Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020/08/19 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L.Mayor ennis Michael REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Mayor Pro Tern August 19, 2020 Lynne B. Kennedy Members of the City 10500 Civic Center Drive Council: Ryan A. Hutchison Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Kristine D. Scott 00l Sam Spagnolo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD — CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY— PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION TRI—COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID-19 virus,there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings. Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In place of in-,person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in one of the following ways: Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or Local Cable: RCTV3 Programming Members of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774-2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at (909)774-2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the order received. The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the COVID-19 virus. If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at(909) 774-2023, 24 hours prior to the meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Page 1 CLOSED SESSION - 4:30 P.M. TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9789 MAIN STREET IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209062020000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CAROL NORRIS, NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. -- CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7089 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES LORI SASSOON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE, TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH -- CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) - CITY D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: (1 CASE) D5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9: 1 CASE THE CITY HAS RECEIVED A LETTER THREATENING LITIGATION IN CONNECTION WITH THE CANCELLATION OF A TOWING SERVICES AGREEMENT. THE LETTER IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE. - CITY CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Page 2 D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209-272-11, 0209-143-21, AND 0209-272-22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND MICHAEL DIEDEN REPRESENTING EMPIRE YARDS AT RANCHO, LLC; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY D7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: AWI BUILDERS, INC V. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. CIVDS 1928697 D8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 - CITY D9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554 - CITY E. RECESS — Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Page 3 REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1. Announcement of Free Thermometers Provided to Rancho Cucamonga Businesses from FEMA. B2. Overview of the RC Cares Community Assistance Grants Program. B3. Recognition of Noah Daniels, Finance Manager, for his completion of the Government Finance Officers Association's Certified Public Finance Officer(CPFO) Program, earning him the designation of CPFO. B4. Presentation of the 2020 Western Region International Public Management Association for Human Resources' Agency Award for Excellence. B5. Announcement of Summer Drive-In Concert featuring The Answer. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency,Successor Agency,and Public Finance Authority.This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Page 4 hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Due to the relatively few items typically pending before the Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority, the City Council may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar. D. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of August 5, 2020. 9 D2. Consideration to Approve Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $684,345.08 and Weekly 19 Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of$1,090,405.43 Dated July 27, 2020 Through August 10, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of July 2020 in the Amount of $3,381,960.99. D3. Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California 30 Gas Company in the Amount of$310.87 Dated July 27, 2020 Through August 10, 2020. D4. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 2020. 32 D5. Consideration to Approve the use of OMNIA Partners Cooperative Agreement with Grainger 40 for the Procurement of Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO) Supplies, Parts, Equipment, Materials, and Related Services and Authorize the use of Future Renewals as Awarded by City of Tucson, to be Funded by Various Account Numbers, in Accordance with the Adopted Budget. D6. Consideration to Approve the use of a Cooperative Contract Through OMNIA Partners 42 Awarded by the City of Tamarac Contract #19-12R to Office Depot for the Procurement of Office Supplies, Products and Related Services for Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and Authorize the use of Future Renewals as Awarded by the City of Tamarac Through Omnia Partners. D7. Consideration of the purchase of Emergency Medical Supplies and Materials in the 44 combined, not to exceed amount of $75,000 from Life Assist and Henry Schein. E. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL E1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of August 5, 2020. 9 CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Page 5 E2. Consideration to Approve Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,017,183.60 and Weekly 46 Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of$6,218,315.13 Dated July 27, 2020 Through August 10, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of July 2020 in the Amount of $6,225,404.25. E3. Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California 57 Gas Company in the Amount of $6,227.97 Dated July 27, 2020 Through August 10, 2020. E4. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 2020. 59 E5. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan 73 Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-094) E6. Consideration to Approve the use of OMNIA Partners Cooperative Agreement with Grainger 80 for the Procurement of Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO) Supplies, Parts, Equipment, Materials, and Related Services and Authorize the use of Future Renewals as Awarded by City of Tucson, to be Funded by Various Account Numbers, in Accordance with the Adopted Budget. E7. Consideration to Approve the use of a Cooperative Contract Through OMNIA Partners 82 Awarded by the City of Tamarac Contract #19-12R to Office Depot for the Procurement of Office Supplies, Products and Related Services for Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and Authorize the use of Future Renewals as awarded by the City of Tamarac Through OMNIA Partners. E8. Consideration of Amendment No. 03 to Professional Services Agreement with Magellan 84 Advisors, LLC (CO18-103) for Fiber Optic Project Management and Design Services for Fiscal Year 2020/21 and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of$8,000 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund. E9. Consideration to Approve a Solar Incentive Rebate in the Amount of$300,000 For Day Creek 85 Senior Housing Partners, LP and Day Creek Senior Housing Partners 2, L.P., and Authorization of an Appropriation for the Transfer of Funds from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to Cap and Trade Fund (Fund 709). E10. Consideration to Approve an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and 87 Resolutions Ordering the Annexation into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, and into Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 Located on the North Side of Fourth Street, Approximately 300 Feet West of Center Avenue, Related to Case No. DRC2018-00326. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-090), (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-091), AND (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-092). E11. Consideration of a Contract with TSR Construction and Inspection in an Amount of$81,355 105 Plus a 10% Contingency, and Authorization of an Appropriation Totaling in an Amount of $76,400 for the Crossing Surface Improvement at Arrow Route Railroad Crossing Project. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Page 6 E12. Approval and Execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the City of Rancho 110 Cucamonga and Newcastle Partners, Inc. for Property Commonly Known as APN 0229-021-97-0000 Generally Located at the North East Corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. E13. Consideration of Resolution No. 2020-093, Authorizing Application for and Receipt of Local 138 Early Action Planning Grant Program Funds. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-093) E14. Consideration to Authorize the Acceptance of the CARES Funding and Authorize the 142 Appropriation of Funds in the amount of $2,167,449 into Account Number: 1275000-4750/2050-0. F. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) SECOND READING/ADOPTION The following Ordinance(s) have been introduced for First Reading. Second Readings are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. The City Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Council Member. F1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 970 and Ordinance No. 144 971, Ordinances Amending Title 2 of the Municipal Code to Define the Functions and Obligations of the City Clerk and City Treasurer. (ORDINANCE NO. 970 AND ORDINANCE NO. 971) G. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) H. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S)—CITY/FIRE DISTRICT H1. Public hearing for Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 972 amending Section 149 17.36.020 to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed-use areas and Figure 17.38.060-15 to reflect the proposed change in the zoning designation along with ORDINANCE NO. 973 amending the zoning designation of 11.44 acres of land from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District to reflect the Mixed Use General Plan land use designation related to a proposed 131-unit multi-family development. (ORDINANCE NO. 972 & ORDINANCE NO. 973.) I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) 11. Consideration to Receive and File a Report Detailing the Actions Taken by Fire District and 502 Sheriff's Department Staff On and Before the 4th of July Holiday to Reduce and Discourage the Possession and Use of Fireworks, Enforce Local and State Laws Regarding Fireworks, and Prevent Fires Associated with Fireworks and Seasonal Weather Conditions. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Page 7 12. Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Program Supplement Agreement with California 505 Department of Transportation for the Local Roadway Safety Plan and Authorizing the City Manager, or Designee, to Approve and Execute Project Related Documents. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-097) 13. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 512 Fiscal Year 2020/21 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant for the Healthy RC Active Transportation Infrastructure Assessment and Improvement Plan and Authorizing the City Manager, or Designee, to Approve and Execute Related Documents. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-096) J. COUNCIL BUSINESS J1. Consideration of Appointment of Unopposed Candidates to City Offices (City Clerk and City 515 Treasurer) and Cancelling the Portion of the November 3, 2020, City Election for those Positions. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-095) J2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) J3. INTERAGENCY UPDATES --- (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) K. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS L. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING M. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy- Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909)477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Page 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COVID-19 COMMUNITY RELIEF PROGRAM For Rancho Cucamonga Residents and Businesses ONLY Rental Assistance Program RCC,,x4-�01 1a1031 COVID-19 ©p Rental Forgiveness Program COMMUNITY RELIEF PROGRAM County COVID-Compliant Business Partnership City Match A PPL I A TI O PPRIO D OPENS August 24 , 20201 Outdoor Business Operations 7�� o� Assistance Program To apply, please visit www.cityofrc.us/RCCares DEADLINE TO i ^� County VID- ompliant Rental Assistance Program Business Partnership U p to three (3) rnon t hs of ass ista nce. City Match* * San Bernardino County launched the COVID-Cornpliant Applicants must submit -evidence of current gr annual San �r�gr$m that provides, �2,500 for �t+�l nest h �+sel ld I n r'i�e. Applicant must der r trate I ss f businesses in the County to be compliant with current income because -of COVID-19 p$rld-ernic. CQVID-19 guidelines. * Applicant-s must d-ernonstraN, that thQy vverie eurtent -0t) F This program would provide a dollar-fiar-dollar match for theiY rent as of March 2020. any Rancho Cucamonga business that participates irw the Caunty's grog rare. Prof of participation is required. 1311 DD Rental I Forgiveness Program* t l r sine rations M 74nrAm Assistance Program* Provides funding to pay one month of deferred rent fir April or May 2020 on bohaIf of rosidontial tonants and • Biusinesses can be reirrkbursed of up to 2.000 for items sty 11 busi nesse!� (fewer tha n -()Q e rnployees) w ho cc nti n ue re lated to tra nsi t ioni ng to -ou tdQor busi nos operati ons pe r Lo s uffer f ro rn the effec is of COVI D-19. Docurne n tati o n a nd S to to &Cou my Hea I th e rders. proof of rent deferra I lender the Cjty's eviction moratoriurn • Applies to expenses that cceurred after duly 1. 2020. requi red. Tenants must derrwDrtistrate that they were net late on their rents prior to Apri12020. PCITYOF9RANCHO=UCA�MONGA COVID-19 COMMUNITY RELIEF PROGRAM How to Apply APPLICATION PERIOD OPENS AUGUST 24, 2020 To apply, please visit www.cityofrc.us/RCCares DEADLINE TO SUBMIT is September 4, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. R CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COVID-19 COMMUNITY RELIEF PROGRAM https://www.cityof rc.us/rcca res CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COVID49 COMMUNITY RELIEF PROGRAM Apply for Program(s) Program* GhaA all fiat apply ❑ Small Business Rental Forgiveness Program ❑ Outdoor Business Operations Assistance Program ❑ County COVID-Compliant Business Partnership City Match 1.Is your business physically located in Rancho Cucamonga? 0 Yes 0 No 2.Is your business in compliance with current State and County COVID-19 Health Orders?* 0 Yes 0 No 3.Does your business have a valid Rancho Cucamonga Business License? 0 Yes 0 No 4.Does your business continue to be financially impacted by COVID-19?* 0 Yes 0 No 5.D.you receive a federal Paycheck"ection Program loan in the amourd of$1 million or more? 0 Yes 0 No If you answered'No'to questions#1,2,3,41 ar'Yes'to question#5,you do NOT quality for these programs. Please do NOT proceed. Application rr Name of Business* Business Owner Last Name* Business Owner First Name* Email Address* Phone Number* Business Address Need HelpApplying? Three Options: 1. Call dedicated Helpline: (909) 774-(CARES) 2273 2. Email : RCcares@cityofrc. us 3. Office Hours: • Monday and Wednesday at City Hall (9 - 6 p. m .) • Tuesday and Thursday at Resource Center (9 - 6 p. m .) • Bilingual assistance (Spanish) • Appointments encouraged • COVID-19 safety measures enforced R CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COVID-19 COMMUNITY RELIEF PROGRAM 00 COVID-19 Financial Support R FOR RENTERS & BUSINESSES Applications Open August 24, 2020 � Q DAILY BULLETIN is Rental Assistance Program � � upmNree 6i m°nms°fas APPLICATION �'rGm"nn mae ae Ke ar rreMg�anMa' � ��Q �seMla rcnme.APPIicaM must tlem°rctrate bsr of /7JSa�. PERIOD OPENS m.b�a"R��Qvolgpa „� •apPrraM:m"�t ae„atnrare a,at tl ywere c"�reM°n Nair nettu of MaicM1 ZQZQ `°�""""°" AUGUST 24, 2020 �Qr�4Q4Q""�Aa,Q°w QOYIG-M CQMMU41ry e[tlerr oGPMY Rancho Cucamonga doling out$1.9 million to help renters,businesses eundingmmesfrom dty's snare ofrhe federzl CARES Act The cQlo—l—gild. aellef.arcs ECOIO 00 0000® TO apply, lease visit and4s�gned lnallawanMar he 11.—The rO Rental Forgiveness Program* PpY. P 3�Lill Ilan ec°namlc relief package pnvldes pmudes furdi MM1 rt defmal reM for www.cityofre.us/RCCares a endml� asss an e w wdl e� r murex ApN° Mayolror relanMlal a mn and nuslne lth sta,ess tl IMustrles In response to I the hea Rh]ntl ecOnpmk mpdctSMcwlo�l3 �aNll[usin�es lfewer[M1an lDD emPlu'ieesl wM1°wrtir.'e tter rium tneerc ssureovlQ is Qa<umenwvor ar- DEADLINE TO SUBMIT The en gEs—Indudes a Srso bllll°n relief P,mf°r reM aer.al"�,aertl�cy.er�M1v.�ram�, fund PoI state M local i is September m. �""`n"en "e�""m"memo ammxmeYwere�tlae°""'e' P P• prormAprilz z County COVID-Compliant l- c��yR Business Partnership Cily Match' A Memel P.son e.mob i.,coiMv la"n<M1ea a,e czr`=r'7 t HOW TO APPLY Bus ms pa RnenliP P�u9 M1rt P b a iQQ fir bus iieses-n Ne Gau My pl rviM1 wirm[ MA APPLICATIONS OPEN cwotsgales COVID-19 Rental Forgiven es.Program M1spmpamwuaP W aall oddWrman 111IIIIIILLL AUGUST 24,2020 "''P"`M1'a""'°"a'b"- M1n w Pamr n the La MYs Pmgram.Piwf"!par9cipati°n a reW ii� COMMUNITY RELIEF Please visit www.cityofre.us/RCCares PROGRAM t Counry.Ov--hipllant Business Partnership Clry Match DEADLINE TO SUBMIT Zim outdoor9uaineasOperations Quick Links APPLICATION PERIOD OPENS Assistance Program' August 24, outaoor e 2020 SEPTEMBER 4.2020 AT 5:00 P.M. asiness operanom au:iiie�can be retmburea or uP mszooQ far nem Assistance Program reNma mtraieituninq t°wtaxrbusinesupe ra4ms per For Rancho Cucamonga soeamunealN°'aee. .APPliez bezpe rcc Nat°ccu nee after JulY1.2Q2Q • RTER Residents&Businesses ONLY &REPKC Fi.DiWd A.`�"kk A k M A!I Ak,4 'A -71 For questions cr assistance.pimsecall P09]774{ARE(273]orerrmil RCCAPESOcityoFrcus August2020 ros, w u a+nm mtw» o-a r" 2.o.,i, T, u ta."rr.mlP�lu b. b agielkm�e.i'r'mk�e�a aay wni wgaanm nei�r,».tnetr«e.<ao,�o.<ii�.'nn teen rot�penaer3tWnAW e�meroero mt Rainq 4 pmry COVID-19 Financial Support H Pe"Oentsaw au.inezyes9o4Lv R �m.. .m FOR RENTERS&BUSINESSES COVID-19 COMMUNITY RELIEF To apply,visit: PROGRAM ® ay�woamrlM © © Cityofrc.us/RCCares o aaM war..me APPLICATION PERIOD OPENS August 24, 2020 �'Mraa wss owra4w: © RAN oHO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COVID-19 COMMUNITY RELIEF PROGRAM What do you get when . . . . . . • You sit through a series of five grueling I*to examinations (175 questions each over ==- p o•�� a 3-hour period) covering the major � disciplines of public finance : • Government Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting • Treasury and Investment Management • Debt Management • Operating and Capital Budgeting • Retirement & Benefits, Risk Management, and Procurement What do you get when . . . . . . • You are the inaugural participant to take the test online ( breaking new ground ) • You take the examinations over a 1.5-year period (even though you had seven years to actually complete them) • You study an average of 80 hours for each exam (a total of 400 hours of study time ! ) • You pass each of the examinations on the first try ! �, You become a . . . . . . Certified Public Finance Officer � • Congratulations to the City's 4 amazing Finance Manager t Noah Daniels, CPA for achieving the CPFO designation from the Government Finance Officers Association CPFO Certification Number: 826 IF ':TMA-HR - i- _ ��\� rstyaenuan�eun, k a: +; MA}HR Western Region r`ei4gti�on or liulman ResonrcesAssOcJa�l 0 2020 b , r Agency Award for Excellence href'eHted to W City of Rancho Cucamonga J May 2020-Anaheim,CA .PMA—HH TPMA-HR ea.Hn 2020ew CITY OF ♦ • CUCAMONGA -awl ,7, y _ i 3 1 . ? ;m � 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r �(�v1�J� 1 z L Y 1- z LL 21 ,r d I ---- I 41' LJ X- V Of. { L LL L L August 5, 2020 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES 4:30 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL • • ' DER - TRI-COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE • • The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday August 5, 2020, in the Tri- Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, and Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED • I PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSON CLOSED • No public communications were made. IITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No discussion or actions were taken. REE10b- CONDUCT OF CLOSED • TRI-COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE • • D.1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9789 MAIN STREET IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209-062-02-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CAROL NORRIS, NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. -CITY D.2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: State of California et al. ex rel. OnTheGo Wireless, LLC v. Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless, et al., Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2012-00127517 August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 10 Page 9 D.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7089 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES LORI SASSOON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE, TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH - CITY D.4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) - CITY D.5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. CIV IDS 1937969 D.6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: (1 CASE) The closed session recessed at 6:45 p.m. REGULAR MEETING - 00 CALL TO • ' DCOUNCIL The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on August 5, 2020 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, and Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney and Linda Troyan, Director of City Clerk Services. Council Member Spagnolo, led the Pledge of Allegiance. Responding to the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19), and social distancing requirements, City Manager Gillison announced that due to recent changes in the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of Rancho Cucamonga residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID-19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings and in place of in person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes live from the City's website or on RCTV-3. He stated members of the public wishing to speak during public communication, or on a public hearing item will need to dial in to (909)774-2751 to be added to the queue for comment. Additional information on the Coronavirus pandemic and City resources and updates can be found at www.cityofrc.us/coronavirus. August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 10 Page 10 A. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS A.1. Virtual Presentation of a Proclamation to Len Tavernetti, Service Officer, Chapter #2929, Declaring the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a Purple Heart City. Mayor Michael presented the Proclamation virtually to Military Order of the Purple Heart Member, Len Tavernetti, Service Officer, Chapter#2929. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Michael announced, due to COVID-19 and social distancing requirements, the Public Communications portion of the meeting will be conducted telephonically. Via phone call, Kathy Pryor, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, commended the City in its development over the years. Ms. Pryor spoke about the growing popularity of a sport named Pickleball, a paddleball sport that combines elements of tennis, badminton, and table tennis. She asked that the City Council consider adding more Pickleball Courts as well as requesting that the City explore the idea of converting current Tennis courts into Pickleball courts. Via phone call, Jeff Pryor, resident of Rancho Cucamonga, spoke about the City's response to racism and advised the City to consider building better Human Relations by forming a Human Relations Task Force. Via phone call, Janet Walton, offered a prayer. CONSENTCALENDARSC. • DAR - FIRE PROTECTION C.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of July 15, 2020. C.2. Consideration to Approve Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,122,993.33 and Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of $1,094,307.57 Dated July 06, 2020 Through July 26, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of June in the Amount of$667,029.42. C.3. Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Amount of$467.78 Dated July 06, 2020 Through July 26, 2020. CA. Consideration of a Three (3) Year Contract with PFM Asset Management LLC for Professional Investment Advisory Services with the Option to Renew the Contract for Two (2)Additional Years for a Total of Five (5)Years. C.5. Consideration to Approve and Award Conceptual Design Build Services to Mary McGrath Architects for the Fire Station 178 Towne Center Project in the Amount of$372,875. C.6. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with ESI Acquisitions, Inc. For the Purchase of Incident Management Software and Maintenance in the Amount of$24,000 for Fiscal Year 20/21 and a Total Contract Amount of$168,000 Over the Term of Seven Years. DRAFT August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 10 Page 11 C.7. Consideration to Approve the Use of a Cooperative Contract Through Omnia Partners Awarded by The City of Tuscon Contract #202329-01 to Network Services in Partnership with Waxie to Furnish Janitorial And Sanitation Supplies, Equipment, And Related Product For Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and Authorize the Use of Future Renewals As Awarded by City of Tucson Through Omnia Partners. C.B. Consideration to Approve the Use of a Contract Piggyback Opportunity Through the City of Redlands Awarded to Pinnacle Petroleum, PO-A003755 for the Purchase of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel and Authorize the Use of Future Renewals as Awarded by the City of Redlands. MOTION: Moved by Vice President Kennedy, seconded by Board Member Hutchison, to approve Consent Calendar Items C1. through C8. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0, with Board Member Scott abstaining on item C3, due to her employment with Southern California Gas Company. Items D1, E1, and F1 were taken concurrently. CONSENTD. • • ' AGENCY D.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of July 15, 2020. CONSENTE. • ' AGENCY E.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of July 15, 2020. CONSENTF. CALENDARPUBLIC FINANCINGAUTHORITY F.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of July 15, 2020. MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Scott, seconded by Agency Member Hutchison, to approve Consent Calendar Items D1, E1, and F1 of the Housing Successor, Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. CONSENTG. D ` ' COUNCIL G.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of July 15, 2020. G.2. Consideration to Approve Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $971,989.83 and Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of $4,599,236.94 Dated July 06, 2020 Through July 26, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of June in the Amount of$604,111.89. G.3. Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Amount of$1,607.48 Dated July 06, 2020 Through July 26, 2020. GA. Consideration of a Three (3) Year Contract with PFM Asset Management LLC for Professional Investment Advisory Services with the Option to Renew the Contract for Two (2)Additional Years for a Total of Five (5)Years. DRAFT August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 10 Page 12 G.S. Consideration to Approve the Final Map for Tract 19917,Associated Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for Public Improvements, and to Order Annexation Into Landscape Maintenance District 7 and Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 7 Related to the Development of Tract 19917 Located North of the 210 FWY and East of East Avenue, Submitted by Emaar Enterprise. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR CASE NO. SUBTT19917 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. SUBTT19917 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR CASE NO. SUBTT19917 G.6. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Amended Measure"I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan covering Fiscal Years 2019/2024. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2019/2024 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS G.7. Consideration to Approve the Use of a Contract Piggyback Opportunity Through the City of Redlands Awarded to Pinnacle Petroleum, PO-A003755 for the Purchase of Gasoline and Diesel Fuel and Authorize the Use of Future Renewals as Awarded by the City of Redlands. G.B. Consideration to Approve the Use of a Cooperative Contract Through Omnia Partners Awarded By The City of Tuscon Contract #202329-01 to Network Services in Partnership with Waxie to Furnish Janitorial And Sanitation Supplies, Equipment, And Related Product For Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and Authorize the Use of Future Renewals as Awarded By City Of Tucson Through Omnia Partners. G.9. Consideration to Accept the Emergency Management Performance Grant Revenue in the Amount of $26,835, Awarded by the California Office Of Emergency Services and Administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services, Fiscal Year 2019. G.10. Consideration of Modification to RC CARES Outdoor Dining Parking Lot Assistance Program to Allow for Participation by Additional Types of Businesses in Addition to Restaurants. G.11. Consideration to authorize the use of the current NASPO cooperative agreement with Cisco Systems to procure services with ConvergeOne, Inc for network related professional services. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve Consent Calendar Items G1 through G11 with Council Member Scott abstaining on item G3, due to her employment with Southern California Gas Company. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DRAFT August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 10 Page 13 CONSENTH. ORDINANCES H.1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 969, Amending Title 8 and Title 17 of the Municipal Code to Permit and Regulate Short-Term Rental at Residential Property. ORDINANCE NO. 969 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 AND TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO PERMIT AND REGULATE SHORT-TERM RENTAL AT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Scott, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 969 by title only. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 969 by title only. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Scott, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 969 by title only. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. HEARING1. ADMINISTRATIVE No items. COUNCILJ. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY J.1. PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017 00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018 00473 — PAUL BARDOS, APPLICANT. This Project Consists of a Site Plan and Architectural Review of a Proposed 4,118 Square Foot Two Story, Single Family Residence with an Attached 771 Square Foot Garage and a Request To Construct Retaining Walls Up To 5 Feet And 2 Inches High on a 15,430 Square Foot Lot Within The Low (L) Residential District And Within The Hillside Overlay District At 8035 Camino Predera APN: 020763103. A Minor Exception Was Also Requested to Exceed the Maximum Height Limit For Retaining Walls in the Zone. This Item Was Determined to be Exempt From The Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (B)(4)as a Project That Has Been Rejected or Disapproved (This Item Was Continued From The May 20, 2020 City Council Meeting).Public Hearing to be Continued to an unspecified date in the future at which time the items will be re-advertised. Mayor Michael announced the Public Hearing will be Continued to an unspecified date in the future at which time the items will be re-advertised. No public communications were made. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to continue the Public Hearing item to an unspecified date in the future at which time the items will be re-advertised. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 10 Page 14 J.2. Public Hearing for consideration of an Amendment to the 2020-21 Action Plan to allocate Community Development Block Grant funding from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security(CARES)Act and an Amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan. City Manager Gillison introduced the item and Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst Il,who provided a verbal report for item J2. Mr. Nunez informed that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive a total of$932,000 of CDBG-CV funds to use towards COVID-19 related emergencies such as Emergency Housing Assistance for qualifying residents. Mr. Nunez noted that the CDBG-CV grant funds would benefit the City with eligible projects to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. Mayor Michael announced, due to COVID-19 and social distancing requirements, Public Communications for Public Hearing item J2. will be conducted telephonically. No public communications were made. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve staff's recommendation and adopt an Amendment to the 2020-21 Action Plan to allocate Community Development Block Grant funding from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security(CARES)Act and an Amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. K. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS K.1. Consideration to Approve a Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of a Report Regarding the Fire District's Compliance with State-Mandated Inspection Requirements of Certain Occupancies in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. FD 2020-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT REGARDING THE DISTRICT'S COMPLIANCE WITH ANNUAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City Manager Gillison introduced the item and Robert Ball, Fire Marshall, who provided a verbal report for item K1 regarding the Fire District's compliance with State mandated inspection requirements of certain occupancies in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve Resolution No. FD2020-015, Acknowledging Receipt of a Report Regarding the Fire District's Compliance with State Mandated Inspection Requirements of Certain Occupancies in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DRAFT August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 10 Page 15 K.2. Presentation of Southern California Edison Reliability Report and Wildfire Prevention Strategy for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. City Manager Gillison introduced the item along with Southern California Edison Government Relations Manager, Mark Cloud, who presented the Southern California Edison Reliability Report for the city of Rancho Cucamonga via teleconference. Mr. Cloud shared the history of Southern California Edison along with an overview of their metrics used to measure reliability, grid, circuits, transformers and poles. He also spoke on Southern California Edison's vision to help California achieve a carbon neutral future through Carbon Neutrality which is achieved through deep decarbonization of electricity, transportation and building electrification and the use of low-carbon fuels. Mr. Cloud also addressed Southern California Edison's Wildfire Prevention Strategy including the installation of 161 Wildfire Cameras, Weather Monitoring Stations and Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS). Council Member Scott asked Mr. Cloud to clarify why the power to her home can be shut off while her neighbor's power remains on during a Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) event. Mr. Cloud answered by stating that Council Member Scott's neighbor may be at the beginning of a different circuit and that Southern California Edison is investing in resources to have a surgical approach when dealing with Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS). Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy thanked Mr. Cloud for his informative report and asked the following questions: 1.) Regarding Community Improvement Projects, will the projects require outages in order to engage in the work of improving circuits. 2.)The last Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) were excruciating to local businesses that did not expect the outages and pro-longed duration of outages, is there a way Southern California Edison can minimize where the outages take place as well as minimizing the duration of the outages to under four (4) hours and be more strategic as an organization to communicate effectively and in a timely manner to minimize the impact on local businesses, seniors dependent on medical equipment and students with distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to the first question, Mr. Cloud answered by stating that if the equipment needs to be de-energized for the safety of the workers, circuits would be de-energized as needed for safety. Responding to the second question, Mr. Cloud stated that Southern California Edison is fully aware of the inconvenience that Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) may cause to local businesses and residents. He stated that Southern California Edison is investing in collecting a great deal of information and data in hopes of refining future Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) as well as holding town hall meetings and community outreach events in hopes of balancing the needs of the community and safety in reducing the risks of wildfires. Mr. Cloud also encouraged residents relying on medical devices requiring energy to enroll in Southern California Edison's Customer Care contact list. Council Member Spagnolo asked if Southern California Edison will play a role in the electrification of public transportation. Mr. Cloud noted that Southern California Edison is working with the lead agencies in service territories in electrifying good movement operations at the ports and adding electric vehicle charging stations with municipalities and shopping centers. He closed by noting that Southern California Edison sees the electrification of public transportation as moving forward and is heavily investing in reducing the air pollution in California. DRAFT August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 8 of 10 Page 16 L. COUNCIL BUSINESS L.1. Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting. Council Consensus on Council Member Scott as voting delegate and Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy and Council Member Hutchison as alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting. L.2. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 970 and Ordinance No. 971, Ordinances Amending Title 2 of the Municipal Code to Define the Functions and Obligations of the City Clerk and City Treasurer. City Manager Gillison introduced the item and Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager /Administrative Services, who provided a verbal report for item L2. Ms. Sassoon reported that the proposed ordinances would clarify and document the roles of City Treasurer and City Clerk. ORDINANCE NO. 970 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DEFINING THE FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY CLERK ORDINANCE NO. 971 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DEFINING THE FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY TREASURER MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison to introduce First Reading of Ordinance No. 970 and Ordinance No. 971 by Title only and waive further readings. Linda A. Troyan, MMC, Director of City Clerk Services, read the title of Ordinance No. 970 and Ordinance No. 971. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison to introduce First Reading of Ordinance No. 970 and Ordinance No. 971 by Title only and waive further readings. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. L.3. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS None. LA. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES None. DRAFT August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 10 Page 17 M. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEms FOR NEXT MEETING N. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: DRAFT August 5, 2020 1 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 of 10 Page 18 Olt, DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Veronica Lopez SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Amount of$684,345.08 and Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of$1,090,405.43 Dated July 27, 2020 Through August 10, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of July 2020 in the Amount of$3,381,960.99. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Fire Board approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment - 1. Attachment - 2 Page 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00011019 07/27/2020 AHUMADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011020 07/27/2020 ALMAND,LLOYD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011021 07/27/2020 BANTAU,VICTORIA 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011022 07/27/2020 BAZAL,SUSAN 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00011023 07/27/2020 BELL,MICHAEL L 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011024 07/27/2020 BERRY,DAVID 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00011025 07/27/2020 BROCK,ROBIN 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011026 07/27/2020 CAMPBELL,GERALD 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00011027 07/27/2020 CAMPBELL,STEVEN 0.00 1,189.23 1,189.23 AP 00011028 07/27/2020 CARNES,KENNETH 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011029 07/27/2020 CLABBY,RICHARD 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00011030 07/27/2020 CLOUGHESY,DONALD R 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00011031 07/27/2020 CORCORAN,ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00011032 07/27/2020 COSTELLO,DENNIS M 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00011033 07/27/2020 COX,KARL 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011034 07/27/2020 CRANE,RALPH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011035 07/27/2020 CROSSLAND,WILBUR 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011036 07/27/2020 CURATALO,JAMES 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011037 07/27/2020 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00011038 07/27/2020 DE ANTONIO,SUSAN 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00011039 07/27/2020 DEANS,JACKIE 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00011040 07/27/2020 DOMINICK,SAMUEL A. 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011041 07/27/2020 EAGLESON,MICHAEL 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011042 07/27/2020 EGGERS,BOB 0.00 1,735.57 1,735.57 AP 00011043 07/27/2020 FEJERAN,TIM 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00011044 07/27/2020 FRITCHEY,JOHN D. 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011045 07/27/2020 HEYDE,DONALD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011046 07/27/2020 INTERLICCHIA,ROSALYN 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00011047 07/27/2020 JERKINS,PATRICK 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00011048 07/27/2020 KILMER,STEPHEN 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00011049 07/27/2020 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011050 07/27/2020 LARKIN,DAVID W 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00011051 07/27/2020 LEE,ALLAN J. 0.00 948.67 948.67 AP 00011052 07/27/2020 LENZE,PAUL E 0.00 1,487.34 1,487.34 AP 00011053 07/27/2020 LONCAR,PHILIP 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00011054 07/27/2020 LONGO,JOE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00011055 07/27/2020 LUTTRULL,DARRELL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011056 07/27/2020 MACKALL,BEVERLY 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00011057 07/27/2020 MAYFIELD,RON 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011058 07/27/2020 MCKEE,JOHN 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011059 07/27/2020 MCNEIL,KENNETH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011060 07/27/2020 MICHAEL,L.DENNIS 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011061 07/27/2020 MORGAN,BYRON 0.00 1,792.73 1,792.73 AP 00011062 07/27/2020 MYSKOW,DENNIS 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00011063 07/27/2020 NAUMAN,MICHAEL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011064 07/27/2020 NEE,RON 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00011065 07/27/2020 NELSON,MARY JANE 0.00 200.43 200.43 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wine: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00011066 07/27/2020 O'BRIEN,TOM 0.00 1,281.58 1,281.58 AP 00011067 07/27/2020 PLOUNG,MICHAEL J 0.00 563.78 563.78 AP 00011068 07/27/2020 POST,MICHAEL R 0.00 1,280.32 1,280.32 AP 00011069 07/27/2020 PROULX,PATRICK 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011070 07/27/2020 REDMOND,MIKE 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011071 07/27/2020 ROBERTS,BRENT 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00011072 07/27/2020 ROBERTS,CHERYL L 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00011073 07/27/2020 ROEDER,JEFF 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011074 07/27/2020 SALISBURY,THOMAS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011075 07/27/2020 SMITH,RONALD 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011076 07/27/2020 SORENSEN,SCOTT D 0.00 1,625.06 1,625.06 AP 00011077 07/27/2020 SPAGNOLO,SAM 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011078 07/27/2020 SPAIN,WILLIAM 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00011079 07/27/2020 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011080 07/27/2020 TAYLOR,STEVEN 0.00 1,975.24 1,975.24 AP 00011081 07/27/2020 TULEY,TERRY 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011082 07/27/2020 VANDERKALLEN,FRANCIS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011083 07/27/2020 VARNEY,ANTHONY 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011084 07/27/2020 WALTON,KEVIN 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00011085 07/27/2020 YOWELL,TIMOTHY A 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011086 07/29/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,471.35 0.00 23,471.35 AP 00011087 07/29/2020 GEOGRAPHICS 795.00 0.00 795.00 AP 00011088 07/29/2020 RCCEA 1,840.00 0.00 1,840.00 AP 00011089 07/29/2020 RCPFA 12,558.07 0.00 12,558.07 AP 00011090 07/29/2020 RIVERSIDE,CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00011091 07/29/2020 FEHR&PEERS 3,310.00 0.00 3,310.00 AP 00011092 07/30/2020 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 7,461.48 0.00 7,461.48 AP 00011093 07/30/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 897.77 0.00 897.77 AP 00011094 07/30/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 10,494.00 0.00 10,494.00 AP 00011095 07/30/2020 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 11,876.46 0.00 11,876.46 AP 00011096 07/30/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 5.55 5.55 AP 00011097 07/30/2020 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 0.00 486.94 486.94 AP 00011098 07/30/2020 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 0.00 1,369.14 1,369.14 AP 00011099 07/30/2020 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 1,572.29 0.00 1,572.29 AP 00011100 07/30/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 588.89 0.00 588.89 AP 00011101 07/30/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 783.98 0.00 783.98 AP 00011102 08/05/2020 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 12,056.97 0.00 12,056.97 AP 00011103 08/05/2020 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 526.32 0.00 526.32 AP 00011104 08/05/2020 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 113,481.82 0.00 113,481.82 AP 00011105 08/05/2020 MOFFATT&NICHOL 173,192.38 0.00 173,192.38 AP 00011106 08/05/2020 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 171,954.47 515,863.42 687,817.89 *** AP 00011107 08/05/2020 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 18,679.22 0.00 18,679.22 AP 00011108 08/05/2020 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 34,095.00 0.00 34,095.00 AP 00011109 08/05/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,935,059.53 0.00 2,935,059.53 AP 00011110 08/06/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 1,412.65 0.00 1,412.65 AP 00011111 08/06/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 52,874.97 0.00 52,874.97 AP 00011112 08/06/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,316.60 -26.38 1,290.22 *** User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page ilme: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00011113 08/06/2020 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 984.84 0.00 984.84 AP 00011114 08/06/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 2,950.17 0.00 2,950.17 AP 00011115 08/06/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 0.00 77.58 77.58 AP 00011116 08/06/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 5,775.00 0.00 5,775.00 AP 00411274 07/27/2020 KIRKPATRICK,WILLIAM 0.00 1,666.26 1,666.26 AP 00411275 07/27/2020 RODRIGUEZ,VICTOR 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00411276 07/27/2020 TOWNSEND,JAMES 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00411277 07/27/2020 WALKER,KENNETH 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00411278 07/29/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00411279 07/29/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 224.60 0.00 224.60 AP 00411280 07/29/2020 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 397.59 0.00 397.59 AP 00411281 07/29/2020 AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC 1,071.73 0.00 1,071.73 AP 00411282 07/29/2020 BERRY CONSTRUCTION 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00411283 07/29/2020 BINDU VARGHESE 4,200.00 0.00 4,200.00 AP 00411284 07/29/2020 BISHOP COMPANY 173.39 0.00 173.39 AP 00411285 07/29/2020 CA LLC-ALTA LAGUNA MHP 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00411286 07/29/2020 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73 AP 00411287 07/29/2020 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00411288 07/29/2020 CENGAGE LEARNING INC/GALE 3,027.64 0.00 3,027.64 AP 00411289 07/29/2020 CHAMPION AWARDS&SPECIALTIES 58.19 0.00 58.19 AP 00411290 07/29/2020 CHANG,TOM C 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00411291 07/29/2020 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 474.35 0.00 474.35 AP 00411292 07/29/2020 CHINO MOWER&ENGINE SERVICE 258.49 0.00 258.49 AP 00411293 07/29/2020 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 7,004.47 7,004.47 AP 00411294 07/29/2020 FAIRVIEW FORD INC 1,563.78 0.00 1,563.78 AP 00411295 07/29/2020 FLEET SERVICES INC 0.00 60.19 60.19 AP 00411296 07/29/2020 FRONTIER COMM 1,850.85 790.72 2,641.57 *** AP 00411297 07/29/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,339.54 0.00 3,339.54 AP 00411298 07/29/2020 GOVQA LLC 17,980.00 0.00 17,980.00 AP 00411299 07/29/2020 GRAINGER 0.00 4,332.18 4,332.18 AP 00411300 07/29/2020 GROVES ON FOOTHILL,THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00411301 07/29/2020 HDL SOFTWARE LLC 15,532.55 0.00 15,532.55 AP 00411302 07/29/2020 HI-WAY SAFETY INC 199.62 0.00 199.62 AP 00411303 07/29/2020 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00411304 07/29/2020 INLAND COUNTIES EMERGENCY MEDICAL AGENCY 0.00 7,600.00 7,600.00 AP 00411305 07/29/2020 INLAND DESERT SECURITY&COMMUNICATIONS INC 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00411306 07/29/2020 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 239,026.30 0.00 239,026.30 AP 00411307 07/29/2020 KING,ERINN 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00411308 07/29/2020 KRONOS INC 0.00 14,400.00 14,400.00 AP 00411309 07/29/2020 LANDIS,STEVEN 2,931.00 0.00 2,931.00 AP 00411310 07/29/2020 LOPEZ,ERICKA 155.52 0.00 155.52 AP 00411311 07/29/2020 MCCAIN,SARAH 802.52 0.00 802.52 AP 00411312 07/29/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 107.58 1,232.82 1,340.40 *** AP 00411313 07/29/2020 PARSAC 388,505.00 0.00 388,505.00 AP 00411314 07/29/2020 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK,THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00411315 07/29/2020 PLANETBIDS INC 17,730.00 0.00 17,730.00 AP 00411316 07/29/2020 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wme: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411317 07/29/2020 QUADIENT INC 270.23 0.00 270.23 AP 00411318 07/29/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,637.76 0.00 2,637.76 AP 00411319 07/29/2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,333.34 0.00 3,333.34 AP 00411320 07/29/2020 REDROCK DEVELOPMENT INC 8,533.00 0.00 8,533.00 AP 00411321 07/29/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00411322 07/29/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00411323 07/29/2020 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00411324 07/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 720.00 720.00 AP 00411325 07/29/2020 SBPEA 2,473.67 0.00 2,473.67 AP 00411327 07/29/2020 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC 416.10 0.00 416.10 AP 00411335 07/29/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,518.49 1,556.96 14,075.45 *** AP 00411336 07/29/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.00 1,951.45 1,951.45 AP 00411337 07/29/2020 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00411338 07/29/2020 TAYLOR,SAMANTHA 545.04 0.00 545.04 AP 00411339 07/29/2020 TIMBERWOLFF CONSTRUCTION 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00411340 07/29/2020 TRANSWEST TRUCK CENTER 0.00 1,096.34 1,096.34 AP 00411341 07/29/2020 UNITED WAY 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00411342 07/29/2020 UPS 92.46 0.00 92.46 AP 00411343 07/29/2020 VAN DAELE HOMES CORPORATION 350.07 0.00 350.07 AP 00411344 07/29/2020 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS LLC 30,186.00 0.00 30,186.00 AP 00411345 07/29/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 0.00 3,513.04 3,513.04 AP 00411346 07/29/2020 WE TIP INC 8,826.70 0.00 8,826.70 AP 00411347 07/29/2020 ALTUM GROUP,THE 1,711.50 0.00 1,711.50 AP 00411348 07/29/2020 ARAGON,HEATHER 176.04 0.00 176.04 AP 00411349 07/29/2020 ASSI SECURITY 6,900.00 0.00 6,900.00 AP 00411350 07/29/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,160.00 0.00 3,160.00 AP 00411351 07/29/2020 BAKER&TAYLOR LLC 7,527.42 0.00 7,527.42 AP 00411352 07/29/2020 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 105.59 105.59 AP 00411353 07/29/2020 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 85.80 0.00 85.80 AP 00411354 07/29/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 6,768.56 0.00 6,768.56 AP 00411355 07/29/2020 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 393.00 0.00 393.00 AP 00411363 07/29/2020 C V W D 216,643.47 919.36 217,562.83 *** AP 00411364 07/29/2020 CASTANEDA,MIGUEL 320.06 0.00 320.06 AP 00411365 07/29/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 37.51 37.51 AP 00411366 07/29/2020 COAST RECREATION INC 133.57 0.00 133.57 AP 00411367 07/29/2020 CONOR CONSULTING LLC 712.50 0.00 712.50 AP 00411368 07/29/2020 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 997.36 0.00 997.36 AP 00411369 07/29/2020 CRAYON SOFTWARE EXPERTS LLC 324,813.48 37,520.00 362,333.48 *** AP 00411370 07/29/2020 CURTIS J DAHLE ARCHITECT 677.81 0.00 677.81 AP 00411371 07/29/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0.00 98.00 98.00 AP 00411372 07/29/2020 DHEKANE,GAYATRI 137.60 0.00 137.60 AP 00411373 07/29/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 2,540.00 0.00 2,540.00 AP 00411374 07/29/2020 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY 0.00 75.00 75.00 AP 00411375 07/29/2020 FAKIH,ZEINA B 124.32 0.00 124.32 AP 00411376 07/29/2020 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION 0.00 759.64 759.64 AP 00411377 07/29/2020 GOUDA,SHEREEN 1,256.70 0.00 1,256.70 AP 00411378 07/29/2020 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,363.99 0.00 1,363.99 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page fine: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411379 07/29/2020 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 4,969.87 4,969.87 AP 00411380 07/29/2020 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 6,452.50 0.00 6,452.50 AP 00411381 07/29/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 44,445.02 0.00 44,445.02 AP 00411382 07/29/2020 INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL COMPOSTING AUTHORITY 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00411383 07/29/2020 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 5,614.00 0.00 5,614.00 AP 00411384 07/29/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 1,044.00 27,276.60 28,320.60 *** AP 00411385 07/29/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 7,585.00 0.00 7,585.00 AP 00411386 07/29/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 1,662.46 0.00 1,662.46 AP 00411387 07/29/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 1,242.64 0.00 1,242.64 AP 00411388 07/29/2020 ONTRAC 52.88 0.00 52.88 AP 00411389 07/29/2020 PARKES,DR KEVIN 0.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 AP 00411390 07/29/2020 PFINIX CREATIVE GROUP 13,940.00 0.00 13,940.00 AP 00411391 07/29/2020 QUADIENT INC 270.23 0.00 270.23 AP 00411392 07/29/2020 RUTHERIG,ROBYN 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00411393 07/29/2020 RYLANDER,RICHARD 87.00 0.00 87.00 AP 00411394 07/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 13,266.27 13,266.27 AP 00411395 07/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 60.81 0.00 60.81 AP 00411396 07/29/2020 SC FUELS 19,912.21 0.00 19,912.21 AP 00411397 07/29/2020 SILVER&WRIGHT LLP 3,001.91 0.00 3,001.91 AP 00411398 07/29/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 2,656.30 366.20 3,022.50 *** AP 00411399 07/29/2020 STEFFEN,MELINDA 87.00 0.00 87.00 AP 00411400 07/29/2020 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 576.22 576.22 AP 00411401 07/29/2020 UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF INLAND EMPIRE 504.00 0.00 504.00 AP 00411402 07/29/2020 UPS 70.33 0.00 70.33 AP 00411403 07/29/2020 URBAN ARENA 7.87 0.00 7.87 AP 00411404 07/29/2020 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00411405 07/29/2020 WANG,CHENG 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00411406 07/29/2020 WEBER,KATHERINE 148.08 0.00 148.08 AP 00411407 07/29/2020 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 0.00 3,175.00 3,175.00 AP 00411408 07/29/2020 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 842.97 842.97 AP 00411409 07/29/2020 YOUNGER,SAKURA 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00411410 08/05/2020 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,099.40 0.00 1,099.40 AP 00411411 08/05/2020 AGRI-TURF DISTRIBUTING LLC 2,604.57 0.00 2,604.57 AP 00411412 08/05/2020 ARGIL DE MONTANO,ZAIRA 901.00 0.00 901.00 AP 00411413 08/05/2020 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 2,834.44 0.00 2,834.44 AP 00411414 08/05/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 20,450.00 0.00 20,450.00 AP 00411415 08/05/2020 BAKER&TAYLOR LLC 1,934.15 0.00 1,934.15 AP 00411416 08/05/2020 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS CORP 0.00 1,116.91 1,116.91 AP 00411417 08/05/2020 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS CORP 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00411418 08/05/2020 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00411419 08/05/2020 COLLINS COLLINS MUIR&STEWART LLP 13,223.85 0.00 13,223.85 AP 00411420 08/05/2020 DEKRA-LITE 11,059.74 0.00 11,059.74 AP 00411421 08/05/2020 ELITE CUSTOMS CONSTRUCTION 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00411422 08/05/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 58.05 0.00 58.05 AP 00411423 08/05/2020 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84 AP 00411424 08/05/2020 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 20,272.44 20,272.44 AP 00411425 08/05/2020 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 45,009.75 0.00 45,009.75 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wine: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411426 08/05/2020 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 331,965.55 0.00 331,965.55 AP 00411427 08/05/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 0.00 1,793.30 1,793.30 AP 00411428 08/05/2020 IPERMIT 236.48 0.00 236.48 AP 00411429 08/05/2020 LANDSCAPE WEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 66,464.81 0.00 66,464.81 AP 00411430 08/05/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 3,184.00 0.00 3,184.00 AP 00411431 08/05/2020 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 333.20 333.20 AP 00411432 08/05/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 19,885.58 0.00 19,885.58 AP 00411433 08/05/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 145.54 0.00 145.54 AP 00411434 08/05/2020 MDG ASSOCIATES INC 27,652.50 0.00 27,652.50 AP 00411435 08/05/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 979.26 0.00 979.26 AP 00411436 08/05/2020 NEW COLOR PRINTING 1,185.25 0.00 1,185.25 AP 00411437 08/05/2020 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 154,757.00 0.00 154,757.00 AP 00411438 08/05/2020 PACIFIC WESTERN BANK 9,050.24 27,150.70 36,200.94 *** AP 00411439 08/05/2020 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00411440 08/05/2020 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 2,760.00 2,760.00 AP 00411441 08/05/2020 PLACEWORKS 5,472.31 0.00 5,472.31 AP 00411442 08/05/2020 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 135.78 135.78 AP 00411443 08/05/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 16,419.24 0.00 16,419.24 AP 00411444 08/05/2020 SILVER&WRIGHT LLP 7,214.80 0.00 7,214.80 AP 00411445 08/05/2020 SIRSIDYNIX 3,988.28 0.00 3,988.28 AP 00411447 08/05/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,354.48 366.20 1,720.68 *** AP 00411448 08/05/2020 SOCIAL IMPACT ARTISTS-TSIA,THE 6,400.00 0.00 6,400.00 AP 00411449 08/05/2020 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 137.63 137.63 AP 00411450 08/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,301.21 0.00 2,301.21 AP 00411451 08/05/2020 SUPERION LLC 1,760.00 0.00 1,760.00 AP 00411452 08/05/2020 TOMCO LLC 3,690.00 0.00 3,690.00 AP 00411453 08/05/2020 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY 0.00 23.49 23.49 AP 00411454 08/05/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 242.58 0.00 242.58 AP 00411455 08/05/2020 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 46,120.00 0.00 46,120.00 AP 00411456 08/05/2020 ALL WELDING 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00411457 08/05/2020 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 3,863.62 0.00 3,863.62 AP 00411458 08/05/2020 AMADOR,GILBERT 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00411459 08/05/2020 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 32.27 0.00 32.27 AP 00411460 08/05/2020 BEESON,STACEE 59.43 0.00 59.43 AP 00411461 08/05/2020 BEST SOLAR POWER INC 179.11 0.00 179.11 AP 00411462 08/05/2020 BLACKBAUD 9,758.13 0.00 9,758.13 AP 00411463 08/05/2020 C P GENERATOR INC 129.30 0.00 129.30 AP 00411464 08/05/2020 C V W D 808.05 313.93 1,121.98 *** AP 00411468 08/05/2020 C V W D 55,383.27 785.37 56,168.64 *** AP 00411469 08/05/2020 CAI,RAN 52.25 0.00 52.25 AP 00411470 08/05/2020 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS CORP 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00411471 08/05/2020 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,529.39 6,411.82 10,941.21 *** AP 00411473 08/05/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,747.23 1,389.98 4,137.21 *** AP 00411474 08/05/2020 DAISYECO INC 574.14 0.00 574.14 AP 00411475 08/05/2020 DEKRA-LITE 213.15 0.00 213.15 AP 00411476 08/05/2020 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL 265.00 0.00 265.00 AP 00411477 08/05/2020 DUDE SOLUTIONS INC 16,890.00 0.00 16,890.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page ifme: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411478 08/05/2020 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 213.35 0.00 213.35 AP 00411479 08/05/2020 ELITE CUSTOMS CONSTRUCTION 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00411480 08/05/2020 ERICKSON-HALL CONSTRUCTION CO 0.00 78,491.25 78,491.25 AP 00411481 08/05/2020 FAIRVIEW FORD INC 1,073.78 0.00 1,073.78 AP 00411482 08/05/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 60.30 0.00 60.30 AP 00411483 08/05/2020 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 1,800.00 0.00 1,800.00 AP 00411484 08/05/2020 GLENN,WILLIE 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00411485 08/05/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC 371.74 0.00 371.74 AP 00411486 08/05/2020 GUTIERREZ,GABRIELLA 80.84 0.00 80.84 AP 00411487 08/05/2020 HANSEN,BARBARA 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00411488 08/05/2020 HONDA YAMAHA HUSQVARNA OF REDLANDS 323.12 0.00 323.12 AP 00411489 08/05/2020 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 6,500.00 0.00 6,500.00 AP 00411490 08/05/2020 INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM 1,931.00 0.00 1,931.00 AP 00411491 08/05/2020 INTELESYS 140.00 0.00 140.00 AP 00411492 08/05/2020 IVANTI INC 30,820.00 0.00 30,820.00 AP 00411493 08/05/2020 K-K WOODWORKING 53.82 0.00 53.82 AP 00411494 08/05/2020 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 138.69 0.00 138.69 AP 00411495 08/05/2020 MANGO LANGUAGES 10,729.00 0.00 10,729.00 AP 00411496 08/05/2020 MARQUEZ,ED 58.67 0.00 58.67 AP 00411497 08/05/2020 MCCAININC 3,673.12 0.00 3,673.12 AP 00411498 08/05/2020 MCI 34.88 0.00 34.88 AP 00411499 08/05/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 416.72 0.00 416.72 AP 00411500 08/05/2020 MCMURRAY STERN INC 0.00 950.00 950.00 AP 00411501 08/05/2020 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 922.76 922.76 AP 00411502 08/05/2020 NAJERA,HECTOR 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00411503 08/05/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 103.44 174.54 277.98 *** AP 00411504 08/05/2020 NEARMAP US INC 20,820.00 3,180.00 24,000.00 *** AP 00411505 08/05/2020 NETFILE 12,600.00 0.00 12,600.00 AP 00411506 08/05/2020 OMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC 0.00 14,465.00 14,465.00 AP 00411507 08/05/2020 ONTARIO,CITY OF 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 AP 00411508 08/05/2020 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00411509 08/05/2020 PARSAC 0.00 135,288.00 135,288.00 AP 00411510 08/05/2020 PASHA MANAGEMENT 44.90 0.00 44.90 AP 00411511 08/05/2020 PEP BOYS 61.20 0.00 61.20 AP 00411512 08/05/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 777.47 0.00 777.47 AP 00411513 08/05/2020 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 199.75 0.00 199.75 AP 00411514 08/05/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 135.04 0.00 135.04 AP 00411515 08/05/2020 RGB RICE GENERAL BUILDING 12,665.88 0.00 12,665.88 AP 00411516 08/05/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 5,460.00 0.00 5,460.00 AP 00411517 08/05/2020 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 711.98 711.98 AP 00411518 08/05/2020 SAN MARINO ROOF CO INC 0.00 15,956.00 15,956.00 AP 00411519 08/05/2020 SC FUELS 0.00 13,252.23 13,252.23 AP 00411520 08/05/2020 SHRED PROS 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00411523 08/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11,634.12 1,079.80 12,713.92 *** AP 00411524 08/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.41 0.00 37.41 AP 00411525 08/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,508.68 0.00 14,508.68 AP 00411526 08/05/2020 SU,KAIHONG 3.96 0.00 3.96 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wine: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411527 08/05/2020 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00411528 08/05/2020 TIREHUB LLC 0.00 455.20 455.20 AP 00411529 08/05/2020 TORO TOWING 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00411530 08/05/2020 TUTOR.COM INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00411531 08/05/2020 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 15,140.61 0.00 15,140.61 AP 00411532 08/05/2020 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 21,793.72 0.00 21,793.72 AP 00411533 08/05/2020 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,096.45 0.00 1,096.45 AP 00411534 08/05/2020 UPS 31.00 0.00 31.00 AP 00411535 08/05/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 0.00 4,973.12 4,973.12 AP 00411536 08/05/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 0.00 49.03 49.03 AP 00411537 08/05/2020 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00 Total City: $6,218,315.13 Total Fire: $1,090,405.43 Grand Total: , Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wine: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 7/1 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 5,584.05 5,584.05 7/1 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 2,782.50 2,782.50 7/1 U.S.BANK-Purchasing Card Payment 20,569.81 11,586.16 32,155.97 7/1 U.S.BANK-Corporate Card Payment 48,569.06 17,242.21 65,811.27 7/1 U.S.BANK-Costco Card Payment - 207.27 207.27 7/2 Bank Fee 78.45 78.45 7/2 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 2,476.80 2,476.80 7/2 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 11,188.80 11,188.80 7/2 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 12,811.20 12,811.20 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 259.20 259.20 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 288.00 288.00 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 460.80 460.80 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 782.40 782.40 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 1,228.80 1,228.80 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,700.80 3,700.80 7/2 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 268.38 268.38 7/2 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 12,147.00 12,147.00 7/3 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 95.33 95.33 7/6 WIRE PAYMENT-DEPOSIT FOR PROPERTY 55,500.00 55,500.00 7/6 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 357.02 357.02 7/6 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 2,303.18 2,303.18 7/7 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 580.00 580.00 7/8 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 3,772,801.00 3,772,801.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,795.00 2,795.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,121.00 3,121.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 4,600.00 4,600.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 15,250.00 15,250.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 192,481.00 192,481.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,525,072.00 2,525,072.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 588.04 588.04 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 690.63 690.63 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,141.68 3,141.68 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 29,874.22 29,874.22 7/8 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 2,502.76 2,502.76 7/9 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 1,270.44 1,270.44 7/10 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 53,262.61 53,262.61 7/10 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 112,452.33 112,452.33 7/10 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 80,750.00 80,750.00 7/13 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 14,254.00 14,254.00 7/14 WIRE PAYMENT-RCMU CAISO 56,674.77 56,674.77 7/14 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 12.00 12.00 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 1,767.90 1,767.90 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,689.32 2,689.32 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,704.82 2,704.82 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,239.32 3,239.32 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 5,171.06 5,171.06 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 10,060.01 10,060.01 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 12,971.71 12,971.71 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 23,756.92 23,756.92 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 113,997.06 113,997.06 7/15 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 722.20 722.20 7/15 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 580.00 580.00 7/16 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 5,224.32 5,224.32 7/16 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 2,782.50 2,782.50 7/16 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 1,094.61 1,094.61 7/16 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 1,828.99 1,828.99 a, Page 28 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 7/17 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 1,336.34 1,336.34 7/17 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 3,070.43 3,070.43 7/20 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 1,061.97 1,061.97 7/20 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 1,265.07 1,265.07 7/21 WIRE PAYMENT-PURCHASE OF PROPERTY 1,795,924.26 1,795,924.26 7/21 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 580.00 580.00 7/22 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 176,129.60 176,129.60 7/22 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 2,242.24 2,242.24 7/22 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 730.40 730.40 7/23 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 6,007.28 6,007.28 7/23 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 6,538.24 6,538.24 7/24 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 127.83 127.83 7/24 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 681.51 681.51 7/27 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 368.25 368.25 7/28 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 189.90 189.90 7/29 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 239.32 239.32 7/30 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 4,288.13 4,288.13 7/30 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 536.96 536.96 7/30 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 4,068.50 4,068.50 7/31 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 54,289.58 54,289.58 7/31 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 112,342.89 112,342.89 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,651.91 2,651.91 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,261.31 3,261.31 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 5,171.06 5,171.06 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 10,451.50 10,451.50 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 24,228.89 24,228.89 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 117,934.48 117,934.48 7/31 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 70.95 70.95 7/31 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 325.00 325.00 TOTAL CITY 6,225,404.25 TOTAL FIRE 3,381,960.99 GRAND TOTAL 9,607,365.24 2 Page 29 Olt, DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Veronica Lopez SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Amount of$310.87 Dated July 27, 2020 Through August 10, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Fire Board approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment - 1. Page 30 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411326 07/29/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,112.80 310.87 5,423.67 *** AP 00411446 08/05/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,115.17 0.00 1,115.17 Total City: $6,227.97 Total Fire: $310.87 Grand Total: . Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Vine: 09:52:02 Olt, DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Department Manager SUBJECT: Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the President and Members of the Board of Directors receive and file the attached current investment schedule for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as of July 31, 2020. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedule as of July 31, 2020, reflects cash and investments managed by the Finance Department/Revenue Management Division and is in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's adopted Investment Policy as approved by the President and Members of the Board of Directors on June 25, 2020. ANALYSIS: The District's Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly investment report to the President and Members of the Board of Directors in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the District Treasurer has elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment - 1 Page 32 City of Rancho Cucamonga R. C. Fire Protection District lip Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary July 31, 2020 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Fund 32,372,466,95 32,372,466.95 32,372,466.95 49.01 1 1 0.9D7 0.920 Certificates of Deposit-Bank 490,00a.o0 490,000.00 490,000.00 0.74 1.644 1,639 0.493 0.500 Passbook/CheckingAccounts 1,694,064.28 1,694,064.28 1,694,064.28 2,56 1 1 0.197 0200 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 28,500.000,00 28,632,149.21 28,500,128.88 43.15 1,627 1,000 1,728 1.752 Treasury Securities-Coupon 1,500,000.00 1,507,335.00 1,500,000.00 2.27 1.461 121 1.603 1.625 Supranational Securities 1,500,000.00 1,506,859.59 1,500,000.00 2.27 1,827 1,570 2.130 2.160 Investments 66,056,531.23 66,202,875.03 66,056,660.11 100.00% 789 482 1.284 1.301 Cash and Accrued Interest Accrued Interest at Purchase 895.00 895.00 Subtotal 895.00 895.00 Total Cash and Investments 66,066,531.23 66,203,770.03 66,067,656.11 789 482 1.284 1.301 Total Earnings July 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 87,628.76 87,628.76 Average Daily Balance 68,708,247.36 68,708,247.35 Effective Rate of Return 1.50% 1.50% 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all District pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted June 25,2020. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from(IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. (a�� All g2 D Lori E.Sassoon,Treasurer Reporting period 0710112020-0713112020 Portfolio FIRE AP Run Date:OB11112020-1 7:18 PM(PRF_PM1)7.3.0 Report Ver.7.3.6.1     Page 33 R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Page 1 Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Maturity Date Local Agency Investment Fund SYS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 32.372,466.95 32,372,466,95 32,372,466.95 0.920 0,920 1 Subtotal and Average 33,561,219.34 32,372,466.95 32,372,466.95 32,372,466.95 0.920 1 Certificates of Deposit-Bank 29278TQD5 1136 ENERBANK USA 07/24/2020 245,000.00 245.000.00 245,000.00 0.450 0.450 1.453 07/24/2024 58404DHQ7 1137 MEDALLION BK UTAH 07/30/2020 245,000.00 245.000,00 245,000.00 0.550 R550 1,824 07/30/2025 Subtotal and Average 79,032.26 490,000.00 490,000.00 490,000.00 0.500 1,639 Pass boo WChecking Accounts SYS0002 0002 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 1,694.064,28 1,694,064.28 1,694,064.28 0.200 P-1 0.200 1 Subtotal and Average 246,190.14 1,694,064.28 1,694,064.28 1,694,064.28 0.200 1 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3130AAQU5 1100 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/30/2017 2.000,000.00 2,008,016.44 2,000,000.00 1.800 Aaa 1.800 90 10/30/2020 3130A9VU2 1097 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/25/2016 2,000,000.00 2,007,758.84 2,000,000.00 1.350 Aaa 1350 115 11/24/2020 3136G3QQ1 1088 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/25/2016 1.500.000.00 1.506,300.38 1,500,000,00 1.500 Aaa 1.500 116 11/25/2020 3134G9PV3 1090 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP 05/27/2016 2,000,000.00 2,023,355.76 2,000.000.00 1.550 Aaa 1.550 299 05/27/2021 3136G3H65 1096 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/28/2016 1,500,000.00 1,518,484.25 1,500,000.00 1.400 Aaa 1.400 361 07/28/2021 3133EHHH9 1104 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05102/2017 1,000,000.00 1,030.247,12 999,298.89 1.920 Aaa 1.962 639 05/02/2022 3134G0007 1124 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP 1111212019 2,500,000.00 2,500,969.58 2.500,000.00 1.876 Aaa 1.B75 1.014 05/12/2023 3136G4UE1 1127 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/13/2020 3,000,000.00 3,001,133.28 3,000,00000 1.730 Aaa 1.730 1,199 11/13/2023 3130AJ7G8 1131 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/26/2020 2,000,000.00 2,001,286,72 2,000,606.81 1.730 Aaa 1.721 1,304 02/26/2024 3130AJ5A3 1130 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02M912020 1,500.000.00 1,509,540.41 1,500.000.00 1140 Aaa 1.740 1,479 OBY19/2024 3133EKH41 1118 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/03/2019 2,500,000.00 2,501,760.85 2,600,000.00 2.000 Aaa 2000. 1,494 09/0312024 3134GURZ5 1121 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP 11/18/2019 2,000,000.00 2.009,264.34 2,000,000.00 2.030 Aaa 2.030 1,570 11/18/2024 3133ELLKS 1128 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/13/2020 2,000,000.00 2,012,495.48 1,999,546.90 1.790 Aaa 1.795 1,648 02/04/2025 3135GOY23 1129 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02M812020 2,000,000.00 2,001,03042 2,000,000.00 1.900 Aaa 1.900 1,662 02/18/2025 3136G4UJO 1132 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/2612020 1,000,000.00 1,000.505,34 1,000,876.28 1.850 Aaa 1.834 1,670 02/26/2025 Subtotal and Average 31,821,905.61 28,500,000.00 28,632,149.21 28,500,128.88 1.752 1,000 Treasury securities-Coupon 912628M98 1099 US TREASURY NOTE 11/3012016 1,500,000.00 1.507,335.00 1,500,000.00 1.625 Aaa 1.525 121 11/30/2020 Subtotal and Average 1,500,000.00 1,600,000.00 1,507,335.00 1,500,000.00 1.625 121 Portfolio FIRE Run Date:08/1 112 020-05:55 AP PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 &nbs Report Ver.7.3.6.1   Page 34 R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details- Investments July 31, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Maturity Date Supranational Securities 459D58HQ9 1123 INTL BANK RECONSTRUCTION&DEV 11/16/2019 1,500,000.00 1,506,859.59 1,500,000.00 2.160 Aaa 2.160 1,570 11118/2024 Subtotal and Average 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,606,869.59 1,500,000.00 2.160 1,570 Total and Average 68,708,247.35 66,056,531.23 66,202,875.03 66,056,660.11 1.301 482 Portfolio FIRE AP Run Dale.08111/2020-05:55 PM(PRF_PM2)73 0     Page 35 R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details-Cash July 31, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Maturity Average Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 895.00 8.95.00 0 Subtotal 895.00 695.00 Total Cash and Investments 68,708,247.35 66,056,531.23 66,203,770.03 66,057,555.11 1.301 482 Portfolio FIRE AP Run Date 0811 IJ2020-0555 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0     Page 36 R. C. Fire Protection District Portfolio Management Page 1 Activity By Type July 1, 2020 through July 31, 2020 Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions CUSIP Investment# Issuer Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS0001 0001 LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 0.920 4,603,476.86 8,800,000.00 Subtotal 4,603,476.86 8,800,000.00 32,372,466.95 Certificates of Deposit-Bank 29278TQD5 1136 ENERBANK USA 0.450 07124/202/) 245,000.00 0.00 58404DHQ7 1137 MEDALLION BK UTAH 0.550 07130/2020 245,0D0.00 0.00 Subtotal 490,000.00 0.00 490,000.00 PassbooklChecking Accounts {Monthly Summary) SYS0002 0002 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 0.200 1,496,136.61 0.00 Subtotal 1,496,136.61 0.00 1,694,064.28 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3133ELJF2 1125 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 1.830 07/2212020 0.00 2,998,686.59 3130AHWB5 1126 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2000. 07/2112020 0.00 2,000,000.00 Subtotal 0.00 4,998,686.69 28,600,128.88 Treasury Securities-Coupon Subtotal 1,500,000.00 Supranational Securities Subtotal 1,500,000.00 Total 6,589,613.47 13,798,686.59 66,056,660.11 Portfolio FIRE AP Run Dale:08111/2020-05:55 PM(PRF_PM3)7.3.0 Report Ver.7.3.6.1     Page 37 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Portfolio Composition July 31, 2020 Supranational Securities 2.27% US Treasury Securities- Coupon 227% Federal Agency Issues- Coupon 43.14% Local Agency Investment Fund 49.01% Certificates of Deposit- Passbook/Checking Bank Accounts 0.74% 2.56%     Page 38 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Portfolio Maturity Distribution July 31, 2020 60,00% 52.30% 50,00% - - - 40.00% - 30.00% 20 00% ° 15.66% 10.00% - - 7.82% 3.73% 1.49% 0 00% Under 6 Months 6-12 Months 1 -2 Years 2 -3 Years 3 -4 Years 4-5 Years Note: Callable securities in portfolio are included in the maturity distribution analysis to their stated maturity date,although they may be called prior to maturity.     Page 39 01 Sir DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the use of OMNIA Partners Cooperative Agreement with Grainger for the Procurement of Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO) Supplies, Parts, Equipment, Materials, and Related Services and Authorize the use of Future Renewals as Awarded by City of Tucson, to be Funded by Various Account Numbers, in Accordance with the Adopted Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board of Supervisors approve the use of a cooperative Contract through OMNIA Partners awarded by City of Tucson Contract Number#192163, to Grainger to procure maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services for Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and authorize staff to utilize future renewals as awarded by City of Tucson and OMNIA Partners, to be funded by various citywide account numbers in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets. BACKGROUND: As part of routine operations, the City procures and utilizes supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services, on a daily basis. In order to ensure availability and control costs, the Procurement Division oversees the procurement of these supplies under managed contracts with agreed to pricing and conditions for fulfillment. Staff was advised that the current cooperative agreement utilized for maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services is expiring and not going to be renewed. The Procurement Division has identified a viable cooperative procurement option with OMNIA Partners for maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services. A new agreement has been awarded to Grainger by the City of Tucson, through a solicitation that was competitively bid and awarded. ANALYSIS: Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal Code (RCMC), Section 3.08.070, the City may award contracts when the purchase is beneficial to the interest of the City and is from a supplier who has been awarded a specific item or items in a contract resulting from a formal competitive bid process by another governmental agency within the State of California or by the federal government within the last year. OMNIA Partners provides access to cooperative contracts such as the competitively bid and awarded contract of City of Tucson with Grainger which allows other agencies to participate in the contract and receive discounted volume pricing. Staff has reviewed the contract Terms and Conditions and is satisfied that they are in alignment with and meet the City's requirements. Page 40 Staff recommends that Fire Board authorize the purchase of maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services for fiscal year 202O/2021 from OMNIA Partners, for Grainger utilizing the City of Tucson, Contract Number #192163 through OMNIA Partners for the respective supplies available on the contract. The contract term has an effective date of July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2022, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one-year periods through December 31, 2024. Staff also recommends authorizing expenditures in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets from various citywide accounts. FISCAL IMPACT: To date, FY 2019/2020 expenditures through Grainger totaled $67,307. There would be no fiscal impact beyond that which has already been budgeted in the FY 2020/2021 adopted budget. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Authorizing the use of the proposed cooperative agreement supports Council's core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future and fostering continuous improvement. Continuing to utilize a cooperative contract to efficiently procure goods and services required for maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) manages future costs by providing pre-determined discounts and provides adequate flexibility to respond effectively and efficiently to unforeseen needs. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 41 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT7mm DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the use of a Cooperative Contract Through OMNIA Partners Awarded by the City of Tamarac Contract#19-12R to Office Depot for the Procurement of Office Supplies, Products and Related Services for Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and Authorize the use of Future Renewals as Awarded by the City of Tamarac Through Omnia Partners. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve the use of a cooperative contract through OMNIA Partners awarded by City of Tamarac Contract Number#19-12R, to Office Depot to procure office supplies, products and related services for Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and authorize staff to utilize future renewals as awarded by City of Tamarac and OMNIA Partners, to be funded by various citywide account numbers in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets. BACKGROUND: As part of routine operations, the City procures and utilizes office supplies daily. In order to ensure availability of supplies and control costs, the Procurement Division oversees the procurement of these office supplies under managed cooperative contracts with agreed to pricing and conditions for fulfillment. Staff was advised that the current cooperative agreement utilized for office supplies, products and related services is expiring and not going to be renewed. The Procurement Division has identified a viable cooperative procurement option with OMNIA Partners for office supplies, products and related services. A new agreement has been awarded to Office Depot by the City of Tamarac, through a solicitation that was competitively bid and awarded. The City currently has an electronic system in place that allows users to order a variety of office supplies including paper and printer toner cartridges through Office Depot. ANALYSIS: Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal Code (RCMC), Section 3.08.070, the City may award contracts when the purchase is beneficial to the interest of the City and is from a supplier who has been awarded a specific item or items in a contract resulting from a formal competitive bid process by another governmental agency within the State of California or by the federal government within the last year. OMNIA Partners provides access to cooperative contracts such as the competitively bid and awarded contract of City of Tamarac with Office Depot which allows other agencies to participate in the contract and receive discounted volume pricing. Staff has reviewed the contract Terms and Conditions and is satisfied that they are in alignment with and meets the City's requirements. Page 42 Staff recommends that Fire Board authorize the purchase of Office Supplies, Products and Related Services for fiscal year 2020/2021 from OMNIA Partners, for Office Depot utilizing the City of Tamarac, Contract Number #19-12R through OMNIA Partners for the respective supplies available on the contract. The contract term has an effective date of October 14, 2019 and an expiration date of October 13, 2023, with one (1) four (4) year renewal options. Staff also recommends authorizing expenditures in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets from various citywide accounts. FISCAL IMPACT: To date, FY 2019/2020 expenditures through Office Depot totaled $220,192. There would be no fiscal impact beyond that which has already been budgeted in the FY 2020/2021 adopted budget. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Authorizing the use of the proposed cooperative agreement supports Council's core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future and fostering continuous improvement. Continuing to utilize a cooperative contract to efficiently procure items such as office supplies, products and related services manages future costs by providing pre-determined discounts and provides adequate flexibility to respond effectively and efficiently to unforeseen needs. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 43 Olt, DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Sandy Griffin, EMS Administrator Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager Michelle Cowles, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Consideration of the purchase of Emergency Medical Supplies and Materials in the combined, not to exceed amount of$75,000 from Life Assist and Henry Schein. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve a joint award for the purchase of Emergency Medical Supplies and Materials for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District), on an as-needed basis, to Life Assist of Rancho Cordova, California, for an amount not to exceed $60,000, and Henry Schein for an amount not to exceed $15,000, in accordance with Request for Bid ("RFB") #20/21-103, for a total combined annual amount not to exceed $75,000. BACKGROUND: In response to a variety of illnesses and injuries, each staffed and equipped frontline District response unit provides Advanced Life Support (ALS) services. Firefighters, cross-trained as licensed Paramedics, are responsible for patient assessment, emergency care, and advanced treatment. These services can include the administration of controlled medications, advanced airway control and maintenance, cardiac treatment, and trauma management. All ALS response units must be equipped and continuously replenished with medical supplies and medications to maintain the minimum amount required by the County Local EMS Authority (LEMSA). ANALYSIS: The District provided specifications for medications and supplies to the Procurement Division for review and determination of the best method of procurement. The Procurement Division prepared and posted a formal RFB #20/21-103 to the City's automated procurement system. There was a total of 216 vendors notified, and 18 prospective bidders downloaded the solicitation documents. Four (4) bid responses were received. Life Assist and Henry Schein were the lowest, most responsive bidders. The cost of medications continues to be unstable and frequently fluctuates due to a lack of manufacturing plants in the United States. Additionally, the merging and acquisition of various pharmaceutical companies have the added potential to drive the cost of medications up even further as the demand for these medications increases, and the supplier availability decreases. Awarding the bid to Life Assist and Henry Schein, who have both confirmed their pricing through June 30, 2021, provides overall cost savings for the District. This award also assists with cost containment and has a positive fiscal impact as it supports purchasing medications and supplies from the vendors with the most competitive pricing. Utilizing two vendors provides additional resources to purchase supplies, which is needed due to the ongoing national shortages. All documentation for the bid is on file in the Procurement Division. Page 44 FISCAL IMPACT: FY20/21 funds for Emergency Medical Supplies and Materials were budgeted and approved in Emergency Medical Services/Operations & Maintenance/EMS Supplies & Materials, Account Number 3281504-5200, for an amount not to exceed $75,000. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The award of this bid to Life Assist and Henry Schein will fulfill the Fire Board's goal in promoting a safe and healthy community for all, and addresses the core value of responsibility, promoting efficient and economical use of public resources. ATTACHMENTS: N/A Page 2 Page 45 01 JW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Veronica Lopez SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Amount of$1,017,183.60 and Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of$6,218,315.13 Dated July 27, 2020 Through August 10, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of July 2020 in the Amount of$6,225,404.25. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment - 1. Attachment - 2 Page 46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00011019 07/27/2020 AHUMADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011020 07/27/2020 ALMAND,LLOYD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011021 07/27/2020 BANTAU,VICTORIA 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011022 07/27/2020 BAZAL,SUSAN 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00011023 07/27/2020 BELL,MICHAEL L 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011024 07/27/2020 BERRY,DAVID 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00011025 07/27/2020 BROCK,ROBIN 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011026 07/27/2020 CAMPBELL,GERALD 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00011027 07/27/2020 CAMPBELL,STEVEN 0.00 1,189.23 1,189.23 AP 00011028 07/27/2020 CARNES,KENNETH 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011029 07/27/2020 CLABBY,RICHARD 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00011030 07/27/2020 CLOUGHESY,DONALD R 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00011031 07/27/2020 CORCORAN,ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00011032 07/27/2020 COSTELLO,DENNIS M 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00011033 07/27/2020 COX,KARL 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011034 07/27/2020 CRANE,RALPH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011035 07/27/2020 CROSSLAND,WILBUR 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011036 07/27/2020 CURATALO,JAMES 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011037 07/27/2020 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00011038 07/27/2020 DE ANTONIO,SUSAN 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00011039 07/27/2020 DEANS,JACKIE 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00011040 07/27/2020 DOMINICK,SAMUEL A. 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011041 07/27/2020 EAGLESON,MICHAEL 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011042 07/27/2020 EGGERS,BOB 0.00 1,735.57 1,735.57 AP 00011043 07/27/2020 FEJERAN,TIM 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00011044 07/27/2020 FRITCHEY,JOHN D. 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011045 07/27/2020 HEYDE,DONALD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011046 07/27/2020 INTERLICCHIA,ROSALYN 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00011047 07/27/2020 JERKINS,PATRICK 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00011048 07/27/2020 KILMER,STEPHEN 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00011049 07/27/2020 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011050 07/27/2020 LARKIN,DAVID W 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00011051 07/27/2020 LEE,ALLAN J. 0.00 948.67 948.67 AP 00011052 07/27/2020 LENZE,PAUL E 0.00 1,487.34 1,487.34 AP 00011053 07/27/2020 LONCAR,PHILIP 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00011054 07/27/2020 LONGO,JOE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00011055 07/27/2020 LUTTRULL,DARRELL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011056 07/27/2020 MACKALL,BEVERLY 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00011057 07/27/2020 MAYFIELD,RON 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011058 07/27/2020 MCKEE,JOHN 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011059 07/27/2020 MCNEIL,KENNETH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011060 07/27/2020 MICHAEL,L.DENNIS 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011061 07/27/2020 MORGAN,BYRON 0.00 1,792.73 1,792.73 AP 00011062 07/27/2020 MYSKOW,DENNIS 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00011063 07/27/2020 NAUMAN,MICHAEL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011064 07/27/2020 NEE,RON 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00011065 07/27/2020 NELSON,MARY JANE 0.00 200.43 200.43 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page 4lme: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00011066 07/27/2020 O'BRIEN,TOM 0.00 1,281.58 1,281.58 AP 00011067 07/27/2020 PLOUNG,MICHAEL J 0.00 563.78 563.78 AP 00011068 07/27/2020 POST,MICHAEL R 0.00 1,280.32 1,280.32 AP 00011069 07/27/2020 PROULX,PATRICK 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011070 07/27/2020 REDMOND,MIKE 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011071 07/27/2020 ROBERTS,BRENT 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00011072 07/27/2020 ROBERTS,CHERYL L 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00011073 07/27/2020 ROEDER,JEFF 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011074 07/27/2020 SALISBURY,THOMAS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011075 07/27/2020 SMITH,RONALD 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011076 07/27/2020 SORENSEN,SCOTT D 0.00 1,625.06 1,625.06 AP 00011077 07/27/2020 SPAGNOLO,SAM 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011078 07/27/2020 SPAIN,WILLIAM 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00011079 07/27/2020 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00011080 07/27/2020 TAYLOR,STEVEN 0.00 1,975.24 1,975.24 AP 00011081 07/27/2020 TULEY,TERRY 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00011082 07/27/2020 VANDERKALLEN,FRANCIS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011083 07/27/2020 VARNEY,ANTHONY 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00011084 07/27/2020 WALTON,KEVIN 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00011085 07/27/2020 YOWELL,TIMOTHY A 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00011086 07/29/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,471.35 0.00 23,471.35 AP 00011087 07/29/2020 GEOGRAPHICS 795.00 0.00 795.00 AP 00011088 07/29/2020 RCCEA 1,840.00 0.00 1,840.00 AP 00011089 07/29/2020 RCPFA 12,558.07 0.00 12,558.07 AP 00011090 07/29/2020 RIVERSIDE,CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00011091 07/29/2020 FEHR&PEERS 3,310.00 0.00 3,310.00 AP 00011092 07/30/2020 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 7,461.48 0.00 7,461.48 AP 00011093 07/30/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 897.77 0.00 897.77 AP 00011094 07/30/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 10,494.00 0.00 10,494.00 AP 00011095 07/30/2020 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 11,876.46 0.00 11,876.46 AP 00011096 07/30/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 5.55 5.55 AP 00011097 07/30/2020 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 0.00 486.94 486.94 AP 00011098 07/30/2020 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 0.00 1,369.14 1,369.14 AP 00011099 07/30/2020 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 1,572.29 0.00 1,572.29 AP 00011100 07/30/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 588.89 0.00 588.89 AP 00011101 07/30/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 783.98 0.00 783.98 AP 00011102 08/05/2020 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 12,056.97 0.00 12,056.97 AP 00011103 08/05/2020 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 526.32 0.00 526.32 AP 00011104 08/05/2020 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 113,481.82 0.00 113,481.82 AP 00011105 08/05/2020 MOFFATT&NICHOL 173,192.38 0.00 173,192.38 AP 00011106 08/05/2020 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 171,954.47 515,863.42 687,817.89 *** AP 00011107 08/05/2020 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 18,679.22 0.00 18,679.22 AP 00011108 08/05/2020 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 34,095.00 0.00 34,095.00 AP 00011109 08/05/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,935,059.53 0.00 2,935,059.53 AP 00011110 08/06/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 1,412.65 0.00 1,412.65 AP 00011111 08/06/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 52,874.97 0.00 52,874.97 AP 00011112 08/06/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,316.60 -26.38 1,290.22 *** User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page'lme: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00011113 08/06/2020 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 984.84 0.00 984.84 AP 00011114 08/06/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 2,950.17 0.00 2,950.17 AP 00011115 08/06/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 0.00 77.58 77.58 AP 00011116 08/06/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 5,775.00 0.00 5,775.00 AP 00411274 07/27/2020 KIRKPATRICK,WILLIAM 0.00 1,666.26 1,666.26 AP 00411275 07/27/2020 RODRIGUEZ,VICTOR 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00411276 07/27/2020 TOWNSEND,JAMES 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00411277 07/27/2020 WALKER,KENNETH 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00411278 07/29/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00411279 07/29/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 224.60 0.00 224.60 AP 00411280 07/29/2020 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 397.59 0.00 397.59 AP 00411281 07/29/2020 AMERICAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC 1,071.73 0.00 1,071.73 AP 00411282 07/29/2020 BERRY CONSTRUCTION 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00411283 07/29/2020 BINDU VARGHESE 4,200.00 0.00 4,200.00 AP 00411284 07/29/2020 BISHOP COMPANY 173.39 0.00 173.39 AP 00411285 07/29/2020 CA LLC-ALTA LAGUNA MHP 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00411286 07/29/2020 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73 AP 00411287 07/29/2020 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00411288 07/29/2020 CENGAGE LEARNING INC/GALE 3,027.64 0.00 3,027.64 AP 00411289 07/29/2020 CHAMPION AWARDS&SPECIALTIES 58.19 0.00 58.19 AP 00411290 07/29/2020 CHANG,TOM C 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00411291 07/29/2020 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 474.35 0.00 474.35 AP 00411292 07/29/2020 CHINO MOWER&ENGINE SERVICE 258.49 0.00 258.49 AP 00411293 07/29/2020 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 7,004.47 7,004.47 AP 00411294 07/29/2020 FAIRVIEW FORD INC 1,563.78 0.00 1,563.78 AP 00411295 07/29/2020 FLEET SERVICES INC 0.00 60.19 60.19 AP 00411296 07/29/2020 FRONTIER COMM 1,850.85 790.72 2,641.57 *** AP 00411297 07/29/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,339.54 0.00 3,339.54 AP 00411298 07/29/2020 GOVQA LLC 17,980.00 0.00 17,980.00 AP 00411299 07/29/2020 GRAINGER 0.00 4,332.18 4,332.18 AP 00411300 07/29/2020 GROVES ON FOOTHILL,THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00411301 07/29/2020 HDL SOFTWARE LLC 15,532.55 0.00 15,532.55 AP 00411302 07/29/2020 HI-WAY SAFETY INC 199.62 0.00 199.62 AP 00411303 07/29/2020 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00411304 07/29/2020 INLAND COUNTIES EMERGENCY MEDICAL AGENCY 0.00 7,600.00 7,600.00 AP 00411305 07/29/2020 INLAND DESERT SECURITY&COMMUNICATIONS INC 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00411306 07/29/2020 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 239,026.30 0.00 239,026.30 AP 00411307 07/29/2020 KING,ERINN 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00411308 07/29/2020 KRONOS INC 0.00 14,400.00 14,400.00 AP 00411309 07/29/2020 LANDIS,STEVEN 2,931.00 0.00 2,931.00 AP 00411310 07/29/2020 LOPEZ,ERICKA 155.52 0.00 155.52 AP 00411311 07/29/2020 MCCAIN,SARAH 802.52 0.00 802.52 AP 00411312 07/29/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 107.58 1,232.82 1,340.40 *** AP 00411313 07/29/2020 PARSAC 388,505.00 0.00 388,505.00 AP 00411314 07/29/2020 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK,THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00411315 07/29/2020 PLANETBIDS INC 17,730.00 0.00 17,730.00 AP 00411316 07/29/2020 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page'ime: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411317 07/29/2020 QUADIENT INC 270.23 0.00 270.23 AP 00411318 07/29/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,637.76 0.00 2,637.76 AP 00411319 07/29/2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,333.34 0.00 3,333.34 AP 00411320 07/29/2020 REDROCK DEVELOPMENT INC 8,533.00 0.00 8,533.00 AP 00411321 07/29/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00411322 07/29/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00411323 07/29/2020 ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00411324 07/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 720.00 720.00 AP 00411325 07/29/2020 SBPEA 2,473.67 0.00 2,473.67 AP 00411327 07/29/2020 SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC 416.10 0.00 416.10 AP 00411335 07/29/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12,518.49 1,556.96 14,075.45 *** AP 00411336 07/29/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.00 1,951.45 1,951.45 AP 00411337 07/29/2020 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00411338 07/29/2020 TAYLOR,SAMANTHA 545.04 0.00 545.04 AP 00411339 07/29/2020 TIMBERWOLFF CONSTRUCTION 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00411340 07/29/2020 TRANSWEST TRUCK CENTER 0.00 1,096.34 1,096.34 AP 00411341 07/29/2020 UNITED WAY 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00411342 07/29/2020 UPS 92.46 0.00 92.46 AP 00411343 07/29/2020 VAN DAELE HOMES CORPORATION 350.07 0.00 350.07 AP 00411344 07/29/2020 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS LLC 30,186.00 0.00 30,186.00 AP 00411345 07/29/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 0.00 3,513.04 3,513.04 AP 00411346 07/29/2020 WE TIP INC 8,826.70 0.00 8,826.70 AP 00411347 07/29/2020 ALTUM GROUP,THE 1,711.50 0.00 1,711.50 AP 00411348 07/29/2020 ARAGON,HEATHER 176.04 0.00 176.04 AP 00411349 07/29/2020 ASSI SECURITY 6,900.00 0.00 6,900.00 AP 00411350 07/29/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,160.00 0.00 3,160.00 AP 00411351 07/29/2020 BAKER&TAYLOR LLC 7,527.42 0.00 7,527.42 AP 00411352 07/29/2020 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 105.59 105.59 AP 00411353 07/29/2020 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 85.80 0.00 85.80 AP 00411354 07/29/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 6,768.56 0.00 6,768.56 AP 00411355 07/29/2020 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 393.00 0.00 393.00 AP 00411363 07/29/2020 C V W D 216,643.47 919.36 217,562.83 *** AP 00411364 07/29/2020 CASTANEDA,MIGUEL 320.06 0.00 320.06 AP 00411365 07/29/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 37.51 37.51 AP 00411366 07/29/2020 COAST RECREATION INC 133.57 0.00 133.57 AP 00411367 07/29/2020 CONOR CONSULTING LLC 712.50 0.00 712.50 AP 00411368 07/29/2020 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 997.36 0.00 997.36 AP 00411369 07/29/2020 CRAYON SOFTWARE EXPERTS LLC 324,813.48 37,520.00 362,333.48 *** AP 00411370 07/29/2020 CURTIS J DAHLE ARCHITECT 677.81 0.00 677.81 AP 00411371 07/29/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0.00 98.00 98.00 AP 00411372 07/29/2020 DHEKANE,GAYATRI 137.60 0.00 137.60 AP 00411373 07/29/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 2,540.00 0.00 2,540.00 AP 00411374 07/29/2020 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY 0.00 75.00 75.00 AP 00411375 07/29/2020 FAKIH,ZEINA B 124.32 0.00 124.32 AP 00411376 07/29/2020 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION 0.00 759.64 759.64 AP 00411377 07/29/2020 GOUDA,SHEREEN 1,256.70 0.00 1,256.70 AP 00411378 07/29/2020 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,363.99 0.00 1,363.99 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page%ne: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411379 07/29/2020 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 4,969.87 4,969.87 AP 00411380 07/29/2020 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 6,452.50 0.00 6,452.50 AP 00411381 07/29/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 44,445.02 0.00 44,445.02 AP 00411382 07/29/2020 INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL COMPOSTING AUTHORITY 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00411383 07/29/2020 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 5,614.00 0.00 5,614.00 AP 00411384 07/29/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 1,044.00 27,276.60 28,320.60 *** AP 00411385 07/29/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 7,585.00 0.00 7,585.00 AP 00411386 07/29/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 1,662.46 0.00 1,662.46 AP 00411387 07/29/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 1,242.64 0.00 1,242.64 AP 00411388 07/29/2020 ONTRAC 52.88 0.00 52.88 AP 00411389 07/29/2020 PARKES,DR KEVIN 0.00 7,000.00 7,000.00 AP 00411390 07/29/2020 PFINIX CREATIVE GROUP 13,940.00 0.00 13,940.00 AP 00411391 07/29/2020 QUADIENT INC 270.23 0.00 270.23 AP 00411392 07/29/2020 RUTHERIG,ROBYN 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00411393 07/29/2020 RYLANDER,RICHARD 87.00 0.00 87.00 AP 00411394 07/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 13,266.27 13,266.27 AP 00411395 07/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 60.81 0.00 60.81 AP 00411396 07/29/2020 SC FUELS 19,912.21 0.00 19,912.21 AP 00411397 07/29/2020 SILVER&WRIGHT LLP 3,001.91 0.00 3,001.91 AP 00411398 07/29/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 2,656.30 366.20 3,022.50 *** AP 00411399 07/29/2020 STEFFEN,MELINDA 87.00 0.00 87.00 AP 00411400 07/29/2020 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 576.22 576.22 AP 00411401 07/29/2020 UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF INLAND EMPIRE 504.00 0.00 504.00 AP 00411402 07/29/2020 UPS 70.33 0.00 70.33 AP 00411403 07/29/2020 URBAN ARENA 7.87 0.00 7.87 AP 00411404 07/29/2020 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00411405 07/29/2020 WANG,CHENG 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00411406 07/29/2020 WEBER,KATHERINE 148.08 0.00 148.08 AP 00411407 07/29/2020 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 0.00 3,175.00 3,175.00 AP 00411408 07/29/2020 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 842.97 842.97 AP 00411409 07/29/2020 YOUNGER,SAKURA 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00411410 08/05/2020 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,099.40 0.00 1,099.40 AP 00411411 08/05/2020 AGRI-TURF DISTRIBUTING LLC 2,604.57 0.00 2,604.57 AP 00411412 08/05/2020 ARGIL DE MONTANO,ZAIRA 901.00 0.00 901.00 AP 00411413 08/05/2020 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 2,834.44 0.00 2,834.44 AP 00411414 08/05/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 20,450.00 0.00 20,450.00 AP 00411415 08/05/2020 BAKER&TAYLOR LLC 1,934.15 0.00 1,934.15 AP 00411416 08/05/2020 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS CORP 0.00 1,116.91 1,116.91 AP 00411417 08/05/2020 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS CORP 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00411418 08/05/2020 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00411419 08/05/2020 COLLINS COLLINS MUIR&STEWART LLP 13,223.85 0.00 13,223.85 AP 00411420 08/05/2020 DEKRA-LITE 11,059.74 0.00 11,059.74 AP 00411421 08/05/2020 ELITE CUSTOMS CONSTRUCTION 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00411422 08/05/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 58.05 0.00 58.05 AP 00411423 08/05/2020 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84 AP 00411424 08/05/2020 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 20,272.44 20,272.44 AP 00411425 08/05/2020 HR GREEN PACIFIC INC 45,009.75 0.00 45,009.75 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Hine: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411426 08/05/2020 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 331,965.55 0.00 331,965.55 AP 00411427 08/05/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 0.00 1,793.30 1,793.30 AP 00411428 08/05/2020 IPERMIT 236.48 0.00 236.48 AP 00411429 08/05/2020 LANDSCAPE WEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 66,464.81 0.00 66,464.81 AP 00411430 08/05/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 3,184.00 0.00 3,184.00 AP 00411431 08/05/2020 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 333.20 333.20 AP 00411432 08/05/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 19,885.58 0.00 19,885.58 AP 00411433 08/05/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 145.54 0.00 145.54 AP 00411434 08/05/2020 MDG ASSOCIATES INC 27,652.50 0.00 27,652.50 AP 00411435 08/05/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 979.26 0.00 979.26 AP 00411436 08/05/2020 NEW COLOR PRINTING 1,185.25 0.00 1,185.25 AP 00411437 08/05/2020 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 154,757.00 0.00 154,757.00 AP 00411438 08/05/2020 PACIFIC WESTERN BANK 9,050.24 27,150.70 36,200.94 *** AP 00411439 08/05/2020 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00411440 08/05/2020 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 2,760.00 2,760.00 AP 00411441 08/05/2020 PLACEWORKS 5,472.31 0.00 5,472.31 AP 00411442 08/05/2020 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 135.78 135.78 AP 00411443 08/05/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 16,419.24 0.00 16,419.24 AP 00411444 08/05/2020 SILVER&WRIGHT LLP 7,214.80 0.00 7,214.80 AP 00411445 08/05/2020 SIRSIDYNIX 3,988.28 0.00 3,988.28 AP 00411447 08/05/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,354.48 366.20 1,720.68 *** AP 00411448 08/05/2020 SOCIAL IMPACT ARTISTS-TSIA,THE 6,400.00 0.00 6,400.00 AP 00411449 08/05/2020 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 137.63 137.63 AP 00411450 08/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,301.21 0.00 2,301.21 AP 00411451 08/05/2020 SUPERION LLC 1,760.00 0.00 1,760.00 AP 00411452 08/05/2020 TOMCO LLC 3,690.00 0.00 3,690.00 AP 00411453 08/05/2020 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY 0.00 23.49 23.49 AP 00411454 08/05/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 242.58 0.00 242.58 AP 00411455 08/05/2020 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 46,120.00 0.00 46,120.00 AP 00411456 08/05/2020 ALL WELDING 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00411457 08/05/2020 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 3,863.62 0.00 3,863.62 AP 00411458 08/05/2020 AMADOR,GILBERT 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00411459 08/05/2020 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 32.27 0.00 32.27 AP 00411460 08/05/2020 BEESON,STACEE 59.43 0.00 59.43 AP 00411461 08/05/2020 BEST SOLAR POWER INC 179.11 0.00 179.11 AP 00411462 08/05/2020 BLACKBAUD 9,758.13 0.00 9,758.13 AP 00411463 08/05/2020 C P GENERATOR INC 129.30 0.00 129.30 AP 00411464 08/05/2020 C V W D 808.05 313.93 1,121.98 *** AP 00411468 08/05/2020 C V W D 55,383.27 785.37 56,168.64 *** AP 00411469 08/05/2020 CAI,RAN 52.25 0.00 52.25 AP 00411470 08/05/2020 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS CORP 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00411471 08/05/2020 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,529.39 6,411.82 10,941.21 *** AP 00411473 08/05/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,747.23 1,389.98 4,137.21 *** AP 00411474 08/05/2020 DAISYECO INC 574.14 0.00 574.14 AP 00411475 08/05/2020 DEKRA-LITE 213.15 0.00 213.15 AP 00411476 08/05/2020 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL 265.00 0.00 265.00 AP 00411477 08/05/2020 DUDE SOLUTIONS INC 16,890.00 0.00 16,890.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page dine: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411478 08/05/2020 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 213.35 0.00 213.35 AP 00411479 08/05/2020 ELITE CUSTOMS CONSTRUCTION 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00411480 08/05/2020 ERICKSON-HALL CONSTRUCTION CO 0.00 78,491.25 78,491.25 AP 00411481 08/05/2020 FAIRVIEW FORD INC 1,073.78 0.00 1,073.78 AP 00411482 08/05/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 60.30 0.00 60.30 AP 00411483 08/05/2020 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 1,800.00 0.00 1,800.00 AP 00411484 08/05/2020 GLENN,WILLIE 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00411485 08/05/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC 371.74 0.00 371.74 AP 00411486 08/05/2020 GUTIERREZ,GABRIELLA 80.84 0.00 80.84 AP 00411487 08/05/2020 HANSEN,BARBARA 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00411488 08/05/2020 HONDA YAMAHA HUSQVARNA OF REDLANDS 323.12 0.00 323.12 AP 00411489 08/05/2020 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 6,500.00 0.00 6,500.00 AP 00411490 08/05/2020 INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM 1,931.00 0.00 1,931.00 AP 00411491 08/05/2020 INTELESYS 140.00 0.00 140.00 AP 00411492 08/05/2020 IVANTI INC 30,820.00 0.00 30,820.00 AP 00411493 08/05/2020 K-K WOODWORKING 53.82 0.00 53.82 AP 00411494 08/05/2020 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 138.69 0.00 138.69 AP 00411495 08/05/2020 MANGO LANGUAGES 10,729.00 0.00 10,729.00 AP 00411496 08/05/2020 MARQUEZ,ED 58.67 0.00 58.67 AP 00411497 08/05/2020 MCCAININC 3,673.12 0.00 3,673.12 AP 00411498 08/05/2020 MCI 34.88 0.00 34.88 AP 00411499 08/05/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 416.72 0.00 416.72 AP 00411500 08/05/2020 MCMURRAY STERN INC 0.00 950.00 950.00 AP 00411501 08/05/2020 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 922.76 922.76 AP 00411502 08/05/2020 NAJERA,HECTOR 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00411503 08/05/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 103.44 174.54 277.98 *** AP 00411504 08/05/2020 NEARMAP US INC 20,820.00 3,180.00 24,000.00 *** AP 00411505 08/05/2020 NETFILE 12,600.00 0.00 12,600.00 AP 00411506 08/05/2020 OMEGA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LLC 0.00 14,465.00 14,465.00 AP 00411507 08/05/2020 ONTARIO,CITY OF 0.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 AP 00411508 08/05/2020 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00411509 08/05/2020 PARSAC 0.00 135,288.00 135,288.00 AP 00411510 08/05/2020 PASHA MANAGEMENT 44.90 0.00 44.90 AP 00411511 08/05/2020 PEP BOYS 61.20 0.00 61.20 AP 00411512 08/05/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 777.47 0.00 777.47 AP 00411513 08/05/2020 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 199.75 0.00 199.75 AP 00411514 08/05/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 135.04 0.00 135.04 AP 00411515 08/05/2020 RGB RICE GENERAL BUILDING 12,665.88 0.00 12,665.88 AP 00411516 08/05/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 5,460.00 0.00 5,460.00 AP 00411517 08/05/2020 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 711.98 711.98 AP 00411518 08/05/2020 SAN MARINO ROOF CO INC 0.00 15,956.00 15,956.00 AP 00411519 08/05/2020 SC FUELS 0.00 13,252.23 13,252.23 AP 00411520 08/05/2020 SHRED PROS 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00411523 08/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11,634.12 1,079.80 12,713.92 *** AP 00411524 08/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.41 0.00 37.41 AP 00411525 08/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14,508.68 0.00 14,508.68 AP 00411526 08/05/2020 SU,KAIHONG 3.96 0.00 3.96 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page%ne: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411527 08/05/2020 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00411528 08/05/2020 TIREHUB LLC 0.00 455.20 455.20 AP 00411529 08/05/2020 TORO TOWING 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00411530 08/05/2020 TUTOR.COM INC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00411531 08/05/2020 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 15,140.61 0.00 15,140.61 AP 00411532 08/05/2020 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 21,793.72 0.00 21,793.72 AP 00411533 08/05/2020 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,096.45 0.00 1,096.45 AP 00411534 08/05/2020 UPS 31.00 0.00 31.00 AP 00411535 08/05/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 0.00 4,973.12 4,973.12 AP 00411536 08/05/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 0.00 49.03 49.03 AP 00411537 08/05/2020 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00 Total City: $6,218,315.13 Total Fire: $1,090,405.43 Grand Total: , Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wine: 09:46:56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 7/1 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 5,584.05 5,584.05 7/1 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 2,782.50 2,782.50 7/1 U.S.BANK-Purchasing Card Payment 20,569.81 11,586.16 32,155.97 7/1 U.S.BANK-Corporate Card Payment 48,569.06 17,242.21 65,811.27 7/1 U.S.BANK-Costco Card Payment - 207.27 207.27 7/2 Bank Fee 78.45 78.45 7/2 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 2,476.80 2,476.80 7/2 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 11,188.80 11,188.80 7/2 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 12,811.20 12,811.20 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 259.20 259.20 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 288.00 288.00 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 460.80 460.80 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 782.40 782.40 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 1,228.80 1,228.80 7/2 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,700.80 3,700.80 7/2 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 268.38 268.38 7/2 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 12,147.00 12,147.00 7/3 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 95.33 95.33 7/6 WIRE PAYMENT-DEPOSIT FOR PROPERTY 55,500.00 55,500.00 7/6 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 357.02 357.02 7/6 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 2,303.18 2,303.18 7/7 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 580.00 580.00 7/8 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 3,772,801.00 3,772,801.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,795.00 2,795.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,121.00 3,121.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 4,600.00 4,600.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 15,250.00 15,250.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 192,481.00 192,481.