CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 16, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF PAGE 195 204 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal requirements. The Chair will open public testimony. publication or posting the meeting to receive No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGFR'S STAFF RFPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FREEWAY TO FREEWAY INTERCHANGE BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND ROUTE 30 (Oral Report) RESOLUTION NO. 94-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CALTRANS TQ PURCHASE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION QF A FREEWAY TQ FREEWAY INTERCHANGE BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND ROUTE 208 City Council Agenda July 20, 1994 PAGE 9 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE REPORT ON CITY SEAL INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON YOUTH PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CITY 209 211 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MFFTING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBIIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS: (1) PROPERTY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8, WITH AMPAC, LOCATED AT 12167 ARROW ROUTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. (2) EXISTING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 RE CASE NUMBER RCV 056436, AMPAC VS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 14, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 1, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CAt,I, TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 1, 1994, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Charles J. Buquet II. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Pro Tem Charles J. Buquet II. Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer; Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer;, Deborah Clark, Library Manager, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. Absent was: Mayor Dennis L. Smut. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B 1. Presentation of Proclamations to Gregory White Jr., Eric Wagner and Anita Arias for their assistance to the D.A.R.E. Program and for the example they set to children throughout the City. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet presented the proclamations to the students. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC CI. Marcus Solomon, Rancho Cucamonga and attending school in Berkeley, thanked the Council for allowing skateboarders to express themselves by allowing contests to be held in the City. He stated they encountered no problems with the first one, and a second one was scheduled for October. He stated a group of skateboarders were going to volunteer for graffiti removal to give something back to the community. He passed out an article to the Council regarding skateboarding and recent legislation passed by the City of Berkeley, and spoke about local skateboarders that have been invited to participate in the International Gcxxiwill Games in Russia that would need sponsorship in order to attend. City Council MinUtes June 1, 1994 Page 2 C2. Shelby Whaley, London Avenue, stated that in regards to the recent newsletters sent out about the Landscape Maintenance District public hearings, he did not see why they had to be sent f'trst class mail, and felt that the City could save money by sending them bulk rate. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated that due to the timeliness of the material, sending it fn'st class will guarantee its delivery, plus the City will receive back letters that were undeliverable so that they can correct their records. C3. Douglas Pure, 7970 Layton, reminded the Council that an election would be held on June 7 and that everyone should vote. He stated the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga have not forgotten the utility tax that is on their bills, and the attempt made to put transitional housing for the homeless in their residential neighborhood, and urged the citizens to support James Penman in the upcoming election. C4. Denise Corbitt, Rancho Cucamonga and a student at Cal Poly Pomona, spoke about her research project developing a restaurant guide for Route 66, and stated that while working on this she discovered how little she knew about the history of Rancho Cucamonga, and felt that others might not either. She felt that history was important to a community and urged the Council to keep that in mind when developing Rancho Cucamonga. C5. Bob Lundy, Rancho Cucamonga Visitors Bureau, felt the restaurant guide that Denise Corbitt had developed would help people and made business sense. He referred to the handouts given to the Council and spoke about what made up a visitor's bureau. He stated the Council had been invited to be on the board of directors and wanted to know ff they would be taking part in the Bureau. He asked that this be agendized for the next meeting. C6. Robert Serna, 7656 Layton, spoke about an incident involving his pit bull which had gotten loose when they were not at home, and how the Animal Control and Police Departments handled the incident, which resulted in the death of the dog. He felt that other measures should have been tried when they were trying to catch the dog because he did not feel that his dog was vicious. He stated he had tried to file a complaint with the Police Department and was told that he could not do so. He felt the Police Department had not been cooperative when he tried to obtain information regarding the incident and was owed an apology, and that the Animal Control Department should handle situations like this in a manner that did not require killing the animal. Mayor Pro Tern Buquet stated he was sorry to hear of Mr. Serna's loss and asked Capt. Zeiner to provide information on what they have found out so far in their investigations. Capt. Zeiner, Police Department, stated the original call received at 9:30 a.m. indicated there was a pit bull that was growling and snapping at people so they had to be cautious when responding. He stated several officers were involved for an hour and a half in trying to contain the dog, and their first goal was public safety. He referred to the incident that occurred a couple of years ago where another family's pets got loose, and though they had given no prior indication that they might be vicious, they attacked a grandmother and two children in one of the parks and practically killed them. He stated they have to keep things like that in mind when responding to a call like this, and when they arrived at the residence, there were indications that the dog had gotten loose before and the fence had been temporarily patched. He stated the dog was not shot as a method of apprehension, it was only after the dog ran towards an officer. He stated he would be happy to meet with Mr. Serna and advise how he could file a citizen's complaint if he felt he has been wronged, and stated he was extremely sorry that they had to shoot an animal, but felt before blame was placed on others for things that happen, people as animal lovers and owners should feel responsible enough that they lake proper care of their animals and not allow them to roam free so these types of incidents do not City CouncilMinutes June 1, 1994 Page 3 D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: April 20, 1994 May 4, 1994 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 5/11/94 and 5/18/94; and Payroll ending 5/5/94 and 5/19/94 for the total amount of $1,366,362.79. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Sav-on Drugs, Lucky Stores Incorporated Delaware, 11428 Kenyon Way. D4. Approval of a Resolution approving Alternate Members for the Public Representatives of the Solid Waste Advisory Task Force. RESOLUTION NO. 94-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ALTERNATE MEMBERS FOR THE PUBLIC REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK FORCE D5. Approval of Landmark Designation 94-01 - St. Clare of Assisi - An application to designate the Ernst Mueller House, located at 6563 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, as an Historic Landmark - APN: 227-071-17. RESOLUTION NO. 94-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 94-01, THEREBY DESIGNATING THE ERNST MUELLER HOUSE, LOCATED AT 6563 EAST AVENUE, AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-071-17 D6. Approval to declare all monies remaining in the Improvement Fund for Assessment District No. 89-1 (MilHken, south of Arrow) as Surplus. RESOLUTION NO. 94-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING DECLARATION REGARDING SURPLUS IN IMPROVEMENT FUND D7. Approval of a resolution specifying conditions for the prepayment of special taxes within Community Facilities District 88-2. RESOLUTION NO. 94-103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SPECIFYING CONDITIONS FOR THE PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT City Council Minutes June 1, 1994 Page 4 D8. Approval to release cash deposit and a Real Property Improvement Contract and Agreement for 8762 Vinmar Street, located south of 9th Street, east of Grove Avenue, submitted by Vincent Martinez. RESOLUTION NO. 94-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A CASH DEPOSIT AND A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT FROM 8762 VINMAR STREET D9. Approval to execute a Joint Use Agreement (CO 94-039) with Rancho Cucamonga High School for Graduation Ceremonies at the Adult Sports Complex on June 16, 1994, and for City use of Rancho Cucamonga High School Gymnasium for Youth Basketball Program. D10. Approval and authorization to execute a Common Use Agreement (CO 94-040) with San Bernardino County Flood Control District for Joint Use of Flood Control District Land at the Rochester Avenue East Side Parkway from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue. Dll. Approv~d to oxoeuto an Agroomont (CO 94 041) botwoon tho City of Raneho Cueamonga and C~noral Dynamics Corporation for right of ontry for construction slopo grading and oonsuuc,~on of drainago facilities for tho City of Ranoho Cuearnongtt's Motrolink gtation, Bhnso I. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA. D12. Approval to execute an Agreement (CO 94-042) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Catellus Development Corporation for right-of-entry for grading and storm drain construction for the construction of the Milliken Avenue Project from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard. D13. Approval to award and authorization for execution of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 94-043) to L.D. King for construction survey for the Milliken Avenue Extension Improvement Project, located between Arrow Highway and Foothill Boulevard for the amount of $38,900.00, to be funded from Measure I (Arterial) Account No. 32-4637-9328. D14. Approval to award and authorization to execute a contract (CO 94-044) for the Milliken Avenue Extension, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard, and the Arrow Route Storm Drain Improvement Project to Riverside Construction for the amount of $1,551,867.90 ($,410,789.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from San Bernardino County Measure I (Arterial) Account No. 32-4637-9328 and S.B. 140 Account No. 35-4637-9328. D15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13728, located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Sapphire Street. Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond Storm Drain $ 7,400.00 Su'eets 71,300.00 D16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 11472, located on the south side of 19th Street east of Hermosa Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit $ 1,100.00 D17. Approval to release a portion of funds deposited under Contract CO 90-139 for payment of Southern Pacific Railway Improvements at the Rochester Crossing, to the William Lyon Company. City Council Minutes June 1, 1994 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 94-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE RELEASE OF A PORTION OF FUNDS DEPOSITED BY THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY FOR PAYMENT OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ROCHESTER CROSSING D18. Approval to accept the Ninth Street Waterline Improvement Project, located from Vinmar to Sierra Madre Avenues, CO 94-003, as complete, retain Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $22,057.40 RESOLUTION NO. 94-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NINTH STREET WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED FROM VINMAR TO SIERRA MADRE AVENUES, CONTRACT NO. CO 94-003, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION D19. Approval to accept the Sapphire Street Storm Drain and Street Improvement, Banyan Street to Moon Court; Carnelian Street Access Ramps, Base Line Road to Nineteenth Street; and Base Line Road Improvements, east of Victoria Park Lane, CO 94-010, as complete, retain Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the f'mal contract amount of $72,200.25. RESOLUTION NO. 94-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SAPPHIRE STREET STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENT, BANYAN STREET TO MOON COURT; CARNELIAN STREET ACCESS RAMPS, BASE LINE ROAD TO NINETEENTH STREET; AND BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, EAST OF VICTORIA PARK LANE, CONTRACT NO. CO 94- 010, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve the staff recommendations contained in the staff reports of the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item D11. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). No items were submitted. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES City Council Minutes June 1, 1994 Page 6 F. ADVERTISED PUBI,IC HEARINGS ITEMS FI, F2 AND F3 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME. F1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCI:. DISTRICT NOS. 1.2. 3.4.5. 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 (No Increase of Assessment Rate is Proposed) Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the refund for LMD 7 bad been budgeted. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes, since many of the delinquencies had been paid they had $200,000.00 which would be rebated to the residents in approximately 30-45 days. Councilmember Williams asked how much would that be for each residence. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated there were 1,000 residences in that District, so that would be a $250.00 rebate for each unit. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about the factors tbat might increase the rates. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated Cucamonga County Water District has informed them that there will be a 5-1/2% rate increase for the upcoming year, and all indications point to annual increases, so they will need to address that as time goes along. Councilmember Alexander stated he has received calls about replacement problems with the landscaping in LMD 2, and asked if there were plans to bring that area up to standard. Joe O'Nell, City Engineer, stated there are numerous areas where they have added plants, and he would provide a report to the Council on that. He stated if anyone from the public had questions, they could contact himself or Cindy HackeR. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet opened the meeting for public. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 94-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 94-108. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). City CouncilMinutes June 1, 1994 Page 7 F2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND RESOLUTION FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1.2. 3A. 3B. 4. 5. 6. 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 (No Increase of Assessment Rate is Proposed) See Item F1 for discussion. RESOLUTION NO. 94-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 94-109. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). F3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR THE. LEVY OF THF. ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 eqo Increase of Assessment Rate is Proposed) See Item F1 for discussion. RESOLUTION NO. 94-1 I0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS NO. 85-PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 94-110. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). F4. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest comer of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. Staff report presented by Nancy Fong, Senior Planner. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: John Mannerino, 9333 Base Line Road, representing Mr. Pellegrino, passed out a leuer from the property manager to the Council to show that compliance with the conditions has not been as easy as might have been expected. He stated he did not understand why they were back before the Council because Mr. Pellegrino has been trying to comply with the restrictions placed by the Council. He stated he was not aware of any complaints that have come in. He agreed that they were unable to comply in one week but explained the difficulties encountered in trying to coordinate with all the different agencies involved. He also stated there was a question as to the requirement for security, and felt the way it was written was City Council Minutes June 1, 1994 Page 8 ambiguous and that they were in compliance with that requirement as they had interpreted it. He showed photographs that supported their compliance. He also felt that employees and patrons of other establishments in the shopping center were creating some of the problems attributed to Sam's Place, and that they had no control over them. He felt if staff were to go out and continuously monitor this establishment they could find violations that he felt were punitive in nature, but he did not feel that was the point of the conditions when they were placed upon the bar. He thought if Mr. Pellegrino evidenced a good faith effort to reduce the impact of his establishment on the neighborhood he could stay open until midnight and that was what was occurring. Sam Pellegrino, Sam's Place, felt the Council has placed more emphasis on his establishment than on others in the City and that the City did not go after other bars that are in the same situation. He stated he has lost 43% of his business in the last four weeks due to the conditions placed upon him. He also felt the article in the Daily Bulletin had an adverse impact on his ability to fred another location to open his bar at Mayor Pro Tem Buquet asked if he was closing his establishment at midnighL Sam Pellegrino, Sam's Place, stated yes. The only people in the bar after midnight were staff people and customers who might be finishing their last drinks. Eric Snedaker, 7534 Plymouth Way, believed the Council has taken an aggressive stance on undesirable establishments, and was not going to argue about that position, but asked them to fully consider Sam's situation and that they take into account the opinions of the residents as a whole and not just a few concerned parties. He thought that most residents in this area will be drowned out by the sound of freeway traffic in a few years, more than from his bar. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Alexander felt they might have overreacted. He did not know why they were not looking at the intent instead of the letter of the law. He stated he was not aware of any complaints, and felt if the officers occasionally check to see that he is still trying to comply to the conditions set by the Council, he felt that was adequate. He added the establishment has agreed to close or relocate by September and was not in support of the resolution. Councilmember Willjams concurred with Councilmember Alexander. She asked if the chain appeared to be a problem with the property manager and owner, was there another way they could resolve that issue. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the chain along the wall was not required, and was a misinterpretation by the applicant and could be removed. He stated if the Council wanted to remove the other chain and leave the "No Parking" signs posted, they could go with that. He stated in response to the condition for a security guard at 6:00 p.m., the Council could set whatever requirements they deemed appropriate and staff would follow their guidelines. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if they needed to have security that early. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the reason for a security guard provision is because it is objective, because other requirements, such as the owner will not allow any disturbance, is very subjective and these amorphous conditions are very difficult to monitor for compliance. He stated it was probably for that reason they set a specific time for security. He stated he would not suggest they go back to some amorphous condition, but it was the Council's decision. City CouncilMinutes June 1, 1994 Page 9 Councilmember Alexander stated they might want to consider changing the time so security requirements would start at sundown. Councilmember Gutierrez wanted to be sure they were being consistent and did not feel they were doing thaL He appreciated staffs diligence on the matter but might feel differently if there had been complaints from the neighborhood. He felt they could continue until September, and that providing security once it was dark would be all right with him. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet felt the owner might have drawn this attention upon himself, but agreed that seven days might not have been enough time for full compliance. He stated he had heard there was some after hour activity, but he would take the word of the applicant that it was not occurring. He stated he appreciated staff monitoring the situation, and did not feel they were at fault for bringing this back to the Council because they had been directed to do so if Mr. Pellegrino was not in full compliance, though after seeing the photographs it appears Mr. Pellegrino is 99% in compliance. He stated they could look at a compromise on the time for security to start, maybe around 7:00 or 7:30 p.m. John Mannerino felt they should tailor the condition for security to the use of the bar. He stated they really have no business until around 9:00 p.m., and that on Monday and Tuesday there is almost no business at all. He stated the busiest times are Thursday through Saturday after 9:00 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem asked Brad Buller to work with Mr. Mannerino in defining what was required for security that would be objective. Brad Buller, City Planner, felt they could do that. RESOLUTION NO. 94-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78- 03 FOR THE OPERATION OF A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SLIPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH CONSIDERATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial DisUict, located at the northwest comer of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. RESOLUTION NO. 94-112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 91-02 FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT HE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60 ACTION: Council directed staff to work with the applicant to smooth out any final requirements and allow them to operate until the expiration of the lease. City Council Minutes June 1, 1994 Page 10 F5. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93-02A - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to change the land use map from Industrial Park and General Industrial to Mixed Use and Open Space and other related amendments in conjunction with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan for 380 acres of land generally located north of 4th Street and west of Milliken Avenue - APN: 209- 272-01, 04, 07 and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-03, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Council was: Jeff Kudlack, General Dynamics, 10900 E. 4th Street, thanked staff for the time and effort they have put in to move this project forward to this point, and were appreciative for the support they received from the Planning Commission. He felt their project focused on the three "R's", revitalize, re-evaluate and reposition, and explained how this project covered all three areas. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 94-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 93- 02A, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADD A NEW LAND USE CATEGORY OF "MIXED USE," TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TO MIXED USE AND OPEN SPACE, AND OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A.T.S.F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AVENUE AND UTICA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SLIPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272- 01, 04, 07, 08; 210-081-22, 23; 210-082-02, I1, 17, 37 THROUGH 39; AND 210-361- 01 THROUGH 26 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to adopt Resolution No. 94-113. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A proposed amendment to create a new Subarea 18, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Mi!liken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, and other related amendments to provide consistency with the Subarea 18 Specific Plan - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082- 02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 524. City CouncilMinutes June 1, 1994 Page 11 ORDINANCE NO. 524 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 93-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH A SUBAREA 18, AND OTHER RELATED AMENDMENTS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, FOR 380 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY 4TH STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE, ON THE NORTH BY THE A.T. & S.F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AND UTICA AVENUES, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210- 082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Willjams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 524 for June 15, 1994. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). F6. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A plan for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, commercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18- hole golf course, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue. Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 525. ORDINANCE NO. 525 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01, THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 525 for Jane 15, 1994. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - GENERAL DYNAMICS - A public hearing on a Final EIR for the General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga Subarea Specific Plan 93-01, General Plan Amendment 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, and Tentative Parcel Map 14647 for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land that would include recreational, commercial, and retail facilities surrounding an 18- hole golf course, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railread, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue. City CouncilMinUtes June 1,1994 Page 12 RESOLUTION NO. 94-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to adopt Resolution No. 94-114. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). G. PUBI,IC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS HI. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING SUPPORT FOR THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAl- SOCIETY AND THEIR APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE ADA COOPER HISTORIC PRESERVATION ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Pro Tern Buquet opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, public comments were closecL RESOLUTION NO. 94-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING SUPPORT FOR THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AND THEIR APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE ADA COOPER HISTORIC PRESERVATION ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND MOTION: Moved by Willjams, seconded by Alexander to adopt Resolution No. 94-115. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). H2. CONSIDERATION TO RELEASE MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12902. LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD (NORDIC DEVELOPMENT~ Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 31,000.00 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Willjams to approve staffs recommendation contained in the staff report. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). City Council Minutes June 1, 1994 Page 13 H3. STATUS REPORT ON YOUTH ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD'S PROGRESS Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, who stated Cynthia Fusie was present to give an update. Cynthia Fusie, Probation Department, presented information on how the volunteers were being trained and organized, and stated they should be ready to start operations in June. Councilmember Gutierrez asked how many people were on a panel. Cynthia Fusie, Probation Department, stated there were five people per panel, and that they rotate monthly. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet asked if they cotrid have an update report in 90 days. Councilmember Gutierrez asked how many kids in Rancho Cucamonga would be impacted, and if there were any other cities in this area that were using this program. Cynthia Fusie, Probation Department, stated the Juvenile Officer at the Rancho Cucamonga Substation receives about 82 applications per month, but they are not all first time offenders and this was a first time offender program. She stated initially they would be dealing with about 10 cases per month until the paneis become more familiar with the process. She stated the City of Hesperia has had this program for almost three years. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if they kept any statistics on if people who go through this program commit other crimes afterwards to gauge how effective this program is. Cynthia Fusie, Probation Department, stated they have not kept official statistics in the past but they are starting to do so now. Councilmember Gutierrez suggested that the Council might want to send a letter to each person who volunteered for the program, even if they were unable to be on a panel to thank them for their participation and their efforts on behalf of the community. ACTION: Update report to come back in 90 days. H4. COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION TO RECRUIT LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES Staff report presented by Deborah Clark, Library Manager. Mayor Pro Tern Buquet stated he understood that the Council Subcommittee has already met on this matter and thought they should see what the Subeommittee's recommendation was. Jack Lain, City Manager, stated they have moved ahead with the advertising but would like direction from the Council on how they would like to select the finalists. Councilmember Williams stated the Subcommittee's initial response was if the Council approved, they would handle it in the same way as they have in the past, where the Subcommittee narrows the applicants down to a short list for the Council to review, but with five positions open a short list might be 15-20 applicants. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet stated he would like the Subcommittee to screen the applicants down to 10 maximum. City Council Minutes June 1, 1994 Page 14 Councilmember Gutierrez stated he wanted to be sure that the Council did get a chance to vote on the fmalists. Councilmember Williams stated that would be the process followed. ACTION: The Council directed staff to move forward with the application and interview process. I. COUNCIl, BUSINESS I1. UPDATE ON MARKS CABLEVISION ISSUES Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, who introduced Bill Marks Sr., President of Marks Cablevision. Bill Marks, Marks Cablevision, went over handouts he had given to the Council. He presented background information on how long they have been in the cable industry as well as their time in Rancho Cucamonga and how they are committed to the community. He stated they have invested $50 million already in the system, and are spending $800 thousand a month in upgrades, which included such items as fiber optics, 61 channel availability, and state-of-the an addressable converter boxes. He continued to explain the problems they have encountered in convening from three systems to one, and the steps they have taken to correct those problems. He stated they would have the finest cable system in the area when they were finished. He stated they have increased their staff and employ local residents. He presented information on how they could work in conjunction with the City by putting specific information on a certain grid for emergency notices which would be beneficial for the community. and how they would be a total telecommunications company. Sean Hogue, Director of Development for Marks Cablevision, spoke about how they have been working on improving communications with the City. He stated Marks has always been a very community oriented company, and stated some of the ways they support the community are by providing service free to the different schools, working with Chaffey College, working with the City on a graffiti removal project, hiring local employees, and supporting Quakes baseball. He covered the critical path items that will be occurring in the next three months, such as the new converter boxes, construction schedules, their new offices in Terra Vista, the fiber optic interconnect, etc. Councilmember Williams stated she liked the idea of having an update every three months. ACTION: Report received and filed, with an update to come hack in three months. I2. DISCUSSION OF FORMAT FOR JUNE 8. 1994 ROUTE 30 MEETING (Oral Discussion) Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated staff has met with members of the PAC for Route 30 and they arrived at an agreeable format that would allow them to be informed by the representatives of SANBAG and Caltrans as to the official status and alternative designs that have been prepared by the project proponents, and then the City would facilitate a question and answer period with those representatives which would allow greater understanding of the project. He felt they would have a cooperative and functional meeting in which people will gain a greater understanding of what they are trying to accomplish. He added that the City of Upland recently conducted a meeting that was initiated by the Mayor Nolan of Upland in order to gather further information from SANBAG and Caltrans as to the funding and sequencing of construction, and at that meeting Calltans and SANBAG discussed the way in which the funding would be used. Mayor Nolan had some concerns, and at today's SANBAG Board meeting he expressed those concerns, and the Board asked the Major Projects Task Force to look at alternatives City Council Minutes June I, 1994 Page 15 to fund the western portion of the freeway as a priority. He stated the Council had been given a copy of a letter sent to Mayor Nolan clarifying the Route 30 Forum and its purpose. He introduced Gary Moon, the Project Manager from SANBAG for the Route 30 Freeway. Gary Moon, SANBAG, stated at the last public meeting there was an estimated attendance of 1100-1200 people which far outreached their expectations. He stated they did not plan for a question and answer period but they did put out comment cards for people to fill ouL Those cards are being categorized and the answers will be presented at the June 8th meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet asked if they will have a question and answer period at the next meeting at Alta Loma High School. Gary Moon, SANBAG, stated the meeting will be in the auditorium, which is fixed seating and has a limited number of seats available. He stated they are concerned that if the same amount of residents come to the meeting they might have a problem with the capacity. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet felt the kind of turn out they have been having would indicate that they need to hold a number of meetings to accommodate everyone. Councilmember Willjams wanted to be sure that they were prepared with the most current information and ample hand-outs for the meeting. Gary Moon, SANBAG, stated they were prepared for a very large crowd again. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what would be the format they would be following. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated Caltrans and SANBAG would make a presentation and discuss the alternative options, then there would be an opportunity for people to ask questions of the representatives. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what was the Council's role in these meetings because this question arose after the last meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet stated some of the confusion centers around the fact that this is not a City project, it is being handled at the state and federal levels. He stated Rancho Cucamonga has set high design standards for this area, and he did not feel they should let down those standards just because it was someone else's project. He felt it was important for people who attend the meetings to understand that the City's role is one of advocacy, that they have been involved for many years in this issue, not just now when it was getting close to construction. He felt they needed to keep having these meetings so the other agencies involved can understand the concerns of the community and their standards. He felt the Council should be introduced but felt their role should only be one of advocacy, and not where they are put in the position of being proponents of the project. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the final design will be approved by the City leaders. Mayor Pro Tern Buquet stated the City has to enter into a development agreement relative to the freeway, and there will have some say in the matter. Councilmember Gutierrez felt the Council should adjourn to the meeting at the high school. City Council Minutes June 1, 1994 Page 16 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated if they do adjourn, then it will be considered a Council meeting rather than a meeting by the other agencies. He stated they could do so at Council's direction. The Council discussed with the City Attorney the impacts of the Brown Act if they were to attend the meeting without calling a Council meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet asked Gary Moon if the Council were to adjourn to this meeting, would that create a conflict with the Callxans and SANBAG representatives. Gary Moon, SANBAG, stated Caltrans was unwilling to pafijcipate fully and directly in this meeting given the fact that it is a fixed arrangement with a potential question and answer section. He stated they would make themselves available but did not want to participate in any type of presentation, so he did not feel that any decision the Council made would affect their decision. He stated SANBAG would have no problem with the Council's plan. He explained how SANBAG and Caltrans had conducted the hearings on the Environmental Document. One was not successful and there was a lot of grandstanding. The second one was held differently and used the comment cards, and since that seemed to work well for them, they have been trying to format all their meetings like that. He stated the difference was that they held the second meeting over a period of nine to ten hours, so it did not create a crush of people. Mayor Pro Tem Buquet opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the Council was: Frank Munoz, 6621 Kern, appreciated the time the Council was spending on this issue. He concurred that the Council should be at the June 8th meeting in an official capacity. It was also his understanding that SANBAG would have updated displays showing the three proposed options. He also thought there should be a question and answer period. There being no further response, the public comments section was closed. ACTION: Report received and filed. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Alexander asked for an item to consider nominating a Councilmember to the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Visitors Bureau (Route 66). KI. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBIJC John Van Doren, 11186 Corsica, stated he was pleased by the actions the Council have taken to make Rancho Cucamonga one of the safest cities in the nation, and hoped they continued the good work. City CouncilMinutes June 1, 1994 Page 17 !,. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: 'Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to recess to Executive Session to discuss Property per Government Cede Section 37350, located on the southeast corner of Hellman and Wilson Avenue (5759 Hellman Avenue), with Dorothy and Wesley West; Rick Gomez and Larry Henderson negotiators; concerning price and terms of payment, and Labor Negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6 to give Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, direction in regards to the meet and confer process with all City employee groups; and Executive Session to adjourn to the Route 30 public meeting being held on June 8, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. in the Alia Loma High School Auditorium. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). The meeting adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: June 16, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting A. CAI,!, TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Thursday, June 16, 1994, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:02 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Boardmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II (arrived at 6:08 p.m.), Rex Gutierrez (axrived at 6:09 p.m.), Diane Williams, and President Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer;, Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer; Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director;, Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Rose Colurn, Accountant; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Bob Corcoran, Deputy Chief Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Bob Valenti, Accountant Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ADVERTISED PUBI.IC HEARINGS 1. ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIII-B APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT Staff report by Jack Lain, City Manager Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 94-130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ~ CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 94-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIII-B OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 Counciimember Buquet arrived at 6:08 p.m. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 94-130 and or-131. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Gutierrez absent). Councilmember Gutierrez arrived at 6:09 p.m. City Council Minutes June 16, 1994 Page 2 No communication was made from the public. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBI,IC ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Willjams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:11 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * July 6, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CAI,I, TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 6, 1994, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager;, Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner, Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lt. Joe Henry, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS No announcements or presentations were made. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBIJC No communications were made from the public. D. CONSENT CAI,ENDAR DI. Approval of Minutes: May26,1994 (Gu~enez absent) June 8,1994 June 9,1994 D2. Approval ofWarrants, Regis~rNos. 6/8/94,6/15/94and 6/22/94, and Payrollending 6/2/94, forthetotal amount of $2,700,150.15. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 2 D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for "21" Off-Sale General for Ramona Market, Deeb I. Deeb, 9950 West Foothill Boulevard, Units A and B. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER BUQUET. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for "41" On Sale Beer & Wine (Public Eating Place) for Rocky's N.Y. Pizzeria, Luis and Maria G. Orihuela, 9615 Foothill Boulevard. D5. Approval to extend Comcast Cable T.V. Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91-012Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D6. Approval to adopt Compensation Resolution for Fiscal Year 1994/95 RESOLUTION NO. 94-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-142 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 D7. Approval to amend Resolution No. 93-062 providing for charges for parking at the Rancho Cucamonga Sports Complex. RESOLUTION NO. 94-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-062 AND ESTABLISHING A NEW PARKING FEE SCHEDULE FOR PARKING AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPORTS COMPLEX DURING EVENTS FOR WHICH ADMISSION IS CHARGED D8. Approval to accept the County Library Site from the County of San Bernardino, located at 9 191 Base Line Road - APN: 208-011-58. RESOLUTION NO. 94-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE LIBRARY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9191 BASE LINE ROAD, APN 208-011-58, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN SAID DEED City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 3 D9. Approval to maintain levy for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 at current levels with no increase. RESOLUTION NO. 94-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) D10. Approval to Reject all Bids for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Archibald Avenue and Eighth Street ProjecL D11. Approval to execute Cooperative Agreement (CO 94-048), State Agreement No. 8-786, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of Caiifornia for the design and construction of Traffic Control Signals, Safety Lighting and Roadwork on Route 66 at Baker Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 94-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, STATE AGREEMENT NO. 8-786, FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS, SAFETY LIGHTING AND ROADWORK ON ROUTE 66 AT BAKER STREET D12. Approval to execute Flood Control District, Zone 1, Common Use Agreement No. FA 19006 (CO 94-049) for crossings of San Sevaine Creek at Summit Avenue, Henderson Channel at San Sevaine Road and Wardman Channel at Colonberg Road. D13. