Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002/01/02 - Agenda Packet
OITYE RANCH ONGA City Office: (00~) 47~27(~0 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS: 1sT and 3rd Wednesdays, 7:00 p.m. January2,2002 A~encv, Board & City Council Members William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane ............................... Member James V. Curatalo ................... Member Bob Dutton .............................. Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. Closed Session .................................. Tapia Conference Room Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting ...... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ......................Council Chambers City Council Agenda January 2, 2002 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Alexander Biane __, Curatalo Dutton , and Williams__ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Certificate of Appreciation to the City by the San Bernardino County Safety Employees' Association for the support in aiding fundraising efforts for Firefighting and Law Enforcement heroes of New York City. 2. Presentation of FDNY Thank You America Bike Tour. C_~ COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: November 7, 2001 November 21, 2001 December 5, 2001 (Curatalo absent) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/5/01 and 12/12/01 and Payroll ending 12/2/01 for the total amount of $2,413,816.29. 3. Approve to receive and file current investment Schedule as of November 30, 2001. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation from Lion Street to Hellman Avenue, to be funded from Account No. 11763035650/1100176 (Measure I). 1 21 27 City Council Agenda January 2, 2002 2 RESOLUTION NO. 02-001 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM LION STREET TO HELLMAN AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to summarily vacate an easement for streets, highways and related purposes along the east side of Hermosa Avenue between 5th Street and 6th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 02-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND RELATED PURPOSES ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN 5TM STREET AND 6TM STREET Approval of authorization for the purchase of one (1) Ingersoll-Rand DD30 Self-propelled Double Vibratory Asphalt Compactor and Trailer from Ingersoll-Rand Equipment, of Irwindale, in the amount of $36,957.15, funded from Fund 1712-001-5603. Approval of authorization for the purchase of one (1) Ford F-350 Dual Rear Wheel Super Duty Crew Cab Stake Bed Truck from Sunrise Ford, of Fontana, in the amount of $35,809.33, funded from Fund 1134-303- 5604. Approval of authorization for the purchase of one (1) John Deere 5220 utility tractor from AA Equipment Rentals Co., Inc., of Montclair, in the amount of $25,877.40, funded from fund 1712-001-5604. Approval of a Resolution supporting the passage of Proposition 42 - Traffic Congestion Improvement Act. RESOLUTION NO. 02-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 42 - TRAFFIC CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT 34 36 41 42 43 44 51 City Council Agenda January 2, 2002 3 10. Approval to adopt the Resolution approving records retention schedules for Purchasing, Engineering, RDA Finance, RCCF Finance and Fire Finance and minor revisions to Library and Facilities Maintenance. RESOLUTION NO. 02~004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS 11. Approval of Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688 - Daniel and Gina Shackelford - Application to designate the Dorothy Finley House and property as a Historic Landmark, located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive - APN: 207-081-24. Related file: Mills Act Agreement DRC2001-00727. RESOLUTION NO. 02-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2001-00688, DESIGNATING THE DOROTHY FINELY HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 7920 VALLE VISTA DRIVE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-081-24 12. 13. Approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2001-00727 (CO 02-001 ) - Daniel and Gina Shackelford - Request to reduce property tax on the Dorothy Finley House and property, a Historic Landmark, located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive - APN: 207-081-24. Related file: Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 02-002) releasing Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 15268 for DR 00-24, located at the northeast corner of Elm Avenue and White Birch Drive, submitted by Darrell D. Clendenen. RESOLUTION NO. 02-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DR 00-24 RESOLUTION NO. 02-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DARRELL D. CLENDENEN 53 54 78 80 78 98 101 102 City Council Agenda January 2, 2002 4 14. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and release of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 02-003) releasing Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 15268 for DR 00- 25, located at the north side of White Birch Drive, east of Elm Avenue, submitted by Stefan A. Smith. RESOLUTION NO. 02-008 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DR 00-25 RESOLUTION NO. 02-009 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEFAN A. SMITH 15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map 15529, and acceptance of Offer of Dedication for street purposes on Pilgrims Court, located at the Southern Terminus of Pilgrims Court, south of 19th Street, submitted by Fred A. Nelson, Jr. and Urai S. Nelson. RESOLUTION NO. 02-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 15529, iMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 02-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION ON PILGRIMS COURT AS OFFERED FOR STREET AND RELATED PURPOSES RESOLUTION NO. 02-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15529 103 106 107 108 111 112 113 City Council Agenda January 2, 2002 5 16. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit, Disposition of City-owned property adjacent to Garcia Drive and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District, No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract Map 16181, and located at the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Garcia Drive, submitted by SRG/Camreal, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 02-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16181, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTIQN NO. 02-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS A~q-ACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED HEREIN RESOLUTION NO. 02-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16181 17. Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 02-004) from Vic Chen and Lois Chen for DR 00-08, located on the northwest corner of 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenue, submitted by Vic Chen, a Developer. 121 124 125 130 138 City Council Agenda ~ January 2, 2002 6 RESOLUTION NO. 02-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM V~C CHEN AND LOIS CHEN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME (APN: 229- 331-07), FOR DR 00-08 18. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extensions for Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2, located on Etiwanda Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and Miller, submitted by RC Homes, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 02-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND 15711-2 19. Approval to accept Improvements, release for Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for CUP 97-09, submitted by Bear Gulch, LLC, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. RESOLUTION NO. 02-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-09 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for MDR 97-19, submitted by W9/WLA Real Estate Limited Partnership, located at 10900 Fourth Street. RESOLUTION NO. 02-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 97-19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 139 141 143 145 147 148 150 City Council Agenda January 2, 2002 7 21. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 15531, submitted by Overland RC 29, LLC, located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Mayberry Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 02-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15531 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 22. Approval of release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. B12296250 in the amount of $12,256.64, for the ADA 1999/2000 Access Ramp and Drive Approach Improvements at various locations along Hermosa Avenue, Haven Avenue, 6th Street and Arrow Route, Contract No. 00- 016. 23. Approval to accept the Construction of 6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 00- 063 as complete, release the bonds, authorize the City Manager to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $158,775.31. RESOLUTION NO. 02-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 6TM STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 00-063, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 24. Approval to accept the Construction of the East Avenue and Victoria Street Improvements, Contract No. 00-035 as complete, release the bonds, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $533,370.09. RESOLUTION NO. 02-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE EAST AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 00-035, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 151 153 154 156 158 159 161 City Council Agenda January 2, 2002 8 E~ CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act them upon at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F~ ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 00-286 RESOLUTION NO. 02-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 00-256 G.~. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following requirements. testimony. items have no legal publication or posting The Chair will open the meeting to receive public No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. 162 163 City Council Agenda January 2, 2002 9 I_. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST RESOLUTION NO. 02-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST J~ IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K.~. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L~ ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 27, 2001, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. 213 220 November 7, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetin~l A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 7, 2001 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:29 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Diane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst IIh Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst Ill; Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer; Brad Duller, City Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Pete Ortiz, Police Department; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Britt Wilson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of Highlights from the October 2® Rancho Cucamonga Remembers... Tribute. Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent, gave a power point presentation of the event. B2. Presentation of Proclamations to Donors and Sponsors of the October 2'~ Rancho Cucamonga Remembers. Mayor Alexander with the assistance of Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ill, presented Proclamations to the sponsors of the event. Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II, presented a video of this event. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of Geography Awareness Week, November 12 through 17, and proclaiming November 14, 2001, as National Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Day. Mayor Alexander presented a Proclamation to Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, and Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor. Larry Temple Administrative Services Director, talked about what they would be doing for GIS Week. B4. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Cucamonga District Host Lions Club in recognition of the "White Cane Days" gift of sight fundraising event for November 2001. Mayor Alexander presented a Proclamation to Lion President Norm MacKenzie. City Council Minutes November 7, 2001 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Jim Frost wanted to remind the Council about the Veterans Day Ceremony in front of Alta Loma High School. He also reminded everyone of the attack on Pearl Harbor and the memorial that is being built in Washington, D.C. C2. A student from Cai State San Bernardino brought up the Central Park election and felt with the decrease in the interest rates the City could afford to build it. He felt it should be built in stages. D. CONSENTCALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: October 17, 2001 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/10/01, 10/17/01 and 10/24/01 and Payroll ending 10/11/01 and 10/25/01 for the total amount of $4,203,103.78. D3. Approval of a change authorization to IBM Corporation professional services agreement CFTGPFG/CBXGJ for the provision of firewall consulting assistance in the amount of $28,000 from Account Number 1001-209-5300. D4. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the General City Master Plan for FY 2000/2001 and appropriate $675,892.00 for Fund 1112303-5650. D5. Approval of a Resolution of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, certifying that the City of Rancho Cucamonga has the resources to fund the projects submitted for inclusion in the FY 2000/02 - 2007/2008 Transportation Improvement Program and affirming its commitment to implement all of the projects submitted in the program. RESOLUTION NO. 01-240 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, THAT THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HAS THE RESOURCES TO FUND THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED FOR INCLUSION IN THE FY 2001/02 - 2007/2008 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AFFIRMING ITS COMMITMENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL OF THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED IN THE PROGRAM D6. Approval and execution of Program Supplement No. 004-M to the Administering Agency-State Agreement for the Federal-Aid Projects No. 08-5420 for the Section 130 Grade Crossing Improvement Program between the City Of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California, for upgrading railroad protection devices at the Etiwanda Avenue Crossing, Puc No. 101sg-44.1 City Council Minutes November 7, 2001 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 01-241 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM©NGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 004-M TO THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5420 FOR THE SECTION 130 GRADE CROSSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR UPGRADING RAILROAD PROTECTION DEVICES AT THE ETIWANDA AVENUE CROSSING, PUC NO. 101SG-44.1 D7. Approval of a Resolution adopting the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 2001/02 through 2005/06 and Twenty-Year Transportation Plan beginning in fiscal year 2001/02 as required for Measure "1" Funds. RESOLUTION NO. 01-242 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2001/02 THROUGH 2005/06 AND TWENTY-YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN BEGINNING IN FISCAL YEAR 2001/02 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "1" FUNDS D8. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for PM 15579 (CUP 00-34) located th on the north side of 4 Street between Buffalo Avenue and the 1-15 freeway ramps, submitted by Costco Wholesale Corporation, as successor by merger to the Price Company. RESOLUTION NO. 01-243 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PM 15579 (CUP 00-34) D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for the installation of storm drain facilities on Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 15536, located on the south side of 5~h Street, west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by Fairway Palms, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. RESOLUTION NO. 01-244 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES ON PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 15536 D10. Award contract for purchasing computer hardware for the Citywide network operating system and contents servers to Unitek Technology Inc. (CO 01-091) in the amount of $49,000 from account number 17140015605. City Council Minutes November 7, 2001 Page 4 D11. Approval to enter into a contract (CO 01-092) with AEF Systems Consulting, Inc. in the amount of $41,400 to provide continuing contract administration services for the Tidemark Permitting Software and Professional Services to prepare the City for future E-Government options; and authorization to appropriate $41,400 out of prior year reserves into account number 1001301-5300 to provide funding for this contract. D12. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of $108,516.10 ($98,651.00 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, J. McLoughlin Engineering Co., Inc. (CO 01-093), for the Construction of the FY 2001/2002 Bus Bay Improvements at various locations, to be funded from Air Quality and Pedestrian GrantJLocal Transportation Article 3 Funds, Account No. 11052085650/1238105-0 and 12143035650/1293214-0. D13. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DR 99-15, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation, located south of Foothill Boulevard on the east side of Milliken Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 01-245 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-15 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D14. Approval to accept the Construction of Lemon Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street, Contract No. 01-039 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approval the final Contract amount of $103,594.31. RESOLUTION NO. 01-246 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LEMON AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO BERYL STREET, CONTRACT NO. 01-039 AS COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D15. Approval to accept the Construction of the Amethyst Avenue Street and Storm Drain Improvements from 300 feet north of Roberds Court to 450 feet north, Contract No. 01-045 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $89,688.00. RESOLUTION NO. 01-247 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE AMETHYST AVENUE STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM 300 FEET NORTH OF ROBERDS COURT TO 450 FEET NORTH, CONTRACT NO. 01-045 AS COMPLETE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CQMPLETIQN FOR THE WORK D16. Approval to accept the Construction of the 1999/2000 FY Local Street Rehabilitation, Overlay, Contract No. 00-018, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $151,510.99. City Council Minutes November 7, 2001 Page $ RESOLUTION NO. 01-248 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 1999/2000 FY LOCAL STREET REHABILITATION, OVERLAY, CONTRACT NO. 00-018 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D17. Approval to accept the Construction of the North Etiwanda Security Wall between South Termini of Stephens Place and Koch Place, Contract Ne. 01-046 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $36,578.00. RESOLUTION NO. 01-249 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE NORTH ETIWANDA SECURITY WALL BETWEEN SOUTH TERMINI OF STEPHENS PLACE AND KOCH PLACE, CONTRACT NO. 01-046 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02 - RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC - A request to modify certain sections of the Development Agreement regarding the timing of construction of specific infrastructure improvements before issuance of certain building permits for property generally located north of Interstate 210, between Hanley Avenue and Day Creek Channel - Tentative Tract Maps 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, and 15902. ORDINANCE NO. 671 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 00-02, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC, FOR THE PURPOSE OF MODIFYING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING THE TIMING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF SPECIFIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF INTERSTATE 210, EAST OF HANLEY AVENUE AND WEST OF DAY CREEK CHANNEL - TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 14493 THROUGH 14498, 14522, 14523, 15838, AND 15902 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance Ne. 671. E2. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00505 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Very Low Residential District lot development standards, and to amend the Hillside Development grading standards, to facilitate horse keeping. City Council Minutes November 7, 2001 Page 6 CONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- A request to amend the Very Low and Estate Residential Districts lot basic development standards to facilitate horse keeping. Related File: Development Code Amendment DRC2001-00505. ORDINANCE NO. 672 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2001-00505, AMENDING LOT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PERTAINING TO HORSE KEEPING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 673 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2001-00549, AMENDING LOT BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, PERTAINING TO HORSE KEEPING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 672 and 673. MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos. 671,672 and 673. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS Gl. FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 FOR TRACTS 14496, 14496- 1, 14495, 14523, 14523-1, 14494-1, 14493-1, 14522, 14498, 14497, 15838 AND 15902, LOCATED NORTH OF STATE ROUTE 30 BETWEEN DAY CREEK, CHANNEL AND HANLEY AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO ETIWANDA 685, LLC (CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 3, 2001) Staff report presented by Robert Lemon, Assistant Engineer. Councilmember Dutton clarified that the property owner asked for this. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. He asked the City Clerk to open the ballot. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, stated the owner of record for all parcels listed have voted yes in favor of the annual assessment within Landscape Maintenance District No. 10. City Council Minutes November 7, 2001 Page ? RESOLUTION NO. 01-224 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, ORDERING THE FORMATION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10, AND THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 AND CONFIRMING DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 15 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND AS PROVIDED BY ARTICLE XIII D OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 01-224. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. G2. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.24.060 PERTAINING TO FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 555A. ORDINANCE NO. 555A (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PERMITS, AND REVISING CHAPTER 9.24 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 555A for the November 21,2001 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. APPROVAL OF RELINQUISHMENT OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AB A STATE HIGHWAY FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff report presented by Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer. Councilmember Biane inquired about the City being paid for taking this over. Jori Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, stated that would be part of the negotiations with Caltrans. Councilmember Williams asked if after the negotiations were done would that come back to the Council for approval of the Agreement. Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer, stated yes. City Council Minutes November 7, 2001 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 01-250 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) AND THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (CTC) INITIATE ACTIONS TO RELINQUISH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD (STATE ROUTE 66) TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 01-250. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. CONSIDERATION OF REAPPOINTING PAULA PACHON TO THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION FOR A THREE YEAR TERM Jack Lam, City Manager, gave a brief report. MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to reappoint Paula Pachon to the Library Foundation. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. John Lyons talked about the election that took place yesterday and indicated his polling place was hard to find because of poor signage and that there was no parking. Councilmember Williams asked if the City Clerk could look into this with the Registrar of Voters. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, stated she would call and write a letter to the ROV indicating Mr. Lyons concerns. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTOIN: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to recess to complete closed session and then to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:31 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk November 21,2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 21, 2001 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Grace Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II1: Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Pete Ortiz, Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Britt Wilson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Ceremonial Check Presentation by State Senator Nell Soto for funding towards new Senior Center. Mayor Alexander talked about what Senator Soto has done for the City and her commitment to all cities. Senator Soto presented the City with a check in the amount of $65,000 and talked about how the budget is done for the state. She talked about the "wish list" process cities go through to get various funding for things. She stated due to the redistricting she would not be representing Rancho Cucamonga. B2. Presentation on the Success of the 2001 Harvest Tuesdays Program. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, talked about the program that took place over the summer. He added that former Councilmember Jim Curatalo, Sr. had this idea for a farmers market and stated everyone is glad he did, but wished he was here to enjoy it. Mayor Alexander presented the Curatalo family with a commemorative watering can for the idea that Mr. Curatalo, Sr. had. B3. Presentation of a Geographic Information System (GIS) Day 2001 video. Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, and the GIS staff came forward with Mr. Temple talking about GIS Day. A video was also shown that was taken during this event. B4. Presentation of Geographic Information System (GIS) Day 2001 certificates. Certificates were presented to Kathy Thompson, Jean Weis and Steve Thomas for their participation in GIS Day. City Council Minutes November 21, 2001 Page 2 B5. ADDED ITEM - Recognition of John Rovick, better known as "Sheriff John" on the longest-running, locally produced five-day a week program, "The Lunch Brigade". Mayor Alexander talked about the celebration of Mr. Rovick's birthday and commented on his accomplishments. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Debra Berger, representative of the John Rains House museum, talked about the nostalgic Christmas they would be having there on December 7 and 8 from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m. She stated tours would be given with a minimal fee of $2.00. She continued to talk about the uniqueness of the house. Councilmember Dutton brought up there would be crafts there as well. C2. Gwynn Frost stated last weekend was the annual Chaffey Garcia's open house and commented on its success. She also wanted te say thank you to the City for the holiday baskets that were put together for the needy families for the Thanksgiving holiday. C3. John Lyons of Etiwanda stated he appreciated seeing Senator Solo at the Council meeting. He also thanked the City Clerk for following up on his problems he had at his polling place for the November 6 election. He added he is concerned with the management of the Registrar of voters. C4. Betty Linker of the senior center wanted to thank the City for the flags in front of the senior center. C5. Brenda Fryan, 7055 Isle Court, representing the majority of the Bellrnont Estate Equestrian owners, wanted to talk to the Council about erecting fences across their private equestrian accesses. She stated she had been given permission by Doug Norton, the housing superintendent of her tract, to put gates up. She said she was cited by the municipal code stating she could not do this. She stated it is not a feeder trail, and that her CC&R's state the easement is for private equestrian purposes. She added she does not want this to be a public access. She stated she would only be willing to let the City take over this easement if they are willing to take off the liability, maintenance and taxes that she abides by. She stated she realizes the City is not willing to do this, and therefore, it is within her rights to erect the fence on her property. She stated she is asking that this be placed on the agenda so that she and all other parties of this matter can be in attendance to address the Council. C6. Carol Douglas, Alta Loma Riding Club, stated she is concerned with the issue that was brought up by Mrs. Fryan. She stated there are standards and plans for the trails. She asked that the City keep the access open. C7. Vicky Vaughn, Alta Loma Riding Club, stated they have worked many years on keeping the trails open and asked that the Council help them keep it this way. C8. Jim Jebbia, 12753 George, Bellmont Estates, stated when they bought their home they felt the trails would be private access to the homes. He stated there are other issues other than allowing everyone to access the trails with their horses. He stated there are graffiti problems, kids drinking and other liability issues. He stated they do not want to deny the horse clubs access to these areas. He said they only want to deny people access to their backyards. He added he was concerned about the upkeep of the trails because he is responsible for taking care of it. City Council Minutes November 21,2001 Page 3 C9. Ken Douglas stated if we admit that we need to fence these horse trails for security reasons, then the City is going to have to fence horse trails in the entire City. He stated you can't make a security fence just for one tract and you would have to do it for all of the feeder tracts as well. He stated there is liability on any horse trail throughout the City as well as all feeder trails. He stated any debris on a trail is up to each homeowner. C10. John Hullahan stated if there had been fences he would not have lost a go-cart in his backyard. He felt the Council should look at the private and public parts of these trails. Mayor Alexander stated probably everyone on the Council will be up to look at it. Cll. Raul Delgado commented on what had occurred during the announcement and presentation portion of the meeting and stated he agreed with the comments made about Councilmember Curatalo, Sr. He stated he appreciated Senator Soto being present and felt she has done a lot for us. He also wanted to say hello to the kids at Mariposa School. He asked if the City is involved in the Chaffey College agenda. Mayor Alexander stated the City does not have any control over their agenda. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31,2001. D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/31/01, 11/07/01 and 11/14/01 and Payroll ending 11/04/01 for the total amount of $690,441.14. D3. Approval of request to make a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) DRC2001- 00628 - Arturo Flores - for the issuance of an Alcohol Beverage License (Off-Sale General, Type 21) within a previously approved 4,320 square foot retail liquor store, located at 8939 Foothill Blvd. - APN: 0208-192-07. Relates files: Conditional UsePermit DRC2001-00335 and Variance DRC 2001-00612. RESOLUTION NO. 01-251 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE FOR A RETAIL LIQUOR STORE WITHIN AN EXISTING 4,320 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING, LOCATED AT 8939 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN: 208- 192-07 D4. Approval of a request to make a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) DRC2001-0067 - Albertson's Express - for the issuance of an Alcoholic Beverage License (Type 20, Off-Sale Beer and Wine) for a proposed convenience store, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -APN: 207-102-49. City Council Minutes November 21,2001 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 01-252 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY AND A REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE WITHIN A CONVENIENCE STORE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 207-102-49 D5. Approval to adopt Annual Statement of Investment Policy. D6. Approval to appropriate $65,010 in Account No. 10013046035 (Construction Management) for contract inspection services. D7. Approval for the purchase of one (1) International 4300 4X2 Chipper Truck from Dieterich International Truck Sales, of San Bernardino, in the amount of $66,021.12, funded from Fund 1712-001- 5604. D8. Approval for the purchase of one (1) Vermeer BC1000 Brush Chipper from Vermeer-California, of Fontana, in the amount of $25,771.51, funded from Fund 1712-001-5603. D9. Approval to purchase two (2) Message Boards from the manufacturer, Advanced Safety Products of Fal[brook, California, as a single source purchase in the amount of $47,975.10, to be funded from CLEEP Grant Fund Account # 1366702-5603. D10. Approval of Improvement Agreement & Improvement Securities for DR 00-67 on the north side of 4th Street, west of Milliken Ave., submitted by Ironwood Apartments LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company. ~ RESOLUTION NO. 01-253 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DR 00-67 D11. Approval of a Reimbursement Agreement for Traffic Signal Installation on 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue in conjunction with the development of DR 99-46, located at the southwest corner of 6t~ Street and Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Cabot Industrial Trust. RESOLUTION NO. 01-254 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF 6TM STREET AND HERMOSA AVENUE D12. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Monumentation Cash Deposit & Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 & Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract Map No. 15174, at the southwest corner of Church St. and Rochester Ave., submitted by KB Homes of Greater Los Angeles. City Council Minutes November 21, 2001 Page $ RESOLUTION NO. 01-255 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15174 AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 01-256 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT 15174 D13. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. (CO 01-095) to provide traffic signal and street improvement plans for Base Line Road and the southbound 1-15 freeway on/off ramps in the amount of $149,986 and authorization of 10% contingency to be funded from Account No. 112430356501248124. D14. Approval of Agreement (CO 01-096), Covenant and Conservation Easement regarding City of Rancho Cucamonga Historic Landmark #96-01 - Sam and AIfreda Maloof Foundation for the Fine Arts and Crafts (California Civil Code 815, et seq.) D15. Approval of a Lease Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Etiwanda Historical Society (CO 01~097) to establish a community building use in the Chaffey-lsle House. RESOLUTION NO. 01-257 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY RELATING TO THE USE OF THE CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE AS A COMMUNITY BUILDING, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 1089-071-26 D16. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 99-46, submitted by Cabot Industrial Properties, LP., located on the southwest corner of Sixth Street and Hermosa Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 01-258 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 99-46 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D17. Approval to accept Improvements, release Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 13759, submitted by Forecast Group, L.P., located on the west side of Haven, north of the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way. RESOLUTION NO. 01-259 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13759 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes November 21,2001 Page 6 D18. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, Letter of Credit No. RP200067, and Labor and Material Bond, Letter of Credit No. RP221005, for Improvements for Tract 13812, submitted by Wealth V. LLC, located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland. D19. Approval 1o accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 14459, submitted by Alta Loma One and Two, a Joint Venture, located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Lemon Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 01-260 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14459 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff repods contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.24.060 PERTAINING TO FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTS Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 555A. ORDINANCE NO. 555A (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE ISSUANCE OF MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT PERMITS, AND REVISING CHAPTER 9.24 OF TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 555A. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. No Items Submitted. No Items Submitted. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS City Council Minutes November 21,2001 Page '7 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATF ACTION: Report received and filed. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J 1. Councilmember Williams asked if the horse trail issue would be back. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated he has talked to most of the people that spoke tonight. He felt possibly the Trails Committee should meet to discuss this and then make a recommendation back to the Council. Mayor Alexander agreed this should go to the Trails Committee. Councilmember Biane stated he would like information about what is in their CC&R's. Councilmember Dutton stated he concurred with Mr. Buller that this should go to the Trails Committee and that this should go to the Planning Commission prior to coming to the City Council. He would like staff to keep the Council appraised on what is going on with this matter. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated they would notify the homeowners and the Alta Loma Riding Club when the next Trails Committee meeting will be. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk December 5, 2001 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CiTY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 5, 2001 in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Bill Curley, Assistant City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Flavio Nunez, Assistant RDA Analyst; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ilk Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Jori Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Laura Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner; Brad Bullet, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Police Department; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Britt Wilson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Councilmember: Grace Curatalo B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS MAYOR ALEXANDER ANNOUNCED THAT THE DECEMBER 19, 2001 COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE CANCELED DUE TO THE HOLIDAY AND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES MEETING TO RE HELD IN SACRAMENTO ON DECEMBER 18- 20, 200'1. B1. Presentation to Assemblywoman Gloria Negrete McLeod for her commitment to Rancho Cucamonga as exemplified by her assistance in obtaining funds towards a new mobile stage for the City. Mayor Alexander informed everyone about the $25,000 that Assemblywoman McLeod was able to get for the City to be used towards the purchase of a portable stage. He presented a plaque to her thanking her for her efforts and assistance. B2. Presentation of Proclamations to the 2001 General Plan Update Technical Advisory Staff Committee Members for their contributions to successful completion of the 2001 General Plan Update. Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the process that took place to update the General Plan. Mayor Alexander read the proclamation and presented them to the staff involved. Brad Buller, City Planner, also recognized the consultant and thanked them for their work on this project. B3. Presentation of Plaques to the General Plan Task Force Members on successful completion of the 2001 General Plan Update. Mayor Alexander presented plaques to all of the General Plan Task Force Members. City Council Minutes December 5, 2001 Page 2 B4. Presentation of a Proclamation to '~Ne Tip" Founder, Bill Brownell, for his Years of Service to our community. Mr. Brownell was not able to attend. B5. Presentation of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department's Kick-Off of the 9th Annual Spark of Love Toy Drive. Jim Townsend of the Fire District talked about the Spark of Love Program. He encouraged everyone to participate. B6. Proclamations recognizing the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, Casa Colina, JC Penney Outlet Store and the San Antonio Community Hospital for their outstanding support of public libraries through their participation in "Celebrate 2000." Deborah Clark, Library Director, explained this program. She and Mayor Alexander presented Proclamations to the participants. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Cl. John Lyons spoke about the new fire maintenance facility and the bankruptcy of Enron. C2. John Campbell, Santolina Place (also with Pack 650 of Hillside Church), thanked City staff for arranging for them to be here tonight to meet the Council and see how local government works. He thanked Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, for his help with the cell tower issue. He also thanked other city staff for what they do to help keep the City the way it is. He thanked the City Manager and City Council for all they do for the City. C3. Steve Chord, Manzanita, stated he would like his Grandma's house plans to be approved and felt everyone in the City was very nice. C4. Matt Campbell, Santolina Place, stated he likes the parks, his school principal and the people in Rancho Cucamonga. He thanked the Mayor for coming to his house. He added a left turn signal would be good at Etiwanda and Highland. C5. Tyler Brigham, Berkshire, stated he likes Red Hill Park and would like to see Central Park built. C6. A student inquired when would the freeway be built. Mayor Alexander stated November 2002. The student asked what was being done to get rid of smog. Mayor Alexander stated through AQMD it is being reduced. C7. Nacho Gracia, Northtown Housing, wished the City Council Happy Holidays. He also thanked the Council, RDA staff and City staff for all of their assistance with their projects. C8. Daniel Uribe of Rancho Cucamonga High School, asked about houses being built on small lots with small yards. Mayor Alexander stated everyone likes something different, but the Planning Commission is trying to set the best standards they can for various areas. City Council Minutes December 5, 2001 Page 3 D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item Dll has an error in the title of the staff report, with a memo on file in the City Clerk's office explaining this. D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/20/01 and 11/28/01 Payroll ending 11/18/01 for the total amount of $3,352,746.47. D2. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 8t~ Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue, to be funded from Account No. 11763035650/1297176-0. RESOLUTION NO. 01-263 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "8TM STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM GROVE AVENUE TO BAKER AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING & DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D3. Approval of Resolution supporting the passage of Proposition 40 - Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2002. RESOLUTION NO. 01-264 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 40, THE CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2002 D4. Approval of Professional Services Agreement for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services with David Turch and Associates (CO 01-098). D5. Approval to execute an Agreement with Geographics (CO 01-099) and approve a FY 2001-2002- budget appropriation of $15,000 to the Non-departmental General Overhead City Account #1001001- 5300 for professional services for the pilot edition of the quarterly newsletter insert in The Grapevine. D6. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 00-66, located on the southeast corner of 6th Street and Rochester Court, submitted by Surachai Wattanaporn and Pansiri Wattanaporn, Husband and Wife. RESOLUTION NO. 01-265 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 00-66 City Council Minutes December 5, 2001 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 01-266 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 00-66 DT. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of $69,981.45 ($63,619.50 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, E.G.N. Construction, Inc., (CO 01-100) for the construction of the Banyan Street right turn lane west of Milliken Avenue, and appropriate $72,000.00 from Fund balance 124 (transportation fees). D8. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of $202,866.51 ($184,424.10 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent Iow bidder, R.J. Noble Company (CO 01-101), for the construction of the 6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue, to be funded from AB 2928 Funds, Account No. 11823035650/1324182-0. D9. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Traffic Signal Improvements, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation, located on Fourth Street at Santa Anita and Barrington Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 01-267 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS ON FOURTH STREET AT SANTA ANITA AND BARRINGTON AVENUES AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D10. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for CUP 99-04, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation, located on the southeast corner of Milliken and Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 01-268 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 99-04 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Dll, Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, Letter of Credit No. LG210041, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 13812, submitted by Wealth V, LLC, located west of Etiwanda Avenue, between Summit and Highland. (Correction memo attached) RESOLUTION NO. 01-269 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13812 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes December 5, 2001 Page $ D12. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tracts 15072 and 15072-1, submitted by Lewis Development Company, located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 01-270 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15072 AND 15072-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar as corrected on item D11. Motion carried unanimously 4- 0-1 (Curatalo absent). No Items Submitted. No Items Submitted. No Items Submitted. H1. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS G. PUBLIC HEARINGS H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS REPORT ON TRAFFIC PATTERN PLANNING FOR THOROUGHBRED/JENNET CHRISTMAS LIGHT SHOW Staff report presented by Captain Pete Ortiz and Corporal Michael O'Brian, Police Department. ACTION: Report received and filed. H2. APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR THE METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT Staff report presented by Laura Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner. Councilmember Dutton inquired where the balance of the funds would come from for this project. City Council Minutes December 5, 2001 Page (; Laura Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner, stated the other $65,000 would hopefully come from in-kind services. Councilmember Biane asked about the likelihood of receiving the grant funds. Laura Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner, stated she did not know, but felt his was a very good project and worth the effort. Councilmember Williams wanted everyone to know the City is trying to get bus service to the Metrolink Station through Omnitrans. RESOLUTION NO. 01-271 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 01-271. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Curatalo absent). I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. PRESENTATION BY AARON KNOX, REPRESENTING INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST Staff report presented by Aaron Knox who also gave a power point presentation. (A report is on file in the City Clerk's office). He asked the Council to adopt a Resolution to support this effort. Councilmember Biane stated he would like staff to look at it further and bring it back to the Council for further consideration. Mayor Alexander felt this should also be checked into by staff and brought back to the Council in the future. Councilmember Dutton stated he is suppodive of the Resolution, but will go along with the others for more information to come back. He asked that this come back at the January 2, 2002 meeting. Mayor Alexander asked him to send everything he has to staff. He suggested a copy of his power point presentation be made available to the Council. Councilmember Williams concurred. ACTION: To come back January 2, 2002. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. City Council Minutes December 5, 2001 Page ? K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously4-0-1 (Curatalo absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C N E C K WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name AP00176927 005448 1ST STOP ~ARKET AP00176928 001112 4 KIDS CLOTHES UNDER TEN DOLL AP00176929 000001 AP00176930 006271 AP00176931 005463 AP00176932 001334 AP00176933 001220 AP00176934 005459 AP00176935 005231 AP00176936 021700 AP00176937 006199 AP00176938 005458 AP00176939 005446 AP00176940 002254 AP00176941 002693 AP00176942 001083 AP00176943 005807 AP00176944 005478 AP00176945 006115 AP00176946 000402 AP00176947 021893 AP00176948 004407 AP00176949 005249 AP00176950 001746 AP00176951 004699 Date 12/08/01 ~2/05/01 ~ EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 12/05/01 ABBEY EVENTS SERVICES 12/05/01 ABI VIP ATTORNEY SERVICE 12/05/01 ABLAC 12/05/01 ACCb-RATE L~J4INATED PRODUCTS I 12/05/01 ADECCO NORTH D24ERICA LLC 12/05/01 ~F SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 12/05/01 AIR LIQUIDE ~4ERICA CORPORATI 12/05/01 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 12/05/01 ALTA EM INC 12/05/01 A~TA LOMA FEED ~ TACK 12/05/01 D~4ERICAN PACIFIC HOMES INC 12/05/01 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 12/05/01 AMYS BRIDAL 12/05/01 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 12/05/01 ASSE 12/05/01 AUFBAU CORPORATION 12/05/01 AUTO RESTORATORS 12/05/01 BAP~RETT BUSINESS SERVICES INC 12/05/01 BE~ER ENERGY IDEAS 12/05/01 BIRTHWAYS 12/05/01 BOISE CASCA/DE OFFICE PRODUCTS 12/05/01 BORDNER, NL~RGIE 12/05/01 R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 1 FINANCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note 23.00 MW OH 18.87 NW OH 393.96 MW OH 2,148.14 MW OH 62.42 MW OH 294.06 MW OH 63.00 ~4W OH 10.31 MW OH 1,155.00 MW OH 16.53 MW OH 7,608.42 MW OH 165.00 MW OH 9.15 MW ON 252.68 MW OH 1,757.00 MW OH 24.21 MW OH 450.00 MW OH 1,510.00 MW OH 16,890.00 MW OH 180.00 MW OH 59.99 MW OH 445.00 MW OH 2,369.80 MW OH 3O.00 MW OH 480.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--lo¢: FIBL~NCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00176952 005457 AP00176953 005456 AP00176954 004467 AP00176955 004585 AP00176956 000576 AP00176957 005481 AP00176958 005746 AP00176959 005447 AP00176960 005480 AP00176961 004356 AP00176962 004735 AP00176963 006459 AP00176964 005453 AP00176965 005450 AP00176966 005451 AP00176967 000069 AP00176968 001061 AP00176969 000914 AP00176970 004537 AP00176971 004654 AP00176972 006215 AP00176973 001081 AP00176974 002362 AP00176975 001328 AP00176976 005449 BORG ~b%~NI/FACTURING INC 12/05/01 BPJ~KE DEPOT 12/05/01 BRKICH CONSTRUCTION, ROBERT 12/05/01 BROOKES PUBLISHING CO, PAUL H 12/05/01 BULLER, BRAD 12/05/01 BURNETT, C~-MDYCE 12/05/01 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 12/05/01 C D R N / CAL NET INC 12/05/01 CAL OSF3% P~PORTER 12/05/01 CALIFORNIA SOLS~D CSS 12/05/01 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 12/05/01 CASTRO, PAY 12/05/01 CELL CRETE CORPORATION 12/05/01 CENTURY 21 PRESTIGE PROPERTIE 12/05/01 CGD CONSTRUCTION CO INC 12/05/01 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRI 12/05/01 CFJkMPION AWARDS ANqD SPECIALIE 12/05/01 CLAREMON~C C~4ERA D-ND VIDEO IN 12/05/01 CLASS SOFTWARE SOLLFCIONS 12/05/01 CLAi~CON, J~-NICE 12/05/01 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY 12/05/01 COCOS BAKERY RESTAUPJ~NTS 12/05/01 COMSERCO INC. 12/05/01 CONCA2qNON, SHARI 12/05/01 CONQUEST bffG GROUP 12/05/01 Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note 20.00 MW OH 169.78 MW OH 6,000.00 MW OH 445.61 ~5~ OH 41.92 ~P~ OH 40.00 MW OH 5,202.00 MW OH 25.32 MW OH 337.00 MW OH 361.17 MW OH 540.42 MW OH 150.88 MW OH 13.02 MW OH 23.14 MW OH 24.00 MW OH 5,791.50 MW OH 1,161.00 MW OH 208.72 MW OH 760.00 MW OH 125.00 MW OH 137.22 MW OH 46.00 Nf~ OH 334.08 ~5~ OH 199.50 bTW OH 9.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 3 WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCEER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINA/~CE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00176977 006709 AP00176978 000930 AP00176979 006711 AP00176980 001085 AP00176981 001321 AP00178982 001321 AP00176983 005779 AP00176984 000085 AP00176985 005487 AP00176986 005063 AP00176987 004544 AP00176988 000839 AP00176989 005495 AP00176990 003307 AP00176991 004205 AP00176992 006536 AP00176993 003384 AP00176994 090520 AP00176995 005149 AP00176996 004468 AP00176997 002349 AP00176998 005498 AP00176998 006262 AP00177000 000229 AP00177001 005521 COPP CRUSHING, DIkN 12/05/01 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 12/05/01 CORPORATE PRINTERS 12/05/01 COSTCO WHOLES~E #449 12/05/01 COURT TRUSTEE 12/05/01 COURT TRUSTEE 12/05/01 CSMFO 12/05/01 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 12/05/01 D AND N CONSTRUCTION 12/05/01 DELAMORA, MARIO 12/05/01 DICK, ERIC 12/05/01 DIETERICH INTEP/4ATIONAL TRUCK 12/09/01 DINAN, ~TTHEW 12/05/01 DMS I~NDSCAPE SERVICES 12/05/01 DYN~4IC GRAPHICS INC 12/05/01 EASTER, PAMELA 12/05/01 EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 12/05/01 EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS INC. 12/05/01 ESCOBAR, JONATHAN 12/05/01 ESCOBAR, S~gTIAGO 12/05/01 ESGIL CORPORATION 12/05/01 ESPINOZA, RUBY 12/05/01 EVD-NS SPORTING GOODS 12/05/01 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 12/05/01 EXPERI~ 12/05/01 Check /Mnount Type Subs Rel To Note 140.00 MW OH 2,983.13 MW OH 241.24 MW OH 23.02 MW OH 118.50 MW OH 200.00 MW OH 25.00 MW OH 3,838.12 MW OH 10.00 MW OH 105.00 MW OH 320.00 MW OH 534.04 MW OH 70.00 MW OH 40,074.10 MW OH 58.95 MW OH 87.18 MW OH 3,035.76 MW OH 2,754.89 MW OH 35.00 MW OH 35.00 MW OH 40,382.74 MW OH 32.00 MW OH 8,080.03 MW OH 818.42 MW OH 50.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name AP00177002 005499 EXPERT AUTO SERVICE AP00177003 000123 AP00177004 000155 AP00177005 006556 AP00177006 005150 AP00177007 005892 AP00177008 001082 AP00177009 006232 AP00177010 005500 AP00177011 005184 AP00177012 003356 AP00177013 005501 AP00177014 005503 AP00177015 005502 AP00177016 005504 AP00177017 000650 AP00177018 005505 AP00177019 006383 AP00177020 000735 AP00177021 003200 AP00177022 005434 AP00177023 005572 AP00177024 004724 AP00177025 000158 AP00177026 001234 Date 1~/o5/01 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 12/05/01 FILARSKY ~ WATT 12/05/01 FINESSE PERSOAIN-EL ASSOCIATES 12/05/01 FINLEY, CHRIS 12/05/01 FIRST PLACE TROPHIES 12/05/01 FRA~IN COVEY CO 12/05/01 G/~DABOUT TOURS INC 12/05/01 G/~4EWORKS 12/05/01 G/LRCIA, DED/~NA 12/05/01 GARCIA, VIVID~N 12/05/01 GAREY HIGH SCHOOL 12/05/01 GENERAL NUTRITION CENTER 3825 12/05/01 GIORD/L~O, MARIAN-NA 12/05/01 GONZALES TRI COLrNTY CONSTRUCT 12/05/01 GRAINGER, WW 12/05/01 GREAT CLIPS 12/05/01 H.V. CARTER CO. 12/05/01 HAVEN CAd{ WASH 12/05/01 HECKETT MUL~ISERV 12/05/01 HERAtS/gDEZ, J~%NINE 12/05/01 HERNANDEZ, JOSE DE JESUS 12/05/01 HI WAY SAFETY INC 12/05/01 EOLLIDAY ROCK co INC 12/05/01 HOSE MAN INC 12/05/01 R E ~ I S T E R CHECK RE~ISTER Pa~e 4 FINANCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check ~ount Type Subs Rel To Note ============= ==~= ==== ~===== ====================================== 273.88 MW OH 67.33 MW OH 510.00 MW OH 3,630.39 MW OH 60.00 MW OR 25.19 MW OH 105.70 MW OH 483.40 MW OH 400.00 MW OH 5.00 MW OH 118.77 MW OH 200.00 MW OH 39.72 MW OH 135.00 MW OH 101.39 MW OH 295.83 MW OH 5.74 MW OH 391.18 MW OH 1,357.40 5{W OH 5,036.50 MW OH 63.50 MW OH 180.00 ~4W OH 693.50 MW OH 1,403.56 MW OH 32.05 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCNER--leg: GL JL--loc: Cheek Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00177027 001325 NURST, CNERYL 12/05/01 AP00177028 000495 AP00177029 000167 AP00177030 000167 AP00177031 002733 AP00177032 001218 AP00177033 000122 AP00177034 002315 AP00177035 001593 AP00177036 000932 AP00177037 090933 AP00177038 003452 AP00177039 005571 AP00177040 008782 AP00177041 005172 AP00177042 004072 AP00177043 009108 AP00177044 004221 AP00177045 000149 AP00177046 005445 AP00177047 001024 AP00177048 004982 AP00177049 000195 AP00177050 000849 AP00177051 000197 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 12/05/01 ICBO-CITRUS BELT CHAPTER 12/05/01 ICBO-CITRUS BELT CHAPTER 12/05/01 icm~ 12/o8/ol INDUSTRIA~ DISTRIBUTION GROUP 12/05/01 INI~/~D VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 12/05/01 INI~ND WHOLESALE A~3RSERY 12/05/01 INTERNATIOND~L COUNCIL OF SHOP 12/05/01 INTERNATIONAL RIGHT OF WAY AS 12/05/01 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 12/05/01 IN~FRAVAIA ROCK AND S/~D 12/0S/01 IRENETA, JLrLIO C 12/05/01 JBND~AM INC 12/o5/ol JIST PUBLISHING 12/05/01 KCB COMPANy 12/05/01 KEITH, BARBARA 12/05/01 KEYZONE ENTERPRISES 12/05/01 KING, LD 12/05/01 KLEIN PRODUCTS 12/05/01 KOCH MATERIALS COMPA~NY 12/05/01 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 12/05/01 I~%NCE SOLL AND LUNGN~kRD 12/05/01 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 12/05/01 LEAGUE OF CALIFOP~NIA CITIES 12/08/01 R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5 FINANCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note 313.50 MW OH 232.20 MW OH 45.00 MW OH 195.00 MW OH 84.93 MW OH 79.72 MW OH 100.00 MW OH 118.16 MW OH 150.00 MW OH 165.00 MW OH 227.91 MW OH 1,203.75 MW OH 60.00 MW OH 591.25 MW OH 26.89 MW OH 38,718.48 MW OH 90.00 MW OH 500.00 MW OH 163.11 MW OH 986.23 MW OH 132.02 MW OR 8,049.60 MW OH 1,910.50 MW OH 735.48 MW OH 40.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6 WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL~-loc: FINANCE---job: 66337 #S080 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKP~G--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00177052 032283 AP00177053 003275 AP00177054 001005 AP00177055 005884 AP00177056 005274 AP00177057 000200 AP00177058 001047 AP00177059 001336 AP00177060 002587 AP00177061 031458 AP00177062 006143 AP00177063 000549 AP00177064 000072 AP00177065 004727 AP00177066 005464 AP00177067 001025 AP00177068 005507 AP00177069 007173 AP00177070 002198 AP00177071 006170 AP00177072 005852 AP00177073 005469 AP00177074 005470 AP00177075 005471 AP00177076 005885 LETNER ROOFING CO INC 12/05/01 LIGHT BULBS ETC 12/05/01 LIL STITCH 12/05/01 LILBURN CORPORATION 12/05/01 LITTLE BF2%R PRODUCTIONS 12/05/01 LOS A/~GELES TIMES 12/05/01 LOS MONITOS TACOS 12/05/01 LOWER, DAP~LENE 12/05/01 LUTTEpdV~N, GEORGE 12/05/01 ~CRO PRO 12/05/01 9ULNNERINO, JOHN 12/05/01 ~4ARIPOSA HORTICULTbq~L ENT IN 12/05/01 MARK CHRIS INC 12/05/01 5~%RSHALL PLbq~BING 12/05/01 MBEKO-EK~-NEM, TOM 12/05/01 MCN~%STER CARR SUPPLY COMP~NY 12/05/01 MCNIEL, LARRY 12/05/01 MEYER, PATRICIA 12/05/01 MICHAELS STORES INC 3019 12/05/01 MICROAGE COMPUTEPd~ART 12/08/01 MIDWEST TAPE 12/05/01 MILBES, D~DIB 12/05/01 MISCHKE, ESMER/LLDA 12/05/01 MONTEZ, STEVE 12/05/01 MORITA, DU~/qE 12/05/01 Check A/~ount Type Subs Rel To Note 9,554.00 ~K~ OH 119.55 MW OH 2,222.03 MW OH 4,928.00 MW OH 1,745.00 MW OH 36.00 MW OH 23.00 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK ~GISTER Page 7 WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIN/~NCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00177077 000842 MOUNTAIN VIEW S~L~LL ENG REPAI 12/05/01 AP00177078 001332 AP00177079 002248 AP00177080 002837 AP00177081 000744 AP00177082 001816 AP00177083 006687 AP00177084 004758 AP00177085 004527 AP00177086 000433 AP00177087 005511 N M A DUES C/O BARBARA WHITE NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS NATIONAL DEFERRED NATIONAL NEIGNBORROOD WATCH NATIONS RENT NETIQ CORPORATION NIKPOUR, MOHi~WED NIXON EGLI EQUIPMENT CO NUNALLY RONA~D DRYWDJ~L INC AP00177088 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub AP00177089 000523 AP00177090 000365 AP00177091 000224 AP00177092 005136 AP00177093 001441 AP00177094 000338 AP00177095 005343 AP00177096 004223 AP00177097 001506 AP00177098 005409 AP00177099 000757 AP00177100 006205 AP00177101 004267 OFFICE DEPOT OLD QUAKER PAINT COMPANY ORANGE COL~qTY STRIPING SERVIC OUTER BA/~KS PACIFIC BELL PACIFIC EQUIP AND IRRIGATION PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES PAPER DIRECT INC PARK WEST GROUP PARTSMASTER INC PEP BOYS PETER/4AN LL~4BER PETES ROAD SERVICE ~2/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/Ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/os/ol 12/os/ol 12/os/ol 12/oS/Ol 12/o5/ol 12/os/ol 12/os/ol 12/os/ol 12/os/ol 12/os/ol 12/o5/ol 12/os/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/os/ol Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note ===========~= ==== ==== ====== ====================================== 276.46 MW OH 13.85 MW OH 121.95 MW OH 937.01 MW OH 22,458.86 MW OH 160.73 MW OH 64.50 ~Sg OH 4,082.54 MW OH 35.00 MW OH 350.80 MW OH 101.00 MW OH 0.00 VM OH 5,I67.39 MW OH 415.92 MW OH 11,087.32 MW OH 6,872.61 MW OH 4,218.24 MW OH 17,726.75 MW OH 61.81 MW OH 333.78 MW OH 53.87 MW OH 638.44 MW OH 52.02 MW OH 193.23 MW OH 1,289.95 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB Void CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8 WED, DEC 08, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCEER--le~: GL JL--lo¢: FI~U%NCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... proD: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177102 006211 PIONEER ST~NDARD ELECTRONICS 12/05/01 459.03 MW OH AP00177103 000272 PITNEY BOWES 12/08/01 316.37 MW AP00177104 005483 pLAXICON COMPANY 12/05/01 90.76 MW AP00177105 000791 PMI 12/05/01 1,202.30 MW OH AP00177106 000255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 12/05/01 7,107.50 MW OH AP00177107 005331 pOURHASSANIA,N, ABBY 12/05/01 35.00 MW OH AP00177108 005485 POWER, MONICA 12/05/01 50.00 MW OH AP00177109 004401 PRA~XAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 12/05/01 9.50 MW OH AP00177110 091636 PRINCIPAL LIFE 12/05/01 76,728.84 MW OH AP00177111 005264 PROACTIVE EMPLOYMENT SOLUTION 12/05/01 490.00 MW OH AP00177112 003444 PROJECT SISTER 12/05/01 1,212.50 MW OH AP00177113 000065 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 12/05/01 21.00 MW OH AP00177114 005486 QIDWAI, MUSHIR 12/05/01 200.00 MW OH AP00177115 005899 QUALITY ONE ENGRAVING 12/05/01 167.71 MW AP00177116 005493 QUALITY TECH BUSINESS MACHINE 12/05/01 30.78 MW OH AP00177117 001323 QUINTANA, ZITA 12/05/01 193.00 MW OH AP00177118 000264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPS-NY 12/05/01 193.99 MW OH AP00177119 000070 R3%NCHO CUCAMONGA C~AMBER OF C 12/05/01 30.00 MW OH AP00177120 000207 RANCHO MINI STORAGE 12/05/01 285.00 MW OH AP00177121 006058 RANCHO SCREEN PRINT A/qD ENERO 12/05/01 158.41 MW OH AP00177122 001056 RANCHO VALLEY VOLLEYBALL CLUB 12/05/01 105.73 MW OH AP00177123 011912 RAPID TRANSCRIPT MEDIC3%L TRAN 12/05/01 35.20 MW OH AP00177124 000545 RED WING SHOE STORE 12/05/01 893.14 MW AP00177125 004472 REDINGER, TOM 12/05/01 35.00 MW OH AP00177126 005435 REGUENA, ALMA 12/05/01 65.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C B E C K WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name AP00177127 001324 AP00177128 005467 AP00177129 005618 AP00177130 605472 AP00177131 000276 AP00177132 001322 AP00177133 003314 AP00177134 005570 AP00177135 006673 AP00177136 005436 AP00177137 006117 AP00177138 005474 AP00177139 005538 AP00177140 005538 AP00177141 001590 AP00177142 001590 AP00177143 000150 AP00177144 006604 AP00177145 031120 AP00177146 031120 AP00177147 031120 AP00177148 031120 AP00177149 031120 AP00177150 031120 AP00177151 005438 Date REIAVrLS~RDTSEN, DBBRA 12/05/01 RHODES COLLEGE 12/05/01 RICHARDS WATSON ~ GERSHON 12/05/01 RICHFIELD TILE /LND CONSTRNCTI 12/05/01 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 12/05/01 RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPO 12/05/01 ROBINSON FERTILIZER 12/05/01 RODRIGUEZ, OSC3%R 12/05/01 ROTH STAFFING COMP~-NIES INC 12/05/01 RUH, DEB~NIS 12/05/01 s B AND 0 INC 12/05/01 SADDLEBACK STEEL FABRICATORS 12/05/01 SAN D-NTONIO MATERIALS 12/05/01 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS 12/05/01 SA/~ BER/g COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 12/05/01 SAN BERN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 12/05/01 S~ BEP~N COUNTy 12/05/01 SCHNEIDER, D~IEL 12/05/01 SCMAF 12/05/01 SC~F 12/05/01 SCMAF ~2/05/01 SCMAF 12/05/01 SCMAF 12/05/01 SCMAF 12/05/01 SEQUOIA MIDDLE SCHOOL 12/05/01 R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 9 FINANCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check A/nount Type Subs Rel To Note 180.00 MW OH 3,396.70 MW OH 36.00 MW OH 74.18 MW OH 376.00 MW OE 2,399.56 MW OH 240.00 MW OH 1,120.64 F5~ OH 34.25 NW OH 1,430.28 MW OH 184.14 MW OH 80.09 MW OH 289.68 MW OH 200.00 MW ON 325.00 MW OH 42.09 MW OH 350.00 MW OH 15.00 MW OH 15.00 MW OH 15.00 MW OH 15.00 MW OH 15.00 MW OH 100.00 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 10 WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--lo~: FINANCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... pro~: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check A~nount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177152 001829 S~L~RED TECHNOLOGY FAIRCHILD T 12/05/01 3,557.40 MW OH AP00177153 005576 AP00177154 004393 AP00177155 000351 AP00177156 000692 AP00177157 001327 AP00177158 005298 SHERATON GRAND SHOETERIA IND SION SHOP, THE SIR SPEEDY SMART ~ FINAL SOROKOWSKI JOHNATHAN a AP00177159 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub AP00177160 001432 AP00177161 005549 AP00177162 005516 AP00177163 001074 AP00177164 001335 AP00177165 005281 AP00177166 001373 AP00177167 005482 AP00177168 007256 AP00177169 006355 AP00177170 006411 AP00177171 005476 AP00177172 003735 AP00177173 000836 AP00177174 002344 AP00177175 003204 AP00177176 001309 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SPENGLER,CYNTHIA J SPLASH POOLS & CONSTRUCTION I STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE STERICYCLE INC STERLING TRUCK EQUIPMENT STOCKLING, RICKY STOFA, JOSEPH SUNGARD BI TECH INC SWEETS CLEAN SWEEP T & D BUILDERS TANNER, O C TARGET SPECI~J~TY PRODUCTS TARGET TOGO'S TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES 12/05/01 842.25 MW OH 12/05/01 62.88 Mw OH 12/05/01 32.25 MW OH 12/05/01 161.25 MW OH 12/05/01 515.37 MW OH 12/05/01 500.00 MW OH 12/05/01 0.00 VM OH 12/05/01 65,875.06 MW OH 12/05/01 500.00 MW OH 12/05/01 245.60 MW OH 12/05/01 40.86 MW OH 12/05/01 49.65 MW OH 12/05/01 163.74 MW OH 12/08/01 444.93 MW OH 12/o5/ol 5,oo MW OH 12/05/01 25.00 MW OH 12/05/01 8,724.38 MW OH 12/05/01 9,300.00 MW OH 12/05/01 98.40 MW OH 12/05/01 2,806.31 MW OH 12/05/01 511.40 MW OH 12/05/01 325.70 MW OH 12/05/01 276.00 MW OH 12/05/01 2.00 MW OH Void Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00177177 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 12/05/01 AP00177178 003437 AP00177179 003912 AP00177180 001226 AP00177181 003473 AP00177182 000919 UNIFIRST Lg~IFORM SERVICE UNIQUE CREATIONS UNITED PA~RCEL SERVICE UNITED TRAFFIC UNITED WAY AP00177183 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub AP00177184 000137 VERIZON CD-LIFORNIA AP00177185 000137 VERIZON C~J~IFORNIA AP00177186 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub AP00177187 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub AP00177188 006661 AP00177189 006661 AP00177190 001329 AP00177191 000213 AP00177192 005176 AP00177193 005526 AP00177194 003080 AP00177195 005441 AP00177196 000646 AP00177197 001940 AP00177198 005444 AP00177199 000509 VERIZON WIRELESS VERIZON WIRELESS VOLM, LIZA WA-XIE WEST END YMCA/WEST ENqD KIDS C WEST GROUP WHITTIER FERTILIZER WOMEN'S FITNESS CLUB WOOD, SUE WORLDCOM WRIGHT, ESTHER XEROX CORPORATION 12/o5/ol 12/o5/oi 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/oi i2/os/ol 12/o5/oi 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/oi i2/os/ol 12/o5/ol i2/os/ol 12/o5/oz 12/o5/oi 12/o5/ol i2/os/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol 12/os/ol 12/o5/ol 12/o5/ol R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 11 FINANCE---job: 66337 #S050 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Amount T!rpe Subs Rel To Note 2,035.00 MW OH 1,901.58 MW OH 1,148.49 MW OH 31.20 MW OH 3,564.18 MW OH 632.32 MW OH 5,417.08 MW OH 1,528.93 MW OH 0.00 VM 0.00 VM OH 6,613.35 MW OH · 200.08 MW OH 112.50 MW OH 587.77 MW OH 6,000.00 MW OH 5.38 MW OH 1,305.05 ~ ON 20.00 MW OH 400.00 MW OH 1,360.59 MW OH 33.00 MW OH Void Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB Void Void Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/05/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Pa~e 12 WED, DEC 05, 2001, 3:13 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FIND-NCE---job: 66337 #E050 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CRREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note GRAND TOTALS: Total Void Machine Written Total Void Hand Written Total Machine Written Total Hand Written Total Reversals Total Cancelled Checks GRAND TOTAL 0.00 0.00 599,555.