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,525,072.00 2,525,072.00 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 588.04 588.04 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 690.63 690.63 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,141.68 3,141.68 7/8 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 29,874.22 29,874.22 7/8 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 2,502.76 2,502.76 7/9 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 1,270.44 1,270.44 7/10 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 53,262.61 53,262.61 7/10 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 112,452.33 112,452.33 7/10 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 80,750.00 80,750.00 7/13 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 14,254.00 14,254.00 7/14 WIRE PAYMENT-RCMU CAISO 56,674.77 56,674.77 7/14 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 12.00 12.00 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 1,767.90 1,767.90 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,689.32 2,689.32 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,704.82 2,704.82 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,239.32 3,239.32 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 5,171.06 5,171.06 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 10,060.01 10,060.01 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 12,971.71 12,971.71 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 23,756.92 23,756.92 7/15 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 113,997.06 113,997.06 7/15 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 722.20 722.20 7/15 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 580.00 580.00 7/16 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 5,224.32 5,224.32 7/16 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 2,782.50 2,782.50 7/16 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 1,094.61 1,094.61 7/16 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 1,828.99 1,828.99 a, Page 55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register July 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 7/17 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 1,336.34 1,336.34 7/17 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 3,070.43 3,070.43 7/20 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 1,061.97 1,061.97 7/20 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 1,265.07 1,265.07 7/21 WIRE PAYMENT-PURCHASE OF PROPERTY 1,795,924.26 1,795,924.26 7/21 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 580.00 580.00 7/22 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 176,129.60 176,129.60 7/22 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 2,242.24 2,242.24 7/22 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 730.40 730.40 7/23 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 6,007.28 6,007.28 7/23 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 6,538.24 6,538.24 7/24 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 127.83 127.83 7/24 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 681.51 681.51 7/27 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 368.25 368.25 7/28 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 189.90 189.90 7/29 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 239.32 239.32 7/30 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT-Child Support Payments 4,288.13 4,288.13 7/30 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 536.96 536.96 7/30 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 4,068.50 4,068.50 7/31 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 54,289.58 54,289.58 7/31 CALPERS-City-Retirement Account Deposit 112,342.89 112,342.89 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 2,651.91 2,651.91 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 3,261.31 3,261.31 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 5,171.06 5,171.06 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 10,451.50 10,451.50 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 24,228.89 24,228.89 7/31 CALPERS-Fire-Retirement Account Deposit 117,934.48 117,934.48 7/31 Workers Comp-City Account Transfer 70.95 70.95 7/31 Workers Comp-Fire Account Transfer 325.00 325.00 TOTAL CITY 6,225,404.25 TOTAL FIRE 3,381,960.99 GRAND TOTAL 9,607,365.24 2 Page 56 01 JW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Veronica Lopez SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Amount of$6,227.97 Dated July 27, 2020 Through August 10, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment - 1. Page 57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. Agenda Check Register 7/27/2020 through 8/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00411326 07/29/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,112.80 310.87 5,423.67 *** AP 00411446 08/05/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,115.17 0.00 1,115.17 Total City: $6,227.97 Total Fire: $310.87 Grand Total: . Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 08/11/2020 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page%ne: 09:52:02 01 JW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Department Manager SUBJECT: Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of July 31, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the attached current investment schedule for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of July 31, 2020. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedule as of July 31, 2020, reflects cash and investments managed by the Finance Department/Revenue Management Division and is in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's adopted Investment Policy as approved by the City Council on June 25, 2020. ANALYSIS: The City Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City Treasurer has elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment - 1 Page 59 Alk City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management RANCHO Portfolio Summary CUCAMONGA July 31, 2020 Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 380 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Certificates of Deposit-Bank 1,470,00000 1,466.371,55 1,470,000.00 0A8 1,415 1,087 1.356 1.375 Local Agency Investment Fund 73,266,281,82 73,266,281.82 73,266,281.82 24.14 1 1 0.907 0.920 CalTrust Short-Term Fund(JPA) 23,540,642.98 23,540,642.98 23,540,642.98 7.76 1 1 0.799 0.810 Certificates of Deposit(Neg)-Bank 245,000.00 255,409.32 245.000.00 008 1,097 912 1.879 1905. Commercial Paper-Discount 16,500,000.00 12,533,148.96 16,430,486.95 5A1 178 78 0.986 1.000 Federal Agency Issuer-Coupon 132,095,000.00 132,830,855.44 132,093,333.03 43.52 1'630 1,150 1.495 1,515 Treasury Securities-Coupon 16,000,000.00 16,197,912.50 15,989,370.10 5.27 1,201 217 2,193 2223 Passbook/CheckingAccounts 1,806,12727 1,806.12727 1.806,12727 0.60 1 1 0.197 0.200 Municipal Bonds 1,730,000,00 1,748.788,00 1.736.261.85 0,57 702 628 0.904 0.916 Corporate Notes 19,000,000.00 19,822,305.62 18,946,351.06 6.24 1,562 911 2.237 2.268 Supranational Securities 16,000,000,00 18,236,828.30 17,983,096.17 5.93 1,596 1,002 2.202 2.233 Investments 303,653,052.07 301,704,671.76 303,506,951.23 100.00% 986 642 1.385 1.404 Cash and Accrued Interest Accrued Interest at Purchase 5,872.09 5,872.09 Subtotal 5,872.09 5,872.09 Total Cash and Investments 303,653,052.07 301,710,543.85 303,512,823.32 986 642 1.385 1.404 Total Earnings July 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 385,501.00 385,501.00 Average Daily Balance 303,687,585.42 3039687,585.42 Effective Rate of Return 1.49% 1.49% 1 certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in conformity with the investment policy adopted June 25,2020. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from(IDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bo?_1_0cuments govern the management of these funds. Jim F%rrfingtori,Treasurer Reporting period 07/01/2020-0713112020 Portfolio CITY AP Run Date:08/1112020-07:58 PM(PRF_PM1)7.3.0 Report Ver.7.3.6.1     Page 60 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 1 Portfolio Details -Investments July 31, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM Daysto Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit-Bank 33646CJL9 1700 FIRST SOURCE BANK 02/28/2018 245,000.00 244,069.00 245,000.00 2.400 2.400 212 03/01/2021 88413QBZD 1699 THIRD FEDERAL SAV&LOAN 02/28/2018 245.000.00 244,973,05 245,o00.0o 2.500 2.500 300 05/2812021 6176OA6Q7 1744 MORGAN STANLEY PVT BANK 01/30/2020 245,000.00 242,329.50 245,000.00 1.850 1,850 912 01/3012023 29278TQD5 1785 ENERBANK USA 07/24/2020 245,000.00 245,000.00 245.000.00 0.450 0.450 1,453 07/2412024 169894AT9 1786 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK 07/29/2020 245.000.00 245,000.00 245,000.00 0,500 0.500 1,823 07/2912025 58404DHQ7 1787 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 07/30/2020 245,000.00 245,000,00 245,000.00 0.550 0.550 1,824 07/30/2025 Subtotal and Average 837,741.94 1,470,000.0D 1,466,371.55 1,470,000.00 1.375 1,087 Local Agency Investment Fund SYSDDoas 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 73,266,281.82 73.266,281.82 73,266.281_62 0 920 0.920 1 Subtotal and Average 71,645,869.47 73,266,281.82 73,266,281.82 73,266,281.82 0.920 1 CalTrust Short-Term Fund(JPA) SYS1768 1768 CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND 05/28/2020 23,540,642.98 23.640,642.98 23,540,642.98 0.810 0.810 1 Subtotal and Average 23,523,231.37 23,640,642.98 23,540,642.98 23,540,642.98 0.810 1 Certificates of Deposit(Neg)-Bank 949763S64 1747 WELLS FARGO 01/29/2020 245,000.00 255,409.32 245.000,00 1.900 1.905 912 01/30/2023 Subtotal and Average 245,000.00 245,000.00 255,409.32 245,000.00 1.905 912 Commercial Paper-Discount 4664OPHJ5 1758 JP MORGAN SECURITIES O4/0212020 3,000.000.00 2.999,790.00 2,986,775.00 1.150 P-1 1.171 17 08/1812020 59233GHU3 1759 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORK 04/03/2020 4,000,000.00 3,999,660.00 3,975,500.00 1.500 P-1 1.630 27 08/2812020 89233GJV9 1760 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP. 04/30/2020 4,000.000.00 39,003.96 3,978,888,89 1,250 P-1 1.274 59 09/2912020 62478XM23 1772 UNION BANC INVESTMENT SERVICES 05/27/2020 2,000,000.00 1,998,960.00 1,998,215.00 0.170 P-1 0.173 123 12/02t202O 4497WOP10 1773 ING FUNDING LLC 05/08/2020 3,500.000.00 3.495,835.00 3,491,108,06 0,340 P-1 0.345 184 02O112021 Subtotal and Average 19,361,450.18 16,500,000.00 12,533,148.96 16,430,436.96 0.986 78 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3130AAQU5 1671 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/30/2017 4,000,000.00 4,016,032.88 4,000.000.00 1.800 Aaa 1.800 90 10/3012020 3130A9VU2 1664 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/2512016 4,000.000.00 4.015,617.68 4,000.000.00 1.350 Aaa 1.350 115 11/2412020 3136G3QQ1 1648 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/25/2016 4,000.000,00 4,016,801.00 4,000,000.00 1.500 Aaa 1.500 116 11/2512020 3134GBSW3 1689 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 06/22/2017 3,50D,000.00 3.621,814.03 3,500,097.92 1.750 Aaa 1.743 143 12122/2020 3134G9PV3 1651 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 05/2712016 3,000,00o.0o 3,035,033,64 3,000,000.00 1.550 Aaa 1.550 299 05/2712021 3134GBJFO 1679 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 04127/2017 4,000,000.OD 4,065,257.16 4,000.000.00 1.800 Aaa 1.800 360 07/2712021 Portfolio CITY AP Run Dale:08111/2020-07:58 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0 ReportVer.7.3.&l     Page 61 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments July 31, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Maturity Date Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3136G3H65 1660 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/28/2016 4,000,000.00 4,049,291.32 4,000,000.00 1.400 Aaa 1.400 361 07128/2021 3133EJZU6 1710 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/20/2018 1,595,000.00 1,644,032.01 1,593,399,31 2.850 Aaa 2.943 415 09/20/2021 3133EG5133 1670 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01127/2017 1,500,000.00 1,541,335.14 1,500,000.00 2.030 Aaa 2.03D 544 01/27/2022 3133EHHH9 1683 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05102/2017 4,000,000.00 4,120,988.48 3,997,195.56 1920. Aaa 1.962 639 05/02/2022 3134GBVA7 1687 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG,CORP. 06129/2017 3,000,000.00 3,100,150.98 3,000,000.00 1.925 Aaa 1925. 697 05129/2022 3136G4VNO 1763 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/08/2020 4,1)00,000.00 4,002,525.72 4,000,000.00 0.500 Aaa 0.500 1,007 05/05/2023 3133EKG42 1725 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 08/29/2019 3,000,000.00 3,003,796.17 3,000,000.00 1.920 Aaa 1.920 1,122 08/28/2023 3130AEY38 1712 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 09128/2018 3,000,000.00 3,010,840.08 3,000,000.00 3.200 Aaa 3.200 1,153 09/28/2023 3136G4UE1 1750 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02 I312020 4,000,000.00 4,001,511.04 4,000,000.00 1.730 Aaa 1.730 1,199 11/13/2023 3134GVVE5 1765 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 05/2212020 3,500,000.00 3,500,893.31 3,500,000.00 0.550 Aaa 0.550 1,206 11/20/2023 3134GVD21 1778 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG,CORP. 06/04/2020 4,000,000.00 4,001,065.28 4,000,000.00 0.500 Aaa 0.500 1,220 12/04/2023 3133ELG24 1780 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2020 3,000,000.00 3,000,121.32 2,994,219.05 0.490 Aaa 0.548 1,224 12/0812023 3130AJ7G8 1757 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/26/2020 3,000,000.00 3,001,930.08 3.000,91021 1.730 Aaa 1.721 1,304 02/26/2024 3134GVXN3 1764 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 05121J2020 3,500,000.00 3,501,334.66 3,500,000.00 0,650 Aaa 0.650 1,388 05/20/2024 3130AJNS4 1779 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/08/2020 4,000,000.00 4,000,232.36 3,994,606.69 0.625 Aaa 0.661 1,403 06/0412024 3130AHMM2 1737 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/11/2019 3,000,000.00 3,015,550.74 3,000,000.00 1.850 Aaa 1.850 1,410 06M112024 3130AJ5A3 1753 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/19/2020 3,500,000.00 3,522,260.95 3,500,000.00 1.740 Aaa 1.740 1,479 08/19/2024 3134GVCS5 1755 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 02/26/2020 3,000,000.00 3,001,269.06 3,001,355.86 1.820 Aaa 1.808 1,479 08/19/2024 3130AHM69 1736 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 11/27/2019 3,000,000.00 3,002,965.44 3,000,000.00 1.875 Aaa 1.875 1,487 08/2712024 3133EKH41 1726 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/03/2019 3,000,000.00 3,002,113.02 3,000,000.00 2000. Aaa 2.000 1,494 09/03/2024 3130AH2BB 1728 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 09/11/2019 3,500,00o.00 3,505,139.96 3,494,100.56 1.970 Aaa 2013. 1,502 09/11/2024 3134GURZ5 1731 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 11/18/2019 3,000,000.00 3.013,896,51 3,000,000.00 2030. Aaa 2.030 1,570 1IJ1812024 3134GUOTO 1733 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 11/18/2019 4,000,000.00 4,002,771.00 4,000,000.00 2.Oo0 Aaa 2000. 1,570 11/1812024 3133ELBFD 1734 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/27/2019 4,500,000.00 4,522,364.06 4,500,000.00 1.890 Aaa 1.890 1,579 11/2712024 3134GUH78 1738 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 12/30/2019 5,500,000.00 5,534,638.67 5,500,000.00 2.000 Aaa 2.000 1,612 12/30/2024 3133ELLKS 1751 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 02/13/2020 3,000,000.OD 3,018,743.22 2,999,320.35 1,790 Aaa 1795 1,548 02104/2025 3135GOY23 1752 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/1812020 3,000,000.00 3,001,545.63 3,000,000.00 1.900 Aaa 1.900 1,662 02J1812025 3136G4UJ0 1756 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 0212612020 4,000,000.00 4,002,021.36 4,002,705.11 1.850 Aaa 1.834 1,670 02/26/2026 3134GVRBO 1762 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG.CORP. 05/08/2020 5,000.000,00 5,000,745.95 5,000,000.00 0.850 Aaa 0.850 1,738 05105/2025 3135GO4Z3 1762 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/2112020 4,000,000.00 4,019,683.0E 4,009,346.77 0,500 Aaa 0.452 1,781 06/17/2025 3133ELR71 1784 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/2112020 3,000,000.00 3,013,189.20 3,007,070.08 0.500 Aaa 0.451 1,796 07/02/2025 3136G4ZJ5 1753 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/21/2020 2,500,000.00 2,501,42325 2.499.005.56 0.625 Aaa 0.633 1,815 07/21/2025 Subtotal and Average 132,097,934.43 132,095,000.00 132,830,855A4 132,093,333.03 1.515 1,150 Portfolio CITY AP Run Date,08/1112020-07,58 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0     Page 62 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details -Investments July 31, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Maturity Date Treasury Securities-Coupon 912828M98 1665 US TREASURY NOTE 11/30/2016 5,000,000.00 5,024,450A0 5,000,000.00 1.625 Aaa 1.625 121 11/30/2020 912828A42 1705 US TREASURY NOTE 061W201 B 4,000,000.00 4,024,436.00 3,993,931.38 2.000 Aaa 2.475 121 11/30/2020 9128284T4 1706 US TREASURY NOTE 06/20/2018 3,500,000.0D 3,575,607.00 3,499,521.64 2.625 Aaa 2.641 318 06/15/2021 912828WY2 1697 US TREASURY NOTE 02/07/2018 3,500,000.00 3,573,419.50 3,495,917.18 2.250 Aaa 2.372 364 07/31/2021 Subtotal and Average 15,988,426.98 16,000,000.00 16,197,912.50 15,989,370.10 2.223 217 Passbook/Checking Accounts SYS00180 00180 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 1,606,127.27 1,806,127.27 1,806,127.27 0.200 P-1 0,200 1 Subtotal and Average 1,323,776.02 1,806,127.27 1,806,127.27 1,806,127.27 0.200 1 Municipal Bonds 799055QP6 1777 SAN MATEO FOSTER SCH DIST 05/19/2020 255,000.00 255,000.00 255,000.00 0.962 Aaa 0.707 0 08/01/2020 799055QQ4 1776 SAN MATEO FOSTER SCH DIST 05/1912020 475.000.00 477,698,00 475,997.50 1.062 Aaa 0.851 365 08/01/2021 799055QR2 1775 SAN MATEO FOSTER SCH DIST 05H912020 500.000.00 506,150.00 502,090.91 1.162 Aaa 0.950 730 08/01/2022 799055QSO 1774 SAN MATEO FOSTER SCH DIST 05/19/2020 500,000,00 509,940.00 503,173.44 1266 Aaa 1.0,90 1,095 08/01/2023 Subtotal and Average 1,736,408.06 1,730,000.00 1,743,788,00 1,736,261.85 0.916 628 Corporate Notes 59491BBW3 1677 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 02/14/2017 5,000.000.00 5,155,352,45 5,000,00D.00 2.400 Aaa 2.400 554 02/06/2022 931142DU4 1707 WALMART INC 0612112018 3,000,000.00 3,143,651.46 2,954,411.00 2.350 Aa 3.040 866 12/15/2022 037833AK6 1717 APPLE INC 05/06/2019 4,000.000.00 4,229,428,28 3,966,256.81 2.400 Aa 2725 1,005 05/03/2023 037833DV9 1771 APPLE INC 05/1112020 4,000,000.00 4,045.374,52 4,012,165.19 0.750 Aa 0.639 1,013 05/11/2023 037833CG3 1714 APPLE INC 02/11/2019 3,000,000.00 3,248,498.91 3,013,49B.06 3.000 Aa 2.862 1,287 02/09/2024 Subtotal and Average 18,945,445.03 19,000,000.00 19,822,305.62 18,946,351.06 2.268 911 Supranational Securities 459058DT7 1708 INTL BANK RECONSTRUCTION&DEV 06125/2018 4,500,000.00 4,580,716.82 4,479,618.67 2.250 Aaa 2,780 327 06/24/2021 459058FY4 1694 INTL BANK RECONSTRUCTION&DEV OW26/2017 4,500,000.00 4,617,353.43 4,503,477.50 2.000 Aaa 1.945 543 01126/2022 459058HP1 1735 INTL BANK RECONSTRUCTION&DEV 11/2712019 4,500,000.00 4,51 B,179,28 4,500,000.00 2.050 Aaa 2.050 1.565 11/13/2024 459058HQ9 1730 INTL BANK RECONSTRUCTION&DEV 11/18/2019 4,500,000.00 4,520,578.77 4,500,000.00 2.160 Aaa 2.160 1,570 11/18/2024 Subtotal and Average 17,982,301.94 18,000,000.00 18,236,828.30 17,983,099.17 2.233 1,002 Portfolio CITY AP Run Date,08111/2020-07,58 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0     Page 63 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page Portfolio Details-Investments July 31, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Maturity Total and Average 303,687,585.42 303,653,052.07 301,704,671.76 303,506,951.23 1.404 642 Portfolio CITY AP Run Date:0811 112020-07:58 PM(PRF_PM2)7 3.0     Page 64 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Pages Portfolio Details -Cash July 31, 2020 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's Maturity Average Balance 0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 5,872.09 5,872.09 0 Subtotal 5,872.09 5,872,09 Total Cash and Investments 303,687,585.42 303,653,052,07 301,710,643.86 303,512,823.32 1.404 642 Portfolio CITY AP Run Date:08111/2020-07:58 PM(PRF_PM2)7.3.0     Page 65 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 1 Activity By Type July 1, 2020 through July 31, 2020 Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions CUSIP Investment# Issuer Rate Date or Deposets or Withdrawals Halarice Certificates of Deposit-Bank 169894AT9 1786 CHIPPEWA VALLEY BANK 0.500 07/2912020 245,000.00 0.00 29278TQD5 1765 ENERBANK USA 0.450 0712412020 245,000,00 0.00 58404DHQ7 1787 MEDALLION BANK UTAH 0.550 07/30/2020 245,000,00 0.00 Subtotal 735,000.00 0.00 1,470,000.00 Local Agency Investment Fund (Monthly Summary) SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 0.920 13,266,627.34 15,000,000.00 Subtotal 13,266,627.34 15,000,000.00 73,266,281.82 CalTrust Short-Term Fund(JPA) SYS1768 1768 CALTRUST SHORT-TERM FUND 0.810 17,992.00 0.00 Subtotal 17,992.00 0.00 23,540,642.98 Certificates of Deposit(Meg)-Bank Subtotal 245,000.00 Commercial Paper-Discount 30229AGTO 1761 EXXON MOBIL CORP D.630 07/27/2020 0.00 3,494,610.00 Subtotal 0.00 3,494,610.00 16,430,486.96 Federal Agency Issues-Coupon 3133ELJF2 1742 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 1.830 07/22/2020 0.00 4,498,029.88 3133ELR71 1784 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0.500 07/21/2020 3,007,110.00 0.00 3135GOX32 1741 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 1.875 07/17/2020 0.00 6,000,000.00 3135GO4Z3 1782 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 0.500 07/21/2020 4,009,400.00 0.00 3136G4ZJ5 1783 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 0.625 07/21/2020 2,499,000.00 0.00 Subtotal 9,515,510.00 10,498,029.88 132,093,333.03 Treasury Securities-Coupon Subtotal 15,989,370.10 PassbooklChecking Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYS00180 00180 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 0.200 498,429.62 C.00 Subtotal 498,429.62 0.00 1,806,127.27 Portfolio CITY AP Run Date"08/11/2020-07,58 PM(PRF_PM3)7.3.0 Report Ver.7.3.6.1     Page 66 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Activity BY Type e Page z July 1, 2020 through July 31, 2020 Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions CUSIP Investment# Issuer Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Municipal Bonds Subtotal 1,736,261.85 Corporate Notes Subtotal 18,946,351.06 Supranational Securities Subtotal 17,983,096.17 Total 24,033,658.96 28,992,639.88 303,506,951.23 Portfolio CITY AP Run Date'.08/1112020-07.58 PM(PRF_PM3)7.3,0     Page 67 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Composition July 31, 2020 Supranational Securities 5.93% Corporate Notes Certificates of Deposit-Bank 6.24% 0.48% Municipal Bonds 0.57% Passbook/Checking Accounts Local Agency Investment 0.60% Fund 24.14% US Treasury Securities- Coupon 5.27% CalTrust Short-Term Fund (JPA) Federal Agency 7 76% Issues-Coupon 43.52% Certificates of Deposit(Neg) -Bank 0.08% Commercial Paper- Discount 5.41%     Page 68 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Maturity Distribution July 31, 2020 35.00% 32.36% 30.00% .. - 25.00% 22.10% 21.19% 20.00% -- -- - 15.00% — 12.46% 10.00% — — 6.62% 5.27% 5-00% -- - — - - ---- 0.00% - -_ Under 6 Months 6- 12 Months 1 -2 Years 2 -3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years Note_ Callable securities in portfolio are included in the maturity distribution analysis to their stated maturity date,although they may be called prior to maturity.     Page 69 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended July 31,2020 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond IssuelDescriotion Paving Agent Account Name Trust Account# Fund Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 Wells Fargo [mprovement Fund 16913302 101 Money Market Fund 814/1997 N/A 0.01% $ 301,236.58 Masi Plaza Reserve Fund 16913301 841 Money Market Fund 81411997 N/A 0.01% 242,500.00 Redemp.Fund 16913300 841 Money Market Fund 81411997 NIA 0.01% 593.88 $ 544,330.46 CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 1(2013) Wells Fargo Reserve Fund 46571801 865 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 NIA 0.01% $ 1,418,913.80 Agency Project 46571807 614 Money Market Fund 911/2013 NIA 0.01% 77,802.65 Cultural Center Fund 46571808 615 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 NIA 0,01% 191,621.68 Bond Fund 46571800 864 Money Market Fund 911/2013 NIA 0.01% 179.26 Developer Project 465718GB 614 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 NIA 0.01% 9B4O81.10 Special Tax 46571805 864 Money Market Fund 9/1/2013 NIA 0.01% 10,008.57 $ 1,796,807.06 CFD 2003-01 Improvement Area 2(2013) Wells Fargo Bond Fund 46659800 865 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 NIA 0.01% $ 29.41 Reserve Fund 46659801 867 Money Market Fund 121112013 NIA 0.01% 132,652.63 Special Tax Fund 46659805 866 Money Market Fund 12/1/2013 NIA 0,01% 935.76 $ 133,617.80 CFD No 2004-01 Rancho Etiwanda Series Wells Fargo Admin Expense Fund 48436802 Money Market Fund NIA 0.01% $ - Bond Fund 48436800 820 Money Market Fund NIA 0.01% 343.97 Reserve Fund 48436801 821 Money Market Fund NIA 0.01% 1,188,969.75 Special Tax Fund 48436807 820 Money Market Fund N/A 8.389.73 Project Fund 48436809 617 Money Market Fund NIA 44,975.68 $ 1,242,679.13 2014 Rancho Summit Wells Fargo Cost of Issuance Fund 48709906 Money Market Fund NIA $ - Bond Fund 48709900 858 Money Market Fund NIA 67.80 Reserve Fund 48709901 859 Money Market Fund N/A 261.106.71 Sepcial Tax Fund 48709907 858 Money Market Fund NIA 1,841.99 Rebate Fund 48709908 Money Market Fund N/A - Redemption Fund 48709903 Money Market Fund N/A Prepayment Fund 48709904 Money Market Fund NIA $ 263,016.50 2019 Lease Revenue Bonds Wells Fargo Bond Fund 82631600 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 NIA $ 217.88 Interest 82631601 711 Money Market Fund 2/28/2019 NIA 0.14 Principal 82631602 711 Money Market Fund 2/2812019 NIA - Acquisition and Construciton-Series A 82631605 711 Money Market Fund 2/2812019 NIA 8,636,042,39 Acquisition and Constmaton-Series B 82631606 711 Money Market Fund 212812019 NIA 2,293,968.18 Cost of Issuance 82631607 711 Money Market Fund 2/2812019 NIA - 1.,TINANCEKATHERINEIFiscal Agent StmtslFY 2020.21 I07-2020Uune 2020 Fiscal Agent Statements FY202i.xlsx Summary Report Page 1     Page 70 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended July 31,2020 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond IssuetDescription Paying Agent Account Name Trust Account# Fund Investment Date Date" Yield Value $ 10,930,228.59 Escrow Acct-Day Creek Villas Sr.Affordable Housing Chase Bank City of Rancho Cucamonga 389918209 396 Money Market Fund 412412019 NIA $ 3,523,276.09 $ 3.523.276.09 CFD No.2000-01 South Etiwanda Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-1 AGY 6712140200 780/2015 N/A $ Special Tax Fund 6712140201 Money Market Fund 7/3 012 01 5 N/A - Bond Fund 6712140202 852 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 2.55 Prepayment Fund 6712140203 Money Market Fund 713 012 01 5 N/A - Reserve Fund 6712140204 853 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 22,806,20 $ 22.808,75 CFD No.2000-02 Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2000-2 AGY 6712140300 Money Market Fund 713012015 NIA $ - Special Tax Fund 6712140301 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA $ - Bond Fund 6712140302 856 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA $ 24.76 Prepayment Fund 6712140303 Money Market Fund 7I3012015 NIA $ - Reserve Fund 6712140304 857 Money Market Fund 7/3012 0 1 5 NIA 0.00% 209,414.26 $ 209,439.02 CFD No.2001-01 IA 1&2,Series A Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY 6712140400 Money Market Fund 7/3012 01 5 NIA $ Special Tax Fund 6712140401 Money Market Fund 7/3012 01 5 NIA - Bond Fund 6712140402 860 Money Market Fund 7/3012015 N/A 60,27 Prepayment Fund 6712140403 Money Market Fund 7/3012015 NIA - Reserve Fund 6712140404 851 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA 0.00% 304,285.09 $ 304.345.36 CFD No.2001-01 IA3,Series B Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2001-1 AGY 6712140500 Money Market Fund 7/3 012 0 1 5 NIA $ - Special Tax Fund 6712140501 Money Market Fund 7/3 0120 1 5 NIA - Bond Fund 6712140502 862 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA 5.77 Prepayment Fund 6712140503 Money Market Fund 7/3 012 0 1 5 NIA - Reserve Fund 6712140504 863 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA 0.00% 29,542.91 $ 29,548.68 CFD No.2006-01 Vintner's Grove Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-1 AGY 6712140600 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA $ - Special Tax Fund 5712140601 Money Market Fund 7/3 012 0 1 5 NIA - Bond Fund 6712140602 869 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA 37.39 Prepayment Fund 6712140603 Money Market Fund 7/3 012 0 1 5 NIA - Reserve Fund 6712140604 870 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 0.00% 131,080.72 $ 131,11 B-11 1:IFINANCEWATHERWEIFiscal Agent StmtslFY 2020-21107-202011une 2020 Fiscal Agent Statements FY2021.x1sx Summary Report Page 2     Page 71 City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended July 31,2020 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue/Description Paving Agent Account Name Trust Account# Fund Investment Date Date Yield Value CFD No.2006-02 Amador on Rt.66 Union Bank Rancho Cucamonga 2015 CFD2006-2 AGY 6712140700 Money Market Fund 7/3 0120 1 5 N/A $ Special Tax Fund 6712140701 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA Bond Fund 6712140702 871 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 N/A 21.99 Prepayment Fund 6712140703 Money Market Fund 7/30/2015 NIA - Reserve Fund 6712140704 872 Money Market Fund 7/3 012 0 1 5 NIA 0.00% 79,660,72 $ 79,682.71 19,21 D,89B.26 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 19,210,898.26 Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. LIFINANCEIKATHERINEIFiscal Agent StmtslFY 2020-21107-2020Uune 2020 Fiscal Agent Statements FY2021.xlsx Summary Reoort Page 3     Page 72 Olt, i I DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020- 094) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Local Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan ("Plan") covering Fiscal Years 2020/2025 and adopt the attached Measure "I" Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy. BACKGROUND: Measure "I", the county-wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving revenues from the program annually adopt a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan which outlines the specific projects and anticipated costs for which Measure "I"funds will be used. In addition to adopting the Plan, the City is required by San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) Policy No. 40003 (amended May 6, 2015) to annually acknowledge the requirement to meet the minimum General Fund Maintenance of Effort (MOE) level approved by both the City Council and SBCTA Board in February and March 2016 respectively. The required MOE level for Fiscal Year 2020/21 is $2,225,757. The City anticipates spending approximately $2,571,220 in MOE eligible expenditures in Fiscal Year 2020/21 through personnel salaries, operation and maintenance contracts, and capital projects expenditures. ANALYSIS: Staff has prepared the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for consideration by the City Council. Upon adoption, the plan will be kept on file with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) for informational purposes. The Plan includes pavement rehabilitation of Fourth Street from Haven Avenue to Ontario Mills Parkway, design plans for future pavement rehabilitation of Etiwanda Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Wilson Avenue and asphalt overlay on various local roadways, along with contract services for concrete, striping and signal maintenance in Fiscal Year 2020/21. In addition to the required resolution, the City is required to adopt the attached Measure "I" Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy. This strategy is a narrative policy statement estimating the types of projects Local Measure "I" Funds are to be used for and the percentage of funds allocated for each type of project. The Plan has been `over-programmed" to ensure that the adopted plan contains ample projects for Measure "I" expenditures. In addition, no more than 50% of the estimated annual program revenue is programmed for categorical expenditures or general program categories as required by SBCTA policy. A general program category is a program of work without any identified streets/locations such as traffic signal maintenance. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item will meet SBCTA Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, MOE, and Expenditure Strategy requirements allowing the City to continue receiving Measure "I" funding. Page 73 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution No. 2020-094 Page 2 Page 74 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2020/2025 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "I" in November 2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 04-1 of the Authority; and WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue from the Local Streets Program to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan. WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code 190300 and Ordinance No. 04-1 require each local jurisdiction to maintain General Fund expenditures for transportation-related construction and maintenance activities at the required Maintenance of Effort base year level in each fiscal year of the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, which for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $2,225,757. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California that the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, attached to this resolution as Attachment A is hereby adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August 2020. Resolution No. 2020-XXX— Page 1 of 1 Page 75 ATTACHMENT A Resolution Number:2020-XXX Resolution Approval Date:8/19/20 Measure I Local Pass-through Program Gianfranco Laurie,Senior Civil FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Rancho Cucamonga Contact Personne:Engineer Phone:(909)774-4037 Fiscal Years 2020/2021 thru 2024/2025 6/30/20 Carryover Balance: Email:Gianfmnco.Laurie@cityofrc.us $4,634,731.08 Is Project in FY2020/21 Est.Revenue FY2021/22 Est.Revenue FY2022/23 Est.Revenue FY2023/24 Est.Revenue FY2024/25 Est,Revenue Total Est.Rev. Citys Does Project Is the Project on the Non-motorized have an ATP City's Nexus Study Estimated Total $2,617,906.00 $3,118,788.00 $2,999,650.00 $3,089,312.00 $3,184,710.00 $15,010,366.00 Trnn.p rvnion Component? List? Project Cost Plan? (Yes/No) (PublidDIF Share%) Carryover Current Carryover Current Carryover Current Carryover Current Carryover Current (Yes/No) Funds Estimate Funds Estimate Funds Estimate Funds Estimate Funds Estimate Total 4th St from Haven Ave to Milliken Ave-Pavement yes No 0% 100% $300,000.00 0.00 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $300,000.00 Rehabilitation 4th St from Milliken Ave to Ontario Mills Dr-Pavement Yes No 0% 100% $200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $200,000.00 Rehabilitation 6th St from Hellman Ave to Archibald Ave-Pavement yes Rehabilitation No 0% 100% $500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 $500,000.00 Banyan St from Milliken Ave to Rochester Ave- Yes No 0% 100% $520,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 520,000.00 $520,000.00 Pavement Rehabilitation Banyan St from Rochester Ave to Etiwanda Ave- Yes No 0% 100% $750,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Pavement Rehabilitation Camelian St from Base Line Rd to Rte 210-Pavement yes No 0% 100% $900,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Rehabilitation Etiwanda Ave from Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd- yes No 0% 100% $760,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $40,000.00 Pavement Rehabilitation Etiwanda Ave from Highland Ave to Base Line Rd- Yes No 0% 100% $960,000.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00 900,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $940,000.00 Pavement Rehabilitation Etiwanda Ave from Rte 210 to Wilson Ave-Pavement Yes No 0% 100% $880,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $870,000.00 Rehabilitation Etiwanda Ave from Whittram Ave to Arrow Rte- Yes No 0% 100% $1,108,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Widening and Rehabilitation Foothill Blvd from 1-15 Freeway to East Ave-Pavement Yes No 0% 100% $825,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 825,000.00 0.00 0.00 $825,000.00 Rehabilitation Haven Ave from Base Line Rd to Rte 210-Pavement yes No 0% 100% $850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 850,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $850,000.00 Rehabilitation Havabilitation en Ave from Rte 210 to Wilson Ave-Pavement Reh Yes No 0% 100% $900,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 900,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $900,000.00 Highland Ave from Beryl St to Archibald Ave-Pavement yes No 0% 100% $500,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 0.00 $500,000.00 Rehabilitation Lemon Ave from London Ave to Haven Ave-Pavement Rehabilitation Yes No 0% 100% $675,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Local Overlay t Various Locations(Attached Street List)-Pavemennt Rehabilitation yes No 0% 100% $1,040,000.00 0.00 490,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $490,000.00 Milliken Ave from Rte 210 to Banyan St-Pavement Yes No 0% 100% $547,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Rehabilitation Rochester Ave from 6th St to Arrow Rte-Pavement yes No 0% 100% $650,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 650,000.00 $650,000.00 Rehabilitation Rochester Ave from Banyan St to Highland Ave- Yes No 0% 100% $520,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 520,000.00 $520,000.00 Pavement Rehabilitation Rochester Ave from Base Line Rd to Banyan St- No No 0% 100% $979,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 $150,000.00 Pavement Rehabilitation Named Projects Total: $0.00 $1,090,000.00 $0.001 $1,750,000.00 $0.00 $1,750,000.00 $0.001 $1,975,000.00 $0.00 $1,690,000.00 $8,255,000.00 Total Carryover+Estimate: $1,090,000.00 $1,750,000.00 $1,750,000.00 $1,975,000.00 $1,690,000.00 (%)Named Projects to FY Est.Revenue:1 41.64% 56.11% 58.34% 63.93% 53.07% Categorical Projects: ADA Corrective Measures-City Wide No No $500,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 $500,000.00 Concrete Contract Services-Maintenance City Wide No No $500,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 $500,000.00 Pavement Management-Evaluate Pavement Condition No No $425,000.00 75,000.00 25,000.00 125,000.00 25,000.00 125,000.00 $375,000.00 City Wide Rancho Cucamonga Page 1 of 2 Generated on:8/3/2020     Page 76 Signal Contmct Services-Maintenance City Wide No No $3,930,000.00 850,000.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 770,000.00 $3,930,000.00 Striping Contract Services-Maintenance City Wide No No �EstReveTnue. 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 $750,000.00 Categor $1,245,000.00E6,055,000.00 Categorical Projects to 48.70% 36.71% 41.50% 37.06% 39.09% Total Carryover Programming: E0.00 Total Estimated Programming:1 $14,310,000.00 Total Programming: $14,310,000.00 Total Programming is currently 72.84%(must not exceed 150%)of Canyover Balance+Total Est.Revenue. Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 of 2 Generated on:8/3/2020     Page 77 ATTACHMENT A FY2020/21 MEASURE I LOCAL OVERLAY NO. STREET NAME FROM TO 1 THOROUGHBRED ST SAPPHIRE ST CAMEO ST 2 CAMEO ST TURK ST THOROUGHBRED ST 3 TURK ST END CAMEO ST 4 WILSON CT END CAMEO ST 5 JENNET ST SAPPHIRE ST TURK ST 6 GANNON ST AMARILLO ST WALKER CT 7 WALKER CT GANNON ST END 8 NOVA CT AMARILLO ST END 9 DREW CT AMARILLO ST END 10 CORTLAND ST AMARILLO ST END 11 SHELTON CT END DRAKE ST 12 HUDSON CT END DRAKE ST 13 DRAKE ST DELAWARE ST SHELTON CT 14 CABRINI CT END DELAWARE ST 15 FISK CT END DELAWARE ST 16 FURMAN CT END CHAPMAN PL 17 TRENTON CT PIEDMONT ST END 18 HEMLOCK ST VINEYARD AV HICKORY CT 19 HEMLOCK ST HICKORY CR GARNET ST Page 78 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEASURE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXPENDITURE STRATEGY Fiscal Year 2020/2021 —Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Each jurisdiction shall adopt a Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy as part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan adoption. The Expenditure Strategy is not intended to be a narrative description of the projects listed in the Capital Improvement Plan. Instead, the Expenditure Strategy should provide the policy approach adopted by the Council for the expenditure of Measure I funds. The jurisdictional Expenditure Strategy provides an opportunity to document circumstances or analyses which are not otherwise apparent when reviewing the Measure I Capital Improvement Plan. You must include the strategy as part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan adopted by your governing body. The Measure "I" Capital Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy for the expenditure of Measure I funds will use the City's General Plan Circulation Element as a basis. It is anticipated that the funds will be allocated in the following manner: Percent Type of Improvement 58 Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Repair of Existing Roadways 33 Traffic Signal Improvements, Pavement Striping and Maintenance 7 Concrete Services (ADA, Repair and Sidewalks) 2 Pavement Management 2020/2025 MICIP-Expenditure Strategy Page 79 Olt, i I DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the use of OMNIA Partners Cooperative Agreement with Grainger for the Procurement of Maintenance, Repair and Operations (MRO) Supplies, Parts, Equipment, Materials, and Related Services and Authorize the use of Future Renewals as Awarded by City of Tucson, to be Funded by Various Account Numbers, in Accordance with the Adopted Budget. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the use of a cooperative Contract through OMNIA Partners awarded by City of Tucson Contract Number #192163, to Grainger to procure maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services for Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and authorize staff to utilize future renewals as awarded by City of Tucson and OMNIA Partners, to be funded by various citywide account numbers in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets. BACKGROUND: As part of routine operations, the City procures and utilizes supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services, on a daily basis. In order to ensure availability and control costs, the Procurement Division oversees the procurement of these supplies under managed contracts with agreed to pricing and conditions for fulfillment. Staff was advised that the current cooperative agreement utilized for maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services is expiring and not going to be renewed. The Procurement Division has identified a viable cooperative procurement option with OMNIA Partners for maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services. A new agreement has been awarded to Grainger by the City of Tucson, through a solicitation that was competitively bid and awarded. ANALYSIS: Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal Code (RCMC), Section 3.08.070, the City may award contracts when the purchase is beneficial to the interest of the City and is from a supplier who has been awarded a specific item or items in a contract resulting from a formal competitive bid process by another governmental agency within the State of California or by the federal government within the last year. OMNIA Partners provides access to cooperative contracts such as the competitively bid and awarded contract of City of Tucson with Grainger which allows other agencies to participate in the contract and receive discounted volume pricing. Staff has reviewed the contract Terms and Conditions and is satisfied that they are in alignment with and meet the City's requirements. Page 80 Staff recommends that City Council authorize the purchase of maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) supplies, parts, equipment, materials, and related services for fiscal year 2020/2021 from OMNIA Partners, for Grainger utilizing the City of Tucson, Contract Number #192163 through OMNIA Partners for the respective supplies available on the contract. The contract term has an effective date of July 1, 2019 through December 31, 2022, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one-year periods through December 31, 2024. Staff also recommends authorizing expenditures in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets from various citywide accounts. FISCAL IMPACT: To date, FY 2019/2020 expenditures through Grainger totaled $67,307. There would be no fiscal impact beyond that which has already been budgeted in the FY 2020/2021 adopted budget. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Authorizing the use of the proposed cooperative agreement supports Council's core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future and fostering continuous improvement. Continuing to utilize a cooperative contract to efficiently procure goods and services required for maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) manages future costs by providing pre-determined discounts and provides adequate flexibility to respond effectively and efficiently to unforeseen needs. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 81 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Cheryl Combs, Procurement Technician SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the use of a Cooperative Contract Through OMNIA Partners Awarded by the City of Tamarac Contract#19-12R to Office Depot for the Procurement of Office Supplies, Products and Related Services for Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and Authorize the use of Future Renewals as awarded by the City of Tamarac Through OMNIA Partners. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the use of a cooperative contract through OMNIA Partners awarded by City of Tamarac Contract Number#19-12R, to Office Depot to procure office supplies, products and related services for Fiscal Year 2020/2021, and authorize staff to utilize future renewals as awarded by City of Tamarac and OMNIA Partners, to be funded by various citywide account numbers in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets. BACKGROUND: As part of routine operations, the City procures and utilizes office supplies daily. In order to ensure availability of supplies and control costs, the Procurement Division oversees the procurement of these office supplies under managed cooperative contracts with agreed to pricing and conditions for fulfillment. Staff was advised that the current cooperative agreement utilized for office supplies, products and related services is expiring and not going to be renewed. The Procurement Division has identified a viable cooperative procurement option with OMNIA Partners for office supplies, products and related services. A new agreement has been awarded to Office Depot by the City of Tamarac, through a solicitation that was competitively bid and awarded. The City currently has an electronic system in place that allows users to order a variety of office supplies including paper and printer toner cartridges through Office Depot. ANALYSIS: Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal Code (RCMC), Section 3.08.070, the City may award contracts when the purchase is beneficial to the interest of the City and is from a supplier who has been awarded a specific item or items in a contract resulting from a formal competitive bid process by another governmental agency within the State of California or by the federal government within the last year. OMNIA Partners provides access to cooperative contracts such as the competitively bid and awarded contract of City of Tamarac with Office Depot which allows other agencies to participate in the contract and receive discounted volume pricing. Staff has reviewed the contract Terms and Conditions and is satisfied that they are in alignment with and meets the City's requirements. Page 82 Staff recommends that City Council authorize the purchase of Office Supplies, Products and Related Services for fiscal year 2020/2021 from OMNIA Partners, for Office Depot utilizing the City of Tamarac, Contract Number #19-12R through OMNIA Partners for the respective supplies available on the contract. The contract term has an effective date of October 14, 2019 and an expiration date of October 13, 2023, with one (1) four (4) year renewal options. Staff also recommends authorizing expenditures in accordance with the adopted fiscal year budgets from various citywide accounts. FISCAL IMPACT: To date, FY 2019/2020 expenditures through Office Depot totaled $220,192. There would be no fiscal impact beyond that which has already been budgeted in the FY 2020/2021 adopted budget. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Authorizing the use of the proposed cooperative agreement supports Council's core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future and fostering continuous improvement. Continuing to utilize a cooperative contract to efficiently procure items such as office supplies, products and related services manages future costs by providing pre-determined discounts and provides adequate flexibility to respond effectively and efficiently to unforeseen needs. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 83 Olt, i I DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 03 to Professional Services Agreement with Magellan Advisors, LLC (CO18-103)for Fiber Optic Project Management and Design Services for Fiscal Year 2020/21 and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of$8,000 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and authorize Amendment No. 03 for the renewal of Professional Services Agreement (CO#18-103) with Magellan Advisors, LLC. in the amount of$108,000 for Fiscal Year 2020/21; and 2. Appropriate funds in the amount of$8,000 to Account 1711303-5300 (Contract Services)from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711). BACKGROUND: In 2018, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Magellan Advisors, LLC entered into a Professional Services Agreement (CO#18-103) to provide the necessary design, engineering, permitting and project management for the distribution of the fiber optic network as part of the City's Fiber Optic Master Plan, including the operational parameters to connect the new fiber backbone to the existing infrastructure. ANALYSIS: As the Rancho fiber optic network continues to expand, design services and project management is necessary to design for new development, determining new fiber connections and line extension opportunities, and continuing to provide support for the construction phase of the Fiber Optic Master Plan. Given Magellan Advisor's detailed knowledge of the project and master plan, along with their qualifications and expertise in the field, it is recommended that the City continue utilizing their services to monitor and provide oversight of design, development and implementation to ensure the project scope is maintained and achieved. A copy of the Amendment is available in the City Clerk's office. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711) in the amount of$100,000 is included in Account 1711303-5300 of the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Budget. An appropriation in the amount of$8,000 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund (Fund 711) to Account 1711303-5300 (Contract Services) is required to fully fund the amendment. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The implementation of the Fiber Optics Master Plan will enhance the City's position to embrace and anticipate the future of the community through an enhanced 21 st century infrastructure that is critical for economic development for existing and new businesses as well as residential customers. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 84 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Fred Lyn, Deputy Director of Engineering Services/Utilities and Env. Services Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve a Solar Incentive Rebate in the Amount of$300,000 For Day Creek Senior Housing Partners, LP and Day Creek Senior Housing Partners 2, L.P., and Authorization of an Appropriation for the Transfer of Funds from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to Cap and Trade Fund (Fund 709). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve a solar incentive rebate in the amount of $300,000 for Day Creek Senior Housing Partners, LP and Day Creek Senior Housing Partners 2, L.P. ("Applicant"), and authorize an appropriation for the transfer of funds from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to the Cap and Trade Fund (Fund 709) to complete the Solar Incentive Rebate. BACKGROUND: The RCMU Solar Incentive Rebate program was adopted by City Council Resolution 07-276 on December 5, 2007, following State guidelines set by the California Solar Initiative (Senate Bill 1 - 2006). Since then, RCMU has provided $975,000 in solar incentive rebates with 1.26 MW of Solar Photovoltaic (PV) generation in its service area. RCMU's solar incentive rebate program was closed on June 30, 2018 due to RCMU meeting all of its SB 1 requirements. The Applicant's project, Day Creek Senior Villas located at 12250 Firehouse Court is installing approximately 327 kW DC of Solar PV for their project. Their goal was to get the project at or near net zero energy for the 140 units and the common areas. The Applicant had applied for and received prequalification for several solar incentive programs being offered by the State for new solar homes and multi-family affordable housing for customers within California's Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) service area. However, because the project was located in RCMU's service area and not in the IOU's service area, the project was not eligible to receive the State's incentives. Due to this unique circumstance, RCMU staff worked with the Applicant to determine a solar rebate incentive amount that was comparable to those offered by the IOUs, while also allowing for each of the 140 residential units (which are separately metered) to receive the solar benefits through virtual net metering to be split amongst the units as a credit on their monthly bill. ANALYSIS: The agreed upon solar rebate incentive was for $0.92 per watt, with a maximum rebate amount not to exceed $300,000. The rebate amount will be calculated by: Rebate Amount ($) = CEC-AC System Rating x Design Factor x Incentive Rate ($0.92) For FY 2021, $150,000 has been budgeted in RCMU's Public Benefits Fund (Fund 706) to cover half of the solar rebate incentive. The other half of the funding will come from RCMU's cap and trade revenue. Cap and trade revenue received from the State's Cap-and-Trade Auction Program regulated by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) has historically been deposited into the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund Page 85 705) but will need to be transferred to a new Cap and Trade Fund (Fund 709). This revenue source specifically allows RCMU to utilize this funding for integrating renewable energy and ratepayer rebates, while reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This project covers all three criteria. The funding support of this solar project is expected to reduce GHG emissions by approximately 600 tons per year. Additionally, the 140 units, which will be occupied by low-income seniors will get the benefits of each unit being virtually net-metered from the solar system's generation, therefore, lowering the cost of their electricity bills. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation in the amount of$150,000 from the RCMU Cap and Trade Fund (Fund 709) to Account No. 1709303-5209 (O&M/Electric Utility) is needed to fully fund the other half of the rebate. A transfer of the accumulated balance of the ARB cap and trade revenue which had been deposited into the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to the Cap and Trade Fund (Fund 709) as follows is also required. Municipal Utility Fund —Transfer Out— 1705303-9709 for $2,523,940 Cap and Trade Fund —Transfer In — 1709000-8705 for$2,523,940 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Approval of this solar incentive rebate will allow Rancho Cucamonga to continue to build on our success as a world class community and to create a sustainable city through supporting renewable energy initiatives. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 86 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Mario Estrada, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Resolutions Ordering the Annexation into Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, and into Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 Located on the North Side of Fourth Street, Approximately 300 Feet West of Center Avenue, Related to Case No. DRC2018-00326. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-090), (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-091), AND (RESOLUTION NO. 2020-092). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve an Improvement Agreement for public improvements related to Case No. DRC2018-00326 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement; 2. Accept securities in the form of bonds to guarantee completion of the related public improvements; and 3. Adopt the attached resolutions ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 6. BACKGROUND: On April 10, 2019, the Planning Commission approved Case No. DRC2018-00326 for the construction of a new 58,130 square foot industrial building on 2.76 acres of land, located on the north side of Fourth Street, approximately 300 feet west of Center Avenue. Case No. DRC2018-00326 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed including sidewalk, curb and gutter, street trees, street lights, and street improvements. ANALYSIS: The developer, T-Rose Investments, LLC has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond No. 4438262: $52,400 Labor and Materials Bond No. 4438262: $52,400 Approval of this item by the Council would approve the improvement agreement, accept the securities for the construction of certain public improvements, and order the annexation into Landscape Maintenance District 3B and Street Lighting Districts 1 and 6. Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the developer are also on file in the City Clerk's office. Page 87 FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annexations would satisfy the conditions of approval for the development and supply additional annual revenue into the landscape and lighting maintenance districts in the following amounts: Landscape Maintenance District No. 313: $ 778.99 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1: $ 98.10 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6: $141.87 Furthermore, the development would construct one Street Light that will be maintained by the City. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This project meets our council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high-quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution LMD 3B Attachment 3 - Resolution SLD 1 Attachment 4 - Resolution SLD 6 Page 2 Page 88 ATTACHMENT 1 D RC2018-00326 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE H n II H H 11 Y q ,SDI I . 11i5�d0i,I!M• �.... ' Ir I ----------- - u IYP � f ai.s lyy, 4Y.1J 111fF 1l41r YYL : jy am Project Site N Page 89 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) FOR CASE NO. DRC2018-00326 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. XXX-XXX— Page 1 of 5 Page 90 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2020. Resolution No. XXX-XXX— Page 2 of 5 Page 91 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: T-Rose Investments, LLC 3880 East Ebony Street Ontario, CA 91761 The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5239, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per map filed in book 52, page 10 of parcel maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0210-371-01 Resolution No. XXX-XXX— Page 3 of 5 Page 92 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2020/21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) (the "Maintenance District") represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees and entry monuments. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2018-00326: Sidewalk, Parkway, and Driveway Approach. Resolution No. XXX-XXX— Page 4 of 5 Page 93 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2020/21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $282.24 for the fiscal year 2020/21. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) for Case No. DRC2018-00326: EBU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EBU* Non-Residential Acre 1.00 $282.24 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 2.76 Acres x 1 EBU Factor x $282.24 Rate per EBU = $ 778.99 Annual Assessment Resolution No. XXX-XXX— Page 5 of 5 Page 94 ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. DRC2018-00326 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 1 of 5 Page 95 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2020. Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 2 of 5 Page 96 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: T-Rose Investments, LLC 3880 East Ebony Street Ontario, CA 91761 The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5239, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per map filed in book 52, page 10 of parcel maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0210-371-01 Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 3 of 5 Page 97 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2020/21 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2018-00326: One (1) LED Street Light. Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 4 of 5 Page 98 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2020/21 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2020/21. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for Case No. DRC2018-00326: EBU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi-Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non-Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 2.76 Acres x 2 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $ 98.10 Annual Assessment Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 5 of 5 Page 99 ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) FOR CASE NO. DRC2018-00326 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial)(the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 1 of 5 Page 100 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2020. Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 2 of 5 Page 101 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: T-Rose Investments, LLC 3880 East Ebony Street Ontario, CA 91761 The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5239, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per map filed in book 52, page 10 of parcel maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0210-371-01 Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 3 of 5 Page 102 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2020/21 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. DRC2018-00326: None. Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 4 of 5 Page 103 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2020/21 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $51.40 for the fiscal year 2020/21. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial) for Case No. DRC2018-00326: EBU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EBU* Commercial/ Industrial Acre 1.00 $51.40 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 2.76 Acres x 1 EBU Factor x $51.40 Rate per EBU = $ 141.87 Annual Assessment Resolution No. XX-XXX— Page 5 of 5 Page104 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Contract with TSR Construction and Inspection in an Amount of $81,355 Plus a 10% Contingency, and Authorization of an Appropriation Totaling in an Amount of $76,400 for the Crossing Surface Improvement at Arrow Route Railroad Crossing Project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Crossing Surface Improvement at Arrow Route Railroad (Project); 2. Accept the bids received for the Project; 3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $81,355; to the lowest responsive bidder TSR Construction and Inspection for the total bid; 4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of$8,136; 5. Authorize an appropriation in the amount of$38,200 from the Gas Tax R&T7360 Fund (Fund 174) fund balance; and 6. Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $38,200 from the Measure I Fund (Fund 177)fund balance. BACKGROUND: On April 15, 2020, the City Council approved a Crossing Surface Installation Agreement between Burlington Northern Santa Fe and the City(CO20-037), for the installation of new concrete panels on Arrow Route at Railroad Spur Crossing. The Agreement includes, but is not limited to, removing existing rubber crossing and installation of a new concrete crossing surface from the edge of the pavement on the north side of the tracks to the edge of pavement on the south of the tracks and raising of the existing tracks by 2 inches to create smoother ride. The new crossing surface will adequately cover all lanes across Arrow Route. A vicinity map illustrating the location is included as Attachment 1. ANALYSIS: The scope of work for the contractor consists of construction of new curb and gutter, sidewalks, driveways grading, cold milling of existing asphalt paving, pavement overlay, raising all the Page 1 of 3 Page 105 existing utilities to new overlay asphalt surface and re-striping. BNSF will perform all necessary track work to accommodate the new concrete crossing surface within the right-of-way. Construction is anticipated to take place over one weekend from Friday night to Sunday morning in October 2020. Once a more detailed schedule is coordinated with BNSF and the contractor, staff will work to provide appropriate outreach to share information on the necessary road closure The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published in the Daily Bulletin on July 21 and July 28, 2020. The City Clerk's Office facilitated the formal solicitation for bidding the project. On August 4, 2020, the City Clerk's office received eight (8) construction bids. The Engineer's estimate for the project was $65,219. The apparent low bidder, TSR Construction & Inspection, submitted a bid in the amount of $81,355. Since this bid is 20% higher than anticipated in the Engineer's Estimate, staff reviewed it closely and believes that the higher costs are attributable to higher than anticipated railroad traffic control costs and possibly the uncertainty surrounding economic impacts of COVID-19. After review, staff believes this bid to be reasonable and recommends awarding the project. A full bid summary is included as Attachment 2. The Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds that the lowest responsive bidder TSR Construction & Inspection meets the requirements of the bid documents Environmental: Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Section 15301 "Existing Facilities" subsection (c), Class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). FISCAL IMPACT: Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows: Expenditure Category Amount Construction Contract $81,355 Construction Contract Contingency 10% $8,136 BNSF Fair Share Cost $16,850 Estimated Construction Costs $106,341 Although previously budgeted for construction in Fiscal Year 2017/18 in the amount of $75,000, the Crossing Surface Improvements at Arrow Route Railroad Crossing Project was delayed due to delays in coordinating the Agreement between the City and BNSF. Current funding available for this project in the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Budget is as follows. Account No. Funding Source Description Amount 1001318-5300 Street Maintenance Fund (001) Contract Services $30,000 Total Project Funding $30,000 A deficit of $76,341 exists and must be funded in order to proceed with construction. Sufficient funding is available in the Gas Tax R&T7360 Fund (Fund 174) and Measure I Page 2 of 3 Page 106 Fund (Fund 177) fund balance for this project. An appropriation in the amount of$38,200 from the Gas Tax R&T7360 (Fund 174) and an appropriation in the amount of $38,200 from Measure I (Fund 177) fund balance into the following project accounts is required to cover the anticipated construction costs. Funds will be utilized to pay fair share costs for the new concrete crossing surface, in addition to the cost of street construction required as part of the project Account No. Funding Source Description Amount 1 1 77303-5300/1 81 91 77-0 Measure I Fund (177) Contract Services $ 38,200 1 1 74303-5300/1 81 91 74-0 Gas tax R&T7360 Fund (174) Contract Services $38,200 Total Project Appropriation $76,400 COUNCIL GOAL ADDRESSED: ENHANCING PREMIER COMMUNITY STATUS This item addresses City Council Goal of Public Safety by installing new concrete crossing surface and upgrading the track. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Vicinity Map Attachment 2 — Bid Summary Page 3 of 3 Page 107 ATTACHMENT 1 CROSSING SURFACE IMPROVEMENT AT ARROW ROUTE RAILROAD CROSSING PROJECT VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ........ ........... .. i a Project Site N Page 108 ATTACHMENT 2 BID SUMMARY FORBID OPENING August 3,2020 APPARENT LOW BIDDER 2 3 4 CROSSING SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS AT ARROW ROUTE RAILROAD CROSSING ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TSR Construction and Inspection All American Asphalt EBS General Engineering CT&T Concrete Paving BASE BID A UNIT UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1 1 LS MOBILIZATION 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 16,500.00 $ 16,500.00 $ 13,930.00 $ 13,930.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 2 4,340 SF COLD PLANE 1.5"TO 3"THICKNESS 2.53 $ 10,958.50 $ 2.00 $ 8,680.00 $ 1.50 $ 6,510.00 $ 1.80 $ 7,812.00 $ 5.00 $ 21,700.00 3 79 TN ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 100.00 $ 7,900.00 $ 170.00 $ 13,430.00 $ 166.50 $ 13,153.50 $ 273.00 $ 21,567.00 $ 150.00 $ 11,850.00 4 140 LF REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER 12.00 $ 1,680.00 $ 60.00 $ 8,400.00 $ 31.50 $ 4,410.00 $ 68.00 $ 9,520.00 $ 100.00 $ 14,000.00 5 715 SF REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY 12.00 $ 8,580.00 $ 15.00 $ 10,725.00 $ 9.50 $ 6,792.50 $ 13.00 $ 9,295.00 $ 20.00 $ 14,300.00 61 590 1 SF I REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK 15.00 $ 8,850.00 $ 8.00 $ 4,720.00 $ 7.50 $ 4,425.00 $ 11.10 $ 6,549.00 $ 12.00 $ 7,080.00 7 300 SF SIDEWALK 14.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 10.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 8.50 $ 2,550.00 $ 11.10 $ 3,330.00 $ 12.00 $ 3,600.00 8 1 EA ADJUST MANHOLE COVER TO FINISH GRADE 750.00 $ 750.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 850.00 $ 850.00 $ 975.00 $ 975.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 9 1 EA ADJUST WATER VALVE BOX&COVER TO FINISH GRADE 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 280.00 $ 280.00 $ 875.00 $ 873.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 10 1 EA ADJUST GAS VALVE BOX&COVER TO FINISH GRADE 600.00 $ 600.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 280.00 $ 280.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 11 1 LS COMPLETE IN PLACE 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 4,482.00 $1 4,482.00 $ 4,554.00 $ 4,554.00 12 1 LS TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ losoo.00 $ losoo.0o $ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 8,500.0o $ 8,500.00 131 1 1 LS I BNSF FLAGGING ALLOWANCE 1 15,000.001$ 15,000.00 1$ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 1$ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 1$ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 BID $ 79,355.00 TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT $ 65,218.50 CORRECTED $ 81,355.001 1$ 87,651.00 $ 101,810.00 $ 109,584.00 5 6 7 8 Onyx Paving Co. Tryon General Engineering Hardy and Harper,Inc. Atom Engineering Construction UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID NO OTY UNI DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1 1 LS IMOBILIZATION $ 4,644.40 $ 4,644.40 $ 7,580.00 $ 7,580.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 2 4,340 SF ICOLD PLANE 1.5"TO 3"THICKNESS $ 1.69 $ 7,334.60 $ 3.52 $ 15,276.80 $ 5.00 $ 21,700.00 $ 1.80 $ 7,812.00 3 79 TN ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT $ 169.00 $ 13,351.00 $ 178.50 $ 14,101.50 $ 202.00 $ 15,938.00 $ 370.00 $ 29,230.00 4 140 LF REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER $ 69.00 $ 9,660.00 $ 99.00 $ 13,860.00 $ 93.00 $ 13,020.00 $ 83.00 $ 11,620.00 5 715 SF REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING DRIVEWAY $ 16.00 $ 11,440.00 $ 23.00 $ 16,445.00 $ 18.00 $ 12,870.00 $ 17.00 $ 12,155.00 6 590 SF REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK $ 13.00 $ 7,670.00 $ 22.00 $ 12,980.00 $ 16.00 $ 9,440.00 $ 29.00 $ 17,110.00 7 300 SF SIDEWALK $ 13.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 23.00 $ 6,900.00 $ 16.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 21.00 $ 6,300.00 81 1 EA ADJUST MANHOLE COVER TO FINISH GRADE $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,735.00 $ 3,735.00 9 1 EA ADJUST WATER VALVE BOX&COVER TO FINISH GRADE $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,510.00 $ 1,510.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 10 1 EA ADJUST GAS VALVE BOX&COVER TO FINISH GRADE $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,210.00 $ 1,210.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 1$ 2,300.00 $ 2,300.00 11 1 1 LS ICOMPLETE IN PLACE $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 6,595.00 $ 6,595.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 7,600.00 12 1 1 LS ITRAFFIC CONTROL $ 27,000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 26,900.00 $ 26,900.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 7,800.00 13 1 1 LS I BNSF FLAGGING ALLOWANCE $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 1$ 15,000.00 1$ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT $ 111,000.00 $ 118,208.30 $ 133,088.00 $ 134,962.00 Page 109 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JW J DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Approval and Execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Newcastle Partners, Inc. for Property Commonly Known as APN 0229-021-97-0000 Generally Located at the North East Corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement, for the disposition of surplus property commonly known as APN 0229-021-97-0000, generally located at the north east corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue (Subject Property), and authorize the City Manager to execute documents related to the disposition of Subject Property. BACKGROUND: In 2015 the City acquired the Subject property and has remained vacant since its acquisition. On May 20, 2020 the City Council approved a resolution (See Attachment 1) declaring pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that real property owned by the City located at the north east corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue (APN: 0229-021-97-0000) is surplus land and not necessary for the City's use, finding that such declaration is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. ANALYSIS: The Subject Property is approximately 2.41 acres of vacant unimproved land zoned General Industrial in the City's industrial area. Since its acquisition in 2015 the property has not been necessary for City use. Upon declaring the property surplus, the City received an unsolicited offer to sell the property. The attached Purchase and Sale Agreement (See Attachment 2) outlines the terms and condition of the sale. The close of escrow is anticipated to occur no later than December 15, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the City's General Fund as a result of this action. Proceeds from the sale of the property will go back to Capital Reserves Fund where the original funding came from. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This action does not specifically address a City Council goal; however, this action is consistent with the City Council's decision on May 20, 2020 to declare the Subject Property surplus. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment— 1 Resolution No. 2020-037 Attachment— 2 Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions Page 110 Recorded in Official Records RECORDING REQUESTED BY County of San Bernardino City of Rancho Cucamonga Bob Dutton AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL DOCUMENT TO: Assessor-Recorder-County Clerk DOC N 2020-0192133 NAME CityClerk 06/11/2020 Titles: 1 Pages: 6 STREET 08:09 AM ADDRESS P.O. Box 807 SAN Fees: 0.00 Taxes: 0.00 G8467 CA SB2 Fee: 0.00 STATE g Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Total: 0.00 ZIP CODE Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Govt.Cod.Sec.27383 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY Resolution No. 2020-037 Title of Document TH , S A R'' EA'11 FOR RECOR' ' DIIIER 3 Ly' U,SE ON THIS COVER SHEET ADDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION Page 111 Page112 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54221 THAT REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE (APN: 0229-021-97-0000) IS SURPLUS LAND AND NOT NECESSARY FOR THE CITY'S USE, FINDING THAT SUCH DECLARATION IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND TAKING RELATED ACTIONS. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and made a part of hereof("Property"); and WHEREAS, under the Surplus Property Land Act, Government Code Sections 54220-54233 ("Act"), surplus land is land owned in fee simple by the City for which the City Council takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary for the City's use. The land must be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land; and WHEREAS, under the Act, land is necessary for the City's use if the land is being used, or is planned to be used pursuant to a written plan adopted by the City Council, for City work or operations; and WHEREAS, the Property is vacant industrial zoned land and is not currently being used by the City; and WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for City work or operations; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the City's use; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to declare that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the City's use; and WHEREAS, the Act requires that before the City Council disposes of the Property or engages in negotiations to dispose of the Property, the City shall send a written notice of availability of the Property to certain designated entities; and WHEREAS, the accompanying staff report provides supporting information upon which the declaration and findings set forth in this Resolution are based; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Resolution No. 2020-037 - Page 1 of 5 Page 113 Section 2. The City Council hereby declares that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the City's use. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a notice of availability, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part of hereof, to the entities designated in Government Code Section 54222 ("Designated Entities") by electronic mail or by certified mail. Section 4. This Resolution has been reviewed with respect to the applicability of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"). Section 5. The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15062. Section 6. The officers and staff of the City are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Resolution No. 2020-037 - Page 2 of 5 Page 114 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 2020. L. Dennis Michael, May ATTEST: k 4nice C. Reynol s, City Cler k STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) 1, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 20th day of May 2020. AYES: Hutchison, Kennedy, Michael, Scott, Spagnolo NOES: None ABSENT: None CI-10 ABSTAINED: None `O� CVO Q.O= NC?V 00, :�= O` =077 :g4 Executed this 21 st day of May, 2020, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. l% * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IS A CORRECT -. J COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. ATTEST: MAI 20 � 4'- JI nice C. Reynolds,Clerk LINDAA.TROYAN,MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR MH O CUC GA,CAL 7NIA SY: Resolution No. 2020-037 - Page 3 of 5 Page 115 Exhibit A Legal Description. The west 350.05 feet of Lot 105 of Map of Rochester, In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per Map filed in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, records of said County, together with the east 60 feet of Orange Avenue adjoining said lot on the west, vacated and abandoned by order of Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, A Certified Copy of which was recorded December 18, 1936, in Book 1177, Page 320 of Official Records excepting therefrom that portion of property conveyed to the County of San Bernardino by Deed Recorded September 28, 1925 in Book 17, page 414 of official record. Resolution No. 2020-037 - Page 4 of 5 Page 116 Exhibit B NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF SURPLUS LAND TO: Whom It May Concern (Via Electronic Mail [and/or] Certified Mail) RE: Notice of Availability of Surplus Land in the City of Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54220, et seq. Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 54220, et seq., the City of hereby notifies interested parties of the availability for lease or purchase of the following surplus City-owned land: Property Address: Assessor Parcel No.: Lot Size: Lot Width: Lot Depth Zoning: General Plan Designation: Current Use: [INSERT OR ATTACH AERIAL IMAGE AND/OR ASSESSOR MAP] [INSERT OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION] An entity or association desiring to purchase or lease the above-described surplus land for any of the purposes authorized by Government Code Section 54222, must notify the City in writing of its interest in purchasing or leasing the land within 60 days of the date of this Notice of Availability as indicated by the date set forth below. Please send written notices of interest to: City of City Clerk For further information, please send e-mail inquiries to: at or call at By Date Resolution No. 2020-037 - Page 5 of 5 Page 117 Page 118 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS Approximately 2.417 Acres Rancho Cucamonga, California SELLER: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUYER: NEWCASTLE PARTNERS, INC. Dated: August 5, 2020 44389/0961 TLP15595717 Page 119 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS (the "Agreement") is dated as of August 2020 (the "Effective Date") and is entered into by and between NEWCASTLE PARTNERS, INC., a California corporation ("Buyer"), and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("Seller"). Recitals A. Seller owns that certain parcel of vacant land described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"). B. Buyer desires to acquire the Property from Seller, and Seller desires to convey the Property to Buyer. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants in this Agreement, and other consideration the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Buyer and Seller hereby agree as follows: 1. Purchase and Sale. Seller agrees to sell the Property to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to purchase the Property from Seller, subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 2. D.pening and CIosing of Escrow. Within five (5) business days after the Effective Date, Buyer and Seller shall deliver a copy of this fully executed Agreement to, and shall open an escrow (the "Escrow") with, First American Title Insurance Company the "Escrow Holder" or "Title Company"). As used herein,the term "Close of Escrow" shall mean that a grant deed for the Property with a "Certificate of Acceptance, in the forms attached hereto as Exhibit B have been is recorded in the Official Records of the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office in accordance with and subject to the terms hereof. The Close of Escrow or Closing shall occur no later than December 15, 2020 (such actual closing date on or prior to such deadline is hereinafter referred to as the"Closing Date"). 3. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property ("Purchase Price") shall be THREE MILLION ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($3,164,700.00). 4. Deposit. Within ten (10) days following the Effective Date, Buyer shall deliver immediately-available funds in the amount of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00) to Escrow Holder, to be deposited in an interest-bearing account and held as an earnest money deposit under the Escrow pursuant to the terms and provisions hereof (which earnest money deposit, together with the interest thereon, is herein called the "Deposit"). The Deposit shall be: (a) applicable to the Purchase Price at the Close of Escrow; or (b) refunded to 1 44389/0961 TLPI559571.7 Page 120 Buyer if the Close of Escrow does not occur for any reason other than Buyer's default. Seller and Buyer agree that: (x) a portion of the Deposit in the amount of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) (the "Independent Contract Consideration") has been bargained for as consideration for Seller's execution and delivery of this Agreement; and (y) the Independent Contract Consideration is independent of any other consideration or payment provided for in this Agreement and is non-refundable in all events, and shall be released by Escrow Holder to Seller immediately upon receipt by Escrow Holder. 4.1 Buyer Default. IF CLOSING FAILS TO OCCUR SOLELY BECAUSE OF BUYER'S UNCURED DEFAULT, SELLER WILL BE DAMAGED AND WILL BE ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR THOSE DAMAGES, BUT SUCH DAMAGES WILL BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT AND IMPRACTICAL TO ASCERTAIN. BUYER DESIRES TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES FOR WHICH BUYER MIGHT BE LIABLE SHOULD BUYER BREACH THIS AGREEMENT. BOTH BUYER AND SELLER WISH TO AVOID THE COSTS AND LENGTHY DELAYS THAT WOULD RESULT IF SELLER FILED A LAWSUIT TO COLLECT ITS DAMAGES FOR A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF CLOSING FAILS TO OCCUR BECAUSE OF BUYER'S UNCURED DEFAULT, THEN THE DEPOSIT SHALL BE DEEMED TO CONSTITUTE A REASONABLE AND FINAL ESTIMATE OF SELLER'S DAMAGES AND SHALL BE RETAINED BY SELLER AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AS SELLER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY. SELLER AND BUYER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AND BY THEIR INITIALS IMMEDIATELY BELOW AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ITS TERMS. THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE PAYMENT OF SUCH LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IS NOT INTENDED AS A FORFEITURE OR PENALTY WITHIN THE MEANING OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 3275 OR 3369, BUT IS INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE LIQUIDATED DAMAGES TO SELLER PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 1671, 1676 AND 1677. 4.2 Seller Default. IF THE CLOSING FAILS TO OCCUR SOLELY BECAUSE OF SELLER'S UNCURED DEFAULT, THEN BUYER MAY ELECT, AS BUYER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY THEREFOR, TO EITHER: (A) TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT AND RECEIVE A REFUND OF THE DEPOSIT,AND SELLER SHALL REIMBURSE BUYER FOR BUYER'S ACTUAL, VERIFIABLE, DIRECT OUT-OF-POCKET COSTS INCURRED WITH RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT AND THE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREIN NOT TO EXCEED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00), IN WHICH EVENT NEITHER PARTY SHALL HAVE ANY FURTHER RIGHTS OR OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED HEREIN; OR (B) ENFORCE SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION 4 SHALL SURVIVE THE TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT. T��, B EWS I ITAI,S SELLER'S INITIALS 2 44389/096/ TLP1559571.7 Page 121 5. Title. 5.1 Condition of Title-,Title Polic . It is a condition to the Close of Escrow that Title Company be irrevocably committed to issue to Buyer, upon the Close of Escrow, a standard owner's policy of title insurancein an amount equal to the Purchase Price, showing title to the Property vested in Buyer subject only to the Permitted Exceptions (as defined below) (the "Title Policy"). Buyer may elect to obtain an extended coverage owner's policy of title insurance ("Extended Policy"), provided that: (a) Buyer pays for all additional premiums and any other fees and costs attributable thereto; and (b) Buyer shall be solely responsible for the additional requirements for the issuance of the Extended Policy(such as an ALTA survey). 5.2 Permitted Exceptions. The term "Permitted Exceptions" as used herein shall mean the following described conditions and exceptions to title: 5.2.1 Matters affecting the condition of title created by or with the written consent of Buyer. 5.2.2 Liens for property taxes and assessments not yet payable. 5.2.3 Other exceptions to title disclosed by the Title Report (as defined below) that have not been disapproved in writing by Buyer prior to the end of the Contingency Period. 5.3 Title Report Review and Approval. Following the Effective Date, Buyer shall obtain a preliminary report from Title Company, together with the underlying documents relating to the Schedule B exceptions set forth therein (collectively, the "Title Report"). Buyer shall have until the end of the Contingency Period (as defined below) to review and approve the Title Report and to obtain and review an ALTA survey of the Property (the "Survey"). Buyer shall notify Seller in writing on or before the Contingency Date (as defined below) of any disapproved matters in the Title Report and/or Survey, and if Seller indicates it will not remove them by Close of Escrow(or if they are not so removed), Buyer may terminate the Agreement by written notice to Seller,the Deposit shall be returned to Buyer,and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder except as expressly set forth herein. Any matters not so disapproved shall be a part of the Permitted Exceptions;however,Buyer hereby objects to any and all monetary encumbrances that may appear in the Title Report(except for the lien for assessments, if any, not yet due), all of which shall be removed therefrom by Seller at no cost to Buyer, and none of which shall be Permitted Exceptions. 6. Suitability of Documents/Property. 6.1 Contingency Period. Seller shall deliver copies of all material non- privileged documents in Seller's possession relating to the Property (the "Due Diligence Documents") to Buyer within five (5) business days after the Effective Date. It is a condition precedent to the Close of Escrow for Buyer's benefit that Buyer determines,during the period from the Effective Date until the date that is forty-five (45) days thereafter(the"Contingency Period") that the Property and title to the Property (including all title exceptions) are acceptable to Buyer. If Buyer determines, in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion,that the Due Diligence 3 44389/0961 TLP1559571.7 Page 122 Documents and/or the Property are not acceptable to Buyer, then Buyer may terminate this Agreement by written notice to Seller on or before the end of the Contingency Period in which case the Deposit shall be returned to Buyer and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder except as expressly set forth herein. 6.2 Right of Ent a. Inspections:Testin . During the Contingency Period,Buyer may conduct, at Buyer's sole expense, such inspections and testing of the Property, including the improvements thereon, as Buyer may desire or deem appropriate, in Buyer's sole and absolute discretion, to determine the suitability of the Property for Buyer's intended uses. Buyer shall reasonably repair and restores areas of the Property affected by Buyer's inspections so that they are in substantially the same condition as before such inspections as soon as reasonably possible. Seller hereby grants to Buyer and its authorized employees, representatives, agents and contractors,permission and a license, upon forty-eight(48)hours_prior written notice to Seller,to enter upon the Property at all reasonable times prior to the end of the Contingency Period for the purpose of conducting such inspections and testing. In the event the Property is occupied by any person(s) other than Seller, Seller shall make arrangements with such person(s) to ensure access by Seller its authorized employees, representatives, agents and contractors in order to conduct the inspections and testing pursuant to this Section 6.2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any such inspections or testing shall not unreasonably interfere with and shall be conducted in a manner as to minimize disruption of the tenant's use of the Property. Buyer shall indemnify, protect, defend (with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to Seller)and hold Seller harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses to the extent arising from, related to or caused by, Buyer's entry upon the Property or the performance of any inspection or test conducted by or at the request of Buyer or its contractors or agents, and the obligations of Buyer under this sentence shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 7. Seller's Acts. Seller shall not encumber, sell or transfer, or agree to encumber, sell or transfer, the Property or any portion thereof or interest therein during the period from the Effective Date to the earlier of: (a) the Close of Escrow; or(b)termination of this Agreement. 8. Representations and Warranties. 8.1 Seller's Representations. Seller warrants to Buyer as follows: 8.1.1 Seller has the full right, power and authority to sell the Property to Buyer as provided in this Agreement and to perform Seller's obligations hereunder. 8.1.2 Except as otherwise disclosed to Buyer, Seller has no actual knowledge of any current violations of any laws or requirements of any governmental agencies respecting the Property. 8.1.3 Except as disclosed in the Title Report, Seller has no actual knowledge of any leases, occupancy agreements, licenses, options to purchase, rights of first refusal sale or other agreements regarding the occupancy of the Property to which Seller is a party that will survive the Closing. 4 44389/0961 TLPI559571.7 Page123 8.2 Buyer_Representation. Buyer represents and warrants to Seller that Buyer has the full right, power and authority to purchase the Property from Seller as provided in this Agreement and to perform Buyer's obligations hereunder. 9. Deposit of Documents and Funds into Escrow. Seller and Buyer shall make the following deliveries to Escrow Holder at least one (1) business day prior to the Close of Escrow: 9.1 Buyer Deposits. Buyer shall deliver the Purchase Price (less the Deposit), and any additional funds required to pay costs payable by Buyer under Section l I below. 9.2 SelIer Deposits. Seller shall deliver the Grant Deed(duly executed by Seller and acknowledged), all federal and state tax withholding certificates so that the tax withholding is not required of Escrow or Seller;and a duly executed assignment in the form of Exhibit C attached hereto (the"General Assignment"). 10. Authorization to Record Documents and Disburse Funds. Upon the Close of Escrow. Escrow Holder is hereby authorized to record the Grant Deed and the Certificate of Acceptance, disburse funds to pay any liens encumbering the Property, apply funds to costs, deliver any remaining funds to Seller, and provide copies of the federal and state tax withholding certificates to Buyer(showing no withholding is required. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is also authorized to record at the Close of Escrow any instrument delivered through Escrow if necessary or proper for the issuance of the Title Policy. 11. Costs and Prorations. 11.1 Cost Allocations. Seiler shall pay: (a) all documentary transfer taxes respecting the transaction contemplated herein; (b) fifty percent (50%) of the fees and charges of Escrow Holder; and (c)the cost of the premium for the Title Policy (excluding extended coverage, which shall be paid by Buyer). Buyer shall pay: (x) fifty percent (50%) of the fees and charges of Escrow Holder; and (y) the cost of any Extended Policy(if required by Buyer). 11.2 Escrow Cancellation Costs. If the Escrow shall fail to close due to Buyer's default, Buyer shall pay all Escrow and Title Company cancellation charges if the Escrow shall fail to close due to Seller's default, Seller shall pay all Escrow and Title Company cancellation charges. If the Escrow shall fail to close for any reason other than Seller's or Buyer's default, Buyer and Seller shall each pay one-half (1/2) of any applicable Escrow or Title Company cancellation charges. 11.3 Prorations. Property taxes and assessments shall be apportioned and prorated with respect to the Property as of 12:01 a.m., on the day on which the Close of Escrow occurs, as if Buyer were vested with title to the Property during the entire day upon which the Close of Escrow occurs. To the extent that the actual assessments for the current year differ from the amount apportioned at the Close of Escrow, the parties shall make all necessary adjustments by appropriate payments between themselves following the Close of Escrow. All delinquent taxes and assessments (and any penalties therein) for periods prior to the Close of Escrow, if any, affecting the Property shall be paid by Seller. All prorations shall be determined on the basis of a three hundred sixty (360)-day year. 5 44389/0961 TLPJ559571.7 Page 124 11.4 The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 12. Buyer's Conditions. Buyer's obligations under this Agreement are expressly made subject to the following conditions precedent solely for the benefit of Buyer. The Close of Escrow and Buyer's obligation to consummate the purchase of Property shall be contingent upon and subject to written notice to Escrow Holder by Buyer of the occurrence of all of the following (or Buyer's written waiver thereof, it being agreed that Buyer can waive any or all such contingencies) on or before the Close of Escrow: 12.1 Title Company committing to issue the Title Policy in favor of Buyer with a liability amount in the amount of the Purchase Price showing Buyer's fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted Exceptions. 12.2 SeIler's delivery of all documents and funds required to be delivered by Seller under Section 9.2 above. If any of the foregoing conditions precedent has not been either met or expressly waived in writing by Buyer on or prior to the last date for the Close of Escrow, then Buyer may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Seller, in which case the Deposit shall be returned to Buyer and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder except as expressly set forth herein. 13. Seller's Conditions. For the benefit of Seller, the Close of Escrow and Seller's obligation to consummate the sale of the Property shall be contingent upon and subject to the Buyer delivering all documents and funds required to be delivered by Buyer under Section 8.1 above on or before the Close of Escrow. 14. Casualty: Condemnation. All risk of loss with respect to the Property shall remain with Seller until the Close of Escrow. If at any time after the Effective Date but prior to the Close of Escrow, the Property, or any portion thereof, is damaged by fire or other casualty, or taken or appropriated through eminent domain or similar proceedings, or condemned for any public or quasi-public use, then Buyer shall have the right, to be exercised within ten (10) days after obtaining actual knowledge of such casualty or condemnation, to terminate this Agreement, in which case and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder except as expressly set forth herein. 1f Buyer does not so terminate this Agreement,at the Close of Escrow Buyer shall be entitled to receive all insurance proceeds or all condemnation proceeds payable to Seller for the casualty or taking, or if such proceeds have been paid to Seller then Buyer shall receive a credit against the Purchase Price equal to the amount hereof. 15. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by certified mail, postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by reputable overnight messenger service, but must also be given by email. Notices shall be considered given upon the earlier of: (a) one (1) business day following delivery to a reputable overnight messenger service (such as Federal Express for overnight delivery);or(b)two(2)business days following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested (provided the notice is also given by mail). Notices shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided 6 44389/0961 TLP1559571.7 Page125 that if any party gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall thereafter be given as demanded in that notice: To Buyer: Newcastle Partners, Inc. 4740 Green River Road, Suite H 8 Corona, CA 92880 Attn: Jackson Smith and to: Newcastle Partners, Inc. 230 California Street, Suite 510 San Francisco, CA 94111 Attn: Todd Johnson To Seller: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: City Manager To Escrow Holder/ First American Title Insurance Company Title Company: 3281 East Guasti Road, Suite 440 Ontario, CA 91761 Attn: Kelly Simoneau 16. Broker's Commissions. Each party represents to the other that it has not engaged any broker, finder or salesperson in connection with this transaction. except Lee & Associates — Ontario, Inc. (Buyer's Broker). Upon the Close of Escrow, Buyer shall pay Buyer's Broker a commission in accordance with their separate agreement. Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold the other party harmless from and against any and all claims for any other broker's commissions or similar compensation that may be payable to any other broker, finder or other person or entity based upon such party's statement or acts. The provisions of this Section 16 shall survive the Close of Escrow. 17. Standard Escrow Instructions. Each party agrees to execute Escrow Holder's supplemental reasonable standard instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 18. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to each term, condition and covenant hereof in which time is a factor. 19. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall not be assigned by Buyer without the prior written consent of Seller, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Buyer shall have the right without Seller's consent to assign its interest in and/or rights under this Agreement to a partnership, corporation, limited liability company,joint venture,trust or similar entity in which Buyer or any of Buyer's principals (or any affiliated entities of any of them) own an interest or to which Buyer and/or its affiliates is 7 44389/0961 TLP1559571.7 Page 126 contractually obligated to provide real estate services. Any such assignment shall not release Buyer from any of its obligations or liability under this Agreement. Subject to the foregoing, the provisions of this Agreement are expressly binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their successors in interest and assigns. 20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement,together with all exhibits hereto, integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties or their predecessors in interest with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof. 21. Severability. Invalidation of any of the terms, conditions, covenants, or other provisions contained herein by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other terms, conditions, covenants, or provisions hereof, and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 22. Attorne sue' Fees. In the event that suit is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or as the result of any alleged breach thereof, the prevailing party or parties in such suit shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys' fees,costs,and expenses from the losing party or parties, and any judgment or decree rendered in such proceedings shall include an award thereof. 23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 24. Exchange. Either party (the "Exchanging Party") may consummate the transaction as part of a tax-deferred exchange pursuant to Section 1031 of the Code, and such Exchanging Party has the right to restructure all or part of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement as provided in Section 1031 of the Code as a concurrent or delayed (nonsimultaneous) tax-deferred exchange for the benefit of such Exchanging Party (an "Exchange") provided that the exchange does not delay the Close of Escrow, or cause the other party to incur any material costs. The other party shall reasonably cooperate with the Exchanging Party and, if requested by the Exchanging Party, shall reasonably accommodate the Exchanging Party with respect to any Exchange, provided that the Exchanging Party's election to effect an Exchange shall not create any additional conditions to the Closing or create any additional liabilities for the other party. The Exchanging Party, in electing to structure the transaction as an Exchange, shall have the right to substitute, assign, or delegate its rights and duties to one or more entities or persons who will be Exchanging Party's qualified intermediary as seller or buyer, as applicable, in the Escrow in the Exchanging Party's place and stead. Any such Exchange shall be accomplished by supplemental instructions reasonably acceptable to both parties (the "Exchange Instructions"), including any Exchange documents and instructions with a qualified intermediary. The other party shall execute and deliver to the Exchanging Party or Escrow Holder any and all Exchange Instructions provided to such party by the Exchanging Party within three (3) business days after the other party's receipt of such Exchange Instructions. Each party shall bear its own costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees and costs) incurred in connection with the preparation and review of the Exchange Instructions. 44389/0961 TLP1559571.7 Page 127 25. Further Assurances. Buyer and Seller agree to execute such other and further documents and instruments as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of this Agreement and to effectuate the transfer of the Property to Buyer. 26. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. For purposes of this Agreement, emailed (PDF) signatures shall be deemed to be original siZP gnatures,and shall be followed by the immediate overnight delivery of original signature pages. 27. Authority of City Manager. The City Manager of Seller shall have the authority to give all consents, approvals and notices by Seller hereunder provided they are in writing. [Signature Page Follows] 9 44389/096/ TLP1559571.7 Page 128 Signature Page to Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written. BUYER: SELLER: NEWCASTLE PARTNERS, INC., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a California corporation a municipal corporation By: By: Name: ennis D. Hi L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Title: President ATTEST: By: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: James Markman, City Attorney 10 44389/0961 Tl.P1559571.7 Page 129 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND [Forthcoming] A-1 44389/0961 TLP1559571.7 Page 130 EXHIBIT B FORM OF GRANT DEED SEE ATTACHED a B-1 44389/0961 TLP1559571.7 Page 131 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO AND MAIL PROPERTY TAX STATEMENTS TO: (APN: 0229-021-097) [SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY] The Undersigned Grantor Declares: Documentary Transfer Tax is $ The Property is in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino, California. GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,a municipal corporation("Grantor")hereby grants to ("Grantee"),the land located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,County of San Bernardino,State of California,more particularly described on Exhibit A, and all improvements and fixtures thereon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has duly executed this Grant Deed. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation By: Name: Title: B-2 44389/0961 TLP/559571.7 Page 132 Exhibit A to Grant Deed Legal Description [Forthcoming] B-3 44389/0961 TLP/559571.7 Page133 CALIFORNIA ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On before me, Notary Public, personally appeared ,who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s)is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity(ies) upon behalf of which the person(s)acted,executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public B-4 44389/0961 TLP1559571.7 Page 134 Form of Certificate of Acceptance [Forthcoming] B-5 4438910961 TLP1559571.7 Page135 EXHIBIT C FORM OF GENERAL ASSIGNMENT THIS GENERAL ASSIGNMENT (this "Assignment") is made as of , 2020 by the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("Assignor"), in favor of , a ("Assignee"). Recitals A. Pursuant to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated as of July 15, 2020 between Assignor, as Seller, and Assignee, as Buyer (the "Agreement"), Assignee has on the date hereof purchased from Assignor certain Property identified in the Agreement. Any term herein with its initial letter capitalized and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. B. Under the terms and conditions of the Agreement, it was contemplated that Assignor would deliver this Assignment to Assignee at the Close of Escrow. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged: I. Assignor hereby irrevocably transfers, sets over, conveys and assigns to Assignee,without representgtion or warranty,express or implied,any and all of Assignor's right, title and interest (if any) in and to all licenses, certificates of occupancy, permits, approvals, intangible property, warranties, guaranties, privileges, tenements and other appurtenances belonging to or appertaining to the Property (collectively, the "Intangible Property"), to have and to hold all of the foregoing Intangible Property unto the Assignee, its successors and assigns, from and after the date hereof, subject to the terms, covenants, conditions and provisions contained herein. 2. This Assignment and the obligations of Assignor hereunder shall be binding upon Assignor and inure to the benefit of Assignee and Assignee's successors and assigns. 3. This Assignment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 4. If any action or proceeding is commenced by Assignee against Assignor to enforce its rights under this Assignment, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be awarded all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in such action or proceeding, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in addition to any other relief awarded by the court. [Signature Page Follows] C-1 44389/0961 TLP1559571.7 Page 136 Signature Page to General Assignment IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor has executed this Assignment as of the date first above written. ASSIGNOR: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation By: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: By: Janice C. Reynolds, City Cleric APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: James Markman, City Attorney C-2 Page 137 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution No. 2020-093, Authorizing Application for and Receipt of Local Early Action Planning Grant Program Funds. (RESOLUTION NO. 2020- 093) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving the application for specified grant funds. BACKGROUND: Increasing the availability of affordable homes statewide is critical to bettering the quality of life of all Californians and to ending homelessness. In the 2019-20 Budget Act, Governor Gavin Newsom allocated $250 million for all regions, cities, and counties to do their part by prioritizing planning activities that accelerate housing production to meet identified needs of every community. With this allocation, HCD established the Local Early Action Planning Grant Program (LEAP) with $119 million for cities and counties. LEAP provides one-time grant funding to cities and counties to update their planning documents and implement process improvements that will facilitate the acceleration of housing production and help local governments prepare for their 6th cycle RHNA. The City is eligible for$500,000 in funding for this round. As required in the grant application, the Council must adopt a resolution authorizing the City to apply for the LEAP Planning Grant funds and authorize a designee (City Manager) to execute the grant agreement upon award. This resolution was previously approved by the Council on May 6, 2020, prior to the application being sent to HCD for consideration. After review, HCD asked the City to revise the text of the resolution to provide additional clarity designating the City Manager to execute the grant agreement upon award. The attached resolution is amended based on recommended changed by HCD. ANALYSIS: If approved, the grant funding will be used to replace city funding currently allocated for PlanRC General Plan activities related to housing, including: 1. Activities relating to the development of the housing element. The housing element is required to be updated based on the 6th cycle Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA). 2. Development of plans for targeted areas within the City to support mixed use, higher density, pedestrian scale development. 3. Updates to the Development Code to streamline housing review and approval through the adoption of form-based codes for multi-family developments and objective design standards for all residential development. Page 138 4. A comprehensive General Plan EIR that will help reduce or eliminate the need for additional environmental review for specific development areas. FISCAL IMPACT: This funding will primarily be used to replace existing general fund dollars allocated toward these planning efforts COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This grant funding, if awarded will allow us to continue working toward the Council goal to "Complete the General Plan and Housing Element through an inclusive process by Q4 2022" while freeing up City funds for other projects. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment— 1 Resolution Page 2 Page 139 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-OXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR, AND RECEIPT OF, LOCAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING SUPPORT GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code 50515 et. Seq,the Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is authorized to issue a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) as part of the Local Government Planning Support Grants Program (hereinafter referred to by the Department as the Local Early Action Planning Grants program or LEAP); and WHEREAS, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga desires to submit a LEAP grant application package ("Application"), on the forms provided by the Department, for approval of grant funding for projects that assist in the preparation and adoption of planning documents and process improvements that accelerate housing production and facilitate compliance to implement the sixth cycle of the regional housing need assessment; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to apply for and submit to the Department the Application package; SECTION 2. In connection with the LEAP grant, if the Application is approved by the Department, the City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to submit the Application, enter into, execute, and deliver on behalf of the Applicant, a State of California Agreement (Standard Agreement) for the amount of $500,000, and any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence and secure the LEAP grant, the Applicant's obligations related thereto, and all amendments thereto; and SECTION 3. The Applicant shall be subject to the terms and conditions as specified in the NOFA, and the Standard Agreement provided by the Department after approval. The Application and any and all accompanying documents are incorporated in full as part of the Standard Agreement. Any and all activities funded, information provided, and timelines represented in the Application will be enforceable through the fully executed Standard Agreement. Pursuant to the NOFA and in conjunction with the terms of the Standard Agreement, the Applicant hereby agrees to use the funds for eligible uses and allowable expenditures in the manner presented and specifically identified in the approved Application. SECTION 4. The City Manager is authorized to execute the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Grants Program application, the PGP Grant Documents, and any amendments thereto, on behalf of the City as required by the Department for receipt of the PGP Grant. Resolution No. 2020-Oxx - Page 1 of 2 Page 140 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 19t"day of August, 2020. Resolution No. 2020-Oxx - Page 2 of 2 Page 141 Olt, i I DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept The Cares Act Funding and Authorize the Appropriation of Funds for The RCCARES Programs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council accept the CARES Act funding and appropriate the funds for the RCCARES programs. BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act was passed by Congress and signed into law on March 27, 2020. Cities with a population of over 500,000 received a direct allocation from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, while cities below that threshold, such as Rancho Cucamonga, instead received an increased allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. The City's share of this funding was $604,816. On June 30, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom signed the 2020 Budget Act which included $500 million of the State's CARES Act funding to be distributed to California cities that did not previously receive a direct allocation from the Federal CARES Act. Under the formula identified in the 2020 Budget Act, the City of Rancho Cucamonga was allocated $2,167,450 in CARES Act funding. At the July 15, 2020 City Council meeting, an administrative hearing was conducted to receive public testimony. At the meeting, the City Council approved the RCCARES COVID-19 Community Relief Programs proposed by staff. These programs include the Rental Assistance Program, Rental Forgiveness Program, Outdoor Parking Lot Dining Guidance Partnership, County Business Assistance Program Match, COVID-19 Response Reimbursement and PPE Stockpile and Reimbursement for providing Paid Sick Leave and Medical Leave. On August 5, 2020, a public hearing was conducted to receive comments concerning the Amendment to the 2020-21 Action Plan to allocate Community Development Block Grant Funding from the CARES Act. The Amendment was approved to allocate $604,816 of CDBG-CV and $328,007 CDBG funds (total of $932,823) to eligible projects to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. ANALYSIS: The City is prepared to receive $2,167,450 in CARES Act funding from the State's allocation and $604,816 from the Federal allocation. The State's allocation will be received in multiple installments with the first installment of$361,199 already being received. The State highly encourages recipients to spend all funding by October 30, 2020. Considering the aggressive timeline, staff developed a robust strategy to deploy this funding into the community. Promotion for these programs has begun and the open application period begins on August 24, 2020. Page 1 of 2 Page 142 FISCAL IMPACT: The City is eligible to receive $2,167,450 in CARES Act funding from the State. Staff requests the City Council approve a $2,167,450 appropriation into account number 1275000-4750/2050-0 (Federal Grants Fund-Grant Income-Federal) to receive the grant funds. Staff requests the following appropriations to fund expenditures for the following programs: • 1275503-5200/2050-4200 (Federal Grants Fund-Operations and Maintenance): $617,450 Rental Assistance Program • 1275503-5200/2050-4201 (Federal Grants Fund- Operations and Maintenance): $750,000 Rental Forgiveness Program • 1275503-5200/2050-4202 (Federal Grants Fund- Operations and Maintenance): $100,000 Outdoor Parking Lot Dining Guidance Partnership • 1275503-5200/2050-4203 (Federal Grants Fund- Operations and Maintenance): $400,000 County Business Assistance Program Match • 1275503-5200/2050-4204 (Federal Grants Fund- Operations and Maintenance): $200,000 COVID-19 Response Reimbursement and PPE Stockpile • 1275503-5200/2050-4205 (Federal Grants Fund- Operations and Maintenance ): $100,000 COVID-19 Leave Reimbursement In addition, the following appropriations are requested to allocate Community Development Block Grant funding from the CARES Act and 2020-21 CDBG funds: • 1204000-4750/2050-0 (CDBG Fund-Grant Income-Federal): $604,820 1204000-4750 (CDBG Fund-Grant Income-Federal): $328,010 • 1204314-5650/2050204-0 (CDBG Fund-Capital Outlay): $120,970 CDBG-CV Administration • 1204314-5650/2050204-0 (CDBG Fund-Capital Outlay): $811,860 Emergency Housing Assistance COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Allocating this funding for community assistance programs supports all aspects of the City Council's vision and core values. Page 2 of 2 Page 143 01 JW CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 970 and Ordinance No. 971, Ordinances Amending Title 2 of the Municipal Code to Define the Functions and Obligations of the City Clerk and City Treasurer. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council conduct a second reading, by title only, and adopt Ordinance No. 970 and Ordinance No. 971, amending Title 2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to define the functions and obligations of the City Clerk and City Treasurer. BACKGROUND: The introduction and first reading of the above-entitled Ordinances was conducted at the Regular City Council Meeting of August 5, 2020. Vote at first reading: AYES: Michael, Kennedy, Hutchison, Scott, Spagnolo. ANALYSIS: Please refer to the August 5, 2020 City Council Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: Please refer to the August 5, 2020 City Council Staff Report. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Please refer to the August 5, 2020 City Council Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 970 Ordinance 971 Page 144 Ordinance No. 970 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEFINING THE FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY CLERK A. Recitals. (i) The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that it is the duty of the City Clerk to assist the City Manager in administering the affairs of the City efficiently, economically, and harmoniously. (ii) The specific functions and obligations of the City Clerk are contained in hundreds of state statutes as well as in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. (iii) It is the intent of this Council to adopt this Ordinance so that the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code succinctly delineates the basic functions and obligations of the City Clerk in accordance with the above-referenced legislative provisions. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it hereby is ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1. Section 2.08.290 hereby is added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "2.08.20. Functions and Obligations of the City Clerk. The City Clerk position is not full time, does not include a dedicated office or staff, and access to the City's computer network is restricted to ensure network security. Accordingly, day-to-day activity of the City Clerk is accomplished working in partnership with City staff, in particular the City Manager, as well as regular delegation of duties to the City Clerk Services Director while providing appropriate high-level review of the actions taken in support of the City Clerk function by the abovementioned individuals. The City Clerk Services Director shall be principally responsible for maintaining the City's records management system and carrying out those duties assigned to the City Clerk under this Code,unless a duty is otherwise required to be performed by the City Clerk under state law.„ Section 2. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason be held invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause,phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Page145 1123 1-000 1\2440927v2.doc PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2020. L. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of August, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk _2_ Page 146 1123 1-000 1\2440927v2.doc Ordinance No. 971 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEFINING THE FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY TREASURER A. Recitals. (i) Section 2.08.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that the City Treasurer is an independent elected City official. (ii) Section 2.08.210 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that the City Treasurer shall assist the City Manager in administering the affairs of the City efficiently and harmoniously. (iii) Section 2.08.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code charges the City Manager with the responsibility to keep the City Council fully advised of the financial condition and needs of the City at all times. (iv) Section 2.08.150 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires the City Manager to prepare and submit the proposed annual budget to the City Council for its approval. (v) Section 2.08.160 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires the City Manager to see that every City expenditure recommended to the City Council for the purchasing of supplies shall have been approved by the City Manager or his or her authorized representative. (vi) The specific functions and obligations of the City Treasurer are contained in over 100 state statutes as well as in this Municipal Code. (vii) It is the intent of this Council to adopt this Ordinance so that the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code succinctly delineates the basic functions and obligations of the City Treasurer in accordance with the above-referenced legislative provisions while ensuring that the City Treasurer works in partnership with the City Manager and the City Council to provide effective, efficient and timely governmental services. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it hereby is ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1. Section 2.08.280 hereby is added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "2.08.280. Functions and Obligations of the City Treasurer "A. The primary and core functions of the City Treasurer are to collect, maintain, invest and expend funds of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as prescribed in this Municipal Code and in accordance with the provisions of state legislation. In performing those functions, Page 147 1123 1-000 1\2436251 v l.doc the City Treasurer is obligated to do so in accordance with the appropriate processing of proposed expenditures by the City Manager and his or her staff and in accordance with the decisions of the City Council made in adopting budgets and approving specific expenditures. `B. The City Treasurer position is not full time and does not include staffing, or an office, and access to the City's computer network is restricted to ensure network security. Accordingly, day-to-day activity of the City Treasurer is accomplished working in partnership with City staff, in particular the City Manager and Finance Director, as well as regular delegation of duties to the Deputy City Treasurer/Deputy City Manager while providing appropriate high-level review of the actions taken in support of the Treasury function by the abovementioned individuals. "C. The City Treasurer should be reasonably satisfied that all required processing procedures performed by the City Manager or his or her staff and any required approval of the City Council support the City Treasurer in turn processing and placing his or her required signature on City of Rancho Cucamonga checks and other forms of payment. The City Treasurer is not authorized to audit or attempt to modify decisions made by the City Manager or his or her staff or the City Council which support a City of Rancho Cucamonga expenditure of funds." Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2020. L. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of August, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk -2- Page 148 1123 1-000 1\2436251 v l.doc CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 19, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council (City Clerk's Office) FROM: The City Clerk's Office BY: Linda Troyan, MMC SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE FOR ITEM F1. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 970 AND ORDINANCE NO. 971, ORDINANCES AMENDING TITLE 2 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO DEFINE THE FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER. (ORDINANCE NO. 970 AND ORDINANCE NO. 971) City Council, Additional correspondence was received for Agenda Item F1: F1 . Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 970 and Ordinance No. 971 , Ordinances Amending Title 2 of the Municipal Code to Define the Functions and Obligations of the City Clerk and City Treasurer. (ORDINANCE NO. 970 AND ORDINANCE NO. 971) Two (2) letters received: 1. Dan Titus — Letter in Opposition 2. Linnie Drolet — Letter in Opposition Page 1 of 1 RECEIVED AUG 19 2020 CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: August 19, 2020 To: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council: Email delivery w/ attachments, City Clerk's Office, Linda.Troyan@cityofrc.us Cc: Copies for the Public Record From: Dan Titus, Alta Loma, California - Email: FutureEarthUS@gmail.com Subject: City Council Agenda, Item F1: Ordinance No. 970 and 971 Usurped Authority & Potential Liability City Council will have "second reading" of Ordinance 970 and 971 —to turn elected City Treasurer and City Clerk, elected watchdogs, into marginalized "lapdogs". At last City Council meeting, all appeared ready to vote "yes." The City manager and staff have overstepped their authority in constraining "functions and obligations of the city Clerk and city Treasurer, both elected positions. They have usurped authority, constraining transparency and checks and balances provided by State Law. The proposed ordinances denote serious conflicts with State Law and presents liability to the City, and its designated agents. 1. Ordinance 971: City Treasurer California State Law already defines job duties of ELECTED CITY TREASURER with oversight responsibility and powers including appointing deputies for help. The City Treasurer, as an elected official, maintains an autonomous, independent, role. The Rancho City Council forbids elected Treasurer to appoint deputies or even have an office, and limits access to City's computer financial information. Rancho City Council's proposed Ordinance gives City's financial responsibility and powers to hired City Manager John Gillison and hired City Treasurer Jim Harrington and gives the power of a "rubber stamp only" to elected City Treasurer. (iii) Section 2.08.