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 94-050) to conduct an update appraisal of Assessment District 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). D14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Security for Conditional Use Penit 94-11, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and the A.T. & S.F. Railroad Spur Track west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by BHP Steel USA, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 94-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-11 D15. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentalion Cash Deposit for Tract 14121, located at the southwest corner of Milliken and Highland Avenues, submitted by K. Hovnanian Companies of Southern California II, Inc. and release previously submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Cash Monumentalion Deposit accepted by City Council on February 20, 1991, from Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 94-138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 14121 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 20, 1991 D16. Approval to release Improvement Agreement and Bonds, Resolution No. 89-452, accepted from the Caryn Company for Wardman Bullock Road (A.K.A. Lower Loop Road) for Tract 13566-1 and -3, generally located south of 241h Street and west of Cherry Avenue. D17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14407, located on the south west comer of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 94-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14407 D18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Elm Avenue Improvements, located on Elm Avenue West between Church Street and Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 94-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ELM AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander to approve the staff recommendations contained in the staff reports of the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item D3. Motion carded unanimously, 5-0, with Gutierrez abstaining from the minutes of May 26, 1994. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for "21" Off-Sale Ramona Market, Deeb I. Deeb, 9950 West Foothill Boulevard, Units A and B. General for Councilmember Buquet stated he pulled this item so that he could vote against approval, that this was the same establishment that they had discussed in the past and had not approved. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to deny Item D3. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 5 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES No items were submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FI. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - Review of a Development Agreement for the Redevelopment of 380 acres of land, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, bounded on the south by 4th Sweet, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Council was: Jeff Kudlack, General Dynamics, 10900 E. Fourth St., stated he would be happy to answer any questions the Council may have. He stated he has been working closely with staff and should be able to submit grading plans in the next two weeks, and that construction should begin in early October. He thanked staff for their assistance and was happy with the progress that has been made so far. Councilmember Buquet stated at an earlier meeting with General Dynamics, he had requested that they contact the owners of the Rancho Valley Golf Center to explain their project and how it should be compatible with their driving range. He stated that he had heard this had not happened yet Jeff Kudlack, General Dynamics, apologized for not having done that sooner but they had been very busy trying to get the plans developed. He stated that now the design has been ~nalized, he would call the owners right away and share their plans with them. He felt there should be no conflict between the two USes. There being no further response, the public hearing was called. Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 526. ORDINANCE NO. 526 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 94- 01, FOR SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 526 for July 20, 1994. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 6 F2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25-acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east, and the related text and graphic changes - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the Council was: Gary Luque, Western Land Properties, stated he and Dave Newsome, the project manager, were available to answer any questions. He complemented the Community Development staff for all of their cooperation on this project. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 527. ORDINANCE NO. 527 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ONT HE WEST, CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM AVENUE ON THE EAST AND AMENDING VARIOUS TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Gutierrez to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 527 for July 20, 1994. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS HI. STATUS REPORT/UPDATE ON ROUTE 30 FREEWAY (ORAL REPORT) Item H1 was combined for discussion purposes with Item I2. See that portion of the minutes for details. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 7 H2. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION REOUESTING MANDATE RELIEF FROM EXISTING AND NEW PROGRAMS ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE AND CONGRESS Staff report presented by Jack Lam, 'City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public commenL There being no response, public comments were closed. Councilmember Alexander felt there may come a time when they need to do more than just pass a resolution. Councilmember Williams felt some of these mandates would stop if the people who passed them had to abide by them, such as the Brown Act. She agreed that at some point they might have to join some type of group action. RESOLUTION NO. 94-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE MANDATE RELIEF FOR LOCAL GOVF~',IMENT MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Willlares to adopt Resolution No. 94-141. Motion carried 5-0. I. COUNCIl, BUSINESS I1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ONTARIO AIRPORT TERMINAL Mayor Stout stated he asked for this item because he felt the communities surrounding Ontario should be supportive of their efforts to expand the airport because everyone was affected by it. He felt the airport expansion would be good for the economic development of the entire region. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired if there was a consortium of cities that supports this issue. Councilmember Alexander stated the Friends of ~he Airport was a regional group that supported the airport. RESOLUTION NO. 94-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS TO EXPEDITE THE EXPANSION OF THE PLANNED PASSENGER TERMINAL FACILITIES OF THE ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to adopt Resolution No. 94-142. Motion carried 5-0. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 8 12. CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT A BELOW GRADE DESIGNED FREEWAY FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY CORRIDOR THROUGH RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor Stout stated he requested this item because even though the Council has often discussed over the years their desire to see the Foothill Freeway constructed as a below grade freeway, they have never fonnalized that policy and felt it would be appropriate for them to do so at this time by adopting the proposed resolution. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what affect would this resolution have. Mayor Stout felt this freeway was different fxom other freeways in California because they were supported by Federal and State agencies due to their impact on regional transportation. First this freeway was abandoned at the Federal level, then it was abandoned at the State level in the 1970's, and it is only because of the involvement of the local cities along the route recognized the need for another freeway in this area that the idea is active today. He felt because of the involvement of the local cities, that they should have some say in how the freeway should be designed. He felt it was important for them to go on record with their opinion so that all agencies would know what their desires were. He stated he did not know what the final outcome would be, but felt they should have some say in the matter and should lay the foundation now even if delays are occurring. He also wanted to correct a misunderstanding by the press recently that the Council was only now coming around to this way of thinking due to pressure from the residents, which was not true. He stated the Council has always been concerned about how the freeway would be constructed in Rancho Cucamonga and did not want to see it be above grade. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing the Council were: Gaylee Inazumi, Co-Chairperson from Concemed Citizens about Route 30 (C-Car), stated they were asking for the elected officials and community members to come together and form one strong, unified group. She felt they had made strides working separately, but felt it was time to join together. She stated they were looking for the same direction from the Council that has brought other fine projects to the City, such as City Hall, gateway monuments, the upcoming library, etc. She stated none of these projects could have happened without all entities working together as one cohesive group. They wanted to work together to ensure that the Route 30 freeway would meet the design standards of the City and maintain the quality of life that the residents have become accustomed to. She submitted to the Council a list of proposed guidelines for creating an ad hoc committee and asked that this be agendized for the next meeting. Richard Dinkleman, 6938 Onyx, wanted to let the Council know that there were people in the community who did support the building of Route 30. He stated he worked for the engineering department of the City of Ontario, which has 17 freeway miles. He stated he has read that a lot of people believe that depressing the freeway will reduce the noise, but before they committed to a design that would be more costly, he felt they should be aware that whether the freeway is above, at or below grade the height of the soundwall remains the same, so they would not be eliminating soundwails by depressing the freeway. He felt if they were doing it for esthetics that was one thing, but if they were doing it because of sound, they should be aware they would still have a 12-14 foot soundwall. There being no further response, the public comments section was closed. Mayor Stout thought they should have a meeting between the Public Works Subcommittee and C-Car, and have a recommendation come back by the first meeting in August. Councilmember Williams clarified that if the Council were to adopt a formal policy, it would commit future Council's to adhere to these guidelines. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 9 Mayor Stout stated the resolution could be repealed, but it would have to be done at a public meeting. Councilmember Alexander encouraged the participation of the groups concemed about the design of the freeway. He stated he supported the resolution and the comments made earlier, and that they needed to continue to explore design options with Caltrans that were previously planned and look to see if there were ways to improve and save money by using new technology available today. Mayor Stout stated there was more to the concept of a depressed freeway than sound attenuation. He stated he was very concerned with the non-tangible consequence of social planning with respect to dividing a city with an identifiable geographical barrier that currently does not exist because he has seen what it has done to other communities, and he wanted people to be thinking about those consequences. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he also supported the resolution and felt there was plenty of time available for this project to allow for citizen participation, which he thought was very important. RESOLUTION NO. 94-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT FOR A BELOW GRADE DESIGNED FREEWAY FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY CORRIDOR THROUGH RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to adopt Resolution No. 94-143. Motion carried unanimously, 5- 0. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to direct the Public Works Subcommittee to work with C-Car with respect to their proposal to form a combined group, and bring back a proposal that would forrealize the process to the City Council at the first meeting in August. Motion carried unanimously, 54). I3. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO PREVENT CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES Mayor Smut stated he and Councilmember Buquet have been working for some time on this issue based on information provided by a consultant in respect to commercial safety. He spoke about the City of Gainesville, Florida, which had developed an ordinance for this problem and had a decrease of 79% in convenience store robberies. He felt the City should be proactive and institute a program before there was a real problem. He felt this was just the beginning and that they would like to look at other areas of improvement in the future. He stated they were asking the Council for authorization to work with the Chamber of Commerce and the Police Department to develop an ordinance for Rancho Cucamonga. Councilmember Buquet felt they were moving in the right direction and appreciated the Mayor's comments about expanding on this idea. He would also like to see added to the planning process incorporating into new designs a network alarm system for an entire shopping center so that small businesses could also benefit who might not have been able to afford an alarm system otherwise. Councilmember Alexander felt they needed to be careful when wording this ordinance that they were not creating their own unfunded mandates. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like to see this done with new construction and on certain retrofit projects. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 10 Mayor Stout stated he has spoken to owners of convenience stores who are already taking preventative measures, and they would not mind doing more if it were not cost prohibitive because of other City fees. He felt they needed to look at the fee system because the actual improvements are cost beneficial to a business and they did not want to deter them from taking corrective steps because of City fees. Councilmember Williams stated she would like to see banks included in this also. Councilmember Gutierrez concurred with Councilmember Williams. He stated he was also concerned about burglaries and car thefts, and would like to see them look at that one day. Councilmember Buquet felt they might also be able to use this as a marketing opportunity where businesses could provide systems to companies to show how their products work in the marketplace. ACTION: The Law Enforcement Subcommittee and City Staff to work with the Chamber of Commerce and Police Department in developing an ordinance to prevent convenience store robberies, and bring back to the Council for consideration in 90 days. .I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Mayor Stout asked to have an update on the City Seal, when they plan to start using it and other ways that the artwork might be utilized for things other than official documents. J2. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like to have an informational report on where the City is at in developing some form of youth center or youth center activities. Councilmember Williams thought the Park and Recreation Commission had been looking into this and possibly they could have an update from them. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC KI. Marcus Solomon, Berkeley, stated he would be leaving next week for the Goodwill Games in Russia and thanked the Council for their moral support. He asked if the Council would one day take the time again to consider the issue of having a skateboard park in one of the City's park facilities. Councilmember Williams lea the meeting at 8:11 p.m. K2. Emie Mansfield, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, thanked the Council for their work on the Route 30 issue and for listening to the concerns of the citizens. He had heard there was supposed to be a community meeting on July 251h, but felt after hearing the comments tonight they should postpone that meeting until October when more information would be available and people would be in town after their summer vacations. He also inquired about the unfunded mandates the Council had discussed earlier and asked if citizen involvement might help in that area. City Council Minutes July 6, 1994 Page 11 Mayor Stout briefly explained some of the situations faced by cities in regards to the mandates and how it would be very difficult for citizens from one community to make a difference since they affected the entire nation and it was possible that their representative was one that voted against them in the first place. I.. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander to recess the meeting to Executive Session, not to reconvene, to discuss Labor Negotiations per Government Code Section 54957.6 to give Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, direction in regards to the meet and confer process with all City employee groups; Property per Government Code Section 54956.8 located at the southwest corner of the 1-15 freeway and Foothill Boulevard, with Hughes Purcell/Home Depot; James Markman and Linda Daniels negotiators; concerning negotiation of property acquisition/development; and Property per Government Code Section 54956.8, Located on the east side of Rochester, south of Foothill, with Valley Baseball; James Markman and Linda Daniels negotiators; concerning price and terms of payment. Motion carded unanimously, 4-0-1 (Williams absent). The meeting recessed at 8:19 p.m. No action was taken at Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: CiTY OF RANCNO CL ,ONGA LIST OF NARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 06-29-96 (93/943 2315 ZNLANO VHOLeSALe NURSERY 12621 NANILTON L SANUeLS 12622 HiLLCREST CONTRACTING 12623 JESSE HU885 L SONS 12619 KENNETH LEVENTHAL C CO, 12620 MANN C ASSOC., BiLL 2350 MUNiCiPAL SERVICES GROUPw iNC. 3693 NATIONVIDe MOBiLe NONE 2350 MUNICIPAL SERVICES GROUP, ZNC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLieS CFO 88-2 CFD 66-2 CFO 88-2 CFO 88-2 CFO 88-2 LEASE PAYMENT <<< REHAB. PROGRAM LEASE PAYHENT 803 BALDY VleN PUBLIC/PRiVATe COALITION CLOUT MEETING 6292 PRICE CLUB 3192 CSS COMPUTER SERVICE C SALES 3364 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS 211 A P X ALARN SYSTEMS 7960 AOAG 7 ABLeTRONXCS 3070 ABSOLUTe ASPNALTe iNC. 13 ACTION BUSINESS NACHINe$ 6351 AiR HEAT SeRViCe iNC. 1826 AiRTOUCH CELLULAR 1826 AiRTOUCH CELLULAR 669 ALCORN FENCE COMPANY 3594 ALDUS FULFILLMENT CENTER 2603 ALL THE KINGS FLAGS 3446 ALL NELDZNG 6333 ALLEN, SANDRA 6356 ARZCAL PROPeRTiES, iNC, 26 ASSOCZATEO ENGiNeERS 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY, XNC 402 AUTO RESTORATORS 8662 AVXRAH, BeN 6334 BARON, JASON 33 BASeLiNE TRUE VALUE HARDMARE 6335 BAYSiDe BUXLOERS 3803 eZG 5 SPORTING GOODS 1338 BiG A AUTO PARTS 41 BISHOP COMPANY 6336 BOARDROOH CLASSICS 1081 60LZN NAZNT. L JANITORZAL, JOHN 6337 8OURLAND, CHERISH 2440 8URRUSO, LiSA 1851 CAL MESTERN PAINT 594 CALIFORNIA CASUALS RECREATION SUPPLIES OFFICE EQUiPMeNT OFFICe SUPPLIES ALARM SeRVXCe PUELZCATZ0N MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE REPAIRS OFFICe SUPPLIES BUSiNeSS LiCENSe REFUND CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS CELLULAR PHONe 8ILLINGS MAINTENANCe REPAIRS OFFICE EQUXPNeNT FLAGS &SUPPLXeS HAINTeNANCe REPAIRS RECREATION REFUND UNIFORM APPLICATXON REFUND PROFeSSZONAL SERVICES VEHICLE NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHXCLE NAXNTENANCE ReCREATZON ReFUNO RECREATION REFUNO HAINTeNANCE SUPPLXES REFUND 0EPOSZT 8USZNESS LICENSe REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCe MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SUBSCRiPTiONS JANZTORZAL SERVICES RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT NAZNTeNANCE SUPPLIES RECReATiON SUPPLIES ee CHECKI OVERLAP e6209e 19.40- 86210 - 86e8z >>> 86883e 64,210000 868848 18,153.00 86885e 514,190.00 86886, 23e739.00 86887, 13,690.00 86888 - 87191 87193 20,745o78- 87196 - 87282 87283, 8SO.OO 87284 - 87285 87286, 20,745.78 87287 - 87287 87288, 72000 87289- 87290 87291, 60.00 87292- 87336 ))) 67337 15000- 87338- 87494 87495 53.90 87496 1,438.49 87497 43010 87498 58.19 ~ 87499 614018 875oo 75,42 87501 38.35 · 87502 303.77 · 87503 539.78 87506 29008068 87505 80.82 87506 57009Z I 87 ~7 2e775.00 87506 30.00 87509 2e472080 t 87510 906.25 I 87511 21.82 87512 351.00 87513 45.00 67516 24.00 I 87515 22.06 87516 250.00 87517 Z0.18 t 87518 271.80 87519 188.69 67520 29.97 I 67521 t4tg23,00 87522 Z5.00 875ZJ 59.40 87524 1e294,6T t 875ZS 99.14 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LiST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-29-94 (931943 RUN DATES 06129194 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAME iTEM DESCRiPTiON WARR NO WARR. ANT. 4251 CATERZNOe JOHN 3622 CHAMBER QF COMMERCE 6338 CHASE, RICHARD 713 CHZCK'S SPORTING GOODS iNC 73 CITRUS NOTORS ONTARIO, iNCo 6368 CiTY OF CHINQ 76 CITY RENTALS 916 CLAREMONT CAMERA 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 8Z6 COMPUTERViSION CORPORATION 6161 CONCRETE CORING CO. 667 CORONA iNDUSTRiAL SAND COHPANY 85 CUCAMONGA CO HATER OZST 2678 DIPPER TiRE 6339 OAVZLAe ELXZAOETH 1290 DEER CREEK CAR WASH 105 DERBISH GUERRA L ASSOCo 6360 OESPAS, FRANTZ 6341 DESPASt MARLA 107 DETCO 274 DZETZ TOwiNG 4282 DIViSiON T CONSULTING 6355 DOORZLLe SUE 6352 DOLLAR CLEANERS 6137 DUNN EDWAROS CORP. 6362 OUTTONe KARA 523 EASTNINe 6350 FZGUEROAe JON 6Z73 FZRE POZNT EXTiNGUiSHER CO. 3982 FIRST iMPRESSiONS 4017 FLAGHOUSE 6363 FOOTHILL VXOEO 2860 FORD OF UPLAND, INC, 98 FORD PRiNTiNG C NAiLiNG, iNC 6369 FRAME N LENS OPTICAL iNC. 6344 GALLARDOr LAUREN 6345 GARCIA, JESSZCA 6353 GCS SERVICE iNC. 1254 GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION 6346 GREEN, SHARi 6347 GROESSL, NICOLE 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 500 HANSON ASSOCZATESe iNC. 12607 HARREe ASHLEY IZ44 HAVEN BUiLDiNG MATERIALS 662 HCS-CUTLER STEEL 1236 HOSENAN 161 MOYT LUMBER CO,t L"~942 HYDRO 'oK SYSTEMS, ZNC. CHECKIt OVERLAP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 87526 MONTHLY PAYMENT 87527 RECREATION REFUND I 87518 RECREATION SUPPLIES I 87529 VEHICLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLIES It 87530 WEST END CITIES COUNCIL DINNER 87531 EQUiPHINT RENTAL/SUPPLiES 87532 SUPPLXESISERVXCES 87533 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87534 NONTMLY HAXNTENANCE SERVICE i 87535 MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 875~6 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87537 <<< 87538 - 87 560 MONTHLY HATER BiLLiNGS I 87561 VEHICLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLiES 87562 RECREATION REFUND 87543 VEHICLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLiES 87544 CONTRACT SERVICE I 87565 RECREATION REFUND 87546 RECREATION REFUND 87567 OFFICE SUPPLIES t 87548 VEHICLE TOWING 87549 MAINTENANCE REPAiRS/SUPPLiES 87550 REIMBURSE FOR EAP WORKSHOP 87551 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87552 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87553 RECREATION REFUND 87556 OFFICE SUPPLIES t 87555 OVERPAYHENT OF RESTiTUTiON 87556 NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87557 HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 67558 RECREATION SUPPLIES 87559 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87560 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 87561 MAINTENANCE C OPERATIONS 87562 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87563 RECREATION REFUND 87564 RECREATION REFUND 87565 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87566 , MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87567 RECREATION REFUND 87568 RECREATION REFUND 87569 <(< 8TS7O - 87570 ))> NONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS t 87571 HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87572 RECREATION REFUND 87573 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87574 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE I 87575 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87576 RAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87577 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 87578 160.00 ZO0oO0 21.00 3.130.13 155.7Z 32o00 197.88 IS.OO 43.91 2.996.54 IeO.O0 617.35 25.B05.85 1,056.81 25.00 20.95 16e982.69 Z5.00 25.00 168.71 30.00 95.00 47.86 106.Z0 13,21 25.00 252.66 ZZ,SO 19.00 1.335.92 10067.95 Be.e9 158.45 672.29 43.18 25.00 25.00 6.29 266.00 23.00 25.00 2,263.62 577.00 65.00 6.24 769.93 135.64 261.15 39.95 CITY OF RANCHO CUC, GA LiST OF NARRANT~ FOR PERZOOl 06-29-96 (93/943 RUN OATE: 06/29/94 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM OESCRTPTION NARR NO NARR. ANT. 695 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, ZNC 103 I C N A RETIREMENT TRUST-657 4188 Z O BURR 46 iNDUSTRiAL ASPHALT 45 iNLAND FACTORS 612 JAESCHKE iNC., C.R. 12608 JOHNSTON, NZCHOLE 12609 KEHKEJZAN, JENNZCA I2610 KELLEHER, PATRICK 12611 KENNELLET, BROOKE 2611 KERRY CONSULTING GROUP 4168 KENSHAM CONSTRUCTION CO., iNC. 1218 KNOX 321 LANDSCAPE ~EST 849 LANSQN PROOUCTS, iNC. 3957 LEISURE CRAFT ZOO LOS ANGELES TINES 12612 LOVE, CHLOE 12514 LONERIB ELIZABETH 3156 LU*S LIGHTHOUSE, iNC. 569 NARZPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.iNC. 250 NARTXNEZ UNION SERVICE 12617 NASEN, ALICE 12618 MASON, GLORia 12613 MASSAGLZw ANGELZNA 12614 NASSAGLZ, MARLIMA 12605 MASSEYe ALICE 2973 NC CONNELL, RYAN 4030 HELLON ~ ASSOCIATES 602 MEYER, PAT 12616 NKP CONSTRUCTION 4222 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 2350 MUNiCiPAL SERVICES GROUPe INC. 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 2111 NATIONAL FiRE PROTECTION ASSOC. 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE 4281 NICAS$IO, TONY 433 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT 12615 NORIEGA, ELIZABETH 3049 ONTARIO FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO. 235 OMEN ELECTRIC 3953 PACIFIC COAST AiR TOOL 8659 PAETZe LiSA 757 PEP BOYS 8660 PERRZ, JESSZCA 4267 PETE'S ROAD SERVICE 2987 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 4289 PHONG, LORRAINE 1079 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA C~61 P[ROY, CHAD ~ NARLZS ee CHECKt OVERLAP LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87579 DEFERREO CONP 87580 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87581 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87582 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 87583 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 87584 RECREATION REFUND 87585 RECREATION REFUND 87586 RECREATION REFUND 87587 RECREATION REFUND 87588 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES e 87589 PROGRESS ESTIMATE I 87590 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87591 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE t 87592 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87593 RECREATION SUPPLIES I 87594 SUBSCRiPTiON 87595 RECREATION REFUND 87596 RECREATION REFUND 87597 OiL ANALYSIS I 87598 LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE I 87599 TONING SERVICES I 87600 RECREATION REFUNO 87601 RECREATION REFUND 87602 RECREATION REFUND 87603 RECREATION REFUND 87604 RECREATION REFUNO 87605 NiLEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 81606 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE 87607 REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES 87608 DEPOSIT REFUND 67609 RENTAL OF CATERPILLAR RR-ZSO 87610 LEASE PAYMENT 87611 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 87612 HANDBOOKS 87613 UNIFORM SERVICES I 87614 XNSTRUCTOR-C.EeR.T 8!'615 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 87616 RECREATION REFUND 87617 FiRE EXTiNGUiSHER SERVICES 87618 <<( 87619 - 87619 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87620 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87621 RECREATION REFUNDS 87612 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLZE$ I 87623 RECREATION REFUNDS 87624 VEHICLE SERVICE t SUPPLIES I 87625 MONTHLY SERVZCE 876Z6 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 87627 PHOTO SUPPLIES · 87628 RECREATION REFUNDS 87629 550.15 1,200.00 363.24 2e895.24 180.03 288.68 29.00 24,00 24,00 48.00 12,824.52 3,610.01 40.17 36e384.10 65.32 227.54 31.36 24.00 71.75 402.99 34t910.33 210.00 20.00 29.50 24.00 24.00 15.00 45,64 3,600.00 1.58 10000.00 1,e81.80 27,498.55 450.12 375,50 117.54 125.00 166.40 25.00 103.50 13e632.74 336.18 12.00 15Z,35 24.00 68.80 386.15 70.55 105.34 28.00 CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA LIST OF NARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-Z9-94 (931943 RUN DATEr 06/29/94 PAGEs 4 VENDOR NAHE ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. ANT. 4177 P[VAR COMPUTING SERVICES, INC. 255 PORk DISTRIBUTING CO 1049 POMONA VALLEY KAMASAKI 4ZBZ PRICE CLUB 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 8663 R J ENTERPRISES 716 RAH BUSINESS SYSTEMS 228 RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY 4165 RIM LOCK L KEY SERVICE 38Z1 RE-PRiNT CORPORATION 1165 RICHARDSON AUTO 6OOYt INCo 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 4162 ROYAL PIPE L SUPPLY 2196 RUGG LUHBER COMPANY, INC. 8666 SABANI, SUSAN 8665 SALDANA, YVONNE 10Z8 SAM BERN CO OFFICE OF TAX COLLECTOR TAX PAYMENT Z14 SAN BERN CO SOLID MASTE fiGMENT 561 SAN 8ERNAROINO COUNTY 561 SAN 8ERNARDINO COUNTY 132 SAN OlEGO ROTARY 8ROOM COw INC 8666 SENTTt PAUL 8667 SHEARER, SCOTT 8668 SHELL L MILL 2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 351 SIGH SHOP, THE 3276 SINCLAIR PAINT 8532 SIX FLAGS HAGIC MOUNTAIN 319 SO CALXF GAS CO. 1632 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4192 SPAIN,JR,NILLIAN V. 8669 SPECIALTY CLEANING SYSTEMS 8670 SQUIRES, NIKE 8671 STARKe JACOB 2071 STARKt SUSAN M. 4226 STREET SCENE BANNERS 867Z SWANSON, JEROME,MR. 4111 SNIFTY SIGN 2344 TARGET 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 3733 TOM NORLD CONVERSIONS, LTOo IZGZ TILEQUESTIONS 8673 TNELFTH (IZTH) STREET PRODUCTION 4266 TNO GUYS Z4-HRo TONING )SO U-S* POSTMASTER 4Z76 U.S. PRINTING 8674 UNGER, JEFF 8675 VAVRINEKt TRINE, DAY L COo VOICE ~L, INC. COMPUTER SERVICES ~ SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE g SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 6U$INES$ LICENSE REFUNDS PRINTER SUPPLIES REIMBURSE GRANT FUNDS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PRINTS NAINTENANCE REPAIRS HAINT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS MONTHLY SERVICE CAL-ID PROGRAM CAL-ZD PROGRAM NAINT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNOS 6USZNES$ LICENSE REFUNDS SERVICE/SUPPLIES MAZNT SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION TICKETS MONTMLT GAS BILLS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS C.E.RoT. INSTRUCTOR MAINTENANCE SERVICE RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS LGUE OF CITIES FINANCE SEMINAR STREET 6ANNER$ DEPOSIT REFUND SIGN DISPLAYS YOUTH PROGRAM ~ DAY CAMP $UPPL MAINT SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAZNT SUPPLiES/SERViCE EVALUATION TILECORN EQUIPMENT RECREATION REFUND TOHING SERVICE POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NENSLETTER GUIDELINE NANUAL$ REFUNO FALSE ALARM BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS VOICE RAIL SYSTEM-CITY Y ** CHECKI OVERLAP 87630 56.60 87631 11567.68 I 87632 895.61 87633 1tZ86.53 · 87634 108018 87635 16.75 87636 282.46 8 87637 ZSeOZS.ZS I 87638 39.06 87639 70.81 8 87660 1,218.67 e 87641 706.14 I 87642 901.93 87643 8.03 87644 Z3.O0 876~5 30.00 87646 290.91 87647 5,811.11 87668 10.00 87649 793.00 I 87650 527,98 87651 30,00 87652 Z4.00 87653 43e00 t 87654 41080.88 67655 21.55 · 87656 TiT.iT 87657 450.00 · 87658 Zt036.76 81659- 07661 I 87662 20,281.35 87663 112.50 87664 4~0.00 87665 5.00 87666 35.00 81667 Z06.65 87668 39Z,19 87669 5OO.OO I 8~670 259.89 # 81671 108,27 I 87672 Ze367.78 I 87673 365.63 87674 Z,450.O0 87675 SO0.O0 87676 150,00 87677 ZOZ.SO 87678 356.1 T 87679 75.00 87680 ZZ.T9 I 87661 245.82 17662 6e153.00 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCA A LiST OF MARRANTS FOR PER[ODI 06-29-94 (93/96) RUN DATEZ 06/29/96 'ITEM DESCRZPT'IDN MARR NO WARRo AMT. 2360 VORTEX 'INDUSTRIES 8676 NANGf JULIA 6002 MASTE MANAGEMENT iNDUSTRiES 213 WAX'IE, KLEEN-L'INE CORP 8&77 iESTERN LAND PROPERTIES, CAoJO 96 ~OLFZNBARGER ZNCo, O.F, 509 XEROX CORPORATION 37'I ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE MAZNT SERVICE & REPAIRS ** CMECKI OVERLAP I 87683 RECREATION REFUNDS 87684 WASTE MANAGEMENT 87685 NAZNT SUPPLZES # 87686 DEPOSIT REFUND 87687 LANDSCmPE SUPPLZES 87688 COPY MACHINE SUPPL'IEStSERVZCE t 87689 RECREATZON SUPPL'IES 87690 62Z.T9 Z4.O0 54.40 1,024o14 400.00 74.35 3,Z35.t8 42.50 TOTAL 957,613.70 CiTY OF RANCHQ CUCAhwNGA LiST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZOOZ 06-29-96 (96/95) RUN OATEi 06/29/96 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME iTEM DESCRIPTION MARR NO WARRe ANTe 6286 LANDHEZER, 8ETSY 3606 ECOFF, JiLL 6229 8ACZCH, PATRICK 980 C N 8 T A 63 CALZFORNZA PARK L RECREATION 681 CARE AHERZCA HEALTH PLAN 3931 CARNET, MICHAEL 2259 FRECKLES L CONPANT 958 HIGG[NSf NARTZ 12625 XNN 3853 JZLES, LAWTON 4067 JOHNSON, JEFF 179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN 4288 MZLAZZO, THOMAS 2961 PORCUt DANIEL 8678 SANTA ANA ZOO 6253 SHALZNAR TOURS g CHARTER 2878 SPEARS, PATSY 4293 MiLSONe PAT CASH AOVANCE el CHECK8 OVERLAP 87289~ ENPLOTEE/CONNUTER OF THE NONTH # 87290e <<< 6729[ - 87692 ))> PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 87693 RENEN MEMBERSHIP DUES 87696 MEMBERSHIP DUES 87695 MEOZCAL PREMIUM 87696 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 87697 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 87698 C E S a MEETINGS 87699 SEMS MEETING 87700 6TH OF JULY ENTERTAINMENT 87701 ENTERTAZNHENT 8770Z MEDICAL iNSURANCE 87703 6TH OF JULT ENTERTAINMENT 87706 RECREATiON,ENTERTAiNMENT 87705 RECREATION OEPT 87706 RECREATION TRiP I 87707 CONH SERVICES ENTERTAZNNENT 87708 RECREATION 67709 100.00 15.00 350°00 60.00 130.00 Z6tZ66,t6 550.00 950.00 50e00 143.00 200.00 350.00 Z5e941.54 300.00 225.00 64.00 50Z.50 300.00 170.00 TOTAL 54.707,20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LiST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 07-06-96 (93196) ,--,1 mmmmwmmwmmmwmmewwm.wmwwmmmwwwmmw RUN DATE: 01101196 PAGE: NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO MARR. ANT. ,$ CHECKI OVERLAP MONTHLy MAINTENANCE SERVICE I 87535 ((( 87536 - 87713 3364 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS OFFICE SUPPLIES S 87716 688.59 4Z96 AAVCO SUPPLIES/SERVICE 87715 1t783.67 %430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 87716 516.36 2693 AHTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR CO, MONTHLY SERVICE 87717 73.50 4102 B&K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87718 52.80 dBl BANK OF AMERiCA-CORPORATE ADHINZST'RATZON FEES 87719 550.62 1267 BLAKE PAPER CO,. [NC, RECREATION SUPPLIES 87720 115.50 713 CHZCK'S SPORTING GOODS [NC RECREAILON SUPPLIES 8772[ 64.62 2692 COMPUSERVEt INCORPORATED MONTHLY SERVICE 87722 36.62 643 COMPUTERLANO COMPUTER MAZNTENANCEISUPPLIES I 87723 39122i.10 826 COMPUTERVISION CORPORATION HONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE I 87724 Z1996456 <<< 87725 - 87725 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 47776 · (<( 87727 - 87728 ))) 85 CUCAHONGA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY MATER BILLINGS t 87729 26t663413 355 OANI~LS TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE C SUPPLIES 87730 680.07, %05 DERMISM GU~RRA & ASSOC, CONTRACT SERVICE 8773i 7,000.00 4Z32 DIVERSIFIED ~P~NINGSt ZNCo HAINT~NANCE SUPPLIES 87732 265,66 6356 OONLEYe ALBERT PERMIT REFUND 87733 6Z.OO 977 E S R ZSYSTENSt INC. SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES 87736 570.00 3816 EASTLAND CDNSTRUCTiONt INC. PROGRESS ESTIHATE 87735 76t550.85 523 EASTMAN. ZNC OFFICE SUPPLIES # 87736 3102[.53 3806 ETZWANDA SCHOOL DTSTRICT RENTAL OF GYM a ETIWANDA HoS. 87737 361o00 108Z FRANKLIN HUEST CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES 87138 6194 GREG'S ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES. INC4 ' MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87739 3110~.66 137 GTE CALIFORNia MONTHLY TELEPHONE 8ILLINGS e 87760 567.83 1Z627 H.J.R. COMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 8776[ 19.BO 4196 HANSON OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 87762 [21.i9 ~58 HIGGZNSt MARTI C E S A MEETINGS 87763 [2.69 lSd HOLL[DAY ROCK CO.; TNC. HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87746 65403 I6I HOYT LUMBER CO.e S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87745 ~87.68 46 iNDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $ 87146 1t237.96 45 INLAND FACTORS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87747 233.05 1262d KOOL LEATHER CORP, BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87~68 9.00 193 LAZRD CONSTRUCTION CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 87169 Z6tIBIoBi 195 LANCEt SeLL L LUNGHARD AUOZT SERVICES 87150 1t381.00 2866 LIGHTNING PDkDER CO.. INC. PORTABLE SEMI-ZNKLESS KIT 87151 66.05 600 LYNCHt JANIE RECREATION SUPPLIES 87752 33.60 7Z MARK CHRiSt iNC, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 87753 637.90 Z198 MTCHAEL'S CRAFTS RECREATION SUPPLIES 87754 59.53 12626 NOOREt MARVIN Wo 'REFUNOleONO PAYOFF APN 87155 Z4o00 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORN SERVICES I 87756 62.06 4034 NZCHOLSt FRED INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87T57 816.00 2306 OLZVIERt NIChAEL REIMBURSEMENT 87158 77.00 235 GWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 87759 Z,123.77 338 PACIFIC EUUZPT ~ IRRIGATION[ INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 87160 2Z9o29 818 PARAGON 8UZLOZN~ PRODUCTS XNCo CONCRETE SUPPLIES 87763 ~.39 Z6UZ POSTAGE 8T PHONE POSTAGE METER MONTHL~ SERVICES 87162 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87~63 56,63 826 COMPUTERVISION CORPORATION 633 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DTST. 2.994o54- 21473.?? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIODS 0T-06-94 RUN OATE= 07/07196 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION MARR NO MARR. AMTo 228 RANCNO CUCA REDSVELOPN~NT AGENCY 276 RXvERSXOE BLUEPRINT 6162 ROYAL PIPE & SUPPLY 2%96 RUGG LUH~ER COMPANYt INC. ~o79 SAN BERNARD]NO ASSOCIATED GOVTS. 1327 SNART ~ FINAL 1632 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8680 S~AN POOLS 3135 TANNERt O,C, 2366 TARGET 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 693 U.S./NHITE VAN BATTERY CO., [NCo 6050 VALLANCE MASONRY CONSTRUCTION 213 MAXZE, KLEEN-LINE CORP 218 NESTERN HIGHkAY PROOUCTSt INC 267 NESTERN ROCK CO 758 NITS 96 NOLFINbARG~R [NC.t O.Po 509 XEROX CORPORATION 371 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 6261 ZEIMAN NANUFACYURING REZM8URSE GRANT FUNDS PRINTS MAINTENANCE REPAIRS MAINT SUPPLIES REIMBURSE SANBAG OAY CANP SUPPLIES MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS PERMIT REFUND EMPLOYEE SERVICE ANARDS YOUTH PROGRAM L DAY CAMP SUPPL MAINT SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MASONRY REPAIR MAINT SUPPLIES MAZNT SUPPLIES ASPHALT & CONCRETE RECREACTZON SUPPLIES LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES COPY MACMZNE SUPPLIES/SERVICE RECREAIION SUPPLIES FLATBEO RAMP TRAILER · l CHECKI OVERLAP 87766 28It948.57 I 87765 256.85 e 87766 36oI0 I 87767. 121010 87768 28 e 906.00 I 87769 548,81 67770 - 87772 >)) I 87773 39t755.68 e 87776 L66,60 87775 7,711,51 87 176 36.62 87 777 165.00 I 87778 I77o37 87779 2t900.00 87780 662.46 I 87761 926.27 # 87782 120.00 87783 56,61 87786 371,76 I 87785 1.101,36 87786 51,38 87787 6,516.54 TOTAL 570,569.56 · CZTy OF RANCNO CUCANONGA · LZST OF WARRANTS FGR PER[ODZ 07-06-96 (94195). o '~"~::~ ..................,TE~ O~SCR,;;;~"" ......""""-----. ....~ O,T,: 0,,0,,,, P, GE: 1 ,295 PAL,E~. ~1c~ ...........' ........."' ................::~! NO . --RR. ANT. ' ............... . ,oo~ ~,~ ,,~. -~,,..~.,~. ~~-,,-~., .. ~. o.~::;' ......."""'- ................ ..... EUUZPHENT RENTAL 87710, · 877118 375.00 '229 BACZCH PATRZCK ((( 87712 87789 >>> 3000 8HP STEEL U-SoA. PROFESSZONAL $ERVZCES ' 670.00 3931 CARNEYw NZCHAEL REFUNU ELECTRZCAL PERNZT 87790 225°00 3001 CENTEX HONES PRDFESSZONAL SERVZCE$ 87791 REFUND ELECTRZCAL PERNZT 87792 15o00 3002 CHANdER TO THE CHINO VALLEyt THE MORKERS CONp REGZONAL NEETING 87796 Z0o91 3006 CRAMFORO ZNVESTNe;NT 87793 800°00 6286 LANONEZERw dEFSy REFUND ELECTRZCAL PERNZT ' CASH ADVANCe 87795 3055 LOS ANGELES CHZLDRE-NS NUSEUN 12°60 6000 NoS.A° R~CRE~TZON SUPPLZES I 87796 ~000 N-SeA. HENBERSHZp 87797 ZOODO0 3693 NATZONMZDE NUBZLE NONE NEHdERSHZp 87798 791 PHIlDELTA CARE REHA8° PROGRAN 87799 60.00 70.00 NEOZCAL ZNSURANCE I 87800 2086 SAFECO LZFE ZNS. CO. GROUP AONZN. NEOICAL ZNSURANCE 757°86 581 SAN JERNARCZNO COUNTy 87801 ,253 SHALZNAR TOURS C CHARTER CAL-ZU PROGRAN I 87802 6,6 STANOARO [NSURANCE CO. RECREATZON TRZP 87603 62°96 6~6 STANDARO ZNSURANCE CO. ZNSURANCE PRENZUN I 87806 30°00 · 99 VZSZON SERVZCE PLAN - (CA) ZNSURANCE PRENZUN 87805 562,70 1522 ME TZP NONTHLy VZSZON SERVZCE 8ILLZNG 87806 583.20 CZTY COUNCZL AD · 87807 107.50 87808 5.986,50 5,750.00 8' TOTAL 20e836,03 · 97,'~x~94 cITy OF R^NCHO CUCAMGNGA ~TY 1 E TMEN PORTFOLIO MASTER SUMMA~~estmerolram kleur CASH · JUNE 30, 1994 i· TERM MATURITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALENT Certificates of Deposit - Bank ............... $ 15,4'19,566.50 33.95 324 200 '3.506 3.656 Local Agency Investment Funds ............... 15 12,175,000.00 ' 26.81 I 1 4.373 4.434 Bankers Acceptances .......................... $ 4 879 930.56 10 74 182 147 4 866 4 934 ~ · Federal Agency Issues - Coupon ...............~6:496:2S0.00~=:10 628 56g ~:620 ~:698 : Treasury Securities - Coupon ................. $ 534,499.35 1.18 . 708 684 5.337 5.411 : · Treasury Securitlee - Discount ............... $ 3,350,881.16 7.38 358 313 4.829 4.896 · Mortgage Backed Securities ................... $ 1,958,532.59 4.31 1,782 1,129 5.977 6,060 , Small Busjness Adm~nistratjon ................ $ 1,101,562.50 2.43 · MIscellaneous Securities - Discount e 501 904 OO 1 11 9,13a 6,233 8.184 8.298 .......... v ' · · 0,048 7,350 8.315 8.430 · TOTA~ I~VESTMENTS and AVERAGES ............. $ 45,418,126.66 100.00% 650 465 4.567% 4.630% Passbook/Checking Accounts ................... 8 330 958.33 I 973 2 000 % (not included ~n yield calculations) ' - . Accrued Interest at Purchase ................. 8 35,482.94 , TOTAL CASH .............................. e 366 441 27 a ' MONTH ENDING FISCAL FISCAL -' % TOTAL EARNINGS JUNE 30 YEAR TO DATE YEAR ENDING · Current Year $ 172,045.52 $ 1,867,~03.73' $ 1,667,303.73 '/ 07/11,'1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS JUNE 30, 1994 PM - CITY' CASH INVESTMENT PURCHASE. STATED YTM --- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER DATE BOOK VALUE 'FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK 00900 BANK OF AMERICA 05/24/94 00908 BAN[: OF AMERICA 06/23/94 '00888 FOOTHILL INDEP BANK 03/15/94 00870 GREAT WESTERN 11/08/93 00871 GREAT WESTERN 11/08/93 00872 GREAT WESTERN 11/15/93 00874 GREAT WESTERN 11/29/93 00881 GREAT WESTERN 01/20/94 00882 GREAT WESTERN 01/25/94 00883 GREAT WESTERN 02/01/94 00884 GREAT WESTERN O2/15/94 00885 ~REAT WESTERN 02/22/94 00886 GREAT WESTERN O3/O1/94 00891 GREAT WESTERN 03/29/94 00898 GREAT WESTERN 05/12/94 00877 SANWA 01/04/94 00878 SANWA 01/04/94 00894 SANWA 04/29/94 SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES BANKERS ACCEPTANCES 00902 DAI ICHI KANGYO BANK NY FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON 00895 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 00896 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANglS 00897 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES TREASURY SECURITIES - COUPON 00903 BANK OF AMERICA 00904 BANE OF AMERICA 00905 BANK OF AMERICA SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 05/27/94 04/29/94 05/05/94 05/05/94 1,791 645 127 921 500 000 300 000 1,000 000 O0 500 000 O0 500 000 O0 1,700 000 O0 500 000 00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,0OO,0OO.00 2,000,000.00 1,791,645.50 127,921.00 500,000.00 300,000.00 1,000,000.O0 500.000.00 500000.00 1,700000.00 500 000.00 500 000.00 500 000.00 500 000.00 500 000 O0 500 000 O0 2,000 000 O0 1,000 000 O0 1,000 000 O0 2,000 000 O0 50 1,791,645.50 O0 127,921.00 O0 500,000.00 O0 300,000.00 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 1,700,O00.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,0OO,000.00 ~5,419,566.50 2.600 2 600 4 430 3 500 3 600 3 600 3 250 3 250 3 350 3.250 3.750 3.750 3.750 3.750 4.600 3.150 3.150 4.250 2.600 2.636 07/26/94 25 2.600 2.636 07125/94 24 4.430 4.492 03/15/95 257 3.500 3.549 08/08/94 38 3.600 3.650 11/08/94 130 3.600 3.650 11/15/94 137 3.250 3.295 08/29/94 59 3.250 3.295 10/17/94 108 3.350 3.397 01/25/95 208 3.250 3.295 10/31/94 122 3.750 3.802.02/15/95 229 3.750 3.802 02/22/95 236 3.750 3.802 03/01,'95 243 3.750 3.802 03/29/95 271 4.600 4.664 08/14/95 409 3.150 3.194 02/08/95 222 3.150 3.194 01/04/95 187 4.250 4.309 05/02,'95 305 15,419,566.50 15,419,566.50 3,606 3.656 200 11,062,000.00 11,O62,000.00 11,062,0OO.O0 4.434 4.373 4.434 1,113,000.O0 1,113,000.O0 1,113,000.00 4.434 4.373 4.434 12,175,000.00 12,175,000.00 12,175,000.00 4.373 4.434 4,879,930.56 5,000,000.00 4,879,930.56 4.867 4.867 2,000,000.00 2,00Q,O~O.O0 2,000,000.00 5.850 5.770 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5.160 5.089 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 5.850 5.870 5,496,250.00 5,500,000.0~ 5,4'96,250.00 5.620 06/08/94 272,845.00 277,000.00 272,845.00 6.141 6.057 06/07/94 210,151.24 217,000.00 210,151.24 4.600 4.720 06/07/94 51,503.11 52,000.00 51,503.11 4.000 4.039 534,499.35 546,000.00 534,499.35 5.337 4.934 11/25/94 147 5.850 04/29/96 668 5.160 05/01/95 304 5.952 04/29/96. 