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 599,555.03 Number of Checks Processed: 5 Nu~er of Checks Processed: 0 Number of Checks Processed: 268 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Nuraber of Checks Processed: 0 CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T B R CHECK REGISTER Page 1 WED, DEC 12, 2001, 12:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: FI~L~NCE---job: 67199 #S069 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name ========~= ========~=== ============================= AP00177264 000010 AP00177265 000001 AP00177266 002732 AP00177267 000007 AP00177268 006509 AP00177269 006309 AP00177270 000211 AP00177271 001098 AP00177272 004966 AP00177273 006199 AP00177274 001167 AP00177275 004237 AP00177276 003448 AP00177277 002693 AP00177278 001823 AP00177279 005807 AP00177280 001291 AP00177281 002437 AP00177282 021871 AP00177283 004102 AP00177284 004475 AP00177285 006301 AP00177286 001746 AP00177287 005584 AP00177288 005341 A ~=ND R TIRE SERVICE AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLETRONICS ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC AG ENGINEERING INC ALEXETER TEC~{NOLOGIES LLC A~LL~J4ERICANASPHALT CITIES ENTERPRISES ALL DATA SERVICES ALL WELDING D24TECH ELEVATOR SERVICES ARCH WIRELESS · ~RCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP ARCUS DATA SECURITY ASSOCIATED GROUP ALrDIO TECH BUSINESS BOOK SL~4M BD~RNES AND NOBLE BLUE OCEAN SOFTWARE INC BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS BROWN, AAS~ETTE BUCKND~4ANqDA~SOCIATES Date Check ~nount ====================== 12/12/01 1,479.53 MW OH 12/12/01 33.24 Mw OH 12/12/01 114.08 MW OH 12/12/01 177.36 Mw oH 12/12/01 1,224.00 ~ OH 12/12/01 1,920.00 MW OH 12/12/01 282.00 MW OR 12/12/01 472.50 MW OH 12/12/01 635.00 MW ON 12/12/01 495,713.82 MW OH 12/12/01 13,600.00 MW OH 12/12/01 1,800.00 MW OH 12/12/01 1,112.63 ~ OH 12/12/01 187.39 MW OH 12/12/01 1,587.10 MW OH 12/12/01 6,011.34 MW OH 12/12/01 472.00 MW OH 12/12/01 2,060.00 MW OH 12/12/01 149.00 MW OR 12/12/01 2,893.43 MW OH 12/12/01 308.04 MW OH 12/12/01 388.75 MW OH 12/12/01 1,867.93 ~ OH 12/12/01 44.00 MW OH 12/12/01 7,497.58 MW OH Type Subs Rel To Note =~== ==== ====== ====================================== Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/12/01 C H E C K WED, DEC 12, 2001, 12:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00177289 004803 AP00177290 004803 AP00177291 006470 AP00177292 005381 AP00177293 004323 AP00177294 000073 AP00177295 000074 CAPPO INC CAPPO INC CEV NFJLTIMEDIA CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC CITY RENTALS AP00177296 006464 COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES INC AP00177297 VOID.CON~I}~3 Void - Continued Stub AP00177298 000085 AP00177299 000105 AP00177300 002478 AP00177301 006302 AP00177302 003149 AP00177303 001290 AP00177304 003889 AP00177305 004366 AP00177306 005612 AP00177307 005322 AP00177308 005614 AP00177309 000229 AP00177310 000123 AP00177311 006556 AP00177312 004371 AP00177313 004879 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST DAN GUERRAAND ASSOCIATES DAPPER TIR~ CO DEAN INC,STUART DECK THE WD-LLS DEER CREEK CAR CAP~E CENTER DELOITTE AND TOUCHE DEMCO INC DIAZ, ALMA ENCASE GUIDANCE SOFTWARE INC ENGLEHARIDT 5~D, DAVID E EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FISHER SCIENTIFIC FLEET GLASS 1~/12/Ol 12/12/01 12/12/01 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/1~/Ol ~2/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol s2/12/Ol 12/s2/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/12/Ol 12/1~/Ol R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 2 FIN/tNCE---job: 67199 #S069 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note 1,870.00 MW OH 90.00 MW OH 250.00 MW OH 1,534.05 MW OH 4,576.45 MW OH 1,431.08 MW OH 393.22 MW OH 15,584.00 MW OH 0.00 VM OH 26,479.71 MW OH 4,935.00 MW OH 2,825.65 MW OH 1,400.00 MW OH 975.00 MW OH 14.00 MW OH 50,000.00 MW OH 905.25 MW OH 60.00 MW OH 2,005.00 MW OH 8.00 MW OH 678.93 MW OH 75.03 MW OH 5,170.90 MW OH 713.94 MW OH 200.91 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB Void Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/12/01 C H E C K WED, DEC 12, 2001, 12:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name AP00177314 005351 FOOTEILL AUTO BODY AP00177315 002840 AP00177316 001082 AP00177317 016982 AP00177318 006074 AP00177319 041287 AP00177320 000260 AP00177321 001600 AP00177322 004540 AP00177323 001245 AP00177324 003827 AP00177325 004913 AP00177326 005585 AP00177327 005699 AP00177328 005586 AP00177329 032113 AP00177330 004724 AP00177331 000437 AP00177332 001197 AP00177333 000158 AP00177334 001234 AP00177335 000161 AP00177336 004292 AP00177337 008010 AP00177338 000495 R E G I S T E R CHECK PdZGISTER Page 3 FINANCE---job: 67199 #S069 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note i2/12/oi FORD OF UPLAND INC 12/12/01 FR/L~iKLIN COVEY CO 12/12/01 FRASURE, MIC[L~EL 12/12/01 FLqfUsHI~L~, JL~DITH 12/12/01 FULLMER CONSTRUCTION 12/12/01 G /~D M BUSINESS INTERIORS 12/12/01 G M T DESIGNS 12/12/01 GALE GROUP,THE 12/12/01 GONSALVES DlqD SON, JOE A 12/12/01 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 12/12/01 GROLIER PDq~LISHING CO INC 12/12/01 ~L~J~MO~D A/qD MASING GENER/~L CO 12/12/01 HARA/~%MBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 12/12/01 H3LRRY'S JEWELRY 12/12/01 HEAF~tER TIRES GROUP INC 12/12/01 HI WAY SAFETY INC 12/12/01 HI~DERLITER DE LLAMAS ~ ASS 12/12/01 HINES EORTICULTURE 12/12/01 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 12/12/01 HOSE MAN INC 12/12/01 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 12/12/01 HRS USA 12/12/01 HUEST, JESSIC-~ 12/12/01 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 12/12/01 1,651.79 ~ OH 55.34 MW OH 50.37 MW 50.O0 MW OH 1,537.50 MW OH 1,000.00 MW OH 29,630.99 MW ON 44.74 MW OH 368.62 ~5~ OH 5,000.00 MW OH 175.39 NW OH 220.12 MW OH 22.50 MW OR 307.38 MW OH 34.01 MW OH 46.00 MW OH 150.00 MW OH 24,969.07 MW OH 12.00 MW OH 582.15 MW OH 23.21 MW OH 78.89 MW OH 12.35 MW OH 544.18 MW OH 606.19 MW OH Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/12/01 C H E C K WED, DEC 12, 2001, 12:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name AP00177339 004254 IBM CORPORATION AP00177340 003276 AP00177341 004878 AP00177342 006582 AP00177343 005682 AP00177344 000092 AP00177345 002315 AP00177346 090933 AP00177347 002507 AP00177348 004424 AP00177349 032043 AP00177350 031831 AP00177351 006193 AP00177352 004982 AP00177353 002633 AP00177354 000321 AP00177355 004755 AP00177356 003711 AP00177357 000849 AP00177358 000197 AP00177359 005589 AP00177360 005884 AP00177351 004189 AP00177362 005662 AP00177363 003156 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS IRMA INLAND FAIR HOUSINGAND MEDIA IN--hAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GRO INLAND VALLEy DAILY BULLETIN IN-LAND WHOLESALE NURSERY INTERSTATE BATTERIES INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC IRON MOUNTAIN J~/gECK, LINDA JAYOUNG INTERNATIONAL CO KLAMATH BAy KORANDA CONSTRUCTION LAM, JACK IJ%NDSCAPE WEST INC LARSON, KIRK LAVERTU, JUDITH LAWSON PRODUCTS INC LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LEE WAYNE CORPORATION LILBLq{N CORPOR3%TIOW LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO INC LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL CO LUS LIGHTHOUSE INC Date Check Amount 12/12/01 838.99 MW 1~/12/01 351.10 MW OH 12/12/01 92.00 NW 12/12/01 1,796.87 MW OH 12/12/01 3,858.23 MW OH 12/12/01 17,926.62 MW OH 12/12/01 34.93 MW OH 12/12/01 953.26 MW OH 12/12/01 11,725.00 MW OH 12/12/01 1,630.13 MW OH 12/12/01 41.05 MW OH 12/12/01 7.44 MW OH 12/12/01 362.83 MW OH 12/12/01 535.00 MW OH 12/12/01 100.00 MW OH 12/12/01 1,658.00 MW OH 12/12/01 93.74 MW OH 12/12/01 60.00 MW OW 12/12/01 106.67 MW OH 12/12/01 57.00 MW OH 12/12/01 485.52 MW OH 12/12/01 8,937.94 MW OH 12/12/01 773.78 MW OH 12/12/01 763.14 MW OH 12/12/01 20.25 MW OH R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 4 FINANCE---job: 67199 #S069 ..... prog: CK200 <1.37>--report id: CKREG--- Type Subs Rel To Note CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/12/01 C H E C K WED, DEC 12, 2001, 12:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00177364 002587 LUTTERMAN, GEORGE 12/12/01 AP00177365 031458 AP00177366 000072 AP00177367 004727 AP00177368 003871 AP00177369 001025 AP00177370 002198 AP00177371 006170 AP00177372 005852 AP00177373 001198 AP00177374 003860 AP00177375 001171 AP00177376 001020 AP00177377 000842 AP00177378 005588 AP00177379 002248 AP00177380 006687 AP00177381 002361 AP08177382 005590 AP00177383 000523 AP00177384 001505 AP00177385 000235 AP00177386 001441 AP00177387 006287 AP00177388 004529 ~CRO PRO 12/12/01 MARK CHRIS INC 12/12/01 Fk~RSHALL PLUMBING 12/12/01 MATT'S H~RDWARE 12/12/01 MCNL~STER CARR SUPPLY COMP~ 12/12/01 MICROAGE COMP~E~RT 12/12/01 MIDWEST TAPE 12/12/01 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS MOBILE MINI INC 12/12/01 MOTORO~ CO~ ~ BLEC INC 1~/12/01 MO~AIN VIEW G~SS ~ MIlO 12/12/01 MO~AIN VIEW S~LL ENG ~PAI 12/12/01 ~PA A~O P~TS 12/12/01 NEWPORT T~FFIC ST~IES 12/12/01 ~Z, BE~ETTE 12/12/01 OFFICE DEPOT 12/12/01 OLIVEI~ POOL P~STERING 12/12/01 OWEN ELECTRIC 12/12/01 PACIFIC BELL 12/12/01 ~SAC X~/X~/0Z R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 5 FIND~NCE---job: 67199 #S069 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check ~Jaount Type Subs Rel To Note 1,792.00 MW OH 178.20 MW OH 450.58 MW OH 151.60 MW OH 16.47 MW OH 69.63 MW OH 38.58 MW OH 37.63 MW OH 515.80 MW OH 7.50 ~ OH~ 250.01 MW OH 3,653.39 MW OH 31.35 MW OH 90.71 MW OH 12.50 MW OH 1,199.38 MW OH 143.36 MW OH 110.00 MW OH 33.00 MW OH 1,995.25 MW OH 9.00 MW OH 808.60 MW OH 1,479.98 MW OH 41,149.44 MW OH 22,461.25 MW OH CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/12/01 C H E C K WED, DEC 12, 2001, 12:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--leg: GL JL--loc: Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date AP00177389 000757 PEP BOYS 12/12/01 R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 6 FIN/%NCE---job: 67199 #S069 ..... prog: CK200 <l.37>--report id: C~_REG--- Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note 75.99 MW OH AP00177390 006205 PETEP34AN LUMBER 12/12/01 194.61 MW OH AP00177391 004267 PETES ROA~) SERVICE 12/12/01 593.66 MW OH AP00177392 002987 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYS 12/12/01 608.80 MW OH AP00177393 006211 PIONEER ST~lqDARD ELECTRONICS 12/12/01 6,820.24 MW OH AP00177394 006206 PI~%N-NING CENTER, THE 12/12/01 4,084.91 MW OH AP00177395 006681 POMONA INLAND V~J~LEY COUNCIL 12/12/01 513.00 MW OH AP00177396 001049 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 12/12/01 715.38 MW OH AP00177397 005592 PRECISION PAINTING 12/12/01 7.85 MW OH AP00177398 000065 pRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 12/12/01 14.00 MW OH AP00177399 005994 FVP COMMUNICATIONS INC 12/12/01 81.46 MW OH AF00177400 000251 R ~2qD R AUTOMOTIVE 12/12/01 2,675.79 MW OH AP00177401 002705 R H E INC 12/12/01 64.00 MW OH AP00177402 001038 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC 12/12/01 525.00 MW OH AP00177403 004130 REM LOCK ~2~D KEY SERVICE 12/12/01 126.38 MW OH AP00177404 005914 KEXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPL 12/12/01 13.86 MW OH AP00177405 000443 R/~I CONSULTING 12/12/01 3,363.75 MW OH AP00177406 000276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 12/12/01 1,199.79 MW OH AP00177407 005595 RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS 12/12/01 758.56 MW OH AP00177408 003137 SAFETY CENTER 12/12/01 1,220.00 MW OH AP00177409 001298 S~ BER~ COUNTy ASSESSORS OFF 12/12/01 312.00 MW OH AP00177410 000301 SAN BERN COUNTy SHERIFFS 12/12/01 82.00 MW OH AP00177411 006604 SCHNEIDER, DANIEL 12/12/01 53.88 MW OH AP00177412 000317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 12/12/01 110,124.97 MW OH AP00177413 000317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 12/12/01 791.94 MW Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/12/01 C H E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 7 WED, DEC 12, 2001, 12:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 67199 #S069 ..... pro~: CR200 <l.37>--report id: CEREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note AP00177414 000319 HO CALIF GAS COMP/~%IY 12/12/01 1,964.58 MW OH AP00177415 VOID.CONTINU Void - Continued Stub AP00177416 VOID.CONTINq3 Void - Continued Stub 12/12/01 0.00 VM OH 12/12/Ol o.oo vM OH AP00177417 001432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12/12/01 30,470.03 MW OH AP00177418 003597 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12/12/01 7,140.93 MW OB AP00177419 005281 STERICYCLE INC 12/12/01 245.61 MW OH AP00177420 004733 SUNRISE FORD 12/12/01 101.37 MW OH AP00177421 005599 SWEEEDE, YOKO 12/12/01 16.00 MW OH AP00177422 011078 TEIENES ENGINEERING INC 12/12/01 11.50 MW OH AP00177423 005605 TRUE VINE FELLOWSHIP 12/12/01 80.00 MW OH AP00177424 003388 TRUGREEN LD~qDCAR~ ~GIONAL 12/12/01 3,165.00 MW OH AP00177425 005155 U S B/~NK TRUST 12/12/01 2,600.00 ~4W OH AP00177426 002958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 12/12/01 338.00 MW OH AP00177427 003437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 12/12/01 800.74 MW OH AP00177428 000765 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST, INC 12/12/01 108.00 MW OH AP00177429 006004 UNITEK TECHNOLOGY INC 12/12/01 25,121.95 MW OH AP00177430 004558 US GUARDS CO INC 12/12/01 53,200.00 ~4W OH AP00177431 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 12/12/01 366.21 MW OH AP00177432 000137 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 12/12/01 7,055.45 MW OH AP00177433 006661 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/12/01 246.93 MW OH AP00177434 003422 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 12/12/01 89.71 MW OH AP00177435 004220 WILSON, BRITT 12/12/01 100.00 MW OH AP00177436 005658 X PECT FIRST AID AND SAFETY 12/12/01 111.00 MW OH AP00177437 000509 XEROX CORPORATION 12/12/01 150.18 MW OH AP00177438 004405 YWCA OF THE WEST END 12/12/01 712.64 MW OH Void Void Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB Payee Name different in Check DB CITY OF RC IFAS (PROD) 12/12/01 C R E C K R E G I S T E R CHECK REGISTER Page 8 WED, DEC 12, 2001, 12:47 PM --req: KFINCHER--le~: GL JL--loc: FINANCE---job: 67199 #S069 ..... proD: CK200 <l.37>--report id: CKREG--- Check Payee ID. Payee Name Date Check Amount Type Subs Rel To Note G R A N D T O T A L S: ====================================== Total Void Machine Written Total Void Hand Written Total Machine Written Total Hand Written Total Reversals 'Total Cancelled Checks GRAND TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1129,791.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 3 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Number of Checks Processed: 172 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Number of Checks Processed: 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary November 30, 2001 City of Rancho Cucemonga Investments Local Agency Investment Funds Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equh.~. 17,944,362.76 17,944,362.76 17,944,362.76 13.86 I I 3.478 3.526 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Treasury Securities - Coupon Mortgage Backed Securities Investments 1,515,000.00 1,514,477.17 1,515,000.00 1.17 180 178 1.950 1.977 108.100,000.00 110,499,411.77 108,040,868.75 83.43 1,663 1,265 5.616 5.694 2,000,000.00 2.014,375.00 1,995,937.50 1.54 731 61 6.396 6.485 130.65 130.65 129.71 0.00 5,426 31 8.219 8.333 129,559,493.4'1 131,972,757.35 129,496,298.72 100.00% 1,401 1,058 5.289 5.36? Cash and Accrued Interest Passbook/Checking 394,878.25 394,878.25 394,878.25 I 1 (not included in yield calculations) 1.973 2.000 AccnJed Interest at Purchase 4,152.78 4,152.78 Subtotal 399,031.03 399,031.03 Total Cash and Investments 129,954,371.66 132,371,788.38 129,895,329.75 t ,401 1,058 5.289 5 Total Earnings Nov~rF, ber 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 593,901.55 3,060,736.25 Average Daily Balance 133,293,593.95 t32,546,501.60 Effective Rate of Return 5.42% 5.51% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted November 21, 2001. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Adminisb'afive Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides suffldent cash flow liquidity to meet the next six monf~s estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained f~om (IDC)-InteractJve Data Corporation pdcing service. (,F rossi, Treasure~ The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the pdor month's end is provided under the City offidal Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond documents Portfolio CITY ~,.~ Run Date: 12/12/2001 - 19:15 CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V5.02f Average CUSIP Investment ~t Issuer Balance Local Agency Investment Funds 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal and Average 22,877,096.09 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments November 30, 2001 Date Pay Value Manet Value Book Value 17.944,362.76 17,944,362.76 17,944,382.76 17,aaz,_'y~_2.76 Page 2 3.526 3.478 I 3.478 I Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 06050EB38 1116 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal and Average 1,515,000.00 11/29/2091 1,515,000.00 1,514,477.17 1,515.000.00 1,5t5,000.00 1,514,477.17 1,5t5,000.00 1.950 178 05/28/2002 1.909 178 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331RAA3 00988 31331RDX0 00909 3133IRMA0 01004 31331HOE2 1075 31331LHD3 1100 31331LKE7 1107 31331LMP0 tt09 31331LSG4 1112 31331LTQ1 1115 3133M2US4 01003 3133M6NE4 01035 3133M75D4 01038 3133M86L3 01043 3133M94J8 01050 3133M96K3 01053 3133MARK7 1059 3133MEHV2 1062 3133MCX34 1076 3133MFBP2 1103 3133MF7E2 1105 3133MFGAO 1106 3133MGBV7 1110 3133MJL81 1114 312923GH2 1078 312923MQ5 1081 312923MJ1 1082 312923SM8 1086 312923ZB4 1096 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 03/27/1 097 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/17/1997 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/06/1998 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 01/24/2091 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/24/2001 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/14/2001 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 07/18/200t FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/29/2001 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/28/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/06/1998 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/08/1998 FEDERAL HOME LOAN EANK 01/21/1999 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/25/1999 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/17/1999 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/28/1999 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 02/25/2000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/25/2000 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/24/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/30/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/06/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 05/14/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/24/2091 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1t/20/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 02/14/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/20/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/21/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 04/10/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/08/2001 2.0(X),000.00 2,030,215.76 2,000,000,00 2,090,009.00 2,052,409.97 1,099,375.00 2,000,000.00 2,079,043,88 2,000,000.00 2,0~O,000.00 2.073,750.00 2,000,009,00 2,000,000,00 2,032.500.00 1,991,250.00 3,000,000.00 3,057,187.50 2,997,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,045,625.00 t ,997,812.50 5,000,000.00 4,995,312.50 5,090,009.00 4,000,000.00 4,022,500.00 4,000,000.00 2,090,000.00 2,091,875.09 2,000,000.00 1,090,000.00 1,046,250.00 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,087,187.50 3,000.000.00 3.000,000.00 3.193,125.00 2,984,531.25 2,009,000.00 2,081,250.00 1,095,875.00 2,000,000.00 2,023,125.00 1,099,687.50 2,090.000.00 2,053,750.00 1,094,375.00 3,000,000.00 3,112,500.00 2,997,187.50 2,090,000.00 2,080,625.00 1,999,062.50 2,009,000.00 2,080,090.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,090.00 2,002,500.00 2,090,000.00 2,009,000.00 2,047,500.00 1,099,375.00 3,109.000.00 3,104,843.75 3,098.450.00 2,000,090.00 2.014,133.91 2,000,090.00 1,000,000.00 1,032,211.00 1,000,000.00 4,090,000.00 4,035,097.75 4,000.000.00 4,000,000.00 4,120,691.53 4,000.009.00 6,000,000.00 6,143,23t .51 6,000,000.00 6.620 6.529 116 03/27/2002 6.240 6.162 228 07/17/2002 6.220 6.135 401 01/05/2093 5.730 5.652 1,150 01/24/2005 5.600 5.624 1,626 05/15/2006 5.560 5.512 1,291 06/14/2005 6.750 5.696 1,690 07/15/2006 4.125 4.068 1,245 04/29/2005 4.750 4.685 1,458 11/28/2005 6.230 6.t45 401 01/06/2003 5.530 5.454 737 12/08/2003 5.510 5.435 781 01/21/2004 5.755 5.676 2~6 09/25/2002 6.230 6.265 929 06/17/2004 6.480 6.428 940 06/26/2004 7.000 6.910 451 02/25/2003 7.890 7.850 1,262 05/16/2005 5.760 5.707 1,150 01/24/2005 5.800 5.731 1,641 05/30/2006 5.750 5.671 1.648 06/06/2006 Porffo(io CITY CUSIP Investment ~ Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 312923ZY4 1098 3129245H7 1113 31384F096 01018 31364~T1 1065 3136~KR36 1077 31359MGV9 1079 3136FOAL6 1085 3136FODVV9 1088 3136FOEVO 1091 3136FOEW8 t092 3136FOLU4 1101 3136FOMC3 1t04 3136FORV6 1108 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details. Investments November 30, 2001 Issuer Balance Date FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/09/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/14/2001 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/10/1998 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 06/06/2000 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 02/05/2001 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 03/05/2001 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/04/2001 FEDERAL NATL MTO ASSN 04/11/2001 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2001 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/24/2001 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/24/2001 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 05/05/2~01 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 07/15/2001 Subtotal and Average 105,013,069.17 Par Value Market Value Book Value 5,000,000.00 5,061,804.96 5,000,000.00 3.000,000.00 2,971,370.54 2,997,187.50 2,000,000.00 2,0~0,949.71 2,000.000.00 3.000,000.00 3,090.000.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,096,250.00 3,999,375.00 3.000,000.00 3,020.625.00 3,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 4,126,250.00 3,994,375.00 2.000,000.00 2,026,875.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,028,750.00 1,999,200.00 3,000,000.00 3,100,312.50 2,997.000.00 2,000,000.00 2,091.875.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,625.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,Da3,750.00 1,998,750.00 Page 3 5.700 5.622 1,620 05/09/2006 4.150 4.118 1,444 11/14/2005 6.125 6.041 534 05/19/2003 7.875 7.767 1,283 06/06/2005 5.625 5.553 978 08/05/2004 5.450 5.374 803 02/12/2004 5.300 5.259 1.579 05/29/2006 5.650 5.573 1,592 04111/2006 5.750 5.680 1,598 04/17/2006 5.510 5.457 1,598 04117/20~6 5.710 5.632 1,635 05/24/2006 6.000 5.918 1,647 06/05/2006 5,750 5.685 1,677 07/05/2006 5.616 1,265 Treasury Securities - Coupon 9128275X6 1058 TREASURY NOTE Subtotal and Average 01/31/2000 2,000,000.00 2,014,375.00 1,995,937.50 2,000,000.00 2,014,378.00 1,995,937.50 6.375 6.396 61 01/31/3002 6.396 6t Backed Securities 31340IVAN7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG CORP. Subtotal and Average 100~.9 02/23/1987 130.65 130.65 129.71 8.000 8.219 31 01/0112002 130,65 130.65 129.7t 129,559,493.41 131,972,757.35 129,496,298.72 8.219 31 5.289 t,058 Portfolio CITY Date: 12/12/'2001 ~ 19:15 CP PM (PRF_FM2) 5ymRept VS.02f CUSIP Investment # Issuer Cash Accounts 00180 BANK OF AMERICA City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash November 30, 2001 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value 394,878.25 Mart(et Value 394,878.25 Stated Book Value Rate 394,878.25 2.000 Page 4 1,891,790.90 394,878.25 394,878.25 394,878.25 Acc;ued Interest at Purchase 4,152.78 4,152.78 Subtotal 399,031.03 399,031.03 133,293,593.95 129,954,371.66 132,371,788.38 129,895,329.75 5.289 1,058 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRepl VS.02f City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type November 1, 2001 through November 30, 2001 Beginning CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal 21,944.362.76 Stated Transaction Rate Date 3.526 6,800,000.00 10,800,000.00 Ending 6,800,000.00 lO?nn.nn _n.o0 17,944,362.76 Page 5 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal 0.00 t ,548,530.33 394,878.25 Certific~[es of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 06050EZF5 1111 06050EB38 1116 BANK OF AMERICA 3.400 11/29/2001 BANK OF AMERICA 1.950 11/29/2001 Subtotal 1.5t5,000.00 0.00 1,615,000.00 1,515,000.00 0.00 1,5t 5,000.00 t ,515,800.00 1,815,000.00 Federal A~=.~,y Issues. Coupon 31331LGR3 1095 31331L(~R3 1097 31331LTQI 1115 312923H99 1102 312924SH7 1113 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 5.950 11~8/2001 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 5.950 11/08/2001 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 4.750 11/28/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 4.250 111201200t FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 6.000 t 1/30/2001 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 4.150 11/14/2001 Subtotal t 04,945~31.25 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 3,098,450.00 0.00 0.00 3,Go0,000.00 2,997,187.50 0.00 10,095,837.50 7,000,000.00 ! n~_._n~. _,868.75 Treasury Securities - Coupon Subtotal 1,995,937.50 1,995,937.50 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401ww7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. Subtotal 66.67 8.000 11/15/2001 0.O0 -63.04 0.00 ~3.04 129.71 Total t32,344,806.76 18,410,637.50 20A63~67~9 129,891,176.97 Portfolio CITY %~Run Date: 12/12~2001 - 19:15 CP ~j~ PM (PRF_PM3) SyrnRepl VS.02f City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended October 31, 2001 Bond Issue Assessment District No 93-1 Masi Plaza PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Trustee and/or Pavino Ausnt US Bank US Bank Purchase Account Name Investment Date Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Reserve Fund Cash N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A Expense Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First Amedcan Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 Cash N/A Redemption Fund First.american Treasury Obligation 7/111999 Cash N/A Revenue Fund First,american Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 Cash N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obl~jation 1/16/2001 Cash N/A Maturity Date N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A N/A* N/A Yield Cost Value 2.20% $ 257,311.00 N/A 0.78 2.20% 243,718.00 N/A 0.05 2.20% 2,932.00 N/A 0.81 2.20% . N/A 2.20% N/A 2.20% N/A 2.20% N/A 2.20% N/A 2.20% N/A $ 503,962.64 $ 0.04 580,527.00 0.50 1,090,591.00 0.26 216,062.00 0.52 TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS W]TH FISCAL AGENTS * Nots: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. . $ 1,887,181.32 $ 2,391,143.96 ~ i:~finencelCash with FiScal Agents.xl$ ~ 12/5~2001 4:31 PM I~ a N C H 0 C U C a M 0 N G a ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT $ I epor DA'~E: January 2,2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer .I Lucinda E. Hackett, Associate Engineer--,~ APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM LION STREET TO HELLMAN AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1100176 (MEASURE I) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation from Lion Street to Hellman Avenue and approve the Attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS: Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation scope of work in general consists of, but not limited to, cold planning, crack sealing, rubberized overlay, asphalt paving, re-striping and pavement markings. The project is to be funded from Measure 'T' funds, Account No. 11763035650/1100176. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301 (c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for Base Line Road Pavement Rehab is $151,700. Legal advertising is scheduled for January 8, 2002 and January 15, 2002, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 22, 2002. R?pect~ully submitted, City Engineer WJO:LEH:Ieh Attachments 2? VICINITY MAP ~.r, oject i~e e, 24TH ST '~ ~ I ,.,11 .INE RD 0 6TH ST BNSF RR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ BASE LINE ROAD (lq~OM LION ST TO nm.~.u~ AY) PAVEMENT P~HABII,ITATION NoT.S. RESOLUTION 02 -~)~) / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM LION STREET TO HELLMAN AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM LION STREET TO HELLMAN AVENUE". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, January 22, 2002, sealed bids or proposals for the "BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM LION STREET TO HELLMAN AVENUE" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of BASE LINE ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM LION STREET TO HELLMAN AVENUE". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to previsions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the previsions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. RESOLUTION NO. Page 3 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the Iow bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, er any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract RESOLUTION NO. Page 4 which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the date and at the time of the submittal of the Bidder's Proposal the Prime Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a combination of Specialty Class "C" licenses sufficient to cover all the work to be performed by the Prime Contractor in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the off~ce of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon wdtten request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. Page 5 Dated this 2nd day of January, 2002. Publish Dates: January 8, 2002 and January 15, 2002 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, this 2"d day of January, 2002. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 2nd day of January, 2002. Executed this 2nd day of January 2, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: January 8, 2002 and January 15, 2002 R a N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINE'ERING DEPARTMENT S af:f Report DATE: TO: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer A. Dyer, Associate Engineer--/(~ Jerry A REQUEST TO SUMMARILY VACATE AN EASEMENT FOR STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND RELATED PURPOSES ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE BETVVEEN 5TM STREET AND 6TM STREET RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution summarily ordering the vacation of an easement for streets, highways and related purposes along the east side of Hermosa Avenue between 5m and 6th Street. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In conjunction with the, City's construction project on Hermosa Avenue from 4*h Street to south of 8th .Street, an easement was obtained from a property owner for a strip of street right-of-way along Hermosa Avenue. The Property Owner now feels that easement description was ambiguous. In order to resolve the issue, the property owner has executed a new easement with the understanding that the City will vacate the previously recorded questionable easement. The Planning Commission made the finding that the vacation conforms with the General Plan on December 12, 2001. Section 8330 of the Streets and Highways Code states local agencies may summarily vacate a street or highway that has been superseded by relocation. Res_~jze~tfully submitted, WilliAm/& O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAD Attachments: Vicinity Map, Exhibit "A" & "B" (legal description), Resolution, and V-185 Map 2~TH ~T 6TH ~T ~ E/~ I-IEf~MO~A 5/0 ~TI-I 5TI~EET 4T~ 5T ONTAR, IO CIT'~ LIMIT NTS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 SUMMARY VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND RELATED PURPOSES VICINITY MAP RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND RELATED PURPOSES ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE BETWEEN 5TM STREET AND 6TM STREET WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street hereinafter more particularly described; and. WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the easement for streets, highways and related purposes recorded on October 25, 2000, as Document No. 20000388863, is unnecessary because it has been superceded by relocation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating that easement along the east side of Hermosa Avenue between 5th Street and 6th Street as shown on map V-185 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description and plat map, which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and "B", respectively, and by reference made a part hereofi Section 2: That from and after the date of the resolution is recorded, said easement along Hermosa Avenue no longer constitutes an easement for streets, highways and related purposes. Section 3: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino County, California. .s~.so,29.w ~t 6TH ;TREETu ~t GRAPHIC SCALE STREET 200' 210-072-37 DATA NO DELTA/BR6 LEN6TH L1 N89 ° 52' 23"W 36.00' L2. NO0 ' 07' .'57"E 14.00' 1_3 N57' 24' 29"E 29.4.5' L4 N89' 4.1 '39"E 11.00' 1.5 NO0' 18' 21"W 30.00' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOWER HERMOSA AVENUE PHASE 1 SUMMARY VACATION OF AN EASEMENT FOR STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND RELATED PURPOSES MAP V- 18 5 EXHIBIT "A" STREET DEDICATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN: 0210-072- 37 THE WEST 1/2 OF LOTS 18 AND 23, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP I SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS IN THE COUNT~; OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 18, THENCE SOUTH 89°52'23'EAST, 69.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH00°07'37"WEST, 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00°07'37"WEST, 14.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH57°24'29"" WEST, 29.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°41'39" WEST, 11.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°18'21" WEST, 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°52'23" EAST, 36.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO THE REMAINING WESTERLY 11.00 FEET OF SAID LOTS 18 AND 23. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 5.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 23. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY THE DEED RECORDED JULY 17, 1962 IN BOOK 5734, PAGE 806, OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BY THAT CERTAIN FINAL ORDER IN CONDEMNATION DATED MARCH 2, 1982, RECORDED MARCH 15, 1982, INSTRUMENT NO. 82-050458, OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING TEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN 6TH STREET AND HERMOSA AVENUE. AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED HERETO, AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS DIRECT SUPERVISION. DUANE D. HOLMES, P.L.S. 6168 REGISTRATION EXPIRES MARCH 31, 2002 G:~$u~e~DeDt~EXHIBIT.do c PREPARED 0ATE BY ME OR UNDER MY N89"50'2g'Y/. EXH I B IT 44' 40' I L1 210-072-37 GRAPHIC SCALE 50" 1oo' 200' ' N r-I RRI -~-R E F~KE, IN~. CIVIL AND LAND SURVEYORS 6ag N. TUST[N AVENUE SUITE 750 SANTA ANA CA. 92705-,~756 TEL (714-) 975-2230 FAX (714) 975-226.3 http://www. NORRISREPKE. com nz ~ 66~14 5.0~ DATA NO DELTA/BRG LENGTH L1 N89 ° 52' 23"W ,,36.00' L2 NOO°O7'37"E 14.00' L3 N57 ° 24' 29"E 29. ,-1-5' L4 N89'41 '39"E 11.00' L5 N00' 18'21"W ,.:30.00' H ERM D-~A AVENUE TH E CITY OF ~AN C H 0 C ~J CAM 0 N GA $ Repo FROM: BY: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager '~' January 2, 2002 AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) INGERSOLL-RAND DD30 SELF PROPELLED DOUBLE DRUM VIBRATORY ASPHALT COMPACTOR AND TRAILER FROM INGERSOLL-RAND EQUIPMENT, OF IRWINDALE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,957.15, FUNDED FROM FUND 1712-001-5603 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of one (1) Ingersoll-Rand DD30 Self Propelled Double Drum Vibratory Asphalt Compactor and Trailer from ingersoll-Rand Equipment, of Irwindale, in the amount of $36,957.15, funded from fund 1712-001-5603. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council approved the purchase of this vehicle as identified in the fiscal year 2001/2002 budget document under account 1712-001-5603. Maintenance provided specifications to Purchasing for the asphalt compactor and trailer. Purchasing prepared a Request for Bid and sent it to four (4) vendors. Two (2) responses were received. After analysis of the bids by Greg Gunski, Maintenance Supervisor, and Purchasing Staff, it has been determined that Ingersoll-Rand is the lowest responsive and responsible vendor that meets the specifications required by the Engineering Department, Streets Maintenance Division. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director TH E CITY OF [~AN C[~ 0 CU CAM 0 N CA St12fReport FROM: BY: DATE: SUBJECI': Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager /'~ January 2, 2002 AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) FORD F-350 DUAL REAR WHEEL SUPER DUTY CREW CAB STAKE BED TRUCK FROM SUNRISE FORD~ OF FONTANA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $35~809.33~ FUNDED FROM FUND 1134-303- 5604 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of one (1) Ford F-350 Dual Rear Wheel Super Duty Crew Cab Stake Bed Truck from Sunrise Ford, of Fontana, in the amount of $35,809.33, funded from fund 1134-303-5604. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council approved the purchase of this vehicle as identified in the fiscal year 2001/2002 budget document under account 1134-303-5604. Maintenance provided specifications to Purchasing for the truck. Purchasing prepared a Request for Bid and sent it to eleven (11) vendors. Eight (8) responses were received. After analysis of the bids by Greg Gunski, Maintenance Supervisor, and Purchasing Staff, it has been determined that Sunrise Ford is the lowest, most responsive and responsible vendor that meets the specifications required by the Engineering Department, Parks Division. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director T H E C I T Y 0 F I~ANCflO Cg CAM ONGA S tffReport FROM: BY: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager January 2, 2002 AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (l) ,~OHN DEERE 5220 UTILITY TRACTOR FROM A. A. EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO. INC.~ OF MONTCLAIR~ IN THE AMOUNT OF $25~877.40~ FUNDED FROM FUND 1712- 001-5604 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of one (1) John Deere 5220 Utility Tractor from A. A. Equipment Rentals Co., Inc., of Montclair, in the amount of $25,877.40, funded from fund 1712-001-5604. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council approved the purchase of this vehicle as identified in the fiscal year 2001/2002 budget document under account 1712-001-5604, to replace unit #539. Maintenance provided specifications to Purchasing for the utility tractor. Purchasing prepared a Request for Bid and sent it to seven (7) vendors. Three (3) responses were received. After analysis of the bids by Rex Whitney, Maintenance Supervisor, and Purchasing Staff, it has been determined that A. A. Equipment Rentals Co., Inc. is the lowest, most responsive and responsible vendor that meets the specifications required by the Engineering Department. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director T H E C I T Y © F I~AN C H 0 C U CA~I 0 N GA SlaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Britt W. Wilson, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 42 - TRAFFIC CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT Recommendation Approve the attached Resolution in support of Proposition 42, the Traffic Congestion Improvement Act. BackRround The San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) sent a letter (attached) to the City requesting that the City pass a resolution in support of Proposition 42, the Traffic Congestion Improvement Act ("Proposition 42"). According to the SANBAG correspondence, Proposition 42, if approved by the voters in March 2002, "constitutionally protects and dedicates to transportation purposes an estimated $1.5 billion annually in sales tax on gasoline revenues that have been placed heretofore in the state General Fund." Proposition 42's enabling legislation and placement on the March 2002 ballot is a direct result of the nearly unanimous passage of ACA 4 (Assembly Constitutional Amendment) by the Assembly and the Senate this past legislative season. The League of California Cities has also taken a support position for both ACA 4, when it was being considered by the legislature, as well as for Proposition 42. If the City Council approves the resolution, staff would also recommend sending a "support/endorsement form" to a coalition of agencies and groups advocating the passage of Proposition 42. The City Council approved a similar action on December 5, 2001 when it considered and approved a resolution in support of Proposition 40 (Parks Bond Act). Page 2 January 2, 2002 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION IN SUPPORTING THE PASSAGE OF PROPOSITION 42 - TRAFFIC CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT If passed by the voters in March 2002, Proposition 42 is anticipated to provide over $33 million for transportation projects in Rancho Cucamonga beginning in fiscal year 2008-09. Staff discussed these potential new funds with the Engineering Department and they indicated that these funds could be used by the City to provide costly upgrades to our infrastructure system, including the rehabilitation of pavement to extend the life and safety of our streets, and the widening to their ultimate width of various major streets in the City to accommodate increased traffic. An example of such a project would be the widening of Haven Avenue to accommodate traffic from the new Route 30/210 freeway. The cost of this project is estimated to be approximately $5 million. For the reasons stated above, it is recommended that the City Council approve the resolution in support of Proposition 42. Britt W. Wilson Management Analyst III City Manager's Office Chris McKenzie, League of California Cities Darren M. Kettle, Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative Affairs Ted Green, Taxpayers for Traffic Relief/Yes on Proposition 42/ACA 4 SANBAG CORRESPONDENCE San Bernardino Associated Governmc ' s San Bernardino County Transportation Commission San Bernardino County Transportation Authority San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies 472 North Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, California 92401-1421 (909) 884-8276 FAX: (909) 885-4407 December 5, 2001 RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMiN!STR~T!ON Mr. Jack Lam City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 DEC 07 2001 7',8,9,i 0,i i, l Dear ~J~'~: Today the San Bemardino Associated Governments Board of Directors adopted the attached Resolution of support for Proposition 42 and encouraging SANBAG' member jurisdictions to take similar actions. If approved by the California voters on March 5, 2002, Proposition 42 constitutionally protects and dedicates to transportation purposes an estimated $1.5 billion annually in sales tax on gasoline revenues that have heretofore been placed in the state General Fund. Transportation programs in San Bemardino County, including local streets and roads, public transit, and county transportation commission major projects will receive an estimated $1.4 billion in the first 20-years commencing with fiscal year 2008-09. Your jurisdiction will receive $33,301,751 over that same period for your local streets and roads program. In recognition of this positive impact on our transportation system and the formal request of the SANBAG Board of its' members, I would respectfully request that you present to your council a Proposition 42 support resolution for their consideration. I have enclosed a sample resolution and support form for your convenience. ! xvould be happy to e-mall these documents to you if you would prefer. Please transmit the approved resolution and signed support form to the name and address at the bottom of the support form. If you have any questions please contact me at (909) 884-8276. Sincerely, Darren M. Kettle Director of Intergovernmental and Legislative Affairs Enclosures Cities of: Adelanto, Barstow, Big Bear Lake, Otino, Chino Hills, Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Hesperia, Highland, Loma Linda, Montciair Needles, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands, Rialto, San Bernardino, Twentynine Palm~, Upland, Victorville, Yucaipa Towns of: Apple Valley, Yucca Valley County of San Bernardino q t'7 / RESOLUTION NO. 02-008' RESOLUTION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS IN SUPPORT OF ACA 4/PROPOSITION 42 (THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT WHEREAS, ACA 4/Proposition 42 (The Traffic Congestion Improvement Act) will provide traffic congestion relief with no new taxes by allocating exiting gasoline taxes revenues estimated at approximately $1 billion annually for public transit, local road repair and improvements to local and state roads and highways; and WHEREAS, ACA 4/Proposition 42 is based on the principle that taxes paid at the gas pump should be used for transportation purposes and would dedicate those funds for transportation purposes; and WHEREAS, all projects would be subject to standard accounting practices to ensure they are delivered on time and on budget; and WHEREAS, traffic congestion is bad now and will get worse unless ACA4/Proposition 42 is passed, jeopardizing California's economic recovery and costing Californians billions of dollars every year in wasted time, excess fuel and shipping delays; and WHEREAS, six thousand of our bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient of don't meet highway design standards, and planned improvements to our bus and rail commuter systems lag behind schedule; and WHEREAS, cities and counties lack funds to fix potholes and properly maintain local streets and roads; and WHEREAS, traffic is paralyzing travel with Los Angeles now ranked the number one most congested urban area in the country, San Francisco/Oakland second, San Diego sixth and Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino/Riverside following close behind; and Approved San Bernardino Associated Governments Board of Directors Date: December 5, 2001 Moved: Eaves Second: Valles ln Favor: 3~ O~os~ O Abstained: O R02-008-DMK.DOC Resolution No. 02-008 December 5, 2001 Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the state's legislative analyst's office recommended legislators come up with an additional, reliable and ongoing funding source to tackle California's ailing transportation system THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the San Bemardino Associated Governments SUPPORTS ACA 4/Proposition 42, The Traffic Congestion Improvement Act; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the San Bemardino Associated Governments encourages its' member jurisdictions to take similar action to support ACA 4/Proposition 42. R02-008-DMK.DOC PROPOSED RESOLUTION Resolution No. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 42 TRAFFIC CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT WHEREAS, Prop. 42 will provide traffic congestion relief with no new taxes by allocating existing gasoline sales tax revenues estimated at approximately $1 billion annually for public transit, local road repair and improvements to local and state roads and highways; and WHEREAS, Prep. 42 is based on the principle that taxes paid at the gas pump should be used for transportation purposes and would dedicate those funds for transportation purposes, and WHEREAS, all projects will be subject to standard accounting practices to ensure they are delivered on time and on budget, and WHEREAS, traffic congestion is bad now and will get worse unless Prop. 42 is passed, jeopardizing California's economic recovery and costing Californians billions of dollars every year in wasted time, excess fuel and shipping delays; and WHEREAS, six thousand of our bridges and overpasses are structurally deficient or don't meet highway design standards, and planned improvements to our bus and rail commuter systems lay behind schedule; and WHEREAS, cities and counties lack funds to fix potholes and properly maintain local streets; and WHEREAS, traffic is paralyzing travel with Los Angeles now ranked the number one most congested urban area in the country, San Francisco/Oakland second, San Diego sixth and Sacramento, San Jose and, San Bernardino/Riverside following close behind; and WHEREAS, the state's legislative analyst's office recommended legislators come up with an additional, reliable and ongoing funding source to tackle California's ailing transportation system THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga SUPPORTS Proposition 42, the Traffic Congestion Improvement Act. .5/ Resolution No. 02- Page 2 of PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: __.day of ,2002. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the day of , 2002. Executed this day of ,2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk .5'2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 3, 2002 Mayor and Memb6rs of the City Council, Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager // % Diane Young, Records Coordinator Records Retention Schedules RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving records retention schedules for Purchasing, Engineering, RDA Finance, RCCF Finance and Fire Finance. Also included are amendments to two line items previously approved; one for the Library and one for Facilities Maintenance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: After a thorough review of the aforementioned departmental/divisional records retention schedules by the Records Coordinator and the affected department staff, several amendments are recommended for implementation. The amendments have been incorporated into the previous schedules, entered in the updated software program and printed in this new, easier-to-read format. Each department has approved its respective schedule, as submitted for your consideration, and the City Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved each one for legal compliance. The final step to legally validate the amended schedules is approval of the governing body. These schedules comprise the fourth group that will ultimately address ALL departments and divisions of the City. It is anticipated that the final group will be submitted for approval in March of this year. DMY RESOLUTION NO. 02-*** ~ ~ ¢ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULES FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS WHEREAS, it has been determined that the City records listed in the attached records retention schedules be retained for the designated periods of time based on their administrative, fiscal, legal and historical values; and WHEREAS, staff from the Department/Division responsible for each record series has reviewed and approved the recommended retention schedule for that Department/Division; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney's Office has determined that each records retention schedule is legally compliant; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the records retention schedules included in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof are approved. SECTION 2: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of January, 2002 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor Resolution No. 02-*** Page 2 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 3rd day of January, 2002. Executed this 4th day of January, 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk 5'5' EXHIBIT 'A' Records Retention Schedules for the following Departments Divisions Purchasing Engineering (Admin) Engineering (Traffic & Design) RDA Finance RCCF Finance Fire Finance & Misc. Amendments to: Library Facilities Maint. / Admin. City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:12/20/2001 TIME: 14:32:45 PURC~AS ING 4 153 Code Name Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record 1020.1 Dept'l General Correspondence original t Archive or Security Copy Class P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Purch Shred N 0 1020.2 Vendor Files 12050.7 4070.5 6010.1 Definition: General, chronological correspondence, not specific to any particular project or other specified record series. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) P 24 Active/Curren 0 24 N Purch Shred N 0 t Definition: Files containing information about, and correspondence with, vendors supplying products and/or services to the City. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Purch Recycle N O Teleco~m~uni~ations Devices Definition: Inventories and usage logs for City-issued cellular phones and pagers. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) WMBE Statistical Reports P 120 Current Year 0 120 N Purch Shred N 0 Definition: The City's copy of the report required to be filed with the State annually which states the level of participation by minority and women business enterprises in contracts, as specified in California Government Code Section 8790.75. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Bids - Unsuccessful P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Purch Shred N 0 Definition: The original, UNSUCCESSFUL bids for products and services. (Does not include bids for public works improvement projects, which are handled through Engineering.) (NOTE: The original bid submitted by the successful bidder is retained in the associated product/service file.) Page: City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name PURCHASING 4153 Record Title Code Name Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title NLunber DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:32:45 6010.2 6010.3 6010.4 6010.5 I RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Destruction Archive Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Purchase Requisitions P 24 Active/Curren 24 48 N Purch Shred N 0 t Definition: Original purchase requisitions submitted by City departments. (NOTE: If a purchase order is required to be issued, the requisition is then attached to, and retained with, the purchase order.) (NOTE: Do not destroy if litigation is pending.) Citation: CCE 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... " Request for Qualifications P 24 Active/Curren 24 48 N Purch Shred N 0 t Definition: Original responses to Requests for Qualifications. (NOTE: If an RFQ results in a contract or purchase order, it is attached to, and retained with the P.O. or contract file.) Citation: CCP 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... " P 24 Active/Curren 24 48 N Purch Shred N 0 t Purchase Orders Definition: Original purchase orders issued for products and services. Citation: CCP 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... " Purchasing Policy & Procedures P 24 Supersede 0 24 ¥ Purch Recycle N Definition: Document outlining the City's purchasing policies and procedures. Original or Copy Page: Securit~ Class City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number PURC~{ASiNG 4153 Code Name DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:32:45 Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Copy Class 6040.2 6060.1 Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Salvage & Surplus Property P 24 Current Year 24 48 N Purch Shred N 0 Definition: Records detailing the sale, or other disposition, of salvage and surplus property. Includes documentation of the California State Surplus Program. Citation: CCP 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... " Fixed Assets / Equipt. History P 24 Active/Curren 48 72 Y Purch Recycle N 0 Definition: Records detailing the history of equipment and fixed assets which the Purchasing Division is responsible for. (NOTE: The 6-year retention period begins when the equipment is no longer in service or is disposed of by the City.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Page: 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name ENGINEERING/ADMIN 4637 Code Name Record Title 10020.2 Easements Retention Schedule Sorted By.' Record Title Number DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:32:59 Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Copy Class 10020.5 10020.7 10020.8 10020.9 P 0 Recordation 0 0 Y Clerk Trf Y 0 Definition: Easements. Upon recordation, originals are transferred to the City Clerk to be scanned into the electronic document imaging system, then retained permanently in the City Clerk vault. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Liens & Releases P 0 Recordation 0 0 ¥ Clerk Trf N O Definition: Liens and subsequent releases placed on real property by the City. (Note: Upon recordation, ORIGINALS are transferred to the City Clerk's Office for retention in the City Clerk's vault.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) I~rovement Plans PLN 999 Peri,anent 0 999 Y Eng P Y O Definition: Original improvement plans for streets, parks, storm drains, flood channels, etc. (NOTE: These plans are "living'~ documents, subject to revision as needed, and never considered "completed" or "inactive". They are to be scanned into the City's electronic document imaging system for reference purposes. When revisions occur, they are to be rescanned and the superseded plan{s) will be deleted.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and'City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. {Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Subdivisions & Developments (DR'S) P 0 Active/Curren 24 24 Y Eng Scan/Recyc Y 0 t Definition: Original case files for Subdivisions, Developments, Development Reviews and Minor Development Reviews. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Tracts and Parcel Maps P 0 Active/Curren 24 24 Y Eng Scan/Recyc Y O Definition: Original case files for Tracts and Parcel Maps. Page: I City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name ENGINEERING/ADMIN 4637 Code Name Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title NLu~ber Record Title I RETENTION in months I Office Media Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Vital of Code Center Record Record Method Citation: GC 34090 DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:32:59 original t Archive or Security Copy Class 10021.1 10021.2 10021.4 1020.1 11101.8 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Hydrology Studies P 60 Active/Curren 60 120 Y Eng Scan/Recyc Y t Definition: Check Prints Definition: Original drainage studies (including hydrology maps) for individual projects, specific drainage areas or planned communities. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 0 Upon Approval 24 24 N Eng Recycle N 0 Working copies of plans (tracts, DR's, CUP's, etc.), prior to final set that is approved. reference purposes only. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) P 0 Recordation 0 0 Y Clerk Trf Maintained for Y 0 Lot Line Adjustments/Mergers Definition: Original documentation for lot line adjustments, transferred to the City Clerk's Office upon recordation, to be scanned into the electronic document imaging system, then retained permanently in the City Clerk's vault. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Oen'l Corresondence P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Eng Shred N O Definition: General, chronological correspondence, not specific to any particular project or other specified record series. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Street Vacations P 24 Upon Approval 0 24 N Eng Recycle N 0 Page: 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name ENGINEERING/ADMIN 4637 Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:32:59 I RETENTION in ~onths I Office Original Code Name Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Copy Definition: All records created and processed resulting in a Resolution authorizing a street vacation. (Does not include the Resolution.) (NOTE: The resolution is recorded and retained permanently in the City Clerk vault.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Stozm Drains & Flood Control P 24 Active/Curren 60 84 Y Eng Scan/Recyc Y 0 t Definition: Ail files, created in-house or by outside agencies, which document storm drain and flood control projects within the City's sphere of influence. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Flood Plain (FEMA) P 120 Supersede 0 120 Y Eng Scan/Recyc Y 0 Definition: Flood plain maps, amendments, and revisions provided & mandated by FEMA to be retained by the City, as the official repository. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Dept'l. Budget Working Papers P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Eng Recycle N 0 Definition: Includes correspondence and backup documents for departmental budget preparation. May also include DUPLICATE copies of requisitions, purchase orders, invoices, etc. used for reference purposes only. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Assessment Districts P 0 Upon Approval 0 0 N Spcl Dist Trf N 0 Definition: Records created during the creation of specific assessment districts, transferred to the Special Districts division upon City Council approval. 11700.8 11700.9 2050.2 4010.3 Page: 3 Security1 Class City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title 6020.1 8020.2 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title N~/~ber ENGINEERING/ADMIN 4637 DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:32:59 I RETENTION in months I Office Original Code Name Media Vital of Destruction Archive or Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record Copy Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Reimbursement Agreements P 24 Exp/Compl/Ter 96 120 Y Eng Shred N O Definition: (underground Utility Reimbursement Agreements, Drainage Reimbursement Agreements, Street Reimbursement Agreements) Includes: Reference copies of the actual agreements (Official, original agreements are filed in the City Clerk's vault) and a chronological history of each file's payments, correspondence, etc. Citation: CCP 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Permits (CUP's) P 24 Upon Approval 24 48 N Eng Scan/Recyc Y 0 The ORIGINAL case files for Conditional Use Permits. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and city Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) C~nditional Use Definition: Securit~ Class Page: 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title ENGR TRAFFIC/DESIGN 4639 Code Name Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number Media I RETENTION in months CodeI Active Event Record Code Center 10020.6 Property Condem%nations P 24 Final Court 24 Action Definition: Ail record~ related to condemned property. Citation: GC 34090 DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:34:38 I Office Original Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Total Method Record Record Copy Class 48 Y Eng Scan/Recyc Y O 1020.1 11100.4 11411.0 11610.2 11610.3 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Gen'l Correspondence P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Eng Shred N O Definition: General, in-coming and outgoing correspondence, filed chronologically, not specific to any particular project or other specified record series. citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Streets & Highways Master Plan P 24 Supersede 0 24 Y Eng Archive Y 0 Definition: Master plan of all City streets and highways. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Speed Zone Studies P 24 Supersede 0 24 N Eng Recycle N 0 Definition: Studies conducted to determine appropriate speed limits on City streets. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. {Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Street Maps P 24 Supersede 0 24 Y Eng Archive Y 0 Definition: ORIGINAL maps of the City streets/highways system. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for city Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Signal System Maps P 24 Supersede 0 24 Y Eng Recycle N O Page: 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name ENGR TRAFFIC/DESIGN 4639 Code Name Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Nu~nber DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:34:38 11620.1 2050.2 7030.7 7030.8 8020.4 Definition: Maps detailing the City's street signal systems. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Traffic Signal Maintenance P 36 Current Year 0 36 Y Eng Recycle N O Definition: Records detailing maintenance of the City's traffic signal system. (NOTE: May include a copy of the signal maintenance contract for reference purposes. The ORIGINAL contract is retained by the City Clerk's Office.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Dept. Budget Working Papers P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Eng Recycle N 0 Definition: Includes correspondence and backup documents for departmental budget preparation. May also include DUPLICATE copies of requisitions, purchase orders, invoices, etc. used for reference purposes only. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Traffic Investigation Reports P 0 D/R 0 0 N Police Shred N C Definition: Reference copies of traffic investigation reports. (TO be destroyed when no longer of use to the department.) Traffic Counts Definition: Evaluations of traffic volume at specified geographical locations within the City. citation:.GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Overload Permits P 24 Exp/Compl/Ter 0 24 N Eng Shred m Definition: Permits issued to move over-sized or OVer-weight loads upon the City's streets. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) N 0 Citation: GC 34090.7 Sets forth authorization for destruction of duplicate records. This includes recordings if the City keeps another record, such as written minutes, of the event which was recorded. P 36 Supersede 0 36 N Eng Recycle N Page: I RETENTION in months I Office Original t Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Archive or Security Code Center Record Record Copy Class city of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name ENGR TRAFFIC/DESIGN 4639 Code Name Record Title 8060.1 capital Improvement Projects Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Nunuber I RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record DATE:12/20/2001 TIME: 14:34:38 8060.2 Original 1 Archive or Security Copy Class P 24 Exp/Compl/Ter 60 84 Y Eng Scan/Recyc Y 0 m Definition: Project files for capital improvements including streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, etc. {May include copies of contracts for reference purposes. The ORIGINAL contracts are retained by the City Clerk's Office.) Citation: CCP 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... " Multi-year projections for Cap Imp P 24 Current Year 0 24 N Eng Recycle N 0 Definition: Background information for preparing projections of capital improvement projects needed over multiple year periods, used for Measure I grant funding purposes. (NOTE: the projections are approved annually by means of a City Council resolution, which becomes a permanent document.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number 5015 Code Name Media Code Record Title Active RETENTION in months Event Record Code Center P 24 Current Year 60 Definition: Accounts payable files. (For RDA only) Citation: GC 34090 DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:35:07 I Office Original t Vital of Destruction Total Record Record Method Archive or Security Copy Class 84 N Finance Shred N 0 4010.2 4011.4 4012.8 4012.9 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) RDA - Accounts Receivable P 24 Current Year 60 84 N Finance Shred N 0 Definition: Accounts Receivable files. (For RDA only) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.} RDA - General Ledger & Postings P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Finance Scan/Rec¥c Y O Definition: Reports including all journal entries and encumbrance reports for a specified period (ie: Fiscal Year). Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) RDA - Journal Vouchers P 24 Current Year 84 108 N Finance Shred N 0 Definition: Supporting documentation of journal vouchers, which are posted in the G/L. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. {Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) RDA - Budget Transfers P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Finance Recycle N 0 Page: City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE 5015 Code Name I RETENTION in months I Office Media Vital of Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Method Code Center Record Record DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:35:08 Original Archive or Security Copy Class 4013.1 4013.3 4030.2 Definition: Transfers of budgeted amounts between divisions/objects and Redevelopment Agency Board appropriation increases. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) RDA - Fixed Assets P 24 Active/Curren 48 72 N Finance Recycle N 0 t Definition: Records documenting RDA's fixed assets including furniture, equipment and vehicles. (NOTE: The retention period begins when the equipment is no longer in service or is disposed of by RDA.) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) RDA - 1099's P 24 Current Year 120 144 N Finance Shred Definition: Individuals' and commercial vendors' special tax forms. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve ~estruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) RDA - Sank Stmts & Reconciliations P 24 Audit 36 60 N Finance Shred Definition: N N Statements and reports received from banks which the RDA has accounts with, used to reconcile the RDA books. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE Record Title Code Name 4030.6 RDA - Cancelled Checks 4050.3 4080.1 4080.4 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Nunzber DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:35:08 5015 Code Active Event Record Total Vital of Destruction Code Center Record Record Method P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Finance Shred Original t Archive or Security Copy Class N 0 Definition: Cancelled checks returned by the banks for purposes of reconciling the accounts payables. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation:. CCP 337 et seq. Sets forth the statute of limitations at 4 years for most contracts and 10 years for filing legal action relative to contracts where the contractor "performs or furnishes the design, specifications, surveying, planning, supervision, testing, or observation of construction or construction of an improvement to real property .... " citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) RDA - Bond Statement Files P 12 Exp/Compl/Ter 108 120 N Finance Recycle N O m Definition: Bank statements on active RDA bond issues. {NOTE: Retain all statements for the life of the bond - per the Finance Officer). Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.} RDA - Cash Flow Investment Records P 24 Active/Curren 96 120 N 4140 Shred N 0 t Definition: Records detailing investments at specific financial institutions and Bank of America general correspondence. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) RDA - Invest. Portfolio Mgmt. P 24 Current Year 36 60 N 4140 Shred N O Page: 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number REDEVELOPMENT FINANCE 5015 Code Name I RETENTION in months I Office Media Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Vital of Code Center Record Record Method DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:35:08 Original t Archive or Security Copy Class Definition: Cash/Investment portfolio assets reports. Includes investment market pricing and valuation backup documents. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Na~ne IRecord Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number FIRE FINA/qCE 5027 Code Name Media I RETENTION in months I Office Code Active Event Record of Total Vital Destruction Code Center Record Record Method 4010.1 4010.2 4011.4 4012.8 DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:35:23 Original Archive or Security Copy Class Fire - Accounts Payable P 24 Current Year 60 84 N Finance Shred N 0 Definition: Accounts payable files. (Fire only) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. {Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - Accounts Recelvable P 24 Current Year 60 84 Y Finance Shred N O Definition: Accounts Receivable files. (Fire only) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - General ~edger & Postings P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Finance Scan Y O Definition: Reports including all journal entries and encumbrance reports for a specified period (ie: Fiscal Year). Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - Journal Vouchers P 24 Current Year 84 108 N Finance Shred N 0 Definition: Supporting documentation of journal vouchers, which are posted in the G/L. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and city Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name IRecord Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:35:23 FIRE FINA_~CE 5027 Code Name Code Active Event Record Total Vital of Destruction Code Center Record Record Method Original t Archive or Security Copy Class 4013.1 4013.3 4030.2 4030.6 Fire - Fixed Assets P 24 Active/Curren 48 72 Y Finance Recycle N 0 t Definition: Records documenting the Fire District's fixed assets including furniture, equipment and vehicles. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.} Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - 1099 Forms P 24 Current Year 120 144 N Finance Shred N O Definition: Individuals' and commercial vendors' special tax forms. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - Bank Reconciliations P 24 Audit 36 60 N Finance Shred N O Definition: Statements and reports received from banks which the Fire District has accounts with, used to reconcile the Fire District books. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and city Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - Cancelled Checks P 24 Current Year 36 60 Y Finance Shred N 0 Definition: Cancelled checks returned by the banks for purposes of reconciling the accounts payables. (Fire District only) Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. {Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) F age: 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name FIRE FINANCE lRecord Title Code Name 5027 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number Citation: A/D DATE:12/20/2001 TiME:14:35:24 I RETENTION in months I Office Original Media Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Vital of Archive or Security Code Center Record Record Method Copy Class 4040.0 4040.9 4041.2 NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - Payroll Records P 24 Current Year 36 60 Y Finance Shred Definition: Payroll registers, which detail payroll paid for a specific pay period. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - Time Sheets P 24 Current Year 36 60 N Finance Shred N Definition: Records documenting each employee's hours worked, including time other than straight time. Citation: 29 CFR 516.6 (a) Supplementary basic records: Each employer required to maintain records under this part shall preserve for a period of at least 2 years. {1) Basic employment and earnings records. From the date of last entry, all basic time and earning cards or sheets... {et seq) (2) Wage rate tables. From their last effective date, all tables or schedules of the employer which provide the piece rates or other rates used in computing straight-time earnings, wages, or salary, or overtime pay computation ...... (c} Records of additions to or deductions from wages paid: (1) Those records relating to individual employees referred to in Sec. 516.2 {a) (1) ... et seq. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - Vacation & Sick Leave P 24 Current Year 24 48 Y Finance Shred N Definition: N 0 0 Records documenting each employee's accrued and used vacation and sick leave. (NOTE: Records must be retained if exposure to toxic substances is in question. Refer to Risk Management division.) Citation: 29 CFR 516.6 (a) Supplementary basic records: Each employer required to maintain records under this part shall preserve for a period of at least 2 years. {1) Basic employment and earnings records. From the date of last entry, all basic time and earning cards or sheets... (et seq) (2) Wage rate tables. From their last effective date, all tables or schedules of the employer which provide the piece rates or other rates used in computing straight-time earnings, wages, or salary, or overtime pay computation ...... (c) Records of additions to or deductions from wages paid: (1) Those records relating to individual employees referred to in Sec. 516.2 (a) (1) ... et seq. Page: 3 City of Rancho Cuca-monga Unknown Department Name FIRE FINANCE Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Nu~uber DATE:12/20/2001 TI~4E:14:35:24 5027 Code Name Media ~ RETENTION in months I Office Original Total Vital Destruction Code Center Record Record Method Copy Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - State & Fed'l Qtrly Reports P 24 Audit 36 60 N Finance Shred N O Definition: Fire District's copies of the original payroll reports generated quarterly and forwarded to the State and Federal gev'ts, as required. Citation: 29 USC 436 Every person required to file any report under this subchapter shall maintain records on the matters required to be reported which will provide in sufficient detail the necessary basic information and data .... available for examination for a period of not less than five years after the filing of the documents based on the information which they contain. Citation: GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Fire - W-2's F 12 Current Year 108 120 Y Finance Shred N 0 Definition: Fire District's copies of original W-2's distributed to employees in january for the previous calendar year's earnings. Citation: 26 CFR 31.6001-1 (a) (2) Except as otherwise provided.., every person required by the re~ulations in this part to keep records in respect of a tax.., shall maintain such records for at least four years after the due date of such tax for the return period to which the records relate, or the date such tax is paid, whichever is later. Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Securit5t Class 4041.3 4041.4 4050.3 Fire - Bond Statement Files P 12 Exp/Compl/Ter m Definition: Bank statements on active Fire District bond issues. per the Finance Officer.) 108 120 N Finance Recycle Y 0 (NOTE: Retain all statements for the life of the bond - Page: 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title FIRE FINANCE 5027 Code Name Citation: GC 34090 Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:35:24 4070.4 Fire - P.E.R.S. Definition: I RETENTION in months I Office Media Destruction Code Active Event Record Total Vital of Code Center Record Record Method Original Archive or Security Copy Class Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Reports P 24 Current Year 456 480 Y Finance Shred N Reports documenting Fire District and employee contributions to P.E.R.S. Citation: 29 CFR 1627.3 (b) (2) (b) (2) Every employer shall keep on file any employee benefit plans such as pension and insurance plans, as well as copies of any seniority systems and merit systems which are in writing, for the full period the plan or system is in effect, and for at least 1 year after its termination.., et seq. Citation: A/D No legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) City of Rancho Cucamonga Unknown Department Name Record Title Retention Schedule Sorted By: Record Title Number R.C.C.F. FINANCE 5035 Code Name Media I RETENTION in months CodeI Active Event Record Code Center 4013.2 R.C.C.F. Accounting Records DATE:12/20/2001 TIME:14:35:44 I office Original Total Vital of Destruction Archive or Security Record Record Method Copy Class P 24 Current Year 96 120 Y Finance Shred N 0 Definition: Deposit records, payment records (checks and invoices), tax returns, monthly Treasurer's Report, bank statements, cancelled checks. Citatlon:,GC 34090 Sets forth authorization for City Council and City Attorney to approve destruction of city records other than those listed as exceptions. (Refer to text of GC 34090 for exceptions.) Citation: A/D NO legal statute applicable, OR staff opts to retain records longer than the minimum established by statute. (Length of retention based on administrative value of the records.) Page: 1 Miscellaneous Amendments Library- Dept. #4533 Record Series #5030.0 - Library Board Agendas Change retention from: 48 months without scanning To: Scan, hold hard copies for 12 months Facilities Maint / Yard - Dept. #4245 Record Series #14041.1 - Vehicle Operators Daily Checklist Change definition from: "Daily log for each Public Works vehicle detailing purpose, location and mileage." To: "Daily record for each Public Works vehicle detailing driver, vehicle condition, mileage and hours driven." Change retention from 36 months to 24 months. F? THE C I T Y OF ~AN CH 0 C U CAFI 0 N GA SlaffReport DATE: TO: January 2, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Brad Buller, City Planner Ruben Warren, Technician HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00688 -- DANIEL AND GINA SHACKELFORD - An application to designate the Dorothy Finley House and property as a Historic Landmark, located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive - APN: 207-081-24. MILLS ACT AGREEMENT DRC2001-00727 - DANIEL AND GINA SHACKELFORD - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Dorothy Finley House, a Historic Landmark, located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive - APN: 207-081-24. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Historic Property Preservation Agreement as unanimously recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission and staff and designate the Dorothy Finley House as a Historical Landmark. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The land and home located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive in the Red Hill area is historically significant for several reasons. First, it is architecturally unique. Second, situated among other potentially historic properties, its location in the Red Hill neighborhood is distinct. Finally, its former owners were prominent residents of the local community. Built by Roy E. Dowd and Son in 1944, the Spanish Eclectic home was sold one year later to the proprietors of the Finley Pharmacies in the area, Gene and Dorothy Finley. Walter and Rehnae Talleur acquired the residence in 1975. As Ms. Talleur later remarried, her second husband, John Carroll, is believed to have owned several Goodyear Tire Centers in the area. In September 2001, Mrs. Rehnae Carroll sold the residence to Daniel and Gina Shackelford. A cross-gabled mission tile roof, multiple textures, patterned Moorish tiles, decorative iron railings and a two-story early-stack stone tower provide an eclectic facade. In the rear elevation, glass block common in the 1940s, and rarely used in Spanish homes, and a one- story tower are the focal point. Extensive gardens and mature trees are also present. Staff CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2001-00688 - SHACKELFORD MILLS ACT AGREEMENT DRC2001-00727 - SHACKELFORD January 2, 2001 Page 2 inspection of the property and original plans reveal no obvious exterior modifications have followed construction. The concept of the Mills Act program is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance. This intent is encouraged through the reduction of property taxes, thus enabling the property owner to reinvest the money saved from the reduced property tax on improvements. The properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. Staff estimates the property tax savings to the owner could be as much as $785.00 and the reduction in tax proceeds to the City would be $95.00. The exact amounts are dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income potential and capitalization rate at the of assessment. Brad Buller City Planner BB: RW\ls Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report Dated December 12, 2001 Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Resolution of Approval -2- RESOLUTION NO. O~'-t~ ~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2001-00688, DESIGNATING THE DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 7920 VALLE VISTA DRIVE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207~081-24 A. Recitals. 1. Daniel and Gina Shackelford filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 12, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed, public hearing. 3. On January 2, 2002, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered said application. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately .52 acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council on January 2, 2001, including written and oral staff reports, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Si.qnificance Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact/s: Large estate residences such as the Dorothy Finley home are representative of the original development of the Red Hill area. Findinq 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building, which was once common but is now rare. Fact/s: The property identifies a historic period of the 1920s, '30s, and '40s, when homes of the Spanish Style became popular in California, Arizona, Texas, and Florida following the Panama-California Exposition held in San Diego in 1915. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00688-SHACKELFORD January 2,2002 Page 2 Findinq 3: The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. FactJs: The landmark eligible property is approximately 60 years old. Finding 4: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Fact/s: The property was owned by the Finley's, prominent citizens of the community and proprietors of Finley Pharmacies. Historic Architectural and Enqineerinq Siqnificance: Findinq 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed Landmark are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. FacEs: The Spanish Eclectic details, such as patterned tile, stone, roofing materials, and multiple surface textures, including wood brackets is unique. Other period materials include, glass block, and plate glass. Findinq 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. FactJs: The round tower and collection of building materials are both beautiful and unusual. c. Neiqhborhood and Geoqraphic Settinq: Findinq 1: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. FacFs: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety of architectural trends throughout the Red Hill area and historical continuity of the neighborhood. FindinR 2: The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. FacFs: The wide frontage of the home and prominence enhances the character of the neighborhood. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as landmark designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 2nd day of January, 2002, the Landmark Application. 6. The Mayor of this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. T H E CITY OF i~ANCHO CIICAHONGA Staff Report DATE: December 12, 2001 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Ruben Warren, Planning Technician SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2001-00688 - DANIEL AND GINA SHACKELFORD - An application to designate the Dorothy Finley House and property as a Historic Landmark, located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive - APN: 207-081-24. Related file: Mills Act Agreement DRC2001-00727. MILLS ACT AGREEMENT DRC2001-00727 - DANIEL AND GINA SHACKELFORD - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax on the Dorothy Finley House, a Histodc Landmark located at 7920 Valle Vista Drive - APN: 207-081-24. Related file: Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688. BACKGROUND: Historical Significance: The land and home located at 7920 Valle Vista Ddve in the Red Hill area is historically significant for several reasons. First and foremost, it is architecturally unique. Second, situated among other potentially historic properties, it is an established element of the Red Hill neighborhood. Finally, its former owners were prominent residents of the local community. Built by Roy E. Dowd and Son in 1944, the Spanish Eclectic home was sold 1-year later to Gene and Dorothy Finley. The FinJey's were the proprietors of the Finley Pharmacies in the area. A Finley Pharmacy is present today in the City of Fontana on Sierra Avenue. Waiter and RehnaeTalleur acquired the residence in 1975 from Mrs. Finley. Ms. Talleur later remarried. Her second husband, John Carroll, is believed to have owned several Goodyear Tire Centers in the area. In September 2001, Mrs. Rehnae Carroll sold the residepce tu Daniel and Gina Shackelford. Site Characteristics: Composed of 2 original lots, the site is one of the larger parcels in the tract. Much of the original setting is retained, as multiple homes of the same period compose the streetscape. The site is zoned Low Density Residential (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre). ITEMS A & B HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00688 AND MILLS ACT AGREEMENT DRC2001-00727 DANIEL AND GINA SHACKELFORD - DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE December 12, 2001 Page 2 ANALYSIS: General: The home sits on 2 lots totaling .52 acre. It features 3 bedrooms and 2¼ baths, and is 3,000 square feet. Extensive gardens and mature trees are also present. The integrity of the home is intact. Staff inspection of the site and original plans reveals, with the exception of wallpaper and interior paint that no alterations have been made to the home. Exterior Architecture: A cross-gabled mission tile roof tops the main building. Two textures including 8-inch block on the first story and a smooth-stucco finish on the second story provide an eclectic collection of details. The front door is outlined with patterned Moorish tiles, and also has a balcony that sits above it. Two projecting decorative iron railings enhance the facade. Exposed decorative brackets support the second-story cantilever. A two-story early-stack stone tower is the focal point of the facade. In the rear elevation of the home, glass block common in the 1940s, and rarely used in Spanish homes, as well as plate glass windows provide detail. A deck encased by a tile splay sits over the garage, but is not noticeable from the street. A cement grill on the south and rear elevation of the garage provides ventilation. A 1-car porte-cochere separates the home from the garage. A full-size basement provides a laundry room and storage space. Intedor Details: Preserved Moorish-influenced patterned and clay tiles flank the entrance hall and circular staircase recessed in the two-story tower. Wood floors fit the other rooms of the house. A perceived period gold-colored chandelier graces the formal dining room. Heavy wood carved beams embrace the open ceiling of the upstairs great room. An elaborate Mermaid-mosaic provides contrast to the simple rows of tile laid on the bathroom walls, ceiling, and floor. The walls and ceiling of the kitchen are also tile- covered. Landmark Desiqnation.' The subject site and structure qualify for landmark designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical, architectural, and neighborhood setting. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the Facts for Finding section. The requested designation area includes the subject lot, residence, original perimeter walls with mission tile, and stone cap. Later additions on the south end of the property, which include a sports court, swimming pool, pool house, and patio, are exempt from the designation. Mills Act Agreement In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act Agreement. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed and is attached for reference. The concept of the Mills Act program is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance. This intent is encouraged through the reduction of property taxes, thus enabling the properly owner to reinvest the money saved from the reduced property tax on improvements. The properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00688 AND MILLS ACT AGREEMENT DRC2001-00727 DANIEL AND GINA SHACKELFORD - DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE December 12, 2001 Page 3 staff on an annual basis to determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. At the meeting, staff will provide the approximate property tax savings to the owner and the reduction in tax proceeds to the City. The exact amounts are dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income potential and capitalization rate at the time of the assessment. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Article 19, Section 15301 Class 1 .d of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. FACTS FOR FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical pedod, type, style, region, or way of life. FacEs: Large estate residences, such as the Dorothy Finley home are representative of the original development of the Red Hill area. Findinq 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which was once common but is now rare. FacEs: The property identifies a histodc pedod of the 1920s, 30s, and 40s, when homes of Spanish prototypes became popular in California, Arizona, Texas, and Flodda following the Panama-California Exposition held in San Diego in 1915. Finding 3: The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. FacEs: The landmark eligible property is approximately 60 years old. Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important, or a local personality. FacEs: The property was owned by the Finley's, prominent citizens of the community and proprietors of Finley Pharmacies. B. Histodc Architectural and Enqineednq Siqnificance: Findinq 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective. FacEs: The Spanish eclectic details, such as patterned tile, stone, roofing material, and multiple surfaces, including wood brackets is unique. Other materials used from the period, which include glass block and plate glass, are unique to the period of construction. ?¢ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00688 AND MILLS ACT AGREEMENT DRC2001-00727 DANIEL AND GINA SHACKELFORD - DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE December 12, 2001 Page 4 Findinq 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful and/or unusual. Fact/s: The round tower and collection of materials are unusual. C. Neighborhood and Geoqraphic Settinq: Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. Fact/s: The proposed landmark contributes to the variety of architectural trends throughout the Red Hill area and historical continuity of the neighborhood. Findinq 2: The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. Fact/s: The wide frontage of the home and prominence has enhanced the enhanced the character of the neighborhood since its construction. CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Landmark designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission adopt the attached Resolution for Historic Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688, and recommend approval, by minute action, the Landmark Designation and Mills Act Agreement, and to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Respecffullysubmi~ed, Brad Buller, City Planner BB:RW/jc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Photographs of Residence Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Original Plans of the Residence Exhibit "D" - Agreement Schedule, List of Improvements Resolution of Approval for Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688 SUR ,~ z~/r2CALLE 9/ City of Rancho Cucamonga Ci1YoF Historic Preservation Commission ~It~Ct4OcocAt~ OCT £ ~ 2001 MILLS ACT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL: (To be completed by the Applicant) ff~C£~o ' PLA31NING Potential Structure / Properly Improvement Time - Line Please list the improvements which are intended to take place over the next 10 years. List them in order of owner's priority. IMPROVEMENT OWNER CERTIFICATION '. ; : ': : · ' :' ' ..... '. .. · · I certify that I am presently the legal owner of{ntm~j~ct prope//]tyjt Further, I acknowledge the supplemental information~n this form will be yed as a~ exhi~t/~ttached to the Mills Act Agreement. Date: /O"a~ O~ Signature: /~-"f-'---~_..~'-/--4.~t~'~.. · . RESOLUTION NO. 01-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2001-00688 TO DESIGNATE THE DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE AS A LANDMARK AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-081-24. A. Recitals. 1. Daniel and Gina Shackelford filed an application for Landmark Designation described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." 2. On December 12, 2001, the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, it is here by found, determined, and resolved by the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct 2. The application applies to all structures, hedtage eligible trees, and the approximately .52 acre of land, a rectangle configuration located at 7920 Valle Vista Ddve. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on December 12, 2001, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Si.qnificance: FindinR 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical pedod, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact/s: Large estate residences, such as the Dorothy Finley home are representative of the odginal development of the Red Hill area. Findin.q 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building, which was once common but is now rare. Fact/s: The property identifies a historic period of the 1920s, '30s, and '40s, when homes of Spanish prototypes became popular in California, Arizona, Texas, and Florida following the Panama- California Exposition held in San Diego in 1915. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO. 01-04 DRC2001-00688 - DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE December 12, 2001 Page 2 Findinq 3: The proposed landmark is o¢ greater age than most of its kind. Fact/s: The landmark eligible property is approximately 60 years old. Finding 4: The proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned or important, or a local personality. Fact/s: The property was owned by the Finleys, who were prominent citizens of the community and proprietors of Finley Pharmacies. b. Histodc Architectural and En.qineedn.q Significance: Finding 1: The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual, significant, or uniquely effective. Fact/s: The Spanish eclectic details, such as pattemed tile, stone, roofing material, and multiple surfaces including wood brackets are unique. Other materials used from the pedod, which include glass block and plate glass, are unique to the period of construction. FindinR 2: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful, or its details and materials are beautiful and/or unusual. Fact/s: The round tower and collection of materials are unusual. c. NeiRhborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding 1: The proposed landmark materially benefits the histodc character of the neighborhood. FacFs: The proposed landmark contributes to the vadety of architectural trends throughout the Red Hill area and historical continuity of the neighborhood. Finding 2: The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. Fact/s: The wide frontage of the home and prominence has enhanced the character of the neighborhood since its construction. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality ACt of 1970, as landmark designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO. 01-04 DRC2001-00688 - DOROTHY FINLEY HOUSE December 12, 2001 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission here by resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation DRC2001-00688, on the 12th day of December 2001. 6. Conditions of stated Resolution include Commission or their designee approval for any extedor alteration or addition to subject property other than in-kind improvements. 7. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2001. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. BY: Larry T. McNeil, Chairman A'CI'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Histodc Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Histodc Preservation Commission'held on the 12th day of December 2001, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: CALLE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ]~ N G I ~E E 1~I NG D E PAI~ T~ E N T DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND RELEASE OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT RELEASING PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 15268 FOR DR 00-24, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ELM AVENUE AND WHITE BIRCH DRIVE, SUBMI'I-FED BY DARRELL D. CLENDENEN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement, securities and releasing the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and release. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 00-24, located at the northeast corner of Elm Avenue and White Bimh Drive, in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and General Industrial (Subarea 8) Districts of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the City Planner on September 19, 2000, for one tilt-up industrial building. The Developer, Darrel D. Clendenen, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $13,700.00 $ 6,850.00 A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by City Council on September 16, 1982, and recorded on September 22, 1982, as Document No. 82-190017 in the office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 00-24 Janua~ 2,2002 Page 2 The agreement was for specific parcels to pay one-half the cost of installation of a landscape median island on Foothill Boulevard. The Developer has paid the sum of $2,384.82 for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 15268 for its share of the contribution in-lieu of construction for the said median island. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:WV:sc Attachments ~ITY OF rrF~ .~ ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA TI'I~.~:.. ¥~:~,~r¥ m~p _ ~N O INEERIHG DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. d 2 -- ~d~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DR 00-24 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on January 2, 2002, by Darrell D. Clendenen as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast comer of Elm Avenue and White Birch Drive; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DR 00-24; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved, and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. /o/ RESOLUTION NO. ~2 - ~) 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DARRELL D. CLENDENEN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 82- 163 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Messenger Investment Corporation; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bemardino County, California, on September 22, 1982, as Document No. 82-190017; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 15268 and that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. C H O C U C A M,O N G A ~ N Gl NI~I~DI N C,. DI~D^DTMI~N~ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND RELEASE OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT RELEASING PARCELS 2 AND 3 OF PARCEL MAP 15268 FOR DR 00-25, LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF WHITE BIRCH DRIVE, EAST OF ELM AVENUE, SUBMI'I-I-ED BY STEFAN A. SMITH RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement, securities and releasing the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and release. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 00-25, located at the north side of White Birch Drive, east of Elm Avenue, in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and General Industrial (Subarea 8) Districts of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the City Planner on September 19, 2000, for two tilt-up industrial buildings. The Developer, Stefan A. Smith, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $12,200.00 $ 6,100.00 A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by City Council on September 16, 1982, and recorded on September 22, 1982, as Document No. 82-190017 in the office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 00-25 Janua~ 2,2002 Page 2 The agreement was for specific parcels to pay one-half the cost of installation of a landscape median island on Foothill Boulevard. The Developer has paid the sum of $2,655.53 for Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 15268 for its share of the contribution in- lieu of construction for the said median island. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:WV:sc Attachments ~ITY OF :rANCHO CUCAMONGA ~NGINE~..RING DIVISION E~[[llT: N VICINITY MI:tP _ RESOLUTION NO. Oa~, -~08 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DR 00-25 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on January 2, 2002, by Stefun A. Smith as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the north side of White Birch Drive, east of Elm Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DR 00-25; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved, and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. RESOLUTION NO. 02 -~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM STEFAN A. SMITH WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 82-163 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Messenger Investment Corporation; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvem6nt Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bemardino County, California, on September 22, 1982, as Document No. 82-190017; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map 15268, and that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. /07 RANCHO C U C A M O N GA DI~DAI~THI~N T Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15529 AND ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR STREET PURPOSES ON PILGRIMS COURT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERN TERMINUS OF PILGRIMS COURT, SOUTH OF 19TM STREET, SUBMI'I-rED BY FRED A. NELSON JR. AND UP, Al S. NELSON RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 15529, accepting the Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monument Cash Deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Pamel Map 15529, located at the southern terminus of Pilgrims court, south of 19th Street, in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission on November 21, 2000, for the division of 0.65 acres into two pamels. The Developers, Fred A. Nelson Jr. and Urai S. Nelson, are submitting an improvement agreement and improvement securities to guarantee the installation of public street improvements in the following amounts: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PM 15529 January 2, 2002 Page 2 Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Deposit: $5,800.00 $2,900.00 $2,500.00 The Developer has requested the City accept the dedication at the southern terminus of Pilgrims Court as offered on an easement deed recorded in the County of San Bernardino on August 15, 1988, in order to construct the final portion of the street. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'~eil City Engineer WJO:VVV:sc Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINE. ERING DIVISION N RESOLUTION NO. 02. --~)/~) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 15529, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15529, submitted by Fred A. Nelson Jr. and Urai S. Nelson, and consisting of a subdivision of 0.65 acres of land into two parcels, located at the southern terminus of Pilgrims Court, south of 19th Street, in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 21, 2000; and WHEREAS, Pamel Map No. 15529 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities by Fred A. Nelson Jr. and Urai S. Nelson, as developers. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities submitted by said developers be and the same are hereby approved; and that said Parcel Map No. 15529 be and the same is hereby approved and the City engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 111 RESOLUTION NO. ~,Z - ~)// A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION ON PILGRIMS COURT AS OFFERED FOR STREET AND RELATED PURPOSES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1: The offer to dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, the property herein described for street and related purposes, is hereby accepted. Said property is described as follows: Those portions of the easement per easement deed as recorded Document No. 88-266775, Official Records of San Bemardino County, on August 15, 1988. Said property is further described as follows: Being a portion of the South 100.00 feet of the West ~ of the East ~ of Lot 1, Block 12, Cucamonga Homestead Association as per plat recorded in Book 8, Page 46 of Maps, records of said County, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southerly terminus of the Westerly line of Pilgrims Court, said point being on the North line of said South 100.00 feet of the West ~ of the East % of Lot 1, a radial to said point bearing North 52° 48' 56" East as shown on Tract 12577 per plat recorded in Book 199, Page(s) 70 and 71, records of said County; thence Southeasterly through a curve, concave Northerly having a radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 106° 14' 54" a distance of 92.72 feet to the intersection of the Easterly line of said Pilgrims Court with said North line, a radial to said point being North 53° 27' 58" West as shown on said Tract 12577; thence South 89° 39' 29" West a distance of 80.00 feet along said North line to the point of beginning. Section 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino, State of California. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 15529 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Distdct No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting ACt of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the dght of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and //$ RESOLUTION NO. PM 15529 January 2, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. il'/ Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: FRED A. NELSON JR. & URAI S. NELSON The legal description of the Property is: The South 100 feet of the West one-half of the East one-half of Lot I in Block 12 of Cucamonga Homestead Association Land, in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, as per map re'corded in Book 6, page(s) 46, of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Except the following described parcel of land: Beginning at the Southeast comer of the West one-half of said Lot 1; thence along the South line of said Lot 1; North 89° 40' 1 $" East 44.53 feet; thence North 10° 52' 18" West 31.79 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southeast and having a radius of 500.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 08° 08' 55", an arc distance of 71.11 feet; thence South 89° 40' 15" West 21.07 feet to the East line of the West one-half of said Lot 1; thence along said line South 00° 29' 28" East 100.00 feet to the Point of Begiuning. Said legal description is pursuant to that certain Certificate of Compliance No. 396 for Lot Line Adjustment which recorded May 25, 2000 as Instrument No. 2000-187724, Official Records. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. //5 £XtlI~IT ~¢ -~ " . ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ' LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 CLMD #1) represents 33.93 acres of landscape area and 43.25 acres of parks that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and Parks. The 43.25 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park, 6.5 acres of Church Street Park, the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center which consists of 175 acres and the newest park, Golden Oaks Park located on 6t~ Street, west of Archibald. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1 ) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maimenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Exhibit B (continued) Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: PARCEL MAP 15529 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5500L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 --- SLD # 2 1 Landscaping Community Trail DGSF Turf SF Non-Turf SF Tl'~es L1 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 S 2 L 1 2 2 2 2 //'9 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2000/2001 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): Land Use Type # of # of Rate Per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 7269 1.0 7269 $92.21 $670.274.49 Family Multi- Unit 5952 0.5 2976 $92.21 $274,416.96 Family TOTAL $944,691.45 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15529) is: 2 dwelling units x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $184.42 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. I (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I.and 1 Isle [ Init Type I Inits I/nit~ Factor ! lnlt~ l Init Revenue Single Pamel 16,956.00 1.00 16,956.00 $17.77 $301,310.00 Family Multi- Unit 6,257.00 1.00 6,257.00 $17.77 $111,190.00 Family Commercial Acre 1,999.52 2.00 3,999.04 $17.77 $71,060:00 TOTAL $483,560.00 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15529) is: 2 Dwelling Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $35.54 Annual Assessment c-1 Exhibit C (continued) STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2000/01. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit T.vpe Ilnit~ Units Factor IJnit~ Unit Revenue Single Parcel 6606 1.00 6606 $39.97 $264,042.00 Family The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 15529) is: 2 Dwelling Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $79.94 Annual Assessment c-2 /2 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT, DISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY ADJACENT TO GARClA DRIVE AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT, NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16181, AND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND GARClA DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY SRG/CAMREAL, BBC., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 16181 and the disposition of City-owned property adjacent to Garcia Drive, accepting the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map 16181, located at the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Garcia Drive, in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay District, and Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 11, 2001, for the division of 20 acres into one lot. This project is for the development of 272 apar-[ments.. The Developer, SRG/CAMREAL, L.L.C. a Delaware Limited Liability Company, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: /2.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16181 January 2, 2002 Page 2 Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: Monumentation Cash Bond: $116,000.00 $ 58,000.00 $ 2,450.00 On of the conditions of approval of this tract directs the City to process and quitclaim Lot "A" of Tract 15711-2 adjacent to Garcia Drive. On October 24, 2001, the Planning Commission determined that the said proposed quitclaim would conform to the General Plan. Through these proceedings, the Developer will obtain Lot "A" of Tract 15711-2 and use the land as part of Tract 16181. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer W JO:WV:sc Attachments I22. BASELINE ROUTE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E~~G DXVE.~0N ~z3 RESOLUTION NO. 0~, '" ~)/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16181, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 16181, submitted by SRB/CAMREAL, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and consisting of 272 apartments on 20 acres of land, located at the southeast comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Garcia Drive, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on April 11, 2001, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16181 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Securities by SRB/CAMREAL, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Securities submitted by said Developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication and the fmal map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16181 is hereby approved, and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. ~ 2"' O/Z/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED HEREIN A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a fee interest in that certain parcel of real property generally located at the easterly end of Santa Clara Court in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, California, and hereinafter referred to in this Resolution as "said property." A full, true and complete description of said property is set forth in that copy of deed attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference set forth herein. (ii) California Government Code Section 37350 provides as follows: "A City may purchase, lease, receive, hold, and enjoy real and personal property, and control and dispose of it for the common benefit." (iii) California Government Code Section 37351 provides in pertinent part, as follows: The legislative body (City Council) may.., dispose of, and convey such property for the benefit of the City ..... " (iv) The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the findings on October 24, 2001, that disposing of said property, as herein contemplated, would be in conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (v) Said property was acquired by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in fee, for future land use the need for which has been superseded by the development of Tract No. 16181. (vi) Said property constitutes a burden on the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is no longer necessary or convenient for the purposes for which it was acquired. (vii) Conveyance of said property will further the use of said property and benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga by deletion of a necessity to maintain said property. RESOLUTION NO. TR 16181 January 2, 2002 Page 2 (viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. All facts stated the Recitals, Part A., of this Resolution hereby are found to be true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds that the quitclaiming of said property to the persons described in said deed will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. The Mayor and City Clerk hereby are authorized and directed to execute the deed, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and cause the same to be recorded forthwith upon adoption of this Resolution. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Assessor Parcel No.: 1100-14~-84 RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Rancho Cucamonga WHEN RECORDED MAlL TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SPACE ABOVE THIS LrNE FOR RECORDER'S USE Street Address: City & State: MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED -- OR COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE LESS LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING AT ]IME OF SALE. Signature of Declarant or Agent determining tm{. Firm Name CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of California, hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to SR¥CAMREAL,L.L.C., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY that certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, described and shown on the attached Exhibits "A" and "B". STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared William J. O'Neil, City Engineer FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signalure{s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature. lZ7 EXHIBIT A Legal Description Being Lot A, Tract 15711-2, per plat recorded in Book 279, pages 1 through 5 of Maps, records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. See Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part thereof. Prepared by: Dan Guerra & Associates 8331 Utica Avenue, Suite 150 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (909) 987-4306 Date TRACT MAP 15711.2 NOTE: No. RESOLUTION NO. D~. -~)/.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTR/CT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16181 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of armual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TR 16181 January 2, 2002 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Texritory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The aimual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds ofarmual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings ofthe Maintenance Districts, including the levy ofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of thc Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: SRG/CAMREAL, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company The legal description of the Property is: LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK "Y", ACCORDING TO PRELIMINARY MAP OF THE ETIWANDA COLONY LNADS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 24 AND LOT "A" OF TRACT 15711-2, M.B. 279 PAGES 1 THROUGH 5, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 /32 E~HI~IT A-R ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA fqORTII Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA): Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (LMD #9) represents landscape sites throughout the Lower Etiwanda Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands and street trees. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD # 1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA): Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the South Etiwanda area. B-1 Exhibit B (continued) Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2001/2002) For Project: TRACT 16181 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 --- 4 SLD # 8 5* --- Landscaping Community Trail DGSF Turf SF Non-Turf SF Trees EA *Existing items installed with original project 66 Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 S 8 L 9 --- 272 272 272 272 B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2001/2002 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $375.91 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 269 1.0 269 $375.91 $101,119.79 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16181) is: 272 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $375.91 Rate Per A.U. = $102,247.52 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land llse llnit Type Units 11nits Factor llnlt~ Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel t8,894.00 1.00 18,894.00 $17.77 $335,746.38 Multi- Unit 6,563.00 1.00 6,563.00 $17.77 $116,624.51 Family Commercial Acre 2,245.47 2.00 4,490.94 $17.7'7 $79,804.00 TOTAL $532,174.89 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16181) is: 272 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $4,833.44 Annual Assessment C-1 Exhibit C (continued) STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $193.75 for the Fiscal Year 2001/02. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use [/nit Type l/nits Units Factor llnit~ Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 350 1.00 350 $193.75 $67,812.50 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16181) is: 272 Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $193.75 Rate Per A.U. -- $52,700.00 Annual Assessment C-2 /$7 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTI~E NT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer ACCEPTANCE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FRON VIC CHEN AND LOIS CHEN FOR DR 00-08, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TM STREET AND SANTA ANITA AVENUE, SUBMITI'ED BY VIC CHEN A DEVELOPER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing it to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 00-08, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 12, 2000, by City Council on February 7, 2001 for a development of a 81,960 square foot industrial warehouse building on 3.96 acres of land. The Developers, Vic Chen and Lois Chen, were unable to start undergrounding the overhead utility as conditioned due to Edison's tight schedule and economic hardship, and requested the City allow them to postpone the underground requirement. The City Planner reviewed the request and has agreed to allow a postponement with the stipulation the work be done within three years and the applicant record this lien agreement insuring the work will be completed.. A copy of the agreement is available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WJO:HM:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. t~)~_- ~/,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM VIC CHEN AND LOIS CHEN AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANDCITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME (APN 229-331-07), FOR DR 00-08 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, overhead utility underground established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for the development of an industrial warehouse has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Vic Chen and Lois Chen. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. VICINITY MAI" .,..,,.~.~~~ CITY OF RAHCHO CUCAMONGA :? ' COUNTY OF SAN BEFLNAFI,DI"O . t/*/~ RAN CH O CUCAMONGA $ ffRepor DATE: January 2, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND 15711-2, LOCATED ON ETIWANDA AVENUE, BETVVEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MILLER, SUBMITTED BY RC HOMES, LLC RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extensions and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public Improvements for Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2 were approved by the City Council on June 7, 2000. The developer, RC Homes, LLC, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extensions are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, Will,am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is 1¢/ NILL~IDE NILLDIDE WILSON HISHLAND UPLAND IAUELIHE FONTANA Otb THE cITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONOA 4Ih ONTAAIO RESOLUTION NO. ~),~.. "' (~)/7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACTS 1571'1-1 AND 15711-2 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 6, 2000, by RC Homes, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located between Foothill Boulevard and Miller. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which Improvement Agreement Extension. is secured and is identified in said NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 ENGINEERING DIVISION ATTENTION: LINDA BEEK LINDA, I AM REQUESTING AN EXTENSION FOR PERMIT NUMBER ROW2001-00293 EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/01. THE WORK WAS NOT COMPLETED DUE TO SEVERAL REASONS. FIRST, WE RECENTLY HAD ACHANGE IN PERSONNEL. WE DID NOT HAVE A PERMANENT ON-SITE SUPERINTENDEANT FOR ALMOST ONE MONTH. SECOND, WE HAVE HAD SOME PROBLEMS WITH THE OTHER SUBCONTRACTORS AND THEIR PERSONNEL. ALSO, THE LANDASCAPING COMPANY THAT WE SUBCONTRACTED HAS BEEN EXTREMELY BUSY AND BEGAN THE WORK LATER THAN PREVISOUSLY ANTICIPATED. ENCLOSEDARE THE COMPLETED FORMS WITH THE REQUIRED SIGNATURES AND TWO CHECKS FOR $251.00 EACH. (ONE FOR EACH TRACT). IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT 949-660-8988 X 200. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. SINCERELY, TARYN YOUNG ASSISTANT PROJECT COORDINATOR PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 1000 Dove Street · Suite 100 · Newport Beach ° CA 92660 · Tel 949-660-8988 · roux 949-660-8866 R A N CUCAMONGA $ l Repo DALE: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-09, SUBMITTED BY BEAR GULCH LLC, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for CUP 97-09 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of CUP 97-09, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Material Bond. Developer: BEAR GULCH LLC Release: Faithful Performance Bond SD0003300 $125,000 Release: Labor and Material Bond SD0003300 $ 62,500 Respectfully submitted, W il City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is HILLSIDE: BANYAN UPLAND HILLSIDE WILSON HIOHLAND BABELIHE 4th ONTAIIIO FONTANA THE CITY OF' RANCHO CLICAMOI~A RESOLUTION NO. (~)~--- ~/ (~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 97-09 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for CUP 97-09, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G a Staff Report DATI~ January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND, AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 97-19, SUBMITTED BY W9NVLA REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LOCATED AT 10900 FOURTH STREET RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for MDR 97-19 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of MDR 97-19, located at 10900 Fourth Street, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Pen~ormance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond. Developer: W9/VVLA REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Release: Faithful Performance Bond 515937S $11,000 Release: Labor and Material Bond 515937S $ 5,500 Respectfully submitted, Williar~. O Neil City Engineer fllLLSIDE BANYAN HILLSIDE WILSON HIOHLAND UPLAND BABELINE :TORIA FONTANA Otb THE cITY OF' RAi~HO CI. ICAMOI~A 4ih ONTARIO RESOLUTION NO. ~),,Z. "' ~)/~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 97-19 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for MDR 97-19, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. [~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A S' tff Report DA'rE: Janua~ 2,2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15531, SUBMITTED BY OVERLAND RC 29, LLC, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND MAYBERRY AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 15531 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15531, located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Mayberry Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that the City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and the Labor and Material Bond. Developer; Overland RC 29, LLC 1700 Hamner Avenue Norco, CA 91769-2957 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 3SM91164400 $452,200 Release: Labor and Material Bond 3SM91164400 $226,100 Re~sp.~ctfully submitted, City Engineer /.5/ TRACT 15531 HIGHLAND NO SCALE AVENUE FINCH STREET HF-~ THER $~EET IgTH RING AVENUE $~E~ Vicini'~.y Map /,.q2 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15531 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 15531, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA F~NGINI~I~ING D~PAI~Tr~gNT Staff Report DATE: TO: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP; (~ity Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techni~ian-~ RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. BX12296250 IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,256.64, FOR THE ADA 1999/2000 ACCESS RAMP AND DRIVE APPROACH IMPROVEMENT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ALONG HERMOSA AVENUE, HAVEN AVENUE, 6TM STREET AND ARROW ROUTE, CONTRACT NO. 00-016 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council autl~orize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. BX12296250 in the amount of $12,256.64 for the ADA 1999/2000 Access Ramp and Drive Approach Improvement at Various Locations Along Hermosa Avenue, Haven Avenue, 6th Street and Arrow Route, Contract No. 00-016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: K.A.S. Equipment & Rental, Inc. P.O. Box 9570 Ontario, CA 91762 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond Respectfully submitted, Willia"m J. O'Neil City Engineer BX12296250 $12,256.64 WJO:JAD/RO:Is /sC EXHIBIT" " ~ LEGEND #.T& ~ ~ro~ Si~ ADA t999/2000 ACCESS RAMP AND DRIVE APPROACH IMPROVEMENTS VICINITY MAP R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA ENGINEERING DEDARTI, IEN T Staff Report DA~: Janua~ 2,2002 TO: FROM: SUBJECt: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lucinda Hackett, Project Manager~/' Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tech'nTcia'n ~ ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 6TM STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 00-063 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $158,775.31 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of the 6~h Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 00-063 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $224,775.00. Also, approve the final contract amount of $158,775.31. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $158,775.31, which included three contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of minus 29.36%. The original amount approved by Council was $247,253.00 ($224,775.00 plus 10%). Resp~e~,ly submitted," .- Wiilia ~.~'. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LH/RO:Is Attachments 6TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (FROM MTT,T,T'K3~N AVE. TO HAVEN AVENUE) .1 PROJECT /$7 RESOLUTION NO. ~)~. -~)~. / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 6TM STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 00-063 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the 6th Street Pavement Rehabilitation from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue, Contract No. 00-063, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SlaffReport DALE: Janua~ 2,2002 FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Cotmcil Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lucinda HackeR, Project Manager ~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician'~,l~ ACCEPT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EAST AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 00-035 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $533,370.09 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the construction of the East Avenue and Victoria Street Improvements, Contract No. 00-035 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $439,343.00. Also, approve the final contract amount of $533,370.09. BAC KGROUND/ANALYSlS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $533,370.09, which included six contract change orders resulting in a change in the original contract amount of 18.10%. The original amount approved by Council was $483,277.53 ($439,343.21 plus 10%). Respectfully submitted, Willi~ J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LH/RO:Is Attachments RANCHO CUCAMONGA Project Site ~¢TH ST "'1 UPLAND FOO~I'HILL I~L W ONTARIO CITY EAST OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AVENUE / VICTORIA STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION MAP N.T.S. RESOLUTION NO. ~),2- (~),~-. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE EAST AVENUE AND VICTORIA STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 00-035 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the East Avenue and Victoria Street Improvements, Contract No. 00-035, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA S Repo January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager 2001 AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDUL F RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the adoption of the attached resolution, which will establish and/or adjust certain fees for Police Department, Engineering Division, Planning Division and the City Clerk's Office. Any fee model is based on a comparison of use, participation and attendance reflective of actual cost. It is analyzed and updated annually. Please see summary schedule for new fees and services. Other fees and services remain unchanged. Also, fee changes have been bolded and italicized in the resolution for your review. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attach. RESOLUTION NO. 02-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A NEW COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PERMITS AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY ALL CITY DEPART- MENTS, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, BY MODIFYING CERTAIN FEES ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION 00-286 A. RECITALS. ¢) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, local agencies shall hold a public meeting at which oral or written presentations may be made; and (ii) Notice of the time and place of the hearing has been propedy provided; and (iii) No valid request for mailed notice is on file with the City; and (iv) Copies of the required data were made available in the City Clerk's office to the public on Monday, December 17th, 2001; and (v) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the following fees are established: SECTION 1: t.0 BUILDING AND SAFETY FEES Buildin.q Permit Fees A fee for each building permit or service shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Total Valuation of Work Fees $1.00 to $1,000.® ................................ $25.® $1,001.°°to$2.® ................................. $25.® for the first $1,000.® plus $2.® for each additional $100.® or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 2 of 53 Total Valuation of Work Fees $2,001.°°to $25,000.® ........................ $45.°° for the first $2,000.0o plus $7.~° for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.o0 $25,001-°°to$50,000.°° ...................... $217.50 for the first $25,000.® plus $5.50 for each additional $1,000.® of fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.®. $50,001-°°to$100,000.°° .................... $355.°0 for the first $50,000.® plus $4.°° for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.®. $100,000.°°and over ........................... $555.o0 for the first $100,000.® plus $2.5o for each additional $1,000.® or fraction thereof. 1.1 Plan Review Fees (a) When the valuation of proposed construction exceeds one thousand dollars, and a plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid to the Building Official at the time of plan submittal. (b) Plan review fees for buildings and structures shall be equal to seventy-five percent (75%) of the building permit fees set forth in Section 1.0 herein. (c) Plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and plumbing work shall be equal to 25% of the total permit fee as set forth under the pertinent Section 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 herein. (d) Plan review fees for grading shall be as set forth in the following schedule: Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 3 of 53 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 50 - 100 yards .................................. $50.® 101 - 500 yards ................................ $100.® 501 - 1,000 yards ............................. $200.® 1,001 - 2,000 yards .......................... $250.® 2,001 - 3,000 yards .......................... $300.® 3,001 - 4,000 yards .......................... $350.® 4,001 - 5,000 yards .......................... $400.® 5,001 - 10,000 yards ........................ $500.® 10,001 - 50,000 yards ...................... $600.® 50,001 - 100,000 yards .................... $700.® 100,001 yards - and up .................... $900.® The sum of Cut and Fill Yardage shall be used in computing Grading Permit and Plan Checking Fees. (e) Repetitive plan checking of production tract homes that have been previously plan checked and approved under adopted codes may have the plan check fees reduced by 50% (fifty percent). This will only apply to plans when the Design Architect submits a letter with his/her wet stamp and signature certifying that plans are identical to the previously approved plans. The new plans shall be wet stamped with a signature of the Design Architect. (f) Additional Plan Checking made necessary due to changes in plans or incomplete plan submission, $55.® per hour for the estimated time of checking revisions. Compliance Inspections/Re-inspections Inspections to determine compliance of existing construction with applicable codes when not included in an active, valid building permit or inspections made necessary due to work not being ready at time specified, or work not corrected after prior written correction notice .................................................................................. $30.00 1.3 Change of Occupancy Change of Occupancy Inspection ....................................................... $50.® 1.4 Relocated Buildings Fees for inspection of a structure to be relocated into or within the City shall be $100.® when located within 25 miles of City offices, plus $2.® per mile, round trip, when located more than 25 miles from City offices. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 4 of 53 1.5 Appeal of Abatement Notice An appeal of a Notice to Abate a substandard or dangerous bud ng .................................................... $100.00 1.6 Inspection for Temporary Utility Connection or Temporary Occupancv nspect on $30 00 1.7 Inspections Outside of Normal Business Hours (Minimum charge, four hours) .................................................. $50.® hourly 1.8 Inspections for Which No Permit Fee Is Specifically Indicated (Minimum charge, one-half hour) ............................................. $50.o0 hourly 1.9 Electrical Permit Fees (a) Permit Issuance For issuing each permit ..................................................... $15.® For issuing each supplemental permit ............................... $ 4.s0 (b) System Fee Schedule NOTE: The following are in addition to permit- issuing fee. New Residential Buildings: The following~fees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building, or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time. For new residential buildings not including the area of garages, carports and other noncommercial automobile storage areas constructed at the same time, per square foot .......................................................... $ .035 For new garages, carports and other minor accessory buildings constructed in conjunction with a new residential building per square foot ..................................... $ .02 For other types of residential occupancies and alterations, additions and modifications to existing residential buildings, use the Unit Fee Schedule. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 5 of 53 Private Swimming Pools, Spas: For new private residential, permanently installed spas, hot tubs or swimming pools for single-family and multi-family occupancies including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming pool, each ........................... $30.® For other types of swimming pools, spas and alterations to existing swimming pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Carnivals and Circuses: Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable-type rides, booths, displays and attractions. For electric generators and electrically driven rides, Each ................................................................................... $15.o0 For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting, Each ..................................................................................... $4.50 For a system of area and booth lighting, each .................... $4.s° For permanently installed rides, booths, displays and attractions, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Services: For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each ..................................................... $18.s° For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1000 amperes in rating, each ........................ $37.5o For services over 600 volts or over 1000 in rating, Each ................................................................................... $75.0o Temporary Power Service: For a temporary service power pole or pedestal including all pole or pedestal-mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each ...................................... $15.oo Resolution No, 02-XXX Page 6 of 53 For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, etc., each ................................................................. $7.50 (c) Unit Fee Schedule: NOTE: The following are in addition to permit issuing fee. Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets: For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and meters. First 20, each .................................... $ .75 Additional outlets, each ....................................................... $ .45 NOTE: For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet. Lighting Fixtures: For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp-holding devices. First 20, each ........................................................ $ .75 Additional fixtures, each ...................................................... $ .45 For pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures, each .......... $ .75 For theatrical-type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each.....$ .75 Residential Appliances: For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter- mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self contained room, console, or through-wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor- operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating, each ..................................................................................... $3.o0 NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 7 of 53 Non-Residential Appliances: For non-residential appliances and self-contained factory- wired, non-residential appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt-ampere (KVA), in rating including medical and dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases, drinking fountains, vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment, each ..................................................................................... $3.00 NOTE: For other types of air conditioners and other motor-driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Power Apparatus: For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus, as follows: Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt- amperes (KVA), or kilovolt-amperes-reactive (KVAR): Up to and including 1, each ................................................. $3.® Over 1 and not over 10, each .............................................. $7.~0 Over 10 and not over 50, each .......................................... $15.® Over 50 and not over 100, each ........................................ $30.® Over 100, each .................................................................. $45.oo NOTE: 1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used. 2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipment. Busways: For trolley and plug-in-type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereof ................................................................. $4.$o NOTE: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug-in-type busways. No fee is required for portable tools. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 8 of 53 Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees: For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit, each ............................. $1 5.® For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee, each ........................... $3.® Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors: For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth ................................................................... $1 1.00 NOTE: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment. 1.10 Plumbing Permits (a) Permit Issuance For the issuance of each permit ........................................ $15.® For issuing each supplemental permit ................................ $4.50 (b).Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fee above) For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping, and back protection therefore) ................................................... $6.® For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer ....... $15.® Rainwater systems --per drain (inside building) .................. $6.® For each cesspool (where permitted) ................................ $22.50 For each private sewage disposal system ........................ $45.® For each water heater and/or vent ...................................... $7.50 For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps .................$1 2.® For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and/or water-treating equipment, each ............................... $3.® For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture .......................................................................... $3.0o Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 9 of 53 For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including back flow protection devices therefore ................ $9.oo For atmospheric-type vacuum breakers not included in lawn sprinkler system: I to 5 .................................................................. $7.50 Over 5, each ...................................................... $1.s° For each backflow protective device other than atmosphedc-type vacuum breakers: 2 inches and smaller .......................................... $7.s° Over 2 inches ................................................... $15.® For each gas piping system of one to four outlets .............. $3.® For each gas piping system of five or more, per outlet ....... $ .75 Swimming pool or spa piping including water heater (not including gas piping) ................................................... $10.® 1.11 Mechanical Permits A fee for each mechanical permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: (a) Permit Issuance For the issuance of each permit ........................................ $15.® For issuing each supplemental permit ................................ $4.s° (b) Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to issuance fees above) For the installation or relocation of each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 100,000 Btu/h ...................................................................... $9.® For the installation or relocation or each forced-air or gravity-type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000 Btu/h ................................................................................... $11.00 For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent ....................................................................... $9.® For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor-mounted unit heater ................................................................................... $9.® /?/ Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 10 of 53 For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit .................................................................. $4.50 For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by this code ....................................... $9.0o For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including three horsepower, or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h ..................................................................................... $9.0o For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower to and including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h and including 500,000 Btu/h ....................... $16.50 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h ............................ $22.5o For installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h ........... $33.00 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h ................ $56.® For each air-handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts attached thereto ................................................................................. $6.5° NOTE: This fee shall not apply to an air-handling unit which is an integral portion of a factory assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in this code. For each air-handling unit over 10,000 cfm ...................... $11.00 For each evaporative cooler other than portable type ........$6.50 For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct ............ $4.5o Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 11 of 53 For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit ................................................................................ $6.00 For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood ..................................................................................... $6.$o For the installation or relocation of each domestic- type incinerator .................................................................. $11.0o For the installation or relocation of each commercial industrial-type incinerator .................................................. $45.® For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code ..................................................................................... $6.s0 1.12 Permit Fees A fee for each Grading Permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 50 cubic yards or less ........................ $15.0o 51 to 100 cubic yards ........................ $22.s° 101 to 1,000 cubic yards ................... $22.5° for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.0° for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards .............. $117.® for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $9.o0 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards .......... $198.0o for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus $40.5° for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 12 of 53 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fees 100,001 cubic yards or more ............. $562.50 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1.13 Application for Plan Duplication Application for duplication processing ................................................. SECTION 2: BUSINESS LICENSE FEES Fees for Business Licenses are found within Title 5 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations and contained in Chapters 5.04, 5.08, 5.12 and 5.16, thereof. SECTION 3: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FEES 3.1 Municipal Code Municipal Code .................................................................................. $150.00 Supplements to the Municipal Code will vary in cost and will be billed accordingly ............................................................................. Amount Variable 3.2 Passport - Miscellaneous Application Processing Fee ......................................................... $15.oo Photos ......................................................................................... $12.0o SECTION 4: COPYING RATES, MEDIA AND SUBSCRIPTION FEE~ Fee Activity Fees Photocopies ....................................... $ .25 per page* Microfilming ........................................ $ .25 per page* $1 .oo per plan page Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 13 of 53 Fee Activity Fees Microfiche Jackets ............................. $1.00 per sheet Audio Tape ......................................... $10.® per tape Video Tape ......................................... $10.® per tape Computer Diskettes ........................... $5.® per diskette Subscriptions Fees Council Agenda ................................. $118.® per year Minutes .............................................. $145.® per year Planning Commission Agenda .......... $ 43.50 per year Minutes .............................................. $160.® per year Historic Preservation Comm. Agenda ............................................... $ 9.® per year Engineering Plans and Specifications per set cost ........................................ Amount Variable Mailing Costs for the above (overnight) ......................................... Amount Variable MaplPlan Reproductions ................ $3.oo per sheet FAX Requests - ALL DEPARTMENTS A maximum of 6 pages may be requested .............................. No Fee** *There will be a minimum charge of $1.°° for 1.3 pages ** If material requested is more than 6 pages, material will be mailed end billed at rate established by this Resolution. SECTION 5: 5.1 Applications ENGINEERING FEES Fees. Certificate of Compliance .................. $1,190.°° Lot Line Adjustment ........................... $1,190.® Amending Map ............................... $1,190.oo Reapportionment Map ....................... $600.® A hvo-sheet Parcel/Tract Map; $30.~ for each additional sheet Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 14 of 53 Street Vacation .................................. $1,156.® Standard AgreementJDoc. Processing ......................................... $298.® Release of Lien Agreement ............... $298.® Certificate of Correction ..................... $256.°° Flood Hazard Letter ........................... $314.® Bond Substitution ............................... $420.® Private Street Designation ................. $495.® Reimbursement Agreement Storm Drain ........................................ $2,227.oo Street and Utilities .............................. $2,827.® Traffic Study Review (Dev. Proj.) ......................................... $751 .o0 5.2 Map and Plan Checkin,q Fees Fees Property Legal Description ................ $584.00 Map Checking Residential Parcel Map ...................... $1,370.® + $180.® per Parcel Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel Maps of 10 lots or less ........... $2,070.® Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel Maps over 10 lots ................... $1,720.® + $35.00 per Parcel or Lot 5.3 Improvement Plans Fees Widening of Existing Streets ............. $1.3s per LF + sheet Charge for Interior Streets Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 15 of 53 Interior Streets Fees 1-2 Sheets: ......................................... $1,370.® per sheet 3-5 Sheets: ......................................... $2,740.® + $1,200.® per sheet over 2 sheets 6-10 Sheets: ...................................... $6,340.°° + $1,095.® per sheet over 5 sheets 11 or More: ......................................... $11,815.® + $1,025.® per sheet over 10 sheets Storm Drain Plans .............................. Same as for Interior Streets Hydroloqy Study Fees Drainage Areas up to 150 Acres .......$1,370.® Drainage Areas over 150 Acres ........$2,740.® Landscape and Irrigation Plans for City-Maintained Areas .................. $400.® per sheet For map and plan checking, the fees for rush checking, when approved by the City Engineer, will be 50% greater than those listed above. The fees for checking the revisions to approved plans will be on the basis of actual costs at hourly rates as determined by the City Engineer with a minimum fee of $100.®. Public Works Construction Permit Fee 5% of Improvement Cost to $25,000.®, minimum $50.® 4.5% of Improvement Cost for next $75,000.® 4% of Improvement Cost over $100,000.® The Improvement Cost of a project shall be based on the Engineer's Cost Estimate as shown on Surety Bond and as approved by the City Engineer. A refundable deposit is also required. NOTE: Development Impact Fees may also apply and are addressed under separate resolutions. 177 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 16 of 53 5.5 Oversize Loads Fees Single Permit*. ................................... $15.® Repetitive Permit* .............................. $70.® initial fee + $15.® per month renewal fee to a maximum of 6 months Annual Permit*. .................................. $70.® per year * These fees are based on the provisions of the California Vehicle Code Section 35795 and CalTrans Fee Schedule. 5.6 Other Fees Collection of San Bernardino County fees, as adopted by the County, including but not limited to: · Documentary Handling Fee for Filing Notice of Determination · Development Review Fees · County Recording Fee · County Printing Fee SECTION 6: 6.1 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FEES These Fees have been adopted by the Fire Board Plans Checkinq Fees Includes Plan Review and two Inspections. Does NOT include Fee for any required Fire District Permits. A. Start-Up Fee for Commemial, Industrial or Multi-family Dwelling Units, paid prior to TRC .... $82.® B. Plan Review Fees 1. Single Family Residence ................................................. $132.® 2. Single Family Residential Tract, per Phase .................... $132.°° 3. Multi-Family Residential, per Building ............................. $677.® 4. Commercial and Industrial Development, per Building... $677.® 5. Water Plan/Underground Water Supply ......................... $132.® 6. Conditional Use Permit .................................................... $132.® 7. Minor Development Review ............................................ $132.® 8. Parcel Map Review .......................................................... $132.o0 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 17 of 53 Permit Fees 9. Tenant Improvement; per hour, one hour minimum ......... $87.® 10. Special Events Review ...................................................... $87.® 11. Accessory Plans Review: Aisles, Access, Seating, Etc .............................................. $66.o0 12. Alternate Method Approval ................................................ $92.0o 13. Revision to existing Plan (e.g., As-Builts, Excluding TI Plans) .................................. $92.® 14. New Fire Sprinkler Systems, Standpipes or over ten heads ......................................... $164.00 15. Fire Sprinkler Alteration, ten heads or less ....................... $92.® 16. Pre-Engineered Fire Protection Systems ........................ $147.® 17. Fire Detection and Alarm Systems .................................. $154.® 18. Flammable Finishes Spray Booth, per booth .................. $164.® 19. LPG Tank Installation Review, per tank .......................... $147.® Underground Storage Tank Removal Review, per tank ............................................................................ $147.o0 21. Flammable & Combustible Liquid, Tank & Piping ........... $147.® 22. Failure to keep Appointment, one hour minimum ............. $66.® 23. Microfilm Charges, per page ............................................... $1.00 24. Minor Plan Review not requiring a District Inspection ....No Fee Inspection Fees Per hour, one hour minimum 1. Field Inspection required after the Initial and Follow-Up Inspection ................................................ $110.® Failure to keep an Inspection Appointment ....................... $66.00 Field Inspection of Self-Inspection Occupancies, Failure to Comply ............................................................... $66.00 Fire Flow Test, Witness Test ............................................. $87.oo Unscheduled Field Inspection or Investigation ................. $66.o0 Same Day, Short Notice Inspection .................................. $87.® [Initial Permit and subsequent renewal of Permit unless otherwise indicated (e.g. one time only Permit activity)] A.Permits 1. General Use Permit ........................................................... $82.0o 2. Access Control ................................................................. No Fee 3. Aerosol Products (more than 500 lbs. of Level 2 or 3) ...$131 .oo 4. Aircraft Refueling Vehicles ................................................ $95.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 18 of 53 5. Aircraft Repair Hangar ....................................................... $84.oo 6. Automobile Wrecking Yard ................................................ $82.® 7. Asbestos Removal ........................................................... $132.00 8. Bowling Pin or Alley Refinishing involving Flammable Finishes .......................................................... $82.0o 9. Candles and Open Flames in Assembly Areas .... NOT PERMITTED 10. Carnivals and Fairs (see also 6.2E) ................................ $132.® 11. Cellulose Nitrate Film ........................................................ $82.® 12. Cellulose Nitrate Storage, more than 25 lbs ..................... $84.® 13. Combustible Fiber Storage, more than 100 cubic feet ..... $82.® 14. Combustible Material Storage, more than 2,500 cubic feet .............................................. $115.® 15. Compressed Gases: a. Corrosive, 200 cubic feet or more ................................. $95.® b. Flammable, 200 cubic feet or more .............................. $84.® c. Highly Toxic, any amount .............................................. $95.® d. Iner'dSimple Asphyxiant, 6,000 cubic feet or more ....... $85.® e. Irritant, 200 cubic feet or more ...................................... $84.® f. Other Health Hazards, 650 cubic feet or more ............. $84.® g. Oxidizing (includes Oxygen), 504 cubic feet or more... $84.® h. Pyrophoric, any amount ................................................ $95.® i. Radioactive, any amount .............................................. $98.® j. Sensitizer, 200 cubic feet or more ................................ $95.® k. Toxic, any amount ......................................................... $95.o0 I. Unstable (Reactive), any amount ............................... $132.® 16. Commercial Rubbish-Handling Operations ....................... $84.® 17. Cryogens: a. Corrosive -- Inside, over 1 gallon .................................. $95.® b. Corrosive -- Outside, over 1 gallon .............................. $95.® c. Flammable -- Inside, over I gallon ............................... $84.® d. Flammable -- Outside, 60 gallons or more ................... $84.® e. Highly toxic - Inside, over 1 gallon ............................... $95.® f. Highly toxic -- Outside, over 1 gallon ............................ $95.® g. Nonflammable -- Inside, 60 gallons or more ................$95.® h. Nonflammable -- Outside, 500 gallons or more ............ $84.® i. Oxidize -- Inside, 50 gallons or more ............................ $84.® j. Oxidizer -- Outside, 50 gallons or more ........................ $84.® 18. Dry Cleaning Plants ......................................................... $132.® 19. Dust-Producing Operations ............................................... $84.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 19 of 53 20. Explosives or Blasting Agents: a. Storage, Manufacture, Process or Sell ....................... $84.oo b. Use ............................................................................. $150.oo 21. Fire Hydrants and Water-Control Valves, use for other purposes ...................................................... $ 84.oo 22. Fire Protection Systems and Equipment, per building ....No Fee 23. Fireworks: a. Retail Sales ...................................................... NOT PERMITTED b. Aerial Displays (see also 6.2E) ................................... $84.® 24. Flammable or Combustible Liquids: a. Pipeline, to Use, Operate, Repair or modify a Pipeline ....................................... $132.® b. Class I Liquids, more than 5 gallons Inside a Building ......................... $84.oo c. Class I Liquids, more than 10 gallons Outside a Building .................... $84.® Exceptions to b. & c.: 1. Storage or use of C/ass I Liquids in Vehicle, Vessel, Aircraft or Equipment Fuel Tanks. 2. Storage or use of Paints, Oils, Varnishes, or Similar Mixtures for Maintenance, Painting or Similar Purposes for less than 30 days. Class II or II-A Liquids, more than 25 Gallons Inside a Building ..................... $ 84.® Class II or III-A Liquids, more than 60 gallons Outside of a Building ............... $ 84.oo To remove Class I or II Liquids from an UST by other than Normal Operation ...........$ 95.® Installation, Construction, Alteration or Operation where Flammable or Combustible Liquids are Produced, Processed, Transported, Stored, Dispensed or Used in any of the following: Tank Vehicles ........................................................ $95.oo Equipment ............................................................ $105.® Tanks, per tank .................................................... $121.°° Plants ................................................................... $132.® Terminals ............................................................. $132.® Wells, per well ....................................................... $ 84.oo Fuel-Dispensing Stations (Sing e and/or Multiple Pump Stations) ........................................ $ 95.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 20 of 53 25. 26. 27. Refineries ............................................................. $132.® Distilleries ............................................................. $132.0o h. Installation, Alteration, Removal, Abandon, Place Temporarily out of Service or otherwise Dispose of a tank which contained Flammable or Combustible LiquidS132.® i. To change the type of contents in a Flammable or Combustible LiquidS132.® Fruit Ripening .................................................................. $105.00 Fumigation or Thermal Insecticidal Fogging ................... $121.0o Hazardous Materials: (see also other Permit Sections) For multiple Permits within this Section 25, the Fee will be the total of all related Permits to a maximum of $400.® or Actual Costs, whichever is greater. a. Carcinogens, 10 lbs. or more .................................... $132.00 b. Corrosive Liquids, 55 gallons or more ......................... $84.® c. Corrosive Solids, 500 lbs. or more .............................. $95.® d. Flammable Solids, 100 lbs. or more ............................ $95.® e. Highly Toxic Liquids and Solids, any amount ............. $95.°° f. Irritant Liquids, 55 gallons or more .............................. $84.® g. Irritant Solids, 500 lbs. or more ................................... $84.o0 h. Oxidizing Liquids: Class 4, any amount .................................................... $84.oo Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.® Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® Class 1,500 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® i. Oxidizing Solids: Class 4, any amount .................................................... $84.® Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.°0 Class 2, 100 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® Class 1,500 lbs. or more ............................................. $84.® Organic Peroxide Liquids and Solids: Class 1, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, any amount .................................................... $95.oo Class 3, 10 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.® Class 4, 20 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.® Other Health Hazards: Liquids, 55 gallons or more ......................................... $84.oo Solids, 500 lbs. or more ............................................... $84.00 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 21 of 53 I. Pyrophoric Liquids, any amount .................................. $95.oo m. Pyrophoric Solids, any amount .................................... $95.® n. Sensitizer Liquids, 55 gallons or more ........................ $95.® o. Sensitizer Solids, 500 lbs. or more .............................. $95.® p. Toxic Liquids, 10 gallons or more ............................... $95.o0 q. Toxic Solids, 100 lbs. or more ..................................... $95.® r. Unstable (Reactive) Liquids: Class 4, any amount .................................................. $132.® Class 3, any amount .................................................. $132.® Class 2, 5 gallons or more ......................................... $132.® Class 1, 10 gallons or more ....................................... $132.0o s. Unstable (Reactive) Solids: Class 4, any amount .................................................. $132.® Class 3, any amount .................................................. $132.00 Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ............................................. $132.® Class 1,100 lbs. or more ........................................... $132.® t. Water-Reactive Liquids: Class 3, any amount .................................................... $95.® Class 2, 5 gallons or more ........................................... $95.oo Class 1, 10 gallons or more ......................................... $95.® u. Water-Reactive Solids: Class 3, any amount .................................................... $95.00 Class 2, 50 lbs. or more ............................................... $95.°o Class 1,100 lbs. or more ............................................. $95.® 28. Hazardous Production Materials for H-6 Occupancies... $132.® 29. High Piled Combustible Storage ....................................... $99.00 30.Liquefied Petroleum Gases; Store, Use, Handle or Dispense .................................. $84.0o 31. Liquid or Gas-Fueled Vehicles or Equipment in Assembly Buildings ............................... $105.® 32. Lumber Yards .................................................................... $84.00 33. Magnesium Workings ...................................................... $121.00 34. Mall, Covered (see also 6.211D4) ....................................... $84.00 35. Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Stations ......................... $100.® 36. Open Burning ................................................................... No Fee 37. Organic Coatings ............................................................. $132.® 38. Ovens: Industrial Baking or Drying ................................... $84.® 39. Pallet Storage .................................................................... $84.oo Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 22 of 53 40. Places of Assembly: a. A-4 Stadiums, Reviewing Stands and Amusement Park .................... $84.® b. A-3 Occupant Load of 50 to 299 without a Stage ....... $95.® c. A-2.1, Occupant Load of 300 or more without a Stage ................................. $147.® d. A-2 Occupant Load of less than 1000 with a Stage .................................. $169.® e. A-1 Occupant Load of 1000 or more with a Stage .................................... $225.® 41. Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material (See also 6.2E) .................................................................. $84.® 42. Radioactive Materials ...................................................... $132.°° 43. Refrigeration Equipment .................................................. $115.oo 44. Repair Garages ................................................................. $84.00 45. Spraying or Dipping ........................................................... $84.® 46. Tents, Canopies and Temporary Membrane Structures: a. 201 to 400 square feet ................................................. $84.® b. 401 to 1500square feet ............................................. $110.® c. 1501 to 15,000 square feet ....................................... $147.® d. 15,001 to 30,000 square feet .................................... $178.® e. Over 30,000 square feet ............................................ $210.® 47. Tire Storage ..................................................................... $132.oo 48. Welding and Cutting Operations ...................................... $ 84.® II. Special Services A. Excessive or Malicious False Alarms causing Response of Fire Apparatus. 1. Response due to "Failure to Notify" the Fire Department when working on or testing Sprinkler or Fire Alarm System. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding 1/2 hour, minimum charge. 2. Malicious False Alarms. $153.00 per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 23 of 53 3. Response Due to Alarm Malfunction. $153.°° per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding to all False Alarms in excess of two (2) False Alarms in 30 days with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. Response to False Alarms due to negligence, tampering with the system, construction or modification of the building. $153.°° per hour per piece of Emergency Apparatus responding with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. Response to False Alarm by Battalion Chief and/or Fire Inspector. $50.°° per hour with 1/2 hour, minimum charge. Response to Fire Setter Incidents (Juvenile or Adult) and "DUI" Callouts: 1. Cost Recovery for Emergency Apparatus responding. $2.50 per minute per piece of Equipment. 2. Cost Recovery for Personnel responding. $ .83 per minute per Person. 3. Cost Recovery for Battalion Chief or Fire Investigator responding. $ .45 per minute, Response to mitigate Extended Hazardous Chemical and Material Incidents beyond Normal Service requires (this includes response to railroad properties, freeways, and aircraft crashes). 1. Hazardous Incident, Overhead and Command, per hour. $273.00 per hour per piece of Apparatus 2. Apparatus and Crews assigned to the Incident, per hour. $170.00 per hour per piece of Equipment 3. Specialized Resources - HAZMAT Crews and Equipment. Actual Costs 4. Materials and Supplies used for the Incident. Actual Costs Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 24 of 53 E. Special Activities - Apparatus and Crews assigned to activities that require the services, at Permit"tees expense, of one or more standby Firefighters. $153.°° per hour per piece of Apparatus $ 30.°° per hour, two-hour minimum per District employee, two-hour minimum charge. Accelerant Detection Canine Team, Use of Arson K-9 Team by other Agencies. Fire Scene Examinations: $50.00 per hour, two-hour minimum charge Hourly Travel Rate: $25.00 per hour, one-hour minimum, to and from Search Area Mileage, round trip ................................................ $ .35 mile Administrative Reports ................................ $25.°° per hour Mounted Photographs ......................................... $'1.5° each G. Board of Appeals Requiring a Special Meeting .................................... $245.°° SECTION 7: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FEES Request Fees GIS Data, Digital Format ................... $37.00 per hour plus costs of material(s) Plots ............................................. $30.® CD ROMS .................................... $1.00 Diskettes ....................................... $ .30 ZIP Disc ........................................ $10.00 JAZ Disc ....................................... $90.® 4mm Tape .................................... $29.°0 Zoning Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............ $30.0o Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" BAN Plan Map (Vicinity) ......$1.0o Zoning or General 8-1/2 X 11" Color Plan Map (Vicinity) ..... $5.® General Plan Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............ $30.® Flood Plain Map 34 X 44" Color, E Size Sheet ............ $30.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 25 of 53 Request Fees Land Available for Potential Development Report- Citywide ....... $25.00 Land Available for Potential Development Report - Residential ..$15.00 Land Available for Potential Development Report- Commercial/Industrial ....................... $15.® Land Available for Potential Development Report - Specific Plan ..................................... $15.® Land Available for Potential Development Report -- Citywide 34 X 44" Color, 2 "E" Size Sheets .............................. $50.® Special Reports and/or Maps ........... Time and Materials + $500.® Deposit SECTION 8: LIBRARY FEES These Fees have been adopted by the Library Board of Trustees Fines. Fines are based on item rather than patron. For example: A child borrowing adult materials will be assessed an adult overdue fine. Overdue Fine Per Item: Fine Borrowing Per Day Maximum Thresholds Ad ult ............... $ .25 ..................... $10.°° .................... $5.00 Children .......... $ .10 ..................... $ 5.® ..................... $5.® Video .............. $1.°° ...................... $10. oo .................... _ ..... Best Seller Videos ............ $2.°° ...................... $10.°° .................... _ .... DVD ................ $2.o0 ...................... $10.°° .................... _ .... CD/ROM Software ......... $2.°° ...................... $10.°° .................... _ ...... Magazine .......$ .10 ..................... $1.® ..................... . ..... Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 26 of 53 Rental Fees Per Item: Loan Per Item Rental Fee Period Type Limit Video .............. $1.°° ...................... 7 days .................. 8 video titles, total Business Series Video .............. $2.® ...................... 3 days .................. 8 video titles, total Best Seller Videos ............ $2.°° ...................... 3 days .................. 8 video titles, total DVD ................ $2.® ...................... 7 days .................. 4 DVD titles, total Best Seller DVD ................ $2.® ...................... 3 days .................. 4 DVD titles, total Audio Cassette ......... $ .25/cassette ......14 days ................ 4 audio cassette titles $2.® max. CD .................. $ .25 ..................... 14 days ................ 4 CD titles Best Seller CD .................. $ .50 ..................... 14 days ................ 4 CD titles Read Alongs .. $ .25/cassette ...... 14 days ................ 4 Read Along titles Best Seller Rental Books .$1.°° ...................... 7 days .................. 4 books/No Reserves CD/ROM Software ......... $2.® ...................... 7 days .................. 4 CD/ROM titles Test/Deposit Books ............. $20.® Refundable Deposit Charged .. Checks Allowed; Credit Card Allowed Fees for Services: Interlibrary Loan ................................. $2.® Reserves ............................................ $ .50 Marketing Library Card ...................... $3.® Lost Library Card ............................... $2.® for regular card $3.® for marketing card Collection Fee ................................... $15.® per account Test Monitoring Fee ........................... $10.® per test session Temporary Card ................................. $ .50 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 27 of 53 Technoloqy Center: Fee In-house Computer Rental ................ $3.® per hour Technology Classes Fee Internet Basic Seamhing ................... $15.® per class Internet Intermediate Searching ........ $15.® per class Internet Advanced Searching ............ $15.® per class Printouts: Fee Color ................................................... $ .30 BNV .................................................... $ .10 Photocopies: Fee Color Photocopies ............................. $ .75 BNV Photocopies: Coin .................................................... $ .15 Debit Card .......................................... $ .10 Microform Copies ............................... $ .15 Research/Business Services: Fee Business Locator Services ................$5.® per business no charge f business is not located 00 Brief Business Profile ........................ $10. per business no charge f business is not located Each additional profile, $6.® Business Lists on Demand ................ $ .05 cents per record $10.~° minimum On line Data Base Searches ............. Cost of Online Connect Time + $5.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 28 of 53 Lost Materials: Item Item Cost Processinq Fee Books ............. Original Cost .............. + $5.® Media ............. Odginal Cost .............. + $6.® Paperback Books Odginal Cost ....... + $2.5o Magazines ...... $3.°° ............................ + $1 .oo SECTION 9: PLANNING FEES 9.1 Applications Damaged Materials: Type of Damage/Loss Processing Fee Bar Code Removed ........................... $2.® Book(s) .............................................. List Cost in Computer Cover Damaged ........................... $5.® Plastic Cover Damaged ............... $2.® Page Torn .................................... $1 .oo per page Compact Disc(s) .............................. List Cost in Computer Broken Jewel Case: Singles .......................................... $1 .s0 Doubles ........................................ $3.°° Loss of Liner Notes ............................ $5.® Loss of Book/Pamphlets .................... $5.® Video Cassette(s) ............................. List Cost in Computer Shell Replacement ....................... $5.® Storage Case Damage ................ $5.® Audio Book(s) ................................. List Cost in Computer Double Case ................................ $5.® 4 Storage Case ............................ $6.® 12 Storage Case ..........................$7.® Cassette Boxes ............................ $1 .o0 Those charged as a base fee, plus a per unit or per acre amount, with a maximum set at three times the base fee. Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee Tentative Tract Map $2,987 oo $60 o0 er d/u .......$8,961.°° Tentative Parcel Map ..................... $2,514.°° ............. None .................. $2,514.oo Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 29 of 53 Application Base Fee Per Unit Fee Maximum Fee Conditional Use Permit ....................... $2,921 .oo .............. $292.® per acre ...$8,763.® Development/Design Review- Residential (5 or more) ....................... $2,851.°° .............. $57.® per d/u .......$8,553.® Development/Design Review- Commercial/Industrial ....................... $2,851 .oo .............. $285.® per acre ... $8,553.® Initial Study ....................... $225.® .................. $22.°° per acre .....$675.® General Plan Amendment ....................... $2,866.® .............. $287.® per acre ...$8,598.® Specific/Commercial Plan Amendment. * ....................... $2,866.oo .............. $287.® per acre ... $8,598.