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code charges the City Manager with the responsibility to keep the City Council fully advised of the financial condition and needs of the City at all times. 1 (iv) Section 2.08.150 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires the City Manager to prepare and submit the proposed annual budget to the City Council for its approval. (v) Section 2.08.160 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires the City Manager to see that every City expenditure recommended to the City Council for the purchasing of supplies shall have been approved by the City Manager. Though not State Law, Section 1, 2.08.280 C, The City Treasurer is not authorized to audit or attempt to modify decisions made by the City Manager or his or her staff or the City Council which support a City of Rancho Cucamonga expenditure of funds. California State Code: City Treasurer CHAPTER 3. City Treasurer [41001 - 41007] ( Chapter 3 added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79. ) 41001. The city treasurer shall receive and safely keep all money the treasurer receives. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 77, Sec. 1. (SB 742) Effective January 1, 2018.) 41002. (a) The city treasurer shall comply with all laws governing the deposit and securing of public funds and the handling of trust funds in his or her possession. (b) If the city has issued bonds, the city treasurer shall use a system of accounting and auditing that adheres to generally accepted accounting principles.(Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 77, Sec. 2. (SB 742) Effective January 1, 2018.) 41003. The city treasurer shall pay out money only on warrants signed by legally designated persons. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 77, Sec. 3. (SB 742) Effective January 1, 2018.) 41004. Regularly, at least once each month, the city treasurer shall submit to the city clerk a written report and accounting of all receipts, disbursements, and fund balances. The city treasurer shall file a copy with the legislative body. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 77, Sec. 4. (SB 742) Effective January 1, 2018.) 41005. The city treasurer shall perform such duties relative to the collection of city taxes and license fees as are prescribed by ordinance. (Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 41006. The city treasurer may appoint deputies. (Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 77, Sec. 5. (SB 742) Effective January 1, 2018.) 2 41007. The deputies shall hold office at the pleasure of the city treasurer and receive such compensation as is provided by the legislative body. (Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 2. Ordinance 970: City Clerk California State Law already defines job duties of ELECTED CITY CLERK with huge responsibilities for transparency of City records. Rancho City Council's proposed Ordinance does not even give an office and "access to the City's computer system is restricted." City Council gives powers the State lists for City Clerk to The hired City Clerk Services Director, Janice Reynolds: City Council states that the elected City Clerk is to take directions from the hired City Clerk Services Director. Therefore, City Council restricts elected City Clerk to a"rubber stamp." California State Code: City Clerk GOVERNMENT CODE - GOV TITLE 4. GOVERNMENT OF CITIES [34000 - 45345] ( Title 4 added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79. ) DIVISION 3. OFFICERS [36501 - 41805] (Division 3 added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79. ) PART 3. OTHER OFFICERS [40601 - 41805] ( Part 3 added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79. ) CHAPTER 2. City Clerk [40801 - 40814] ( Chapter 2 added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79. ) 40801. The city clerk shall keep an accurate record of the proceeding of the legislative body and the board of equalization in books bearing appropriate titles and devoted exclusively to such purposes, respectively. The books shall have a comprehensive general index. (Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 40802. The city clerk is the accounting officer of the city and shall maintain records readily reflecting the financial condition of the city. (Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 40804. The city clerk shall cause a summary of the city's financial report required by Section 53891, in a form prescribed by the Controller, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation, pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 6000) of Chapter 1 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code. If there is no newspaper, 3 the city clerk shall cause copies of the statement to be posted in three public places in the city designated by ordinance as the places for posting of public notices. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 467, Sec. 42. (SB 1498) Effective January 1, 2019.) 40805. The report shall be published or posted consistent with the timelines established in Section 53891 after the close of the fiscal year for which the report is compiled. (Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 366, Sec. 10. (SB 974) Effective January 1, 2017.) 40805.5. The financial and accounting duties imposed upon the city clerk by Sections 40802 through 40805 may be transferred to a director of finance when such office has been established and the powers and duties thereof defined by ordinance. (Added by Stats. 1955, Ch. 1754.) 40806. The city clerk shall keep a book marked "ordinances" and record in it all city ordinances with a certificate annexed to each, stating: (a) It is a true and correct copy of a city ordinance. (b) The ordinance number. (c) It has been published or posted pursuant to law. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 467, Sec. 43. (SB 1498) Effective January 1, 2019.) 40807. The record with the certificate is prima facie evidence of the contents of each ordinance and of its passage and publication. It is admissible as such evidence in any court or proceedings.(Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 40808. The official city records in the custody of the city clerk shall not be filed in any court proceeding or other action but shall be returned to the custody of the city clerk. (Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 40809. This article does not prevent the proof of the passage and publication of ordinances in the usual way. (Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 40810. The city clerk is the ex officio assessor unless the legislative body provides for the assessment and collection of city taxes by county officers or otherwise. (Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 40811. The city clerk is the custodian of the city seal. (Added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) 4 40812. The city clerk shall perform any additional duties as are prescribed by ordinance.(Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 467, Sec. 44. (SB 1498) Effective January 1, 2019.) 40813. The city clerk may appoint deputies, for whose acts the city clerk and the city clerk's bondspersons are responsible. The deputies shall hold office at the pleasure of the city clerk and receive the compensation as provided by the legislative body. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 467, Sec. 45. (SB 1498) Effective January 1, 2019.) 40814. The city clerk and the city clerk's deputies may administer oaths or affirmations and take and certify affidavits and depositions pertaining to city affairs and business which may be used in any court or proceedings in the state. The acknowledgment of an instrument may be made before a city clerk and the city clerk's deputies within the city in which they were elected or appointed. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 467, Sec. 46. (SB 1498) Effective January 1, 2019.) s RECEIVED AUG 19 2020 August 19, 2020 CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Clerks Office City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA To the City Council, Attached is my response to two proposed Ordinances, 970 and 971. Both are up for a second reading on the calendar for tonight council meeting. I am deeply concerned from the tone of the Ordinances being proposed, that all is not well in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Seems like a direct attempt is being made to circumvent our elected officials, the City Clerk and the Treasurer. Does the City Council or the City Manager, or both have an issue? Or are the City Clerk and Treasurer or both trying to circumvent the laws they operate by? Which is it? I went looking through the website for the organizational chart and could not find it there. Possibly there is confusion over who is responsible for what job or task. It seems evident that something is not working. These two ordinances I fear will only confuse the situation further. These two elected offices represent the people of the city, as does the city council, there are checks and balances to safeguard the people. Also, the city clerk is an elected office representing the people, since you want to change the status from elected to appointed; State Code 36508. denotes you must submit the question to the electors. They also give you the wording of the question in 36509. Code for the election too. I prefer that these two offices are elected, not appointed. Checks on and designation of authority's means less possibility for corruption. I strongly oppose these two badly written and unclear Ordinances 970 & 971. Regards, Linnie M Drolet Foothill Tax Payers Association Ordinance No. 971 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEFINING THE FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY TREASURER A. Recitals. (i) Section 2.08.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that the City Treasurer is an independent elected City official. (ii) Section 2.08.210 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that the City Treasurer shall assist the City Manager in administering the affairs of the City efficiently and harmoniously. (iii) Section 2.08.140 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code charges the City Manager with the responsibility to keep the City Council fully advised of the financial condition and needs of the City at all times. (iv) Section 2.08.150 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires the City Manager to prepare and submit the proposed annual budget to the City Council for its approval. (v) Section 2.08.160 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires the City Manager to see that every City expenditure recommended to the City Council for the purchasing of supplies shall have been approved by the City Manager or his or her authorized representative. (vi) The specific functions and obligations of the City Treasurer are contained in over 100 state statutes as well as in this Municipal Code. (vii) It is the intent of this Council to adopt this Ordinance so that the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code succinctly delineates the basic functions and obligations of the City Treasurer in accordance with the above-referenced legislative provisions while ensuring that the City Treasurer works in partnership with the City Manager and the City Council to provide effective, efficient and timely governmental services. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it hereby is ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1. Section 2.08.280 hereby is added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "2.08.280. Functions and Obligations of the City Treasurer "A. The primary and core functions of the City Treasurer are to collect,maintain, invest and expend funds of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as prescribed in this Municipal Code and in accordance with the provisions of state legislation. In performing those functions, 1123 1-000 1\2436251 v Ldoc the City Treasurer is obligated to do so in accordance with the appropriate processing of proposed expenditures by the City Manager and his or her staff and in accordance with the decisions of the City Council made in adopting budgets and approving specific expenditures. "B. The City Treasurer position is not full time and does not include staffing, or an office, and access to the City's computer network is restricted to ensure network security. Accordingly, day-to-day activity of the City Treasurer is accomplished working in partnership with City staff, in particular the City Manager and Finance Director, as well as regular delegation of duties to the Deputy City Treasurer/Deputy City Manager while providing appropriate high-level review of the actions taken in support of the Treasury function by the abovementioned individuals. "C. The City Treasurer should be reasonably satisfied that all required processing procedures performed by the City Manager or his or her staff and any required approval of the City Council support the City Treasurer in turn processing and placing his or her required signature on City of Rancho Cucamonga checks and other forms of payment. The City Treasurer is not authorized to audit or attempt to modify decisions made by the City Manager or his or her staff or the City Council which support a City of Rancho Cucamonga expenditure of funds." Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the passage of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2020. L. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of August, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk -2- 11231-0001\243625Iv1.doc Ordinance No. 970 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEFINING THE FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY CLERK A. Recitals. (i) The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that it is the duty of the City Clerk to assist the City Manager in administering the affairs of the City efficiently, economically, and harmoniously. (ii) The specific functions and obligations of the City Clerk are contained in hundreds of state statutes as well as in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. (iii) It is the intent of this Council to adopt this Ordinance so that the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code succinctly delineates the basic functions and obligations of the City Clerk in accordance with the above-referenced legislative provisions. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it hereby is ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1. Section 2.08.290 hereby is added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "2.08.20. Functions and Obligations of the City Clerk. The City Clerk position is not full time, does not include a dedicated office or staff, and access to the City's computer network is restricted to ensure network security. Accordingly, day-to-day activity of the City Clerk is accomplished working in partnership with City staff, in particular the City Manager, as well as regular delegation of duties to the City Clerk Services Director while providing appropriate high-level review of the actions taken in support of the City Clerk function by the abovementioned individuals. The City Clerk Services Director shall be principally responsible for maintaining the City's records management system and carrying out those duties assigned to the City Clerk under this Code, unless a duty is otherwise required to be performed by the City Clerk under state law." Section 2. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause,phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason be held invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses,phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. 1123 1-000 1\2440927v2.doc PASSED, APPROVED,AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2020. L. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of August, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk -2- 11231-0001\2440927v2.doc August 19, 2020 Response to: Ordinance No. 970 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEFINING THE FUNCTONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY CLERK According to Government Code—Gov Tittle 4. Government of Cities [34000-45345] (Tittle 4 added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) Division 3. Officers (36501—41805] (Division 3 added by Stats. 1949. Ch. 79.) Part 1. General [36501-36525] (Part 1 added by Stats. 1949, Ch. 79.) When the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a General Law City, the founders and electors chose to have the City Treasurer and the City Clerk be elected positions with in the structure of our city government. What follows in 36501. Is what that structure is to be: 36501.The government of a general law city is vested in: (a) A City council of at least five members. (b) A City Clerk. (c) A City Treasurer. (d) A Chief of police. (e) A Fire Chief. (f) Any subordinate officers or employees provided by law. Your decision to change the status of the city treasurer(Ordinance 971)and city clerk as stated below in 36508. Must be submitted to the electors to decide! So if you want to change that status you may ask the electors to decide. Doesn't say you may make the change and decide for yourselves. Section 36509, tells you how you can ask the electors the question. 36508. At any municipal election, or a special election held for that purpose,the city council may submit to the electors the question whether the elective officers,or any of them except council members, shall be appointed by the city council; provided, however the city council shall not submit such question to the electors more often than one in an 11-month period. (Amended by stats. 2010, Ch. 699, Sec. 11. (SB 894 Effective January 1, 2011.) 36509. The question shall be printed on the ballots Used at the election substantially in one of the following forms: (a) "Shall the offices of city clerk and city treasurer be appointive?"; or (b) "Shall the office of city clerk be appointive?; or (c) "Shall the office of city treasurer be appointive?; The words "yes" "no" shall be so printed on the ballots that the voters may express their choice. (Amended by Stats. 1963, Ch. 509) To the question of having the city clerk report to the city manager would change the responsibilities of the office, elected or appointed from state mandated codes. Elected or appointed the city clerk's role spelled out by 40813., that the city clerk may appoint deputies, not the city manager and that the deputies hold office at the pleasure of the city clerk. The position of city clerk in the structure is given priority over the city manager,• as the city manager is not mentioned by code 26501.. 40813.The city clerk may appoint deputies,for whose acts the city clerk and the city clerk's bondspersons are responsible. The deputies shall hold office at the pleasure of the city clerk and receive the compensation as provided by the legislative body. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 467,Sec.45 (SB 1498) Effective January 1, 2019.) The city clerk is authorized to deputize city deputies not the city manager, it's the city clerk who deal with the courts, not the city manager. Acknowledgment of instrument are the city clerk's prevue not the city manager. 40814. The city clerk and the city clerk's deputies may administer oaths or affirmations and take and certify affidavits and depositions pertaining to city affairs and business which may be used in any court of proceedings in the state. The acknowledgment of an instrument may be made before a city clerk and the city clerk's deputies within the city in which they were elected or appointed. (Amended by stats. 2018, Ch. 467,Sec.46. (SB 1498) Effective January 1, 2019.) This Ordinance No. 970 flies in the face of state codes that give specific duties and responsibilities to the city clerk, not the city manager. The ordinance changes are unlawful and usurp the duties and responsibilities required by the state codes and the elector's wishes expressed at the beginning of our General Law City. No case has been made to the electors as to why this usurpation of powers given to the city clerk are warranted. We not did elect the city manager but, we did decide that electing treasurer and city clerk was important to us. NO ON RESOLUTION 970 is the only choice, because you must submit this change to the electors! Ordinance No. 971 AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEFINING THE FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY TREASURER Section 2.08.210 should read,Treasurer is elected and full responsibility, manager is hired! The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that the city manager(should be in his job description)shall assist the city treasurer in administering the affairs of the city efficiently and harmoniously. Section 2.08.140 should read,again city treasurer and city clerk, not the city manager. Regularly,at least once each month,the city treasurer shall submit to the city clerk a written report and accounting of all receipts, disbursements,and fund balances. The city treasurer shall file a copy with the legislative body. S^rtien 2 n4 'r*^ should not be here,only the duties of the city treasurer should be here. Place in the city manager job description. Section 2.08.160 should read,The city treasurer shall pay out money only on the warrants signed by the designation of city manager or his authorized representative approved by the city council. {va-) Why did you put this statement here,you're not following the codes(see above) (vii) This is supposed to be the city treasurers obligations,why are putting the city managers obligations in here? They should be in his job description A.41003. The city treasurer shall pay out the money only on warrants signed by legally designated persons.Then city council needs to designate the people in certain positions to have the authority to sign a warrant! The city treasurer is not a rubber stamp, he is in the position like the city clerk to oversee the people's treasury and records,nether are a rubber stamp! B.41006. 1)The city treasurer may appoint deputies. 2) City manager and finance director should have this in their job descriptions. 3) Deputy City Treasurer and Deputy City Clerk are under the city treasurer and city clerk. Deputy city manager answers to the city manager. Deputies like the city manager should all have this in the job descriptions as well! B.41007.The deputies shall hold office at the pleasure of the city treasurer and receive such compensation as is provided by the legislative body. C.40003. The city treasurer shall pay out the money only on warrants signed by legally designated persons. Designate who you want! Olt, i I DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Public hearing for Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 972 amending Section 17.36.020 to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed-use areas and Figure 17.38.060-15 to reflect the proposed change in the zoning designation along with ORDINANCE NO. 973 amending the zoning designation of 11.44 acres of land from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District to reflect the Mixed Use General Plan land use designation related to a proposed 131-unit multi-family development (ORDINANCE NO. 972 & ORDINANCE NO. 973.) RECOMMENDATION: • The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions trough adoption of the attached resolutions of approval with conditions; • Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for the project; • Approve Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992; and • Approve Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994. BACKGROUND: The project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at the June 24th Planning Commission meeting. That approval included Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148, Design Review DRC2018-00770, Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959. The Planning Commission also recommend City Council approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. ANALYSIS: The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. The project site is made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking, and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped. The developable portion of the project site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) District and is within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (Subarea 4). The dimensions of the generally triangular-shaped property are approximately 685 feet along the south property line, 1,077 feet along the east property line, 385 feet along the west property line, and 970 feet along the northwest property line. The site gently slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees. The project scope is for the development of a two and three-story mixed-use development made up of 131 residential units (73 one-bedroom and 58 two-bedroom units), 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one-bedroom residential units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space. The project density is 22.58 dwelling units per acre, below the maximum permitted density of 50 dwelling units Page 149 per acre. The project density calculation is based on the 3.76-acre area of the project site unencumbered by easements and the 1.98-acre Southern California Gas Company easement, to be used to fulfill the parking requirement for the project. The project is intended to be a rental community that they will own and operate. The commercial-ready lease areas are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential units. The 1,500-square foot commercial space is located within the single-story leasing office/recreation building, with the main entrance facing East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units will directly face East Avenue. Three- story residential buildings will also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the project site. Two-story carriage units will be located adjacent to the south property line and the Southern California Gas Company easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units will be single-floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space and pool, and spa will be located at the northeast corner of the site. One gated and one ungated vehicle access drive will be provided along East Avenue,with non-gated guest/customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The residential units will range in size from 676 to 789 square feet for the 1-bedroom units and 1,021 to 1,174 square feet for the 2-bedroom units. Recreational amenities include a pool and spa, BBQ facilities, clubhouse, fitness room, common open space areas, and multiple sports court areas (volleyball, badminton, bocce ball, horseshoes). A larger triangular-shaped common open space is located at the center of the project site and will include communal seating areas with water features and fire pits. The parking spaces and recreational amenities on the easement area will only be landscaped with shrubs and ground cover, as trees and other permanent structures are not permitted within the Southern California Gas Company easement area. The buildings will have a contemporary architectural design theme that includes the use of horizontal cement board siding, brick veneer, and stucco, along with cable railings and metal sunshades. The building materials are carried to all elevations (360-degree architecture) and each wall plane is well articulated. The private patios/decks range in size from 54 square feet to 100 square feet and each unit includes a minimum of 125 cubic feet of storage area in the garages as well as bicycle parking. A combination of block walls and wrought iron fencing is proposed around the project perimeter, with the main entrance from East Avenue located adjacent to the leasing office. The parking area and recreational amenities within the Southern California Gas Company's easement will not be fenced as structures are not permitted within the easement area. The project site is located adjacent to a Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD)water pumping station. The applicant and the adjacent property owner to the south are working with CVWD to incorporate noise attenuation measures that will reduce the noise levels of the water pumps. A Condition of Approval has been added requiring that the project complies with the related noise limitations and to work with CVWD to provide adequate access to their facility. The project complies with each of the Development Code requirements for the Mixed-Use (MU) Residential District. Projects within mixed-use districts are permitted an up to 75 percent reduction in the streetscape setbacks with no minimum building separation requirements (beyond that required by the Building Code). Project Entitlements: In addition to the Design Review DRC208-00770 the projects include the following entitlements: 1. Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 amends Chapters 17.36 and 17.38 of the Development Code related to the change in zoning of the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed-Use. The amendment will modify Development Code Section 17.36.020 (Development standards for mixed-use zoning districts) to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed-use area within the City. On June 15, 2016, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887, which similarly eliminated tables in General Plan which described the uses and development ranges permitted within each area designated for Mixed-Use development. The proposed changes will bring the Development Code into alignment with the General Plan and will provide more flexibility in the development of mixed-use zoning areas. The amendment will also modify Development Page 2 Page 150 Code Figure 17.38.060-1 (Foothill Boulevard Subareas) and Figure 17.38.060-15 (Subarea 4 Map) to reflect the proposed zone change. 2. Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed-Use (MU). The Zoning Map Amendment will bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan. 3. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148 is for the subdivision of the 11.44-acre project site to create one numbered and one lettered lot tentative tract map for condominium purposes. The numbered lot will include the residential/commercial portion of the project site and the lettered lot will include the existing utility easements (including a portion of the parking lot). 4. Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 is for the removal of 32 eucalyptus trees. It has been determined that 32 of the 33 on-site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to age, pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance, and other observed structural deficiencies (LSA — November 20, 2017). One mature eucalyptus tree will be preserved in place at the southwest corner of the project site. 5. Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 is to establish a Uniform Sign Program for the development. The sign program contains the location and conceptual design of all signs for the residential and commercial components of the project as well as project monumentation. Environmental Review: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. During the public comment period for the Initial Study, staff received comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) requesting changes in the timing and protocol for the preconstruction surveys for various species including the burrowing owl. The applicant's environmental consultant (LSA) has updated the IS and Mitigation Monitoring Plan with the updated language provided by CDFW. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.1, staff has determined that the updated mitigation measures will be equal or more effective in mitigating the project related biological impacts than the original mitigation measures. Staff received a letter dated June 24, 2020 (Debra Kinsinger), raising concerns related to the biological study and mitigation measures provided by the applicant's consultant (LSA). The letter states that when Ms. Kinsinger performed a biological survey for the parcel to the south in 2017, she observed burrowing owls on the project site. She requested that the Planning Commission require that the applicant confer with CDFW prior to certification of the Initial Study. The applicant's environmental consultant (LSA) provided a letter responding to the comments received from Ms. Kinsinger, which outlines that the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW included in the IS and MMP address the concerns raised related to the potential loss of burrowing owl habitat. The Planning Commission agreed with the applicant's consultant (LSA), that the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW addresses Ms. Kinsinger's concerns and recommended City Council approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration as presented. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact Analysis (RSG) prepared for the project determined that the project would provide a net annual recurring impact of $71,591 to the City in the year 2024. New recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one- time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, Page 3 Page 151 parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills the City Councils' goal of enhancing the City's position as a premier community in our region. The proposed mixed-use development on a vacant parcel of land will provide much-needed housing as well as commercial uses to serve the local community. The project is also consistent with General Plan Goal LU-2, for the development of attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods and is accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and automobiles. The proposed infill development will complement the approved mixed-use development to the south as well as the mix of multi-family and single-family development in the surrounding area. The project site is located within 1/3- mile walking distance of two public parks and is conveniently accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, automobiles and is within walking distance of an active Omnitrans bus line. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment— 1 PC Staff Report with Exhibits dated June 24, 2020 Attachment— 2 PC Minutes dated June 24, 2020 Attachment— 3 DRC2018-00992 Ordinance First Reading Attachment—4 DRC2018-00994 Ordinance First Reading Page 4 Page 152 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �l STAFF REPORT DATE: June 24, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20148, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00770, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019- 00867 AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2019-00959 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP —A request for site plan and architectural review of a mixed-use development with 131 residential units, 4 commercial ready units, and a 1,500-square foot commercial space that includes a tentative tract map for condominium purposes, a request to amend the text and figures related to mixed-use development in the Development Code, a Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning from Community Commercial (CC)to Mixed-Use (MU), a Tree removal permit to remove 32 trees and a Uniform Sign Program for onsite signage on an 11.44-acre project site in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard —APN: 1100-191-04. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148, Design Review DRC2018-00770, Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. • Recommend City Council approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: The project was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a Pre-Application Workshop on October 11, 2017 (DRC2017-00674). Staff was in support of the project but recommended that the architecture be enhanced by selecting a recognizable architectural design theme. The Planning Commissioners were overall supportive of the project and agreed with staff that a more specific Page153 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 2 architectural style should be considered and that the project could be more contemporary similar to the project to the south. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. The project site is made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking, and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped. The developable portion of the project site is zoned Community Commercial (CC) District and is within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District(Subarea 4). The dimensions of the generally triangular-shaped property are approximately 685 feet along the south property line, 1,077 feet along the east property line, 385 feet along the west property line, and 970 feet along the northwest property line. The site gently slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Site Vacant Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Mixed-Use Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed-Use Mixed-Use (MU) District East Single-Family City of Fontana City of Fontana Residences Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District ANALYSIS: A. General: The project scope is for the development of a two and three-story mixed-use development made up of 131 residential units (73 one-bedroom and 58 two-bedroom units), 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one-bedroom residential units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space. The project density calculation is based on the 3.76-acre area of the project site unencumbered by easements and the 1.98-acre Southern California Gas Company easement, to be used to fulfill the parking requirement for the project. The maximum permitted density in the Mixed-Use (MU) District is 50 dwelling units per acre. B. Parking: The project is required to provide 281 parking spaces, 131 of which are required to be provided in the form of a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial and commercial ready units. The 1,500 square foot commercial space and the commercial ready units were parked at the office/retail parking rate (1/250 gross square foot). The project Page 154 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 3 is required to provide 1 garage/carport parking space for each 1 and 2-bedroom unit, or 131 spaces based on the proposed unit breakdown. The project provides 134 garage parking spaces. One hundred forty-three (143) of the required parking spaces are located on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking within the easement area. The applicant also proposes permitting street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed-use project to the south. This will net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial ready tenant spaces. The street parking spaces are not counted in the parking analysis below as they are not on the project site. C. Project Entitlements: In addition to the Design Review DRC208-00770 the projects include the following entitlements: 1. Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 amends Chapters 17.36 and 17.38 of the Development Code related to the change in zoning of the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed-Use. The amendment will modify Development Code Section 17.36.020 (Development standards for mixed-use zoning districts) to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed-use area within the City. On June 15, 2016, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887, which similarly eliminated tables in General Plan which described the uses and development ranges permitted within each area designated for Mixed-Use development. The proposed changes will bring the Development Code into alignment with the General Plan and will provide more flexibility in the development of mixed-use zoning areas. The amendment will also modify Development Code Figure 17.38.060-1 (Foothill Boulevard Subareas) and Figure 17.38.060-15 (Subarea 4 Map) to reflect the proposed zone change. 2. Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed-Use (MU). The Zoning Map Amendment will bring the project site into conformance with the General Plan. 3. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148 is for the subdivision of the 11.44-acre project site to create one numbered and one lettered lot tentative tract map for condominium purposes. The numbered lot will include the residential/commercial portion of the project site and the lettered lot will include the existing utility easements (including a portion of the parking lot). 4. Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 is for the removal of 32 eucalyptus trees. It has been determined that 32 of the 33 on-site eucalyptus trees are in poor condition due to age, pest infestation, lack of care and maintenance, and other observed structural deficiencies (LSA— November 20, 2017). One mature eucalyptus tree will be preserved in place at the southwest corner of the project site. Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 is to establish a Uniform Sign Program for the development. The sign program contains the location and conceptual design of all signs for the residential and commercial components of the project as well as project monumentation. Page 155 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 4 The project is intended to be a rental community that they will own and operate. The commercial-ready lease areas are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential units. The 1,500-square foot commercial space is located within the single-story leasing office/recreation building, with the main entrance facing East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units will directly face East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings will also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the project site. Two-story carriage units will be located adjacent to the south property line and the Southern California Gas Company easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units will be single-floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space and pool, and spa will be located at the northeast corner of the site. One gated and one ungated vehicle access drive will be provided along East Avenue, with non-gated guest/customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The residential units will range in size from 676 to 789 square feet for the 1-bedroom units and 1,021 to 1,174 square feet for the 2-bedroom units. Recreational amenities include a pool and spa, BBQ facilities, clubhouse, fitness room, common open space areas, and multiple sports court areas (volleyball, badminton, bocce ball, horseshoes). A larger triangular-shaped common open space is located at the center of the project site and will include communal seating areas with water features and fire pits. The parking spaces and recreational amenities on the easement area will only be landscaped with shrubs and ground cover, as trees and other permanent structures are not permitted within the Southern California Gas Company easement area. The buildings will have a contemporary architectural design theme that includes the use of horizontal cement board siding, brick veneer, and stucco, along with cable railings and metal sunshades. The building materials are carried to all elevations (360-degree architecture)and each wall plane is well articulated. The private patios/decks range in size from 54 square feet to 100 square feet and each unit includes a minimum of 125 cubic feet of storage area in the garages as well as bicycle parking. A combination of block walls and wrought iron fencing is proposed around the project perimeter, with the main entrance from East Avenue located adjacent to the leasing office. The parking area and recreational amenities within the Southern California Gas Company's easement will not be fenced as structures are not permitted within the easement area. The project site is located adjacent to a Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) water pumping station. The applicant and the adjacent property owner to the south are working with CVWD to incorporate noise attenuation measures that will reduce the noise levels of the water pumps. A Condition of Approval has been added requiring that the project complies with the related noise limitations and to work with CVWD to provide adequate access to their facility. The project complies with each of the Development Code requirements for the Mixed-Use (MU) Residential District. Projects within mixed-use districts are permitted an up to 75 percent reduction in the streetscape setbacks with no minimum building separation requirements (beyond that required by the Building Code). Page 156 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 5 Minimum/ Maximum Proposed Compliant? Requirement Building Setback East Avenue 35 feet* 11 feet-9 Inches Yes Building Setback Side Property 5 Feet 5 Feet Yes Line Height Limit 75 Feet 39 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 26 Percent Yes Open Space Per Unit 150 Square Feet 364 Square Feet Yes Density 50 Units per Acre 22.58 Units per Yes Acre *Mixed-Use Projects are Permitted an Up To 75 Percent Reduction Parking Analysis Number Square Required of Units Footage Parking Ratio Parking Multi-family units (one 73 N/A 1.5 per unit, 1 in garage or 110 bedroom) carport Multi-family units (two 58 N/A 2 per unit, 1 in garage or bedrooms) carport 116 Visitor parking (multi-family) 131 N/A 1 per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office N/A 1,500 1 per 250 square feet 6 Commercial Ready N/A 1,220 1 per 250 square feet 5 Total Parking Spaces Required 281 Total Parking Spaces Provided 285 Total Parking Spaces on Easement 143 Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 134/131 Parking Surplus 4 D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Guglielmo, Williams, and Smith) on February 4, 2020. The Committee raised the following questions related to the project: 1. Whether a vehicle left turn lane will be included into the project and whether the on-street parking was parallel or perpendicular to the curb face; (Staff Response) The street parking spaces will be parallel to the sidewalk. 2. Whether a bike lane is proposed along the west side of East Avenue; (Staff Response) The applicant has provided an illustration that is included in the attached set of plans showing the East Avenue street alignment with a bicycle lane and center median left-turn lane into the project. Page 157 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 6 3. Whether the project provided a tot lot; (Staff Response) The project does not include a tot lot but is within 1/3-mile walking distance of two public parks. 4. Whether there will be trail access to Garcia Park, which is adjacent to the project site. (Staff Response) There is a planned community trail adjacent to the project site, though the project will not be required to install these improvements as trail is not on the project site. The Committee had no significant concerns with the design and the overall project. The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. E. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant originally scheduled a neighborhood meeting for March 26, 2020. The meeting was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A second public notice letter was sent to all property owners within 660 feet of the project site requesting that any comments related to the project be forwarded to the project planner. To date, no comments have been received. F. Public Art: Development Code Section 17.124.020 (Public Art Required) requires that residential developments with 4 or more dwelling units provide public art with a minimum value of $750 per unit and/or $1 per square foot of commercial lease area or pay an in-lieu fee into the City's public art trust fund, equal to the minimum value of the artwork that would other be included in the development project. G. SB18 and AB52 Tribal Consultation: In accordance with SB18, notification was sent on July 2, 2019, to tribal communities from a list of seven tribes provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians)and requested any cultural studies that were prepared for the studies. The studies were forwarded to the two tribes and no further comment was received. Notification in accordance with AB52 was sent on December 16, 2019, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the City. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation). The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested in writing that language be incorporated into the final CEQA document requiring notification if cultural resources are found. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation requested that mitigation measures be included in the CEQA documents requiring an on-site tribal monitor during earthmoving actives. The CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQX) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by LSA and was peer-reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Hazardous and Waste Materials, Noise, Transportation and Traffic and Tribal Cultural Resources, there would be no substantial Page 158 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 7 evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential impacts to migratory birds, cultural and Tribal cultural resources, and reduce noise impacts during the project's construction, as well as potential impacts that may be created upon operation of the development, such as traffic-related impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact Analysis (RSG) prepared for the project determined that the project would provide a net annual recurring impact of $71,591 to the City in the year 2024. New recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills the City Councils' goal of enhancing the City's position as a premier community in our region. The proposed mixed-use development on a vacant parcel of land will provide much- needed housing as well as commercial uses to serve the local community. The project is also consistent with General Plan Goal LU-2, for the development of attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods and is accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and automobiles. The proposed infill development will complement the approved mixed-use development to the south as well as the mix of multi-family and single-family development in the surrounding area. The project site is located within 1/3-mile walking distance of two public parks and is conveniently accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, automobiles and is within walking distance of an active Omnitrans bus line. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Attachments: Exhibit A- Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Pre-Application Staff Report and Minutes (Dated October 11, 2017) Exhibit C - Design Review Comments and Meeting Minutes (Dated February 4, 2020) Exhibit D - Initial Study with Mitigation Monitoring Plan Page 159 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP June 24, 2020 Page 8 Draft Resolution #20-29 Recommending Approval of Development Code DRC2018-00992 Draft Resolution #20-30 Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 Draft Resolution #20-31 of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 Draft Resolution #20-32 of Approval for Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 Draft Resolution #20-33 of Approval for Development Review DRC2018-00770 Draft Resolution #20-34 of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148 Page 160 M WESTBURY =r RANCHO CUCAMONGA , CALIFORNIA SHEET INDEX SHEET # ARCHITECTURAL SHEET TITLE CS.1 COVER SHEET A.0 RENDERING VIEWS A.1 PRELIMIARY SITE PLAN A.1.1 OPEN SPACE PLAN A.2 CONCEPTUAL FIRE ACCESS SITE PLAN A.3 TABULATION & SUMMARY - A.4 BUILDING 1 TYPE I FLOOR PLANS A.5 BUILDING 1 TYPE I FLOOR PLANS A.6 BUILDING 1 TYPE I ELEVATIONS A.7 BUILDING 2, 3 & 4 TYPE 11 FIRST FLOOR PLAN , j A.8 BUILDING 2 OR 3 TYPE II ELEVATIONS A.9 BUILDING 4 TYPE 11 ELEVATIONS A.10 BUILDING 5A & 513 TYPE III FLOOR PLAN A.11 BUILDING 5A & 5B TYPE III FLOOR PLAN A.12 BUILDING 5A & 513 TYPE III ROOF PLAN A.13 BUILDING 5A & 513 TYPE III ELEVATIONS A.14 BUILDING 5A & 513 TYPE III ELEVATIONS A.15 BUILDING TYPE IV&V FLOOR PLANS A.16 BUILDING 6 TYPE IV ELEVATIONS ^ �� A.16.1 BUILDING 7 TYPE V ELEVATIONS V � A.17 CLUB HOUSE & FITNESS FLOOR& ROOF PLAN , A.18 CLUB HOUSE ELEVATIONS A.19 FITNESS AT PLANSEVATIONS A.20 UN • -~ s , , :� ,f A.21 PARKING AND TRASH ENCLOSURE � A.22 COLOR & MATERIALS SCHEME A �� y'T A.23 COLOR & MATERIALS SCHEME B SHEET # LANDSCAPE 76 L-1 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT L-2 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT -RJR L-3 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT L-4 LANDSCAPE AMENITIES 7. L-5 LANDSCAPE AMENITIES L-6 LANDSCAPE AMENITIES ki ... ,.. y - fr "�. 1E aa7 SHEET # ELECTRICAL awr .• n n E1.2 SITE LIGHTING PLAN SHEET # CIVIL SU-01 SITE UTILIZATION S U-02 SITE UTILIZATION VICINITY MAP TTM-01 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: TFM-02 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Pff&,. TTM-03 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONTACT: BRANDON ROTH scha-a'� $ylManeK�� CG-01 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS STRATHAM HOMES Via Veneto Dr CG-02 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS K Riewq ` CortezCt CG-03 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS 2201 DUPONT DRIVE, SUITE 300 Q CG-04 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS IRVINE, CA 92612 CG-05 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS e `` CG-06 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS - DETAILS 4 PHONE: (949) 833-1554 Garcia$d Garcin PWQMP-01 PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY PLAN CF-01 CUT FILL MAP EMAIL: broth@strathome.com M4` CF-02 CUT FILL MAP L13 FA-01 FIRE ACCESS PLAN EAST A❑EFSTRIPING PLAN EAST A❑E❑STRIPING ELE-iATION aorrrcm ARCHITECTS : CIVIL ENGINEER: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS : foothill elad W Foothill Blvd CONTACT: SERAFIN MERANAN CONTACT: RON MAESTAS CONTACT: MICHAEL SALAZAR ARCHITECTS ORANGE MADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. KORIANDER DESIGN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230 PHONE: (909) 353-4005 ORANGE, CA 92866 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 EMAIL: msalazar@kdlainc.com PHONE: (714) 639-9860 PHONE: (909) 481 6322 EXT 123 EMAIL: serafinm@Architectorange.com EMAIL: rmaestas@madoleinc.com CS01 COVER WESTBURY SHEET DATE: 01 -15 - 2020 ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.. 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange (949) 883- 1554 ( 714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 These plans are copyright protected.Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. 1 `M. m IA k +� IF mil' � c - W '� - _ - -�a 'P -- � - �.. r�L` �• �R� `•�� y' v",y,,�i�.�' t I SE AP W. � yP r .�� r � � :raw. �i �,. r..i� •-�. � � �- ti+r,_ -• r � -Jam' .(' 4 V k�,,klill fl Ar - y - 71 JrF AM mill on; 0 1 5 . y.9 f•� .0�. V M� -. ` ° r� ��'-,..f� �. � ..i • iY ••� 1,jam' � r �.,.;: �'tx' � ��' V Ir �I�iMl�a+tilw s rt i' R J <E: ■1 ■ ` ■■1111■111 • ■■■■ ■■mnlll■■■Mimi nl■. ■■■��■■■■■■nill.■ ■■■■ ■111■■■■Milli■■■■■ ■■ ■.■■■. ■ ■■■. ■11111■■■ ■ 111111■■ ■■ ■111■111■ ■■ ■■1111■■■I■ 0 ■■■■■ E IS BUILDING/UNIT MIX TRANSMISSI T.� ^� p� OWER BLDG. 1 BDRM 2 BDRM U �+ r DEST. TYPE QTY. Al A2 A3 A4 B1 g2 g2* B3 TOTAL UNITS GARAGE EuISON TRANSMISSION 1 I 1 6 6 0 0 7 3 0 1 22 14 \\ POLE 2 II 1 6 6 0 0 2 4 2 0 20 11 3 II 1 6 6 0 0 2 4 2 0 20 11 ,4,i 4 11 1 6 6 0 0 2 6 0 20 11 5A III 1 11 0 0 0 6 0 0 17 13 302\ 2 5B 111 1 3 0 0 3 11 0 0 17 14 9 6 IV 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 56 \ 7 V 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 SUB-TOTAL - - 38 24 8 3 30 17 4 7 �`•�\ ��, TOTALS - 14 73 58 131 134 57 O of o % - - 55.7% 44.3% 100% \ ��\• \ �\� *COMMERCIAL READY PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED M INT. RESIDENTIAL PARKIN REQUIRED OPEN SPACE(9'X1 ') CITY CITY CITY UNITTYPE QUANTITY REQUIRED PARKING CITY REQUIRED STALLS REQUIRED F \ \ PER UNIT ACTOR/PERCENTAG E❑ISON BLDG? r/ r \ ` 1 1 TRANSMISSION 1 BEDROOM 73 1.5 NA 110 TYPE V j'! O® \� POLE 2 BEDROOMS 58 2 NA 116 010� 1 1 �V /\ TOTAL UNITS 131 \� \ STALL REQUI RED-RESIDENTIAL 226 ® I BLDG 6 \- ` STALL REQUIRED-GUEST/3 UNITS 131 0.335 44 TYPE/V A �O L9� _ 8 \� 13 0 USPS 1 w 9 N`� \V BLDG 6 \ A RETAI L 1500/250 6 I i/ ® � dOd I% a 13 / COMMERICAL READY 1220/250 5 TYPE/VEJEJ ��o �,� '� TOTAL STALL REQU IRE D 282 � � EVCS INCLUDED IN PARKING COUNT 4.106.4.2 FOR RESIDENTS 226 0.03 7 BLDG 6 / \ ,> -Z,` OPQ-\ EVCS INCLUDED IN PARKING COUNT 4.106.4.2 FOR GUESTS 44 1 0.03 2 TYPE/V ® �\,\ \ �� \ TOTAL EVCS INCLUDED IN PARKING COUNT 4.106.4.2 9 IV ® BLDG4 ® 0 ? �� 5�� . E-1SON o� TYPE ��S \ QAQ� ��RANSMISS ON '9j F� 13 OQ' �\POLE PARKING SUMMARYO D D \ Q vnNHc. ��' � ;� ,'. , RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIRED OPEN SPACE(9'X 19') w cY? o \ BLDG 6 �,,� COVERED OPEN '\ � ��p TYPE OF PARKING QUANTITY TOTAL BLDG 6 ,- --- � ,, '' (J� TYPE/V �. PARKING STALLS �. Q � ® �'� •(� GARAGES 134 TYPE/V 134 134 OPEN STALLS 101 95 95 13 o \ a� w I J 3 [9„ m '�f- O "a��. ® may •(� \\, \ \ STALL PROVIDED-GUEST 0 44 44 BLDG'.. oQ ;' \ SA �� a �\ OTA :143 PARKING STALLS TOTAL COMMERCIAL STALLS 6 6 '9� `� ��t`5 ON EASEMENT 13 � O� T L \ Lo TYPE/// --- --- � � ;� BLDG �\ � TOTAL COMMERCIAL READY STALL 5 5 Y Cfl Q TYPE/ �7O BLDG 6 P�Q)�,\� W T j TYPE/V G�Q �� \\ STALL FOR USPS 1 1 n, '9� �Q g' 134 151 285 ` �� Q� TOTAL STALL PROVIDED PARKING RATIO 2.18 BLDG 6 \ 13 TYPE/V _ �� ® � \ \\ EVCS INCLUDED IN PARKING COUNT 4.106.4.2 9 t 8 Lb _ tv -l - �' . 9� uses ,i' � \ IIA O``F` `� \ RESIDENTIALASSIGNED PARKING y --- BLDG 5B o -<I �•. \ * 1 43 PARKING SPACES ARE LOCATED WITHIN EASEMENT w �� - TYPE * PROVIDED GUEST PARKING: 1 GUEST FOR EVERY 3 UNITS ao � _ �I ROLLED CURB ® 0 O ;-' * STREET PARKING NOT INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING (19 PARALLEL PARKING SPACES) Evcs 10,J)" ® \ BICYCLE PARKING RELIUIRELI AT 5u OF uuuPARKING = 14 BICYCLE SPACES - -- `• �'�" �► " � � � � BICYCLE PARKING PRO❑I❑E❑ OUT❑OOR BIKE RACKS FOR 10 BIKES ❑ *4 0 \ ❑0 BICYCLE PARKING INSI❑E GARAGES ❑EE SHEET A3 FOR LOCATIONS AND ❑ETAILS M ❑ GAtE - \ \\�•\ --- -- --- ---- ---- --- -- GATE $'�' 131A1 Al Al ❑ 131 ® 9' i_ E� — IV ---- 4- — — - - --- CALL-------------------------------- BLDG 3 BLDG 2 t _ I BD o ®®® a,\ TYPE// ] a TYPE// I LO'LY „t ,E®�® UT❑OOR BIKE RACKS TOTAL 10 BIKES B2 _. A2 A2 __ B2 B2 B2 �10 i IzV zV BLDG SETBACK _ --1 - -- -- - --- --- —��------- ----------- -- ----------------------------- ------ - - -- --- - -------- - - ------------ --- -- ---- ---- --- --- - - ---- ---- ---- --- — I -- � ------------------ ------------ ------- -- --- --- - - - - "' PROP.RW CURB FACE — — — ' II - = CURB FACE i EXIST.RW � COMMERCIAL AREA 11500 S ❑ FT❑ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------= �? -------- ----- - i 1� -------------------- -------- - -------- - TO BE LINE UP WITH, a I 1 MARSHALL COURT i ., 1�- «• j 2 EAST. E�� i COMMERCIAL READY 305 S ❑ FT�I UNIT TOTAL: 305 S ❑ FT❑❑ 4 U N ITS = 1 ❑❑0 S ❑ FT❑ All SCALE: 1 :40 C 1 CO" WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: 12-02-2019 CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN JOB NO.: 2016-371 ro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 ❑01❑Arm®®Or❑❑❑❑ (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 0®0®®000n m od° ono® ❑r®❑ 111111®0®❑1111 Ar00®0®Or0000❑ 385.14' PL ol!„(V DIM. (D 7, `` L EG E N D o 0 AT GRADE 00 o 0 � . OPEN SPACE 0 7 1 M INT. `�� \ INTERIOR OPEN SPACE ------------- BLDG 7 TYPE V 03o� BLDG 6 i \TYPEIV • L9,>, 0 BLDG 6 TYPEIV O BLDG 6 L9 G TYPEIV �� O� � 9 �"� ,�� `� 13 t�P 5P \ 0." BLDG 4 ® � A ,b `\ ��.��, O T YPE// \, ',/10 5Wl 17 'P \\\IS,) VAN HC PRIVATE OPEN SPACE BLDG 6 olp TYPEIV BLDG 6 00 TYPEIV < UNIT QTY PRI VA TE TOTAL y OO % SQ.FT. SQ. FT. Al 38 54 2,052 25% > CA) A2 24 60 1,440 18% 3 11 L9" A3 8 63 504 6% 0— o< O TOTAL143 PARKING STALLS A4 3 100 300 4% BLDG 5A 7 c ON EASEMENT 1131 30 56 1,680 21% L0 ® � 19,130 SQ.FT. TyloE v B2 11 16 1,292 1 bm/0 - tfLL/C7 7 I':*- m Lb " BLDG 6 B2* 4 12 484 6% cn TYPE/< C iV B3 7 63 441 5% TYPEIV < SUB-TOTAL 131 8,193 100% *COMMERCIAL READY BLDG 6 T)IPEIV I Li usps tv OPEN SPACE PROVIDED so 0 > i BLDG olbr ------------- < < SQ. FT % OF NET AREA SQFTIUNIT AC Ov TYPE ---- ----- --- 06" COMMON USABLE OPEN SPACE 39,467 301 0.91 0 m 9 181 1 1,a I,a EVCS ROLLED CURB PRI 10.V OPEN SPACE 8,193 63 0.19 VA TOTAL 1 47,660 19% 1 364 1.09 ----------- cl) co GATE 9,854 SQ.FT. \\ \ 8' 0' Ev ` Bl -Al Al Al iv ------ BI --- ----------------------- 1-4 ------------- ----- 4V 2 BLDG BLDG 3 ----- CALL F TYPE 0,4830F TY,,cFll 130 ho. ?8 s6JE4 El B2B2 B2 I LIL7 @) T A2 A2 Zv F-niFn,, Lo BLDG.SETBACK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---—---- ----- ------ --------------------------------------- ---------- -----I--- ------ I ---------- PROP.RW -- \--CURB FACE--' ACE EXIST.RW fl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-----9------- ----------9-------17�------- -- --------------------------- -------- -- -- ---- ---------- Ir- 1 BE LINE UP WITH,lo ;t It Lo -K MARSHALL COURT ------------------------- -------------------------------------------- ---------------------- ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ -------- ---------------- A 1111 SCALE: 1 :40 E I C0 DATE: 12-02-2019 WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA OPEN SPACE PLAN JOB NO.: 2016-371 ro u STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 D01EiArEE1==OrE1E17F1 (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 TOL L0D=mmLd ioDdLnTMLELIiL:Li] l 11rFFM11 111111 EE]EIIIIE]1111 Arl]EIFIMIIELI Or[][][][][] Jbb.14' F'L 2 O ' O Oo MAINT. 'BLDG 7 T/ > \ , \ TYPE <V v 9 , r BLDG 6 \\\�\ \ I � ,o BLDG 6/V 01 I ,\ \ PE B 13 v� � w J BLDG 6PO�j \ v O 516.0 T /V O BLDG 4 ,/lv A�� \� 'c v '9 TYPE// 13 �� 84.0 264.0 q q BLDG 6 BLDG 6 TYPE/V \\ &, �� ` Aerial Fire Truck YPE/V inches Width 102.0 \`1O \\ `, Track : 102.0 _ 13 ��7 O \ \ \ Lock to Lock Time � 6,0 m '' ® ` ' \ �\ , \\ Steering Angle 33.3 °Q to � � \�\� < � TOTAL:143 PARKING STALLS BLDG 5A �� V A 13 `v v `97 5�p ON EASEMENT LO „,.. ` \ TYPE mF q�® P TYPE/ � BLOG \�,9��V PC' ® I� YPE/V FIRE ACCESS L EGEW7 lull ONS LDG 6 13 gp� Q \ m YPE/V �5 7 i „ _ a q, USPs 68 I,V vV i o y BLDG5B TYPICAL APPARATUS _ _ _ =o=a ` TURNING RAL7IUS - �� `, �0O v ROLLED CURB I 1 I EVCS 1U� ® p� A / v v -- — — — -- -- -- — — — — -- \ O 40-6 GATE 150'FIRE HOSE -- - -- - - --- -- -- - -- - OO . ■� LENGTH $'�' B1 Al Al Al B1 E� IV 11w — BLDG 3 BLDG 2 CAL v� 7BO COD g- CLEAR FIRE LANE/ a rYPErr T rYPE/r ®O56�® \ N FIRE ACCESS B2 A2 A2 B2 B2 B2 10� 19' o®o �,7 - ZV IV �.�„ BLDG.SETBACK U � TYPE/ BUILDING TYPE '- - - -- PROP.RW `\ CURB FACE - = ♦ = CURB FACE \ ! ♦ ♦ I ♦ EXIST.RW Q --------------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ; — — —�- �— — — % — — — — fl _ BLDG% 712 BUILDING NUMBER Ln � 0 , LO TO BE LINE UP WITH i %% i �0 �� MARSHALLCOURT; �/E I��E' Row ---' --+ - - EAST--A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SETBACKLINE NORTH ---__—_----__________—_—_—_-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------___ -------------- r SCALE: 1 E40 ❑ 1 HD li l CONCEPTUAL FIRE DATE: 08-13-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA ACCESS SITE PLAN JOB NO.: 2016-371 ro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c i❑o 1❑Arm®®Or❑❑❑❑ (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 0®0®®000��o�Ur° °moo® ❑r®❑ ❑Or❑®0®❑❑❑Ar00®0®Of0000❑ ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBLE UNITS TOTAL BUILDING GROSS SQFT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION COVERED DWELLING UNITS GARAGES UNITS BLDG.DEST. TYPE QTY. STAIR C ORI D UTILITY 1ST FL SQFT. 2ND FL SQFT. 3RD FL DATA TOT GROUND FLOOR PROVIDE PARCEL APN 1100-191-04 11.44 AC BUILDING 1/TYPE 1 4 14 1 1 1 1,702 0 116 8,609 8,701 8, 1144 BUILDING 2&3/TYPE 11 8 22 2,3&4 II 3 3,588 0 348 22,641 22,848 2211 BUI LDI N G 4/TYPE 11 4 11 5A&5B III 2 2,392 378 174 13,708 13,969 13,! TOTAL GROSS SITE AREA: 11.44 6 IV 7 0 14,448 14,455 14,1 BUILDING 5TYPE III 6 27 7 V 1 0 158 8,609 8,701 8,/ TOTAL 22 74 FITNESS/MAIL RM. 1 1,863 PROJECT SUMMARY LEASING/ PARKING FOR 22 COVERED DWELLING UNITS TOTAL TYPE FACTOR STALLS CLUB/RETAIL 1 4,414 PERCENTAGE REQUIRED DATA EXISTING ZONING OF SITE: COMMUNITY/COM GARAGE 22 22 0.02 1 SUB-TOTAL 16 7,682 796 74,292 68,674 68,1 PROPOSED ZONING OF SITE: MIXED USE TOTAL LOT SIZE GROSS AREA 11.44 OPEN STALLS 22 22 0.02 1 EASEMENT/DEDICATION 5.70 TOTAL 2 TOTAL LOT SIZE NET AREA 5.74 NOTE:TOTAL COVERED DWELLING UNITS=22 X 2 STALL/UNIT=44 STALLS REQUIRED ROAD &PARKING AREA: 1.84 ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED FOR 22 COVERED DWELLING UNITS REQUIRED FACTOR ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROPOSED TOTAL#OF DWELLING UNITS: 131 PARKING PERCENTAGE REQUIRED PROPOSED DENSITY OF UNITS/GROSS 11.5 PROPOSED DENSITY OF UNITS/NET 22.8 REQUIRED ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS PER 1109A.4 44 STALLS 0.02 1 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE GUEST REQUIRED PARKING STALLS PER 1109A.5 44 STALLS 0.05 2 EVCS 4.106.4.2.2 FOR RESIDENTIAL 7 STALLS 0.04 1 SITE COVERAGE DATA EVCS 4.106.4.2.2 FOR GUEST 2 STALLS 0.04 1 PRIVATE UNIT QTy TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL 6 STALLS 0.04 1 SQFT. SQ. FT. SQ.FT Al 38 54 2,052 25% TOTALACCESSIBLE STALL REQUIRED( INCLUDED IN PARKING COUNT) 6 A2 24 60 1,440 18% BUILDING COVERAGE 87,729 RESIDENTIAL ASSIGNED PARKING A3 8 63 504 6% ROAD&PARKING COVERAGE 79,942 A4 3 100 300 4% OPEN/LANDSCAPE HANDSCAPE COVER. 17,383 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED . . FOR ACCESSIBLE UNITS 131 30 56 1,680 21 OPEN/LANDSCAPE SOFTSCAPE COVER. 64,980 B2 17 76 1,292 16% STANDARD VAN (1/8) B2* 4 121 484 6% SUB-TOTAL 250,034 HC RESIDENT-GARAGES 1 1 B3 7 63 441 5% HC RESIDENTIAL OPEN STALLS 1 1 SUB-TOTAL 131 - 8,193 100% *COMMERCIAL READY NET LEASABLE UNIT SQFT. HC GUEST OPEN STALLS 2 1 1 HC EVCS FOR RESIDENTS 1 1 CLASSIFICATIONS UNIT UNIT LSF QTY % TOTAL LEASABLE SF HC EVCS FOR GUEST 1 1 1BR/1BA Al 753 38 29% 28,614 HC FOR COMMERCIAL 1 1 BLDG TYPE OF 1BR/1BA A2 739 24 18% 17,736 TOTAL ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROVIDED(INCLUDED IN PARKING COUNT) 7 1 6 TYPE QTY OCCUPANCY CONSTRUCTION 1BR/1BA A3 789 8 6% 6,312 SPRINKLED 1BR/1BA A4 676 3 2% 2,028 I 1 R2 VA 21311/213A B1 1,021 30 23% 30,630 II 3 R2 VA 21311/213A B2 1,077 17 13% 18,309 III 2 R2 VA 21311/213A 62* 1,077 4 pr 3% 4,308 STRATHAM BIKES IV 7 R2 VA 21311/213A B3 1,174 7 5% 8,218 STORAGE STUDY V 1 R2 VA TOTAL 7,306 131 100% 116,155 TOTAL GARAGES 60 *THIS UNITTOTAL 1077 LSF INCLUDED 305 SQFT COMMERCIAL READY 60AVAILABLEBICYCLESPACES FITNESS/ MAILRM 1 A3-B SEPERATED VA 12-IN BUILDING TYPE 1 27-INBUI LID NG TYPE 2 CLUB/LEAS'G & 21-IN BUILDING TYPE 3 1 A3-13 S E P E RATED VA RETAIL 25'-8" 1'-11/4" 24'-63/4" TOTAL 16 - - BIKE SPACE CONFLICTS WITH DOOR ACCESS REQUIREMENT OPEN SPACE PROVIDED - II PURPLE AREA INDICATE SQ. FT % OF NET AREA SQFT/UNIT AC CODE SUMMARY 10'X 20'CLEAR FOR u15i GARAGE BIKE COMMON USABLE OPEN SPACE 39,467 301 0.91 11 STORAGE - PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 8,193 63 0.19 CODE ADOPTED EDITION 11 3' TOTAL 47,660 19% 364 1.09 BUILDING CODE 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 4 _ 125CUFf FIRE CODE 2016CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BIKE ENERGYCODE 2016 BUILDING EFFICIENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIALAND NON RESIDENTIAL II a iouuumum PURPLE AREA INDICATE MECHANICAL CODE 2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE l 10'X 20'CLEAR FOR E 5 II GARAGE E I I - PLUMBINGDE 2016 PLUMBING CODE � us, GARAGE5ELECTRICAL CODE 2016 CALIFORNIACALI FORNIA CODE II 23 3, 4„ 14 POOL CODE 2012 UNIFORM SWIMMING POOLCODE STORAGE MUNICIPAL CODE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE 125 IT II II IIII I I I �r ❑ a {� 6i0AAGE IIII STORAGE 3/A4EAED I , EMK.LLNu.Cv. c[uncrrrn IILJII 1 WALL MOUNTED BIKES WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA TABULATION SUMMARy DATE: 12-02-2019 JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE4? 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 ❑01❑Arm®®Or❑❑❑❑ (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 0®0❑®o oo�rUd oodL®oLmdo®o ❑r®❑ ❑Or❑®0®❑❑❑Ar00®U®Of000D❑ 182'-6" A 1 Al M B 1 Al I L Z) 0 ® 0 0 0 ® 0 F-1 FI � � ao �� caUADF7 � � ce �� ca eo �� ce o 1- 9 1 IL 7-7 _1 $ r @ 8 Fr- B2 A2 A2 I B 1 '-0' 143'-6" 38'-011 SECOND FLOOR 182'-6" 0 0 o q p ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ op p o 0 o q p ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Q N coAl N CV) u.l M LU B A 11'-9%211 N m 10'-21' 04 m lo STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE 30AAOT2 30A310T2 30AAOT2 OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5X2.5' 10'XS'X2.5' 10'XS'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5X2.5' 10'XS'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 'aSX2X'Ot 'B.SX'BX'Of 'B.SX'BX'Ot 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. '25 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. .TIM M .T9U0 Mt .T9U0 BSI r B1 B2 A2 A2 H '-0' 143'-6" 38'-0" FIRST FLOOR SCALE: 3/3211= 1 '-011 A04 DATE: 07-30-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BUILDING 1 TYPE I JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE allalp 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange 01"• "' These plans are copyright protected.Under such (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These (949) 883- 1554 plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF ROOF PLAN 182'-6" B1 Al Al B A 1 L, ® ce ce W ce ® ❑ ❑ ® a� ce ce ce ec ce ® ❑ Q ® II UM e� o e B2 A2 A2 B1 :1E9 I H 143'-6" 38'-011 THIRD FLOOR A05 DATE: 07-30-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BUILDING 1 TYPE I JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange 01"• "• These plans are copyright protected.Under such °° 949 883- 1554 (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. . ............. f �r" BLDG.HGT. BLDG.HGT. 17 ATEHGT PLATE.HGT HEADER HOT �� ❑� � + - l.�/ IIIIIIII�IIIIIIII IIIIIIII ® � � ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o Y - ' '�' r _ I II II II ❑ r - o o co F. F.F. N N r DER HGT a HEADER HGT m `«� �� ❑ -IDII ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � � C o ��.,- r 4 o � ❑ Ll DO ` t a, y� � --4 _ - �''a: - 1 `° X DER HGT zc w ld yk F•r 9, r H ' '. r� :Y `` y f ADER HGT 1 ,I r r r H .. ..'1?. .... ... -. '.. . '? 0.: yam. ._..., .,•. ,. a,... ^> ....� ;. `.y,.,.* - r ' ..a LEFT FRONT BLDG.HGT. BLDG.HGT. 71 T GT El aEl 0 1 F.F. N` N ER HGT Q s HEADER H Q CD o F.F. yc F. ER HGT 4AADER H ink CD o❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑a MUTECD ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑a '❑❑a❑a❑❑❑ ❑❑❑o oo❑o ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑a ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ o0 oa o >. o � 1 - 00 � � F.F. w ��i I ♦1 1 ( e ♦ '" Ya a 4' lkr .. r .. ':,. .1 .... .. "'.. "' .'�rw r-iYl • r` RIGHT REAR SCALE: 3FK11[11 CO" WESTBURY ELEIIATIONS BU I L ❑ I NG 1 TYPE DATE: 12-02-2019RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAJOB NO.: 2016-371 ro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 ❑01❑ArmmFrm Or❑❑❑❑ TEIE](949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o❑o®o oIo®ro❑Ei=r❑d DrEl o°omd®°roE EAETroom I[Jdd°El MEMO d ❑r®❑❑Or❑®❑®❑❑❑Af0❑®❑®Of0000❑ 139'-8" B1 Al Al Al 0 ® Q ce ce ec ca ® ❑ O Lidiq,�F ® ecc ca ec k�8'9 ce Il 11 ❑ 111 FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF = e FLAT ROOF � � � � p L= B2 A2 A2 B2 '-0' 136'-10" SECOND & THIRD FLOOR 139'-8" 139'-8" 100, 0 o q p ❑ ❑ ❑ o op p ❑ ❑ ❑ o 0 o q p ❑ ❑ ❑ o op p ❑ ❑ ❑ � Q Nj co Nj M A 1 M A 1 A 1 B 1 M w cow A A 1 N 11'-11" N N m 0'-2" 11'-11" 10'— N 211 STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE 30AROT2 30AAOT2 30AAOT2 STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE 30AAOT2 30AFIOT8 30AAOT2 OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5X2.5' 10X5'X2.5' 'Z.SX'ZX'Ot 'Z.SX'ZX'Ot 'Z.SX'ZX'Ot 10'X51X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'XS'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 'Z.SX'ZX'Ot 'Z.SX'ZX'Ot 'Z.SX'ZX'Ot 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. P .T9U'o K .T9u0 aS 79U0 ag 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. .T9U0 ZSt .T9U0 M .T9 0 M Q e :o C) e ® o 1 _1 C) C) U L C.0 L co E@-j B2 A2 A2 B2 IL B2 0 0 '-0' 136'-10" '-0' '-0' 136'-10" '-0' FIRST FLOOR (COMMERCIAL READY B2 UNITS) FIRST FLOOR A07 SCALE: 3/3211= 1 '-011 DATE: 07-30-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BUILDING TYPE 11 JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE allalp 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange 37i "' These plans are copyright protected.Under such (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These (949) 883- 1554 plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. EII: 0 11 MI LIg 111111��-111111 11�-11 S�i r�'-..:.^flf ..�,t'� /0'`f •�ME 211= Ems loll ■ ■ SOMEONE ow I• ► f f ■ ■ l ya t ! I • �� s f - �,' _,M.f� ..�:..,',`, v �1 � •■ � sJ-. 4_^.�. � �� ,,� V. e:r. �..� _ n �_� ,�,.,, r s!- Pr '�i�r�..:�,. ■ 1 ■ J' t•• !�� vaM tla. .�J;�.'' ''✓ � .� - a � � ��`�. �Il. `��d;t-.. •..�.. -Aar-- -C r f _ 7i_.-. . ram' },MMMMIft y .F i1 \` Y �.. - �.• ■,.•, 11;'�,L'►' �.:, '� ,. . � __�.'R'��!'�"'.>r' .a .._, ..-� � r a�� 8r,k.CL1.. .. ._.:.� . .�.�� ..��' a � +X-. +rr:�k.'l� _.. ::-....-: ....��..� ...� .. . ...,._. _".l;.�a..... .. _. �+x at��a' �� .� ��.��.:.:�.; >.., _..'� i. . . �� `- '•lk1►1`.�LR • ` ' ■ • ' ' ■ i � I ' n u u ILI1 � rv—�' ■� � - � •� .._.� � � U ,r,,.a, ° h .� ❑ ❑ I� ❑ _ � � � Ill � ,:°,�� . '!S,<� �:s.,�,'/F. ,�yS' �II r+. C� t , •#". � 1��■i�i�i t•M c�: .'�'o b �� ` ., i1111111 mil �� 1 III 1111 /111 ��E��1 r I��I 11�� 1111111 11��1��I�� I��I��I 111111 �t .. �.rya _�;':' _ 16."-f[ h J � .1•Y.. ..-....r�- •■ '{ ..�� I I I I ': 1' I I I� .�: I I •�•+ I I I I 1' I I I 1. I I � \ '1 ��r`FR �`�; 111I :. .. d �. ..� ...• ...�.• -. tl �'•. `_y ....�.:> ,. ...: �...� �� _ �f,r .,4ati .-_i•... .. �.fe �_~ ,. _. r,.. 1 v -_ I yC.. I I �4��.,. �,;. II_.'..'Is _� r;. I ��/� .. � �i.yL-^l.-�� l «,.,..., ..- ..-, .I 1' . . • . . • . • • • ■■mmn■■■■■m■RAW% NINE MEN m■. ■n m n■■■■mn.■ ■■n ■ ■m■■ ■■ ■m■m■ ■■ ■■■m■■■ • ■■■■■ BLDG.HGT. BLDG.HGT. PLATE.HGT ❑_ �❑ HEADER HGT. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 CD Ll Ll co F.F. ADER H a HEADER HGT r7 Ll ❑ /' ❑ CDAlt OF ,nH � ,,•r F. Ut ai'y}"• Y, tb •'lam... � '�# � ... �1 r-. '.. ` A)ER HGT. ;i MOM CD CD L7 J ri I; .. .._ «. M' ,.�' S.: •ate...• F.F. yp h . H . .., .�'M...• .. . ... ._w _. .:.. .- r. _ ,.,- .. ; ,a .. _ :.' ..,. \fir . . �.... ti �. a \�: '•ti.::�. �... LEFT FRONT r BLDG.HGT. BLDG.HGT. 0 PLATE.HGT PLATE.HGT HEADER HGT. HEADER HGT �"i/ ` m ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o I CD F.F. F.F. HEADER HGT. HEADER HGT. ot :1, L CD CD E �Yci - —. L co 'r. Ll H H El F.F. ,•,� '�.,:,� ;`= u EADER HGT - �� o �o oa o0 00 �aao Boa �o�Boa oa ao 00 oa a000 0000 00�moo i aa�aoo❑ ao oa as oar ULI o00ITo DOE IDo 1 s ,I F.F� — r RIGHT REAR A19 SCALE: 1 C8"❑1 CO" DATE: 12-02-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ELEIIATIONS BUILDING 4 TYPE 11 JOB NO.: 2016-371 ro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑ArmmFFM Or❑❑❑❑ TEIE](949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o mo®o❑00rEr❑]❑rod ErEl o°❑md®°roEIE)dd°El MUE1110 d ❑r®❑❑Or❑®❑®❑❑❑Ar❑❑®❑®Oro❑❑❑❑ 25'-8" 8'-1011 17'-011 0 N 231-611 o m OAlN '-'- qO ti n a H m ti H m _ ❑ N 1 'LO..1. N V aO ti h m O I- BREEZWAY Q B1 w F �O o a � w-&- L: E @ AlN O o a _1 Fjo r r D D LJ M O ❑ CID W ❑ C) 231-611 m N =u O r BLDG 5A N�oN�=NN I NI B 1 m ❑ 0Al C) C) Noo-- r =N� morn p� BREEZWAY rl Noo ❑ 21'-1011 115'-9" 10'-9" B1 �_ � O w X U N O o O Al I O W�W X N y>o O ❑ B1 Al 4 O�y�jXN __j O G 1 --A-UEJ-�] Elj IABUEILI" 1EIL 'LO Cq '13nosZ1 '13nosZ1 '1jnOszl '13nosZ1 'llnoszl '11no9z1 O0SZ1 152Cntl' Is2COF1' 132cnLL 1u cal 452caf 432Car 452cal' ,s'zx.9X�01 s'ZX,sXAI ,s'ZX,sX,01 ,S'ZX�sM01 .9zx,9x,o1 ,s'zx.9xX ,'ZXSXAI Jo,X2,X3,21 Jo,x2�n,2, 1OX2,Xs'2. Jo,x2,X52. JOYMS'2, Jo,x2�xs'21 Jo,x2,X52. OV3HH3AO OV3MW OVEIMMO OV3MW OV3H2J3A0 OV3HiW H213A0 OAEHHEVD OAEHHEVD OAEHHEVD OAEBHEVD OAEHHEVD OAEHHEVD OAEI&HEVD 30VNOlS 30VHOlS 30VHOlS 30VNOlS 30vW18 30V2101S 0V2JOlS 2101SVOE 210EME 210KVOE 210EVOE 210HVOE 2109VOE 210EVOE 11'-91/211 } c N W B 1co B 1 W N �1 Q:�In 00 FIRST FLOOR o ❑ ❑ ❑ o V d o�- )=r d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o 27'-7" 171'-2" A010 BLDG 5 B SCALE: 3 3211= 1 '-011 DATE: 07-30-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BUILDING 5A & 5B TYPE III JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange 1"• "• These plans are copyright protected.Under such W (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These (949) 883- 1554 plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. 25'-8" 8'-10" 17'-0" 0 00 Le A 1 in B 1 *01 Al IR ae ❑ 001 li- co G 00 BLDG 5A T � m L14 CD -1 Al U-) LCD LG EffffT FEE G 115'-9" 7'-9" A 1 B 1 al 7A 11 ❑ 00 B1 Al A4 ___j — L E= 0 0 � co ,n e� ❑ LO Ln SECOND & THIRD FLOOR B B B B 1 27'-711 1 171'-2" 10, ■ BLDG 5 B SCALE: 3 32"= 1 '-0" DATE: 07-30-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BUILDING 5A & 5B TYPE III JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE allalp 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange A�• These plans are copyright protected.Under such (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These (949) 883- 1554 plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. FLAT ROOF LOW ROOF LOW ROOF LOW ROOF FLAT ROOF BLDG 5A LOW ROOF LOW ROOF FLAT ROOF LOW ROOF LOW ROOF LOW ROOF LOW ROOF LOW ROOF FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF ROOF PLAN LOW ROO LOW ROO LOW ROOF LOW ROOF A012 BLDG 5 B SCALE: 3 32"= 1 '-0" DATE: 07-30-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BUILDING 5A & 5B TYPE III JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange mot" These plans are copyright protected.Under such 9 4 9 8 8 3 15 5 4 (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. BLDG.HGT. IF[ TT PLATE.HGT HEADER HGT F.F. YY ''; HEADER HGT 00 r '' w t ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ © ❑ oCD M 00 YY ya Y O F.F. — I•` r� I 0 FRONT BUILEIING 5B s BLDG.HGT. PLATE.HGT HE DER HIT_ E EE HE HE 5H 71 -CID ^cl E E F EE EE OE 0 H El ' a" 0❑❑�❑0�� ❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑�❑❑� _ �❑❑❑�❑�❑ <�`` ❑❑❑❑ ❑LILILILILILlU r K 1 BUILL] ING 5B REAR All 3 SCALE: 3E32"❑1 CO" DATE: 12-02-2019 WESTBURY ELEIIATIONS BL ❑ G 5A ❑ 5B TYPE III .RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAJOB No.. 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑ArmmFFM Or❑❑❑❑ TE]EI(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o❑o®o o�o®ro❑EIE:lr❑d ErEl o°omd®°roEIE)dd°d ❑r®❑❑Or❑®0®❑❑❑Af0❑®0®Of0000❑ BLDG.HGT. 77 PLATE.HGT HEADER HGT. 11 El 11 1 LIE] tLE:J I � O CO F.F. i HEADER HGT. ro >El 4)PW 1+� r a w �i K ;::Y:. .,�, I . ,•a.. ..+h° ;:.g,,, �Yf-.. _.yay..�.' _ � Tel -r. RIGHT BUILDING 5A BLDG.HGT. PLATE.HGT EADER HGT oo � o r f F.F. Y oo W 0 E Ll EE L7'1 E ❑❑ ;I_'1❑❑❑❑ o❑o0 0❑ a❑❑❑a❑o I❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑o 00❑❑ �� ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ X o F.F. BUILEING 5A LEFT All 4 SCALE: 3E32"❑1 CO" WESTBURY ELEIIATIONS BL ❑ G 5A ❑ 5B TYPE I I I DATE: 12-02-2019 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAJOB No.: 2016-371 C � STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑Armm1TM Or❑❑❑❑ TE]EI(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o❑o®o❑00rEr❑]❑EIE:lrod ErEl o°omd®°roE EAETIFEIDEEI IE)dd°El TF10110 d ❑r®❑❑Or❑®0®❑❑❑Ar0❑®0®Or0000❑ LOW ROOF LOW ROOF LOW ROOF FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF BUILDING TYPE V ROOF PLAN BUILDING TYPE IV 42'-0" le 97'-0" A3 n LL1 B3 A3 FZ31 - 1 (0 E L FFFN _ N � � N o O O DN o UN Q D NJ o a o 41 '-0" 95'-0" BUILDING TYPE V SECOND FLOOR BUILDING TYPE IV SECOND FLOOR 70'-2" 971-011 �P ~ MAINT. OFFICE B3 C0A3 O AUP 9U 0 N ABOV - N 1O'-5" 1O'-5" 1O'-5" 1O'-5" 2O'-8" C) C4 GARAGE ABOVE:.,' GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE BOV GARAGE N ' GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE N 10'-5" 1 '-5" 1 '-5" 101- " 10'-5" 10'-511 ILI10, N STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD STORAGE STORAGE STORAGEL01V2'!1 STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEADRHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 5'X2.5' 10'X51X .6 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 69'-2" 95'-0" 10, BUILDING TYPE V FIRST FLOOR BUILDING TYPE IV FIRST FLOOR A015 SCALE: 1 /8 If= 1 '-0" DATE: 07-30-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO AM N A CALIFORNIA BUILDING TYPE IV & V B N .: 2 1 - 71 COCUC O G , C OJOB o 063 ro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 2017 Architects Orange (949) 8 8 3- 15 5 4 ( 714) 6 3 9-9 8 6 0 These plans are copyright protected.Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. BLDG.HGT. ^ BLDG.HGT. PLATE.HGT. PLATE.HGT. ADER HGT. �❑ �❑ �❑ �❑ EADER HGT!L LJCD � ❑ F1 ❑ ❑ ❑ , Ln co N F.F. �e ^� ADER HGT. 00❑ Oo 00 } n [10000ai 000E 000E 00 0] M UL K oo a0 ❑UL 1100E 0000 000E❑L oo as 00 00 �. (Dff` 0 f rY :k� ❑ F.E. tea.: �� •: �� k •,. kark � � a LEFT FRONT BLDG.HGT. BLDG.HGT. PLATE.HGT. PLATE.HGT. HEADER HGT, ADER HGT, CD CD CD oLo Ljr. *:rw x El r. ;) 00 F.F. K E HGT. CD O - O f 00 CONCRETE BLOCK WALL L1 HGT❑ ❑ T.E. F.F. RIGHT REAR r ,:x � � ,?��`ay, '• '�,ar,ia>- 1:�+",,.,.�.. �,y;1;axM, ��.. ::��<„qc�slta. .,,.` ;,;�" '�b`^n'a•?�ti,.4.-.�' s T 0 e — r ENHANCELI ELELIATIONS ALONG PARKING AREA REAR 11 El SCALE: 1 C8"❑1 CO" WESTBURY ELEIIATIONS BL ❑ G ❑ TYPE I ❑ DATE: 12-02-2019RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAJOB NO.: 2016-371 CIDro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑ArmmFFM Or❑❑❑❑ T1111(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o❑o®o❑00rEr❑]❑rod Eril o°omd®°roEIE)dd°El TPE1110 d ❑r®❑❑Or❑®❑®❑❑❑Af0❑®❑®Of0000❑ BLDG.HGT. BLDG.HGT. P LATE.H GT. P LATE.H GT. HGT. �❑ �❑ HEADER HGT. o ❑ o 0 0 r7X CD .� cc •'lam.. `� I i i.. N F.F. HGT. " 0000aoo� � o0 00 00 0�..:� ooEDEE❑ F occ ^. F.F. LEFT FRONT BLDG.HGT. BLDG.HGT. P LAT E.H GT. P LATE.H GT. FADER HGT. ER HGT, o t EJ ® o - I :: ,.F CDY �,.aJ.i III CD O _ _k .s} 1F o CD CD DO 00 �. N ,.. . cv F.F. F. HEADER HGT. o Yc o cc P .t CONCRETE BLOCK WALL 1� HGT❑ / .► :�.: .-:r,. F.= F.F. Sil RIGHT REAR All 1111 SCALE: 1 E8 CO" WESTBURY ELEDATIONS BL ❑ G ❑ TYPE ❑ DATE: 12-02-2019RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAJOB NO... 2016-371 ro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑Armm1TM Or❑❑❑❑ TEIE](949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o❑o®o 00rEr❑]❑EIE:lr❑d ErEl o°omd®°roEIE)dd EIJ°El MUE1110 d Er EEIEEI ❑r®❑❑❑r❑®❑®❑❑❑Ar❑❑®❑®Or❑❑❑❑❑ FLAT ROOF AC QQ LOW ROOF FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF BUILDING PARAPET SCREEN ROOF—TOP PPROXIMATE DISTANCES FLAT ROOF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY VARY CONDENSER IN. +6" ABOVE UNIT EQUIPMENT CV N O I I � rr7 O 1 00 r FITNESS FLAT ROOF ROOF PLAN PARAPET WALL DETAIL CLUB HOUSE ROOF PLAN 104'-811 SHOWERS MAIL BO clil EE UNISEX con Pool Eq. Room ) 182 SQFT. COMP. JANIT A ( ❑� SERVER qE C u�J CLOSET LEASING LOBBY CLUB HOUSE TRAS '� _ Tv z _�`,Q w E:1 CLOSUR Tech. SQFT. � � WOMEN (D MEN COMMERCIAL Q DB.DR � ! W/FOB DB.DR wiFoe 1,500 SQFT. � ..�] - G (D OFFICE OFFICE In D A L w 0� LOSET O FICE + IEATIN Z IL U ISEX w ® Q Fad U J U_1 Z=K) LL 1. F[ _j LAI 411111111111111111 GYM. C� 1070 SQFT. 125'-0" o ; co LID M CLUB HOUSE 2 , 914 SQFT. TOTAL : 4 ,414 SQFT FITNESS TOTAL: 1 , 863 SQFT A017 CLUB HOUSE & SCALE: 1 :8 " = 1 '-0" 30'-1 5/16" DATE: 07-30-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA FITNESS FLOOR PLAN JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE '44? Ir 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange oo"• "• These plans are copyright protected.Under such 9 4 9 8 8 3 15 5 4 (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. PARAPET WALL PARAPET WALL r ►r FYYr J f�.-tY PW IE.HG, H .vim; •1 w�� ,r�y ��- , A a y . t • r f L'",..c'.^ �r1 �k�r. ` - "Y ',, icTl� _ ,r f.. y7�}Z- ...+A•.''•�I..�' — yr, `rr. �s . -1~, — ..�. LEFT FRONT Iy� _ PARAPET WALL PARAPET WALL J J a* 1 a* l PLATE.HGT r• F ` r �s 41 HEADER HGT.awl �' - •• ` _y �` • -a � i I r � t ... ,z lw• f V ~ 9^- ..yy„ f ..•hrc:'��b �~ ♦.. 2��• ..Ar: r't ..`+1' "t "y`571d` :.r' f�riw _ •� � � .=:i«;.:- � r",�,t�'"`_ -- � � A .. _ �'�. 7y:' ��s�� `fir :.;r.•. .F-�. RIGHT REAR A018 SCALE: 1 /8 = 1 -0" WESTBURY ELEVATIONS HOUSE DATE: 07-30-2019 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.. 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 2017 Architects Orange These plans are copyright protected.Under such N (949) 8 8 3 15 5 4 (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. 1qq qqrmqr r PARAPET WALL IPARAPT71A PLATE.HGTtieR. y' PLATE.HGT. r u H ADER HOT. �.r HGT. r O O r - � K _ O N O N DO k� 00 LEFT FRONT r PARAPET WALL PARAPET WALL .. '? PLATE.HGT. PLATE.HGT. 'r� aE O �❑ ; . HEADER HOT. EADER HGT. O 1 per, 00 RIGHT REAR A019 SCALE: 1 /8 = 1 —0" WESTBURY ELEVATIONSFITNESS BUILDING DATE: 07-30-2019 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB ` NO.. 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange oo"• "• These plans are copyright protected.Under such W (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These (949) 883- 1554 plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. 24'-0" 10'-9" 32'-5" 32'-2" El M PATIO/ - 6'-11" BALCONY 7'-3" 9,-8„X 64' 42'-0" IVIN 12' 9'-5" LIM „X 1 '-0" ❑ PATIO/ _ ❑ ❑ M BALCONY CD ❑ ❑ ❑ �I ❑ T-2"X T-6" _t El 12'- "X 1 '-0" B DROOM PATIO/ BED OOM ti 11'- "X 12'-6" ❑ = ❑ j BALCONY c [12'-0" 11'-8° B DROOM ❑ IVIN c CD 9'-6"X6'8" =_ 12'- "X13'-0 t 6'-10"X 7'-6" 00 ❑ 11'6"X 1 '-0" NTRY O CO -- ❑ _t N1DE LIVING W/D C wD DINING ICT 13'-0,.X 10'-0" - J--J dw11 M ---� ❑ -1 _J C( 00 J M ENTRY ' L ---� i Z-) N N KITCHEN W.I.C. JI N dw II ❑ W.I.C. coATs❑ DINING , o s DINING WIC J ❑ -6"X 9'10" -- L — J 4. FIXED — — — LI N dw II ISLAND - - j KITCHEN DINING 12-0„X 11 0„ J_ I - - ©� BATH j ❑ IL J I I I I I KITCHEN - �� i I BATH BATH " KITCHEN BATH ENTRY ❑ DN 4 �- 9C � V CB REF. L REF- P. COATS ❑ L � I —LJ�� LJ ❑ P. I W/D I � � -------J RA II GARAGE _= CCESS ACCESS ON GROUND UNIT A1: 1 BR / 1 BA LEVEL UNIT A3: 1 BR / 1 BA UNIT A4: 1 BR / 1 BA UNIT A2: 1 BR / 1 BA LIVABLE AREA: 753 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 739 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 789 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 676 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY: 54 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY: 60 SQ. FT. TOTAL: 830 SQ.FT. PATIO/BALCONY: 100 SQ. FT. QUANTITY:38 QUANTITY: 24 PATIO/BALCONY: 63 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 3 QUANTITY: 8 48'-6" I I EN RY UP 10'-5" 01 10'-5" 10'-5" 10 "'-5 ED _-- GARAGE GARAGE N GARAGE G,RAGIE 559 -0" --- STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE 9,-5" --- OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 1 'X5'X2.5' 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. _ 125 CUFT. 1�5 CUFT. El 1:111 BALCONY BED OOM / 9'-6"x 6'-8" UNIT Al 1 BR 1 BA __ ❑ 1r-z" 11'-0" ❑ � j W1D II LIVING M.B DROOM L-- 13'-0"X 10'-0" LIVABLE AREA: 830 SQ. FT. _ PATIO/BALCONY: 63 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 8 i ® INE ❑ it DINING N FF 51 KITCHEN (� BATH M.BATH IDN Q — ❑ 1 o a L__j ❑ 36 —011 0 36'-011 l000119_91V 11'-9" UNIT B3: 2BR / 2BA LIVABLE AREA: 1174 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY: 63 SQ. FT. 42'-8" ❑ PATIO/BALCONYti ❑ PATIO/BALCONY QUANTITY: 7 6'-6" -' 11'.3"X 6'-6' 7'-3" CO BEDRO)M BEDRO M 48 —6 11 ❑ 13'-0"X 1 '-3" ❑ ❑ 13'-0"X 1 '-3" I I ❑ M ❑ M ❑ PATIO/ T_ BALCONY ❑ BE ROOM ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ t T-2„X T-9„ ti BE ❑❑ DOOM 10' RX JI 11'- "X 13'-0" ❑❑ M L 1'-0F FIC 0'8" BEDRO WIC 12' 4'-3" W.I.C. I 12 4'-3" X1 12'-9" 8" IVXI1 Ars- EN 11 -0 -- ❑ RY UP 10'-5" 10'-5" 10'-5" 10'-5" 10'15" W.I.C. W.I.C. 00 U') - BATH ---J BATH - O N -- - - I W.I.C. Conrs _ oh D� --- GAR/#GE �7,11XED 'L L r isLXnNo � GARAGE GARAGE N GARAGE GARAGE ____ DINING ❑ DINING L I FIXED BATH � I W/D _ � ISLAND DINING _ I dw I '-4"X 9'.10" _ ❑❑ -- J F_ r F ___ STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE STORAGE � n KITCHEN BATH KITCHEN B H OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD OVERHEAD BATH ° II KITCHEN ENTRY 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' 10'X5'X2.5' IIIUUU r, r, ENTRY cB iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillI r-- 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT. 125 CUFT 125 CUFT. 125 CdFT. CB CB REF. REF. i F 7' ❑ L—L J L J REF. P. ENTRY �COAT,,1 IAI/D i I II GARAGE GARAGE GARAGE ACCESS ACCESS ACCESS ON GROUND UNIT B1: 2BR / 2BA LEVEL UNIT B2: 2BR / 2BA UNIT B2: 1 B / COMMERCIAL READY / 2BA UNIT B3: 2BR / 2BA LIVABLE AREA: 1,021 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 1,077 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 772 SQ. FT. LIVABLE AREA: 1174 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY: 56 SQ. FT. PATIO/BALCONY:76 SQ. FT. COMMERCIAL READY: 305 SQ.FT. PATIO/BALCONY: 63 SQ. FT. QUANTITY:30 QUANTITY: 17 PATIO/BALCONY: 121 SQ. FT. QUANTITY: 7 QUANTITY:4 A020 SCALE: 1 /8 11= 1 '-0" DATE: 12-02-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA UNIT PLANS JOB NO.: 2016-371 ro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 2017 Architects Orange (949) 883- 1554 ( 714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 These plans are copyright protected.Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. 18'-4" 00 o � o 9'-0" v , 9, 0„ SIDEWALK CD CDz o z SIDEWALK 8'-0" g OQ WHEEL STOP WHEEL STOP 0 0 0o 00 0 , 0 N TRASH ENCLOSURE LAYOUT STANDARD HANDICAP PARKING VAN LAYOUT STANDARD HANDICAP PARKING LAYOUT METAL FLAT ROOF METAL FLAT ROOF N N O W O W Co Co SIDEWALK o z_ WOOD SIDING OVER CMU STUCCO OVER CMU COLOR TO MATCH BRICK CAP COLOR TO MATCH RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HEEL STOP o PARKING PARKING PARKING BRICK CAP METAL METAL PAINTED GATE PAINTED GATE BRICK VENEER TO MATCH PEDESTRIAN BUILDING ENTRANCE AT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STANDARD PARKING LAYOUT TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS OPT A TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS OPT B A021 PARKING & SCALE: 1 /8" = 1 '-0tt DATE: 12-02-2019 ` WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA TRASH ENCLOSURE JOB NO.: 2016-371 ro STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 �� © 2017 Architects Orange (949) 8 8 3- 15 5 4 ( 714) 6 3 9-9 8 6 0 These plans are copyright protected.Under such protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 4 A B D 5 2 3 C B A, 1 Nk Ll 11 j a — 77 1 F71 ----- - - 4 AL ....... ..... *9 ----- ....... A Cotton White SW 7104 I - B Accessible Beige SW 7036 1 Exterior Plaster 30/30 Eldorado Stone 3 James Hardie 4 Vinyl Windows Sand Finish TundraBrick - Ashland LAP SIDING White To match paint specs To match p paint spec C p NIP C Foggy Day SW 6235 =—.=M0 f I �• I I 4 ` D Iron ore SW 7069 5 Fabricated Metal Railing (D Metal Sun Shade Blades 7 metal Standing Seam Roof 8 Louvered Privacy Shutter wl Cable System To match paint spec C Dark Bronze Dark Bronze (*not shown on elevation) (*not shown on elevation) E Brainstorm Bronze SW 7033 Am22 DATE: 95-92-29 1 9 WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SchemeJOB NO.: 2916-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2019 Architects Orange (949) 883- 1554 (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 These plans are capyri protected.Under such protection unauthorized us use is not peirnil6etl-These plans shell not be reproduced yr used without written permission by Architects Orange. I 1 1 1 1 B A 4 7 D C A 2 6 3 5 8 ❑ C I S - - IF lit It r V i k W b —_ -- ' i I ii fr A White Flour SW 7102 IiG I B Softer Tan SW 6141 1 Exterior Plaster 30/30 2 Eldorado Stone 3 James Hardie 4 Vinyl Windows 5 Atas Metal Panels Sand Finish TundraBrick - Ashland LAP SIDING White Metafor - Medium Bronze 03 To match paint specs To match p paint spec C p Brainstorm Bronze SW 7033 I D Iron ore SW 7069 1IAN 6 Fabricated Metal Railing 7 Metal Sun Shade Blades 8 Metal Standing Seam Roof 9 Louvered Privacy Shutter w/ Cable System To match paint spec C Dark Bronze Dark Bronze (*not shown on elevation) A023 DATE: 05-02-20 1 9 WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SchemeJOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. , ORANGE, CA 92866 0 2019 Architects Orange (949) 883- 1554 (714) 6 3 9 9 8 6 0 These plans are copyrightprotected.Under such protection unauthorized use e is not permitted-These plans shall not be reproduced or used wdhouS written permission by Architects Orange. o V tiJ� �yJ • i�� d r �..� :fir i14 /+ - �- r--�� `± jai} - ■ aa. � ■f //��/ it r ■ a.a.,R��' ►�� . ',} � h. : .. /��/:�■1� I�� /� � I� 1 1 - ■ - , ON /MM Res Ilk Rld o� amp a`. s. 1�.� /r114;��►� O �fd j _ �..;� � �i_►iiii�•rii�ir.ri�ir�`i%� ��,��11 •f. P. NON tV Fill I �gip. � '1► 1��■■I■1 - .� ..�. arr, ,� ,� AAA ® 1 :. ,■a .. ��" may" ■�, �•'"•* -� . ;y +�+*0 �a- `ter - ■�E :� r r ► � _�-.�•'` � ,• �• fly 1 - ■- , ■ f } Q J I 1 T r �.f6a �I:e iA_ � ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ y�ami. ♦ � g� �:' r.''�''?.i - 4� � ~ ■ � Illlullllll a� -•i.:a r ; ^.L. V _ : f . 1 MIMI U � • • 1 � � i �',.' �,! aid. -�'• ':+i v a ■ r, - ICI i � ■ � '. �k � �� y•�'� ti"�+!�" �' 1. , ■ r ■ %� •4:r r�'v-+v v. I j . , . - '� Lam.-:a:r .�.■ it ' - —I � ®�®: •�� S� `' ` �"'�°� � •� ��,�11 1 �,:.. .: �'r¢ I li. �� ■•�••■� ..� r �AI, , I : . � 1• i 1 .1 1 U {3 N• r•1■■ .��l rid► " �� .- * �f ONE , .. :.-.�":.� . ■� ■�• /.►,,, •� � / � lam`' - .� .�!j� •� ��. y-� �k" �►�y � - O � 1 . . ♦� , , a ■ ► � �� , ��iJ�J� I�►,*J�I I I J�J�`�ry ` I, � ------ � �► — � • � # � %' -ems, �+ � ,_ �� , mSm r v, po pr MH 4�".:..�':.•, :Yz`'•�=.:� II�J�• �II� ►III r. © ' 1 a 1 1 F`s�3v a Ji:• J�� Eel I ■ Ili Q ' r . : : 1 "'-•��:- M III ✓II ►�III _ •• �t �►' p NO ool, leg WON MISS III Y-' Ltw n wti• 1 0 — 3 .� •:. . .:... � _ � �t 1 'mow•. ► a. `�• . . f�M .,.,.,.,., O - .1 1 1 1.- , a ,- 1 , FAIR` � � I I � �� I I ' � ' h}� ��lqr;, E 4�,,,!�,,• ,�+1�.'A r . ,,,,,,,,, - ,�C -� � I I IQ' ''J � I I I �� Irl - ��`' t r ��^ rr-•� �, ., f'--- - �\ �� J �!! - r _ - l ` I�•O� � ':-fi �� -s- _ � Ile-- I: i r A �I..ry�_I�CS.' �, � ::.. �,v �Tv�• ,c e.,, � ':1.�� L �i �.�:.. - � :�d 7k j�r-r.rt♦i'+.r.•rY'i:+'.• � �'se _ _ AAoao a u t� ♦,,,.r. -..{ * o� ,:r:� oovo =� o� .:........ � . �:��. . I � ��= '� � � �� ' .''• '_�.--` a. ..a-. � ._:, .p-,•"" Ian CLIENT 1 OWNER X PROPOSED COMPOSITE TREE TABLE X Stratham Homes _ X 2201 Dupont Ave, Suite 300 DO SY-j%4 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS TY Irvine, CA 92612 'y x (949) 833-1554 —X "': Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 15 Gal M 8 hvavvv X vvvavvv o ❑vvvvv O '+Y'►�,, v vv v QX O f LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT i (X Ginkgo biloba Maidenhair Tree 24 Box M 21 = DLA inc 4 4 0 PDX J 4 4 4 4 v 4 7W Koriander Design v\ \ vavvvvv X v c v �O o _= Landscape Architecture L , V Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 24"Box M 15 _ = 7426 Cherry Avenue TUBULAR STEEL FENCE , #210-641 + WITH PEDESTRIAN GATE m Fontana,Ca 92336 + 909.744.4376 ++++ + + + + + L X ' +++++++*. * +++ a a 4°°v Ox '. Olea europaea'Fruitless' Fruitless Olive 24"Box L 8 SEAL + *+++* ❑v v v v v❑ + / of .. + + + + + + + + + � � 4 4 4 17,717 4 - +++ + + + + + + + + 4 4 4 4 4 4 ® s ++++++.++++++ +++++++ IYK+++++++++*+*+++++++ LANDSCgpE + + + + + + + + cy o + + + ++.++++++++++++ + Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm 12 BTH L 15 --------------- �' 'O X+ ++++++iq�+++ ++ + � 'll�} S rn + + + 4 •4 + + + + + © C po ++++ :�+ +'�,�+ +`:: y DO - SITE PLAN 9-30208 + + + + X .�+++ sv°v X yagrus romanzoff'ianum Queen Palm 12 BTH M 7 N.T.S. X -, CORNHOLE �`* + 4 0 oQaX 9�£ OF CA�\F + # # + + .+ #++ �, o 0 x. \+++++ + + + + + + ao° o x \ is+\\*+++'�•• +;+;++ �Qx Utmus parvifolia'True Green' Evergreen Chinese Elm 24"Box L 11 PROJECT INFORMATION + + + + + O + + + + + + « + + + + XX +�+� ++++++ X Y + + + + + + + + +a+ ❑v❑ X + +++++++++++++++++++++ 4 P 7 7 7 4 OX " ` + + ' ` ` + + ' + + + PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE - STREETSCAPE + a + + + + + + + + + + °V 7° o g MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SPECIES + + + + + + . + + + + + x� Washin tQma rabusta Mexican Fan Palm 12 BTH L 10 *+++++++++++++++++++++++ 44 L^1 '+++++++++'+++++++' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE �D SY L BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS TY ++`+++'+ . . .+ +.+.+ WITH PEDESTRIAN GATE �� 0 fi := + + } + + + + +++ + + + + + + r v v QX f ❑v❑ f1 ' ' ' ' ' + +.,., / P v v 4 v v 7 X) eijcra parvi flora Australian Willow 15 Gal M 8 + r++++++++++++++++ +++++ +% + , ❑vvvvvv X vvvvvvvyo + + + + + + + + + + } 4 7,7 4°/ O •� + + + ++ ` 11 + + Q Buxus s- Suffruticosa Dwarf English Boxwood 15 Gal M Q + +`�++ + +++#++\+++' � ,T �/'� Dianella r.'Little Rev' Little Rev Flax Lily 1 Gal L ++�h + +a\+ +.+ + •+++ +�+++«+a++ 1+�+a++ ;'; � "� � Q Dietes iridioides Fortnight Lily 5 Gal M Ct rT1 + + + *�+ 'BOCCE } V 7 o ® Festuca glauca'Elijah Blue' Elijah Blue Fescue I Gal M + + vv4 ^'� vvvvvv X ++++++++:. `+++ vvvvvv❑ . ,, 1 " BALL ++% �. 7 4 7 4 4 7 4 �� ® Gazania Mitsuwa Yellow' Trailing Yellow Gazania 1 Gal M + +++ 4 4 4 4 4❑ + ++++++S+++ ++ p 7 ti/ Nandinia'Fire Power' Fire Power Nandina 5 Gal l�'��l �J +�+++ + �+ + ++\+ ++%+++ + + + + X tl�"I ►/1 + + `+++++'+�4± + �Qx (D Rosa'Iceberg' Iceberg Rose 5 Gal M ^ T + +++++.++++is++++ ++•++ ` VV X� + -+•"•++'* *+*++ 4 v44 x Q Rosmarinus o. 'Tuscan Blue' Tuscan Blue Rosemary 5 Gal L ++++�+. _ _ ++ + + + ++}��*++++++++++a+++ °74v G° OO p�p� Grouted Cobble BICYCLE RACK (3) +}+'++ ' + '+' " ' + '-' VV TUBULAR STEEL FENCE OD !: c.. .`. . .`.`+ ++ WITH PEDESTRIAN GATE XO o c a PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE - PERIMETER U r:t \ + + + + + + + MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SPECIES + + a a + + } a + vvv X \ + +++ + + + + +.. + i .+. 4`-+ + + + 7 by 4 V 4 o w+ + + a } + + + + + + + + + + + + -='�`�=__ ^`• ` + ' + + ` ` + + ' + ` + ` + + + + ' 4 V°V V V°o SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS 2 Qa �--� :% + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + /+ + + + / Q 1 + + + t + + t t + + i + } j + + + + + 4�7 ' A X "+++*,*+ + + + + + ++++++i t / ++#+iy+� + + °°°, O Z4-4 PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE - EASEMENT - + + +++++++++++++ } } �,+++ + + +++,�++'+ °' ax Q Callistemon'Little John' Dwarf 5 Gal L w W X + # + + + # + + + + + + + # + + + + ++++ X ~ W v MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SPECIES 0 x ++ ++++;.i.r+ ++.+ .'+ + +t+Y+ + +t+'+it++++ + + + + + + + + + +�++++ y, X Dianella r.'Little Rev' Little Rev Flax Lily 1 Gal L SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS +a.+a+j'*`+"++.+.`*++'.'.'*'+'.'.`.' ' '. 00 Festucaglauca'ElijahBlue' Elijah Blue Fescue I Gal M a PmIFn Fiu�m X +++ ++++"+++++++`+�w+-; t, ..,y+++++� ++++ \ _• •W� JF y`�� . + +'C} + + _ �.,� .. ...-._...,. '•` REVISIONS fX Agave'Blue Glow' Blue Glow Agave 5 Gal L SEATING AREAF-T '.`.'4'+++' VOLLEYBALL + .++ =+"''' �1 '+- + + \ ax Leucophyllum Thunder Cloud Thunder Cloud Texas Sage 5 Gal L s +;� + COURT '+++ + + O Aloe striata Coral Aloe I Gal LrsOFT ++ ++++ ++++ =+ a° �X +++- a + + + + + + + + + + + + + + a '-� 7 V a 7 X •+ + + + + 0 o Pennisetum s. 'Rubrum' Purple Fountain Grass 5 Gal L + + + + + + + + + « a + vvvvv 7 4 ti OX Festuca'Siskiyou Blue' Siskiyou Blue Fescue 1 Gal L +++ « + + + « + + + « + + + « + +++ v v°vvv❑ ++++++}++++*+ }+++++++++ +++++,+�+ ++ v v v v° X Qx Podocarpus'Maki' Shrubby Yew Podocarpus 15 Gal M + + + + + 4a x Leucophyllum'Thunder Cloud' Thunder Cloud Texas Sage 5 Gal L � isex ® rp \% ++++++++•+++•+++++++ + + ++ /+ + +++ + o +#++`++++.+++++++1 ■+++++++#+#+++a oo Rhus intcgrifolia Lemonade Berry 5 Gal L Sedum acre Goldmoss Sedum I Gal L r # + + + + + + + + + a + + + a # + + + X v P a 3 Mulch Layer + + + + + + + + + + + + Senecio serpens Blue Chalksticks I Gal L GYM. + + + + + a + + + a # + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . . VPP°°aQ + } + + + r + + + + + + 4 7vv f� +;++++++ Marathon I1 Sod + a # + + 4 + « + + + + + + + O O a + + vv J 3"-6"Dia. Cobble ++«+++*+++ ++++ 4 ° oO ++ + +++ 4 4 POOL ++++ ++++++ �\ °4 �Y 717 ++++++*++ + + ++++ 4 +l AF P7 �J + + + + + 44 ODD O PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE - POOL AREA °4°VV , MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SPECIES ! `:. , ++++ �� " P°q 0 r >y 4 '+,* OPEN TURF # a SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS TY w + AREA + V 0 o a - - - +;+�+;+� 4 P p DESIGNER agrus xomanxoflianum Queen Palm 12 BTH M 7 - _rp ++s' ++{+{+' ++�++ v v v v rrr� vvv O �+ /� ^ + + + s + +y+ d7V ° '� !` C7 GOtlQX MS 17107 +++++•a++++++•}+ /V v v ` ➢' v❑ v v V/ /. O oo:ma vela N, ° a ° y/ ef.W ® MS 12.13.19 _r. striata Coral Aloe I Gal L SEATING AREA •, MS AS SHOWN +++,�+4+;+.�3sp ° ;, ,�' P 4 4P Vv /r �JFf%F 3K fO �� Sib ougainvillea Bougainvillea 15 Gal L ~ ' +% �°°° ^' '' ; " �© SHEET TITLE /vvv - ❑v vvv/ / v11 ❑ 0 Cordyline'Design-a-Line' Burgundy Cordyline 5 Gal M y V 4 ° o v° °°4 r' _ •°°v x y � � � 7 .1•.�y. i VO 4�, � I. vvv f: v vvv 4v / �" '� /vv❑ vv V PPP .' 4. J!'. 44 40P 444 - iA; 444 PP o LANDSCAPE vp❑ n• � va❑ ❑v ❑a❑ /Ov❑ 9 V❑ Dianella r. 'Little Rev' Little Rev Flax Lily 1 Gal L � � _ ' :f p 'vvoq z�� /vv❑ vvv �(� .:c-i' I / •.p -•, .r 7c�� i 0 V°/ /,•'ice��" /ry v v 4 74❑ '.K Qx Podocarpus Maki Shrubby Yew Podocarpus 15 Gal M �© CONCEPT 'Maki' r� 7.._._ •,�v.,' V V° �J M- imp + f Strelitzia reginae Bird of Paradise 5 Gal M �`;`" -------- -------- '- r y; '` 96 DO v vvv ❑v v �v t, °° b°4 ° SHEET NUMBER vvv vvp/ � '� r �❑77 V V X L-2 —.—.—.— .—.— .--- ---- ---- -—.— .—.— .—.— .—.— .r........ ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF ..—.—.—.—.—. WAY, INCLUDING STREET TREES, SHALL BE 20, 10, 0 20' 40' SHT. 2 OF 6 �� INSTALLED PER THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS. SCALE: I"=20' CLIENT / OWNER }� Xax °©oik �� Stratham Homes 00 X 2201 Dupont Ave, Suite 300 o �, ©� Irvine, CA 92612 t*: J_:� x V d�OO (949) 833-1554 fyi 007 +`+ ❑vvvv O Yi-} i, vvvvv l^J° + + + + 1vvvvv •�.:+�•+} � vvvvv vvvv 0n V LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT vvvvv OX J vvv44 = KOLA inc vCv009 ,� v7vvv f nrn` �� = Koriander Design fr �11�y e == Landscape Architecture °X p 7426 Cherry Avenue ` [XJ m p #210-641 '^' d Fontana,Ca 92336 # 3 0 a 909.744.4376 + } 4 SEAL + + r+ i 4°VVV V/O W ,+ + ❑vvv a OX a ri �IK ' 0 Eisr�vE"ue �`� rn " rn , J O� 1 gna+ura aV4 SITE PLAN �� ` ��20 v v v v v ram. +} enew 4 4 4 v v r vvvvv Uu / \ i O© N.T.S. vvvvv % E � :J / r } vvoL^J f�9�£ �F A�1W O vvv lJ `�� OVPv4 O C \ vvvvvv x fl � O© v vvvv / y vrorov4vv X r vvvvv X JY� ,'.i` ,�' , Vv4 V O PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE - EASEMENT f o PROJECT INFORMATION 'h MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SPECIES ° / � a� °a td 4 O o OX SYMBOL. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WLTCOLS Q+ v v v x � vvvv❑ TUBULAR STEEL 3 +0% �D a a4 �� Agave'Blue Glow' Blue Glow Agave 5 Gal L FENCE Q + ° (D Aloe striata Cora] Aloe I Gal L � x o �� -LJ O \ vca X� vvvv❑ } vvvvvv \ yy��,yy��y� y� y� a a vvvv vvv OO Festuca'Siskiyou Blue' Siskiyou Blue Fescue 1 Gal L 17 _ Q �• � 17 ��+�+�.+ \\\ °°�� °X© Leucophyllum'Thunder Cloud' Thunder CIoud Texas Sage 5 Gal L SECONDARY VEHICULAR E + + + + + x , . . . . . . . . Sedum acre Goldmoss Sedum 1 Gal L GATED ENTRY f + • + + ~ + + * ~ + 4 I r , X Seneci❑serpens Blue Chalksticks I Gal L �• - so.1.. tr + + + . + + _ «++.+++ « + ++++«+++a+ cv 1 + +++++++++++ OPEN TURF �;?�" +++a•a*+ Marathon It Sod �+ o X x x+++'�'�+ AREA /,v�v�vn v�v +r+ +% ❑vvvvv�v v 3u-6"Dia_Cobble + + + +a + + r vvvvvv %+ +++++ + + ♦ +++ + + ❑vvvvvv rLr/Cj�~� �. + + + + . . + + +++++++a+++++++++++++++ X +`++++++++++++++++++++++ © �1 r x . ++++ ++++Cj, x Ct + +'''+'+'+'-'{'-'+'-'{'+' + 40 oaf PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE - PERIMETER J[ ; f''� O �' n l • + +++++++ + + • + + ❑v❑v p❑❑ O 1� V+'+ + + + © MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING SPECIES O 9 -1 + +++ + + +++ + + +++ + v v v p v p O TUBULAR STEEL ++' + + « + + + ~ . + + / ro 9 �' ++'++++++++++++++++++++++ �' °°v° SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS Ct + + FENCE , ~ +++++.~++++++ ~ + TUBULAR STEEL FENCE °X) +++ + ++++ + C� +"+++.++++++ ++; ;+ WITH PEDESTRIAN GATE (X 0 Cal listemon'Little John' Dwarf Bottlebrush 5 Gal L C,] I i + + / vvvv 0 � Z Il -!� NINE& ++ .+.++++; ,+ T ❑❑4°° Dianella r. 'Little Rev' Little Rev Flax Lily 1 Gal L p m _ +++ + +,,++ + +� � °°°vvv oo � � � ❑vvvvvv Festuca glauca'Elijah Slue' Elijah Blue Fescue 1 Gal MLu � � � � ■� 0 MATCHLINE A. SEE SHEET L-1 ++�;�=+ :'-�=�.+:'= ,J°� Leucophyllum'Thunder Cloud' Thunder Cloud Texas Sage 5 Gal L z �' U Lu 4--4 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE WORKSH€€T �� '` _ `�� + .++' '''. X �r Pennisetum s '..o � +,+,++ ,•,+,++ *+,+, N _ Rubrum Purple Fountain Grass 5 Gal L U U � Lu This v urksheet is filled out by the project applicant and is a required element of the Landscape Document Package + +�+ . , \ O C� o �{ - ++++ +++++++ ++++r �;; ( Podocarpus'Maki' Shrubby Yew Podocarpus 15 Gal M Lu W Reference Evapotranspiration (Eto) 66.2 �; x` ``;++ ' + + '+' + a + 0 Rhus integrifolia Lemonade Berry 5 Gal L \�+ 'BADMINTON^ =^` Hydrozone#1 Plant Irrigation Irrigation ETAF Landscape ETAF x Area Estimated Total +'. + REVISIONS Planting Factor(PF) Method Efficiency (PF/IE) Area Water Use " �` +��,+,+++i+,.. +'�# ` 3"Mulch Layer Description IE SO- FT ETWU r x x.r+;+;.;+;+ ;.;+++++++'`k� Regular Landscape Area {� �`x + ;�+++'++++ ++++++ x + + + + +++ + + + Low Water Esmt 0.1 Drip0.81 0-12 7,700 951 39 017 x +++*++++.*.*.+++.*.* r1 Low Water Peri 0.2 Drip 0.81 0.25 21,800 5,383 220,928 + , ,+,+,+,+,•,•+ + /V Mod Water Street 0.4 Drip0.81 0-49 7,462 3,680 151,042 �� '�� +, ++++ .'+'++++�� ,f Mod Water Pool 0A Drip0-81 0-49 1,105 546 22,397 h ��+•+*'++•++r+t+ +; Mod Water Interior 0.4 Drip 0.81 0.49 8,855 4,373 179 479 Active Turf Area 0.7 QverFe 0.75 1 0-931 18,068 16,863 692,144 16), xxx +++.+++++++++++++y '+++ Totals 1 64,980 31,795 41 Special Landscape Areas `+'+++'�i:*+++++++ {�,7 Active Turf 045 18.068 8.130.6D 333.712 ` a + + + � ° YY Totals 1 180581 8130.6 IETWU Total 1,305.007 j Special Landscape Area (SLA)Total 18,068 Maximum Allowed Water Allowance(MAWA)* 1,800,584 � Hydrozone#1 Planting Description Irrigation Method Irrigation Efficiency ETINU(Annual Gallons Required)_ [� Eg Cverspray or 0.75 for spray head Eta x 0.62 x ETAF x Area �? 1)front lawn drip 0.81 for drip where 0.62 is a conversion 2)low water use planting factor that acre-inches per DESIGNER 3)medium water use planting acre per year to gallons per square foot per year Ms 17107 POURED IN MS 12.i 3.19 MAWA(Maximum Allowed Water Allowance)=(Etc)(0,62)[EETAF x LA)+((1-ETAF)x SLA)] PLACE WALL CAP 8' O.C. MAX. TUBULAR STEEL where 0.62 is a conversion factor that acre-inches per acre year to gallons per square foot per year. - MS" AS SHOWN LA is the total landscape area in square feet 4" O.C. Typ FENCE SLA is the total special landscape area in square feet SHEET TITLE ETAF is u.55 for residential areas and 0.45 for non-residential areas J ° LANDSCAPE ETAF Calculations ['t�] [D in CONCEPT d Regular Landscape Areas � Total ETAF x Area 23,665 Average ETAF for Regular Landscape Areas must be 0.55 or belo Total Area 64,980 for residential areas, and 0.45 or below for non-residential areas Average ETAF 0.36 SHEET NUMBER SECTION All Landscape Areas FINISH GRADE SECTION FINISH GRADE Total ETAF x Area 31,795 L-3 Total Area 64,980 6-6" HIGH BLOCK WALL Sitewide ETAF 0.49 TAN, SLUMP BLOCK F-6" TUBULAR STEEL FENCE 20' 10' 0 20' 40' SHT. 3 OF 6 BLACK, TUBULAR STEEL SCALE: l"=20' CD CLIENT 1 OWNER T -1 fi + + + + + + j Stratham Homes + + + + + Lam- 2201 Dupont Ave, Suite 300 + + + + Irvine, CA 92612 \ ` (949) 833-1554 + I �' LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / + �DLA, inc + ' - - ; _ = Koriander Design + + , ` Landscape Architecture � + + 7426 Cherry Avanue + 1 = #210-641 _ Fontana,Ca 92336 r ` + + 1 f 909.744.4376 TREE? + + SEAL RAISED TREE WV,L L I + + 1 J r WELL , + ar�oscap � - Imo•~ % f + f ` J / - + Sa(a 4P�yf j r DE OMPOSED s -I FOUNTAIN + w GRANITE - + - g �I i -2 R 9- 0 a30l Dote RAISED I , + + + + Renewal PLANTER , 4\ + + i\ ' I + + PROJECT INFORMATION SEATWALL / + + - + RAISED TREE WELL ENLARGEMENT - r SEATWALL SCALE: 114"_ F-0" f - -- - + + _ r' —1 + + + + + + + + + / + + 00001, a CENTRAL FOUNTAIN ENLARGEMENT SCALE: 311 b" = 1'-0" (� a(IX ►-1 ct I r� CENTRAL [) FOUNTAIN ��j / • LU En REVISIONS Ia RAISED � PLANTER / � r- ��_. / t DESIGNER y ----- �--- • �' , 1 I 4000, MS 17107 MS 12.13.19 ® � SEATWALL MS AS SHOWN ► , 1 SHEET TITLE I k LANDSCAPE i � -- - f., ;_�-_,. � AMENITIES SHEET NUMBER CENTRAL OPEN SPACE ENLARGEMENT RAISED PLANTER ENLARGEMENT L-4 SCALE: 118"= 1'-0" SCALE: 311b" = 1'-Q" SHT. 4 OF 6 � �� CLIENT 1 OWNER I I Stratham Homes 2201 Dupont Ave, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 833-1554 f LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT REMOVABLE VOLLEYBALL POLE I = KD LA, inc _ = Koriander Design = Landscape Architecture 7426 Cherry Avenue #210-641 x I TURF AREA x Fontana,Ca 92336 x 909.744.4376 x I f x > SEAL _ X y x " x PLAY AREA I x x �pt1[15CApE x l x } L4�1� S S a i a=a' x I x - � x } r gnpture x J k 9-30-26 enawal ❑+e x VOLLEYBALL NET :< x or CA o <) e (x PROJECT INFORMATION VOLLEYBALL COURT ENLARGEMENT 1 L SCALE: 118"= 1'-0" c x x J V1 TURF AREA PLAY AREA W ' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - - . CORNHOLE COURT ENLARGEMENT SCALE: 118"- F-0" 0 i!� w o .,--, U < LU - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x - - — — — — — — — — — — z c� .� x I I x w W Cd w x x I I I I X � W s� 0 p.., x I x x REMOVABLE BADMINTON POLES x REVISIONS x PLAY AREA x fJIBA 1: � x TURF AREA TURF AREA x x DMINTON NET x x L - - - - - -� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — W - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - K or y . � �~ IN IIIF— III 1I i . BADMINTON COURT ENLARGEMENT x ' SCALE: 118"= P-0" x k X k x k x x x x x " DESIGNER t x x x x x MS 17107 K _ x x r,e•.r. nm MS 12.13.19 CMdnxl lfy i x x x MS AS SHOWN TURF AREA x x x SHEET TITLE x x x x �� x x PLAY AREA x x LANDSCAPE x x K x x AMENITIES x7 SHEET NUMBER BOCCEBALL COURT ENLARGEMENT L-5 SCALE: 118"= P-0" SHT. 5 OF 6 N CLIENT 1 OWNER X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Stratham Homes 2201 Dupont Ave, Suite 300 X X X X Irvine, CA 92612 X X X X (949) 833-1554 r— r 0 0 o VIEW FENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KDLA, inc \ - - Koriander Design CHAISE LOUNGE OUTDOOR DINING _ — Landscape Architecture - = 742fi Cherry Avenue #210-641 -=qMNFontana,Ca 92336 909.744.4376 COVERED SEATING AREA SEAL I- BUILT-1N BBQ ISLAND WITH SEATING �pt<1[15CApE Sa gnpture 9-30-20 Renewal Dote OF C oF�� PROJECT INFORMATION i P001 SPA W � 1 - - - - - - -- - _ - �-' ►-� CHAISE LOUNGE -- - � z o � w w ------------- En tZ 0` REVISIONS X o > --------------- OUTDOOR �I SEATING -------- _ , 1 COVERED ENTRY y \� DESIGNER P Iwm� MS 17107 r,e•.r��. n�m MS 12.13.19 j CMdnxl ey MS AS SHOWN SHEET TITLE i LANDSCAPE AMENITIES f SHEET NUMBER POOL AREA ENLARGEMENT SCALE: 114"= P-0" L-6 SHT. 6 OF 6 W SITE UTILIZATION PLAN 10 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES w w w JUj Q � � � O zZ D Q W W TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 VICTORIA PARK co ¢ � Q w Q IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIALLJ � O � J w = BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK "Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. Q > Q BASELINE ROAD 0 JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT w APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT SEE SHEET SU-02 w w "" �" �m a } R ET MILLER i w w LU AVENUE PROJECT m W. LIBERTY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FOOTHILL BLVD PKWY S. IJ� / ZONING v (AS PART OF THE HERITAGE 15 SPECIFIC PLAN OF FONTANA) ARROW ROUTE WHITTRAM PROJECT METROLINK BOUNDARY FONTANA MOTOR MEDIUM I , � Q�GP // � � � SPEEDWAY LOT 9s / �� , �° , � I V VICINITY MAP RESIDENTIAL 1 TRACT NO. 15711-1 HOUSING ZONING 1 M.B. 278/96-103 G/ ,�` �.� L U v 0 STRATHAM HOMES DEVELOPER/OWNER ' LOT11, / i � � � i� � ® I I Q �, � I / PROJ ECG // // / / 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 i ETIWANDA / _ ' IRVINE,CA92612 COLONY I /�' BOUNDARY ,/ �' U) O I CONTACTS LANDS, BLOCK Q � � , I PHONE:(949)883-1554 /l �� i I C� "Y" M.B 2/24 / / / / I I w Q � CML ENGINEER: TRACT NO. 16317 t TRACT NO. 15711-1 M.B. ,� / // �� ® I TRACT N0. 16318 0 M.B. 307/48-53 ' MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 278/96-103 / / / i LOT 9 I O 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230 ® I M.B. 307/54-59 V RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 BLOCK "Y" M.B I I CONTACT- MARK BERTONE 2/24 - �, I I O ' PHONE: (909)481-6322 40 ARCHITECT DRAINAGE EASEMENT ARCHITECTS ORANGE i Q DEDICATION PER TRACT / / / / F 7 ® fir- I 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. / / 11 ® r ORNAGE, CA 92866 ' N0. 15711 1 M.B. / / Q L CONTACT- / ..� _ � _ • � 278/96-103 / / / / / PHONE: (714)639-9860 �'Pow / - - - - - - - - / ;0 dl PROJECT V o�� / / / � / / BOUNDARY I � � �I SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM / / / / '� / / W / / / / z�� / / RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL � / / / / / � o� / ,/ � � EXISTING HOUSING I / �o/ I �' �° (SOUTH OF LOT 9) I °�� co ZONING: ZONING I / / / / fi / ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS HERITAGE O z SPECIFIC PLAN OF FONTANA TRACT NO. 15711-1 , // // // / % / LL SCALE: 1 "=80' M.B. 278/96-103 LL Q LL , TRACT NO. 16317 0 80 160 240 M.B. 307/48-53 ♦ , - ♦ FOOTHILL-BOULEVARD- am an _ Now* k SU -01 MADOLE9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 PHONE: 909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE � . . 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE300, IRVINE, CA92612 144 NORTH ORANGEST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Q ❑01❑ArmmFm Or❑❑❑❑ (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 �®®o® � oomd=1 o ❑r®❑ooro®o®❑oo Aroo®o®Or0000❑ SITE UTILIZATION PLAN 1 Q FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES W W W J O Z D Q W W TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 VICTORIA PARK co Q U Q W Q >_ IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIAUj Of W W W W' U � z 2 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK "Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. Q > ¢ BASELINE ROAD 0 JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT w APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT w W CHURCH �m Y } R ET MILLER a Uj w .. = ; AVENUE PROJECT m 0- SINGLE FAMILY - , O Q W. LIBERTY FOOTHILL BLVD PKWY RESIDENTIAL 0# GABAY CT EXISTING ZONING: 15 HERITAGE SPECIFIC /' / ARROW ROUTE PLAN OF FONTANA WHITTRAM �LROLINKMET TRACT NO. 15958 ,/ // FONTANA MOTOR M.B. 271/89.92 /' // � , � VICINITY MAP SPEEDWAY w ' ACT NO. 15711-1 M.B. 0000 aft278/96-103 / 00 ' 0000 � DEVELOPER/OWNER Sy\/ANER "f I TRACT NO. 15958 M.B. 271/89-92 /' i' 2�D�ppNIT HOMES SUITE 300 LOT 2 A BRUS CT. TRACT NO. 15711-1 M.B. /� �/' /' IRVINE, CA92612 BLOCK "Y" M.B 2/24 , 278/96-103 / / �/ CONTACT I w // / / PHONE:(949)883-1554 > /' �' /' CIVIL ENGINEER: Q AUGUSTA ,/ , II_ � �/ , / / MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. WAY /' ,/ 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230 cn w RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 / / /` /' CONTACT MARK BERTONE I w /// /,/ / / PHONE: (909)481-6322 VIA VENETO DR. ' � ' ARCHITECT ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. ORNAGE, CA 92866 CONTACT- PHONE: (714)639-9860 Q TRACT NO. Q`L 15711-2 M.B. 279/1_5 �� ♦ CORTEZ CT. J I TRACT NO. 18096 M.B. n I LOW MEDIUM RES. � , I 336/5-7Uj � HOUSING ZONING , �� ' �' ��PS /' u z U z O I LOW MEDIUM RES. HOUSING ,� /' PROJECT / ' U Qf I w � � ZONING �,� � ,� BOUNDARY Q w SINGLE FAMILY / RESIDENTIAL O /' EXISTING � � ��P `�°�� i' ' i' � ' � �' ZONING:°e Q��P ' I �' ' � HERITAGE TRACT NO. SPECIFIC PLAN - /' �' ' OF FONTANA SCALE: 1 "=80' I 15711-2 ' TRACT N0. 15711 1 M.B. I / J�� , � � , � o so 160 240 M.B. 279/1-5 278/96-103 i PROJECT BOUNDARY ' 4 ' GARCIA DR. ♦ LOW MEDIUM RES. HOUSING ZONING .w SEE SHEET SU 01 SU -02 M.A.((( DO, L E 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 PHONE:909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 CD STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Q ❑01❑ArmFUF�M Or❑❑❑❑ (949) 883- 1554 (71 4) 639-9860 0®mo®o 11 rAoorodomdo oo=tl M1 0 ❑r®❑❑Or❑®LIED❑❑❑Ar0❑®0®0r0000❑ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP =0 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES a Z) w w � Z � � J w Z Z TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 VICTORIA PARK J Q < } LN❑ w � z IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA w o w a w w co BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK "Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. o > Q w JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT BASELINE ROA❑ APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT Q w CHUR CH R MILLER �,7 Y wu w } z AENUm o w PROJECT a- O Q W LIBTY PKWY FO o 727 3 1 1915 15 ARROW ROUTE L 7215E +121&7 Y� +1275i 1115 1275E WHITTRAM 4METROLINK 12251+ 121 B FONTANA MOTOR + 12128 SPEEDWAY 1212J !1 J2,2B VICINITY MAP + /2'+ j NOT TO SCALE L3 + 127� I 12243 + O 1217. Y TT $1-4 + +17112,a5 0 12253 / /+,2,27 NOTES 127aB UTILITY COMPANIES 1117.E +,209.8 127a. ° /ty 12118 ^ry 1- PRESENT CONING: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL WATER/SEWER: � +'2aos 1 ./ # I ❑❑ LAN❑ USE PROPOSED ❑CON❑OMINIUM/ 1277.7 ❑E❑ICATE❑ / + 'a COMMERCIAL CUCAMONGA I ALLEY WATER Q / / 3❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 11 A4 GROSS ACRES❑ ❑ISTRICT R/W J +f 4 +,2883/ '+ ' 4❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 5�4 NET ACRES❑ WEST ,22014 +285 �' / +,2w 5� THIS SITE CONSISTS OF 1 NUMBERE❑ LOT P:O:: All 1138 STREET R/W EAST R/W / ❑❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 1 LETTEREI I LOT PCO�O❑ C38 �• �Q5 N /1+7 / f20581 12% ❑❑ SEWAGE ISPOSAL CUCAMONGA FALLEY RANCHO CUCAMONGA❑CAC91❑119' h 00 ' / WATER ❑ISTRICT❑ PHONE: 1909 1981 111591 10❑ IMPRO❑EMENTS BY SEPARATE PLANS EIOT A PART OF THIS PROEECT❑ ^titi O, +'�" 8❑ E❑ISTING IMPEREIOUS AREA 0[0 ACRES❑ +O D�ti`1cb0" / 207.2 ( 91 PROPOSEu IMPERJIOUS AREA 3LLLACRES GAS,: ^ry 72%8 1217.6 l 4' 11715, 1❑TO 30' CL 1 LI TO 41' 11715, ✓ +� �` ° / J + / +, B SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO❑ � Qo � / 20Q5 (4 15 STREET CHINO❑CA91 ❑19 5L5711' 8' OWNER ❑E❑ELOPER 9091 1131531/ 2 PARKWAY PARKING g z0 ZO PARKWAY �� /f22053 + \z�J STRATHAM HOMES 915' 515' p Q 0'/5 5' 5�' 4' S� / ,ti°� ' +tee 125.9 In --01 DUPONT ❑R SUITE 300 TELEPHONE: U O �' �P+ / , + IR IINE CA 91 11 PROP EC AC E-LAC H (�) ' 5 / e +12M5 27R7 /0 120 MARSHALL CONTACT: FRONTIER P-MNT CURB P-MNT U U +1J +12215 0�� / 4, 1400 E-PHILLIPS BL❑❑�OMONA CA 91❑❑C 2_ 7% —7 �2 +1�� + \� / / �49-883�554 OFFICE B CT. e 72°7J P• •• 122,.7 vP Q / ,� + � ATTN: �RRY PAUBEL 1=111 I I-III-III 11, I l l 1=111=111=1 I=A 11-111 ;III-III-III-III-III-III=_____ 1-III-III 11-III-;;11' 0� + + a B 1205 PHONE: '�09❑4 C9❑r354 I I I 11=1 1=1 11=1 -i 1= �_ _�I I—1 I- II I ;I II I I I I-1 I—1 1-1 I—III—III—I 11- I—I 1=1 Q' G 12927 1-1 I I i I-1 1—I 11 CI 1= =1 =� IT1=� I- IT1 ITI, ,1' 1 ,fir-c� �� ' ° ; 55 C I ❑I L ENGINEER =i =111=1�1=i11 PROP❑CURB ❑GUTTER E❑❑CURB ❑ GUTTER — + J j-, Q`° / ,2=7 PROP E❑❑ o `` 1202 �P + + MA❑OLE ❑ ASSOCIATES❑INC❑ SI❑EWALK SI❑EWALK /2'SB+ +oQ� '�°'B / / / t CONSULTING CI❑IL ENGINEERS❑ ELECTRIC: ,11Rf „s5 ' �� / SO❑CALIFORNIA E❑ISON COMPANY EAST AVENUE + , 5 �P`7 QQ + o ti' PLANNERS AND SUR❑EYORS TYPICAL STREET SECTION + O J +72025 '05' , 4 CO 12tl W 951 REI IWOOI AI IENUE FONTANAI CAI 9 33 J2, ' / �� O �� ,2�2 / zo~5+ + .7 Mo O RA PITTSBURGH AI IEN A SUITE 30 /109 `� � � � RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91 L30 PHONE: I�09 j8L0L5598 UNuERGROUNu NTS / OJ p��'�P + f+7 / PHONE: [909❑8C515100 TRANSMISSIONS +12155 p o / 3: 3 Z CONTACT: MARK BERTONE En `n W E909❑481 Z3-E-❑ 1 CO PHONE: =13❑C3Cd 1133 PIPELINES +1193B \ E--�--�Z--- >❑d-❑I7❑ZL- PHONE: 1909❑35C�C33 DISTRIBUTION +1113s 121I.5 �j / , 9 / O 0 I / 0 +/1Q0.3 �o° ❑ ❑ / / + / o 0 0 ,203E CONTACT: ISAAC OMINGUE 2 s "°�' + " B �`� / 'P + �Z z z Q ARCHITECT / p / / / 2077 �� PHONE 909❑930�5❑❑ EMAIL: 11 1 11 d❑❑®❑❑❑m =®❑ +/1 ARCHITECTS ORANGE f59 / ° / /�G�Q�� / / / ` _ v, 144 NORTH ORANGE STI + 77%4 5 / 4 / y + 11%. / /�� GO tS�' / / 1 ,.4 Q �_� Q ORANGE CA9 8�❑ /� 5 `� / +tea — CONTACT: + 12M 7 y J c PPr \ W 1207..5 / 12757ON) / „%5 11.7 \ / �O V/ // \ +' �14-_39 98-0 + W // + 101.4 O CF) , + D , 12a7.5 \ 12°35 0 c 5 �0 AC ❑ °° vo z 720a5 + I + o + , ' / 11%J s / 720.i1 / O 1197.E / IM7 I 1101.8 1 4' 11 7 1' °O LA N / 720a1 3 II/ 975 1J97.8 1207.J / 1211. / +72015 / / PROJECT BENCHMARK "965 "+ +11 77°aB W J ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS. DATUM PER THE + 'tee ,SB n FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONC.TOWER BASE STAMPED 5 ❑4 AC ❑ � I V "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10046 1987"ON EASTERLY SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL / +71955 / +"%� / +11%B 11+ 12oa8 I 5 9&.I BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA TOWER NO.223. / 1,96E 11999 +,1023 7202 202 / + +719f.5 119I.7 / +J1g�`B/ + +I797s o n% BASIS OF BEARINGS 12�J ' � V — — ——— ——— — + O � f79�Fi— � � J20I.3 / v + / A +Q +J795-— �l ,197z O 1zo1. THE BEARING OF N 89°11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD. AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TR. 15711-2, l �l 12°K5 MBC9/1:- + L❑ �N89 56'00" 6E 51.08 1797.5 "% • N89°56 E680.51' +�2 +»9v- SCALE: 1 "=80' UNDERGROUND SER❑ICE ALERT 811 "SP9945 ''9s N89°56'01"E 684.51.;5, +"g''` 1200 ,199.7 3 » 0 0 80 160 240 320 / 1197.{ +1795J + l+5 77%B /l 11+B +1191.5 +1182.B u •4••• +119R6 +11%7 119RI LINE TABLE I N ❑E❑ MAP TTM LO 1 LINE ❑ LENGTH ❑IRECTION SCALE: 1"=80' L1 9539, N21° 05' 02.96"E MADOLE NOTE TABLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 LE 94 I N89° 56' 01.22"E LTR. DESCRIPTION ; • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 L3 4 00' N89° 58'44.99"E �A AN EASEMENT RESERVE HEREON FOR INGRESS/EGRESS PURPOSES PHONE: 909.481.6322 L4 5F-1' N44° 27' 59.69"E © ADDITIONAL DEDICATION TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑Arm®=Or❑❑❑❑ (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 O® EEI ®O®oo®d�d 1111 oOdOOOrr ooOd®oEIEI Or®O OOrO®O®O 00 AroO®O®Or00000 SEE SHEET TTM-03 w 210 DEVELOPER/OWNER J w 1202.E / + + / // , // i 1 STRATHAM FIONES m Q z LU Z 1220.5 + / 1 01.8 /�' , / / 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 ICTORIA PARK L . Q Q / / , / // n12 + I IRVINE,CA 92612 L Q z w ¢ ww � w1220.4 / / 205.E CONTACT �, oof z =/ IPHONE:(949)883-1554 a c� ¢ 0 6.5 I ' / /+ / I I CIVIL ENGINEER: BASELINE ROAD 1202.5 1201.4 Q / I I MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES WC. a ,1 0 I I �04• 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE,SUITE 230 w w+O / 1202.5 //1205.7/+ / 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 ¢ CHURCH STREET �'a } o+ / / 1203 4 1209.7 cn CONTACT-MARK BERTONE MILLER mYo 4.5 + I PHONE:(909)481 6322 w AVENUE PROJECT w Z GPgv� / / + / o M 1 1204.5 w W. LIBERTY + / 02.7 / , / // c ARCHITECT r P ri ��'�� // a // + / ,/ / // o o ARCHITECTS ORANGE 0 FOOTHILL BLVD PKWY S. P �� p�e // / / I I 1 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. G �, / f- ; L, I I ORNAGE,CA 92866 15 o o CONTACTS o o ARROW ROUTE CDCDI PHONE:(714)639-9860 1203.3 ��P ,lj / / / C) z o z I �2JI4.5 �� / GotSQ pqp• // // //// / // 1203.E WHITTRAM / I/ // // +1202 9// + 1200.3 1201.9 $" WATER METROLINK + �o + / 0 / (� �`L� / / / 8" FIRE WATER �1 03 FONTANA MOTOR SPEEDWAY � O + 11993 OQ' // /// '� // 24 HDPE I VICINITY MAP 1200.5 /�`� / / , / // / STORM DRAIN I Q UTILITY PROVIDERS I 8 SEWER 7207.7 I FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 1200.7 / // / a ,/ /�' `� --- -- ' -- _-_ - I I (844)891 2482 PROJECT BENCHMARK: / / / // _ 120 . I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF / j / // / h I 12 3.3 + P.O.BOX 3003 RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS. DATUM PER / + // / + REDLANDS,CA 92373 THE FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN 1200.7 // // � � - ---_--- - 1 (800)427 2200 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONC.TOWER BASE STAMPED CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - � "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 1004E 1987"ON EASTERLY // 0 / g�'� / / �� / / I I 1 10440 ASHFORD STREET SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL / / / P� / / P.O.BOX 638 / // / y� 1 I BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA / + 1 8.4 / + / Pta/ / 1 �� 12b1.4 8 1 1 2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91729 TOWER N0.223. + /1�200. 1 / / pe�`Q / / _ ------- ,- 1 1 (909)987-2591 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT BASIS OF BEARINGS t I 1 700 N.MORENO AVE. 1199.7 / / / I I LAVERNE,CA91750 THE BEARING OF N 89'11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD. +1203.8 (909)593-7474 AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TRI 1151 11 1 II M BI II 19/1151 I / 11200.7 / �� / \ 1 1 12 2.4 + /� // 5.60 AC. / +119 .5 / / /,/ GPI\ // �' / I 4' I I SPECTRUM / I / 1 /w ,/ / / / , �� (888)892-2253 NOTES: + / / // �OJ / /// / 1202.5\ I 1203.5 I i SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY / / / + + 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE 1. PRESENT ZONING:COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL / / / 1200.5 N FONTANA,CA.92336 2. LAND USE PROPOSED-CONDOMINIUM/ � I 1 1 129�i ,°° // 1198.3 +/ // 9.4 // O + (909)665-4555 3. THIS SITE CONTAINS COMMERCIAL I I I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICPAL UTILITIES 4. THIS SITE CONTAINS 11.44 GROSSET ACRES. / 1198.5 1197 6 // / // / S. 11198 7 // / �/ I 1203.4 1 1 1201. 5 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. 5. THIS SITE CONSISTS OF 1 NUMBERED LOT + I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 6. THIS SITE CONTAINS 1 LETTERED LOT / / 1199.4 + / , �• / / �� I I 1 10 (909)919-2612 7. SEWAGE DISPOSAL CUCAMONGA VALLEY + I I I I WATER DISTRICT. V 1' 8. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.0 ACRES. � I I I 9. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.76 ACRES. 1200.5 I I �Y197.5 / / / 119781/ �/9 // D // /// / + / � I + I I 1 1 W 1198.E w 1196.8 / 1 V oQ � II 1 i I I Z / / 00 6 w w LLINE TABLE „�P�� EASEMENT AND DEDICATION+/ / / / , 1196.5, + < LL w W l" Q. LL = O U) I cn I I LINE ❑ LENGTH ❑IRECTION LTR. DESCRIPTION OQ Off' + 5.74 AC. O0 0 U) � I S 1 I ° A AN EASEMENT RESERVE HEREON FOR INGRESS/EGRESS PURPOSES 1201.3 + // // / �cLD�� 11 I I I I L1 95139' N21 05 02.96E 0 1195.6 // / +// //\� // 5��5� i 1 1 VJ L❑ 9141 ' N89° 56' 01.22"E © ADDITIONAL DEDICATION TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / 1195.E // / // \Y �/ / � I I I 1 Mtn Q L3 4100' N89° 58'44.99"E +1195.5 ,l, O /// // / // / // + 1200.8 I I I �� 1 1 1 may" Li.l L4 5Q1' N44° 27' 59.69"E / P ,/ / // +1196.8 1197.E I i 200.5 1 1 1119 .4 // +1195.6 / CD I il + I If, CONC I I 1 119 .9 7 1196.6 I I 1202.3 1194.5 1194.7 / + 8" FIRE WATER I I I I -7 - 8" WATER p I B I 199. 24" HDPE i III TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1199.7 I 1 I FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES , \ STORM DRAIN 1��/ 8 SEWER � 4 Q194.7 / �7795-� ----------- ---------------- ------- ----- + i 1204.3 -- _ _ _ I I TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 i 1201. I"" - + I IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA S s - s s I + 1 I I BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK"Y"OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. i l 119,�4 / l // 11954. - - �� ------- ------------------ ---- -- - ------- ------ I 1 JUNE, 2018 11.44ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT 1194.9// 1200.1� � APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT 198.511 11119 . L❑ N89°56'00"E 651.08' 1197.5 1 I / N89°56'00"E 680.51' � 1 N89°56'01"E 684.51' 2 + 1 002 1199.6 I I II I ASPH ,JC`�J^ 1196.4 1199.4 L3 12Qo 1 i / l 1194.5 + 9 9.9.9. 7 1198. 1 I I J TTM 10 11 v `r) MADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 PHONE: 909.481.6322 SCALE: 1 "=30' Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 0 30 60 90 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑Arm®=Or❑❑❑❑ (9 4 9) 8 8 3- 15 5 4 (714) 6 3 9-9 8 6 0 EE-TEE-l o®oo®lFlr [E11KLUI E11 000d®000 ❑r®❑ooro®o®❑oo Aroo®o®Or0000❑ 210 DEVELOPER/OWNER w STRATHAM FKAES `>" o w LU > / 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 0 ¢ Z ¢ "' VICTORIA PARK LN 00 w f IRVINE,CA 92612 Y ¢ c w a w / 12 .�1 CONTACT- w w w �� / / I PHONE:(949)883-1554 0 0-1 � � � � 12b \ CIVIL ENGINEER: Q �� 1213.� o BASELINE ROAD +1216.7 + / / 1216.3 1 �� MADOLE AND ASSOC:IATE8, WC. Q 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE,SUITE 230 z w N RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 a CHURCH STREET m a } 1A�'MARK MILLER PROJECT / m PHONE:(909)481-6322 LU AVENUE - Y z 1225.1 ARCHITECT � w cn = W.LIBERTY y�121/1�6 1 ARCHITECTS ORANGE OOTHILL BLVD PKWY s. G 1215.5 / + +4' 1211 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. / 11212.3 121� ORNAGE,CA 92866 1 CONTACT; 15 / / 1 PHONE:(714)639-9860 ARROW ROUTE I /+ 1214.E I WHITTRAM + METROLINK FONTANA MOTOR SPEEDWAY r / 211.3 B I UTILITY PROVIDERS VICINITY MAP 1 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 1224.3 (844)891-2482 O 12�1.16 PROJECT BENCHMARK SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF I P.O.BOX 3003+ RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS. DATUM PER 1211 1 1211 REDLANDS,CA 92373+ 1210.5 THE FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN 1225.5 0 1 +■ (800)427 2200 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONC.TOWER BASE STAMPED 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10046 1987"ON EASTERLY 10440 ASHFORD STREET SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL P.O.BOX 638 / BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91729 12.4 / �' I (909)987 2591 TOWER N0.223. -M 12�0 / ' +1212' 1 , 10�, METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT BASIS OF BEARINGS: 700 N.MORENO AVE. 1227.8 / 1209.8 o 121b.4 LAVERNE,CA 11710 THE BEARING OF N 89°11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD. + Z I 1 (909)593-7474 AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TRI 1151 11 1 II M BI II 19/1151 I SPECTRUM (888)892-2253 NOTES: 1209.5 i 80UTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY / 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE 1. PRESENT ZONING:COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 7 / / ,209'4 + 1 1 FONTANA,CA.92336 2. LAND USE PROPOSED-CONDOMINIUM/ / 10.4 1 ❑p (909)665-4555 COMMERCIAL / r / 3. THIS SITE CONTAINS 11.44 GROSS ACRES. / I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICPAL UTLITES 4. THIS SITE CONTAINS 5.74 NET ACRES. 