668 5.698 569 6.141 08/31/97 1,157 4.786 02/09/95 223 4.095 09/01/94 62 5.411 684 * Reverse Repurchase Agreements are negative amounts. O O · · · i$ 07/11/'1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS JUNE 30, 1994 PM - CITY CASH INVESTMENT PURCHASE STATED YTM --- MATURITY DAVE NUMBER ISSUER DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VA~LZ MAR}:ET VALUE RATE ~bc 365 DATE TO MAT TREASURY SECURITIES - DISCOUNT 00892 BANE OF AMERICA 00907 BAN|: OF AMERICA SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES 00071 BAN}[ OF AMERICA 00203 BANE OF AMERICA 00899 BANK OF AMERICA 00069 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS 00002 GIBRALTAR SAVINGS SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 00004 SMALL BUSINESS ADMIN 04/13/94 1,91~,085.56 2,000,000.00 1,913,085.56 4.370 4,518 4,581 04/06/95 279 06/30/94 1,437,795.60 1,515,000.00 1,437,795.60 5.040 5.241 5.314 06/24/95 358 3,350,881.16 3,515,000.00 3,350,881.16 4.829 4.896 313 02/23/87 85,201.08 87,471.44 442,907.10 8.000 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 2,743 09/21/87 191,823.02 207,656.86 612,753.80 8.500 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,908 05/12/94 1,485,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,485,000.00 3,790 5.031 5.101 02/24/95 240 07/01/87 38,223.97 37,470.17 84,710.58 9.000 8.515 8.634 03/15/01 2,451 07/01/87 158,284.52 160,491.28 663,389.28 8.500 8.631 8.751 05/15/01 2,512 1,958,532.59 1,993,089.75 3,288,760.76 5.977 6.060 1,129 MISCELLANEOUS SECURITIES - DISCOUNT 00073 BANK OF AMERICA TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVERAGES 07/25/86 1,101,562.50 1,000,000.00 1,065,142.39 9.125 8.184 8.298 07/25/11 6,233 02/10/87 501,904.00 5,200,000.00 404,872.00 8.430 8.315 8.430 08/15/14 7,350 $ 45,418,126.66 50,348,656.25 46,614,902.72 4.567~ 4.630~ 465 * - Reverse Repurchase Agreements are negative amounts. · · --O · 07/11/1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - CASH JUNE 30, 1994 PM - CITy CASH INVESTMENT PURCHASE STATED --- YTM --- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Accrued Interest at Purchase TOTAL CASH TOTAL CASH and INVESTMENTS 330,958.33 2.~00 1.91'3 2.000 35,482.94 366,441.27 784,587.93 · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 07/11/1994 CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA PM - PORTFOLIO MASTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE CITY JUNE 1, 1994 - JUNE'30, 1994 CASH STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SALES/MATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT # ISSUER RATE DATE ~ OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWALS BALANCE CERTIFICATES OF. DEPOSIT - BANK 00901 BANK OF AMERICA 00908 BANK OF AMERICA SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 2.600 06/23/94 2.600 06/23/94 4.434 4.434 127,921.00 127,921.00 1,962,Q00.00 1,962,000.00 BEGINNING BALANCE: 127,921.00 127,921.00 BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 15,419,566.50 15,419,566.50 11,213,000.00 12,175,000.00 jIigCKING,'SAVINGS ACCOUNTS BAN}: OF AMERICA 2.000 4,989,000.00 BEGINNING BALANCE 5,311,290.00 6?3,248.33 330,958.33 BANI~ERS ACCEPTANCES BEGINNING BALANCE 4,879,930.56 4,879,930.56 FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON BEGINNING BAiANCE: 5,496,250.00 5,496,250.00 TREASURY SECURITIES - COUPON 00903 BANK OF AMERICA 00904 BAN[[ OF AMERICA 00905 BANK OF AMERICA 00906 BANK OF AMERICA SUETOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 6.141 06/08/94 4,600 06/07/94 4,000 06/07/94 3,600 06/07/94 06/30/94 272,845.00 210,151.24 51,503.11 1,434,692.60 1,969,191.95 BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,434,692.60 1,434,692.60 o,oo 534,499.35 TREASURY SECURITIES -- DISCOUNT 00875 BANK OF AMERICA 00907 BANK OF AMERICA SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE 3.240 06/09/94 5.040 06/30/94 1,437,795.60 1,437,795.60 BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,000,341.54 1,000,341.54 2,913,427.10 3,350,881.16 * - Reverse Repurchase Agreements are negative amounts. 07/11/1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA PORTFOLIO RASTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE JUNE 1, 1994 - JUNE 30, 1994 CITY CASH STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SALES/RATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT # ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWALS BALANCE MORTGAGE BACltED SECURITIES 00071 BAN}: OF AMERICA 00203 BANE OF AMERICA 00069 DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS 00002 GIBRALTAR SAVINGS SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE BEGINNING BALANCE: · .000 06/15/94 3,407.30 8.600 06/27/94 8,190.73 9.000 06/02/94 182.49 8.500 06/20/94 1,225.45 1,971,538.56 0.00 13,005.97 1,958,532.59 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION BEGINNING BALANCE: ~,10~,562.50 1,101,562.50 MISCELLANEOUS SECURITIES - DISCOUNT TOTALS BEGINNING BALANCE: BEGINNING BALANCE: 501,904.00 501,904.00 Reverse Repurchase Agreements are negative amounts. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOUC BIVI/tAGI UCINSI(S| To, Deportment of Alcoholic kveroge Control 1901 koodwoy Sacramada, Colft. 9~18 Riterside The underslgned /tireby opp/ie, for licenses described es follower 2. NAME(S) OF APpLICANT(S) 4. Name of Busineu Toeu & Country U. quor 5. Location of Business-Number and Street 12962.-.6~ Foothi I 1 BIrd. City and Zip Cede County XEsCho CucaBcmSs, CA 91739 ~ llernardino 6. If Premises Licensed, Show Type of License 21--2786r~ 8, Mailing Address (If different from 5)--Number and Street 9, Have you ever been convicted of a felony? k Met WHet ,Mee~e ride ibe-4er Heedeeed~ere Ofke Om/y I. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO. RE~C. IPT NO CODE 3~15 Date Issued Temp. Permit Applied under Sac. 24044 Effectiwe Dine:. ZSS 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) ~ to Pe~ trf. Effective Date: FEE $ LIC. TYPE 21 D&PFee , 2A.00 21 Anmml fee RECEIVFO ,#TY OF HANCHO CUCAMON~ ~ CITy C~.D.:~ ' ~6.0r.) J U L - b 1994 , TOTAL 17'~.~0 21 7. Are Premises Inside !'/~c.~i](l~.:iiZt id~.iWZ,~ifqilst~6 Tea Have you ever violated any of the provilionl Of the ~lcohollc ~everage Co~trol ~ct or r~ula~ons of the De~e~l ~r- taining to the Act? :illliLT t."Eapl{l~' ir'"rES"- an*,~vwr-la-ftems-9 'of -~O on ' 12. Applicant agrees (o) that any manager employed in on-sole licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a liceNee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit Io be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic byerage Conlrol Act. 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County *of .......... __RJ,.Y~__IL~_I_4~_ ............... Date__jl'.lZZZZc,~¢_L ............... 14. A -, SIGN HERE ............................................. : ..................................................... I~,'ARA. Zs,q~ IqAVARA. Hte, mle ......... APPLICATION IY TRANSFIROII 15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Rtvern~Lde Date · 5/2/c~ 16. Name(s) of Licenell(s) 17. Signature(s) of Licenell(s) la. License Number(s) TLAIqrABA, Tssn :' 7,: ~',:-'r'-, 21-278696 ~,. 7Y C. "ANCHO 0LI6AUON PLANNING 19. Location Number and Street City and Zip Code Countart Derrmrd~no 12962-6~ FootJttll ~lvd. Pnrt~*hn Cttr,~n, CA n173~ A~och~: ~ecord~ notice, D ........................ 2;;;;.; ..................... CORES ~LED ...... Z~ .............................. D hNwah FN el ........... Paid ~ ............................. O~{e ~ ................. I~eipl ~ ........................ TOWN & COUNTRY LIQUOR 12962-64 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 APN 1100-161-03 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD F"'~TOWN & COUNTRY LIQUOR Currently Zoned: riedium Residential, Subarea 4 of the Foothill Specific Plan Zoning of Adjacent Properties: North: South: East: West: Medium Residential, Subarea 4 of the Foothill Specific Plan Community Commercial, Subarea 4 of the Foothill Specific Plan rledium Residential, Subarea 4 of the Foothill Specific Plan Community Commercial, Subarea 4 of the Foothill Specific Plan sasse 07/06/94 17 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jim Frost, City Treasurer Sandra G. Ramirez, Resource Services SupervisoLZc~ APPROVAL TO ADOPT ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the annual Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND City Council adopted the Statement of Investment Policy in July 1987. However, Assembly Bill 1073, which set up the requirement for the Statement, also mandated that the Statement of Investment Policy be re-approved on an annual basis. Respectfully submitted, JF/SGR/dah attachment STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURPOSE This statement is intended to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of the City's temporary idle cash, and outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system. The ultimate goal is to enhance the economic status of the City while protecting its pooled cash. OBI'ECTIVE The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates its temporary pooled idle cash investment under the Prudent Man Rule (Civil Code Section 2261, et. seq.).* This affords the City a broad spectrum of investment opportunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California (Government Code Section 53600, et. seq.) and other legal restrictions as the City may impose from time to time. Investment may be made in the following media: Securities of the U. S. Government, or its agencies Small Business Administration Loans Certificates of Deposit (or Time Deposits) placed with commercial banks and/or savings and loan companies Negotiable Certificates of Deposits Banker's Acceptances Commercial Paper Local Agency Investment Fund (State Pool) Demand Deposits Repurchase Agreements (Repos) Passbook Savings Account Demand Deposits Reverse Repurchase Agreements Criteria for Selecting investments and the order of priority are: Safety. The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest, or combination thereof. The City only operates in those investments that are considered very safe. * The Prudent Man Rule states in essence, that "investing...property for the benefit of another, a trustee shall exercise the judgement and care, under the circumstances then prevailing, which men of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs..." Statement of Investment Page 2 2, Liquidity. This refers to the ability to "cash in" at any moment in time with minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest. Liquidity is an important investment quality especially when the need for unexpected funds occasionally occurs. 3. Yield. Yield is the potential dollar earnings an investment can provide, and is sometimes described as the rate of return. Safekeeping. Securities purchased from, brokers/dealers shall be held in third party safekeeping by the trust department of our local bank or other designated third party trust, in the City's control, whenever possible. The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinations. Idle cash management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the City Treasurer and/or his appointed designee. The City Treasurer shall be responsible for reviewing and modifying investment guidelines as conditions warrant and submit same for re-approval to the City Council on at least an annual basis. However, the City Treasurer may, at any time, further restrict the items approved for purchase as deemed appropriate. The basic premise underlying the City's investment philosophy is, and will continue to be, to ensure that money is always safe and available when needed. C~Z'~Treasure~ J Citv of Rancho Cucamonga DATE: July 20, 1994 TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF COMPENSATION RESOLUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/1995 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which sets levels of compensation for employees for fiscal year 1994/95, effective July 1, 1994. Background During the past three months staff has met with the City's three bargaining groups. For the first time in four years, the City has the financial ability to offer a modest package to the employees and the groups have accepted the offer. The financial contents of the agreements (2% COLA) are contained in the attached salary resolution. Funding for the adjustment is available within the existing approved 1994/95 budget and does not need any further appropriation. Adoption of this resolution will complete discussions with all City bargaining groups for 1994/95. .ee~.~o~Zmitted' rt l~gLleZ Administrative Services Director RCD/dah attachments RESOLUTION NO. 94-/~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCliO WHEREAS, the City Council of th~/ City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it competes in a marketplace to obtain qualified personnel to perform and provide municipal services, and that compensation and conditions of employment must be sufficiently attractive to recruit and retain qualified employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: SECTION 1: Salary Ranges ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES (Monthly Amounts) Class Title Minimum Step Amount Control Point Maximum Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk I Account Clerk II Account Technician Accountant# Accounting Manager* Accts Payable Supervisor# Admin Secretary 1/ Admin Services Director+ Animal Control Officer I Animal Control Officer II Associate Engineer# Associate Park Planner# Associate Planner~ Asst Building Official* Asst City Manager+ Asst Deputy City Clerk ~/ Asst Engineer# Asst Landscape Designer# Asst Park Plannert Asst Planner# Asst RDA Analyst# Asst to City Manager* Benefits Technician Building Inspection Supv# 2_/ Building Inspector _2/ 315 1,667 335 1,842 370 2,193 409 2,664 483 3,853 400 2,547 374 2,237 555 5,517 337 1,860 357 2,055 475 3,702 442 3,140 452 3,301 510 4,408 599 6,871 321 1,717 445 3,188 400 2,547 .422 2,842 433 3,002 412 2,704 498 4,152 349 1,975 454 3,334 414 2,731 355 2,035 365 2,139 375 2,248 385 2,363 410 2,677 420 2,814 449 3,252 459 3,418 523 4,704 533 4,944 440 3,109 450 3,268 414 2,731 424 2,871 595 6,736 625 7,825 377 2,271 387 2,387 397 2,509 407 2,637 515 4,520 525 4,751 482 3,834 492 4,030 492 4,030 502 4,236 550 5,382 560 5,657 639 8,391 669 9,740 361 2,097 371 2,204 485 3,891 495 4,090 440 3,109 450 3,268 462 3,470 472 3,647 473 3,665 483 3,853 452 3,301 462 3,470 538 5,069 548 5,328 389 2,411 399 2,534 494 4,070 504 4,278 454 3,334 464 3,505 Resolution No. 94- Page 2 Minimum Class Title Step Amount Building Maintenance Worker2/ 344 1,926 Building Official+ 540 5,120 Business License Clerk 338 1,869 Business License Supv# 403 2,585 Business License Tech 368 2,171 Buyer# 400 2,547 Cashier/Account Clerk 315 1,667 City Engineer+ 560 5,657 City Manager+ City Planner+ 552 5,436 Code Enforcement Officer 2/ 398 2,522 Code Enforcement Supv# 2/' 428 2,929 Code Enforcement Tech 358 2,065 Community Dev Director+ 590 6,570 Community Services Director+ 545 5,249 Community Services Manager+ 526 4,774 Community Services Officer 376 2,260 Community Services Tech 384 2,351 Computer Operator 367 2,160 Counter Plans Examiner# 444 3,172 Crime Analyst# 423 2,856 Custodian 2/ 344 1,926 Data Base Managmnt Analyst# 469 3,593 Data Processing Manager* 498 4,152 Deputy City Clerk# 382 2,328 Deputy City Engineer* 530 4,871 Deputy City Manager+ 546 5,275 Deputy City Planner* 522 4,680 Disaster Prep Manager* 483 3,853 Disaster Prep Specialist 393 2,459 Electrical Specialist# _2/ 434 3,017 Engineering Aide 385 2,363 Engineering Technician 405 2,611 Equipment Operator 2/ 372 2,215 Executive Assistant~ 413 2,717 Facilities Supervisor~ 438 3,078 Finance Officer+ 525 4,751 Fleet Maintenance Supt* 2_/ 478 3,758 GIS Supervisor# 452 3,301 GIS Technician 397 2,509 Integrated Waste Coordinator* 500 4,194 Inventory Special. Equip/Mat 2/ 348 1,965 Junior Engineer 415 2,745 Junior Engineering Aide 365 2,139 Landscape Designer# 430 2,958 Lead Maintenance Worker 2_/ 382 2,328 Lead Mechanic 2__/ 406 2,624 Librarian I 400 2,547 Librarian II# 422 2,842 Control Point Step Amount 384 2,351 580 6,250 378 2,282 443 3,156 408 2,650 440 3,109 355 2,035 600 6,906 666 9,596 592 6,636 438 3,078 468 3,575 398 2,522 630 8,023 585 6,408 566 5,829 416 2,758 424 2,871 407 2,637 484 3,872 463 3,487 384 2,351 509 4,386 538 5,069 422 2,842 570 5,946 586 6,400 562 5,713 523 4,704 433 3,002 474 3,684 425 2,885 445 3,188 412 2,704 453 3,317 478 3,758 565 5,800 518 4,588 492 4,030 437 3,063 540 5.120 388 2.399 455 3.351 405 2.611 470 3.611 422 2.842 446 3.204 440 3,109 462 3,470 "' T ........... Maximum Step Amount 394 2,472 610 7,260 388 2,399 453 3,317 418 2,786 450 3,268 365 2,139 630 8,023 622 7,709 448 3,236 478 3,758 408 2,650 660 9,312 615 7,444 596 6,769 426 2,899 434 3,017 417 2,772 494 4,070 473 3,665 394 2,472 519 4,611 548 5,328 432 2,988 580 6,250 616 7,481 572 6,006 533 4,944 443 3,156 484 3,872 435 3,033 455 3,351 422 2,842 463 3,487 488 3,950 595 6,736 528 4,822 502 4,236 447 3,220 550 5,382 398 2,522 465 3,522 415 2,745 480 3,796 432 2,988 456 3,367 450 3,268 472 3,647 Resolution No. 94- Page 3 Class Title Minimum Step Amount Library Assistant I 318 1,692 Library Assistant II# 354 2,025 Library Clerk 313 1,650 Library Manager+ 524 4,727 Library Technician 394 2,472 Maint Supervisor# ~/ 438 3,078 Maint Mechanic 2/ 391 2,435 Maint Worker ~/' 344 1,926 Management Aide 393 2,459 Management Analyst I# 423 2,856 Management Analyst II# 452 3,301 Mechanic_2/ 391 2,435 Mechanic's Assistant 2/ 344 1,926 Microcomputer SpecialTst 397 2,509 Office Services Clerk 311 1,634 Office Specialist I 291 1,479 Office Specialist II 1/ 311 1,634 Park Construction/Acq~ist Supv# 468 3,575 Park Planning/Dev Supt* 485 3,891 Park/Lands. Maint Supt* ~/ 478 3,758 Personnel Analyst I# 397 2,509 Personnel Analyst II# 452 3,301 Personnel Clerk 339 1,879 Personnel/Risk Manager* 498 4,152 Plan Check Coordinator* 480 3,796 Planning Commission Secy# 382 2,328 Planning Technician 373 2,226 Plans Examiner# 434 3,017 Plans Examiner-Grading~ 2/ 434 3,017 Plumbing/Mechanical SpecTalist# 434 3,017 Police Clerk** 317 1,684 Principal Librarian* 460 3,435 Principal Planner* 502 4,236 Principal Plans Examiner# 460 3,435 Programmer/Analyst# 450 3,268 Public Service Technician 365 2,139 Public Works Engineer* 2/ 500 4,194 Public Works Inspector T 2/ 397 2,509 Public Works Inspector II'Z/ 417 2,772 Public Works Maint Mgr* ~/ 508 4,364 Purchasing Agent* 483 3,853 Receptionist 301 1,554 Records Clerk 311 1,634 Records Manager/City Clerk* 508 4,364 Recreation Coordinator 391 2,435 Recreation Superintendent* 496 4,111 Recreation Supervisor# 421 2,828 Redevelopment Analyst# 442 3,140 Redevelopmerit Manager+ 537 5,044 Rehab Specialist# ~/ 434 3,017 Control Point Step Amount 358 2,065 394 2,472 353 2,015 564 5,771 434 3,017 478 3,758 431 2,973 384 2,351 433 3,002 463 3,487 492 4,030 431 2,973 384 2,351 437 3,063 351 1,995 331 1,805 351 1,995 508 4,364 525 4,751 518 4,588 437 3,063 492 4,030 379 2,294 538 5,069 520 4,634 422 2,842 413 2,717 474 3,684 474 3,684 474 3,684 357 2,055 500 4,194 542 5,171 500 4,194 490 3,990 405 2,611 540 5,120 437 3,063 457 3,384 548 5,328 523 4,704 341 1,898 351 1,995 548 5,328 431 2,973 536 5,019 461 3,452 482 3,834 574 6,066 474 3,684 Maximum Step Amount 368 2,171 404 2,598 363 2,118 594 6,702 444 3,172 488 3,950 441 3,125 394 2,472 443 3,156 473 3,665 502 4,236 441 3,125 394 2,472 447 3,220 361 2,097 341 1,888 361 2,097 518 4,588 535 4,994 528 4,822 447 3,220 502 4,236 389 2,411 548 5,328 530 4,871 432 2,988 423 2,856 484 3,872 484 3,872 484 3,872 367 2,160 510 4,408 552 5,436 510 4,408 500 4,194 415 2,745 550 5,382 447 3,220 467 3,557 558 5,601 533 4944 351 1.995 361 2097 558' 5.601 441 3.125 546 5.275 471 3.629 492 4,030 584 6,376 484 3,872 Resolution No. 94- P age 4 Class Title Control Minimum Point Step Amount Step Amount Resource Services Supv# 452 3,301 492 4,030 Risk Management Analyst# 423 2,856 463 3,487 Secretary 1/ 344 1,926 384 2,351 Signal & Li"ghting Tech 2/ 422 2,842 462 3,470 Special Districts Super# 452 3,301 492 4,030 Special Districts Tech 384 2,351 424 2,871 Special Districts Tech II 404 2,598 444 3,172 Sr Account Tech 384 2,351 424 2,871 Sr Accountant# 452 3,301 492 4,030 Sr Administrative Secy 1/ 382 2,328 422 2,842 Sr Business License Te~ 383 2,340 423 2,856 Sr Civil Engineer* 510 4,408 550 5,382 Sr GIS Technician 417 2,772 457 3,384 Sr Maintenance Worker _2/ 354 2,025 394 2,472 Sr Planner* 482 3,834 522 4,680 Sr Plans Examiner-Bldg# 454 3,334 494 4,070 Sr Plans Examiner-Fire# 454 3,334 494 4,070 Sr Records Clerk 321 1,717 361 2,097 Sr Redevelopment Analyst* 472 3,647 512 4,452 St/Storm Drain Maint Supt*_2/ 478 3,758 518 4,588 Structural Specialist# 2/ 434 3,017 474 3,684 Superv Animal Cntrl OffTcer# 387 2,387 427 2,914 Superv Public Works Ins~ 2,/ 447 3,220 487 3,930 Systems Analyst# 469 3,593 509 4,386 Technician 368 2,171 408 2,650 Traffic Engineer* 515 4,520 555 5,517 Maximum Step Amount 502 4,236 473 3,665 394 2,472 472 3,647 502 4,236 434 3,017 454 3,334 434 3,017 502 4,236 432 2,988 433 3,002 560 5,657 467 3,557 404 2,598 532 4,919 504 4,278 504 4,278 371 2,204 522 4,680 528 4,822 484 3,872 437 3,063 497 4,131 519 4,611 418 2,786 565 5,800 Admin Intern 287 8.36 327 10.21 337 10.73 Asst Pool Manager 272 7.76 312 9.47 322 9.96 Crossing Guards 207 5.61 247 6.85 257 7.20 Instructor/Guard I 207 5.61 247 6.85 257 7.20 Instructor/Guard II 247 6.85 287 8.36 297 8.79 Library Aide 158 4.39 198 5.37 208 5.63 Library Clerk 313 9.52 353 11.62 363 12.22 Library Page 198 5.37 238 6.59 248 6.88 Maint Tech 247 6.85 287 8.36 297 8.79 Planning Aide 287 8.36 327 10.21 337 10.73 Pool Manager 296 8.75 336 10.68 346 11.22 Program Specialist 278 8.00 318 9.76 328 10.26 Recreation Aide 168 4.62 208 5.94 218 5.93 Recreation Assistant I 207 5.61 247 6.85 257 7.20 Recreation Assistant II 233 6.39 273 7.80 283 8.20 Recreation Leader 257 7.20 297 8.79 307 9.24 **This classification when assigned to shifts other than day shift shall have an additional pay of 40 cents per hour. When acting as Clerk to 1,/ Council/Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of $50 at the option of the employee. Resolution No. 94- Page 5 2/Up to $150 provided annually toward purchase of approved safety footware from a city designated vendor. # Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class * Denotes Manage~nent Class + Denotes Executive Class Executive Management employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 15% (30 salary code steps} above the control point. All other employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% {40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 5% {10 salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments, growth within the position. SECTION 3: Three tiered Management Program Employees designated as either Professional/Supervisory, Management, or Executive Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general employees and the following: Supervisory/Professional Administrative leave to a maximum of fifty hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. Life insurance policy of an additional twenty thousand dollars. Deferred compensation program of two percent of salary. Management Administrative leave to a maximum of seventy five hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. Life insurance policy of an additional twenty thousand dollars. Deferred compensation program of four percent of salary. Executive Management Administrative leave to a maximum of one hundred hours per fiscal. year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. Automobile allowance of $250.00 per month if a City vehicle is not provided. Life insurance policy of an additional thirty thousand dollars. Deferred compensation program of six percent of salary. Resolution No. 94- Page 6 SECTION 4: Life Insurance The City provides $30,000 base coverage of life insurance for all employees. Employees who want to Purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the city's group rate. SECTION 5: Health Insurance The City provides health insurance plans available to all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of medical insurance for all current employees as one group, providing for no additional payment by employees for coverage through June 30, 1995. The City will provide up to $337 per month in medical coverage for all full time employees hired after July 1, 1994. SECTION 6: Retiree Medical Employees who retire at the age of 55 or above with ten years of service with the City of Rancho Cucamonga can pay for medical insurance at a group rate through the City until 18 months prior to the age of 65 at which time they can convert to Cobra. SECTION 7: Dental Insurance The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of dental insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials effective July 1, 1994. SECTION 8: Optical Insurance The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of optical insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials effective July 1, 1994. SECTION g: Vacation All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, working hours of vacation monthly according to the following schedule: Length of Service Hours Accrued Annual Hours in Years Per Pay Period Accrued 1 3.077 80 2 3.461 gO 3 3.846 100 4 4.230 110 5 4.615 120 6-8 5.000 130 g 5.384 140 10 5.769 150 11-13 6.153 160 14 6.538 170 15+ 6.923 180 accrue Resolution No. 94- Page 7 SECTION 10: Sick Leave All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. SECTION 1l: Sick Leave Buyback Employees who terminate their city employment after five .years of continuous service and have at least 50% of five years' sick leave accrued on the books upon termination can sell 120 hours back to the City. SECTION 12: Personal Leave Employees can use up to 20 hours of accrued sick leave as personal leave. This 20 hours can be used incrementally {i.e., I hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for emergency situations requiring the employee's attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. SECTION 13: Holidays The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full time continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days. (2) (3) ) (6) (7) (8) (12) July 4 - Independence Day September 5 - Labor Day - The first Monday in September November 10 - Veteran's Day November - Thanksgiving Day {November 24) November - The day following Thanksgiving (floater) December 22 - The day preceding Christmas December 26 - Christmas Day January 2 - New Years January 16 - Martin Luther King's Birthday February 20 - President's Day May 29 - Memorial Day Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her convenience who has successfully completed probation subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to next. Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs {Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc) where two consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hall being open to serve the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and the other holiday will become a floating holiday. For example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday, however Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. In the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Years, employees will have until June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also those days will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occured. Each year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays. Resolution No. 94. Page 8 For fiscal year 94-95 a floating holiday will be provided for the day following Thanksgiving. SECTION 14: Holiday Time The City agrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not their regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time and one-half for working that day. This time and one-half may be taken as compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank, (in effect, compensating at double time and one-half). That rate of compensation is tallied as follows: the ten hours compensation for the holiday, plus compensation at time and one-half for the hours actually work. This payment at time and one-half abrogates the employees right to that holiday. SECTION 15: Premium Holiday Compensation Maintenance employees required as part of the regular work assignment to work on Christmas Day, New Years Day, Independence Day or Thanksgiving Day, are allowed to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these employees who work on the aforementioned designated holidays may select to receive compensation on that holiday at time and one-half for the ten hour shift, or take a second holiday as time off at a later date. SECTION 16: Natal and Adoption Leave without Pay Employees are granted up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption of a child. Employees on this leave of absence without pay will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence. SECTION 17: Natal and Adoption Leave with Pay Employees are granted up to 2 days natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or adoption of a child. Any paid time required beyond this initial 2 days must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time. SECTION 18: Bereavement Leave When a death occurs in the family of a full time employee, the employee shall be granted up to five (5) bereavement leave days with Day. Family members are defined as follows: employee's spouse, employee's parents, employee's grandparents, employee's children, employee's spouse's parents, siblings, a blood relative residing with employee. The department head and the City Manager shall approve such bereavement leave. SECTION 19: Military Leave Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period. Resolution No. 94- Page 9 SECTION 20: Overtime - Maintenance The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 10 worked in that shift. Employees who are subsequently recal led to work the storm or emergency situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in excess of 10 in that 12 hour shift will be paid at time and one- half, regardless of the total numbers of compensated hours for that work week. SECTION 21: Standby Pay Employees required to be on standby shall be compensated at the rate of $128 per week. SECTION 22: Safety Footwear The City will provide up to $150 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear as part of their job responsibilities. SECTION 23: Confidential Employees Confidential employees are designated as such when an employee in the course of his or her duties, has access to information relating to the City's administration of emPloyer-emp)oyee relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organiz- ations which represent other employees of the City. The employees designated as confidential employees are as follows: Personnel Analyst Personnel Clerk Benefits Technician Account Technician - Payroll Office Specialist II - Admin Svc Secretary Planning Commission Secretary SECTION 24: Admin Secretary Sr Admin Secretary Risk Management Analyst Deputy City Clerk Records Clerk Records Manager/City Clerk The provisions of the amended sections of this resolution are effective July 20, 1994. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of July, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Resolution No. 94- P age 10 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of July, 1994. Executed this 20th day of July, 1994 at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J. Adams, City Clerk 31 BASIC SCHEDULE I -- SALARY CODE TABLE PAY SCHEDULE IN HOURLY, BI-WEEKLY AND MONTHLY ONE HALF PERCENT BETWEEN RANGES MONTHLY AMOUNTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR Resolution AMOUNTS No. 94- Page 11 Range Number 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182. 183. 184. 185. 186. 187. 188. 189. 190. Hourly Rate 4.2439 4.2651 4. 2865 4.3079 4. 3294 4.3511 4. 3728 4.3947 4.4167 4.4388 4.4620 4.4833 4.5057 4.5282 4.5508 4.5736 4.5965 4.6194 4.6425 4.6658 4.7891 4.7125 4.7361 4.7598 4.7836 4.8075 4.8315 4.8557 4.8800 4.9044 4.9289 4.9535 4.9783 5.0032 5.0282 5.0533 5.0786 5.1040 5.1295 5.1552 Bi-Weekly Monthly Ran e Hourly Rate Rate ~r Rate 339.5134 736 19l. 5.1809 341.2109 739 192. 5.2069 342.9170 743 193. 5.2329 344.6316 747 194. 5.2591 346.3547 750 195. 5.2853 348.0865 754 196. 5.3118 349.8269 758 197. 5.3383 351.5761 762 198. 5.3650 353.3340 766 199. 5.3919 355.1006 769 200. 5.4188 356.8761 773 201. 5.4459 358.6605 777 202. 5.4731 360.4538 781 203. 5.5005 362.2561 785 204. 5.5280 364.0674 789 205. 5.5556 365.8877 793 206. 5.5834 367.7171 797 207. 5.6113 369.5557 801 208. 5.6394 371.4035 805 209. 5.6676 373.2605 809 210. 5.6959 375.1268 813 211. 5.7244 377.0025 817 212. 5.7530 378.8875 821 213. 5.7818 380.7819 825 214. 5.8107 382.6858 829 215. 5.8398 384.5992 833 216. 5.8690 386.5222 837 217. 5.8983 388.4548 842 218. 5.9278 390.3971 846 219. 5.9574 392.3491 850 220. 5.9872 394.3109 854 221. 6.0172 396.2824 859 222. 6.0472 398.2638 863 223. 6.0775 400.2551 867 224. 6.1079 402.2564 872 225. 6.1384 404.2677 876 226. 6.1691 406.2890 880 227. 6.1999 408.3205 885 228. 6.2309 410.3621 889 229. 6.2521 412.4139 894 230. 6.2934 B i -Week ly Rat__e 414.4760 416.5483 418.6311 420.7242 422.8279 424.9420 427.0667 429.2020 431.3481 433.5048 435.6723 437.8507 440.0399 442.2401 444.4513 446.6736 448.9070 451.1515 453.4073 455.6743 457.9527 460.2424 462.5436 464.8564 467.1806 469.5165 471.8641 474.2234 476.5946 478.9775 481.3724 483.7793 486.1982 488.6292 491.0723 493.5277 495.9953 498.4753 500.9677 503.4725 Monthly Rate 898 903 907 912 916 921 925 930 935 939 944 949 953 958 963 968 973 977 982 987 992 997 1002 1007 1012 1017 1022 1027 1033 1038 1043 1048 1053 1059 1064 1069 1075 1080 1085 1091 Resolution No. 94- Page 12 Ran e Hourly ~r Rate 231. 6. 3249 232. 6. 3565 233. 6.3883 234. 6. 4202 235. 6.4523 238. 6.5496 239. 6. 5823 240. 6.6153 241. 6. 6483 242. 6.68 16 243. 6. 7150 244. 6. 7486 245. 6. 7823 246. 6.8162 247. 6.8503 248. 6. 8845 249. 6.9190 250. 6. 9536 251. 6. 9883 252. 7.0233 253. 7.0584 254. 7.0937 255. 7. 1291 256. 7. 1648 257. 7. 2006 258. 7. 2366 259. 7.2728 260. 7. 3092 261. 7.3457 262. 7. 3824 263. 7.4193 264. 7.4564 265. 7.4937 266. 7. 5312 267. 7. 5689 268. 7. 6067 269. 7. 6447 270. 7. 6830 271. 7.7214 272. 7. 7600 273. 7. 7988 274. 7. 8378 275. 7.8770 276. 7. 9163 277. 7. 9559 278. 7. 9957 279. 8.0357 280. 8.0759 Bi-Weekly Monthly ~at~ Rat~ 505.9899 1096 508.5198 1102 511.0624 1107 513.6177 1113 516.1858 1118 ~]7667 1124 3606 1130 523.9674 1135 526.5872 1141 529.2202 1147 531.8663 1152 534.5256 1158 537.1982 1164 539.8842 1170 542.5836 1176 545.2965 1181 548.0230 1187 550.7631 1193 553.5170 1199 556.2845 1205 559.0660 1211 561.8613 1217 564.6706 1223 567'.4940 1230 570.3314 1236 573.1831 1242 576.0490 1248 578.9292 1254 581.8239 1261 584.7330 1267 587.6567 1273 590.5950 1280 593.5479 1286 596.5157 1292 599.4982 1299 602.4957 1305 605.5082 1312 608.5358 1318 611.5784 1325 614.6363 1332 617.7095 1338 620. 7981 1345 623. 9021 1352 626 1365 633.3075 1372 636.4740 1379 639.6564 1386 642.8546 1393 645.0689 1400 ~r 281. 282. 283. 284. 285. 286. 287. 288. 289. 290. 291. 292. 293. 294. 295. 296. 297. 298. 2gg. 300. 301. 302. 303. 304. 305. 306. 307. 308. 309. 310. 311. 312. 313. 314. 315. 316. 317. 318. 319. 320. 321. 322. 323. 324. 325. 326. 327. 328. 329. 330. Hourly ~ate 8.1162 8.1568 8.1976 8.2386 8.2798 8.3212 8.3628 8.4046 8.4466 8.4889 8.5313 8.5740 8.6168 8.6599 8. 7032 8.7467 8. 7905 8.8344 8.8786 8.9230 8.9676 9.0124 9.0575 9.1028 9.I483 9.1940 9.2400 9.2862 9.3326 9.3793 9.4262 9.4733 9.5207 9.5683 9.6161 9.6642 9.7125 9.7611 9.8099 9.8590 9. 9083 9.9578 10.0076 10. 0576 10. 1079 10. 1585 10. 2092 10. 2603 10.3116 10. 3632 Bi-Weekly Monthly Rat_,,__~e Late 648.2993 1407 652.5458 1414 655.8085 1421 659.0875 1428 662. 3830 1435 665.6949 1442 669.0234 1450 672.3685 1457 675.7303 1464 679.1090 1471 682.5045 1479 685.9170 1486 689.3466 1494 692.7933 1501 696.2573 1509 699.7386 1516 703.2373 1524 706.7535 1531 710.2872 1539 713.8387 1547 717.4079 1554 720.9949 1562 724.5999 1570 728.2229 1578 731.8640 1586 735.5233 1594 739.2009 1602 742.8969 1610 746.6114 1618 750.3445 1626 754.0962 1634 757.8667 1642 761.6560 1650 765.4643 1659 769.2916 1667 773.1381 1675 777.0038 1684 780.8888 1692 784.7932 1700 788.7172 1709 792.6608 1717 796.6241 1726 800.6072 1735 804.6103 1743 808.6333 1752 812.6765 1761 816.7399 1770 820.8236 1778 824.9277 1787 829.0523 1796 Ran e 331. 332. 333. 334. 335. 336. 337. 338. 339. 340. 341. 342. 343. 344. 345. 346. 347. 348. 349. 350. 351. 352. 353. 354. 355. 356. 357. 358. 359. 360. 361. 362. 363. 364. 365. 366. 367. 368. 369. 370. 371. 372. 373. 374. 375. 376. 377. 378. 379. 380. Hourly Rate 10.4150 10.4670 10.5194 10.5720 10.6248 10.6780 10.7314 10. 7850 10.8389 10.8931 10. 9476 11.0023 11.0573 11. 1126 11.1682 11. 2240 11. 280 2 11. 3366 11. 3932 11.4502 11.5075 11. 5650 11.6228 11.6809 11. 7393 11. 7980 11.8570 11.9163 11.9759 12.0358 12.0959 12.1564 12.2172 12. 2783 12.3397 12.4014 12.4634 12.5257 12. 5883 12.6513 12.7145 12.7781 12.8420 12. 9062 12. 9707 13.0356 13. 1008 13. 1663 13.2321 13. 2983 Bi-Weeklv Rate '833. 1976 837. 3636 84 1. 5504 845.7581 849.9869 854. 2369 858. 5080 862.8006 867.1146 871. 4502 875.8074 880. 1864 884. 5874 889.0103 893.4554 897.9226 902.4123 906. 9243 911.4589 916.0162 920.5963 925. 1993 929.8253 934.4744 939. 1468 943.8425 948. 5617 953. 3045 958.07ll 962.86 14 967.6757 972.5141 977.3767 982. 2636 987. 1749 992. 1108 997.0713 1002.0567 1007.0669 1012. 1023 1017.1628 1022. 2486 1027. 3598 1032.4966 1037.6591 1042.8474 1048.0617 1053. 3020 1058. 5685 1063.8613 Monthly Rate 1805 1814 1823 !832 1842 1851 1860 1869 1879 1888 1898 1907 1917 1926 1936 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2076 2086 2097 2107 2118 2128 2139 2150 2182 2193 2204 2215 2226 2237 2248 2260 2271 2282 2294 2305 Ran e Hourly ~r R ate 381. 13.3648 382. 13.4316 383. 13.4987 384. 13.5662 385. 13.6341 386. 13.7022 387. 13.7707 388. 13.8396 389. 13.9088 390. 13.9783 391. 14.0482 392. 14.1185 393. 14.1891 394. 14.2600 395. 14.3313 396. 14.4030 397. 14.4750 398. 14.5474 399. 14.6201 400. 14.6932 401. 14.7667 402. 14.8405 403. 14.9147 404. 14.9893 405. 15.0642 406. 15.1395 407. 15.2152 408. 15.2913 409. 15.3678 410. 15.4446 411. 15.5218 412. 15.5994 413. 15.6774 414. 15.7558 415. 15.8346 416. 15.9138 417. 15.9933 418. 16.0733 419. 16.1537 420. 16.2344 421. 16.3156 422. 16.3972 423. 16.4792 424. 16.5616 425. 16.6444 426. 16.7276 427. 16.8112 428. 16.8953 429. 16.9798 430. 17.0647 Resolution No. P~ Bi-Weekly Mont Rat___~e ~ 1069.1806 23!7 1074.5265 2329 1079.8992 2340 !085.2987 235! 1090.7252 2363 1096.1788 2375 1101.6597 2387 1107.!680 2399 1112.7038 241! 1118.2673 2423 1123.8587 2435 1129.4780 2447 1135.1254 2459 1140.8010 2472 1146.5050 2484 !152.2375 2497 1157.9987 2509 1163.7887 2522 1169.6076 2534 1175.4557 2547 1181.3329 2560 1187.2396 2572 1193.1758 2585 1199.1417 2598 1205.1374 261! 1211.1631 2624 1217.2189 2637 1223.3050 2650 1229.4215 2664 1235.5686 2677 1241.7465 2690 1247.9552 2704 1254.1950 2717 1260.4660 2731 1266.7683 2745 1273.1021 2758 1279.4676 2772 1285.8650 2786 1292. 2943 2800 1298. 7558 2814 1305. 2496 2828 1311.7758 2842 1318.3347 2856 1324.9264 2871 1331.5510 2885 1338.2087 2899 1344.8998 2914 1351/6243 29?9 1358.3824 2943 1365.1743 2958 R esG'~llu. tion No, 94- P.,~.. tL4a, Hourly Bi -Weekly . r Rate Rate '~)~., 17. 1500 I372.0002 -.~)F~, 17,2358 1378.8602 · tl5, 17,3219 1385.7545 ~3ql, 17 .~085 1392. 6833 .~t315, i7.4956 1399. 6467 ~M,, 17,583l 1406,6449 {3l, 17,6710 1413.6781 ~t~, 17,7593 1420,7465 ~- 17~8481 1427,8503 ~4X), I7,9374 1434,9895 441, 18,0271 1442,1645 442, 18,1172 1449,3753 443, 18,2078 1456,6222 444, 18,2988 1463. 9053 445, 18, 3903 1471,2248 446, 18,4823 1478,5809 447, 18,5747 1485,9738 448, 18,6577 1493,4037 449, I8, 7609 1500,8707 450, I8,8547 1508,3751 451, 18,9490 1515,9169 452, 19,0437 1523,4965 453, 19,1389 1531.1140 454, 19,2346 1538,7696 455, 19,3308 1546,4634 456, 19,4274 1554. 1957 457, 19. 5246 1561,9667 458, lg,6222 1569,7766 459, 19,7203 1577,6254 460, 19,8189 1585,5136 461, lg,9180 1593,4411 462, 20.0176 1601.4083 463, 20,1177 1609,4154 464, 20,2183 1617,4625 465, 20,3194 1625,5498 466, 20,4210 1633,6775 467, 20,5231 1641,8459 468, 20,6257 1650.0551 469, 20,7288 1658,3054 470, 20.8325 1666,5969 471, 20,9366 1674,9299 472, 474, 21,2522 1700, 1797 475, 21,3585 1708,6806 476, 21,4653 1717.2240 477, 21,5726 1725,810l 479, 21,7889 1743: 480, 21,8978 1751,8269 Month ly Rate 2973 2988 3002 3017 3033 3048 3063 3078 3094 3109 3125 3140 3!56 3172 3188 3204 3220 3236 3252 3268 3284 3301 3317 3334 3351 3367 3384 3401 3418 3435 3452 3470 3487 3505 3522 3540 3557 3575 3593 3611 3629 3647 3665 3684 3702 3721 3739 3796 Ran e ~r ~1, ~8.3 , 48~, 485. 486, 487, 488, 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510. 511, 512, 513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525, 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, Hourly .Rate 22.0073 22.1174 22, 2279 2}-.3391 22.4508 22,5630 22,6759 22,7892 22.9032 23~0177 23, [328 23,2484 23,3647 23,4815 23.5989 23,7169 23,8355 23,9547 24,0745 24,1948 24,3158 24,4374 24,5596 24.6824 24,8058 24,9298 25,0545 25,1797 25,3056 25,4321 25,5~ 3 25.66/1 25,8155 25.9446 26,0743 26,2047 26,3357 26,4674 26,5998 26,7328 26,8664 27.0007 27. 1358 27,27 14 27.4078 27,5448 27,6826 27,8210 27,9601 28,0999 Bi-Weekly ~ate 1760,5861 1769.3890 1778,2359 1787,1271 1796,0627 180~.0431 181,0683 1823,1386 1832.2543 t841,4155 I850.6227 1859.8258 1869.1752 1878.5210 1887.9136 1897.3532 1906,8400 1916,3742 1925,9560 1935,5858 1945,2637 1954,9901 1964,7650 1974,5888 1984,4618 1994,3841 2004,3560 2014,3778 2024,4497 2034,5719 2044.7448 2054,9685 1065,2434 2075,5696 2085,9474 2096,3772 2106,8590 2117,3933 2127,9803 2138,6202 2149,3133 2160,0599 2170,8602 2181,7145 2192,6230 2203.5862 2214.6041 2225,6771 2236,8055 2247,9895 Monthly ~at.___~_e 3815 3834 3853 3872 389! 391! 3930 3950 3970 3990 4010 4030 4050 4070 4090 4111 4131 4152 4173 4194 4215 4236 4257 4278 4300 4321 4343 4364 4386 4408 4430 4452 4475 4497 4520 4542 4565 4588 4611 4634 4657 4680 4704 4727 4751 ~74 ~6 Ran e 531. 532. 533. 536. 537. 538. 539. 540. 541. 542. 543. 544. 545. 546. 547. 548. 549. 550. 551. 552. 553. 554. 555. 556. 557. 558. 559. 560. 561. 562. 563. 564. 565. 566. 567. 568. 569. 570. 571. 572. 573. 574. 575. 576. 577. 578. 579. 580. Hourly Rate 28.2404 28.3816 28.5235 28.9535 29.0982 29.2437 29.3900 29.5369 29.6846 29.8330 29.9822 30.1321 30.2827 30.4342 30.5863 30.7393 30.8930 31.0474 31.2027 31.3587 31.5155 31.6730 31.8314 31.9906 32.1505 32.3113 32.4728 32.6352 32.7984 32.9624 33.1272 33.2928 33.4593 33.6266 33.7947 33.9637 34.1335 34.3042 34.4757 34.6481 34.8213 34.9954 35.1704 35.3462 35.5230 35.7006 35.8791 36.0585 Bi-Weekly Rate 2259.2295 2270.5256 2281.8783 2293. 2304.~? 2316.2779 2327.8592 2339.4985 2351.1960 2362.9520 2374.7668 2386.6406 2398.5738 2410.5667 2422.6195 2434.7326 2446.9063 2459.1408 2471.4365 2483.7937 2496.2127 2508.6937 2521.2372 2533.8434 2546.5126 2559.2452 2572.0414 2584.9016 2597.8261 2610.8152 2623.8693 2626.9886 2650.1736 2663.4245 2676.7416 2690.1253 2703.5759 2717.0938 2730.6793 2744.3327 2758.0543 2771.8446 2785.7038 2799.6323 2813.6305 2827.6987 2841.8371 2856.0463 2870.3266 2884.6782 Monthly Rate 4895 4919 4944 4969 4994 5019 5044 5069 5094 5120 5145 5171 5197 5223 5249 5275 5302 5328 5355 5382 5408 5436 5463 5490 5517 5545 5573 5601 5629 5657 5685 5713 5742 5771 5800 5829 5858 5887 5916 5946 5976 6006 6036 6066 6096 6127 6157 6188 6219 6250 Ran e ~r 581. 582. 583. 584. 585. 586. 587. 588. 589. 590. 591. 592. 593. 594. 595. 596. 597. 598. 599. 600. 601. 602. 603. 604. 6O5. 606. 607. 6O8. 609. 610. 611. 612. 613. 614. 615. 616. 617. 618. 619. 620. 621. 622. 623. 624. 625. 626. 627. 628. 629. 630. Hourly Rate 36.2388 36.4200 36.6021 36.7851 36.9690 37.1538 37.3396 37.5263 37.7139 37.9025 38.0920 38.2825 38.4739 38.6663 38.8596 39.0539 39.2492 39.4454 39.6426 39.8409 40.0401 .24 3 40.44?5 40 40.6437 40.8469 41.0512 41.2564 41.4627 41.6700 41.8784 42.0878 42.2982 42.5097 42.7222 42.9358 43.1505 43.3663 43.5831 43.8010 44.0200 44.240 44.461 44.683 44.906 45.131 45.357 45.584 45.812 46.041 46.271 Resolution No. 94- Page !5 Bi-Weekly Monthly Rate Rate 2899.1016 6281 2913.5971 6313 2928.1651 6344 2942.8059 6376 2957.5199 6408 2972.3075 6440 2987.1691 6472 3002.1049 6505 3017.1154 6537 3032.2010 6570 3047.3620 6603 3062.5988 6636 3077.9118 6669 3093.3014 6702 3108.7679 6736 3124.3117 6769 3139.9333 6803 3155.6330 6837 3171.4111 6871 3187.2682 6906 3203.2045 6941 3219.2206 6976 3235.3167 7011 3251.4932 7046 3267.7507 7081 3284.0895 7117 3300.5100 7152 3317.0125 7188 3333.5975 7224 3350.2655 7260 3367.0168 7296 3383.8519 7333 3400.7712 7370 3417.7750 7407 3434.8639 7444 3452.0382 7481 3469.2984 7518 3486.6449 7556 3504.0781 7594 3521.5985 7632 3539.206 7670 3556.902 7709 3574.687 7747 3592.560 7786 3610.523 7825 3628.576 7864 3646.719 7903 3664~953 7943 3683.278 7983 3701.694 8023 Resolution No. 94- Page 16 Range Hourly Bi-Weekly Number Rate Rate 631. 46. 502 632. 46.735 633. 46. 969 634. 47. 204 635. 47.440 636. 47.677 637. 47.915 638. 48. 155 639. 48. 396 640. 48.638 641. 48.881 642. 49.125 643. 49.371 644. 49.618 645. 49.866 646. 50.115 647. 50.366 648. 50.618 649. 50.871 650. 51.125 3720.202 3738.803 3757.497 3776.284 3795.165 3814.141 3833.212 3852.378 3871.640 3890.998 3910.453 3930.005 3949.655 3969.403 3989.250 4009.196 4029.242 4049.388 4069.635 4089.983 651. 51.381 4110.433 652. 51.638 4130.985 653. 51.896 4151.640 654. 52.155 4172.400 655. 52.420 4193.262 656. 52.683 4214.230 657. 52.943 4235.301 658. 53.208 4256.478 659. 53.474 4277.760 660. 53.741 4299.150 661. 54.010 4320.646 662. 54.280 4342.249 663. 54.551 4363.906 664. 54.824 4385.780 665. 55.098 4407.709 666. 55.373 4429.748 667. 55.650 4451.897 668. 55.928 4474.156 669. 56.208 4496.527 670. 56.489 4519.010 Monthly Rate 8063 8103 8144 8184 8225 8267 8308 8349 8391 8433 8475 8518 8560 8603 8646 8689 8733 8776 8820 8864 8908 8952 8996 9040 9085 9130 9175 9220 9266 9312 9359 9406 9453 9500 9548 9596 9644 9692 9740 9789 .Range Number 67l. '672. 673. 674. 675. 676. 677. 678. 679. 680. 681. 682. 683. 684. 685. 686. 687. 688. 689. 690. 691. 692. 693. 694. 695. 696. 697. 698. 699. 700. Hourly Rate 56.771 57.055 57.340 57.627 57.915 58.205 58.496 58.788 59.082 59.377 59.674 59.972 60.27? 60.573 60.876 61.180 61.486 61.793 62.102 62.413 62.725 63.039 63.354 63.671 63.989 64.309 64.631 64.954 65.279 65.605 Bi-Weekly Rat__e 4541.605 4564.313 4587.135 4610.071 4633.171 4656.287 4679.568 4702.966 4726.481 4750.113 4773.864 4797.733 4821.722 4845.831 4870.060 4894.410 4918.881 4943.476 4968.193 4993.034 5017.999 5043.089 5068.304 5093.646 5119.114 5144.710 5170.434 5196.286 5222.267 5248.378 Monthly Rate 9838 9887 9936 9986 10,036 10,086 10,137 10,!88 10,239 10,290 10,341 10,393 10,445 10,497 10,550 10,603 10,656 10,709 10,763 10,816 10,870 10,925 10,979 11,034 11,090 11,145 11 ,?0! 11,257 11,313 11,370 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN WILLIAM J. BEARD JR. AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) REC~NDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Instal 1 ation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Will Jam J. Beard Jr. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKG~DUND/AJ~ALYSIS The attached subject Agreement between the City and Beard provides for street improvements which include curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, along the portion of the William J. Beard Jr. parcel. William J. Beard Jr. has agreed to grant to the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements for the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project. City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM WILLIAM j. BEARD JR. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in con.iunctton with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Beard parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, William J. Beard has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. DATE: TO: .FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshl, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN WILLIAM MCKINLEY WALTON JR. AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) RECOeq, ENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between William McKinley Walton Jr. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The attached subject Agreement between the City and Will Jam McKinley Walton Jr. provides for street improvements which include curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, along the portion of the Walton parcel. William McKinley Walton Jr. has agreed to grant to the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements for the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project. Re s p e c t f s u~/~ted~ Wtl 1 iamf.~O'Zeil City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. C2t/~/~(7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM WILLIAM MCKINLEY WALTON JR. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Walton parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, William McKinley Walton Jr. has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 41 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Approval of Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) Memorandum of Understanding for Fiscal Year 1994-1995 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Alta Loma, Central, Etiwanda, and Cucamonga School Districts and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the D.A.R.E. program for fiscal year 1994/95. The MOU reflects an $89,610 joint contribution from the four School Districts with a matching amount of $89,610 from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This activity is budgeted in account number 01-4451-6030. BACKGROUND The D.A.R.E. program was implemented by City Council as a pilot program during fiscal year 1990/91. Initially, the program utilized one Sheriff Deputy for three School Districts which did not provide for all fifth grade classes to receive the program. During fiscal year 1994/95 the City and four School Districts including the Cucamonga School District jointly increased their funding amount to include two DARE Officers to provide the program to all fifth grade classes. The School Districts will jointly contribute $89,610. The City will contribute a matching $89,610 with the balance of $42,800 representing one time DARE reserve funds. The total projected DARE program cost for fiscal year 1994/95 is $222,020. The DARE operational cost will increase next fiscal year since the one time funding will no longer be available. Deputy City Manager Attachments: DARE MOU MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into by the Alta Loma, Central, Etiwanda, and Cucamonga School Districts, along with the County of San Bernardlno, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of jointly sponsoring and COntinuing the Drug Abe Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) program. In order to accomplish this goal the agencies listed below will COntribute the following dollar amounts to be used for the continuation of the DARE program: Alta Loma School District - $35,8~.~.; Central School District - $25J39; Etiwanda School District - $20,610; Cucamonga School District - $7,617; the City of Rancho Cucamonga - $89,610. The County of San Bernardino will provide two DARE offiCOrs in accordance with the terms and provisions of the contract for police service between said County and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be shared between the four school districts on a proportional basis based upon the dollar amount COntributed by each district to the program (Alta Loma School District - 40% of the officer's time; Central School District - 28.5% of the officer's time; Etiwanda School District - 2.3% of the officer's time; and Cucamonga School District - 8.5% of the officer's time. This shall be effective from July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995. If modifications are necessary before or at that time, they will be added to this Memorandum of Understanding by mutual agreement of all parties involved. We hereby agree to this Memorandum of Understanding and certify that the agreements made here will be honored. Signature Alta Loma School District, Superintendent Signature Central School District, Superintendent Signature Etiwanda School District, Superintendent Signature Cucamonga School District, Superintendent Signature City of Rancho Cucamonga, Mayor DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT William j. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT TO RMA GROUP FOR SOILS TESTING OF PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS CITY WIDE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95, TO BE FUNDED FROM THE APPROPRIATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ACCOUNTS AT THE SPECIFIED RATES RECOIelENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of the Professional Service Agreements for Soils Testing of Public Works Design and Construction Projects to RMA Group, Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/AJIALYSIS The above Professional Service Agreement provides for Soils Testing on a variety of the smaller projects ($10,000.00 or less). RMA Group, has had a contract with the City for seven (7) years. They have completed all assigned projects in an acceptable and professional manner. Respectful ly submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:ly Attachment cc: Purchasing Y DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer RECOMMENDATION TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS INCORPORATED AND WAGNER PACIFIC, INCORPORATED, FOR SURVEYING OF PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS CITY WIDE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95, TO BE FUNDED FROM THE APPROPRIATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ACCOUNTS AT THE SPECIFIED RATES RECI311ENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of the Professional Services Agreements for Surveying of Public Works Design and Construction Projects to Associated Engineers, Incorporated, Ontario, California and to Wagner Pacific, Incorporated, Placentia. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The above Professional Services Agreements provide for Surveying on a a variety of the smaller projects ($10,000.00 or less). Associated Engineers, Incorporated, has had a contract with the City for six (6) years and Wagner Pacific, Incorporated, has had a contract with the City for four (4) years. Both companies have completed all assigned projects in an acceptable and professional manner. Respectful ly submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:ly Attachment cc: Purchasing L Y DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT '.- July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer6~ AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR RESURFACING OF TRAFFIC DECK/PARKING STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, TO LADHER COATINGS FOR THE AMOUNT OF $174,312.00 ($158,465.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNDED WITH RDA FUNDS ACCOUNT NO. 17-15000 RECO~ENDATION: It is recon~nended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize execution of contract for Traffic Deck/Parking Structure Improvement Project to the lowest responsive bidder, Ladnet Coatings, for the amount of $158,465.00 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $174,312.00 ($158,465.00 plus 10% contingency} to be funded from RDA Funds Account No. 17-15000. BACK GROU ND/~,NAL Y S I S Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 28, 1994, for the subject project. Ladner Coatings is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of $158,465.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $160,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully ubmitte.~.~ / William j. O~+~eil City Engineer WjO:LRB:sd Attachment L Y DATE: JUNE 28, 1994 Item No. 1. , Item Description Wearing surface coat (including coves) including all under coats, surface preparation and removals, except joint and crack sealing Double-Texturing top coat only ' Clean, prime and Ireat visible hairline cracks 1/16" or less Route, caulk and treat cracks and joints over 1/16" Remove existing caulk, clean and reseal control joints Remove, store and reinsroll concrete wheel stops, including prepration and epoxy adhesive. Stairwell tread wearing surface coat, including all under coats Total Total Submitted CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS RESURFACING OF TRAFIC BEARING DECK/PARKING STRUCTURE ENGINEERS'S ESTIMATE: $160,000.00 Ladner Coatinffs, Inc. Consolidated Wateroroofinff Unit of Estimated Unit Measure Quantity Price Amount Unit Amount Price SF 50,000 $2.66 SF I0,000 $0.45 $133,000.00 $3.20 $160,000.00 $4,500.00 $0.31 $3,100.00 LF 2,000 $0.42 $840.00 $0.76 $1,520.00 LF 2,000 $1.25 $2,500.00 $0.98 $1,960.00 LF 10,000 $1.55 $15,500.00 $1.02 $10,200.00 EA 110 $10.25 $1,127.50 $21.37 $2,350.70 SF 350 $2.85 $997.50 $3.82 $1,337.00 $158,465.00 $180,467.70 $180,735.00 Western Walerproo~ng, Inc. Unit Amoun $3.30 $165,000.00 $0.44 $4,400.00 $O.80 $1,600.00 $2.10 $4,200.00 $1.30 $13,000.00 $41.00 $4,510.00 $1,400.00 $194,110.00 , DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager Jan Reynolds, Assistant Redevelopment Analyst APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 6 (CO 92- 064) TO THE LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INCORPORATED WHICH DESCRIBES THE TERMS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH PARTY FOR THE LEFT HELD SCOREBOARD. RECOMMF-NDATION Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 6 to the lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Incorporated. BACKGROUNDIANAI .YSIS The attached amendment acknowledges the Tenant's modification of the left field scoreboard at the Adults Sports Complex Stadium as depicted in Exhibit "A', and establishes the maintenance, operation, and ownership of said scoreboard. The amendment defines installation, maintenance, operation and repair of the left field scoreboard as the sole cost and responsibility of the Tenant. The City has vested title to this scoreboard at the conclusion of the lease. This amendment pertains only to those items specifically relating to the left field scoreboard. No other amendments to the lease are proposed at this time. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager [~xhl'b~'~r "A" Amcn~mcn.t-' No. ~ ADVERTISINC PANEL .I FACE VIEIr + '1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I FOR 6, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET, SUBMITTED BY SHEPHERD OF THE HILLS LUTHERAN CHURCH RECO~I~ENDATION It is reconxnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND CUP 93-17, located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street in the Very Low Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission on December B, 1993, to add 4,586 square feet of library and classroom space to an existing multi-purpose building of an existing church facility. The Developer, Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-si te improvements in the foll owing amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $12,833.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 6,467.00 Copies of the agreement and security and the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J; O'Ne~ City Engineer WJO:BRH:sd Attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 93-17 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on July 20, 1994, by Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to as CUP 93-17; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. 51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 93-17 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article ~ of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3E~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 (LeaseJ {~v-c, vM, A4WIO) /JrPN ZO /' e'g-l- /,OZ Ac 8 t~ /V Y Ar N sT, · I .e e TI~AIL- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA /'~~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO {, STATE OF CALIFORNIA cup ~3-17 STREET LIGHTS: Di st. 5800L 9500L S1 S6 2' EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: CUP 93-17 NUMBER OF LAMPS 16,000L 22,000L 1' 27,500L LANDSCAPING: Dist. L3B Community Equest. Trail D .G .S .F. 2040 Turf Non-Turf S.F. S.F. Trees Ea. 16' ASSESSMENT UNITS: Parcel Acres N/A 1.02 Assessment Units By District S1 S6 L3B 2.04 1.02 1.07 * Existing items installed with original project. This approval only aade~ the trail D.G. Form Date 2/18/93 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supv. Public Works Inspector ACCEPT THE HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT, FROM CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 93-031. AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION RECOI~NDATION: It is recommended that City Council accept the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Project, from Civic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 93-031, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount $312,520.15 to be used as the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount $32,949.9.5 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $312,520.15 30 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $329,499.48. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $329,499.48 which include three contract change orders for recovery of cost for a Cal trans permi t, placement of advisory signs, construction of a pedestrian push button at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue and construction of additional inductive loops. City Engineer WJO:MDL:sd Attachment L Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT, FROM CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 93-031, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Project, from Civic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 93-031, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work compl ere. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: July 20, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Board Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager/Executive Director Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner ACCEPT THE CHAFFEY-GARCIA BARN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CONTRACT CO 93-071 AND RA CO 93-004, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE BONDS, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" R~CON~DATION Staff reco~nends that the Agency Board accept the Chaffey-Garcia Barn construction project as complete, authorize the Redevelopment Agency Manager to file a "Notice of Completion," authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $144,845.00 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $144,845.00, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claim have been received. Staff also recomends that the City and the Agency Board authorize the City Manager and Executive Director to release the project retention in the amount of $13,147.00. The construction project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City and the Agency. The final contract amount totals $144,845.00. BB: SM: sp Attachments: Notice of Completion Resolution Accepting Public Improvements for Notice of Completion RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 91729 NOTICE OF COMPLETION 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property the nature of which interest or estate is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 3. On July 6, 1994, there was completed in the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: CHAFFEY-GARCIA BARN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CO 93-071 AND RA CO 93-004 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: OLD HICKORY CONSTRUCTION 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: The street address of the said property is 7150 Etiwanda Avenue. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Date Jack Lam, AICP Executive Director/Secretary Redevelopment Agency Date Jack Lam, AICP City Manager/Secretary City Council A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE CHAFFEY-GARCIA BARN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CO 93-071 , AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the completion of the Chaffey-Garcia Barn Construction project have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the work is hereby accepted and the City Manager is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 59 ORDINANCE NOo 526 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT '94-01, FOR THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEMIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 209-272-01, 04, 07, AND 08; 210- 081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26. A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: (a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and co~nitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. (b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs of development." (ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Any city . . . may enter into a Development Agreement with any person h~ving a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article . . ." (iii) follows: California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as "A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maxim height and size or proposed buildings, and provision for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The Development Agreement may include conditions, terM, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement . . ." CITY COUNCIL ORDINanCE NO. DA 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT July 6, 1994 Page 2 (iv) "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated heroin by this reference, is proposed Development Agreement 94-01, concerning that property located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street, and as legally described in the attached Development Agreement. Heroinafter in this Ordinance, the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the "Development Agreement." (v) Prior to this Ordinance approving this Development Agreement, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 525 approving Specific Plan 93-01. (vi) On May 25, 1994, the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date and reco~nended approval through adoption of its Resolution 94-39. (vii) On July 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement. (viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan 94-01 and the Development Agreement, and certified the Report, including adoption of a Statement' of Overriding Considerations, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amendad, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-referenced public hearings on May 25 and July 6, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The location, design, and proposed uses set forth in this Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity. (b) The Development Agreement conform t~ the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 61 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DA 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT JUly 6, 1994 Page 3 SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement. SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement 94-01, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published with 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (Space above for Recorder,s Use Only) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Between THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA and GENEP, AL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation Dated: , 1994 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION CONCERNING SUB-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN This Development Agreement is entered into this day of , 1994, by and between General Dynamics ' Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("GD") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (City,,) pursuant to the authority of Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code. GD and its successors and assigns are referred to collectively hereinafter as the "Property Owner.,, RECITALS: A. To provide more certainty in the approval of development projects, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California has adopted Sections 65864, et seq. of the California Government Code authorizing City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property in order to establish development rights with respect thereto. B. The City adopted Resolution No. 18-40 on April 6, 1981 pursuant to which it adopted the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (as amended prior to the date of this Development Agreement, the "General Plan"). Pursuant to Resolution No. 81-128 approved on August 19, 1981 and Ordinance No. 297 approved on September 17, 1986, the' City adopted the Industrial Area Specific Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (as amended prior to the date of this Development Agreement, the "IASP,,). The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamon~a ("RDA") approved the Rancho Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 by adopting Ordinance No. 316A on August 6, 1987 (as amended prior to the date of this Development Agreement, the "Redevelopment Plan"). C. Property.Owner owns fee title to approximately 380 acres of real property located entirely within the City and more completely described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Project Site"). Property Owner has applied to City for the approval of a Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan (the "Sub- Area 18 Specific Plan"), certain conforming amendments to the General Plan and the IASP, and approval of a tentative parcel map as described in Section 2.C.1 below (collectively, the "Specific Plan Entitlements,,). The Specific Plan Entitlements were approved by the City pursuant to Resolution No. and No. and Ordinance No. In accordance with the rules~ regulations and policies of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's Guidelines for Implementing CEQA, the City has certified a Program EIR in connection with the Specific Plan Entitlements (the "EIR") as being accurate, adequate and complete in the environmental evaluation of the impacts associated with the Project and 5he implementation of this Development Agreement. D. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan contemplates a mixed-use development composed of a series of large anchor parcels surrounding an 18-hole golf course. In addition to the golf course, some of the principal features of the Sub- Area 18 Specific Plan include: a re-use program for the three existing buildings located on approximately 75 acres of the Project Site north of 4th Street and east of Utica Street (including potential development of associated parking facilities); adaptive recreational, co~ercial, and office uses; and the proposed site for a Metrolink station. The principal goals and objectives of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan are identified in detail in Specific Plan Entitlements, and include permitting gre~ter planning flexibility and encouraging more creative and imaginative designs; providing a process for initiation, review, and regulation of the project area that affords the maximum flexibility to the property owner within the context of an overall development program and phased subdivisions, coordinated with the provision of necessary public services and facilities; and promoting a more marketable commercial fochs and enhancing the potential to create jobs and revenue. The development of the Project Site pursuant to the terms of the Specific Plan Entitlements is referred to hereinafter as the "Project". E. This Development Agreement will enable City to realize significant financial, recreational, commercial and regional benefits and facilities. The development of the Project at the earliest practicable date will contribute toward the generation of City revenues and benefits and enhance the quality of life of present and future residents of the City. F. Property Owner and City hereby desire to provide for the development of the Project Site pursuant to the rules, regulations, policies and provisions described further herein. G. As further set forth in [describe Ordinance] adopted by City on ,1994, the execution of this Development Agreement and the performance of and compliance with the terms and conditions set forth herein by the parties hereto: (i) is in the best interest in the City; (ii) will promote the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices in the City; (iii) will promote preservation of land values; (iv) will promote the policies and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and encourage the development of the Project by providing a level of certainty to the Property Owner; (v) will provide for orderly growth and development of the City consistent with the City's General Plan; and (vi) is consistent with the General Plan, the IASP, and the Specific Plan Entitlements. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, and the mutual promises and covenants of the parties herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Term The term of this Development Agreement shall co~,~ence on the effective date of the adopting Ordinance approving this Development Agreement and shall extend for a period of twenty (20) years thereafter, unless this Development Agreement is terminated, modified or extended by cir.cumstances set forth in this Development Agreement (including, without limitation, the extensions provided below and any extension attributable to the "force majeure,, circumstances described in Section 2.C.5 below) or by mutual consent of the parties hereto. Following the expiration of the term, this Development Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect; provided, however, that such termination shall not automatically affect any right or duty arising from project entitlements granted prior to, concurrently with, or subsequent to the approval of this Development Agreement. B. Assignment. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Property Owner shall have the right to convey, assign, sell, lease, sublease, encumber, hypothecate or otherwise transfer (for purposes of this Section 1B, "transfer,,) the Project Site in whole or in part, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Development Agreement. Upon the express assumption of any or all of the obligations of Property Owner under this Development Agreement by such purchaser or transferee of the Project Site or any portion thereof, Property Owner shall be relieved of its legal duty to perform said obligations under this Development Agreement at the time of assignment, except to the extent Property Owner is in Default of any of the terms of this Development Agreement when the property is sold or transferred. If one or more of such parcels comprising the Project Site are sold or transferred and there is noncompliance by the transferee owner with respect to the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement (to the extent such terms and conditions have been expressly assumed by such transferee), or by the transferor with respect to any portion of the Project not sold or transferred, such noncompliance shall be deemed a breach of this Agreement by that transferee or transferor as applicable, but shall not be deemed to be a breach hereunder a~ain~t other persons then owning or holding any interest xn any other portion of the Project and not themselves in breach hereunder. Any alleged default shall be governed by the provisions of Section 3 below. In no event shall the reservation or dedication of a part or parts of the Project Site to a public agency cause a transfer of duties and obligations hereunder to such public agency unless specifically stated to be the case in this Development Agreement, any of the exhibits attached hereto, the instrument of conveyance used for such reservation or dedication, or other form of agreement with such public agency. C. ~mendment of Agreement. This Development Agreement may be mended from time to time by mutual consent of the parties in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Notwithstanding anything stated to the contrary herein, the parties may enter into one or more implementing agreements, in accordance with the following paragraph, to clarify the intended application or interpretation of the Development Agreement. Property Owner and City acknowledge that the provisions of this Development Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between Property Owner and City, and that in the course of implementing the Project it may be necessary to supplement this Development Agreement to address the details of the parties' performance and to otherwise effectuate the purpose of this Development Agreement and the intent of the parties with respect thereto. If and when, from time to time, the parties find that it is necessary or appropriate to clarify the application or interpretation of this Development Agreement without amending any of the Development Agreement's material terms, the parties may do so through an implementing agreement, which, after execution, shall be attached hereto as addenda and become a part hereof, and may be further changed or supplemented from time to time as necessary. Such implementing agreements shall only be executed by the Community Development Director (on behalf of the City) if the Community Development Director has determined that such implementing agreements are not materially inconsistent with this Development Agreement, the Specific Plan Entitlements, and the ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies in force at the time of execution of this Development Agreement. Any changes to this Agreement which would impose additional obligations on the City beyond those which would be deemed to arise under a reasonable interpretation of this Agreement, or would purport to change land use designations applicable to the Project Site under the Specific Plan Entitlements will be considered "material" and require a formal amendment of this Agreement. Section 2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. A. Land Use Entitlements. During the term of this Development Agreement, the permitted uses for the Project, or any portion thereof, the density and intensity of use, zoning, maximum height and size of proposed buildings, building and yard setback requirements, provisions for reservations or dedications, design and performance standards and other terms and conditions of development of the Project shall be those set forth in the Specific Plan Entitlements and any other applicable Project Entitlements (as hereinafter defined). Pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Specific Plan, Property Owner may apply from time to time for the approval of a master plan ("Master Plan") with respect to each Planning Area comprising the Project Site. Upon approval of such Master Plan, the Property Owner with respect to such Planning Area shall have the right to proceed with development in accordance with such Master Plan approval and shall be legally vested with respect to all land use designations, design and performance standards, provisions for dedications and reservations and other terms and conditions of development contained therein ("Master Plan Entitlements") for a period of five (5) years following such approval. On the date of the Annual Review following such 5-year term, upon application by the Property Owner of such Planning Area, the Community Development Director shall determine whether the vesting of Master Plan Entitlements for the Planning Area should continue for an additional 5- year period. Such determination shall be based upon the reasonable progress of development within the applicable Planning Area during the preceding 5-year period and the reasonable viability of the Master Plan for such Planning Area. Any decision by the Community Development Director not to extend the Master Plan Entitlements shall be appealable, in the first instance, to the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 17.02.080 A of the City Development Code, subject to further appeal to the City Council pursuant to Section 17.02,080B. The failure to extend such Master Plan Entitlemerits shall not in any way affect the other rights of the Property Owner vested under this Development Agreement and shall not affect any Project Entitlements applicable to any other Planning Area. Upon approval of each Development/Design Review application for any individual construction project within a Planning Area, all development plans approved in connection with such application shall be legally vested for a period of five (5) years thereafter, and the Property Owner with respect to such approved Development/Design Review shall be entitled to-proceed with development on the basis thereof (the "Development/Design Review Entitlements"). The expiration of such Development/Design Review Entitlements shall not in any way affect the other Project Entitlements vested hereunder, including the Specific Plan Entitlements and Master Plan Entitlements applicable to the parcel in question, and any Project Entitlements, including any Development/Design Review Entitlements, applicable to any other parcel within the Project Site. The Specific Plan Entitlements, the Master Plan Entitlements, and the Development/Design Review Entitlements, along with all other rights vested under this Development Agreement are referred to hereinafter as the "Project Entitlements." In consideration of this Development Agreement, Property Owner has agreed to pay or provide to City the fees, charges, public benefit payments, mitigations, improvements, dedications, reservations and other benefits expressly provided for and set forth in the Specific Plan Entitlements (collectively, "Exactions,,), which Exactions are set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto (provided that, in the event. of any conflict between Exhibit "B" and the terms of the Specific Plan Entitlements, the Specific Plan Entitlements shall control). Other than the Exactions, the phased infrastructure improvements described in Exhibit C, and the Fees described in Exhibit D, City shall not impose or require any additional fees, charges, public benefit or facility payments, mitigations, improvements, dedications, reservations or benefits for development or construction of the Project, except as expressly permitted under this Section 2, of as may be required by applicable state or federal law. B. Rules and Regulations. Pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code Section 65866, except as otherwise explicitly provided in this Development Agreement, the ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Project Site, the density and intensity of such uses, and design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the Project, shall be those ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies and General Plan and IASP provisions in force at the time,of execution of this Development Agreement, including but not limited to the zoning adopted pursuant to the Specific Plan Entitlements ("Existing Laws"). City shall not be prevented in subsequent actions applicable to the Project, from applying new ordinances, rules, regulations, policies and General and Specific Plan provisions then in effect ("Future Policies") which do not conflict with the Existing Laws, the Project Entitlements, or the express provisions of this Development Agreement. Such conflict shall be deemed to occur if, without limitation, such Future Policies: (i) modify the permitted types of land uses, the density or intensity of use, the maxim height or size of proposed buildings on the Property, building and yard setback requirements, or impose requirements for the construction or provision of on-site or off-site improvements or the reservation or dedication of land for public use, or the payment of fees or the imposition of exactions, other than as are in each case specifically provided for in this Development Agreement; (ii) prevent the Property Owner from obtaining all necessary approvals, permits, certificates or other entitlements at such dates and under such circumstances as the Property Owner would otherwise be entitled under this Development Agreement; (iii) prevent or inhibit Property Owner from commencing, prosecuting and finishing on a timely basis the construction and development of the Project or the satisfaction of Property Owner's obligations hereunder in the manner and as contemplated by this Development Agreement. C. Timing of Development. 1. Development of the Golf Course. GD has applied to City for the approval of a parcel map subdividing the Project Site into the Planning Areas identified in the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan (the "Phase I Subdivision") providing for certain improvements necessary to operate the Golf Course (as defined in paragraph 2.C.3 below), and deferring improvements on the remainder of the Project Site until individual Planning Areas are ready to be developed as contemplated in paragraph 2.C.2 below. In consideration of the rights afforded it under this Development Agreement, Property Owner agrees that it will apply to City for the approval of grading and building permits necessary to develop an 18-hole championship quality golf course within Planning Areas IA and IB (the "Golf Course") within 12 mon[hs after recordation of a final parcel map with respect to the Phase I Subdivision. No Development/Design Review shall be required with respect to the Golf Course. Upon receipt of all necessary grading and building permits, Property Owner agrees to proceed diligently with the construction of the Golf Course and shall us.e its best reasonable efforts to complete construction of the Golf Course, including, without limitation, all improvements with respect thereto identified in the Phase I Subdivision, within 24 months after all applicable permits for construction have been issued. The periods for proceeding with development and construction of the Golf Course are subject to extension due to force majeure events as described in Section 2.C.5 below. 2. Development of Remainder of Project Site. Neither Property Owner nor City can presently predict when or the rate at which phases of the Project Site will be developed, since such decisions depend upon numerous factors which are not within the control of .Property Owner, including but not limited to market orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, competition, and other factors. 71 The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that Property Owner retains flexibility hereunder to develop the Property in such order and at such rate and times as are appropriate within the exercise of the Property Owner,s business judgment. The City further acknowledges that GD may desire to market, sell, or otherwise arrange for disposition of some or all of the Planning Areas (including the Golf Course) comprising the Project Site, in whole or in part prior to development, and that the rate at which the Project develops will likely depend upon the business judgement of subsequent owners of the Project Site. 3. Infrastructure Phasing. The principal infrastructure associated with the development of the Project is identified in Exhibit C attached hereto (the "Principal Infrastructure,,). The Principal Infrastructure will be constructed in phases as individual Planning Areas are developed or reused as referenced under recitals paragraph D. The phasing of the Principal Infrastructure is described further in Exhibit C. 4. City's Cooperation. The City shall use its best good faith efforts to process and take final action on Property 0wner's applications for land use permits and approvals within the time periods set forth in the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan. Such cooperation shall include, without limitation, using its reasonable efforts to process subsequent Development/Design Review projects in accordance with the time periods set forth in the following paragraph; completing any required environmental review in accordance with Section 2E below as soon as reasonably possible; in instances where a Property Owner is applying for concurrent land use approvals, including, subdivision, master plan, or Development/Design Review, carefully coordinating and streamlining all applicable filing and submission requirements, committee meetings, review processes, and hearings to avoid duplication and delays to the greatest extent practicable; and promptly processing all Non- Discretionary Permits in accordance with Section 2G below. Any future regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of development of the Project Site or the extent thereof shall be deemed to conflict with the rights to development of the Project hereunder and shall to that extent not be applicable to the development of the Property. City agrees to use its reasonable efforts to process all Development/Design Review Projects within Sub- Area 18 to be approved by the City Planner in accordance with the following schedule: (1) As soon as reasonably possible, but in any event within thirty (30) days-of the submission of an application for Development/Design Review, the Community Development Department shall advise the applicant in writing of any additional information which needs to be provided in order to consider such application complete. If, after resubmittal by the applicant, additional information is still needed, the Community Development Department shall so notify the applicant within ten (10) days of such resubmission; provided, however, that such 10-day period shall not apply in the event required soils and drainage reports are not included in the initial submission, and such period shall not shorten the thirty (30) day period for reviewing the initial submission application. (2) In the event no further environmental review document is required, co~u~ittee reviews and staff reports shall be completed fifteen (15) days after the date the application is deemed complete in accordance with paragraph (1) above (or, in the event the application is deemed complete prior to the initial 30-day period, within 45 days after initial submission of the application). (3) In the event that no further environmental documentation is required as provided above, the City Planner shall make a final decision on the application'within thirty (30) days after the application is deemed complete in accordance with paragraph (1) above (or if the application is deemed complete prior to the expiration of the first thirty (30) days after submission, within sixty (60) days after initial submission of the application). 5. Force Maj eure. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Development Agreement, Property Owner and City shall be excused from performance of their obligations hereunder during any period of delay caused by acts of God or civil coa~tion, riots, strikes, picketing, or other labor disputes, shortage of materials or supplies, or damage to or prevention of work by reason of fire, floods, earthquake, or other casualties, litigation, acts or neglect of the other party, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the City or Property Owner, as applicable. The time of performance of such obligations as well as the term of this Development Agreement shall automatically be extended by the period of such delay hereunder. D. Future Entitlements. City shall retain its discretionary review authority with respect to future entitlements for development of the Project, including, but not limited to, to the extent applicable, tentative tract and parcel map approvals, Master Plan approvals, conditional use permits, and Development/Design Review. However, any such discretionary review shall be expressly subject to the provisions of this Development Agreement, and City may only impose conditions upon such discretionary entitlements which are consistent with the Project Entitlements, and the terms of this Development Agreement, except as otherwise specifically required by state or federal law. E. Environmental Review. Other than the mitigation measures and conditions of approval set forth in the EIR and the Specific Plan Entitlements (and any additional future mitigation programs contemplated therein), no other mitigation measures for environmental impacts created by the Project, as presently approved and as addressed by the EIR, appear to be necessary. The EIR was prepared and certified as a Program EIR within the meaning of 14 Cal. Admin. Code § 15168, and is intended to analyze and cover the Project as a whole. In connection with City's issuance of any discretionary permit or approval which is subject to CEQA, City shall promptly cor~unence and diligently process any and all initial studies and assessments required by CEQA, and to the extent permitted by CEQA, the City shall use and adopt the EIR and other existing environmental reports and studies as adequately.addressing the environmental impacts of such matter or matters without requiring new or supplemental environmental documentation. In the event CEQA requires any additional environmental review, the City may impose additional measures (or conditions) to mitigate as permitted by law the adverse environmental impacts of such discretionary entitlements which were not considered at the time of approval of the Project; provided, however, that: (i) Unless required by state or federal law, no new or additional mitigation measures shall be imposed as a result of any Future Policies; and (ii) City agrees and acknowledges that the traffic impact analysis ("TIA") incorporated in the EIR has fully analyzed the traffic projected to be generated from the Project, and, in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including, without limitation, the TIA Guidelines set forth in the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan ("CMP"), a total of 45,200 trips may be generated prior to the year 2010 without the necessity of preparing a.new TIA. In the event and at such time as the PrOject generates more than 45,200 vehicle trips, the City may require a new TIA in accordance with such CMP standards as may exist at such time. Except in such event (and except for such traffic circulation/site-access analysis as may be reasonably required to determine the configuration and alignment of streets adjacent or internal to the Project), no further TIA's shall be required by the City with respect to implementation of the Project. The EIR, which has been certified as a Program EIR under CEQA, ~lso satisfies the requirements of a Master EIR under Section 21157 of the Public Resources Code. Because the distinctions between a Program EIR and a Master EIR remain unclear pending adoption of revised State Guidelines for implementing CEQA, Property Owner has reserved the right to request City to adopt such additional resolutions and findings concerning the status of the EIR as a Master EIR if subsequent legal requirements make such designation advisable or desirable in implementing the intent of this Development Agreement. City agrees to fully cooperate with Property Owner in complying with such request, and will do so unless prohibited by applicable state or federal law. City Fees and Mandates by State or Federal Laws. The parties acknowledge and agree that the fees and impositions which may potentially be imposed by City on the Project and Property Owner fall within one of three categories (collectively, "Fees"): (a) fees for processing land use and building applications which are not otherwise governed by the provisions of Section 66000 of the Government Code (but which are subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 66013, 66014 and 66016-66018.5 of the Government Code) (the "Processing Fees"); (b) fees or other monetary exactions which are contemplated under ordinances or resolutions in effect as of the date of this Development Agreement and which purport to defray all or a portion of the cost of impacts to certain public facilities, improvements and other amenities from development projects, including any fees described in Government Code Sections 66000 et. seq. (collectively, the "Existing Fee Categories") (the Existing Fee Categories include any increases, decreases, or other modifications to existing fees, so long as such modified fees relate to the same category of impacts identified in the Existing Fee Categories); and (c) fees or other monetary exactions which may be imposed in the future by the City for purposes of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities, improvements, or amenities related to development projects, but excluding the Existing Fee Categories ("Other Fees.,). The Property Owner's obligation to pay Fees shall be specifically governed by the following provisions: 1. Processing Fees. The City may charge Processing Fees which are in force and effect on a City-wide basis at the time of a Property Owner's application for a land use or building permit or approval. The amount of any Processing Fees shall be determined by the City in accordance with all applicable laws, including Government Code Sections 66013, 66014 and 66017-66018.5 (or any successor laws, as applicable). Unless otherwise agreed by Property Owner and City, the Processing Fees assessed Property Owner shall be the same as those imposed upon other development projects throughout the City. 2. Existing Fee Categories. Exhibit D attached hereto contains a description of each of the Existing Fee Categories and the Property Owner's obligations with respect thereto. Other than the obligations set forth in Exhibit D, neither Property Owner nor the Project shall be subject to any additional City-imposed fees, impositions or monetary exactions with respect to any Existing Fee Categories for a period of five (5) years following the date of this Agreement. No fees in respect of Existing Fee Categories shall be charged or assessed at any raa~_~ against the Golf Course, the golf practice/training facilities and all golf-related improvements to be located within Planning Area III, or any improvements to be constructed thereon, including, without limitation, the clubhouse, maintenance building, practice facility structure, and any other golf- related facilities; provided, however, that in the event Property Owner seeks to expand the clubhouse initially constructed on the Golf Course in a manner which would, but for this Agreement, result in the imposition of a fee in respect of an Existing Fee Category, or, after initial construction of the Golf Course and related improvements, Property Owner seeks to construct a separate structure for restaurant or other public-serving uses unrelated to Golf Course maintenance or operation, then such activities shall be subject to fees in respect of Existing Fee Categories as otherwise provided in this Agreement. Additionally, from and after the date Property Owner receives Development/Design Review approval for a construction project, to the extent any fees, impositions, or monetary exactions with respect to any Existing Fee Categories are not otherwise fixed pursuant to this Section 2.F.2, for a period of five years after the date of such Development/Design Review approval, such fees shall be those adopted by the City as of the date of such Development/Design Review approval. The period during which fees are limited as described in this paragraph (and as further applied in paragraph 3 below) is referred hereinafter as the "Fee Limitation Period." 