Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994/07/06 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. July 6, 1994 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Califi~rnia 91730 City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tern Willinrn J. Alexander, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane Willlares, Counciimember Jack Lsm, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda July 6, 1994 PAGE All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: Bucluet A. CALl TO ORDER , Alexander , Stout Williams . and Gutierrez B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSFNT CAI FNDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: May 26, 1994 (Gutierrez absent) June 8, 1994 June 9, 1994 Approval of Warrants. Register Nos. 6/8/94.6/15/94 and 6/22/94. and Payroll ending 6/2/94, for the total amount of $2,700,1,50.15. Alcoholic Beverage Application for '21" Off-Sale General for Ramona Market, Deeb I. Deeb, 9950 West Foothill Boulevard, Units A and B. 14 City Council Agenda July 6, 1994 Alcoholic Beverage Application for '41 · On Sale Beer & Wine (Public Eating Place) for Rocky's N.Y. Pizzeria, Luis and Maria G. Orihuela, 9615 Foothill Boulevard. 5. Approval to extend Corncast Cable T.V. Franchise. RESOLUTION NO. 91-0 12Q a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Approval to adopt Compensation Resolution for Fiscal Year 1994/95 RESOLUTION NO. 94-132 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-142 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 Approval to amend Resolution No. 93-062 providing for charges for parking at the Rancho Cucamonga Sports Complex. RESOLUTION NO. 94-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-062 AND ESTABLISHING A NEW PARKING FEE SCHEDULE FOR PARKING AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPORTS COMPLEX DURING EVENTS FOR WHICH ADMISSION IS CHARGED Approval to accept the County Library Site from the County of San Bemardino, located at 9191 Base Line Road - APN: 208-011-58. RESOLUTION NO. 94-134 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE LIBRARY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9191 BASE LINE ROAD, APN 208-011-58, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN SAID DEED PAGE 2 16 18 19 2O 21 37 38 41 42 City Council Agenda July 6, 1994 PAGE 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. ApDroval to maintain levy for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 at current levels with no increase. RESOLUTION NO. 94-135 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABUSHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) Approval to Reject all Bids for the Traffic Signal and Safety Ughting at the Intersection of Archibald Avenue and Eighth Street Project. Approval to execute Cooperative Agreement (CO 94-048), State Agreement No. 8-786, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the design and construction of Traffic Control Signals, Safety Ughring and Roadwork on Route 66 at Baker Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 94-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT. STATE AGREEMENT NO. 8-786, FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS, SAFETY LIGHTING AND ROADWORK ON ROUTE 66 AT BAKER STREET Approval to execute Flood Control District, Zone 1, Common Use Agreement No. FA 19006 (CO 94-049] for crossings of San Sevaine Creek at Summit Avenue, Henderson Channel at San Sevaine Road and Wardman Channel at Colonberg Road. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement (CO 94- 050) to conduct an update appraisal of Assessment District 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Security for Conditional Use Permit 94-11, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and the A.T. & S.F. Railroad Spur Track west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by BHP Steel USA. Incorporated. 44 46 51 52 53 54 56 57 City Council Agenda July 6, 1994 PAGE 4 16. 17. 18. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 94-137 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-11 Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 14121, located at the southwest corner of Milliken and Highland Avenues, submitted by K. Hovnanian Companies of Southern California II, Inc. and release previously submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Cash Monumentation Deposit accepted by City Council on February 20, 1991, from Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 94-138 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 14121 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 20, 1991 Approval to release Improvement Agreement and Bonds, Resolution No. 89-452, accepted from the Caryn Company for Wardman Bullock Road (A.K.A. Lower Loop Road) for Tract 13566- 1 and -3, generally located south of 24th Street and west of Cherry Avenue. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14407. located on the south west corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Ddve, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 94-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14407 Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Elm Avenue Improvements, located on Elm Avenue West between Church Street and Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Homes. 58 6O 62 64 66 68 69 City Council Agenda July 6, 1994 PAGE 5 r'<ESOLUTION NO. 94,- 140 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ELM AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS 71 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - Review of a Development Agreement for the Redevelopment of 380 acres of land, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink] Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01,1:]4, 07, and 08; 210-081- 22 and 23; 210082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. ORDINANCE NO. 526 (first reading] AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 94-01, FOR SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE. FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01.134. 07, AND 138; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02. 11.17.37.38 AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26 72 82 City Council Agenda July 6, 1994 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PlAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN RAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25- acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east, and the related text and graphic changes - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. ORDINANCE NO. 527 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CrTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94- 01, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ONT HE WEST, CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM AVENUE ON THE EAST AND AMENDING VARIOUS TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63 PAGE 162 182 G. PUBLIC HFARINGS The following items have no legal requirements. The Chair will open public testimony. publication or posting the meeting to receive No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAnFR'S STAFF RFPORTS The following Items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. STATUS REPORT/UPDATE ON ROUTE 30 FREEWAY (ORAL REPORT) APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION REQUESTING MANDATE RELIEF FROM EXISTING AND NEW PROGRAMS ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE LEGISI ATURE AND CONGRESS 201 City Council Agenda July 6, 1994 PAGE 7 RESOLUTION NO. 94,- 141 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. URGING THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE MANDATE RELIEF FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 202 I. COUNCIl BUSINFSS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT PI AN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ONTARIO AIRPORT TERMINAL RESOLUTION NO. 94-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, URGING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS TO EXPEDITE THE EXPANSION OF THE PLANNED PASSENGER TERMINAL FACILITIES OF THE ONTARIO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 204 CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT A BELOW GRADE DESIGNED FREEWAY FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY CORRIDOR THROUGH RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 94-143 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAUFORNIA, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT FOR A BELOW GRADE DESIGNED FREEWAY FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY CORRIDOR THROUGH RANCHO CUCAMONGA DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO PREVENT CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES 205 206 City Council Agenda July 6, 1994 J. IDFNTIFICATION OF ITFMS FOR NFXT MFFTIN~I- This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. PAGE 8 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBIIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS: (1) LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE ROBERT DOMINGUEZ, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS WITH ALL CITY EMPLOYEE GROUPS. (2) PROPERTY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE 1-15 FREEWAY AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WITH HUGHES PURCELL/HOME DEPOT; JAMES MARKMAN AND LINDA DANIELS NEGOTIATORS; CONCERNING NEGOTIATION OF PROPERTY ACQUISITION/DEVELOPMENT (3) PROPERTY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ROCHESTER, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL, WITH VALLEY BASEBALL; JAMES MARKMAN AND LINDA DANIELS NEGOTIATORS; CONCERNING PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 29, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. May 26, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINU'I~S Adjourned Meeting /~ adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, May 26, 1994, in the Trl Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. by Mayor Stout. Present were Members: William j. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Dlane Willlams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager;, Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Bob Domlnguez, Administrative Services Director. Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Accountant; Bob Valenti, Accountant; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe O'Nefi, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Bob Zetterberg; Integrated Waste Coordinator;Brad Buller, City Planner; Wfiliam Makshanoff; Building Official; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager, Kathy Sorensen; Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Marti Hlggins, Disaster Preparedness Manager; Captain Bruce Zeiner, Police Department; Lt. Joe Henry, Police Department; Chief L. Dennis Michael, Fire Protection District; Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer; Bob Corcoran; Deputy Chief; Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mlckey, Management Analyst I; Jim Frost, City Treasurer, and Debra J. Adams. City Clerk. Absent was Member. Rex Gutierrez B, ITEM OF DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGEIS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 Jack Lava, City Manager, gave presentation on all City budgets to the Councfi. Councilmember Alexander asked what the potential arbitration amount might be for the Fire District. Bob Dornmguez, Adrnlnlstrative Services Director, stated about $250,000. Councilmember Alexander asked if the .5% from the possible reduction of utility tax money would cover the $250,000. jack tam, City Manager, stated yes and that the City would know something on that this week. Councilmember Alexander asked if any of the state's take-away programs have put money back into the City's pocket. Council/Agency/Fire District Minutes May 26, 1994 Page 2 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated none that he knew of. Mayor Stout stated he felt if the City was setting up contingencies for what the state might take away, they will take it away. He did not think it was wise to do that. Councilmember Buquet stated he did not think the state would have a balanced budget until next year. He did not think the City should believe that the state will not take anything away from the cities. He felt the City should stay prepared for state take-aways that might come down to us. Councilmember Alexander asked if asset seizure money could be used for the DARE program. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it cannot be used for a continuing progrnm. Mayor Stout did not feel it should be used for these types of programs. Councilmember WillJams stated she felt the City should be concerned about the reallocation of sales tax money. Councilmember Buquet felt the $450.000 for NPDES was a consen-ative amount. He stated he did not think any decisions could be made at this time because there was stfil other matters to be considered, i.e., right sizing, etc. Councilmember Alexander felt he would like to keep looking at some form of reduction of the utfiity two He asked if there was any program to get money back for negligent fires. He felt the City should go after getting reimbursed for the cost of some of these. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like to get information on the City's subrogation activities. Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director, stated he could do that. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like to look into Code Enforcement possibly falling under another department's Jurisdiction rather than Planning. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PIJBLIC No communication was made from the public. D, ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by WillJams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 4- 0-1 (Gutierrez absent). The meeting adJoumed at 6:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted. Debra j. Adams. CMC City Clerk Approved; June 8, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Ac~ourned Meeting An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Councfi was held on Wednesday, June 8, 1994, at the Alta Loma High School Auditorium, located at 8880 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane WillJams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lain, City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; jim Frost City Treasurer; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION Mayor Stout stated this is one of a series of continuing meetings regarding the Route 30 Freeway. He stated there would be a presentation from the City and SANBAG. 1. C1TY'S REQUEST FOR CALTRANS AND SANBAG PRESENTATION OF ROUTE 30 PLANNING PROGRAM Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated this project is in the preliminary design states at the present time. He thanked Caltrans and SANBAG for participating in this meeting and turned the meeting over to Gary Moon with SANBAG. Gary Moon stated he had a handout for everyone which he hoped would answer some of their questions. He stated there were comment cards if anyone wanted to fill one out to get a question answered if it didn't get answered tonight. He explained how all the governmental agencies work together for this type of project. He presented slides of the proposed project. The following residents addressed Mr. Moon with questions or made comments about the proposed freeway: Gayle Hinazumi Sergio Martinez William Canon Joel Ferris Laura Malanda Bob Collier Thomas Spencer Koran Muhamud Ernie Mansfield Roy Hartley Mitch Moshay Linda Lafman Phil Micotchka City Council Minutes June 8, 1994 Page 2 Mayor Stout stated this the first of many City Council meetings to discuss this matter and that the Councfi now needs the opportunity to digest the information. Frank Munos, CCAR Political Action Committee, thanked Mr. Moon for his time and felt the people need leadership from the City. He urged Councfimembers Wfiliams and Buquet to help the residents, and thanked Mayor Stout and Councfimembers Alexander and Gutierrez for their time and showing their concern. Councilmember Willjams felt the freeway belonged to the people and it should be done how they want it. Councilmember Buquet stated this is in the preliminary stages and that the plan needs more work. He felt it should be a quality project. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Wllliams, seconded by Alexander to adjourn the meetlng. Motion carried unammously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: June 9, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A. OAT.T. TO ORD~.R A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council was held on Thursday, June 9, 1994, in the Tri Communities Conference Room, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:37 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Members: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Susan Stark, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Accountant; Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Dave Blevins, Public Works Maintenance Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Marti Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Chief Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Lt. Joe Henry, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief L. Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II, Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Jack Lam, City Manager, requested an executive session regarding the meet and confer process. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to add the executive session to the agenda at the conclusion of the regular agenda. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. * , , , , ITeM OF DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 Jack Lam, City Manager, referred to his memorandum dated May 4 regarding "Transmittal of Preliminary Budgets, and stated staff needed direction on the policy issues listed on the last page. Council/Redevelopment Agency/Fire District Minutes June 9, 1994 Page 2 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve items 1 - 4. Motion carried unanimously.'5-0. Jack Lam, City Manager, explained what Item 5 entailed. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he did not want to spend the money to do this. Councilmember Alexander stated he didn't think the City had any choice. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated cities have expressed their concerns to their legislaeors and the League of California Cities. ACTION: The Council decided they needed more information on this before they make a decision. Jack Lam, City Manager, explained Item 6. Mayor Stout felt the City should go forward with animal control, because he was not happy with what the County was providing. He felt the money could be found to go forward with this program. Councilmember Williams felt there should be some creative way this could be done and stated she agreed with Mayor Stout. Mayor Stout stated he would not be in favor of contracting this with another humane society or some organization like that. He also did not think it should be opened at optimum staffing levels. Jack Lam, City Manager stated Ontario has expressed interest in our animal shelter. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, stated Fontana has expressed interest also. Councilmember Buquet expressed his concerns with starting this up. He felt the City should proceed cautiously because of liability problems that might occur. He did feel something should be done with this facility instead of leaving it vacant. Councilmember Alexander felt it should possibly go to the voters to see how they felt about paying for this. He asked if the City would have time to add the measure to meet County deadlines. Councilmember Buquet suggested that this be done through a survey through the Grapevine instead of the City having to pay for an election. Item 7 - Mayor Stout stated he was in favor of this. The entire City Council concurred. Jack Lam, City Manager, explained Item 8 commenting on the state's situation and how it will affect local agencies. He added he did not think the State would do much of anything until after November or possibly even next year. Council/Redevelopment Agency/Fire District Minutes June 9, 1994 Page 3 Councilmember Gutierrez asked about dropping the utility tax rate. Councilmember Buquet felt the City should stay where it is now and not make any commitments to drop the utility tax at this time. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the City has had a full year of collecting utility tax monies yet. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated no. Councilmember Buquet felt the City should hold onto the utility tax money for now because of not knowing the state's position at this time. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he is proud that the budget is balanced and the situation the City is in at the present time. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about waiting to start the NPDES. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the video taping has already been done. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the booking fee lawsuit is settled, but that the fees were going up in cost for the future. Councilmember Buquet suggested staff bring back options and other information where mentioned above. ~- - ~.OBaMUNT~ATIONS FROM TH~ PUmr. IC C1. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, commented on the Ada Cooper Trust and also that he felt Mr. Lunde, who had just left, was going to eventually hit the Council up for money for the Route 66 Visitor's Bureau. , , · , , n. ~nJOURNlw~.NT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to an executive session relative to the meet and confer process for all employee groups, not to reconvene. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: CZlY OF RANCHO CUCA eA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIODS 06-08-94 (93/94) RUN DATEs 06/09/94 PAtes 1 VENOOR NAME ZTEN DESCRIPTION HARM NO HARK. ANT. ee CHECK8 OVERLAP 2071 STARK, SUSAN N, LGUE OF CXTXES FINANCE SENXNAR 868778 ZSOoOO 1081 8OLIN NAZNTo L JANITORXAL, JOHN JANXTORXAL SERVICES I 868788 14,923o00 ((( 86879 - 86889 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES 868908 2SoOO i135 ALIGNRENT ~ BRAKE SPECIALISTS 2644 ALPERT°S PRINTING 264 ALPHA 8ETA 1430 ANERICAN BUSINESS FORHS 24 ARSON NURSERY INCe 2437 ASSOCIATED PLANTSCAPERS, ZNC, 6282 BAKER, HELZSSA 33 eASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDMARE 47 6ELL g HONELL 6269 6FCS LXNXTEO 6285 8XSHOP, ANOREA 6286 8RANKSHAm GARY 3942 CAL NESTERR TERMITE PEST CONTROL 6066 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 3305 CARDE PACXFXC CORPORATION 461 CARE ANERXCA HEALTH PLAN ~287 CASTILLO, OZiNE 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 6288 CENTURY 21RANCHO 69 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL 6284 CHARLES M. 8AVER, TRUST 713 CHXCK'S SPORTING GOODS INC 73 CITRUS ROTORS ONTARXOm INC. 2362 CON $ER COMPANY, INC. 2692 CORPUSERVE, INCORPORATED 6289 CRITICAL POUER SYSTEMS 85 CUCANONGA CO MATER OXST 60 OELTA OENTAL PLAN OF CALXF 6290 OENNXS, BRIAR lOT OETCO 3484 OOC JOE'S 629X OURAN, ROBERT N. 523 EASTNAN, XNC 459 EGGHEAD SOFTMARE 3707 ESGXL CORPORATION 123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 629Z FELOER, LXNOA 124 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND, INC. 125 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS, CO. 4024 FLEMING CONSTRUCTZONe 4215 FOUR STAR LXGNTING XNC. 3947 FOURTH STREET ROCK 6293 FRESHIE DONUTS 3356 GARCXAe VIVZAN I&jl8 GOLOEN BEAR ARBORISTS, XNC. ((( 86898 VEHXCLE MAINTENANCE 86899 OFFXCE SUPPLXES 86900 RECREATION SUPPLXES 86101 OFFICE SUPPLXES t 86902 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 86903 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE 86904 RECREATION REFUND 86905 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 86906 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE I 86907 REFUND OVERPHT FILM/LICENSE 86908 RECREATION REFUND 86909 REFUNO fiXNOR EXCEPTION PERMIT 869X0 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVXCE I 86911 PROFESSXONAL SERVXCE$ 869X2 NAINTENANCE/VEHZCLE SUPPLIES 869X3 MEDICAL PREMIUM 86914 RECREATION REFUND 86915 NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 86916 8USXNESS LICENSE REFUND 86917 REIMBURSE FOR EQUIP. PURCHASE 86918 ROCHESTER/LARK OR RXGHT-OF-NAV · 86919 RECREATION SUPPLIES 86920 VEHICLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLiES 86921 SERVICE/REPAIRS 86922 HONTHLY SERVICE 86923 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 86924 ((( 86925 - 86928 HONTHLY MATER BILLINGS I 86929 DENTAL INSURANCE 86930 RECREATION REFUND 86931 OFFICE SUPPLIES 86932 RAXNTENANCE REPAIRS 86933 DEPOSIT REFUNO 86934 OFFICE SUPPLIES · 86935 OFFXCE SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT 86936 PLAN CHECK 86937 DELIVERY SERVICE t 86938 RECREATXON REFUND 86939 HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 86940 PROPERTY PROFILE 86941 NEXGHBQORNOOO CENTER IMPROVNNT I 86942 OFFXCE SUPPLXE$ 86943 NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 86944 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 8694S C.EeR.T. CLASS SUPPLIES 86946 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 86947 8689t - 116000 20o87 28.11 1,104.93 936035 1,454.50 10o00 169036 289.22 119.50 30,00 IToO0 696o65 40,00 192.86 23,468°40 16.00 2e058,88 240.00 500.00 31e913062 68.61 126,27 195.00 33.90 30.71 11,956.48 21,195.I1 30.00 8008 65.85 5OO.OO 566084 692.84 3,105.88 104,75 35.00 204090 25.00 3,640,55 S5oSO 43Z,62 Z2.4Z 50.00 9,939o00 CITY OF RANCHQ CUCARONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-08-96 (93/943 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmm RUN OATEl 06/09/96 ..0. o..,.,o. m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm WARRe A~To 650 GRAINGERm W.W. 4194 OREO'S ELECTRICAL $UPPLXESm XNC, 6ZOi GRIPPITH, NANCY Z)7 GTE CALIFORNIA &i96 HANSON OFFICE PROOUCTS IZSGi HARTEYe OERRICK Z069 HEYDEe DONALD Le 6150 HOLIDAY PRINTING I2580 HONNOLOt CHRZS I234 HOSEMAN 163 HOYT LUMBER CORe SeRe 4254 IBM CORPORATION 1121 ZNDEPENOENT ELECTRONICS 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 165 ZNGRAM PAPER 3185 INLAND LAWNMOWER 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 4X62 INTERNATIONAL IMAGES t25R) J.G. COLLECTABLER XZSBZ JAGUSCN, DOROTHY 1829 JWP TELECOM INC. 203 KIPLINGER HASHINGTON LETTER 12586 KLEAR FLOWER DZSTo XZZ8 KNOX lZSB5 KONZNG CONSTRUCTION CO,m STEVE 4005 KRUZE C KRUZE CONSTRUCTION t ENG. I2581 LA ROCQUE BETTER ROOFS i2586 LXEBNAN REXHER g MCNEXL I2568 LIMe BRXAN 43Z LOCAL GOVERNPENT COMMISSION 1ASS LOWO'S DRUGS 600 LVNCNm JANXE 6283 MARCELLA BAYERe TRUST 7Z HARK CHRXSm XNCe 76 MARKMANmARCZVNSKXmHANSQN,L KING Z973 NC CONNELL, RYAN 12569 fieHAS CONSTRUCTXON XNC. 602 NEYERm PAT 749 NIJAC ALARM COMPANY 403 MORTON COATXNGSt XNC, - BAUER 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS S93 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE 67 ON-CALL COMMUNICATIONS 2640 ON-CALL CQMNUNZCATZQNS &223 PAPER DIRECT 3671 PERDUE t ASSOCXATESe LEN 8612 PETCO ANIHAL SUPPLIES 1134 2987 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS S42 PIP PRINTING ~60 PZZZA '~L MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS OFFICE SUPPLIES DEPOSIT REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PRXNTXNG OF THE GRAPEVINE RECREATION REFUND HAZNTENANCE SUFPLXES MAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES AOHXN[STRATZON CLASS MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES VEHICLE NAXNTENANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS HONTNLY RENTAL FEE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATXON REFUND TELEPHONE SERVICES RENEWAL FOR lZ MONTHS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTEhANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND PROGRESS ESTIMATE 8X OVERPAYMENT ON PERHXTS BUSXNESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATEON REFUNO REGXSTRATXON FILM PROCESSXNG RECREATION SUPPLXES ROCHESTER/LARK DR RIGHT-OF-WAy VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSXONAL SERVXCES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES ALARH SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE NNA MEPBERSHZP DUES UNIFORM SERVICES MONTHLY SERVICES NONTHLV SERVICES RECREATXON SUPPLIES APPRAISAL FEE RECREATION TRIP MONTHLY SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND~ C. HECKI OVERLAP 86948 161.75 86949 SioOT 86950 39.50 I 1695Z 956.47 86952 874.50 86953 SOOeOO I 86955 12,216.71 86956 3SeO0 86957 7°95 86958 1.02 86959 86960 65.50 · 8696z 420e24 I 86962 183.42 8 86963 40.48 · 86964 143o36 86965 ~80oT4 86966 ii.SO 86967 26.00 t 86968 880.T2 86969 68.00 86970 19.00 · 8697i 55.24 86972 ZO.O0 8 86973 1T2,650.24 86974 83.80 86975 66.00 86976 86977 SO0.O0 86978 3.8S 86979 33.60 I 86980 31e913e62 86981 135,49 I 8698Z 6m934eOO 86983 36.12 86984 17,40 86985 100o00 a 86986 84.00 ~ 86987 1,635.1t 86988 39.t7 86989 m 869~0 431041 · 86991 108,34 I 86992 m 86993 596.25 86994 1 mOO0.O0 86995 10.~7 86996 391.55 86997 e699B Is.to CiTY OF RANCHO CU( ;A LiST OF WARRANt. FOR PERIOD: 06-08-94 (93/943 RUN DATE: 06109/94 PAGE: 3 · :;;; :-:;:;---------------------------------;;;-;;;;;;;;::.....................:;:: .;:........................................ MARRe ANT. 791 PNZ/OELTA CARE 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 228 RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY 8614 RANCNO ENGINE NACHiNE 8615 REVENUES AT RiSK SEMINAR 8616 METES, ESTER gZ95 RILEY'S FARM L ORCHARD 276 RXVERSXDE BLUEPRINT 2084 SAFECO LIFE INS. CO. GROUP AONXNo 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY 8ROOM COt iNC 3041 SANCHEZ, ALEX 8617 SAUL, MARY S35 SEMPLE. JUDY 4253 $HALZMAR TOURS & CHARTER 317 SO CALZF EDISON 319 SO CALZF GAS CO. 143Z 1432 397 8618 646 646 1431 1431 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS SOUTHNEST TRAiNiNG CONSULTANTS STANDARD INSURANCE STANDARD INSURANCE COs SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION 4246 SURF SAVING INTERNATIONAL 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 8619 TROP C.P.A.. NILLiAR Re 3618 TROXELL COMMUNICATIONS 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 489 UPLANDs CITY OF 8620 VARDER STUDIOS. XNC. 8621 VXDAL. MARIA 3422 VIKING OFF/CE PRODUCTS 499 ViSiON SERVICE PLAN - (CA) 213 NAXiEt KLEEN-LZNE CORP 4116 NESTERN POaER SYSTEMS 267 MESTERN ROCK CO 1941 NESTERN TURF & COHMERCZAL 8622 MOLFE, MARIE 94 NOLFINBARGER INCee 675 NYNN°S FROSTEMP/NAXAZR 509 XEROX CORPORATION 371 ZEE'NEOZCAL SERVICE 2732 ARC LOCK 3785 ACTION ART 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR NEOXCAL INSURANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REIMBURSE GRANT FUNDS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS REVENUES AT RISK SENXNAR RECREAIZON REFUNDS RECREAIXON TICKETS PRINTS MEDICAL iNSURANCE MAZNT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUNDS iNSTRUCTOR PAYNENT RECREATION TRiP NONTHLT ELECTR[C BiLLiNGS MONTHLY GAS BILLS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS MONTHLY ELECTRZC 8iLLS MONTHLY COMPUTER CONTRACT 8US[NESS LICENSE REFUNDS XNSURANCE PREMIUM iNSURANCE PREMIUM MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES NA[NTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES NAZNT SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS SECURITY VZOEO MONITOR UMP SERVICES MONTHLY MATER BILLING BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS RECREAIXN REFUNDS OFFICE SUPPLIES MONTHLY VISION SERVICE BiLLiNG MAiNT SUPPLIES COMPUTER UPGRADE ASPHAL1 L CONCRETE MAiNT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES VEHICLE NAZNT $UPPLZE$ COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES '((( 81056 NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREAIION SUPPLIES CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS e$ CHECKI OVERLAP 86999 751.86 8 87000 131.59 87001 2Z8.16 87002 17.62 87003 xS.0o 87004 35.00 87005 192.00 87006 14.07 87007 10.34 67008 133.61 87009 432.00 87010 16.00 87011 261.00 87012 241.20 I 87013 67,440.08 87014 169o20 81015- e/Die >>> 8 87029 54,613.32 8~030 14e 182.92 87031 575.00 87032 15.57 87033 583.20 87034 303.90 87035 139.30 87036 2,316.00 87037 232.00 8 87038 5.109.14 87039 8.25 8~040 154.20 I 87041 2e410.00 810,.2 111.04 87043 272.25 67044 35.00 I 87045 58.35 87046 60,097.02 I 87047 133.66 I 87048 57.941-00 I 87049 568.61 87050 65.82 I 8705t 17.00 87052 61.96 81053 23.41 87054 919.29 87055 115.99 87057 ))) 87058 1,275.13 87059 543.06 87060 118.51 TOTAL 594.642.09 CITY OF RANCHQ CUCJ A LIST OF MARRAN1. FOR PERIOD: 06-15-94 (93/94) RUN DATE: 06/I5/96 PAGE: VENDOR NAME iTEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. ART. I2572 8-F.CoS. LTD. 1606 STEZNt 8QN CNEMQRZES OF ELVZS) 69 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL 666 STANDARD INSURANCE 454 S C C C A 3606 ECDFF, JiLL 6302 CRUZ, BJ 390Z 3-0 CARPET L DRAPERY 4272 77 CAPITAL CORPORATION 10 A g R TiRE SERVICE 21X A P Z ALARH SYSTEMS 6296 AAHCO TRANSMiSSiONS 6297 ADDED COMHUNICATXONS OF CALIFORNIA 2838 ADIRONDACK DIRECT 6298 AOVANCED AIR SYSTEHS 6295 AES 3529 ALAR GLASS 6097 ALPERT, ABE 3778 ALPERT, HELANZE 266 ALPHA BETA 973 ALPHAGRAPHiCS XD)O AHERZCAN BUSINESS FORHS 2233 AHERZCAN HEART ASSOCiATiON 2693 AMTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR COo 2411 ARAGON, SALLY 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 602 AUTO RESTORATORS 1061 AVARDS BY CHAHPZQN 12572 8-F.C.S. LTO, 4229 8ACiCH, PATRICK 841 DANK OF AMERiCA-CORPORATE 6153 OARCLAYS LAN PUBLISHERS 6299 8ARNA INTERIORS, HARZE 33 BASELiNE TRUE VALUE HARDNARE 2663 BEE REMOVERS SSS BENEPIELD, KINGSLEY 1338 BIG A AUTO PARTS 1478 BNi BUILDING HENS 162 BRADFORDo HAROLD 3193 8RUNICK, ALVAREZ & BATTERSBY 4154 DRUNNER, ED 1166 BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES 552 BURK-DLACKSCHLEGER, ROSEANN 6300 C.8.A. PRODUCTIONS F4~23 CALZFORkZA SENSOR CORPORATION RECREATION REFUND DEPOSIT REIHBURSEHENT RENTAL - AUOZTORZUH AeLoHoSe iNSURANCE PREHZUM MEETING PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT RETIREMENT DINNER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ALARM SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE RENEbAL BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION EQUIPMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND SUBSCRIPTION VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CPR BOOKS MONTHLY SERVICE iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE ENGRAVED PLAQUE RECREATION REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION FEES CCR TITLE 19 COMPLETE AHEND$ BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICE iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUBSCRIPTION iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BOOKING FEES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PMT ADVERTISING OFFiCE/MAiNTENANCE EQUIPMENT ** CHECKt OVERLAP 864544, 38505,.98- 86455- 8673I 867325 100000- 86733- 86890 868910 152.40 86892- 87033 87036, 303090- 87035- 87060 · 870618 350000 · 870624, 506.81 870634, )O.O0 87064- 87067 87068 331075 87069 152.56 87070- 87070 · 87071 20410072 87072 84.00 87073 110089 87074 I4Z.OO 87075 20604023 87076 7.00 87077 S64.39 87078 76.18 87079 120.00 87 080 324000 87081 69066 87062 53.91 87083 702.26 87 084 256.64 · 87085 524066 87086 568.80 87087 90590.50 87088 3,77Z035 870U9 62.50 87090 3,505.98 87091 100.00 87092 509.31 87093 lO2.OO 17094 17.76 R 87095 33.10 i 87096 225000 87097 158.60 87098 180,82 67099 94.95 87100 91.08 8 87101 392.97 87102 288.00 87103 292.05 87104 2e779086 87105 169.00 ITIO6 56.35 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LiST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIODS 06-15-~4 C93/94) RUN DATES 06/15/94 PAGES VENOOR NAME mmmmmmmmNmmmmmmmmmmmemmmmmmmmmmmemmmmmmmmmmmmmmeammmmmmmmmmamm ITEM DESCRIPTION WARN NO WARN. ANT. $$ CHECKt OVERLAP 6301 CANACHO, SALVADOR PLAN CHECK REVIEW FEE REFUND 87107 90.00 2382 CASK N CLEAVER EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH CELT. 87108 XBO.O0 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES S 87109 1,124.38 3622 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY LUNCHEON/ZNSTAL DINNER 87Zi0 84.00 3622 CHAMBER OF CONfiERCE MONTHLY LUNCHEON/ZNSTAL DINNER I 87111 195.00 488 CHEVRON U S At INC GASOLINE CHARGES 8TiSZ 93.&0 73 CITRUS NOTORS ONTARIO, INC. VEHICLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLIES I 87i13 377.95 949 CLARK, KAREN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87114 64,4e 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 17115 78,72 4ZI9 COMPETITIVE EDGE CYCLERY EQUXPMENT REPAIR e 87116 103.28 2692 CONPUSERVE, ZNCORPORATEO MONTHLY SERVICE 87i17 10.00 20St COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO,, INC. NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/REPAZRS # 871i6 1,972.80 2894 COUNTY TREASURER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT 87119 302.31 3331 CUNERTY, ANNA iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87120 257.40 4263 CUSTOM PLASTICS SUPPLIES g SERVICE 8TlZi 1,340,00 284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COt INC OFFICE SUPPLIES I 87122 92.12 355 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE L SUPPLIES · 87123 358.66 241B DAPPER TIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 87IZ4 lT4.5I 129i DATAVAULT - UeS. ~AFE DEPOSIT CO. DATA STORAGE 87125 I/leSO 3909 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION STRONG NOTION FEE 87126 4,876.32 4231 DESIGN A SZGN OFFICE SUPPLIES J 87127 303oS0 tO7 OETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES I 6TI28 12i,T6 523 EASTMAN, XNC OFFICE SUPPLIES S 87i29 785.54 2298 EDUCATIONAL AV OF CALiFORNiA CPR SUFPLZES g 87i30 464.90 2498 enP AMERICA CPR SUPPLIES 67131 S56.95 3236 ETZWANDA HIGH SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL SERVZCES 87132 150.00 123 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP DELIVERY SERVZCE 87133 IS.SO 6303 FIRES, HORTENCIA RECREATION REFUND I 87134 91.50 2909 FILTER RECVCLZNG SERVICE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES 87135 165.00 130 FOOTHILL LAWNHOMER SERVICE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT 87136 332,34 2140 FORD OF UPLAND, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 87X37 3.It : 6305 GoO. V.CeB. INSTALLATION OZNNER 87138 20.00 3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES S 87139 17t369.00 6304 GQREZe JUDY RECREATION REFUNO 87i40 39eSO 49Z GRAVES AUTONOTXVE SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 8714I 198o62 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS I 87142 755.75 4196 HANSON OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 87143 409,99 4270 HARTZELLe REGINA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87144 96cOO 2855 HAVEN NINE & LIQUOR CO. SUB-COHHZTTEE MEETINGS · 87145 60.72 3334 HEZLZG, KELLY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BTt46 785.70 16t HOVT LUMBER CORe SeND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87147 337.96 Z4XZ HOYT, RAYHOMO INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87148 20602086 3436 HUNT, LUANNE INSTRUCTOR PNT 87149 iZ.8S 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, XNC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87Z30 258.40 167 [ C 8 0 - CITRUS BELT CHAPTER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8715I Ill. SO 2733 Z C N A NENBERSHZP OURS 87152 103,66 103 I C N A RETIREMENT TRUST-4S7 DEFERlEO CONP ITIS3 1,357.00 1Z591 ZCEE - USA BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 81154 9.00 1121 INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE · 87155 6,800.92 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 87156 462°82 ¢.~52 INLAND ;NPIRE STAGES, LTD. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES · 87151 2,049.50 CIIY OF RANCHQ CUC ~A LIST OF NARRANI~ FOR PERZOO: OG-IS-94 (93/94) RUN DATE: 06/15/94 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. ANT. 3885 INLAND LANNHDNER 92 ZNLANO VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 612 JAESCNKE INC., 1829 jWP TELECOH ZNC, 609 KAMINEe STEZNER & UNGERER 396) KEATSe NARY ANN 4245 KZEFER g ASSOCZATESe ADOLPH 1218 KNOX 1024 KOCH NATERXALS COMPANY 172 KOZLOVZCMe DEBBZE 4217 LADNEe COATINGS 4269 LANOHEZERe ·ETSY 321 LANDSCAPE NEST 12594 LANGARICAe HICHAEL J. 12592 LANGERt ANXTA 849 LANSON PRODUCTSt ZNCo 1455 LQNG'S DRUGS 3356 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE· INC. 3201 LUPE & JOHNNY'S 8ODY i PAINT SHOP 956 MAC DONALD· laIN 722 MAGALLANESe LXNDA 72 HARK CHRIS· INC. 76 MARKNANeARCZYNSKZ·HANSDN·L KING 450 MARSHALL C HCKNZGHT TONXNGeINC. 12384 MARTINEZt VINCENT 3907 HASTER-SORTe ZNCe 12469 NATTRESS OUTLET 3015 HC CALL, SUSAN 1025 MC MASTER-CAR· SUPPLY COHPANY '12593 HZG COMHUNZCATZQNS 149 MZJAC ALARM CONPANT 3057 HZLLSe MARY 3960 NOLONET· JIM 1171 MOTOROLA CONNUN. 1020 MOUNTAIN YZEN GLASS & HXRROR 2350 HUNXCIPAL SE·VICES GROUP· INC. 412 N 8 Z ZZ&8 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE 3693 NATIONHIDE HOBZLE HONE 3693 NATIONHIDE MOBILE HONE 3693 NATIONHIDE MOBILE HONE 4034 NICHOLSe FRED 3332 NZCKLESe ARLIEEN 3323 NOYES, KEVZN 3S46 NURSERYLAND 527 OLVNPZC STUDIOS· INC, 67 ON-CALL COHHUNXCATIONS 2640 ON-CALL COHHUNICATZONS 3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER (~90 ORIGINALITY PLUS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS VEHZCLE HAZNTENANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION SUPPLIES HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ENERGENCY INSTALLATION CASH ADVANCE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DEPOSIT REFUND RECREATION REFUND NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES FXLN PROCESSING OIL ANALYSIS NAZNTENANCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYNENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOWING SERVICES REFUNDIDUPLZCATE PERMIT PRESORT HAIL SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PU·LXCATZON ALARN SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYHENT INSTRUCTOR PAYRENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES LEASE PAYNENT NAINTENANCE CONTRACT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIFORM SERVICES RENA8o PROGRAM REHA8. FROGRAN REHA·o PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT NILEAGE REZH·URSERENT LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYHENT MONTHLY SERVICES MONTHLY SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND ** CNECK8 OVERLAP 87158 1T,24 87159 116.48 87160 38.88 87161 68050 87162 93.00 81163 251.10 87164 17.51 t 87165 I·ZZS.79 I 87166 6,189.91 87167 1·074.00 87168 459,00 87169 lO0.O0 I 87170 73e730,68 87171 SOO.O0 87172 IZ.O0 17173 32.87 87174 107.73 87175 535,79 87176 496.73 81177 510.30 87178 235,95 8 81179 219043 87180 91381e33 I 87181 90.00 87 leZ S, OOO,O0 87183 289.11 87184 7.80 67185 34,80 87186 218,58 87187 46.82 87188 342.00 87189 135.00 87190 320.00 17191 876.01 87192 23.34 87 193 20 · 745.78 87194 1 ·AZG,OO I 87195 521.75 · 87196 db47.54 e 87197 5e944,00 87198 3·329.00 87199 1 ·988.,.00 · 87200 1e511032 87201 108,00 87202 46.20 17203 74,86 87204 1.945,,35 R 87205 74.93 · 87106 580.01 87207 835,20 87208 114030 CITY OF RANCHO CUCARQNGA LIST OF NAnRANTS FOR PERIODS 06-15-94 C93/943 VENDOR NAME ETEN DESCRIPTION NARR NO IdARR. ANTe 235 OMEN ELECTRIC 1823 PAGENET 417 PATTON SALES CORP. 8624 PEDUS SECURITY SERVICES, INC. 3173 PELTIBM, TARRY 3444 PERFECTION PRESS 1079 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA 255 PORA DISTRIBUTING CO 1049 POMONA VALLEY KANASAKZ 4159 PRENTZS, BETH 65 PRUOENTZAL 0VERALL SUPPLY 2St R L R AUTOMOTIVE i03l R J R DESIGN GROUP, INC. 418 R e A GROUP 959 RADIO SHACK ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 80 RAINBOW PHOTO LAB 626 MAUL Po ROBLES, SR. 4165 RBN LOCK g KEY SERVICE 545 RED WING SHOE STORE ZZO7 REDHONOR HIKE 1165 RICHARDSON AUTO 800T, inC. 3432 REDO, LZNOA 112 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 3335 ROSE, CHRZSTXE 3958 SALVIATED HARTHA 150 SAN BERN CO PUBLIC HEALTH DEFT 214 SAN BERN CO SOLID HASTE FIGMENT 132 SAN DIEGO ROTART 8ROOH C0o INC 4060 SANTA FE EQUIPMENT CO. 3067 SAUL, SANDY S3S SIMPLE, JUDY 8625 SHRAGG, DAVID 2SO? SEEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 3276 SINCLAIR PAINT 1327 SMART L FINAL 317 SO CALXF EDISON CO. 319 SO CALEF GAS CO. 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 646 STANOARO INSURANCE CO, 2344 TARGET 3733 TDR NORLO CONVERSIONSo LTD. 2718 TERRYo DONNA 3924 THOMAS, PEGGY Re 6626 TOOAT'S NENS DISTRIBUTION0 INC. 4271 TODD. TENT 1443 TURNER, ESTHER 693 U.S.IMHZTE VAN BATTERY COo, INC. .