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. 5. THIS SITE CONSISTS OF 1 NUMBERED LOT / I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 6. THIS SITE CONTAINS 1 LETTERED LOT ♦ / 1209.4 ' +1208.3 / 1208.5 21 41 (909)919-2612 7. SEWAGE DISPOSAL CUCAMONGA VALLEY / + // + I I WATER DISTRICT. / 1 1 8. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.0 ACRES.+ ♦ / / I I 9. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.76 ACRES. 1229.3 / 1210.6 1 / + I 1222.5 + / 1207.7 1� f 6 12�8 7 + / i' + I I 1229.8 � C3 // / 5 I LINE TABLE EASEMENT AND DEDICATION °QV, o ��P +/ / a LINE ❑ LENGTH ❑IRECTION LTR. DESCRIPTION / R� O, O� / o O R / , '207. I L1 95[39' N21° 05' 02.96"E AN EASEMENT RESERVE HEREON FOR INGRESS/EGRESS PURPOSES 10 5 -60 AC. 1 120 .6 LEI 9141 ' N89° 56' 01.22"E © ADDITIONAL DEDICATION TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1206.8 / I L3 4100' N89° 58'44.99"E 1229.8 ,o / C:3 / + 1 9.6 1 W 120 6 L4 5Q1' N44° 27' 59.69"E 1206.3 V 222 6 `�� / 1208.6 / I �` / + + +/1205/4 +/ / / /' r 07.7 / 10 % �P� 1 co TENTATIVE TRACT MAP / 5.3 r e, \ I / + + 12os 8 ,�.��, Q� - 1208 3 // I I I a I FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 1204. O C� W / �� / Qom ' / / I 72 6.9 1221.6 / ' / P� 1 1 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 Q �' / ` IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA �. + / / 1204.4 / � ' 1205.6 / III 1 MARSHAL BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK"Y"OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 1204.5 �Q- o + 7210.7 r 1� I I JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT 1221.j �221 5 ' + o�o / r -= I I CT. APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT /1227 3. / /' ��o� / / // , / � 4, I 1207.3 1 I 1 / 21./.Z/ +1203.5 �CiP 1205.6 / 1206.4 B II + o � I I � TTM L03 1202.7 ti o o I I 12 5.5 � + 120 3 ' 120�� // '/ ' MADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE. SUITE 230 1202.6 + + / / , z z z I ; • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 > 1220.5 / 1 01.8 �' / 5 .74 AC. 1 nnn /+ /r / + / /� �/ // // / + I /� �� 3 Engineering Communities for Life FAX:CIATFS, INC. 909.481.6320 SEE SHEET TTM-02 SCALE: 1 =30 0 30 60 90 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑Arm®=Or❑❑❑❑ T Tom o®oo o'o moo'®[loom®mxi oU od o•mm (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 0®0®0®000®rodo d 1111 ood�or�000d o or®o ooro®o®o 0o Aroo®o®Or00000 0 1 Q w w LU J m Zz w > w LEGEND: VICTORIA PARK � LU Q o LN. w g U) F- ¢ } 1213 of 0 C) LU 00 II DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY ��+1216 +� 2163 V v v Q J v MAXWELL IV INJECTION WELL `5' o > BASELINE ROAD + 21.6 12155 I I W / + 2 JQ DA DRAINAGE AREA 2,2j I NOTES: PROJECT BENCHMARK:12126 N U SF SQUARE FEET 2,4610� Cn + ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS. DATUM PER THE w w CHURCH m Y } o CF CUBIC FEET /3 TOTAL WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AREA =268,160 SF 6.2 AC ~ a ( ) ET MILLER Lu t- DCV DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME / I o FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONC.TOWER BASE STAMPED w z Lu Y o IMPERVIOUS RATIO 224 �J' O 21 EXISTING SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA=0 SF(0 /o) w AVENUE 00 0- IMP z �i PROPOSED SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA-214,528 SF(80%) "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10046 1987"ON EASTERLY SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL O Q PR JET - QQQ Qbmp WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE + +121 21°.5 fl I 2,,4 BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA TOWER NO.223. � W. LIBERTY ,2255 PzYR-1HR-0.552 IN ,24 / I BASIS OF BEARINGS FOOTHILL BLVD PKWY IJLIIJ +1212.7 1 to ♦ 122].B 1209.E 121p 4 ,]6 + I o THE BEARING OF N 89°11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD.AS 15 SCALE. 1 "=80' / 2°95 / LIST OF LID B M P S SHOWN ON MAP OF TR. 15711-2, M.B. 279/1-5. ARROW ROUTE 7 + 2 94 0 80 160 240 320 -F / + O4 I E STORM DRAIN STENCIL: "NO DUMPING WE LIVE DOWNSTREAM"OR CITY APPROVED APN: 1100 Ell 91104 94 / +12°85// ' ) T EQUAL TO DISCOURAGE HARMFUL AND ILLEGAL DUMPING. WHITTRAM 2°+ +� / I METROLINK 12293 ! +12106 I _ FLOGARD CATCH BASIN FILTER: THE CATCH BASIN FILTER WILL REMOVE A MAJORITY /1222. ° F2] OF TRASH AND DEBRIS FROM THE STORM WATER RUNOFF BEFORE IT REACHES THE FONTANA MOTOR � m + 6 2 ' PROPOSED UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. SPEEDWAY 1229E 21112 2°.5 I VICINITY MAP WATER QUALITY BMP MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE / ° 2 0 ❑ MAXWELL PLUS PRIMARY SETTLING CHAMBER: THE DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME WILL BMP MAINTENANCE FREQUENCY +O 20,6 i3 INITIALLY ENTER THE PRETREATMENT CHAMBER. THE CHAMBER WILL HAVE A 10.0' CLEARING AND 12299 o 6 SUMP DEPTH WHERE TRASH, DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENTS WILL SETTLE AT THE BOTTOM. A MAXWELL VACUUMING OF 2x/YEAR AND FLOATING SPONGE WILL REMOVE POLLUTANTS FROM THE WATER'S SURFACE. INTAKE SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS SCREENS WILL FURTHER FILTER THE WATER BEFORE IT ENTERS THE CONNECTION PLUS AFTER MAJOR PIPE TO THE ADJACENT INJECTION WELL. DRAINAGE WITHIN STORAGE AREA RAIN EVENTS SYSTEMS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS / %+ 2 j +12 MAXWELL PLUS INJECTION WELL: THE INJECTION WELL WILL DRAIN AND INFILTRATE 221,6 �, / /�� I WATER QUALITY RUNOFF THROUGH A VERTICAL GRAVEL PIT. THE DEPTH OF THE REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT °56 GRAVEL PIT WILL VARY PER SYSTEM BASED ON VOLUME TO BE INFILTRATED (SEE AND DEBRIS FROM 2x/YEAR AND DA1 / 12 I�I + DETAIL HEREON). CATCH BASIN FILTER PER AFTER MAJOR 223, TREATMENT AREA = 268,160 SF (6.2 AC.) I I FILTERS MANUFACTURER'S RAIN EVENTS + °IMPERVIOUSNESS = 0.80 (80%) 1205 I WATER QUALITY MITIGATION SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME = 21,487 CF (0.49 AC-FT) � 12 I ' f 1STORM WATER RUNOFF AND NUISANCE FLOWS FROM THE PROJECT SITE WILL BE INTERCEPTED BY Modified Maxwell Plus Drainage System Detail And Specifications • QBMP - 1.1 CFS V 5 AREA DRAINS AND CATCH BASINS THROUGHOUT THE SITE. BEFORE THE WATER LEAVES THE + / / / 1204 I ' I PROJECT SITE A DIVERSION MANHOLE WILL INTERCEPT THE LOW FLOW WATER QUALITY RUNOFF RESPONSIBLE PARTY 15' MIN.CHAMBER SEPARATION 12,58 ,220 ,22°5+� °� ' / / + '018 ` ° I AND ROUTE IT INTO TWO TORRENT RESOURCES MAXWELL PLUS DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. THE FOR MAINTENANCE 244 / 1 1 1 1u 3 300 19 18 u 5 4 30"0 3 P P/1D +85 �i + _ I I SYSTEMS PRIMARY SETTLING CHAMBER WILL REMOVE DEBRIS, TRASH, OILS,AND POLLUTANTS +12925 12°1.4+ , 1203- j � I 04 FROM THE RUNOFF BEFORE ROUTING CLEAN WATER INTO ADJACENT VERTICAL INJECTION WELL. & INSPECTIONS: 2°J4 EACH INJECTION WELL WILL HAVE 45 VERTICAL FEET OF INFILTRATION IN ORDER TO MITIGATE STRATHAM HOMES w maw w co i 2°45 THE SITE'S DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME. LL w P 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 E:EL z NOTES: IRVINE, CA 92612 1. ALL SOILS GROUP A m a 121J5 4.3 / - TREATMENT AREA BOUNDARY I 2. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF INFILTRATION SYSTEMS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON RESULTS OF = The ® $ F- Maxwell Plus =` I FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. o z � \ Manufactured and Installed by � "°°'� 1200 1.0'CONTOURS I TORRENT RESOURCES i 9 w 2°' ,ti h o / I Q An evolution of McGuckin Drilling � o \ / 33 uwi w a J 0 b L0 www.torrentresources.com = _ >- z Z = ARIZONA 602/268-0785 3 0 10 12139 EXIST. 1.0'CONTOURS / O - I Q NEVADA 7021366-1234 Z / + / ti° D, n9a.4` - ofCALIFORNIA 661/947-9836 Liu W � / 2 _ > LU u) 13 n 1 F- IT 1➢9J.6 ,. + OIL I > 1198.5 / \ I 2➢. N / 119761212,6 + + / � EL PROP. FIRE WA "o / r IL-L PROP. DOMESTIC WATERLu - 13 / 9]5 I + o / +12°55 LL��' MAXWELL INJECTION WE Q 3 0 1196-8 -1 PROP.STORM DRAIN _� 1199_6 �%\\ S LL INJECTION WELL 1a z 2°59 1201.3 + �g5 �9 PROP.SEWER 956A + MAXWELI PR AR S TLING CHAMBER MAXWELL PRIMARY SETTLING CHAMBER 13 0 1195 � l � I 1200 I "994 I � ITEM NUMBERS 1s 1 2+ SYSTEM 1 c c - ' - ,�'� - - 21 +,2°2 °2 / , • n 1 I I 19 9 L LJ 00 L 1 I I 8"PVC CONNECTOR PIPE S=0.010 ,zo23 @ 1. MANHOLE CONE JMOLIFIE .FLAT BOTTOM) ROP. FIRE WATER PROP. DOMESTIC TER ro „ SYSTEM 2 I I W PROP. V T�R I I 2. STABILIUEu BACKFILL -TWO SACK SLURRY MI_u AZ Lic. R00070465 A, R00047067 B-4, ADWR 363 o � 7�9 �y � � I \/�/ W CA Lic. 528080, C-42, HAZ. T 0 3. BOLTEI RING GRATE/COI M I ER ON R I SHOWN( CLEAN CAST IRON WITH WORT ZING"STORM WATER ONLY"IN RAISE( LETTERS( NV Lic. 0035350 A - NM Lic. 90504 GF04 ATII I L_ - - -1 ELEVATION±0 02'OFOPLANS. SECURE( TO CONE WITH MORTAR( RIM U.S. Patent No. 4,923,330 - Trademark 1974, 1990, _ 44 1 ` I PROP. STORM DRAIN 2004 L_ 19 GRAE BASIN OR PAING BY OTHERS - PROP.SEWER 8" PVC CONNECTOR PIPE @ S=0.010 4. NOTE: F-RAWING NOT TO SCALE 0 ti I 5. COMPACTED BASE MATERIAL FEY OTHERSFIf RAINAGE 1, 93.3 + 9S 5 MAN O E WITH DIVERSIONSYSTEMHOEWITH LOW FLOW SOILS I ,1945 6. PUREFLOO EBRIS SHIEL ROLLE 1 GA STEEL 4"LENGTH WITH 5. MIN.4' HAFT RILLE T MAINTAIN PERMEABILITY F + 1>9 5 " DI ERSION OW FLO VERN WQ 4 + 11 ns4.s + I I „a.6 IN ERT TQ WQ 5YS EM I IENTEI ANTIISIPHON AN I INTERNAL 5 MA I SWO FLATTENEI 16. FABRIC SEAL -iUULRESISTANT GEOTE-iTILE TO BE REMO''E' BY EUPANUEL STEEL SCREEN -1 1 L"LENGTHu FUSION BON-iEL EPO-iY CUSTOMER AT PROTECT COMPLETIONFI ;❑Q: I COATEC-I n+ 92s +n „gs,4 94.s + +11975 I 17. ABSORBENT FIHYFIROPHOBIC PETROCHEMICAL SPONGE-iMINFl1 F-8 O-iFI n935 7. PRECAST LINER L4000 PSI CONCRETE 48"IuuO 54"OL110ENTER IN CAPACITY(ITYPICAL.TWO I II I PER CHAMBER( LL+ 9zs + HOLE AND ALIGN SECTIONS TO MAEIMIOE BEARING SURFACE L 95 18. CONNECTOR PIPE-6"0 SCH.40 PVC. IT III&L SYSTEM 1 : 8. MIN.6'0 DRILLED SHAFT 19. uENTE-i ANTILSIPHON INTAKE WITH FLOW REGULATOR SCALE: 1"=20' SYSTEM 2. 9. SUPPORT BRACKET (FORME 111 IGAI STEEL(IFUSION BONI IEI EPOI IY COATEC-1 20. INTAKE SCREEN -4"0 SCH.40 PVC 0.120"MODIFIED SLOTTED WELL SCALE: 1"=20' SCREEN WITH 3ESLOTS PER ROW/FTL48"OLERALL LENGTH WITH TRIG 10. O-iERFLOW PIPE FiSCHF40 P-iC MATEC TO -iRAINAGE PIPE AT BASE ENL CAPL SEALL 21. FREEBOAR I IEPTH IARIES WITH INLET PIPE ELIE IATIONI I INCREASE 11. -IRAINAGE PIPE F1AFS HIGHWAY GRA-1E WITH TRI-A COUPLERn PRIMARY/SECON IARY SETTLING CHAMBER I IEPTHS AS NEE( E I TO 00 DEVELOPER/OWNER: SUSPENI PIPE I URING BACKFILL OPERATIONS TO FREI ENT BUCKLING MAINTAIN ALL INLET PIPE ELEI IATIONS ABO IE CONNECTOR PIPE � NO DUMPING OR BREAKAGE IIAMETERASNOTEIII OCERFLOWC w STRATHAM HOMES 12. BASE SEAL -iGEOTE-iTILE-POLY LINER OR CONCRETE SLURRYu 22. 8"PEC INLET PIPE :BY OTHERS® Gutters C W Q M P BMP AS- BUILT CERTIFICATE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 13. ROCK uCLEAN AN Li WASH ELi 3/8"TO 1 Ll/L1'AGGREGATELi 23. NONOIVOEEN GEOTELTILE SLEEEEDMIRAFI 140 NIL.MIN.6 FT 0,HELD IRVINE,CA 92612 APPRO II 110 FEET OFF THE BOTTOM OF E CAI IATION I Q/Q 14. FLOFAST® r-RAINAGE SCREEN SCH 40 Pr-C 0-1 r0"SLOTTEr-WELL N I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NECESSARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE CONTACT SCREEN WITH 3-iSLOTS PER Row/FTu_IAMETER LiARIES 9LT ouERALL 24. EIGHT 18-i1QL5" IAMETER HOLES PER FOOT WHERE NOTE(II I �r DEVICES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND ARE FUNCTIONAL TO THE BEST OF MY PHONE:(949)883 1554 LENGTH WITH TRI B couPLERn 3 hose Downsfream KNOWLEDGE AS OF THE DATE BELOW. CIVIL ENGINEER PWQMP-01 ; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230 SIGNATURE DATE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 �, WE LIVE DOWN STREAM CONTACT MARK BERTONE MADOLE PHONE: (909)481-6322 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 1 STORM DRAIN STENCIL: "NO DUMPING WE LIVE DOWNSTREAM" OR CITY ; •CIATI RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 APPROVED EQUAL TO DISCOURAGE HARMFUL AND ILLEGAL DUMPING. INC PHONE: 909.481.6322 1 00 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 9096481.6320 Q a DATE: 05-1 1 -2018 ` CD WESTBURY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 0 Q to w STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE IM m 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c ❑01❑Arm®=Or❑❑❑❑ �2 (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 o®moo®oo❑o ❑d ❑Ero fir o❑❑d ® V) ❑❑®❑❑❑❑❑®•®d❑m®EIEII�dEr❑❑m Q ❑r=o❑❑r❑®o®❑❑❑Ar❑❑®❑®Or❑❑❑❑❑ ~ to J CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 210 PROJECT BENCHMARK: FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES z ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS. DATUM PER THE J > LU TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONC.TOWER BASE STAMPED m Q w"CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10046 1987"ON EASTERLY SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL VICTORIA PARK LN.Y Q � z Q } BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA TOWER NO.223. IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA L o o z co w U c of _j w w 2 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK "Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. Q co - — o JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT BASELINE ROAD BASIS OF BEARINGS: APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT w � V THE BEARING OF N 89'11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD.AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TR. 15711-2, M.B.279/1-5. a CHURCH STREET j , o w 4AVENUE PROJECT LLER uj J Z w = W.LIBERTY �yy, PKWY S. OOTHILL BLVD ( J 15 I / ARROW ROUTE Ii ii 1 I Ali I IIII Ike // III I li / WHITTRAM AVENUE II IIF n1 h METROLINK w / III I k FONTANA MOTOR SPEEDWAY / Iiii1 I + VICINITY MAP I I 1,a 6 1 , %o� Z/ +,,6 +/ NOTES: , + I PLJ + 121 60 1211 N 6, 0 -MIXED USE. DEVELOPER/OWNER 1. PRESENT ZONING:COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL / + I 3. THIS SITE CONNTAIINSD11.44 GROSS ACRES. STRATHAM I DES 4. THIS SITE CONTAINS 5.74 NET ACRES. I 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 5. THIS SITE CONSISTS OF 1 NUMBERED LOT I / IRVINE,CA 92612 6. THIS SITE CONTAINS 1 LETTERED LOT a ,o 7. SEWAGE DISPOSAL CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER + CONTACT DISTRICT. PHONE:(949)883-1554 8. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.0 ACRES. +"°9.5 9. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 3.76 ACRES. II CML ENGINEER: 10. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 5.74 ACRES. I ) 11. ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY + 6,400 MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. MANAGEMENT AGENCY(FEMA)FLOOD INSURANCE + 06 I I 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE,SUITE 230 RATE MAP(FIRM)PANEL 06071C8635J,THE ENTIRE °» - PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE X,AREA / + z°3 6 _+ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 CONTACT-MARK BERTONE OF REDUCED FLOOD RISK DUE TO LEVEE. PHONE:(909)481-6322 ABBREVIATIONS: ARCHITECT + I AC ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ARCIi1ECT8 ORANGE CB CATCH BASIN + 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. CL CENTERLINE +6 / Po + ,p +11058 +l�3 I h 9 ------ ORNAGE,CA 92866 FS FINISHED SURFACE 6,200 I ,J ,'10a5 +12056 N 6,200 CONTACT- R/W - RIGHT OF WAY + T o I ------ PHONE:(714)639-9860 RW RECLAIMED WATER +1223 /� TC TOP OF CURB / °+ O 6 / i °� PP POWER POLE °' +°" /' I I I UTILITY PROVIDERS SD STORM DRAIN SS SEWER + D >° FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS '+B5 0.4 / o� I ° + �°„+ o I (844)891-2482 LEGEND: / I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. EX GAS EXISTING GAS LINE o I °° I P.O.BOX 3003 REDLANDS,CA 92373 EX TELE EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE �� -- (800)427 2200 EX SD 60 EXISTING STORM DRAIN N 6,000 60 �' CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT EX 12 EXISTING WATER LINE ,99 10440 ASHFORD STREET P.O.BOX 638 EX SS 21 EXISTING SEWER LINE / 6 +° �� // °� // � �� RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91729 EX SS 21 EXISTING SEWER LINE (909)987-2591 CENTER LINE I METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT 1(y EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 700 N.MORENO AVE. LA VERNE,CA 91750 EXISTING STREET LIGHT (909)593-7474 + EXISTING POWER POLE Wv SPECTRUM D4 EXISTING WATER VALVE / N 5 0 / ' I N 5,800 0 cv / D / (888)892 2253 EXISTING GAS VALVE o / �� »966 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY + 5 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE FONTANA,CA.92336 / +" A ldc ^ (909)665-4555 .may/ 95.j / / „9 9 I RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES „96.6 o I I I F1 ofill 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 06' (909)919 2612 �4� _ _ 7 I N 5,600/ —+ +n99 1 ypp o I I +9s n99v rm +»93. O'y •.• .s a ,+5 < + .s +„9z6 ,9J+ +„96.4 I EARTHWORK QUANTITY ESTIMATE (RAM: 1195 +„g +„9z.3 +»9s5 „+_ — CUT: 7,987 CY FILL: 4,414 CY CG -01 SCALE: 1 "=100' INDEX MAP 0 100 200 300 400 SCALE:1"=100' MADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 PHONE 909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 OiTF TF STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 © 2017 Architects Orange (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 These plans nunare crizeduseisnprotected.Under.These protection unauthorized use is not permitted.These plans shall not be reproduced or used without written permission by Architects Orange. SEE SHEET CG-04 �v, �� / � �� / oo ,� �1. 3 0365FS c/' 04.09FS I I I �o ®� ° oW ° '� ~0 1.28 F �/,/ �Fo ° %�, ° 5 0� O �G Q�� •�° ,�� I III hQP ti� ti `� I I 1112 �3 J ; / ' o �1h S01'y I I I I J 1200. 7 � I I I o c� / // ►. S I I / o /\' \ Low C�Q ona �,� ��U- C9 O cocLc-) 5 CINI �z / �F oo nj ��b cil i��o_ c i ti O g W I t� / � o m oti -J z I % 2° Oti' I � / U I cn Ft / I rV Qt`� �<C �Go O N i W QI �� x >> > O � ,o oti M o ? � 0 2„ o `� I' SCALE: 1 =20 / w Q; I Gj i�r' , s �0 0 20 40 60 80 :n o� w -A z F aN o t- I� ® ti� N 1 oti ,4 J ti ti� �, 12 2. 4 N' = [ � O Q 1 0'�'� 01•' N �o // /i `r ��0 M �►�1 c4i a tzi j �o�Q� o 11 02.60 FF h 1+-I 1 p`1� , o op ��; 01.9 o I 00 o �OQ I off. ❑ � � O . � 2/o / / / y4��Qo P'��Q�� Q, �sto QQ F 000 O� o%c` CD® - XIST.AC IKE o o DEVELOPER OWNER / p>,•°Q 0 0o Qo o ° 1 ° ° ti� ti M �, PROJECT BENCHMARK '� Q \ 2/0 % 2 3.75/0 � O ti ca o / 1� wi O O .O 5 �- I STRATHAM f'I� ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF c . o� O°' Q'S Q' Q� o�cc Q�'' _ 2° 0 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 °'3 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS.DATUM PER m rn / �i Q Q i O �� O O PROP. RI I IRVINE,CA 92612 C�D ?� / ` ' w ^'O Q �� °� "<'' -� C i O O 1 I OQ °O� C90 @• Q 6° E I T. W CONTACT THE FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN / o u'o Q► O1% !`� 0 1`' �� o o c� O�' `�' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONC.TOWER BASE STAMPED Q O i .r / o O 1 PHONE:(949)883-1554 u�• 9 TC rn C9�0 Q� c C� ct?,° � � o\ 2/° ?/o IN o � � BlI11LDl I "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10046 1987"ON EASTERLY �o rn� // ^��` °° �� O°' h o �,� /Wp W F/C 13� C90 E S TBA CIVIL ENGINEER SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL / / � / �° / ° C�Q�00` O� �� 1�a �Q�OD` 0 � � � o co C �' 0� 2" �'- �• w ® C � � � BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA LO Q o o oo ISM ° IX � _ _ MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. H U) 0i L P P. SI EWALK A E ENT 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE,SUITE 230 TOWER N0.223. a C9 Q ® Off•°� of Q I o a a �o a' °p RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730 @> O d ��, o o ti ti �, n� � o _) P P. s1 EWALK BASIS OF BEARINGS: o V ° °' so o� � g ° 5 I ci �<,, W .9 PAD�� o I I I CONTACTS MAPoC BERTONE N / I �� a I r� I I o 0 0 U- 11 m _ ® 4' ��_ PHONE: (909)481-6322 THE BEARING OF N 89'11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD. a o C9 AD ITI AL. AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TR❑15❑11 MEM B❑❑C9/1[5❑°° �p �o o �° P - 11 o ARCHITECT �°; 5� c O`1''OQ \ �01 C) o �2 o Op Pi I ATI N o 48 ��'O QP �� ti 5 0 01.86 FF v, 11co .. ARCHITECTS ORANGE NOTES: m ti o c �1 01.2 PAD I o 00' 11� Q co a, 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. p° 9 Q� O ' `� 11�� Q � �o `LSO° - - 7.9 % ORNAGE, CA 92866 ,g 9�. 00 O J' o_ O; g O ,I I CONTACT 1❑ PRESENT ❑ONING: COMMUNITY °O `90Qd' 'Q/ N O� �� c 6. 7% °- c°O I 32 COMMERCIAL of ° Off' ®® O`L o� PHONE: (714)639-9860 \\ �i I l 4.36/o co Q5 r ❑❑ LAN❑ USE PROPOSED ❑MI❑E❑ USE❑ 7 Tcc ° w,, -� c u ti l =I 3❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 11[44 GROSS O �'� $ �o ,��/ p`L�o�QQ' c W _ �OcO� co < 1 1` I I ACRES❑ �� o. �,• w o o� ° UTILITY PROVIDERS ,.Q.O D o I o coo LLI O I 4❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 5m4 NET ACRES❑ ��°� � :o • 2.� w o �� 02,g W I I I FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 5❑ THIS SITE CONSISTS OF 1 NUMBERED QQ'O Q h O ' _ - I I 844 891-2482 1 ® 01.9 PAD ? I I ( ) LOT Q01 ti~y C9Q''��' o , 9 a C 1 �c� I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. ❑❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 1 LETTERED LOT �� m "- 00' a~i °O F P.O. BOX 3003 ❑❑ SEWAGE DISPOSAL CUCAMONGA o / °' Q�iO °'� rn c ® �I ^! ® RED ANDS, CA 92373 ❑ALLEY WATER ❑ISTRICT- Q p �� ti 1 u �� r5 I (800 427-2200 ) 8❑ E❑ISTING IMPER❑IOUs AREA 0� w Q' �' �'°°` `�� ' \ gg ❑ / "`� F 200` 6 ACRIESE CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT g❑ PROPOSEC IMPER❑IOUs AREA 3 u- w °'� °, \ \ rn rn ❑ / C7o ` o W 10440 ASHFORD STREET � co ir o CAR'. ��o ` �F�00 � rn rn w Q 96. \ \� `� c� 00.1 RIM P.O. BOX F ACRES❑ w 1�,� c o� f 00 cn F 04 ® c �N o [� cn M 1 02% I 10❑ TOTAL ❑ISTURBE❑ AREA 574 ACRES❑ w _ O a, 01 QP I I 00.86 F � coo O Q g 83.33 IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 11❑ ACCORDING TO THE FIE-IERAL '� °� '� 1 1 00.2 PAD I ® !`' =0.005 83.03 OUT 909 987-2591 ( ) EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY / I I o METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT ;FEMA❑FLOG❑ INSURANCE RATE MAP O m LL 00 0 ,O ® IC LLo (, 00 „ I (FIRM❑PANEL 0❑0❑1C8�i5�THE , Q h ® rn O h Q� 0 700 N. MORENO AVE. 1` 5 �O`L �^ o o �� = 1 �' 11 ci ? QO' �j I o ENTIRE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN o \ Qi o O c . O * LA VERNE, CA 91750 °' a' - - OOco cO p " h O I I (909)593-7474 O o� c9 �, � _O FLOOD DONE ❑❑AREA OF RE❑UCE❑ N U.`1. ® a, 5 co /~ �_ 11 M O Q o0 �°� ° I I I I FLOO❑ RISK FUE TO LE❑EE❑ Op. 0� O e 1 ,� 00' 00.52 FF 2/o SPECTRUM °`O °` 99.9 PAD I I I C� (888)892-2253 4 Q• o I p0 o /\ o .�sr O 4.5�/° �I o °� 010 _ o E E I I SOUrHIERN CALJFORNA EDISON COMPANY o � Q' - So I� o I Iio O 200` 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE O OHO' GJ / 07` - C90 I st Q � .� �6 F `O � � �, ^ °�' �111 Q co 2% °cco O L 1. , ,9 4 FONTANA, CA. 92336 oNo� a' rn QQQ O.�O F\C OOc� �1� \ �rn ❑ " 3.77° 00• I 1�I (909)665-4555 i �C O F �� o Q 1- ° I i ZI RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILIITES 4� 1 co Q \C n 5 2.0 /o LQ C \ C9� uj 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. _ � I ci � h Q I RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 - ' ® 1 M o h J� - N �• / r a, ® v_ cb 00 O 4V98.8 99. 6 FF� �� °� 5 `l, 00• I� (909)919-2612 99.2 PAD c ci O• n rn rn M �o\o / cy\% 01 c�0� 96. 6 Oco`1•' 98.2 co C� - _ �o> ofo % i ii" ® O� w I I 1 7. 4 -o°' - CDC W Z I I 95.8 RIM cv I OQ O rn ✓cod oBUILD1 z I °� � - 00.52FF � / '� QP O 0,1 co Oco ; co , / ( O ' oo SETBA 9. 6 88.00 IN e �Ocb �� o Og gco 00 Og. hcO O� �, - 4 o u _99.9 PAD LINE o 97.7-0 .2806/ '� a �b O 1� cn J O' � �, � o i / G �� o ° : 0'42� �\\ 0 0.27' N CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN .,Q-°� O \ CON 0 o Il M I\ 1 L / O �,❑ HANDRAILS RE GF= GF=� T GF= GF= GF= GF= �eF= GF= GF= GF= �GF= "o �� ® off, a, P P. I WALK EASEM NT FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 96.95 �� 2 0. 6 o I Q. -P P. I WALK p 97.20 97.20 97.20 97.75 97.75 97.75 98.17 98.17 98.17 98.58 98.58 98.85 98.85 "?! EXIST.AC IKEO FS63 FS ��a 1 _ F- 1 _ _ _, 1 F ° L °�� 8� I TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 P P. D ATER ,�G .�� L ��' 1°' / 1.28°/ �'�c° �� \ 11.28% C !�"� O cb'` 10 00 00�� , 7.44/o o� /- I I F - oh R . c B I IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA woo o \ W W � '� ' I I o BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK"Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. P_E oyti F C PROP. - - �, „ Q/ EXIST. PROP. STORM DRAIN cod co. i'' F1 i 01 - o,°� Q = �� W Nca Q I `�+° v, JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT s s s s 5 s hti x 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT ` 1.0% PROP. SEWER nI o o S=0.0200 I- _ o o N o t�5 0 co AD'DITI Al. 28/o N \ 1.28% _ _ - - 1.28/° B C 1.28 2.85%o o I APN 1100-191-04 �� 99.9 PAD RIII'� DE I AEI, I I r IF GF= GF= GF= I GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= i GF= / GF= 'GF= GF= GF= GF= 1 GF= GF= GF= (3, Z , , a 5.95 95.95 5.95 1 96.09 96.09 96.90 96.90 97.03 97.03 97.31 97.31 97.59 97.59 F/C 98.39 98.39 98.53 98.53 98.811 98.81 99.08 99.08 y a o a' I 3 9 _ I N ( 0.14' 0.28' O n O ' Oc _ _- - - - 013' 0.28' 41 MU -28' iv o � �� 0.1a' NI h0 O� �C @ Q� � 100 0� CoQC� 0.2� c l� tjb D� o� `b�' � 32 96.59'FF `o' c 1 98.09 FF ® O co o,'� g0, ` F / Q h 1�cb• S ' tea,/ ZN °� '1 O ! o� 99.58 FF O `L � T o s, ❑ 95.9 PAD \ �O IQ �O O 1 97.4 PAD O� ' 4 ` `os4'% � °� C I 98.9 PAD---- °'°' 2/Q O 9 CG LO 11 01,. -�� _ _ 1 N 89°56'01" E 680.51' � II I � -� MADOLE N 89056'01" E 684.51'0 10�Q O 1� 0��5 �,�G� 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 h �O '� t� �, co �, o� •j• h O Q O g• Q �b ►� '� r'� k O Q O Q g I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 PHONE:909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 Ul &bb DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Q ❑01❑ArmDUF�M Or❑❑❑❑ Tal(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 111100 o®o 00rEr❑]❑EIE:lr❑d Eiro o°omd®°roEI[Jdd°El MUE1110 d ❑r®❑❑❑r❑®❑®❑❑❑Ar❑❑®❑®Or❑❑❑❑❑ SEE SHEET CG-04 12 //x 1� I / LL \ o o co cl / / o ,mooco /� // cc? 0 - O soit�i'�o_ o SCALE: 1 =20 F/C � / Q oo& 0 20 40 60 80 o/ / 2, � 99. �. / / / o C', `r c��oo / MO r 1197. 6 � o / / � � / •� / 000�Q, � �o � � ,��`� DEVELOPER OWNER o /- o�� oo �oQQS �oQ STRATHIAM Homes PROJECT BENCHMARK: / rn a;�/ •' ,, Q Q , ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 O ►� RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS.DATUM PER // / - / Oo\o o ?Oo u�o Q► O ' �!`Q A� Off' IRVINE,CA 92612 THE FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN ,` Tu'• / 9 TC rn C�Q r0 y�Q' o C9Q off` < CONTACT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CON-].TOWER BASE STAMPED / 98. 5 ��; /j / 9 . $ / rn / o�ol- 00 O�v o p 00' �`' PHONE:(949)883-1554 o� Q,� � �Q O� O, / "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10046 1987"ON EASTERLY �O� Q ® CIVIL ENGINEER SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL / \ Oo\` /� C / "'- o•o� , O �� O� MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA►�. / a � . oo �'� Q cc;J o� 00' t�'�O �S`o 0 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE,SUITE 230 TOWER NO.223. /� o co OO c RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 BASIS OF BEARINGS CONTACT MARI( BERTONE oNLL. O ^� to (909)481-6322 THE BEARING OF N 89'11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD. ARCHITECT AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TR❑15C11 EI]CMBmC9/1 ❑ ,,p, o 97. / O o � m c�3 #p ` ARCHTECTS ORANGE 1200. 5 97 / - `99 �P of _ 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. G / v jC O 5 C��Oa 9p��`s�j NI ORNAGE, CA 92866 NOTES. �� / 1 1 9 7. 8 /% Q.,O o -� ��D � o QQ CONTACT / Q tip' �O� 9 7 T G� 00 Qp PHONE: (714)639-9860 1 u PRESENT CONING: COMMUNITY m �. , $ l 1, Q COMMERCIAL w / / �` '^ ' m o \ O �� uu LAN❑ USE PROPOSE- ❑MIuEu USE- / // ��OQQp i �0 �k�`�O - O cv �LI I I PROVIDERS 3❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 11-44 GROSS o / �O C7\- to J OOp�� C1h ti p °�O ��y \/ o ACRES❑ 6,, of O• FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 4❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 5�4 NET ACRES-] "' O ' � �Q �� o U 844 891-2482 O• Og^ 1 U ( ) 50 THIS SITE CONSISTS OF 1 NUMBERE❑ `�'' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. LOT W P.O. BOX 3003 ❑❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 1 LETTERE- LOT REDLANDS, CA 92373 ❑u SEWAGE CISPOSAL CUCAMONGA W (800)427-2200 ❑ALLEY WATER ❑ISTRICT-] 00' / Q O �C'�, �Oo� �96. w 8u ECISTING IMPERuIOUS AREA 0D O �Q 97. c�0o '�' O CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ACREs / \ GB 13 �° ,� O 00 0' p 10440 ASHFORD STREET g, 9u PROPOSE❑ IMPERuIOUS AREA 3 C _ ^ sOco ` P.O. BOX 638 ACRES ��O / �^�/ LL o' cN °� ��co C��o Q o___ wO RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 10❑ TOTAL uISTURBEC AREA 51A ACRES-] 1207. 5 0� / / ^ O , (909)987-2591 11❑ ACCOR❑ING TO THE FE❑ERAL 195. 6 coV ti ti 5 ti < METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY 700 N. MORENO AVE. EFEMA❑FLOG❑ INSURANCE RATE MAP �~ LA VERNE,CA 91750 FIRM❑PANEL OCO❑1C8C35�THE O a� ENTIRE PROPERTY IS LOCATE-] IN , (909)593-7474 / �Q Oti a; FLOOC ❑ONE -❑AREA OF RELIUCEu 95. 5 o o v�� / // �. // 4 o �Q�00 r 01 �g ��., Q o' 1? o ( SPECTRUM FLOOC RISK CUE TO LE❑EEC '� O Q - (888)892 2253 93 / / % er o ® 1 Q• g4a $ ' / / ,� �F�oo ► ��C%00 � 0 �.°o Q SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY C/ 95 / t� Off` °� Off' cy� rn QQ ,�O 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE /^ / C cri / gQ p X h �i w M ^ O p 00 0 o FONTANA, CA.92336 / F \ r� / 01,C14 OQ OHO co �1> �� 4 Ocb• NQ � \' (909)665-4555 // 94 0 ca M-� / OHO F°h cc , O 1,D' Ocb O� r�lo ,•Q� / a'" /� / C�O�o , - rn Q'-, o' f \`L RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UT1LI11E3 rn�� ,� 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. / / / / O� I co a; o\o/ ,fig Oc4 '96. 6 ;� FF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 7 /'/ / l / C�Q �� O rn,� ',� ® rn c7 \o �f o� '�Og/ g�o`L �\ 98 2 PAD (909)919 2612 C - �, L 5 00 ti O Q,�O 00 _ /� / 95.811IM � / a, 1 88.00 IN / o o -0 o h' 28° 0 87.7A o O ti u' d G / ti ti O O l r r rn rn / I �/� / O O ►�� O� cAD� °� io.42' P�� /� Oh. o II 1 O O �;❑ HANDRAILS REQ.�� // o �' r �� 0 GF= GF= GF=� GF GF= F= CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN o o, 96.95 �, % 'L / F LjL "' o I C FS� ►�°� 97.20 97.20 97.20 97.75 97.75 97.75 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 1 �3• \ / �; a�o> g1 co . D .�G .�►�C� .c�G '�G '�°' / 1.28°/ �'��O O� \ 1.2' �� w W ev TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 / 95.06TC br, w _ �. �5w N w ,�, 7 9 - IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 94.35 TC °'�5 _ o h o Q. R P S RAIN o �� F� � �. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK"Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. r / / / o S= .0200 1.28/° p�. p�. ►� ��. o �0 6• o 0 0% �`b 4 10% "' °'�5 °'0��`� 10°/ . EWER N S 28% o ° S=0.0200 S JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT r O r ►a _ - N \-1.28/° - - - -- - _ 1� 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT Z/ r 95.20 TC F - I / APN 1100-191-04 / /C 94.70 FS / �'O® 1 GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF- GF- GFf\ ,GI+= ` GF," GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= GF= � GF= � / C 95.31 TC �O, 1 95.30 95.30 95.30 95.30 95.6 95.63 95: /9595 95.95 95.95'1 96.09 96.09 l 96.90 96.90 97.03 97.03 97.31 97.31 97.59 97.59 F/G- r �' 94.81 FS _ _ _ _-- / i� i 0.14' � �i 'C - �- 0.13' 0.2�- .28' N o ; (� 0.�2 ;- _ f - / 1 95.40 TC 95. 0 FF 95.80 FF �,�01 I �� \ 59'FF ' % %' 1�o�'O�o h°' 1� , 00 O 95.41 TC 94 90 FS / °� D� I h o� ti °� '� co. ' \ 98.09 FF / 84.E i i�� - 95.1 PAD o�h °' O� FCC PAD .® ® _ e'S IQ� q`a'� °' v� \ i 97.4 PA N 56 0 E rc� 94 FS - \� - �� - �� - - - ,� CG 103 42 - -- - - - ----- - - - - - / i � N 89°56'01" E 680.51' 95.00 TC I i N 89°56'01" E 684.51, 94.50 FS / -�J � Oh h c�h �,h h gh � ►�O 1`� c�h �h r O B C D / O� �Q j O��Q Op,, Opp, Oy`L�Q Off, Oy, Q Oy Oh�.l,Q Oco.�Q Oco, �Q Oco. O � MADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 / r �J / B '<� lkv �� ' � '�� B �C �� Q Q�' '�� B �C�' '�� Q : • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 r r r l PHONE:909.481.6322 A S P H 11 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 Ull STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Q ❑01❑Armes®Or❑❑❑❑ Tilli(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o So®oo o�o®r❑]❑Ei=r❑d Eiril o°omd®°roE mildElTaim I[Jdd°El MUE111E] d ❑r®❑❑Or❑®0®❑❑❑Ar0❑®0®Or0000❑ SEE SHEET CG-05 / �) l CIV 1-0 / ry OP. RPY 1 1 120,0 6 12 6. 8 / 6, (I ST. R W 1 / + / 620 E PROP. L11 120 6 1208. 6 / / 4, 1 c 1206 J I I / LIJ CO aaa 1T11 AL I / w �205. 4/ / / R D I A,T� N I / / rl SCALE: 1 "=20' / 32 I A0 20 40 60 80 / x i �/ xl //2�05. `3 // ah �� / / 3 50 , �� 1205. 8 / 1 I + �o\ Gj Q��° � DEVELOPER/OWNER PROJECT BENCHMARK: ? 6. 9 81 ATHAM f'I� ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF / ©�'�� S, ?S0, // �� GQ��' Q► /// // / F� 1 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS.DATUM PER IRVINE,CA 92612 c-)��li ��T �� Q % CONTACT: THE FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN �204. 4 O� G� 2.60% 0 PHONE:CT: 883 1554 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONC.TOWER BASE STAMPED 7,c / / 5 ` / / �000��I O �� c 1001 O I 6 V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10046 1987 ON EASTERLY � \ / N °�� 1 01 `-4 ° 1. CIVIL ENGINEER: SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL / 1204. 'cp'A, / / / I 120 / N i - ° M J MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA o oa,, // op ^ �a oIq o��g O� 3.67�� ,`G o Q 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230 TOWER N0.223. LL J '� O h O = RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 � °o°° 2°/ ° °`'' BASIS OF BEARINGS: CONTACT.MARK BERTONE o ,/ ° I I w PHONE: (909)481-6322 THE BEARING OF N 89'11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD. lb �' I I ARCHITECT AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TR❑15❑11®EMB❑❑❑9/1[5❑ rla / 0� 'a. c' �/ °4'� 1 ARCHITECTS ORANGE 3❑10 / \o / 1 144 NORTH ORANGE ST.// / // �Q� ►�� BUIL o�,`ti� I I ORNAGE, CA 92866 NOTES. r/ / 06. D 0, 1 F5 06.5 i SE AC F� I I CONTACT: 120J. 5 / �� 205 6 / 05. j FG I I PHONE: (714)639-9860 1❑ PRESENT -IONING: COMMUNITY + \ 11 015. COMMERCIAL 06.1 TC I I ❑❑ LAN❑ USE PROPOSE:] ❑MI❑E❑ USE[] UTILITY PROVIDERS 3❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 11 C44 GROSS ca 5 P P. S DEWALK EASEMENT 4❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 5� NET ACRES[] ° i �,��Q� �.� � / � I FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS / 1202. 7 "' c c s' '` LL 4' I o (844)891-2482 5❑ THIS SITE CONSISTS OF 1 NUMBERED �n o /° ° o SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. LOT + 12C5. 5 7�6// c c V 6°�I J o o Li O C N P.O. BOX 3003 ❑❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 1 LETTERE❑ LOT / ?O o� �10 O . REDLANDS, CA 92373 Ell] SEWAGE ❑ISPOSAL CUCAMONGA / / 49 TC °o (800)427-2200 GALLEY WATER DISTRICT❑ ? / 4.99 6S �Q EXIS�.AC DI 8❑ E❑ RI ISTING IMPERIOUS AREA 0-0 6 to 05.90 FF CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ACRES❑ / / cy of C9 05.2 PAD h PR CURB �/ 10440 ASHFORD STREET / 1202. E ' // \o sly, �� O o I- P.O. BOX 638 9_ PROPOSE[] IMPER❑IOUS AREA 31:E❑ / 1 01. 8 8 / �� / �' ACRES[] / / ° M 00 ,�Q� , w RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 g Off' �° � 2/0 P P. R (909)987-2591 10❑ TOTAL ❑ISTURBEL AREA 5❑L4 ACRES- c /n� 00 � t(I T. 11❑ ACCORDING TO THE FE❑ERAL / \ METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY LciI-j / c, 700 N. MORENO AVE. :FEMA❑FLOO INSURANCE RATE MAP olU- c� LA VERNE, CA 91750 ILFI RM❑PANEL OILO L1 C8-35 WTH E / o o x N Uj (909)593-7474 ENTIRE PROPERTY IS LOCATE❑ IN �cl FLOO❑ JONE LLAREA OF RELUCE- /// / / c/F P P. SI EWALK 0 8 zRUM FLOO❑ RISK ❑UE TO LE❑EE❑ 5 1201. 4 FCC ° _ ;� / SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY i J10 / 03. /i u-� 04 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE / 1202 5 / �° 03. \ W FONTANA, CA. 92336 + // // / / i / 00 Z I v/, (909)665-4555 N �'� / 4. 5 ` o\o 1209. 7 °°`�, 04.90 FF ADDI'T AL � AMONGA►MUNK�AL UTILITIES ^� � F w 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. IF/ �,, ° o � / �1 04.2 PAD RIW D I ATI N �20 5 �-� a,, 1 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 1202.2 Q` // / �o'N i \ 00 ��O IBUILDI (909)919-2612 / H V Qr SET,BA C - �� (LINE 12 01 .9 2 ®'' I r� 4, o+ 32'� �200. 3 % �' / % 2/° " k o / 0 0 03. C C LA o � 32' CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ti^�° �' ° 2 �° M = °°� FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ol- O E .A ,0° 7 �O� �� O < �� Q /o PR �CU B �. �� I TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 / .,�// Fi/ ��'� ' / c/ �202. 9 1 � ��° 2 6 o °�� o70 w IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA J o / �� o C 7.2°/ O +1200-3 ��o.� / � / M� i � °�o � � o" 2% �G - °�`�30 � Q� I BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK Y OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. �� " "' oo o <<' o�� % �G 2 ° ° �� 0 JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT 99. E F ° 5 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT / '�• F ° 04.2 f4D o _�2% 03 ti�QS I APN 1100-191-04 01.2 /, ,� Off` S o /F y ��° \ c o "' 03 65 FS cn 04.09 FS / / h � / _ I CG104 Wp` j o o o °w - ° 'L off, ° 1.28°° 5 I cn 1199. 7 // �, �F ° �°�, � o�' I112 J J 0 MADOLE "�Q t�'�h O I ° 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 c\ \ / � °� e _.� �� tip_ �?s ..1 ~° S°1 I � _ I I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 PHONE:909.481.6322 SEE SHEET CG-03 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 OiTF TF STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Q ❑01❑ArmTmr-rM Or❑❑❑❑ Tilli(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o mo®o o�o®r❑]❑EIE:lr❑d Eril o°omd®°roEIE)dd°El MUE111E] d ❑r®❑❑❑r❑®❑®❑❑❑Ar❑❑®❑®Or❑❑❑❑❑ 32' cn / O/ O (n II EXIST. DRIVEWAY / / JOIN EXIST. SIDEWA K o W=18'X=3' J m / / JOIN EXIST. CURB Q co N W 0 1216. 7 / PROP. CURB PROP.SID W Lit c' EXIST. DRIVEWAY / I N SCALE: 1 =2 0 / W=16 X=3 / 1225. 1 / ��/ 6 I � 0 20 40 60 80 1 I 44 32 1215, 5 6' 32' PROP. SIDENVAL / 1212. J 0 O x 1 i 1216. 6 / _Z I i �, W DEVELOPER/OWNER PROJECT BENCHMARK: 5 8 / 3°®° / 2. I I 3TRATHAM HO S ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF 1 1 V 3 , 1 1 4. 6 I 1 1 I 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 RANCHO CUCAMONGA OFFICIAL BENCHMARKS.DATUM PER IRVINE,CA 92612 THE FOLLOWING CITY BENCHMARK:#10046.A 2"BRASS DISK IN CONTACT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONC.TOWER BASE STAMPED I vi O / / p,�p� / I 1 PHONE:(949)883 1554 "CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10046 1987"ON EASTERLY G >< Q I I CIVIL ENGINEER: SIDE OF EAST AVENUE 0.25 MILES NORTH OF FOOTHILL EXIST. IST. D 31VE�W Y �-w BOULEVARD,AT MOST WESTERLY TOWER BASE OF MIRA LOMA / + 7 Q� I EIS .AC DI MADOLE AND ASSOCIATE, INC. z c �" / 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE,SUITE 230 TOWER N0.223. 6. 4 I 1 w ��,� �;'� / I i c' RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 BASIS OF BEARINGS: �i4 �P < �� / CONTACT:MARK BERTONE 12j/7 ppp /i I 1 d° PHONE: (909)481-6322 THE BEARING OF N 89'11'35" E ALONG FOOTHILL BLVD. C3 ��(/ / °ti 12)11. 6 ARCHITECT AS SHOWN ON MAP OF TR❑15❑11�dV1BmC9/1 ❑ I 1 0 ❑ ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORTH ORANGE ST. / / I O 5❑ ORNAGE, CA92866 NOTES: / / �� / I / 1210. 5 / Q�� // I i CONTACT. 1214. 6 1 PRESENT ❑ONING: COMMUNITY O / �� P5 / 1 PHONE: (714)639 9860 COMMERCIAL / I ❑❑ LANE USE PROPOSED ❑MICE❑ USE:] ,Z�I •QP / W UTILITY PROVIDERS 3u ACRESF THIS TE CONTAINS 11 A4 GROSS JOINIE IST.SIDEWALK o / / / SpJA Q �� 158 _ L EXIST. DRIVEWAY FRONTIER COMMUNICATKM 4❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 5LL4 NET ACRES❑ 121 J? 6� / / I W_26 \ (844)891-2482 5❑ THIS SITE CONSISTS OF 1 NUMBEREC JOIN E ISIT.C RB _ _ SOUTI-ERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. LOT t P.O. BOX 3003 ❑❑ THIS SITE CONTAINS 1 LETTERE- LOT/ /� 12. 4 � / / 1212. 7 7 I REDLANDS, CA 92373 ❑❑ SEWAGE ❑ISPOSAL CUCAMONGA 1Z� / CL EXIST DRIVEWAY :]ALLEY WATER ❑ISTRICT❑ REMOVE&RECONSTRUCT � (800)427-2200 / \ / 8❑ E❑ISTING IMPERIOUS AREA 010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ACRES❑ 10440 ASHFORD STREET 911 PROPOSED IMPERIOUS AREA 3[:[]C / 1209. 8 / 12t). 4 P.O. BOX 638 ACRES❑ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 10❑ TOTAL ❑ISTURBE❑ AREA 5FFF4 ACRES❑ / 1 0 (909)987-2591 11❑ ACCOR❑ING TO THE FECERAL � METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY 6 1 LFEMA❑FLOO❑ INSURANCE RATE MAP PROP.I SIDE AL LA E NE,CA 9 750 LA VERNE,CA 91750 IrtFIRM❑PANEL 0-0❑1C8F_35rTTHE / 1 0 (909)593-7474 ENTIRE PROPERTY IS LOCATE:] IN / I FLOO❑ CONE ❑❑AREA OF RE❑UCE❑ / 09. 5 / cn SPECTRUM FLOOD RISK ❑UE TO LE❑EE! (888)892-2253 / - 1 1227. 7 / / // �2 9. 4 I I 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED"COMPANY cam, I CDI 1 o 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE FONTANA, CA.92336 3❑®1 (909)665-4555 RANCHO CUCAMIONGA MUNKWAL UTILITE3 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 / 1208. // � I I / �209. 4 / � O� / I I w �� C� f20.V. 4 ( (909)919 2612 + 0 4' I I 3 1210. 6 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN + I I ; 1 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 5Q 1222. 5 / ► I / TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 / / IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA + / // 1207 7 Tq3i 6 / BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK"Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. / / I - — I I DRIVE JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT 1 1 / APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT I ri I �20� 5 I EXIST.AC I _ 120/171 3 / / � // 207 2 I I ��. I I o CG 105 C�y 71L MADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 "" / / / P I I 120p_� 6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 ST. RjW1 1 / PHONE:909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 Np i / \ i 0 . 6 PROP 1 SIPE i AL SEE SHEET CF-04 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 OiTF TF STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE . . 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Q ❑01❑Armes®Or❑❑❑❑ Tilli(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o mo®o 00rEr❑]❑Ei=r❑d Eiril o°omd®°roE mildETrarEi I[Jdd°El MUE1110 d ❑r®❑❑Or❑®❑®❑❑❑Ar❑❑®❑®Or❑❑❑❑❑ wl 0I X' cI 0- wI o 8' 0-I 1CL PROP. BUILDING 3' 1 3' 4' 4' 1 1 1� 31� 3C PARKING PROP. SIDEWALK 1 VARIABLE AC OVERLAY FINISH FLOOR I I AC PVMNT PROP. CURB OVER A.B. -------SAWCUT --&--------- -------- V--A--R-.--A-C---- EXIST.AC EXISTING CURB REMOVE OVERLAY PAVEMENT -- ---- - - -- - -2% -- - - -- —— —— —— — ------ - ---- - - -- - - ---- --- ---- - - -- - - ----- - - -- - - ---- ----PAD ELEVATION III- - - - - - - - - _ _ EAST AVENUE SECTION ADJACENT TO PARKING SCALE: 1"=5' 1 1' 1 LT LT -T 5' I CL 44' 312 31� XI PROP. SIDEWALK 10 ❑0 AC PVMNT VARIABLE AC OVERLAY OVER A.B. — — SAWCUT REMOVE& VAR.AC EXIST.AC OVERLAY — — — —— — PAVEMENT — — EXISTING CURB - -- --- — —— — — ————— REMOVE AC DIKE TYPICAL PARKING ISLAND PROP. CURB&GUTTER EAST AVENUE SECTION ALONG SCE EASEMENT SCALE: 1"=5' SCALE: 1"=5' I I � la 0 z Z) O m SCE 100, I I EASEMENT SCE EASEMENT 5' 10v 18' 13' DRIVE LANE 13' 18' 5' 1111A0' I I F--5' 75' PARKING PARKING SIDEWALK I 3' o z �I z PROP. BUILDING PROP. BUILDING ca O I gO PROP. GARAGE EXIST. GROUND "V"GUTTER FIN %L00R FINISH FLOOR ° A�CI� PVMT. 2% W 2% III PAD ELEVATION III-11 I-1 I-111, ,111„I 11,;,1111,;,1 I ;,111 I= i==1 I I—III—III =V 1 —I I I i __�1 1 1-1 1 1=1 —� PAD ELEVATION - - " —III-1 =1 I=1 -1 I—III=1 I-1 1=1 11=1 1=1 11=1 1=1 1=1 1="' ' I—III—I —I' I SECTION 'B—B' SCALE: 1"=5' SECTION 'A—A' SCALE: 1"=5' I Y PROP. BUILDING IQ 1' j 3' 8' 1 00 �Y SIDEWALK PARKING BUILDING LINE 13' DRIVE LANE 13' �� BUILDING LINE FARIES 3' 8' 1 3' MIN. 10 SIDEWALK PARKING PROP. BUILDING �m 4 4 EAST AVENUE 3'MIN. PROP❑4' 4' �"� PROP RET_ FINISH FLOOR 1%MIN. "V" GUTTER o FINISH FLOOR la- SIDEWALK EAST AVENUE WALL I 0 1/oMIN FINISH FLOOR 1 FINISH FLOOR 10 I PAD ELEVATION 6'4/°MAX. 2% AC PVMT. 2% 16,4%M I EASEMENT 10- 2%_ 2% �— �- _ — — _ PAD ELEVATION _ 2% l I = I''1= I I 1=111 �11 I- 11 III—III—I = — 1= — —III—I I 1=III=III=111— 5=11�fffii — — 2°ro 2% _ _ _ _7F, I 1 - L11, — I — I —I —III III=1 =1 III-1 I=1 III-1 PAD ELEVATION7 I=1 11 1 al 1= -I 11=1 I 1 1 I 1 �111� 1 PAD ELEVATION - SECTION 'D—D' 11; SCALE: 1"=5' SECTION 'C-C' 01 SECTION 'E-E' SCALE: 1"=5' SCALE: 1"=5' c VARIES 3EI' MIN❑ X Uj z_z 92 � PROP. BUILDING J FT ;iv O N I 8' 00 �� I 1%MIN. FINISH FLOOR 8"MIN❑ I i 4' 4' 16.4%X. 2/o o 2%� 5%MIN. r a CO —I I— z I z PROP. BUILDING _ -1 I III— —I 1 10 m I CG PAD ELEVATION it) ❑ I I I-III—III1 I IIIIIIIIII I -I = AREA DRAIN I I OJ 1 1 =1 I _ 0 WHERE INDICATED Z) U_ FINISH FLOOR ° I,;I I I-I I I-I I- -I ,,I I I-I I=I 1�1-1i� ,ICI=� -111-ICI-II1= ,�I1- �- ADOLE PCC CONCRETE 4"A.0/12" 9302 P17SBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 COMPACTED SOIL TYPICAL GRADING PAD ELEVATION : • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 6" THICK DRIVE APRON DETAIL ADJACENT TO BUILDING A PHONE:909.481.6322 NTs SCALE: 1"=5' SECTION F—F Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 SCALE: 1"= 5' DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 OiTF TF STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Q ❑01❑Ar--®Or❑❑❑❑ T1111(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o mo®o 00rEr❑]❑Ei=r❑d Eiril o°omd®°°�oE mildETroom I[Jdd°El MUE1110 d ❑r=❑❑❑r❑®❑®❑❑❑Ar❑❑®❑®Or❑❑❑❑❑ CUT / FILL MAP 1 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES w Y W z TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 w Ll Q z z < ? ICTORIA PAR w co z Q IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA LN 0 o' z � Q w w of w Q ° � Z Q w BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK "Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. Q = JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT BASELINE APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT R A❑ a LU LU SEE SHEET CF-02 ? CHURCH MILLER m Y w w o - - = w A❑ENU nPROJECT 00 a / O -0:4 �0.8 -1. 3 -0.8 0.2 -0.2-0.0 0. 4.7 - - -3. - - - - I I o U Q - - - ° ® - I I I N U W�IBERTY 1200.3 ° o � / Q� Z_/ 0. 0.9 / , .3 C -1. -0.4 - 1.0 ' 0. -3. 3 - 2.0 e. 09 obb. I I FOOTHILL PKWY oti° . 3 " / BL❑ 1203.,3 3 5 -0.7 -1 -1. - - $ 0 j5 1.0 - 3.6 - -2 1 9 0. 15 0 0 I I °0j 0.5 ��. -0.7 -0. °�° -0.9 -0. - . 0 0.4 0.5 2 6 ° - - - / ^� -1202 9 7 ob' ARROW ROUTE / 1200._` 0.4 / .3 Q� : D sg -0 - 6 0 0 0 7 ° .3 ° , 0.8 0. -1.5 6 \ / O O O o \ �'� o LL ai b� Q� p1 2/o % °�05 2/ O"'' ° b� I1 0I,3. -0.7 -0.9 -0.5 0 1.1 1. 1. -0 4' -2. - - .8 .4 - 015 1. I I WHIT' 1199.,3 O oizs TO O // M •2 : ' METROLINK 1200.5 �� O // 0.� -0. -0.8 -0. - 0.2 1. 1.2 1.5 1 i.0 b -0. -1• 2.1 0�4 1. I I FONTANA MOTOR oa.osFs I I I I SPEE_WAY 0.4 - -0. -0.4 \ 0 1�1 1.2 j/ 2Ly�� a o� • 0.6p�`'o. 0.5 -2 9 -2.5 .0 - - . -0 3 1. F\ I VICINITY MAP O J / / O / ?� ryb / � V / 199. 7 / 0.5 O. -0.6 0.8 -0.9 - 7 -0. .1 1. 0. *'0.9 �1 0, 80 4 5 . 0.3 -0.4 =`1.1 -2.7 2. - . -1.6 - / / // P ti� oti 12 5. -0.9 -1.1 - / - . - o 0. 0. 0.6 1200. 7 .2 0.5 - .8 -1.1 - - -1. 0. ?,0.7 0.6 0 1.34y 'yo 1 1 yo 4 2. �'0 .6 -1. -�@ -0.8 -0.5 -0�3 ��' I I o V) 1198.4Ia, � / tic O .2 - .7 -0.9 - .1' -1. - .8 - -0. 0. �7. 3'/ ti°` ry ° a .1 ,, A.�• OHO �M 4 o 1198. v.oti O °tip oti oti ,� 11242 / 1iy + /0.3' �.� I �1 0.2 -0. -1.1 1.2 -0. 0. 0.6 0.2 8 .7 \o N 0 1 1. 3 2 0. � P O• °0 LL 2111 �• I I -- - - q - -1. -1.4 0.9 -0.6 - 0.7 0.+1d.499'0./° 1 0 ."� 1� A ,b. � 5 ' N t of 3 0.9 0 -1. 1.9 1. I -1.9 -1. I I \� ti zl I 122. 1/98.5 ° ss.1s 1200. 7 - . - - - tip°� ®- - w / + / 0.3/ . LL 6 -1. -1.2/-0. 0.9 0.6 0.4 0 / .4 r'b M o�o^� o 1 0" 1 8 0. -1.4 2. °� M LLo oZ:bo FFt 1 h5 0. J I I301.9 PAD I 1 °q� I I / /0.4 .4 -0.;� 1. - .7 -1.1 - 0. 0.9 0.8 0.5 0 1.C�a 24° 0. 3 0 3�, -1. O - / -1.0 -1.1 - 4 1.1 0.7 0. 0.,� $• QUO o°1 0 �P �"4� 4 �J 2. L �y ° ° _ - - -1. 1�4 / / Opp• OQ 1b �\OQ 5� /F' �'O. Q✓ O 2/o o/ 2 3 75% ti pR n II V / / M co.- \ yrc O• � OQ•g� Q• \ Q• o � () °�,. a /0.0 - - 2 -1.3 - -1.1 .7 �� .8 0.6 0.4\ 0.Y 4 4 °' ,,4 Q� 7 Q� . 51.2 .70 .4 2. 0. - 3 0 - -3. -2. - - - - -0 I I „ , / 0 . 7 p o s c ,�, p°• e- LL � °°� � e � ° °° � o ti� pti• I I SCALE: 1 = 30 / n ^?s 1. - -1 -1.1 -0.7 -0. 0.� o y�P o �,�c'll,�i 1.6 `� 3. 3. .7 2. -0. 1 - - �3 LL I 0 30 60 90 120 T _ _ _ 1 01. \ 1197.E -0.2 .4 -1.�8 /- . 0 8 0 2 0� 0. . ✓. 4c'o° . pQ 1.5 1rc�0 sr o 0. Oia�`o v w ,��- .3 -2. -119 �- .5 1 I3 I I o V A• �� o- � 6 -1.6 -1 / -1.6 -1 - 0 0.9 0. , 0.5 .5 0 1 c�000$ 1.9 3.0 0.6 0 3 3 LL - - -1,,9 a 1,9 P .5 1 0. Iy 6 1. -1.5 1 �.4 -1. - -0. 0.7 0.5 0.4 1. 8 o / � 7 4 �7 .1 0 2 `� 8 2. 3.3 ° 1.3 ry OLL 0 LL-o -LL 4. - . ® .8 -1.6 �01.4 1.12 �0. I I ��•OJ O G / 97 C � / �� '%'�O �P � ti• 60186FF a 11� �. O I O / 0.1 4 1.4 -1.5 -1 /-1.2 -1.0 %� .6 0.5 0. 2// . 00 2. �O 1.8 2.9 9 1.8 \ . 1 P 0. -0, o° o-4. 2. - - . - 0 12� 12oa5 5 O ' �° 999SR N ° ° 6 °° �t CIVIL ENGINEER F -,. 0.5 .6 0.5 /0:,V7.a2/ 2�� I O - / � ,, iTs LLo I � I MADOLE & ASSOCIATES INC. 0.5 0.3 0.2 / Q �. y . V. 1. 4 2. ° 7 3.3 2.8 .6 .3 .8 1 `� 9 ° 1 3 -1.3 - 0 8 0. o2s LLI I CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, e0 m O' O v oa• � a o LL . w 0.3 0.1 ° °b,� y �'��' 0. LL o 2.1' " �, 3.3 4.0 .9 3 3.3 2.8 2.3 2.3 2.0 - . -3.8 - �'t�VPA�b9 0�7 -1. I I PLANNERS AND SURVEYORS 930❑PITTSBURGH A❑ENUECSUITE ❑30 1196.8 / / ' ° LL I I RANCHO CUCAMONGAI CA 91 C30 .-0.8 0.8 -1. 1 /-0. -0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 .1 o a. 0. LL 1 2. ® 2. 3.5 3.5 8 -2.k 8 1.9 .2 3. -0.9 -0.��0�6 -1. f �� boa �' \ 119-9 0 I I 00.6 CONTACT. MARK BERTONE 1. 1.1 0.9`-0.6 -0.4 .7- �3 �.1 0. °i �o�, j 0. �, Q�,1 7 2 �+ 117 v 2 t.5 1.6 .1 2.2 .2 1 - -4.7 - - -1.I0 -0 1 I L909 481�3❑❑❑LE113 \ GI d� \ 'r? O° rn O p u o 0 0 .1 RI E❑❑�❑❑i"®❑❑❑ n❑C�❑i�mm❑ *, ��i / 01 I LL S 1.02/0 3 I p 63 -0.6 -0.9 -1.1 O`l. a 0.8 0 -0.3 7 u. 0.5 2 1. 1 C� 0. 0. Q? 1 2.b�' �1. 2. 5 2.8 2.7 1 6 1. 2.0 0. c'-J - -4.9 - - 8 .0 0 T l20/. 3 O eA o LL \ 1195.6 0 gg, -0. -1.1 -1. / 1.1 0.$ :.7 0.5 0.3 0. / 1 y 0. 5��°1 ° o ^ .8 1.6 ^ - 1 0� oy I +., 3 2.4 2.3 2.1 9 :2 D 0 2 - ti .7 -¢:5 3., -2.8 -2. 2I3 � . �� o DEVELOPER/OWNER cLL7 ti O .0 -,.�.4 ,. -0.6 Q1� 0.6 0.3 0.1 \ /° 1�,a� 0. 4 ® 2. 2. , 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 ,6 ° a .2 ,. .2 - 4 8 , -4. 2I3 �1. /U I I F- STRATHAM HOMES / / ui Qry o^i � O�. V, o � b 99.9 PAD 1195.5 /° 1 ,.• �c'� �� ' o ° 5 °I° p Ml � 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300 O 0.2 - °7�a, .7 -1.9 - . O 1.3 - -0. 0.6 0. /0 �1 0.3 0. P 0.7 1.2 1. 9� ° of . 4 „o- . - - 212 +1. I IRVINE,CA 92612 LL O I 94.43 G6 _ oo'� - ° 200. i i 119 .4 CONTACT: 0.1 -0/ -1. -1. - 7 2. 0 1.6 -1. 6 5 0.3 11k5. 0.2 11 1.0 1. 1 1° 8 1.7 1. O 1 1.9 1. 0.1 -( ° -2.4 2 1. ik PHONE:(949)883-1554 / y�QO °oOp1 o' Q pro 13' 0 3.77 o I I O ll 95. TC - / rn Q ro• C9�^� ? w 0 Q y u - ,9 -2.6 -2, 2. /0 1 Z 3 -1.7 -O.Y 1 5 0.3 0.1 0 °' 9��.y 0 / 30 ,yi�.8 °��e O 2 7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1 0. 0. - .1 -0. 2.2 2.1 0. - �, - \ / c9�' / / C900 rn OQ�\'1• o' :/ °i •I� w J ° 0 1�`L 1. �LL.7 -1. Oso 0.3 0. 0/ 0.8 .6��i' O -0. 0 01�g 4\° 1' M �ti� 99.35 ° , � _ � _ 0 2 ti 1 ' � ,� _, y ARCHITECT / .� ^ 1.' 1,, �' c 096.1j 1.7 1. 7 1 8. A 0.9 0. 048.7 1.9 0. - c7; - cn q.3 1.5 7 O 7 K 6 0.� 5 \ - -0 1.1 107.4 ® - \ - ° ? � a Q, ^ II "� Z I I ARCHITECTS ORANGE •Q� °, .4 b• 1.7 8 0 �,3J 0 .0 3 - .8 - - 2 .5 - 2 1.I6 -1. ti „ .52 FF I I 49.6 I 144 NORTH ORANGES STREET -0.4 -0.4 �'b.3 -0. - 8 1.8 1 `6 °1 0.8 0.5 0. ' 0 .7 0.5 .6 .4 0.2 0 0. 0. 0. °�°0. - - 11 �3.9 -3. - - .6 - 2 1. �1. 'o ORANGE,CA 92866 HAND ILS Q. �I o.42 0.2T I ® I n I I I CONTACT: 0.0l 0.1 - -1. -1d, 5 -1. 2 6 -1 °' °k / 3 0. �'` 0.4 -0. - .6 0.6 -0. 0.5 .9 1 1 L_ 6.95 ' GAS G�� 0 GPI I Q�F= bF= •6 - 4 3 �. GF�• GFg.I Gam. - o -4.1 -3. 0 8 -2.5 y�2. 1.I8 1 �"" I I PHONE:(714)639-9860 / 0 8o R?° o -I O 97.20 97.20 97.20 97.75 97.75 97.75 98.17 98. 98.17 .58 98.58 98.85 8.85 <? OQ I / / -0.5 -0 0.6 -0. - -0. 0.91 -0. - oo -1.4 ti / Iv- ' rnlrn 01 ii° •D '<<' 1\ 1.28% b .28% 1 3 - 1 -1. -1 0 .1 -0. - �0. - - - - - p• - - 1 - - - - .1 - - - - 5 - - - 695% -1.9Ail �CCP\ c / S= 0 1 / oQ R P S RAIN 4 1 O oo,. Q LLO CJ I Q5 c'9'Jl6 1 5."A.2 -1.1 9 - -0.2 - - .7 -0.8 -0. 4 �0. % e = - - 5�. - - - . - .4 - - 3 4. ' -1.9 -1, 1.�i �1. r� j I I 01co 11` ER 1.28% " 1.28% L2 % 1.28% "' 2.85"o Q� o ° u g -1.2 - - F= F= GF 0.4 F- GF- GF ' - 0 s F= 46F1F= GF= G - G - 0 - - -~F- F= GF= G - 7= 4 A . 4.1 _ 01:32 FF1 1 LL� �99 PAD I G e 95.30 95" �5� "95.30 95.E 95.63 ��• 19 . 5 95. 5 5 5 96.09 96.09 96.90 .03 9'.03 97. 1 97.31 97.59 97.59 98.39 9 .3 3 98.53 98. 1 9 1 99. nN gS 1.2 - -0. -1.5 -gJ, p�4 0.3 3 � p ° o 0.3 ° 1 -0. o. - o. 2 - 71M 3°'2 ' a� -�. 0.2 $' 27- •2 - 5�� -�. -3 ' " - 6 - - - EARTHWORK QUANTITY ESTIMATE (RAW)' 42 TC c 5.80 F 9y�p1 �. PA 11 `L oh� 98. FF 00' °�' o� 99.5 F O 20/ o �0 b Y119LZ I °56•0 ••E 3 _�} 0.3 -0.3 0 0.2 F - - - - .9 -0.2 - - - CUT: 7,987 CY - � I sS.00Tc N 89°5s,01"E s64. 1'1404, FILL: 4,414 CY N 89°56 01"E 5 �g Q5 Vy 0B �U D9 .5oFS ?10 . p��y 1199.E II V B 0. E�m�❑❑T❑❑® CF101 N❑❑ ❑a- M�� ❑❑ E®m®❑ M❑FH ❑❑ E�m®❑ C❑TT S F ❑❑CUT ❑- FILL CY ❑❑CUT a- FILL MADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 1 �[900 01000 143889 A 1 S f❑ ❑98❑L08C LY❑ ; • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 PHONE:909.481.6322 01000 4 EM45 r 108353 89S[$❑ 4414 08C I(❑ Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 Q ❑01❑ArmFFMFFM Or❑❑❑❑ (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o Oo®o oio®ra EiE:iir❑d o�°�a mijjElTaiai iijdd�Eimaiai ❑r=❑❑Or❑®❑®❑❑❑Ar00=0®Or0000❑ CUT / FILL MAP 7BAS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES z TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 ICTORIA PAR w Uj � w U)IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA LN❑ � Doo- z Q w w �a❑ m n JBEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK "Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. `-'JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT R An Q o' N LULU CHU CHof mY � � � + "' W ET A_1ENU °PROJECT w 99 a- o / m d z '207.2 I I I Q WP WYRTY FOOTHILL Ad I I BLL + �/ A0. 120 .6 15 / 6 g� 1229.5 / / / / ARROW ROUTE 1208.6 0.1 0 11206.�5' /I + I � 7205/4 0.1 -014 0 I WHIT 1 I I METROLINK / / / // /0.0 0.3 - .5 07 I FONTANA MOTOR 1222 / / / / / I o I SPEELWAY s / .0 - . - 3 -0.3 -014 I VICINITY MAP - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - LL� �0�1+05. 3 r -0.3 -0.4 -0.3 013 z I / / l + 0.4 - 4 -0.5 -O512U .-7/y I o r 0 / 1204. 1205.8 r - + A. ,0 -0.8 - s 0.6 -0.6 -0.4r- I2 �sGT/4�c r / 81221.E -1.4 -1.3 -1.5 - . -0. .7 ° - + 1204.4 II II � ,0.1 1. -1.6 - 7 - .0 .9 1.7 - o I I 1 05.6 Q 1204.5 °�ti / 0 1205.E 0. -o. 1.9 1 .2� 1-. - 0 6/-� 6 I I cn + 122 1 /3 / / + 1221.5 0+ 0 -0 6 -087 -1.3 1.0% +1225.7 .6 -0.3 -- P12 III II-70 0 - 7 -0. -1.0 -1.6 6 - 6.4) t�5 1 I I �2V r / 11 06.5 / 7 120.3.5 / .2 -1.3�.5 - .9 .8 6 -2.4 -E6 i0. OI /o I 06.1 yl� 7 + ///0. 0.7 0.1i -1.4 -1��,- .44 - .3/-1.8 .9 .9 36 ��6 - 1 o �• 05.5 S I I SCALE: 1 "=30' / 1202.7 o c 0 30 60 90 120 / 1 0.6 9 -1.0 -1. 6 -1.3 .8 -1.7 -1.5 - o / / r 's . / ggpp I I + 120 - / 1202.6 / + r 0. -0 -0.8 1. -1.5 - o .3 - �s .F 2. - -1.8 0-51�s°PAD1.4 �Ed. ! I ICv r 01.8 r r 0 .6 - -1.1 -1. 4 -1.4 0. � 1220.5 + / + / / /.2 �.LL �0 3 -1. - - -1.7 -1.4 oh•. b. I I O / 1220.4 / / / -1.3 .4 -1.6 - -0.2 -0.4 -�.F 9 -1.5 -1. -1.0 - I 4. / /+ / /r 0. - . -2 - . - 4 .3 / 0.4 -0.2 - .9 3.3 - - 1 0. / - I I / 1202.5 1201.4+� / � - .1 - .5 -0. 0.5 - .1 - - -3.9 1.7� �� 1 0. _ / r + / f `�� I � I �04. � 1202.5 12 + o W I I r + / -1.1 2. �b 0. �1 0.5 6 1.5 -7 -2.2 -1.6 -1.4 - �0. Z 120.3.4 2 7 °a�° 0/5 - . -0. - - 1 .9 0403 .0 3 \' 0.4 -6.61 77 1 94.®0 FF1.4 10. / �• '�.` � 04.2 PAD - I I � I I 1202.2 / °° 12()4.5 / + HV 505 / 0.6/ ©2- 6 -1. -1.7 - 5 CIA - .1 0. 0.1 ,@ 4. oa- .5 .2 -2.0 0 -p. I C I I / I o 1 0.7 -0.4 0.8 - .3 -0.8 0.2 -0.2 .0 0. 4.7 - - -3. - - - - o ° -0. -0.9 /. 1 -1. -0.4 -N 1.0 '• 0. -3. 3 - -2. -1� - e. 0 �0.4 .3 -0. 5 -0.7 -1 -1. -1 - . 8 0G.5, -0. -0.7 -0.8 -0.8 -0. - 0 0.4 0.5 °' 2 6 o -1.9 -1.4 - - w / 1200. 3 p 0.4 / .3 5 12Q6:99 0• M 0 7 .3 0.8 0. -1.5 8 .6 / + + o / + • o 11 03. -0.9 -0. -0.5 0 1.1 1. �`p 4.9 -2. -� -�iv s 2.4 r / 1200.5 /+ / / o.4 -0. -0.8 -0. - 0.2 1. 1.2 1.5 1 ° 1. 0 a / M-0. -1. - . 2.1 0�4 / , � I r0.4 4 - - 8 - . -0. -0.4 0 1.2 1 r/ 2. ° 8 0. � 0. 1.5 -2. -2.5 0 -0.9 - . -013 0 r - - /_ a, ti� o , ° 1199. / 0.5 /. -os 8 os 7 0. 1 1. o. �o.s �� Po\ . 0,, 1 4 _ -0.3 -o. 2.1 -2.7 -2.5 -2.7 2.110 I I 12 3 EARTHWORK QUANTITY ESTIMATE (RAW): / + / - - o I CUT: 7,987 CY -1.1 - -- -0 0. 0.7 0.6 �o• �ftf3�h 1 -0. 0.a -0.8 -1.5 -1.6 - .1 -1.9 1200. 7 / otih °ti - I I I FILL: 4,414 CY .2 -0.5 - .8 -1.1 �3 - -1. - 0. 0 0.7 �0.6 0 �2 1. 'y° 1 1. 4 1, 4 2. 4 ,4 -0. 6 -1. -�@ -0.8 -0.5 -0�3 +�• I I o U) ti 1198.4 - . - - . - - . - - Aso �a/� S °�� I I I Q r / 7 0.9 1 1. 8 0. 0. �. / {3 �ry 1. 1 - 2'' 4 2 O 9 �� rr2 Fa U 0.4 -0 8 -1.6 o +� +1198. 2. ;' r/ o.� /. o .� -o. - -o. -0.6 - 5 Co.1 LL 1. °00 ��,�� 0 7 �� -o. 1.0 I I cr; 211 0.2 -0.9 -1.1 -1.2 j -0. - 0. 0.6 0.2 / 8 .7 c0.5 4-,�041114�9 0 1� 1. M M. .3 - .2 0. 1 2 A - .1 I -2.0 -1.9 -1.1 -7. =I I I -1. -1.4 - -0.9 -0.6 - 0.7 0.6 1 d. 9' // 1 1. 1 0�.b1.1 ,31 1 ,: 0 - - ' cm -1.9 -1-1. o 1198..`- + .9 1.9`" �' O �� ti�ti� + z� I I 12 2 r + / 0.3/ . - 6 -1. -1.2/-0. - - 0.9 0.6 0.4 0. ll ZTA ` �A - . 9��8 1 '1;� 2.0 1 8 0. -1 4 2. -3.9 .6 -2.� - . t R 1 6` 1 0 /�/0 o`° i o`' °S�, �o n01.9 PAD II I -0.7 1. - .7 -1.1 - 0. 0.9 0.8 0.5 0., 6 1.6 2C`4 1. 0. 2.0 2.0 3 0, -1. - .9 0. C / 1197.E / s. / -0. -1.0 -1.1 - -� 1.1 0.7 0. 0.,3� Q I' o°�] 0k� 4 -0 21�� 2. 1. �� 0 375/ ti -1. 1*4 SEE SHEET CF-01 CF � 11 E LIDLL®❑❑T❑❑LID N ❑a- M LMIT ❑❑ E®m7F❑ M❑77 ❑❑ E®m®❑ C❑FM- S F ❑❑CUT Or FILL CY ❑❑CUT Er FILL MADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA.91730 1 EIL900 01000 ■ 143889 A 1 S IF❑ E98❑108C 1Y❑ PHONE:909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 - 0 000 4T45 10835389SCF- 4414FD8CFY-1 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 OiTF TF STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 9286E Q ❑01❑ArmTFFTM Or❑❑❑❑ T1111(949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 ❑o mo®o o�orro❑r❑d Eril off° oo�owd� ❑r®❑❑Or❑®❑®❑❑❑Ar0❑®❑®Or0000❑ FIRE ACCESS PLAN �,�' I I w 210 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ' / w z w w / o � ¢ z TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 20148 // I LU VICTORIA PARK L m ¢ U) N w [if IN THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA �' // U o � J wQ� BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 9 OF BLOCK "Y" OF M.B. 2, PAGE 24, OFFICIAL RECORDS. i' / / o > BASELINE ROAD JUNE, 2018 11.44 ACRES GROSS 1 NUMBERED LOT /' / / W APN 1100-191-04 5.74 ACRES NET 1 LETTERED LOT ,/ / I z a U w —coJAVENUE Y H O a CHURCH STREET / mYF— w PROJECT N w '-'-' W. LIBERTY / I FOOTHILL BLVD PKWY S. Of PROJECT vL 15 BOUNDARY/ ARROW ROUTE WHITTRAM 4LMETROLINK FONTANA MOTOR SPEEDWAY �� VICINITY MAP / / CIVIL ENGINEER MARSHALL MADOLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, ' COURT PLANNERS AND SURVEYORS 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE,SUITE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 CONTACT: MARK BERTONE (909)481-6322 ext 123 Email:mbertone@madoleinc.com / DEVELOPER/OWNER �O DUPONTDRIVE M HOMES SUITE 300 IRVINE,CA 92612 21' 23' 32' 12' CONTACT: PHONE:(949)883-1554 8' 44, ARCHIFfECT ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 NORTH LEGEND: ORANGE,CA92 66ES STREET ��) FH �Q� , �' %;!� / CONTACT: / / / / FIRE HYDRANT PHONE:(714)639 9860 / / / / / // ♦ —FIRE LANE ® o I R=20'min. R=46'min. / / I cz X z R=20'(Tvp) oLU II oQ o PROJECT ,� ' / � � ► � / BOUNDARY O j DRC NUMBER: / �� r� ❑ ❑ FIT ° I PROJECT / / // � ❑ ❑ ® i I � BOUNDARY SCALE IN FEET 0/ 1 60 120 180 240 E FA 10 1 PROJECT 77"- BOUNDARY � I MADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE., SUITE 230 & ASSOCIATES, INC. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 PHONE: 909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 DATE: 05-1 1 -2018WESTBURY ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA JOB NO.: 2016-371 STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE 2201 DUPONT DRIVE SUITE 300, IRVINE, CA 92612 144 NORTH ORANGE ST., ORANGE, CA 92866 c 001❑Arm®ISID Or❑❑❑❑ (949) 883- 1554 (714) 639-9860 0 0® oon =o�o-o- dd❑Or=ElOO 11r®❑❑Or❑®0®❑ ❑❑Ar00®Om Or0000❑ 1 e , 00. + - - - - - - - I,, N _ - ___ O \ Leo j Q i _— k ' A. , .! ti 0 -- --- i ON-S kTI� RING _ J -- - O < --c - - - - - - -t - i - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Jp— LL t r BIKE LANE 14 _. — — — EAST -- ti iLh b I � ✓ ti � 0 w A>\ + DR ale. W C T + o ON-STREET PARKING PROP.RM - _ _ PROP.? m — -- - — - - - - — __j_ -- ------ ---- - -- -- - ------- - w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N - - - - BIKE LANE - - - - - - - - q 4 - -—- ---- - -—- - - -—- - �2- - - - 64L r 0 Lodi, �r _ Iii j T. EA o m _ AVENUE — — — — - _ o 0 a V K 2 U C WALKWAY WITH PARALLEL BUFFER BIKE BUFFER LANE TWO WAY LEFT TURN LANE TREE WELLS PARKING LANE 5' S' 49' EAST AVENUE TENTATIVE TRACT No. 20148 SCALE:1"=8' <<(MA D O L E 93W 151311RGH AVE,SUITE 2W • RANCHO CUCA..N.A,CA.-- PHONE:909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 Pacie 210 +_ RANCHOCITY OF , , STAFF REPORT Y DATE: October 11, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planne CW INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674 — STRATHAM HOMES — A request for a Planning Commission Workshop to review a proposed mixed-use development of 131 residential units(with 4 commercial ready units)and 1,592 square feet of commercial space on 11.45 acres of land in the Community Commercial(CC)District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard—APN: 1100-191-04. PROCESS: The Pre-Application Review process provides a project proponent the opportunity to present conceptual designs to the Planning Commission prior to formal application submittal in order to receive broad, general comments and direction. The focus of the meeting is a discussion by the Planning Commissioners regarding the technical and design issues related to the project. The meeting is not a forum for debate and no formal decision or vote is made. After the meeting,staff prepares written comments summarizing the direction of the Commission and staff, which are sent to the applicant. PROJECT SETTING. The 11.45-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard. The site is made up of 3.76 acres of developable land that is unencumbered by easements, 2.03 acres encumbered by a Southern California Gas Company easement and 5.65 acres encumbered by a Southern California Edison easement.The property is zoned Community Commercial(CC) District and is within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District.The dimensions of the generally triangular shaped property are approximately 685 feet along the south property line, 1,077 feet along the east property line, 385 feet along the west property line and 970 feet along northwest property line. The site gently slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees. The site is located within walking distance(less than 1/4 mile)from an Omnitrans bus stop,which serves Route 66 along Foothill Boulevard.The site is also along the future Omnitrans West Valley Connector Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Route, which is anticipated to provide express bus service with limited stops between the cities of Pomona and Fontana. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING: Surrounding Land Uses:To the north,across multiple utility easements,is single-family residential development within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. To the south is Exhibit B Cl—pg1     Page 211 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674—STRATHAM HOME October 11, 2017 Page 2 vacant land that is approved for a 193-unit mixed-use development within the Mixed Use (MU) District.To the east, across East Avenue,is single-family development within the City of Fontana. To the west are multiple utility easements with a City park. Garcia Park, beyond. There is a Cucamonga Valley Water District pumping station that is located along the south property line. General Plan and Zoning: The existing land use designation in the General Plan is Mixed Use. The existing zoning designation is Community Commercial (CC) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District. The proposed mixed-use development will require a Development Code and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation and land use tables and figures from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use(MU) District. PROJECT OVERVIEW: Project Design and Layout.The project involves the development of a two and three-story mixed use development made up of 131 residential units(72 one-bedroom and 59 two-bedroom units), 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each) that are attached to one bedroom residential units and a 1,592-square foot commercial space. The project will have a density of 22.6 dwelling units per acre. The density calculation was based on the 3.76-acre area of the project site unencumbered by easements and the 2.03 acre Southern California Gas Company easement,to be used to fulfill the parking requirement for the project. The maximum permitted density in the Mixed Use (MU) District is 50 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has informed staff that the project is intended to be a rental community to be owned and operated by the applicant.The commercial ready spaces are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential unit. The 1,592-square foot commercial space is located within the single-story leasing office/recreation building. Three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units,will directly face East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings will also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the project site.Two-story carriage units will be located adjacent to the south property line and the utility easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units will be single-floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space and pool and spa will be located at the northeast corner of the site.Two gated vehicle access drives will be provided along East Avenue,with non-gated guest/customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The applicant has provided preliminary front and side architectural elevations for the 3-story residential units(including the commercial ready units)and for the leasing office/commercial unit. Floor plans of each unit type and the commercial ready and commercial units have also been provided.The units range in size from 675 to 830 square feet for the 1-bedroom units and 722 to 1,137 square feet for the 2-bedroom units. Recreational amenities will include a pool and spa, BBQ facilities, clubhouse, common open space areas and multiple court sport areas (volleyball, cornhole, badminton, bocce ball, horse shoes). Parking:The project is required to provide 282 parking spaces, 131 of which are required to be provided in the form of a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development: as well as parking for the commercial and commercial ready units,The 1,592-square foot commercial space and the commercial ready units were parked at the office/retail parking rate (1/250 gross square foot).The project is required to provide 1 garage/carport parking space for each 1 and 2-bedroom unit, or 131 spaces based on C1—Pg2     Page 212 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674—STRATHAM HOME October 11,2017 Page 3 the proposed unit breakdown. The project provides 126 garage parking spaces, a 5-space deficiency. One hundred forty-seven (147) of the required parking spaces are located on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the applicant has received an initial acceptance letter (Exhibit D) to allow parking on the easement. The applicant also proposes permitting street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed-use project to the south.This will net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial ready tenant spaces. These parking spaces are not counted in the parking analysis below as they are not on the project site. _ Parkin Anal sis T Number Square Required of Units Footage Parkin Ratio Parkin 1.5 per unit, 1 in garage or Multi-family units one bedroom 72 NIA carport 108 2 per unit, 1 in garage or Multi-family units two bedrooms 59 NIA carport 118 Visitor parking (multi-family) 131 NIA 1 per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office NIA 1,592 1 per 250 square feet 7 Commercial Read NIA 1,220 1 per 250 square feet 5 Total Parking Spaces Required 282 Total Parking Spaces Provided 283 Total Parking Spaces on Easement 147 Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 126/131 Garage Parking Deficient -5 STAFF COMMENTS: Staff is generally in support of the proposed 131-unit mixed-use development, with the main concern being the proposed parking on the utility easement. The triangular shape of the project site and the multiple on-site utility easements result in a project site that is challenging and contains several site constraints. The multiple utility easements reduce the developable portion of the overall site from 11.45 acres to 3.76 acres, necessitating parking on the utility easement in order to provide parking for the proposed number of dwelling units. Eliminating parking on the utility easement,would greatly reduce the number of units that could be developed on the project site. This would make it difficult to layout a mixed-use development with three-story buildings, similar to the approved mixed-use project to the south,and limit the fiscal viability of the proposed commercial and commercial ready units. Staff supports the request to allow on-street parking similar to the project to the south.The on-street parking will provide parking in close proximity to the commercial units, will provide a buffer between the vehicle traffic and the dwelling units and will slow south bound vehicle traffic. Staff is in support of the proposed Zoning Map and Development Code amendments to change the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC)to Mixed-Use(MU), in conformance with the General Plan Mixed-Use land use designation. The General Plan land use designation of both the project site and the 8.8 acre approved mixed use project to the south were included in a General Plan amendment which changed the land use designation on a number of properties throughout the City that was approved by the City Council on June 15,2016. C1—Pg3     Page 213 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674—STRATHAM HOME October 11,2017 Page 4 The project will complement the approved 193-unit mixed-use development to the south and will create a vibrant street frontage, utilizing three-story residential buildings and commercial units directly facing East Avenue. The 4 proposed commercial ready units and the 1,592 square foot commercial spaces will also complement the 3.246 square feet of commercial/live work units approved at the Corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The proposed architecture is rather generic in design and will need to be enhanced. Staff recommends that the applicant choose a recognizable architectural style and provide design elements and building materials to accurately capture the chosen architectural style. It is also strongly recommended that roof and wall plane articulation be added to the building elevations facing the drive aisles to create visual interest.The proposed layout,with a continuous drive aisle around the central core of the project site,creates a street scene that is dominated by the garage doors. The site plan should be redesigned to create more convenient connections between the residential units along the periphery of the project site and open space area at the center of the project site.The pedestrian pathways currently cut diagonally across the vehicle drive aisles at a number of locations, creating awkward pedestrian crossings. Staff is also concerned that the proposed 5 stall, enclosed garage space deficit will make it difficult to provide the required 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage per unit. DISCUSSION OUTLINE: The following comments are meant to frame and facilitate input by the Commission. Staff recommends that the Commission provide comment and input on the following issues, and contribute additional comments as the Commission sees fit: 1. Land Use: Determine if the Commission supports the applicant's request to amend the Zoning Map and Development Code to change the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC)to Mixed-Use (MU) in conformance with the General Plan Mixed-Use land use designation. 2. Land Use Makeup: Determine if the 4 commercial ready units(305 square feet each)and 1,592 square feet of dedicated commercial space is an adequate level of commercial space in relation to the 131 proposed residential units for the Mixed Use (MU) zoning designation. Staff is of the opinion that the small size of the developable portion of the project site(3.76 acres)and the isolated proximity of the project site from the majority of commercial development along Foothill Boulevard make the project site a challenging location to add a greater square footage of commercial tenant spaces.As a comparison, the approved project to the south includes 193 residential units and 3,246 square feet of commercial/live-work space. 3. Lavout: Determine if the project layout is acceptable with the majority of parking provided on the utility easement and not in close proximity to many of the units that they serve.Staff requests input regarding the pedestrian connections and if they provide a logical network throughout the project and a convenient connection to the central open space area. 4. Parking: Discuss the large number of parking spaces on the utility easement and the potential burden that could be created for the residents and the surrounding residential streets, if and when maintenance is required on the underlying utility. Staff is of the opinion C1—Pg4     Page 214 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674—STRATHAM HOME October 11, 2017 Page 5 that the 5-stall enclosed parking space deficiency will create an issue with providing the required 125 cubic feet of required storage space and convenient parking to the impacted units. 5. Architecture: Discuss the proposed preliminary architecture and determine if it should be enhanced. Staff recommends that the applicant select a recognizable architectural design theme and provide design elements and building materials that complement the chosen architectural style. 6. Or)en Soace and Amenities: Comment on the appropriateness of the location of the multiple court games on the utility easement between parking spaces and the back side of the carriage units. Consideration should be given to enlarging the clubhouse to provide a workout room and to provide a small dog park.The Development Code open space and recreational amenities requirements are as follows: a. A minimum of 150 square feet of open space area, per unit, shall be provided. Based on the unit count(131 units),a minimum of 19,500 square feet of open space shall be provided, of which no more than thirty percent (30%) can be used towards the private open space area. The conceptual plans do not provide enough detail to indicate if this requirement is met. b. A total of 5 recreational amenities are required for a 131-unit residential project.This can include amenities such as pools,spas,fitness rooms,club rooms, barbeque facilities with seating area, and other amenity types specified in Section 17.36.010(E). REQUIRED ENTITLEMENTS: The development of a mixed-use project will require the following entitlements: 1. Zoning Map Amendment—$9,737 2. Development Code Amendment—$6,873 3. Tentative Tract Map$15,512 (Condominium Map-If Determined Necessary) 4. Design Review-$11,454 5. Initial Environmental Study-$2,921 6. Uniform Sign Program-$2,239 7. Tree Removal Permit-$846 8. Minor Exception (Parking)-$549 NOTE: Fees are subject to change by Council Resolution. PUBLIC ART: Residential projects with greater than 4 units and commercial projects with a valuation of greater than $1.000,000 are required to install public art or pay an in-lieu fee of$750 per residential unit and $1 per square foot of commercial space. The City prefers that the public art be installed on the project site.The public art will be reviewed as part of the Development Review process. C1—Pg5     Page 215 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674—STRATHAM HOME October 11, 2017 Page 6 SPECIAL STUDIES: The following special studies will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study, 2_ Biological Resources (birds, mammals, reptiles, plants, flora and fauna habitat) Biological Resources study shall be peer reviewed. 3. Traffic Impact Analysis. 4. Cultural Resources Report(with Tribal Consultation per SB18 and A652). 5. Noise Impact Analysis. 6. Photometric Analysis. 7. Parking Study(with third party review). 8. Water Quality Management Plan. 9. Fiscal Impact Analysis NOTE: Additional special studies may be required following the formal submittal of the required applications. CB:TV/ls Attachments: Exhibit A - Preliminary Conditions of Approval/Comments Exhibit B - Preliminary Site Plan Including Easements Exhibit C - Aerial Photo Exhibit D - SoCalGas Acceptance Letter Dated September 11,2017 Exhibit E - Large Plans(Distributed under separate cover) C1—Pg6     Page 216 Preliminary Conditions of Approval Building and Fire Comments 1. The fire lane must comply with the RCFPD Standard 5-1.It shall be at least 2 foot'wide and shall provide an undiminished 20 foot inside radius and a 46 foot outside radius. Turns cannot be incorporated into the 20 foot drives. 2. Provide the building data and CA Building Code analysis for allowable area, height, type of construction and fire resistive requirements for exterior wall and opening protection. Engineering Department Comments: 1. Additional dedication may be required along East Avenue to accommodate the on-street parking. A 6 foot sidewalk is required when adjacent to a curb. 2. The site is located within Area 8 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy.The current fee is$39,999 per acre. 3. A final drainage study will need to be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of any Building Permits. Grading Comments: 1. A site plan was submitted for a pre-application review.At this pre-application review neither a conceptual grading and drainage plan, nor a preliminary water quality management site and drainage plan were available for review.When these documents are submitted,the Building and Safety Department,Grading Services,will provide comments.Please note that all proposed areas of construction and impervious surfaces outside of the property boundaries shall be shown on both the conceptual grading and drainage plan and the preliminary water quality management site and drainage plan. EXHIBIT A Cl—Pg7     Page 217 v r �x F A nip - Alf � � j o � r �•:�. ', �\, •� � .ice ��s `-� Tf+i rb=. rmw ....rF rc n .. '~f!K'!^'..Clff"FF - �(, � � t1�ti.• I a _ .I..... ........ .... - - -�............................ .:....--._.-J _. .. - .. ........ - - _ �i 'VENUE CD''` RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. JOB NO: -0-2017 ��• �• PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN onFe: oam-2ov / _ \•J STRATHAM HOMES ARCHITECTS ORANGE �. ,•__ 37artwrgrtt CMVE SIAtF l00 r.rvr.du�atrrr IkvwL CA 926121o4719tlYIS:4 wuAa Lw tTrsi,u�elw,su, wr��•„ •�'�'-- {Ct - . Rtiestwt}3� t LW p coZ ��1 ' e.Z�k:+ti - a L atterr,on IrBnspc�rtation.. NJ 0 qp fit`:big,: 7 1 L: irti.'�OT7S,' wl 4F4 '4r.' .�#. ' v !Yk •F ,."_c " i 'rI y rW7i ' _ 4� ,. �" +'Y `Ir ! rr Y 1} ? 7.. t•�"'[ ". i�`' •� � ft 1 � r.�� v k marsh Project Site ir Mir lu .� -•V �! L. r• i �'r�.�a �'� •�. L } f' ^17 ,r'•T�rt{ '• �� f .f' � ..!V. � •mot' ��"' •�,� �R�, 1 4` f. ..e-�� ' � � .b _ ♦Y I�Ry,.i �y',� 11 „ s�� !L• 1 / ti, # - y � F �� •{�� i 1 . it "4y lr£e�� j,��/�,- - v � '�,+� .�+ �4 a` � - ;� f .pia•: � a1wray �c�Pf7G':4 rc ti y H � .�, .fit• Iy` k '�-o-. K,� f� _ ,�� _,.._i�. .. a E i=oothiUF6{vd x HistorictRte`6fi f416 SCG Transmission General Requirements Brian Leal Gas Transmission Engineer SoCalGas 9400 Oakdale Ave ML SC9314 Chatsworth,CA 91311 A�Sempra Energy utility Tel:8187013201 Email:Bleal@semprautilities.com 9/11/2017 Brandon Roth Stratham Homes 2201 Dupont Drive Irvine,CA 92612 Plan File No. 0221-17-4000,4002 Proof of Review Subject: Rancho Etiwanada Preliminary Review Letter SoCalGas has received and reviewed the development plans at the Rancho Etiwanda Development and found the plans are consistent with the general vicinity. The preliminary plans do not illustrate any conflicts that would interfere with SoCalGas capability of operating and maintaining the existing transmission lines within the easement. Do Not Proceed with any grading,excavation or other construction activity within the pipeline easement area and/or within ten feet(10')of the pipeline. This letter does not constitute clearance for any construction work near or around SoCalGas'Transmission pipeline(s), Please refer to our Document Control Plan File 0221-17-4000,4002 when providing grading plans. The following are general requirements that apply to your project please review these requirements along side your project plans and notify us about any questions or conflicts: • Consideration must be given to the safety of our pipeline(s)during a:l project stages. • SoCalGas must have continuous and uninterrupted access to the pipeline(s)and easement(s).In addition,SoCalGas conducts routine patrols and surveys of the pipeline(s);SoCalGas needs drivable access along the pipeline(s)/easement(s). • Buried pipelines must have a minimum cover of 3 feet and a maximum cover of 7 feet below finished grade. No change of grade whatsoever,even within these parameters,shall be made without prior approval of SoCalGas. • Prior to SoCalGas approving encroachment onto its easement(s),SoCalGas must be furnished with final grading plans showing the depth of the pipeline(s)below the existing surface and the depth of the pipeline(s)below the proposed finished grade.These elevations must meet SoCalGas'requirements for buried pipelines. EXHIBIT n Page 1 of 3 C1—Pg10     Page220 • No permanent structures,such as buildings, block walls,foundations,gates,etc., shall be constructed within the easement or over the pipeline(s). • There shall be no planting of trees or other deep-rooted plants within the easement(s)or over the pipeline(s). • Parallel encroachments within the easement(s)are prohibited. In areas where a parallel substructure is being constructed outside of the easement(s),SoCalGas requires five feet of separation,with three feet of undisturbed fill,in order to protect the integrity of our facilities and allow the facilities to be safely accessed during inspection,maintenance,and repair.Additional separation may be needed for leach lines,fuel lines,high voltage electric,etc. • All encroachments onto SoCalGas'easements)must have written approval of SoCalGas prior to construction or encroaching onto the easement(s). • All work within the SoCalGas easement(s)and/or within 10 feet of the pipeline(s) must be witnessed by a SoCalGas representative,and no work will be allowed without the SoCalGas representative on site. • No heavy equipment shall cross the pipeline(s)without SoCalGas'approval, Additional protective measures may be required where heavy equipment is expected to cross the pipeline(s). • No mechanical equipment shall operate within three horizontal feet of the pipeline(s),and any closer work must be performed by hand. • No mechanical equipment shall operate within two vertical feet of the pipeline(s), and any closer work must be performed by hand. • No vibratory compaction is permitted over the pipeline(s).In rare cases,vibratory compaction may be approved by SoCalGas'Engineering Department following review of detailed site conditions,pipeline data,and equipment specifications. • All contractors and subcontractors must be notified of the presence of the pipeline(s). • Contractors and subcontractors must call DigAlert(811)at least z working days prior to construction,grading,or excavation. In addition to the above requirements,SoCalGas recommends the following: • Potholes should be made,as necessary,to establish the horizontal and vertical alignment of the pipeline(s)within the project area.This information should be indicated on the plans,as needed.CAUTION:SoCalGas personnel must be present during potholing operations.Arrangements for SoCalGas personnel to stand by during potholing activities can be made by calling DigAlert at 811. • Consideration should be given to building setbacks from the easement lines.A minimum 15 foot setback is recommended whenever possible. Page 2 of 3 Cl—Pg11     Page 221 • All potential buyers or tenants of the property should be made aware of the presence of the pipeline(s)and easement restrictions. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 8187013201. Sincerely, Brian Leal Page 3 of 3 C1—Pg12     Page 222 EXHIBIT E DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER (FULL SIZE PLANS) Cl—Pgl3     Page 223     Page 224 . . ..... ..... ...... ....... OCTOBER 11 , 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M.*-CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca x 8:15 P.M. Vice Chairman Macias x Commissioner Fletcher x Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly _x_ Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, City Planner, Nick Ghirelli,Assistant City Attorney:Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Albert Espinoza, Asst City Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Senior Planner, Tabe van der Zwaag,Associate Planner, Kylie Miller, Office Specialist 11 B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda.The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience.This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None C. DISCUSSION ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION C1. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2017-00674 — STRATHAM HOMES — A request for a Planning Commission Workshop to review a proposed mixed-use development of 131 residential units(with 4 commercial ready units) and 1,592 square feet of commercial space on 11,45 acres of land in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard—APN: 1100-191-04. Page 1 of 5     Page 225 MM OCTOBER 11 , 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). He noted that the pedestrian connections are at odd angles and one on the west is disjointed and there is a need for better connection with the units on the project site. He said the utility easement includes recreation opportunities and staff questions the location and access to the units. He said the proposal provided 1 parking space over the minimum requirement but is 5 spaces deficient in covered parking-he said the storage requirement would not be met for those units. He said Staff feels the architecture is generic and is asking for a style to be chosen and move to that_ He reviewed the discussion outline and said that overall staff thinks it's a good project but there are a number of issues to overcome. He said they could complement the development to the south with varied street fronts. Jeff Evans, Partner/Director of Land Development for Stratham Homes said they have over 1,000 units in the inland Empire, the latest is Paloma. This one is named Westbury. He said a gym will be provided. He said they will prepare a parking study and they are not asking for a variance. He said since their most recent submittal, they changed the carriage units to provide each with a garage, satisfying the prior shortage of 5 covered spaces. He said the architecture is a combination of traditional and contemporary. He said the pedestrian connections have been modified. Commissioner Wimberly asked if there is a safety concern for pedestrians in the drive path. Mr. Evans said this condition exists in every apartment project that has a loop street. Commissioner Fletcher asked for clarification regarding what exists on the south side of the site. Mr. Evans responded, carriage units and a wall. Commissioner Munoz asked to clarify where the live/work units are located on East Avenue looking north. Commissioner Wimberly asked if a live/work unit could be turned into a living space. Mr. Evans said if a person did not need the workspace, it could be a bedroom. He said he believes there will be a demand for work space. He said the parking on East Avenue is not included in the calculation. Candyce Burnett, City Planner, noted that the City Engineer and Assistant City Engineer determined there was not enough traffic on East Avenue to justify having two southbound lanes. Albert Espinoza, Assistant City Engineer said this project will have to do widening to tie into what was approved for project to the south. Page 2 of 5     Page226 J l 1 + CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - OCTOBER 11, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher asked for confirmation regarding meeting the parking requirement. Mr. Evans confirmed every unit will have a garage, the plan has been revised to show 134 garage&lhere is no longer a shortage of garages. Mark Bertone said the existing street conditions on East Avenue are this; there are two southbound lanes and one northbound lane. Tabe van der Zwaag said there will be one lane each way on East Avenue in addition to the street parking on the southbound side. Mr. Evans remarked that it is handy to have parking right at the front door of the live/work units. Mr. Serafin Maranan, Principal Architects Orange said he met with Chief Ball to be sure the project meets the fire standards. He said one set of stairs is provided for 4 units, 37 units will have direct access from the garage. He said with respect to the architecture - transitional design was used to blend with the surroundings. Mr. Evans said they could add a pet area but there is the existing trail and Edison easement that could be used for this purpose. In response to Commissioner Munoz' concern about prying neighbors, Mr. Maranan said there are no windows overlooking the recreation areas located on the easement in the eastern portion of the project site. Chairman Oaxaca asked if parking on the easement is assigned. Mr. Evans said it is, and guest parking is provided and spread throughout the project, Commissioner Macias asked what the long green strip along parking is, Mr. Evans indicated that it is landscaped area. Commissioner Macias said it is a clever design for difficult/challenging property. Commissioner Munoz said the design has some synergy with the project to the south. Mr, van der Zwaag said he likes the form, but there should be more specific architecture. Mr. Evans said they would work with staff on this issue. Page 3 of 5     Page 227 5 y ti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ y 1 OCTOBER 11, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher said the architecture to the south is contemporary and this is a good transition. He said it could be more contemporary. He said they did a good job with a difficult property. Commissioner Macias said he appreciated the preparation of the 3D drive-thru;it was helpful. Chairman Oaxaca suggested the applicants continue to work with staff D. ADJOURNMENT 9:15 P.M. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 5, 2017 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Lois J.Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda,please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission,please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the Page 4 of 5     Page 228 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OCTOBER 11 , 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. it is important to list your name,address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record, All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department,City Hall,located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m„ except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days, Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas,staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 5 of 5     Page 229 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag February 4, 2020 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00770 —SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed mixed-use development that includes 131 residential units (with 4 commercial ready units) and 1,500 square feet of commercial space on 11.44 acres of land in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard — APN: 1100-191-04. Related records: Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148, Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019- 00867. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Site Characteristics and Background: The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue and approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements, 1.98 acres that are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres that are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped. The dimensions of the generally triangular-shaped property are approximately 685 feet along the south property line, 1,077 feet along the east property line, 385 feet along the west property line and 970 feet along the northwest property line. The site gently slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Mixed-Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium LM District South Vacant Land Mixed-Use Mixed-Use MU District East Single-Family City of City of Fontana Residences Fontana West Utility Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District Infrastructure General Plan and Zoning: The existing General Plan land use designation is Mixed Use. The existing zoning designation is Community Commercial (CC) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (Subarea 4). The proposed mixed-use development will require a Development Code and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation and land use tables and figures from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District. Project Design and Layout: The project is for the development of a two and three-story mixed-use development made up of 131 residential units (73 one-bedroom and 58 two-bedroom units), and 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one-bedroom residential units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space. The project will have a density of 22.58 dwelling units per acre. The density calculation is based on the 3.76-acre area of the project site unencumbered by easements and the 1.98-acre Southern California Gas Company easement, to Exhibit C Page 230 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00770 — SC W ESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP February 4, 2020 Page 2 be used to fulfill the parking requirement for the project. The maximum permitted density in the Mixed Use (MU) District is 50 dwelling units per acre. The applicant has informed staff that the project is intended to be a rental community that they will own and operate. The commercial-ready spaces are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential unit. The 1,500-square foot commercial space is located within the single-story leasing office/recreation building, with the main entrance facing East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units, will directly face East Avenue. Three-story residential buildings will also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the project site. Two-story carriage units will be located adjacent to the south property line and the Southern California Gas Company easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units will be single-floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space and pool, and spa will be located at the northeast corner of the site. One gated and one ungated vehicle access drive will be provided along East Avenue, with non-gated guest/customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The residential units will range in size from 676 to 789 square feet for the 1-bedroom units and 1,021 to 1,174 square feet for the 2-bedroom units. Recreational amenities include a pool and spa, BBQ facilities, clubhouse,fitness room, common open space areas, and multiple sports court areas (volleyball, badminton, bocce ball, horseshoes). A larger triangular-shaped common open space is located at the center of the project site and will include communal seating areas with water features and fire pits. The parking spaces and recreational amenities on the easement area will only be landscaped with shrubs and ground cover as trees and other permanent structures are not permitted within the Southern California Gas Company easement area. The buildings will have a contemporary architectural design theme that will include the use of horizontal cement board siding, brick veneer, and stucco along with cable railings and metal sunshades. The common entrance ways to the individual units include brick veneer archways. The building materials are carried to all elevations (360-degree architecture) and each wall plane is well articulated. The private patios/decks range in size from 54 square feet to 100 square feet and each unit includes a minimum of 125 cubic feet of storage area in the garages as well as bicycle parking. A combination of block walls and wrought iron fencing is proposed around the project perimeter, with the main entrance from East Avenue located adjacent to the leasing office. The parking area and recreational amenities within the Southern California Gas Company's easement will not be fenced as structures are not permitted within the easement area. The project complies with each of the Development Code requirements for the Mixed-Use (MU) Residential District. Projects within mixed-use districts are permitted an up to 75 percent reduction in the streetscape setbacks with no minimum building separation requirements (beyond that required by the Building Code). Page 231 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00770 — SC W ESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP February 4, 2020 Page 3 Minimum/Max Requirement Proposed Compliant? Building Setback (East Avenue) 35 feet* 11 feet-9 inches Yes Building Setback Side Property Line 5 Feet 5 feet Yes Height Limit 50 40 Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 26 Percent Yes Open Space Per Unit 150 Square Feet 364 Square Feet Yes Density 50 Units per Acre 22.58 Units per Acre Yes *Mixed-Use Projects are Permitted an Up To 75 Percent Reduction Parking: The project is required to provide 281 parking spaces, 131 of which are required to be provided in the form of a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial space and commercial-ready units. The 1,500 square foot commercial space and the commercial-ready units were parked at the office/retail parking rate (1/250 gross square foot). The project is required to provide 1 garage/carport parking space for each 1 and 2-bedroom unit, or 131 spaces based on the proposed unit breakdown. The project provides 134 garage parking spaces. One hundred forty-three (143) of the required parking spaces are located on the Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking within the easement area. The applicant also proposes permitting street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed-use project to the south. This will net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial ready tenant spaces. The street parking spaces are not counted in the parking analysis below as they are not on the project site. Parking Analysis Number Square Required of Units Footage Parking Ratio Parkin 1.5 per unit, 1 in garage or Multi-family units (one bedroom) 73 N/A carport 110 2 per unit, 1 in garage or Multi-family units two bedrooms 58 N/A carport 116 Visitor parkin (multi-family) 131 N/A 1 per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office N/A 1,500 1 per 250 square feet 6 Commercial Ready N/A 1,220 1 per 250 square feet 5 Total Parking Spaces Required 281 Total Parking Spaces Provided 285 Total Parking Spaces on Easement 143 Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 134/131 Parking Surplus 4 Page 232 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00770 — SC W ESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP February 4, 2020 Page 4 Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed 131-unit mixed-use development with the only outstanding issue being the final design of the trash enclosures. The applicant has done a good job overcoming the constraints of the triangular-shaped project area, which includes multiple utility easements reducing the developable portion of the overall site from 11.44 acres to 3.76 acres. The limited size of the developable portion of the project site necessitates parking on the Southern California Gas Company utility easement in order to provide adequate parking for the proposed number of dwelling units. Staff supports both parking on the easement area as well as the proposed on- street parking, similar to the approved project to the south. The on-street parking will provide parking in close proximity to the commercial units, will provide a buffer between the vehicle traffic and the dwelling units and will slow southbound vehicle traffic. The project will complement the approved 193-unit mixed-use development to the south and will create a vibrant street frontage with three-story residential buildings and commercial units directly facing East Avenue. The 4 proposed commercial ready units and the 1,500 square foot commercial space will also complement the 3,246 square feet of commercial/live-work units approved at the Corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The proposed architecture creates a contemporary street scene and is enhanced through the use of a variety of materials including horizontal cement board siding, brick veneer, and metal sunshades. The wall plans are well-articulated, and the design elements are carried to all building elevations. The project includes a wide variety of recreational amenities and the open space areas are enhanced by communal seating areas with fire and water features. The only minor outstanding issue is the design of the trash enclosures. It is common practice that the trash enclosures carry over design elements of the main onsite structures. The applicant is concerned that adding cement board horizontal siding or brick veneer to the exterior of the trash enclosures will become a maintenance issue in the future as, from their experience, residents/trash hauler will damage the fagade of the structure. The applicant has provided two design options (Architectural Sheet A21)for the trash enclosures. Option A uses horizontal siding on each wall plane, while Option B uses stucco siding on each wall plane with brick trim along the top of the enclosure walls. The applicant believes that Option B will over the long term be the better choice as it will require less maintenance. Staff believes that Option A is more in keeping with the design of the onsite structures. Staff is open to a compromise that would eliminate the horizontal siding adjacent to the access gates to reduce potential damage. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of the Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The final design of the trash enclosures. Page 233 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00770 — SC W ESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP February 4, 2020 Page 5 Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 3. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides by 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the on-site buildings. 4. Decorative paving shall be provided at the main vehicular access point onto the site. 5. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee consider the outstanding design issue related to the trash enclosures and forward the project with a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission for review of the overall project and the related entitlements. Page 234 CITY OF ! CUCAMONGA 100 FEBRUARY 4, 2020 DESIGN REVEIW COMMITTEE MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Diane Williams _x Tony M. Guglielmo _x Mike Smith x Additional Staff Present: Sean McPherson, Sr. Planner, Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner. B. ADJOURNMENT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Committee at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. B1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes February 4, 2020. C. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. C1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00770 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed mixed-use development that includes 131 residential units (with 4 commercial ready units) and 1,500 square feet of commercial space on 11.44 acres of land in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard —APN: 1100-191- 04. Related records: Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20148, Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation. (Copy of file) Page 1 of 4 Page 235 CITY OF RANCHO • R FEBRUARY 4, 2020 DESIGN REVEIW COMMITTEE MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Questions by the committee included the following: If there would be a vehicle left turn lane into the project. If on-street parking was parallel or perpendicular. If there was a bike lane planned along the west side of East Avenue. If the project provided a tot lot. If there was trail access to Garcia Park, which is adjacent to the project site. Staff informed the Committee that the parking spaces were parallel to the sidewalk, that they would need to investigate the bicycle lane and left-turn lane, that the project did not include a tot lot, but that it was within %mile of two parks, and that there was a planned community trail adjacent to the project site, but that the project would not be required to install these improvements. The applicant gave a brief presentation. Committee asked the following questions to the application: Asked where the front entrances to the units and live-work units were located, where the residents could ride their bikes and what energy-saving methods were planned. Applicant answered that the front entrances to the units were located down common outdoor entranceways from the front of the buildings. The live-work units faced directly East Avenue and that there were bike storage racks in the garages but that they did not control the bike paths of the project's residents. They have not yet determined whether solar panels would be used on the project, but that the project would be required to follow the California Green Building Code and that Energy Star appliance would be used. Commissioner Williams expressed concern over on-street parking and expressed that units should be set back further from the street, that dedicated left lanes should be provided to prevent traffic backups, that bike lanes should be provided and that tot lots should be provided on all multi-family projects. Both Commissioners felt that the applicants should provide an illustrated street scene that includes the adjacent projects to better understand the neighborhood context, including the architectural themes of surrounding buildings. D. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 4 Page 236 ErCITY . ■ . CUCAMONGA FEBRUARY 4, 2020 DESIGN REVEIW COMMITTEE MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Motion by Mike Smith, second by Diane Williams to adjourn the meeting; carried 3-0-0. 7:30pm I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, January 2, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 3 of 4 Page 237 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEBRUARY 4, 2020 DESIGN REVEIW COMMITTEE MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 4 of 4 Page 238 PROPOSED FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA LSA Exhibit D June2020 Page 239 This page intentionally left blank Page 240 PROPOSED FINAL INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Prepared by: LSA 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 553-0666 Project No. STR1901 LSA June 2020 Page 241 This page intentionally left blank Page 242 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................i FIGURESAND TABLES............................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS.............................................................................................v 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Contact Person..................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Regional Setting ................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Surrounding Land Uses .....................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Existing Site Conditions and Land Use Designations.........................................................2-1 2.4 Project Site History..........................................................................................................2-13 2.5 Existing General Plan and Zoning....................................................................................2-13 2.6 Proposed Project.............................................................................................................2-13 2.7 Discretionary Actions......................................................................................................2-35 2.8 Other Ministerial City Actions.........................................................................................2-35 2.9 Probable Future Actions by Responsible Agencies.........................................................2-35 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED........................................ 3-1 4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................... 4-1 4.1 Aesthetics..........................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources................................................................................4-12 4.3 Air Quality .......................................................................................................................4-15 4.4 Biological Resources........................................................................................................4-24 4.5 Cultural Resources ..........................................................................................................4-34 4.6 Energy..............................................................................................................................4-38 4.7 Geology and Soils............................................................................................................4-42 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions.............................................................................................4-51 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials...................................................................................4-56 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .........................................................................................4-64 4.11 Land Use and Planning....................................................................................................4-75 4.12 Mineral Resources...........................................................................................................4-80 4.13 Noise................................................................................................................................4-82 4.14 Population and Housing..................................................................................................4-94 4.15 Public Services.................................................................................................................4-96 4.16 Recreation.....................................................................................................................4-105 4.17 Transportation ..............................................................................................................4-108 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ..............................................................................................4-119 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems.........................................................................................4-123 4.20 Wildfire..........................................................................................................................4-130 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance..............................................................................4-135 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» i Page 243 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ..................................5-1 5.1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements............................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Mitigation Monitoring Procedures................................................................................... 5-1 6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS...........................................................................................6-1 6.1 City of Rancho Cucamonga............................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 LSA Associates, Inc............................................................................................................ 6-1 7.0 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................7-1 APPENDICES A: AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS REPORT B: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT C: ARBORIST REPORT D: CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT E: PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT F: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION G: PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT H: PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN I: NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS J: WESTBURY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY K: WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE WITH PUBLIC SERVICE PROVIDERS L: TRIBAL CONSULTATION CORRESPONDENCE I P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1 NZ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 2.1: Project Location.................................................................................................................2-3 Figure 2.2: Surrounding Land Uses......................................................................................................2-5 Figure 2.3a: Existing Conditions ..........................................................................................................2-7 Figure 2.3b: Existing Conditions..........................................................................................................2-9 Figure2.4: Easements .......................................................................................................................2-11 Figure 2.5: Conceptual Site Plan........................................................................................................2-15 Figure2.6: Elevations ........................................................................................................................2-19 Figure 2.7: Conceptual Landscape Plan.............................................................................................2-25 Figure2.8: Utility Plan .......................................................................................................................2-29 Figure 2.9: WQMP Site Map..............................................................................................................2-33 Figure 4.1.1: Conceptual Photometric Plan.........................................................................................4-9 Figure 4.13.1: Noise Monitoring Locations .......................................................................................4-86 TABLES Table 2.A: Proposed Floor Plan Details .............................................................................................2-14 Table2.13: Parking..............................................................................................................................2-23 Table 2.C: Probable Future Actions by Responsible Agencies...........................................................2-35 Table 4.3.A: Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions...............................................................4-18 Table 4.3.13: Opening Year Regional Operational Emissions .............................................................4-20 Table 4.3.C: Construction Localized Impacts Analysis.......................................................................4-21 Table 4.3.D: Long-Term Operational Localized Impacts Analysis......................................................4-21 Table 4.6.A: Estimated Annual Energy Use of the Proposed Project................................................4-39 Table 4.8.A: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions.......................................................................4-54 Table 4.11.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis..............................................................................4-77 Table 4.13.A: Significance Criteria Summary.....................................................................................4-84 Table 4.13.13: 24-Hour Ambient Noise Level Measurements............................................................4-88 Table 4.14.A: Etiwanda School District Capacities and Enrollment ................................................4-100 Table 4.14.13: Etiwanda School District Projected Enrollment ........................................................4-101 Table 4.14.C: CJUHSD School Capacities and Enrollment ...............................................................4-101 Table 4.14.D: CJUHSD Projected School Enrollment.......................................................................4-101 Table 4.16.A: Parks and Recreational Facilities in the Project Vicinity ...........................................4-106 Table 4.17.A: Intersection LOS Descriptions ...................................................................................4-109 Table 4.17.13: Intersection LOS Criteria............................................................................................4-109 Table 4.17.C: Project Trip Generation Summary.............................................................................4-110 Table 4.17.D: Existing Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary.......................................................4-111 Table 4.17.E: Opening Year(2022) Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary..................................4-112 Table 4.17.F: Cumulative Year(2040) Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary..............................4-112 Table 4.17.G: Project Effect on Vehicle Miles Traveled ..................................................................4-116 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» III Page 245 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 4.19.A: Water Supply and Demand Projections Comparison—Multiple Dry Year Third- Year Supply (2020-2035).......................................................................................................4-124 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program................................................................. 5-2 IV PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cx2g 66/1 / 0,�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAQS ambient air quality standards AB Assembly Bill ac acre(s) AIA Airport Influence Area ALS Advanced Life Support APN Assessor's Parcel Number AQMP Air Quality Management Plan Basin South Coast Air Basin bgs below ground surface BMP Best Management Practice Burrtec Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. CalEEMod California Emission Estimator Model CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection California Register California Register of Historical Resources CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CARI California Aquatic Resources Inventory CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CDMG California Division of Mines and Geology CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CH4 methane City City of Rancho Cucamonga CJUHSD Chaffey Joint Union High School District CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CO carbon monoxide PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» v Page 247 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent County County of San Bernardino CREC Controlled Recognized Environmental Concerns CVWD Cucamonga Valley Water District dB decibel(s) dBA A-weighted decibels) DSF Delhi sands flower-loving fly du/ac dwelling units per acre EIR Environmental Impact Report EMS Emergency Medical Services EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency EOP Emergency Operations Plan ESA Environmental Site Assessment ESD Etiwanda School District FAR floor-to-area ratio FBOD Foothill Boulevard Overlay District FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zones FHWA Federal Highway Administration FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map ft foot/feet FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG greenhouse gas gpd gallons per day GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency GWh gigawatt-hours HCOC hydrologic condition of concern HCP Habitat Conservation Plan HFC hydrofluorocarbons HREC Historical Recognized Environmental Concerns I Interstate vl PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1 / QZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J IEUA Inland Empire Utilities Agency in/sec inch(es) per second IS Initial Study KWh kilowatt-hours LACM Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Ldn day-night average noise level Leq equivalent continuous sound level LHMP Local Hazard Mitigation Plan LID Low-Impact Development LST localized significance thresholds m meter(s) MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act mgd million gallons per day mi mile(s) MLD Most Likely Descendant MND Mitigated Negative Declaration Mpg miles per gallon mph miles per hour MRF Materials Recovery Facility(Burrtec) MRZ Mineral Resource Zone MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MT CO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent N20 nitrous oxide NAHC Native American Heritage Commission National Register National Register of Historic Places NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan NOI Notice of Intent NOx nitrogen oxides NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 03 ozone OPR Governor's Office of Planning and Res PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> VI Page 249 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 PFC perfluorocarbons PM2.6 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter PM10 particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PPV peak particle velocity PRC Public Resources Code PRD Permit Registration Documents PRIMP Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program proposed Project Westbury Residential Project PWQMP Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan RCCSD Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department RCFPD Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District RCM Regulatory Compliance Measure REC Recognized Environmental Concerns RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment RMS root-mean-square RTP Regional Transportation Plan RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SANBAG San Bernardino Associated Governments SB Senate Bill SBSD San Bernardino Sheriff's Department SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy sf square foot/feet SF6 sulfur hexafluoride SIGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act SLF Sacred Lands File SMARA Surface Mining and Reclamation Act SMART Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System sox sulfur oxides vl I I PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1M INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J SPT standard penetration test SR State Route STC Sound Transmission Class SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TAC toxic air contaminant tpd tons per day USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service UWMP Urban Water Management Plan VdB vibration velocity decibel(s) VEC vapor encroachment condition VES Vapor Encroachment Screen VHFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone VMT vehicle miles traveled VOC volatile organic compounds WDID Waste Discharge Identification Number WDRs Waste Discharge Requirements WQMP Water Quality Management Plan PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Ix Page 251 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank X P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�ca<ty06 18/.2 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared for the proposed Westbury Residential Project (Project) near the intersection of West Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, California. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15071, this IS/MND includes a description of the proposed Project, an evaluation of the potential environmental impacts, and findings from the environmental analysis. This IS/MND evaluates the potential environmental impacts that may result from development of the proposed Project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) is the Lead Agency under CEQA and is responsible for adoption of the IS/MND and approval of the Project. 1.1 CONTACT PERSON Any questions or comments regarding the preparation of this IS/MND, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be referred to: Tabe van der Zwaag Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Tel: (909) 774-4316 Email:tabe.vanderzwaag@cityofrc.us PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 1_1 Page 253 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 1.2 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.CJgc <g 66/18/.2 Page 3> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 REGIONAL SETTING The Project site is in Rancho Cucamonga, California. As shown on Figure 2.1, regional access to the Project site is provided by East Avenue (to the east of the Project site) and West Foothill Boulevard (to the south of the Project site). Interstate (1) 15 is approximately 1 mile (mi) west of the Project site. East Avenue is the eastern boundary of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana to the east. 2.2 SURROUNDING LAND USES Figure 2.2 illustrates surrounding land uses. To the north, across multiple utility easements, lies Garcia Park and single-family residential development within the Low Medium (LM) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E). The Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E) covers 3,000 acres (ac) and was adopted by the City in 1983 to preserve the heritage of a historic community and to ensure the continued rural character of this portion of the city.'To the south is vacant land that is approved for a 193-unit, mixed-use development within the Mixed Use (MU) District. A cellular tower and a building pad associated with a Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) pumping station are also south of the Project site. To the east, across East Avenue, lies single-family development within Fontana. To the west are multiple utility easements with a City park, Garcia Park, beyond. A CVWD pumping station is along the southern property line. The Project site is within walking distance (less than 0.25 mi) from an Omnitrans bus stop, which serves Route 66 along Foothill Boulevard. The Project site is also along the future Omnitrans West Valley Connector Bus Rapid Transit Route, which is anticipated to provide express bus service with limited stops between Pomona and Fontana. 2.3 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The 11.44 ac Project site (Assessor's Parcel Number [APN] No. 1053-091-010-000) is zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (FBOD). The existing General Plan land use designation is Mixed Use (0.25-1.0 floor-to-area ratio [FAR]).2 The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. Figures 2.3a and 2.3b include photographs that show the existing conditions on the Project site. The Project site is adjacent to several utility easements on the west side, which limit the developable area on the site. As shown on Figure 2.4, the 11.44 ac Project site consists of 5.74 ac of developable land that is unencumbered by easements and 5.7 ac encumbered by Southern California Gas Company and Southern California Edison easements. Of the 5.74 ac developable portion of the site, 1.84 ac would be parking and roadway uses on an existing easement. ' City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010a. General Plan, Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2016.General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 2-1 Page 255 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.2 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.CJQca<g 66/18/.2 }� f ° dif'�y't� .�'.