3. Other Fees. In consideration of the Exactions and Property Owner's agreement to cause the development of the Golf Course in accordance with the terms set forth above, no Other Fees shall be imposed upon Property Owner or the Project during the applicable Fee Limitation Period, except as may be specifically required to carry out any new state or federal law or mandate, or as necessary to mitigate environmental impacts of the project in accordance with Section 2E above. In such event, any such Other Fees shall be limited to Property Owner's fair share contribution to impacts created by the Project, shall not discriminate against the Property Owner (as compared to other property owners in the City), and shall not duplicate any Exactions or other mitigations or fees contributed or paid by Property Owner or the Project. G. Non-Discretionary Permits. The parties acknowledge that in the course of implementing the Project, Property Owner will, from time to time, apply to City for. various non-discretionary permits, licenses, consents, certificates, and approvals, including, without limitation, non-discretionary suDdivision approvals, grading permits, building permits, certificates of occupancy, and any permits necessary to connect the Project to utility systems under the City's jurisdiction (collectively, the "Non-Discretionary Permits"). Property Owner shall have the right to apply for any such Non-Discretionary Permits in accordance with the Existing Laws (and any applicable Future Policies pursuant to Section 2B). City shall issue to Property Owner, upon such applications, all necessary Non-Discretionary Permits, subject to compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the City's Existing Laws (and any applicable Future Policies pursuant to Section 2B) and payment of City's usual and customary fees and charges for such applications and Non-Discretionary Permits (subject to the provisions of Section F.1 above). City further agrees that upon its approval of any plans, specifications, design drawings, maps, or other submittals of Property Owner in connection with such Non-Discretionary Permits (the "Approved Plans"), all further entitlements, approvals, and consents required from City to implement the Project which are consistent with and further implement such Approved Plans shall be expeditiously processed and approved by City in accordance with this Agreement. Property Owner shall be entitled to rely upon such Approved Plans in constructing, developing, and implementing the Project, and City shall not, within two (2] years of their approval require Property Owner to modify or amend any such Approved Plans unless, and only to the extent, the conditions pursuant to which the Project will be implemented have materially changed subsequent to the approval of such Approved Plans in a manner which requires modifications in order to mitigate specifically identified threats to the public health and safety, or such changes arising out of an error or omission by the Property Owner. H. Cooperation. 1. Cooperation With Other Public Agencies. City hereby acknowledges that Property Owner may apply from time to time for permits and approvals as may be required by other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Project in connection with the development of, or provision of services to, the Project, including, without limitation, approvals in connection with developing and implementing a tertiary water system, potential transportation improvements, and other on- site and off-site infrastructure. City shall cooperate with Property Owner in its efforts to obtain such permits and approvals from such agencies (including, without limitation, the Cucamonga County Water District, Chino Basin Municipal Water District, the Municipal Water District, and the City of Ontario), and shall provide any documents or certificates reasonably required to process and obtain such permits and approvals. Such cooperation may specifically include assisting Property Owner in obtaining certain permits from the City of Ontario in connection with the potential discharge of surface water to drainage improvements to be located along 4th Street south of the Project Site. 2. Construction of Off-Site Improvements. To the extent that Property Owner is required to construct any off-site improvements as a condition to developing the Project. The Property Owner shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if it should fail to do so, the Property Owner shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final subdivision map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Property Owner of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Property Owner, at Property Owner cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. To the extent that such off- site improvements, or the construction of any substantial infrastructure on-site, substantially benefit other property owners within the IASP or other portions of the City, City agrees to reasonably assist Property Owner in obtaining reimbursement or other fair share contribution by such other benefitted property owners. Such assistance my include, without limitation, conditioning the approval of development projects proposed by such benefitted property owners upon such owners, contribution on a fair share, pro-rata basis to the construction costs of such improvements. City ~Pecifically agrees that with respect to the infrastructure improvements identified in Exhibit C attached hereto which are adjacent to and benefit other properties (whether such properties are undeveloped or developed), any further discretionary approvals sought by such property owners shall be conditioned to require fair share reimbursement to Property Owner for construction and related costs incurred in providing such improvements. 3. Public Financing. The parties hereby acknowledge that substantial public improvements must be constructed in order to develop the Golf Course and the reminder of the Project Site and that public financing of substantial portion of improvements will.be crit=cal to the economic viab~h~se applicable le PP le law and complying w~h all gal Procedures and requirements, City agrees to cooperate with and assist Property Owner to the fullest extent possible in developing and implementing a public financing plan for the construction of the public infrastructure improvements described in Exhibit C hereto. The implementation of such plan my include, without limitation, the formation of one or more assessment districts or Mello-Roos community facilities districts, or other debt securities necessary to implement such plan. All formation costs shall be borne by the Property Owner. Section 3. ANNUAL REVIEW. A. Good Faith Compliance. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65865.1, City shall, once every twelve (12) months during the term of this Development Agreement, review the extent of good faith substantial compliance by Property Owner with the terms of this Development Agreement; provided, however, that it is intended that this review shall apply to the Project Site as a whole, as opposed to each individual Property Owner who may own a parcel comprising the Project Site. In connection with such annual review, the Property Owner shall provide such information as may be reasonably requested by the City in order to determine whether any provisions of this Agreement have been breached by such Property Owner. If at any time prior to the review period there is an issue concerning a Property Owner's compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement, the provisions of this Section 3 will apply. B. Certificate of Compliance. If the Property Owner is found to be in compliance with this Development Agreement after annual review, the Community Development Director shall, upon written request by the Property Owner, issue a certificate of compliance ("Certificate of Compliance") to the Property Owner stating that based upon information known to the City, the Development Agreement remains in effect and the Property Owner is not in default. The Certificate of Compliance shall be in recordable form and shall contain such information as shall impart constructive record notice of compliance. The Property Owner may record the Certificate of Compliance in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino. C. Finding of Default. If, upon completion of the annual review, the Community Development Director intends to find that the Property Owner has not complied in good faith with the material terms of this Development Agreement ("Default"), he shall first give written notice to such effect to the Property Owner. The notice shall be accompanied by copies of all staff reports, staff recommendations and other information concerning the Property Owner's compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement as City may possess which is relevant to determining Property Owner's performance under this Agreement. The notice shall specify in detail the grounds and all facts demonstrating such noncompliance, so that the Property Owner may address the issues raised on a point-by-point basis. Property Owner shall have twenty (20) days after its receipt of such notice to file a written response with. the Community Development Director. Within 10 days after the expiration of such 20- day response period, the Community Development Director shall notify Property Owner whether Property Owner is deemed to be in Default under this Agreement ("Notice of Default"). Such Notice of Default shall specify the instances in which the Property Owner has failed to comply with the Development Agreement and the terms under which compliance can be obtained. The Notice of Default shall also specify a reasonable time for the Property Owner to meet the terms of compliance, which time shall not be less than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice of Default and shall be reasonably related to the time necessary to bring the Property Owner's performance into good faith compliance. D. Right to Appeal. Upon receipt of a Notice of Default, Property Owner may appeal the Community Development Director's decision directly to the City Council. Such appeal shall be initiated by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days following Property Owner's receipt of the Notice of Default. The hearing on such appeal shall be scheduled in accordance with Section 17.02.080 of the City Development Code. =At the hearing, the Property Owner shall be entitled to submit evidence and to address all of the issues raised by the Notice of Default. If, after considering all of the evidence presented at the hearing, the City Council finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence that the Property Owner is in Default, then the City Council shall specify in writing to the Property Owner the instances in which the Property Owner has' failed to comply and the terms under which compliance can be obtained, and shall also specify a reasonable time for the Property Owner to meet the terms of compliance, which time shall not be less than thirty (30) days from the date of such notice and shall be reasonably related to the time necessary to bring the Property Owner's performance into good faith compliance. E. Property Owner's Cure Rights. If Property Owner is in Default under this Development Agreement, it shall have a reasonable period of time to cure such Default before action is ~aken by City to terminate this Agreement or otherwise amend or limit Property Owner's rights hereunder. In no event shall such 81 cure period be less than the time set forth in the finding of Default made pursuant to Sections 3C or 3D (as applicable) above or less than the time reasonably necessary to cure such default. Any such cure period shall extended by the force majeure circumstances described in Section 2C above. Section 4. ENFORCEMENT. A. Enforceable by Either Party. Subject to all requirements mandated by applicable state or federal or other law, this Development Agreement shall be enforceable by any party hereto. B. Cumulative Remedies. In addition to any other rights or remedies, any party may institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default (to the extent otherwise permitted herein and in Government Code Section 65864 et seq. or any successor laws and regulations), to enforce any covenant or agreement herein, or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation, including suits for declaratory relief, specific performance, and relief in the nature of mandamus. All of the remedies described above shall be cumulative and not exclusive of one another, and the exercise of any one or more of the remedies shall not constitute a waiver or election with respect to any other available remedy. The provisions of this Section 4B are not intended to modify other provisions of this Development Agreement and are not intended to provide additional remedies not otherwise permitted by law. C. Attorneys' Fees. In any legal proceedings brought by either party to enforce any covenant or any of such party's rights or remedies under this Development Agreement, including any action for declaratory or equitable relief, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and all reasonable costs, expenses and disbursements in connection with such action. Any such attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred by either party in enforcing a judgment in its favor under this Development Agreement shall be recoverable separately from and in addition to any other amount included in such judgment, and such attorneys' fees obligation is intended to be severable from the other provisions of this Development Agreement and to survive and not be merged into any such judgment. Section 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A'. Successors and Assigns. The terms of this Development Agreement shall be binding upon an inure to the benefit of the parties, and their successors and assigns. B. Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Development Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Development Agreement. The only relationship between the City and Property Owner is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such private property. C. Captions. The captions of this Development Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall in no way define, explain, modify, construe, limit, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning Of any of the provisions of this Development Agreement. D. Mortgagee Protection. 1. Discretion to Encumber. This Development Agreement shall not prevent or limit Property Owner, in any manner, at Property Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering the Property or any portion of the Property or any improvement on the Property by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to all or any part of the Property or any improvement thereon (a "Mortgage"). 2. Effect of Default. This Development Agreement shall be superior and senior to any Mortgage subsequently placed upon the Property, or any portion thereof, or any improvement thereon, including the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust. Despite the foregoing, breach of any provision of this Development Agreement shall not defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith and for value. 3. Mortgagee Not Obligated. Notwithstanding anything in this Development Agreement to the contrary, (i) any holder of the beneficial interest under a Mortgage ("Mortgagee,,) may acquire title to or possession of all or any portion of the Property or any improvement thereon pursuant to the remedies provided by its Mortgage, whether by judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise, and such Mortgagee shall not have any obligation under this Development Agreement to construct, fund or otherwise perform any affirmative obligation or affirmative covenant of Property Owner hereunder or to guarantee such performance, and Mortgagee may, after acquiring title to all or any portion of the Property as aforesaid, assign or otherwise transfer the Property or any such portion thereof to any person or entity, and upon the giving of notice of such assignment or transfer to City and the assumption by the assignee or transferee of the obligations of Property Owner with respect to the Property or portion thereof so acquired which arise or accrue from and after the date of assignment or transfer, Mortgagee shall be relieved and discharged of and from any and all further obligations or liabilities under this Development Agreement'with respect to the Property or portion thereof so assigned or transferred; and (ii) the consent of City shall not be required for the acquisition of all or any portion of the Property by any purchaser at a foreclosure sale conducted pursuant to the terms of any Mortgage, and such purchaser shall, by virtue of acquiring title to the Property or such portion thereof, be deemed to have assumed all obligations of the Property Owner with respect to the Property or portion thereof so acquired which arise or accrue subsequent to the date of purchase, but such purchaser shall not be responsible for any prior defaults of Property Owner; provided, however, that in either of the instances referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) above, to the extent any obligation or covenant to be performed by Property Owner is a condition to the granting of a specific benefit or to the performance of a specific covenant by City, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to City's granting of such benefit and performance of such covenant hereunder. 4. Notice of Default to Mortgagee: Right of Mortgagee to Cure. If a Mortgagee files with the City Clerk a written notice requesting a copy of any notice of default given Property Owner hereunder and specifying the address for delivery thereof, then City shall deliver to such Mortgagee, concurrently with delivery thereof to Property Owner, any notice given to Property Owner with respect to any claim of City that Property Owner has not complied with the terms hereof or is otherwise in Default hereunder. Each such Mortgagee shall have the right (but not the obligation) for a period of thirty (30) days after the expiration of any cure period given to Property Owner with respect to such Default, to cure said default; provided, however, that if any such Default cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such Mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to remedy or cure such Default if such Mortgagee commences to remedy or cure within such thirty (30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such remedy or cure. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Default is of a nature which can only be cured by Mortgagee by obtaining possession, such Mortgagee shall be deened to have remedied or cured such Default if such Mortgagee shall, within such thirty (30) day period, commence efforts to obtain possession and carry the same forward with diligence and continuity through implementation of foreclosure, appointment of a receiver or otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure or commence to remedy or cure the Default within the cure period specified in Section 3E above. 5. Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 4 above, if a Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof to obtain possession of the Project Site by any process or injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving Property Owner, Mortgagee shall for the purposes hereof be deemed to be proceeding with diligence and continuity to obtain possession of the Property during the period of such prohibition if Mortgagee is proceeding diligently to terminate such prohibition. 6. Amendment to Development Agreement. City and Property Owner agree not to modify or amend this Development Agreement or allow this Development Agreement to be modified or amended in any way, or cancel this Development Agreement, without the prior written consent of each Mortgagee, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding anything stated above to the contrary, City and Property Owner shall cooperate in including in this Development Agreement by suitable implementing agreement from time to time any provision which may reasonably be requested by a proposed Mortgagee for the purpose of implementing the mortgagee-protection provisions contained in this Development Agreement and allowing such Mortgagee reasonable means to protect or preserve the lien of the Mortgage on the occurrence of a default under the terms of this Development Agreement. City and Property Owner each agree to execute and deliver (and to acknowledge, if necessary, for recording purposes) any implementing agreement necessary to effect such request; provided, however, that any such implementing agreement shall not in any material respect adversely affect any rights of City hereunder or be materially inconsistent with the substantive provisions of this Development Agreement, the Specific Plan Entitlements and the Existing Laws. E. Consent. Where the consent or approval of a party is required in or necessary under this Development Agreement, unless the context otherwise indicates, such consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. F. Entire Agreement. This Development Agreement and the documents attached hereto and referred to herein constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Development Agreement. G. Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Development Agreement and the'satisfaction of the conditions of this Development Agreement. H. Governing Law. This Development Agreement, including, without limitation, its existence, validity, construction and operation, and the rights of each of the parties shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California. I. Recording. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Development Agreement to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of San Bernardino County no later than ten (10) days following execution of this Development Agreement by all parties. J. Time. Time is of the essence in this Development Agreement and of each and every term and condition hereof. K. Waiver. The failure of either party at any time to seek redress for any violation of this Development Agreement or any applicable law or regulation or to insist upon the strict performance of any term or condition shall not prevent any subsequent act or omission of the same or similar nature which would have originally constituted a breach of or default under this Development Agreement from having all the force and effect of an original breach or default, and such subsequent act or omission may be proceeded against to the fullest extent provided by this Development Agreement. No provision of this Development Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by a party unless the waiver is in writing and signed by such party. L. Partial Invalidity. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Development Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. M. Notices. All notices between the City and the Property Owner and any transferee under this Developmen~ Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by personal delivery, mail or facsimile. Notice by personal delivery or facsimile shall be deemed effective upon the delivery of such notice to the party for which it is intended a't the address set forth below (or, in the case of a transferee, at the address specified by such transferee in a written notice to City). Notice by mail shall be deemed effective two (2) business days after depositing such notice postage prepaid, registered or certified, return receipt requested, properly sealed with the United States Postal Service, addressed as set forth below, regardless of whether or when the notice is actually received. The parties' current address are as follows: To City: Attn: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Community Development Director To Property Owner: Attn: General Dynamics 5001 Kearny Villa Road San Diego, California Mr. Richard Hadinger 92123 With copies to: Mr. Stephen Eimer 1412 Canterra Court Pebble Beach, California 93953 Morrison.& Foerster 555 West 5th Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90017-1027 Attention: Donald I. Berger, Esq. Either party may change its mailing address or the person to whom notices are to be sent at any time by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided herein. N. Binding Effect. The covenants and agreements contained in this Development Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon each of the parties and their respective heirs, administrators, successors and assigns. O. Indemnification. GD hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and its agents, officers, and employees (the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the Indemnified Parties to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Development Agreement. GD's obligations under this Eection 4.0 are subject to and conditioned upon City and GD entering into a mutually satisfactory Joint Defense Agreement pursuant to which City shall cooperate fully with GD in the defense of the lawsuit, GD will be entitled to coordinate and direct the prosecution and defense of such lawsuit, and GD shall retain settlement authority with respect thereto. City and GD agree not to unreasonably withhold or delay their approval of such Joint Defense Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Development Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation By: By: Mayor Name: Its: ATTESTED TO: By: Name: Its: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney EXI!IBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION GENERAL DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15 AND 16 IN TIlE NORTiiEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSIIIp 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, AND THAT PORTION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE VACATED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RESOLUTION NO. 81-94, RECORDED JUNE 29, 1981, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 81-142194 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN SAID OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTy RECORDER, AND THAT PORTION OF 8TII STREET VACATED BY TIIE COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RESOLUTION NO. 83-99, RECORDED JULY 5, 1983, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 83-148882 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLy DESCRIBED AS A W]~LE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF TIlE SOUTIIERLy LINE OF THE NORTHERLy 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13 WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF TIlE EASTERLy 30.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 00· 05' 03" EAST 597.60 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN CERTIFICATE OF COHPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED JUNE 5, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-202498 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING TIlE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TtlENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLy LINE, SOUTI! 00° 05' 03"'EAST 1983.13 FEET TO THE NORTtIERLy LINE OF THE SOUTIIERLy 30.00 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTIlERLy LINE, NORTH 89° 31' 41" WEST 2594.98 FEET TO THE EASTERLy LINE OF THE WESTERLZ 30'.00 FEET OF SAID NORTIIEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLy LINE, NORTII 00° 06' 32" WEST 1412.83 FEET TO THE EASTERLy PROJECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL 11 OF AMENDING MAP OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6194, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 66, PAGES 66 T!IROUGH 70, I~CLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE ALONG SAID PROJECTION, NORTH 85· 51' 44" WEST 30.08 FEET TO THE WESTERLy LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, SAID WESTERLy LINE ALSO BEING THE EASTERLy LINE OF SAID AMENDING MAP OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6194; THENCE ALONG TIlE LAST MENTIONED WESTERLy LINE, NORTH 00° 06' 32" WEST 1151.23 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLy LINE OF TIlE NORTiIERLy 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED SOUTiiERLy LINE, SOUTH 89° 51' 00" EAST 1895.99 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLy AND SOUT!IERLy LINES, RESPECTIVELy, OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2, SOUTH 00' 05' 03" EAST 599.15 FEET AND SOUTH 89° 58' 09" EAST 730.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. A PORTION OF SAID LAND BEING PARCEL 1 OF SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED JUNE 5, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-202498 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIp 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN Tile CITY OF RANC!-|O CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SilOWN ON MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30.00 FEET WESTERLy AND 50.00 FEET SOUTHERLy OF TIIE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTH 00' 14' 31" EAST, 597.60 FEET TO TIlE NORTII LINE OF A 40.00 FOOT WIDE Order No. 9300992 Page 2 -43 DESCRIPTION EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 1936, IN BOOK 1117, PAGE 423, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 89° 52' 19" WEST, 730.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 14' 31" WEST, 599.14 FEET TO A POINT 50.00 FEET SOUTHERLy OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 89" 59' 32" EAST, 730.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS ALSO DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED JUNE 5, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-202498 OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL C: PARCELS 1 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4907, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 52, PAGES 54 AND 55 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THOMAS STREET AND VINCENT AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4907, AND PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAp NO. 8889, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 92, PAGES 46 AND 47 OF SAID PARCEL MAPS, AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 13 OF TRACT NO. 2244, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 35, PAGES 50 THROUGH 56, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 24, 25 AND 26 IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN ON MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF SAID MAPS, ALL IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLy DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13 WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLy 60.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLy LINE, NORTH 89° 22' 30" WEST 2560.46 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLy HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET IN THE BOUNDARy LINE OF SAID PARCEL 26 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4907; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLy ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89~ 16' 01" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.16 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLy 44.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 00° 06' 29" WEST 583.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 26 IN SECTION 13 OF CUCAMONGA LANDS; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89· 24' 50" WEST 14.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 26; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 26, NORTH 00~ 06' 29" WEST 331.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE MOST SOUTHERLy LINE OF SAID PARCEL I OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8889; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION, SOUTH 89~ 26' 02" EAST 14.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LAST MENTIONED PARCEL 1; THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES BEING ALONG THE WESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINES, RESPECTIVELY, OF SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL 1; THENCE NORTH 00~ 06' 29" WEST 1574.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLy HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90~ 34' 48" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.94 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 89° 31' 41" EAST 2502.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLy HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89° 26' 19" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.46 FEET; -THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 00~ 05' 22" EAST 914.09 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERL SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL 1; ~1 DESCRIPTION THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID LOT 24 IN SECTION 13 OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, SOUTH 89o 28' 04" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLy LINE OF SAID LOT 24 IN SECTION 13 OF CUCAMONGA LANDS; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 24 AND 25 IN SECTION 13 OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN BLOCK 13 OF TRACT NO. 2244, SOUTH O0° 05' 22" EAST 1008.59 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED FEBRUARy 28, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-070578 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES, RESPECTIVELy, OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2, NORTH 89e 24' 47" WEST 103.01 FEET, SOUTH 00" 05' 22" EAST 89.05 FEET, AND SOUTH 89e 24' 47" EAST 103.01 FEET TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 13 OF TRACT NO. 2244; THENCE ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE,'~LSO BEING SAID WESTERLY LINE' OF THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13, SOUTH 00· 05' 22" EAST 505.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. A PORTION OF SAID LAND BEING PARCEL 1 OF SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-070578 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL D LOT 27 AND LOT 30 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP i SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, ACCORDING TO MAP OF ~UCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 27 LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLy CORNER OF SAID LOT 30, BEING ALSO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINES OF FOURTH ST. AND CLEVELAND AVE.; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 30 AND 27, BEING ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CLEVELAND AVE., 1166.10 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID EASTERLy BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 27 AND 30, 1326.47 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDRY OF SAID LOT 27. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 27 FEET OF THE SOUTH 60 FEET OF SAID LOT 30; BEING MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE DF SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1969 IN BOOK 7361 PAGE 683 OFFICIAL RECORDS. NOTE: THE AREA AND DISTANCES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ARE COMPUTED TO THE CENTERS OF THE ADJOINING STREETS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. PARCEL E: LOT 19 AND LOT 22 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP i SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, ACCORDING TO MAP OF ~UCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE F CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 27 OF SAID SECTION 13, ACCORDING TO SAID MAP OF CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: DESCRIPTION BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 30 OF SAID SECTION 13, OF SAID MAP OF CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS, BEING ALSO THE INTERSECTIQN OF THE CENTERLINES OF FOURTH ST. AND CLEVELAND AVE.; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 30 AND 27, ~EING ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CLEVELAND AVE., 1166.10 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 27 AND 30, 1326.47 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 27. NOTE: THE AREA AND DISTANCES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ARE COMPUTED TO THE CENTERS OF THE ADJOINING STREETS SHOWN ON SAID M.~P. Por. Cucm,..,ga Fruit L. ends M. B. 4/9 Roncho Cucomongo ulfy Tox Rate Area 15015 ^ 1~. : (Parcel A) I I 7 I (Parcel A) : I0 ,'c~:'. I "'t · I ' ¢ : r~. P. I--L;. -- -- ( Pa rcell A ) I I e I (Parcel A) 15 I il ._,1 (Parcel A) 9 (Parcel A) 16 ,-.,,d, ,'.,- ' S i R E~';~ ~,:-"*'J. .,~ _~ · i(--~- ·. ~- 6th- Assessor's Mop Book 209 Poge 27 Son 8ernordino Counlv 2o9- / / Par. Cucamonga R'uit Lands M.B. 4/9 Par Tract No. 2244. MB. 35/50-56 Roncho Cucomongo Cily Tax Rote Area 15015' I i ,, ZO 19 (Parcel D 22 (Parcel D ) 27 (Parcel E ) @- (Parcel E ) Parcel &lop No 9499, P. M. !02/2-3 rbrcel Mop I~a.g~.q~, P.M. 32/46-47 ~B 419 ,J U · , ®.. t!~.4 ~F Par, (~) 26 (Parcel C ) (Parcel C ) :; .® Per, I (Parcel C ) 'p. I~ .91Z 146'47 (Parcel C ) Poe. 24 Poc (Parcel C ) Lol I o ~ ' Black 13 ~.' (Parcel C ) s~.EEr 2-~ - Assessors Mop' Book 210 Page OB Son Be#'nordino County L Percel Map ,,u. 4907, BM. 52/54, 55 (Parcel C ) Rancho Cucomonga City 210. Tax Rote Area 15015 J~n. 1980 j Par. #6 FOURTI! e @ ® Per. Per. 17 ~8 10990 Pot. 8 Par.. '~ /l~- Par. ZO Par. 2l ~'~ Pot'. Z2 Par. SE 114, Sec. 13, T. IS.. R. 7W. POL T vl ~TREE! Par Per. zoo Pot. 2 zOa ~ Assessor's I~,ap F~Ook 210, Page 36 San Bernardlno County EXHIBIT B GENERAL DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXACTIONS The Specific Plan Entitlement (collectively. "Exactions") consist of the following documents: City Council Ordinance No. 525 approving the Specific Plan 93-01 (Subarea 18 Specific Plan) Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan EIR, dated May 4, 1994, and prepared by Michael Brandman Associates. Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-32 approving tentative Parcel Map 14647 ORDINANCE NO. 527 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITy PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO COMMUNITy COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE WEST, CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM AVENUE ON THE EAST AND AMENDING VARIOUS TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63. A. Recitals. 1. On May 11, J994, and continued to May 25, and June 22, 1994, the Planning Conmmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings with respect to the above-referenced Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearings, the Planning Con~nission adopted Resolution No. 94-57, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 94-01. 2. On July 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to adoption of this Ordinance. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as SECTION l: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: A) That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommended approval of the Community Plan Text Amendment hereinafter described to the City Council. This City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B) That this Community Plan Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) That this Community Plan Text Amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY CCUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. TVCPA 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES July 6, 1994 Page.2 D) That this Comunity Plan Text Amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: A) That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. B) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753-5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Tetra Vista Co~mn/nity Plan Amendment 94-01 as referenced in Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 5: Within 60 days of City Council approval, a revised Tetra Vista Community Plan, incorporating the changes required shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval. Upon acceptance by the City Planner, a total of 25 bound copies of the Plan shall be submitted for distribution to the City Council, the City Clerk, the Planning Commission and staff. In addition, one unbound original copy, and one executable copy on a 3.5-inch c~eputer diskette in a format acceptable to the City, shall be submitted. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin of Ontario, California, and circulated in the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. This amendment #7 to the Terra Vista Plan is proposed to change the area between Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Church Street from Office Use to Community Commercial uses. AMFNDFD PAC, FS IN TFRRA VISTA COMMUNITY p! AN Land Uses Figure II1-17, the Land Use Plan (page 111-23, is hereby replaced with revised page 111-23, included in this document, Pages 111-26 and 111-27 are hereby replaced with the revised pages appearing in this document. The "statistical summary' is hereby replaced with revised page 111-32 appearing in this document. Design G~idelines Pages IV-48, IV-49, IV-50, IV-51, IV-52, IV-53, IV-57, IV-58, and IV-59 are hereby replaced with the revised pages appearing in this document. Pages IV-47 and IV- 54 are unchanged but are included for clarity. AncillRry Graphics The following graphics of which the Land Use Plan is a base are hereby amended by reference to reflect the same changes made in Figure II1-17 (revised page 111-23). · Figure III- 1 · Figure 111-8 · Figure II1-12 · Figure II1-15 · Figure 111-16 Terra Vista Plan Neighborhood Park and Greenway System Circulation Plan Suggested Transit Plan · Figure IV-1 · Figure IV-8 · Figure IV-23 · Figure IV-41 Landscape Plan Likely Location of Edge Treatment along Major Arterials Greenway System Design Features Street Intersections with Greenway and Trails · Figure VI-2 · Figure VI-3 · Figure VI-4 Density Distribution Plan As Built Land Use Progress Plan As Built Density Distribution Plan Figure IV-67 panorama of Foothill Boulevard is hereby amended by reference to reflect changes in Figure IV-70. Miscellaneous Any discrepancies between the balance of the Community Plan and the content of this Amendment are to be based on the intent of the Amendment. LM NC · M M H CC CC | i l~ LM M NC M LM l i Ir LM LM M P MH LM LM M LM P CC H MHO | LM M LM MOC ll.l ACRES OF MH I.I ACRil OF M J t RESIDENTIAL CC co.,,.m, NC ,~,.~co,__.~ NIXED USE Ot:FICE ' PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBUC FIGURE IH-17 Land Use Plan Density Ranges of Approved Projects may vary slightly from the Plan; See "As Built Land Use Progress Plan" - Figure VI-3 on page V1-11. I REVISED Amendment No. 