~912 UNIQUE CREATIONS $8 CHECKB OVERLAP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87209 PAGING $ERVXCE 87210 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87211 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87212 RECREATION SUPPLIES 87213 RECREATION SUPPLIES I 87214 PHOTO SUPPLIES I 87215 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE L SUPPLIES 87216 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87217 INSTRUCTOR PATRENT 87211 RAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87219 <<( 87220 - 8/ZZO )>> VEHICLE NAZNToSUPPLXESLSERVECE e 8147.21 PROPE$SZONAL SERVICES 87221 SOIL TESTING SERVICES 87223 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND B 8~224 PHOTO SUPPLIES I 87225 TIRE REPAIR 87226 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 81227 SAFETY BOOTS 872Z8 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 67229 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE t 87230 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 67231 CAMERA & SUPPLIES # 87232 PRINTS 8 67233 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87234 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87235 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 87236 MONTHLY SERVICE 87237 NAZNT SUPPLIES 87231 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87Z39 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87240 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT · 87241 RECREATION REFUNDS 87241 SERVICE/SUPPLIES I 87263 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87244 DaY CARP SUPPLIES 87245 HONTHLT ELECTRIC BILLINGS 8 87246 MONTHLY GAS BILLS I 87247 ((< 81248 - '87251 )>) MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS e 87252 INSURANCE PREMIUM 87253 YOUTH PROGRAM & OAT CAMP $UPPL I 87254 VEHICLE HAZNT SUPPLIES/SERVICE I 87255 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87256 RILEAGE 872S7 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 87258 RECREATION REFUNO 87259 NILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 87260 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES B7Z61 RECREATION SUPPLIES · 87Z62 236.91 63.00 68049 101.10 lOO.OO 301071 43o14 5,758,87 53.23 37.80 114.49 1,793.44 472e23 172.50 10.74 ISS.15 47.50 84.31 150000 84048 Z,Oe8.ll 63.00 256008 212.50 67.50 495.00 15,675,00 20974.07 258.60 134.39 181.SO 358.66 31.50 2,35Z.93 61.47 86.75 176.52 30739e16 107.50 S12.64 952.58 187.50 6.16 13.99 ZSO.OO 53.48 125.59 69e50 CZTY OF RANClIO CU LZST OF WARRAk._ FOR PERZOOS 06-15-94 (93/96) RUN DATE; 06/15/96 PAGE; VENDOR NANE ZTEli DESCRZPTZQN NARR NO WARR. AHTo 8617 VLASTOSt KATZNA 2052 WAGNER PACZFZC 478 WARREN L CD.w CARL 6002 WASTE liANAGERENT [NDUSTRZES 4160 WATKZNS, DAN 213 WAXZE, KLEEN-LZNE CORP 8628 WE ARE CABZNETS 267 HESTERN ROCK CO 8623 WZLESw RODERTA 4184 WZLLZAIISQN & SCIIIIZO 758 NZTS 8629 WZTTt ADONZS 8630 WZTTe BOB 8631 UZTTo fiXCAll 872 WXTTERe JOANNE 509 XEROX CO·PORATXON 8632 YAGGZe LZZ 8633 YeANEZe GXLBERT 371 ZEE IIEOZCAL SERVXCE 346 ZEP NANUFACTURZNG CDNPANY RECREATZON REFUNDS SURVEY SERVZCES LZAEILZTY CLAINS WASTE NANAGEIIENT INSTRUCTOR PAYNENT NAINT $UPPLZES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS ASPliALT L CONCRETE PARKING CZTATION REPUND ENGXNEERING $ERVZCES RECREACTXON $UPPLZES RECREATION REPUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS ZNSTRUCTOR PAYNENT COPY NACHZNE SUPPLZESISERVZCE RECREATZON REFUNDS DEPOSZT REFUND RECREATION SUPPLZE$ VEHICLE NAXNT $UPPLZE$ IS CHECKe OVERLAP 87263 16.00 67264 3e408000 e 87265 2t508.20 67266 54040 81'261 45000 t 877268 twOSguT4 87269 5°40 S 87270 383009 87271 30°00 87171 197120'78 · 87Z73 136.33 67276 16.00 87275 16000 877276 16.00 8727777 264.00 I 67278 ltT19o38 87279 12,00 87280 250.00 67281 135o20 67282 248024 TOTAL Z779e131.64 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRAP FOR PERIOD: 06-2, (93/94) RUN DATE: 06/23/94 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION MARR NO MARR. ANT. 744 GREAT NESTERR SAVINGS 85 CUCAMONGA CO MATER DIST 3408 HXNSON, KEXTH 6310 BARENOSE, MARY 6316 CARYN DEVELOPMENT COo, THE 6329 FREEMAN, TMONAS 6331 FU$COE ENGINEERING, INCo 8658 POHLSON, KEVZN R. 8657 PENINSULA GROUP, THE 6314 CARYN DEVELOPMENT CO.e THE 744 GREAT NESTERR SAVINGS 6307 DOUBLETREE CLUB MOTEL ZOSI COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO., ZNCo 3693 NATIONNZDE MOBILE HOME 3286 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL 4262 THINGS RENEMBERED 3366 8th AVENUE GRAPHICS I A L A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO., INto 3785 ACTION ART 3594 ALDU$ FULFILLMENT CENTER 4207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS 3191 ALMSLAD, KEN 264 ALPHA BETA 973 ALPHAGRAPHICS 2137 AMERICAN RED CROSS 2906 AMERICAN THERMOPLASTIC COMPANY 6301 ARZAZ, FRED 6309 ASHBY, ERIK 869 BADGER, THE 861 BANK OF AMERICA-CORPORATE 6311 BAUERLEt BRITTANY 1336 BIG A AUTO PARTS 1267 BLAKE PAPER COo, INC. 3583 BLANKS 4199 BONA INTERNATIONAL 620 8RONNe OIVEN g MENTSCMKE 6312 BROMN, VIKKI 457 C & E LUMBER CO 97 C P R S 3942 CAL NESTERR TERMITE PEST CONTROL ** CHECK# OVERLAP DEFERRED COMP 86145, 5,47Z.00 <(( 86146 - 86331 MONTMLY NATER BILLINGS 86332, 1,149.00- <<( 86333 - 86671 >)) MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 86672e 16.80- <<( 86673 - 86876 BOND FUNDING 86679, 2,586.00 BOND FUNDING 86880, Z15t979.00 60NO FUNDXNG 86881; 20,633.00 BOND FUNDING 86882e 277,248.00 <(( 86883 - 86887 >)> BOND FUNDING 86668, 63,512.00 BOMB FUNOING 86889, 101,000.00 <<< 86890 - 86891 BOND FUNDING 868928 11z,0zl.oo ((< 86893 - 87063 DEFERRED CONP 87064, 5,303.00 HOTEL RESERVATIONS 87065e 309.56 (<< 87066 - 87117 ))) MAINTENANCE $UPPLXES/REPAXR$ I 87118, 1,912o80- <(( 87119 - 87196 ))) REHABo PROGRAM I 87197, 5,964.00- (<( 87198 - 87284 )>) MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE 872658 66,506.48 ((( 87286 - 87286 >)) RECREATION SUPPLIES 87287e 89.97 (<< 81288 - 87293 >)> OFFICE SUPPLIES I 87294 280.30 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 87295 59.26 RECREATION SUPPLIES I 87296 3,148.64 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 87297 170.19 INSTALLATION/SERVICE 87298 4,016.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 87299 112.50 RECREATION SUPPLIES 87300 17.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 87301 323.25 FIRST AID CLASS 87302 395.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES I 87303 623.71 RECREATION REFUND 87304 20.00 RECREATION REFUND 87305 40.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 87306 132.51 AOMXNXSTRATXON FEES 87307 133,561.25 RECREATION REFUND 67308 5.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 87309 289.11 RECREATION SUPPLIES 87310 60.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 87311 384.70 PUBLICATION 87312 63,00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 87313 20,229.85 RECREATION REFUND 87314 88.50 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87315 200.48 SUBSCRIPTION 87316 130.00 MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE I 87317 101.51 L~ CITY OF RANClIO CUCANONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-22-94 (93/963 RUN DATE: 06/23/96 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION UARR NO MARR. ANTe el CNECXl OVERLAP 6313 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE L DOOR BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87318 Z2.eO 6277 CALIFORNIA CHAPTER OF NIGP, THE MEMBERSHIP FEES 87319 15o00 4260 CALIFORNIA REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87320 355.58 6315 CNANEY, ANAMARIE RECREATION REFUND 87321 Z.OO 713 CHZC~°S SPORTING GOODS INC RECREATION SUPPLIES 87322 43.06 6316 CHULLASOPONSRI, CNUTNAN RECREATION REFUND 87323 59.00 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INCe VEH[CLF MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES t 87326 569°03 76 CITY RENTALS EQUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES I 87325 1,076.68 4279 CLARK, DEBORAH REINDURSENENT ORAL BOARD 67326 60,14 6317 CLASSEN, JOYCE RECREATION REFUND 87327 59.00 6316 CLAYTON, FLORENCE RECREATION REFUND 87328 7e50 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87329 238.68 6319 COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH OF A.Lo RECREATION REFUND 87330 192e36 6320 COMPUTER DIMENSIONS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87331 &O.18 6321 CONSTOCK COIN CORNER BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87332 27°00 6278 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87333 47.26 2051 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO,, INCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/REPAiRS I 87336 1,972.78 8654 COURTHEY, UNA MAE RECREATION REFUNDS 67335 TeSO 6322 CROSS STATE ELECTRIC ZNC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87336 7°82 3192 CSS COMPUTER SERVICE L SALES OFFICE EQUIPMENT 87337 15.00 ((( 87338 - 87362 85 CUCAMONGA CO MATER OZST MONTHLY MATER 8ZLLZNGS t 87343 17,936e73 2512 DeA.R.E. AMERICA OeA.ReEe MATERIAL 87344 677.08 355 OANZELS TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES I 87345 9'22.62 6323 DELEON, OEQNZCZA RECREATION REFUND 87346 7o50 4105 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTS 87347 544e00 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 87348 74e61 523 EASTMAN, ZNC OFFICE SUPPLIES I 87369 810.30 6324 ENROCNA, IRENE RECREATION REFUNO 87350 7o50 3312 ESKENAZZ, NOISES REINS. CERTiFICATiON RENEMAL 87351 45.00 6325 FARHINt 6EHNAZ RECREATION REFUND 67352 29°50 2121 FARR'S - RANCHO CUCANONGA OFFICE SUPPLIES I 87353 50.94 6326 FASSON ROLL DiViSiON BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87354 56°46 184 FIELDNAN, ROLAPP g ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 87355 12,500.00 6327 FZNAU, KULAEA RECREATION REFUND 87356 160o00 4917 FLAGHOUSE RECREATION SUPPLIES 8 87357 177.30 830 FOOTHILL LAMNNONER SERVICE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT I 87358 516elz 3947 FOURTH STREET ROCK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87359 574.08 1128 FRAMATXC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES i 87360 662.90 1144 FRAHE-ART OFFICE SUPPLIES 87361 457.93 1081 FRANKLIN QUEST CO, OFFICE SUPPLIES 87362 42,88 6328 FREEDOM SOFTMARE SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87363 10.00 6330 FRYHARK, NZNA RECREATION REFUND 87364 15.00 6332 GOMEZ, CAL RECREATION REFUND 87365 7o50 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS I 87366 6,127.21 12599 HAMILTON, VZVZAN RECREATION REFUND 87367 15.00 4196 HANSON OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 87368 67,02 12600 HANKER, CHRISTIRE RECREATION REFUND 87)69 35.00 12601 HANKERe KATHERINE RECREATION REFUND 87370 35.00 3408 HZNSON, KEZTH NILEAGE REZRBURSEHENT 87371 16.80 4033 HONE DEPOT CRC PROGRAM, THE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 8737Z 386.65 · I · · · · · CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~'GA LEST Of MARRAN FOR PERZOO: 06-22' (93/94) RUN DATE: 06/Z3/96 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME iTEM DESCREPTION WARR NO NARR. ANTe IS CMECKt OVERLAP 3633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PRGMS L EDUCATZON MONTHLY SERVICES 87373 260.00 3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 93196 CDBG CONTRACT 87374 545°00 4188 Z O BURR HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 87375 561o77 45 INLAND FACTORS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 87376 307.76 3885 ENLAND LANNMONER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 87377 146.36 907 iNLAND MEDIATION BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE 87378 841.39 12595 iNTEGRA PLASTICS BLON AND iNJ HOLD BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87379 23.21 1829 JiP TELECDM INC. TELEPHONE SERVICES 87380 162.90 62Z8 K O K ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTORS CONTRACT SERVICES 87381 73.,302.30 6273 KARBONSKZ, ANTHONY HAINTENANCE 87362 ZOO.O0 IZBOZ KELLY,, KEXTH RECREATION REFUND 87383 7.50 E211 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87384 10.35 195 LANCE", SQLL L LUNGHARO AUDIT SERVICES 67385 9,358.75 149 LANSON PRODUCTS", INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87386 29.85 3957 LEISURE CRAFT RECREATION SUPPLIES 87387 162.92 12596 LZEBMAN.,REINER, HCNEZL L NALSH BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 87388 265.75 1Z606 LEH, HYUN RECREATION REFUND 87389 2.65 1372 LITTLE RED SCHOOL HOUSE PLAYSCHOOL SUPPLIES 81390 26.63 6178 LONCAR., PHiL CeEeReTo INSTRUCTOR 87391 125.00 1455 LONG'S DRUGS FiLM PROCESSING 87392 214.50 12603 LOVE", KATHY RECREATION REFUND 87393 16.00 386 LYON CO., NiLLEAN REFUNDABLE DEPOSITS 67396 34,000.00 1062 N C I TELECOMNUNXCATXON$ TELEPHONE SERVICES I 87395 511.98 &126 NIP ENGENEERS CONTRACT SERVICES 87396 3,812.00 12598 NARTXNEZ., fiXKEY RECREATION REFUND 87397 28.00 1Z510 NC COLHe AiLEEN RECREATION REFUND 87398 20.00 17597 fiEBANE, MARCY RECREATION REFUND 87399 29.50 T&9 HXJAC ALARM COMPANY ALARM SERVICES J 87400 911.00 3860 MOBILE MINi STORAGE SYSTEMS STORAGE SUPPLIES 87401' 2,307.36 1754 MOORE, DAVE REIHDotFOUNDERS DAY SUPPLIES 87602 37.32 12606 NULLICANE., ADAH RECREATION REFUND 87403 28.00 875 N 6 S/LONRT FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE I 87406 6",450°00 2268 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 87405 90.00 593 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCiATiON NNA MEMBERSHIP DUES 87606 26.00 3637 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNZFORN SERVICES I 87407 366.73 3693 NATEONNEOE MOBILE HONE REMAB. PROGRAM 87608 3693 NATIONHIDE MOBILE HONE REMADe PROGRAM 87609 3,263.00 3693 NATIONHiDE MOBILE HOME REMA6. PROGRAM 87410 1,851o00 4281 NZCASSIO., TONY INSTRUCTOR-CoEoR.T 67611 112o50 3632 OLDTENER$ FOUNDATION OLDTiMERS FOUNDATION 8741Z 901.96 232 ONNZTRANS BUS PASSES 87613 196o00 1226 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SVC, INC. STRIPING SERVICES 876t4 1,064.78 8636 PANDURANGZe AJAX RECREATION REFUNDS 87415 29°50 8635 PAREDES, DANIEL RECREATION REFUNDS 87416 35.10 86)6 PARRAS., NARLINA RECREATION REFUNDS 87617 28.00 487 PATTON SALES CORP. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87418 413.20 8637 PERFORNANCE MICRO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 87419 32.50 8638 PHELPS, SHELBY RECREATION REFUNDS 87420 5.00 8639 PHXFER., JOAN CITATION REFUNO 87421 30.00 8640 PENENTEL, RUDT RECREATION REFUNDS 87622 30.00 562 PIP PRINTING RECREATEON SUPPLIES I 87423 739o91 · · · u CZlY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIODS 06-22-94 (93/94) RUN DATE: 06123194 PAGE: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARM NO WARRo ANTe 272 8641 65 3663 4025 418 2705 545 8642 864 3 276 8644 4266 8645 8646 571 305 300 303 1105 8647 ZSOT 2143 3175 351 I327 36 8648 PITNEY 8OWES PROPERTY SERVICES PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY R & T SPECIALTY, iNC. R J SUPPLY CO. R M A GROUP R.H,F., INC. RED WING SHOE STORE REELEY, MXCHELLE RELIABLE CONCRETE&BUILDING CONTRS RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT ROBERTS, DANIEL RUBENSAT SATELLITE OXSTRIBUTQRS RUXZe JESUS SAMPATe SHEXLA SAN BERN CO OFFICE OF MNGHNT SVC SAN eERN COUNTY TRANSPQRTATTQN/FLD SAN eERNAROZNO COUNTY SAN eERNARDINO COUNTY SEAL FURNITURE L SYSTEHS INC. SHIN, JESSICA SZEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SIERRA SCREENPRINT GRAPHICS SIGN CENTER, INCe, THE SIGN SHOP, THE SMART L FINAL SNXDEELE, ERA SNEOAKER, 8ETSY 317 SO CALIF EOXSON CO. 3IT SO CALIF EDISON CO. 319 S0 CALZF GAS CO. 1432 8669 322 8650 836 4280 3302 8651 8652 8344 8653 2958 4202 1054 862I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUZA. RUTH SPARKLETTS SULLENSo LOROZN TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TIE/COMMUNICATiONS, XNCo TQXGUARD SYSTEMS, INC. TRANSAMERZCA OCCo LIFE iNS. CO. TRI CALC INDUSTRIES TRX-CMAPTER (CALDO) UeS. NAILS UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNIQUE TRUCK EQUIPMENT UNITED TITLE COMPANY VZOALe MARIA POSTAGE HETER RENTAL BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES O.A.R.E. SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SOIL TESTING SERVICES ** CMECKI e 8~430 - OVERLAP 87424 87425 8~426 87427 87428 87429 81430 ))) VEHICLE NAZNT SERVICE&SUPPLIES # 8743X SAFETY 80OTS 87432 RECREATION REFUNDS 87433 8USZNESS LICENSE REFUNDS 87434 ((( 87435 - 87435 >)) PRINTS I 87436 RECREATION REFUNDS 87437 REPAIR SATELLITE DiSH 87638 RECREATION REFUNDS 67439 RECREATION REFUNDS 87460 TELEPROCESSZNG SERVICES AGREEMENT FLOOD CONTROL 87~k2 REXNO PARKING CITATIONS 874,4,3 ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 87~b6 OFFICE SUPPLIES I 87445 RECREATION REFUNDS 87446 SERVICE/SUPPLIES 87447 POLICE SUPPLIES 87.8 NAXNT SUPPLIES 87449 HAZNT SUPPLIES I 87450 OAY CARP SUPPLIES I 87451 PETTY CASH - COMMUNITY SVCS I 87452 RECREATION REFUNDS 87453 ((( 87454 - 87454 >>) NONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS I 87455 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 87456 NONTMLY GAS BILLS 8 87457 ((( 87458 - 87465 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS I 87466 RECREATION REFUNDS 87467 MONTHLY SERVICE I 87468 RECREATION REFUNDS 87469 NAZNT SUPPLIES 8 87470 PHONE SERVICE I 8747I SERVICE CONTRACT-RECYCLING 87472 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 87473 DEPOSIT REFUND 81474 SEMINAR 87415 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDJ 87476 UMP SERVICES I 87477 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 87478 ((( 87479 - 87479 INSURANCE I 87460 RECREATIN REFUNDS 87481 242.96 6.15 276.31 392.04 18.45 840.00 197.70 150.00 S.O0 38.43 4,t16.26 28.00 50.00 7.50 29.50 287.00 1,415o00 610.00 8.89 829.68 35.00 1,936.00 86.89 125o12 93.09 452.91 73.I5 Z9.50 73e295.52 139.36 223.88 9,012.66 15.00 74.00 22.50 117.87 693.00 341.99 632.18 IeSO0.OO 510.00 45.36 3,629.75 123.45 4,700.00 16.00 I I · · · · · · · · · · CITY OF IANCHO CUCf 'A LIST OF MARRAN*, FOR PERIOOl 06-2Z-v~ (93196) RUN DATE: 06/Z3/94 PAGE: 5 VENDOR NANE ZTEN DESCRIPTION MARR NO WARRo ANT, 3422 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 667 VISA 478 WARREN G COo, CARL 213 WAXIE. KLEEN-LINE CORP 1961 WESTERN TURF G COHNERCIAL 758 WITS 8655 WREN, BILLY C TRACEY 675 RYNN'S FROSTEHP/HAXAIR 509 XEROX CORPORATION 6656 ZEZGLER, HYRTLE OFFICE SUPPL[ES VISA HONTHLY 6ZLLZNGS LIAOXLITY CLAXNS NAINT SUPPLIES HA[NT SUPPLIES RECREACTXON SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES COPY NACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE RECREATZON REFUNDS ** CHECKe OVERLAP I 87462 63.11 # 87483 1,285.79 81484 231o20 8 87485 565.26 t 87486 4.5I 87467 60.34 e7488 Z8.O0 87489 218,01 I 87490 3,943°66 87491 7.50 TOTAL 10338,868.62 · · AFIKJCAT!ON FOIl ALCOHOUC: IffltAel LJCiNSI(S) To: Dep,~a.~t of AJcok~"c Severage Control 1901 &~ Sor. mnmwo, Colif. 9~818 The unders~gned hereby ;ic~nse: deKribed as followre: 2. NAME(S) OF APIqJCANT(S) I. T'YP~(S) OF L]CENS[(S) FJfE Al~lled ulcer ~c. 24044 [] 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) ;~r to Per RECE|i~ I GEOGRAPH CAL CON I E~ect~ve Date: $ UC. 12. Af~icont ogrees (a) that any monaget employeel in on-sele licensed premises will have all me qualificatieu of a licensee, and (b) that he will hoe violets or cauw or permit to he violated ~ny of the provisions of Ihe Alcoholic Beverage CcNttrol Act. ,3. STA~ OF CAUr. OeNL4 C.,.~ of ..... ............................................................ ................. :__.S~_L.~e___$__ ................................................................................. AINNF. AllON IY IS. STATE OF CAtlFOINIA CMey of___=,~L_J;'aNAaD~ e.; ............ Dine .... ~ ................ 14 . ,/ RAMONA MARKET 9950 FOOTHILL BLVD., UNITS A & B RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 APN 1077-621-34 A business within RANCHO CUCAMONGA VILLAGE - 9950 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Currently Zoned: Community Commercidl, Subarea 3 of the Foothill Specific Plan Zoning of Adjacent Properties: North: South: East: West: Medium/Low Residential Medium Residential Commercial/Office, Subarea 3 of the Foothill Specific Plan Commercial/Office, Subarea 3 of the Foothill Specific Plan CO PY ~ m~ ~m~m~m mH mm~m APPUCATION FOR ALCOHOUC liVII, AGi UCINSi(S) To: D/f)ckh,,ent o~ Alcoholic Beverage Cofitrol 1901 Srooci~zy R4-Tez-~cte Socramemo, Calif. 95818 The undersigned hereby applies for llc~reses deKrtbed a, follows: 2. NAME(S) OF APRICANT(S) C)R]3-T]~2,At Z'~r/a G, De Nee We.~e Aimre rkle UN--/er Heedelee~ers ORIce Only 1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO. Allied under Sec. 24044 [] Effec~ve Date. Toe 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) AmmaJ. Fee Effective D~te: FEE LIC. $ 4. Name clf Bu~ne~l Reckl, s~i.~. ~uzrZa 5. Location of Business--Number and S~reet 9615 J?OOt, J:ltll S~w Ty~ of ticmn~ ~Z'~5 8. ~li~ A~r~ (if different from 5)--NumNr a~ Str~ 9. H~e you ev~ b~n c~vi~ of o fel~y? 10. Have you ev~ violo~ any ~ ~e ~vi~s of ~e Alcoholic Beverage Con~ k raining to ~e 11. Expl~n a "YES" antwer ~ i~ms 9 or 10 on an a,~hmem which sh~ ~ d,m~ ~ ~ this applica~o~. 12. A~l~ont ~rm (o) that any manager employ~ in on-~le licen~d premises will have all ~e q~iifico~s of o licens,, and (b) t~t he will not viola~ ~ cau~ or ~ ~ h ~olatd any of the ~ovigons of the Alcoholic kverage Canal Ad. 13. STATE OF CALI~NIA Coun~ 'of APPLICA~ON IY ~ANS~ROI IS. STATE OF CALI~RNIA Coun~ of ...................................... ~ ............................. 16. Name(s) of Licen~s) 17. S~na~r~s) of Licen~s) 18. Licen~ Numb(s) 19. Location Number and Street City and Zip Code County Do Not Write Beloea TAb Line; For Departmelee [;M C)~f Attached: [] RKorded notice, ~ Fidocim'y papers, [] ......................... _- ......................... COPIES MAILED 'l I I~ ~ [] lene~al: Fee of ........... I~d at ........................... O~qce on ................. ~e~ No ....................... North FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 9583 RANCHO TERRACE CENTER ROCKY:S NEW YORK PIZZERIA 9615 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 I.j_l Z tJ.J "r 9585 9587 9589 Currently Zoned: Commercial/Office in Subarea 3 of the Foothill Specific Plan Zoning of Adjacent Properties: North: South: East: West: Community Commercial/Special Commercial Subarea 3 of the Foothill Specific Plan Low Residential Special Commercial, Subarea 3 of the Foothill Specific Plan Community Commercial, Subarea 3 of the Foothill Specific Plan 9605 96()9 q611 9613 /c)617 9610 9621 / 9625 ~aq~ ~/N~/Q~17 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I EXTENSION OF COMCAST CABLR T.V. FRANCHISE RECOMMENDATION Adoption of Resolution 91-012-Q extending Comcast's Franchise License for 90 days. BACKGROUND The City staff would appreciate the opportunity to continue the negotiations with Comcast to ensure that every opportunity has been made available to Comcast to obtain a Franchise License. Respectfully submitted, Susan Mickey Management Analyst I SM:dk Attachment da~a\susan.cbl 1R~SOI~C~I NO. 91-012-Q A RESOIjUTION OF ~HE CITY ClIRCCIL OF ~ME CITY OF RANCMD CLiZAMZIqGA, CAL~, EXT~qDIN3 CXXIqTY OF SAN BEZ~EEaDINO FRANCHISE LICBNSE ~ CI!eZASE CABLE T.V. MR 90 BAYS UPCI¢ EXPIRATICIq OF (XRPaNE LIC~CSE WTIEEN ~ME CITY OF M{BREAS, the Franchise License granted to Omxmst Cable T.V. by the County of San BexTerdj3~ ard gr'andfat)~ into the City of Rancho will expire cll July 22, 1994; and W~mPaAS, negotiati~m are ~rloing be~__----~ the City of Rm=ho and ~ Cable T.V.; and Mi~REAS, all terms and oonditicrs of the current license will continue the same. NOW, ~HBREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rarrho O~,:ahum,j~s d~ hereby resolve to extend the Franc~-~e Lioense far 90 days after the expiration of the current County of San Bernardino Lioerse. 19 DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Coundl lack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF COMPENSATION RESOLUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/1995 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which sets levels of compensation for employees for fiscal year 1994/95, effective July 1, 1994. Background During the past two months staff has met with the City's three bargaining groups. For the first time in four years, the City has the financial ability to offer a modest package to the employees and the General Employee group has accepted the offer. The remaining groups have not reached settlements; accordingly any agreements will be returned to the City Council when they occur. The financial contents of those agreements (2% COLA) are contained in the attached salary resolution. Funding for the adjustment is available within the existing approved 1994/95 budget and does not need any further appropriation. Two other changes of consequence to the resolution are: 1) The incorporation of the Library positions which have been previously approved by the City Council, but had not been made part of the comprehensive salary resolution; and, 2) The creation of a two-tiered benefit program. This later proposal will contain the City's long term medical insurance costs since new employees will be limited to a fixed dollar amount for medical insurance. Current employees will not be affected. Res ectfull ubmitted, es Director RCD/dah ~N,_attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-142 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it competes in a marketplace to obtain qualified personnel to perform and provide municipal services, and that compensation and conditions of employment must be sufficiently attractive to recruit and retain qualified employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: SECTION 1: Salary Ranges ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES (Monthly Amounts) Class Title Account Clerk I Account Clerk II Account Technician Accountant# Accounting Manager* Accts Payable Supervisor~ Admin Secretary !/ Admin Services Director+ Animal Control Officer I Animal Control Officer II Associate Engineer# Associate Park Planner# Associate Planner# Asst Building Official* Asst City Manager+ Asst Deputy City Clerk 1_/ Asst Engineer# Asst Landscape Designer# Asst Park Planner# Asst Planner~ Asst RDA Analyst# Asst to City Manager* Benefits Technician Building Inspection Supv# Building Inspector ~/ Minimum Step Amount Control Point Maximum Step Amount Step Amount 315 1,667 355 2,035 335 1,842 375 2,248 370 2,193 410 2,677 405 2,611 445 3,188 479 3,777 519 4,611 396 2,497 436 3,048 374 2,237 414 2,731 555 5,517 595 6,736 337 1,860 377 2,271 357 2,055 397 2,509 471 3,629 511 4,430 438 3,078 478 3,758 448 3,236 488 3,950 506 4,321 546 5,275 599 6,871 639 8,391 321 1,717 361 2,097 441 3,125 481 3,815 396 2,497 436 3,048 418 2,786 458 3,401 429 2,943 469 3,593 408 2,650 448 3,236 494 4,070 534 4,969 349 1,975 389 2,411 450 3,268 490 3,990 414 2,731 454 3,334 365 2,139 385 2,363 420 2,814 455 3,351 529 4,846 446 3,204 424 2,871 625 7,825 387 2,387 407 2,637 521 4,657 488 3,950 498 4,152 556 5,545 669 9,740 371 2,204 491 4,010 446 3,204 468 3,575 479 3,777 458 3,401 544 5,223 399 2,534 500 4,194 464 3,505 21 Resolution No. 94- P age 2 Class Title Building Maintenance Worker_2/ Building Official+ Business License Clerk Business License Supv# Business License Tech Buyer# Cashier/Account Clerk City Engineer+ City Manager+ City Planner+ Code Enforcement Officer 2/ Code Enforcement Supv~ 2_/' Code Enforcement Tech Community Dev Director+ Community Services Director+ Community Services Manager+ Con~nunity Services Officer Community Services Tech Computer Operator Counter Plans Examiner# Crime Analyst# Custodian 2/ Data Base Managmnt Analyst~ Data Processing Manager* Deputy City Clerk# Deputy City Engineer* Deputy City Manager+ Deputy City Planner* Disaster Prep Manager* Disaster Prep Specialist Electrical Specialist# 2_/ Engineering Aide Engineering Technician Equipment Operator 2/ Executive Assistant~ Faci l iti es Supervisor# Finance Officer+ Fleet Maintenance Supt* 2/ GIS Supervisor# ' GIS Technician Integrated Waste Coordinator* Inventory Special. Equip/Mat 2_/ Junior Engineer Junior Engineering Aide Landscape Designer# Lead Maintenance Worker _2/ Lead Mechanic 2_/ Librarian I Librarian II# Minimum Step Amount 340 1,888 540 5,120 338 1,869 399 2,534 368 2,171 396 2,547 315 1,667 560 5,657 552 5,436 398 2,522 424 2,871 358 2,065 590 6,570 545 5,249 526 4,774 376 2,260 384 2,351 367 2,160 440 3,109 419 2,800 340 1,888 465 3,522 494 4,070 382 2,328 526 4,774 546 5,275 518 4,588 479 3,777 393 2,459 430 2,958 385 2,363 405 2,611 368 2,171 409 2,664 434 3,017 525 4,751 474 3,684 448 3,236 397 2,509 496 4,111 344 1,926 415 2,745 365 2,139 4 26 2,899 378 2,282 402 2,572 400 2,547 418 2,786 Control Point Step Amount 380 2,305 580 6,250 378 2,282 439 3,094 408 2,650 436 3,048 355 2,035 600 6,906 666 9,596 592 6,636 438 3,078 464 3,505 398 2,522 630 8,023 585 6,408 566 5,829 416 2,758 424 2,871 407 2,637 480 3,791 459 3,418 380 2,305 505 4,300 534 4,969 422 2,842 566 5,800 586 6,400 558 5,601 519 4,611 433 3,002 470 3,611 425 2,885 445 3,188 408 2,650 449 3,252 474 3,684 565 5,800 514 4,497 488 3,950 437 3,063 536 5,019 384 2,351 455 3,351 405 2,611 466 3,540 418 2,786 442 3,140 440 3,109 458 3,401 Maximum Step Amoutn 390 2,423 610 7,260 388 2,399 449 3,252 418 2,786 446 3,204 365 2,139 630 8,023 622 7,709 448 3,236 474 3,684 408 2,650 660 9,312 615 7,444 596 6,769 426 2,899 434 3,017 417 2,772 490 3,990 469 3,593 390 2,423 515 4,520 544 5,223 432 2,988 576 6,127 616 7,481 568 5,887 529 4,846 443 3,156 480 3,796 435 3,033 455 3,351 418 2,786 459 3,418 484 3,872 595 6,736 524 4,727 498 4,152 447 3,220 546 5,275 394 2,472 465 3,522 415 2,745 476 3,721 428 2,929 452 3,301 450 3,268 468 3,575 Class Title Minimum Step Amount Library Assistant I 318 1,692 Library Assistant II# 350 1,985 Library Clerk 313 1,650 Library Manager+ 524 4,727 Library Technician 394 2,472 Maint Supervisor# 2/ 434 3,017 Maint Mechanic 2__/ 387 2,387 Maint Worker 2/ 340 1,888 Management Aile 393 2,459 Management Analyst I# 419 2,800 Management Analyst II# 448 3,236 Mechanic 2_/ 387 2,387 Mechanic's Assistant 2/ 340 1,888 Microcomputer SpecialTst 397 2,509 Office Services Clerk 311 1,634 Office Specialist I 291 1,479 Office Specialist II 1/ 311 1,634 Park Construction/Acq~ist Supv# 464 3,505 Park Planning/Dev Supt* 481 3,815 Park/Lands. Maint Supt* 2_/ 474 3,684 Personnel Analyst I# 397 2,509 Personnel Analyst II# 448 3,236 Personnel Clerk 339 1,879 Personnel/Risk Manager* 494 4,070 Plan Check Coordinator* 476 3,721 Planning Commission Secy# 382 2,328 Planning Technician 373 2,226 Plans Examiner# 430 2,958 Plans Examiner-Grading# 2/ 430 2,958 Plumbing/Mechanical SpecTalist# 430 2,958 Police Clerk** 317 1,684 Principal Librarian* 456 3,367 Principal Planner* 498 4,152 Principal Plans Examiner# 456 3,367 Programmer/Analyst# 446 3,204 Public Service Technician 365 2,139 Public Works Engineer* 2/ 496 4,111 Public Works Inspector T 2/ 397 2,509 Public Works Inspector II'2/ 417 2,772 Public Works Maint Mgr* ~/' 504 4,278 Purchasing Agent* 479 3,777 Receptionist 301 1,554 Records Clerk 311 1,634 Records Manager/City Clerk* 508 4,364 Recreation Coordinator 391 2,435 Recreation Superintendent* 492 4,030 Recreation Supervisor# 417 2,772 Redevelopment Analyst# 438 3,078 Redevelopment Manager+ 537 5,044 Rehab Specialist# 2/ 430 2,958 Control Point Step Amount 358 2,065 390 2,423 353 2,015 564 5,771 434 3,017 474 3,684 427 2,914 380 2,305 433 3,002 459 3,418 488 3,950 427 2,914 380 2,305 437 3,063 351 1,995 331 1,805 351 1,995 504 4,278 521 4,657 514 4,497 437 3,063 488 3,950 379 2,294 534 4,969 516 4,542 422 2,842 413 2,717 470 3,611 470 3,611 470 3,611 357 2,055 496 4,111 538 5,069 496 4,1ll 486 3,911 405 2,611 536 5,019 437 3,063 457 3,384 544 5,223 519 4,611 341 1,898 351 1,995 548 5,328 431 2,973 532 4,919 457 3,384 478 3,758 577 6,157 470 3,611 Resolution No. 94- Page Maximum Step Amount 368 2,171 400 2,547 363 2,118 594 6,702 444 3,172 484 3,872 437 3,063 390 2,423 443 3,156 469 3,593 498 4,152 437 3,063 390 2,423 447 3,220 361 2,097 341 1,888 361 2,097 514 4,497 531 4,895 524 4,727 447 3,220 498 4,152 389 2,411 544 5,223 526 4,774 432 2,988 423 2,856 480 3,796 480 3,796 480 3,896 367 2,160 506 4,321 548 5,328 506 4,321 496 4,111 415 2,745 546 5,275 447 3,220 467 3,557 554 5,490 529 4,846 351 1,995 361 2,097 558 5,601 441 3,125 542 5,171 467 3,557 488 3,950 607 7,152 480 3,796 Resolution No. 94- P age 4 Class Title Control Minimum Point Maximum Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Resource Services Supv# 448 3,236 488 3,950 498 4,152 Risk Management Analyst# 423 2,856 463 3,487 473 3,665 Secretary ~/ 344 1,926 384 2,351 394 2,472 Signal & Lighting Tech 2/ 418 2,786 458 3,401 468 3,575 Special Districts Super# 448 3,236 488 3,950 498 4,152 Special Districts Tech 384 2,351 424 2,871 434 3,017 Special Districts Tech II 404 2,598 444 3,172 454 3,334 Sr Account Tech 384 2,351 424 2,871 434 3,017 Sr Accountantl 448 3,236 488 3,950 498 4,152 Sr Administrative Secy 1/ 382 2,328 422 2,842 432 2,988 Sr Business License Tec~ 383 2,340 423 2,856 433 3,002 Sr Civil Engineer* 506 4,321 546 5,275 556 5,545 Sr GIS Technician 417 2,772 457 3,384 467 3,557 Sr Maintenance Worker 2__/ 350 1,985 390 2,423 400 2,547 Sr Planner* 478 3,758 518 4,588 528 4,822 Sr Plans Examiner-Bldg# 450 3,268 490 3,990 500 4,194 Sr Plans Examiner-Fire# 450 3,268 490 3,990 500 4,194 Sr Records Clerk 321 1,717 361 2,097 371 2,204 Sr Redevelopment Analyst* 468 3,575 508 4,364 518 4,588 St/Storm Drain Maint Supt*2_/ 474 3,684 514 4,497 524 4,727 Structural Specialistl 2/ 430 2,958 470 3,611 480 3,796 Superv Animal Cntrl OffTcer# 383 2,340 423 2,856 433 3,002 Superv Public Works Insp~ 2_/ 443 3,156 483 3,853 493 4,050 Systems Analyst# 465 3,522 505 4,300 515 4,520 Technician 368 2,171 408 2,650 418 2,786 Traffic Engineer* 511 4,430 551 5,408 561 5,685 Admi n Intern 287 8.36 327 10.21 337 10.73 Asst Pool Manager 272 7.76 312 9.47 322 g.g6 Crossing Guards 207 5.61 247 6.85 257 7.20 Instructor/Guard I 207 5.61 247 6.85 257 7.20 Instructor/Guard II 247 6.85 287 8.36 297 8.79 Library Aide 158 4.39 198 5.37 208 5.63 Library Clerk 313 9.52 353 11.62 363 12.22 Library Page 198 5.37 238 6.55 248 6.88 Maint Tech 247 6.85 287 8.36 297 8.79 Planning Aide 287 8.36 327 10.21 337 10.73 Pool Manager 296 8.75 336 10.68 346 11.22 Program Specialist 278 8.00 318 9.76 328 10.26 Recreation Aide 168 4.62 208 5.94 218 5.93 Recreation Assistant I 207 5.61 247 6.85 257 7.20 Recreation Assistant II 233 6.39 273 7.80 283 8.20 Recreation Leader 257 ~.20 297 8.79 307 9.24 **This classification when assigned to shifts other than day shift shall have an additional pay of 40 cents per hour. !/When acting as Clerk to Council/Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of $50 at the option of the employee. Resolution No. 94- Page S _2/Up to $150 provided annually toward purchase of approved safety footware from a city designated vendor· ~ Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class * Denotes Management Class + Denotes Executive Class Executive Management employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 15% (30 salary code steps) above the control point. All other employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% {40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 5% {10 salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments, growth within the position. SECTION 3: Three tiered Management Program Employees designated as either Professional/Supervisory, Management, or Executive Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general employees and the following: Supervisory/Professional Administrative leave to a maximum of fifty hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. Life insurance policy of an additional twenty thousand dollars. Deferred compensation program of two percent of salary. Management Administrative leave to a maximum of seventy five hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. Life insurance policy of an additional twenty thousand dollars. Deferred compensation program of four percent of salary. Executive Management Administrative leave to a maximum of one hundred hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. Automobile allowance of $250.00 per month if a City vehicle is not provided. Life insurance policy of an additional thirty thousand dollars. Deferred compensation program of six percent of salary. Resolution No. 94- Page 6 SECTION 4: Life Insurance The City provides $30,000 base coverage of life insurance for all employees. Employees who want to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the city's group rate. SECTION 5: Health Insurance The City provides health insurance plans available to all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of medical insurance for all current employees as one group, providing for no additional payment by employees for coverage through June 30, 1995. The City will provide up to $337 per month in medical coverage for all full time employees hired after July 1, 1994. SECTION 6: Retiree Medical Employees who retire at the age of 55 or above with ten years of service with the City of Rancho Cucamonga can pay for medical insurance at a group rate through the City until 18 months prior to the age of 65 at which time they can convert to Cobra. SECTION 7: Dental Insurance The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of dental insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials effective July 1, 1994. SECTION 8: Optical Insurance The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees and elected officials. The City agrees to average the cost of optical insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees and elected officials effective July 1, 1994. SECTION 9: Vacation All full-time emplo es shall, with continuous service, working hours of vacation monthly according to the following schedule: Length of Service Hours Accrued Annual Hours in Years Per Pay Period Accrued 1 3.077 80 2 3.461 90 3 3.846 100 4 4,230 110 5 4,615 120 6-8 5.000 130 g 5.384 140 10 5.769 150 11-13 6.153 160 14 6,538 170 15+ 6.923 180 accrue SECTION 10: Sick Leave Resolution No. 94- Page 7 All full~time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. SECTION 11: Sick Leave Buyback Employees who terminate their city employment after five years of continuous service and have at least 50% of five years' sick leave accrued on the books upon termination can sell 120 hours back to the City. SECTION 12: Personal Leave Employees can use up to 20 hours of accrued sick leave as personal leave. This 20 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., I hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for emergency situations requiring the employee's attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. SECTION 13: Holidays The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full time continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days. (3) (7) (togl July 4 - Independence Day September 5 - Labor Day - The first Monday in September Novenber 10 - Veteran's Day November - Thanksgivin Day (November 24) November - The day following Thanksgiving (floater) December 22 - The day preceding Christmas December 26 - Christmas Day January 2 - New Years January 16 - Martin Luther King°s Birthday February 20 - President's Day May 29 - Memorial Day Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her convenience who has successfully completed probation subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to next. Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc) where two consecutive days are holida s and it ld result in the City Hall being open to serve the public only ~Ydays wou during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and the other holiday will become a floating holiday. For example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday, however Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. In the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Years, employees will have until June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also those daXs will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occure~. Each year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays. Resolution No. 94- P age 8 For fiscal year 93-94 floating holidays will be provided for the day following Thanksgiving and the day preceeding Christmas Day. SECTION 14: Holiday Time The City aqrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not their regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time and one-half for workinq that day. This time and one-half may be taken as compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank, (in effect, compensating at double time and one-half). That rate of compensation is tallied as follows: the ten hours compensation for the holiday, plus compensation at time and one-half for the hours actually work. This payment at time and one-half abrogates the employees right to that holiday. SECTION 15: Premium Holiday Compensation Maintenance employees required as part of the regular work assiqnment to work on Christmas Day, New Years Day, Independence Day or Thanksgivin~ Day, are allowed to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these employees who work on the aforementioned designated holidays may select to receive compensation on that holiday at time and one-half for the ten hour shift, or take a second holiday as time off at a later date. SECTION 16: Natal and Adoption Leave without Pay Employees are granted up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption of a child. Employees on this leave of absence without pay will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence. SECTION 17: Natal and Adoption Leave with Pay Employees are granted up to 2 days natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or adoption of a child. Any paid time required beyond this initial ~ ~9~2y must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating ol time. SECTION 18: Bereavement Leave When a death occurs in the family of a full time employee, the employee shall be granted up to five (5) bereavement leave days with pay. Family members are defined as follows: employee's spouse, employee's parents, employee's grandparents, employee's children, employee's spouse's parents, siblings, a blood relative residing with employee. The department head and the City Manager shall approve such bereavement leave. SECTION lg: Military Leave Employees required to serve military leave wi'll be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period. Resolution No. 94- Page g SECTION 20: Overtime - Maintenance The City- agrees that ~nployees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 10 worked in that shift. Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or emergency situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in excess of 10 in that 12 hour shift will be paid at time and one- half, regardless of the total numbers of compensated hours for that work week. SECTION 21: Standby Pay Employees required to be on standby shall be compensated at the rate of $128 per week. SECTION 22: Safety Footwear The City will provide up to $150 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear as part of their job responsibilities. SECTION 23: Confidential Employees Confidential employees are designated as such when an employee in the course of his or her duties, has access to information relating to the City's administration of employer-employee relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organiz- ations which represent other employees of the City. The employees designated as confidential employees are as follows: Personnel Analyst Personnel Clerk Benefits Technician Account Technician - Payroll Office Specialist II - Admin Svc Secretary Planning Commission Secretary SECTION 24: Admin Secretary Sr Admin Secretary Risk Management Analyst Deputy City Clerk Records Clerk Records Manager/City Clerk The provisions of this resolution are effective July 1, 1994. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of Jul.y, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Resolution No. 94- P age 10 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly Dassed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of July, 1~g4. Executed this 6th day of July, 1994 at Rancho Cucamonga, California Debra J. Adams, City Clerk BASIC SCHEDULE I -- SALARY CODE TABLE PAY SCHEDULE IN HOURLY, BI-WEEKLY AND MONTHLY ONE HALF PERCENT BETWEEN RANGES MONTHLY AMOUNTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR Resolution AMOUNTS No. 94- Page !1 Range Number 151- 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182. 183. 184. 185. 186. 187. 188. 189. 190. Hourly Rate 4.2439 4.2651 4.2865 4.3079 4.3294 4.3511 4.3728 4.3947 4.4167 4.4388 4.4620 4.4833 4.5057 4.5282 4.5508 4.5736 4.5965 4.6194 4.6425 4.6658 4.7891 4.7125 4.7361 4.7598 4.7836 4.8075 4.8315 4.8557 4.8800 4.9044 4.9289 4.9535 4.9783 5.0032 5.0282 5.0533 5.0786 5.1040 5.1295 5.1552 Bi-Weekly Monthly Ran e Hourly Rate Rate ~r Rate 339.5134 736 191. 5.1809 341.2109 739 192. 5.2069 342.9170 743 193. 5.2329 344.6316 747 194. 5.2591 346.3547 750 195. 5.2853 348.0865 754 196. 5.3118 349.8269 758 197. 5.3383 351.5761 762 198. 5.3650 353.3340 766 199. 5.3919 355.1006 769 200. 5.4188 356.8761 773 201. 5.4459 358.6605 777 202. 5.4731 360.4538 781 203. 5.5005 362.2561 785 204. 5.5280 364.0674 789 205. 5.5556 365.8877 793 206. 5.5834 367.7171 797 207. 5.6113 369.5557 801 208. 5.6394 371.4035 805 209. 5.6676 373.2605 809 210. 5.6959 375.1268 813 211. 5.7244 377.0025 817 212. 5.7530 378.8875 821 213. 5.7818 380.7819 825 214. 5.8107 382.6858 829 215. 5.8398 384.5992 833 216. 5.8690 386.5222 837 217. 5.8983 388.4548 842 218. 5.9278 390.3971 846 219. 5.9574 392.3491 850 220. 5.9872 394.3109 854 221. 6.0172 396.2824 859 222. 6.0472 398.2638 863 223. 6.0775 400.2551 867 224. 6.1079 402.2564 872 225. 6.1384 404.2677 876 226. 6.1691 406.2890 880 227. 6.1999 408.3205 885 228. 6.2309 410.3621 889 229. 6.2521 412.4139 894 230. 6.2934 Bi-Weekly Rate 414.4760 416.5483 418.6311 420.7242 422.8279 424.9420 427.0667 429.2020 431.3481 433.5048 435.6723 437.8507 440.0399 442.2401 444.4513 446.6736 448.9070 451.1515 453.4073 455.6743 457.9527 460.2424 462.5436 464.8564 467.1806 469.5165 471.8641 474.2234 476.5946 478.9775 481.3724 483.7793 486.1982 488.6292 491.0723 493.5277 495.9953 498.4753 500.9677 503.4725 Monthly Rate 898 903 907 912 916 921 925 930 935 939 944 949 953 958 963 968 973 977 982 987 992 997 1002 1007 1012 1017 1022 1027 1033 1038 1043 1048 1053 1059 1064 1069 1075 1080 1085 1091 31 Resolution No. 94- Page 12 Ran e Hourl Rate 231. 6.3249 232. 6.3565 233. 6. 3883 234. 6.4202 235. 6.4523 238. 6. 5496 239. 6.5823 240. 6.6153 Bi -Weekly Rate 505.9899 508.5 198 511.0624 513.6177 516.1858 :7667 3606 523.9674 526. 5872 529.2202 241. 6.6483 531.8663 242. 6.6816 534.5256 243. 6.7150 537.1982 244. 6.7486 539.8842 245. 6.7823 542.5836 246. 6.8162 545.2965 247. 6.8503 548.0230 248. 6.8845 550.7631 249. 6.9190 553.5170 250. 6.9536 556.2845 251. 6.9883 559.0660 252. 7.0233 561.8613 253. 7.0584 564.6706 254. 7.0937 567.4940 255. 7.1291 570.3314 256. 7.1648 573.1831 257. 7.2006 576.0490 258. 7.2366 578.9292 259. 7.2728 581.8239 260. 7.3092 584.7330 261. 7.3457 587.6567 262. 7.3824 590.5950 263. 7.4193 593.5479 264. 7.4564 596.5157 265. 7.4937 599.4982 266. 7.5312 602.4957 267. 7.5689 605.5082 268. 7.6067 608.5358 269. 7.6447 270 7.6830 ~t~[5784 · 6363 271. 7.7214 617.7095 272. 7.7600 620.7981 273. 7.7988 623.9021 274. 7.8378 626. 216 275. 7.8770 630.~567 276. 7.9163 633.3075 277. 7.9559 636.4740 278. 7.9957 639.6564 279. 8.0357 642.8546 280. 8.0759 645.0689 Monthly Rate 1096 1102 1107 1113 1118 1135 1141 1147 1152 1158 1164 1170 1176 1181 1187 1193 1199 1205 1211 1217 1223 1230 1236 1242 1248 1254 1261 1267 1273 1280 1286 1292 1299 1305 1312 1318 1325 1332 1338 1345 1352 1359 1365 1372 1379 1386 1393 1400 Ran e 281. 282. 283. 284. 285. 286. 287. 288. 289. 290. 291. 292. 293. 294. 295. 296. 297. 298. 299. 300. 301. 302. 303. 304. 305. 306. 307. 308. 309. 310. 311. 312. 313. 314. 315. 316. 317. 318. 319. 320. 321. 322. 323. 324. 325. 326. 327. 328. 329. 330. Hourly Rat__e 8.1162 8.1568 8.1976 8.2386 8.2798 8.3212 8.3628 8.4046 8.4466 8.4889 8.5313 8.5740 8.6168 8.6599 8.7032 8.7467 8.7905 8.8344 8.8786 8.9230 8.9676 9.0124 9.0575 9.1028 9.1483 9.1940 9.2400 9.2862 9.3326 9.3793 9.4262 9.4733 9.5207 9.5683 9.6161 9.6642 9.7125 9.7611 9.8099 9.8599 9.9083 9.9578 10.0076 10.0576 10. 1079 10. 1585 10. 2092 10. 2603 10.3116 10. 3632 Bi-Weekly Rate 648.2993 652.5458 655.8085 659.0875 662.3830 665.6949 669.0234 672.3685 675.7303 679.1090 682.5045 685.9170 689.3466 692.7933 696.2573 699.7386 703.2373 706.7535 710.2872 713.8387 717.4079 720.9949 724.5999 728.2229 73 1.8640 735.5233 739.2009 742.8969 746.6114 750.3445 754.0962 757.8667 761.6560 765.4643 769.2916 773.1381 777.0038 780.8888 784.7932 788.7172 792.6608 796.6241 800.6072 804.6103 808.6333 812.6765 816.7399 820.8236 824.9277 829.0523 Monthly Rate 1407 1414 1421 1428 1435 1442 1450 1457 1464 1471 1479 1486 1494 1501 1509 1516 1524 1531 1539 1547 1554 1562 1570 1578 1586 1594 1602 1610 1618 1626 1634 1642 1650 1659 1667 1675 1684 1692 1700 1709 1717 1726 1735 1743 1752 1761 1770 1778 1787 1796 Ran e 331. 332. 333. 334. 335. 336. 337. 338. 339. 340. 341. 342. 343. 344. 345. 346. 347. 348. 349. 350. 351. 352. 353. 354. 355. 356. 357. 358. 359. 360. 361. 362. 363. 364. 365. 366. 367. 368. 369. 370. 371. 372. 373. 374. 375. 376. 377. 378. 379. 380. Hourly Rate 10.4150 10.4670 10.5194 10. 5720 10. 6248 10.6780 10.7314 10. 7850 10.8389 10.8931 10. 9476 11.0023 11.0573 11. 1126 11. 1682 11. 2240 11.2802 11. 3366 11. 3932 11.4502 11.5075 11.5650 11.6228 11.6809 11.7393 11.7980 11.8570 11.9163 11.9759 12.0358 12.0959 12.1564 12.2172 12.2783 12.3397 12.4014 12.4634 12.5257 12.5883 12.6513 12.7145 12.7781 12.8420 12.9062 12.9707 13.0356 13.1008 13.1663 13.2321 13.2983 Bi-Weekly Rate 833.1976 837.3636 841.5504 845.7581 849.9869 854.2369 858.5080 862.8006 867.1146 871.4502 875.8074 880.1864 884.5874 889.0103 893.4554 897.9226 902.4123 906.9243 911.4589 916.0162 920.5963 925.1993 929.8253 934.4744 939.1468 943.8425 948.5617 953.3045 958.07ll 962.8614 967.6757 972.5141 977.3767 982.2636 987.1749 992.1108 997.0713 1002.0567 1007.0669 1012.1023 1017.1628 1022.2486 1027.3598 1032.4966 1037.6591 1042.8474 1048.0617 1053.3020 1058.5685 1063.8613 Monthly Rate 1805 1814 1823 1832 1842 1851 1860 1869 1879 1888 1898 1907 1917 1926 1936 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2076 2086 2097 2107 2118 2128 2139 2150 2182 2193 2204 2215 2226 2237 2248 2260 2271 2282 2294 2305 Ran e 381. 382. 383. 384. 385. 386. 387. 388. 389. 