� •�� yarr+1�� 91[��"� � „�'�j � �� + 1 � .fit , '. i '� •fir e � - +�� ti•� �'�,,,� a �r�".- ^�. .'�� k_;:�. EMI „•:' T� �, � � �, ."�'��r,¢•. �: �. b �`tf`�� LWJJ AIda S< -•; �1� f ,.•,,�„� � ,{ tea. IV S;44 f:. , ` r <'- FOOTHILL BLVD ` lim� ✓�1 .. # 73�+1.1 - '.l1. yf.b 1 '�• � � ' 41f '�• '.�•y,.}^. a 1 1 11 / I' / • / • 1 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.4 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.CJQca<g 66/18/.2 r v� 1 - _ r > r SF r ILL �1 � f 7� 11 ® ff El El U EJ ® 8 ) I P f 4 L SA LEGEND FIGURE 2.2 Project Area Existing Land Use(SCAG) 0 Multi-Family Residential OProject Area of Development 0 Commercial and Services E:7]Single-Family Residential 1V Omnitrans Bus Stop 0 General Office 0 Open Space and Recreation -Public Facilities Undevelopable or Protected Land 0 400 800 -Education 0 Utility Easement Westbury Residential Project FEET Mixed Residential and Commercial vacant Surrounding Land Uses SOURCE:Google Maps(2018);SCAG(2012) I:\STR1901\GIS\MXD\SurroundingLand Uses_SCAG.mxd(6/21/2019) Page 259 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.6 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�ca<g 6e/1�/�(�> j-.Y. �1 5n � x 4 y sy 1:View of Tasmanian blue gum#3162(nearly 100 2:View of degraded eucalyptus windrow along East 3:View of silver dollar gum#3188(35 ft.tall with ft.tall with 60 in.DBH)located near southwest Avenue. 20 in.DBH)located near East Avenue. corner of site recommended for preservation. L S A FIGURE 2.3a Westbury Residential Project Existing Conditions I:\STR1901\G\Existing Condition—dr(6/5/2019)     Page261 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.8 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigc < 66/ PageNQZ> \a lei F:��I I Q 1 il� i r--. 4:View of degraded eucalyptus windrow(#3166— 5:View of silver dollar gum#3187 in poor conditions #3170)in central portion of site. located near East Avenue. L SA FIGURE 2.3b Westbury Residential Project Existing Conditions I:\STR1901\G\Existing Condition—dr(6/5/2019)     Page 263 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.10 PASTR19O1-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigca<g 66/1�/�3> _ 1 ITO ,,�� , • , - ,`7a� • 1�� . _ ,fit -- } • 1 - 1 ,, �- ice' 1."i �. �r•,,, _ � S_a dam ��, •`' r ,•� I �' r � 1 i I Project Vicinity 40 Los i Bern ! ,�; ,• �'••'' Angeles County 4 w ofCounty All Project r � Location / to J Riverside County 4�• i. T►; �1�.1�'•; I L SA LEGEND FIGURE 2.4 Project Site:11.44 ac Developable Land:5.74 ac N - Utility Easements:5.7 ac 0 150 300 Westbury Residential Project FEET SOURCE:Esri(2017) Existing Easements I:\STR1901\G\Existing Easementsxdr(4/3/2020) Page 265 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-12 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigca<g 66/1�/�(jt> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 2.4 PROJECT SITE HISTORY The Project site is vacant land and has not been previously developed. Adjacent areas were previously occupied by orchards, vineyards, a farmhouse, residential properties, and overhead power lines. 2.5 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING The Project site is currently designated as Mixed Use (MU) (0.25-1.0 FAR) on the City's General Plan Land Use Map.3 The Mixed Use land use designation is intended to allow for more intensely developed districts that combine complementary commercial, office, residential, and community uses in areas with access to transit. The Project site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is within the FBOD. The Community Commercial (CC) zoning classification is intended to allow for commercial activities and services on a larger scale. Although the site is classified as Community Commercial (CC), the FBOD is the zoning district governing development on the site. It should also be noted that the Low Medium (LM) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E) borders the western edge of the Project site. The Etiwanda Specific Plan (SP-E) covers 3,000 ac and was adopted by the City in 1983 to preserve the heritage of a historic community and to ensure the continued rural character of this portion of Rancho Cucamonga.' 2.6 PROPOSED PROJECT 2.6.1 Proposed General Plan and Zoning As previously stated, the existing land use designation in the General Plan is Mixed Use (MU). The existing zoning classification is Community Commercial (CC); however, the Project site is also located within the FBOD. Both the existing General Plan land use designation and zoning classification allow for the operation of commercial uses on the property. The proposed Project consists of a mixed-use development, which would require a Development Code Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning classification figures from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) District. The Mixed Use (MU) District would allow for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses on the property. Table 17.26.020-1 in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code also specifies site development regulations for the Mixed Use (MU) District that are intended to ensure that new mixed-use developments are compatible with nearby lower-density residential developments, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. 3 The City's General Plan Land Use Designation of the Project site changed subsequent to the adoption of the 2010 Land Use Plan Map. Refer to General Plan Amendment DRC2015-0087. ' City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010a. General Plan, Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 2672-13 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 2.6.2 Development Proposal As shown on Figure 2.5, the proposed Project involves the development of a two- and three-story mixed-use development of 131 for-rent residential units (73 one-bedroom and 58 two-bedroom units), 4 commercial-ready units (305 square feet [sf] each) that are attached to one-bedroom residential units, and a 1,592 sf commercial space. The commercial-ready units would be attached to 4 of the 73 one-bedroom units. Units are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential unit. The 1,592 sf commercial space is intended to be the leasing office and would be located within the single-story leasing office/recreation building. The three-story residential buildings, along with the commercial units, would front East Avenue. The three-story residential building would also form a triangle around a common courtyard at the center of the Project site. Two-story carriage units would be located adjacent to the southern property line and the utility easement that runs along the northwest property line. All units would be single-floor flats accessed by exterior staircases or ground-level walkways. The recreation/leasing office, commercial space, and a pool and a spa would be located at the northeast corner of the site. Two gated vehicle access driveways would be provided along East Avenue, with nongated guest/ customer parking provided adjacent to the leasing office and commercial space. The Project proposes seven total floor plan options that would result in 73 one-bedroom units and 58 two-bedroom units. The units would range in size from 675 to 830 sf for the one-bedroom units and 722 to 1,137 sf for the two-bedroom units. Table 2.A shows the number of units proposed for each floor plan. Table 2.A: Proposed Floor Plan Details Building One-Bedroom Two-Bedroom Total Dest. Type Qty. Al A2 A3 A4 B1 B2 B3 Units Garage 1 1 1 6 6 0 0 7 3 0 22 14 2 II 1 6 6 0 0 2 6 0 20 11 3 II 1 6 6 0 0 2 6 0 20 11 4 II 1 6 6 0 0 2 6 0 20 11 5A III 1 11 0 0 0 6 0 0 17 13 56 111 1 3 0 0 3 11 0 0 17 14 6 IV 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 14 56 7 V 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 Subtotal — — 38 24 8 3 30 21 7 — — Totals — 14 73 58 131 134 % — — 55.7% 44.3% 100% 2-14 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1M 385.14'PL \ _,9_S4j• ,\ \ O \ 00• \ \F MAINT •,�- '�� \ \ KC 7 me vell y \ \ ------------ TYPErV O; 0.�9f 13�\�`\ \ •\ 1 / ia'-o' scats \ �•'� * 9 .q2 q� state 4p A `, A 8B1f V ° TYPEN + � y P . •° �� Ob m e<oGsn �� \ TOTAL:147 KINGS LS \� 0 AS EME j 00 (O m 0 �' TYPE/ '9i' B[oGB �Y p1�J 6 A ® 0111, ( J0 Q B[OG6 n o � o� ry �_ ecoc.se o ID IF, '1a_o e- Big Al --Al Al ® �A �A--- LA Bi B 3 BLO62 - CALL B2 qp A2 B2 B2 SA SA B2 \ P.P.SET BACK PROP.RW_ ——————————_ — __—————— •• = G77.4 KA --- --- — $c—— —— —` — -- ————- — TC BE LINE VP WITH% �~--------- _� MPRSHALLCCURi� ------------ 4 T / I/ENU�------ ------ _-=�A��-AVENUE _ COMMERCIAL AREA 1,592 SQFT. _ COMMERCIAL READY 305 SQFT./UNIT TOTAL:305 SQFT.X 4 UNITS=1,220 SQFT. L SA FIGURE 2.5 o ss 110 Westbury Residential Project FEET Conceptual Site Plan SOURCE:Architects Orange I:\STR1901\G\Site Plan.cdr(6/5/2019) Page 269 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-16 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigcx«06/18Z2 Page 27` INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Following implementation of the Project, the total building density on the site would be 22.8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac),' which would be below the maximum permitted density of 50 du/ac allowed in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The proposed Project also includes 1.09 ac of common and private open space, which would equate to 364 sf of open space per unit. Recreational amenities would include a pool and a spa, barbeque facilities, a clubhouse, common open space areas, and multiple-court sport areas (e.g.,volleyball, cornhole, badminton, bocce ball, and horseshoe). A total of 39,467 sf of common usable open space would be provided as part of the Project. 2.6.3 Building and Site Design Building Design As illustrated by Figure 2.6, Elevations, the proposed buildings would be developed in a California Contemporary architectural design. The California Contemporary design is a sophisticated style that features the juxtaposition of positive and negative space accentuated by thoughtful material application. The architectural elements would be designed to provide an animated fagade that would incorporate both vertical and horizontal relief while focusing on residential scale and proportion. Two complementary color palettes would be used to differentiate the architectural elements while maintaining a harmonious balance in the community. The colors emphasize the hierarchy and interplay of the building masses and planes. Building masses would be accented with horizontal lap siding accents in contrasting colors. Stone veneer would be used to emphasize pedestrian entries. Sun control devices would be placed to respond to the solar orientation of the architecture. Of the on-site residential buildings, two along East Avenue would include live-work units. These buildings would be further enhanced to feature corner windows, additional stone, metal accent panels, and signage. All on-site proposed buildings would be a maximum of three stories in height with a maximum height of 41.5 feet (ft). S The density calculation was based on the 3.76 ac area of the Project site unencumbered by easements and the 2.03 ac Southern California Gas Company easement to be used to fulfill the Project's parking requirement. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 2-17 Page 271 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.18 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigca<g 66/18Z2 ELEVATIONS BUILDING 1 TYPE I LEFT FRONT I RIGHT REAR ELEVATIONS BUILDING 2 &3 TYPE II al FRONT Aw Im E 8 RIGHT , T LEFT , T ELEVATIONS BUILDING 4 TYPE II a �7 m LEFT FRONT i �� as C r❑,� 8 i�-�'� ® ®® � � ®® ® ® ®® u�il � III � ;e flu ME [DID ® m ME � ® mo6a MIMI RIGHT SIMILAR AT BUILDING 2&3 REAR L SA FIGURE 2.6a Westbury Residential Project SOURCE:Architects Orange Page 273 Elevations I:\STR1901\G\EIevaUons.cdr(6/5/2019) Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.20 PASTR19O1-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.CJQcx«O66/18Z2 Page g 274 ELEVATIONS BLDG 5A&5B TYPE III A B I ® slit e BUILDING 5A RIGHT ® ®® EE BUILDING 5A LEFT 10 BUILDING 5B FRONT 01 IV ®® ®® ® ff] ®® � ® 0 : e w ®®, I601 ® ® ®®3 — BUILDING 5B REAR ELEVATIONS BLDG 6 TYPE IV ® I § § FRONT LEFT RIGHT L SA FIGURE 2.6b Westbury Residential Project SOURCE:Architects Orange Page 275 Elevations I:\STR1901\G\Elevations.cdrl6/5/2019I Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-22 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigcx«06/18Z2 Page 127 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Parking Based on the City's parking requirements (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.64.050), the proposed Project would be required to provide 1.5 spaces per one-bedroom unit, 2 spaces per two-bedroom unit, 1 visitor space for every three units, and 4 spaces for every 1,000 sf of commercial space.The minimum required amount of parking for the proposed Project would be 282 spaces, 131 of which are required to be provided in the form of a garage or carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial and commercial-ready units. The 1,592 sf of commercial space and the commercial-ready units were parked at the office/retail parking rate (1/250 gross square foot). The Project is required to provide 1 garage/carport parking space for each one- and two-bedroom unit, or 131 spaces based on the proposed unit breakdown. As shown in Table 2.13, the proposed Project would provide 134 garage parking spaces and 148 open parking spaces. Of those, 147 of the required parking spaces would be on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the Applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking on the easement.The Project also proposes to permit street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed-use project to the south. This would net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial-ready tenant spaces. These parking spaces are not counted in the total parking count for the proposed Project, as they are not on the Project site. Table 2.113: Parking Number Square Required of Units Footage Parking Ratio Parking Multifamily Units(one bedroom) 72 N/A 1.5 per unit,1 in garage or carport 108 Multifamily Units(two bedrooms) 59 N/A 2 per unit,1 in garage or carport 118 Visitor Parking(multifamily) 131 N/A 1 per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office N/A 1,592 1 per 250 square feet 7 Commercial-Ready I N/A 1 1,220 1 1 per 250 square feet 5 Total Parking Spaces Required 282 Proposed Parking Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 134/131 Total Open Parking Spaces 148 Total Commercial Stalls 5 Total Parking Spaces Provided 287 N/A=not applicable In addition, the City requires that bicycle parking be provided at a rate of 5 percent of the total required parking. Landscaping and Fencing There are 33 trees on the Project site in the existing condition. Of the total 33 existing trees on the property, 30 are Tasmanian bluegum trees that are on the southern portion of the site parallel to East Avenue. The remaining three trees are silver dollar gum trees and are located along the PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 27 72-23 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 northeastern boundary of the site parallel to East Avenue. All 33 of the existing trees would be removed as part of Project implementation. As shown on Figure 2.7, Conceptual Landscape Plan, the proposed Project would include 10 ft landscaped setbacks along East Avenue and around the perimeter of the community. Landscaping visible from East Avenue would include various trees and shrubbery, such as date palms, crepe myrtles, fruitless olive trees, and ground cover. Additional trees would be planted along on-site pathways, around the open space area, and around the pool area. Perimeter landscaping to the north (adjacent to the parking area) would include ground cover and small shrubs. As required by the City, East Avenue would be fully improved, including a new asphalt section, curb and gutter improvements, landscaping improvements (such as street trees), two new drive approaches, and a wrought-iron fence and/or property boundary wall. Within the community, there would be several landscaped areas for seating, recreation, and leisure. These areas would be maintained by the property owner and would consist of raised planters, large trees, an open turf area, and central open space. In total, 68,230 sf of landscaping would be installed as part of the Project, including the 102 trees that would be planted on site. Landscaping would be irrigated with an electrically operated irrigation system using weather sensors and low-volume irrigation. The system would be designed based on plants' water use and would apply water efficiently. The system would be designed in accordance with the definitions of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.138.020). A tubular steel fence would be constructed along the southern and eastern boundaries of the site, and between the parking and residential areas along the northern boundary. This fence would include numerous pedestrian gates to provide access from various points in the parking area and along East Avenue. Vehicular and Pedestrian Access Two gated entries off East Avenue would provide vehicular access to the Project site. The primary entry would be located along East Avenue; this entrance would provide access to the internal vehicular roadway, residential units, and leasing office. A northern gate along East Avenue would provide direct access to the surface parking area. Vehicles traveling north and south along East Avenue could access both gates. The northernmost vehicular access gate would align with the existing Marshall Court/East Avenue intersection.The primary entryway would be demarcated by an entry monument and pavers. 2-24 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1ft —CE .�� > zj A\ a `ri n'rF . a ' M1' o T ti- LSA FIGURE 2.7 0 40 80 Westbury Residential Project FEET SOURCE:KDLA,Inc. Conceptual Landscape Plan I:\STR1901\G\Landscape Plan.cdr(6/6/2019)     Page 279 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-26 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigc <g 66/Page TM INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J The gates would be electronically controlled and would be designed to meet the City's standard gate entry requirements. Residents would have remote controls to open the gate. The southernmost gate would provide visitor access to the community. A callbox would ring to residents' phones to provide guest access. A code-protected pedestrian gate adjacent to the vehicular gate would also be included for residents and guests. Emergency vehicles would be able to enter and exit the Project site via the gated-access driveways off Eastern Avenue with an emergency override key switch. In addition, a remote gate-opening device would be installed. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requires an optical gate opening system with a redundant Knox switchTM. Optical systems work the same as the traffic signal preemption system by using the emergency vehicle's strobe light to open the gate. Pedestrian access to the Project site from the sidewalk on East Avenue would be provided by four entrance gates. Pedestrian access to/from the parking area would be provided by five access gates. In addition, there would be one designated pedestrian access gate to provide pedestrian access to/from the parking area and the commercial area. Circulation Circulation throughout the community would take place via a private access drive that would provide direct access to each residential unit's garage, as well as uncovered resident and visitor parking. The private access drive would be accessed by vehicles from the main entry from East Avenue or from an internal connection to the open parking area on the northern portion of the Project site. The proposed Project would include rolled curbs to eliminate the need for driveway cuts. Public Transportation Omnitrans, the public transportation agency in San Bernardino County, operates four bus lines in the vicinity of the Project site: Route 66, which travels east-west along Foothill Boulevard; Route 67, which travels east-west along Baseline Road; Route 82, which travels north-south along Milliken Avenue and along Foothill Boulevard toward Victoria Gardens; and Route 85, which travels north- south along Milliken Avenue above Foothill Boulevard. The nearest railway stations are the Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana Metrolink stations; the Project site is 3.8 mi and 5.4 mi away from these stations, respectively.The Project area is served by the San Bernardino, Riverside and Inland Empire-Orange County Metrolink lines. The San Bernardino Line directly services the Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana stations and proves access to Los Angeles Union Station, which connects with other Metrolink lines and provides access to the greater Southern California region. Lighting The proposed Project would include on-site lighting consisting of 105-watt parking lot pole lighting (15 ft in height), 65-watt decorative pole lighting (15 ft in height), and 12-watt decorative wall lighting. All lighting would be hooded or shielded to focus the light downward and prevent light spillage onto adjacent properties. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 2-27 Page 281 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Signage The proposed Project would include a community identification monument sign with a maximum height of 5 ft at the Project entry, as well as address signage on the residential units. The commercial area at the northern boundary of the Project site would feature one tenant wall sign. The commercial-ready units along East Avenue would feature tenant identification vertical blade signs and projecting blade signs. All signs within the Project site would be designed and installed according to the Uniform Sign Program for the Project, in compliance with City signage standards. During construction, temporary signage would designate construction and model home traffic routes. Police and Fire Access Fire and police access on the site would be facilitated by a fire lane and the installation of directional signage. As previously discussed, emergency vehicles would be able to enter and exit the Project site via the gated access driveways off East Avenue.The main (southern) gate includes a fire access lane. In addition, all interior roadways have been designed to accommodate the size and turning radius of a fire truck. Per Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Chapter 15.12.040, Section 903, all units would have automatic sprinkler systems. In addition, the proposed Project includes the installation of seven fire hydrants on site to ensure that 150 ft fire hoses can reach every area. Sustainability Features The proposed Project would be consistent with California's Title 24 energy efficiency code. 2.6.4 Infrastructure Improvements On-Site and Off-Site Infrastructure The proposed Project would include connections to existing off-site infrastructure systems. These systems, which include water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater drains, would be constructed on site and would be fully provided and maintained by the property owner. As shown on Figure 2.8, Utility Plan, all on-site systems, would connect to existing infrastructure on East Avenue. As part of the proposed Project, sewer lines and manholes would be installed at two points in East Avenue. One sewer line and manhole would be located south of the Project's main driveway and the second sewer line and manhole would be located in East Avenue south of the Project boundary. Four water lines would be installed within East Avenue and would travel within the Project's internal circulation system to provide water conveyance throughout the Project site. The proposed on-site storm drain would connect to a proposed storm drain system in East Avenue that would run south and connect to the existing storm drain system in East Avenue. 2-28 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1�0 II / I I IIII k( OSEDWATER WATER / I IN. STORM DRAIN � SSTING SEWER STING WATER ' I / / I III I PR POSED WATER BEGIN WATER II FJ -- I III kOPOE SEWER MANHOLE FIROPOSEE SEWER if I II I I � L III _ IIII — 11 L SA LEGEND FIGURE 2.8 Water Sewer Storm Drain N o so 120 Westbury Residential Project FEET Utility Plan SOURCE:Architects Orange I:\STR1901\G\Utility_PImcdr(8/29/2019)     Page 283 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2.30 PASTR19O1-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�ca<g 66/1�/ 4 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Water Quality The proposed Project is subject to the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board's (RWQCB) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino, and the Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region (Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System [MS4] permit). A Project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be developed for the Project to meet the requirements of Order No. R8-2010-0036 and implement best management practices (BMPs) to reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) (Madole and Associates, Inc., June 2019) (Appendix H) has been prepared for the Project. As outlined in the PWQMP, proposed BMPs for the Project include storm drain stenciling to discourage downstream dumping, the installation of a catch basin filter to remove the majority of trash and debris prior to reaching underground storm drains, a settling chamber to filter pollutants, and an injection well to capture and infiltrate water runoff throughout the Project site. These proposed BMPs would meet the Project's Low-Impact Development (LID) requirements. The PWQMP site map is shown on Figure 2.9, WQMP Site Map. Refer to Section 4.10 for additional information pertaining to hydrology and water quality. 2.6.5 Implementation/Phasing Project construction would generally take place in the following steps: • Phase 1: Site Preparation • Phase 2: Grading • Phase 3: Construction • Phase 4: Paving During Project construction, construction vehicle trips would be generated on a daily basis. Construction trips would be generated by construction workers commuting to and from the Project site and the delivery of construction materials and equipment. The construction phase with the highest trip generation would be Phase 3, Construction. During this phase of Project construction, there would be 139 worker trips and 31 vendor trips. For the purposes of the analysis in this IS/MND, it is assumed that construction workers would arrive and depart during peak hours, whereas delivery trucks would arrive and depart throughout the day. It is estimated that no more than 10 percent(3 trips) of delivery trips would occur during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Project construction is anticipated to take approximately 18 months. The expected date of completion is June 2022. All construction equipment would be staged on the Project site for the duration of the construction period. In addition, construction workers would park their personal vehicles on the construction site during working hours. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 2-31 Page 285 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-32 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigc <g 66/Page T6(jt> LEGEND: DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY OMAXWELL IV INJECTION WELL DA DRAINAGE AREA p 'I SF SQUARE FEET CF CUBIC FEET X ✓ �� ' DCV DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME IMP IMPERVIOUS RATIO Qbmp WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE l SO.CAL.GAS EASEMENT 1 DA1 +" TREATMENT AREA=268,160 SF(6.2 AC.) +� IMPERVIOUSNESS=0.80(80%) 1205 DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME=21,487 CF(0.49 AC-FT) �} u QBMP=1.1 CFS 1204 I TREATMENT AREA BOUNDARY /PROP.1.0'CONTOURS ---EXIST 1.0'CONTOURS W 7 / /� ti° + Doti W II 1195 +� + +,,,, �� Q / I WII i +� SYSTEM 1 + SYSTEM 2 i ��U6_ XX9Y XX9B 3i i i 1 I XI .36"GASLINEa L SA FIGURE 2.9 N o so 160 Westbury Residential Project FEET SOURCE:Madole&Associates,Inc. WQM P Site Map I:\STR1901\G\WQMRcdr(6/20/2019) Page 287 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-34 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.� yca<t066/T69 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 2.7 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS Development of the proposed Project would require discretionary approvals by the City as the Lead Agency.The City's discretionary actions would include the following: • Zoning Map and Development Code Amendment: The Project site currently has a zoning designation of Community Commercial (CC). The Project proposes to rezone the Project site to Mixed Use (MU). • Tentative Tract Map: A Tentative Tract Map is required to subdivide the property to allow for future conversion of the residential units to condominiums. • Tree Removal Permit:A permit is required to remove the 33 existing trees on the Project site. • Uniform Sign Program: A Uniform Sign Program is required for the residential, commercial, and commercial-ready portions of the Project. 2.8 OTHER MINISTERIAL CITY ACTIONS Ministerial permits/approvals would be issued by the City or other appropriate agencies to allow site preparations, underground infiltration chambers, connections to the utility infrastructure, dwelling units, paving, landscaping, walls and fences, and other Project features subject to ministerial permits. 2.9 PROBABLE FUTURE ACTIONS BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES Because the Project also involves approvals, permits, or authorization from other agencies, these agencies are "Responsible Agencies" under CEQA. Section 15381 of the State CEQA Guidelines defines Responsible Agencies as public agencies other than the Lead Agency that will have discretionary approval power over the Project or some component of the Project, including mitigation.These agencies include, but are not limited to,the agencies identified in Table 2.C. Table 2.C: Probable Future Actions by Responsible Agencies Responsible Agency Action Rancho Cucamonga Fire Approval of Fuel Modification Plan and Fire Master Plan Protection District State Water Resources Control Applicant/Developer must submit Permit Registration Documents,including a Board Notice of Intent,to comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System San Bernardino County Permit(Santa Ana Region)(Order No. R8-2010- 0036,NPDES No.CAS618036)(San Bernardino County MS4 permit). P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 2d-35 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 2-36 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.� yca<t066/TM INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Chapter 3.0. ❑Aesthetics ❑Agriculture and Forestry Resources ❑Air Quality ® Biological Resources ® Cultural Resources ❑ Energy ®Geology/Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ® Hazards& Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ® Noise ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑Transportation ®Tribal Cultural Resources ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Wildfire ® Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed Project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required. Signature Date PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 3_1 Page 291 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 3.2 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.cigc < 66/ PageT6QZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g.,the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A"No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g.,the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact."The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g.,general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-1 Page 293 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. The mitigation measure identified, if any,to reduce the impact to less than significance. 4.2 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cx2g 66/NOl> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.1 AESTHETICS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings ❑ ❑ ❑ within a state scenic highway c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ from a publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area,would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would ❑ ❑ ® ❑ adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Impact Analysis a) Would the project have a substantial effect on a scenic vista? California State Government Code Section 65560(b)(3) stipulates that city and county General Plans address "...Open space for outdoor recreation, including but not limited to, areas of outstanding scenic, historical and cultural value; areas particularly suited for park and recreation purposes, including access to lakes shores, beaches, and rivers, and streams; and areas which serve as links between major recreation and open space reservations, including utility easements, banks of rivers and streams,trails, and scenic highway corridors." A scenic vista is the view of an area that is visually or aesthetically pleasing from a certain vantage point. It is usually viewed from some distance away. Aesthetic components of a scenic vista include (1) scenic quality, (2) sensitivity level, and (3) view access. A scenic vista can be impacted in two ways: a development project can have visual impacts by either directly diminishing the scenic quality of the vista or by blocking the view corridors or "vista" of the scenic resource. Important factors in determining whether a proposed Project would block scenic vistas include the project's proposed height, mass, and location relative to surrounding land uses and travel corridors. The Project site is located in a developed area of Rancho Cucamonga east of 1-15 and near the intersection of West Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The Project site is currently undeveloped and is characterized by an undeveloped dirt lot, ruderal vegetation, and mature trees. Surrounding views comprise a developed suburban environment that is primarily built out with residential and commercial uses. Distant views of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north and northeast are visible from various vantage points throughout Rancho Cucamonga. Within the vicinity of the Project site, views of the San Gabriel Mountains are visible from the Project site and areas immediately south of the Project PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-1 Page 295 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 site. Other views in the vicinity include views of single-family housing, Garcia Park, and a flood channel extending from the eastern side of East Avenue to the area immediately south of the East Avenue/Foothill Boulevard intersection. The City's General Plan Resource Conservation Element (2010) provides direction regarding the preservation and enhancement of important views along north-south roadways, along open space corridors, and at other key scenic locations within Rancho Cucamonga. As described in the Resource Conservation Element, north-south roadways in Rancho Cucamonga provide important views of scenic resources. The orientation of roadways in the city provide important views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest. The Project site is adjacent to East Avenue, a north- south roadway. However, according to General Plan Figure LU-6, East Avenue is not a designated View Corridor.Additionally, no designated trails or vantage points currently exist on the Project site. In addition, the City's General Plan Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element establishes View Corridors throughout Rancho Cucamonga. There are no designated View Corridors within the vicinity of the Project site.The nearest View Corridor is the portion of Day Creek Boulevard north of Baseline Avenue. Day Creek Boulevard is a north-south roadway 1.5 mi northwest of the Project site that provides north-facing views of the varied natural topography of the mountains. State Route (SR) 210 is an east-west designated View Corridor 1.85 mi north of the Project site that offers similar mountainous views. Construction. Construction of the proposed Project would require site preparation, grading, and construction activities. Construction activities would be visible to travelers along East Avenue and West Foothill Boulevard and to users of Garcia Park. Any partial obstruction of scenic views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest as a result of construction activities would be short-term in nature and would cease upon Project completion. In addition, construction equipment is not of sufficient height or mass to substantially block views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest. Therefore, construction impacts related to adverse effects on a scenic vista would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Operation. As previously stated, the proposed Project would be located in a developed area of Rancho Cucamonga.The Project includes the development of a mixed-use community that would be a maximum of three stories (approximately 42 ft in height), which could result in the partial obstruction of scenic views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest. While the partial obstruction of views of surrounding hills may occur as a result of Project implementation, overall views of surrounding hillsides would not be substantially affected by development of the site due to the prominence of these features. Further, the Project would include landscaping elements throughout the Project site and along the site's perimeter, which would serve to enhance scenic views and would block views of the proposed residential uses from adjacent roadways. The proposed residential development would be similar in height to the surrounding residential developments (e.g., the residences to the northwest), which are two stories in height. While the proposed Project would be taller than adjacent structures and may partially obstruct views of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest from the Project site and surrounding area, the overall views of the mountains and associated foothills would not be substantially affected by the Project due to the prominence of the mountains. 4.-2 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1�k INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J While implementation of the proposed Project would modify views of and from the Project site by allowing for development of a residential community on the site, the Project would not result in significant impacts on visual and aesthetic resources as compared to existing conditions. Therefore, potential impacts of the proposed Project on scenic vistas would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? The California Department of Transportation's (Caltrans) Landscape Architecture Program administers the Scenic Highway Program, contained in the Streets and Highways Code, Sections 260-263. State Highways are classified as either Officially Listed or Eligible. There are no Officially Listed or Eligible State-designated scenic highways in Rancho Cucamonga.6 North-south roadways provide important views of scenic resources in the city.' Therefore, the proposed Project does not have the potential to damage resources within a State-designated scenic highway. The Project site is located within a developed area of Rancho Cucamonga that is primarily characterized by commercial and residential uses. As discussed further in Section 4.4, Biological Resources, existing vegetation on the Project site is ruderal and nonnative. The proposed Project would replace existing ruderal vegetation on the site with ornamental landscaping. In addition, no existing aesthetic or visual resources located on the Project site or in the surrounding vicinity have been designated in the City's General Plan. No existing scenic rock outcroppings are located within the Project limits. While the proposed Project would result in the removal of all 33 existing trees on the site, the Project proposes to replace these trees and landscaping with new trees and vegetation along the internal roadways and the southern and eastern borders of the site. There are no historic buildings on or near the Project site. Therefore, the proposed Project does not have the potential to damage scenic resources, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 6 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). California Scenic Highway Mapping System (San Bernardino County). ' City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. 2010. Resource Conservation Element. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-3 Page 297 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 c) In non-urbanized areas, would the Project, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped, but it is located in an urbanized area. The area is predominantly characterized by a variety of residential and commercial uses, and major roadways, such West Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. As discussed in detail below, the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable zoning or General Plan regulations governing scenic quality. Construction. Construction of the proposed Project would involve on-site construction activities that would be visible to travelers along East Avenue and West Foothill Boulevard. Due to the height of the proposed three-story buildings, construction activities would not be fully screened from surrounding land uses. However, construction activities would be temporary in nature and, consequently, would not substantially impact sensitive uses. Therefore, due to the short-term duration of construction activities, impacts during construction would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Operation. As described above, the visual character immediately surrounding the Project site is representative of a fully built-out urban area containing a mix of residential and commercial uses. All structures developed on the Project site would be of contemporary architectural design, consistent with other residential communities in the vicinity, and composed of colors and materials that complement existing surroundings. The form and scale of all structures on site would be visually consistent with neighboring residential developments. The proposed Project would incorporate ornamental landscaping along East Avenue and throughout the proposed residential development to frame and enhance views of the Project site. The proposed Project would be visible to pedestrians and vehicular traffic along East Avenue and to users of Garcia Park. The installation of landscaping and fencing would help to partially screen the residential development from the surrounding areas. Building design and landscaping would serve to enhance the existing visual quality and character of the site as compared to existing conditions. Zoning. The Project site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is within the FBOD.The Community Commercial (CC) zone allows for larger retail, entertainment, and commercial service business centers, generally as part of a cohesive and coordinated shopping destination of retail and service-oriented businesses that serve the entire community. The Project proposes to develop 131 for-rent residential units, 4 commercial-ready units, and a 1,592 sf commercial space. As such, the Project site would require a Zoning Map and Development Code Amendment to rezone the site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU). Chapter 17.36.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code outlines permitted uses and minimum development standards allowed in the Mixed Use (MU) District. One purpose of these regulations is to ensure compliance with appropriate standards related to aesthetics and scenic quality. The proposed Project would be consistent with the development standards allowed in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The maximum density allowed in this zone is 50 du/ac. The Project proposes a net density of 22.8 du/ac, which is less than the maximum density requirement. Other development 4-4 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. g 66/cx2 SQZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J standards for this zone include a 50-75 percent reduction of streetscape requirements for street yard setbacks along major and secondary roadways. The building setback for attached single-family residential and multifamily residential along secondary roadways is 35 ft. The portion of the proposed Project that is aligned with East Avenue (a secondary roadway) would have a setback of 10 ft, which is a 71 percent reduction in the streetscape setback and falls within the allowed reduction range of 50-75 percent for the Mixed Use (MU) District. The Mixed Use (MU) District also allows for a rear-yard setback of 0 ft, which is consistent with the proposed Project design. In the Mixed Use (MU) zone, the primary building height is not to exceed 75 ft, and the accessory building height is not exceed the primary building height. As previously discussed, the proposed Project would be approximately 42 ft in height at its tallest point. Accessory buildings within the proposed community range in height from approximately 20 ft to 41 ft. The minimum required landscape area is 10 percent, and a minimum of 150 sf of open space per unit is required in the Mixed Use (MU) District. The proposed Project would provide 39,467 sf of common usable open space and 8,193 sf of private open space, which would provide 364 sf of open space per unit. Finally, per the Municipal Code, all Mixed Use (MU) District developments must incorporate a minimum of two of the following land uses: commercial, office, institutional, residential, and live/work. The proposed Project would include residential and commercial requirements, thereby satisfying the Mixed Use (MU) District land use requirement. General Plan. According to the City's General Plan Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element (2010), the Project site currently has a land use designation of Mixed Use (MU). The proposed Project would be consistent with permitted uses in this designation, which allows for a combination of commercial, office, residential, and community uses. The proposed Project would also be consistent with applicable goals and policies regulating visual character and urban design in Rancho Cucamonga: • Goal LU-9: Foster a cohesive, healthy community through appropriate patterns and scales of development, including complementary transitions between districts, neighborhoods, and land uses. • Policy LU-9.2: Integrate districts and neighborhoods into the overall City structure and image. • Policy LU-9.5: Establish Mixed Use areas as higher intensity "urban centers' where there is sensitive integration of land uses, convenient modes of transportation, and a focused "sense of place"that emanates from the architectural and landscape design. • Goal LU-11: Ensure that community aesthetics are maintained through appropriate regulations. o Policy LU-11.1: Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign Ordinance in order to provide for a reasonable system of review and incentives for well-designed signs throughout the City. • Goal LU-13: Take full advantage of view lines and vista points with carefully designed development. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-5 Page 299 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 o Policy LU-13.1: On north-south roadways, open space corridors, and other locations where there are views of scenic resources, trees, and structures, encourage framing and orientation of such views at key locations, and endeavor to keep obstruction of views to a minimum. The design of the proposed development would be compatible with the aforementioned zoning regulations and General Plan goals and policies, and would also be consistent with the existing style of the surrounding neighborhoods. As part of the Project, landscaping would improve Project site conditions and enhance views of the site from adjacent properties. The construction materials, colors, and vegetation incorporated into the Project's design would complement nearby scenic resources and maintain visual cohesion with hillside development to the north. As discussed above in Response 4.1(a), the proposed Project would not interfere with scenic views of mountains to the north. Additionally, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a disruption to the existing patterns and scales among surrounding developments and would be visually cohesive with surrounding residential neighborhoods. The maximum height of the proposed Project would be approximately 42 ft and therefore would be consistent with the scale of surrounding residential development. Furthermore, all signs would be approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department and would conform to the Uniform Sign Program. Overall, improvements associated with the proposed Project are anticipated to improve the existing visual character of the Project site and would serve to provide increased visual cohesion between the Project site and the surrounding area. Summary. In summary, the proposed Project would develop the Project site with a mixed-use community that would enhance the visual quality and character of the site. The proposed Project would be consistent with the height, scale, and design of developments within the vicinity of the Project site and, consequently, would not fundamentally alter the surrounding land use character. In addition, following approval of the Zoning Map change and Development Code Amendment, the zoning classification and land use designation associated with the Project site would be consistent with the proposed use. The proposed Project would also be consistent with all development regulations and General Plan goals and policies pertaining to the visual character of the proposed mixed-use development. For the reasons stated above, the proposed Project would not degrade the visual character of the planning area or conflict with applicable zoning and General Plan regulations governing scenic quality, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? The impact of nighttime lighting depends on the type of use affected, the proximity to the affected use, the intensity of specific lighting, and the background or ambient level of the combined nighttime lighting. Nighttime ambient light levels may vary considerably depending on the age, condition, and abundance of point-of-light sources present in a particular view. The use of exterior 4.-6 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cag 6e/1yk INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J lighting for security and aesthetic illumination of architectural features may contribute to ambient nighttime lighting conditions. The spillover of light onto adjacent properties has the potential to interfere with certain activities, including vision, sleep, privacy, and general enjoyment of the natural nighttime condition. Light- sensitive uses include residential uses, some commercial and institutional uses, and, in some situations, natural areas. Changes in nighttime lighting may become significant if a proposed project would substantially increase ambient lighting conditions beyond its property line and project lighting would routinely spill over into adjacent light-sensitive land use areas. Reflective light (glare) is caused by sunlight or artificial light reflecting from finished surfaces (e.g.,window glass) or other reflective materials. Glass and other materials can have many different reflectance characteristics. Buildings constructed of highly reflective materials from which the sun reflects at a low angle commonly cause adverse glare. Reflective light is common in urban areas. Glare generally does not result in the illumination of off-site locations but results in a visible source of light viewable from a distance. Nighttime illumination impacts are evaluated in terms of the Project's net change in ambient lighting conditions and proximity to light-sensitive land uses. The Project site is currently undeveloped and vacant. The Project site is predominantly surrounded by residential and commercial uses, and by vacant land. Sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the site include residential uses to the north, east, and south of the site. Other sources of light on and adjacent to the Project site include exterior lighting from adjacent residential neighborhoods, Garcia Park to the northwest of the Project site, streetlights, and vehicle headlights. Construction. Construction activities would occur primarily during daylight hours. For the purposes of this analysis, an 8-hour construction day is assumed (from roughly 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.). Any construction-related illumination during evening and nighttime hours would be shielded to the extent feasible, would consist of the minimum lighting required for safety and security purposes only, and would occur only for the duration required for the temporary construction process. Due to its limited scope and short duration, light resulting from construction activities would not substantially impact sensitive uses, substantially alter the character of off-site areas surrounding the construction area, or interfere with the performance of an off-site activity. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area, and light impacts associated with construction would be less than significant. Operation. The proposed Project would be located within a developed area of Rancho Cucamonga, which currently emits lighting typical for an urban area (i.e., residential uses). Although the Project is considered a mixed-use development, the majority of the Project would consist of residential uses. As such, the proposed Project would introduce new sources of light to the Project site that are typical of residential uses. According to the Photometric Plan for the proposed Project (refer to Figure 4.1.1, Conceptual Photometric Plan, outdoor lighting proposed as part of the Project would include 105-watt parking lot pole lighting (15 ft in height), 65-watt decorative pole lighting (15 ft in height), and 12-watt decorative wall mounted lighting. All outdoor lighting would be directed PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-7 Page 301 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 4.8 P:\STR1901-West bu ry\I Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISM ND Clean.cigca<g 66/1�/�QZ> LEGEND O � KriW IED EFT PaRla16 LOT POLE IIRLR BLDGI TYPE N FORWARD TF40VI LRam.IG OBTRBUIIO,•1 L6 ARCHIECILRAL LIRHT'p vPIIBARffiNff-<&8?TOOMA-WW#gTpN 9B50R POlE,SKTSiSAii ALIAfIlA BASE COVH° 3000 OE6•k�K .� M-O..OR/FNSN seECT®k3Y O'M82 b ba'v xb�a',L � K)5W LHl ISFT PARIVJG LOT FOIE LM,M � 'Y •a ® ❑ TYPE.L1GNi1°G gSTRBIPION ba 30 41 ll6 pgCMECTtRpL L16e+Byly aRIInAPIID►t7T-a&BYTOCMA-NhViAOTION SE•604 POLE aSNTbi54iV b: ba to Pl.l.°.T11.1 gpyE COYH2 -- ^m h, 3000 DEtSff K •11. ` a.1y 'u .COLORrTNB,SflECT®BY OwnH° },"�C`�. ho ASW I.®GFT DECORATNE POLE NBVIT ie v,\',.,' a�/�a OO W TTFE V IJGFITNG DBTRBUfION •t L • US ARGIIEC1lRAL LIGNINO '`•a�bit�'' ) �• PLLhTLM BASE COWS he h, •1x t 3000 OE6REE K .m ••CO_ORMJ9V ERECTED BY ONleH2 bA 1/. 65W L®EFT OECORATNE POE N6VR TIPEV m� a:4,a •,.,`• O �TYPE N IJ6V(RJG 06'lRBUIIOI. a�/'�./ US PRCH1EC1lRAL LI6HINCi h,he �`e�"O-f'\a KiaifL�N-4am525AM-WN b. �+a aba POtE mNrs+saa+ LT hT'm to Pllhi•LM BASE COWS° , \ba \ 3000K t ba'm SLOG G• J � ..Cd-ORRiJEN EHECIED BY O'MEit • ann 'tee \•t a �•\\ /v • u •� HIX19E SOE ENE1D 'm•, h m ' •�1.✓ \ -S' R98i TO 91E RAN FOR LOCATKNS BLOG7 'oa., xr y, �>s \ ,� ® ! rnv LED DEOORATNE wAu.ueNr �` \ \ 13\ oPexAT®BY PiaoTocaL —J. OwnER e,1APITAI�,bqA ENWRC® TiPEV � t\1x 6RAM L®SERE$ BLO('6 �\l � \\\ ••CO_ORiFMw 5a£OTt�Br a++b� .m WEf LOCATKY•L LL LISTED TIw/V b ' ! B4DG4 TYPE// •��a �, ss •° �`v BLOG7 /V y '1�a•v/ •,a\o' �u.,a:�a\ \\ I } i • � ba' h a e o bai BLOGS4 1 a 7• �� . uh�•a , h �.'�a �\ a , SWIG • TY)fl ,aho g(pGg e v�kL /V BLDG7 I ✓ e +.e b' L BLDG 66 G9 ff .b : ° \\\ \e,m ba bs/• I \u mbar r 6B be•m'rs aT roa ,a m ., ,a ,a m ,x ,a m i i b i ,. ., �9�� Viz\., a, m ba m �• ,a ba ,. ,a,.•„ •m ,a •m a a ,.� — � '° a � � '�> '•e�'a vv`v J.�.: _ _h� �s1t eta rxs �\•1 �� /� y BLDG3 BLDG2 � L SA FIGURE 4.1.1 0 45 90 Westbury Residential Project FEET Conceptual Photometric Plan SOURCE:LDB Inc. I:\STR1901\G\Photometric Plan.cdr(7/1/2019) Page 303 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 4.10 P:\STR1901-West bu ry\I Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISM ND Clean.cigca<g 66/1604 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J downward and shielded to minimize off-site spill. Additionally, the location of all exterior lighting would comply with lighting standards established in Chapter 17.58, Outdoor Lighting Standards, of the City's Municipal Code. Impacts related to glare from on-site lighting would not occur because the exterior building materials and facade would not include highly reflective materials (e.g.,windows or glass with mirror-like tints) As specified in Regulatory Compliance Measure (RCM) AES-1, the proposed Project would be required to comply with lighting standards described in the Photometric Plan. Although the proposed Project is not anticipated to incorporate design features that would result in excessive lighting or the generation of glare on the site, the Photometric Plan and any other lighting plans are subject to City review and approval as part of the site plan review process. Therefore, lighting provided as part of the proposed Project would be largely consistent with the type and intensity of existing lighting in the Project vicinity. The final lighting for the Project would be subject to City review and approval as part of the site plan review process, and would be implemented in compliance with the City's Municipal Code. As such,the proposed Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project would be required to adhere to relevant sections of the City's Municipal Code as described in RCM-AES-1. RCM-AES-1 Final Lighting and Photometric Plans. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit Final Lighting and Photometric Plans for review and approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee. The lighting and photometric plans shall be prepared by a qualified engineer (i.e., an engineer who is an active member of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) and shall comply with applicable standards of the City's Municipal Code. The lighting plan shall address all aspects of lighting, including infrastructure, on-site driveways, recreation, safety, signage, and promotional lighting, if any. In accordance with Municipal Code Section 17.58, Outdoor Lighting Standards, the Final Photometric Plan shall show evidence that all lighting is shielded or recessed and directed downward and away from adjoining properties and rights-of-way. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 30 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring ❑ ❑ ❑ Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Impact Analysis a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? The Project site is not used for agricultural production and is not designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency.' Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding region contain very little Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 8 California Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder. 2016. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/(accessed May 9, 2019). 4-12 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Farmland of Statewide importance. The closest farmland to the Project site is 1.17 mi north of the Project site near the intersection of East Avenue and the Pacific Electric Trail. As discussed in the Phase I ESA, historical aerial photos show that the northern and southern adjacent properties contained an orchard with residential and farm buildings until about 1966, and that the eastern, western, and southwestern adjacent properties contained vineyards until about 1967. Currently, the area surrounding the Project site, including the adjacent property to the north and south, is developed with residential and commercial uses. Implementation of the proposed Project would introduce a similar land use to the area. The proposed Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or any other type of farmland to a non- agricultural use. Therefore, no impacts to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? The Project site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is located within the FBOD. The Project site is not used for agricultural production and is not protected by, or eligible for, a Williamson Act contract. The Project area consists of Urban and Built-Up Land, and the Project site itself is non-enrolled land (land not enrolled in a Williamson Act contract and not mapped by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program).' There is no agriculturally zoned land or land under a Williamson Act contract in Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, no impacts to agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? The Project site is not used for timberland production, is not zoned as forest land or timberland, and does not contain forest land or timberland. The Project site is in an urban, built-out portion of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no forest or timberland resources in the vicinity of the Project site. The proposed Project would not convert forest land to nonforest use. Therefore, no impacts to forest land or timberland would occur, and no mitigation is required. 9 California Department of Conservation. 2017. Division of Land Resource Protection. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 3074-13 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forestland to non-forest use? The proposed Project was previously rough graded and is currently undeveloped. The proposed Project would not convert forest land to a nonforest use. Likewise, the Project site would not contribute to environmental changes that could result in conversion of forest land to nonforest use. Therefore, no impacts to forest land would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? The Project site is currently zoned Community Commercial (CC) and is located within the FBOD. The Project site is not used for agricultural production or designated or zoned for agricultural uses. The proposed Project would not convert farmland to a non-agricultural use. Likewise, the proposed Project site would not contribute to environmental changes that could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. As previously discussed in Response 4.2(a), adjacent properties were previously developed with agricultural uses such as orchards and vineyards. These properties are currently developed with residential and commercial uses. Therefore, no impact to farmland or forest land would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 4-14 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.3 AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ❑ ❑ ® ❑ air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- ❑ ❑ ® ❑ attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) ❑ ❑ ® ❑ adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Discussion An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis for the proposed Project was prepared in March 2018.10 The analysis in this section is based on the findings of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Appendix A). Impact Analysis a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The proposed Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin).The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the regional government agency that monitors and regulates air pollution within the Basin. The Federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act mandate the control and reduction of specific air pollutants. Under these acts, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) have established ambient air quality standards for specific "criteria" pollutants, designed to protect public health and welfare. Primary criteria pollutants include carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter (PM1o), sulfur oxides (SOx), and lead. Secondary criteria pollutants include ozone (03) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). These ambient air quality standards are levels of contaminants which represent safe levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each criteria pollutant. An Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) describes air pollution control strategies to be undertaken by a city or county in a region classified as a nonattainment area to meet the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act. The main purpose of an AQMP is to bring an area into compliance with the 10 LSA.2018.Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis. March. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-15 Page 309 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 requirements of federal and State ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The applicable air quality plan is the SCAQMD's adopted 2016 AQMP. The AQMP is based on regional growth projections developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Only new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significantly unique projects need to undergo a consistency review due to the air quality plan strategy being based on projections from local General Plans. Because the AQMP is based on regional growth projections developed by SCAG, projects that are deemed consistent with a specific General Plan are usually found to be consistent with the AQMP. While the proposed mixed-use development would require a Development Code and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning designation, land use tables, and figures from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) District, the proposed use of the site is consistent with the City's General Plan designation of mixed-use. Additionally, rezoning the property from Commercial to Mixed Use would result in a less intensive use with regard to vehicle trips, and the mixed-use project would be consistent with the policies provided in SCAG's RTP/SCS that promote walkable communities (e.g., new residential uses located near transit stops along Foothill Boulevard and neighborhood stores). The City's General Plan is consistent with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan Guidelines and the SCAQMD AQMP. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the Basin 2016 AQMP is affirmed when a project (1) does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation, and (2) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP.11 Consistency review is presented below. 1. The proposed Project would result in short-term construction and long-term pollutant emissions that are less than the CEQA significance emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, as demonstrated above.Therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of any air quality standards violation and would not cause a new air quality standards violation. 2. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant projects. Significant projects include airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil drilling districts,water ports, solid waste disposal sites, and offshore drilling facilities.Therefore, the proposed Project is not defined as significant for the purposes of the AQMP consistency analysis. Based on the analysis presented above, the proposed Project is consistent with the City's General Plan and the regional AQMP. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan and would result in a less than significant impact. No mitigation is required. 11 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ceqa-air- quality-handbook-(1993) (accessed June 24, 2019). 4-16 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1M INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? The Basin is currently designated nonattainment for the federal and State standards for 03 and PM2.5. In addition, the Basin is in nonattainment for the PM10 standard. The Basin's nonattainment status is attributed to the region's development history. Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region's adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis. By its very nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of AAQS. Instead, a project's individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project's contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable,then the project's impact on air quality would be considered significant. In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, the SCAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project's individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. If a project exceeds the identified significance thresholds, its emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse air quality impacts to the region's existing air quality conditions. Therefore, additional analysis to assess cumulative impacts is not necessary. The following analysis assesses the potential project-level air quality impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project. Construction Emissions. Air quality impacts could occur during construction of the proposed Project due to soil disturbance and equipment exhaust. Major sources of emissions during grading and site preparation include: (1) exhaust emissions from construction vehicles, (2) equipment and fugitive dust generated by construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, and (3) soil disturbances from grading and backfilling. Potential pollutants include CO, NOx, VOCs, directly emitted particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM1o), and toxic air contaminants (TACs) such as diesel exhaust particulate matter. Project construction activities would include site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities. Construction-related effects on air quality from the proposed Project would be greatest during the site preparation phase due to the disturbance of soils. If not properly controlled, these activities would temporarily generate particulate emissions. Sources of fugitive dust would include disturbed soils at the construction site. Unless properly controlled, vehicles leaving the site would deposit dirt and mud on local streets, which could be an additional source of airborne dust after it dries. PM10 emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the nature and magnitude of construction activity and local weather conditions. PM10 emissions would depend on soil moisture, silt content of soil, wind speed, and the amount of operating equipment. Larger dust particles would settle near the source, while fine particles would be dispersed over greater distances from the construction site. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-17 Page 311 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Construction emissions were estimated for the proposed Project using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMOd), Version 2016.3.2, consistent with SCAQMD recommendations. For the purposes of this analysis, the construction schedule for the proposed Project was based on an expected September 2020 start date and June 2022 completion date. Rule 403 measures were included in the CalEEMod analysis. Construction-related emissions are presented in Table 4.3.A. Table 4.3.A: Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions Total Regional Pollutant Emissions(Ibs/day) Construction Phase Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust VOC NOx CO sox PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 Site Preparation 4 42 22 <1 7 2 4 2 Grading 3 26 17 <1 3 1 1 1 Building Construction 3 23 23 <1 2 1 <1 1 Paving 2 11 13 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Architectural Coating 47 2 3 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 Peak Daily 47 42 23 <1 9 6 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Emissions? No No No No No No Source:Compiled by LSA(March 2020). CO=carbon monoxide PM>,o=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size Ibs/day=pounds per day SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality Management District NOx=nitrogen oxides Sox=sulfur oxides PM2.S=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size VOC=volatile organic compounds The PM10 and PM2.5 fugitive dust emissions are included in Table 4.3.A. Fugitive dust emissions would be substantially reduced by compliance with SCAQMD Ruleand 403 (compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 is required for all projects in the Basin). The implementation of Rule 403 measures were accounted for in the Project construction emission estimates. Applicable requirements of Rule 403 included in the analysis are as follows: • Water active sites at least three times daily (locations where grading is to take place will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving). • Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, or maintain at least 2 ft (0.6 meter [m]) of freeboard (vertical space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code Section 23114. • Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 mph or less. Compliance with Rule 403 would reduce fugitive dust emissions associated with Project construction to a less than significant level. In addition to dust-related PM10 emissions, heavy trucks and construction equipment powered by gasoline and diesel engines would generate CO, SO, NO, VOCs and some soot particulate (PM2.5 and PM1o) in exhaust emissions. If construction activities were to increase traffic congestion in the area, CO and other emissions from traffic would increase slightly while those vehicles idle in traffic. These emissions would be temporary in nature and limited to the immediate area surrounding the construction site. 4-18 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage M INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J As shown in Table 4.3.A, construction emissions associated with the Project would be less than significant for VOC, NO, CO, SO, PM2.5, and PM10 exhaust emissions. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Operational Emissions. Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with mobile sources (e.g., vehicle trips), energy sources (e.g., electricity and natural gas), and area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment) related to the proposed Project. PM10 emissions result from running exhaust, tire and brake wear, and the entrainment of dust into the atmosphere from vehicles traveling on paved roadways. Entrainment of PM10 occurs when vehicle tires pulverize small rocks and pavement and the vehicle wakes generate airborne dust. The contribution of tire and brake wear is small compared to the other particulate matter emission processes. Gasoline-powered engines have small rates of particulate matter emissions compared with diesel-powered vehicles. Energy source emissions result from activities in buildings for which electricity and natural gas are used. The quantity of emissions is the product of usage intensity (i.e., the amount of electricity or natural gas) and the emission factor of the fuel source. Major sources of energy demand for the proposed Project could include building mechanical systems, such as heating and air conditioning, lighting, and plug-in electronics, such as refrigerators or computers. Greater building or appliance efficiency reduces the amount of energy for a given activity and thus lowers the resultant emissions. The emission factor is determined by the fuel source, with cleaner energy sources like renewable energy producing fewer emissions than conventional sources. The Project would comply with the 2019 California Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24), including the major energy efficiency measures that are now required in all homes.The project would incorporate the following in building plans as a project design feature: • Solar photovoltaic systems shall be installed. • Low-emission water heaters shall be used. Solar water heaters are encouraged. • Exterior windows shall utilize window treatments for efficient energy conservation. The 2019 Title 24 standards also encourage demand responsive technologies including battery storage, heat pump water heaters, and building thermal envelope improvements through high performance attics, walls, and windows to improve comfort and energy savings. Typically, area-source emissions consist of direct sources of air emissions located at the Project site, including architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment. Area-source emissions associated with the Project would include emissions from the use of architectural coatings, consumer products, and landscaping equipment. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-19 Page 313 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed Project were calculated using CalEEMOd. Based on trip generation factors provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed Project, the Project would generate 1,035 daily trips.12 These trips were entered in CalEEMod and the fleet mixes adjusted to represent the expected vehicle mix for each land use.The modeling is compliant with SCAQMD Rule 445 and assumes that there would be no wood stoves and all fireplaces would be natural gas-fueled. The long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed Project are shown in Table 4.3.B. Table 4.3.13: Opening Year Regional Operational Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions(Ibs/day) VOCs NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5 Area 3 2 12 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile 2 2 23 <1 8 2 Total Project Emissions 5 4 35 <1 8 2 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant? No No No No No No Source:Compiled by LSA(March 2020). CO=carbon monoxide PM>,o=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size Ibs/day=pounds per day SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality Management District NOS=nitrogen oxides SOS=sulfur oxides PM2.S=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size VOC=volatile organic compounds The results shown in Table 4.3.13 indicate the proposed Project would not exceed the significance criteria for daily VOC, NO, CO, SO, PM1o, or PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, operation of the proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Localized Significance Analysis. The SCAQMD published its Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology in July 2008, recommending that all air quality analyses include an assessment of air quality impacts to nearby sensitive receptors.13 This guidance was used to analyze potential localized air quality impacts associated with construction of the proposed Project. Localized significance thresholds (LSTs) are developed based on the size or total area of the emission source, the ambient air quality in the source receptor area (SRA), and the distance to the project. The SCAQMD defines structures that house persons (e.g., children, the elderly, persons with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage in frequent exercise) or places where they gather (i.e., residences, schools, playgrounds, child-care centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, and athletic fields) as sensitive receptors. LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project SRA and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. SCAQMD provides LST screening tables for 25 m, 50 m, 100 m, 200 m, and 500 m source- receptor distances. The closest existing sensitive receptors are residences across East Avenue, approximately 80 ft from the closest construction operations. 12 Fehr&Peers. 2018. Draft Westbury Transportation Impact Study. February. 13 SCAQMD.2008.Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July. 4-20 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage Nl INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J For the proposed Project, the appropriate SRA for the LST is the Northwest San Bernardino Valley area (SRA 32). The total area of the proposed Project is 3.76 ac. Based on SCAQMD methodology and the construction equipment planned, it is possible that the entire 3.76 ac could be disturbed on a peak day; thus, the 2 ac and 5 ac construction thresholds have been interpolated to derive 3.76 ac LSTs for construction emissions. For LST impacts, the SCAQMD guidance specifies that only on-site emissions are to be included. The CalEEMod construction results are delineated as on- or off-site. However, the CalEEMod operation results only show on- and off-site emissions combined. On-site operational emissions would primarily occur from stationary sources. While vehicle emissions would be the largest source of Project-related operational emissions, only a small portion would occur on the site. Based on anticipated travel routes, it is estimated that less than 5 percent of the overall vehicle travel would occur on site. A total of 5 percent is considered conservative because the following average trip lengths are assumed from the CalEEMod defaults: (1) 14.7 miles for home to work, (2) 5.9 miles for home to shopping, and (3) 8.7 miles for other types of trips. The average on- site distance driven is unlikely to be even 1,000 ft, which is approximately 2 percent of the total miles traveled. Considering the total trip length included in the CalEEMod,the 5 percent assumption is conservative. Project construction emissions were compared to the LST screening tables in SRA 32, based on a 80 ft source-receptor distance and a 3.76 ac Project size. The results of the LST analysis, summarized in Tables 4.3.0 and 4.3.D, indicate that the proposed Project would not result in an exceedance of a SCAQMD LST during Project construction or operation. Therefore,the proposed Project would result in less than significant localized air quality impacts during construction and operation and no mitigation is required. Table 4.3.C: Construction Localized Impacts Analysis Emissions Sources Pollutant Emissions(Ibs/day) NOx c0 PM10 PMz.s On-Site Emissions 42 22 9 6 LSTs 229 1,796 12 7 Significant Emissions? No No No No Source:Compiled by LSA(March 2020). Note:Source Receptor Area—Northwest San Bernardino Valley,3.76 acres,receptors at 80 feet CO=carbon monoxide NI=nitrogen oxides Ibs/day=pounds per day PM2.5=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size LST=local significance threshold PM,.=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size Table 4.3.D: Long-Term Operational Localized Impacts Analysis Pollutant Emissions(Ibs/day) Emissions Sources NOx c0 PM10 PMz.s On-Site Emissions 2 13 <1 <1 LSTs 229 1,795 3 2 Significant Emissions? No No No No Source:Compiled by LSA(March 2020). Note:Source Receptor Area—Northwest San Bernardino Valley,3.76 acres,receptors at 150 feet,on-site traffic 5 percent of total. CO=carbon monoxide NOx=nitrogen oxides Ibs/day=pounds per day PM2.5=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size LST=localized significance thresholds PM D=particulate matter less than 10 microns in size P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 31 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? As identified above, the SCAQMD defines structures that house persons (e.g., children, the elderly, persons with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage in frequent exercise) or places where they gather (i.e., residences, schools, playgrounds, child-care centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, and athletic fields) as sensitive receptors. Sensitive receptors are defined as people who have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. The closest existing sensitive receptors are residences across East Avenue, approximately 80 ft from the closest construction operations. The off-road diesel construction equipment during grading and excavation activities emits most of the toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions during Project construction. Based on the SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic TACs are usually described in terms of "Individual Cancer Risk", which is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70-year lifetime would contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk-assessment. California regulations limit idling from both on-road and off-road diesel-powered equipment. CARB enforces idling limitations and compliance with diesel fleet regulations. • Minimize idling time either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the time of idling to 5 minutes [California Code of Regulations, Title 13, sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485]. Provide clear signage that posts this requirement for workers at the entrances to the site. • Provide current certificate(s) of compliance for CARB's In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation [California Code of Regulations,Title 13, sections 2449 and 2449.1]. Because the construction duration would last less than 2 years, and the phases that require the most heavy-duty diesel vehicle usage (e.g., grading) would last for a much shorter period of time (e.g., less than 1 month), Project construction would not result in a long-term (i.e., 70-year) substantial source of TAC emissions. In addition, the SCAQMD CEQA guidance does not require a health risk assessment for short-term construction emissions. It is therefore not necessary or meaningful to evaluate long-term cancer impacts from construction activities that take place over a relatively short duration.There would also be no residual TAC emissions after construction. As such, the Project's construction TAC emission impact would be less than significant. Construction of the proposed Project may expose sensitive receptors to airborne particulates, as well as a small quantity of construction equipment pollutants (i.e., usually diesel-fueled vehicles and equipment). However, construction contractors would be required to implement measures to reduce emissions by following SCAQMD standard construction practices. As shown in Table 4.3.0 and Table 4.3.D, the proposed Project would not result in significant localized emissions during construction or operation. Therefore, once the Project is constructed, it would not be a source of 4-22 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1ft INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J substantial pollutant emissions, and sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during Project construction or operation. This impact is considered less than significant and no mitigation is required. Vehicular trips associated with operation of the proposed Project would contribute to congestion at intersections and along roadway segments in the project vicinity. Localized air quality impacts could occur when emissions from vehicular traffic increase as a result of the proposed Project. The primary mobile-source pollutant of local concern is CO, a direct function of vehicle idling time and, thus, of traffic flow conditions. Reduced speeds and vehicular congestion at intersections result in increased CO emissions. As described in the Draft Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers 2018), all study area intersections currently operate at a satisfactory level of service (LOS). With the addition of the proposed Project in the existing setting and all future scenarios, vehicle speeds and vehicular congestion at all study area intersections surrounding the project site would continue to operate at satisfactory LOS. Therefore, the Project could be implemented in an existing setting with no significant peak-hour intersection impacts. Given the extremely low level of CO concentrations in the Project area and the lack of traffic impacts at any surrounding intersections, Project-related vehicles are not expected to contribute significantly to CO concentrations exceeding the State or federal CO standards. Because no CO hot-spot would occur, there would be no Project-related impacts on CO concentrations. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Heavy-duty equipment on the Project site during construction would emit odors, primarily from equipment exhaust. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed Project, and no mitigation measures are required. SCAQMD Rule 402 regarding nuisances states: "A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property." The proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. This impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 31 74-23 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California ❑ ❑ ❑ Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, ❑ ❑ ❑ vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with ❑ ® ❑ ❑ established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan,or ❑ ❑ ❑ other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion The following section is based on Results of a Biological/Regulatory Overview for an 11.45-Acre Property (APN# 1100-191-04) Located in Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (Biological Technical Report) (Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc., October 2016) and the Arborist Heritage Tree Inventory at Westbury Project in Rancho Cucamonga, California (Arborist Survey Report) (LSA, November 2017).These reports are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. 4-24 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage NQZ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Impact Analysis a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project site is currently undeveloped and vacant, with the exception of a cell tower and a building pad associated with a CVWD pumping station along the southern property line. The Project site is vacant but highly disturbed with low growth consisting mostly of nonnative vegetation. According to the Biological Technical Report (Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc., October 2016; Appendix B), the Project site is highly disturbed due to long-established land use practices on the site, including disking and mowing. The disturbed condition of the Project site is generally not suitable to support special-status species, and no known candidate, sensitive, or special-status species were observed inhabiting the Project site during the general survey. Special-Status Animals. Some special-status species have the potential to occur on site, including the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), Delhi sands flower-loving fly (DSF) (Rhaphiomidas terminatus abdominalis), Los Angeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus), San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus), coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma blainvillii), silvery legless lizard (Anniella pulchra pulchra), ferruginous hawk (euteo regalis), and loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus). According to the Biological Technical Report, most of these species have a low potential to occur on the Project site due to the lack of aquatic and/or suitable habitat and the highly disturbed nature of the Project site. Although most of the species known to occur within the Project vicinity have a low potential of occurring on the Project site, the results of the Biological Technical Report indicate that several endangered, candidate, sensitive, or special-status species may be present on the Project site. Based on visits to the Project site and a review of soil maps, the Project site contains Tujunga gravelly loamy sand (72 percent of the site) and Tujunga loamy sand (28 percent of the site), both of which are known to support the DSF, which is federally listed as Endangered. The Project site also contains annual bur-sage (Ambrosia acanthicarpa), California croton (Croton californicus), California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), sand aster (Corethrogyne glandulifera), and telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora) on site, all of which, as previously stated, have been documented to be associated with the presence of DSF. As such, the Applicant would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which itself requires the preparation of a DSF habitat assessment to ascertain the absence of DSF on the Project site. Compliance with Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce potential impacts to DSF to a less than significant level. According to the Biological Technical Report, the Project site also supports suitable habitat for the burrowing owl, which is a Federal and State Species of Special Concern. As such, implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would be required to minimize potential impacts to burrowing owls that may be present on site. Mitigation Measure BIO-2 requires the preparation of focused habitat surveys to confirm the presence/absence of burrowing owls on the Project site. If burrowing owls are determined to be present on the property, then the owls would need to be relocated following PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-25 Page 319 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 accepted California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) protocols. Compliance with Mitigation Measure 1310-2 would reduce potential impacts to burrowing owls to a less than significant level. The Biological Technical Report also concluded that the presence of the Los Angeles pocket mouse and San Bernardino kangaroo rat could not be ruled out on the Project site due to past mapping indicating the presence of both species in the Project area. Mitigation Measure 1310-3 requires a habitat assessment for small mammals to rule out the presence of sensitive small mammal species on the Project site, including the Los Angeles pocket mouse and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat. In the event the Los Angeles pocket mouse and San Bernardino kangaroo rat are identified on the site, Mitigation Measure 1310-3 outlines protocols to be followed to mitigate potential impacts to both species. There is low to moderate potential for the coast horned lizard or the silvery legless lizard to occur on site. Nevertheless, Mitigation Measure 1310-4 requires a visual survey and avoidance if construction is performed at at time of year when reptiles are active on the Project site. With implementation of 1310-4, impacts to non-listed special-status reptiles would be less than significant. Special-Status Habitat/Vegetation. Although the Project site has the potential to contain sensitive animal species, the subject property is highly disturbed and does not support any special-status plants due to a lack of suitable habitat. According to the Biological Technical Report, the special- status plants evaluated for the property require habitat that is not present on the Project site. Additionally, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species does not identify any locations of critical habitat within approximately 2 mi of the Project site.14 The closest known critical habitat is approximately 2 mi to the north of the Project site."Therefore, no impacts to sensitive or special-status species would result from implementation of the proposed Project, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: 1310-1 Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Surveys. Prior to grading or any other ground- disturbing activity, a qualified biologist (i.e., a permitted Delhi Sands flower-loving fly [DSF] biologist) shall conduct a survey for DSF habitat to determine if focused surveys for DSF are required. If focused DSF surveys are determined to be required, the Project Applicant will be required to conduct focused DSF surveys in accordance with United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Interim General Survey Guidelines for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (1996). USFWS protocol requires surveys to be conducted over the course of 2 consecutive years to confirm the 14 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species Webviewer. https://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4f e09893cf75b8dbfb77(accessed May 24,2019). is The closest known critical habitat is within the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains and contains San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat. 4-26 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. ge 6/cal/ QZ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J absence of DSF. If no DSF habitat is observed on site during the pre-construction survey, a letter shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to issuance of any grading permits, and no further action is required. If DSF is observed to be present on site during the pre-construction clearance survey, consultation with the USFWS shall occur to determine the next appropriate steps. Areas currently occupied by DSF habitat shall be avoided to the extent feasible. If DSF habitat cannot be avoided, replacement of habitat at a 1:1 ratio, or as required by the USFWS, shall be implemented. Project effects to DSF must be fully mitigated through avoidance or the replacement of habitat on or off site in coordination with the USFWS and the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. B10-2 Burrowing Owl Surveys. Prior to grading or any other ground-disturbing activity, a qualified biologist shall conduct a habitat assessment for burrowing owls to determine if suitable burrowing owl habitat is present in and adjacent to the Project site. If suitable habitat is present,then focused breeding season surveys shall be conducted consistent with the procedures outlined in Appendix D of the 2012 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW Staff Report). Regardless of whether burrowing owls are detected during focused breeding season surveys, a pre-construction survey shall be performed by a qualified biologist no less than 14 days prior to ground-disturbing activities. If no burrowing owls are observed on site during the pre-construction clearance survey, a letter shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey.The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to issuance of any grading permits, and no further action is required. If presence of burrowing owl is determined either during the focused breeding season surveys or pre-construction surveys,the applicant shall contact CDFW prior to commencing project activities and conduct an impact assessment to determine appropriate mitigation in accordance with the CDFW Staff Report. If one or more burrowing owls are observed on site during the pre-construction clearance survey, and permanent avoidance of the owl(s) by the project is not feasible,then the occupied area shall be avoided with an appropriate setback buffer as determined by the qualified biologist until either the burrowing owl(s) can be excluded from the site (subject to CDFW approval) or the owls leave the site on their own. In accordance with the CDFW Staff Report,the size of the setback buffer should be in the range of 50 meters to 500 meters and will be determined through a combination of the extent of owl use (i.e., nesting sites versus non-breeding use), the time of year, and the level of disturbance. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-27 Page 321 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 If burrowing owls cannot be avoided by the proposed Project a qualified biologist shall prepare and submit a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan to CDFW in accordance with Appendix E of the CDFW Staff Report for review/approval prior to the commencement of disturbance activities onsite. Burrow exclusion involves the installation of one-way doors in burrow openings during the nonbreeding season to temporarily or permanently exclude burrowing owls and to close burrows after verifying through site monitoring and scoping that the burrows are empty. Existing or artificial burrows situated less than 75 meters from the Project site are the ideal scenario for successful passive relocation. Additional factors for successful passive relocation are included in the CDFW Staff Report; however, if adjacent lands are not available then alternate mitigation will be identified. When a qualified biologist determines that burrowing owls are no longer occupying the Project site and passive relocation is complete, construction activities may continue. A final letter report shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the passive relocation. The letter shall be submitted to CDFW and the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. If mitigation will include the conservation of adjacent or offsite lands for burrowing owls, then the Applicant will coordinate with CDFW and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that the permanent conservation and management of burrowing owl habitat is addressed such that the habitat acreage, number of burrows and burrowing owl impacts are replaced consistent with the CDFW Staff Report. A qualified biologist shall confirm that conservation lands contain natural unoccupied burrows at a 2:1 replacement ratio, or otherwise the biologist will construct artificial burrows for use by the owls. Monitoring and management of the replacement burrow site(s) shall be conducted and a reporting plan shall be prepared. The objective shall be to manage the replacement burrow sites for the benefit of burrowing owls (e.g., minimizing weed cover), with the specific goal of maintaining the functionality of the burrows for a minimum of 2 years. 11310-3: Los Angeles Pocket Mouse and San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Surveys. Prior to grading or any other ground-disturbing activity, a qualified biologist (i.e., a permitted biologist allowed to handle the Los Angeles pocket mouse [LAPM] and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat [SBKR]) shall conduct a survey to identify suitable habitat for the LAPM and the SBKR. Should suitable habitat be identified on the site, the qualified biologist shall conduct a minimum of 5 nights of small mammal trapping consecutively, in accordance with protocol established by the USFWS and the CDFW. A final letter report shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey and any mitigation measures that are recommended to be implemented as part of the Project, if such measures are required. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. 4-28 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1�/ Q� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J If the Los Angeles pocket mouse is identified on the site, the qualified mammal biologist shall provide an analysis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as to whether the loss of occupied habitat would "have a substantial adverse effect" on the overall species to determine whether mitigation is warranted. If mitigation is necessary to offset a potentially significant impact, then mitigation of no less than 2:1 (replacement to impact) shall be required. Additionally, the Project Applicant/Developer shall prepare and implement a set of avoidance and minimization measures aimed at protecting special-status small mammals from project-related impacts. The proposed avoidance and minimization measures shall be provided to CDFW for review and approval no fewer than 30 days prior to the initiation of project activities. If the San Bernardino kangaroo rat is identified on the site, take authorization must be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and so the Project Applicant/Developer shall consult with the USFWS. The USFWS shall identify measures to be taken to avoid or minimize adverse Project effects to these species and their habitat. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) avoidance of the occupied habitat, (2) enhancement of habitat, or (3) conservation of off-site suitable habitat, or any other measures as determined by USFWS. At present the SBKR is designated as a Candidate Endangered species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). If the SBKR is still protected under CESA at the time of construction, then in addition to take authorization from USFWS, an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) will be required from CDFW pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2080.1. If applicable, the Project Applicant/Developer will coordinate with CDFW to obtain an ITP, including to ensure that the habitat mitigation determined through consultation with USFWS will also satisfy CDFW. 11310-4 Non-listed Special-Status Reptiles. If construction will be performed at a time of year when reptiles are active at the Project area, i.e. Spring or Summer, a qualified biologist shall visually survey the Project area prior to construction to identify any feature/habitats suitable to support special-status reptiles (i.e., burrows, dens, cavities, debris, dead vegetation, rocks, loose soil, leaf litter, etc.). Where an identifiable feature is present, the qualified biologist shall mark the potentially occupied feature for avoidance. If avoidance is infeasible, the qualified biologist shall carefully dismantle the feature and allow any individuals discovered to move out of harm's way, if such efforts are determined to be feasible and reasonable by the biologist. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project site is vacant but highly disturbed with low growth of mostly nonnative vegetation. Based on the results of database searches and field surveys conducted as part of the Biological PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-29 Page 323 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Technical Report, the Project site does not support any special-status or sensitive riparian habitat as identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or USFWS.Therefore, no significant impacts related to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities identified in a local or regional plan would result from Project implementation, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh,vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is currently proposing a State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State (State Wetlands Procedures, formerly known as the State Wetland and Riparian Area Protection Policy) (SWRCB 2019).The State Wetlands Procedures consist of four main components: (1) a wetland definition; (2) a framework for determining if a feature that meets the wetland definition is a water of the State; (3) wetland delineation procedures; and (4) procedures for the submittal, review, and approval of applications for Water Quality Certifications and Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for dredge or fill activities. In an effort to catalog the State's water resources, the California Aquatic Resources Inventory (CART) is being developed and includes a dataset of resources cataloged in the CARI that show there are no aquatic resources on the Project site or immediate vicinity.16 According to the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory, East Etiwanda Creek is approximately 400 ft east of the Project site across East Avenue. Additionally, a drainage basin lies approximately 530 ft west of the Project boundary.17 However, due to the distance from the proposed area of development to these aquatic resources, development of the Project site is unlikely to impact these nearby aquatic resources. The Project site is vacant but highly disturbed with low growth of mostly nonnative vegetation. According to the Biological Technical Report and the National Wetlands Inventory, the Project site does not contain federally protected wetlands,18 as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, nor does it contain State-protected wetlands, as defined by the State Wetlands Procedures. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 11 California Aquatic Resources Inventory. 2016. EcoAtlas: Existing Aquatic Resources. Website: https://www.ecoatlas.org/regions/ecoregion/south-coast(accessed June 13, 2019). 17 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. National Wetlands Inventory. Webviewer: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mapper.html 18 Ibid. 4-30 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. ge 6/caI/ l INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? The Project site is currently undeveloped but is located in an urban area. Because urban development surrounds the site, the proposed Project site does not function as a wildlife movement corridor. Species that are found on the site either fly onto the site or are able to navigate on the ground through long stretches of urban development. Therefore, the Project site does not contain any native resident or migratory fish, wildlife species, or wildlife corridors. In addition, no portion of the Project site or the immediately surrounding areas contains an open body of water that serves as a natural habitat in which fish could exist. The property contains vegetation (trees, shrubs, and herbaceous vegetation) with the potential to support nesting birds. The presence of vegetation with the potential to support nesting birds may represent a seasonal constraint to development if not removed at the appropriate time of the year. The proposed Project has the potential to impact active bird nests if vegetation and trees are removed during the nesting season. Nesting birds are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) (United States Code Title 33, Section 703 et seq.; see also Code of Federal Regulations Title 50, Part 10) and Section 3503 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would be subject to the provisions of the MBTA, which prohibits disturbing or destroying active nests. Project implementation must be accomplished in a manner that avoids impacts to active nests during the breeding season. Therefore, if Project construction occurs between February 1 and September 15, a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 3 days prior to ground- and/or vegetation-disturbing activities to confirm the absence of nesting birds. As documented in RCM-1310-1, avoidance of impacts can be accomplished through a variety of means, including establishing suitable buffers around any active nests. RCM-1310-1 would ensure that impacts to nesting birds would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project would be required to adhere to the MBTA and applicable sections of California Fish and Game Code, as detailed in RCM-1310-1. RCM-1310-1 Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Fish and Game Code Section 3503. In the event that construction, vegetation clearing, or grading activities (including disking and demolition) should occur between February 1 and September 15, the Project Applicant/Developer (or its contractor) shall retain a qualified biologist (i.e., a professional biologist who is familiar with local birds and their nesting behaviors) to conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 3 days prior to commencement of construction activities. The nesting survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project- related construction activities, such as noise, human activity, and dust, etc. If active nesting of birds is observed within 100 feet (ft) of the designated construction area prior to construction, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the active nests (e.g., as much as 500 ft for raptors and 300 ft for nonraptors [subject to the PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 32 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 recommendations of the qualified biologist]), and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans include specific documentation regarding the requirements stated above, that pre-construction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff, and that the appropriate buffers (if needed) are noted on the plans and established in the field with orange snow fencing. e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Section 17.16.080 of the City's Municipal Code requires that a tree removal permit be obtained for the removal of any tree considered to be a heritage tree. A heritage tree is defined as any tree that meets at least one of the following criteria: all eucalyptus windrows; any tree in excess of 30 ft tall and having a single trunk DBH of 20 inches or more; multi-trunk trees having a total DBH of 30 inches or more; a stand of trees, each of which depends on the others for survival; or any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant by the City Planning Director because of its age, size, condition, location, or aesthetic qualities. According to the Arborist Survey Report (LSA, November 2017; Appendix C), 33 trees identified on site would be removed as part of the proposed Project. Based on the results of the on-site tree inventory survey conducted for the Project, each of the assessed trees meet the City's requirements to be considered a heritage tree, either because the subject tree is part of a eucalyptus windrow or because it meets the size criteria of being both in excess of 30 ft tall and having a single trunk DBH of 20 inches or more, or having a combined multi-trunk DBH of 30 inches or more. As required by RCM-1310-2, the Applicant would obtain tree removal permits prior to the removal of any on-site trees and the issuance of any grading permits. With implementation of RCM-1310-2, potentially significant impacts related to tree removal would be less than significant. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measure: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project would be required to comply with the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code as described in RCM-1310-2. RCM-11310-2 Tree Replacement. Prior to issuance of grading permits or the removal of any on- site trees, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department Director, or designee, shall verify that the Project Applicant has obtained tree removal permits in accordance with the provisions outlined in Section 17.16.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. As outlined in Section 17.16.080 of the City's Municipal Code, a tree removal permit shall by required for the removal of all heritage trees on private properties within Rancho Cucamonga, unless expressly stated in Section 17.16.080 (Exceptions). 4-32 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. ge 6/calk INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped, but it is located in an urban area. The Project site is not located in or adjacent to an existing or proposed Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other approved local, regional, or State HCP. The City is a participant in the Draft Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Plan, which, among other goals, seeks to conserve as much of the Planning Area as rural open space and habitat conservation as feasible.19 However, the Project site is not within the Etiwanda Heights Conservation Plan area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or State HCP, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 19 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2019. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood &Conservation Plan. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 3274-33 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ ❑ historical resource pursuant to§15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an ❑ ® ❑ ❑ archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside ❑ ❑ ® ❑ of formal cemeteries? Discussion The following section is based on the Cultural Resources Assessment Report, Westbury, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino, California (Cultural Resources Assessment) (LSA, January 2018) and the Paleontological Analysis of the Westbury Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (Paleontological Resources Assessment) (LSA,January 2018). These reports are included in Appendices D and E, respectively. Impact Analysis a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to§15064.5? CEQA defines a "historical resource" as a resource that meets one more of the following criteria: (1) listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register); (2) listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5020.1(k); (3) identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g); or (4) determined to be a historical resource by a project's Lead Agency(PRC Section 21084.1 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[a]). The California Register defines a "historical resource" as a resource that meets one or more of the following criteria: 1. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns or local or regional history of the cultural heritage of California or the United States; 2. Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or 4. Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. 4-34 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J As detailed in the Cultural Resources Assessment (LSA, January 2018; Appendix D), a records search was conducted on November 13, 2017,to identify historic resources in the Project area. The records search was conducted by Isabela Kott at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System and California State University, Fullerton. The SCCIC houses the pertinent archaeological and historic site and survey information necessary to determine whether cultural resources are known to exist within the Project area. In addition, the California Points of Historical Interest, California Historical Landmarks, the California Register, the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), and the California State Historic Properties Directory listings were reviewed. The results of the records search indicate that three cultural studies have been conducted within portions of the Project area. The two closest resources to the Project site include one historic single- family residence and a historic road. Both historic resources are within 0.0125 mi of the site but are not located on the property.As such, there are no historical resources (as defined in §15065.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines) located on the Project site.Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to§15064.5? As previously stated, the Cultural Resources Assessment included a records search at the SCCIC to identify previously recorded historic and prehistoric resources in the Project area and previously completed cultural resources surveys and excavations within 1 mi of the Project site. The results of the records search indicated that three cultural resource surveys have been conducted within the Project area, with an additional 49 studies conducted outside the 1 mi radius. Previous cultural work in the area has resulted in 24 resources being recorded within 1 mi of the Project site; however, none of these resources are within the Project site boundaries. As previously stated, the two closest resources include a historic single-family residence and a historic road. In addition to a records search, an archaeological pedestrian survey of the entire Project site was conducted by LSA archaeologist Gini Austerman on November 26, 2017. The purpose of the field survey was to locate any known cultural resources, if present, and to determine their current status, update documentation, and identify any unrecorded cultural resources visible on the surface of the Project site. During the pedestrian survey, a scattering of modern trash was noted throughout the Project site and a row of nonnative windrow trees was noted along the southern and eastern boundaries. No evidence of previous residence buildings was noted. Although no cultural resources were identified on the site by the records search or during the field survey, historic maps indicated the Project area was developed as early as the 1890s and near the Project site prior to 1954. As such, archaeological monitoring during construction activities is required due to the possibility of disturbing unknown archaeological resources during ground- PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-35 Page 329 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 disturbing activities (Mitigation Measure CUL-1). If cultural resources are encountered during ground-disturbing work, construction activities in the area of the find will stop and the resource will be evaluated for significance. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce the impact of the proposed Project on the significance of archaeological resources to a less than significant level. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measure: CUL-1 Archaeological Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall provide a letter to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, from a qualified archaeologist (who meets Secretary of the Interior Standards) who has been retained to provide archaeological monitoring during ground-disturbing Project activities. The archaeologist shall attend the pre- grading meeting to establish procedures for an archaeological monitoring program. Those procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the archaeologist to potentially be historical resources or unique archaeological resources. These procedures shall be submitted to, reviewed by, and approved by the Director of Planning, or designee, prior to issuance of the grading permit and prior to any surface disturbance on the Project site. The archaeological monitor will be present and on site during all ground-disturbing activities. Should any cultural resources be discovered, no further grading shall occur in the immediate vicinity of the discovery (precise area to be determined by the archaeologist in the field, but shall be at least 50 feet) until the Director of Planning, or designee, is satisfied that the appropriate treatment of the resource has occurred. Any finds dating to the pre- contact period shall be also assessed by a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians— Kizh Nation to determine whether the find constitutes a "tribal cultural resource" as defined in PRC Section 21074 (as detailed in TRC-1). If significant pre-contact cultural resources, as defined by CEQA, are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation for review and comment, as detailed in TRC-1. An archaeological monitoring report shall be prepared following completion of archaeological monitoring, and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the South Central Coastal Information Center(SCCIC). Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. c) Would the project disturb any humans remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? There are no known human remains interred on the Project site. While the potential to encounter human remains is low, buried and undiscovered human remains may be present below the ground 4-36 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1yk INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J surface. Disturbing human remains could violate the State's Health and Safety Code as well as destroy the resource. In the unlikely event that human remains are encountered during ground- disturbing activities, the proper authorities would be notified in compliance with State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and PRC Section 5097.98, which require that no further disturbance occur in the event of a discovery or recognition of any human remains on site and that the County Coroner be notified immediately. The contractor, Developer, and County Coroner are required to comply with the provisions of California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 15064.5(e), PRC Section 5097.98, and Section 7050.5 of the State's Health and Safety Code. Compliance with these provisions (specified in RCM-CUL-1), would ensure that any potential impacts to unknown buried human remains would be less than significant by ensuring appropriate examination, treatment, and protection of human remains as required by State law. Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. However, RCM-CUL-1 is a standard condition based on State law related to the discovery of human remains. This Regulatory Compliance Measure is applicable to the proposed Project and shall be incorporated to ensure that the Project has minimal impacts related to unknown buried human remains. RCM-CUL-1 Human Remains. In the event that human remains are encountered on the Project site,work within 50 feet of the discovery shall be redirected and the County Coroner notified immediately, consistent with the requirements of California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 15064.5(e). State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which shall determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MILD). With the permission of the property owner, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted acess to the site. The MLD recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials, preservation of Native American human remains and associated items in place, relinquishment of Native American human remains and associated items to the descendants for treatment, or any other culturally appropriate treatment. Consistent with CCR Section 15064.5(d), if the remains are determined to be Native American and an MLD is notified, the City shall consult with the MLD as identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for treatment and disposition of the remains. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that all grading plans specify the requirements of CCR Section 15064.5(e), State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and PRC Section 5097.98, as stated above. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-37 Page 331 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.6 ENERGY Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ energy resources during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable ❑ ❑ ® ❑ energy or energy efficiency? Discussion The proposed Project would increase the demand for electricity, natural gas, and gasoline. The discussion and analysis provided below are based on data included in the CalEEMod output, which is included in Appendix A of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (provided in Appendix A of this report). Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? Construction-Period Energy Use. The anticipated construction schedule assumes that the proposed Project would be built over approximately 18 months. The proposed Project would require site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities during construction. Construction of the proposed Project would require energy for the manufacture and transportation of construction materials, preparation of the site for grading activities, and construction. Petroleum fuels (e.g., diesel and gasoline) would be the primary sources of energy for these activities. Based on the proposed Project's anticipated construction schedule and equipment, the proposed Project would consume 54,678 gallons of diesel fuel.20 Based on fuel consumption obtained from EMFAC2017, approximately 290.2 million gallons of diesel fuel would be consumed from vehicle trips in San Bernardino County in 2020. As such, construction of the proposed Project would increase the annual diesel fuel use in San Bernardino County by approximately 0.02 percent. As such, Project construction would have a negligible effect on local and regional energy supplies. Furthermore, construction activities are not anticipated to result in an inefficient use of energy, as gasoline and diesel fuel would be supplied by construction contractors who would conserve the use of their supplies to minimize their costs on the Project. Energy usage on the Project site during 20 California Air Resources Board, 2020. MSEI - Documentation - Off-Road - Diesel Equipment. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/mobile-source-emissions-inventory/road- documentation/msei-documentation-road (accessed March 2020). 4-38 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J construction would be temporary in nature and would be relatively small in comparison to the State's available energy sources. Therefore, construction energy impacts would be less than significant. Operational Energy Use. Energy consumed by the proposed Project would be associated with natural gas use, electricity consumption, and fuel used for vehicle trips associated with the Project. Energy and natural gas consumption was estimated for the Project using default energy intensities by building type in CaIEEMod. In addition, as discussed in Section 4.3, Air Quality, the proposed Project would comply with the 2019 California Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24) , including the major energy efficiency measures that are now required in all homes.The Project will incorporate the following in building plans as a project design feature: • Solar photovoltaic systems shall be installed. • Low-emission water heaters shall be used. Solar water heaters are encouraged. • Exterior windows shall utilize window treatments for efficient energy conservation. The 2019 Title 24 standards also encourage demand responsive technologies including battery storage and heat pump water heaters and building thermal envelope improvements through high performance attics, walls and windows to improve comfort and energy savings. The proposed Project's compliance with 2019 Title 24 standards was accounted for in CalEEMod. Electricity and natural gas usage estimates associated with the proposed Project are shown in Table 4.6.A. Table 4.6.A: Estimated Annual Energy Use of the Proposed Project Land Use Electricity Use Natural Gas Use Gasoline (kWh per year) (therms per year) (gallons per year) Apartments—Low-Rise 318,347 10,204 148,460 General Office Building' 5,819 21 2,155 Strip Mall 10,061 18 5,190 Parking Lot 35,000 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0 0 Total 369,227 10,243 155,805 Source:LSA(March 2020). 