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7 III ""~ Variety of Densities Within All Neiohborhoods, Each neighborhood in Terre Vista has a mix of housing types, varying from single-family detached to multifamily housing, allowing people from many income groups and of differing lifestyles to live in Terra Vista. While the neighborhoods differ in character, no neighborhood is entirely higher density or entirely lower density. GllZll~rciRI land IJses Commercial land uses in the Terre Vista planned community are grouped in centers according to functional requirements to crete convenient, efficient, and visually pleasing environments. Most cemmerclal centers are situated between Foothill Boulevard and Chumh Street {Figure 111-21}; however, neighborhood and other smell commercial centers can be found elsewhere in the community to serve the more localized and specialized needs both of community residents and of residents in adjoining communities. The various commercial land uses in Terra %fmta include: · Community Commercial · O/Ibm · Bankl · Office~ · Entertainment · 8aving~ & I-~ans · Commercial , OI!ice~ · Office · RelidenUal · Entertainment FIGURE 111-21 * Commercial · Medical · RealdenUal · Hospital · Office , Medical Related Facilities * Commercial Centers Concept Nong Foothill Boulevard stores, supermarkets, financial institutions, and other functions. In addition, the Community Commercial center can have entertainment facilities and/or restaurants. The intent is that the Community Commercial parcel will cater to a mix of uses that will make the development lively well into the night, to function as an active "people place" in service to the residents of Terra Vista and the City of · Neighborhood Commercial Rancho Cucamenga. A mere detailed description of the Community Commercial parcel in terms of design · Recreational Commercial guidelines is provided in Chapter IV, · Office Park Comma ,nity CommerciRI (cCI, The Community Commercial parcel at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue can accommodate department store development, numerous tenant stores arranged around either an open or enclosed pedestrian mall, and community-oriented service establishments such as drug REVISED AmendmeN No. I, 6, 6 & 7 111-26 The Community Commercial parcel on Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues will complement the uses found in the Community Commercial parcel to the west. Many of the same uses now found in the parcel to the west, such as restaurants. ;upormefke,e. communitv- oriented service establishments and offices. as well as other community-wide tenants requirin0 large floor areas such as electronic stores can be accommodated on this .parcel. ""T'VPC ~ Neighborhood Commercial {NCI. Two neighborhood commercial centers are specified in the Terra Vista Community Plan, one at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road, and another at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue, The purpose of these centers is to provide sites for markets, drug stores, laundrornats, dry cleaners, and other neighborhood shops and services. Their locations make both centers easily accessible by automobile from all parts of Terra Vista via the loop parkway, while offering exposure to residents in adjoining communities. The centers are near to extensions of the greenway system for easy access on foot and by bicycle. In addition to the two Neighborhood Commercial centers, some local shopping uses are permitted within the Recreational Commercial site near the Milliken Avenue greenway underpass, and at the southeast corner of Church Street and Orchard Avenue (MOC parcell. Convenience commercial uses may occur elsewhere as discussed in Chapter V. RecreationRI Comrqercial IRCI. The recreational commercial center site is near the geographic heart of Terra Vista, adjacent to Milliken Avenue and Church Street. Facilities that will be developed on the site will cater to 'a combination of indoor and outdoor, recreation-oriented activities. These may include racquetball courts, a golf driving range, batting cages, a miniature golf course, tennis courts, health clubs, pro shops, swimming clubs, outdoor-oriented restaurants, lounges, health food stores, athletic equipment sales and service, and other functions. The location near the primary greenway spine (and Milliken Avenue undercrossing) makes the facilities especially conducive to Terra Vista residents' jogging or cycling to the recreational commercial center, rather than driving. In the same vein, the presence of public parks and parkways adjacent to the center allows joint Use of the public open space. In this way, team sports and spontaneous recreational activities will be fostered '- available to the public, regardless of residence in Tetra Vista, Also, as noted above, the site can also accommodate some local commercial facilities.- Office Park {OPI. Office Park sites are oresent north of Town Center Drive. The concept is that these Office Park parcels can attract professional and corporate tenants to Rancho Cucamonga by offering high-quality buildings in a landscaped, pedestrian-oriented environment with numerous amenides at close hand. Ideally, many of the people populating these office developments would also live in Terra Vista, allowing them to walk or cycle to work. A smaller Office Park site, intended for professionals serving the local area, is planned at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road, Business Park Overlay 7one, Subject to approval of a CUP, the Business Park Overlay Zone may be used in any area otherwise zoned for office use. The purpose of the Business Park Overlay is to provide for multi- tenant projects fostering small business development. Small business users typically require a combination of office and limited storage area, with the office use expanding, over time, to fill most of the building area; for this reason, parking requirements for Business Parks shall be the same as for office parks, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. REVISED Amendment No. I, 3. 5, 6 i 7 j~X t. Jfl~l T tL~.~ II1-~'~ Table 111-2 December 31, 1989 LAND USE SUMMARY Revised March 7, 1994 Amendment #1. #2. #3. #5. #6 and #7 Revised to Corre,4Dond to Land Use Man (Figure II1-17,j~. 111-23) Midrange Number of ' LAND USE DESIGNATION RESIDENTIAL Low Medium Density (4-8 DU/AC) Medium Density (8-14 DU/AC) Medium High Density (14-24 DU/AC) High Density (24-30 DU/AC) Subtotal (Residential) COMMERCIAL MIXED USE3 Community Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Office Park Recreational Commercial Mixed Use4- Financial, Commercial, etc. Mixed Use4- Medical, Office, etc. Mixed Use4 - Office, Commercial, etc. Subtotal (Commercial/Mixed Use) Gross Dwelling Units/ Acres Gross Acre {AC) {DU/AC) Dwelling Units {DU) 310.3 6 1825~ 300.1 9 2700 114.5 19 2118 54.7 27 !477 779.6 8120 101.1 26.0 36.4 9.7 16.8 21.0 252.9 Estimated Estimated Persons/ Number of Household Persons 3.43 6,259 2.582 6,966 1.52 3,219 1.53 2,~59 18,703 QUASI-PUBLIC AND PUBLICs Hospital Schools Central Park (Proposed by General Plan)* Parks and Trailse Special Landscape (Loop Median) Flood Control/Recreation Subtotal (Quasi-Public and Public) 10.0 46.0 99.2 51.9 4.9 12.4 224.4 MAJOR HIGHWAYSa TOTAL REVISED An'~endment No. 1.2.3, 5. 6 & 7 III- 32 64.1 1.321.0 8120 18,703 FOOTNOTES FOR STATISTICAL SUMMARY TABLE 111-2 It is assumed that a portion of the land shown in residential use will be developed in community uses through the process described elsewhere in this plan. For this reason, 6.4 acres of Low Medium Density and 3.0 acres of Medium High Density which appear on the Land Use Plan are excluded from the residential dwelling calculations on the previous page. Household size for Medium Density residential is an arithmetic average based on the estimated distribution of types of dwellings to be built. See Chapter VI of the Terra Vista text. Descriptions of commercial land uses indicate the general type of development considered. Actual permitted land uses are enumerated in Chapter V of the Terra Vista text. Commercial acreages in Mixed Use parcels exclude residential uses, estimated to total 6.5 acres of High Density, 18.8 acres of Medium High Density, and 9.9 acres of Medium Density residential. Specific locations for community uses are not determined by this plan because the site size and location desired will vary depending on the user. However, it is estimated that 9.9 acres not included in the tabulation of public and quasi-public acreage will be developed in community uses. See Note 1 above. Major highways acreage includes half-width rights-of- way for Foothill, Haven, Rochester, Base Line east of Mill(ken, and Mill(ken north of Base Line e, and full- width rights-of-way for Mill(ken south of Base Line and Base Line west of Mill(ken. With density bonuses a total of 9,338 units are permit"ted in Terra Vista. Park and trail acreage of 51.9 shown on the Land Use Summary and Land Use Plan (pages 111-23 and IV-15) exceeds the 47.86 acre requirement (56.06 acres per page VI-3 less 8.2 acres private open space credit per the Park Implementation Plan) by approximately four acres. Trail widths and locations may change slightly as developments proceed through the planning process, and a portion of the park land shown on Mill(ken Avenue may be converted to another "community use" (a YMCA), but in no event will public park, greenway and trail acreage fall below 47.9. now a part of City Park. REVISED Amendment No. 1, 2. 6 & 7 Ill-q4 Foothill Boulevard Centers Concept Special attention has been focused on the character of development along the southern boundary of Terra Vista, the community's frontage on Foothill Boulevard. This special attention is warranted for the following reasons: Foothill Boulevard is a primary travel route in the region; more people will be viewing Terra Vista from this vantage point than from any other. Since Terra Vista is at the geographical heart of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, views of Terra Vista will contribute greatly to people's impressions of the City as a whole. Land along Foothill Boulevard, by virtue of its exposure to thousands of passmrs-by, has the potential of contributing substantially to the City tax base if developed to its full commercial potential. Foothill Boulevard represents a transition from residential development north of the boulevard to non-residential development south of the boulevard, and, consequently, development along Foothill Boulevard in Terra Vista should act as a buffer between--and should complement--these land uses. As the design guidelines are put into effect with each development along Foothill Boulevard, the result should be a visual impression of a variety of building types and scales, a comfortable rhythm of open and developed spaces, and melding of business, institutional, and residential functions. As described in the commercial land use section of Chapter III, the Foothill Boulevard frontage has been organized into a series of centers, each intended to feature a unique mix of land uses, complementary building shapes and sizes, and distinctive character. These centers allow for many efficiencies, including: · Shopping and business in a central location, providing maximum convenience and minimum travel for Rancho Cucamonga residents and employees · Easy access from both Foothill Boulevard and Church Street, resulting in smoother traffic flow and greater convenience Direct pedestrian access from the Terra Vista greenway system along trails, bikeways, and sidewalks, allowing community residents to eliminate many automobile trips Location on primary local and regional transit routes, allowing convenient bus travel Primary vehicular access to each center from cross-streets, rather than from Foothill Boulevard, allowing a smoother flow of traffic along the boulevard · Opportunities for the sharing of parking areas and other facilities by complementary uses The result is that the centers along Foothill Boulevard can function as true "one-stop" multi- purpose attractions for areawide residents. The fact that the centers will be well planned, attractively landscaped, and easily identified will help to make REVISED Amendment No. I & 7 IV-47 REVISED Amendment No. I, 6, 8 & 7 IV-48 the centers the place to go rather than one or two individual entities within them. Because of this, all the concerns located in the centers should benefit. The overall design concept for the centers along Foothill Boulevard is best described by breaking down the centers' design guidelines into the following four components: Center identity and specific uses Access and community gateways Site planning and pedestrian network Landscape treatment Each of these components is described below in terms of how they will affect the image and appearance of Tetra Vista from Foothill Boulevard, Following this discussion are individual profiles of each center. Center Identity and Specific Uses Each center along Foothill Boulevard is intended to cater to a different mix of business, office, professional, and residential functions. For convenience, each has been identified by a preliminary name reflecting the types of uses currently expected to predominate within it (Figure IV-63): · Town Center · Cnmmnrcis~l PRrk · Financial/Restaurant Area · Medical Park · Executive Park The discussion in Chapter |11 on commercial land uses in Tetra Vista described the unique mix of specific commercial facilities in each center that complements adjoining commercial centers yel promotes variety and idenlity. Access and Community Galewq.ys AcceSs. Within the Tetra Vista community, primary access to each of the centers along Foothill Boulevard will be from Church Street and norlh-south streets connecting Church Street with Foothill Boulevard, as indicated diagrammatically in Figure IV- 64. The reason for this access concept is twofold: Sm,~other Traffic Flow. Anticipated traffic Cawreedy Retmwa, Perk levels along Foothill Boulevard are relatively clem~bl Iq,ze high; the removal of primary access points from Foothill Boulevard allows for smoother '- traffic flow along the boulevard. Left turns into cenlers will generally be confined to the Intersections and locations shown, since such movements at other than strategically spaced '1 e,,ee k locations can inhibit traffic flow. J)ett,~r Traffic rlistrih.,tion. Access from Church ' Street and from uoss streets perpendicular Io Foothill Boulevard will help to dislribute traffic more equally between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard than would be possible with primary Foothill Boulevard access points only. Tetra Vista Residents will have no need Prfmay Acrae and e-' st'e,~ ~ for Fooml Boukwak-d lo use Foothill Boulevard for intra-community Irips Ior shopping, enterlainment, and other daily needs. Gateways, Gateways are another major means of punctuating the FoothilJ Boulevard frontage in Terra Vista. As indicated in Figure IV-64, there are two Type I gateways to the community ~rough the Foothill Boulevard commercial development. These major gateways occur at ~e corners of Foothill Boulevard W.'.n.h Milliken and Rochester Avenues. treatment, as described in the landscape section earlier in this chapter. She Planning and Pedestrian Nelwork Each cenler along Foothill Boulevard will have a different appearance from Ihe boulevard within the context of the uniform Tetra Vista design image. As indicated conceptuarly in Figure IV-65, the arrangement of buildings, parking areas, and pedestrian walkways is unique to each center. For example: In the Town Center, smaller buildings are clustered close to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, while more imposing commercial struclures are eel back from Ihese sireels. The primary greenway spine leads direclly to Ihe Town Center community commercial center and to the east-west pedestrian linkage through the Foothill Boulevard centers. · In the Financial/Restaurant Plaza, buildings will e~ifc~ the site; centralized ~rking will serve all establishmenls but be hidden Irom viw from F~thill Boulvard. 1'~ pedestrian walkway will assu~ a circular configuration around the ~rking area. · In the Medical Park, as with Ihe Cor~rate Park, a ~nerous o~n sp~e wilhin lhe ca~us will ~ Ihe f~us for buildings. Larger heallh care f~ilitis will be set well back'from Foothill Boulvard. A ~destdan path will lad to the site and will, in turn, con~ct with t~ trail system. · In the Ex~utive Park, buildings will sitemale from locations close to F~thill B~levard to ~tio~ set woll back from the boutyard. Autom~le d~lerships would feelure small d~p~y pavil~ns lining F~thill ~ulevard, with prima~ buildings set back from the boutyard and serves 8r~s orienl~ away from view. · The ~scaped ~d~trian way will ~lp to bufl~ commrcial and resi~tial devetop~nts. The r~ull of th~ careful~ con~v~ site pinning. cou~ed mffi ~talid desire for each ~ter that will ~ r~e~ pr~r to site devel~nt, s~uld be a d~el~mnt pattern thai uses scab, rhythm. varify 1o excdlent ~vantage. Landscage Treatrpent. Each cenler has been carefully evaluated from the slandpoint of landscaping to create an attractive, manicured image for Terra Vista along ' t~ landsca~ concept i~lude: · Tree rows As i~icated diagra~t~ally in Figure IV-66, trees symbolizing the Tetra ~sta community will line Foothill treatments in ~nfmma~e with t~ building own Center, edOe plantiRgs will be provided to clady s~n by molorists alo~ Foothill REVISED hint Ne. 1.5 i ~ IV-51 In the Financial/Restaurant Plaza, the parking area will be screened from motorists on Foothill Boulevard by the buildings themselves. Informal planrings will be provided around and between the buildings. In the Medical Park, there will be two rows of trees, plus landscaping in the parking areas along Foothill Boulevard. Landscaoina and low berms may also be provideO to screen park;ng areas further. In the Executive Park, views will open up in landscaped areas, such as between medical/professional office buildings adjoining the Medical Park. Planrings and berms will provide some screening where these views are not available, such as between automobile display pavilions oriented toward Foothill Boulevard. In this last regard, the setbacks for both parking areas and buildings along Foothill Boulevard have been specially selected to address the Boulevard's unique role as a primary travel corridor in Rancho Cucamonga. As noted in the section earlier in this chapter on landscaping, setbacks along Foothill Boulevard from the curb to parking areas will be 28 feet minimum {43 feet average), and from the curb to buildings, 38 feet minimum (43 feet average). It was felt in planning the Foothill Boulevard frontage that the objectives of variety and visual interest would be best sewed by a combination of techniques that REVISED Amendment No. I & 7 IV-52 would be used in conjunction with setbacks. These techniques, which are described elsewhere in this section, include: Specifying average setbacks (43 feet .from the curb to parking areas or buildings) in addition to minimum setbacks, assuring that many buildings will be set well back beyond the minimum required distance Site planning guidelines for several of the parcels along Foothill Boulevard calling for very generous setbacks, taking on the image of landscaped parks Berming that occurs along portions of the boulevard frontage within the Planned Community to soften views and screen parking areas Major "windows" into the projects periodically along the boulevard frontage, constituting large setbacks in special situations. SummeW. To provide an overview of the imege one will have driving along Foothill Boulevard past the various commercial centers, a "panorame" of development along the boulevard has been prepared. Figure IV-67 offers a conceptual plan of the entire Foothill Boulevard frontage within Terra Vista and, in conjunction with this conceptual plan, a view or views of some of the major highlights along the corridor. {Larger reproductions of these views will follow.} As indicated by Figure IV-67, development along Foothill Boulevard--acknowledging that actual development mey differ according to specific development programs but will adhere to the spirit and quality portrayed-will be epitomized by variety, attractive clustedngs of buildings and open spaces, and an imege that builds on the unique heritage and qualities of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. comm,,nity Co- rci , Cente The Community Commercial Center Iocate~ "6~:" Foothill Eloulevard belween Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue will be a one-stop commercial center serving Terra Vista and Furlhermore, by orienling a number of smaller buildings around an open space at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, an attraclive image of the center {and of the community) is provided Io people driving along both Rancho Cucamonga, supplementing other arterials (Figure IV-691. Through the use of landscaped rleighbo~hoodtvillage cornmm'cial centers with a broader pedestrian connections through the center arid parking range of stores (Figure IV-68). The center as curren!ly areas, the major greenway spine, which terminates al the envisioned would have at least two deparlmenl stores, northeast side of the community commercial parcel, is numerous tenant sto<es, and recreational arid eating efleclively brought through the center all the way to the lacilities. The sile is also expected to have offices corner. integrated with the communily commercial development. The center wig offer an attractively landscaped environment that will encourage strolling, window ~ p/~(::~ IL/-55' HN~ ~L/'-'~'b ~,,~_ shopping, and pausing to relax at shaded seating clusters. The various buildings that make up the center can be Gt~AlPdlc~ .lJld~ ILLL)5'T~A--r~ ,~ ,,,~j- joined together by covered walkways sheltering pedestrians and conveying themes such as arbors, trellises, and vines. Through this architectural treatment, which will be a low profile and sel off by open space, the architectural heritage of Rancho Cucamonga will be recalled. Landscaping will play a major role in views of the center from Foothill Boulevard. Earth betins will minknize views of pro king areas adjacent Io the boulevard, while still aliowir~ the buildings to be seen from the road. The mass of the various buildings in the center wil be divided so as to be human scaled and not to appear monolilhic. Through the rhythm that wilt be created by the interaction of landscaping, buildings, and landscaped parking areas, no one element wil dominate views from Foothill Boulevard and a varied visual image wil result. 12, IV-54 .Comrnerciel Park. ioTmmCen~r ms. ~snSng t to be modified after op Site ptan . Worksia P, c. (~[z~//~,~ FIGURE IV-71 View of Town Center Plaza from FoothiM Boulevard IV-,~56r' ~x'thBT e.c, ,.,r FIGURE N-72 View of Town Center Plaza from Spruce Avenue DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AME~qDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request f6r various streamlining amendments to the development/ design review procedures and land use regulations. INDUSTR/AL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDME~qT 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Types, Land Use Type Definitions, and the permitted and conditionally permitted uses of various subareas. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDME~qT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Regulations for Subarea 1, 2, 3, and 4 regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Provisions regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses for Office and Con~nercial Districts. ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Neighborhood Con~nercial District. VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Co~nercial areas. TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the time extension provisions. ll~Cga~[!~IDA~ION The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed amendments. 117 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREAMLINING AMENDMENTS/PERMIT PROCESS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT July 20, 1994 Page 2 ANALYSIS The proposed amendments simplify and shorten the permit process for new development and expands the list of permitted uses within various zones. These changes were prepared in response to input from the business community regarding the need to create a more streamlined review process. The proposed amendments have been reviewed by the Planning Commission subcommittee of the City Council (Mayor Dennis L. Stout and Mayor Pro Tem Charles Buquet II). The attached June 8, 1994 staff report to the Planning Commission explains the proposed changes in detail. BB:DC:sp Attachments: June 8, 1994 Planning Con~nission Staff Report June 8, 1994 Planning Commission Minutes Ordinance for DCA 94-02 Ordinance for ISPA 94-03 Resolution for FBSPA 94-01 Ordinance for ESPA 94-01 Ordinance for ENSPA 94-01 Ordinance for VCPA 94-01 Ordinance for TVCPA 94-02 Ordinance for Subdivision Ordinance Amendment 94-01 118 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 8, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA - A request for various streamlining amendments to the development/design review procedures and land use regulations. INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Types, Land Use Type Definitions, and the permitted and conditionally permitted uses of various subareas. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Regulations for Subarea 1, 2, 3, and 4 regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Provisions regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses for Office and Co~nercial Districts. ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Neighborhood Comercial District. VICTORIA CO~4UNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the. time extension provisions. 119 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT STREAMLINING CHANGES - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 8, 1994 Page 2 ABSTRACT: This report presents a package of amendments that, taken together, will streamline the planning process. BACKGROUND: Since incorporation, the City has strived to refine and improve the planning process. Permitting procedures should be periodically reviewed and updated to keep them in good running' order. The process should be as simple to administer, and as economical in its use of time, effort, and money, as possible - both for the applicant and the City. However, pursuing efficiency cannot be allowed to compromise the valid public purpose for which the Development Review process was created. Likewise, efficiency must not be achieved at the expense of effectiveness, fairness, and procedural due process. In previous discussions, the Commission identified the following objectives for streamlining the planning process: OBJECTIVES * To simplify the process without compromising the quality of development. * To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Commission to focus on broader policy issues rather than details. * To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough. ANALYSIS: There are three categories of changes that are recommended to streamline the planning process: Delegate greater permit approval authority to the City Planner. In order to free-up Planning Commission time to focus on broader issues, many of the items that appear on their agendas could be handled by staff instead. Specifically, non-construction conditional use permits (CUPs), time extensions, and smaller development/design review projects could be subject to City Planner review and approval. This is common practice in many cities and counties. All other permit entitlements would continue to be processed as usual (see Exhibit "A"). Amend zoning requlations regarding conditionally permitted uses. Most of our regulatory documents, such as the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan, are at least ten years old. Experience has shown that many uses should not need a CUP process. By making more uses permitted by right, rather than conditionally permitted, the process can be expedited by eliminating the lengthy public hearing process. For example, the great majority of CUP requests do not involve construction; hence, they have not been controversial. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT STREAMLINING CHANGES - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 8, 1994 Page 3 Shorten the review process. The Development Review process can be shortened for public hearing items (i.e., subdivision, CUPs) by reducing the period for Technical/Grading/Design Committee review of plans and prescheduling times for hearing. Such a change requires adjustment in staff's procedures and would not require an ordinance amendment. Also, by delegating permit approval to the City Planner, approvals could be granted in about half the time than projects requiring Commission action. In some cases, shortening the time frames for review may result in some technical issues being conditioned for resolution during plan check. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the streamlining amendments to the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolutions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Permit Sun~nary Resolution of Approval for DCA 94-02 Resolution of Approval for ISPA 94-03 Resolution of Approval for FBSPA 94-01 Resolution of Approval for ESPA 94-01 Resolution of Approval for ENSPA 94-01 Resolution of Approval for VCPA 94-01 Resolution of Approval for TVCPA 94-02 Resolution of Approval of Subdivision Ordinance Amendment 94-01 PERMIT SUMMARY Delegate Permit Approval Responsibility As Follows: Permit Current Proposed General Plan Amendment Zone Change Tentative Tract Map Parcel Map Conditional Use Permit Non-Construction CUP Development Review (> 10 acres or on major arterial street) Development Review (< 10 acres and not on major arterial street) Minor Development Review Variance Minor Exception Time Extensions Uniform Sign Programs Council Council Commission Commission Commission Commission Commission Commission Staff Commission Staff Commission Staff No Change No Change No Change No Change No Change Staff No Change Staff No Change No Change No Change Staff No Change EXHIBIT "A" RESOLUTION NO. 94-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-02 AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. 94-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows= 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: ae and ~ be the environment. The application applies to property located within the City; The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on 3. Base~ upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as followel a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and PLANNING CGMIiSSZON PESOLUTiSN $jC. '---- DCA 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUC~MONGA June 8, 1994 Page 2 c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan Or the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs l, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucaunonga hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 94-02 to modify the Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance. 6, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994· PLANN O~AM SSION OF~HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E.D~~a~ ~ · a Bar a~rman ATTES Z, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Cosmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing ReloZution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coemnission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit= AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY RESOLUTION NO. 94-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Ranthe Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-03, as described in the title of this Resolution. Mereinafter in this Resolution, =he subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Ranthe Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Ranthe Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: ae and b. the environment. The application applies to property located within the City; The propose~ amendments will not have a significant impact on 3. Base4 upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the Ibeve-rsference~ public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follower a. That this amendment does not conflict with -the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and PLANNING CO~.MZSSiON ISPA 94-03 - CiTY OF RANCHO CUCkMONGA June 8, 1994 Page 2 c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 94-03 to modify the Industrial Area Specific Plan per the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994. PLANNING I~ON OF TH.~~ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. Dav~-~~~ rTEST: ~ rad i 1~ ATTEST · I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cosmission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: COMMISSIONERSz BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY RESOLUTION NO. }4-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTMILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TMEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: and be the environment. The application applies to property located within the City; The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Comission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and PLANNING COmMiSSiON RESGLUTZ3N :jC. FSPA 94-0! -CITY OF RANCHO CUCk~ONGA June 8, 1994 Page 2 c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the propoeed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 94-01 to modify the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan per the attached Resolution. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ,8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994. PLANNIN~~ION OF~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' \ ATTEST I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Con~nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. the environment. The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as followsz a, That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for develo~x~ent within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related develo~xnent; and b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and PLANNING COmmiSSiON PESCLUiiEN TjZ. -- ESPA 94-01 - CITY OF P/NCHO CUCkMCNGA June 8, 1994 Page 2 c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in3urious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b}(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 94-01 to modify the Etiwanda Specific Plan per the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994. PLANNI MM-~SION OF '~H' ~ ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E.~i~ Ba I, Brad BuZZer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 130 RESOLUTION NO. 94-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as 'the application." 2. On the 8th day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: and a. The application applies to property located within the City; b. the environment. The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as followel a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan; and 131 PLANNING COSMiSSiON RESCLUTiSN NC- .-- ENSPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCkMONGA June 8, 1994 Page 2 c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment 94-01 to modify the Etiwanda North Specific Plan per the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994. PLANN: BY: ' ~TTEST: ATTEST I, Brad BuXLet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cosmission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MEIXIHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 132 RESOLUTION NO. 94-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 94-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application.- 2. On the ~th day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: and b. the environment. The application applies to property located within the City; The proposed amendments wiZl not have a significant impact on 3, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows= a. That this ~mendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESCLUTiON NO. '--- TVCPA 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 8, 1994 Page 2 c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-02 Co modify the Terra Vista Community Plan per the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNI ~ION OF BY: rman ARPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ATTEST: Lrad~ I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Pllnning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify Chic the foregoing ReloZution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, aC a regular meeting of the Planning C~emission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY RESOLUTION NO. ~4-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 94-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cosmission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: and a. The application applies to property located within the City; b. the environment. The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as followez a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan; and 135 PLANNING CO~2SSiCN RESCLUTi2~ :iS. '-- VCPA 94-01 ~ CiTY OF RANCHO CUC~ONGA June 8, 1994 Page 2 c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of nhe General Plan or the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the propoeed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3}. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 94-01 to modify the Victoria Community Plan per the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994. PLANNIN . SIONgTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA BY: ~Da~~ E. Da B~e~~Chair~an ' TTEST: Lr~ ATTEST. I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning C~mmission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERSz NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 136 RESOLUTION NO. 94-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDRENT 94-01, AMENDING TITLE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Subdivision Ordinance Amendment No. 94-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Mereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Subdivision Ordinance Amendment is referred to as "the application.- 2. On the 8th day of June 1994, the Planning Co~e~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, TMEREFORM, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Co~nission of the City of Rancho Cucemonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Co~enission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: and a. The application applies to property located within the City; b. The proposed amendments will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Base~ upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the a~eve-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Cos~ission hereby finds and concludes as follows= a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with relate~ develo~mnent; and b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and 137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTZON NO. .~-~ SUBDIV. ORD. AMEND. 94-Q1 - CiTY OF R.C. June 8, 1994 Page 2 c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that ther~ is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Subdivision Ordinance Amendment 94-01 to modify the Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994. PLANNIN ~.MMISSI~ON OF TH:~ITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA ' ATTESTz/~~>~ I, Brad BulZer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cosmission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wi~z AYES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 138 D DISCUSSIGN PURPOSES ONLY The Planning Commission recessed from 10:11 p.m. to 10:20 p.m. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request for various streamlining amendments to the development/ design review procedures and land use regulations· INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Types, Land Use Type Definitions, and the permitted and conditionally permitted uses of various subareas. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Regulations for Subarea 1, 2, 3, and 4 regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses. Je ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Provisions regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses for Office and Commercial Districts. Ke ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Neighborhood Commercial District. Le VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. Me TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. N. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the time extension provisions. Commissioner Lumpp stated it would be his preference to list tattoo parlors as a use requiring a conditional use permit in the Neighborhood Commercial zone. Brad Buller, City Planner, said there are currently discussions under way at the staff level. He stated there is a new tattoo parlor in town and staff is researching the issues. Me observed that most cities are finding that the location is not a land use issue, but tattoo parlors are a health safety issue. Me reported that Claremont recently chose to prohibit tattoo parlors but others have chosen to deem tattoo parlors to be adult businesses. He suggested further evaluation be undertaken prior to listing them as a conditional use in certain areas. Commissioner Lumpp stated it is sufficient that staff is in the process of reviewing. Me preferred not to have another tattoo parlor open in the City without some additional review. Planning Commission Minutes -21- June 8, 1994 139 Mr. Buller stated that currently tattoo parlors are not identified in any City documents, and it could therefore be interpreted that it is not a permitted use. Chairman Barker asked if that meant that if a use is not listed, it is not permitted. Mr. Buller said an applicant can approach the City and request a use determination to indicate where a use is most appropriate. He said the City Planner or the Planning Commission can make that determination. He said the City could determine that a particular use is not permitted by placing the use in a category that is not permitted. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated the document is evolving and not intended to have an all-inclusive listing of uses. He said it is open to some interpretation as to use categories. Commissioner Melcher observed that he recently read something that said in effect that the changes in handling of projects are designed to facilitate processing for the applicant by shortening time frames but will not change the City Planning Division's workload because the staff report that would have been prepared for the Commission will now be prepared for the City Planner. Mr. Buller said that he had made that statement in response to a question on how streamlining would affect staff resources available for special projects. He said his time would become more involved in processing projects and staff would still have to do the same level of investigation and analysis for projects coming before the City Planner as those coming before the Commission. He said over the course of time, he would consider how such reports could be shortened. Commissioner Melcher stated that the Commission had felt that streamlining would allow the Commission to shift its focus to planning and policy issues, but he was now concerned that such a shift in focus would be difficult for staff because it would require the development of additional staff reports being written by those whose jobs are already more than full time. Chairman Barker said he had heard Mr. Bullet state that he would initially require the same level of detail in staff reports. Commissioner Melcher said that the Advance Planning staff is busily working on forward planning issues and not currently bringing those matters to the Commission very often. He felt that is an area where the Commission should be more involved. Mr. Bullet understood the Commission's concerns. He understood it had been the Co6~nission's intent to be able to focus more on long range planning issues such as the Regional ComprehenSive Plan. He said some of those visionary matters do take quite a bit of staff research time and the Planning staff has been attrited to a point where it will be difficult to maintain the same level of service which has been provided in the past. He commented the Advance Planners are not truly 'advance" planners today as they are all doing Planning Commission Minutes -22- June 8, 1994 140 'current' planning tasks as par~ of their daily duties. He said he would be able to discuss staff resources when the Commission discusses the work program. Coemissioner Lumpp asked if Subdivision Ordinance Amendment 94-01 to amend the time ex~ension provisions was being proposed in order to be consistent with state law. / Mr. Buller responded affirmatively. Motiont Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, to adop~ the resolutions recmnding approval of Development Code ~J~endment 94-02, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 94-03, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 94-01, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 94-01, E~iwenda North Specific Plan amendment 94-01, Victoria Community Plan amendment 94-01, Tetra Vista C~maunity Plan Amendment 94-02, and Subdivision Ordinance Amendment 94-01. Motion carried by the following vote= AYES: NOES: ABSENT COMMISSIONERSz COMMISSIONERS z COMMISSIONERSz BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NONE TOLSTOY -carried The Commissioners cosmended Mr. Coleman for his work on the project. · · · · · OOM~XNTS no public comments at this time. ~COMMISSION 'Commissioner Force would be meet. questioned when the Cultural Resources Mitigation Task Mr. Buller said the should be scheduled within the next two weeks. · · · · · Co~nissioner Melcher distributed of APA would be having their annual Institute of Architects' golf mrs announcing the Inland Empire Section banquet on June 23 and an American be held in August. · · · · · Chairman Barker stated he had asked staff to to do whatever could be done to inhibit destr~ canopy west of Archibald on Foothill Boulevard. him what he could do and the gas station or its Planning Coa~niseion Minutes -23- June 8, 1994 141 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 94-02, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO STREAMLINE THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS, AND MODIFYING THE LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the review process for various development permits. The Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga currently provides regulations for land use and the review of new development permits. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, homeowners, etc. ) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent: a. That the review process should be simplified without compromising the quality of development. b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Planing Commission to focus on broader policy issues. c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough. 2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-49, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt these amendments. 