390. 391. 392. 393. 394. 395. 396. 397. 398. 399. 400. 401. 402. 403. 404. 405. 406. 407. 408. 409. 410. 411. 412. 413. 414. 415. 416. 417. 418. 419. 420. 421. 422. 423. 424. 425. 426. 427. 428. 429. 430. Hourly Rate 13. 3648 13.4316 13.4987 13. 5662 13.6341 13.7022 13. 7707 13.8396 13. 9088 13.9783 14.0482 14. 1185 14.1891 14. 2600 14.3313 14.4030 14.4750 14.5474 14.6201 14.6932 14.7667 14.8405 14.9147 14.9893 15.0642 15.1395 15.2152 15.2913 15.3678 15.4446 15.5218 15.5994 15.6774 15.7558 15.8346 15.9138 15.9933 16.0733 16.1537 16.2344 16.3156 16.3972 16.4792 16.5616 16.6444 16.7276 16.8112 16.8953 16.9798 17.0647 Resolution No. 94- Page 13 Bi-Weekly Monthly ~.ate ~ate 1069.1806 2317 1074.5265 2328 1079.8992 2340 1085.2987 2351 1090.7252 2363 1096.1788 2375 1101.6597 2387 1107.1680 2399 1112.7038 2411 1118.2673 2423 1123.8587 2435 1129.4780 2447 1135.1254 2459 1140.8010 2472 1146.5050 2484 1152.2375 2497 1157.9987 2509 1163.7887 2522 1169.6076 2534 1175.4557 2547 1181.3329 2560 1187.2396 2572 1193.1758 2585 1199.1417 2598 1205.1374 2611 1211.1631 2624 1217.2189 2637 1223.3050 2650 1229.4215 2664 1235.5686 2677 1241.7465 2690 1247.9552 2704 1254.1950 2717 1260.4660 2731 1266.7683 2745 1273.1021 2758 1279.4676 2772 1285.8650 2786 1292.2943 2800 1298.7558 2814 1305.2496 2828 1311.7758 2842 1318.3347 2856 1324.9264 2871 1331.5510 2885 1338.2087 2899 1344.8998 2914 1351.6243 2929 1358.3824 2943 1365.1743 2958 Resolution No. 94- Page 14 Ran · Hourly Bi-Weekly ~r Mate Mate 431. 17.1500 1372.0002 432. 17.2358 1378.8602 433. 17.3219 1385.7545 434. 17.4085 1392.6833 435. 17.4956 1399.6467 436. 17.5831 14 6.6449 437. 17.6710 14~3.6781 438. 17.7593 1420.7465 439. 17.8481 1427.8503 440. 17.9374 1434.9895 441. 18.0271 1442.1645 442. 18.1172 1449.3753 443. 18.2078 1456.6222 444. 18.2988 1463.9053 445. 18.3903 1471.2248 446. 18.4823 1478.5809 447. 18.5747 1485.9738 448. 18.6577 1493.4037 449. 18.7609 1500.8707 450. 18.8547 1508.3751 451. 18.9490 1515.9169 452. 19.0437 1523.4965 453. 19.1389 1531.1140 454. 19.2346 1538.7696 455. 19.3308 1546.4634 456. 19.4274 1554.1957 457. 19.5246 1561.9667 458. 19.6222 1569.7766 459. 19.7203 1577.6254 460. 19.8189 1585.5136 461. 19.9180 1593.4411 462. 20.0176 1601.4083 463. 20.1177 1609.4154 464. 20.2183 1617.4625 465. 20.3194 1625.5498 466. 20.4210 1633.6775 467. 20.5231 1641.8459 468. 20.6257 1650.0551 469. 20.7288 1658.3054 470. 20.8325 1666.5969 471. 20.9366 1674.9299 473. 474. 21.2522 1700.1797 475. 21.3585 1708.6806 476. 21.4653 1717.2240 477. 21.5726 1725.8101 478. ~)[6805 1734. 480. 21.8978 1751.8269 Monthly Rate 2973 2988 3002 3017 3033 3048 3063 3078 3094 3109 3125 3140 3156 3172 3188 3204 3220 3236 3252 3268 3284 3301 3317 3334 3351 3367 3384 3401 3418 3435 3452 3470 3487 3505 3522 3540 3557 3575 3593 3611 3629 3647 3665 3684 3702 3721 3739 3758 3777 3796 Ran e 481. 482. 483. 484. 485. 486. 487. 488. 489. 490. 491. 492. 493. 494. 495. 496. 497. 498. 4gg. 5O0. 501. 502. 503. 504. 505. 506. 507. 508. 509. 510. 511. 512. 513. 514. 515. 516. 517. 518. 519. 520. 521. 522. 523. 524. 525. 526. 527. 528. 529. 530. Hourly Rate 22.0073 22.1174 22.2279 22.3391 22.4508 22.5630 22.6759 22.7892 22.9032 23.0177 23.1328 23.2484 23.3647 23.4815 23.5989 23.7169 23.8355 23.9547 24.0745 24.1948 24.3158 24.4374 24.5596 24.6824 24.8058 24.9298 25.0545 25.1797 25.3056 25.4321 25.5593 25.6871 25.8155 25.9446 26.0743 26.2047 26.3357 26.4674 26.5998 26.7328 26.8664 27.0007 27.1358 27.2714 27.4078 27.5448 27.6826 27.8210 27.9601 28.0999 Bi-Weekly Rate 1760.5861 1769.3890 1778.2359 1787.1271 1796.0627 1805.0431 1814.0683 1823.1386 1832.2543 1841.4156 1850.6227 1859.8758 1869.1752 1878.5210 1887.9136 1897.3532 1906.8400 1916.3742 1925.9560 1935.5858 1945.2637 1954.9901 1964.7650 1974.5888 1984.4618 1994.3841 2004.3560 2014.3778 2024.4497 2034.5719 2044.7448 2054.9685 1065.2434 2075.5696 2085.9474 2096. 3772 2106.8590 2117.3933 2127.9803 2138.6202 2149.3133 2160.0599 2170.8602 2181.7145 2192.6230 2203.5862 2214.6041 2225.6771 2236.8055 2247.9895 Monthly Rate 3815 3834 3853 3872 3891 3911 3930 3950 3970 3990 4010 4030 4050 4070 4090 4111 4131 4152 4173 4194 4215 4236 4257 4278 4300 4321 4343 4364 4386 4408 4430 4452 4475 4497 4520 4542 4565 4588 4611 4634 4657 4680 4704 4727 4751 4774 4798 4822 4846 4871 Ran e 531. 532. 533. 536. 537. 538. 539. 54O. 541. 542. 543. 544. 545. 546. 547. 548. 549. 550. 551. 554. 555. 556. 557. 558. 559. 56O. 561. 562. 563. 564. 565. 566. 567. 568. 569. 570. 571. 572. 573. 574. 575. 576. 577. 578. 579. 580. Hourly Rate 28.2404 28.3816 28.5235, [6661 8094 28.9535 29.0982 29.2437 29.3900 29.5369 29.6846 29.8330 29.9822 30.1321 30.2827 30.4342 30.5863 30.7393 30.8930 31.0474 31.2027 31.3587 31.5155 31.6730 31.8314 31.9906 32.1505 32.3113 32.4728 32.6352 32.7984 32.9624 33.1272 33.2928 33.4593 33.6266 33.7947 33.9637 34.1335 34.3042 34.4757 34.6481 34.8213 34.9954 35.1704 35.3462 35.5230 35.7006 35.8791 36.0585 Bi-Weekly Rate 2259.2295 2270.5256 2281.8783 2293. ~0~.~ 2316.2779 2327.8592 2339.4985 2351.1960 2362.9520 2374.7668 2386.6406 2398.5738 2410.5667 2422.6195 2434.7326 2446.9063 2459.1408 2471.4365 2483.7937 2496.2127 2508.6937 2521.2372 2533.8434 2546.5126 2559.2452 2572.0414 2584.9016 2597.8261 2610.8152 2623.8693 2626.9886 2650.1736 2663.4245 2676.7416 2690.1253 2703.5759 2717.0938 2730.6793 2744.3327 2758.0543 2771.8446 2785.7038 2799.6323 2813.6305 2827.6987 2841.8371 2856.0463 2870.3266 2884.6782 Monthly Rate 4895 4919 4944 4969 4994 5019 5044 5069 5094 5120 5145 5171 5197 5223 5249 5275 5302 5328 5355 5382 54O8 5436 5463 5490 5517 5545 5573 5601 5629 5657 5685 5713 5742 5771 5800 5829 5858 5887 5916 5946 5976 6006 6036 6066 6096 6127 6157 6188 6219 6250 Resolution No. 94- Page !5 Ran e Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly ~q~eer Rate Rate Rate 581. 582. 583. 584. 585. 586. 587. 588. 589. 590. 591. 592. 593. 594. 595. 596. 597. 598. 599. 600. 601. 602. 603. 604. 605. 606. 607. 608. 609. 610. 611. 612. 613. 614. 615. 616. 617. 618. 619. 620. 36.2388 36.4200 36.6021 36.7851 36.9690 37.1538 37.3396 37.5263 37.7139 37.9025 38.0920 38.2825 38.4739 38.6663 38.8596 39.0539 39.2492 39.4454 39.6426 39.8409 40.040 1 40.24 3 40.44~5 40.6437 40.8469 41.0512 41. 2564 41.4627 41.6700 41.8784 42.0878 42. 2982 42. 5097 42.7222 42. 9358 43. 1505 43. 3663 43.5831 43.8010 44.0200 44.240 44.461 44.683 44.906 45.131 45.357 45.584 45.812 46.041 46.271 621. 622. 623. 624. 625. 626. 627. 628. 629. 630. 2899.1016 6281 2913.5971 6313 2928.1651 6344 2942.8059 6376 2957.5199 6408 2972.3075 6440 2987.1691 6472 3002.1049 6505 3017.1154 6537 3032.2010 6570 3047.3620 6603 3062.5988 6636 3077.9118 6669 3093.3014 6702 3108.7679 6736 3124.3117 6769 3139.9333 6803 3155.6330 6837 3171.4111 6871 3187.2682 6906 3203.2045 6941 3219.2206 6976 3235.3167 7011 3251.4932 7046 3267.7507 7081 3284.0895 7117 3300.5100 7152 3317.0125 7188 3333.5975 7224 3350.2655 7260 3367.0168 7296 3383.8519 7333 3400.7712 7370 3417.7750 7407 3434.8639 7444 3452.0382 748! 3469.2984 7518 3486.6449 7556 3504.0781 7594 3521.5985 7632 3539.206 7670 3556.902 7709 3574.687 7747 3592.560 7786 3610.523 7825 3628.576 7864 3646.719 7903 3664.953 7943 3683.278 7983 3701.694 8023 Resolution No. 94- Page 16 Range Hourly Bi-Weekly Number Rate Rate 631. 46.502 3720.202 632. 46.735 3738.803 633. 46.969 3757.497 634. 47.204 3776.284 635. 47.440 3795.165 636. 47.677 3814.141 637. 47.915 3833.212 638. 48.155 3852.378 639. 48.396 3871.640 640. 48.638 3890.998 641. 48.881 642. 49.125 643. 49.371 644. 49.618 645. 49.866 646. 50.115 647. 50.366 648. 50.618 649. 50.871 650. 51.125 3910.453 3930.005 3949.655 3969.403 3989.250 4009.196 4029.242 4049.388 4069.635 4089.983 Monthly Rate 8063 8103 8144 8184 8225 8267 8308 8349 8391 8433 8475 8518 8560 8603 8646 8689 8733 8776 8820 8864 651. 51.381 4110.433 8908 652. 51.638 4130.985 8952 653. 51.896 4151.640 8996 654. 52.155 4172.400 9040 655. 52.420 4193.262 9085 656. 52.683 4214.230 9130 657. 52.943 4235.301 9175 658. 53.208 4256.478 9220 659. 53.474 4277.760 9266 660. 53.741 4299.150 9312 661. 54.010 4320.646 662. 54.280 4342.249 663. 54.551 4363.g06 664. 54.824 4385.780 665. 55.098 4407.709 666. 55.373 4429.748 667. 55.650 4451.897 668. 55.928 4474.156 669. 56.208 4496.527 670. 56.489 4519.010 9359 9406 9453 9500 9548 9596 9644 9692 9740 9789 Range Number 671. 672. 673. 674. 675. 676. 677. 678. 679. 680. 681. 682. 683. 684. 685. 686. 687. 688. 689. 690. 691. 692. 693. 694. 695. 696. 697. 698. 699. 700. Hourly Rate 56.771 57.055 57.340 57.627 57.915 58.205 58.496 58.788 59.082 59.377 59.674 59.972 60.272 60.573 60.876 61.180 61.486 61.793 62.102 62.413 62.725 63.039 63.354 63.671 63.989 64.309 64.631 64.954 65.279 65.605 Bi-Weekly Rate 4541.605 4564.313 4587.135 4610.071 4633.121 4656.287 4679.568 4702.966 4726.481 4750.113 4773.864 4797.733 4821.722 4845.831 4870.060 4894.410 4918.881 4943.476 4968.193 4993.034 5017.999 5043.089 5068.304 5093.646 5119.114 5144.710 5170.434 5196.286 5222.267 5248.378 Monthly Rate 9838 9887 9936 9986 10,036 10,086 10,137 10,188 10,239 10,290 10,341 10,393 10,445 10,497 10,550 10,603 10,656 10,709 10,763 10,816 10,870 10,925 10,979 11,034 11,090 11,145 11,201 11,257 11,313 11,370 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager APPROVAL TO AMEND RESOLUTION 93-062 PROVIDING FOR CHARGES FOR PARKING AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPORTS COMPLEX RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Resolution 93-062 be amended to provide that parking lot fees for baseball games may be charged an amount not to exceed $2.00 and other events may be charged-a sum not to exceed $4.00. The parking lot fee would apply to baseball games and events held at the Adult Sports Complex for which an admission fee is charged. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: A parking lot fee of $2.00 is currently charged for all events at the Adult Sports Complex where an admission fee is charged. Valley Baseball Club has requested that the parking lot fee for the July 30, 1994 Beach Boys Concert be increased to $3.00. Staff has surveyed stadium and special event facilities and finds that the proposed parking lot fee for events is within the range of parking lot fees charged by nearby facilities: Anaheim Stadium Adelanto Mavericks Stadium Glen Helen Blockbuster Pavilion Lake Elsinore Storm Stadium Pomona Fairplex $5.00 No Fee $5.00 $2.00 baseball; $4.00 concert events $5.00 SUMMARY: Staff recommends that the City Council consider the proposed resolution which would allow for parking lot fees of a maximum of $2.00 for baseball games and a sum not to exceed $4.00 for other events held at the Adult Sports Complex for which an admission fee is charged. ~/~:~n..Xota, community services Manager SO/kls Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 94-~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 93-062 AND ESTABLISHING A NEW PARKING FEE SCHEDULE FOR PARKING AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPORTS COMPLEX DURING EVENTS FOR WHICH ADMISSION IS CHARGED The Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Subject to the exceptions specified in paragraph three hereof, any person or persons who conduct an event for which an admission fee is charged at the Rancho Cucamonga Sports Complex located on the west and east side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard ("the Sports Complex" hereinafter) may charge the following parking fees for the use of parking lot areas at said Sports Complex delineated by letter on Exhibit "1" hereto: A. For baseball and related games, a sum not to exceed $2.00 per vehicle. vehicle. B. For other events, a sum not to exceed $4.00 per The amount of the parking fee shall be subject to City administrative review and approval. 2. The parking fee referred to in paragraph one of this Resolution may be charged to any vehicle entering the Sports Complex during that period of time beginning two hours prior to the scheduled time for the commencement of the event and concluding when the event concludes. 3. The parking fee referred to in paragraphs one and two hereof shall not apply to and shall not be levied against the following vehicles: A. Vehicles entitled to occupy the preferred parking area delineated in the Lease dated September 16, 1992 by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC., and designated by the letter "A" on Exhibit "1" hereto during baseball games conducted at the Stadium pursuant to said Lease; or B. Vehicles used by persons attending other events simultaneously occurring at the Sports Complex which display a parking permit therefore issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, provided that no such vehicle shall be permitted to occupy space in the above-reference preferred parking area for a period of time two hours before and through the conclusion of a baseball game conducted pursuant to the above-referenced Lease. Resolution No. 94- Page 2 C. Vehicles used by persons who have business at the Animal Care facility and who park in the short-term parking area designated by the City for Animal Care patrons. 4. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to implement technical parking operations and procedures as required to insure the efficient flow of public parking for the Sports Complex. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 1994. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of July, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 6th day of July, 1994. Executed this Cucamonga, California. 7th day of July, 1994, at Rancho Debra J. Adams, City Clerk ---. Arrow Highway Adult Sports Com, .x Stadium &Park ~_ __ ,,~Lo . _B_Ou evar ...... -5-,,,,,u,, a , . , ,,J; ,. ~:~~. , ~* L ~ .' "~ ' ~ ...,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,-~ ~ ~ 'il ' """"""' """'IIIIIIIIIUUI~III~~ ~~~ f~ , ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.~~'Z"""""""""""" ~T: i': i F ' ] ' ~ """'~""',,,,,.,,,,,,,,,...,,,.,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Deborah Clark, Library Manager Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner APPROVALTO ACCEPT THE GRANT DEED FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE LIBRARY PROPERTY, APN 208-011-58, LOCATED AT 9191 BASELINE ROAD. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council approve the attached resolution accepting the Grant Deed from the County of San Bernardino for the Library property, APN 208-011-58, located at 9191 Baseline Road and authorize the City Engineer to sign the Grant Deed. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As defined in the Transition Agreement which went before the City Council on June 15, 1994, the Library property located at 9191 Baseline Road is now officially being deeded to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. e ec u ly~su mi ed, e orah Cl Library Manager Attachments RESOLdION NO. / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE LIBRARY PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9191 BASELINE ROAD, APN 208-011-58, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN SAID DEED WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino is offering a property located at 9191 Baseline Road, APN 208-011-58; and WHEREAS, this property is being accepted in fee title by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Community Facility purposes. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby accept the property located at 9191 Baseline Road and authorizes the City Engineer to sign the Grant Deed. : ;. ; Tract NO. 3573, M.B. Por. Cucornongo Vineyard Troct, Sub.'C' M.~ 2,/67 Roncho Cucomongo City Tox eote ,4rio f5012 k AVENUE-.---2- 4. '-._L_,_. Book 208 PoOe OI Son 8ernorfiano County DATE:. TO: FROM: BY: SUBjECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Councfi Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITH NO INCREASE RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). There is no increase from the current tax rate for developed properties from Fiscal Year 93/94 rates. Special Tax A - Drainage l~acilities Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.) lI (3077-3589 S.F.) III (2564-3076 S.F.) IV (2308-2563 S.F.) V (2051-2307 S.F.) Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) Undeveloped Property $944 $699 $524 $420 $349 $245 $1,526/acre Special Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Tax B - Law Enforcement I (3590 + S.F) II (3077-3587 S.F.) III (2564-3076 S.F.) IV (2308-2563 S.F.} V (2051-2307 S.F.) VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) $1.00 $1.oo $1.oo $1 .oo $ .oo $1.oo BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21, 1989, the City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District No. 88-2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to finance drainage facfiities, police operations and maintenance costs. _/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT C.F.D. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LA~V ENFORCEMENT} July 6. 1994 Page 2 The special tax being levied annually for the drainage facilities are in Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities. On April 7, 1994, City Council approved Resolution No. 94-058, authorizing the issuance of bonds. The collections from the annual levy will be used to pay debt service through the life of the bonds. The levy of special taxes annually for the Law Enforcement services are listed in Special Tax B - Law Enforcement. When the collections are received by the City, the funds are transferred to the General Fund to offset the Law Enforcement costs. Respectfull submitted, z Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map RESOLIYrION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, {hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualffied electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facfiities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facfiities Act of 1982', being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) {hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facfiities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, 1T IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SF.C'VION 2: That the specific rate and mount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 1993/94 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A'. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SF-CYION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A, Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION C.F.D. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT} July 6, 1994 Page 2 SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SF. CTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SF-CTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detafied report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: day of , 1994. NOES: ABSENT: A'I'fEST: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk 47 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACEITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 EXHIBIT 'A' The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apporLlonment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 1994/95. SPECIAL TAX "A" - DRAINAGE FACILITIES PROPERTY CATEGORIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", which are identified as follows: DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessors's parcel for which property a bufiding permit has been issued as of May 31 of any year. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A:, is: {i) owned by a public entity; (ii} owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (ill) zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAX 'A' RATFJ The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax "A" rates for Fiscal Year 1994/95 are as follows: Taxing Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $944 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area} * B. Residential II $699 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential III $524 per year (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area} * D. Residential Class IV $420 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area} * Taxlnq Classtfic~tion Tax Rate Residential Class V (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * $349 per year Residential Class VI (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * $245 per year C~ Commercial or industrial property $2,030 per acre per year ** 2. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property $1,526 per acre per year *** The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the bufiding pennit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage exclusive d any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX Special Tax 'A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax "A" revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of authorized public facilities, which may include, without limitation, payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness; funding of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public facilities or debt service; or direct payment for public facilities (CFD Expenses"}. The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses which must be paid for from Special Tax 'A" revenues collected during the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax 'A" levy is to be established (the '~equired Special Tax "A' Revenue"). STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate, not to exceed 91% of the maximum authorized Special Tax 'A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classfficatlons necessary to generate Special Tax "A" revenue in the Fiscal Year of the levy equal to the Required Special Tax 'A' Revenue for such Fiscal Year shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A' revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A' rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Undeveloped Property. STEP 4: STEP 5: If additional Special Tax 'A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax 'A' Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax 'A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax 'A" revenue shah be levied on all Developed Property. If additional Special Tax 'A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A' Revenue, the Community Facilities District shaH: Compare {l) the Special Tax 'A" rate which would be levied on each Developed Property combimng STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (H) the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A". The Base Maximum Special Tax 'A' means an amount equal to $0,054 per square foot of the lot or parcel. If the product described in |ii) above exceeds the Special Tax "A' rate described in (i) above for any Developed Property, the Community Facfiities District shall increase the Special Tax "A' rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (ii) above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues. SPECIAL TAX '~" - LAW ENFORCEMENT All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax '~". The authorized Special Tax '~" rates for Fiscal Year 1994-1995 are as follows: Taxin~ Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $1.00 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * B. Residential Class H $1.00 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential Class HI $1.00 per year (2,564-3,076 squar~ feet of dwelling unit living area) * D. Residential Class IV $1.00 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * E. Residential Class V $1.00 per year (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * F. Residential Class VI $1.00 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * G. Commercial or industrial property $1,000 per acre per year ** DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will tam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector APPROVAL TO REJECT ALL BIDS FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET PROJECT RECOIIIElil)ATION It is recommended that the City Council re.tect all bids, without prejudice, for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Eighth Street Project, as being non-responsive to the needs of the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Pursuant to previous Council action, bids were solicited, recetveH and opened on May 17, 1994, for the subject project. Staff has reviewed the bids and found that the bids received did not meet the requirements requiring 1~ subcontractor participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises/Women Business Enterprises as required by the Federal provisions of the documents. Therefore, it is reconmnended that all bids be rejected. Staff reconmnends that the project be re-bid immediately. Legal advertising would appear on Tuesday, July 12 and Tuesday, July 19 with bids to be opened at ?:00 PM on Tuesday, August 2, 1994. Respectful ly subml tted, <~,W O'Netl City Engineer WjO:MDL:sd Y DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J.ly 6, 991 STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack-Lam, AICP, City Manager~ Will jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer James T. Harris, Associate Engineer APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, STATE AGREEMENT NO. 8-786 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS, SAFETY LIGHTING AND ROADWORK ON ROUTE 66 AT BAKER AVENUE RECO~NOATION It is hereb recon~nended that the City Council approve and execute the Cooperative % reement, State A reement No. 8-786, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga an2 the State of ~galifornta for the design and construction of traffic control si nal s, safety lightin and roadwork on Route 66 at Baker Avenue and a certi?ted copy of said Resolution along with the executed coOies B~G~ND/~YSIS This Cooperative Agreement provides for the design and construction of a traffic signal with safety 1 ightin and minor roadwo~ at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard (Route 66} and Baker Avenue. The costs are oroportione~ as follows: State - t~ thirds and City - one third. The aqre~ent also . Maintenance costs are proportioned as follows: State - t~ thirds an~ City - one third. The a reement sets the State's portion at $79,8~.00 and the Cit's 2oftion at $39,980.00 with the provision to increase the State's and ~ty s oortion s~ould ~e need arise. Funding for the City's share shall be from TDA Article 8, kcoun~' No. 12-4637-930S. Original copies of the subject Cooperative Agreement are available in the City C1 erk' s office. Re s p ec tful 1 y s u)t tted, l~vWill Jam J. O'Netl City Engineer WjO:JH:al r Attachment Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAJ~CHO CUCA~4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, STATE AX~REB4ENT NO. 8-786, FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS, SAFETY LIGHTING AND ROADWORK ON ROUTE 66 AT BAKER STREET WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "City"), has for its consideration and execution, the Cooperative Agreement - State Agreement No. 8-786 for the design and construction traffic.control signals, safety, lighting and roadwork on Route 66 at Baker Avenue; and WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Transportation, District Office 8 (hereinafter referred to as "State") processes and monitors State funded projects; and WHEREAS, as a condition to payment of State funds for said project, the Local Agency shall approve and execute said Cooperative Agreement No. 8- 786. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Authorize the Execution of City - State Agreement No. 8-786 for the design and construction of traffic control signals, safety lighting and roadwork on Route 66 at Baker Avenue. To authorize the mayor to sign said Agreement and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution, as well as type in the Resolution nu~er and date in the blank of the third block of said supplement and for the return of the original copies of said supplement to the State of California Department of Transportation along with the certified copy of this resolution. DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBjECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, ZONE 1, COMMON USE AGREEMENT NO. FA 19006 FOR CROSSINGS OF SAN SEVAINE CREEK AT SU~4IT AVENUE, HENDERSON CHANNEL AT SAN SEVAINE ROAD AND WARDMAN CHANNEL AT COLONBERG ROAD RECONqE)IDATION It is recomended that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. BACKGROUIE/ANALYSI S San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) is requesting approval by the City of a "Common Use Agreement" for the three channel crossings shown on Exhibit "A". Since SBCFCD owns the land on which the City desires to operate and maintain the crossings and appurtenances, an "Areas of Common Use" agreement is required. The agreement states that SBCFCD will preserve, maintain and operate the flood control and water conservation works and the City will operate and maintain the street crossings and appurtenances within the areas of Common Use. The Agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectful ly submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WjO:BRH:dlw Attachments Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIN~,RRING DIVISION ~/..p$4 T/pAl/'Pl,~. t:' DATE: T~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: SUBJECT: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO CONDUCT AN UPDATE APPRAISAL OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a professional services agreement for an amount not to exceed $8,000 to perform an update appraisal of Assessment District 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). This agreement is to be funded entirely by the property owner and will not affect the general fund. BACKGROUND When bonds were sold to acquire facilities in this District, the value of the District at that time was not sufficient to meet the 4:1 value to lien ratio required by the City. Although the value of the land in the District was enough to support the majority of the bonded indebtedness, there was a small portion remaining that could not be funded. Rather go through the expense of issuing a second series of bonds for a relatively small amount, it was decided to issue all of the bonds necessary and to hold the portion that could not be supported in escrow. At the time of this decision, the second phase of Foothill Marketplace was already under construction and the element of risk to the District was considered to be very small. In addition, should a catastrophe occur, then the funds in escrow would be used to buy down the other existing bonds thus there was no risk to the City. Now that construction in the District has reached its current point, it is our feeling that the value of the District can support the bond proceeds held in escrow. Before we can release these funds, an updated appraisal must be conducted. The cost of this appraisal is being paid for by the property owner. The cost of this appraisal will not have an impact on the general fund. For these reasons, staff is recommending approval of this professional services agreement. Respectfully Submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: July 6, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT Will jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-11, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND THE A.T.& S.F. RAILROAD SPUR TRACK WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY BHP STEEL USA, INCORPORATED RECOIk~(NDATION It i s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACXGROUND/AJ~ALYSIS Conditional Use Permit 94-11, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad spur track west of Mill iken Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on April ?7, lqa4, to construct a 93,500 square foot addition, in excess of 77 feet in height, to connect two existing industrial bull dings in the General Industrial Designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The Developer, BHP Steel USA, Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $20,750.00 Labor and Material Bond: $10,375.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectful 1 y subrot tted, Will Jam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:jAD:dl w Y RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-11 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement submitted by BHP Steel USA, Incorporated, Developer, for the improvement of public right- of-way generally located on the north side of Arrow Route west of the A T.& S.F. rail road spur track; and ' WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, Conditional Use Permit No. 94-11; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Securities be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of ~ancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PROJECT 51TE' "'- .,,~t,-~ CtJP ARRO!,I R0UTF, ,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (~ : STATE OF CALIFORNIA N."r.S. 59 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July.6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 14121, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY K. HOVNANIAN COMPANIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA II, INC., AND RELEASE OF PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND CASH MONUMENTATION DEPOSIT ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 20, 1991, FROM RHOADES/SAN JUAN, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECOe4ENDATIOII It is reconmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the new Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit, releasing the previous Improvement Agreement and Securities and authorizing the Finance Department to refund the previous Monumentation Cash Deposit, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and release said agreements. BjN~KGROIJ !Ii3//lUN.N. Y S I S The map, Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 14121, located at the southwest corner of Mil liken and Highland Avenues were approved by City Council on December 6, 1989. The original Tract Map and the Amending Map were recorded on December 15, 1989 and June 19, 1990 respectively. The property has been purchased by K. Hovnanian Companies of Southern Cali fornia I I, Inc., who has submitted an agreement and securities to guarantee the completion of tl~e public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $459,800.00 Labor and Material Bond: $229,900.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit: $ 4,750.00 The above mentioned securities shall replace the securities submitted by the previous developer, Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership, and accepted by City Council on Febfury 20, 1991. It should be noted that, the Y CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 14121 July 6, 1994 Page 2 submitted bond amounts have been reduced by aPDroximatel y 34% from the original bond estimate due to the completion of the Mill iken Avenue median improvements. By processing this agreement, K. Hovnanian Companie~ o~ Southern Californta II, Inc., as the new Developer, will now have the responsibil ity for completion of the project. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectful 1 y submitted, ~ill Jam J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:dl w Attachments 61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECU RI TIES, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 14121 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 20, 1991 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, did consider an Improvement Agreement, related Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit, submitted by K. Hovnanian Companies of Southern California II, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Milliken and Highland Avenues and release of the previously approved Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA. MONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that ( 1 ) said Improvement Agreement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by K. Hovnanian Companies of Southern Cal i fornia I I, Inc., are hereby approved, (2) the previously approved Improvement Agreement, Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit from Rhoades/San Juan, A California Limited Partnership are released and (3) the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. I gkl'lll m'A mew,r---. f* · | , m · , .%'m. ,t,~, \ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~'NGINEERIZNG DIVISION ~ T/(' 14 12 I N DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer RELEASE OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND BONDS ACCEPTED PROM THE CARYN COMPANY PER RESOLUTION 89-452, FOR WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD (A.K.A. LOWER LOOP ROAD) FOR TRACT 13566-1 AND -3, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET AND WEST OP CHERRY AVENUE RECOIIENDATIOI It is recommended that the City Council authorize staff to release Bond No. 9850655, accepted from The Caryn Company for Wardman Bull ock Road (a.k.a. Lower Loop Road) for Tract 13566-1 and -3. BACXGIIOUND/AJIALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 13566-1 an~ -3, located south of 24th Street and west of Cher~ Avenue, the developer was required to complete Wardman Bullock Road (a.k.a. Lower Loop Road) across San Sevaine Basin. The applicant has formed an Assessment District (CFD 88-2) to complete certain infrastructure associated with this tract, including the completion of Wardman Bullock Road. The appl lcant has deposited with the City an amount of money equal to the bond from the proceeds of bond CPD ~8-2 meeting his obligation of the condition of approval. Respectfull y subrot tted, dWllliamJ O'Netl City Engineer WJO:LRB:dlw Y TRACT 13566 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect~ ~ APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14407 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES RECOIIENOATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14407 were approved by the City Council on May 7, 1992, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $205,000 Labor and Material Bond: $102,500 The developer, Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement in order to schedule and complete the final lift of asphal t paving and the required landscape. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~p-rv~William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:ly Attachments Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain Avenue / PO. Box 670/Upland. California 91785-0670 909/985-0971 FAX: 909/949-6700 June 9, 1994 Mr. Steve Gilliland Community Development Dept. Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION - TRACT 14407 Dear Steve: Enclosed please find our request for extension of the subject agreement along with a check in the amount of $251.00 to cover the fee. We are requesting a six month extension to complete construction of this project. Thank you for considering this request and for your assistance. I apologize for any delay or inconvenience caused by my forgetting the proper procedure. Sincerely, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. Maxine Bignell Project Development emb\RCext enclosures A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14407 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on July 6, 1994, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the south west corner of Base Line Road and Mountain View Drive; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14407; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 6, Mayor, and Members Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT of the City Council William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector. , APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR ELM AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED ON ELM AVENUE WEST BEll~EEN CHURCH STREET AND SPRUCE AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES RECI31dENDATION It is recon~nended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUNI)/A~IAI, YSI S Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Elm Avenue Improvements were approved by the City Council on March 3, 1988, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $53,600. Labor and Material Bond: $26,800. The developer, Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement in order to schedule and complete the final lift of asphalt paving. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, <~--~W O'Neil City Engineer WjO:SMG: ly Attachments Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 / Upland. California 91785-0670 909/985-0971 FAX: 909/949-6700 June 9, 1994 Mr. Steve Gilliland Community Development Dept. Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION - ELM AVENUE BETWEEN SPRUCE AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET Dear Steve: Enclosed please find our request for extension of the subject agreement along with a check in the amount of $251.00 to cover the fee. We are requesting a six month extension to complete construction of this project. Thank you for considering this request and for your assistance. I apologize for any delay or inconvenience caused by my forgetting the proper procedure. Sincerely, ~EEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT CORP. .," :2-,'/ /- &_,? Maxine Bignell Project Development emb\RCext enclosures ........... T .........I' l"' "r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR ELM AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on July 6, 1994, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on Elm Avenue west between Church Street and Spruce Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Elm Avenue Improvements; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 71 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT JUly 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Dan C~leman, Principal Planner CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - Review of a development agreement for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26- The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Development Agreement. MALYSIS The applications for a Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment were reviewed and approved by the City Council on June 1 and 15, 1994. The Development Agreement was negotiated and prepared concurrently with these planning documents in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding adopted by the City Council in October of 1993. The Metrolink Acquisition Agreement, which was approved by the City Council on May 18, 1994, included this Development Agreement as an attachment. The Metrolink Acquisition Agreement states that the City shall approve this Development Agreement in "substantially the same form" as attached. For a complete description of the deal points in this Development Agreement, please refer to the attached copies of the Planning Commission's Staff Report and Minutes. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DA 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS July 6, 1994 Page 2 ENVI~NM~T~ ~S~SMENT An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan land use amendments and this Agreement. The City Council reviewed and certified the EIR on June 1, 1994. Resp t[u y submittS, Ri mez .\ C Director R~:DC:sp Aztachments: Exhibit "A" - May 25, 1994 Planning Co~nission staff report Exhibit "B" - May 25, 1994 Planning Comission minutes Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-39 Ordinance 73 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 25~ 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Con:nission Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Dan Coleman, Principal Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - Review of a development agreement for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. BACKGROUND: On October 6, 1993, the City Council approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with General Dynamics regarding the development and processing of plans for the General Dynamics property. The City and applicant agreed to negotiate a Development Agreement which would vest zoning pursuant to a Specific Plan, define environmental mitigation associated with project implementation, set forth timing for processing subsequent approvals, and establish the parties' on-going cooperation- The applications for a Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment, Industrial Specific Plan Amendment, and Environmental Impact Report were reviewed and approved by the Planning Co~nission on April 27, 1994 and are scheduled for City Council action in June of this year. The Development Agreement was negotiated and prepared concurrently with these planning documents. The acquisition agreement for the Metrolink Station, scheduled for Council action on May 18, 1994, states that the City shall approve this Development Agreement in "substantially the same form" as attached. ANALYSIS: State law allows cities to enter into agreements with developers to provide greater certainty in the approval of development projects, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic risk associated with development. The key points of this agreement, which achieve these goals, are as follows: A. Term of Agreement - 20 years. Land Use Entitlements - Gives developer "vesting" rights to develop property pursuant to Specific Plan approved by City, which means the land use regulations and development standards of the Specific Plan cannot be changed without mutual consent for 20 years- An individual development project is vested for 5 years once approved. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS May 25, 1994 Page 2 Ce Fees - City agrees that beautification fees and transportation development fees are fixed at their current level for a period of 5 years (see Exhibit "D" of Agreement). These fees are also fixed for 5 years once a development plan is approved. Further, these fees shall not be charged against the golf course. Processing fees are not affected, such as Conditional Use Permits, Development Reviews, subdivisions, etc. Construction Period - Developer agrees to pull permits to build golf course within 1 year of final parcel map recordation and complete course within 2 years after grading and building permits are issued. Infrastructure Phasing - Improvements phased according to detailed schedule contained in agreement. Improvements will generally be installed as each planning area develops. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan and related land use amendments. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the EIR and recommended certification to the City Council. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: State law requires the Planning Commission to find that the Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The following facts support a finding of consistency: Fe The project will provide a mix of different, but compatible, land uses and activities, such as, recreational, commercial, office and industrial, as encouraged by the General Plan objectives. The proposed master plan organizes land uses in a fashion that is compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed master plan and mix of land uses supports the "centers" concept encouraged by the General Plan to foster multiple purpose trips and discourage frequent ingress/egress movement onto planned circulation routes. The project includes mixed-use development surrounding a commuter rail station which creates a built-in ridership. The master plan and mix of land uses will provide a wide range of employment opportunities with respect to income and skills as encouraged by the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The master plan and mix of land uses will accommodate the personal needs of workers and business visitors as well as the service needs of local businesses. The agreement encourages development by eliminating uncertainty and time and money consuming delays in the governmental processes. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS May 25, 1994 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this proposal. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval of Development Agreement 94-01. Re~pec~full v submitted, RG {DC: ml g Attachments: elopment Director Exhibit "A" - Subarea 18 Specific Plan Resolution of Approval with Development Agreement PLANNING AREA IX 21.0 Acres Fourth Street SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Ccm~nissioner Melcher suggested that the matter be continued to July 13, 1994, since. the City could not be responsible for a change to the applicant's schedule~ Mr. McConnell stated that the matter had been originally scheduled for the May 11, 1994, meeting but Knowlwood changed their name and they had to amend their artwork and missed getting it to staff by one day. He noted the application had been complete for some time. Chairman Barker stated the Commission was not questioning the applicant's need for a change of date, but he said the Commission must rely on staff's judgment and staff had indicated the June 8 agenda is full. Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, to continued Variance 93-05 and Amendment to Uniform Sign Program No. 88 to July 13, 1994. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: .- COMMISSIONERS NOES ~" COMMISSIONERS I~T: COMMISSIONERS BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER NONE MCNIEL, TOLSTOY -carried Ce ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - Review of a development agreement for the redevelopment of 380 acres of land, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, presented the staff report. Commissioner Melcher observed that when the Commission first began looking at the project there had been an overall schedule leading to final approval in July. Me noted that the text which the Commissioners had before them was not quite final and was delivered to them on Tuesday. He questioned why there was such a rush. Mr. Gomez responded that there had been no changes to the deal points during the last 60 to 90 days. He stated the Development Agreement is substantially in agreement with the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the applicant. Me said the discussions with General Dynamics have been very fluid. Commissioner Lumpp noted that the agreement had been attached to the Metrolink Agreement which the City Council had approved. Mr. Gomez believed that the Council was in agreement with the deal points and stated the Council had directed staff to move ahead with the Metrolink acquisition. Planning Commission Minutes -3- May 25, 1994 Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Jeff Kudlac, Kudlac Associates, 10900 East 4th Street, #601, Rancho Cucamonga, stated there had been many meetings with staff over the last several months and there had been many changes to address comments from the City attorney and staff. He felt that all of the issues had been addressed up to this point. He said their legal counsel and other staff were available to answer questions. He requested that ~he Commission recommend approval of the Development Agreement to the City Council. He said General Dynamics had asked that they move to get the golf course under construction as soon as possible. He felt confident that staff and the City attorney had had an opportunity to study the document carefully. He thanked the Commission for their support in moving the project through the process. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Commissioner Melcher felt strongly that inasmuch as the Metrolink Agreement binds the City to approve the Development Agreement pretty much as is, that any input from the Commission at this point would be meaningless. Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Barker, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Development Agreement No. 94-01 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER NONE MCNIEL, TOLSTOY -carried ~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-04 - NORTH TOWN HOUSING ~.U~VELOPMENT CORPORATION - The proposed development of 88 rental units for · 4.~ordable housing on 8.56 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential Dis~r~ct (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Old Town Park - A~N: 209-085-20. Relate~ Files: ConditionaI Use Permit 94-10, Pre-Application Revie~ 93-07, and Tree Removal Permit~ g4-01. Staff recommends issuance ~f · mitigated Negative Declaration. ~ E. ENVIRONMENTOr ASSESSMENT~ AND CONDITION~r- USE PERMIT 94-10 - NORTH TOWN HOUSING Dm"~Ev-OPMENT CORMRATION-- A recXuest to construct a 2,675 so]dare foot day care facility and r_e~e.~d parking on an approximate 1-acre portion of the 8.S6-acre, 88-uni~ - North Town affordable housing development, within the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), locate~ on the south side of Feron Boulevard, west of Old Town Park - A~N: 209-085-20. Related Files: Development Review 94-04, Pre-Application Review 93-07, and Tree Removal Permit 94-01. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Steve Hayes,. Associate Planner, presented the staff report and ceemented that two letters had been received regarding the project:' one free Shirley Weinstein opposing the project and one from the owner of the adjacent winery requesting that certain concerns be addressed. He stated that the Park and Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 25, 1994 RESOLUTION NO. ~4-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ~UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ENTER INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 94-01, FOR THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26. A. Recitals. 1. An application for Development Agreement (Zone Change) has been filed with the Planning Department for the redevelopsent of 380 acres of land bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue. 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore held a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, to consider the aforementioned Development Agreement. 3. The subject property of the Development Agreement is legally described heroin. 4. A true and correct copy of the proposed Development Agreement is attached as Exhibit "A" to this Resolution. 5. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the associated Environmental Impact Report prepared for said project. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORB, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. All of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Commission specifically finds that the Development Agreement and each and every term and provision contained therein conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. This Commission hereby finds that an Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, and the City's Environmental Impact Report Guidelines, and further, that this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Environmental Impact Report. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DA 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS May 25, 1994 Page 2 4. This Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A." 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 1994. '&TTESTz/~8~8~ ATTEST ------ I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coemaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonge, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSz MCNIEL, TOLSTOY 81 ORDINANCE NO. ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 94-01, FOR THE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 209-272-01 , 04, 07, AND 08; 210- 081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38, AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26. A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: (a) The lack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and co~nitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public. (b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs of development." (ii) California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "Any city . . · may enter into a Development Agreement with any person h~ving a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article . . ." (iii) follows: California Government Code Section 65865-2 provides, in part, as "A Development Agreement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density of intensity of use, the maxim height and size or proposed buildings, and provision for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The Development Agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the land for the uses and to the density of intensity of development set forth in the Agreement . . ." CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DA 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT July 6, 1994 Page 2 (iv) "Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, is proposed Development Agreement 94-01, concerning that property located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and 4th Street, and as legally described in the attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the "Development Agreement." (v) Prior to this Ordinance approving this Development Agreement, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 525 approving Specific Plan 93-01. (vi) On May 25, 1994, the Planning Cormmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date and reco-~ended approval through adoption of its Resolution 94-39. (vii) On July 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development Agreement. (viii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan 94-01 and the Development Agreement, and certified the Report, including adoption of a Statement' of Overriding Considerations, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. SECTION 3: Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-referenced public hearings on May 25 and July 6, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The location, design, and proposed uses set forth in this Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity. (b) The Development Agreement conform tO the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY COUNC'IL ORDINANCE NO. DA 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT July 6, 1994 Page 3 SECTION 4: It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement. SECTION 5: This Council hereby approves Development Agreement 94-01, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published with 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (Space above for Recorder's Use Only) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Between THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA and GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation Dated: , 1994 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION CONCERNING SUB-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN This Development Agreement is entered into this day of , 1994, by and between General Dynamics Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("GD") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (City") pursuant to the authority of Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code. GD and its successors and assigns are referred to collectively hereinafter as the "Property Owner." RECITALS: A. To provide more certainty in the approval of development projects, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California has adopted Sections 65864, et seq. of the California Government Code authorizing City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property in order to establish development rights with respect thereto. B. The City adopted Resolution No. 18-40 on April 6, 1981 pursuant to which it adopted the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (as amended prior to the date of this Development Agreement, the "General Plan"). Pursuant to Resolution No. 81-128 approved on August 19, 1981 and Ordinance No. 297 approved on September 17, 1986, the City adopted the Industrial Area Specific Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (as amended prior to the date of this Development Agreement, the "IASP"). The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("RDA") approved the Rancho Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan Amendment No. 1 by adopting Ordinance No. 316A on August 6, 1987 (as amended prior to the date of this Development Agreement, the "Redevelopment Plan"). C. Property Owner owns fee title to approximately 380 acres of real property located entirely within the City and more completely described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Project Site"). Property Owner has applied to City for the approval of a Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan (the "Sub- 219565 125757ll 1 Area 18 Specific Plan"), certain conforming amendments to the General Plan and the IASP, and approval of a tentative parcel map as described in Section 2.C.1 below (collectively, the "Specific Plan Entitlements,,). The Specific Plan Entitlements were approved by the City pursuant to Resolution No. and No. and Ordinance No. In accordance with the rules, regulations and policies of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's Guidelines for Implementing CEQA, the City has certified a Frogram EIR in connection with the Specific Plan Entitlements (the "EIR") as being accurate, adequate and complete in the environmental evaluation of the impacts associated with the Project and 5he implementation of this Development Agreement. D. The Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan contemplates a mixed-use development composed of a series of large anchor parcels surrounding an 18-hole golf course. In addition to the golf course, some of the principal features of the Sub- Area 18 Specific Plan include: a re-use program for the three existing buildings located on approximately 75 acres of the Project Site north of 4th Street and east of Utica Street (including potential development of associated parking facilities); adaptive recreational, commercial, and office uses; and the proposed site for a Metrolink station. The principal goals and objectives of the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan are identified in detail in Specific Plan Entitlements, and include permitting gre~ter planning flexibility and encouraging more creative and imaginative designs; providing a process for initiation, review, and regulation of the project area that affords the maximum flexibility to the property owner within the context of an overall development program and phased subdivisions, coordinated with the provision of necessary public services and facilities; and promoting a more marketable co~f~ercial focus and enhancing the potential to create jobs and revenue. The development of the Project Site pursuant to the terms of the Specific Plan Entitlements is referred to hereinafter as the "Project". E. This Development Agreement will enable City to realize significant financial, recreational, co~,~,,ercial and regional benefits and facilities. The development of the Project at the earliest practicable date will contribute toward the generation of City revenues and benefits and enhance the quality of life of present and future residents of the City. F. Property Owner and City hereby desire to provide for the development of the Project Site pursuant to 219565 12575711 2 the rules, regulations, policies and provisions described further herein. G. As further set forth in [describe Ordinance] adopted by City on ,1994, the execution of this Development Agreement and the performance of and compliance with the terms and conditions set forth herein by the parties hereto: (i) is in the best interest in the City; (ii) will promote the public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices in the City; (iii) will promote preservation of land values; (iv) will promote the policies and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and encourage the development of the Project by providing a level of certainty to the Property Owner; (v) will provide for orderly growth and development of the City consistent with the City's General Plan; and (vi) is consistent with the General Plan, the IASP, and the Specific Plan Entitlements. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, and the mutual promises and covenants of the parties herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. Term. The term of this Development Agreement shall commence on the effective date of the adopting Ordinance approving this Development Agreement and shall extend for a period of twenty (20) years thereafter, unless this Development Agreement is terminated, modified or extended by circumstances set forth in this Development Agreement (including, without limitation, the extensions provided below and any extension attributable to the "force majeure" circumstances described in Section 2.C.5 below) or by mutual consent of the parties hereto. Following the expiration of the term, this Development Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect; provided, however, that such termination shall not automatically affect any right or duty arising from project entitlements granted prior to, concurrently with, or subsequent to the approval of this Development Agreement. 21956~ |2'~75711 3 B. Assignment. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Property Owner shall have the right to convey, assign, sell, lease, sublease, encumber, hypothecate or otherwise transfer (for purposes of this Section 1B, "transfer") the Project Site in whole or in part, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Development Agreement. Upon the express assumption of any or all of the obligations of Property Owner under this Development Agreement by such purchaser or transferee of the Project Site or any portion thereof, Property Owner shall be relieved of its legal duty to perform said obligations under this Development Agreement at the time of assignment, except to the extent Property Owner is in Default of any of the terms of this Development Agreement when the property is sold or transferred. If one or more of such parcels comprising the Project Site are sold or transferred and there is noncompliance by the transferee owner with respect to the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement (to the extent such terms and conditions have been expressly assumed by such transferee), or by the transferor with respect to any portion of the Project not sold or transferred, such noncompliance shall be deemed a breach of this Agreement by that transferee or transferor as applicable, but shall not be deemed to be a breach hereunder against other persons then owning or holding any interest in any other portion of the Project and not themselves in breach hereunder. Any alleged default shall be governed by the provisions of Section 3 below. In no event shall the reservation or dedication of a part or parts of the Project Site to a public agency cause a transfer of duties and obligations hereunder to such public agency unless specifically stated to be the case in this Development Agreement, any of the exhibits attached hereto, the instrument of conveyance used for such reservation or dedication, or other form of agreement with such public agency. C. Amendment of Agreement. This Development Agreement may be amended from time to time by mutual consent of the parties in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868. Notwithstanding anything stated to the contrary herein, the parties may enter into one or more implementing agreements, in accordance with the following paragraph, to clarify the 21956~ 12575711 4 intended application or interpretation of the Development Agreement. Property Owner and City acknowledge that the provisions of this Development Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between Property Owner and City, and that in the course of implementing the Project it may be necessary to supplement this Development Agreement to address the details of the parties' performance and to otherwise effectuate the purpose of this Development Agreement and the intent of the parties with respect thereto. If and when, from time to time, the parties find that it is necessary or appropriate to clarify the application or interpretation of this Development Agreement without amending any of the Development Agreement's material terms, the parties may do so through an implementing agreement, which, after execution, shall be attached hereto as addenda and become a part hereof, and may be further changed or supplemented from time to time as necessary. Such implementing agreements shall only be executed by the Community Development Director (on behalf of the City) if the Community Development Director has determined that such implementing agreements are not materially inconsistent with this Development Agreement, the Specific Plan Entitlements, and the ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies in force at the time of execution of this Development Agreement. Any changes to this Agreement which would impose additional obligations on the City beyond those which would be deemed to arise under a reasonable interpretation of this Agreement, or would purport to change land use designations applicable to the Project Site under the Specific Plan Entitlements will be considered "material" and require a formal amendment of this Agreement. Section 2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. A. Land Use Entitlements. During the term of this Development Agreement, the permitted uses for the Project, or any portion thereof, the density and intensity of use, zoning, maximum height and size of proposed buildings, building and yard setback requirements, provisions for reservations or dedications, design and performance standards and other terms and conditions of development of the Project shall be those set forth in the Specific Plan Entitlements and any other applicable Project Entitlements (as hereinafter defined). Pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Specific Plan, Property Owner may apply from time to time for the approval of a master plan ("Master Plan") with 219565 12575711 5 respect to each Planning Area comprising the Project Site. Upon approval of such Master Plan, the Property Owner with respect to such Planning Area shall have the right to proceed with development in accordance with such Master Plan approval and shall be legally vested with respect to all land use designations, design and performance standards, provisions for dedications and reservations and other terms and conditions of development contained therein ("Master Plan Entitlemerits") for a period of five (5) years following such approval. On the date of the Annual Review following such 5-year term, upon application by the Property Owner of such Planning Area, the Community Development Director shall determine whether the vesting of Master Plan Entitlements for the Planning Area should continue for an additional 5- year period. Such determination shall be based upon the reasonable progress of development within the applicable Planning Area during the preceding 5-year period and the reasonable viability of the Master Plan for such Planning Area. Any decision by the Co~f~uunity Development Director not to extend the Master Plan Entitlements shall be appealable, in the first instance, to the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 17.02.080 A of the City Development Code, subject to further appeal to the City Council pursuant to Section 17.02.080B. The failure to extend such Master Plan Entitlements shall not in any way affect the other rights of the Property Owner vested under this Development Agreement and shall not affect any Project Entitlements applicable to any other Pla,nning Area. Upon approval of each Development/Design Review application for any individual construction project within a Planning Area, all development plans approved in connection with such application shall be legally vested for a period of five (5) years thereafter, and the Property Owner with respect to such approved Development/Design Review shall be entitled to~proceed with development on the basis thereof (the "Development/Design Review Entitlemerits"). The expiration of such Development/Design Review Entitlements shall not in any way affect the other Project Entitlements vested hereunder, including the Specific Plan Entitlements and Master Plan Entitlements applicable to the parcel in question, and any Project Entitlements, including any Development/Design Review Entitlements, applicable to any other parcel within the Project Site. The Specific Plan Entitlements, the Master Plan Entitlements, and the Development/Design Review Entitlements, along with all other rights vested under this Development Agreement are referred to hereinafter as the "Project Entitlements." In consideration of this Development Agreement, Property Owner has agreed to pay or provide to City the fees, charges, public benefit payments, mitigations, 21956~5 [25757|1 6 91 improvements, dedications, reservations and other benefits expressly. provided for and set forth in the Specific Plan Entitlements (collectively, "Exactions',), which Exactions are set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto (provided that, in the event of any conflict between Exhibit "B" and the terms of the Specific Plan Entitlements, the Specific Plan Entitlements shall control). Other than the Exactions, the phased infrastructure improvements described in Exhibit C, and the Fees described in Exhibit D, City shall not impose or require any additional fees, charges, public benefit or facility payments, mitigations, improvements, dedications, reservations or benefits for development or construction of the Project, except as expressly permitted under this Section 2, of as may be required by applicable state or federal law. B. Rules and Regulations. Pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code Section 65866, except as otherwise explicitly provided in this Development Agreement, the ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Project Site, the density and intensity of such uses, and design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the Project, shall be those ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies and General Plan and IASP provisions in force at the time=of execution of this Development Agreement, including but not limited to the zoning adopted pursuant to the Specific Plan Entitlements ("Existing Laws"). City shall not be prevented in subsequent actions applicable to the Project, from applying new ordinances, rules, regulations, policies and General and Specific Plan provisions then in effect ("Future Policies") which do not conflict with the Existing Laws, the Project Entitlements, or the express provisions of this Development Agreement. Such conflict shall be deemed to occur if, without limitation, such Future Policies: (i) modify the permitted types of land uses, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height or size of proposed buildings on the Property, building and yard setback requirements, or impose requirements for the construction or provision of on-site or off-site improvements or the reservation or dedication of land for public use, or the payment of fees or the imposition of exactions, other than as are in each case specifically provided for in this Development Agreement; (ii) prevent the Property Owner from obtaining all necessary approvals, permits, certificates or other 219565 12575711 7 entitlements at such dates and under such circumstances as the Proper~y Owner would otherwise be entitled under this Development Agreement; (iii) prevent or inhibit Property Owner from commencing, prosecuting and finishing on a timely basis the construction and development of the Project or the satisfaction of Property Owner's obligations hereunder in the manner and as contemplated by this Development Agreement. C. Timing of Development. 1. Development of the Golf Course. GD has applied to City for the approval of a parcel map subdividing the Project Site into the Planning Areas identified in the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan (the "Phase I Subdivision") providing for certain improvements necessary to operate the Golf Course (as defined in paragraph 2.C.3 below), and deferring improvements on the remainder of the Project Site until individual Planning Areas are ready to be developed as contemplated in paragraph 2.C.2 below. In consideration of the rights afforded it under this Development Agreement, Property Owner agrees that it will apply to City for the approval of grading and building permits necessary to develop an 18-hole championship quality golf course within Planning Areas IA and IB (the "Golf Course") within 12 mon6hs after recordation of a final parcel map with respect to the Phase I Subdivision. No Development/Design Review shall be required with respect to the Golf Course. Upon receipt of all necessary grading and building permits, Property Owner agrees to proceed diligently with the construction of the Golf Course and shall use its best reasonable efforts to complete construction of the Golf Course, including, without limitation, all improvements with respect thereto identified in the Phase I Subdivision, within 24 months after all applicable permits for construction have been issued. The periods for proceeding with development and construction of the Golf Course are subject to extension due to force majeure events as described in Section 2.C.5 below. 2. Development of Remainder of Project Site. Neither Property Owner nor City can presently predict when or the rate at which phases of the Project Site will be developed, since such decisions depend upon numerous factors which are not within the control of Property Owner, including but not limited to market orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, competition, and other factors. 219565 [2S757ll 8 The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that Property Owner retains flexibility hereunder to develop the Property in such order and at such rate and times as are appropriate within'the exercise of the Property Owner's business judgment. The City further acknowledges that GD may desire to market, sell, or otherwise arrange for disposition of some or all of the Planning Areas (including the Golf Course) comprising the Project Site, in whole or in part prior to development, and that the rate at which the Project develops will likely depend upon the business judgement of subsequent owners of the Project Site. 3. Infrastructure Phasing. The principal infrastructure associated with the development of the Project is identified in Exhibit C attached hereto (the "Principal Infrastructure"). The Principal Infrastructure will be constructed in phases as individual Planning Areas are developed or reused as referenced under recitals paragraph D. The phasing of the Principal Infrastructure is described further in Exhibit C. 4. City's Cooperation. The City shall use its best good faith efforts to process and take final action on Property Owner's applications for land use permits and approvals within the time periods set forth in the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan. Such cooperation shall include, without limitation, using its reasonable efforts to process subsequent Development/Design Review projects in accordance with the time periods set forth in the following paragraph; completing any required environmental review in accordance with Section 2E below as soon as reasonably possible; in instances where a Property Owner is applying for concurrent land use approvals, including, subdivision, master plan, or Development/Design Review, carefully coordinating and streamlining all applicable filing and submission requirements, committee meetings, review processes, and hearings to avoid duplication and delays to the greatest extent practicable; and promptly processing all Non- Discretionary Permits in accordance with Section 2G below. Any future regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of development of the Project Site or the extent thereof shall be deemed to conflict with the rights to development of the Project hereunder and shall to that extent not be applicable to the development of the Property. City agrees to use its reasonable efforts to process all Development/Design Review Projects within Sub- 12575711 9 Area 18 to be approved by the City Planner in accordance with the following schedule: (1) As soon as reasonably possible, but in any event within thirty (30) days of the submission of an application for Development/Design Review, the Community Development Department shall advise the applicant in writing of any additional information which needs to be provided in order to consider such application complete. If, after resubmittal by the applicant, additional information is still needed, the Community Development Department shall so notify the applicant within ten (10) days of such resubmission; provided, however, that such 10-day period shall not apply in the event required soils and drainage reports are not included in the initial submission, and such period shall not shorten the thirty (30) day period for reviewing the initial submission application. (2) In the event no further environmental review document is required, co~f~ittee reviews and staff reports shall be completed fifteen (15) days after the date the application is deemed complete in accordance with paragraph (1) above (or, in the event the application is deemed complete prior to the initial 30-day period, within 45 days after initial submission of the application). (3) In the event that no further environmental documentation is required as provided above, the City Planner shall make a final decision on the application'within thirty (30) days after the application is deemed complete in accordance with paragraph (1) above (or if the application is deemed complete prior to the expiration of the first thirty (30) days after submission, within sixty (60) days after initial submission of the application). 5. Force Majeure. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Development Agreement, Property Owner and City shall be excused from performance of their obligations hereunder during any period of delay caused by acts of God or civil commotion, riots, strikes, picketing, or other labor disputes, shortage of materials or supplies, or damage to or prevention of work by reason of fire, floods, earthquake, or other casualties, litigation, acts or neglect of the other party, or any other cause beyond the reasomable control of the City or Property Owner, as applicable. The time of performance of such obligations as well as the term of this Development Agreement shall automatically be extended by the period of such delay hereunder. 219565 12575711 10 D. Future Entitlements. City shall retain its discretionary review authority with respect to future entitlements for development of the Project, including, but not limited to, to the extent applicable, tentative tract and parcel map approvals, Master Plan approvals, conditional use permits, and Development/Design Review. However, any such discretionary review shall be expressly subject to the provisions of this Development Agreement, and City may only impose conditions upon such discretionary entitlements which are consistent with the Project Entitlements, and the terms of this Development Agreement, except as otherwise specifically required by state or federal law. E. Environmental Review. Other than the mitigation measures and conditions of approval set forth in the EIR and the Specific Plan Entitlements (and any additional future mitigation programs contemplated therein), no other mitigation measures for environmental impacts created by the Project, as presently approved and as addressed by the EIR, appear to be necessary. The EIR was prepared and certified as a Program EIR within the meaning of 14 Cal. Admin. Code § 15168, and is intended to analyze and cover the Project as a whole. In connection with City's issuance of any discretionary permit or approval which is subject to CEQA, City shall promptly commence and diligently process any and all initial studies and assessments required by CEQA, and to the extent permitted by CEQA, the City shall use and adopt the EIR and other existing environmental reports and studies as adequately.addressing the environmental impacts of such matter or matters without requiring new or supplemental environmental documentation. In the event CEQA requires any additional environmental review, the City may impose additional measures (or conditions) to mitigate as permitted by law the adverse environmental impacts of such discretionary entitlements which were not considered at the time of approval of the Project; provided, however, that: (i) Unless required by state or federal law, no new or additional mitigation measures shall be imposed as a result of any Future Policies; and (ii) City agrees and acknowledges that the traffic impact analysis ("TIA") incorporated in the EIR has fully analyzed the traffic projected to be generated from the Project, and, in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including, without limitation, the TIA Guidelines set forth in the San Bernardino County Congestion 21956~ 125757]1 11 Management Plan ("CMP"), a total of 45,200 trips may be generated prior to the year 2010 without the necessity of preparing a new TIA. In the event and at such time as the Project generates more than 45,200 vehicle trips, the City may require a new TIA in accordance with such CMP standards as may exist at such time. Except in such event (and except for such traffic circulation/site-access analysis as may be reasonably required to determine the configuration and alignment of streets adjacent or internal to the Project), no further TIA's shall be required by the City with respect to implementation of the Project. The EIR, which has been certified as a Program EIR under CEQA, also satisfies the requirements of a Master EIR under Section 21157 of the Public Resources Code. Because the distinctions between a Program EIR and a Master EIR remain unclear pending adoption of revised State Guidelines for implementing CEQA, Property Owner has reserved the right to request City to adopt such additional resolutions and findings concerning the status of the EIR as a Master EIR if subsequent legal requirements make such designation advisable or desirable in implementing the intent of this Development Agreement. City agrees to fully cooperate with Property Owner in complying with such request, and will do so unless prohibited by applicable state or federal law. City Fees and Mandates by State or Federal Law~. , The parties acknowledge and agree that the fees and impositions which may potentially be imposed by City on the Project and Property Owner fall within one of three categories (collectively, "Fees"): (a) fees for processing land use and building applications which are not otherwise governed by the provisions of Section 66000 of the Government Code (but which are subject to the limitations set forth in Sections 66013, 66014 and 66016-66018.5 of the Government Code) (the "Processing Fees"); (b) fees or other monetary exactions which are contemplated under ordinances or resolutions in effect as of the date of this Development Agreement and which purport to defray all or a portion of the cost of impacts to certain public facilities, improvements and other amenities from development projects, including any fees described in Government Code Sections 66000 et. seq. (collectively, the "Existing Fee Categories") (the Existing Fee Categories include any increases, decreases, or other modifications to existing fees, so long as such modified fees relate to the same category of impacts identified in the Existing Fee Categories); and (c) fees or other monetary exactions which may be imposed in the future by the City for purposes of 219565 12575711 12 defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities, improvements, or amenities related to development projects, but excluding the Existing Fee Categories ("Other Fees"). The Property Owner's obligation to pay Fees shall be specifically governed by the following provisions: 1. Processing Fees. The City may charge Processing Fees which are in force and effect on a City-wide basis at the time of a Property Owner's application for a land use or building permit or approval. The amount of any Processing Fees shall be determined by the City in accordance with all applicable laws, including Government Code Sections 66013, 66014 and 66017-66018.5 (or any successor laws, as applicable). Unless otherwise agreed by Property Owner and City, the Processing Fees assessed Property Owner shall be the same as those imposed upon other development projects throughout the City. 2. Existing Fee Categories. Exhibit D attached hereto contains a description of each of the Existing Fee Categories and the Property Owner's obligations with respect thereto. Other than the obligations set forth in Exhibit D, neither Property Owner nor the Project shall be subject to any additional City-imposed fees, impositions or monetary exactions with respect to any Existing Fee Categories for a period of five (5) years following the date of this Agreement. No fees in respect of Existing Fee Categories shall be charged or assessed a~ any tim~ against the Golf Course, the golf practice/training facilities and all golf-related improvements to be located within Planning Area III, or any improvements to be constructed thereon, including, without limitation, the clubhouse, maintenance building, practice facility structure, and any other golf- related facilities; provided, however, that in the event Property Owner seeks to expand the clubhouse initially constructed on the Golf Course in a manner which would, but for this Agreement, result in the imposition of a fee in respect of an Existing Fee Category, or, after initial construction of the Golf Course and related improvements, Property Owner seeks to construct a separate structure for restaurant or other public-serving uses unrelated to Golf Course maintenance or operation, then such activities shall be subject to fees in respect of Existing Fee Categories as otherwise provided in this Agreement. Additionally, from and after the date Property Owner receives Development/Design Review approval for a construction project, to the extent any fees, impositions, or monetary exactions with respect to any Existing Fee Categories are not otherwise fixed pursuant to this Section 2.F.2, for a period of five years after the date of such Development/Design Review approval, such fees shall be those 219565 12575711 13 adopted by the City as of the date of such Development/Design Review approval. The period during which fees are limited as described in this paragraph (and as further applied in paragraph 3 below) is referred hereinafter as the "Fee Limitation Period." 3. Other Fees. In consideration of the Exactions and Property Owner's agreement to cause the development of the Golf Course in accordance with the terms set forth above, no Other Fees shall be imposed upon Property Owner or the Project during the applicable Fee Limitation Period, except as may be specifically required to carry out any new state or federal law or mandate, or as necessary to mitigate environmental impacts of the project in accordance with Section 2E above. In such event, any such Other Fees shall be limited to Property Owner's fair share contribution to impacts created by the Project, shall not discriminate against the Property Owner (as compared to other property owners in the City), and shall not duplicate any Exactions or other mitigations or fees contributed or paid by Property Owner or the Project. G. Non-Discretionary Permits. The parties acknowledge that in the course of implementing the Project, Property Owner will, from time to time, apply to City for various non-discretionary permits, licenses, consents, certificates, and approvals, including, without limitation, non-discretionary suDdivision approvals, grading permits, building permits, certificates of occupancy, and any permits necessary to connect the Project to utility systems under the City's jurisdiction (collectively, the "Non-Discretionary Permits"). Property Owner shall have the right to apply for any such Non-Discretionary Permits in accordance with the Existing Laws (and any applicable Future Policies pursuant to Section 2B). City shall issue to Property Owner, upon such applications, all necessary Non-Discretionary Permits, subject to compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the City's Existing Laws (and any applicable Future Policies pursuant to Section 2B) and payment of City's usual and customary fees and charges for such applications and Non-Discretionary Permits (subject to the provisions of Section F.1 above). City further agrees that upon its approval of any plans, specifications, design drawings, maps, or other submittals of Property Owner in connection with such Non-Discretionary Permits (the "Approved Plans"), all further entitlements, approvals, and consents required from City to implement the Project which are consistent with and further implement such Approved Plans shall be expeditiously processed and approved by City in accordance 219565 [25757] I 14 with this Agreement. Property Owner shall be entitled to rely upon such Approved Plans in constructing, developing, and implementing the Project, and City shall not, within two (2) years of their approval require Property Owner to modify or amend any such Approved Plans unless, and only to the extent, the conditions pursuant to which the Project will be implemented have materially changed subsequent to the approval of such Approved Plans in a manner which requires modifications in order to mitigate specifically identified threats to the public health and safety, or such changes arising out of an error or omission by the Property Owner. Cooperation. 