°° Development District Amendment* ....................... $2,866.°° .............. $287.oo per acre... $8,598.°° · Should be charged at half rate if filed in conjunction with a General Plan Amendment. 9.~2 Applications Those charged on a time-and-materials basis with a deposit taken up front. Application Deposit Amount EIR Review - Sensitive ............................ $10,000.0o Development Agreement Review ............ $5,000.® Mitigation Plan - Complex ....................... $1,000.® Annexation ............................................... $2,000.oo Development Agreement ......................... $2,000.°° New Specific/Community Plan ................ $10,000.o0 EIR Preparation ....................................... $5,000.o0 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 30 of 53 9.3 Other Application Fees Application Fee Non-Construction CUP ............................ $435.® Uniform Sign Program ............................. $580.® Minor Exception ....................................... $170.°° Dev/Desi(]n Review: 4 du's or less ............................................ $1,027.® Variance ................................................... $871.00 Variance: 4 du's or less ............................................ $291.°° Use Determination ................................... $315.® Preliminary Review .................................. $325.® Minor Development Review .................... $296.® Time Extension ........................................ $549.® Minor Time Extension ...................... : ....... $136.® Sign Permit .............................................. $51.0o Hillside Development Review 5 or more du's .......................................... $1,462.® Hillside Development Review 4 or less du's ............................................ $244.oo Temporary Use Permit ............................ $68.® Temporary Use Permit Model Home....$2~9.oo EIR Review Only ...................................... $2,370.® Landmark Application .............................. $728.® Residential and Small Business .............. No Fee Landmark Alteration ................................ $835.® Residential and Small Business .............. No Fee Mills Act Application ................................. $724.® Residential and Small Business .............. No Fee Mitigation Plan (Simple) ........................... $719.® Mitigation Plan (Complex) ....................... (See 9.2) 9...~4 Appeal Fees Application Fee Appeal of a City Planner Decision ........... $62.® Appeal of a Commission Dec s on in (~onnection w th an App cat on ...$126 00 Appeal of a Tract Map .........................$251.oo or Parcel Map Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 31 of 53 9.5 Other Fees Application Fee Pre-apBlication Review (Plann~ng Commission) ........................... $325.® Entertainment Permit ............................... $571.00 Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit ......... $571.°° Home Occupation Permit ........................ $53.® Large Family Day Care Permit ................ $170.® Public Convenience or Necessities (Alcohol Beverage Control Licenses) ................................................................. $315.® Recycling Facilities Permit ...................... $296.® Status Map Application ............................ $15.® Trail Easement Vacation ......................... $1,190,® Tree Removal/New Development ........... $432.® Tree Removal/Existing Development ................................................................. $72.°° Land Use Verification Report .................. $25.00 NOTE:Planning Division Fees for documents, which are individually priced, are contained in the Document Price List. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 32 of 53 SECTION 10: RECREATION FEES Following are current fees for recreation activities and rentals. All consumable costs are to be recovered. Definition of classes of fees by groups. GROUP 1: City of Rancho Cucamonga sponsored and co- sponsored events; other govemmental agencies, including public schools serving Rancho Cucamonga residents. GROUP 2: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations which are located and based in the City whose management is not paid and organizations sponsoring a public forum or candidate's information night. GROUP 3: Not-for-profit, civic, athletic, social organizations and churches which have paid management and are located and based in the City. GROUP 4: City resident private party activity; City resident employee organizations; City resident political candidate use for fund raisers; City resident college organizations and committees; work parties and social events. GROUP 5.' City resident commercial, business, profit-making, non-resident not-for-profit, civic and social organizations, non-resident colleges, their organizations and committees, non-resident private party activity, non-resident employee associations. GROUP 6: Non-resident commercial, business, profit-making organizations and churches. Nei;Ihborhood and Community Park Liehted Sports Venue Feet All Rancho Cucamonga based youth sports organizations which are recreation in nature and meet an overall residency rate of a minimum of 80% will have their light fee waived in full. Other sports organizations will pay their light fee in full (100%) for the electrical costs only. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 33 of 53 Classes/Workshops/Programs Classes and workshops shall be structured on a cost-covering basis, and fees shall be set based upon the market rate of similar programs provided in the cities of Chino, Fontana, Ontario and Upland. Non-Resident Charge A $5.® fee shall be paid by each non-resident, each class, each team, each season to participate in City-sponsored classes. Said fee is payable at the time of registration. Does not include one-day activities or any trips sponsored by the City. Facility Rentals Hourly fees for Monday through 5 p.m., Friday use as follows: Friday, 5 p.m. and later, Saturday, Sunday and holiday use will be charged the 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. rate. Buildincl Renta s (Hourly) GROUP ROOM S~ZE TIME 'J 2 3 4 5 6 Small 8am-5pm None $8.® $8.® $25.® $30.00 $30.o0 Small ~ None $12.® $12.°° $35.® $40.oo $40.oo NOTE: Patio at Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center shall be rented only as a small room at 8am-5pm rate. ROOM SIZE Large* Large* GROUP TIME I 2 3 4 5 6 8am-5pm None $12.® $12.® $40.® $45.oo $45.oo 5pm-8am & None $20.® $20.® $50.® $55.oo $55.oo Weekends * Four-hour minimum charge for large room use on Friday and Saturday nights. NOTE: All non-profit community based youth organizations are permitted one free board or membership meeting per month. Room use for registration purposes is also free of charge. Groups who require room use beyond the above cdteria are charged the group 2 and 3 building rental hourly fees. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 34 of 53 Facility Decoratin,q Discount Rooms may be reserved for up to two (2) hours prior to and after the event at the rate of 50% of the normal room rental rate for the purposes of set-up and removal of decorations. Kitchen (Hourly) GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 None $5.0o $5.® $10.® $10.® $15.00 Lions West, Ceramic Room Rental (Hourly) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 No hourly fee $50.® $75.00 Materials Actual costs Actual cost Actual cost Staff $10.°° $10.® $10.°° Other Fees: If additional City staff is required, services will be charged at the rate of $10.® per hour for staff time. When a damage/security deposit is required, the charge is $200.°°. At the discretion of the Community Services Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure. Per Day Fees Rental Item Fee Coffee Pot (small) .............................. $5.® Coffee Pot (large) .............................. $15.0o Copy Service ..................................... $ .05 per page Flip Chart/Easel ................................. $20.® Microphone ........................................ $10.® PA System (small) ............................. $40.00 Piano* (see Note:) ............................. $25.® Podium with PA ................................. $40.® Professional Lighting ......................... $40.00 Tree or Spot Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 35 of 53 Rental Item Fee Staff for Lighting ................................. $10.°° hourly Projector/Overhead ........................... $10.® Projector/Slide ................................... $20.® Stage (large) ...................................... $50.00 Stage (small) ...................................... $20.® TV. with Video Player ........................ $20.o0 White Board with Easel ..................... $10.® * The piano is tuned by the City ~/vice a year. If the piano does not meet the standards of the user, the City will arrange for tuning at the user's sole expense. Tuning fees will be added to rental cost. C~OMM UNITY AMPHITHEATER The following are rental fees for Amphitheaters. The first hour of monitoring is included in the stage rental for Groups 2 and 3. Community Amphitheater Fees GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 Stage (Flat Fee) None $25.® $25.00 $72.® $80.00 $95.00 Staff: Sound Monitor None $10.00 $10.® $10.® $10.00 $10.oo (Hourly) E UESTRIAN CENTER Equestrian Center Fees - Room Rental (Hourly) * Fees and Charges will be as follows: GROUP ROOM SIZE TIME I 2 3 4 5 6 Small 8am-5pm None $8.® $8.o0 $25.® $30.oo $30.oo Small 5pm-Sam None $12.0o $12.® $35.oo $40.00 $40.oo Daily Snack Bar ** None $5.® $5.® Kitchen $10.oo $10.~ $15.~ Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 36 of 53 GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 Annual Shared Storage Fee N/C $75.® N/A N/A N/A N/A Equestrian Center Lights *** 100% Actual Energy Consumption * Includes use of P.A. System, ** A deposit may be required for this use. (See Equestrian Usage Policies.) *** The small arena will have a coin-metered box for electrical cost recovery. Storage For City Community Centers and Public Facilities, no storage will be provided to groups on an ongoing basis without the approval of the Community Services Director. PICNIC SHELTERS Some City parks may be reserved for use. Rental fees for picnic shelters located in these parks are as follows: GROUP Picnic Shelter (Hourly) SHELTER SIZE I 2 3 4 5 6 Small None $3.°° $3.® $5.® $8.® $8.0o Large None $5.® $5.® $8.00 $12.0o $12.o0 Lions West Park Area (Hourly) To accommodate activities at Lions East and West Community Centers, park open space located adjacent to Lions West Community Center may be reserved in conjunction with a building room rental at either facility. When such a rental occurs, the following fees shall be assessed. GROUP 1 2 3 4 5 6 None $5.® $5.® $8.® $12.00 $12.o0 Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 37 of 53 Civic Center Courtyard (Hourly) Rental of the Civic Center Courtyard provides renter with use of the Rains Conference Room, the restrooms and one staff member. If additional City staff is required, services will be charged at the rate of $10.oo per hour per staff member. When damage/security deposit is required, the charge is $200.®. At the discretion of the Community Service Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to the event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure. The following are rental fees for the Civic Center Courtyard: GROUP I 2 3 4 5 6 None $20.® $20.® $50.00 $55.® $55.00 Street Banner Dis l~ Fees Installation/Removal..: ....................... $75.00 per banner Administrative Fee ............................. $50.00 If the City becomes involved in creation and preparation of the banner NOTE:Applicant is still responsible for the actual cost of banner (payable in advance). Mobile Lift Fees Lift Service ......................................... $300.® Plus the cost of 2-Staff Members for the full time frame of the event. ($10.® hourly per Staff Member.) NOTE:Equipment is available for rent only for events conducted on City property and would require 2 part-time Staff Members to deliver, operate and retum the equipment. EPICENTER TOURNAMENTANDLEAGUE FEES Rental Fees (Per Field) GROUP 1-3 Field Rental* 2 Hours and Less $35.00 GROUP I-3 GROUP4~ $100.® GROUP4~ Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 38 of 53 4 Hours and Less $70.® $200.® All Day $140.® $265.® All 3-Fields/Ail day N/A $695.® Deposit $250.® $400.°° Infield Lining Actual Cost Actual Cost Light Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost * Includes initial field dragging and watering. The deposit will be applied to the total rental fee. When additional City staffing, equipment and material are required for tournaments and/or special event programs scheduled at the Epicenter Sports fields, the applicant is required to pay all event- related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Community and Neighborhood Park Leagues and Tournament~ Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities, the fee is $10.® per hour per staff member required. Applicant is also required to pay all event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Softball Field & Soccer Fields (Per Field) Organized Leagues and Tournaments* GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4 ** GROUP 5-6 ** 2 Hours and Less None $20.® $50.00 4 Hours and Less None $35.® $90.00 All Day None $85.® $160.0o * A $5.~° non-resident fee will be assessed per non-resident team per tournament. All other rental fees are still applicable. ** A $200.oo refundable security, damage, cleaning, performance deposit is required. Applicant is required to pay ail event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary Rental Fees (Per Field) Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 39 of 53 GROUP 1-6 Drag and Line* Actual Cost * Drag and Line fees include staff costs and are for one drag and line per field. GROUP 1-3 GROUP 4-6 Bases* $20.® $40.00 * Bases are available only when renting the fields fora tournament. Fee is based on per field, per day, basis subject to availability by City. Snack Bar Seasonal For City-Owned snack bars located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3-6 None $450.® N/A Other non-profit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e. trailers) will be charged a fiat $300.°°seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in a City-Sponsored event. Stora.qe Seasonal For City-Owned storage located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: GROUP t GROUP 2 GROUP 3-6 None $75.® N/A R.C. FAMILY SPORTS CENTER RENTAL FEES -- Athletic Use ONLY Basketball Couds(Per CouP) GROUP1 2 Hours and Less None 4 Hours and Less None 6 Hours and Less None GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 $40.® $50.® $75.® $90.® $100.® $120.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 40 of 53 GROUP 1 Staff: 2 Persons None (Hourly) Refundable Cleaning/Damage Deposit None GROUP 2-4 $20.°° $200.® GROUP 5-6 $20.® $200.® Racquetball Courts (Per Court) GROUP 1 3 Hours and Less None 6 Hours and Less None Staff: 2 Persons None (Hourly) Refundable None Cleaning/Damage Deposit GROUP 2-4 $45.® $75.® $20.® $200.® GROUP 5-6 $60.00 $90.® $20.00 $200.® R.C. Sports Center Teen Center Rental (Hourly) GROUP 1 GROUP 2-4 GROUP 5-6 Rental Fee: 2 Hour Minimum None $40.® $50.0o Staff: I Staff, 1-30 Persons None $10.® $10.00 (Houdy) 2 Staff, 30 + Persons None $20.® $20.oo (Hourly) Refundable None $200.® $200.0o Cleaning/Damage Deposit EPICENTER STADIUM COMPLEX FEES Stadium Events a. Stadium Rental Ticketed Events * $1,500.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales Non-Ticketed Events $2,000.® per day Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 41 of 53 b. Sky Box Rental Rate c. Cafe' Area Rental Rate d. Pavilion Area Rental Rate i, Covered Pavilion 3~d Base side ii. Open Pavilion 1St Base side e. Event Expenses Ticketed Events * $50.® per hour $50.® per hour $50.® per hour $25.® per hour Non-Ticketed Events $50.® per hour $50.® per hour $30.® per hour $15.® per hour Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Parkin~l Lot Events a. Stadium On-Site Lots i. Rental rates for Parking Lots A,B,C ii. Rental rates for Parking Lots D,E,F Ticketed Events * $500.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $250.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sale Non-Ticketed Events $670.® per day $ 335.® per day b. Expanded Parking Lots i. Parking Lot #1 ii. Parking Lot #2 iii. Parking Lot #3 iii. Event Quadrant A-F c. Event Expenses $500.°° per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $250.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $1,500.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales OR $250.® per day plus 10% of gross ticket sales $670.® per day $335.® per day $2,000.® per day $335.® per day Applicant is required to pay event-related expenses including personnel, equipment and materials and other related costs. Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 42 of 53 Parking Fees ** a. Baseball Events b. Concerts and Special Events c. Parking Lot Events Option to charge: $2.0o per car; $15.® per bus Option to charge: $3.0o to $5.°° per car; $5.® to $10.® VIP per car; $15.® per bus, depending on event Option to charge: $2.oo to $5.® per car Concessions a. Food and Beverage b. Merchandise and Novelties (Books, Novelties, Tapes, CD's, Programs, T-Shirts, etc.) 20% of gross sales 10% for non-profit organizations 20% of gross sales to be negotiated 10% for non-profit organizations Miscellaneous a. Commercial Filming b. Commercial Filming in Parking Lot c. Commercial Photograph d. Location Credit Required Minimum of $1,000.® to $4,000.® per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services Minimum of $500.® to $2,000.® per day, depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services Minimum of $500.® to $2,000.® per day, depending on photography requirements, plus actual costs for City services e. Deposit Additional Move-in/ Move-Out Days Minimum of $500.® to $2,500.® per day, depending upon event/rental requirements. At the discretion of the Community Services Director, additional damage/security deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure. 50% of daily event rental rate g. Tent/Canopy Main- tenance Reserve Fee Minimum of $300.® to $1,000.® per event depending upon event/rental requirements. * Based on Provisions of Municipal Ordinance. ** Exception to Parking Rates apply to vehicles entitled to occupy the preferred parking area (Lot A) delineated in the lease with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. SECTION 11: Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 43 of 53 RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF DEPARTMENT FEER Description Fee Fingerprinting ..................................... $10.® per card Criminal Reports ................................ $20.® Traffic Accident Reports .................... $20.°° Traffic Accident Reports - Mail ..........$20,® Criminal History Letters ..................... $15.® Bicycle License .................................. $3,® Special Event Jobs *. ......................... No FEE Costs Associated with Towing and Releasing Stored or Impounded Vehicles .......... $75.® Repossession Vehicle Release Fee .$15.® Citation Proof of Correction **. .......... $15.® Copy of citation or other document. Not A Report .................................. $5.oo Deputy Reserve ............................. $31. o6 hourly Deputy II ........................................ $57.27 hourly Sergeant ........................................ $64.26 hourly * There is no fee for special events. However, ifsecurity services are required for the event such as regular or reserve officers, or private security, these fees are separate. ** This fee will not apply to persons residing or working within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or citations issued by the Rancho Cucamonga Police. SECTION 12: MISCELLANEOUS FEES Description Fee Calculation for 1915 Bond Act Assessment Districts ........................ $7.50 Amendment to Tax Statements for Prepaid Assessments ................. $20.® Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 44 of 53 Description Fee Bingo License ................................... $50.® Industrial Bond Development Bond Application ............................... A fee of 1/4 of 1% of the established maximum amount of the proposed bond application and not less than $1,250.00 Dog Licensing .................................... (See Resolution 81-79) Filming Permits: Application Fee (See Planning Fees) ........................................................... $129.® Basic Fee for each day of filming ...... $132.50 Business License Tax ........................ $20.® Investigation Fe 00 e ............................... $110. per filming day Fire Department ................................ $100.oo per hour * Massage Establishment Application .$225.® Renewal ............................................. $111.00 Massage Outcall Service .................. $90.® Renewal ............................................. $45.® Massage Technician Application ...... $178.oo Renewal ............................................. $90.® Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Appeal Fee (per Section 8.08, Municipal Code)...$300.® Mobile Home Park Rent Mediation Filing Fee (per Section 8.08, Municipal Code)... $15.® Police Department** . ...................... (See Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff Department Fees) School Fees ...................................... (See Ordinance Nos. 69-C and Ordinance No. 74 regarding these fees) Description Fee Solicitor, Non-profit, Identification Badge ........................... $5.® each Taxicab Driver's Permit Application ,.$120.oo Renewal ............................................. $60.® Taxicab Service Application ............. $95.® Renewal ............................................. $45.°° *Per Hour for each 3-man piece of equipment ** Number and type of personnel is determined by the Station Commander after reviewing plans for the event Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 45 of 53 C. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall become effective with its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: 2002. ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 46 of 53 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on this __ day of 2002. Executed this day of 2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 47 of 53 FEE STUDY SECTION 3 - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSEDE FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Passports Application Processing ~ $15.® N/A NEW FEE Fee for the City of Set by Rancho Cucamonga Federal Government Passports Set of 2" X 2" ~ $12.® N/A NEWFEE Polaroid ID Photos Comparable to what other cities charge Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 48 of 53 FEE STUDY SECTION 5 - ENGINEERING DIVISION I SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION Copying Rates, Media and Subscription Fees Map/Plan Not Listed $3? per sheet N/A To cover cost of paper SECTION 4 Reproductions NEW FEE Applications SECTION 5.1 Tentative Parcel Map $2,5147 $2,51470 N/A Transfer to Planning Applications Initial Study $225? $225? N/A Transfer to Planning SECTION 5.1 Applications SECTION 5.1 Time Extension $549? $549? N/A Transfer to Planning SECTIoNApplicati°ns5.1 TentatiVeMap AppeaIParcel $251.0o $251 .oo N/A Transfer to Planning Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 49 of 53 FEE STUDY SECTION 9 - PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCEN;F CHANGE EXPLANATION Other Application Fees Temporary Use $219.0o $219.® 0% Change Wording SECTION 9.3 Permit Model Home Applications Tentative Parcel Map E~ Transfer from SECTION 9.1 $2,514.oo N/A Engineering Applications SECTION 9.1 Initial Study $225.°° $225.0o N/A Transfer from Engineering Fee Already Addressed in Planning Fee Schedule Other Application Fees Time Extension $549.® $549.oo Transfer from SECTION 9.3 N/A Engineering Fee Already Addressed in Planning Fee Schedule Appeal Fees SECTION 9.4 Tentative Parcel ~ $251 .oo N/A Transfer from Map Appeal Engineering Fee Already Addressed in Planning Fee Schedule Resolution No. 02-XXX Page 50 of 53 FEE STUDY SECTION 11 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FEES SERVICE DESCRIPTION CURRENT FEE PROPOSED FEE PERCENT CHANGE EXPLANATION POLICE SECURITY SERVICES SECTION 11 Deputy Reserve $31.°° Hourly $31.0o Hourly N/A Typographical Error Deputy II $57.°° Hourly $51.2? Hourly N/A Typographical Error Sergeant $64.® Hourly $64.3° Hourly N/A Typographical Error T H E C [ T Y 0 F I~AN CHO (~ UCAFIONGA Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 2, 2002 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Britt W. Wilson, Management Analyst III, City Manager's Office CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST Background At the December 5, 2001 City Council Meeting, the Council heard a presentation by Mr. Aaron Knox representing Inland Empire Airports First, a group advocating the development of airports in the Inland Empire first (i.e. before those in Los Angeles or Orange Counties). An information sheet and a sample resolution were provided to the Council at the December 5, 2001 meeting and are also attached to this staff report. Mr. Knox also gave a power point presentation on December 5, 2001 that was subsequently distributed in hard copy format to the Council at their request. The Council requested that this matter be placed on tonight's agenda for further consideration. Accordingly, we have included a resolution of support that is based upon the model resolution provided by Inland Empire Airports First. Mr. Knox has been invited to the January 2, 2002 meeting to answer further questions the Council may have regarding Inland Empire Airports First. Britt W. Wilson Management Analyst III City Manager's Office H:\CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTS\INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST JAN 2, 2002.doc INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST INFORMATION & SAMPLE RESOLUTION "Inland Empire Airports First" Southern Califomia is served by more airports then any other metropolitan area in the United States. The Inland Empire counties of Riverside and San Bemardino are host to five (5) major airports; Ontario Intemational, Palm Springs International, San Bemardino International, Southern California Logistics and March Inland Port. According to the U.S. Census, San Bernardino & Riverside counties' current population of 3.25 million is greater than that of 20 states. Even SCAG's most conservative forecast shows that by 2020 the Inland Empire's population will grow by 1.83 million. This is a rate faster then LA county and faster than Orange, Ventura, Imperial, and San Diego counties combined. The Inland Empire's population growth will exceed that of 47 states by 2020 with only California, Texas and Florida adding more people. The SCAG research on air passenger demand predicts an enormous increase from the Inland Empire over the next 20 years. Annual air passenger volume will climb from 6.7 million to 43.4 million. An increasing share of the Southern Califomia's industrial space is now in the Inland Empire. The Inland Empire has more industrial space than Orange County and 25% of the amount built in L.A. County since World War II. CA Employment Development Department shows the Inland Empire's economy currently supporting over 1 million jobs. According to SCAG, including the self-employed, the Inland Empire will expand to a 1.8 million job economy by 2020. SCAG's research also shows the Inland Empire's annual demand for air cargo services soaring to over 5 million tons within the next 20 years. Demands from the Inland Empire will be more than double today's LAX air cargo volume. However, the lack of air cargo and limited passenger service in the Inland Empire means a growing number of tracks and cars on freeways to coastal airports, increased traffic congestion throughout Southern California and increased air pollution due to traffic stuck on already congested freeways. Airline executive inertia appears to be the major barrier to getting airlines to expand flights into the Inland Empire. It is clearly in the airlines self interest to expand their existing facilities and .not expand inland. This phenomenon, to a great extent, puts regional transportation and land use planning in the hands of the airlines. By concentrating their flights at only a few major airports, the airlines are forcing Southern California to pay an increasing price for ground transportation infrastructure. Expanding LAX or building a new E1 Toro airport will increase freeway traffic into Orange and LA Counties and drive Southern California's traffic congestion to unmanageable levels, crippling the Inland Empire's economic development advantages. Attempts to mitigate the surface access challenges for expanded capacity at costal county airports will siphon off critical transportation dollars that are needed to solve ground access and traffic challenges in the support and expansion of Inland Empire Airports. California's economic and political leaders are only vaguely aware of the Inland Empire's growing power. Here is an issue on which the leadership of the Inland Empire must take a stand. We should join together to oppose the expansions of LAX and Orange County airports until a full range of Inland Empire air passenger and air cargo flights are available. The leadership in both Riverside and San Bernardino counties must work together as one region to make the development and expansion of Inland Empire Airports the first priority when considering Southern California's long-term transportation needs. Only the collective strength of the two counties will ensure the Inland Empire's future quality of life and economic viability. For more information on this important regional effort, please contact Aaron Knox at (909) 485-2040 or aaron~harleyknox.com. 2 Following is a growing list of Inland Empire governments, transportation and planning organizations and business groups who have joined this important regional effort and adopted a position in support of Inland Empire Airports First. "INL/IND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST" Resolutions Received as of ll/$O/O1 1. Riverside County Board of Supervisors 2. Riverside County Transportation Commission 3. Western Riverside Council of Governments 4. March Joint Powers Authority $. City of Beaumont 6. City of Fontana 7. City of Hemet 8. City of Lake Elsinore 9. City of Moreno Valley 10. City of Perris 11. City of Riverside 12. City of Tcmecula 13. City of Victorville 14. Inland Empire Economic Partnership 15. Valley Group 16. Hemet/San Jacinto Action Group 17. Economic Council of Pass Area Communities 18. Greater Riverside Chambers of Commerce 19. Fontana Chamber of Commerce 20. Beaumont Chamber of Commerce 21. National Association of Industrial and Office Properties, Inland Empire Chapter 3 "INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST" Statement of Principles for Airport Capacity Enhancement in Southern California WHEREAS the Southern California area including Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bemardino, and Ventura Counties is served by more commercial airports than any other major metropolitan area in the United States; and WHEREAS available Southern California Airports include: Los Angeles International Airport, Burbank Airport, Long Beach Airport, Ontario International Airport, Orange County Airport, Palmdale Airport, March GlobalPort, San Bernardino International Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, and Palm Springs Regional Airport; and WHEREAS the greatest population growth in Southern California during the coming centuries will occur in the Inland Empire Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino; and WHEREAS Los Angeles International Airport, Burbank Airport, Long Beach Airport, and Orange County Airport are all located in highly urbanized areas where environmental concerns and community resistance make further expansion difficult; and WHEREAS Inland Empire Airports include March GlobalPort, San Bernardino International Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, Ontario International Akport and Palm Springs Regional are well located to serve future Southern California aviation needs and have great unused capacity; and WHEREAS the communities near Inland Empire Airports are supportive of their airports and would greatly benefit from the increased use of those facilities; and WHEREAS increasing freeway traffic into Orange and LA Counties will make ground access to coastal airports extremely difficult and attempts to mitigate the surface access challenges to these airports will siphon off discretionary state transportation dollars that otherwise could be used to solve traffic challenges in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that favors and supports the development, expansion and utilization ofwelMocated aviation facilities available in the Inland Empire; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the undersigned agree that future growth in Southern California air traffic should be directed to airports where neighboring communities are supportive; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it is good public policy to direct air traffic to Inland Empire Airports with excess capacity rather than spending billions of dollars to expand capacity in highly populated areas; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that regional planning agencies should focus their energies on improving surface transportation links among existing airports and population centers; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that agrees to work with local economic development organization and regional planning agencies to satisfy Southern California's future aviation needs by encouraging and fostering commercial passenger and cargo service at Inland Empire Airports before the expansion and development of airports in Orange and LA Counties. PROPOSED RESOLUTION Resolution No. 02- z// A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF "INLAND EMPIRE AIRPORTS FIRST" WHEREAS, the Southern California area including Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties is served by more commercial airports than any other major metropolitan area in United States; and WHEREAS, available Southern California Airports include: Los Angeles International Airport, Burbank Airport, Long Beach Airport, Ontario International Airport, Orange County Airport, Palmdale Airport, March GIobalPort, San Bernardino International Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, and Palm Springs Regional Airport; and WHEREAS, the greatest population growth in Southern California during the coming centuries will occur in the Inland Empire Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, Los Angeles International Airport, Burbank Airport, Long Beach Airport, and Orange County Airport are all located in highly urbanized areas where environmental concerns and community resistance may make further expansion difficult; and WHEREAS, Inland Empire Airports, which include March GlobaIPort, San Bernardino International Airport, Southern California Logistics Airport, Ontario International Airport and Palm Springs Regional are well located to serve future Southern California aviation needs and have great unused capacity; and WHEREAS, communities near Inland Empire Airports are supportive of their airports and would greatly benefit from the increased use of those facilities; and WHEREAS, increasing freeway traffic into Orange and LA Counties may make ground access to coastal airports extremely difficult, and attempts to mitigate the surface access challenges to these airports may siphon off discretionary state transportation dollars that otherwise wouid be used to solve traffic challenges in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga favors and supports the development, expansion and utilization of well located aviation facilities available in the Inland Empire; and. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the undersigned agrees that future growth in Southern California air traffic should first be directed to airports where neighboring communities are supportive; and Resolution No. 02- Page 2 of BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it is good public policy to first direct air traffic to Inland Empire Airports with excess capacity rather than spending billions of dollars to expand capacity in other highly populated areas and to encourage and foster development of airports in the Inland Empire. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of ,2002. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the __. day of , 2002. Executed this day of ,2002, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Britt Wilson H:\RESOLUTIONS\RESOLUTION - Inland Empire First 01-02-02.doc