3. On July 20, 1994, the Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Development Code. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 142 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 2 SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, welfare;' and more particularly; 1. To implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to guide and manage the future growth of the City in accordance with such plan; 2. To protect the physical, social, and economic stability of commercial, office and other land uses within the City to assure its orderly and beneficial development; 3. To reduce hazards to the public resulting from the inappropriate location, use, or design of buildings, and other improvements; and 4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning. SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that, based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is not possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3). SECTION 4. Section 17.02.050 is hereby amended to add a new subsection 6 to read as follows: Authority. The City Planner shall exercise that authority set forth in Government Code 65900 et seq. and as set forth hereafter. SECTION 5. read as follows: Section 17.02.100, subsection B, is hereby amended to Extensions. An extension may be X~ granted by the City Planner for lapse of approval for projects described in the previous subsection. ~¢,~ ¢~X;~ ~~ ~ ~M~ ~ ¢¢1~iI~¢~1 Extensions may be granted in twelve (12) month increments and not to exceed a total of four (4) years from the original date of approval, unless otherwise provided for by state law. All requests for extensions should be filed with the City Planner as least lX~ f~l thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. The City Planner ~ FI~X~ ¢~X~lX~ may extend the approval of a project if ~ he finds that there Mi~ have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element, Development Code, or other applicable specific/community plan, character of the area within which the project is located, or 148 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 3 current planning policy or past practice that would cause the approved project to become inconsistent or non-conforming. Also, ~M~ granting of an extension should not be detrimental to the safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. If the City Planner finds that there is significant change, the City Planner shall refer the extension request to the Planning Commission for consideration. SECTION 6. Section 17.02.110 shall be amended to read as follows: Section 17.02.110 Public Hearings and Notification General· A public hearing shall be held prior to action by the City Planner, Planning Commission, or City Council in any of the following cases. These public hearings are conducted in order to encourage public participation and discussion. 1. Any change in the text of this title and/or General Plan. 2. Any change in the District Map. 3. As specifically required by state law (i.e., tentative tract and parcel map, conditional use permits, variances). As determined necessary or desirable by the City Planner, Commission, and/or Council upon the adoption of a resolution setting the time and place for a public hearing. 5. Apartments and/or multi-family projects of four (4) units or more. Authority to Notice Hearings. The City Planner is hereby authorized to advertise and to notice a public hearing as provided in this part for the Planning Commission or City Planner and the City Clerk for the Council when required by this title or when such hearing is considered desirable or necessary in order to carry out the purpose of this title. C. Notice of Filinu. Standard Notice Requirement. At such time as an application for a project which requires a public hearing before the City Planner or the Planning Commission is deemed complete for processing, the City Flanner shall cause notices to be posted conspicuously on the project site not more than 300 feet apart along project perimeter fronting on improved public streets. Each notice shall contain a general description of the project and a copy of any proposed subdivision map or site plan. Such notices shall have the following title in lettering not less than one (1) inch in height: "NOTICE OF FILING." 144 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page '4 2. Supplemental Notice Requirements. ADDlicabilitV: In addition to standard requirements, large 4-foot by 8-foot sign or signs shall be required to be posted at the project site for development related projects in any one of the following circumstances: (1) The proposed development is an infill project with a higher intensity land use than that of the existing neighborhood; or, (2) The proposed infill project requires a General Plan land use amendment; or, (3) The proposed infill project requires an EIR; or, (4) As determined to be necessary and desirable by the City Planner based on the nature of the proposed project. For large projects, the City Planner may determine that more than one sign is necessary. The purpose of the supplemental large sign notice requirement is to notify the community and the neighbors in the affected area early in the review process, allowing the applicant and the City the benefit of citizens' comments during the initial stages of project review. If it is determined upon initial submittal that a large, 4-foot by 8-foot notification sign(s) is necessary, the applicant shall be notified of required sign bonding fees and sign permit filing requirements within 30 days as part of the City's Notice of Complete Application. A $500 cash deposit is required to ensure compliance with the supplemental notification requirements including maintenance and removal of the large notification sign. The project application shall not be deemed complete until the large sign is installed and required cash deposit made. be Siun Criteria/Maintenance. In order to implement the large signs as an effective form of public notification, the following rules and standards shall apply: (1) Siun Size and Specifications. All large sign(s) shall be four feet by eight feet (4' x 8') in size and be constructed to the specifications of Figure 1. The specific project information text on the sign shall be provided by the Planning Division. 145 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 5 De (2) Location and Installation Standards. All large sign(s) shall be installed according to the specifications of Figure 2. The location for the sign(s) on the project site shall be determined by the City Planner. (3) Timing. All large notification sign(s) shall be installed by the applicant at the project site in accordance with the above criteria. Once the project application is deemed complete and all notification sign(s) installed per City standards, the project will be scheduled for Design and Development Review Committee meetings. (4) Sign Removal and Maintenance. All large sign(s) must be kept adequately maintained and remain in place until the final decision on the application has been made or the application is withdrawn. All large sign(s) shall be removed by the applicant within fourteen (14) days of the final decision or date of withdrawal. Failure to remove the sign within the prescribed period may result in forfeiture of the cash deposit and removal of the sign by the City. Notice of Hearing. At least ten (10) days before the public hearing of a project requiring a public hearing, the City Planner shall cause notice of the time and place of the public hearing on the project to be given in the following manner: By publication once in TM~ ~Z~ ~ The Inland Valley DeiXv BuXletin, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. By mail or delivery to all persons, including businesses, corporations or other public or private entities, shown on the last equalized assessment roll as owning real property within 300 feet of the property which is the subject of the project. By posting notices conspicuously on the project site not more than 300 feet apart along project perimeter fronting on improved public streets. Each posted notice shall contain a general description of the project and a copy of any proposed subdivision map or site plan. Said posted notices shall have the following title and lettering not less than one (1) inch in height: "PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING" or "PUBLIC HEARING." 4. Supplemental Notice Requirements. Additional public notification beyond the standard 300-foot boundary shall be 146 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 6 required for a development related project as determined by the City Planner in any one of the following circumstances: a. The proposed development is a residential infill project with a higher intensity land use than that of the existing neighborhood; or, b. The proposed residential infill project requires a General Plan land use amendment; or, c. The proposed residential infill project requires an EIR; or, d. As determined to be necessary and desirable by the City Planner based on the nature of the proposed project. In determining the boundaries of the expanded notification area, the following criteria shall be used. (a) The expanded area may be directly affected by the proposed project due to proposed or established circulation and drainage patterns, or access, view, grading, or other similar considerations; or (b) The expanded area is an integral part of the affected neighborhood or subdivision. If it is determined upon initial submittal that supplemental notification is necessary, the applicant shall be notified, within 30 days as part of the City's Notice of Complete Application, of expanded notification area to be included in the mailings, and shall be required to submit three (3) sets of gummed address labels based on the latest equalized tax assessors rolls for the expanded area. The application shall not be deemed complete until the labels have been submitted. E. Other Notice Requirements. Notices required by this section shall be in addition to any other or different notice required by other provisions of this code or by state law, provided, however, that nothing therein shall require separate notices to be given if the same notice will satisfy the requirements of this section and any other applicable section of this code or state law. F. Effect of Failure to Give Notice. No a6tion, inaction, or recommendation regarding any project by the City Planmer, Planning Commission, or City Council shall be held void or invalid or be set aside by any Court by reason of any error or omission pertaining to the notices, including the failure to 147 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 7 give any notice required by this section, unless the Court after an examination of the entire case shall be of the opinion that the error or omission complained of was prejudicial, ahd that by reason of such error or omission the party complaining or appealing sustained and suffered substantial injury, and that a different result would have been probable if such error or omission had not occurred or existed. There shall be no presumption that error or omission is prejudicial or that injury was done if error or omission is shown. SECTION 7. Section 17.04.030, subsection G, shall be amended to read as follows: Revisions/Modifications. Revisions or modifications of Conditional Use Permits can be requested by the applicant. Further, the Planning Commission may periodically review, modify or revoke a Conditional Use Permit. Revisions/Modifications by applicant· A revision or modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit such as, but not limited to, change in conditions, expansions, intensification, location, hours of operation, or change of ownership, may be requested by an applicant. Such request shall be processed as described in Sections 17.04.030-C through F. The applicant shall supply necessary information as determined by the City, to indicate reasons for the requested change. Periodic Review. ~ FX~ ¢~X~/ The Planning Commission may periodically review any Conditional Use Permit to ensure that it is being operated in a manner consistent with conditions of approval or in a manner which is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. If, after review, the Commission deems that there is sufficient evidence to warrant a full examination, then a public hearing date shall be set. Modification or Revocation. After setting a date for public hearing as described in Subsection 2 above, the City Planner shall notify the applicant and owners of the CUP in question. Such notice shall be sent by certified mail and shall state that the Commission will be reviewing the CUP for possible modification or revocation. It shall also state the date, time and place of hearing. The public hearing shall be conducted and notice given in accordance with Section 17.02.110. The City Planner shall fully investigate the evidence and prepare a report for the Commission's consideration. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, the Commission shall render a decision to do one of the following measures: 148 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 8 ae Find that the CUP is being conducted in an appropriate matter and that no action to modify or revoke is necessary; or, be Find that the CUP is not being appropriate manner and that conditions are necessary; or, conducted in an modifications to Find that the CUP is not being conducted in an appropriate manner and that modifications are not available to mitigate the impacts and therefore revokes the permit which requires the operation to cease and desist in the time allotted by the Commission. If the Planning Commission either modifies or revokes a CUP, then they shall state reasons for such action within the resolution. He New ADDliCatiOnS followinq Denial or Revocation. Following the denial or revocation of a Conditional Use Permit application, no application for a Conditional Use Permit for the same or substantially the same use of the same or substantially the same site shall be filed within one year from the date of denial or revocation. SECTION 8. Section 17.04.035 is hereby added to read as follows: Section 17.04.035 Non-Construction Conditional Use Permits Ae Authority Where there is no exterior construction involved, the City Planner is authorized to grant or deny Conditional Use Permits in accordance with the procedure in Section 17.04.030 and impose reasonable conditions. If in the opinion of the City Planner the application involves unusual requirements or raises questions of land use policy substantially more significant than generally pertain to such application, the City Planner may refer the application to the Planning Commission for consideration. Public Hearing. The City Planner shall hold a public hearing on each application for a Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit. The hearing and notice shall be set and notice shall be given as prescribed in Section 17.02.110 Public Hearings. Revisions/Modifications. Revisions or modifications- of Non- Construction Conditional Use Permits can be requested by the applicant and approved or denied by the City Planner. Further, the City Planner may periodically review, modify or revoke a Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit in accordance with the procedures of Sections 17.04.030.G. 149 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 9 SECTION 9. read as follows: Section 17.06.010, subsection C, is hereby amended to C. Authoritv Planninq Commission Review: Development/Design Review applications which meet any of the following criteria shall require review and consideration by the Planning Commission: ~/ ¢/ ~/ (a) Any project being proposed along a Special Boulevard as defined by the Oeneral Plan, except for structures within projects with an approved master plan as provided for in subsection (b) below. (b) All projects which are master planned. Once the master plan, including architectural guidelines, hem been approved by the Planning Commission, individual structures may be approved by the City Planner. (c) All residential subdivisions. (d) All shopping centers, except individual structures may be approved by the Cit~ Planner where a master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the Planning Commission. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 10 (e) Any project requiring an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS~. (f) All projects of more than ten (10) acres of land. (g) Certain projects within a hillside area are subject to review pursuant to Section 17.24.020.B. The Planning Commission is authorized to approve or deny applications and to impose reasonable conditions upon such approval, subject to the right of appeal. Conditions may include, but shall not be limited to requirements for open spaces, screening and buffering of adjacent properties, fences, and walls; requirements for installation and maintenance of landscaping and erosion control measures; requirements for street improvements and dedications, regulation of vehicular ingress and egress, and traffic circulation; regulation of signs; regulation of hours or other characteristics of operation; requirements for maintenance of landscaping and other improvements; establishment for maintenance of landscaping and other improvements; establishment of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and such other conditions as the Commission may deem necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the Commission to make the findings required by Section 17.06.020-F. City Planner Review: Development/Design Review applications which do not require Planning Commission review as described above shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planner. Although, if in the opinion of the City Planner the application involves unusual site development requirements or unique operating characteristics, or raises questions of development policy substantially more significant than generally pertain to applications for development review and which require Planning Commission consideration, the City Planner may refer the application to the Planning Commission. The City Planner may, contingent upon environmental clearance by the Planning Commission, grant approval or grant approval in a modified form or subject to conditions, or may deny the application. Conditions may include, but shall not be limited to; requirements for open spaces, screening and buffering of adjacent properties, fences and walls; requirements for installation and maintenance of landscaping and erosion control measures; requirements for street improvements and dedications, regulation of vehicular ingress, egress, and traffic circulation; regulation of signs; regulation of hours or other 151 CITY COUNCIL ORDIN~34CE NO. DCA 94-02 - STREAMLINING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS July 20, 1994 Page 11 characteristics of operation; requirements for maintenance of landscaping and other improvements; establishment of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and such other conditions as the City Planner may deem necessary to insure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the City Planner to make the findings required by Section 17.06.0~10-F. The ~X¢~/ Technical, Design, and Grading Review Committees are hereby established to be advisory to the Planning Commission and the City Planner. ~ ~ ¢~ SECTION 10. Section 17.06.010, subsection E, second paragraph, is hereby amended to read as follows: E.I. Develomment/Desiqn Review Procedure 2.II. All development proposals submitted pursuant to this Section are initially reviewed by the ~~/ Technical, Design, and Grading Committees: (1) Design Review Committee - architecture and site planning; (2) Grading Committee - grading and drainage; and (3) ~,~X~ Technical Review Committee - compliance with technical code requirements. Each committee shall make a recommendation on each project for consideration by the Planning Commission or City Planner, if applicable. SECTION 11. Section 17.10.030, Table 17.10.030 Use Regulations For Commercial/Office Districts, subsections A through E, are hereby amended to read in words and figures as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and hereby incorporated by reference. SECTION 12. read as follows: Section 17.04.050, subsection D, is hereby amended to Notification· The City Planner shall notify the applicant and contiguous property owners and other interested parties by ~X~X~ mail ten (10) days prior to the ~X~ FX~ decision Minor Exception request. Said notice shall state the following: 1. Requested action 2. Location of requested action 3. Name and address (parcel and lot number) of applicant 4. Date after which a decision will be made on application 5. Name of City Planner and telephone number of City Mall. 152 wr r'r' ir AI Section 17.10.030 General Comm~eial District (GC): This district is intended for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature. These uses would be located primarily along major transportation routes and would include major shopping facilities, major service-oriented uses, major financial and corporate headquarters which are designed to serve the City or the region as a whole. 5e~tico 17.10.030 Use Regulations Uses listed in Table 17.10.030 shall be allowable in one or more of the commercial districts as indicated in the columns beneath each commercial district. Where indicated with the letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C', the use shall be a conditional use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in eategorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure ~utlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. TABLE 17.10.050 l~B RRGULATION8 FOR COMMRRCIAIJOFFICE D!IrrRICT8 USE OP NC GC A. Offices and Related Uses 1. Administrative and executive offices. P P P 2. Artist and photographic studios, not including the sale of equipment supplies. Clerical and professional offices. Financial services and institutions?/'~/~4~ c~r/'ve - ~4~. ~ . Medical, dental and related health services (non-animal related) including laboratories and clinics; only the sale of articles clearly incidental to the services provided shall be permitted. 6. Prescription pharmacies, (also when located within a building containing the offices of 5 or more medical practitioners) 7. Public buildings (~, city and county buildings, special districts and post office). P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 8. Public utility service offices. 9. Public safety facility (police, ambulance and paramedics). fire, P P P C C C -98- 153 Sec:ion 17.10.030 10. USR Related commercial uses (blueprinting, staiionary, quick copy, etc.) w hen incidental to an office building or complex. General Commercial Uses 1. Antique shop 2. Adult business (see special requirements per Section 17.10,030) OP NC GC P P P P P - C Animal Care Facility (animal hospital, veterinarian, corn mereial kennel, grooming). (a) Excluding exterior kennel, pens, or runs° (b) Including exterior kennel, pens, or runs° 4. Apparel stores. 5. Art, music and photographic studios and supply stores. 6. AppUance stores and repair. 7. Arcades (see special requirements per Section 17.10,030 F.) 8. Athletic and Health Club, gyms and weight reducing clinics. 9. Automotive _~ s~)erviees (including motorcycles, boats, trailer and earnper) (a) sales (b) rentals (e) repairs (m~'~r ~ngihe work, muffler shops, painting, body work and upholstery) (d) Coin-op washing (e) Automatic washing C P P C - p P /C~'~ p C C P P P C C C C C C C -99- 154 Sect[an L?. tO.03;] 10. 11. 12. USE (f) Service or gasoline dispensing stations (including minor repair such as tune-ups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers) OP NC GC C C P - p P P P P - p P P P P (other tavern) (g) Parts and supplies Bakeries (retail only). of a Barber and beauty shops. Indoor uses. such as bowHug, theaters, billards, Bicycle shops. 13. Blueprint and photocopy services q-4f'l~k~-~n er se vices. 15. Book, gift and stationary stores than adult related material). 16. Candy store~ and confectionaries. 17. Catering establishments. 18. Cleaning and pressing establishments. 19. Carpenter shop or cabinet shop. 20. Cocktail lounge (bar, lounge, including related entertainment. (a) Operated independent restaurant (b) Aeee~ory to a restaurant 21. Commercial recreation facilities. (a) (b) Outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, basketball, baseball, trampolines, etc. ~. Con~ract~ ds storak, t~equi~Y~,_-- -~ 23. Dairy product stores, C P P P P - p P P - p C C C C C C P C C C P P - oo- 155 Section 17.10.030 USE OP 24. De_Dartment stores. - 25. Drive-in businesses, ineluding theaters. - (other than fast food restaurants) 26. Drug stores and pharmacies. 27. Equipment rental yards. f~;~' - 28. Fast-food restaurants ' C 29. Feed/Tack stores - 30. Florist shops. P 31. Food stores and supermarkets. - 32. Furniture stores, repair and upholstery. - 33. General retail stores. - 34. Hardware stores. - 35. Home improvement centers. (a) Material stored and sold within - enclosed buildings (b) Outdoor storage of material such as - lumber & building materials 36. Hotels and ~otels. 37. Ice Machines (outdoor). 38. Janitoral services and supplies. 39. Jewelry stores. 40. Laundry-self-service. 41. I~iquor stores. 42. Kiosks for key shops, film drops, etc. in parking lots. 43. Locksmith shop. 44. ~ini-storage for public use (no outdoor storage). NC GC - p C C P P - C C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P P P P P C -101- 156 Section 17.10.030 USE OP NC GC C C C _ _ ~ - //P gF P 45. M~tuaries and cemeteries. 6.~.6.,/~rcy~-le sal~ an,~ .~ervie~. 47. Newspaper and magazine stores inting ~ p,.blishi~._ 48. Nurseries and garden supply stores; provided, in the NC district, all equipment, supplies and material are kept within an enclosed area; ~::/~r, ~,'~~ 49. Office and business machine stores. 50. Parking facilities (commercial) where fees are charged. 51. 52. Political or philanthrop_i_e_headqUar_ters. Pet shop. 53. Plumbing shop and supplies. 54. Photocopy 55. Printing shops. Restaurants (other than fast food). (a) With entertainment and/or setvital of aleeholic bevore6~ co, k~ I~, i~rr, (b) Incidental serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment or dancing Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard. 58. Shoe storM, sale and repair. 59. Second-hand stores and pawn shops. 60. Shopping Center subject to provisions in Beetion 17.10.030-F.5. 61. SpirituRlimt readings or astrology forecasting. 62. Sporting goods stores. 63. Stamp and coin shops. C P P P P C P P P P P P P P P P ) C ~, P P C P P P -102- 157 SeeLion :_T.: 3, UI~!~. OP NC GC 64. Swimming pool supplies. - P P 65. Tailor. - P P 66. Taxidermists. - - p 69. Toy stores. - P P 70. Travel agencies. P P P 71. Transportation facilities (train and bus, C C C taxi depots). 72. Truck and trailer rental, sales and service. C 73. Variety stores. - P P ~hieul-~st~l~age yard ~.,,ZF[SWlng C. Public and semi-public uses 1. Day Care Facilities 2. Convalescent facilities 3. Private and public clubs and lodges, including YMCA, YWCA and similar youth group uses. C C C g,p _ C C C Educational institutions, parochial, private (including colleges and universities). 5. Libraries & museums, public or private. C C C 6. Parks and recreation facilities, public or private. C C C 7. Public utility installations. C C C 8. Vocational or business trade schools. C C C 9. Churches, convents, monasteries and other religious institutions. C C C -103- 158 Section 17.10.030 USII Accessory Uses 1. Acessory structures and uses customarily incidental to a permitted use and contained on the same site. 2. Accessory structures and uses customarily incidental to a conditional use and contained on the same site. OP NC GC P P P C C C 3. Caretakers residence j~ JL~/p P 4. Amusement Devices, per Section ~F P P 17.10.030-F. Teml~orary Uses 1. Temporary uses as prescribed in Section P P P 17.04.070 and subject to those provisions. 2. Temporary office modules, subject to C C C provisions in Section 17.10,030-F.4. Sl~ecial Use Relrulations Adult Businesses. In consideration of approval of any adult business, as defined in Chapter 17.02, a Conditional Use Permit shall be approved for an adult business in the GC District subject to all the standard development requirements unless: (a) Such business is located within 1,000 feet of a college or university, a public or private.educational facility, a church, a park or reereational facility, a library, a post office, or a governmental institution. (b) Such business is located less than 1,000 feet of any other adult business. (c) Such business is located less than 1,000 feet from any property in a residential zone or within 1,000 feet of any group of 5 or more dwellings in any other zone. Amusement Devices. The use of amusement devices, as defined in Chapter 17.02, as an accessory use to a permitted use, shall be regulated based on the foliowing criteria. (a) No more than three (3) devices, but not to exceed five percent (5%) of the public floor area, may be permitted per business without approval of a conditional use permit. Each machine and playing area occupies a minimum of ten (10) square feet. -104- 159 ORDINANCE NO. 5~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03, AMENDING THE LAND USE TYPES, LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS, AND THE LAND USES WITHIN VARIOUS SUBAREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the review process for certain land uses. The Industrial Area Specific Plan currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent: a. That the review process should be simplified without compromising the quality of the development. b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues. c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough. 2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above- referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-50, recommending that the City Council adopt these amendments. 3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more particularly: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 2 1. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and 2. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and 3. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and 4. That the proposed environmental impact; and amendment will have no significant 5. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). SECTION 4: The Industrial Area Specific Plan text, Part III, Table III-1 "Summary of Land Use Types by Subarea," commencing on page III-5, is hereby amended to read as attached, and all lists of permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Part IV, Subarea Development Standards are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION 5: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-14, the definition for "Entertainment" is hereby amended to read as follows: Entertainment: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: ~X~X/ ~Z~X~ ~ entertainment services, excluding adult entertainment, within an enclosed building to assembled groups of spectators ~ or participants, as well as activities typically performed at private and non-profit clubs and lodges. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: dance halls, motion picture theaters, and meeting halls. 161 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 3 SECTION 6: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection E, page III-16, is hereby amended to add a new land use type to read as follows: Convention Centers: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, conferences, seminars, product demonstrations, and tournaments within an enclosed building for assembled groups or spectators or participants. Uses typically include convention centers and exhibition halls. SECTION 7: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection E, page III-16, the definition for "Cultural" is hereby amended to read as follows: Cultural: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, those performed by or at the following institutions or installations: - Public and private performing arts centers (i.e., music, dance, drama) not including nightclubs; - Public and private ~~X~ museums and art galleries; - Public and private ~~ libraries and observatories. SECTION 8: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-11, the definition for "Automotive Rental/Leasing" is hereby amended to read as follows: Automotive Rental/Z~: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the rental ~ ~X~ from the premises of motor vehicles, with provision of incidental maintenance services. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, car rental agencies ~ X~X~ ~X~- On-site storage ~ ~~ ~ ~X~X~ ~ ~X ~ X~ shall not occupy more than 25 percent of the required parking for the subject building suite, unless approved with a Conditional Use Permit. SECTION 9: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-12, the definition for "Automotive Sales" is hereby amended to read as follows: Automotive Sales and LeasinQ: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the display, ~ sale, or leasing of new and used automobiles, trucks, and recreational vehicles, minor automotive repair, ~~ ~ ~, and installation of accessories. Uses typically include car dealerships with service departments. 162 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 4 SECTION .10: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-11, is hereby'amended to add a new land use type to read as follows: Adult Entertainment: Activities typically include, but are not limited tol adult entertainment establishments as defined by the Development Code. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, adult book stores, adult motion picture establishments, adult mini-motion picture theaters, adult motion picture arcades, adult drive-in theaters, adult cabarets, adult motels or hotels, adult theaters, adult model studios, sexual encounter establishments, and body painting studios. SECTION 11: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-14, is hereby amended to delete, in its entirety, the definition for "Eating and Drinking Establishments." SECTION 12: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection D, page III-16, is hereby amended to add the following new land use types to read as follows: Restaurants: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail sale, from the premises, of unpackaged food or beverages generally prepared for on-premises consumption. Uses typically include, but are not limited tol restaurants with incidental serving of beer and wine, cafeterias, and delicatessens; and exclude fast food type services, cocktail lounges, bars, entertainment, or dancing. Restaurants with bar or entertainment: Activities typically include, but are not limited tol the retail sale, from the premises, of unpackaged food or beverages, including hard liquor, generally prepared for on-premises consumption. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: restaurants with hard liquor sales, dancing, or entertainment; cocktail lounges; and bars. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 5 SECTION 13: Part III, Table III-2, Subsection E, page III-17, is hereby amended to add the following new land use types to read as follows: Day Care Facility: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: establishments for non- medical care to infants and preschool and school age children under 18 years of age during a portion of the day. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: infant centers, nursery schools, pre- schools, and similar facilities. Schools~ Activities typically include, but are not limited to: public and private educational institutions. Uses typically include, but are not limited to= vocational or business trade schools, colleges, and universities. SECTION 14: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. TABLE II1-1 SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA USE TYPES MANUFACTURING Custom Light Medium Heavy Minimum Impact Heavy OFFICE PROFESSIONAL, DESIGN & RESEARCH: Administrative & Office p Professional/Design Services p Research Services WHOLESALE, STORAGE & DISTRIBUTION Puiglic Storage Light Medium Heavy .MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITIES. Collection Facilities Processing Facilities Scrap Operation CIVIC~ · ' Administrative Civic Services Cultural Extensive Impact Utility Facilities Flood Control/Utility Corridor Public Assembly Public Safety & Utility Services Religious Assembly P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C C C P C P P P P P p P P P P P P P P P P P/~' C P C C P P ~/5 C P C C P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P P P P P C C C C C P C C P C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P P C P P p p p p p p C P C P P P P P P P P P P P P P C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P ct~' c ,s/,¢'' ~'jd/ C C C C PPPPPe'PPP P PF'PPPPPP c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C c C CGC, GCCc.-CC c;ccCC Cc' C cCcccc cc c-c,c,c C cc ep - Indult"iM PBrk ,,.K:) - HmvenOvedayl:)isO,icl GI - Gef'wf,al Indusmal MI/HI - kinimum iml:lcl Heavy IndusWiml HI - i-leevylnduswWt p PemlmldUm C Condlmion~ly Penneed Uee ~ - Non-mmMd~nmPenNmcl 3.65 , ,..,a~.c mlP I ~,OrltlfilJeQ) SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA Agricultural/Nursery Supplies &Services p p p p p p p p Animal Care c C, c c C c c c Automotive Fleet Storage c C c C Automotjve RentaVLea~ieg Automotive/Light Truck Repair-Minor p p_g. P f,g, f~ I~p P P P Automotive/Truck Repair-Major P C P ~ P P C C C Automotive Sa es c c c Automotive Service Court Automotive ServiceStation c c C C C c C C c c c c Building Contractors Office &Yards p P~ p J~ f'g p p p p p p Building Contractor's Storage Yard Building Maintenance Service p p p p p p p p p p p p Building & Light Equipment Supplies & Sales p c P c c P P c P c c P Business Supply Retail &Services p p p p p p p p p p p p p BusinessSupport Services p P c P P c p P p 4~ c P P P p IIP P Communication Services P P P P P P P P P 4V ~' p p p p 4e p p ConvenienceSales & S.e. rvices c c c ;if'J/I c C lit il 4tC c 41[ if ~ c c Entertainment c c c c c Extensive Impact Commercial C FastFoodS ales C fl c c C c Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services p [',~' Food &Beverage Sales c c IF cl c 4 c c c Funeral & Crematory Services c c Heavy Equipment Sales &Rentals C C cir C C 41' C Hotel/Motel P/g' p p Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial C c c Laundry Services P P uedicaVHealth Care Services Personal Services___ c c Petroleum Products Storage Recreation Facilities Repair Services P P C P P P P Specialty Building Supplies & Home imgxovwnent ~ e~ c ~ e s't't u c ~J~'h~ C C C C C C cc#cc ccp ccP / P, P P P C P Permlttm:l Use Condition~lly Permitted Use Noe~-m"nmm~e:l Usem Na~ P.rrnitted 166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The purpose and intent of this Resolution is to streamline the review process for certain land uses. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, thLe Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent: a. That the review process should be simplified without compromising the quality of the development. b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues. c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough. 2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above- referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-51, recommending that the City Council adopt these amendments. 3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more particularly: 167 D~JUIIImL. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FBSPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 2 l. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 2. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 3. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; 4. That the proposed environmental impact; and amendment will have no significant 5. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Resolution will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed Resolution is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). SECTION 4: The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan text, Part IV, Section 9, commencing on page IV-9.4a, is hereby amended to read as attached, and all lists of permitted and conditionally permitted uses in Subareas 1, 2, 3, and 4 are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect. 168 SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED IPI AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED (C1 USES RETAIL COrlr'IERCIAL USES :i:ii.i:::iZ~ SuParea One...:i% Subarea Two ~Sii~!i~SC CC 0 t'IR P ': i':SC CC O .~lp r'I, HR Antidue 5noDs ........ p/2 .~.~ p p :: :::::::: ....... ':'::i:::i:i. a) Boutlaues P P D) Genera I :i~:i:2i:- P P i:~:. P P ::::.~!ii Appliance Stores and Repair Art, nuslc, Photograpmc 5tuo~os -: :-::~: : ::: and SUpply Stores :::::~::z~:~ pp Auto Service 5tation :::: C C ::~::~ : :: :~:~ ' ':: C C: 'AUTO Service (Including trailers, :it:::::: motorcycles, DOatS, campers). :~::~:i:ii:i::~ a) 5ales (with ancillary repair ::!~:j~i!i :~:~i~ :~::~i:::::iii .:-:.:.:.:.: .... .......... :?:~E!i .... c) rnnor Repair (does not Include major engine work, muffler :.!- ,,.. upholstery, etc.) :'::~:~:~:~:i e) Automatic washing f) Darts and Sueplies ...... :: p '::::::: p .... ::::::: Bakeries (retail only) D P BorDer and Beauty 5r, cps p p p Bed and Breakfast C C BIcycle 5Pops p p BlueprlPt and PhOtOCOpy Services P P BOOk, Gl't and Stationary Stores (cther tPan adult related ma,'erlal} Candy and Confectlonerles Catering EstaDIIshmentS China aria Glassware 5totes Chrtstmas Tree/Pumpkin 5ales Lots (oPerating on a temporary Dasls) Churches DDD Cleanlnq and Presslnd Establlshments::ii::i~iii!! P P p CoCktail Lounge (Par, lounge.tavern) including related entertainment ?ii C Commercial Recreation: a) indoor uses Such as I~owllng and Dillorals o.taoor uses sup. and DasketDall i~::::~ Convalescent Facilities and HOSOItalSi Curtain and Drapery ShoOS Day Care Centers Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores p Drug Stores and Pharmacies a) over I 0,000 so. rt, :'=:i:ii D) Pharmacies with or without =.Ti~ii[:.ii:: specialty retail under I0,000 sq. ft. C Revised: I I/3/gl C C C C P CCC P P P P P P C D p P P C C ~5~:~ 5uDarea Three ::ii~::iiiZii 5uDarea Four ~:!!'~:5C CC CO Lr'IR ~P U r'IUi!i!::~!~i~!!iCC RRC ~IR L~ ~ii::::::ii ::::::::sEt: :::::: ..:: :.:,:. ::i:::5 ....... P P P P P ,2"p P P P C C P P D p p p i~:~::E PP :i::~i:::: PP P . :.:. ::::::::::: ..,,...,. ...,.,.-. .:::::::: :7:!:!: p :' "::i:!:] p E: ':~:~E :::::::: i~iiiiiiiic c c c ::~::i!i]i~i c c c c ,.....:. .,-... .::.:-:. ! c c c c c c :::.:.:~ : ;:.::.> :::::::::::: ,...-.,.. ...-...... -...::.: -.-....... ...... ...,..,. ! c c :,!i!!i::!::i::ic .:~: .i:~ : :~: C C C C ::,~:i::i~: C C C ::':: :~-::!:i:i L:!! ~ p i::ii[?i PP P :[~:3:. ,: :ii:~. ::~:i:~P :'::'*~ . ':::... : 3:] :j: j::.~:~:~:3 · :]Z~ ~]::~::~:::: C :.:C ~V-g4 ¢~ D D C C 169 SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED (PI AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITrED (C1 USES RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES ( CONT, ) ~'~v',, ~ ~ , c.~ ~, ) Educational Institutions, P~;ochlai, Private (Including Col leges and universities) Farmers ~arkets Floor Covering ShoPs Florlst Shops Furniture Stores Hardware Stores Health and Athletic Gyms and weight Reducing Clinics HODDV Shops Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains Janltorlal Services and Supplies Jewelry Stores Laundry (Self Service) Leather GOodS and Luggage Stores LlDrarles and r'luseumso puPlit and private LIquor Stores nessenger and WIre Services ~1ortuarles and Cemetarles rluslc, Dance, and hlartlal Arts Studios Newspaper and rlagazlne Stores Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores within enclosed area Office. Business rlachlne and ~cl~,o,rn~te5 C orient Stores Parking Faclll=les (commercial wnere::~;~;~E:~ tees are charged) and private .:?~:~:~:~: PhOtOCOpy (Xerox) PolitIcal or PhllanthroDIc Head~uarte~ ~uDIIc and Private CluDs and LodgeS, ~:"' ReCord and Tape Stores Recreational vehicle Storage Yards Restaurants (sit down): D) InCIdental se~lng of Deer and :~::~:~ wine (wlthogt a cocktail Ioung~::~ bar, entertainment or dancing) c) Care, limited to 20 seats :~ a) Fast Food: with arlve-thru without arlve-thru Revised I I/]/gl ' ' :i:~i~i~ "' · :::':: '::::::::: :~:~:~:! ::~:::~:~:~ :::;::::: ' ..... :.:::::::::: ::-:<.:.:,: "'-" :: ::i::? · :.::.:::::: p ....... p p ::~'~:~:!:Z: p p .:'~:!:!:!. i"""""' ':'::':':' :-:: ': "'-" ::i.~:! .:i~::i~!! :: :::': ":':::':: :~ i:i:i:~ ::~?~:!:!:i .:.:-:.:.:. :' :.:~ ~:~ ' . C - C C ::~ C C C C C P 170 SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED (p) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITrED (C} USES RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES (toni.) Shoe Stores and Repair Shops Specialty Retail Sporting Goods 5totes: a) 5petlaity, Packpacking, tennis, skIIng, Mountaln- eerlng, FIShing. etc. b) General, encompassing a variety of Sports eaulpment SuPermarkets 5wlmmlna DO01 Services and Supplies''ii:~? Tailor ShOpS TOy Stores Variety Department Stores. ~unlor Department Stores veterinary (comestic; a) Non-boarding D) Boarding Vocational or Business Trade SChOOlS WatCh and Clock Repair Stores Yardado Goods 5totes i:~ii~iiiii~ SuParea Oneii:!~:i:i SuParea TwO ~!!~iiij~ii~iSC CC 0 ~'IR P ii:~Ei!~:SC CC 0 MR MHR ..... .,. · :: ::: :: · . ... ..., ::'!::'2?Z :.::.:.:. :::.: ::~:~:E D SuParea Three -.E:!:~i~i~Subarea Four iEi. i!:!~/SC CC CO LMR MR U MUiiiiiEii~i!~iCC RRC MR LI ~P 2D :' PD ~P ~ pp C~ C~ CP pC 'PC po C C CC pp O~ ppp D p P ENTERTAINMENT AND CULTURAL USES Arcades 7!:;i~::!ii C C Cultural/ArtiSt ExhibitS: a) ~ndoor Gallery and Art Sales :~iiii~::!::ii P b) OutdOor Art Exhibits D lSCOthedueS :i:i;i;~ii~ C C T n e a t e r s: a) DInner Theater b) MOvie Theater lncludlnq i'~ultlp|~ ~'t ........... Subarea 0ne~i~i~ii:::::i SuParea Two :~!i::/:::iii Subarea Three !!:i:'.~ii~i 5ubarea Four · ::i!i~::ii::::sc cc o MR p !::!iii:i:!sc cc o ~R MHn:i!?~i~i:i~SC CC CO LMR MR U MUi!iiiiii~!ii~iGC RRC MR L, OFFICE AND ADffilNISTRATIVE USES A<~mlnlstratlve, Business, and Professional Offices Banks. FInance Se v~c s and w I'hOUt drlve-thru Business and Office Services enterlot Decorat Ing FIrms Memcal/Dental Offices and Related Health Clinics Optician and Optometrlcal Shops Realtors anO Real Estate Offices Travel Aqencles Revised I I/3/91 :i:i:::' Subarea On~i!i~i::::::i:: Subarea Two i~iii::iii::i::iiSubarea Three .~i::ii::~::::ii Subarea Four i~SC CC 0 MR P '::~i~!!~i~SC CC O MR MHRi~!~ii::~::~ii::iSC CC CO LMR MR U MU:::~iEE!i~i!?:CC RRC MR LI .. :.,.,::<. · .-.-... .... :..:.:.:: .:. ::;:.~;~ nn n :.:.':.:. nn n ~2:~:::~ ~P ~ C :~:s:~: ~ P · . :~E~::~:: p P P ~'~:: p P ~:~E~: p P :': ..... · :-:.x.:-: ..~.~: ::::::::.:: .::~:~:~:E:~: P ..... P P P :: p P P P P P P ':~:~::~ p p- IV-9.4 P p p p p 171 SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED (P) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED (C1 USES RESIDENTIAL USES SIngle Family Detached SIngle Family AttaChed (duplex, triplex, fourplex) Multi-Family Dwellings Ancillary Residential USES: a) Home-care Facilities (6 or less) D) On-site Prlvate Recreation Facilities AcceSsory Uses: a) Accessory Structures D) Home Occupation .T::~i::i~i SuParea One:-:,E:!:= 5uDarea Two :=::i:!!.i~i SuParea Three :i:.iiiii~!::i SuParea Four :::.