1. Cooperation With Other Public Agencies. City hereby acknowledges that Property Owner may apply from time to time for permits and approvals as may be required by other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Project in connection with the development of, or provision of services to, the Project, including, without limitation, approvals in connection with developing and implementing a tertiary water system, potential transportation improvements, and other on- site and off-site infrastructure. City shall cooperate with Property Owner in its efforts to obtain such permits and approvals from such agencies (including, without limitation, the Cucamonga County Water District, Chino Basin Municipal Water District, the Municipal Water District, and the City of Ontario), and shall provide any documents or certificates reasonably required to process and obtain such permits and approvals. Such cooperation may specifically include assisting Property Owner in obtaining certain permits from the City of Ontario in connection with the potential discharge of surface water to drainage improvements to be located along 4th Street south of the Project Site. 2. Construction of Off-Site Improvements. To the extent that Property Owner is required to construct any off-site improvements as a condition to developing the Project. The Property Owner shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if it should fail to do so, the Property Owner shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final subdivision map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Property Owner of all costs 219565 |2575711 15 100 incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Property Owner, at Property Owner cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. To the extent that such off- site improvements, or the construction of any substantial infrastructure on-site, substantially benefit other property owners within the IASP or other portions of the City, City agrees to reasonably assist Property Owner in obtaining reimbursement or other fair share contribution by such other benefitted property owners. Such assistance may include, without limitation, conditioning the approval of development projects proposed by such benefitted property owners upon such owners, contribution on a fair share, pro-rata basis to the construction costs of such improvements. City specifically agrees that with respect to the infrastructure improvements identified in Exhibit C attached hereto which are adjacent to and benefit other properties (whether such properties are undeveloped or developed), any further discretionary approvals sought by such property owners shall be conditioned to require fair share reimbursement to Property Owner for construction and related costs incurred in providing such improvements. 3. Public Financinq. The parties hereby acknowledge that substantial public improvements must be constructed in order to develop the Golf Course and the remainder of the Project Site and that public financing of a substantial portion of these improvements will be critical to the economic viability of the Project. Subject to the City's ability to make all findings required by applicable law and complying with all applicable legal procedures and requirements, City agrees to cooperate with and assist Property Owner to the fullest extent possible in developing and implementing a public financing plan for the construction of the public infrastructure improvements described in Exhibit C hereto. The implementation of such plan may include, without limitation, the formation of one or more assessment districts or Mello-Roos co~tunity facilities districts, or other debt securities necessary to implement such plan. All formation costs shall be borne by the Property Owner. 219565 [ 2575711 16 101 Section 3. ANNUAL REVIEW. A. Good Faith Compliance. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65865.1, City shall, once every twelve (12) months during the term of this Development Agreement, review the extent of good faith substantial compliance by Property Owner with the terms of this Development Agreement; provided, however, that it is intended that this review shall apply to the Project Site as a whole, as opposed to each individual Property Owner who may own a parcel comprising the Project Site. In connection with such annual review, the Property Owner shall provide such information as may be reasonably requested by the City in order to determine whether any provisions of this Agreement have been breached by such Property Owner. If at any time prior to the review period there is an issue concerning a Property Owner's compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement, the provisions of this Section 3 will apply. B. Certificate of Compliance. If the Property Owner is found to be in compliance with this Development Agreement after annual review, the Community Development Director shall, upon written request by the Property Owner, issue a certificate of compliance ("Certificate of Compliance") to the Property Owner stating that based upon information known to the City, the Development Agreement remains in effect and the Property Owner is not in default. The Certificate of Compliance shall be in recordable form and shall contain such information as shall impart constructive record notice of compliance. The Property Owner may record the Certificate of Compliance in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino. C. Finding of Default. If, upon completion of the annual review, the Community Development Director intends to find that the Property Owner has not complied in good faith with the material terms of this Development Agreement ("Default"), he shall first give written notice to such effect to the Property Owner. The notice shall be accompanied by copies of all staff reports, staff recommendations and other information concerning the Property Owner's compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement as City may possess which is relevant to determining Property Owner's performance under this Agreement. The notice shall specify 2|9565 [25757]1 17 102 in detail the grounds and all facts demonstrating such noncompliance, so that the Property Owner may address the issues raised on a point-by-point basis. Property Owner Shall have twenty (20) days after its receipt of such notice to file a written response with the Community Development Director. Within 10 days after the expiration of such 20- day response period, the Community Development Director shall notify Property Owner whether Property Owner is deemed to be in Default under this Agreement ("Notice of Default,,). Such Notice of Default shall specify the instances in which the Property Owner has failed to comply with the Development Agreement and the terms under which compliance can be obtained. The Notice of Default shall also specify a reasonable time for the Property Owner to meet the terms of compliance, which time shall not be less than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice of Default and shall be reasonably related to the time necessary to bring the Property Owner's performance into good faith compliance. D. Right to Appeal. Upon receipt of a Notice of Default, Property Owner may appeal the Community Development Director's decision directly to the City Council. Such appeal shall be initiated by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within ten (10) calendar days following Property Owner's receipt of the Notice of Default. The hearing on such appeal shall be scheduled in accordance with Section 17.02,080 of the City Development Code. =At the hearing, the Property Owner shall be entitled to submit evidence and to address all of the issues raised by the Notice of Default. If, after considering all of the evidence presented at the hearing, the City Council finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence that the Property Owner is in Default, then the City Council shall specify in writing to the Property Owner the instances in which the Property Owner has' failed to comply and the terms under which compliance can be obtained, and shall also specify a reasonable time for the Property Owner to meet the terms of compliance, which time shall not be less than thirty (30) days from the date of such notice and shall be reasonably related to the time necessary to bring the Property Owner's performance into good faith compliance. E. Property 0wner's Cure RiGhts. If Property Owner is in Default under this Development Agreement, it shall have a reasonable period of time to cure such Default before action is taken by City to terminate this Agreement or otherwise amend or limit Property Owner's rights hereunder. In no event shall such 219565 12575711 18 103 cure period be less than the time set forth in the finding of Default made pursuant to Sections 3C or 3D (as applicable) above or less than the time reasonably necessary to cure such default. Any such cure period shall be. extended by the force majeure circumstances described in Section 2C above. Section 4. ENFORCEMENT. A. Enforceable by Either Party. Subject to all requirements mandated by applicable state or federal or other law, this Development Agreement shall be enforceable by any party hereto. B. Cumulative Remedies. In addition to any other rights or remedies, any party may institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default (to the extent otherwise permitted herein and in Government Code Section 65864 et seq. or any successor laws and regulations), to enforce any covenant or agreement herein, or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation, including suits for declaratory relief, specific performance, and relief in the nature of mandamus. All of the remedies described above shall be cumulative and not exclusive of one another, and the exercise of any one or more of the remedies shall not constitute a waiver or election with respect to any other available remedy. The provisions of this Section 4B are not intended to modify other provisions of this Development Agreement and are not intended to provide additional remedies not otherwise permitted by law. C. Attorneys' Fees. In any legal proceedings brought by either party to enforce any covenant or any of such party's rights or remedies under this Development Agreement, including any action for declaratory or equitable relief, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and all reasonable costs, expenses and disbursements in connection with such action. Any such attorneys' fees and other expenses incurred by either party in enforcing a judgment in its favor under this Development Agreement shall be recoverable separately from and in addition to any other amount included in such judgment, and such attorneys' fees obligation is intended to be severable from the other provisions of this Development Agreement and to survive and not be merged into any such judgment. 2 19565 12575711 19 104 Section 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Successors and Assigns. The terms of this Development Agreement shall be binding upon an inure to the benefit of the parties, and their successors and assigns. B. Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Development Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Development Agreement. The only relationship between the City and Property Owner is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such private property. C. Captions. The captions of this Development Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall in no way define, explain, modify, construe, limit, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning 6f any of the provisions of this Development Agreement. D. Mortgagee Protection. 1. Discretion to Encumber. This Development Agreement shall not prevent or limit Property Owner, in any manner, at Property Owner's sole discretion, from encumbering the Property or any portion of the Property or any improvement on the Property by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to all or any part of the Property or any improvement thereon (a "Mortgage,,). 2. Effect of Default. This Development Agreement shall be superior and senior to any Mortgage subsequently placed upon the Property, or any portion thereof, or any improvement thereon, including the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust. Despite the foregoing, breach of any provision of this Development Agreement shall not defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith and for value. 219565 [2575711 2O 105 3. Mortgagee Not Obligated. Notwithstanding anything in this Development Agreement to the contrary, (i) any holder of the beneficial interest under a Mortgage ("Mortgagee") may acquire title to or possession of all or any portion of the Property or any improvement thereon pursuant to the remedies provided by its Mortgage, whether by judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise, and such Mortgagee shall not have any obligation under this Development Agreement to construct, fund or otherwise perform any affirmative obligation or affirmative covenant of Property Owner hereunder or to guarantee such performance, and Mortgagee may, after acquiring title to all or any portion of the Property as aforesaid, assign or otherwise transfer the Property or any such portion thereof to any person or entity, and upon the giving of notice of such assignment or transfer to City and the assumption by the assignee or transferee of the obligations of Property Owner with respect to the Property or portion thereof so acquired which arise or accrue from and after the date of assignment or transfer, Mortgagee shall be relieved and discharged of and from any and all further obligations or liabilities under this Development Agreement with respect to the Property or portion thereof so assigned or transferred; and (ii) the consent of City shall not be required for the acquisition of all or any portion of the Property by any purchaser at a foreclosure sale conducted pursuant to the terms of any Mortgage, and such purchaser shall, by virtue of acquiring title to the Property or such portion thereof, be deemed to have assumed all obligations of the Property Owner with respect to the Property or portion thereof so acquired which arise or accrue subsequent to the date of purchase, but such purchaser shall not be responsible for any prior defaults of Property Owner; provided, however, that in either of the instances referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) above, to the extent any obligation or covenant to be performed by Property Owner is a condition to the granting of a specific benefit or to the performance of a specific covenant by City, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to City's granting of such benefit and performance of such covenant hereunder. 4. Notice of Default to Mortgagee: Right of Mortgagee to Cure. If a Mortgagee files with the City Clerk a written notice requesting a copy of any notice of default given Property Owner hereunder and specifying the address for delivery thereof, then City shall deliver to such Mortgagee, concurrently with delivery thereof to Property Owner, any notice given to Property Owner with respect to any claim of City that Property Owner has not complied with the terms hereof or is otherwise in Default hereunder. Each 219565 12575711 2 1 106 such Mortgagee shall have the right (but not the obligation) for a period of thirty (30) days after the expiration of any cure period given to Property Owner with respect to such Default, to cure said default; provided, however, that if any such Default cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such Mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to remedy or cure such Default if such Mortgagee commences to remedy or cure within such thirty (30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such remedy or cure. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Default is of a nature which can only be cured by Mortgagee by obtaining possession, such Mortgagee shall be deened to have remedied or cured such Default if such Mortgagee shall, within such thirty (30) day period, con~uence efforts to obtain possession and carry the same forward with diligence and continuity through implementation of foreclosure, appointment of a receiver or otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure or commence to remedy or cure the Default within the cure period specified in Section 3E above. 5. Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 4 above, if a Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof to obtain possession of the Project Site by any process or injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving Property Owner, Mortgagee shall for the purposes hereof be deemed to be proceeding with diligence and continuity to obtain possession of the Property during the period of such prohibition if Mortgagee is proceeding diligently to terminate such prohibition. 6. Amendment to Development Agreement. City and Property Owner agree not to modify or amend this Development Agreement or allow this Development Agreement to be modified or amended in any way, or cancel this Development Agreement, without the prior written consent of each Mortgagee, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding anything stated above to the contrary, City and Property Owner shall cooperate in including in this Development Agreement by suitable implementing agreement from time to time any provision which may reasonably be requested by a proposed Mortgagee for the purpose of implementing the mortgagee-protection provisions contained in this Development Agreement and allowing such Mortgagee reasonable means to protect or preserve the lien of the Mortgage on the occurrence of a default under the terms of this Development Agreement. City and Property 219565 12575711 2 2 107 Owner each agree to execute and deliver (and to acknowledge, if necessary, for recording purposes) any implementing agreement necessary to effect such request; provided, however, that any such implementing agreement shall not in any material respect adversely affect any rights of City hereunder or be materially inconsistent with the substantive provisions of this Development Agreement, the Specific Plan Entitlements and the Existing Laws. E. Consent. Where the consent or approval of a party is required in or necessary under this Development Agreement, unless the context otherwise indicates, such consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. F. Entire Agreement. This Development Agreement and the documents attached hereto and referred to herein constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Development Agreement. G. Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performanc~ of all obligations under this Development Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Development Agreement. H. Governing Law. This Development Agreement, including, without limitation, its existence, validity, construction and operation, and the rights of each of the parties shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California. I. Recording. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Development Agreement to be recorded in the office of the Recorder of San Bernardino County no later than ten (10) days following execution of this Development Agreement by all parties. J. Time. Time is of the essence in this Development Agreement and of each and every term and condition hereof. 219565 [2575711 2 3 108 K. Waiver. The failure of either party at any time to seek redress for any violation of this Development Agreement or any applicable law or regulation or to insist upon the strict performance of any term or condition shall not prevent any subsequent act or omission of the same or similar nature which would have originally constituted a breach of or default under this Development Agreement from having all the force and effect of an original breach or default, and such subsequent act or omission may be proceeded against to the fullest extent provided by this Development Agreement. No provision of this Development Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by a party unless the waiver is in writing and signed by such party. L. Partial Invalidity. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Development Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the reminder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. M. Notices. All notices between the City and the Property Owner and any transferee under this Developmen~ Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by personal delivery, mail or facsimile. Notice by personal delivery or facsimile shall be deemed effective upon the delivery of such notice to the party for which it is intended at the address set forth below (or, in the case of a transferee, at the address specified by such transferee in a written notice to City). Notice by mail shall be deemed effective two (2) business days after depositing such notice postage prepaid, registered or certified, return receipt requested, properly sealed with the United States Postal Service, addressed as set forth below, regardless of whether or when the notice is actually received. The parties' current address are as follows: To City: Attn: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Community Development Director To Property Owner: Attn: General Dynamics 5001 Kearny Villa Road San Diego, California Mr. Richard Hadinger 92123 219565 12575711 24 With copies to: Mr. Stephen Elmer 1412 Canterra Court Pebble Beach, California 93953 Morrison & Foerster 555 West 5th Street, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, CA 90017-1027 Attention: Donald I. Berger, Esq. Either party may change its mailing address or the person to whom notices are to be sent at any time by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided herein. N. Binding Effect. The covenants and agreements contained in this Development Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and shall be binding upon each of the parties and their respective heirs, administrators, successors and assigns. O. Indemnification. GD hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and its agents, officers, and employees (the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the Indemnified Parties to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Development Agreement. GD's obligations under this Section 4.0 are subject to and conditioned upon City and GD entering into a mutually satisfactory Joint Defense Agreement pursuant to which City shall cooperate fully with GD in the defense of the lawsuit, GD will be entitled to coordinate and direct the prosecution and defense of such lawsuit, and GD shall retain settlement authority with respect thereto. City and GD agree not to unreasonably withhold or delay their approval of such Joint Defense Agreement. 219565 [2575711 2 5 110 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Development Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation By: By: Mayor Name: Its: ATTESTED TO: By: Name: Its: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 219S65 [2.~7,~7] I 26 104UN-94 14:03:08 111 EXi!IBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION GENERAL DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF LOTSl, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15 AND 16 IN TIlE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTIt, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN TIlE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, AND THAT PORTION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE VACATED BY THE COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RESOLUTION NO. 81-94, RECORDED JUNE 29, 1981, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 81-142194 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN SAID OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY RECORDER, AND THAT PORTION OF 8TII STREET VACATED BY TIlE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RESOLUTION NO. 83-99, RECORDED JULY 5, 1983, AS INSTRUHENT NO. 83-148882 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS A W}~LE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF TIlE SOUTIIERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13 WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF TIlE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 00° 05' 03" EAST 597.60 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN CERTIFICATE OF COHPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED JUNE 5, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-202498 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID SOUTIIEAST CORNER BEING Tile TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 00° 05' 03" EAST 1983.13 FEET TO TIlE NORTtIERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTII,ERLY LINE, NORTH 89° 31' 41" WEST 2594.98 FEET TO TIlE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID NORTItEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTll 00° 06' 32" WEST 1412.83 FEET TO THE EASTERLY PROJECTION OF TIlE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL 11 OF AMENDING MAP OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6194, AS SItOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 66, PAGES 66 THROUGH 70, I~CLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE ALONG SAID PROJECTION, NORTH 85° 51' 44" WEST 30.08 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, SAID WESTERLY LINE ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID AHENDING MAP OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6194; THENCE ALONG TIlE LAST MENTIONED WESTERLY LINE, NORTH 00° 06' 32" WEST 1151.23 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF TIlE NORTHERLY 50.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89° 51' 00" EAST 1895.99 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES, RESPECTIVELY, OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2, SOUTH 00~ 05' 03" EAST 599.15 FEET AND SOUTH 89~ 58' 09" EAST 730.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. A PORTION OF SAID LAND BEING PARCEL 1 OF SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED JUNE 5, 1989, AS INSTRUHENT NO. 89-202498 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SIIOWN ON MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30.00 FEET WESTERLY AND 50.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTH O0" 14' 31" EAST, 597.60 FEET TO T]~E NORTII LINE OF A 40.00 FOOT WIDE 112 Order No. 9300992 -43 Page 2 DESCRIPTION EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, RECORDED FEBRUARy 19, 1936, IN BOOK 1117, PAGE 423, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 89° 52' 19" WEST, 730.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 14' 31" WEST, 599.14 FEET TO A POINT 50.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 89° 59' 32" EAST, 730.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS ALSO DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED JUNE 5, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-202498 OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL C: PARCELS 1 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4907, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 52, PAGES 54 AND 55 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THOMAS STREET AND VINCENT AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4907, AND PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8889, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 92, PAGES 46 AND 47 OF SAID PARCEL MAPS, AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 13 OF TRACT NO. 2244, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 35, PAGES 50 THROUGH 56, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 24, 25 AND 26 IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN ON MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS ON FILE IN BOOK 4, PAGE 9 OF SAID MAPS, ALL IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13 WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 60.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89° 22' 30" WEST 2560.46 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET IN THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 26 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4907; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89° 16' 01" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.16 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 44.00 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH 00° 06' 29" WEST 583.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 26 IN SECTION 13 OF CUCAMONGA LANDS; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89~ 24' 50" WEST 14.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 26; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 26, NORTH 00~ 06' 29" WEST 331.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8889; THENCE ALONG SAID PROLONGATION, SOUTH 89° 26' 02" EAST 14.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LAST MENTIONED PARCEL 1; THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES AND DISTANCES BEING ALONG THE WESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINES, RESPECTIVELY, OF SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL 1; THENCE NORTH 00~ 06' 29" WEST 1574.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 34' 48" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.94 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 89° 31' 41" EAST 2502.94 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89° 26' 19" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.46 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 00° 05° 22" EAST 914.09 FEET TO THE MOST EASTER~i3 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL I; DESCRIPTION THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID LOT 24 IN SECTION 13 OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, SOUTH 89" 28' 04" EAST 30.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 24 IN SECTION 13 OF CUCAMONGA LANDS; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS 24 AND 25 IN SECTION 13 OF CUCAMONGA LANDS, AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 IN BLOCK 13 OF TRACT NO. 2244, SOUTH 00° 05' 22" EAST 1008.59 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2 IN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-070578 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES, RESPECTIVELY, OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 2, NORTH 89° 24' 47" WEST 103.01 FEET, SOUTH 00° 05' 22" EAST 89.05 FEET, AND SOUTH 89° 24' 47" EAST 103.01 FEET TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 13 OF TRACT NO. 2244; THENCE ALONG THE LAST MENTIONED EASTERLY LINE,'~LSO BEING SAID WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 30.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13, SOUTH 00° 05' 22" EAST 505.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. A PORTION OF SAID LAND BEING PARCEL 1 OF SAID CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-070578 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL D LOT 27 AND LOT 30 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 27 LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 30, BEING ALSO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINES OF FOURTH ST. AND CLEVELAND AVE.; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 30 AND 27, BEING ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CLEVELAND AVE., 1166.10 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 27 AND 30, 1326.47 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDRY OF SAID LOT 27. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTH 27 FEET OF THE SOUTH 60 FEET OF SAID LOT 30; BEING MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE ~F SAN BERNARDINO AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1969 IN BOOK 7361 PAGE 683 OFFICIAL RECORDS. NOTE: THE AREA AND DISTANCES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ARE COMPUTED TO THE CENTERS OF THE ADJOINING STREETS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. PARCEL E: LOT 19 AND LOT 22 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, ACCORDING TO MAP OF CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF LOT 27 OF SAID SECTION 13, ACCORDING TO SAID MAP OF CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: 114 DESCRIPTION BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 30 OF SAID SECTION 13, OF SAID MAP OF CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS, BEING ALSO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINES OF FOURTH ST. AND CLEVELAND AVE.; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 30 AND 27, BEING ALSO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CLEVELAND AVE., 1166.10 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY ON A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 27 AND 30, 1326.47 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 27. NOTE: THE AREA AND DISTANCES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ARE COMPUTED TO THE CENTERS OF THE ADJOINING STREETS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. 115 Por. Cucomonga Fruit Lands M. B. Roncho Cucomonga Cily 209-;"' [ Tox Role Arao 150t5 A, 'E. G (Parcel A) I I I I (Parcel A) I0 (Parcel A) T, I IJL I I( Assessor's Map Bool~ 209 Poge 27 Son Bernardino County JI i Z .! ~ AC 4s~a¢ 20 Pot:. Cucamonga F~'uil Lands M.B. ,t/9 Pot:. Tract No, 2244. IVLB. 35/50-56 19 (Parcel D 22 (Parcel D ) 27 (Parcel E ) (Parcel E ) 30 419 ,j- kJ ,,.J °° J,t~_ · © Poc (~) 26 (Parcel C ) (Parcel C ) Parcel &lop No 9496. RAt. 102/Z-3 Foreel Mop IJo. 09,9~, P.M. 32/46-47 Roncho Cucomonga Cily Tax Rote Area 15015' -; .® (Parcel C ). 'p. ~A .92-146'47 (Parce] C ) Par. POE L (Parcel C ) LDI I Black 13 (Parcel C ) STREET :J-~ - Assessors Mop Book 210 Page OB Son Bernordino County 210-C: j '* TIIOhlA,~ k Par. 16 FOI~RTII Parcel ® @ 14 13: @ Por, 26 ® Par, 17 Par. Map No. 4907, PM. 52/54, 55 (Parcel C ) Poe. Pot. For. II I0 9 N Par. 8 / Z,5' Par,. 19 ..,f po Poc 25 Pof. Par, 20 zl J @ Par. Z2 Roncho Cucomongo City 210 ~,.~(, Tax Role Areo 15015 Pot'. T ,~ t~ STREET" Pan It Par. 23 Par. Par. '~ 6 5 PoL ~ 4 ® 5FREET don, 1980 Par. SE I1'~, Sec. I,.,'1, T..IS., R. 7W. Assessor's Iv, op Book 210, Page 36 San Bernordlno County EXHIBIT B GENERAL DYNAMICS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXACTIONS The Specific Plan Entitlelnent (collectively. "Exactions") consist of the following documents: City Council Ordinance No. 525 approving the Specific Plan 93-01 (Subarea 18 Specific Plan) Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Subarea 18 Specific Plan EIR, dated May 4, 1994, and prepared by Michael Brandman :Xssociates. Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-32 approving tentative Parcel Map 14647 119 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPRDVING SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 , T|FE SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) (ii) (lii) On January 26, February 23, and March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted meetings on the Specific Plan. On January 26, and continued to February 23, 1994, and on April 27, 1994, the Co~lssion conducted duly noticed public hearings on the related Environmental Impact Report. On April 27, 1994, the Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the recommended adoption of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, hereinafter referred to as the "Plan". On june 1, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the adoption of the Plan. The Plan comprises approximately 380 acres of land bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Mllliken Avenue, on the north by .the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue, ai'L as .referenced in the Conceptual Land Use Plan, Figure 4-4, ofjthe Plan. (iv) On file in the City Clerk's office, and incorporated herein by this reference, is a full, true, and correct copy of the Plan. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW ~{EREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council.has reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Plan, General Plan 93-02A and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 93-03 and certified the Report, including adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations~ in compliance with the California Environmental 120 "CITY COeICLL CRDINAHCE riO. ~. SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL D~|AfdICS June 1, {994 Page 2 Quality ~ct of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. Prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, this Council has adopted General Plan Amenc~nent No. 93-02A and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 93-03. This Council hereby finds tl]at the Plan has been drafted to include, in text and accompanying diagrams, all of the information as follows: a.., The distribution, location, and extent of the land uses, including open space, within the area covered by the Plans and The proposed distribution, location, extent, and intensity of major components of public and private trau%sportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential infrastructure proposed to be located within the area of the Plan and needed to support the land uses described in the Planl and de The standards and criteria by which development will proceed for lan~' uses within the Plan and standards for the conservaFion, development and utilization of natural resources, where applicable, within the area of the Planl and A description of the implementation: measures, including re~lations, programs, public works projects, and financing 'measures necessary to carry out those provisions referenced in subparagraphs a, b, and c above within the area of the Plan. . This Council hereby adopts Specific Plan 93-01, ~he Subarea 18 Specific Plan, on file in the City Clerk's office and incorporated herein by this reference, subject to each and every environmental mltigat~on measure set forth in full, in the "Mitigation Monitoring Plan" for the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific 18 Specific Plan EIR", and subject to the following conditionsl 1) ·'.Within 45 days of City Cou.c/1 approval, a revised '.-'.,i Plan text, Final EIR, and Mitigation Monitoring .Plan incorporating the changes required shall be submitted to the Community Development Director ,. for review and approval. Upon acceptance by the ~ Community Development Director, a total of 25 '..unbound, 3-hole punch, copies of these documents shall be submitted for distribution to the City Council, the City Clerk, the Planning Commission, and staff· In addition, one unbound original copy each, and one executable cop~ each, on a 3.5 inch computer diskette in a format acceptable to City, shall be submitted. 121 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL DYIlAMICS June 1, 1994 Page 3 2) A copy of Planning Commission Resolution NO 94129 and this Ordinance shall be included within the Plan text after the title page. 3) Utilities shall be undergrounded per Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96 , with the following understandlng~ a) 4th Street - The golf course developer'shall be responsible for undergrounding along the golf course frontage of 4th Street. Said undergrounding may be deferred until the development of Planning Areas V, VI, or VII, if secured by an in-lieu fee. b) 6th Street - The golf course developer shall be responsible for undergrounding utilities between Cleveland Avenue and the westerly boundary of Planning Area IX at the time of . the golf course development. c) A. T. & S. F. Rail Line - Utilities shall be undergrounded with the golf course development. -.. 4) The applicant shall prepare supplemental design guidelines to create a distinguishing character for the 380 acre project. The guidelines shall include unifying design concepts for entry statements, signage, and street furniture (e.g., lighting standards, bollards, benches, etc. i. The guidelines shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to the application for development of any planning area, except for the golf course. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San BernardinoJ and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to C&lifornia Fish and Game Code Section 711-4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino- In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game CITY COUIICiL ORDILIANCE ~10. SPECIFIC PLAN 93-01 - GENERAL DYI~A~IICS June 1, 1994 Page 4 Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR TIIE RANCIIO CUCA~IONGA IASP SUB-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN EIR State Clearinghouse Number 93102055 Submitted to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Contact: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner Prepared by: Michael Brandman Associates Carnegie Centre 2530 Red Hill Avenue Santa Ana, California 92705 Contact: Thomas E. Smith, AICP, Project Director Michael E. Houlihan, Project Manager May 4, 1994 Section 1,0 2,0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ..................................... 1 PROGRAM MANAGE~IENT ..................... . ........ 1 2, I Roles and Re,sponsibilitie,s ........................... 2,2 General Procedures ............................... 2 Attachment A Sample Reporting and Implementation Form JBIIg(}90001 .MMP 1.0 INTRODUCTION Section 21081.6 to the Public Resources Code requires a lead or responsible agency that approves or carries out a project where an environmental impact report has identified significant environmental effects to adopt a "reporting or monitoring program for adopted or required changes to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects." The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the lead agency for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan EIR. A draft environmental impact report has been prepaxed for this project and addressed potential environmental impacts and, where appropriate, recommended measures to mitigate these impacts. As such, a mitigation reporting or monitoring program is required to ensure that adopted mitigation measures axe implemented. The project is located at the southern boundary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is within the existing Industrial Area Specific Plan GASP). The project site is bounded by Fourth Street to the south, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the AT&SF railroad, and on the west by Utica Street and Cleveland Avenue. The proposed Sub-Area Specific Plan would include a broad mix of uses that could include a hotel/conference center, retail, restaurant, and entertainment, as well as office, research and development, and light industrial uses centering around an 18-hole golf course. 2.0 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT The mitigation monitoring plan (MMP) for the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan EIR will be in place through all phases of project approval. Enforcement of the MMP will be the responsibility of a Project Manager (I'M). 2.1 ROLES AND ~ONSIBILITIES: PROJECT MANAGER The PM is assigned by the Community Development Department Director. The PM assigned to the proposed project will supervise the MMP through all phases of project approval and is responsible for the overall management of the MMP. The mitigation measures identified in the MMP fall into two categories: 1. Measures that need to be satisfied prior to the issuance of building permits, and 2. Measures that axe implemented with subsequent levels of development through conditions of approval. The PM is thoroughly familiar with the project and qualified to determine if an adopted measure is being properly implemented. The PM oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting and Implementation (R&I) Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is being taken on each measure. The PM and/or an assignee will also be responsible for the filing and updating of the R&I Forms during all phases of the project. The PM will determine the need for a measure to IB~IgOg4X)Ol .MMP I 126 be modified and ensure the use of a mitigation specialist if technical expertise beyond the PM's is required. If it is found that an adopted mitigation measure is not being properly implemented, the PM would require corrective actions to ensure adequate implementation. The responsibilities of the PM include the following: An MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potential significant impact and its corresponding mitigation identified in the list of mitigation measures artached her.to. Appropriate specialists will be retained, as needed, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the PM. The PM and/or an assignee will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the PM and/or an assignee at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The PM is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the PM and/or an assignee. The completed form will be provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The PM has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of ~e MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The PM also has authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure artached hereto is not occurring. The PM also has authority to hold ~e issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 2.2 GgNERAL PROCEDURES MIVIP Program Definiliop. The MMP consists of key program elements. The definitions of these elements are summarized below. M1MP Files Files are established to document and retain records of the MMP. The file organization is established by the PM according to mitigation measures and project phases. R&I Forms R&I Forms are designed to record the monitoring activity in a consistent manner with appropriate approvals. The R&I Form is placed in the MMP files. A suggested copy of the form is in this program description as Attachment A. Environmenial Compliance Verification At the completion of construction contracts that are part of the overall development of the project, a verification of environmental compliance is executed by the PM. The verification concludes the construction monitoring process for the contract. Mitigation Monitoring Program Procedures The policies and prot:edures for the MMP described herein are intended to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines for monitoring the implementation of the mitigation measures discussed in the draft EIR. Table 1 lists each mitigation measure and the implementor, the responsible party for monitoring, and the timing of implementation for each mitigation measure for the proposed project. Table I also provides the PM a verification of compliance for each mitigation measure during each applicable phase of the project. An R&I form (s~ Attachment A) is prepared for each potential significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase. The PM shall initial and date the measure on Table 1. Program EIR A Program EIR has been prepared and certified for the Rancho: ducamonga Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan, within the meaning of 14 California Administrative Code Section 15168, and is intended to analyze and cover the project as a whole. Each discretionary project application within the Sub-Area Specific Plan area will need to include any and all initial studies and assessments required by CEQA. To the extent permitted by CEQA, no further environmental assessment beyond the Program EIR is considered necessary. In the event CEQA requires any additional environmental review, the City may impose ~dditional measures (or conditions) to mitigate adverse impacts which were not considered at the time the Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan was approved, and which are otherwise consistent with the provisions of any development agreement between the City and the property owner. Disposition of Monitorint, Forms All active and completed R&I Forms are kept in the MMP file with the City of Rancho Cucamonga during the pre-design, design, construction. and operational phases of the project. Reports will be available from the city upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead AgenCy) Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ,IBIIg(}9(XX)I .MMP TABLE 1 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation invent~ry of Mitigation M~asures in lie eolunms to lie right are lismd personnel/agencies responsible for implenmntalion for monitonng, rimrag, and compliance. Mi~ga~on me-__~.rgs arc fists! by topical area. Land Use and Plannine No feasible mcasures are avUlabic to ramgate lic removal of acUve grape vineyards from lie project talc, No olier miUgauon measures arc rcquired. Traffic and Circulation Assuming lint pot~nual r~ffic impacts occur u projected in ~hc traffic impact analysis, development widUn lie propor. cd Sub-Area Spccinc Plan rd~H complclc all bontagc improvements to ulUmatc gcomcmcs, u oudincd in lie City's General Plan and in accordance will the Development Agrccmcnk including all/ntcrscction mrnmg lanes. in addition, development shall contri- bute · traf~c fcc in accordance with the Ciiy's adopied Iraf~c unpact fcc program (Transportation Development liltpact Fcc 0rdinancc No. 445) as lic projcct's contribution to cfiyw~dc Responsible for implementor Monitoring' Timing N/A N/A N/A N/A Project Applicant City Engineer Prior to ~$suancc of building penmrs Vcriticalion of Compliance Signatorc Date N/A Footnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE 1 (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation Vcrificanon of Compliance cuculation improvemenu identi6cd u neccuary at thc limc of iuuancc of building permits. Thr.