HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-217 - ResolutionsRESOLUTION NO. 86-217
A RESOLUTION OF THg CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE
HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ADVISORy ELECTION TO BE CON-
SOLIDATED HITE TEE CITY'S GI~ERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1986, SUBMITTING A PROPOSITION
TO THE VOTERS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCERNING THE
COUNTY PRE-TRIAL D~.T~NTION FACILITY; AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF
ITS MEMBERS TO FILE A HRITTRN A~UMRNT R~n. ARDiNG A CITY MEA-
SURE; DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNE"~ TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL
ANALYSIS; AND PROVIDING POR TEE FILING OF R~BUTTAL AR~UMRNTS
WSEREAS, the City Council desires Co know the will of the Populace in
regard to the County Pre-trial Detention Facility.
NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancbo Cucamonga, Cal-
ifornia, does hereby resolve, declare, de=ermine and order as follows:
SECTION 1: That pursuant to the requirements of ~be laws of the State
of California relating to general law cities witbin said state, there shall be,
and ~bere is hereby called and ordered held in the City of Rancho Cucasonga,
County of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the fourth (4tb) day
of November, 1986, a special municipal advisory election for the Purpose of
submitting the following question to the voters of the City of Rancbo
Cucasonga, California, to-wit:
"Advisory Vote Only: Are you in
favor of the construction and oper-
ation of a San Bernardino County YES
Pre-Trial Detention Facility Type
II on Foothill Boulevard east of
Haven Avenue adjacent to the County NO
Law and Justice Center in ~he City
of Rancho Cucamonga?"
SECTION 2: Tha~ the special municipal advisory election hereby called for
the da~e hereinabove specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with
the City's General Municipal Election to be held on said da~e which has been
consolidated with the SCatside General Election.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVES that pursuant to Sections 4015.5 and 5014.5 of
the Elections Code of the State of California, the city council, by majority
vote, authorizes the provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments
for the November 4, 1986 election and then shall be repealed. All previous
resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal arEumen~s for city measures
are repealed; and
FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, that if any person submits an argument
aZainst a city measure, and an argument has been filed in favor of the city
measure, the city clerk shall immediately send copies of that arEumen~ to the
persons filinE the argusent in favor of the city measure. The persons filing
the argument in favor of the city measure may Prepare and submit a rebuttal ar-
gument not exceeding 250 words. The city clerk shall send copies of the argu-
men~ in favor of the measure to ~he Persons filing the argument against the
city measure, who msy prepare and submi~ s rebuttal srgument to the argument in
favor of the city measure not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal arguments
shall be filed with the city clerk not sore than 10 days after the final date
Resolution No 86-21
Page 2 · 7
fo.r filin.g direct arguments, or August 15, 1986.
:~.7~e~m~:i the .ame m--net .. the direcEebuttal 'rguments
.rely follo, the direct argu.~..'~g:m:nt': each rebutt.1
hzch zt seeks to rebut.
PASSED, APPRO~ED, and ADOPTED this 16 th day of July, l 986
AYES: King, Dabl, Wright '
NOES: MikeIs, auquet
ASSIT: None
shall be
argument
ut · e , x y Clerk
I, B~E!tLy A. AUTHMZ, ET, CITY CLEIC of the City of Rancbo Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution ~as duly Passed,
aPProved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal-
ifornia, at s regular meeting of said City Council bald on the 16th day of
July, 1986.
Executed this 17tb day of July, 1986 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Be