~!:.ii::i~!!~5C CC 0 r~R P :':' /TiSC CC 0 r"'R r"'IHRi~:.i~ii~iii~i~5C CC CO L~R ~R U r""lUi;::::::!::iiii!!CC RRC P1R Lr ': .......... :~ "::.E:~fi~:i~T i!::i::i~::::!:::::: ::....:.:.: :: ~::::: ,,,,,,,.., ::: E:::EE E : ::::::::::::: : ::2: ::.:: :iEi~ :.:.:.:.:.:,: "'::': ':: :: iZ~: :' :'::': :ii!E:!~i! : :: ,.: ::.::::::::: .......... ' P ........... P P .............. ~ D P ............ P ., ... .::: .:, +:.:,:+: PUBLIC USES Transit Facilities PublIC Utility Installations HOTEL USES ::i:~i:.:::i~i:: SuP area On es:!EE::i~ Subarea Two ~ii::::::ii~ii::i!SuParea Three i&::::::i::i::F~SuUarea Four :~iiiii SC cC o r~n P iii?iiii!~i~i~:SC CC 0 ,R MHniiiiii:iii~i)SC CC CO Lnn ,n U .u;~i~!~i~CC RRC ,n u ""' """ '!:~:!:~?i ::.:::::::::: Newspaper/MagaZIne Stores iii!ii)!{!i~ :~ii~i~i!~!:: .......... P 0 I NDUSTRI AL USES i:iiiiii~ SuParea Onei!!]!i!.ii Subarea Two .EES:::::iii~i;i 5uDarea Three :j:iii!iiiii:: SuParea Four ::~!i!!ii!!!SC CC 0 MR P :ii:i::!i~SC CC O PIR MHRTii:'i!~!~i:!i~!SC CC CO LMR I'IR U r'IUiiii~;~ii!iiiCC RRC r'lR LI All InduStrial uses and development standards snail De as provided In Sup-area 7 of the ~ndustrlal Area Specific Plan (15P). 0 Refer to RRC (" ) Section 9.9.2 Revised- 1113191 Iv-g 4 d 172 ORDINANCE NO. .6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the review process for certain land uses. The Etiwanda Specific Plan currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent: a. That the review process should be simplified without compromising the quality of the development. b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues. c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough. 2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above- referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-52, recommending that the City Council adopt these amendments. 3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more particularly: 173 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ESPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 2 1. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 2. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 3. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; 4. That. the proposed environmental impact; and amendment will have no significant 5. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). SECTION 4: The Etiwanda Specific Plan text, Part Two, Chapter 5, Section 5.23.203, commencing on page 5-11, is hereby amended to read as attached. SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 174 USE NC Administrative, business, and professional offices ............... P Ambulance services ............... - Antique shops .................... P Amusement enterprises such as fairs, merry-go-rounds, ferris wheels or earousels, and simils. r uses operated on a temporary basis .................. C Apparel stores ................... p Art and artist~ supply stores ......... p Art galleries and stores selling objects of art ........................... p Automobile rental agencies ........... Automobile repairme, ovc~haulins, rsb'~ildi.~, and painting, including body and fender slmops) .................. Automobile sales and service agencies.. _ Automobile supply stores ........... p Automobile upholstery and top shops Automobile washing, including use of mechanical conveyors, blowers~ and steam cleaners .................... Automobile washing, self-servic~ ..... C Bakeries, baking of items for sale on premises only .................... p Barber shop and beauty shops ........ p Bicycle shops .................... p Blueprint and photocopy services ...... p Book stores ..................... p Bowling alleys .................... 5-11 CC P P P P P P P DISTRICT FC C C GC P C P C P P P P P P P C C P P P P P OP P C 175 REVISED USE Business and office services ......... Camera and photography shops and studios ......................... Candy stores and confectionaries ...... Carpet and rug sales and installation . .. Catering services ................. China and glassware stores .......... Christmas tree sales lots operated on a temporary basis .................. Churches ....................... Cigar stores and smoke shops ........ Cleaning estalMishments and laundries, seg-serviee or coin-operated ......... Cleaning and laundering services and pick-up agencies without bulk cleaning.. Cocktail lounges .................. Cur~a~' ~ aper~ s~o . ~ ......... Delicatessens and specialty food stores. Department stores, junior..' ......... Drug stores and pharmacies .......... Electrical equipment sales and repair shops .......................... Electronic parts and equipment sales... Equipment rental agencies with no outside storage ................... Financial institutions, including banks, savings and loan associations, finance companies, and eredR unions ......... Floor coverings shops .............. 5-12 NC P P P P P P P C P P P P P C P P P P CC P P P P DISTRICTS FC P P P GC P P P P P P P C P P P P P P P P OP P P C C P 176 USE Florists ....................... Food stores ..................... Furniture repair and upholstery shops. · · Furniture stores .................. Gift shops and greeting card shops ..... Glass replacement and repair shops .... Hardware stores and home improvement centers ........................ Heating and ventilating shops, not including sheet metal fabrication ...... Hobby shops ..................... Hotels and motels ................. Household appliance sales and repair shops .......................... Ice eream stores and soda fountains .... Interior deeorating shops ............ Janitorial services and supplies ....... Jewelry stores ................... Leather goods and luggage stores ...... Linen supply services .............. Liquor stores .................... Locksmiths ..................... Medical and dental offices and clinics .. Messenger services ................ Mortuaries ...................... Motorcycle sales and services ........ Music and dance studios ............ Music stores NC P P P P P P P P P P P P C P (2{'~ P CC P P P C P C P DISTRICT FC P GC P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P OP P P P P C 177 USE DISTRICT Musical instrument repair shops ....... Nurseries and garden supply stores in a building or fully screened enclosure with no fertilizer products in bulk form ..... Nurseries and garden supply stores ..... Office and business machine stores .... Optician and optometrical shops ...... Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores ..... Pet and bird stores ................ Phonograph record stores ........... Photographic developing and printing... Pinball and electronic games arcades... Printing, publishing, lithography, and engraving ....................... Private recreation buildings, or facilities Public utility or public service structures and installations .................. NC CC FC GC OP P - _ p - P P P P - _ p P P - _ p P P - p p - _ p p - _ p p - _ p p - p P C - - C _ _ _ p C - - C C - - p Radio, stereo, and television sales and repair ......................... p - _ p Realtors and real estate offices ....... p p p p p Restaurants '~ ~ ,~A/. ~ ~e~ 7~,~rv;H,~ o~ ~ ~d ~2~ e/~u~ ~~ C~ ~ 7/ov~ e~ ~ Restaurants having drive-in, drive- through, or walk-up service .......... ~t'/ Restaurants, cocktail loun~es,,~or other establishments providing live entertainment ................... Secretarial services ............... c - c - p - _ p P 5-14 178 USE Service~stations(~.~t.~..~:y. ~. ~.~.~. :¢f~. ,c. ~.~.~.~ Shoe s~ores 8rid shoe reps~r shops ...... Spor~in~ ~oods s~o~es .............. S~sfionery s~ores ................. Swim m in~ pool service and sales ...... Tailo~ shops ..................... Theaters and auditoriums within buildin~ ....................... Toy s~o~es ...................... T~avel agencies ~d bureaus ......... T~ewfite~ s~es and service estabUshments ................... V~iety sto~es ................... Vete~ina~ian's offices and small anim~ hospitals, including sho~t te~m boaMin~ of anim~ and jncident~ ca~e such ~ bathing ~d ~immin¢, with ~ ope~atiom conduct~ within a Ourdin8 which ~ completely enclosed, soldproofed, and ai~ conditioned ................... Watch ~d clock ~ep~ sho~ ......... Wholesale busine~ establishmenm without w~ehousin8 o~ distribution .... Y~daCe goo~ sto~es .............. NC C P P P P P P P DISTRICT CC P P P P FC GC P P P P P P P P P P P OP C P P 5-15 179 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the review process for certain land uses. The Etiwanda North Specific Plan currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent: a. That the review process should be simplified without compromising the quality of the development. b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues. c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough. 2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above- referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-53, recommending that the City Council adopt these amendments. 3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more particularly: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ENSPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 2 1. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 2. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 3. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; 4. That the proposed environmental impact; and amendment will have no significant 5. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). SECTION 4: The Etiwanda North Specific Plan text, Part III, Section 10, Development Regulations, Table 4, "Use Regulations for Neighborhood Commercial Districts," commencing on page III-10, is hereby amended to read as attached. SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 181 TABLE 4 - USE REGULATIONS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMIVfERCL4/, DISTRICTS Office and commercial uses listed below are permitted only wir. hm a shopping center. All shopping centers are subject to a Conditional Use Permit and Development Cede Section 17.10.050-F.S. The appropriate market studies and lot consolidazion, as determined by the City Planner, are required in accordance with Section 6.2.2.1. A. Offices and Related Uses 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. USE I NC 5. 6. 7. 8. Admini~xative and executive offices. Artist and photographic .studies, not including the sale of equipment or supplies. Clerical and professional offices. Medical, dental and relaxed health services (non4nimal relaxed) includin2 laboratories and clinics; only the sale of articles clearly incidental to the services provided artall be permitted. 6. Prescription plmrmm:ies, (also when locsmd within a building containing the off~ces of 5 or more medical prmctitioners). 7. Pubtic buildings (l~X~2~, city and county buildings, special districts and pog office). 8. Pubtic utility service offices. 9. Pubtic safety f~cijjty (police, fire, smbulance and parsmedics). 10. Reinled commercial uses C01ueprilltillZ, stsgionery, qll~lr COpy, et~.) when incidental to me office building or complex. General Commercial Uses Antique shOps Adult business Animal Care Fscility (nnimsl hospital, vemrinarisn, commercisl kennel, yoomi-l). (n) Excluding exUwior kenml, pens, or tans. (b) Includiq exterior kennel, pens, or rum. Appm~l stores. Art, mumc sad photoZrephic mulios and supply norst. Arcades (see special requirements per Developmeug Code Section 17.10.030 F). Aghletic and Hemlth Club, gyms and weight reducing clinics. III-10 182 TABLE 4 - USE REGULATIONS FOR ,NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS (CONTL'N'UED) USE Aummonv~s~rv~ces (including motorcycles, born, trmler ~,,d c~mper) (a) sales (b) rentals (c) repmrs (mjor eniine work, muffler shops, pmmr, ing, body work and upholstery. (d) Automatic Washing (e) Service or gasoline dispensing stations (including minor repair such as tuneups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers) (f) Parts and supplies i0. Broketin (retail only). 11. B~rber mzd beszzt~ shops. 12. Bicycle shops. 13. Blueprint m~d phoux:opy services. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Book, gift am1 moocry stores (odaer tires adult ~1~ m~). ~y ~m ~ co~Uomu. ~mg ClOg ~ p~ ~~enu. C~ l~e ~. 1~, m~ ~1~ ~ e~e~ (a) ~ ~~m of a ~~ IZI-11 c c P P P P P P P C C P 183 TABLE 4 - USE REGULATIONS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMM]ERCIAL DISTRICTS (CONTINI/ED) USE 24. Drive-in businesses, excluding theszers (other than fur food restaura. ms). ?.5. Drug stores znd pharmacies. 26. Fur-food restaurants. 27. FeedFr~ck stores 28. Florist shops. 29. Foat stores and supermukets. 30. Furmture scores. 3 1. General retail stores. 32. I-lardwsre stores. 33. Home improvement cenmn (a) Mazefiat stored and sold within enclomd buudinp (b) Outdoor storage of mazerials such as lumbsr and building mrials. 34. Ice Macbinn (outdoor). 35. lamtorial services and supplies. 36. Iewelry stor~. 37. Lsundry-~!f-servic,. 3S. Liquor smr~. 39. Kiosks for ir~y shops, film dro~s, etc. in pro'king lots. 41. Newspiper and mip-h~ stores. 42. Nurseries and 8arden supply stor~s; provided all equipment, supplies, and material am P.L~t within an enclosed ar~. 45. Po"dcal or philanthropic headqutrmre. 46. Pet sheg. 47. lYaoU>copy NC C P C P P P P P P P P Ili-12 184 TABLE 4 - USE REGULATIONS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTKICTS (CONTINL'ED) 49. 50. ~1. ~2. ~3. Restaurants (other ~an fast food). (a) USE oc, ck4"=,,'l /~" ~, b,,,,'," With entertainment and/or sm-vi~g of ,l~h~;c bcvc..gss Incidental serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment or dancing Shoe stores, sales and repair. Sporting goods stores. Stamp and coin shops. Swimming pool supplies. Tailor. T~lev~sl~n. r~,.lit, ~-~;~ and s_-,-vice. 55. Toy stores. 56. Travel agencies. 57. Transportation facilities (tram and bus, taxi depots). 58. Vtne~/stores. C. Public and semi-t~ublic uses 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. g. Day Care Fzilities Privax~ and public clubs and lodge,, including YMCA, Y~'CA asl similar youth group uses. Educational in~tutions, par~,i-~, privam ('m~!uding co!legu and universities). [iblll~es alld museums, public or privam. Parks and recreation fncilitiM, public or privam. Public utilit7 iastallations. Vocational or busram trs~ schoots. C'hur~hss, r, omv~uts, mouastm, i~ and other r~ii gious ius~mtious. D. Accessory Uses 1. Accessory sm~cntr~ ~xl usas ctwom~ily incidental to · !~rmitmd m and conmin~ on th~ sams sim. 2. Acce~ory su~ctur~ and u~s ¢ustomsrily incidtntal to a conditiona/us~ and contam~i on tht saint sits. NC C P P P P P P P C P C C C C C C C P C III-13 185 TABLE 4 - USE REGULATIONS FOR NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTR/CTS (CONTINUED) USE Amusement Devices, per Development Code Section 17.10.030-F. E. Temz>orarv Uses Temporary uses as prescribed in Development Code Section I7.04.070 and subject to those provisions. 2. Temporaz7 office modules, subject to provisions in Development Code SecUon 17.10.030-F.4. NOTF~ For definitions see Development Code, Section 17.02.140 C III-14 186 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the review process for certain land uses. The Victoria Community Plan currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent: a. That the review process should be simplified without compromising the quality of the development. b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues. c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough. 2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above- referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-54, recommending that the City Council adopt these amendments. 3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Victoria Community Plan. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more particularly: 187 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 2 1. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 2. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and 3. That this Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environmental impact. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). SECTION 4: The Victoria Community Plan text, Part 3, Section I, Regulations & Standards for Development, Subsection "Commercial Standards," commencing on page 235, is hereby amended to read as attached. SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. General provisions for !and uses designated as Regi:nal Center, Regicna!-rela%ed Cc.'unercial and. Village Commercial. a. Site Development Standards: Ci) Building site coverage: No maximum subject Development Approval Process. (2) Building site width: !50 foot minimum (3) Building height: 65 feet typical maximum; buildings over 65 feet subject to a conditional use permit. b. Uses not permmitted within the Planned Community: Massage Parlors · Adult" M~vie Thca~cE~ "Aaut~" ~o~ks~res- c. Sho1~int Centers. To ensure that the got~s and policies of the G~ners~ ~sa end ~nit7 P~sA an ~plmnted, a ~i~ U~ Pe~t s~ ~ r~~ for shopping enters. ~ su~ a ~ie, c~ fo~2 c~=e~a s~l ~ cousi ~red: (1) The transition Iron more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to titilate cmercial activities such as loading, li2htinB. and truh collection; (2) The center barn been planned as a grow of orSanixed uses and structures I (3) The center is d~siSned with ou~ theme. with buildings end lsndscspinl consistent in design (similar architectur&t style. similar erdariot building uteris~s, md· co~rdin~ted lendseeping thene): (4) The center makes provisions for consistent maintenance. reciprocal access end reciprocal parking; (5) Vehicle end pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulatiou (6) The d~vttopaent or approvsl of say pardion of · canter sh&Lt require t~ ~o~nt of a c~cept~ ~o~ ~t plu w~ s~ cmi~r ~ ~h4ep as, but uo~ l~ted to, cir~ati~, ~fom mr~tect~ ~si~. dr~te/lra~nS, b~fers, p~d ~r~m~ts ~d 189 CC, MM[.~C;AL. STANDA~.DS (ccn:i:,.ued) The following general ca:egories of uses shall be permitted: C!) Retail businesses, including, but no: limited department stores drug scores jewelry stores r d. ?res ~l~t~A:y equi~nent sales clothing stores musical instrument sales shoe stores candy stores photography equipnent sales Sewice businesses, including, but not limited (3) (4) . watch and jewelry repair · beauty parlors · travel agencies · locksmiths. · banks and financial institutions6~ju~/ Aclminist:ative and professional offices Nu=ser~es and 8e=~n supply stotes, pt.~ed that leFtSlier of ~ ~pe sh~l be sold and stote~ in (7) Public Utilit7 offices· (8) Wholesale business offices with s&mples on the prenises. but not to include 8eneral Itora2e. (9) ACCeIIOT~ structures and uses necessity or cultamarily incidental to the above uses as permitted by the Rancho Cucamou2a Zon~n2 Ordinance. (10) Permitted tossunity Facilities listed on PaSs 241. 190 Uses permitted subject '-o ;pecific Use Permit: (2) (3) (4) ~- Ccndi'.isnal Ani~el carc [a~lities. no= i~ludinS kennels. PeTking l~:a and parking buil~inSs' Automobile service stations and car washes. Automobile sales and Service. (5) Elec=ric distribution switch sta:xons. (6) Communication e~uipment bulldines. (7) Public utility booster stations. (8) Ce--er~ial rec,eati~n. (9) Accesso~ s~ruc~ures and uses necessa~ or cus~arily incidental :o :he above uses as s~cifically pr~ided for b7 the use pemi= and =he Zonin~ Ordinance of the Ci:7 of ~ncho Cuc~on~a. (10) Conditionally permitted Community Facilities listed on Page 241. (11) ShoppinS cen~ers subjec~ to pr~isions in Section 1 on PaSe 235. 237 191 JJMM~,~C;AL ST. AN2_.,A~r'jS (:=n",:n=e~) 3. .le~iona! ,ReLated Land ~ses The .folLowing general categories of uses shall ~e permi u:ed: (l) Retail business, including but not limi:ed ::: . depar~en~ st~r~s . furniture stores . automobile sales . ~et s~ores . mo=orcyc!e sales and service . home ~prcvemen= cen=er . hardware stores . grocery . clothing stores . meat markets or delicatessens (2) Service business, including ~ut no= limited · ban s, fi:ancial inst _ tu: ons · ~"tOqVO~i1 C . blueprintin~ ~d photostating . cleanin~ and pressin~ business . laundries . loc~i:hs . mortuaries . mechanical auto wash . pl~ing supply .,o~i.c t.~at~rs ~vei . ~hotographic su~!ies or studios . equi~en= rental · Fh~v m ~ c,i~ (3) Adminlstra=ive and .orofessiona! offices (6) Aut~obile fer=il~er (8) Public utilit7 offices· ~ 10) Sel.~-service facilities. laundry and self-se:-/ice It! cleanS.rE (IX) Accessor./ structures and uses necessary or incidental to :he above uses as permitted by CucamonSa ZoninS Ordinance. customerSly ~he Rancho (12) Permit:ed Community Facilities listed on PaSs 241. Uses permitted subjet: :o a Conditional Use Permit: (1) Animal care facilities. (2) Public utili=7 booster stations. (3) Parking lots and parkin8 buildinBs. (4) Public u:ili%7 exchange and substations. (5) Public buildings. (6) Accelaoz7 strut=urea and uses necessar7 or customaril7 lucidaural to :he above uses as specifically provided the use permit. (7) Condi:iona117 permitted Commumi~ Facilities listed (8) Shoppinl Canters subject to provisions in Sac=ion 1 ou Pale 235. 193 4. VILLAGE COMMERCIAL a. The follc~wing general categories of uses shall be permit:stir <1) Re:all businesses, inc!udins but not limited (3) (4) groceT7 stores meat markets, delicatessens produce markets drug stores dry good stores harc~4are sales pet stores clothing stores florist shops Se~ice businesses, including bu= no= l~i=ed =o: barber shops, beeu:y parlors loc~mirhs la~d~ and d~ ~eanins es=ablishmen:s self-se~ice la~d~ and d~ ~eanin~ A~n~srrarive and Professional offices. Governmanna1 offices. (6) Restaurants (other :~a~ fast food). includ~n2 incidents/ senins of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounSe, ~ar. entertainsent or dancinS. Accessor/ structures and uses necessary or cust~narily incidental to the above as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Ordinance. b. Uses pemitted subject to specific approval of a Couditioul Use Permit: (2) Convenience nZt~ts. (3) Fast feed restaurants. (4) Vine and liquor stores. (5) Restaurants with antertaimaent alcoholic beyeraSes. and/or servins of (6) ShoppinS canters subject to provisions in Section 1 on PaSs 235, (7) Conditionally peraitted ~unit7 Facilities listed on PaSs 241. ORDINANCE NO. 55~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITy PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the review process for certain land uses. The Terra Vista Community Plan currently provides regulations for the use of land. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (developers, business owners, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent: a. That the review process should be simplified without compromising the quality of the development. b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues. c. To maintain a process that. is timely, fair, and thorough. 2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above- referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-55, recommending that the City Council adopt these amendments. 3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Tetra Vista Community Plan. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Ran~ho Cucamonga hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more particularly: 195 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. TVCPA 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page2 1. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; 2. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and 3. That this Community Plan text amendment will have no significant environmental impact. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). SECTION 4: The Terra Vista Community Plan text, Chapter 5, Subsection "Office and Commercial Development Standards," commencing on page V-20, is hereby amended to read as attached. SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 196 /---'F,4 L, 7' _ ,lice and Commercial Development Standards GENERAL TO ALL OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS: Uses Not Permitted Within The Planned Community Massage parlors "Adult" movie theotcrs eH~/~r~i~m~s-/abl,~t 'LAdult" book stoe es (f) The development or approval of any portion of a center shall require the development of a conceptual development plan which shall consider such things as, but not limited to, circulation, uniform architectural design, drainage/grading, buffers, phased improvements and landscaping, Shoppinq Centers To ensure that the goals and policies of the General Plan and Community Plan are implemented, a Conditional Use Permit shall be required for shopping centers. In such a review, the following criteria shall be considered: (a) The transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitigate commercial activities such as loading, lighting, and trash collection; (b) The center has been planned as a group of organized uses and structures; (C) The center is designed with one theme, with buildings and landscaping consistent with design {similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme ); (dl The center makes provisions for consistent maintenance, reciprocal access and reciprocal parking; (e) Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system; and Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "CC" The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Retail businesses, such as but not limited to: Department stores Showroom/catalogue stores Outlet or off-price stores Variety stores Import stores Grocery stores Delicatessens Bakeries and other specialty food Wine and liquor stores (Cd ~) Drug stores Clothing stores Shoe stores Jewelry stores Book stores Record stores Electronics equipment stores R adiol T V I stereo stores Photo equipment stores Furniture stores Wallcoverings stores Lighting stores Pet stores stores REVISED Amendment No. 3, 5 & 6 V - 20 Hardware stores Sporting goods stores Plant stores Toy stores Gift shops Home improvement centers Carpet and flooring stores Paint stores Lighting stores Musical instrument stores Home furnishings and accessories stores Telephone stores Auto parts stores Nurseries and garden supply stores Home appliance stores Plumbing supply stores Service businesses, Ior sales-and-service businessesl, including but not limited to: Travel agencies Beauty parlors and barbers Printers Dry cleaners and laundries Photo and art studios or galleries Locksmiths Interior designers Landscape architects Pool and spa installers Cabinetmakers and other contractors Home security analysts Equipment rental Home appliance repairmen Optometrists preparation service ~Commercial recreation and entertainment, but not limited to: Legal or accounting offices Medical or dental offices Administrative offices Employment agencies Escrow companies Banks and other financial_institutions :~rc~d,:~3 Jr;~,~ - /-~',', .',) Eating 3nd drinkin~ t~t~hlishm~ts_ including Movie theaters Health clubs and spas Music eF, dance ~tudies-, ~'~t~ ~ (~r ~-:~ ,::/(.,,./ ,',, Facilities for the performing arts Automobile businesses limited to the following: Service stations and car washes,~C-UPl"~ Auto parts stores Auto sales and services businesses affiliated with a department store or similar concern I CUPI Community facilities as specified above Hotels and Wholesale businesses~---__ Administrative and professional offices, including but not limited to: Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified above ICUPI Real estate brokers Insurance agent Accessory structure and uses necessary customarily incidental to the above uses or REVISED Amendmen! No, 3, 5 & 6 ~ 1 Other uses which are found by the Plannin9 Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "OP- The following general categories of uses permitted: shall be Administrative offices Professional offices, including but not limited to such professions as: Accounting Law Insurance Architecture Engineering Medicine Dentistry Real estate Financial brokerage Securities brokerage Institutional and governmental uses Retail and service businesses serving the needs of office users, including but not limited to: ~rinters Stationers Secretarial services Commercial recreation facilities compatible with office use, including but not limited to: Banks and other financial institutions.},. -Eating and drinking establishments Automobile service stations ( CUP ) Community facilities as specified above Accessory structures and uses necessary customarily incidental to the above uses or Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification. Uses Permitted in Areas Designated '°RC" The following general categories of uses permitted: shall be Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities. including but not limited to: Health clubs, gyms, spas Racquetball clubs Dance studios Karate or yoga studios Swimming pools Tennis courts Batting cages ~ CUP ) Trampolines { CUP| Miniature golf (CUP) Video arcades {CUPI Bowling alleys Retail and service businesses oriented to active recreation, including but not limited to: Bicycle rental, repair, and sales /t//, REVISED Amendmenl No. 3.5 & 6 V - 22 Skate rental Kite shop Sports equipment rental Sportswear sales Sporting goods store Pro shop Eating and drinking establishments, including but not limited to: Sidewalk cafes Coffee houses Frozen yogurt or ice cream parlors Snack bars or kiosks Specialty retail and service businesses. including but not limited to: Art galleries and studios, indoor or outdoor Crafts and hobby shops Flower shops Health food stores Gift shops Public or private facilities for the performing arts, indoor or outdoor, including but not limited to: Little theater Amphitheater OutdoOr assembly or performing arts area Grocery stores, specialty I CUP ) general, convenience, and/or Community facilities as specified above Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified above ( CUP ) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "NC" The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Retail businesses, including but not limited to: Grocery stores Delicatessens Wine and Drug stores Clothing stores Variety stores Hardware stores Plant stores Gift shops stores Service businesses, including but not limited to: Beauty parlors and barbers Printers Dry cleaners and laundries Travel agencies Locksmiths Administrative and professional offices Restaurants lother than fast foodl, including serving of beer and wine but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment or dancing REVISED Amendmenl No. 3.5" q V ..~ E_a~Lng and drinking establishments Banks and other financial institutions~;~,/,~j~,,~/ Commercial recreation facilities, including but not limited to health clubs and studios (CUPI Automobile service stations Convenience markets {CUP) last'f~d restaurants { CUP -Win~ and I;qu~ sto, e~ (CUP) ' 'ment and/or serving of Community facilities as specified above, including institutional and governmental uses Shopping centers subject to provisions as specified above ( CUP ) Accessory structures and uses necessary or customarily incidental to the above uses Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "MFC" The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Residential uses as permitted in High Density and Medium High Density residential areas Retail businesses REVISED Amendmenl No. 3.5 & 6 V - 24 Restaurants Administrative and professional offices Service businesses Institutional and governmental uses Automobile service stations ~~ Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities Community facilities as specified above Accessory structures and uses necessary customarily incidental to the above or Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "MHO- The following general categories of uses permitted: shall be Residential uses as permitted in High Density and Medium High Density residential areas Hospitals, clinics, and other medical uses Medical offices Other uses accessory or related to the above including but not limited to: Retail businesses Administrative and professional offices Service businesses Restaurants (~;:L~ ,,, f. V-Z', ~ Commercial recreation and entertainment facilities Community facilities as specified above Accessory structures and uses necessary customarily incidental to the above or Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Areas Desiqnated "MOC" The following general categories of uses shall be permitted: Residential uses as permitted in High Density, Medium High Density, and Medium Density residential areas Hospitals, clinics, and medical offices Retail and service businesses Restaurants (~,L(~ ~,*,~ .,,TI/-z/) Hotels Automotive sales and service businesses Automotive service stations and car washes Community facilities as specified above Accessory structures and uses customarily incidental to the above necessary or Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Uses Permitted in Business Park Overlay Zone In addition to the uses permitted by the base zone, the following general categories of uses shall be permitted in the Business Park Overlay Zone: Administrative offices Professional offices, including but not limited to such professions as: Accounting Law Income tax Insurance Architecture Engineering Medicine Optometry Podiatry Chiropractic Osteopathy Dentistry Real estate Escrow Financial brokerage Securities brokerage Interior design Institutional and governmental uses Retail and service businesses serving the need5 of office users, including but not limited to: REVISED Amendment No. 3 g ~, 6 75 Printers Stationers Secretarial services Office supplies and equipment Office machine sales and service Messenger and postal services Commercial recreation facilities compatible with office use, including but not limited to: Health clubs or gyms (CUPI Racquetball courts I CUP) Banks and other financial institutions Eating and drinking establishments Automobile service stations I CUP) Retail studios, stores, and associated workshops for the purpose of sales, office, showroom, and design with workshop for custom-made samples of products for display only in the showroom for the following types of art and craft items: jewelry, picture frames, quilts, ceramics, potteries, and specialty gift items. Custom-made consumer goods within studios, stores, and associated workshops may be allowed, provided that the workshop areas for custom-made consumer goods are ancillary to the studios or stores and do not exceed 35 percent of the leased floor area, and subject to City Planner approval. Retail and service businesses serving the needs of residential users, including but not limited to the following. and subject to the approval of the City Planner: Interior design office with showroom, catering establishments, contractors lexcluding contractors' yards), beauty supply stores, fabric stores, shoe repair shops, antique dealers, security device salesand service, telephone sales, luggage sales, pet grooming and supplies, opticians, medical REVISED Amendmenl No. 3, 5 & 6 V - 26 supply sales and rentals. electrical, electronic, data processing, and telecommunications sales and service. audio/video sa~es and service, furniture sales, apparel shops, and similar businesses. Convenience retail and service businesses such as food and beverage sales, newsstands, bookstores, barber and beauty shops, cleaners, travel bureaus, photo developing, tuxedo rental, bicycle sales and repair, locksmiths, ticket sales, etc. Community facilities ~s specified above Accessory structures and uses necessary customarily incidental to the above uses or Other uses which are found by the Planning Commission to be consistent with the spirit and intent of this land use classification Parking requirements for Business Parks shall be the same as for office parks, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. Site Development Standards for Office and Commercial Uses Building site area, site width, and site depth: No minimum subject to Development Review Process. Building site coverage: No maximum. Building setbacks: As indicated in Table V-5. Parking setbacks: As indicated in Table V-5. Wall setbacks: As indicated in Table V-5. Building height: For areas designated "NC": q0 feet maximum. For other areas: No maximum. Building separation: Building Code. As permitted by the Uniform ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 16, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the review process for subdivisions. The Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga currently provides regulations for the subdividing of land and the review of tentative subdivision maps and tentative parcel maps. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council had available and reviewed a detailed study prepared by a consultant with respect to the development review process. The general summary of the study is that the customers (subdividers, developers, etc.) are concerned with the length of time required to complete the process. This Council hereby finds and declares its intent: a. That the review process should be simplified without compromising the quality of the development. b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the Planning Commission to focus on broader policy issues. c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough. 2. On June 8, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above- referenced amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-56, recommending that the City Council adopt these amendments. 3. On July 20, 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Ran~ho Cucamonga hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and welfare; and more particularly: 204 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 2 1. To implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to guide and manage the future growth of the City in accordance with such plan; 2. To protect the physical, social, and economic stability of residential and other land uses within the City to assure its orderly and beneficial development; 3. To reduce hazards to the public resulting from the inappropriate location, use, or design of buildings, and other improvements; and 4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning. SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). SECTION 4: Section 16.16,170, Subsection B, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced to read as follows: B. City Planner Action. The City Planner may extend the approval of a tentative tract map if he finds that there has been no significant changes in the General Plan Land Use Element, Development Code or other applicable specific/community plan, character of the area within which the map is located, or current planning policy or past practice that would cause the approved map to become inconsistent or non-conforming. If the City Planner finds that there is significant change, the City Planner shall refer the extension request to the Planning Cosmission for consideration. SECTION 5: Section 16.16,170, Subsection D, is hereby deleted n its entirety and replaced to read as follows: De Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the extension of a tentative tract map, after conductin~ a public hearing, the City Planner or Planning Commission may impose new conditions or revise existing conditions on the approved tentative sap as they find necessary. All public hearing notice requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act shall apply. 205 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 3 SECTION 6: Section 16.16,170, Subsection E, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced to read as follows: Ee Appeal of Extension. The subdivider may appeal in writing any action of the City Planner to the Planning Commission, or any action of the Planning Commission to the City Council, within fifteen (15) days of such action in conformance to Section 16.16.130. SECTION 7: read as follows: Section 16.16,170, Subsection G, is hereby amended to Ge ~ ~ The granting of an extension shall require all of the following findings to be made by the approving body: The previously approved tentative map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies; The extension of the tentative map will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current general plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies: The extension of the tentative map is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; The extension is within the time limits prescribed by State law and local ordinance. Unless all of the above findings are made by the ~~g approving body, the requested extension shall be denied. SECTION 8: Section 16.20.100, Subsection B, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced to read as follows: City Engineer Action. The City Engineer may extend the approval of a tentative parcel up if he finds that there has been no significant changes in the General Plan Land Use Element, Development Code or other applicable specific/community plan, character of the area within which the map is located, or current planning policy or past practice that would CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SUBDIVISION'ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 20, 1994 Page 4 cause the approved map to become inconsistent or non-conforming. If the City Engineer finds that there is significant change, the City Engineer shall refer the extension request to the Planning Commission for consideration. SECTION 9: Section 16.20.100, Subsection D, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced to read as follows: Conditions of Approval. As a condition of the extension of a tentative parcel map, after conducting a public hearing, the City Engineer or Planning Commission may impose new conditions or revise existing conditions on the approved tentative parcel map as they find necessary. All public hearing notice requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act shall apply. SECTION 10: Section 16.20.100, Subsection E, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced to read as follows: Appeal of Extension. The subdivider may appeal in writing any action of the City Engineer to the Planning Commission or any action of the Planning Commission to the City Council, within fifteen (15) days of such action in conformance to Section 16.16,130. SECTION 11: The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or work of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptire legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 207 A RESOLUTIC~ OF ~E CITY ~ OF ~E CITY OF RAN~ ~3CAM~r~A, CALI}I~T/A,~ZINGCAI~RANSTOFdRCMASE RIM-WAY FC~ OC~~~ OF A FRRF~Ay TO FRk~R~ ]~T~C~a/qGE~INI~RS~ATE~ANDp~XFTE30 WHEREAS, Caltrans desires to ccr~truct a $140 millic~ Freeway to Freeway Interchange c~ Interstate 15 and Route 30; and M{BREAS, th~ project includes local ~ c~ 1-15 at Subnit ara Cherry Avenues c~ Route 30 and a high oco~ncy vehicle interchange at ~ Avenue; and MM~EAS, the ~ed ~ has been a major circulation ccmpcr~nt to future local traffic plans; and WHEREAS, because the City's approval is n~c~y to proceed in order to acquire r~ce~y right-of-way; and M{EREAS, the schedule of right-of-way acquisition needs to move forward to meet preliminary timeframes; and WHEREAS, th~-~ project is fully funded with a majority of the funds cc~ from the State Interc~anee C=epletion FUnd; and WHEREAS, this project will not foreclose any options fur future Freeway profile designs; and WHEREAS, the City of Fc~tana has entered into an agreement with the State to proceea~__ to acquire right-of-way; NOW, ~{BREKPa, the City Council of the City of Rancho Ow'-n,.~3~ does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: ~he City will enter into a Freeway to Freeway Interchar~je/~/reement which will allow Caltrans to unly proceed with acquisition of M~y right-of-way fur the ~%~sed project; and Section 2: Tb~ R~solution is not intended as an approval of any design feature (i.e., grade, ~XDfile, nur any vertical aligrmmnt, ur service road location ur design) of the proposed Route 30 Freeway preliminary design; Sectic~ 3: ~-~ Resolution will not lock in any specific vertical aligmuent fur Route 30. DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 20, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Councfi Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Linda Daniels, Redevelopmerit Manager SUBJECT: CITY SEAL RECOMMENDATION The Council adopt the colored City Seal design. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Councfi has previously taken action to adopt a City Seal. That black and white artwork has become the basis for an embossed city seal to be used by the City Clerk's office. At the time of adoption, a color version was also requested - for use when appropriate. Life-like colors were used to enhance the blend of contemporary and traditional subjects included in the drawing. The original art work will be available at the meeting; its colors are a little less vivid than the copy attached). This version of the seal further adds to Rancho Cucamonga's reputation as an innovator in the graphic design field. Respectfully submitted, Llnda D. Danlels Redevelopment Manager LDD/LS/LS Attachment · · mmm III III .e, II1= DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 20,1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON TEEN PROGRAMS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTRODUCTION During the City Council meeting held on July 5, 1994, City Council directed staff to provide an informational report on teen programs and activities within the City. BACKGROUND The City, School Districts, and Youth Sport Groups have been working with teens within the community to develop programs and activities that would interest, challenge, and provide alternatives for them. A Teen Recreation Activity Club known as TRAC was created and sponsored by the City in 1989 to help teens handle the many challenges they face. TRAC is made up of Junior High and High School Students in Rancho Cucamonga who are interested in getting involved in their community. The teens are involved in decisions regarding what recreational activities they want. With input from the members, TRAC has provided a wide variety of activities including: Club 90 Dance Club, Summer Teen Camp, Camping in San Diego, Camping in Catalina, Summer Beach Trips, Monthly Baby Sitting Program, Ski Trips, Trips to Amusement Parks, Pizza Parties and Socials, Bowling Tournaments, Volleyball, and Teen Sport Challenge. Additionally, TRAC members volunteer thousands of community service hours at special events each year, which teaches them job skills. TRAC members raise funds for many types of recreational activities. They operate snack bars throughout the year at programs and special events and run a babysitting program. The earned monies are used by TRAC for teen programs and special excursions. TRAC meets at the Lion Community Center to plan upcoming activities. TRAC meetings are open to all teens. The Park and Recreation Commission will be discussing teen activities within the City at their July 17,1994 commission meeting. R s . ~i~ ~Manager 211 i~iI]Ek*tATIOB.i '111 ~llmllH ..... I .... 1"'1 TTln]lml[" "~ "