~ improvements my consist of mc improvcn~nts ducnbcd m SerAion 5,2.3 m the draft EIR. In the event thc trips gcncratcd f3'om buildout of Ihc project equal or exceed those projected in me traffic impact analysis and · rcponal Inflic impact fee has been established to allocate, on · ~au' share basis, the costs of new re:pond improvements necessary to accommc,,4u,- regional rafiic growth, at thc Umc of building permit issuance, thc braiding permit applicant shall bc required to pay its fair shuc of such rcgiond improvcmcnu in accordance No~f 2. Construction activity shall bc limiw. d to 6:30 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Samray, unless · permit for each work area ha lust been ismed by thc Director of Public Works, or no noise- sensitive reccptors would bu cxposed to thc consinaction noise. Implementor Project Applicant Project Applicant/ Grading PcrnUt CondiXon Responsible for Monitoring' City Engineer City Planner Timing Prior to issuance of building pt-rmits Concurrent with iuuance of grading Signature Datc gootnotcs are printed on page 21. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program MidgMion Mufflers on construc~on equipment and macks shall meet the manufactur=r's rccommende, d specifications for opera- Uon and mamachance. Development of the project siac shall bc in conformance witth the Performance Standards idsntilicd in the proposed Sub-Area Spcci6c Plan. Fixed ongomg outdoor activity areasI (i.e., eating arm) associated wi~ sructurcs on the golf course (i.c., golf course clubhouse) shall bc placed in arm with noise levels that do not cxcccd 70 dBA Ldn fzom combined mobile sources (vehicular and rail uaf6c) and staUonary sourcea (conuncr- cial and indusaziel acUvidu) unless macb outdoor arras arc shielded from the noise sources as necessary to oon- form with applicable Ci~ requirements. in addition, the clubhouse and any additional smacmrgs u> bc located within the golf course shall bc placed in a~cas with noise levels that do not cxcccd 65 dBA Ldn fzom combined mobile and stationary sources unless noise insulation feann~s arc included in the design to mcct applicable City and Responsible for impicmcntor Momtoring' Timing Project Applicant/ City Planner Concurrent with Grading Penrot isman~e of grading Condition !>urnits Project Applicant City Planner Project Applicant City Pltnncr Prior to approval of development plans Prior to approval of development plans Vctitication of Compliance Signature Dat~ Footnotes arc printed on page 21. TABLE 1 (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Miligaiion State standards. Convmional con- mucUon wieh windows closed smt f3uh air supply sysgsna or air condi6n,,ing will normsBy meet d`ue mandards. If the clubhouse or any addiUonai mruc- mrcs to bc iocagd wilin the golf course arc placed in an area arid, noise levels exceeding 70 dBA !.,dn, · de- tailed analysis of the no~c reduction requiremenu shaft bc magic and _~4___-.d noise insulaiion f_-.--,rgs shall bc included in the design. Any new onsitc commercial and indusmal development thal has the potential to gcncra~ outdoor noise levels thai cxcccd 70 dBA Ldn on fixed ongomg outdoor aclivity areas (i.e., eating arm) ,-soci..,,*d unth strdcmru on ,he golf courg (i.e., golf course clubhouse) shah conduct · dctailr, d noise impact analysis. Any acdve outdoor uses areas2 associa- p.d with office, commercial. and indurazial acUvitiu thai arc iocaicd in a~cas with noise levels thai exceed 75 dBA Ldn aaz requited to bc shielded fi'om the noise sources, by u~liTing sound barricr waits or srucmrcs ·cling as effective sound barnors, to insure con~onnancc with the City's noise sundud. Responsible for lmplemenmr Momtoring' Timing *Project Applicant City Planner Project Applicant City Planner Prior to approval of development plans Prior to approval of dcvclopment plans VerifcaUon of Compliance Signature Dale Footnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program MitigaUon Any new orm,- commacial and indus- oxen'J- 75 dBA Ldn on sclivc matdoor use areas associamt wkh office, commercial, and industrial activities shall conduct a detailed noise inspact analysis. Office, commercial, and mdusmal smscmrcs that are located in arm with combined noise levels thax exceed 70 dBA Ldn shah include noise insulation features in the de. sign m mGet City and Stslc slsndsrds. Convesmonal consmsction with windows closed ~nd fresh air supply systems or air condi- tiomng will normally meet these requirerights. if these smscturcs arc lot. aged in areas with combined noise Icyeli that exce. r,d 75 dBA Ldn, · detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements shah be made and needed noise insulation f_--__-~,rcs shah be mc|uded in the design. Responsible for lmpicmentor M onilormf Timing Project Applicant City Planner Prior to approval of development plans Project Applicant City Planner Prior to approval of development plans Verification of Compliance Signature Dale Footnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE I (continued) Ouslitv Mitigation General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program The foUowing SCAQMD ndl~gadon mcasurca have been incorpornted Ihe propoecd project. 'rneac nmanares cjn reduce emismom www~ei,led wi~h new developmcnL The majority of lhcsc measures are o~emed toward project conmucrlon or at lean more dclaiicd levels of plamung I~an is cislcd wi~h · speci6c pie ·mcndmcnt, Genera] Plan amendment, and zone change. The fcanbilqy and appropri- alehess of each mcardare can ben be de~mUncd az d~c tune of Development/ Design Review for the proposed Sub- Area Specific P|an. As such, the lowrag measures are rgcommcnclcd for future levels of project UopicmcmaUon, but only as de~.mod m bc feasible and appropnazc az ekat mac. TmUng and means of implcmcnmaon of mesc pcen~nl measurer~ are fur~cr dc, gribcd below: a, Use iow-c~mssion ai~crn~vc fuel (i.e., mclhanol, buumc, or propant) as practicable m mobile conslzuc- rion cquipmcnt (e.g., tractor, scraper, dozcr), Rcq~onsible for I mplementor Mom tarrag' Timing Project Applicant City Beer Project Applicant/ Director of Grading and Conunumty Builtling Pcrmit Development Condi6ons Prior to approval of development plato Prior to issuance of grading and/or building permiU, as applicable Verification of Compliance Signature ~'~otnoles are printed on page 21. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitiguion b. Develop · nip xr, duction pin achieve 1 .J AVR for constme6on cmployecs. c. Comply wilh SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 eonc~ning imple. me, maUon of dust mppre. mon w.~hmque. s prevent hgilivo dust furore creanng a nu~nc, offsi:~. d. Employ consn'ucUon ac6vity man- agement w, chmque~, ~uch u ext~nd- mg ~: con~ruclion period, duerag the number of pieces of equipment un~d nmuhaneously, mcr~aang :he dis:ante be~een emirsion sources, reducing or changing Ihe hours of conm~uction, and scheduling ac:ivity during off- peak houn? :. Suspend grading operalions daring Mzintain conslruc6on equipmcnt ¢ngines by ke, cpmg :hem Use Iow-suffur fucl for stationtry consU~crlon equipment. Responsible for implemcntor Morntoting· Timing Project Applicant Director of Prior m issuance of Community Failing pcrmits Dcvelopment Project Applicant Director of Prior to issuance of Commumty grading pcrmits Development Project Applicant/ Director of Grading and Conununity Building Pernuts Development Condi6ons Project Applicanl/ 'Director of Grading Permit Commumty Condi6ons Dovdopmcnt Project ApplicanU Direcsor of Grading and Community Builtling Pcrmit Development Conditions Project Applicant/ Director of Grading and Conunumty Buildling Permit Dcvciopmcnt Conditions Prior to issuance of grading and/or budding pernuts, as applicabic Prior to issuance of Prior to muancc of grading and/or building permits, as applicable Prior to issuance of grading and/or building permits, u applicabi: Verification of Compliance Signature Dat~ Footnotes are printed on page 2 1. 1o TABLE I (continued) h, jo General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation Use exiraing Po~r sourc~ (e.g., Power pole, s) or elm-fuel generators rather than temporary power generators. Use low-omission om~ e, quipmont (e.g., methane!-, propane-, or buune.powcrr, d imcroai combusUon enginci) ia~Icad of diesel or gaolme. Upon appiicauon m the City for Development/Design Review, the project developer shall subnut · si~c plato and such other ma~cnal u may be appropriag m ducnbc the TranslmnaUon Demand Mazaage- meal (TDM) program proposed for the project which is the subject of the specific development dclign review (no TDM program shah be required with respect m the golf course and rclaiP. d improvements). The TDM program will comply with the TDM Ordinance adopted by the CRy and will mc|udc an ilcmizadon of the TDM measures. Each TDM measure iacorponlcd into the project will misfy the requirements of the TDM ordinance and include csfmatcd mp reduction Responsible for implememor Momtormg' Proj~:t Al~liant/ Dinrotor of Grading and Commumty Building Permit Development Conditions Project Applicant/ Director of Grading and Commumty Building P~nnit Development Conditions Proj~t Apphcsm Dffex4or of Community Development Timing Prior to issuance of gnding and/or budding pc, traits, ns applicable Prior to issuance of grading and/or building pernUts, ns applicable Prior so approval of development plans Verification of Compliance Signature Dab: Footnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigatioa targets, pogmial fundinglimplengn- mion sources, bt,-,~fic-6on of individuals/age, miss ttspo-*able for monimring/implementa6.on, and the fining/phasing of implewemufon in rglalion to Ihc devtJopngnt of Ihe project sit~. In developing the TDM progrin, the project developer r, houid give conmdea6on to the following TDM me. am~s (without bmitalioa), a~ applicable: , The erabli~hment of onsit~ video conference facililics m of-flog parks which cmploy 1,000 !goplc or mor:. · Promolion of pcdcsl:rian circula- lion 10 conne/.J public slzr, ct~, parking arcu and public nantit f~cilibes with traildrags and · Ch-culalion syslcm dcmgn which reduces confiicU Igtwecn vehicu- lax and pcdcsuian anf~c. Responsiblc for Implementor Mornrating* Timing Verification of Compliance Signature Footnotes are printed on page 21. In/VQfI,Q~I~fil Iv4k~P 12 TABLE 1 (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Midgalion · IdcngflicaUon of murua~it improvemenU mw.h u bus ashel- as may be rcquirr. d by the City Engineer and ,ke City Plaane~ under the TDM Ordinance. · Transit lmkagu with the Ivlctro- link maUon m be developed within Parch ×. · insullauon of shower faciliUcs and btkc racks for use by persons w-lkmg or bicycbag to work. · Provision of off-su'cct paticing close to buildings for design,ur.d use by carpoots and vanpooLs. · PotcnUally locaUng rctad services w~hin or adjacent Io subject project. · Provision of off-site bicycle u'ads linking the facility to bicycle conunul~g fouws. · Provision of onsitc employee services such as cafeterias. banks, postal scrvicu, etc. · Scheduling of mack deliveries and pick-ups for off-peak hours. Responsible for implementor Momtormg" Timing Veri~ca~on of Comphancc Signamr~ Dale Footnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation The TDIvl program shall be subject to review by Ihe City Plaumcr or Pluning Com-'inion, as appiica- blc, in conjunc6on with Dcvdopmenl/Duign Review. 11. Require development practices that muimizc energy conscrvaUon pruequisitc to permit approval. 12. Improve the thermal imcgnty of buildings, and reduce the thermal load wiu~ automated nine clocks or occupant 13. in~oducc window g|a"nS, wall insula- Uon, and eflicim vcntfianon me~ods. 14, in~oducc energy-efficient heating and cooling appliances, such as wNcr hca/grs, cooking equipment, r~fzigcra- boiler umts. 15. use devices that minimize the combus- tion of fossil fuels. 16. C~pmrc wu't~ heap and rc-employ it in nonrcsidcn~d buildings. Re.q~on~ible tor Implementor Momtoring' Timing Project Applicant Dirgetar of Commumty Development Project Applicant Building Official Project Applicant Project Applicant Project Applicant Project Applicant Building O~cial Direcu>r of Building and Sircry Dirgctor of Commun.y Development Builtling Of~cial Prior to approval of dcvclopmr. nt plans Prior :o ismaancc of cenil~c-_,_es of occupancy Prior m issuance of bui/dmg pcnmzs Prior m issuance of certiticatu of occupancy Prior to issuance of Prior to issuance of building permits Veri6cation of Compliance Signature Dale Footnotes arc printed on page 21. 14 TABLE 1 (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation 17. 18, 19. I ,ndscupe building and median iand- scapg m with native drought- resistant speciu, u appropriauh m rcducc wauer consum!gion and m pro- vidc passive solar bengrits. Rr. quirg design feamru, operating procedure, s, prcvr, ntive= maimcnancc, openmr raining, and emergency response planning to prevent thc rcicuc of toxic polluxants, as appropria~. Ensure compliance with notfficaUon and asbestos remvd proccdmzs outimcd in SCAQMD Rulc 1403 to rcducc asbegos-~!-3_e~ air quality Unl~cts and hc, dth ha.z~zrd~. Earth Resources 20. Subject to such iUmta~ons u my be set forth in any appllcablc development agr~cmcnl, stnacmrcs to be consmac~d under the proposed Sub-Area S!~ci6c Plan r. ball be rgquircd to comply with aH local and mate development stan- dartis (grading permits, Alquist-Priolo Zone Act of 1972. Uniform Building Responsible for impiemcntor Monitoring' Timing Project Applicant Direr, mr of Prior to issuance of Conunumty building pernUts Dcvclopmcnt Project Applicant Project Applicant Proj~ Applicant Dh'cctor of Community Devclopm~nt BuRgling Official Building O~cial Prior to q~rov~l of developmorn plans Prior to dcmoliUon of cxisUng buildings Prior to issuaacc of building pcnnits Verification of Compliance Signature Dale Footnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE 1 (cominued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Verification of Compliance Mitigation 2 1. Prior to the issuance of · grading permit for developmint of · mucmrg, · subsurface geeo,~,,;,--I mveadgmion sbdJbccaduc~dtodesummedae likeShood of smmic vai-mcS sad the mbje, ct suucn~. Findings of this invemgalion shall be submitw, d to dme City and grading opexa6ons droll adhere m the recommrw4-6ons idemifi~l in the geo.-~b-i--~ report. Hvdrolotv/Drainate and Water Oualitv SUmJar to clcvclopmcnt thaz wou~d bc aUowexi on the pro~'t mto under the cnsUng IASP, various norm dram mspfovcmeats w~l ~ rosalied, as devdopmcm of the proposed Sub-Aru Spgg~c Ptsa progr. uu, to convey the pom-dgvciopmem otmtc aorta flows into the existing storm drain facilidu adjacent to the site. The proposed monndrainfaciliticswillbcm-r-daad |oc, m~ to con/orm to the City's current storm flow conveyance policy. Responsible for lmplcmcnmr Momtormg' Timing Project Applicant Building Official Prior to issuance of gr~mg~ City Engineer Prior to approval of development plans Sigmaure Date Footnotes are printed on page 2 1. 16 TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program verilical~on of Compliance Miligation Prior to the iuuanc, of · grading permit for dcveJopmcnt of Mmcmru, erosion conUol mcamaru that include Bm Managemont ~ (BMPs) and complianc~ with National Pollution Digbarge Elimination Sys~m (N PDES) rdormwaw, r quality rcquircmcnts shah bc included within consu'uaion plans. Biolotksl Resources Responsible for lmplemenlor Momtoring' Timing Project Applicant Director of Prior to issuance of Commumty gsmtmg igsmits Development N/A N/A N/A N/A No mgni6cant impacts on biolopcal resourccs will result Jrom consreaction of the project silo; therefore, no mitigaUon measures ue rccommct~'--a- for biological resources on~iu=. Publk Services and Utilities 24. All toiick shower, and faucet fixtures Project Applicant Building Official Prior to approval of shall b~ of an "ultra low-flow' nature. _ buildmS permits 25. Onmte landscaping shall usc water- Project Applicant City Planner Prior to approval of conserving plant malP=riaJ. building permits 26, Automalic landscaping irrigation Project Applicant City Planner Prior to issuancc of systems shall bcuscd, ccaxificatcs of occupancy 27, AUlomadc shut-off faucets shall be used Project Applicant Building Official Prior to a~provd of in of~ccrdcommcrcid/rctail facilities, building permits Signature Dltc N/A %otnotes are printed on page 2 1. ,1 TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Miligadon 28. Landscaping sd imgauion symsms shall bc designed ~o ~onserve wa~r d~fme, d m Chap~z 19.16 of lt~ Cucamonga Municipal Code. 29. Sindie to dl devciopmeat within CCWD, Ihc developmeat of the Sub- Area Specific Plan would requirg payment of fees in accordance with ~hc CCWD wuacwa~cr faciliey fee program. 30. Thc project applicant shai/ irapicture · source re. ducl~on and recycling program for the proposed Sub-Aru Spcci6c Ftan which may include the following: Provide recycling facililies that allow paper, metal, plutic and glus Io bc Compost green waste, spe, cilically green wulc from Ibc proposed golf goufi~. · Use minime/nminlcmmcc planU for landscaping. Ruponsible for lmplcmcntor Mommrmg' Timing Project Applicant Director of Prior to approval of Commumty building permits Development Building Ol:ficial Director of Community Development l~or to issuance of a builtling permit Prior to appmvtl of developmat plane Veri~cation of Compliance Signature Footnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE I (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitig~ion 31. Prior to issuance of building pcrmiu, development impact fees in accordance Mth Cucamonga School Disuict and Charley Joint Umon High School Disuict shall be paid. These dove!- opment i~q3act f~es shall not exc_~e_~_ maximum mount per r~luarc foot as set forth in Sm~ Assembly Bill (All) 2926. No smUganon measures arc required; how- ever, the following mensum arc proposed to minimizc overall energy consumpnon. 32. in order to conserve energy, individual developments on the project site shall incorporate energy efficient Itchnote- rues, pracUces, and sqmpment m reduce the onsi~ demand of electri- city, natural gu and fuel. 33. Implementalion of the project shall comply with Tiide 24 of the Califorma Unitotto Building Coat. Rcsponmblc for Implementor Momtormg* Timing Project Applicant Building Official Prior to issuance of building p~rmits Project Applicant Project Applicant Building Official Buiidmg Official Prior to issuance of ccrtificaucs of occupancy Prior to issuance of buildings permits Verification of Comphancc Signature Dal~ Fc, otnotes are printed on page 21. TABLE 1 (continued) General Dynamics - Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigalion HSzardous Material, 34. Du¢ to fits Sub-Asia $pcciAc Plan's beneficial ~ r'_t''''a m tits onsi~ pottmial thrut of k,,, _,,~,_,, comminmon, mmum m addition to the ~xisting local, mat, and federal has mat~mls regulation,/ requiremeats and guidtlmes ar~ not nee~d. Re4q>onsibie for Implementor Momtoring* Timing Verification of Compliance Signature N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Footnotes are printed on page 2 1. TABLE 1 (continued) General D namics Rancho Cucamonga Sub-Area Specific Plan - Mitigation Monitoring Program y - Mitig~ion N/A - Not applicable. Verification of Compliance Responsible for Implementor Mommrmg' Timing Signature D~c · A project manager assigned by the Community Development Director will oversee monitoring of all miUgation mc,uures. e Fixed oneoine ouldoor activity areas - Throe outdoor saTas rolasc to ectivifes such as eating areu that arc usuciated with structures on the gotf course such as the goU course clubhouse. a Active outdoor uses areas - Outdoor ectivc use areu uaociat~ with the proposed of6cc, conuncrcitl, and industrial uses are areas where peapie congregate and remain for cxlcndcd periods of lime. s Off-peak Irafile hours - Off-peak traffic hours refers to the hours m a 24-hour period with the lowest hourly volumes of measured traffic. Convcrscly, peak traflic hours arc those hours which have the hiehut Ira~c volumes. Typically, there are two peak pods in · 24-hour period, an a.m. peak and a p.m. peak. Though peak and off-peak traffic hours may vary by location or jurisdicl~on, gcncrally a.m. peak hours occur bezwccn 6 to 9 a.m. and p.m. peak hours are f~om 3 to 6 p.m. Therefore, off-peak rafiic hours would generally occur between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. and between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. 4 Development practices that maximize energy conservation - Speci6c examples of devclopmcnt practices that tpatlmi?c energy conservation may include, but arc not lureted to the following: · Use of central water hesUng systems · incorporanon of ra~adc trees on southcan and western side of buildings Io reduce builtling heal~g/cooling needs · Use of double-paned glass windows · Use of light-colored roo6ng and f_,,-,~a_, malgriaJ~ Io reflect heat · Increased wail and amc insulation beyond Tide 24 requirements Waste hut - Wang heal refers to ghc heat energy byproduct ~ my be given off by various healing/cooling equipment or various manufacturing processes. Examples of capturing and rc-empl.oying wasac heat include: Co-generation of energy whereby the was~ heat from hearing/cooling a building is captured and used Io heat wau:r for that or another budding. · Modi~ing industtiai/numufactuting proceuu Io cr,~__-_,_- cio~.d loop syslen~, whereby wuge heat produced as n re. suit of one process is used as a source of heat energy for anothu. ATTACItMENT A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM REPORTING AND Ii~IPLF_2,1ENTATION FORM 147 RANCHO CUCANIONGA IASP SUB-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM I~i~PORTING AND I~VlPLEMENTATION FORM Project File: # Mitigation Measure: # Location: Onsite Impact Issue: Land Use and Planning Noise Earth Resources Biological Resources Energy Description of Activity/Method of Implementation: Disposition: Comments/Revisions: Phase: # Offsite Traffic and Circulation Air Quality Hydrology/Drainage and Water Quality Public Services and Utilities Hazardous Materials Mitigation measure for the above-noted project phase implemented. No further action is required. Mitigation measure for the above-noted project phase is not fully implemented. Further action required.' (Please explain below) The mitigation measure for the above-noted project phase is not in compliance. Further action required. (Please explain below) Completed by: Name: Title: Date: Approved by: Name: Title: Date: JBIIgOqOOOI .MMP A-I 148 RESOLUTION NO. 94-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 14647, BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY FOURTH STREET, ON THE EAST BY MILLIKEN AVENUE ON THE NORTH BY THE A. T. & S. F. (METROLINK) RAILROAD, AND ON THE WEST BY CLEVELAND AVENUE AND UTICA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07 AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 14647, submitted by General Dynamics, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 15 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APNs 209-272-01, 04, 07 and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26, bounded on the south by Fourth Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A. T. & S. F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 1994, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, this Commission has reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan 93-01, including analysis of this parcel map, and, by separate resolution, recommended that the City Council certify the Report, including adoption of a Statement of Overriding Consideration, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder. SECTION 2: Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, this Commission has reviewed and recommended approval of Specific Plan 93-01, General Plan Amendment 93-02A, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, and recommended adoption by the City Council. SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Environmental Impact Report, Specific Plan 93-01, General Plan Amendment 93-02A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the proposed Subarea 18 Specific Plan, together with all written and oral reports, this Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-32 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14647 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 2 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements contemplated will not conflict with public easements for access through or use of property within the subdivision. The findings, facts, and conclusions referenced in the resolutions recommending adoption of Specific Plan 93-01, adoption of General Plan Amendment 93-02A, adoption of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, and certification of the Environmental Impact Report are hereby incorporated by reference. SECTION 4: Tentative Parcel Map Number 14647 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: En~ineerin~ Division In the event a Development Agreement is adopted by the City Council, which addresses the phased installation of infrastructure improvements, that agreement shall supercede all applicable conditions, including all applicable standard conditions· Utility Undergrounding shall be completed upon redevelopment, development, or future subdivision of parcels with frontage on each of the following: ae The existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for the 66KV electrical) on the project side of Fourth Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Utica Avenue to the first pole on the east side of Milliken Avenue prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The existing overhead utilities (electrical) on the south side of Sixth Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Cleveland Avenue to the end-of-line pole on the west side of Milliken Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 34-32 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14647 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 3 c. .The existing overhead utilities (railroad communications and electrical, except for the 66KV electrical) on the project side of the A. T. & S. F. Railroad right-of-way shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east side of Milliken Avenue to the first pole off site west of the west project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the right-of-way. The area fronting the Metrolink site shall be the responsibility of the Metrolink property. de An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of Sixth Street shall be paid to the City prior to redevelopment on Parcel 2. The fee shall be one- half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Utica Avenue to the end of line pole on the west side of Cleveland Avenue remaining after Condition 1.b is completed. In addition to the perimeter street dedication requirements listed in Standard Condition A.2, the Final Parcel Map shall include the following dedications: a. Streets "A," "B," and "C" serving Parcels 9, 10, 14, and 15 as shown on the tentative map; b. The knuckle between Cleveland Avenue and Seventh Street; Ce An additional 12 feet at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Sixth Street, transitioning to zero across Parcel 8, approximately 600 feet west of Milliken; de Intersection right turn lanes to the satisfaction of the City Engineer with the following lengths: 590 feet at Fourth/Milliken and Sixth/Milliken and 390 feet for all other street intersections with Fourth, Sixth, and Milliken Avenue; and e. The entry monument at the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Milliken Avenue. Upon development of the golf course and driving range (Parcels 1, 3, 12, and 13), public improvements shall be completed as follows: ae Install missing street Standard Condition B.3, Parcels 1, 3, 12, and 13, knuckle· improvements, as indicated in for all frontage streets of including the Cleveland/Seventh 151 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-32 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14647 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 4 be Widen the existing pavement on the north side of Sixth Street to provide two westbound traffic lanes across adjacent Parcels 9 and 11. ReconstrUct the Sixth Street median break to eliminate the eastbound left turn pocket and landscape the median, from Cleveland Avenue to a projection of the east property line for Parcel 1. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement from future development for median landscaping and pavement north of the Sixth Street centerline, not fronting Parcel 13. e. Install street lights on the south side of Sixth Street fronting Parcel 8. f. Underground all frontage overhead utilities of Parcels 1, 3, 12, and 13. g. Construct the City entry monument at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Fourth Street. he Reconstruct Cleveland intersections at Fourth and Sixth Streets as driveways or private streets with right turn lanes. The Sixth Street driveway shall align with a future centerline shift in Cleveland. Vacate Vincent Avenue, Thomas Street, Cleveland Avenue between Fourth and Sixth Streets, and a portion of Cleveland Avenue north of Sixth Street while providing the following: ae Provide easements for all existing utilities including the public storm drain, 12-inch water line, and 6-inch gas main. Provide a surface drainage easement to accommodate QiO0 in the event of blockage in Sixth Street catch basins· be Record CC&Rs and a letter of negative covenant to replace a public street with a private fire lane, to the satisfaction of the Fire District· c. Convert existing street lighting system to private responsibility. Immediately upon their vacation, Cleveland Avenue, Vincent Avenue, and Thomas Street shall be removed from public use. Existing utilities within Thomas and Vincent shall be abandoned as directed by the affected agencies· Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Sixth Street· The Developer shall be eligible for fee credit toward, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the 152 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-32 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14647 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 5 10. 11. 12. 13. Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City policy. If the Metrolink project has secured these improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, this condition shall not be imposed. Parcels 7 and 8, fronting Milliken Avenue south of Sixth Street, shall reimburse the City for the cost of installing the median in accordance with City Council Resolution 89-574 upon development or further subdivision, whichever occurs first. Upon development or further subdivision of Parcel 8 or 9, shift the west side of the Sixth/Milliken intersection southerly about 12 feet to align the Sixth Street centerlines. The centerline transition shall be approximately 600 feet long. A contribution in-lieu of construction shall be provided to the City for the future reconstruction of Fourth Street pavement, to the centerline, fronting Parcel 1, prior to Final Parcel Map approval. Prior to development or further subdivision of Parcels 6 or 7, or redevelopment of Parcel 5, the 1988 Pavement Rehabilitation Study shall be updated. The findings of that study shall be implemented across Parcels 1 and 5 and prior to redevelopment on Parcel 5, or across Parcels 1, 6, and 7 upon development or further subdivision of Parcels 6 and 7. Upon development or further subdivision of Parcel 11, Cleveland Avenue north of Sixth Street shall be reconstructed as a local industrial street, with the centerline crown shifted westerly 10 feet and the east side widened 12 feet. Provide a drainage easement across Parcels i and 13 in favor of Parcels 3, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, and 15 and the public street systems therein. Provide an agreement covering all flows entering the easement from the Metrolink site and public streets to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney. Said agreement shall provide for, but not be limited to, maintenance and liability to be the responsibility of the property owner, and include provisions, in the event the property owner is negligent in said maintenance, that the City has authority to enter and maintain at the property owners cost. Storm Drainage Facilities for the entire study area shall be included in the Final Drainage Study a. Facilities shall be designed for Q100 as follows: (1) The golf course drainage channel shall be sized to accommodate flows from streets "A," "B," "C," and future streets within Parcel 9, but not from Sixth Street, and shall have appropriate erosion control. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-32 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14647 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 6 (2) The interim golf course detention facility shall accommodate the ultimate build out of the area, including the drainage area of the Fourth Street storm drain. The spillway of the detention facility shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner and the City Engineer. (3) Inlet facilities at the intersection of Sixth Street and Cleveland Avenue shall intercept a Q100 storm. The existing Storm Drain within Cleveland Avenue shall receive Q100 flows from areas upstream of Sixth Street and Cleveland Avenue. (4) QiO0 fully developed flows reaching the intersection of Fourth Street and Cleveland Avenue shall not exceed Q100 for the existing undeveloped condition. (s) The Fourth Street storm drain shall accommodate QiO0 for the drainage area to the north and be sized to include the south half of Fourth Street. Laterals shall be stubbed for future connection of catch basins by the City of Ontario. The Fourth Street storm drain shall connect to the existing open channel in the City of Ontario. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will assist the Developer in obtaining the permit for the work in the City of Ontario. b. Installation may be phased as follows: (i) Install drainage facilities with the golf course (across Parcels i and 13) to accommodate parcels 9, 10, 14, and 15. Provide desilting facilities for interim inlets in Parcel 9. (2) Extend the inlet facilities at the intersection of Sixth Street and Cleveland Avenue as needed to accommodate street improvements. (3) Install drainage facilities to eliminate surface flows across Sixth Street at Milliken Avenue with the first development phase. (4) Facilities serving Parcels 6, 7, and 8 shall be installed upon development or further subdivision of said parcels. (5) Upon development of the Fourth Street storm drain and its connection to the channel in Ontario, the golf course detention facility shall have its outlet control reconstructed to eliminate the detention facility. 154 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-12 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14647 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 7 14. UpOn development of any parcel fronting Fourth or Sixth Street, a parkway beautification master plan shall be developed which expands upon the existing designated street trees. 15. Chino Basin Municipal Water District owns and operates the non- reclaimable sewer which lies within an easement on the north side of this map. As Chino Basin Municipal Water District is a public agency servicing the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the developer of the subdivision shall be responsible for any relocation, modification, or construction on this system required due to the development. Such work shall include, but not be limited to, adjusting manholes to grade, realignment of lines to allow other utilities to be constructed, and other similar construction. If any modification or adjustment to District facilities is desired, plans shall be approved by the District before proceeding. 16. Easements which are no longer necessary shall be abandoned, including City slope easements adjacent to Cleveland Avenue. 17. Upon redevelopment or reuse of Parcel 2, obtain the necessary right-of-way and construct sufficient widening on the west side of Utica Avenue to bring the total pavement width to 36 feet. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement from future development for improvements west of the Utica Avenue centerline. Plannin~ Division Provide a reciprocal parking agreement between the golf course/driving range and Parcels 2, 4, and 5 to accommodate overflow spectator parking for professional golf tournaments. This approval is contingent upon City Council approval of Specific Plan 93-01 (Subarea 18 Specific Plan), certification of the related Environmental Impact Report, and approval of related General Plan Amendment 93-02A, and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03. Buildin~ and Safety Provide minimum 60-foot side yards between all existing buildings and adjacent property lines or provide non-buildable side yard easements on adjacent parcels in order to achieve compliance with the wall and opening protection requirements of Chapter 5 of the Uniform Building Code for unlimited area buildings. SECTION 5: This Resolution shall be effective upon the effective date of an Ordinance of the City Council approving Specific Plan 93-01, General Plan Amendment 93-02A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 93-03, and the Resolution certifying the Environmental Impact Report. 155 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. )4-i2 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14647 - GENERAL DYNAMICS April 27, 1994 Page 8 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 1994. BY: I I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co~nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April, 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: NONE 156 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TZNTATIv. PARC-L .AP NO. 1'/'~7 Those items checked are Conditions of ApproVal. A__~. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the 8. All existing easements lying within future right-of- City for all interior public streets, community way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the final trails, public peawoe, public landscape areas, street parcel map per City Englneer's requirements. trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map, Prlvate easements for /9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local placed outside the public right-of-way shall be feeder trails, etc.) shill be reserved as shown on the dedicated to the City. plans and/or tentative map. /10. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of- shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted way for the perimeter streets (measured from street the final parcel map. centerline): ~3 [~77C/4 1. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated total feet on along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet Zq total feet on/~-lfV~'Z/I~/~> AJ/O (J~TAf measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent -- -- sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel (~# 7~I street tree easement shall be provided. /a~r] total test on /' lUlI(,LI,I"F'A,J Af~b ]MIIMgIVAyS OAJT) q'lllf, (#,/M, MICLIKeN total feet on (/Mf"tlee ~i~kf~l$ .. 12. The developer shall make a good faith effort tu acquire the required off-site property interests --~ ~,Ve,,~/) n.c...ary to construct the req.i red pub l,. improvements and, If he/she should fail to do so, the 3. An Irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway developer shall at least 120 dave prior to submittal purposes shall be made for the prlvate streets. of the final parcel map for approval, enter into an M/f agreement to complete the Improvements pursuant to 4. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City CIty Standards. acquires the property interests required for the - improvements. Such agreement shall provide for 5. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the for the following streets, except for approved City to acquire the off-site property interests openings: required in connection with the subdivision. Security ~ ~s~ ~ } I~t~ for. port,o. of th.se costs shall b. In t~e ~orm tFl{ ~ I l~ a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal _~ 6. Reciprocal access easements ensuring access tq/Meiwlw report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by ~he City F~tsslt shall be provided by CCaR's or deeds and shall prior to commencement of the appraisal. Thx~ be recorded prior to or concurrent wlth the fins] condition applies in partlcu]ar, but not ]lmlted, to parcel map. ~ttet,s z, sq, s"&lz- 7. Reciprocal parking agreements for ~'I Fmesal~ and maintenance agreements ensuring Joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, landscaping, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. 1 B_= ~reet Improvements 1. All public improvements {interior streets, drainage J4. facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas,etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, delve approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. A minimum of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40-foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. Construct the following missing perimeter street improvements including but not limited to: STREET NAME H(llike. q'Tl.l CURIa aC IC!- DRN( NT ll~RIT Ca MEI~AN lee GURUS PYre WaL~ e L~INTI ~RREI TRa~ ~LAND ~ OTHER c, e v' v' d Notes: ( a ) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvlllnear per STD. 114. (d) If so marked, an ln-ll u of construction fee shall be provided fo this ttem)~ a , b o c , e , /r2 / ¢ 7 g, h , Improvement plans and consrEutErs2 Street improvement plans Including street frees and street lights, prepared by a registered Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being Performed In the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Englneer's Office in addltlon to any other permits required. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and Interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed on any new construction or reconstruction of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR. ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pullrope. Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as dlrected by the City Engineer. Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upo~ completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall Installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. Street names shall be approved ~ Planner prior to submittal for first 'he CIty check, eat improvement plans per City Standards for all prlvate streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall b· paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office In addltlon to any other permits required· Street trees, · minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the CitW's street tree program· Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Zngin··r for confor·ance with adopted policy. /~V7 A signed consent and waiver form to Join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Llghting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respect lye Beautiflcmtlon Master Plan: t41ctlKeN/ ve u - On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including drivmways. I&mlls, signs, and slopes shall b· located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b , Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improy·d, usually by moving the 2+/-closest street trees on each made away from the 8treet and placed in · 8treet tree easement. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: All publlc Improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prlor to the issuance of building permits: C. PUblic N~&ntenance Areas A separate met of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final parcel map approval. The following landscaped parkways, medlan8, passes, easements, trails, or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 1,114 5 .eer Meb/ lAI A,,Jh F unf. y Mo u,4e4r fa rH,/HII, LIKEAJ D. Dralnaas and ,lend Control The project (or portions thereof) is located wlthln a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered CIvil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone .. designation removed from tile project area. The developer's englneer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologlc/hydraulx, calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revislou (CLOHR) shall be obtained from FEW^ prior to final parcel map approval. · Letter of Hip Revislon shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy Improve·ant acceptance, whichever occurs flrst. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the CIty Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. All drainage facilities shall be Jamtailed ms required by the City Engineer. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance au,! disposal of surface drainage enterlag the property from adjacent areas. A permit fro· the County Flood Control DIstrict required for work within its right-of-way. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured frum the outer edge of · mature tree trunk. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows In the event of blockage in a bump condition. ~= z-prove.eat Co.pl.tlon fl/~) / Y~ Y 7 If the requlred publlc Improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an Improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the Clty w111 be required for: If the required publlc Improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placedupon the Final Hap stating that they will be completed upon development for: /q'N D L~' ) } Utilities V/1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanltary sewerage system, water, gas, electrlc power, telephone and cable TV (all underground) In accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provlded as required. Hater and sewer plane shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Mater Dlstrlct (CCMD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DIstrict, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San BernardInn. A letter of compliance from the CCND ls requlred prlor to flnal parcel map approval. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other laterested agencles Involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be recelved from them· The developer shall be responsible for the relocstlon of existing utilities as necessary. G. General Requirements and approvals The tentative map approval Is valid for the 24 month period following the approval date. Time extensions r be granted by the Planning Commission, If sted prior to the expiration date. __.8, V/IO, FInal gradlag plans for each parcel shall be as required by the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading permits. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R'S) approved by the City Atto'~ney Is required prior to. approval of the final parcel map. An easement for a Joint use driveway shall be provided' prior to final parcel map approval for: Prior to approval of the final parcel map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment DIstrict*ill - I among the newly created parcels. Ztlwanda/San Sevalne Area Regional Halnline, Secondary Regional and Hastar Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final parcel map approval. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for .ork .Ithi. their right-or-..:/'VI, dD,CE. HWP / A signed consent and waiver form to Join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be flied with the CIty Engineer prior to final parcel sap approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. Prior to ftnallzatlon of any development phase, sufficient Improvement plans shall be completed beysand the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tenetstire map. Pursuant to provisions of California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action Is flied and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San BernardIns; and (2) any and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the 'aunty or Bernardins. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and conformed copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. pr . , In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 11. Prior to recordsalon of the final parcel ·ap, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of · Hello-Ross Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school dlstrlct has previously established such · Community Facilities DIstrict, the applicant shall, In the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project slte lnto the territory of such exlstlng dlstrlct prtor to the recordsalon of the flnal parcel map. Further, tf the affected school dtstrict ham not formed a Hello-Ross Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordsalon of the final parcel map for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. 12. Thls condition shall be waived If the Clay receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered lnto an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. ~13. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Malls-Room Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DIstrict to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The statlon shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection DIstrict, and shall become the Dlstrlct's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District In accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all application laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordeaton of the final parcel map occurs. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the~w~ty, covering the estimated cost of operating al~A;treet lights durXng the first six months of operation, prior to final parcel map approval. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 6, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMI'NDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25 acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file: General Plan Amendment 94-01A. ~ECOM~DATIO~ The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Community Plan Amendment through the adoption of the attached Ordinance. The above-described application is a follow-up to General Plan Amendment No. 94-01A, which was approved by the City Council at their meeting on June 15, 1994. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendment on May 11, and continued it to May 25, and June 22, 1994, so that the applicant could revise the design guidelines and related graphics to address their concerns. These concerns included the architecture along Church Street, preserving a view corridor from Foothill Boulevard, and pedestrian connections. The Commission then conducted special workshops on May 25, and June 8, 1994, to review the changes made to the text and graphics. On June 22, 1994, the Commission recommended approval of the proposed amendment to the City Council. Attached are copies of the Planning Commission's Minutes and Staff Reports dated May 11, May 25, and June 22, 1994. At the workshop on June 8, 1994, the Commission agreed to expedite the processing of the Conditional Use Permit application for the proposed project, specifically, the major anchor tenant, Best Buy. The Commission will be conducting a design review workshop for the proposed project on July 13, 1994, and considering the project for approval on July 27, 1994. Brad Buller City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Minutes dated May 25 and May 11, 1994 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Reports dated June 22, May 25, and May 11, 1994 Resolution No. 94-57 Ordinance of Approval 162 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting May 25, 1994 Chairman Barker called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:02 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman Barker then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David Barker, Heinz Lumpp, John Melcher ABSENT: Larry McNiel, Peter Tolstoy STAFF PRESENT: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announcements. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: .Moved by Melcher, seconded by numpp, carried 3-0-2 with McNiel and Tolstoy absent, to approve the minutes of April 27, 1994, as amended. Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Lumpp, to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of May 11, 1994. PUBLIC HEARINGS Ae ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25 acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file: General Plan Amendment 94-01A. (Continued from May 11, 1994) Because the Commission would be adjourning to a Pre-Application Workshop with respect to a related development, City Planner Brad Bullet recommended that the item be continued to the first meeting in June. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Commissioner Melcher felt the community plan should be to revised to consider the design and planning objectives for the subject parcel as it relates to all of Foothill Boulevard and Church Street and the applicant should then craft a project plan to fit the amended community plan. Motion: Moved by Melcher, seconded by Lumpp, to continue Environmental Assessment and Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01 to June 22, 1994. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER NONE MCNIEL, TOLSTOY -carried Be VARIANCE 93-05 - SiS PARTNERSHIP - A request to increase the sign area for the Project Identification Monument Sign from 24 to 49 square feet; increase the sign area for the Tenant Identification Monument Signs from 24 to 49 square feet; and increase the maximum number of tenant names on the Tenant Identification Monument Signs from three to five per face, for Thomas Winery Plaza, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208-101-22 through 25. Related File: Amendment to Uniform Sign Program No. 88. (Continued from May 11, 1994) Fe AMENDMENT TO UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 88 - SiS PARTNERSHIP - A request to amend the Sign Program to allow a Project Identification Monument Sign, internally illuminated Tenant Identification Monument Signs, and various changes to the sign criteria for Thomas Winery Plaza, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208-101-22 through 25. Related file: Variance 93-05. (Continued from May 11, 1994) Chairman Barker commented that staff had received a request from the applicant to continue the matter to June 22, 1994. He opene~ the public hearing. Kevin McConnell, Signs & Services, 10980 Boatman Avenue, Startton, stated he is the applicant and had requested a continuance to June 22 instead of June 8 because he was scheduled to be at a City Council meeting in another city on June 8. He said that City Council had since postponed his matter to June 22. He aske~ if Items B and F could be heard on June 8 instead ~f June 22. Brad Bullet, City Planner, commented that the June 8 agenda is already very full and he etated that the matter had originally been scheduled to be heard on May 11, but the applicant had requested a continuance to tonight's meeting. Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 25, 1994 ~irman Barker observed that =he vote had already been taken and =he project ~een approved. Me asked Mr. Tohey if he had con=acted staff regardin se · application for his wall so that the Commission could col matter. Mr. Tohey he had not. Chairman Barker ,nded he should talk to staff. Mr. Tohey stated the would be 6 feet high on wall is on the p line. He said the wall )rtiz side but 4 feet high on his side. Commissioner Lumpp noted reached between the two nei< block be placed between the pil~ informed that an agreement had been Me observed it had been suggested that Mr. Tohey said that would Chairman Barker sai, there is a change would not need to arn to the Commission unless Mr. Bullet s staff would need to review the plans · wall. Chairma with as stated that Mr. Murphy would tell Mr. Tohey proceed variance on his own property, process building permits his with the Ortizes, or appeal this decision if he should chose do PUBLIC HEARINGS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01A - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A proposal to amend the General Plan Land Use Element Map to change the land use designation from Office to Community Commercial for 25 acres bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east APN: ~ 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01. ENVIRONMENTOr. ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25 acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east - APNz 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration· Related file: General Plan Amendment 94-01A. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report regarding General Plan Amendment 94-01A. Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 11, 1994 Commissioner Tolstoy noted the area immediately to the north of the project site is designated as Medium Residential with High Residential to the west of the Medium. He asked if there had been any consideration regarding changing the Medium Residential and whether Medium would be appropriate adjacent to Community Commercial. Mr. Warren replied there had been no consideration of changing the designation to High Residential. He thought the development standards should be able to accommodate any negative impacts and noted that if the adjacent property were changed to High Residential, that would mean that more people could be impacted. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated that when the original General Plan was laid out, the buffer appeared to be in land use stages from Commercial to Office to Residential. He noted that since that time, a majority the street frontage of the northern property has been changed to a Park designation. He said that it is not unusual to have Residential adjacent to Commercial. Commissioner Tolstoy noted concerns have previously been voiced regarding Neighborhood Commercial being adjacent to Residential. Mr. Buller remarked that generally those concerns deal with Low Residential single-family developments rather than Medium Residential projects. Commissioner Lumpp asked if the applicant had prepared air quality and traffic analyses. Mr. Warren replied that the applicant had provided a detailed project analysis and prepared the Initial Study and staff completed an air emissions inventory utilizing the California Environmental Quality Act handbook. He noted that all emissions were determined to be under the permitted increased emission amounts. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, commented that traffic analyses are based on peak hour trip generation figures. He stated staff had compared the Commercial uses to the previously designated Office and Professional uses. He said office uses tend to have concentrated peak hours of opening and closing whereas a Commercial use generally opens in the morning and generates trips throughout the day until closing in the evening. Commissioner Lumpp aske~ if additional traffic studies would be requested when the individual projects are submitted. Mr. James replied additional traffic analysis would be required regarding internal circulation and local access from Spruce, Church, and Elm Avenues because an office park would typically have an office in the center with parking evenly distributed around the center and access being. more evenly distributed onto the surrounding streets whereas there would be limited access from Spruce because of limited parking available in the rear of a commercial center. Planning Commission Minutes -3- May 11, 1994 Commissioner Lumpp asked if a more detailed analysis and modeling would be required when the applicant submits a specific project. Mr. James replied more detailed analysis would be required but no modeling would be required because there are no regional concerns. Me said the applicant had already met with the traffic engineer to determine what would be required. He said =here may be concerns regarding stacking on Spruce Avenue at Town Center. Commissioner Lumpp asked if an action on the General Plan Amendment would mean the Commission was also taking action on the marketing analysis. Mr. Buller replied that the analysis was provided only as background material. Commissioner Lumpp recalled that when Urban Research Associates prepared a marketing study for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, they reported there was no need for any additional Commercial. Me noted that the applicant's study indicated there is a demand for more Commercial and the City's consultant appeared to agree that more Commercial would be appropriate. He asked what had changed since the initial report. Mr. Warren replied that when the initial study for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan was completed, the City was just starting to see a great increase in residential build out and the comparison was to other cities in Southern California. Me said that the second study took into account the tremendous residential growth which had taken place, not only in Rancho Cucamonga but also in surrounding cities, and concluded that additional Commercial could be supported. Mr. Buller stated the market study provided by the applicant indicated there is a market for specific types and sizes of users that is missing in Rancho Cucamonga. He said the applicant is trying to focus on those needs. Commissioner Lumpp said he was glad to see that Mr. Young had modified his thinking on the need for additional Commercial. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report regarding Terra Vista Community~ Plan Amendment 94-01. Commissioner Lumpp questioned if the City should designate the width for the landscaped area bisecting the site, Me felt "wide" was too ambiguous. Ms. Fong replied that staff felt that should be determined when a specific project is submitted. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Gary Luque, Western Land Properties, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, stated their original intent had been to submit the conditional use permit application in time to have a workshop with the Commission before the hearings on the general plan and industrial specific plan amendments. However, he said there had been significant changes to the project and they hoped to have a Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 11, 1994 workshop as soon as possible. Mr. Luque said that when the project was first approved as Office/Professional, 600,000 square feet of office buildings had been planned from two to six stories high. He stated that the northwest corner of the project is below the street grade and he said there will be significant landscaping to mitigate the effects to the residential property across the street. Me said they had been approached by specific users to build the buildings they now propose so they feel the project is viable. Rick Mager, Western Land Properties, 1156 North Mountain Avenue, Upland, stated they had developed Tetra Vista Town Center in several phases over many years with approximately 503,000 square feet completed to date. Me said the the pad buildings currently under construction are leased and there is a vacancy factor of only 5 percent in the entire project. Me stated that the smaller stores are less desirable than larger shops in today's economy. He said they were requesting the fezsting in order to reinforce the market share of Terra Vista Town Center. He felt it would augment the center and make it a stronger commercial complex. He presented a letter of intent from Best Buy Electronics for a 58,500 square foot store which they wanted to open on November 11, 1994, in conjunction with other stores in California. Me stated that they propose building approximately 225,000 square feet in phases with the first phase of approximately 100,000 square feet to be completed and open by March 1995. Me said they had received commitments for all but 6,000 square feet of the first phase. He felt the new project would generate an additional $50 to $60 million in sales per year. He stated that Project Manager David Newsome, Senior Marketing Manager Paula Dempsey, and Paul Vogel, President of Realty Development Research, were available to answer questions. Commissioner Melcher noted Mr. Mager had said he hoped to reach about $100 million in sales at Town Center with the 503,000 square feet. Me asked how the new center of 225,000 square feet could then be expected to do between to $60 million. Mr. Mager said that Best Buy currently does approximately $20 million in each store that they operate with the average store size less than 45,000 square feet. Me said this new store will be approximately 60,000 square feet and should generate approximately $30 million in its first year of operation. Paul Vogel, President of Realty Development Research, Inc. 542 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois, stated they had prepared a study in 1990 which they updated in November 1993 and March 1994. He presented a company brochure and a memorandum which briefly reviewed the analysis prepared by the City's consultant. Mr. Vogel stated that even when using the lower numbers generated by the City's consultant, there is still a current deficiency of 400,000 square feet of Co~s~ercial space in the City. Commissioner Melther noted that the City's consultant concluded that the additional Commercial space should be devoted to a limited number of types of retailers. He asked if Mr. Vogel agreed with that premise. Mr. Vogel did not agree, but felt there is a need in the total department store type merchandise area. Planning Commission Minutes May 11, 1994 Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Commissioner Melcher noted that the original design concept for the corporate park was to have open landscaped areas within the site providing a view into the community. 'He noted that Church Street is a ma3or thoroughfare and would now likely look onto a more solid back side of a commercial center. He preferred to have the topic addressed at the Commission level before acting upon the community plan amendment. He did not object to the use and favored proceeding with the General Plan change. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the change makes sense but he noted that the City has a number of small businesses in the community that are hurting and he feared adding more Commercial space of larger users would hurt the small businesses even more. He also noted that the Masi project also added Commercial uses along Foothill Boulevard and the City seems to be doing patchwork planning rather than following the plan the City has in place. He thought the Commission should take a good look at the additional Commercial property still available to be developed and the rest of the designations along Foothill Boulevard to determine what other uses might be appropriate. He thought this particular application makes sense but he wished the City could tell the developer to trade this additional Commercial for another site already designated as Commercial so that new Commercial property would not be added. Commissioner Lumpp felt the general plan amendment is appropriate based on staff's analysis. He agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy that areas in the community are suffering but he was not sure that prohibiting a project such as this would help. He thought users will relocate more readily in today's economy leaving older centers with less business. He felt the design standards section of the community plan amendment should be further reviewed before approval. He particularly felt that "wide" landscape area should be better defined. Chairman Barker felt the pubZic votes with their purchasing power and the small shops are a victim of the way people shop. He thought that people shop where it meets their needs, whether it be for cheaper goods or a wider selection, and they will continue to shop where it meets their needs no matter where tha~ particular store may be. He said the City is now starting to have a wider selection of stores. He did not think turning down this application would save the smaller stores which are hurting. He supported the General Plan amendment. He echoed Commissioner Melcher's concerns regarding the view from Church Street as he felt it appears to be a giant alley behind the project and he wished to see a little more detail before recommending approval of the community plan amendment. Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, to recommend issuance of a negative declaration and adopt the resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 94-01A. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NONE MCNIEL -carried Planning Commission Minutes -6- May 11, 1994 Mr. Bullet stated that the applicant would like to fast track the project because of their commitment to Best Buy. He suggested that the Commission could take action on the concept but defer acceptance of the text regarding streetscape design and how the project fronts onto Church Street. Commissioner Melther felt the Commission could cooperate with the applicant in continuing to move towards the applicant's long range objectives as they work through the project. He felt the community plan may have to reflect the actual development more than predicted. He thought the comments that had been offered tonight were in an effort to help to shape the project. He suggested the community plan amendment and the project move forward together. Chairman Barker agreed that he would prefer not to come up with language before seeing what is proposed. He wanted to be sure his concerns could be addressed. He again opened the public hearing. Mr, Mager stated he had worked in the City for almost five years and he felt their track record speaks for itself. Me said they were committed to working with the Commission as partners to satisfy its concerns relative to the streetscape and other aspects of the project. He noted they have significant time constraints with regards to the Best Buy. Me suggested changing "wide" to "significant," which he felt is a stronger word. Me acknowledge~ that the Commission's concerns were valid. Me observed that the Commission will have to approve every proposed building and he requested that the Commission move forward with the conmnunity plan amendment. Chairman Barker acknowledged that each building will have to be approved by the Commission, but he felt uneasy with the sketch which is included as an exhibit to the community plan. Mr. Bullet noted that since the Commission had =aMen action on the General Plan Amendment, that portion could go forward to the City Council without action on the community plan amendment. Me. Fong stated the applicant had only last week submitted new design plans and she anticipated the project could not come before the Commission until the second meeting in June. Mr. Bullet noted that the Community Plan Amendment would require City Council approval whereas the Conditional Use Permit would not need to go to the City Council unless appealed. He suggested the matter be continue~ for two weeks to try to address the concerns regarding the exhibit and text. Ms. Fong suggestet a pro-application review of the project preceding the design review of the actual project. She thought that would give an advance look into the project design. Commissioner Melcher thought the City and developer have enjoyed a long relationship in development of the project. He felt the developer could proceed on the development plan and act on goc~l faith that the City would approve the plan when the Commission's concerns are satisfied. Me noted the applicant could be in plan check with the working drawings before the City Council finalizes the change to the community plan. Planning Commission Minutes -7- May 11, 1994 Mr. Bullet said that would be correct with the consent of the Building Official. He suggested the matter be continued for two weeks to allow staff and the applicant to work on addressing the concerns. Mr. Luque felt the actual project and the community plan are tied together and he supported the pre-application workshop suggestion. Chairman Barker asked if the Commission could have the pre-application review prior to the next Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Bullet felt that could be accomplished. Commissioner Melcher felt that could be a workable solution because he thought a pre-application review may result in the development of sufficient changes to the community plan. Chairman Barker noted that the hearing was still open. Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, to continue Environmental Assessment and Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCMER, TOLSTOY NONE MCNIEL -carried VARIANCE 93-05 - OAS PARTNERSHIP - A request to increase the sign area for the Project Identification Monument Sign from 24 to 49 squ. the sign area for the Tenant Identification Monume from 2 49 square feet; and increase the maximum number of names on the Identification Monument Signs from three to per face, for Thomas Plaza, located at the northeast corner Foothill Boulevard and Vine~ - APN: 208-101-22 throt 25. Related File: Amendment to Un Sign Program No. 88. OLD BUSINESS AMENDMENT TO UNIFORM SIGN 88 - OAS PARTNERSHIP - A request to amend the Sign Program to a Project Identification Monument Sign, internally illuminated T .fication Monument Signs, and various changes to the sign .teria for Winery Plaza, located at the northeast corner Foothill Bou 'd and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208-101-2 ~h 25. Related file: ~riance 93-05. Chairman Sa. 1994· Me noted that staff was requesting a the public hearing· There were no .tinuance to May 25, MaXchar noted that the staff report had not yet be heard when the item is returned· heard and Planning Commission Minutes -8- May 11, 1994 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jun~ 22, 1994 Chairn~n and Members of the Planning Con=nission STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25 acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Con~nunity Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Staff recon~nends ~ssuance of a Negative Declaration. Related file: General Plan Amendment 94-01A. (Continued from May 25, 1994) BACKGROUND: The above-described application was continued to this meeting so that the applicant could address the Commission's concerns with the design guidelines in the Comunity Plan that pertain to the site and to revise the conceptual site plan accordingly. At the May 25 and continued June 8, 1994, pre-application workshops, the Co~nission reviewed the revisions to the design guidelines and the illustrative site plan and found them acceptable. The Con~nission also stated that the final design of a development project at the site will be reviewed through the Conditional Use Permit process. SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The following changes were made to the design guidelines, the graphics, or illustrations as directed by the Con~nission based on the May 25, and June 8, 1994 workshops. No additional changes are being proposed for the other parts of the Co-~unity Plan Amendment which are described in the attached Staff Report dated May 11, 1994. Access and Comunity Gateways: Figure IV-64 (page IV-49) was modified to delete the access point from the graphics, consistent with staff recomendations and as shown in Exhibit "AS." The proposed change is acceptable. Site Planning and Pedestrian Network: The proposed design guidelines on page IV-50 of the Community Plan and as shown in Exhibit "A9" are acceptable. Co Landscape Treatment: The proposed design guidelines for the site as described on page IV-51 of the Community Plan and as shown in Exhibit "A10" are acceptable. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA 94-01 - WESTERN LAND June 22, 1994 Page 2 Con~nercial Park: In response to the concerns raised by the Co~nission, the applicant modified the design guidelines as described on page IV-57 of the Cormhungry Plan and as shown in Exhibit "A13 and A14." The design guidelines were strengthened by adding language to address the Church Street streetscape, the view corridor from Foothill Boulevard, and the open space. Staff finds the changes to the design guidelines acceptable. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~nends that the Planning Commission adopt the antached Resolution, thereby recon~nending that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve the proposed amendment. Respec lly su ' ed, BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Proposed changes to the Con~nunity Plan Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated May 11, 1994 Exhibit "C" - Planning Comission Staff Reports dated May 11 and May 25, 1994 Resolution of Approval Draft Ordinance 173 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 25, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Bullet, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25 acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill 'Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Related File: General Plan Amendment 94-01A. (Continued from May 11, 1994) BACKGROUND: This item was continued to allow the applicant an opportunity to address the Commission's concerns with the design standards for the Church Street frontage between Spruce and Elm. A special workshop is set for May 25, 1994. Staff will present an oral report at this meeting. The Community Plan Amendment can be considered at the same time as the related development project (Conditional Use Permit 93-49) because it does not have the same time constraints as a General Plan Amendment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission either continue this item to June 22, 1994, so that the applicant can refine the proposed design criteria in the Community Plan; or, if the Planning Commission concludes from the workshop that the applicant has successfully addressed the Commission's concerns and has presented alternative language and exhibits for the Community Plan, approval of the attached resolution would be in order. Respe y sub ' d, Brad City Planner BB:NF:gs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Staff report dated May 11, 1994 Resolution of Approval Proposed Ordinance DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 11, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COb~4UNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25 acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Con~nercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Related File: General Plan Amendment 94-01A. BACKGROUND: This amendment request is a result of the related General Plan Amendment to change the land use for the above-described site from Office to Commercial. In addition to the proposed land use change, the applicant is requesting to modify various parts of the text and the graphics in the Design Guidelines (Chapter IV) of the Community Plan, that apply to this site. These changes are needed to establish the identity and the character for the development of the site in the future. ANALYSIS: This section of the report describes the proposed changes to the Community Plan followed by a brief comment or analysis from staff. The proposed changes are as shown in the attached Exhibits "A" and "B." For clarity, text changes are underlined while graphic changes are clouded. Land Use Change: Modify the Land Use Plan, Figure III-17 (page III-23), by changing the land use designation for the site bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Church Street, Spruce and Elm Avenues from "OP" Office Professional to "CC" Community Commercial. Modify the text and the graphics in the Co-~ercial Land Use section pages III-26 and III-27, describing the intent and the arrangement of the commercial uses. Modify the Land Use Summary, Table III-2 (page III-32), by changing the distribution of the gross acreage by land use types. (Exhibits "A-l" to "A-5"). Staff Comment and Analysis: The analysis of the proposed land use change is in the separate General Plan Amendment (GPA 94-01A) staff report. If the Commission decides to reco~nend the proposed "Commercial" use for the site to the City Council, then the appropriate zoning district of "Community Commercial District" should also be reco~mnended, for consistency purposes. The proposed text and graphics changes are acceptable. PL~uNNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES May 11, 1994 Page 2 Design Guidelines Changes: Chapter IV of the Comraunity Plan, Design GUidelines, describes the identity of the different con~nercial centers along Foothill Boulevard and sets the design flavor and character for each one. The following sun~arize the proposed changes to various parts of the Foothill Boulevard Centers Concept section of the Design Guidelines as they pertain to the site: Center Identity and Specific Uses. Change the use of the site from "Corporate Park" to "Con=nercial Park" ( page III-48 ) as shown in Exhibit "B-2." Staff Con~nent and ~a~alysis: The proposed change is acceptable. Access and Com~unity Gateways. Modify Figure IV-64 (page IV-49) by adding a primary access point on Fc~3thill Boulevard midpoint kM~tween Spruce and Elm Avenues and adding a Type III Gateway at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and EL Avenue, as sho~rn in Exhibit "B-3." Staff Con~nent and Analysis: The proposed addition of a prima~y access point showl~ by an arrow s~n~33ol on Foothill Boulevard implies an opening to the existing median island. ~.n opening to the median island at this location would require an amenc~ent to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Since the applicant has indicated that they are not requesting an opening in the median island, staff recou~nends that the arrow symbol be deleted from Figure IV-64. The addition of Type III Gateway is acceptable since the northwest corner of Elm Avenue and Foothill Boulevard is a terminus for a gTeenway trail. Site Planning and Pedestrian Network. Modify the site planning and pedestrian network design concept by describing the arrangement of buildings, parking areas, and pedestrian walkway for the proposed Commercial Park Center, as shown in Exhibit "B-4." Staff Comment and Analysis: Because of the proposed commercial land use, the site planning and pedestrian network is changed to be si~ilar to the concept of the existing Town Center. Staff recommends adding language to emphasize large open space with a defined pedestrian spine that traverses the site from north to south. The design of a development project at this site will have to create centralized and large open spaces that will enhance the "window" effect (i.e., views into the community and the mountains). Landscape Treatment. Modify Figures IV-65 and IV-66 as well as the Design Guidelines (pages IV-51 and IV-52) describing the landscape treatment concept for the Commercial Park, as sho~n in Exhibit "B-5." 176 PLANNING COMMISSDDN STAFF REPORT TVCPA 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES May 11, 1994 Page 3 Staff Comment and Analysis: The original concept for the Corporate Park was to have open landscaped areas within the site creating a "window effect" for providing a view into the community as well as a visual relief of the commercial development along Foothill Boulevard. Staff recommends that the proposed design criteria needs to be strengthened by adding language to state that large landscaped open space areas will be provided, as shown in Exhibit "B-5." Commercial Park. Modify Figures IV-70, IV-71 and IV-72 and the design criteria (pages IV-57, IV-58, and IV-59) by changing the graphics and the design guidelines to reflect a commercial development, as shown in Exhibits "B-8" through "B-10." Staff Comment and Analysis: The proposed language on page IV-57 expounded the design guidelines as described in the above sections "Foothill Boulevard Centers Concept." The proposed graphics include an example of a conceptual site plan and conceptual views of the design character for the development of the site to illustrate the intent of the design guidelines. Staff recommends that the proposed design criteria for the north-south pedestrian spine be strengthened by adding language to ensure wide, open space landscaped areas, as shown in Exhibit "B-8." C. Miscellaneous Changes in the Community Plan: Other graphic changes. As a result of the proposed land use change, a number of figures as listed in Exhibit "C" will be modified since they use the Land Use Plan as a base for the graphics. Staff Comment and Analysis: incorporated by reference. Acceptable, as the changes will be Overview of various commercial centers along Foothill Boulevard. Modify Figure IV-67, page IV-53, by replacing the "Corporate Park" with the proposed "Commercial Park" concept. Staff Coment and Analysis: incorporated by reference. Acceptable, as the changes will be Discrepancies on the balance of the Community Plan. In reviewing this proposed amendment, staff found that changes from previous amendments have not been incorporated into the Community Plan, such as, the "Multi-family Development Standards" adopted on September 11, 1991. Staff Comment and Analysis: Staff recommends that a condition of approval be placed requiring the applicant to bring the document up to date and submit a master copy to the City within 60 days from the date of the final approval of this amendment. 177 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TVCPA 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES May 11, 1994 Page 4 Environmental Assessment: The proposed land use change for the 25 acres of vacant land as described in the title of this report and the various text and graphics changes to the Con~nunity Plan will not have a significant effect on the environment. However, a project level environmental review should be required at the first development application to ensure the development of the site in the future will not have a significant impact to the environment. Staff recon~nends issuance of a Negative Declaration for the proposed amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan and the Terra Vista Comunity Plan. The proposed amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This proposed amendment has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution, thereby recommending that the city Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve the proposed amendment with the modifications noted in the staff report. Resp~c~d, City Planner BB:NF:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Proposed Land Use Change Exhibit "B" - Various Changes to the Design Guidelines Section of Chapter III Exhibit "C" - List of Graphics with the Related Land Use Change Resolution of Approval Ordinance 178 RESOLUTION NO. 94-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE WEST, CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM AVENUE ON THE EAST AND TO AMEND VARIOUS TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63. A. Recitals. 1. Western Land Properties has filed an application for Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 94-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Heroinafter in this Resolution, the subject Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 11, 1994, and continued to May 25, and June 22, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded duly noticed public hearings on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on May 11, May 25, and June 22, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2S acres of land, bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Spruce and Elm Avenues, and Church Street and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office Professional; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Park and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Community Commercial District and is developed with a shopping center. The property to the east is designated Financial, Restaurants, Residential and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Industrial Park Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is partially developed with a hotel. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TVCPA 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES June 22, 1994 Page 2 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Coasaission~ and, further, this Conaission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Coewniseion finds as follows= In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Comilsion during the public hearing, the PLANNING COnMiSSiON RESOLUTION TVCPA 94~01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES June 22, 1994 Page 3 Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 94-01, per the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ~J~D ~a3OPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE 1994. I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: B/~R, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS z NONE 181 ORDINANCE NO. 5~ ? AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 , AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTH ILL BOULZVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE WEST, CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM AVENUE ON THE EAST AND AMENDING VARIOUS TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63. A. Recitals. 1. On May 11, 1994, and continued to May 25, and June 22, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings with respect to the above-referenced Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 94-57, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 94-01. 2. On July 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to adoption of this Ordinance. 3- All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: A) That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommended approval of the Community Plan Text Amendment hereinafter described to the City Council. This City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B) That this Community Plan Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) That this Community Plan Text Amendment is consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 182 CITY CCUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. TVCPA 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES July 6, 1994 Page 2 D) That this Comunity Plan Text Amendment will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: A) That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. B) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753-5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rencho Cucamonga hereby approves Tetra Vista Community Plan Amendment 94-0~ as referenced in Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION 5: Within 60 days of City Council approval, a revised Tetra Vista Community Plan, incorporating the changes required shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval. Upon acceptance by the City Planner, a total of 25 bound copies of the Plan shall be submitted for distribution to the City Council, the City Clerk, the Planning Commission and staff. In addition, one unbound original copy, and one executable copy on a 3.5-inch co~uter diskette in a format acceptable to the City, shall be submitted. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rencho Cucamonga, California. This amendment #7 to the Tetra Vista Plan is proposed to change the area between Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue, Foothill Boulevard and Church Street from Office Use to Community Commercial uses. AMFNDFD PAGFS IN TFRRA VI-~TA COMMUNITY PLAN Land Uses Figure II1-17, the Land Use Plan (page 111-23, is hereby replaced with revised page 111-23, included in this document. Pages 111-26 and 111-27 are hereby replaced with the revised pages appearing in this document. The =statistical summary" is hereby replaced with revised page 111-32 appearing in this document. Design Guidelines Pages IV-48, IV-49, IV-50, IV-51, IV-52, IV-53, IV-57, IV-58, and IV-59 are hereby replaced with the revised pages appearing in this document. Pages IV-47 and IV- 54 are unchanged but are included for clarity. Ancillarv Graphics The following graphics of which the Land Use Plan is a base are hereby amended by reference to reflect the same changes made in Figure III-17 (revised page 111-23). · Figure II1-1 · Figure 111-8 · Figure II1-12 · Figure III- 15 · Figure II1-16 Terra Vista Plan Neighborhood Park and Greenway System Circulation Plan Suggested Transit Plan · Figure IV- 1 · Figure IV-8 · Figure IV-23 · Figure IV-41 Landscape Plan Likely Location of Edge Treatment along Major Arterials Greenway System Design Features Street Intersections with Greenway and Trails · Figure VI-2 · Figure VI-3 · Figure VI-4 Density Distribution Plan As Built Land Use Progress Plan As Built Density Distribution Plan Figure IV-67 panorama of Foothill Boulevard is hereby amended by reference to reflect changes in Figure IV-70. Miscellaneous Any discrepancies between the balance of the Community Plan and the content of this Amendment are to be based on the intent of the Amendment. (Revised 3-3-941 : \ P. C* ~'/[?~ z z/v7 FIGURE II1-17 Land Use Plan RE~IEMENTIAL LM Low MEDI.IM Di:N541y (4-8 DU ACI MH MEINLiliI'II~IX~N,~iTY (14-241)UAC) COMMERCIAL MIXED USE PUBLIC & QUA~-PUBL.IC _._ E ELEIIWTARy SCHO(X ,~?_'~ ~N ASSOCIATES Density Ranges of Approved Projects may vary slightly from the Plan; See "As Built Land Use Progress Plan" - Figure VI-3 on page V1-11. TIJ Pc_- P.c. I REVISED Anlendment No. 1, 2, 5. 