'The energy usage for general office buildings was used to calculate the energy usage for the four commercial-ready units. kWh=kilowatt-hour The proposed Project would also result in energy usage associated with gasoline to fuel Project- related trips. Based on the CaIEEMod analysis, the proposed Project would result in 3,427,738 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per year. The average fuel economy for light-duty vehicles (autos, pickups,vans, and SUVs) in the United States has steadily increased from about 14.9 miles per gallon (mpg) in 1980 to 22.0 mpg in 2015.21 Therefore, using the EPA fuel economy estimates for 2015, the 21 U.S. Department of Transportation. "Table 4-23: Average Fuel Efficiency of U.S. Light Duty Vehicles." Website: https://www.bts.gov/archive/publications/national_transportation_statistics/table_04_23/ (accessed June 2019). P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-39 Page 333 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 proposed Project would result in the consumption of approximately 155,805 gallons of gasoline per year. Table 4.6.A shows the estimated potential increased electricity, natural gas, and gasoline demand associated with the proposed Project. As shown in Table 4.6.A, the estimated potential increased electricity demand associated with the proposed Project is 369,227 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. In 2018, California consumed approximately 284,436 gigawatt-hours (GWh) (284,436,261,624 kWh).22 Of this total, San Bernardino County consumed 15,634 GWh (15,633,655,242 kWh).23 Therefore, electricity demand associated with the proposed Project would be less than 0.01 percent of San Bernardino County's total electricity demand. In addition, as shown in Table 4.6.A, the estimated potential increased natural gas demand associated with the proposed Project is 10,243 therms per year. In 2018, California consumed approximately 12,666 million therms or 12,666,389,562 therms, while San Bernardino County consumed approximately 500 million therms or 500,082,474 therms.24 Therefore, natural gas demand associated with the proposed Project would be less than 0.01 percent of San Bernardino County's total natural gas demand. The proposed Project would also result in energy usage associated with gasoline to fuel Project- related trips. As shown above in Table 4.6.A, vehicle trips associated with the proposed Project would consume approximately 155,804 gallons of gasoline per year. In 2015, vehicles in California consumed approximately 15.1 billion gallons of gasoline.25 Therefore,gasoline demand generated by vehicle trips associated with the proposed Project would be a minimal fraction of gasoline and diesel fuel consumption in California. The proposed Project would be constructed to 2019 Title 24 standards, which would help to reduce energy and natural gas consumption. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of fuel or energy and would incorporate renewable energy or energy efficiency measures into building design, equipment use, and transportation. Construction and operation-period impacts related to consumption of energy resources would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 22 California Energy Commission. 2018. Energy Consumption Data Management Service. Electricity Consumption by County. Website: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx (accessed March 2020). 23 Ibid. 24 Ibid. 25 California Energy Commission. 2017. California Gasoline Data, Facts, and Statistics. Website: http://www.energy.ca.gov/almanac/transportation_data/gasoline/(accessed June 2019). 4-40 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1fil INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? In 2002, the State Legislature passed Senate Bill (SB) 1389, which required the California Energy Commission (CEC) to develop an integrated energy plan every 2 years for electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuels, for the California Energy Policy Report. The plan calls for the State to assist in the transformation of the transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan identifies a number of strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators in implementing incentive programs for zero-emission vehicles and their infrastructure needs, and encouragement of urban designs that reduce VMT and accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access. The CEC recently adopted the 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report.26 The 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report provides the results of the CEC's assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues will require action if the State is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals while maintaining energy reliability and controlling costs.The 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report covers a broad range of topics, including implementation of SB 350, integrated resource planning, distributed energy resources, transportation electrification, solutions to increase resiliency in the electricity sector, energy efficiency, transportation electrification, barriers faced by disadvantaged communities, demand response, transmission and landscape-scale planning, the California Energy Demand Preliminary Forecast, the preliminary transportation energy demand forecast, renewable gas (in response to SB 1383), updates on Southern California electricity reliability, the natural gas outlook, and climate adaptation and resiliency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga relies on the State integrated energy plan and does not have its own local plan to address renewable energy or energy efficiency. As indicated above, energy usage on the Project site during construction would be temporary in nature. In addition, energy usage associated with operation of the proposed Project would be relatively small in comparison to the State's available energy sources, and energy impacts would be negligible at the regional level. Because California's energy conservation planning actions are conducted at a regional level, and because the Project's total impact on regional energy supplies would be minor, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct California's energy conservation plans as described in the CEC's 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. As shown above, the proposed Project would avoid the inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy and would not result in any irreversible or irretrievable commitments of energy. Potential impacts related to the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during Project construction or operation would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 26 California Energy Commission, 2019.2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission. Docket#19-IEPR-01. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 33 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based ❑ ❑ ❑ on other substantial evidence of a known fault?Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ® ❑ ❑ iii. Seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ iv. Landslides? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial direct ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems ❑ ❑ ❑ where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ® ❑ ❑ ❑ resource or site or unique geologic feature? Discussion The following section is based on the Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, West of East Avenue and Approximately 500 Feet North of Foothill Boulevard,APN 1100-191-04-000, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (Geotechnical Investigation) (Leighton and Associates, Inc., October 2016).This report is included in Appendix F. Impact Analysis a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? As with all of Southern California, the Project site is subject to strong ground motion resulting from earthquakes on nearby faults. There are, however, no known faults crossing the Project site. 4-42 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage 1�/ 0� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the closest mapped active faults is the Cucamonga Fault approximately 4.5 mi to the north. The San Bernardino section of the San Jacinto Fault Zone is also approximately 6.8 mi northeast of the site. The Project site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone. As such, the chance for surface fault rupture, during or as a consequence, of seismic activity is considered unlikely. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Map, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,or death involving: ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? The Project site, like all of Southern California, is in an active seismic region. Ground shaking resulting from earthquakes associated with both nearby and more distant faults is likely to occur. The Project site is located in the north-central portion of the Chino Basin, in the northern area of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province. As previously stated, the Project site is located approximately 4.5 mi south of the Cucamonga Fault Zone and 6.8 mi southwest of the San Bernardino section of the San Jacinto Fault Zone. As discussed in Response 4.6(a)(i,) the Project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. In addition to the Cucamonga Fault Zone and the San Bernardino section of the San Jacinto Fault Zone, there are five active faults within the region: (1) an un-named fault near Fontana; (2) the Red-Hill Etiwanda Avenue Fault; (3) the Sierra Madre Fault Zone; (4) the San Jose Fault; and (5) the Central Avenue Fault, which are 3.5, 3.6, 4.0, 13.9, and 14.1 mi from the Project site, respectively.27 During an earthquake along these faults or others, seismically induced ground shaking would be expected to occur. The severity of the shaking would be influenced by the distance of the site from the seismic source, the soil conditions, and the depth to groundwater. Ground shaking generated by fault movement is considered a potentially significant impact that may affect the proposed Project. Mitigation Measure GEO-1 requires that the Project Applicant comply with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation, the most current California Building Code (CBC), and the City Building Code, which stipulates appropriate seismic design provisions that shall be implemented with Project design and construction. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, potential Project impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be reduced to a less than significant level. 27 United States Geological Survey. U.S. Quaternary Faults Webviewer. Website: https://usgs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.htmI?id=5a6038b3a1684561a9b0aadf88412fcf (accessed March 9, 2020). PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 33 74-43 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measure: GEO-1 Compliance with the Recommendations in the Geotechnical Study. All grading operations and construction shall be conducted in conformance with all of the recommendations included in the geotechnical document prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc., titled Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, West of East Avenue and Approximately 500 Feet North of Foothill Boulevard, APN 1100-191-04-000, City of Rancho Cucamonga (October 5, 2016). Recommendations found in the geotechnical document address topics including, but not limited to: • General earthwork and grading, including site preparations, over-excavation and re-compaction, fill placement and compaction, importing of fill soil, shrinkage and subsidence, rippability, and oversized material; • Foundations, including minimum embedment and width, allowable bearing, lateral load resistance, increase in bearing and friction, and settlement estimates; • Slabs-on-grade, including subgrade moisture conditioning, concrete and structural design thickness, and slab underlayment for moisture vapor retarding; • Seismic design parameters; • Retaining walls; • Pavement design; and • Infiltration testing. Additional site grading, foundation, and utility plans shall be reviewed by the Project Geotechnical Consultant prior to construction to check for conformance with all of the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation (Leighton 2016). Grading plan review shall also be conducted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) City Engineer, or designee, prior to the start of grading to verify that requirements developed during the preparation of geotechnical documents have been appropriately incorporated into the Project plans. Design, grading, and construction shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City Building Code and the California Building Code (CBC) applicable at the time of grading, as well as the recommendations of the Project Geotechnical Consultant as summarized in the final Geotechnical Report subject to review by the City Engineer, or designee, prior to the start of grading activities. The final Geotechnical Report shall present the results of observation and testing done during grading activities. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. 4-44 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1YA INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,or death involving: iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Liquefaction commonly occurs when three conditions are present simultaneously: (1) high groundwater; (2) relatively loose, cohesion-lacking (sandy) soil; and (3) earthquake-generated seismic waves. Liquefaction effects can manifest in several ways, including (1) loss of bearing, (2) lateral spread, (3) dynamic settlement, and (4)flow failures. According to the Geology and Soils Element (2010c) of the City's General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR), only three small areas in the southwestern portion of Rancho Cucamonga have perched water conditions that could be subject to liquefaction. One of these areas, south of the Base Line Road and Hellman Road intersection in the southwestern portion of Rancho Cucamonga, is approximately 5.1 mi from the Project site. However, regional mapping indicates that much of the sediment in this area may be too dense to liquefy.28 The liquefaction susceptibility of the on-site subsurface soils was evaluated as part of the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed Project. The Geotechnical Investigation used a standard penetration test (SPT) to analyze the liquefaction potential on the Project site. SPT is an in- situ dynamic penetration test designed to provide information on the geotechnical engineering properties of soil. Based on this testing, current groundwater levels were identified deeper than 51.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). As such, the Geotechnical Investigation determined that the potential for liquefaction at the site was very low. Therefore, there would be no impact related to liquefaction, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,or death involving: iv. Landslides? Seismically induced landslides and other slope failures are common occurrences during or soon after earthquakes in areas with significant ground slopes. According to the Geology and Soils Element (2010c) of the City's General Plan, potential landslides or slope failure are expected in areas with steep slopes at the northwestern corner of Rancho Cucamonga. Steep slopes are found along Cucamonga Creek and at the foothills north of the city. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the site is relatively flat and lacks significant slopes. As such, the site is not considered susceptible to static slope instability or seismically induced 28 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010c. General Plan EIR.Chapter 4.7: Geology and Soils. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-45 Page 339 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 landslides. Therefore, the potential for impacts related to seismically induced landslides is less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? During construction of the proposed Project, soil would be exposed and there would be increased potential for soil erosion and siltation compared to existing conditions. During storm events, erosion and siltation could occur at an accelerated rate. The increased erosion potential could result in short-term water quality impacts as discussed in Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. As discussed in further detail in Section 4.10, the proposed Project would increase impervious surface area on the Project site to approximately 5 ac, which would increase the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff from the Project site. The remaining portion of the site would primarily be landscaping, which would minimize on-site erosion and siltation. As the Project site is relatively flat, soil erosion can be controlled via implementation of standard erosion control practices. Additionally, impervious surface areas associated with development of the Project site are not prone to erosion or siltation. Erosion and siltation would be minimal in the proposed landscaped areas. In the undeveloped areas, erosion and siltation would be similar to the existing condition. As discussed in RCM-WQ-1 in Section 4.10, the proposed Project would comply with the Construction General Permit, which requires preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and implementation of construction BMPs to reduce impacts to water quality during construction, including impacts associated with soil erosion and siltation. Furthermore,the exposure of soils during construction would be short-term and subject to requirements established by the NPDES. With incorporation of construction BMPs as required by RCM-WQ-1, impacts related to erosion during construction would be reduced to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures: No mitigation is required; refer to RCM-WQ-1. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Landslides and other forms of mass wasting, including mudflows, debris flows, and soil slips, occur as soil moves downslope under the influence of gravity. Landslides are frequently triggered by intense rainfall or seismic shaking. As described in Response 4.6(a)(iv), above, the Project site and 4-46 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1Y4QZ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J surrounding area lack natural slopes and are underlain by materials that are stable under static conditions; there is a very low potential for landsliding to occur from a seismic event. Moreover, the Project site is not within a State-designated hazard zone for seismically induced landslides.29 Although no indications of landslide activity or gross slope instability were observed at the Project site during the Geotechnical Investigation, grading activities during construction would produce temporary construction slopes in some areas. Unstable cut-and-fill slopes could create significant short-term and long-term hazards on and off site. All excavations must be performed in accordance with the City and State Building Codes and the State Division of Occupational Safety and Health requirements. Utility trenches would be supported either by layback excavations or shoring, in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards. Temporary backcuts, if required during removal of unsuitable soils, would be reviewed and approved by the Project Geotechnical Consultant. With implementation of the recommendations in the Geotechnical Investigation (as required in Mitigation Measure GEO-1), potential impacts related to slope instability would be reduced below a level of significance. Subsidence, the sinking of the land surface due to oil, gas, and water production, causes loss of pore pressures as the weight of the overburden compacts the underlying sediments. No subsidence associated with fluid withdrawal is known to have occurred on or in the vicinity of the Project site, and no mitigation is required."' As stated above in Response 4.6(a)(iii), with groundwater encountered at depths greater than 50 ft bgs,there is a very low potential for liquefaction to occur due to a seismic event. Therefore, impacts related to unstable soils would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Seismically induced settlement consists of dry dynamic settlement (above groundwater) and liquefaction-induced settlement (below groundwater). During a strong seismic event, seismically induced settlement can occur within loose to moderately dense sandy soil due to reduction in volume during, and shortly after, an earthquake event. Settlement caused by ground shaking is often non-uniformly distributed, which can result in differential settlement. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, on-site soils are susceptible to less than 1 inch of seismic settlement based on the maximum considered earthquake. Differential settlement due to seismic loading is assumed to be less than 0.5 inch over a horizontal distance of 40 ft based on the maximum considered earthquake. This level of seismic settlement does not present a significant risk for building collapse. Therefore, impacts related to seismically induced settlement would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure GEO-1. 29 California Department of Conservation. California Geological Survey. California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Webviewer. Website: https://maps. conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/(Accessed March 9, 2020). 30 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010c. General Plan EIR.Chapter 4.7: Geology and Soils. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-47 Page 341 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Expansive soils contain types of clay materials that occupy considerably more volume when they are wet or hydrated than when they are dry or dehydrated. Volume changes associated with changes in the moisture content of near-surface expansive soils can cause uplift or heave of the ground when they become wet or, less commonly, cause settlement when they dry out. Foundations constructed on these soils are subjected to large uplifting forces caused by the swelling. Based on laboratory testing in the Geotechnical Investigation, the soils on the Project site consist of granular materials (silty sand, coarse sand with gravel, and gravel with coarse sand). These soils are expected to have very low expansion potential. Therefore, impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The proposed Project does not include construction of septic tanks or connections to septic systems or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to the soil's capability to adequately support the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? In order to determine impacts on paleontological resources, a Paleontological Resources Assessment (LSA; January 2018) (Appendix E) was conducted for the Project. As part of this analysis, a locality search of the paleontological records maintained at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) was conducted. The results of the literature review indicate that the Project site is located at northern end of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province, a 900 mi long northwest-southeast-trending structural block that extends from the Transverse Ranges in the north to the tip of Baja California in the south and includes the Los Angeles Basin. Geologic mapping of the Project area indicates that the Project site contains late Holocene (less than 4,200 years ago) Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits to early Holocene to late Pleistocene (4,200 to 126,000 years ago) Young Alluvial Fan Deposits. Young Alluvial Fan Deposits consist of 4-48 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1�/ Q� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J unconsolidated silt, sand, and gravel. Cobble- and boulder-size clasts are also present and are more abundant closer to hills and mountains. Although Holocene deposits can contain remains of plants and animals, only those from the middle to early Holocene (4,200 to 11,700 years ago) are considered scientifically important. No records of fossils from the middle to early Holocene in the Project area are known at this time. However, these Holocene deposits overlie older Pleistocene deposits, which have produced scientifically important fossils elsewhere in the region. There is a potential to find these types of fossils in the older sediments below the Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits within the Young Alluvial Fan Deposits at depths of approximately 15 ft or more. As such, these deposits on the Project site have a low paleontological sensitivity above 15 ft and a high sensitivity below that mark. According to the locality search conducted by the LACM, there are no known fossil localities on the Project site. The locality search confirms that the Project site is underlain by deposits of younger Quaternary alluvium, which typically do not contain scientifically significant fossils in the uppermost layers but may produce important fossils at depth. The closest vertebrae locality in these older Quaternary deposits is LACM 7811, southwest of the Project site along Sumner Avenue north of Cloverdale Road. This locality produced a specimen of whipsnake at a depth of 9 to 11 ft bgs. The next closest locality is LACM 1207,further south of the Project site between Corona and Norco. That locality yielded a specimen of deer. Based on the findings of the fossil locality search, shallow excavations in the younger Quaternary alluvium are unlikely to recover any scientifically significant vertebrae remains. In addition, the potential for paleontological resources on the Project site is considered low because the site contains Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits (which have low paleontological sensitivity from the surface to a depth of 15 ft and high sensitivity below that mark). Ground-disturbing activities on the site are not anticipated to extend deeper than 9 ft. Therefore, it is unlikely that construction activities would result in impacts to paleontological resources. However, in the unlikely event that fossil remains are encountered on the site, a paleontologist shall be contacted to assess the discovery for scientific significance and make recommendations regarding the necessity to develop paleontological mitigation (including paleontological monitoring, collection, stabilization, and identification of observed resources; curation of resources into a museum repository; and preparation of a monitoring report of findings) as required by Mitigation Measure GEO-2. With implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-2, impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. At the completion of Project construction, the proposed Project would not result in further disturbance of native soils on the Project site. Therefore, operation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a paleontological resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-49 Page 343 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Mitigation Measure: GEO-2 Unknown Paleontological Resources. In the event that paleontological resources are encountered during Project excavation activities, work in the immediate area of the find shall be redirected and a paleontologist shall be contacted to assess the find for significance and make recommendations regarding further paleontological mitigation as needed. If Project plans change to include excavation below a depth of 15 feet (ft), a paleontologist shall be hired to develop a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for this Project. The PRIMP shall include the methods that will be used to protect paleontological resources that may exist within the Project site, as well as procedures for monitoring, fossil preparation and identification, curation into a repository, and preparation of a final report at the conclusion of grading. Excavation and grading activities in deposits with high paleontological sensitivity (Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, Unit 1 below a depth of 15 ft) shall be monitored by a paleontological monitor following a PRIMP. No monitoring is required for excavation in deposits with low paleontological sensitivity (Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, Unit 1 from the surface to a depth of 15 ft). Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. 4-50 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1YU INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan,policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse ❑ ❑ ® ❑ gases? Discussion The analysis in this section is based on the findings of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (LSA, March 2018). The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis is included in this IS/MND as Appendix A. Technical Background Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are present in the atmosphere naturally, released by natural sources, or formed from secondary reactions taking place in the atmosphere. The gases that are widely seen as the principal contributors to human-induced global climate change are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), 03, and water vapor. Over the last 200 years, humans have caused substantial quantities of GHGs to be released into the atmosphere. These extra emissions are increasing GHG concentrations in the atmosphere and enhancing the natural greenhouse effect, which is causing global warming. While manmade GHGs include naturally occurring GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N20, some gases, like hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6),are completely new to the atmosphere. For the purposes of planning and regulation, CCR Section 15364.5 defines GHGs to include, but not be limited to, CO2, CH4, N20, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6. Fossil fuel consumption in the transportation sector (e.g., on-road motor vehicles, off-highway mobile sources, and aircraft) is the single largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately half of GHG emissions globally. Industrial and commercial sources are the second largest contributors of GHG emissions, making up about one-fourth of total emissions. The State CEQA Guidelines encourage Lead Agencies to consider many factors in conducting a CEQA analysis but preserve the discretion granted by CEQA to Lead Agencies in making their determinations. Section 15064.4 of the State CEQA Guidelines specifies how Lead Agencies may develop and employ thresholds of significance for GHG emissions. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4 states: (b) The determination of the significance of greenhouse gas emissions calls for a careful judgment by the lead agency consistent with the provisions in section 15064. A lead agency should make a good-faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 34 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 factual data,to describe, calculate, or estimate the amount of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project. A lead agency shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to: (1) Use a model or methodology to quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project, and which model or methodology to use. The lead agency has discretion to select the model or methodology it considers most appropriate provided it supports its decision with substantial evidence.The lead agency should explain the limitations of the particular model or methodology selected for use; and/or (2) Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance based standards. (c) A lead agency should consider the following factors, among others, when assessing the significance of impacts from greenhouse gas emissions on the environment: (1) The extent to which the project may increase or reduce greenhouse gas emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting. (2) Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project. (3) The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. Such requirements must be adopted by the relevant public agency through a public review process and must reduce or mitigate the project's incremental contribution of greenhouse gas emissions. If there is substantial evidence that the possible effects of a particular project are still cumulatively considerable notwithstanding compliance with the adopted regulations or requirements, an EIR must be prepared for the project. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b) provides that "the determination of whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment calls for careful judgment on the part of the public agency involved, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data," and further states that an "ironclad definition of significant effect is not always possible because the significance of an activity may vary with the setting." The State CEQA Guidelines also clarify that the effects of GHG emissions are cumulative and should be analyzed in the context of the State CEQA Guidelines requirements for cumulative impact analysis. As such, currently neither the CEQA statutes, the OPR guidelines, nor the State CEQA Guidelines prescribe specific quantitative thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. As with most environmental topics, significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted an Interim Quantitative GHG Significance Threshold where SCAQMD is the Lead Agency (e.g., stationary-source permit projects, 4-52 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1�/ 0� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J rules, and plans) of 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MT CO2e) per year for industrial projects and 3,000 MT CO2e per year for commercial/residential projects. For the purpose of this analysis, the concept of carbon dioxide equivalence (CO2e) is used to describe how much global warming a given type and amount of GHG may cause, using the functionally equivalent amount or concentration of CO2 as the reference. Individual GHGs have varying global warming potentials and atmospheric lifetimes. CO2e is a consistent methodology for comparing GHG emissions because it normalizes various GHGs to the same metric. The GHG emissions estimates were calculated using CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2). CaIEEMod is an air quality modeling program that estimates air pollution emissions in pounds per day or tons per year for various land uses, area sources, construction projects, and Project operations. Impact Analysis a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Construction Emissions. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would produce combustion emissions from various sources. During construction, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and builder supply vendor vehicles, each of which typically use fossil-based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N20. Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Exhaust emissions from on-site construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels change. As indicated above, the SCAQMD does not have an adopted threshold of significance for construction-related GHG emissions. However, Lead Agencies are required to quantify and disclose GHG emissions that would occur during construction. The SCAQMD requires the construction GHG emissions to be amortized over the life of the project (defined as 30 years), added to the operational emissions, and compared to the applicable interim GHG significance threshold tier. Using CaIEEMod, it is estimated that the proposed Project would generate approximately 552 MT CO2e during construction of the Project. When annualized over the 30-year life of the Project, annual emissions would be 18 MT CO2e. The estimated construction emissions would be well below the SCAQMD's threshold criteria of 3,000 MT CO2e per year. Therefore, Project construction would be considered to have a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions and would not, directly or indirectly, have a significant impact on the environment. No mitigation is required. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Project would be required to implement construction exhaust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 for other air quality topics discussed in Section 4.3 of this IS/MND, including minimization of construction equipment idling and implementation of proper engine tuning and exhaust controls. Both of these measures would reduce GHG emissions during the construction period. Operational Emissions. Long-term operation of the proposed Project would generate GHG emissions from area and mobile sources and indirect emissions from stationary sources associated PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 3474-53 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 with energy consumption. Mobile-source emissions of GHGs would result from Project-generated vehicle trips. Area-source emissions would be associated with activities such as landscaping and maintenance of the proposed Project, natural gas for heating, and other sources. Increases in stationary-source emissions would also occur at off-site utility providers as a result of demand for electricity, natural gas, and water by the proposed Project. Table 4.8.A shows the calculated GHG emissions for the proposed Project. Table 4.8.A: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions(MT/yr) Bio-CO2 NBio-CO, Total COZ CH4 N20 COZe Construction emissions amortized over 30 years 0 29 29 <1 0 29 Operational Emissions Area Sources 0 34 34 <1 <1 34 Energy Sources 0 172 172 <1 <1 173 Mobile Sources 0 996 996 <1 0 997 Waste Sources 13 0 13 <1 0 32 Water Usage 1 28 30 <1 <1 34 Total Project Emissions 1 14 1,259 1,273 1 <1 I 1,299 SCAQMD Threshold for Mixed-Use Projects 3,000 Significant? No Source:Compiled by LSA(February 2018). Note:Numbers in table may not appear to add up correctly due to rounding of all numbers. Bio-CO2=biologically generated carbon dioxide MT/yr=metric tons per year CH4=methane N20=nitrous oxide CO2=carbon dioxide NBio-CO2=Nonbiologically generated carbon dioxide CO2e=carbon dioxide equivalent SCAQMD=South Coast Air Quality Management District As discussed above, according to SCAQMD, a project would have less than significant GHG emissions if it would result in operation-related GHG emissions of less than 3,000 MT CO2e per year. Based on the analysis results, the proposed Project would result in approximately 1,299 MT CO2e per year, which would be well below the SCAQMD's numeric threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e per year.Therefore, the proposed Project would not generate significant GHG emissions that would have a significant effect on the environment and would have a less than significant impact related to GHG emissions. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? The City currently does not have an adopted climate action plan to reduce GHG emissions within its jurisdictional boundaries. Absent an adopted climate action plan, the City's General Plan goals and policies related to climate change were used to respond to this threshold. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its updated General Plan and certified the Final Program EIR on May 19, 2010. The following General Plan policies would apply to this analysis: 4-54 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study—Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage 1�/ QZ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J GP Policy PS-10.1—Pursue efforts to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions by implementing effective energy conservation and efficiency measures and promoting the use of renewable energy (e.g., solar, wind, biomass, cogeneration, and hydroelectric power). Implementation Action(s)—Adopt a formal green building program or create one based on a national model, such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), GreenPoint Rated, and/or other programs into the City's codes. GP Policy PS-11.3—Support programs that increase ridesharing, reduce pollutants generated by vehicle use, and meet the transportation control measures recommended by SCAQMD in the most recent Clean Air Plan. Implementation Action(s)—Coordinate with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce to provide educational materials and incentives for businesses that engage in carpooling, transit, and flexible work schedules, etc., to reduce the use of individual vehicles. GP Policy PS-11.4—Support regional and local transportation and housing programs that reduce vehicle emissions by decreasing vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Implementation Action(s)—Continue to require development proposal compliance with the City's adopted Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Sustainable Community Action Plan on April 5, 2017. This plan is focused on citywide measures to advance environmental sustainability and reduce GHG emissions. However, only the following policies would apply to this analysis: LU 1.1—Support new, diverse housing opportunities within walking distance of businesses, employment, and mixed-use areas. LU 1.2—Support building multifamily and mixed-use development in areas identified by the General Plan. The proposed Project would comply with these applicable Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Sustainable Community Action Plan policies. However, none of these policies includes provisions for determining the effect of compliance, so this analysis does not attempt to determine the reduction in GHG emissions that would result from compliance with these plans. However, as shown in Table 4.8.A, even without including the GHG emissions reductions that would result from compliance with these plans, the proposed Project-related GHG emissions would be well below the SCAQMD threshold. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. This impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-55 Page 349 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous ❑ ❑ ® ❑ materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions ❑ ❑ ® ❑ involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter ❑ ❑ ® ❑ mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety ❑ ❑ ® ❑ hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted ❑ ® ❑ ❑ emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a ❑ ❑ ❑ significant risk of loss,injury or death involving wildland fires? Discussion: The following section is based on the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Rancho- Etiwanda Development, Northwest of the Intersection of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (Phase I ESA) (Leighton and Associates, Inc., August 2016).This report is included in Appendix G. Impact Analysis a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Hazardous materials are chemicals that could potentially cause harm during an accidental release or mishap, and are defined as being toxic, corrosive, flammable, reactive, and irritant, or strong sensitizer.31 Hazardous substances include all chemicals regulated under the United States 31 A "sensitizer" is a chemical that can cause a substantial proportion of people or animals to develop an allergic reaction in normal tissue after repeated exposure to a chemical (United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2017 Website: https://www.osha.gov/laws- regs/regulations/standardnumber/1917/1917.28AppA(accessed,June 14, 2019). 4-56 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Department of Transportation's "hazardous materials" regulations and the EPA's "hazardous waste" regulations. Hazardous wastes require special handling and disposal because of their potential to damage public health and the environment. The probable frequency and severity of consequences from the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials is affected by the type of substance,the quantity used or managed, and the nature of the activities and operations. Construction. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would use a limited amount of hazardous and flammable substances (e.g., oils) during heavy equipment operation for site grading and construction. The amount of hazardous chemicals present during construction is limited and would be in compliance with existing government regulations. The potential for the release of hazardous materials during Project construction is low, and even if a release would occur, it would not result in a significant hazard to the public, surrounding land uses, or environment due to the small quantities of these materials associated with construction vehicles. Therefore, no mitigation is required. Operation. The proposed Project includes the development of a gated residential community with 131 for-rent residential units (73 one-bedroom and 58 two-bedroom units), 4 commercial-ready units, and a commercial space. Residential and small-scale commercial uses, as proposed as part of the Project, typically do not present a hazard associated with the accidental release of hazardous substances into the environment because residents and small-scale businesses are not anticipated to use, store, dispose, or transport large volumes of hazardous materials. Hazardous substances associated with residential uses are typically limited in both amount and use such that they can be contained without impacting the environment. No manufacturing, industrial, or other uses utilizing large amounts of hazardous materials would occur within the Project site. As a mixed-use development, long-term operational activities typical of the proposed residential and commercial uses involve the use and storage of small quantities of potentially hazardous materials in the form of cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and pesticides. For example, maintenance activities related to landscaping include the use of fertilizers and light equipment (e.g., lawn mowers and edgers) that may require fuel. As stated previously, these types of activities do not involve the use of a large or substantial amount of hazardous materials. In addition, such materials would be contained, stored, and used in accordance with manufacturers' instructions and handled in compliance with applicable standards and regulations. Any associated risk would be adequately reduced to a less than significant level through compliance with these standards and regulations. In addition, because the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) is the regulatory authority for the handling of hazardous waste and hazardous materials, all businesses utilizing the commercial space within the proposed Project that would handle hazardous materials are required to prepare hazardous materials release response plans and hazardous materials inventory statements. These release response plans and inventory statements are submitted upon request to the RCFPD.32 With adherence to RCFPD standards, impacts associated with the disposal of hazardous materials and/or the potential release of hazardous materials that could occur with the implementation of the proposed Project are considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required. 32 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,Section 17.66.040, Hazardous Materials. 2020. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-57 Page 351 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Therefore, potential impacts from the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials resulting from operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? A Phase I ESA (Appendix G) was prepared for APN 1053-091-010-000, which includes the entire Project site.The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to evaluate the Project site for potential Recognized Environmental Concerns (RECs), Historical Recognized Environmental Concerns (HRECs), or Controlled Recognized Environmental Concerns (CRECs) that may be present and/or off-site conditions that impact the Project site. The Phase I ESA prepared for the proposed Project included: (1) a reconnaissance-level visit of the subject site for evidence of the release of hazardous materials and petroleum products; (2) a records review of previous reports, including governmental databases and a historical review; and (3) interviews. The Phase I ESA also assessed whether a vapor encroachment condition (VEC) exists at the subject property, which evaluates whether hazardous materials or other adverse environmental conditions are present due to past or present use of the subject property and/or properties in the vicinity. An REC can be defined as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in or at a property due to a release to the environment, under conditions indicative of a release to the environment, or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. An HREC can be defined as a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. A CREC can be defined as a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. According to the Phase I ESA, no RECs, HRECs, or CRECs were identified that would negatively impact the Project site. During the site reconnaissance survey, evidence of domestic debris/dumped materials such as clothes,furniture, toys, trash, used tires, and electronic waste was observed in the central and southern portions of the subject site. Evidence of minimal dumped construction debris, such as broken concrete and wood, was observed in the western and southern areas of the subject site. Soil stockpiles observed in the central and eastern portions of the subject site appear to be of local origin derived from construction activities from nearby residential housing developments. However, as previously discussed, no RECs were observed on the property. Furthermore, a review of 4-58 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1yd� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J applicable regulatory databases and the Vapor Encroachment Screen (VES) application did not identify any on-site listings for the subject site. Listings found near the Project site indicated no known releases of hazardous chemicals of concern in sufficient quantities to warrant enforcement action by a regulatory agency. Moreover, no potential RECs were identified as having been historically or currently present on the property during the interviews conducted as part of the Phase I ESA. Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA, no further environmental investigation is recommended. Therefore, the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The proposed residential Project would not produce hazardous emissions or handle acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes. The nearest school to the Project site is Perdew Elementary School, located at 13051 Miller Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga (approximately 0.3 mi northwest of the Project site). As noted in Response 4.9(a), the proposed Project is not anticipated to release hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes in significant quantities. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would use a limited amount of hazardous and flammable substances/oils during heavy equipment operation for site excavation, grading, and construction. The amount of hazardous chemicals present during construction is limited and would be in compliance with existing government regulations. Residences and businesses would not require the use, storage, disposal, or transport of large volumes of hazardous materials that could cause serious environmental damage in the event of an accident. Although hazardous substances would be present and utilized at these residences and businesses, such substances are generally present now in the existing environment, are typically found in small quantities, and can be cleaned up without affecting the environment. Further, there are no schools within 0.25 mi of the Project site. Therefore, impacts related to hazardous emissions or the handing of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or wastes within 0.25 mi of an existing or proposed school would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? A Phase I ESA was prepared for the proposed Project. According to the Phase I ESA, the Project site is not included on any hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. No mitigation is required. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> A7-qq Page 353 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. e) Would the project be located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a participant in the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (2011). The northern runway of LA/Ontario International Airport is located approximately 1 mi from Rancho Cucamonga's southern boundary.33 The Project site is approximately 5.3 mi from LA/Ontario International Airport. Although Rancho Cucamonga is within the Airport's Influence Area (AIA),34 according to Exhibit 2A of the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, the Safety and Noise policies included in the plan do not apply to the City.3S No aircraft safety zones affect Rancho Cucamonga'6 because departing planes primarily fly over Ontario and Montclair, and arriving planes primarily fly over Fontana and Ontario. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration has not identified any Height Notification Areas or Obstruction Surfaces within the Project vicinity.37 For these reasons, the proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working the Project area. There would be a less than significant impact, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Construction. During short-term construction activities, the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in any substantial traffic queuing along East Avenue or West Foothill Boulevard and all construction equipment would be staged on site. All large construction vehicles entering and exiting the site would be guided by the use of personnel using signs and flags to direct traffic. The Project does not include any characteristics (e.g., permanent road closure or long-term blocking of road access) that would physically impair or otherwise interfere with emergency response or evacuation in the Project vicinity. However, the proposed Project would require temporary lane closures on East Avenue for utility connections and construction of the sidewalk adjacent to the Project site. Temporary lane closures would be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual. Among other things, the manual recommends 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010. General Plan. Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety. 34 City of Ontario. 2011. LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. 35 Ibid. 36 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010. General Plan. Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety. 37 Ibid. 4-60 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study—Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. g 66/ caN l INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J early coordination with affected agencies to ensure that emergency vehicle access is maintained. In this manner, officials could plan and respond appropriately to direct the public away from Lewis Street in the event of an emergency requiring evacuation. In addition, as described in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, the Project Applicant/Developer would be required to prepare and implement a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan, which would be subject to the approval of the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works, or designee. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan would require certain conditions (e.g., providing warning signs, lights, and devices) and would require that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or roadway work. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, potential impacts to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed Project would be reduced to a less than significant level. Operation. Two emergency plans govern emergency response and evacuation in Rancho Cucamonga. The San Bernardino County Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) describes who is responsible for specific emergency response actions before, during, and immediately after an emergency. The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) establishes long-term strategies to reduce losses resulting from a disaster and identifies capital improvement projects to mitigate potential damage before a disaster occurs.38 According to the LHMP, earthquakes, wildland fire, and failure of the San Antonio Dam have the potential to impair adopted emergency response and evacuation plans, as well as restrict access to local acute care hospitals.39 Although there are no officially designated evacuation routes in Rancho Cucamonga, regional access to and from the Project site is largely dependent on 1-15 and West Foothill Boulevard. The proposed Project does not include any changes to public or private roadways that would physically impair or otherwise conflict with any emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Further, the proposed Project would not obstruct or alter any transportation routes that could be used as evacuation routes during emergency events. During short-term construction activities, the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in any substantial traffic queuing along East Avenue or West Foothill Boulevard and all construction equipment would be staged on site. During the operational phase of the proposed Project, on-site access would be required to comply with standards established by the City and the RCFPD. The size and location of fire suppression facilities (e.g., hydrants) and fire access routes on the Project site would be required to conform to City and RCFPD standards. The proposed Project would provide adequate emergency access to the site via a driveway and easement off of East Avenue; the driveway and easement would connect to an internal accessway that would ensure access for emergency vehicles within the interior of the site. Conversely, the easement would connect the Project site to East Avenue, which connects to West Foothill Boulevard. As established above, Foothill Boulevard is a principal corridor providing access to the greater region in the event of an emergency. 38 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Ready RC. Before, During and After an Emergency in Rancho Cucamonga. 2015. 39 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. 2013. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 35 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 As previously stated, the Project would be developed in accordance with City emergency access standards. Access to and from the Project site for emergency vehicles would be reviewed and approved by the RCFPD and the City as part of the project approval process to ensure the proposed Project is compliant with all applicable codes and ordinances for emergency vehicle access. Operational Project impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. Impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed Project would be reduced to a less than significant level with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: HAZ-1 Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall be prepared for approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Department, or designee. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall also include the name and phone number of a contact person who can be reached 24 hours per day regarding construction traffic complaints or emergency situations. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan may include, but not be limited to,the following: • Temporary lane closures shall be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual. • Flagpersons in adequate numbers shall be provided to minimize impacts to traffic flow and to ensure safe access into and out of the site. • Flagpersons shall be trained to assist in emergency response by restricting or controlling the movement of traffic that could interfere with emergency vehicle access. • All emergency access to the Project site and adjacent areas shall be kept clear and unobstructed during all phases of demolition and construction. • Safety precautions shall be provided for pedestrians and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers. • Construction-related deliveries other than concrete and earthwork-related deliveries shall be scheduled so as to reduce travel during peak travel periods (i.e., 6:00 a.m.to 9:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday). • The construction contractor shall coordinate with other construction projects in the vicinity to minimize conflicts. 4-62 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1f& INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J • If necessary, a California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)transportation permit shall be obtained for use of oversized transport vehicles on Caltrans facilities. • If necessary, a traffic management plan shall be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. • Construction vehicles, including construction personnel vehicles, shall not park on public streets, including streets outside Rancho Cucamonga. • Construction vehicles shall not stage or queue where they interfere with pedestrian and vehicular traffic or block access to nearby businesses. • If feasible, any traffic lane closures shall be limited to off-peak traffic periods, as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works. • The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or other roadway work. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly,to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? In its existing setting, the Project site is vacant and undeveloped. However,the Project site is located within an urban area of Rancho Cucamonga and is bounded by East Avenue to the east, single-family residential housing to the north, Garcia Park to the northwest, and open space/vacant land to the west and south, with residential uses bordering these vacant areas. The Project site is not within or near a Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area40 or any Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ).41 As a result, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 40 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. 41 CAL FIRE.2012. FHSZ Viewer.Website: https:Hegis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/(accessed June 22,2019). PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 3574-63 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ groundwater quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the ❑ ❑ ❑ project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces,in a manner which would: i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site; ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ offsite; iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage ❑ ❑ ® ❑ systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;or iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of ❑ ❑ ® ❑ pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality ❑ ❑ ® ❑ control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Discussion The discussion and analysis provided in this section are based on the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) prepared by Madole and Associates, Inc. (Appendix H of this IS/MND). Impact Analysis a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? Construction. The proposed Project involves the construction of a two- and three-story mixed-use development for residential and commercial purposes on the Project site. Pollutants of concern during construction include sediments, trash, petroleum products, concrete waste (dry and wet), sanitary waste, and chemicals. Each of these pollutants on its own or in combination with other pollutants can have a detrimental effect on water quality. During construction activities, excavated soil would be exposed, and there would be an increased potential for soil erosion and sedimentation compared to existing conditions. In addition, chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products (e.g., paints, solvents, and fuels), and concrete-related waste may be spilled or leaked and have the 4-64 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage 1�/. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J potential to be transported via stormwater runoff into receiving waters (i.e., the Santa Ana River and ultimately the Pacific Ocean). During construction, the disturbed soil area would be approximately 5.74 ac. Because construction of the proposed Project would disturb greater than 1 ac of soil, the Project is subject to the requirements of the SWRCB's NPDES permit Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009- DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, as amended by Orders No. 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ) (Construction General Permit). The Construction General Permit requires preparation of a SWPPP and implementation of construction BMPs during construction activities. Construction BMPs would include, but not be limited to, Erosion Control and Sediment Control BMPs designed to minimize erosion and retain sediment on site and Good Housekeeping BMPs to prevent spills, leaks, and discharge of construction debris and waste into receiving waters. As specified in RCM-WQ-1, the Project would obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit. In compliance with the Construction General Permit, a SWPPP would be prepared for the Project and construction BMPs implemented to target pollutants of concern. Implementation of RCM-WQ-1 would ensure construction impacts related to WDRs, water quality standards, and surface water quality would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. According to the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the Project, groundwater was not encountered during exploratory borings at depths of 51.5 ft bgs. Groundwater depths on site were reported by the Chino Basin Watermaster at depths of 500 ft bgs during fall 2006 and spring 2012. Additionally, groundwater measurements were taken at a nearby well from March 2011 through May 2016, which indicated the highest level of groundwater was approximately 575 ft bgs. Therefore, based on these recorded depths of groundwater, excavation activities would not have the potential to encounter groundwater and groundwater dewatering would not be required during construction. Infiltration of stormwater can have the potential to affect groundwater quality in areas of shallow groundwater. As discussed above, groundwater could occur at depths in the range of 500 ft bgs. Pollutants in stormwater are generally removed by soil through absorption as water infiltrates. Therefore, in areas of deep groundwater, there is more absorption potential and, as a result, less potential for pollutants to reach groundwater. Therefore, due to the depth to groundwater, it is not expected that any stormwater that may infiltrate during construction would affect groundwater quality because there is not a direct path for pollutants to reach groundwater. Therefore, Project construction would not substantially degrade groundwater quality. Operation. Based on the proposed mixed-use (attached residential and commercial) on the Project site, expected pollutants of concern from long-term operations include pathogens (bacteria/viruses), metals, nutrients/noxious aquatic plants, organic compounds, pesticides/ herbicides, sediments/total suspended solids/pH, trash and debris, oxygen-demanding compounds, and oil and grease. The Project would comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB's NPDES Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino, and the Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region (Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County MS4 permit). Section 19.20.260 of the City's Municipal Code and the San Bernardino County MS4 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-65 Page 359 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 permit require that a WQMP be prepared for new development projects. WQMPs specify the Site Design/LID, Source Control, and/or Treatment Control BMPs that would be implemented to capture, treat, and reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. A PWQMP (Madole and Associates, Inc., June 2019) has been prepared for the Project. As specified in RCM-WQ-2, the PWQMP will be refined during final design based on the final site plan. According to the PWQMP, proposed BMPs include a storm drain stencil to discourage downstream dumping, a catch basin filter to remove the majority of trash and debris prior to reaching underground storm drains, a settling chamber to filter pollutants, and an injection well to drain and infiltrate water runoff. Stormwater runoff from the Project site would be captured and conveyed by on-site catch basins and storm drains throughout the site and conveyed to an injection well at the southwest corner of the site. Stormwater runoff would be treated initially within the pre-treatment chamber, where trash, debris, and sediments would settle at the bottom. A floating sponge would further remove pollutants, and intake screens would then filter the stormwater before it enters the connection pipe adjacent to the injection well. The injection well would collect and filter runoff through a vertical gravel pit. Prior to leaving the Project site, the injection well would collect the first flush (i.e. initial surface runoff) during a storm event, and a diversion manhole would intercept low- flow stormwater runoff. Stormwater runoff that exceeds the first flush would be conveyed to the proposed storm drain system in East Avenue, which would connect to the existing storm drain system in East Avenue. As specified in RCM-WQ-2, the Project would comply with the City Municipal Code and San Bernardino County MS4 Permit requirements, including incorporation of post- construction BMPs to target pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. Compliance with these requirements would reduce operational impacts related to WDRs, water quality standards, degradation of water quality, and beneficial uses to a less than significant level, and no mitigation would be required. As discussed previously, infiltration of stormwater could have the potential to affect groundwater quality in areas of shallow groundwater. Due to the depth to groundwater, it is not expected that any stormwater that may infiltrate during construction would affect groundwater quality because there is not a direct path for pollutants to reach groundwater. In addition, the Project would be required to implement LID features to treat stormwater before it could reach groundwater. Therefore, Project operation would not substantially degrade groundwater quality. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. However, the following Regulatory Compliance Measures are standard conditions based on local, State, and federal regulations or laws that serve to reduce impacts related to hydrology and water quality. These Regulatory Compliance Measures are applicable to the proposed Project and shall be incorporated to ensure that the Project has minimal impacts to receiving waters. RCM-WQ-1 Construction General Permit. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall obtain coverage under the State Water Resources Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009- DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System No. CAS000002, as amended 4-66 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1Y6QZ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J by Orders No. 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ) (Construction General Permit). This shall include submission of Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), including a Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under the permit to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) via the Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). The Applicant shall provide the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) to demonstrate proof of coverage under the Construction General Permit. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared and implemented for the proposed Project in compliance with the requirements of the Construction General Permit. The SWPPP shall identify construction best management practices (BMPs) to be implemented to ensure that the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation is minimized and to control the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff as a result of construction activities. Upon completion of construction and stabilization of the site, a Notice of Termination will be submitted via SMARTS. RCM-WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits,the Applicant shall submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City Engineer, or designee, for review and approval in compliance with the requirements of Section 19.20.260 of the City's Municipal Code and the Waste Discharge Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, the County of San Bernardino, and the Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region (Order No. R8-2010-0036, NPDES No. CAS618036) (San Bernardino County MS4 Permit). The Final WQMP shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of the Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans (June 2013) and the Water Quality Management Plan template, or subsequent guidance manuals. The Final WQMP shall specify the BMPs to be incorporated into the Project design to target pollutants of concern in runoff from the Project area. The City shall ensure that the BMPs specified in the Final WQMP are incorporated into the final Project design. b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Construction. According to the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the Project, groundwater has historically been encountered at deep depths of approximately 500 ft bgs. Because of the depth to groundwater, excavation activities would not be anticipated to encounter groundwater during construction. Therefore, groundwater dewatering would not be required. Furthermore, groundwater extraction would not be required during Project construction. Therefore, construction impacts related to depletion of groundwater supplies or interference with groundwater recharge would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Operation. Currently, the Project site is undeveloped and consists of only pervious surfaces. According to the PWQMP, development of the Project would increase impervious surface area on the Project site by approximately 5 ac. The increase in impervious surface area as a result of Project implementation would decrease on-site infiltration. However, due to the depth of groundwater, it is PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-67 Page 361 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 unlikely that groundwater recharge from stormwater infiltration currently occurs on the Project site. In addition, the Project site is within the Chino Subbasin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, which is managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster.42 Any decrease in infiltration would be minimal in comparison to the size of the Chino Subbasin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, which has an unused storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet.43 The Project would also include BMPs to increase infiltration of stormwater runoff on the Project site. Furthermore, Project operation would not include groundwater extraction. For these reasons, no impacts related to depletion of groundwater supplies or interference with groundwater recharge would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i Result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? Construction. During construction activities, soil would be exposed and disturbed, drainage patterns would be temporarily altered during grading and other construction activities, and there would be an increased potential for soil erosion and siltation compared to existing conditions. Additionally, during a storm event, soil erosion and siltation could occur at an accelerated rate. As discussed above in Response 4.10(a), the Construction General Permit requires preparation of a SWPPP to identify construction BMPs to be implemented as part of the proposed Project to reduce impacts to water quality during construction, including those impacts associated with soil erosion and siltation. With compliance with the requirements in the Construction General Permit and implementation of the construction BMPs as indicated in RCM-WQ-1, construction impacts related to on- or off-site erosion or siltation would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Operation. Currently, the Project site is undeveloped and consists of only pervious surfaces. Development of the Project would increase impervious surface area on the Project site to a total of approximately 5 ac, which would increase stormwater runoff. However, impervious surface areas associated with development of the Project site are not prone to erosion or siltation. Erosion and siltation would be minimal in the proposed landscaped areas. In the undeveloped areas, erosion and siltation would be similar to the existing condition. Therefore, impacts related to on-site erosion or siltation would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. The proposed on-site storm drain facilities would connect to an existing off-site storm drain system located south of the Project site in East Avenue. Although stormwater runoff would eventually be discharged to receiving waters via the existing storm drain system, there is minimal potential for 42 Chino Basin Watermaster. 2019a.Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. 43 Chino Basin Watermaster. 2019b. Overview. Website: http://www.cbwm.org/overview.htm (accessed June 11, 2019). 4-68 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1YO INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J downstream erosion or siltation to occur because the receiving waters are not subject to hydromodification44 and the Project would therefore not contribute to a hydrologic condition of concern (HCOC).45 According to the Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans, the Project site is located in an area meeting the HCOC exemption criteria because all downstream conveyance channels flow to an adequate sum and drain to storage areas that are controlled release points used for water conservation where the receiving waters are subject to hydromodification impacts.46 The Project site is in an area exempt from HCOC, as Project operations would not substantially increase runoff flow or volume compared to existing conditions. Therefore, a less than significant impact related to off-site erosion or siltation would occur, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: ii Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would: result in flooding on-or offsite? Currently, the Project site is undeveloped and consists of only pervious surfaces. As stated in Response 4.10(c)(i), above, development of the proposed Project would increase impervious surface area by approximately 5 ac, which would increase stormwater runoff and could potentially result in flooding. However, the proposed on-site storm drain facilities and LID BMPs (a catch basin filter, a settling chamber, and an injection well) would capture and infiltrate stormwater runoff. In addition, as specified in Regulatory Compliance Measure RCM-WQ-3, a Final Hydrology Study would be prepared based on final Project plans and would be approved by the City. The Hydrology Study would confirm that sufficient capacity in the downstream drain systems is available to accommodate any increase in storm runoff from the Project site. The proposed drainage facilities and BMPs needed to accommodate stormwater runoff would also be appropriately sized so that on-site flooding would not occur. Finally, the proposed Project would not alter the course of a stream or river. With implementation of LID BMPs and RCM-WQ-3, impacts related to on- or off-site flooding from an increase in surface runoff would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. 44 Hydromodification is defined as hydrologic changes resulting from increased runoff from increases in impervious surfaces. Hydromodification impacts can included changes in downstream erosion and sedimentation. 45 Areas designated as hydrologic conditions of concern are watersheds of unarmored or soft-armored drainages that are vulnerable to geomorphology changes due to hydromodification. 46 County of San Bernardino. 2013. Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. Appendix F: HCOC Exemption Criteria and Map. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-69 Page 363 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. However, the following Regulatory Compliance Measure would be implemented to reduce impacts. RCM-WQ-3: Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis. The Applicant shall submit a Final Hydrology Study to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Director of Engineering, or his/her designee, for review and approval prior to issuance of grading and building permits. The Final Hydrology Study shall demonstrate that the on-site drainage facilities are designed and adequately sized to convey and reduce runoff, such that on-site and off-site drainage facility capacity would not be exceeded during a design storm. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: iii Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? As discussed in Response 4.10(a), pollutants of concern during construction include sediments, trash, petroleum products, concrete waste (dry and wet), sanitary waste, and chemicals. Each of these pollutants on its own or in combination with other pollutants can have a detrimental effect on water quality. Drainage patterns would be temporarily altered during grading and other construction activities, and construction-related pollutants could be spilled, leaked, or transported via storm runoff into adjacent drainages and downstream receiving waters. However, as specified in RCM-WQ-1, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the requirements set forth by the Construction General Permit and SWPPP, which would specify BMPs to be implemented to control the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff as a result of construction activities. Operation of the proposed Project has the potential to introduce pollutants to the storm drain system from the proposed on-site uses. As discussed in Response 4.10(a), expected pollutants of concern from long-term operations include pathogens (bacteria/viruses), metals, nutrients/noxious aquatic plants, organic compounds, pesticides/herbicides, sediments/total suspended solids/pH, trash and debris, oxygen-demanding compounds, and oil and grease. As required by RCM-WQ-2, the Final WQMP would require implementation of operational BMPs to reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. With implementation of operational BMPs, no substantial additional sources of polluted runoff would be discharged to the storm drain system. Development of the proposed Project would increase impervious surface area on the Project site to a total of approximately 5 ac, which would increase stormwater runoff generated during Project operation. The proposed on-site storm drain would run south and connect to the existing storm drain system in East Avenue. As specified in RCM-WQ-3, the Final Hydrology Study shall demonstrate that the on-site drainage facilities are designed and adequately sized to convey and reduce runoff, such that on-site and off-site drainage facility capacity would not be exceeded during 4-70 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1YU INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J a design storm. With implementation of RCM-WQ-3, the proposed Project would not result in an exceedance of planned or existing stormwater drainage systems. For the reasons discussed above, with adherence to measures RCM-WQ-1, RCM-WQ-2, and RCM- WQ-3, Project impacts associated with the introduction of substantial sources of polluted runoff or additional runoff would be less than significant and would not result in an exceedance in capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required; however, RCM-WQ-1 and RCM-WQ-2 (provided in Responses 4.10[a]) and RCM-WQ-3 (provided in Response 4.10[c][ii]) would be implemented to reduce impacts. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: iv Impede or redirect flood flows? The Project site is not located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated 100-year floodplain. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) No. 06071C8635J,47 the Project site is located within Zone X,Area with Reduced Flood Risk Due to Levee. Specifically, the Project site is not located within a direct inundation area, and is protected by a levee from flooding of the 100-year regulatory floodway associated with the Etiwanda Creek Channel, located approximately 250 ft to the east of the Project site.48 As the Project would not place improvements and structures directly within a 100-year floodplain, the Project would not impede or redirect flood flows. Therefore, no impact would occur related to impeding or redirecting of flood flows and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the Project result in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Tsunami. Tsunamis are ocean waves generated by tectonic displacement of the sea floor associated with shallow earthquakes, sea floor landslides, rock falls, and exploding volcanic islands. Tsunamis can have wavelengths of up to 120 mi and travel as fast as 500 mph across hundreds of miles of deep ocean. Upon reaching shallow coastal waters, the waves can reach up to 50 ft in height, causing great devastation to near-shore structures. The Project site is located approximately 40 mi 47 FEMA. 2014. FIRM No. 06071C8635J.September 26. 48 City of Rancho Cucamonga. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Figure PS-5. 2013. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 36 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 from the Pacific Ocean shoreline and is not located within a tsunami inundation area. Therefore, the Project site is not subject to inundation from tsunamis, and there is no risk of release of pollutants due to inundation from tsunami. Seiche Zones. Seiching occurs when seismic ground shaking induces standing waves (seiches) inside water retention facilities (e.g., reservoirs and lakes). Such waves can cause retention structures to fail and flood downstream properties. Because there are no large lakes, reservoirs, or other water retention facilities in the vicinity of the Project site, the Project site is not at risk of inundation from seiche. Therefore, the Project site is not subject to inundation from seiche waves, and there is no risk of release of pollutants due to inundation from seiche. Flood Hazard. As discussed in Response 4.10(c)(iv), the Project site is located within Zone X, Area with Reduced Flood Risk Due to Levee. Specifically, the Project site is protected from flooding of the 100-year regulatory floodway associated with the Etiwanda Creek Channel, located approximately 250 ft to the east of the Project site. However, according to the City's General Plan, the Project site is downstream of the Etiwanda Debris Basin and the San Sevaine Basin.49 Basin failure could occur as a result of flooding during storms, which could result in inundation of downstream areas. Therefore, in the unlikely event of levee failure and flooding during a storm,there would be a risk of inundation and pollutant risk on the Project site. The Project would introduce new land uses (mixed-use residential and commercial) on the Project site, which would change the potential on-site pollutants compared to existing conditions. However, as discussed in Response 4.10(a), BMPs would be implemented to target and reduce pollutants of concern on the Project site. In addition, as discussed in Section 4.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, hazardous substances associated with commercial and residential uses would be limited in both amount and use. The materials used on site would be contained, stored, and used in accordance with manufacturers' instructions and handled in compliance with applicable standards and regulations. Because BMPs would reduce introduction of pollutants on the site and any hazardous materials used on site would be properly stored and contained, there would be a low potential for pollutants to be released from the Project site in the unlikely event of levee failure and inundation of the Project site. Therefore, impacts related to release of pollutants in the event of inundation from flooding would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? The Project is within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB. The Santa Ana RWQCB adopted a Water Quality Control Plan (i.e., Basin Plan) (January 1995, with amendments effective on or before February 2016) which designates beneficial uses for all surface and groundwater within its jurisdiction and establishes the water quality objectives and standards necessary to protect those 49 City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. 2010h.Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety, Figure PS-6. 4-72 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1f& INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J beneficial uses. As summarized below, the Project would comply with the applicable NPDES permits and would implement construction and operational BMPs to reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. As discussed in Response 4.10(a), during construction activities, excavated soil would be exposed, and there would be an increased potential for soil erosion and sedimentation compared to existing conditions. In addition, chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products (e.g., paints, solvents, and fuels), and concrete-related waste may be spilled or leaked and have the potential to be transported via stormwater runoff into receiving waters. As specified in RCM-WQ-1, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the requirements set forth by the Construction General Permit, which requires preparation of a SWPPP and implementation of construction BMPs to control stormwater runoff and discharge of pollutants. As discussed in Response 4.10(a), the primary pollutants of concern during Project operations are pathogens (bacteria/viruses), metals, nutrients/noxious aquatic plants, organic compounds, pesticides/herbicides, sediments/total suspended solids/pH, trash and debris, oxygen-demanding compounds, and oil and grease. As discussed in RCM-WQ-2, a final WQMP would be prepared for the Project in compliance with the San Bernardino County MS4 Permit and the City Municipal Code. The Final WQMP will detail the Site Design/LID, Source Control, and/or Treatment Control BMPs that would be implemented to treat stormwater runoff and reduce impacts to water quality during operation. The proposed BMPs would capture and treat stormwater runoff and reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. The proposed Project would comply with the applicable NPDES permit, which requires preparation of a SWPPP, preparation of a Final WQMP, and implementation of construction and operational BMPs to reduce pollutants of concern in stormwater runoff. As such, the Project would not result in water quality impacts that would conflict with Santa Ana RWQCB's Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan). Impacts related to conflict with a water quality control plan would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) was enacted in September 2014. SGMA requires governments and water agencies of high- and medium-priority basins to halt overdraft of groundwater basins. SGMA requires the formation of local Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs), which are required to adopt Groundwater Sustainability Plans to manage the sustainability of the groundwater basins. The Project site is located within the Chino Subbasin of the Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, which is managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster.50 The Chino Basin Watermaster Board consists of nine governing members who collaborate with regional stakeholders to manage groundwater in the Chino Subbasin. The Chino Subbasin is identified by the Department of Water Resources as a very low-priority basin;" therefore, development of a 50 Chino Basin Watermaster. 2019a. "Sustainable Groundwater Management Act." Website: http://www.cbwm.org/rep_sgma.htm (accessed March 9, 2020). 51 California Department of Water Resources, SIGMA Basin Prioritization Dashboard, Groundwater Basins 2016.Website: https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bp-dashboard/p2/(accessed June 10, 2019). PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 36 74-73 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Groundwater Sustainability Plan is not required.52 Because there is not an adopted Groundwater Sustainability Plan applicable to the groundwater basin within the Project area, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of a sustainable groundwater management plan. As discussed in Thresholds 4.10 (a) and 4.10 (b),the proposed Project does not have the potential to impact groundwater quality, interfere with groundwater recharge, or decrease groundwater supplies. Therefore, no impact would occur related to conflict with or obstruction of water quality control plans or sustainable groundwater management plans, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required; however, RCM-WQ-1 and RCM-WQ-2, provided in Response 4.10(a),would be implemented to reduce impacts. 52 California Department of Water Resources. 2020. "Groundwater Sustainability Plans." Website: https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Groundwater-Management/SGMA-Groundwater-Management/ Groundwater-Sustainability-Plans(accessed March 8, 2020). 4-74 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy,or regulation adopted for the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Impact Analysis a) Would the project physically divide an established community? The Project site (APN 1053-091-010-000) consists of an 11.45 ac parcel that is partially encumbered by utility easements. The Project site is primarily surrounded by residential uses, with mixed uses present to the southeast and west, commercial uses present to the north, and vacant land (approved for a 193-unit, mixed-use development) to the south. In addition, several utility easements traverse the Project site and areas beyond in a northeast-southwest fashion. A cellular tower and a building pad associated with a CVWD pumping station are located south of the Project site, and a CVWD pumping station is located along the southern property line. The proposed Project involves the development of a two- and three-story mixed-use development consisting of 131 for-rent residential units (73 one-bedroom and 58 two-bedroom units), 4 commercial-ready units (305 sf each) that are attached to one-bedroom residential units, and a 1,592 sf commercial space. The commercial-ready units are designed to be used either as commercial space or as a second bedroom for the attached residential unit. With the exception of sidewalk improvements, curb cuts, and connections to existing utility infrastructure in surrounding roadways, all Project development would occur on the Project site. The proposed Project includes a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the Project site for condominiums. At this time, the Project is intended to be for-rent apartments, but the Tentative Tract Map would allow the Project to be converted to condominiums in the future. Implementation of the proposed Project would not change the existing parcel configuration in any area other than the Project site. The proposed Project would not divide or separate any existing land uses or neighborhoods. The neighboring residential communities are not immediately proximate to the Project site and would not be impacted by the addition of driveways (one gated driveway on East Avenue and one ungated driveway at the East Avenue/Marshall Court intersection) and the development of a residential community on currently vacant land. The construction of the proposed Project, including access improvements and the Tentative Tract Map included as part of the Project, would not result in the physical division of an established community, including the residential communities north, east, and south of the site. Therefore, PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-75 Page 369 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the physical division of any established community, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The main documents regulating land use on the Project site and immediate vicinity are the City's General Plan and Zoning Code. The proposed Project's relationship to these planning documents is described below. The existing land use designation in the General Plan is Mixed Use (MU).53 The existing zoning classification on the Project site is Community Commercial (CC); however, the site is also located within the FBOD. General Plan. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (2010) is the City's most fundamental planning document. The General Plan is comprehensive plan intended to guide the physical development of the City, and it serves as a blueprint for future growth and development. As a blueprint for the future, the plan contains policies and programs designed to provide decision-makers with a solid basis for decisions related to land use and development. The proposed Project is consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation of Mixed Use (MU). Table HE-35 in the Housing Element of the City's 2010 General Plan identifies the allowable density range of the Mixed Use (MU) designation in the city. According to the Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element, each Mixed Use designation has slightly different development parameters depending on the location within the city. The target density for all of Mixed Use (MU) designations range from 4 to 30 du/ac. Following Project implementation, the Project site would have a net density of 22.8 du/ac, which would be within the target density range for the Mixed Use (MU) designation. Table 4.11.A provides a consistency analysis of the relevant goals and policies from the City's General Plan. In order to avoid repetition and focus on key issues, goals, policies, and implementation programs that are not relevant to the proposed Project are not included in Table 4.11.A. 53 The City's General Plan Land Use Designation of the Project site has changed subsequent to the adoption of the 2010 Land Use Plan Map. Refer to General Plan Amendment DRC2015-0087. 4-76 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. ge 6/caVQZ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` Table 4.11.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis Select General Plan Policies I Consistency Analysis Managing Land Use,Community Design,and Historic Resources Element Policy LU-1:Protect neighborhoods from Consistent.The proposed Project would introduce residential and the encroachment of incompatible commercial units to a currently vacant site that is surrounded by existing activities or land uses that may have a residential and commercial developments.Therefore,the proposed negative impact on the residential living Project would not result in the encroachment of incompatible activities or environment. land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment,and the proposed Project is consistent with Policy LU-1. Policy LU-1.5:Development of densities Consistent.The proposed Project would have a net density of 22.8 du/ac, and intensities shall be implemented which would be neither higher nor lower than the limits of the allowable within the ranges specified in the General target density range of 4 du/ac and 30 du/ac for the Mixed Use(MU) Plan;neither higher nor lower than the designation.As such,the proposed Project would develop the Project site limits of the range. with a mixed-use community that is within the target density outlined in the City's General Plan.Therefore,the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU-1.5. Policy LU-2.1:Plan for vibrant,pedestrian- Consistent.The proposed Project would develop the currently vacant site friendly Mixed Use and high density with a high-density mixed-use community consisting of residential and residential areas at strategic infill commercial uses.In its existing setting,the Project site is predominantly locations along transit routes. surrounded by residential and commercial uses and is located in an urban area of Rancho Cucamonga.The Project site is also within the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard and 1-15,which are major roadways providing regional access to the Project site.In addition,the site is within walking distance (less than 0.25 mile)from an Cimnitrans bus stop,which serves Route 66 along Foothill Boulevard.As such,the proposed Project would allow for the development of a mixed-use community in a strategic infill location. Therefore,the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU-2.1. Policy LU-4.1:Provide new Mixed Use Consistent.As previously stated,the proposed Project would provide a development opportunities along the mixed-use development consisting of residential and commercial uses Foothill Boulevard Corridor to allow along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor.Therefore,the proposed Project residential,commercial,and civic uses, would be consistent with Policy LU-4.1. and to accommodate both traffic and automobiles. Policy LU-8.2:Approve only those Consistent.As established in Section 4.15,Public Services,the proposed residential densities that do not exceed Project would not exceed the capacity of the land or the ability to the capacity of the land or the ability to reasonably provide public services or adequate public safety.Fire,police, reasonably provide public services and water,wastewater,and school services would not be interrupted by the adequate public safety. proposed Project or require expansion as a result of Project implementation.In addition,the proposed Project would be developed at a density that would be within the target range for mixed-use land uses, as established in the City's General Plan.Consequently,the Project would not exceed the land capacity of the property.Therefore,the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy LU-8.2. Policy LU-8.3:Require adequate access Consistent.The proposed Project would be developed in compliance with for emergency vehicles and evacuations. RCFPD and California Fire Code standards relating to adequate access for emergency vehicles.The Project's proposed circulation system,including internal roads and driveways,has been designed to the appropriate size requirements to accommodate emergency vehicles.Moreover,as established in Section 4.9,Hazards and Hazardous Materials,and Section 4.20,Wildfire,the proposed Project would not impair an emergency response or emergency evacuation plan.Therefore,the proposed Project is consistent with Policy LU-8.3. P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20" 4-77 Page 371 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 4.11.A: General Plan Consistency Analysis Select General Plan Policies I Consistency Analysis Housing Element Objective HE-1.1:Ensure a wide range of Consistent.As discussed in Section 4.14,Population and Housing,SCAG housing alternatives and enable the City has established an RHNA goal for the City to develop 848 new housing to achieve its share of the RHNA through units for a range of income groups by the year 2021.The proposed Project the utilization of land use distribution and would introduce 131 new market-rate housing units to the City's housing development standards to encourage a supply and would help the City meet its current housing needs and the mix of housing types,including mobile RHNA goal.Therefore,the proposed Project is consistent with Objective homes and apartments,within a variety of HE-1.1. price ranges. Objective HE-2.1:Protect and expand the Consistent.As previously established,the proposed Project would range of housing opportunities available introduce 131 new market-rate units to the City's housing supply.As such, by location,price,and tenure to low-and Project implementation would expand the range of housing opportunities moderate-income households. available to moderate-income households.Therefore,the proposed Project is consistent with Objective HE-2.1. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Policy PF-2.2:Consider the needs of the Consistent.As established in Section 4.15,Public Services,the proposed school districts that serve Rancho Project would not exceed the currently available capacity at the schools Cucamonga in future planning and that would serve the Project site. Implementation of the proposed Project development activities. would not result the need for new or expanded school facilities,and the payment in Developer Impact Fees(RCM-PS-2)would offset a potential increase in costs to Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District.Therefore,the proposed Project would be consistent with Policy PF-2.2 City=City of Rancho Cucamonga du/ac=dwelling units per acre 1=Interstate RCFPD=Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District RHNA=Regional Housing Needs Assessment SCAG=Southern California Association of Governments Zoning Ordinance. The City's Zoning Ordinance is the primary implementation tool for its General Plan Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Element and the goals and policies therein. For this reason, the Zoning Map must be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map. The Land Use Map indicates the general location and extent of future land use in Rancho Cucamonga. The Zoning Ordinance, which includes the Zoning Map, contains more detailed information about permitted land uses, building intensities, and required development standards. The Project site currently has the zoning designation of Community Commercial (CC) and is within the FBOD. The proposed Project involves the development of 131 for-rent residential units, 4 commercial- ready units (305 sf each), and a 1,592 sf commercial space. The net density of the proposed Project is 22.8 du/ac, which would be inconsistent with the Community Commercial (CC) zoning classifications on the Project site. However, the Project proposes to rezone the Project site to Mixed Use (MU) District, consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. According to Table 17.26.020-1 in the City's Municipal Code, the Mixed Use (MU) District designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with site development regulations that ensure development compatible with nearby lower-density residential development, as well as internal 4-78 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J compatibility among the varying uses. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,54 the Mixed Use (MU) District allows a maximum density of 50 du/ac. Approval of the requested zone change would resolve any inconsistencies between the proposed Project and the City's Municipal Code to a less than significant level. No mitigation would be required. Parking Requirements. The proposed Project would be consistent with the City's parking requirements (refer to Section 17.64.050, Number of Parking Spaces Required, in the City's Municipal Code). The Project would require a minimum of 282 spaces, including 131 spaces that are required to be provided in the form of a garage or a carport. Required parking includes tenant and guest parking for the residential portion of the development, as well as parking for the commercial and commercial-ready units. As discussed in Section 2.6.3.2, Parking, the proposed Project would provide 134 garage parking spaces and 148 open parking spaces. Of those, 147 of the required parking spaces would be on a Southern California Gas Company easement, for which the Applicant has received an initial acceptance letter to allow parking on the easement. The Project also proposes to permit street parking on the west side of East Avenue, similar to the approved mixed-use project to the south. This would net up to 18 additional parking spaces adjacent to the commercial and commercial-ready tenant spaces. These parking spaces are not counted in the total parking count for the proposed Project, as they are not on the Project site. In summary, the proposed Project would provide 287 parking spaces, which exceeds the 282 total parking spaces required by Section 17.64.050 of the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the parking requirements outlined in the City's Municipal Code. Summary. Approval of the requested zone change would resolve any inconsistencies between the proposed Project and the City's General Plan and Municipal Code to a less than significant level. The proposed zone change would not result in any significant environmental impacts. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to conflicts with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 54 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2019. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Section 17.36.020: Development Standards for Mixed Use Zoning Districts. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-79 Page 373 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the ❑ ❑ ❑ state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ specific plan or other land use plan? Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? In 1975, the California Legislature enacted the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA), which, among other things, provided guidelines for the classification and designation of mineral lands. Areas are classified on the basis of geologic factors without regard to existing land use and land ownership. The areas are categorized into four Mineral Resource Zones (MRZs): • MRZ-1: An area where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence • MRZ-2: An area where adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that a high likelihood exists for their presence • MRZ-3:An area containing mineral deposits,the significance of which cannot be evaluated • MRZ-4: An area where available information is inadequate for assignment to any other MRZ zone Of the four categories, lands classified as MRZ-2 are of the greatest importance. Such areas are underlain by demonstrated mineral resources or are located where geologic data indicate that significant measured or indicated resources are present. MRZ-2 areas are designated by the State of California Mining and Geology Board as being "regionally significant." Such designations require that a Lead Agency's land use decisions involving designated areas are to be made in accordance with its mineral resource management policies and that it consider the importance of the mineral resource to the region or the State as a whole, not just to the Lead Agency's jurisdiction. The Project site has been classified by the California Department of Mines and Geology (CDMG) as MRZ-3, indicating that the Project site is in an area where adequate information indicates that no 4-80 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage 1�/�l INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.ss According to Figure RC-2 of the Resource Conservation Element (2010) of the City's General Plan, several areas in Rancho Cucamonga contain regionally significant aggregate resources. The closest area to the Project site is the Lytle Creek Fan, which is estimated to contain 80,200,000 tons of aggregate. However, this area has been significantly developed and has land use designations of Low- and Medium-Density Residential and Flood Control. The Project site is approximately 2 mi southwest from this resource area. Additionally, the Project site itself is not known to have any mineral resources of significance. Therefore, no significant impacts related to the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and to the residents of the State would result from Project implementation, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? As stated above, no known valuable mineral resources exist on or near the Project site. In addition, the Project site is not identified on a local General Plan, Specific Plan, or other land use plan as the location of a locally important mineral resource.Therefore, no significant impacts related to mineral resources would result from Project implementation, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. ss California Department of Conservation. 2018. Division of Mines and Geology. Mineral Land Classification Map. Special Report 143 Plate 6.1, 1984. Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mineralresources/ #datalist(Accessed March 9, 2020). PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 37 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.13 NOISE Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project ® ❑ ❑ ❑ in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use ❑ ❑ ® ❑ airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion This section is based on the East Avenue Noise Impact Analysis (Noise Impact Analysis) (Urban Crossroads,January 2017).This report is included in Appendix I. Technical Background The following provides an overview of the characteristics of sound and the regulatory framework that applies to noise within the vicinity of the Project site. Noise Fundamentals. Noise has been simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A-weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Since the range of intensities that the human ear can detect is so large, the scale frequently used to measure intensity is a scale based on multiples of 10, the logarithmic scale. The scale for measuring intensity is the decibel scale. Each interval of 10 dB indicates a sound energy 10 times greater than before, which is perceived by the human ear as being roughly twice as loud. The most common sounds vary between 40 dBA (very quiet) and 100 dBA (very loud). Normal conversation at 3 ft is roughly 60 dBA, while loud jet engine noises equate to 110 dBA at approximately 100 ft, which can cause serious discomfort. Another important aspect of noise is the duration of the sound and the way it is described and distributed in time. Environmental noise descriptors are generally based on averages, rather than instantaneous, noise levels. The most commonly used figure is the equivalent continuous sound level (Leq). Equivalent 4-82 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage 1�/ 0,� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J sound levels are not measured directly but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A-weighted decibels. The Leq represents a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over a given sample period and is commonly used to describe the "average" noise levels within the environment. Peak-hour or average noise levels, while useful, do not completely describe a given noise environment. Noise levels lower than peak hour may be disturbing if they occur during times when quiet is most desirable, namely evening and nighttime (sleeping) hours. To account for this, the day- night average noise level (Ldn) and the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), representing a composite 24-hour noise level, are utilized. The Ldn and CNEL are weighted averages of the intensity of a sound, with corrections for time of day, and are averaged over 24 hours. The Ldn time-of-day corrections include the addition of 10 dB to dBA Leq sound levels at night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The CNEL time-of-day corrections require the addition of 5 dB to dBA Leq sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. in addition to the corrections for the Lan. These additions are made to account for the noise-sensitive time periods during the evening and nighttime hours when sound appears louder. Ldn and CNEL do not represent the actual sound level heard at any time, but rather represent the total sound exposure. The City relies on the 24-hour Lan level to assess land use compatibility with transportation-related noise sources; however, this analysis uses the CNEL noise level to apply the more conservative evening hour corrections to the 24-hour noise levels. Community responses to noise may range from registering a complaint by telephone or letter to initiating court action, depending upon everyone's susceptibility to and personal attitudes about noise. Several factors are related to the level of community annoyance, including: • Fear associated with noise-producing activities; • Socioeconomic status and education level; • Perception that those affected are being unfairly treated; • Attitudes regarding the usefulness of the noise-producing activity; • Belief that the noise source can be controlled. Approximately 10 percent of the population has a very low tolerance for noise and will object to any noise not of their making. Consequently, even in the quietest environment, some complaints will occur. Another 25 percent of the population will not complain even in very severe noise environments. Thus, a variety of reactions can be expected from people exposed to any given noise environment. Surveys have shown that about 10 percent of the people exposed to traffic noise of 60 dBA will report being highly annoyed with the noise, and each increase of 1 dBA is associated with approximately 2 percent more people being highly annoyed. When traffic noise exceeds 60 dBA or aircraft noise exceeds 55 dBA, people may begin to complain. An increase or decrease of 1 dBA cannot be perceived except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 3 dBA is considered barely perceptible, and changes of 5 dBA are considered readily perceptible. Vibration Fundamentals. Per the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment, vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of room surfaces is called structure-borne noise. Sources of ground- borne vibrations include natural phenomena (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sea waves, landslides) or human-made causes (e.g., explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> Page 3774-83 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 equipment). Vibration sources may be continuous, such as factory machinery, or transient, such as explosions. As is the case with airborne sound, amplitude and frequency may describe ground-borne vibrations. Several different methods are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal. The PPV is most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings, but it is not always suitable for evaluating human response (annoyance) because it takes some time for the human body to respond to vibration signals. Instead, the human body responds to average vibration amplitude often described as the root- mean-square (RMS). The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal and is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body. Decibel notation (VdB) is commonly used to measure RMS. Decibel notation (VdB) serves to reduce the range of numbers used to describe human response to vibration. Typically, ground-borne vibration generated by man-made activities attenuates rapidly with distance from the source of the vibration. Sensitive receivers for vibration include structures (especially older masonry structures), people (especially residents,the elderly, and sick), and vibration-sensitive equipment. The background vibration-velocity level in residential areas is generally 50 VdB. Ground-borne vibration is normally perceptible to humans at approximately 65 VdB. For most people, a vibration- velocity level of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground-borne vibration are construction equipment, steel-wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is smooth, the ground- borne vibration is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50 VdB, which is the typical background vibration-velocity level, to 100 VdB, which is the general threshold where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings. Significance Criteria. Based on the significance of noise impacts outlined below in Table 4.13.A, noise impacts shall be considered significant if any of the following occur as a direct result of the proposed development. Table 4.13.A: Significance Criteria Summary Significance Criteria Analysis Condition(s) Daytime I Nighttime Exterior Noise Level Criteria 70 dBA CNEL conditionally acceptable On Site Traffic Noisel Interior Noise Level Criteria 45 dBA CNEL Permitted hours of 7:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.on weekdays,including Saturdays,with no activity Construction Noise allowed on Sundays and holidays.2 and Vibration Noise Level Threshold 65 dBA Leq N/A Vibration Level Threshold3 0.12 in/sec RMS N/A 1 Source:City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Public Health and Safety Element,Figure PS-8. 2 Source:City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code,Section 17.66.050(D)(4)(Appendix 3.1). 3 Source:City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code,Section 17.66.070(Appendix 3.1). "Daytime"=7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime""= 10:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m.; "N/A"= No nighttime construction activity is permitted and,therefore,no nighttime construction noise level threshold is identified. CNEL=Community Noise Equivalent Level Leq=equivalent continuous sound level dBA=A-weighted decibel(s) RMS=root-mean-square in/sec=inch(es)per second 4-84 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J On-Site Traffic Noise. • If the on-site exterior noise levels exceed 70 dBA CNEL at the multifamily residential use and the interior noise levels exceed 45 dBA CNEL (City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Public Health &Safety Element, Figure PS-8). Construction Noise and Vibration. • If Project-related construction activities occur at any time other than the permitted hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays and generate noise levels that exceed the 65 dBA Leq noise level limit at adjacent sensitive residential land uses (City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Section 17.66.050 (D) (4)); • If short-term Project-generated construction vibration levels exceed the City of Rancho Cucamonga acceptable vibration standard of 0.12 inch per second (in/sec) RMS at sensitive receiver locations (City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Section 17.66.070). Existing Noise Environment. To assess the existing noise level environment, five 24-hour noise level measurements were taken at sensitive receiver locations in the Project study area. The receiver locations were selected to describe and document the existing noise environment within the Project study area. Figure 4.13.1, Noise Measurement Locations, provides the boundaries of the Project study area and the noise level measurement locations. To fully describe the existing noise conditions, noise level measurements were collected on Wednesday, December 14, 2016, as part of the Noise Impact Analysis by Urban Crossroads Inc. (January 2017). Long-Term Noise Measurement Results. The noise measurements presented below focus on the average or equivalent sound levels (Leq). The Leq represents a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over a given sample period. The daily noise level at each location is also provided below in Table 4.13.13. CVWD Well Site and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Construction Activities. Located adjacent to the Project's southwestern site boundaries, the CVWD well site includes a well pump and enclosed electrical equipment. While an existing 6 ft high perimeter wall surrounds the well site,the well pump itself is taller than the wall and therefore represents a potential unmitigated noise source adjacent to the Project. Measurement locations L3 and L4 were chosen to describe the existing noise levels due to the operation of the well pump. Based on these measurement locations, the noise levels are shown to range from 59.0 to 61.3 dBALeq during daytime hours and from 58.8 to 61.6 dBA Leq during nighttime hours. The exterior noise levels represent those typical of a residential neighborhood during daytime hours, with slightly higher noise levels during nighttime hours, likely due to the operation of the well pump, background construction activities, and traffic noise levels from Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-85 Page 379 U _v Q 1 jr ° GA05A R w•� gQ� - vl SITEI Y N14. i AU0 I FOOTHILL BLVD - Source:Esri,DigitalGlobe,GeoEye,Earthstor Geographics,CNESJAirbdrV",SDA,USGS,--� —* P W Ae-GRID 1GN,nad the 615 U4 C—vll w , ILr � LEGEND: Noise Measurement Locations L SA FIGURE 4.13.1 N Westbury Residential Project SOURCE:Urban Crossroads Noise Measurement Locations I:\STR1901\G\Noise Measurement Locations.cdr(7/1/2019) Page 380 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» 4.87 Page 381 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 4.13.B: 24-Hour Ambient Noise Level Measurements Distance to Energy Average Hourly Project Boundary Noise Level(dBA LeJ2 Location' (feet) Description Daytime Nighttime CNEL L1 445 Located north of the Project site and adjacent 57.2 57.8 64.4 to an existing 6-foot-high barrier at existing residential homes on Garcia Road. L2 90 Located east of the Project site and adjacent to 63.7 61.7 68.7 a 6-foot-high barrier at existing residential homes on East Avenue. L3 0 Located within the Project site and north of an 61.3 61.6 68.2 existing well pump. L4 35 Located south of the Project site and east of an 59.0 58.8 65.5 existing well pump. L5 660 Located south of the Project site,across Foothill 66.3 63.7 71.0 Boulevard,and adjacent to existing residential homes. 1 See Exhibit 4.13.1 for the noise level measurement locations. Z Energy(logarithmic)average hourly levels. "Daytime"=7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.;"Nighttime"=10:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. CNEL=Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA=A-weighted decibel(s) Leq=equivalent continuous sound level While the exterior noise levels adjacent to the well site are generally consistent with those of typical residential areas, some single-event noise levels may be heard at the Project site when the well pump equipment cycles on and off. Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Short-Term Construction-Related Noise Impacts. Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that, when combined, can reach high levels. This construction noise analysis was prepared using reference noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc., to describe the typical construction activity noise levels for residential construction. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 62 dBA to in excess of 80 dBA when measured at 50 ft. However, these noise levels diminish with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 80 dBA measured at 50 ft from the noise source to the receiver would be reduced to 74 dBA at 100 ft from the source to the receiver, and would be further reduced to 68 dBA at 200 ft from the source to the receiver. Based on the reference construction noise levels, the Project-related construction noise levels when the peak reference noise level is operating at a single point nearest the sensitive receiver location from the center of construction activity will range from 52.8 to 67.7 dBA Leq at the sensitive receiver locations in Rancho Cucamonga. Construction noise impacts would remain below the 65 dBA Leq 4-88 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study—Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage 1�/ Q� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J construction noise level threshold at all receptors surrounding the site except at the vacant lot immediately south of the Project,which is proposed to contain residential uses. Therefore, temporary construction noise mitigation barriers are required at the construction boundaries near the impacted receiver locations where Project construction noise levels could potentially exceed the noise level thresholds. The construction noise analysis presents a conservative, worst-case approach with the highest noise-level-producing equipment for each stage of Project construction operating at the closest point from the center of construction activity to the nearby sensitive receiver locations. This scenario is unlikely to occur during typical construction activities and likely overstates the construction noise levels that will be experienced at each receiver location. With the installation of temporary exterior noise control barriers at the minimum height of 9 ft, a reduction of 8.5 dBA would occur, reducing noise levels to 59.2 dBA Leq. It is important to note that the temporary construction noise barrier is only necessary if the residential uses immediately to the south of the Project are fully constructed and occupied at the time of Project construction. Long-Term On-Site Traffic Noise Impacts. It is expected that the primary source of noise impacts to the Project site will be traffic noise from Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. The Project will also experience some background traffic noise impacts from the Project's internal parking lot; however, due to the low traffic volume/speeds, traffic noise from the parking areas will not make a significant contribution to the noise environment. Exterior Noise Analysis. Using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA RD-77-108) and the parameters outlined in Section 6 of the Noise Impact Analysis, the expected future exterior noise levels for the on-site building were calculated. The on-site traffic noise level impacts indicate that the units facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will experience unmitigated exterior noise levels ranging from 58.9 to 70.5 dBA CNEL. With unmitigated exterior traffic noise levels approaching 70.5 dBA CNEL at buildings facing East Avenue, the Project's multifamily residential land use is considered normally unacceptable land use, requiring a detailed analysis of the interior noise reduction requirements needed to satisfy the interior noise level standard of 45 dBA CNEL. Since there are no outdoor living areas requiring exterior noise mitigation at the buildings facing East Avenue, no exterior noise mitigation is required. Interior Noise Analysis. To provide the necessary interior noise level reduction, the Noise Impact Analysis indicates that residential buildings facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will require a windows-closed condition and a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). The future unmitigated noise levels at the first-floor building fagade are expected to range from 58.9 to 70.5 dBA CNEL. The first-floor interior noise level analysis shows that the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise level standard can be satisfied using upgraded windows with a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 29 for buildings adjacent to East Avenue and standard windows with a minimum STC rating of 27 for all other buildings. The future noise levels at the second- and third-floor building fagades are expected to range from 58.9 to 70.4 dBA CNEL. Upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of 29 for buildings adjacent PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20)> 4-89 Page 383 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 to East Avenue and standard windows with a minimum STC rating of 27 for all other buildings are required to satisfy the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise level standard. The interior noise analysis shows that with the recommended interior noise mitigation measures described in N0I-2, the Project will satisfy the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise level standards for residential development. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: N0I-1 Construction Noise and Vibration: Prior to issuance of building permits,the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that grading and construction plans include the following requirements: • If the future residential land use immediately south of the Project site is fully built and occupied at the time of Project construction, install minimum 9-foot- high temporary construction noise barriers at the Project's southern site boundary for the duration of mobile-equipment construction activities. The noise control barriers must present a solid face from top to bottom. The noise control barriers must meet the minimum height and be constructed as follows: o The barriers shall provide a minimum transmission loss of 20 A-weighted decibels (dBA). The noise barrier shall be constructed using an acoustical blanket (e.g., vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets) attached to the construction site perimeter fence or equivalent temporary fence posts. o The noise barrier must be maintained and any damage promptly repaired. Gaps, holes, or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired. o The noise control barrier and associated elements shall be completely removed and the site appropriately restored upon conclusion of the construction activity. • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that 4-90 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. ge 6/caNl INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J emitted noise is directed away from the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during all Project construction. • The construction contractor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment (between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays). The contractor shall prepare a haul route exhibit and shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck-related noise. N0I-2 Interior Noise Mitigation: To satisfy the City's 45 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) interior noise level criteria, units facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will require a noise reduction of up to 25.5 dBA and a windows-closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). To meet the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards, the Project shall provide the following or equivalent noise mitigation measures: • Windows: o All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well-fitted, well-weather- stripped assemblies and shall have the following minimum sound transmission class (STC)ratings: ■ Windows facing East Avenue in Buildings 1, 2, 3, and 10 require upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of 29. ■ All other buildings require standard windows with minimum STC ratings of 27. • Doors: All exterior doors shall be well-weather-stripped, solid-core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. • Walls: At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts, or conduits, the space between the wall and pipes, ducts, or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtightseal. • Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well-fitted or caulked plywood of at least 0.5 inch thick. Ceilings shall be well-fitted, fully sealed gypsum board of at least 0.5 inch thick. Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 38 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 • Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and still receive circulated air. A forced air circulation system (e.g., air conditioning) or active ventilation system (e.g., fresh air supply) shall be provided that satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. • Notices: Occupancy disclosure notices are recommended for all future tenants of the residential units within the Project site. The disclosure notices should state that the units may be exposed to infrequent noise events from the adjacent Cucamonga Valley Water District well site. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures, and soil type. It is expected that ground- borne vibration from Project construction activities would cause only intermittent, localized intrusion.The proposed Project's construction activities most likely to cause vibration impacts are: • Heavy Construction Equipment: Although all heavy mobile construction equipment has the potential to cause at least some perceptible vibration while operating close to a building, the vibration is usually short-term and not of sufficient magnitude to cause building damage. It is not expected that heavy equipment such as large bulldozers would operate close enough to any residences to cause a vibration impact. • Trucks: Trucks hauling building materials to construction sites can be sources of vibration intrusion if the haul routes pass through residential neighborhoods on streets with bumps or potholes. Repairing the bumps and potholes generally eliminates the problem. Ground-borne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring within the Project site were estimated by data published by the FTA. Construction activities that would have the potential to generate low levels of ground-borne vibration within the Project site include grading. Using the vibration source level of construction equipment and the construction vibration assessment methodology published by the FTA, it is possible to estimate the Project vibration impacts. Based on the reference vibration levels provided by the FTA, a large bulldozer represents the peak source of vibration, with a reference velocity of 0.089 in/sec PPV at 25 feet. At distances ranging from 112 to 545 ft from Project construction activities, construction vibration velocity levels are expected to approach 0.0094 in/sec PPV. To assess the human perception of vibration levels in PPV, the velocities are converted to RMS vibration levels based on the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual conversion factor of 0.71. The highest construction vibration levels in RMS are expected to approach 0.007 in/sec RMS at receiver location R5. Based on the City's vibration standards, the proposed Project construction activities will satisfy the vibration standard of 0.12 in/sec RMS at all receiver locations during Project construction. Further, Section 4-92 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1f& INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 17.66.070 (D) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code exempts the equipment specific to temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that leave a Project site from the vibration level standards. The vibration impacts due to Project construction represent temporary perceptible vibration levels that may cause annoyance in residential areas; however, they do not represent vibration levels capable of causing building damage to nearby residential homes. The FTA identifies construction vibration levels capable of building damage as ranging from 0.12 to 0.5 in/sec PPV.The peak Project- construction vibration levels, approaching 0.009 in/sec PPV, will not exceed the FTA vibration levels for building damage at the residential uses near the Project site. Further, the impacts at the site of the closest sensitive receivers are unlikely to be sustained during the entire construction period, but would occur rather only during the times that heavy construction equipment is operating adjacent to the Project site perimeter. Construction at the Project site would be restricted to daytime hours, consistent with City requirements, thereby eliminating potential vibration impacts during the sensitive nighttime hours. Therefore, the Project-related vibration impacts would result in a less than significant impact during the worst-case construction activities at the Project site boundary. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The Project is approximately 6 mi northeast of LA/Ontario International Airport and is not in close proximity to a private airstrip; therefore, the noise-related impact due to airport activities would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 3874-93 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ elsewhere? Impact Analysis a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? The proposed Project includes the development of a gated residential community consisting of 131 for-rent residential units (73 one-bedroom and 58 two-bedroom floor plans), 4 commercial- ready units, and 1,592 sf of commercial space. The Project would have a net density of 22.8 du/ac and would provide approximately 116,155 sf of leasable dwelling space (including commercial space attached to select residential units) and 39,467 sf of shared recreational area. Because the existing use of the Project site is not residential, the proposed Project would result in a net increase of 131 residential units in Rancho Cucamonga, which may slightly increase the residential population in the city. According to the California Department of Finance City/Population and Housing Estimates (January 1, 2019),56 the average number of persons per dwelling unit in Rancho Cucamonga in 2019 was 3.09 persons. Based on the City's average occupancy rate of 3.09 persons per unit, the proposed Project would introduce 404 persons into the Project area. 57 The introduction of approximately 404 new residents would be approximately 0.2 percent of the city's population of 174,573 in 2017,5' and 0.2 percent of the city's projected population of 173,900 in 2020.59 The assumption of 404 new residents is a conservative estimate that assumes all of the occupants of the new residences provided by the Project are new residents to the city and does not account for a scenario in which some existing residents of the city relocate to the proposed residential units. The increase in population resulting from the proposed Project is not considered significant because it comprises only a small portion (less than 1 percent) of the total population of Rancho Cucamonga and does not represent a substantial increase in population. 56 California Department of Finance. 2019. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State,2011-2019 with 2010 Census Benchmark City/County Population and Housing Estimates. May. S7 131 du x 3.09 persons/du=403.48,or 404 persons 58 United States Census Bureau. 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates,Table DP05. 4-94 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study—Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J In addition, the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) Allocation Plan, mandated by the California State Housing Element law as part of the process of updating local housing elements of the General Plan, has quantified a range of housing needs by income groups for each jurisdiction during specific planning periods. According to the City's 2010 General Plan Housing Element, SCAG has established a RHNA goal for the City to develop 848 new housing units by the year 2021. Of these 848 units, 209 would be set aside for Very Low-Income groups, 141 for Low-Income groups, 158 for Moderate-Income groups, and 340 for Above-Moderate-Income groups. The proposed Project would develop the Project site with 131 new market-rate housing units, which would help to meet the City's current housing needs and RHNA goal. Additionally, the proposed Project is surrounded by urban uses to the north, south, and west, including single-family residential uses and a utility corridor containing a CVWD pumping station adjacent to the southern boundary of the Project site. While the Project would include infrastructure improvements (such as utility connections to the existing undeveloped site) to serve the proposed mixed-use development, the Project does not propose to expand surrounding utility infrastructure in the Project vicinity, nor does the Project include roadway expansions that would indirectly induce growth. For the reasons stated above, the proposed Project would not result in substantial unplanned growth, nor would the Project directly or indirectly induce population growth through the extension of roads or other infrastructure. Therefore, potential impacts related to substantial inducement of population growth would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. No housing currently exists on the Project site, and housing displacement would not occur as a result of Project implementation. Because the Project site does not currently contain any permanent occupants, no people would be displaced as a result of the development of the proposed Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would not displace substantial numbers of people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: No Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-95 Page 389 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.15 PUBLIC SERVICES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i. Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ii. Police protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iii. Schools? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ iv. Parks? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ v. Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Impact Analysis a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: This section is, in part, based on information solicited through written correspondence with public service providers. Written responses from public service providers is provided in Appendix K. i Fire protection? The RCFPD provides a wide array of services to the community, including emergency medical services, structure fire protection, fire suppression and prevention, response to hazardous and toxic material release, and technical rescue.The RCFPD operates seven fire stations and employs 120 full- and part-time RCFPD employees to serve nearly 170,000 residents in a 50-square-mile area, which includes all of Rancho Cucamonga and 10 square miles of unincorporated land adjacent to the San Bernardino National Forest.bo Fire Station No. 173 is the closest fire station to the proposed Project site and is located at 12270 Fire House Court, Rancho Cucamonga. The Project site, which itself is located northwest of the West Foothill Boulevard/East Avenue intersection, is approximately 1.63 mi southeast of Fire Station No. 173. Fire Station No. 173 would be the first to the Project site in the event of an emergency and would therefore be the "first-in" station. Fire Station No. 173 has a dedicated Hazardous Materials Team. This specialized team is trained in both biological and chemical hazardous materials 60 Written correspondence with Robert Ball, Fire Marshall, RCFPD.June 18, 2019. 4-96 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J emergency response. RCFPD provides rapid response and assessment of life threatening situations and has an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) program, which consists of certified paramedics who provide Advanced Life Support (ALS) services. The RCFPD employs 112 full-time employees and 8 part-time employees.61 In 2018, the RCFPD responded to approximately 16,650 incidents. Of these, approximately 75 percent of the incidents were for EMS, 12 percent were for fire, and 13 percent were for other purposes (e.g., hazardous materials response, water salvages, and public service requests).62 The RCFPD has a response time goal of 4 minutes to any location within the Fire District. Travel time is defined as the time from when the dispatched crew leaves the station until they arrive at the address of the emergen Cy.63 The RCFPD plans to relocate Station No. 172 to a location approximately 1 mi west of its current location. The RCFPD also plans to construct an eighth station, Station No. 178, at approximately Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. According to the RCFPD, these expansions/relocations were developed independently of the proposed Project and are not necessitated as a result of the proposed Project.64 According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Resource Assessment Program,the Project site is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ).61 Emergency access to the Project site would be provided via two driveways off East Avenue. As discussed in Section 4.17, Transportation, the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase in traffic congestion or significant impacts at local intersections that would delay emergency vehicles.Therefore,the proposed Project would not impair emergency response vehicles or increase response times. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project would result in an increase of 131 residential units, which would add approximately 404 new residents and increase the number of on-site visitors and personnel. Construction and operation of the proposed Project may result in increased demand for fire protection services, but it would not trigger the need for new or altered facilities. Based on consultation with the RCFPD, the proposed Project can be adequately served by existing fire stations, and no new or altered facilities are needed to serve the uses that would be allowed by the Project.66 Consequently, RCFPD would be able to maintain current levels of service provided to Rancho Cucamonga, including the Project site, following Project implementation. Moreover, all development within the Project area would be reviewed by the RCFPD for compliance with the applicable provisions of the California Fire and Residential Codes along with the requirements of the RCFPD's Standards and Guidance documents, including, but not limited to, requirements for fire apparatus access roads, gates, address and building signage, Knox boxes, fire protection water supply systems, and site plan criteria. Therefore, potential impacts 61 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010i.Overview of Departmental Operating Budgets. 62 Written correspondence with Robert Ball, Fire Marshall, RCFPD.June 18, 2019. 63 Ibid. 64 Ibid. 65 CAL FIRE.2012. FHSZ Viewer.Website: https:Hegis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/(accessed June 22,2019). 66 Written correspondence with Robert Ball, Fire Marshall, RCFPD.June 18, 2019. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4_97 Page 391 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 related to fire protection services would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: ii Police protection? The City contracts with the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department (SBSD) for police protection services. The SBSD has one station within Rancho Cucamonga, located at 10510 Civic Center Drive, approximately 3.45 mi southwest of the Project site, and a Sheriff's substation at Victoria Gardens, approximately 0.93 mi west of the Project site. The SBSD's Rancho Cucamonga Patrol Station is responsible for providing law enforcement to 40 square miles. Police service needs are determined by performing periodic analysis of various factors, including officer-per-capita ratio, number of calls for service, and officer unstructured time. The Rancho Cucamonga Patrol Station's SBSD staffing level in 2018 was 141 sworn officers, 41 nonsworn officers/general employees, and 90 volunteers.67 The City has established a goal of providing approximately one officer for every 1,080 residents.68 According to the SBSD's 2018 statistics, the current staffing ratio is 0.61 deputy per 1,000 residents.69 As such, the City's goal standard is not currently being met. The SBSD's performance standard is a response time of 4 minutes and 16 seconds or less for emergency calls. According to the SBSD, the Rancho Cucamonga Patrol Station's actual average emergency response time is 1 minute and 42 seconds.70 As previously stated in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project would increase Rancho Cucamonga's population by approximately 404 residents. The proposed Project would incrementally contribute to demand for additional police protection services. When considered with the existing (2018) population of 177,751 residents and the current SBSD staffing level of 0.61 deputy per 1,000 residents, the Project-related population increase's impact on the SBSD's ratio of police officers per resident would be minimal (0.4 officer).71 Therefore, the increase in population associated with the proposed Project would be minimal compared to the number of police officers 67 Written correspondence with Casey Jiles, Lieutenant,SBSD, Rancho Cucamonga Station.June 27, 2019. 68 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010c.General Plan EIR. 69 Written correspondence with Casey Jiles, Lieutenant,SBSD, Rancho Cucamonga Station.June 27, 2019. 70 Ibid. 71 177,751 (2018 population) / 1,080 residents = 164.5 officers needed to meet City's goal ratio. 177,751 (2018 population) +404 Project-related increase in residents = 178,155/ 1,080 residents = 164.9 officers needed to meet ratio. 164.9—164.5=0.4 additional officer. 4-98 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 66/1fi� INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J currently employed by the City and would not trigger the need for new or physically altered police facilities. The SBSD is currently in the process of developing a West Side Public Safety Substation approximately 5.7 mi west of the Project site, near the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road. This substation is anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2020. In addition, the City requires payment of an in-lieu fee to prevent new residential and nonresidential development from reducing the quality and availability of public services provided to residents of Rancho Cucamonga by requiring new residential development to contribute to the cost of expanding the availability of police assets in Rancho Cucamonga.72 Payment of these in-lieu fees, as required by RCM-PS-1, would serve to reduce Project-related impacts to police protection to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts to police services would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures. No mitigation is required; however, the proposed Project would be required to comply with the City's Municipal Code, Section 3.64, Police Impact Fee, as detailed below. RCM-PS-1 Payment of Police Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required Police Impact Fees in accordance with Section 3.64, Police Impact Fee, of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: iii Schools? The Project site is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of two school districts: Etiwanda School District (ESD) for elementary and intermediate school73 and Chaffey Joint Union High School District (CJUHSD)for high school.74 Etiwanda School District. The ESD currently serves students in grades kindergarten through 8. The ESD operates 20 schools/programs, including 13 elementary schools, 4 intermediate schools, and 3 alternative education programs. The Project site is assigned to West Heritage Elementary School (approximately 0.5 mi northeast of the Project site in Fontana) and Heritage Intermediate School 72 City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,Section 3.64, Police Impact Fee. 73 Etiwanda School District. 2017.Attendance Boundaries Effective July 1, 2017. 74 Chaff ey Joint Union High School District. 2011. Boundary Map. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 4-gg Page 393 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 (approximately 1 mi northeast of the Project site in Fontana).75 The current enrollment and capacity of these schools is shown below in Table 4.14.A. Table 4.14.A: Etiwanda School District Capacities and Enrollment School/Location Grade Current Capacity Current Enrollment Remaining Capacity West Heritage School K-5 874 684 190 13690 West Constitution Way,Fontana Heritage Intermediate 6-8 1,536 1,250 286 13766 South Heritage Circle,Fontana Source:Written correspondence with Pam Polchow,Administrative Assistant II,Business Services,Etiwanda School District,on June 13,2019,and June 18,2019. Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The CJUHSD currently serves approximately 25,000 students in grades 9 through 12. The CJUHSD operates 12 schools/programs: 8 high schools and 4 alternative education schools (e.g., adult schools, continuing education, a community day school, and an online school).76 Etiwanda High School would serve as the school of attendance for residents of the proposed Project."The current enrollment and capacity of the schools nearest to the Project site is shown in Table 4.14.A, School Capacities and Enrollment. CJUHSD student generation rates for single-family attached residential units were used to analyze the estimated students generated as a result of Project implementation. Based on these generation factors, it is assumed that the 131 residential units proposed would generate approximately 35 high school students (refer to Table 4.14.1), CJUHSD Projected School Enrollments). The Project-related increase in students projected as a result of Project implementation would incrementally increase the demand for school facilities. However, as illustrated by Tables 3.14.A through 3.14.D, the existing elementary, middle, and high schools serving the Project site would have sufficient capacity to serve the Project-related increase in schoolchildren. Furthermore, written correspondence with ESD and CJUHSD confirmed that the districts are not planning to construct new schools to serve the area because there is not currently a need for an additional school in the area and implementation of the Project would not generate such a need for additional facilities.'$ 75 Source:Written correspondence with Pam Polchow,Administrative Assistant Il, Business Services, ESD, on June 13, 2019,and June 18,2019. 71 Chaffey Joint Union High School District. 2018.About the District. 77 Written correspondence with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD,June 19, 2019. 78 Written correspondence with Pam Polchow, Administrative Assistant Il, Business Services, ESD, June 13, 2019, and phone conversation with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD,June 19, 2018. 4-100 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cage INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Table 4.14.13: Etiwanda School District Projected Enrollment Grade Levels Student Generation Factor Projected Enrollment Elementary School 0.3033 student/unit 39.7 students Intermediate School 0.1286 student/unit 16.8 students Total Students(rounded to whole number) 57 Source:Written correspondence with Pam Polchow,Administrative Assistant II,Business Services,Etiwanda School District,on June 13,2019. 1 Current enrollment includes the number of students actually attending the school in 2017-2018. 2 Current capacity includes the school's current operating capacity or the number of students the school can serve while operating during the current calendar year. Table 4.14.C: CJUHSD School Capacities and Enrollment School Grade Current Capacityz Current Enrollment Under Capacity Etiwanda High School 9-12 4,1243 3,497 628 13500 Victoria Avenue Source:Phone conversation with Mike Harrison,Director of Operations,Planning and Facilities,CJUHSD,June 19,2019. 1 Current enrollment includes the number of students actually attending the school in 2017-2018. 2 Current capacity includes the school's current operating capacity or the number of students the school can serve while operating during the current calendar year. 3 The 2017-2018 capacity was approximately 3,580.Etiwanda High School is currently constructing 16 new classrooms,which will be complete and in use by January 2020.These plans are independent of the proposed Project. CJUHSD maintains a standard of 34 students per classroom.These new classrooms will increase Etiwanda High School's capacity by 544 students by the time the proposed Project is developed.Per a phone conversation on June 19,2019,with Mike Harrison,Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities for CJUHSD, this environmental analysis should consider the 2017-2018 capacity plus facilities expansion for this environmental analysis.Without the additional classrooms,Etiwanda High School would still be under capacity by 83. CJUHSD=Chaffey Joint Union High School District Table 4.14.D: CJUHSD Projected School Enrollment Grade Levels Student Generation Factor Projected Enrollment High School 0.2626 students 34.4 students Total Students(rounded to whole number) 35.0 students Source:CJUHSD,Developer Fee Justification Study.2008. Note:The Projected enrollment is based on the proposed Project size of 131 multifamily residential units. CJUHSD=Chaffey Joint Union High School District Summary. Pursuant to California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1), the governing board of any school district is authorized to levy a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement against any construction within the boundaries of the district for the purpose of funding the construction or reconstruction of school facilities. The Project Applicant would be required to pay such fees to reduce any Project-related impacts on school services as provided in Section 65995 of the California Government Code. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65996, a project's impact on school facilities is fully mitigated through payment of the requisite school facility development fees current at the time a building permit is issued. P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 39 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 The current ESD Development Impact Fee for new development projects is $2.90 per residential square foot, $3,489 per residential unit, and $0.42 per commercial square foot.79 The current CJUHSD Developer Impact Fee for new development projects is $1.17 per residential square foot and $0.19 per commercial square foot.80 Therefore, with payment of the required fees to reduce any impacts of new development on school services (refer to RCM-PS-2, below), potential impacts to school services and facilities associated with implementation of the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measure. No mitigation is required; however, the proposed Project is required to comply with California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1). RCM-PS-2 Payment of School Development Fee. Pursuant to California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1), the governing board of any school district is authorized to levy a fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement against any construction within the boundaries of the district for the purpose of funding the construction or reconstruction of school facilities. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant/Developer shall submit proof of payment of all applicable school facility development fees to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Director of Planning, or designee. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: iv Parks? As discussed in Section 4.16, Recreation, the City maintains and operates 36 park properties that account for 347.7 ac of parklands and recreational facilities, and a Multi-Use Regional Community Trails network that accounts for 295 ac of land for recreational use. In total, there is 642.6 ac of park and recreational land available for use by the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. The closest park to the Project site is Garcia Park, approximately 170 feet northwest of the Project boundary and 400 feet north of the Project site's area of development at 13150 Garcia Drive. Amenities at this park include picnic tables, barbecues, a playground, a full-size basketball court, and an exercise course. 79 Written correspondence with Pam Polchow, Administrative Assistant II, Business Services, ESD, June 13, 2019, and phone conversation with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD,June 19, 2018. S0 Phone conversation with Mike Harrison, Director of Operations, Planning and Facilities, CJUHSD,June 19, 2019. 4-102 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1yk INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J The Community Services Element of the City's General Plan requires the provision of 5 ac of parkland per 1,000 residents. Given the existing (2018) population of 177,751 residents, the City would need to provide 888.755 ac of parklands and recreational facilities to meet this standard. The City currently provides 347.6 ac of developed parkland and special use facilities and 294.6 ac of multipurpose and community trails, for a total of 642.2 ac of parkland within the city. As such, the City is not currently meeting the standard of 5 ac of parkland per 1,000 residents. As discussed above, development of the proposed Project would result in an increase of 404 new residents. T addition of 404 residents generated by the proposed Project would require an additional 2.02 ac of parkland.81 The proposed Project includes the development of 39,467 sf (0.9 ac) of common usable space consisting of active and passive recreational amenities. Amenities include a pool and spa, barbecue facilities, a clubhouse, common open space areas, and multiple sport court areas (volleyball, cornhole, badminton, bocce ball, and horseshoes). Although the Project would provide on-site recreational space that can be used by the residents, it would not provide the required 2.02 ac of parkland. Although implementation of the proposed Project would cause an incremental increase in demand for parks, this increase would be partially offset by the inclusion of on-site recreational areas reserved for Project occupants and guests. In addition, the City requires payment of an in-lieu fee for upgrades to existing parks. Payment of these in-lieu fees, as required by RCM-PS-3 would serve to reduce Project-related impacts to parks to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts to parks and recreational facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures. No mitigation is required; however, the proposed Project would be required to comply with City Municipal Code Chapter 3.68.030. RCM-PS-3 Payment of Park Impact Fee. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required park in-lieu/park impact fees as established in Chapter 3.68.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, or the need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: v Other public facilities? S1 404 additional residents generated by the project * 5 ac per 1,000 residents, or 404 * 5/ 1,000 = 2.02 ac of parkland required as part of the project to meet the City's standard. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 39 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 The Archibald Library, located at 7368 Archibald Avenue, is approximately 4.6 mi northwest of the Project site. This library facility is approximately 22,500 sf and houses 165,000 items.82 The Paul A. Biane Library at Victoria Gardens is approximately 23,000 sf and contains a book and media collection of 100,000 items, a 21-seat technology center, a story room, and a traditional reading room.The library has an additional 14,000 sf on the second level that is currently unused. As discussed above, development of the proposed Project would result in an increase of an estimated 404 new residents. Although implementation of the proposed Project would cause an increase in demand for library facilities, this increase would be minimal. In addition, the City requires payment of an in-lieu fee to prevent new residential development from reducing the quality and availability of public services provided to residents of Rancho Cucamonga by requiring new residential development to contribute to the cost of expanding the availability of library and cultural center assets in the city.83 Payment of these in-lieu fees, as required by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 3.56 (refer to RCM-PS-4), would serve to reduce Project-related impacts to libraries to a less than significant level. Therefore, impacts to library facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures. No mitigation is required; however, the proposed Project would be required to comply with City Municipal Code Section 3.56. RCM-PS-4 Payment of Library Impact Fee. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required Library Impact Fees as established in Section 3.56 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. S2 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010c.General Plan EIR. S3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,Section 3.56, Library Impact Fee. 4-104 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study—Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cag 6e/1�/�QZ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.16 RECREATION Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which ❑ ❑ ® ❑ might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Impact Analysis a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department (RCCSD) operates park and recreational facilities and programs for the City, including future residents of the Project, and manages scheduled park uses. The Public Works Services Department is responsible for the maintenance of park and all public facilities.The City maintains and operates 36 park properties that account for approximately 347.6 ac of parklands and recreational facilities. Parkland in the City consists of 25 neighborhood parks, 3 community parks, and 8 special-use facilities. Overall, the City has 170.3 ac of neighborhood parks, 96.0 ac of community parks, and 81.3 ac of special use facilities.84 In addition to parks and special facilities, the City's Multi-Use Regional and Community Trails add approximately 295 ac of land for recreational use.85 According to the Community Services Element,the City requires 5.0 ac of parkland for every 1,000 residents. Based on the City's estimated 2018 population of 177,75186 and the 642.6 total acres of park and recreational facilities, the City currently provides 3.615 ac of park space per 1,000 residents. Therefore, the City is not currently meeting its parkland standard of 5 ac per 1,000 residents. Based on the City's park classifications and service areas, the parks listed in Table 4.16.A would serve the Project site. However, all parks in Rancho Cucamonga could be affected because residents would be able to use any park and recreation facility in the city. S4 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010d.General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.15: Parks and Recreation. ss Ibid. S6 U.S. Census Bureau.American Fact Finder. Rancho Cucamonga,California 2018 Population Estimate. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 39 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 4.16.A: Parks and Recreational Facilities in the Project Vicinity Distance from Size Name and Address Project Site' Type Amenities (miles) (acres) Garcia Park 0.19 Neighborhood 5.5 Reservable and nonreservable picnic tables, 13150 Garcia Drive Park barbecues,playground,full-size basketball Rancho Cucamonga court,baseball field,exercise course Victoria Arbors Park 1.09 Neighborhood 9.1 Reservable uncovered picnic shelter, 7429 Arbor Lane Park nonreservable picnic tables,barbecues, Rancho Cucamonga playground,full-size basketball court, softball/baseball field exercise course Windrows Park 1.63 Neighborhood 8.0 Picnic tables,barbecue,children's play 6849 Victoria Park Lane Park equipment area,equestrian trail access, Rancho Cucamonga exercise course,half-size basketball court,two softball/baseball fields,soccer/football field with no goalposts Sources: City of Rancho Cucamonga.Parks.Website:https://www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/cs/parks/loc/(accessed June 7,2019). City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR,Chapter 4.15:Parks and Recreation(2010). Measured from the Project's proposed entrance driveway at Marshall Court. Approximately 39,467 sf (0.84 ac) of common recreational area would be included as part of the Project. On-site amenities include a pool and spa, barbecue facilities, a clubhouse, common open spaces areas, and multiple court sport areas (volleyball, cornhole, badminton, bocce ball, and horseshoes. Residents are anticipated to utilize the on-site recreational amenities and open space to a greater degree than off-site facilities due to convenience and proximity. The Project's provision of on-site open space and recreational facilities would reduce the use of parks by Project residents. Nevertheless, some Project residents would still be expected to utilize other recreational facilities. As a result,the proposed Project would create an incremental increase in the use of area parks. Increased demand for parks and other recreation services primarily results from increases in permanent population. The addition of approximately 404 new residents generated by the proposed Project could incrementally increase usage of City parks and recreational facilities. Based on the City's goal of providing 5 ac of parkland for every 1,000 residents, the proposed Project would create the need for approximately 2.02 ac of parkland in Rancho Cucamonga. The Quimby Act (State of California Planning and Zoning Law, Section 66477) allows the legislative body of a city to require the dedication of land for park facilities and/or the payment of in-lieu fees for park and recreational purposes as a condition to the approval for a final tract map or parcel map for certain subdivisions. Section 3.68 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishes Park In- Lieu Fees/Park Impact Fees. In addition, Section 3.52 of the Municipal Code also establishes a Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee. Both Section 3.52 and Section 3.68 would be applicable to the proposed Project. The City will require the Project Applicant/Developer to pay fees as identified in RCM-REC-1. Therefore, with the provision of 0.84 ac of on-site recreation space and the payment of In-Lieu Park Fees and Recreation Center Development Fees, impacts to recreation requirements would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreation facilities such that substantial deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated. 4-106 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cx2g 66/1$/�QZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required; however, RCM-REC-1 would be implemented to reduce Project impacts to neighborhood and regional parks. RCM-REC-1 Dedication Fees. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required in-lieu park fees and community and recreation center fees as required by Section 3.52 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. c) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The proposed Project includes 0.84 ac of recreational amenities, which would be available only to residents and their guests. Additionally, there is 0.19 ac of private open space distributed throughout the residential units. The proposed Project would not include any recreational facilities that would be open to the general public. The construction of the recreational space is part of the proposed Project, and potential adverse effects associated with implementation of the recreational space have been considered throughout the analysis in this IS/MND. Therefore, the proposed Project does not include recreational facilities that would have an adverse physical effect on the environment, and no mitigation would be required. The increase in population associated with the proposed 131-unit Project would be approximately 404 residents. Based on the City's parkland requirement of 5 ac per 1,000 residents, the proposed Project would increase the demand for parkland in Rancho Cucamonga by 2.02 ac. As previously discussed in Threshold 4.16(a), the applicant is required by the City to pay in-lieu park fees and community and recreation center fees (refer to RCM-REC-1). The proposed Project does not involve the construction or expansion of recreational facilities beyond the 0.84 ac of common recreation space and 0.19 ac of private open space. Therefore, impacts related to construction or expansion of recreational facilities included in the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required; however, RCM-REC-1, presented in Response 4.16(a), would be implemented to reduce Project-related impacts to neighborhood and regional parks. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 01-107 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.17 TRANSPORTATION Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan,ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, ❑ ❑ ® ❑ subdivision(b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion This section is based on the Westbury Transportation Impact Study (Fehr & Peers, April 2020). This report is included in Appendix J. Impact Analysis a) Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Project-related traffic impacts were analyzed in the Westbury Transportation Impact Analysis (Fehr & Peers, 2020) (TIA). The TIA assessed project-related traffic impacts at the following seven area intersections: 1. Interstate 15 (1-15) southbound ramps and Foothill Boulevard 2. 1-15 northbound ramps and Foothill Boulevard 3. Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 4. East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 5. East Avenue and Project Driveway87 6. East Avenue and Project Driveway/Marshall Court 7. East Avenue and Miller Avenue The TIA evaluated the following six scenarios: • Existing(2018) Conditions • Existing(2018) Plus Project Conditions • Opening Year(2022) Conditions • Opening Year(2022) Plus Project Conditions 87 The intersection becomes a two-way-stop-controlled intersection under the Plus Project scenarios. 4-108 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cx2g 66/1$/�Q�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J • Cumulative Year(2040) Conditions • Cumulative Year(2040) Plus Project Conditions Intersection operating conditions in the study area were evaluated using the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 methodology. The HCM 2010 Methodology estimates a quantitative delay at intersections and assigns a qualitative letter grade that represents the operations of the intersection. These grades range from level of service (LOS) A (minimal delay) to LOS F (excessive congestion). LOS E represents at-capacity operations. Descriptions of the LOS letter grades are provided in Table 4.17.A, Intersection LOS Descriptions. Table 4.17.A: Intersection LOS Descriptions Level of Description Service A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length. B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths.Individual cycle failures begin to appear. D Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression,long cycle lengths,or high volume-to-capacity(V/C)ratios.Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression,long cycle lengths,and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over saturation,poor progression,or very long cycle lengths. Sources: Westbury Transportation Impact Study(Fehr&Peers 2020) Highway Capacity Manual(Transportation Research Board 2010). The relationship between LOS and delay for signalized and unsignalized intersections is summarized in Table 4.17.13, Intersection LOS Criteria. Table 4.17.113: Intersection LOS Criteria Level of Service Signalized Delay(Seconds) Unsignalized Delay(Seconds) A <10 <10 B >10 and<20 >10 and<15 C >20 and<35 >15 and<25 D >35 and<55 >25 and<35 E >55 and<80 >35 and<50 F >80 >50 Sources: Westbury Transportation Impact Study(Fehr&Peers 2020) Highway Capacity Manual(Transportation Research Board 2010). The City considers LOS D as the upper limit of acceptable operation for intersections. Caltrans considers the transition between LOS C and LOS D as the minimum acceptable standard for state facilities. As the congestion management agency, the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority considers LOS E as the minimum acceptable threshold for the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP) facilities. However, the CMP states that local agency P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 40 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 thresholds should be applied as long as they provide improved service levels compared to the CMP requirement. Given that the City and Caltrans LOS standards are LOS D and LOS C, respectively, and the CMP threshold is LOS E,the local thresholds were applied for the impact assessment. For both City of Rancho Cucamonga and Caltrans facilities, a project traffic impact occurs at an intersection if the addition of project-generated trips causes an intersection operating at an acceptable LOS to deteriorate to an unacceptable LOS, or if the project increases the delay at any intersection already operating at an unacceptable LOS. The proposed Project involves the development of a 131-unit residential development, 4 commercial-ready units, and a commercial space. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the Project is anticipated to result in a population increase of approximately 404 people. Vehicular trips associated with the proposed Project would be generated primarily from residents and their visitors.As shown on Table 4.17.C, Project Trip Generation Summary,the proposed Project would generate approximately 1,036 daily trips, 63 a.m. peak-hour trips, and 88 p.m. peak-hour trips. Table 4.17.C: Project Trip Generation Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Unit ADT I In I Out I Total In I Out Total Trip Rates' Multifamily Housing(Low-Rise) DU 7.32 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.56 Shopping Center TSF 37.75 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 Small Office Building TSF 16.19 1.59 0.33 1.92 0.78 1.67 2.45 Project Trip Generation Multifamily Housing(Low-Rise) 131 DU 959 14 46 60 46 27 73 Shopping Center 1.500 TSF 57 1 0 1 4 5 9 Small Office Building 1.200 TSF 20 2 0 2 2 4 6 Total Trip Generation 1,036 17 46 63 52 36 88 Source:Westbury Transportation Impact Study(Fehr&Peers 2020). 1 Trip rates referenced from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation Manual,10"Edition(2017). ADT=average daily trips DU=dwelling unit TSF=thousand square feet Existing Plus Project Conditions. Table 4.17.D summarizes the peak-hour LOS results for Existing Plus Project traffic conditions at the study intersections. As shown on this table, all study area intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS. With implementation of the Project, all study area intersections would continue to operate at acceptable LOS. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts based on the LOS standards and significance criteria under existing conditions. 4-110 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1$/�Ol> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Table 4.17.D: Existing Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary Existing Plus Peak Existing Project Significant Impact? Intersection Control Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS A Delay Yes/No 1 1-15 Southbound Ramps/ Signal AM 10.6 B 10.7 B 0.1 No Foothill Boulevard PM 13.4 B 13.5 B 0.1 No 2 1-15 Northbound Ramps/ Signal AM 17.5 B 17.5 B 0.0 No Foothill Boulevard PM 20.1 C 20.3 C 0.2 No 3 Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Signal AM 38.1 D 38.4 D 0.3 No Boulevard PM 38.6 D 38.2 D -0.4 No 4 East Avenue/Foothill Signal AM 12.9 B 13.4 B 0.5 No Boulevard PM 8.0 A 8.6 A 0.6 No 5 East Avenue/Project OWSC AM - 11.1 B N/A Driveway' PM - 10.2 B N/A 6 East Avenue/Project TWSC AM 11.6 B 12.6 B 1.0 No Driveway(Marshall Court) PM 10.2 B 10.8 B 0.6 No 7 East Avenue/Miller Signal AM 28.0 C 29.1 D 1.1 No Avenue PM 24.2 C 26.1 D 1.9 No Source:Westbury Transportation Impact Study(Fehr&Peers 2020). Delay is reported in seconds. 1 Intersection becomes a TWSC intersection in the Plus Project scenario. A=change 1-15=Interstate 15 OWSC=one-way stop control LOS=level of service TWSC=two-way stop control N/A=not applicable Opening Year (2022) Plus Project Conditions. Table 4.17.E summarizes the peak-hour LOS results for Opening Year (2022) Plus Project traffic conditions at the study area intersections. As shown on this table, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS. With implementation of the Project, all study area intersections would continue to operate at acceptable LOS. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts based on the LOS standards and significance criteria under opening year conditions. Cumulative Year(2040) Plus Project Conditions.Table 4.17.F summarizes the peak-hour LOS results for the Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project traffic conditions at the study area intersections. As shown on this table, all study area intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable LOS. With implementation of the Project, all study area intersections would continue to operate at acceptable LOS. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts based on the LOS standards and significance criteria under cumulative year conditions. P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 40 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 4.17.E: Opening Year (2022) Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary Opening Year Peak Opening Year Plus Project Significant Impact? Intersection Control Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS A Delay Yes/No 1 1-15 Southbound Ramps/ Signal AM 11.0 B 11.0 B 0.0 No Foothill Boulevard PM 12.9 B 13.1 B 0.2 No 2 1-15 Northbound Ramps/ Signal AM 18.8 B 18.9 B 0.1 No Foothill Boulevard PM 15.4 B 15.5 B 0.1 No 3 Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Signal AM 42.1 D 42.7 D 0.6 No Boulevard PM 40.6 D 41.5 D 0.9 No 4 East Avenue/Foothill Signal AM 15.1 B 16.0 B 0.9 No Boulevard PM 8.2 A 8.8 A 0.6 No 5 East Avenue/Project OWSC AM - 10.4 B N/A Driveway' PM - 10.2 B N/A 6 East Avenue/Project TWSC AM 11.7 B 11.8 B 0.1 No Driveway(Marshall Court) PM 10.7 B 10.8 B 0.1 No 7 East Avenue/Miller Avenue Signal AM 25.0 C 25.1 C 0.1 No PM 24.8 C 25.3 C 0.5 No Source:Westbury Transportation Impact Study(Fehr&Peers,April 2020). Delay is reported in seconds. 1 Intersection becomes a TWSC intesection in the Plus Project scenario. A=change 1-15=Interstate 15 OWSC=one-way stop control LOS=level of service TWSC=two-way stop control N/A=not applicable Table 4.17.F: Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project Intersection LOS Summary Cumulative Cumulative Year Peak Year Plus Project Significant Impact? Intersection Control Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS A Delay Yes/No 1 1-15 Southbound Ramps/ Signal AM 12.4 B 12.5 B 0.1 No Foothill Boulevard PM 13.7 B 13.8 B 0.1 No 2 1-15 Northbound Ramps/ Signal AM 29.7 C 30.1 C 0.4 No Foothill Boulevard PM 15.9 B 16.0 B 0.1 No 3 Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Signal AM 40.1 D 40.3 D 0.2 No Boulevard PM 34.2 C 34.2 C 0.0 No 4 East Avenue/Foothill Signal AM 30.0 C 34.7 C 4.7 No Boulevard PM 12.2 B 14.8 B 2.6 No 5 East Avenue/Project OWSC AM - 11.3 B N/A Driveway' PM - 11.5 B N/A 6 East Avenue/Project TWSC AM 12.6 B 12.9 B 0.3 No Driveway(Marshall Court) PM 13.0 B 13.7 B 0.7 No 7 East Avenue/Miller Signal AM 26.5 C 26.6 C 0.1 No Avenue PM 30.0 C 30.5 C 0.5 No Source:Westbury Transportation Impact Study(Fehr&Peers,April 2020). Delay is reported in seconds. 1 Intersection becomes a TWSC intesection in the Plus Project scenario. A=change 1-15=Interstate 15 OWSC=one-way stop control LOS=level of service TWSC=two-way stop control N/A=not applicable 4-112 P:\STR1901-West bu ry\l nitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cx2g 66/1$/�0�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Regional access to the Project site is provided by East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. East Avenue, the main roadway serving the Project site, is a tertiary travel corridor.88 Within the City's Circulation Plan, East Avenue is a Secondary roadway. Vehicle access to the Project site would be provided via two driveways along the western side of East Avenue. The northerly of the two driveways would connect with the existing East Avenue/Marshall Court intersection. Vehicular traffic to and from the Project site would utilize the existing network of regional and local roadways that currently serve the Project area. The proposed Project includes an internal private road that would provide resident access to residential and commercial units, as well as on-site amenities. Omnitrans operates four bus lines within the vicinity of the Project site: Route 66, which travels east-west along Foothill Boulevard; Route 67, which travels east-west along Baseline Road; Route 82, which travels north-south along Milliken Avenue and along Foothill Boulevard toward Victoria Gardens; and Route 85, which travels north-south along Milliken Avenue above Foothill Boulevard. The Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station is west of Milliken Avenue. Commuter train service is provided via the San Bernardino Line to/from downtown Los Angeles (Union Station) and downtown San Bernardino. Pedestrian access to the Project site from the sidewalk on East Avenue would be provided by four entrance gates. Pedestrian access to/from the parking area would be provided by five access gates. In addition, there would be one designated pedestrian access gate to provide pedestrian access to/from the parking area and the commercial area. The proposed Project would include improvements to the public sidewalk adjacent to the Project site along East Avenue. This would include a new asphalt section, curb and gutter improvements, landscaping improvements (such as street trees),two new drive approaches, and a wrought-iron fence and/or property boundary wall. Section 17.64.100 of the City's Municipal Code establishes bicycle parking requirements. Bicycle parking is required for all new multifamily residential construction in Rancho Cucamonga at a rate of 5 percent of the required parking. In the case of a residential development, a standard garage is sufficient. As discussed in Response 4.11(b), the proposed Project would provide 134 garage parking spaces. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with adopted plans, programs, ordinances, or policies regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. The City's General Plan Community Mobility Element (2010) sets forth the plan for all means of mobility in Rancho Cucamonga. The Community Mobility Element outlines specific goals and policies promoting an integrated and balanced multimodal transportation network of Complete Streets and the requirement that new development mitigate transportation impacts and improve the City's transportation system. The proposed Project would be required to be consistent with the goals and policies outlined in the Community Mobility Element. The proposed Project would be required to adhere to all regulations outlined in the City's Municipal Code. Chapter 12, Streets, Sidewalks and Public Places, of the City's Municipal Code serves as the traffic ordinance for Rancho Cucamonga and therefore establishes specific legal and organizational authority for traffic management and regulatory enforcement of use within the public right-of-way. 88 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010b.General Plan. Chapter 3:Community Mobility. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 40 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Section 12.20.080 establishes performance measures and implementation within the City's Complete Streets program. Chapter 17.78 of the City's Municipal Code, Transportation Demand Management, does not outline any requirements that apply to residential uses. The 2016 San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP) defines a network of State highways and arterials, level of service standards and related procedures, and a process for mitigation of impacts of new development on the existing transportation system.89 The Congestion Management Program incorporated the goals and policies of the 2016-2040 SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Appendix B of the 2016 CMP provides criteria for projects not requiring additional analysis of traffic impacts to CMP-monitored facilities. The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) has established thresholds for requiring analysis of potential impacts to CMP facilities. Any project meeting the CMP threshold of 250 two-way peak-hour trips that expects to add at least 50 people-hour trips to a State highway facility is required to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis for Caltrans' review. If a project is forecasted to generate 100 to 250 peak-hour trips and expects to add at least 50 people-hour trips to a State highway facility, the jurisdiction should consult with Caltrans to determine the need for a Traffic Impact Analysis report. According to Table 3 in the Traffic Impact Analysis, Project Trip Generation Estimates, the Project generates fewer than 100 peak-hour trips and is therefore below the established threshold for requiring a CMP analysis. Because the trip generation is below the threshold established for analyzing potential impacts to CMP facilities, the impacts to CMP facilities are less than significant. The proposed Project would be required to adhere to policies in the City's General Plan Community Mobility Element, as well as regulations outlined in the City's Municipal Code. According to the intersection analyses of Existing Plus Project, Opening Year (2022) Plus Project, and Cumulative Year (2040) Plus Project conditions, there would be no significant impacts with regard to LOS. Project- related traffic volumes would not cause any study area intersection to degrade from acceptable LOS to unacceptable LOS. In addition, the Project does not meet the established threshold for analyzing CMP facilities because it generates fewer than 100 peak-hour trips. Further, final design of the proposed Project would be subject to review by the Traffic Engineer, or designee, at the City's Department of Public Works. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact related to conflicts with an applicable plan, program, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. No mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. S9 San Bernardino Associated Governments. 2016.San Bernardino Congestion Management Program. 4-114 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/ifiQZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines§15064.3,subdivision (b)? According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(a), project-related transportation impacts are generally best measured by evaluating the project's VMT. VMT refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) sets forth criteria for analyzing transportation impacts, breaking down the methodology based on project type and specifying other criteria for conducting VMT analysis. For land use projects, VMT exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact. Generally, projects located within 0.5 mi of an existing high-quality transit corridor should be considered to have a less than significant impact. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(2) addresses VMT associated with transportation projects and states that projects that reduce VMT, such as pedestrian, bicycle, and transit projects, should be presumed to have a less than significant impact. Subdivision (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.3, acknowledges that Lead Agencies may not be able to quantitatively estimate VMT for every project type; in these cases, a qualitative analysis may be used. The regulation goes on to state that Lead Agencies have the discretion to formulate a methodology that would appropriately analyze a project's VMT. (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b)(4)). It is important to note that State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(c) states that while an agency may elect to be governed by the provisions of this section immediately, it is not required until July 1, 2020. The Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (OPR 2018) identifies four potential screening thresholds for determining that residential development would likely have a less than significant impact on VMT. These screening criteria are: (1) the project would generate fewer than 110 daily trips, (2)the project is located in a low-VMT-generating area, (3)the project is located within 0.5 mi of a major transit stop,90 or (4) the project provides 100 percent affordable housing. According to the Westbury Transportation Impact Study, the proposed Project would generate over 1,000 daily trips. San Bernardino County has a higher VMT than the regional average; therefore, the Project site is not located in a low-VMT-generating area. The proposed Project is located within 0.5 mile of Omnitrans Bus Route 66 (Fontana—Foothill Boulevard—Montclair). However, the bus lines on this route operate every 30 minutes and therefore do not meet the screening threshold for a Project's proximity to transit operating every 15 minutes or more frequently. The proposed Project would not provide 100 percent affordable housing. Therefore, the proposed Project does not meet any of these potential screening thresholds. 90 Transit proximity is defined as a project located within 0.5 mi of rail transit or the intersection of two or more bus routes with service every 15 minutes(or more frequently)during peak commute periods. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 40 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 CalEEMod is a model used statewide to estimate pollutant and GHG emissions for various aspects of construction and operation of a proposed Project. The Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (OPR 2018) identifies models (and CalEEMod specifically) as potential tools for analyzing a project's VMT. The air quality analysis used the trip generation identified in Table 4.17.G to analyze the emissions produced by vehicles traveling to/from the Project. As the site is currently vacant, no VMT are generated by the site in the existing conditions. Table 4.17.G provides a comparison of VMT. Table 4.17.G: Project Effect on Vehicle Miles Traveled Annual VMT Existing Use 0 Proposed Development 3,421,274 Net Change 3,421,274 VMT=vehicle miles traveled At this time, the City has not established a methodology that would appropriately analyze VMT impacts within its jurisdiction. In addition, the City does not currently have thresholds or standards in place for assessing potential VMT impacts. Therefore, this information is provided for disclosure purposes only, and traffic impacts in this IS/MND are based on the City's level-of-service thresholds. Significance Determination: Inapplicable. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? Vehicular traffic to and from the Project site would utilize the existing network of regional and local roadways that serve the Project area. Access to the Project site would be provided via two new full- access driveways. One of the driveways would connect to the existing East Avenue/Marshall Court intersection. As discussed in Response 4.17(a), the intersections at both Project driveways would operate at acceptable LOS B during both peak hours for all scenarios. The proposed Project includes an internal private road that would provide resident access to residential and commercial units. The Conceptual Fire Access Site Plan verifies the internal circulation system's ability to provide adequate fire engine access and turning radius throughout the entire community. The design of the proposed Project, including the internal private roadway, ingress, egress, and other streetscape changes, would be subject to review by the City's Department of Public Works. The proposed Project does not introduce any incompatible uses into the Project vicinity. Therefore,the proposed Project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., a sharp curve or dangerous intersection) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment), and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 4-116 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx u06/1$/ QZ> age 4 (J INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Construction. The proposed Project would require temporary lane closures on East Avenue to facilitate utility connections and construction of the sideway adjacent to the Project boundary. Temporary lane closures would be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual. Among other things, the manual recommends early coordination with affected agencies to ensure that emergency vehicle access is maintained. In this manner, officials could plan and respond appropriately in the event emergency vehicles would be required to access East Avenue. In addition, as described in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, the Project Applicant/Developer would be required to prepare and implement a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan, which would be subject to the approval of the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works, or designee. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan would require certain conditions (e.g., providing warning signs, lights, and devices) and would require that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or roadway work. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, impacts to emergency access during construction would be reduced to a less than significant level. No additional mitigation is required. Operation. Emergency access to the Project site would be provided by two driveways connecting to East Avenue on the eastern boundary of the Project site and internal roads providing circulation within the Project site. As specified in Regulatory Compliance Measure (RCM) TR-1, access to/from the site must be designed to City standards and would be subject to review by the RCFPD and the SBSD for compliance with fire and emergency access standards and requirements. Project conformance with City standards and RCFPD and SBSD emergency access standards and requirements would ensure that the on-site circulation system, including both driveways, would be approriately designed and sized to accommodate the maximum turning radius of RCFPD and SBSD emergency response vehicles. Therefore, approval of the Project plans would ensure that the proposed Project's impacts related to emergency access would be less than significant with implementation of RCM TR-1. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant. Regulatory Compliance Measures and Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project would be required to adhere to all applicable City, RCFPD, and SBSD standards for appropriate emergency access as described in RCM-TR-1. RCM-TR-1 Emergency Access Standards. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall submit Final Circulation Design and Emergency Access Plans for review and approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD), and the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department (SBSD). The plans shall comply with all applicable City, RCFPD, and SBSD standards for appropriate emergency access. The plans shall address all aspects of ingress to and egress from the Project site and the on-site circulation system, including the width of all Project driveways and on-site roadways to ensure that the minimum acceptable turning radius required to accommodate emergency response vehicles is provided, and shall PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 41 1-117 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 identify the location of all access gates, Knox boxes, and fire suppression facilities. In accordance with City, RCFPD, and SBSD standards, the Final Circulation Design and Emergency Access Plan shall show evidence that all Project access points and the on-site circulation system are designed in accordance with all applicable emergency access standards to ensure adequate emergency responder accessibility to the Project site. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact. 4-118 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cx<<06/1�/ QZ> age 4 1 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe,and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical ❑ ❑ ❑ resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?Or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence,to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1?In applying ❑ ® ❑ ❑ the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Impact Analysis a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?Or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1,the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. The following responses address Thresholds 4.18(a)(i) and 4.18(a)(ii). Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014 (i.e., AB 52), requires that Lead Agencies evaluate a project's potential to impact "tribal cultural resources." Such resources include sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register or included in a local register of historical P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 4A-119 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 resources (PRC Section 21074). AB 52 also gives Lead Agencies the discretion to determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a resource falling outside of the definition stated above nonetheless qualifies as a "tribal cultural resource." Also, per AB 52 (specifically, PRC 21080.3.1), a CEQA Lead Agency must consult with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed Project and have previously requested that the Lead Agency provide the tribe with notice of such projects. On December 16, 2019, the City sent letters for the purpose of AB 52 consultation to the following tribes: • Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh • Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Nationa • Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of • San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Mission Indians • Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians • Morongo Band of Mission Indians The letters (provided in Appendix L of this IS/MND) provided each tribe with the opportunity to request consultation with the City regarding the project. In compliance with AB 52, tribes had 30 days from the date of receipt of notification to request, in writing, consultation on the project. Information provided through tribal consultation will inform the assessment as to whether the tribes believe any tribal cultural resources are present on the project site. Two responses were received in response to the City's AB 52 letters. On January 10, 2020, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians e-mailed City staff to discuss the project. Jessica Mauck, Cultural Resources Analyst for the tribe, stated that the tribe does not have any concerns with the project's implementation as planned. The e-mail from Ms. Mauck also included the tribe's suggested cultural resource and tribal cultural resource mitigation for the City to consider. These suggestions were incorporated into Mitigation Measures TRC-1 and TRC-2. In January 2020, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation provided a letter to the City stating that the tribe is the direct lineal descendant of the project area. The letter provided the tribe's suggested cultural resource and tribal cultural resource mitigation measures for the City to consider. These suggestions were incorporated into Mitigation Measures TRC-1 and TRC-2. As discussed in Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, the property does not contain any buildings or structures that meet any California Register criteria or qualify as "historical resources" as defined by CEQA. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines or PRC Section 5020.1(k). As discussed in Section 4.5, the Project site has been included in previous cultural resource studies and contains no previously recorded prehistoric or historic resources. On November 26, 2017, LSA archaeologist Gini Austerman conducted a pedestrian survey of the Project site. The survey did not 4-120 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx u06/1$/ Ol> age 4 4 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J identify any cultural or archaeological resources in the Project area and concluded that there is little potential for the proposed Project to impact prehistoric resources. In the unlikely event archaeological resources are discovered at any time during construction, those activities would be halted in the vicinity of the find until it can be assessed for significance by a qualified archaeologist (see Mitigation Measure CUL-1 in Section 4.5). Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered archaeological resources to a less than significant level. The City is recommending the inclusion of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 to protect any potentially unknown tribal cultural resources on the Project site. In the unlikely event that ground- disturbing construction activities uncover a yet-to-be-discovered tribal cultural resource, implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources to a less than significant level. No additional mitigation is required. Therefore, with the implementation of mitigation, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to tribal cultural resources, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: TCR-1 Native American Monitoring. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall confirm that a qualified Native American monitor has been contacted and will be allowed access to the project site to provide Native American monitoring services during ground-disturbing project construction activities. The Native American monitor shall be selected by the City from the list of certified Native American monitors maintained by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation.-The selected Native American monitor(s) shall be invited to the pre-grading conference to establish procedures for tribal cultural resource surveillance. Monitoring procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work and creating a 50-foot buffer zone area to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the Native American monitor(s) to be tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21074. Construction activities can continue outside of this buffer zone area. These monitoring procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, prior to commencement of any surface disturbance on the project site. The Native American monitor(s) shall complete monitoring logs on a daily basis that provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The Native American monitor(s) shall also provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, meeting or exceeding requirements specified by the Applicant. The on-site monitoring shall cease when project grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 41 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 tribal representatives and monitor(s) have indicated that the site has a low potential for tribal cultural resources. TCR-2 Previously Unknown Tribal Cultural Resources. Prior to commencement of grading activities, the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans include requirements specifying that if tribal cultural resources are discovered during excavation, grading, or construction activities, work shall cease within 50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist (who meets Secretary of the Interior Standards) has evaluated the find in accordance with federal, State, and local guidelines to determine whether the find constitutes a "unique archaeological resource" as defined in Section 21083.2(g) of the California Public Resources Code (PRC). If the find is determined to be a unique archaeological resource, the found deposits shall be treated in accordance with federal, State, and local guidelines, including, but not limited to, those set forth in PRC Section 21083.2. Any finds dating to the pre- contact period shall be also assessed by a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (who have requested to be given the opportunity to provide input with regards to significance and treatment of pre-contact finds) and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to determine whether the find constitutes a "tribal cultural resource" as defined in PRC Section 21074. If the find is determined to be a tribal cultural resource, a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation shall coordinate the treatment and curation of these resources with the Project Applicant/Developer and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA, a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan (Plan) shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan.This Plan shall allow for a Native American monitor from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation to continue to be present and for a Native American monitor from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians to be present for the remainder of the Project, should the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians elect to place a monitor on-site. Construction personnel of the proposed Project shall not collect or move any archaeological or tribal cultural resources and associated materials. Construction activity may continue unimpeded on other portions of the Project site during assessment and treatment of tribal cultural resources. Any and all archaeological/cultural documents and records created as part of the Project shall be supplied to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for dissemination to the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall, in good faith, consult with the two tribes throughout the life of the Project. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. 4-122 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx u06/1$/ age 4 (j INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage,electric power,natural gas,or telecommunications ❑ ❑ ® ❑ facilities,the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ normal,dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards,or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and El El ® El statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Impact Analysis a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Water. Delivery of domestic water service in Rancho Cucamonga is provided by CVWD. CVWD provides water and wastewater services to approximately 190,000 people across 47 square miles. The CVWD service area includes 48,000 water connections and 37,000 sewer connections, with an average daily demand of 47 million gallons per day (mgd).91 The Project is within CVWD's service area. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), CVWD's three main sources of water include (1) groundwater, (2) local canyon runoff (surface and subsurface flows), and (3) imported surface water delivered through the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. From 2006 to 2015, CVWD's total water supply was approximately 46.6 percent imported water, 45.3 percent groundwater, 6.5 percent canyon water, and 1.6 percent recycled water.92 Water demand associated with the proposed Project would be typical of residential water usage in Rancho Cucamonga. Long-term demand for water would occur during operation of the proposed Project. In its existing condition,there are no uses on the Project site that have a daily potable water demand. 91 Cucamonga Valley Water District.2018.About Us. 92 Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD).2015 Urban Water Management Plan. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 41 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 CVWD has determined it is able to meet the current and projected full-service demands of its customers under all hydrologic conditions through 2035. In normal and single dry years, the district's groundwater supply is not anticipated to be affected. In multiple dry years, CVWD's surface water supplies are expected to be reduced. To meet demand, the difference from reduced canyon flows and imported water would be made up from CVWD's stored groundwater from the Chino Basin and implementation of its water shortage contingency plan.93 Table 4.19.A shows the supply and demand forecasts for the multiple dry year scenario. Table 4.19.A: Water Supply and Demand Projections Comparison— Multiple Dry Year Third-Year Supply (2020-2035) Year Water Supply(AFY) Water Demand Difference 2020 60,500 60,500 0 2025 63,100 63,100 0 2030 65,700 65,700 0 2035 65,700 65,700 0 Source:Cucamonga Valley Water District,Urban Water Management Plan,Table 47(2015). AFY=acre-feet per year. CVWD's water demands over the years 2015-2035 are based on the 2013 Water Supply Master Plan. For years 2020 through 2035, demand is escalated proportionally with population growth projections, which CVWD estimates by using the current population density and the remaining buildable area in its service area.94 According to the City's General Plan, Rancho Cucamonga will be fully built out by 2030 and therefore will not experience an increase in total population between 2030 and 2035.95 Based on the reliability of CVWD's supply and the surplus in water availability in past years, CVWD would be able to meet regional water demand under the multiple dry year hydrology condition. The proposed Project is anticipated to demand approximately 38,907 gallons per day (gpd) of water.96 Although the proposed Project would result in an increase in water usage,the total amount of anticipated water usage by the Project represents approximately 0.1 percent of the water in CVWD's service area in 2015.97 Consequently, the anticipated water demand of the proposed Project would be negligible compared to CVWD's water supply. In addition, as stated previously, CVWD has adequate water supply to meet demand during the single dry year and multiple dry year scenarios. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not require or result in the 93 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015. Urban Water Management Plan. Website: https://www. cvwdwater.com/DocumentCenter/View/1955/2015-Urban-Water-Management-Plan---CVWD?bidld= (accessed June 14, 2019). 94 Ibid. 95 Ibid. 96 For residential uses, water use was estimated to be 110 percent of wastewater generation. As discussed below,the project would generate 35,370 gpd of wastewater.35,370 gpd * 1.1=38,907 gpd. 97 According to the UWMP, the 2015 Actual Volume was 42,679 acre-feet. 38,907 gpd _ 24,679 acre-feet = 0.001 or 0.1 percent. 4-124 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx u06/1$/ QZ> age 4 tj INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J relocation or construction of new or expanded water treatment facilities, and no mitigation would be required. As is required of all new development in California, the proposed Project would comply with California State law regarding water conservation measures, including pertinent provisions of Title 24 of the California Government Code regarding the use of water-efficient appliances and low-flow plumbing fixtures. Additionally, the Project would comply with the City of the Rancho Cucamonga State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.82.020) (refer to RCM-UTL-1), which requires the submittal of a Landscaping Plan illustrating compliance with the provisions of the City's landscaping guidelines. Approval of the Landscaping Plan would ensure that landscaping included as part of the Project would not result in a water demand that would adversely affect the City's existing water supply. Therefore, the increased water demand resulting from the Project is anticipated to be minimal and would be within the existing service capacity of CVWD. As such, the proposed Project would not necessitate new or expanded water entitlements, and CVWD would be able to accommodate the increased demand for potable water. Therefore, Project impacts associated with an increase in potable water demand are considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Regulatory Compliance Measure: RCM-UTL-1 Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Director of Planning, or designee, shall confirm that the Final Landscaping Plan for the proposed Project is consistent with all applicable provisions outlined in the City's Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. Wastewater. CVWD provides water and wastewater services to approximately 190,000 people across 47 square miles. CVWD service area includes 48,000 water connections and 37,000 sewer connections, with an average daily demand of 47 mgd.98 The Project is within CVWD's service area. Wastewater generated by the Project would be delivered to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) RP-4 treatment plant. The IEUA is a regional wastewater treatment agency responsible for serving 875,000 people across 242 square miles in San Bernardino County. The PD-4 treatment plant currently has an available capacity of 4.5 mgd.99 The proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately 35,370 gpd of wastewater.100 The total amount of wastewater generated by the proposed Project represents approximately 0.8 percent of the daily remaining treatment capacity at RP-4, which would treat wastewater from the Project site.101 Consequently, the increase in wastewater generated by the proposed Project would be negligible 11 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2018. About Us. Website: https://www.cvwdwater.com/35/About-Us (accessed June 12, 2019). 99 Written correspondence with Kenneth Tam,Senior Associate Engineer, IEUA.June 13, 2019. 100 According to the IEUA, the daily flow for one residential household is 270 gpd. 270 gpd * 131 units = 35,370 gpd. 101 35,370 gpd-4.5 mgd =0.00786 or 0.8 percent. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 41 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 (less than 1 percent) compared to the available wastewater treatment capacity of PD-4. Implementation of the proposed Project would not create a need to expand existing wastewater facilities. Development of the proposed Project would not require, nor would it result in, the construction or relocation of new or expanded wastewater treatment or collection facilities other than those facilities to connect to existing infrastructure in East Avenue. Therefore, Project impacts related to the construction of wastewater treatment or collection facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Stormwater Drainage Facilities. As shown on Figure 2.8, Utility Plan, Project improvements would include the addition of an on-site storm drain that would run south and connect to the existing storm drain system in East Avenue. Implementation of the proposed Project would increase the impervious surface area on the Project site by 5 ac, which would increase stormwater runoff from the Project site. As specified in Compliance Measure RCM-WQ-3, a Final Hydrology Study would be approved by the City and would demonstrate that the on-site drainage facilities are designed and adequately sized to convey and reduce runoff such that on-site and off-site drainage facility capacity would not be exceeded during a design storm. With implementation of RCM-WQ-3, the proposed Project would not exceed the capacity of downstream stormwater drainage facilities or cause the expansion of existing facilities. Additionally, the proposed Project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or the expansion of existing facilities beyond the improvements included as part of the proposed Project. Therefore, impacts to stormwater drainage facilities would be less than significant with the incorporation of RCM-WQ-3. Electric Power. Refer to Section 4.6, Energy, for further discussion related to the Project's impacts with respect to existing and projected supplies of electricity. As discussed further in Section 4.6, the Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. No mitigation would be required. Natural Gas. The Project does not include any utility improvements related to natural gas. Therefore, the Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded natural gas facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. No mitigation would be required. Telecommunications. Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would not increase the demand for telecommunications facilities. In addition, the proposed Project would not involve the construction or relocation of new or expanded telecommunications facilities. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the Project is anticipated to result in a population increase of approximately 404 people; the increase in population resulting from the proposed Project comprises less than 1 percent of the total population of Rancho Cucamonga and does not represent a substantial increase in population. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to the construction or relocation of existing telecommunications facilities, and no mitigation would be required. Summary. The proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded facilities for water, wastewater treatment, storm drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications. Existing facilities have the capacity to serve the anticipated uses, and 4-126 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1$/ QZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J the Project would not substantially increase demand upon these facilities as compared to historic and existing conditions at the Project site. Therefore, impacts to these utility facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? As previously stated in Response 4.19(a), above, the Project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Taking projected population growth into account, CVWD anticipates a surplus in water supply for the years 2020, 2025, 2030, and 2035.102 As stated previously, the proposed Project is anticipated to use approximately 38,907 gpd of water. Further, the total amount of anticipated water usage by the Project represents approximately 0.1 percent of the water in CVWD's service area in 2015. Therefore, water demand from the proposed Project would be within CVWD's current and projected water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Impacts related to water supplies would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Refer to Response 4.19(a). Although the proposed Project would increase wastewater demand on site, the increased wastewater flows from the proposed Project could be accommodated within the existing design capacity of the IEUA RP-4 treatment plant that would serve the Project site.The IEUA confirmed that the proposed Project would not create a need to expand existing IEUA facilities.l°s Therefore, the IEUA would have adequate capacity to serve the Project's projected demand in addition to its existing commitments. Therefore, impacts related to wastewater treatment are less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 102 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015. Urban Water Management Plan. Website: https://www.cvwd water.com/DocumentCenter/View/1955/2015-Urban-Water-Management-Plan---CVWD?bidld= (accessed June 14, 2019). 10' Written correspondence with Kenneth Tam,Senior Associate Engineer, IEUA.June 13, 2019. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 21-127 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Solid waste collection and transport in Rancho Cucamonga is handled by contracted private firms that haul collected materials to regional landfills and materials recycling facilities.104 The Project site would be served by Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. (Burrtec). Burrtec uses a three-bin system for recycling and waste disposal. Solid waste collected from the Project site would be anticipated to be hauled to Burrtec's West Valley Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) in Fontana. Solid waste that is not diverted is primarily disposed at the Mid-Valley Landfill, a municipal landfill located in Rialto. The Mid-Valley Landfill has a daily permitted capacity of 7,500 tons per day(tpd), a remaining capacity of 67,520,000 cubic yards, and an anticipated close date of 2033.1os On average, 3,474 tons are disposed daily.106 On average,the landfill has a remaining daily disposal capacity of 4,026 tons. As described further in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project includes the construction of 131 residential units and 4 commercial-ready units that would result in an increase of approximately 404 residents on the Project site. The proposed Project would generate approximately 0.8 tpd of solid waste during Project operation.107 As stated previously, the Mid- Valley Landfill has the capacity to process an additional 4,026 tpd of waste.The incremental increase of solid waste generated by the proposed Project would constitute approximately 0.02 percent of the remaining daily available capacity(4,026 tpd) at the Mid-Valley Landfill. Furthermore, 57 percent of the solid waste produced daily in Rancho Cucamonga is diverted from landfills through recycling and reuse.108 As such, solid waste generated by the proposed Project would not cause the capacity of the Mid-Valley Landfill to be exceeded. The proposed Project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure. Moreover, the Project would not impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Therefore, the Project would result in a less than significant impact to solid waste and landfill facilities, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 104 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010f. General Plan Program EIR. Chapter 4.17: Utilities and Service Systems. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BloblD=7611(accessed June 13, 2019). 1os County of San Bernardino. 2019. San Bernardino Countywide Plan Draft EIR. Website: http://countywideplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Ch_05-18-USS.pdf(accessed June 17, 2019). 106 Ibid. 107 131 residential units * 12.23 pounds per dwelling unit per day (generation rate obtained from CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation and Disposal) => 1,602.13 pounds per day, the equivalent of 0.80106 ton. 108 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010j. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Element. 4-128 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1$/ � INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) changed the focus of solid waste management from landfill to diversion strategies (e.g., source reduction, recycling, and composting). The purpose of the diversion strategies is to reduce dependence on landfills for solid waste disposal. AB 939 established mandatory diversion goals of 25 percent by 1995 and 50 percent by 2000. AB 341 (2011) amended the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 to include a provision declaring that it is the policy goal of the State that not less than 75 percent of solid waste generated be source-reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020 and annually thereafter. In addition, AB 341 required the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to develop strategies to achieve the State's policy goal. CalRecycle has conducted multiple workshops and published documents that identify priority strategies to assist the State in reaching the 75 percent goal by 2020. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan (2017), future solid waste reduction strategies include enhanced construction waste diversion, improved recycling opportunities (including composting), and reduced food waste. Although these strategies are aimed at improving the City's environmental sustainability overall, they may also improve the City's total waste diversion rate. In addition, the proposed Project would be required to comply with all federal, State, and local regulations related to solid waste. Furthermore, the proposed Project would comply with all standards related to solid waste diversion, reduction, and recycling during Project construction and operation. Therefore, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in less than significant impacts related to potential conflicts with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations pertaining to solid waste, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 42 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 4.20 WILDFIRE Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds,and other factors,exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of runoff,post-fire slope instability,or drainage changes? Impact Analysis a) Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Refer to the response to Response 4.9(f). As described in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, the Project Applicant/Developer would be required to prepare and implement a Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan, which would be subject to the approval of the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works, or designee. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan would require certain conditions (e.g., providing warning signs, lights, and devices) and would require that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or roadway work. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1, potential impacts to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed Project would be reduced to a less than significant level. The Project would be developed in accordance with City emergency access standards. Access to and from the Project site for emergency vehicles would be reviewed and approved by RCFPD and the City as part of the project approval process to ensure the proposed Project is compliant with all applicable codes and ordinances for emergency vehicle access. Compliance with existing codes and ordinances would ensure that potential impacts related to emergency response and evacuation plans associated with construction of the proposed Project would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. 4-130 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cx2g 66/1$/ Ol> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. b) Would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Topography influences the movement of air, thereby directing a fire's course. Where slope increases, the rate of spread of a wildland fire also increases. The Project site is located in a developed portion of Rancho Cucamonga. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, the Project site and surrounding area have a slope of less than 10 percent. The San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino Forest to the north and northeast feature steep mountains that contain slopes exceeding 30 percent.The area downslope from the mountains is predominantly developed and nonvegetated, but there are pockets of fuel and grass regrowth from the 2003 wildfires that contribute to a high fire risk hazard in Rancho Cucamonga.10'Additionally, windstorms are considered a chronic hazard for the City of Rancho Cucamonga."" Wind events magnify the risk of wildfire and have the potential to expose inhabitants of Rancho Cucamonga to elevated pollutant concentrations and the uncontrolled spread of wildfire from VHFHSZs to the north of the Project site in the foothills of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains. The proposed Project would introduce new development and a permanent population in an undeveloped area that does not currently contain any permanent residents. In its existing condition, the Project site is relatively flat and there are no significant slopes adjacent to the site. In accordance with the California Fire Code, the RCFPD's Board of Directors has adopted a map designating the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area within Rancho Cucamonga. The designated area is inclusive of the designated High and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the State Responsibility Area that is within the jurisdictional boundaries of the RCFPD. The designated area also includes areas within Rancho Cucamonga that have been identified as fire hazard severity zones by CAL FIRE (also known as Local Responsibility Area fire hazard severity zones).The designated area also includes portions of Rancho Cucamonga that have been identified by the RCFPD as having a high wildfire hazard or risk based on wildland fire history. The Project site is identified as a VHFHSZ on the RCFPD map. The proposed Project involves the development a 131-unit residential development, which would reduce the amount of vegetation/combustible materials on site compared to existing conditions. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in a population increase of approximately 404 people. Adjacent roadways that surround the Project site (such as Miller Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard) would serve as fire breaks in the unlikely event of the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. Additionally, 1-15 separates the Project site from other VHFHSZ areas to the east and north. It is expected that 1-15 would also serve 109 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. 110 Ibid. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 42 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 as an effective firebreak in the unlikely event that a wildfire enters the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area to the east and north of the Project site via the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains. The RCFPD strives to reduce the risk of wildfire through the Weed Abatement Program, which targets specific hazard areas that face an increased danger of wildfire."' The RCFPD conducts a spring and fall inspection to ensure that weeds, dead trees, invasive grasses, tumbleweeds, and other vegetation debris are removed or maintained in accordance with Section 8.46.040 of the City's Municipal Code. In 2017, the RCFPD adopted Standard 49-1 to establish and detail local regulations for the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area as allowed by the California Fire Code, the State Fire Marshal, and the laws and regulations of the State of California. Among other things, Standard 49-1 requires the establishment of fuel modification zones, the development of a fire protection plan for the Project site, and a comprehensive landscaping plan showing the vegetation management zones and the exact locations proposed for all plants, shrubs, trees, and native vegetation. RCM-FIRE-1 requires the proposed Project to comply with RCFPD Standard 49-1. Adherence to the California Fire Code, the City's Municipal Code, and RCFPD Standard 49-1 would reduce the chance of structure ignition on the Project site in the unlikely event of a wildfire. Furthermore, the proposed Project would result in clearing, grading, paving, and revegetation of 3.45 ac according to RCFPD requirements, resulting in the decreased availability of easily combustible materials (i.e., existing eucalyptus trees) on the Project site. A portion of the Project site is encumbered by a Southern California Gas Company utility easement. The surface of this area is paved with concrete and does not contain the combustible materials necessary to contribute to the start or spread of a wildfire. In summary, the Project site is located within a VHFHSZ but would adhere to the requirements of RCFPD Standard 49-1. As such, the Project itself would not exacerbate wildfire risks as compared to existing conditions because it is representative of existing development in the area. Impacts of downwind pollutant concentrations to occupants as a result of the Project would be negligible. Therefore, due to slope, prevailing winds, location, or other factors, the proposed Project would not exacerbate wildfire risks. No mitigation is required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required, but the proposed Project is required to comply with RCFPD Standard 49-1. RCM-FIRE-1: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standard 49-1. The Project shall adhere to the requirements of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) Standard 49-1. The fire protection plan shall be approved by RCFPD and recorded on the parcel prior to the issuance of any construction permits. In addition, Vegetation 111 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/ civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?Blob ID=5780(accessed May 29, 2019). 4-132 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1$/ 0�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Management Zone 1 Fuel Modification is required to be completed before construction with combustible materials will be approved. The required fuel modification is required to be maintained for the duration of the construction. c) Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Utility and infrastructure improvements included as part of the Project are described in Section 2.0, Project Description. The proposed Project would require connections to existing off-site infrastructure systems, including connections to off-site water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater drains. With the exception of stormwater drains, all utility installations would connect to existing infrastructure on East Avenue. Although the proposed Project would include internal on-site roadways, the Project does not include any changes to public or private roadways that would exacerbate fire risk or that would result in impacts to the environment. Proposed utility improvements would be located underground and would not exacerbate fire risk. Project design and implementation of utility improvements would be reviewed and approved by the City's Public Works Department as part of the project approval process to ensure the proposed Project is compliant with all applicable fire coded, design standards, and regulations. The installation of Project-related utilities and an on-site roadway network would not exacerbate fire risk due to the Project site's location in an urban and built-out area outside of a designated fire hazard zone. Furthermore, the improved connectivity of water lines would aid in fire suppression compared to existing conditions on the Project site in the unlikely event of a wildfire. Therefore, the proposed Project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that would exacerbate fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. There would be no temporary or ongoing impact to the environment, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. d) Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Landslides. Landslides and other forms of mass wasting, including mudflows, debris flows, and soil slips, occur as soil moves downslope under the influence of gravity. Landslides are frequently triggered by intense rainfall or seismic shaking but can also occur as a result of erosion and downslope runoff caused by rain following a fire. As previously discussed in Section 4.7, Geology and Soils, Response 3.6(a)(iv), landslides or other forms of natural slope instability do not represent a significant hazard to the Project because the site is located in a relatively flat area, and there is no evidence of landslides in the Project vicinity. Additionally, the Project site does not lie within a PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 42 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 designated Landslide Hazard Zone. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, such as landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Impacts to Project occupants related to post-wildfire landslide risks would be less than significant. Flooding. According to the FEMA Flood Hazard Map, the Project site is within Zone X (Area with Reduced Flood Risk Due to Levee) of a 100-year floodplain. Zone X designates areas of moderate flood risk; these are the areas between the limits of the base flood and the 0.2 percent annual chance flood, or 500-year flood. However, as specified in Response 4.10(c)(iv), the Project site is not in a direct inundation area and is protected by a levee.11z Therefore, downslope or downstream flooding as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes are unlikely to occur. Impacts to Project occupants related to post-wildfire flooding risks would be less than significant. Significance Determination: Less than Significant. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 112 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Figure PS-5. 4-134 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1$/ QZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 4.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less than Potentially Significant with Less than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are ❑ ❑ ® ❑ considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either ❑ ® ❑ ❑ directly or indirectly? Impact Analysis a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Based on the discussion in Section 4.4, Biological Resources, the proposed Project is anticipated to result in less than significant impacts related to habitat, wildlife species, and/or plant and animal communities. With implementation of Mitigation Measure B10-1, impacts to DSF would be less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure B10-2, impacts to burrowing owls would be less than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure B10-3, impacts to Los Angeles pocket mouse and San Bernardino kangaroo rat would be less than significant. With implementation of B10-4, impacts to non-listed special-status reptiles would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not eliminate a plant or animal community, nor would it substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. As discussed in Section 4.5, Cultural Resources, Response 4.5(a), the Project site does not contain any buildings or structures that meet any of the California Register criteria or qualify as "historical resources" as defined by CEQA. Further, the Project site is not designated as a historical/archaeological landmark by the City or the County. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 42 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 As discussed in Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, the City consulted with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed Project and have previously requested that the Lead Agency provide the tribe with notice of such projects. In the unlikely event that ground-disturbing construction activities uncover a yet- to-be-discovered tribal cultural resource, implementation of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 and TCR-2 would reduce any potential impacts to previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources to a less than significant level. No additional mitigation is required. Therefore, with the implementation of mitigation, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to tribal cultural resources, and no mitigation would be required For the reasons stated above, the Project does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measures 13I0-1, 1310-2, 13I0-3, 13I0-4, CUL-1, TCR-1, and TCR-2. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? The proposed Project involves the construction of a 131-unit residential development with 4 commercial-ready units, a commercial space, and various on-site amenities. The site is currently undeveloped and vacant, but it is in an urban area surrounded by a variety of residential and commercial uses. The proposed Project would rely on and can be accommodated by the existing road system, public parks, public services, and utilities. The proposed Project would not result in or contribute to a significant biological, cultural, geological, hazard, noise, or tribal cultural impacts. Based on the Project Description and the preceding responses, impacts related to the proposed Project are less than significant or can be reduced to less than significant levels with the incorporation of mitigation measures. The proposed Project's contribution to any significant cumulative impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable. Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required. 4-136 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1$/ QZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? The proposed Project site is currently undeveloped and vacant, but it is in an urban area surrounded by a variety of residential and commercial uses. The proposed Project involves the construction of a 131-unit residential development with 4 commercial-ready units, a commercial space and various on-site amenities. The proposed Project includes a Development Code Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change the zoning classification figures from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) District. If approved, the proposed Project would be consistent with City zoning and General Plan designations for the site. Based on the Project Description and the preceding responses, development of the proposed Project would not cause substantial adverse effects to human beings because all potentially significant impacts of the proposed Project can be mitigated to a less than significant level. Significance Determination: Potentially Significant Impact. Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measures 1310-1, 1310-2, 1310-3, 1310-4, CUL-1, GEO-1, GEO-2, HAZ-1, N0I-1, N01-2,TCR-1, and TCR-2. Level of Significance after Mitigation: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 431-137 Page 432 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5.1 MITIGATION MONITORING REQUIREMENTS PRC Section 21081.6 (enacted by the passage of AB 3180) mandates that the following requirements shall apply to all reporting or mitigation monitoring programs: • The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the Project or conditions of Project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during Project implementation. For those changes that have been required or incorporated into the Project at the request of a Responsible Agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the Project, that agency shall, if so requested by the Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. • The Lead Agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. A public agency shall provide the measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment that are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of Project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other Project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or Project design. • Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft EIR or MND, a Responsible Agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the Project, shall either submit to the Lead Agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the Project, or refer the Lead Agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a Lead Agency by a Responsible Agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the Project shall be limited to measures that mitigate impacts to resources that are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit that authority of the Responsible Agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a Project, or the authority of the Lead Agency,to approve, condition, or deny Projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law. 5.2 MITIGATION MONITORING PROCEDURES The mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared in compliance with PRC Section 21081.6. The program describes the requirements and procedures to be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that all mitigation measures adopted as part of the proposed Project would be carried out as described in this IS/MND. Table 5.A lists each of the mitigation measures specified in this IS/MND and identifies the party or parties responsible for implementation and monitoring of each measure. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 5-1Page 433 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure 4.1:Aesthetics RCM-AES-1 Final Lighting and Photometric Plans.Prior to issuance of Director of the City of Prior to the issuance of a building permit,the Applicant shall submit Final Rancho Cucamonga a building permit Lighting and Photometric Plans for review and approval Planning Department, by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga(City) or designee Planning Department,or designee.The lighting and photometric plans shall be prepared by a qualified engineer(i.e.,an engineer who is an active member of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America) and shall comply with applicable standards of the City's Municipal Code.The lighting plan shall address all aspects of lighting,including infrastructure,on-site driveways, recreation,safety,signage,and promotional lighting,if any.In accordance with Municipal Code Section 17.58, Outdoor Lighting Standards,the Final Photometric Plan shall show evidence that all lighting is shielded or recessed and directed downward and away from adjoining properties and rights-of-way. 4.2:Agriculture and Forest Resources The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to agriculture.No mitigation would be required. 4.3:Air Quality The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to air quality.No mitigation would be required. 4.4:Biological Resources 13I0-1 Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly Surveys.Prior to grading Project Applicant, Prior to grading or any or any other ground-disturbing activity,a qualified with verification by other ground-disturbing biologist(i.e.,a permitted Delhi Sands flower-loving fly Director of the City of activity [DSF] biologist)shall conduct a survey for DSF habitat to Rancho Cucamonga determine if focused surveys for DSF are required.If Planning Department, focused DSF surveys are determined to be required,the or designee Project Applicant will be required to conduct focused DSF surveys in accordance with United States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)Interim General Survey Guidelines for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly(1996). USFWS protocol requires surveys to be conducted over the course of 2 consecutive years to confirm the absence of DSF.If no DSF habitat is observed on site during the pre-construction survey,a letter shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey. The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee, prior to issuance of any grading permits,and no further action is required.If DSF is observed to be present on site during the pre-construction clearance survey, consultation with the USFWS shall occur to determine the next appropriate steps.Areas currently occupied by DSF habitat shall be avoided to the extent feasible.If DSF habitat cannot be avoided,replacement of habitat at a 1:1 ratio,or as required by the USFWS,shall be implemented.Project effects to DSF must be fully 5-2 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.dopya 6/1 zQ>4 9 y_ INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure mitigated through avoidance or the replacement of habitat on or off site in coordination with the USFWS and the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee,prior to the issuance of any grading activities. BIO-2 Burrowing Owl Surveys.Prior to grading or any other Project Applicant, Prior to grading or any ground-disturbing activity,a qualified biologist shall with verification by other ground-disturbing conduct a habitat assessment for burrowing owls to Director of the City of activity determine if suitable burrowing owl habitat is present in Rancho Cucamonga and adjacent to the Project site. If suitable habitat is Planning Department, present,then focused breeding season surveys shall be or designee,and conducted consistent with the procedures outlined in CDFW Appendix D of the 2012 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation(CDFW Staff Report). Regardless of whether burrowing owls are detected during focused breeding season surveys,a pre- construction survey shall be performed by a qualified biologist no less than 14 days prior to ground-disturbing activities. If no burrowing owls are observed on site during the pre-construction clearance survey,a letter shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey.The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee,prior to issuance of any grading permits,and no further action is required. If presence of burrowing owl is determined either during the focused breeding season surveys or pre-construction surveys,the applicant shall contact CDFW prior to commencing project activities and conduct an impact assessment to determine appropriate mitigation in accordance with the CDFW Staff Report. If one or more burrowing owls are observed on site during the pre-construction clearance survey,and permanent avoidance of the owl(s)by the project is not feasible,then the occupied area shall be avoided with an appropriate setback buffer as determined by the qualified biologist until either the burrowing owl(s)can be excluded from the site(subject to CDFW approval)or the owls leave the site on their own. In accordance with the CDFW Staff Report,the size of the setback buffer should be in the range of 50 meters to 500 meters and will be determined through a combination of the extent of owl use(i.e.,nesting sites versus non-breeding use), the time of year,and the level of disturbance. If burrowing owls cannot be avoided by the proposed Project a qualified biologist shall prepare and submit a P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 5-3Page 435 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan to CDFW in accordance with Appendix E of the CDFW Staff Report for review/approval prior to the commencement of disturbance activities onsite. Burrow exclusion involves the installation of one-way doors in burrow openings during the nonbreeding season to temporarily or permanently exclude burrowing owls and to close burrows after verifying through site monitoring and scoping that the burrows are empty.Existing or artificial burrows situated less than 75 meters from the Project site are the ideal scenario for successful passive relocation.Additional factors for successful passive relocation are included in the CDFW Staff Report; however,if adjacent lands are not available then alternate mitigation will be identified. When a qualified biologist determines that burrowing owls are no longer occupying the Project site and passive relocation is complete,construction activities may continue.A final letter report shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the passive relocation.The letter shall be submitted to CDFW and the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee,prior to the issuance of any grading activities. If mitigation will include the conservation of adjacent or offsite lands for burrowing owls,then the Applicant will coordinate with CDFW and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that the permanent conservation and management of burrowing owl habitat is addressed such that the habitat acreage,number of burrows and burrowing owl impacts are replaced consistent with the CDFW Staff Report.A qualified biologist shall confirm that conservation lands contain natural unoccupied burrows at a 2:1 replacement ratio,or otherwise the biologist will construct artificial burrows for use by the owls. Monitoring and management of the replacement burrow site(s)shall be conducted and a reporting plan shall be prepared. The objective shall be to manage the replacement burrow sites for the benefit of burrowing owls(e.g.,minimizing weed cover),with the specific goal of maintaining the functionality of the burrows for a minimum of 2 years. 13I0-3: Los Angeles Pocket Mouse and San Bernardino Project Applicant, Prior to grading or any Kangaroo Rat Surveys.Prior to grading or any other with verification by other ground-disturbing ground-disturbing activity,a qualified biologist(i.e.,a Director of the City of activity permitted biologist allowed to handle the Los Angeles Rancho Cucamonga pocket mouse[LAPM]and the San Bernardino kangaroo Planning Department, rat[SBKR])shall conduct a survey to identify suitable or designee,and habitat for the LAPM and the SBKR.Should suitable CDFW and USFWS habitat be identified on the site,the qualified biologist shall conduct a minimum of 5 nights of small mammal 5-4 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.dopya 6/1 9 zQ>6 4;j INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure trapping consecutively,in accordance with protocol established by the USFWS and the CDFW. A final letter report shall be prepared by the qualified biologist documenting the results of the survey and any mitigation measures that are recommended to be implemented as part of the Project,if such measures are required.The letter shall be submitted to the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee, prior to the issuance of any grading activities. If the Los Angeles pocket mouse is identified on the site, the qualified mammal biologist shall provide an analysis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as to whether the loss of occupied habitat would"have a substantial adverse effect"on the overall species to determine whether mitigation is warranted. If mitigation is necessary to offset a potentially significant impact,then mitigation of no less than 2:1(replacement to impact)shall be required.Additionally,the Project Applicant/Developer shall prepare and implement a set of avoidance and minimization measures aimed at protecting special-status small mammals from project-related impacts.The proposed avoidance and minimization measures shall be provided to CDFW for review and approval no fewer than 30 days prior to the initiation of project activities. If the San Bernardino kangaroo rat is identified on the site,take authorization must be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS),and so the Project Applicant/Developer shall consult with the USFWS. The USFWS shall identify measures to be taken to avoid or minimize adverse Project effects to these species and their habitat.Such measures may include,but are not limited to,the following:(1)avoidance of the occupied habitat,(2)enhancement of habitat,or(3)conservation of off-site suitable habitat,or any other measures as determined by USFWS. At present the SBKR is designated as a Candidate Endangered species under the California Endangered Species Act(CESA). If the SBKR is still protected under CESA at the time of construction,then in addition to take authorization from USFWS,an Incidental Take Permit(ITP)will be required from CDFW pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2080.1. If applicable,the Project Applicant/Developer will coordinate with CDFW to obtain an ITP,including to ensure that the habitat mitigation determined through consultation with USFWS will also satisfy CDFW. P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 5-5Page 437 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure BIO-4 Non-listed Special-Status Reptiles.If construction will be Project Applicant, Prior to grading or any performed at a time of year when reptiles are active at with verification by other ground-disturbing the Project area,i.e.Spring or Summer,a qualified Director of the City of activity biologist shall visually survey the Project area prior to Rancho Cucamonga construction to identify any feature/habitats suitable to Planning Department, support special-status reptiles(i.e.,burrows,dens, or designee cavities,debris,dead vegetation,rocks,loose soil,leaf litter,etc.).Where an identifiable feature is present,the qualified biologist shall mark the potentially occupied feature for avoidance. If avoidance is infeasible,the qualified biologist shall carefully dismantle the feature and allow any individuals discovered to move out of harm's way,if such efforts are determined to be feasible and reasonable by the biologist. RCM-13I0-1 Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Fish and Game Code Project Applicant, During construction, Section 3503.In the event that construction,vegetation with verification by vegetation,clearing,or clearing,or grading activities(including disking and Director of the City of grading activities demolition)should occur between February 1 and Rancho Cucamonga occurring between September 15,the Project Applicant/Developer(or its Planning Department, February 1 and contractor)shall retain a qualified biologist(i.e.,a or designee September 15 and prior professional biologist who is familiar with local birds and to the commencement their nesting behaviors)to conduct a nesting bird survey of grading permits no more than 3 days prior to commencement of construction activities.The nesting survey shall include the Project site and areas immediately adjacent to the site that could potentially be affected by Project-related construction activities,such as noise,human activity,and dust,etc. If active nesting of birds is observed within 100 feet(ft)of the designated construction area prior to construction,the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the active nests(e.g.,as much as 500 ft for raptors and 300 ft for nonraptors[subject to the recommendations of the qualified biologist]),and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests.Prior to commencement of grading activities,the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee,shall verify that all Project grading and construction plans include specific documentation regarding the requirements stated above, that pre-construction surveys have been completed and the results reviewed by staff,and that the appropriate buffers(if needed)are noted on the plans and established in the field with orange snow fencing. RCM-BIO-2 Tree Replacement.Prior to issuance of grading permits Director of the City of Prior to the issuance of or the removal of any on-site trees,the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga grading permits Cucamonga(City)Planning Department Director,or Planning Department, designee,shall verify that the Project Applicant has or designee obtained tree removal permits in accordance with the provisions outlined in Section 17.16.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.As outlined in Section 5-6 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.doa e6/18/zQ>8 P g 4j INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure 17.16.080 of the City's Municipal Code,a tree removal permit shall by required for the removal of all heritage trees on private properties within Rancho Cucamonga, unless expressly stated in Section 17.16.080(Exceptions). 4.5:Cultural Resources CUL-1 Archaeological Monitoring.Prior to the issuance of Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the Applicant shall provide a letter to with verification by the first preliminary or the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Director of the City of precise grading permit Department,or designee,from a qualified archaeologist Rancho Cucamonga (who meets Secretary of the Interior Standards)who has Planning Department, been retained to provide archaeological monitoring or designee during ground-disturbing Project activities.The archaeologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting to establish procedures for an archaeological monitoring program.Those procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling,identification,and evaluation of resources deemed by the archaeologist to potentially be historical resources or unique archaeological resources.These procedures shall be submitted to,reviewed by,and approved by the Director of Planning,or designee, prior to issuance of the grading permit and prior to any surface disturbance on the Project site.The archaeological monitor will be present and on site during all ground- disturbing activities.Should any cultural resources be discovered,no further grading shall occur in the immediate vicinity of the discovery(precise area to be determined by the archaeologist in the field,but shall be at least 50 feet)until the Director of Planning,or designee,is satisfied that the appropriate treatment of the resource has occurred.Any finds dating to the pre- contact period shall be also assessed by a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation to determine whether the find constitutes a"tribal cultural resource"as defined in PRC Section 21074(as detailed in TRC-1).If significant pre-contact cultural resources,as defined by CEQA,are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured,the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan,the drafts of which shall be provided to the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation for review and comment,as detailed in TRC-1.An archaeological monitoring report shall be prepared following completion of archaeological monitoring,and a copy of the report shall be submitted to the South Central Coastal Information Center(SCCIC). P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 5-7Page 439 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure RCM-CUL-1 Human Remains.In the event that human remains are Project Applicant, During construction encountered on the Project site,work within 50 feet of with verification by the discovery shall be redirected and the County Coroner Director of the City of notified immediately,consistent with the requirements Rancho Cucamonga of California Code of Regulations(CCR)Section Planning Department, 15064.5(e).State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 or designee states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code(PRC) Section 5097.98.If the remains are determined to be Native American,the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC),which shall determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MILD).With the permission of the property owner,the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery.The MLD shall complete the inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site.The MLD recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials,preservation of Native American human remains and associated items in place, relinquishment of Native American human remains and associated items to the descendants for treatment,or any other culturally appropriate treatment.Consistent with CCR Section 15064.5(d),if the remains are determined to be Native American and an MILD is notified,the City shall consult with the MILD as identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for treatment and disposition of the remains.Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee,shall verify that all grading plans specify the requirements of CCR Section 15064.5(e),State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5,and PRC Section 5097.98,as stated above. 4.6:Energy The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to energy.No mitigation would be required. 4.7:Geology and Soils GEO-1 Compliance with the Recommendations in the Project Applicant During construction Geotechnical Study.All grading operations and with verification of construction shall be conducted in conformance with all City of Rancho of the recommendations included in the geotechnical Cucamonga City document prepared by Leighton and Associates,Inc., Engineer,or designee titled Geotechnical Investigation,Proposed Residential Development, West of East Avenue and Approximately 500 Feet North of Foothill Boulevard,APN 1100-191-04- 000,City of Rancho Cucamonga(October 5,2016). Recommendations found in the geotechnical document address topics including,but not limited to: Sj-g P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.dopya 6/1 9 zQ44 o INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J A Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure • General earthwork and grading,including site preparations,over-excavation and re-compaction,fill placement and compaction,importing of fill soil, shrinkage and subsidence,rippability,and oversized material; • Foundations,including minimum embedment and width,allowable bearing,lateral load resistance, increase in bearing and friction,and settlement estimates; • Slabs-on-grade,including subgrade moisture conditioning,concrete and structural design thickness, and slab underlayment for moisture vapor retarding; • Seismic design parameters; • Retaining walls; • Pavement design;and • Infiltration testing. Additional site grading,foundation,and utility plans shall be reviewed by the Project Geotechnical Consultant prior to construction to check for conformance with all of the recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation (Leighton 2016).Grading plan review shall also be conducted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga(City)City Engineer,or designee,prior to the start of grading to verify that requirements developed during the preparation of geotechnical documents have been appropriately incorporated into the Project plans.Design, grading,and construction shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the City Building Code and the California Building Code(CBC)applicable at the time of grading,as well as the recommendations of the Project Geotechnical Consultant as summarized in the final Geotechnical Report subject to review by the City Engineer,or designee,prior to the start of grading activities.The final Geotechnical Report shall present the results of observation and testing done during grading activities. GEO-2 Unknown Paleontological Resources.In the event that Project Applicant, During construction paleontological resources are encountered during Project with verification by excavation activities,work in the immediate area of the Director of the City of find shall be redirected and a paleontologist shall be Rancho Cucamonga contacted to assess the find for significance and make Planning Department, recommendations regarding further paleontological or designee mitigation as needed.If Project plans change to include excavation below a depth of 15 feet(ft),a paleontologist shall be hired to develop a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program(PRIMP)for this Project.The PRIMP shall include the methods that will be used to protect paleontological resources that may exist within the Project site,as well as procedures for monitoring, fossil preparation and identification,curation into a P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx«06/18/20» Page 441 5-9 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure repository,and preparation of a final report at the conclusion of grading.Excavation and grading activities in deposits with high paleontological sensitivity(Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits, Unit 1 below a depth of 15 ft)shall be monitored by a paleontological monitor following a PRIMP.No monitoring is required for excavation in deposits with low paleontological sensitivity(Very Young Alluvial Fan Deposits and Young Alluvial Fan Deposits,Unit 1 from the surface to a depth of 15 ft). 4.8:Greenhouse Gas Emissions The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions.No mitigation would be required. 4.9:Hazards and Hazardous Materials HAZ-1 Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan. Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of Prior to issuance of a grading permit,a Construction with verification by a grading permit Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall be prepared Director of the City of for approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga Public Works Department,or designee.The Public Works,or Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan shall designee also include the name and phone number of a contact person who can be reached 24 hours per day regarding construction traffic complaints or emergency situations. The Construction Staging and Traffic Management Plan may include,but not be limited to,the following: • Temporary lane closures shall be implemented consistent with the recommendations of the California Joint Utility Traffic Control Manual. • Flagpersons in adequate numbers shall be provided to minimize impacts to traffic flow and to ensure safe access into and out of the site. • Flagpersons shall be trained to assist in emergency response by restricting or controlling the movement of traffic that could interfere with emergency vehicle access. • All emergency access to the Project site and adjacent areas shall be kept clear and unobstructed during all phases of demolition and construction. • Safety precautions shall be provided for pedestrians and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers. • Construction-related deliveries other than concrete and earthwork-related deliveries shall be scheduled so as to reduce travel during peak travel periods(i.e., 6:00 a.m.to 9:00 a.m.and 3:30 p.m.to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday). • The construction contractor shall coordinate with other construction projects in the vicinity to minimize conflicts. • If necessary,a California Department of 5-10 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.doF'ag@8/ 0" INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure Transportation(Caltrans)transportation permit shall be obtained for use of oversized transport vehicles on Caltrans facilities. • If necessary,a traffic management plan shall be submitted to Caltrans for review and approval. • Construction vehicles,including construction personnel vehicles,shall not park on public streets, including streets outside Rancho Cucamonga. • Construction vehicles shall not stage or queue where they interfere with pedestrian and vehicular traffic or block access to nearby businesses. • If feasible,any traffic lane closures shall be limited to off-peak traffic periods,as approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Public Works. • The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours in advance of any lane closures or other roadway work. 4.10:Hydrology and Water Quality RCM-WQ-1 Construction General Permit.Prior to issuance of a Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of grading permit,the Applicant shall obtain coverage under with verification by a grading permit the State Water Resources Control Board National Director of the City of Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit Rancho Cucamonga for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Public Works,or and Land Disturbance Activities(Order No.2009-0009- designee DWQ, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System No.CAS000002,as amended by Orders No.2010-0014- DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ)(Construction General Permit).This shall include submission of Permit Registration Documents(PRDs),including a Notice of Intent(NOI)for coverage under the permit to the State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB)via the Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System(SMARTS).The Applicant shall provide the Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID)to the City of Rancho Cucamonga(City)to demonstrate proof of coverage under the Construction General Permit.A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)shall be prepared and implemented for the proposed Project in compliance with the requirements of the Construction General Permit.The SWPPP shall identify construction best management practices(BMPs)to be implemented to ensure that the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation is minimized and to control the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff as a result of construction activities.Upon completion of construction and stabilization of the site,a Notice of Termination will be submitted via SMARTS. P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 4435-11 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure RCM-WQ-2: Water Quality Management Plan.Prior to the issuance Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of of any grading or building permits,the Applicant shall with verification by grading or building submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Director of the City of permits to the City Engineer,or designee,for review and approval Rancho Cucamonga in compliance with the requirements of Section Public Works,or 19.20.260 of the City's Municipal Code and the Waste designee Discharge Requirements for the San Bernardino County Flood Control District,the County of San Bernardino,and the Incorporated Cities of San Bernardino County within the Santa Ana Region(Order No.R8-2010-0036,NPDES No.CAS618036)(San Bernardino County MS4 Permit). The Final WQMP shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of the Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans(June 2013)and the Water Quality Management Plan template,or subsequent guidance manuals.The Final WQMP shall specify the BMPs to be incorporated into the Project design to target pollutants of concern in runoff from the Project area.The City shall ensure that the BMPs specified in the Final WQMP are incorporated into the final Project design. RCM-WQ-3: Final Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis.The Applicant Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of shall submit a Final Hydrology Study to the City of Rancho with verification by grading or building Cucamonga Director of Engineering,or his/her designee, Director of the City of permits for review and approval prior to issuance of grading and Rancho Cucamonga building permits.The Final Hydrology Study shall Public Works,or demonstrate that the on-site drainage facilities are designee designed and adequately sized to convey and reduce runoff,such that on-site and off-site drainage facility capacity would not be exceeded during a design storm. 4.11:land Use and Planning The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to land use and planning.No mitigation would be required. 4.12:Mineral Resources The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to mineral resources.No mitigation would be required. 4.13:Noise N0I-1 Construction Noise and Vibration:Prior to issuance of Director of the Prior to issuance of building permits,the Director of the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga building permits Cucamonga(City)Planning Department,or designee, Planning Department, shall verify that grading and construction plans include or designee the following requirements: • If the future residential land use immediately south of the Project site is fully built and occupied at the time of Project construction,install minimum 9-foot-high temporary construction noise barriers at the Project's southern site boundary for the duration of mobile- equipment construction activities.The noise control barriers must present a solid face from top to bottom. The noise control barriers must meet the minimum 5-12 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.doua066e8 0" INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J A Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure height and be constructed as follows: o The barriers shall provide a minimum transmission loss of 20 A-weighted decibels(dBA).The noise barrier shall be constructed using an acoustical blanket(e.g.,vinyl acoustic curtains or quilted blankets)attached to the construction site perimeter fence or equivalent temporary fence posts. o The noise barrier must be maintained and any damage promptly repaired.Gaps,holes,or weaknesses in the barrier or openings between the barrier and the ground shall be promptly repaired. o The noise control barrier and associated elements shall be completely removed and the site appropriately restored upon conclusion of the construction activity. • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits,plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m.and 8:00 p.m.on weekdays,including on Saturdays,with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • During all Project site construction,the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile,with properly operating and maintained mufflers,consistent with manufacturers' standards.The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site(i.e., to the center)during all Project construction. The construction contractor shall limit haul truck deliveries to the same hours specified for construction equipment(between the hours of 7:00 a.m.and 8:00 p.m.on weekdays,including on Saturdays,with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays).The contractor shall prepare a haul route exhibit and shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck-related noise. N0I-2 Interior Noise Mitigation:To satisfy the City's 45 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level(CNEL)interior noise level criteria,units facing Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue will require a noise reduction of up to 25.5 dBA and a windows-closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation(e.g.,air conditioning).To meet P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx«06/18/20» Page 4455-13 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standards,the Project shall provide the following or equivalent noise mitigation measures: • Windows: o All windows and sliding glass doors shall be well- fitted,well-weather-stripped assemblies and shall have the following minimum sound transmission class(STC)ratings: • Windows facing East Avenue in Buildings 1,2,3, and 10 require upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of 29. ■ All other buildings require standard windows with minimum STC ratings of27. • Doors:All exterior doors shall be well-weather- stripped,solid-core assemblies at least 1.75 inches thick. • Walls:At any penetrations of exterior walls by pipes, ducts,or conduits,the space between the wall and pipes,ducts,or conduits shall be caulked or filled with mortar to form an airtightseal. • Roof: Roof sheathing of wood construction shall be well-fitted or caulked plywood of at least 0.5 inch thick. Ceilings shall be well-fitted,fully sealed gypsum board of at least 0.5 inch thick.Insulation with at least a rating of R-19 shall be used in the attic space. • Ventilation: Arrangements for any habitable room shall be such that any exterior door or window can be kept closed when the room is in use and still receive circulated air.A forced air circulation system(e.g.,air conditioning)or active ventilation system(e.g.,fresh air supply)shall be provided that satisfies the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. • Notices:Occupancy disclosure notices are recommended for all future tenants of the residential units within the Project site.The disclosure notices should state that the units may be exposed to infrequent noise events from the adjacent Cucamonga Valley Water District well site. 4.14:Population and Housing The proposed Project would not result in significant adverse impacts related to population and housing. No mitigation would be required. 4.15:Public Services RCM-PS-1 Payment of Police Impact Fee.Prior to issuance of Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of building permits,the Director of the City of Rancho with verification by building permits Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee,shall Director of the City of confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all Rancho Cucamonga required Police Impact Fees in accordance with Section Public Works,or 3.64,Police Impact Fee,of the Rancho Cucamonga designee Municipal Code. 5-14 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.doua066/e18 Z46 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure RCM-PS-2 Payment of School Development Fee. Pursuant to Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of California Education Code Section 17620(a)(1),the with verification by building permits governing board of any school district is authorized to Director of the City of levy a fee,charge,dedication,or other requirement Rancho Cucamonga against any construction within the boundaries of the Public Works,or district for the purpose of funding the construction or designee reconstruction of school facilities.Prior to issuance of building permits,the Project Applicant/Developer shall submit proof of payment of all applicable school facility development fees to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Director of Planning,or designee. RCM-PS-3 Payment of Park Impact Fee.Prior to the issuance of Project Applicant Prior to the issuance of building permits,the Director of the City of Rancho verification by building permits Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee,shall Director of the City of confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all Rancho Cucamonga required park in-lieu/park impact fees as established in Public Works,or Chapter 3.68.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal designee Code. RCM-PS-4 Payment of Library Impact Fee.Prior to the issuance of Project Applicant Prior to the issuance of building permits,the Director of the City of Rancho verification by building permits Cucamonga Planning Department,or designee,shall Director of the City of confirm that the Project Applicant/Developer has paid all Rancho Cucamonga required Library Impact Fees as established in Section Public Works,or 3.56 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. designee 4.16:Recreation RCM-REC-1 Dedication Fees.Prior to the issuance of building Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of permits,the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with verification by building permits Planning Department,or designee,shall confirm that the Director of the City of Project Applicant/Developer has paid all required in-lieu Rancho Cucamonga park fees and community and recreation center fees as Public Works,or required by Section 3.52 of the Rancho Cucamonga designee Municipal Code. 4.17:Transportation RCM-TR-1 Emergency Access Standards.Prior to the issuance of a Project Applicant, Prior to the issuance of building permit,the Applicant shall submit Final with verification by a building permit Circulation Design and Emergency Access Plans for review Director of the City of and approval by the Director of the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga(City)Planning Department,or designee,the Public Works,or Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD),and designee the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department(SBSD).The plans shall comply with all applicable City,RCFPD,and SBSD standards for appropriate emergency access.The plans shall address all aspects of ingress to and egress from the Project site and the on-site circulation system, including the width of all Project driveways and on-site roadways to ensure that the minimum acceptable turning radius required to accommodate emergency response vehicles is provided,and shall identify the location of all access gates,Knox boxes,and fire suppression facilities. In accordance with City,RCFPD,and SBSD standards,the Final Circulation Design and Emergency Access Plan shall P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» Page 4475-15 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure show evidence that all Project access points and the on- site circulation system are designed in accordance with all applicable emergency access standards to ensure adequate emergency responder accessibility to the Project site. 4.18:Tribal Cultural Resources TCR-1 Native American Monitoring. Prior to commencement of Director of the City of Prior to grading activities, the Director of the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga commencement of any Cucamonga Planning Department, or designee, shall Planning Department grubbing or grading confirm that a qualified Native American monitor has or designee activities/prior to been contacted and will be allowed access to the project commencement of any site to provide Native American monitoring services surface disturbance on during ground-disturbing project construction activities. the Project site The Native American monitor shall be selected by the City from the list of certified Native American monitors maintained by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians— Kizh Nation.—The selected Native American monitor(s) shall be invited to the pre-grading conference to establish procedures for tribal cultural resource surveillance. Monitoring procedures shall include provisions for temporarily halting or redirecting work and creating a 50- foot buffer zone area to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of resources deemed by the Native American monitor(s) to be tribal cultural resources as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21074. Construction activities can continue outside of this buffer zone area. These monitoring procedures shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Department, or designee, prior to commencement of any surface disturbance on the project site. The Native American monitor(s) shall complete monitoring logs on a daily basis that provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The Native American monitor(s) shall also provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, meeting or exceeding requirements specified by the Applicant. The on-site monitoring shall cease when project grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the tribal representatives and monitor(s) have indicated that the site has a low potential for tribal cultural resources. 5-16 P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.dol ag@8/ 0" INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J A Table S.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure TCR-2 Previously Unknown Tribal Cultural Resources.Prior to Director of the City of Prior to commencement of grading activities,the Director of the Rancho Cucamonga commencement of any City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,or Planning Department grubbing or grading designee,shall verify that all Project grading and or designee activities/prior to construction plans include requirements specifying that if commencement of any tribal cultural resources are discovered during surface disturbance on excavation,grading,or construction activities,work shall the Project site cease within 50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist(who meets Secretary of the Interior Standards)has evaluated the find in accordance with federal,State,and local guidelines to determine whether the find constitutes a"unique archaeological resource"as defined in Section 21083.2(g)of the California Public Resources Code(PRC).If the find is determined to be a unique archaeological resource,the found deposits shall be treated in accordance with federal,State,and local guidelines,including,but not limited to,those set forth in PRC Section 21083.2.Any finds dating to the pre-contact period shall be also assessed by a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians(who have requested to be given the opportunity to provide input with regards to significance and treatment of pre-contact finds)and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians— Kizh Nation to determine whether the find constitutes a "tribal cultural resource"as defined in PRC Section 21074.If the find is determined to be a tribal cultural resource,a representative from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation shall coordinate the treatment and curation of these resources with the Project Applicant/ Developer and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Should the find be deemed significant,as defined by CEQA,a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan(Plan)shall be created by the archaeologist,in coordination with the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation,and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan.This Plan shall allow for a Native American monitor from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation to continue to be present and for a Native American monitor from the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians to be present for the remainder of the Project,should the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians elect to place a monitor on-site.Construction personnel of the proposed Project shall not collect or move any archaeological or tribal cultural resources and associated materials.Construction activity may continue unimpeded on other portions of the Project site during assessment and treatment of tribal cultural resources. Any and all archaeological/cultural documents and records created as part of the Project shall be supplied to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for dissemination to the P:\STR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx«06/18/20» Page 4495-17 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Table 5.A: Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures and Regulatory Compliance Measures(RCM) Responsible Party Timing for RCM or Mitigation Measure San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation,and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall,in good faith, consult with the two tribes throughout the life of the Project. 4.19:Utilities and Service Systems RCM-UTL-1 Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. Prior to the Director of the City of Prior to the issuance of issuance of a grading permit,the City of Rancho Rancho Cucamonga a grading permit Cucamonga's Director of Planning,or designee,shall Planning Department confirm that the Final Landscaping Plan for the proposed or designee Project is consistent with all applicable provisions outlined in the City's Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. 4.20:Wildfire RCM-FIRE-1: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standard 49- Director of the City of Prior to the issuance of 1.The Project shall adhere to the requirements of Rancho Cucamonga any construction Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD) Planning Department permits Standard 49-1.The fire protection plan shall be approved or designee by RCFPD and recorded on the parcel prior to the issuance of any construction permits.In addition, Vegetation Management Zone 1 Fuel Modification is required to be completed before construction with combustible materials will be approved.The required fuel modification is required to be maintained for the duration of the construction. 4.21:Mandatory Findings of Significance The proposed Project would not result in any significant adverse impacts to mandatory findings of significance.No mitigation would be required. 5.18 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.doa 6/ z18 o P g/1 4 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 6.0 LIST OF PREPARERS 6.1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tabe van der Zwaag 6.2 LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Nicole Dubois, Principal, Environmental Nicole West, CPSWQ, QSD/QSP, Associate, Environmental Alyssa Helper, Senior Environmental Planner J.T. Stephens, Senior Noise Specialist Arthur Black,Associate,Transportation Elise Miller,Assistant Environmental Planner Abby Annicchiarico,Assistant Environmental Planner Gary Dow, Associate, Graphics Matt Phillips, Graphics Technician Tom Flahive, Senior GIS Specialist Justin Roos,Associate, GIS Jennette Bosseler,Senior Editor/Word Processor Chantik Virgil, Senior Word Processor Steve Dong, Senior Editor PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 6.1 Page 451 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 6.2 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/�QZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 7.0 REFERENCES CAL FIRE. 2012. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. Website: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ (accessed June 22, 2019). California Aquatic Resources Inventory. 2016. EcoAtlas: Existing Aquatic Resources. Website: https://www.ecoatlas.org/regions/ecoregion/south-coast(accessed June 13, 2019). California Air Resources Board. 2017. California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan: The Strategy for Achieving California's 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. 2020. MSEI - Documentation - Off-Road - Diesel Equipment. Website: https:Hww2.arb. ca.gov/our-work/programs/mobile-source-emissions-inventory/road-documentation/msei- documentation-road (accessed March 2020). California Department of Conservation. 1976. Division of Mines and Geology. Special Report 113: Geologic Hazards in Southwestern San Bernardino County, California. 2016. California Important Farmland Finder. Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ DLRP/CIFF/(accessed May 9, 2019). 2017. Division of Land Resource Protection. State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. 2018. Division of Mines and Geology. Mineral Land Classification Map. Special Report 143 Plate 7.1, 1983. n.d. California Geological Survey. California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ cgs/EQZApp/app/(Accessed March 9, 2020). California Department of Finance. 2019. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2011-2019 with 2010 Census Benchmark City/County Population and Housing Estimates. May. California Department of Forestry and Fire (CAL FIRE). 2012. Fire Hazard Severity Zones Webviewer. Website: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/(accessed June 22, 2019.) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). California Scenic Highway Mapping System (San Bernardino County). Website: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_ highways/(accessed May 6, 2019). California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2016. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Website: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/ Genera l/Rates#Residential (accessed June 19, 2019). PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 7-1 Page 453 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 California Department of Water Resources. 2016. SIGMA Basin Prioritization Dashboard, Groundwater Basins 2016. Website: https:Hgis.water.ca.gov/app/bp-dashboard/p2/ (accessed June 10, 2019). 2020. "Groundwater Sustainability Plans." Website: https://water.ca.gov/Programs/ Groundwater-Management/SGMA-Groundwater-Management/Groundwater-Sustainability- Plans (accessed March 8, 2020). California Energy Commission. 2018. Energy Consumption Data Management Service. Electricity Consumption by County. Website: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx (accessed March 2020). 2019.2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission. Docket# 19-IEPR- 01. Chaffey Joint Union High School District. 2011. Boundary Map. . 2018. About the District. Chino Basin Watermaster. 2019a. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. . 2019b. Overview. Website: http://www.cbwm.org/overview.htm (accessed June 11, 2019). City of Ontario. 2011. LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Website: http://www.ontarioplan.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/pdfs/ALUCP_FULL.pdf (accessed June 11, 2019). City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010a. General Plan. Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. 2010b. General Plan. Chapter 3: Community Mobility. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/ civicax/filebank/blobd load.aspx?BIobID=6814(accessed June 11, 2019). 2010c. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.7: Geology and Soils. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/ civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BIobID=7601 (accessed May 6, 2019). 2010d. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.15: Parks and Recreation. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BIobID=7609 (accessed June 7, 2019). 2010e. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.16: Traffic and Transportation. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobd load.aspx?BIobID=7610 (accessed May 13, 2019). 2010f. General Plan EIR. Chapter 4.17: Utilities and Service Systems. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobd load.aspx?BIobID=7611 (accessed June 13, 2019). 7-2 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1$/�Ol> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J 2010g. General Plan. Chapter 6: Resource Conservation Element. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/blobd load.aspx?BIobID=6817 (accessed May 6, 2019). 2010h. General Plan Chapter 8: Public Health and Safety. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/ civicax/filebank/blobd load.aspx?Blob ID=6819 (accessed June 11, 2019). 2010i. Overview of Departmental Operating Budgets. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/c ivicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=5560 (accessed June 17, 2019). 2010j. Public Facilites and Infrastructure Element. 2013. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Website: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/filebank/ blobdload.aspx?BIobID=5780 (accessed May 13, 2019). 2014. Development Impact Fee Study Report. 2015. Ready RC:Before, During and After an Emergency in Rancho Cucamonga. 2017. Sustainable Community Action Plan. 2019a. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood &Conservation Plan. 2019b. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2018. About Us. Website: https://www.cvwdwater.com/35/ About-Us (accessed June 12, 2019). 2015. Urban Water Management Plan. Website: https://www.cvwdwater.com/ DocumentCenter/View/1955/2015-Urban-Water-Management-Plan---CVWD?bidld= (accessed June 14, 2019). County of San Bernardino. 2013. Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. Appendix F: HCOC Exemption Criteria and Map. 2019a. Countywide Plan Draft EIR. Website: http://countywideplan.com/wp-content/ uploads/2019/06/Ch_05-18-USS.pdf(accessed June 17, 2019). 2019b. Countywide Plan Draft EIR. Section 5.18: Utilities and Service Systems. Etiwanda School District. 2017. Attendance Boundaries. Effective July 1, 2017. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Draft National Flood Hazard Viewer. Website: https://fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=29f87515702d4845a906 419b287e2049 (accessed May 29, 2019). Fehr& Peers. 2018. Westbury Transportation Impact Analysis. PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 7-3 Page 455 LC A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA DUNE 2020 Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 2018. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. Leighton and Associates, Inc. 2016. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, West of East Avenue and Approximately 500 Feet North of Foothill Boulevard, APN 1100- 191-04-000, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. October. Omnitrans. 2019. System Map. Website: http://www.omnitrans.org/schedules/pdf/system-map/ Omnitrans_System_Map_0519.pdf(accessed June 20, 2010). San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG). 2016. San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Final Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July. 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Website: http://www.agmd.gov/home/rules- compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ceqa-air-quality-handbook-(1993) (accessed June 24, 2019). 2018. Fact Sheet for Applying CaIEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. Website: www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/ localized-significance-thresholds/ caleemod-guidance.pdf(accessed February 2018). Transportation Research Board. 2016. Highway Capacity Manual. (HCM), 61" Edition. United States Census Bureau. 2010 Census,Table DP-1. 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates,Table DP05. American Fact Finder. Rancho Cucamonga, California 2018 Population Estimate. United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2017. Website: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1917/1917.28AppA (accessed June 14, 2019). United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species Webviewer. Website: https:Hfws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap= 9d8de5e265ad4fe09893cf75b8dbfb77 (accessed May 24, 2019). 2020. National Wetlands Inventory. Webviewer: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/ Mapper.html. 7-4 PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean. cx2g 66/1$/�0,�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C DUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J United States Geological Survey. U.S. Quaternary Faults Webviewer. Website: https://usgs. maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=5a6O38b3al68456la9bOaadf88412fcf (accessed March 9, 2020). PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx <06/18/20» 7_5 Page 457 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank 7_6 P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/�(�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS REPORT P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 459 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/�(�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX B BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 461 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/WQZ> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX C ARBORIST REPORT P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 463 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/WOj> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX D CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 465 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/W(jt> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX E PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 467 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/�(�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 469 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/j(�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX G PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 471 Le WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank PASTR1901-Westbury\Initial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/ 2 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX H PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 473 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/IV0j> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX I NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 475 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/j(jt> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX J WESTBURY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 477 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/j(�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX K WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE WITH PUBLIC SERVICE PROVIDERS P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 479 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/ (�> INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT C A JUNE 2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA J`L` APPENDIX L TRIBAL CONSULTATION CORRESPONDENCE P:\STR1901-Westbury\lnitialStudy_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.docx a06/18/20» Page 481 Le A WESTBURY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION J A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA JUNE 2020 This page intentionally left blank P:\STR1901-West bury\IInitial Study_Mitigated Negative Declaration\Proposed Final\Proposed Final ISMND Clean.�cxx<<66/1$/ QZ> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 245 2020 A. Call to Order The meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on June 24, 2020. The meeting was called to order my Chairman Guglielmo at 7:00pm. Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales. and Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director: Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Brian Sandona, Sr. Civil Engineer; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Sr. Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened the public communications and hearing no comment, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 24, 2020 Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 to adopt the minutes as presented. D. Public Hearings D1. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20148, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018- 00770, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00867 AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM 2019- 00959 —SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -A request for site plan and architectural review of a mixed-use development with 131 residential units, 4 commercial ready units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space that includes a tentative tract map for condominium purposes, a request to amend the text and figures related to mixed use development in the Development Code, a Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU), a Tree removal permit to remove 32 trees and a Uniform Sign Program for onsite signage on a 11.44 acre project site in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard —APN: 1100-191-04. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — June 24, 2020 Page 1 of 4 Page 483 �r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 24, 2020 Tabe van der Zwaag presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Tabe mentioned in his report that during the public comment period of the Initial Study, staff received comments from CA Department of Fish and Wildlife requesting changes to the timing and protocol for the pre-construction survey for the various species including the Burrowing Owl. The applicant environmental consultant has updated the Initial Study Mitigation monitoring plan with the updated language provided by CDFW. The updated environmental documents are in the package before Commission tonight. In accordance with CEQA guideline Section 150741, staff has determined the updated mitigation measures will be equal and more effective in mitigating the potential project related biological impacts than the original mitigation measures. Tabe also stated for the record staff received a letter today from Debra Kinsinger raising project concerns due to the biological study and mitigation measures in the biological study. The letter states when Debra Kinsinger, who is the consultant for the project to the South, when she did her biological survey for the parcel in 2017, she observed Borrowing Owls on the project site. She requested the Commission require the applicant confer with CDFW prior to certification of the Initial Study. The applicant for the project LSA has provided a letter responding to the comments received by Ms. Kinsinger which states the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW included in the IS and MMP address the concerns raised related to the potential loss of the Burrowing Owl habitat. Staff has reviewed the updated mitigation measures and while staff is not an environmental expert, they feel the updated mitigation measures appear to address the concerns raised by Ms. Kinsinger. For the record, Resolution 20-29, Attachment A — Page 1 (first paragraph), strike-out line moved when changing the font size during editing. It has been corrected and presented before Commissioners tonight. Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. Brandon Roth, Applicant, thanked City of Rancho Cucamonga and staff for all their hard work and looks forward to building in the city. Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated great staff report and the project team did a real good job responding to concerns raised in the workshop. It has a lot of what we just saw in our joint session with City Council in terms of how the land is being used. It will compliment very nicely the project to the South when that gets built. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — June 24, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Page 484 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 24, 2020 Commissioner Williams stated she likes the project, especially the arrangements of the balconies. Expressed her disappointment there is no tot lot. Nonetheless, she likes the project and it will make the corner look very striking with the two projects we have lined up there. Commissioner Dopp stated he agrees with fellow Commissioners. Expressed he likes the street parking, if that helps alleviate some of the concerns on the site, it would be a big benefit. Related to the trail, he would like to add that a project be considered down the line, if there is a way to connect to that trail be considered in the future and address that concern for the residents. Enjoys any opportunity to see mixed-use in some of these areas where we think would be a good utilization. Would like set into the record; what we want to see out of more standard mixed-use developments that come down the pike is we do want to see mixed-use actually mean mixed-use. He realizes this is a special exception due to lot size but for future developers reading into the record recognizing that mixed-use does mean mixed-use. If this was on a different site, he would probably have a problem with it. Chairman Guglielmo mentioned he saw the project at the Design Review Committee. Given the size and shape of the lot, utility, easements, obstructing a large portion of it, they did a great job. A very well- thought-out project. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca to approve item D1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. E. General Business - None F. Director Announcements Anne McIntosh, Planning Director reminded Commissioners of next week's Forum for Our Future. This is a virtual version of what we would normally do in person with a community workshop. She explained the 3-day workshop schedule in detail. The Commissioners do not have a formal role, but your participation is encouraged so you can hear what is of interest to community members. A final version of the schedule will be provided to Commissioners and will be on the PlanRC website. G. Commission Announcements Commissioner Dopp commented on the presentation by Urban 3 Economic Development last week. He was very impressed with the data and asked that we discuss how the Commission or Planning Department can use this information in the future. It would be a worth-while discussion to have in light of everything that was discussed on Wednesday with City Council. Commissioners agreed. Anne McIntosh mentioned that the data will be used in the development of the General Plan, but that there might be project based applications as well. H. Workshops — None HPCIPC Meeting Minutes — June 24, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Page 485 �r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 245 2020 I. Adjournment Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Dopp, to adjourn the meeting; motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 8:00pm. Respectfully submitted, IE eth Thornhill E= cutive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: July 8, 2020— Regular Meeting HPC/PC Meeting Minutes—June 24, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Page 486 ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992, TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 17.36.020 TO ELIMINATE TEXT, FIGURES, AND TABLES RELATED TO DEFINING THE LOCATION AND MIX OF USES WITHIN EACH MIXED-USE AREA WITHIN THE CITY FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT CODE FIGURE 17.38.060-1 AND FIGURE 17.38.060-15 TO REFLECT THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE (DRC2018-00994) AMENDING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF THE PROJECT SITE FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT TO MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 131-UNIT, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS WHICH INCLUDES 4 COMMERCIAL READY LIVEWORK UNTS AND 1,500 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; APN: 1100-191-04. A. Recitals. 1. SC Westbury Limited Partnership, filed an application for the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of June 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted it's Resolution No. 20-29, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Zoning Map Amendment. 3. On August 19, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00992. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on August 19, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The 11.44-acre project site is located on the west side of East Avenue, approximately 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard; and C. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will Page 487 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992— SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 2 be used for parking and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped; and d. The vacant project site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees; and e. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Vacant Open Space (OS) District Site Mixed-Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed-Use Mixed-Use (MU) District East Single-Family City of Fontana City of Fontana Residences Utility Open Space (OS) District West Infrastructure Utility Corridor Commercial Office (CO) District f. Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 amends Chapters 17.36 and 17.38 of the Development Code related to the change in zoning of the project site from Community Commercial to Mixed Use. The amendment will modify Development Code Section 17.36.020 (Development standards for mixed-use zoning districts) to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed-use area within the City. On June 15, 2016, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887, which similarly eliminated tables in General Plan which described the uses and development ranges permitted within each area designated for Mixed-Use development. The proposed changes will bring the Development Code into alignment with the General Plan and will provide more flexibility in the development of mixed-use zoning areas. The amendment will also modify Development Code Figure 17.38.060-1 (Foothill Boulevard Subareas) and Figure 17.38.060- 15 (Subarea 4 Map) to reflect the proposed zone change; and g. The overall project scope includes Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, to change the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed-Use (MU), Design Review DRC2018-00770, for the site plan and architectural design of the proposed 131-unit mixed-use development, Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 to remove 32 onsite trees and Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 for onsite signage. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: Page 488 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992— SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 3 a. This Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The Amendment is related to Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, which changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District, in conformance with the Mixed Use (MU) General Plan land use designation. The Amendment updates text, tables, figures in the Development Code to reflect the new Zoning Map designation and eliminates any conflicts or inconsistencies between the General Plan and the Development Code; and b. This Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code. The purpose and intent of the Development Code is to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to guide and manage the future growth of the City. The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Mixed Use (MU) District. The related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00994) changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District, in conformance with the Mixed Use (MU) General Plan land use designation. The Amendment updates text, tables, and figures in the Development Code to reflect the related Zoning Map Amendment, thus implementing the goals and objectives of the General Plan; and C. The proposed Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project related to the Amendment was reviewed by the Design Review Committee and is of the same high-quality design as the surrounding development and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The Development Code is required to be consistent with the land use element of the General Plan. The Amendment modifies text, tables, and figures in the Development Code to reflect the related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00994), eliminating any conflicts or inconsistencies between the General Plan and the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Mixed Use (MU). The related Zoning Map Amendment (DRC2018-00994) amends the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use (MU) to be in conformance with the General Plan land use designation. The Amendment updates text, tables, and figures in the Development Code to bring the Development Code into conformance with the new General Plan land use designation and Zoning Map designation of the project site. SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a Page 489 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992— SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 4 significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. During the public comment period for the Initial Study, staff received comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) requesting changes in the timing and protocol for the preconstruction surveys for various species including the burrowing owl. The applicant's environmental consultant (LSA) has updated the IS and Mitigation Monitoring Plan with the updated language provided by CDFW. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.1, staff has determined that the updated mitigation measures will be equal or more effective in mitigating the project related biological impacts than the original mitigation measures. Staff received a letter dated June 24, 2020 (Debra Kinsinger), raising concerns related to the biological study and mitigation measures provided by the applicant's consultant (LSA). The letter states that when Ms. Kinsinger performed a biological survey for the parcel to the south in 2017, she observed burrowing owls on the project site. She requested that the Planning Commission require that the applicant confer with CDFW prior to certification of the Initial Study. The applicant's environmental consultant (LSA) provided a letter responding to the comments received from Ms. Kinsinger, which outlines that the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW included in the IS and MMP address the concerns raised related to the potential loss of burrowing owl habitat. The Planning Commission agreed with the applicant's consultant (LSA), that the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW address Ms. Kinsinger's concerns and recommended City Council approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration as presented. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council, therefore, adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-2750. SECTION 5: The Development Code amendment hereby amends the text, tables, and figures in the Development Code as shown on Attachment A and subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent Page 490 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992— SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 5 jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Page 491 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 6 "Attachment A" 17.36.020 Development standards for mixed use zoning districts. A. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the city's Mixed Use Zoning District. The general plan establishes 14 mixed use sites throughout the Gity with the intent tG Greate speGial urban plaGeS with horizontal and/or VeFt'Gal integration of uses. in the general plan, eaGh mixed use site Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within a Mixed Use District and are intended to be consistent with and implement the general plan. See €gu,re 17.36.0 -1 (Mixed Use c FIGT;RE 17.36.020-1 MIXED USE SITES �wwNw� ww..wrwu +AnwRieaM JCYr��YnwACI IkaO�m!D 7�YM /ry or.p1q i� 7awrp 1. ViGtOria Gardens/ Trtoria Arbors 2. Town Center Foothill Boulevard and Haven venue). Page 492 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 7 3. Terra Vost�Toc� - r�ccr. 4.Feethill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue. 5. Foothill Boulevard between Trhiheld Avenue and Hellman Avenue. o Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Ste� 7. Foo milteg Avenue. g. industrmal Area Spur Plan (Sigh-Area 18) �nothil�r it Boui are a-rd a�veer Greek Channel"eIl. Tv Haveg Avenue and ChUFGh Street sate w ester Gateway (Bear GUIGh area). 12 Foothill Boulevard ��Ea�vnga Channel .site. �v�teriGAllta-Loma (At t"��), 14 NWG Foothill Boulevard and Fe�st venue. G. Mixed use site development standards. General site development standards for mixed use DistriGtS). These develepment standards supplemeRt the development standwds on aFtoGle IV (Site Development Provisions) that apply to all ZOR.ng diStFiGtS e parking, e ligh TA�E17.36.v22 1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MIXED USE SITES* Land Use nn•nn•x - Average nn.,e.+ I Ins a+sue l #6 Resen+•al dal Offe Quasm-Public- Ran" \/in+nrio ('_or.+nno/\/in+.,rim Arhnrs 21� 2n^104 _ F Town Center(Fo-p-thill Bouilevard and Haven 25 k a A-4�k 9- 0 i o% 44 �/as Avenue) Tnrr;;Vast;; - 9 20 d, lAn Cnn+hill RA-Jnvnrd hnfiunnn I-Inrrnno.o nvpm-e r nd Cczn+nr Avenue Cnn+hill RA-dpw;rd hnfiunnn nrnhih;;Id nvnni-e �� tl-r-�70% 20 22% - - 1,r1 /on/on �nr! Hellm-An nvenue Cnn+hill Rn,Jnvnrd At Ht-irn,.; nvnnum and 20-40% 60-70% - - 39-du/as Hampshire Street Cnn+hill RnuIn„ter,+and nn",+nn n„nn��n % 4.0 600% 6-i 010; 4-04 24-30-dw/2E Induq-trial nre-a Cnenifin Plan 1122% % 40 60% -77 6 Cnn+hill Roy Jn..wd end Ilnnr CrnnL Ch;;nnnl 70--75% % 14 d,,lAn H;wpn Nopm m And Chi irrh Q+rnn+Qi+n Q 1a A C1111AG Page 493 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992— SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 8 1Nes+err, r+ey,e„(Beer nUh.h Area) 28-5904 58-7004 - - 14 d-l26 Foothill Boulevard and 8-1 98% - 9-a AA°/a - 8-1.4 was S#e u•S+Grip Alta I e (Amethyst Site) 8 490% 9 i99% _ 14 7 WA/f Crne+hill Rr.-Jevord and Cos+ Avenue 0 100% _ 0 1000% _ 14 24 dula. * This+ohlp only applies to a it inr. Mixed Use sites. Proposed Amendment FIGURE 17.38.060-1 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SUBAREAS SMARFA f $UBARIA 2 $UDARU1 4 r " Modify Figure 17.38.060-1 to change O the zoning designation + L� ofAPN_1100-191-04 from Community or ifhVi•, �' Commercial(CC)to !;�' i Mixed Use(MU) 1 1 III~+mow L &A wA/aw w r.A" a r Mw M[ i 10K h 1i�11yf��4C �M�4�M1 rtiAl�dllA Rt 1 I�fOwwlrl'O Page 494 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 9 Proposed Amendment Modify Figure 17.38.060-15 to FIGURE 17.38.060-15 SUBAREA 4 MAP change the zoning designation ofAPN: 1100-191-04 from Community Commercial(CC)to Mixed Use(MU) �AAIA ■ 1 ■ ■ ' � �yE•+�.,rya-[J. ifyril �MFM\rl■� ��7LA14■FMfMa �■gM�1M/1 �lir�■M/qw rOw wOak"o1 in 1111100"Va0wom iwln'gwww.rP" 41n■ncr m Poo 1111110pNiss" ra•.AMY■■w+1�p1 coapmft ,Ift _� ra■1r.rC.1..rrpA r�w.roM Page 495 ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994 TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 11.44 ACRES OF LAND FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT TO MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 131-UNIT, MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS WHICH INCLUDES 4 COMMERCIAL READY LIVEWORK UNTS AND 1,500 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; APN: 1100-191-04. A. Recitals. 1. SC Westbury Limited Partnership, filed an application for the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Zoning Map Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of June 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted it's Resolution No. 20-30, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Zoning Map Amendment. 3. On August 19, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on August 19, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The project site made up of 3.76 acres of land unencumbered by easements. Of the remainder of the property, 1.98 acres are within a Southern California Gas Company easement that will be used for parking and 5.7 acres are within a Southern California Edison easement that will be left undeveloped; and c. The vacant project site slopes from north to south and is covered by low vegetation and multiple eucalyptus trees; and d. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 496 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Utility Corridor Vacant Open Space (OS) District Site Mixed-Use Community Commercial (CC) District; Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 4 North Utility Corridor Utility Corridor Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Vacant Land Mixed-Use Mixed-Use (MU) District East Single-Family City of Fontana City of Fontana Residences West Utility Utility Corridor Open Space (OS) District Infrastructure Commercial Office (CO) District e. The application is in conjunction with the subdivision of 11.44 acres of vacant land (Related File: SUBTT20148) to create one numbered and one lettered lot tentative tract map for condominium purposes. The numbered lot will include the residential/commercial portion of the project site and the lettered lot will include the existing utility easements (including a portion of the parking lot); and f. Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 necessitates amending the Development Code (DRC2018-00992) to amend text, tables, and figures in the Development Code related to the zone change of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District; and g. The overall project scope includes Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992, to change text, tables, and figures in the Development Code related to the change in the zoning designation from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed-Use (MU) District, Design Review DRC2018-00770, for the site plan and architectural design of the proposed 131-unit mixed-use development, Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00867 to remove 32 onsite trees and Uniform Sign Program DRC2019-00959 for onsite signage. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. The subject property is located on a major street and provides adequate vehicle and pedestrian access. The project is compatible with the existing development in the area, including the approved multi-family develop to the south of the project site; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The Initial Study Part II prepared for the project outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less-than-significant; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The subject Zoning Map Amendment changes the zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial Page 497 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 3 (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District, in conformance with the General Plan Mixed Use (MU) land use designation. SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, LSA has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by First Carbon Solutions, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. During the public comment period for the Initial Study, staff received comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) requesting changes in the timing and protocol for the preconstruction surveys for various species including the burrowing owl. The applicant's environmental consultant (LSA) has updated the IS and Mitigation Monitoring Plan with the updated language provided by CDFW. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.1, staff has determined that the updated mitigation measures will be equal or more effective in mitigating the project related biological impacts than the original mitigation measures. Staff received a letter dated June 24, 2020 (Debra Kinsinger), raising concerns related to the biological study and mitigation measures provided by the applicant's consultant (LSA). The letter states that when Ms. Kinsinger performed a biological survey for the parcel to the south in 2017, she observed burrowing owls on the project site. She requested that the Planning Commission require that the applicant confer with CDFW prior to certification of the Initial Study. The applicant's environmental consultant (LSA) provided a letter responding to the comments received from Ms. Kinsinger, which outlines that the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW included in the IS and MMP address the concerns raised related to the potential loss of burrowing owl habitat. The Planning Commission agreed with the applicant's consultant (LSA), that the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW address Ms. Kinsinger's concerns and recommended City Council approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration as presented. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures Page 498 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 4 during project implementation. The City Council, therefore, adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-2750. SECTION 5: The Zoning Map is hereby amended to change the zoning designation for 11.44 acres of land from Community Commercial (CC) District to Mixed Use (MU) District, as shown in Attachment A. SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Page 499 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 5 "Attachment A" 1 Proposed Zane Change Law Medium (LM) Change the zoning designation of APN- 1100-191-04 from Community Commercial(CC)to Mixed Use(MU) Park(P) e�4e I �JQ I v � I I I e Project site ` I I r Community + Commercial(CC) w I Commercial r Office(CC) Mixed Use(MU) Foothill Boulevard Medium (M) Page 500 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. XXX ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994 — SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP August 19, 2020 Page 6 Page 501 N. r r ,r /N+ Vd'` A7' �. IFA Westbury August 19, 2020 �r��r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r Project Background • Who: Stratham Homes • What: 131 residential unit Mixed-Use project • Where : West side of East Avenue - 500 feet north of Foothill Boulevard Entitlements Planning Commission Approval (June 24, 2020) • Tentative Tract Map - SUBTT20148 • Design Review - DRC2018-00770 • Tree Removal Permit - DRC2019-00867 • Sign Program - DRC2019-00959 City Council Approval • Development Code Amendment - DRC2018-00992 • Zoning Map Amendment - DRC2018-00994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Development Code Amendment • Amend Development Code Section 17. 36.020 to eliminate text, figures, and tables related to defining the location and mix of uses within each mixed-use area within the City; • Modify Development Code Figure 17. 38.060-1 and Figure 17. 38.060-15 to reflect the proposed zone change. Zoning Map Amendment • Changes zoning designation of the project site from Community Commercial (CC) to Mixed Use ( MU ) in conformance with the General Plan . Project Site Breakdown The 11.44-acre triangular shaped project site is made up of the following: • 3.76 acres unencumbered by easements • 1.98 acres within a Southern California Gas Company easement to be used for project parking • 5.7 acres within a Southern California Edison easement to be left undeveloped y b Ort@I Ct fK WOL,4 Park'ng L y n 8rC18 • .7'' C � .. RE -� co Garcia Park " .- id � r Co fa . Le F ` i Foothill Bl ill BIM Historic Rte Foothill BIWe CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r 26. Looking Northwest CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r 4� r I ,r b ��h Looking Southwest Proposed Overview • Proposed Mixed-Use Development that includes : • 131 residential units (73 one-bedroom and 58 two-bedroom units); • 4 commercial ready units (305 square feet each), that are attached to one-bedroom residential units; • A 1,500-square foot commercial space. • Project Density: 22 DU Per Acre (3 .76 Acres); • Market Rate Rental Community; • Combination of 3-story flats and Carriage Units; • Units Rang in size from 676 to 1, 174 square feet; • Recreational Amenities include Pool/spa, BBQ facilities, clubhouse; fitness room, open spaces areas and multiple sports courts. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA col ��a per �I►. ems'_ i Fj ® �®AT m� ®q S WE ram■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r Minimum Requireme/Maxnt ro ose om liant? Building Setback (East Avenue) 35 feet* feet-9 - Setback Side Property line5 Feet 5 feet Yes Height limit Landscape Coverage10 Percent - Open Space Per Unit150 Square Fe Feet Yes et 364 Square Density50 Units per Acre per Acre Yes *Mixed-Use Projects are Permitted an 5 ercent educ ion �r r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r �r Parkin Anal sis Number • Required of • • ParkingRatio Parking 1.5 per garage or Multi-family units (one bedroom) carport 110 per • _ or Multi-family units (two bedrooms) 58 N/A carport 116 Visitor parking (multi-family) per 3 units 44 Commercial/Office per 250 square feet • Commercial Ready per feet 5 250 square Total Parking Spaces Required281 Total Parking Spaces Provided285 Total Parking Spaces on Easement Total Garage Parking Spaces Provided/Required 143 134/131 Parking Surplus �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HI s g s s• a' +s YAY/A1'kY'lIITT1 PpkALLk OFFER BIKE DUFFER LANE TWOWRYLEFf TURNIANE f1m410.Ly PAWING LANE Y 5' 19• CITY OF ♦ • CUCAMONGA �[, Dj's EnMertain - rtet C1 � �t .13 3 da r�14 y atr� WOL A rking Pa REMUVAi Garcia Park ' .. s yg- Project Site Patricia+t ., 1 r' J.' J'ame stow Ci t_rie Rte b oothil{61v W Historic Rte Fife''- o R HIM Foothill Blv I Generator aort2--- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r Environmental • An Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by LSA and peer-reviewed by First Carbon Solutions; • Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment; • A Mitigation Monitoring Program was prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. Environmental Continued • During the public comment period for the Initial Study, staff received comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) requesting changes in the timing and protocol for the preconstruction surveys for various species including the burrowing owl; • The applicants environmental consultant modified the IS and Mitigation Monitoring Plan with the updated language provided by CDFW. The updated environmental documents are in the package before the Commission; • In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15074.1 , staff has determined that the updated mitigation measures will be equal or more effective in mitigating the project related biological impacts than the original mitigation measures. Public Comments • Staff received a letter dated June 24, 2020 (Debra Kinsinger), raising concerns related to the biological study and mitigation measures provided by the applicant's consultant (LSA). The letter stated that when she performed a biological survey for the parcel to the south in 2017, she observed burrowing owls on the project site. She requested that the Planning Commission require that the applicant confer with CDFW prior to certification of the Initial Study; • The applicant's environmental consultant (LSA) provided a letter responding to the comments received from Ms. Kinsinger, which states that the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW included in the IS and MMP address the concerns raised related to the potential loss of burrowing owl habitat. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council take the following action : • Approve Development Code Amendment DRC2018-00992 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00994 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. Olt, DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Donny Mahoney, Captain / Chief of Police Rob Ball, Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Consideration to Receive and File a Report Detailing the Actions Taken by Fire District and Sheriff's Department Staff On and Before the 4th of July Holiday to Reduce and Discourage the Possession and Use of Fireworks, Enforce Local and State Laws Regarding Fireworks, and Prevent Fires Associated with Fireworks and Seasonal Weather Conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Fire District's Board of Directors receive and file a report that details the actions taken by Fire District and Sheriff's Department staff, working cooperatively with City and County partners, detailing efforts taken on and before the 4th of July holiday to prevent the use of fireworks and prevent fires that could potentially be caused by the unlawful use of fireworks. BACKGROUND: Since 1989, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prohibited the use of all consumer-grade fireworks. This action was taken, in large part, in recognition of the significant wildland fire hazard that exists in the City and the adjacent unincorporated area as well as the nearby national forest. Every year, Fire District staff engage in multiple efforts to enforce the fireworks-related codes and laws along with taking measures to reduce the likelihood of a wildfire ignition as a result of illegal use of fireworks. With COVID-19 impacting just about everything this year, there were competing theories as to how a pandemic and its effects would impact personal decisions concerning illegal fireworks. One theory was that economic hardship caused by efforts to limit the rate of spread of the virus might result in less discretionary income for the purchase of fireworks.An opposing theory was that since most public fireworks shows would likely be canceled and people were tired of being confined to their homes, personal use of fireworks might be more significant than an average year. Fire Prevention (Prevention) staff monitored news reports on the topic and engaged contacts within the fireworks industry to get a pulse on potential usage of fireworks. It quickly became apparent that the trend was higher than normal sales of consumer fireworks, including those that are illegal statewide in California. With that knowledge, Fire District staff deployed our standard prevention and community outreach efforts but with enhancements where possible and practical. Fireworks Interdiction and Confiscation Prevention staff assisted with and supported a fireworks interdiction program at the port of entry at the California-Nevada border on Interstate 15. This operation had the support of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, the agency that staffs the inspection station just inside California. The operation is intended to seize fireworks, which are legal in Nevada but illegal in California, before they enter California Page 502 through San Bernardino County. The program is managed by the San Bernardino County Fire Department. Colton Fire Department is the only other San Bernardino County fire agency besides the Fire District that still provides staffing for this effort. In past years, several fire agencies in the County provided personnel, but with increased costs due to the inspection station moving from Yermo to the state line, most agencies no longer participate. This year,the combined task force confiscated approximately 40,000 pounds of illegal fireworks throughout the four weekends in June. Information published by national news organizations indicated that sales of fireworks like those sold in Nevada were up approximately 30% from last year. Thwarting Illegal Sales Beginning in early June, Prevention staff began monitoring social media platforms for advertisements offering fireworks for sale in Rancho Cucamonga. Using aliases, contact was made with 33 potential sellers. In a coordinated effort, Deputies from the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's station and Prevention staff arranged five purchases of fireworks resulting in $5,000 in fines and the confiscation of more than 90 pounds of fireworks. Planning and Coordination Consistent with previous years, Fire District and Sheriff's Department staff closely collaborated to produce a coordinated deployment of resources on the 4th of July. The Rancho Cucamonga Station Traffic Division, worked closely with the Fire District's Operations Division to develop a comprehensive incident action plan intended to provide guidance to Deputies and Prevention staff about patrol, enforcement, and confiscation efforts. With the cancellation of the fireworks show at the Epicenter, the Sheriff's Department shifted staffing to fireworks patrol and enforcement, which resulted in a larger number of patrol teams than would normally be available. Additionally, the Sheriff's Department provided a continuously staffed non- emergency phone number that could be used by residents to report the use of fireworks. This number was published on community outreach materials produced by City and Fire District staff. Community Outreach Using data gathered in previous years, Fire District staff, with the assistance of DoIT were able to generate a map showing the areas in the City from where the use of fireworks had been reported. As in past years, the Fire District used this data to target community outreach messaging. Just over 13,500 postcards with a No Fireworks message, in both English and Spanish, were sent directly to Rancho Cucamonga households located in neighborhoods with a history of fireworks use. This data was also used to place twenty-five 4-foot by 8-foot No Fireworks banners in strategic locations that included entry points and high traffic locations within the neighborhoods. Additionally, social media was used to get the message out that all fireworks are illegal in Rancho Cucamonga. The final analysis of the social media campaign found that the messages reached more than 90,000 individual social media users. Social media messages included an appeal to the better nature of residents by reminding them that fireworks can be traumatic to neighbors suffering from the effects of PTSD, can be stressful to pets, and are a source of serious injuries. This campaign is known as Vets, Pets, and Regrets. The Fire District also made use of the electronic billboards located on 1-15, Archibald Avenue and Foothill Blvd, the RC Sports Center, and the Lewis Family Playhouse. Reporting In addition to publicizing the Sheriff and Fire dispatch non-emergency phone numbers that could be used to report fireworks, the Fire District worked with DoIT to add a fireworks reporting capability to the RC2GO app. The app was used more than 100 times to report the use of fireworks. The app was especially helpful on the 4t" of July by providing real-time information on the use of fireworks that could be relayed to patrol teams in the field. Enforcement Prevention staff assembled themselves into three two-person teams on July 3rd to respond to reports of fireworks being used. On July 4tn Prevention staff partnered with Sheriff's Deputies for a total of five two- Page 2 Page 503 person teams to patrol for and respond to reports of the use of fireworks. Those efforts resulted in the confiscation of nearly 150 pounds of fireworks, with 11 citations being issued to people using fireworks. Closures Working in cooperation with the County Special Districts division and the County Fire Department, the Fire District closed the North Etiwanda Preserve from the evening of July 3rd through the morning of July 5th This was done in response to weather forecasts calling for warm and breezy weather conditions and an anticipated higher than normal usage of fireworks.The objective was to prevent a wildfire from being ignited in the Preserve and causing damage and harm to vegetation and wildlife. Additionally, the Fire District took the proactive step of closing the area of Snowdrop and Santina roads for the same period of time. This area has historically been a favorite destination for those who want to look out over the valley at all of the fireworks. Unfortunately, some of those who make their way to Snowdrop and Santina unwisely discharge fireworks in this very high fire hazard area. Even with most public shows being canceled, it was anticipated that the area might still be an attractive place to view what was expected to be numerous illegal home and neighborhood fireworks displays, especially those in neighboring cities that are easily seen from higher elevation vantage points. The area was closed by order of the Fire Chief under authority granted by the Board of Directors. The Public Works Department assisted with a road closure plan. It provided the necessary barricades while the Community Services Department assisted with printing large format signs that notified the public of the closures. ANALYSIS: As predicted by the rate sales leading into the 4th of July holiday, 2020 was undeniably one of the most active years for consumer/household fireworks use in the Fire District in a very long time. The proliferation of fireworks was not unique to Rancho Cucamonga. An article published in late June in Fire Engineering magazine noted that some fireworks retailers were reporting sales to be up 200% from 2019. Information obtained from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department found that there were 2,918 reports of illegal fireworks between July 1st and July 5th this year. In 2019, there were 1,434 reports of illegal fireworks over the same four-day period, giving 2020 more than double the number of reports received in 2019. Despite the increase in fireworks usage this year, Rancho Cucamonga did not have any significant fireworks-related fires or reported injuries. Some of our neighboring cities were not as fortunate. The Prevention Bureau has been provided with a robust amount of staff. However, the ten people who comprise the Prevention Bureau serve a population in excess of 177,000. As a society, we depend on the vast majority of citizens to obey the laws in the interest of community safety, quality of life, and property protection. We will continue, and even increase, efforts to appeal to the better nature of the residents of this fine City as we engage next year to bring the level of fireworks usage back down in the interest of preventing fires, injuries, and the stresses caused by the illegal use of fireworks. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fire District's personnel costs associated with fire prevention, compliance with local fireworks requirements, and assisting the County with interdiction at the California-Nevada border were included the the District's adopted personnel budget. Funds for non-personnel iteams were included in Fire Fund / Fire Prevention / Travel and Meetings, Account Number 3281506-5100, and included costs for lodging and meals, printing and postage for the postcards, and purchasing six additional No Fireworks banners, all of which was approximately $6,520. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Efforts to reduce the availability, presence, and use of fireworks, along with protecting the North Etiwanda Preserve and the full expanse of the foothills, helps to provide a good quality of life for the City's residents. These efforts likewise promote a safe and healthy community for all, with a particular emphasis on protecting the most vulnerable. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 3 Page 504 4th of July Report Cooperative Efforts • Interdiction and Confiscation * Thwarting Illegal Sales • Community Outreach • Planning and Coordination • Reporting and Enforcement Closures �Gp O� I 5 �yb b 0 W v cc I, r F LL it _ + CD r'r Z ,a D Cie Z Q 1 - n , M1. 1 ,1 i 1 IR ■ 5 I�jJ 5 W wit L LL L L Thwart *ing I 2:014 n11501Ek i• 1:06 -1 all 5GE � ( Rancho Cucamonga Police Depart... Dylan DeThomas Rancho 4& Cucamonga News Group em Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Q *Favorites •25 mins•0 Reminder: ALL FIREWORKS IN RC ARE ILLEGAL! Someone getting busted for selling illegal fireworks! Lowe's1 The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and Rancho Islands Parking lot Cucamonga Fire District are working together to identify subjects selling fireworks in Rancho Cucamonga, If you are nae caught,you will be fined$1000 and your fireworks will be confiscated. It's just not worth it. #RCCommUNITY #vision4safety r ISQuring regular City Hall office hours(Monday-Thursday, '~ - 7 a.m. -6 p.m.)fireworks can be reported to:(909) 477-2770. � s JB If you hear fireworks in your neighborhood over the ■� •- _ a. : .x weekend or after hours,report to: (909)941-1488. T °■ 40 5 Comments 6 Shares [] Like Comment Share Commun *lty FIREWORKSCi. It \ :; ", 2� - . - AREILLEGALIN . . ILEGALES EN RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLfireworks are 1 LLE GhL $1,000 FINE FOR POSSESSION OF FIREWORKS! j UNA MULTA DE$1,OD0 PDR LA POSESILIN DE FUCGOS ARTlFICIALFS. in ancho • FIRE AND POLICE WILL BE PATROLLING YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD THROUGH THE 4TH OF JULY. • THERE IS A$1,000 FINE FOR POSSESSION OR USE OF FIREWORKS. • THE LAW WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED. �OLUCAIy • REPORT ILLEGAL FIREWORKS BY CALLING: fit' V:48A Diy FIRE ADMINISTRATION a1909-477-2770 or co o �� 4 i 9 SHERIFF DISPATCH at 909-941-1488 p•' • eaueEnosr POLKA rAMMuwusuvEcavQarunEsrEaoEruira. FIRE • HAYUNAWATADE$1,AQOPOHLIPOSESI6NOEAIEGOSAR1IFICY4LES. • LA LEYSEW EST7icmwENTE EEEGTivA. _ • • REPORTAN 909-477-2770 o 909-94i-i488. Visit www:0(yofRC us for more inforwaflon about the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE , Community Outreach Vets,, Pets,, • nd Regrets p C�Qfpy ' / / preventable ' m ®qiT_ r Q •v�C / Beurn injuries FIRE Courteous 1 Not Use IllegolFireworks I u� V 1 our Veterans FIRE � �p CUCq,H 1 Not Use Illegol1 V 40 RC Help Keep Our ANIMAL Pets Safe CINTIR D, Not Use Illegal FireworksMore Pets Go Missing on the ALL FIREWORKS R"m��° ARE ILLEGAL 'E in Rancho Cucamonga any day $1,000 Fine REPORT: Office Hours(909)477-2770 for Possession or Use After Hours (909)941-1488 ?G�p C 4& RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT Plann 'ingand C Fire District — Sheriff's Department — DoIT j North e z -- f _ ..sszA. "°"-' _-- � i��•I� - -_Vi M4A - a_ �r�` p PIN � - � N nl °w ��Central -W I IrB.M W _. e.rn. a ... - FoorhOl BItd i a-- .e D O �v. _ Rancho Ranch. South a r Cucamonga ne i svoRs } p Y Comple. '�L Arraw Rte a - Oy 15 •P4 Jersey Blvd Cucamonga x le—emn North Cucamor]a 8th 51 ath 5, 1777Jt 8;1 51 IL •` 7m St 7rn St emPlre Lakes Rochester Report 'ing and E • Patrols July 3rd and 4th • �; �_�-24 Hour Reporting ____________________; I • i ,. �lul:sae as RC2GO App or 4 I,=tle Rd Nplsitls. Rd 1 µd—Ave .roughbretle'• O Chafley s college School /�• \ ea by-5t 8aoyan 5t •�eanyw�st Cor[h Cembn All LJ Lemon Avc ®( J Yirir� yl� Bns�n/•• •\ Alta I--Dr �J !V-1 `lvl•,Sr Grapeland�l • Etiwa n.Aa UGIatM Nn 1 la � U l�.l O - / Coutatry Club ` Base I-8G i 14tb St — _ O _ • .. EOl�/• •R conga Arrow Hwy a�E/_�, E 9th SL >1/ 1 Nor[h jersey Bivtl Keise[ E 8ih St Btn 5[ Cucamonga e 5t \ E]th St —hE hl•... E 4th St •Q h - 6[h St E 5t4 a 5t ••O E d ` nE-1 ..!1*Se •I—x. San BcinarJiirn Avr 1 I • 1 • 1 , a Closures ENTRY PROHIBITED • North Etiwanda Preserve BEYOND THIS POINT Due to High Fire Danger Haven Avenue north of the City Limit • Snowdrop/S a n t i n a Road Archibald Avenue north of the City Limit Snowdrop/Santina Road Exception: Residents and Property Owners North Etiwanda Preserve ROA D i � � � ROAD cLosEo � ROAD CLOSED I :__ - (CLOSED Due to High Fire Danger< CLO$ED g''—in:o, � Fi n—cncamonge Fire Protemnn—t ct San eeor—din.C—Ity F e.e PUDena —t - i//r191/IAW RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT tom• Analys 'is Increase in purchases and use of fireworks nationally and locally. Sales Up At Least 115%; America May Run Out of Fireworks J C � I IT 1J Sales of Fireworks Up 200% in Some Cities Boston — 2,000% increase in fireworks complaints over 2019 LAPD — Fireworks complaints up 170% over 2019 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Reports of Fireworks 3,500 { 2,918 ! 3,000 2,500 'f 2,000 � 1,434 lsoo h - 1,000 • 1! �• 500 Tax 0 2019 2020 RANCHO ;W Future Opportunities • Personal Story Videos for Social Media • Countywide Taskforce for Illegal Sales • Promote Amnesty Program • Technology �. NO FIREWORKS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Olw-- DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering/City Engineer Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Program Supplement Agreement with California Department of Transportation for the Local Roadway Safety Plan and Authorizing the City Manager, or Designee, to Approve and Execute Project Related Documents. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Program Supplement Agreement with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)for the Local Roadway Safety Plan and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to approve and execute project related documents and agreements with Caltrans. BACKGROUND: Federal regulations require that each State develop a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). An SHSP is a statewide data-driven roadway safety plan that coordinates the efforts to reduce traffic related accidents (fatalities and injuries) on all public roadways. While local agencies can reference the SHSP to improve roadway safety, having a Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) for each jurisdiction is more desirable as it addresses targeted traffic safety concerns and challenges. Developing an LRSP establishes a framework to systematically identify and evaluate roadway safety problems and recommend roadway safety improvements. An LRSP in place allows local agencies to prioritize a list of improvements and actions that contributes to the statewide plan. ANALYSIS: In October 2019, Caltrans announced a call for LRSP applications. Funds awarded to applicants were on a "first come first serve" basis eligible for funding up to $72,000 of State funds. On December 3, 2019, Engineering staff applied for funding that will aid in developing a comprehensive LRSP. This LRSP will provide a systemic framework that identifies, analyzes, and prioritizes local roadway safety improvements. The LRSP will present prioritized results that list issues, risks, actions and traffic safety improvements that can reduce accidents on local roadways. Further, as part of the LRSP process, Engineering staff will conduct stakeholder engagement meetings that review the 4E's (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency medical services); collaborate with neighboring agencies to leverage resources; assist in identifying target crash types with proven mitigation measures; and set a timeline for future implementation. Engineering staff will monitor and update the LRSP treating it like a livable document. On January 8, 2020, Caltrans notified Engineering staff that State funds has been awarded to the City to develop an LRSP. As a result, a Program Supplement Agreement (Attachment 2) between Caltrans and Page 505 the City needs to be executed prior to performing any work. Therefore, the City Council would need to adopt a resolution designating authority to the City Manager, or designee, to approve and execute documents and agreements with Caltrans related to the LRSP grant program in order to proceed with the project. FISCAL IMPACT: An estimated cost of $80,000 is anticipated to develop the LRSP. Caltrans has awarded an amount of $72,000 of reimbursable funding with a City local match of $8,000. Engineering staff will request an appropriation at the time of contract award with a future design consultant. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the development of prioritized roadway safety improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution No. 2020-XXX Attachment 2 — Program Supplement Agreement Page 2 Page 506 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. V05 TO THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY- STATE AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT NO. LRSPL-5420(024) BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (LRSP) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to "Administering Agency"), has for its consideration and execution the Program Supplement No. V05 to the Administering Agency-State Agreement for Project No. LRSPL-5420(024) authorizing payment of State funds for the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP); and WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Transportation, (hereinafter referred to as "State") processes and monitors State funded projects; and WHEREAS, as a condition to payment of State funds for said projects, the Administering Agency shall approve and execute said Supplement No. V05. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, to the following: 1. Authorize the Execution of Program Supplement No. V05 to the Administering Agency- State Agreement for Project No. LRSPL-5420(024) for payment of State funds for the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). 2. To authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign said Program Supplement and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution, as well as type in the Resolution Number and Date in the said Program Supplement and for the return of the originals copies of said Program Supplement to the State of California Department of Transportation along with the certified copy of this Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Administering Agency shall also comply with the "Special Covenants or Remarks" attached to said Program Supplement, including: 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and reimbursement are available only upon the passage of the State Budget Act containing these STATE funds. 2. Any State and Federal funds that may have been encumbered for this project are available for disbursement for limited periods of time. For each fund encumbrance the limited period is from the start of the fiscal year that the specific fund was appropriated within the State Budget Act to the applicable fund Reversion Date shown on the State approved project finance letter. Per Government Code Section 16304, all project funds not liquated within these periods will revert unless an executed Cooperative Work Resolution No. 2020-XXX— Page 1 of 1 Page 507 ATTACHMENT 1 Agreement extending these dates is requested by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance. ADMINSTERING AGENCY should ensure that invoices are submitted to the District Local Assistance Engineer at least 75 days prior to the applicable fund Reversion Date to avoid the lapse of applicable funds. Pursuant to a directive from the State Controller's Office and the Department of Finance; in order for payment to be made, the last date the District Local Assistance Engineer can forward an invoice for payment to the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office for reimbursable work for funds that are going to revert at the end of a particular fiscal year is May 15t" of the particular fiscal year. Notwithstanding the unliquidated sums of project specific State and Federal funding remaining and available to fund project work, and invoice for reimbursement involving applicable funds that is not received by the Department's Local Program Accounting Office at least 45 days prior to the applicable fixed fund Reversion Date will not be paid. These unexpended funds will be irrevocably reverted by the Department's Division of Accounting on the applicable fund Reversion Date. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with the requirements in 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (applicable to Federal and State Funded Projects). 4. This PROJECT is funded with State-Only funding from the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Program. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to develop an LRSP under this PROJECT. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to follow all relevant State laws and requirements including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This PSA allows reimbursement of eligible PROJECT expenditures to the ADMINSTERTING AGENCY for which the LRSP State funds are allocated. The effective State allocation date established the eligibility date for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to start reimbursement work. Any work performed prior to the effective allocation date is not eligible for reimbursement from the LRSP funds. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that the LRSP funds available for reimbursement will be limited to the amount allocated and encumbered by the STATE consistent with the scope of work in the STATE approved application. Funds encumbered may not be used for a modified scope of work after a project is awarded unless approved by the Statewide LRSP Coordinator prior to performing work. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to the program delivery and reporting requirements. The study and the LRSP must be completed within thirty-six(36)months of the funding allocation. The Final Report of Expenditure, the final invoice and the LRSP report must be submitted to the DLAE within six (6) months of the report completion. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August 2020. Resolution No. 2020-XXX— Page 1 of 1 Page 508 PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. V05 Adv Project ID Date: July 27, 2020 to 0820000164 Location: 08-SBD-0-RCUC ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT Project Number: LRSPL-5420(024) FOR STATE FUNDED PROJECTS NO 00229S E.A. Number: Locode: 5420 "this Program Supplement, effective 07/01/o9, hereby adopts and incorporates into the Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 00229S for State Funded Projects which was entered into between the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and the STATE with an effective date of 07/01/09 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT is executed in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY on (See copy attached). The ADMINISTERING AGENCY further stipulates that as a condition to the payment by the State of any funds derived from sources noted below encumbered to this project,Administering Agency accepts and will comply with the Special Covenants and remarks set forth on the following pages. PROJECT LOCATION: Throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga TYPE OF WORK: Local road safety plan (LRSP) Estimated Cost State Funds Matching Funds STATE $72,000.00 LOCAL. OTHER $80,000.00 $8,000.00 $0.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By By Title Chief, Office of Project Implementation Division of Local Assistance Date Attest Date I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance: lb 1 Accounting Officer �a�5,gyn ne. e/147s Date 7J�1/ ��d $72.000,00 Program Supplement 00-229S-V05-SERIAL Page 1 of 3 Page 509 08-SBD-0-RCUC LRSPL-5420(024) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and reimbursement are available only upon the passage of the State Budget Act containing these STATE funds. 2. Any State and Federal funds that may have been encumbered for this project are available for disbursement for limited periods of time. For each fund encumbrance the limited period is from the start of the fiscal year that the specific fund was appropriated within the State Budget Act to the applicable fund Reversion Date shown on the State approved project finance letter. Per Government Code Section 16304, all project funds not liquidated within these periods will revert unless an executed Cooperative Work Agreement extending these dates is requested by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance. ADMINISTERING AGENCY should ensure that invoices are submitted to the District Local Assistance Engineer at least 75 days prior to the applicable fund Reversion Date to avoid the lapse of applicable funds. Pursuant to a directive from the State Controller's Office and the Department of Finance; in order for payment to be made, the last date the District Local Assistance Engineer can forward an invoice for payment to the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office for reimbursable work for funds that are going to revert at the end of a particular fiscal year is May 15th of the particular fiscal year. Notwithstanding the unliquidated sums of project specific State and Federal funding remaining and available to fund project work, any invoice for reimbursement involving applicable funds that is not received by the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office at least 45 days prior to the applicable fixed fund Reversion Date will not be paid. These unexpended funds will be irrevocably reverted by the Department's Division of Accounting on the applicable fund Reversion Date. 3. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with the requirements in 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (applicable to Federal and State Funded Projects). 4. This PROJECT is funded with State-Only funding from the Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Program. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to develop an LRSP under this PROJECT. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to follow all relevant State laws and requirements including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This PSA allows reimbursement of eligible PROJECT expenditures to the ADMINISTERING AGENCY for which the LRSP State funds are allocated. The effective State allocation date establishes the eligibility date for the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to start reimbursable work. Any work performed prior the effective allocation date is not eligible for reimbursement from the LRSP funds. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that LRSP funds available for reimbursement will be Program Supplement 00-229S-V05-SERIAL P?g%WA of 3 08-SBD-0-RCUC LRSPL-5420(024) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS limited to the amount allocated and encumbered by the STATE consistent with the scope of work in the STATE approved application. Funds encumbered may not be used for a modified scope of work after a project is awarded unless approved by the Statewide LRSP Coordinator prior to performing work. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to the program delivery and reporting requirements. The study and the LRSP must be completed within thirty-six (36) months of the funding allocation. The Final Report of Expenditure, the final invoice and the LRSP report must be submitted to the DLAE within six (6) months of the report completion. Program Supplement 00-229S-V05-SERIAL pf wl of 3 Olt, i I DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Justine Garcia, Interim Deputy Director of Engineering Services Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Fiscal Year 2020/21 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant for the Healthy RC Active Transportation Infrastructure Assessment and Improvement Plan and Authorizing the City Manager, or Designee, to Approve and Execute Related Documents. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to adopt California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Fiscal Year 2020/21 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant for the Healthy RC Active Transportation Infrastructure Assessment and Improvement Plan and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve and execute related documents and agreements with Caltrans. BACKGROUND: The Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program was created to support the Caltrans mission of providing a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability. This grant is primarily funded through Senate Bill (SB) 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 which has designated approximately $25 million in SB1 funds for Sustainable Communities Grants available for the Fiscal Year 2020/21 grant cycle. Eligible planning projects are expected to directly benefit the multi-modal transportation system as well as improve public health, social equity, environmental justice, and provide important community benefits. ANALYSIS: In October 2019, City staff submitted a competitive grant application, titled Healthy RC Active Transportation Infrastructure Assessment and Improvement Plan, for the Fiscal Year 2020/21 Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program. The object of this plan is to assess current infrastructure, identify improvements and new infrastructure, and provide a prioritized list of projects covering areas within a two- mile radius of 23 public elementary schools, 8 public middle schools and 4 public high schools. This plan will result in specifically identified project tear sheets to identify shovel ready projects for use in applying for future grant opportunities such as the Caltrans Active Transportation Program (ATP), and capital improvement budget planning. This opportunity will provide a comprehensive short and long-term plan to fill gaps in the City's sidewalk network, and increase and improve bicycle infrastructure to provide connectivity between neighborhoods, schools, and municipal facilities. On June 18, 2020, City staff received a letter from Caltrans indicating that the City's grant application was 1 of 77 (out of 178 submitted statewide) to be selected for a grant award. It is anticipated that the development of the Healthy RC Active Transportation Infrastructure Assessment and Improvement Plan will begin in November 2020. The proposed scope of work includes soliciting a request for proposal to obtain a consultant, data collection and field work, comprehensive public outreach including workshop meetings with various school districts and advisory groups, a social media campaign, and bicycle and walk audits (as is permitted by county health guidelines), and a draft and final comprehensive plan document. The proposed plan must be completed before February 2023. Page 512 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT Consideration of a Resolution with the California Department of Transportation for the Healthy RC Active Transportation Infrastructure Assessment and Improvement Plan and Authorize the City Manager to Approve and Execute Related Documents with Caltrans. MEETING DATE August 19, 2020 An agreement between Caltrans and the City needs to be executed prior to performing any work. Therefore, the City Council will need to adopt a resolution that designates authority to the City Manager, or designee, to approve and execute related documents and agreements with Caltrans in order to proceed with the project. FISCAL IMPACT: An estimated cost of $400,000 is anticipated to complete the Healthy RC Active Transportation Infrastructure Assessment and Improvement Plan. Caltrans has awarded an amount of$354,116 (88.53%) of reimbursable funding with a City local match of$45,884 (11.47%). City staff will request an appropriation at the time of contract award with a future design consultant. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the development of active transportation infrastructure improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution No. 2020-XXX Page 2 Page 513 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ADOPTING THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT FOR THE HEALTHY RC ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO APPROVE AND EXECUTE PROJECT RELATED DOCUMENTS AND AGREEMENTS WITH CALTRANS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is eligible to receive Federal and/or State funding for certain transportation planning related plans, through the California Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, a Restricted Grant Agreement is needed to be executed with the California Department of Transportation before such funds can be claimed through the Transportation Planning Grant Programs; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to delegate authorization to execute these agreements and any amendments thereto; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to approve and execute all Restricted Grant Agreements and any amendments thereto with the California Department of Transportation. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August 2020. Resolution No. 2020-XXX— Page 1 of 1 Page 514 City of Rancho Cucamonga CALTRANS GRANT AWARDS FOR LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Justine Garcia, Interim Deputy Director of Engineering Services Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Services Department August 19, 2020 Programs pF TRgN�A 0'�a Local Roadway Safety Plan �� Y Y o 0 • Targets Safety Concerns Q • "First Come First Serve" Basis �, •Q • State Funding Fa w sTArEs of • Sustainable Transportation Planning %G CAI • Multimodal Enhancements S Bi • Shortlist (1 of 77) • State Funding At Projects • Local Roadway Safety Plan I TD • Systemic Framework • Examine the 4E's SAFETY • Prioritizes List of Improvements b • Sustainable Transportation Planning • Evaluates Current Infrastructure • Conduct Bike and Walk Audits • Project Tear Sheets � �� Benefits • Local Roadway Safety Plan • Reduce Accidents \' • Living Document 4.: • Sustainable Transportation Planning • Shovel Ready Projects _ • Future Grant Opportunities CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recommendations • Staff Recommends the City Council Adopt Resolutions with Caltrans for the Local Roadway Safety Plan ( LRSP) and Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Awards and Authorize the City Manager, or Designee, to Approve and Execute Related Documents. Questions ? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Olw-- DATE: August 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director SUBJECT: Consideration of Appointment of Unopposed Candidates to City Offices (City Clerk and City Treasurer) and Cancelling the Portion of the November 3, 2020, City Election for those Positions. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council has the following options to consider in this matter: 1. Adopt Resolution providing for the appointment of the lone nominated individuals to the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer and cancelling the election for those offices that was to be held on November 3, 2020, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10229. (Staffs Recommendation) 2. Take no action, with the result that the election for the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer will proceed to be held on November 3, 2020. BACKGROUND: The City's General Municipal Election is to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020. Scheduled for the ballot at this election are the City Council seats for District 1 and District 4, City Clerk, and City Treasurer. The City Clerk and City Treasurer seats are elected city-wide. No ballot measures qualified for the election. As of the close of business on Friday, August 7, 2020, the deadline for filing nomination papers, only one candidate for each of the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer had filed. The persons nominated are Janice C. Reynolds for City Clerk and Jim Harrington for City Treasurer. Janice C. Reynolds is the incumbent having been elected by Rancho Cucamonga voters as City Clerk in 2008, 2012, and again in 2016. Jim Harrington was recently appointed City Treasurer, replacing long time City Treasurer Jim Frost. Their nomination papers were deemed to be complete and sufficient. ANALYSIS: Elections Code Section 10229 provides that if by the statutory nomination filing deadline, there are not a greater number of candidates than offices to be elected, and if there are also no qualified ballot measures or more than one person has been nominated to another citywide office, then the City Clerk shall certify these facts to the City Council (Attachment 1), publish a notice of the same, and after the fifth day after such publication, the Council may take one of three courses of action: 1. The Council may appoint to the office the person who has been nominated; 2. The Council may appoint to the office any eligible voter if no one has been nominated (not applicable in this situation); or 3. The Council may determine to hold the election if either no one or only one person has been nominated. Page 515 The primary purpose of holding an election where one person has been nominated for each office would be to allow for the possibility of a write-in candidate winning the seat(s), which is a very rare occurrence. As required by the Elections Code, the City Clerk caused to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in Rancho Cucamonga, (the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin) on August 13, 2020, a public notice titled "Notice that There are Not More Candidates than Offices to be Elected" providing the facts set forth herein and notifying of the Council's authority to either appoint the nominated candidates and cancel the election for those seats, or not. Therefore, the Council has the option to appoint the nominated candidates to those offices and to cancel the City's election for these positions only. Staff recommends this action and has prepared an appropriate Resolution (Attachment 2). Although the Council could choose to hold the election for these two seats, staff does not recommend this action since it will result in the City unnecessarily incurring significant election costs of approximately $350,000 - $400,000. If the Council appoints the incumbent candidates to the open offices, those appointees will serve in office exactly as if they had been elected, starting their new term in December 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The cancellation of the election for the seats of City Clerk and City Treasurer will result in savings in supplies, services, and personnel costs of between $350,000 - $400,000 of the total election cost budgeted for the November 3, 2020, municipal election. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOALS ADDRESSED: Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Certification that there are not more Candidates than Offices to be Elected Attachment 2 — Resolution Page 2 Page 516 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �l CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATION THAT THERE ARE NOT MORE CANDIDATES THAN OFFICES TO BE ELECTED I, Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify pursuant to Section 10229, Elections Code of the State of California, to the following facts relating to the General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2020. As of the close of the nomination period on August 7, 2020, there are not more candidates than offices to be elected for the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer. The person so nominated are: For City Clerk: Janice C. Reynolds For City Treasurer: Jim Harrington That § 10229 of the Elections Code allows one of the following courses of action to be taken by the City Council: 1. Appoint to the office the persons who have been nominated. 2. Appoint to the office any eligible voter if no one has been nominated. 3. Hold the election if either no one or only one person has been nominated. A notice of these facts will be published on August 13, 2020, in a newspaper of general circulation in the city pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. After the fifth day following the date of publication, the City Council will meet to either make the appointments or direct an election to be held. The person(s) appointed, if any, shall qualify and take office and serve exactly as if elected at a municipal election for the office. If by the 75t" day before the municipal election, no person has been appointed to the office(s) pursuant to (1) or (2) above, the election for those seats shall be held. If the City Council makes an appointment pursuant to § 10229, Elections Code, the City Clerk shall not accept for filing any statement of write-in candidacy which is submitted after the appointment is made. 1 Li?ATroyan, MMC ices Director A0 Page 517 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LONE NOMINATED INDIVIDUALS TO THE OFFICES OF CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER AND CANCELLING THE ELECTION FOR THOSE OFFICES THAT WAS TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2020, PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 10229 WHEREAS, a municipal election is scheduled for Tuesday, November 3, 2020, to fill the offices of City Treasurer and City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City Clerk gave notice of the election for these offices on June 18, 2020. WHEREAS, the nomination period for said offices of City Treasurer and City Clerk began on July 13, 2020 and ended on August 7, 2020. WHEREAS, as of August 7, 2020, only one person had been nominated for each of the offices of City Treasurer and City Clerk. WHEREAS, the City Clerk has submitted a certification of the above facts to the City Council. WHEREAS, pursuant to § 10229 of the Elections Code of the State of California, as of the close of the nomination period on August 7, 2009, there are not more candidates than offices to be elected and that§ 10229 of the Elections Code allows one of the following courses of action to be taken by the City Council: 1. Appoint to the office the person who has been nominated. 2. Appoint to the office any eligible voter if no one has been nominated. 3. Hold the election if either no one or only one person has been nominated. WHEREAS, a notice was published on August 13, 2020 in a newspaper of general circulation pursuant to law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. That pursuant to § 10229 of the Elections Code of the State of California, the following action is being taken: The following persons are hereby appointed to the offices to which they were nominated: NAME OFFICE TERM Janice C. Reynolds City Clerk 4 years Jim Harrington City Treasurer 4 years Resolution No. 2020-XXX— Page 1 of 2 Page 518 Section 3. The election scheduled to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020 for the offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer only is hereby canceled. Section 4. The persons appointed shall qualify and take office and serve exactly as if elected at a municipal election for the office. Section 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 2020. Resolution No. 2020-XXX— Page 1 of 2 Page 519