6 & 7 I1' Variety of Densities Within All Neighborhoods, Each neighborhood in Tetra Vista has a mix of housing types, varying from single-family detached to multifamily housing, allowing people from many income groups and of differing lifestyles to live in Terre Vista. While the neighborhoods differ in character, no neighborhood is entirely higher density or entirely lower density. Commercial Land Uses Commercial land uses in the Terre Vista planned community are grouped in centers according to functional requirements to create convenient, efficient, and visually pleasing environments. Most commercial centers are situated between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street {Figure 111-21}; however, neighborhood and other smell commercial centers can be found elsewhere in the community to serve the more localized and specialized needs both of community residents and of residents in adjoining communities. The various commercial land uses in Terra Vista include: · Community Commercial · Neighborhood Commercial · Recreational Commercial · Office Park Community Commercial (CC). The Community Commercial parcel at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue can accommodate department store development, numerous tenant stores arranged around either an open or enclosed pedestrian mall, and community-oriented service establishments such as drug REVISED Anmndmenl No. 1, 5. 6 & 7 111-26 ' Commercial · Office · Entertainment · Commercial · Office · Entertainment FIGURE 111-21 II · Offices · Banks · Savings & Loans · Offices · Residential · Commercial · Medical · Residential · Hospital · Office · Medical Related Facilities · Commercial Centers Concept Along Foothill Boulevard stores, supermarkets, financial institutions, and other functions. In addition, the Community Commercial center can have entertainment facilities and/or restaurants. The intent is that the Community Commercial parcel will cater to a mix of uses that will make the development lively well into the night, to function as an active "people place" in service to the residents of Tetra Vista and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A more detailed description of the Community Commercial parcel in terms of design guidelines is provided in Chapter IV. The Community Commercial parcel on Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues will complement the uses found in the Community Commercial parcel to the west. Many of the same uses now found in the parcel to the west, such as restaurants, ouporrnor4e~e, community- oriented service establishments and offices. as well as other community-wide tenants requiring large floor areas_~'_' such as electronic stores can be accommodated on this parcel. "T'V~C ~ Neighborhood Commercial {NCI. Two neighborhood commercial centers are specified in the Terra Vista Community Plan, one at the southeast corner of Millikan Avenue and Base Line Road, and another at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. The purpose of these centers is to provide sites for markets, drug stores, laundromats, dry cleaners, and other neighborhood shops and services. Their locations make both centers easily accessible by automobile from all parts of Terra Vista via the loop parkway, while offering exposure to residents in adjoining communities. The centers are near to extensions of the greenway system for easy access on foot and by bicycle. In addition to the two Neighborhood Commercial centers, some local shopping uses are permitted within the Recreational Commercial site near the Millikan Avenue greenway underpass, and at the southeast corner of Church Street and Orchard Avenue (MOC parcel). Convenience commercial uses may occur elsewhere as discussed in Chapter V. RecreRtion-I Commercial |RC). The recreational commercial center site is near the geographic heart of Terra Vista, adjacent to Millikan Avenue and Church Street. Facilities that will be developed on the site will cater to a combination of indoor and outdoor, recreation-oriented activities. These may include racquetball courts, a golf driving range, batting cages, a miniature golf course, tennis courts, health clubs, pro shops, swimming clubs, outdoor-oriented restaurants, lounges, health food stores, athletic equipment sales and service, and other functions. The location near the primary greenway spine (and Millikan Avenue undercrossing) makes the facilities especially conducive to Terra Vista residents' jogging or cycling to the recreational commercial center, rather than driving. In the same vein, the presence of public parks and parkways adjacent to the center allows joint use of the public open space. In this way, team sports and spontaneous recreational activities will be fostered -- available to the public, regardless of residence in Tetra Vista. Also, as noted above, the site can also accommodate some local commercial facilities. Office Park {OPI. (;)ffice Park sites are present north of Town Center Drive. The concept is that these Office Park parcels can attract professional and corporate tenants to Rancho Cucamonga by offering high-quality buildings in a landscaped, pedestrian-oriented environment with numerous amenSties at close hand. Ideally, many of the people populating these office developments would also live in Terra Vista, allowing them to walk or cycle to work. A smaller Office Park site, intended for professionals serving the local area, is planned at the southwest corner of Millikan Avenue and Base Line Road. Business Park Overlay Zone, Subject to approval of a CUP, the Business Park Overlay Zone may be used in any area otherwise zoned for office use. The purpose of the Business Park Overlay is to provide for multi- tenant projects fostering small business development. Small business users typically require a combination of office and limited storage area, with the office use expanding, over time, to fill most of the building area; for this reason, parking requirements for Business Parks shall be the same as for office parks, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. REVISED Amendre/hi No. I. 3. 5. 6 & 7 Table 111-2 December 31, 1989 LAND USE SUMMARY Revised March 7, 1994 Amendment #1, #2, #3, #5, #6 and #7 Revised to Correspond to Land Use Map (Figure II1-17, _m 111-23) Midrange Number of LAND USE DESIGNATION RESIDENTIAL Low Medium Density (4-8 DU/AC) Medium Density (8-14 DU/AC) Medium High Density (14-24 DU/AC) High Density (24-30 DU/AC) Subtotal (Residential) COMMERCIAL MIXED USE3 Community Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Office Park Recreational Commercial Mixed Use4- Financial, Commercial, etc. Mixed Use4 - Medical, Office, etc. Mixed Use4 - Office, Commercial, etc. Subtotal (Commercial/Mixed Use) Gross Dwelling Units/ Dwelling Acres Gross Acre Units {AC) (DU/AC) {DU) 310.3 6 1825~ 300.1 9 2700 114.5 19 2118 54.7 27 1477 779.6 8120 101 .! 26.0 36.4 9.7 16.8 21.0 41.9 252.9 Estimated Estimated Persons/ Number of Household Persons 3.43 6,259 2.582 6,966 1.52 3,219 1.53 2,259 18,703 QUASI-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC5 Hospital Schools Central Park (Proposed by General Plan)* Parks and Trailse Special Landscape (Loop Median) Flood Control/Recreation Subtotal (Quasi-Public and Public) 10.0 46.0 99.2 51.9 4.9 12.4 224.4 MAJOR HIGHWAYSe 64.1 TOTAL REVISED Anmndrnent No. i. 2, 3, 5, 6 & 7 III- 32 ! ,321.0 8120 18,703 j~:/~ t-ll , ~,i I' ,' ~ ') FOOTNOTES FOR STATISTICAL SUMMARY TABLE 111-2 It is assumed that a portion of the land shown in residential use will be developed in community uses through the process described elsewhere in this plan. For this reason, 6.4 acres of Low Medium Density and 3.0 acres of Medium High Density which appear on the Land Use Plan are excluded from the residential dwelling calculations on the previous page. Household size for Medium Density residential is an arithmetic average based on the estimated distribution of types of dwellings to be built, See Chapter VI of the Terra Vista text, Descriptions of commercial land uses indicate the general type of development considered, Actual permitted land uses are enumerated in Chapter V of the Terra Vista text, Commercial acreages in Mixed Use parcels exclude residential uses, estimated to total 6.5 acres of High Density, 18.8 acres of Medium High Density, and 9.9 acres of Medium Density residential. Specific locations for community uses are not determined by this plan because the site size and location desired will vary depending on the user. However, it is estimated that 9.9 acres not included in the tabulation of public and quasi-public acreage will be developed in community uses. See Note 1 above. Major highways acreage includes half-width rights-of- way for Foothill, Haven, Rochester, Base Line east of Milliken, and Milliken north of Base Line*, and full- width rights-of-way for Milliken south of Base Line and Base Line west of Milliken. With density bonuses a total of 9,338 units are permitted in Terra Vista. Park and trail acreage of 51.9 shown on the Land Use Summary and Land Use Plan (pages 111-23 and IV-15) exceeds the 47.86 acre requirement (56.06 acres per page VI-3 less 8.2 acres private open space credit per the Park Implementation Plan) by approximately four acres. Trail widths and locations may change slightly as developments proceed through the planning process, and a portion of the park land shown on Milliken Avenue may be converted to another "community use" (a YMCA), but in no event will public park, greenway and trail acreage fall below 47,9, now a part of City Park. REVISED Amendment No. !0 2° 6 & 7 III Foothill Boulevard Centers Concept Special attention has been focused on the character of development along the southern boundary of Terra Vista, the community's frontage on Foothill Boulevard. This special attention is warranted for the following reasons: Foothill Boulevard is a primary travel route in the region; more people will be viewing Terra Vista from this vantage point than from any other. Since Terra Vista is at the geographical heart of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, views of Terra Vista will contribute greatly to people's impressions of the City as a whole. Land along Foothill Boulevard, by virtue of its exposure to thousands of passere-by, has the potential of contributing substantially to the City tax base if developed to its full commercial potential. Foothill Boulevard represents a transition from residential development north of the boulevard to non-residential development south of the boulevard, and, consequently, development along Foothill Boulevard in Terra Vista should act as a buffer between--and should complement--these land uses. As the design guidelines are put into effect with each development along Foothill Boulevard, the result should be a visual impression of a variety of building types and scales, a comfortable rhythm of open and developed spaces, and melding of business, institutional, and residential functions. As described in the commercial land use section of Chapter III, the Foothill Boulevard frontage has been organized into a series of centers, each intended to feature a unique mix of land uses, complementary building shapes and sizes, and distinctive character. These centers allow for many efficiencies, including: · Shopping and business in a central location, providing maximum convenience and minimum travel for Rancho Cucamonga residents and employees · Easy access from both Foothill Boulevard and Church Street, resulting in smoother traffic flow and greater convenience Direct pedestrian access from the Terra Vista greenway system along trails, bikeways, and sidewalks, allowing community residents to eliminate many automobile trips Location on primary local and regional transit routes, allowing convenient bus travel Primary vehicular access to each center from cross-streets, rather than from Foothill Boulevard, allowing a smoother flow of traffic along the boulevard · Opportunities for the sharing of parking areas and other facilities by complementary uses The result is that the centers along Foothill Boulevard can function as true "one-stop" multi- purpose attractions for areawide residents. The fact that the centers will be well planned, attractively landscaped, and easily identified will help to make REVISED Amendment No, 1 & 7 IV-47 Town Center financial/ Executive "1" . · Entettainnlmt · I!ealaurantl , O(flGel ,BanIra · CaWlie& .MedMal Lmne · Itedclentid eltmlclenUd eHoepital · OIc;e · MeclIGal Related FaGlab FIGURE Foothill Bouhward Cemer Idenmy and Pmdomba~ Uses REVISED Amendment No. I, 6, a & 7 IV-4~ the centers the place to go rather than one or two individual entities within them. Because of this, all the concerns located in the centers should benefit. The overall design concept for the centers along Foothill Boulevard is best described by breaking down the centers' design guidelines into the following four components: · Center identity and specific uses · Access and community gateways · Site planning and pedestrian network · Landscape treatment Each of these components is described below in terms of how they will affect the image and appearance of Terra Vista from Foothill Boulevard. Following this discussion are individual profiles of each center. Center Identity and Specific Uses Each center along Foothill Boulevard is intended to cater to a different mix of business, office, professional, and residential functions. For convenience, each has been identified by a preliminary name reflecting the types of uses currently expected to predominate within it (Figure IV-63): · Town Center · CnmmnrciRI P~rk · Financial/Restaurant Area d Medical Park · Execulive Park The discussion in Chapter |11 on commercial land uses in Tetra Vista described the unique mix of specific commercial facilities in each center that complemen[s adjoining commercial centers yel promotes variety and idenlity. Access and Community Gateways Accels, Within the Te~'ra Vista community, primary access to each of the centers along Foothill Boulevard will be from Church Street and north-south streets connecting Church Street with Foothill Boulevard, as indicated diagrammatically in Figure IV- 64. The reason for this access concept is twofold: Smoother Traffic Flow, Anticipated traffic levels along Foothill Boulevard are relatively high; the removal of primary access poinls from Foothill Boulevard allows for smoother traffic flow along the boulevard. Left turns into cenlers will generally be confined to the intersections and locations shown, since such movements at other than strategically spaced locations can inhibit traffic flow. Better TrRffic Distribmatlon. Access from Church Street and from cross streets perpendicular to Foothill Boulevard will help to distribute traffic more equally between Church Sireat and Foothill Boulevard than would be possible with primary Foothill Boulevard access points only. Tetra Vista Residents will have no need Communlly liesMawR Park Conmm~iel Plaza 1 m,ememm FIGUREIV-.IM t--m, Pmlmmm'WA4;eeee Primary Access and ~-'awAa, Concept for Foothi bard Io use Foothill Boulevard for intra-community flips for shopping, enterlainment, and other daily needs. Gateways. Gateways are another major means of punctuating the Foothill Boulevard frontage in Terra Visa. As indicated in Figure IV-64, there are two Type I gateways to the community through the Foothill Boulevard commercial development. These major gateways occur at ~e corners of Foothill Boulevard with Mfiliken and Rochester Avenues. I and Type III gateways will have 8 consrelent treatment, as described in the landscape section earlier in Ibis chapter. She Planning and Pedestrian Nelwork; Each cenler along Foothill Boulevard will have a different appearance from the boulevard within the context of the uniform Tetra Vista design image. As indicated conceptually in Figure IV-65, the arrangement of buildings, parking areas, and pedestrian walkways is unique to each caRtel'. For example: In the Town Center, smaller buildings are clustered close to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, while more imposing commercial struclures are sol back from these streets. The primary greenway spine leads directly to Ihe Town Center community commercial center and to the east-wast pedestrian linkage through the Foothill Boulevard centers. tia.n · In the Financial/Restaurant Plaza, buildings will encircle the site; centralized parking will serve all establishmeRle but be hidden from view trom Foothill Boulevard. The pedestrian walkway will assume a circular configuration around lhe parking area. · In Ihe Medical Park, as with lhe Corporate Park, a generous open space wilhin lhe campus will be the focus lot buildings. Larger heallh care facilities will be set well back from Foothill Boulevard. A pedestrian path will lead to lhe site and will, in turn, connect with the trail system. · In the Executive Park, buildings will alternale from locations close to Foothill Boulevard to brations set well back from lhe boulevard. Automobile dealerships would lealure small open display pavilions lining Foothill Boulevard, with primary buildings set back from the boulevard and service areas oriented away from view. · The landscaped pedestrian way will help to buffer commercial and residential developments. The result of this carefully conceived site planning. coupled with detailed designs for each center that will be reviewed prior (o site development, should be a development pattern that uses scale, rhythm. variety to excellent advantage. Landscaoe Treatrpenl;. Each cenler has been carefully evaluated from the standpoint of landscaping to create meRCeR r FIAIRQkV Exv, uUw an attractive, ~nicured image for Terra Vis(a along ~~ < ~ ~V P~a - ~ ~ ~F gonteh:nto t~h la~ nd~ sca~~~ cob nce~ tt ib ~l lude ' oulevard. T~ various co~o~nts that have II red rows P ' ~~ ~k ~'~ . ' w Berms -- ~M~ ~' ~,~,~ symbolizing the hrra Vista community will line Foothill ~ ~ulevard. In addit~n, e~h center along Foothill ~q ~ulevard will ~ve a unique mix of landscaping treatments in conf~mance with t~ building arrange~nt ~thin tim site. For examp~: ~ ~ ~ F~ffil ~ ~,~ · AI the community comn~rc~l center within the Town Cemer, edOe planrings will be provided to ~ ~1 p~ clarly s~n by motorists along Foothill -- · .... ;,d; . · . , , . ,; ,,.,.~;~.:..~..:~.:.:~:~;~.:.~:.:.:..:.::::.:. ': ~:~' REVISED A~nen~l No. 1, 5 i ~ IV-51 In the Financial/Restaurant Plaza, the parking area will be screened from motorists on Foothill Boulevard by the buildings themselves. Informal planrings will be provided around and between the buildings. In the Medical Park, there will be two rows of trees, plus landscaping in the parking areas along Foothill Boulevard, Landscaoina and low berms may also be providea to screen parking areas further. In the Executive Park, views will open up in landscaped areas, such as between medical/professional office buildings adjoining the Medical Park. Planrings and berms will provide some screening where these views are not available, such as between automobile display pavilions oriented toward Foothill Boulevard. In this last regard, the setbacks for both parking areas and buildings along Foothill Boulevard have been specially selected to address the Boulevard's unique role as a primary travel corridor in Rancho Cucamonga. As noted in the section earlier in this chapter on landscaping, setbacks along Foothill Boulevard from the curb to parking areas will be 28 feet minimum (43 feet average), and from the curb to buildings, 38 feet minimum (43 feet average). It was felt in planning the Foothill Boulevard frontage that the objectives of variety and visual interest would be best sewed by a combination of techniques that REVISED Amendment No. I & 7 IV-52 would be used in conjunction with setbacks. These techniques, which are described elsewhere in this section, include: Specifying average setbacks (43 feet .from the curb to parking areas or buildings) in addition to minimum setbacks, assuring that many buildings will be set well back beyond the minimum required distance Site planning guidelines for several of the' parcels along Foothill Boulevard calling for very generous setbacks, taking on the image of landscaped parks Berming that occurs along portions of the boulevard frontage within the Planned Community to soften views and screen parking areas Major "windows" into the projects periodically along the boulevard frontage, constituting large setbacks in special situations. Summary, To provide an overview of the image one will have driving along Foothill Boulevard past the various commercial centers, a "panorama" of development along the boulevard has been prepared. Figure IV-67 offers a conceptual plan of the entire Foothill Boulevard frontage within Terra Vista and, in conjunction with this conceptual plan, a view or views of soma of the major highlights along the corridor. (Larger reproductions of these views will follow.| As indicated by Figure IV-67, development along Foothill Boulevard--acknowledging that actual development may differ according to specific development programs but will adhere to the spirit and quality portrayed-will be epitomized by variety, attractive clusterings of buildings and open spaces, and an image that builds on the unique heritage and qualities of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ,., Community Commercial Cantel ~gW.O..!~;:~tPd- The Community Commercial Center Iocaled"""Or~" Foothill Boulevard belween Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue will be a one-stop commercial center serving Tetra Vista and Rancho Cucamonga, suPPlementing other neighbo~hoodlvillage corrrnercial centers with a broader range of stores (Figure IV-l). The center as currenlly envisioned would have at least two deparlmenl stores, numerous tenant stores, and recreational and eating lacilities. The sile is also expected to have offices integrated with the communily commercial development. The center wil~ offer an attractively landscaped environment that will encourage strolling, window shopping, and pausing to relax at shaded seating clusters. The various buildings that make up the center can be joined together by covered walkways sheltering Pedestrians and conveying themes such as arbors, trellises, and vines. Through this architecttual treatment, which will be a low profile and sel ofl by open space, the architectural heritage of Rancho Cucamonga will be recalled. Landscaping will play a major role in views of the center from Foothill Boulevard. Earth barins will minimize views of parking areas adjacent Io the boulevard, while still allowing the buildings to be seen from (he road. The masses of the various buildings in the center wil be divided so as to be human scaled and not to appear rnonolilhic. Through the rhythm that win be created by the inleraction of bndscaping, buildings, aad landscaped parking areas, no one element wil dominate views from Foothill Boulevard and a varied visual image will result. HEVl~:DArrmr, Nrmml~o. ii&:7 lV-54 Furthermore, by oftenling a number of smaller buildings around an open space at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, an attractive image of the canlet (and of the community) is provided to pegpie driving along both arterial5 {Figure IV-69}. Through the use of landscaped Pedestrian connections throuOh the center and parking areas, the major greenway spine, which terminates al the northeast side of the community commercial parcel, is efleclivegy brought through the center all the way to the corner. A * _Conwnercial Park. fig, P,c. / of decoraUve bees. founldnl. end dignO areas seaace area ./ I ,k_ REVI~EO AmendmeN No. 7 FIGURE IV-71 View of Town Center Plaza from Foothill Boulevard t FIGURE IV-72 View of Town Center Plaza from Spruce Avenue /2~/'/,/ DATE: TO.' July 6, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: SUBJECT: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION REQUESTING MANDATE RELIEF FROM EXISTING AND NEW PROGRAMS ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE LEGISLATURE AND CONGRESS Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which seeks relief from various State and Federal mandated programs. Backs~round During the last several months, and perhaps extending back as much as two years, both the State and Federal government have been attempting to curtail existing mandated programs to local government, and have worked to prohibit the addition of new mandated programs. However, despite their best efforts mandates continue to be issued by both levels of government. Two recent examples indicate the difficulty in preventing these kind of programs. The first is at the Federal level, and is a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This mandate requires that local agencies perform video tape inspection documentation of all storm drains within the jurisdiction. The jurisdiction must then establish any corrective action which is necessary, and then, of course, fulfill the corrective measures. At the State level, the Brown Act has recently been amended to require that agendas and minutes be provided for all City Council sub-committee meetings, as well as those of commissions. Staff and material are required to perform the requirements for the implementation of the legislation. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has done it's share in cost containment and in reduction, and now requests that the Legislature and Congress provide mandate relief for a local government. The attached resolution, which would be sent to all legislators at both the State and Federal level serving the City of Rancho Cucamonga, states the City's position and asks for concurrence in meeting mandate relief. Director 201 RESOLUTION NO. 94-**** A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE MANDATE RELIEF FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, since the 1990/91 fiscal year, has reduced it's operating costs by over $4 million and has reduced it's staff by nearly 25% in an effort to meet the demands placed upon the City by the recession; by the undercounting of the Federal census; and by revenue losses to the State of California in property taxes, and; WHEREAS, during these already difficult times, both the Legislature and Congress have continued to impose mandates. The requests for mandate relief are many and include reductions in requirements for notification of fee increases, elimination of fleet vehicle inspections, and less State oversight on general plan housing elements, and; WHEREAS, despite the efforts at the State and Federal level to reduce mandates, two relatively new requirements have been imposed upon local jurisdictions. At the Federal level, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requires that local agencies perform video tape inspection and documentation of every storm drain within the jurisdiction, identifying and correcting any illegal connection. At the State level, the revised Brown Act requires that any and all City Council sub-committee meetings be noticed with an appropriate agendas and staff reports. 202 Additionally, following each meeting it is required that minutes be provided for each meeting. No funding has been provided for either mandate, and; WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has done it's part in controlling costs and reducing overhead. The City asks that the State and Federal governments follow this example by carefully reviewing all mandate legislation to determine first if it is required; and secondly, if it is, to provide funding within existing revenue levels. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga urges the State of California and the Congress of the United States to eliminate all future mandates and to curtail or reduce those mandates already imposed. 2O3 A RESOLUTION OF I~E CITY ~ OF THE CITY OF ~ G3CAMCer~ U~GING I~E CITY GIMCIL OF ~HE CITY OF LOS ANn~.~ TO TAKE APPF~PRL~TE ACTIC$~S TO MITE IHE EXPANSIC~q OF I}[E PIANN~D P~ T~MX]~L FA~ILTrIES OF MUmEAS, the Ontario L-~arnatic~al AizlxFt is operated by the City of through i~ Deputment of Ainxmts; and M{BREAS, the Ontario Internati~ A/~ is a significant ecc~rmic develqm~ent resource of regicr~l and state wide significance; and M{BREAS, the Ontario Internaticrml A/rpcrt has experierred t~m~acus levels of ~ in both cargo and passer3er activity; and M~EAS, the current passenger facilities at the Ontario WHBREAS, the reqic~ surrounding the airport has suffered tremmdcus loeses in military and related aerospace employment far dispcrti~te to the M~qEAS, the econmnic recovery in the region is deemdent upon the expansic~ of this important transporation facility; and M{EREAB, the entire state is experiencin~ an eccrrmic reoessim and corres~rrttr~ lack of private investment and development; and of perivate investment; and NOW THBREP'~RE, BE IT RESOLV~D, the the City Council of the City of RancSo O~mc~ga does hereby urge that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Los Angeles take all n~x~y steps to expedite the expansic~ of passether facilities at the Ontario International ~. A RESOLUT/C~ OF IHE CITY ~ OF ~HE ClTY OF RANa~ (1EAM}r~ DECEARING ITS SUPPCi~ KR A BELC~ GRADE DESIGneD FRRn~AY ~ ~HE BNIIRE ~ OF ~IE FOalI4TF=, WH~EAS, the City of Ranaho O~,.r..4a has c~:ixrusly sultvart for the develc~mmt of the Route 30 Foothill Feeesay thruugh its adcptad General Plan and applicable Specific Plane; ar~ M~REAS, the City traffic circu/atkra syste ms designed to fully utilize the efficiency of and is de~ c~ the ~ 30 Freely; M{BREAS, the City of Rancho 0.'~..,.~ previously in a letter dated ~ 12, 1991 detailed its ~ relati%~ to envizYa -.~al ccrsideraticrs including the aesthetics of the ult~ts freeway design; and Mum~s, the City of Rand~ O~nga has historically printed policies that are designed to protect and improve the scenic quality of the City through its General Plan, Specific Plan, ara has ~ the highest ~ of ae~ign for public ar~ private projects; and M{BREAS, a below grade freeway wuuld be the least visually obtrusive ar~ socially divisive alternative and w~uld not only be consistent with the goals ar~ objectives of the City's General Plan, hut would also further them; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ranc~o 0~2~,,c.~3a hereb~ officially declares its desire, intent, and policy to su~ the design of a below grade freeway alcrr/the entire Ranc~o O~?~,.;~3~ corridor. DATE: TOt. FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July' 6. 1994 Mayor and Members of the Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT City Council Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO PREVENT CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES As requested, staff has presented a copy of an ordinance that is in place in Gainesville, Florida that addresses the problem of convenience store robberies. This ordinance was developed in reaction to a very publicized robbery and murder at a Gainesville convenience store. In addition. the City of Gainesville was reacting to the fact that 50% of all business robberies in the city were committed against convenience stores. This initiated a 16 month study effort by Gainesville to determine effective ways of dealing with this problem. The result was the Gainesville Convenience Store Ordinance and its related amendments. Adopted in July 1986, the Gainesville ordinance had provisions which included: Removal of signs posted in windows to provide a clear and unobstructed view of the cash register and sales area; Locate sales area so that the clerk and customer are clearly visible from the street; 3. Post a conspicuous sign in the window which states: a) b) c) the cash register has $50 or less, employee has access to $50 or less, and a drop-safe or time release safe is maintained in the store; Parking lots are to be lit at an intensity of 2-foot candles per square foot, with a uniformity ratio of no more than 5:1; , Install a security camera of a type and number approved by the city; o Provide mandatory robbery prevention training to all employees who work between the hours of 7 PM and 5 AM; Require two employees be on duty between the hours of 8 PM and 4 AM. Since the ordinance was adopted in 1986. Gainesville has experienced a 79% decrease in convenience store robberies from 61 in 1986 to 13 in 1993. 2O6 CITY COUNCIL MEETING PREVENTING CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES July 6, 1994 Page 2 While Rancho Cucamonga has not had the same problems with convenience store robberies, the City Council has expressed interest in preventing crime rather than reacting to it. This type of ordinance has been tried with some success in Gainesville and other cities in Florida as well as many cities in Ohio. If the City Council feels that this type of ordinance should be pursued, staff will meet with convenience store owners, the Chamber of Commerce and the City Attorney's Office to adapt concepts similar to those in the Gainesville ordinance to the specific circumstances of our community. Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager 207 I ORDINANCE NO. 3230 O-e6-30 4 5 6 7 8 I0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY or GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, CREATING CEAPTER 14B OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES ENTITLED "CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES"I pROVIDING DEFINITIONSs ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS, ESTABLISHING SECURITY MEASURES INCLUDING TRAINING, NUMBER OF PERSONNEL TO BE ON DUTY AND LIGHTING REOUIREMENTSI Pe~ABLIIHZNG A RIGHT OF ENTRY iPOR INSPECTION; ESTABLISHING PENALTIES1 PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSEt PROVIDING A ~EPEALING CLAUSEs AND PROVIDING AJ~ EFFECTIVE DATE, W~rEREA$, the number of h~micides and robberies as C~nvenience Food Stores exceeds the number of such incidents st other establishments between the hours of I:00 p.m. and :. 4:00 s.m.1 ::j~ .... WHEREAS, SUCh ~Cell demonltzjstes s greeter likelihood lthst such incidents viII occur unless precautionary measures 19 ,' ' ....... I!are taken.at Convenience Toed $tores~ 20 N~IEREAS, the occursnee of such incidents has resulted in 21 22 23 loss of life sad loss of property end is contrary to the public health, safety end eelfare of the employees and customers of Convenience Food liareel 27 28 ' i CODEs Except for whole sections added o: deleted ms indicated in the text, words in eefeek-tkeee~k type deletions from existing lav~ verde in undersco*-ed type additions* 208 e '1 · WHEREAS, the Police Department of the City Gain, avails has provided evidence that these regulations necessary and provide essential requirements that minimize or eliminate the excessive incidents of homicide end/or robbery at Convenience eHd Stores. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORD&INED BY THE CITY COMMISSION Or THE CITY OF GAINESVZLLE, FLORIDA= i Section l* Chapter 14B, consisting of Sections 14B-1 ]0!lthrough 14B-3 inclusive, is hereby crested and added to the SiCode of Ordinances of the City of Gainesviii, as feZlays: Chapter I4B - Convenience Food States ,. li Sac. 14S-1. Definitions. The foliovan9 terms and phrases, vhen used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to the~. in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: (a) "Convenience ~ood Store" establishment that: (2) is i business derives SOt or more of its gross income from the isle of goods, merchandise, o: other articles of value in their original ~ontainers offers · limited quantity and vmriety of food, household and sundry items end, 26. deletions from ·dditionso :1 CODEs Except for vhole sections added or deleted ms inditeted in the text, MOrdS in ·eeeek-ekwee~ type are existing law; words in underscored type are (b) (c) (3) operates It any time durin; the hours of 8:00 p.m. end 4:00 s.m. end, (4) does not awl1 or have for sale prescription drug items, "Owner" il the perish, cotpetition, partnership, ~oint wentuFa or other group enterprise having Xsvful possession of the premises upon dhich the Convenience roo~ ~re is operete~. "l~ployee" partnership, Ze;ally responsib.le fop the operation of the Convenience Foo~ is. the person, corporation, Joint venture or group enterprise day-to-day Store, Sec. 142-2. Regulations. Convenience Foo~ Stores shalZ cmply with the following reguZations. (e) There is. no m~nimum number of employees required during operetional hours. (b) Locate any signs posted in the windova so as to provide a cZear and unobstructed view of the cash register and sexes area from the itreet* CODEs ~xcept for whole sections edded or delete~ as 27 indicated in the text, words in oteeek-tkfeegk'tYPe ire deletions irma existing levi voids An underscored type ere 28 additions- ', 210 9 16 (c) Locate the sales area Io that the c~erk and cussseer are fully visible fro~ the stree~ at the time of the ·ales transaction, (d) Post · conspicuous sign in the vin~ow which states that the cash register has or less in (e) Have no more than $50,00 cash ·vsila~le and readily accessible 'to employHis. (f) Maintain s drops·re o: time release sa~e at the Convenience Food Store which is to the floor, o: installed in the f~o::, weighs at least five hundred (500) ;~unds. (g) Post a conspicuous sign in the window which states that there is a safe at the convenience store and it is not accessShaH to IT'. 18, 19' ;, 20 i 2sil ,! the employees. (h) The entire area of-the Convenience F~ Store, utilized by customers for perkinG, · hall I~e lighted and maintained st five foot candles per square foot, The level o~ lighting shall be moasu,-ed at the surface of the ~rking area, '. (i) Install a security cae:a of a ty~ CODE: Except for whole sections added or de2eted as indicated' in the text, verde in eteeak-tkeeegk type deletions f,-mu exl~t/f~; ~avl vo.-dl in undersco*'ed type a.-e 2H!iadditton·, · 211 I 3 4 9 10 I! 12 13 14 t number 'epproved by the City Manager or his designee, Said camera must be capable of producing a retrievable image on film or ta~e that can be made a pe.-manent record end that can be enlarged through projection or other means, Cameras meeting the requirements this section shall be maintained in proper working order at all times and shall De subject to periodic inspection by the City Manager o: his design,e. (j) Any owner or employee who works between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 4:00 e.m. st a Convenience Food Store shall complete a course in itobbery prevention to be given by the Gain, swill, Police Department, or a certified by the City Manager or his design,e, ~ithin 90 .days after he or she begins employment. If the Gain, swill, Police Depertment's Itobbety prevention course is utilized, the City Manager or his designed 8hell determine the oost of training per employee to the City, and the Convenience Food Itore shall ImY the test' to the Gain, swill, ~(~ CODEs Except for whole sections added o*- deleted as 27 indicated in the text, words in etfueketkeoeek type are deletions free existing levi words in underscored type ere 28~ additions, 212 2 police Department prior to the trainin; of the 3 e~ployee. 4 Sec. 14B-3. Penalties. (a) Violation of Iny of the above nu~bere~ Sections is subject to penistenant as provide~ in Section 1-8 of the Oainesville Code 8 9 IOii (c) Section 2. Ordinances* The City of Gainesville may obtain inJunctive relief to restrain or prohibit violatio~ of this Ordinance, The occupational tax receipt for .any estab- lishment may be revoked by the City Mana;er or his deal;nee open proof of violation of this O:dinance- section, lentence, clause or p~rlse d · , · ld to be inv.sli or unconstitutiona; :;i,:: nt Jurisdiction, .then laid holdin; u shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining p~rtions 20~of this Ordinance, Section 3- All ordinances, o: parts of ordinances, in conflict herewith a=e, to the extent o'f luck conflict here~y repealed- 61 CODEs Except for whole sections added or deleted indicated in the text, words in ateuek-tkeoelk type deletions free existing lays words in underscored type additions* is ire are · 213 2f Section 4, This ordinance shall stand rapeslaG 3 !years after its effective date. Section S, This ordinance shall become effective 120 5 days from the date of final adoption, 6 DATED this 14th day of ~,,l~y , 1986. 8 . 10. C~R~OF & e !l ~HE CO~SSIO This Ordinance passed on first reading this 13I¸ 15 ,I r.a~ 16liThis Ordinance , 1986- 19!i 20!i I 14*,h day of 2'i day of passed on second and final readin~ this , 1986. 24 CODEs I~cept for whole sections added or deleted as indicated in the text, words in eteuek-ekeougk type are Idalotions from existing lays wrds in underscored type are 28!additions* . . 214 3 4 6 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 ORDINANCE NO. 330B 0-86-127 AN ORDINANCE OF tHE CITY OF .GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA. IEL,ATING TO CONVENIENCE FOOD ITORESs APIENDING SECTION 14l-2(h) Or tEE CODE or 'ORDINANCES OF TEE CITY OF GAINESgILLS, BY CHANGING THE LIGHTING REOUIREMENTS ~OR THE PARKING AAEA UTILIZED BY CUSTOMERSJ PROVIDING A IEVERAIILITY CLAUSEf PROVIDING & IEPEALING CLAUSEf AND PROVIDING AN ZNNEDIATE EFFECTIVE WHEREAS, st least ten (1O) days notice has been given once in s nayspaper of general circulation notifying the public of this proposed'ordinance and of · Public Bearing in the A, Clarence O'Swill Auditorium of the Municipal Building of the City of Cdinesville, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED THE CItY OF GAINESVILLE, Section l, Subsection (h) of Section 14H-2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Gainesvilla, is trended to read= 19 20 21 93 93 98 Sac, 14l-2- bgulstions, Convenience Food Stores shall etaply with the following regulations~ · The entire ere· of the ~·fkinlv that& be Sighted end maintained et d&ve 46+ Joel weedtee fee eWeswe leet~ eke &eve& el Sitkklne eklJJ ~ messawed el eke muff·so el the ~ek~el I~eev ~8rkieo lot utilised by castmere of the CODINGt Igorde atelobes ere deletions= verde underlined are additions, -1-. 215 3 4 5 6 ? 8 9 1! 12 13 J8 19 Convenience ~ood Sco~e must be l~Ghted dwr~A; a~l hours darkness when employees customers are on the premises ms Klnimu~ avera;e maintained llluminance must be two (2) foot candles or Qreater with · uniformity ratio (ave to minimum) of no zorerC~:n (2] AdditionallY, all such li;~tlnQ Shall be in accordance with the applicable City Zi~htinG code requirements. Section 2- If 8n~ section, sentence, clause or phrase ~f this ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent ~urisdiction, then said holding shall in no va~ affect the validityof the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section ~. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances, in conflict herewith are to the extent ot such conflict'h'ere~y repealed, Section 4, This ordinance shall stand repealed on July 15, 1918, Section 5- This ordinance shall become effective 120 days from the date of final adoption, 27 28 C~DINGt tk)rds em~Stken are deletions; yards underlined are additions* -2- 216 e· · ] I 3 4 6 ? 8 1! DATED this lath day of DecemSer . 298 § d~~o/TH~ co~:s~:~c~/~ e R3Rtnmh of This ordinance passed on first reading this December , 198 6 · This ordinance passed on second she final reading this ISth day of Deceff~er , 198 ~ · 13 14 15 16 l? A,t~l~' City el binmvgl,., Rmda . DEC 16 mS 18 19 21 27 CODZNGt IIords ete&eket ere Ueletionsx emrds underlined seditions* 217 2 31 6 i 71 8 21 ORDINANCE NO. 3318 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GAINSEVILLE, FLORIDA RELATING TO CONVENIENCE FOOD STemEEl AMENDING SECTION 14B-2 (s)l TO REOUXRE THAT TwO EMPLOYEES BE ON DUTY DURING CERTAIN OPERATIONAL SOUPS ZN ALL CONVENIENCE ,SOD STORES! AMENDING SECTION 34S-2(0) TO REOUIRE ALL CONVENIENCE ,SOD STORE EMPLOYEES WHO WORK IETq~EEN THE HOURS OF ?t00 AND St00 A.M. TO COetPLETE A COURSE IN ROSBER~ P~EVENTXON WITHIN (30) DAYS OF EMPLOYMENTI PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSEl PROVIDING A ~EPEALING CLAUSEs AND P~OVIDZNG AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the number of homicides and robberies st Convenience Foc~ Stores exceeds the number of such incidents st other estsblistunents between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and S:O0 s.m.x WHEREAS, such excess demonstrates likelihood precautionary SEereel and WHEREAS, s greater that such incidents viII occur unless measures ere taken st Convenience Foc~ the occurrence of such incidents his is resulted in loss of life sad loss of property and eontrsry to the public health, safety and yellers of the employees and ~ustomers of ConvertRomeo Food Itsreef and WHEREAS, the Police IMpartsent of .the City of Gainesvilla has provided evidence that lye 12) employees on duty between the hours of St00 p,m. end 4s00 s.m. vould provide an essential requirement that .vould minimize or CODZNGt Words stateben are 'deistJones verde underlinefi are additions. · 218 1 4 vt 11 13. J eliminate the excessive incidents of homicide robbery.st Convenience Food Stores, BOw, THEREFORE, BE IT O~DAINED BY THE CITY OF THE CITY or GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA: Section l, Subsections (a) and (5) section 14B-2 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Gainesvil~e, T2orida, ere s~ended to readz °Sec, 14B-2 Regulations, All Convenience rood Stores with the followin~ re~ulmtions. shall c~r. ply (a) these to fie at~tmma 9mAbel of eAWieyees veqmifed duties epefttioRtt kOmfSf If o~en for business after 8,00 ~.~,, the Convenience Store ~ust e~loy two Detains who are continuously on duty on the premises fro~ D.~. until closing: or 4~00 s.t. whichever event occurs first, (5) Any owner' or employee who works between the hours of e,O0 p,n, ewd 4,OO e,m- ~,00 ~.~. St00 s,m, et · Convenience Food Store shall complete · course in Robbery prevention to be given by the binesville hli~e bpsrtssnt, or · prograB certified by the City Hansget or his designee, e~thin. gS 3,_Odeys eftor he or she begins employment, If the Gainseville Police. CODINGt Words are additions, oteleken ere deletionsl words underlined 219 ' 1 3 4 6 I 16i 17i 18 19, 20 I)epartment's Iobbery Prevention course is utilized, the City Manager or his designed shall determine the cost of trainin~ per employee to the City, and the Convenience Food Store shall Police pay the cost to the Gainesvilla Department prior to the trainine of the employee," Section 2. The two employees required pursuant to subsection (a) of Sec. 14 S-2 of Section 2 of this Ordinance mus't be employed and trained on or before the effective date of this ordinance as provided in Section ~ below. Section 3. If any portion of this ordinance is declared by a court of competent Jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforcesble, such declaration shall not* be deemed to effect the rematntn~ portions of this ordinance. Section 4. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances, in conflict herewith are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed. ' Section S. This ordinance shall stand repealed on November 11, 1988. Section 6. This ordinan=e abel1 be effective 60 days from the date of final adoption. CODINGt Words ereJokes ere dsletionss cords ,underlined ere oddaliens, AZG: kb t 13 14 15 16 This ordinance passe~ day on first reedlug this d ~7 this 2rid day of February, 17 18 19 Jl CODlaGs Words ereJokeR are deleti~ns~ ~rds underlihee · are odd&lions, *e PROPOSED GUIDELINES I. Ad Hoc status recommended. 2. Formalized approved minutes taken and reported to City Council Officials. 3. Regular meetings, bi-monthly, unless additional meetings deemed necessary. 4. Route 30 Freeway Ad Hoc Committee to report, quarterly, to the Residents/Community. ROUGH DI~FT GOVER!~ENTAL ENTITIES 1. CAL TRANS 2. SANBAG 3. Law Makers A V City Council Officials A City Council Sub Committee Route 30 Ad Hoc Committee I. Elected Official 2. City Manager 3. C-CAR Representatives 4. Appropriate Commissioners 5. Appropriate City Personnel Staff Residents/Community